UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
xQuarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
forFor the quarterly period ended January 31, 20182023
OR
oTransition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
forFor the transition period from to
Commission file number: 000-23255
COPART, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware94-2867490000-2325594-2867490
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(IRSCommission File Number)(I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation)Identification No.)
14185 Dallas ParkwaySuite 300DallasTexas75254
        (Address of principal executive offices) (zip code)
14185 Dallas Parkway, Suite 300, Dallas, Texas 75254
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(972) 391-5000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
N/A
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each classTrading Symbol(s)Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $0.0001CPRTThe NASDAQ Global Select Market

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),; and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO oYes No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES x NO oYes No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filerxAccelerated filer¨
Non-accelerated filer¨(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Smaller reporting company¨
Emerging growth company¨
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES ¨ NO xYes No
As of February 26, 2018, 231,994,30323, 2023, 476,592,516 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.




Copart, Inc.
Index to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
January 31, 2018
2023
Table of ContentsPage Number

2

Table of Contents



Copart, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share amounts) January 31, 2018 July 31, 2017(In thousands, except share amounts)January 31, 2023July 31, 2022
ASSETS    ASSETS
Current assets:    Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $195,300
 $210,100
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cashCash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash$1,660,952 $1,384,236 
Accounts receivable, net 398,972
 311,846
Accounts receivable, net765,192 578,573 
Vehicle pooling costs 37,969
 31,118
Vehicle pooling costs133,598 112,242 
Inventories 13,025
 10,163
Inventories52,071 58,791 
Income taxes receivable 3,836
 6,418
Income taxes receivable436 49,882 
Prepaid expenses and other assets 17,374
 17,616
Prepaid expenses and other assets26,532 18,731 
Total current assets 666,476
 587,261
Total current assets2,638,781 2,202,455 
Property and equipment, net 1,024,564
 944,056
Property and equipment, net2,656,273 2,485,764 
Operating lease right-of-use assetsOperating lease right-of-use assets106,656 116,303 
Intangibles, net 69,934
 75,938
Intangibles, net51,186 54,680 
Goodwill 344,499
 340,243
Goodwill404,046 401,954 
Deferred income taxes 301
 1,287
Other assets 37,767
 33,716
Other assets75,466 47,708 
Total assets $2,143,541
 $1,982,501
Total assets$5,932,408 $5,308,864 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY    LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:    Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $242,594
 $208,415
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities$439,271 $399,034 
Deferred revenue 6,797
 5,019
Deferred revenue23,796 20,061 
Income taxes payable 13,806
 6,472
Income taxes payable3,820 — 
Deferred income taxes 
 92
Current portion of revolving loan facility and capital lease obligations 111,851
 82,155
Current portion of operating and finance lease liabilitiesCurrent portion of operating and finance lease liabilities20,736 21,794 
Total current liabilities 375,048
 302,153
Total current liabilities487,623 440,889 
Deferred income taxes 5,196
 3,192
Deferred income taxes76,471 80,060 
Income taxes payable 27,128
 24,573
Income taxes payable65,322 64,637 
Long-term debt, revolving loan facility and capital lease obligations, net of discount 400,646
 550,883
Other liabilities 3,732
 3,100
Operating and finance lease liabilities, net of current portionOperating and finance lease liabilities, net of current portion87,394 95,683 
Long-term debt and other liabilitiesLong-term debt and other liabilities1,946 1,996 
Total liabilities 811,750
 883,901
Total liabilities718,756 683,265 
Commitments and contingencies 
 
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:    Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock: $0.0001 par value - 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued 
 
Preferred stock: $0.0001 par value - 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued— — 
Common stock: $0.0001 par value - 400,000,000 shares authorized; 231,827,612 and 230,488,296 shares issued and outstanding, respectively. 23
 23
Common stock: $0.0001 par value - 1,600,000,000 shares authorized; 476,564,148 and 476,081,948 shares issued and outstanding, respectively.Common stock: $0.0001 par value - 1,600,000,000 shares authorized; 476,564,148 and 476,081,948 shares issued and outstanding, respectively.48 48 
Additional paid-in capital 483,895
 453,349
Additional paid-in capital875,009 838,508 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (78,913) (100,676)Accumulated other comprehensive loss(156,507)(169,365)
Retained earnings 926,163
 745,370
Retained earnings4,495,102 3,956,408 
Noncontrolling interest 623
 534
Total stockholders’ equity 1,331,791
 1,098,600
Total stockholders’ equity5,213,652 4,625,599 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $2,143,541
 $1,982,501
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$5,932,408 $5,308,864 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3

Table of Contents

Copart, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
  Three Months Ended January 31, Six Months Ended January 31,
(In thousands, except per share amounts) 2018 2017 2018 2017
Service revenues and vehicle sales:        
Service revenues $401,954
 $310,033
 $776,079
 $617,111
Vehicle sales 57,152
 39,499
 102,195
 78,412
Total service revenues and vehicle sales 459,106
 349,532
 878,274
 695,523
Operating expenses:        
Yard operations 217,184
 169,081
 434,791
 336,692
Cost of vehicle sales 50,313
 33,686
 88,610
 66,773
General and administrative 40,662
 37,885
 79,984
 78,354
Total operating expenses 308,159
 240,652
 603,385
 481,819
Operating income 150,947
 108,880
 274,889
 213,704
         
Other (expense) income:        
Interest expense (5,758) (6,144) (11,353) (12,103)
Interest income 197
 384
 394
 721
Other (expense) income, net (948) (3,021) (5,364) 311
Total other expenses (6,509) (8,781) (16,323) (11,071)
Income before income taxes 144,438
 100,099
 258,566
 202,633
Income tax expense (benefit) 41,137
 34,033
 77,705
 (30,713)
Net income 103,301
 66,066
 180,861
 233,346
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest 45
 
 90
 
Net income attributable to Copart, Inc. $103,256
 $66,066
 $180,771
 $233,346
         
Basic net income per common share $0.45
 $0.29
 $0.78
 $1.03
Weighted average common shares outstanding 231,478
 229,142
 231,086
 227,288
         
Diluted net income per common share $0.43
 $0.28
 $0.75
 $0.99
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding 241,360
 235,588
 240,076
 236,672
Three Months Ended January 31,Six Months Ended January 31,
(In thousands, except per share amounts)2023202220232022
Service revenues and vehicle sales:
Service revenues$789,797 $711,090 $1,516,637 $1,378,908 
Vehicle sales166,927 156,370 333,459 298,684 
Total service revenues and vehicle sales956,724 867,460 1,850,096 1,677,592 
Operating expenses:
Yard operations375,497 323,814 748,274 622,508 
Cost of vehicle sales154,727 140,304 305,839 266,712 
General and administrative60,975 56,014 118,955 110,923 
Total operating expenses591,199 520,132 1,173,068 1,000,143 
Operating income365,525 347,328 677,028 677,449 
Other expense:
Interest income (expense), net14,480 (4,433)18,902 (9,540)
Other expense, net(2,902)(840)(5,724)(28)
Total other income (expense)11,578 (5,273)13,178 (9,568)
Income before income taxes377,103 342,055 690,206 667,881 
Income tax expense83,426 54,643 150,681 120,106 
Net income$293,677 $287,412 $539,525 $547,775 
Basic net income per common share$0.62 $0.61 $1.13 $1.15 
Weighted average common shares outstanding476,376 474,372 476,237 474,334 
Diluted net income per common share$0.61 $0.60 $1.12 $1.14 
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding482,536 482,374 482,238 482,488 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4

Table of Contents

Copart, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Unaudited)
 Three Months Ended January 31, Six Months Ended January 31,Three Months Ended January 31,Six Months Ended January 31,
(In thousands) 2018 2017 2018 2017(In thousands)2023202220232022
Comprehensive income, net of tax:        Comprehensive income, net of tax:
Net income $103,301
 $66,066
 $180,861
 $233,346
Net income$293,677 $287,412 $539,525 $547,775 
Other comprehensive income:        Other comprehensive income:
Foreign currency translation adjustments 23,243
 8,420
 21,763
 (10,355)Foreign currency translation adjustments42,429 (12,124)12,858 (22,642)
Comprehensive income 126,544
 74,486
 202,624
 222,991
Comprehensive income$336,106 $275,288 $552,383 $525,133 
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest 45
 
 90
 
Comprehensive income attributable to Copart, Inc. $126,499
 $74,486
 $202,534
 $222,991
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5

Table of Contents

Copart, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowsStockholders’ Equity
(Unaudited)
  Six Months Ended January 31,
(In thousands) 2018 2017
Cash flows from operating activities:    
Net income $180,861
 $233,346
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:    
Depreciation and amortization, including debt cost 33,994
 30,146
Allowance for doubtful accounts 1,013
 26
Equity in losses of unconsolidated affiliates 251
 408
Stock-based payment compensation 11,298
 10,605
Loss (gain) on sale of property and equipment 4,639
 (79)
Deferred income taxes 2,666
 23,466
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions:    
Accounts receivable (86,147) (74,789)
Vehicle pooling costs (6,548) (5,977)
Inventories (2,525) 1,033
Prepaid expenses and other current assets (1,437) 894
Other assets (4,320) (801)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 38,919
 (4,599)
Deferred revenue 1,705
 1,350
Income taxes receivable 2,575
 (64,757)
Income taxes payable 9,365
 5,934
Other liabilities 84
 (678)
Net cash provided by operating activities 186,393
 155,528
Cash flows from investing activities:    
Purchases of property and equipment (110,905) (92,412)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment 2,812
 386
Purchase of assets in connection with acquisitions 123
 
Investment in unconsolidated affiliate 
 (1,050)
Net cash used in investing activities (107,970) (93,076)
Cash flows from financing activities:    
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options 16,603
 20,381
Proceeds from the issuance of Employee Stock Purchase Plan shares 2,723
 1,908
Payments for employee stock-based tax withholdings (3) (134,638)
Net (repayments) proceeds on revolving loan facility (120,300) 72,000
Distributions to noncontrolling interest (55) 
Net cash used in financing activities (101,032) (40,349)
Effect of foreign currency translation 7,809
 (3,000)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents (14,800) 19,103
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 210,100
 155,849
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $195,300
 $174,952
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:    
Interest paid $11,010
 $11,810
Income taxes paid, net of refunds $64,104
 $4,616
Common StockAccumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
(In thousands, except share amounts)Outstanding
Shares
AmountRetained
Earnings
Stockholders’
Equity
Balances at July 31, 2022476,081,948 $48 $838,508 $(169,365)$3,956,408 $4,625,599 
Net income— — — — 245,848 245,848 
Currency translation adjustment— — — (29,571)— (29,571)
Exercise of stock options, net of repurchased shares75,554 — 1,061 — (295)766 
Stock-based compensation38,312 — 10,192 — — 10,192 
Balances at October 31, 2022476,195,814 48 849,761 (198,936)4,201,961 4,852,834 
Net income— — — — 293,677 293,677 
Currency translation adjustment— — — 42,429 — 42,429 
Exercise of stock options, net of repurchased shares223,426 — 9,754 — (536)9,218 
Stock-based compensation30,351 — 10,131 — — 10,131 
Shares issued for Employee Stock Purchase Plan114,557 — 5,363 — — 5,363 
Balances at January 31, 2023476,564,148 48 875,009 (156,507)4,495,102 5,213,652 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


Common StockAccumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
(In thousands, except share amounts)Outstanding
Shares
AmountRetained
Earnings
Stockholders’
Equity
Balances at July 31, 2021474,028,546 $48 $761,810 $(100,860)$2,868,203 $3,529,201 
Net income— — — — 260,363 260,363 
Currency translation adjustment— — — (10,518)— (10,518)
Exercise of stock options, net of repurchased shares291,972 — 5,572 — (249)5,323 
Stock-based compensation42,182 — 9,452 — — 9,452 
Balances at October 31, 2021474,362,700 48 776,834 (111,378)3,128,317 3,793,821 
Net income— — — — 287,412 287,412 
Currency translation adjustment— — — (12,124)— (12,124)
Exercise of stock options, net of repurchased shares492,902 — 6,413 — (350)6,063 
Stock-based compensation5,534 — 9,662 — — 9,662 
Shares issued for Employee Stock Purchase Plan87,848 — 5,022 — — 5,022 
Balances at January 31, 2022474,948,984 48 797,931 (123,502)3,415,379 4,089,856 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
6

Copart, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended January 31,
(In thousands)20232022
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income$539,525 $547,775 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization, including debt cost78,094 65,627 
Allowance for credit loss2,133 1,695 
Equity in losses of unconsolidated affiliates4,030 685 
Stock-based compensation20,323 19,114 
Gain on sale of property and equipment(748)(755)
Deferred income taxes(3,309)6,003 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable(186,559)(152,763)
Vehicle pooling costs(21,268)(29,623)
Inventories8,001 (8,589)
Prepaid expenses, other current and non-current assets(29,176)(19,889)
Operating lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities414 657 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities27,619 10,741 
Deferred revenue3,709 (309)
Income taxes receivable49,430 4,577 
Income taxes payable7,615 1,655 
Other liabilities— (53)
Net cash provided by operating activities499,833 446,548 
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment(256,719)(156,200)
Purchase of assets in connection with acquisitions— (469)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment16,343 1,252 
Investment in unconsolidated affiliate(1,993)— 
Purchase of held to maturity securities— (374,866)
Net cash used in investing activities(242,369)(530,283)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options10,815 11,985 
Proceeds from the issuance of Employee Stock Purchase Plan shares5,363 5,022 
Payments for employee stock-based tax withholdings(831)(599)
Payments of finance lease obligations(13)(314)
Net cash provided by financing activities15,334 16,094 
Effect of foreign currency translation3,918 (8,968)
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash276,716 (76,609)
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at beginning of period1,384,236 1,048,260 
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at end of period$1,660,952 $971,651 
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Interest paid$706 $9,311 
Income taxes paid, net of refunds$98,324 $128,972 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
7

Copart, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
January 31, 2018
(Unaudited)
2023
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation and Description of Business
Copart, Inc. (the Company)(“the Company”) provides vehicle sellers with a full range of services to process and sell vehicles over the Internetinternet through the Company’s Virtual Bidding Third Generation (VB3) Internet(“VB3”) internet auction-style sales technology. Sellers areVehicle sellers consist primarily of insurance companies, but also include banks, finance companies, charities, fleet operators, dealers, vehicle rental companies, and vehicles sourced directly from individual owners.individuals. The Company sells principally to licensed vehicle dismantlers, rebuilders, repair licensees, used vehicle dealers, exporters, and exporters; however, at certain locations, the Company sells directly to the general public. The majority of vehicles sold on behalf of insurance companies are either damaged vehicles deemed a total loss or not economically repairable by the insurance companies or are recovered stolen vehicles for which an insurance settlement with the vehicle owner has already been made. The Company offers vehicle sellers a full range of services that expedite each stage of the vehicle sales process, minimize administrative and processing costs and maximize the ultimate sales price.price through the online auction process. In the United States (U.S.(“U.S.”), Canada, Brazil, the Republic of Ireland, Brazil,Finland, the United Arab Emirates (U.A.E.(“U.A.E.”), Oman, Bahrain, Germany, and Spain,Bahrain, the Company sells vehicles primarily as an agent and derives revenue primarily from auction and auction related sales transaction fees paid bycharged for vehicle sellers and vehicle buyersremarketing services as well as related fees for services subsequent to the auction, such as towingdelivery and storage. In the United Kingdom (U.K.(“U.K.”), Germany, and Spain, the Company operates both as an agent and on a principal basis, in some cases purchasing the salvage vehicles outright from the insurance company and reselling the vehicles for its own account. In Germany and Spain, the Company also derives revenue from sales listing fees for listing vehicles on behalf of insurance companies.companies and insurance experts to determine the vehicle’s residual value and/or to facilitate a sale for the insured.
Principles of Consolidation
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments of a normal recurring nature considered necessary for fair presentation of itsthe Company’s financial position as of January 31, 20182023 and July 31, 2017,2022, its consolidated statements of income, and comprehensive income and stockholders’ equity for the three and six months ended January 31, 20182023 and 2017,2022, and its cash flows for the six months ended January 31, 20182023 and 2017.2022. Interim results for the three and six months ended January 31, 20182023 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any future period, or for the entire year ending July 31, 2018.2023. These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)(“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP)(“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2017.2022. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.
The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of the parent company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, including its foreign wholly-owned subsidiaries. The Company also has a 59.5% voting interest in a company, which was acquired as part of the Cycle Express, LLC acquisition (“majority-owned subsidiary”), which provides various repossession services for the powersports auction industry. The noncontrolling interest consists of a 40.5% outside voting interest in this majority-owned subsidiary. Net income or loss of the majority-owned subsidiary is allocated to the members’ interests in accordance with the operating agreement. The accounts and balances of the majority-owned subsidiary have been consolidated with those of the Company. Significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

On March 23, 2017,October 3, 2022, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a two-for-one common stock split effected in the form of a stock dividend. The additionaldividend subject to and contingent upon, among other things, obtaining stockholder approval of an amendment to the Company’s certificate of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares resulting fromof common stock. On October 31, 2022, the Company’s stockholders approved such increase at a special meeting of stockholders. As such, on November 3, 2022, the Company effected the two-for-one stock split were distributed after the close of trading on April 10, 2017dividend to stockholders of record on April 3, 2017.as of October 6, 2022. The stock dividend increased the number of shares of common stock outstanding and all share and per share amounts have been adjusted for the stock dividend as of the date earliest presented in these financial statements.outstanding. Certain prior year amounts have been retroactively adjusted to conform to current year presentation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP)GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptionsjudgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates include, but are not limited to, vehicle pooling costs; self-insured reserves; allowance for doubtful accounts; income taxes; revenue recognition; stock-based payment compensation; purchase price allocations; long-lived asset and goodwill impairment calculations; and contingencies. Actual results couldmay differ from these estimates.

8

Revenue Recognition
The Company’s primary performance obligation is the auctioning of consigned vehicles through an online auction process. Service revenue and vehicle sales revenue are recognized at the date the vehicles are sold at auction, excluding annual registration fees. Costs to prepare the vehicles for auction, including inbound transportation costs and titling fees, are deferred and recognized at the time of revenue recognition at auction.
The Company’s disaggregation between service revenues and vehicle sales at the segment level reflects how the nature, timing, amount and uncertainty of its revenues and cash flows are impacted by economic factors. The Company providesreports sales taxes on relevant transactions on a portfolio of services to its buyers (“members”) and sellers that facilitate the sale and delivery of a vehicle from seller to buyer. These services include the ability to usenet basis in the Company’s Internetconsolidated results of operations, and therefore does not include sales technologytaxes in revenues or costs.
Service revenues
The Company’s service revenue consists of auction and auction related sales transaction fees charged for vehicle remarketing services. Within this revenue category, the Company’s primary performance obligation is the auctioning of consigned vehicles through an online auction process. These auction and auction related services may include a combination of vehicle purchasing fees, vehicle listing fees, and vehicle delivery, loading, title processing, preparation and storage. The Company evaluates multiple-element arrangements relative to its member and seller agreements.
The services provided to the seller ofselling fees that can be based on a vehicle involve disposing of a vehicle on the seller’s behalf and, under mostpredetermined percentage of the Company’s current contracts, collecting the proceeds from the member. The Company applies Accounting Standard Update 2009-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605): Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements (ASU 2009-13) for revenue recognition. Pre-sale services, including towing, title processing, preparation and storage, as well as salevehicle sales price, tiered vehicle sales price driven fees, and other enhancement services meet the criteria for separate units of accounting. Revenue associated with each service is recognized upon completion of the respective service, net of applicable rebates or allowances. For certain sellers who are chargedat a proportionatefixed fee based on the high bidsale of each vehicle regardless of the selling price of the vehicle; transportation fees for the cost of transporting the vehicle to or from the Company’s facility; title processing and preparation fees; vehicle storage fees; bidding fees; and vehicle loading fees. These services are not distinct within the context of the contract. Accordingly, revenue associated with the pre-salefor these services is recognized uponwhen the single performance obligation is satisfied at the completion of the sale when the total arrangement is fixed and determinable.auction process. The estimated selling priceCompany does not take ownership of each service is determined based on management’s best estimate and allotted based on the relative selling price method.
Vehicle sales, wherethese consigned vehicles, which are purchased and remarketed onstored at the Company’s own behalf,facilities located throughout the U.S. and at its international locations. These fees are recognized onas net revenue (not gross vehicle selling price) at the sale date, which is typicallytime of auction in the pointamount of high bid acceptance. Upon high bid acceptance, a legally binding contract is formed with the member, and the gross sales price is recorded as revenue.such fees charged.
The Company also provides a number of services to the buyer of the vehicle, charginghas a separate fee for each service. Each of these services has been assessedperformance obligation related to determine whetherproviding access to its online auction platform as the requirements have been met to separate them into units of accounting within a multiple-element arrangement. The Company has concluded that the sale and the post-sale services are separate units of accounting. The fees for sale services are recognized upon completion of the sale, and the fees for the post-sale services are recognized upon successful completion of those services using the relative selling price method.
The Company also charges members an annual registration fee for the right to participate in its vehicle sales program, whichonline auctions and access the Company’s bidding platform. This fee is recognized ratably over the term of the arrangement, and relist and late-payment fees, which are recognized upon receiptgenerally one year, as each day of payment byaccess to the member. online auction platform represents the best depiction of the transfer of the service.
No provision for returns has been established, as all sales are final with no right of return or warranty, although the Company provides for bad debtcredit loss expense in the case of non-performance by its membersbuyers or sellers.
Three Months Ended January 31,Six Months Ended January 31,
(In thousands)2023202220232022
Service revenues
United States$705,733 $630,707 $1,357,390 $1,221,465 
International84,064 80,383 159,247 157,443 
Total service revenues$789,797 $711,090 $1,516,637 $1,378,908 
Vehicle sales
Certain vehicles are purchased and remarketed on the Company’s own behalf. The Company allocates arrangement consideration based upon management’s best estimatehas a single performance obligation related to the sale of these vehicles, which is the completion of the sellingonline auction process. Vehicle sales revenue is recognized on the auction date. As the Company acts as a principal in vehicle sales transactions, the gross sales price at auction is recorded as revenue.
Three Months Ended January 31,Six Months Ended January 31,
(In thousands)2023202220232022
Vehicle sales
United States$82,196 $96,679 $179,387 $184,382 
International84,731 59,691 154,072 114,302 
Total vehicle sales$166,927 $156,370 $333,459 $298,684 
Contract assets
The Company capitalizes certain contract assets related to obtaining a contract, where the amortization period for the related asset is greater than one year. These assets are amortized over the expected life of the separate unitscustomer relationship. Contract assets are classified as current or long-term other assets, based on the timing of accounting containedwhen the Company expects to recognize the related revenues and are amortized as an offset to the associated revenues on a straight-line basis. The Company assesses these costs for impairment at least quarterly and as “triggering” events occur that indicate it is more likely than not that an impairment exists. The contract asset costs where the amortization period for the related asset is one year or less are expensed as incurred and recorded within arrangements including multiple deliverables. Significant inputsgeneral and administrative expenses in the Company’s estimatesaccompanying consolidated statements of income.
9

The change in the selling pricecarrying amount of separate units of accounting include market and pricing trends, pricing customization and practices, and profit objectives for the services.contract assets was as follows (In thousands):
Balance as of July 31, 2022$4,778 
Capitalized contract assets during the period25,540 
Costs amortized during the period(2,545)
Effect of foreign currency exchange rates36 
Balance as of January 31, 2023$27,809 
Vehicle Pooling Costs
The Company defers in vehicle pooling costs certain yard operation expensesthat relate directly to the fulfillment of its contracts associated with vehicles consigned to and received by the Company, but not sold as of the end of the period. The Company quantifies the deferred costs using a calculation that includes the number of vehicles at its facilities at the beginning and end of the period, the number of vehicles sold during the period, and an allocation of certain yard operation costs of the period. The primary expenses allocated and deferred are inbound transportation costs, titling fees, certain facility costs, labor, transportation, and vehicle processing. If the allocation factors change, then yard operation expenses could increase or decrease correspondingly in the future. These costs are expensed into yard operations expenses as vehicles are sold in subsequent periods on an average cost basis. Given the fixed cost nature of the Company’s business, there are no direct correlations for increases in expenses or units processed on vehicle pooling costs.
The Company applies the provisions of accounting guidance for subsequent measurement of inventory to its vehicle pooling costs. The provision requires that items such as idle facility expenses, double freight and rehandling costs be recognized as current period charges regardless of whether they meet the criteria of “abnormal” as provided in the guidance. In addition, the guidance requires that the allocation of fixed production overhead to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of production facilities.
In August 2017, Hurricane Harvey hit the Texas Gulf Coast. As a result of the extensive flooding that it caused, the Company expended $62.4 million in additional costs for the six months ended January 31, 2018, for (i) temporary storage facilities, (ii) premiums for subhaulers, (iii) labor costs incurred for overtime, (iv) travel and lodging due to the reassignment of employees to the affected region, and (v) equipment lease expenses to handle the increased volume. These costs, which are characterized as "abnormal" under ASC 330, Inventory, were expensed as incurred and not included in vehicle pooling costs. At the end of the quarter, the majority of the incremental salvage vehicles received as a result of Hurricane Harvey have been sold.

Foreign Currency Translation
The Company records foreign currency translation adjustments from the process of translating the functional currency of the financial statements of its foreign subsidiaries into the U.S. dollar reporting currency. The British pound, Canadian dollar, British pound,Brazilian real, European Union euro, U.A.E. dirham, Bahraini dinar, Omani rial, Brazilian real, Indian rupee, Chinese renminbi and European Union EuroBahraini dinar are the functional currencies of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries as they are the primary currencies within the economic environment in which each subsidiary operates. The original equity investment in the respective subsidiaries is translated at historical rates. Assets and liabilities of the respective subsidiary’s operations are translated into U.S. dollars at period-end exchange rates, and revenues and expenses are translated into U.S. dollars at average exchange rates in effect during each reporting period. Adjustments resulting from the translation of each subsidiary’s financial statements are reported in other comprehensive income.
The cumulative effects of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations were as follows (in(In thousands):
Cumulative loss on foreign currency translation as of July 31, 2016 $(109,194)
Gain on foreign currency translation 8,518
Cumulative loss on foreign currency translation as of July 31, 2017 $(100,676)
Gain on foreign currency translation 21,763
Cumulative loss on foreign currency translation as of January 31, 2018 $(78,913)
Income Taxes and Deferred Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities, their respective tax basis, and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Excess tax benefits and deficiencies related to exercises of stock options are recognized as expense or benefit in the income statement as discrete items in the reporting period in which they occur.
In accordance with the provisions of ASC 740, Income Taxes, a two-step approach is applied to the recognition and measurement of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The first step is to determine if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained in an audit, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes. The second step is to measure the tax position as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in the provision for income taxes on its consolidated statements of income.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents include cash held in checking, domestic certificates of deposit, and money market accounts. The Company periodically invests its excess cash in money market funds and U.S. Treasury Bills. The Company’s cash and cash equivalents are placed with high credit quality financial institutions.
Other Assets
Other assets consist of long-term deposits, contracted prepayments, notes receivable, and investments in unconsolidated affiliates. In accordance with ASC 323, Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures, the Company uses the equity method to account for investments in joint ventures and other unconsolidated entities if the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence over the financial and operating policies of those investees. Under the equity method, the Company records the initial investment in an entity at cost and subsequently adjusts the investment for the Company’s share of the affiliate’s undistributed earnings (losses) and distributions recorded in other income. The Company reviews the carrying amount of the investments in unconsolidated affiliates annually, or whenever circumstances indicate that the value of these investments may have declined. If the Company determines an investment is impaired on an other-than-temporary basis, a loss equal to the difference between the fair value of the investment and its carrying amount is recorded.

