QuickLinks-- Click hereUse these links to rapidly navigate through thisreview the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)


ý

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended JuneSeptember 30, 2002

OR

oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transitiontransition period from                            to                            

Commission File No.Number: 333-76055


UNITED INDUSTRIES CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE

(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 43-1025604

(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

8825 Page Boulevard
St. Louis, Missouri 63114

(Address of principal executive office, including zip code)

(314) 427-0780
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

8825 Page Boulevard
St. Louis, Missouri 63114
(Address of principal executive office, including zip code)
(314) 427-0780
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý    No o.

        As of July 31,November 12, 2002, the Registrantregistrant had 33,143,000 Class A voting and 33,143,000 Class B non-voting shares of common stock outstanding and 37,600 Class A non-voting shares of Class A preferred stock outstanding.




UNITED INDUSTRIES CORPORATION
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002

TABLE OF CONTENTS


Page No.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements—United Industries Corporation and Subsidiaries



Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2002 and 2001, and December 31, 2001


4

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001


5

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001


6

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


7

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations


19

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk


34

Item 4. Controls and Procedures


35

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION



Item 1. Legal Proceedings


36

Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds


36

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K


37

Signatures


38

Certifications


39

2


CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements contained in this report constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements other than statements of historical facts included in this report regarding our financial position, business strategy, budgets and plans and objectives of management for future operations are forward-looking statements. Although we believe that our plans, intentions and expectations reflected in or suggested by these forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot assure you that we will achieve or realize these plans, intentions or expectations. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, our performance or achievements, or industry results, to be materially different from those contemplated or projected, forecasted, estimated or budgeted in or expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, the risks and other factors set forth under Item 7A in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, as well as the following: general economic and business conditions; governmental regulations; industry trends; the loss of major customers or suppliers; cost and availability of raw materials; changes in business strategy or development plans, including acquisition or disposition of assets; availability and quality of management; and availability, terms and deployment of capital. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.



PART 1
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements


UNITED INDUSTRIES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

JUNE 30, 2002 AND 2001, AND DECEMBER 31, 2001

(Dollars in thousands)

(Unaudited)thousands, except share data)

 
 June 30,
2002

 June 30,
2001

 December 31,
2001

 
ASSETS          
Current assets:          
 Cash and cash equivalents $717 $ $ 
 Accounts receivable (less allowances of $4,999 and $1,419 at June 30, 2002 and 2001 and $1,147 at December 31, 2001)  115,851  77,040  21,585 
 Inventories  49,636  38,149  49,092 
 Prepaid expenses  6,668  4,835  6,491 
  
 
 
 
  Total current assets  172,872  120,024  77,168 
Equipment and leasehold improvements  29,151  24,276  27,930 
Deferred income tax  112,863  116,763  112,505 
Goodwill and Intangible assets  82,118  5,714  43,116 
Other assets  13,661  12,918  11,837 
  
 
 
 
  Total assets $410,665 $279,695 $272,556 
  
 
 
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT          
Current liabilities:          
 Current maturities of long-term debt and capital lease obligation $7,790 $5,693 $5,711 
 Accounts payable  43,076  29,527  23,459 
 Accrued expenses  49,724  33,887  34,006 
 Short-term borrowings    18,550  23,450 
  
 
 
 
  Total current liabilities  100,590  87,657  86,626 
Long-term debt  375,778  323,693  318,386 
Capital lease obligation  4,004  4,428  4,221 
Other liabilities  15,541  16,167  7,740 
  
 
 
 
  Total liabilities  495,913  431,945  416,973 
Stockholders' deficit          
 Preferred Stock (37,600 shares of $0.01 par value Class A)       
 Common Stock (33.1 million shares of $0.01 par value Class A and 33.1 million $0.01 par value Class B issued and outstanding at June 30, 2002)  664  554  556 
Common Stock subscription receivable  (26,071)    
Common Stock repurchase option  (2,636)    
Warrants and options  11,745  2,784  11,745 
Additional paid-in capital  206,684  139,081  152,543 
Accumulated deficit  (272,934) (291,640) (306,048)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss    (329) (513)
Common stock held in grantor trust  (2,700) (2,700) (2,700)
  
