UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)


~~(Mark One)~~
þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005.


o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period fromto

~~For the transition period from to~~

Commission file number 1-8957

ALASKA AIR GROUP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware		91-1292054
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		~~91-1292054~~ ~~(I.R.S. Employer~~ Identification No.)

19300 ~~International Boulevard,~~Pacific Highway South, Seattle, Washington 98188
(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (206) 392-5040

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesþ Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yesþ Noo

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

The registrant has ~~27,182,608~~27,231,825 common shares, par value $1.00, outstanding at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~


~~PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION~~
~~Item 1.~~		~~Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements~~
~~Item 2.~~		~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and~~
		~~Results of Operations~~
~~Item 3.~~		~~Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk~~
~~Item 4.~~		~~Controls and Procedures~~
~~PART II. OTHER INFORMATION~~
~~Item 1.~~		~~Legal Proceedings~~
~~Item 2.~~		~~Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds~~
~~Item 3.~~		~~Default on Senior Securities~~
~~Item 4.~~		~~Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders~~
~~Item 5.~~		~~Other Information~~
~~Item 6.~~		~~Exhibits~~
~~Signatures~~

Cautionary Note regarding Forward-Looking Statements

In addition to historical information, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements are those that predict or describe future events or trends and that do not relate solely to historical matters. You can generally identify forward-looking statements as statements containing the words “believe,” “expect,” “will,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “project,” “assume” or other similar expressions, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. Some of the things that could cause our actual results to differ from our expectations are: changes in our operating costs including fuel, which can be volatile; the competitive environment and other trends in our industry; our ability to meet our cost reduction goals; labor disputes; economic conditions; our reliance on automated systems; increases in government fees and taxes; actual or threatened terrorist attacks, global instability and potential U.S. military actions or activities; insurance costs; changes in laws and regulations; liability and other claims asserted against us; ~~failure to expand our business; interest rates and the availability of financing;~~operational disruptions; compliance with financial covenants; our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel; ~~changes in our business plans;~~third-party vendors and partners; continuing operating losses; our significant indebtedness; and downgrades of our credit ~~ratings;~~ratings and ~~inflation.~~availability of financing. For a discussion of these and other risk factors, see Item 7 of the Company’s Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2004 on Form 10-K under the caption “Risk Factors.” All of the forward-looking statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to the risk factors discussed therein. These risk factors may not be exhaustive. We operate in a continually changing business environment, and new risk factors emerge from time to time. Management cannot predict such new risk factors, nor can it assess the impact, if any, of such new risk factors on our business or events described in any forward-looking statements. We disclaim any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements after the date of this report to conform them to actual results. Over time, our actual results, performance or achievements will likely differ from the anticipated results, performance or achievements that are expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements, and such differences might be significant and materially adverse.

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

~~Item 1:~~ITEM 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (unaudited)
Alaska Air Group, Inc.

ASSETS



	March 31,		December 31,		June 30,		December 31,
(In Millions)	2005		2004		2005		2004

Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	272.4	$	54.3	$	31.2	$	28.0
Marketable securities		491.1		819.6		694.9		845.9
Receivables – net		119.6		99.4
Inventories and supplies – net		43.7		42.0
Receivables — net						125.8		99.4
Inventories and supplies — net						46.1		42.0
Deferred income taxes		80.2		74.7		75.5		74.7
Fuel hedge contracts		124.4		65.7		123.6		65.7
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		102.7		86.6		102.0		86.6

Total Current Assets		1,234.1		1,242.3		1,199.1		1,242.3


Property and Equipment
Flight equipment		2,225.0		2,294.3
Aircraft and other flight equipment						2,236.7		2,294.3
Other property and equipment		467.8		471.8		471.6		471.8
Deposits for future flight equipment		82.5		67.1		203.6		67.1

		2,775.3		2,833.2		2,911.9		2,833.2
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		951.8		924.9		979.9		924.9

Total Property and Equipment – Net		1,823.5		1,908.3
Total Property and Equipment — Net						1,932.0		1,908.3


Intangible Assets		38.6		38.6		38.6		38.6


Fuel Hedge Contracts		65.1		30.3		70.9		30.3


Other Assets		139.3		115.5		129.9		115.5


Total Assets	$	3,300.6	$	3,335.0	$	3,370.5	$	3,335.0

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (unaudited)
Alaska Air Group, Inc.

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY


							June 30,			December 31,
	March 31,			December 31,
(In Millions Except Share Amounts)	2005			2004

(In Millions)							2005			2004
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable	$	142.3		$	143.8		$	132.6		$	143.8
Accrued aircraft rent		64.3			75.3			58.5			75.3
Accrued wages, vacation and payroll taxes		112.5			133.0			111.3			133.0
Other accrued liabilities		342.7			301.6			350.9			301.6
Air traffic liability		340.3			250.2			375.6			250.2
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations		54.0			53.4			57.0			53.4

Total Current Liabilities		1,056.1			957.3			1,085.9			957.3


Long-Term Debt and Capital Lease Obligations, Net of Current		980.4			989.6
Long-Term Debt and Capital Lease Obligations								979.5			989.6

Other Liabilities and Credits
Deferred income taxes		131.1			173.6			137.0			173.6
Deferred revenue		307.4			304.7			313.8			304.7
Other liabilities		241.1			245.0			253.2			245.0

		679.6			723.3			704.0			723.3

Commitments and Contingencies

Shareholders’ Equity
Preferred stock, $1 par value		—			—
Authorized: 5,000,000 shares, none issued or outstanding								—			—
Common stock, $1 par value		29.8			29.8
Authorized: 100,000,000 shares Issued:
Issued: 2005 - 29,832,756 shares 2004 - 29,777,388 shares
Authorized: 100,000,000 shares
Issued: 2005 -29,880,002 shares 2004 - 29,777,388 shares								29.9			29.8
Capital in excess of par value		497.5			496.5			498.5			496.5
Treasury stock (common), at cost: 2005 - 2,650,148 shares 2004 - 2,651,368 shares		(60.5	)		(60.5	)
2004 - 2,651,368 shares
Treasury stock, at cost: 2005 - 2,648,177 shares 2004 - 2,651,368 shares								(60.4	)		(60.5	)
Deferred stock-based compensation		(3.1	)		(3.4	)		(2.8	)		(3.4	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(82.7	)		(81.6	)		(85.0	)		(81.6	)
Retained earnings		203.5			284.0			220.9			284.0

		584.5			664.8			601.1			664.8

Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	3,300.6		$	3,335.0		$	3,370.5		$	3,335.0

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (unaudited)
Alaska Air Group, Inc.



Three Months Ended March 31
Three Months Ended June 30
(In Millions Except Per Share Amounts)	2005			2004			2005			2004

Operating Revenues
Passenger	$	587.0		$	553.3		$	697.5		$	637.9
Freight and mail		20.3			18.6			24.9			24.2
Other – net		35.2			26.1
Other — net								34.1			39.2

Total Operating Revenues		642.5			598.0			756.5			701.3

Operating Expenses
Wages and benefits		244.7			241.8			227.3			246.4
Contracted services		30.6			27.5			34.8			31.9
Aircraft fuel		146.7			107.8			175.2			128.6
Aircraft maintenance		61.2			50.8			58.2			50.1
Aircraft rent		46.1			47.8			47.0			47.0
Food and beverage service		11.5			11.6			12.1			13.6
Other selling expenses and commissions		37.4			38.4			37.8			35.6
Depreciation and amortization		34.2			36.1			35.3			34.0
Landing fees and other rentals		52.2			42.6			51.9			46.6
Other		51.4			49.7			53.1			50.9
Restructuring charges, primarily write-off of Oakland leasehold improvements		7.4			—
Impairment of F-28 aircraft and spare engines		—			2.4
Restructuring charges								14.7			—
Impairment of aircraft and related spare parts								—			37.2

Total Operating Expenses		723.4			656.5			747.4			721.9

Operating Loss		(80.9	)		(58.5	)
Operating Income (Loss)								9.1			(20.6	)

Nonoperating Income (Expense)
Interest income		5.9			4.6			7.1			6.1
Interest expense		(14.1	)		(12.7	)		(15.3	)		(12.6	)
Interest capitalized		0.8			0.3			1.3			0.3
Fuel hedging gains		108.2			0.4			27.5			25.9
Other – net		(2.9	)		(0.3	)
Other — net								—			0.2

		97.9			(7.7	)		20.6			19.9

Income (loss) before income tax and accounting change		17.0			(66.2	)
Income tax expense (benefit)		7.1			(23.5	)
Income (loss) before income tax								29.7			(0.7	)
Income tax expense								12.3			1.0

Income (loss) before accounting change		9.9			(42.7	)
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax		(90.4	)		—
Net Income (Loss)							$	17.4		$	(1.7	)

Net Loss	$	(80.5	)	$	(42.7	)

Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share:
Income (loss) before accounting change	$	0.36		$	(1.59	)
Cumulative effect of accounting change		(3.33	)		—

Net Loss Per Share	$	(2.97	)	$	(1.59	)

Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share:
Income (loss) before accounting change	$	0.34		$	(1.59	)
Cumulative effect of accounting change		(2.73	)		—

Net Loss Per Share	$	(2.39	)	$	(1.59	)
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share							$	0.64		$	(0.06	)
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share							$	0.56		$	(0.06	)

Pro Forma Results(assuming change in method of accounting was applied retrospectively):
Pro forma net loss	NA			$	(40.5	)
Pro forma net income							NA			$	2.2

Pro Forma Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share				$	(1.51	)
Pro Forma Basic and Diluted Income Per Share							NA			$	0.08

Shares used for computation:
Basic		27.147			26.778			27.200			26.818
Diluted		33.158			26.778			33.273			26.818

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

~~CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY~~CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (unaudited)
Alaska Air Group, Inc.

Accumulated
Common Capital in Treasury Deferred Other
Shares Common Excess of Stock, Stock-Based Comprehensive Retained
(In Millions) Outstanding Stock Par Value at Cost Compensation Loss Earnings Total

Balances at December 31, 2004 27.126 $ 29.8 $ 496.5 $ (60.5 ) $ (3.4 ) $ (81.6 ) $ 284.0 $ 664.8

Net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2005 (80.5 ) (80.5 )
Other comprehensive income (loss):

Related to marketable securities:
Change in fair value (0.5 )
Reclassification to earnings 2.5
Income tax effect (0.7 )

1.3 1.3

Related to fuel hedges:
Reclassification to earnings (3.8 )
Income tax effect 1.4

(2.4 ) (2.4 )

Total comprehensive loss (81.6 )

Amortization of deferred stock-based compensation 0.3 0.3
Treasury stock sales 0.001 — — — —
Stock issued for employee stock purchase plan 0.032 — 0.6 — 0.6
Stock issued under stock plans 0.024 — 0.4 — 0.4

Balances at March 31, 2005 27.183 $ 29.8 $ 497.5 $ (60.5 ) $ (3.1 ) $ (82.7 ) $ 203.5 $ 584.5


Six Months Ended June 30
(In Millions Except Per Share Amounts)	2005			2004
Operating Revenues
Passenger	$	1,284.5		$	1,191.7
Freight and mail		45.2			42.8
Other — net		69.3			64.8

Total Operating Revenues		1,399.0			1,299.3

Operating Expenses
Wages and benefits		472.0			488.2
Contracted services		65.4			59.4
Aircraft fuel		321.9			236.4
Aircraft maintenance		119.4			100.9
Aircraft rent		93.1			94.8
Food and beverage service		23.6			25.2
Other selling expenses and commissions		75.2			74.0
Depreciation and amortization		69.5			70.1
Landing fees and other rentals		104.1			89.2
Other		104.5			100.6
Restructuring charges		22.1			—
Impairment of aircraft and related spare parts		—			39.6

Total Operating Expenses		1,470.8			1,378.4

Operating Loss		(71.8	)		(79.1	)

Nonoperating Income (Expense)
Interest income		13.0			10.7
Interest expense		(29.4	)		(25.3	)
Interest capitalized		2.1			0.6
Fuel hedging gains		135.7			26.4
Other — net		(2.9	)		(0.2	)

		118.5			12.2

Income (loss) before income tax and accounting change		46.7			(66.9	)
Income tax expense (benefit)		19.4			(22.5	)

Income (loss) before accounting change		27.3			(44.4	)
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax		(90.4	)		—

Net Loss	$	(63.1	)	$	(44.4	)

Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share:
Income (loss) before accounting change	$	1.01		$	(1.66	)
Cumulative effect of accounting change		(3.33	)		—

Net Loss Per Share	$	(2.32	)	$	(1.66	)

Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share:
Income (loss) before accounting change	$	0.90		$	(1.66	)
Cumulative effect of accounting change		(2.72	)		—

Net Loss Per Share	$	(1.82	)	$	(1.66	)

Pro Forma Results(assuming change in method of accounting was applied retrospectively):
Pro forma net loss	NA			$	(38.3	)

Pro Forma Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share	NA			$	(1.43	)

Shares used for computation:
Basic		27.173			26.798
Diluted		33.256			26.798

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (unaudited)
Alaska Air Group, Inc.


													Accumulated
	Common				Capital in		Treasury			Deferred			Other
	Shares		Common		Excess of		Stock,			Stock-Based			Comprehensive			Retained
(In Millions)	Outstanding		Stock		Par Value		at Cost			Compensation			Income (Loss)			Earnings			Total
Balances at December 31, 2004:		27.126	$	29.8	$	496.5	$	(60.5	)	$	(3.4	)	$	(81.6	)	$	284.0		$	664.8

Net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2005																	(63.1	)		(63.1	)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Related to marketable securities:
Change in fair value														(0.5	)
Reclassification to earnings														2.5
Income tax effect														(0.7	)


														1.3						1.3

Related to fuel hedges:
Reclassification to earnings														(7.4	)
Income tax effect														2.7

														(4.7	)					(4.7	)


Total comprehensive loss																				(66.5	)

Amortization of deferred stock-based compensation											0.6									0.6
Treasury stock sales		0.003		—		—		0.1												0.1
Stock issued for employee stock purchase plan		0.066		0.1		1.2		—												1.3
Stock issued under stock plans		0.037		—		0.8		—												0.8

Balances at June 30, 2005		*27.232*	$	29.9	$	498.5	$	(60.4	)	$	(2.8	)	$	(85.0	)	$	220.9		$	601.1

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)
Alaska Air Group, Inc.



Three Months Ended March 31 (In Millions)	2005			2004

Six Months Ended June 30 (In Millions)							2005			2004
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(80.5	)	$	(42.7	)	$	(63.1	)	$	(44.4	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax effect		90.4			—			90.4			—
Restructuring charges, primarily write-off of Oakland leasehold improvements		7.4			—
Impairment of F-28 aircraft and spare engines		—			2.4
Restructuring charges								22.1			—
Impairment of aircraft and related spare parts								—			39.6
Depreciation and amortization		34.2			36.1			69.5			70.1
Amortization of airframe and engine overhauls		—			18.7			—			35.1
Stock-based compensation		0.3			—			0.6			—
Changes in fair values of open fuel hedge contracts		(97.3	)		(0.4	)		(105.9	)		(24.1	)
(Gain) loss on sale of assets		(0.3	)		0.4
Loss on sale of assets								1.4			1.4
Changes in deferred income taxes		6.3			(22.9	)		16.9			(13.2	)
Increase in receivables — net		(20.2	)		(22.3	)		(26.4	)		(0.4	)
Increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets		(17.3	)		(29.6	)		(20.0	)		(24.1	)
Increase in air traffic liability		90.1			71.9			125.4			103.9
Increase in other current liabilities		8.7			4.8
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue and other-net		(25.1	)		5.2
Increase (decrease) in other current liabilities								(13.6	)		27.4
Increase in deferred revenue and other-net								(7.0	)		17.5

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		(3.3	)		21.6
Net cash provided by operating activities								90.3			188.8

Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from disposition of assets		2.0			4.1			3.4			4.4
Purchases of marketable securities		(127.0	)		(187.9	)		(598.3	)		(440.3	)
Sales and maturities of marketable securities		457.4			142.3			751.3			396.6
Property and equipment additions:
Aircraft purchase deposits		(41.2	)		(3.3	)		(152.8	)		(5.5	)
Capitalized overhauls		—			(13.6	)		—			(24.5	)
Aircraft		(57.4	)		(40.1	)
Other flight equipment		(1.9	)		(5.9	)
Other property		(11.2	)		(5.4	)
Aircraft and other flight equipment								(73.3	)		(50.3	)
Other property and equipment								(21.6	)		(22.4	)
Aircraft deposits returned		7.2			14.0			7.5			14.0
Restricted deposits and other		1.1			(2.0	)		1.0			—

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		229.0			(97.8	)
Net cash used in investing activities								(82.8	)		(128.0	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt, net		—			62.6			20.0			94.6
Long-term debt and capital lease payments		(8.6	)		(15.1	)		(26.5	)		(144.8	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		1.0			0.7			2.2			1.6

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(7.6	)		48.2
Net cash used in financing activities								(4.3	)		(48.6	)

Net change in cash and cash equivalents		218.1			(28.0	)		3.2			12.2
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		54.3			192.9
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period								28.0			158.8

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	272.4		$	164.9		$	31.2		$	171.0

Supplemental disclosure of cash paid during the period for:
Supplemental disclosure of cash paid (refunded) during the period for:
Interest (net of amount capitalized)	$	9.8		$	9.0		$	26.0		$	24.7
Income taxes		0.7			—			1.1			(42.9	)
Noncash investing and financing activities:
Assets acquired under capital leases		—			34.2
Assets acquired under long-term debt and capital leases								—			30.6
Credit received for flight deposits deferred in other liabilities								9.7			—

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

Alaska Air Group, Inc.