Cumulative loss on foreign currency translation as of July 31, 2021$(100,860)
Loss on foreign currency translation(68,505)
Cumulative loss on foreign currency translation as of July 31, 2022$(169,365)
Gain on foreign currency translation12,858 
Cumulative loss on foreign currency translation as of January 31, 2023$(156,507)
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company records its financial assets and liabilities at fair value in accordance with the framework for measuring fair value in U.S. GAAP. In accordance with ASCAccounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, as amended by Accounting Standards Update 2011-04, the Company considers fair value as an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants under current market conditions. This framework establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value:
Level IObservable inputs that reflect unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities traded in active markets.
Level IIInputs other than quoted prices included within Level I that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.
Level IIIInputs that are generally unobservable. These inputs may be used with internally developed methodologies that result in management’s best estimate.
Level I    Observable inputs that reflect unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities traded in active markets.
Level II    Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level I that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.
Level III    Inputs that are generally unobservable. These inputs may be used with internally developed methodologies that result in management’s best estimate.
The amounts recorded for financial instruments in the Company’s consolidated financial statements, which included cash, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities and Revolving Loan Facility approximated their fair values as of January 31, 20182023 and July 31, 2017,2022, due to the short-term nature of those instruments and are classified within Level II of the fair value hierarchy. Cash equivalents are classified within Level II of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices of the underlying investments. See Note 2 – Long-Term Debt,
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Note 4 – Fair Value Measures.Restricted Cash
Capitalized Software Costs
10

The Company capitalizes system development costsconsiders all highly liquid investments purchased with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash, cash equivalents, and website development costs related to enterprise computing services during the application development stage. Costs related to preliminary project activitiesrestricted cash include cash held in checking, U.S. Treasury Bills, and post implementation activities are expensed as incurred. Internal-use software is amortized on a straight-line basis over its estimated useful life, generally three years.money market accounts. The Company evaluatesperiodically invests its excess cash in money market funds and U.S. Treasury Bills. The Company’s cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash are placed with high credit quality financial institutions. The carrying values of the useful lives of these assets on an annual basisCompany’s cash equivalents that were not carried at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets were $1,477.5 million and tests for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances occur that impact the recoverability of these assets.
Total gross capitalized software$1,237.0 million as of January 31, 20182023 and July 31, 2017 was $28.12022, respectively, and fair values of the Company’s cash equivalents that were not carried at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets were $1,478.9 million and $38.5$1,237.3 million respectively. Accumulated amortization expense related to software as of January 31, 20182023 and July 31, 2017 totaled $14.92022, respectively.
NOTE 2 — Acquisitions
Fiscal Year 2022 Transactions
On July 5, 2022, the Company acquired 100% of the voting stock of ILT Project Limited which conducts business primarily as Hills Motors (“Hills”), a leading parts recycler in the United Kingdom. Hills predominantly sells recycled parts to the public. The purchase price paid for Hills was $106.6 million.
The following table summarizes the preliminary fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed for Hills (in thousands).
Cash$8,960 
Accounts receivable and prepaid expenses5,348 
Inventory4,913 
Property and equipment22,259 
Intangible assets15,931 
Goodwill56,051 
Liabilities assumed(6,858)
Fair value of net assets and liabilities acquired$106,604 
The Hills acquisition was undertaken for the strategic fit to the Company. This acquisition has been accounted for using the purchase method in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations, which resulted in the recognition of goodwill in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Goodwill arose because the purchase price reflected a number of factors, including future earnings and cash flow potential; the comparable multiples of earnings, cash flow and other factors at which similar businesses have been purchased by other acquirers; and the complementary strategic fit and resulting synergies brought to existing operations. Goodwill is calculated as the excess of the consideration transferred over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired and is not amortized for financial reporting purposes. The acquisition of Hills is currently undergoing review by the U.K. Competition and Markets Authority. Given the timing of the acquisition the Company has not completed its determination of the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed and the amount shown in the table above are preliminary amounts. The estimates and assumptions used in the preliminary purchase price allocation are subject to change if additional information, which existed as of the acquisition date, becomes known to the Company. However, the Company believes any changes to the preliminary purchase price allocation will not have a material impact to the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations.
The Hills acquisition did not result in a significant change in the Company’s consolidated results of operations; therefore, pro forma financial information has not been presented. The operating results have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations since the acquisition date.
11

NOTE 3 — Accounts Receivable, Net
Accounts receivable, net consisted of:
(In thousands)January 31, 2023July 31, 2022
Advance charges receivable$580,966 $440,650 
Trade accounts receivable160,121 137,243 
Other receivables32,704 7,257 
773,791 585,150 
Less: Allowance for credit loss(8,599)(6,577)
Accounts receivable, net$765,192 $578,573 
Advance charges receivable represents amounts paid to third parties on behalf of insurance companies for which the Company will be reimbursed when the vehicle is sold. As advance charges are recovered within one year, the Company has not adjusted the amount of consideration received from the customer for a significant financing component. Trade accounts receivable includes fees and gross auction proceeds to be collected from insurance companies and buyers.
NOTE 4 — Property and Equipment, Net
Property and equipment, net consisted of the following:
(In thousands)January 31, 2023July 31, 2022
Land$1,647,906 $1,526,446 
Buildings and improvements1,288,499 1,209,331 
Transportation and other equipment459,597 429,405 
Office furniture and equipment86,091 84,728 
Software84,054 78,216 
 3,566,147 3,328,126 
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization(909,874)(842,362)
Property and equipment, net$2,656,273 $2,485,764 
Depreciation expense on property and equipment was $36.5 million and $25.7$31.4 million respectively. Duringfor the three months ended January 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, and $73.7 million and $61.3 million for the six months ended January 31, 2018,2023 and 2022, respectively.
NOTE 5 – Leases
The Company has both lessee and lessor arrangements. The Company determines whether a contract is or contains a lease at the inception of the contract or at any subsequent modification. A contract will be deemed to be or contain a lease if the contract conveys the right to control and direct the use of identified property, plant, or equipment for a period of time in exchange for consideration. The Company generally must also have the right to obtain substantially all of the economic benefits from the use of the property, plant, and equipment. Depending on the terms, leases are classified as either operating or finance leases if the Company retired fully amortized capitalized softwareis the lessee, or as operating, sales-type, or direct financing leases if the Company is the lessor. Certain of $13.9 million, which were no longer being utilized.the Company’s lessee and lessor leases have renewal options to extend the leases for additional periods at the Company’s discretion.
AcquisitionsLeases - Lessee
The Company recognizesleases certain facilities and measures identifiable assets acquiredcertain equipment under non-cancelable finance and liabilities assumed in acquired entities in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations. The accounting for acquisitions involves significant judgments and estimates, including the fair value of certain forms of consideration, the fair value of acquired intangible assets, which involve projections of future revenues, cash flows and terminal value,operating leases, which are thenrecorded as right-of-use assets and lease liabilities. Certain leases provide the Company with either discounteda right of first refusal to acquire or an option to purchase a facility at fair value. Certain leases also contain escalation clauses and renewal option clauses calling for increased rents. Where a lease contains an estimated discount rateescalation clause or measured at an estimated royalty rate,a concession, such as a rent holiday or tenant improvement allowance, the Company includes these items in the determination of the right-of-use asset and the fair valuelease liabilities. The effects of other acquired assetsthese escalation clauses or concessions have been reflected in lease expense on a straight-line basis over the expected lease term and assumed liabilities, including potential contingencies andany variable lease payments subsequent to establishing the useful liveslease liability are expensed as incurred. The lease term commences on the date when the Company has the right to control the use of the assets. The projectionsleased property, which is typically before lease payments are developed using internal forecasts, available industry and market data and estimates of long-term growth rates ofdue under the Company. Historical experience is additionally utilized, in which historical or current costs have approximated fair value for certain assets acquired.
Segments and Other Geographic Reporting
The Company’s U.S. and International regions are considered two separate operating segments and are disclosed as two reportable segments. The segments represent geographic areas and reflect how the chief operating decision maker allocates resources and measures results, including total revenues, operating income and income before income taxes. The segments continue to share similar business models, services and economic characteristics.
NOTE 2 – Long-Term Debt
Credit Agreement
On December 3, 2014, the Company entered into a Credit Agreement (as amended from time to time, the “Credit Amendment”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, and Bank of America, N.A., as syndication agent. The Credit Agreement provided for (a) a secured revolving loan facility in an aggregate principal amount of up to $300.0 million (the “Revolving Loan Facility”), and (b) a secured term loan facility in an aggregate principal amount of $300.0 million (the “Term Loan”), which was fully drawn at closing. The Term Loan amortized $18.8 million per quarter.

On March 15, 2016, the Company entered into a First Amendment to Credit Agreement (the “Amendment to Credit Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent and Bank of America, N.A. The Amendment to Credit Agreement amended certain terms of the Credit Agreement, dated as of December 3, 2014. The Amendment to Credit Agreement provided for (a) an increase in the secured revolving credit commitments by $50.0 million, bringing the aggregate principal amountlease. Certain of the revolving credit commitments underCompany’s leases have renewal periods up to 40 years, exercisable at the Credit AgreementCompany’s option, and generally require the Company to $350.0 million, (b) a new securedpay property taxes, insurance and maintenance costs, in addition to the lease payments. At lease inception, the Company includes all renewals or option periods that are reasonably certain to exercise when determining the expected lease term, loan (the “Incremental Term Loan”) inas failure to renew the aggregate principal amountlease would impose an economic penalty.
12

Operating lease assets and liabilities are recognized at the lease commencement date of March 15, 2021, and (c) an extension of the termination date of the Revolving Loan Facility and the maturity date of the Term Loan from December 3, 2019 to March 15, 2021. The Amendment to Credit Agreement extended the amortization period for the Term Loan, and decreased the quarterly amortization payments for that loan to $7.5 million per quarter. The Amendment to Credit Agreement additionally reduced the pricing levels under the Credit Agreement to a range of 0.15% to 0.30% in the case of the commitment fee, 1.125% to 2.0% in the case of the applicable margin for LIBOR loans, and 0.125% to 1.0% in the case of the applicable margin for base rate loans, based on the Company’s consolidated total net leverage ratio duringpresent value of lease payments over the preceding fiscal quarter. The Company borrowedexpected lease term. To determine the entire $93.8 million principal amountpresent value of the Incremental Term Loan concurrent with the closing of the Amendment to Credit Agreement.
On July 21, 2016,lease payments not yet paid, the Company entered into a Second Amendment to Credit Agreement (the “Second Amendment to Credit Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, SunTrust Bank, and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent (as successor in interest to Wells Fargo Bank). The Second Amendment to Credit Agreement amends certain terms of the Credit Agreement, dated as of December 3, 2014 as amended by the Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of March 15, 2016. The Second Amendment to Credit Agreement provides for, among other things, (a) an increase in the secured revolving credit commitments by $500.0 million, bringing the aggregate principal amount of the revolving credit commitments under the Credit Agreement to $850.0 million, (b) the repayment of existing term loans outstanding under the Credit Agreement, (c) an extension of the termination date of the revolving credit facility under the Credit Agreement from March 15, 2021 to July 21, 2021, and (d) increased covenant flexibility.
Concurrent with the closing of the Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, the Company prepaid in full the outstanding $242.5 million principal amount of the Term Loan and Incremental Term Loan under the Credit Agreement without premium or penalty. The Second Amendment to Credit Agreement reduced the pricing levels under the Credit Agreement to a range of 0.125% to 0.20% in the case of the commitment fee, 1.00% to 1.75% in the case of the applicable margin for LIBOR loans, and 0.0% to 0.75% in the case of the applicable margin for base rate loans, in each case depending on the Company’s consolidated total net leverage ratio. The principal purposes of these financing transactions were to increase the size and availability under the Company’s Revolving Loan Facility and to provide additional long-term financing. The proceeds are being used for general corporate purposes, including working capital and capital expenditures, potential share repurchases, acquisitions, or other investments relating to the Company’s expansion strategies in domestic and international markets.
The Revolving Loan Facility under the Credit Agreement bears interest, at the election of the Company, at either (a) the Base Rate, which is defined as a fluctuating rate per annum equal to the greatest of (i) the Prime Rate in effect on such day; (ii) the Federal Funds Rate in effect on such date plus 0.50%; or (iii) an adjusted LIBOR rate determined on the basis of a one-month interest period plus 1.0%, in each case plus an applicable margin ranging from 0.0% to 0.75%estimates incremental borrowing rates based on the Company’s consolidated total net leverage ratio during the preceding fiscal quarter; or (b) an adjusted LIBOR rate plus an applicable margin ranging from 1.00% to 1.75% depending oninformation available at lease commencement date, as rates are not implicitly stated in the Company’s consolidated total net leverage ratio during the preceding fiscal quarter. Interest is due and payable quarterly, in arrears, for loans bearing interest at the Base Rate, and at the endleases.
Components of an interest period (or at each three month interval in the case of loans with interest periods greater than three months) in the case of loans bearing interest at the adjusted LIBOR rate. The interest ratelease expense were as follows:
Three Months Ended January 31,Six Months Ended January 31,
(In thousands)2023202220232022
Operating lease expense$6,687 $6,943 $13,547 $13,997 
Finance lease expense:
Amortization of right-of-use assets155 12 309 
Interest on finance lease liabilities— — 
Short-term lease expense1,134 1,723 2,303 3,491 
Variable lease expense314 330 553 554 
Total lease expense$8,140 $9,153 $16,415 $18,355 
Supplemental cash flow information related to leases as of January 31, 2018 on2023 were as follows:
Six Months Ended January 31,
(In thousands)20232022
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities
Operating cash flows related to operating leases$13,178 $13,344 
Operating cash flows related to finance leases— 
Financing cash flows related to finance leases13 314 
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities8,597 14,156 
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new finance lease liabilities— — 
Leases - Lessor
The Company’s lessor arrangements include certain facilities and various land locations, of which each qualifies as an operating lease. Certain leases also contain escalation clauses and renewal option clauses calling for increased rents. Where a lease contains an escalation clause or a concession, such as a rent holiday or tenant improvement allowance, the Company’s Revolving Loan Facility wasCompany includes these items in the one month LIBOR rate of 1.56% plus an applicable margin of 1.00%. The carrying amountdetermination of the Credit Agreement is comprisedstraight-line rental income. The effects of borrowings under which interest accrues underthese escalation clauses or concessions have been reflected in lease payments receivable on a fluctuating interest rate structure. Accordingly,straight-line basis over the carrying value approximates fair value at January 31, 2018,expected lease term and was classified within Level IIany variable lease income subsequent to establishing the receivable will be recognized as earned.
The cost of the fair value hierarchy.
Amounts borrowed under the Revolving Loan Facility may be repaid and reborrowed until the maturity date of July 21, 2021. The Company is obligated to pay a commitment fee on the unused portion of the Revolving Loan Facility. The commitment fee rate ranges from 0.125% to 0.20%, depending on the Company’s consolidated total net leverage ratio during the preceding fiscal quarter, on the average daily unused portion of the revolving credit commitment under the Credit Agreement. The Company had $110.7 million and $231.0 million of outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Loan Facilityleased space as of January 31, 20182023 and July 31, 2017,2022 was $51.2 million and $51.2 million, respectively.
The Company’s obligations underaccumulated depreciation associated with the Credit Agreement are guaranteed by certain of the Company’s domestic subsidiaries meeting materiality thresholds set forth in the Credit Agreement. Such obligations, including the guaranties, are secured by substantially all of theleased assets of the Company and the assets of the subsidiary guarantors pursuant to a Security Agreement, dated December 3, 2014, among the Company, the subsidiary guarantors from time to time party thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as collateral agent.
The Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, including covenants that limit or restrict the Company and its subsidiaries’ ability to, among other things, incur indebtedness, grant liens, merge or consolidate, dispose of assets, make investments, make acquisitions, enter into transactions with affiliates, pay dividends, or make distributions on and repurchase stock, in each case subject to certain exceptions. The Company is also required to maintain compliance, measured at the end of each fiscal quarter, with a consolidated total net leverage ratio and a consolidated interest coverage ratio. The Credit Agreement contains no restrictions on the payment of dividends and other restricted payments, as defined, as long as (1) the consolidated total net leverage ratio, as defined,

both before and after giving effect to any such dividend or restricted payment on a pro forma basis, is less than 3.25:1, in an unlimited amount, (2) if clause (1) is not available, so long as the consolidated total net leverage ratio both before and after giving effect to any such dividend on a pro forma basis is less than 3.50:1, in an aggregate amount not to exceed the available amount, as defined, and (3) if clauses (1) and (2) are not available, in an aggregate amount not to exceed $50.0 million; provided, that, minimum liquidity, as defined, shall be not less than $75.0 million both before and after giving effect to any such dividend or restricted payment. As of January 31, 2018, the consolidated total net leverage ratio was 0.56:1. Minimum liquidity as of January 31, 20182023 and July 31, 2022 was $906.6 million. Accordingly,$3.3 million and $2.8 million, respectively. Both the Company does not believe thatleased assets and accumulated depreciation are included in Property and equipment, net on the provisions ofconsolidated balance sheet. Rental income from these operating leases was $4.1 million and $3.7 million for the Credit Agreement represent a significant restriction to its ability to pay dividends or to the successful future operations of the business. The Company has not paid a cash dividend since becoming a public company in 1994. The Company was in compliance with all covenants related to the Credit Agreement as ofthree months ended January 31, 2018.
Note Purchase Agreement
On December 3, 2014,2023 and 2022, respectively, and $8.3 million and $7.2 million for the Company entered into a Note Purchase Agreementsix months ended January 31, 2023 and sold to certain purchasers (collectively, the “Purchasers”) $400.0 million in aggregate principal amount of senior secured notes (the “Senior Notes”) consisting of (i) $100.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.07% Senior Notes, Series A, due December 3, 2024; (ii) $100.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.19% Senior Notes, Series B, due December 3, 2026; (iii) $100.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.25% Senior Notes, Series C, due December 3, 2027;2022, respectively, and (iv) $100.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.35% Senior Notes, Series D, due December 3, 2029. Interest is due and payable quarterly, in arrears, on each of the Senior Notes. Proceeds from the Note Purchase Agreement are being used for general corporate purposes.
On July 21, 2016, the Company entered into Amendment No. 1 to Note Purchase Agreement (the “First Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement”) which amended certain terms of the Note Purchase Agreement, including providing for increased flexibility substantially consistent with the changes included in the Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, including among other things increased covenant flexibility.
The Company may prepay the Senior Notes, in whole or in part, at any time, subject to certain conditions, including minimum amounts and payment of a make-whole amount equal to the discounted value of the remaining scheduled interest payments under the Senior Notes.
The Company’s obligations under the Note Purchase Agreement are guaranteed by certain of the Company’s domestic subsidiaries meeting materiality thresholds set forth in the Note Purchase Agreement. Such obligations, including the guaranties, are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company and the subsidiary guarantors. The obligations of the Company and its subsidiary guarantors under the Note Purchase Agreement will be treated on a pari passu basis with the obligations of those entities under the Credit Agreement as well as any additional debt the Company may obtain.
The Note Purchase Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, including covenants that limit or restrict the Company and its subsidiaries’ ability to, among other things, incur indebtedness, grant liens, merge or consolidate, dispose of assets, make investments, make acquisitions, enter into transactions with affiliates, pay dividends, or make distributions and repurchase stock, in each case subject to certain exceptions. The Company is also required to maintain compliance, measured at the end of each fiscal quarter, with a consolidated total net leverage ratio and a consolidated interest coverage ratio. The Note Purchase Agreement contains no restrictionswithin Service revenues on the paymentconsolidated statements of dividends and other restricted payments, as defined, as long as (1) the consolidated total net leverage ratio, as defined, both before and after giving effect to any such dividend or restricted payment on a pro forma basis, is less than 3.25:1, in an unlimited amount, (2) if clause (1) is not available, so long as the consolidated total net leverage ratio both before and after giving effect to any such dividend on a pro forma basis is less than 3.50:1, in an aggregate amount not to exceed the available amount, as defined, and (3) if clauses (1) and (2) are not available, in an aggregate amount not to exceed $50.0 million; provided, that, minimum liquidity, as defined, shall be not less than $75.0 million both before and after giving effect to any such dividend or restricted payment. As of January 31, 2018, the consolidated total net leverage ratio was 0.56:1. Minimum liquidity as of January 31, 2018 was $906.6 million. Accordingly, the Company does not believe that the provisions of the Note Purchase Agreement represent a significant restriction to its ability to pay dividends or to the successful future operations of the business. The Company has not paid a cash dividend since becoming a public company in 1994. The Company was in compliance with all covenants related to the Note Purchase Agreement as of January 31, 2018.income.
Related to the execution of the Credit Agreement, First Amendment to Credit Agreement, Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, and the Note Purchase Agreement, the Company incurred $3.4 million in costs, of which $2.0 million was capitalized as debt issuance fees and $1.4 million was recorded as a reduction of the long-term debt proceeds as a debt discount. Both the debt issuance fees and debt discount are amortized to interest expense over the term of the respective debt instruments and are classified as reductions of the outstanding liability.

NOTE 36 – Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The following table sets forth amortizable intangible assets by major asset class:
(In thousands) January 31, 2018 July 31, 2017(In thousands)January 31, 2023July 31, 2022
Amortized intangibles:    Amortized intangibles:
Covenants not to compete $1,698
 $1,702
Supply contracts & customer relationships 74,901
 75,462
Trade name 23,970
 23,859
Supply contracts and customer relationshipsSupply contracts and customer relationships$72,196 $71,875 
Trade namesTrade names18,915 18,896 
Licenses and databases 8,616
 5,385
Licenses and databases673 633 
Accumulated amortization (39,251) (30,470)Accumulated amortization(40,598)(36,724)
Net intangibles $69,934
 $75,938
Intangibles, netIntangibles, net$51,186 $54,680 
Aggregate amortization expense on amortizable intangible assets was $3.5$1.9 million and $1.3$1.8 million for the three months ended January 31, 20182023 and 2017,2022, respectively, and $7.4$3.8 million and $2.6$3.7 million for the six months ended January 31, 20182023 and 2017,2022, respectively.
13

The change in the carrying amount of goodwill was as follows (in thousands):follows:
(In thousands)
Balance as of July 31, 2022$401,954 
Effect of foreign currency exchange rates2,092 
Balance as of January 31, 2023$404,046 
NOTE 7 – Long-Term Debt
Balance as of July 31, 2017 $340,243
Goodwill adjustments during the period (Note 11 – Acquisitions)
 (1,266)
Effect of foreign currency exchange rates 5,522
Balance as of January 31, 2018 $344,499
Credit Agreement
NOTE 4 – Fair Value MeasuresOn December 21, 2021, the Company entered into a Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Copart, certain subsidiaries of Copart party thereto, the lenders party thereto, and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent (the “Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement”). The Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement amends and restates certain terms of the First Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of July 21, 2020, by and among Copart, the lenders party thereto, and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent (as successor in interest to Wells Fargo Bank, National Association) (the “Existing Credit Agreement”). The Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement provides for, among other things, (a) an increase in the secured revolving credit commitments by $200.0 million, bringing the aggregate principal amount of the revolving credit commitments under the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Revolving Loan Facility”) to $1,250.0 million, (b) an increase in the letter of credit sublimit from $60.0 million to $100.0 million, (c) addition of Copart UK Limited, CPRT GmbH and Copart Autos España, S.L.U., each a wholly-owned direct or indirect foreign subsidiary of Copart, as borrowers, (d) addition of the ability to borrow under the Second and Amended and Restated Credit Agreement in certain foreign currencies including Pounds Sterling, Euro and Canadian Dollars, (e) extension of the maturity date of the revolving credit facility under the Existing Credit Agreement from July 21, 2023 to December 21, 2026, (f) replacing the LIBOR interest rate applicable to U.S. Dollar denominated borrowings with a SOFR-based interest rate, and (g) changing the pricing levels with respect to the revolving loans as further described below.
The following table summarizesSecond and Amended and Restated Credit Agreement provides for the fair valueRevolving Loan Facility of $1,250.0 million maturing on December 21, 2026 (including up to $550.0 million equivalent of borrowings in Pounds Sterling, Euro and Canadian Dollars) with a $150.0 million equivalent sub-facility available to CPRT GmbH, a $150.0 million equivalent sub-facility available to Copart Autos España, S.L.U. and a $250.0 million equivalent sub-facility available to Copart UK Limited. The proceeds may be used for general corporate purposes, including working capital and capital expenditures, potential share repurchases, acquisitions, or other investments relating to the Company’s expansion strategies in domestic and international markets.
Borrowings under the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement bear interest based on, at our option, either (1) the applicable fixed rate plus 1.00% to 1.75% or (2) the daily rate plus 0.0% to 0.75%, in each case, depending on Copart’s consolidated total net leverage ratio. Additionally, the unused revolving commitments under the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement are subject to the payment of a customary commitment fee at a range of 0.175% to 0.275%, depending on Copart’s consolidated total net leverage ratio. The applicable fixed rates described above with respect to borrowings denominated in (1) U.S. Dollars is SOFR plus certain “spread adjustments” described in the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, (2) Pounds Sterling is SONIA plus certain “spread adjustments” described in the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, (3) Euro is EURIBOR, and (4) Canadian Dollars is CDOR. The Company had no outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Loan Facility as of January 31, 2023 and July 31, 2022.
The Company’s obligations under the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement are guaranteed by certain of the Company’s financialdomestic subsidiaries meeting materiality thresholds set forth in the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. Such obligations, including the guaranties, are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company and liabilitiesthe assets of the subsidiary guarantors pursuant to a Security Documents Confirmation Agreement as part of the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement.
The Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, including covenants that limit or restrict the Company and its subsidiaries’ ability to, among other things, incur indebtedness, grant liens, merge or consolidate, dispose of assets, make investments, make acquisitions, enter into transactions with affiliates, pay dividends, or make distributions on and repurchase stock, in each case subject to certain exceptions. The Company is also required to maintain compliance, measured at the end of each fiscal quarter, with a consolidated total net leverage ratio and recorded at fair valuea consolidated interest coverage ratio. The Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement contains no restrictions on the payment of dividends and other restricted payments, as defined, as long as (1) the consolidated total net leverage ratio, as defined, both before and after giving effect to any such dividend or restricted payment on a recurringpro forma basis, basedis less than 3.25:1, in an unlimited amount, (2) if clause (1) is not available, so long as the consolidated total net leverage ratio both before and after giving effect to any such dividend on inputs useda pro forma basis is less than 3.50:1, in an aggregate amount not to derive their fair values:exceed the available amount, as defined, and (3) if clauses (1) and (2) are not available, in an aggregate amount not to exceed $50.0 million; provided, that, minimum liquidity, as defined, shall be not less than $75.0 million
14

  January 31, 2018 July 31, 2017
(In thousands) Fair Value Total Significant Observable Inputs (Level II) Fair Value Total Significant Observable Inputs (Level II)
Assets        
Cash equivalents $7,571
 $7,571
 $3,498
 $3,498
Total Assets $7,571
 $7,571
 $3,498
 $3,498
Liabilities        
Long-term fixed rate debt, including current portion $387,305
 $387,305
 $400,908
 $400,908
Revolving loan facility 110,700
 110,700
 231,000
 231,000
Total Liabilities $498,005
 $498,005
 $631,908
 $631,908

During the six months endedboth before and after giving effect to any such dividend or restricted payment. As of January 31, 2018,2023, the consolidated total net leverage ratio was (1.05):1. Minimum liquidity available as of January 31, 2023 was $3.0 billion. Accordingly, the Company does not believe that the provisions of the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement represent a significant restriction to its ability to pay dividends or to the successful future operations of the business. The Company has not paid a cash dividend since becoming a public company in 1994. The Company was in compliance with all covenants related to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement as of January 31, 2023.
Related to execution of the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, the Company incurred $2.7 million in costs, which were capitalized as debt issuance fees. The debt discount is amortized to interest expense over the term of the respective debt instruments and is included in other assets on the balance sheet as no transfers were made between any levels withinamounts are outstanding on the fair value hierarchy. See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, and Note 2 – Long-Term Debt.Revolving Loan Facility.