 
 
 
  Total stockholders' deficit  (85,248) (152,250) (144,417)
  
 
 
 
  Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit $410,665 $279,695 $272,556 
  
 
 
 
 
 September 30,
  
 
 
 December 31,
2001

 
 
 2002
 2001
 
 
 (unaudited)

  
 
ASSETS          
Current assets:          
 Cash and cash equivalents $47,174 $ $ 
 Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $4,513 and $843 at September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively, and $1,147 at December 31, 2001  56,112  36,855  21,585 
 Inventories  44,000  33,779  49,092 
 Prepaid expenses  6,307  4,777  6,491 
  
 
 
 
  Total current assets  153,593  75,411  77,168 
  
 
 
 
Equipment and leasehold improvements, net  27,785  24,223  27,930 
Deferred income tax  112,863  116,763  112,505 
Goodwill and intangible assets, net  82,724  5,665  43,116 
Other assets, net  12,815  12,250  11,837 
  
 
 
 
  Total assets $389,780 $234,312 $272,556 
  
 
 
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT          
Current liabilities:          
 Current maturities of long-term debt and capital lease obligation $9,530 $5,699 $5,711 
 Accounts payable  21,878  13,146  23,459 
 Accrued expenses  52,842  26,898  34,006 
 Short-term borrowings      23,450 
  
 
 
 
  Total current liabilities  84,250  45,743  86,626 
  
 
 
 
Long-term debt, net of current maturities  371,230  321,039  318,386 
Capital lease obligation, net of current maturities  3,892  4,329  4,221 
Other liabilities  16,462  16,198  7,740 
  
 
 
 
  Total liabilities  475,834  387,309  416,973 
  
 
 
 
Stockholders' deficit:          
 Preferred stock (37,600 shares of $0.01 par value Class A issued and outstanding)       
 Common stock (33.1 million shares each of $0.01 par value Class A and Class B issued and outstanding at September 30, 2002; 27.7 million shares of each issued and outstanding at September 30, 2001 and December 31, 2001)  664  554  556 
 Common stock subscription receivable  (26,071)    
 Common stock repurchase option  (2,636)    
 Warrants and options  11,888  2,784  11,745 
 Additional paid-in capital  206,827  139,051  152,543 
 Accumulated deficit  (274,026) (291,993) (306,048)
 Accumulated other comprehensive loss    (693) (513)
 Common stock held in grantor trust  (2,700) (2,700) (2,700)
  
 
 
 
  Total stockholders' deficit  (86,054) (152,997) (144,417)
  
 
 
 
  Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit $389,780 $234,312 $272,556 
  
 
 
 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

24



UNITED INDUSTRIES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands)

 
 Three months ended September 30,
 Nine months ended September 30,
 
 2002
 2001
 2002
 2001
 
 (unaudited)

 (unaudited)

Sales before promotion expense $111,372 $60,541 $471,392 $273,405
Promotion expense  10,695  4,748  39,188  23,046
  
 
 
 
Net sales  100,677  55,793  432,204  250,359
  
 
 
 
Operating costs and expenses:            
 Cost of goods sold  65,209  30,104  274,683  134,811
 Selling, general and administrative expenses  27,567  16,970  87,143  59,155
  
 
 
 
 Total operating costs and expenses  92,776  47,074  361,826  193,966
  
 
 
 
Operating income  7,901  8,719  70,378  56,393
Interest expense, net  7,386  8,407  24,591  27,808
  
 
 
 
Income before income tax expense  515  312  45,787  28,585
Income tax expense  98  91  8,788  8,375
  
 
 
 
Net income $417 $221 $36,999 $20,210
  
 
 
 
Preferred stock dividends $1,188 $573 $4,656 $1,719
  
 
 
