UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)



ý	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016



o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 1-11884

ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Republic of Liberia		98-0081645
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1050 Caribbean Way, Miami, Florida 33132

(Address of principal executive offices) (zip code)

(305) 539-6000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý

There were ~~219,995,391~~214,582,024 shares of common stock outstanding as of October ~~16, 2015.~~20, 2016.

Table of Contents

ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(unaudited; in thousands, except per share data)


	Quarter Ended September 30,						Quarter Ended September 30,
	2015			2014			2016			2015
Passenger ticket revenues	$	1,873,942		$	1,786,746		$	1,899,956		$	1,873,942
Onboard and other revenues	649,158			602,016			663,785			649,158
Total revenues	2,523,100			2,388,762			2,563,741			2,523,100
Cruise operating expenses:
Commissions, transportation and other	413,156			396,916			400,933			413,156
Onboard and other	175,214			182,658			159,887			175,214
Payroll and related	217,627			214,260			214,081			217,627
Food	122,124			120,908			125,732			122,124
Fuel	199,848			230,818			178,772			199,848
Other operating	259,057			281,322			260,718			259,057
Total cruise operating expenses	1,387,026			1,426,882			1,340,123			1,387,026
Marketing, selling and administrative expenses	256,060			239,662			257,430			256,060
Depreciation and amortization expenses	210,742			192,448			229,328			210,742
Impairment of Pullmantur related assets	411,267			—			—			411,267
Restructuring charges	—			308			1,897			—
Operating Income	258,005			529,462			734,963			258,005
Other income (expense):
Interest income	1,735			2,117			6,472			1,735
Interest expense, net of interest capitalized	(66,819		)	(60,100		)	(82,610		)	(66,819		)
Other income (including in 2015 a net deferred tax benefit of $12.0 million related to the Pullmantur impairment)	35,866			18,769			34,432			35,866
	(29,218		)	(39,214		)	(41,706		)	(29,218		)
Net Income	$	228,787		$	490,248		$	693,257		$	228,787
Earnings per Share:
Basic	$	1.04		$	2.20		$	3.23		$	1.04
Diluted	$	1.03		$	2.19		$	3.21		$	1.03
Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding:
Basic	219,963			222,523			214,819			219,963
Diluted	221,137			223,859			215,667			221,137
Comprehensive Income
Net Income	$	228,787		$	490,248		$	693,257		$	228,787
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustments	(4,191		)	(18,482		)	4,043			(4,191		)
Change in defined benefit plans	3,318			(1,451		)	(5,051		)	3,318
Loss on cash flow derivative hedges	(222,492		)	(249,626		)
Total other comprehensive loss	(223,365		)	(269,559		)
Gain (loss) on cash flow derivative hedges							95,536			(222,492		)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)							94,528			(223,365		)
Comprehensive Income	$	5,422		$	220,689		$	787,785		$	5,422

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(unaudited; in thousands, except per share data)


	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2015			2014			2016			2015
Passenger ticket revenues	$	4,688,189		$	4,590,048		$	4,794,653		$	4,688,189
Onboard and other revenues	1,708,832			1,665,981			1,792,145			1,708,832
Total revenues	6,397,021			6,256,029			6,586,798			6,397,021
Cruise operating expenses:
Commissions, transportation and other	1,093,409			1,068,961			1,060,391			1,093,409
Onboard and other	438,558			456,296			399,739			438,558
Payroll and related	647,788			634,232			671,955			647,788
Food	361,317			358,172			371,759			361,317
Fuel	607,689			718,081			531,283			607,689
Other operating	777,291			825,794			857,161			777,291
Total cruise operating expenses	3,926,052			4,061,536			3,892,288			3,926,052
Marketing, selling and administrative expenses	817,040			790,957			845,808			817,040
Depreciation and amortization expenses	617,678			579,063			661,712			617,678
Impairment of Pullmantur related assets	411,267			—			—			411,267
Restructuring charges	—			1,958			6,627			—
Operating Income	624,984			822,515			1,180,363			624,984
Other income (expense):
Interest income	8,244			8,023			14,875			8,244
Interest expense, net of interest capitalized	(213,598		)	(193,931		)	(226,803		)	(213,598		)
Other income (including in 2015 a net deferred tax benefit of $12.0 million related to the Pullmantur impairment)	39,354			17,771
Other income (including a $21.7 million loss related to the 2016 elimination of the Pullmantur reporting lag and including in 2015 a net deferred tax benefit of $12.0 million related to the Pullmantur impairment)							53,867			39,354
	(166,000		)	(168,137		)	(158,061		)	(166,000		)
Net Income	$	458,984		$	654,378		$	1,022,302		$	458,984
Earnings per Share:
Basic	$	2.09		$	2.95		$	4.74		$	2.09
Diluted	$	2.08		$	2.93		$	4.72		$	2.08
Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding:
Basic	219,835			222,007			215,663			219,835
Diluted	220,979			223,351			216,575			220,979
Comprehensive Income
Net Income	$	458,984		$	654,378		$	1,022,302		$	458,984
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustments	(23,994		)	(17,845		)	8,423			(23,994		)
Change in defined benefit plans	5,567			(5,536		)	(12,148		)	5,567
Loss on cash flow derivative hedges	(280,968		)	(323,179		)
Total other comprehensive loss	(299,395		)	(346,560		)
Gain (loss) on cash flow derivative hedges							254,624			(280,968		)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)							250,899			(299,395		)
Comprehensive Income	$	159,589		$	307,818		$	1,273,201		$	159,589

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share data)


	As of						As of
	September 30,			December 31,			September 30,			December 31,
	2015			2014			2016			2015
	(unaudited)						(unaudited)
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	147,419		$	189,241		$	178,428		$	121,565
Trade and other receivables, net	241,638			261,392			273,422			238,972
Inventories	131,108			123,490			118,849			121,332
Prepaid expenses and other assets	269,914			226,960			231,442			220,579
Derivative financial instruments	110,747			—			928			134,574
Total current assets	900,826			801,083			803,069			837,022
Property and equipment, net	18,776,782			18,193,627			20,230,803			18,777,778
Goodwill	286,707			420,542			288,461			286,764
Other assets	994,533			1,297,938			1,127,929			880,479
	$	20,958,848		$	20,713,190		$	22,450,262		$	20,782,043
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Current liabilities
Current portion of long-term debt	$	905,128		$	799,630		$	1,298,002		$	899,542
Accounts payable	305,747			331,505			259,027			302,072
Accrued interest	83,281			49,074			95,112			38,325
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	630,455			635,138			678,874			658,601
Derivative financial instruments	549,524			266,986			201,877			651,866
Customer deposits	1,886,356			1,766,914			1,967,678			1,742,286
Total current liabilities	4,360,491			3,849,247			4,500,570			4,292,692
Long-term debt	7,584,808			7,644,318			8,419,850			7,627,701
Other long-term liabilities	757,763			935,266			739,693			798,611
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7)
Shareholders’ equity
Preferred stock ($0.01 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized; none outstanding)	—			—			—			—
Common stock ($0.01 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized; 233,796,056 and 233,106,019 shares issued, September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively)	2,338			2,331
Common stock ($0.01 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized; 234,589,237 and 233,905,166 shares issued, September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively)							2,346			2,339
Paid-in capital	3,279,806			3,253,552			3,316,385			3,297,619
Retained earnings	6,819,809			6,575,248			7,702,260			6,944,862
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(1,196,389		)	(896,994		)	(1,077,534		)	(1,328,433		)
Treasury stock (13,808,683 common shares at cost, September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014)	(649,778		)	(649,778		)
Treasury stock (20,019,237 and 15,911,971 common shares at cost, September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively)							(1,153,308		)	(853,348		)
Total shareholders’ equity	8,255,786			8,284,359			8,790,149			8,063,039
	$	20,958,848		$	20,713,190		$	22,450,262		$	20,782,043

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(~~unaudited,~~unaudited; in thousands)


	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2015			2014			2016			2015
Operating Activities
Net income	$	458,984		$	654,378		$	1,022,302		$	458,984
Adjustments:
Depreciation and amortization	617,678			579,063			661,712			617,678
Impairment of Pullmantur related assets	411,267			—			—			411,267
Net deferred income tax (benefit) expense	(13,466		)	1,177
Net deferred income tax expense (benefit)							1,601			(13,466		)
Loss on derivative instruments not designated as hedges	49,607			24,234			6,353			49,607
Loss on sale of property and equipment	—			17,401
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Decrease in trade and other receivables, net	24,130			69,833			9,823			24,130
(Increase) decrease in inventories	(8,377		)	13,900
Increase in prepaid expenses and other assets	(30,649		)	(3,596		)
Increase in inventories							(6,379		)	(8,377		)
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses and other assets							2,484			(30,649		)
Decrease in accounts payable	(22,915		)	(33,668		)	(17,313		)	(22,915		)
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest	34,207			(36,693		)
Increase in accrued interest							56,787			34,207
Increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities	11,558			48,600			23,216			11,558
Increase in customer deposits	65,511			104,211			197,277			65,511
Dividends received from unconsolidated affiliates							71,370			5,327
Other, net	10,401			20,724			(28,281		)	5,074
Net cash provided by operating activities	1,607,936			1,459,564			2,000,952			1,607,936
Investing Activities
Purchases of property and equipment	(1,360,637		)	(559,018		)	(2,313,831		)	(1,360,637		)
Cash paid on settlement of derivative financial instruments	(158,890		)	(14,808		)	(172,878		)	(158,890		)
Investments in and loans to unconsolidated affiliates	(54,250		)	(69,748		)	(8,611		)	(54,250		)
Cash received on loans to unconsolidated affiliates	122,710			76,167			22,470			122,710
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment	—			220,000
Other, net	(18,642		)	2,592
Other, net ⁽¹⁾							(44,709		)	(18,642		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(1,469,709		)	(344,815		)	(2,517,559		)	(1,469,709		)
Financing Activities
Debt proceeds	2,962,501			1,917,550			6,038,560			2,962,501
Debt issuance costs	(57,146		)	(49,641		)	(83,793		)	(57,146		)
Repayments of debt	(2,887,237		)	(2,958,427		)	(4,818,262		)	(2,887,237		)
Purchases of treasury stock							(299,959		)	—
Dividends paid	(197,718		)	(131,857		)	(243,557		)	(197,718		)
Proceeds from exercise of common stock options	6,902			65,885			1,782			6,902
Cash received on settlement of derivative financial instruments	—			22,835
Other, net	1,778			1,422			2,179			1,778
Net cash used in financing activities	(170,920		)	(1,132,233		)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities							596,950			(170,920		)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	(9,129		)	(4,022		)	(23,480		)	(9,129		)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(41,822		)	(21,506		)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents							56,863			(41,822		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	189,241			204,687			121,565			189,241
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	147,419		$	183,181		$	178,428		$	147,419
Supplemental Disclosure
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest, net of amount capitalized	$	151,661		$	208,311		$	140,335		$	151,661
Non-cash Investing Activities
Notes receivable issued upon sale of property and equipment							$	213,042		$	—

⁽¹⁾Amount includes $26.0 million related to cash included in the divestiture of RCHE.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

As used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the terms “Royal Caribbean,” the “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” refer to Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. and, depending on the context, Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.’s consolidated subsidiaries and/or affiliates. The terms “Royal Caribbean International,” “Celebrity Cruises,” ~~“Pullmantur,”~~ “Azamara Club Cruises,” “TUI Cruises,” “Pullmantur,” and “CDF Croisières de France” ~~and “TUI Cruises”~~ refer to our cruise brands. However, because TUI Cruises is an unconsolidated investment, our operating results and other disclosures herein do not include TUI Cruises unless otherwise specified. Additionally, prior to August 2016, both Pullmantur and CDF Croisières de France ("CDF") were wholly owned by us. However, in July 2016, we sold 51% of our interest in Pullmantur and CDF, therefore, for the period subsequent to the sale, our operating results and other disclosures herein do not include Pullmantur and CDF unless otherwise specified. In accordance with cruise vacation industry practice, the term “berths” is determined based on double occupancy per cabin even though many cabins can accommodate three or more passengers. This report should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2014,~~2015, including the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included therein.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q also includes trademarks, trade names and service marks of other companies. Use or display by us of other parties’ trademarks, trade names or service marks is not intended to and does not imply a relationship with, or endorsement or sponsorship of us by, these other parties other than as described herein.

Note 1. General

Description of Business

We are a global cruise company. WeAs of September 30, 2016, we own and operate three global cruise brands: Royal Caribbean International, Celebrity Cruises ~~Pullmantur,~~and Azamara Club ~~Cruises, CDF Croisières de France and~~Cruises. We also own a 50% joint venture interest in the German brand TUI ~~Cruises.~~Cruises, a 49% interest in the Spanish brand Pullmantur and have minority interests in other smaller regional brands.

Prior to August 2016, Royal Caribbean Holdings de Espana ("RCHE"), the parent company of the Pullmantur and CDF brands, was wholly owned by us. Effective July 31, 2016, we sold 51% of our interest in RCHE. We retain a 49% interest in RCHE as well as full ownership of the vessels currently operated by the brands, which are bareboat chartered to RCHE. We account for the bareboat charters of the vessels to RCHE as operating leases. We also provide certain ship management services to RCHE. As a result of the sale of a majority interest in RCHE, we recognized an immaterial gain. In addition, we also continue to retain full ownership of the aircraft, which were not impacted by this sale transaction. Effective August 2016, we no longer consolidate RCHE in our consolidated financial statements and our investment in the company is accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Refer to Note 5. Other Assets for further information on our retained interest in RCHE.

The sale did not represent a strategic shift that will have a major effect on our operations and financial results, as we continue to provide similar itineraries to and source passengers from the markets served by the Pullmantur and CDF businesses. Therefore, the sale of RCHE did not meet the criteria for discontinued operations reporting. Due to the change in the nature of the cash flows to be generated by the vessels operated by RCHE, we also reviewed the vessels for impairment. We determined that the undiscounted future cash flows of the vessels exceeded their carrying value; therefore, no impairment was required.

Basis for Preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements

The unaudited consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Estimates are required for the preparation of financial statements in accordance with these principles. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Refer to Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015 for a discussion of our significant accounting policies.

All significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. We consolidate entities over which we have control, usually evidenced by a direct ownership interest of greater than 50%, and variable interest entities where we are determined to be the primary beneficiary. Refer to Note 5. Other Assets for further information regarding our variable interest entities. For affiliates we do not control but over which we have significant influence on financial and operating policies, usually evidenced by a direct ownership interest from 20% to 50%, the investment is accounted for using the equity method. ~~We consolidate~~

Prior to January 1, 2016, we consolidated the operating results of ~~Pullmantur and CDF Croisières de France~~RCHE on a two-month reporting lag to allow for more timely preparation of our consolidated financial statements. ~~Except for the impairment of Pullmantur related assets, as described in Note 3.~~ ~~Impairment of Pullmantur Related Assets,~~ ~~no material events or transactions affecting Pullmantur or CDF Croisières de France have occurred during~~Effective January 1, 2016, we eliminated the two-month reporting lag ~~period of August and September 2015 that would require further disclosure or adjustment to our consolidated financial statements as of and for the quarter ended September 30, 2015~~.

We believe the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation. Our revenues are seasonal and results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the entire year.

Table of Contents

to reflect RCHE's financial position, results of operations and cash flows concurrently and consistently with the fiscal calendar of the Company ("elimination of the Pullmantur reporting lag"). The elimination of the Pullmantur reporting lag represented a change in accounting principle which we believed to be preferable because it provided more current information to the users of our financial statements. A change in accounting principle requires retrospective application, if material. The impact of the elimination of the reporting lag was immaterial to prior periods and is expected to be immaterial for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2016. As a result, we have accounted for this change in accounting principle in our consolidated results for the first nine months of 2016. Accordingly, the results of RCHE for November and December 2015 are included in our statement of comprehensive income (loss) for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The effect of this change was a decrease to net income of $21.7 million, which has been reported within Other income in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

~~Revenues and Expenses~~

We recognize passenger ticket revenues, revenues from onboard and other goods and services and all associated cruise operating costs for all of our uncompleted voyages on a pro-rata basis. Prior to September 30, 2014, we recognized revenues and cruise operating costs for our shorter voyages (voyages of ten days or less) upon voyage completion while we recognized revenues and cruise operating costs for voyages in excess of ten days on a pro-rata basis.

The change to prorate all voyages as of September 30, 2014 forward was not retrospectively applied to prior periods, as the impact of prorating all voyages was immaterial to the respective periods presented.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, amended GAAP guidance was issued to clarify the principles used to recognize revenue for all entities. The guidance is based on the principle that revenue should be recognized to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The standard also requires more detailed disclosures and provides additional guidance for transactions that were not comprehensively addressed in the prior accounting guidance. This guidance must be applied using one of two retrospective application ~~methods. In August 2015, the effective date of this guidance was deferred by one year~~methods and will ~~now~~ be effective for our annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted for our annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods therein. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, of the adoption of ~~this newly issued~~the revenue recognition guidance to our consolidated financial ~~statements.~~statements and intend to elect the modified retrospective method to all contracts on the date of initial application, January 1, 2018. This will involve applying the guidance retrospectively only to the most current period presented in the financial statements and recognizing the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance as an adjustment to the January 1, 2018 opening balance of retained earnings at the date of initial application.

In August 2014, GAAP guidance was issued requiring management to evaluate, at each annual and interim reporting period, whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued and provide related disclosures. This guidance will be effective for our annual reporting period ending after December 15, 2016 and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this ~~newly issued~~ guidance is not expected to have an ~~impact to our consolidated financial statements.~~

In January 2015, amended GAAP guidance was issued changing the requirements for reporting extraordinary and unusual items in the income statement. The update eliminates the concept of extraordinary items. The presentation and disclosure guidance for items that are unusual in nature or occur infrequently will be retained and will be expanded to include items that are both unusual in nature and infrequently occurring. A reporting entity may apply the amendments prospectively or retrospectively to all periods presented in the financial statements. The guidance will be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted provided that the guidance is applied from the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have an impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2015, amended GAAP guidance was issued affecting current consolidation guidance. The guidance changes the analysis that a reporting entity must perform to determine whether it should consolidate certain types of legal entities. This guidance must be applied using one of two retrospective application methods and will be effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in any interim period. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have an impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, amended GAAP guidance was issued simplifying the presentation of debt issuance costs. The guidance requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by these amendments. Additionally, in August 2015, amended GAAP guidance was issued to clarify the presentation of debt issuance costs associated with line-of-credit arrangements. The amendments continue to allow an entity to present debt issuance costs as an asset with subsequent amortization over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. This guidance should be applied on a retrospective basis, wherein the balance sheet of each individual period presented should be adjusted to reflect the period-specific effects of applying the new guidance. The guidance will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have an impact to our consolidated financial statements, with the exception of reclassifying debt issuance costs from ~~Other assets~~ ~~to be reflected as a reduction of our current and long-term liabilities.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

In April 2015, amended GAAP guidance was issued to provide a practical expedient for the measurement date of an employer's defined benefit obligation and plan assets. The guidance provides a practical expedient for entities with a fiscal year-end that does not coincide with a month-end and for contributions or significant events that occur between the month-end date and an entity's fiscal year end. The guidance will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier application is permitted. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have an impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, amended GAAP guidance was issued to clarify a customer’s accounting for fees paid in a cloud computing arrangement. The amendments provide guidance to customers about whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license or if the arrangement should be accounted for as a service contract. This guidance will impact the accounting of software licenses but will not change a customer’s accounting for service contracts. The guidance will be effective for annual periods, including interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. An entity can elect to adopt the amendments either prospectively or retrospectively. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In July 2015, amended GAAP guidance was issued to simplify the measurement of inventory for all entities. The amendments apply to all inventory that is measured using first-in, first-out or average cost. The guidance requires an entity to measure inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. The guidance must be applied prospectively and will be effective for our interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The adoption of this ~~newly issued~~ guidance is not expected to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In ~~September~~November 2015, amended GAAP guidance was issued to simplify the ~~accounting for measurement-period adjustments related to business combinations.~~presentation of deferred income taxes. The amendments require that ~~an acquirer recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period~~deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in ~~the reporting period in which the adjustments are determined~~a classified statement of financial position and eliminates the ~~requirement to retroactively adjust the provisional amounts recognized at the acquisition date.~~classification between current and noncurrent amounts. The guidance will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, ~~2015, including~~2016 and interim periods within those fiscal years. An entity can elect to adopt the amendments either prospectively or retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, amended GAAP guidance was issued to address certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments. The amendments ~~should~~primarily impact the accounting for certain equity investments, the accounting for financial liabilities subject to the fair value option and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. The guidance will be ~~applied prospectively to measurement period adjustments that occur~~effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after ~~the effective date.~~December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for financial statements of fiscal years and interim periods that have not yet been ~~issued.~~issued or that have not yet been made available for issuance as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, amended GAAP guidance was issued to increase the transparency and comparability of lease accounting among organizations. For leases with a term greater than 12 months, the amendments require the lease rights and obligations arising from the leasing arrangements, including operating leases, to be recognized as assets and liabilities on the balance sheet. The amendments also expand the required disclosures surrounding leasing arrangements. The guidance must be applied using a

Table of Contents

retrospective application method and will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this newly issued guidance to our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, amended GAAP guidance was issued addressing the effect of derivative contract novations on existing hedge accounting relationships. The amendments clarify that a change in the counterparty to a derivative instrument that has been designated as a hedging instrument does not, in and of itself, require dedesignation of that hedging relationship provided that all other hedge accounting criteria continue to be met. The guidance must be applied using a prospective or modified retrospective application method and will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, amended GAAP guidance was issued addressing contingent put and call options in debt instruments. The amendments clarify the requirements for assessing whether contingent call and put options that can accelerate the payment of principal on debt instruments are clearly and closely related to their debt hosts, or whether the embedded call and put options should be bifurcated from the related debt instrument and accounted for separately as a derivative. The guidance must be applied using a modified retrospective approach and will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have an impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, amended GAAP guidance was issued to simplify the transition to the equity method of accounting. The amendments eliminate the requirement that when an investment qualifies for use of the equity method as a result of an increase in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence, an investor must adjust the investment, results of operations and retained earnings retroactively on a step-by step basis as if the equity method had been in effect during all previous periods that the investment had been held. The guidance must be applied prospectively and will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements, but could have an impact on our accounting for equity method investments in the future.

In March 2016, amended GAAP guidance was issued to simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. The guidance will be effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, amended GAAP guidance was issued to address expected credit losses on financial instruments and other commitments. The amendment requires financial assets and net investment leases that are currently measured at amortized cost basis be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. The guidance must be applied using the modified-retrospective approach and will be effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019 and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted beginning after December 15, 2018. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, amended GAAP guidance was issued to clarify how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The amendments are aimed at reducing the existing diversity in practice. The guidance should be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented and will be effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

Other

Revenues and expenses include port costs that vary with guest head counts. The amounts of such port costs included in Passenger ticket revenues on a gross basis were ~~$156.8~~$158.7 million and ~~$155.0~~$156.8 million for the third quarters of ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014,~~2015, respectively, and ~~$425.6~~$443.1 million and ~~$416.8~~$425.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014,~~2015, respectively.

