UNITED STATES
                     SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                           Washington, D.C. 20549

                                  FORM 10-Q

            (X) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
                   OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                                     OR

            ( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
                   OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


             For the quarterly period ended: JuneSeptember 30, 2005

                      Commission file number: 001-15985


                           UNION BANKSHARES, INC.


                         VERMONT          03-0283552

                                P.O. BOX 667
                                 MAIN STREET
                            MORRISVILLE, VT 05661

                Registrant's telephone number:  802-888-6600

Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report: Not applicable

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes    X    No
                                                     -----      -----

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes         No    X
                                                 -----      -----

Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes         No    X
                                                 -----      -----

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes
of common stock as of JulyOctober 31, 2005:
      Common Stock, $2 par value          4,554,6634,557,663 shares


  1


                           UNION BANKSHARES, INC.
                              TABLE OF CONTENTS


PART l      FINANCIAL INFORMATION


Item 1.  Financial Statements

Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
  Union Bankshares, Inc. and Subsidiary
    Consolidated Balance Sheets                                           3
    Consolidated Statements of Income                                     4
    Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity             5
    Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows                                 6
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements                      8

Item 2.  Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
         and Results of Operations                                       10
Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk      32
Item 4.  Controls and Procedures                                         3233

PART II     OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings                                               32
      Item 4.  Submission of Matters to Vote of Security Holders33
Item 6.  Exhibits                                                        3233

Signatures                                                               33


  2


Part l Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements

Union Bankshares, Inc. and Subsidiary
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in Thousands)

