UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)



ý	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017



o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 1-11884

ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Republic of Liberia		98-0081645
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1050 Caribbean Way, Miami, Florida 33132

(Address of principal executive offices) (zip code)

(305) 539-6000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, ~~or a~~ smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated ~~filer”~~filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and ~~“smaller reporting~~“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý

There were ~~214,582,024~~214,088,950 shares of common stock outstanding as of October ~~20, 2016.~~30, 2017.

Table of Contents

ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(unaudited; in thousands, except per share data)


	Quarter Ended September 30,						Quarter Ended September 30,
	2016			2015			2017			2016
Passenger ticket revenues	$	1,899,956		$	1,873,942		$	1,893,152		$	1,899,956
Onboard and other revenues	663,785			649,158			676,392			663,785
Total revenues	2,563,741			2,523,100			2,569,544			2,563,741
Cruise operating expenses:
Commissions, transportation and other	400,933			413,156			409,597			400,933
Onboard and other	159,887			175,214			157,041			159,887
Payroll and related	214,081			217,627			210,764			214,081
Food	125,732			122,124			126,223			125,732
Fuel	178,772			199,848			160,752			178,772
Other operating	260,718			259,057			253,892			260,718
Total cruise operating expenses	1,340,123			1,387,026			1,318,269			1,340,123
Marketing, selling and administrative expenses	257,430			256,060			273,637			259,327
Depreciation and amortization expenses	229,328			210,742			240,150			229,328
Impairment of Pullmantur related assets	—			411,267
Restructuring charges	1,897			—
Operating Income	734,963			258,005			737,488			734,963
Other income (expense):
Interest income	6,472			1,735			4,693			6,472
Interest expense, net of interest capitalized	(82,610		)	(66,819		)	(73,233		)	(82,610		)
Other income (including in 2015 a net deferred tax benefit of $12.0 million related to the Pullmantur impairment)	34,432			35,866
Equity investment income							85,120			46,539
Other expense							(1,226		)	(12,107		)
	(41,706		)	(29,218		)	15,354			(41,706		)
Net Income	$	693,257		$	228,787		$	752,842		$	693,257
Earnings per Share:
Basic	$	3.23		$	1.04		$	3.51		$	3.23
Diluted	$	3.21		$	1.03		$	3.49		$	3.21
Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding:
Basic	214,819			219,963			214,694			214,819
Diluted	215,667			221,137			215,824			215,667
Comprehensive Income
Net Income	$	693,257		$	228,787		$	752,842		$	693,257
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustments	4,043			(4,191		)	5,889			4,043
Change in defined benefit plans	(5,051		)	3,318			(1,990		)	(5,051		)
Gain (loss) on cash flow derivative hedges	95,536			(222,492		)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)	94,528			(223,365		)
Gain on cash flow derivative hedges							230,245			95,536
Total other comprehensive income							234,144			94,528
Comprehensive Income	$	787,785		$	5,422		$	986,986		$	787,785

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(unaudited; in thousands, except per share data)


	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016			2015			2017			2016
Passenger ticket revenues	$	4,794,653		$	4,688,189		$	4,892,760		$	4,794,653
Onboard and other revenues	1,792,145			1,708,832			1,880,618			1,792,145
Total revenues	6,586,798			6,397,021			6,773,378			6,586,798
Cruise operating expenses:
Commissions, transportation and other	1,060,391			1,093,409			1,060,176			1,060,391
Onboard and other	399,739			438,558			395,472			399,739
Payroll and related	671,955			647,788			636,861			671,955
Food	371,759			361,317			369,198			371,759
Fuel	531,283			607,689			508,914			531,283
Other operating	857,161			777,291			780,257			857,161
Total cruise operating expenses	3,892,288			3,926,052			3,750,878			3,892,288
Marketing, selling and administrative expenses	845,808			817,040			874,957			852,435
Depreciation and amortization expenses	661,712			617,678			710,836			661,712
Impairment of Pullmantur related assets	—			411,267
Restructuring charges	6,627			—
Operating Income	1,180,363			624,984			1,436,707			1,180,363
Other income (expense):
Interest income	14,875			8,244			16,756			14,875
Interest expense, net of interest capitalized	(226,803		)	(213,598		)	(230,182		)	(226,803		)
Other income (including a $21.7 million loss related to the 2016 elimination of the Pullmantur reporting lag and including in 2015 a net deferred tax benefit of $12.0 million related to the Pullmantur impairment)	53,867			39,354
Equity investment income							120,359			94,832
Other expense (including a $21.7 million loss related to the first quarter 2016 elimination of the Pullmantur reporting lag)							(6,546		)	(40,965		)
	(158,061		)	(166,000		)	(99,613		)	(158,061		)
Net Income	$	1,022,302		$	458,984		$	1,337,094		$	1,022,302
Earnings per Share:
Basic	$	4.74		$	2.09		$	6.22		$	4.74
Diluted	$	4.72		$	2.08		$	6.19		$	4.72
Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding:
Basic	215,663			219,835			214,882			215,663
Diluted	216,575			220,979			215,905			216,575
Comprehensive Income
Net Income	$	1,022,302		$	458,984		$	1,337,094		$	1,022,302
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustments	8,423			(23,994		)	14,210			8,423
Change in defined benefit plans	(12,148		)	5,567			(6,280		)	(12,148		)
Gain (loss) on cash flow derivative hedges	254,624			(280,968		)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)	250,899			(299,395		)
Gain on cash flow derivative hedges							381,660			254,624
Total other comprehensive income							389,590			250,899
Comprehensive Income	$	1,273,201		$	159,589		$	1,726,684		$	1,273,201

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share data)

As of
September 30, December 31,
2016 2015
(unaudited)
Assets

Current assets

Cash and cash equivalents $ 178,428
$ 121,565
Trade and other receivables, net 273,422
238,972
Inventories 118,849
121,332
Prepaid expenses and other assets 231,442
220,579
Derivative financial instruments 928
134,574
Total current assets 803,069
837,022
Property and equipment, net 20,230,803
18,777,778
Goodwill 288,461
286,764
Other assets 1,127,929
880,479
$ 22,450,262
$ 20,782,043
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

Current liabilities
Current portion of long-term debt $ 1,298,002
$ 899,542
Accounts payable 259,027
302,072
Accrued interest 95,112
38,325
Accrued expenses and other liabilities 678,874
658,601
Derivative financial instruments 201,877
651,866
Customer deposits 1,967,678
1,742,286
Total current liabilities 4,500,570
4,292,692
Long-term debt 8,419,850
7,627,701
Other long-term liabilities 739,693
798,611
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7)

Shareholders’ equity

Preferred stock ($0.01 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized; none outstanding) —
—
Common stock ($0.01 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized; 234,589,237 and 233,905,166 shares issued, September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively) 2,346
2,339
Paid-in capital 3,316,385
3,297,619
Retained earnings 7,702,260
6,944,862
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (1,077,534 ) (1,328,433 )
Treasury stock (20,019,237 and 15,911,971 common shares at cost, September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively) (1,153,308 ) (853,348 )
Total shareholders’ equity 8,790,149
8,063,039
$ 22,450,262
$ 20,782,043



	As of
	September 30,			December 31,
	2017			2016
	(unaudited)
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	139,950		$	132,603
Trade and other receivables, net	285,332			291,899
Inventories	119,949			114,087
Prepaid expenses and other assets	200,125			209,716
Derivative financial instruments	52,796			—
Total current assets	798,152			748,305
Property and equipment, net	19,688,872			20,161,427
Goodwill	288,517			288,386
Other assets	1,323,773			1,112,206
	$	22,099,314		$	22,310,324
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Current liabilities
Current portion of long-term debt	$	1,515,708		$	1,285,735
Accounts payable	384,536			305,313
Accrued interest	92,914			46,166
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	748,442			692,322
Derivative financial instruments	89,333			146,592
Customer deposits	2,226,179			1,965,473
Total current liabilities	5,057,112			4,441,601
Long-term debt	6,076,499			8,101,701
Other long-term liabilities	530,215			645,610
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7)
Shareholders’ equity
Preferred stock ($0.01 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized; none outstanding)	—			—
Common stock ($0.01 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized; 235,134,180 and 234,613,486 shares issued, September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively)	2,351			2,346
Paid-in capital	3,375,969			3,328,517
Retained earnings	8,862,369			7,860,341
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(526,894		)	(916,484		)
Treasury stock (21,059,191 and 20,019,237 common shares at cost, September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively)	(1,278,307		)	(1,153,308		)
Total shareholders’ equity	10,435,488			9,121,412
	$	22,099,314		$	22,310,324

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited; in thousands)


	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016			2015			2017			2016
Operating Activities
Net income	$	1,022,302		$	458,984		$	1,337,094		$	1,022,302
Adjustments:
Depreciation and amortization	661,712			617,678			710,836			661,712
Impairment of Pullmantur related assets	—			411,267
Net deferred income tax expense (benefit)	1,601			(13,466		)
Loss on derivative instruments not designated as hedges	6,353			49,607
Net deferred income tax expense							516			1,601
(Gain) loss on derivative instruments not designated as hedges							(56,836		)	6,353
Share-based compensation expense							52,469			22,041
Equity investment income							(120,359		)	(94,832		)
Amortization of debt issuance costs							37,562			39,425
Gain on sale of property and equipment							(30,902		)	—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Decrease in trade and other receivables, net	9,823			24,130			16,245			9,823
Increase in inventories	(6,379		)	(8,377		)	(6,131		)	(6,379		)
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses and other assets	2,484			(30,649		)	10,211			(8,794		)
Decrease in accounts payable	(17,313		)	(22,915		)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable							77,436			(17,313		)
Increase in accrued interest	56,787			34,207			46,748			56,787
Increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities	23,216			11,558			12,870			17,929
Increase in customer deposits	197,277			65,511			256,855			197,277
Dividends received from unconsolidated affiliates	71,370			5,327			107,267			71,370
Other, net	(28,281		)	5,074			2,720			21,650
Net cash provided by operating activities	2,000,952			1,607,936			2,454,601			2,000,952
Investing Activities
Purchases of property and equipment	(2,313,831		)	(1,360,637		)	(387,335		)	(2,313,831		)
Cash paid on settlement of derivative financial instruments	(172,878		)	(158,890		)
Cash received (paid) on settlement of derivative financial instruments							57,004			(172,878		)
Investments in and loans to unconsolidated affiliates	(8,611		)	(54,250		)	—			(8,611		)
Cash received on loans to unconsolidated affiliates	22,470			122,710			31,633			22,470
Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment							230,000			—
Other, net ⁽¹⁾	(44,709		)	(18,642		)	(9,313		)	(44,709		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(2,517,559		)	(1,469,709		)	(78,011		)	(2,517,559		)
Financing Activities
Debt proceeds	6,038,560			2,962,501			3,682,000			6,038,560
Debt issuance costs	(83,793		)	(57,146		)	(25,987		)	(83,793		)
Repayments of debt	(4,818,262		)	(2,887,237		)	(5,598,198		)	(4,818,262		)
Purchases of treasury stock	(299,959		)	—			(124,999		)	(299,959		)
Dividends paid	(243,557		)	(197,718		)	(309,162		)	(243,557		)
Proceeds from exercise of common stock options	1,782			6,902			2,499			1,782
Other, net	2,179			1,778			4,137			2,179
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	596,950			(170,920		)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities							(2,369,710		)	596,950
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	(23,480		)	(9,129		)	467			(23,480		)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	56,863			(41,822		)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents							7,347			56,863
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	121,565			189,241			132,603			121,565
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	178,428		$	147,419		$	139,950		$	178,428
Supplemental Disclosure
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest, net of amount capitalized	$	140,335		$	151,661		$	147,789		$	140,335
Non-cash Investing Activities
Notes receivable issued upon sale of property and equipment	$	213,042		$	—		$	—		$	213,042

⁽¹⁾Amount includes $26.0 million in 2016 related to cash included in the divestiture of ~~RCHE.~~our 51% interest in Pullmantur Holdings.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

As used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the terms “Royal Caribbean,” the “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” refer to Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. and, depending on the context, Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.’s consolidated subsidiaries and/or affiliates. The terms “Royal Caribbean International,” “Celebrity ~~Cruises,”~~Cruises” and “Azamara Club ~~Cruises,” “TUI Cruises,” “Pullmantur,” and “CDF Croisières de France”~~Cruises” refer to our wholly-owned global cruise brands. Throughout this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we also refer to regional brands in which we hold an ownership interest, including “TUI Cruises,” “Pullmantur” and “SkySea Cruises.” However, because ~~TUI Cruises is an~~these regional brands are unconsolidated ~~investment,~~investments, our operating results and other disclosures herein do not include TUI Cruises unless otherwise specified. Additionally, prior to August 2016, both Pullmantur and CDF Croisières de France ("CDF") were wholly owned by us. However, in July 2016, we sold 51% of our interest in Pullmantur and CDF, therefore, for the period subsequent to the sale, our operating results and other disclosures herein do not include Pullmantur and CDFthese brands unless otherwise specified. In accordance with cruise vacation industry practice, the term “berths” is determined based on double occupancy per cabin even though many cabins can accommodate three or more passengers. This ~~report~~Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, including the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included therein.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q also includes trademarks, trade names and service marks of other companies. Use or display by us of other parties’ trademarks, trade names or service marks is not intended to and does not imply a relationship with, or endorsement or sponsorship of us by, these other parties other than as described herein.

Note 1. General

Description of Business

We are a global cruise company. As of September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, we own and operate three global cruise brands: Royal Caribbean International, Celebrity Cruises and Azamara Club ~~Cruises.~~Cruises (collectively, our "Global Brands"). We also own a 50% joint venture interest in the German brand TUI Cruises, a 49% interest in the Spanish brand Pullmantur and have a minority ~~interests~~interest in ~~other smaller regional brands.~~the Chinese brand SkySea Cruises (collectively, our "Partner Brands"). We account for our investments in our Partner Brands under the equity method of accounting.

Prior to August 2016, ~~Royal Caribbean~~Pullmantur Holdings ~~de Espana~~S.L. ("~~RCHE"~~Pullmantur Holdings"), the parent company of the Pullmantur ~~and CDF brands,~~brand (formerly known as Royal Caribbean Holdings de España S.L.), was wholly owned by us. Effective July 31, 2016, we sold 51% of our interest in ~~RCHE.~~Pullmantur Holdings. We retain a 49% interest in ~~RCHE~~Pullmantur Holdings as well as full ownership of the four vessels currently operated by the ~~brands, which are~~Pullmantur brand under bareboat ~~chartered to RCHE.~~charter arrangements. We account for the bareboat charters of the vessels to ~~RCHE~~Pullmantur Holdings as operating leases. We also provide certain ship management services and other related services to RCHE. As a result of the sale of a majority interest in RCHE, we recognized an immaterial gain. In addition, we also continue to retain full ownership of the aircraft, which were not impacted by this sale transaction. Effective August 2016, we no longer consolidate RCHE in our consolidated financial statements and our investment in the company is accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Refer to Note 5. ~~Other Assets~~ ~~for further information on our retained interest in RCHE.~~

The sale did not represent a strategic shift that will have a major effect on our operations and financial results, as we continue to provide similar itineraries to and source passengers from the markets served by the Pullmantur and CDF businesses. Therefore, the sale of RCHE did not meet the criteria for discontinued operations reporting. Due to the change in the nature of the cash flows to be generated by the vessels operated by RCHE, we also reviewed the vessels for impairment. We determined that the undiscounted future cash flows of the vessels exceeded their carrying value; therefore, no impairment was required.Holdings.

Basis for Preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements

The unaudited consolidated financial statements are presented pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In our opinion, these statements include all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the results of the interim periods reported herein. Adjustments consist only of normal recurring items, except for any discussed in the notes below. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). have been condensed or omitted as permitted by such rules and regulations. Estimates are required for the preparation of financial statements in accordance with ~~these principles. Actual~~GAAP and actual results could differ from these estimates. Refer to Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 for a discussion of our significant accounting policies.

All significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. We consolidate entities over which we have control, usually evidenced by a direct ownership interest of greater than 50%, and variable interest entities where we are determined to be the primary beneficiary. Refer to Note 5. Other Assets for further information regarding our variable interest entities. For affiliates we do not control but over which we have significant influence on financial and operating policies, usually evidenced by a direct ownership interest from 20% to 50%, the investment is accounted for using the equity method.

Prior to January 1, 2016, we consolidated the operating results of ~~RCHE~~Pullmantur Holdings on a two-month reporting lag to allow for more timely preparation of our consolidated financial statements. Effective January 1, 2016, we eliminated the two-month reporting lag

~~Table of Contents~~

to reflect ~~RCHE's~~Pullmantur Holding's financial position, results of operations and cash flows concurrently and consistently with the fiscal calendar of the Company ~~("elimination~~(the "elimination of the Pullmantur reporting lag"). The elimination of the Pullmantur reporting lag represented a change in accounting principle which we believed to be preferable because it provided more current

Table of Contents

information to the users of our financial statements. A change in accounting principle requires retrospective application, if material. The impact of the elimination of the Pullmantur reporting lag was immaterial to prior periods and ~~is expected to be~~was immaterial for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2016. As a result, we have accounted for this change in accounting principle in our consolidated results for the first ~~nine months~~quarter of 2016. Accordingly, the results of ~~RCHE~~Pullmantur Holdings for November and December 2015 are included in our statement of comprehensive income (loss) for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The effect of this change was a decrease to net income of $21.7 million, which has been reported within Other ~~income~~expense in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Revenue from Contracts with Customers

In May 2014, amended GAAP guidance was issued to clarify the principles used to recognize revenue for all entities. The guidance also requires more detailed disclosures and provides additional guidance for transactions that were not comprehensively addressed in the prior accounting guidance. This guidance must be applied using one of two retrospective application methods and will be effective for our annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods therein. ~~Early~~

We have made significant progress toward completing our evaluation of potential changes to our core revenues using the five-step model supported by the new revenue standard. Currently, we are in the process of finalizing our analysis and quantifying the effects of adoption, ~~is permitted~~if any, on how we account for our ~~annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods therein.~~customer loyalty programs and promotional offerings, as the new standard has changed the method of accounting for loyalty points from a cost-based model to a revenue deferral model using a relative stand-alone selling price method. We ~~are currently evaluating~~expect to complete this analysis and conclude our evaluation on the impact ~~if any,~~ of adopting this new standard on our consolidated financial statements during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017. Based on our assessment to date, we do not expect the adoption of the new standard to materially change the timing of recognition of our core revenues, but we do anticipate enhancing our disclosures with respect to our revenue recognition ~~guidance to our consolidated financial statements and~~policies in compliance with the new standard.

Upon adoption, we intend to elect the modified retrospective ~~method to all contracts on the date of initial application, January 1, 2018.~~method. This will involve applying the guidance retrospectively only to the most current period presented in the consolidated financial statements and recognizing the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance as an adjustment to the January 1, 2018 opening balance of retained ~~earnings at the date of initial application.~~ earnings.

In August 2014, GAAP guidance was issued requiring management to evaluate, at each annual and interim reporting period, whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued and provide related disclosures. This guidance will be effective for our annual reporting period ending after December 15, 2016 and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have an impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In July 2015, amended GAAP guidance was issued to simplify the measurement of inventory for all entities. The amendments apply to all inventory that is measured using first-in, first-out or average cost. The guidance requires an entity to measure inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. The guidance must be applied prospectively and will be effective for our interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In November 2015, amended GAAP guidance was issued to simplify the presentation of deferred income taxes. The amendments require that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position and eliminates the classification between current and noncurrent amounts. The guidance will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those fiscal years. An entity can elect to adopt the amendments either prospectively or retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, amended GAAP guidance was issued to address certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments. The amendments primarily impact the accounting for certain equity investments, the accounting for financial liabilities subject to the fair value option and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. The guidance will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for financial statements of fiscal years and interim periods that have not yet been issued or that have not yet been made available for issuance as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.Leases

In February 2016, amended GAAP guidance was issued to increase the transparency and comparability of lease accounting among organizations. For leases with a term greater than 12 months, the amendments require the lease rights and obligations arising from the leasing arrangements, including operating leases, to be recognized as assets and liabilities on the balance sheet. The amendments also expand the required disclosures surrounding leasing arrangements. The guidance must be applied using a

~~Table of Contents~~

retrospective application method and will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this newly issued guidance to our consolidated financial statements.

~~In March 2016, amended GAAP guidance was issued addressing the effect~~Classification of derivative contract novations on existing hedge accounting relationships. The amendments clarify that a change in the counterparty to a derivative instrument that has been designated as a hedging instrument does not, inCertain Cash Receipts and of itself, require dedesignation of that hedging relationship provided that all other hedge accounting criteria continue to be met. The guidance must be applied using a prospective or modified retrospective application method and will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, amended GAAP guidance was issued addressing contingent put and call options in debt instruments. The amendments clarify the requirements for assessing whether contingent call and put options that can accelerate the payment of principal on debt instruments are clearly and closely related to their debt hosts, or whether the embedded call and put options should be bifurcated from the related debt instrument and accounted for separately as a derivative. The guidance must be applied using a modified retrospective approach and will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have an impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, amended GAAP guidance was issued to simplify the transition to the equity method of accounting. The amendments eliminate the requirement that when an investment qualifies for use of the equity method as a result of an increase in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence, an investor must adjust the investment, results of operations and retained earnings retroactively on a step-by step basis as if the equity method had been in effect during all previous periods that the investment had been held. The guidance must be applied prospectively and will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements, but could have an impact on our accounting for equity method investments in the future.

In March 2016, amended GAAP guidance was issued to simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. The guidance will be effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, amended GAAP guidance was issued to address expected credit losses on financial instruments and other commitments. The amendment requires financial assets and net investment leases that are currently measured at amortized cost basis be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. The guidance must be applied using the modified-retrospective approach and will be effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019 and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted beginning after December 15, 2018. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.Cash Payments

In August 2016, amended GAAP guidance was issued to clarify how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The amendments are aimed at reducing the existing diversity in practice. The guidance should be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented and will be effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. We intend to adopt the guidance on the date of initial application, January 1, 2018. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory

In October 2016, amended GAAP guidance was issued that requires the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset, other than inventory, to be recognized at the time that the transfer occurs, rather than when the asset is sold to an outside party. The new guidance is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an annual period for which financial statements have not been issued. The guidance is required to be adopted retrospectively by recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of

Table of Contents

the adoption period. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

Service Concession Arrangements

In May 2017, amended GAAP guidance was issued to clarify who should be viewed as the customer under service concession arrangements. A service concession arrangement is an arrangement under which a public sector entity (“grantor”), such as a Port Authority, grants a private entity (“operator”), such as the Company, the right to operate the grantor's infrastructure for a specified period of time. The amended guidance will require the Company to evaluate the relationship with the grantor and identify the multiple performance obligations that may exist under these concession arrangements, including consideration of construction services that may be performed, operational services, and any other maintenance or ancillary services performed under the service concession. In addition, the amended guidance will require that all revenue streams identified under such arrangements be evaluated with the grantor as the customer, irrespective of whether some of the revenues are paid by third-party users of the infrastructure under concession. The clarification will enable a more consistent application of the new Revenue from Contracts with Customers guidance, which along with this clarification guidance, will be effective for our annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods therein. This guidance must be applied using one of two retrospective application methods. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this newly issued guidance to our consolidated financial statements.

Derivatives and Hedging

In August 2017, amended GAAP guidance was issued to simplify and improve the financial reporting of hedging relationships to better portray the economic results of an entity's risk management activities in its financial statements. In addition to changes in designation and measurement for qualifying hedge relationships, the guidance requires an entity to report the earnings effect of the hedging instrument in the same income statement line item in which the earnings effect of the hedged item is reported. As a result, hedge ineffectiveness will no longer be separately measured or reported. This guidance will be effective for our annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted in any interim period after issuance of this guidance. All transition requirements and elections should be applied to hedging relationships existing on the date of adoption. The effect of the adoption should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this newly issued guidance to our consolidated financial statements.

Other

Revenues and expenses include port costs that vary with guest head counts. The amounts of such port costs included in Passenger ticket revenues on a gross basis were ~~$158.7~~$135.9 million and ~~$156.8~~$158.7 million for the third quarters of ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015,~~2016, respectively, and ~~$443.1~~$413.7 million and ~~$425.6~~$443.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015,~~2016, respectively.

Reclassifications

~~On January 1,~~For the third quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2016, ~~we adopted Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 835, Presentation~~restructuring charges of ~~Debt Issuance Costs, using the retrospective approach. Due to the adoption of ASC 835, $139.8~~$1.9 million ~~of debt issuance costs~~and $6.6 million, respectively, have been reclassified into Marketing, selling and administrative expensesin the

~~Table~~ consolidated statements of ~~Contents~~

~~consolidated balance sheet, as of December 31, 2015, from~~ ~~Other assets~~ ~~to either~~ ~~Current portion of long-term debt~~ or ~~Long-term debt~~ comprehensive income (loss) in order to conform to the current year presentation.

For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015, $5.3~~2016, share-based compensation expense of $22.0 million, ~~has~~equity investment income of $94.8 million and amortization of debt issuance costs of $22.9 million, have been reclassified in the consolidated statements of cash flows from Other, netto ~~Dividends received from unconsolidated affiliates~~Share-based compensation expense, Equity investment income and Amortization of debt issuance costs, respectively, within Net cash provided by operating activities in order to conform to the current year presentation.

Additionally, for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, amortization of debt issuance costs of $11.3 million and $5.3 million, have been reclassified from Decrease(increase) in prepaid expenses and other assets and from Increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities, respectively, in the consolidated statements of cash flows to Amortization of debt issuance costs, within Net cash provided by operating activities in order to conform to the current year presentation.