Reclassifications

On January 1, ~~2015,~~2016, we adopted ~~ASC 853, Service Concession Arrangements~~Accounting Standards Codification ("~~ASC 853"~~ASC"), 835, Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, using the ~~modified~~ retrospective approach. Due to the adoption of ASC ~~853, $41.9~~835, $139.8 million ~~has~~of debt issuance costs have been reclassified in the

Table of Contents

consolidated balance sheet, as of December 31, ~~2014,~~2015, from ~~Property and equipment, net~~ toOther assets to either Current portion of long-term debt or Long-term debt in order to conform to the current year presentation. ~~The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements as of and for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015.~~

For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2014, $1.2~~2015, $5.3 million has been reclassified in the consolidated statements of cash flows from Other, net toDividends received from unconsolidated affiliates ~~Net deferred income tax (benefit) expense~~ within Net cash provided by operating activities in order to conform to the current year presentation.

~~Note 3. Impairment of Pullmantur Related Assets~~

Pullmantur is a brand targeted primarily at the Spanish and Latin American markets. These markets have experienced significant volatility and the brand has adopted various changes to its operating strategy as a result. Most recently, in response to favorable economic expectations in Latin America, especially Brazil, management undertook a positioning of the brand to increase sourcing of guests and to deliver deployment for Latin American consumers; transferring newer and more efficient capacity to the brand; and selling Pullmantur’s non-cruise businesses to allow the brand to focus on the core cruise business.

~~Table of Contents~~

However, the Latin American resurgence was short lived and the core Latin American economies, including Brazil, Mexico, Argentina and Venezuela, have regressed and their currencies have materially depreciated versus the US dollar. During the second quarter of 2015, as a result of the weakness in Latin America, we decided to defer the scheduled transfer of Royal Caribbean International’s ~~Majesty of the Seas~~ to the Pullmantur fleet. During our most recently completed quarter, the negative economic trends significantly deteriorated. Most notably, the Brazilian Real devalued by approximately 22% relative to the US dollar during the third quarter of 2015.

In light of the increased challenges facing Pullmantur’s Latin American strategy, we recently made a decision to significantly change that strategy from growing the brand through vessel transfers to a right-sizing strategy. This right-sizing strategy includes reducing our exposure to Latin America, refocusing on the brand’s core market of Spain and, consequently, reducing the size of Pullmantur’s fleet. This strategic change includes a decision to redeploy Pullmantur’s ~~Empress~~ ~~to the Royal Caribbean International brand as well as a decision to cancel the intended transfer of the~~ ~~Majesty of the Seas~~ to Pullmantur. As we previously disclosed, the planned growth of the Pullmantur fleet through the transfer of vessels into the brand has been the most significant assumption within Pullmantur's projected cash flows supporting the recoverability of the Pullmantur reporting unit’s goodwill and trademarks and trade names. Our decision to reduce the size of Pullmantur’s fleet significantly decreases the cash flow projections which have been the basis of our impairment analysis.

As a result of these developments, we performed an interim impairment evaluation of Pullmantur’s goodwill and trademarks and trade names in connection with the preparation of our financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2015. We estimated the fair value of the Pullmantur reporting unit using a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model. The estimation of future cash flows requires our significant judgment when making assumptions of expected revenues, operating costs, marketing, selling and administrative expenses, interest rates, ship additions and retirements as well as assumptions regarding the cruise vacation industry’s competitive environment and general and economic business conditions, among other factors.

Due to the previously described market conditions and our recent decision to reduce our exposure to Latin America, refocus on the brand’s core Spanish market and reduce the brand's overall capacity, we reviewed the two-step goodwill impairment test based on the updated cash flow projections. As a result of this analysis, we determined that the carrying value of the Pullmantur reporting unit exceeded its fair value. Similarly, we determined that the carrying value of Pullmantur’s trademarks and trade names exceeded their fair value as well. Accordingly, upon the completion of the two-step impairment test, we recognized an impairment charge of $123.8 million and $174.3 million for goodwill and trademark and trade names, respectively, during the quarter ended September 30, 2015. These charges reflect the full carrying amounts of the goodwill and trademark and trade names leaving Pullmantur with no intangible assets on its books.

Additionally, in conjunction with performing the two-step goodwill impairment test, we identified that the estimated fair value of certain long-lived assets, consisting of two ships and three aircraft were less than their carrying values. As a result of this determination, we evaluated these assets pursuant to our long-lived asset impairment test. The decision to significantly reduce our exposure to the Latin American market negatively impacted the expected undiscounted cash flows of these vessels and aircraft and resulted in an impairment charge of $113.2 million to write down these assets to their estimated fair values during the quarter ended September 30, 2015. The remaining assets for the Pullmantur reporting unit have fair values greater than or equal to their carrying amounts.

~~The carrying amounts of goodwill and intangible assets attributable to our Pullmantur reporting unit were as follows (in thousands):~~

Goodwill Intangibles
Balance at December 31, 2014 $ 133,583
$ 188,037
Impairment of Pullmantur related assets (123,814 ) (174,285 )
Foreign currency translation adjustment (9,769 ) (13,752 )
Balance at September 30, 2015 $ —
$ —

~~Intangible assets are reported within~~ ~~Other assets~~ ~~in our consolidated balance sheets.~~

Pullmantur had recognized a deferred tax liability of $43.4 million, which represented the tax effect of the basis difference between the tax and book values of Pullmantur’s trademarks and trade names. In addition, Pullmantur had recognized a net deferred tax asset relating to net operating losses with an unlimited carryforward period. The benefit of the deferred tax asset was previously assumed through the future realization of the deferred tax liability. A partial valuation allowance was previously established against the deferred tax asset since the utilization of the net operating losses is subject to a 70% annual limitation. As a result of the

~~Table of Contents~~

impairment of the trademarks and trade names, we reversed the deferred tax liability of $43.4 million and increased the valuation allowance by $31.4 million, or to 100% of the deferred tax asset balance, resulting in a $12.0 million deferred tax benefit recognized during the quarter ended September 30, 2015.

~~The combined impairment charge of $411.3 million related to Pullmantur’s goodwill, trademarks and trade names, vessels and aircraft was reported within~~ ~~Impairment of Pullmantur related assets~~ ~~and the net $12.0 million deferred tax benefit was reported within~~ ~~Other income (expense)~~ ~~in our statement of comprehensive income (loss), resulting in a net impairment loss of $399.3 million.~~

Note 4.3. Earnings Per Share

A reconciliation between basic and diluted earnings per share is as follows (in thousands, except per share data):


	Quarter Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,				Quarter Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2015		2014		2015		2014		2016		2015		2016		2015
Net income for basic and diluted earnings per share	$	228,787	$	490,248	$	458,984	$	654,378	$	693,257	$	228,787	$	1,022,302	$	458,984
Weighted-average common shares outstanding	219,963		222,523		219,835		222,007		214,819		219,963		215,663		219,835
Dilutive effect of stock options, performance share awards and restricted stock awards	1,174		1,336		1,144		1,344		848		1,174		912		1,144
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding	221,137		223,859		220,979		223,351		215,667		221,137		216,575		220,979
Basic earnings per share	$	1.04	$	2.20	$	2.09	$	2.95	$	3.23	$	1.04	$	4.74	$	2.09
Diluted earnings per share	$	1.03	$	2.19	$	2.08	$	2.93	$	3.21	$	1.03	$	4.72	$	2.08

There were no antidilutive shares for the quarters and nine month periods ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and September 30, ~~2014, respectively.~~2015.

Table of Contents

Note 4. Property and Equipment

In April 2016, we completed the previously announced sale of Splendour of the Seas to TUI Cruises. Concurrent with the acquisition, TUI Cruises leased the ship to Thomson Cruises, an affiliate of TUI AG, our joint venture partner, who will operate the ship. The gain recognized did not have a material effect to our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, we entered into an agreement to sell a ship to Thomson Cruises. The sale is scheduled to be completed in March 2017 in order to retain the future revenues to be generated for sailings through that date. We expect to recognize a gain on the sale, which we do not expect will have a material effect to our annual consolidated financial statements.

Note 5. Other Assets

A Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”) is an entity in which the equity investors have not provided enough equity to finance the entity’s activities or the equity investors: (1) cannot directly or indirectly make decisions about the entity’s activities through their voting rights or similar rights; (2) do not have the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity; (3) do not have the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity; or (4) have voting rights that are not proportionate to their economic interests and the entity’s activities involve or are conducted on behalf of an investor with a disproportionately small voting interest.

We have determined that TUI Cruises GmbH, our 50%-owned joint venture, which operates the brand TUI Cruises, is a VIE. As of September 30, ~~2015 and December 31, 2014,~~2016, the net book value of our investment ~~including equity and loans,~~ in TUI Cruises was approximately ~~$338.4~~$513.6 million, consisting of $304.3 million in equity and ~~$370.1 million, respectively.~~a loan of $209.3 million. The loan, which was made in connection with the sale of Splendour of the Seas in April 2016, accrues interest at a rate of 6.25% per annum and is payable over a 10-year term. This loan is 50% guaranteed by TUI AG, our joint venture partner, and is secured by a first priority mortgage on the ship. Refer to Note 4. Property and Equipment for further information. As of ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2015, ~~this amount~~the net book value of our investment in TUI Cruises was approximately $293.8 million, consisting of equity. The majority of these amounts were included within Other assets in our consolidated balance sheets.

In addition, we and TUI AG ~~our joint venture partner,~~ have each guaranteed the repayment of 50% of a bank ~~loan originally borrowed by TUI Cruises in 2011 and refinanced in May 2015. In connection with the refinancing, the principal amount of the loan was increased by €40.0 million.~~loan. As of September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, the outstanding principal amount of the loan was ~~€142.7~~€121.6 million, or approximately ~~$159.3~~$136.6 million based on the exchange rate at September 30, ~~2015. In addition the maturity date was extended from~~2016. While this loan matures in May ~~2016 to May 2022. Notwithstanding this,~~2022, the lenders have agreed to release each shareholder's guarantee in 2018. The loan ~~continues to amortize~~amortizes quarterly and ~~to be~~is secured by first mortgages on the Mein Schiff 1 and Mein Schiff 2 vessels. Based on current facts and circumstances, we do not believe potential obligations under our guarantee of this bank loan are probable.

The €40.0 million of additional proceeds received by TUI Cruises in connection with the refinancing of the bank loan discussed above were used during the second quarter of 2015 to repay in full the outstanding balance of the debt facility we originally provided to TUI Cruises in 2011 in connection with our sale of ~~Celebrity Mercury~~.

Our investment amount, outstanding term loan and the potential obligations under ~~this~~the bank loan guarantee are substantially our maximum exposure to ~~loss.~~loss in connection with our investment in TUI Cruises. We have determined that we are not the primary beneficiary of TUI Cruises. We believe that the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact TUI Cruises’ economic performance are shared between ourselves and TUI AG. All the significant operating and financial decisions of TUI Cruises require the consent of both parties, which we believe creates shared power over TUI Cruises. Accordingly, we do not consolidate this entity and account for this investment under the equity method of accounting.

~~Table of Contents~~

As of September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, TUI Cruises has ~~four~~three newbuild ships on order ~~with Meyer Turku~~ scheduled to be delivered in each of ~~2016,~~ 2017, 2018 and 2019. TUI Cruises has in place ~~commitments~~agreements for the secured financing of each of the ships on order for up to 80% of the contract ~~price of each ship on order.~~price. The remaining portion of the contract price of the ships ~~will~~is expected to be funded ~~with a~~through an existing €150.0 million bank facility and TUI Cruises’ cash flows from operations. The various ship construction and ~~credit~~financing agreements include certain restrictions on each of our and TUI AG’s ability to reduce our current ownership interest in TUI Cruises below 37.55% through 2021.

~~In March 2015,~~We have determined that RCHE, in which we ~~announced~~have a 49% noncontrolling interest, is a VIE for which we are not the ~~pending~~primary beneficiary, as we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance. Accordingly, subsequent to the sale of ~~Splendour~~our 51% interest in RCHE to Springwater Capital LLC ("Springwater"), we do not consolidate this entity and we account for this investment under the equity method of accounting. As of September 30, 2016, the net book value of our investment in RCHE was approximately $25.0 million, consisting of reimbursement commitments from several RCHE subsidiaries to RCL for fuel hedge costs related to Pullmantur and CDF through the closing date and as a condition of the ~~Seas~~sale. The amount is payable through 2019 and is 51% guaranteed by Springwater. This amount was included within Trade and Other Receivables and Other assets in our consolidated balance sheets and represents our maximum exposure to ~~TUI Cruises. The sale for €188.0 million is scheduled~~loss related to ~~be completed~~our investment in ~~April 2016 in order to retain the future revenues to be generated for sailings through that date. After~~RCHE.

In conjunction with the sale, ~~TUI Cruises will lease~~we provided a non-revolving working capital facility to an RCHE subsidiary in the ~~ship~~amount of up to Thomson Cruises, which will operate the ship. The purchase price will be financed by us under a secured credit agreement to be repaid over 10 years. The resulting term loan will be 50% guaranteed by TUI AG and will be secured by a first mortgage€15.0 million or approximately $16.9 million based on the ~~ship. Interest~~exchange rate at September 30, 2016. Proceeds of the facility,

Table of Contents

which may be drawn through July 2018, will ~~accrue~~bear interest at the rate of ~~6.25%~~6.5% per ~~annum. We executed certain forward contracts to lock in~~annum and are payable through 2022. Springwater has guaranteed repayment of 51% of the oustanding amounts under the facility. As of September 30, 2016, no amounts had been drawn on this facility. See Note 1. General for further discussion on the sales ~~price of the ship at approximately $213 million. We expect to recognize a gain on the sale, which we do not expect will have a material effect to our consolidated financial statements.~~transaction.

We have determined that Grand Bahama Shipyard Ltd. (“Grand Bahama”), a ship repair and maintenance facility in which we have a 40% noncontrolling interest, is a VIE. ~~The~~This facility serves cruise and cargo ships, oil and gas tankers and offshore units. We utilize this facility, among other ship repair facilities, for our regularly scheduled drydocks and certain emergency repairs as may be required. During the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2016, we made payments of $2.6 million and $36.0 million, respectively, to Grand Bahama for ship repair and maintenance services. We have determined that we are not the primary beneficiary of this facility as we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the facility’s economic performance. Accordingly, we do not consolidate this entity and we account for this investment under the equity method of accounting. As of September 30, 2016, the net book value of our investment in Grand Bahama was approximately $45.7 million, consisting of $21.9 million in equity and a loan of $23.8 million. As of December 31, 2015, the net book value of our investment in Grand Bahama was approximately ~~$52.7~~$51.2 million, consisting of ~~$12.5~~$12.6 million in equity and ~~$40.2 million in loans. As~~a loan of ~~December 31, 2014, the net book value of our investment in Grand Bahama was approximately $53.8 million, consisting of $7.7 million in equity and $46.1 million in loans.~~$38.6 million. These amounts represent our maximum exposure to ~~loss. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, we received approximately $3.1 million and $3.6 million, respectively, in principal and interest payments~~loss related to ~~a loan that is~~our investment in ~~accrual status from~~Grand Bahama. Our debt agreement with Grand Bahama ~~which~~ was ~~paid in full~~amended during the quarter ended ~~June 30, 2015.~~March 31, 2016 to extend the maturity by 10 years and increase the applicable interest rate to the lower of (i) LIBOR plus 3.50% and (ii) 5.5%. Interest payable on the loan is due on a semi-annual basis. We continue to classify the loan, as modified, as non-accrual status. The ~~remaining amount of our~~ loan ~~to Grand Bahama is in non-accrual status and~~balance is included within Other assets in our consolidated balance ~~sheets for which we received payments of approximately $2.8 million during~~sheets. During the quarter ended September 30, ~~, 2015.~~2016, no principal payments were made. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016 we received principal payments of approximately $14.8 million. We monitor credit risk associated with ~~this~~the loan through our participation on Grand Bahama’s board of directors along with our review of Grand Bahama’s financial statements and projected cash flows. Based on this review, we believe the risk of loss associated with the outstanding loan is not probable as of September 30, ~~2015.~~2016.

We have determined that Skysea Holding International Ltd. ("Skysea Holding"), in which we have a 35% noncontrolling interest, is a VIE for which we are not the primary beneficiary, as we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance. Accordingly, we do not consolidate this entity and we account for this investment under the equity method of accounting. In ~~addition,~~December 2014, we and Ctrip.com International Ltd, which also owns 35% of Skysea Holding, each provided a debt facility to a wholly owned subsidiary of Skysea Holding in the amount of $80.0 million. Interest under these facilities, which mature in January 2030, initially accrues at a rate of 3.0% per annum with an increase of at least 0.5% every two years through maturity. The facilities, which are pari passu to each other, are each 100% guaranteed by Skysea Holding and are secured by a first priority ~~mortgage~~mortgages on the ship, Golden ~~Era~~Era. ~~, formerly known as~~ ~~Celebrity Century, which~~In September 2016, we ~~sold~~and Ctrip.com International Ltd each provided an additional debt facility to ~~a wholly owned subsidiary of~~ Skysea Holding in ~~September 2014.~~the amount of up to $3.8 million. Interest under these facilities, which mature in December 2016, accrues at a rate of 3.0% per annum. As of September 30, ~~2015 and December 31, 2014,~~2016, the net book value of our investment in Skysea Holding and its subsidiaries ~~including~~was approximately $95.5 million, consisting of $11.2 million in equity and loans of $84.3 million. As of December 31, 2015, the net book value of our investment in Skysea Holding and its subsidiaries was approximately ~~$101.6~~$99.8 million, consisting of $17.3 million in equity and ~~$106.3 million, respectively. This amount was~~a loan of $82.4 million. The majority of these amounts were included within Other assets in our consolidated balance ~~sheets. Our investment amount is substantially~~sheets and represent our maximum exposure to ~~loss. During the quarter ended June 30, 2015,~~loss related to our investment in Skysea ~~Holding and its subsidiaries commenced operations through the brand SkySea Cruises.~~Holding.

~~Our share of income from~~The following table sets forth information regarding our investments accounted for under the equity method of accounting, including the entities discussed above, was $38.4 million and $25.7 million for the quarters ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, respectively, and $62.2 million and $34.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, respectively, and was recorded(in thousands):



	Quarter Ended September 30, 2016		Quarter Ended September 30, 2015		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
Share of equity income from investments ⁽¹⁾	$	46,539	$	38,359	$	94,832	$	62,183
Dividends received	$	47,491	$	1,347	$	71,370	$	5,327

⁽¹⁾Our share of equity income from investments are reported within Other income.in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) and Other, net within Operating Activitiesin our consolidated statements of cash flows.

Table of Contents

We also provide ship management services to TUI Cruises GmbH, RCHE and Skysea Holding. Additionally, we bareboat charter to Pullmantur the vessels currently operated by its brands, which were retained by us. We recorded the following as it relates to these services in our operating results within our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) (in thousands):



	Quarter Ended September 30, 2016	Quarter Ended September 30, 2015	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
Revenues	$9,300	$3,940	$17,888	$15,557
Expenses	$2,410	$2,606	$8,930	$12,149

Note 6. Long-Term Debt

In February 2016, we amended our unsecured term loans for Oasis of the Seas and Allure of the Seas to reduce the margins on those facilities and incorporate certain covenant improvements included in our more recent credit facilities. The interest rate on both the $420.0 million floating rate tranche of the Oasis of the Seas term loan and the $1.1 billion Allure of the Seas term loan was reduced from LIBOR plus 1.85% to LIBOR plus 1.65%. These amendments did not result in the extinguishment of debt.

In February 2016, we agreed with the lenders on our €365.0 million unsecured term loan due 2017 to convert €247.5 million, or $273.2 million, of the outstanding principal balance from Euro to US dollars. Interest on the new US dollar tranche accrues at a floating rate based on LIBOR plus the applicable margin. The balance of the facility of €117.5 million will remain outstanding in Euro and will continue to accrue interest at a floating rate based on EURIBOR, subject to a 0% floor, plus the applicable margin. The applicable margin varies with our debt rating and was 1.75% as of September 30, 2016. The amendment did not result in the extinguishment of debt.

In April ~~2015,~~2016, we took delivery of ~~Anthem~~Ovation of the Seas. To finance the purchase, we borrowed ~~$742.1~~$841.8 million under a previously committed unsecured term loan which is 95% guaranteed by Euler Hermes Deutschland AG ("Hermes"), the official export credit agency of Germany. The loan amortizes semi-annually over 12 years and bears interest at LIBOR plus a margin of ~~1.30%~~1.00%, totaling ~~1.71%~~1.91% as of September 30, ~~2015. Refer~~2016. During 2015, we entered into forward-starting interest rate swap agreements which effectively converted $830.0 million of the loan from the floating rate available to us per the credit agreement to a fixed rate, including the applicable margin, of 3.16% effective from April 2016 through the maturity of the loan. See Note 10. Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments for further information regarding these agreements.

In April 2016, we entered into and drew in full on a credit agreement which provides an unsecured term loan in the amount of $200 million. The loan is due and payable at maturity in April 2017. Interest on the loan accrues at a floating rate based on LIBOR plus a margin of 1.30%, totaling 1.82% as of September 30, 2016. The proceeds from this loan were used to repay amounts outstanding under our unsecured revolving credit facilities.

In May 2016, we took delivery of Harmony of the Seas. To finance the purchase, we borrowed an unsecured Euro-denominated term loan in the amount of €700.7 million, or $787.2 million based on the exchange rate at September 30, 2016, and an unsecured US dollar-denominated term loan in the amount of $226.1 million under previously committed credit agreements. Both of the facilities are 100% guaranteed by Compagnie Francaise d’Assurance pour le Commerce Extérieur (“COFACE”), the official export credit agency of France. The Euro-denominated term loan amortizes semi-annually over 12 years and bears interest at EURIBOR, subject to a 0% floor, plus the applicable margin of 1.15%, totaling 1.15% as of September 30, 2016. The US dollar-denominated term loan amortizes semi-annually over 12 years and bears interest at a fixed rate of 2.53%. During 2015, we entered into forward-starting interest rate swap agreements ~~related~~which effectively converted €693.4 million, or $779.0 million based on the exchange rate at September 30, 2016, of the Euro-denominated term loan from the floating rate per the credit agreement to ~~this loan.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~In June 2015, we amended and restated our $1.1 billion unsecured revolving credit facility due July 2016. The amendment reduced~~a fixed rate, including the applicable margin, ~~and facility fee and extended~~of 2.26% effective from May 2016 through the termination date to June 2020. The applicable margin and facility fee vary with our debt rating and were 1.50% and 0.25%, respectively, as of September 30, 2015. We have the right to request an increase in the capacitymaturity of the ~~amended facility by an additional $300 million, subject to the receipt of additional or increased lender commitments,~~loan. See Note 10. Fair Value Measurements and to extend the termination date by up to two years, subject to lender consent. Additionally, in July 2015, we amended our $1.2 billion unsecured revolving credit facility due August 2018 to reduce pricing in line with the amended pricing of the $1.1 billion unsecured revolving credit facility. These amendments did not result in the extinguishment of debt.Derivative Instruments for further information regarding these agreements.