NOTE 58 – Net Income Per Share
The table below reconciles basic weighted average shares outstanding to diluted weighted average shares outstanding:
 Three Months Ended January 31, Six Months Ended January 31,Three Months Ended January 31,Six Months Ended January 31,
(In thousands) 2018 2017 2018 2017(In thousands)2023202220232022
Weighted average common shares outstanding 231,478
 229,142
 231,086
 227,288
Weighted average common shares outstanding476,376 474,372 476,237 474,334 
Effect of dilutive securities - stock options 9,882
 6,446
 8,990
 9,384
Effect of dilutive securitiesEffect of dilutive securities6,160 8,002 6,001 8,154 
Weighted average common and dilutive potential common shares outstanding 241,360
 235,588
 240,076
 236,672
Weighted average common and dilutive potential common shares outstanding482,536 482,374 482,238 482,488 
There were no material adjustments to net income required in calculating diluted net income per share. Excluded from the dilutive earnings per share calculation were 2,287,5003,091,704 and 877,122 shares underlying outstanding300,500 options to purchase the Company’s common stock options for the three months ended January 31, 20182023 and 2017,2022, respectively, and 4,478,0046,247,298 and 1,274,244411,000 options to purchase the Company’s common stock for the six months ended January 31, 20182023 and 2017,2022, respectively, because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.
15

NOTE 69 – Stock-based Payment Compensation
The Company recognizes compensation expense for stock option awards without a market condition on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award. The following is a summary of activity for the Company’s stock options for the six months ended January 31, 2018:2023:
(In thousands, except per share and term data) Shares Weighted Average Exercise Price Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (In years) Aggregate Intrinsic Value(In thousands, except per share and term data)SharesWeighted Average Exercise PriceWeighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (In years)Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding as of July 31, 2017 18,774
 $17.14
 6.48 $269,449
Outstanding as of July 31, 2022Outstanding as of July 31, 202211,394 $29.31 5.50$398,331 
Grants of options 2,348
 36.58
  Grants of options294 65.49 
Exercises (1,194) 14.35
  Exercises(299)36.15 
Forfeitures or expirations (21) 17.72
  Forfeitures or expirations(263)54.34 
Outstanding as of January 31, 2018 19,907
 $19.60
 6.48 $487,199
Exercisable as of January 31, 2018 12,753
 $16.66
 5.71 $349,585
Outstanding as of January 31, 2023Outstanding as of January 31, 202311,126 $29.49 5.01$414,798 
Exercisable as of January 31, 2023Exercisable as of January 31, 20238,910 $24.46 4.33$377,288 
The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying awards and the quoted price of the Company’s common stock. The number of options that were in-the-money was 19,907,31013,689,922 at January 31, 2018.2023.
The table below sets forth the stock-based payment compensation recognized by the Company:
  Three Months Ended January 31, Six Months Ended January 31,
(In thousands) 2018 2017 2018 2017
General and administrative $4,990
 $4,712
 $9,444
 $8,996
Yard operations 1,002
 808
 1,854
 1,609
Total stock-based payment compensation $5,992
 $5,520
 $11,298
 $10,605
In accordance with ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation, the Company made an estimate of expected forfeituresgrants option awards to certain executives that contain service and recognized compensation cost only for those equity awards expected to vest.
In October 2013, the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors, subject to stockholder approval (which was subsequently obtained at the December 16, 2013 annual meeting of stockholders), approved the grant to each of A. Jayson Adair, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, and Vincent W. Mitz, the Company’s President, of nonqualified stockmarket conditions. The options to purchase 4,000,000 and 3,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, respectively, at an exercise price of $17.81 per share, which equaled the closing price of the Company’s common stock on December 16, 2013, the effective date of grant. Such grants were made in lieu of any cash salary or bonus compensation in excess of $1.00 per year or the grant of any additional equity incentives for a five-year period. Each option will become exercisable over five years, subject to continued service by Mr. Adair and Mr. Mitz,the executive, with 20% vesting on April 15, 2015 and December 16, 2014, respectively,the first anniversary of the grant date and the balance vesting monthly over the subsequent four years. Each option will become fully vested, assuming continued service by Mr. AdairSeparate and Mr. Mitz on April 15, 2019 and December 16, 2018, respectively. If, priorapart from the time-based vesting schedule, the options are also subject to a change in control, either executive’s employment is terminated without cause, then 100%market condition requiring the trading price of Copart, Inc. common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market to be greater than or equal to 125% of the shares subject to that executive’s stock option will immediately vest. If, upon or following a change in control, either the Company or a successor entity terminates the executive’s service without cause, or the executive resigns for good reason (as defined in the option agreement), then 100%exercise price of the shares subjectoptions, determined both (i) at the time of any exercise, and (ii) based on the closing price on each of the twenty consecutive trading days preceding the date of any exercise. The exercise price of the options is equivalent to his stock option will immediately vest. On June 2, 2015, the Compensation Committeeclosing price of the Company’s Board of Directors approvedcommon stock on the amendment of each of the stand-alone stock option agreements, by and between the Company and A. Jayson Adair and Vincent W. Mitz, respectively, to remove the provision providing at times prior to a “change in control” for the immediate vesting in full of the underlying option upon an involuntary termination of Mr. Adair or Mr. Mitz, as applicable, without “cause.”grant date. The fair value of each optionthe awards is determined at the grant date of grant using the Black-Scholes Merton option-pricingeither Lattice or Monte Carlo model, was $5.72.risk-free interest rates ranging from 0.71% to 3.57%, estimated volatility ranging from 25.2% to 29.3%, and no expected dividends. The total estimated compensation expense to be recognized by the Company over the five year estimatedfive-year service period for these options is $40.0 million.$48.4 million and will be recognized using the accelerated attribution method over each vesting tranche of the award. The Company recognized $3.6$6.5 million and $3.8$4.6 million in compensation expenses forexpense related to these grantsawards in the six months ended January 31, 20182023 and 2017,2022, respectively.

The following is a summary of activity for the Company’s stock option awards subject to market conditions for the six months ended January 31, 2023:
(In thousands, except per share and term data)SharesWeighted Average Exercise PriceWeighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (In years)Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding as of July 31, 20222,810 $47.83 8.33$45,590 
Grants of options150 65.70 
Exercises— — 
Forfeitures or expirations— — 
Outstanding as of January 31, 20232,960 $48.73 7.92$52,920 
Exercisable as of January 31, 20231,092 $43.09 7.40$25,682 

The table below sets forth the stock-based compensation recognized by the Company for stock options, restricted stock, and restricted unit awards:
Three Months Ended January 31,Six Months Ended January 31,
(In thousands)2023202220232022
General and administrative$8,789 $8,247 $17,536 $16,718 
Yard operations1,342 1,415 2,787 2,396 
Total stock-based compensation$10,131 $9,662 $20,323 $19,114 
The Company’s restricted stock awards (“RSA”) and restricted stock unit awards (“RSU”) have generally been issued with vesting periods ranging from two years to five years and vest solely on service conditions. Accordingly, the Company recognizes compensation expense for RSA and RSU awards on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award.
16

Table of Contents
The following is a summary of activity for the Company’s RSA and RSU for the six months ended January 31, 2023:
(In thousands, except per share data)Restricted SharesWeighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Outstanding as of July 31, 2022354 $60.28 
Grants263 64.01 
Vested(59)57.67 
Forfeitures or expirations(8)53.99 
Outstanding as of January 31, 2023550 $62.44 
NOTE 710 – Stock Repurchases
On September 22, 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an 80a 160 million share increase in the stock repurchase program, bringing the total current authorization to 196392 million shares. The repurchases may be effected through solicited or unsolicited transactions in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. No time limit has been placed on the duration of the stock repurchase program. Subject to applicable securities laws, such repurchases will be made at such times and in such amounts as the Company deems appropriate

and may be discontinued at any time. The Company did not repurchase any shares of its common stock under the program during the six months ended January 31, 20182023 or 2017.2022. As of January 31, 2018,2023, the total number of shares repurchased under the program was 106,913,602,229,098,396, and 89,086,398162,901,604 shares were available for repurchase under the program.
In fiscal 2017
NOTE 11 – Income Taxes
The Company’s effective income tax rates were 21.8% and fiscal 2018, certain executive officers, members of the Company’s Board of Directors and other employees exercised stock options through cashless exercises. A portion of the options exercised were net settled in satisfaction of the exercise price and federal and state statutory tax withholding requirements. The Company remitted $134.6 million18.0% for the six months ended January 31, 20172023 and 2022, respectively, which differs from the U.S. statutory rate of 21% primarily due to state income taxes, deduction for Foreign Derived Intangible Income, and excess tax benefits associated with equity-based compensation. The effective tax rate for the proper taxing authoritiesyear ended July 31, 2022 was also impacted by the filing of amended returns in satisfaction of the employees’ statutory withholding requirements.
The exercised stock options, utilizing a cashless exercise, are summarized in the following table:
Period Options Exercised Weighted Average Exercise Price Shares Net Settled for Exercise 
Shares Withheld for Taxes(1)
 Net Shares to Employees Weighted Average Share Price for Withholding Employee Stock Based Tax Withholding (in 000s)
FY 2017—Q1 18,000,000
 $7.70
 5,408,972
 5,255,322
 7,335,706
 $25.62
 $134,615
FY 2018—Q2 80,000
 $6.54
 11,996
 
 68,004
 $43.60
 $
(1)Shares withheld for taxes are treated as a repurchase of shares for accounting purposes but do not count against the Company’s stock repurchase program.
NOTE 8 – Income Taxescertain jurisdictions.
The Company applies the provisions of the accounting standard for uncertain tax positions to its income taxes. For benefits to be realized, a tax position must be more likely than not to be sustained upon examination. The amount recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement.
As of January 31, 2018, the gross amounts of the Company’s liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits of $27.1 million, including interest and penalties, were classified as long-term income taxes payable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Over the next twelve months, the Company’s existing positions will continue to generate an increase in liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits, as well as a likely decrease in liabilities as a result of the lapse of the applicable statute of limitations and the conclusion of income tax audits. The expected decrease in liabilities relating to unrecognized tax benefits will have a positive effect on the Company’s consolidated results of operations and financial position when realized. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various states and foreign jurisdictions. The Company is currently under examination by certain taxing authorities in the U.S. for fiscal years between 20122014 and 2016.2018. At this time, the Company does not believe that the outcome of any examination will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations and financial position.
The Company’s effective income tax rates were 28.5% and 34.0% for the three months ended January 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and 30.1% and (15.2)% for the six months ended January 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The tax rates in the prior year were impacted primarily from the result of recognizing excess tax benefits from the exercise of employee stock options of $2.6 million and $1.3 million for the three months ended January 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and $6.4 million and $102.7 million for the six months ended January 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The effective tax rate for the three months ended January 31, 2018 was computed based on a reduced blended U.S. federal corporate tax rate of26.9% for the fiscal year ending July 31, 2018, and included the effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Reform” or “Tax Act”). Tax Reform makes broad and complex changes to the U.S. tax code, including, but not limited to (i) reducing the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from 35.0% to 21.0%; (ii) requiring companies to pay a one-time transition tax on certain unrepatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries (“Transition Tax”); (iii) generally eliminating U.S. federal income taxes on dividends from foreign subsidiaries; (iv) creating a new provision designed to tax global intangible low-taxed income (“GILTI”) which allows for the possibility of using foreign tax credits (“FTCs”) and a deduction of up to 50.0% to offset the income tax liability (subject to some limitations); (v) allowing for full expensing of qualified property through bonus depreciation; and (vi) creating limitations on the deductibility of certain executive compensation.
The SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”), which provides guidance on accounting for the tax effects of Tax Reform. SAB 118 provides a measurement period that should not extend beyond one year from enactment for companies to complete the accounting under ASC 740, Income Taxes. In accordance with SAB 118, a company must reflect the income tax effects of those aspects of Tax Reform for which the accounting under ASC 740 is complete in the financial statements. To the extent that a company’s accounting for certain income tax effects of Tax Reform is incomplete, but a reasonable estimate is able to be made, the company must record a provisional estimate in the financial statements. If a company cannot determine a provisional estimate to be included in the financial statements, it should continue to apply ASC 740 on the basis of the tax laws that were in effect immediately before the enactment of Tax Reform.

Because the Company is a fiscal year taxpayer, under IRC Section 15, the blended tax rate the Company used to obtain the benefit of reduced tax rate was 26.9% for the fiscal year ending July 31, 2018. Upon enactment, the Company remeasured its deferred tax balances to reflect the reduced U.S. federal tax rate, which resulted in a tax benefit of $0.6 million. The Company also recorded a provisional tax liability for the Transition Tax of $12.0 million, which after accounting for certain foreign tax credits made available by incurring the Transition Tax, resulted in recording an expense of $10.6 million during the six months ended January 31, 2018.
The Company has not completed its accounting for the tax effects of the enactment of the Tax Act. Specifically, the amount recorded for the Transition Tax is a provisional amount based on the Company’s estimates. The Company expects to complete the accounting for these impacts of the Tax Act in the fiscal quarter ending January 31, 2019 as it finalizes its cumulative earnings and profits of its foreign subsidiaries and receives additional guidance from the IRS pertaining to the Tax Act. The impacts of additional guidance and changes in estimates related to the effects of the Tax Act, if any, will be recorded in the period the additional guidance or information is available.
The Company re-measured deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the U.S, statutory income tax rate. However, the Company is still analyzing certain aspects of the Tax Act and refining its calculation, which could potentially affect the measurement of these balances or potentially give rise to new deferred tax amounts.
Because the GILTI is not applicable until fiscal years after August 1, 2018, no provisional adjustments were recorded. The Tax Act creates a new requirement that GILTI earned by controlled foreign corporations (“CFCs”) must be included currently in the gross income of the CFCs’ U.S. shareholders. GILTI is the excess of the shareholder’s “net CFC tested income” over the net deemed tangible income return which is currently defined as the excess of (i) 10.0% of the aggregate of the U.S. shareholder’s pro rata share of the qualified business asset investment of each CFC over (ii) the amount of certain interest expense taken into account in the determination of net CFC-tested income.
As part of Tax Reform, the Company incurred U.S. tax on substantially all of the earnings of its foreign subsidiaries as part of the Transition Tax. This tax increased the Company’s previously taxed earnings and will allow for the repatriation of the majority of its foreign earnings without any U.S. federal tax. However, any repatriation of its foreign earnings could still have substantial impacts on withholding taxes, state taxes or other income taxes that might be incurred from the potential reversal of the Company’s overall outside basis difference. Accordingly, the Company is reevaluating its previous investment assertions regarding the excess of the amount for financial reporting over the tax basis as a result of Tax Reform. In January 2018, the Company repatriated $51.7 million of earnings that will be considered previously taxed, from the U.K. to the U.S. and concluded that there were no material additional taxes incurred. The Company also expects to repatriate an additional $42.2 million of earnings on or about February 28, 2018, that will be considered previously taxed, from the U.K. to the U.S. and concluded that there were no material additional taxes incurred. As part of its provisional estimate under SAB 118, the Company has not finalized any additional plans to repatriate previously taxed earnings, but may choose to repatriate additional previously taxed earnings, to the extent of its international operations’ cash capacities, in the future. However, the Company’s cash flow needs in the U.S. have not changed significantly for reasons other than those caused by Tax Reform and intends to continue to reinvest its foreign undistributed earnings to expand its international footprint. Accordingly, the Company did not provide any taxes other than the Transition Tax on such earnings as of January 31, 2018.
NOTE 912 – Recent Accounting Pronouncements
PendingPending
In January 2017,On October 28, 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles-Goodwill2021-08, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Accounting for Contract Assets and Other (Topic 350). Contract Liabilities from Contracts with Customers. ASU 2017-04 amends2021-08 creates an exception to the requirement that entities comparegeneral recognition and measurement principle for contract assets and liabilities from contracts with customers acquired in a business combination. Under this exception, an acquirer applies ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, to recognize and measure contract assets and contract liabilities on the impliedacquisition date instead of using fair value of goodwill with its carrying amountthe contract assets and contract liabilities as part of step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. As a result, entities should perform their annual or interim goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount and recognize an impairment if the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. ASU 2017-04 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019.required under ASC 805 Business combinations. The Company’s adoption of ASU 2017-04 will2021-08 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations and financial position.
Adopted
In October 2016,December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, 2019-12, Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes (Topic 740), Intra-Entity Transfers. ASU 2019-12 eliminates certain exceptions related to the approach for intraperiod tax allocation, the methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period and the recognition of Assets Other Than Inventory. ASU 2016-16requires an entity to recognizedeferred tax liabilities for outside basis differences. It also clarifies and simplifies other aspects of the accounting for income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset, other than inventory, when the transfer occurs and eliminates the exception for an intra-entity transfer of an asset, other than inventory.taxes. This ASUguidance is effective for annualfiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, is required to be adopted using a modified retrospective approach; however early adoption is permitted. The Company is continuing its assessment of the impact of ASU 2016-16 may have on the Company’s consolidated results of operations and financial position.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), that supersedes all existing guidance on accounting for leases in ASC Topic 840. ASU 2016-02 is intended to provide enhanced transparency and comparability by requiring lessees to record right-of-use assets and corresponding lease liabilities on the balance sheet. ASU 2016-02 will continue to classify leases as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the statement of income. ASU 2016-02 is effective for annual and interim periods within those annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018 and adoption is to be applied with a modified retrospective approach to each prior reporting period presented with various optional practical expedients; however early adoption is permitted. Based on a preliminary assessment, the Company expects that most of its operating lease commitments will be

subject to the new guidance and recognized as operating lease liabilities and right-of-use assets upon adoption, resulting in a significant increase in the assets and liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The Company is continuing its assessment, which may identify additional impacts ASU 2016-02 may have on the Company’s consolidated results of operations, financial position, and related disclosures.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC 605, Revenue Recognition. ASU 2014-09 is based on the principle that revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual and interim periods within those annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. ASU 2014-09 allows adoption with either retrospective application to each period presented, or retrospective application with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of initial application. ASU 2014-09 will be effective for the Company beginning with the first quarter of fiscal year 2019, the three months ended October 31, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of implementing ASU 2014-09 on the consolidated financial statements, as well as evaluating the transition alternatives.
While the Company is continuing to assess all potential impacts of ASU 2014-09, it currently believes the most significant impact relates to the Company’s performance obligations through the determination of distinct and separately identifiable services, which may be different from the Company’s current separate units of accounting under ASU 2009-13. Additionally, changes in revenue recognition requirements regarding the Company’s performance obligations within its service contracts could potentially result in either the earlier recognition of revenue and associated costs for certain performance obligations or the deferral of a significant portion of revenue and associated costs for a vehicle until the sale is substantially complete. Due to the variety and complexity of the Company’s contracts, the actual revenue recognition treatment required under ASU 2014-09 may be dependent on contract-specific terms and vary in some instances.
Adopted
In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes, which requires companies to classify all deferred tax assets and liabilities as non-current on the balance sheet, rather than separating deferred taxes into current and non-current amounts. This ASU is effective for annual and interim periods within those annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and can be adopted prospectively or retrospectively; however, early adoption is permitted.years. The Company’s adoption of ASU 2015-17 on a prospective basis2019-12 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations and financial position.
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope
17

Table of Modification Accounting, which amends the scope of modification accounting for stock-based payment arrangements and provides guidance on the types of changes to the terms or conditions of stock-based payment awards to which an entity would be required to apply modification accounting under ASC 718. For all entities, this ASU is effective for annual reporting periods, including interim periods within those annual reporting periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in any interim period. The Company’s adoption of ASU 2017-09 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations and financial position.Contents
NOTE 1013 – Legal Proceedings
The Company is subject to threats of litigation and is involved in actual litigation and damage claims arising in the ordinary course of business, such as actions related to injuries, property damage, contract disputes, and handling or disposal of vehicles. TheThere are no material pending legal proceedings to which the Company is a party, or ofwith respect to which any of the Company’s property is subject, include the following matters.
On November 1, 2013, the Company filed suit against Sparta Consulting, Inc. (now known as KPIT) in the 44th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas, alleging fraud, fraudulent inducement, and/or promissory fraud, negligent misrepresentation, unfair business practices pursuant to California Business and Professions Code § 17200, breach of contract, declaratory judgment, and attorney’s fees. The Company seeks compensatory and exemplary damages, disgorgement of amounts paid, attorney’s fees, pre- and post-judgment interest, costs of suit, and a judicial declaration of the parties’ rights, duties, and obligations under the Implementation Services Agreement dated October 6, 2011. The suit arises out of the Company’s September 17, 2013 decision to terminate the Implementation Services Agreement, under which KPIT was to design, implement, and deliver a customized replacement enterprise resource planning system for the Company. On January 2, 2014, KPIT removed this suit to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. On August 11, 2014, the Northern District of Texas transferred the suit to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California for convenience. On January 8, 2014, KPIT filed suit against the Company in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, alleging breach of contract, promissory estoppel, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, account stated, quantum meruit, unjust enrichment, and declaratory relief. KPIT seeks compensatory and exemplary damages, prejudgment interest, costs of suit, and a judicial declaration of the parties’ rights, duties, and obligations under the Implementation Services Agreement. On June 8, 2016, the Company amended its complaint to include claims that KPIT stole certain intellectual property owned by the Company and acted negligently in its provision of services. The Company is pursuing its claim for damages, and defending against KPIT’s claim for damages. The Company and KPIT filed competing motions for summary judgment in January 2017. The Court issued its ruling on

the motions on September 25, 2017. The Company's claims remaining in the case after the ruling include fraud, fraudulent inducement, breach of contract, professional negligence, trade secret misappropriation, unfair competition, unjust enrichment, and computer hacking. KPIT’s claims are now limited to breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and declaratory relief. The case has been set for a jury trial in the Sacramento, California federal court in April 2018.subject.
The Company provides for costs relating to these matters when a loss is probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. The effect of the outcome of theseany such matters on the Company’s future consolidated results of operations and cash flows cannot be predicted because any such effect depends on future results of operations and the amount and timing of the resolution of any such matters. The Company believes that any ultimate liability willregarding existing litigation and claims would not have a material effect on its consolidated results of operations, financial position, or cash flows. However, the amount of the liabilities associated with these claims, if any, cannot be determined with certainty. The Company maintains insurance which may or may not provide coverage for claims made against the Company. There is no assurance that there will be insurance coverage available when and if needed. Additionally, the insurance that the Company carries requires that the Company pay for costs and/or claims exposure up to the amount of the insurance deductibles negotiated when the insurance is purchased.deductibles.
Governmental Proceedings
18
The Georgia Department

Table of Revenue, or DOR, conducted a sales and use tax audit of the Company’s operations in Georgia for the period from January 1, 2007 through June 30, 2011. As a result of their initial audit, the DOR issued a notice of proposed assessment for uncollected sales taxes in which it asserted that the Company failed to collect and remit sales taxes totaling $73.8 million, including penalties and interest.Contents
The Company subsequently engaged a Georgia law firm and outside tax advisors to review the conduct of its business operations in Georgia, the notice of proposed assessment, and the DOR’s policy position. In particular, the Company’s outside legal counsel provided the Company an opinion that the sales for resale to non-U.S. registered resellers should not be subject to Georgia sales and use tax. In rendering its opinion, the Company’s counsel noted that non-U.S. registered resellers are unable to comply strictly with technical requirements for a Georgia certificate of exemption but concluded that its sales for resale to non-U.S. registered resellers should not be subject to Georgia sales and use tax notwithstanding this technical inability to comply. Following the Company’s receipt of the notice of proposed assessment, the Company and its counsel engaged in active discussions with the DOR to resolve the matter.
On August 4, 2015, the DOR issued an official Assessment and Demand for Payment (the “Assessment”) for $96.1 million for sales taxes, penalties, and interest that the DOR alleged the Company owes to the State of Georgia. The Company filed an appeal of this Assessment from the DOR with the Georgia Tax Tribunal on September 3, 2015. On August 5, 2016, the DOR filed a response in which it denied all allegations noted in the Company’s appeal of the Assessment.
During an extended remand period, it was determined that grounds exist for a substantial reduction in the Official Assessment, on the basis that (i) the transactions and resulting tax at issue were erroneously double-counted by the DOR in the audit sales transaction work papers on which the Assessment was based; and (ii) the Company was ultimately able to provide documentation showing that most of the remaining transactions were sales at wholesale, therefore qualifying for the sale for resale exemption from Georgia Sales and Use Tax. After these reductions, the remaining amount of principal Georgia Sales and Use Tax still in dispute between the parties is $2.6 million, plus applicable interest. A Consent Order to this effect was entered by the Georgia Tax Tribunal on May 22, 2017. Since the date of entry of the Consent Order, the Company and the DOR have engaged in discovery, which is expected to be completed in fiscal 2018.
Based on the opinion from the Company’s outside law firm, advice from its outside tax advisors, and the Company’s best estimate of a probable outcome, the Company has adequately provided for the payment of any assessment in its consolidated financial statements. The Company believes it has strong defenses to the remaining tax liability set forth above and intends to continue to defend this matter. There can be no assurance that this matter will be resolved in the Company’s favor or that the Company will not ultimately be required to make a substantial payment to the DOR. The Company understands that litigating and defending the matter in Georgia could be expensive and time-consuming and result in substantial management distraction. If the matter were to be resolved in a manner adverse to the Company, it could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated results of operations and financial position.
NOTE 11 – Acquisitions
During the year ended July 31, 2017, the Company acquired 100% of the voting stock of Cycle Express, LLC, which conducts business primarily as National Powersport Auctions (NPA), a leading non-salvage auction platform for motorcycles, snowmobiles, watercraft and other powersports vehicles. NPA currently operates facilities in Atlanta, Georgia; Cincinnati, Ohio; Dallas, Texas; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and San Diego, California. NPA predominantly auctions pre-owned powersports vehicles on behalf of financing companies, dealers and manufacturers. The Company also acquired the assets of an excavation company, which engages in earthwork, soil stabilization, equipment hauling, and erosion control commercial contractor services. The aggregate purchase price of these acquisitions totaled $160.7 million, net of cash acquired.


During the six months ended January 31, 2018, the purchase price allocations for NPA and the acquisition of the assets of an excavation company were finalized. As a result, from the preliminary purchase price allocation as of July 31, 2017, goodwill decreased $1.3 million, primarily related to a $1.2 million increase in intangible assets and changes to deferred taxes on acquired intangible assets. In accordance with ASC 805, any adjustments to the fair value of acquired assets and liabilities that occur subsequent to the measurement period will be reflected in the Company’s results of operations. There were no acquisitions during the six months ended January 31, 2018.

The NPA acquisition was undertaken because of its attractiveness as an investment as well as its strategic fit with the Company, and the acquisition of certain excavation assets was undertaken to enhance the Company’s land development capabilities. These acquisitions have been accounted for using the purchase method in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations, which resulted in the recognition of goodwill in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Goodwill arose because the purchase price of each acquisition reflected a number of factors, including their future earnings and cash flow potential; the comparable multiples of earnings, cash flow and other factors at which similar businesses have been purchased by other acquirers; the complementary tactical development capability and cost control over the development of the Company’s yard locations; and the complementary strategic fit and resulting synergies brought to existing operations. Goodwill is calculated as the excess of the consideration transferred over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired and is not amortized for financial reporting purposes.

The Company obtained a third party independent valuation to assist in the determination of the fair values of certain assets acquired. The valuation utilized the income approach (specifically the Multi-Period Excess Earnings Method (MPEEM) model and the Relief from Royalty model) to estimate the fair value of acquired supplier relationships and trade names, respectively. The valuation utilized the cost approach to estimate the fair value of acquired software. The valuation of these assets was performed using Level III inputs, as the calculated fair values are based on valuation models that utilize unobservable inputs that are significant to the overall fair value measurement. The unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s best estimate of what hypothetical market participants would use to determine the value of acquired assets based on the best information available in the circumstances. Intangible assets acquired include customer and supplier relationships, trade names, and software with a useful life ranging from three to eleven years. See Note - 3 – Goodwill and Intangible Assets.

These acquisitions did not result in a significant change in the Company’s consolidated results of operations; therefore pro forma financial information has not been presented. The operating results have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations since the acquisition dates.

