FORM 10-Q

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549



x☒	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the quarterly period ended	June 30, ~~2018~~	2019
o☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the transition period from ______ to ______
	Commission file number ~~1-10816~~	1-10816

MGIC Investment ~~Corporation~~

Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



~~WISCONSIN~~Wisconsin		39-1486475
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

250 E. ~~KILBOURN AVENUE~~Kilbourn Avenue		53202
~~MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN~~Milwaukee,	Wisconsin	(Zip Code)
(Address of principal executive offices)

(414)		347-6480
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

~~(414) 347-6480~~

~~(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)~~Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:



Title of each class	Trading Symbol	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common stock	MTG	New York Stock Exchange

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐



~~YES~~ x	NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically ~~and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,~~ every Interactive Data File required to be submitted ~~and posted~~ pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit ~~and post~~ such files). Yes ☒No ☐



~~YES~~ x	NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):



Large accelerated filerx	☒	Accelerated filer o☐	Non-accelerated filer o☐	Smaller reporting companyo	☐	(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Emerging growth companyo	☐	If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES ☐NO x



~~YES~~ o	NO x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable ~~date.~~date: As of July 31, 2019, there were 354,154,379 shares of common stock of the registrant, par value $1.00 per share, outstanding.

CLASS OF STOCK PAR VALUE DATE NUMBER OF SHARES
Common stock $1.00 July 31, 2018 362,155,055

Forward Looking and Other Statements

All statements in this report that address events, developments or results that we expect or anticipate may occur in the future are “forward looking statements.” Forward looking statements consist of statements that relate to matters other than historical fact. In most cases, forward looking statements may be identified by words such as “believe,” “anticipate” or “expect,” or words of similar import. The risk factors referred to in “Forward Looking Statements and Risk Factors – Location of Risk Factors” in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations below, may cause our actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by forward looking statements that we may make. We are not undertaking any obligation to update any forward looking statements or other statements we may make in this document even though these statements may be affected by events or circumstances occurring after the forward looking statements or other statements were made. Therefore no reader of this document should rely on these statements being current as of any time other than the time at which this document was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2019 | 2

~~Table of contents~~

MGIC INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, ~~2018~~2019



	Table of contents
			Page
			PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	Item 1	Financial Statements:
		Consolidated Balance Sheets - June 30, ~~2018~~2019 (Unaudited) and December 31, ~~2017~~2018	7
		Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) - Three and Six Months Ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018	8
		Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited) - Three and Six Months Ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018	9
		Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity (Unaudited) - Three and Six Months Ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018	10
		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) - Six Months Ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018	11
		Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	12
		Note 1 - Nature of Business and Basis of Presentation	12
		Note 2 - ~~New~~Significant Accounting ~~Pronouncements~~Policies	12
		Note 3 - Debt	1514
		Note 4 - Reinsurance	14
	Note 5 - Litigation and Contingencies	16
		Note 56 - ~~Litigation and Contingencies~~Earnings Per Share	17
		Note 67 - ~~Earnings Per Share~~Investments	1918
		~~Note 7 - Investments~~	19
		Note 8 - Fair Value Measurements	2321
		Note 9 - Other Comprehensive Income	24
	Note 10 - Benefit Plans	25
	Note 11 - Loss Reserves	26
		Note 1012 - ~~Benefit Plans~~Shareholders’ Equity	2728
		Note 1113 - ~~Income Taxes~~Share-Based Compensation	2728
		Note 1214 - ~~Loss Reserves~~Statutory Information	28

~~Note 13 - Shareholders’ Equity~~Item 2	32
		~~Note 14 - Share-Based Compensation~~	33
		~~Note 15 - Statutory Information~~	33

	~~Item 2~~	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	3530
	Item 3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	6855
	Item 4	Controls and Procedures	6855

			PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1	Legal Proceedings	7056
	Item 1A	Risk Factors	7056
Item 2	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	61
Item 26	~~Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities~~Exhibits	7962
		~~Item 6~~INDEX TO EXHIBITS	~~Exhibits~~62
SIGNATURES		80
	~~INDEX TO EXHIBITS~~		80
	~~SIGNATURES~~		8163

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2019 | 3

~~Table of contents~~

Glossary of terms and acronyms

/ A

ARMs

Adjustable rate mortgages

ABS

Asset-backed securities

ASC

Accounting Standards Codification

Available Assets

Assets, as designated under the PMIERs, that are readily available to pay claims, and include the most liquid investments

/ B

Book or book year

A group of loans insured in a particular calendar year

BPMI

Borrower-paid mortgage insurance

/ C

CECL

Current expected credit losses

CFPB

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

CLO

Collateralized loan obligations

CMBS

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

/ D

DAC

Deferred insurance policy acquisition costs

Debt-to-income (“DTI”) ratio

The ratio, expressed as a percentage, of a ~~borrowers’~~borrower’s total debt payments to gross income

Direct

When referring to insurance or risk written or in force, “direct” means before giving effect to reinsurance

/ F

Fannie Mae

Federal National Mortgage Association

FCRA

Fair Credit Reporting Act

FEMA

Federal Emergency Management Agency

FHA

Federal Housing Administration

FHFA

Federal Housing Finance Agency

FHLB

Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago, of which MGIC is a member

FICO score

A measure of consumer credit risk provided by credit bureaus, typically produced from statistical models by Fair Isaac Corporation utilizing data collected by the credit bureaus

Freddie Mac

Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation

/ G

GAAP

Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States

GSEs

Collectively, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

/ H

HAMP

Home Affordable Modification Program

HARP

Home Affordable Refinance Program

Home Re Transactions

Excess-of-loss reinsurance transactions with unaffiliated special purpose insurers domiciled in Bermuda

HOPA

Homeowners Protection Act

HUD

Housing and Urban Development

/ I

IADA

Individual Assistance Disaster Area

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 4~~

~~Table of contents~~

IBNR

Losses incurred but not reported

IIF

Insurance in force, which for loans insured by us, is equal to the unpaid principal balance, as reported to us

~~/ J~~

~~JCT~~

~~Joint Committee on Taxation~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2019 | 4

ILN

Insurance-linked notes

/ L

LAE

Loss adjustment expenses

Legacy book

Mortgage insurance policies written prior to 2009

Loan-to-value ("LTV") ratio

The ratio, expressed as a percentage, of the dollar amount of the first mortgage loan to the value of the property at the time the loan became insured and does not reflect subsequent housing price appreciation or depreciation. Subordinate mortgages may also be present.

Long-term debt:

5.75% Notes

5.75% Senior Notes due on August 15, 2023, with interest payable semi-annually on February 15 and August 15 of each year

9% Debentures

9% Convertible Junior Subordinated Debentures due on April 1, 2063, with interest payable semi-annually on April 1 and October 1 of each year

FHLB Advance or the Advance

1.91% Fixed rate advance from the FHLB due on February 10, 2023, with interest payable monthly

Loss ratio

The ratio, expressed as a percentage, of the sum of incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses to NPE

Low down payment loans or mortgages

Loans with less than 20% down payments

LPMI

Lender-paid mortgage insurance

/ M

MBS

Mortgage-backed securities

MD&A

Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations

MGIC

Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corporation, a subsidiary of MGIC Investment Corporation

MAC

MGIC Assurance Corporation, a subsidiary of MGIC

MIC

MGIC Indemnity Corporation, a subsidiary of MGIC

Minimum Required Assets

The greater of $400 million or the total of the minimum amount of Available Assets that must be held under the PMIERs based upon a percentage of RIF weighted by certain risk attributes

MPP

Minimum Policyholder Position, as required under certain state requirements. The “policyholder position” of a mortgage insurer is its net worth or surplus, contingency reserve and a portion of the reserves for unearned premiums

/ N

N/A

Not applicable for the period presented

NAIC

The National Association of Insurance Commissioners

NIW

New Insurance Written, is the aggregate original principal amount of the mortgages that are insured during a period

N/M

Data, or calculation, deemed not meaningful for the period presented

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 5~~

~~Table of contents~~

NPE

The amount of premiums earned, net of premiums assumed and ceded under reinsurance agreements

NPL

Non-performing loan, which is a delinquent loan, at any stage in its delinquency

NPW

The amount of premiums written, net of premiums assumed and ceded under reinsurance agreements

/ O

OCI

Office of the Commissioner of Insurance of the State of Wisconsin

/ P

Persistency

The percentage of our insurance remaining in force from one year prior

PMI

Private Mortgage Insurance (as an industry or product type)

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2019 | 5

PMIERs

Private Mortgage Insurer Eligibility Requirements issued by the GSEs

Premium Yield

The ratio of NPE divided by the average IIF outstanding for the period measured

/ Q

QSR Transaction

Quota share reinsurance transaction with a group of unaffiliated reinsurers

/ R

~~REMIC~~

~~Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduit~~

RESPA

Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act

RIF

Risk in force, which for an individual loan insured by us, is equal to the unpaid loan principal balance, as reported to us, multiplied by the insurance coverage percentage. RIF is sometimes referred to as ~~exposure~~exposure.

Risk-to-capital

Under certain state regulations, the ratio of RIF, net of reinsurance and exposure on policies currently in default and for which loss reserves have been established, to the level of statutory capital

RMBS

Residential mortgage-backed securities

/ S

State Capital Requirements

Under certain state regulations, the minimum amount of statutory capital relative to risk in force (or similar measure)

~~/ T~~

~~Tax Act~~

~~The U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017 and commonly referred to as the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act”~~

/ U

Underwriting expense ratio

The ratio, expressed as a percentage, of the underwriting and operating expenses, net and amortization of DAC of our combined insurance operations (which excludes underwriting and operating expenses of our non-insurance subsidiaries) to NPW

Underwriting profit

NPE minus incurred losses and underwriting and operating expenses

USDA

U.S. Department of Agriculture

/ V

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

VIE

Variable interest entity

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 ~~2018~~2019 | 6

~~Table of contents~~

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

MGIC INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands) Note June 30,
2018 December 31,
2017
ASSETS (Unaudited)
Investment portfolio:
7 / 8

Fixed income, available for sale, at fair value (amortized cost, 2018 - $4,983,355; 2017 - $4,946,278) $ 4,926,247
$ 4,983,315
Equity securities, at fair value (cost, 2018 - $4,111; 2017 - $7,223)
2 / 7 / 8
4,048
7,246
Other invested assets, at cost
2 / 7 / 8
3,100
—
Total investment portfolio 4,933,395
4,990,561
Cash and cash equivalents 191,894
99,851
Accrued investment income 47,125
46,060
Reinsurance recoverable on loss reserves
4
37,051
48,474
Reinsurance recoverable on paid losses 3,295
3,872
Premiums receivable 56,213
54,045
Home office and equipment, net 49,461
44,936
Deferred insurance policy acquisition costs 18,807
18,841
Deferred income taxes, net
11
161,488
234,381
Other assets 93,287
78,478
Total assets $ 5,592,016
$ 5,619,499

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities:
Loss reserves
12
$ 813,015
$ 985,635
Unearned premiums 406,159
392,934
Federal Home Loan Bank advance
3
155,000
155,000
Senior notes
3
419,136
418,560
Convertible junior subordinated debentures
3
256,872
256,872
Other liabilities 227,959
255,972
Total liabilities 2,278,141
2,464,973
Contingencies
5

Shareholders’ equity:
13

Common stock (one dollar par value, shares authorized 1,000,000; shares issued 2018 - 371,348; 2017 - 370,567; shares outstanding 2018 - 362,150; 2017 - 370,567) 371,348
370,567
Paid-in capital 1,852,251
1,850,582
Treasury stock at cost (shares 2018 - 9,198) (100,059 ) —
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax (117,294 ) (43,783 )
Retained earnings 1,307,629
977,160
Total shareholders’ equity 3,313,875
3,154,526
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $ 5,592,016
$ 5,619,499



MGIC INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands)	Note	June 30, 2019			December 31, 2018
ASSETS		(Unaudited)
Investment portfolio:	7 / 8
Fixed income, available-for-sale, at fair value (amortized cost 2019 - $5,357,436; 2018 - $5,196,784)		$	5,504,823		$	5,151,987
Equity securities, at fair value (cost 2019 - $3,991; 2018 - $3,993)	2 / 7 / 8	4,114			3,932
Other invested assets, at cost	2 / 7 / 8	3,100			3,100
Total investment portfolio		5,512,037			5,159,019
Cash and cash equivalents		218,908			151,892
Restricted cash and cash equivalents		6,275			3,146
Accrued investment income		48,272			48,001
Reinsurance recoverable on loss reserves	4	18,402			33,328
Reinsurance recoverable on paid losses		16,903			2,948
Premiums receivable		57,492			55,090
Home office and equipment, net		51,607			51,734
Deferred insurance policy acquisition costs		17,669			17,888
Deferred income taxes, net		20,932			69,184
Other assets		87,040			85,572
Total assets		$	6,055,537		$	5,677,802

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities:
Loss reserves	11	$	621,902		$	674,019
Unearned premiums		400,999			409,985
Federal Home Loan Bank advance	3	155,000			155,000
Senior notes	3	420,290			419,713
Convertible junior subordinated debentures	3	256,872			256,872
Other liabilities		164,809			180,322
Total liabilities		2,019,872			2,095,911
Contingencies	5
Shareholders’ equity:	12
Common stock (one dollar par value, shares authorized 1,000,000; shares issued 2019 - 371,353; 2018 - 371,353; shares outstanding 2019 - 354,177; 2018 - 355,371)		371,353			371,353
Paid-in capital		1,860,578			1,862,536
Treasury stock at cost (shares 2019 - 17,176; 2018 - 15,982)		(194,070		)	(175,059		)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		30,810			(124,214		)
Retained earnings		1,966,994			1,647,275
Total shareholders’ equity		4,035,665			3,581,891
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity		$	6,055,537		$	5,677,802

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 ~~2018~~2019 | 7

~~Table of contents~~

MGIC INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)

Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands, except per share data) Note 2018 2017 2018 2017
Revenues:
Premiums written:
Direct $ 274,726
$ 275,245
$ 544,760
$ 541,068
Assumed 2,085
685
2,177
1,973
Ceded
4
(21,375 ) (30,096 ) (54,595 ) (60,505 )
Net premiums written 255,436
245,834
492,342
482,536
Increase in unearned premiums, net (8,472 ) (14,698 ) (13,271 ) (22,297 )
Net premiums earned 246,964
231,136
479,071
460,239
Investment income, net of expenses 34,502
29,716
66,623
59,193
Net realized investment losses
7
(1,897 ) (52 ) (2,226 ) (177 )
Other revenue 2,431
2,512
4,302
4,937
Total revenues 282,000
263,312
547,770
524,192

Losses and expenses: ��
Losses incurred, net
12
(13,455 ) 27,339
10,395
54,958
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs 2,845
2,584
5,417
4,814
Other underwriting and operating expenses, net 41,842
38,511
87,932
79,276
Interest expense 13,246
14,197
26,479
30,506
Loss on debt extinguishment —
65
—
65
Total losses and expenses 44,478
82,696
130,223
169,619
Income before tax 237,522
180,616
417,547
354,573
Provision for income taxes
11
50,708
61,994
87,096
146,153
Net income $ 186,814
$ 118,622
$ 330,451
$ 208,420

Earnings per share:
Basic
6
$ 0.51
$ 0.32
$ 0.89
$ 0.59
Diluted
6
$ 0.49
$ 0.31
$ 0.87
$ 0.55

Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic
6
368,578
366,918
369,736
354,035
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted
6
388,881
394,470
390,236
398,302



MGIC INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)

		Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands, except per share data)	Note	2019			2018			2019			2018
Revenues:
Premiums written:
Direct		$	283,189		$	274,726		$	557,086		$	544,760
Assumed		1,505			2,085			2,612			2,177
Ceded	4	(41,096		)	(21,375		)	(71,819		)	(54,595		)
Net premiums written		243,598			255,436			487,879			492,342
Decrease (increase) in unearned premiums, net		3,504			(8,472		)	8,984			(13,271		)
Net premiums earned		247,102			246,964			496,863			479,071
Investment income, net of expenses		42,423			34,502			83,008			66,623
Net realized investment gains (losses)	7	307			(1,897		)	(219		)	(2,226		)
Other revenue		2,485			2,431			4,315			4,302
Total revenues		292,317			282,000			583,967			547,770

Losses and expenses:
Losses incurred, net	11	21,836			(13,455		)	60,899			10,395
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs		2,760			2,845			5,238			5,417
Other underwriting and operating expenses, net		42,960			41,842			88,900			87,932
Interest expense		13,550			13,246			26,783			26,479
Total losses and expenses		81,106			44,478			181,820			130,223
Income before tax		211,211			237,522			402,147			417,547
Provision for income taxes		43,433			50,708			82,428			87,096
Net income		$	167,778		$	186,814		$	319,719		$	330,451

Earnings per share:
Basic	6	$	0.47		$	0.51		$	0.90		$	0.89
Diluted	6	$	0.46		$	0.49		$	0.87		$	0.87

Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic	6	355,734			368,578			355,694			369,736
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted	6	376,603			388,881			376,635			390,236

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 ~~2018~~2019 | 8

~~Table of contents~~

MGIC INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Unaudited)

Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands) Note 2018 2017 2018 2017
Net income $ 186,814
$ 118,622
$ 330,451
$ 208,420
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:
9

Change in unrealized investment gains and losses
7
(9,922 ) 25,749
(74,375 ) 37,870
Benefit plan adjustments 388
(142 ) 882
(295 )
Foreign currency translation adjustment —
—
—
31
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax (9,534 ) 25,607
(73,493 ) 37,606
Comprehensive income $ 177,280
$ 144,229
$ 256,958
$ 246,026



MGIC INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Unaudited)

		Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands)	Note	2019		2018			2019		2018
Net income		$	167,778	$	186,814		$	319,719	$	330,451
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:	9
Change in unrealized investment gains and losses	7	70,754		(9,922		)	151,825		(74,375		)
Benefit plan adjustments		1,549		388			3,199		882
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		72,303		(9,534		)	155,024		(73,493		)
Comprehensive income		$	240,081	$	177,280		$	474,743	$	256,958

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 ~~2018~~2019 | 9

~~Table of contents~~

MGIC INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (Unaudited)

Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands) Note 2018 2017
Common stock
Balance, beginning of period $ 370,567
$ 359,400
Net common stock issued under share-based compensation plans 781
771
Issuance of common stock —
10,386
Balance, end of period 371,348
370,557

Paid-in capital
Balance, beginning of period 1,850,582
1,782,337
Net common stock issued under share-based compensation plans (8,854 ) (7,494 )
Issuance of common stock —
60,903
Equity compensation 10,523
6,855
Balance, end of period 1,852,251
1,842,601

Treasury stock
Balance, beginning of period —
(150,359 )
Repurchase of common stock
13
(100,059 ) —
Reissuance of treasury stock, net
13
—
150,359
Balance, end of period (100,059 ) —

Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
Balance, beginning of period
2
(43,801 ) (75,100 )
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax
9
(73,493 ) 37,606
Balance, end of period (117,294 ) (37,494 )

Retained earnings
Balance, beginning of period
2
977,178
632,717
Net income 330,451
208,420
Reissuance of treasury stock, net —
(21,740 )
Balance, end of period 1,307,629
819,397

Total shareholders’ equity $ 3,313,875
$ 2,995,061



MGIC INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (Unaudited)

		Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands)	Note	2019			2018			2019			2018
Common stock
Balance, beginning of period		$	371,353		$	371,348		$	371,353		$	370,567
Net common stock issued under share-based compensation plans		—			—			—			781
Balance, end of period		371,353			371,348			371,353			371,348

Paid-in capital
Balance, beginning of period		1,856,236			1,847,000			1,862,536			1,850,582
Net common stock issued under share-based compensation plans		—			—			—			(8,854		)
Reissuance of treasury stock, net under share-based compensation plans		—			—			(11,582		)	—
Equity compensation		4,342			5,251			9,624			10,523
Balance, end of period		1,860,578			1,852,251			1,860,578			1,852,251

Treasury stock
Balance, beginning of period		(169,129		)	—			(175,059		)	—
Reissuance of treasury stock, net under share-based compensation plans		—			—			5,930			—
Repurchase of common stock	12	(24,941		)	(100,059		)	(24,941		)	(100,059		)
Balance, end of period		(194,070		)	(100,059		)	(194,070		)	(100,059		)

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
Balance, beginning of period		(41,493		)	(107,760		)	(124,214		)	(43,801		)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	9	72,303			(9,534		)	155,024			(73,493		)
Balance, end of period		30,810			(117,294		)	30,810			(117,294		)

Retained earnings
Balance, beginning of period		1,799,216			1,120,815			1,647,275			977,178
Net income		167,778			186,814			319,719			330,451
Balance, end of period		1,966,994			1,307,629			1,966,994			1,307,629

Total shareholders’ equity		$	4,035,665		$	3,313,875		$	4,035,665		$	3,313,875

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 ~~2018~~2019 | 10

~~Table of contents~~

MGIC INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)

Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands) 2018 2017
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 330,451
$ 208,420
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 31,395
33,191
Deferred tax expense 92,428
106,163
Net realized investment losses 2,226
177
Loss on debt extinguishment —
65
Change in certain assets and liabilities:
Accrued investment income (1,065 ) 43
Reinsurance recoverable on loss reserves 11,423
5,710
Reinsurance recoverable on paid losses 577
(1,187 )
Premium receivable (2,168 ) 1,048
Deferred insurance policy acquisition costs 34
(918 )
Profit commission receivable (11,202 ) (4,603 )
Loss reserves (172,620 ) (251,724 )
Unearned premiums 13,225
22,273
Return premium accrual (12,200 ) (11,900 )
Income taxes payable - current (11,321 ) 32,991
Other, net (8,590 ) (14,193 )
Net cash provided by operating activities 262,593
125,556

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of investments (516,712 ) (545,319 )
Proceeds from sales of investments 25,185
166,606
Proceeds from maturity of fixed income securities 423,933
390,344
Net increase in payable for securities 13,432
3,447
Additions to property and equipment (8,256 ) (9,659 )
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities (62,418 ) 5,419

Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from revolving credit facility —
150,000
Repayment of revolving credit facility —
(150,000 )
Purchase or repayment of convertible senior notes —
(145,620 )
Payment of original issue discount - convertible senior notes —
(4,504 )
Repurchase of common stock (100,059 ) —
Payment of debt issuance costs —
(1,630 )
Payment of withholding taxes related to share-based compensation net share settlement (8,073 ) (6,723 )
Net cash used in financing activities (108,132 ) (158,477 )
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 92,043
(27,502 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 99,851
155,410
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 191,894
$ 127,908



MGIC INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)

	Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands)	2019			2018
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	319,719		$	330,451
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	23,464			31,395
Deferred tax expense	7,043			92,428
Net realized investment losses	219			2,226
Change in certain assets and liabilities:
Accrued investment income	(271		)	(1,065		)
Reinsurance recoverable on loss reserves	14,926			11,423
Reinsurance recoverable on paid losses	(13,955		)	577
Premium receivable	(2,402		)	(2,168		)
Deferred insurance policy acquisition costs	219			34
Profit commission receivable	(976		)	(11,202		)
Loss reserves	(52,117		)	(172,620		)
Unearned premiums	(8,986		)	13,225
Return premium accrual	(7,300		)	(12,200		)
Current income taxes	(2,300		)	(21,936		)
Other, net	4,328			2,025
Net cash provided by operating activities	281,611			262,593

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of investments	(677,391		)	(516,712		)
Proceeds from sales of investments	183,620			25,185
Proceeds from maturity of fixed income securities	327,818			423,933
Net increase in payable for securities	—			13,432
Additions to property and equipment	(3,280		)	(8,256		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(169,233		)	(62,418		)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Repurchase of common stock	(36,581		)	(100,059		)
Payment of withholding taxes related to share-based compensation net share settlement	(5,652		)	(8,073		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(42,233		)	(108,132		)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents	70,145			92,043
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	155,038			99,851
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	225,183		$	191,894

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 ~~2018~~2019 | 11

~~Table of contents~~

MGIC INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, ~~2018~~2019

(Unaudited)

Note 1. Nature of Business and Basis of Presentation

MGIC Investment Corporation is a holding company which, through Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corporation (“MGIC”), is principally engaged in the mortgage insurance business. We provide mortgage insurance to lenders throughout the United States and to government sponsored entities to protect against loss from defaults on low down payment residential mortgage loans. AnMGIC Assurance Corporation (“MAC”) and MGIC Indemnity Corporation (“MIC”), insurance ~~subsidiary~~subsidiaries of MGIC, ~~provides~~provide insurance for certain mortgages under Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (the “GSEs”) credit risk transfer ~~programs and is a participant in the Fannie Mae Enterprise-Paid Mortgage Insurance pilot.~~programs.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of MGIC Investment Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q as prescribed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for interim reporting and do not include all of the other information and disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). These statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, ~~2017~~2018 included in our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K. As used below, “we,” “our” and “us” refer to MGIC Investment Corporation’s consolidated operations or to MGIC Investment Corporation, as the context requires.

In the opinion of management, the accompanying financial statements include all adjustments, consisting primarily of normal recurring accruals, necessary to fairly state our consolidated financial position and consolidated results of operations for the periods indicated. The consolidated results of operations for the interim period may not be indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

Substantially all of our insurance written since 2008 has been for loans purchased by the GSEs. ~~We operate under the Private Mortgage Insurer Eligibility Requirements~~The current private mortgage insurer eligibility requirements ("PMIERs") of the GSEs ~~that became effective December 31, 2015~~include financial requirements, as well as business, quality control and ~~which have been amended from time to time.~~certain transactional approval requirements. The financial requirements of the PMIERs require a mortgage insurer’s "Available Assets" (generally only the most liquid assets of an insurer) to equal or exceed its "Minimum Required Assets" (which are based on an insurer's book of insurance in force, calculated from tables of factors with several risk dimensions and subject to a floor amount). Based on our interpretation of the PMIERs, as of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, MGIC’s Available Assets are in excess of its Minimum Required Assets; and MGIC is in compliance with the financial requirements of the PMIERs and eligible to insure loans purchased by the GSEs.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications to ~~2017~~2018 amounts have been made in the accompanying financial statements to conform to the ~~2018~~2019 presentation.

Subsequent events

We have considered subsequent events through the date of this filing. ~~Refer~~On July 25, 2019, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend to ~~Note 11 - “Income Taxes,”~~holders of the company’s common stock of $0.06 per share payable on September 20, 2019, to shareholders of record at the close of business on August 30, 2019. On August 2, 2019, we entered into an agreement to settle a claims paying practices dispute for ~~information regarding~~which we previously had recognized a probable loss. There was no additional loss recognized as a result of entering into the agreement, as the settlement amount is in line with our ~~tax settlement with~~original estimate of the ~~IRS in July 2018.~~

probable loss. The agreement remains subject to GSE approval.

Note 2. Significant Accounting Policies

Income taxes

Deferred income taxes are provided under the liability method, which recognizes the future tax effects of temporary differences between amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and the tax bases of these items. The estimated tax effects are computed at the enacted federal statutory income tax rate. Changes in tax laws, rates, regulations, and policies or the final determination of tax audits or examinations, could materially affect our estimates and can be significant to our operating results. We evaluate the realizability of the deferred tax assets based on the weight of all available positive and negative evidence. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

The recognition of a tax position is determined using a two-step approach. The first step applies a more-likely-than-not threshold for recognition and derecognition. The second step measures the tax position as the greatest amount of benefit that is cumulatively greater than 50% likely to be realized. When evaluating a tax position for recognition and measurement, we presume that the tax position will be examined by the relevant taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. We recognize interest accrued and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in our provision for income taxes.

Federal tax law permits mortgage guaranty insurance companies to deduct from taxable income, subject to certain limitations, the amounts added to contingency loss reserves that are recorded for regulatory purposes. The amounts we deduct must generally be included in taxable income in the tenth subsequent year. The deduction is allowed only to the extent that we purchase and hold U.S. government non-interest-bearing tax and loss bonds in an amount equal to the tax benefit attributable to the deduction. We account for these purchases as a payment of current federal income tax.

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 ~~2018~~2019 | 12

~~Table of contents~~

~~Note 2. New Accounting Pronouncements~~

Recent accounting and reporting developments

Accounting standards effective in ~~2018,~~2019, or early adopted, and relevant to our financial statements

~~Table~~ ~~2.1~~ ~~shows~~Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2016-02 - Leases

In February 2016, the ~~relevant amendments~~Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) amended the previous leasing standard and created ASC 842, Leases. ASC 842 requires a lessee to ~~accounting standards that have been implemented~~recognize a right-of-use asset and lease liability for substantially all leases. Effective for the ~~year beginning January 1, 2018; none had~~quarter ended March 31, 2019, we adopted the updated guidance for leases and also elected to apply all practical expedients applicable to us in the updated guidance for transition of leases in effect at adoption. The adoption of the updated guidance resulted in the recognition of an immaterial right-of-use asset as part of other assets and a lease liability as part of other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet. The adoption of the updated guidance did not have a material ~~impact~~effect on our consolidated ~~financial statements or disclosures.~~



	~~Table~~	~~2.1~~
~~Standard / Interpretation~~
~~Standard / Interpretation~~	~~Amended Standards~~				~~Effective date~~
	~~ASC 718~~		~~Compensation - Stock Compensation~~
			•	~~ASU 2017-09 - Scope of Modification Accounting~~	~~January 1, 2018~~
	~~ASC 310~~		~~Receivables - Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs~~
			•	~~ASU 2017-08 - Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities~~	~~January 1, 2019~~
	~~ASC 715~~		~~Compensation - Retirement Benefits~~
			•	~~ASU 2017-07 - Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost~~	~~January 1, 2018~~
	~~ASC 825~~		~~Financial Instruments - Overall~~
			•	~~ASU 2016-01 - Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities~~	~~January 1, 2018~~

~~Stock Compensation - Scope of Modification Accounting~~

In May 2017, the FASB issued updated guidance related to a change in the terms or conditions (modification) of a share-based award. The updated guidance provides that an entity should account for the effects of a modification unless the fair value and vesting conditions of the modified award and the classification of the award (equity or liability instrument) are the same as the original award immediately before the modification. The updated guidance addressed the diversity in practice on applying modification accounting, as some entities evaluated whether changes to awards were substantive, which is not prescribed within the current accounting guidance. The updated guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in any interim period.


◦	~~Adoption impact: The adoption of this guidance had no impact on our consolidated financial statements or disclosures.~~

~~Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities~~

In March 2017, the FASB issued updated guidance to amend the amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium, shortening the amortization period to the earliest call date. Under current GAAP, there is diversity in practice in the amortization period for premiums of callable debt securities and in how the potential for exercise of a call is factored into current impairment assessments. This updated guidance aligns with how callable debt securities, in the United States, are generally quoted, priced, and traded, which incorporates consideration of calls (also referred to as “yield-to-worst” pricing). The updated guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those annual periods.


◦	~~Adoption impact: We adopted this guidance as of January 1, 2018 with no impact to our consolidated financial statements or disclosures as our accounting policy adhered to the updated guidance.~~

~~Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost~~

In March 2017, the FASB issued updated guidance intended to improve the reporting of net benefit cost in the financial statements. The updated guidance requires that an employer report the service cost component of pension and post-retirement benefit costs in the same financial statement caption as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by employees during the period. The other components of net benefit cost are required to be presented in the statementresults of operations ~~separately from the service cost component and outside a subtotal~~or liquidity. Our minimum future operating lease payments as of ~~income from operations, if one is presented. Previous guidance did not prescribe~~June 30, 2019 totaled $2.3 million.

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 13~~

~~Table of contents~~

where the amount of net benefit cost should be presented in an employer’s statement of operations and did not require entities to disclose by line item the amount of net benefit cost that is included in the statement of operations. The updated guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual periods.

◦

Adoption impact: The adoption of this guidance had no impact on our consolidated financial statements or disclosures as the service cost component is reported in the same financial statement caption as other compensation costs and we do not present a subtotal of income outside of income from operations. The service cost component of our benefit plans is disclosed in ~~Note 10 - “Benefit Plans”~~ ~~to our consolidated financial statements.~~

~~Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities~~

In January 2016, the FASB issued updated guidance to address the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of certain financial instruments. The updated guidance requires equity investments, except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting, that have a readily determinable fair value to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. Equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values may be remeasured at fair value either upon the occurrence of an observable price change or upon identification of an impairment. A qualitative assessment for impairment is required for equity investments without readily determinable fair values. The updated guidance also eliminates the requirement to disclose the method and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet. Further, the updated guidance clarifies that entities should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale securities in combination with the entities’ other deferred tax assets. The updated guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual periods and will require recognition of a cumulative effect adjustment at adoption.

◦

Adoption impact: The adoption of this guidance resulted in an immaterial cumulative effect adjustment to our 2018 beginning accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income and retained earnings to recognize unrealized gains on equity investments. At December 31, 2017, equity investments were classified as available-for-sale on the consolidated balance sheet. Upon adoption the updated guidance eliminated the available-for-sale balance sheet classification for equity securities.

In February 2018, the FASB issued a separate update for technical corrections and improvements to clarify certain aspects of the guidance issued above. This update clarifies the presentation of investments in, among other things, Federal Home Loan Bank stock and prohibits those investments from being shown with equity securities.


◦	Adoption impact: At March 31, 2018, and periods subsequent, the value of our investment in Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago (“FHLB”) stock, which is carried at cost, is presented within “Other invested assets” on our consolidated balance sheet.

Prospective Accounting Standards

Table ~~2.2~~2.1 shows the relevant new amendments to accounting standards, which are not yet effective or adopted.



Standard / Interpretation
Table	2.1
		~~Table~~	~~2.2~~
~~Standard / Interpretation~~						Amended Standards	Effective date
~~Amended Standards~~
	ASC 326		Financial Instruments - Credit Losses
			•	ASU 2016-13 - Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments	January 1, 2020
ASC 820		Fair Value Measurement
		•	ASU 2018-13 - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurements	January 1, 2020
ASC 715		Compensation - Retirement Benefits
		•	ASU 2018-14 - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans	January 1, 2021

Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

In June 2016, the FASB issued updated guidance that requires immediate recognition of estimated credit losses expected to occur over the remaining life of many financial instruments. Entities will be required to ~~utilize a current expected credit losses (“CECL”) methodology that incorporates~~incorporate their forecast of future economic conditions into their loss estimate unless such forecast is not reasonable and supportable, in which

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 14~~

~~Table of contents~~

case the entity will revert to historical loss experience. ~~Any~~The allowance for ~~CECL~~current expected credit losses (“CECL”) generally reduces the amortized cost basis of the financial instrument to the amount an entity expects to ~~collect. Credit~~collect, however, credit losses relating to available-for-sale fixed maturity securities are to be recorded through an allowance for credit losses, ~~rather than a write-down of the asset,~~ with the amount of the allowance limited to the amount by which fair value is less than amortized cost. In addition, the length of time a security has been in an unrealized loss position will no longer impact the determination of whether a credit loss exists. The updated guidance is not prescriptive about certain aspects of estimating expected credit losses, including the specific methodology to use, and therefore will require significant judgment in application. The updated guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods

within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted for annual and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. In May 2019, the FASB amended this guidance to provide entities with an option to irrevocably elect the fair value option for eligible instruments in order to provide targeted transition relief that is intended to increase comparability of financial statement information for some entities that otherwise would have measured similar financial instruments using different measurement methodologies. The effective dates remain the same. We are currently evaluating the impacts the adoption of this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures, but do not expect it to have a material ~~impact~~impact.

Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement

In August 2018, the FASB issued updated guidance that changes the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. The updated guidance removed the requirement to disclose the amount of and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy; the policy for timing of transfers between levels; and the valuation processes for Level 3 fair value measurements. The updated guidance clarifies that the measurement uncertainty disclosure is to communicate information about the uncertainty in measurements as of the reporting date. Further, the updated guidance will require disclosure of changes in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in other comprehensive income for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements held at the end of the reporting period; and the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements. The updated guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those annual periods. An entity is permitted to early adopt any guidance that removed or modified disclosures upon issuance of this update and to delay adoption of the additional disclosures until its effective date. We are currently evaluating the impacts the adoption of this guidance will have on our consolidated financial ~~statements or disclosures.~~statement disclosures, but do not expect it to have a material impact.

Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans

In August 2018, the FASB issued amendments to modify the disclosure requirements for defined benefit plans. The updated guidance removed the requirements to identify amounts that are expected to be reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income and recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost in the coming year and the effects of a one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates on service and interest cost and on the postretirement benefit obligation. The updated guidance added disclosures for the weighted-average interest crediting rates for cash balance plans and other plans with interest crediting rates and explanations for significant gains and losses related to changes in the benefit obligation for the period. The updated guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2020. Early adoption is permitted. An entity should apply the amendments on a retrospective basis to all periods presented. We are currently evaluating the impacts the adoption of this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statement disclosures, but do not expect it to have a material impact.

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2019 | 13

Note 3. Debt

Debt obligations

The par value of our long-term debt obligations and their aggregate carrying values as of June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017~~2018 are presented in table 3.1 below.