 
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders $(771)$(352)$32,343 $18,491
  
 
 
 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

5



UNITED INDUSTRIES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands)

 
 Nine months ended September 30,
 
 
 2002
 2001
 
 
 (unaudited)

 
Cash flows from operating activities:       
 Net income $36,999 $20,210 
 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities:       
  Depreciation and amortization  8,131  3,658 
  Amortization of deferred financing fees  1,977  2,018 
  Unrealized loss on interest rate swap, net of taxes    (693)
  Provision for income tax expense  8,788  8,375 
  Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisition:       
   Accounts receivable  (7,898) (16,911)
   Inventories  18,113  13,228 
   Prepaid expenses  1,214  1,580 
   Accounts payable and accrued expenses  (7,445) 294 
   Dursban related expenses    (5,385)
   Other, net  1,052  (142)
  
 
 
    Net cash flows from operating activities  60,931  26,232 
  
 
 
Cash flows from investing activities:       
 Purchases of equipment and leasehold improvements  (3,190) (2,998)
 Payments for Schultz merger, net of cash acquired  (38,300)  
  
 
 
    Net cash flows from investing activities  (41,490) (2,998)
  
 
 
Cash flows from financing activities:       
 Proceeds from additional term debt  65,000   
 Repayment of borrowings on revolver and other debt  (52,778) (23,234)
 Payments for debt issuance costs  (3,239)  
 Proceeds from issuance of common stock  17,500   
 Payment received for common stock subscription receivable  1,250   
  
 
 
    Net cash flows from financing activities  27,733  (23,234)
  
 
 
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents  47,174   
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period     
  
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $47,174 $ 
  
 
 
Noncash financing activities:       
 Preferred stock dividends accrued $4,656 $1,719 
  
 
 
 Common stock issued related to Schultz merger $6,000 $ 
  
 
 
 Common stock issued related to Bayer agreements $30,720 $ 
  
 
 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

6



UNITED INDUSTRIES CORPORATION

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002 AND 2001

(Dollars in thousands)

(Unaudited)

 
 Three months ended June 30,
 Six months ended June 30,
 
 2002
 2001
 2002
 2001
Sales before promotion expense $210,829 $124,428 $360,020 $212,864
Promotion expense  15,693  9,781  28,493  18,298
  
 
 
 
Net sales  195,136  114,647  331,527  194,566
  
 
 
 
Operating costs and expenses:            
 Cost of goods sold  122,311  60,748  209,474  104,707
 Selling, general and administrative expenses  32,337  22,121  59,576  42,185
  
 
 
 
 Total operating costs and expenses  154,648  82,869  269,050  146,892
  
 
 
 
Operating income  40,488  31,778  62,477  47,674
Interest expense  8,693  9,388  17,205  19,401
  
 
 
 
Income before provision for income taxes  31,795  22,390  45,272  28,273
Income tax expense  5,375  6,637  8,690  8,284
  
 
 
 
Net income $26,420 $15,753 $36,582 $19,989
  
 
 
 
Preferred stock dividends $1,635 $573 $3,468 $1,146
  
 
 
 
Income available to common stockholders $24,785 $15,180 $33,114 $18,843
  
 
 
 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

3



UNITED INDUSTRIES CORPORATION

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002 AND 2001

(Dollars in thousands)

(Unaudited)

 
 Six months ended
June 30,

 
 
 2002
 2001
 
Cash flows from operating activities:       
 Net income $36,582 $19,989 
 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:       
  Depreciation and amortization  5,100  2,436 
  Amortization of deferred financing fees  1,485  1,346 
  Provision for deferred income tax expense  8,690  8,284 
  Changes in assets and liabilities:       
   Increase in accounts receivable  (67,637) (57,096)
   Decrease in inventories  12,477  8,858 
   Decrease in prepaid expenses  853  1,522 
   Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses  12,055  23,465 
   Decrease in Dursban related expenses  (82) (4,614)
   Decrease in other assets  515  11 
   Other, net  (565) (386)
  