NOTE 1214 – Segments and Other Geographic Reporting
The Company’s U.S. and International regions are considered two separate operating segments and are disclosed as two reportable segments. The segments represent geographic areas and reflect how the chief operating decision maker allocates resources and measures results, including total revenues and operating income and income before income taxes. The segments continue to share similar business models, services and economic characteristics. Intercompany income (expense) is primarily related to charges for services provided by the U.S. segment.income.
The following tables presenttable presents financial information by segment:
Three Months Ended January 31, 2023Three Months Ended January 31, 2022
(In thousands)United StatesInternationalTotalUnited StatesInternationalTotal
Service revenues$705,733 $84,064 $789,797 $630,707 $80,383 $711,090 
Vehicle sales82,196 84,731 166,927 96,679 59,691 156,370 
Total service revenues and vehicle sales787,929 168,795 956,724 727,386 140,074 867,460 
Yard operations323,397 52,100 375,497 278,093 45,721 323,814 
Cost of vehicle sales79,040 75,687 154,727 90,263 50,041 140,304 
General and administrative49,328 11,647 60,975 46,384 9,630 56,014 
Operating income$336,164 $29,361 $365,525 $312,646 $34,682 $347,328 
Depreciation and amortization$34,121 $4,293 $38,414 $29,316 $3,987 $33,303 
Capital expenditures and acquisitions89,428 14,636 104,064 86,788 5,185 91,973 
Six Months Ended January 31, 2023Six Months Ended January 31, 2022
(In thousands)United StatesInternationalTotalUnited StatesInternationalTotal
Service revenues$1,357,390 $159,247 $1,516,637 $1,221,465 $157,443 $1,378,908 
Vehicle sales179,387 154,072 333,459 184,382 114,302 298,684 
Total service revenues and vehicle sales1,536,777 313,319 1,850,096 1,405,847 271,745 1,677,592 
Yard operations649,641 98,633 748,274 534,714 87,794 622,508 
Cost of vehicle sales171,480 134,359 305,839 170,605 96,107 266,712 
General and administrative96,865 22,090 118,955 92,932 17,991 110,923 
Operating income$618,791 $58,237 $677,028 $607,595 $69,854 $677,449 
Depreciation and amortization$69,057 $8,415 $77,472 $57,046 $8,028 $65,074 
Capital expenditures and acquisitions225,711 31,008 256,719 141,060 15,609 156,669 
January 31, 2023July 31, 2022
(In thousands)United StatesInternationalTotalUnited StatesInternationalTotal
Total assets$5,136,744 $795,664 $5,932,408 $4,615,788 $693,076 $5,308,864 
Goodwill270,269 133,777 404,046 270,269 131,685 401,954 
19
  Three Months Ended January 31, 2018 Three Months Ended January 31, 2017
(In thousands) United States International Total United States International Total
Total service revenues and vehicle sales $385,135
 $73,971
 $459,106
 $286,911
 $62,621
 $349,532
Yard operations 189,378
 27,806
 217,184
 146,195
 22,886
 169,081
Cost of vehicle sales 28,794
 21,519
 50,313
 14,473
 19,213
 33,686
General and administrative 33,953
 6,709
 40,662
 32,651
 5,234
 37,885
Operating income 133,010
 17,937
 150,947
 93,592
 15,288
 108,880
Interest (expense) income, net (5,628) 67
 (5,561) (6,063) 303
 (5,760)
Other (expense) income, net (490) (458) (948) 334
 (3,355) (3,021)
Intercompany income (expense) 53,610
 (53,610) 
 2,947
 (2,947) 
Income before income taxes 180,502
 (36,064) 144,438
 90,810
 9,289
 100,099
Income tax expense (benefit) 37,677
 3,460
 41,137
 31,677
 2,356
 34,033
Net income $142,825
 $(39,524) $103,301
 $59,133
 $6,933
 $66,066
             
Depreciation and amortization $14,054
 $3,817
 $17,871
 $12,667
 $2,548
 $15,215
Capital expenditures, including acquisitions 56,804
 12,617
 69,421
 51,541
 2,662
 54,203

  Six Months Ended January 31, 2018 Six Months Ended January 31, 2017
(In thousands) United States International Total United States International Total
Total service revenues and vehicle sales $736,240
 $142,034
 $878,274
 $571,973
 $123,550
 $695,523
Yard operations 382,211
 52,580
 434,791
 292,548
 44,144
 336,692
Cost of vehicle sales 47,554
 41,056
 88,610
 28,722
 38,051
 66,773
General and administrative 67,446
 12,538
 79,984
 68,129
 10,225
 78,354
Operating income 239,029
 35,860
 274,889
 182,574
 31,130
 213,704
Interest (expense) income, net (11,116) 157
 (10,959) (11,924) 542
 (11,382)
Other (expense) income, net (4,601) (763) (5,364) 89
 222
 311
Intercompany income (expense) 55,914
 (55,914) 
 5,655
 (5,655) 
Income before income taxes 279,226
 (20,660) 258,566
 176,394
 26,239
 202,633
Income tax expense (benefit) 71,262
 6,443
 77,705
 (36,626) 5,913
 (30,713)
Net income $207,964
 $(27,103) $180,861
 $213,020
 $20,326
 $233,346
             
Depreciation and amortization $27,583
 $6,190
 $33,773
 $25,053
 $4,871
 $29,924
Capital expenditures, including acquisitions 95,709
 15,073
 110,782
 88,062
 4,350
 92,412
  January 31, 2018 July 31, 2017
(In thousands) United States International Total United States International Total
Total assets $1,659,901
 $483,640
 $2,143,541
 $1,514,018
 $468,483
 $1,982,501
Goodwill 257,896
 86,603
 344,499
 259,162
 81,081
 340,243

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this Form 10-Q to “Copart,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our” refer to Copart, Inc.
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including the information incorporated by reference herein, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). All statements other than statements of historical facts are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “intend,” “forecast,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. The forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and situations that may cause our or our industry’s actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these statements. These forward-looking statements are made in reliance upon the safe harbor provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These factors include those listed in Part I,II, Item 1A. under the caption entitled “Risk Factors” in this Form 10-Q and those discussed elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this Form 10-Q to “Copart,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our” refer to Copart, Inc. We encourage investors to review these factors carefully together with the other matters referred to herein, as well as in the other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC)“SEC”). We may from time to time make additional written and oral forward-looking statements, including statements contained in our filings with the SEC. We do not undertake to update any forward-looking statement that may be made from time to time by or on behalf of us.
Although we believe that, based on information currently available to us and our management, the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.
Overview
We are a leading provider of online auctions and vehicle remarketing services with operations in the United States (U.S.(“U.S.”), Canada, the United Kingdom (U.K.(“U.K.”), Brazil, the Republic of Ireland, Brazil, Germany, Finland, the United Arab Emirates (U.A.E.(“U.A.E.”), Oman, Bahrain, and Spain.
Our goals are to generate sustainable profits for our stockholders, while also providing environmental and social benefits for the world around us. With respect to our environmental stewardship, we believe our business is a critical enabler for the global re-use and recycling of vehicles, parts, and raw materials. We are not responsible for the carbon emissions resulting from new vehicle manufacturing, governmental fuel emissions standards or vehicle use by consumers. Each vehicle that enters our business operations already exists, with whatever fuel technology and efficiency it was designed and built to have, and the substantial carbon emissions associated with the vehicle’s manufacture have already occurred. However, upon our receipt of an existing vehicle, we help decrease its total environmental impact by extending its useful life and thereby avoiding the carbon emissions associated with the alternative of new vehicle and auto parts manufacturing. For example, many of the cars we process and remarket are subsequently restored to drivable condition, reducing the new vehicle manufacturing burden the world would otherwise face. Many of our cars are purchased by dismantlers, who recycle and refurbish parts for vehicle repairs, again reducing new and aftermarket parts manufacturing. And finally, some of our vehicles are returned to their raw material inputs through scrapping, reducing the need for further new resource extraction. In each of these cases, our business reduces the carbon and other environmental footprint of the global transportation industry.
Beyond our environmental stewardship, we also support the world’s communities in two important ways. First, we believe that we contribute to economic development and well-being by enabling more affordable access to mobility around the world. For example, many of the automobiles sold through our auction platform are purchased for use in developing countries where affordable transportation is a critical enabler of education, health care, and well-being more generally. Secondly, because of the special role we play in responding to catastrophic weather events, we believe we contribute to disaster recovery and resilience in the communities we serve. For example, we mobilized our people, and engaged with a multitude of service providers to timely retrieve, store, and remarket tens of thousands of flood-damaged vehicles in South Florida in the wake of Hurricane Ian in the fall of 2022.
We provide vehicle sellers with a full range of services to process and sell vehicles primarily over the Internetinternet through our Virtual Bidding Third Generation Internetinternet auction-style sales technology, which we refer to as VB3. Vehicle sellers consist primarily of insurance companies, but also include banks, finance companies, charities, fleet operators, dealers, vehicle rental companies, and vehicles sourced directly from individual owners.individuals. We sell the vehicles principally to licensed vehicle dismantlers, rebuilders, repair licensees, used vehicle dealers, and exporters, and at certain locations, to the general public. The majority of the vehicles sold on behalf of insurance companies are either damaged vehicles deemed a total loss orloss; not economically repairable by the insurance companies,companies; or are recovered stolen vehicles for which an insurance settlement with the vehicle owner has already been made. We offer vehicle sellers a full range of services that help expedite each stage of the vehicle sales process, minimize administrative and processing costs, and maximize the ultimate sales price.price through the online auction process.
20

In the U.S., Canada, Brazil, the Republic of Ireland, Brazil,Finland, the U.A.E., Oman, Bahrain, Germany, and Spain,Bahrain, we sell vehicles primarily as an agent and derive revenue primarily from auction and auction related sales transaction fees paid bycharged for vehicle buyers (“members”) and vehicle sellersremarketing services as well as related fees for services subsequent to the auction, such as towingdelivery and storage. In the U.K., Germany, and Spain we operate both as an agent and on a principal basis, in some cases purchasing the salvage vehicles outright from the insurance companies and reselling the vehicles for our own account. In Germany and Spain, we also derive revenue from sales listing fees for listing vehicles on behalf of many insurance companies.companies and insurance experts to determine the vehicle’s residual value and/or to facilitate a sale for the insured.
We monitor and analyze a number of key financial performance indicators in order to manage our business and evaluate our financial and operating performance. Such indicators include:
Service and Vehicle Sales Revenue: Our service revenue consists of auction and auction related sales transaction fees charged tofor vehicle sellersremarketing services. These auction and auction related services may include a combination of vehicle purchasing fees, vehicle listing fees, and vehicle buyers, transportation revenue, purchased vehicle revenue, and other remarketing services. Revenues from sellers are generally generated eitherselling fees that can be based on a predetermined percentage of the vehicle sales price, tiered vehicle sales price driven fees, or at a fixed fee contract basis, where our fees are fixed based on the sale of each vehicle regardless of the selling price of the vehicle or under our Percentage Incentive Program, which we refer to as PIP, where our fees are generally based on a predetermined percentage of the vehicle sales price. Under the consignment or fixed fee program, we generally charge an additional fee for title processing and special preparation. We may also charge additionalvehicle; transportation fees for the cost of transporting the vehicle to or from our facility,facility; title processing and preparation fees; vehicle storage fees; bidding fees; and vehicle loading fees. These fees are recognized as net revenue (not gross vehicle selling price) at the time of the vehicle, and other incidental costs not includedauction in the consignment fee. Under the consignment program, only theamount of such fees associated with vehicle processing are recorded in revenue, not the actual sales price (gross proceeds). Sales transaction fees also include fees charged to vehicle buyers for purchasing vehicles, storage, loading, and annual registration. Transportation revenue includes charges to sellers for towing vehicles under certain contracts and towing charges assessed to buyers for delivering vehicles.charged. Purchased vehicle revenue includes the gross sales price of the vehiclevehicles which we have purchased or are otherwise considered to own, and is primarily generated in the U.K.own. We have certain contracts with insurance companies, primarily in the U.K., in which we act as a principal, purchasing vehicles and reselling them for our own account. We also purchase vehicles in the open market, primarily from individuals, and resell them for our own account.

Our revenue is impacted by several factors, including total loss frequency and the average vehicle auction selling price, as a significant amount of our service revenue is associated in some manner with the ultimate selling price of the vehicle. Vehicle auction selling prices are driven primarily by: (i) market demand for rebuildable, driveable vehicles; (ii) used car pricing, which we also believe has an impact on total loss frequency; (iii) end market demand for recycled and refurbished parts as reflected in demand from dismantlers; (iv) the mix of cars sold; (v) changes in the U.S. dollar exchange rate to foreign currencies, which we believe has an impact on auction participation by international buyers; (vi) restrictions within the global supply chain; and (vii) changes in commodity prices, particularly the per ton price for crushed car bodies, as we believe this has an impact on the ultimate selling price of vehicles sold for scrap and vehicles sold for dismantling; (ii) used car pricing, which we also believe has an impact on total loss frequency; (iii) the mix of cars sold; and (iv) changes in the U.S. dollar exchange rate to foreign currencies, which we believe has an impact on auction participation by international buyers.dismantling. We cannot specifically quantify the financial impact that commodity pricing, used car pricing, and product sales mix has on the selling price of vehicles, our service revenues, or financial results. Total loss frequency is the percentage of cars involved in accidents that insurance companies salvage rather than repair and is driven by the relationship between repairsrepair costs, used car values, and auction returns. Over the last severalpast 30 years we believe there has been an increase in overall growth in the salvage market driven by an increase in total loss frequency. TheThis increase in total loss frequency may have been driven by the declinechanges in used car values relative toand repair costs over the same long-term horizon, which we believe are generally trending upward. Conversely,Recently we have noted fluctuations in total loss frequency. Nonetheless, we believe the long-term trend of increases in total loss frequency will continue. In the near term changes in used car prices such as occurred during the most recent recession,and repair cost, may decreasetend to reduce total loss frequency and adverselythereby affect our growth rate. Used car values are determined by many factors, including used car supply, which is tied directly to new car sales, and the average age of cars on the road. The average age of cars on the road has continued to increase, growing from 9.6 years in 2002 to 11.612.2 years in 2016.2022. Repair costs are generally based on damage severity, vehicle complexity, repair parts availability, repair parts costs, labor costs, and repair shop lead times. The factors that can influence repair costs, used car pricing, and auction returns are many and varied and we cannot predict their movements. Accordingly, we cannot predict future trends in total loss frequency.movements with precision.
Operating Costs and Expenses: Yard operations expenses consist primarily of operating personnel (which includes yard management, clerical, and yard employees), rent, contract; rent; vehicle towing, insurance, fuel,transportation; insurance; property related taxes; fuel; equipment maintenance and repair,repair; marketing costs directly related to the auction process; and costs of vehicles sold under the purchase contracts.General and administrative expenses consist primarily of executive management, accounting,management; accounting; data processing,processing; sales personnel, human resources,personnel; professional fees, researchservices; marketing expenses; and development,system maintenance and marketing expenses.enhancements.
Other Income and Expense: Other income consists primarily includesof interest income from the rental of certain real property, on T-bills,foreign exchange rate gains and losses, andlosses; gains and losses from the disposal of assets, which will fluctuate based on the nature of these activities each period. Other expense consists primarily ofperiod; fees and interest expense on long-term debt. See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 2 – Long-Term Debt.the credit facility, and earnings from unconsolidated affiliates.
Liquidity and Cash Flows: Our primary source of working capital is cash operating results and debt financing.results. The primary source of our liquidity is our cash and cash equivalents and Revolving Loan Facility. The primary factors affecting cash operating results are: (i) seasonality; (ii) market wins and losses; (iii) supplier mix; (iv) accident frequency; (v) total loss frequency; (vi) increased volume from our existing suppliers; (vii) commodity pricing; (viii) used car pricing; (ix) foreign currency exchange rates; (x) product mix; (xi) contract mix to the extent applicable; and (xii) our capital expenditures.expenditures; and (xiii) other macroeconomic factors. These factors are further discussed in the Results of Operations and Risk Factors sections of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Potential internal sources of additional working capital and liquidity are the sale of assets or the issuance of shares through option exercises and shares issued under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan. A potential external source of additional working capital and liquidity is the issuance of additional debt with new lenders andor equity. However, we cannot predict if these sources will be available in the future or on commercially acceptable terms.
21



Acquisitions and New Operations
As part of our overall expansion strategy of offering integrated services to vehicle sellers, we anticipate acquiring and developing facilities in new regions, as well as the regions currently served by our facilities. We believe that these acquisitions and openings will strengthen our coverage, as we have facilities located in the U.S., Canada, the U.K., Brazil, the Republic of Ireland, Germany, Finland, the U.A.E., Oman, Bahrain, Germany,and Spain and the Republic of Ireland with the intention of providing nationalglobal coverage for our sellers. All of these acquisitions have been accounted for using the purchase method of accounting.
The following table setstables set forth operational facilities that we have acquired or opened and began operationsare now operational from August 1, 20162021 through January 31, 2018:
2023:
United States LocationsAcquisition or GreenfieldDateGeographic Service AreaDate
Brighton, Colorado (Denver)GreenfieldAugust 2016United States
Sun Valley, California (Los Angeles)GreenfieldNovember 2016United States
Casper, WyomingGreenfieldJanuary 2017United States
Littleton, Colorado (Denver)GreenfieldJanuary 2017United States
Apopka, Florida (Orlando)GreenfieldJanuary 2017United States
Alorton, Illinois (St. Louis)GreenfieldFebruary 2017United States
Okeechobee, FloridaGreenfieldMarch 2017United States
Ogden, Utah (Salt Lake City)GreenfieldMarch 2017United States
Wilmington, California (Long Beach)GreenfieldMarch 2017United States
Cycle Express, LLC (1)
AcquisitionJune 2017United States
Andrews, Texas (Midland)GreenfieldAugust 2017United States
Exeter, Rhode IslandGreenfieldOctober 2017United States
Bad Fallingbostel, Germany (Hanover)GreenfieldSeptember 2016Germany
Newbury, United KingdomGreenfieldSeptember 2016United Kingdom
Betim, Minas GeraisGreenfieldApril 2017Brazil
(1)Cycle Express, LLC conducts business primarily as National Powersport Auctions (NPA), a leading non-salvage auction platform for motorcycles, snowmobiles, watercraft and other powersports vehicles. NPA currently operates facilities in Atlanta, Georgia; Cincinnati, Ohio; Dallas, Texas; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and San Diego, California.
Mobile SouthAlabamaAugust 2021
MadisonWisconsinOctober 2021
AugustaGeorgiaApril 2022
Milwaukee SouthWisconsinMay 2022
Punta GordaFloridaJune 2022
AnchorageAlaskaAugust 2022
Rapid CitySouth DakotaAugust 2022
Kansas CityMissouriSeptember 2022
GrenadaMississippiJanuary 2023
International LocationsGeographic Service AreaDate
Barcelona, SpainSpainSeptember 2021
Halifax, Novia ScotiaCanadaApril 2022
Büdingen, HesseGermanyJanuary 2023
The following table sets forth the operational facilities obtained through business acquisitions from August 1, 2021 through January 31, 2023:
LocationsGeographic Service AreaDate
Skelmersdale, EnglandUnited KingdomJuly 2022
Dumfries, EnglandUnited KingdomJuly 2022
The period-to-period comparability of our consolidated operating results and financial position is affected by business acquisitions, new openings, weather and product introductions during such periods. In particular, we have certain contracts inherited through our U.K. acquisitions that require us to act as a principal, purchasing vehicles from the insurance companies and reselling them for our own account. It has been our practice and remains our intention, where possible, to migrate these types of contracts to the agency model in future periods. Changes in the amount of revenue derived in a period from principal transactions relative to total revenue will impact revenue growth and margin percentages.
In addition to growth through business acquisitions, we seek to increase revenues and profitability by, among other things, (i) acquiring and developing additional vehicle storage facilities in key markets, including foreign markets; (ii) pursuing global, national, and regional vehicle seller agreements; (iii) increasing our service offerings to sellers and members;offerings; and (iv) expanding the application of VB3 into new markets. In addition, we implement our pricing structure and auction procedures, and attempt to introduce cost efficiencies at each of our acquired facilities by implementing our operational procedures, integrating our management information systems, and redeploying personnel, when necessary.
22

Table of Contents

Results of Operations
The following table shows certain data from our consolidated statements of income expressed as a percentage of total service revenues and vehicle sales for the three and six months ended January 31, 20182023 and 2017:2022:
Three Months Ended January 31,Six Months Ended January 31,
(In percentages)2023202220232022
Service revenues and vehicle sales:
Service revenues83 %82 %82 %82 %
Vehicle sales17 %18 %18 %18 %
Total service revenues and vehicle sales100 %100 %100 %100 %
Operating expenses:
Yard operations39 %37 %40 %37 %
Cost of vehicle sales16 %16 %17 %16 %
General and administrative%%%%
Total operating expenses61 %59 %63 %60 %
Operating income39 %41 %37 %40 %
Other income (expense)%(1)%%(1)%
Income before income taxes40 %40 %38 %39 %
Income taxes%%%%
Net income31 %34 %30 %32 %
  Three Months Ended January 31, Six Months Ended January 31,
  2018 2017 2018 2017
Service revenues and vehicle sales:        
Service revenues 88 % 89 % 88 % 89 %
Vehicle sales 12 % 11 % 12 % 11 %
Total service revenues and vehicle sales 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 %
         
Operating expenses:        
Yard operations 47 % 48 % 50 % 48 %
Cost of vehicle sales 11 % 10 % 10 % 10 %
General and administrative 9 % 11 % 9 % 11 %
Total operating expenses 67 % 69 % 69 % 69 %
Operating income 33 % 31 % 31 % 31 %
Other expense (1)% (2)% (2)% (2)%
Income before income taxes 32 % 29 % 29 % 29 %
Income taxes 9 % 10 % 9 % (4)%
Net income 23 % 19 % 20 % 33 %
Comparison of the Three and Six Months Ended January 31, 20182023 and 20172022
The following table presents a comparison of service revenues for the three and six months ended January 31, 20182023 and 2017:2022:
Three Months Ended January 31,Six Months Ended January 31,
(In thousands)20232022Change% Change20232022Change% Change
Service revenues
United States$705,733 $630,707 $75,026 11.9 %$1,357,390 $1,221,465 $135,925 11.1 %
International84,064 80,383 3,681 4.6 %159,247 157,443 1,804 1.1 %
Total service revenues$789,797 $711,090 $78,707 11.1 %$1,516,637 $1,378,908 $137,729 10.0 %
   Three Months Ended January 31, Six Months Ended January 31,
(In thousands) 2018 2017 Change % Change 2018 2017 Change % Change
Service revenues                
 United States $355,541
 $271,959
 $83,582
 30.7% $686,933
 $542,230
 $144,703
 26.7%
 International 46,413
 38,074
 8,339
 21.9% 89,146
 74,881
 14,265
 19.1%
 Total service revenues $401,954
 $310,033
 $91,921
 29.6% $776,079
 $617,111
 $158,968
 25.8%
Service Revenues. The increase in service revenuesrevenue during the three months ended January 31, 20182023 of $91.9$78.7 million, or 29.6%11.1%, as compared to the same period last year resulted from (i) an increase in the U.S. of $83.6$75.0 million and (ii) an increase in International of $8.3$3.7 million. The growth in the U.S. was driven primarily by (i) increased volume and (ii) an increase in revenue per car due to higher average auction selling prices, which we believe isdriven by the relative scarcity of vehicles due to global supply chain disruptions and a change in the mix of vehicles sold and higher commodity prices. The increase in volume in the U.S. was derived from (i) growth in the number of units sold from new and expanded contracts with insurance companies, (ii) growth from existing suppliers, driven by what we believe was an increase in total loss frequency and (iii) Hurricane Harvey, as the storm produced an extraordinary volume of flood damaged vehicles.volume. Excluding the beneficialunfavorable impact of $3.2$7.0 million due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily from the change in the British pound andEuropean Union euro, Canadian dollar and British Pound to U.S. dollar exchange rates, net against a favorable impact of the Brazilian Real to the U.S. dollar exchange rate, the growth in International of $5.1 million was driven primarily by increasedan increase in volume resulting from higher miles driven and a marginalan increase in revenue per car.car due to a change in mix of vehicles sold.
The increase in service revenues during the six months ended January 31, 2018 2023of $159.0$137.7 million,or 25.8%10.0%, as compared to the same period last year resulted from (i) an increase in the U.S. of $144.7$135.9 millionand (ii) an increase in International of $14.3$1.8 million.The growth in the U.S. was driven primarily by(i) increased volume and (ii) an increase in revenue per car due to higher average auction selling prices, which we believe is due to a change in the mix of vehicles sold and higher commodity prices. The increase in volume inrestrictions within the U.S. was derived from (i) growth in the number of units sold from newglobal supply chain for automobiles and expanded contracts with insurance companies, (ii) growth from existing suppliers, driven by what we believe was an increase in total loss frequency and (iii) Hurricane Harvey, as the storm produced an extraordinary volume of flood damaged vehicles.volume. Excluding the beneficialunfavorable impact of $4.2$17.9 million due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily from the change in the British pound andEuropean Union euro, Canadian dollar and British Pound to U.S. dollar exchange rates, net against a favorable impact of the Brazilian Real to the U.S. dollar exchange rate, the growth in International of $10.1 million was driven primarily by increasedan increase in revenue per car due to a change in mix of vehicles sold and an increase in volume.

The following table presents a comparison of vehicle sales for the three and six months ended January 31, 20182023 and 2017:2022:
23

 Three Months Ended January 31, Six Months Ended January 31,Three Months Ended January 31,Six Months Ended January 31,
(In thousands)(In thousands) 2018 2017 Change % Change 2018 2017 Change % Change(In thousands)20232022Change% Change20232022Change% Change
Vehicle salesVehicle sales                Vehicle sales
United States $29,594
 $14,952
 $14,642
 97.9% $49,307
 $29,743
 $19,564
 65.8%United States$82,196 $96,679 $(14,483)(15.0)%$179,387 $184,382 $(4,995)(2.7)%
International 27,558
 24,547
 3,011
 12.3% 52,888
 48,669
 4,219
 8.7%International84,731 59,691 25,040 41.9 %154,072 114,302 39,770 34.8 %
Total vehicle sales $57,152
 $39,499
 $17,653
 44.7% $102,195
 $78,412
 $23,783
 30.3%Total vehicle sales$166,927 $156,370 $10,557 6.8 %$333,459 $298,684 $34,775 11.6 %
Vehicle Sales.The increase in vehicle sales for the three months ended January 31, 20182023 of $17.7$10.6 million, or 44.7%6.8%, as compared to the same period last year resulted from (i) an increasea decrease in the U.S. of $14.6$14.5 million and an (ii) an increase in International of $3.0$25.0 million. The increasedecrease in the U.S. was primarily the(i) driven by a decrease in volume as a result of increased volumea proactive approach to mitigate principle unit exposure and (ii) offset by higher average auction selling prices, which we believe was due to a change in the mix of vehicles sold and higher commodity prices.sold. Excluding a beneficialan unfavorable impact of $2.3$7.9 million due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily from the unfavorable change in the British pound and European Union Euroeuro, Canadian dollar and British Pound to U.S. dollar exchange rates, the growthincrease in International of $0.7 million was primarily the result of higher average auction selling prices, partially offset bywhich we believe was due to a decreasechange in mix of vehicles sold and an increase in volume.
The increase in vehicle sales for thesix months ended January 31, 20182023 of $23.8$34.8 million, or 30.3%11.6%, as compared to the same period last year, resulted from (i) an increasea decrease in the U.S. of $19.6$5.0 million and (ii) an increase in International of $4.2$39.8 million.The increasea decrease in the U.S. was primarily(i) the result of increaseda decrease in volume andas a result of a proactive approach to mitigate principle unit exposure, offset by higher average auction selling prices, which we believe was due to a change in the mix of vehicles sold and higher commodity prices.sold. Excluding a beneficialan unfavorable impact of $3.0$20.7 million due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily from the unfavorable change in the British pound and European Union Euroeuro, Canadian dollar and British Pound to U.S. dollar exchange rates, the growthincrease in International of $1.2 million was primarily the result of (i) an increase in volume and (ii) higher average auction selling prices, partially offset bywhich we believe was due to a decreasechange in volume.mix of vehicles sold combined with increased prices resulting from the restrictions within the global supply chain for automobiles.
The following table presents a comparison of yard operations expenses for the three and six months ended January 31, 20182023 and 2017:
2022:
 Three Months Ended January 31, Six Months Ended January 31,Three Months Ended January 31,Six Months Ended January 31,
(In thousands)(In thousands) 2018 2017 Change % Change 2018 2017 Change % Change(In thousands)20232022Change% Change20232022Change% Change
Yard operations expensesYard operations expenses                Yard operations expenses
United States $189,378
 $146,195
 $43,183
 29.5% $382,211
 $292,548
 $89,663
 30.6%United States$323,397 $278,093 $45,304 16.3 %$649,641 $534,714 $114,927 21.5 %
International 27,806
 22,886
 4,920
 21.5% 52,580
 44,144
 8,436
 19.1%International52,100 45,721 6,379 14.0 %98,633 87,794 10,839 12.3 %
Total yard operations expenses $217,184
 $169,081
 $48,103
 28.4% $434,791
 $336,692
 $98,099
 29.1%Total yard operations expenses$375,497 $323,814 $51,683 16.0 %$748,274 $622,508 $125,766 20.2 %
                
Yard operations expenses, excluding depreciation and amortizationYard operations expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization                Yard operations expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization
United States $180,899
 $138,390
 $42,509
 30.7% $365,141
 $277,186
 $87,955
 31.7%United States$293,472 $253,596 $39,876 15.7 %$589,322 $487,612 $101,710 20.9 %
International 24,392
 20,974
 3,418
 16.3% 47,221
 40,341
 6,880
 17.1%International47,955 41,928 6,027 14.4 %90,522 80,158 10,364 12.9 %
                
Yard depreciation and amortizationYard depreciation and amortization                Yard depreciation and amortization
United States $8,479
 $7,806
 $673
 8.6% $17,070
 $15,362
 $1,708
 11.1%United States$29,925 $24,497 $5,428 22.2 %$60,319 $47,102 $13,217 28.1 %
International 3,414
 1,911
 1,503
 78.6% 5,359
 3,803
 1,556
 40.9%International4,145 3,793 352 9.3 %8,111 7,636 475 6.2 %
Yard Operations Expenses. Expenses. The increase in yard operations expense for the three months ended January 31, 20182023 of $48.1$51.7 million, or 28.4%16.0%, as compared to the same period last year resulted from (i) an increase in the U.S. of $43.2$45.3 million primarily from growthand (ii) increase in International of $6.4 million. The increase in the U.S. compared to the same period last year relates to an increase in volume andcombined with an increase in the cost to process each car; and (ii) ancar. The increase in International of $4.9 million, primarily from a marginal increase in the cost to process each car growthwas driven by increased subhaul costs primarily in relation to the fluctuation of fuel costs, and labor costs. The increase in International relates primarily to an increase in volume and the detrimentalan increase in subhaul and labor costs. Excluding a favorable impact of $1.7$4.0 million due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily from the favorable change in the European Union euro, and British poundPound to U.S. dollar exchange rate. The increase in the cost to process each car in the U.S. was primarily driven by abnormal costs of $26.6 million for temporary storage facilities; premiums for subhaulers; labor costs incurred from overtime; travel and lodging due to the reassignment of employees to the affected region; and equipment lease expenses to handle the increased volume associated with Hurricane Harvey, as the storm produced extraordinary volumes of flood damaged vehicles. These costs do not include normal expenses associated with the increased unit volume created by the hurricane, which are deferred until the sale of the units and are recognized as vehicle pooling costs on the balance sheet. Included in yard operations expenses were depreciation and amortization expenses. The increase in yard operations depreciation and amortization expenses during the three months ended January 31, 2023 as compared to the same period last year resulted primarily from depreciating new yard and excavation equipmentexpanded facilities placed into service in the U.S. and International locations.