Table of Contents

Note 3. Earnings Per Share

A reconciliation between basic and diluted earnings per share is as follows (in thousands, except per share data):


	Quarter Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,				Quarter Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015		2017		2016		2017		2016
Net income for basic and diluted earnings per share	$	693,257	$	228,787	$	1,022,302	$	458,984	$	752,842	$	693,257	$	1,337,094	$	1,022,302
Weighted-average common shares outstanding	214,819		219,963		215,663		219,835		214,694		214,819		214,882		215,663
Dilutive effect of stock options, performance share awards and restricted stock awards	848		1,174		912		1,144		1,130		848		1,023		912
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding	215,667		221,137		216,575		220,979		215,824		215,667		215,905		216,575
Basic earnings per share	$	3.23	$	1.04	$	4.74	$	2.09	$	3.51	$	3.23	$	6.22	$	4.74
Diluted earnings per share	$	3.21	$	1.03	$	4.72	$	2.08	$	3.49	$	3.21	$	6.19	$	4.72

There were no antidilutive shares for the quarters and nine month periods ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and September 30, ~~2015.~~2016.

~~Table of Contents~~

Note 4. Property and Equipment

In March 2017, we sold Legend of the Seas to an affiliate of TUI AG, our joint venture partner in TUI Cruises. The sale resulted in a gain of $30.9 million and is reported within Other operating within Cruise operating expenses in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.

In April 2016, we ~~completed the previously announced sale of~~sold Splendour of the Seas to TUI Cruises. Concurrent with the acquisition, TUI Cruises leased the ship to ~~Thomson Cruises, an affiliate of~~the same TUI AG ~~our joint venture partner, who will operate~~affiliate mentioned above, which now operates the ship. The gain recognized did not have a material effect to our consolidated financial ~~statements.~~

~~In June 2016, we entered into an agreement to sell a ship to Thomson Cruises. The sale is scheduled to be completed~~statements and was also reported in ~~March 2017~~ Other operating within Cruise operating expenses in ~~order to retain~~our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) for the future revenues to be generated for sailings through that date. We expect to recognize a gain on the sale, which we do not expect will have a material effect to our annual consolidated financial statements.nine months ended September 30, 2016.

Note 5. Other Assets

A Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”) is an entity in which the equity investors have not provided enough equity to finance the entity’s activities or the equity investors: (1) cannot directly or indirectly make decisions about the entity’s activities through their voting rights or similar rights; (2) do not have the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity; (3) do not have the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity; or (4) have voting rights that are not proportionate to their economic interests and the entity’s activities involve or are conducted on behalf of an investor with a disproportionately small voting interest.

We have determined that TUI Cruises GmbH, our 50%-owned joint venture, which operates the brand TUI Cruises, is a VIE. As of September 30, 2017, the net book value of our investment in TUI Cruises was approximately $582.5 million, primarily consisting of $379.3 million in equity and a loan of €170.4 million, or approximately $201.5 million based on the exchange rate at September 30, 2017. As of December 31, 2016, the net book value of our investment in TUI Cruises was approximately ~~$513.6~~$517.0 million, primarily consisting of ~~$304.3~~$323.5 million in equity and a loan of ~~$209.3 million.~~€182.3 million, or approximately $192.4 million based on the exchange rate at December 31, 2016. The loan, which was made in connection with the sale of Splendour of the Seas in April 2016, accrues interest at a rate of 6.25% per annum and is payable over ~~a 10-year term.~~10 years. This loan is 50% guaranteed by TUI AG, our joint venture partner in TUI Cruises, and is secured by a first priority mortgage on the ship. Refer to Note 4. Property and Equipment for further information. ~~As of December 31, 2015, the net book value of our investment in TUI Cruises was approximately $293.8 million, consisting of equity.~~ The majority of these amounts were included within Other assets in our consolidated balance sheets.

In addition, we and TUI AG have each guaranteed the repayment by TUI Cruises of 50% of a bank loan. As of September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the outstanding principal amount of the loan was ~~€121.6~~€100.4 million, or approximately ~~$136.6~~$118.7 million based on the exchange rate at September 30, ~~2016.~~2017. While this loan matures in May 2022, the lenders have agreed to release each shareholder's guarantee inif certain conditions are met by April 2018. The loan amortizes quarterly and is secured by first mortgages on the Mein Schiff 1 and Mein Schiff 2 vessels. Based on current facts and circumstances, we do not believe potential obligations under our guarantee of this bank loan are probable.

Our investment amount, outstanding term loan and the potential obligations under the bank loan guarantee are substantially our maximum exposure to loss in connection with our investment in TUI Cruises. We have determined that we are not the primary beneficiary of TUI Cruises. We believe that the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact TUI Cruises’ economic performance are shared between ourselves and TUI AG. All the significant operating and financial decisions of TUI Cruises require

Table of Contents

the consent of both parties, which we believe creates shared power over TUI Cruises. Accordingly, we do not consolidate this entity and account for this investment under the equity method of accounting.

~~As of September 30, 2016,~~ TUI Cruises has ~~three~~two newbuild ships on order scheduled to be delivered in each of ~~2017,~~ 2018 and 2019. TUI Cruises has in place agreements for the secured financing of each of the ships on order for up to 80% of the contract price. The remaining portion of the contract price of the ships is expected to be funded through an existing €150.0 million bank facility and TUI Cruises’ cash flows from operations. The various ship construction and financing agreements include certain restrictions on each of our and TUI AG’s ability to reduce our current ownership interest in TUI Cruises below 37.55% through 2021.

We have determined that ~~RCHE,~~Pullmantur Holdings, in which we have a 49% noncontrolling interest, is a VIE for which we are not the primary beneficiary, as we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance. Accordingly, ~~subsequent to~~following the sale of our 51% interest in ~~RCHE~~Pullmantur Holdings to Springwater Capital LLC ("Springwater"), we do not consolidate this entity and we account for this investment under the equity method of accounting. As of September 30, ~~2016, the net book value of~~2017, our ~~investment~~maximum exposure to loss in ~~RCHE~~Pullmantur Holdings was approximately ~~$25.0~~$50.9 million consisting of ~~reimbursement commitments from several RCHE subsidiaries~~loans and other receivables. As of December 31, 2016, our maximum exposure to ~~RCL for fuel hedge costs related to~~loss in Pullmantur Holdings was approximately $40.3 million consisting of loans and ~~CDF through the closing date and as a condition of the sale. The amount is payable through 2019 and is 51% guaranteed by Springwater. This amount was~~other receivables. These amounts were included within Trade and ~~Other Receivables~~other receivables, net and Other assetsin our consolidated balance ~~sheets and represents our maximum exposure to loss related to our investment in RCHE.~~sheets.

In conjunction with the sale of our 51% interest in Pullmantur Holdings, we ~~provided~~agreed to provide a non-revolving working capital facility to ~~an RCHE~~a Pullmantur Holdings subsidiary in the amount of up to €15.0 million or approximately ~~$16.9~~$17.7 million based on the exchange rate at September 30, ~~2016.~~2017. Proceeds of the facility,

~~Table of Contents~~

which may be drawn through July 2018, will bear interest at the rate of 6.5% per annum and are payable through 2022. Springwater has guaranteed repayment of 51% of the ~~oustanding~~outstanding amounts under the facility. As of September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, no amounts had been drawn on this facility. ~~See Note 1.~~ ~~General~~ ~~for further discussion on the sales transaction.~~

We have determined that Grand Bahama Shipyard Ltd. (“Grand Bahama”), a ship repair and maintenance facility in which we have a 40% noncontrolling interest, is a VIE. This facility serves cruise and cargo ships, oil and gas tankers and offshore units. We utilize this facility, among other ship repair facilities, for our regularly scheduled drydocks and certain emergency repairs as may be required. During the quarter and nine months ended September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, we made payments of ~~$2.6~~$1.9 million and ~~$36.0~~$7.5 million, respectively, to Grand Bahama for ship repair and maintenance services. We have determined that we are not the primary beneficiary of this facility as we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the facility’s economic performance. Accordingly, we do not consolidate this entity and we account for this investment under the equity method of accounting. As of September 30, 2017, the net book value of our investment in Grand Bahama was approximately $50.4 million, consisting of $30.8 million in equity and a loan of $19.6 million. As of December 31, 2016, the net book value of our investment in Grand Bahama was approximately ~~$45.7~~$47.0 million, consisting of ~~$21.9~~$23.2 million in equity and a loan of $23.8 ~~million. As of December 31, 2015, the net book value of our investment in Grand Bahama was approximately $51.2 million, consisting of $12.6 million in equity and a loan of $38.6~~ million. These amounts represent our maximum exposure to loss related to our investment in Grand Bahama. Our debt agreement with Grand Bahama was amended during the quarter ended March 31, 2016 to extend the maturity by 10 years and increase the applicable interest rate to the lower of (i) LIBOR plus 3.50% and (ii) 5.5%. Interest payable on the loan is due on a semi-annual basis. We continue to classify the loan, as modified, as non-accrual status. The loan balance is included within Other assets in our consolidated balance sheets. ~~During the quarter ended September 30, 2016, no principal payments were made. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016 we received principal payments of approximately $14.8 million.~~ We monitor credit risk associated with the loan through our participation on Grand Bahama’s board of directors along with our review of Grand Bahama’s financial statements and projected cash flows. Based on this review, we believe the risk of loss associated with the outstanding loan is not probable as of September 30, ~~2016.~~2017.

We have determined that Skysea Holding International Ltd. ("Skysea Holding"), in which we have a ~~35%~~36% noncontrolling interest, is a ~~VIE for~~VIE. During the second quarter of 2017, we made an equity contribution of $7.1 million which increased our equity interest from 35% to 36%. The contribution was made pursuant to a funding arrangement in which the entity's three largest investors agreed to contribute a total of $30.0 million in proportion to their equity interest in a series of installments. We have determined that we are not the primary beneficiary of Skysea Holding as we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance. Accordingly, we do not consolidate this entity and we account for this investment under the equity method of accounting. In December 2014, we and Ctrip.com International Ltd, which also owns ~~35%~~36% of Skysea Holding, each provided a debt facility to a wholly owned subsidiary of Skysea Holding in the amount of $80.0 million. Interest under these facilities, which mature in January 2030, ~~initially~~currently accrues at a rate of ~~3.0%~~6.5% per ~~annum with an increase of at least 0.5% every two years through maturity.~~annum. The facilities, which are pari passu to each other, are each 100% guaranteed by Skysea Holding and are secured by first priority mortgages on the ship, Golden Era. In September 2016, we and Ctrip.com International Ltd each provided an additional debt facility to Skysea Holding in the amount of up to $3.8 million. Interest under these facilities, which mature in December 2016, accrues at a rate of 3.0% per annum. As of September 30, 2017, the net book value of our investment in Skysea Holding and its subsidiaries was approximately $97.3 million, consisting of $6.5 million in equity and loans and other receivables of $90.8 million. As of December 31, 2016, the net book value of our investment in Skysea Holding and its subsidiaries was approximately ~~$95.5~~$98.0 million, consisting of ~~$11.2~~$9.2 million in equity and loans and other receivables of $84.3 million. As of December 31, 2015, the net book value of our investment in Skysea Holding and its subsidiaries was approximately $99.8 million, consisting of $17.3 million in equity and a loan of $82.4$88.8 million. The majority of these amounts were included within Other assets in our consolidated balance sheets and represent our maximum exposure to loss related to our investment in Skysea Holding.

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth information regarding our investments accounted for under the equity method of accounting, including the entities discussed above, (in thousands):

Quarter Ended September 30, 2016 Quarter Ended September 30, 2015 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
Share of equity income from investments ⁽¹⁾
$ 46,539
$ 38,359
$ 94,832
$ 62,183
Dividends received $ 47,491
$ 1,347
$ 71,370
$ 5,327

⁽¹⁾~~Our share of equity income from investments are reported within~~ ~~Other income~~ ~~in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) and~~ ~~Other, net~~ ~~within Operating Activitiesin our consolidated statements of cash flows.~~

~~Table of Contents~~



	Quarter Ended September 30, 2017		Quarter Ended September 30, 2016		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
Share of equity income from investments	$	85,120	$	46,539	$	120,359	$	94,832
Dividends received	$	49,865	$	47,491	$	107,267	$	71,370

We also provide ship management services to TUI Cruises GmbH, ~~RCHE~~Pullmantur Holdings and Skysea Holding. Additionally, we bareboat charter to Pullmantur Holdings the vessels currently operated by its brands, which were retained by ~~us.~~us following the sale of our 51% interest in Pullmantur Holdings. We recorded the following as it relates to these services in our operating results within our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) (in thousands):


	Quarter Ended September 30, 2016	Quarter Ended September 30, 2015	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015	Quarter Ended September 30, 2017		Quarter Ended September 30, 2016		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
Revenues	$9,300	$3,940	$17,888	$15,557	$	14,054	$	9,300	$	39,987	$	17,888
Expenses	$2,410	$2,606	$8,930	$12,149	$	3,770	$	2,410	$	11,503	$	8,930

Note 6. Long-Term Debt

In ~~February 2016,~~October 2017, we amended and restated our $1.2 billion unsecured ~~term loans for~~ ~~Oasis~~revolving credit facility due August 2018. The amendment reduced the applicable margin and extended the termination date to October 2022. The applicable margin and facility fee vary with our debt rating and are currently 1.175% and 0.20%, respectively. We have the ability to increase the capacity of the ~~Seas~~amended facility by an additional $500 million, subject to the receipt of additional or increased lender commitments, and ~~Allure of~~to extend the ~~Seas~~termination date by up to reduce the margins on those facilities and incorporate certain covenant improvements included in our more recent credit facilities. The interest rate on both the $420.0 million floating rate tranche of the ~~Oasis of the Seas~~ ~~term loan and the $1.1 billion~~ ~~Allure of the Seas~~ ~~term loan was reduced from LIBOR plus 1.85%~~two years, subject to ~~LIBOR plus 1.65%.~~lender consent. These amendments did not result in the extinguishment of debt.

In February 2016, we agreed with the lenders on our €365.0 million unsecured term loan due 2017 to convert €247.5 million, or $273.2 million, of the outstanding principal balance from Euro to US dollars. Interest on the new US dollar tranche accrues at a floating rate based on LIBOR plus the applicable margin. The balance of the facility of €117.5 million will remain outstanding in Euro and will continue to accrue interest at a floating rate based on EURIBOR, subject to a 0% floor, plus the applicable margin. The applicable margin varies with our debt rating and was 1.75% as of September 30, 2016. The amendment did not result in the extinguishment of debt.

~~In April 2016, we took delivery of~~ ~~Ovation of the Seas~~. To finance the purchase, we borrowed $841.8 million under a previously committed unsecured term loan which is 95% guaranteed by Euler Hermes Deutschland AG ("Hermes"), the official export credit agency of Germany. The loan amortizes semi-annually over 12 years and bears interest at LIBOR plus a margin of 1.00%, totaling 1.91% as of September 30, 2016. During 2015, we entered into forward-starting interest rate swap agreements which effectively converted $830.0 million of the loan from the floating rate available to us per the credit agreement to a fixed rate, including the applicable margin, of 3.16% effective from April 2016 through the maturity of the loan. See Note 10. ~~Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments~~ ~~for further information regarding these agreements.~~

In April 2016, we entered into and drew in full on a credit agreement which provides an unsecured term loan in the amount of $200 million. The loan is due and payable at maturity in April 2017. Interest on the loan accrues at a floating rate based on LIBOR plus a margin of 1.30%, totaling 1.82% as of September 30, 2016. The proceeds from this loan were used to repay amounts outstanding under our unsecured revolving credit facilities.

~~In May 2016, we took delivery of~~ ~~Harmony of the Seas~~. To finance the purchase, we borrowed an unsecured Euro-denominated term loan in the amount of €700.7 million, or $787.2 million based on the exchange rate at September 30, 2016, and an unsecured US dollar-denominated term loan in the amount of $226.1 million under previously committed credit agreements. Both of the facilities are 100% guaranteed by Compagnie Francaise d’Assurance pour le Commerce Extérieur (“COFACE”), the official export credit agency of France. The Euro-denominated term loan amortizes semi-annually over 12 years and bears interest at EURIBOR, subject to a 0% floor, plus the applicable margin of 1.15%, totaling 1.15% as of September 30, 2016. The US dollar-denominated term loan amortizes semi-annually over 12 years and bears interest at a fixed rate of 2.53%. During 2015, we entered into forward-starting interest rate swap agreements which effectively converted €693.4 million, or $779.0 million based on the exchange rate at September 30, 2016, of the Euro-denominated term loan from the floating rate per the credit agreement to a fixed rate, including the applicable margin, of 2.26% effective from May 2016 through the maturity of the loan. See Note 10. ~~Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments~~ ~~for further information regarding these agreements.~~

Note 7. Commitments and Contingencies

Ship Purchase Obligations

Our future capital commitments consist primarily of new ship orders. As of September 30, ~~2016, the~~2017, we had two Quantum-class ships, two Oasis-class ships and two ships of a new generation of ships, known as "Project Icon," on order for our Royal Caribbean International brand with an aggregate ~~cost~~capacity of ~~our ships on firm order, not including the TUI Cruises'~~approximately 30,500 berths. Additionally, as of September 30, 2017, we have four Edge-class ships on order ~~and those subject~~for our Celebrity Cruises brand with an aggregate capacity of approximately 11,600 berths. The following provides further information on recent developments with respect to conditions to effectiveness, was approximately $5.3 billion, of which we had deposited $282.0 million as of such date. Approximately 56.1% of the aggregate cost was exposed to fluctuations in the Euro exchange rate at September 30, 2016. Refer to Note 10. ~~Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments~~ ~~for further information.~~our ship orders.

~~Table~~During the second quarter of ~~Contents~~

~~In June 2016,~~2017, we entered into agreements with Meyer Turku to build two "Project Icon" ships. Subsequently, in October 2017, we entered into credit agreements for the unsecured financing of ~~our~~these ships for up to 80% of each ship’s contract price. For each ship, the official Finnish export credit agency, Finnvera, plc, has agreed to guarantee to the lenders a substantial majority of the financing, with a smaller portion of the financing to be 95% guaranteed by Euler Hermes, the official German export credit agency. The maximum loan amount under each facility is not to exceed €1.4 billion, or approximately $1.7 billion, based on the exchange rate at September 30, 2017. Interest on approximately 75% of each loan will accrue at a fixed rate of 3.56% and 3.76% for the first ~~two "Project Edge"~~and the second Icon-class ships, respectively, and the balance will accrue interest at a floating rate ranging from LIBOR plus 1.10% to 1.15% and LIBOR plus 1.15% to 1.20% for the first and the second Icon-class ships, respectively. Each loan will amortize semi-annually and will mature 12 years following delivery of each ship. The first and second Icon-class ships will each have a capacity of approximately 5,650 berths and are expected to enter service in the second quarters of 2022 and 2024, respectively.

In July 2017, we entered into credit agreements for the unsecured financing of the third and fourth Edge-class ships and the fifth Oasis-class ship for up to 80% of each ship’s contract price through facilities to be guaranteed 100% by ~~COFACE. The ships are expected to enter service in~~Bpifrance Assurance Export, the ~~fourth quarter~~official export credit agency of ~~2018 and the first half of 2020, respectively.~~France. Under these financing arrangements, we have the right, but not the obligation, to satisfy the obligations to be incurred upon delivery and acceptance of each ~~vessel~~ship under the shipbuilding contract by assuming, at delivery and acceptance, the debt indirectly incurred by the shipbuilder during the construction of each ship. The maximum loan amount under each facility is not to exceed €684.2 million in the UScase of the third Edge-class ship and the United States dollar equivalent of ~~€622.6~~€714.6 million and ~~€652.6 million,~~€1.1 billion in the case of the fourth Edge-class ship and fifth Oasis-class ship, or approximately ~~$699.4~~$844.7 million and ~~$733.1 million,~~$1.3 billion, respectively, based on the exchange rate at September 30, ~~2016, for the first "Project Edge" ship delivery and the second "Project Edge" ship delivery, respectively.~~2017. The loans will amortize semi-annually and will mature 12 years following delivery of each ship. Interest on the loans will accrue at a fixed rate of ~~3.23%.~~1.28% for the third Edge-class ship and at a fixed rate of 3.18% for both, the fourth Edge-class ship and the fifth Oasis-class ship. The third

Table of Contents

~~In September 2016, we signed conditional agreements with STX France to build a fifth Oasis-class ship expected to be delivered in the second quarter of 2021, and a third~~ and fourth ~~"Project Edge" ship expected to be delivered in the fourth quarter of~~Edge-class ships, each of ~~2021 and 2022. These agreements are contingent upon completion~~which will have a capacity of ~~conditions precedent, including financing.~~

~~In October 2016, we signed a memorandum of understanding with Meyer Turku to build two ships of a new generation of ships for Royal Caribbean International, known as "Project Icon", which~~approximately 2,900 berths, are expected to enter service in the ~~second~~fourth quarters of 2021 and 2022, ~~and 2024,~~ respectively. ~~While the design is still being finalized, each~~The fifth Oasis-class ship will ~~likely accommodate~~have a capacity of approximately ~~5,000 guests. These orders are contingent upon completion~~5,450 berths and is expected to enter service in the second quarter of ~~conditions precedent, including documentation and financing.~~

~~Litigation~~2021.

In ~~April 2015,~~September 2017, we entered into an agreement to purchase a ship for our Azamara Club Cruises brand. The sale is expected to be completed with the ~~Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation issued Notices of Violation to Royal Caribbean International and Celebrity Cruises seeking monetary penalties for alleged violations~~delivery of the ~~Alaska Marine Visible Emission Standards that occurred over~~ship scheduled for March 2018.

As of September 30, 2017, the ~~past five years on certain~~aggregate cost of our ~~vessels. We believe~~ships on order, not including any ships on order by our Partner Brands, was approximately $13.0 billion, of which we ~~have meritorious defenses~~had deposited $323.2 million as of such date. Approximately 53.8% of the aggregate cost was exposed to fluctuations in the ~~allegations~~Euro exchange rate at September 30, 2017. Refer to Note 10. Fair Value Measurements and we are cooperating with the state of Alaska. We do not believe that the ultimate outcome of these claims will have a material adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations and cash flows.Derivative Instruments for further information.

Litigation

We are routinely involved in ~~other~~ claims typical within the cruise vacation industry. The majority of these claims are covered by insurance. We believe the outcome of such claims, net of expected insurance recoveries, will not have a material adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations and cash flows.

Other

In July 2016, we executed an agreement with Miami Dade County (“MDC”), which was simultaneously assigned to Sumitomo Banking Corporation (“SMBC”), to lease land from MDC and construct a new cruise terminal at PortMiami in Miami, Florida. The terminal is expected to be approximately 170,000 square-feet and will serve as a homeport. During the construction period, SMBC will fund the costs of the terminal’s construction and land lease. Upon completion of the terminal's construction, we will operate and lease the terminal from SMBC for a five-year term. We determined that the lease arrangement between SMBC and us should be accounted for as an operating lease upon completion of the terminal.

If any person acquires ownership of more than 50% of our common stock or, subject to certain exceptions, during any 24-month period, a majority of the Board is no longer comprised of individuals who were members of the Board on the first day of such period, we may be obligated to prepay indebtedness outstanding under our credit facilities, which we may be unable to replace on similar terms. Our public debt securities also contain change of control provisions that would be triggered by a third-party acquisition of greater than 50% of our common stock coupled with a ratings downgrade. If this were to occur, it would have an adverse impact on our liquidity and operations.

Note 8. Shareholders’ Equity

In September 2017, we declared a cash dividend on our common stock of $0.60 per share which was paid in October 2017. During the first and second quarters of 2017, we declared a cash dividend on our common stock of $0.48 per share which was paid in April 2017 and July 2017, respectively. During the first quarter of 2017, we also paid a cash dividend on our common stock of $0.48 per share which was declared during the fourth quarter of 2016.

During the third quarter of 2016, we declared a cash dividend on our common stock of $0.48 per share which was paid in October of 2016. During the first and second quarters of 2016, we declared and paid a cash dividend on our common stock of $0.375 per share. During the first quarter of 2016, we also paid a cash dividend on our common stock of $0.375 per share which was declared during the fourth quarter of 2015.

During the third quarter of 2015, we declared a cash dividend on our common stock of $0.375 per share which was paid in October of 2015. During the first and second quarters of 2015, we declared and paid a cash dividend on our common stock of $0.30 per share. During the first quarter of 2015, we also paid a cash dividend on our common stock of $0.30 per share which was declared during the fourth quarter of 2014.

~~Table of Contents~~

In ~~October 2015,~~April 2017, our board of directors authorized a 12-month common stock repurchase program for up to $500 ~~million that was completed in August 2016.~~million. The timing and number of shares to be repurchased will depend on a variety of factors including price and market conditions. Repurchases under the program may be made at management's discretion from time to time on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. During the ~~first, second and~~ third ~~quarters~~quarter of ~~2016,~~2017, we ~~purchased 2.8 million, 0.6 million and 0.7~~repurchased 1.0 million shares ~~respectively,~~of our common stock for a total of ~~$200.0~~$125.0 million ~~$50.0 million and $50.0 million, respectively,~~ in open market ~~transactions. These~~ transactions that were recorded within Treasury stock in our consolidated balance ~~sheet. Our~~sheets. With these repurchases, we have $375.0 million that remain available for future stock repurchase transactions under ~~this program, including the $200.0 million of stock repurchased during the fourth quarter of 2015, totaled $500.0 million.~~our Board approved program.