Note 1. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies

Organization and Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Alaska Air Group, Inc. (Air Group or the Company) include the accounts of the parent company, Alaska Air Group, Inc., and its principal subsidiaries, Alaska Airlines, Inc. (Alaska) and Horizon Air Industries, Inc. (Horizon), through which the Company conducts substantially all of its operations. These interim condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

In the opinion of management, all adjustments have been made which are necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position as of June 30, 2005, as well as the results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2005. The adjustments made were of a normal recurring nature.

The Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). In preparing these condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities ~~the~~and disclosure of contingent liabilities, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. Significant estimates made include assumptions used to record liabilities, expenses and revenues associated with the Company’s Mileage Plan, amounts ~~to be~~ paid to lessors upon aircraft lease terminations, the fair market value of surplus or impaired aircraft, engines and parts, assumptions used in the calculations of pension expense in the Company’s ~~Defined Benefit Plans~~defined benefit plans, and the amounts of certain accrued liabilities. Actual results may differ from the Company’s estimates.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to conform the prior year’s data to the current format.

Stock Options

The Company applies the intrinsic value method in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”, and related Interpretations in accounting for stock options.

The following table represents the pro forma net income (loss) before accounting change and pro forma net ~~loss~~income (loss) per share (EPS) had compensation cost for the Company’s stock options been determined in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” In accordance with SFAS No. 123, the fair value of each stock option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and then amortized ratably over the vesting ~~period.~~

Three Months Ended March 31,
2005 2004

Income (loss) before accounting change (in millions)

Income (loss) as reported $ 9.9 $ (42.7 )
Add: Total stock-based compensation expense recognized under the intrinsic value-based method, net of related tax 0.2 —
Deduct: Total stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value- based methods for all awards, net of related tax (1.0 ) (1.1 )

Pro forma income (loss) before accounting change
$ 9.1 $ (43.8 )

Net loss as reported $ (80.5 ) $ (42.7 )
Add: Total stock-based compensation expense recognized under the intrinsic value-based method, net of related tax 0.2 —
Deduct: Total stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value- based methods for all awards, net of related tax (1.0 ) (1.1 )

Pro forma net loss $ (81.3 ) $ (43.8 )

Basic EPS before accounting change:
As reported $ 0.36 $ (1.59 )
Pro forma 0.34 (1.64 )
Basic EPS:
As reported $ (2.97 ) $ (1.59 )
Pro forma (2.99 ) (1.64 )
Diluted EPS before accounting change:
As reported $ 0.34 $ (1.59 )
Pro forma 0.31 (1.64 )
Diluted EPS:
As reported $ (2.39 ) $ (1.59 )
Pro forma (2.42 ) (1.64 )
period (in millions, except per share amounts):


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2005			2004			2005			2004

Income (loss) before accounting change As reported	$	17.4		$	(1.7	)	$	27.3		$	(44.4	)
Add: Total stock-based compensation expense recognized under the intrinsic value-based method, net of related tax		0.2			—			0.4			—
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based methods for all awards, net of related tax effects		(1.3	)		(1.2	)		(2.3	)		(2.3	)

Pro forma income (loss) before accounting change	$	16.3		$	(2.9	)	$	25.4		$	(46.7	)


Net income (loss) as reported	$	17.4		$	(1.7	)	$	(63.1	)	$	(44.4	)
Add: Total stock-based compensation expense recognized under the intrinsic value-based method, net of related tax		0.2			—			0.4			—
Deduct: Total stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value- based methods for all awards, net of related tax		(1.3	)		(1.2	)		(2.3	)		(2.3	)

Pro forma net income (loss)	$	16.3		$	(2.9	)	$	(65.0	)	$	(46.7	)


Basic EPS before accounting change:
As reported	$	0.64		$	(0.06	)	$	1.01		$	(1.66	)
Pro forma	$	0.60			(0.11	)	$	0.93			(1.74	)
Basic EPS:
As reported	$	0.64		$	(0.06	)	$	(2.32	)	$	(1.66	)
Pro forma	$	0.60			(0.11	)	$	(2.39	)		(1.74	)
Diluted EPS before accounting change:
As reported	$	0.56		$	(0.06	)	$	0.90		$	(1.66	)
Pro forma	$	0.53			(0.11	)	$	0.84		$	(1.74	)
Diluted EPS:
As reported	$	0.56		$	(0.06	)	$	(1.82	)	$	(1.66	)
Pro forma	$	0.53			(0.11	)	$	(1.87	)		(1.74	)

During the fourth quarter of 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS 123R, “Share Based Payment: An Amendment of SFAS Nos. 123 and 95”. The new standard requires companies to recognize as expense the fair value of stock options and other equity-based compensation issued to employees as of the grant date. This new standard will apply to both stock options that we grant to employees and our Employee Stock Purchase Plan, which features a look-back provision and allows employees to purchase stock at a 15% discount. Implementation of SFAS 123R will be effective January 1, 2006. Our options are typically granted with ~~graded~~ratable vesting provisions, and we intend to amortize compensation cost over the service period using the straight line method. ~~Due to a recent decision by the Securities and Exchange Commission, implementation of SFAS 123R will be effective January 1, 2006.~~ We intend to use the “modified prospective method” upon adoption whereby previously awarded but unvested equity awards are accounted for in accordance with SFAS 123R and ~~prospective~~pro spective amounts are recognized in the income statement instead of simply being disclosed. Once adopted, we expect our stock based compensation expense, as measured under SFAS 123R, will be approximately ~~$ 6~~$6 million to $10 million per year on a pre-tax basis.

Note 2. Change in Accounting Principle

Effective January 1, 2005, the Company changed its method of accounting for major airframe and engine overhauls from thecapitalize and amortizemethod to thedirect expensemethod. Under the former method, these costs were capitalized and amortized to maintenance expense over the shorter of the life of the overhaul or the remaining lease term. Under thedirect expensemethod, overhaul costs are expensed as incurred. The Company believes that thedirect expensemethod is preferable because it eliminates the judgment and estimation needed to determine overhaul versus repair allocations in maintenance activities. Additionally, the Company’s approved maintenance program for the majority of its airframes now focuses more on shorter, but more frequent, maintenance ~~visits that result in a higher portion of the work being repair activity.~~visits. Management also believes that thedirect expensemethod is the predominant method used in the airline industry. Accordingly, effective ~~January~~Januar y 1, 2005, the Company wrote off the net book value of its previously capitalized airframe and engine overhauls for all aircraft in a charge totaling $144.7 million pre-tax ($90.4 million after tax). The Company does not believe disclosing the effect of adopting thedirect expensemethod on net income for the period ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005 provides meaningful information because of changes in the Company’s maintenance program, including the execution of a “power by the hour” engine maintenance agreement with a third party in late 2004.

Note 3. Restructuring Charges

During ~~March~~the second quarter of 2005, Alaska announced that it was contracting out ramp services at the ~~Company notified the Port~~Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. This event resulted in a reduction of Oakland of its decision to terminate the lease for the Oakland hangar as part of its ongoing restructuring efforts. Accordingly, the Company has recorded an impairment charge for the leasehold improvements that will be abandoned as a result of the lease termination. Additionally, the Company has recorded a charge for for certainapproximately 475 employees in Seattle. Severance and related costs associated with this restructuring are estimated at $16.1 million, which was recorded in the ~~lease termination.~~

The following table displays the activity and balance of the asset impairment and lease termination costs components of the Company’s restructuring reserve as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2005 ($ in millions):second quarter.

Asset Impairment and Lease Termination Costs

Balance at December 31, 2004 $ 0.0
Asset impairment charge 7.7
Write-off of impaired assets (7.7 )
Lease termination costs 0.3
Cash payments (0.1 )

Balance at March 31, 2005 $ 0.2

During the third quarter of 2004, Alaska announced a management reorganization and the closure of its Oakland heavy maintenance base, contracting out of the Company’s fleet service and ground support equipment and facility maintenance functions, as well as other initiatives. ~~In total, these restructuring activities are expected to result~~

Restructuring charges totaling $53.4 million were recorded in ~~a reduction of approximately 900 employees.~~

2004, with $38.7 million remaining accrued at December 31, 2004.

The following table displays the activity and balance of the severance and related costs components of the Company’s restructuring ~~reserve~~accrual as of and for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005. The restructuring charge adjustment relates to our change in estimated costs of medical coverage extended to impacted ~~employees.~~employees and a change in the number of employees affected. We expect to record similar adjustments in future quarters as actual medical costs become known. There were no restructuring charges during the first ~~quarter~~six months of 2004 ($ in millions):

Severance and Related Costs

Balance at December 31, 2004 $ 38.7
Restructuring adjustment (0.6 )
Cash payments (20.3 )

Balance at March 31, 2005 $ 17.8


Accruals for Severance and Related Costs

Balance at December 31, 2004	$	38.7
Restructuring charges		16.1
Restructuring charge adjustments		(2.0	)
Cash payments		(29.5	)

Balance at June 30, 2005	$	23.3

The Company will make the majority of the remaining cash payments during the ~~second quarter~~third and fourth quarters of 2005.

The balance at June 30, 2005 is included in accrued wages, vacation and payroll taxes in the consolidated balance sheets.

~~Note 4. Impairment~~During March 2005, the Company notified the Port of ~~F-28 Aircraft and Related Spare Engines~~

~~During~~Oakland of its decision to terminate the ~~first quarter~~lease for the Oakland hangar as part of ~~2004, Horizon~~its ongoing restructuring efforts. Accordingly, the Company recorded an impairment charge of ~~$2.4~~$7.7 million in the first quarter of 2005 for the leasehold improvements that will be abandoned as a result of the lease termination. Additionally, the Company recorded a charge of $0.3 million for certain costs associated with ~~its F-28 aircraft and spare engines to lower~~ the ~~carrying value~~lease termination, all of ~~these assets to their estimated net realizable value.~~

which has been paid as of June 30, 2005.

Note 5.4. Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company records all derivative instruments, all of which are currently fuel hedge contracts, on the balance sheet at their fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recorded each period in ~~earnings or other comprehensive income, depending on the type of hedging instrument and the effectiveness of the hedges.~~

earnings.

The Company’s operations are inherently dependent upon the price and availability of aircraft fuel, which accounted for ~~20.5%~~20.0% of all of 2004 and ~~16.5%~~22.2% of year-to-date 2005 ~~and 2004~~ operating expenses (excluding impairment and restructuring charges)~~, respectively.~~. To manage economic risks associated with fluctuations in aircraft fuel prices, the Company enters into swap agreements and call options for crude oil.

Because of variations in the spread between the prices of West Texas Intermediate crude oil and jet fuel since the second quarter of 2004, the Company’s hedge contracts are not “highly correlated” to changes in prices of aircraft fuel, as defined in SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” The impacts on the Company’s reported results are as follows:

	•		All changes in the fair value of fuel hedge contracts that existed as of March 31, 2004 or hedge positions entered into subsequent to March 31, 2004 are reported in other non-operating income (expense).

	•		Reported fuel expense includes only the effective portion of gains associated with hedge positions that settled during the current period on contracts that existed at March 31, 2004 to the extent that mark-to-market gains were already included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss at March 31, 2004.

The following table summarizes realized fuel hedging gains and changes in fair value of hedging contracts outstanding as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005 and 2004 (in millions):


	Alaska Airlines						Horizon Air
	Three Months Ended June 30
	2005			2004			2005			2004

Fuel expense before hedge activities (“raw” or “into-plane” fuel cost)	$	154.7		$	117.0		$	24.2		$	16.6
Less: gains on settled hedges included in fuel expense		(3.2	)		(4.4	)		(0.5	)		(0.6	)

GAAP fuel expense	$	151.5		$	112.6		$	23.7		$	16.0

Less: gains on settled hedges included in nonoperating income (expense)		(21.3	)		(3.2	)		(3.2	)		(0.4	)

Economic fuel expense	$	130.2		$	109.4		$	20.5		$	15.6


Mark-to-market hedging gains included in nonoperating income (expense)	$	2.6		$	19.6		$	0.4		$	2.7

1213



	Alaska Airlines						Horizon Air						Alaska Airlines						Horizon Air
	Three Months Ended March 31												Six Months Ended June 30
	2005			2004			2005			2004			2005			2004			2005			2004

Fuel expense before hedge activities (“raw” or “into-plane” fuel cost)	$	131.0		$	96.7		$	19.5		$	14.6		$	285.7		$	213.7		$	43.6		$	31.2
Less: gains on settled hedges included in fuel expense		(3.4	)		(3.1	)		(0.4	)		(0.4	)		(6.6	)		(7.5	)		(0.8	)		(1.0	)

GAAP fuel expense	$	127.6		$	93.6		$	19.1		$	14.2		$	279.1		$	206.2		$	42.8		$	30.2

Less: gains on settled hedges included in nonoperating income (expense)		(15.7	)		—			(2.5	)		—			(37.0	)		(3.2	)		(5.7	)		(0.4	)

Economic fuel expense	$	111.9		$	93.6		$	16.6		$	14.2		$	242.1		$	203.0		$	37.1		$	29.8


Mark-to-market hedging gains included in nonoperating income (expense)	$	77.7		$	0.4		$	12.3		$	—		$	80.3		$	20.1		$	12.7		$	2.7

Fuel hedge positions entered into by Alaska and Horizon are currently as follows:

Approximate % of
Expected Fuel Gallons Hedged Approximate Crude
Requirements (in millions) Oil Price per Barrel
Second Quarter 2005 50 % 51.9 $ 28.97
Third Quarter 2005 50 % 55.7 $ 28.81
Fourth Quarter 2005 50 % 50.4 $ 31.85
First Quarter 2006 50 % 50.8 $ 35.70
Second Quarter 2006 50 % 53.5 $ 39.76
Third Quarter 2006 40 % 45.9 $ 41.58
Fourth Quarter 2006 30 % 31.2 $ 42.70
First Quarter 2007 20 % 20.9 $ 43.09
Second Quarter 2007 15 % 16.5 $ 43.86
Third Quarter 2007 15 % 17.7 $ 43.50
Fourth Quarter 2007 10 % 10.7 $ 47.29
First Quarter 2008 5 % 5.4 $ 51.56


	Approximate % of					Approximate Crude
	Expected Fuel			Gallons Hedged		Oil Price per
	Requirements			(in millions)		Barrel
Third Quarter 2005		50	%		55.7	$	28.81
Fourth Quarter 2005		50	%		50.4	$	31.85
First Quarter 2006		50	%		50.8	$	35.70
Second Quarter 2006		50	%		53.5	$	39.76
Third Quarter 2006		40	%		45.9	$	41.58
Fourth Quarter 2006		30	%		31.2	$	42.70
First Quarter 2007		20	%		20.9	$	43.09
Second Quarter 2007		19	%		21.3	$	45.11
Third Quarter 2007		22	%		26.0	$	45.27
Fourth Quarter 2007		17	%		17.8	$	47.89
First Quarter 2008		11	%		12.3	$	50.44
Second Quarter 2008		6	%		7.1	$	49.26
Third Quarter 2008		6	%		6.8	$	48.97
Fourth Quarter 2008		5	%		5.5	$	48.68

The fair values of the Company’s fuel hedge positions for the period ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 were ~~$189.5~~$194.5 million and $96.0 million, respectively, and are presented as fuel hedge contracts as both current and non-current assets in the consolidated balance sheets.

Note 6.5. Other Assets

~~Other~~

At June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 , other assets consisted of the following (in millions):


		June 30, 2005		December 31, 2004

Restricted deposits (primarily restricted investments)	$	87.3	$	84.2
Deferred costs and other		42.6		27.7
Restricted cash for senior convertible notes		—		3.6

	$	129.9	$	115.5

March 31, 2005 December 31, 2004

Restricted deposits (primarily restricted investments) $ 85.4 $ 84.2
Deferred costs and other 52.4 27.7
Restricted cash for senior convertible notes 1.5 3.6

$ 139.3 $ 115.5

Note 7.6. Mileage Plan

Alaska’s Mileage Plan liabilities are included under the following balance sheet captions (in millions):



	March 31, 2005		December 31, 2004			June 30, 2005		December 31, 2004

Current Liabilities:
Other accrued liabilities	$	149.5	$	136.6	$	154.6	$	136.6
Other Liabilities and Credits (non-current):
Deferred revenue		257.9		252.9		256.6		252.9
Other liabilities		20.1		19.8		20.0		19.8

Total					$	431.2	$	409.3
	$	427.5	$	409.3

Note 8.7. Employee Benefit Plans

Pension Plans-Qualified Defined Benefit

Net pension expense for the three and six months ended ~~March 31~~June 30 included the following components (in millions):


							Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
							June 30,						June 30,
	March 31, 2005			March 31, 2004				2005			2004			2005			2004

Service cost	$	13.7		$	13.7		$	11.8		$	13.7		$	25.5		$	27.4
Interest cost		12.9			12.0			12.9			12.0			25.8			24.0
Expected return on assets		(12.5	)		(10.7	)		(12.5	)		(10.7	)		(25.0	)		(21.4	)
Amortization of prior service cost		1.2			1.3			1.2			1.3			2.4			2.6
Actuarial gain		3.6			3.7			3.6			3.7			7.2			7.4

Net pension expense	$	18.9		$	20.0		$	17.0		$	20.0		$	35.9		$	40.0

The Company made $19.3 million and $38.6 million in contributions during the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively, and expects to contribute an additional $19.3 million to these plans during the remainder of 2005. The Company made $16.5 million and $32.9 million in contributions to its defined benefit pension plans during the three and six months ended March 31, 2004. The Company made $19.3 million in contributions during the three months ended March 31, 2005, and expects to contribute an additional $38.5 million to these plans during the remainder of 2005.June 30, 2004, respectively.