In July 2015, we also amended our $380.0 million, €365.0 million, $290.0 million and $65.0 million unsecured term loans due at various dates from 2016 through 2019 to reduce the applicable margins. The margins are currently 1.75% for each loan based on our debt rating as of September 30, 2015. The termination date of the $290 million unsecured term loan was extended from February 2016 to February 2018. None of these amendments resulted in the extinguishment of debt.

In October 2015, we received increased lender commitments for our unsecured revolving credit facility due June 2020 in the amount of $300 million, bringing our total capacity under this facility to $1.4 billion.

Note 7. Commitments and Contingencies

Ship Purchase Obligations

As of September 30, 2016, the aggregate cost of our ships on firm order, not including the TUI Cruises' ships on order and those subject to conditions to effectiveness, was approximately $5.3 billion, of which we had deposited $282.0 million as of such date. Approximately 56.1% of the aggregate cost was exposed to fluctuations in the Euro exchange rate at September 30, 2016. Refer to Note 10. Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments for further information.

Table of Contents

In ~~January 2015,~~June 2016, we entered into ~~a financing arrangement~~credit agreements for the ~~US dollar~~unsecured financing of our first two "Project Edge" ships for up to 80% of each ship’s contract price through facilities to be guaranteed 100% by COFACE. The ships are expected to enter service in the fourth ~~Oasis-class ship. Through~~quarter of 2018 and the first half of 2020, respectively. Under these financing ~~arrangement,~~arrangements, we have the right, but not the obligation, to satisfy the obligations to be incurred upon delivery and acceptance of ~~the~~each vessel under the shipbuilding contract by assuming, at delivery and acceptance, the debt indirectly incurred by the shipbuilder during the construction of ~~the~~each ship. The maximum loan amount ~~assumed~~ under ~~this arrangement~~each facility is not to exceed the US dollar equivalent of ~~€931.2~~€622.6 million and €652.6 million, or approximately ~~$1.0 billion,~~$699.4 million and $733.1 million, respectively, based on the exchange rate at September 30, ~~2015.~~2016, for the first "Project Edge" ship delivery and the second "Project Edge" ship delivery, respectively. The ~~loan, if we were to elect assumption at the date of actual delivery,~~loans will amortize semi-annually and will mature 12 years following delivery of ~~the~~each ship. ~~At our election, interest~~Interest on the ~~loan~~loans will accrue ~~either (1)~~ at a fixed rate of ~~3.82% (inclusive of the applicable margin) or (2) at a floating rate equal to LIBOR plus 1.10%~~3.23%.

In ~~June 2015,~~September 2016, we ~~entered into an agreement~~signed conditional agreements with ~~Meyer Werft~~STX France to build ~~the fourth Quantum-class~~a fifth Oasis-class ship for Royal Caribbean International. We have also received a commitment for the unsecured financing of up to 80% of the ship’s contract price. Hermes has agreed to guarantee to the lenders payment of 95% of the financing. The ship will have a capacity of approximately 4,150 berths and is expected to ~~enter service~~be delivered in the second quarter of ~~2019.~~2021, and a third and fourth "Project Edge" ship expected to be delivered in the fourth quarter of each of 2021 and 2022. These agreements are contingent upon completion of conditions precedent, including financing.

In October ~~2015, our conditional agreements~~2016, we signed a memorandum of understanding with ~~STX France~~Meyer Turku to build two ships of a new generation of ~~Celebrity Cruises~~ ships for Royal Caribbean International, known as "Project Edge" became effective. We received commitments for the unsecured financing of the ships for up to 80% of the ship’s contract price through a facility to be guaranteed 100% by COFACE. The ships will each have a capacity of approximately 2,900 berths andIcon", which are expected to enter service in the ~~fourth quarter~~second quarters of ~~2018~~2022 and 2024, respectively. While the ~~first half~~design is still being finalized, each ship will likely accommodate approximately 5,000 guests. These orders are contingent upon completion of ~~2020, respectively.~~

~~As of September 30, 2015, the aggregate cost of our ships on order, not~~conditions precedent, including ~~the "Project Edge" ships~~documentation and the TUI Cruises' ships on order, was approximately $5.0 billion, of which we had deposited $449.8 million as of such date. Approximately 43.7% of the aggregate cost was exposed to fluctuations in the Euro exchange rate at September 30, 2015. Refer to Note 10. ~~Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments~~ ~~for further information.~~

~~Litigation~~financing.

As previously reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, a class action complaint was filed in June 2011 against Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on behalf of a purported class of stateroom attendants employed onboard Royal Caribbean International cruise vessels. The complaint alleged that the stateroom attendants were required to pay other crew members to help with their duties and that certain stateroom attendants were required to work back of house assignments without the ability to earn gratuities, in each case in violation of the U.S. Seaman’s Wage Act. In May 2012, the district court granted our motion to dismiss the complaint on the basis that the applicable collective bargaining agreement requires any such claims to be arbitrated. The United States Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit, affirmed the district court’s dismissal and denied the plaintiffs’ petition for re-hearing and re-hearing en banc. In October 2014, the United States Supreme Court denied the plaintiffs’ request to review the order compelling arbitration. Subsequently, approximately 575 crew members submitted demands for arbitration. The demands make substantially the same allegations as in the federal court complaint and are similarly seeking damages, wage penalties and interest in an indeterminate amount. Unlike the federal court complaint, the demands for arbitration are being brought individually by each of the crew members and not on behalf of a purported class of stateroom attendants. At this time, we are unable to estimate the possible impact of this matter on us. However, we believe the underlying claims made against us are without merit, and we intend to vigorously defend ourselves against them.Litigation

~~Table of Contents~~

In April 2015, the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation issued Notices of Violation to Royal Caribbean International and Celebrity Cruises seeking monetary penalties for alleged violations of the Alaska Marine Visible Emission Standards that occurred over the past five years on certain of our vessels. We believe we have meritorious defenses to the allegations and we are cooperating with the state of Alaska. We do not believe that the ultimate outcome of these claims will have a material adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations and cash flows.

We are routinely involved in other claims typical within the cruise vacation industry. The majority of these claims are covered by insurance. We believe the outcome of such claims, net of expected insurance recoveries, will not have a material adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations and cash flows.

Other

In July 2016, we executed an agreement with Miami Dade County (“MDC”), which was simultaneously assigned to Sumitomo Banking Corporation (“SMBC”), to lease land from MDC and construct a new cruise terminal at PortMiami in Miami, Florida. The terminal is expected to be approximately 170,000 square-feet and will serve as a homeport. During the construction period, SMBC will fund the costs of the terminal’s construction and land lease. Upon completion of the terminal's construction, we will operate and lease the terminal from SMBC for a five-year term. We determined that the lease arrangement between SMBC and us should be accounted for as an operating lease upon completion of the terminal.

If ~~(i)~~ any person ~~other than A. Wilhelmsen AS. and Cruise Associates and their respective affiliates (the “Applicable Group”)~~ acquires ownership of more than ~~33%~~50% of our common stock ~~and the Applicable Group owns less of our common stock than such person,~~ or, ~~(ii)~~ subject to certain exceptions, during any 24-month period, a majority of the Board is no longer comprised of individuals who were members of the Board on the first day of such period, we may be obligated to prepay indebtedness outstanding under our ~~ship financing~~credit facilities, which we may be unable to replace on similar terms. Our ~~other~~public debt ~~agreements~~securities also contain change of control provisions that would be triggered by ~~the~~a third-party acquisition of greater than 50% of our common stock ~~by (i) any person or (ii) in the case of our public debt securities, by a person other than a member of the Applicable Group~~ coupled with a ratings downgrade. If this were to occur, it would have an adverse impact on our liquidity and operations.

Note 8. Shareholders’ Equity

In September 2016, we declared a cash dividend on our common stock of $0.48 per share which was paid in October of 2016. During the first and second quarters of 2016, we declared and paid a cash dividend on our common stock of $0.375 per share. During the first quarter of 2016, we also paid a cash dividend on our common stock of $0.375 per share which was declared during the fourth quarter of 2015.

During the third quarter of 2015, we declared a cash dividend on our common stock of $0.375 per share which was paid in ~~the fourth quarter~~October of 2015. During the first and second quarters of 2015, we declared and paid a cash dividend on our common stock of $0.30 per share. During the first quarter of 2015, we also paid a cash dividend on our common stock of $0.30 per share which was declared during the fourth quarter of 2014.

~~During the third quarter~~

Table of 2014, we declared a cash dividend on our common stock of $0.30 per share which was paid in the fourth quarter of 2014. During the first and second quarters of 2014, we declared and paid a cash dividend on our common stock of $0.25 per share. During the first quarter of 2014, we also paid a cash dividend on our common stock of $0.25 per share which was declared during the fourth quarter of 2013.Contents

In October 2015, our board of directors authorized a common stock repurchase program for up to $500 ~~million. The timing~~million that was completed in August 2016. During the first, second and ~~number~~third quarters of 2016, we purchased 2.8 million, 0.6 million and 0.7 million shares, purchased will depend on a variety of factors including price and market conditions. Repurchases under the program are expected to be funded from available cash or borrowings under our revolving credit facilities. On October 23, 2015, we executed an agreement with an investment bank to purchaserespectively, for a total of ~~$200~~$200.0 million, $50.0 million and $50.0 million, respectively, in open market transactions. These transactions were recorded within Treasury stock in our consolidated balance sheet. Our repurchases under this program, including the $200.0 million of ~~the $500 million authorized amount, of our common~~ stock ~~under an accelerated stock repurchase (ASR) transaction. Under the terms of the ASR agreement, we will receive upfront the majority of the shares of our common stock to be~~ repurchased based on current market prices in exchange for a prepayment of $200 million. The final number of shares to be repurchased will be determined upon settlement based on the average of the daily volume-weighted average prices of our common stock during the ~~term~~fourth quarter of the transaction, less a discount (the "Final Repurchase Price"). Upon final settlement, which is expected no later than the end of January 2016, and depending on the Final Repurchase Price, the investment bank may be required to deliver additional shares of common stock to us or we may be required to deliver shares of common stock or to make a cash payment, at our election, to the investment bank. The initial shares received upon prepayment and incremental shares received at maturity, if any, will be recorded in ~~Shareholders’ equity~~ upon delivery, based on the current market price of our common stock. Future stock repurchase transactions could include open market purchases or additional accelerated share repurchases. We expect to complete the program by the end of 2016.2015, totaled $500.0 million.

Note 9. Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The following table presents the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015 (in thousands):

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
Changes
related to
cash flow
derivative
hedges Changes in
defined
benefit plans Foreign
currency
translation
adjustments Accumulated other
comprehensive loss Changes
related to
cash flow
derivative
hedges Changes in
defined
benefit plans Foreign
currency
translation
adjustments Accumulated other
comprehensive loss
Accumulated comprehensive (loss) income at beginning of the year $ (826,026 ) $ (31,207 ) $ (39,761 ) $ (896,994 ) $ 43,324
$ (23,994 ) $ (13,659 ) $ 5,671
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications (483,946 ) 4,213
(23,994 ) (503,727 ) (339,415 ) (6,829 ) (19,842 ) (366,086 )
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income 202,978
1,354
—
204,332
16,236
1,293
1,997
19,526
Net current-period other comprehensive (loss) income (280,968 ) 5,567
(23,994 ) (299,395 ) (323,179 ) (5,536 ) (17,845 ) (346,560 )
Ending balance $ (1,106,994 ) $ (25,640 ) $ (63,755 ) $ (1,196,389 ) $ (279,855 ) $ (29,530 ) $ (31,504 ) $ (340,889 )



	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016												Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
	Changes related to cash flow derivative hedges			Changes in defined benefit plans			Foreign currency translation adjustments			Accumulated other comprehensive loss			Changes related to cash flow derivative hedges			Changes in defined benefit plans			Foreign currency translation adjustments			Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Accumulated comprehensive loss at beginning of the year	$	(1,232,073	)	$	(26,447	)	$	(69,913	)	$	(1,328,433	)	$	(826,026	)	$	(31,207	)	$	(39,761	)	$	(896,994	)
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications	(9,150		)	(13,521		)	8,423			(14,248		)	(483,946		)	4,213			(23,994		)	(503,727		)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss	263,774			1,373			—			265,147			202,978			1,354			—			204,332
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)	254,624			(12,148		)	8,423			250,899			(280,968		)	5,567			(23,994		)	(299,395		)
Ending balance	$	(977,449	)	$	(38,595	)	$	(61,490	)	$	(1,077,534	)	$	(1,106,994	)	$	(25,640	)	$	(63,755	)	$	(1,196,389	)

The following table presents reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the ~~quarter~~quarters and nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015 (in thousands):


	Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) into Income													Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) into Income
Details About Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Components	Quarter Ended September 30, 2015			Quarter Ended September 30, 2014			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014			Affected Line Item in Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)	Quarter Ended September 30, 2016			Quarter Ended September 30, 2015			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015			Affected Line Item in Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(Loss) gain on cash flow derivative hedges:
Cross currency swaps	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	(261	)	Interest expense, net of interest capitalized
Interest rate swaps	(10,276		)	(3,106		)	(27,024		)	(9,312		)	Interest expense, net of interest capitalized	$	(11,953	)	$	(10,276	)	$	(32,019	)	$	(27,024	)	Interest expense, net of interest capitalized
Foreign currency forward contracts	(752		)	(450		)	(2,153		)	(1,348		)	Depreciation and amortization expenses	(2,710		)	(752		)	(5,408		)	(2,153		)	Depreciation and amortization expenses
Foreign currency forward contracts	(239		)	(238		)	(715		)	(4,052		)	Other income	(3,465		)	(239		)	(10,206		)	(715		)	Other income
Foreign currency forward contracts	—			—			—			(57		)	Interest expense, net of interest capitalized	—			—			(207		)	—			Other operating
Foreign currency collar options	(568		)	—			(1,003		)	—			Depreciation and amortization expenses	(601		)	(568		)	(1,806		)	(1,003		)	Depreciation and amortization expenses
Fuel swaps	(65,975		)	(1,996		)	(172,083		)	(1,206		)	Fuel	2,760			—			9,356			—			Other income
Fuel swaps														(64,654		)	(65,975		)	(223,484		)	(172,083		)	Fuel
	(77,810		)	(5,790		)	(202,978		)	(16,236		)		(80,623		)	(77,810		)	(263,774		)	(202,978		)
Amortization of defined benefit plans:
Actuarial loss	(354		)	(222		)	(1,061		)	(666		)	Payroll and related	(285		)	(354		)	(1,373		)	(1,061		)	Payroll and related
Prior service costs	—			(209		)	(293		)	(627		)	Payroll and related	—			—			—			(293		)	Payroll and related
	(354		)	(431		)	(1,354		)	(1,293		)		(285		)	(354		)	(1,373		)	(1,354		)
Release of foreign cumulative translation due to sale of Pullmantur's non-core businesses:
Foreign cumulative translation	—			—			—			(1,997		)	Other operating
Total reclassifications for the period	$	(78,164	)	$	(6,221	)	$	(204,332	)	$	(19,526	)		$	(80,908	)	$	(78,164	)	$	(265,147	)	$	(204,332	)

Table of Contents

Note 10. Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments

Fair Value Measurements

The estimated fair value of our financial instruments that are not measured at fair value, categorized based upon the fair value hierarchy, are as follows (in thousands):


	Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2015 Using										Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2014 Using										Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2016 Using										Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2015 Using
Description	Total Carrying Amount		Total Fair Value		Level 1⁽¹⁾		Level 2⁽²⁾		Level 3⁽³⁾		Total Carrying Amount		Total Fair Value		Level 1⁽¹⁾		Level 2⁽²⁾		Level 3⁽³⁾		Total Carrying Amount		Total Fair Value		Level 1⁽¹⁾		Level 2⁽²⁾		Level 3⁽³⁾		Total Carrying Amount		Total Fair Value		Level 1⁽¹⁾		Level 2⁽²⁾		Level 3⁽³⁾
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents⁽⁴⁾	$	147,419	$	147,419	$	147,419	$	—	$	—	$	189,241	$	189,241	$	189,241	$	—	$	—	$	178,428	$	178,428	$	178,428	$	—	$	—	$	121,565	$	121,565	$	121,565	$	—	$	—
Total Assets	$	147,419	$	147,419	$	147,419	$	—	$	—	$	189,241	$	189,241	$	189,241	$	—	$	—	$	178,428	$	178,428	$	178,428	$	—	$	—	$	121,565	$	121,565	$	121,565	$	—	$	—
Liabilities:
Long-term debt (including current portion of long-term debt)⁽⁵⁾	$	8,438,804	$	8,732,461	$	1,556,756	$	7,175,705	$	—	$	8,391,301	$	8,761,414	$	1,859,361	$	6,902,053	$	—	$	9,675,483	$	10,225,707	$	1,232,284	$	8,993,423	$	—	$	8,478,473	$	8,895,009	$	1,536,629	$	7,358,380	$	—
Total Liabilities	$	8,438,804	$	8,732,461	$	1,556,756	$	7,175,705	$	—	$	8,391,301	$	8,761,414	$	1,859,361	$	6,902,053	$	—	$	9,675,483	$	10,225,707	$	1,232,284	$	8,993,423	$	—	$	8,478,473	$	8,895,009	$	1,536,629	$	7,358,380	$	—

(1) Inputs based on quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access. Valuation of these items does not entail a significant amount of judgment.

(2) Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the liability, either directly or indirectly. For unsecured revolving credit facilities and unsecured term loans, fair value is determined utilizing the income valuation approach. This valuation model takes into account the contract terms of our debt such as the debt maturity and the interest rate on the debt. The valuation model also takes into account the creditworthiness of the Company.

(3) Inputs that are unobservable. The Company did not use any Level 3 inputs as of September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and December 31, ~~2014.~~2015.

(4) Consists of cash and marketable securities with original maturities of less than 90 days.

(5) Consists of unsecured revolving credit facilities, senior notes, senior debentures and term loans. Does not include our capital lease obligations.

Other Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts of accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued interest and accrued expenses approximate fair value at September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and December 31, ~~2014.~~2015.

Table of Contents

Assets and liabilities that are recorded at fair value have been categorized based upon the fair value hierarchy. The following table presents information about the Company’s financial instruments recorded at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):


	Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2015 Using								Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2014 Using								Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2016 Using								Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2015 Using
Description	Total		Level 1⁽¹⁾		Level 2⁽²⁾		Level 3⁽³⁾		Total		Level 1⁽¹⁾		Level 2⁽²⁾		Level 3⁽³⁾		Total		Level 1⁽¹⁾		Level 2⁽²⁾		Level 3⁽³⁾		Total		Level 1⁽¹⁾		Level 2⁽²⁾		Level 3⁽³⁾
Assets:
Derivative financial instruments⁽⁴⁾	$	113,279	$	—	$	113,279	$	—	$	63,981	$	—	$	63,981	$	—	$	36,697	$	—	$	36,697	$	—	$	134,574	$	—	$	134,574	$	—
Investments⁽⁵⁾	$	3,884	3,884		—		—		$	5,531	5,531		—		—		$	3,669	3,669		—		—		$	3,965	3,965		—		—
Total Assets	$	117,163	$	3,884	$	113,279	$	—	$	69,512	$	5,531	$	63,981	$	—	$	40,366	$	3,669	$	36,697	$	—	$	138,539	$	3,965	$	134,574	$	—
Liabilities:
Derivative financial instruments⁽⁶⁾	$	925,202	$	—	$	925,202	$	—	$	767,635	$	—	$	767,635	$	—	$	507,202	$	—	$	507,202	$	—	$	1,044,292	$	—	$	1,044,292	$	—
Total Liabilities	$	925,202	$	—	$	925,202	$	—	$	767,635	$	—	$	767,635	$	—	$	507,202	$	—	$	507,202	$	—	$	1,044,292	$	—	$	1,044,292	$	—

~~Table of Contents~~

(2) Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. For foreign currency forward contracts, interest rate swaps, cross currency swaps and fuel swaps, fair value is derived using valuation models that utilize the income valuation approach. These valuation models take into account the contract terms, such as maturity, as well as other inputs, such as foreign exchange rates and curves, fuel types, fuel curves and interest rate yield curves. Fair value for foreign currency collar options is determined by using standard option pricing models with inputs based on the options’ contract terms, such as exercise price and maturity, and readily available public market data, such as foreign exchange curves, foreign exchange volatility levels and discount rates. All derivative instrument fair values take into account the creditworthiness of the counterparty and the Company.

(3) Inputs that are unobservable. The Company did not use any Level 3 inputs as of September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and December 31, ~~2014.~~2015.

(4) Consists of foreign currency forward contracts, interest rate swaps and fuel swaps. Please refer to the “Fair Value of Derivative Instruments” table for breakdown by instrument type.

(5) Consists of exchange-traded equity securities and mutual ~~funds.~~funds reported within Other assets in our consolidated balance sheets.

(6) Consists of foreign currency forward contracts, ~~foreign currency collar options,~~ interest rate swaps and fuel swaps. Please refer to the “Fair Value of Derivative Instruments” table for breakdown by instrument type.

The reported fair values are based on a variety of factors and assumptions. Accordingly, the fair values may not represent actual values of the financial instruments that could have been realized as of September 30, ~~2015~~2016 or December 31, ~~2014,~~2015, or that will be realized in the future, and do not include expenses that could be incurred in an actual sale or settlement.

The following table presents information about the Company’s goodwill, indefinite-life intangible assets and long-lived assets for our Pullmantur reporting unit recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis (in thousands):

Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2015 Using
Description Total Carrying Amount Total Fair Value Level 3 Total Impairment
Pullmantur Goodwill ⁽¹⁾
—
—
—
123,814
Indefinite-life intangible asset—Pullmantur trademarks and trade names ⁽²⁾
—
—
—
174,285
Long-lived assets—Pullmantur aircraft and vessels ⁽³⁾
147,900
147,900
147,900
113,168
Total 147,900
147,900
147,900
411,267

(1) We estimated the fair value of the Pullmantur reporting unit using a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model. The principal assumptions used in the discounted cash flow model are projected operating results, weighted-average cost of capital and terminal value. Significantly impacting these assumptions was the decision to reduce the size of Pullmantur's fleet. The discounted cash flow model used our 2016 projected operating results as a base. To that base we added future years’ cash flows through 2020 assuming multiple revenue and expense scenarios that reflect the impact of different global economic environments for this period on Pullmantur’s reporting unit. We assigned a probability to each revenue and expense scenario. We discounted the projected cash flows using rates specific to Pullmantur’s reporting unit based on its weighted-average cost of capital, which was determined to be 11%.

(2) We estimated the fair value of our indefinite-life intangible asset using a discounted cash flow model and the relief-from-royalty method. These trademarks and trade names relate to Pullmantur and we have used a discount rate of 11.5%, comparable to the rate used in valuing the Pullmantur reporting unit.