 
 
    Net cash provided by operating activities  9,473  3,815 
Investing activities:       
 Purchases of equipment and leasehold improvements  (1,859) (1,878)
 Acquisition of Schultz, net of cash acquired  (37,550)   
  
 
 
   Net cash used by investing activities  (39,409) (1,878)
Financing activities:       
 Debt issuance costs  (3,239)  
 Proceeds from issuance of common stock  18,750   
 Proceeds from additional term debt  65,000   
 Proceeds from borrowing on revolver    3,550 
 Repayment of borrowing on revolver and other debt  (49,858) (5,487)
  
 
 
   Net cash provided by financing activities  30,653  (1,937)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents  717   
Cash and cash equivalents—beginning of period     
  
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents—end of period $717 $ 
  
 
 
Significant noncash financing activity:       
 Preferred Stock dividends accrued $3,468 $1,146 
 Common stock issued related to Schultz Company merger $6,000 $ 
 Common stock issued related to Bayer $26,071 $ 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

4



UNITED INDUSTRIES CORPORATION
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in thousands)

(Unaudited)(UNAUDITED)

Note 1—Organization and Basis of presentationPresentation

        United Industries Corporation (the Company) is the leading manufacturer and marketer of value-oriented branded products for the consumer lawn and garden care and insect control markets in the United States. The Company manufactures and markets one of the broadest lines of pesticides in the industry, including herbicides and indoor and outdoor insecticides, as well as insect repellents, fertilizers and soils, under a variety of brand names. As described further in Note 12, the Company's operations are divided into three business segments: Lawn and Garden, Household and Contract.

        The accompanying unauditedconsolidated financial statements include the accounts and balances of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the instructionsUnited States for Form 10-Qinterim financial information and do not include allthe rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, certain information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. Infootnote disclosures typically included in the opinion of management, all material adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentationCompany's Annual Report on Form 10-K have been included. Operating resultscondensed or omitted for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results for any other quarter or for the full year. These statementsthis report. As such, this report should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and accompanying notes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K of United Industries Corporation (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2001. Certain amounts in the 2001 consolidated financial statements included herein have been reclassified to conform with the 2002 presentation.

        The accompanying consolidated financial statements are unaudited. In the opinion of management, such statements include all adjustments, which consist of only normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the periods presented. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Note 2—Business combinationCombination

        On May 9, 2002, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company completed a merger with and into Schultz Company (Schultz). Schultz manufactures, a manufacturer of horticultural products and specialty items, particularly for the indoor houseplant care segment of the market. Schultz also distributesmarket, and a distributor of charcoal, potting soil and soil conditioners. Schultz distributes its products mainlyare distributed primarily to retail outlets and nurseries throughout the United States and Canada. The merger was executed in order to achieve economies of scale and synergistic efficiencies. Goodwill was recognized inAs a result of the merger, due to the purchase price being in excessSchultz became a wholly owned subsidiary of the estimated fair value of net assets acquired, including identified intangibles and tradenames. The transaction was accounted for using purchase accounting.Company. The total purchase price included cash payments of $37,550,$38.3 million, including related acquisition costs, issuance of 600,000 shares of Class A Voting Common Stockvoting common stock valued at $3,000$3.0 million and issuance of 600,000 shares of Class B Non-Voting Common Stocknon-voting common stock valued at $3,000.$3.0 million. In exchange for the Company's cash and Common Stockcommon stock consideration, the Company received all of the outstanding shares of Schultz. The Company has preliminarily allocated 50% of the purchase price in excessto intangible assets and 50% to goodwill. The acquired intangible assets consist of trade names and other intellectual property, as well as a $1.5 million purchase accounting inventory write-up, which are not deductible for tax purposes.