Pension Plans-Nonqualified Defined Benefit

Net pension expense for the unfunded, noncontributory defined benefit plans for certain elected officers of the Company for the three and six months ended ~~March 31~~June 30 included the following components (in millions):


					Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
					June 30,				June 30,
	March 31, 2005		March 31, 2004			2005		2004		2005		2004

Service cost		$0.3		$0.3	$	0.3	$	0.3	$	0.6	$	0.6
Interest cost		0.4		0.5		0.4		0.5		0.8		1.0
Actuarial gain		0.1		0.2		0.1		0.2		0.2		0.4

Net pension expense		$0.8		$1.0	$	0.8	$	1.0	$	1.6	$	2.0

Postretirement Medical Benefits

Net periodic benefit cost for the postretirement medical plans for the three and six months ended ~~March 31~~June 30 included the following ~~components:~~components (in millions):


							Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
							June 30,						June 30,
	March 31, 2005			March 31, 2004				2005			2004			2005			2004

Service cost		$1.0			$1.2		$	1.0		$	1.2		$	2.0		$	2.4
Interest cost		1.1			1.3			1.1			1.3			2.2			2.6
Amortization of prior service cost		(0.1	)		(0.1	)		(0.1	)		(0.1	)		(0.2	)		(0.2	)
Actuarial gain		0.5			0.7			0.5			0.7			1.0			1.4

Net periodic benefit cost		$2.5			$3.1		$	2.5		$	3.1		$	5.0		$	6.2

Note 9.8. Earnings Per Share

SFAS No. 128, “Earnings per Share” requires that companies use income from continuing operations before extraordinary items and the cumulative effect of an accounting change as the “control number” in determining whether potential common shares are dilutive or antidilutive. As the Company reported income before the accounting change infor both the quarter and the six months ended June 30, 2005, the potential common shares from the Company’s common stock options and senior convertible notes are included in the calculation for diluted earnings (loss) per share. Therefore, for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005, the dilutive impact of common stock options and 5.8 million common shares that would have been outstanding upon conversion of the senior convertible notes were included in the calculations. ~~Options~~Outstanding options to purchase 1.9 million common shares were excluded from the calculation in 2005 as the impact of those options would have been antidilutive. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, options to purchase 3.9 million shares and the effect of the senior convertible

notes were excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share in 2004 because the impact would have been antidilutive. Income (loss) per share was calculated as follows (in millions except per share amounts).

Three Months Ended
March 31,
2005 2004

Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Income (loss) before accounting change $ 9.9 $ (42.7 )
Weighted average shares outstanding 27.147 26.778

Income (loss) per share before accounting change $ 0.36 $ (1.59 )

Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax $ (90.4 ) NA
Weighted average shares outstanding 27.147 NA

Per share cumulative effect of accounting change $ (3.33 ) NA

Net loss $ (80.5 ) $ (42.7 )
Weighted average shares outstanding 27.147 26.778

Net loss per share $ (2.97 ) $ (1.59 )

Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Income (loss) before accounting change $ 9.9 $ (42.7 )
Interest on convertible notes, net of tax 1.2 —

Diluted income (loss) before accounting change $ 11.1 $ (42.7 )
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding 33.158 26.778

Income (loss) per share before accounting change $ 0.34 $ (1.59 )

Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax $ (90.4 ) NA
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding 33.158 NA

Per share cumulative effect of accounting change $ (2.73 ) NA

Net loss $ (80.5 ) $ (42.7 )
Interest on convertible notes, net of tax 1.2 —

Diluted net loss $ (79.3 ) $ (42.7 )
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding 33.158 26.778

Net loss per share $ (2.39 ) $ (1.59 )


	Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended
	June 30,					June 30,
		2005		2004			2005			2004

Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Income (loss) before accounting change	$	17.4	$	(1.7	)	$	27.3		$	(44.4	)
Weighted average shares outstanding		27.200		26.818			27.173			26.798

Income (loss) per share before accounting change	$	0.64	$	(0.06	)	$	1.01		$	(1.66	)


Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax	NA		NA			$	(90.4	)	NA
Weighted average shares outstanding	NA		NA				27.173		NA

Per share cumulative effect of accounting change	NA		NA			$	(3.33	)	NA


Net income (loss)	$	17.4	$	(1.7	)	$	(63.1	)	$	(44.4	)
Weighted average shares outstanding		27.200		26.818			27.173			26.798

Net income (loss) per share	$	0.64	$	(0.06	)	$	(2.32	)	$	(1.66	)


Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Income (loss) before accounting change	$	17.4	$	(1.7	)	$	27.3		$	(44.4	)
Interest on convertible notes, net of tax		1.3		—			2.5			—

Diluted income (loss) before accounting change	$	18.7	$	(1.7	)	$	29.8		$	(44.4	)
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding		33.273		26.818			33.256			26.798

Income (loss) per share before accounting change	$	0.56	$	(0.06	)	$	0.90		$	(1.66	)


Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax	NA		NA			$	(90.4	)	NA
Weighted average shares outstanding	NA		NA				33.256		NA

Per share cumulative effect of accounting change	NA		NA			$	(2.72	)	NA


Net income (loss)	$	17.4	$	(1.7	)	$	(63.1	)	$	(44.4	)
Interest on convertible notes, net of tax		1.3		—			2.5			—

Diluted net income (loss)	$	18.7	$	(1.7	)	$	(60.6	)	$	(44.4	)
Weighted average shares outstanding		33.273		26.818			33.256			26.798

Net income (loss) per share	$	0.56	$	(0.06	)	$	(1.82	)	$	(1.66	)

Note ~~10.~~9. Operating Segment Information

Operating segment information for Alaska and Horizon for the ~~three-month period~~three and six month periods ended ~~March 31~~June 30 was as follows (in millions):


							Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	Three Months Ended March 31,						June 30,						June 30,
	2005			2004			2005			2004			2005			2004

Operating revenues:
Alaska	$	523.3		$	491.3		$	616.3		$	577.6		$	1,139.6		$	1,068.9
Horizon		121.2			110.3			140.6			124.7			261.8			235.0
Other*								0.2			0.2			0.5			0.5
Elimination of intercompany revenues		(2.0	)		(3.6	)		(0.6	)		(1.2	)		(2.9	)		(5.1	)

Consolidated	$	642.5		$	598.0		$	756.5		$	701.3		$	1,399.0		$	1,299.3

Income (loss) before income tax and accounting change:
Alaska	$	15.4		$	(53.2	)	$	22.1		$	(2.8	)	$	37.5		$	(56.0	)
Horizon		4.6			(10.4	)		11.1			4.7			15.7			(5.7	)
Other*		(3.0	)		(2.6	)		(3.5	)		(2.6	)		(6.5	)		(5.2	)

Consolidated	$	17.0		$	(66.2	)	$	29.7		$	(0.7	)	$	46.7		$	(66.9	)

Total assets at end of period:
Alaska	$	3,062.0		$	3,185.8								$	3,105.8		$	3,144.8
Horizon		342.4			317.0									325.9			290.7
Other*		760.0			854.7									774.6			809.2
Elimination of intercompany accounts		(863.8	)		(958.2	)								(835.8	)		(882.7	)

Consolidated	$	3,300.6		$	3,399.3								$	3,370.5		$	3,362.0

* Includes the parent company, Alaska Air Group, Inc., including its investments in Alaska and Horizon, which are eliminated in consolidation.


*		Includes the parent company, Alaska Air Group, Inc, including its investments in Alaska and Horizon, which are eliminated in consolidation.

Note ~~11. Long-term~~10. Long-Term Debt and Capital Lease Obligations

At ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, long-term debt and capital lease obligations were as follows (in millions):


							June 30, 2005			December 31, 2004
	2005			2004

Fixed rate notes payable due through 2015	$	357.7		$	361.3
Variable rate notes payable due through 2018		526.4			531.2
Fixed rate notes payable due through 2020							$	536.4		$	361.3
Variable rate notes payable due through 2020								349.8			531.2
Senior convertible notes due through 2023		150.0			150.0			150.0			150.0

Long-term debt		1,034.1			1,042.5			1,036.2			1,042.5
Capital lease obligations		0.3			0.5			0.3			0.5
Less current portion		(54.0	)		(53.4	)		(57.0	)		(53.4	)

	$	980.4		$	989.6		$	979.5		$	989.6

1718

During the first six months of 2005, Horizon issued $20.0 million of debt secured by flight equipment, having a fixed interest rate of 6.07% and a fifteen-year term.

During 2004, Alaska repaid its $150 million credit facility and, on December 23, 2004, that facility expired. On March 25, 2005, Alaska Airlines, Inc. finalized a $160 million variable rate credit facility with a syndicate of financial institutions that will expire in March 2008. The interest rate on the credit facility varies depending on certain financial ratios specified in the agreement with a minimum interest rate of LIBOR plus 200 basis points. Any borrowings will be secured by either aircraft or cash collateral. This credit facility contains contractual restrictions and requires maintenance of specific levels of net worth, maintenance of certain debt and leases to net worth, leverage and fixed charge coverage ratios, and limits on liens, asset dispositions, dividends, and certain other expenditures. Such provisions restrict Alaska Airlines from distributing any funds to Alaska Air Group in the form of dividends and limit the amount of funds Alaska Airlines can loan to Alaska Air Group. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005, $300.0 million was available to loan to Alaska Air Group without violating the covenants in the credit facility. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005, there are no outstanding borrowings on this credit facility.

~~Holders~~

In the second quarter of 2005, the Company exercised its option under several of its existing variable rate long-term debt arrangements to fix the interest rates through maturity. The fixed rates on these affected debt arrangements range from 5.2% to 6.3%. These changes did not result in any gain or loss in the consolidated statements of operations.

Note 11. Aircraft Commitments

Alaska entered into an aircraft purchase agreement during the second quarter of 2005 to acquire 35 B737-800 aircraft with deliveries beginning in January 2006 and continuing through April 2011. The purchase agreement also includes options to purchase an additional 15 aircraft. Concurrent with the execution of this purchase agreement, Alaska paid $110.9 million in aircraft purchase and option deposits using cash and a credit of $9.7 million received from the manufacturer. The $9.7 million credit has been deferred as other liabilities in the Company’s ~~$150.0 million senior convertible notes due in 2023 (Notes) may elect~~balance sheet and will be applied to ~~surrender~~ the ~~Notes for conversion into shares of the Company’s common stock. The conversion~~purchase price of ~~the Notes is $26.00 through March 2008. Upon a conversion~~future aircraft upon delivery.

As of ~~the Notes, in lieu of delivering shares of the Company’s common stock,~~June 30, 2005, the Company ~~may elect to pay cash or a combination~~has firm purchase commitments for 44 aircraft requiring aggregate future payments of cash and the Company’s common stock for the Notes surrendered. The Company may also redeem all or a portion of the Notes in cash or common stock or a combination at any time on or after the third anniversary of the issuance of the Notes.approximately $1.4 billion. In addition ~~holders may redeem all or a portion of their Notes for cash on the 5~~^th~~, 10~~^th ~~and 15~~^th ~~anniversaries of the issuance of the Notes or upon the occurrence of a change of control or tax event at principal plus accrued interest.~~

~~Subsequent~~ to the ~~first quarter,~~15 options noted above, Horizon ~~financed a CRJ-700 that was purchased~~has options to purchase 11 Q400’s and 19 CRJ 700’s. Alaska and Horizon expect to finance the firm orders and, to the extent exercised, the option aircraft with ~~cash and delivered during the first quarter. The financing was completed with a $20 million~~leases, long-term debt ~~arrangement that has a fifteen year term and a fixed interest rate of 6.07%.~~

or internally generated cash.

Note 12. Contingencies
The Company’s former pilot contract provided that, if a negotiated agreement on the entire contract was not reached by December 15, 2004, ten contract issues plus wage rates would be submitted to an interest arbitrator. The arbitration became effective on May 1, 2005 and resulted in an average pilot wage reduction of approximately 26%, various work rule changes, and higher employee health care contributions. No changes were made to the pilots’ pension or profit sharing plans.
18

The Company is a party to routine ~~commercial and employment~~ litigation incidental to its business and with respect to which no material liability is expected. Management believes the ultimate disposition of these matters is not likely to materially affect the Company’s financial position or results of operations. However, this belief is based on management’s current understanding of the relevant law and facts; it is

subject to various contingencies, including the potential costs and risks associated with litigation and the actions of judges and juries.

In May 2005, the Air Line Pilots Association filed a lawsuit in federal district court in Seattle to overturn the current labor contract covering Alaska’s pilots as established by an arbitrator, which was effective May 1, 2005. In the unlikely event that the arbitrator’s decision is overturned, Alaska may be required to pay wages retroactively to May 1, 2005 as if the contract that existed prior to the arbitrator’s decision were still in effect. On July 21, 2005, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit. The ~~Company could potentially~~motion will be ~~responsible for environmental remediation costs primarily related to jet fuel and other petroleum contamination that occurs~~decided on evidence submitted or following oral argument. A decision is expected in the ~~normal course~~third quarter of ~~business at various owned or leased locations~~2005. At this time, the Company has no reason to believe that an unfavorable outcome is likely.

In March 2005, the Company filed a claim against the International Association of Machinists (IAM) seeking to compel arbitration of the dispute regarding the subcontracting of the Company’s ramp service operation in Seattle. In May 2005, the IAM filed a counter claim against the Company alleging that the Company violated the status quo and engaged in bad faith bargaining. On May 13, 2005, the Company announced that it had subcontracted the ramp service operation in Seattle, resulting in the immediate reduction of approximately 475 employees represented by the IAM. Shortly after this event, the IAM filed a motion for a preliminary injunction seeking to reverse the subcontracting by the Company. That motion was heard and denied by a federal court judge on June 2, 2005. The Company’s ~~system. The~~lawsuit and the IAM’s counterclaim are still pending in federal court. A discovery schedule and trial date have not yet been set. At this time, the Company has ~~established~~no reason to believe that an ~~accrual for estimated remediation costs for known contamination based on information currently available. The accrual was not significant at March 31, 2005.~~

unfavorable outcome is likely.

1920

Alaska Airlines Financial and Statistical Data ~~(unaudited)~~(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended March 31									Three Months Ended June 30									Six Months Ended June 30
							%									%									%
Financial Data (in millions):	2005			2004			Change			2005			2004			Change			2005			2004			Change
Operating Revenues:
Passenger	$	471.3		$	449.3			4.9		$	561.2		$	519.9			7.9	%	$	1,032.5		$	969.2			6.5	%
Freight and mail		19.3			17.7			9.0			23.9			23.1			3.5	%		43.2			40.8			5.9	%
Other — net		32.7			24.3			34.6			31.2			34.6			-9.8	%		63.9			58.9			8.5	%

Total Operating Revenues		523.3			491.3			6.5			616.3			577.6			6.7	%		1,139.6			1,068.9			6.6	%


Operating Expenses:
Wages and benefits		199.7			200.8			(0.5	)		182.0			203.7			-10.7	%		381.7			404.5			-5.6	%
Contracted services		27.8			23.1			20.3			31.6			29.4			7.5	%		59.4			52.5			13.1	%
Aircraft fuel		127.6			93.6			36.3			151.5			112.6			34.5	%		279.1			206.2			35.4	%
Aircraft maintenance		50.1			43.5			15.2			50.2			40.7			23.3	%		100.3			84.2			19.1	%
Aircraft rent		28.4			29.5			(3.7	)		29.3			27.9			5.0	%		57.7			57.4			0.5	%
Food and beverage service		10.9			11.2			(2.7	)		11.5			13.0			-11.5	%		22.4			24.2			-7.4	%
Other selling expenses and commissions		32.7			33.9			(3.5	)		31.2			31.3			-0.3	%		63.9			65.2			-2.0	%
Depreciation and amortization		30.3			32.8			(7.6	)		30.7			30.4			1.0	%		61.0			63.2			-3.5	%
Loss on sale of assets		—			0.8		NM
Landing fees and other rentals		40.6			33.2			22.3			40.5			35.3			14.7	%		81.1			68.5			18.4	%
Other		38.4			36.9			4.1			41.5			38.1			8.9	%		79.9			75.8			5.4	%
Restructuring charges, primarily write-off of Oakland leasehold improvements		7.4			—		NM
Restructuring charges											14.7			—		NM				22.1			—		NM
Impairment of aircraft and related spare parts											—			36.8		NM				—			36.8		NM

Total Operating Expenses		593.9			539.3			10.1			614.7			599.2			2.6	%		1,208.6			1,138.5			6.2	%


Operating Loss		(70.6	)		(48.0	)	NM
Operating Income (Loss)											1.6			(21.6	)	NM				(69.0	)		(69.6	)	NM


Interest income		6.3			5.3						7.6			6.3						13.9			11.6
Interest expense		(11.5	)		(10.8	)					(12.4	)		(10.7	)					(23.9	)		(21.5	)
Interest capitalized		0.7			0.1						1.2			0.2						1.9			0.3
Fuel hedging gains		93.4			0.4						23.9			22.8						117.3			23.3
Other — net		(2.9	)		(0.2	)					0.2			0.2						(2.7	)		(0.1	)

		86.0			(5.2	)					20.5			18.8						106.5			13.6


Income (Loss) Before Income Tax	$	15.4		$	(53.2	)	NM
Income (Loss) Before Income Tax and Accounting Change										$	22.1		$	(2.8	)	NM			$	37.5		$	(56.0	)	NM


Operating Statistics:
Revenue passengers (000)		3,851			3,592			7.2			4,232			4,116			2.8	%		8,083			7,707			4.9	%
RPMs (000,000)		3,897			3,580			8.9			4,317			4,104			5.2	%		8,214			7,684			6.9	%
ASMs (000,000)		5,370			5,178			3.7			5,543			5,635			-1.6	%		10,913			10,813			0.9	%
Passenger load factor		72.6	%		69.1	%	3.5 pts				77.9	%		72.8	%	5.1 pts				75.3	%		71.1	%	4.2 pts
Yield per passenger mile		12.09	¢		12.55	¢		(3.7	)		13.00¢			12.67¢			2.5	%		12.57¢			12.61¢			-0.3	%
Operating revenue per ASM		9.74	¢		9.49	¢		2.6			11.12¢			10.25¢			8.4	%		10.44¢			9.89¢			5.6	%
Operating expenses per ASM (a)		11.06	¢		10.42	¢		6.1			11.09¢			10.63¢			4.2	%		11.07¢			10.53¢			5.2	%
Operating expense per ASM excluding fuel and restructuring charges (a)		8.55	¢		8.61	¢		(0.7	)
Operating expense per ASM excluding fuel, impairment and restructuring charges(a)											8.09¢			7.98¢			1.4	%		8.31¢			8.28¢			0.4	%
Raw fuel cost per gallon (a)		155.6	¢		116.6	¢		33.4			179.5¢			131.6¢			36.4	%		167.7¢			124.4¢			34.8	%
GAAP fuel cost per gallon (a)		151.5	¢		112.9	¢		34.2			175.8¢			126.7¢			38.8	%		163.8¢			120.0¢			36.5	%
Economic fuel cost per gallon (a)		132.9	¢		112.9	¢		17.7			151.1¢			123.1¢			22.7	%		142.1¢			118.2¢			20.2	%
Fuel gallons (000,000)		84.2			82.9			1.6			86.2			88.9			-3.1	%		170.4			171.8			-0.8	%
Average number of employees		9,219			9,984			(7.7	)		9,144			10,255			-10.8	%		9,180			10,120			-9.3	%
Aircraft utilization (blk hrs/day)		10.7			10.4			2.9			10.7			11.1			-3.6	%		10.3			10.7			-3.7	%
Operating fleet at period-end		109			108			0.9			109			108			0.9	%		109			108			0.9	%


NM		= Not Meaningful

(a)		See Note A on Page 23.