(3) We estimated the fair value of our long-lived assets using the market approach for the aircraft and a blended indication from the cost and market approaches for the vessels. A significant input in performing the fair value assessments for these assets was comparable market transactions.

We have master International Swaps and Derivatives Association (“ISDA”) agreements in place with our derivative instrument counterparties. These ISDA agreements provide for final close out netting with our counterparties for all positions in the case of default or termination of the ISDA agreement. We have determined that our ISDA agreements provide us with rights of setoff on the fair value of derivative instruments in a gain position and those in a loss position with the same counterparty. We have elected not to offset such derivative instrument fair values in our consolidated balance sheets.

As of September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and December 31, ~~2014,~~2015, no cash collateral was received or pledged under our ISDA agreements. See Credit Related Contingent Features for further discussion on contingent collateral requirements for our derivative instruments.

Table of Contents

The following table presents information about the Company’s offsetting of financial assets under master netting agreements with derivative counterparties:


	Gross Amounts not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet that are Subject to Master Netting Agreements																		Gross Amounts not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet that are Subject to Master Netting Agreements
	As of September 30, 2015									As of December 31, 2014									As of September 30, 2016									As of December 31, 2015
	Gross Amount of Derivative Assets Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet		Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting Recognized Derivative Liabilities			Cash Collateral Received		Net Amount of Derivative Assets		Gross Amount of Derivative Assets Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet		Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting Recognized Derivative Assets			Cash Collateral Received		Net Amount of Derivative Assets		Gross Amount of Derivative Assets Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet		Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting Recognized Derivative Liabilities			Cash Collateral Received		Net Amount of Derivative Assets		Gross Amount of Derivative Assets Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet		Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting Recognized Derivative Assets			Cash Collateral Received		Net Amount of Derivative Assets
(In thousands)
Derivatives subject to master netting agreements	$	113,279	$	(112,567	)	$	—	$	712	$	63,981	$	(63,981	)	$	—	$	—	$	36,697	$	(34,517	)	$	—	$	2,180	$	134,574	$	(129,815	)	$	—	$	4,759
Total	$	113,279	$	(112,567	)	$	—	$	712	$	63,981	$	(63,981	)	$	—	$	—	$	36,697	$	(34,517	)	$	—	$	2,180	$	134,574	$	(129,815	)	$	—	$	4,759

The following table presents information about the Company’s offsetting of financial liabilities under master netting agreements with derivative counterparties:


	Gross Amounts not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet that are Subject to Master Netting Agreements																				Gross Amounts not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet that are Subject to Master Netting Agreements
	As of September 30, 2015										As of December 31, 2014										As of September 30, 2016										As of December 31, 2015
	Gross Amount of Derivative Liabilities Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet			Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting Recognized Derivative Assets		Cash Collateral Pledged		Net Amount of Derivative Liabilities			Gross Amount of Derivative Liabilities Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet			Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting Recognized Derivative Liabilities		Cash Collateral Pledged		Net Amount of Derivative Liabilities			Gross Amount of Derivative Liabilities Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet			Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting Recognized Derivative Assets		Cash Collateral Pledged		Net Amount of Derivative Liabilities			Gross Amount of Derivative Liabilities Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet			Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting Recognized Derivative Liabilities		Cash Collateral Pledged		Net Amount of Derivative Liabilities
(In thousands)
Derivatives subject to master netting agreements	$	(925,202	)	$	112,567	$	—	$	(812,635	)	$	(767,635	)	$	63,981	$	—	$	(703,654	)	$	(507,202	)	$	34,517	$	—	$	(472,685	)	$	(1,044,292	)	$	129,815	$	—	$	(914,477	)
Total	$	(925,202	)	$	112,567	$	—	$	(812,635	)	$	(767,635	)	$	63,981	$	—	$	(703,654	)	$	(507,202	)	$	34,517	$	—	$	(472,685	)	$	(1,044,292	)	$	129,815	$	—	$	(914,477	)

Concentrations of Credit Risk

We monitor our credit risk associated with financial and other institutions with which we conduct significant business and, to minimize these risks, we select counterparties with credit risks acceptable to us and we seek to limit our exposure to an individual counterparty. Credit risk, including but not limited to counterparty nonperformance under derivative instruments, our credit facilities and new ship progress payment guarantees, is not considered significant, as we primarily conduct business with large, well-established financial institutions, insurance companies and export credit agencies many of which we have long-term relationships with and which have credit risks acceptable to us or where the credit risk is spread out among a large number of counterparties. As of September 30, ~~2015, our~~2016, we had counterparty credit risk exposure under our derivative instruments of approximately $2.3 million, which was ~~approximately $0.7 million.~~limited to the cost of replacing the contracts in the event of non-performance by the counterparties to the contracts, the majority of which are currently our lending banks. As of December 31, ~~2014,~~2015, we ~~did not have any~~had counterparty credit risk exposure under our derivative ~~instruments.~~instruments of approximately $4.8 million, which was limited to the cost of replacing the contracts in the event of non-performance by the counterparties to the contracts, the majority of which are currently our lending banks. We do not anticipate nonperformance by any of our significant counterparties. In addition, we have established guidelines we follow regarding credit ratings and instrument maturities to maintain safety and liquidity. We do not normally require collateral or other security to support credit relationships; however, in certain circumstances this option is available to us.

Table of Contents

Derivative Instruments

We are exposed to market risk attributable to changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and fuel prices. We manage these risks through a combination of our normal operating and financing activities and through the use of derivative financial instruments pursuant to our

~~Table of Contents~~

hedging practices and policies. The financial impact of these hedging instruments is primarily offset by corresponding changes in the underlying exposures being hedged. We achieve this by closely matching the notional amount, term and conditions of the derivative instrument with the underlying risk being hedged. Although certain of our derivative financial instruments do not qualify or are not accounted for under hedge accounting, we do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes. We monitor our derivative positions using techniques including market valuations and sensitivity analyses.

We enter into various forward, swap and option contracts to manage our interest rate exposure and to limit our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and fuel prices. These instruments are recorded on the balance sheet at their fair value and the vast majority are designated as hedges. We also ~~have~~use non-derivative financial instruments designated as hedges of our net investment in our foreign operations and investments.

At inception of the hedge relationship, a derivative instrument that hedges the exposure to changes in the fair value of a firm commitment or a recognized asset or liability is designated as a fair value hedge. A derivative instrument that hedges a forecasted transaction or the variability of cash flows related to a recognized asset or liability is designated as a cash flow hedge.

Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated as fair value hedges are offset against changes in the fair value of the underlying hedged assets, liabilities or firm commitments. Gains and losses on derivatives that are designated as cash flow hedges are recorded as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss until the underlying hedged transactions are recognized in earnings. The foreign currency transaction gain or loss of our non-derivative financial instruments and the changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as hedges of our net investment in foreign operations and investments are recognized as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss along with the associated foreign currency translation adjustment of the foreign operation.

On an ongoing basis, we assess whether derivatives used in hedging transactions are “highly effective” in offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flow of hedged items. We use the long-haul method to assess hedge effectiveness using regression analysis for each hedge relationship under our interest rate, foreign currency and fuel hedging programs. We apply the same methodology on a consistent basis for assessing hedge effectiveness to all hedges within each hedging program (i.e. interest rate, foreign currency and fuel). We perform regression analyses over an observation period of up to three years, utilizing market data relevant to the hedge horizon of each hedge relationship. High effectiveness is achieved when a statistically valid relationship reflects a high degree of offset and correlation between the changes in the fair values of the derivative instrument and the hedged item. The determination of ineffectiveness is based on the amount of dollar offset between the change in fair value of the derivative instrument and the change in fair value of the hedged item at the end of the reporting period. If it is determined that a derivative is not highly effective as a hedge or hedge accounting is discontinued, any change in fair value of the derivative since the last date at which it was determined to be effective is recognized in earnings. In addition, the ineffective portion of our highly effective hedges is immediately recognized in earnings and reported in Other income in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).

Cash flows from derivative instruments that are designated as fair value or cash flow hedges are classified in the same category as the cash flows from the underlying hedged items. In the event that hedge accounting is discontinued, cash flows subsequent to the date of discontinuance are classified within investing activities. Cash flows from derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments are classified as investing activities.

We consider the classification of the underlying hedged item’s cash flows in determining the classification for the designated derivative instrument’s cash flows. We classify derivative instrument cash flows from hedges of benchmark interest rate or hedges of fuel expense as operating activities due to the nature of the hedged item. Likewise, we classify derivative instrument cash flows from hedges of foreign currency risk on our newbuild ship payments as investing activities and derivative instrument cash flows from hedges of foreign currency risk on debt payments as financing activities.

Interest Rate Risk

Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates to our long-term debt obligations including future interest payments. At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, approximately ~~33.0%~~41.4% and 31.2%, respectively, of our long-term debt was effectively ~~fixed as compared to 28.5% as of December 31, 2014.~~fixed. We use interest rate swap agreements to modify our exposure to interest rate movements and to manage our interest expense.

Table of Contents

Market risk associated with our long-term fixed rate debt is the potential increase in fair value resulting from a decrease in interest rates. We use interest rate swap agreements that effectively convert a portion of our fixed-rate debt to a floating-rate basis to manage this risk. At September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and December 31, ~~2014,~~2015, we maintained interest rate swap agreements on the ~~$420.0 million fixed rate portion of our~~ ~~Oasis of the Seas~~ ~~unsecured amortizing term loan and on the $650.0 million unsecured senior notes due 2022. The interest rate swap agreements on~~ ~~Oasis of the Seas~~following fixed-rate debt effectively changed the interest rate on the balance of the unsecured term loan, which was $227.5 million as of September 30, 2015, from a fixed rate of 5.41% to a LIBOR-based floating rate equal to LIBOR plus 3.87%, currently approximately 4.28%. The interest rate swap agreements on the $650.0 million unsecured senior notes effectively changed the interest rate of the unsecured senior notes from a fixed rate ofinstruments:



Debt Instrument	Swap Notional as of September 30, 2016 (In thousands)		Maturity	Debt Fixed Rate	Swap Floating Rate: LIBOR plus	All-in Swap Floating Rate as of September 30, 2016
Oasis of the Seas term loan	$	192,500	October 2021	5.41%	3.87%	4.78%
Unsecured senior notes	650,000		November 2022	5.25%	3.63%	4.45%
	$	842,500

~~Table of Contents~~

~~5.25% to a LIBOR-based floating rate equal to LIBOR plus 3.63%, currently approximately 3.95%.~~ These interest rate swap agreements are accounted for as fair value hedges.

Market risk associated with our long-term floating rate debt is the potential increase in interest expense from an increase in interest rates. We use interest rate swap agreements that effectively convert a portion of our floating-rate debt to a fixed-rate basis to manage this risk. ~~In May~~At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we ~~entered into forward-starting~~maintained interest rate swap agreements ~~that hedge~~on the ~~anticipated unsecured amortizing~~following floating-rate debt instruments:



Debt Instrument	Swap Notional as of September 30, 2016 (In thousands)		Maturity	Debt Floating Rate		All-in Swap Fixed Rate
Celebrity Reflection term loan	$	463,604	October 2024	LIBOR plus	0.40%	2.85%
Quantum of the Seas term loan	643,125		October 2026	LIBOR plus	1.30%	3.74%
Anthem of the Seas term loan	664,583		April 2027	LIBOR plus	1.30%	3.86%
Ovation of the Seas term loan	830,000		April 2028	LIBOR plus	1.00%	3.16%
Harmony of the Seas term loan ⁽¹⁾	778,966		May 2028	EURIBOR plus	1.15%	2.26%
	$	3,380,278

⁽¹⁾Interest rate swap agreements hedging the Euro-denominated term loan ~~that will finance a portion of our purchase of~~for Harmony of the Seas~~. Forward-starting interest rate swaps hedging~~ include EURIBOR zero-floors matching the ~~Harmony of the Seas~~ ~~loan will effectively convert the interest rate for €693.4 million, or approximately $774.2 million~~hedged debt EURIBOR zero-floor. Amount presented is based on the exchange rate atas of September 30, ~~2015, of the anticipated loan balance from EURIBOR plus 1.15% to a fixed rate of 2.26% (inclusive of margin) beginning in May~~ 2016. ~~In September 2015, we entered into forward-starting interest rate swap agreements that hedge the anticipated unsecured amortizing term loan that will finance our purchase of~~ ~~Ovation of the Seas. Forward-starting interest rate swaps hedging the~~ ~~Ovation of the Seas~~ ~~loan will effectively convert the interest rate for $830.0 million of the anticipated loan balance from LIBOR plus 1.00% to a fixed rate of 3.16% (inclusive of margin) beginning in April 2016.~~

These interest rate swap agreements are accounted for as cash flow hedges.

~~In addition, at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we maintained interest rate swap agreements on our~~ ~~Celebrity Reflection~~ ~~term loan. Our interest rate swap agreements effectively converted the interest rate on a portion of the~~ ~~Celebrity Reflection~~ unsecured amortizing term loan balance of approximately $518.1 million from LIBOR plus 0.40% to a fixed rate (including applicable margin) of 2.85% through the term of the loan. Additionally, at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we maintained interest rate swap agreements on our ~~Quantum of the Seas~~ ~~term loan. Our interest rate swap agreements effectively converted the interest rate on a portion of the~~ ~~Quantum of the Seas~~ unsecured amortizing term loan balance of approximately $704.4 million from LIBOR plus 1.30% to a fixed rate of 3.74% (inclusive of margin) through the term of the loan. Furthermore, at September 30, 2015, we maintained interest rate swap agreements on our ~~Anthem of the Seas~~ ~~term loan. Our interest rate swap agreements effectively converted the interest rate on a portion of the~~ ~~Anthem of the Seas~~ unsecured amortizing term loan balance of approximately $725.0 million from LIBOR plus 1.30% to a fixed rate of 3.86% (inclusive of margin) through the term of the loan. These interest rate swap agreements are accounted for as cash flow hedges.

The notional amount of interest rate swap agreements related to outstanding debt and on our current unfunded financing arrangements as of September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and December 31, ~~2014~~2015 was ~~$4.4~~$4.2 billion and ~~$2.9~~$4.3 billion, respectively.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

Derivative Instruments

Our primary exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk relates to our ship construction contracts denominated in Euros, our foreign currency denominated debt and our international business operations. We enter into foreign currency forward contracts, collar options and cross currency swap agreements to manage portions of the exposure to movements in foreign currency exchange rates. As of September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, the aggregate cost of our ships on firm order, not including ~~the "Project Edge" ships and~~ the TUI Cruises' ships on order and those subject to conditions to effectiveness, was approximately ~~$5.0~~$5.3 billion, of which we had deposited ~~$449.8~~$282.0 million as of such date. ~~Approximately 43.7%~~At September 30, 2016 and ~~28.8%~~December 31, 2015, approximately 56.1% and 58.2%, respectively, of the aggregate cost of the ships under construction was exposed to fluctuations in the Euro exchange ~~rate at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.~~rate. The majority of our foreign currency forward contracts, collar options and cross currency swap agreements are accounted for as cash flow, fair value or net investment hedges depending on the designation of the related hedge.

On a regular basis, we enter into foreign currency forward contracts and, from time to time, we utilize cross-currency swap agreements to minimize the volatility resulting from the remeasurement of net monetary assets and liabilities denominated in a currency other than our functional currency or the functional currencies of our foreign subsidiaries. During the third quarter of ~~2015,~~2016, we maintained an average of approximately ~~$517.2~~$801.9 million of these foreign currency forward contracts. These instruments are not designated as hedging instruments. Changes in the fair value of the foreign currency forward contracts resulted in a loss, of approximately ~~$32.7~~$2.5 million and ~~$35.1~~$32.7 million ~~respectively,~~ during the quarters ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and September 30, ~~2014,~~2015, respectively, and approximately ~~$49.6~~$11.8 million and ~~$24.2~~$49.6 million, during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and September 30, ~~2014,~~2015, respectively, that were recognized in earnings within Other incomein our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).

~~We consider our investments in our foreign operations to be denominated in relatively stable currencies and~~

Table of a long-term nature. As of September 30, 2015, we maintained foreign currency forward contracts of €415.6 million, or approximately $464.0 million based on the exchange rate at September 30, 2015, and designated them as hedges of a portion of our net investments in Pullmantur and TUI Cruises. These forward currency contracts mature in April 2016.Contents

The notional amount of outstanding foreign exchange contracts including our forward contracts ~~and collar options~~ as of September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and December 31, ~~2014~~2015 was ~~$2.5~~$1.4 billion and ~~$3.0~~$2.4 billion, respectively.

~~Table of Contents~~

Non-Derivative Instruments

We also address the exposure of our investments in foreign operations by denominating a portion of our debt in our subsidiaries’ and investments’ functional currencies and designating it as a hedge of these subsidiaries and investments. We had designated debt as a hedge of our net investments in ~~Pullmantur and~~ TUI Cruises of approximately ~~€185.9 million and €139.4~~€290.0 million, or approximately ~~$207.6 million and $168.7~~$325.8 million, as of September 30, ~~2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.~~2016.

Fuel Price Risk

Our exposure to market risk for changes in fuel prices relates primarily to the consumption of fuel on our ships. We use fuel swap agreements to mitigate the financial impact of fluctuations in fuel prices.

Our fuel swap agreements are accounted for as cash flow hedges. At September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, we have hedged the variability in future cash flows for certain forecasted fuel transactions occurring through ~~2019.~~2020. As of September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and December 31, ~~2014,~~2015, we had the following outstanding fuel swap agreements:



	Fuel Swap Agreements
	As of September 30, 2016	As of December 31, 2015
	(metric tons)
2016	231,000	930,000
2017	799,000	854,000
2018	616,000	583,000
2019	521,000	231,000
2020	307,000	—

Fuel Swap Agreements
As of September 30, 2015 As of December 31, 2014
(metric tons)
2015 197,000
806,000
2016 930,000
802,000
2017 854,000
525,000
2018 583,000
226,000
2019 153,000
—


	Fuel Swap Agreements				Fuel Swap Agreements
	As of September 30, 2015		As of December 31, 2014		As of September 30, 2016		As of December 31, 2015
	(% hedged)				(% hedged)
Projected fuel purchases:
2015	57	%	58	%
2016	65	%	55	%	68	%	65	%
2017	59	%	35	%	60	%	59	%
2018	40	%	15	%	45	%	40	%
2019	10	%	—		36	%	15	%
2020					20	%	—

At September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and December 31, ~~2014, $252.0~~2015, $196.2 million and ~~$223.1~~$321.0 million, respectively, of estimated unrealized net loss associated with our cash flow hedges pertaining to fuel swap agreements were expected to be reclassified to earnings from Accumulated other comprehensive loss within the next twelve months. Reclassification is expected to occur as the result of fuel consumption associated with our hedged forecasted fuel purchases.

Table of Contents

The fair value and line item caption of derivative instruments recorded within our consolidated balance sheets were as follows:


	Fair Value of Derivative Instruments																		Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
	Asset Derivatives									Liability Derivatives									Asset Derivatives									Liability Derivatives
	Balance Sheet Location		As of September 30, 2015				As of December 31, 2014			Balance Sheet Location		As of September 30, 2015				As of December 31, 2014			Balance Sheet Location		As of September 30, 2016				As of December 31, 2015			Balance Sheet Location		As of September 30, 2016				As of December 31, 2015
		Fair Value				Fair Value					Fair Value				Fair Value					Fair Value				Fair Value					Fair Value				Fair Value
(In thousands)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815-20⁽¹⁾
Interest rate swaps		Other assets		$	1,691			$	—		Other long-term liabilities		$	93,807			$	65,768		Other assets		$	15,371			$	—		Other long-term liabilities		$	139,322			$	67,371
Foreign currency forward contracts	Derivative financial instruments		107,668				—			Derivative financial instruments		292,372				17,619			Derivative financial instruments		—				93,996			Derivative financial instruments		136				320,873
Foreign currency forward contracts	Other assets		—				63,981			Other long-term liabilities		—				164,627			Other assets		6,926				—			Other long-term liabilities		7,392				—
Foreign currency collar options	Derivative financial instruments		—				—			Derivative financial instruments		—				21,855
Fuel swaps	Derivative financial instruments		—				—			Derivative financial instruments		239,715				227,512			Derivative financial instruments		—				—			Derivative financial instruments		183,470				307,475
Fuel swaps	Other assets		—				—			Other long-term liabilities		277,158				270,254			Other assets		13,038				—			Other long-term liabilities		149,110				325,055
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments under 815-20			109,359				63,981					903,052				767,635					35,335				93,996					479,430				1,020,774
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815-20
Foreign currency forward contracts																			Derivative financial instruments		$	—			$	32,339		Derivative financial instruments		$	—			$	—
Fuel swaps	Derivative financial instruments		3,079				—			Derivative financial instruments		17,437				—			Derivative financial instruments		928				8,239			Derivative financial instruments		18,271				23,518
Fuel swaps	Other Assets		841				—			Other long-term liabilities		4,713				—			Other Assets		434				—			Other long-term liabilities		9,501				—
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under 815-20			3,920				—					22,150				—					1,362				40,578					27,772				23,518
Total derivatives			$	113,279			$	63,981				$	925,202			$	767,635				$	36,697			$	134,574				$	507,202			$	1,044,292

(1) Accounting Standard Codification 815-20 “Derivatives and Hedging.”