24

Table of Contents
Theincrease in yard operations expense for the six months ended January 31, 20182023 of $98.1$125.8 million, or 29.1%20.2%, as compared to the same period last year resulted from (i) an increase in the U.S. of $89.7$114.9 million, primarily fromand (ii) an increase in International of $10.8 million. The increase in the U.S. compared to the same period last year relates to an increase in volume combined with an increase in the cost to process each car and growth in volume; and (ii) ancar. The increase in International of $8.4 million, primarily from a marginal increase in the cost to process each car growthwas driven by increased subhaul costs primarily related to the fluctuation of fuel costs, and labor costs, combined with an increase in premiums for catastrophic related subhaul, labor costs incurred from overtime, and increased travel, lodging, and equipment lease cost associated with Hurricane Ian. The increase in International relates primarily to an increase in volume and the detrimentalan increase in subhaul and labor costs. Excluding a favorable impact of $2.3$10.4 million due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily from the favorable change in the European Union euro and British poundPound to U.S. dollar exchange rate. The increase in the cost to process each car in the U.S. was primarily driven by abnormal costs of $62.4 million for temporary storage facilities; premiums for subhaulers; labor costs incurred from overtime; travel and lodging due to the reassignment of employees to the affected region; and equipment lease expenses to handle the increased volume associated with Hurricane Harvey, as the storm produced extraordinary volumes of flood damaged vehicles. These costs do not include normal expenses associated with the increased unit volume created by the hurricane, which are deferred until the sale of the units and are recognized as vehicle pooling costs on the balance sheet. Included in yard operations expenses were depreciation and amortization expenses. The increase in yard operations depreciation and amortization expenses during the six months ended January 31, 2023 as compared to the same period last year resulted primarily from depreciating new yard and excavation equipmentexpanded facilities placed into service in the U.S. and International locations.
The following table presents a comparison of cost of vehicle sales for the three and six months ended January 31, 20182023 and 2017:2022:
Three Months Ended January 31,Six Months Ended January 31,
(In thousands)20232022Change% Change20232022Change% Change
Cost of vehicle sales
United States$79,040 $90,263 $(11,223)(12.4)%$171,480 $170,605 $875 0.5 %
International75,687 50,041 25,646 51.2 %134,359 96,107 38,252 39.8 %
Total cost of vehicle sales$154,727 $140,304 $14,423 10.3 %$305,839 $266,712 $39,127 14.7 %
   Three Months Ended January 31, Six Months Ended January 31,
(In thousands) 2018 2017 Change % Change 2018 2017 Change % Change
Cost of vehicle sales                
 United States $28,794
 $14,473
 $14,321
 98.9% $47,554
 $28,722
 $18,832
 65.6%
 International 21,519
 19,213
 2,306
 12.0% 41,056
 38,051
 3,005
 7.9%
 Total cost of vehicle sales $50,313
 $33,686
 $16,627
 49.4% $88,610
 $66,773
 $21,837
 32.7%
Cost of Vehicle Sales.The increase in cost of vehicle sales for the three months ended January 31, 20182023 of $16.6$14.4 million, or 49.4%10.3%, as compared to the same period last year resulted from (i) a decrease in the U.S. of $11.2 million and (ii) an increase in International of $25.6 million. The decrease in the U.S. was primarily the result of a decrease in volume as a result of a proactive approach to mitigate principle unit exposure, offset by higher average purchase prices, which we believe was due to a change in the mix of vehicles sold, and increased demand. Excluding the favorable impact of $6.8 million due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily from the favorable change in the European Union euro, and British Pound to U.S. dollar exchange rates, the increase in International of $25.6 million was primarily driven by higher average purchase prices due to the change in mix of vehicles sold, increased demand, and an increase in volume.
Theincrease in cost of vehicle sales for thesix months ended January 31, 2023 of $39.1 million, or 14.7%, as compared to the same period last year resulted from (i) an increase in the U.S. of $14.3$0.9 million and (ii) an increase in International of $2.3$38.3 million. The increase in the U.S. was primarily the result of increased volume and higher average purchase prices, which we believe iswas due to higher commodity pricesincreased demand and a change in the mix of vehicles sold.sold, offset by decrease in volume as result of purchase price pressure. Excluding the detrimentalfavorable impact of $1.8$17.6 million due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily from the favorable change in the British pound and European Union Euroeuro, and British Pound to U.S. dollar exchange rates, the increase in International of $0.5$38.3 million was primarily the result ofdue to higher average purchase prices, partially offset by a decrease in volume.
The increase in cost of vehicle sales for the six months ended January 31, 2018 of $21.8 million, or 32.7%, as compared to the same period last year resulted from (i) an increase in the U.S. of $18.8 million and (ii) an increase in International of $3.0 million. The increase in the U.S. was primarily the result of increased volume, and higher average purchase prices which we believe is due to higher commodity prices and athe change in the mix of vehicles sold. Excluding the detrimental impact of $2.3 million due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily from the change in the British pound and European Union Euro to U.S. dollar exchange rates, the increase in International of $0.2 million was primarily the result of higher average purchase prices, partially offset by a decrease in volume.
The following table presents a comparison of general and administrative expenses for the three and six months ended January 31, 20182023 and 2017:2022:
Three Months Ended January 31,Six Months Ended January 31,
(In thousands)20232022Change% Change20232022Change% Change
General and administrative expenses
United States$49,328 $46,384 $2,944 6.3 %$96,865 $92,932 $3,933 4.2 %
International11,647 9,630 2,017 20.9 %22,090 17,991 4,099 22.8 %
Total general and administrative expenses$60,975 $56,014 $4,961 8.9 %$118,955 $110,923 $8,032 7.2 %
General and administrative expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization
United States$45,132 $41,566 $3,566 8.6 %$88,128 $82,989 $5,139 6.2 %
International11,499 9,436 2,063 21.9 %21,785 17,599 4,186 23.8 %
General and administrative depreciation and amortization
United States$4,196 $4,819 $(623)(12.9)%$8,738 $9,944 $(1,206)(12.1)%
International148 194 (46)(23.7)%304 392 (88)(22.4)%
25

Table of Contents
   Three Months Ended January 31, Six Months Ended January 31,
(In thousands) 2018 2017 Change % Change 2018 2017 Change % Change
General and administrative expenses                
 United States $33,953
 $32,651
 $1,302
 4.0 % $67,446
 $68,129
 $(683) (1.0)%
 International 6,709
 5,234
 1,475
 28.2 % 12,538
 10,225
 2,313
 22.6 %
 Total general and administrative expenses $40,662
 $37,885
 $2,777
 7.3 % $79,984
 $78,354
 $1,630
 2.1 %
                  
General and administrative expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization                
 United States $28,378
 $27,790
 $588
 2.1 % $56,933
 $58,439
 $(1,506) (2.6)%
 International 6,306
 4,597
 1,709
 37.2 % 11,707
 9,156
 2,551
 27.9 %
                  
General and administrative depreciation and amortization                
 United States $5,575
 $4,861
 $714
 14.7 % $10,513
 $9,690
 $823
 8.5 %
 International 403
 637
 (234) (36.7)% 831
 1,069
 (238) (22.3)%

General and Administrative Expenses.The increase in general and administrative expenses for the three months ended January 31, 20182023 of $2.8$5.0 million, or 7.3%8.9%, as compared to the same period last year resulted from (i) an increase in International of $1.5$2.0 million, and (ii) an increase in the U.S. of $1.3$2.9 million. Excluding depreciation and amortization, the increase in International of $1.7$2.1 million resulted primarily from growthincreases in professional services and labor costs associated with international expansion, and thelegal costs. The increase in the U.S. of $0.6$3.6 million resulted primarily a result of the acquisition of Cycle Express, LLC, partially offset by decreasesfrom increases in professional services expenseslabor costs and charges related to sales tax and franchise tax adjustments. The increase in depreciationlegal costs. Depreciation and amortization expenses for the three months ended January 31, 20182023 as compared to the same period last year resulted primarilydeclined slightly driven from amortizingfully depreciating certain intangible assets from the Cycle Express, LLC acquisition, partially offset by certainand technology assets becoming fully amortized in the U.S. and international locations.
The increase in general and administrative expenses for the six months ended January 31, 20182023 of $1.6$8.0 million, or 2.1%7.2%, as compared to the same period last year resulted from (i) an increase in International of $2.3$4.1 million partially offset byand (ii) a decreasean increase in the U.S. of $0.7$3.9 million. Excluding depreciation and amortization, the increase in International of $2.6$4.2 million resulted primarily from growthincreases in professional services andstock compensation, labor costs, associated with international expansion,legal costs, travel costs and the decreasemarketing costs. The increase in the U.S. of $1.5$5.1 million resulted primarily from a decreaseincreases in payroll taxes from the exercise of employee stock options, partially offset by increases due to the acquisition of Cycle Express, LLC. The increase in depreciationcompensation, labor costs, legal and travel costs. Depreciation and amortization expenses for the six months ended January 31, 20182023 as compared to the same period last year resulted primarilydeclined slightly driven from amortizingfully depreciating certain intangible assets from the Cycle Express, LLC acquisition, partially offset by certainand technology assets becoming fully amortized in the U.S. and international locations.
The following table summarizes total other expenses and income taxesexpense for the three and six months ended January 31, 20182023 and 2017:2022:
Three Months Ended January 31,Six Months Ended January 31,
(In thousands)20232022Change% Change20232022Change% Change
Total other income (expense)$11,578 $(5,273)$16,851 319.6 %$13,178 $(9,568)$22,746 237.7 %
  Three Months Ended January 31, Six Months Ended January 31,
(In thousands) 2018 2017 Change % Change 2018 2017 Change % Change
Total other expenses (6,509) (8,781) 2,272
 25.9% (16,323) (11,071) (5,252) (47.4)%
Income taxes 41,137
 34,033
 7,104
 20.9% 77,705
 (30,713) 108,418
 353.0 %
Other Expenses. Expense.The decreaseincrease in total other expensesincome for the three months ended January 31, 20182023 of $2.3$16.9 million as compared to the same period last year was primarily due to a decrease inhigher interest income earned from T-bills offset by unrealized foreign currency losses, primarily due to the change in the British pound to U.S. dollar exchange rate.losses.
The increase in total other expensesincome for the six months ended January 31, 20182023 of $5.3$22.7 millionas compared to the same period last year was primarily due to an increase inhigher interest income earned from T-bills offset by unrealized foreign currency losses, primarily due tolosses.
The following table summarizes income taxes for the change in the British pound to U.S. dollar exchange rate,three and losses on the disposal of certain non-operating assets.six months ended January 31, 2023 and 2022:
Three Months Ended January 31,Six Months Ended January 31,
(In thousands)20232022Change% Change20232022Change% Change
Income taxes$83,426 54,643 28,783 52.7 %150,681 120,106 30,575 25.5 %
Income Taxes.Our effective income tax rates were 28.5%22.1% and 34.0%16.0% for the three months ended January 31, 20182023 and 2017,2022, respectively, and 30.1%,21.8% and (15.2)%18.0% for the six months ended January 31, 20182023 and 2017,2022, respectively. The effective tax rates in the current and prior year were impacted primarilyby the recognition of excess tax benefits from the resultstock-based compensation. The recognition of recognizing excess tax benefits from the exercise of employee stock options of $2.6is $0.1 million and $1.3$4.0 million for the three months ended January 31, 20182023 and 2017,2022, respectively, and $6.4$0.7 million and $102.7$7.0 million for the six months ended January 31, 20182023 and 2017,2022, respectively. The current quarter effective tax rate in the prior year was computed based onalso impacted by the reduced blended U.S. federal corporate tax ratefiling of 26.9% for the fiscal year ending July 31, 2018, and included the effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Reform” or “Tax Act”). See Note 8 – Income Taxesamended returns in certain jurisdictions for a detailed discussionbenefit of the Tax Act.$17.5 million.
26

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following table presents a comparison of key components of our liquidity and capital resources at January 31, 20182023 and July 31, 20172022 and for the six months ended January 31, 20182023 and 2017,2022, respectively, excluding additional funds available to us through our Revolving Loan Facility:
(In thousands) January 31, 2018 July 31, 2017 Change % Change(In thousands)January 31, 2023July 31, 2022Change% Change
Cash and cash equivalents $195,300
 $210,100
 $(14,800) (7.0)%
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cashCash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash$1,660,952 $1,384,236 $276,716 20.0 %
Working capital 291,428
 285,108
 6,320
 2.2 %Working capital2,151,158 1,761,566 389,592 22.1 %
 Six Months Ended January 31,Six Months Ended January 31,
(In thousands) 2018 2017 Change % Change(In thousands)20232022Change% Change
Operating cash flows $186,393
 $155,528
 $30,865
 19.8 %Operating cash flows$499,833 $446,548 $53,285 11.9 %
Investing cash flows (107,970) (93,076) (14,894) (16.0)%Investing cash flows(242,369)(530,283)287,914 54.3 %
Financing cash flows (101,032) (40,349) (60,683) (150.4)%Financing cash flows15,334 16,094 (760)(4.7)%
        
Capital expenditures, including acquisitions $(110,782) $(92,412) $(18,370) (19.9)%
Net (repayments) proceeds on revolving loan facility (120,300) 72,000
 (192,300) (267.1)%
Capital expenditures and acquisitionsCapital expenditures and acquisitions$(256,719)$(156,669)$(100,050)(63.9)%
Cash, and cash equivalents, decreasedand restricted cash and working capital increased $276.7 million and $389.6 million at January 31, 20182023, respectively, as compared to July 31, 20172022. Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash increased primarily due to cash generated from operations and proceeds from the exercisestock option exercises not fully offset by capital expenditures. Working capital increased primarily from cash generated from operations and timing of stock options,cash receipts and payments, partially offset by capital expenditures, certain income tax benefits related to stock option exercises, and net repayments on our Revolving Loan Facility.timing of cash payments. Cash equivalentsequivalents consisted of bank deposits, domestic certificates of deposit, U.S. Treasury Bills, and funds invested in money market accounts, which bear interest at variable rates.
Historically, we have financed our growth through cash generated from operations, public offerings of common stock, equity issued in conjunction with certain acquisitions and debt financing. Our primary source of cash generated by operations is from the collection of sellers’ fees, members’service fees and reimbursable advancesfunds received from the proceedssale of vehicle sales. Our business is seasonal as inclement weather during the winter months increases the frequency of accidents and consequently, the number of cars involved in accidents which the insurance companies salvage rather than repair. During the winter months, most of our facilities process 10% to 30% more vehicles than at other times of the year. This increased volume requires the increased use of our cash to pay out advances and handling costs of the additional business.vehicles. We expect to continue to use cash flows from operations to finance our working capital needs and to develop and grow our business. In addition to our stock repurchase program, we are considering a variety of alternative potential uses for our remaining cash balances and our cash flows from operations. These alternative potential uses include additional stock repurchases, repayments of long-term debt,acquisitions and the payment of dividends, and acquisitions.dividends. For further detail, see Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 27 – Long-Term Debtand Note 710 – Stock Repurchasesand under the subheadings “Credit Agreement” and “Note Purchase Agreement” below.
Our business is seasonal as inclement weather during the winter months increases the frequency of accidents and consequently, the number of cars involved in accidents which the insurance companies salvage rather than repair. During the winter months, most of our facilities process 5% to 20% more vehicles than at other times of the year. Severe weather events, including but not limited to tornadoes, hurricanes, and hailstorms, can also impact our volumes. These increased volumes require the increased use of our cash to pay out advances and handling costs of the additional business.
We believe that our currently available cash and cash equivalents and cash generated from operations will be sufficient to satisfy our operating and working capital requirements for at least the next 12 months.foreseeable future. We expect to acquire or develop additional locations and expand some of our current facilities in the foreseeable future. We may be required to raise additional cash through drawdowns on our Revolving Loan Facility or issuance of additionalpotentially issue equity to fund this expansion. Although the timing and magnitude of growth through expansion and acquisitions are not predictable, the opening of new greenfield yards is contingent upon our ability to locate property that (i) is in an area in which we have a need for more capacity; (ii) has adequate size given the capacity needs; (iii) has the appropriate shape and topography for our operations; (iv) is reasonably close to a major road or highway; and (v) most importantly, has the appropriate zoning for our business. Costs to develop a new yard can range from $3.0 to $50.0 million, depending on size, location and developmental infrastructure requirements.
As of January 31, 2018, $148.52023, $113.6 million of the $195.3 million$1.7 billion of cash, and cash equivalents, and restricted cash was held by our foreign subsidiaries. Prior to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Reform” or “Tax Act”) on December 22, 2017, ifIf these funds wereare needed for our operations in the U.S., we would have been required to accrue and pay U.S. taxes to repatriate these funds. However, the Tax Act imposed a one-time deemed repatriation transition tax on the undistributed and previously untaxed portion of those funds. As such, a portion of these funds are availablecould still be subject to be repatriated intothe foreign withholding tax following the U.S. without further accrual or payment of U.S. taxes, ifTax Reform. However, our intent is to permanently reinvest these funds were needed for operations inoutside of the U.S. Ourand our current plans do not require repatriation to fund our U.S. operations. See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 8 – Income Taxesfor further discussion regarding U.S. tax reform and its corresponding impact on foreign cash repatriation.
Net cash provided by operating activities increased for the six months ended January 31, 20182023 as compared to the same period in 20172022 due to improved cash operating results from an increase in service revenues and changes in operating assets and liabilities.higher costs associated with Hurricane Ian. The change in operating assets and liabilities was primarily the result of an increase in cash provided by income taxestax receivable of $67.3$44.9 million related to

excess tax benefits from stock option exercises; an increaseand decrease in accounts payablecash used of $8.4 million vehicle pooling and accrued liabilities of $43.5 million; partially$16.8 million in inventory. This is offset by a decreaseincrease in accounts receivable of $11.4 million and a decrease in inventory and vehicle pooling costs$33.8 million.
27

Table of $4.1 million.Contents
Net cash used in investing activities increaseddecreased for the six months ended January 31, 20182023 as compared to the same period in 20172022 due primarily to increased capital expenditures, partially offset by an increase in proceeds from the sale of property and equipment.expenditures. Our capital expenditures are primarily related to lease buyouts of certain facilities, acquiring land, opening and improving facilities, capitalized software development costs for new software for internal use and major software enhancements, and acquiring yard equipment. We continue to develop, expand and invest in new and existing facilities and standardize the appearance of existing locations.facilities.
Net cash used inprovided by financing activities increaseddecreased for the six months ended January 31, 20182023 as compared to the same period in 20172022 due primarily to repayments on our Revolving Loan Facility and a decrease in proceeds from the exercise of stock options, partially offset by a decrease in payments for employee stock-based tax withholdings. See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 2 – Long-Term Debt and Note 7 – Stock Repurchases and under the subheadings “Credit Agreement”, “Note Purchase Agreement”, and Stock Repurchases.options.
Credit Agreement
On December 3, 2014,July 21, 2020, we entered into a First Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Truist Bank (as successor by merger to Suntrust Bank), BMO Harris Bank N.A., Santander Bank, N.A., and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent (as amended from time to time, the “Credit Amendment”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, and Bank of America, N.A., as syndication agent. The Credit Agreement provided for (a) a secured revolving loan facility in an aggregate principal amount of up to $300.0 million (the “Revolving Loan Facility”Agreement”), and (b) a secured term loan facility in an aggregate principal amount of $300.0 million (the “Term Loan”), which was fully drawn at closing. The Term Loan amortized $18.8 million per quarter.
On March 15, 2016, we entered into a First Amendment to Credit Agreement (the “Amendment to Credit Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent and Bank of America, N.A. The Amendment to Credit Agreement amended certain terms of the Credit Agreement, dated as of December 3, 2014. The Amendment to Credit Agreement provided for (a) an increase in the secured revolving credit commitments by $50.0 million, bringing the aggregate principal amount of the revolving credit commitments under the Credit Agreement ( the “Revolving Loan Facility”) to $350.0 million, (b) a new secured term loan (the “Incremental Term Loan”) in the aggregate principal amount of $93.8 million having a maturity date of March 15, 2021, and (c) an extension of the termination date of the Revolving Loan Facility and the maturity date of the Term Loan from December 3, 2019 to March 15, 2021. The Amendment to Credit Agreement extended the amortization period for the Term Loan, and decreased the quarterly amortization payments for that loan to $7.5 million per quarter. The Amendment to Credit Agreement additionally reduced the pricing levels under the Credit Agreement to a range of 0.15% to 0.30% in the case of the commitment fee, 1.125% to 2.0% in the case of the applicable margin for LIBOR loans, and 0.125% to 1.0% in the case of the applicable margin for base rate loans, based on our consolidated total net leverage ratio during the preceding fiscal quarter. We borrowed the entire $93.8 million principal amount of the Incremental Term Loan concurrent with the closing of the Amendment to Credit Agreement.$1,050.0 million.
On JulyDecember 21, 2016,2021, we entered into a Second Amendment toAmended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Copart, certain subsidiaries of Copart party thereto, the lenders party thereto, and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent (the “Second Amendment toAmended and Restated Credit Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, SunTrust Bank,. The Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement amends and restates certain terms of the First Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of July 21, 2020, by and among Copart, the lenders party thereto, and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent (as successor in interest to Wells Fargo Bank)Bank, National Association) (the “Existing Credit Agreement”). The Second Amendment to Credit Agreement amends certain terms of the Credit Agreement, dated as of December 3, 2014 as amended by the Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of March 15, 2016. The Second Amendment toAmended and Restated Credit Agreement provides for, among other things, (a) an increase in the secured revolving credit commitments by $500.0$200.0 million, bringing the aggregate principal amount of the revolving credit commitments under the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Revolving Loan Facility”) to $850.0$1,250.0 million, (b) an increase in the repaymentletter of existing term loans outstandingcredit sublimit from $60.0 million to $100.0 million, (c) addition of Copart UK Limited, CPRT GmbH and Copart Autos España, S.L.U., each a wholly-owned direct or indirect foreign subsidiary of Copart, as borrowers, (d) addition of the ability to borrow under the Second and Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (c) anin certain foreign currencies including Pounds Sterling, Euro and Canadian Dollars, (e) extension of the terminationmaturity date of the revolving credit facility under the Existing Credit Agreement from March 15, 2021 to July 21, 2021,2023 to December 21, 2026, (f) replacing the LIBOR interest rate applicable to U.S. Dollar denominated borrowings with a Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) interest rate, and (d) increased covenant flexibility.
Concurrent with the closing of the Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, we prepaid in full the outstanding $242.5 million principal amount of the Term Loan and Incremental Term Loan under the Credit Agreement without premium or penalty. The Second Amendment to Credit Agreement reduced(g) changing the pricing levels under the Credit Agreement to a range of 0.125% to 0.20% in the case of the commitment fee, 1.00% to 1.75% in the case of the applicable margin for LIBOR loans, and 0.0% to 0.75% in the case of the applicable margin for base rate loans, in each case depending on our consolidated total net leverage ratio. The principal purposes of these financing transactions were to increase the size and availability under our Revolving Loan Facility and to provide additional long-term financing. The proceeds are being used for general corporate purposes, including working capital and capital expenditures, potential share repurchases, acquisitions, or other investments relating to our expansion strategies in domestic and international markets.

The Revolving Loan Facility under the Credit Agreement bears interest, at our election, at either (a) the Base Rate, which is defined as a fluctuating rate per annum equalwith respect to the greatest of (i) the Prime Rate in effect on such day; (ii) the Federal Funds Rate in effect on such date plus 0.50%; or (iii) an adjusted LIBOR rate determined on the basis of a one-month interest period plus 1.0%, in each case plus an applicable margin ranging from 0.0% to 0.75% based on our consolidated total net leverage ratio during the preceding fiscal quarter; or (b) an adjusted LIBOR rate plus an applicable margin ranging from 1.00% to 1.75% depending on our consolidated total net leverage ratio during the preceding fiscal quarter. Interest is due and payable quarterly, in arrears, forrevolving loans bearing interest at the Base Rate, and at the end of an interest period (or at each three month interval in the case of loans with interest periods greater than three months) in the case of loans bearing interest at the adjusted LIBOR rate. The interest rate as of January 31, 2018 on our Revolving Loan Facility was the one month LIBOR rate of 1.56% plus an applicable margin of 1.00%. The carrying amount of the Credit Agreement is comprised of borrowings under which interest accrues under a fluctuating interest rate structure. Accordingly, the carrying value approximates fair value at January 31, 2018, and was classified within Level II of the fair value hierarchy.further described below.
Amounts borrowed under the Revolving Loan Facilitymay be repaid and reborrowed until the maturity date of July 21, 2021. We are obligated to pay a commitment fee on the unused portion of the Revolving Loan Facility. The commitment fee rate ranges from 0.125% to 0.20%, depending on our consolidated total net leverage ratio during the preceding fiscal quarter, on the average daily unused portion of the revolving credit commitment under the Credit Agreement. We had $110.7 million and $231.0 million ofno outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Loan Facility as of January 31, 20182023 and July 31, 2017, respectively.
Our obligations under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed by certain of our domestic subsidiaries meeting materiality thresholds set forth in the Credit Agreement. Such obligations, including the guaranties, are secured by substantially all of our assets and the assets of the subsidiary guarantors pursuant to a Security Agreement, dated December 3, 2014, among us, the subsidiary guarantors from time to time party thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as collateral agent.
2022. The Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants including covenants that limit or restrict us and our subsidiaries’ ability to, among other things, incur indebtedness, grant liens, merge or consolidate, dispose of assets, make investments, make acquisitions, enter into transactions with affiliates, pay dividends, or make distributions on and repurchase stock, in each case subject to certain exceptions. We are also required to maintain compliance, measured at the end of each fiscal quarter, with a consolidated total net leverage ratio and a consolidated interest coverage ratio. The Credit Agreement contains no restrictions on the payment of dividends and other restricted payments, as defined, as long as (1) the consolidated total net leverage ratio, as defined, both before and after giving effect to any such dividend or restricted payment on a pro forma basis, is less than 3.25:1, in an unlimited amount, (2) if clause (1) is not available, so long as the consolidated total net leverage ratio both before and after giving effect to any such dividend on a pro forma basis is less than 3.50:1, in an aggregate amount not to exceed the available amount, as defined, and (3) if clauses (1) and (2) are not available, in an aggregate amount not to exceed $50.0 million; provided, that, minimum liquidity, as defined, shall be not less than $75.0 million both before and after giving effect to any such dividend or restricted payment. As of January 31, 2018, the consolidated total net leverage ratio was 0.56:1. Minimum liquidity as of January 31, 2018 was $906.6 million. Accordingly, we do not believe that the provisions of the Credit Agreement represent a significant restriction to our ability to pay dividends or to the successful future operations of the business. We have not paid a cash dividend since becoming a public company in 1994. We were in compliance with all covenants related to the Credit Agreement as of January 31, 2018.2023.
Note Purchase Agreement
On December 3, 2014, we entered into a Note Purchase Agreement and sold to certain purchasers (collectively, the “Purchasers”) $400.0 million in aggregate principal amount of senior secured notes (the “Senior Notes”) consisting of (i) $100.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.07% Senior Notes, Series A, due December 3, 2024; (ii) $100.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.19% Senior Notes, Series B, due December 3, 2026; (iii) $100.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.25% Senior Notes, Series C, due December 3, 2027; and (iv) $100.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.35% Senior Notes, Series D, due December 3, 2029. Interest is due and payable quarterly, in arrears, on each of the Senior Notes. Proceeds from the Note Purchase Agreement are being used for general corporate purposes.
On July 21, 2016, we entered into Amendment No. 1 to Note Purchase Agreement (the “First Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement”) which amended certain terms of the Note Purchase Agreement, including providing for increased flexibility substantially consistent with the changes included in the Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, including among other things increased covenant flexibility.
We may prepay the Senior Notes, in whole or in part, at any time, subject to certain conditions, including minimum amounts and payment of a make-whole amount equal to the discounted value of the remaining scheduled interest payments under the Senior Notes.
Our obligations under the Note Purchase Agreement are guaranteed by certain of our domestic subsidiaries meeting materiality thresholds set forth in the Note Purchase Agreement. Such obligations, including the guaranties, are secured by substantially all of our assets and the assets of the subsidiary guarantors. Our obligations and our subsidiary guarantors under the Note Purchase Agreement will be treated on a pari passu basis with the obligations of those entities under the Credit Agreement as well as any additional debt that we may obtain.