JuneSeptember 30, December 31, 2005 2004 ---- ---- AssetsAssets: Cash and due from banks $ 15,99512,534 $ 16,930 Federal funds sold and overnight deposits 3,9488,628 4,187 -------- -------- Cash and cash equivalents 19,94321,162 21,117 Interest bearing deposits in banks 6,21512,079 7,509 Investment securities available-for-sale 31,71234,945 40,966 Loans held for sale 6,4577,287 8,814 Loans 285,882289,885 271,421 Allowance for loan losses (3,022)(3,023) (3,067) Unearned net loan fees (156)(155) (166) -------- -------- Net loans 282,704286,707 268,188 -------- -------- Accrued interest receivable 1,6461,733 1,528 Premises and equipment, net 5,3795,408 5,121 Other assets 7,2637,671 6,286 -------- -------- Total assets $361,319$376,992 $359,529 ======== ======== Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity Liabilities DepositsEquity: Liabilities: Deposits: Non-interest bearing $ 45,94351,190 $ 57,221 Interest bearing 256,739266,716 249,377 -------- -------- Total deposits 302,682317,906 306,598 Borrowed funds 13,80313,539 7,934 Accrued interest and other liabilities 3,7804,075 2,594 -------- -------- Total liabilities 320,265335,520 317,126 -------- -------- Commitments and Contingencies Stockholders' EquityEquity: Common stock, $2.00 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; 4,915,611 shares issued at 6/9/30/05 and 12/31/04 9,831 9,831 Paid-in capital 107 107 Retained earnings 32,62933,030 33,810 Treasury stock at cost; 360,948 shares at 6/9/30/05 and 12/31/04 (1,722) (1,722) Accumulated other comprehensive income 209226 377 -------- -------- Total stockholders' equity 41,05441,472 42,403 -------- -------- Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $361,319$376,992 $359,529 ======== ========
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements 3 Union Bankshares, Inc. and Subsidiary Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited) (Dollars in Thousands except Per Share Data)
Three Months Ended SixNine Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, JuneSeptember 30, 2005 2004 2005 2004 ---- ---- ---- ---- Interest incomeincome: Interest and fees on loans $ 4,9135,241 $ 4,3414,523 $ 9,55214,793 $ 8,65013,172 Interest on debt securities Taxable 296 432 645 866303 458 948 1,324 Tax exempt 4745 54 100 107145 161 Dividends 21 15 40 3224 17 64 49 Interest on federal funds sold and overnight deposits 98 11 135 24 7 37 12 Interest on interest bearing deposits in banks 5571 53 114 102185 155 --------- --------- --------- --------- Total interest income 5,356 4,902 10,488 9,7695,782 5,116 16,270 14,885 --------- --------- --------- --------- Interest expenseexpense: Interest on deposits 921 726 1,686 1,4821,108 719 2,794 2,201 Interest on borrowed funds 101 91 195 179160 87 355 266 --------- --------- --------- --------- Total interest expense 1,022 817 1,881 1,6611,268 806 3,149 2,467 --------- --------- --------- --------- Net interest income 4,334 4,085 8,607 8,1084,514 4,310 13,121 12,418 Provision for loan losses - 30 - - -30 --------- --------- --------- --------- Net interest income after provision for loan losses 4,334 4,085 8,607 8,1084,514 4,280 13,121 12,388 --------- --------- --------- --------- Noninterest incomeincome: Trust income 64 47 129 9167 57 196 148 Service fees 729 694 1,403 1,356756 718 2,159 2,074 Net gains on sales of investment securities 1- - 1 25 Net gains on sales of loans held for sale 23 54 119 23448 62 167 296 Other income 91 75 141 12629 45 170 171 --------- --------- --------- --------- Total noninterest income 908 870 1,793 1,832900 882 2,693 2,714 --------- --------- --------- --------- Noninterest expenses: Salaries and wages 1,408 1,312 2,785 2,7211,444 1,358 4,229 4,079 Pension and employee benefits 520 529 1,035 1,126497 408 1,532 1,534 Occupancy expense, net 198 189 402 381190 174 592 555 Equipment expense 244 221 512 441277 250 789 691 Other expenses 907 898 1,724 1,656944 832 2,668 2,488 --------- --------- --------- --------- Total noninterest expense 3,277 3,149 6,458 6,3253,352 3,022 9,810 9,347 --------- --------- --------- --------- Income before provision for income taxes 1,965 1,806 3,942 3,6152,062 2,140 6,004 5,755 Provision for income taxes 532 501 1,114 1,036568 641 1,682 1,677 --------- --------- --------- --------- Net income $ 1,4331,494 $ 1,3051,499 $ 2,8284,322 $ 2,5794,078 ========= ========= ========= ========= Earnings per common share $ 0.310.33 $ 0.290.33 $ 0.620.95 $ 0.570.90 ========= ========= ========= ========= Weighted average number of common shares outstanding 4,554,663 4,550,7264,551,171 4,554,663 4,550,5204,550,738 ========= ========= ========= ========= Dividends per common share $ 0.24 $ 0.22 $ 0.881.12 $ 0.440.66 ========= ========= ========= =========
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements 4 Union Bankshares, Inc. and Subsidiary Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (Unaudited) (Dollars in Thousands)
Common Stock ------------------ Accumulated Shares, other Total net of Paid-in Retained Treasury comprehensive stockholders' Treasury Amount capital earnings stock income (loss) equity -------- ------ ------- -------- -------- ------------- ------------- Balance,Balances, December 31, 2004 4,554,663 $9,831 $107 $33,810 $(1,722) $377 $42,403 ------- Comprehensive income: Net income - - - 2,8284,322 - - 2,8284,322 Change in net unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities available-for-sale, net of reclassification adjustment and tax effects - - - - - (168) (168)(151) (151) ------- Total comprehensive income 2,6604,171 ------- Cash dividends declared ($0.881.12 per share) - - - (4,009)(5,102) - - (4,009) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Balance June(5,102) --------- ------ ---- ------- ------- ---- ------- Balances, September 30, 2005 4,554,663 $9,831 $107 $32,629$33,030 $(1,722) $209 $41,054 ====================================================================================$226 $41,472 ========= ====== ==== ======= ======= ==== =======
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements 5 Union Bankshares, Inc. and Subsidiary Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
SixNine Months Ended -------------------------------------------------- (Dollars in Thousands) JuneSeptember 30, JuneSeptember 30, 2005 2004 ---- ---- Cash Flows From Operating Activities Net Income $ 2,8284,322 $ 2,5794,078 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities Depreciation 379 327588 516 Provision (credit)for loan losses -- 30 (Credit) provision for deferred income taxes 14 (12)(212) 193 Net amortization on investment securities 72 115112 165 Equity in losses of limited partnerships 95 62156 107 Write-downs of impaired assets --- 42 (Decrease) increase in unamortized loan fees (10) 8(11) 3 Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale 9,856 13,395 Originals13,810 19,436 Originations of loans held for sale (7,380) (7,158)(12,116) (10,181) Net gain on sales of investment securities (1) (25) Net gain on sales of loans held for sale (119) (234)(167) (296) Net gain on sales of other real estate owned (1) (1) Net gain on disposals of premises and equipment (1) (5)(2) (7) (Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable (118) 118 Decrease(205) 23 (Increase) decrease in other assets 140 253(114) 213 Decrease in income taxes (174) (47) Decrease(105) (91) Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable (1) (136)89 (84) Increase in other liabilities 613 289749 233 -------- -------- Net cash provided by operating activities 6,193 9,5716,892 14,354 -------- -------- Cash Flows From Investing Activities Interest bearing deposits in banks Maturities and redemptions 1,392 1,7851,581 2,088 Purchases (98) (1,779)(6,151) (2,477) Investment securities available-for-sale Sales 1,994 529 Maturities, calls and paydowns 7,932 6,39711,297 11,340 Purchases (999) (9,829)(7,611) (10,008) Increase in loans, net (14,793) (788)(18,807) (22,376) Recoveries of loans charged off 31 3343 109 Purchases of premises and equipment (637) (815)(875) (1,022) Investments in limited partnerships (142) - 6 June 30, June 30, 2005 2004 ---- ---- Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment 1 122 14 Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned -- 11 Proceeds from sales of repossessed property 811 - -------- -------- Net cash used in investing activities (5,311) (4,455)(18,658) (21,792) -------- -------- 6 Nine Months Ended ------------------------------ (Dollars in Thousands) September 30, September 30, 2005 2004 ---- ---- Cash Flows From Financing Activities Increase(Decrease) increase in borrowings outstanding, net 5,869 5,8135,605 (483) Proceeds from exercise of stock options - 913 Net decreaseincrease (decrease) in non-interest bearing deposits (11,278) (514)(6,031) 7,651 Net increase (decrease) in interest bearing deposits 7,362 (17,877)17,339 (4,311) Dividends paid (4,009) (2,002)(5,102) (3,003) -------- -------- Net cash used inprovided by (used in) financing activities (2,056) (14,571)11,811 (133) -------- -------- Change in cash and cash equivalents $ (1,174)45 $ (9,455)(7,571) Cash and cash equivalents Beginning $ 21,117 $ 24,540 -------- -------- Ending $ 19,94321,162 $ 15,08516,969 ======== ======== Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information: Interest paid $ 1,8823,061 $ 1,7962,551 ======== ======== Income taxes paid $ 5551,001 $ 1,0951,575 ======== ======== Supplemental Schedule of Noncash Investing and Financing Activities: Other real estate acquired in settlement of loans $ 244 $ 200 ======== ======== Repossessed property acquired in settlement of loans $ 12 $ -9 ======== ======== Investment in limited partnerships acquired by capital contributions payable $ (748) $ - ======== ======== Total change in net unrealized gain on investment securities available-for-sale $ (255)(230) $ (889)(303) ======== ========
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements 7 UNION BANKSHARES, INC. NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: Note 1. Basis of Presentation The accompanying interim unaudited consolidated financial statements of Union Bankshares, Inc. (the Company) for the interim periods ended JuneSeptember 30, 2005 and 2004, and for the quarters then ended have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), general practices within the banking industry, and the accounting policies described in the Company's Annual Report to Shareholders and Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. In the opinion of the Company's management, all adjustments, (consistingconsisting only of normal recurring adjustments)adjustments, and disclosures necessary for a fair presentation of the information contained herein have been made. This information should be read in conjunction with the Company's 2004 Annual Report to Shareholders, 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K, and current reports on Form 8-K. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the full fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, or any other interim period. Certain amounts in the 2004 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2005 presentation. Note 2. Commitments and Contingencies In the normal course of business, the Company is involved in various legal proceedings. In the opinion of management after consulting with the Company's Legal Counsel,legal counsel, any liability resulting from such proceedings would not have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition or results of operations. Note 3. Per Share Information Earnings per common share amounts are computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period and reduced for shares held in treasury. The assumed conversion of available stock options does not result in material dilution. On January 14, 2005, the Company declaredIn addition to regular quarterly cash dividends per share dividend information a special one-time cash dividend of $0.40 per share declared and paid in addition to the regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.24 per share to shareholders of record on January 24, 2005. These cash dividends aggregating approximately $2.9 million were2005 and funded by available cash resources. Note 4. New Accounting Pronouncements On June 1, 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, a replacement of Accounting PrincipalsPrinciples Board (APB) Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3. The Statement applies to all voluntary changes in accounting principle, and changes the requirements for accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods' financial statements of a voluntary change in accounting principle unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effects of the change. APB Opinion No. 20 previously required that most voluntary changes in accounting principle be recognized by including in net income of the period of the change the cumulative effect of changing to the new accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 improves financial reporting because its requirements enhance the consistency of financial information between periods. SFAS No. 154 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005, with early adoption permitted. The Company has adopted SFAS No. 154, which has had no impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations. On March 29, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 107 - Interaction of SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment and certain SEC rules and regulations. SAB No. 107 provides guidance from the SEC staff related to share-based payment transactions with nonemployees, the transition from nonpublic to public entity status, valuation methods (including assumptions such as expected volatility and expected term), the accounting for certain redeemable financial instruments issued under share-based payment arrangements, the classification of compensation expense, non-GAAP financial measures, first-timefirst- time adoption of SFAS 123R in an interim period, capitalization of compensation cost related to share-based payment arrangements, the 8 accounting for income tax effects of share-based payment arrangements upon adoption of SFAS 123R, the 8 modification of employee share options prior to adoption of SFAS 123R, and disclosures in Management's Discussion and Analysis ("MD&A") subsequent to adoption of SFAS 123R. SFAS 123R, issued in December 2004, is effective beginning January 1, 2006, and will require the Company to expense share-basedshare- based payments under the "modified prospective" method. Under this method, compensation expense is recognized at the time of the grant for all share-basedshare- based payments granted after January 1, 2006, and also for all awards granted prior to January 1, 2006 that remain unvested on the effective date. The Company has no unvested share- basedshare-based payments as of JuneSeptember 30, 2005. As of such date, the Company had not adopted the transitional provisions of SFAS No. 123, but had continued to account for its stock option plan in accordance with the provisions of APB pinionOpinion No. 25. The Company does not expect that the adoption of SFAS No. 123R will have a significant impact on its results of operations or inancialfinancial position but management is still in the process of analyzing the future cost of stock options under the revised statement and the required disclosure requirements of SAB 107. Note 5. Stock Option Plan The Company has a stock option plan and continues to apply the intrinsic value based method of accounting in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees", and related Interpretations.Interpretations (see Note 4). No stock-based employee compensation cost is reflected in net income, as all stock options granted under the plan had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. Had compensation costs been determined on the basis of fair value pursuant to FASB Statement No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation", the effects on net income and earnings per common share for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2005 and 2004, would have approximated:
Three Months Ended SixNine Months Ended ---------------------- ---------------------- 2005 2004 2005 2004 ---- ---- ---- ---- (dollars in thousands) (dollars in thousands) Net income as reported $1,433 $1,305 $2,828 $2,579$1,494 $1,499 $4,322 $4,078 Deduct: Total stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects 0- (5) 0 (9)- (14) ------ ------ ------ ------ Pro forma net income $1,433 $1,300 $2,828 $2,570$1,494 $1,494 $4,322 $4,064 ====== ====== ====== ====== Earnings per common share: As reported $ 0.310.33 $ 0.290.33 $ 0.620.95 $ 0.570.90 Pro forma $ 0.310.33 $ 0.290.33 $ 0.620.95 $ 0.570.89