Long-term debt obligations
Table	3.1
(In millions)		June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
FHLB Advance - 1.91%, due February 2023		$	155.0	$	155.0
5.75% Notes, due August 2023 (par value: $425 million)		420.3		419.7
9% Debentures, due April 2063 ⁽¹⁾		256.9		256.9
Long-term debt, carrying value		$	832.2	$	831.6

Table 3.1
Long-term debt obligations (In millions) June 30,
2018 December 31,
2017
FHLB Advance $ 155.0
$ 155.0
5.75% Notes 425.0
425.0

9% Debentures ⁽¹⁾
256.9
256.9
Long-term debt, par value 836.9
836.9
Debt issuance costs (5.9 ) (6.5 )
Long-term debt, carrying value $ 831.0
$ 830.4

⁽¹⁾

Convertible at any time prior to maturity at the holder’s option, at an initial conversion rate, which is subject to adjustment, of 74.0741 shares per $1,000 principal amount, representing an initial conversion price of approximately $13.50 per share. In the event of a cash dividend to all or substantially all holders of our common stock, the conversion rate shall be increased by multiplying the conversion rate in effect immediately prior to the ex-dividend date for such distribution by a fraction, (a) the numerator shall be the current market price of our common stock on the ex-dividend date; and (b) the denominator shall be the current market price of our common stock on the ex-dividend date less the amount by which the dividend per share exceeds $0.025. No adjustment in the conversion rate shall be required unless such adjustment would require an increase or decrease of at least one percent in such rate; provided that any such adjustments that are not required to be made shall be carried forward and such carry-forward adjustments shall be made, regardless of whether the aggregate adjustment is less than one percent at the end of each fiscal year, or in certain other circumstances. The conversion price per share is $1,000 divided by the conversion rate, and will change upon a change in the conversion rate. If a holder elects to convert ~~their~~its debentures, deferred interest owed on the debentures being converted is also converted into shares of our common stock. The conversion rate for any deferred interest is based on the average price that our shares traded at during a 5-day period immediately prior to the election to convert. In lieu of issuing shares of common stock upon conversion of the debentures, we may, at our option, make a cash payment to converting holders for all or some of the shares of our common stock otherwise issuable upon conversion.

The 5.75% Senior Notes (“5.75% Notes”), 9% Convertible Junior Subordinated Debentures ~~and any amounts drawn on our revolving credit facility,~~(“9% Debentures”) are obligations of our holding company, MGIC Investment Corporation, and not of its subsidiaries. ~~In addition to interest on amounts drawn, the unused portion of our revolving credit facility is subject to recurring commitment fees, which is reflected in interest payments.~~ The Federal Home Loan Bank Advance (the “FHLB Advance”) is an obligation of MGIC.

~~Table~~ ~~3.2~~ ~~below presents~~In May 2019, we terminated our $175 million unsecured revolving credit facility. At the time of termination there were no amounts drawn on the credit facility. The unused portion of our revolving credit facility was subject to recurring commitment fees, which are reflected in interest payments.

Interest payments

Interest payments ~~on our debt obligations.~~

Table 3.2
Interest payments on debt obligations Six Months Ended June 30,
(In millions) 2018 2017
Revolving credit facility $ 0.3
$ 0.5
FHLB Advance 1.5
1.5
5% Notes —
3.6
2% Notes —
2.1
5.75% Notes 12.2
12.9
9% Debentures 11.6
11.6
Total interest payments $ 25.6
$ 32.2

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2~~for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 ~~| 15~~were $25.5 million and $25.6 million, respectively.

~~Table of contents~~

Note 4. Reinsurance

The reinsurance agreements to which we ~~have entered into,~~are a party, excluding captive agreements (which were immaterial), are discussed below. The effect of all of our reinsurance agreements on premiums earned and losses incurred is shown in table 4.1 below.



Reinsurance
Table	4.1
		Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands)		2019			2018			2019			2018
Premiums earned:
Direct		$	287,183		$	268,236		$	566,796		$	533,487
Assumed		1,015			106			1,887			227
Ceded		(41,096		)	(21,378		)	(71,820		)	(54,643		)
Net premiums earned		$	247,102		$	246,964		$	496,863		$	479,071

Losses incurred:
Direct		$	25,276		$	(16,778	)	$	66,080		$	14,723
Assumed		(9		)	(100		)	(76		)	(10		)
Ceded		(3,431		)	3,423			(5,105		)	(4,318		)
Losses incurred, net		$	21,836		$	(13,455	)	$	60,899		$	10,395

Table 4.1
Effect of Reinsurance Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands) 2018 2017 2018 2017
Premiums earned:
Direct $ 268,236
$ 261,180
$ 533,487
$ 520,608
Assumed 106
62
227
160
Ceded (21,378 ) (30,106 ) (54,643 ) (60,529 )
Net premiums earned $ 246,964
$ 231,136
$ 479,071
$ 460,239

Losses incurred:
Direct $ (16,778 ) $ 31,396
$ 14,723
$ 63,809
Assumed (100 ) 61
(10 ) 166
Ceded 3,423
(4,118 ) (4,318 ) (9,017 )
Losses incurred, net $ (13,455 ) $ 27,339
$ 10,395
$ 54,958

Quota share reinsurance

We utilize quota share reinsurance transactions (“QSR Transactions”) to manage our exposure to losses resulting from our mortgage guaranty insurance policies and to provide reinsurance capital credit under the PMIERs. Each of the reinsurers under our QSR Transactions has an insurer financial strength rating of A- or better by Standard and Poor’s Rating Services, A.M. Best or both.

~~2018~~2019 QSR Transaction.We entered into a QSR transaction with a group of unaffiliated reinsurers with an effective date of January 1, ~~2018~~2019 (“~~2018~~2019 QSR Transaction”), which provides coverage on eligible new ~~business~~insurance written in ~~2018 that meets certain eligibility requirements.~~2019. Under the ~~2018~~2019 QSR Transaction, we will cede losses ~~incurred~~ and premiums on or after the effective date through December 31, ~~2029,~~2030, at which time the agreement expires. Early termination of the agreement can be elected by us effective December 31, 2021 ~~and annually~~or bi-annually thereafter, for a fee, or under specified scenarios for no fee upon prior written notice, including if we will receive less than 90% of the full credit amount under the PMIERs for the risk ceded in any required calculation period.

The structure of the ~~2018~~2019 QSR Transaction is a 30% quota share, with a one-time option, elected by us, to reduce the cede rate to either 25% or 20% effective July 1, 2020, or bi-annually thereafter, for a fee, for all policies covered, with a 20% ceding commission as well as a profit commission. Generally, under the ~~2018~~2019 QSR Transaction, we will receive a profit commission provided that the loss ratio on the loans covered under the agreement remains below 62%.

~~2017~~

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2019 | 14

2018 and prior QSR Transactions. See Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2018 Form 10-K for more information about our QSR Transactions entered into prior to 2019.

2015 QSR ~~Transactions.~~

~~Our 2017~~Transaction.We terminated a portion of our 2015 QSR Transaction effective June 30, 2019 and entered into an amended quota share reinsurance agreement ~~(“2017~~with certain participants from the existing reinsurance panel that effectively reduces the quota share cede rate from 30% to 15% on the remaining eligible insurance. During the second quarter of 2019, we incurred a termination fee of $6.8 million, which was paid in July to participants of the reinsurance panel that are not participating in the amended 2015 QSR ~~Transaction”) provides coverage on new business written January 1, 2017 through December 29, 2017 that meets certain eligibility requirements.~~Transaction. Under the ~~agreement~~amended 2015 QSR Transaction we cede losses ~~incurred~~ and premiums ~~on or after the effective date~~ through December 31, ~~2028,~~2031, at which time the agreement expires. Early termination of the amended agreement can be elected by us effective ~~December 31,~~June 30, 2021 for ano fee, or under specified scenarios, ~~for no fee upon prior written notice,~~ including if we will receive less than 90% of the full credit amount under the PMIERs for the risk ceded in any required calculation period.

~~Our 2015 quota share reinsurance agreement (“2015 QSR Transaction”) covers eligible risk in force written before 2017. The~~ Generally, under our amended 2015 QSR Transaction, cedes losses incurred and premiums through December 31, 2024, at which time the agreement expires. Early termination of the agreement can be elected by us effective December 31, 2018 for a fee, or under specified scenarios for no fee upon prior written notice,

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 16~~

~~Table of contents~~

~~including if we will receive less than 90% of the full credit amount under the PMIERs for the risk ceded in any required calculation period.~~

The structure of both the 2017 QSR Transaction and 2015 QSR Transaction is a 30% quota share for all policies covered, with a 20% ceding commission as well as a profit commission. Generally, under the QSR Transactions, we will receive a profit commission provided that the loss ratio on the ~~loans~~ covered ~~under the agreement~~loans remains below ~~60%~~68%.

Table 4.2 below presents a summary of our quota share reinsurance agreements ~~excluding captive agreements (which were immaterial),~~ for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017.~~2018.



Quota Share Reinsurance
Table	4.2
		Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands)		2019		2018			2019		2018
Ceded premiums written and earned, net of profit commission ⁽¹⁾		$	36,525	$	21,432		$	64,689	$	54,468
Ceded losses incurred		3,440		(3,735		)	5,116		4,053
Ceding commissions ⁽²⁾		13,356		12,640			26,765		25,285
Profit commission		37,021		41,769			75,902		71,958

Table 4.2
Quota share reinsurance Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands) 2018 2017 2018 2017

Ceded premiums written and earned, net of profit commission ⁽¹⁾
$ 21,432
$ 28,917
$ 54,468
$ 57,812
Ceded losses incurred (3,735 ) 4,424
4,053
9,111

Ceding commissions ⁽²⁾
12,640
12,248
25,285
24,251
Profit commission 41,769
32,325
71,958
63,442


⁽¹⁾	~~Under our QSR Transactions, premiums~~ Premiums are ceded on an earned and received basis as defined in the agreements. The three and six months ended June 30, 2019 include the $6.8 million termination fee discussed in “2015 QSR Transaction” above.


⁽²⁾	Ceding commissions are reported within Other underwriting and operating expenses, net on the consolidated statements of operations.

Under the terms of the QSR Transactions, ceded premiums, ceding commission and profit commission are settled net on a quarterly basis. The ceded ~~premium~~premiums due after deducting the related ceding commission and profit commission is reported within “Other liabilities” on the consolidated balance sheets.

The reinsurance recoverable on loss reserves related to our QSR Transactions was ~~$36.5~~$18.3 million as of June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~$39.3~~$33.2 million as of December 31, ~~2017.~~2018. The reinsurance recoverable balance is secured by funds on deposit from the reinsurers which are based on the funding requirements of PMIERs that address ceded risk.

Excess of loss reinsurance

Home Re.We have aggregate excess of loss reinsurance agreements with unaffiliated special purpose insurers domiciled in Bermuda (“Home Re Transactions”). For the reinsurance coverage periods, we retain the first layer of the respective aggregate losses, and a Home Re special purpose insurer will then provide second layer coverage up to the outstanding reinsurance coverage amount. We retain losses in excess of the outstanding reinsurance coverage amount. The aggregate excess of loss reinsurance coverage decreases over a ten-year period, subject to certain conditions, as the underlying covered mortgages amortize, principal is repaid, or mortgage insurance losses are paid. MGIC has rights to terminate the Home Re Transactions. The Home Re special purpose insurers financed the coverages by issuing mortgage insurance-linked notes (“ILNs”) to unaffiliated investors in an aggregate amount equal to the initial reinsurance coverage amounts. The notes have ten-year legal maturities and are non-recourse to any assets of MGIC or affiliates. The proceeds of the notes, which were deposited into reinsurance trusts for the benefit of MGIC, will be the source of reinsurance claim payments to MGIC and principal repayments on the ILNs.



Home Re entities
Table	4.3
(In thousands)
Home Re entity (Issue Date)		Policy Inforce Dates	Termination Option Date ⁽¹⁾	Remaining First Layer Retention		Remaining Excess of Loss Reinsurance Coverages
Home Re 2018-1 Ltd. (Oct. - 2018)		July 1, 2016 - December 31, 2017	October 25, 2025	$	168,691	$	318,636
Home Re 2019-1 Ltd. (May - 2019)		January 1, 2018 - March 31, 2019	May 25, 2026	185,730		315,739
Total				$	354,421	$	634,375


⁽¹⁾	We have the right to terminate the excess-of-loss reinsurance agreements under certain circumstances and on any payment date on or after the respective termination option date.

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2019 | 15

The reinsurance premiums ceded to each Home Re special purpose insurer are composed of coverage, initial expense and supplemental premiums. The coverage premiums are generally calculated as the difference between the amount of interest payable to Home Re on the notes it issued to raise funds to collateralize its reinsurance obligations to us, and the investment income collected on the collateral assets. The amount of monthly reinsurance coverage premium ceded will fluctuate due to change in one-month LIBOR and changes in money market rates that affect investment income collected on the assets in the reinsurance trust. As the reinsurance premium will vary based on changes in these rates, we concluded that each reinsurance agreement contains an embedded derivative that is accounted for separately as a freestanding derivative. The fair values of the derivatives at June 30, 2019, were not material to our consolidated balance sheet, and the change in fair values during the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 were not material to our consolidated statements of operations. Total ceded premiums were $4.5 million and $7.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, respectively.

At the time the Home Re Transactions were entered into, we assessed whether each Home Re entity was a variable interest entity (“VIE”). A VIE is a legal entity that does not have sufficient equity at risk to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or is structured such that equity investors lack the ability to make sufficient decisions relating to the entity’s operations through voting rights or do not substantively participate in gains and losses of the entity. We concluded that each Home Re entity is a VIE. However, given that MGIC (1) does not have the unilateral power to direct the activities that most significantly affect each Home Re entity’s economic performance and (2) does not have the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of each Home Re entity, consolidation of either Home Re entity is not required.

We are required to disclose our maximum exposure to loss, which we consider to be an amount that we could be required to record in our statements of operations, as a result of our involvement with the VIEs under our Home Re Transactions. As of June 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018, we did not have material exposure to the VIEs as we have no investment in the VIEs and had no reinsurance claim payments due from either VIE under our reinsurance agreements. We are unable to determine the timing or extent of claims from losses that are ceded under the reinsurance agreements. The VIE assets are deposited in reinsurance trusts for the benefit of MGIC that will be the source of reinsurance claim payments to MGIC. The purpose of the reinsurance trusts is to provide security to MGIC for the obligations of the VIEs under the reinsurance agreements. The trustee of the reinsurance trusts, a recognized provider of corporate trust services, has established segregated accounts within the reinsurance trusts for the benefit of MGIC, pursuant to the trust agreements. The trust agreements are governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York. If the trustee of the reinsurance trusts failed to distribute claim payments to us as provided in the reinsurance trusts, we would incur a loss related to our losses ceded under the reinsurance agreements and deemed unrecoverable. We are also unable to determine the impact such possible failure by the trustee to perform pursuant to the reinsurance trust agreements may have on our consolidated financial statements. As a result, we are unable to quantify our maximum exposure to loss related

to our involvement with the VIEs. MGIC has certain termination rights under the reinsurance agreements should its claims not be paid. We consider our exposure to loss from our reinsurance agreements with the VIEs to be remote.

The following presents the total assets of the Home Re entities as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.



Home Re total assets
Table	4.4

(In thousands)
Home Re entity (Issue date)		Total VIE Assets
June 30, 2019
Home Re 2018-01 Ltd. (Oct - 2018)		$	318,636
Home Re 2019-01 Ltd. (May - 2019)		$	315,739

December 31, 2018
Home Re 2018-01 Ltd. (Oct - 2018)		$	318,636

The assets of the Home Re special purpose insurers provide capital credit under the PMIERs financial requirements (see Note 1 - “Nature of Business and Basis of Presentation”). A decline in the assets available to pay claims would reduce the capital credit available to MGIC.

Note 5. Litigation and Contingencies

Before paying an insurance claim, we review the loan and servicing files to determine the appropriateness of the claim amount. When reviewing the files, we may determine that we have the right to rescind coverage on the loan. We refer to insurance rescissions and denials of claims collectively as “rescissions” and variations of that term. In addition, our insurance policies generally provide that we can reduce or deny a claim if the servicer did not comply with its obligations under our insurance policy. We call such reduction of claims “curtailments.” In recent quarters, an immaterial percentage of claims received in a quarter have been resolved by rescissions. In ~~each of 2017~~2018, and the first half of ~~2018,~~2019, curtailments reduced our average claim paid by approximately ~~5.6%~~5.8% and ~~6.7%~~4.7%, respectively.

Our loss reserving methodology incorporates our estimates of future rescissions, curtailments, and reversals of rescissions and curtailments. A variance between ultimate actual rescission, curtailment and reversal rates and our estimates, as a result of the outcome of litigation, settlements or other factors, could materially affect our losses.

When the insured disputes our right to rescind coverage or curtail claims, we generally engage in discussions in an attempt to settle the dispute. If we are unable to reach a settlement, the outcome of a dispute ultimately ~~would~~may be determined by legal proceedings.

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2019 | 16

Under ASC 450-20, until a liability associated with settlement discussions or legal proceedings becomes probable and can be reasonably estimated, we consider our claim payment or rescission resolved for financial reporting purposes and do not accrue an estimated loss. Where we have determined that a loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated, we have recorded our best estimate of our probable loss, including recording a probable loss of $23.5 million in the first quarter of 2019. Until settlement negotiations or legal proceedings for which we have recorded a probable loss are concluded, it is reasonably possible that we will record an additional loss. ~~If we are not able~~

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 17~~

~~Table of contents~~

~~to implement settlements we consider probable, we intend to defend MGIC vigorously against any related legal proceedings.~~

In addition to matters for which we have recorded a probable loss, we are involved in other discussions and/or proceedings with insureds with respect to our claims paying practices. Although it is reasonably possible that when all of these matters are resolved we will not prevail in all cases, we are unable to make a reasonable estimate or range of estimates of the potential liability. We estimate the maximum exposure associated with matters where a loss is reasonably possible to be approximately ~~$288 million.~~$289.0 million more than the amount of probable loss we have recorded. This estimate of maximum exposure is based upon currently available information and is subject to significant judgment, numerous assumptions and known and unknown ~~uncertainties.~~uncertainties, and will include an amount for matters for which we have recorded a probable loss until such matters are concluded. We do not consider settlements concluded until any required GSE approval for such settlements is obtained. The matters underlying the estimate of maximum exposure will change from time to time. This estimate of our maximum exposure does not include interest or consequential or exemplary damages.

Mortgage insurers, including MGIC, have been involved in litigation and regulatory actions related to alleged violations of the anti-referral fee provisions of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, which is commonly known as RESPA, and the notice provisions of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, which is commonly known as FCRA. While these proceedings in the aggregate have not resulted in material liability for MGIC, there can be no assurance that the outcome of future proceedings, if any, under these laws would not have a material adverse ~~affect~~effect on us. In addition, various regulators, including the CFPB, state insurance commissioners and state attorneys general may bring other actions seeking various forms of relief in connection with alleged violations of RESPA. The insurance law provisions of many states prohibit paying for the referral of insurance business and provide various mechanisms to enforce this prohibition. While we believe our practices are in conformity with applicable

laws and regulations, it is not possible to predict the eventual scope, duration or outcome of any such reviews or investigations nor is it possible to predict their effect on us or the mortgage insurance industry.

Through a non-insurance subsidiary, we utilize our underwriting skills to provide an outsourced underwriting service to our customers known as contract underwriting. As part of the contract underwriting activities, that subsidiary is responsible for the quality of the underwriting decisions in accordance with the terms of the contract underwriting agreements with customers. That subsidiary may be required to provide certain remedies to its customers if certain standards relating to the quality of our underwriting work are not met, and we have an established reserve for such future obligations. Claims for remedies may be made a number of years after the underwriting work was performed. The underwriting remedy expense for ~~2017~~2018 and the first six months of ~~2018~~2019 was immaterial to our consolidated financial statements.

~~See~~ ~~Note 11 – “Income Taxes”~~ ~~for a description of federal income tax contingencies.~~

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 18~~

~~Table of contents~~

Note 6. Earnings per Share

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. For purposes of calculating basic EPS, vested restricted stock and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) are considered outstanding. Diluted EPS includes the components of basic EPS and also gives effect to dilutive common stock equivalents. We calculate diluted EPS using the treasury stock method and if-converted method. Under the treasury stock method, diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if unvested ~~RSU’s~~RSUs result in the issuance of common stock. Under the if-converted method, diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if our ~~convertible debt instruments~~9% Debentures result in the issuance of common stock. The determination of potentially issuable shares does not consider the satisfaction of the conversion requirements and the shares are included in the determination of diluted EPS as of the beginning of the period, if dilutive. ~~During the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, we had 9% Debentures outstanding that could result in potentially issuable shares.~~

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2019 | 17

Table 6.1 reconciles the numerators and denominators used to calculate basic and diluted EPS.



Earnings per share
Table	6.1
		Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands, except per share data)		2019		2018		2019		2018
Basic earnings per share:
Net income		$	167,778	$	186,814	$	319,719	$	330,451
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic		355,734		368,578		355,694		369,736
Basic earnings per share		$	0.47	$	0.51	$	0.90	$	0.89

Diluted earnings per share:
Net income		$	167,778	$	186,814	$	319,719	$	330,451
Interest expense, net of tax ⁽¹⁾:
9% Debentures		4,566		4,566		9,132		9,132
Diluted income available to common shareholders		$	172,344	$	191,380	$	328,851	$	339,583

Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic		355,734		368,578		355,694		369,736
Effect of dilutive securities:
Unvested RSUs		1,841		1,275		1,913		1,472
9% Debentures		19,028		19,028		19,028		19,028
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted		376,603		388,881		376,635		390,236
Diluted earnings per share		$	0.46	$	0.49	$	0.87	$	0.87

Table 6.1
Earnings per share Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands, except per share data) 2018 2017 2018 2017
Basic earnings per share:
Net income $ 186,814
$ 118,622
$ 330,451
$ 208,420
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic 368,578
366,918
369,736
354,035
Basic earnings per share $ 0.51
$ 0.32
$ 0.89
$ 0.59

Diluted earnings per share:
Net income $ 186,814
$ 118,622
$ 330,451
$ 208,420

Interest expense, net of tax ⁽¹⁾:

2% Notes —
84
—
907
5% Notes —
427
—
1,709
9% Debentures 4,566
3,757
9,132
7,514
Diluted income available to common shareholders $ 191,380
$ 122,890
$ 339,583
$ 218,550

Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic 368,578
366,918
369,736
354,035
Effect of dilutive securities:
Unvested RSUs 1,275
1,140
1,472
1,314
2% Notes —
3,827
—
16,771
5% Notes —
3,557
—
7,154
9% Debentures 19,028
19,028
19,028
19,028
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted 388,881
394,470
390,236
398,302
Diluted earnings per share $ 0.49
$ 0.31
$ 0.87
$ 0.55


⁽¹⁾	The periods ended June 30,~~2018~~ 2019 and ~~2017~~2018 were ~~tax effected~~tax-effected at a rate of 21% ~~and 35%, respectively.~~.

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 19~~

~~Table of contents~~

Note 7. Investments

Fixed income securities

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and fair value of investments in fixed income securities classified as available-for-sale at June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017~~2018 are shown in tables 7.1a and 7.1b below.


	Table	7.1a
Details of fixed income securities by category - current year			June 30, 2018
	(In thousands)		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized (Losses) ⁽¹⁾			Fair Value
	U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies		$	135,248	$	210	$	(2,688	)	$	132,770
	Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions		2,056,724		26,099		(16,686		)	2,066,137
	Corporate debt securities		2,137,543		1,174		(42,759		)	2,095,958
	Asset backed securities (“ABS”)		71,625		—		(333		)	71,292
	Residential mortgage backed securities (“RMBS”)		174,255		41		(10,570		)	163,726
	Commercial mortgage backed securities (“CMBS”)		294,839		351		(11,847		)	283,343
	Collateralized loan obligations (“CLO”)		113,121		64		(164		)	113,021
	Total fixed income securities		4,983,355		27,939		(85,047		)	4,926,247
Details of fixed income securities by category as of June 30, 2019												Details of fixed income securities by category as of June 30, 2019
Table												7.1a
(In thousands)												(In thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized (Losses) ⁽¹⁾			Fair Value
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies												U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies	$	194,222	$	1,474	$	(127	)	$	195,569
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions												Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions	1,566,166		88,379		(648		)	1,653,897
Corporate debt securities												Corporate debt securities	2,570,289		61,459		(3,134		)	2,628,614
Asset backed securities (“ABS”)												Asset backed securities (“ABS”)	215,016		2,787		(102		)	217,701
Residential mortgage backed securities (“RMBS”)												Residential mortgage backed securities (“RMBS”)	213,024		183		(4,710		)	208,497
Commercial mortgage backed securities (“CMBS”)												Commercial mortgage backed securities (“CMBS”)	268,189		4,450		(750		)	271,889
Collateralized loan obligations (“CLO”)												Collateralized loan obligations (“CLO”)	330,530		55		(1,929		)	328,656
Total fixed income securities												Total fixed income securities	$	5,357,436	$	158,787	$	(11,400	)	$	5,504,823

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2019 | 18


	Table	7.1b
Details of fixed income securities by category - prior year-end			December 31, 2017
	(In thousands)		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized (Losses) ⁽¹⁾			Fair Value
	U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies		$	179,850	$	274	$	(1,278	)	$	178,846
	Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions		2,105,063		56,210		(8,749		)	2,152,524
	Corporate debt securities		2,065,475		10,532		(9,169		)	2,066,838
	ABS		4,925		—		(2		)	4,923
	RMBS		189,153		60		(7,364		)	181,849
	CMBS		301,014		1,204		(4,906		)	297,312
	CLOs		100,798		304		(79		)	101,023
	Total fixed income securities		4,946,278		68,584		(31,547		)	4,983,315
Details of fixed income securities by category as of December 31, 2018												Details of fixed income securities by category as of December 31, 2018
Table												7.1b
(In thousands)												(In thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized (Losses) ⁽¹⁾			Fair Value
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies												U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies	$	167,655	$	597	$	(1,076	)	$	167,176
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions												Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions	1,701,826		29,259		(10,985		)	1,720,100
Corporate debt securities												Corporate debt securities	2,439,173		2,103		(40,514		)	2,400,762
ABS												ABS	111,953		226		(146		)	112,033
RMBS												RMBS	189,238		32		(10,309		)	178,961
CMBS												CMBS	276,352		888		(9,580		)	267,660
CLOs												CLOs	310,587		2		(5,294		)	305,295
Total fixed income securities												Total fixed income securities	$	5,196,784	$	33,107	$	(77,904	)	$	5,151,987


⁽¹⁾	At June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017~~2018, there were no other-than-temporary impairment losses recorded in other comprehensive income.

We had ~~$13.4~~$13.7 million and ~~$13.6~~$13.5 million of investments at fair value on deposit with various states as of June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, respectively, due to regulatory requirements of those state insurance departments.

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 20~~

~~Table of contents~~

The amortized cost and fair values of fixed income securities at June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, by contractual maturity, are shown in table 7.2 below. ~~Expected~~Actual maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Because most ABS, RMBS, CMBS, and CLOs provide for periodic payments throughout their lives, they are listed in separate categories.



Fixed income securities maturity schedule
Table	7.2
		June 30, 2019
(In thousands)		Amortized cost		Fair Value
Due in one year or less		$	367,161	$	367,474
Due after one year through five years		1,900,096		1,930,664
Due after five years through ten years		930,951		976,031
Due after ten years		1,132,469		1,203,911
		4,330,677		4,478,080

ABS		215,016		217,701
RMBS		213,024		208,497
CMBS		268,189		271,889
CLOs		330,530		328,656
Total as of June 30, 2019		$	5,357,436	$	5,504,823

Table 7.2
Fixed income securities maturity schedule June 30, 2018
(In thousands) Amortized Cost Fair Value
Due in one year or less $ 493,653
$ 492,697
Due after one year through five years 1,560,626
1,538,297
Due after five years through ten years 984,376
961,805
Due after ten years 1,290,860
1,302,066
$ 4,329,515
$ 4,294,865

ABS 71,625
71,292
RMBS 174,255
163,726
CMBS 294,839
283,343
CLOs 113,121
113,021
Total as of June 30, 2018 $ 4,983,355
$ 4,926,247

Proceeds from sales of fixed income securities classified as available-for-sale were ~~$25.1~~$183.6 million and ~~$166.6~~$25.1 million during the six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, respectively. Gross gains of ~~$0.2~~$1.2 million and ~~$0.8~~$2.0 million and gross losses of ~~$1.0~~$1.1 million and $2.3 million were realized on those sales during the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, respectively. Gross gains of $0.1 million and $0.2 million and gross losses of $0.6 million and $1.0 million were realized on those sales during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, ~~and 2017,~~ respectively.

During the ~~three~~six months ended June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, we recorded other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) losses of ~~$1.3 million in earnings due to our intent to sell certain fixed income securities that are in an unrealized loss position.~~$0.1 million. During ~~each of~~ the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2017, there were no~~2018, we recorded OTTI losses ~~recognized.~~of $1.3 million.

Equity securities

The cost and fair value of investments in equity securities at June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017~~2018 are shown in tables 7.3a and 7.3b below. ~~As described in~~ ~~Note 2~~



Details of equity security investments as of June 30, 2019
Table	7.3a
(In thousands)		Cost		Gross Gains		Gross Losses			Fair Value
Equity securities		$	3,991	$	129	$	(6	)	$	4,114

MGIC Investment Corporation - ~~“New Accounting Pronouncements,”~~ ~~under updated guidance regarding~~Q2 2019 | 19



Details of equity security investments as of December 31, 2018
Table	7.3b
(In thousands)		Cost		Gross Gains		Gross Losses			Fair Value
Equity securities		$	3,993	$	11	$	(72	)	$	3,932

For the “~~Recognition~~three and ~~Measurement~~six months ended June 30, 2019, we recognized $0.1 million and $0.2 million of ~~Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” which~~ ~~became effective~~net gains on ~~January 1, 2018, the~~ ~~amount of our FHLB stock investment has been reclassified and presented in~~ ~~“Other invested assets”~~ ~~on our consolidated balance sheet~~equity securities still held as of June 30, ~~2018.~~

Table 7.3a
Details of equity security investments - current year June 30, 2018
(In thousands) Cost Gross Gains Gross Losses Fair Value
Equity securities $ 4,111
$ 8
$ (71 ) $ 4,048

Table 7.3b
Details of equity security investments - prior year-end December 31, 2017
(In thousands) Cost Gross Gains Gross Losses Fair Value
Equity securities $ 7,223
$ 39
$ (16 ) $ 7,246

2019. For the six months ended June 30, 2018,, we recognized ~~$0.1~~$0.1 million of net losses on equity securities still held as of June 30, ~~2018~~.2018.

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 21~~

~~Table of contents~~

Other invested assets

Other invested assets include an investment in ~~FHLB~~Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) stock that is carried at cost, which due to its nature approximates fair value. Ownership of FHLB stock provides access to a secured lending facility, and our current FHLB Advance amount is secured by eligible collateral whose fair value is maintained at a minimum of 102% of the outstanding principal balance. As of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, that collateral ~~consisting~~consisted of fixed income securities included in our total investment portfolio, and cash and cash equivalents, ~~had~~with a total fair value of ~~$166.1~~$163.0 million.

Unrealized investment losses

Tables 7.4a and 7.4b below summarize, for all available-for-sale investments in an unrealized loss position at June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, the aggregate fair value and gross unrealized loss by the length of time those securities have been continuously in an unrealized loss position. The fair value amounts reported in tables 7.4a and 7.4b are estimated using the process described in Note 8 - “Fair Value Measurements” to these consolidated financial statements and in Note 3 - “Significant Accounting Policies” of the notes to the consolidated financial statements in our ~~2017~~2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Unrealized loss aging for securities by type and length of time as of June 30, 2019																		Unrealized loss aging for securities by type and length of time as of June 30, 2019
Table																		7.4a
	Table	7.4a																	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or Greater					Total
Investments unrealized losses - current year			June 30, 2018
			Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or Greater					Total
	(In thousands)		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
	U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies		$	85,817	$	(1,826	)	$	34,027	$	(862	)	$	119,844	$	(2,688	)
	Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions		778,354		(9,776		)	207,827		(6,910		)	986,181		(16,686		)
	Corporate debt securities		1,787,815		(34,534		)	176,254		(8,225		)	1,964,069		(42,759		)
	ABS		71,293		(333		)	—		—			71,293		(333		)
	RMBS		5,099		(163		)	158,215		(10,407		)	163,314		(10,570		)
	CMBS		121,944		(3,098		)	130,590		(8,749		)	252,534		(11,847		)
	CLOs		57,962		(138		)	1,182		(26		)	59,144		(164		)
	Total		$	2,908,284	$	(49,868	)	$	708,095	$	(35,179	)	$	3,616,379	$	(85,047	)
(In thousands)																		(In thousands)	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies																		U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies	$	12,483	$	(19	)	$	45,423	$	(108	)	$	57,906	$	(127	)
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions																		Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions	2,283		(468		)	57,193		(180		)	59,476		(648		)
Corporate debt securities																		Corporate debt securities	29,333		(1,987		)	298,419		(1,147		)	327,752		(3,134		)
ABS																		ABS	9,257		(102		)	—		—			9,257		(102		)
RMBS																		RMBS	32,181		(297		)	158,325		(4,413		)	190,506		(4,710		)
CMBS																		CMBS	—		—			78,697		(750		)	78,697		(750		)
CLOs																		CLOs	247,983		(1,587		)	45,137		(342		)	293,120		(1,929		)
Total																		Total	$	333,520	$	(4,460	)	$	683,194	$	(6,940	)	$	1,016,714	$	(11,400	)



Unrealized loss aging for securities by type and length of time as of December 31, 2018
Table	7.4b
		Less Than 12 Months						12 Months or Greater					Total
(In thousands)		Fair Value			Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies		$	23,710		$	(15	)	$	69,146	$	(1,061	)	$	92,856	$	(1,076	)
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions		316,655		��	(3,875		)	358,086		(7,110		)	674,741		(10,985		)
Corporate debt securities		1,272,279			(18,130		)	785,627		(22,384		)	2,057,906		(40,514		)
ABS		51,324			(146		)	—		—			51,324		(146		)
RMBS		24			—			178,573		(10,309		)	178,597		(10,309		)
CMBS		65,704			(1,060		)	163,272		(8,520		)	228,976		(9,580		)
CLOs		296,497			(5,294		)	—		—			296,497		(5,294		)
Total		$	2,026,193		$	(28,520	)	$	1,554,704	$	(49,384	)	$	3,580,897	$	(77,904	)

Table 7.4b
Investments unrealized losses - prior year-end December 31, 2017
Less Than 12 Months 12 Months or Greater Total
(In thousands) Fair Value
Unrealized
Losses
Fair Value
Unrealized
Losses
Fair Value
Unrealized
Losses
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies $ 144,042
$ (796 ) $ 31,196
$ (482 ) $ 175,238
$ (1,278 )
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions 505,311
(3,624 ) 211,684
(5,125 ) 716,995
(8,749 )
Corporate debt securities 932,350
(4,288 ) 200,716
(4,881 ) 1,133,066
(9,169 )
ABS 4,923
(2 ) —
—
4,923
(2 )
RMBS 14,979
(280 ) 166,329
(7,084 ) 181,308
(7,364 )
CMBS 51,096
(358 ) 138,769
(4,548 ) 189,865
(4,906 )
CLOs 14,243
(7 ) 3,568
(72 ) 17,811
(79 )
Equity securities 226
(2 ) 431
(14 ) 657
(16 )
Total $ 1,667,170
$ (9,357 ) $ 752,693
$ (22,206 ) $ 2,419,863
$ (31,563 )

The unrealized losses in all categories of our investments at June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017~~2018 were primarily caused by changes in interest rates between the time of purchase and the respective fair value measurement date. There were ~~867~~243 and ~~586~~721 securities in an unrealized loss position at June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, respectively.

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 ~~2018~~2019 | 2220

~~Table of contents~~

Note 8. Fair Value Measurements

Recurring fair value measurements

~~In accordance with~~The following describes the valuation methodologies generally used by the independent pricing sources, or by us, to measure financial instruments at fair value, ~~accounting guidance, we applied~~including the ~~following fair value hierarchy~~general classification of such financial instruments pursuant to ~~measure fair value for assets and liabilities:~~the valuation hierarchy.

Level 1 ~~- Quoted~~measurements

Fixed income securities: Consist of primarily U.S. Treasury securities with valuations derived from quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets that we can access. ~~Financial assets utilizing Level 1 inputs primarily include U.S. Treasury~~

Equity securities: Consist of actively traded, exchange-listed equity securities ~~and equity securities.~~

~~Level 2 - Quoted~~with valuations derived from quoted prices for ~~similar instruments~~identical assets in active markets that we can ~~access;~~access.

Other: Consists of money market funds with valuations derived from quoted prices for identical ~~or similar instruments~~assets in active markets that we can access.

Level 2 measurements

Fixed income securities:

Corporate Debt & U.S. Government and Agency Bondsare ~~not active;~~valued by surveying the dealer community, obtaining relevant trade data, benchmark quotes and spreads and incorporating this information into the valuation process.

Obligations of U.S. States & Political Subdivisions are valued by tracking, capturing, and analyzing quotes for active issues and trades reported via the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board records. Daily briefings and reviews of current economic conditions, trading levels, spread relationships, and the slope of the yield curve provide further data for evaluation.

Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities ("RMBS") are valued by monitoring interest rate movements, and other pertinent data daily. Incoming market data is enriched to derive spread, yield and/or price data as appropriate, enabling known data points to be extrapolated for valuation application across a range of related securities.

Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities ("CMBS") are valued using techniques that reflect market participants’ assumptions and maximize the use of relevant observable inputs ~~other than~~including quoted prices ~~that~~for similar assets, benchmark yield curves and market corroborated inputs. Evaluation uses regular reviews of the inputs for securities covered, including executed trades, broker quotes, credit information, collateral attributes and/or cash flow waterfall as applicable.

Asset-Backed Securities ("ABS") are ~~observable~~valued using spreads and other information solicited from market buy-and-sell-side sources, including primary and secondary dealers, portfolio managers, and research analysts. Cash flows are generated for each tranche, benchmark yields are determined, and deal collateral performance and tranche level attributes including trade activity, bids, and offers are applied, resulting in tranche specific prices.

Collateralized loan obligations ("CLO") are valued by evaluating manager rating, seniority in the ~~marketplace~~capital structure, assumptions about prepayment, default and recovery and their impact on cash flow generation. Loan level net asset values are determined and aggregated for ~~the instrument. The observable inputs~~tranches and as a final step prices are used in valuation models to calculate the fair value based on the type of instrument. Financial assets utilizing Level 2 inputs primarily include obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies, corporate bonds, mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities, and most municipal bonds.checked against available recent trade activity.

Level 3 - Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or value drivers are unobservable. The inputs used to derive the fair value of Level 3 securities reflect our own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing an asset or liability. Our non-financial assets that are classified as Level 3 securities consist of realmeasurements

Real estate acquired ~~through claim settlement. The fair value of real estate acquired~~ is valued at the lower of our acquisition cost or a percentage of the appraised value. The percentage applied to the appraised value is based upon our historical sales experience adjusted for current trends.

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2019 | 21

Assets measured at fair value, by hierarchy level, as of June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017~~2018 are shown in tables 8.1a and 8.1b below. The fair value of the assets is estimated using the process described above, and more fully in Note 3 - “Significant Accounting Policies” of the notes to the consolidated financial statements in our ~~2017~~2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Table 8.1a
Fair value hierarchy - current year June 30, 2018
(In thousands) Total Fair Value
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)

Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies $ 132,770
$ 18,922
$ 113,848
$ —
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions 2,066,137
—
2,065,945
192
Corporate debt securities 2,095,958
—
2,095,958
—
ABS 71,292
—
71,292
—
RMBS 163,726
—
163,726
—
CMBS 283,343
—
283,343
—
CLOs 113,021
—
113,021
—
Total fixed income securities 4,926,247
18,922
4,907,133
192

Equity securities ⁽¹⁾
4,048
2,880
—
1,168
Total investments at fair value $ 4,930,295
$ 21,802
$ 4,907,133
$ 1,360

Real estate acquired ⁽²⁾
$ 13,321
$ —
$ —
$ 13,321

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 23~~

~~Table of contents~~



Assets carried at fair value by hierarchy level as of June 30, 2019
Table	8.1a
(In thousands)		Total Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies		$	195,569	$	42,825	$	152,744	$	—
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions		1,653,897		—		1,653,897		—
Corporate debt securities		2,628,614		—		2,628,614		—
ABS		217,701		—		217,701		—
RMBS		208,497		—		208,497		—
CMBS		271,889		—		271,889		—
CLOs		328,656		—		328,656		—
Total fixed income securities		5,504,823		42,825		5,461,998		—
Equity securities		4,114		4,114		—		—
Other ⁽¹⁾		169,584		169,584		—		—
Real estate acquired ⁽²⁾		10,250		—		—		10,250
Total		$	5,688,771	$	216,523	$	5,461,998	$	10,250


	Table	8.1b
Fair value hierarchy - prior year-end			December 31, 2017
	(In thousands)		Total Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies		$	178,846	$	81,598	$	97,248	$	—
	Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions		2,152,524		—		2,152,253		271
	Corporate debt securities		2,066,838		—		2,066,838		—
	ABS		4,923		—		4,923		—
	RMBS		181,849		—		181,849		—
	CMBS		297,312		—		297,312		—
	CLOs		101,023		—		101,023		—
	Total fixed income securities		4,983,315		81,598		4,901,446		271
	Equity securities ⁽¹⁾		7,246		2,978		—		4,268
	Total investments at fair value		$	4,990,561	$	84,576	$	4,901,446	$	4,539
	Real estate acquired ⁽²⁾		$	12,713	$	—	$	—	$	12,713
Assets carried at fair value by hierarchy level as of December 31, 2018											Assets carried at fair value by hierarchy level as of December 31, 2018
Table											8.1b
(In thousands)											(In thousands)	Total Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies											U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies	$	167,176	$	42,264	$	124,912	$	—
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions											Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions	1,720,100		—		1,720,087		13
Corporate debt securities											Corporate debt securities	2,400,762		—		2,400,762		—
ABS											ABS	112,033		—		112,033		—
RMBS											RMBS	178,961		—		178,961		—
CMBS											CMBS	267,660		—		267,660		—
CLOs											CLOs	305,295		—		305,295		—
Total fixed income securities											Total fixed income securities	5,151,987		42,264		5,109,710		13
Equity securities											Equity securities	3,932		3,932		—		—
Other ⁽¹⁾											Other ⁽¹⁾	96,403		96,403		—		—
Real estate acquired ⁽²⁾											Real estate acquired ⁽²⁾	14,535		—		—		14,535
Total											Total	$	5,266,857	$	142,599	$	5,109,710	$	14,548

⁽¹⁾

~~Equity securities in Level 3 are carried at cost, which approximates fair value. See~~ ~~“Reconciliations~~Consists of ~~Level 3 assets”~~ ~~below for information regarding a change in presentation of amounts previously~~money market funds included in ~~Level 3 Equity securities.~~

“Cash and Cash Equivalents” and “Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents” on the consolidated balance sheets.


⁽²⁾	Real estate acquired through claim settlement, which is held for sale, is reported in ~~Other assets~~“Other assets” on the consolidated balance sheets.

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2019 | 22

Reconciliations of Level 3 assets

For assets measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018 is shown in tables 8.2a ~~and~~ ~~8.2b~~ ~~and~~ ~~8.3a~~ ~~and~~ ~~8.3b~~ through 8.2d below. ~~As described in Note 2 - “New Accounting Pronouncements,” under updated guidance regarding the~~ ~~Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities~~ ~~which became effective on January 1, 2018, our investment in FHLB stock is no longer presented with~~ ~~equity securities. Prior to the updated guidance, our FHLB stock was included in our Level 3 equity securities.~~ As shown in table ~~8.3a~~8.2d below, ~~for the six months ended June 30, 2018,~~ we ~~have~~ transferred our FHLB stock out of Level 3 assets, and it is carried at cost, which approximates fair value, on our consolidated balance sheet in “Other invested ~~assets”~~ ~~as of June 30, 2018.~~assets.” There were no losses included in earnings for those periods attributable to the change in unrealized losses on assets still held at the end of the applicable period.

Table 8.2a
Development of assets and liabilities classified within level 3 - current year quarter Three Months Ended June 30, 2018
(In thousands) Debt Securities Equity Securities Total Investments Real Estate Acquired
Balance at March 31, 2018 $ 254
$ 1,168
$ 1,422
$ 10,078
Total realized gains (losses):

Included in earnings and reported as losses incurred, net —
—
—
(996 )
Purchases —
—
—
10,869
Sales (62 ) —
(62 ) (6,630 )
Balance at June 30, 2018 $ 192
$ 1,168
$ 1,360
$ 13,321



Fair value roll-forward for financial instruments classified as Level 3 for the three months ended June 30, 2019
Table	8.2a
(In thousands)		Fixed income		Equity Securities		Total Investments		Real Estate Acquired
Balance at March 31, 2019		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	11,639
Purchases		—		—		—		7,107
Sales		—		—		—		(8,152		)
Included in earnings and reported as losses incurred, net		—		—		—		(344		)
Balance at June 30, 2019		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	10,250



Fair value roll-forward for financial instruments classified as Level 3 for the six months ended June 30, 2019
Table	8.2b
(In thousands)		Fixed income			Equity Securities		Total Investments			Real Estate Acquired
Balance at December 31, 2018		$	13		$	—	$	13		$	14,535
Purchases		—			—		—			15,191
Sales		(13		)	—		(13		)	(19,024		)
Included in earnings and reported as losses incurred, net		—			—		—			(452		)
Balance at June 30, 2019		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	10,250

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 24~~

~~Table of contents~~



Fair value roll-forward for financial instruments classified as Level 3 for the three months ended June 30, 2018
Table	8.2c
(In thousands)		Fixed income			Equity Securities		Total Investments			Real Estate Acquired
Balance at March 31, 2018		254			1,168		1,422			10,078
Purchases		—			—		—			10,869
Sales		(62		)	—		(62		)	(6,630		)
Included in earnings and reported as losses incurred, net		—			—		—			(996		)
Balance at June 30, 2018		$	192		$	1,168	$	1,360		$	13,321



Fair value roll-forward for financial instruments classified as Level 3 for the six months ended June 30, 2018
Table	8.2d
(In thousands)		Fixed income			Equity Securities			Total Investments			Real Estate Acquired
Balance at December 31, 2017		271			4,268			4,539			12,713
Transfers out of Level 3		—			(3,100		)	(3,100		)	—
Purchases		—			—			—			16,763
Sales		(79		)	—			(79		)	(15,500		)
Included in earnings and reported as losses incurred, net		—			—			—			(655		)
Balance at June 30, 2018		$	192		$	1,168		$	1,360		$	13,321

Table 8.2b
Development of assets and liabilities classified within level 3 - prior year quarter Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
(In thousands) Debt
Securities Equity
Securities Total
Investments Real Estate
Acquired
Balance at March 31, 2017 $ 683
$ 4,268
$ 4,951
$ 10,730
Total realized gains (losses):

Included in earnings and reported as losses incurred, net —
—
—
(63 )
Purchases —
—
—
9,421
Sales (106 ) —
(106 ) (9,817 )
Balance at June 30, 2017 $ 577
$ 4,268
$ 4,845
$ 10,271

Table 8.3a
Development of assets and liabilities classified within level 3 - current year to date Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
(In thousands) Debt Securities Equity Securities Total Investments Real Estate Acquired
Balance at December 31, 2017 $ 271
$ 4,268
$ 4,539
$ 12,713
Transfers out of Level 3 —
(3,100 ) (3,100 ) —
Total realized gains (losses):

Included in earnings and reported as losses incurred, net —
—
—
(655 )
Purchases —
—
—
16,763
Sales (79 ) —
(79 ) (15,500 )
Balance at June 30, 2018 $ 192
$ 1,168
$ 1,360
$ 13,321

Table 8.3b
Development of assets and liabilities classified within level 3 - prior year to date Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
(In thousands) Debt
Securities Equity
Securities Total
Investments Real Estate
Acquired
Balance at December 31, 2016 $ 691
$ 4,268
$ 4,959
$ 11,748
Total realized gains (losses):

Included in earnings and reported as losses incurred, net —
—
—
(226 )
Purchases —
—
—
18,104
Sales (114 ) —
(114 ) (19,355 )
Balance at June 30, 2017 $ 577
$ 4,268
$ 4,845
$ 10,271

Certain financial instruments, including insurance contracts, are excluded from these fair value disclosure requirements. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents (Level 1) and accrued investment income (Level 2) approximated their fair values. Additional fair value disclosures related to our investment portfolio are included in Note 7 – “Investments.”

Financial assets and liabilities not measured at fair value

~~We incur financial liabilities~~Other invested assets include an investment in FHLB stock that is carried at cost, which due to restrictions that require it to be redeemed or sold only to the ~~normal course of our business. Table 8.4 presents the carrying~~security issuer at par value, ~~and~~approximates fair value. The fair value of other invested assets is categorized as Level 2.

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2019 | 23

Financial liabilities include our ~~financial liabilities disclosed, but not carried, at fair value at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.~~outstanding debt obligations. The fair values of our 5.75% Notes and 9% Debentures were based on observable market prices. The fair value of the FHLB Advance was estimated using ~~discounted~~ cash flows ondiscounted at current incremental borrowing rates for similar borrowing arrangements. In all cases the fair values of the financial liabilities below are categorized as Level 2.

Table 8.3 presents the carrying value and fair value of our financial assets and liabilities disclosed, but not carried, at fair value at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.



Financial assets and liabilities not measured at fair value
Table	8.3
		June 30, 2019				December 31, 2018
(In thousands)		Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value
Financial assets
Other invested assets		$	3,100	$	3,100	$	3,100	$	3,100

Financial liabilities
FHLB Advance		$	155,000	$	155,690	$	155,000	$	150,551
5.75% Senior Notes		420,290		462,702		419,713		425,791
9% Convertible Junior Subordinated Debentures		256,872		340,669		256,872		338,069
Total financial liabilities		$	832,162	$	959,061	$	831,585	$	914,411

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 25~~

~~Table of contents~~

Table 8.4
Fair value measurements - liabilities June 30, 2018 December 31, 2017
(In thousands) Carrying Value Fair Value Carrying Value Fair Value
FHLB Advance $ 155,000
$ 149,135
$ 155,000
$ 152,124
5.75% Notes 419,136
434,422
418,560
465,473
9% Debentures 256,872
344,946
256,872
353,507
Total financial liabilities $ 831,008
$ 928,503
$ 830,432
$ 971,104

Note 9. Other Comprehensive Income

The pretax and related income tax (expense) benefit components of our other comprehensive income (loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018 are included in table 9.1 below.



Components of other comprehensive income (loss)
Table	9.1
		Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands)		2019			2018			2019			2018
Net unrealized investment gains (losses) arising during the period		$	89,562		$	(12,558	)	$	192,183		$	(94,145	)
Income tax (expense) benefit		(18,808		)	2,636			(40,358		)	19,770
Net of taxes		70,754			(9,922		)	151,825			(74,375		)

Net changes in benefit plan assets and obligations		1,961			491			4,050			1,116
Income tax expense		(412		)	(103		)	(851		)	(234		)
Net of taxes		1,549			388			3,199			882

Total other comprehensive income (loss)		91,523			(12,067		)	196,233			(93,029		)
Total income tax (expense) benefit		(19,220		)	2,533			(41,209		)	19,536
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		$	72,303		$	(9,534	)	$	155,024		$	(73,493	)

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2019 | 24

Table 9.1
Components of other comprehensive (loss) income Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands) 2018 2017 2018 2017
Net unrealized investment (losses) gains arising during the period $ (12,558 ) $ 39,614
$ (94,145 ) $ 58,261
Income tax benefit (expense) 2,636
(13,865 ) 19,770
(20,391 )
Net of taxes (9,922 ) 25,749
(74,375 ) 37,870

Net changes in benefit plan assets and obligations 491
(220 ) 1,116
(454 )
Income tax (expense) benefit (103 ) 78
(234 ) 159
Net of taxes 388
(142 ) 882
(295 )

Net changes in unrealized foreign currency translation adjustment —
—
—
45
Income tax (expense) —
—
—
(14 )
Net of taxes —
—
—
31

Total other comprehensive (loss) income (12,067 ) 39,394
(93,029 ) 57,852
Total income tax benefit (expense) 2,533
(13,787 ) 19,536
(20,246 )
Total other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax $ (9,534 ) $ 25,607
$ (73,493 ) $ 37,606

The pretax and related income tax benefit (expense) components of the amounts reclassified from our accumulated other comprehensive ~~loss~~income (loss) (“~~AOCL”~~AOCI”) to our consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018 are included in table 9.2 below.



Reclassifications from AOCI
Table	9.2
		Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands)		2019			2018			2019			2018
Reclassification adjustment for net realized gains (losses) ⁽¹⁾		$	1,701		$	(3,621	)	$	(978	)	$	(3,712	)
Income tax (expense) benefit		(357		)	760			206			779
Net of taxes		1,344			(2,861		)	(772		)	(2,933		)

Reclassification adjustment related to benefit plan assets and obligations ⁽²⁾		(1,961		)	(491		)	(4,050		)	(1,116		)
Income tax benefit		412			103			851			234
Net of taxes		(1,549		)	(388		)	(3,199		)	(882		)

Total reclassifications		(260		)	(4,112		)	(5,028		)	(4,828		)
Total income tax benefit		55			863			1,057			1,013
Total reclassifications, net of tax		$	(205	)	$	(3,249	)	$	(3,971	)	$	(3,815	)

Table 9.2
Reclassifications from AOCL Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands) 2018 2017 2018 2017

Reclassification adjustment for net realized (losses) ⁽¹⁾
$ (3,621 ) $ (1,392 ) $ (3,712 ) $ (2,139 )
Income tax benefit 760
487
779
748
Net of taxes (2,861 ) (905 ) (2,933 ) (1,391 )

Reclassification adjustment related to benefit plan assets and obligations ⁽²⁾
(491 ) 220
(1,116 ) 454
Income tax benefit (expense) 103
(78 ) 234
(159 )
Net of taxes (388 ) 142
(882 ) 295

Total reclassifications (4,112 ) (1,172 ) (4,828 ) (1,685 )
Total income tax benefit 863
409
1,013
589
Total reclassifications, net of tax $ (3,249 ) $ (763 ) $ (3,815 ) $ (1,096 )


⁽¹⁾	Increases (decreases) Net realized investment (losses) gains on the consolidated statements of operations.


⁽²⁾	Decreases (increases) Other underwriting and operating expenses, net on the consolidated statements of operations.

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 26~~

~~Table of contents~~

A rollforward of ~~AOCL~~AOCI for the six months ended June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, including amounts reclassified from ~~AOCL,~~AOCI, are included in table 9.3 below.



Rollforward of AOCI
Table	9.3
		Six Months Ended June 30, 2019
(In thousands)		Net unrealized gains and (losses) on available-for-sale securities			Net benefit plan assets and (obligations) recognized in shareholders' equity			Total accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
Balance, December 31, 2018, net of tax		$	(35,389	)	$	(88,825	)	$	(124,214	)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications		151,053			—			151,053
Less: Amounts reclassified from AOCI		(772		)	(3,199		)	(3,971		)
Balance, June 30, 2019, net of tax		$	116,436		$	(85,626	)	$	30,810

Table 9.3
Rollforward of AOCL Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
(In thousands) Net unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities Net benefit plan assets and obligations recognized in shareholders' equity Total AOCL
Balance, December 31, 2017, net of tax $ 29,257
$ (73,058 ) $ (43,801 )
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications (77,308 ) —
(77,308 )
Less: Amounts reclassified from AOCL (2,933 ) (882 ) (3,815 )
Balance, June 30, 2018, net of tax $ (45,118 ) $ (72,176 ) $ (117,294 )

Note 10. Benefit Plans

Tables 10.1 and 10.2 provide the components of net periodic benefit cost for our pension, supplemental executive retirement and other postretirement benefit plans for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017.~~2018.

Table 10.1
Components of net periodic benefit cost Three Months Ended June 30,
Pension and Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
(In thousands) 2018 2017 2018 2017
Service cost $ 2,703
$ 2,484
$ 310
$ 220
Interest cost 3,765
3,879
203
186
Expected return on plan assets (5,555 ) (5,013 ) (1,591 ) (1,312 )
Recognized net actuarial loss 1,684
1,549
(79 ) —
Amortization of prior service cost (88 ) (106 ) (1,026 ) (1,663 )
Net periodic benefit cost (benefit) $ 2,509
$ 2,793
$ (2,183 ) $ (2,569 )



Components of net periodic benefit cost
Table	10.1
		Three Months Ended June 30,
		Pension and Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans						Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
(In thousands)		2019			2018			2019			2018
Service cost		$	2,176		$	2,703		$	360		$	310
Interest cost		3,898			3,765			274			203
Expected return on plan assets		(4,825		)	(5,555		)	(1,447		)	(1,591		)
Amortization of net actuarial losses/(gains)		2,039			1,684			—			(79		)
Amortization of prior service cost/(credit)		(70		)	(88		)	(9		)	(1,026		)
Net periodic benefit cost (benefit)		$	3,218		$	2,509		$	(822	)	$	(2,183	)

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2019 | 25

Table 10.2
Components of net periodic benefit cost Six Months Ended June 30,
Pension and Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
(In thousands) 2018 2017 2018 2017
Service cost $ 5,265
$ 4,778
$ 580
$ 407
Interest cost 7,547
7,737
417
353
Expected return on plan assets (11,125 ) (10,049 ) (3,179 ) (2,624 )
Recognized net actuarial loss 3,469
3,084
(125 ) —
Amortization of prior service cost (175 ) (213 ) (2,052 ) (3,325 )
Net periodic benefit cost (benefit) $ 4,981
$ 5,337
$ (4,359 ) $ (5,189 )



Components of net periodic benefit cost
Table	10.2
		Six Months Ended June 30,
		Pension and Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans						Other Postretirement Benefits
(in thousands)		2019			2018			2019			2018
Service cost		$	4,172		$	5,265		$	672		$	580
Interest cost		7,853			7,547			565			417
Expected return on plan assets		(9,733		)	(11,125		)	(2,892		)	(3,179		)
Recognized net actuarial gain (loss)		4,206			3,469			—			(125		)
Amortization of prior service cost		(140		)	(175		)	(17		)	(2,052		)
Net period benefit cost (benefit)		$	6,358		$	4,981		$	(1,672	)	$	(4,359	)

We currently intend to make contributions totaling ~~$11~~$10.2 million to our qualified pension plan and supplemental executive retirement plan in ~~2018.~~2019.

Note 11. ~~Income Taxes~~

We have approximately $344.0 million of net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards as of June 30, 2018. Any unutilized carryforwards are scheduled to expire at the end of tax years 2032 through 2033.

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 27~~

~~Table of contents~~

We evaluate the realizability of our deferred tax assets including our NOL carryforwards on a quarterly basis. Based on our analysis, we have concluded that all of our deferred tax assets are fully realizable and therefore no valuation allowance existed at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

~~Tax Contingencies~~

As previously disclosed, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) completed examinations of our federal income tax returns for the years 2000 through 2007 and issued proposed assessments for taxes, interest and penalties related to our treatment of the flow-through income and loss from an investment in a portfolio of residual interests of Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduits.

In July 2018, we finalized an agreement with the IRS to settle all issues in the examination and related U.S. Tax Court case; the settlement has been approved by the U.S. Tax Court. The expected impact of the agreed upon settlement was previously reflected in our consolidated financial statements.

Our total amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of June 30, 2018 is $144.9 million, which represents the tax benefits generated by the REMIC portfolio included in our tax returns that we have not taken benefit for in our financial statements, including any related interest. Based on the finalized agreement with the IRS, our total unrecognized tax benefits will be reduced by $144.9 million during the second half of 2018. After taking into account prior payments and the effect of available net operating loss carrybacks, we expect net cash outflows for federal and state income taxes and interest associated with our settlement will be approximately $57 million.

~~Note 12.~~ Loss Reserves

We establish reserves to recognize the estimated liability for losses and loss adjustment expenses (“LAE”) related to defaults on insured mortgage loans. Loss reserves are established by estimating the number of loans in our inventory of delinquent loans that will result in a claim payment, which is referred to as the claim rate, and further estimating the amount of the claim payment, which is referred to as claim severity.

Estimation of losses is inherently judgmental. The conditions that affect the claim rate and claim severity include the current and future state of the domestic economy, including unemployment and the current and future strength of local housing markets; exposure on insured loans; the amount of time between default and claim filing; and curtailments and rescissions. The actual amount of the claim payments may be substantially different than our loss reserve estimates. Our estimates could be adversely affected by several factors, including a deterioration of regional or national economic conditions, including unemployment, leading to a reduction in borrowers’ income and thus their ability to make mortgage payments, and a drop in housing values which may affect borrower willingness to continue to make mortgage payments when the value of the home is below the mortgage balance. Changes to our estimates could result in a material impact to our consolidated results of operations and financial position, even in a stable economic environment.

The “Losses incurred” section of table ~~12.1~~11.1 below shows losses incurred on delinquencies that occurred in the current year and in prior years. The amount of losses incurred relating to delinquencies that occurred in the current year represents the estimated amount to be ultimately paid on such delinquencies. The amount of losses incurred relating to delinquencies that occurred in prior years represents the difference between the actual claim rate and severity associated with those delinquencies resolved in the current year compared to the estimated claim rate and severity at the prior year-end, as well as a re-estimation of amounts to be ultimately paid on delinquencies continuing from the end of the prior year. This re-estimation of the claim rate and severity is the result of our review of current trends in the delinquent inventory, such as percentages of delinquencies that have resulted in a claim, the

amount of the claims relative to the average loan exposure, changes in the relative level of delinquencies by geography and changes in average loan exposure.

Losses incurred on delinquencies that occurred in the current year decreased in the first six months of ~~2018~~2019 compared to the same period in ~~2017, primarily~~2018, due to a decrease in the number of new delinquencies, net of related cures and a decrease in the estimated claim rate on delinquencies that occurred in the current ~~year and a decrease in the number of new delinquencies, net of related cures.~~year.

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 28~~

~~Table of contents~~

For the six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, we experienced favorable loss reserve development on previously received ~~delinquencies,~~delinquencies. This was, in large part, due to the resolution of approximately ~~51%~~49% and ~~48%~~51%, respectively, of the prior year delinquent inventory, with lower claim rates due to improved cure rates. The favorable loss reserve development resulting from a reduction in the estimated claim rate was partially offset in ~~each~~the six months ended June 30, 2019 by the recognition of a probable loss of $23.5 million related to litigation of our claims paying practices, and for the six months ended June 30, 2018, ~~and 2017~~ by an increase in our severity assumption on previously received delinquencies.

The “Losses paid” section of table ~~12.1~~11.1 below shows the amount of losses paid on delinquencies that occurred in the current year and losses paid on delinquencies that occurred in prior years. For several years, the average time it took to receive a claim associated with a delinquency had increased significantly from our historical experience of approximately twelve months. This was, in part, due to new loss mitigation protocols established by servicers and to changes in some state foreclosure laws that may include, for example, a requirement for additional review and/or mediation processes. In recent quarters, we have experienced a decline in the average time servicers are utilizing to process foreclosures, which has reduced the average time to receive a claim associated with new delinquent notices that do not cure. All else being equal, the longer the period between delinquency and claim filing, the greater the severity.

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2019 | 26

During the first six months of 2018, ~~and 2017,~~ our losses paid included ~~amounts~~$21 million paid upon commutation of coverage of pools of non-performing loans (“NPLs”) ~~and/or amounts paid in connection with disputes concerning~~. The commutations reduced our ~~claims paying practices. The impacts of the settlements were as follows:~~

~~2018 -~~ ~~662~~ ~~items were removed from the~~ delinquent inventory ~~with an amount paid of~~ ~~$21 million~~.

by 662 delinquencies and had no material impact on our losses incurred, net.

~~2017 -~~ ~~1,128~~ ~~items were removed from the delinquent inventory with amount paid of~~ ~~$45 million~~.

Premium refunds

Our estimate of premiums to be refunded on expected claim payments is accrued for separately in “Other Liabilities” on our consolidated balance sheets and approximated ~~$50~~$34 million and ~~$61~~$40 million at June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, respectively.

Table ~~12.1~~11.1 provides a reconciliation of beginning and ending loss reserves as of and for the six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017.~~2018.


	Table	12.1
Development of reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses			Six months ended June 30,						Development of reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses
	(In thousands)		2018			2017
	Reserve at beginning of period		$	985,635		$	1,438,813
	Less reinsurance recoverable		48,474			50,493
Table									11.1
	Net reserve at beginning of period		937,161			1,388,320				Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands)									(In thousands)	2019			2018
Reserve at beginning of period									Reserve at beginning of period	$	674,019		$	985,635
Less reinsurance recoverable									Less reinsurance recoverable	33,328			48,474
Net reserve at beginning of period									Net reserve at beginning of period	640,691			937,161

Losses incurred:									Losses incurred:
Losses and LAE incurred in respect of delinquency notices received in:									Losses and LAE incurred in respect of delinquency notices received in:
Current year									Current year	94,063			108,361
Prior years ⁽¹⁾									Prior years ⁽¹⁾	(33,164		)	(97,966		)
Total losses incurred									Total losses incurred	60,899			10,395
	Losses incurred:
	Losses and LAE incurred in respect of delinquency notices received in:
	Current year		108,361			158,906
	Prior years ⁽¹⁾		(97,966		)	(103,948		)
	Total losses incurred		10,395			54,958

	Losses paid:
	Losses and LAE paid in respect of delinquency notices received in:
	Current year		263			2,125
	Prior years		173,313			298,847
	Reinsurance terminations		(1,984		)	—
	Total losses paid		171,592			300,972
	Net reserve at end of period		775,964			1,142,306
	Plus reinsurance recoverables		37,051			44,783
	Reserve at end of period		$	813,015		$	1,187,089
Losses paid:									Losses paid:
Losses and LAE paid in respect of delinquency notices received in:									Losses and LAE paid in respect of delinquency notices received in:
Current year									Current year	2,650			263
Prior years									Prior years	109,420			173,313
Reinsurance terminations									Reinsurance terminations	(13,980		)	(1,984		)
Total losses paid									Total losses paid	98,090			171,592
Net reserve at end of period									Net reserve at end of period	603,500			775,964
Plus reinsurance recoverables									Plus reinsurance recoverables	18,402			37,051
Reserve at end of period									Reserve at end of period	$	621,902		$	813,015


⁽¹⁾	A negative number for prior year losses incurred indicates a redundancy of prior year loss reserves. See the following table for more information about prior year loss development.

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 29~~

~~Table of contents~~

The prior year development of the reserves in the first six months of ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018 is reflected in table ~~12.2~~11.2 below.


	Table	12.2
Reserve development on previously received delinquencies			Six months ended June 30,						Reserve development on previously received delinquencies
	(in millions)		2018			2017
	Decrease in estimated claim rate on primary defaults		$	(120	)	$	(104	)
	Increase in estimated severity on primary defaults		19			2
Table									11.2
	Change in estimates related to pool reserves, LAE reserves and reinsurance		3			(2		)		Six Months Ended June 30,
	Total prior year loss development ⁽¹⁾		$	(98	)	$	(104	)
(In millions)									(In millions)	2019			2018
Decrease in estimated claim rate on primary defaults									Decrease in estimated claim rate on primary defaults	$	(67	)	$	(120	)
Increase in estimated severity on primary defaults									Increase in estimated severity on primary defaults	3			19
Change in estimates related to pool reserves, LAE reserves, reinsurance, and other									Change in estimates related to pool reserves, LAE reserves, reinsurance, and other	31			3
Total prior year loss development ⁽¹⁾									Total prior year loss development ⁽¹⁾	$	(33	)	$	(98	)


⁽¹⁾	A negative number for prior year loss development indicates a redundancy of prior year loss reserves.

Delinquent inventory

A rollforward of our primary delinquent inventory for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018 appears in table ~~12.3~~11.3 below. The information concerning new notices and cures is compiled from monthly reports received from loan servicers. The level of new notice and cure activity reported in a particular month can be influenced by, among other things, the date on which a servicer generates its report, the accuracy of the data provided by servicers, the number of business days in a month, transfers of servicing between loan servicers and whether all servicers have provided the reports in a given month.

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2019 | 27

Table 12.3
Delinquent inventory rollforward Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
2018 2017 2018 2017
Delinquent inventory at beginning of period 41,243
45,349
46,556
50,282
New notices 12,159
14,463
26,782
29,402
Cures (15,350 ) (14,708 ) (33,423 ) (31,836 )
Paids (including those charged to a deductible or captive) (1,501 ) (2,573 ) (3,072 ) (5,208 )
Rescissions and denials (76 ) (100 ) (144 ) (195 )
Other items removed from inventory (438 ) (1,114 ) (662 ) (1,128 )
Delinquent inventory at end of period 36,037
41,317
36,037
41,317



Delinquent inventory rollforward
Table	11.3
		Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
		2019		2018		2019		2018
Delinquent inventory at beginning of period		30,921		41,243		32,898		46,556
New notices		12,915		12,159		26,526		26,782
Cures		(12,882	)	(15,350	)	(27,230	)	(33,423	)
Paid claims		(1,112	)	(1,501	)	(2,300	)	(3,072	)
Rescissions and denials		(47	)	(76	)	(99	)	(144	)
Other items removed from inventory		—		(438	)	—		(662	)
Delinquent inventory at end of period		29,795		36,037		29,795		36,037

The decrease in the primary delinquent inventory experienced during ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018 was generally across all markets and primarily in book years 2008 and prior. Historically as a ~~default~~delinquency ages it becomes more likely to result in a claim.

Hurricane activity

New delinquent notice activity increased in the fourth quarter of 2017 because of hurricane activity that primarily impacted Puerto Rico, Texas, and Florida in the third quarter of 2017. In response to the hurricanes, the Federal Emergency Management Agency has declared Individual Assistance Disaster Areas (“IADA”), and during the fourth quarter of 2017 we received 9,294 new notices from the IADA. As a result, the number of loans delinquent three months or less was a higher percentage of our total inventory as of December 31, 2017 than it had been as of June 30, 2017. A majorityMany of the loans infrom the ~~IADA first reported as delinquent in the fourth quarter of 2017~~hurricane impacted areas remained delinquent through the period ending June 30, 2018 and are shown asin the 4-11 months delinquent category in table ~~12.4~~ ~~below. Correspondingly,~~11.4. The majority of the ~~number of loans in our~~ delinquent ~~inventory shown as 4-11 months delinquent was elevated~~notices received from the hurricane activity cured as of ~~June 30, 2018, compared to~~ December 31, ~~2017 and June 30, 2017.~~2018.

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 30~~

Table ~~of contents~~

~~Table~~ ~~12.4~~11.4 below shows the number of consecutive months a borrower is delinquent.


Primary delinquent inventory - consecutive months delinquent												Primary delinquent inventory - consecutive months delinquent
Table												11.4
	Table	12.4											June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018		June 30, 2018
Delinquent inventory - consecutive months in default			June 30, 2018			December 31, 2017			June 30, 2017
	3 months or less		8,554	24	%	17,119	37	%	10,299	25	%
	4-11 months		12,506	35	%	12,050	26	%	11,018	27	%
	12 months or more ^{(1) (2)}		14,977	41	%	17,387	37	%	20,000	48	%
	Total primary delinquent inventory		36,037	100	%	46,556	100	%	41,317	100	%

	Primary claims received inventory included in ending delinquent inventory:		827	2	%	954	2	%	1,258	3	%
3 months or less												3 months or less	8,970		9,829		8,554
4-11 months												4-11 months	8,951		9,655		12,506
12 months or more ⁽¹⁾												12 months or more ⁽¹⁾	11,874		13,414		14,977
Total												Total	29,795		32,898		36,037
3 months or less												3 months or less	30	%	30	%	24	%
4-11 months												4-11 months	30	%	29	%	35	%
12 months or more												12 months or more	40	%	41	%	41	%
Total												Total	100	%	100	%	100	%
Primary claims received inventory included in ending delinquent inventory												Primary claims received inventory included in ending delinquent inventory	630		809		827


⁽¹⁾	Approximately ~~43%~~37%, ~~45%~~38%, and ~~46%~~43% of the primary delinquent inventory delinquent for 12 consecutive months or more has been delinquent for at least 36 consecutive months as of June 30, 2019, December 31, 2018, and June 30, 2018, ~~December 31, 2017, and~~ ~~June 30, 2017~~, respectively.


⁽²⁾	~~The majority of items removed from our delinquent inventory due to commutations of NPLs during the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2018~~ ~~were delinquent for 12 consecutive months or more as of December 31, 2017.~~

The number of months a loan is in the delinquent inventory can differ from the number of payments that the borrower has not made or is considered delinquent. These differences typically result from a borrower making monthly payments that do not result in the loan becoming fully current. Table ~~12.5~~ ~~below shows the number of payments that a borrower is delinquent.~~

Table 12.5
Delinquent inventory - number of payments delinquent June 30, 2018 December 31, 2017 June 30, 2017
3 payments or less 14,178
39 % 21,678
46 % 15,858
38 %
4-11 payments 11,429
32 % 12,446
27 % 10,560
26 %
12 payments or more ^{(1) (2)}
10,430
29 % 12,432
27 % 14,899
36 %
Total primary delinquent inventory 36,037
100 % 46,556
100 % 41,317
100 %


⁽¹⁾	~~Approximately~~ ~~41%~~, ~~43%, and~~ ~~44%~~ ~~of the primary delinquent inventory with 12 payments or more delinquent has at least 36 payments delinquent as of~~ ~~June 30, 2018~~, ~~December 31, 2017, and~~ ~~June 30, 2017, respectively.~~


⁽²⁾	~~The majority of items removed from our delinquent inventory due to commutations of NPLs during the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2018~~ ~~had 12 or more payments delinquent as of December 31, 2017.~~

~~Pool insurance delinquent inventory decreased to 1,067 at June 30, 2018 from 1,309 at December 31, 2017, and 1,511 at June 30, 2017.~~

Claims paying practices

Our loss reserving methodology incorporates our estimates of future rescissions and curtailments. A variance between ultimate actual rescission and curtailment rates and our estimates, as a result of the outcome of litigation, settlements or other factors, could materially affect our losses. Our estimate of premiums to be refunded on expected future rescissions is accrued for separately and is included in “Other liabilities” on our consolidated balance sheets. For information about discussions and legal proceedings with customers with respect to our claims paying practices see Note 5 – “Litigation and Contingencies.”