~~NM = Not Meaningful~~

~~(a) See Note A on page 22.~~

2021

Horizon Air Financial and Statistical Data ~~(unaudited)~~(Unaudited)


	Quarter Ended March 31									Three Months Ended June 30									Six Months Ended June 30
							%									%									%
Financial Data (in millions):	2005			2004			Change			2005			2004			Change			2005			2004			Change
Operating Revenues:
Passenger	$	117.7		$	106.5			10.5		$	136.9		$	120.4			13.7	%	$	254.6		$	226.9			12.2	%
Freight and mail		1.0			0.9			11.1			0.9			1.1			-18.2	%		1.9			2.0			-5.0	%
Other — net		2.5			2.9			(13.8	)		2.8			3.2			-12.5	%		5.3			6.1			-13.1	%

Total Operating Revenues		121.2			110.3			9.9			140.6			124.7			12.8	%		261.8			235.0			11.4	%


Operating Expenses:
Wages and benefits		43.2			41.5			4.1			43.1			40.9			5.4	%		86.3			82.4			4.7	%
Contracted services		5.5			5.2			5.8			6.1			5.2			17.3	%		11.6			10.4			11.5	%
Aircraft fuel		19.1			14.2			34.5			23.7			16.0			48.1	%		42.8			30.2			41.7	%
Aircraft maintenance		11.1			7.3			52.1			8.1			9.4			-13.8	%		19.2			16.7			15.0	%
Aircraft rent		17.7			18.3			(3.3	)		17.6			19.1			-7.9	%		35.3			37.4			-5.6	%
Food and beverage service		0.6			0.4			50.0			0.6			0.6			0.0	%		1.2			1.0			20.0	%
Other selling expenses and commissions		6.7			6.5			3.1			7.3			6.7			9.0	%		14.0			13.2			6.1	%
Depreciation and amortization		3.6			3.0			20.0			4.3			3.3			30.3	%		7.9			6.3			25.4	%
Gain on sale of assets		(0.2	)		(0.4	)	NM
Landing fees and other rentals		11.8			9.9			19.2			11.7			10.3			13.6	%		23.5			20.2			16.3	%
Other		11.5			11.5			0.0			9.6			10.7			-10.3	%		20.9			21.8			-4.1	%
Impairment of F-28 aircraft and spare engines		—			2.4		NM
Impairment of aircraft and spare engines											—			0.4		NM				—			2.8		NM

Total Operating Expenses		130.6			119.8			9.0			132.1			122.6			7.7	%		262.7			242.4			8.4	%


Operating Income (Loss)		(9.4	)		(9.5	)	NM				8.5			2.1		NM				(0.9	)		(7.4	)	NM


Interest income		0.3			—						0.4			0.4						0.7			0.6
Interest expense		(1.2	)		(1.3	)					(1.5	)		(1.0	)					(2.7	)		(2.3	)
Interest capitalized		0.1			0.2						0.1			0.1						0.2			0.3
Fuel hedging gains		14.8			—						3.6			3.1						18.4			3.1
Other — net		—			0.2

		14.0			(0.9	)					2.6			2.6						16.6			1.7


Income (Loss) Before Income Tax	$	4.6		$	(10.4	)	NM			$	11.1		$	4.7		NM			$	15.7		$	(5.7	)	NM


Operating Statistics:
Revenue passengers (000)		1,475			1,267			16.4			1,638			1,454			12.7	%		3,113			2,721			14.4	%
RPMs (000,000)		540			450			20.0			620			535			15.9	%		1,160			985			17.8	%
ASMs (000,000)		782			692			13.0			849			792			7.2	%		1,631			1,484			9.9	%
Passenger load factor		69.0	%		65.0	%	4.0 pts				73.0	%		67.5	%	5.5 pts				71.1	%		66.4	%	4.7 pts
Yield per passenger mile		21.82	¢		23.67	¢		(7.8	)		22.08¢			22.50¢			-1.9	%		21.95¢			23.04¢			-4.7	%
Operating revenue per ASM		15.50	¢		15.94	¢		(2.8	)		16.57¢			15.75¢			5.2	%		16.05¢			15.84¢			1.3	%
Operating expenses per ASM (a)		16.69	¢		17.30	¢		(3.5	)		15.57¢			15.49¢			0.5	%		16.11¢			16.34¢			-1.4	%
Operating expense per ASM excluding fuel and impairment charges (a)		14.25	¢		14.91	¢		(4.4	)
Operating expense per ASM excluding fuel and impairment charges(a)											12.78¢			13.43¢			-4.9	%		13.48¢			14.12¢			-4.5	%
Raw fuel cost per gallon (a)		162.5	¢		121.7	¢		33.5			187.6¢			136.1¢			37.7	%		175.1¢			128.4¢			36.4	%
GAAP fuel cost per gallon (a)		158.5	¢		117.7	¢		34.7			183.7¢			131.1¢			40.2	%		171.9¢			124.3¢			38.3	%
Economic fuel cost per gallon (a)		137.7	¢		117.7	¢		17.0			158.9¢			127.1¢			25.0	%		149.0¢			122.8¢			21.3	%
Fuel gallons (000,000)		12.0			12.0			0.0			12.9			12.2			5.7	%		24.9			24.3			2.5	%
Average number of employees		3,363			3,344			0.6			3,414			3,414			0.0	%		3,389			3,379			0.3	%
Aircraft utilization (blk hrs/day)		8.4			7.7			9.1			8.5			8.4			1.4	%		8.9			8.0			11.3	%
Operating fleet at period-end		66			64			3.1			65			64			1.6	%		65			64			1.6	%


NM		= Not Meaningful

(a)		See Note A on Page 23.

~~NM = Not Meaningful~~

~~(a) See Note A on page 22.~~

2122

Note A:

Pursuant to Item 10 of Regulation S-K, we are providing disclosure of the reconciliation of reported non-GAAP financial measures to their most directly comparable financial measures reported on a GAAP basis. The non-GAAP financial measures provide management the ability to measure and monitor performance both with and without the cost of aircraft fuel (including the gains and losses associated with our fuel hedging program where appropriate), restructuring charges, and aircraft impairment charges. Because the cost and availability of aircraft fuel are subject to many economic and political factors beyond our control and we record changes in the fair value of our hedge portfolio in our income statement, it is our view that the measurement and monitoring of performance without fuel is important. In addition, we believe the disclosure of financial performance without impairment and restructuring charges is useful to investors. Finally, these non-GAAP financial measures are also more comparable to financial measures reported to the Department of Transportation by other major network airlines.

The following tables reconcile our non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures for both Alaska Airlines, Inc. and Horizon Air Industries, Inc.:


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
*Alaska Airlines, Inc.:*
($ in millions)	2005			2004			2005			2004
Unit cost reconciliations:
Operating expenses	$	614.7		$	599.2		$	1,208.6		$	1,138.5
ASMs (000,000)		5,543			5,635			10,913			10,813

Operating expenses per ASM		11.09¢			10.63¢			11.07¢			10.53¢


Operating expenses	$	614.7		$	599.2		$	1,208.6		$	1,138.5
Less: aircraft fuel		(151.5	)		(112.6	)		(279.1	)		(206.2	)
Less: restructuring charges		(14.7	)		—			(22.1	)		—
Less: impairment of aircraft		—			(36.8	)		—			(36.8	)

Operating expense excluding fuel, restructuring charges, and impairment charge	$	448.5		$	449.8		$	907.4		$	895.5
ASMs (000,000)		5,543			5,635			10,913			10,813

Operating expense per ASM excluding fuel, restructuring charges, and impairment charge		8.09¢			7.98¢			8.31¢			8.28¢


Reconciliation from GAAP pretax income (loss):
Pretax income (loss) reported GAAP amounts	$	22.1		$	(2.8	)	$	37.5		$	(56.0	)
Less: mark-to-market hedging gains included in nonoperating income (expense)		(2.6	)		(19.6	)		(80.3	)		(20.1	)
Add: restructuring charges		14.7			—			22.1			—
Add: impairment of aircraft and related spare parts		—			36.8			—			36.8

Pretax income (loss) excluding restructuring charges, impairment charge, government comp and mark-to-market hedging gains	$	34.2		$	14.4		$	(20.7	)	$	(39.3	)


	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2005						2004
	(in millions)			Cost/Gal			(in millions)			Cost/Gal

Fuel expense before hedge activities (“raw” or “into-plane” fuel cost)	$	154.7		$	1.80		$	117.0		$	1.32
Less: gains on settled hedges included in fuel expense		(3.2	)		(0.04	)		(4.4	)		(0.05	)

GAAP fuel expense	$	151.5		$	1.76		$	112.6		$	1.27
Less: gains on settled hedges included in nonoperating income (expense)		(21.3	)		(0.25	)		(3.2	)		(0.04	)

Economic fuel expense	$	130.2		$	1.51		$	109.4		$	1.23

Fuel gallons (000,000)		86.2						88.9


Mark-to-market gains (losses) included in non-operating income related to hedges that settle in future periods	$	2.6					$	19.6


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2005						2004
	(in millions)			Cost/Gal			(in millions)			Cost/Gal

Fuel expense before hedge activities (“raw” or “into-plane” fuel cost)	$	285.7		$	1.68		$	213.7		$	1.24
Less: gains on settled hedges included in fuel expense		(6.6	)		(0.04	)		(7.5	)		(0.04	)

GAAP fuel expense	$	279.1		$	1.64		$	206.2		$	1.20
Less: gains on settled hedges included in nonoperating income (expense)		(37.0	)		(0.22	)		(3.2	)		(0.02	)

Economic fuel expense	$	242.1		$	1.42		$	203.0		$	1.18

Fuel gallons (000,000)		170.4						171.8


Mark-to-market gains (losses) included in non-operating income related to hedges that settle in future periods	$	80.3					$	20.1

~~Alaska Airlines, Inc.:~~
~~($ in millions)~~

Three Months Ended March 31,
2005 2004
Unit cost reconciliations:

Operating expenses $ 593.9 $ 539.3
ASMs (000,000) 5,370 5,178

Operating expenses per ASM 11.06 ¢ 10.42 ¢

Operating expenses $ 593.9 $ 539.3
Less: aircraft fuel (127.6 ) (93.6 )
Less: restructuring charges (7.4 ) —

Operating expense excluding fuel & restructuring charges $ 458.9 $ 445.7
ASMs (000,000) 5,370 5,178

Operating expense per ASM excluding fuel 8.55 ¢ 8.61 ¢

Reconciliation from GAAP pre-tax income (loss):

Pretax income (loss) reported GAAP amounts $ 15.4 $ (53.2 )
Less: mark-to-market hedging gains included in nonoperating income (expense) (77.7 ) (0.4 )
Add: Restructuring charges 7.4 —

Pretax loss excluding restructuring charges and mark-to-market hedging gains $ (54.9 ) $ (53.6 )

~~Aircraft fuel reconciliations:~~

Three Months Ended March 31,
2005 2004
(in millions) Cost/Gal (in millions) Cost/Gal

Fuel expense before hedge activities (“raw” or “into-plane” fuel cost) $ 131.0 $ 1.56 $ 96.7 $ 1.17
Less: gains on settled hedges included in fuel expense (3.4 ) (0.04 ) (3.1 ) (0.04 )

GAAP fuel expense $ 127.6 $ 1.52 $ 93.6 $ 1.13
Less: gains on settled hedges included in nonoperating income (expense) (15.7 ) (0.19 ) — —

Economic fuel expense $ 111.9 $ 1.33 $ 93.6 $ 1.13

Fuel gallons (000,000) 84.2 82.9

Mark-to-market gains (losses) included in non-operating income related to hedges that settle in future periods $ 77.7 $ 0.4

2223


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
*Horizon Air Industries, Inc.*
($ in millions)	2005			2004			2005			2004
Unit cost reconciliations:
Operating expenses	$	132.1		$	122.6		$	262.7		$	242.4
ASMs (000,000)		849			792			1,631			1,484


Operating expenses per ASM		15.57¢			15.49¢			16.11¢			16.34¢

Operating expenses	$	132.1			$122.6		$	262.7		$	242.4
Less: aircraft fuel		(23.7	)		(16.0	)		(42.8	)		(30.2	)
Less: impairment of aircraft		—			(0.4	)		—			(2.8	)

Operating expense excluding fuel and impairment charge	$	108.4		$	106.2		$	219.9		$	209.4
ASMs (000,000)		849			792			1,631			1,484

Operating expense per ASM excluding fuel and impairment charge		12.78¢			13.43¢			13.48¢			14.12¢


Reconciliation from GAAP pretax income (loss):
Pretax income (loss) reported GAAP amounts	$	11.1		$	4.7		$	15.7		$	(5.7	)
Less: mark-to-market hedging gains included in nonoperating income (expense)		(0.4	)		(2.7	)		(12.7	)		(2.7	)
Add: impairment of aircraft and related spare parts		—			0.4			—			2.8

Pretax income (loss) excluding impairment charge and mark-to-market hedging gains	$	10.7		$	2.4		$	3.0		$	(5.6	)

Aircraft fuel reconciliations:


	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2005						2004
	(in millions)			Cost/Gal			(in millions)			Cost/Gal

Fuel expense before hedge activities (“raw” or “into-plane” fuel cost)	$	24.2		$	1.88		$	16.6		$	1.36
Less: gains on settled hedges included in fuel expense		(0.5	)		(0.04	)		(0.6	)		(0.05	)

GAAP fuel expense	$	23.7		$	1.84		$	16.0		$	1.31
Less: gains on settled hedges included in nonoperating income (expense)		(3.2	)		(0.25	)		(0.4	)		(0.03	)

Economic fuel expense	$	20.5		$	1.59		$	15.6		$	1.28

Fuel gallons (000,000)		12.9						12.2


Mark-to-market gains (losses) included in non-operating income related to hedges that settle in future periods	$	0.4					$	2.7


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2005						2004
	(in millions)			Cost/Gal			(in millions)			Cost/Gal
Fuel expense before hedge activities (“raw” or “into-plane” fuel cost)	$	43.6		$	1.75		$	31.2		$	1.28
Less: gains on settled hedges included in fuel expense		(0.8	)		(0.03	)		(1.0	)		(0.04	)

GAAP fuel expense	$	42.8		$	1.72		$	30.2		$	1.24
Less: gains on settled hedges included in nonoperating income (expense)		(5.7	)		(0.23	)		(0.4	)		(0.01	)

Economic fuel expense	$	37.1		$	1.49		$	29.8		$	1.23

Fuel gallons (000,000)		24.9						24.3


Mark-to-market gains (losses) included in non-operating income related to hedges that settle in future periods	$	12.7					$	2.7

~~Horizon Air Industries, Inc.~~
~~($ in millions)~~

Three Months Ended March 31,
Unit cost reconciliations: 2005 2004
Operating expenses $ 130.6 $ 119.8
ASMs (000,000) 782 692

Operating expenses per ASM 16.69 ¢ 17.30 ¢

Operating expenses $ 130.6 $ 119.8
Less: aircraft fuel (19.1 ) (14.2 )
Less: impairment of aircraft and spare engines — (2.4 )

Operating expenses excluding fuel and impairment charge $ 111.5 $ 103.2
ASMs (000,000) 782 692

Operating expenses per ASM excluding fuel and impairment charge 14.25 ¢ 14.91 ¢

Reconciliation from GAAP pre-tax income (loss):

Pretax income (loss) reported GAAP amounts $ 4.6 $ (10.4 )
Less: mark-to-market hedging gains included in nonoperating income (expense) (12.3 ) —
Add: impairment of aircraft and spare engines — 2.4

Pretax loss excluding impairment charge and mark-to-market hedging gains $ (7.7 ) $ (8.0 )

~~Aircraft fuel reconciliations:~~

Three Months Ended March 31,
2005 2004
(in millions) Cost/Gal (in millions) Cost/Gal

Fuel expense before hedge activities (“raw” or “into-plane” fuel cost) $ 19.5 $ 1.63 $ 14.6 $ 1.22
Less: gains on settled hedges included in fuel expense (0.4 ) (0.04 ) (0.4 ) (0.04 )

GAAP fuel expense $ 19.1 $ 1.59 $ 14.2 $ 1.18
Less: gains on settled hedges included in nonoperating income (expense) (2.5 ) (0.2 ) — —

Economic fuel expense $ 16.6 $ 1.38 $ 14.2 $ 1.18

Fuel gallons (000,000) 12.0 12.0

Mark-to-market gains included in non-operating income related to hedges that settle in future periods $ 12.3 —

2324

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes contained elsewhere in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. All statements in the following discussion that are not reports of historical information or descriptions of current accounting policy are forward-looking statements. Please consider our forward-looking statements in light of the risks referred to in this report’s introductory cautionary note.