Note 9. Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The following table presents the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016 (in thousands):


	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016												Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015												Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017												Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
	Changes related to cash flow derivative hedges			Changes in defined benefit plans			Foreign currency translation adjustments			Accumulated other comprehensive loss			Changes related to cash flow derivative hedges			Changes in defined benefit plans			Foreign currency translation adjustments			Accumulated other comprehensive loss			Changes related to cash flow derivative hedges			Changes in defined benefit plans			Foreign currency translation adjustments			Accumulated other comprehensive loss			Changes related to cash flow derivative hedges			Changes in defined benefit plans			Foreign currency translation adjustments			Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Accumulated comprehensive loss at beginning of the year	$	(1,232,073	)	$	(26,447	)	$	(69,913	)	$	(1,328,433	)	$	(826,026	)	$	(31,207	)	$	(39,761	)	$	(896,994	)	$	(820,850	)	$	(28,083	)	$	(67,551	)	$	(916,484	)	$	(1,232,073	)	$	(26,447	)	$	(69,913	)	$	(1,328,433	)
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications	(9,150		)	(13,521		)	8,423			(14,248		)	(483,946		)	4,213			(23,994		)	(503,727		)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications																									230,341			(7,130		)	14,210			237,421			(9,150		)	(13,521		)	8,423			(14,248		)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss	263,774			1,373			—			265,147			202,978			1,354			—			204,332			151,319			850			—			152,169			263,774			1,373			—			265,147
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)	254,624			(12,148		)	8,423			250,899			(280,968		)	5,567			(23,994		)	(299,395		)	381,660			(6,280		)	14,210			389,590			254,624			(12,148		)	8,423			250,899
Ending balance	$	(977,449	)	$	(38,595	)	$	(61,490	)	$	(1,077,534	)	$	(1,106,994	)	$	(25,640	)	$	(63,755	)	$	(1,196,389	)	$	(439,190	)	$	(34,363	)	$	(53,341	)	$	(526,894	)	$	(977,449	)	$	(38,595	)	$	(61,490	)	$	(1,077,534	)

The following table presents reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016 (in thousands):


	Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) into Income													Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) into Income
Details About Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Components	Quarter Ended September 30, 2016			Quarter Ended September 30, 2015			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015			Affected Line Item in Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)	Quarter Ended September 30, 2017			Quarter Ended September 30, 2016			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016			Affected Line Item in Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(Loss) gain on cash flow derivative hedges:
Loss on cash flow derivative hedges:
Interest rate swaps	$	(11,953	)	$	(10,276	)	$	(32,019	)	$	(27,024	)	Interest expense, net of interest capitalized	$	(7,860	)	$	(11,953	)	$	(24,580	)	$	(32,019	)	Interest expense, net of interest capitalized
Foreign currency forward contracts	(2,710		)	(752		)	(5,408		)	(2,153		)	Depreciation and amortization expenses	(2,710		)	(2,710		)	(8,130		)	(5,408		)	Depreciation and amortization expenses
Foreign currency forward contracts	(3,465		)	(239		)	(10,206		)	(715		)	Other income	(1,512		)	(3,465		)	(9,187		)	(10,206		)	Other expense
Foreign currency forward contracts	—			—			(207		)	—			Other operating	—			—			—			(207		)	Other operating
Foreign currency collar options	(601		)	(568		)	(1,806		)	(1,003		)	Depreciation and amortization expenses	(602		)	(601		)	(1,806		)	(1,806		)	Depreciation and amortization expenses
Fuel swaps	2,760			—			9,356			—			Other income	1,758			2,760			6,533			9,356			Other expense
Fuel swaps	(64,654		)	(65,975		)	(223,484		)	(172,083		)	Fuel	(32,386		)	(64,654		)	(114,149		)	(223,484		)	Fuel
	(80,623		)	(77,810		)	(263,774		)	(202,978		)		(43,312		)	(80,623		)	(151,319		)	(263,774		)
Amortization of defined benefit plans:
Actuarial loss	(285		)	(354		)	(1,373		)	(1,061		)	Payroll and related	(293		)	(285		)	(850		)	(1,373		)	Payroll and related
Prior service costs	—			—			—			(293		)	Payroll and related
	(285		)	(354		)	(1,373		)	(1,354		)		(293		)	(285		)	(850		)	(1,373		)
Total reclassifications for the period	$	(80,908	)	$	(78,164	)	$	(265,147	)	$	(204,332	)		$	(43,605	)	$	(80,908	)	$	(152,169	)	$	(265,147	)

Table of Contents

Note 10. Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments

Fair Value Measurements

The estimated fair value of our financial instruments that are not measured at fair value, categorized based upon the fair value hierarchy, are as follows (in thousands):


	Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2016 Using										Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2015 Using										Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2017 Using										Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016 Using
Description	Total Carrying Amount		Total Fair Value		Level 1⁽¹⁾		Level 2⁽²⁾		Level 3⁽³⁾		Total Carrying Amount		Total Fair Value		Level 1⁽¹⁾		Level 2⁽²⁾		Level 3⁽³⁾		Total Carrying Amount		Total Fair Value		Level 1⁽¹⁾		Level 2⁽²⁾		Level 3⁽³⁾		Total Carrying Amount		Total Fair Value		Level 1⁽¹⁾		Level 2⁽²⁾		Level 3⁽³⁾
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents⁽⁴⁾	$	178,428	$	178,428	$	178,428	$	—	$	—	$	121,565	$	121,565	$	121,565	$	—	$	—	$	139,950	$	139,950	$	139,950	$	—	$	—	$	132,603	$	132,603	$	132,603	$	—	$	—
Total Assets	$	178,428	$	178,428	$	178,428	$	—	$	—	$	121,565	$	121,565	$	121,565	$	—	$	—	$	139,950	$	139,950	$	139,950	$	—	$	—	$	132,603	$	132,603	$	132,603	$	—	$	—
Liabilities:
Long-term debt (including current portion of long-term debt)⁽⁵⁾	$	9,675,483	$	10,225,707	$	1,232,284	$	8,993,423	$	—	$	8,478,473	$	8,895,009	$	1,536,629	$	7,358,380	$	—	$	7,557,801	$	8,111,168	$	—	$	8,111,168	$	—	$	9,347,051	$	9,859,266	$	—	$	9,859,266	$	—
Total Liabilities	$	9,675,483	$	10,225,707	$	1,232,284	$	8,993,423	$	—	$	8,478,473	$	8,895,009	$	1,536,629	$	7,358,380	$	—	$	7,557,801	$	8,111,168	$	—	$	8,111,168	$	—	$	9,347,051	$	9,859,266	$	—	$	9,859,266	$	—

~~(1)~~


(1)	Inputs based on quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access. Valuation of these items does not entail a significant amount of judgment.

(2)

Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the liability, either directly or indirectly. For unsecured revolving credit facilities and unsecured term loans, fair value is determined utilizing the income valuation approach. This valuation model takes into account the contract terms of our debt such as the debt maturity and the interest rate on the debt. The valuation model also takes into account the creditworthiness of the Company.


(3)	Inputs that are unobservable. The Company did not use any Level 3 inputs as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.


(4)	Consists of cash and marketable securities with original maturities of less than 90 days.


(5)	Consists of unsecured revolving credit facilities, senior notes, senior debentures and term loans. This does not include our capital lease obligations.

Table of ~~these items does not entail a significant amount of judgment.~~Contents

(2) Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the liability, either directly or indirectly. For unsecured revolving credit facilities and unsecured term loans, fair value is determined utilizing the income valuation approach. This valuation model takes into account the contract terms of our debt such as the debt maturity and the interest rate on the debt. The valuation model also takes into account the creditworthiness of the Company.

~~(3) Inputs that are unobservable. The Company did not use any Level 3 inputs as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.~~

~~(4) Consists of cash and marketable securities with original maturities of less than 90 days.~~

~~(5) Consists of unsecured revolving credit facilities, senior notes, senior debentures and term loans. Does not include our capital lease obligations.~~

Other Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts of accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued interest and accrued expenses approximate fair value at September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.

~~Table of Contents~~

Assets and liabilities that are recorded at fair value have been categorized based upon the fair value hierarchy. The following table presents information about the Company’s financial instruments recorded at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):


	Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2016 Using								Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2015 Using								Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2017 Using								Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016 Using
Description	Total		Level 1⁽¹⁾		Level 2⁽²⁾		Level 3⁽³⁾		Total		Level 1⁽¹⁾		Level 2⁽²⁾		Level 3⁽³⁾		Total		Level 1⁽¹⁾		Level 2⁽²⁾		Level 3⁽³⁾		Total		Level 1⁽¹⁾		Level 2⁽²⁾		Level 3⁽³⁾
Assets:
Derivative financial instruments⁽⁴⁾	$	36,697	$	—	$	36,697	$	—	$	134,574	$	—	$	134,574	$	—	$	221,258	$	—	$	221,258	$	—	$	19,397	$	—	$	19,397	$	—
Investments⁽⁵⁾	$	3,669	3,669		—		—		$	3,965	3,965		—		—		$	3,237	3,237		—		—		$	3,576	3,576		—		—
Total Assets	$	40,366	$	3,669	$	36,697	$	—	$	138,539	$	3,965	$	134,574	$	—	$	224,495	$	3,237	$	221,258	$	—	$	22,973	$	3,576	$	19,397	$	—
Liabilities:
Derivative financial instruments⁽⁶⁾	$	507,202	$	—	$	507,202	$	—	$	1,044,292	$	—	$	1,044,292	$	—	$	189,163	$	—	$	189,163	$	—	$	373,497	$	—	$	373,497	$	—
Total Liabilities	$	507,202	$	—	$	507,202	$	—	$	1,044,292	$	—	$	1,044,292	$	—	$	189,163	$	—	$	189,163	$	—	$	373,497	$	—	$	373,497	$	—

(1) Inputs based on quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access. Valuation of these items does not entail a significant amount of judgment.

(2) Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. For foreign currency forward contracts, interest rate swaps, cross currency swaps and fuel swaps, fair value is derived using valuation models that utilize the income valuation approach. These valuation models take into account the contract terms, such as maturity, as well as other inputs, such as foreign exchange rates and curves, fuel types, fuel curves and interest rate yield curves. Fair value for foreign currency collar options is determined by using standard option pricing models with inputs based on the options’ contract terms, such as exercise price and maturity, and readily available public market data, such as foreign exchange curves, foreign exchange volatility levels and discount rates. All derivative instrument fair values take into account the creditworthiness of the counterparty and the Company.

~~(3) Inputs that are unobservable. The Company did not use any Level 3 inputs as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.~~

~~(4) Consists of foreign currency forward contracts, interest rate swaps and fuel swaps. Please refer to the “Fair Value of Derivative Instruments” table for breakdown by instrument type.~~

~~(5) Consists of exchange-traded equity securities and mutual funds reported within~~ ~~Other assets~~ ~~in our consolidated balance sheets.~~

~~(6)~~


(1)	Inputs based on quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access. Valuation of these items does not entail a significant amount of judgment.

(2)

Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. For foreign currency forward contracts, interest rate swaps, cross currency swaps and fuel swaps, fair value is derived using valuation models that utilize the income valuation approach. These valuation models take into account the contract terms, such as maturity, as well as other inputs, such as foreign exchange rates and curves, fuel types, fuel curves and interest rate yield curves. Fair value for foreign currency collar options is determined by using standard option pricing models with inputs based on the options’ contract terms, such as exercise price and maturity, and readily available public market data, such as foreign exchange curves, foreign exchange volatility levels and discount rates. All derivative instrument fair values take into account the creditworthiness of the counterparty and the Company.


(3)	Inputs that are unobservable. The Company did not use any Level 3 inputs as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.


(4)	Consists of foreign currency forward contracts, interest rate swaps and fuel swaps. Please refer to the “Fair Value of Derivative Instruments” table for breakdown by instrument type.


(5)	Consists of exchange-traded equity securities and mutual funds reported within Other assets in our consolidated balance sheets.


(6)	Consists of foreign currency forward contracts, interest rate swaps and fuel swaps. Please refer to the “Fair Value of Derivative Instruments” table for breakdown by instrument type.

The reported fair values are based on a variety of factors and assumptions. Accordingly, the fair values may not represent actual values of the financial instruments that could have been realized as of September 30, ~~2016~~2017 or December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, or that will be realized in the future, and do not include expenses that could be incurred in an actual sale or settlement.

We have master International Swaps and Derivatives Association (“ISDA”) agreements in place with our derivative instrument counterparties. These ISDA agreements provide for final close out netting with our counterparties for all positions in the case of default or termination of the ISDA agreement. We have determined that our ISDA agreements provide us with rights of setoff on the fair value of derivative instruments in a gain position and those in a loss position with the same counterparty. We have elected not to offset such derivative instrument fair values in our consolidated balance sheets.

Table of Contents

~~As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, no cash collateral was received or pledged under our ISDA agreements.~~ See Credit Related Contingent Features for further discussion on contingent collateral requirements for our derivative instruments.

~~Table of Contents~~

The following table presents information about the Company’s offsetting of financial assets under master netting agreements with derivative counterparties:


	Gross Amounts not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet that are Subject to Master Netting Agreements																		Gross Amounts not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet that are Subject to Master Netting Agreements
	As of September 30, 2016									As of December 31, 2015									As of September 30, 2017									As of December 31, 2016
	Gross Amount of Derivative Assets Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet		Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting Recognized Derivative Liabilities			Cash Collateral Received		Net Amount of Derivative Assets		Gross Amount of Derivative Assets Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet		Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting Recognized Derivative Assets			Cash Collateral Received		Net Amount of Derivative Assets		Gross Amount of Derivative Assets Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet		Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting Recognized Derivative Liabilities			Cash Collateral Received		Net Amount of Derivative Assets		Gross Amount of Derivative Assets Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet		Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting Recognized Derivative Assets			Cash Collateral Received		Net Amount of Derivative Assets
(In thousands)
Derivatives subject to master netting agreements	$	36,697	$	(34,517	)	$	—	$	2,180	$	134,574	$	(129,815	)	$	—	$	4,759	$	221,258	$	(117,065	)	$	—	$	104,193	$	19,397	$	(19,397	)	$	—	$	—
Total	$	36,697	$	(34,517	)	$	—	$	2,180	$	134,574	$	(129,815	)	$	—	$	4,759	$	221,258	$	(117,065	)	$	—	$	104,193	$	19,397	$	(19,397	)	$	—	$	—

The following table presents information about the Company’s offsetting of financial liabilities under master netting agreements with derivative counterparties:


	Gross Amounts not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet that are Subject to Master Netting Agreements																				Gross Amounts not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet that are Subject to Master Netting Agreements
	As of September 30, 2016										As of December 31, 2015										As of September 30, 2017										As of December 31, 2016
	Gross Amount of Derivative Liabilities Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet			Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting Recognized Derivative Assets		Cash Collateral Pledged		Net Amount of Derivative Liabilities			Gross Amount of Derivative Liabilities Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet			Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting Recognized Derivative Liabilities		Cash Collateral Pledged		Net Amount of Derivative Liabilities			Gross Amount of Derivative Liabilities Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet			Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting Recognized Derivative Assets		Cash Collateral Pledged		Net Amount of Derivative Liabilities			Gross Amount of Derivative Liabilities Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet			Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting Recognized Derivative Liabilities		Cash Collateral Pledged		Net Amount of Derivative Liabilities
(In thousands)
Derivatives subject to master netting agreements	$	(507,202	)	$	34,517	$	—	$	(472,685	)	$	(1,044,292	)	$	129,815	$	—	$	(914,477	)	$	(189,163	)	$	117,065	$	—	$	(72,098	)	$	(373,497	)	$	19,397	$	7,213	$	(346,887	)
Total	$	(507,202	)	$	34,517	$	—	$	(472,685	)	$	(1,044,292	)	$	129,815	$	—	$	(914,477	)	$	(189,163	)	$	117,065	$	—	$	(72,098	)	$	(373,497	)	$	19,397	$	7,213	$	(346,887	)

Concentrations of Credit Risk

We monitor our credit risk associated with financial and other institutions with which we conduct significant business and, to minimize these risks, we select counterparties with credit risks acceptable to us and we seek to limit our exposure to an individual counterparty. Credit risk, including but not limited to counterparty nonperformance under derivative instruments, our credit facilities and new ship progress payment guarantees, is not considered significant, as we primarily conduct business with large, well-established financial institutions, insurance companies and export credit agencies many of which we have long-term relationships with and which have credit risks acceptable to us or where the credit risk is spread out among a large number of counterparties. As of September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, we had counterparty credit risk exposure under our derivative instruments of approximately ~~$2.3~~$101.6 million, which was limited to the cost of replacing the contracts in the event of non-performance by the counterparties to the contracts, the majority of which are currently our lending banks. As of December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, we ~~had counterparty credit risk~~did not have any exposure under our derivative instruments of approximately $4.8 million, which was limited to the cost of replacing the contracts in the event of non-performance by the counterparties to the contracts, the majority of which are currently our lending banks.instruments. We do not anticipate nonperformance by any of our significant counterparties. In addition, we have established guidelines we follow regarding credit ratings and instrument maturities to maintain safety and liquidity. We do not normally require collateral or other security to support credit relationships; however, in certain circumstances this option is available to us.

Table of Contents

Derivative Instruments

We are exposed to market risk attributable to changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and fuel prices. We ~~manage~~try to mitigate these risks through a combination of our normal operating and financing activities and through the use of derivative financial instruments pursuant to our hedging practices and policies. The financial impact of these hedging instruments is primarily offset by corresponding changes in the underlying exposures being hedged. We achieve this by closely matching the notional amount, term and conditions of the derivative instrument with the underlying risk being hedged. Although certain of our derivative financial instruments do not qualify or are not accounted for under hedge accounting, ~~we do~~our objective is not to hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes. ~~We monitor our derivative positions using techniques including market valuations and sensitivity analyses.~~

We enter into various forward, swap and option contracts to manage our interest rate exposure and to limit our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and fuel prices. These instruments are recorded on the balance sheet at their fair value and the vast majority are designated as hedges. We also use non-derivative financial instruments designated as hedges of our net investment in our foreign operations and investments.

At inception of the hedge relationship, a derivative instrument that hedges the exposure to changes in the fair value of a firm commitment or a recognized asset or liability is designated as a fair value hedge. A derivative instrument that hedges a forecasted transaction or the variability of cash flows related to a recognized asset or liability is designated as a cash flow hedge.

Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated as fair value hedges are offset against changes in the fair value of the underlying hedged assets, liabilities or firm commitments. Gains and losses on derivatives that are designated as cash flow hedges are recorded as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss until the underlying hedged transactions are recognized in earnings. The foreign currency transaction gain or loss of our non-derivative financial instruments and the changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as hedges of our net investment in foreign operations and investments are recognized as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss along with the associated foreign currency translation adjustment of the foreign ~~operation.~~operation or investment.

On an ongoing basis, we assess whether derivatives used in hedging transactions are “highly effective” in offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flow of hedged items. We use the long-haul method to assess hedge effectiveness using regression analysis for each hedge relationship under our interest rate, foreign currency and fuel hedging programs. We apply the same methodology on a consistent basis for assessing hedge effectiveness to all hedges within each hedging program (i.e., interest rate, foreign currency and fuel). We perform regression analyses over an observation period of up to three years, utilizing market data relevant to the hedge horizon of each hedge relationship. High effectiveness is achieved when a statistically valid relationship reflects a high degree of offset and correlation between the changes in the fair values of the derivative instrument and the hedged item. The determination of ineffectiveness is based on the amount of dollar offset between the change in fair value of the derivative instrument and the change in fair value of the hedged item at the end of the reporting period. If it is determined that a derivative is not highly effective as a hedge or hedge accounting is discontinued, any change in fair value of the derivative since the last date at which it was determined to be effective is recognized in earnings. In addition, the ineffective portion of our highly effective hedges is immediately recognized in earnings and reported in Other ~~income~~expense in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).

Cash flows from derivative instruments that are designated as fair value or cash flow hedges are classified in the same category as the cash flows from the underlying hedged items. In the event that hedge accounting is discontinued, cash flows subsequent to the date of discontinuance are classified within investing activities. Cash flows from derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments are classified as investing activities.

We consider the classification of the underlying hedged item’s cash flows in determining the classification for the designated derivative instrument’s cash flows. We classify derivative instrument cash flows from hedges of benchmark interest rate or hedges of fuel expense as operating activities due to the nature of the hedged item. Likewise, we classify derivative instrument cash flows from hedges of foreign currency risk on our newbuild ship payments as investing activities and derivative instrument cash flows from hedges of foreign currency risk on debt payments as financing activities.

Interest Rate Risk

Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates to our long-term debt obligations including future interest payments. At September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, approximately ~~41.4%~~48.8% and ~~31.2%~~40.5%, respectively, of our long-term debt was effectively fixed. We use interest rate swap agreements to modify our exposure to interest rate movements and to manage our interest expense.

Table of Contents

Market risk associated with our long-term fixed rate debt is the potential increase in fair value resulting from a decrease in interest rates. We use interest rate swap agreements that effectively convert a portion of our fixed-rate debt to a floating-rate basis to manage this risk. At September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, we maintained interest rate swap agreements on the following fixed-rate debt instruments:


Debt Instrument	Swap Notional as of September 30, 2016 (In thousands)		Maturity	Debt Fixed Rate	Swap Floating Rate: LIBOR plus	All-in Swap Floating Rate as of September 30, 2016	Swap Notional as of September 30, 2017 (In thousands)		Maturity	Debt Fixed Rate	Swap Floating Rate: LIBOR plus	All-in Swap Floating Rate as of September 30, 2017
Oasis of the Seas term loan	$	192,500	October 2021	5.41%	3.87%	4.78%	$	157,500	October 2021	5.41%	3.87%	5.29%
Unsecured senior notes	650,000		November 2022	5.25%	3.63%	4.45%	650,000		November 2022	5.25%	3.63%	4.95%
	$	842,500					$	807,500

These interest rate swap agreements are accounted for as fair value hedges.

Market risk associated with our long-term floating rate debt is the potential increase in interest expense from an increase in interest rates. We use interest rate swap agreements that effectively convert a portion of our floating-rate debt to a fixed-rate basis to manage this risk. At September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, we maintained interest rate swap agreements on the following floating-rate debt instruments:


Debt Instrument	Swap Notional as of September 30, 2016 (In thousands)		Maturity	Debt Floating Rate		All-in Swap Fixed Rate	Swap Notional as of September 30, 2017 (In thousands)		Maturity	Debt Floating Rate		All-in Swap Fixed Rate
Celebrity Reflection term loan	$	463,604	October 2024	LIBOR plus	0.40%	2.85%	$	409,063	October 2024	LIBOR plus	0.40%	2.85%
Quantum of the Seas term loan	643,125		October 2026	LIBOR plus	1.30%	3.74%	581,875		October 2026	LIBOR plus	1.30%	3.74%
Anthem of the Seas term loan	664,583		April 2027	LIBOR plus	1.30%	3.86%	604,167		April 2027	LIBOR plus	1.30%	3.86%
Ovation of the Seas term loan	830,000		April 2028	LIBOR plus	1.00%	3.16%	760,833		April 2028	LIBOR plus	1.00%	3.16%
Harmony of the Seas term loan ⁽¹⁾	778,966		May 2028	EURIBOR plus	1.15%	2.26%	751,362		May 2028	EURIBOR plus	1.15%	2.26%
	$	3,380,278					$	3,107,300

(1)⁽¹⁾Interest rate swap agreements hedging the Euro-denominated term loan for Harmony of the Seas include EURIBOR zero-floors matching the hedged debt EURIBOR zero-floor. Amount presented is based on the exchange rate as of September 30, ~~2016.~~2017.

These interest rate swap agreements are accounted for as cash flow hedges.

The notional amount of interest rate swap agreements related to outstanding debt ~~and on our current unfunded financing arrangements~~ as of September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015~~2016 was ~~$4.2~~$3.9 billion and ~~$4.3~~$4.0 billion, respectively.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

Derivative Instruments

Our primary exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk relates to our ship construction contracts denominated in Euros, our foreign currency denominated debt and our international business operations. We enter into foreign currency forward contracts, collar options and cross currency swap agreements to manage portions of the exposure to movements in foreign currency exchange rates. As of September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the aggregate cost of our ships on ~~firm~~ order, not including the TUI Cruises' ships on order and those subject to conditions to effectiveness, was approximately ~~$5.3~~$13.0 billion, of which we had deposited ~~$282.0~~$323.2 million as of such date. At September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, approximately ~~56.1%~~53.8% and ~~58.2%~~66.7%, respectively, of the aggregate cost of the ships under construction was exposed to fluctuations in the Euro exchange rate. The majority of our foreign currency forward contracts, collar options and cross currency swap agreements are accounted for as cash flow, fair value or net investment hedges depending on the designation of the related hedge.

On a regular basis, we enter into foreign currency forward contracts and, from time to time, we utilize cross-currency swap agreements to minimize the volatility resulting from the remeasurement of net monetary assets and liabilities denominated in a currency other than our functional currency or the functional currencies of our foreign subsidiaries. During the third quarter of ~~2016,~~2017, we maintained an average of approximately ~~$801.9~~$823.0 million of these foreign currency forward contracts. These instruments are not designated as hedging instruments. Changes in the fair value of the foreign currency forward contracts resulted in a ~~loss,~~gain (loss), of approximately ~~$2.5~~$22.0 million and ~~$32.7~~$(2.5) million during the quarters ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, respectively, and approximately ~~$11.8~~$57.1 million and ~~$49.6~~$(11.8) million, during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, respectively, that were recognized in earnings within Other ~~income~~expense in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).

Table of Contents

We consider our investments in our foreign operations to be denominated in relatively stable currencies and of a long-term nature. As of September 30, 2017, we maintained foreign currency forward contracts and designated them as hedges of a portion of our net investment in TUI cruises of €101.0 million, or approximately $119.4 million based on the exchange rate at September 30, 2017. These forward currency contracts mature in October 2021.

The notional amount of outstanding foreign exchange contracts including our forward contracts as of September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015~~2016 was ~~$1.4~~$4.1 billion and ~~$2.4~~$1.3 billion, respectively.