        The transaction was accounted for using the estimated fair valuepurchase method of accounting and, accordingly, the results of operations of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed to intangibles and 50% to goodwill.have been included in the

7



consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition. The actual purchase price allocationwas allocated to reflect the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed will be completed oncebased on fair values. The allocation of the Company finishes itspurchase price is based, in part, on preliminary information, which is subject to adjustment upon obtaining complete valuation of such assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The valuation will be completed duringinformation. While the third quarter of 2002. The final purchase price allocation may differ significantly from the preliminary allocation included in this report. The merger included estimated goodwill and other intangible assetsreport, management believes that finalization of $38,050. The acquired intangible assets consistthe allocation of tradenames and other intellectual property and arethe purchase price will not deductible for tax purposes. Thehave a material impact on the consolidated results of Schultz are included in the Company's consolidatedoperations or financial statements from the dateposition of the merger through the endCompany. Allocation of the period.purchase price is expected to be completed by the second quarter of 2003.

        The Company's unaudited consolidated results of operations on a pro forma basis, assumingas if the merger had occurred at the beginning of fiscalon January 1, 2001, are:include net sales of $386,289 and $264,964$487.0 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2002 and June$333.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 respectively. Netand net income of $40,227 and $23,827$40.6 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2002 and June$21.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001, respectively. These2001. This unaudited pro forma results arefinancial information does not purport to be indicative of the operatingconsolidated results of operations that would have occurredbeen achieved had these acquisitionsthis transaction been consummated at the beginningcompleted as of the yearassumed date or of future operating results.which may be obtained in the future.

        The Company's funding sources for the merger were as follows: (1)an additional $35,000$35.0 million add-on to the Term Loan B of the Company's Senior Credit Facility. The newly amended Senior Credit Facility increased the Term Loan B from $180,000 to $215,000, increased the revolvingsenior credit facility from $80,000 to $90,000 and provided additional capital expenditure flexibility. The Senior Credit Facility retains Banc of America Securities, L.L.C. as sole Lead Arranger and Lead Agent. The Company

5



incurred $2,168 of fees related to(see Note 9), the new amendment to the Senior Credit Facility. The new amendment to the Senior Credit Facility did not cause a change in the existing financial covenants; and (2) Issuanceissuance of 1,690,000 shares of Class A Voting Common Stockvoting common stock to UIC Holdings, L.L.C. in exchange for $8,450$8.5 million and the issuance of 1,690,000 shares of Class B Non-Voting Common Stocknon-voting common stock to UIC Holdings, L.L.C. in exchange for $8,450.$8.5 million. The issuance of shares to UIC Holdings, L.L.C. was a condition precedent to the effectivenessamendment of the newly amended Senior Credit Facility.senior credit facility.

Note 3—Inventories

        Inventories are as follows:consist of the following (dollars in thousands):



 September 30,
  
 


 December 31,
2001

 

 June 30,
2002

 June 30,
2001

 December 31,
2001

 
 2002
 2001
 
Raw materials $17,538 $8,895 $11,104 Raw materials $16,153 $7,421 $11,104 
Finished goods 36,661 30,658 40,688 Finished goods 32,242 27,593 40,688 
Allowance for obsolete and slow-moving inventory (4,563) (1,404) (2,700)Allowance for obsolete and slow-moving inventory (4,395) (1,235) (2,700)
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total inventories $49,636 $38,149 $49,092 
 
 
 
 Total inventories $44,000 $33,779 $49,092 
 
 
 
 

8


Note 4—Equipment and leasehold improvementsLeasehold Improvements

        Equipment and leasehold improvements are as follows:consist of the following (dollars in thousands):



 September 30,
  
 


 December 31,
2001

 