The carrying value and line item caption of non-derivative instruments designated as hedging instruments recorded within our consolidated

balance sheets were as follows:


		Carrying Value					Carrying Value
Non-derivative instrument designated as hedging instrument under ASC 815-20	Balance Sheet Location	As of September 30, 2015		As of December 31, 2014		Balance Sheet Location	As of September 30, 2016		As of December 31, 2015
(In thousands)
Foreign currency debt	Long-term debt	$	207,585	$	168,718	Current portion of long-term debt	$	65,595	$	—
Foreign currency debt						Long-term debt	260,191		—
		$	207,585	$	168,718		$	325,786	$	—

Table of Contents

The effect of derivative instruments qualifying and designated as hedging instruments and the related hedged items in fair value hedges on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) was as follows:


Derivatives and Related Hedged Items under ASC 815-20 Fair Value Hedging Relationships	Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative and Hedged Item	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative									Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Hedged Item											Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative and Hedged Item	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative									Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Hedged Item
		Quarter Ended September 30, 2015		Quarter Ended September 30, 2014			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014		Quarter Ended September 30, 2015			Quarter Ended September 30, 2014		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014				Quarter Ended September 30, 2016			Quarter Ended September 30, 2015		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015		Quarter Ended September 30, 2016		Quarter Ended September 30, 2015			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
(In thousands)
Interest rate swaps	Interest expense, net of interest capitalized	$	2,793	$	3,063		$	8,640	$	9,199	$	3,968		$	3,968	$	11,775		$	13,435		Interest expense, net of interest capitalized	$	1,737		$	2,793	$	6,075	$	8,640	$	—	$	3,968		$	7,203		$	11,775
Interest rate swaps	Other income	22,341		(3,010		)	21,780		24,431		(20,252		)	3,934		(18,245		)	(19,122		)	Other income	(7,662		)	22,341		28,592		21,780		7,423		(20,252		)	(24,878		)	(18,245		)
		$	25,134	$	53		$	30,420	$	33,630	$	(16,284	)	$	7,902	$	(6,470	)	$	(5,687	)		$	(5,925	)	$	25,134	$	34,667	$	30,420	$	7,423	$	(16,284	)	$	(17,675	)	$	(6,470	)

The effect of derivative instruments qualifying and designated as cash flow hedging instruments on the consolidated financial statements was as follows:


Derivatives under ASC 815-20 Cash Flow Hedging Relationships	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) on Derivative (Effective Portion)												Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss into Income (Effective Portion)		Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) into Income (Effective Portion)															Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) on Derivative (Effective Portion)													Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss into Income (Effective Portion)	Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) into Income (Effective Portion)
	Quarter Ended September 30, 2015			Quarter Ended September 30, 2014			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014				Quarter Ended September 30, 2015				Quarter Ended September 30, 2014				Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015				Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014			Quarter Ended September 30, 2016			Quarter Ended September 30, 2015			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015				Quarter Ended September 30, 2016			Quarter Ended September 30, 2015			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
(In thousands)
Cross currency swaps	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		Interest expense, net of interest capitalized		$	—			$	��			$	—			$	(261	)
Interest rate swaps	(68,956		)	1,331			(75,104		)	(71,621		)	Interest expense, net of interest capitalized		(10,276		)		(3,106		)		(27,024		)		(9,312		)	$	6,598		$	(68,956	)	$	(126,505	)	$	(75,104	)		Interest expense, net of interest capitalized	$	(11,953	)	$	(10,276	)	$	(32,019	)	$	(27,024	)
Foreign currency forward contracts	(619		)	(163,387		)	(131,211		)	(172,629		)	Depreciation and amortization expenses		(752		)		(450		)		(2,153		)		(1,348		)	11,405			(619		)	22,715			(131,211		)		Depreciation and amortization expenses	(2,710		)	(752		)	(5,408		)	(2,153		)
Foreign currency forward contracts	—			—			—			—			Other income		(239		)		(238		)		(715		)		(4,052		)	—			—			—			—				Other income	(3,465		)	(239		)	(10,206		)	(715		)
Foreign currency forward contracts	—			—			—			—			Interest expense, net of interest capitalized		—				—				—				(57		)	—			—			—			—				Other operating	—			—			(207		)	—
Foreign currency collar options	34			(21,904		)	(64,559		)	(30,638		)	Depreciation and amortization expenses		(568		)		—				(1,003		)		—			—			34			—			(64,559		)		Depreciation and amortization expenses	(601		)	(568		)	(1,806		)	(1,003		)
Fuel swaps	(230,761		)	(71,456		)	(213,072		)	(64,527		)	Fuel		(65,975		)		(1,996		)		(172,083		)		(1,206		)	—			—			—			—				Other income	2,760			—			9,356			—
Fuel swaps																														(3,090		)	(230,761		)	94,640			(213,072		)		Fuel	(64,654		)	(65,975		)	(223,484		)	(172,083		)
	$	(300,302	)	$	(255,416	)	$	(483,946	)	$	(339,415	)			$	(77,810	)		$	(5,790	)		$	(202,978	)		$	(16,236	)	$	14,913		$	(300,302	)	$	(9,150	)	$	(483,946	)			$	(80,623	)	$	(77,810	)	$	(263,774	)	$	(202,978	)

Table of Contents


Derivatives under ASC 815- 20 Cash Flow Hedging Relationships	Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)
		Quarter Ended September 30, 2015			Quarter Ended September 30, 2014			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
Derivatives under ASC 815-20 Cash Flow Hedging Relationships														Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)
															Quarter Ended September 30, 2016			Quarter Ended September 30, 2015			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
(In thousands)
Interest rate swaps	Other income	(617		)	17			(395		)	(78		)	Other income	90			(617		)	(1,152		)	(395		)
Foreign currency forward contracts	Other income	—			15			—			(12		)	Other income	—			—			(57		)	—
Fuel swaps	Other income	(2,353		)	(8,069		)	(2,771		)	(7,607		)	Other income	(8		)	(2,353		)	(3,949		)	(2,771		)
		$	(2,970	)	$	(8,037	)	$	(3,166	)	$	(7,697	)		$	82		$	(2,970	)	$	(5,158	)	$	(3,166	)

The effect of non-derivative instruments qualifying and designated as net investment hedging instruments on the consolidated financial statements was as follows:


	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Effective Portion)									Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Effective Portion)
Non-derivative instruments under ASC 815-20 Net Investment Hedging Relationships	Quarter Ended September 30, 2015			Quarter Ended September 30, 2014		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014		Quarter Ended September 30, 2016			Quarter Ended September 30, 2015			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
(In thousands)
Foreign Currency Debt	$	(436	)	$	13,408	$	8,955	$	18,038	$	(3,382	)	$	(436	)	$	1,313	$	8,955
	$	(436	)	$	13,408	$	8,955	$	18,038	$	(3,382	)	$	(436	)	$	1,313	$	8,955

There was no amount recognized in income (ineffective portion and amount excluded from effectiveness testing) for the quarters and nine ~~month periods~~months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and September 30, ~~2014,~~2015, respectively.

The effect of derivatives not designated as hedging instruments on the consolidated financial statements was as follows:


		Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives													Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments under ASC 815-20	Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives	Quarter Ended September 30, 2015			Quarter Ended September 30, 2014			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014			Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives	Quarter Ended September 30, 2016			Quarter Ended September 30, 2015			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
(In thousands)
Foreign currency forward contracts	Other income	$	(32,705	)	$	(35,175	)	$	(49,607	)	$	(24,405	)	Other income	$	(2,464	)	$	(32,705	)	$	(11,712	)	$	(49,607	)
Fuel swaps	Other income	(76		)	(220		)	(191		)	(1,157		)	Other income	(1,172		)	(76		)	(1,224		)	(191		)
		$	(32,781	)	$	(35,395	)	$	(49,798	)	$	(25,562	)		$	(3,636	)	$	(32,781	)	$	(12,936	)	$	(49,798	)

Credit Related Contingent Features

Our current interest rate derivative instruments may require us to post collateral if our Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s credit ratings remain below specified levels. Specifically, if on the fifth anniversary of ~~entering into~~executing a derivative ~~transaction~~instrument, or on any succeeding fifth-year anniversary, our credit ratings for our senior unsecured debt were to be rated below BBB- by Standard & Poor’s and Baa3 by Moody’s, then ~~each~~the counterparty ~~to such derivative transaction with whom we are in a net liability position that exceeds the applicable minimum call amount~~ may periodically demand that we post collateral in an amount equal to the difference between (i) the net ~~liability position.~~ market value of all derivative transactions with such counterparty that have reached their fifth year anniversary, to the extent negative, and (ii) the applicable minimum call amount.

The amount of collateral required to be posted following such event will change ~~each time~~as, and to the extent, our net liability position increases or decreases by more than the applicable minimum call amount. If our credit rating for our senior unsecured debt is subsequently equal to or above BBB- by Standard & Poor’s or Baa3 by Moody’s, then any collateral posted at such time will be released to us and we will no longer be required to post collateral unless we meet the collateral trigger requirement at the next fifth-year anniversary. Currently, our senior unsecured debt credit rating is BB+ with a stable outlook by Standard & Poor’s and Ba1 with a ~~stable~~positive outlook by Moody’s. We currently have seven interest rate derivative hedges that have a term of at least five years. ~~The aggregate fair values of all derivative instruments with such credit-related contingent features in net liability positions as~~As of September 30, ~~2015~~2016, none of these instruments had reached their fifth anniversary and, ~~December 31, 2014~~accordingly, we were ~~$93.8 million and $65.8 million, respectively, which do~~ not ~~include~~required to post any collateral as of such date.

During the ~~impact~~next twelve months, four of ~~any such derivatives in net asset positions. The earliest that any of the seven~~our interest rate derivative hedges will reach their fifth anniversary, iswith the first such anniversary to occur on November 2016. ~~Therefore,~~If each of these four interest rate hedges had already reached its fifth anniversary as of September 30, 2016, our maximum collateral exposure would have been $96.8 million. Similarly, our maximum collateral exposure as of December 31, 2015, would have been $14.6

Table of Contents

million if all hedges scheduled to reach their fifth anniversary date within one year had instead reached their fifth anniversary as of December 31, 2015.

Note 11. Restructuring Charges

Pullmantur Right-sizing Strategy

Pullmantur's strategy over the last several years had focused both on its core cruise market in Spain and on expansion throughout Latin America, especially Brazil. However, due to significant and increased challenges facing Pullmantur's Latin American operations, in 2015, we decided to significantly change our strategy from growing the brand through vessel transfers to a right-sizing strategy. This right-sizing strategy included reducing our exposure to Latin America, refocusing on the brand’s core market of Spain and, consequently, reducing the size of Pullmantur’s fleet.

The right-sizing strategy activities included the closing of Pullmantur's regional head office in Brazil, the redeployment of Pullmantur’s Empress to the Royal Caribbean International brand and personnel reorganization in Pullmantur's headquarters and CDF's office in France. The closure of the Brazil office and the personnel reorganization resulted in the recognition of a liability for one-time termination benefits during the nine months ended September 30, 2016. We also incurred contract termination costs related to the closure of the Brazil office.

As a result of these actions, we incurred restructuring exit costs of $0.3 million and $2.5 million for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, which are reported within Restructuring charges in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).

The following table summarizes our restructuring exit costs related to the above strategy (in thousands):



	Beginning Balance January 1, 2016		Accruals		Payments		Ending Balance September 30, 2016		Cumulative Charges Incurred
Termination benefits	$	—	$	2,416	$	2,416	$	—	$	2,416
Contract termination costs		—		68		68		—		68
Total	$	—	$	2,484	$	2,484	$	—	$	2,484

In connection with this strategy, we incurred approximately $3.6 million of other costs during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, that primarily consisted of costs associated with the redeployment of Pullmantur's Empress to the Royal Caribbean International brand that were ~~not required to post collateral for any~~reported within Cruise operating expenses,Depreciation and amortization expenses and Marketing, selling and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).

In July 2016, we sold 51% of our ~~derivative transactions.~~interest in RCHE, the parent company of the Pullmantur and CDF brands. In connection with the sale, we incurred approximately $3.3 million of other costs during the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2016 that were reported within Cruise operating expenses and Marketing, selling and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). Refer to Note 1. General for further information regarding this sale transaction.

Other Restructuring Initiatives

During the second and third quarters of 2016, we moved forward with certain other initiatives, including the closing of an international office in Brazil related to the Royal Caribbean International brand and personnel reorganization in our corporate offices. These initiatives resulted in restructuring costs of $1.5 million and $4.1 million for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively. The restructuring costs are mainly due to the recognition of a liability for one-time termination benefits. Through the remainder of 2016, we may incur additional immaterial costs as it relates to the restructuring at our corporate and international offices.

21Table of Contents

The following table summarizes our restructuring exit costs related to the above initiatives (in thousands):



	Beginning Balance January 1, 2016		Accruals		Payments		Ending Balance September 30, 2016		Cumulative Charges Incurred
Termination benefits	$	—	$	4,128	$	1,584	$	2,544	$	4,128
Contract termination costs		—		15		15		—		15
Total	$	—	$	4,143	$	1,599	$	2,544	$	4,143

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Cautionary Note Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

The discussion under this caption "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and elsewhere in this document includes "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical fact, including statements regarding guidance (including our expectations for the fourth quarter and full year of ~~2015~~2016 and our earnings and yield estimates for ~~2015~~2016 set forth under the heading "Outlook" ~~below, expectations regarding the timing and results of our Double-Double Program and our plans with respect to share repurchases)~~below), business and industry prospects or future results of operations or financial position, made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are forward-looking. Words such as "anticipate," "believe," "could," "estimate," "expect," "goal," "intend," "may," "plan," "project," "seek," "should," ~~"will"~~"will," "driving" and similar expressions are intended to further identify any of these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements reflect management's current expectations but they are based on judgments and are inherently uncertain. Furthermore, they are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from the future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied in those forward-looking statements. Examples of these risks, uncertainties and other factors include, but are not limited to, those discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015 and, in particular, the risks discussed under the caption "Risk Factors" in Part I, Item 1A of that report.

All forward-looking statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q speak only as of the date of this document. Given these risks and uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Overview

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations has been organized to present the following:

a review of our financial presentation, including discussion of certain operational and financial metrics we utilize to assist us in managing our business;

a discussion of our results of operations for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 compared to the same periods in ~~2014;~~2015;

a discussion of our business outlook, including our expectations for selected financial items for the fourth quarter and full year of ~~2015;~~2016; and

a discussion of our liquidity and capital resources, including our future capital and contractual commitments and potential funding sources.

Critical Accounting Policies

~~Valuation of Goodwill, Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets and Long-Lived Assets~~

~~Table of Contents~~

reducing our exposure to Latin America, refocusing on the brand’s core market of Spain and, consequently, reducing the size of Pullmantur’s fleet. This strategic change includes a decision to redeploy Pullmantur’s ~~Empress~~ ~~to the Royal Caribbean International brand as well as a decision to cancel the intended transfer of the~~ ~~Majesty of the Seas~~ to Pullmantur. As we previously disclosed, the planned growth of the Pullmantur fleet through the transfer of vessels into the brand has been the most significant assumption within Pullmantur's projected cash flows supporting the recoverability of the Pullmantur reporting unit’s goodwill and trademarks and trade names. Our decision to reduce the size of Pullmantur’s fleet significantly decreases the cash flow projections which have been the basis of our impairment analysis.

The combined impairment charge of $411.3 million related to Pullmantur’s goodwill, trademarks and trade names, vessels and aircraft was recognized in earnings during the quarter ended September 30, 2015 and is reported within ~~Impairment of Pullmantur related assets~~ ~~within our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). For further information on the fair value measurements used to estimate the fair value of these assets, refer to Note 10.~~ ~~Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures~~.

For a discussion of our critical accounting policies, refer to Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations within our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2014.~~2015.

Seasonality

Our revenues are seasonal based on demand for cruises. Demand is strongest for cruises during the Northern Hemisphere’s summer months and holidays. In order to mitigate the impact of the winter weather in the Northern Hemisphere and to capitalize on the summer season in the Southern Hemisphere, our brands have focused on deployment to ~~Australia, Latin America~~the Caribbean, Asia and ~~Asia~~Australia during that period.

Financial Presentation

Description of Certain Line Items

Revenues

Our revenues are comprised of the following:

Table of Contents

Passenger ticket revenues, which consist of revenue recognized from the sale of passenger tickets and the sale of air transportation to and from our ships; and

~~Table of Contents~~

Onboard and other revenues, which consist primarily of revenues from the sale of goods and/or services onboard our ships not included in passenger ticket prices, cancellation fees, sales of vacation protection insurance and pre- and post-cruise tours. ~~Additionally, revenue related to Pullmantur’s travel agency network, land-based tours and air charter business to third parties are included in~~ ~~Onboard and other revenues~~ ~~through March 31, 2014, the date of the sale of Pullmantur's non-core businesses.~~ Onboard and other revenues also includes revenues we receive from independent third party concessionaires that pay us a percentage of their revenues in exchange for the right to provide selected goods and/or services onboard our ships as well as revenues received for our bareboat charter, procurement and management related services we perform on behalf of our unconsolidated affiliates.

Cruise Operating Expenses

Our cruise operating expenses are comprised of the following:

Commissions, transportation and other expenses, which consist of those costs directly associated with passenger ticket revenues, including travel agent commissions, air and other transportation expenses, port costs that vary with passenger head counts and related credit card fees;

Onboard and other expenses, which consist of the direct costs associated with onboard and other revenues, including the costs of products sold onboard our ships, vacation protection insurance premiums, costs associated with pre- and post-cruise tours and related credit card fees as well as the minimal costs associated with concession revenues, as the costs are mostly incurred by third-party concessionaires and costs incurred for the procurement and management related services we perform on behalf of our unconsolidated affiliates;

Payroll and related expenses, which consist of costs for shipboard personnel (costs associated with our shoreside personnel are included in Marketing, selling and administrative expenses);

•

Food expenses, which include food costs for both guests and crew;

Fuel expenses, which include fuel and related delivery, storage and ~~storage~~emission consumable costs ~~including~~and the financial impact of fuel swap agreements; and

Other operating expenses, which consist primarily of operating costs such as repairs and maintenance, port costs that do not vary with passenger head counts, vessel related insurance, entertainment and ~~entertainment. Additionally, costs associated with Pullmantur’s travel agency network, land-based tours~~gains and ~~air charter business~~/or losses related to ~~third parties are included in Other operating~~ ~~expenses through March 31, 2014, the date of~~ the sale of ~~Pullmantur's non-core businesses.~~our ships, if any.

We do not allocate payroll and related expenses, food expenses, fuel expenses or other operating expenses to the expense categories attributable to passenger ticket revenues or onboard and other revenues since they are incurred to provide the total cruise vacation experience.

Selected Operational and Financial Metrics

We utilize a variety of operational and financial metrics which are defined below to evaluate our performance and financial condition. As discussed in more detail herein, certain of these metrics are non-GAAP financial measures, which we believe provide useful information to investors as a supplement to our consolidated financial statements, which are prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP. The presentation of non-GAAP financial information is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for, or superior to, the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP.

Adjusted Earnings per Share represents Adjusted Net Income divided by weighted average shares outstanding or by diluted weighted average shares outstanding, as applicable. We believe that this non-GAAP measure is meaningful when assessing our performance on a comparative basis.

Adjusted Net Income represents net income excluding certain items that we believe adjusting for is meaningful when assessing our performance on a comparative basis. For the periods presented, these items included the impairment of the Pullmantur related assets, net loss related to the elimination of the Pullmantur reporting lag, the net gain related to the sale of the Pullmantur and CDF brands and related costs, restructuring charges and other initiative costs related to our ~~profitability initiatives, the estimated impact of the divested~~ Pullmantur ~~non-core businesses for periods prior to the sales transaction, the loss recognized on the sale of~~ ~~Celebrity Century~~right-sizing strategy and the impact of the change in our voyage proration. The estimated impact of the divested Pullmantur non-core businesses was arrived at by adjusting the net income (loss) of these businesses for the ownership percentage we retained, as well as for intercompany transactions that are no longer eliminated in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) subsequent to the sales transaction.other restructuring initiatives.

Table of Contents

Available Passenger Cruise Days (“APCD”) is our measurement of capacity and represents double occupancy per cabin multiplied by the number of cruise days for the period. We use this measure to perform capacity and rate analysis to identify our main non-capacity drivers that cause our cruise revenue and expenses to vary.

Gross Cruise Costs represent the sum of total cruise operating expenses plus marketing, selling and administrative expenses.

Gross Yields represent total revenues per APCD.

Net Cruise Costs and Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel represent Gross Cruise Costs excluding commissions, transportation and other expenses and onboard and other expenses and, in the case of Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel, fuel expenses (each of which is described above under the Description of Certain Line Items heading). In measuring our ability to control costs in a manner that positively impacts net income, we believe changes in Net Cruise Costs and Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel to be the most relevant indicators of our performance. A reconciliation of historical Gross Cruise Costs to Net Cruise Costs and Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel is provided below under Results of Operations. We have not provided a quantitative reconciliation of projected Gross Cruise Costs to projected Net Cruise Costs and projected Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel due to the significant uncertainty in projecting the costs deducted to arrive at these measures. Accordingly, we do not believe that reconciling information for such projected figures would be meaningful. ~~For~~Net Cruise Costs excludes the ~~periods prior~~net gain related to the sale of the Pullmantur ~~non-core businesses, Net Cruise Costs excludes the estimated impact of these divested businesses. Net Cruise Costs also excludes~~and CDF brands and related costs and initiative costs ~~reported within~~ ~~Cruise operating expenses~~ related to our Pullmantur right-sizing strategy and ~~Marketing, selling and administrative expenses, as well as the loss recognized on the sale of~~ ~~Celebrity Century~~ ~~included within~~ ~~Other Operating Expenses~~.other restructuring initiatives.

Net Revenues represent total revenues less commissions, transportation and other expenses and onboard and other expenses (each of which is described above under the Description of Certain Line Items heading). ~~For the periods prior to the sale of the Pullmantur non-core businesses, we have presented Net Revenues excluding the estimated impact of these divested businesses.~~

Net Yields represent Net Revenues per APCD. We utilize Net Revenues and Net Yields to manage our business on a day-to-day basis as we believe that it is the most relevant measure of our pricing performance because it reflects the cruise revenues earned by us net of our most significant variable costs, which are commissions, transportation and other expenses and onboard and other expenses. A reconciliation of historical Gross Yields to Net Yields is provided below under Results of Operations. We have not provided a quantitative reconciliation of projected Gross Yields to projected Net Yields due to the significant uncertainty in projecting the costs deducted to arrive at this measure. Accordingly, we do not believe that reconciling information for such projected figures would be meaningful. ~~For the periods prior~~Net Yields excludes initiative costs related to the sale of the Pullmantur ~~non-core businesses, Net Yields excludes the estimated impact of these divested businesses.~~and CDF brands.

Occupancy, in accordance with cruise vacation industry practice, is calculated by dividing Passenger Cruise Days by APCD. A percentage in excess of 100% indicates that three or more passengers occupied some cabins.

Passenger Cruise Days represent the number of passengers carried for the period multiplied by the number of days of their respective cruises.

We believe Net Yields, Net Cruise Costs and Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel are our most relevant non-GAAP financial measures. However, a significant portion of our revenue and expenses are denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar. Because our reporting currency is the United States dollar, the value of these revenues and expenses can be affected by changes in currency exchange rates. Although such changes in local currency prices is just one of many elements impacting our revenues and expenses, it can be an important element. For this reason, we also monitor Net Yields, Net Cruise Costs and Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel as if the current periods’ currency exchange rates had remained constant with the comparable prior periods’ rates, or on a “Constant Currency” basis.

It should be emphasized that Constant Currency is primarily used for comparing short-term changes and/or projections. Changes in guest sourcing and shifting the amount of purchases between currencies can change the impact of the purely currency-based fluctuations.

The use of certain significant non-GAAP measures, such as Net Yields, Net Cruise Costs and Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel, allows us to perform capacity and rate analysis to separate the impact of known capacity changes from other less predictable changes which affect our business. We believe these non-GAAP measures provide expanded insight to measure revenue and cost performance in addition to the standard United States GAAP based financial measures. There are no specific rules or regulations for determining non-GAAP and Constant Currency measures, and as such, there exists the possibility that they may not be comparable to other companies within the industry.

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Summary

Our net income and Adjusted Net Income for the third quarter of ~~2015~~2016 was $693.3 million and $690.9 million, or $3.21 and $3.20 per share on a diluted basis, respectively, as compared to net income and Adjusted Net Income of $228.8 million and $628.1 million, or $1.03 and $2.84 per share on a diluted basis, ~~as compared to net income and Adjusted Net Income of $490.2 million and $492.9 million, or $2.19 and $2.20 per share on a diluted basis,~~ respectively, for the third quarter of ~~2014.~~2015.