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 31~~

~~Table of contents~~

Note ~~13.~~12. Shareholders’ Equity

Share repurchase ~~program~~programs

~~On April 26, 2018,~~In March 2019, our ~~Board~~board of ~~Directors~~directors authorized aan additional share repurchase program under which we may repurchase up to $200 million of our common stock through the end of ~~2019.~~2020. During the second quarter of 2019 we repurchased approximately 1.8 million shares of our common stock at a weighted average cost per share of $13.79, which included commissions. These repurchases used the remaining $25 million of share repurchase authorization on the program announced in April 2018. Repurchases may be made from time to time on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. The repurchase program may be suspended for periods or discontinued at any time.

~~During the second quarter, we repurchased approximately 9.2 million shares of our common stock at a weighted average price per share of $10.88, which included commissions.~~

~~Change in accounting principle~~

~~As described in~~ ~~Note 2 - “New Accounting Pronouncements,”~~ ~~during the first quarter of 2018 the updated guidance of~~ ~~“Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”~~ became effective. The application of this guidance resulted in an immaterial cumulative effect adjustment to our 2018 beginning accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income and retained earnings to recognize unrealized gains on equity securities.

~~Shareholders Rights Agreement~~

Our Amended and Restated Rights Agreement dated August 1, 2018 (“the 2018 Agreement”) seeks to diminish the risk that our ability to use our NOLs to reduce potential future federal income tax obligations may become substantially limited and to deter certain abusive takeover practices. The benefit of the NOLs would be substantially limited, and the timing of the usage of the NOLs could be substantially delayed, if we were to experience an “ownership change” as defined by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Under the 2018 Agreement, each outstanding share of our Common Stock is accompanied by one Right. The “Distribution Date” occurs on the earlier of ten days after a public announcement that a person has become an “Acquiring Person,” or ten business days after a person announces or begins a tender offer in which consummation of such offer would result in a person becoming an “Acquiring Person.” An “Acquiring Person” is any person that becomes, by itself or together with its affiliates and associates, a beneficial owner of 5% or more of the shares of our Common Stock then outstanding, but excludes, among others, certain exempt and grandfathered persons as defined in the Agreement. The Rights are not exercisable until the Distribution Date. Each Right will initially entitle shareholders to buy one-tenth of one share of our Common Stock at a Purchase Price of $45 per full share (equivalent to $4.50 for each one-tenth share), subject to adjustment. Each exercisable Right (subject to certain limitations) will entitle its holder to purchase, at the Rights’ then-current Purchase Price, a number of our shares of Common Stock (or if after the Shares Acquisition Date, we are acquired in a business combination, common shares of the acquiror) having a market value at the time equal to twice the Purchase Price. The Rights will expire on March 1, 2020, or earlier as described in the 2018 Agreement. The Rights are redeemable at a price of $0.001 per Right at any time prior to the time a person becomes an Acquiring Person. Other than certain amendments, the Board of Directors may amend the Rights in any respect without the consent of the holders of the Rights.

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 32~~

~~Table of contents~~

Note ~~14.~~13. Share-Based Compensation

We have certain share-based compensation plans. Under the fair value method, compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized over the service period which generally corresponds to the vesting period. Awards under our plans generally vest over periods ranging from one to three years.

Table ~~14.1~~13.1 shows the number of shares granted to employees and the weighted average fair value per share during the periods presented (shares in thousands).



Restricted stock grants
Table	13.1
		Six months ended June 30,
		2019			2018
		Shares Granted	Weighted Average Share Fair Value		Shares Granted	Weighted Average Share Fair Value
RSUs subject to performance conditions		1,378	$	11.76	1,239	$	15.80
RSUs subject only to service conditions		412	11.76		412	15.71

Table 14.1
Restricted stock grants Six months ended June 30,
2018 2017

Shares
Granted
Weighted Average Share Fair Value
Shares
Granted
Weighted Average Share Fair Value
RSUs subject to performance conditions 1,239
$ 15.80
1,237
$ 10.41
RSUs subject only to service conditions 412
15.71
395
10.41

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2019 | 28

Note ~~15.~~14. Statutory Information

Statutory Capital Requirements

The insurance laws of 16 jurisdictions, including Wisconsin, our domiciliary state, require a mortgage insurer to maintain a minimum amount of statutory capital relative to the net risk in force (or a similar measure) in order for the mortgage insurer to continue to write new business. We refer to these requirements as the “State Capital Requirements.” While they vary among jurisdictions, the most common State Capital Requirements allow for a maximum risk-to-capital ratio of 25 to 1. A risk-to-capital ratio will increase if (i) the percentage decrease in capital exceeds the percentage decrease in insured risk, or (ii) the percentage increase in capital is less than the percentage increase in insured risk. Wisconsin does not regulate capital by using a risk-to-capital measure but instead requires a minimum policyholder position (“MPP”). The “policyholder position” of a mortgage insurer is its net worth or surplus, contingency reserve and a portion of the reserves for unearned premiums.

At June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, MGIC’s risk-to-capital ratio was ~~9.1~~10.1 to 1, below the maximum allowed by the jurisdictions with State Capital Requirements, and its policyholder position was ~~$2.4~~$2.7 billion above the required MPP of ~~$1.2~~$1.6 billion. In calculating our risk-to-capital ratio and MPP, we ~~are allowed~~have taken full credit for the risk ceded under our ~~reinsurance transactions~~QSR Transactions and Home Re Transactions with a group of unaffiliated reinsurers. It is possible that under the revised State Capital Requirements discussed below, MGIC will not be allowed full credit for the risk ceded to the reinsurers. If MGIC is not allowed an agreed level of credit under either the State Capital Requirements or the financial requirements of the PMIERs, MGIC may terminate the reinsurance transactions, without penalty. At this time, we expect MGIC to continue to comply with the current State Capital Requirements; however, ~~you should read the rest of these financial statement footnotes for information about~~ matters that could negatively affect such ~~compliance.~~compliance are discussed in the rest of these consolidated financial statement footnotes.

At June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the risk-to-capital ratio of our combined insurance operations ~~(which includes a reinsurance affiliate)~~ was 10.0 to 1. Reinsurance agreements with an affiliate permit MGIC to write insurance with a higher coverage percentage than it could on its own under certain state-specific requirements. A higher risk-to-capital ratio on a combined basis may indicate that, in order for MGIC to continue to utilize reinsurance agreements with its affiliate, additional capital contributions to the reinsurance affiliate could be needed.

The NAIC plans to revise the minimum capital and surplus requirements for mortgage insurers that are provided for in its Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Model Act. In May 2016, a working group of state regulators released an exposure draft of a risk-based capital framework to establish capital requirements for mortgage insurers, although no date has been established by which the NAIC must propose revisions to the capital requirements and certain items have not yet been completely addressed by the framework, including the treatment of ceded risk, minimum capital floors, and action level triggers. Currently, we believe that the PMIERs contain ~~the~~ more restrictive capital requirements than the draft Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Model Act in most circumstances.

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 33~~

~~Table of contents~~

While MGIC currently meets the State Capital Requirements of Wisconsin and all other jurisdictions, it could be prevented from writing new business in the future in all jurisdictions if it fails to meet the State Capital Requirements of Wisconsin, or it could be prevented from writing new business in a particular jurisdiction if it fails to meet the State Capital Requirements of that jurisdiction, and in each case MGIC does not obtain a waiver of such requirements. It is possible that regulatory action by one

or more jurisdictions, including those that do not have specific State Capital Requirements, may prevent MGIC from continuing to write new insurance in such jurisdictions.

If we are unable to write business in ~~all jurisdictions,~~a particular jurisdiction, lenders may be unwilling to procure insurance from us anywhere. In addition, a lender’s assessment of the future ability of our insurance operations to meet the State Capital Requirements or the PMIERs may affect its willingness to procure insurance from us. A possible future failure by MGIC to meet the State Capital Requirements or the PMIERs will not necessarily mean that MGIC lacks sufficient resources to pay claims on its insurance liabilities. While we believe MGIC has sufficient claims paying resources to meet its claim obligations on its insurance in force on a timely basis, ~~you should read the rest of these financial statement footnotes for information about~~ matters that could negatively affect MGIC’s claims paying ~~resources.~~resources are discussed in the rest of these consolidated financial statement footnotes.

Tax and Loss Bonds

As a mortgage guaranty insurer, we are eligible for a tax deduction, subject to certain limitations, under Section 832(e) of the IRC for amounts required by state law or regulation to be set aside in statutory contingency reserves. The deduction is allowed only to the extent that we purchase tax and loss bonds (“T&L Bonds”) in an amount equal to the tax benefit derived from deducting any portion of our statutory contingency reserves. During the three months ended June 30, 2019, we had net purchases of T&L Bonds in the amount of $74 million. Under statutory accounting practices, purchases of T&L Bonds are accounted for as investments. Under GAAP, purchases of T&L Bonds are accounted for as a payment of current taxes.

Dividend restrictions

In each of the first and second ~~quarter~~quarters of ~~2018,~~2019, MGIC paid a ~~$50~~$70 million dividend to our holding company. MGIC is subject to statutory regulations as to payment of dividends. The maximum amount of dividends that MGIC may pay in any twelve-month period without such dividends being subject to regulatory disapproval by the OCI is the lesser of adjusted statutory net income or 10% of statutory policyholders’ surplus as of the preceding calendar year end. Adjusted statutory net income is defined for this purpose to be the greater of statutory net income, net of realized investment gains, for the calendar year preceding the date of the dividend or statutory net income, net of realized investment gains, for the three calendar years preceding the date of the dividend less dividends paid within the first two of the preceding three calendar years. The OCI recognizes only statutory accounting principles prescribed, or practices permitted by the State of Wisconsin for determining and reporting the financial condition and results of operations of an insurance company. The OCI has adopted certain prescribed accounting practices that differ from those found in other states. Specifically, Wisconsin domiciled companies record changes in ~~the~~their contingency reserves through ~~the~~their income statement as a change in underwriting deduction. As a result, in periods in which MGIC is increasing contingency reserves, statutory net income is lowered. ~~For the year ended December 31, 2017, MGIC’s statutory net income was reduced by $473 million to account for the increase in contingency reserves.~~

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 ~~2018~~2019 | 3429

~~Table of contents~~

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Introduction

The following is management’s discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations of MGIC Investment Corporation for the second quarter ~~and first six months~~ of ~~2018.~~2019. As used below, “we” and “our” refer to MGIC Investment Corporation’s consolidated operations. This form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2017.~~2018. See the “Glossary of terms and acronyms” for definitions and descriptions of terms used throughout this MD&A. The Risk Factors referred to under “Forward Looking Statements and Risk Factors” below, discuss trends and uncertainties affecting us and are an integral part of the MD&A.

Forward Looking and Other Statements

As discussed under “Forward Looking Statements and Risk Factors” below, actual results may differ materially from the results contemplated by forward looking statements. We are not undertaking any obligation to update any forward looking statements or other statements we may make in the following discussion or elsewhere in this document even though these statements may be affected by events or circumstances occurring after the forward looking statements or other statements were made. Therefore no reader of this document should rely on these statements being current as of any time other than the time at which this document was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

~~Through our subsidiary MGIC, we are a leading provider of PMI in the United States, as measured by $200.7 billion of primary IIF at June 30, 2018.~~

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 ~~2018~~2019 | 3530

~~Table of contents~~

Overview



Summary financial results of MGIC Investment Corporation		Three Months Ended June 30,							Six Months Ended June 30, 2018						Summary financial results of MGIC Investment Corporation
	(In millions, except per share data, unaudited)	2018			2017		% Change		2018		2017		% Change
	Selected statement of operations data
	Total revenues	$	282.0		$	263.3	7		$	547.8	$	524.2	4
	Losses incurred, net	(13.5		)	27.3		(149	)	10.4		55.0		(81	)
	Other underwriting and operating expenses, net	41.8			38.5		9		87.9		79.3		11			Three Months Ended June 30,							Six Months Ended June 30,
(In millions, except per share data, unaudited)															(In millions, except per share data, unaudited)	2019		2018			% Change		2019		2018		% Change
Selected statement of operations data															Selected statement of operations data
Total revenues															Total revenues	$	292.3	$	282.0		4		$	584.0	$	547.8	7
Losses incurred, net															Losses incurred, net	21.8		(13.5		)	261		60.9		10.4		486
Other underwriting and operating expenses, net															Other underwriting and operating expenses, net	43.0		41.8			3		88.9		87.9		1
Income before tax															Income before tax	211.2		237.5			(11	)	402.1		417.5		(4	)
Provision for income taxes															Provision for income taxes	43.4		50.7			(14	)	82.4		87.1		(5	)
Net income															Net income	167.8		186.8			(10	)	319.7		330.5		(3	)
Diluted income per share															Diluted income per share	$	0.46	$	0.49		(6	)	$	0.87	$	0.87	—
	Income before tax	237.5			180.6		32		417.5		354.6		18
	Provision for income taxes	50.7			62.0		(18	)	87.1		146.2		(40	)
	Net income	186.8			118.6		57		330.5		208.4		59
	Diluted income per share	$	0.49		$	0.31	58		$	0.87	$	0.55	58

	Non-GAAP Financial Measures ⁽¹⁾
	Adjusted pre-tax operating income	$	239.4		$	180.7	32		$	419.8	$	354.8	18
	Adjusted net operating income	189.2			119.3		59		333.8		236.4		41
	Adjusted net operating income per diluted share	$	0.50		$	0.31	60		$	0.88	$	0.62	42
Non-GAAP Financial Measures ⁽¹⁾															Non-GAAP Financial Measures ⁽¹⁾
Adjusted pre-tax operating income															Adjusted pre-tax operating income	$	211.0	$	239.4		(12	)	$	402.6	$	419.8	(4	)
Adjusted net operating income															Adjusted net operating income	167.6		189.2			(11	)	320.0		333.8		(4	)
Adjusted net operating income per diluted share															Adjusted net operating income per diluted share	$	0.46	$	0.50		(8	)	$	0.87	$	0.88	(1	)

⁽¹⁾ See “Explanation and reconciliation of our use of Non-GAAP financial measures.”

Summary of second quarter ~~and year to date 2018~~2019 results

Comparative quarterly results

We recorded second quarter ~~2018~~2019 net income of ~~$186.8~~$167.8 million, or ~~$0.49~~$0.46 per diluted share. Net income ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$68.2~~$19.0 million ~~compared with~~(10%) from net income of ~~$118.6~~$186.8 million in the prior year, primarily reflecting ~~decreases~~an increase in ~~our~~ losses incurred, net, partially offset by an increase in investment income and a decrease in our provision for income taxes. ~~The decline~~Diluted income per share declined 6 percent reflecting the decrease in ~~our losses incurred,~~ net ~~also had the effect of reducing our ceded premiums due to an increase~~income, offset in ~~our reinsurance profit commission. In addition,~~part by a decrease in our diluted weighted average shares ~~outstanding decreased from the prior year. These factors resulted in a 58% increase in diluted income per share.~~outstanding.

Adjusted net operating income for the second quarter ~~2018~~2019 was ~~$189.2~~$167.6 million (Q2 ~~2017: $119.3~~2018: $189.2 million) and adjusted net operating income per diluted share was ~~$0.50~~$0.46 (Q2 ~~2017: $0.31)~~2018: $0.50). The 59% increase in adjusted net operating income primarily reflects the increase in net income. The increase in adjusted net operating income and decrease in diluted weighted average shares outstanding resulted in a 60% increase in adjustedAdjusted net operating income per diluted ~~share.~~share declined 8% reflecting the decrease in net income, offset in part by a decrease in our diluted weighted average shares outstanding.

Losses incurred, netfor the second quarter of ~~2018~~2019 were ~~$(13.5)~~$21.8 million, ~~a $40.8~~an increase of $35.3 million ~~improvement~~ compared to the prior ~~year, primarily~~year. The increase was due to ~~16% fewer new delinquent notices~~a lower level of favorable loss reserve development on previously received delinquencies compared to the prior year. The increase was offset in ~~the~~part by lower current year ~~period and a decline in~~losses incurred as the ~~estimated claim rate on those notices, to 9.5% from 11% in the prior year period. Our~~ estimated claim rate on new notices ~~reflects the current economic environment and anticipated cure activity on the notices received. In addition, favorable development on previously received delinquencies was higher~~ in the ~~current year period.~~

~~Other underwriting and operating expenses, net were $41.8 million, an increase~~second quarter of 9%2019 was 8%, compared to 9.5% in the prior ~~year primarily driven by higher share-based compensation expenses, which resulted from a higher stock price at the grant date, and non-executive compensation.~~year.

The decrease in our provision for income taxes in the second quarter of ~~2018~~2019 as compared to the ~~same period in the~~ prior year was primarily due to ~~the~~a decrease ~~in the statutory income tax rate, offset in part by an increase~~ in income before tax.

In June ~~2018,~~2019, MGIC paid a dividend of ~~$50~~$70 million to our holding company and we expect MGIC to continue to pay quarterly dividends of at least that ~~amount.~~amount, subject to approval by MGIC’s board of directors and non-disapproval by the OCI.

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 36~~

~~Table of contents~~

Comparative year to date results

We recorded net income of ~~$330.5~~$319.7 million, or $0.87 per diluted share during the first six months of ~~2018.~~2019. Net income ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$122.0~~$10.7 million ~~compared with~~from net income of ~~$208.4~~$330.5 million in the prior year, primarily reflecting ~~decreases~~an increase in ~~our~~ losses incurred, net, ~~and our provision for income taxes. The decline in our losses incurred, net also had the effect of reducing our ceded premiums due to~~partially offset by an increase in ~~our reinsurance profit commission. In addition,~~premiums and investment income. Diluted income per share was the same as the prior year as the decrease in net income was offset by a decrease in our diluted weighted average shares ~~outstanding decreased from the prior year. These factors resulted in a 58% increase in diluted income per share.~~outstanding.

Adjusted net operating income for the first six months of ~~2018~~2019 was ~~$333.8~~$320.0 million (YTD ~~2017: $236.4~~2018: $333.8 million) and adjusted net operating income per diluted share was ~~$0.88~~$0.87 (YTD ~~2017: $0.62)~~2018: $0.88). The 41% increase in adjusted net operating income primarily reflects the increase in net income in the current year period. The increase in adjusted net operating income and decrease in diluted weighted average shares outstanding resulted in a 42% increase in adjustedAdjusted net operating income per diluted ~~share.~~share was roughly the same as the prior year as the decrease in net income was offset by a decrease in our diluted weighted average shares outstanding.

Losses incurred, netfor the first six months of ~~2018~~2019 were ~~$10.4~~$60.9 million, ~~down 81.1% compared to~~an increase of $50.5 million over the prior ~~year~~year. The increase was due to ~~9% fewer new delinquent notices~~a lower level of favorable loss reserve development on previously received delinquencies and the recognition of a probable loss of $23.5 million for litigation of our claims paying practices during the first quarter of 2019. The increase was offset in ~~the~~part by lower current year ~~period and a decrease in~~losses incurred as the ~~estimated claim rate of on those notices, to 9% from 11% in the prior year period. Our~~ estimated claim rate on new notices ~~reflects~~in the ~~current economic environment and anticipated cure activity on the notices received.~~

~~Other underwriting and operating expenses, net were $87.9 million, an increase~~first six months of ~~11%~~2019 was 8%, compared to 9% in the prior ~~year primarily driven by higher share-based compensation expenses, which resulted from a higher stock price at the grant date, and non-executive compensation.~~year.

The decrease in our provision for income taxes in the first six months of ~~2018~~2019 as compared to the ~~same period in the~~ prior year was primarily due ~~in part~~ to ~~the~~a decrease ~~in the statutory income tax rate, offset in part by an increase~~ in income before tax. ~~In addition, the provision for income tax in the prior year period included an additional provision of $27.8 million for the expected settlement of our IRS litigation.~~

See “Consolidated Results of Operations”below for additional discussion of our results for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 compared to the respective prior year periods.

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2019 | 31

Capital

Share repurchase ~~program~~programs

On ~~April 26, 2018,~~March 19, 2019, our board of directors authorized aan additional share repurchase program under which we may repurchase up to $200 million of our common stock through the end of ~~2019.~~2020. During the second quarter of 2019, we repurchased approximately 1.8 million shares of common stock for $25 million, which used the remaining authorization on the program announced in April 2018. Repurchases may be made from time to time on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. The repurchase ~~program~~programs may be suspended for periods or discontinued at any time. ~~During the second quarter of 2018, we utilized approximately $100.1 million of cash at our holding company to repurchase approximately 9.2 million shares of our common stock.~~ As of June 30, ~~2018, our holding company had approximately $191 million in cash and investments and we expect to fund any additional purchases with these resources. As of June 30, 2018,~~2019, we had approximately ~~362.1~~354 million shares of common stock outstanding.

Since the end of the second quarter of 2019, through August 5, 2019, we repurchased approximately 1.8 million shares of our common stock for approximately $23 million.

Dividends to shareholders

On July 25, 2019, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend to shareholders of the company of $0.06 per share payable on September 20, 2019, to shareholders of record at the close of business on August 30, 2019.

GSEs

We must comply with the PMIERs to be eligible to insure loans delivered to or purchased by the ~~GSEs and insured with PMI.~~GSEs. In addition to their financial requirements, the PMIERs include business, quality control and certain transaction approval requirements. Refer to “Liquidity and Capital Resources - Capital Adequacy - PMIERs” of this MD&A for additional information regarding our capital adequacy under PMIERs.

If MGIC ceases to be eligible to insure loans purchased by one or both of the GSEs, it would significantly reduce the volume of our ~~NIW.~~new business writings. Factors that may negatively impact MGIC’s ability to continue to comply with the financial requirements of the PMIERs include the following:

In December 2017, we received from the GSEs a summary of proposed changes to the PMIERs. In June 2018, we received a revised draft of proposed changes to the PMIERs that we expect will be finalized in the third quarter of 2018 and become effective at the end of the first quarter of 2019 (the revised PMIERs

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 37~~

~~Table of contents~~



è	The GSEs may amend the PMIERs at any time and may make the PMIERs more onerous in the future. The GSEs have indicated that there may be potential future implications for PMIERs based upon feedback the FHFA receives on its June 2018 proposed rule on regulatory capital requirements for the GSEs, which included a framework for determining the capital relief allowed to the GSEs for loans with private mortgage insurance (public comments were due by November 16, 2018). Further, any changes to the GSEs' capital and liquidity requirements resulting from the Treasury Housing Reform Plan (discussed below) could have future implications for PMIERs. In addition, the PMIERs provide that the factors that determine Minimum Required Assets will be updated every two years and may be updated more frequently to reflect changes in macroeconomic conditions or loan performance. The GSEs have indicated that they will generally provide notice 180 days prior to the effective date of such updates.
è	Our future operating results may be negatively impacted by the matters discussed in our risk factors. Such matters could decrease our revenues, increase our losses or require the use of assets, thereby creating a shortfall in Available Assets.
è	Should capital be needed by MGIC in the future, capital contributions from our holding company may not be available due to competing demands on holding company resources, including for repayment of debt.

are referred to as "PMIERs 2.0"). Upon effectiveness of PMIERs 2.0, we expect that MGIC would continue to have a significant excess of Available Assets over Minimum Required Assets ("PMIERs Excess"), although our PMIERs Excess would be materially lower than it was at June 30, 2018 under the existing PMIERs, and that MGIC would continue to be able to pay quarterly dividends to our holding company of at least the $50 million quarterly rate at which they were paid in the first and second quarters of 2018.

We have non-disclosure obligations to each of the GSEs and cannot provide further comment on the draft of PMIERs 2.0, other than as described above. Until the GSEs and/or FHFA provide public disclosure of the final version of PMIERs 2.0, we do not plan to update or correct any of the disclosures above.

Our future operating results may be negatively impacted by the matters discussed in our risk factors. Such matters could decrease our revenues, increase our losses or require the use of assets, thereby creating a shortfall in Available Assets.

Should capital be needed by MGIC in the future, capital contributions from our holding company may not be available due to competing demands on holding company resources, including for repayment of debt.

While on an overall basis, the amount of Available Assets MGIC must hold in order to continue to insure GSE loans ~~increased~~is greater under the PMIERs ~~over~~than what state regulation currently requires, our reinsurance transactions mitigate the negative effect of the PMIERs on our returns. However, reinsurance may not always be available to us or available on similar terms, it subjects us to counterparty credit risk and the GSEs may change the credit they allow under the PMIERs for risk ceded under our reinsurance transactions.

State Regulations

The insurance laws of 16 jurisdictions, including Wisconsin, ~~our~~MGIC’s domiciliary state, require a mortgage insurer to maintain a minimum amount of statutory capital relative to its net RIF (or a similar measure) in order for the mortgage insurer to continue to write new business. We refer to these requirements as the “State Capital Requirements.” While they vary among jurisdictions, the most common State Capital Requirements allow for a maximum risk-to-capital ratio of 25 to 1. A risk-to-capital ratio will increase if (i) the percentage decrease in capital exceeds the percentage decrease in insured risk, or (ii) the percentage increase in capital is less than the percentage increase in insured risk. Wisconsin does not regulate capital by using a risk-to-capital measure but instead requires an MPP.

At June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, MGIC’s risk-to-capital ratio was ~~9.1~~10.1 to 1, below the maximum allowed by the jurisdictions with State Capital Requirements, and its policyholder position was ~~$2.4~~$2.7 billion above the required MPP of ~~$1.2~~$1.6 billion. In calculating our risk-to-capital ratio and MPP, we ~~are allowed~~have taken full credit for the risk ceded under our ~~reinsurance transactions with a group of unaffiliated reinsurers.~~QSR Transactions and Home Re Transactions. It is possible that under the revised State Capital Requirements discussed below, MGIC will not be allowed full credit for the risk ceded to the reinsurers. If MGIC is not allowed an agreed level of credit under either the State Capital Requirements or the PMIERs, MGIC may terminate the reinsurance transactions, without penalty. At this time, we expect MGIC to continue to comply with the current State Capital Requirements; however, refer to our risk factor titled “State capital requirements may prevent us from continuing to write new insurance on an uninterrupted basis” for more information about matters that could negatively affect such compliance.

At June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the risk-to-capital ratio of our combined insurance operations ~~(which includes a reinsurance affiliate)~~ was ~~10.0~~10 to 1. ~~Reinsurance transactions with our affiliate permit MGIC to write insurance with a higher coverage percentage than it could on its own under certain state-specific requirements.~~

The NAIC plans to revise the minimum capital and surplus requirements for mortgage insurers that are provided for in its Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Model Act. AIn May 2016, a working group of state regulators ~~has been considering since 2016~~released an exposure draft of a risk-based capital framework to establish capital requirements for mortgage insurers, although no date has been established by which the NAIC must propose revisions to the capital requirements and certain items have not yet been completely addressed by the framework, including the treatment of ceded risk, minimum capital floors, and action level triggers. Currently we believe that the PMIERs contain ~~the~~ more restrictive capital requirements than the draft Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Model Act in most circumstances.

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 ~~2018~~2019 | 3832

~~Table of contents~~

GSE reform

The FHFA has been the conservator of the GSEs since 2008 and has the authority to control and direct their operations. The increased role that the federal government has assumed in the residential housing finance system through the GSE conservatorship may increase the likelihood that the business practices of the GSEs change in ways that have a material adverse effect on us and that the charters of the GSEs are changed by new federal legislation. In the past, members of Congress have introduced several bills intended to change the business practices of the GSEs and the FHA; however, no legislation has been enacted.

In March 2019, President Trump directed the U.S. Treasury Department to develop a plan, as soon as practicable, for administrative and legislative reforms for the housing finance system (“Treasury Housing Reform Plan”), with such reforms to reduce taxpayer risk, expand the private sector’s role, modernize the government housing programs, and achieve sustainable homeownership. The ~~Administration issued a June 2018 report indicating that~~directive outlines numerous goals and objectives, including but not limited to, the end of conservatorship of the GSEs, ~~should end~~increased competition and participation of the private sector in the mortgage market including by authorizing the FHFA to approve additional guarantors of conventional mortgages in the secondary market, appropriate capital and liquidity requirements for the GSEs, and evaluation of the GSE Patch. The GSE Patch expands the definition of Qualified Mortgage (“QM”) under the Truth in Lending Act (Regulation Z) to include mortgages eligible to be purchased by the GSEs, even if the mortgages do not meet the DTI ratio limit of 43% included in the standard QM definition.

The GSE Patch is scheduled to expire no later than January 2021. In July 2019, the CFPB released an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on the QM definition. The director of the CFPB indicated that the ~~GSEs~~CFPB would consider only a short-term extension of the GSE Patch. Approximately 30% and 24% of our NIW in the first and second quarters of 2019, respectively, was on loans with DTI ratios greater than 43%. However, it is possible that not all future loans with DTI ratios greater than 43% will be affected by a sunset of the GSE Patch, in part because the standard QM definition may be liberalized under the new rules. In this regard, we note that the CFPB asked for comment about whether the definition of QM should ~~transition~~retain a direct measure of a consumer’s personal finances (for example, DTI ratio); whether the definition should include an alternative method for assessing financial capacity; whether, if the QM definition retains a DTI ratio limit, the limit should remain 43% or be increased or decreased; and whether loans with DTI ratios above a prescribed limit should be given QM status if certain compensating factors are present. We may insure loans that do not qualify as QMs, however, we are unsure the extent to ~~fully private entities, competing on a level playing field with private issuers of MBS (such issuers, collectively~~which lenders will make non-QM loans because they will not be entitled to the presumptions about compliance with the ~~GSEs, referred~~“ability to inrepay” rules that the ~~report as~~law allows with respect to QM loans. We are also unsure the ~~"guarantors").~~ extent to which lenders will purchase private mortgage insurance for loans that cannot be sold to the GSEs.

The ~~report further indicated~~rule that ~~a federal entity should regulate~~includes the ~~guarantors, including their capital adequacy, and~~QM definition that ~~guarantors should have access~~applies to ~~an explicit federal guarantee on the MBS that is only exposed after substantial losses are incurred~~loans insured by the ~~private market, including the guarantors. The report also indicated that a fee on the outstanding volume of MBS would be transferred to~~FHA was issued by the Department of Housing and Urban Development ~~(of which~~(“HUD”) and that definition is less restrictive than the ~~FHA~~CFPB’s definition in certain respects, including that (i) it has no DTI ratio limit, and (ii) it allows the lender certain presumptions about compliance with the “ability to repay” requirements on higher priced loans. It is ~~a part)~~possible that lenders will prefer FHA-insured loans to ~~be used for affordable housing purposes. As~~loans insured by private mortgage insurance as a result of the ~~matters referred~~FHA’s less restrictive QM definition.

In March 2019, the President also directed the Secretary of HUD to ~~above, it is uncertain what role~~develop a plan that would recommend administrative and legislative reforms to the ~~GSEs,~~programs HUD oversees, including those of the FHA and ~~private capital, including PMI, will play in~~ the residential housing finance system in the future or the impact of any such changes on our business. In addition, the timing of the impact of any resulting changes on our business is uncertain. Most meaningful changes would require Congressional action to implement and it is difficult to estimate when Congressional action would be final and how long any associated phase-in period may last.Government National Mortgage Association.

For additional information about the business practices of the GSEs, see our risk factor titled “Changes in the business practices of the GSEs, federal legislation that changes their charters or a restructuring of the GSEs could reduce our revenues or increase our losses.”

~~Loan modifications and other similar programs~~

The federal government, including through the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the GSEs, and several lenders have modification and refinance programs to make outstanding loans more affordable to borrowers with the goal of reducing the number of foreclosures. These programs included HAMP, which expired at the end of 2016, and HARP, which is scheduled to expire at the end of 2018. The GSEs have introduced other loan modifications programs to replace HAMP.

From 2008 through 2012, we were notified of modifications that cured delinquencies that, had they become paid claims, would have resulted in a material increase in our incurred losses. More recently, the number of modifications has decreased significantly. Nearly all of the reported loan modifications were for loans insured in 2009 and prior.

We cannot determine the total benefit we may derive from loan modification programs, particularly given the uncertainty around the re-default rates for defaulted loans that have been modified. Our loss reserves do not account for potential re-defaults of current loans.

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 39~~

~~Table of contents~~

~~As shown in the following table, as of June 30, 2018 approximately 14% of our primary RIF has been modified.~~

Modifications Policy year
HARP Modifications ⁽¹⁾
HAMP & Other Modifications
2003 and prior 10.8 % 42.5 %
2004 18.7 % 45.8 %
2005 25.4 % 44.0 %
2006 28.9 % 41.4 %
2007 40.6 % 32.2 %
2008 56.2 % 19.5 %
2009 39.0 % 6.5 %
2010 - Q2 2018 — % 0.4 %

Total 7.1 % 7.0 %


⁽¹⁾	~~Includes proprietary programs that are substantially the same as HARP.~~

~~As of June 30, 2018, based on loan count, the loans associated with 97.4% of HARP modifications and 79.3% of HAMP and other modifications were current.~~

Factors affecting our results

Our results of operations are affected by:

Premiums written and earned

Premiums written and earned in a year are influenced by:

NIW, which increases IIF. Many factors affect NIW, including the volume of low down payment home mortgage originations and competition to provide credit enhancement on those mortgages from the FHA, the VA, other mortgage insurers, and other alternatives to mortgage ~~insurance; and in the future NIW may be affected by~~insurance, including GSE programs that may reduce or eliminate the demand for mortgage insurance. NIW does not include loans previously insured by us that are modified, such as loans modified under HARP.

Cancellations, which reduce IIF. Cancellations due to refinancings are affected by the level of current mortgage interest rates compared to the mortgage coupon rates throughout the in force book, current home values compared to values when the loans in the in force book were insured and the terms on which mortgage credit is available. Home price appreciation can give homeowners the right to cancel mortgage insurance on their loans if sufficient home equity is achieved. Cancellations also result from policy rescissions, which require us to return any premiums received on the rescinded policies and claim payments, which require us to return any premium received on the related policies from the date of default on the insured loans. Cancellations of single premium policies, which are generally non-refundable, result in immediate recognition of any remaining unearned premium.

Premium rates, which are affected by product type, competitive pressures, the risk characteristics of the insured loans, the percentage of coverage on the insured loans, and PMIERs capital requirements. The substantial majority of our monthly and annual mortgage insurance premiums are under premium plans for which, for the first ten years of the policy, the amount of premium is determined by multiplying the initial premium rate by the original loan

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2019 | 33

balance; thereafter, the premium rate resets to a lower rate used for the remaining life of the policy. However, for loans that have utilized HARP, the initial ten-year period resets as of the date of the HARP transaction. The remainder of our monthly and annual premiums are under premium plans for which premiums are determined by a fixed percentage of the loan’s amortizing balance over the life of the policy.


•	Premiums ceded, net of a profit commission, under ~~reinsurance agreements.~~our QSR Transactions, and premiums ceded under our Home Re Transactions. See Note 4 - “Reinsurance” to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our reinsurance ~~agreements.~~transactions.

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 40~~

~~Table of contents~~

Premiums are generated by the insurance that is in force during all or a portion of the period. A change in the average IIF in the current period compared to an earlier period is a factor that will increase (when the average in force is higher) or reduce (when it is lower) premiums written and earned in the current period, although this effect may be enhanced (or mitigated) by differences in the average premium rate between the two periods as well as by premiums that are returned or expected to be returned in connection with claim payments and rescissions, and premiums ceded under reinsurance agreements. Also, NIW and cancellations during a period will generally have a greater effect on premiums written and earned in subsequent periods than in the period in which these events occur.

Investment income

Our investment portfolio is composed principally of investment grade fixed income securities. The principal factors that influence investment income are the size of the portfolio and its yield. As measured by amortized cost (which excludes changes in fair value, such as from changes in interest rates), the size of the investment portfolio is mainly a function of cash generated from (or used in) operations, such as NPW, investment income, net claim payments and expenses, and cash provided by (or used for) non-operating activities, such as debt, or stock issuances or ~~repurchases.~~repurchases, or dividends.

Losses incurred

Losses incurred are the current expense that reflects estimated payments that will ultimately be made as a result of delinquencies on insured loans. As explained under “Critical Accounting Policies” in our 2018 10-K MD&A, except in the case of a premium deficiency reserve, we recognize an estimate of this expense only for delinquent loans. The level of new delinquencies has historically followed a seasonal pattern, with new delinquencies in the first part of the year lower than new delinquencies in the latter part of the year, though this pattern can be affected by the state of the economy and local housing markets. Losses incurred are generally affected by:

The state of the economy, including unemployment and housing values, each of which affects the likelihood that loans will become delinquent and whether loans that are delinquent cure their delinquency.

The product mix of the in force book, with loans having higher risk characteristics generally resulting in higher delinquencies and claims.

The size of loans insured, with higher average loan amounts tending to increase losses incurred.

The percentage of coverage on insured loans, with deeper average coverage tending to increase losses incurred.

The rate at which we rescind policies or curtail claims. Our estimated loss reserves incorporate our estimates of future rescissions of policies and curtailments of claims, and reversals of rescissions and curtailments. We collectively refer to ~~such~~ rescissions and denials as “rescissions” and variations of this term. We call reductions to claims “curtailments.”

The distribution of claims over the life of a book. Historically, the first few years after loans are originated are a period of relatively low claims, with claims increasing substantially for several years subsequent and then declining, although persistency, the condition of the economy, including unemployment and housing prices, and other factors can affect this pattern. For example, a weak economy or housing value declines can lead to claims from older books increasing, continuing at stable levels or experiencing a lower rate of decline. See further information under “Mortgage insurance earnings and cash flow cycle” below.