Note 6. Defined Benefit Pension Plan Union Bank (Union), the Company's bank subsidiary sponsors a non- contributory defined benefit pension plan covering all eligible employees. The plan provides defined benefits based on years of service and final average salary. Net periodic pension benefit cost for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2005 and 2004, consisted of the following components:
Three Months Ended SixNine Months Ended ------------------ --------------------------------- 2005 2004 2005 2004 ---- ---- ---- ---- (dollars in thousands) Service cost $116 $ 92 $232 $204$102 $348 $306 Interest cost on projected benefit obligation 121 112 242 218120 109 362 327 Expected return on plan assets (107) (93) (214) (181)(90) (321) (271) Amortization of prior service cost 1 2 1 4 35 5 Amortization of net loss 15 19 30 4120 45 61 ---- ---- ---- ---- Net periodic benefit cost $147 $131 $294 $285$145 $143 $439 $428 ==== ==== ==== ====
9 Note 7. Other Comprehensive Income The components of other comprehensive income (loss) and related tax effects for the three and sixnine month periods ended JuneSeptember 30, 2005 and 2004 are as follows:
Three Months Ended SixNine Months Ended June------------------ ----------------- September 30, JuneSeptember 30, ------------- ------------- 2005 2004 2005 2004 ---- ---- ---- ---- (dollars in thousands) Unrealized holding gains (losses) on investment securities available-for-sale $152 $(1,265) $(254) $(905)$26 $ 586 $(228) $(319) Reclassification adjustment for gains realized in income (1)- - (1) (25) Reclassification adjustment for losses recognized in income on impaired investment securities - 41- - 41 ---- ---------- ----- ----- ----- Net unrealized gains (losses) 151 (1,224) (255) (889)26 586 (229) (303) Tax effect 51 (416) (87) (302) ---- -------(9) (199) 78 103 --- ----- ----- ----- Net of tax amount $100$17 $ (808) $(168) $(587) ==== =======387 $(151) $(200) === ===== ===== =====
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS GENERAL The following discussion and analysis by management focuses on those factors that had a material effect on Union Bankshares, Inc.'s (the Company's) financial position as of JuneSeptember 30, 2005, and as of December 31, 2004, and its results of operations for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2005 and 2004. This discussion is being presented to provide a narrative explanation of the financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes and with other financial data appearing elsewhere in this filing. In the opinion of the Company's management, the interim unaudited data reflects all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, and disclosures necessary to fairly present the Company's consolidated financial position and results of operations for the interim period. Management is not aware of the occurrence of any events after JuneSeptember 30, 2005, which would materially affect the information presented. CAUTIONARY ADVICE ABOUT FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS The Company may from time to time make written or oral statements that are considered "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements may include financial projections, statements of plans and objectives for future operations, estimates of future economic performance and assumptions relating thereto. The Company may include forward-looking statements in its filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), in its reports to stockholders, including this Quarterly Report, in other written materials, and in statements made by senior management to analysts, rating agencies, institutional investors, representatives of the media and others. Forward-looking statements reflect management's current expectations and are subject to uncertainties, both general and specific, and risk exists that those predictions, forecasts, projections and other estimates contained in forward-looking statements will not be achieved. Also, when any of the words "believes," "expects," "anticipates," "intends," "plans," "seeks," "estimates", or similar expressions are used, forward-looking statements are being made. Many possible events or factors, including those beyond the control of management, could affect the future financial results and performance of the Company. This could cause results or performance to differ materially from those expressed in forward-lookingforward- 10 looking statements. The possible events or factors that might affect forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following: * uses of and changes in monetary, fiscal, and tax policy by various governmentsgovernments; * political, legislative, or regulatory developments in Vermont, New Hampshire, or the United States including changes in laws concerning accounting, taxes, banking, and other aspects of the financial services industryindustry; * developments in general economic or business conditions nationally or in Vermont and northern New Hampshire, including interest rate fluctuations, market fluctuations and perceptions, job creation and unemployment rates, ability to attract new business, and inflation and their effect on the Company or its customerscustomers; * developments in economic or business conditions in the Canadian province of Quebec which borders the Company's market area including fluctuations in the value of the U.S. or Canadian dollar; * changes in the competitive environment for financial services organizations, including increased competition from tax-advantaged credit unionsunions; * the Company's ability to retain key personnelpersonnel; * changes in technology including demands for greater automation which could present operational issues or significant capital outlaysoutlays; * acts or threats of terrorism or war and actions taken by the United States or other governments that might adversely affect business or economic conditions for the Company or its customerscustomers; * adverse changes in the securities market which could adversely affect the value of the Company's stockstock; * unanticipated lower revenues, loss of customers or business, or higher operating expensesexpenses; * the failure of assumptions underlying the establishment of the allowance for loan losses, and estimations of values of collateral, and various financial assets and liabilitiesliabilities; * the amount that we invest in new business opportunities and the timing of these investmentsinvestments; * the failure of actuarial, investment, work force, salary and other assumptions underlying the establishment of the reservereserves for future pension costscosts; * future cash requirements might be higher than anticipated due to loan commitments, or unused lines of credit being drawn upon, or depositors withdrawing their fundsfunds; * assumptions made regarding interest rate movement and sensitivity could vary substantially if actual experience differs from historical experience which could adversely affect the Company's results of operationsoperations; and * the creditworthiness of current loan customers is different from our understanding or changes dramatically, and therefore the allowance for loan losses becomes inadequateinadequate. When evaluating forward-looking statements to make decisions with respect to the Company, investors and others are cautioned to consider these and other risks and uncertainties and are reminded not to place undue reliance on such statements. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made and the Company undertakes no obligation to update them to reflect new or changed information or events, except as may be required by federal securities laws. CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES The Company has established various accounting policies which govern the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America in the preparation of the Company's financial statements. Certain accounting policies involve significant judgments and assumptions by management which have a material impact on the reported amount of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying related notes. The SEC has defined a company's critical accounting policies as the ones that are most important to the portrayal of the company's financial condition and results of operations, and which require the company to make its most difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain. Based on this definition, the Company has identified the accounting policies and judgments most critical to the 11 Company. The judgments and assumptions used by management are based on historical experience and other factors, which are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Because of the nature of the judgments and assumptions made by management, actual results could differ from these judgments and 11 estimates that could have a material impact on the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the results of operations of the Company. The Company believes the allowance for loan losses is a critical accounting policy that requires the most significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements. In estimating the allowance for loan losses, management utilizes historical experience as well as other factors including the effect of changes in the local real estate market on collateral values, the effect on the loan portfolio of current economic indicators and their probable impact on borrowers and changes in delinquent, nonperforming or impaired loans. Changes in these factors may cause management's estimate of the allowance for loan losses to increase or decrease and result in adjustments to the Company's provision for loan losses in future periods. The Company also has other key accounting policies that are significant to understanding the results, which involve the use of estimates, judgments, and assumptions that are significant to understandingassumptions. These include the results, including the liability accrual for the defined benefit pension plan, valuation of deferred tax assets and analysis of potential impairment of investment securities. For additional information see FINANCIAL CONDITION - Allowance for Loan Losses below. Although management believes that its estimates, assumptions, and judgments are reasonable, they are based upon information presently available. Actual results may differ significantly from these estimates under different assumptions, judgments or conditions. OVERVIEW The Company's net income was $1.494 million for the quarter ended JuneSeptember 30, 2005, was $1.433 million, compared with net income of $1.305$1.499 million for the secondthird quarter of 2004, or a 9.8% increase0.3% decrease between years. The company'sincrease in net interest income of $204 thousand between quarters was offset by the increase in noninterest expenses. For additional information see quarterly results analysis beginning on page 16. The Company's net income was $4.322 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2005, was $2.828 million, compared with net income of $2.579$4.078 million for the same period in 2004, or a 9.7%6.0% increase between years. A quarterly cash dividend of $0.24 per share was declared and paid in April,July 2005, in addition to a quarterly cash dividenddividends of $0.24 per share declared and paid in January and April 2005. Also a special cash dividend of $0.40 per share was declared and paid in January 2005. A special dividend was declared2005 as the Company's primary capital ratio approached 12%, on December 31, 2004, approached 12%, 2004 earnings were better than anticipated, and the current tax treatment of dividends iswas beneficial to shareholders. The Company remainsremained well capitalized after payment of the regular and special dividends. The Company's total assets increased from $359 million at December 31, 2004, to $361$377 million at JuneSeptember 30, 2005.2005, an increase of 4.9%. Loans and loans held for sale increased a net $12.1 million, while investments decreased $9.3$16.9 million reflecting the continuing high demand for loans.loans despite the rising interest rates. Investment securities available-for-sale decreased $6.0 million of which $4.6 million was reinvested in FDIC insured interest bearing deposits in banks where there is no credit risk and the yields obtained have been favorable. The remainder of the funds were utilized to fund loan demand. The increase in loans was also funded by an increase in borrowings of $5.9$5.6 million and an increase in deposits of $11.3 million. 12 The following per share information and key ratios depict several measurements of performance or financial condition for or at the quartersthree and sixnine months ending JuneSeptember 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively:
Quarter Ended Year to Date ------------------------------ ------------------------------ JuneYear-to-Date ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- September 30, 2005 JuneSeptember 30, 2004 JuneSeptember 30, 2005 JuneSeptember 30, 2004 ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------------------------- ------------------ ------------------ ------------------ Return on average assets (ROA) (1) 1.61% 1.49% 1.60% 1.47%1.69% 1.60% 1.55% Return on average equity (ROE) (1) 14.13% 12.78% 13.89% 12.62%14.57% 14.47% 14.12% 13.26% Net interest margin (1)(2) 5.36% 5.15% 5.36% 5.16%5.26% 5.30% 5.30% 5.19% Efficiency ratio (3) 62.53% 62.62% 62.10% 62.86%61.91% 57.48% 62.03% 61.15% Net interest spread (4) 5.05% 4.90% 5.06% 4.92%4.91% 5.03% 4.98% 4.94% Loan to deposit ratio 96.58% 92.79% 96.58% 92.79%93.48% 92.28% 93.48% 92.28% Net loan charge-offs to average loans 0.06% 0.00% 0.03%0.00% 0.02% 0.00% Allowance for loan losses to loans 1.10% 1.19% 1.10% 1.19%1.04% 1.12% 1.04% 1.12% Non-performing assets to total assets 1.52% 1.22% 1.52% 1.22%1.00% 0.07% 1.00% 0.07% Equity to assets 11.36% 11.91% 11.36% 11.91%11.00% 11.62% 11.00% 11.62% Total capital to risk assets 17.71% 18.39% 17.71% 18.39%17.32% 18.12% 17.32% 18.12% Book value per share $ 9.01 $ 9.00 $ 9.01 $ 9.00$9.11 $9.20 $9.11 $9.20 Earnings per share $ 0.31 $ 0.29 $ 0.62 $ 0.57$0.33 $0.33 $0.95 $0.90 Dividends paid per share $ 0.24 $ 0.22 $ 0.88 $ 0.44$0.24 $0.22 $1.12 $0.66 Dividend payout ratio (5) 77.42% 76.70% 141.94% 77.63%72.73% 66.78% 117.89% 73.64% - -------------------- Annualized The ratio of tax equivalent net interest income to average earning assets. The ratio of noninterest expense to net interest income and noninterest income excluding securities gains and losses. The difference between the average rate earned on assets minus the average rate paid on liabilities. Cash dividenddividends declared and paid per share divided by consolidated net income per share.
The prime interest rate has risen fourrose six times during the first nine months of 2005 and twice during the fourth quarter of 2004 by 25 basis points each time, to stand at 6.25%6.75% as of JuneSeptember 30, 2005.2005 from its 4.75% level as of September 30, 2004. This is the highest the prime rate hashad been since September 17,August, 2001. The prime rate duringwas static at 4% for the first six months of 2004, was static at 4.00%.and rose three times, by 25 basis points each time during the third quarter of 2004, to 4.75% as of September 30, 2004. The rise in the prime rate is partially responsible for the 2011 basis point increase in the Company's Net Interest Margin year over year, as variable rate loans have reacted more fully and quickly than core deposit rates to thesethe increases in the prime rate. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Net Interest Income. The largest component of the Company's operating income is net interest income, which is the difference between interest and dividend income received from interest-earning assets and the interest expense paid on its interest-bearing liabilities. The Company's net interest income increased by $249$204 thousand, or 6.1%4.73%, to $4.33$4.51 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2005, from $4.09$4.31 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2004. The net interest spread increased 15decreased 12 basis points to 5.05%4.91% for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2005, from 4.90%5.03% for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2004, as interest rates paid on liabilities and earned on assets both moved upward in response to the increases in the prime rate.rate, but as the yield curve continued to flatten, the interest rates on short term and nonmaturity deposits moved up more quickly. The net interest margin for the secondthird quarter of 2005 increased 21decreased 4 basis points to 5.36%5.26% from the 2004 period at 5.15%5.30% reflecting a rising rate environment.environment in which interest rates paid on liabilities rose at a faster pace than interest rates earned on assets. For the first sixnine months of 2005, net interest income increased $499$703 thousand, or 6.15%5.66%, to $8.61$13.12 million, from $8.11$12.42 million for the year earlier period. The net interest spread increased 144 basis points or 2.8%, to 5.06%4.98% for the first sixnine months of 2005 compared to 4.92%4.94% for the first sixnine months of 2004. The net interest margin increased 2011 basis points or 3.9%, to 5.36%5.30% for the first sixnine months of 2005 compared to 5.16%5.19% for the same period in 2004. A decrease in prime rate would not necessarily be beneficial to Unionthe Company in the near term, see "OTHER FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS - Market Risk and Asset and Liability Management." 13 Yields Earned and Rates Paid. The following table shows, for the periods indicated, the total amount of income recorded from interest-earning assets, and the related average yields, the interest expense associated with interest-bearing liabilities, expressed in dollars and average rates, and the relative net interest spread and net interest margin. All yield and rate information is calculated on an annualized tax equivalent basis. Yield and rate information for a period is average information for the period, and is calculated by dividing the annualized income or expense item for the period by the average balance of the appropriate balance sheet item during the period. Net interest margin is annualized tax equivalent net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets. Nonaccrual loans are included in asset balances for the appropriate periods, but recognition of interest on such loans is discontinued and any remaining accrued interest receivable is reversed in conformity with federal regulations. The yields, net interest spreadspreads, and net interest margins appearing in the following table have been calculated on a pre-tax basis:
Three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2005 2004 ------------------------------- ------------------------------- Interest Average Interest Average Average Earned/ Yield/ Average Earned/ Yield/ Balance Paid Rate Balance Paid Rate ------- -------- ------- ------- -------- ------- (dollars in thousands) Average Assets Federal funds sold and overnight deposits $ 3,32911,301 $ 24 2.79%98 3.40% $ 3,8633,418 $ 7 0.73%11 1.27% Interest bearing deposits in banks 6,545 55 3.33% 6,6468,095 71 3.51% 6,703 53 3.17%3.15% Investment securities (1), (2) 34,525 352 4.35% 43,580 494 4.75%32,602 359 4.66% 43,336 521 5.02% Loans, net (1), (3) 284,639 4,913 7.00% 268,685 4,341 6.56%293,794 5,241 7.17% 273,059 4,523 6.63% FHLB of Boston stock 1,241 12 3.90%13 4.15% 1,241 7 2.14%8 2.49% -------- ------ ---- -------- ------ ---- Total interest-earning assets (1) 330,279 5,356 6.60% 324,015 4,902 6.16%347,033 5,782 6.71% 327,757 5,116 6.27% Cash and due from banks 12,760 13,57112,096 12,696 Premises and equipment 5,378 4,8415,400 4,965 Other assets 7,605 8,7478,247 7,389 -------- -------- Total assets $356,022 $351,174$372,776 $352,807 ======== ======== Average Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity: NOW accounts $ 50,60453,831 $ 6367 0.50% $ 44,83344,883 $ 4445 0.40% Savings/money market accounts 109,342 294 1.08% 111,494 203110,678 382 1.37% 112,153 206 0.73% Time deposits 96,431 564 2.35% 93,871 479 2.05%100,992 659 2.59% 90,866 468 2.04% Borrowed funds 8,842 101 4.52% 10,334 91 3.48%13,686 160 4.58% 9,391 87 3.63% -------- ------ ---- -------- ------ ---- Total interest-bearing liabilities 265,219 1,022 1.55% 260,532 817 1.26%279,187 1,268 1.80% 257,293 806 1.24% Non-interest bearing deposits 46,296 46,40548,436 50,961 Other liabilities 3,955 3,376 -------- --------4,136 3,353 Total liabilities 315,470 310,313331,759 311,607 Stockholders' equity 40,552 40,86141,017 41,200 -------- -------- Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $356,022 $351,174$372,776 $352,807 ======== ======== Net interest income $4,334 $4,085$4,514 $4,310 ====== ====== Net interest spread (1) 5.05% 4.90%4.91% 5.03% ==== ==== Net interest margin (1) 5.36% 5.15%5.26% 5.30% ==== ==== - -------------------- Average yield reported on a tax-equivalent basis. Average balances of investment securities are calculated on the amortized cost basis. Includes loans held for sale and is net of unearned income and allowance for loan losses.
14
SixNine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2005 2004 ------------------------------- ------------------------------- Interest Average Interest Average Average Earned/ Yield/ Average Earned/ Yield/ Balance Paid Rate Balance Paid Rate ------- -------- ------- ------- -------- ------- (dollars in thousands) Average Assets: Federal funds sold and overnight deposits $ 2,7465,629 $ 37 2.67%135 3.16% $ 3,3723,387 $ 12 0.74%24 0.92% Interest bearing deposits in banks 6,969 114 3.29% 6,581 102 3.10%7,349 185 3.37% 6,622 155 3.11% Investment securities (1), (2) 37,020 762 4.37% 42,267 990 4.90%35,531 1,121 4.46% 43,450 1,511 4.85% Loans, net (1), (3) 280,549 9,552 6.93% 267,020 8,650 6.57%285,012 14,793 6.98% 269,048 13,172 6.58% FHLB of Boston Stock 1,241 36 3.86% 1,241 23 3.71% 1,241 15 2.46%2.47% -------- ------- ---- -------- ------------- ---- Total interest-earning assets (1) 328,525 10,488 6.51% 320,481 9,769334,762 16,270 6.56% 323,748 14,885 6.20% Cash and due from banks 13,186 16,52512,819 15,240 Premises and equipment 5,297 4,7015,332 4,790 Other assets 7,461 8,7377,726 7,523 -------- -------- Total assets $354,469 $350,444$360,639 $351,301 ======== ======== Average Liabilities and Stockholder's Equity: Now accounts $ 47,90649,903 $ 114 0.48%181 0.49% $ 44,18844,422 $ 87133 0.40% Savings/money market accounts 109,856 535 0.98% 111,359 413 0.75%110,133 917 1.11% 111,625 619 0.74% Time deposits 93,395 1,037 2.24% 94,606 982 2.09%95,955 1,696 2.36% 93,350 1,449 2.07% Borrowed funds 8,991 195 4.32% 9,896 179 3.57%10,573 355 4.43% 9,742 266 3.59% -------- ------- ---- -------- ------------- ---- Total interest-bearing liabilities 260,148 1,881 1.45% 260,049 1,661 1.28%266,564 3,149 1.58% 259,139 2,467 1.27% Non-interest bearing deposits 50,050 46,28649,526 47,855 Other liabilities 3,558 3,2363,750 3,221 -------- -------- Total liabilities 313,756 309,571319,840 310,215 Stockholder's equity 40,713 40,87340,799 41,086 -------- -------- Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $354,469 $350,444$360,639 $351,301 ======== ======== Net interest income $ 8,607 $8,108$13,121 $12,418 ======= ============= Net interest spread (1) 5.06% 4.92%4.98% 4.94% ==== ==== Net interest margin (1) 5.36% 5.16%5.30% 5.19% ==== ==== - -------------------- Average yield reported on a tax-equivalent basis. The average balance of investment securities is calculated on the amortized cost basis. Includes loans held for sale and is net of unearned income and allowance for loan losses.
Rate/Volume Analysis. The following tables describe the extent to which changes in interest rates and changes in volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities have affected the Company's interest income and interest expense during the periods indicated. For each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided on changes attributable to: * changes in volume (change in volume multiplied by prior rate); * changes in rate (change in rate multiplied by current volume); and * total change in rate and volume. Changes attributable to both rate and volume, including the extra day in 2004 due to leap year, have been allocated proportionately to the change due to volume and the change due to rate. 15
Three Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, 2005 Compared to Three Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, 2004 Increase/(Decrease) Due to Change In ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Volume Rate Net ------ ---- --- (dollars in thousands) Interest-earning assets: Federal funds sold and overnight deposits $ (2)50 $ 1937 $ 1787 Interest bearing deposits in banks (1) 3 212 6 18 Investment securities (102) (40) (142)(125) (37) (162) Loans, net 269 303 572349 369 718 FHLB of Boston stock -0 5 5 ----- ---- ---- --------- Total interest-earning assets 164 290 454286 380 666 Interest-bearing liabilities: NOW accounts 710 12 1922 Savings/money market accounts (5) 96 91(3) 179 176 Time deposits 15 70 8556 135 191 Borrowed funds (15) 25 1047 26 73 ----- ---- ---- --------- Total interest-bearing liabilities 2 203 205110 352 462 ----- ---- ---- --------- Net change in net interest income $162 $ 87 $249176 $ 28 $ 204 ===== ==== ==== ========= SixNine Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, 2005 Compared to SixNine Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, 2004 Increase/(Decrease) Due to Change In --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume Rate Net ------ ---- --- (dollars in thousands) Interest-earning assets: Federal funds sold and overnight deposits $ (5)24 $ 3087 $ 25111 Interest bearing deposits in banks 6 6 1217 13 30 Investment securities (123) (105) (228)(271) (119) (390) Loans, net 434 468 902801 820 1,621 FHLB of Boston stock - 8 8 ---- ---- ------ 13 13 ----- ----- ------ Total interest-earning assets 312 407 719571 814 1,385 Interest-bearing liabilities: NOW accounts 8 19 27 Savings/17 31 48 Saving/money market accounts (6) 128 122(8) 306 298 Time deposits (14) 69 5540 207 247 Borrowed funds (17) (33) 16 ---- ---- ----23 66 89 ----- ----- ------ Total interest-bearing liabilities (29) 249 220 ---- ---- ----72 610 682 ----- ----- ------ Net change in net interest income $341 $158 $499 ==== ==== ====$ 499 $ 204 $ 703 ===== ===== ======
Quarter Ended JuneSeptember 30, 2005, compared to Quarter Ended JuneSeptember 30, 2004. Interest and Dividend Income. The Company's interest and dividend income increased $454$666 thousand, or 9.3%13.02%, to $5.36$5.78 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2005, from $4.90$5.12 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2004, with average earning assets increasing $6.3$19.3 million, or 1.9%5.9%, to $330.3$347.0 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2005, from $324.0$327.8 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2004. The increase in interest income resulting from the rise in average earning assets was augmented by the higher rates earned on the majority of these assets in 2005 versus 2004. Average loans approximated $284.6$293.8 million at an average yield of 7.00%7.17% for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2005, up from $268.7$273.1 million at an average yield of 6.56%6.63% for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2004, or a 5.9%7.6% increase in volume and a 4454 basis point increase in yield. The 16 strongest growth between the two years was in the commercial real estate market where new loan volume was strong due to relatively low long- 16 termlong-term market interest rates, , positive local economic trends and opportunities brought about by further consolidation in the banking industry. Quarterly average loans secured by real estate increased $12.7$15.7 million, or 5.7%6.9%, to $236.9$242.3 million for the secondthird quarter of 2005, from $224.2$226.6 million for the secondthird quarter of 2004. This increase was the result of strong demand for residential and commercial real estate in the Company's market.market including the Company's increase presence in Franklin and Chittenden Counties in Vermont resulting from the opening of a loan production office in St. Albans, Vermont, during the first quarter of 2005. This demand was influenced in part by low long-term interest rates, and high demand and prices in the Chittenden County, Vermont, market, which is contiguous to the Company's and is fueling growth in the Company's market. This demand was also influenced by continued consolidation in the banking industry, which has given Union Bank the opportunity to establish relationships with customers that choose to do business with community banks. Municipal loans increased $4.7decreased $1.9 million, or 29.0%8.9%, to an average of $20.9$19.7 million in 2005 from an average of $16.2$21.6 million in 2004. Average commercial loans decreased slightly year to year, decreasing $466 thousand, r 2.1%increased $3.3 million, or 14.6%, to $21.5$25.8 million for 2005 compared to $22.0$22.5 million for 2004.2004, due primarily to the addition of one large commercial relationship in 2005. The average balance of investments (including mortgage-backed securities) decreased $9.1$10.7 million or 20.8%24.8% to $34.5$32.6 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2005, from $43.6$43.3 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2004. The decrease in the investment portfolio in 2005 reflects the continuing growth in the loan portfolio.portfolio as well as redirecting some of the maturing cash flow into interest bearing deposits in banks. The average level of federal funds sold and overnight deposits decreased $534 thousandincreased $7.9 million, or 13.8%230.6%, to $3.3$11.3 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2005, from $3.9$3.4 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2004.2004, as Union Bank managed cash flow and liquidity during the third quarter and took advantage of the rapid increase in short term interest rates during that period. Interest income from non-loan instruments was $443$541 thousand for the secondthird quarter of 2005 and $561$593 thousand for the same period of 2004, reflecting the decreaseoverall increase in yields in the investment portfolio andoffset by the overall decrease in volume as the majority of paydowns and matured, called or sold securities and interest bearing deposits in banks were utilized to fund the loan demand.volume. Interest Expense. The Company's interest expense increased $ 205$462 thousand, or 25.1%57.3%, to $1.0$1.3 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2005, from $817$806 thousand for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2004 as rates paid on funds started to move up while the volume of average2004. Average interest-bearing liabilities increased $4.7$21.9 million, or 1.8%8.5%, to $265.2$279.2 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2005, from $260.5$257.3 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2004.2004 and the average rate paid increase 56 basis points to 1.80% from 1.24% for the three months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Average time deposits were $96.4$101.0 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2005, and $93.9$90.9 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2004, or an increase of 2.7%11.1%. It appears depositors are still cautious about locking inThe average rate paid on time deposits increased 55 basis points, to 2.59% from 2.04% for long-term certificates of deposit.the three monts ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The average balances for money market and savings accounts decreased $2.2$1.5 million, or 1.9%1.3%, to $109.3$110.7 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2005, from $111.4$112.2 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2004. The 12.9%An $8.9 million, or $5.8 million19.9%, increase in NOW accounts brought the average balance up to $50.6$53.8 million from $44.8$44.9 million. DuringThe period over period increase in NOW accounts reflects changes made earlier in 2005 to the first quarter of 2005, the bank subsidiary introduced a new suite ofCompany's deposit products and ancillary benefits for its deposit account holders.product offerings. During the second quarter of 2005, as part of thisthe new deposit product launch, some legacy account products that did not pay interest were converted to new deposit products that pay interest. The account conversions resulted in the transfer of over $6.0 million from demand deposits to interest bearing checking account (NOW's) products. The average balance of funds borrowed has decreasedincreased from $10.3$9.4 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2004, to $8.8$13.7 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2005, while the average rate paid on those funds rose from 3.48%3.63% to 4.52%4.58% between years. Noninterest Income. The Company's noninterest income increased $38$18 thousand, or 4.4%2.0%, to $908$900 thousand for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2005, from $870$882 thousand for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2004. Trust department income increased to $64$67 thousand for the three monthsthird quarter of 2005 from $47$57 thousand in the same period of 2004, or a 36.2%17.5% increase, primarily due to the increase in 17 the overall level of the stock market since the majority of the fee income is based on the market value of assets under management. Gain on sale of loans decreased between years to $23$48 thousand for the secondthird quarter of 2005 from $54$62 thousand for the same period in 2004 due to Management'smanagement's decision to lower the volume of loan sales ($3.23.9 million in 2005 versus $5.9$6.0 million in 2004) and the increasing costs of selling in the secondary market. Service fees (sources of which include, among others, deposit and loan servicing fees, ATM fees, and safe deposit fees) rose 5.0%5.3% between years increasing $35$38 thousand to $729$756 thousand for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2005, from $694$718 thousand for the three monthsthreemonths ended JuneSeptember 30, 2004. The main components of other income in both years are net servicing rights on loans sold and the increase in the cash surrender value of life insurance owned. 