 June 30,
2002

 June 30,
2001

 December 31,
2001

 
 2002
 2001
 
Machinery and equipment $36,853 $28,773 $30,279 Machinery and equipment $36,137 $29,460 $30,279 
Office furniture and equipment 18,847 10,951 15,181 Office furniture and equipment 19,768 11,120 15,181 
Automobiles, trucks and aircraft 6,284 6,156 6,157 Automobiles, trucks and aircraft 6,245 6,156 6,157 
Leasehold improvements 7,521 7,108 7,405 Leasehold improvements 8,645 7,372 7,405 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 69,505 52,988 59,022   70,795 54,108 59,022 
Accumulated depreciation (40,354) (28,712) (31,092)
Accumulated depreciation and amortizationAccumulated depreciation and amortization (43,010) (29,885) (31,092)
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 $29,151 $24,276 $27,930 Total equipment and leasehold improvements, net $27,785 $24,223 $27,930 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 

6


Note 5—Goodwill and intangible assetsIntangible Assets

        Goodwill and intangible assets are as follows:consist of the following (dollars in thousands):


 June 30,
2002

 June 30,
2001

 December 31,
2001

 
Goodwill $26,200 $7,175 $7,175 
Accumulated amortization (1,657) (1,461) (1,559)
 
 
 
 
 September 30,
  
 24,543 5,714 5,616 
 December 31,
2001

 
 
 
 
 2002
 2001
Intangibles 58,688  37,500 
GoodwillGoodwill $25,449 $5,665 $5,616
Intangible assetsIntangible assets 58,688  37,500
Accumulated amortizationAccumulated amortization (1,113)   Accumulated amortization (1,413)  
 
 
 
   
 
 
 57,575  37,500   57,275  37,500
 
 
 
   
 
 
Total Goodwill and Intangibles $82,118 $5,714 $43,116 Total goodwill and intangible assets, net $82,724 $5,665 $43,116
 
 
 
   
 
 

        On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141, "Business Combinations" and SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets".Assets." SFAS No. 141 requires business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 to be accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and broadens the criteria for recording intangible assets separateseparately from goodwill. SFAS No. 142, among other things, eliminates the amortization of goodwill and insteadindefinite-lived intangible assets and requires goodwillthem to be tested for impairment at least annually. Under SFAS 142, if the intangible asset has an indefinite useful life, it is not amortized until its life is determined to be finite. SFAS No. 142 provides a staggered timeline for completing transitional impairment testing of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets. The Company completed its transitional impairment analysis inDuring the first quarter of 2002. Fair value was estimated2002, the Company performed an impairment analysis of its goodwill and intangible assets using the discounted cash flow method. The Company did not identifyincur any significant impairment charges related to the completion of this transitional analysis. Prospectively, the Company will test its goodwill and intangible assets for impairment annually, or more frequently as part of its annual business planning cyclewarranted by events or changes in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year.circumstances.

9



        As requiredprescribed by SFAS No. 142, theprior period operating results for prior periods were not restated in the accompanying statements of operations. Arestated. However, a reconciliation betweenfollows which reflects net income available to common stockholders as reported by the Company and income available to common stockholdersas adjusted to reflect the impact of SFAS No. 142, is as follows:if it had been adopted as of January 1, 2001 (dollars in thousands):

 
 Quarter Ended
June 30, 2001

 Six Months Ended
June 30, 2001

Net income:      
 As reported $15,753 $19,989
 Amortization of goodwill  49  150
  
 
 Adjusted net income $15,802 $20,139
  
 
 
 Three months ended
September 30, 2001

 Nine months ended
September 30, 2001

Net income, as reported $221 $20,210
Amortization of goodwill  49  199
  
 
Net income, as adjusted $270 $20,409
  
 

        On December 17, 2001, the Company acquired Vigoro®the Vigoro®, Sta-Green®Sta-Green® and Bandini®,Bandini® brand names, as well as licensing rights to the Best®Best® line of fertilizer products from Pursell Industries, Inc. (Pursell) for $37,500.$37.5 million. The acquired brandsbrand names and licensing rights are being amortized over 40 years.

7



        On        As described in Note 2, on May 9, 2002, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company completed a merger with Schultz Company.and into Schultz. The merger included a preliminary allocation of purchase price to goodwill and other intangible assetsincluded cash payments of $38,050. The$38.3 million, including related acquisition costs, of which the Company has preliminarily allocated 50% of the purchase price in excess of the fair value ofto intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed to intangibles and 50% to goodwill. The intangiblesacquired intangible assets are being amortized over 25 years.