Our net income and Adjusted Net Income for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 was $1.0 billion and $1.1 billion, or $4.72 and $4.85 per share on a diluted basis, respectively, as compared to net income and Adjusted Net Income of $459.0 million and $858.3 million, or $2.08 and $3.88 per share on a diluted basis, ~~as compared to net income and Adjusted Net Income of $654.4 million and $685.7 million, or $2.93 and $3.07 per share on a diluted basis,~~ respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2014.~~2015.

Significant items for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 include:

In September 2015, we recognized an impairment charge of $399.3 million, net of a $12.0 million deferred tax benefit, to write down Pullmantur's goodwill to its implied fair value and to write down trademarks and trade names and certain long-lived assets to their fair value. Refer to Note 3. ~~Impairment of Pullmantur Related Assets~~ ~~for further discussion.~~

The effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to our passenger ticket and onboard and other revenue transactions and cruise operating expenses denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar, resulted in a decrease to total revenues of ~~$126.5~~$58.8 million and ~~$302.7~~$154.3 million for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, respectively, as compared to the same ~~period~~periods in ~~2014~~2015, and a decrease to cruise operating expenses of ~~$50.7~~$10.2 million and ~~$131.5~~$34.2 million for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, respectively, as compared to the same ~~period~~periods in ~~2014;~~

A decrease of $37.2 million and $37.9 million to total revenues and cruises operating expenses, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the same period in 2014 due to Pullmantur's non-core businesses that were sold in 2014;2015;

Total revenues, excluding the unfavorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates, increased $99.5 million and ~~the decrease in revenues from the sale of Pullmantur’s non-core businesses discussed above, increased 10.9% and 7.7%~~$344.0 million for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, ~~2015, respectively,~~2016 as compared to the same periods in ~~2014.~~2015. The ~~increase was~~increases were primarily due to ~~a 6.7% and 5.2% increase~~increases in capacity, ~~for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, net of the unfavorable impact of the change in our voyage proration;~~which are further discussed below.

Total Cruise operating expenses, excluding the favorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates, decreased $36.7 million and ~~the decrease in cruise operating expenses from the sale of Pullmantur's non-core businesses discussed above, remained consistent~~increased $0.4 million for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, respectively, as compared to the ~~corresponding~~same periods in ~~2014.~~2015. The decrease during the quarter was primarily due to a decrease in fuel expense and the increase during the nine months was primarily due to the increase in capacity, which are further discussed below.

~~As of September 30, 2014,~~

Effective January 1, 2016, we changed our voyage recognition methodology and recognize passenger ticket revenues, revenues from onboard and other goods and services and all associated cruise operating costs for all of our uncompleted voyages on a pro-rata basis. The effecteliminated RCHE's, the parent company of the Pullmantur and CDF brands, two-month reporting lag to be consistent with the fiscal calendar of the Company. As a result of this change, ~~is a decrease to net~~the results of RCHE for November and December 2015 are included in our statement of comprehensive income ~~of $31.7 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 and a decrease to net income of $53.2 million~~(loss) for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016. The effect of this change was a decrease to net income of $21.7 million and this amount is reported within Other income in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. Refer to Note 1. Financial Statements to our consolidated financial statements for further information on the elimination of the Pullmantur reporting lag.

In July 2016, we sold 51% of our interest in RCHE. We retained a 49% interest in these businesses as ~~compared~~well as full ownership of the vessels and aircraft. As a result of the sale of a majority interest in these businesses, we recognized an immaterial gain and no longer consolidate these businesses in our consolidated financial statements effective August 2016. Refer to ~~the same periods in 2014.~~Note 1. General to our consolidated financial statements for further information.

Other Items

In ~~March 2015, we announced the pending sale of~~ ~~Splendour of the Seas~~ ~~to TUI Cruises GmbH, our 50%-owned joint venture. The sale for €188 million is scheduled to be completed in~~ April 2016, in order to retain the future revenues to be generated for sailings through that date. After the sale, TUI Cruises will lease the ship to Thomson Cruises, which will operate the ship. The purchase price will be financed by us under a secured credit agreement to be repaid over 10 years. The resulting term loan will be 50% guaranteed by TUI AG, our joint venture partner, and will be secured by a first mortgage on the ship. Interest will accrue at the rate of 6.25% per annum. We executed certain forward contracts to lock in the sales price of the ship at approximately $213 million. We expect to recognize a gain on the sale, which we do not expect will have a material effect to our consolidated financial statements.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~In April 2015,~~ we took delivery of ~~Anthem~~Ovation of the Seas. To finance the purchase, we borrowed ~~$742.1~~$841.8 million under a previously committed 12-year unsecured term loan, which is 95% guaranteed by Hermes. Refer to Note 6. Long-Term Debt to our consolidated financial statements for further information.

In May ~~2015, TUI Cruises, our 50% joint venture,~~2016, we took delivery of ~~Mein Schiff 4~~.

In June 2015, we entered into an agreement with Meyer Werft to build the fourth Quantum-class ship for Royal Caribbean International. We have also received a commitment for the unsecured financing of up to 80%Harmony of the ~~ship’s contract price. Hermes has agreed to guarantee to~~Seas. To finance the ~~lenders payment of 95%~~purchase, we borrowed €700.7 million, or $787.2 million based on the exchange rate at September 30, 2016, and $226.1 million under previously committed unsecured term loans. Both of the ~~financing. Refer to Note 7.~~ ~~Commitments and Contingencies~~ ~~for further information.~~

~~In June 2015, TUI Cruises placed orders with Meyer Turku to build two new ships. The ships will each have a capacity of approximately 2,850 berths and~~facilities are ~~expected to enter service each of 2018 and 2019. Refer to Note 5.~~ ~~Other Assets~~ ~~for further information.~~

In June 2015, we amended and restated our $1.1 billion unsecured revolving credit facility due July 2016. The amendment reduced the applicable margin and facility fee and extended the termination date to June 2020.100% guaranteed by COFACE. Refer to Note 6. ~~Long-term~~Long-Term Debt to our consolidated financial statements for further information.

In ~~July 2015,~~May 2016, TUI Cruises, our 50% joint venture, took delivery of Mein Schiff 5.

In June 2016, we ~~amended our $380.0 million, €365.0 million, $290.0 million and $65.0 million unsecured term loans due at various dates from 2016~~entered into an agreement to sell a ship to Thomson Cruises. The sale is scheduled to be completed in March 2017 in order to retain the future revenues to be generated for sailings through ~~2019~~that date. We expect to ~~reduce~~recognize a gain on the applicable margins. Additionally, the termination date of the $290 million unsecured term loan was extended from February 2016 to February 2018. We also amended our $1.2 billion unsecured revolving credit facility due August 2018 to reduce pricing in line with the amended pricing of the $1.1 billion unsecured revolving credit facility. Refer to Note 6. ~~Long-term Debt~~sale, which we do not expect will have a material effect to our annual consolidated financial ~~statements for further information.~~statements.

Table of Contents

Operating results for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 compared to the same ~~periods~~period in ~~2014~~2015 are shown in the following table (in thousands, except per share data):



	Quarter Ended September 30,										Nine months ended September 30,
	2016					2015					2016					2015
				% of Total Revenues					% of Total Revenues					% of Total Revenues					% of Total Revenues
Passenger ticket revenues	$	1,899,956		74.1	%	$	1,873,942		74.3	%	$	4,794,653		72.8	%	$	4,688,189		73.3	%
Onboard and other revenues	663,785			25.9	%	649,158			25.7	%	1,792,145			27.2	%	1,708,832			26.7	%
Total revenues	2,563,741			100.0	%	2,523,100			100.0	%	6,586,798			100.0	%	6,397,021			100.0	%
Cruise operating expenses:
Commissions, transportation and other	400,933			15.6	%	413,156			16.4	%	1,060,391			16.1	%	1,093,409			17.1	%
Onboard and other	159,887			6.2	%	175,214			6.9	%	399,739			6.1	%	438,558			6.9	%
Payroll and related	214,081			8.4	%	217,627			8.6	%	671,955			10.2	%	647,788			10.1	%
Food	125,732			4.9	%	122,124			4.8	%	371,759			5.6	%	361,317			5.6	%
Fuel	178,772			7.0	%	199,848			7.9	%	531,283			8.1	%	607,689			9.5	%
Other operating	260,718			10.2	%	259,057			10.3	%	857,161			13.0	%	777,291			12.2	%
Total cruise operating expenses	1,340,123			52.3	%	1,387,026			55.0	%	3,892,288			59.1	%	3,926,052			61.4	%
Marketing, selling and administrative expenses	257,430			10.0	%	256,060			10.1	%	845,808			12.8	%	817,040			12.8	%
Depreciation and amortization expenses	229,328			8.9	%	210,742			8.4	%	661,712			10.0	%	617,678			9.7	%
Impairment of Pullmantur related assets	—			—	%	411,267			16.3	%	—			—	%	411,267			6.4	%
Restructuring charges	1,897			0.1	%	—			—		6,627			0.1	%	—			—
Operating Income	734,963			28.7	%	258,005			10.2	%	1,180,363			17.9	%	624,984			9.8	%
Other income (expense):
Interest income	6,472			0.3	%	1,735			0.1	%	14,875			0.2	%	8,244			0.1	%
Interest expense, net of interest capitalized	(82,610		)	(3.2	)%	(66,819		)	(2.6	)%	(226,803		)	(3.4	)%	(213,598		)	(3.3	)%
Other income	34,432			1.3	%	35,866			1.4	%	53,867			0.8	%	39,354			0.6	%
	(41,706		)	(1.6	)%	(29,218		)	(1.2	)%	(158,061		)	(2.4	)%	(166,000		)	(2.6	)%
Net Income	$	693,257		27.0	%	$	228,787		9.1	%	$	1,022,302		15.5	%	$	458,984		7.2	%
Diluted Earnings per Share	$	3.21				$	1.03				$	4.72				$	2.08

Table of Contents

Quarter Ended September 30, Nine months ended September 30,
2015 2014 2015 2014
% of Total
Revenues % of Total
Revenues % of Total
Revenues % of Total
Revenues
Passenger ticket revenues $ 1,873,942
74.3 % $ 1,786,746
74.8 % $ 4,688,189
73.3 % $ 4,590,048
73.4 %
Onboard and other revenues 649,158
25.7 % 602,016
25.2 % 1,708,832
26.7 % 1,665,981
26.6 %
Total revenues 2,523,100
100.0 % 2,388,762
100.0 % 6,397,021
100.0 % 6,256,029
100.0 %
Cruise operating expenses:

Commissions, transportation and other 413,156
16.4 % 396,916
16.6 % 1,093,409
17.1 % 1,068,961
17.1 %
Onboard and other 175,214
6.9 % 182,658
7.6 % 438,558
6.9 % 456,296
7.3 %
Payroll and related 217,627
8.6 % 214,260
9.0 % 647,788
10.1 % 634,232
10.1 %
Food 122,124
4.8 % 120,908
5.1 % 361,317
5.6 % 358,172
5.7 %
Fuel 199,848
7.9 % 230,818
9.7 % 607,689
9.5 % 718,081
11.5 %
Other operating 259,057
10.3 % 281,322
11.8 % 777,291
12.2 % 825,794
13.2 %
Total cruise operating expenses 1,387,026
55.0 % 1,426,882
59.7 % 3,926,052
61.4 % 4,061,536
64.9 %
Marketing, selling and administrative expenses 256,060
10.1 % 239,662
10.0 % 817,040
12.8 % 790,957
12.6 %
Depreciation and amortization expenses 210,742
8.4 % 192,448
8.1 % 617,678
9.7 % 579,063
9.3 %
Impairment of Pullmantur related assets 411,267
16.3 % —
— % 411,267
6.4 % —
— %
Restructuring charges —
—
308
— % —
—
1,958
— %
Operating Income 258,005
10.2 % 529,462
22.2 % 624,984
9.8 % 822,515
13.1 %
Other income (expense):

Interest income 1,735
0.1 % 2,117
0.1 % 8,244
0.1 % 8,023
0.1 %
Interest expense, net of interest capitalized (66,819 ) (2.6 )% (60,100 ) (2.5 )% (213,598 ) (3.3 )% (193,931 ) (3.1 )%
Other income 35,866
1.4 % 18,769
0.8 % 39,354
0.6 % 17,771
0.3 %
(29,218 ) (1.2 )% (39,214 ) (1.6 )% (166,000 ) (2.6 )% (168,137 ) (2.7 )%
Net Income $ 228,787
9.1 % $ 490,248
20.5 % $ 458,984
7.2 % $ 654,378
10.5 %
Diluted Earnings per Share $ 1.03

$ 2.19

$ 2.08

$ 2.93

~~Table of Contents~~

Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Earnings per Share were calculated as follows (in thousands, except per share data):


	Quarter Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,					Quarter Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2015		2014			2015		2014			2016			2015		2016			2015
Adjusted Net Income	$	628,070	$	492,853		$	858,267	$	685,681
Net income	228,787		490,248			458,984		654,378
Net Adjustments to Net Income- Increase	$	399,283	$	2,605		$	399,283	$	31,303
Net Income											$	693,257		$	228,787	$	1,022,302		$	458,984
Adjusted Net income											690,911			628,070		1,050,031			858,267
Net Adjustments to Net Income- (Decrease) Increase											$	(2,346	)	$	399,283	$	27,729		$	399,283
Adjustments to Net Income:
Impairment of Pullmantur related assets⁽¹⁾	$	399,283	$	—		$	399,283	$	—		$	—		$	399,283	$	—		$	399,283
Net loss related to the elimination of the Pullmantur reporting lag											—			—		21,656			—
Net gain related to the sale of the Pullmantur and CDF Croisières de France brands											(3,834		)	—		(3,834		)	—
Restructuring charges	—		308			—		1,958			1,897			—		6,627			—
Other initiative costs	—		1,240			—		17,275			(409		)	—		3,280			—
Estimated impact of divested businesses prior to sales transaction	—		—			—		11,013
Loss on sale of ship included within other operating expenses	—		17,401			—		17,401
Impact of voyage proration change	—		(16,344		)	—		(16,344		)
Net Adjustments to Net Income- Increase	$	399,283	$	2,605		$	399,283	$	31,303
Net Adjustments to Net Income- (Decrease) Increase											$	(2,346	)	$	399,283	$	27,729		$	399,283

Basic:
Earnings per Share	$	1.04	$	2.20		$	2.09	$	2.95		$	3.23		$	1.04	$	4.74		$	2.09
Adjusted Earnings per Share	$	2.86	$	2.21		$	3.90	$	3.09		$	3.22		$	2.86	$	4.87		$	3.90

Diluted:
Earnings per Share	$	1.03	$	2.19		$	2.08	$	2.93		$	3.21		$	1.03	$	4.72		$	2.08
Adjusted Earnings per Share	$	2.84	$	2.20		$	3.88	$	3.07		$	3.20		$	2.84	$	4.85		$	3.88

Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding:
Basic	219,963		222,523			219,835		222,007			214,819			219,963		215,663			219,835
Diluted	221,137		223,859			220,979		223,351			215,667			221,137		216,575			220,979

⁽¹⁾ Includes a net income tax benefit of $12.0 million related to the Pullmantur impairment.

Selected statistical information is shown in the following table:


	Quarter Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,				Quarter Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2015		2014		2015		2014		2016		2015		2016⁽¹⁾		2015
Passengers Carried	1,403,650		1,324,993		4,053,451		3,886,823		1,558,224		1,403,650		4,365,144		4,053,451
Passenger Cruise Days	10,176,750		9,603,329		28,856,742		27,489,584		10,727,918		10,176,750		30,367,048		28,856,742
APCD	9,465,368		8,867,375		27,284,750		25,948,292		9,766,482		9,465,368		28,503,681		27,284,750
Occupancy	107.5	%	108.3	%	105.8	%	105.9	%	109.8	%	107.5	%	106.5	%	105.8	%

29⁽¹⁾ Does not include November and December 2015 amounts related to the elimination of the Pullmantur reporting lag.

Table of Contents

Gross Yields and Net Yields were calculated as follows (in thousands, except APCD and Yields):


	Quarter Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Quarter Ended September 30,								Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2015		2015 On a Constant Currency Basis		2014		2015		2015 On a Constant Currency Basis		2014		2016			2016 On a Constant Currency Basis			2015		2016			2016 On a Constant Currency Basis			2015
Passenger ticket revenues	$	1,873,942	$	1,981,570	$	1,786,746	$	4,688,189	$	4,948,954	$	4,590,048	$	1,899,956		$	1,952,378		$	1,873,942	$	4,794,653		$	4,934,937		$	4,688,189
Onboard and other revenues	649,158		668,056		602,016		1,708,832		1,750,784		1,665,981		663,785			670,195			649,158		1,792,145			1,806,124			1,708,832
Total revenues	2,523,100		2,649,626		2,388,762		6,397,021		6,699,738		6,256,029		2,563,741			2,622,573			2,523,100		6,586,798			6,741,061			6,397,021
Less:
Commissions, transportation and other	413,156		435,432		396,916		1,093,409		1,150,556		1,068,961		400,933			410,399			413,156		1,060,391			1,086,888			1,093,409
Onboard and other	175,214		185,411		182,658		438,558		457,838		456,296		159,887			160,036			175,214		399,739			401,285			438,558
Net Revenues including divested businesses	1,934,730		2,028,783		1,809,188		4,865,054		5,091,344		4,730,772
Net Revenues including other initiative costs													2,002,921			2,052,138			1,934,730		5,126,668			5,252,888			4,865,054
Less:
Net Revenues related to divested businesses prior to sales transaction	—		—		—		—		—		35,656
Other initiative costs included within Net Revenues													(1,843		)	(1,790		)	—		(1,843		)	(1,790		)	—
Net Revenues	$	1,934,730	$	2,028,783	$	1,809,188	$	4,865,054	$	5,091,344	$	4,695,116	$	2,004,764		$	2,053,928		$	1,934,730	$	5,128,511		$	5,254,678		$	4,865,054

APCD	9,465,368		9,465,368		8,867,375		27,284,750		27,284,750		25,948,292		9,766,482			9,766,482			9,465,368		28,503,681			28,503,681			27,284,750
Gross Yields	$	266.56	$	279.93	$	269.39	$	234.45	$	245.55	$	241.10	$	262.50		$	268.53		$	266.56	$	231.09		$	236.50		$	234.45
Net Yields	$	204.40	$	214.34	$	204.03	$	178.31	$	186.60	$	180.94	$	205.27		$	210.30		$	204.40	$	179.92		$	184.35		$	178.31

Table of Contents

Gross Cruise Costs, Net Cruise Costs and Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel were calculated as follows (in thousands, except APCD and costs per APCD):


	Quarter Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Quarter Ended September 30,								Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2015		2015 On a Constant Currency Basis		2014		2015		2015 On a Constant Currency Basis		2014		2016			2016 On a Constant Currency Basis			2015		2016			2016 On a Constant Currency Basis			2015
Total cruise operating expenses	$	1,387,026	$	1,437,727	$	1,426,882	$	3,926,052	$	4,057,559	$	4,061,536	$	1,340,123		$	1,350,295		$	1,387,026	$	3,892,288		$	3,926,447		$	3,926,052
Marketing, selling and administrative expenses	256,060		264,558		239,662		817,040		846,229		790,957		257,430			260,471			256,060		845,808			856,941			817,040
Gross Cruise Costs	1,643,086		1,702,285		1,666,544		4,743,092		4,903,788		4,852,493		1,597,553			1,610,766			1,643,086		4,738,096			4,783,388			4,743,092
Less:
Commissions, transportation and other	413,156		435,432		396,916		1,093,409		1,150,556		1,068,961		400,933			410,399			413,156		1,060,391			1,086,888			1,093,409
Onboard and other	175,214		185,411		182,658		438,558		457,838		456,296		159,887			160,036			175,214		399,739			401,285			438,558
Net Cruise Costs including divested businesses	1,054,716		1,081,442		1,086,970		3,211,125		3,295,394		3,327,236
Net Cruise Costs including other initiative costs													1,036,733			1,040,331			1,054,716		3,277,966			3,295,215			3,211,125
Less:
Net Cruise Costs related to divested businesses prior to sales transaction	—		—		—		—		—		47,854
Other initiative costs included within cruise operating expenses and marketing, selling and administrative expenses	—		—		1,240		—		—		15,036		(2,252		)	(2,157		)	—		1,073			1,240			—
Loss on sale of ship included within other operating expenses	—		—		17,401		—		—		17,401
Net gain related to the sale of Pullmantur and CDF Croisières de France brands included within other operating expenses													(3,834		)	(3,834		)	—		(3,834		)	(3,834		)	—
Net Cruise Costs	1,054,716		1,081,442		1,068,329		3,211,125		3,295,394		3,246,945		1,042,819			1,046,322			1,054,716		3,280,727			3,297,809			3,211,125
Less:
Fuel	199,848		203,145		230,818		607,689		615,035		718,081
Fuel⁽¹⁾													178,772			178,742			199,848		530,859			531,836			607,689
Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel	$	854,868	$	878,297	$	837,511	$	2,603,436	$	2,680,359	$	2,528,864	$	864,047		$	867,580		$	854,868	$	2,749,868		$	2,765,973		$	2,603,436

APCD	9,465,368		9,465,368		8,867,375		27,284,750		27,284,750		25,948,292		9,766,482			9,766,482			9,465,368		28,503,681			28,503,681			27,284,750
Gross Cruise Costs per APCD	$	173.59	$	179.84	$	187.94	$	173.84	$	179.73	$	187.01	$	163.58		$	164.93		$	173.59	$	166.23		$	167.82		$	173.84
Net Cruise Cost per APCD	$	111.43	$	114.25	$	120.48	$	117.69	$	120.78	$	125.13	$	106.78		$	107.13		$	111.43	$	115.10		$	115.70		$	117.69
Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel per APCD	$	90.32	$	92.79	$	94.45	$	95.42	$	98.24	$	97.46	$	88.47		$	88.83		$	90.32	$	96.47		$	97.04		$	95.42

⁽¹⁾ For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, amount does not include fuel expense of $0.4 million included within other initiative costs associated with the redeployment of Pullmantur’s Empress to the Royal Caribbean International brand.