Non-Derivative Instruments

We also address the exposure of our investments in foreign operations by denominating a portion of our debt in our subsidiaries’ and investments’ functional currencies and designating it as a hedge of these subsidiaries and investments. We had designated debt as a hedge of our net investments in TUI Cruises of approximately ~~€290.0~~€241.0 million, or approximately ~~$325.8~~$284.9 million, as of September 30, ~~2016.~~2017.

Fuel Price Risk

Our exposure to market risk for changes in fuel prices relates primarily to the consumption of fuel on our ships. We use fuel swap agreements to mitigate the financial impact of fluctuations in fuel prices.

Our fuel swap agreements are accounted for as cash flow hedges. At September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, we have hedged the variability in future cash flows for certain forecasted fuel transactions occurring through ~~2020.~~2021. As of September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, we had the following outstanding fuel swap agreements:


	Fuel Swap Agreements		Fuel Swap Agreements
	As of September 30, 2016	As of December 31, 2015	As of September 30, 2017	As of December 31, 2016
	(metric tons)		(metric tons)
2016	231,000	930,000
2017	799,000	854,000	218,600	799,065
2018	616,000	583,000	756,700	616,300
2019	521,000	231,000	668,500	521,000
2020	307,000	—	531,200	306,500
2021			224,900	—


	Fuel Swap Agreements				Fuel Swap Agreements
	As of September 30, 2016		As of December 31, 2015		As of September 30, 2017		As of December 31, 2016
	(% hedged)				(% hedged)
Projected fuel purchases:
2016	68	%	65	%
2017	60	%	59	%	65	%	60	%
2018	45	%	40	%	56	%	44	%
2019	36	%	15	%	47	%	35	%
2020	20	%	—		36	%	20	%
2021					14	%	—

Table of Contents

At September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015, $196.2~~2016, $81.7 million and ~~$321.0~~$138.5 million, respectively, of estimated unrealized net loss associated with our cash flow hedges pertaining to fuel swap agreements were expected to be reclassified to earnings from Accumulated other comprehensive loss within the next twelve months. Reclassification is expected to occur as the result of fuel consumption associated with our hedged forecasted fuel purchases.

~~Table of Contents~~

The fair value and line item caption of derivative instruments recorded within our consolidated balance sheets were as follows:


	Fair Value of Derivative Instruments																		Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
	Asset Derivatives									Liability Derivatives									Asset Derivatives									Liability Derivatives
	Balance Sheet Location		As of September 30, 2016				As of December 31, 2015			Balance Sheet Location		As of September 30, 2016				As of December 31, 2015			Balance Sheet Location		As of September 30, 2017				As of December 31, 2016			Balance Sheet Location		As of September 30, 2017				As of December 31, 2016
		Fair Value				Fair Value					Fair Value				Fair Value					Fair Value				Fair Value					Fair Value				Fair Value
(In thousands)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815-20⁽¹⁾
Interest rate swaps		Other assets		$	15,371			$	—		Other long-term liabilities		$	139,322			$	67,371		Other assets		$	1,760			$	5,246		Other long-term liabilities		$	52,611			$	57,679
Foreign currency forward contracts	Derivative financial instruments		—				93,996			Derivative financial instruments		136				320,873			Derivative financial instruments		45,583				—			Derivative financial instruments		—				5,574
Foreign currency forward contracts	Other assets		6,926				—			Other long-term liabilities		7,392				—			Other assets		136,534				—			Other long-term liabilities		4,479				68,165
Fuel swaps	Derivative financial instruments		—				—			Derivative financial instruments		183,470				307,475			Derivative financial instruments		7,213				—			Derivative financial instruments		81,981				129,486
Fuel swaps	Other assets		13,038				—			Other long-term liabilities		149,110				325,055			Other assets		29,721				13,608			Other long-term liabilities		40,517				95,125
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments under 815-20			35,335				93,996					479,430				1,020,774					220,811				18,854					179,588				356,029
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815-20
Foreign currency forward contracts	Derivative financial instruments		$	—			$	32,339		Derivative financial instruments		$	—			$	—
Fuel swaps	Derivative financial instruments		928				8,239			Derivative financial instruments		18,271				23,518			Derivative financial instruments		—				—			Derivative financial instruments		7,352				11,532
Fuel swaps	Other Assets		434				—			Other long-term liabilities		9,501				—			Other Assets		447				543			Other long-term liabilities		2,223				5,936
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under 815-20			1,362				40,578					27,772				23,518					447				543					9,575				17,468
Total derivatives			$	36,697			$	134,574				$	507,202			$	1,044,292				$	221,258			$	19,397				$	189,163			$	373,497

(1) Accounting Standard Codification 815-20 “Derivatives and Hedging.”

The carrying value and line item caption of non-derivative instruments designated as hedging instruments recorded within our consolidated

balance sheets were as follows:


		Carrying Value					Carrying Value
Non-derivative instrument designated as hedging instrument under ASC 815-20	Balance Sheet Location	As of September 30, 2016		As of December 31, 2015		Balance Sheet Location	As of September 30, 2017		As of December 31, 2016
(In thousands)
Foreign currency debt	Current portion of long-term debt	$	65,595	$	—	Current portion of long-term debt	$	69,023	$	61,601
Foreign currency debt	Long-term debt	260,191		—		Long-term debt	215,863		249,624
		$	325,786	$	—		$	284,886	$	311,225

Table of Contents

The effect of derivative instruments qualifying and designated as hedging instruments and the related hedged items in fair value hedges on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) was as follows:


Derivatives and Related Hedged Items under ASC 815-20 Fair Value Hedging Relationships	Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative and Hedged Item	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative									Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Hedged Item											Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative and Hedged Item	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative										Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Hedged Item
		Quarter Ended September 30, 2016			Quarter Ended September 30, 2015		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015		Quarter Ended September 30, 2016		Quarter Ended September 30, 2015			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015				Quarter Ended September 30, 2017			Quarter Ended September 30, 2016			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016		Quarter Ended September 30, 2017		Quarter Ended September 30, 2016		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
(In thousands)
Interest rate swaps	Interest expense, net of interest capitalized	$	1,737		$	2,793	$	6,075	$	8,640	$	—	$	3,968		$	7,203		$	11,775		Interest expense, net of interest capitalized	$	600		$	1,737		$	2,642	$	6,075	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	7,203
Interest rate swaps	Other income	(7,662		)	22,341		28,592		21,780		7,423		(20,252		)	(24,878		)	(18,245		)	Other expense	(545		)	(7,662		)	3,275		28,592		1,013		7,423		(841		)	(24,878		)
		$	(5,925	)	$	25,134	$	34,667	$	30,420	$	7,423	$	(16,284	)	$	(17,675	)	$	(6,470	)		$	55		$	(5,925	)	$	5,917	$	34,667	$	1,013	$	7,423	$	(841	)	$	(17,675	)

The effect of derivative instruments qualifying and designated as cash flow hedging instruments on the consolidated financial statements was as follows:


Derivatives under ASC 815-20 Cash Flow Hedging Relationships	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) on Derivative (Effective Portion)												Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss into Income (Effective Portion)		Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) into Income (Effective Portion)															Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) on Derivative (Effective Portion)													Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss into Income (Effective Portion)	Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) into Income (Effective Portion)
	Quarter Ended September 30, 2016			Quarter Ended September 30, 2015			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015				Quarter Ended September 30, 2016				Quarter Ended September 30, 2015				Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016				Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015			Quarter Ended September 30, 2017			Quarter Ended September 30, 2016			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016				Quarter Ended September 30, 2017			Quarter Ended September 30, 2016			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
(In thousands)
Interest rate swaps	$	6,598		$	(68,956	)	$	(126,505	)	$	(75,104	)	Interest expense, net of interest capitalized		$	(11,953	)		$	(10,276	)		$	(32,019	)		$	(27,024	)	$	(3,154	)	$	6,598		$	(24,703	)	$	(126,505	)		Interest expense, net of interest capitalized	$	(7,860	)	$	(11,953	)	$	(24,580	)	$	(32,019	)
Foreign currency forward contracts	11,405			(619		)	22,715			(131,211		)	Depreciation and amortization expenses		(2,710		)		(752		)		(5,408		)		(2,153		)	122,211			11,405			221,861			22,715				Depreciation and amortization expenses	(2,710		)	(2,710		)	(8,130		)	(5,408		)
Foreign currency forward contracts	—			—			—			—			Other income		(3,465		)		(239		)		(10,206		)		(715		)	—			—			—			—				Other expense	(1,512		)	(3,465		)	(9,187		)	(10,206		)
Foreign currency forward contracts	—			—			—			—			Other operating		—				—				(207		)		—			—			—			—			—				Other operating	—			—			—			(207		)
Foreign currency collar options	—			34			—			(64,559		)	Depreciation and amortization expenses		(601		)		(568		)		(1,806		)		(1,003		)	—			—			—			—				Depreciation and amortization expenses	(602		)	(601		)	(1,806		)	(1,806		)
Fuel swaps	—			—			—			—			Other income		2,760				—				9,356				—			—			—			—			—				Other expense	1,758			2,760			6,533			9,356
Fuel swaps	(3,090		)	(230,761		)	94,640			(213,072		)	Fuel		(64,654		)		(65,975		)		(223,484		)		(172,083		)	67,878			(3,090		)	33,183			94,640				Fuel	(32,386		)	(64,654		)	(114,149		)	(223,484		)
	$	14,913		$	(300,302	)	$	(9,150	)	$	(483,946	)			$	(80,623	)		$	(77,810	)		$	(263,774	)		$	(202,978	)	$	186,935		$	14,913		$	230,341		$	(9,150	)			$	(43,312	)	$	(80,623	)	$	(151,319	)	$	(263,774	)

Table of Contents


Derivatives under ASC 815-20 Cash Flow Hedging Relationships	Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)												Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)
		Quarter Ended September 30, 2016			Quarter Ended September 30, 2015			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015				Quarter Ended September 30, 2017		Quarter Ended September 30, 2016			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
(In thousands)
Interest rate swaps	Other income	90			(617		)	(1,152		)	(395		)	Other expense	—		90			—		(1,152		)
Foreign currency forward contracts	Other income	—			—			(57		)	—			Other expense	75		—			100		(57		)
Fuel swaps	Other income	(8		)	(2,353		)	(3,949		)	(2,771		)	Other expense	3,351		(8		)	1,014		(3,949		)
		$	82		$	(2,970	)	$	(5,158	)	$	(3,166	)		$	3,426	$	82		$	1,114	$	(5,158	)

The effect of non-derivative instruments qualifying and designated as net investment hedging instruments on the consolidated financial statements was as follows:


	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Effective Portion)										Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Effective Portion)
Non-derivative instruments under ASC 815-20 Net Investment Hedging Relationships	Quarter Ended September 30, 2016			Quarter Ended September 30, 2015			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015		Quarter Ended September 30, 2017		Quarter Ended September 30, 2016			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
(In thousands)
Foreign Currency Debt	$	(3,382	)	$	(436	)	$	1,313	$	8,955	$	7,949	$	(3,382	)	$	34,206	$	1,313
	$	(3,382	)	$	(436	)	$	1,313	$	8,955	$	7,949	$	(3,382	)	$	34,206	$	1,313

There was no amount recognized in income (ineffective portion and amount excluded from effectiveness testing) for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, respectively.

The effect of derivatives not designated as hedging instruments on the consolidated financial statements was as follows:


		Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives													Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments under ASC 815-20	Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives	Quarter Ended September 30, 2016			Quarter Ended September 30, 2015			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015			Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives	Quarter Ended September 30, 2017			Quarter Ended September 30, 2016			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
(In thousands)
Foreign currency forward contracts	Other income	$	(2,464	)	$	(32,705	)	$	(11,712	)	$	(49,607	)	Other expense	$	21,951		$	(2,464	)	$	57,019		$	(11,712	)
Fuel swaps	Other income	(1,172		)	(76		)	(1,224		)	(191		)	Other expense	(175		)	(1,172		)	(255		)	(1,224		)
		$	(3,636	)	$	(32,781	)	$	(12,936	)	$	(49,798	)		$	21,776		$	(3,636	)	$	56,764		$	(12,936	)

Credit Related Contingent Features

Our current interest rate derivative instruments may require us to post collateral if our Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s credit ratings ~~remain~~are below specified levels. Specifically, if on the fifth anniversary of executing a derivative instrument, or on any succeeding fifth-year anniversary, our credit ratings for our senior unsecured debt were to be rated below BBB- by Standard & Poor’s and Baa3 by Moody’s, then the counterparty may periodically demand that we post collateral in an amount equal to the difference between (i) the net market value of all derivative transactions with such counterparty that have reached their fifth year anniversary, to the extent negative, and (ii) the applicable minimum call amount.

The amount of collateral required to be posted following such event will change as, and to the extent, our net liability position increases or decreases by more than the applicable minimum call amount. If our credit rating for our senior unsecured debt is subsequently equal to or above BBB- by Standard & Poor’s or Baa3 by Moody’s, then any collateral posted at such time will be released to us and we will no longer be required to post collateral unless we meet the collateral trigger requirement at the next fifth-year anniversary. ~~Currently,~~At September 30, 2017, four of our interest rate derivative instruments had reached their fifth anniversary; however, our senior unsecured debt credit rating ~~is BB+ with a stable outlook~~was BBB- by Standard & Poor’s and ~~Ba1 with a positive outlook~~Baa3 by ~~Moody’s. We currently have seven interest rate derivative hedges that have a term of at least five years. As of September 30, 2016, none of these instruments had reached their fifth anniversary~~Moody’s and, accordingly, we were not required to post any collateral as of such date.

~~During the next twelve months, four~~ As of December 31, 2016, two of our interest rate derivative ~~hedges will reach their fifth anniversary, with the first such anniversary to occur on November 2016. If each of these four interest rate hedges~~instruments had already reached its fifth anniversary as of September 30, 2016, our maximum collateral exposure would have been $96.8 million. Similarly, our maximum collateral exposure as of December 31, 2015, would have been $14.6

~~Table of Contents~~

~~million if all hedges scheduled to reach their fifth anniversary date within one year had instead~~ reached their fifth ~~anniversary~~anniversary. As our unsecured debt credit rating at December 31, 2016 was below BBB-/Baa3, we had posted $7.2 million in collateral as of ~~December 31, 2015.~~

~~Note 11. Restructuring Charges~~

~~Pullmantur Right-sizing Strategy~~

Pullmantur's strategy over the last several years had focused both on its core cruise market in Spain and on expansion throughout Latin America, especially Brazil. However, due to significant and increased challenges facing Pullmantur's Latin American operations, in 2015, we decided to significantly change our strategy from growing the brand through vessel transfers to a right-sizing strategy. This right-sizing strategy included reducing our exposure to Latin America, refocusing on the brand’s core market of Spain and, consequently, reducing the size of Pullmantur’s fleet.

~~The right-sizing strategy activities included the closing of Pullmantur's regional head office in Brazil, the redeployment of Pullmantur’s~~ ~~Empress~~ to the Royal Caribbean International brand and personnel reorganization in Pullmantur's headquarters and CDF's office in France. The closure of the Brazil office and the personnel reorganization resulted in the recognition of a liability for one-time termination benefits during the nine months ended September 30, 2016. We also incurred contract termination costs related to the closure of the Brazil office.

~~As a result of these actions, we incurred restructuring exit costs of $0.3 million and $2.5 million for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, which are reported within~~ ~~Restructuring charges~~ ~~in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).~~

~~The following table summarizes our restructuring exit costs related to the above strategy (in thousands):~~

Beginning
Balance
January 1, 2016 Accruals Payments Ending Balance September 30, 2016 Cumulative
Charges
Incurred
Termination benefits $ —
$ 2,416
$ 2,416
$ —
$ 2,416
Contract termination costs —
68
68
—
68
Total $ —
$ 2,484
$ 2,484
$ —
$ 2,484

~~In connection with this strategy, we incurred approximately $3.6 million of other costs during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, that primarily consisted of costs associated~~such date. Consistent with the ~~redeployment of Pullmantur's~~ ~~Empress~~ ~~to the Royal Caribbean International brand that were reported within~~ ~~Cruise operating expenses,Depreciation and amortization expenses~~ ~~and~~ ~~Marketing, selling and administrative expenses~~ ~~in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).~~

~~In July 2016, we sold 51%~~provisions of our interest ~~in RCHE, the parent company of the Pullmantur and CDF brands. In connection~~rate derivatives instruments, all collateral that was posted with ~~the sale, we incurred approximately $3.3 million of other costs during the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2016 that were reported within~~ ~~Cruise operating expenses~~ ~~and~~ ~~Marketing, selling and administrative expenses~~ in our ~~consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). Refer to Note 1.~~ ~~General~~ ~~for further information regarding this sale transaction.~~

~~Other Restructuring Initiatives~~

During the second and third quarters of 2016, we moved forward with certain other initiatives, including the closing of an international office in Brazil related to the Royal Caribbean International brand and personnel reorganization in our corporate offices. These initiatives resulted in restructuring costs of $1.5 million and $4.1 million for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively. The restructuring costs are mainly due to the recognition of a liability for one-time termination benefits. Through the remainder of 2016, we may incur additional immaterial costs as it relates to the restructuring at our corporate and international offices.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~The following table summarizes our restructuring exit costs related to the above initiatives (in thousands):~~

Beginning
Balance
January 1, 2016 Accruals Payments Ending Balance September 30, 2016 Cumulative
Charges
Incurred
Termination benefits $ —
$ 4,128
$ 1,584
$ 2,544
$ 4,128
Contract termination costs —
15
15
—
15
Total $ —
$ 4,143
$ 1,599
$ 2,544
$ 4,143
counterparties was returned upon reaching investment grade.

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Cautionary Note Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

The discussion under this caption "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and elsewhere in this document includes "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical fact, including statements regarding guidance (including our expectations for the fourth quarter and full year of ~~2016~~2017 and our earnings and yield estimates for ~~2016~~2017 set forth under the heading "Outlook" below), business and industry prospects or future results of operations or financial position, made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are forward-looking. Words such as "anticipate," "believe," "could," "estimate," "expect," "goal," "intend," "may," "plan," "project," "seek," "should," "will," "driving" and similar expressions are intended to further identify any of these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements reflect management's current expectations but they are based on judgments and are inherently uncertain. Furthermore, they are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from the future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied in those forward-looking statements. Examples of these risks, uncertainties and other factors include, but are not limited to, those discussed in ~~our Annual~~this Quarterly Report on Form ~~10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015~~10-Q and, in particular, the risks discussed under the caption "Risk Factors" in Part I,II, Item 1A ~~of that report.~~herein.

All forward-looking statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q speak only as of the date of this document. Given these risks and uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Overview

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations has been organized to present the following:

a review of our financial presentation, including discussion of certain operational and financial metrics we utilize to assist us in managing our business;

a discussion of our results of operations for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 compared to the same periods in ~~2015;~~2016;

a discussion of our business outlook, including our expectations for selected financial items for the fourth quarter and full year of ~~2016;~~2017; and

a discussion of our liquidity and capital resources, including our future capital and contractual commitments and potential funding sources.

Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies

For a discussion of our critical accounting policies, refer to Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations within our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.

Seasonality

Our revenues are seasonal based on demand for cruises. Demand is strongest for cruises during the Northern Hemisphere’s summer months and holidays. In order to mitigate the impact of the winter weather in the Northern Hemisphere and to capitalize on the summer season in the Southern Hemisphere, our brands have focused on deployment to the Caribbean, Asia and Australia during that period.

Financial Presentation

Description of Certain Line Items

Revenues

Our revenues are comprised of the following:

~~Table of Contents~~

Passenger ticket revenues, which consist of revenue recognized from the sale of passenger tickets and the sale of air transportation to and from our ships; and

Onboard and other revenues, which consist primarily of revenues from the sale of goods and/or services onboard our ships not included in passenger ticket prices, cancellation fees, sales of vacation protection insurance and pre- and post-cruise tours. Onboard and other revenues also includes revenues we receive from independent third party concessionaires that pay us a percentage of their revenues in exchange for the right to provide selected goods and/or services onboard our ships as well as revenues received for our bareboat charter, procurement and management related services we perform on behalf of our unconsolidated affiliates.

Cruise Operating Expenses

Our cruise operating expenses are comprised of the following:

Commissions, transportation and other expenses, which consist of those costs directly associated with passenger ticket revenues, including travel agent commissions, air and other transportation expenses, port costs that vary with passenger head counts and related credit card fees;

Onboard and other expenses, which consist of the direct costs associated with onboard and other revenues, including the costs of products sold onboard our ships, vacation protection insurance premiums, costs associated with pre- and post-cruise tours and related credit card fees as well as the minimal costs associated with concession revenues, as the costs are mostly incurred by third-party concessionaires, and costs incurred for the procurement and management related services we perform on behalf of our unconsolidated affiliates;

Payroll and related expenses, which consist of costs for shipboard personnel (costs associated with our shoreside personnel are included in Marketing, selling and administrative expenses);

Food expenses, which include food costs for both guests and crew;

Fuel expenses, which include fuel and related delivery, storage and emission consumable costs and the financial impact of fuel swap agreements; and

Other operating expenses, which consist primarily of operating costs, such as repairs and maintenance, port costs that do not vary with passenger head counts, vessel related insurance, entertainment and gains ~~and /or~~and/or losses related to the sale of our ~~ships, if any.~~ships.

We do not allocate payroll and related expenses, food expenses, fuel expenses or other operating expenses to the expense categories attributable to passenger ticket revenues or onboard and other revenues since they are incurred to provide the total cruise vacation experience.

Table of Contents

Selected Operational and Financial Metrics

We utilize a variety of operational and financial metrics which are defined below to evaluate our performance and financial condition. As discussed in more detail herein, certain of these metrics are non-GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP financial measures ~~which~~are provided along with the related GAAP financial measures as we believe they provide useful information to investors as a supplement to our consolidated financial statements, which are prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP. The presentation of non-GAAP financial information is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for, or superior to, the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP.

Adjusted Earnings per Share ("Adjusted EPS") represents Adjusted Net Income divided by weighted average shares outstanding or by diluted weighted average shares outstanding, as applicable. We believe that this non-GAAP measure is meaningful when assessing our performance on a comparative basis.

Adjusted Net Income represents net income excluding certain items that we believe adjusting for is meaningful when assessing our performance on a comparative basis. For the periods presented, these items included the ~~impairment of the Pullmantur related assets,~~ net loss related to the elimination of the Pullmantur reporting lag, the net gain related to the 51% sale of the Pullmantur and CDF Croisières de France ("CDF") brands, ~~and related costs,~~ restructuring charges and other initiative costs related to our Pullmantur right-sizing strategy and other restructuring initiatives.

~~Table of Contents~~

Available Passenger Cruise Days (“~~APCD”~~APCD”) is our measurement of capacity and represents double occupancy per cabin multiplied by the number of cruise days for the ~~period.~~period, which excludes canceled cruise days and drydock days. We use this measure to perform capacity and rate analysis to identify our main non-capacity drivers that cause our cruise revenue and expenses to vary.

Gross Cruise Costs represent the sum of total cruise operating expenses plus marketing, selling and administrative expenses.

Gross Yields represent total revenues per APCD.

Net Cruise Costs and Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel represent Gross Cruise Costs excluding commissions, transportation and other expenses and onboard and other expenses and, in the case of Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel, fuel expenses (each of which is described above under the Description of Certain Line Items heading). In measuring our ability to control costs in a manner that positively impacts net income, we believe changes in Net Cruise Costs and Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel to be the most relevant indicators of our performance. A reconciliation of historical Gross Cruise Costs to Net Cruise Costs and Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel is provided below under Results of Operations. ~~We have not provided a quantitative reconciliation of projected Gross Cruise Costs to projected Net Cruise Costs and projected Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel due to~~For the ~~significant uncertainty in projecting the costs deducted to arrive at these measures. Accordingly, we do not believe that reconciling information for such projected figures would be meaningful.~~periods presented, Net Cruise Costs excludes the net gain related to the 51% sale of the Pullmantur and CDF brands, restructuring charges and ~~related costs and~~other initiative costs related to our Pullmantur right-sizing strategy and other restructuring initiatives.

Net Revenues represent total revenues less commissions, transportation and other expenses and onboard and other expenses (each of which is described above under the Description of Certain Line Items heading).

Net Yields represent Net Revenues per APCD. We utilize Net Revenues and Net Yields to manage our business on a day-to-day basis as we believe that ~~it is~~they are the most relevant ~~measure~~measures of our pricing performance because ~~it reflects~~they reflect the cruise revenues earned by us net of our most significant variable costs, which are commissions, transportation and other expenses and onboard and other expenses. A reconciliation of historical Gross Yields to Net Yields is provided below under Results of Operations. We have not provided a quantitative reconciliation of projected Gross Yields to projected Net Yields due to the significant uncertainty in projecting the costs deducted to arrive at this measure. Accordingly, we do not believe that reconciling information for such projected figures would be meaningful. Net Yields excludes initiative costs related to the sale of the Pullmantur and CDF brands.

Occupancy, in accordance with cruise vacation industry practice, is calculated by dividing Passenger Cruise Days by APCD. A percentage in excess of 100% indicates that three or more passengers occupied some cabins.

Passenger Cruise Days represent the number of passengers carried for the period multiplied by the number of days of their respective cruises.

We believe Net Yields, Net Cruise Costs and Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel are our most relevant non-GAAP financial measures. However, a significant portion of our revenue and expenses are denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar. Because our reporting currency is the United States dollar, the value of these revenues and expenses can be affected by changes in currency exchange rates. Although such changes in local currency prices is just one of many elements impacting our revenues and expenses, it can be an important element. For this reason, we also monitor Net Yields, Net Cruise Costs and Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel as if the current periods’ currency exchange rates had remained constant with the comparable prior periods’ rates, or on a “Constant Currency” basis.

Table of Contents

It should be emphasized that Constant Currency is primarily used for comparing short-term changes and/or projections. Changes in guest sourcing and shifting the amount of purchases between currencies can change the impact of the purely currency-based fluctuations.