The Note Purchase Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, including covenants that limit or restrict us and our subsidiaries’ ability to, among other things, incur indebtedness, grant liens, merge or consolidate, dispose of assets, make investments, make acquisitions, enter into transactions with affiliates, pay dividends, or make distributions and repurchase stock, in each case subject to certain exceptions. We are also required to maintain compliance, measured at the end of each fiscal quarter, with a consolidated total net leverage ratio and a consolidated interest coverage ratio. The Note Purchase Agreement contains no restrictions on the payment of dividends and other restricted payments, as defined, as long as (1) the consolidated total net leverage ratio, as defined, both before and after giving effect to any such dividend or restricted payment on a pro forma basis, is less than 3.25:1, in an unlimited amount, (2) if clause (1) is not available, so long as the consolidated total net leverage ratio both before and after giving effect to any such dividend on a pro forma basis is less than 3.50:1, in an aggregate amount not to exceed the available amount, as defined, and (3) if clauses (1) and (2) are not available, in an aggregate amount not to exceed $50.0 million; provided, that, minimum liquidity, as defined, shall be not less than $75.0 million both before and after giving effect to any such dividend or restricted payment. As of January 31, 2018, the consolidated total net leverage ratio was 0.56:1. Minimum liquidity as of January 31, 2018 was $906.6 million. Accordingly, we do not believe that the provisions of the Note Purchase Agreement represent a significant restriction to our ability to pay dividends or to the successful future operations of the business. We have not paid a cash dividend since becoming a public company in 1994. We are in compliance with all covenants related to the Note Purchase Agreement as of January 31, 2018.
Related to the execution of the Credit Agreement, First Amendment to Credit Agreement, Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, and the Note Purchase Agreement, we incurred $3.4 million in costs, of which $2.0 million was capitalized as debt issuance fees and $1.4 million was recorded as a reduction of the long-term debt proceeds as a debt discount. Both the debt issuance fees and debt discount are amortized to interest expense over the term of the respective debt instruments and are classified as reductions of the outstanding liability.
Stock Repurchases
On September 22, 2011, our Board of Directors approved an 80a 160 million share increase in the stock repurchase program, bringing the total current authorization to 196392 million shares. The repurchases may be effected through solicited or unsolicited transactions in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. No time limit has been placed on the duration of the stock repurchase program. Subject to applicable securities laws, such repurchases will be made at such times and in such amounts as we deem appropriate and may be discontinued at any time. We did not repurchase any shares of our common stock under the program during the six months ended January 31, 20182023 or 2017.2022. As of January 31, 2018,2023, the total number of shares repurchased under the program was 106,913,602,229,098,396, and 89,086,398162,901,604 shares were available for repurchase under the program.
In fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2018, certain executive officers, members of the Company’s Board of Directors and other employees exercised stock options through cashless exercises. A portion of the options exercised were net settled in satisfaction of the exercise price and federal and state statutory tax withholding requirements. We remitted $134.6 million for the six months ended January 31, 2017 to the proper taxing authorities in satisfaction of the employees’ statutory withholding requirements.
The exercised stock options, utilizing a cashless exercise, are summarized in the following table:
Period Options Exercised Weighted Average Exercise Price Shares Net Settled for Exercise 
Shares Withheld for Taxes(1)
 Net Shares to Employees Weighted Average Share Price for Withholding Employee Stock Based Tax Withholding (in 000s)
FY 2017—Q1 18,000,000
 $7.70
 5,408,972
 5,255,322
 7,335,706
 $25.62
 $134,615
FY 2018—Q2 80,000
 6.54
 11,996
 
 68,004
 43.60
 
(1)Shares withheld for taxes are treated as a repurchase of shares for accounting purposes but do not count against our stock repurchase program.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including costs related to vehicle pooling self-insured reserves, allowance for doubtful accounts,costs; income taxes, revenue recognition,taxes; stock-based payment compensation, purchase price allocations, long-lived asset impairment calculationscompensation; and contingencies. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Management has discussed the selection of critical accounting policies and estimates with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee has reviewed our disclosure relating to critical accounting policies and estimates in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. There have been no significantmaterial changes to the critical accounting policies and estimates from what was disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 20172022 filed with the SEC on September 27, 2017.2022. Our significant accounting policies are described in the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
28

Table of Contents

Recently Issued Accounting Standards
For a description of the new accounting standards that affect us, refer to the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 912 – Recent Accounting Pronouncements.in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
There have been no material changes during the six months ended January 31, 20182023 to our contractual obligations disclosed in our “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 20172022, filed with the SEC on September 27, 2017.2022.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of January 31, 2018, there are2023, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements other than a letter of credit and our funding commitments pursuant to Item 303(a)(4)surety bonds, none of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Exchange Actwhich have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of 1934, as amended.operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
There have been no material changes to the information required under this Item from what was disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 20172022, filed with the SEC on September 27, 2017.2022.
29

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act), or Disclosure Controls, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. This evaluation, or Controls Evaluation, was performed under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our ChiefCo-Chief Executive Officer (CEO)(“Co-CEO”) and our Chief Financial Officer (CFO)(“CFO”). Disclosure Controls are controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act, such as this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure Controls include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEOCo-CEO and CFO, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our Disclosure Controls include some, but not all, components of our internal control over financial reporting.
Based upon the Controls Evaluation, our CEOCo-CEO and CFO have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our Disclosure Controls were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is accumulated and communicated to management, including the CEOCo-CEO and CFO, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, and that such information is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
(b) Changes in Internal Controls
There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
30

Table of Contents

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are subject to threatsFor a discussion of litigation and are involved in actual litigation and damage claims arising in the ordinary course of business, such as actions related to injuries, property damage, contract disputes, and handling or disposal of vehicles. The material pending legal proceedings to which we are party, or of which our property is subject, include the following matters. 
On November 1, 2013, we filed suit against Sparta Consulting, Inc. (now known as KPIT) in the 44th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas, alleging fraud, fraudulent inducement, and/or promissory fraud, negligent misrepresentation, unfair business practices pursuant to California Business and Professions Code § 17200, breach of contract, declaratory judgment, and attorney’s fees. We seek compensatory and exemplary damages, disgorgement of amounts paid, attorney’s fees, pre- and post-judgment interest, costs of suit, and a judicial declaration of the parties’ rights, duties, and obligations under the Implementation Services Agreement dated October 6, 2011. The suit arises out of our September 17, 2013 decision to terminate the Implementation Services Agreement, under which KPIT was to design, implement, and deliver a customized replacement enterprise resource planning system for us. On January 2, 2014, KPIT removed this suitLegal Proceedings that affect us, refer to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. On August 11, 2014, the Northern District of Texas transferred the suitNotes to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California for convenience. On January 8, 2014, KPIT filed suit against usUnaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 13 – Legal Proceedings included in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, alleging breach of contract, promissory estoppel, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, account stated, quantum meruit, unjust enrichment, and declaratory relief. KPIT seeks compensatory and exemplary damages, prejudgment interest, costs of suit, and a judicial declaration of the parties’ rights, duties, and obligations under the Implementation Services Agreement. On June 8, 2016, we amended our complaint to include claims that KPIT stole certain intellectual property owned by us and acted negligently in its provision of services. We are pursuing our claim for damages, and defending against KPIT’s claim for damages. We and KPIT filed competing motions for summary judgment in January 2017. The Court issued its ruling on the motions on September 25, 2017. Our claims remaining in the case after the ruling include fraud, fraudulent inducement, breach of contract, professional negligence, trade secret misappropriation, unfair competition, unjust enrichment, and computer hacking. KPIT’s claims are now limited to breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and declaratory relief. The case has been set for a jury trial in the Sacramento, California federal court in April 2018.
We have provided for costs relating to these matters when a loss is probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. The effect of the outcome of these matters on our future consolidated results of operations and cash flows cannot be predicted because any such effect depends on future results of operations and the amount and timing of the resolution of such matters. We believe that any ultimate liability will not have a material effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows. However, the amount of the liabilities associated with these claims, if any, cannot be determined with certainty. We maintain insurance which may or may not provide coverage for claims made against us. There is no assurance that there will be insurance coverage available when and if needed. Additionally, the insurance that we carry requires that we pay for costs and/or claims exposure up to the amount of the insurance deductibles negotiated when the insurance is purchased.
Governmental Proceedings
On August 4, 2015, the DOR issued an official Assessment and Demand for Payment (the “Assessment”) for $96.1 million for sales taxes, penalties, and interest that the DOR alleged we owe to the State of Georgia. We filed an appeal of this Assessment from the DOR with the Georgia Tax TribunalQuarterly Report on September 3, 2015. On August 5, 2016, the DOR filed a response in which it denied all allegations noted in our appeal of the Assessment.Form 10-Q.
During an extended remand period, it was determined that grounds exist for a substantial reduction in the Official Assessment, on the basis that (i) the transactions and resulting tax at issue were erroneously double-counted by the DOR in the audit sales transaction work papers on which the Assessment was based; and (ii) we were ultimately able to provide documentation showing that most of the remaining transactions were sales at wholesale, therefore qualifying for the sale for resale exemption from Georgia Sales and Use Tax. After these reductions, the remaining amount of principal Georgia Sales and Use Tax still in dispute between the parties is $2.6 million, plus applicable interest. A Consent Order to this effect was entered by the Georgia Tax Tribunal on May 22, 2017. Since the date of entry of the Consent Order, we and the DOR have engaged in discovery, which is expected to be completed in fiscal 2018.

Based on the opinion from our outside law firm, advice from our outside tax advisors, and our best estimate of a probable outcome, we believe that we have adequately provided for the payment of any assessment in our consolidated financial statements. We believe we have strong defenses to the remaining tax liability set forth above and intend to continue to defend this matter. There can be no assurance that this matter will be resolved in our favor or that we will not ultimately be required to make a substantial payment to the DOR. We understand that litigating and defending the matter in Georgia could be expensive and time-consuming and result in substantial management distraction. If the matter were to be resolved in a manner adverse to us, it could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations and financial position.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Set forth below and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in other documents we file with the SEC are descriptions of the risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this report.Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The descriptions below include any material changes to and supersede the description of the risk factors affecting our business previously disclosed in “Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2017.2022.
Risks Related to Our Business and Industry
We depend on a limited number of major vehicle sellers for a substantial portion of our revenues. The loss of one or more of these major sellers could adversely affect our consolidated results of operations and financial position, and an inability to increase our sources of vehicle supply could adversely affect our growth rates.
NoAlthough no single customer accounted for more than 10% of our consolidated revenuerevenues during the six months ended January 31, 2018. Historically,2023, a limited number of vehicle sellers historically have collectively accounted for a substantial portion of our revenues. Seller arrangements are either written or oral agreements typically subject to cancellation by either party upon 30 to 90 days’ notice. Vehicle sellers have terminated agreements with us in the past in particular markets, which has affected revenues in those markets. There can be no assurance that our existing agreements will not be canceled. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that we will be able to enter into future agreements with vehicle sellers or that we will be able to retain our existing supply of salvage vehicles. A reduction in vehicles from a significant vehicle seller or any material changes in the terms of an arrangement with a significant vehicle seller could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations and financial position. In addition, a failure to increase our sources of vehicle supply could adversely affect our earnings and revenue growth rates.
Our expansion into markets outside the U.S., including expansions in Europe, Brazil, and the Middle East expose us to risks arising from operating in international markets. Any failure to successfully integrate businesses acquired or operational capabilities established outside the U.S. into our operations could have an adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.
We first expanded our operations outside the U.S. in fiscal 2003 with an acquisition in Canada. Subsequently, in fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2008 we made a significant acquisitionacquisitions in the U.K., followed by acquisitions in the U.A.E., Brazil, Germany, and Spain in fiscal 2013, expansions into Bahrain and Oman in fiscal 2015, and expansion into the Republic of Ireland and India in fiscal 2016.2016, and an acquisition in Finland in fiscal 2018, and a parts recycler in U.K. in fiscal 2022. In addition, we continue to evaluate acquisitions and other opportunities outside of the U.S. Acquisitions or other strategies to expand our operations outside of the U.S. pose substantial risks and uncertainties that could have an adverse effect on our future operating results. In particular, we may not be successful in realizing anticipated synergies from these acquisitions, or we may experience unanticipated costs or expenses integrating the acquired operations into our existing business. We have and may continue to incur substantial expenses establishing new yards and operations, acquiring buyers and sellers, and implementing shared services capabilities in international markets. Among other things, we plan to ultimately deploy our proprietary auction technologies at all of our foreign operations and we cannot predict whether this deployment will be successful or will result in increases in the revenues or operating efficiencies of any acquired companies relative to their historic operating performance. Integration of our respective operations, including information technology and financial and administrative functions, may not proceed as anticipated and could result in unanticipated costs or expenses such as capital expenditures that could have an adverse effect on our future operating results. We cannot provide any assurance that we will achieve our business and financial objectives in connection with these acquisitions or our strategic decision to expand our operations internationally. For example, although we recentlycontinue to operate a technology and operations center in India for administrative support, we decided to suspend our salvage operations in India in fiscal 2018, until the Indian market develops in a manner better suited to our business model.model, which did not have a material effect on our consolidated results of operations and financial position.
As we continue to expand our business internationally, we will need to develop policies and procedures to manage our business on a global scale. Operationally, acquired businesses typically depend on key seller relationships, and our failure to maintain those relationships would have an adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations and could have an adverse effect on our future operating results. Moreover, success in opening and operating facilities in new markets can be dependent upon establishing new relationships with buyers and sellers, and our failure to establish those relationships could have an adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations and future operating results.
31

In addition, we anticipate our international operations will continue to subject us to a variety of risks associated with operating on an international basis, including:
•    the difficulty of managing and staffing foreign offices;
the increased travel, infrastructure, and legal compliance costs associated with multiple international locations;
•    the need to localize our mix of product and service offerings in response to customer requirements, particularly the need to implement our online auction platform in foreign countries;

•    the need to comply with complex foreign and U.S. laws and regulations that apply to our international operations;
•    tariffs, and trade barriers, trade disputes, and other regulatory or contractual limitations on our ability to operate in certain foreign markets;
•    exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk, which may have an adverse impact on our revenues and revenue growth rates;
•    adapting to different business cultures, languages, and market structures, particularly where we seek to implement our auction model in markets where insurers have historically not played a substantial role in the disposition of salvage vehicles; and
•    repatriation of funds currently held in foreign jurisdictions to the U.S., which may result in higher effective tax rates.rates;
•    military conflicts, including the Russian invasion of Ukraine;
•    public health issues, including but not limited to the COVID-19 pandemic;
•    environmental issues;
•    natural and man-made disasters; and
•    political issues.
As we continue to expand our business globally, our success will depend, in large part, on our ability to anticipate and effectively manage these and other risks associated with our international operations. Our failure to manage any of these risks successfully could harm our international operations and have an adverse effect on our operating results.
On June 23, 2016, the U.K. held a referendum in which voters approved an exit from the European Union, commonly referred to as “Brexit.” In February 2017, the British Parliament voted in favor of allowing the British government to begin negotiating the terms of the U.K.’s withdrawal from the European Union and discussions with the European Union began in March 2017. The ultimate effects of Brexit on us are difficult to predict, but adverse consequences concerning Brexit or the European Union could include deterioration in global economic conditions, instability in global financial markets, political uncertainty, volatility in currency exchange rates, or adverse changes in the cross-border agreements currently in place, any of which could have an adverse impact on our financial results in the future. The ultimate effects of Brexit on us will also depend on the terms of agreements, if any, that the U.K. and the European Union make to retain access to each other’s respective markets either during a transitional period or more permanently.
In addition, certain acquisitions in the U.K. may be reviewed by the Competition and Markets Authority (U.K. Regulator). If an inquiry is made by the U.K. Regulator, we may be required to demonstrate that our acquisitions will not result, or be expected to result, in a substantial lessening of competition in the U.K. market. Although we believe that there will not be a substantial lessening of competition in the U.K. market, based on our analysis of the relevant U.K. markets, there can be no assurance that the U.K. Regulator will agree with us if it decides to make an inquiry. If the U.K. Regulator determines that by our acquisitions of certain assets, there is or likely will be a substantial lessening of competition in the U.K. market, we could be required to divest some portion of our U.K. assets. In the event of a divestiture order by the U.K. Regulator, the assets disposed may be sold for substantially less than their carrying value. Accordingly, any divestiture could have a material adverse effect on our operating results in the period of the divestiture.
Our operations and acquisitions in certain foreign areas expose us to political, regulatory, economic, and reputational risks.
Although we have implemented policies, procedures and training designed to ensure compliance with anti-bribery laws, trade controls and economic sanctions, and similar regulations, our employees or agents may take actions in violation of our policies. We may incur costs or other penalties in the event that any such violations occur, which could have an adverse effect on our business and reputation.
In some cases, the enforcement practices of governmental regulators in certain foreign areas and the procedural and substantive rights and remedies available to us may vary significantly from those in the United States, which could have an adverse effect on our business.
In addition, some of our recent acquisitions have required us to integrate non-U.S. companies which had not, until our acquisition, been subject to U.S. law. In many countries outside of the United States, particularly in those with developing economies, it may be common for persons to engage in business practices prohibited by laws and regulations applicable to us, such as the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), U.K. Bribery Act, Brazil Clean Companies Act, India’s Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 or similar local anti-bribery laws. These laws generally prohibit companies and their employees or agents from making improper payments for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Failure by us and our subsidiaries to comply with these laws could subject us to civil and criminal penalties that could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated operating results and financial position.
We face risks associated with the implementation of our salvage auction model in markets that may not operate on the same terms as the U.S. market. For example, certain markets operate on a principal rather than agent basis, which may have an adverse impact on our gross margin percentages and expose us to inventory risks that we do not experience in the U.S.
Some of our target markets outside the U.S. operate in a manner substantially different than our historic market in the U.S. For example, new markets may operate either wholly or partially on the principal model, in which the vehicle is purchased then resold for our own account, rather than the agency model employed in the U.S., in which we generally act as a sales agent for the legal owner of vehicles. Further, operating on a principal basis exposes us to inventory risks, including losses from theft, damage, and obsolescence. In addition, our business in the U.S., Canada, and the U.K. has been established and grown based largely on our ability to build relationships with insurance carriers. In other markets, insurers have traditionally been less involved in the disposition of salvage vehicles. As we expand into markets outside the U.S., Canada, and the U.K., we cannot predict whether markets will readily adapt to our strategy of online auctions of automobiles sourced principally through vehicle insurers. Any failure of new markets to adopt our business model could adversely affect our consolidated results of operations and financial position.

Acquisitions typically will increase our sales and profitability although, given the typical size of our acquisitions to date, most acquisitions will not individually have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations and financial position. We may not always be able to introduce our processes and selling platform to acquired companies due to different operating models in international jurisdictions or other facts. As a result, the associated benefits of acquisitions may be delayed for years in some international situations. During this period, the acquisitions may operate at a loss and certain acquisitions, while profitable, may operate at a margin percentage that is below our overall operating margin percentage and, accordingly, have an adverse impact on our consolidated results of operations and financial position. Hence, the conversion periods vary from weeks to years and cannot be predicted.
We have transitioned various functionality of our previously planned third-party enterprise operating system to an internally developed proprietary system, and we may experience difficulties operating our business as we work to develop and design this system.
During fiscal 2014, we terminated a contract with KPIT (formerly known as Sparta Consulting, Inc.), whereby KPIT was engaged to design and implement an SAP-based replacement for our existing business operating software that, among other things, would address our international expansion needs. Following a review of KPIT’s work performed to date, and an assessment of the cost to complete, deployment risk, and other factors, we ceased development of KPIT’s software and internally developed a proprietary solution in its place. The ongoing design, development, and implementation of our enterprise operating systems carry certain risks, including the risk of significant design or deployment errors causing disruptions, delays or deficiencies, which may make our website and services unavailable. This type of interruption could prevent us from processing vehicles for our sellers and may prevent us from selling vehicles through our Internet bidding platform, VB3, which would adversely affect our consolidated results of operations and financial position. In addition, the transition to our new internally developed proprietary system will require us to commit substantial financial, operational and technical resources before the volume of business increases, without assurance that the volume of business will increase. We began using our new internally developed proprietary system with our expansion into Spain in fiscal 2016 and Germany in fiscal 2017.
We may also implement additional or enhanced information systems in the future to accommodate our growth and to provide additional capabilities and functionality. The implementation of new systems and enhancements is frequently disruptive to the underlying business of an enterprise and can be time-consuming and expensive, increase management responsibilities and divert management attention. Any disruptions relating to our system enhancements or any problems with the implementation, particularly any disruptions impacting our operations or our ability to accurately report our financial performance on a timely basis during the implementation period, could materially and adversely affect our business. Even if we do not encounter these material and adverse effects, the implementation of these enhancements may be much more costly than we anticipated. If we are unable to successfully implement the information systems enhancements as planned, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows could be negatively impacted.
Our success depends on maintaining the integrity of our systems and infrastructure. As our operations continue to grow in both size and scope, domestically and internationally, we must continue to provide reliable, real-time access to our systems by our customers through improving and upgrading our systems and infrastructure for enhanced products, services, features and functionality. Any failure to maintain the integrity of our systems and infrastructure may result in loss of customers due to among other things, slow delivery times, unreliable service levels or insufficient capacity, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated financial position and results of operations.
The impairment of capitalized development costs could adversely affect our consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
We capitalize certain costs associated with the development of new software products, new software for internal use and major software enhancements to existing software. These costs are amortized over the estimated useful life of the software beginning with its introduction or roll-out. If, at any time, it is determined that capitalized software provides a reduced economic benefit, the unamortized portion of the capitalized development costs will be expensed, in part or in full, as an impairment, which may have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations and financial position. For example, during fiscal 2017, we recognized a $19.4 million charge primarily related to fully impairing costs previously capitalized in connection with the development of business operating software.
Any failure to maintain security and prevent unauthorized access to electronic and other confidential information could disrupt our business and materially and adversely affect our reputation, consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
Information security risks for online commerce companies have significantly increased in recent years because of, in addition to other factors, the proliferation of new technologies, the use of the Internet and telecommunications technologies to conduct financial transactions, and the increased sophistication and activities of organized crime, hackers, terrorists, and other external parties. These threats may derive from fraud or malice on the part of third parties or current or former employees. In addition, human error or accidental technological failure could make us vulnerable to cyber-attacks, including the introduction of malicious computer viruses or code into our system, phishing attacks, or other information technology data security incidents.

Our operations rely on the secure processing, transmission and storage of confidential, proprietary and other information in our computer systems and networks. Our customers and other parties in the payments value chain rely on our digital technologies, computer and e-mail systems, software and networks to conduct their operations. In addition, to access our products and services, our customers and cardholders increasingly use personal smartphones, tablet PCs and other mobile devices that may be beyond our control.
Cyber-attacks or other cyber security incidents could materially and adversely affect our reputation, operating results, or financial condition by, among other things, making our auction platform inoperable for a period of time, damaging our reputation with buyers, sellers, and insurance companies as a result of the unauthorized disclosure of confidential information (including account data information), or resulting in governmental investigations, litigation, liability, fines, or penalties against us. If such attacks are not detected immediately, their effect could be compounded. While we maintain insurance coverage that may, subject to policy terms and conditions, cover certain aspects of these cyber risks, our insurance coverage may be insufficient to cover all losses and would not remedy damage to our reputation.
We have in the past identified attempts by unauthorized third parties to access our systems and disrupt our online auctions. These attempts have caused minor service interruptions, which were promptly addressed and resolved, and our online service was restored to normal business. For example, in April 2015, we identified that unauthorized third parties had gained access to data provided to us by our members that is considered to be personal information in certain jurisdictions. We immediately investigated, including the engagement of an external expert security firm, and made the required notifications to members whose information may have been accessed and to regulatory agencies.
We are constantly evaluating and implementing new technologies and processes to manage risks relating to cyber-attacks and system and network disruptions, including but not limited to usage errors by our employees, power outages and catastrophic events such as fires, tornadoes, floods, hurricanes and earthquakes. We have further enhanced our security protocols based on the investigation we conducted in response to the security incident. Nevertheless, we cannot provide assurances that our efforts to address prior data security incidents and mitigate against the risk of future data security incidents or system failures will be successful. The techniques used by criminals to obtain unauthorized access to sensitive data change frequently and are often not recognized immediately. We may be unable to anticipate these techniques or implement adequate preventative measures and believe that cyber-attacks and threats against us have occurred in the past and are likely to continue in the future. If our systems are compromised again in the future, become inoperable for extended periods of time, or cease to function properly, we may have to make a significant investment to fix or replace them, and our ability to provide many of our electronic and online solutions to our customers may be impaired. In addition, as cyber-threats continue to evolve, we may be required to expend significant additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures or to investigate and remediate any information security vulnerabilities. Any of the risks described above could materially and adversely affect our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Our business is exposed to risks associated with online commerce security and credit card fraud.
Consumer concerns over the security of transactions conducted on the Internetinternet or the privacy of users may inhibit the growth of the Internetinternet and online commerce. To securely transmit confidential information such as customer credit card numbers, we rely on encryption and authentication technology. Unanticipated events or developments could result in a compromise or breach of the systems we use to protect customer transaction data. Furthermore, our servers may also be vulnerable to viruses transmitted via the Internetinternet and other points of access. While we proactively check for intrusions into our infrastructure, a new or undetected virus could cause a service disruption.
We maintain an information security program and our processing systems incorporate multiple levels of protection in order to address or otherwise mitigate these risks. Despite these mitigation efforts, there can be no assurance that we will be immune to these risks and not suffer losses in the future. Under current credit card practices, we may be held liable for fraudulent credit card transactions and other payment disputes with customers. As such, we have implemented certain anti-fraud measures, including credit card verification procedures. However, a failure to adequately prevent fraudulent credit card transactions could adversely affect our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Our security measures may also be breached due to employee error, malfeasance, insufficiency, or defective design. Additionally, outside parties may attempt to fraudulently induce employees, users, or customers to disclose sensitive information in order to gain access to our data or our users’ or customers’ data. Any such breach or unauthorized access could result in significant legal and financial exposure, damage to our reputation, and a loss of confidence in the security of our products and services that could have an adverse effect on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.