•	Losses ceded under reinsurance ~~agreements.~~transactions. See Note 4 - “Reinsurance” to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our reinsurance ~~agreements.~~transactions.

Underwriting and other expenses

~~Most of our operating expenses are fixed, with some variability due to contract underwriting volume. Contract underwriting generates fee income included in “Other revenue.”~~ Underwriting and other expenses includes items such as employee compensation, fees for professional services, depreciation and maintenance expense, and premium taxes, and are reported net of

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 41~~

~~Table of contents~~

~~any~~ ceding ~~commission~~commissions associated with our reinsurance ~~agreements.~~transactions. Employee compensation expenses are variable due to share-based compensation, changes in benefits, and headcount (which can fluctuate due to volume). See Note 4 - “Reinsurance” to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our reinsurance ~~agreements.~~transactions.

Interest expense

Interest expense primarily reflects the interest associated with our outstanding debt obligations discussed in Note 3 - “Debt” to our consolidated financial statements and under “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below.

Other

Certain activities that we do not consider part of our fundamental operating activities may also impact our results of operations and are described ~~below.~~in the following.

Net realized investment gains (losses)

Fixed income securities.Realized investment gains and losses are a function of the difference between the amount received on the sale of a fixed income security and the fixed income security’s cost basis, as well as any “other than temporary” impairments (“OTTI”) recognized in earnings. The amount received on the sale of fixed income securities is affected by the coupon rate of the security compared to the yield of comparable securities at the time of sale.

~~Loss on debt extinguishment~~

At times, we may undertake activities to enhance our capital position, improve our debt profile and/or reduce potential dilution from our outstanding convertible debt. Extinguishing our outstanding debt obligations early through these discretionary activities may result

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2019 | 34

Equity securities. Realized investment gains and losses are a function of the periodic change in ~~losses primarily driven by the payment of consideration~~fair value, as well as any OTTI recognized in ~~excess of our carrying value.~~earnings.

Refer to “Explanation and reconciliation of our use of Non-GAAP financial measures”belowto understand how these items impact our evaluation of our core financial performance.

Mortgage insurance earnings and cash flow cycle

In general, the majority of any underwriting profit that a book generates occurs in the early years of the book, with the largest portion of any underwriting profit realized in the first year following the year the book was written. Subsequent years of a book may result in either underwriting profit or underwriting losses. This pattern of results typically occurs because relatively few of the incurred losses on delinquencies that a book will ultimately experience typically occur in the first few years of the book, when premium revenue is highest, while subsequent years are affected by declining premium revenues, as the number of insured loans decreases (primarily due to loan prepayments) and increasing losses. The typical pattern is also a function of premium rates generally resetting to lower levels after ten years.

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 ~~2018~~2019 | 4235

~~Table of contents~~

Explanation and reconciliation of our use of non-GAAP financial measures

Non-GAAP financial measures

We believe that use of the Non-GAAP measures of adjusted pre-tax operating income (loss), adjusted net operating income (loss) and adjusted net operating income (loss) per diluted share facilitate the evaluation of the company's core financial performance thereby providing relevant information to investors. These measures are not recognized in accordance with GAAP and should not be viewed as alternatives to GAAP measures of performance.

Adjusted pre-tax operating income (loss)is defined as GAAP income (loss) before tax, excluding the effects of net realized investment gains (losses), gain (loss) on debt extinguishment, net impairment losses recognized in income (loss) and infrequent or unusual non-operating items where applicable.

Adjusted net operating income (loss)is defined as GAAP net income (loss) excluding the after-tax effects of net realized investment gains (losses), gain (loss) on debt extinguishment, net impairment losses recognized in income (loss), and infrequent or unusual non-operating items where applicable. The amounts of adjustments to components of pre-tax operating income (loss) are tax effected using a federal statutory tax rate of 21% ~~for 2018 and 35% for 2017.~~.

Adjusted net operating income (loss) per diluted shareis calculated in a manner consistent with the accounting standard regarding earnings per share by dividing (i) adjusted net operating income (loss) after making adjustments for interest expense on convertible debt, whenever the impact is dilutive by (ii) diluted weighted average common shares outstanding, which reflects share dilution from unvested restricted stock units and from convertible debt when dilutive under the “if-converted” method.

Although adjusted pre-tax operating income (loss) and adjusted net operating income (loss) exclude certain items that have occurred in the past and are expected to occur in the future, the excluded items represent items that are: (1) not viewed as part of the operating performance of our primary activities; or (2) impacted by both discretionary and other economic or regulatory factors and are not necessarily indicative of operating trends, or both. These adjustments, along with the reasons for their treatment, are described below. Trends in the profitability of our fundamental operating activities can be more clearly identified without the fluctuations of these adjustments. Other companies may calculate these measures differently. Therefore, their measures may not be comparable to those used by us.


(1)	Net realized investment gains (losses). The recognition of net realized investment gains or losses can vary significantly across periods as the timing of individual securities sales is highly discretionary and is influenced by such factors as market opportunities, our tax and capital profile, and overall market cycles.


(2)	Gains and losses on debt extinguishment. Gains and losses on debt extinguishment result from discretionary activities that are undertaken to enhance our capital position, improve our debt profile, and/or reduce potential dilution from our outstanding convertible debt.


(3)	Net impairment losses recognized in earnings. The recognition of net impairment losses on investments can vary significantly in both size and timing, depending on market credit cycles, individual issuer performance, and general economic conditions.


(4)	Infrequent or unusual non-operating items. Income tax expense related to our IRS dispute is related to past transactions which are non-recurring in nature and are not part of our primary operating activities.

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 ~~2018~~2019 | 4336

~~Table of contents~~

Non-GAAP reconciliations Reconciliation of Income before tax / Net income to Adjusted pre-tax operating income / Adjusted net operating income
Three Months Ended June 30,
2018 2017
(In thousands, except per share amounts) Pre-tax Tax provision (benefit) Net
(after-tax) Pre-tax Tax provision (benefit) Net
(after-tax)
Income before tax / Net income $ 237,522
$ 50,708
$ 186,814
$ 180,616
$ 61,994
$ 118,622
Adjustments:
Additional income tax provision related to IRS litigation —
(923 ) 923
—
(559 ) 559
Net realized investment losses 1,897
398
1,499
52
18
34
Loss on debt extinguishment —
—
—
65
23
42
Adjusted pre-tax operating income / Adjusted net operating income $ 239,419
$ 50,183
$ 189,236
$ 180,733
$ 61,476
$ 119,257

Reconciliation of Net income per diluted share to Adjusted net operating income per diluted share

Weighted average diluted shares outstanding 388,881
394,470

Net income per diluted share $ 0.49
$ 0.31
Additional income tax provision related to IRS litigation —
⁽¹⁾
—
Net realized investment losses —
⁽¹⁾
—
Loss on debt extinguishment —
—
Adjusted net operating income per diluted share $ 0.50
$ 0.31

⁽¹⁾ For the three months ended June 30, 2018, the individual adjustments are each less than $0.01 per diluted share, but collectively aggregate to $0.01 per diluted share.

Reconciliation of Income before tax / Net income to Adjusted pre-tax operating income / Adjusted net operating income
Six Months Ended June 30,
2018 2017
(In thousands, except per share amounts) Pre-tax Tax provision (benefit) Net
(after-tax) Pre-tax Tax provision (benefit) Net
(after-tax)
Income before tax / Net income $ 417,547
$ 87,096
$ 330,451
$ 354,573
$ 146,153
$ 208,420
Adjustments:
Additional income tax provision related to IRS litigation —
(1,631 ) 1,631
—
(27,783 ) 27,783
Net realized investment losses 2,226
467
1,759
177
62
115
Loss on debt extinguishment —
—
—
65
23
42
Adjusted pre-tax operating income / Adjusted net operating income $ 419,773
$ 85,932
$ 333,841
$ 354,815
$ 118,455
$ 236,360

Reconciliation of Net income per diluted share to Adjusted net operating income per diluted share

Weighted average diluted shares outstanding 390,236
398,302

Net income per diluted share $ 0.87
$ 0.55
Additional income tax provision related to IRS litigation —
⁽²⁾
0.07
Net realized investment losses —
⁽²⁾
—
Loss on debt extinguishment —
—
Adjusted net operating income per diluted share $ 0.88
$ 0.62

⁽²⁾ For the six months ended June 30, 2018, individual adjustments are each less than $0.01 per diluted share, but collectively aggregate to $0.01 per diluted share.



Non-GAAP reconciliations

Reconciliation of Income before tax / Net income to Adjusted pre-tax operating income / Adjusted net operating income
	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2019									2018
(In thousands, except per share amounts)	Pre-tax			Tax effect			Net (after-tax)			Pre-tax		Tax effect			Net (after-tax)
Income before tax / Net income	$	211,211		$	43,433		$	167,778		$	237,522	$	50,708		$	186,814
Adjustments:
Additional income tax benefit (provision) related to IRS litigation	—			—			—			—		(923		)	923
Net realized investment (gains) losses	(217		)	(46		)	(171		)	1,897		398			1,499
Adjusted pre-tax operating income / Adjusted net operating income	$	210,994		$	43,387		$	167,607		$	239,419	$	50,183		$	189,236

Reconciliation of Net income per diluted share to Adjusted net operating income per diluted share
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding							376,603								388,881

Net income per diluted share							$	0.46							$	0.49
Additional income tax provision related to IRS litigation							—								—		⁽¹⁾
Net realized investment losses							—								—		⁽¹⁾
Adjusted net operating income per diluted share							$	0.46							$	0.50

⁽¹⁾ For the three months ended June 30, 2018, the individual adjustments are each less than $0.01 per diluted share, but collectively aggregate to $0.01 per diluted share.

Reconciliation of Income before tax / Net income to Adjusted pre-tax operating income / Adjusted net operating income
	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019									2018
(In thousands, except per share amounts)	Pre-tax			Tax effect			Net (after-tax)			Pre-tax		Tax effect			Net (after-tax)
Income before tax / Net income	$	402,147		$	82,428		$	319,719		$	417,547	$	87,096		$	330,451
Adjustments:
Additional income tax provision related to IRS litigation	—			—			—			—		(1,631		)	1,631
Net realized investment losses	403			85			318			2,226		467			1,759
Adjusted pre-tax operating income / Adjusted net operating income	$	402,550		$	82,513		$	320,037		$	419,773	$	85,932		$	333,841

Reconciliation of Net income per diluted share to Adjusted net operating income per diluted share

Weighted average diluted shares outstanding							376,635								390,236

Net income per diluted share							$	0.87							$	0.87
Additional income tax provision related to IRS litigation							—								—		⁽¹⁾
Net realized investment losses							—								—		⁽¹⁾
Adjusted net operating income per diluted share							$	0.87							$	0.88

⁽¹⁾ For the six months ended June 30, 2018, the individual adjustments are each less than $0.01 per diluted share, but collectively aggregate to $0.01 per diluted share.

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 ~~2018~~2019 | 4437

~~Table of contents~~

Mortgage Insurance Portfolio

New insurance written

According to Inside Mortgage Finance and GSE estimates, total mortgage originations for the second quarter and first six months of ~~2018 decreased~~2019, on average, are estimated to have increased from the respective prior year ~~period primarily due to a decline in refinance transactions.~~periods. The total amount of mortgage originations is generally influenced by the level of new and existing home sales, the percentage of homes purchased for cash, and the level of refinance activity. PMI market share of total mortgage originations is influenced by the mix of purchase and refinance originations as PMI market share is 3-4 times higher for purchase originations than refinance originations. PMI market share is also impacted by the market share of total originations of the FHA, VA, USDA, and other alternatives to mortgage ~~insurance; and in the future, PMI market share may also be impacted by~~insurance, including GSE programs that may reduce or eliminate the demand for mortgage insurance.

NIW for the second quarter of ~~2018~~2019 was ~~$13.2~~$14.9 billion (Q2 ~~2017: $12.9~~2018: $13.2 billion) and for the first six months of ~~2018~~2019 was ~~$23.8~~$25.0 billion (YTD ~~2017: $22.2~~2018: $23.8 billion) ~~and continued to have what we believe are favorable underlying risk characteristics.~~. The percentage of NIW with DTI ratios greater than 45% was approximately 19% during the second quarter of 2018, and 20% for the first six months of 2018, up significantly from approximately 6% in the second quarter of 2017, and 10% in the first six months of 2017. Under our ~~2018 QSR Transactions, we may cede risk associated with~~ NIW with DTI ratios between 45% and 50%; however, the amount of risk we may cede in connection with such NIW in any quarter is limited to a percentage of all risk written and that percentage is materially below the percentage of risk written represented by such loans in the second quarter and first six months of 2018, respectively. To mitigate our risk from the increase in NIW written on loans with DTI ratios greater than 45%~~, effective~~ has declined in ~~March 2018~~2019, which we ~~changed our~~believe is due in part to changes in GSE underwriting guidelines ~~to require loans with DTI ratios greater than 45% to have a FICO score of at least 700. Further, effective July 2018, we added risk-based adjustments to~~and our ~~premium rates~~pricing for loans with such DTI ~~ratios greater than 45%. As a result of these changes and a change in GSE underwriting requirements, we expect loans with DTI ratios greater than 45% will be a lower percentage of our future NIW.~~ratios. We are continuing to monitor our exposure to such loans and may take further action. The percentage of purchase mortgages insured increased in the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the same period of the prior year because the level of refinance transactions declined as mortgage interest rates, on average, have increased during the first six months of 2018.

The following tables present characteristics of our primary NIW for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017.~~2018.



Primary NIW by FICO score		Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,				Primary NIW by FICO score
Primary NIW by FICO score	(% of primary NIW)	2018		2017		2018		2017
	760 and greater	43.1	%	42.8	%	42.4	%	42.6	%		Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	740 - 759	17.3	%	16.2	%	17.2	%	16.3	%
	720 - 739	14.6	%	14.0	%	14.6	%	14.1	%
	700 - 719	11.8	%	11.9	%	11.7	%	11.9	%
	680 - 699	6.9	%	8.0	%	7.2	%	7.9	%
	660 - 679	3.4	%	3.9	%	3.7	%	4.0	%
	640 - 659	2.1	%	2.3	%	2.2	%	2.3	%
	639 and less	0.8	%	0.9	%	1.0	%	0.9	%
(% of primary NIW)										(% of primary NIW)	2019		2018		2019		2018
760 and greater										760 and greater	43.9	%	43.1	%	42.9	%	42.4	%
740 - 759										740 - 759	18.0	%	17.3	%	17.7	%	17.2	%
720 - 739										720 - 739	13.6	%	14.6	%	14.0	%	14.6	%
700 - 719										700 - 719	11.4	%	11.8	%	11.7	%	11.7	%
680 - 699										680 - 699	7.3	%	6.9	%	7.4	%	7.2	%
660 - 679										660 - 679	3.3	%	3.4	%	3.6	%	3.7	%
640 - 659										640 - 659	1.7	%	2.1	%	1.9	%	2.2	%
639 and less										639 and less	0.8	%	0.8	%	0.9	%	0.9	%



Primary NIW by loan-to-value
	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
(% of primary NIW)	2019		2018		2019		2018
95.01% and above	16.1	%	15.4	%	16.7	%	14.4	%
90.01% to 95.00%	43.3	%	44.1	%	42.7	%	44.1	%
85.01% to 90.00%	27.9	%	28.8	%	28.2	%	28.9	%
80.01% to 85%	12.7	%	11.7	%	12.4	%	12.6	%



Primary NIW by debt-to-income ratio ⁽¹⁾
	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
(% of primary NIW)	2019		2018		2019		2018
45.01% and above	14.7	%	19.2	%	16.3	%	19.6	%
38.01% to 45.00%	31.9	%	32.1	%	32.8	%	31.9	%
38.00% and below	53.4	%	48.7	%	50.9	%	48.5	%

⁽¹⁾

In 2018, we started considering DTI ratios when setting our premium rates, and we changed our methodology for calculating DTI ratios for pricing and eligibility purposes to exclude the impact of mortgage insurance premiums. As a result of this change, loan originators may have changed the information they provide to us. Although we have changed our operational procedures to account for this, we cannot be sure that the DTI ratio we report for each loan beginning in late 2018 includes the related mortgage insurance premiums in the calculation.

Loan-to-Value Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
(% of primary NIW) 2018 2017 2018 2017
95.01% and above 15.4 % 9.7 % 14.4 % 9.0 %
90.01% to 95.00% 44.1 % 48.1 % 44.1 % 47.7 %
85.01% to 90.00% 28.8 % 29.9 % 28.9 % 30.1 %
80.01% to 85% 11.7 % 12.3 % 12.6 % 13.2 %

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 45~~

~~Table of contents~~



Primary NIW by policy payment type
	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
(% of primary NIW)	2019		2018		2019		2018
Monthly premiums	84.2	%	83.9	%	84.1	%	82.3	%
Single premiums	15.7	%	15.9	%	15.8	%	17.5	%
Annual premiums	0.1	%	0.2	%	0.1	%	0.2	%


Primary NIW by type of mortgage										Primary NIW by type of mortgage
											Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
Policy payment type		Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
Policy payment type	(% of primary NIW)	2018		2017		2018		2017
	Monthly premiums	83.9	%	81.7	%	82.3	%	82.3	%
	Single premiums	15.9	%	18.0	%	17.5	%	17.4	%
	Annual premiums	0.2	%	0.3	%	0.2	%	0.3	%
(% of primary NIW)										(% of primary NIW)	2019		2018		2019		2018
Purchases										Purchases	89.2	%	94.1	%	90.2	%	91.5	%
Refinances										Refinances	10.8	%	5.9	%	9.8	%	8.5	%

Type of mortgage Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
(% of primary NIW) 2018 2017 2018 2017
Purchases 94.1 % 91.3 % 91.5 % 87.9 %
Refinances 5.9 % 8.7 % 8.5 % 12.1 %

Insurance and risk in force

The amount of our IIF and RIF is impacted by the amount of NIW and cancellations of primary IIF during the period. Cancellation activity is primarily due to refinancing activity, but is also impacted by rescissions, cancellations due to claim payment, and policies cancelled when borrowers achieve the required amount of home equity. Refinancing activity has historically been affected by the level of mortgage interest rates and the level of home price appreciation. Cancellations generally move inversely to the change in the direction of interest rates, although they generally lag a change in direction.

Persistency

.Our persistency was 80.8% at June 30, 2019 compared to 81.7% at December 31, 2018 and 80.1% at June 30, ~~2018 compared to 80.1% at December 31, 2017 and 77.8% at June 30, 2017.~~2018. Since 2000, our year-end persistency ranged from a high of 84.7% at December 31, 2009 to a low of 47.1% at December 31, 2003. ~~With the current and expected level of mortgage interest rates we expect a low level of refinance activity and that our persistency will increase gradually in subsequent periods.~~

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2019 | 38

IIF and RIF Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
(In billions) 2018 2017 2018 2017
NIW $ 13.2
$ 12.9
$ 23.8
$ 22.2
Cancellations (10.0 ) (9.1 ) (18.0 ) (16.9 )
Increase in primary IIF $ 3.2
$ 3.8
$ 5.8
$ 5.3

(In billions) 2018 2017
Direct primary IIF as of June 30, $ 200.7
$ 187.3

Direct primary RIF as of June 30, $ 51.7
$ 48.5



IIF and RIF
	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(In billions)	2019			2018			2019			2018
NIW	$	14.9		$	13.2		$	25.0		$	23.8
Cancellations	(12.4		)	(10.0		)	(20.8		)	(18.0		)
Increase in primary IIF	$	2.5		$	3.2		$	4.2		$	5.8

(In billions)	2019			2018
Direct primary IIF as of June 30,	$	213.9		$	200.7
Direct primary RIF as of June 30,	$	55.2		$	51.7

Credit profile of our primary RIF

The proportion of our total primary RIF ~~that was~~ written after 2008 has been steadily ~~increasing.~~increasing in proportion to our total primary RIF. Our 2009 and later books possess significantly improved risk characteristics when compared to our 2005-2008 origination years. The ~~loans we insured beginning in 2009, on average, have substantially higher FICO scores and lower LTVs than those insured in 2005-2008. The~~ credit profile of our pre-2009 RIF has benefited from modification and refinance programs ~~such as HARP.~~making outstanding loans more affordable to borrowers with the goal of reducing the number of foreclosures. These programs included HAMP and HARP, ~~allows~~which expired at the end of 2016 and 2018, respectively, but have been replaced by other GSE modification programs. HARP allowed borrowers who ~~are~~were not delinquent, but who may not otherwise behave been able to refinance their loans under the current GSE underwriting standards due to, for example, the current LTV exceeding 100%, to refinance and lower their note rate. ~~Loans associated with 97.4% of all of our HARP modifications were current~~

As shown in the following table, as of June 30, ~~2018.~~ 2019 approximately 11% of our primary RIF has been modified.



Modifications
Policy year	HARP Modifications ⁽¹⁾		HAMP & Other Modifications
2003 and prior	9.7	%	46.5	%
2004	17.4	%	50.7	%
2005	25.3	%	48.5	%
2006	28.6	%	45.3	%
2007	41.0	%	35.1	%
2008	57.8	%	21.6	%
2009	47.2	%	9.5	%
2010 - Q2 2019	—	%	0.5	%

Total	5.4	%	6.0	%


⁽¹⁾	Includes proprietary programs that are substantially the same as HARP.

As of June 30, 2019, based on loan count, the loans associated with 97.7% of HARP modifications and 80.5% of HAMP and other modifications were current.

The aggregate of our ~~2009-2018~~2009-2019 books and our HARP modifications accounted for approximately ~~88%~~91% of our total primary RIF at June 30, ~~2018.~~

2019.



Primary RIF
($ in millions)	June 30, 2019				December 31, 2018				June 30, 2018
Policy Year	RIF		% of RIF		RIF		% of RIF		RIF		% of RIF
2009+	$	47,141	85	%	$	45,083	83	%	$	41,799	81	%
2005 - 2008 (HARP)	2,805		5	%	3,109		5	%	3,425		6	%
Other years (HARP)	196		1	%	229		1	%	266		1	%
Subtotal	50,142		91	%	48,421		89	%	45,490		88	%
2005- 2008 (Non-HARP)	4,287		8	%	4,796		9	%	5,289		10	%
Other years (Non-HARP)	775		1	%	846		2	%	965		2	%
Subtotal	5,062		9	%	5,642		11	%	6,254		12	%
Total Primary RIF	$	55,204	100	%	$	54,063	100	%	$	51,744	100	%

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 ~~2018~~2019 | 4639

~~Table of contents~~

Primary RIF ($ in millions) June 30, 2018 December 31, 2017 June 30, 2017
Policy Year RIF % of RIF RIF % of RIF RIF % of RIF
2009+ $ 41,799
81 % $ 39,248
78 % $ 35,996
74 %
2005 - 2008 (HARP) 3,425
6 % 3,773
7 % 4,169
8 %
Other years (HARP) 266
1 % 308
1 % 354
1 %
Subtotal 45,490
88 % 43,330
86 % 40,519
83 %
2005- 2008 (Non-HARP) 5,289
10 % 5,894
12 % 6,660
14 %
Other years (Non-HARP) 965
2 % 1,095
2 % 1,292
3 %
Subtotal 6,254
12 % 6,989
14 % 7,952
17 %
Total Primary RIF $ 51,744
100 % $ 50,319
100 % $ 48,471
100 %

Pool and other insurance

MGIC has written no new pool insurance since 2008; however, for a variety of reasons, including responding to capital market alternatives to PMI and customer demands, MGIC may write pool risk in the future. Our direct pool risk in force was ~~$443~~$393 million ($~~233~~215 million on pool policies with aggregate loss limits and ~~$210~~$178 million on pool policies without aggregate loss limits) at June 30, ~~2018~~2019 compared to ~~$471~~$419 million ($~~236~~228 million on pool policies with aggregate loss limits and ~~$235~~$191 million on pool policies without aggregate loss limits) at December 31, ~~2017.~~2018. If claim payments associated with a specific pool reach the aggregate loss limit, the remaining IIF within the pool would be cancelled and any remaining delinquencies under the pool would be removed from our delinquent inventory.

In connection with the ~~second quarter of 2018 we participated in GSE~~GSEs' credit risk transfer ~~transactions through a subsidiary~~programs, insurance subsidiaries of ~~MGIC. The transactions involve~~MGIC provide insurance ~~policies with a pool structure that cover loans upon delivery~~and reinsurance covering portions of the credit risk related to certain reference pools of mortgages acquired by the ~~GSE over a period~~GSEs. Our RIF, as reported to us, related to these programs was approximately $88 million as of ~~twelve months. Our committed participation in these transactions is an aggregate of $50 million of RIF. The transactions were immaterial to our financial statements for the three and six months ended~~ June 30, ~~2018.~~

In the third quarter of 2018 we participated in the Fannie Mae Enterprise-Paid Mortgage Insurance pilot through a subsidiary of MGIC. The transaction involves primary loan-level mortgage insurance, consistent with the loans we insure on a flow basis, that covers loans to be delivered to the GSE over a period of fourteen months. Our committed participation in this pilot is an aggregate of approximately $114 million of RIF.

2019.

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 ~~2018~~2019 | 4740

~~Table of contents~~

Consolidated Results of Operations

The following section of the MD&A provides a comparative discussion of MGIC Investment Corporation’s Consolidated Results of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017.~~2018.

Revenues

Revenues Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions) 2018 2017 % Change 2018 2017 % Change
Net premiums written $ 255.4
$ 245.8
4
$ 492.3
$ 482.5
2

Net premiums earned $ 247.0
$ 231.1
7
$ 479.1
$ 460.2
4
Investment income, net of expenses 34.5
29.7
16
66.6
59.2
13
Net realized investment losses (1.9 ) (0.1 ) N/M
(2.2 ) (0.2 ) N/M
Other revenue 2.4
2.5
(3 ) 4.3
4.9
(13 )
Total revenues $ 282.0
$ 263.3
7
$ 547.8
$ 524.2
5



Revenues
	Three Months Ended June 30,							Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)	2019		2018			% Change		2019			2018			% Change
Net premiums written	$	243.6	$	255.4		(5	)	$	487.9		$	492.3		(1	)

Net premiums earned	$	247.1	$	247.0		—		$	496.9		$	479.1		4
Investment income, net of expenses	42.4		34.5			23		83.0			66.6			25
Net realized investment gains (losses)	0.3		(1.9		)	N/M		(0.2		)	(2.2		)	N/M
Other revenue	2.5		2.4			2		4.3			4.3			—
Total revenues	$	292.3	$	282.0		4		$	584.0		$	547.8		7

Net premiums written and earned

Comparative quarterly results

NPW decreased and NPE was flat for the three months ended June 30, 2019 from the prior year reflecting an increase in ceded premiums compared to the same period of prior year, which offset an increase in premiums from a higher average insurance in force and a decrease in premium refunds from lower claim activity. The increase in ceded premiums was due to a non-recurring termination fee related to our 2015 QSR Transaction, premiums ceded under our Home Re Transactions, and a lower profit commission due to higher ceded losses. NPE also reflects lower premium rates on our IIF and an increase in premiums from single premium policy cancellations when compared to the prior year.

Comparative year to date results

NPW decreased and NPE ~~each~~ increased ~~from~~for the six months ended June 30, 2019 when compared to the prior year ~~period primarily due to lower~~period. NPW and NPE reflect an increase in ceded premiums ~~net, as~~compared to the same period of the prior year, which offset an increase in ~~profit commission more than offset the~~premiums from higher average insurance in force and a decrease in premium refunds from lower claim activity. The increase in ~~gross~~ ceded ~~premiums. The profit commission increased~~premiums was due to a ~~decrease in~~non-recurring termination fee related to our 2015 QSR Transaction, premiums ceded ~~losses, driven by primary loss reserve development. The increase in gross ceded premiums resulted from~~under our Home Re Transactions, and a higher percentage of our IIF covered ~~NIW~~by quota share reinsurance. The negative effect of higher ceded premiums and IIF having ~~LTVs 95% or greater and/or DTI ratios greater than 45%, both of which have higher premiums. The increase in NPW and~~lower premium rates on our NPE ~~also reflects~~was offset by an increase in ~~our IIF~~premiums from single premium policy cancellations when compared to the prior ~~year, however this impact is being offset in part by a lower premium yield.~~year.

See “Overview - Factors Affecting Our Results” above for additional factors that influenced the amount of net premiums written and earned during the periods.

Premium yield

Premium yield (NPE divided by average IIF) ~~decreased from~~for the ~~prior year periods to~~second quarter of 2019 was 46.5 basis points (Q2 2018: 49.6 basis points) and our premium yield for the six months ended June 30, 2019 was 46.9 basis points (YTD 2018: 48.5 basis ~~points for Q2 and YTD 2018, respectively, (Q2 2017: 49.9 basis points, YTD 2017 50.0) and~~points). Our premium yield is influenced by a number of key drivers, which have a varying impact from period to period.

~~The decline in our premium yield compared to the prior year periods reflects:~~

A larger percentage of our IIF from book years with lower premium rates due to a decline in premium rates in recent periods and certain policies undergoing premium rate resets on their ten-year anniversaries; offset in part by,

~~less of an adverse impact from our reinsurance driven by favorable primary loss reserve development, which resulted in a higher profit commission, and~~

~~less of an adverse impact from premium refunds primarily due to lower claim activity.~~

We changed our BPMI premium rates with effective dates in the second and third quarters of 2018. Based upon the mix of our NIW in the first quarter of 2018, the changed premiums would have resulted in an overall direct premium rate decrease for all NIW in the first quarter of 2018 of approximately 8.5%. Lender-paid single premium rates were not changed by our announcement. This premium rate decrease will affect our premium yield over time as older insurance policies with higher premium rates run off and new insurance policies with lower premium rates are written.

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 48~~

~~Table of contents~~

The following table reconciles our premium yield for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 from the respective prior year ~~periods.~~period.

Premium yield (in basis points) Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
Premium yield - June 30, 2017 49.9
50.0
Reconciliation:
Change in premium rates (3.5 ) (3.5 )
Change in premium refunds and accruals 1.3
1.0
Single premium policy persistency (0.3 ) —
Reinsurance 2.2
1.0
Premium yield - June 30, 2018 49.6
48.5



Premium yield
(in basis points)	Three Months Ended		Six Months Ended
Premium yield - June 30, 2018	49.6		48.5
Reconciliation:
Change in premium rates	(1.2	)	(1.3	)
Change in premium refunds and accruals	0.6		0.5
Single premium policy persistency	0.8		0.3
Reinsurance	(3.3	)	(1.1	)
Premium yield - June 30, 2019	46.5		46.9

Our premium yield declined when compared to the respective prior year periods and reflects the following:



Negative drivers:
è		A larger percentage of our IIF from book years with lower premium rates due to a decline in premium rates in recent years resulting from insuring mortgages with lower risk characteristics and pricing competition, and certain policies undergoing premium rate resets on their ten-year anniversaries, and
è		more of an adverse impact from our reinsurance primarily due to the non-recurring termination fee on our 2015 QSR Transaction and ceded premiums under our Home Re Transactions.
Positive drivers:
è		less of an adverse impact from premium refunds primarily due to lower claim activity, and
è		greater amounts of accelerated earned premium from cancellations of single premium policies prior to their estimated policy life, primarily due increased refinancing activity.

We expect our premium yield to decline in 2019, primarily due to lower average premium rates on our IIF.

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2019 | 41

Reinsurance agreements

Quota share reinsurance

Our quota share reinsurance affects various lines of our statements of operations and therefore we believe it should be analyzed by reviewing its total effect on our pre-tax income, described as follows.



è		We cede a fixed percentage of premiums on insurance covered by the agreements.
è		We receive the benefit of a profit commission through a reduction in the premiums we cede. The profit commission varies directly and inversely with the level of losses on a “dollar for dollar” basis and can be eliminated at loss levels significantly higher than we are currently experiencing. As a result, lower levels of losses result in a higher profit commission and less benefit from ceded losses; higher levels of losses result in more benefit from ceded losses and a lower profit commission (or for levels of losses we do not expect, its elimination).
è		We receive the benefit of a ceding commission through a reduction in underwriting expenses equal to 20% of premiums ceded (before the effect of the profit commission).
è		We cede a fixed percentage of losses incurred on insurance covered by the agreements.

We receive the benefit of a profit commission through a reduction in the premiums we cede. The profit commission varies directly and inversely with the level of losses on a “dollar for dollar” basis and is eliminated at levels of losses that we do not expect to occur. As a result, lower levels of losses result in a higher profit commission and less benefit from ceded losses; higher levels of losses result in more benefit from ceded losses and a lower profit commission (or for levels of losses we do not expect, its elimination).

~~We receive the benefit of a ceding commission through a reduction in underwriting expenses equal to 20% of premiums ceded (before the effect of the profit commission).~~

~~We cede a fixed percentage of losses incurred on insurance covered by the agreements.~~

The blended pre-tax cost of reinsurance under our different transactions is less than 6% (but will decrease if losses are materially higher than we expect). This blended pre-tax cost is derived by dividing the reduction in our pre-tax net income on loans covered by reinsurance by our direct (that is, without reinsurance) premiums from such loans. Although the pre-tax cost of the reinsurance under each transaction is generally constant, the effect of the reinsurance on the various components of pre-tax income discussed above will vary from period to period, depending on the level of ceded losses.

Covered risk

The amount of our NIW subject to our QSR Transactions as shown in the following table ~~below~~ will vary from period to period in part due to coverage limits that may be triggered depending on the mix of our risk written during the period. ~~For example, our 2018~~The 2019 QSR Transaction ~~excludes~~covering our 2019 NIW increased thresholds for risk written on loans with LTV ratios of ~~85%~~95% or greater and ~~below, but increases the coverage limit for risk written~~loans with ~~the following loan level characteristics~~DTI ratios greater than 45%, each when compared to our ~~2017~~2018 QSR ~~Transaction: (1) LTV ratios~~Transaction. The NIW subject to quota share reinsurance increased for the six months ended June 30, 2019 when compared to the same period of ~~95% and greater, and (2) DTI ratios greater than 45%. The number of~~the prior year due to the increased threshold on risk written on loans ~~we insured~~ with DTI ratios greater than 45% ~~increased~~and a decrease in the ~~second half~~percentage of ~~2017 after the requirements of the GSE underwriting guidelines were made more liberal, and remained elevated through the first half of 2018. Despite the increased coverage limit in~~ our ~~2018 QSR Transaction, the risk written in~~NIW with DTI ratios greater than 45%. In the first six months of 2018, the risk written on loans with DTI ratios greater than 45% exceeded the ~~coverage limit under~~threshold.

We terminated a portion of our ~~2018~~2015 QSR Transaction effective June 30, 2019 and entered into an amended quota share reinsurance agreement with certain participants from the existing reinsurance panel that effectively reduces the quota share cede rate from 30% to 15% on the remaining eligible insurance. During the second quarter of 2019, we incurred a termination fee of $6.8 million, which ~~contributed~~was paid in July to participants of the ~~decline~~reinsurance panel that are not participating in the ~~percentage of NIW~~amended 2015 QSR Transaction. Under the amended terms we will generally receive a profit commission provided that the loss ratio on the covered ~~in first six months of 2018 compared with the prior year period.~~loans remains below 68%.

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 49~~

~~Table of contents~~

The following ~~tables provide additional~~table provides information related to our quota share reinsurance agreements for ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017.~~2018.

Quota share reinsurance As of and For the Six Months Ended June 30,
($ in thousands, unless otherwise stated) 2018 2017
NIW subject to quota share reinsurance agreements 75 % 87 %
IIF subject to quota share reinsurance agreements 78 % 78 %

Statements of operations:
Ceded premiums written, net $ 54,468
$ 57,812
% of direct premiums written 10 % 11 %
Ceded premiums earned, net $ 54,468
$ 57,812
% of direct premiums earned 10 % 11 %
Profit commission $ 71,958
$ 63,442
Ceding commissions $ 25,285
$ 24,251
Ceded losses incurred $ 4,053
$ 9,111

Mortgage insurance portfolio:

Ceded RIF (in millions)
$ 12,236
$ 11,286



Quota share reinsurance
	As of and For the Six Months Ended June 30,
($ in thousands, unless otherwise stated)	2019			2018
NIW subject to quota share reinsurance agreements	83		%	75		%
IIF subject to quota share reinsurance agreements	78		%	78		%

Statements of operations:
Ceded premiums written and earned, net of profit commission	$	64,689		$	54,468
% of direct premiums written	12		%	10		%
% of direct premiums earned	11		%	10		%
Profit commission	75,902			71,958
Ceding commissions	26,765			25,285
Ceded losses incurred	5,116			4,053

Mortgage insurance portfolio:
Ceded RIF (in millions)	$	10,212		$	12,236

Captive reinsurance As of and For the Six Months Ended June 30,
($ in thousands) 2018 2017
IIF subject to captive reinsurance agreements — % 1 %

Statements of operations:
Ceded premiums written $ 37
$ 2,519
% of direct premiums written — % 0.5 %
Ceded premiums earned $ 84
$ 2,542
% of direct premiums earned — % 0.5 %
Ceded losses incurred $ 266
$ (37 )
Excess-of-loss reinsurance

Our excess-of-loss reinsurance provides $634.4 million of loss coverage on an existing portfolio of inforce policies having an inforce date on or after July 1, 2016 and before April 1, 2019. As of June 30, 2019, the aggregate exposed principal balances under the Home Re 2018-01 Ltd. and 2019-01 Ltd. transactions were approximately $6.6 billion and $7.1 billion, respectively, which take into account the mortgage insurance coverage percentage, net retained risk after quota share reinsurance, and the reinsurance inclusion percentage of the unpaid principal balance. We ceded premiums of $4.5 million and $7.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, respectively.