Table of Contents

~~2015~~2016 Outlook

The company does not make predictions about fuel pricing, interest rates or currency exchange rates but does provide guidance about its future business activities. On October ~~23, 2015,~~28, 2016, we announced the following fourth quarter and full year ~~and fourth quarter 2015~~2016 guidance based on the then current fuel pricing, interest rates and currency exchange ~~rates at that time:~~rates:

Full Year ~~2015~~2016



	As Reported	Constant Currency
Net Yields	1.7% to 2.0%	4.0% or better
Net Cruise Costs per APCD	Approx. (2.0%)	Approx. (1.5%)
Net Cruise Costs per APCD, Excluding Fuel	Approx. 0.5%	Approx. 1.0%
Capacity Increase	3.3%
Depreciation and Amortization	$890 to $900 million
Interest Expense, net	$287 to $292 million
Fuel Consumption (metric tons)	1,371,000
Fuel Expenses	$720 million
Percent Hedged (fwd consumption)	68%
Impact of 10% change in fuel prices	$4 million
1% Change in Currency	$4 million
1% Change in Net Yield	$15 million
1% Change in NCC x Fuel	$8 million
1% Change in LIBOR	$12 million
Adjusted Earnings per Share-Diluted	$6.00 to $6.10

Fourth Quarter 2016



	As Reported	Constant Currency
Net Yields	Approx. ~~(1.0%)~~4.5%	Approx. ~~3.5%~~6.0%
Net Cruise Costs per APCD	Approx. ~~(6.5%~~(1.5%)	~~Approx. (4.5%~~(1.0%) to (1.5%)
Net Cruise Costs per APCD, Excluding Fuel	~~(3.5%) to (2.5%~~Approx. (2.0%)	~~Flat to down 1.0%~~Approx. (1.5%)
Capacity Increase	~~5.4%~~(0.2%)
Depreciation and Amortization	$~~827~~230 to ~~$831~~$235 million
Interest Expense, net	$~~264~~75 to ~~$268~~$80 million
Fuel Consumption (metric tons)	~~1,363,000~~340,000
Fuel Expenses	$~~800~~189 million
Percent Hedged (fwd consumption)	~~57%~~68%
Impact of 10% change in fuel prices	$~~5.0~~4 million
1% Change in Currency	$4 million
1% Change in Net Yield	$15 million
1% Change in NCC x Fuel	$8 million
1% Change in LIBOR	$12 million
Adjusted Earnings per Share-Diluted	Approx. ~~$4.80~~$1.20

Adjusted Earnings per Share estimates for the Full Year and Fourth Quarter ~~2015~~



	~~As Reported~~	~~Constant Currency~~
~~Net Yields~~	~~1.3% to 1.8%~~	~~4.5% to 5.0%~~
~~Net Cruise Costs per APCD~~	~~Approx. (8.5%)~~	~~Approx. (7.5%)~~
~~Net Cruise Costs per APCD, Excluding Fuel~~	~~Approx. (5.0%)~~	~~Approx. (4.0%)~~
~~Capacity Increase~~	~~6.1%~~
~~Depreciation and Amortization~~	~~$210 to $214 million~~
~~Interest Expense, net~~	~~$59 to $63 million~~
~~Fuel Consumption (metric tons)~~	~~342,000~~
~~Fuel Expenses~~	~~$193 million~~
~~Percent Hedged (fwd consumption)~~	~~57%~~
~~Impact of 10% change in fuel prices~~	~~$5.0 million~~
~~Adjusted Earnings per Share-Diluted~~	~~Approx. $0.90~~

of 2016 are presented in lieu of US GAAP earnings per share estimates due to uncertainty in projecting the amounts adjusted to arrive at this measure, such as uncertainty in the amount and timing of restructuring charges and other initiative costs that we will absorb in the remainder of 2016, the amount of which is expected to be immaterial. Refer to Note 11. Restructuring Charges in our consolidated financial statements under Item 1. Financial Statements for further information on our restructuring charges and other initiative costs and to the definition for Adjusted Earnings per Share herein. For the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2016, we incurred restructuring charges and other initiative costs of $1.5 million and $9.9 million, respectively.

Volatility in foreign currency exchange rates affects the US dollar value of our earnings. Based on our highest net exposure for each quarter and the full year ~~2015,~~2016, the top five foreign currencies are ranked below. For example, the ~~British Pound~~Australian Dollar is the

Table of Contents

most impactful ~~in all quarters, except~~currency in the first ~~quarter~~and fourth quarters of ~~2015 where it is the fourth most impactful.~~2016. The first, second and third quarters of ~~2015~~2016 rankings are based on actual results. Rankings for the ~~remaining~~fourth quarter and full year are based on estimated net exposures.

Ranking

FY ~~2015~~2016

~~CAD~~AUD

GBP

~~GBP~~AUD

GBP

~~AUD~~CAD

AUD

~~EUR~~CNH

GBP

AUD

~~CAD~~

~~BRL~~GBP

CAD

~~CNY~~

~~CAD~~

~~AUD~~

~~GBP~~

EUR

CAD

CNH

CAD

EUR

~~BRL~~CNH

BRL

MXN

~~BRL~~

AUD

~~MXN~~CNH

~~CNY~~EUR

~~Table of Contents~~

The currency abbreviations above are defined as follows:



Currency Abbreviation		Currency
AUD		Australian Dollar
BRL		Brazilian Real
CAD		Canadian Dollar
~~CNY~~CNH		Chinese Yuan
EUR		Euro
GBP		British ~~Dollar~~Pound
MXN		Mexican Peso

Quarter Ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 Compared to Quarter Ended September 30, ~~2014~~2015

In this section, references to 2016 refer to the quarter ended September 30, 2016 and references to 2015 refer to the quarter ended September 30, ~~2015 and references to 2014 refer to the quarter ended September 30, 2014.~~2015.

Revenues

Total revenues for ~~2015~~2016 increased ~~$134.3~~$40.6 million, or ~~5.6%~~1.6%, ~~to $2.5 billion in 2015~~ from ~~$2.4 billion in 2014.~~2015.

Passenger ticket revenues comprised ~~74.3%~~74.1% of our ~~2015~~2016 total revenues. Passenger ticket revenues for ~~2015~~2016 increased by ~~$87.2~~$26.0 million, or ~~4.9%~~1.4%, from ~~2014.~~2015. The increase was primarily due ~~to:~~to

•a ~~6.7%~~3.2% increase in capacity, which increased passenger ticket revenues by $~~120.5 million, net of the unfavorable impact of the change in our voyage proration;~~59.6 million; and

an increase of $18.8 million in ticket prices ~~across most~~primarily driven by Harmony of ~~our core itineraries that contributed to a $74.3 million aggregate increase in~~the Seas ~~passenger ticket revenues.~~and Ovation of the Seas, as well as higher pricing on Alaska and Caribbean sailings.

The increase was partially offset by an approximate ~~$107.6~~$52.4 million unfavorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to our passenger ticket revenue transactions denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar.

The remaining ~~25.7%~~25.9% of ~~2015~~2016 total revenues was comprised of onboard and other revenues, which increased ~~$47.1~~$14.6 million, or ~~7.8%~~2.3%, to $663.8 million in 2016 from $649.2 million in ~~2015 from $602.0 million in 2014.~~2015. The increase in onboard and other revenues was primarily due to:

a ~~$39.4~~$19.9 million increase attributable to the ~~6.7%~~3.2% increase in capacity noted ~~above, net of the unfavorable impact of the change in our voyage proration;~~above; and

~~a $27.7~~an $8.9 million increase in onboard revenue attributable to higher spending on a per passenger basis primarily due to our ship upgrade programs and other revenue enhancing initiatives, including various beverage and gaming initiatives, the promotion of specialty restaurants and the increased revenue associated with internet and other telecommunication ~~services.~~services partially offset by a decrease in port activities revenue mainly due to itinerary changes.

The increase was partially offset by:

Table of Contents

a $7.8 million decrease in other revenues primarily due to our travel agency business that was sold in 2015, which is mostly offset by the related decrease in travel agency expenses discussed below; and

an approximate ~~$18.9~~$6.4 million unfavorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to our onboard and other revenue transactions denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar.

Onboard and other revenues included concession revenues of $86.6 million in 2016 and $98.9 million in ~~2015 and $84.1 million in 2014.~~2015.

Cruise Operating Expenses

Total cruise operating expenses for ~~2015~~2016 decreased ~~$39.9~~$46.9 million, or ~~2.8%~~3.4%, from ~~2014.~~2015. The decrease was primarily due to:

a ~~$43.2~~$27.5 million decrease in fuel expense, excluding the impact of the increase in capacity. ~~The price~~Our cost of fuel (net of the financial impact of fuel swap agreements) for ~~2015~~2016 decreased ~~14.2%~~11.3% per metric ton compared to ~~2014;~~2015;

33a $10.5 million decrease in payroll and related expenses primarily due to changes in our payroll structure;

~~Table of Contents~~

an approximate ~~$50.7~~$10.2 million favorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to our cruise operating expenses denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar;

~~a $17.4~~an $8.6 million ~~loss incurred in 2014 due to the sale of~~ ~~Celebrity Century~~ ~~that did not recur~~decrease in ~~2015;~~

~~an $11.3 million~~shore excursion expense attributable to lower contractual costs incurred and the decrease in port activities ~~expense mainly~~revenue discussed above;

a $7.1 million decrease in other expenses primarily related to our travel agency business that was sold in 2015, which mostly offsets the related decrease in travel agency revenues discussed above;

a $5.8 million decrease in vessel and hotel maintenance primarily due to ~~itinerary changes;~~the timing of scheduled drydocks; and

~~an $8.2~~

a $5.8 million decrease in air expense ~~mainly~~primarily due to ~~itinerary changes.~~the decrease in air transportation sales and lower costs.

The decrease was partially offset by a ~~$95.1~~$43.6 million increase attributable to the ~~6.7%~~3.2% increase in capacity noted ~~above, net of the favorable impact of the change in our voyage proration.~~above.

Marketing, Selling and Administrative Expenses

Marketing, selling and administrative expenses for ~~2015 increased $16.4 million, or 6.8%,~~2016 remained consistent compared to $256.1 million in 2015 from $239.7 million for the same period in 2014. The increase was primarily due to an increase in advertising spending mainly relating to our initiatives in the North American market, an increase in payroll and benefits primarily due to an increase in our stock price over the past year related to our performance share awards and higher IT labor costs resulting from the addition of projects and initiatives in 2015. The increase was partially offset by a decrease in administrative expenses mainly driven by the sale of Pullmantur's non-core businesses in 2014 and savings realized from our cost containment initiatives.

Depreciation and Amortization Expenses

Depreciation and amortization expenses for ~~2015~~2016 increased ~~$18.3~~$18.6 million, or ~~9.5%~~8.8%, to $229.3 million from $210.7 million ~~from $192.4 million~~ in ~~2014.~~2015. The increase was primarily due to the addition of ~~Quantum~~Ovation of the Seasand ~~and~~ ~~Anthem~~Harmony of the Seas into our fleet, and to a lesser extent, new shipboard additions associated with our ship upgrade ~~projects and, to a lesser extent, the acquisition of~~ ~~Brilliance of the Seas, which was previously under lease, partially offset by the sale of~~ ~~Celebrity Century~~ ~~in September 2014.~~projects.

Impairment of Pullmantur related assets

During 2015, we recognized an impairment charge of $411.3 million to write down Pullmantur's goodwill to its implied fair value and to write down trademarks and trade names and certain long-lived assets, consisting of three aircraft owned and operated by Pullmantur Air and two ships owned and operated by Pullmantur, to their fair value.

Restructuring Charges

We incurred restructuring charges of $1.9 million during 2016. Refer to Note 11. Restructuring Charges to our consolidated financial statements for further information on our restructuring activities.

Table of Contents

Other Income ~~(Expense)~~

Interest expense, net of interest capitalized for ~~2015~~2016 increased ~~$6.7~~$15.8 million, or ~~11.2%~~23.6%, to $82.6 million from $66.8 million ~~from $60.1 million~~ in ~~2014.~~2015. The increase was ~~primarily~~ due to a higher average debt level attributable to the financing of ~~Quantum~~Ovation of the Seas and ~~Anthem~~Harmony of the Seas.and higher interest rates in 2016 compared to 2015.

Other incomein ~~2015~~2016 was ~~$35.9~~$34.4 million compared to ~~$18.8~~$35.9 million in ~~2014.~~2015. The ~~increase~~decrease in income of ~~$17.1~~$1.4 million was primarily due to a $12.0 million deferred tax benefit recognized in 2015 due to the impairment of Pullmantur related assets discussed above. The decrease was partially offset by income of ~~$38.4~~$46.5 million from our equity method investments in ~~2015~~2016 compared to income of ~~$25.7~~$38.4 million in 2014, a net deferred tax benefit of $12.0 million resulting from the impairment of the Pullmantur related assets and an ineffectiveness gain of $0.2 million in 2015 compared to an ineffectiveness loss of $7.1 million in 2014 on our interest rate and fuel swaps. The increase in other income was partially offset by $5.8 million in foreign exchange losses from the remeasurement of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency in 2015 compared to a gain of $3.3 million in 2014.2015.

Net Yields

Net Yields remained consistent compared to ~~2014.~~2015. Net Yields increased ~~5.1%~~2.9% in ~~2015~~2016 compared to ~~2014~~2015 on a Constant Currency basis primarily due to the increase in passenger ticket and onboard and other revenues discussed above.

Net Cruise Costs

Net Cruise Costs decreased ~~1.3%~~1.1% in 2016 compared to ~~2014.~~2015 and Net Cruise Costs per APCD decreased ~~7.5%~~4.2% in ~~2015~~2016 compared to ~~2014~~2015 primarily due to the decrease in ~~fuel expense and the favorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to our cruise~~ operating expenses ~~denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar.~~discussed above. Net Cruise Costs per APCD on a Constant Currency basis decreased ~~5.2%~~3.9% in ~~2015~~2016 compared to ~~2014.~~2015.

~~Table of Contents~~

Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel

Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel per APCD decreased ~~4.4%~~2.0% in 2016 compared to ~~2014. Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel per APCD~~2015 and decreased 1.6% in 2016 compared to 2015 on a Constant Currency ~~basis decreased 1.8% due to a decrease in cruise operating expenses as discussed above.~~basis.

Other Comprehensive Income ~~(loss)~~(Loss)

Other comprehensive ~~loss~~ income~~decreased by $46.2~~ in 2016 was $94.5 million compared to Other comprehensive loss of $223.4 million in ~~2015 compared to 2014~~2015. The change of $317.9 million was primarily due to ~~a $27.1 million decrease in losses mostly~~the Gain on ~~our~~ cash flow derivative hedges ~~resulting from~~ in 2016 of $95.5 million compared to the ~~settlement of fuel~~Loss on cash flow derivative hedges of $222.5 million in ~~a loss position during 2015 and a $14.3 million decrease in foreign currency translation losses.~~2015.

Nine Months Ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, ~~2014~~2015

In this section, references to 2016 refer to the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and references to 2015 refer to the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015 and references to 2014 refer to the nine months ended September 30, 2014.~~2015.

Revenues

Total revenues for ~~2015~~2016 increased ~~$141.0~~$189.8 million, or ~~2.3%~~3.0%, to $6.6 billion from ~~2014.~~$6.4 billion in 2015.

Passenger ticket revenues comprised ~~73.3%~~72.8% of our ~~2015~~2016 total revenues. Passenger ticket revenues for ~~2015~~2016 increased by ~~$98.1~~$106.5 million, or ~~2.1%~~2.3%, from ~~2014.~~2015. The increase was primarily due to:

a ~~5.2%~~4.5% increase in capacity, which increased passenger ticket revenues by $~~236.4 million, net of the unfavorable impact of the change in our voyage proration;~~209.4 million; and

an increase of ~~$122.5~~$37.3 million in ticket prices primarily driven by ~~Quantum~~Harmony of the Seas, Ovation of the Seas and, to a lesser extent, Anthem of the Seas, as well as higher pricing on ~~Europe,~~ Alaska and ~~Bermuda~~Caribbean sailings. The increase in ticket prices was partially offset by lower pricing on Mediterranean and Asia sailings.

The increase was partially offset by an approximate ~~$260.8~~$140.3 million unfavorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to our passenger ticket revenue transactions denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar.

The remaining ~~26.7%~~27.2% of ~~2015~~2016 total revenues was comprised of onboard and other revenues, which increased ~~$42.9~~$83.3 million, or ~~2.6%~~4.9%, in ~~2015~~2016 from ~~2014.~~2015. The increase in onboard and other revenues was primarily due to:

~~an $81.5~~a $73.6 million increase attributable to the ~~5.2%~~4.5% increase in capacity noted ~~above, net~~above; and

Table of ~~the unfavorable impact of the change in our voyage proration; and~~Contents

a ~~$33.0~~$58.7 million increase in onboard revenue attributable to higher spending on a per passenger basis primarily due to our ship upgrade programs and other revenue enhancing initiatives, including various beverage and gaming initiatives, the promotion of specialty restaurants and the increased revenue associated with internet and other telecommunication ~~services.~~services partially offset by a decrease in port activities revenue mainly due to itinerary changes.

The increase was partially offset by:

a $34.0 million decrease in other revenues primarily related to our travel agency business that was sold in 2015, which is mostly offset by the related decrease in travel agency expenses discussed below; and

an approximate ~~$41.9~~$14.0 million unfavorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to our onboard and other revenue transactions denominated in currencies other than the US ~~dollar; and~~

~~a $37.2 million decrease in revenues related to Pullmantur's non-core businesses that were sold in 2014.~~dollar.

Onboard and other revenues included concession revenues of $240.8 million in 2016 and $245.4 million in ~~2015 and $238.8 million in 2014.~~2015.

Cruise Operating Expenses

Total cruise operating expenses decreased ~~$135.5~~$33.8 million, or ~~3.3%, to $3.9 billion in 2015 from $4.1 billion in 2014.~~0.9%. The decrease was primarily due to:

a ~~$140.0~~$102.5 million decrease in fuel expense, excluding the impact of the increase in capacity. ~~The price~~Our cost of fuel (net of the financial impact of fuel swap agreements) for ~~2015~~2016 decreased ~~15.5%~~12.6% per metric ton compared to ~~2014;~~2015;

~~Table of Contents~~

an approximate ~~$131.5~~$34.2 million favorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to our cruise operating expenses denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar;

a ~~$37.9~~$26.2 million decrease in other expenses primarily related to ~~Pullmantur's non-core businesses~~our travel agency business that ~~were~~was sold in ~~2014; and~~2015, which mostly offsets the related decrease in travel agency revenues discussed above;

a ~~$17.4~~$17.2 million ~~loss~~ decrease in shore excursion expense attributable to lower contractual costs incurred and the decrease in ~~2014~~port activities revenue discussed above; and

a $14.8 million decrease in air expense primarily due to the ~~sale of~~ ~~Celebrity Century~~ ~~that did not recur~~decrease in ~~2015.~~

air transportation sales and lower costs.

The decrease was ~~partially~~mostly offset by a ~~$205.6~~$173.0 million increase attributable to ~~a 5.2%~~the 4.5% increase in capacity noted ~~above, net of the favorable impact of the change in our voyage proration.~~above.

Marketing, Selling and Administrative Expenses

Marketing, selling and administrative expenses increased ~~$26.1~~$28.8 million, or ~~3.3%~~3.5%, to $845.8 million from $817.0 million ~~from $791.0 million~~ in ~~2014.~~2015. The increase was primarily due to an increase in payroll and benefits primarily due to an increase in headcount and merit increases, an increase in advertising spending mainly relating to our initiatives in the North American ~~Australian~~market and ~~Asian markets,~~ an increase in ~~payroll and benefits primarily due~~other initiative costs associated with our restructuring activities. Refer to ~~an increase in our stock price over the past year related~~Note.11 Restructuring Charges to our performance share awards and higher IT labor costs resulting from the addition of projects and initiatives in 2015. The increase was partially offset by a decrease in administrative expenses mainly driven by the sale of Pullmantur's non-core businesses in 2014 and savings realized fromconsolidated financial statements for further information on our ~~cost containment initiatives.~~restructuring activities.

Depreciation and Amortization Expenses

Depreciation and amortization expenses for ~~2015~~2016 increased ~~$38.6~~$44.0 million, or ~~6.7%~~7.1%, to $661.7 million from $617.7 million ~~from $579.1 million~~ in ~~2014.~~2015. The increase was primarily due to the addition of ~~Quantum~~Ovation of the Seas and Harmony of the Seas in the second quarter of 2016 into our fleet and the addition of Anthem of the Seas ~~into our fleet,~~in the second quarter of 2015 and, to a lesser extent, new shipboard additions associated with our ship upgrade ~~projects and the acquisition of the~~ ~~Brilliance of the Seas, which was previously under lease, partially offset by the sale of~~ ~~Celebrity Century~~ ~~in September 2014.~~projects.

Impairment of Pullmantur related assets

Restructuring Charges

Table of Contents

We incurred restructuring charges of ~~approximately $2.0~~$6.6 million in ~~2014, which did not recur in 2015.~~2016. Refer to Note 11. Restructuring Charges to our consolidated financial statements for further information on our restructuring activities.

Other Income ~~(Expense)~~

Interest expense, net of interest capitalized, for ~~2015~~2016 increased ~~$19.7~~$13.2 million, or ~~10.1%~~6.2%, to $226.8 million from $213.6 million ~~from $193.9 million~~ in ~~2014.~~2015. The increase was ~~primarily~~ due to a higher average debt level attributable to the financing of ~~Quantum~~Ovation of the Seas and ~~Anthem~~Harmony of the Seas, partially offset by lower pricing on debt refinanced in ~~2014.~~2015.

Other income in ~~2015~~2016 was ~~$39.4~~$53.9 million compared to ~~$17.8~~$39.4 million in ~~2014.~~2015. The increase in income of ~~$21.6~~$14.5 million was primarily due to income of ~~$62.2~~$94.8 million from our equity method investments in ~~2015~~2016 compared to income of ~~$34.7~~$62.2 million in ~~2014 and a net deferred tax benefit of $12.0 million resulting from the impairment of the Pullmantur related assets.~~2015. The increase in other income was partially offset by ~~$17.9~~the net loss of $21.7 million ~~in foreign exchange losses from~~related to the ~~remeasurement~~elimination of ~~monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency in 2015 compared to $3.6 million in gains in 2014.~~the Pullmantur reporting lag.

Net Yields

Net Yields ~~decreased 1.5%~~increased 0.9% in ~~2015~~2016 compared to 2014 primarily due to the unfavorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to our passenger ticket revenue transactions denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar noted above. Net Yields increased 3.1% in 2015 ~~compared to 2014 on a Constant Currency basis~~ primarily due to the increase in passenger ticket and onboard and other revenues discussed above. Net Yields increased 3.4% in 2016 compared to 2015 on a Constant Currency basis.

Net Cruise Costs

Net Cruise Costs ~~decreased 1.1%~~increased 2.2% in ~~2015~~2016 compared to ~~2014~~2015 primarily due to the ~~favorable effect of changes~~increase in ~~foreign currency exchange rates related to our cruise operating expenses denominated in currencies other than~~capacity, partially offset by the ~~United States dollar and the~~

~~Table of Contents~~

decrease in fuel, ~~partially offset by an increase in capacity.~~which are further discussed above. Net Cruise Costs per APCD decreased ~~5.9%~~2.2% in ~~2015~~2016 compared to ~~2014.~~2015 primarily due to the decrease in fuel. Net Cruise Costs per APCD on a Constant Currency basis decreased ~~3.5%~~1.7% in ~~2015~~2016 compared to ~~2014.~~2015.

Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel

Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel per APCD ~~decreased 2.1%~~increased 1.1% in ~~2015~~2016 compared to ~~2014~~2015 and ~~remained consistent~~increased 1.7% in ~~2015~~2016 compared to ~~2014~~2015 on a Constant Currency basis.