32

Our business is subject to a variety
Table of domestic and international laws and other obligations regarding privacy and data protection.Contents
We are subject to federal, state and international laws, directives, and regulations relating to the collection, use, retention, disclosure, security and transfer of personal data. These laws, directives, and regulations, and their interpretation and enforcement continue to evolve and may be inconsistent from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Complying with emerging and changing privacy and data protection requirements may cause us to incur substantial costs or require us to change our business practices. For example, in October 2015, a European court decision invalidated the U.S.-EU Safe Harbor framework which allowed us and other companies to meet certain European legal requirements for the transfer of personal data from the European Economic Area to the U.S. We may find it necessary or desirable to modify our data handling practices as a result of this court decision, and it may serve as a basis for our personal data handling practices to be challenged or otherwise adversely impact our business. Noncompliance with our legal obligations relating to privacy and data protection could result in penalties, legal proceedings by governmental entities or others, and significant legal and financial exposure and could affect our ability to retain and attract customers. Any of the risks described above could adversely affect our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Implementation of our online auction model in new markets may not result in the same synergies and benefits that we achieved when we implemented the model in the U.S., Canada, and the U.K.
We believe that the implementation of our proprietary auction technologies across our operations over the last decade had a favorable impact on our results of operations by increasing the size and geographic scope of our buyer base, increasing the average selling price for vehicles sold through our sales, and lowering expenses associated with vehicle sales.
WeFor example, we implemented our online system across all of our U.S., Canada, and U.K. salvage yards beginningbetween in fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2008 respectively, and experienced increases in revenues and average selling prices, as well as improved operating efficiencies in those markets. In considering new markets, we consider the potential synergies from the implementation of our model based in large part on our experience in the U.S., Canada, and the U.K. However, we cannot predict whether these synergies will also be realized in new markets.
Failure to havemaintain sufficient capacity to accept additional carsvehicles at one or more of our storage facilities could adversely affect our relationships with insurance companies or other sellers of vehicles.
Capacity at our storage facilities varies from period to period and from region to region. For example, following adverse weather conditions in a particular area, our yards in that area may fill and limit our ability to accept additional salvage vehicles while we process existing inventories. For example, Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, Sandy, and HarveyHurricane Ida had, in certain quarters, an adverse effect on our operating results, in part because of yard capacity constraints in the impacted areas of the United States.U.S. We regularly evaluate our capacity in all our markets and where appropriate, seek to increase capacity through the acquisition of additional land and yards. We may not be able to reach agreements to purchase independent storage facilities in markets where we have limited excess capacity, and zoning restrictions or difficulties obtaining use permits may limit our ability to expand our capacity through acquisitions of new land. Failure to have sufficient capacity at one or more of our yards could adversely affect our relationships with insurance companies or other sellers of vehicles, which could have an adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations and financial position.
Because the growth of our business has been due in large part to acquisitions and development of new facilities, the rate of growth of our business and revenues may decline if we are not able to successfully complete acquisitions and develop new facilities.
We seek to increase our sales and profitability through the acquisition of complementary businesses, additional facilities and the development of new facilities. For example, in fiscal 2016,2020, we opened two new operational facilities in Castledermot, Republic of Ireland; Algete, Spain;Germany, one new operational facility in Brazil, and sixthree new operational facilities in the U.S. In fiscal 2017,2021, we opened aone new operational facility in Bad Fallingbostel, Germany, aone new operational facility in Betim, Minas Gerais, Brazil, nineSpain, ten new operational facilities in the U.S., and acquired Cycle Express, LLC, which conducts business primarily asan operational facility in Des Moines, Iowa. In fiscal 2022, we opened one new operational facility in Canada, one new operational facility in Spain, and five new operational facilities in the U.S. In fiscal 2023, we opened one new operational facility in Germany and four new operational facilities in the U.S. As for strategic acquisitions of complementary businesses, we acquired National Powersport Auctions (NPA),in fiscal 2017, and in fiscal 2022 we acquired Hills Motors (“Hills”) a leading non-salvage auction platform for motorcycles, snowmobiles, watercraft and other powersports vehicles. NPAused, or “green” parts recycler in the U.K. that has four operating facilities. The Hills acquisition is currently operates facilities in Atlanta, Georgia; Cincinnati, Ohio; Dallas, Texas; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and San Diego, California. In fiscal 2018, we opened new facilities in Andrews, Texas and Exeter, Rhode Island.undergoing review by the CMA. Acquisitions are difficult to identify and complete for a number of reasons, including competition among prospective buyers, the availability of affordable financing in the capital markets and the need to satisfy applicable closing conditions and obtain antitrust and other regulatory approvals on acceptable terms. There can be no assurance that we will be able to:
•    continue to acquire additional facilities on favorable terms;
•    expand existing facilities in no-growth regulatory environments;
•    obtain or retain buyers, sellers, and sales volumes in new markets or facilities;
•    increase revenues and profitability at acquired and new facilities;
•    maintain the historical revenue and earnings growth rates we have been able to obtain through facility openings and strategic acquisitions;
•    create new vehicle storage facilities that meet our current revenue and profitability requirements; or
•    obtain necessary regulatory approvals under applicable antitrust and competition laws.

In addition, certain of the acquisition agreements byunder which we have acquired companies require the former owners to indemnify us against certain liabilities related to the operation of the company before we acquired it. In most of these agreements, however, the liability of the former owners is limited and certain former owners may be unable to meet their indemnification responsibilities. We cannot assure that these indemnification provisions will protect us fully or at all, and as a result we may face unexpected liabilities that adversely affect our financial statements. Any failure to continue to successfully identify and complete acquisitions and develop new facilities could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations and financial position.
33

As we continue to expand our operations, our failure to manage growth could harm our business and adversely affect our consolidated results of operations and financial position.
Our ability to manage growth depends not only on our ability to successfully integrate new facilities, but also on our ability to:
•    hire, train and manage additional qualified personnel;
•    establish new relationships or expand existing relationships with vehicle sellers;
•    identify and acquire or lease suitable premises on competitive terms;
•    secure adequate capital;
identify productive uses for available capital reserves; and
•    maintain the supply of vehicles from vehicle sellers.
Our inability to control or manage these growth factors effectively could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations and financial position.
If we experience problems with our subhaulers and trucking fleet operations, our business could be harmed.
We rely primarily upon independent subhaulers to pick up and deliver vehicles to and from our storage facilities in the U.S., Canada, Brazil, the Republic of Ireland, Germany, Finland, the U.A.E., Oman, Bahrain, and Spain. We also utilize, to a lesser extent, independent subhaulers in the U.K. Our annualfailure to pick up and quarterly performancedeliver vehicles in a timely and accurate manner could harm our reputation and brand, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Further, an increase in fuel cost may fluctuate, causinglead to increased prices charged by our independent subhaulers, which may significantly increase our cost. We may not be able to pass these costs on to our sellers or buyers.
In addition to using independent subhaulers, in the U.S., U.K. and Germany we utilize a fleet of company trucks to pick up and deliver vehicles from our storage facilities in those geographies. In connection therewith, we are subject to the risks associated with providing trucking services, including but not limited to inclement weather, disruptions in transportation infrastructure, accidents and related injury claims, availability and price of fuel, any of which could result in an increase in our stockoperating expenses and reduction in our net income.
New member programs could impact our operating results.
We have initiated and intend to decline.continue to initiate programs to open our auctions to the general public. These programs include the Registered Broker program through which the public can purchase vehicles through a registered member, and Copart Lounge programs through which registered members can open Copart storefronts in foreign markets with internet kiosks enabling the general public to search our inventory and purchase vehicles. Initiating programs that allow access to our online auctions to the general public will involve material expenditures and we cannot predict what future benefit, if any, will be derived. These programs could also create additional risks including heightened regulation and litigation risk related to vehicle sales to the general public, and heightened branding, reputational, and intellectual property risk associated with allowing Copart registered members to establish Copart-branded storefronts in foreign jurisdictions.
OurFactors such as mild weather conditions can have an adverse effect on our revenues and operating results, as well as our revenue and earnings growth rates, by reducing the available supply of salvage vehicles. Conversely, extreme weather conditions can result in an oversupply of salvage vehicles that requires us to incur abnormal expenses to respond to market demands.
Mild weather conditions tend to result in a decrease in the available supply of salvage vehicles because traffic accidents decrease and fewer automobiles are damaged. Accordingly, mild weather can have fluctuatedan adverse effect on our salvage vehicle supply, only a portion of which are referred to as inventory, which would be expected to have an adverse effect on our revenue and operating results and related growth rates. Conversely, our salvage vehicle supply will tend to increase in poor weather such as a harsh winter or as a result of adverse weather-related conditions such as flooding. During periods of mild weather conditions, our ability to increase our revenues and improve our operating results and related growth will be increasingly dependent on our ability to obtain additional vehicle sellers and to compete more effectively in the market, each of which is subject to the other risks and uncertainties described in these sections. In addition, extreme weather conditions, although they increase the available supply of salvage cars, can have an adverse effect on our operating results. For example, during fiscal 2023, we recognized substantial additional costs associated with
34

Hurricane Ian. Weather events have had, in certain quarters, an adverse effect on our operating results, in part because of yard capacity constraints in the impacted areas of the U.S.
If we lose key management or are unable to attract and retain the talent required for our business, we may not be able to successfully manage our business or achieve our objectives.
Our future success depends in large part upon the leadership and performance of our executive management team, all of whom are employed on an at-will basis and none of whom are subject to any agreements not to compete. If we lose the service of one or more of our executive officers or key employees, in particular Willis J. Johnson, our Chairman, and A. Jayson Adair and Jeffrey Liaw, our Co-Chief Executive Officers, or if one or more of these executives decide to join a competitor or otherwise compete directly or indirectly with us, we may not be able to successfully manage our business or achieve our business objectives.
More generally, our future success also depends on our ability to attract and retain a talented workforce. The labor market is highly competitive, and our business could be adversely affected if we are unable to attract and retain talented personnel in our organization at appropriate staffing levels. In addition, because our core technology platform is internally developed, we face heightened risks relating to workforce recruitment and retention of key personnel with subject matter expertise relating to our technology platform.
The vehicle sales industry is highly competitive and we may not be able to compete successfully.
We face significant competition for the supply of salvage and other vehicles and for the buyers of those vehicles. We believe our principal competitors include other auction and vehicle remarketing service companies with whom we compete directly in obtaining vehicles from insurance companies and other sellers, and large vehicle dismantlers, who may buy salvage vehicles directly from insurance companies, bypassing the salvage sales process. Many of the insurance companies have established relationships with competitive remarketing companies and large dismantlers. Certain of our competitors may currently or in the future have greater financial resources than we do. Due to the limited number of vehicle sellers, particularly in the U.K., and other foreign markets, the absence of long-term contractual commitments between us and our sellers and the increasingly competitive market environment, there can be no assurance that our competitors will not gain market share at our expense.
We may also encounter significant competition for local, regional, and national supply agreements with vehicle sellers. There can be no assurance that the existence of other local, regional, or national contracts entered into by our competitors will not have a material adverse effect on our business or our expansion plans. Furthermore, we are likely to face competition from major competitors in the acquisition of vehicle storage facilities, which could significantly increase the cost of such acquisitions and thereby materially impede our expansion objectives or have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations. These potential new competitors may include consolidators of automobile dismantling businesses, organized salvage vehicle buying groups, automobile manufacturers, automobile auctioneers and software companies. While most vehicle sellers have abandoned or reduced efforts to sell salvage vehicles directly without the use of service providers such as us, there can be no assurance that this trend will continue, which could adversely affect our market share, consolidated results of operations and financial position. Additionally, existing or new competitors may be significantly larger and have greater financial and marketing resources than us; therefore, there can be no assurance that we will be able to compete successfully in the future.
Risks Related to Regulatory Compliance and Legal Matters
Our business activities and public policy interests expose us to political, regulatory, economic, and reputational risks.
Our business activities, facilities expansions, and civic and public policy interests may be unpopular in certain communities, exposing us to reputational and political risk. For example, public opposition in some communities to different aspects of our business operations has impacted our ability to obtain required business use permits. Additionally, our interests in legislative and regulatory processes at different levels of government in the geographies in which we operate have been opposed by competitors and other interest groups. Although we believe we generally enjoy positive community relationships and political support in our range of operations, shifting public opinion sentiments and sociopolitical dynamics could have an adverse effect on our business and reputation.
Our operations and acquisitions in the U.S. and certain foreign areas expose us to political, regulatory, economic, and reputational risks.
Although we have implemented policies, procedures, and training designed to ensure compliance with anti-bribery laws, trade controls and economic sanctions, and similar regulations, our employees or agents may take actions in violation of our policies. We may incur costs or other penalties in the event that any such violations occur, which could have an adverse effect on our business and reputation.
In some cases, the enforcement practices of governmental regulators in certain foreign areas and the procedural and substantive rights and remedies available to us may vary significantly from those in the United States, which could have an adverse effect on our business.
35

Although we face risks associated with international expansion in each of the non-U.S. markets where we operate, our current focus on the German market heightens the risks we face relating to our expansion plans in Germany.
In addition, some of our recent acquisitions have required us to integrate non-U.S. companies which had not previously been subject to U.S. law. In many countries outside of the United States, particularly in those with developing economies, it may be common for persons to engage in business practices prohibited by laws and regulations applicable to us, such as the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”), U.K. Bribery Act, Brazil Clean Companies Act, India’s Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 or similar local anti-bribery laws. These laws generally prohibit companies and their employees or agents from making improper payments for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Failure by us and our subsidiaries to comply with these laws could subject us to civil and criminal penalties that could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated operating results and financial position.
In addition, certain acquisitions in the U.K. may be reviewed by the CMA. If an inquiry is made by the CMA, we may be required to demonstrate that our acquisitions will not result, or be expected to result, in a substantial lessening of competition in the U.K. market. Although we believe that there will not be a substantial lessening of competition in the U.K. market, based on our analysis of the relevant U.K. markets, there can be no assurance that the CMA will agree with us if it decides to make an inquiry. If the CMA determines that by our acquisitions of certain assets, there is or likely will be a substantial lessening of competition in the U.K. market, we could be required to divest some portion of our U.K. assets. In the event of a divestiture order by the CMA, the assets disposed may be sold for substantially less than their carrying value. Accordingly, any divestiture could have a material adverse effect on our operating results in the period of the divestiture.
We face risks associated with transacting on a principal rather than agent basis, which may have an adverse impact on our gross margin percentages and expose us to inventory risks.
Certain of the vehicles that we remarket in the U.S. and foreign markets may be transacted either wholly or partially on the principal model, in which the vehicle is purchased and then resold for our own account, rather than the agency model, in which we generally act as a sales agent for the legal owner of vehicles. Further, operating on a principal basis exposes us to inventory risks, including losses from theft, damage, and obsolescence. In addition, our business in the U.S., Canada, and the U.K. has been established and grown based largely on our ability to build relationships with insurance carriers. In other markets, including Germany, insurers have traditionally been less involved in the disposition of vehicles. As we expand into markets outside the U.S., Canada, and the U.K., including Germany in particular, we cannot predict whether markets will readily adapt to our strategy of online auctions of automobiles sourced principally through vehicle insurers. Any failure of new markets to adopt our business model could adversely affect our consolidated results of operations and financial position.
Acquisitions typically will increase our sales and profitability although, given the typical size of our acquisitions to date, most acquisitions will not individually have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations and financial position. We may not always be able to introduce our processes and selling platform to acquired companies due to different operating models in international jurisdictions or other facts. As a result, the associated benefits of acquisitions may be delayed for years in some international situations. During this period, the acquisitions may operate at a loss and certain acquisitions, while profitable, may operate at a margin percentage that is below our overall operating margin percentage and, accordingly, have an adverse impact on our consolidated results of operations and financial position. Hence, the conversion periods vary from weeks to years and cannot be predicted.
Our business is subject to a variety of domestic and international laws and other obligations regarding privacy and data protection.
We are subject to federal, state and international laws, directives, and regulations relating to the collection, use, retention, disclosure, security, and transfer of personal data. These laws, directives, and regulations, and their interpretation and enforcement continue to evolve and may be inconsistent from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. For example, the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), which went into effect in the European Union on May 25, 2018, applies to all of our activities conducted from an establishment in the European Union and may also apply to related products and services that we offer to European Union users. Similarly, the California Consumer Privacy Act, or AB375 (“CCPA”), the California Privacy Act (“CPRA”), the Colorado Privacy Act (“CPA”), the Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act (“VCDPA”) and the Brazilian General Data Protection Law (“LGPD”), were also recently enacted and became effective in 2020 and these laws create new data privacy rights for individuals. Complying with the GDPR, the CCPA, the CPRA, the CPA, the VCDPA, the LGPD, and similar emerging and changing privacy and data protection requirements may cause us to incur substantial costs or require us to change our business practices. Noncompliance with our legal obligations relating to privacy and data protection could result in penalties, legal proceedings by governmental entities or others, and significant legal and financial exposure and could affect our ability to retain and attract customers. Any of the risks described above could adversely affect our consolidated results of operations and financial position.
Regulation of the vehicle sales industry may impair our operations, increase our costs of doing business, and create potential liability.
36

Participants in the vehicle sales industry are subject to, and may be required to expend funds to ensure compliance with a variety of laws, regulations, and ordinances. These include, without limitation, land use ordinances, business and occupational licensure requirements and procedures, vehicle titling, sales, and registration rules and procedures, and laws and regulations relating to the environment, anti-money laundering, anti-corruption, exporting, and reporting and notification requirements to agencies and law enforcement relating to vehicle transfers. Many of these laws and regulations are frequently complex and subject to interpretation, and failure to comply with present or future regulations or changes in interpretations of existing laws or regulations may result in impairment or suspension of our operations and the imposition of penalties and other liabilities. At various times, we may be involved in disputes with local governmental officials regarding the development and/or operation of our business facilities. We may be subject to similar types of regulations by governmental agencies in new markets. In addition, new legal or regulatory requirements or changes in existing requirements may delay or increase the cost of opening new facilities, may limit our base of vehicle buyers, may decrease demand for our vehicles, and may adversely impact our ability to conduct business.
Changes in laws or the interpretation of laws, including foreign laws and regulations, affecting the import and export of vehicles may have an adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
Our internet-based auction-style model has allowed us to offer our products and services to international markets and has increased our international buyer base. As a result, foreign importers of vehicles now represent a significant part of our total buyer base. As a result our foreign buyers may be subject to a variety of foreign laws and regulations, including the imposition of import duties by foreign countries. Changes in laws, regulations, and treaties that restrict or impede or negatively affect the economics surrounding the importation of vehicles into foreign countries may reduce the demand for vehicles and impact our ability to maintain or increase our international buyer base. In addition, we and our vehicle buyers must work with foreign customs agencies and other non-U.S. governmental officials, who are responsible for the interpretation, application, and enforcement of these laws, regulations, and treaties. Any inability to obtain requisite approvals or agreements from such authorities could adversely impact the ability of our buyers to import vehicles into foreign countries. In addition, any disputes or disagreements with foreign agencies or officials over import duties, tariffs, or similar matters, including disagreements over the value assigned to imported vehicles, could adversely affect our costs and the ability and costs of our buyers to import vehicles into foreign countries. For example, in March 2008, a decree issued by the president of Mexico became effective that placed restrictions on the types of vehicles that can be imported into Mexico from the U.S. The adoption of similar laws or regulations in other jurisdictions that have the effect of reducing or curtailing our activities abroad, changes in the interpretation, application, and enforcement of laws, regulations, or treaties, any failure to comply with non-U.S. laws or regulatory interpretations, or any legal or regulatory interpretations or governmental actions that significantly increase our costs or the costs of our buyers could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations and financial position by reducing the demand for our products and services and our ability to compete in non-U.S. markets.
The operation of our storage facilities poses certain environmental risks, which could adversely affect our consolidated results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.
Our operations are subject to international, federal, provincial, state and local laws and regulations regarding the protection of the environment in the countries in which we have storage facilities. In some cases, we may acquire land with existing environmental issues, including landfills as an example. In the salvage vehicle remarketing industry, large numbers of wrecked vehicles are stored at storage facilities, requiring us to actively monitor and manage potential environmental impacts. In the U.K., we provide vehicle de-pollution and crushing services for end-of-life vehicles. We could incur substantial expenditures for preventative, investigative, or remedial action and could be exposed to liability arising from our operations, contamination by previous users of certain of our acquired facilities or facilities which we may acquire in the future, or the disposal of our waste at off-site locations. In addition to conducting environmental diligence on new site acquisitions, we also take such appropriate actions as may be necessary to avoid liability for activities of prior owners, and we have from time to time acquired insurance with respect to acquired facilities with known environmental risks. There can be no assurances, however, that these efforts to mitigate environmental risk will prove sufficient if we were to face material liabilities. We have incurred expenses for environmental remediation in the past, and environmental laws and regulations could become more stringent over time. There can be expectedno assurance that we or our operations will not be subject to continue to fluctuatesignificant costs in the future on a quarterlyor that environmental enforcement agencies at the state and annual basis as a result of a number of factors,federal level will not pursue enforcement actions against us. In addition to acquiring insurance in connection with certain acquisitions, we have also obtained indemnification for pre-existing environmental liabilities from many of which are beyondthe persons and entities from whom we have acquired facilities, but there can be no assurance that such indemnifications will be available or sufficient. Any such expenditures or liabilities could have a material adverse effect on our control. Factors that may affect our operatingconsolidated results include, but are not limited to, the following:of operations, financial position, or cash flows.
•    fluctuationsChanges in the market valuefederal, state and local, or foreign tax laws, changing interpretations of salvage and used vehicles;
•    fluctuations in commodity prices, particularly the per ton price of crushed car bodies;
•    the impact of foreign exchange gain and loss as a result of international operations;
our ability to successfully integrate our newly acquired operations in international markets and any additional markets we may enter;
•    the availability of salvage vehicles;
•    variations in vehicle accident rates;
•    member participation in the Internet bidding process;
•    delays or changes in state title processing;
•    changes in international, state or federalexisting tax laws, or regulations affecting salvage vehicles;
•    changes in local laws affecting who may purchase salvage vehicles;
adverse determinations by tax authorities could increase our ability to integrate and manage our acquisitions successfully;
•    the timing and size of our new facility openings;
•    the announcement of new vehicle supply agreements by ustax burden or our competitors;
•    the severity of weather and seasonality of weather patterns;
the amount and timing of operating costs and capital expenditures relating to the maintenance and expansion of our     business, operations and infrastructure;
•    the availability and cost of general business insurance;
•    labor costs and collective bargaining;
•    changes in the current levels of out of state and foreign demand for salvage vehicles;
•    the introduction of a similar Internet product by a competitor; and
•    the ability to obtain necessary permits to operate.

Due to the foregoing factors, our operating results in one or more future periods can be expected to fluctuate. As a result, we believe that period-to-period comparisons ofotherwise adversely affect our results of operations, and financial condition.
37

We are not necessarily meaningfulsubject to taxation at the federal, state, provincial, and shouldlocal levels in the U.S., the U.K., and various other countries and jurisdictions in which we operate, including income taxes, sales taxes, value-added (“VAT”) taxes, and similar taxes and assessments. The laws and regulations related to tax matters are extremely complex and subject to varying interpretations. Although we believe our tax positions are reasonable, we are subject to audit by the Internal Revenue Service, “IRS”, in the United States, HM Revenue and Customs in the United Kingdom, state tax authorities in the states in which we operate, and other similar tax authorities in international jurisdictions. We have been subject to audits and challenges from applicable federal, state, or foreign tax authorities in the past, and may be subject to similar audits and challenges in the future. While we believe we comply with all applicable tax laws, rules, and regulations in the relevant jurisdictions, tax authorities may elect to audit us and determine that we owe additional taxes, which could result in a significant increase in our liabilities for taxes, interest, and penalties in excess of our accrued liabilities.
New tax legislative initiatives may be proposed from time to time, such as proposals for comprehensive tax reform in the United States, which may impact our effective tax rate and which could adversely affect our tax positions or tax liabilities. Our future effective tax rate could be adversely affected by, among other things, changes in the composition of earnings in jurisdictions with differing tax rates, changes in statutory rates and other legislative changes, changes in interpretations of existing tax laws, or changes in determinations regarding the jurisdictions in which we are subject to tax. From time to time, U.S. federal, state and local, and foreign governments make substantive changes to tax rules and their application, which could result in materially higher taxes than would be incurred under existing tax law and which could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.
For example, on August 16, 2022, the U.S. government enacted the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 which includes changes to the U.S. corporate income tax system, including a 15% minimum tax based on “adjusted financial statement income” for certain large corporations which will not be relied upon as any indicationeffective until fiscal year 2024 and a 1% excise tax on share repurchases after December 31, 2022. We are currently assessing the potential impact of future performance. In the event such fluctuations result in our financial performance being below the expectations of public market analyststhese legislative changes.
Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property and investors, the price of our common stock could decline substantially.Technology
Our Internet-basedinternet-based sales model has increased the relative importance of intellectual property assets to our business, and any inability to protect those rights could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, or results of operations.operations, or financial position.
Our intellectual property rights include patents relating to our auction technologies, as well as trademarks, trade secrets, copyrights, and other intellectual property rights. In addition, we may enter into agreements with third parties regarding the license or other use of our intellectual property. Effective intellectual property protection may not be available in every country in which our products and services are distributed, deployed, or made available. We seek to maintain certain intellectual property rights as trade secrets. The secrecy could be compromised by third parties, or intentionally or accidentally by our employees, which would cause us to lose the competitive advantage resulting from those trade secrets. Any significant impairment of our intellectual property rights, or any inability to protect our intellectual property rights, could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations and financial position.
We also may not be able to acquire or maintain appropriate domain names in all countries in which we do business. Furthermore, regulations governing domain names may not protect our trademarks and similar proprietary rights. We may be unable to prevent third parties from acquiring domain names that are similar to, infringe upon, or diminish the value of our trademarks and other proprietary rights.
We have in the past been and may in the future be subject to intellectual property rights claims, which are costly to defend, could require us to pay damages, and could limit our ability to use certain technologies in the future.
Litigation based on allegations of infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights are common among companies who rely heavily on intellectual property rights. Our reliance on intellectual property rights has increased significantly in recent years as we have implemented our auction-style sales technologies across our business and ceased conducting live auctions. Recent U.S. Supreme Court precedent potentially restricts patentability of software inventions by affirming that patent claims merely requiring application of an abstract idea on standard computers utilizing generic computer functions are patent ineligible, which may impact our ability to enforce our issued patent and obtain new patents. As we face increasing competition, the possibility of intellectual property rights claims against us increases. Litigation and any other intellectual property claims, whether with or without merit, can be time-consuming, expensive to litigate and settle, and can divert management resources and attention from our core business. An adverse determination in current or future litigation could prevent us from offering our products and services in the manner currently conducted. We may also have to pay damages or seek a license for the technology, which may not be available on reasonable terms and which may significantly increase our operating expenses, if it is available for us to license at all. We could also be required to develop alternative non-infringing technology, which could require significant effort and expense.
38