We expect that we may enter into similar excess-of-loss reinsurance transactions if capital market conditions remain favorable.

Investment income

Comparative quarterly and year to date results

Net investment income in the second quarter and first six months of ~~2018~~2019 was $42.4 million and $83.0 million, respectively, up from $34.5 million and $66.6 ~~million, respectively, up from $29.7 million and $59.2~~ million in the respective prior year periods. The increases in investment income were due to an increase in the average balance of the investment portfolio along with higher investment yields over the periods.

~~Net realized investment losses~~

~~Comparative quarterly and year to date results~~

Net realized investment losses in the second quarter and first six months of 2018 were $1.9 million and $2.2 million, respectively, primarily due to the impairment of certain municipal debt securities that we intend to sell at a loss. Net realized investment losses in each of the second quarter and first six months of 2017 were immaterial to our consolidated financial statements.

~~Other revenue~~

~~Comparative quarterly and year to date results~~

Other revenue for the second quarter and first six months of 2018 was $2.4 million and $4.3 million, down from $2.5 million and $4.9 million in the respective prior year periods primarily due to a decline in contract underwriting fees.

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 ~~2018~~2019 | 5042

~~Table of contents~~

Losses and expenses



Losses and expenses		Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,				Losses and expenses
Losses and expenses	(in millions)	2018			2017		2018		2017
	Losses incurred, net	$	(13.5	)	$	27.3	$	10.4	$	55.0		Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs	2.8			2.6		5.4		4.8
	Other underwriting and operating expenses, net	41.8			38.5		87.9		79.3
	Interest expense	13.3			14.2		26.5		30.5
	Loss on debt extinguishment	—			0.1		—		0.1
	Total losses and expenses	$	44.5		$	82.7	$	130.2	$	169.6
(In millions)											(In millions)	2019		2018			2019		2018
Losses incurred, net											Losses incurred, net	$	21.8	$	(13.5	)	$	60.9	$	10.4
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs											Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs	2.8		2.8			5.2		5.4
Other underwriting and operating expenses, net											Other underwriting and operating expenses, net	43.0		41.8			88.9		87.9
Interest expense											Interest expense	13.6		13.2			26.8		26.5
Total losses and expenses											Total losses and expenses	$	81.2	$	44.3		$	181.8	$	130.2

Losses incurred, net

As discussed in “Critical Accounting Policies” in our 2018 10-K MD&A and consistent with industry practices, we establish loss reserves for future claims only for loans that are currently delinquent. The terms “delinquent” and “default” are used interchangeably by us. We consider a loan to be delinquent when it is two or more payments past due. Loss reserves are established based on estimating the number of loans in our delinquent inventory that will result in a claim payment, which is referred to as the claim rate, and further estimating the amount of the claim payment, which is referred to as claim severity.

Estimation of losses is inherently judgmental. The conditions that affect the claim rate and claim severity include the current and future state of the domestic economy, including unemployment, and the current and future strength of local housing markets. The actual amount of the claim payments may be substantially different than our loss reserve estimates. Our estimates could be adversely affected by several factors, including a deterioration of regional or national economic conditions, including unemployment, leading to a reduction in borrower income and thus their ability to make mortgage payments, and a drop in housing values that could result in, among other things, greater losses on loans, and may affect borrower willingness to continue to make mortgage payments when the value of the home is below the mortgage balance. Historically, losses incurred have followed a seasonal trend in which the second half of the year has weaker credit performance than the first half, with higher new notice activity and a lower cure rate. Our estimates are also affected by any agreements we enter into regarding our claims paying practices, such as the settlement agreements discussed in Note 5 – “Litigation and Contingencies” to our consolidated financial statements. Changes to our estimates could result in a material impact to our consolidated results of operations and financial position, even in a stable economic environment.

Comparative quarterly results

Losses incurred, net in the second quarter of ~~2018~~2019 were ~~($13)~~$21.8 million compared to ~~$27~~($13.5) million in the prior ~~year period.~~year. The ~~decrease~~increase was ~~primarily~~ due to a ~~decrease~~lower amount of favorable loss reserve development on previously received delinquencies. During the second quarter of 2019 there was a $30 million reduction in losses ~~and LAE~~ incurred due to positive development on ~~defaults reported~~our primary loss reserves, before reinsurance, for previously received delinquent notices, compared to $70 million in the ~~current year. Losses~~second quarter of 2018. Current year losses incurred ~~on current year defaults~~ declined due to ~~16% fewer new delinquent notices received and~~ a lower estimated claim rate on ~~those~~new notices when compared to the prior ~~year period. Favorable development on prior year defaults occurred in the second quarter of 2018 and 2017 primarily due to a lower claim rate on previously received delinquencies.~~year.

Comparative year to date results

Losses incurred, net in the six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 were ~~$10.4~~$60.9 million compared to ~~$55.0~~$10.4 million in the prior year period. The ~~decrease~~increase was due to ~~a decrease in losses and LAE incurred~~lower favorable loss reserve development on ~~defaults reported~~previously received delinquencies in the current ~~year.~~year period, which includes the recognition of a probable loss of $23.5 million for litigation of our claims paying practices. Losses incurred on current year ~~defaults~~delinquencies declined primarily due to ~~9% fewer new delinquent notices received and~~ a lower estimated claim rate on ~~those~~new delinquent notices received compared to the prior ~~year period. Favorable development on prior year defaults occurred in the first six months of 2018 and 2017 primarily due to a lower claim rate on previously received delinquencies.~~

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 51~~

~~Table of contents~~

year.

Composition of losses incurred Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
2018 2017 % Change 2018 2017 % Change
Current year / New notices $ 49.3
$ 78.5
(37 ) $ 108.4
$ 158.9
(32 )
Prior year reserve development (62.7 ) (51.2 ) 23
(98.0 ) (103.9 ) (6 )
Losses incurred, net $ (13.5 ) $ 27.3
(149 ) $ 10.4
$ 55.0
(81 )



Composition of losses incurred
	Three Months Ended June 30,								Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)	2019			2018			% Change		2019			2018			% Change
Current year / New notices	$	46.6		$	49.3		(5	)	$	94.1		$	108.4		(13	)
Prior year reserve development	(24.8		)	(62.7		)	(61	)	(33.2		)	(98.0		)	(66	)
Losses incurred, net	$	21.8		$	(13.5	)	261		$	60.9		$	10.4		486




Loss ratio	~~Three Months Ended June 30,~~	~~Six Months Ended June 30,~~

The loss ratio is the ratio, expressed as a percentage, of the sum of incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses to net premiums earned. The ~~decline~~increase in the loss ratio infor the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 compared to the respective prior year periods was primarily due to ~~a lower level of~~an increase in losses incurred, ~~net.~~

net, offset in part by an increase in earned premiums.



	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019		2018		2019		2018
Loss ratio	8.8	%	(5.4	)%	12.3	%	2.2	%

New notice claim rate ~~- total~~

~~Three Months Ended June 30,~~

~~Six Months Ended June 30,~~


⁽¹⁾	~~Claim rate is the approximate quarterly rate.~~


⁽²⁾	~~Claim rate is the approximate year-to-date rate.~~

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 52~~

~~Table of contents~~




~~New notice claim rate - loans insured 2008 and prior~~	~~Three Months Ended June 30,~~	~~Six Months Ended June 30,~~

New notice activity continues to be primarily driven by loans insured in 2008 and prior, which continue to experience a cycle whereby many loans default, cure, and re-default. This cycle, along with the duration that defaults may ultimately remain in our notice inventory, results in significant judgment in establishing the estimated claim rate.

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2019 | 43



New notice claim rate
	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019		2018		2019		2018
New notices - 2008 and prior ⁽¹⁾	8,573		9,031		17,455		19,680
New notices - 2009 and later	4,342		3,128		9,009		7,102
Total	12,915		12,159		26,464		26,782
Claim rate	8.0	%	9.5	%	8.0	%	9.0	%
⁽¹⁾ previously delinquent %	94.0	%	93.0	%	94.0	%	92.0	%

Claims severity

Factors that impact claim severity include the exposure on the loan (the unpaid principal balance of the loan times our insurance coverage percentage), the amount of time between delinquency and claim filing (which impacts the amount of interest and expenses, with a longer period between delinquency and claim filing generally increasing severity), and curtailments. include:



è		exposure to the loan, which is the unpaid principal balance of the loan times our insurance coverage percentage,
è		length of time between delinquency and claim filing (which impacts the amount of interest and expenses, with a longer time between default and claim filing generally increasing severity), and
è		curtailments.

As discussed in Note 1211 - “Loss ~~Reserves”~~Reserves,”, the average time for servicers to process foreclosures has recently shortened. Therefore, we expect the average number of missed payments at the time a claim is received to be approximately 18 to 24 for new notices received, and expect to receive in 2019, compared to an average of ~~35 to 39~~37 missed payments at the claim received date for claims ~~received~~paid in ~~recent periods.~~2018. Our loss reserves estimates take into consideration trends over time, because the development of the delinquencies may vary from period to period without establishing a meaningful trend.

The majority of loans ~~insured prior to 2009~~from 2005 through 2008 (which represent 58% of the ~~majority of~~ loans in the delinquent inventory) are covered by master policy terms that, except under certain circumstances, do not limit the number of years ~~of interest~~ that an insured ~~may~~can include interest when filing a claim. Under our current master policy terms, an insured ~~may~~can include accumulated interest when filing a claim only for the first three years the loan is delinquent. In each case, the insured must comply with its obligations under the terms of the applicable master policy.

Claims severity trend Period Average exposure on claim paid Average claim paid % Paid to exposure Average number of missed payments at claim received date
Q2 2018 $ 44,522
$ 50,175
112.7 % 39
Q1 2018 45,597
51,069
112.0 % 38
Q4 2017 44,437
49,177
110.7 % 36
Q3 2017 43,313
46,389
107.1 % 35
Q2 2017 44,747
49,105
109.7 % 35
Q1 2017 44,238
49,110
111.0 % 35
Q4 2016 43,200
48,297
111.8 % 35
Q3 2016 43,747
48,050
109.8 % 34
Q2 2016 43,709
47,953
109.7 % 35
Q1 2016 44,094
49,281
111.8 % 34

Note: Table excludes material settlements. Settlements include amounts paid in settlement disputes for claims paying practices and commutations of pools of NPLs.



Claims severity trend for claims paid during the period
Period	Average exposure on claim paid		Average claim paid		% Paid to exposure		Average number of missed payments at claim received date
Q2 2019	$	46,950	$	46,883	99.9	%	34
Q1 2019	42,277		43,930		103.9	%	35
Q4 2018	45,366		47,980		105.8	%	35
Q3 2018	43,290		47,230		109.1	%	35
Q2 2018	44,522		50,175		112.7	%	38
Q1 2018	45,597		51,069		112.0	%	38
Q4 2017	44,437		49,177		110.7	%	36
Q3 2017	43,313		46,389		107.1	%	35
Q2 2017	44,747		49,105		109.7	%	35
Q1 2017	44,238		49,110		111.0	%	35

Note: Table excludes material settlements. Settlements include amounts paid in settlement disputes for claims paying practices and commutations of pools of NPLs.

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 53~~

~~Table of contents~~

In considering the potential sensitivity of the factors underlying our estimate of loss reserves, it is possible that even a relatively small change in our estimated claim rate or severity could have a material impact on reserves and, correspondingly, on our consolidated results of operations even in a stable economic environment. For example, as of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, assuming all other factors remain constant, a $1,000 increase/decrease in the average severity reserve factor would change the reserve amount by approximately +/- ~~$15~~$11 million. A 1 percentage point increase/decrease in the average claim rate reserve factor would change the reserve amount by approximately +/- ~~$20~~$17 million.

See Note 1211 – “Loss Reserves” to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our losses incurred and claims paying practices (including curtailments).

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2019 | 44

The length of time a loan is in the delinquent inventory (see Note 11- “Loss Reserves,” table 11.4) can differ from the number of payments that the borrower has not made or is considered delinquent. These differences typically result from a borrower making monthly payments that do not result in the loan becoming fully current. The number of payments that a borrower is delinquent is shown in the following table.



Delinquent inventory - number of payments delinquent
	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018		June 30, 2018
3 payments or less	14,071		15,519		14,178
4-11 payments	8,194		8,842		11,429
12 payments or more ⁽¹⁾	7,530		8,537		10,430
Total	29,795		32,898		36,037

3 payments or less	47	%	47	%	39	%
4-11 payments	27	%	27	%	32	%
12 payments or more	26	%	26	%	29	%
Total	100	%	100	%	100	%


⁽¹⁾	Approximately 35%, 38%, and 41% of the primary delinquent inventory with 12 payments or more delinquent has at least 36 payments delinquent as of June 30, 2019, December 31, 2018, and June 30, 2018, respectively.

Net losses and LAE paid

Net losses and LAE paid in the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 declined ~~49%~~54% and 43%, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year ~~primarily~~ due to lower claim activity on our primary business and ~~a decrease in claims paying practices and~~ NPL settlement ~~activity. We believe losses and LAE paid will continue to decline as~~activity in the ~~credit profile of our RIF continues to improve and our delinquent inventory declines.~~prior year.

The following table presents our net losses and LAE paid for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017.~~2018.



Net losses and LAE paid		Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,						Net losses and LAE paid
															Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(In millions)														(In millions)	2019			2018			2019			2018
Total primary (excluding settlements)														Total primary (excluding settlements)	$	52		$	75		$	104		$	155
Claims paying practices and NPL settlements ⁽¹⁾														Claims paying practices and NPL settlements ⁽¹⁾	—			14			—			21
Pool														Pool	—			1			1			3
Direct losses paid														Direct losses paid	52			90			105			179
Reinsurance														Reinsurance	(2		)	(3		)	(5		)	(14		)
Net losses paid														Net losses paid	50			87			100			165
LAE														LAE	5			4			12			8
Net losses and LAE paid	(In millions)	2018			2017			2018			2017			Net losses and LAE paid	$	55		$	91		112			173
	Total primary (excluding settlements)	$	75		$	126		$	155		$	256
	Claims paying practices and NPL settlements ⁽¹⁾	14			45			21			45
	Pool	1			4			3			6
	Direct losses paid	90			175			179			307
	Reinsurance	(3		)	(6		)	(14		)	(15		)
	Net losses paid	87			169			165			292
	LAE	4			4			8			9
	Net losses and LAE paid before terminations	91			173			173			301
	Reinsurance terminations	(2		)	—			(2		)	—
	Net losses and LAE paid	$	89		$	173		$	171		$	301
Reinsurance terminations														Reinsurance terminations	(14		)	(2		)	(14		)	(2		)
Net losses and LAE paid														Net losses and LAE paid	$	41		$	89		$	98		$	171


⁽¹⁾	See Note 1211 - “Loss Reserves” for additional information on our settlements of disputes for claims paying practices and commutations of NPLs.

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 54~~

~~Table of contents~~

Primary claims paid for the top 15 jurisdictions (based on ~~2018~~2019 losses paid) and all other jurisdictions for the three ~~and six~~ months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018 appears in the following table.



Paid losses by jurisdiction		Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,				Paid losses by jurisdiction
	(In millions)	2018		2017		2018		2017
	New Jersey	$	12	$	18	$	26	$	35		Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	New York	8		11		18		21
	Florida	9		14		15		30
	Illinois	6		7		11		15
	Maryland	5		7		10		14
	Pennsylvania	3		6		6		14
	California	4		6		6		10
	Ohio	2		4		4		8
	Massachusetts	2		4		4		8
	Connecticut	2		3		4		6
	Virginia	2		2		4		5
	Puerto Rico	2		5		3		10
	Georgia	1		2		3		6
	Texas	2		2		3		4
	Michigan	1		2		2		4
	All other jurisdictions	14		33		36		66
	Total primary (excluding settlements)	$	75	$	126	$	155	256
(In millions)										(In millions)	2019		2018		2019		2018
Florida										Florida	$	7	$	9	$	15	$	15
New York										New York	6		8		14		18
New Jersey										New Jersey	6		12		12		26
Illinois										Illinois	4		6		7		11
Puerto Rico										Puerto Rico	2		2		6		3
Maryland										Maryland	3		5		5		10
Pennsylvania										Pennsylvania	2		3		5		6
Ohio										Ohio	1		2		3		4
Connecticut										Connecticut	1		2		3		4
California										California	2		4		2		6
Virginia										Virginia	1		2		2		4
Texas										Texas	1		2		2		3
Massachusetts										Massachusetts	1		2		2		4
Michigan										Michigan	1		1		2		2
Georgia										Georgia	1		1		2		3
All other jurisdictions										All other jurisdictions	13		14		22		36
Total primary (excluding settlements)										Total primary (excluding settlements)	$	52	$	75	$	104	155

The primary average claim paid for the top 5 states (based on 2019 losses paid) for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 appears in the following table.



Primary average claim paid
	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019		2018		2019		2018
Florida*	$	65,399	$	61,281	$	66,667	$	58,893
New York*	108,858		96,747		108,975		97,145
New Jersey*	90,028		90,885		79,986		92,096
Illinois*	45,430		47,734		39,917		44,412
Puerto Rico*	38,883		51,337		43,174		47,406
All other jurisdictions	35,896		39,284		34,169		40,471
All jurisdictions	46,883		50,175		45,358		50,632

Note: Asterisk denotes jurisdictions in the table above that predominately use a judicial foreclosure process, which generally increases the amount of time it takes for a foreclosure to be completed.

The primary average claim paid can vary materially from period to period based upon a variety of factors, including the local market conditions, average loan amount, average coverage percentage, the amount of time between delinquency and claim filing, and our loss mitigation efforts on loans for which claims are paid.

~~2017 hurricane activity~~

Hurricane activity primarily impacting Texas, Florida, and Puerto Rico in the third quarter of 2017 increased the number of new notices of delinquency reported to us in the fourth quarter of 2017. The number of delinquent loans remain elevated in those jurisdictions while the amount of paid losses for the six months ended June 30, 2018 decreased in each of those jurisdictions compared to the same period of the prior year. Paid losses on all loans in those jurisdictions decreased in part because foreclosure moratoriums in the Texas and Florida IADAs through December 31, 2017 and Puerto Rico through May 31, 2018, impacted all delinquent loans in those areas, including those not affected by hurricanes. Based on our analysis and past experience, we expect the majority of delinquencies that we estimated to be caused by the hurricanes to cure and to not result in a material increase in our incurred losses or losses paid.

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 ~~2018~~2019 | 5545

~~Table of contents~~

~~The primary average claim paid for the top 5 states (based on 2018 losses paid) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 appears in the following table.~~

Primary average claim paid Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
2018 2017 2018 2017
New Jersey* $ 90,885
$ 85,846
$ 92,096
$ 86,363
New York* 96,747
79,821
97,145
82,911
Florida* 61,281
64,355
58,893
65,712
Illinois* 47,734
43,363
44,412
46,506
Maryland 76,823
78,315
77,482
78,820
All other jurisdictions 37,407
39,680
38,291
39,229
All jurisdictions 50,175
49,105
50,632
49,108

~~Note: Asterisk denotes jurisdictions in the table above that predominately use a judicial foreclosure process, which generally increases the amount of time it takes for a foreclosure to be completed~~.

The primary average RIF on delinquent loans at June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, December 31, ~~2017~~2018 and June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and for the top 5 jurisdictions (based on ~~2018~~2019 losses paid) appears in the following table.



Primary average RIF - delinquent loans		June 30, 2018		December 31, 2017		June 30, 2017		Primary average RIF - delinquent loans
	New Jersey	$	66,450	$	65,684	$	65,473
	New York	71,933		71,260		70,241			June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018		June 30, 2018
	Florida	55,041		54,872		54,029
	Illinois	40,501		40,794		41,692
	Maryland	66,720		66,266		65,647
	All other jurisdictions	40,204		39,848		39,732
	All jurisdictions	45,305		45,153		44,828
Florida								Florida	$	53,333	$	53,371	$	55,039
New York								New York	72,057		71,795		71,933
New Jersey								New Jersey	66,284		65,521		66,465
Illinois								Illinois	40,339		39,753		40,505
Puerto Rico								Puerto Rico	34,704		35,420		36,569
All other jurisdictions								All other jurisdictions	41,798		41,331		41,508
All jurisdictions								All jurisdictions	44,915		44,584		45,302

The primary average RIF on all loans was ~~$50,075, $49,142,~~$51,791, $51,085, and ~~$48,163~~$50,075 at June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, December 31, ~~2017~~2018, and June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, respectively.

Loss reserves

Our primary delinquency rate at June 30, ~~2018~~2019 was ~~3.49%~~2.80% (YE ~~2017: 4.55%~~2018: 3.11%, June 30, ~~2017: 4.11%~~2018: 3.49%). Our primary delinquent inventory was ~~36,037~~29,795 loans at June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, representing a decrease of ~~23%~~9% from December 31, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~13%~~17% from June 30, ~~2017.~~2018. The reduction in our primary delinquent inventory is the result of the total number of delinquent loans: (1) that have cured; (2) for which claim payments have been made; or (3) that have resulted in rescission, claim denial, or removal from inventory due to settlements of claims paying disputes or commutations of coverage of pools of NPLs, collectively, exceeding the total number of new delinquencies on insured loans. In recent periods, we have experienced improved cure rates and the number of delinquencies in inventory with twelve or more missed payments has been declining. Generally, a defaulted loan with fewer missed payments is less likely to result in a claim.

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 56~~

~~Table of contents~~

The gross reserves at June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, and June 30, ~~2017~~2018 appear in the table below.

Gross reserves June 30, 2018 December 31, 2017 June 30, 2017
Primary:
Direct loss reserves (in millions) $ 746
$ 913
$ 1,093

IBNR and LAE 53
58
72

Total primary loss reserves $ 799
$ 971
$ 1,165

Ending delinquent inventory 36,037
46,556
41,317
Percentage of loans delinquent (delinquency rate) 3.49 % 4.55 % 4.11 %
Average total primary loss reserves per delinquency $ 22,178
$ 20,851
$ 28,206
Primary claims received inventory included in ending delinquent inventory 827
954
1,258

Pool ⁽¹⁾:

Direct loss reserves (in millions):

With aggregate loss limits $ 9
$ 10
$ 15

Without aggregate loss limits 4
4
6

Total pool direct loss reserves $ 13
$ 14
$ 21

Ending default inventory:

With aggregate loss limits 779
952
1,124
Without aggregate loss limits 288
357
387
Total pool ending delinquent inventory 1,067
1,309
1,511
Pool claims received inventory included in ending delinquent inventory 49
42
63
Other gross reserves (in millions) $ 1
$ 1
$ 1



Gross reserves
	June 30, 2019					December 31, 2018					June 30, 2018
Primary:
Direct loss reserves (in millions)	$	537				$	610				$	746
IBNR and LAE	73					50					53
Total primary loss reserves	$	610				$	660				$	799

Ending delinquent inventory			29,795					32,898					36,037
Percentage of loans delinquent (delinquency rate)			2.80		%			3.11		%			3.49		%
Average total primary loss reserves per delinquency			$	19,684				$	20,077				$	22,178
Primary claims received inventory included in ending delinquent inventory			630					809					827

Pool ⁽¹⁾:
Direct loss reserves (in millions):
With aggregate loss limits	$	9				$	10				$	9
Without aggregate loss limits	2					3					4
Total pool direct loss reserves	$	11				$	13				$	13

Ending default inventory:
With aggregate loss limits			432					595					779
Without aggregate loss limits			209					264					288
Total pool ending delinquent inventory			641					859					1,067
Pool claims received inventory included in ending delinquent inventory			19					24					49
Other gross reserves (in millions)	$	1				$	1				$	1


⁽¹⁾	Since a number of our pool policies include aggregate loss limits and/or deductibles, we do not disclose an average direct reserve per delinquency for our pool business.

~~2017 hurricane~~

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2019 | 46

Hurricane activity

2017 hurricanes.Hurricane activity primarily impacting Texas, Florida, and Puerto Rico in the third quarter of 2017 increased the number of new notices of delinquency reported to us in the fourth quarter of 2017. ~~Based on~~Consistent with our analysis and past experience, ~~we expect~~ the majority of the delinquent notices in the hurricane affected areas that we estimated to be caused by the hurricanes ~~to cure~~have cured and todid not result in a material increase in our incurred losses or losses paid. Paid losses on all loans in those jurisdictions were impacted in part because foreclosure moratoriums in the Texas and Florida IADAs through December 31, 2017 and Puerto Rico through May 31, 2018, impacted all delinquent loans in those areas, including those not affected by hurricanes. For those notices we estimated to be caused by the hurricanes, we established our loss reserves with a lower estimated claim rate than the claim rate we applied to other notices in our delinquent inventory. The decline in the average total primary reserves per delinquency as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively, when compared to June 30, 2017, was due in part to the reserving on the estimated hurricane notices. When excluding the impact of those notices we estimated to be caused by the hurricanes, the average total primary loss reserves per delinquency was approximately $24,000 at ~~both~~ June 30, ~~2018 and December 31, 2017.~~ 2018.

See our risk factors titled “Our financial results may be adversely impacted by natural disasters; certain ~~2017~~ hurricanes may impact our incurred losses, the amount and timing of paid claims, our inventory of notices of default and our Minimum Required Assets under PMIERs.” and “Downturns in the domestic economy or declines in the value of borrowers’ homes from their value at the time their loans closed may result in more homeowners defaulting and our losses increasing, with a corresponding decrease in our returns” for factors that could cause our actual results to differ from our expectations expressed in this paragraph.

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 57~~

~~Table of contents~~

The primary delinquent inventory for the top 15 jurisdictions (based on ~~2018~~2019 losses paid) at June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, December 31, ~~2017~~2018 and June 30, ~~2017~~2018 appears in the following table.



Primary delinquent inventory by jurisdiction		June 30, 2018	December 31, 2017	June 30, 2017	Primary delinquent inventory by jurisdiction
	New Jersey*	1,318	1,749	2,003
	New York*	2,034	2,387	2,587
	Florida*	4,101	6,501	3,311		June 30, 2019	December 31, 2018	June 30, 2018
	Illinois*	1,797	2,136	2,195
	Maryland	876	1,026	1,098
	Pennsylvania*	2,049	2,403	2,488
	California	1,236	1,402	1,371
	Ohio*	1,648	2,025	2,096
	Massachusetts	629	759	867
	Connecticut*	505	574	577
	Virginia	627	731	705
	Puerto Rico*	2,377	3,761	1,614
	Georgia	1,252	1,550	1,577
	Texas	2,682	3,975	2,775
	Michigan	1,032	1,260	1,256
	All other jurisdictions	11,874	14,317	14,797
	Total primary delinquent inventory	36,037	46,556	41,317
Florida*					Florida*	2,497	2,853	4,101
New York*					New York*	1,692	1,855	2,034
New Jersey*					New Jersey*	986	1,151	1,318
Illinois*					Illinois*	1,610	1,781	1,797
Puerto Rico*					Puerto Rico*	1,257	1,503	2,377
Maryland					Maryland	785	842	876
Pennsylvania*					Pennsylvania*	1,769	1,929	2,049
Ohio*					Ohio*	1,449	1,627	1,648
Connecticut*					Connecticut*	468	480	505
California					California	1,178	1,260	1,236
Virginia					Virginia	586	588	627
Texas					Texas	2,136	2,369	2,682
Massachusetts					Massachusetts	525	596	629
Michigan					Michigan	932	1,041	1,032
Georgia					Georgia	1,112	1,220	1,252
All other jurisdictions					All other jurisdictions	10,813	11,803	11,874
Total					Total	29,795	32,898	36,037

Note: Asterisk denotes jurisdictions in the table above that predominately use a judicial foreclosure process, which generally increases the amount of time it takes for a foreclosure to be completed.

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2019 | 47

The primary delinquent inventory by policy year at June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, December 31, ~~2017~~2018 and June 30, ~~2017~~2018 appears in the following table.



Primary delinquent inventory by policy year		June 30, 2018	December 31, 2017	June 30, 2017	Primary delinquent inventory by policy year
	Policy year:
	2004 and prior	6,949	8,739	9,016
	2005	3,893	4,916	4,739		June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018		June 30, 2018
Policy year:					Policy year:
2004 and prior					2004 and prior	5,451		6,061		6,949
2004 and prior %					2004 and prior %	18	%	18	%	19	%
2005					2005	3,029		3,340		3,893
2006					2006	4,780		5,299		5,987
2007					2007	7,429		8,702		9,837
2008					2008	1,934		2,369		2,688
2005 - 2008 %					2005 - 2008 %	58	%	60	%	62	%
2009					2009	154		172		204
2010					2010	115		121		151
2011					2011	156		159		193
2012					2012	245		312		386
2013					2013	502		592		689
2014					2014	1,021		1,264		1,272
2015					2015	1,292		1,418		1,447
2016					2016	1,393		1,459		1,449
2017					2017	1,476		1,282		860
2018					2018	772		348		32
2019					2019	46		—		—
2009 and later %					2009 and later %	24	%	22	%	19	%
	2006	5,987	7,719	7,476
	2007	9,837	12,807	12,642
	2008	2,688	3,455	3,352
	2009	204	315	319
	2010	151	199	178
	2011	193	266	203
	2012	386	549	327
	2013	689	957	581
	2014	1,272	1,757	1,044
	2015	1,447	1,992	947
	2016	1,449	1,930	469
	2017	860	955	24
	2018	32	—	—
	Total primary delinquent inventory	36,037	46,556	41,317
Total					Total	29,795		32,898		36,037

The delinquent inventory for most policy years includes delinquencies from hurricane impacted areas that have not cured. As a result, delinquencies, including in our most recent policy years, were greater than they otherwise would have been as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. Within the hurricane impacted areas,

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 58~~

~~Table of contents~~

~~there were 7,828, 12,446, and 5,958 loans in our ending primary~~ delinquent inventory as of June 30, 2018 included delinquencies from hurricane impacted areas, of which a majority had cured as of December 31, ~~2017, and June 30, 2017, respectively.~~2018.




~~Delinquent inventory mix by book year~~

The losses we have incurred on our 2005 through 2008 books have exceeded our premiums from those books. Although uncertainty remains with respect to the ultimate losses we may experience on those books, as we continue to write new insurance, those books have become a smaller percentage of our total mortgage insurance portfolio. Our 2005 through 2008 books represented approximately ~~17%~~13% and ~~19%~~15% of our total primary RIF at June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, respectively. Approximately 40% and 39% of the remaining primary RIF on our 2005 through 2008 books of business benefited from HARP as of ~~both~~ June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017.~~2018, respectively.

On our primary business, the highest claim frequency years have typically been the third and fourth year after loan origination. However, the pattern of claim frequency can be affected by many factors, including persistency and deteriorating economic conditions. Deteriorating economic conditions can result in increasing claims following a period of declining claims. As of June 30, ~~2018, 51%~~2019, 49% of our primary RIF was written subsequent to December 31, 2016, 64% of our primary RIF was written subsequent to December 31, 2015, ~~64%~~and 74% of our primary RIF was written subsequent to December 31, ~~2014, and 72% of our primary RIF was written subsequent to December 31, 2013.~~2014.

Underwriting and other expenses, net

Underwriting and other expenses includes items such as employee compensation costs, fees for professional services, depreciation and maintenance expense, and premium taxes, and are reported net of ceding commissions.

~~Comparative quarterly and year to date results~~

Underwriting and other expenses, net for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 were $43.0 million and $88.9 million, respectively, increases from $41.8 million and $87.9 ~~million, respectively, up from $38.5 million and $79.3~~ million in the respective prior year ~~periods. The increase was~~periods primarily due to ~~higher share-based compensation, due to a higher share price on the grant date, and non-executive compensation.~~

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 59~~

~~Table of contents~~

increases in benefits expenses.




~~Underwriting expense ratio~~	~~Three Months Ended June 30,~~	~~Six Months Ended June 30,~~



	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019		2018		2019		2018
Underwriting expense ratio	17.6	%	16.4	%	18.3	%	17.9	%

The underwriting expense ratio is the ratio, expressed as a percentage, of the underwriting and operating expenses, net and amortization of DAC of our combined insurance operations (which excludes underwriting and operating expenses of our non-insurance subsidiaries) to NPW. The underwriting expense ratio in the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 increased compared to the respective prior year periods. The ~~increase~~increases in the ratio ~~was primarily due to higher compensation expenses in the current year periods, offset in part by higher NPW in both current year periods.~~

~~Interest expense~~

~~Comparative quarterly and year to date results~~

~~Interest expense~~ for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2018 was $13.2 million and $26.5 million, respectively, down from $14.2 million and $30.5 million~~2019 were primarily due to decreases in NPW when compared to the same periods in the ~~respective~~ prior ~~year periods. The decreases were due to the maturity of the 5% Notes and conversion of the 2% Notes in 2017.~~year.

Provision for income taxes and effective tax rate



Income tax provision and effective tax rate		Three Months Ended June 30,								Six Months Ended June 30,								Income tax provision and effective tax rate
	(in millions, except rate)	2018			2017			% Change		2018			2017			% Change
	Income before tax	$	237.5		$	180.6		32		$	417.5		$	354.6		18
	Provision for income taxes	$	50.7		$	62.0		(18	)	$	87.1		$	146.2		(40	)		Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	Effective tax rate	21.3		%	34.3		%	N/M		20.9		%	41.2		%	N/M
(in millions, except rate)																		(in millions, except rate)	2019			2018			2019			2018
Income before tax																		Income before tax	$	211.2		$	237.5		$	402.1		$	417.5
Provision for income taxes																		Provision for income taxes	$	43.4		$	50.7		$	82.4		$	87.1
Effective tax rate																		Effective tax rate	20.5		%	21.3		%	20.5		%	20.9		%

The decrease in the effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2018 and for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same periods in the prior year is primarily due to the decrease in the statutory income tax rate to 21% in 2018 from 35% in 2017. The six months ended June 30, 2017 also included an additional provision for the expected settlement of our IRS litigation.

~~See~~ ~~Note 11 – “Income Taxes”~~ ~~to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our tax position.~~

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 ~~2018~~2019 | 6048

~~Table of contents~~

Balance Sheet Review

Total assets, liabilities, and shareholders’ equity

As of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, total assets were ~~$5.6~~$6.1 billion, ~~approximately the same as year-end 2017,~~an increase of $378 million, and total liabilities were ~~$2.3~~$2.0 billion, down ~~approximately $0.2 billion from year-end 2017.~~$76 million, each when compared to December 31, 2018. Shareholders’ equity increased approximately ~~$0.2 billion~~$454 million primarily due to net income in the first six months of ~~2018, offset in part by repurchases of shares of our common stock~~2019 and ~~a decrease~~an increase in the fair value of our investment ~~portfolio.~~portfolio, offset in part by repurchases of our common stock.

The following sections mainly focus on our cash and cash equivalents, investments, deferred income taxes, net, and loss reserves as these reflect the major developments in our assets and liabilities since December 31, ~~2017.~~2018.

Consolidated balance sheets - Assets

as of June 30, ~~2018~~ 2019 (In thousands)


●	Cash and cash equivalents	$	191,894	Cash and cash equivalents	$	225,183
●	Investments	4,933,395		Investments	5,512,037
●	Premiums receivable	56,213		Premiums receivable	57,492
●	Deferred income taxes, net	161,488		Deferred income taxes, net	20,932
●	Other assets	249,026		Other assets	239,893

Cash and cash equivalents (including restricted) - Our cash and cash equivalents balance increased to ~~$192~~$225 million as of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, from ~~$100~~$155 million as of December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, as net cash generated from operating activities was only partly offset by net cash used in investing and financing activities.

Deferred income taxes, net- The decrease in our deferred income taxes, net, to ~~$161~~$21 million as of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, from ~~$234~~$69 million as of December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, was primarily due to the ~~utilization~~tax effect of ~~federal net operating loss carryforwards as we~~unrealized gains generated ~~net income~~by the investment portfolio during the first six months of ~~2018.~~2019.

Consolidated balance sheets - Liabilities and equity

as of June 30, ~~2018~~ 2019 (In thousands)


●	Loss reserves	$	813,015	Loss reserves	$	621,902
●	Unearned premiums	406,159		Unearned premiums	400,999
●	Long-term debt	831,008		Long-term debt	832,162
●	Other liabilities	227,959		Other liabilities	164,809
●	Shareholders’ equity	3,313,875		Shareholders’ equity	4,035,665

Loss reserves - Our loss reserves include: (1) reserves representing estimates of losses and settlement expenses on reported delinquencies and (2) IBNR. Our gross reserves are reduced by reinsurance recoverable on our estimated losses and settlement expenses to calculate a net reserve balance. The net reserve balance decreased by ~~17%~~6% to ~~$776~~$604 million as of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, from ~~$937~~$641 million as of December 31, ~~2017.~~2018. Reinsurance recoverables on our estimated losses and settlement expenses were ~~$37~~$18 million and ~~$48~~$33 million as of June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, respectively. The overall decrease in our loss reserves during the first six months of ~~2018~~2019 was due to a higher level of losses paid relative to losses incurred.