The use of certain significant non-GAAP measures, such as Net Yields, Net Cruise Costs and Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel, allows us to perform capacity and rate analysis to separate the impact of known capacity changes from other less predictable changes which affect our business. We believe these non-GAAP measures provide expanded insight to measure revenue and cost performance in addition to the ~~standard United States~~ GAAP based financial measures. There are no specific rules or regulations for determining non-GAAP and Constant Currency measures, and as such, there exists the possibility that they may not be comparable to other companies within the industry.

~~Table~~We have not provided a quantitative reconciliation of ~~Contents~~

(i) projected Total revenues to projected Net Revenues, (ii) projected Gross Yields to projected Net Yields, (iii) projected Gross Cruise Costs to projected Net Cruise Costs and projected Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel and (iv) projected Net Income and Earnings per Share to projected Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Earnings per Share because preparation of meaningful GAAP projections of Total revenues, Gross Yields, Gross Cruise Costs, Net Income and Earnings per Share would require unreasonable effort. Due to significant uncertainty, we are unable to predict, without unreasonable effort, the future movement of foreign exchange rates, fuel prices and interest rates inclusive of our related hedging programs. In addition, we are unable to determine the future impact of restructuring expenses or other non-core business related gains and losses which may result from strategic initiatives. These items are uncertain and could be material to our results of operations in accordance with GAAP. Due to this uncertainty, we do not believe that reconciling information for such projected figures would be meaningful.

Results of Operations

Summary

~~Our~~Both our net income and Adjusted Net Income for the third quarter of ~~2016 was~~2017 were $752.8 million, or $3.49 per share on a diluted basis compared to net income and Adjusted Net Income of $693.3 million and $690.9 million, or $3.21 and $3.20 ~~per share on a diluted basis, respectively, as compared to net income and Adjusted Net Income of $228.8 million and $628.1 million, or $1.03 and $2.84~~ per share on a diluted basis, respectively, for the third quarter of ~~2015.~~2016.

~~Our~~Both our net income and Adjusted Net Income for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016 was~~2017 were $1.3 billion, or $6.19 per share on a diluted basis as compared to net income and Adjusted Net Income of $1.0 billion and $1.1 billion, or $4.72 and $4.85, per share on a diluted basis, respectively, ~~as compared to net income and Adjusted Net Income of $459.0 million and $858.3 million, or $2.08 and $3.88 per share on a diluted basis, respectively,~~ for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015.~~2016.

Significant items for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 include:

The estimated negative impact resulting from third quarter 2017 hurricane-related disruptions was approximately $0.20 per share on a diluted basis to our net income and Adjusted Net Income for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2017.

The effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to our passenger ticket and onboard and other revenue transactions denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar, resulted in an increase in total revenues of $14.8 million for the quarter and a decrease of $16.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2016.

Total revenues, excluding the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates, decreased $9.0 million and increased $203.2 million for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2016. The decrease during the quarter was due to the decrease in capacity, including the hurricane-related disruptions during the third quarter of 2017, and the increase during the nine months was primarily due to an increase in ticket prices and onboard spending on a per passenger basis, which are further discussed below.

Total cruise operating expenses decreased $21.9 million and $141.4 million for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2016. The decreases were primarily due to the decrease in capacity, which is further discussed below. Additionally, we recognized a $30.9 million gain on the sale of Legend of the Seas in March 2017.

The effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to our cruise operating expenses, denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar, ~~resulted in a decrease~~was immaterial to ~~total revenues~~our consolidated statements of ~~$58.8 million and $154.3 million~~comprehensive income (loss) for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, ~~2016, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2015, and a decrease to cruise operating expenses~~2017.

Table of ~~$10.2 million and $34.2 million for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2015;~~Contents

Total revenues, excluding the unfavorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates, increased $99.5 million and $344.0 million for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to the same periods in 2015. The increases were primarily due to increases in capacity, which are further discussed below.

Total Cruise operating expenses, excluding the favorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates, decreased $36.7 million and increased $0.4 million for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2015. The decrease during the quarter was primarily due to a decrease in fuel expense and the increase during the nine months was primarily due to the increase in capacity, which are further discussed below.Other Items

~~Effective January 1, 2016, we eliminated RCHE's, the parent company~~In May 2017, TUI Cruises, our 50% joint venture, took delivery of the Pullmantur and CDF brands, two-month reporting lag to be consistent with the fiscal calendar of the Company. As a result of this change, the results of RCHE for November and December 2015 are included in our statement of comprehensive income (loss) for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The effect of this change was a decrease to net income of $21.7 million and this amount is reported within ~~Other income~~Mein Schiff 6 ~~in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. Refer to Note 1.~~ ~~Financial Statements~~ ~~to our consolidated financial statements for further information on the elimination of the Pullmantur reporting lag.~~.

During the second quarter of 2017, we entered into agreements with Meyer Turku to build two "Project Icon" ships. In ~~July 2016,~~October 2017, we ~~sold 51%~~entered into credit agreements for the unsecured financing of ~~our interest in RCHE. We retained a 49% interest in~~ these ~~businesses as well as full ownership~~ships for up to 80% of the vessels and aircraft. As a result of the sale of a majority interest in these businesses, we recognized an immaterial gain and no longer consolidate these businesses in our consolidated financial statements effective August 2016.each ship's contract price. Refer to Note 1.7. ~~General~~Commitments and Contingencies to our consolidated financial statements for further information.

~~Other Items~~

~~In April 2016, we took delivery~~During the third quarter of ~~Ovation of the Seas. To finance the purchase, we borrowed $841.8 million under a previously committed 12-year unsecured term loan, which is 95% guaranteed by Hermes. Refer to Note 6.~~ ~~Long-Term Debt~~ ~~to our consolidated financial statements for further information.~~

~~In May 2016, we took delivery of~~ ~~Harmony of the Seas~~. To finance the purchase, we borrowed €700.7 million, or $787.2 million based on the exchange rate at September 30, 2016, and $226.1 million under previously committed unsecured term loans. Both of the facilities are 100% guaranteed by COFACE. Refer to Note 6. ~~Long-Term Debt~~ ~~to our consolidated financial statements for further information.~~

~~In May 2016, TUI Cruises, our 50% joint venture, took delivery of~~ ~~Mein Schiff 5~~.

~~In June 2016,~~2017, we entered into an agreement to ~~sell~~purchase a ship ~~to Thomson Cruises.~~for our Azamara Club Cruises brand. The sale is ~~scheduled~~expected to be completed inwith the delivery of the ship scheduled for March 2017 in order to retain the future revenues to be generated for sailings through that date. We expect to recognize a gain on the sale, which we do not expect will have a material effect to our annual consolidated financial statements.2018.

Table of Contents

Operating results for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 compared to the same period in ~~2015~~2016 are shown in the following table (in thousands, except per share data):


	Quarter Ended September 30,										Nine months ended September 30,										Quarter Ended September 30,										Nine months ended September 30,
	2016					2015					2016					2015					2017					2016					2017					2016
				% of Total Revenues					% of Total Revenues					% of Total Revenues					% of Total Revenues					% of Total Revenues					% of Total Revenues					% of Total Revenues					% of Total Revenues
Passenger ticket revenues	$	1,899,956		74.1	%	$	1,873,942		74.3	%	$	4,794,653		72.8	%	$	4,688,189		73.3	%	$	1,893,152		73.7	%	$	1,899,956		74.1	%	$	4,892,760		72.2	%	$	4,794,653		72.8	%
Onboard and other revenues	663,785			25.9	%	649,158			25.7	%	1,792,145			27.2	%	1,708,832			26.7	%	676,392			26.3	%	663,785			25.9	%	1,880,618			27.8	%	1,792,145			27.2	%
Total revenues	2,563,741			100.0	%	2,523,100			100.0	%	6,586,798			100.0	%	6,397,021			100.0	%	2,569,544			100.0	%	2,563,741			100.0	%	6,773,378			100.0	%	6,586,798			100.0	%
Cruise operating expenses:
Commissions, transportation and other	400,933			15.6	%	413,156			16.4	%	1,060,391			16.1	%	1,093,409			17.1	%	409,597			15.9	%	400,933			15.6	%	1,060,176			15.7	%	1,060,391			16.1	%
Onboard and other	159,887			6.2	%	175,214			6.9	%	399,739			6.1	%	438,558			6.9	%	157,041			6.1	%	159,887			6.2	%	395,472			5.8	%	399,739			6.1	%
Payroll and related	214,081			8.4	%	217,627			8.6	%	671,955			10.2	%	647,788			10.1	%	210,764			8.2	%	214,081			8.4	%	636,861			9.4	%	671,955			10.2	%
Food	125,732			4.9	%	122,124			4.8	%	371,759			5.6	%	361,317			5.6	%	126,223			4.9	%	125,732			4.9	%	369,198			5.5	%	371,759			5.6	%
Fuel	178,772			7.0	%	199,848			7.9	%	531,283			8.1	%	607,689			9.5	%	160,752			6.3	%	178,772			7.0	%	508,914			7.5	%	531,283			8.1	%
Other operating	260,718			10.2	%	259,057			10.3	%	857,161			13.0	%	777,291			12.2	%	253,892			9.9	%	260,718			10.2	%	780,257			11.5	%	857,161			13.0	%
Total cruise operating expenses	1,340,123			52.3	%	1,387,026			55.0	%	3,892,288			59.1	%	3,926,052			61.4	%	1,318,269			51.3	%	1,340,123			52.3	%	3,750,878			55.4	%	3,892,288			59.1	%
Marketing, selling and administrative expenses	257,430			10.0	%	256,060			10.1	%	845,808			12.8	%	817,040			12.8	%	273,637			10.6	%	259,327			10.1	%	874,957			12.9	%	852,435			12.9	%
Depreciation and amortization expenses	229,328			8.9	%	210,742			8.4	%	661,712			10.0	%	617,678			9.7	%	240,150			9.3	%	229,328			8.9	%	710,836			10.5	%	661,712			10.0	%
Impairment of Pullmantur related assets	—			—	%	411,267			16.3	%	—			—	%	411,267			6.4	%
Restructuring charges	1,897			0.1	%	—			—		6,627			0.1	%	—			—
Operating Income	734,963			28.7	%	258,005			10.2	%	1,180,363			17.9	%	624,984			9.8	%	737,488			28.7	%	734,963			28.7	%	1,436,707			21.2	%	1,180,363			17.9	%
Other income (expense):
Interest income	6,472			0.3	%	1,735			0.1	%	14,875			0.2	%	8,244			0.1	%	4,693			0.2	%	6,472			0.3	%	16,756			0.2	%	14,875			0.2	%
Interest expense, net of interest capitalized	(82,610		)	(3.2	)%	(66,819		)	(2.6	)%	(226,803		)	(3.4	)%	(213,598		)	(3.3	)%	(73,233		)	(2.9	)%	(82,610		)	(3.2	)%	(230,182		)	(3.4	)%	(226,803		)	(3.4	)%
Other income	34,432			1.3	%	35,866			1.4	%	53,867			0.8	%	39,354			0.6	%
Equity investment income																					85,120			3.3	%	46,539			1.8	%	120,359			1.8		94,832			1.4	%
Other expense																					(1,226		)	—	%	(12,107		)	(0.5	)%	(6,546		)	(0.1	)%	(40,965		)	(0.6	)%
	(41,706		)	(1.6	)%	(29,218		)	(1.2	)%	(158,061		)	(2.4	)%	(166,000		)	(2.6	)%	15,354			0.6	%	(41,706		)	(1.6	)%	(99,613		)	(1.5	)%	(158,061		)	(2.4	)%
Net Income	$	693,257		27.0	%	$	228,787		9.1	%	$	1,022,302		15.5	%	$	458,984		7.2	%	$	752,842		29.3	%	$	693,257		27.0	%	$	1,337,094		19.7	%	$	1,022,302		15.5	%
Diluted Earnings per Share	$	3.21				$	1.03				$	4.72				$	2.08				$	3.49				$	3.21				$	6.19				$	4.72

Table of Contents

Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Earnings per Share were calculated as follows (in thousands, except per share data):

Quarter Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
2016 2015 2016 2015
Net Income $ 693,257
$ 228,787
$ 1,022,302
$ 458,984
Adjusted Net income 690,911
628,070
1,050,031
858,267
Net Adjustments to Net Income- (Decrease) Increase $ (2,346 ) $ 399,283
$ 27,729
$ 399,283
Adjustments to Net Income:
Impairment of Pullmantur related assets⁽¹⁾
$ —
$ 399,283
$ —
$ 399,283
Net loss related to the elimination of the Pullmantur reporting lag —
—
21,656
—
Net gain related to the sale of the Pullmantur and CDF Croisières de France brands (3,834 ) —
(3,834 ) —
Restructuring charges 1,897
—
6,627
—
Other initiative costs (409 ) —
3,280
—
Net Adjustments to Net Income- (Decrease) Increase $ (2,346 ) $ 399,283
$ 27,729
$ 399,283

Basic:

   Earnings per Share $ 3.23
$ 1.04
$ 4.74
$ 2.09
   Adjusted Earnings per Share $ 3.22
$ 2.86
$ 4.87
$ 3.90

Diluted:
   Earnings per Share $ 3.21
$ 1.03
$ 4.72
$ 2.08
   Adjusted Earnings per Share $ 3.20
$ 2.84
$ 4.85
$ 3.88

Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding:
Basic 214,819
219,963
215,663
219,835
Diluted 215,667
221,137
216,575
220,979

⁽¹⁾ ~~Includes a net income tax benefit of $12.0 million related to the Pullmantur impairment.~~



	Quarter Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016			2017		2016
Net Income	$	752,842	$	693,257		$	1,337,094	$	1,022,302
Adjusted Net income	752,842		690,911			1,337,094		1,050,031
Net Adjustments to Net Income- (Decrease) Increase	$	—	$	(2,346	)	$	—	$	27,729
Adjustments to Net Income:
Net loss related to the elimination of the Pullmantur reporting lag	$	—	$	—		—		21,656
Net gain related to the sale of the Pullmantur and CDF Croisières de France brands	—		(3,834		)	—		(3,834		)
Restructuring charges	—		1,897			—		6,627
Other initiative costs	—		(409		)	—		3,280
Net Adjustments to Net Income- (Decrease) Increase	$	—	$	(2,346	)	$	—	$	27,729

Basic:
Earnings per Share	$	3.51	$	3.23		$	6.22	$	4.74
Adjusted Earnings per Share	$	3.51	$	3.22		$	6.22	$	4.87

Diluted:
Earnings per Share	$	3.49	$	3.21		$	6.19	$	4.72
Adjusted Earnings per Share	$	3.49	$	3.20		$	6.19	$	4.85

Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding:
Basic	214,694		214,819			214,882		215,663
Diluted	215,824		215,667			215,905		216,575

Selected statistical information is shown in the following table:


	Quarter Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,				Quarter Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016		2015		2016⁽¹⁾		2015		2017		2016		2017		2016⁽¹⁾
Passengers Carried	1,558,224		1,403,650		4,365,144		4,053,451		1,512,363		1,558,224		4,371,235		4,365,144
Passenger Cruise Days	10,727,918		10,176,750		30,367,048		28,856,742		10,189,900		10,727,918		30,100,035		30,367,048
APCD	9,766,482		9,465,368		28,503,681		27,284,750		9,214,470		9,766,482		27,646,779		28,503,681
Occupancy	109.8	%	107.5	%	106.5	%	105.8	%	110.6	%	109.8	%	108.9	%	106.5	%

⁽¹⁾ Does not include November and December 2015 amounts ~~related to~~for Pullmantur as the net Pullmantur result for those months was included within Other expense in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, as a result of the elimination of the Pullmantur reporting ~~lag.~~lag, and did not affect Gross Yields, Net Yields, Gross Cruise Costs, Net Cruise Costs and Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel.

Table of Contents

Gross Yields and Net Yields were calculated as follows (in thousands, except APCD and Yields):


	Quarter Ended September 30,								Nine Months Ended September 30,								Quarter Ended September 30,							Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016			2016 On a Constant Currency Basis			2015		2016			2016 On a Constant Currency Basis			2015		2017		2017 On a Constant Currency Basis		2016			2017		2017 On a Constant Currency Basis		2016
Passenger ticket revenues	$	1,899,956		$	1,952,378		$	1,873,942	$	4,794,653		$	4,934,937		$	4,688,189	$	1,893,152	$	1,880,360	$	1,899,956		$	4,892,760	$	4,907,927	$	4,794,653
Onboard and other revenues	663,785			670,195			649,158		1,792,145			1,806,124			1,708,832		676,392		674,382		663,785			1,880,618		1,882,049		1,792,145
Total revenues	2,563,741			2,622,573			2,523,100		6,586,798			6,741,061			6,397,021		2,569,544		2,554,742		2,563,741			6,773,378		6,789,976		6,586,798
Less:
Commissions, transportation and other	400,933			410,399			413,156		1,060,391			1,086,888			1,093,409		409,597		406,500		400,933			1,060,176		1,062,632		1,060,391
Onboard and other	159,887			160,036			175,214		399,739			401,285			438,558		157,041		155,818		159,887			395,472		394,316		399,739
Net Revenues including other initiative costs	2,002,921			2,052,138			1,934,730		5,126,668			5,252,888			4,865,054		2,002,906		1,992,424		2,002,921			5,317,730		5,333,028		5,126,668
Less:
Other initiative costs included within Net Revenues	(1,843		)	(1,790		)	—		(1,843		)	(1,790		)	—		—		—		(1,843		)	—		—		(1,843		)
Net Revenues	$	2,004,764		$	2,053,928		$	1,934,730	$	5,128,511		$	5,254,678		$	4,865,054	$	2,002,906	$	1,992,424	$	2,004,764		$	5,317,730	$	5,333,028	$	5,128,511

APCD	9,766,482			9,766,482			9,465,368		28,503,681			28,503,681			27,284,750		9,214,470		9,214,470		9,766,482			27,646,779		27,646,779		28,503,681
Gross Yields	$	262.50		$	268.53		$	266.56	$	231.09		$	236.50		$	234.45	$	278.86	$	277.25	$	262.50		$	245.00	$	245.60	$	231.09
Net Yields	$	205.27		$	210.30		$	204.40	$	179.92		$	184.35		$	178.31	$	217.37	$	216.23	$	205.27		$	192.35	$	192.90	$	179.92

Table of Contents

Gross Cruise Costs, Net Cruise Costs and Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel were calculated as follows (in thousands, except APCD and costs per APCD):


	Quarter Ended September 30,								Nine Months Ended September 30,								Quarter Ended September 30,							Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016			2016 On a Constant Currency Basis			2015		2016			2016 On a Constant Currency Basis			2015		2017		2017 On a Constant Currency Basis		2016			2017		2017 On a Constant Currency Basis		2016
Total cruise operating expenses	$	1,340,123		$	1,350,295		$	1,387,026	$	3,892,288		$	3,926,447		$	3,926,052	$	1,318,269	$	1,311,964	$	1,340,123		$	3,750,878	$	3,753,441	$	3,892,288
Marketing, selling and administrative expenses(1)	257,430			260,471			256,060		845,808			856,941			817,040		273,637		273,121		257,430			874,957		881,067		845,808
Gross Cruise Costs	1,597,553			1,610,766			1,643,086		4,738,096			4,783,388			4,743,092		1,591,906		1,585,085		1,597,553			4,625,835		4,634,508		4,738,096
Less:
Commissions, transportation and other	400,933			410,399			413,156		1,060,391			1,086,888			1,093,409		409,597		406,500		400,933			1,060,176		1,062,632		1,060,391
Onboard and other	159,887			160,036			175,214		399,739			401,285			438,558		157,041		155,818		159,887			395,472		394,316		399,739
Net Cruise Costs including other initiative costs	1,036,733			1,040,331			1,054,716		3,277,966			3,295,215			3,211,125		1,025,268		1,022,767		1,036,733			3,170,187		3,177,560		3,277,966
Less:
Net gain related to the sale of Pullmantur and CDF Croisières de France brands included within other operating expenses																	—		—		(3,834		)	—		—		(3,834		)
Other initiative costs included within cruise operating expenses and marketing, selling and administrative expenses	(2,252		)	(2,157		)	—		1,073			1,240			—		—		—		(2,252		)	—		—		1,073
Net gain related to the sale of Pullmantur and CDF Croisières de France brands included within other operating expenses	(3,834		)	(3,834		)	—		(3,834		)	(3,834		)	—
Net Cruise Costs	1,042,819			1,046,322			1,054,716		3,280,727			3,297,809			3,211,125		1,025,268		1,022,767		1,042,819			3,170,187		3,177,560		3,280,727
Less:
Fuel⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾	178,772			178,742			199,848		530,859			531,836			607,689		160,752		160,751		178,772			508,914		508,911		530,859
Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel	$	864,047		$	867,580		$	854,868	$	2,749,868		$	2,765,973		$	2,603,436	$	864,516	$	862,016	$	864,047		$	2,661,273	$	2,668,649	$	2,749,868

APCD	9,766,482			9,766,482			9,465,368		28,503,681			28,503,681			27,284,750		9,214,470		9,214,470		9,766,482			27,646,779		27,646,779		28,503,681
Gross Cruise Costs per APCD	$	163.58		$	164.93		$	173.59	$	166.23		$	167.82		$	173.84	$	172.76	$	172.02	$	163.58		$	167.32	$	167.63	$	166.23
Net Cruise Cost per APCD	$	106.78		$	107.13		$	111.43	$	115.10		$	115.70		$	117.69
Net Cruise Costs per APCD																	$	111.27	$	111.00	$	106.78		$	114.67	$	114.93	$	115.10
Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel per APCD	$	88.47		$	88.83		$	90.32	$	96.47		$	97.04		$	95.42	$	93.82	$	93.55	$	88.47		$	96.26	$	96.53	$	96.47

⁽¹⁾ For the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2016, amounts do not include restructuring charges of $1.9 million and $6.6 million, respectively.

⁽²⁾ For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, amount does not include fuel expense of $0.4 million included within other initiative costs associated with the redeployment of Pullmantur’s Empress to the Royal Caribbean International brand.

Table of Contents

~~2016~~2017 Outlook

The ~~company~~Company does not make predictions about fuel pricing, interest rates or currency exchange rates but does provide guidance about its future business activities. On ~~October 28, 2016,~~November 7, 2017, we announced the following full year and fourth quarter ~~and full year 2016~~2017 guidance based on the then current fuel pricing, interest rates and currency exchange rates:

Full Year ~~2016~~2017



	~~As Reported~~	~~Constant Currency~~
~~Net Yields~~	~~1.7% to 2.0%~~	~~4.0% or better~~
~~Net Cruise Costs per APCD~~	~~Approx. (2.0%)~~	~~Approx. (1.5%)~~
~~Net Cruise Costs per APCD, Excluding Fuel~~	~~Approx. 0.5%~~	~~Approx. 1.0%~~
~~Capacity Increase~~	~~3.3%~~
~~Depreciation and Amortization~~	~~$890 to $900 million~~
~~Interest Expense, net~~	~~$287 to $292 million~~
~~Fuel Consumption (metric tons)~~	~~1,371,000~~
~~Fuel Expenses~~	~~$720 million~~
~~Percent Hedged (fwd consumption)~~	~~68%~~
~~Impact of 10% change in fuel prices~~	~~$4 million~~
~~1% Change in Currency~~	~~$4 million~~
~~1% Change in Net Yield~~	~~$15 million~~
~~1% Change in NCC x Fuel~~	~~$8 million~~
~~1% Change in LIBOR~~	~~$12 million~~
~~Adjusted Earnings per Share-Diluted~~	~~$6.00 to $6.10~~

~~Fourth Quarter 2016~~



	As Reported	Constant Currency
Net Yields	Approx. ~~4.5%~~6.0%	Approx. 6.0%
Net Cruise Costs per APCD	1.0% to 1.5%	Approx. ~~(1.5%)~~	~~(1.0%) to (1.5%)~~1.5%
Net Cruise Costs per APCD, Excluding Fuel	Approx. ~~(2.0%)~~2.0%	Approx. ~~(1.5%)~~2.0%
Capacity ~~Increase~~Decrease	~~(0.2%~~(2.4%)
Depreciation and Amortization	~~$230 to $235~~Approx. $950 million
Interest Expense, net	~~$75 to $80~~Approx. $280 million
Fuel Consumption (metric tons)	~~340,000~~1,315,800
Fuel Expenses	$~~189~~686 million
Percent Hedged (fwd consumption)	~~68%~~65%
Impact of 10% change in fuel prices	$47 million
1% Change in Currency	$4 million
1% Change in Net Yield	$1516 million
1% Change in NCC xex Fuel	$89 million
1% Change in LIBOR	$126 million
Adjusted Earnings per Share-Diluted	$7.35 to $7.40

Fourth Quarter 2017



	As Reported	Constant Currency
Net Yields	Approx. 3.5%	2.0% to 2.5%
Net Cruise Costs per APCD	Approx. 7.0%	Approx. 6.5%
Net Cruise Costs per APCD, Excluding Fuel	Approx. 9.0%	Approx. 8.5%
Capacity Decrease	(0.6%)
Depreciation and Amortization	Approx. $240 million
Interest Expense, net	Approx. $65 million
Fuel Consumption (metric tons)	334,800
Fuel Expenses	$177 million
Percent Hedged (fwd consumption)	65%
Impact of 10% change in fuel prices	$7 million
1% Change in Currency	$4 million
1% Change in Net Yield	$16 million
1% Change in NCC ex Fuel	$9 million
1% Change in LIBOR	$6 million
Adjusted Earnings per Share-Diluted	$1.15 to $1.20

~~Adjusted Earnings per Share estimates for the Full Year and Fourth Quarter~~

Table of 2016 are presented in lieu of US GAAP earnings per share estimates due to uncertainty in projecting the amounts adjusted to arrive at this measure, such as uncertainty in the amount and timing of restructuring charges and other initiative costs that we will absorb in the remainder of 2016, the amount of which is expected to be immaterial. Refer to Note 11. ~~Restructuring Charges~~ in our consolidated financial statements under Item 1. Financial Statements for further information on our restructuring charges and other initiative costs and to the definition for Adjusted Earnings per Share herein. For the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2016, we incurred restructuring charges and other initiative costs of $1.5 million and $9.9 million, respectively.Contents

Volatility in foreign currency exchange rates affects the US dollar value of our earnings. Based on our highest net exposure for each quarter and the full year ~~2016,~~2017, the top five foreign currencies are ranked below. For example, the Australian Dollar is the

~~Table of Contents~~

most impactful currency in the first and fourth quarters of ~~2016.~~2017. The first, second and third quarters of ~~2016~~2017 rankings are based on actual results. Rankings for the fourth quarter and full year are based on estimated net exposures.