17 Noninterest Expense. The Company's noninterest expense increased $128$330 thousand, to $3.3$3.4 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2005, compared to $3.1$3.0 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2004. Salaries and wages increased $96$86 thousand, or 7.3%6.3%, to 1.4$1.4 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2005, from $1.3$1.4 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2004. This increase is due primarily to normal salary growth, and the addition of the St. Albans, Vermont loan production office in the fourth quarter of 2004. Pension and employee benefits decreased $9increased $89 thousand, or 1.7%21.8%, to $520$497 thousand for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2005, from $529$408 thousand for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2004. HealthThis increase was primarily due to increases in the accrual of estimated pension plan expenses of $33 thousand from $116 thousand in 2004 to $149 thousand in 2005. The third quarter accrual for 2004 was low due to an adjustment during the third quarter of 2004 to bring the year-to-date accrual into line with the actuarial estimate. There was also an increase of $36 thousand in health insurance coverage provided to eligible employees, which is self-insured by the Company up to certain individual and aggregate stop loss coverages and the experience during the second quarter of 2005 has been favorable.coverages. Net occupancy expense increased $9$16 thousand, or 4.8%9.2%, to $198$190 thousand for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2005, from $189$174 thousand for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2004, due mainly to the increased cost of maintenance, fuel, and utilities, and the opening of the St. Albans, Vermont loan center.production office. Equipment expense increased $23$27 thousand, or 10.4%10.8%, to $244$277 thousand for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2005, from $221$250 thousand for the same period in 2004, reflecting the increased depreciation and maintenance contract expense on new equipment. Other operating expenses were up $9$112 thousand, or 1.0%13.5%, to $907$944 thousand for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2005, compared to $898$832 thousand for the same period in 2004. They would have been up $33The increase in other noninterest expenses was primarily due to increases in professional fees, resulting mainly from $34 thousand more (orof expenses related to the Company's on going Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 compliance efforts, $16 thousand related to the Company's ATM's and debit card products, an $18 thousand increase in marketing expenses, $18 thousand in training expense for a totalcompany wide computer training program, $10 thousand in directors fees resulting from an increase in compensation rates for directors, and contributions of 4.7%) except for$20 thousand and $10 thousand to the impactcapital campaign of Union purchasingthe Northeastern Vermont State Franchise Tax Credits at 60% of their value whichRegional Hospital and the Company was able to utilize during the second quarter of 2005.Hurricane Katrina Relief Fund, respectively. Income Tax Expense. The Company's income tax expense increaseddecreased by $31$73 thousand, or 6.2%11.4%, to $532$568 thousand for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2005, from $501$641 thousand for the comparable period of 2004, mainly due to increased net taxable income. Year to Date Junefederal income tax credits received from investments in limited partnerships for affordable housing. Year-to-Date September 30, 2005, compared to Year to Date JuneYear-to-Date September 30, 2004. Interest and Dividend Income. The Company's interest and dividend income increased $719 thousand,$1.4 million, or 7.4%9.3%, to $10.5$16.3 million for the first sixnine months of 2005, from $9.8$14.9 million for the first sixnine months of 2004. This increase was due primarily to a $902 thousand,$1.6 million, or 10.4%12.3%, increase in interest and fees on loans, an $111 thousand increase in interest on federal funds sold, and a $30 thousand increase in interest on interest bearing deposits in banks, partially offset by a $228$377 thousand, or 24.6%, decrease in interest and dividend income from investment securities available-for-sale. The increase in loan related income is due to increases in loan portfolio balances from $267.0$269.0 million on average in 2004 to $280.5$285.0 million in 2005. The2005 and the increases in loan rates resultedresulting from increases in the prime lending rate over the last year. The decrease in investment income was due primarily to decreasing balances in the investment categories from $42.3$43.5 million in 2004 on average to $37.0$35.5 million on average in 2005 as cash flows from investments have been utilized to fund the growth in the loan portfolio. 18 Interest expense. The Company's interest expense increased $220$682 thousand, or 13.2%27.6%, to $1.9$3.2 million for the first sixnine months of 2005, from $1.7$2.5 million for the first sixnine months of 2004. This increase was due primarily to increases in interest rates paid on deposits, which increased 1628 basis points or 13.6%, to 1.34%1.46% from 1.18%. The year-to-dateYear-to-date average interest bearing deposit balances were essentially flat at $251.2deposits increased $6.6 million, or 2.6%, to $256.0 million for 2005, compared to $250.2$249.4 million for 2004. During the second quarter of 2005, as part of the new deposit product launch, some legacy account products that did not pay interest were converted to new deposit products that pay interest. The account conversion resulted in the transfer of over $6.0 million from demand deposits to interest bearing checking account (NOW's) products. Interest expense on borrowed funds increased $16$89 thousand, or 8.9%33.5%, which reflects the increase in the average rate on borrowings to 4.32%4.43% for the first sixnine months of 2005 compared to 3.57%3.59% for the same period in 2004, while year-to-dateand average balances decreased $905increased $831 thousand from $9.9$9.7 million infor the first nine months of 2004 to $9.0$10.6 million for the same period in 2005. Noninterest income: The Company's noninterest income decreased $39$21 thousand, or 2.2%0.8%, from $1.83$2.71 million for the first sixnine months of 2004 to $1.79$2.69 million for the first sixnine months of 2005. This decrease was due primarily to the decrease in net gains on sales of loans held for sale from $234$296 thousand in 2004 to $119$167 thousand in 2005 as interest rates have improved in 2005 and Union's management decided to retain higher rate loans instead of selling them to the secondary market. Union sold $9.7$13.6 million in residential real estate loans during the first halfnine months of 2005 versus $13.2$19.1 million during the same period in 2004. This decrease was partially offset by increases in trust income and servicing fees. Trust income increased $38$48 thousand, to $129$196 thousand from $91$148 thousand, or 41.8%32.4%, which was due primarily to the increase in fees charged and the increase in the overall level of the stock market since the majority of trust fee income is based on the market value of assets under management. Servicing fees (sources of which include, among others, deposit and loan servicing fees, ATM fees, and safe deposit fees) increased $47$85 thousand, 18 to $1.40$2.16 million from $1.36$2.07 million, or 3.5%4.1%. Noninterest expense: The Company's noninterest expense increased $133$463 thousand, or 2.1%5.0%, to $6.46$9.81 million for the first sixnine months of 2005 from $6.33$9.35 million for the first sixnine months of 2004. Salaries and wages increased $64$150 thousand or 2.4%3.7% to $2.79$4.23 million from $2.72$4.08 million with the increase primarily due to normal salary increases and the addition of the St. Albans, Vermont loan production office. Pension and employee benefits decreased $91 thousand, or 8.1%, to $1.04were essentially flat at $1.53 million from $1.13 million due primarily to a decrease in health insurance expense between years.2005 and 2004. Health insurance coverage provided to eligible employees is self-insured by the Company up to certain individual and aggregate stop loss coverages, and the experience during the first sixnine months of 2005 has been favorable. In addition pension plan expenses decreased $22only increased $11 thousand, or 7.1%2.6%, from $312$428 thousand to $290 thousand, due primarily to increases in the projected earnings on the assets in the pension plan due to increases in interest rates.$439 thousand. Net occupancy expenses increased $21$37 thousand, or 5.5%6.7%, to $402$592 thousand from $381$555 thousand, due primarily to increases in costs of fuel and utilities, and the opening of the St. Albans, Vermont loan center.production office. Equipment expenses increased $71$98 thousand, or 16.1%14.2%, to $512$789 thousand from $441$691 thousand, reflecting the increased depreciation and maintenance contract expense on new equipment, primarily an imaging reader sorter, ATM's, cars, generator, computer hardware and software, and upgraded telephone systems. Other operating expenses were up $68$180 thousand, or 4.1%7.2%, to $1.72$2.67 million from $1.66 million, as$2.49 million. As the Company continues its compliance efforts related to \ Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 implementation. And,implementation, it spent $37 thousand year to date on consultant fees. The Company hired a consultant to perform reviews and testing of the Company's information technology systems policies and procedures during 2005 and paid $24 thousand year-to-date for those services. In addition, Union introducedincurred product development, conversion and marketing costs in connection with the introduction of a new suite of deposit products and ancillary benefits for deposit account holders, beginning in March 2005. Also, the change during the second quarter of 2004 from paying for correspondent service charges by leaving deposits on balance to paying hard dollars increased year to date expense by $30$23 thousand. Contributions of $20 thousand and $10 thousand to the capital compaign of the Northeastern Vermont Regional Hospital and the Hurricane Katrina Relief Fund, respectively, were made. Other operating expenses would have been up $33 thousand more (or a total of 6.1%8.6%) except for the impact of Union purchasing Vermont State Franchise Tax Credits at 60% of their value which the Company was able to utilizeutilized during the second quarter of 2005. 19 Income Tax Expense: The Company's income tax expense increased $78$5 thousand, or 7.5%0.3%, to $1.11and was $1.68 million for the first sixnine months of 2005 compared to $1.04 million for the same period inand 2004. This increase was mainly due to increased net taxable income.income mostly offset by an increase in federal income tax credits received from investments in limited affordable housing partnerships. FINANCIAL CONDITION At JuneSeptember 30, 2005, the Company had total consolidated assets of $361.3$377.0 million, including net loans and loans held for sale ("net loans") of $289.2$294.0 million, deposits of $302.7$317.9 million and stockholders' equity of $41.1$41.5 million. The Company's total assets increased $ 1.8$17.5 million or 0.5%4.86% to $ 361.3$377.0 million at JuneSeptember 30, 2005, from $359.5 million at December 31, 2004, which is due to the increase in net loans and loans held for sale of $12.2$17.0 million, or 4.4%6.1%, the continuing management strategy of managing balance sheet growth by the sale of loans totaling $9.7$13.6 million during the first sixnine months of 2005, the management strategy of utilizing cash flows from securities available for sale to fund growth in the loan portfolio, and the effect of the $1.8 million special dividend paid to shareholders. June thirtieth of each year is our normal seasonal low point in terms of total assets,Net loans and deposits due to the majority of the municipalities having to be out of debt at least one day each fiscal year. Total net loans and loans held for sale increased $12.2were $294.0 million or 4.4% to $289.2 million or 80.0%78.0% of total assets at JuneSeptember 30, 2005, as compared to $277.0 million, or 77.0% of total assets at December 31, 2004. Cash and cash equivalents, including federal funds sold and overnight deposits, decreased $1.2 millionincreased $45 thousand or 5.6%0.2% to $19.9$21.2 million at JuneSeptember 30, 2005, from $21.1 million at December 31, 2004. Interest bearing deposits in banks increased $4.6 million or 60.9% as the Company used investments in certificates of deposit at other FDIC insured financial institutions to manage investment rates and maturities. Investment securities available-for-sale decreased from $41.0 million at December 31, 2004, to $31.7$34.9 million at JuneSeptember 30, 2005, a $9.3$6.0 million, or 22.6%14.7%, decrease. Securities maturing have not been replaced dollar for dollar in order to invest in FDIC insured interest bearing deposits and to fund loan demand anddemand. The decline in the balance of the investment portfolio also reflects management's decision to currently hold in portfolio a portion of loans held-for-sale. Deposits decreased $3.9increased $11.3 million, or 1.3%3.7%, to $302.7$317.9 million at JuneSeptember 30, 2005, from $306.6 million at December 31, 2004. Noninterest bearing accounts decreased $6.0 million, or 10.5%, from $57.2 million at December 31, 2004, which is partiallyto $51.2 million at September 30, 2005, due primarily to the launch of the new deposit account products in 2005 and a seasonal fluctuationresulting migration of deposit dollars to interest bearing deposit products. In addition, certificates of deposit increased $8.3 million or 9.0%, as depositors appear to be beginning to take advantage of increasing deposit rates. (See average balances and rates in the Yields Earned and Rates Paid tablestable on Pages 14 and 15) and partially a result of the ever increasing competition for deposit 19 dollars as both credit unions and brokers/financial advisors aggressively seek those same dollars.Page 16). Total borrowings increased $5.9$5.6 million to $13.8$13.5 million at JuneSeptember 30, 2005, from $7.9 million at December 31, 2004, as Union Bank ("Union") took down four amortizing advances to match fund four larger commercial real estate loans originated.originated during the second quarter. Total capital decreased from $42.4 million at December 31, 2004 to $41.1$41.5 million at JuneSeptember 30, 2005, reflecting net income of $2.83$4.32 million for the first sixnine months of 2005, less the regular and special dividends paid totaling approximately $4.0 million.$5.1 million and a reduction of $151 thousand in accumulated other comprehensive income. (see Capital Resources section on Page 30)31) Loans Held for Sale and Loan Portfolios. The Company's total loans (which includes loans held for sale and loan portfoliossale) primarily consists of adjustable-rate and fixed-rate mortgage loans secured by one-to-four family, multi-family residential or commercial real estate. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2005, the Company's grosstotal loan portfolio totaled $292.3was $297.2 million, or 80.9%,78.8% of assets, up from $280.2 million or 77.9% of assets as of December 31, 2004, and from $266.3$284.9 million or 77.4%79.1% of assets as of JuneSeptember 30, 2004. GrossTotal loans and loans held for sale have increased $12.1$17.0 million or 4.3%6.1% since December 31, 2004. The Company sold $3.2$3.9 million of loans held for sale during the secondthird quarter of 2005 resulting in a gain on sale of loans of $23$48 thousand for the quarter and sold $13.6 million year to date resulting in a gain of $167 thousand. 20 The following table shows information on the composition of the Company's gross loans held for sale and loan portfolio as of JuneSeptember 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004:
Loan Type JuneSeptember 30, 2005 December 31, 2004 - --------- ----------------------------------- ----------------- (dollars in thousands) Residential real estate $108,192 37.0%$112,388 37.8% $106,526 38.0% Construction real estate 19,912 6.8%18,743 6.3% 20,050 7.2% Commercial real estate 112,632 38.5%116,297 39.2% 111,497 39.8% Commercial 27,371 9.4%22,052 7.4% 19,979 7.1% Consumer 8,253 2.8%8,003 2.7% 8,729 3.1% Municipal loans 15,979 5.5%19,689 6.6% 13,454 4.8% -------- ----- -------- ----- Total loans 292,339297,172 100.0% 280,235 100.0% Deduct: Allowance for loan losses (3,022)(3,023) (3,067) Net deferred loan fees, premiums & discounts (156)(155) (166) -------- -------- $289,161$293,994 $277,002 ======== ========
The Company originates and sells some residential mortgages into the secondary market, with most such sales made to the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC) and the Vermont Housing Finance Agency (VHFA). Management expects to continue to use this strategy in an effort to protect the interest margin from the effect of making long-term loans in the low long-term interest rate environment which has continued throughout the secondthird quarter of 2005 despite the increases in the prime rate. The Company services an $183.4a $206.4 million residential real estate mortgage portfolio, approximately $79.8$80.4 million of which iswas serviced for unaffiliated third parties at JuneSeptember 30, 2005. Additionally, the Company originates commercial real estate and commercial loans under various SBA programs that provide an agency guarantee for a portion of the loan amount. The Company occasionally sells the guaranteed portion of the loan to other financial concerns and will retain servicing rights, which generates fee income. The Company serviced $5.3$4.4 million of commercial and commercial real estate loans for unaffiliated third parties as of JuneSeptember 30, 2005. The Company capitalizes servicing rights on these sales and recognizes gains and losses on the sale of the principal portion of these loans as they occur. The unamortized balance of servicing rights on loans sold with servicing retained was $328$322 thousand at JuneSeptember 30, 2005, with an estimated market value in excess of their carrying value. In the ordinary course of business, the Company occasionally participates out a portion of commercial/commercial real estate loans to other financial institutions for liquidity or credit concentration management purposes. The total of loans participated out as of JuneSeptember 30, 2005 was $7.0$7.4 million. 20 Asset Quality. The Company, like all financial institutions, is exposed to certain credit risks including those related to the value of the collateral that secures its loans and the ability of borrowers to repay their loans. Management closely monitors the Company's loan and investment portfolios and other real estate owned for potential problems on a periodic basis and reports to the Company's and the subsidiary's Boards of Directors at regularly scheduled meetings. The Company's loan review procedures include a credit quality assurance process that begins with approval of lending policies and underwriting guidelines by the Board of Directors, a loan review department supervised by an experienced former regulatory examiner, low individual lending limits for officers, Board approval for large credit relationships, and a quality control process for loan documentation that includes post-closing reviews. The Company also maintains a monitoring process for credit extensions. The Company performs periodic concentration analyses based on various factors such as industries, collateral types, large credit sizes, and officer portfolio loads. The Company has established underwriting guidelines to be followed by its officers. The Company monitors its delinquency levels for any negative or adverse trends. The Company continues to invest in its loan portfolio monitoring system to enhance its risk management capabilities. There can be no assurance, however, the Company's loan portfolio will not become subject to increasing pressures from deteriorating borrower credit due to general or local economic conditions. 21 By definition restructured loans may include troubled debt restructurings that involved forgiving a portion of interest or principal on a loan, refinancing loans at a rate materially less than the market rate, rescheduling loan payments, or granting other concessions to a borrower due to financial or economic reasons related to the debtor's financial difficulties that the Company would not otherwise consider. Restructured loans do not include qualifying restructured loans that have complied with the terms of their restructure agreement for a satisfactory period of time. The Company's restructured loans in compliance with modified terms totaled $21 thousand at JuneSeptember 30, 2005, compared to $656 thousand at December 31, 2004. There arewere four restructured loans with principal balances totaling $163$164 thousand that are not in compliance with the modified terms as of JuneSeptember 30, 2005. These four loans are in nonaccrual status. At December 31, 2004, there were three restructured loans at a value of $159 thousand that were not in compliance with the modified terms. The restructured loans at both JuneSeptember 30, 2005, and December 31, 20052004, were a result of rescheduling loan payments. At JuneSeptember 30, 2005, the Company was not committed to lend any additional funds to borrowers whose terms have been restructured. Loans on which the accrual of interest has been discontinued are designated as nonaccrual loans. Loans are designated as nonaccrual when reasonable doubt exists as to the full collection of interest and principal. Normally, when a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, all interest previously accrued but not collected is reversed against current period interest income. Income on such loans is then recognized only to the extent that cash is received and where the future collection of interest and principal is probable. Interest accruals are resumed on such loans only when they are brought fully current with respect to interest and principal and when, in the judgment of management, the loans are estimated to be fully collectible as to both principal and interest. The Company had loans on nonaccrual status totaling $1.2$1.3 million, or 0.41%0.45%, of gross loans at JuneSeptember 30, 2005, $1.2 million, or 0.43%, at December 31, 2004, and $1.7$1.6 million, or 0.65%0.57%, at JuneSeptember 30, 2004. The aggregate interest income not recognized on such nonaccrual loans amounted to approximately $232$249 thousand and $418$406 thousand as of JuneSeptember 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively and $338 thousand as of December 31, 2004. The Company had $4.0$2.2 million and $4.1 million in loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing at JuneSeptember 30, 2005, and December 31, 2004, respectively. The balance in loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest at both dates is primarily due to onethree commercial real estate loan relationshiprelationships that management is monitoring closely. The liquid assets and real estate collateralizing this loan relationship are sufficient in management's view to mitigate credit risk. At JuneSeptember 30, 2005, and December 31, 2004, respectively, the Company had internally classified certain loans totaling $642 thousand$2.6 million and $1.6 million. In management's view, such loans represent a higher degree of risk and could become nonperforming loans in the future. While still on a performing status, in accordance with the Company's credit policy, 21 loans are internally classified when a review indicates any of the following conditions makes the likelihood of collection uncertain: * the financial condition of the borrower is unsatisfactory; * repayment terms have not been met; * the borrower has sustained losses that are sizable, either in absolute terms or relative to net worth; * confidence is diminished; * loan covenants have been violated; * collateral is inadequate; or * other unfavorable factors are present. The difference between year end 2004 and September 30, 2005 is mainly due to one large commercial real estate relationship which while well collateralized is being monitored closely by management. This credit was past due 90 days or more at December 31, 2004, was current as of September 2005 and is presently 30 days past due. The credit is well collateralized with both real estate and marketable securities. 22 At JuneSeptember 30, 2005, the Company held real estate acquired by foreclosure or through repossession worth $279$244 thousand, which consisted of one property with open land as well as residential and commercial components, and a second residential real estate property.components. At December 31, 2004, the Company held one real estate property acquired by foreclosure worth $35 thousand. Allowance for Loan Losses. Some of the Company's loan customers ultimately do not make all of their contractually scheduled payments, requiring the Company to charge off a portion or all of the remaining principal balance due. The Company maintains an allowance for loan losses to absorb such losses. The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level which, in management's judgment, is adequate to absorb credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio; however, actual loan losses may vary from current estimates. The amount of the allowance is based on management's evaluation of the collectibility of the loan portfolio, including the composition of the portfolio, growth of the portfolio, credit concentrations, trends in historical loss experience, delinquency and past due trends, specific impaired loans, and economic conditions. Allowances for impaired loans are generally determined based on collateral values or the present value of estimated cash flows. The allowance is increased by a provision for loan losses, which is charged to expense and reduced by charge-offs, net of recoveries on loans previously charged off. The provision for loan losses represents the current period credit cost associated with maintaining an appropriate allowance for loan losses. While the Company allocates the allowance for loan losses based on the percentage category to total loans, the portion of the allowance for loan losses allocated to each category does not represent the total available for future losses which may occur within the loan category since the total allowance for possible loan losses is a valuation reserve applicable to the entire portfolio. Based on an evaluation of the loan portfolio, management presents a quarterly analysis of the allowance for loan losses to the Board of Directors, indicating any changes in the allowance since the last review and any recommendations as to adjustments in the allowance. For the quarter ended JuneSeptember 30, 2005, the methodology used to determine the provision for loan losses was unchanged from the prior year. The composition of the Company's loan portfolio remained relatively unchanged from December 31, 2004, and there was no material change in the lending programs or terms during the quarter. 22 The following table reflects activity in the allowance for loan losses for the three and nine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2005 and 2004:
Three Months Ended, June 30, SixNine Months Ended, JuneSeptember 30, ---------------------------- -------------------------September 30, ------------------- ------------------ 2005 2004 2005 2004 ---- ---- ---- ---- (dollars in thousands) Balance at beginning of period $3,068 $3,019$3,022 $3,023 $3,067 $3,029 Charge-offs: Real Estate 25 8- 3 28 3437 Commercial 6 13 -19 13 - Consumer and other 17 1 35 5 20 40 25 ------ ------ ------ ------ Total charge-offs 55 9 76 3911 36 87 75 ------ ------ ------ ------ Recoveries: Real Estate 1 - - 1213 - Commercial 1 2 1 566 3 71 Consumer and other 8 11 18 289 10 27 38 ------ ------ ------ ------ Total recoveries 9 13 31 3312 76 43 109 ------ ------ ------ ------ Net recoveries (charge-offs) (46) 4 (45) (6)1 40 (44) 34 ------ ------ ------ ------ Provision for loan losses - 30 - - -30 ------ ------ ------ ------ Balance at end of period $3,022 $3,023 $3,022$3,093 $3,023 $3,093 ====== ====== ====== ======
23 The following table shows the breakdown of the Company's allowance for loan losses by category of loan (net of loans held for sale) and the percentage of loans in each category to total loans in the respective portfolios at the dates indicated.indicated:
JuneSeptember 30, December 31, 2005 2004 ----------------- ----------------- (dollars in thousands) Amount Percent Amount Percent ------ ------- ------ ------- Real Estate Residential $ 518 31.6%550 32.2% $ 553 32.8% Commercial 1,570 41.8%1,729 42.5% 1,733 42.5% Construction 199 7.0%187 6.5% 199 7.3% Home equity loans 3435 1.6% 32 1.6% Other Loans Commercial 514 9.6%360 7.6% 349 7.5% Consumer installment 126 2.9%2.8% 138 3.3% Municipal, Other and Unallocated 61 5.6%36 6.8% 63 5.0% ------ ----- ------ ----- Total $3,022$3,023 100.0% $3,067 100.0% ====== ===== ====== ===== Ratio of Net Charge Offs to Average Loans not held for sale (1) 0.03%0.02% 0.00% ===== ========= ==== Ratio of Allowance for Loan Losses to Loans not held for sale 1.10%1.02% 1.13% ===== ========= ==== Annualized
Management of the Company believes that the allowance for loan losses at JuneSeptember 30, 2005, is adequate to cover losses inherent in the Company's loan portfolio as of such date. However there can be no assurance that the Company will not sustain losses in future periods, which could be greater than the size of the allowance for loan losses at JuneSeptember 30, 2005. See CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES. 23 While the Company recognizes that any economic slowdown may adversely impact its borrowers' financial performance and ultimately their ability to repay their loans, management continues to be cautiously optimistic about the key credit indicators from the Company's loan portfolio. Investment Activities. At JuneSeptember 30, 2005, the reported value of investment securities available-for-sale was $31.7$34.9 million or 8.8%9.3% of its assets. The Company had no securities classified as held-to-maturity or trading. The reported value of investment securities available-for-sale at JuneSeptember 30, 2005, reflects a positive valuation adjustment of $317$342 thousand. The offset of this adjustment, net of income tax effect, was $209$226 thousand reflected in the Company's other comprehensive income component of stockholders' equity.equity at September 30, 2005. The amount in investmentInvestment securities available-for-sale has decreased from $41.0 million at December 31, 2004, to $31.7$34.9 million at JuneSeptember 30, 2005, as loan demand has remained strong and securities maturing, called or paying down have not been replaced.replaced dollar for dollar. Union also sold $2 million of securities year to date to clean up small remaining balances on mortgage backed securities. At December 31, 2004, the Company had only one adjustable rate mortgage backed security with a fair value of $29 thousand with an unrealized loss of less than $1 thousand that had existed for more than 12 months. That security was sold along with the small remaining balances of nine other mortgage backed securities in May of 2005 for a net gain on the 10 securities of $1 thousand. At JuneSeptember 30, 2005, twenty-onetwenty-two securities with a fair value of $9.1$8.8 million or 28.7%25.2% of the portfolio have been in a loss position for more than twelve months with unrealized losses totaling $119$160 thousand. The primary factor causing these unrealized losses is the change in the interest rate environment over the 24 past year especially in the near-term market. Management deems the unrealized losses on all these securities to be temporary since there are no credit quality issues and the Company has the ability to hold these securities, classified as available-for-sale, for the foreseeable future. Deposits. The following table shows information concerning the Company's average deposits by account type, and the weighted average nominal rates at which interest was paid on such deposits for the periods ending JuneSeptember 30, 2005, and December 31, 2004:
SixNine Months Ended, JuneSeptember 30, Year Ended December 31, 2005 2004 -------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------- (dollars in thousands) Percent Percent Average Of Total Average Average of Total Average Amount Deposits Rate Amount Deposits Rate --------------- -------- ------- --------------- -------- ------- Non-time deposits: Demand deposits $ 50,050 16.6%49,526 16.2% $ 49,638 16.6% NOW accounts 47,906 15.9% 0.48%49,903 16.3% 0.49% 45,619 15.2% 0.41% Money Markets 60,710 20.2% 1.31%59,590 19.5% 1.46% 64,668 21.6% 0.87% Savings 49,146 16.3% 0.57%50,543 16.6% 0.70% 47,225 15.7% 0.58% -------- ----- -------- ----- Total non-time deposits: 207,812 69.0%209,562 68.6% 207,150 69.1% -------- ----- -------- ----- Time deposits: Less than $100,000 62,788 20.8% 2.07%62,345 20.4% 2.13% 65,663 21.9% 2.00% $100,000 and over 30,607 10.2% 2.60%33,610 11.0% 2.78% 26,993 9.0% 2.28% -------- ----- -------- ----- Total time deposits 93,395 31.0%95,955 31.4% 92,656 30.9% -------- ----- -------- ----- Total deposits $301,207$305,517 100.0% 1.13%1.22% $299,806 100.0% 0.98% ======== ===== ==== ======== ===== ====
24 The following table sets forth information regarding the amounts of the Company's time deposits in amounts of $100,000 or more at JuneSeptember 30, 2005, and December 31, 2004, that mature during the periods indicated:
JuneSeptember 30, 2005 December 31, 2004 ------------------------------- ----------------- (dollars in thousands) Within 3 months $15,987$16,052 $ 8,149 3 to 6 months 6,5363,637 11,717 6 to 12 months 3,52918,423 6,298 Over 12 months 2,7522,883 3,160 ------- ------- $28,804$40,995 $29,324 ======= =======
The increase in total time deposits over $100,000 between periods is mainly due to the local municipal deposits resulting from concentrated efforts to develop that market and the deposits received for funding of the construction of a local elementary school. The near term maturity of these municipal deposits is tied to their fiscal year and state funding requirements and is consistent year to year. Borrowings. Borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (FHLB) were $13.8$13.5 million at JuneSeptember 30, 2005, at a weighted average rate of 4.54%. Borrowings from the FHLB of Boston were $7.9 million at December 31, 2004, at a weighted average rate of 4.09%. The change between year end 2004 and the end of the secondthird quarter of 2005 is a net increase of $5.9$5.6 million which was comprised of borrowing $7.9 million in long term amortizing advances to match fund new loans offset by $500$800 thousand in continuing paydowns on existing long-term amortizing advances and a $1.5 million payoff of a short-term liquidity advance. 25 OTHER FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS Market Risk and Asset and Liability Management. Market risk is the potential of loss in a financial instrument arising from adverse changes in market prices, interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, and equity prices. The Company's market risk arises primarily from interest rate risk inherent in its lending, investing and deposit taking activities as yields on assets change in a different time period or in a different amount from that of interest costs on liabilities. Many other factors also affect the Company's exposure to changes in interest rates, such as general and local economic and financial conditions, competitive pressures, customer preferences, and historical pricing relationships. The earnings of the Company and its subsidiary are affected not only by general economic conditions, but also by the monetary and fiscal policies of the United States and its agencies, particularly the Federal Reserve System. The monetary policies of the Federal Reserve System influence to a significant extent the overall growth of loans, investments and deposits; the level of interest rates earned on assets and paid for liabilities; and interest rates charged on loans and paid on deposits. The nature and impact of future changes in monetary policies are often not predictable. A key element in the process of managing market risk involves direct involvement by senior management and oversight by the Board of Directors as to the level of risk assumed by the Company in its balance sheet. The Board of Directors reviews and approves risk management policies, including risk limits and guidelines and reviews quarterly the current position in relationship to those limits and guidelines. Daily oversight functions are delegated to the Asset Liability Management Committee ("ALCO"). The ALCO, consisting of senior business and finance officers, actively measures, monitors, controls and manages the interest rate risk exposure that can significantly impact the Company's financial position and operating results. The Company does not have any market risk sensitive instruments acquired for trading purposes. The Company attempts to structure its balance sheet to maximize net interest income and shareholder value while controlling its exposure to interest rate risk. The ALCO formulates strategies to manage interest rate risk by evaluating the impact on earnings and capital of such factors as current interest rate forecasts and economic indicators, potential changes in such forecasts and indicators, liquidity, and various business strategies. The ALCO's methods for evaluating interest rate risk include an analysis of the Company's interest-rate sensitivity "gap", which provides a static analysis of the maturity and repricing characteristics of the Company's entire balance sheet, and a simulation analysis, which calculates projected net interest income based on alternative balance sheet and interest rate scenarios, including "rate shock" scenarios involving immediate substantial increases or decreases in market rates of interest. 25 The Company's ALCO meets weekly to set loan and deposit rates, make investment decisions, monitor liquidity and evaluate the loan demand pipeline. Deposit runoff is monitored daily and loan prepayments evaluated monthly. The Company historically has maintained a substantial portion of its loan portfolio on a variable rate basis and plans to continue this Asset/Liability Management (ALM) strategy in the future. Portions of the variable rate loan portfolio have interest rate floors and caps which are taken into account by the Company's ALM modeling software to predict interest rate sensitivity, including prepayment risk. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2005, the investment portfolio was all classified as available-for-sale and the modified duration was relatively short. The Company does not utilize any derivative products or invest in any "high risk" instruments. The Company's interest rate sensitivity analysis (simulation) as of December 2004 for a 75150 basis point increase in the rate environment in 25 basis point increments (prime(Prime at December 31, 2004, was 5.25% and was 6.25%6.75% on JuneSeptember 30, 2005 but the 25 basis point move happened on the thirtieth of June so there would have been no impact until the July 2005), projected the following for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2005, compared to the actual results of:results: 26
JuneSeptember 30, 2005 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Percentage Projected Actual Difference --------- ------ ---------- (dollars in thousands) Net Interest Income $9,034 $8,607 (4.73)%$14,026 $13,121 (6.5%) Net Income $2,957 $2,828 (4.36)%$ 4,764 $ 4,322 (9.3%) Return on Assets 1.68%1.77% 1.60% (4.76)%(9.6%) Return on Equity 14.19% 13.89% (2.11)%14.91% 14.12% (5.3%)
One of the reasons for the actual results being lower than projected is that the simulation model assumed the six 25 basis point increases in prime would happen on the first of each month February and March 1st,through July, respectively while they actually happened on February 2nd, March 22nd, May 3rd, June 30th August 9th and May 3rd.September 20th. Another reason for the lower actual results is a flattening of the yield curve over the last nine months which was not built into the model assumptions in December of 2004. Commitments, Contingent Liabilities, and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers and to reduce its own exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit, interest rate caps and floors written on adjustable rate loans, commitments to participate in or sell loans and commitments to buy or sell securities. Such instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheet. The contract or notional amounts of these instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Company has in particular classes of financial instruments. The Company generally requires collateral or other security to support financial instruments with credit risk. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2005, and December 31, 2004, the contract or notional amount of financial instruments whose contract or notional amount represents credit risk was as follows:
JuneSeptember 30, 2005 December 31, 2004 ------------------------------- ----------------- (dollars in thousands) Commitments to originate loans $16,402$24,189 $13,773 Unused lines of credit 26,70130,592 31,908 Standby letters of credit 826885 1,004 Credit Card arrangements 2,2852,298 2,273 Equity investment commitments to housing limited partnerships 453748 1,349 ------- ------- Total $46,671$58,712 $50,307 ======= =======
26The increase in commitments to originate loans was influenced in part by strong loan demand in the Company's market, and continued consolidation in the banking industry, which has given Union Bank the opportunity to establish relationships with customers that choose to do business with community banks. Commitments to originate loans are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the loan commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon and not all credit lines will be utilized, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. 27 The Company's contractual obligations at JuneSeptember 30, 2005, and December 31, 2004, were as follows:
JuneSeptember 30, 2005 December 31, 2004 ------------------------------- ----------------- (dollars in thousands) Operating lease commitments $ 297267 $ 329 Maturities on borrowed funds 13,80313,539 7,933 Deposits without stated maturity (1) 211,365217,420 214,402 Certificates of deposit (1) 91,317100,486 92,196 Pension plan contributions (2) 402356 475 Deferred compensation payouts 736729 927 Construction contract (3) 597 - Equity investment commitments in housing limited partnerships 748 - -------- -------- Total $318,668$334,142 $316,262 ======== ======== - -------------------- While the Company has a contractual obligation to depositors should they wish to withdraw all or some of the funds on deposit with the Bank subsidiary, management believes, based on historical analysis, that the majority of these deposits will remain on deposit for the foreseeable future. The amounts exclude interest accrued. Funding requirements for pension benefits after 2005 are excluded due to the significant variability in the assumptions required to project the amount and timing of future cash contributions. Contract to construct a new branch in Littleton, New Hampshire.
The Company's subsidiary is also required to maintain cash on hand or balances in a noninterest-bearing reserve balance byaccount at the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston which was $413 thousand at September 30, 2005, and $6.3 million at December 31, 2004. Beginning on July 26, 2005, Union began reclassifying transaction deposit accounts that meet certain criteria to savings accounts, in accordance with Federal Reserve banking regulations, for the purpose of reporting deposits subject to reserves to the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. The requiredThis reclassification has reduced Union's daily reserve has not materially changed since December 31, 2004.requirement by approximately $4 million. Interest Rate Sensitivity "Gap" Analysis. An interest rate sensitivity "gap" is defined as the difference between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities maturing or repricing within a given time period. A gap is considered positive when the amount of interest rate sensitive assets exceeds the amount of interest rate sensitive liabilities. A gap is considered negative when the amount of interest rate sensitive liabilities exceeds the amount of interest rate sensitive assets. During a period of rising interest rates, a negative gap would tend to adversely affect net interest income, while a positive gap would tend to result in an increase in net interest income. During a period of falling interest rates, a negative gap would tend to result in an increase in net interest income, while a positive gap would tend to affect net interest income adversely. Because different types of assets and liabilities with the same or similar maturities may react differently to changes in overall market interest rates or conditions, changes in interest rates may affect net interest income positively or negatively even if an institution were perfectly matched in each maturity category. The Company prepares its interest rate sensitivity "gap" analysis by scheduling interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities into periods based upon the next date on which such assets and liabilities could mature or reprice. The amounts of assets and liabilities shown within a particular period were determined in accordance with the contractual terms of the assets and liabilities, except that: * adjustable-rate loans, investment securities, variable rate time deposits, and FHLB advances are included in the period when they are first scheduled to adjust and not in the period in which they mature; * fixed-rate mortgage-related securities, loans and borrowed funds reflect estimated prepayments, which were estimated based on analyses of broker estimates, the results of a prepayment model utilized by the Company, and empirical data; and 2728 * NOW, money markets, and savings deposits, which do not have contractual maturities, reflect estimated levels of attrition, which are based on detailed studies by the Company of the sensitivity of each such category of deposit to changes in interest rates. Management believes that these assumptions approximate actual experience and considers them reasonable. However, the interest rate sensitivity of the Company's assets and liabilities in the tables could vary substantially if different assumptions were used or actual experience differs from the historical experience on which the assumptions are based. The following table shows the Company's rate sensitivity analysis as of JuneSeptember 30, 2005:
JuneSeptember 30, 2005 Cumulative repriced within ------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Months 4 to 12 1 to 3 3 to 5 Over 5 or Less Months Years Years 5 Years Total -------- ------- ------ ------ ------------- ----- (dollars in thousands, by repricing date) Interest sensitive assets: Federal funds sold and overnight deposits $ 3,948 - - -8,628 $ - $ 3,948- $ - $ - $ 8,628 Interest bearing deposits in banks 199 2,170 2,8623,877 2,686 4,435 885 99 6,215 Investments196 12,079 Investment securities available-for- saleavailable-for-sale (1) 2,355 4,845 9,218 7,362 6,692 30,4724,583 3,574 12,675 5,998 6,770 33,600 FHLB Stock - - - - 1,241 1,241 Loans and loans held for sale (2) 116,971 67,705 62,162 30,868 14,477 292,183118,898 65,457 63,595 34,816 14,251 297,017 -------- ------- -------- -------- ----------------- -------- Total interest sensitive assets $123,473 $74,720$135,986 $71,717 $ 74,24280,705 $ 39,11541,699 $ 22,509 $334,059 ======== ======= ======== ======== ========= ========22,458 $352,565 Interest sensitive liabilities: Time deposits $ 32,444 $36,39326,473 $51,652 $ 20,01919,742 $ 2,4612,618 $ - $ 91,317$100,485 Money markets 11,54813,617 - - - 46,508 58,05644,314 57,931 Regular savings 11,14614,410 - - - 42,999 54,14538,437 52,847 NOW accounts 22,63432,046 - - - 30,587 53,22123,407 55,453 Borrowed funds 273 2,431 3,701 1,414 5,984 13,803283 2,345 3,847 1,496 5,568 13,539 -------- ------- -------- -------- ----------------- -------- Total interest sensitive liabilities $ 78,045 $38,82486,829 $53,997 $ 23,72023,589 $ 3,875 $ 126,078 270,542 ======== ======= ======== ======== ========= ========4,114 $111,726 $280,255 Net interest rate sensitivity gap $ 45,428 $35,89649,157 $17,720 $ 50,52257,116 $ 35,240 $(103,569) $ 63,51737,585 ($89,268) $72,310 Cumulative net interest rate sensitivity gap $ 45,428 $81,324 $131,846 $167,08649,157 $66,877 $123,993 $161,578 $ 63,51772,310 Cumulative net interest rate sensitivity gap as a percentage of total assets 12.6% 22.5% 36.5% 46.2% 17.6%13.0% 17.7% 32.9% 42.9% 19.2% Cumulative net interest rate sensitivity gap as a percentage of total interest-sensitive assets 13.6% 24.3% 39.5% 50.0%13.9% 19.0% 35.2% 45.8% 20.5% Cumulative net interest rate sensitivity gap as a percentage of total interest-sensitive liabilities 16.8% 30.1% 48.7% 61.8% 23.5%17.5% 23.9% 44.2% 57.7% 25.8% Investment securities available-for-sale exclude marketable equity securities with a fair value of $1.2$1.3 million that may be sold by the Company at any time. Balances shown net of unearned income of $156$155 thousand.