Air Group’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports are accessible free of charge atwww.alaskaair.com. The information contained on our website is not a part of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. As used in this Form 10-Q, the terms “Air Group,” “our,” “we” and the “Company” refer to Alaska Air Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries, unless the context indicates otherwise.

~~First~~

Second Quarter in Review and Current Events

In the ~~first~~second quarter of 2005, despite nearly flat capacity, revenues continued to improve ~~over the first quarter of last year~~ due to ~~record~~increases in passenger traffic ~~and load factors~~ at both Alaska and ~~Horizon. Ticket yields, however, continued to decline year over year, although we began to see some~~Horizon, coupled with a modest improvement in ticket ~~prices in the latter part of the quarter. Operating expenses remain an area of focus.~~yields at Alaska over prior year. Operating expenses per available seat mile increased ~~6.1%~~4.2% at Alaska to ~~11.06~~11.09 cents and ~~decreased 3.5%~~0.5% at Horizon to ~~16.69~~15.57 cents compared to the ~~first~~second quarter of 2004. We continued to show improvement in our unit costs excluding fuel, impairment, and restructuring charges during the first quarter of 2005, although the rate of improvement slowed compared to recent quarters. Our cost per available seat mile excluding fuel, impairment, and restructuring charges declined 0.7% at Alaska to 8.55 cents and 4.4% at Horizon to 14.25 cents.

Fuel is a major component of our operating costs and fuel prices reached record highs once again in the ~~first~~second quarter. At Alaska, our unit costs excluding fuel, impairment, and restructuring charges during the second quarter of 2005 increased slightly compared to the second quarter of 2004. This is due to the reduction in capacity at Alaska from the prior year quarter due to the reduction of our 2005 summer flight schedule. Horizon, however, continued to see improvement in unit costs excluding fuel, impairment, and restructuring charges over the prior period. Our cost per available seat mile excluding fuel, impairment, and restructuring charges increased 1.4% at Alaska to 8.09 cents and declined 4.9% at Horizon to 12.78 cents compared to the second quarter of 2004.

Although revenues and pretax income at Alaska have improved over the prior year, we are facing several operational difficulties due to the combined effects of the recent labor and operational changes across our company. The result has been operational performance that is well below our goal. Our operational performance, measured by on-time arrivals and departures, declined significantly from the ~~first~~second quarter of 2004. In order to improve our operational performance, we ~~have recently~~ reduced our capacity throughout the remainder of 2005 from our original ~~expectations.~~

~~Accounting Change~~

~~Effective January 1, 2005, we changed~~expectations through schedule reductions and the elimination of certain flights. This capacity reduction will impact our ~~method of accounting for major airframe and engine overhauls from the~~~~capitalize and amortize~~~~method to the~~~~direct expense~~~~method. Accordingly, effective January 1, 2005, we wrote off the net book value of our~~

previously capitalized airframe and engine overhauls for all aircraft in a charge totaling $144.7 million pre-tax ($90.4 million after tax). See Note 2 to our condensed consolidated financial statements for further details.

~~Restructuring Charges~~

~~Asset impairment and rental charges of $8.0 million related to our decision to terminate the lease at our Oakland heavy maintenance base were recorded~~revenue in the ~~first quarter of 2005. During~~third and fourth quarters, although the third quarter of 2004, Alaska announced a management reorganization and the closure of its Oakland heavy maintenance base, contracting out of related heavy maintenance, contracting out of the Company’s fleet service, ground support equipment and facility maintenance functions, maintenance shops and other initiatives. In total, we believe these restructuring activities will result in a reduction of approximately 900 employees when fully implemented through the first half of 2005. Severance and related costs associated withimpact is not known at this restructuring were estimated and recorded at $53.4 million in 2004. Cash paid during the first quarter of 2005 was $20.3 million and an adjustment of $0.6 million was recorded to reduce the estimated accrual for related medical benefits. We expect savings from these job-related initiatives to be approximately $35 million per year when fully implemented.

As part of our ongoing cost saving initiatives, we continue to look at all aspects of our business. In the remainder of 2005, we may contract out other activities or initiate other restructuring activities which would result in further restructuring charges.

time.

Labor Costs and Negotiations

Despite ongoing negotiations in late 2003 and much of 2004, we were unable to reach a new agreement with the Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA) and, therefore, pursuant to the terms of the collective bargaining agreement, submitted to binding arbitration during the first quarter of 2005, the

decision of which became effective on May 1, 2005. The arbitration resulted in an average pilot wage reduction of approximately 26%, various work rule changes ~~which~~that should result in productivity improvements, and higher employee health care contributions. No changes were made to the pilots’ pension orplan. Subsequent to the arbitrator’s decision, the Company and ALPA reached a tentative agreement that, among other things, provided an across-the-board 20% reduction of pilot’s wages rather than the average 26% reduction from the arbitrator’s decision and a number of work rule changes. The pilot group rejected this agreement on July 11, 2005 and, therefore, the contract resulting from the arbitrator’s decision will stand and will become amendable on May 1, 2007. We have reached a tentative agreement with ALPA to resolve certain aspects of the current contract such as vacation and training pay, health care and profit ~~sharing plans.~~

~~We continue~~sharing. ALPA filed a lawsuit in federal district court to ~~pursue~~vacate the ~~restructuring~~arbitrator’s decision. At this time, the Company has no reason to believe that an unfavorable outcome is likely (See Part II: Other Information – Item 1: Legal Proceedings).

During the second quarter of ~~our other labor agreements so that they are in line with what~~2005, we ~~believe to be market. Our objectives as we restructure these agreements are to achieve market labor costs, productivity and employee benefit costs. For example, we recently~~ presented a contract offer to the International Association of Machinists (IAM, representing our ramp workers) ~~and believe~~ that was rejected by this work group is in the process of voting on our offer. The offer, as presented, includes a generous voluntary severance package (similar to that used with our mechanics in Oakland and the voluntary management reductions), wage reductions, and work

~~rule changes. If we are unable to reach an agreement with the IAM, we will consider subcontracting~~group. We subcontracted our Seattle ramp operations to a third party effective May 13, 2005. This resulted in an immediate reduction of approximately 475 employees. We offered a severance package, substantially the same as the severance packages offered to other employees in late 2004, to those affected by the subcontracting that included cash payments based on years of service, one year of medical coverage after the severance date and continued travel benefits for a period of time. The IAM accepted the severance package in June 2005 and, as a result, we recorded a charge of $16.1 million in the second quarter of 2005 related to the restructuring, which was offset by a $1.4 million adjustment related to the remaining restructuring liability from our prior restructuring efforts, resulting in a net restructuring charge of $14.7 million. The IAM has filed a lawsuit in federal court alleging a violation of the status quo and that we engaged in bad faith bargaining. At this time, the Company has no reason to believe that an unfavorable outcome is likely (See Part II: Other Information – Item 1: Legal Proceedings).

A tentative agreement with the Association of Flight Attendants (AFA) was rejected by the majority of Alaska’s flight attendants on July 19, 2005. A tentative agreement with the Aircraft Mechanics Fraternal Association (AMFA) was rejected by the majority of Alaska’s aircraft technicians on July 27, 2005. The Company will resume talks with the AFA and AMFA soon to determine next steps in these processes.

Although we are disappointed that we have not been able to secure contracts with IAM, AFA, or AMFA thus far, we believe the negotiations to date have been productive. None of the contract negotiations is at an impasse or has reached the 30 day cooling off period required under the Railway Labor Act that would trigger self help. Therefore, we currently believe the risk of a work stoppage or other material service disruption in the near future. During the first quarter of 2005, we executed an agreement with a third party that would provide ramp operations in Seattle if we are unable to reach a negotiated agreement. Additionally, Horizon continues to be in negotiations with the American Mechanics Fratnernal Association (AMFA, representing our mechanics and related classifications) using the services of a mediator from the National Mediation Board.future is very low.

Mark-to-Market Fuel Hedging Gains

Beginning in the second quarter of 2004, we lost the ability to defer, as a component of comprehensive income, recognition of any unrealized gain or loss on our fuel hedge contracts until the hedged fuel is consumed. We lost this ability because the price correlation between crude oil, the commodity we use to hedge, and West Coast jet fuel fell below required thresholds. For more discussion, see Note 54 to our condensed consolidated financial statements.

The implications of this change are twofold: First, our earnings ~~are~~can be more volatile as we mark our entire hedge portfolio to market each quarter-end and report the gain or loss in other non-operating income or expense, even though the actual consumption will take place in a future period. In times of rising fuel prices such as the ~~first~~second quarter of 2005, this will have the effect of increasing our reported net income or decreasing our reported net loss. Our mark-to-market gains recorded in the ~~first~~second quarter of 2005 for contracts that settle in future periods were ~~$90.0~~$3.0 million compared to ~~$0.4~~$22.3 million in the ~~first~~second quarter of 2004. Second, to a large extent, the impact of our fuel hedge program will not be reflected in fuel expense. In the ~~first~~second quarter of 2005, we recorded gains from settled fuel hedges totaling ~~$22.0~~$28.2 million, but only ~~$3.8~~$3.7 million of that gain is reflected as an offset to fuel expense with the balance reported in other non-operating income. In the ~~first~~second quarter of 2004, gains of ~~$3.5~~$5.0 million on settled hedges were recorded as an offset to fuel expense and ~~there~~gains of $3.6 million were ~~no gains~~ recorded in non-operating income related to settled hedges.

We have provided information on mark-to-market gains or losses, as well as calculations of our economic fuel cost per gallon on pages 2123 and ~~22.~~

24.

We continue to believe that our fuel hedge program is an important part of our strategy to reduce our exposure to volatile fuel prices.

~~Frontier JetExpress~~Impairment of 737-200C Aircraft in 2004

On January 1, 2004, Horizon began operating regional jet service branded as Frontier JetExpress under a 12-year agreement with Frontier Airlines. Service under this agreement became fully operational during

In the second quarter of 2004, our Board approved a plan to accelerate the retirement of our Boeing 737-200C fleet and ~~Horizon is currently operating nine regional jet~~remove those aircraft from service earlier than initially planned. As a result of this decision, we recorded an impairment charge totaling $36.8 million (pretax) to write down the fleet to its estimated fair market value.

Aircraft Commitment

On June 15, 2005, Alaska Airlines, Inc. entered into an aircraft purchase agreement with The Boeing Company to purchase 35 B737-800 aircraft with deliveries beginning in January 2006 and continuing through April 2011. The purchase agreement includes options to purchase an additional 15 aircraft with deliveries between July 2007 and April 2009. The order also includes rights to purchase an additional 50 737-800s under the ~~Frontier JetExpress brand. Flying under this agreement represented 16.2% of Horizon’s capacity and 7.4% of passenger revenues for~~same terms as the ~~quarter ended March 31, 2004. For~~

agreement.

the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (which is more representative of ongoing operations), flying under this agreement represented 23.0% of Horizon’s first quarter capacity and 10.0% of passenger revenue.

The arrangement with Frontier provides for reimbursement of costs plus a base mark-up and certain incentives. However, since Horizon is not responsible for many of the typical costs of operations such as fuel, landing fees, marketing costs and station labor and rents and combined with longer trip lengths, revenue per available seat mile (ASM), and cost per ASM for this flying is significantly lower than Horizon’s native network flying.

Capacity Outlook

For 2005, Alaska and Horizon expect capacity ~~increases of slightly under 2%~~to be flat and up approximately ~~12%~~10%, respectively, ~~over~~compared to 2004 capacity. We ~~have~~ recently reduced the estimated capacity ~~increase~~forecast for the remainder of

the year for Alaska ~~because of~~due to schedule reductions that are being made to improve operational reliability. The expected capacity increase at Alaska is due largely to the annualization of the additional seats added to the B737-400 fleet during the fourth quarter of 2004 and the addition of three B737-800s, two of which were added in the first quarter of 2005, offset by the retirement of two B737-200s in 2004. Horizon’s expected capacity increase is due largely to the annualization of aircraft additions in the ~~first~~last half of 2004, the addition of one new CRJ-700 in the first quarter of 2005, and higher utilization resulting from the annualization of the contract flying for Frontier. In addition, Horizon has completed the addition of a row of seats to the Q400 fleet increasing capacity from 70 to 74 seats. ~~When complete, this will result in an increase of approximately 1.5% in available seat miles on an annualized basis.~~

~~During the first quarter of 2005, we announced~~

We expect to begin service to Dallas/Fort Worth in September 2005. During the second quarter, we announced service from Los Angeles to Mexico City beginning in ~~July~~August 2005.

~~RESULTS OF OPERATIONS~~

Results of Operations

Comparison of Three Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005 to Three Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2004

Our consolidated net ~~loss~~income for the ~~first~~second quarter of 2005 was ~~$80.5~~$17.4 million, or ~~$2.39~~$0.56 per diluted share, versus a net loss of ~~$42.7~~$1.7 million, or ~~$1.59~~$0.06 per diluted share, in the ~~first~~second quarter of 2004.

Our consolidated operating ~~loss~~income for the ~~first~~second quarter of 2005 was ~~$80.9~~$9.1 million compared to aan operating loss of ~~$58.5~~$20.6 million during the same period of 2004. Our consolidated pre-tax net income ~~before the accounting change~~ for the quarter was ~~$17.0~~$29.7 million compared to a pre-tax loss of ~~$66.2~~$0.7 million for the ~~first~~second quarter of 2004. ~~The~~Both the 2005 and 2004 results include certain significant items that impact the comparability ~~to 2004.~~of the quarters. These items are discussed in the ~~“First~~“Second Quarter in Review and Current Events” section beginning on page ~~23.~~ 25. Excluding those items, the quarter over quarter improvement can be characterized by higher revenues, offset by significantly higher fuel costs and relatively flat operating expenses. Wages and benefits declined significantly due to some of the recent initiatives and new pilot contract at Alaska. However, these declines were largely offset by higher operating expenses in other areas.

Financial and statistical data comparisons for Alaska and Horizon are shown on pages 1921 and ~~20,~~22, respectively. On pages 2123 and ~~22,~~24, we have included a reconciliation of reported non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures.

Alaska Airlines Revenues

Operating revenues increased ~~$32.0~~$38.7 million, or ~~6.5%~~6.7%, during the ~~first~~second quarter of 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004. For the quarter, revenue passenger miles (RPMs or traffic) increased 5.2% over prior year and ticket yields per passenger mile increased approximately 2.5%. The increase in ~~revenues resulted from an 8.9%~~yield per passenger mile was a result of a modest increase in ~~passenger traffic,~~ticket prices industry-wide designed to offset higher fuel prices.

Our operating revenues per available seat mile (ASM) increased by 8.4% compared to the prior year driven primarily by the increase in ticket yields as discussed above and a ~~3.7%~~1.6% decline in ~~ticket yields. For the three months ended March 31, 2005, capacity increased 3.7% as compared to 2004.~~ASMs. The capacity ~~increases~~decreases are primarily due to the ~~annualization~~reduction in our flight schedule that was announced in June 2005 and the retirement of two B737-200s in 2004, offset by the additional seats added to the B737-400 fleet during the fourth quarter of 2004 and the addition of two B737-800s in the first quarter of ~~2005, partially~~2005. The increase in traffic offset by the ~~retirement of two B737-200s in 2004. The traffic increase of 8.9% outpaced the~~ capacity ~~increase of 3.7%, resulting~~decrease, resulted in an increase in load factor

from ~~69.1%~~72.8% to ~~72.6%~~77.9%. The decline in yield per passenger mile was a result of continued industry-wide pricing pressure, dropping 3.7% compared to the first quarter of 2004, although yields improved as the quarter progressed. We expect that load factors will continue to be strong and that yields and passenger unit revenues will ~~begin~~continue to ~~stabilize or~~ trend slightly higher through the ~~second quarter~~remainder of 2005.

Freight and mail revenues increased ~~$1.6~~$0.8 million, or ~~9.0%~~3.5%, compared to the same period in 2004 because of a relatively new mail contract we have in the State of Alaska offset by lower freight revenues.

Other-net revenues ~~increased $8.4~~decreased $3.4 million, or ~~34.6%~~9.8%, due ~~largely~~ to ~~an increase~~the termination of contract maintenance work that we were performing for third parties in the second quarter of 2004 and are no longer performing. This was offset by increases in Mileage Plan revenues, resulting from higher award redemption on our partner airlines and an increase in cash receipts from miles ~~sold, and, to a lesser extent, higher revenues from our contract flying with PenAir which started in January 2004.~~

sold.