Ranking	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	FY ~~2016~~2017
1	AUD	GBP	GBP	AUD	GBP
2	CAD	~~AUD~~CNH	CNH	GBP	AUD
3	GBP	~~CAD~~AUD	EUR	CAD	CAD
4	CNH	~~CNH~~CAD	CAD	EUR	CNH
5	BRL	MXN	~~AUD~~MXN	CNH	EUR

The currency abbreviations above are defined as follows:



Currency Abbreviation		Currency
AUD		Australian Dollar
BRL		Brazilian Real
CAD		Canadian Dollar
CNH		Chinese Yuan
EUR		Euro
GBP		British Pound
MXN		Mexican Peso

Quarter Ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 Compared to Quarter Ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016

In this section, references to 2017 refer to the quarter ended September 30, 2017 and references to 2016 refer to the quarter ended September 30, ~~2016 and references to 2015 refer to the quarter ended September 30, 2015.~~2016.

Revenues

Total revenues for ~~2016~~2017 increased ~~$40.6~~$5.8 million, or ~~1.6%~~0.2%, from ~~2015.~~2016.

Passenger ticket revenues comprised ~~74.1%~~73.7% of our 2017 total revenues and decreased by $6.8 million, or 0.4%, from 2016. The decrease was primarily driven by a 5.7% decrease in capacity, which decreased passenger ticket revenues by $107.4 million primarily due to the sale of our majority interest in Pullmantur Holdings during the third quarter of 2016, and to a lesser extent, the sale of Legend of the Seas in the first quarter of 2017, as well as the impact of canceled sailings resulting from hurricane-related disruptions during the third quarter of 2017.

The decrease was partially offset by:

an $88.0 million increase in ticket prices driven by the improvement in our ticket price on a per passenger basis due to the exit of the Pullmantur ships, as well as higher pricing on North America and Europe sailings. The increase in ticket prices was partially offset by lower pricing on Asia/Pacific sailings; and

a favorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to our revenue transactions denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar of approximately $12.8 million.

The remaining 26.3% of 2017 total revenues was comprised of onboard and other revenues, which increased $12.6 million, or 1.9%, to $676.4 million in 2017 from $663.8 million in 2016. The increase in onboard and other revenues was primarily due to:

a $30.7 million increase in onboard revenue attributable to higher spending on a per passenger basis due to our revenue enhancing initiatives, including beverage package sales and promotions, new strategies and promotion on specialty restaurants and the increased revenue associated with internet and other telecommunication services. The increase is also attributable to port activities mainly due to itinerary changes; and

Table of Contents

a $13.8 million increase in other revenue primarily due to charter revenue and management fees earned from Pullmantur Holdings.

The increase was partially offset by a $36.8 million decrease attributable to the 5.7% decrease in capacity noted above, including the impact of canceled sailings resulting from hurricane-related disruptions during the third quarter of 2017.

Onboard and other revenues included concession revenues of $87.3 million in 2017 and $86.6 million in 2016.

Cruise Operating Expenses

Total cruise operating expenses for 2017 decreased $21.9 million, or 1.6%, from 2016. The decrease was primarily due to a $75.5 million decrease attributable to the 5.7% decrease in capacity noted above.

The decrease was partially offset by:

a $14.6 million increase in commissions expense mainly due to the increase in ticket prices discussed above and changes in commission incentives;

a $10.2 million increase in head taxes due to itinerary changes;

a $9.6 million increase in other operating expenses primarily due to an immaterial gain recognized in 2016 as a result of the sale of our majority interest in Pullmantur Holdings; and

an $8.7 million increase in payroll and related expenses due to an increase in crew benefits.

Marketing, Selling and Administrative Expenses

Marketing, selling and administrative expenses for 2017 increased $14.3 million, or 5.5%, to $273.6 million from $259.3 million in 2016. The increase was primarily due to an increase in payroll and benefits driven by higher stock prices year over year related to our performance share awards, partially offset by a decrease in expenses due to the sale of our majority interest in Pullmantur Holdings.

Depreciation and Amortization Expenses

Depreciation and amortization expenses for 2017 increased $10.8 million, or 4.7%, to $240.2 million from $229.3 million in 2016. The increase was primarily due to new shipboard additions associated with our ship upgrade projects and to a lesser extent, additions related to shoreside projects, partially offset by the decrease in depreciation associated with the sale of Legend of the Seas in the first quarter of 2017.

Other Income (Expense)

Interest expense, net of interest capitalized for 2017decreased $9.4 million, or 11.4%, to $73.2 million from $82.6 million in 2016. The decrease was primarily due to a lower average debt in 2017 compared to 2016, partially offset by higher interest rates in 2017 compared to 2016.

Equity investment income increased $38.6 million, or 82.9%, to $85.1 million in 2017 from $46.5 million in 2016 primarily due to an increase in income from TUI Cruises.

Other expense decreased $10.9 million, or 89.9%, to $1.2 million in 2017 from $12.1 million in 2016 primarily due to fuel hedge ineffectiveness gains in 2017 compared to losses in 2016 and a decrease in foreign exchange losses in 2017, net of hedges.

Gross and Net Yields

Gross Yields and Net Yields increased 6.2% and 5.9% in 2017, respectively, compared to 2016 primarily due to the increase in passenger ticket and onboard and other revenues discussed above. Gross Yields and Net Yields, on a Constant Currency basis, increased 5.6% and 5.3% in 2017, respectively, compared to 2016.

Gross and Net Cruise Costs

Table of Contents

Gross Cruise Costs in 2017 was consistent with 2016 and Net Cruise Costs decreased 1.7% in 2017 compared to 2016 primarily due to the decrease in capacity discussed above. Gross Cruise Costs per APCD and Net Cruise Costs per APCD increased 5.6% and 4.2% in 2017, respectively, compared to 2016. Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel per APCD increased 6.0% in 2017 compared to 2016. The increases in 2017 were primarily due to the increase in cruise operating expenses discussed above. Additionally, the hurricane-related disruptions during the third quarter of 2017 reduced our capacity; however, certain operating expenses were still incurred, negatively impacting our metrics per APCD.

Other Comprehensive Income

Other comprehensive income in 2017 was $234.1 million compared to $94.5 million in 2016. The increase of $139.6 million, or 147.7%, was primarily due to the Gain on cash flow derivative hedges in 2017 of $230.2 million compared to $95.5 million in 2016. The increase of $134.7 million in 2017 was primarily due to higher foreign currency forward contract and fuel swap instrument values in 2017 compared to 2016, partially offset by lower amounts of fuel swap losses reclassified to income in 2017 .

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016

In this section, references to 2017 refer to the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and references to 2016 refer to the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

Revenues

Total revenues for 2017 increased $186.6 million, or 2.8%, from 2016.

Passenger ticket revenues comprised 72.2% of our 2017 total revenues. Passenger ticket revenues for ~~2016~~2017 increased by ~~$26.0~~$98.1 million, or ~~1.4%~~2.0%, from ~~2015.~~2016, despite the impact of canceled sailings resulting from hurricane-related disruptions during the third quarter of 2017. The increase was primarily due to

•~~a 3.2% increase in capacity, which increased~~ ~~passenger ticket revenues~~ by~~$59.6 million; and~~

an increase of ~~$18.8~~$258.1 million in ticket prices primarily driven by the improvement in our ticket price on a per passenger basis due to the exit of the Pullmantur ships and the addition of Harmony of the Seas andOvation of the Seas, as well as higher pricing on ~~Alaska~~North America and ~~Caribbean~~Europe sailings. The increase in ticket prices on these itineraries was partially offset by lower pricing on Asia/Pacific sailings.

The increase was partially offset by:

a 3.0% decrease in capacity, which decreased passenger ticket revenues by$144.2 million primarily due to the sale of our majority interest in Pullmantur Holdings during the third quarter of 2016, the sale of Splendour of the Seas in the second quarter of 2016 and the sale of Legend of the Seas in first quarter of 2017, which was partially offset by an increase in capacity due to the addition of Ovation of the Seas and Harmony of the Seas into our fleet during the second quarter of 2016; and

an approximate ~~$52.4~~$15.2 million unfavorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to our passenger ticket revenue transactions denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar.

The remaining ~~25.9%~~27.8% of ~~2016~~2017 total revenues was comprised of onboard and other revenues, which increased ~~$14.6~~$88.5 million, or ~~2.3%~~4.9%, ~~to $663.8 million~~ in ~~2016~~2017 from ~~$649.2 million in 2015.~~2016. The increase in onboard and other revenues was primarily due to:

a ~~$19.9 million increase attributable to the 3.2% increase in capacity noted above; and~~

~~an $8.9~~$99.8 million increase in onboard revenue attributable to higher spending on a per passenger basis primarily due to our ~~ship upgrade programs and other~~ revenue enhancing initiatives, including ~~various~~ beverage package sales and promotions, gaming initiatives, ~~the promotion of~~new strategies and promotions on specialty restaurants and the increased revenue associated with internet and other telecommunication ~~services partially offset by a decrease in~~services. The increase is also attributable to port activities ~~revenue~~ mainly due to itinerary ~~changes.~~changes; and

a $39.4 million increase in other revenue primarily due to charter revenue and management fees earned from Pullmantur Holdings.

The increase was partially offset ~~by:~~

~~Table of Contents~~

by a ~~$7.8~~$53.1 million decrease attributable to the 3.0% decrease in ~~other revenues primarily due to our travel agency business that was sold in 2015, which is mostly offset by~~capacity noted above, including the ~~related decrease in travel agency expenses discussed below; and~~

~~an approximate $6.4 million unfavorable effect~~impact of ~~changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to our onboard and other revenue transactions denominated in currencies other than~~canceled sailings resulting from hurricane-related disruptions during the ~~United States dollar.~~third quarter of 2017.

Onboard and other revenues included concession revenues of ~~$86.6~~$244.4 million in ~~2016~~2017 and ~~$98.9~~$240.8 million in ~~2015.~~2016.

Cruise Operating Expenses

Table of Contents

Total cruise operating expenses for ~~2016~~2017 decreased ~~$46.9~~$141.4 million, or ~~3.4%~~3.6%, from ~~2015.~~ 2016.

The decrease was primarily due to:

a ~~$27.5~~$116.6 million decrease attributable to the 3.0% decrease in ~~fuel expense, excluding the impact of the increase in capacity. Our cost of fuel (net of the financial impact of fuel swap agreements) for 2016 decreased 11.3% per metric ton compared to 2015;~~capacity noted above;

a $30.9 million gain resulting from the sale of ~~$10.5 million~~Legend of the Seas ~~decrease~~ in ~~payroll and related expenses primarily due~~2017 compared to ~~changes in our payroll structure;~~

an ~~approximate $10.2 million favorable effect~~immaterial gain from the sale of ~~changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to our cruise operating expenses denominated in currencies other than~~Splendour of the ~~United States dollar;~~

an ~~$8.6 million~~Seas ~~decrease~~ in ~~shore excursion expense attributable to lower contractual costs incurred and the decrease in port activities revenue discussed above;~~

~~a $7.1 million decrease in other expenses primarily related to our travel agency business that was sold in 2015, which mostly offsets the related decrease in travel agency revenues discussed above~~;2016;

a ~~$5.8~~$32.6 million decrease in ~~vessel~~air expense due to itinerary changes and ~~hotel~~lower ticket costs; and

a $23.9 million decrease in vessel maintenance primarily due to the timing of scheduled ~~drydocks; and~~

a ~~$5.8 million~~ ~~decrease in air expense primarily due to the decrease in air transportation sales and lower costs.~~

drydocks.

The net decrease was partially offset by ~~a $43.6~~an increase in commissions expense of $26.0 million ~~increase attributable~~mainly due to the ~~3.2%~~ increase in ~~capacity noted~~ticket prices discussed above.

Marketing, Selling and Administrative Expenses

Marketing, selling and administrative expenses for ~~2016 remained consistent compared~~2017 increased $22.5 million, or 2.6%, to ~~2015.~~$875.0 million from $852.4 million in 2016. The increase was primarily due to an increase in payroll and benefits which was driven by an increase in our stock price year over year related to our performance share awards, partially offset by a decrease in expenses due to the sale of our majority interest in Pullmantur Holdings.

Depreciation and Amortization Expenses

Depreciation and amortization expenses for ~~2016~~2017 increased ~~$18.6~~$49.1 million, or ~~8.8%~~7.4%, to ~~$229.3~~$710.8 million from ~~$210.7~~$661.7 million in ~~2015.~~2016. The increase was primarily due to the addition of Ovation of the Seas andHarmony of the Seas in the second quarter of 2016 into our fleet, and to a lesser extent, new shipboard additions associated with our ship upgrade projects. The increase was partially offset by the decrease in depreciation associated with the sale of Splendour of the Seas in the second quarter of 2016 and the sale of Legend of the Seas in first quarter of 2017.

~~Impairment of Pullmantur related assets~~

During 2015, we recognized an impairment charge of $411.3 million to write down Pullmantur's goodwill to its implied fair value and to write down trademarks and trade names and certain long-lived assets, consisting of three aircraft owned and operated by Pullmantur Air and two ships owned and operated by Pullmantur, to their fair value.

~~Restructuring Charges~~

~~We incurred restructuring charges of $1.9 million during 2016. Refer to Note 11.~~ ~~Restructuring Charges~~ ~~to our consolidated financial statements for further information on our restructuring activities.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

Other Income (Expense)

Interest expense, net of interest capitalized, for ~~2016~~2017 increased ~~$15.8~~$3.4 million, or ~~23.6%~~1.5%, to ~~$82.6~~$230.2 million from ~~$66.8~~$226.8 million in ~~2015.~~2016. The increase was primarily due to ~~a higher average debt level attributable to the financing of~~ ~~Ovation of the Seas~~ ~~and~~ ~~Harmony of the Seas~~ ~~and~~ higher interest rates in ~~2016~~2017 compared to ~~2015.~~2016, partially offset by lower average debt in 2017 compared to 2016.

Equity investment income increased $25.5 million, or 26.9%, to $120.4 million in 2017 from $94.8 million in 2016 primarily due to an increase in income from TUI Cruises, partially offset by losses associated with Pullmantur Holdings in 2017. Effective July 31, 2016, as a result of the sale of 51% of our interest in Pullmantur Holdings, we account for our investment in Pullmantur Holdings under the equity method of accounting.

Other ~~income~~expense ~~in 2016 was~~decreased $34.4 million, ~~compared~~or 84.0%, to ~~$35.9~~$6.5 million in ~~2015. The decrease~~2017 from $41.0 million in ~~income of $1.4 million was~~2016 primarily due to ~~a $12.0~~the 2016 net loss of $21.7 million ~~deferred tax benefit recognized in 2015 due~~related to the ~~impairment~~elimination of the Pullmantur ~~related assets discussed above. The decrease was partially offset by income of $46.5 million from our equity method investments~~reporting lag that did not recur in ~~2016 compared to income of $38.4 million in 2015.~~2017.

Gross and Net Yields

~~Net~~Gross Yields ~~remained consistent compared to 2015.~~and Net Yields increased ~~2.9%~~6.0% and 6.9% in ~~2016~~2017, respectively, compared to ~~2015 on a Constant Currency basis~~2016 primarily due to the increase in passenger ticket and onboard and other revenues discussed above. Gross Yields and Net Yields, on a Constant Currency basis, increased 6.3% and 7.2% in 2017, respectively, compared to 2016.

Gross and Net Cruise Costs

Gross Cruise Costs and Net Cruise Costs decreased ~~1.1%~~2.4% and 3.4% in ~~2016~~2017, respectively compared to ~~2015 and Net Cruise Costs per APCD decreased 4.2% in~~ 2016 ~~compared to 2015~~ primarily due to the decrease in capacity and cruise operating expenses discussed above. In 2017, Gross Cruise Costs per APCD, Net Cruise Costs per APCD ~~on a Constant Currency basis decreased 3.9% in 2016 compared to 2015.~~

~~Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel~~

and Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel ~~per APCD decreased 2.0% in~~were consistent with 2016, ~~compared to 2015~~as reported and ~~decreased 1.6% in 2016 compared to 2015~~ on a Constant Currency basis. The hurricane-related disruptions during the third quarter of 2017 reduced our capacity; however, certain operating expenses were still incurred, negatively impacting our metrics per APCD.

Table of Contents

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Other comprehensive income in ~~2016~~2017 was ~~$94.5~~$389.6 million compared to ~~Other comprehensive loss~~ ~~of $223.4~~$250.9 million in ~~2015.~~2016. The ~~change~~increase of ~~$317.9~~$138.7 million, or 55.3%, was primarily due to the Gain on cash flow derivative hedges in ~~2016~~2017 of ~~$95.5~~$381.7 million compared to ~~the~~ ~~Loss on cash flow derivative hedges~~ of ~~$222.5~~$254.6 million in ~~2015.~~

~~Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015~~

~~In this section, references to 2016 refer to the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and references to 2015 refer to the nine months ended September 30, 2015.~~

~~Revenues~~

~~Total revenues for 2016 increased $189.8~~2016. The increase of $127.1 million ~~or 3.0%, to $6.6 billion from $6.4 billion~~ in ~~2015.~~

~~Passenger ticket revenues~~ ~~comprised 72.8% of our 2016 total revenues. Passenger ticket revenues for 2016 increased by $106.5 million, or 2.3%, from 2015. The increase~~2017 was primarily due ~~to:~~

~~a 4.5% increase~~to higher foreign currency forward contract and interest rate swap instrument values in ~~capacity, which increased~~ ~~passenger ticket revenues by~~ ~~$209.4 million; and~~

~~an increase of $37.3 million in ticket prices primarily driven by~~ ~~Harmony of the Seas, Ovation of the Seas~~ ~~and,~~2017 compared to ~~a lesser extent,~~ ~~Anthem of the Seas,~~ ~~as well as higher pricing on Alaska and Caribbean sailings. The increase in ticket prices was~~2016, partially offset by lower ~~pricing on Mediterranean~~fuel swap instrument values and ~~Asia sailings.~~

~~The increase was partially offset by an approximate $140.3 million unfavorable effect~~lower amounts of ~~changes~~fuel swap losses reclassified to income in ~~foreign currency exchange rates related to our passenger ticket revenue transactions denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar.~~

~~The remaining 27.2% of 2016 total revenues was comprised of~~ 2017.~~onboard and other revenues, which increased $83.3 million, or 4.9%, in 2016 from 2015. The increase in~~ ~~onboard and other revenues~~ ~~was primarily due to:~~

~~a $73.6 million increase attributable to the 4.5% increase in capacity noted above; and~~

~~Table of Contents~~

a $58.7 million increase in onboard revenue attributable to higher spending on a per passenger basis primarily due to our ship upgrade programs and other revenue enhancing initiatives, including various beverage and gaming initiatives, the promotion of specialty restaurants and the increased revenue associated with internet and other telecommunication services partially offset by a decrease in port activities revenue mainly due to itinerary changes.

~~The increase was partially offset by:~~

a $34.0 million decrease in other revenues primarily related to our travel agency business that was sold in 2015, which is mostly offset by the related decrease in travel agency expenses discussed below; and

~~an approximate $14.0 million unfavorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to our onboard and other revenue transactions denominated in currencies other than the US dollar.~~

~~Onboard and other revenues~~ ~~included concession revenues of $240.8 million in 2016 and $245.4 million in 2015.~~

~~Cruise Operating Expenses~~

~~Total cruise operating expenses decreased $33.8 million, or 0.9%. The decrease was primarily due to:~~

a $102.5 million decrease in fuel expense, excluding the impact of the increase in capacity. Our cost of fuel (net of the financial impact of fuel swap agreements) for 2016 decreased 12.6% per metric ton compared to 2015;

~~an approximate $34.2 million favorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to our cruise operating expenses denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar;~~

~~a $26.2 million decrease in other expenses primarily related to our travel agency business that was sold in 2015, which mostly offsets the related decrease in travel agency revenues discussed above;~~

a ~~$17.2 million~~ ~~decrease in shore excursion expense attributable to lower contractual costs incurred and the decrease in port activities revenue discussed above; and~~

~~a $14.8 million decrease in air expense primarily due to the decrease in air transportation sales and lower costs.~~

~~The decrease was mostly offset by a $173.0 million increase attributable to the 4.5% increase in capacity noted above.~~

~~Marketing, Selling and Administrative Expenses~~

~~Marketing, selling and administrative expenses~~ increased $28.8 million, or 3.5%, to $845.8 million from $817.0 million in 2015. The increase was primarily due to an increase in payroll and benefits primarily due to an increase in headcount and merit increases, an increase in advertising spending mainly relating to our initiatives in the North American market and an increase in other initiative costs associated with our restructuring activities. Refer to Note.11 ~~Restructuring Charges~~ ~~to our consolidated financial statements for further information on our restructuring activities.~~

~~Depreciation and Amortization Expenses~~

~~Depreciation and amortization expenses~~ ~~for 2016 increased $44.0 million, or 7.1%, to $661.7 million from $617.7 million in 2015. The increase was primarily due to the addition of~~ ~~Ovation of the Seas and Harmony of the Seas~~ ~~in the second quarter of 2016 into our fleet and the addition of~~ ~~Anthem of the Seas~~ ~~in the second quarter of 2015 and, to a lesser extent, new shipboard additions associated with our ship upgrade projects.~~

~~Impairment of Pullmantur related assets~~

~~Restructuring Charges~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~We incurred restructuring charges of $6.6 million in 2016. Refer to Note 11.~~ ~~Restructuring Charges~~ ~~to our consolidated financial statements for further information on our restructuring activities.~~

~~Other Income~~

~~Interest expense, net of interest capitalized,~~ ~~for 2016increased $13.2 million, or 6.2%, to $226.8 million from $213.6 million in 2015. The increase was due to a higher average debt level attributable to the financing of~~ ~~Ovation of the Seas~~ ~~and~~ ~~Harmony of the Seas, partially offset by lower pricing on debt refinanced in 2015.~~

~~Other income~~ in 2016 was $53.9 million compared to $39.4 million in 2015. The increase in income of $14.5 million was primarily due to income of $94.8 million from our equity method investments in 2016 compared to income of $62.2 million in 2015. The increase in other income was partially offset by the net loss of $21.7 million related to the elimination of the Pullmantur reporting lag.

~~Net Yields~~

Net Yields increased 0.9% in 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to the increase in passenger ticket and onboard and other revenues discussed above. Net Yields increased 3.4% in 2016 compared to 2015 on a Constant Currency basis.

~~Net Cruise Costs~~

Net Cruise Costs increased 2.2% in 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to the increase in capacity, partially offset by the decrease in fuel, which are further discussed above. Net Cruise Costs per APCD decreased 2.2% in 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to the decrease in fuel. Net Cruise Costs per APCD on a Constant Currency basis decreased 1.7% in 2016 compared to 2015.

~~Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel~~

~~Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel per APCD increased 1.1% in 2016 compared to 2015 and increased 1.7% in 2016 compared to 2015 on a Constant Currency basis.~~

~~Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)~~

~~Other comprehensive income~~ ~~in 2016 was $250.9 millioncompared to~~ ~~Other comprehensive loss~~ ~~of $299.4 million in 2015. The change of $550.3 million was primarily due to a~~ ~~Gain on cash flow derivative hedges~~ ~~in 2016 of $254.6 million compared to a~~ ~~Loss on cash flow derivative hedges~~ ~~of $281.0 million in 2015.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

Future Application of Accounting Standards

Refer to Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our consolidated financial statements for further information on Recent Accounting Pronouncements.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Sources and Uses of Cash

Cash flow generated from operations provides us with a significant source of liquidity. Net cash provided by operating activities increased ~~$0.4 billion~~$453.6 million to ~~$2.0~~$2.5 billion for the first nine months in ~~2016~~2017 compared to ~~$1.6~~$2.0 billion for the same period in ~~2015.~~2016. The increase in cash provided by operating activities was primarily attributable to an increase in proceeds from customer deposits ~~and a decrease in fuel costs~~ during the first nine months in ~~2016~~2017 compared to the same period in ~~2015.~~2016. Additionally, dividends received from unconsolidated affiliates increased by ~~$66.0~~$35.9 million.

Net cash used in investing activities ~~increased $1.0~~decreased$2.4 billionto ~~$2.5 billion~~ $78.0 millionfor the first nine months in ~~2016~~2017 compared to ~~$1.5~~$2.5 billion for the same period in ~~2015.~~2016. The ~~increase~~decrease was primarily attributable to ~~an increase~~a decrease in capital expenditures of ~~$953.2 million for the first nine months~~$1.9 billion due to ship deliveries in 2016, ~~compared to the same period in 2015 primarily due to the deliveries of~~ Ovation of the Seas and Harmony of the Seas, compared to no ship deliveries in 2017. In addition, we received $230.0 million of proceeds from the sale of property and equipment in 2017 which did not occur in 2016. ~~Additionally,~~Furthermore, during 2017, we received cash ~~received~~of $57.0 million on ~~loans~~settlements on our foreign currency forward contracts compared to ~~our unconsolidated affiliates decreased $100.2~~cash paid of $172.9 million during 2016.