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 ~~2018~~2019 | 6149

~~Table of contents~~

Investment portfolio

The average duration and investment yield of our investment portfolio as of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, and June 30, ~~2017~~2018 are shown in the table below.



Portfolio duration and embedded investment yield		June 30, 2018	December 31, 2017	June 30, 2017	Portfolio duration and embedded investment yield
Portfolio duration and embedded investment yield	Duration (in years)	4.2	4.3	4.6
	Pre-tax yield ⁽¹⁾ (% of average investment portfolio assets)	2.9%	2.7%	2.7%		June 30, 2019	December 31, 2018	June 30, 2018
	After-tax yield ⁽¹⁾ (% of average investment portfolio assets)	2.4%	2.0%	2.0%
Duration (in years)					Duration (in years)	4.0	4.1	4.2
Pre-tax yield ⁽¹⁾					Pre-tax yield ⁽¹⁾	3.2%	3.1%	2.9%
After-tax yield ⁽¹⁾					After-tax yield ⁽¹⁾	2.6%	2.6%	2.4%


⁽¹⁾	Embedded investment yield is calculated on a yield-to-worst basis.

~~The increase in the investment portfolio’s after-tax yield as of June 30, 2018, relative to the prior periods presented is primarily being driven by the decrease in the statutory income tax rate.~~

The security ratings of our fixed income investments as of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, and June 30, ~~2017~~2018 are shown in the ~~table below.~~following table.



Fixed income security ratings		Security Ratings ⁽¹⁾				Fixed income security ratings
	Period	AAA	AA	A	BBB
	June 30, 2018	21%	24%	35%	20%		Security Ratings ⁽¹⁾
	December 31, 2017	21%	26%	36%	17%
	June 30, 2017	23%	28%	35%	14%
Period						Period	AAA	AA	A	BBB
June 30, 2019						June 30, 2019	21%	22%	33%	24%
December 31, 2018						December 31, 2018	19%	23%	33%	25%
June 30, 2018						June 30, 2018	21%	24%	35%	20%


⁽¹⁾	Ratings are provided by one or more of: Moody's, Standard & Poor's and Fitch Ratings. If three ratings are available, the middle rating is utilized; otherwise the lowest rating is utilized.

~~The decrease~~Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Home Re 2018-1 Ltd. and Home Re 2019-1 Ltd. are special purpose variable interest entities that are not consolidated in our consolidated financial statements because we do not have the ~~statutory tax rate reduced the after-tax yield benefit~~unilateral power to direct those activities that ~~tax exempt municipal securities provided when compared~~are significant to ~~taxable fixed income securities. We will continue~~their economic performance. See Note 4 - “Reinsurance,” to ~~evaluate the benefits of tax exempt securities relative to taxable securities, and to the investment portfolio as a whole, and their concentration may vary over time.~~our consolidated financial statements for additional information.

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 ~~2018~~2019 | 6250

~~Table of contents~~

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Consolidated Cash Flow Analysis

We have three primary types of cash flows: (1) operating cash flows, which consist mainly of cash generated by our insurance operations and income earned on our investment portfolio, less amounts paid for claims, interest expense and operating expenses, (2) investing cash flows related to the purchase, sale and maturity of investments and purchases of property and equipment and (3) financing cash flows generally from activities that impact our capital structure, such as changes in debt and shares outstanding. The following table summarizes our consolidated cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities:



Summary of consolidated cash flows		Six Months Ended June 30,						Summary of consolidated cash flows
	(In thousands)	2018			2017
	Total cash provided by (used in):
	Operating activities	$	262,593		$	125,556			Six Months Ended June 30,
	Investing activities	(62,418		)	5,419
	Financing activities	(108,132		)	(158,477		)
	Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	$	92,043		$	(27,502	)
(In thousands)								(In thousands)	2019			2018
Total cash provided by (used in):								Total cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities								Operating activities	$	281,611		$	262,593
Investing activities								Investing activities	(169,233		)	(62,418		)
Financing activities								Financing activities	(42,233		)	(108,132		)
Increase in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents								Increase in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents	$	70,145		$	92,043

Net cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 increased compared to the same period of ~~2017~~2018 primarily due to a lower level of losses paid, ~~net.~~net and an increase in net premiums written, offset in part by an increase in tax payments.

Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2019 reflects purchases of fixed income securities in an amount that exceeded our proceeds from sales and maturities of fixed income securities during the period as cash from operations was available for additional investment.

Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2018 reflects purchases of fixed income securities in an amount that exceeded our proceeds from the sales and maturities of fixed income securities during the ~~quarter~~period as cash from operations was available for additional investment, as well as, amounts spent on property and equipment.

Net cash ~~from investing~~used in financing activities for the six months ended June 30, ~~2017~~2019 reflects ~~proceeds from sales and maturities~~the cash settlement of ~~fixed income securities, and unsettled investment activity, that exceeded purchases~~share repurchase transactions executed at the end of ~~fixed income securities~~the fourth quarter of 2018, share repurchases during the ~~quarter, offset in part by amounts spent on property~~period, and ~~equipment.~~payment of withholding taxes related to share-based compensation net share settlement.

Net cash used in financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2018 reflects ~~repurchases of our common stock during the second quarter and the payment of withholding taxes related to share-based compensation net~~ share ~~settlement.~~

Net cash used in financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2017 includes the repayment at maturity of our 5% Notes and redemption of a portion of our 2% Notes, as well as, expenses paid to establish the revolving credit facilityrepurchases and the payment of withholding taxes related to share-based compensation net share settlement.

Capitalization

Debt ~~at our holding company and holding company liquidity~~

~~Debt~~ - holding company

As of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, our holding company’s debt obligations were $814.5 million in aggregate principal consisting of our

5.75% Notes and 9% Debentures. MGIC’s ownership of $132.7 million of our holding company’s 9% Debentures is eliminated in consolidation, but they remain outstanding obligations owed by our holding company to MGIC.

Liquidity analysis - holding company

As of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, we had approximately ~~$191~~$333 million in cash and investments at our holding company. These resources are maintained primarily to service our debt interest expense, pay debt maturities, repurchase shares, pay dividends to shareholders, and to settle intercompany obligations. While these assets are held, we generate investment income that serves to offset a portion of our interest expense. Investment income and the payment of dividends from our insurance

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 63~~

~~Table of contents~~

subsidiaries are the principal sources of holding company cash inflow. MGIC is the principal source of dividends, and their payment is restricted by insurance regulation. See Note 1514 - “Statutory Information” to our consolidated financial statement for additional information about MGIC’s dividend restrictions. The payment of dividends from MGIC is also influenced by our view of the appropriate level of PMIERs Available Assets to maintain an excess over Minimum Required Assets. Other sources of holding company liquidity include ~~any unused capacity on our unsecured revolving credit facility ($175 million) and~~ raising capital in the public markets. The ability to raise capital in the public markets is subject to prevailing market conditions, investor demand for the securities to be issued, and our deemed creditworthiness.

~~During~~In the second quarter of ~~2018,~~2019 we used ~~approximately $100~~$25 million of ~~available~~ holding company cash to repurchase shares ~~of our common stock. We~~and may use additional holding company cash to repurchase additional shares or to repurchase our outstanding debt obligations. Such repurchases may be material, may be made for cash (funded by debt) and/or exchanges for other securities, and may be made in open market purchases, privately negotiated acquisitions or other transactions. See “Overview - Capital” of this MD&A for a discussion of the additional share repurchase program authorized ~~on April 26, 2018.~~in March 2019.

In the first six months of ~~2018,~~2019, our holding company cash and investments ~~decreased~~increased by ~~$26~~$85 million, to ~~$191~~$333 million as of June 30, ~~2018.~~ 2019.

Cash inflows during the first six ~~months included $100~~months:

$140 million of dividends received from MGIC,

$8 million of investment income, and

$4 million of other ~~inflows of $4 million.~~ inflows.

Cash outflows during the first six ~~months at our holding company included $100 million of share repurchases and $30~~months:

$30 million of interest payments on our 5.75% Notes and 9% ~~Debentures.~~ Debentures,

$25 million of share repurchase transactions,

$12 million for share repurchase transactions in 2018 that settled in the first quarter of 2019.

We expect MGIC to continue to pay quarterly dividends of at least ~~$50~~the $70 million ~~per quarter for~~amount paid in each of the ~~remainder~~first and second quarters of ~~2018.~~2019, subject to approval by MGIC’s board of directors and non-disapproval by the OCI.

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2019 | 51

The net unrealized ~~losses~~gains on our holding company investment portfolio were approximately $3$2.3 million at June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and the portfolio had a modified duration of approximately 1.8 years.

Subject to certain limitations and restrictions, holders of each of the 9% Debentures may convert their notes into shares of our common stock at their option prior to certain dates under the terms of their issuance, in which case our corresponding obligation will be eliminated.

See Note 7 – “Debt” to our consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2017~~2018 for additional information about the conversion terms of our 9% Debentures and the terms of our indebtedness, including our option to defer interest on our 9% Debentures. The description in Note 7 - “Debt” to our consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K is qualified in its entirety by the terms of the notes and debentures.

Although not anticipated in the near term, we may also contribute funds to our insurance operations to comply with the PMIERs or the State Capital Requirements. See “Overview - Capital” above for a discussion of these requirements. See discussion of our non-insurance contract underwriting services in Note 5 – “Litigation and Contingencies” to our consolidated financial statements for other possible uses of holding company resources.

Debt at subsidiaries

MGIC is a member of the FHLB, which provides MGIC access to an additional source of liquidity via a secured lending facility. MGIC has $155.0 million of debt outstanding in the form of a fixed rate advance from the FHLB. Interest on the Advance is payable monthly at an annual rate, fixed for the term of the Advance, of 1.91%. The principal of the Advance matures on February 10, 2023. MGIC may prepay the Advance at any time. Such prepayment would be below par if interest rates have risen after the Advance was originated, or above par if interest rates have declined. The Advance is secured by eligible collateral whose fair value is maintained at a minimum of 102% of the outstanding principal balance. MGIC provided eligible collateral from its investment portfolio.

Capital Adequacy

PMIERs

We operate under the PMIERs of the GSEs that became effective December 31, 2015. The PMIERS were most recently revised in December 2016, but the revision had no impact on our calculation of Available Assets or

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 64~~

~~Table of contents~~

~~Minimum Required Assets, or on our operations. Refer to~~ ~~“Overview - Capital - GSEs”~~ ~~of this MD&A for further discussion of PMIERs.~~

As of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, MGIC’s Available Assets under PMIERs totaled approximately ~~$4.8~~$4.4 billion, an excess of approximately ~~$1.0~~$1.1 billion over its Minimum Required Assets; and MGIC is in compliance with the requirements of the PMIERs and eligible to insure loans delivered to or purchased by the GSEs. Maintaining a sufficient level of Available Assets will allow MGIC to remain in compliance with the PMIERs financial requirements, including, we believe, to the extent they are revised. Our ~~QSR Transactions~~reinsurance transactions provided an aggregate of approximately ~~$0.9~~$1.3 billion of PMIERs capital credit as of June 30, ~~2018.~~2019. Refer to Note 4 - “Reinsurance” to our consolidated financial statements for additional information on our QSR and Home Re Transactions.

We plan to continuously comply with the PMIERs through our operational activities or through the contribution of funds from our holding company, subject to demands on the holding company's resources, as outlined above. Refer to “Overview - Capital - GSEs” of this MD&A for further discussion of PMIERs.

Risk-to-capital

We compute our risk-to-capital ratio on a separate company statutory basis, as well as on a combined insurance operation basis. The risk-to-capital ratio is our net RIF divided by our policyholders’ position. Our net RIF includes both primary and pool risk in force, and excludes risk on policies that are currently in default and for which loss reserves have been established, and those covered by reinsurance. The risk amount includes pools of loans with contractual aggregate loss limits and without these limits. Policyholders’ position consists primarily of statutory policyholders’ surplus (which increases as a result of statutory net income and decreases as a result of statutory net loss and dividends paid), plus the statutory contingency reserve, and a portion of the reserves for unearned premiums. The statutory contingency reserve is reported as a liability on the statutory balance sheet. A mortgage insurance company is required to make annual additions to the contingency reserve of approximately 50% of net earned premiums. These contributions must generally be maintained for a period of ten years. However, with regulatory approval a mortgage insurance company may make early withdrawals from the contingency reserve when incurred losses exceed 35% of net earned premiums in a calendar year.

MGIC’s separate company risk-to-capital calculation is shown in the table below.



Risk-to-capital - MGIC separate company	(In millions, except ratio)	June 30, 2018		December 31, 2017		Risk-to-capital - MGIC separate company
	RIF - net ⁽¹⁾	$	32,559	$	31,144
	Statutory policyholders’ surplus	1,674		1,620
	Statutory contingency reserve	1,893		1,654
	Statutory policyholders’ position	$	3,567	$	3,274
	Risk-to-capital	9.1:1		9.5:1
(In millions, except ratio)						(In millions, except ratio)	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
RIF - net ⁽¹⁾						RIF - net ⁽¹⁾	$	43,391	$	34,502
Statutory policyholders’ surplus						Statutory policyholders’ surplus	1,633		1,682
Statutory contingency reserve						Statutory contingency reserve	2,670		2,138
Statutory policyholders’ position						Statutory policyholders’ position	$	4,303	$	3,820
Risk-to-capital						Risk-to-capital	10.1:1		9.0:1


⁽¹⁾	RIF – net, as shown in the table above is net of reinsurance and exposure on policies currently delinquent for which loss reserves have been established.

Our combined insurance companies’ risk-to-capital calculation ~~(which includes a reinsurance affiliate)~~ is shown in the table below. ~~Reinsurance transactions with our affiliate permit MGIC to write insurance with a higher coverage percentage than it could on its own under certain state-specific requirements.~~

Risk-to-capital - Combined insurance companies (In millions, except ratio) June 30, 2018 December 31, 2017
RIF - net ⁽¹⁾
$ 38,340
$ 36,818
Statutory policyholders’ surplus 1,676
1,622
Statutory contingency reserve 2,166
1,897
Statutory policyholders’ position $ 3,842
$ 3,519
Risk-to-capital 10.0:1
10.5:1

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 65~~

~~Table of contents~~



Risk-to-capital - Combined insurance companies
(In millions, except ratio)	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
RIF - net ⁽¹⁾	$	43,488	$	40,239
Statutory policyholders’ surplus	1,634		1,683
Statutory contingency reserve	2,729		2,443
Statutory policyholders’ position	$	4,363	$	4,126
Risk-to-capital	10.0:1		9.8:1


⁽¹⁾	RIF – net, as shown in the table above, is net of reinsurance and exposure on policies currently delinquent ($~~1.8~~2.1 billion at June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~$2.3~~$1.6 billion at December 31, ~~2017~~)2018) for which loss reserves have been established.

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2019 | 52

The ~~reductions~~increases in MGIC's and our combined insurance companies’ risk-to-capital in the first six months of ~~2018~~2019 were ~~primarily~~ due to an increase in our RIF, net of reinsurance, partially offset by an increase in statutory policyholders’ position due to an increase in statutory contingency ~~reserves, partially offset by an increase in net RIF in both calculations.~~reserves. Our RIF, net of reinsurance, increased in the first six months of ~~2018,~~2019, due to an increase in our ~~IIF.~~IIF and a reduction in our ceded RIF under our 2015 QSR Transaction. MGIC’s risk-to-capital ratio also increased due to the commutation of an affiliate reinsurance agreement. Our risk-to-capital ratio will ~~decrease~~increase if the percentage increase in ~~capital~~net insured risk exceeds the percentage increase in ~~insured risk.~~capital.

For additional information regarding regulatory capital see Note 1514 – “Statutory Information” to our consolidated financial statements as well as our risk factor titled “State Capital requirements may prevent us from continuing to write new insurance on an uninterrupted basis.”

Financial Strength Ratings




MGIC financial strength ratings
Rating Agency			Rating		Outlook
Moody’s Investor Services			Baa2		Stable
	Standard and Poor’s Rating Services			BBB+		Stable
A.M. Best		A-		Stable

For further information about the importance of MGIC’s ratings, see our risk factor titled “Competition or changes in our relationships with our customers could reduce our revenues, reduce our premium yields and / or increase our losses.”



MAC financial strength ratings
Rating Agency	Rating	Outlook
A.M. Best	A-	Stable

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 ~~2018~~2019 | 6653

~~Table of contents~~

Contractual Obligations

AtThe following table summarizes, as of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the approximate future payments under our contractual obligations ~~of the type described in the table below are as follows:~~and estimated claim payments on established loss reserves.



Contractual obligations		Payments due by period										Contractual obligations
	(In millions)	Total		Less than 1 year		1-3 years		3-5 years		More than 5 years
	Long-term debt obligations	$	2,026.6	$	51.3	$	101.6	$	254.9	$	1,618.8		Payments due by period
	Operating lease obligations	2.3		0.8		1.4		0.1		—
	Tax obligations	57.0		57.0		—		—		—
	Purchase obligations	11.0		10.2		0.8		—		—
	Pension, SERP and other post-retirement plans	326.1		29.8		65.9		67.0		163.4
	Other long-term liabilities	813.0		304.9		369.1		139.0		—
	Total	$	3,236.0	$	454.0	$	538.8	$	461.0	$	1,782.2
(In millions)												(In millions)	Total		Less than 1 year		1-3 years		3-5 years		More than 5 years
Long-term debt obligations												Long-term debt obligations	$	1,975.4	$	51.1	$	101.1	$	664.7	$	1,158.5
Operating lease obligations												Operating lease obligations	2.3		1.2		1.0		0.1		—
Purchase obligations												Purchase obligations	7.8		5.4		2.1		0.3		—
Other long-term liabilities												Other long-term liabilities	621.9		233.2		282.3		106.4		—
Total												Total	$	2,607.4	$	290.9	$	386.5	$	771.5	$	1,158.5

Our long-term debt obligations as of June 30, ~~2018~~2019 include their related interest and are discussed in Note 3 - “Debt” to our consolidated financial statements and under “Liquidity and Capital Resources” above. Our operating lease obligations include operating leases on certain office space, data processing equipment and autos, as discussed in Note 16 – “Leases” to our consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2017. Tax obligations primarily relate to our tax settlement with the IRS, as discussed in~~ ~~Note 11 – “Income Taxes.”~~2018. Purchase obligations consist primarily of agreements to purchase items related to our ~~ongoing infrastructure projects~~corporate headquarters update and continued investment in our information technology ~~investments~~infrastructure in the normal course of business. See Note 11 – “Benefit Plans” to our consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 for a discussion of expected benefit payments under our benefit plans.

Our other long-term liabilities represent the loss reserves established to recognize the liability for losses and LAE related to existing delinquencies on insured mortgage loans. The timing of the future claim payments associated with the established loss reserves was determined primarily based on two key assumptions: the length of time it takes for a notice of delinquency to develop into a received claim and the length of time it takes for a received claim to be ultimately paid. The future claim payment periods are estimated based on historical experience, and could emerge differently than this estimate, in part, due to uncertainty regarding the impact of certain factors, such as loss mitigation protocols established by servicers and changes in some state foreclosure laws that may include, for example, a requirement for additional review and/or mediation process.

See Note 1211 – “Loss Reserves” to our consolidated financial statements. In accordance with GAAP for the mortgage insurance industry, we establish loss reserves only for delinquent loans. Because our reserving method does not take account of the impact of future losses that could occur from loans that are not delinquent, our obligation for ultimate losses that we expect to occur under our policies in force at any period end is not reflected in our consolidated financial statements or in the table above.

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 ~~2018~~2019 | 6754

~~Table of contents~~

Forward Looking Statements and Risk Factors

General: Our business, results of operations, and financial condition could be affected by the risk factors referred to under “Location of Risk Factors” below. These risk factors are an integral part of Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

These factors may also cause actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by forward looking statements that we may make. Forward looking statements consist of statements which relate to matters other than historical fact. Among others, statements that include words such as we “believe,” “anticipate” or “expect,” or words of similar import, are forward looking statements. We are not undertaking any obligation to update any forward looking statements we may make even though these statements may be affected by events or circumstances occurring after the forward looking statements were made. Therefore no reader of this document should rely on these statements being current as of any time other than the time at which this document was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

While we communicate with security analysts from time to time, it is against our policy to disclose to them any material non-public information or other confidential information. Accordingly, investors should not assume that we agree with any statement or report issued by any analyst irrespective of the content of the statement or report, and such reports are not our responsibility.

Location of Risk Factors: The risk factors are in Item 1 A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, as supplemented by Part II, Item 1 A of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, and by Part II, Item ~~1 A~~1A of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The risk factors in the 10-K, as supplemented by ~~those~~this 10‑QsQ and through updating of various statistical and other information, are reproduced in Exhibit 99 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Our investment portfolio is essentially a fixed income portfolio and is exposed to market risk. Important drivers of the market risk are credit spread risk and interest rate risk.

Credit spread risk is the risk that we will incur a loss due to adverse changes in credit spreads. Credit spread is the additional yield on fixed income securities above the risk-free rate (typically referenced as the yield on U.S. Treasury securities) that market participants require to compensate them for assuming credit, liquidity and/or prepayment risks.

We manage credit risk via our investment policy guidelines which primarily place our investments in investment grade securities and limit the amount of our credit exposure to any one issue, issuer and type of instrument. Guideline and investment portfolio detail is available in "Business – Section C, Investment Portfolio" in Item 1 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2017.~~2018.

Interest rate risk is the risk that we will incur a loss due to adverse changes in interest rates relative to the characteristics of our interest bearing assets.

One of the measures used to quantify this exposure is modified duration. Modified duration measures the price sensitivity of the assets to the changes in spreads. At June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the modified duration of our fixed income investment portfolio was ~~4.2~~4.0 years, which means that an instantaneous parallel shift in the yield curve of 100 basis points would result in a change of ~~4.2%~~4.0% in the fair value of our fixed income portfolio. For an upward shift in the yield curve, the fair value of our portfolio would decrease and for a downward shift in the yield curve, the fair value would increase. See Note 7 – “Investments” to our consolidated financial statements for additional disclosure surrounding our investment portfolio.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended), as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on such evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that such controls and procedures were effective as of the end of such period. There was no change in our internal control over

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 68~~

~~Table of contents~~

financial reporting that occurred during the second quarter of ~~2018~~2019 that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 ~~2018~~2019 | 6955

~~Table of contents~~

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

In 2014, we received Notices of Deficiency (commonly referred to as “90 day letters”) from the IRS. We filed a petition with the U.S. Tax Court contesting most of the IRS’ proposed adjustments reflectedCertain legal proceedings arising in the ~~Notices~~ordinary course of ~~Deficiency. In July 2018, we finalized an agreement with~~business may be filed or pending against us from time to time. For information about such legal proceedings, you should review our risk factor titled “We are involved in legal proceedings and are subject to the ~~IRS to settle all issues~~risk of additional legal proceedings in the ~~examinations and related U.S. Tax Court case; the settlement was approved by the U.S. Tax Court on July 26, 2018. The expected impact of the agreed upon settlement was previously reflected~~future” in ~~our consolidated financial statements~~.Item 1A.

Item 1 A. Risk Factors

With the exception of the changes described and set forth below, there have been no material changes in our risk factors from the risk factors disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, as supplemented by Part II, Item I A of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended March 31, ~~2018.~~2019. The risk factors in the 10-K, as supplemented by that 10-Q and this 10-Q, and through updating of various statistical and other information, are reproduced in their entirety in Exhibit 99 to this Quarterly Report on Form ~~10-Q.~~

~~Competition or changes in our relationships with our customers could reduce our revenues, reduce our premium yields and / or increase our losses.~~

~~Our private mortgage insurance competitors include:~~

•~~Arch Mortgage Insurance Company,~~

•~~Essent Guaranty, Inc.,~~

•~~Genworth Mortgage Insurance Corporation,~~

•~~National Mortgage Insurance Corporation, and~~

•~~Radian Guaranty Inc.~~

The private mortgage insurance industry is highly competitive and is expected to remain so. We believe that we currently compete with other private mortgage insurers based on pricing, underwriting requirements, financial strength (including based on credit or financial strength ratings), customer relationships, name recognition, reputation, the strength of our management team and field organization, the ancillary products and services provided to lenders and the effective use of technology and innovation in the delivery and servicing of our mortgage insurance products.

Much of the competition in the industry in the last few years has centered on pricing practices which have included: (i) reductions in standard filed rates for borrower-paid mortgage insurance policies ("BPMI"); (ii) use by certain competitors of a spectrum of filed rates to allow for formulaic, risk-based pricing (commonly referred to as “black-box” pricing); and (iii) use of customized rates (discounted from published rates) that are made available to many, but not all, lenders. We changed our BPMI premium rates with effective dates in the second and third quarters of 2018. Based on the mix of our new primary insurance written ("NIW") in the first quarter of 2018, the changed premiums would have resulted in an overall direct premium rate decrease for all NIW in the first quarter of 2018 of approximately 8.5%. This premium rate decrease will affect our premium yield (net premiums earned divided by the average insurance in force) over time as older insurance policies with higher premium rates run off and new insurance policies with lower premium rates are written. The GSE

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 70~~

~~Table of contents~~

~~pilot programs discussed in our risk factor titled~~ ~~"The amount of insurance we write could be adversely affected if lenders and investors select alternatives to private mortgage insurance"~~ ~~could lead to further reductions in premium rates.~~

Our relationships with our customers could be adversely affected by a variety of factors, including if our premium rates are higher than those of our competitors, our underwriting requirements result in our declining to insure some of the loans originated by our customers, or our insurance policy rescissions and claim curtailments affect the customer. Regarding the concentration of our new business, our largest customer accounted for approximately 4% of our new insurance written in each of 2017 and the first half of 2018.

Certain of our competitors have access to capital at a lower cost of capital than we do (including, as a result of off-shore reinsurance vehicles, which are also tax-advantaged). As a result, they may be better positioned to compete outside of traditional mortgage insurance, including by participating in the pilot programs referred to above and other alternative forms of credit enhancement pursued by the GSEs. In addition, because of their tax advantages, certain competitors may be able to achieve higher after-tax rates of return on their NIW compared to us, which could allow them to leverage reduced pricing to gain market share.

Substantially all of our insurance written since 2008 has been for loans purchased by the GSEs. The current private mortgage insurer eligibility requirements ("PMIERs") of the GSEs require a mortgage insurer to maintain a minimum amount of assets to support its insured risk, as discussed in our risk factor titled “We may not continue to meet the GSEs’ private mortgage insurer eligibility requirements and our returns may decrease as we are required to maintain more capital in order to maintain our eligibility.” ~~The PMIERs do not require an insurer to maintain minimum financial strength ratings; however, our financial strength ratings can affect us in the following ways:~~

A downgrade in our financial strength ratings could result in increased scrutiny of our financial condition by the GSEs and/or our customers, potentially resulting in a decrease in the amount of our new insurance written.

Our ability to participate in the non-GSE mortgage market (which has been limited since 2008, but may grow in the future), could depend on our ability to maintain and improve our investment grade ratings for our mortgage insurance subsidiaries. We could be competitively disadvantaged with some market participants because the financial strength ratings of our insurance subsidiaries are lower than those of some competitors. MGIC's financial strength rating from Moody’s is ~~Baa2~~ ~~(with a~~ ~~stable~~ ~~outlook) and from Standard & Poor’s is~~ ~~BBB+~~ ~~(with a~~ ~~stable~~ ~~outlook).~~

Financial strength ratings may also play a greater role if the GSEs no longer operate in their current capacities, for example, due to legislative or regulatory action. In addition, although the PMIERs do not require minimum financial strength ratings, the GSEs consider financial strength ratings to be important when utilizing forms of credit enhancement other than traditional mortgage insurance, including the pilot programs referred to above, and as discussed in our risk factor titled ~~"The amount of insurance we write could be adversely affected if lenders and investors select alternatives to private mortgage insurance."~~

If we are unable to compete effectively in the current or any future markets as a result of the financial strength ratings assigned to our insurance subsidiaries, our future new insurance written could be negatively affected.10‑Q.

The amount of insurance we write could be adversely affected if lenders and investors select alternatives to private mortgage insurance.

Alternatives to private mortgage insurance include:

lenders using FHA, VA and other government mortgage insurance programs,

investors using risk mitigation and credit risk transfer techniques other than private mortgage insurance,

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 71~~

~~Table of contents~~

lenders and other investors holding mortgages in portfolio and self-insuring, and

lenders originating mortgages using piggyback structures to avoid private mortgage insurance, such as a first mortgage with an 80% loan-to-value ratio and a second mortgage with a 10%, 15% or 20% loan-to-value ratio (referred to as 80-10-10, 80-15-5 or 80-20 loans, respectively) rather than a first mortgage with a 90%, 95% or 100% loan-to-value ratio that has private mortgage insurance.

In ~~the first quarter of~~ 2018, Freddie Mac ~~began marketing a pilot program to lenders that would have~~and Fannie Mae initiated programs with loan level mortgage default coverage provided by various (re)insurers that are not mortgage insurers governed by PMIERs, and that are not selected by the lenders. ~~We view the pilot program as competing~~These programs compete with traditional private mortgage ~~insurance. The pilot offers pricing~~insurance and, due to differences in policy terms, they may offer premium rates that are below prevalent single premium lender paid mortgage insurance ("LPMI") rates. ~~In July 2018, Fannie Mae announced~~We participate in these programs from time to time. See our risk factor titled “Changes in the business practices of the GSEs, federal legislation that changes their charters or a ~~similar pilot program~~restructuring of the GSEs could reduce our revenues or increase our losses” for a discussion of various business practices of the GSEs that ~~would have loan level mortgage default coverage provided by a panel~~may be changed, including through expansion or modification of ~~reinsurers (which may include affiliates of private mortgage insurers).~~these programs.

The GSEs (and other investors) have also used other forms of credit enhancement that did not involve traditional private mortgage insurance, such as engaging in credit-linked note transactions executed in the capital markets, or using other forms of debt issuances or securitizations that transfer credit risk directly to other ~~investors;~~investors, including competitors and an affiliate of MGIC; using other risk mitigation techniques in conjunction with reduced levels of private mortgage insurance coverage; or accepting credit risk without credit enhancement.

The FHA's share of the low down payment residential mortgages that were subject to FHA, VA, USDA or primary private mortgage insurance was ~~33.9%~~31.1% in the first quarter of 2019, 30.5% in 2018 ~~35.6%~~and 33.9% in ~~2017 and 35.5% in 2016.~~2017. In the past ten years, the FHA’s share has been as low as ~~32.4%~~30.5% in ~~2014~~2018 and as high as ~~68.7%~~66.8% in 2009. Factors that influence the FHA’s market share include relative rates and fees, underwriting guidelines and loan limits of the FHA, VA, private mortgage insurers and the GSEs; lenders' perceptions of legal risks under FHA versus GSE programs; flexibility for the FHA to establish new products as a result of federal legislation and programs; returns expected to be obtained by lenders for Ginnie Mae securitization of FHA-insured loans compared to those obtained from selling loans to ~~Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac~~the GSEs for securitization; and differences in policy terms, such as the ability of a borrower to cancel insurance coverage under certain circumstances. We cannot predict how the factors that affect the FHA’s share of new insurance written will change in the future.

The VA's share of the low down payment residential mortgages that were subject to FHA, VA, USDA or primary private mortgage insurance was ~~25.5%~~23.4% in the first quarter of 2019, 22.9% in 2018 ~~24.1%~~and 24.7% in ~~2017 and 26.6% in 2016.~~2017. In the past ten years, the VA’s share has been as low as ~~8.2%~~14.3% in ~~2008~~2009 and as high as ~~26.6%~~27.2% in 2016. We believe that the VA’s market share has generally been ~~increasing~~elevated in recent years because of an increase in the number of borrowers that are eligible for the VA’s program, which offers 100% loan-to-value ratio ("LTV") loans and charges a one-time funding fee that can be included in the loan amount, and because eligible borrowers have opted to use the VA program when refinancing their mortgages.

Changes in the business practices of the GSEs, federal legislation that changes their charters or a restructuring of the GSEs could reduce our revenues or increase our losses.

The GSEs’ charters generally require credit enhancement for a low down payment mortgage loan (a loan with an amount that exceeds 80% of a home’s value) in order for such loan to be eligible for purchase by the GSEs. Lenders generally have used private mortgage insurance to satisfy this credit enhancement requirement. (For information about GSE ~~pilot~~ programs initiated in 2018 that provide loan level default coverage by various (re)insurers (which may include affiliates of private mortgage insurers), see our risk factor titled "The amount of insurance we write could be adversely affected if lenders and investors select alternatives to private mortgage insurance.") Because low down payment mortgages purchased by the GSEs have generally been insured with private mortgage insurance, the business practices of the GSEs greatly impact our business and include:

~~private mortgage insurer eligibility requirements of the GSEs (for information about the financial requirements included in the PMIERs, see our risk factor titled~~ “We may not continue to meet the GSEs’ private mortgage insurer eligibility requirements and our returns may decrease as we are required to maintain more capital in order to maintain our eligibility”),

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 ~~2018~~2019 | 7256

~~Table of contents~~

~~the capital and collateral requirements for participants in the GSEs' alternative forms of credit enhancement discussed in our risk factor titled~~ ~~"The amount of insurance we write could be adversely affected if lenders and investors select alternatives to private mortgage insurance,"~~


•	private mortgage insurer eligibility requirements of the GSEs, the financial requirements of which are discussed in our risk factor titled “We may not continue to meet the GSEs’ private mortgage insurer eligibility requirements and our returns may decrease as we are required to maintain more capital in order to maintain our eligibility,”


•	the capital and collateral requirements for participants in the GSEs' alternative forms of credit enhancement discussed in our risk factor titled "The amount of insurance we write could be adversely affected if lenders and investors select alternatives to private mortgage insurance,"

the level of private mortgage insurance coverage, subject to the limitations of the GSEs’ charters, ~~(which may be changed by federal legislation),~~ when private mortgage insurance is used as the required credit enhancement on low down payment mortgages,

the amount of loan level price adjustments and guaranty fees (which result in higher costs to borrowers) that the GSEs assess on loans that require private mortgage insurance,

whether the GSEs select or influence the mortgage lender’s selection of the mortgage insurer providing coverage, ~~and, if so, any transactions that are related to that selection,~~

the underwriting standards that determine which loans are eligible for purchase by the GSEs, which can affect the quality of the risk insured by the mortgage insurer and the availability of mortgage loans,

the terms on which mortgage insurance coverage can be canceled before reaching the cancellation thresholds established by law,

the programs established by the GSEs intended to avoid or mitigate loss on insured mortgages and the circumstances in which mortgage servicers must implement such programs,

the terms that the GSEs require to be included in mortgage insurance policies for loans that they purchase,

including limitations on the ~~terms on which the GSEs offer lenders relief on their representations and warranties made at the time~~rescission rights of ~~sale of a loan to the GSEs, which creates pressure on~~ mortgage insurers, to limit their rescission rights to conform to such relief, and the extent to which the GSEs intervene in mortgage insurers’ claims paying practices, rescission practices or rescission settlement practices with lenders,~~and~~


•	the extent to which the GSEs intervene in mortgage insurers’ claims paying practices, rescission practices or rescission settlement practices with lenders,and

the maximum loan limits of the GSEs compared to those of the FHA and other investors.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”) has been the conservator of the GSEs since 2008 and has the authority to control and direct their operations. The increased role that the federal government has assumed in the residential housing finance system through the GSE conservatorship may increase the likelihood that the business practices of the GSEs change, including through administrative action, in ways that have a material adverse effect on us and that the charters of the GSEs are changed by new federal legislation. In the past, members of Congress have introduced several bills intended to change the

business practices of the GSEs and the FHA; however, no legislation has been enacted.

We may insure loans that do not qualify as QMs, however, we are unsure the extent to ~~fully private entities, competing on a level playing field with private issuers of mortgage-backed securities ("MBS") (such issuers, collectively~~which lenders will make non-QM loans because they will not be entitled to the presumptions about compliance with the ~~GSEs, referred~~“ability to inrepay” rules that the ~~report as~~law allows with respect to QM loans. We are also unsure the ~~"guarantors").~~ extent to which lenders will purchase private mortgage insurance for loans that cannot be sold to the GSEs.

The ~~report further indicated~~rule that ~~a federal entity should regulate~~includes the ~~guarantors, including their capital adequacy, and~~QM definition that ~~guarantors should have access~~applies to ~~an explicit federal guarantee on the MBS that is only exposed after substantial losses are incurred~~loans insured by the ~~private market, including the guarantors. The report also indicated that a fee on the outstanding volume of MBS would be transferred to~~FHA was issued by the Department of Housing and Urban Development ~~(of which~~(“HUD”) and that definition is less restrictive than the CFPB’s definition in certain respects, including that (i) it has no DTI ratio limit, and (ii) it allows the lender certain presumptions about compliance with the “ability to repay” requirements on higher priced loans. It is possible that lenders will prefer FHA-insured loans to loans insured by private mortgage insurance as a result of the FHA’s less restrictive QM definition.

In March 2019, the President also directed the Secretary of HUD to develop a plan that would recommend administrative and legislative reforms to the programs HUD oversees, including

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2019 | 57

those of the FHA ~~is a part) to be used for affordable housing purposes.~~and the Government National Mortgage Association. As a result of the matters referred to above, it is uncertain what role the GSEs, FHA and private capital, including private mortgage insurance, will play in the residential housing finance system in the ~~future or the~~future. The timing and impact ~~of any such changes~~ on our ~~business. In addition, the timing of the impact~~business of any resulting changes ~~on our business~~ is uncertain. Most meaningful changes would require Congressional action to implement and it is difficult to estimate when Congressional action would be final and how long any associated phase-in period may last.