Alaska Airlines Expenses

For the ~~three months ended March 31, 2005,~~quarter, total operating expenses increased ~~$54.6~~$15.5 million, or ~~10.1%~~2.6%, as compared to the same period in ~~2004.~~2004 despite a 1.6% decrease in capacity. Operating expenses per ASM increased ~~6.1%~~4.2% from ~~10.42~~10.63 cents in the ~~first~~second quarter of 2004 to ~~11.06~~11.09 cents in the ~~first~~second quarter of 2005. The increase in operating expenses ~~per ASM~~ is due largely to the significant increases in fuel costs, the restructuring charge related to the subcontracting of the ramp services operation in Seattle, contracted services costs, aircraft maintenance, and landing fees and other ~~rental costs,~~rentals, offset by a decline in ~~depreciation~~wages and ~~amortization, aircraft rent,~~benefits and ~~other selling expenses~~food and ~~commissions.~~beverage service. Operating expense per ASM excluding fuel, restructuring and ~~restructuring~~impairment charges ~~decreased by 0.7% to 8.55 cents per ASM~~increased 1.4% as compared to ~~8.61 cents per ASM~~the same period in 2004. ~~Excluding any benefit from labor cost reductions, our~~Our estimates of costs per ASM, excluding fuel and restructuring or impairment charges, for the ~~second quarter,~~ third quarter, fourth quarter and full year of 2005 are ~~7.85~~7.4 cents, ~~7.20 cents, 7.80~~7.4 cents, and between ~~7.80~~7.8 and ~~7.85~~7.9 cents, respectively. ~~We are evaluating the impact of the pilot arbitration results and expect to provide updated cost estimates in May.~~

Explanations of significant period-over-period changes in the components of operating expenses are as follows:

•

Wages and benefits ~~remained relatively flat, decreasing $1.1~~decreased $21.7 million, or ~~0.5%~~10.7%, during the ~~first quarter of 2005.~~second quarter. Wages ~~were~~have been favorably impacted by the restructuring initiatives

announced in August and September of 2004 ~~largely offset by an increase~~and the reduction in pilot wages ~~a new performance-based incentive program for all employees, and an increase~~resulting from the arbitrator’s decision in ~~medical and pension benefits. During~~May 2005. Additionally, during the ~~first~~second quarter of 2005, ~~there~~we subcontracted our ramp services operation in Seattle. We expect a greater year-over-year decline in wages in the third quarter of 2005 as we see the full effect of some of these changes, with the increase tapering down as we get into the fourth quarter. We estimate that wages and benefits will decline approximately $34 million, or 16%, in the third quarter and $19 million, or 10% in the fourth quarter as compared to the same periods in 2004 as we complete a full year under some of the restructuring changes that were ~~9,219 full-time equivalents (FTEs), which is down~~made in the fourth quarter of the prior year. The period over period declines in wages and benefits are partially offset by ~~765 FTEs from 2004 on a 3.7% increase~~increases in ~~capacity.~~contracted services and maintenance expense due to the subcontracting of certain operations.

• Contracted services increased ~~$4.7~~$2.2 million, or ~~20.3%~~7.5%, due largely to the contracting out of the Company’s fleet service and ground service equipment and facility maintenance ~~and costs associated with~~in the ~~service to Dutch Harbor, Alaska, which was contracted to PenAir in January~~

			fourth quarter of 2004, and ~~grew through~~ the ~~first~~Seattle ramp operations in the second quarter of ~~2004.~~2005. We expect a larger increase from prior year in the third and fourth quarters due to the ramp service operations being subcontracted for the full quarters.

	•		Aircraft fuel increased ~~$34.0~~$38.9 million, or ~~36.3%~~34.5%, due to a ~~34.2%~~38.8% increase in the GAAP fuel cost per gallon, ~~and~~offset by a ~~1.6% increase~~3.1% decrease in fuel gallons consumed. The increase in aircraft fuel expense is inclusive of ~~$3.4~~$3.2 million of gains from settled hedges. During the ~~first~~second quarter of 2005, Alaska also realized ~~$15.7~~$21.3 million of ~~hedge~~ gains from settled hedges, which are recorded in other non-operating income. After including all ~~hedge~~ gains on settled hedges recorded during the quarter, our “economic,” or net, fuel expense increased ~~$18.3~~$20.8 million, or ~~19.6%~~19.0%, over the same period in 2004. Our economic fuel cost per gallon increased ~~17.7%~~22.7% over the ~~first~~second quarter of 2004 from ~~$1.13~~$1.23 to ~~$1.33.~~$1.51. At current market prices, we expect that the cost per gallon in the third and fourth quarters will meet or exceed second quarter levels.

			See page 2123 for a table summarizing fuel cost per gallon realized by Alaska (the economic cost per gallon), the cost per gallon on a GAAP basis (including hedging gains recorded in aircraft fuel and non-operating income (expense)) and fuel cost per gallon excluding all hedging activities.

	•		Aircraft maintenance increased ~~$6.6~~$9.5 million, or ~~15.2%~~23.3%, due largely to our power-by-the-hour maintenance agreement, whereby we expense B737-400 engine maintenance on a ~~block-hour~~flight-hour basis, regardless of whether the work was actually performed during the period. Other factors causing the increase were the contracting out of related heavy maintenance to third parties, which resulted in a shift of costs from wages and benefits into aircraft maintenance, more airframe work and engine overhauls in 2005 compared to 2004, and the change in our accounting policy regarding engine and airframe overhauls (see Note 2 to our condensed consolidated financial statements). ~~Our current expectation is~~We expect that ~~aircraft~~ maintenance ~~costs~~expense will be ~~up approximately $3.0~~higher by $15 million ~~in the second quarter, $9.0~~and $6 million in the third ~~quarter,~~ and ~~$4.0 million in the~~ fourth ~~quarter~~quarters of 2005, respectively, compared to the ~~prior year periods.~~same periods in 2004 as a result of the factors above and our decision to move the timing of some maintenance activities up from 2006.

	•		Aircraft rent ~~decreased $1.1~~increased $1.4 million, or ~~3.7%~~5.0%, due to the additional operating lease on a B737-800 that was delivered in March 2005, offset by lower rates on extended leases.

• ~~Other selling expenses and commissions decreased $1.2 million, or 3.5%, due to a decline in advertising expense, offset by increases in commissions and codeshare fees.~~

• ~~Depreciation~~ Food and ~~amortization~~beverage service expense decreased ~~$2.5~~$1.5 million, or ~~7.6%. The first quarter of 2004 included accelerated depreciation~~11.5%, due primarily to increased focus on the planned retirement of three Boeing 737-200Cs. In the second quarter of 2004, we recorded an impairment charge of $36.8 million to reduce the carrying value of the Boeing 737-200C fleet, which resultscost reduction resulting in ~~lower depreciation expense~~a decrease in ~~future periods.~~average food and beverage cost per passenger.

• Landing fees and other rentals increased ~~$7.4~~$5.2 million, or ~~22.3%.~~14.7% despite a decrease in the number of departures. The higher rates reflect increased rental costs, primarily ~~reflect higher joint-use fees~~ in Seattle, Portland and Los ~~Angeles and exclusive rental fees at Seattle and Anchorage (including a $1.3 million adjustment in 2005 from the Port of Seattle related to 2004), combined with modest volume growth.~~Angeles. We expect landing fees and other rentals to continue to increase

			by 10% to 15% in the third and fourth quarters compared to 2004 as a result of airport facility expansions and ~~increased~~higher costs ~~for security due~~related to ~~unfunded government mandates.~~airport security.

	•		Other expense increased ~~$1.5~~$3.4 million, or ~~4.1%~~8.9%, primarily reflecting increases in passenger remuneration costs, professional services costs, legal settlement costs and personnel and crew ~~costs, passenger remuneration costs, and supplies~~ costs.

Horizon Air Revenues

For the ~~first~~second quarter, ~~of 2005,~~ operating revenues increased ~~$10.9~~$15.9 million, or ~~9.9%~~12.8% as compared to 2004. This increase is due largely to ~~the~~ increased traffic in ~~our~~the native network, ~~and our contract flying for Frontier Airlines, which began in January 2004,~~ partially offset by a ~~7.8%~~1.9% decline in ticket yields.

For the three months ~~ended March 31,~~ending June 30, 2005, capacity increased ~~13.0%~~7.2% and traffic was up ~~20.0%~~15.9%, compared to the same period in ~~2004. Contract flying with Frontier represented approximately 10.0%~~2004 due primarily to the addition of ~~passenger revenues~~one CRJ 700, four additional seats on each of our Q400’s and ~~23.0% of capacity, during~~an increase in the ~~first quarter of 2005. Passenger load factor increased 4.0 percentage points to 69.0%.~~average trip length. Passenger yield decreased ~~7.8%~~1.9% to ~~21.82~~22.08 cents ~~reflecting~~per passenger mile due primarily to an increase in average trip lengths across the ~~inclusion of the Frontier contract flying, the yield for which is significantly lower than~~ native network, ~~flying.~~partially as a result of increased harmonization flying with Alaska. Passenger revenues increased by ~~$11.2~~$16.5 million, or ~~10.5%~~13.7%, due primarily to the increase in traffic resulting from increased harmonization flying with Alaska and ~~the increase~~ in ~~Frontier contract flying.~~

our native network.

Horizon Air Expenses

Operating expenses increased ~~$10.8~~$9.5 million, or ~~9.0%~~7.7%, as compared to the same period in 2004. Operating expenses per ASM ~~decreased 3.5%~~increased 0.5% as compared to ~~2004 from 17.30 cents in the first quarter of 2004 to 16.69 cents in the first quarter of 2005.~~2004. Operating expenses per ASM excluding

fuel and impairment charges decreased ~~4.4%~~4.9% as compared to the same period in 2004. Operating expenses in 2004 include ~~$2.4~~$0.4 million related to an impairment charge on our held-for-sale F-28 aircraft and spare engines to lower the carrying value of these assets to their estimated fair value. Our estimates of costs per ASM, excluding fuel and special charges, for the ~~second quarter,~~ third quarter, fourth quarter and full year of 2005 are 12.2 cents, 13.6 cents, and 13.2 cents, ~~12.0 cents, 12.8 cents and 13.0 cents,~~ respectively.

Explanations of other significant period-over-period changes in the components of operating expenses are as follows:

	•		Wages and benefits increased ~~$1.7~~$2.2 million, or ~~4.1%~~5.4%, reflecting a slight increase in the average ~~number of employees, wages~~wage per employee and a new performance-based incentive program for all employees, partially offset by ~~favorable reductions of medical and~~lower workers compensation ~~accruals.~~expense based on favorable claims activity.

	•		Aircraft fuel increased ~~$4.9~~$7.7 million, or ~~34.5%~~48.1%, due to a ~~34.7%~~40.2% increase in the GAAP fuel cost per gallon from ~~$1.18~~$1.31 in 2004 to ~~$1.59~~$1.84 in ~~2005.~~2005 and a 5.7% increase in fuel gallons consumed. The increase in aircraft fuel expense is inclusive of ~~$0.4~~$0.5 million of gains from settled hedges. During the quarter, Horizon also realized ~~$2.5~~$3.2 million of ~~hedge~~ gains from settled hedges, which are recorded in other non-operating income (expense). After including all ~~hedge~~ gains on settled hedges recorded during the quarter, our “economic,” or net, fuel expense increased ~~$2.4~~ $4.9

			million, or ~~16.9%~~31.4%, over 2004. Our economic fuel cost per gallon increased ~~16.9%~~25.0% from ~~$1.18~~$1.28 in 2004 to ~~$1.38~~$1.59 in 2005. At current market prices, we expect that the cost per gallon in the third and fourth quarters will meet or exceed second quarter levels.

			See page 2224 for a table summarizing fuel cost per gallon realized by Horizon (the economic cost per gallon), the cost per gallon on a GAAP basis (including hedging gains recorded in aircraft fuel and non-operating income (expense)) and fuel cost per gallon excluding all hedging activities.

	•		Aircraft maintenance expense decreased $1.3 million, or 13.8%, primarily due to the timing of our airframe and engine events and the elimination of amortization expense on capitalized airframe and engine overhauls as a result of the accounting change in the first quarter (see Note 2 to our condensed consolidated financial statements).

	•		Depreciation and amortization increased $1.0 million, or 9.0%, primarily due to the addition of one CRJ-700 at the end of the first quarter of 2005 and a Q400 delivered in the third quarter of 2004.

	•		Landing fees and other rentals increased $1.4 million, or 13.6%. Higher landing fees are a result of significant rate increases in several of our key airports. We expect landing fees and other rentals to continue to increase as a result of airport facility expansions and increased costs for security.

	•		Other expenses declined $1.1 million, or 10.3%, due primarily to reductions in aircraft liability insurance and property taxes and a gain on the sale of one of our F-28’s during the second quarter of 2005.

Consolidated Nonoperating Income (Expense)

Net nonoperating income was $20.6 million in the second quarter of 2005 compared to $19.9 million during the same period of 2004. Interest income increased $1.0 million due to a larger average marketable securities portfolio in the second quarter of 2005. Interest expense (net of capitalized interest) increased $1.7 million primarily due to interest rate increases on our variable rate debt and the changes to some of our variable rate debt agreements to slightly higher fixed rate agreements.

Fuel hedging gains include $24.5 million in gains from fuel hedging contracts settled in the second quarter of 2005 compared to $3.6 million in 2004. In addition, fuel hedging gains include net mark-to-market gains on unsettled hedge contracts of $3.0 million in 2005 and $22.3 million in 2004.

Comparison of Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 to Six Months Ended June 30, 2004

Our consolidated net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was $63.1 million, or $1.82 per diluted share, versus a net loss of $44.4 million, or $1.66 per diluted share, during the same period of 2004.

Our consolidated operating loss for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was $71.8 million compared to an operating loss of $79.1 million during the same period of 2004. Our consolidated income before income tax and the accounting change for the six months of 2005 was $46.7 million compared to a pre-tax loss of $66.9 million for the first six months of 2004. Both the 2005 and 2004 results include certain significant items that impact the comparability of the six-month periods. Our 2005 consolidated net income includes a $144.7 million pre-tax ($90.4 million after tax) charge resulting from the change in the method of accounting for major airframe and engine overhauls as discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. Additionally, we recorded restructuring charges of $22.1 million ($13.8 million, net of tax) in the first six months of 2005 related primarily to the termination of the lease at our Oakland heavy maintenance base and severance and related costs resulting from the subcontracting of the ramp services operation in Seattle. The results also include mark-to-market fuel hedging gains on contracts that settle in future periods of $93.0 million during the first six months of 2005 compared to $22.8 million in the same prior year period. Financial and statistical data comparisons for Alaska and Horizon are shown on pages 21 and 22, respectively. On pages 23 and 24, we have included a reconciliation of reported non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures. A discussion of the six-month data follows.

Alaska Airlines Revenues

Operating revenues increased $70.7 million, or 6.6%, during 2005 as compared to 2004.

Yield per passenger mile decreased 0.3%, although the yield trended higher in the second quarter, and passenger load factor increased 4.2 points during the first six months of 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004. The increases in traffic with relatively flat yields drove the 6.5% increase in passenger revenues in 2005.

Freight and mail revenues increased slightly by $2.4 million, or 5.9%, compared to the same period in 2004 because of a relatively new mail contract we have in the State of Alaska, offset by lower freight revenues.

Other-net revenues increased $5.0 million, or 8.5%, due largely to an increase in Mileage Plan revenues, resulting from higher award redemption on our partner airlines and an increase in cash receipts from miles sold, offset by the termination of contract maintenance work that we were performing for third parties in the second quarter of 2004 and are no longer performing.

Alaska Airlines Expenses

For the six months ended June 30, 2005, total operating expenses increased $70.1 million, or 6.2%, as compared to the same period in 2004. Operating expenses per ASM increased 5.2% in 2005 as compared to 2004. The increase in operating expenses is due largely to the significant increases in fuel costs, restructuring charges related to the subcontracting of the ramp services operation in Seattle and the closure of the Oakland hangar, contracted services costs, aircraft maintenance, and landing fees and other rentals, offset by a decline in wages and benefits, food and beverage service, other

selling expenses and commissions and depreciation and amortization. Operating expense per ASM excluding fuel, restructuring and impairment charges increased 0.4% as compared to the same period in 2004. As noted above, operating expense per ASM was also negatively impacted by the summer capacity reductions.

Explanations of significant period-over-period changes in the components of operating expenses are as follows:

	•		Wages and benefits decreased $22.8 million, or 5.6%, during the first six months of 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. Wages have been favorably impacted by the restructuring initiatives announced in August and September of 2004 and the reduction in pilot wages resulting from the arbitrator’s decision in May 2005. Additionally, during the second quarter of 2005, we subcontracted our ramp services operation in Seattle. During the first six months of 2005, there were 9,180 full-time equivalents (FTEs), which is down by 940 FTEs from 2004.

	•		Contracted services increased $6.9 million, or 13.1%, due largely to the contracting out of the Company’s fleet service and ground service equipment and facility maintenance in the fourth quarter of 2004, and the Seattle ramp operations in May 2005.

	•		Aircraft fuel increased $72.9 million, or 35.4%, due to a 36.5% increase in the GAAP fuel cost per gallon, offset by a 0.8% decrease in fuel gallons consumed. The increase in aircraft fuel expense is inclusive of $6.6 million of gains from settled hedges. During the first six months of 2005, Alaska also realized $37.0 million of gains from settled hedges, which are recorded in other non-operating income. After including all gains from settled hedges recorded during the period, our “economic,” or net, fuel expense increased $39.1 million, or 19.3%, over the same period in 2004. Our economic fuel cost per gallon increased 20.2% over the first six months of 2004 from $1.42 to $1.18.

			See page 23 for a table summarizing fuel cost per gallon realized by Alaska (the economic cost per gallon), the cost per gallon on a GAAP basis (including hedging gains recorded in aircraft fuel and non-operating income (expense)) and fuel cost per gallon excluding all hedging activities.

	•		Aircraft maintenance increased $16.1 million, or 19.1%, due largely to our power-by-the-hour maintenance agreement, whereby we expense B737-400 engine maintenance on a flight-hour basis, regardless of whether the work was actually performed during the period. Other factors causing the increase were the contracting out of related heavy maintenance to third parties, which resulted in a shift of costs from wages and benefits into aircraft maintenance, more airframe work and engine overhauls in 2005 compared to 2004, and the change in our accounting policy regarding engine and airframe overhauls (see Note 2 to our condensed consolidated financial statements).