2829 Simulation Analysis. In its simulation analysis, the Company uses computer software to simulate the estimated impact on net interest income and capital (Net Fair Value) under various interest rate scenarios, balance sheet trends, and strategies over a relatively short time horizon. These simulations incorporate assumptions about balance sheet dynamics such as loan and deposit growth, product pricing, prepayment speeds on mortgage related assets and principal maturities on other financial instruments, and changes in funding mix. While such assumptions are inherently uncertain as actual rate changes rarely follow any given forecast and asset-liability pricing and other model inputs usually do not remain constant in their historical relationships, management believes that these assumptions are reasonable. Based on the results of these simulations, the Company is able to quantify its estimate of interest rate risk and develop and implement appropriate strategies. The following chart reflects the cumulative results of the latest simulation analysis for the next twelve months on Net Interest Income, Net Income, Return on Assets, Return on Equity and Net Fair Value Ratio. The projection utilizes a rate shock of up 300 basis points and down 200300 basis points from the current prime rate of 6.25%6.75%, this risethat is applied proportionately, these are the highest internal slope monitored andmonitored. Since interest rates paid on interest bearing deposits have not risen as quickly as rates earned on interest earning assets, a rate shock of down 200 or 300 basis points was chosen as withwill only bring the current relatively low level of interest rates on those lower rate deposits down to a floor rate which has been set by the potential for interest- bearing deposit accounts to respond to further drops in projected rates is limited, therefore calculations for rate decreases greater than 200 basis points could have been misleading.Company. This slope range was determined to be the most relevant during this economic cycle. UNION BANKSHARES, INC. INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS MATRIX JUNESEPTEMBER 30, 2005 (in thousands) - -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return Return on on Net Fair 12 Months Prime Net Interest Change Net Assets Equity Value Ending Rate Income % Income % % Ratio - --------- ----- ------------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -------- June-06 9.25% $21,223 16.82 $7,841 2.20 18.54 17.12 6.25% 18,166 0.00 5,765 1.54 13.35 17.37 4.25 16,050 (11.65) 4,328 1.07 9.51 17.22September-06 9.75% $21,730 16.3 $8,187 2.22 19.43 9.28% 6.75% $18,681 - $6,094 1.61 14.40 11.01% 3.75% $15,520 (16.9) $3,924 0.96 8.86 12.77%
The resulting projected cumulative effect of these estimates on Net Interest Income and the Net Fair Value Ratio for the twelve month period ending JuneSeptember 30, 2006, are within the approved ALCO guidelines. The simulations of earnings do not incorporate any management actions, which might moderate the negative consequences of interest rate deviations. Therefore, they do not reflect likely actual results, but serve as conservative estimates of interest rate risk. Liquidity. Managing liquidity risk is essential to maintaining both depositor confidence and stability in earnings. Liquidity is a measurement of the Company's ability to meet potential cash requirements, including ongoing commitments to fund deposit withdrawals, repay borrowings, fund investment and lending activities, and for other general business purposes. The Company's principal sources of funds are deposits, amortization and prepayment of loans and securities, maturities of investment securities and other short-term investments, sales of securities and loans available-for- sale, earnings and funds provided from operations. Maintaining a relatively stable funding base, which is achieved by diversifying funding sources, competitively pricing deposit products, and extending the contractual maturity of liabilities, reduces the Company's exposure to roll overrollover risk on deposits and limits reliance on volatile short-term purchased funds. Short-term funding needs arise from declines in deposits or other funding sources, funding of loan commitments, draws on unused lines of credit and requests for new loans. The Company's strategy is to fund assets, to the maximum extent possible, with core deposits that provide a 29 sizable source of relatively stable and low-cost funds. For the quarter ended, JuneSeptember 30, 2005, the Company's ratio of average loans to average deposits was 94.0%94.3% compared to the prior year of 90.6%91.3%. The increase in the loan to deposit ratio between years was mainly funded by the decrease in Investment Securitiesinvestment 30 securities available-for-sale and Due From Banks.cash and due from banks as well as Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) of Boston advances. In addition, as Union Bank is a member of the FHLBFederal Home Loan Bank of Boston, it has access to unused pre-approved lines of credit of $3.8$4.1 million or 1.1% of total assets. Union Bank maintains a $5 million pre-approvedpre- approved Federal Fund line of credit with an upstream correspondent bank and a repurchase agreement line with a selected brokerage house, there were no balances outstanding on either line at JuneSeptember 30, 2005. While scheduled loan and securities payments and FHLB advances are relatively predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and prepayments on loans and mortgage-backed securities are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions, and competition. The Company's liquidity is actively managed on a daily basis, monitored by the ALCO, and reviewed periodically with the subsidiary's Board of Directors. The Company's ALCO sets liquidity targets based on the Company's financial condition and existing and projected economic and market conditions. The ALCO measures the Company's marketable assets and credit facilities available to fund liquidity requirements and compares the adequacy of that aggregate amount against the aggregate amount of the Company's interest sensitive or volatile liabilities, such as core deposits and time deposits in excess of $100,000, borrowings and term deposits with short maturities, and credit commitments outstanding. The primary objective is to manage the Company's liquidity position and funding sources in order to ensure that it has the ability to meet its ongoing commitment to its depositors, to fund loan commitments and unused lines of credit, and to maintain a portfolio of investment securities. The Company's management monitors current and projected cash flows and adjusts positions as necessary to maintain adequate levels of liquidity. Although approximately 74.7%76.7% of the Company's time deposits will mature within twelve months, management believes, based upon past experience, the relationships developed with local municipalities, and the introduction of new deposit products in 2005, that Union Bank will retain a substantial portion of these deposits. Management will continue to offer a competitive but prudent pricing strategy to facilitate retention of such deposits. Any reduction in total deposits could be offset by purchases of federal funds, short-term FHLB of Boston borrowings, utilization of the repurchase agreement line, or liquidation of investment securities, purchased brokerage certificates of deposit, or loans available-for-sale. Such steps could result in an increase in the Company's cost of funds and adversely impact the net interest spread and margin. Management believes the Company has sufficient liquidity to meet all reasonable borrower, depositor, and creditor needs in the present economic environment. However, any projections of future cash needs and flows are subject to substantial uncertainty. WeManagement continually evaluateevaluates opportunities to buy/sell securities and loans available-for-sale, obtain credit facilities from lenders, or restructure our debt for strategic reasons or to further strengthen our financial position. Capital Resources. Capital management is designed to maintain an optimum level of capital in a cost-effective structure that meets target regulatory ratios; supports the internal assessment of economic capital; funds the Company's business strategies; and builds long-term stockholder value. The total dollar value of the Company's stockholders' equity was $41.1$41.5 million at JuneSeptember 30, 2005, reflecting net income of $2.8$4.3 million for the first sixnine months of 2005, less cash dividends paid of $4.0$5.1 million, and a reduction of $168$151 thousand in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Incomeaccumulated other comprehensive income compared to $42.4 million at year end 2004. The reduction in the capital between December 31, 2004, and JuneSeptember 30, 2005, was primarily a result of the special dividend of $0.40 per share that was paid in January 2005 totaling $1.8 million, which was in addition to the regular dividends of $0.24, or $1.1 million each, that were paid in January, April, and AprilJuly of 2005. The special dividend was declared as the Company's primary capital ratio on December 31, 2004, approached 12%, 2004 earnings were better than anticipated, and the current tax treatment of dividends is beneficial to shareholders. Union Bankshares, Inc. has 5 million shares of $2.00 par value common stock authorized. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2005, the Company had 4,915,611 shares issued, of which 4,554,663 were outstanding and 360,948 were held in Treasury. 31 As of JuneSeptember 30, 2005, there were outstanding employee incentive stock options with respect to 12,575 shares of the Company's common stock, granted pursuant to Union Bankshare's 1998 Incentive Stock 30 Option Plan. All theAs of such date all outstanding options outstanding arewere currently exercisable but only 6,325 of those shares arewere "in the money". Of the 75,000 shares authorized for issuance under the 1998 Plan, 51,950 shares remain available for future option grants. During the secondthird quarter of 2005, no incentive stock options granted pursuant to the 1998 plan were exercised.exercised, but 3,000 shares have been exercised so far in the fourth quarter of 2005. Union Bankshares, Inc. and Union Bank Inc. are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Management believes, as of JuneSeptember 30, 2005, that both companies meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2005, the most recent calculation categorizes Union Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. The prompt corrective action capital category framework applies to FDIC insured depository institutions such as Union but does not apply directly to bank holding companies such as the Company. To be categorized as well capitalized, Union Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier I risk-based, and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the table below. There are no conditions or events since JuneSeptember 30, 2005, that management believes have changed either companies'company's category. Union Bank's and the Company's actual capital amounts and ratios as of JuneSeptember 30, 2005, are presented in the table:
Minimums To Be Well Minimums Capitalized Under For Capital Prompt Corrective Actual Requirements Action Provisions ---------------- ---------------- ----------------- Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio ------ ----- ------ ----- ------ ----- (dollars in thousands) Total capital to risk weighted assets Union Bank $43,663 17.6% $19,847$44,101 17.2% $20,498 8.0% $11,277$25,622 10.0% Company 44,040 17.7% 19,905$44,489 17.3% $20,544 8.0% N/A N/A Tier I capital to risk weighted assets Union Bank $40,468 16.3% $ 9,931$40,857 15.9% $10,249 4.0% $14,896$15,373 6.0% Company 40,845 16.4% 9,962$41.245 16.1% $10,272 4.0% N/A N/A Tier I capital to average assets Union Bank $40,468 11.4% $14,199$40,857 11.0% $14,877 4.0% $17,749$18,596 5.0% Company 40,845 11.5% 14,207$41,245 11.1% $14,911 4.0% N/A N/A
Regulatory Matters. The Company and its subsidiary bankUnion are subject to periodic examinations by the various regulatory agencies. These examinations include, but are not limited to, procedures designed to review lending practices, risk management, credit quality, liquidity, compliance and capital adequacy. During 2004 the Vermont State Department of Banking, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston performed various examinations of the Company and Union pursuant to their regular, periodic regulatory reviews. No comments were received from these various bodies that would have a material adverse effect on eitherthe Company's or Union's liquidity, capital resources, or operations. Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. Information called for by this item is incorporated by reference in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under the caption "OTHER FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS" on pages 2526 through 3132 in this Form 10-Q. 3132 Item 4. Controls and Procedures. The Company's chief executive officer and chief financial officer evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the report date and concluded that those disclosure controls and procedures are effective in alerting them in a timely manner to material information about the Company and its consolidated subsidiary required to be disclosed in the Company's periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. There have been no changes in the Company's internal controls or in other factors known to the Company that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to their evaluation. While the Company believes that its existing disclosure controls and procedures have been effective to accomplish these objectives, the Company intends to continue to examine, refine and formalize its disclosure controls and procedures and to monitor ongoing developments in this area. PART II OTHER INFORMATION Item 1. Legal Proceedings. There are no known pending legal proceedings to which the Company or its subsidiary is a party, or to which any of their properties is subject, other than ordinary litigation arising in the normal course of business activities. Although the amount of any ultimate liability with respect to such proceedings cannot be determined, in the opinion of management, any such liability will not have a material effect on the consolidated financial position of the Company and its subsidiary. Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. The Company held its annual meeting of shareholders on May 18, 2005. Of 4,554,663 shares outstanding on the record date of the meeting (April 1, 2005), 3,818,008 shares were represented in person or by proxy. The only matter voted on by the shareholders at the meeting was to fix the number of directors at eight and to elect the following individuals as directors for the ensuing year. The Board of Directors nominated businessman and former bank executive Steven J. Bourgeois to fill the vacancy created by the retirement of William T. Costa, Jr. who had reached the mandatory retirement age.
Votes Votes Votes Broker Nominees For Withheld Abstained Non-votes ----- -------- --------- --------- Cynthia D. Borck 3,815,889 600 1,519 - Steven J. Bourgeois 3,807,739 8,750 1,519 - Kenneth D. Gibbons 3,807,439 9,050 1,519 - Franklin G. Hovey, II 3,815,564 925 1,519 - Richard C. Marron 3,812,889 3,600 1,519 - Robert P. Rollins 3,813,111 3,378 1,519 - Richard C. Sargent 3,804,736 11,753 1,519 - John H. Steel 3,816,489 - 1,519 -
32 Item 6. Exhibits. 31.1 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 31.2 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 32.1 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 32.2 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. AugustNovember 11, 2005 Union Bankshares, Inc. /s/ Kenneth D. Gibbons ----------------------------------------------------------- Kenneth D. Gibbons Director, President and Chief Executive Officer /s/ Marsha A. Mongeon ---------------------------------------------------------- Marsha A. Mongeon Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) 33 EXHIBIT INDEX 31.1 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 31.2 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 32.1 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 32.2 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 33 34