Net cash used in financing activities was $2.4 billion for the first nine months in 2017 compared to Net cash provided in financing activities of $0.6 billion for the same period in 2016. The change was primarily attributable to a decrease in debt proceeds of $2.4 billion, an increase in debt repayments of $0.8 billion and a higher amount of dividends paid during the first nine months of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016, partially offset by a decrease of stock repurchases of $175.0 million during the first nine months of ~~2016~~2017 compared to the same period in ~~2015.~~

~~Net cash provided by financing activities~~ ~~was $0.6 billion for the first nine months in 2016 compared to~~ ~~net cash used in financing activities~~ of $0.2 billion for the same period in 2015. The increase in cash provided by financing activities was primarily attributable to an increase in debt proceeds of $3.1 billion during the first nine months of 2016, partially offset by an increase in repayment of debt of $1.9 billion, stock repurchases of $0.3 billion that did not occur during the same period in 2015 and an increase in dividends paid of $45.8 million during the first nine months of 2016. The ~~increase~~decrease in debt proceeds was primarily due to the $841.8 million unsecured term loan borrowed in April 2016 to finance Ovation of the Seas and the €700.7 million and $226.1 million unsecured term loans borrowed in May 2016 to finance Harmony of the Seas~~, the $200.0 million unsecured term loan borrowed~~ that did not recur in ~~April 2016~~ 2017and ~~higher~~lower drawings on our revolving credit facilities during the first nine months of ~~2016~~2017 compared to the ~~$742.1 million unsecured term loan borrowed~~same period in ~~April 2015 to finance~~ ~~Anthem of the Seas.~~ ~~The increase in repayment of debt was primarily due to higher payments on our revolving credit facilities.~~2016.

Table of Contents

Future Capital Commitments

Capital Expenditures

As of September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, our ~~brands, including~~Global Brands and our ~~50% joint venture, TUI Cruises, had eight~~Partner Brands have 12 ships on ~~firm~~ order. The expected dates that these ships will enter service and their approximate berths are as follows:



Ship	Expected to Enter Service	Approximate Berths
Royal Caribbean International —
Oasis-class:
Symphony of the Seas	1st Quarter 2018	5,450
Unnamed	2nd Quarter 2021	5,450
Quantum-class:
~~Unnamed~~Spectrum of the Seas	2nd Quarter 2019	4,150
Unnamed	4th Quarter 2020	4,150
~~Oasis-class:~~Project Icon:
Unnamed	2nd Quarter 2022	5,650
Unnamed	2nd Quarter ~~2018~~2024	~~5,450~~5,650
Celebrity Cruises — ~~Project Edge~~Edge-class:
~~Unnamed~~Celebrity Edge	4th Quarter 2018	2,900
~~Unnamed~~Celebrity Beyond	~~1st Half~~2nd Quarter 2020	2,900
Unnamed	4th Quarter 2021	2,900
Unnamed	4th Quarter 2022	2,900
TUI Cruises (50% joint venture)⁽¹⁾—
~~Mein Schiff 6~~	~~2nd Quarter 2017~~	~~2,500~~
Unnamed	2nd Quarter 2018	2,850
Unnamed	~~2nd~~1st Quarter 2019	2,850
	Total Berths	~~27,750~~	47,800


(1)	TUI Cruises plans to offset this additional capacity through the planned transfer of the their first two ships, Mein Schiff 1 and Mein Schiff 2, to an affiliate of TUI AG, our joint venture partner in TUI Cruises, in 2018 and 2019, respectively.

~~In September 2016, we signed conditional agreements with STX France to build a fifth Oasis-class ship expected to be delivered in~~

During the second quarter of ~~2021, and a third and fourth "Project Edge" ship expected to be delivered in the fourth quarter of each of 2021 and 2022. These~~2017, we entered into agreements ~~are contingent upon completion of conditions precedent, including financing.~~

~~Additionally, in October 2016, we signed a memorandum of understanding~~ with Meyer Turku to build two ships of a new generation of ships for Royal Caribbean International, known as ~~"Project Icon", which are expected~~“Project Icon.” Subsequently, in October 2017, we entered into credit agreements for the unsecured financing of these ships for up to ~~enter service in the second quarters~~80% of ~~2022~~each ship's contract price. Refer to Note 7. Commitments and 2024, respectively. While the design is still being finalized, each ship will likely accommodate approximately 5,000 guests. These orders are contingent upon completion of conditions precedent, including documentation and financing.Contingencies to our consolidated financial statements under Item 1. Financial Statements for further information.

Our future capital commitments consist primarily of new ship orders. As of September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the aggregate cost of our ships on ~~firm~~ order, not including the TUI Cruises' ships on order, ~~and those subject to conditions to effectiveness,~~ was approximately ~~$5.3~~$13.0 billion, of which we had deposited ~~$282.0~~$323.2 million as of such date. Approximately ~~56.1%~~53.8% of the aggregate cost was exposed to fluctuations in the Euro exchange rate at September 30, ~~2016.~~2017. Refer to Note 10. Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments to our consolidated financial statements under Item 1. Financial Statements for further information.

In September 2017, we entered into an agreement to purchase a ship for our Azamara Club Cruises brand. The sale is expected to be completed with the delivery of the ship, scheduled for March 2018.

As of September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, we anticipate overall full year capital expenditures, ~~excluding~~not including the ~~above mentioned ship orders subject to conditions to effectiveness and~~ TUI Cruises' ships, ~~on order,~~ will be approximately ~~$2.4 billion for 2016, $0.5~~$0.6 billion for 2017, ~~$2.6~~$3.2 billion for 2018, ~~$1.5~~$2.1 billion for 2019, ~~and $2.0~~$2.5 billion for ~~2020.~~2020 and $2.5 billion for 2021.

Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations

As of September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, our contractual obligations were as follows (in thousands):


	Payments due by period										Payments due by period
			Less than		1-3		3-5		More than				Less than		1-3		3-5		More than
	Total		1 year		years		years		5 years		Total		1 year		years		years		5 years
Operating Activities:
Operating lease obligations⁽¹⁾	$	232,661	$	21,300	$	31,792	$	25,659	$	153,910	$	242,989	$	28,742	$	42,299	$	24,910	$	147,038
Interest on long-term debt⁽²⁾	1,358,964		284,590		433,451		291,739		349,184		1,073,803		233,134		352,304		246,912		241,453
Other⁽³⁾	834,220		172,938		340,044		180,954		140,284		850,768		170,063		297,523		165,395		217,787
Investing Activities:	0										0
Ship purchase obligations⁽⁴⁾	4,063,001		37,944		2,655,244		1,369,813		—		10,692,368		1,658,774		2,751,170		4,230,704		2,051,720
Financing Activities:	0										0
Long-term debt obligations⁽⁵⁾	9,475,483		1,090,558		2,870,327		2,417,486		3,097,112		7,557,801		1,511,773		1,991,501		1,209,893		2,844,634
Capital lease obligations⁽⁶⁾	42,369		7,444		7,614		7,865		19,446		34,406		3,935		7,051		8,272		15,148
Other⁽⁷⁾	60,413		19,676		28,589		11,263		885		33,684		8,525		20,012		5,147		—
Total	$	16,067,111	$	1,634,450	$	6,367,061	$	4,304,779	$	3,760,821	$	20,485,819	$	3,614,946	$	5,461,860	$	5,891,233	$	5,517,780


(1)	We are obligated under noncancelable operating leases primarily for offices, warehouses and motor vehicles. Amounts represent contractual obligations with initial terms in excess of one year.

(2)

Long-term debt obligations mature at various dates through fiscal year 2028 and bear interest at fixed and variable rates. Interest on variable-rate debt is calculated based on forecasted debt balances, including the impact of interest rate swap agreements using the applicable rate at September 30, ~~2016.~~2017. Debt denominated in other currencies is calculated based on the applicable exchange rate at September 30, ~~2016.~~2017.


(3)	Amounts primarily represent future commitments with remaining terms in excess of one year to pay for our usage of certain port facilities, marine consumables, services and maintenance contracts.


(4)	Amounts do not include potential obligations which remain subject to cancellation at our sole discretion. In addition, amounts do not include the conditional agreements with STX France for the fifth Oasis-class ship and the third and fourth "Project Edge" ships and the conditional orders with Meyer Turku for the two "Project Icon" ships.


(5)	Amounts represent debt obligations with initial terms in excess of one year.


(6)	Amounts represent capital lease obligations with initial terms in excess of one year.


(7)	Amounts represent fees payable to sovereign guarantors in connection with certain of our export credit debt facilities and facility fees on our revolving credit facilities.

Please refer to Funding Needs and Sources for discussion on the planned funding of the above contractual obligations.

As a normal part of our business, depending on market conditions, pricing and our overall growth strategy, we continuously consider opportunities to enter into contracts for the building of additional ships. We may also consider the sale of ships or the purchase of existing ships. We continuously consider potential acquisitions and strategic alliances. If any of these were to occur, they would be financed through the incurrence of additional indebtedness, the issuance of additional shares of equity securities or through cash flows from operations.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We and TUI AG have each guaranteed repayment of 50% of a bank loan provided to TUI Cruises which is due 2022. Notwithstanding this, the lenders have agreed to release each shareholder’s guarantee inif certain conditions are met by April 2018. As of September 30, ~~2016, €121.6~~2017, €100.4 million, or approximately ~~$136.6~~$118.7 million based on the exchange rate at September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, remains outstanding. Based on current facts and circumstances, we do not believe potential obligations under this guarantee are probable.

TUI Cruises has entered into various ship construction and credit agreements that include certain restrictions on each of our and TUI AG’s ability to reduce our current ownership interest in TUI Cruises below 37.55% through 2021.

In July 2016, we executed an agreement with Miami Dade County (“MDC”), which was simultaneously assigned to Sumitomo Banking Corporation (“SMBC”), to lease land from MDC and construct a new cruise terminal at PortMiami in Miami, Florida. The terminal is expected to be approximately 170,000 square feet and will serve as a homeport. During the construction period, SMBC will fund the costs of the terminal’s construction and land lease. Upon completion of the terminal's construction, we will

Table of Contents

operate and lease the terminal from SMBC for a five-year term. We determined that the lease arrangement between SMBC and us should be accounted for as an operating lease upon completion of the terminal.

Some of the contracts that we enter into include indemnification provisions that obligate us to make payments to the counterparty if certain events occur. These contingencies generally relate to changes in taxes, increased lender capital costs and other similar costs. The indemnification clauses are often standard contractual terms and are entered into in the normal course of business. There are no stated or notional amounts included in the indemnification clauses and we are not able to estimate the maximum potential amount of future payments, if any, under these indemnification clauses. We have not been required to make any payments under such indemnification clauses in the past and, under current circumstances, we do not believe an indemnification obligation is probable.

As of September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, other than the items described above, we are not party to any other off-balance sheet arrangements, including guarantee contracts, retained or contingent interest, certain derivative instruments and variable interest entities, that either have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future material effect on our financial position.

Funding Needs and Sources

We have significant contractual obligations of which our debt service obligations and the capital expenditures associated with our ship purchases represent our largest funding needs. As of September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, we had approximately ~~$1.6~~$3.6 billion in contractual obligations due through September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, of which approximately ~~$1.1~~$1.5 billion relates to debt maturities, ~~$284.6~~$233.1 million relates to interest on long-term debt and ~~$37.9 million~~$1.7 billion relates to ~~progress~~ship purchase payments, ~~on our ship purchases.~~including the final installment payable due upon delivery of Symphony of the Seas in the first quarter of 2018. We have historically relied on a combination of cash flows provided by operations, drawdowns under our available credit facilities, the incurrence of additional debt and/or the refinancing of our existing debt and the issuance of additional shares of equity securities to fund these obligations.

As of September 30, 2016, we had on firm order two Quantum-class ships and one Oasis-class ship for our Royal Caribbean International brand and our first two "Project Edge" ships for our Celebrity brand, each of which has committed unsecured bank financing arrangements which include sovereign financing guarantees. Refer to Note 7. ~~Commitments and Contingencies~~ ~~to our consolidated financial statements for further information.~~

We had a working capital deficit of ~~$3.7~~$4.3 billion and ~~$3.5~~$3.7 billion as of September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, respectively. Included within our working capital deficit is ~~$1.3~~$1.5 billion and ~~$899.5 million~~$1.3 billion of current portion of long-term debt, including capital leases, as of September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, respectively. Similar to others in our industry, we operate with a substantial working capital deficit. This deficit is mainly attributable to the fact that, under our business model, a vast majority of our passenger ticket receipts are collected in advance of the applicable sailing date. These advance passenger receipts remain a current liability until the sailing date. The cash generated from these advance receipts is used interchangeably with cash on hand from other sources, such as our revolving credit facilities and other cash from operations. The cash received as advanced receipts can be used to fund operating expenses for the applicable future sailing or otherwise, pay down our revolving credit facilities, invest in long term investments or any other use of cash. In addition, we have a relatively low-level of accounts receivable and rapid turnover results in a limited investment in inventories. We generate substantial cash flows from operations and our business model, along with our unsecured revolving credit facilities, has historically allowed us to maintain this working capital deficit and still meet our operating, investing and financing needs. We expect that we will continue to have working capital deficits in the future.

As of September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, we had liquidity of ~~$1.1~~$1.9 billion, consisting of approximately ~~$178.4~~$140.0 million in cash and cash equivalents and ~~$898.0 million~~$1.8 billion available under our unsecured revolving credit facilities.

We anticipate that our cash flows from operations and our current financing arrangements, as described above, will be adequate to meet our capital expenditures and debt repayments over the next twelve-month period.

In ~~October 2015,~~April 2017, Moody's changed our ~~board~~senior unsecured debt credit rating to Baa3 with a stable outlook. Consistent with the provisions of ~~directors authorized a~~our interest rate derivatives instruments, all collateral that was posted with our counterparties as of that date was returned in April 2017.

We have $375.0 million that remains available for future common stock repurchase ~~program for up~~transactions under our Board approved program. Future repurchases may be made at management's discretion from time to ~~$500 million that was completed in August 2016. During~~time on the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2016, we purchased a total of $300.0 million of our common stock through~~ open market or through privately negotiated transactions. ~~Our repurchases~~Repurchases under ~~this~~the program ~~including the $200.0 million of stock repurchased during the fourth quarter of 2015, totaled $500.0 million.~~are expected to be funded from available cash or borrowings under our revolving credit facilities. Refer to Note 8. Shareholders' Equity to our consolidated financial statements for further information.

~~Table of Contents~~

acquisition of greater than 50% of our common stock coupled with a ratings downgrade. If this were to occur, it would have an adverse impact on our liquidity and operations.

Table of Contents

Debt Covenants

Certain of our financing agreements contain covenants that require us, among other things, to maintain minimum net worth of at least ~~$7.1~~$7.9 billion, a fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.25x and limit our net debt-to-capital ratio to no more than 62.5%. The fixed charge coverage ratio is calculated by dividing net cash from operations for the past four quarters by the sum of dividend payments plus scheduled principal debt payments in excess of any new financings for the past four quarters. Our minimum net worth and maximum net debt-to-capital calculations exclude the impact of Accumulated other comprehensive loss on Total shareholders’ equity. We were well in excess of all debt covenant requirements as of September 30, ~~2016.~~2017. The specific covenants and related definitions can be found in the applicable debt agreements, the majority of which have been previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

~~Table of Contents~~

Dividends

In September 2017, we declared a cash dividend on our common stock of $0.60 per share which was paid in October of 2017. During the first and second quarters of 2017, we declared a cash dividend on our common stock of $0.48 per share which was paid in April 2017 and July 2017, respectively. During the first quarter of 2017, we also paid a cash dividend on our common stock of $0.48 per share which was declared during the fourth quarter of 2016.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

For a discussion of our market risks, refer to Part II, Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~2016. There have been no significant developments or material changes since the date of our Annual Report.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e), as of the end of the period covered by this ~~report.~~Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based upon such evaluation, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that those controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and are effective to provide reasonable assurance that such information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC’s rules and forms.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(d) during the quarter ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls

Readers are cautioned that any system of controls, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system will be met. In addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events. Because of these and other inherent limitations of control systems, there is only reasonable assurance that our controls will succeed in achieving their goals under all potential future conditions.

Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

~~There were no~~We are routinely involved in claims typical within the cruise vacation industry. The majority of these claims are covered by insurance. We believe the outcome of such claims, net of expected insurance recoveries, will not have a material ~~developments to the pending legal proceedings reported in~~adverse impact on our ~~Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015~~financial condition or results of operations and ~~our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016. Refer to Note 7.~~ ~~Commitments and Contingencies~~ ~~to our consolidated financial statements for a description of currently pending legal proceedings.~~cash flows.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The risk factors set forth below and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are important factors that could cause actual results to differ from expected or historical results. It is not possible to predict or identify all such risks. There may be additional risks that we consider not to be material, or which are not known, and any of these risks could have the effects set forth below.The ordering of the risk factors set forth below is not intended to reflect any Company indication of priority or likelihood. See Part I, Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for a cautionary note regarding forward-looking statements.

Adverse worldwide economic or other conditions could reduce the demand for cruises and passenger spending, adversely impacting our operating results, cash flows and financial condition including potentially impairing the value of our ships and other assets.

The demand for cruises is affected by international, national and local economic conditions. Weak or uncertain economic conditions impact consumer confidence and pose a risk as vacationers may postpone or reduce discretionary spending. This, in turn, may result in cruise booking slowdowns, decreased cruise prices and lower onboard revenues. Given the global nature of our business, we are exposed to many different economies and our business could be hurt by challenging conditions in any of our markets. Any significant deterioration of global, national or local economic conditions could result in a prolonged period of booking slowdowns, depressed cruise prices and reduced onboard revenues.

Fears of terrorist attacks, war, and other hostilities could have a negative impact on our results of operations.

Events such as terrorist attacks, war (or war-like conditions), conflicts (domestic or cross-border), civil unrest and other hostilities, including an escalation in the frequency or severity of incidents, and the resulting political instability, travel restrictions and advisories, and concerns over safety and security aspects of traveling or the fear of any of the foregoing have had, and could have in the future, a significant adverse impact on demand and pricing in the travel and vacation industry. In view of our global operations, we are susceptible to a wide range of adverse events. These events could also result in additional security measures taken by local authorities which may potentially impact access to ports and/or destinations.

Our operating costs could increase due to market forces and economic or geo-political factors beyond our control.

Our operating costs, including fuel, food, payroll and benefits, airfare, taxes, insurance and security costs are all subject to increases due to market forces and economic or political conditions or other factors beyond our control. Increases in these operating costs could adversely affect our profitability.

Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, fuel prices and interest rates could affect our financial results.

We are exposed to market risk attributable to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, fuel prices and interest rates. Significant changes in any of the foregoing could have a material impact on our financial results, net of the impact of our hedging activities and natural offsets. Our operating results have been and will continue to be impacted, often significantly, by changes in each of these factors. The value of our earnings in foreign currencies is adversely impacted by a strong United States dollar. In addition, any significant increase in fuel prices could materially and adversely affect our business as fuel prices not only impact our fuel costs, but also some of our other expenses, such as crew travel, freight and commodity prices. See “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” for more information.

Conducting business globally may result in increased costs and other risks.

We operate our business globally. Operating internationally exposes us to a number of risks, including increased exposure to a wider range of regional and local economic conditions, volatile local political conditions, potential changes in duties and taxes, including changing and/or uncertain interpretations of existing tax laws and regulations, required compliance with additional laws

Table of Contents

and policies affecting cruising, vacation or maritime businesses or governing the operations of foreign-based companies, currency fluctuations, interest rate movements, difficulties in operating under local business environments, port quality and availability in certain regions, U.S. and global anti-bribery laws or regulations, imposition of trade barriers and restrictions on repatriation of earnings.

Our future growth strategies increasingly depend on the growth and sustained profitability of certain international markets, such as China. Some factors that will be critical to our success in developing these markets may be different than those affecting our more-established North American and European markets. In the Chinese market, in particular, our future success depends on our ability to continue to raise awareness of our products, evolve the available distribution channels and adapt our offerings to best suit the Chinese consumer. China’s economy differs from the economies of other developed countries in many respects and, as the legal and regulatory system in China continues to evolve, there may be greater uncertainty as to the interpretation and enforcement of applicable laws and regulations. In March 2017, China's National Tourism Administration issued a directive to travel agents to halt sales of holiday packages to South Korea. This travel restriction has had a direct impact on our related itineraries impacting the overall performance of our China business. It is uncertain what the ultimate scope and duration of this restriction will be, but to the extent that this or similar sanctions affecting regional travel and/or tourism continues or are put in place, it may impact local demand, available cruise itineraries and the overall financial performance of the China market.

Operating globally also exposes us to numerous and sometimes conflicting legal, regulatory and tax requirements. In many parts of the world, including countries in which we operate, practices in the local business communities might not conform to international business standards. We must adhere to policies designed to promote legal and regulatory compliance as well as applicable laws and regulations. However, we might not be successful in ensuring that our employees, agents, representatives and other third parties with whom we associate throughout the world properly adhere to them. Failure by us, our employees or any of these third parties to adhere to our policies or applicable laws or regulations could result in penalties, sanctions, damage to our reputation and related costs which in turn could negatively affect our results of operations and cash flows.

We have operations in and source passengers from the United Kingdom and other member countries of the European Union. In March 2017, the United Kingdom notified the European Council of its intent to withdraw from the European Union. Since the initial referendum in June 2016, the proposed withdrawal has resulted in increased volatility in the global financial markets and, in particular, in global currency exchange rates. The withdrawal could potentially adversely affect tax, legal and regulatory regimes to which our business in the region is subject. The withdrawal could also, among other potential outcomes, disrupt the free movement of goods, services and people between the United Kingdom and the European Union. Further, uncertainty around these issues could lead to adverse effects on the economy of the United Kingdom and the other economies in which we operate, making it more difficult to source passengers from these regions. These risks may be exacerbated if voters of other countries within the European Union similarly elect to exit the European Union in future referendums.

As a global operator, our business may be also impacted by changes in U.S. policy or priorities in areas such as trade, immigration and/or environmental or labor regulations, among others. Depending on the nature and scope of these changes, they could impact our domestic and international business operations. While still unclear, these changes, and any international response to them, could potentially introduce new barriers to passenger or crew travel and/or cross border transactions, impact our guest experience and/or increase our operating costs.

If we are unable to address these risks adequately, our financial position and results of operations could be adversely affected, including potentially impairing the value of our ships and other assets.

Price increases for commercial airline service for our guests or major changes or reduction in commercial airline service and/or availability could adversely impact the demand for cruises and undermine our ability to provide reasonably priced vacation packages to our guests.

Many of our guests depend on scheduled commercial airline services to transport them to or from the ports where our cruises embark or disembark. Increases in the price of airfare would increase the overall price of the cruise vacation to our guests, which may adversely impact demand for our cruises. In addition, changes in the availability of commercial airline services could adversely affect our guests’ ability to obtain airfare, as well as our ability to fly our guests to or from our cruise ships, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

Incidents or adverse publicity concerning our ships and/or passengers or the cruise vacation industry in general, unusual weather conditions and other natural disasters or disruptions could affect our reputation as well as impact our sales and results of operations.

Table of Contents

The ownership and/or operation of cruise ships, airplanes, private destinations, port facilities and shore excursions involves the risk of accidents, illnesses, mechanical failures, environmental incidents and other incidents which may bring into question safety, health, security and vacation satisfaction which could negatively impact our reputation. Incidents involving cruise ships, and, in particular the safety, health and security of guests and crew and media coverage thereof have impacted and could in the future impact demand for our cruises and pricing in the industry. Our reputation and our business could also be damaged by negative publicity regarding the cruise industry in general, including publicity regarding the spread of contagious disease and the potentially adverse environmental impacts of cruising. The considerable expansion in the use of social media and digital marketing over recent years has compounded the potential scope of any negative publicity. If any such incident or news cycle occurs during a time of high seasonal demand, the effect could disproportionately impact our results of operations for the year. In addition, incidents involving cruise ships may result in additional costs to our business, increasing government or other regulatory oversight and, in the case of incidents involving our ships, potential litigation.

Our cruise ships and port facilities may also be adversely impacted by unusual weather patterns or natural disasters or disruptions, such as hurricanes. We are often forced to alter itineraries and occasionally cancel a cruise or a series of cruises or to redeploy our ships due to these or other factors, which could have an adverse effect on our sales and profitability. For example, the 2017 hurricane season was particularly impactful to our operations in the Caribbean. Increases in the frequency, severity or duration of severe weather events, including those related to climate change, could exacerbate the impact and cause further disruption to our operations. In addition, these and any other events which impact the travel industry more generally may negatively impact our ability to deliver guests or crew to our cruises and/or interrupt our ability to obtain services and goods from key vendors in our supply chain. Any of the foregoing could have an adverse impact on our results of operations and on industry performance.

An increase in capacity worldwide or excess capacity in a particular market could adversely impact our cruise sales and/or pricing.

Although our ships can be redeployed, cruise sales and/or pricing may be impacted by the introduction of new ships into the marketplace, reductions in cruise capacity, overall market growth and deployment decisions of ourselves and our competitors. As of December 31, 2016, a total of 62 new ships with approximately 173,000 berths are on order for delivery through 2021 in the cruise industry. The further net growth in capacity from these new ships and future orders, without an increase in the cruise industry’s demand and/or share of the vacation market, could depress cruise prices and impede our ability to achieve yield improvement.

In addition, to the extent that we or our competitors deploy ships to a particular itinerary and the resulting capacity in that region exceeds the demand, we may lower pricing and profitability may be lower than anticipated. This risk exists in emerging cruise markets, such as China, where capacity has grown rapidly over the past few years and in mature markets where excess capacity is typically redeployed. Any of the foregoing could have an adverse impact on our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition, including potentially impairing the value of our ships and other assets.