	•		Food and beverage service expense decreased $1.8 million, or 7.4%, due primarily to increased focus on cost reduction resulting in a decrease in average food and beverage cost per passenger.

	•		Other selling expenses and commissions decreased $1.3 million, or 2.0% due to a decline in advertising expense, offset by increases in commissions and codeshare fees.

	•		Depreciation and amortization decreased $2.2 million, or 3.5%. In the second quarter of 2004, we recorded an impairment charge of $36.8 million to reduce the carrying value of the Boeing 737-200C fleet, which results in lower depreciation expense in future periods. This is offset by the increased depreciation on two new owned aircraft delivered during the first six months of 2005.

	•		Landing fees and other rentals increased $12.6 million, or 18.4%. The higher rates reflect increased rental costs, primarily in Seattle, Portland and Los Angeles.

	•		Other expenses increased $4.1 million, or 5.4%, primarily reflecting increases in passenger remuneration costs, professional services costs, legal settlement costs and personnel and crew costs.

Horizon Air Revenues

For the first six months of 2005, operating revenues increased $26.8 million, or 11.4% compared to 2004. This increase is due largely to the increased traffic in the native network and the contract flying for Frontier Airlines, which began in January 2004, partially offset by a 4.7% decline in ticket yields.

For the six months ended June 30, 2005, capacity increased 9.9% and traffic was up 17.8%, compared to the same period in 2004, due to an increase in contract flying with Frontier, the addition of one CRJ 700 in March 2005 and four additional seats on each of our Q400’s. Contract flying with Frontier represented approximately 9.5% of passenger revenues and 22.4% of capacity, during the first half of 2005 compared to 8.6% and 19.5%, respectively, in the first six months of 2004. Passenger load factor increased 4.7 percentage points to 71.1%. Passenger yield decreased 4.7% to 21.95 cents, reflecting the inclusion of the Frontier contract flying, the yield for which is significantly lower than native network flying and an increase in average trip lengths across the native network, partially due to an increase in harmonization flying with Alaska. Passenger revenues increased by $27.7 million, or 12.2%, due primarily to the increase in traffic resulting from increased harmonization flying with Alaska and the increase in Frontier contract flying.

Horizon Air Expenses

Operating expenses for the first six months of 2005 increased $20.3 million, or 8.4%, compared to the same period in 2004. Operating expenses per ASM decreased 1.4% as compared to 2004. Operating expenses per ASM excluding fuel and impairment charges decreased 4.5% as compared to the same

period in 2004. Operating expenses in 2004 include $2.8 million related to an impairment charge on our held-for-sale F-28 aircraft and spare engines to lower the carrying value of these assets to their estimated fair value.

Explanations of other significant period-over-period changes in the components of operating expenses are as follows:

	•		Wages and benefits increased $3.9 million, or 4.7%, reflecting a slight increase in the average number of employees, wages per employee, and a new performance-based incentive program for all employees, partially offset by favorable reductions of medical and workers compensation accruals.

	•		Aircraft fuel increased $12.6 million, or 41.7%, due to a 38.3% increase in the GAAP fuel cost per gallon from $1.24 in 2004 to $1.72 in 2005. The increase in aircraft fuel expense is inclusive of $0.8 million of gains from settled hedges. During the first six months of 2005, Horizon also realized $5.7 million of gains from settled hedges, which are recorded in other non-operating income (expense). After including all gains from settled hedges recorded during the period, our “economic,” or net, fuel expense increased $7.3 million, or 24.5%, over 2004. Our economic fuel cost per gallon increased 21.3% from $1.23 in 2004 to $1.49 in 2005.

			See page 24 for a table summarizing fuel cost per gallon realized by Horizon (the economic cost per gallon), the cost per gallon on a GAAP basis (including hedging gains recorded in aircraft fuel and non-operating income (expense)) and fuel cost per gallon excluding all hedging activities.

	•		Aircraft maintenance expense increased ~~$3.8~~$2.5 million, or ~~52.1%~~15.0%, primarily due to a higher number of routine maintenance activities and engine overhauls for the Q200 and Q400 fleets and fewer aircraft covered by warranty. These increases are partially offset by the elimination of amortization expense on capitalized airframe and engine overhauls as a result of the accounting change in the first quarter of 2005 (see Note 2 to our condensed consolidated financial statements).

	•		Depreciation and amortization increased $1.6 million, or 25.4%, primarily due to the addition of one CRJ-700 at the end of the first quarter of 2005 and a Q400 in the third quarter of 2004.

	•		Landing fees and other rentals increased ~~$1.9~~$3.3 million, or ~~19.2%~~16.3%. Higher landing fees are a result of ~~higher rates associated with~~significant rate increases in several of our key airports, modest volume growth and an increase in airport fees and increased costs for security. ~~We expect landing fees and other rentals to continue to increase as a result of airport facility expansions and increased costs for security.~~

Consolidated Nonoperating Income (Expense)

Net nonoperating income was ~~$97.9~~$118.5 million infor the first ~~quarter~~six months of 2005 compared to ~~net expense of $7.7~~$12.2 million ~~during~~in the same period of 2004. Interest income increased ~~$1.3~~$2.3 million due to a larger average marketable securities portfolio in ~~the first quarter of~~ 2005. Interest

expense (net of capitalized interest) increased ~~$0.9~~$2.6 million ~~primarily~~ due to interest rate increases on our variable rate ~~debt.~~

debt and the changes to some of our variable rate debt agreements to slightly higher fixed rate agreements.

Fuel hedging gains include ~~$18.2~~$42.7 million in gains from fuel hedging contracts settled in the first ~~quarter~~six months of 2005 compared to ~~none~~$3.6 million in 2004. In addition, fuel hedging gains include net mark-to-market gains on unsettled hedge contracts of ~~$90.0~~$93.0 million in 2005 and ~~$0.4~~$22.8 million in 2004.

Consolidated Income Tax Expense (Benefit)

Accounting standards require us to provide for income taxes each quarter based on either our estimate of the effective tax rate for the full year or the actual year-to-date effective tax rate if it is our best estimate of our annual expectation. ~~The~~As the volatility of airfares and fuel prices and the seasonality of our business make it difficult to accurately forecast full-year pretax ~~results.~~results, we use the actual year-to-date effective tax rate to provide for income taxes. In addition, a relatively small change in pretax results can cause a significant change in the effective tax rate due to the magnitude of nondeductible expenses, such as employee per diem costs, relative to pretax profit or loss. Our effective income tax rate on pre-tax income before the accounting change for the second quarter and first ~~quarter~~six months of 2005 is ~~41.8%.~~41.4% and 41.5%, respectively. We applied our estimated 2005 year-to-date composite rate of 37.5% for the cumulative effect of the accounting change. In arriving at these rates, we considered a variety of factors, including year-to-date pretax results, the U.S. federal rate of 35%, estimated year-to-date nondeductible expenses and estimated state income taxes. We evaluate our tax rate each quarter and make adjustments when necessary.

Change in Accounting Policy

Effective January 1, 2005, the Company changed its method of accounting for major airframe and engine overhauls from thecapitalize and amortizemethod to thedirect expensemethod. Under the ~~capitalize and amortize~~former method, these costs were capitalized and amortized to maintenance expense over the shorter of the life of the overhaul or the remaining lease term. Under thedirect expensemethod, overhaul costs are expensed as incurred. The Company believes that thedirect expensemethod is preferable because it eliminates the judgment and estimation needed to determine overhaul versus repair allocations in maintenance activities. Additionally, the Company’s approved maintenance program for the majority of its airframes now focuses more on shorter, but more frequent, maintenance ~~visits that result in a higher portion of the work being repair activity.~~visits. Management also believes that thedirect expensemethod is the predominant method used in the airline industry. Accordingly, effective January 1, 2005, the Company wrote off the net book value of its previously capitalized airframe and engine overhauls for all aircraft in a charge totaling $144.7 million pre-tax ($90.4 million after tax). The Company does not believe disclosing the effect of adopting thedirect expensemethod on net income for the period ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005 provides meaningful information because of changes in the Company’s maintenance program, including the execution of a ~~“Power~~“power by the hour” engine maintenance agreement with a third party in late 2004.

3237

Critical Accounting Estimates

For information on our critical accounting estimates, see Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The table below presents the major indicators of financial condition and liquidity.



	March 31, 2005			December 31, 2004			Change			June 30, 2005			December 31, 2004			Change

	(In millions, except per share and debt-to-capital amounts)									(In millions, except per share and debt-to-capital amounts)
Cash and marketable securities	$	763.5		$	873.9		$	(110.4	)	$	726.1		$	873.9		$	(147.8	)
Working capital		178.0			285.0			(107.0	)		113.2			285.0			(171.8	)
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations		980.4			989.6			(9.2	)
Long-term debt and Long-term capital lease obligations											979.5			989.6			(10.1	)
Shareholders’ equity		584.5			664.8			(80.3	)		601.1			664.8			(63.7	)
Book value per common share	$	21.50		$	24.51		$	(3.01	)	$	22.12		$	24.51		$	(2.39	)
Long-term debt-to-capital		63%:37	%		60%:40	%	NA				62%:38	%		60%:40	%	NA
Long-term debt-to-capital assuming aircraft operating leases are capitalized at seven times annualized rent		80%:20	%		78%:22	%	NA				79%:21	%		78%:22	%	NA

During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005, our cash and marketable securities decreased ~~$110.4~~$147.8 million to ~~$763.5 million.~~$726.1 million at June 30, 2005. This decrease reflects cash used for property and equipment additions, net of aircraft deposit returns and proceeds from asset dispositions of ~~$102.5~~$236.8 million and cash used in financing activities of ~~$7.6~~$4.3 million, ~~and cash used in operating activities of $3.3 million.~~

~~Cash Provided~~partially offset by ~~(Used in) Operating Activities~~

~~During the first quarter of 2005, net cash used in operating activities was $3.3 million, compared to~~ cash provided by operating activities of ~~$21.6 million during the same period of 2004. The decline was driven by sharp increases in fuel costs offset by higher revenues.~~

$90.3 million.

Cash Provided by ~~(Used in) Investing~~Operating Activities

~~Cash~~

During the first six months of 2005, net cash provided by ~~investing~~operating activities was ~~$229.0~~$90.3 million, compared to $188.8 million during the first ~~quarter~~six months of 2004. The decrease is due largely to the significant increases in the cost of fuel in the current year, cash payments made for severance, and a $42.7 million tax refund in 2004.

Cash Used in Investing Activities

Cash used in investing activities was $82.8 million during the first six months of 2005, compared to ~~cash used in investing activities of $97.8~~$128.0 million during the same period of 2004. We had net sales of marketable securities of ~~$330.4~~$153.0 million and ~~$102.5~~net purchases of $236.8 million for property and equipment additions, net of aircraft deposit returns and proceeds from asset dispositions. During the ~~three~~first six months ~~ended March 31,~~of 2005, our aircraft related capital expenditures, net of aircraft deposit returns and proceeds from asset dispositions, increased ~~$52.3~~$152.5 million as compared to 2004, primarily reflecting the

purchase of two aircraft in the first six months of 2005 and the net payment of $101.2 million related to the aircraft purchase commitment entered into during the second quarter of 2005 to acquire 35 B737-800 aircraft. As of

3338

~~same period of 2004, primarily as a result of two new aircraft purchases in 2005. As of~~

January 1, 2005, we no longer have capital expenditures related to overhauls as those maintenance activities are expensed as incurred under our maintenance accounting policy adopted on that date. We expect capital expenditures to be approximately ~~$230.0~~$350.0 million for the full year of ~~2005.~~

2005 and approximately $430 million in 2006 as we begin to take delivery of several aircraft.

Cash ~~Provided by (Used in)~~Used in Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities was ~~$7.6~~$4.3 million during the first ~~quarter~~six months of 2005 compared to ~~net cash provided by financing activities of $48.2~~$48.6 million during the same period ofin 2004. There ~~were no new~~was one debt ~~issuances in~~issuance during the first ~~quarter~~half of ~~2005. There~~2005 of $20.0 million, which is secured by flight equipment. This note has a fixed interest rate of 6.07% and the payment term is 15 years. Debt issuances during the period were offset by normal long-term debt payments of ~~$8.6 million during 2005.~~

$26.5 million.

We plan to meet our capital and operating commitments through cash flow from operations and from cash and marketable securities on hand at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005 of ~~$763.5~~$726.1 million. We also have restricted cash of ~~$10.8~~$8.7 million, which is intended to collateralize interest payments due over the next ~~twelve~~nine months on our ~~$150~~$150.0 million floating rate senior convertible notes due 2023 issued in 2003.

Bank Line of Credit Facility

Any borrowings will be secured by either aircraft or cash collateral. This credit facility contains contractual restrictions and requires maintenance of specific levels of net worth, maintenance of certain debt and leases to net worth, leverage and fixed charge coverage ratios, and limits on liens, asset dispositions, dividends, and certain other expenditures. Such provisions restrict Alaska Airlines from distributing any funds to Alaska Air Group in the form of dividends and limit the amount of funds Alaska Airlines can loan to Alaska Air Group. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005, $300.0 million was available to loan to Alaska Air Group without violating the covenants in the credit facility. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005, there are no outstanding borrowings on this credit facility and the Company has no immediate plans to borrow using this credit facility.

Supplemental Disclosure of Noncash Investing and Financing Activities

We received a $9.7 million credit toward our purchase deposits related to the recent aircraft purchase agreement entered into during the second quarter of 2005. This credit was recorded as additional purchase deposits and is included in other liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet and will be applied to future aircraft upon delivery.

Contractual Obligations, Commitments and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Aircraft Purchase Commitments

At ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005, we had firm orders for 1244 aircraft requiring aggregate payments of approximately ~~$318.6 million,~~$1.4 billion, as set forth below. In addition, Alaska ~~had~~has options to acquire 2315 additional B737’s, and

Horizon ~~had~~has options to acquire 1211 Q400’s and 2119 CRJ 700’s. Alaska and Horizon expect to finance the firm orders and, to the extent exercised, the option aircraft with leases, long-term debt or internally generated cash. ~~We expect to purchase the~~The B737-800 ~~to be~~ delivered inon July 1, 2005 was acquired with cash on hand.

The following table summarizes aircraft ~~purchase~~ commitments and payments by year:


Delivery Period - Firm Orders	Delivery Period - Firm Orders															Delivery Period - Firm Orders
		April 1 – December 31,										Beyond					July 1-December 31,										Beyond
Aircraft		2005		2006		2007		2008		2009		2009		Total			2005		2006		2007		2008		2009		2009		Total

Boeing 737-800			1		3		—		—		—		—		4			1		10		8		5		3		9		36
Bombardier CRJ700			—		2		2		2		2		—		8			—		2		2		2		2		—		8

Total			1		5		2		2		2		—		12			1		12		10		7		5		9		44

Payments (Millions)		$	46.6	$	123.7	$	54.5	$	53.0	$	40.8	$	—	$	318.6		$	68.3	$	358.7	$	282.1	$	221.4	$	159.7	$	262.2	$	1,352.4

Contractual Obligations

The following table provides a summary of our principal payments under current and long-term debt and capital lease obligations, operating lease commitments, aircraft purchase commitments and other obligations as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005. This table excludes contributions to our various pension plans, which we expect to be approximately $55 million to $65 million per year through 2008.



	April 1 - December 31,										Beyond				July 1 – December 31,										Beyond
(in millions)	2005		2006		2007		2008		2009		2009^*		Total		2005		2006		2007		2008		2009		2009		Total

Current and long-term debt and capital lease obligations*	$	44.9	$	57.0	$	60.1	$	63.2	$	67.0	$	742.2	$	1,034.4	$	29.3	$	58.5	$	61.6	$	64.9	$	68.2	$	754.0	$	1,036.5
Operating lease commitments		174.5		284.7		196.0		190.4		174.7		942.1	$	1,962.4		126.2		238.3		211.3		205.8		189.2		947.4	$	1,918.2
Aircraft purchase commitments		46.6		123.7		54.5		53.0		40.8		—	$	318.6		68.3		358.7		282.1		221.4		159.7		262.2	$	1,352.4
Interest obligations (1)		43.9		52.4		49.3		47.4		42.3		211.8	$	447.1		20.3		52.5		51.5		49.6		47.2		159.8	$	380.9
Other purchase obligations (2)		21.1		29.1		29.4		29.7		30.0		154.5	$	293.8		13.6		29.1		29.4		29.7		30.0		154.5	$	286.3

Total	$	331.0	$	546.9	$	389.3	$	383.7	$	354.8	$	2,050.6	$	4,056.3	$	257.7	$	737.1	$	635.9	$	571.4	$	494.3	$	2,277.9	$	4,974.3

* Includes $150 million related to the Company’s senior convertible notes due in 2023. Holders of these Notes may require the Company to purchase all or a portion of their Notes, for a purchase ~~all or a portion of their Notes, for a purchase~~

price equal to principal plus accrued interest, on the 5^th, 10^th, and 15^th anniversaries of the issuance of the Notes, or upon the occurrence of a change in control or tax event, as defined in the agreement. See Note 11 in the consolidated financial statements.

(1) For variable rate debt, future obligations are shown above using interest rates in effect as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005.

(2) Includes obligations under our long-term power-by-the-hour engine maintenance agreement.

New Accounting Standards

During the fourth quarter of 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS 123R, “Share Based Payment: An Amendment of SFAS Nos. 123 and 95”. The new standard requires companies to recognize as expense the fair value of stock options and other equity based compensation issued to employees as of the grant date. This new standard will apply to both stock options that we grant to employees and our Employee Stock Purchase Plan, which features a look-back provision and allows employees to purchase stock at a 15% discount. Our options are typically granted with ~~graded~~ratable vesting provisions, and we intend to amortize compensation cost over the service period using the straight line method. Due to a recent decision by the Securities and Exchange Commission, implementation of SFAS 123R will be effective January 1, 2006. We intend to use the “modified prospective method” upon adoption whereby previously awarded but unvested equity awards are accounted for in accordance with SFAS 123R and prospective amounts are recognized in the income statement instead of simply being disclosed. Once adopted, we expect our stock based compensation expense, as measured under SFAS 123R, will be approximately $6 million to $10 million per year on a pre-tax basis.