Other Comprehensive ~~Loss~~Income (Loss)

Other comprehensive income in 2016 was $250.9 millioncompared to Other comprehensive loss ~~decreased by $47.2~~of $299.4 million in ~~2015 compared to 2014~~2015. The change of $550.3 million was primarily due to a ~~$42.2 million decrease in losses mostly~~Gain on cash flow derivative hedges ~~resulting from the settlement~~ in 2016 of ~~fuel~~$254.6 million compared to a Loss on cash flow derivative hedges of $281.0 million in ~~a loss position during~~ 2015. The decrease in losses was partially offset by a $6.1 million increase in foreign currency translation losses resulting from the strengthening of the US dollar compared to the functional currencies of our foreign investments.

Table of Contents

Future Application of Accounting Standards

Refer to Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our consolidated financial statements for further information on Recent Accounting Pronouncements.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Sources and Uses of Cash

Cash flow generated from operations provides us with a significant source of liquidity. Net cash provided by operating activities increased ~~$0.1~~$0.4 billion to ~~$1.6~~$2.0 billion for the first nine months in ~~2015~~2016 compared to ~~$1.5~~$1.6 billion for the same period in ~~2014.~~2015. The increase in cash provided by operating activities was primarily attributable to an increase in ~~cash receipts~~proceeds from customer deposits and a decrease in fuel costs ~~and interest paid for~~during the first nine months in ~~2015~~2016 compared to the same period in ~~2014.~~2015. Additionally, dividends received from unconsolidated affiliates increased by $66.0 million.

Net cash used in investing activities ~~was $1.5~~increased $1.0 billion to $2.5 billion for the first nine months in ~~2015~~2016 compared to ~~$0.3~~$1.5 billion for the same period in ~~2014.~~2015. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in capital expenditures of ~~$801.6~~$953.2 million for the first nine months in ~~2015~~2016 compared to the same period in ~~2014~~2015 primarily due to the ~~delivery~~deliveries of ~~Anthem~~Ovation of the Seasand ~~$220.0 million~~Harmony of ~~proceeds received from~~ the ~~sale of~~ ~~Celebrity Century~~Seas in ~~2014 that did not recur in 2015. In addition,~~2016. Additionally, cash received on loans to our unconsolidated affiliates decreased $100.2 million during the first nine months of 2015, we paid $158.9 million on settlements on our foreign currency forward contracts compared to $14.8 million during the same period in 2014. The increase was partially offset by an increase in cash received on loans to unconsolidated affiliates of $46.5 million for the first nine months in 20152016 compared to the same period in ~~2014.~~2015.

Net cash ~~used in~~provided by financing activities was ~~$0.2~~$0.6 billion for the first nine months in ~~2015~~2016 compared to~~$1.1~~net cash used in financing activities of $0.2 billion for the same period in ~~2014. This change~~2015. The increase in cash provided by financing activities was primarily ~~due~~attributable to an increase in debt proceeds of ~~$1.0~~$3.1 billion ~~a decrease in repayment~~during the first nine months of ~~debt of $71.2 million,~~2016, partially offset by an increase in repayment of debt of $1.9 billion, stock repurchases of $0.3 billion that did not occur during the same period in 2015 and an increase in dividends paid of ~~$65.9 million.~~$45.8 million during the first nine months of 2016. The increase in debt proceeds was primarily due to the ~~$742.1~~$841.8 million unsecured term loan borrowed in April ~~2015~~2016 to finance Ovation of the ~~purchase of~~ Sea~~Anthem~~s, the €700.7 million and $226.1 million unsecured term loans borrowed in May 2016 to finance Harmony of the Seas, the $200.0 million unsecured term loan borrowed in April 2016 and higher drawings on our revolving credit facilities during the first nine months of ~~2015~~2016 compared to ~~proceeds received on our $380.0~~the $742.1 million unsecured term loan ~~facility during~~borrowed in April 2015 to finance Anthem of the ~~first nine months of 2014.~~Seas. The ~~decrease~~increase in repayment of debt was primarily due to ~~the payment at maturity of our €745.0 million 5.625% unsecured senior notes during the first nine months of 2014 that did not recur in 2015, mostly offset by~~ higher payments on our revolving credit ~~facilities and a bond maturity payment during the first nine months of 2015.~~facilities.

Table of Contents

Future Capital Commitments

Capital Expenditures

As of September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, our brands, including our 50% joint venture, TUI Cruises, had ~~ten~~eight ships on firm order. The expected dates that ~~our~~these ships ~~on order~~ will enter service and their approximate berths are as follows:



Ship	Expected to Enter Service	Approximate Berths
Royal Caribbean International —
Quantum-class:
~~Ovation of the Seas~~Unnamed	2nd Quarter ~~2016~~2019	4,150
Unnamed	~~2nd~~4th Quarter ~~2019~~2020	4,150
Oasis-class:
~~Harmony of the Seas~~	~~2nd Quarter 2016~~	~~5,450~~
Unnamed	2nd Quarter 2018	5,450
Celebrity Cruises — Project Edge
Unnamed	4th Quarter 2018	2,900
Unnamed	1st Half 2020	2,900
TUI Cruises (50% joint venture)
Mein Schiff 5	~~2nd Quarter 2016~~	~~2,500~~
~~Mein Schiff~~ 6	2nd Quarter 2017	2,500
Unnamed	2nd Quarter 2018	2,850
Unnamed	2nd Quarter 2019	2,850
	Total Berths	~~35,700~~27,750

In September 2016, we signed conditional agreements with STX France to build a fifth Oasis-class ship expected to be delivered in the second quarter of 2021, and a third and fourth "Project Edge" ship expected to be delivered in the fourth quarter of each of 2021 and 2022. These agreements are contingent upon completion of conditions precedent, including financing.

Additionally, in October 2016, we signed a memorandum of understanding with Meyer Turku to build two ships of a new generation of ships for Royal Caribbean International, known as "Project Icon", which are expected to enter service in the second quarters of 2022 and 2024, respectively. While the design is still being finalized, each ship will likely accommodate approximately 5,000 guests. These orders are contingent upon completion of conditions precedent, including documentation and financing.

Our future capital commitments consist primarily of new ship orders. As of September 30, 2015, we had two Quantum-class ships and two Oasis-class ships on order for our Royal Caribbean International brand with an aggregate capacity of approximately 19,200 berths. In October 2015, our conditional agreements with STX France to build two ships of a new generation of Celebrity Cruises ships, known as "Project Edge" became effective. The ships will each have a capacity of approximately 2,900 berths. Refer to Note 6. ~~Long-Term Debt~~ ~~for further information.~~

~~As of September 30, 2015,~~2016, the aggregate cost of our ships on firm order, not including ~~the "Project Edge" ships and~~ the TUI Cruises' ships on order and those subject to conditions to effectiveness, was approximately ~~$5.0~~$5.3 billion, of which we had deposited ~~$449.8~~$282.0 million as of such date. Approximately ~~43.7%~~56.1% of the aggregate cost was exposed to fluctuations in the Euro exchange rate at September 30, ~~2015.~~2016. Refer to ~~Note 7.~~ ~~Commitments and Contingencies~~ ~~and~~ Note 10. Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments to our consolidated financial statements under Item 1. Financial Statements.for further information.

As of September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, we anticipate overall full year capital expenditures, excluding the above mentioned ship orders subject to conditions to effectiveness and TUI Cruises' ships on order, will be approximately ~~$1.6 billion for 2015, $2.3~~$2.4 billion for 2016, $0.5 billion for 2017, ~~$2.4~~$2.6 billion for 2018, ~~and $1.3~~$1.5 billion for ~~2019.~~2019 and $2.0 billion for 2020.

Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations

As of September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, our contractual obligations were as follows (in thousands):


	Payments due by period										Payments due by period
			Less than		1-3		3-5		More than				Less than		1-3		3-5		More than
	Total		1 year		years		years		5 years		Total		1 year		years		years		5 years
Operating Activities:
Operating lease obligations⁽¹⁾	$	235,514	$	22,758	$	37,342	$	24,222	$	151,192	$	232,661	$	21,300	$	31,792	$	25,659	$	153,910
Interest on long-term debt⁽²⁾	1,181,354		232,578		368,996		242,826		336,954		1,358,964		284,590		433,451		291,739		349,184
Other⁽³⁾	811,077		163,196		337,298		192,460		118,123		834,220		172,938		340,044		180,954		140,284
Investing Activities:	0										0
Ship purchase obligations⁽⁴⁾	3,510,290		1,648,338		1,112,780		749,172		—		4,063,001		37,944		2,655,244		1,369,813		—
Financing Activities:	0										0
Long-term debt obligations⁽⁵⁾	8,438,804		896,440		3,021,637		1,830,372		2,690,355		9,475,483		1,090,558		2,870,327		2,417,486		3,097,112
Capital lease obligations⁽⁶⁾	51,132		8,688		11,690		7,209		23,545		42,369		7,444		7,614		7,865		19,446
Other⁽⁷⁾	79,057		21,483		35,001		18,607		3,966		60,413		19,676		28,589		11,263		885
Total	$	14,307,228	$	2,993,481	$	4,924,744	$	3,064,868	$	3,324,135	$	16,067,111	$	1,634,450	$	6,367,061	$	4,304,779	$	3,760,821


(1)	We are obligated under noncancelable operating leases primarily for offices, warehouses and motor vehicles. Amounts represent contractual obligations with initial terms in excess of one year.

(2)

Long-term debt obligations mature at various dates through fiscal year ~~2027~~2028 and bear interest at fixed and variable rates. Interest on variable-rate debt is calculated based on forecasted debt balances, including the impact of interest ~~swapped~~rate swap agreements using the applicable rate at September 30, ~~2015.~~2016. Debt denominated in other currencies is calculated based on the applicable exchange rate at September 30, ~~2015.~~2016.


(3)	Amounts primarily represent future commitments with remaining terms in excess of one year to pay for our usage of certain port facilities, marine consumables, services and maintenance contracts.


(4)	Amounts do not include potential obligations which remain subject to cancellation at our sole ~~discretion~~discretion. In addition, amounts do not include the conditional agreements with STX France for the fifth Oasis-class ship and the third and fourth "Project Edge" ships and the conditional orders with Meyer Turku for the two "Project Icon" ships.

~~our conditional agreements with STX France for the "Project Edge" ships that became effective in October 2015.~~


(5)	Amounts represent debt obligations with initial terms in excess of one year.


(6)	Amounts represent capital lease obligations with initial terms in excess of one year.


(7)	Amounts represent fees payable to sovereign guarantors in connection with certain of our export credit debt facilities and facility fees on our revolving credit facilities.

As a normal part of our business, depending on market conditions, pricing and our overall growth strategy, we continuously consider opportunities to enter into contracts for the building of additional ships. We may also consider the sale of ships or the purchase of existing ships. We continuously consider potential acquisitions and strategic alliances. If any of these were to occur, they would be financed through the incurrence of additional indebtedness, the issuance of additional shares of equity securities or through cash flows from operations.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We and TUI AG have each guaranteed repayment of 50% of a bank loan provided to TUI Cruises which is due 2022. Notwithstanding this, the lenders have agreed to release each shareholder’s guarantee in 2018. As of September 30, ~~2015, €142.7~~2016, €121.6 million, or approximately ~~$159.3~~$136.6 million based on the exchange rate at September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, remains outstanding. Based on current facts and circumstances, we do not believe potential obligations under this guarantee are probable.

TUI Cruises has entered into various ship construction and credit agreements that include certain restrictions on each of our and TUI AG’s ability to reduce our current ownership interest in TUI Cruises below 37.55% through 2021.

In July 2016, we executed an agreement with Miami Dade County (“MDC”), which was simultaneously assigned to Sumitomo Banking Corporation (“SMBC”), to lease land from MDC and construct a new cruise terminal at PortMiami in Miami, Florida. The terminal is expected to be approximately 170,000 square feet and will serve as a homeport. During the construction period, SMBC will fund the costs of the terminal’s construction and land lease. Upon completion of the terminal's construction, we will

Table of Contents

operate and lease the terminal from SMBC for a five-year term. We determined that the lease arrangement between SMBC and us should be accounted for as an operating lease upon completion of the terminal.

Some of the contracts that we enter into include indemnification provisions that obligate us to make payments to the counterparty if certain events occur. These contingencies generally relate to changes in taxes, increased lender capital costs and other similar costs. The indemnification clauses are often standard contractual terms and are entered into in the normal course of business. There are no stated or notional amounts included in the indemnification clauses and we are not able to estimate the maximum potential amount of future payments, if any, under these indemnification clauses. We have not been required to make

~~Table of Contents~~

any payments under such indemnification clauses in the past and, under current circumstances, we do not believe an indemnification obligation is probable.

~~Other~~As of September 30, 2016, other than the items described above, we are not party to any other off-balance sheet arrangements, including guarantee contracts, retained or contingent interest, certain derivative instruments and variable interest entities, that either have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future material effect on our financial position.

Funding Needs and Sources

We have significant contractual obligations of which our debt service obligations and the capital expenditures associated with our ship purchases represent our largest funding needs. As of September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, we had approximately ~~$3.0~~$1.6 billion in contractual obligations due through September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, of which approximately ~~$0.9~~$1.1 billion relates to debt maturities, ~~$1.6 billion relates to the acquisition of~~ ~~Harmony of the Seas~~ ~~and~~ ~~Ovation of the Seas~~ ~~along with progress payments on our other ship purchases and $232.6~~$284.6 million relates to interest on long-term ~~debt.~~debt and $37.9 million relates to progress payments on our ship purchases. We have historically relied on a combination of cash flows provided by operations, drawdowns under our available credit facilities, the incurrence of additional debt and/or the refinancing of our existing debt and the issuance of additional shares of equity securities to fund these obligations.

As of September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, we had on firm order two Quantum-class ships and one Oasis-class ship for our Royal Caribbean International brand and our first two ~~Oasis-class~~"Project Edge" ships for our Celebrity brand, each of which has committed unsecured bank financing arrangements which include sovereign financing guarantees. Refer to Note 7. Commitments and Contingencies to our consolidated financial statements for further information.

We had a working capital deficit of $3.7 billion and $3.5 billion as of September 30, ~~2015 as compared to a working capital deficit of $3.0 billion as of~~2016 and December 31, ~~2014.~~2015, respectively. Included within our working capital deficit is ~~$0.9~~$1.3 billion and ~~$0.8 billion~~$899.5 million of current portion of long-term debt, including capital leases, as of September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and December 31, ~~2014,~~2015, respectively. ~~The increase in working capital deficit was primarily due to the increase in current liabilities of our foreign currency forward contracts and long-term debt.~~ Similar to others in our industry, we operate with a substantial working capital deficit. This deficit is mainly attributable to the fact that, under our business model, a vast majority of our passenger ticket receipts are collected in advance of the applicable sailing date. These advance passenger receipts remain a current liability until the sailing date. The cash generated from these advance receipts is used interchangeably with cash on hand from other sources, such as our revolving credit facilities and other cash from operations. The cash received as advanced receipts can be used to fund operating expenses for the applicable future sailing or otherwise, pay down our revolving credit facilities, invest in long term investments or any other use of cash. In addition, we have a relatively low-level of accounts receivable and rapid turnover results in a limited investment in inventories. We generate substantial cash flows from operations and our business model, along with our unsecured revolving credit facilities, has historically allowed us to maintain this working capital deficit and still meet our operating, investing and financing needs. We expect that we will continue to have working capital deficits in the future.

In July 2015, we amended our $1.2 billion unsecured revolving credit facility due August 2018 to reduce pricing in line with the pricing of the $1.1 billion unsecured revolving credit facility amended in June 2015. At the same time, we also amended our $380.0 million, €365.0 million, $290.0 million and $65.0 million unsecured term loans due at various dates from 2016 through 2019 to reduce the applicable margins, now each 1.75% based on our current debt rating. We also extended the termination date of the $290 million unsecured term loan from February 2016 to February 2018. Refer to Note 6. ~~Long-Term Debt~~ ~~to our consolidated financial statementsfor further information.~~

As of September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, we had liquidity of ~~$1.0~~$1.1 billion, consisting of approximately ~~$147.4~~$178.4 million in cash and cash equivalents and ~~$858.0~~$898.0 million available under our unsecured credit facilities. Additionally, in October 2015, we received increased lender commitments for our unsecured revolving credit facility due June 2020 in the amount of $300 million, bringing our total capacity under this facility to $1.4 billion.

We anticipate that our cash flows from operations and our current financing arrangements, as described above, will be adequate to meet our capital expenditures and debt repayments over the next twelve-month period.

In October 2015, our board of directors authorized a common stock repurchase program for up to $500 ~~million. On October 23, 2015,~~million that was completed in August 2016. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we ~~executed an agreement with an investment bank to purchase~~purchased a total of ~~$200~~$300.0 million ~~of the $500 million authorized amount,~~ of our common stock through open market transactions. Our repurchases under ~~an accelerated~~this program, including the $200.0 million of stock repurchase (ASR) transaction. Repurchases under the program are expected to be funded from available cash or borrowings under our revolving credit facilities. Under the terms of the ASR agreement, we will receive upfront the majority of the shares of our common stock to be repurchased ~~based on current market prices in~~

~~Table of Contents~~

exchange for a prepayment of $200 million. The final number of shares to be repurchased will be determined upon settlement based on the average of the daily volume-weighted average prices of our common stock during the ~~term~~fourth quarter of the transaction, less a discount (the "Final Repurchase Price"). Upon final settlement, which is expected no later than the end of January 2016, and depending on the Final Repurchase Price, the investment bank may be required to deliver additional shares of common stock to us or we may be required to deliver shares of common stock or to make a cash payment, at our election, to the investment bank. Future stock repurchase transactions could include open market purchases or additional accelerated share repurchases. We expect to complete the program by the end of 2016. Refer to Note 8. ~~Shareholders' Equity~~ ~~to our consolidated financial statementsfor further information.~~2015, totaled $500.0 million.

Table of Contents

acquisition of greater than 50% of our common stock ~~by (i) any person or (ii) in the case of our public debt securities, by a person other than a member of the Applicable Group~~ coupled with a ratings downgrade. If this were to occur, it would have an adverse impact on our liquidity and operations.

Debt Covenants

Certain of our financing agreements contain covenants that require us, among other things, to maintain minimum net worth of at least ~~$6.5~~$7.1 billion, a fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.25x and limit our net debt-to-capital ratio to no more than 62.5%. The fixed charge coverage ratio is calculated by dividing net cash from operations for the past four quarters by the sum of dividend payments plus scheduled principal debt payments in excess of any new financings for the past four quarters. Our minimum net worth and maximum net debt-to-capital calculations exclude the impact of Accumulated other comprehensive loss on Total shareholders’ equity. We were well in excess of all debt covenant requirements as of September 30, ~~2015.~~2016. The specific covenants and related definitions can be found in the applicable debt agreements, the majority of which have been previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Table of Contents

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

For a discussion of our market risks, refer to Part II, Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2014.~~2015. There have been no significant developments or material changes since the date of our Annual Report.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e), as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon such evaluation, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that those controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and are effective to provide reasonable assurance that such information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC’s rules and forms.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by ~~paragraph (d) of~~ Exchange Act Rule ~~13a-15~~13a-15(d) during the quarter ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls

Readers are cautioned that any system of controls, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system will be met. In addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events. Because of these and other inherent limitations of control systems, there is only reasonable assurance that our controls will succeed in achieving their goals under all potential future conditions.

Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

~~As previously~~There were no material developments to the pending legal proceedings reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2014, a class action complaint was filed in June 2011 against Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. in the United States District Court~~2015 and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the ~~Southern District~~quarter ended March 31, 2016. Refer to Note 7. Commitments and Contingencies to our consolidated financial statements for a description of Florida on behalf of a purported class of stateroom attendants employed onboard Royal Caribbean International cruise vessels. The complaint alleged that the stateroom attendants were required to pay other crew members to help with their duties and that certain stateroom attendants were required to work back of house assignments without the ability to earn gratuities, in each case in violation of the U.S. Seaman’s Wage Act. In May 2012, the district court granted our motion to dismiss the complaint on the basis that the applicable collective bargaining agreement requires any such claims to be arbitrated. The United States Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit, affirmed the district court’s dismissal and denied the plaintiffs’ petition for re-hearing and re-hearing en banc. In October 2014, the United States Supreme Court denied the plaintiffs’ request to review the order compelling arbitration. Subsequently, approximately 575 crew members submitted demands for arbitration. The demands make substantially the same allegations as in the federal court complaint and are similarly seeking damages, wage penalties and interest in an indeterminate amount. Unlike the federal court complaint, the demands for arbitration are being brought individually by each of the crew members and not on behalf of a purported class of stateroom attendants. At this time, we are unable to estimate the possible impact of this matter on us. However, we believe the underlying claims made against us are without merit, and we intend to vigorously defend ourselves against them.currently pending legal proceedings.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The risk factors that affect our business and financial results are discussed in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the ~~2014~~ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 and there has been no material change to these risk factors since previously disclosed. We wish to caution the reader that the risk factors discussed in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our ~~2014~~2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K, and those described elsewhere in this report or other SEC filings, could cause future results to differ materially from those stated in any forward-looking statements.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Share Repurchases

The following table presents the total number of shares of our common stock that we repurchased during the quarter ended September 30, 2016:



Period	Total number of shares purchased	Average price paid per share	Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs⁽¹⁾	Approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs
July 1, 2016 - July 31, 2016	—	—	—	$50,000,000
August 1, 2016 - August 31, 2016	706,715	$70.60	706,715	$—
September 1, 2016 - September 30, 2016	—	—	—	$—
Total	706,715		706,715

⁽¹⁾In October 2015, our board of directors authorized a common stock repurchase program for up to $500 million that was completed in August 2016. For further information on our stock repurchase transactions, please refer to Note 8. Shareholders' Equity to our consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits




31.1			Certification of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934*

31.2			Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934*

32.1			Certifications of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code**



*		Filed herewith
**		Furnished herewith

Interactive Data File

101 The following financial statements ~~from~~of Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.~~’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q~~ for the quarter ended September 30, ~~2015, as filed with the SEC on October 23, 2015,~~2016, formatted in XBRL ~~as follows:~~are filed herewith:

(i) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the quarter ~~ended September 30, 2015~~ and ~~2014;~~

~~(ii)the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the~~ nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014;~~2015;


~~(iii)~~(ii)	the Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and December 31, ~~2014;~~2015;

~~(iv)~~(iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014;~~2015; and

~~(v)~~(iv) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged in summary and detail.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



		ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD.
		(Registrant)


		/s/ JASON T. LIBERTY
		Jason T. Liberty
		Chief Financial Officer
October ~~23, 2015~~28, 2016		(Principal Financial Officer and duly authorized signatory)

4447



	Page

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements	1

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	2225

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	4144

Item 4. Controls and Procedures	4144

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings	4245

Item 1A. Risk Factors	4245

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	45

Item 6. Exhibits	4346

SIGNATURES	4447



	Goodwill			Intangibles
Balance at December 31, 2014	$	133,583		$	188,037
Impairment of Pullmantur related assets	(123,814		)	(174,285		)
Foreign currency translation adjustment	(9,769		)	(13,752		)
Balance at September 30, 2015	$	—		$	—

Large accelerated filer x

Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o

Smaller reporting company o

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)