We have developed a proprietary enterprise operating system, and we may experience difficulties operating our business as we continue to design and develop this system.
We have developed a proprietary enterprise operating system to address our international expansion needs. The ongoing design, development, and implementation of our enterprise operating systems carries certain risks, including the risk of significant design or deployment errors causing disruptions, delays or deficiencies, which may make our website and services unavailable. This type of interruption could prevent us from processing vehicles for our sellers and may prevent us from selling vehicles through our internet bidding platform, VB3, which would adversely affect our consolidated results of operations and financial position. In addition, the transition to our internally developed proprietary system will continue to require us to commit substantial financial, operational and technical resources before the volume of business increases, without assurance that the volume of business will increase. We began using our internally developed proprietary system with our expansion into Spain in fiscal 2016 and Germany in fiscal 2017.
We may also implement additional or enhanced information systems in the future to accommodate our growth and to provide additional capabilities and functionality. The implementation of new systems and enhancements is frequently disruptive to the underlying business of an enterprise and can be time-consuming and expensive, increase management responsibilities and divert management attention. Any disruptions relating to our system enhancements or any problems with the implementation, particularly any disruptions impacting our operations or our ability to accurately report our financial performance on a timely basis during the implementation period, could materially and adversely affect our business. Even if we do not encounter these material and adverse effects, the implementation of these enhancements may be much more costly than we anticipated. If we experience problems withare unable to successfully implement the information systems enhancements as planned, our subhaulersfinancial position, results of operations, and trucking fleet operations, our businesscash flows could be harmed.negatively impacted.
We rely primarily upon independent subhaulersOur success depends on maintaining the integrity of our systems and infrastructure. As our operations continue to pick upgrow in both size and deliver vehiclesscope, domestically and internationally, we must continue to provide reliable, real-time access to our systems by our customers through improving and fromupgrading our storage facilities in the U.S., Canada, Brazil, U.A.E., Oman, Bahrain, Germany, the Republic of Ireland,systems and Spain. We also utilize, to a lesser extent, independent subhaulers in the U.K. Ourinfrastructure for enhanced products, services, features and functionality. Any failure to pick upmaintain the integrity of our systems and deliver vehiclesinfrastructure may result in a timely and accurate manner could harm our reputation and brand,loss of customers due, among other things, to slow delivery times, unreliable service levels, or insufficient capacity, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Further, an increase in fuel cost may lead to increased prices charged by our independent subhaulers, which may significantly increase our cost. We may not be able to pass these costs on business, consolidated results of operations, and financial position.
Disruptionsto our sellersinformation technology systems, including failure to prevent outages, maintain security, and prevent unauthorized access to our information technology systems and other confidential information, could disrupt our business and materially and adversely affect our reputation, consolidated results of operations, and financial condition.
Information availability and security risks for online commerce companies have significantly increased in recent years because of, in addition to other factors, the proliferation of new technologies, the use of the internet and telecommunications technologies to conduct financial transactions, and the increased sophistication and activities of organized crime, hackers, terrorists, and other external parties. These threats may derive from fraud or buyers.malice on the part of third parties or current or former employees. In addition, human error or accidental technological failure could make us vulnerable to information technology system disruptions and/or cyber-attacks, including the introduction of malicious computer viruses or code into our system, phishing attacks, ransomware attacks, or other information technology data security incidents.
Our operations rely on the secure processing, transmission, and storage of confidential, proprietary and other information in our computer systems and networks. Our customers and other parties in the payments value chain rely on our digital technologies, computer and email systems, software, and networks to conduct their operations. In addition, to using independent subhaulers,access our products and services, our customers increasingly use personal smartphones, tablet PCs, and other mobile devices that may be beyond our control.
Information technology system disruptions, cyber-attacks, ransomware attacks, or other cyber security incidents could materially and adversely affect our reputation, operating results, or financial condition by, among other things, making our auction platform inoperable for a period of time, damaging our reputation with buyers, sellers, and insurance companies as a result of the unauthorized disclosure of confidential information (including account data information), or resulting in governmental investigations, litigation, liability, fines, or penalties against us. If such attacks are not detected immediately, their effect could be compounded. While we maintain insurance coverage that may, subject to policy terms and conditions, cover certain aspects of these cyber risks, our insurance coverage may be insufficient to cover all losses and would not remedy damage to our reputation.
We have in the U.K.past identified attempts by unauthorized third parties to access our systems and disrupt our online auctions. These attempts have caused minor service interruptions, which were promptly addressed and resolved, and our online service was restored to normal business. For example, in April 2015, we utilize a fleetidentified that unauthorized third parties had gained access to data provided to us by our members that is considered to be personal information in certain jurisdictions. We immediately investigated, including the engagement of company trucksan external expert security firm, and made the required notifications to pick upmembers whose information may have been accessed and deliver vehicles fromto regulatory agencies.
39

We are regularly evaluating and implementing new technologies and processes to manage risks relating to cyber-attacks and system and network disruptions, including but not limited to usage errors by our U.K. storage facilities. In connection therewith,employees, power outages, and catastrophic events such as fires, tornadoes, floods, hurricanes, and earthquakes. We have further enhanced our security protocols based on the investigation we are subjectconducted in response to the security incident. Nevertheless, we cannot provide assurances that our efforts to address prior data security incidents and mitigate against the risk of future data security incidents or system failures will be successful. The techniques used by criminals to obtain unauthorized access to sensitive data change frequently and are often not recognized immediately. We may be unable to anticipate these techniques or implement adequate preventative measures and believe that cyber-attacks and threats against us have occurred in the past and are likely to continue in the future. If our systems are compromised again in the future, become inoperable for extended periods of time, or cease to function properly, we may have to make a significant investment to fix or replace them, and our ability to provide many of our electronic and online solutions to our customers may be impaired. In the event of a ransomware attack, we could suffer significant financial and reputational harm, regardless of whether we choose to pay the ransom amount. In addition, as cyber-threats continue to evolve, we may be required to expend significant additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures or to investigate and remediate any information security vulnerabilities. Any of the risks associated with providing truckingdescribed above could materially and adversely affect our consolidated results of operations and financial position.
Rapid technological changes may render our technology obsolete or decrease the competitiveness of our services.
To remain competitive, we must continue to enhance and improve the functionality and features of our websites and software. The internet and the online commerce industry are rapidly changing. In particular, the online commerce industry is characterized by increasingly complex systems and infrastructures. If competitors introduce new services embodying new technologies or if new industry standards and practices emerge, our existing websites and proprietary technology and systems may become obsolete. Our future success will depend on our ability to:
•    enhance our existing services;
•    develop, access, acquire, and license new services and technologies that address the increasingly sophisticated and varied needs of our current and prospective customers; and
•    respond to technological advances and emerging industry standards and practices in a cost-effective and timely basis.
Developing our websites and other proprietary technology entails significant technical and business risks. We may use new technologies ineffectively or we may fail to adapt our websites, transaction-processing systems, and network infrastructure to customer requirements or emerging industry standards. If we face material delays in introducing new services, products, and enhancements, our customers and suppliers may forego the use of our services and use those of our competitors. 
Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock
Our annual and quarterly performance may fluctuate, causing the price of our stock to decline.
Our revenues and operating results have fluctuated in the past and can be expected to continue to fluctuate in the future on a quarterly and annual basis as a result of a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control. Factors that may affect our operating results include, but are not limited to, the following:
•    fluctuations in the market value of salvage and used vehicles;
•    fluctuations in commodity prices, particularly the per ton price of crushed car bodies;
•    the impact of foreign exchange gain and loss as a result of international operations;
the impact of potential negative interest rates on our cash reserves;
•    our ability to successfully integrate our newly acquired operations in international markets and any additional markets we may enter;
the availability of salvage vehicles or other vehicles we sell including inclementthe supply of used and salvage vehicles in relation to the supply of new vehicle alternatives;
•    variations in vehicle accident rates;
variations in total loss frequency rates;
supply chain disruptions;
•    member participation in the internet bidding process;
•    delays or changes in state title processing;
•    changes in international, state or federal laws, regulations, or treaties affecting the vehicles we sell;
40

•    changes in the application, interpretation, and enforcement of existing laws, regulations or treaties;
•    trade disputes and other political, diplomatic, legal, or regulatory developments;
•    inconsistent application or enforcement of laws or regulations by regulators, governmental or quasi-governmental entities, or law enforcement or quasi-law enforcement agencies, as compared to our competitors;
•    changes in laws affecting who may purchase the vehicles we sell;
•    the timing and size of our new facility openings;
•    the announcement of new vehicle supply agreements by us or our competitors;
•    the severity of weather disruptions in transportation infrastructure, accidents and related injury claims,seasonality of weather patterns;
•    the amount and timing of operating costs and capital expenditures relating to the maintenance and expansion of our business, operations, and infrastructure;
•    the availability and cost of general business insurance;
•    labor costs and collective bargaining;
•    changes in the current levels of out of state and foreign demand for salvage vehicles;
•    the introduction of a similar internet product by a competitor;
•    the ability to obtain or maintain necessary permits to operate;
goodwill impairment;
crimes committed against us, including theft, forgery, and counterfeit payments;
•    military conflicts, including the Russian invasion of Ukraine;
•    bank failures;
natural and man-made disasters;
•    public health issues, including COVID-19 and other pandemics;
monetary policy and potential inflation impacts, including any adverse effects of inflation on our cash reserves; and
•    political issues.
41

Due to the foregoing factors, our operating results in one or more future periods can be expected to fluctuate. As a result, we believe that period-to-period comparisons of our results of operations are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as any indication of future performance. In the event such fluctuations result in our financial performance being below the expectations of public market analysts and investors, the price of fuel, any of whichour common stock could result in an increase in our operating expenses and reduction in our net income.decline substantially.
We are partially self-insured for certain losses and if our estimates of the cost of future claims differ from actual trends, our results of operations could be harmed.
We are partially self-insured for certain losses related to our different lines of insurance coverage including, without limitation, medical insurance, general liability, workers’ compensation, and auto liability. Our liability represents an estimate of the ultimate cost of claims incurred as of the balance sheet date. The estimated liability is not discounted and is established based upon analysis of historical data and actuarial estimates. Further, we utilize independent actuaries to assist us in establishing the proper amount of reserves for anticipated payouts associated with these self-insured exposures. While we believe these estimates are reasonable based on the information currently available, if actual trends, including the severity of claims and medical cost inflation, differ from our estimates, our results of operations could be impacted.

Our executive officers, directors, and their affiliates hold a large percentage of our stock and their interests may differ from other stockholders.
Our executive officers, directors and their affiliates beneficially own, in the aggregate, 15.9%more than 11% of our issued and outstanding common stock as of January 31, 2018.2023. If they were to act together, these stockholders would have significant influence over most matters requiring approval by stockholders, including the election of directors, any amendments to our certificate of incorporation and certain significant corporate transactions, including potential merger or acquisition transactions. In addition, without the consent of these stockholders, we could be delayed or prevented from entering into transactions that could be beneficial to us or our other investors. These stockholders may take these actions even if they are opposed by our other investors.
We have certain provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws which may have an anti-takeover effect or that may delay, defer or prevent acquisition bids for us that a stockholder might consider favorable and limit attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management.
Our boardBoard of directorsDirectors is authorized to create and issue from time to time, without stockholder approval, up to an aggregate of 5,000,000 shares of undesignated preferred stock, the terms of which may be established and shares of which may be issued without stockholder approval, and which may include rights superior to the rights of the holders of common stock. In addition, our bylaws establish advance notice requirements for nominations for elections to our boardBoard of directorsDirectors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at stockholder meetings. These anti-takeover provisions and other provisions under Delaware law could discourage, delay or prevent a transaction involving a change in control of our company, even if doing so would benefit our stockholders. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for stockholders to elect directors of their choosing and cause us to take other corporate actions the stockholders desire.
IfOur amended and restated certificate of incorporation designates the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware as the exclusive forum for certain disputes between us and our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to choose the judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers, or employees.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that, unless we lose key managementconsent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the sole and exclusive forum for (i) any derivative action or are unableproceeding brought on our behalf, (ii) any action or proceeding asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any of our directors, officers, or other employees to attractus or our stockholders, (iii) any action or proceeding asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the Delaware General Corporation Law, our amended and retainrestated certificate of incorporation, or our amended and restated bylaws, or (iv) any action or proceeding asserting a claim that is governed by the talent requiredinternal affairs doctrine, shall be the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware.
This provision does not apply to suits brought to enforce a duty or liability created by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for which the U.S. federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring or holding or owning (or continuing to hold or own) any interest in any of our business,securities shall be deemed to have notice of and consented to the foregoing provisions. Although we believe this exclusive forum provision benefits us by providing increased consistency in the application of Delaware law in the types of lawsuits to which it applies, the exclusive forum provision may (i) increase the costs for a stockholder, and/or (ii) limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum of its choosing for disputes with us or any of our directors, officers, other employees, stockholders, or others which may discourage lawsuits with respect to such claims. Our stockholders will not be deemed to have waived our compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder as a result of our exclusive forum provision. Further, in the event a court finds the exclusive forum provision contained in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to be unenforceable or inapplicable in an action, we may not be able to successfully manageincur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could harm our business or achieve our objectives.results of operations.
Our future success depends in large part upon the leadership and performance
42

General Risk Factors
Cash investments are subject to risks.
We may invest our excess cash in securities or money market funds backed by securities, which may include U.S. treasuries, other federal, state and municipal debt, bonds, preferred stock, commercial paper, insurance contracts and other securities both privately and publicly traded. All securities are subject to risk, including fluctuations in interest rates, credit risk, market risk, and systemic economic risk. Changes or movements in any of these investment-related risk factorsitems may result in a loss or impairment to our invested cash and may have a material effect on our consolidated results of operations and financial position.
Rapid technological changes may render our technology obsolete or decrease the competitiveness of our services.
To remain competitive, we must continue to enhance and improve the functionality and features of our websites and software. The Internet and the online commerce industry are rapidly changing. In particular, the online commerce industry is characterized by increasingly complex systems and infrastructures. If competitors introduce new services embodying new technologies or if new industry standards and practices emerge, our existing websites and proprietary technology and systems may become obsolete. Our future success will depend on our ability to:
enhance our existing services;
develop and license new services and technologies that address the increasingly sophisticated and varied needs of our current and prospective customers; and
respond to technological advances and emerging industry standards and practices in a cost-effective and timely basis.
Developing our websites and other proprietary technology entails significant technical and business risks. We may use new technologies ineffectively or we may fail to adapt our websites, transaction-processing systems and network infrastructure to customer requirements or emerging industry standards. If we face material delays in introducing new services, products and enhancements, our customers and suppliers may forego the use of our services and use those of our competitors.

New member programs could impact our operating results.
We have or will initiate programs to open our auctions to the general public. These programs include the Registered Broker program through which the public can purchase vehicles through a registered member and the Market Maker program through which registered members can open Copart storefronts with Internet kiosks enabling the general public to search our inventory and purchase vehicles. Initiating programs that allow access to our online auctions to the general public will involve material expenditures and we cannot predict what future benefit, if any, will be derived.
Factors such as mild weather conditions can have an adverse effect on our revenues and operating results, as well as our revenue and earnings growth rates, by reducing the available supply of salvage vehicles. Conversely, extreme weather conditions can result in an oversupply of salvage vehicles that requires us to incur abnormal expenses to respond to market demands.
Mild weather conditions tend to result in a decrease in the available supply of salvage vehicles because traffic accidents decrease and fewer automobiles are damaged. Accordingly, mild weather can have an adverse effect on our salvage vehicle inventories, which would be expected to have an adverse effect on our revenue and operating results and related growth rates. Conversely, our inventories will tend to increase in poor weather such as a harsh winter or as a result of adverse weather-related conditions such as flooding. During periods of mild weather conditions, our ability to increase our revenues and improve our operating results and related growth will be increasingly dependent on our ability to obtain additional vehicle sellers and to compete more effectively in the market, each of which is subject to the other risks and uncertainties described in these sections. In addition, extreme weather conditions, although they increase the available supply of salvage cars, can have an adverse effect on our operating results. For example, during fiscal 2006, fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2018, we recognized substantial additional costs associated with Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, Sandy, and Harvey. Weather events have had, in certain quarters, an adverse effect on our operating results, in part because of yard capacity constraints in the impacted areas of the U.S. These additional costs were characterized as “abnormal” under ASC 330, Inventory, and included premiums for subhaulers, payroll, equipment and facilities expenses directly related to the operating conditions created by the hurricanes. In the event that we were to again experience extremely adverse weather or other anomalous conditions that result in an abnormally high number of salvage vehicles in one or more of our markets, those conditions could have an adverse effect on our future operating results.
Macroeconomic factors such as high fuel prices, declines in commodity prices, declinesfluctuations in used car prices, and vehicle-related technological advances may have an adverse effect on our revenues and operating results, as well as our earnings growth rates.
Macroeconomic factors that affect oil prices and the automobile and commodity markets can have adverse effects on our revenues, revenue growth rates (if any), and operating results. Significant increases in the cost of fuel could lead to a reduction in miles driven per car and a reduction in accident rates. A material reduction in accident rates, whether due to, among other things, a reduction in miles driven per car, vehicle-related technological advances such as accident avoidance systems and, to the extent widely adopted, the advent of autonomous vehicles, could have a material impact on revenue growth. Similarly, a reduction in total loss frequency rates, due to among other things, sharp increases in used car prices that make it less economical for insurance company sellers to declare a vehicle involved in an accident a total loss, could also have a material impact on revenue growth. In addition, under our Percentage Incentive Program contracts, which we refer to as PIP, the cost of towingtransporting the vehicle to one of our facilities is included in the PIP fee. We may incur increased fees, which we may not be able to pass on to our vehicle sellers. A material increase in towtransportation rates could have a material impact on our operating results. Volatility in fuel, commodity, and used car prices could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and revenue growth rates in future periods.
The salvage vehicle sales industry is highly competitive and we may not be able to compete successfully.
We face significant competition for the supply of salvage vehicles and for the buyers of those vehicles. We believe our principal competitors include other auction and vehicle remarketing service companies with whom we compete directly in obtaining vehicles from insurance companies and other sellers, and large vehicle dismantlers, who may buy salvage vehicles directly from insurance companies, bypassing the salvage sales process. Many of the insurance companies have established relationships with competitive remarketing companies and large dismantlers. Certain of our competitors may have greater financial resources than us. Due to the limited number of vehicle sellers, particularly in the U.K., the absence of long-term contractual commitments between us and our sellers and the increasingly competitive market environment, there can be no assurance that our competitors will not gain market share at our expense.
We may also encounter significant competition for local, regional and national supply agreements with vehicle sellers. There can be no assurance that the existence of other local, regional or national contracts entered into by our competitors will not have a material adverse effect on our business or our expansion plans. Furthermore, we are likely to face competition from major competitors in the acquisition of vehicle storage facilities, which could significantly increase the cost of such acquisitions and thereby materially impede our expansion objectives or have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations. These potential new competitors may include consolidators of automobile dismantling businesses, organized salvage vehicle buying groups, automobile manufacturers, automobile auctioneers and software companies. While most vehicle sellers have abandoned or reduced efforts to sell salvage vehicles directly without the use of service providers such as us, there can be no assurance that this trend will continue, which could adversely affect our market share, consolidated results of operations and financial position. Additionally, existing or new competitors may be significantly larger and have greater financial and marketing resources than us; therefore, there can be no assurance that we will be able to compete successfully in the future.

Government regulation of the salvage vehicle sales industry may impair our operations, increase our costs of doing business and create potential liability.
Participants in the salvage vehicle sales industry are subject to, and may be required to expend funds to ensure compliance with a variety of governmental, regulatory and administrative rules, regulations, land use ordinances, licensure requirements and procedures, including but not limited to those governing vehicle registration, the environment, zoning and land use. Failure to comply with present or future regulations or changes in interpretations of existing regulations may result in impairment of our operations and the imposition of penalties and other liabilities. At various times, we may be involved in disputes with local governmental officials regarding the development and/or operation of our business facilities. We believe that we are in compliance in all material respects with applicable regulatory requirements. We may be subject to similar types of regulations by federal, national, international, provincial, state and local governmental agencies in new markets. In addition, new regulatory requirements or changes in existing requirements may delay or increase the cost of opening new facilities, may limit our base of salvage vehicle buyers and may decrease demand for our vehicles.
Changes in laws or the interpretation of laws, including foreign laws and regulations, affecting the import and export of vehicles may have an adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
Our Internet-based auction-style model has allowed us to offer our products and services to international markets and has increased our international buyer base. As a result, foreign importers of vehicles now represent a significant part of our total buyer base. As a result our foreign buyers may be subject to a variety of foreign laws and regulations, including the imposition of import duties by foreign countries. Changes in laws and regulations that restrict the importation of vehicles into foreign countries may reduce the demand for vehicles and impact our ability to maintain or increase our international buyer base. In addition, we and our vehicle buyers must work with foreign customs agencies and other non-U.S. governmental officials, who are responsible for the interpretation of these laws. Any inability to obtain requisite approvals or agreements from such authorities could adversely impact the ability of our buyers to import vehicles into foreign countries. In addition, any disputes or disagreements with foreign agencies or officials over import duties or similar matters, including disagreements over the value assigned to imported vehicles, could adversely affect our costs and the ability and costs of our buyers to import vehicles into foreign countries. For example, in March 2008, a decree issued by the president of Mexico became effective that placed restrictions on the types of vehicles that can be imported into Mexico from the U.S. The adoption of similar laws or regulations in other jurisdictions that have the effect of reducing or curtailing our activities abroad, any failure to comply with non-U.S. laws or regulatory interpretations, or any legal or regulatory interpretations that significantly increase our costs or the costs of our buyers could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations and financial position by reducing the demand for our products and services and our ability to compete in non-U.S. markets.
The operation of our storage facilities poses certain environmental risks, which could adversely affect our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Our operations are subject to federal, state, national, provincial and local laws and regulations regarding the protection of the environment in the countries which we have storage facilities. In some cases, we may acquire land with existing environmental issues, including landfills as an example. In the salvage vehicle remarketing industry, large numbers of wrecked vehicles are stored at storage facilities and during that time, spills of fuel, motor oil and other fluids may occur, resulting in soil, surface water or groundwater contamination. In addition, certain of our facilities generate and/or store petroleum products and other hazardous materials, including waste solvents and used oil. In the U.K., we provide vehicle de-pollution and crushing services for end-of-life program vehicles. We could incur substantial expenditures for preventative, investigative or remedial action and could be exposed to liability arising from our operations, contamination by previous users of certain of our acquired facilities or facilities which we may acquire in the future, or the disposal of our waste at off-site locations. Environmental laws and regulations could become more stringent over time and there can be no assurance that we or our operations will not be subject to significant costs in the future. Although we have obtained indemnification for pre-existing environmental liabilities from many of the persons and entities from whom we have acquired facilities, there can be no assurance that such indemnifications will be adequate. Any such expenditures or liabilities could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations and financial position.
Adverse U.S. and international economic conditions may negatively affect our business, operating results, orand financial condition.
The capital and credit markets have historically experienced extreme volatility and disruption, which has in the past and may in the future lead to economic downturns in the U.S. and abroad. As a result of any economic downturn, the number of miles driven may decrease, which may lead to fewer accident claims, a reduction of vehicle repairs, and fewer salvage vehicles. Increases in unemployment, as a result of any economic downturn, may lead to an increase in the number of uninsured motorists. Uninsured motorists are responsible for disposition of their vehicle if involved in an accident. Disposition generally is either the repair or disposal of the vehicle. In the situation where the owner of the wrecked vehicle, and not an insurance company, is responsible for its disposition, we believe it is more likely that vehicle will be repaired or, if disposed, disposed through channels other than us. Adverse credit markets may also affect the ability of members to secure financing to purchase salvaged vehicles which may adversely affect demand. In addition, if the banking system or the financial markets deteriorate or are volatile, our credit facility or our ability to obtain additional debt or equity financing may be affected. These adverse economic conditions and events may have a negative effect on our business, consolidated results of operations, and financial position.

If we determine that our goodwill has become impaired, we could incur significant charges that would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations.
Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair market value of assets acquired in business combinations. As of January 31, 2018, the amount of goodwill on our consolidated balance sheet subject to future impairment testing was $344.5 million.
Pursuant to ASC 350, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other, we are required to annually test goodwill to determine if impairment has occurred, either through a quantitative or qualitative analysis. Additionally, interim reviews must be performed whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred. If the testing performed indicates that impairment has occurred, we are required to record a non-cash impairment charge for the difference between the carrying value of the goodwill and the implied fair value of the goodwill in the period the determination is made. The annual goodwill impairment analysis, which was performed qualitatively in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, considered all relevant factors specific to our reporting units, including macroeconomic conditions; industry and market considerations; overall financial performance and relevant entity-specific events. Changes in these factors, or changes in actual performance, could affect the fair value of goodwill, which may result in an impairment charge. For example, deterioration in worldwide economic conditions could affect these assumptions and lead us to determine that goodwill impairment is required. We cannot accurately predict the amount or timing of any impairment of assets. We considered the above factors noting none involved significant uncertainty. In addition, the industry in which we operate improved over the observable period, and our calculated fair value exceeded carrying value for each reporting unit by a substantial amount in our prior year quantitative analysis, indicating no material risk as of January 31, 2018, with respect to potential goodwill impairments. Should the value of our goodwill become impaired, it could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations and could result in our incurring net losses in future periods.
Changes in federal, state and local, or foreign tax laws, changing interpretations of existing tax laws, or adverse determinations by tax authorities could increase our tax burden or otherwise adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.
We are subject to taxation at the federal, state, provincial, and local levels in the United States, the United Kingdom, and various other countries and jurisdictions in which we operate, including income taxes, sales taxes, value-added (VAT) taxes, and similar taxes and assessments. The laws and regulations related to tax matters are extremely complex and subject to varying interpretations. Although we believe our tax positions are reasonable, we are subject to audit by the Internal Revenue Service in the United States, HM Revenue and Customs in the United Kingdom, state tax authorities in the states in which we operate, and other similar tax authorities in international jurisdictions. As previously disclosed, we have been subject to challenge by the Georgia Department of Revenue with respect to sales taxes and could face similar audits or challenges from applicable federal, state, or foreign tax authorities in the future. While we believe we comply with all applicable tax laws, rules, and regulations in the relevant jurisdictions, tax authorities may elect to audit us and determine that we owe additional taxes, which could result in a significant increase in our liabilities for taxes, interest, and penalties in excess of our accrued liabilities.
New tax legislative initiatives may be proposed from time to time, such as proposals for comprehensive tax reform in the United States, which may impact our effective tax rate and which could adversely affect our tax positions or tax liabilities. Our future effective tax rate could be adversely affected by, among other things, changes in the composition of earnings in jurisdictions with differing tax rates, changes in statutory rates and other legislative changes, changes in interpretations of existing tax laws, or changes in determinations regarding the jurisdictions in which we are subject to tax. From time to time, U.S. federal, state and local, and foreign governments make substantive changes to tax rules and their application, which could result in materially higher taxes than would be incurred under existing tax law and which could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Reform” or “Tax Act”) was enacted on December 22, 2017. The Tax Act significantly revamped U.S. taxation of corporations, including a reduction of the federal income tax rate from 35% to 21%, a repeal of the exceptions to the $1.0 million deduction limitation for performance-based compensation to covered employees, and a new tax regime for foreign earnings. The repeal of the $1.0 million deduction limit for performance-based compensation, the new U.S. taxes on accumulated and future foreign earnings and other adverse changes resulting from the Tax Act, or a change in the mix of domestic and foreign earnings, might offset the benefit from the reduced tax rate, and our future effective tax rates and/or cash taxes may increase, even significantly, or not decrease much, compared to recent or historical trends. Many of the provisions of the Tax Act are highly complex and may be subject to further interpretive guidance from the IRS or others. Some of the provisions of the Tax Act may be changed by a future Congress or challenged by the World Trade Organization (“WTO”). Although we cannot predict the nature or outcome of such future interpretive guidance, or actions by a future Congress or WTO, they could adversely impact our consolidated results of operations and financial position. Income tax expense on accumulated foreign earnings recorded as a result of the Tax Act is a provisional amount and reflects our current best estimate, which may be adjusted over the course of the next year and could adversely affect our consolidated results of operations and financial position.

New accounting pronouncements or new interpretations of existing standards could require us to make adjustments to accounting policies that could adversely affect the consolidated financial statements.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, and the SEC, from time to time issue new pronouncements or new interpretations of existing accounting standards that require changes to our accounting policies and procedures. To date, we do not believe any new pronouncements or interpretations have had a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations and financial position, but future pronouncements or interpretations could require a change or changes in our policies or procedures.
Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could result in declines in our reported revenues and earnings.
Our reported revenues and earnings are subject to fluctuations in currency exchange rates. We do not engage in foreign currency hedging arrangements; consequently, foreign currency fluctuations may adversely affect our revenues and earnings. Should we choose to engage in hedging activities in the future we cannot be assured our hedges will be effective or that the costs of the hedges will not exceed their benefits. Fluctuations in the rate of exchange between the U.S. dollar and foreign currencies, primarily the British pound, Canadian dollar, Brazilian real, European Union euro, U.A.E. dirham, Bahraini dinar, Omani rial, Brazilian real, Indian rupee, Chinese renminbi, and European Union EuroBahraini dinar could adversely affect our consolidated results of operations and financial position.
On June 23, 2016, the U.K. held a referendum in which voters approved an exit from the European Union, commonly referred to as “Brexit.” In February 2017, the British Parliament voted in favor
43

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
None.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
None.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not Applicable.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
44

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
a)Exhibits
a)Exhibits
3.1
3.2
3.3
31.110
31.1*
31.231.2*
31.3*
32.1(1)32.1**
32.2(1)32.2**
32.3**
101.INSXBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
(1)104In accordance with Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-KCover Page Interactive Date File, formatted in Inline Extensible Business Reporting Language (iXBRL) and SEC Release No. 33-8238 and 34-47986, Final Rule: Management’s Reports on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and Certification of Disclosurecontained in Exchange Act Periodic Reports, theExhibit 101
*Filed herewith
**The certifications furnished in Exhibits 32.1, 32.2 and 32.232.3 hereto are deemed to accompany this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act.Act of 1934, as amended. Such certifications will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.


45

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
COPART, INC.
COPART, INC./s/ LEAH STEARNS
/s/ Jeffrey Liaw
Jeffrey Liaw,Leah Stearns, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and duly Authorized Officer)
Date: February 27, 2018

24, 2023
47
46