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 73~~

~~Table of contents~~

We ~~may not continue to meet the GSEs’ private mortgage insurer eligibility requirements and our returns may decrease as we~~ are ~~required to maintain more capital~~involved in ~~order to maintain our eligibility.~~

We must comply with the PMIERs to be eligible to insure loans purchased by the GSEs. The PMIERs include financial requirements, as well as business, quality control and certain transaction approval requirements. The financial requirements of the PMIERs require a mortgage insurer’s “Available Assets” (generally only the most liquid assets of an insurer) to equal or exceed its “Minimum Required Assets” (which are based on an insurer’s book of insurance in force and are calculated from tables of factors with several risk dimensionslegal proceedings and are subject to ~~a floor amount). Based on our interpretation~~the risk of additional legal proceedings in the future.

Before paying an insurance claim, we review the loan and servicing files to determine the appropriateness of the ~~PMIERs,~~claim amount. When reviewing the files, we may determine that we have the right to rescind coverage on the loan. In our SEC reports, we refer to insurance rescissions and denials of claims collectively as “rescissions” and variations of ~~June 30,~~that term. In addition, our insurance policies generally provide that we can reduce or deny a claim if the servicer did not comply with its obligations under our insurance policy. We call such reduction of claims “curtailments.” In recent quarters, an immaterial percentage of claims received in a quarter have been resolved by rescissions. In 2018 ~~MGIC’s Available Assets totaled $4.8 billion, or $1.0 billion in excess~~and the first half of ~~its Minimum Required Assets. MGIC is in compliance with the PMIERs~~2019, curtailments reduced our average claim paid by approximately 5.8% and ~~eligible to insure loans purchased by the GSEs.~~4.7%, respectively.

~~If MGIC ceases to be eligible to insure loans purchased by one or both~~Our loss reserving methodology incorporates our estimates of future rescissions, curtailments, and reversals of rescissions and curtailments. A variance between ultimate actual rescission, curtailment and reversal rates and our estimates, as a result of the ~~GSEs, it would significantly reduce~~outcome of litigation, settlements or other factors, could materially affect our losses.

When the ~~volume~~insured disputes our right to rescind coverage or curtail claims, we generally engage in discussions in an attempt to settle the dispute. If we are unable to reach a settlement, the outcome of a dispute ultimately may be determined by legal proceedings.

Under ASC 450-20, until a liability associated with settlement discussions or legal proceedings becomes probable and can be reasonably estimated, we consider our claim payment or rescission resolved for financial reporting purposes and do not accrue an estimated loss. Where we have determined that a loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated, we have recorded our best estimate of our ~~new business writings. Factors that may negatively impact MGIC’s ability to continue to comply with the financial requirements~~probable loss, including recording a probable loss of ~~the PMIERs include the following:~~

~~In December 2017, we received from the GSEs a summary of proposed changes to the PMIERs. In June 2018, we received a revised draft of proposed changes to the PMIERs that we expect will be finalized~~$23.5 million in ~~the third quarter of 2018 and become effective at the end of~~ the first quarter of ~~2019 (the revised PMIERs~~2019. Until settlement negotiations or legal proceedings for which we have recorded a probable loss are ~~referred~~concluded, it is reasonably possible that we will record an additional loss. In addition to ~~as "PMIERs 2.0"). Upon effectiveness~~matters for which we have recorded a probable loss, we are involved in other discussions and/or proceedings with insureds with respect to our claims paying practices. Although it is reasonably possible that when all of ~~PMIERs 2.0,~~these matters are resolved we ~~expect that MGIC would continue~~will not prevail in all cases, we are unable to ~~have an excess~~make a reasonable estimate or range of ~~Available Assets over Minimum Required Assets ("PMIERs Excess"), although our PMIERs Excess would be materially lower than it was at June 30, 2018 under~~estimates of the ~~existing PMIERs, and that MGIC would continue~~potential liability. We estimate the maximum exposure associated with matters where a loss is reasonably possible to be ~~able to pay quarterly dividends to our holding company of at least the $50~~approximately $289 million ~~quarterly rate at which they were paid in the first and second quarters of 2018.~~

~~We have non-disclosure obligations to each of the GSEs and cannot provide further comment on the draft of PMIERs 2.0, other~~more than ~~as described above. Until the GSEs and/or FHFA provide public disclosure of the final version of PMIERs 2.0, we do not plan to update or correct any of the disclosures above.~~

Our future operating results may be negatively impacted by the matters discussed in the rest of these risk factors. Such matters could decrease our revenues, increase our losses or require the use of assets, thereby creating a shortfall in Available Assets.

~~While on an overall basis,~~ the amount of ~~Available Assets MGIC must hold~~probable loss we have recorded. This estimate of maximum exposure is based upon currently available information and is subject to significant judgment, numerous assumptions and

known and unknown uncertainties, and will include an amount for matters for which we have recorded a probable loss until such matters are concluded. We do not consider settlements concluded until any required GSE approval for such settlements is obtained. On August 2, 2019, we entered into an agreement to settle a claims paying practices dispute for which we previously had recognized a probable loss. There was no additional loss recognized as a result of entering into the agreement, as the settlement amount is in ~~order to continue to insure GSE loans is greater under the PMIERs than what state regulation currently requires,~~line with our ~~reinsurance transactions mitigate the negative effect~~original estimate of the ~~PMIERs~~probable loss. The agreement remains subject to GSE approval. The matters underlying the estimate of maximum exposure will change from time to time. This estimate of our maximum exposure does not include interest or consequential or exemplary damages.

Mortgage insurers, including MGIC, have been involved in litigation and regulatory actions related to alleged violations of the anti-referral fee provisions of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, which is commonly known as RESPA, and the notice provisions of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, which is commonly known as FCRA. While these proceedings in the aggregate have not resulted in material liability for MGIC, there can be no assurance that the outcome of future proceedings, if any, under these laws would not have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, various regulators, including the CFPB, state insurance commissioners and state attorneys general may bring other actions seeking various forms of relief in connection with alleged violations of RESPA. The insurance law provisions of many states prohibit paying for the referral of insurance business and provide various mechanisms to enforce this prohibition. While we believe our practices are in conformity with applicable laws and regulations, it is not possible to predict the eventual scope, duration or outcome of any such reviews or investigations nor is it possible to predict their effect on us or the mortgage insurance industry.

In addition to the matters described above, we are involved in other legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business. In our opinion, based on the facts known at this time, the ultimate resolution of these ordinary course legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our ~~returns. In this regard, see the first bullet point above. In addition, reinsurance may not always be available to us~~financial position or ~~available on similar terms, and it subjects us to counterparty credit risk.~~

In June 2018, the FHFA issued a proposed rule on regulatory capital requirements for the GSEs ("GSE Capital Requirements"), which included a framework for determining the capital relief allowed to the GSEs for loans with private mortgage insurance. The FHFA noted that the GSEs would not be subject to the GSE Capital Requirements during their conservatorship.

~~The benefit~~results of ~~our net operating loss carryforwards may become substantially limited.~~

As of June 30, 2018, we had approximately $344.0 million of net operating losses for tax purposes that we can use in certain circumstances to offset future taxable income and thus reduce our federal income tax liability. Any unutilized carryforwards are scheduled to expire at the end of tax years 2032 through 2033. Our ability to utilize these net operating losses to offset future taxable income may be significantly limited if we experience an “ownership change” as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 74~~

~~Table of contents~~

amended (the “Code”). In general, an ownership change will occur if there is a cumulative change in our ownership by “5-percent shareholders” (as defined in the Code) that exceeds 50 percentage points over a rolling three-year period. A corporation that experiences an ownership change will generally be subject to an annual limitation on the corporation’s subsequent use of net operating loss carryovers that arose from pre-ownership change periods and use of losses that are subsequently recognized with respect to assets that had a built-in-loss on the date of the ownership change. The amount of the annual limitation generally equals the fair value of the corporation immediately before the ownership change multiplied by the long-term tax-exempt interest rate (subject to certain adjustments). To the extent that the limitation in a post-ownership-change year is not fully utilized, the amount of the limitation for the succeeding year will be increased.

While we have adopted our Amended and Restated Rights Agreement to minimize the likelihood of transactions in our stock resulting in an ownership change, future issuances of equity-linked securities or transactions in our stock and equity-linked securities that may not be within our control may cause us to experience an ownership change. If we experience an ownership change, we may not be able to fully utilize our net operating losses, resulting in additional income taxes and a reduction in our shareholders’ equity.operations.

The mix of business we write affects our Minimum Required Assets under the PMIERs, our premium yields and the likelihood of losses occurring.

The Minimum Required Assets under the PMIERs are, in part, a function of the direct risk-in-force and the risk profile of the loans we insure, considering loan-to-value ratio, credit score, vintage, Home Affordable Refinance Program ("HARP") status and delinquency status; and whether the loans were insured under lender-paid mortgage insurance policies or other policies that are not subject to automatic termination consistent with the Homeowners Protection Act requirements for borrower paid mortgage insurance. Therefore, if our direct risk-in-force increases through increases in new insurance written, or if our mix of business changes to include loans with higher loan-to-value ratios or lower FICO scores, for example, or if we insure a higher percentage of loans under lender-paid mortgage insurance policies, all other things equal, we will be required to hold more Available Assets in order to maintain GSE eligibility.

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2019 | 58

The minimum capital required by the risk-based capital framework contained in the exposure draft released by the NAIC in May 2016 would be, in part, a function of certain loan and economic factors, including property location, loan-to-value ratio and credit score; general underwriting quality in the market at the time of loan origination; the age of the loan; and the premium rate we charge. Depending on the provisions of the capital requirements when they are released in final form and become effective, our mix of business may affect the minimum capital we are required to hold under the new framework.

The percentage of our ~~new insurance written~~NIW from all single-premium policies (LPMI and BPMI, combined) has ~~generally been increasing over the past several years,~~ranged from approximately 10% in 2013 to 19% in 2017 and was 17% in 2018 and 16% in the first ~~six months~~half of ~~2018.~~2019. Depending on the actual life of a single premium policy and its premium rate relative to that of a monthly premium policy, a single premium policy may generate more or less premium than a monthly premium policy over its life.

We have in place quota share reinsurance ("QSR") transactions with ~~a group of~~ unaffiliated reinsurers that cover most of our insurance written from 2013 through ~~2018,~~2019, and a portion of our insurance written prior to 2013. Although the transactions reduce our premiums, they have a lesser impact on our overall results, as losses ceded under the transactions reduce our losses incurred and the ceding commissions we receive reduce our underwriting expenses. The blended pre-tax cost of reinsurance under our different transactions is less than 6% (but will decrease if losses are materially higher than we expect). This blended pre-tax cost is derived by dividing the reduction in our pre-tax income on loans covered by reinsurance by our direct (that is, without reinsurance) premiums from such loans. Although the pre-tax cost of the reinsurance under each transaction is generally constant, the effect of the ~~reinsurance~~QSR transactions on the various components of pre-tax income will vary from period to period, depending on the level of ceded losses. ~~Although the GSEs have approved the terms~~

In 2018 and 2019, MGIC entered into reinsurance agreements that provide excess-of-loss reinsurance coverage for a portion of ~~our QSR transactions, they will be reviewed under the PMIERs at least annually. We may not receive full credit under the PMIERs in future periods for~~ the risk ~~ceded under our QSR transactions.~~

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 75~~

~~Table of contents~~

associated with certain mortgage insurance policies having an insurance coverage in force date on or after July 1, 2016 and before April 1, 2019. The transactions were entered into with special purpose insurers that issued notes linked to the reinsurance coverage ("Insurance Linked Notes" or "ILNs"). We expect that we may enter into other ILN transactions if capital market conditions remain favorable.

In addition to the effect of reinsurance on our premiums, we expect a decline in our premium yield ~~resulting from the premium rates themselves. An~~because an increasing percentage of our insurance in force is from recent book years ~~with lower premium rates because~~whose premium rates have ~~trended lower in recent periods (and will continue to do so after the 2018 changes to our BPMI premium rates).~~been trending lower.

~~The circumstances in which we are entitled~~Our ability to rescind insurance coverage ~~have narrowed~~became more limited for insurance we ~~have written~~wrote beginning in ~~recent years. During the second quarter of 2012, we began writing a portion of our new insurance under an endorsement to our then existing master policy (the “Gold Cert Endorsement”),~~mid-2012, which, limited our ability to rescind coverage compared to that master policy. To comply with requirements of the GSEs, we introduced our current master policy in 2014. Our rescission rights under our current master policy are comparable to those under our previous master policy, as modified by the Gold Cert Endorsement, but may be further narrowed if the GSEs permit modifications to them. Our current master policy is filed as Exhibit 99.19 to our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014 (filed with the SEC on November 7, 2014). All of our primary new insurance on loans with mortgage insurance application dates on or after October 1, 2014, was written under our current master policy. As of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, represents approximately ~~78%~~84% of our flow, primary insurance in ~~force was written under~~force. As a result of revised PMIERs requirements, we have revised our ~~Gold Cert Endorsement or our current~~ master ~~policy. The FHFA~~policy and ~~the GSEs have issued revised GSE rescission relief principles~~expect it to among other things, further limit the circumstances under which mortgage insurers may rescind coverage. It has been proposed that these principles be incorporated into new master policies which the GSEs have indicated should be effective for new ~~business~~insurance written ~~in 2019,~~beginning March 1, 2020, subject to state regulatory approvals. ~~These proposed principles are likely to further reduce our~~Our ability to rescind insurance coverage inwill become further limited for insurance we write under the ~~future,~~new master policy, potentially resulting in higher losses than would be the case under our existing master ~~insurance~~ policies.

From time to time, in response to market conditions, we change the types of loans that we insure and the requirements under which we insure them. We also change our underwriting guidelines, in part through aligning ~~some~~most of them with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for loans that receive and are processed in accordance with certain approval recommendations from a GSE automated underwriting system. We also make exceptions

to our underwriting requirements on a loan-by-loan basis and for certain customer programs. As a result of changes to our underwriting guidelines and requirements (including those related to debt to income ("DTI") ratios, credit scores, and the manner in which income levels and property values are determined) and other factors, our business written beginning in the second half of 2013 is expected to have a somewhat higher claim incidence than business written in 2009 through the first half of 2013, but materially below that on business written in 2005-2008. However, we believe this business presents an acceptable level of risk. Our underwriting requirements are available on our website at http://www.mgic.com/underwriting/index.html.

Even when home prices are stable or rising, mortgages with certain characteristics have higher probabilities of claims. These characteristics include higher LTV ratios, lower FICO scores, limited underwriting, including limited borrower documentation, or higher DTI ratios, as well as loans having combinations of higher risk factors. As of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, mortgages with these characteristics in our primary risk in force included mortgages with LTV ratios greater than 95% ~~(14.1%~~(15.4%), loans with borrowers having FICO scores below 620 ~~(2.7%~~(2.1%), mortgages with borrowers having FICO scores of 620-679 ~~(10.9%~~(9.9%), mortgages with limited underwriting, including limited borrower documentation ~~(2.5%~~(1.9%), and mortgages with borrowers having DTI ratios greater than 45% (or where no ratio is available) ~~(13.4%~~(14.6%), each attribute as determined at the time of loan origination. An individual loan may have more than one of these attributes. ~~A material number~~

Beginning in 2017, the percentage of these loans were originated in 2005 - 2007 or the first half of 2008. For information about our classification of loans by FICO score and documentation, see footnotes (5) and (6) to the Characteristics of Primary Risk in Force table under “Business - Our Products and Services” in Item 1 of our Annual ReportNIW that we have written on ~~Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 23, 2018.~~

As of June 30, 2018, approximately 1% of our primary risk in force consisted of adjustable rate mortgages which allow for adjustment of the initial interest rate during the five years after the mortgage closing (“ARMs”). We classify as fixed rate loans adjustable rate mortgages with ~~an initial interest rate~~LTV ratios greater than 95% and mortgages with DTI ratios greater than 45% has increased. In 2018, we started considering DTI ratios when setting our premium rates, and we changed our methodology for calculating DTI ratios for pricing and eligibility purposes to exclude the impact of mortgage insurance premiums. As a result of this change, loan originators may have changed the information they provide to us. Although we have changed our operational procedures to account for this, we cannot be sure that ~~is fixed during~~ the ~~five years after~~DTI ratio we report for each loan beginning in late 2018 includes the related mortgage ~~closing and loans with temporary interest rate adjustments during~~insurance premiums in the initial five years, commonly referred to as "buydowns," that convert to a fixed rate for the duration of the loan term. If interest rates should rise between the time of origination of such loans and when their interest rates may be reset, claim rates on such loans may be substantially higher than for loans without variable interest rate

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 76~~

~~Table of contents~~

~~features.~~calculation. In addition, ~~prior~~we expect to ~~2011,~~insure certain loans that would not have previously met our guidelines and to offer premium rates for certain loans lower than would have been offered under our previous methodology.

The widespread use of loan level pricing systems by the private mortgage insurance industry (discussed in our risk factor titled "Competition or changes in our relationships with our customers could reduce our revenues, reduce our premium yields and / or increase our losses") will make it more difficult to compare our premium rates to those offered by our competitors. We may not be aware of industry rate changes until we ~~insured “interest-only” loans, which~~observe that our mix of new insurance written has changed and our mix may ~~also be ARMs, and loans with negative amortization features, such~~fluctuate more as ~~pay option ARMs. We believe claim rates on these loans will be substantially higher than on loans without scheduled payment increases that are made to borrowers of comparable credit quality.~~a result.

If state or federal regulations or statutes are changed in ways that ease mortgage lending standards and/or requirements, or if lenders seek ways to replace business in times of lower mortgage originations, it is possible that more mortgage loans could be originated with higher risk characteristics than are currently being originated, such as loans with lower FICO scores and higher DTIs. Lenders could pressure mortgage insurers to insure such loans, which are expected to experience higher claim rates. Although we attempt to incorporate these higher expected claim rates into our underwriting and pricing models, there can be no assurance that the premiums earned and the associated investment income will be adequate to compensate for actual losses even under our current underwriting requirements. We do, however, believe that our insurance written beginning in the second half of 2008 will generate underwriting profits.

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2019 | 59

Our holding company debt obligations materially exceed our holding company cash and investments.

At June ~~30, 2018,~~30,2019, we had approximately ~~$191~~$333 million in cash and investments at our holding company and our holding company’s debt obligations were $815 million in aggregate principal amount, consisting of $425 million of 5.75% Senior Notes due in 2023 ("5.75% Notes") and $390 million of 9% Debentures (of which approximately $133 million was purchased, and is held, by MGIC, and is eliminated on the consolidated balance sheet). Annual debt service on the 5.75% Notes and 9% Debentures outstanding as of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, is approximately $60 million (of which approximately $12 million will be paid to MGIC and will be eliminated on the consolidated statement of operations).

The 5.75% Senior Notes and 9% Debentures are obligations of our holding company, MGIC Investment Corporation, and not of its subsidiaries. The payment of dividends from our insurance subsidiaries which, other than investment income and raising capital in the public markets, is the principal source of our holding company cash inflow, is restricted by insurance regulation. MGIC is the principal source of ~~dividend-paying capacity. In~~dividends, and in the first half of ~~2018~~2019 and in ~~2017, MGIC~~2018, it paid a total of ~~$100~~$140 million and ~~$140~~$220 million, respectively, in dividends to our holding company. We expect MGIC to continue to pay quarterly dividends of at least the ~~$50~~$70 million amount paid in ~~each~~the second quarter of ~~the first two quarters~~2019, subject to approval by its Board of ~~2018.~~Directors. We ask the OCI not to object before MGIC pays dividends.

~~On April 26,~~In the second quarter of 2019 and in 2018, we repurchased approximately 1.8 million and 16.0 million shares of our ~~Board~~common stock, respectively, using approximately $25 million and $175 million of ~~Directors authorized a share repurchase program under which~~holding company resources, respectively. Since the end of the second quarter, through August 5, 2019, we repurchased approximately 1.8 million shares for approximately $23 million. We may repurchase up to ~~$200~~an additional $177 million of our common stock through the end of ~~2019. During~~2020 under a share repurchase program approved by our Board of Directors in the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2018, we repurchased approximately 9.2 million shares of our common stock using approximately $100.1 million of holding company resources.~~2019. Repurchases may be made from time to time on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. The repurchase program may be suspended for periods or discontinued at any time. If any additional capital contributions to our subsidiaries were required, such contributions would decrease our holding company cash and investments. As described in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 11, 2016, MGIC borrowed $155 million from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago. This is an obligation of MGIC and not of our holding company.

~~Our~~The price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly, which may make it difficult for holders to resell common stock when they want or at a price they find attractive.

The market price for our common stock may fluctuate significantly. In addition to the risk factors described herein, the following factors may have an adverse impact on the market price for our common stock: announcements by us or our competitors of acquisitions or strategic initiatives; our actual or anticipated quarterly and annual operating results; changes in expectations of future financial ~~results may be adversely impacted by natural disasters; certain 2017 hurricanes may impact our~~performance (including incurred losses on our insurance in force); changes in estimates of securities analysts or rating agencies; actual or anticipated

changes in our share repurchase program or dividends; changes in general conditions in the ~~amount~~economy, the mortgage insurance industry or the financial markets; changes in operating performance or market valuation of companies in the mortgage insurance industry; the addition or departure of key personnel; changes in tax law; and ~~timing~~adverse press or news announcements affecting us or the industry. In addition, ownership by certain types of ~~paid claims,~~investors may affect the market price and trading volume of our ~~inventory of notices of default and~~common stock. For example, ownership in our ~~Minimum Required Assets under PMIERs.~~

~~Natural disasters,~~common stock by investors such as ~~hurricanes, tornadoes~~index funds and ~~floods, could trigger~~exchange-traded funds can affect the stock’s price when those investors must purchase or sell our common stock because the investors have experienced significant cash inflows or outflows, the index to which our common stock belongs has been rebalanced, or our common stock is added to and/or removed from an ~~economic downturn in the affected areas, which could result in a decline~~index (due to changes in our business and an increased claim rate on policies in those areas. Natural disasters could lead to a decrease in home prices in the affected areas, which could result in an increase in claim severity on policies in those areas. If we were to attempt to limit our new insurance written in disaster-prone areas, lenders may be unwilling to procure insurance from us anywhere.market capitalization, for example).

Natural disasters could also lead to increased reinsurance prices or reduced availability of reinsurance. This may cause us to retain more risk than we otherwise would retain and could negatively affect our compliance with the financial requirements of the PMIERs.

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 ~~2018~~2019 | 77

~~Table of contents~~

We insure mortgages for homes in areas that have been impacted by recent natural disasters, including 2017 hurricanes in Texas, Florida and Puerto Rico. While the percentage of our delinquency inventory that is related to loans in the areas affected by those hurricanes remains somewhat elevated, based on our analysis and past experience, we do not expect the 2017 hurricane activity to result in a material increase in our incurred losses or paid claims. However, the following factors could cause our actual results to differ from our expectation in the forward looking statement in the preceding sentence:

~~Home values in hurricane-affected areas may decrease at the time claims are filed from their current levels thereby adversely affecting our ability to mitigate loss.~~

Hurricane-affected areas may experience deteriorating economic conditions resulting in more borrowers defaulting on their loans in the future (or failing to cure existing defaults) than we currently expect.

If an insured contests our claim denial or curtailment, there can be no assurance we will prevail. We describe how claims under our policy are affected by damage to the borrower’s home in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 14, 2017.

~~Due to the suspension of certain foreclosures by the GSEs, our receipt of claims associated with foreclosed mortgages in the hurricane-affected areas may be delayed.~~

The PMIERs require us to maintain significantly more "Minimum Required Assets" for delinquent loans than for performing loans. An increase in delinquency notices may result in an increase in "Minimum Required Assets" and a decrease in the level of our excess "Available Assets" which is discussed in our risk factor titled ~~"We may not continue to meet the GSEs’ private mortgage insurer eligibility requirements and our returns may decrease as we are required to maintain more capital in order to maintain our eligibility~~."

~~MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 2018 | 78~~60

~~Table of contents~~

Item 2. Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The following table provides information about purchases of MGIC Investment Corporation common stock by us during the three months ended June 30, ~~2018.~~2019.

Share repurchases Period Beginning Period Ending Total number of shares purchased Average price paid per share Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs Approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the program
April 1, 2018 April 30, 2018 —
$ —
—
$ —
May 1, 2018 May 31, 2018 4,364,303
$ 10.66
4,364,303
$ 153,476,530
June 1, 2018 June 30, 2018 4,833,574
$ 11.08
4,833,574
$ 99,942,441
9,197,877
$ 10.88
9,197,877



Share repurchases
Period Beginning	Period Ending	Total number of shares purchased	Average price paid per share		Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs	Approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the programs ⁽¹⁾
April 1, 2019	April 30, 2019	—	$	—	—	$	224,940,973
May 1, 2019	May 31, 2019	—	$	—	—	$	224,940.973
June 1, 2019	June 30, 2019	1,808,739	$	13.79	1,808,739	$	200,000,000
		1,808,739	$	13.79	1,808,739

⁽¹⁾

The share repurchase activity completed the $200 million share repurchase program authorized by the Board of Directors on April 26, 2018. On March 19, 2019, our Board of Directors authorized an additional share repurchase program under which we may repurchase up to $200 million of our common stock through the end of 2020. Repurchases may be made from time to time on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. The repurchase program may be suspended for periods or discontinued at any time.

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 ~~2018~~2019 | 7961

~~Table of contents~~

Item 6. Exhibits

The accompanying Index to Exhibits is incorporated by reference in answer to this portion of this Item, and except as otherwise indicated in the next sentence, the Exhibits listed in such Index are filed as part of this Form 10-Q. Exhibit 32 is not filed as part of this Form 10-Q but accompanies this Form 10-Q.

(Part II, Item 6)

Index to exhibits





	Exhibit Number		Description of Exhibit
	1210.18		~~Ratio~~Separation Agreement between Stephen Mackey and Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corporation dated as of ~~Earnings to Fixed Charges~~May 14, 2019 *, †
	31.1		Certification of CEO under Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 †
	31.2		Certification of CFO under Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 †
	32		Certification of CEO and CFO under Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (as indicated in Item 6 of Part II, this Exhibit is not being “filed”) ††
	99		Risk Factors included in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, as supplemented by Part II, Item 1A of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, ~~2018~~2019 and June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, and through updating of various statistical and other information †
	101.INS		Inline XBRL Instance Document
	101.SCH		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
	101.CAL		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
	101.DEF		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
	101.LAB		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
	101.PRE		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
104		Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)

* Denotes a management contract or compensatory plan.

† Filed herewith.

†† Furnished herewith.

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 ~~2018~~2019 | 8062

~~Table of contents~~

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized, on August ~~3, 2018.~~5, 2019.



	MGIC INVESTMENT CORPORATION

	/s/ ~~Timothy J. Mattke~~Nathaniel H. Colson
	~~Timothy J. Mattke~~Nathaniel H. Colson
	Executive Vice President and
	Chief Financial Officer

	/s/ Julie K. Sperber
	Julie K. Sperber
	Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer

MGIC Investment Corporation - Q2 ~~2018~~2019 | 8163



	Table	3.2
Interest payments on debt obligations			Six Months Ended June 30,
	(In millions)		2018		2017
	Revolving credit facility		$	0.3	$	0.5
	FHLB Advance		1.5		1.5
	5% Notes		—		3.6
	2% Notes		—		2.1
	5.75% Notes		12.2		12.9
	9% Debentures		11.6		11.6
	Total interest payments		$	25.6	$	32.2



	Table	4.1
Effect of Reinsurance			Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	(In thousands)		2018			2017			2018			2017
	Premiums earned:
	Direct		$	268,236		$	261,180		$	533,487		$	520,608
	Assumed		106			62			227			160
	Ceded		(21,378		)	(30,106		)	(54,643		)	(60,529		)
	Net premiums earned		$	246,964		$	231,136		$	479,071		$	460,239

	Losses incurred:
	Direct		$	(16,778	)	$	31,396		$	14,723		$	63,809
	Assumed		(100		)	61			(10		)	166
	Ceded		3,423			(4,118		)	(4,318		)	(9,017		)
	Losses incurred, net		$	(13,455	)	$	27,339		$	10,395		$	54,958



	Table	7.3a
Details of equity security investments - current year			June 30, 2018
	(In thousands)		Cost		Gross Gains		Gross Losses			Fair Value
	Equity securities		$	4,111	$	8	$	(71	)	$	4,048



	Table	7.4b
Investments unrealized losses - prior year-end			December 31, 2017
			Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or Greater					Total
	(In thousands)		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
	U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies		$	144,042	$	(796	)	$	31,196	$	(482	)	$	175,238	$	(1,278	)
	Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions		505,311		(3,624		)	211,684		(5,125		)	716,995		(8,749		)
	Corporate debt securities		932,350		(4,288		)	200,716		(4,881		)	1,133,066		(9,169		)
	ABS		4,923		(2		)	—		—			4,923		(2		)
	RMBS		14,979		(280		)	166,329		(7,084		)	181,308		(7,364		)
	CMBS		51,096		(358		)	138,769		(4,548		)	189,865		(4,906		)
	CLOs		14,243		(7		)	3,568		(72		)	17,811		(79		)
	Equity securities		226		(2		)	431		(14		)	657		(16		)
	Total		$	1,667,170	$	(9,357	)	$	752,693	$	(22,206	)	$	2,419,863	$	(31,563	)



	Table	8.1a
Fair value hierarchy - current year			June 30, 2018
Fair value hierarchy - current year	(In thousands)		Total Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies		$	132,770	$	18,922	$	113,848	$	—
	Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions		2,066,137		—		2,065,945		192
	Corporate debt securities		2,095,958		—		2,095,958		—
	ABS		71,292		—		71,292		—
	RMBS		163,726		—		163,726		—
	CMBS		283,343		—		283,343		—
	CLOs		113,021		—		113,021		—
	Total fixed income securities		4,926,247		18,922		4,907,133		192
	Equity securities ⁽¹⁾		4,048		2,880		—		1,168
	Total investments at fair value		$	4,930,295	$	21,802	$	4,907,133	$	1,360
	Real estate acquired ⁽²⁾		$	13,321	$	—	$	—	$	13,321



	Table	8.2a
Development of assets and liabilities classified within level 3 - current year quarter			Three Months Ended June 30, 2018
	(In thousands)		Debt Securities			Equity Securities		Total Investments			Real Estate Acquired
	Balance at March 31, 2018		$	254		$	1,168	$	1,422		$	10,078
	Total realized gains (losses):
	Included in earnings and reported as losses incurred, net		—			—		—			(996		)
	Purchases		—			—		—			10,869
	Sales		(62		)	—		(62		)	(6,630		)
	Balance at June 30, 2018		$	192		$	1,168	$	1,360		$	13,321



	Table	8.3a
Development of assets and liabilities classified within level 3 - current year to date			Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
	(In thousands)		Debt Securities			Equity Securities			Total Investments			Real Estate Acquired
	Balance at December 31, 2017		$	271		$	4,268		$	4,539		$	12,713
	Transfers out of Level 3		—			(3,100		)	(3,100		)	—
	Total realized gains (losses):
	Included in earnings and reported as losses incurred, net		—			—			—			(655		)
	Purchases		—			—			—			16,763
	Sales		(79		)	—			(79		)	(15,500		)
	Balance at June 30, 2018		$	192		$	1,168		$	1,360		$	13,321



	Table	8.3b
Development of assets and liabilities classified within level 3 - prior year to date			Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
	(In thousands)		Debt Securities			Equity Securities		Total Investments			Real Estate Acquired
	Balance at December 31, 2016		$	691		$	4,268	$	4,959		$	11,748
	Total realized gains (losses):
	Included in earnings and reported as losses incurred, net		—			—		—			(226		)
	Purchases		—			—		—			18,104
	Sales		(114		)	—		(114		)	(19,355		)
	Balance at June 30, 2017		$	577		$	4,268	$	4,845		$	10,271



	Table	8.4
Fair value measurements - liabilities			June 30, 2018				December 31, 2017
	(In thousands)		Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value
	FHLB Advance		$	155,000	$	149,135	$	155,000	$	152,124
	5.75% Notes		419,136		434,422		418,560		465,473
	9% Debentures		256,872		344,946		256,872		353,507
	Total financial liabilities		$	831,008	$	928,503	$	830,432	$	971,104



	Table	9.1
Components of other comprehensive (loss) income			Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	(In thousands)		2018			2017			2018			2017
	Net unrealized investment (losses) gains arising during the period		$	(12,558	)	$	39,614		$	(94,145	)	$	58,261
	Income tax benefit (expense)		2,636			(13,865		)	19,770			(20,391		)
	Net of taxes		(9,922		)	25,749			(74,375		)	37,870

	Net changes in benefit plan assets and obligations		491			(220		)	1,116			(454		)
	Income tax (expense) benefit		(103		)	78			(234		)	159
	Net of taxes		388			(142		)	882			(295		)

	Net changes in unrealized foreign currency translation adjustment		—			—			—			45
	Income tax (expense)		—			—			—			(14		)
	Net of taxes		—			—			—			31

	Total other comprehensive (loss) income		(12,067		)	39,394			(93,029		)	57,852
	Total income tax benefit (expense)		2,533			(13,787		)	19,536			(20,246		)
	Total other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax		$	(9,534	)	$	25,607		$	(73,493	)	$	37,606



	Table	9.2
Reclassifications from AOCL			Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	(In thousands)		2018			2017			2018			2017
	Reclassification adjustment for net realized (losses) ⁽¹⁾		$	(3,621	)	$	(1,392	)	$	(3,712	)	$	(2,139	)
	Income tax benefit		760			487			779			748
	Net of taxes		(2,861		)	(905		)	(2,933		)	(1,391		)

	Reclassification adjustment related to benefit plan assets and obligations ⁽²⁾		(491		)	220			(1,116		)	454
	Income tax benefit (expense)		103			(78		)	234			(159		)
	Net of taxes		(388		)	142			(882		)	295

	Total reclassifications		(4,112		)	(1,172		)	(4,828		)	(1,685		)
	Total income tax benefit		863			409			1,013			589
	Total reclassifications, net of tax		$	(3,249	)	$	(763	)	$	(3,815	)	$	(1,096	)



	Table	9.3
Rollforward of AOCL			Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
Rollforward of AOCL	(In thousands)		Net unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities			Net benefit plan assets and obligations recognized in shareholders' equity			Total AOCL
	Balance, December 31, 2017, net of tax		$	29,257		$	(73,058	)	$	(43,801	)
	Other comprehensive income before reclassifications		(77,308		)	—			(77,308		)
	Less: Amounts reclassified from AOCL		(2,933		)	(882		)	(3,815		)
	Balance, June 30, 2018, net of tax		$	(45,118	)	$	(72,176	)	$	(117,294	)



	Table	12.5
Delinquent inventory - number of payments delinquent			June 30, 2018			December 31, 2017			June 30, 2017
	3 payments or less		14,178	39	%	21,678	46	%	15,858	38	%
	4-11 payments		11,429	32	%	12,446	27	%	10,560	26	%
	12 payments or more ^{(1) (2)}		10,430	29	%	12,432	27	%	14,899	36	%
	Total primary delinquent inventory		36,037	100	%	46,556	100	%	41,317	100	%




Loan-to-Value		Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	(% of primary NIW)	2018		2017		2018		2017
	95.01% and above	15.4	%	9.7	%	14.4	%	9.0	%
	90.01% to 95.00%	44.1	%	48.1	%	44.1	%	47.7	%
	85.01% to 90.00%	28.8	%	29.9	%	28.9	%	30.1	%
	80.01% to 85%	11.7	%	12.3	%	12.6	%	13.2	%




Type of mortgage		Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	(% of primary NIW)	2018		2017		2018		2017
	Purchases	94.1	%	91.3	%	91.5	%	87.9	%
	Refinances	5.9	%	8.7	%	8.5	%	12.1	%




Captive reinsurance		As of and For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	($ in thousands)	2018			2017
	IIF subject to captive reinsurance agreements	—		%	1		%

	Statements of operations:
	Ceded premiums written	$	37		$	2,519
	% of direct premiums written	—		%	0.5		%
	Ceded premiums earned	$	84		$	2,542
	% of direct premiums earned	—		%	0.5		%
	Ceded losses incurred	$	266		$	(37	)




Claims severity trend	Period	Average exposure on claim paid		Average claim paid		% Paid to exposure		Average number of missed payments at claim received date
	Q2 2018	$	44,522	$	50,175	112.7	%	39
	Q1 2018	45,597		51,069		112.0	%	38
	Q4 2017	44,437		49,177		110.7	%	36
	Q3 2017	43,313		46,389		107.1	%	35
	Q2 2017	44,747		49,105		109.7	%	35
	Q1 2017	44,238		49,110		111.0	%	35
	Q4 2016	43,200		48,297		111.8	%	35
	Q3 2016	43,747		48,050		109.8	%	34
	Q2 2016	43,709		47,953		109.7	%	35
	Q1 2016	44,094		49,281		111.8	%	34

	Note: Table excludes material settlements. Settlements include amounts paid in settlement disputes for claims paying practices and commutations of pools of NPLs.

CLASS OF STOCK

NUMBER OF SHARES

Common stock

July 31, 2018