Unavailability of ports of call may adversely affect our results of operations.

We believe that port destinations are a major reason why guests choose to go on a particular cruise or on a cruise vacation. The availability of ports is affected by a number of factors, including existing capacity constraints, constraints related to the size of certain ships, security, environmental and health concerns, adverse weather conditions and natural disasters, financial limitations on port development, exclusivity arrangements that ports may have with our competitors, local governmental regulations and local community concerns about port development and other adverse impacts on their communities from additional tourists. In addition, fuel costs may adversely impact the destinations on certain of our itineraries. Any limitations on the availability or feasibility of our ports of call or on the availability of shore excursions and other service providers at such ports could adversely affect our results of operations.

Our reliance on shipyards and their subcontractors to implement our newbuild and ship upgrade programs and to repair and maintain our ships exposes us to risks which, if realized, could adversely impact our business.

We rely on shipyards and their subcontractors to effectively construct our new ships and to repair, maintain and upgrade our existing ships on a timely basis and in a cost effective manner.

There are a limited number of shipyards with the capability and capacity to build our new ships and, accordingly, increased demand for available new construction slots and/or continued consolidation in the cruise shipyard industry (including completion of Italian shipbuilder Fincantieri's bid for STX France) could impact our ability to construct new ships when and as planned, cause us to continue to commit to new ship orders earlier than we have historically done so and/or result in stronger bargaining power

Table of Contents

on the part of the shipyards and the export credit agencies providing financing for the project. Our inability to timely and cost-effectively procure new capacity could have a significant negative impact on our future business plans and results of operations.

Building, repairing, maintaining and/or upgrading a ship is sophisticated work that involves significant risks, and shipyards and/or their subcontractors may encounter financial, technical or design problems when doing these jobs. If materialized, these problems could impact the timely delivery or costs of new ships or the ability of shipyards to repair and upgrade our fleet in accordance with our needs or expectations. In addition, delays or mechanical faults may result in cancellation of cruises or, in more severe situations, new ship orders, or necessitate unscheduled drydocks and repairs of ships. These events and any related adverse publicity could result in lost revenue, increased operating expenses, or both, and thus adversely affect our results of operations.

We may lose business to competitors throughout the vacation market.

We operate in the vacation market and cruising is one of many alternatives for people choosing a vacation. We therefore risk losing business not only to other cruise lines, but also to other vacation operators, which provide other leisure options including hotels, resorts, internet-based alternative lodging sites and package holidays and tours.

We face significant competition from other cruise lines on the basis of cruise pricing, travel agent preference and also in terms of the nature of ships and services we offer to guests. Our principal competitors within the cruise vacation industry include Carnival Corporation & plc, which owns, among others, Aida Cruises, Carnival Cruise Line, Costa Cruises, Cunard Line, Holland America Line, P&O Cruises and Princess Cruises; Disney Cruise Line; MSC Cruises; and Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd, which owns Norwegian Cruise Line, Oceania Cruises and Regent Seven Seas Cruises. Our revenues are sensitive to the actions of other cruise lines in many areas including pricing, scheduling, capacity and promotions, which can have a substantial adverse impact not only on our revenues, but on overall industry revenues.

In the event that we do not effectively market or differentiate our cruise brands from our competitors or otherwise compete effectively with other vacation alternatives and new or existing cruise companies, our results of operations and financial position could be adversely affected.

We may not be able to obtain sufficient financing or capital for our needs or may not be able to do so on terms that are acceptable or consistent with our expectations.

To fund our capital expenditures (including new ship orders), operations and scheduled debt payments, we have historically relied on a combination of cash flows provided by operations, drawdowns under available credit facilities, the incurrence of additional indebtedness and the sale of equity or debt securities in private or public securities markets. Any circumstance or event which leads to a decrease in consumer cruise spending, such as worsening global economic conditions or significant incidents impacting the cruise industry, could negatively affect our operating cash flows. See “-Adverse worldwide economic, geopolitical or other conditions…” and “-Incidents or adverse publicity concerning our ships and/or passengers or the cruise vacation industry…” for more information.

Although we believe we can access sufficient liquidity to fund our operations, investments and obligations as expected, there can be no assurances to that effect. Our ability to access additional funding as and when needed, our ability to timely refinance and/or replace our outstanding debt securities and credit facilities on acceptable terms and our cost of funding will depend upon numerous factors including, but not limited to, the vibrancy of the financial markets, our financial performance, the performance of our industry in general and the size, scope and timing of our financial needs. In addition, even where financing commitments have been secured, significant disruptions in the capital and credit markets could cause our banking and other counterparties to breach their contractual obligations to us. This could include failures of banks or other financial service companies to fund required borrowings under our loan agreements or to pay us amounts that may become due or return collateral that is refundable under our derivative contracts for hedging of fuel prices, interest rates and foreign currencies or other agreements. If any of the foregoing occurs it may have a negative impact on our cash flows, including our ability to meet our obligations, our results of operations and our financial condition.

Our liquidity could be adversely impacted if we are unable to satisfy the covenants required by our credit facilities.

Our debt agreements contain covenants, including covenants restricting our ability to take certain actions and financial covenants. In addition, our ability to make borrowings under our available credit facilities is subject to the absence of material adverse changes in our business. Our ability to maintain our credit facilities may also be impacted by changes in our ownership base. More specifically, we may be required to prepay our bank financing facilities if any person acquires ownership of more than 50% of our common stock or, subject to certain exceptions, during any 24-month period, a majority of the Board is no longer

Table of Contents

comprised of individuals who were members of the Board on the first day of such period. Our public debt securities also contain change of control provisions that would be triggered by a third-party acquisition of greater than 50% of our common stock coupled with a ratings downgrade.

Our failure to comply with the terms of our debt facilities could result in an event of default. Generally, if an event of default under any debt agreement occurs, then pursuant to cross default acceleration clauses, our outstanding debt and derivative contract payables could become due and/or terminated. In addition, in such events, our credit card processors could hold back payments to create a reserve. We cannot provide assurances that we would have sufficient liquidity to repay, or the ability to refinance the debt if such amounts were accelerated upon an event of default.

If we are unable to appropriately balance our cost management and capital allocation strategies with our goal of satisfying guest expectations, it may adversely impact our business success.

Our goals call for us to provide high quality products and deliver high quality services. There can be no assurance that we can successfully balance these goals with our cost management and capital allocation strategies. Our business also requires us to make capital allocation decisions, such as ordering new ships and/or upgrading our existing fleet, based on expected market preferences and projected demand. There can be no assurance that our strategies will be successful, which could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations. Investments in older tonnage, in particular, run the risk of not meeting expected returns and diluting related asset values.

Our attempts to expand our business into new markets and new ventures may not be successful.

We opportunistically seek to grow our business through, among other things, expansion into new destination or source markets and establishment of new ventures complementary to our current offerings. These attempts to expand our business increase the complexity of our business, require significant levels of investment and can strain our management, personnel, operations and systems. There can be no assurance that these business expansion efforts will develop as anticipated or that we will succeed, and if we do not, we may be unable to recover our investment, which could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our reliance on travel agencies to sell and market our cruises exposes us to certain risks which, if realized, could adversely impact our business.

We rely on travel agencies to generate the majority of bookings for our ships. Accordingly, we must ensure that our commission rates and incentive structures remain competitive. If we fail to offer competitive compensation packages, these agencies may be incentivized to sell cruises offered by our competitors to our detriment, which could adversely impact our operating results. Our reliance on third-party sellers is particularly pronounced in certain markets, such as China, where we have a large number of travel agent charter and group sales and less retail agency and direct booking. In addition, the travel agent industry is sensitive to economic conditions that impact discretionary income. Significant disruptions, especially disruptions impacting those agencies that sell a high volume of our business, or contractions in the industry could reduce the number of travel agencies available for us to market and sell our cruises, which could have an adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

Disruptions in our shoreside operations or our information systems may adversely affect our results of operations.

Our principal executive office and principal shoreside operations are located in Florida, and we have shoreside offices throughout the world. Actual or threatened natural disasters (e.g., hurricanes/typhoons, earthquakes, tornadoes, fires or floods) or similar events in these locations may have a material impact on our business continuity, reputation and results of operations. In addition, substantial or repeated information systems failures, computer viruses or cyber-attacks impacting our shoreside or shipboard operations could adversely impact our business. We do not generally carry business interruption insurance for our shoreside operations or our information systems. As such, any losses or damages incurred by us could have an adverse impact on our results of operations.

The loss of key personnel, our inability to recruit or retain qualified personnel, or disruptions among our shipboard personnel due to strained employee relations could adversely affect our results of operations.

Our success depends, in large part, on the skills and contributions of key executives and other employees, and on our ability to recruit, develop and retain high quality personnel. As demand for qualified personnel in the industry grows, we must continue to effectively recruit, train, motivate and retain our employees, both shoreside and on our ships, in order to effectively compete in our industry, maintain our current business and support our projected global growth.

Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2016, 85% of our shipboard employees were covered by collective bargaining agreements. A dispute under our collective bargaining agreements could result in a work stoppage of those employees covered by the agreements. We may not be able to satisfactorily renegotiate these collective bargaining agreements when they expire. In addition, existing collective bargaining agreements may not prevent a strike or work stoppage on our ships. We may also be subject to or affected by work stoppages unrelated to our business or collective bargaining agreements. Any such work stoppages or potential work stoppages could have a material adverse effect on our financial results, as could a loss of key employees, our inability to recruit or retain qualified personnel or disruptions among our personnel.

Business activities that involve our co-investment with third parties may subject us to additional risks.

Partnerships, joint ventures, and other business structures involving our co-investment with third parties, generally include some form of shared control over the operations of the business and create additional risks, including the possibility that other investors in such ventures could become bankrupt or otherwise lack the financial resources to meet their obligations, or could have or develop business interests, policies or objectives that are inconsistent with ours. With the sale of 51% of our interest in Pullmantur Holdings in July 2016, we continue to expand the breadth of our co-investment activities, which also include TUI Cruises, SkySea Cruises, Grand Bahama Shipyard and minority ownership investments in various port development and other projects. In addition to financial risks, our co-investment activities may also present managerial and operational risks and expose us to reputational or legal concerns. These or other issues related to our co-investment with third parties could adversely impact our operations.

We rely on supply chain vendors and third-party service providers who are integral to the operations of our businesses. These vendors and service providers may be unable or unwilling to deliver on their commitments or may act in ways that could harm our business.

We rely on supply chain vendors to deliver key products to the operations of our businesses around the world. Any event impacting a vendor’s ability to deliver goods of the required quality at the location and time needed could negatively impact our ability to deliver our cruise experience. Events impacting our supply chain could be caused by factors beyond the control of our suppliers or us, including inclement weather, natural disasters, increased demand, problems in production or distribution and/or disruptions in third party logistics or transportation systems. Interruptions to our supply chain could increase costs and could limit the availability of products critical to our operations.

In order to achieve cost and operational efficiencies, we outsource to third-party vendors certain services that are integral to the operations of our global businesses, such as our onboard concessionaires, certain of our call center operations and operation of a large part of our information technology systems. We are subject to the risk that certain decisions are subject to the control of our third-party service providers and that these decisions may adversely affect our activities. A failure to adequately monitor a third-party service provider’s compliance with a service level agreement or regulatory or legal requirements could result in significant economic and reputational harm to us. There is also a risk the confidentiality, privacy and/or security of data held by third parties or communicated over third-party networks or platforms could become compromised.

A failure to keep pace with developments in technology or technological obsolescence could impair our operations or competitive position.

Our business continues to demand the use of sophisticated technology and systems. These technologies and systems require significant investment and must be proven, refined, updated, and/or replaced with more advanced systems in order to continue to meet our customers’ demands and expectations. If we are unable to do so in a timely manner or within reasonable cost parameters or if we are unable to appropriately and timely train our employees to operate any of these new systems, our business could suffer. We also may not achieve the benefits that we anticipate from any new technology or system, and a failure to do so could result in higher than anticipated costs or could impair our operating results.

We may be exposed to risks and costs associated with cyber security and data privacy, including protecting the integrity and security of our guests’, employees’ and business partners’ personal information.

We are subject to various risks associated with the collection, handling, storage and transmission of sensitive information, including risks related to compliance with applicable laws and other contractual obligations, as well as the risk that our systems collecting such information could be compromised. In the course of doing business, we collect large volumes of internal and customer data, including personally identifiable information and individual credit data, for various business purposes. We are subject to federal, state and international laws (including the European Union General Data Protection Regulation which is expected to take effect in May 2018), as well as industry standards, relating to the collection, use, retention, security and transfer of personally identifiable information and individual credit data. In many cases, these laws apply not only to third-party transactions, but also

Table of Contents

to transfers of information between the Company and its subsidiaries, and among the Company, its subsidiaries and other parties with which the Company has commercial relations. Several jurisdictions have passed laws in this area, and other jurisdictions are considering imposing additional restrictions. These laws continue to develop and may be inconsistent from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Complying with emerging and changing international requirements may cause us to incur substantial costs or require us to change our business practices. If we fail to comply with the various applicable data collection and privacy laws, we could be exposed to fines, penalties, restrictions, litigation or other expenses, and our business could be adversely impacted.

In addition, even if we are fully compliant with legal and/or industry standards and any relevant contractual requirements, we still may not be able to prevent security breaches involving sensitive data and/or critical systems. Any breach, theft, loss, or fraudulent use of guest, employee or company data, or breach of any critical systems used in our land based or marine operations, could adversely impact our reputation and brand and our ability to retain or attract new customers, and expose us to risks of data loss, business disruption, governmental investigation, litigation and other liability, any of which could adversely affect our business.

Significant capital investments and other expenditures could be required to remedy the problem and prevent future breaches, including costs associated with additional security technologies, personnel, experts and credit monitoring services for those whose data has been breached. Further, if we or our vendors experience significant data security breaches or fail to detect and appropriately respond to significant data security breaches, we could be exposed to government enforcement actions and private litigation. Additionally, the techniques and sophistication used to conduct cyber-attacks and breaches of information technology systems, as well as the sources and targets of these attacks, change frequently and are often not recognized until such attacks are launched or have been in place for a period of time. Our security measures cannot provide assurance that we will be successful in preventing or identifying such breaches.

The potential unavailability of insurance coverage or an inability to obtain insurance coverage at commercially reasonable rates may adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.

We seek to maintain appropriate insurance coverage at commercially reasonable rates. We normally insure based on the cost of an asset rather than replacement value and we also elect to self-insure, co-insure, or use deductibles in certain circumstances for certain risks such as loss of use of a ship or a cyber-security breach. The limits of insurance coverage we purchase are based on the availability of the coverage, evaluation of our risk profile and cost of coverage. Accordingly, we are not protected against all risks which could result in an unexpected decrease in our revenue and results of operations in the event of an incident.

Our protection and indemnity (“P&I”) liability insurance is placed on a mutual basis and we are subject to additional premium calls in amounts based on claim records of all members of the P&I Club. We are also subject to additional premium assessments including, but not limited to, investment or underwriting shortfalls experienced by the P&I Club.

We cannot be certain that insurance and reinsurance coverage will be available to us and at commercially reasonable rates in the future. Additionally, if we or other insureds sustain significant losses, the result may be higher insurance premiums, cancellation of coverage, or the inability to obtain coverage. Such events could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.

Environmental, labor, health and safety, financial responsibility and other maritime regulations could affect operations and increase operating costs.

The United States and various state and foreign government or regulatory agencies have enacted or may enact environmental regulations or policies, such as requiring the use of low sulfur fuels, that could increase our direct cost to operate in certain markets, increase our cost for fuel, limit the supply of compliant fuel, cause us to incur significant expenses to purchase and/or develop new equipment and adversely impact the cruise vacation industry. While we have taken and expect to continue to take a number of actions to mitigate the potential impact of certain of these regulations, there can be no assurances that these efforts will be successful or completed on a timely basis.

There is increasing global regulatory focus on climate change and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. These regulatory efforts, both internationally and in the United States are still developing, and we cannot yet determine what the final regulatory programs or their impact will be in any jurisdiction where we do business. However, such climate change-related regulatory activity in the future may adversely affect our business and financial results ~~are discussed in “Item 1A.~~by requiring us to reduce our emissions, purchase allowances or otherwise pay for our emissions. Such activity may also impact us by increasing our operating costs, including fuel costs.

Some environmental groups have also lobbied for more stringent regulation of cruise ships and have generated negative publicity about the cruise vacation industry and its environmental impact. See Item 1. ~~Risk Factors~~Business-Regulation-Environmental Regulations ~~” in the~~of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016.

Table of Contents

In addition, we are subject to various international, national, state and ~~there has been no material~~local laws, regulations and treaties that govern, among other things, discharge from our ships, safety standards applicable to our ships, treatment of disabled persons, health and sanitary standards applicable to our guests, security standards on board our ships and at the ship/port interface areas, and financial responsibilities to our guests. These issues are, and we believe will continue to be, an area of focus by the relevant authorities throughout the world. This could result in the enactment of more stringent regulation of cruise ships that could subject us to increasing compliance costs in the future.

A change ~~to these risk factors since previously disclosed. We wish to caution the reader that the risk factors discussed in “Item 1A.~~ ~~Risk Factors~~” in our ~~2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K, and those described elsewhere in this report~~tax status under the United States Internal Revenue Code, or other ~~SEC filings,~~jurisdictions, may have adverse effects on our income.

We and a number of our subsidiaries are foreign corporations that derive income from a U.S. trade or business and/or from sources within the United States. Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, our U.S. tax counsel, has delivered to us an opinion, based on certain representations and assumptions set forth in it, to the effect that this income, to the extent derived from or incidental to the international operation of a ship or ships, is excluded from gross income for U.S. federal income tax purposes pursuant to Section 883 of the Internal Revenue Code. We believe that most of our income (including that of our subsidiaries) is derived from or incidental to the international operation of a ship or ships.

Our ability to rely on Section 883 could ~~cause~~be challenged or could change in the future. Provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, including Section 883, are subject to legislative change at any time. Moreover, changes could occur in the future with respect to the identity, residence or holdings of our direct or indirect shareholders, trading volume or trading frequency of our shares, or relevant foreign tax laws of Liberia such that it no longer qualifies as an equivalent exemption jurisdiction, that could affect our eligibility for the Section 883 exemption. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we will continue to be exempt from U.S. income tax on U.S. source shipping income in the future. If we were not entitled to the benefit of Section 883, we and our subsidiaries would be subject to U.S. taxation on a portion of the income derived from or incidental to the international operation of our ships, which would reduce our net income.

Additionally, portions of our business are operated by companies that are within the United Kingdom tonnage tax regime. Further, some of our operations are conducted in jurisdictions where we rely on tax treaties to provide exemption from taxation. To the extent the United Kingdom tonnage tax laws change or we do not continue to meet the applicable qualification requirements or if tax treaties are changed or revoked, we may be required to pay higher income tax in these jurisdictions, adversely impacting our results of operations.

As budgetary constraints continue to ~~differ materially~~adversely impact the jurisdictions in which we operate, increases in income tax regulations, tax audits or tax reform affecting our operations may be imposed.

Litigation, enforcement actions, fines or penalties could adversely impact our financial condition or results of operations and/or damage our reputation.

Our business is subject to various United States and international laws and regulations that could lead to enforcement actions, fines, civil or criminal penalties or the assertion of litigation claims and damages. In addition, improper conduct by our employees, agents or joint venture partners could damage our reputation and/or lead to litigation or legal proceedings that could result in civil or criminal penalties, including substantial monetary fines. In certain circumstances it may not be economical to defend against such matters and/or a legal strategy may not ultimately result in us prevailing in a matter. Such events could lead to an adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

We are not a United States corporation and our shareholders may be subject to the uncertainties of a foreign legal system in protecting their interests.

Our corporate affairs are governed by our Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws and by the Business Corporation Act of Liberia. The provisions of the Business Corporation Act of Liberia resemble provisions of the corporation laws of a number of states in the United States. However, while most states have a fairly well developed body of case law interpreting their respective corporate statutes, there are very few judicial cases in Liberia interpreting the Business Corporation Act of Liberia. As such, the rights and fiduciary responsibilities of directors under Liberian law are not as clearly established as the rights and fiduciary responsibilities of directors under statutes or judicial precedent in certain United States jurisdictions. For example, the right of shareholders to bring a derivative action in Liberian courts may be more limited than in United States jurisdictions. There may also be practical difficulties for shareholders attempting to bring suit in Liberia and Liberian courts may or may not recognize and enforce foreign judgments. Thus, our public shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests with respect to actions by management, directors or controlling shareholders than would shareholders of a corporation incorporated in a United States jurisdiction.

Table of Contents

Provisions of our Articles of Incorporation, By-Laws and Liberian law could inhibit others from ~~those stated~~acquiring us, prevent a change of control, and may prevent efforts by our shareholders to change our management.

Certain provisions of our Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws and Liberian law may inhibit third parties from effectuating a change of control of the Company without Board approval which could result in ~~any forward-looking statements.~~the entrenchment of current management. These include provisions in our Articles of Incorporation that prevent third parties, other than A. Wilhelmsen AS. and Cruise Associates, from acquiring beneficial ownership of more than 4.9% of our outstanding shares without the consent of our Board of Directors.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Share Repurchases

The following table presents the total number of shares of our common stock that we repurchased during the quarter ended September 30, ~~2016:~~2017:

Period Total number of shares purchased Average price paid per share
Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs⁽¹⁾
Approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs
July 1, 2016 - July 31, 2016 — — — $50,000,000
August 1, 2016 - August 31, 2016 706,715 $70.60 706,715 $—
September 1, 2016 - September 30, 2016 — — — $—
Total 706,715 706,715



Period	Total number of shares purchased	Average price paid per share	Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs⁽¹⁾	Approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs
July 1, 2017 - July 31, 2017	—	—	—	$500,000,000
August 1, 2017 - August 31, 2017	827,826	$120.78	827,826	$400,000,000
September 1, 2017 - September 30, 2017	212,128	$117.83	212,128	$375,000,000
Total	1,039,954		1,039,954

⁽¹⁾~~In October 2015,~~On April 28, 2017, we announced that our board of directors authorized a 12-month common stock repurchase program for up to $500 million. The timing and number of shares to be repurchased will depend on a variety of factors including price and market conditions. During the third quarter of 2017, we repurchased 1.0 million shares of our common stock for a total of $125.0 million in open market transactions that ~~was completed in August 2016. For further information on our~~were recorded within Treasury stock ~~repurchase transactions, please refer to Note 8.~~ ~~Shareholders' Equity~~ toin our consolidated ~~financial statements.~~balance sheet. Repurchases under the program may be made at management's discretion from time to time on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions.

Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits



10.1			Novation Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2017, between Hibisyeu Finance Ltd., Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., Citibank Europe Plc, UK Branch, Citicorp Trustee Company Limited, Citibank N.A., London Branch, HSBC France, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation Europe Limited, Paris Branch and the banks and financial institutions as lender parties thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 28, 2017).

10.2			Novation Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2017, between Hoediscus Finance Ltd., Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., Citibank Europe Plc, UK Branch, Citicorp Trustee Company Limited, Citibank N.A., London Branch, HSBC France, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation Europe Limited, Paris Branch and the banks and financial institutions as lender parties thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 28, 2017).

10.3			Novation Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2017, between Houatorris Finance Ltd., Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., Citibank Europe Plc, UK Branch, Citicorp Trustee Company Limited, Citibank N.A., London Branch, HSBC France, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation Europe Limited, Paris Branch and the banks and financial institutions as lender parties thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 28, 2017).

10.4			Icon 1 Hull No. S-1400 Credit Agreement, dated as of October 11, 2017, between Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., as the Borrower, the Lenders from time to time party thereto, KfW IPEX-Bank GmbH, as Hermes Agent, Facility Agent, Documentation Agent and Initial Mandated Lead Arranger and BNP Paribas Fortis SA/NV as Finnvera Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 17, 2017).
			��
10.5			Icon 2 Hull No. S-1401 Credit Agreement, dated as of October 11, 2017, between Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., as the Borrower, the Lenders from time to time party thereto, KfW IPEX-Bank GmbH, as Hermes Agent, Facility Agent, Documentation Agent and Initial Mandated Lead Arranger and BNP Paribas Fortis SA/NV as Finnvera Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 17, 2017).

10.6			Amendment to the Credit Agreement, dated as of October 12, 2017, among Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., the various financial institutions as are or shall become parties thereto and Nordea Bank AB (PUBL), New York branch, as administrative agent for the lender parties (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 17, 2017).

10.7			Form of 2008 Equity Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Agreement - Executive Officer Grants (Non-Vesting Into Retirement)*

31.1			Certification of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934*

31.2			Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934*

32.1			Certifications of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code**



*		Filed herewith
**		Furnished herewith

Interactive Data File

101 The following financial statements of Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. for the ~~quarter~~period ended September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, formatted in XBRL are filed herewith:

(i) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015;~~2016;


(ii)	the Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015;~~2016;

(iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015;~~2016; and

(iv) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged in summary and detail.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



		ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD.
		(Registrant)


		/s/ JASON T. LIBERTY
		Jason T. Liberty
		Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
~~October 28, 2016~~November 7, 2017		(Principal Financial Officer and duly authorized signatory)

4750



	Page

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements	1

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	2521

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	4439

Item 4. Controls and Procedures	4439

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings	4540

Item 1A. Risk Factors	4540

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	4548

Item 6. Exhibits	4649

SIGNATURES	4750



	Beginning Balance January 1, 2016		Accruals		Payments		Ending Balance September 30, 2016		Cumulative Charges Incurred
Termination benefits	$	—	$	2,416	$	2,416	$	—	$	2,416
Contract termination costs		—		68		68		—		68
Total	$	—	$	2,484	$	2,484	$	—	$	2,484

Large accelerated filer x

Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o

Smaller reporting company o

Emerging growth company o

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)