In March 2005, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 47 (FIN 47), “Accounting for Conditional Asset
Retirement Obligations — an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143.” FIN 47 clarifies that an entity is required to recognize a liability for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligation when incurred if the liability’s fair value can be reasonably estimated. The FIN also clarifies when an entity would have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation. FIN 47 is effective no later than the end of our fiscal year ending December 31, 2005. FIN 47 is not expected to have a significant impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Effect of Inflation and Price Changes-

Inflation and price changes other than for aircraft fuel do not have a significant effect on our operating revenues, operating expenses and operating income.

ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative ~~Disclosures~~Disclosure about Market Risk

There have been no material changes in market risk from the information provided in Item 7A “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk” in our 2004 ~~10-K~~10K except as follows:

Fuel Hedging

We purchase jet fuel at prevailing market prices, and seek to manage the risk of price fluctuations through execution of a documented hedging strategy. We utilize derivative financial instruments as hedges to decrease our exposure to the volatility of jet fuel prices. ~~We believe there is risk in not hedging against the possibility of fuel price increases.~~ At ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005, we had fuel hedge contracts in place to hedge ~~158.0~~106.1 million gallons of our expected jet fuel usage during the remainder of 2005, 181.4 million gallons in 2006, ~~65.8~~86.0 million gallons in 2007 and ~~5.4~~31.7 million gallons in 2008. This represents 50%, 42%, ~~15%,~~20% and 1%7% of our anticipated fuel consumption in 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008, respectively. Prices of these agreements range from ~~$28.81~~$29 to ~~$51.56~~$50 per crude oil barrel.

We estimate that a 10% increase or decrease in crude oil prices as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005 would impact ~~the fair value of our hedge portfolio~~hedging positions by approximately ~~$54.1~~$39.0 million and ~~$51.3~~$37.7 million, respectively.

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the fair values of our fuel hedge positions were ~~$189.5~~$194.5 million and $96.0 million, respectively. Of these amounts, ~~$124.4~~$123.6 million of the 2005 fair value amounts and $65.7 million of the 2004 fair value amounts were included in current assets in the ~~condensed~~ consolidated balance sheets based on the settlement dates for the underlying contracts. The remaining ~~$65.1~~$70.9 million 2005 fair value and $30.3 million 2004 fair value is reflected as a non-current asset in the ~~condensed~~ consolidated balance sheets.

Please refer to pages 2123 and ~~22,~~24, as well as to Note 54 in the condensed consolidated financial statements, for company specific data on the results of our fuel hedging program.

Financial Market Risk

During the first half of 2005, we issued $20.0 million of debt secured by flight equipment, having an interest rate of 6.07% and a payment term of 15 years.

In the second quarter of 2005, the Company exercised its option under several of its existing variable rate long-term debt arrangements to fix the interest rates through maturity. The fixed rates on these recently affected debt arrangements range from 5.2% to 6.3%. These changes did not result in any gain or loss in the consolidated statements of operations.

ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer (collectively, our “certifying officers”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. These disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in our periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC’s rules and forms, and that the information is communicated to our certifying officers on a timely basis.

Our certifying officers concluded, based on their evaluation, that disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

We made no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005, that our certifying officers concluded materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially ~~effect,~~affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

We intend to regularly review and evaluate the design and effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting on an ongoing basis and to improve

these controls and procedures over time and to correct any deficiencies that we may discover in the future. While we believe the present design of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting are effective, future events affecting our business may cause us to modify our these controls and procedures in the future.

PART IIII. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings

~~Our pilot~~

In May 2005, the Air Line Pilots Association filed a lawsuit in federal district court in Seattle to overturn the current labor contract ~~provided that, if a negotiated agreement on the entire contract could not be reached~~covering Alaska’s pilots as established by ~~December 15, 2004, ten contract issues plus wage rates would be submitted to~~ an ~~interest arbitrator. The parties did not reach an agreement, and each party submitted five issues to binding arbitration, resulting in a decision that became~~arbitrator, which was effective on May 1, 2005. If the arbitrator’s decision is overturned, Alaska may be required to pay wages retroactively to May 1, 2005 as if the contract that existed prior to the arbitrator’s decision were still in effect. On July 21, 2005, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit. The motion will be decided on evidence submitted or following oral argument. A decision is expected in the third quarter of 2005. At this time, the Company has no reason to believe that an unfavorable outcome is likely.

In March 2005, the Company filed a claim against the International Association of Machinists (IAM) seeking to compel arbitration ~~resulted~~of the dispute regarding the subcontracting of the Company’s ramp service operation in ~~an average pilot wage decrease~~Seattle. In May 2005, the IAM filed a counter claim against the Company alleging that the Company violated the status quo and engaged in bad faith bargaining. On May 13, 2005, the Company announced that it had subcontracted the ramp service operation in Seattle, resulting in the immediate reduction of approximately ~~26%, various work rule changes resulting~~475 employees represented by the IAM. Shortly after this event, the IAM filed a motion for a preliminary injunction seeking to reverse the subcontracting by the Company. That motion was heard and denied by a federal court judge on June 2, 2005. The Company’s lawsuit and the IAM’s counterclaim are still pending in ~~productivity improvements~~federal court. A discovery schedule and ~~higher employee health care contributions. No changes were made~~trial date have not yet been set. At this time, the Company has no reason to ~~the pilots’ pension or profit sharing plans.~~

believe that an unfavorable outcome is likely.

We are a party to ordinary routine litigation incidental to our business and with respect to which no material liability is expected. Management believes the ultimate disposition of these matters is not likely to materially affect our financial position or results of operations. This forward-looking statement is based on management’s current understanding of the relevant law and facts; it is subject to various contingencies, including the potential costs and risks associated with litigation and the actions of judges and juries.

ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

ITEM 3. Default on Senior Securities

None

~~None.~~

ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

	(a)		The Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders was held on May 17, 2005.

	(b)		At the Annual Meeting, Phyllis J. Campbell, Mark R. Hamilton, Byron I. Mallott and Richard A. Wien were elected directors for three-year terms expiring on the date of the Annual Meeting in 2008. The votes were as follows:


	For		Withheld		Broker Non-Votes
Phyllis J. Campbell		16,016,779		8,224,693		0
Mark R. Hamilton		16,016,635		8,224,837		0
Byron I. Mallott		14,168,494		10,072,978		0
Richard A. Wien		16,014,975		8,226,497		0
Richard D. Foley		5,064		0		0
Steve Nieman		5,253		0		0
Robert C. Osborne		2,097		0		0
Terry K. Dayton		4,910		0		0
John Chevedden		190		0		0
Carl Olson		2,760		0		0

The terms of the following directors continued after the Annual Meeting:


William S. Ayer		R. Marc Langland
Patricia M. Bedient		Dennis F. Madsen
Bruce R. Kennedy		John V. Rindlaub
Jessie J. Knight, Jr.		J. Kenneth Thompson

(c)

The results of voting on Proposal 2 through 9 were as follows:

A stockholder-sponsored bylaw amendment regarding stockholder rights plans failed to reach the 75% supermajority of votes present required to amend the Bylaws.


					% of Shares		% of Votes
	Number of		% of Shares		Present on		Cast for or
	Votes		Outstanding		this Proposal		Against
For		15,815,603		58.18		65.24		76.96
Against		4,736,015		17.42		19.54		23.04

~~None.~~

3844

% of Shares

% of Votes

Number of

% of Shares

Present on

Cast for or

Votes

Outstanding

this Proposal

Against

Abstain

569,561

2.10

2.35

Broker Non-votes

3,120,293

11.48

12.87

A stockholder-sponsored bylaw amendment regarding confidential voting failed to reach the 75% supermajority of votes present required to amend the Bylaws.


					% of Shares		% of Votes
	Number of		% of Shares		Present on		Cast for or
	Votes		Outstanding		this Proposal		Against
For		4,908,590		18.06		20.25		23.30
Against		16,153,924		59.43		66.64		76.70
Abstain		58,665		0.22		0.24
Broker Non-votes		3,120,293		11.48		12.87

A stockholder-sponsored bylaw amendment regarding cumulative voting failed to reach the 75% supermajority of votes present required to amend the Bylaws.


					% of Shares		% of Votes
	Number of		% of Shares		Present on		Cast for or
	Votes		Outstanding		this Proposal		Against
For		11,836,250		43.54		48.83		56.32
Against		9,180,168		33.77		37.87		43.68
Abstain		104,761		0.39		0.43
Broker Non-votes		3,120,293		11.48		12.87

A stockholder-sponsored bylaw amendment regarding annual election of directors reached the 75% supermajority of votes present required to amend the Bylaws. The board has determined, for the reasons set forth in the proxy statement, that the amendment cannot be effected.


					% of Shares		% of Votes
	Number of		% of Shares		Present on		Cast for or
	Votes		Outstanding		this Proposal		Against
For		18,427,132		67.79		76.01		87.46
Against		2,641,480		9.72		10.90		12.54
Abstain		52,567		0.19		0.22
Broker Non-votes		3,120,293		11.48		12.87

A stockholder-sponsored bylaw amendment regarding simple majority voting to amend the Bylaws reached the 75% supermajority of votes present required to

amend the Bylaws. The board has determined, for the reasons set forth in the proxy statement, that the amendment cannot be effected.


					% of Shares		% of Votes
	Number of		% of Shares		Present on		Cast for or
	Votes		Outstanding		this Proposal		Against
For		18,352,995		67.52		75.71		89.27
Against		2,205,787		8.11		9.10		10.73
Abstain		562,397		2.07		2.32
Broker Non-votes		3,120,293		11.48		12.87

A stockholder proposal recommending that the Board implement a simple majority voting policy passed, receiving a majority of the shares voted.


					% of Shares		% of Votes
	Number of		% of Shares		Present on		Cast for or
	Votes		Outstanding		this Proposal		Against
For		14,810,048		54.48		61.09		72.06
Against		5,741,666		21.12		23.69		27.94
Abstain		569,465		2.09		2.35
Broker Non-votes		3,120,293		11.48		n/a

A stockholder-sponsored bylaw amendment regarding ballot access for stockholder-nominated candidates failed to reach the 75% supermajority of votes present required to amend the Bylaws.


					% of Shares		% of Votes
	Number of		% of Shares		Present on		Cast for or
	Votes		Outstanding		this Proposal		Against
For		5,253		0.02		0.04		0.04
Against		11,847,143		43.58		99.96		99.96
Abstain		0		0.00		0.00
Broker Non-votes		0		0.00		0.00

A stockholder-sponsored bylaw amendment requiring the disclosure of each board member’s voting record and providing board seats to the proponents of majority stockholder proposals that are not implemented within three months of passage failed to reach the 75% supermajority of votes present required to amend the Bylaws.


					% of Shares		% of Votes
	Number of		% of Shares		Present on		Cast for or
	Votes		Outstanding		this Proposal		Against
For		5,253		0.02		0.04		0.04
Against		11,847,143		43.58		99.96		99.96
Abstain		0		0.00		0.00
Broker Non-votes		0		0.00		0.00

ITEM 5. Other Information

No changes have been made to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to our Board of Directors since the filing of our definitive proxy statement for our 2005 annual meeting of shareholders.

ITEM 6. Exhibits

See Exhibit Index on page ~~41.~~

49.

3947

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


ALASKA AIR GROUP, INC.

Registrant

~~Date: May 6, 2005~~


Date: August 5, 2005

By:		~~/s/~~ /s/ Brandon S. Pedersen

Brandon S. Pedersen
Staff Vice President/Finance and Controller


By:	~~/s/~~ /s/ Bradley D. Tilden

Bradley D. Tilden
Executive Vice President/Finance and Chief Financial Officer

4048

EXHIBIT INDEX

Pursuant to Item 601(a)(2) of Regulation S-K, this Exhibit Index immediately precedes the exhibits.

The following exhibits are numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K.


Exhibit No.		Description
~~10.1 (1)~~10.1(1)		~~Credit~~Aircraft General Terms Agreement dated ~~as of March 25,~~June 15, 2005, ~~among~~between the Boeing Company and Alaska Airlines, Inc.~~, as borrower, Bank of America, N.A. as administrative agent, Citicorp USA, Inc. as syndication agent, U.S. Bank National Association as documentation agent, and other lenders.~~*
10.2(1)		Purchase Agreement No. 2497 dated June 15, 2005, between the Boeing Company and Alaska Airlines, Inc.*
~~18.1 (1)~~		~~Letter from KPMG LLP regarding change in accounting principle~~

~~31.1 (1)~~31.1(1)		Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 1815 U.S.C. Section ~~1350~~7241

~~31.2 (1)~~31.2(1)		Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 1815 U.S.C. Section ~~1350~~7241

~~32.1 (1)~~32.1(1)		Section 906 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

~~31.2 (1)~~32.2(1)		Section ~~302~~906 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


(1)		Filed herewith.

*		Pursuant to 17 CFR 240.24b-2, confidential information has been omitted and has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to a Confidential Treatment Application filed with the Commission.

4149


PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1:1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
	~~ITEM~~Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
PART IIII. OTHER INFORMATION
	~~ITEM~~Item 1. Legal Proceedings
	~~ITEM~~Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
	~~ITEM~~Item 3. Default on Senior Securities
	~~ITEM~~Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
	~~ITEM~~Item 5. Other Information
	~~ITEM~~Item 6. Exhibits
Signatures
~~EXHIBIT INDEX~~
EXHIBIT 10.1
EXHIBIT ~~18.1~~10.2
EXHIBIT 31.1
EXHIBIT 31.2
EXHIBIT 32.1
EXHIBIT 32.2



Asset Impairment and Lease Termination Costs

Balance at December 31, 2004	$	0.0
Asset impairment charge		7.7
Write-off of impaired assets		(7.7	)
Lease termination costs		0.3
Cash payments		(0.1	)

Balance at March 31, 2005	$	0.2



Severance and Related Costs

Balance at December 31, 2004	$	38.7
Restructuring adjustment		(0.6	)
Cash payments		(20.3	)

Balance at March 31, 2005	$	17.8


	Three Months Ended March 31,
Unit cost reconciliations:	2005			2004
Operating expenses	$	130.6		$	119.8
ASMs (000,000)		782			692

Operating expenses per ASM		16.69	¢		17.30	¢


Operating expenses	$	130.6		$	119.8
Less: aircraft fuel		(19.1	)		(14.2	)
Less: impairment of aircraft and spare engines		—			(2.4	)

Operating expenses excluding fuel and impairment charge	$	111.5		$	103.2
ASMs (000,000)		782			692

Operating expenses per ASM excluding fuel and impairment charge		14.25	¢		14.91	¢


Reconciliation from GAAP pre-tax income (loss):
Pretax income (loss) reported GAAP amounts	$	4.6		$	(10.4	)
Less: mark-to-market hedging gains included in nonoperating income (expense)		(12.3	)		—
Add: impairment of aircraft and spare engines		—			2.4


Pretax loss excluding impairment charge and mark-to-market hedging gains	$	(7.7	)	$	(8.0	)

	announced in August and September of 2004 ~~largely offset by an increase~~and the reduction in pilot wages ~~a new performance-based incentive program for all employees, and an increase~~resulting from the arbitrator’s decision in ~~medical and pension benefits. During~~May 2005. Additionally, during the ~~first~~second quarter of 2005, ~~there~~we subcontracted our ramp services operation in Seattle. We expect a greater year-over-year decline in wages in the third quarter of 2005 as we see the full effect of some of these changes, with the increase tapering down as we get into the fourth quarter. We estimate that wages and benefits will decline approximately $34 million, or 16%, in the third quarter and $19 million, or 10% in the fourth quarter as compared to the same periods in 2004 as we complete a full year under some of the restructuring changes that were ~~9,219 full-time equivalents (FTEs), which is down~~made in the fourth quarter of the prior year. The period over period declines in wages and benefits are partially offset by ~~765 FTEs from 2004 on a 3.7% increase~~increases in ~~capacity.~~contracted services and maintenance expense due to the subcontracting of certain operations.

•		Contracted services increased ~~$4.7~~$2.2 million, or ~~20.3%~~7.5%, due largely to the contracting out of the Company’s fleet service and ground service equipment and facility maintenance ~~and costs associated with~~in the ~~service to Dutch Harbor, Alaska, which was contracted to PenAir in January~~

•	~~Other selling expenses and commissions decreased $1.2 million, or 3.5%, due to a decline in advertising expense, offset by increases in commissions and codeshare fees.~~

•	~~Depreciation~~	Food and ~~amortization~~beverage service expense decreased ~~$2.5~~$1.5 million, or ~~7.6%. The first quarter of 2004 included accelerated depreciation~~11.5%, due primarily to increased focus on the planned retirement of three Boeing 737-200Cs. In the second quarter of 2004, we recorded an impairment charge of $36.8 million to reduce the carrying value of the Boeing 737-200C fleet, which resultscost reduction resulting in ~~lower depreciation expense~~a decrease in ~~future periods.~~average food and beverage cost per passenger.

•		Landing fees and other rentals increased ~~$7.4~~$5.2 million, or ~~22.3%.~~14.7% despite a decrease in the number of departures. The higher rates reflect increased rental costs, primarily ~~reflect higher joint-use fees~~ in Seattle, Portland and Los ~~Angeles and exclusive rental fees at Seattle and Anchorage (including a $1.3 million adjustment in 2005 from the Port of Seattle related to 2004), combined with modest volume growth.~~Angeles. We expect landing fees and other rentals to continue to increase