        On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets." SFAS No. 144 addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment of long-lived assets and for long lived assets to be disposed of and supersedes SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of." SFAS No. 144 establishes a single accounting model for long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale and resolves implementation issues related to SFAS No. 121. Adoption of SFAS No. 144 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

Note 6—Other assetsAssets

        Other assets are as follows:consist of the following (dollars in thousands):



 September 30,
  
 


 December 31,
2001

 

 June 30,
2002

 June 30,
2001

 December 31,
2001

 
 2002
 2001
 
Deferred financing fees $21,306 $18,067 $18,067 Deferred financing fees $20,922 $18,067 $18,067 
Accumulated amortization (8,587) (5,757) (7,102)Accumulated amortization (9,079) (6,429) (7,102)
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 12,719 12,310 10,965   11,843 11,638 10,965 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Other 942 608 872 Other 972 612 872 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total other assets $13,661 $12,918 $11,837 
 
 
 
 Total other assets, net $12,815 $12,250 $11,837 
 
 
 
 

10


Note 7—Accrued expensesExpenses

        Accrued expenses consist of the following (dollars in thousands):

 
 September 30,
  
 
 December 31,
2001

 
 2002
 2001
Advertising and promotions $26,112 $10,513 $12,125
Facilities rationalization  2,682    3,500
Dursban related expenses    681  82
Interest  7,406  7,723  3,763
Cash overdraft    1,171  7,126
Non-compete agreement  1,625    1,360
Preferred stock dividends accrued  7,268  2,039  2,612
Severance costs  878  205  1,679
Other  6,871  4,566  1,759
  
 
 
 Total accrued expenses $52,842 $26,898 $34,006
  
 
 

Note 8—Facilities and Organization Rationalization

        During the fourth quarter of 2001, the Company recorded accrued expenses of $5.6 million related to facilities and organization rationalization. In connection therewith, 85 employees were terminated and provided severance packages. All costs associated with the facilities and organization rationalization are as follows:expected to be incurred by December 31, 2002. The following table presents the balances of and amounts recorded against such accrued expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 (dollars in thousands):

 
 June 30,
2002

 June 30,
2001

 December 31,
2001

Advertising and promotional $24,930 $13,506 $12,125
Facilities rationalization  3,153    3,500
Dursban related expenses    1,452  82
Interest  3,986  3,834  3,763
Cash overdraft    7,414  7,126
Non-compete agreement  1,625    1,360
Preferred dividend payable  5,760  1,466  2,612
Severence charges  892  457  1,679
Other  9,378  5,758  1,759
  
 
 
Total accrued expenses $49,724 $33,887 $34,006
  
 
 
 
 Facilities
Rationalization

 Severance
Costs

 Total
Costs

 
Balance at December 31, 2001 $3,500 $1,658 $5,158 
Charges against the accrued expenses  (818) (820) (1,638)
  
 
 
 
Balance at September 30, 2002 $2,682 $838 $3,520 
  
 
 
 

811


Note 8—9—Long-term debtDebt

        Long-term debt is comprisedconsists of the following:following (dollars in thousands):

 
 June 30,
2002

 June 30,
2001

 December 31,
2001

 
Senior Credit Facility:          
 Term Loan A $34,593 $43,817 $39,205 
 Term Loan B  198,553  135,183  134,488 
 Revolving Credit Facility    18,550  23,450 
97/8% Series B Registered Senior Subordinated Notes  150,000  150,000  150,000 
  
 
 
 
   383,146  347,550  347,143 
Less portion due within one year  (7,368) (23,857) (28,757)
  
 
 
 
Total long-term debt net of current portion $375,778 $323,693 $318,386 
  
 
 
 
 
 September 30,
  
 
 
 December 31,
2001

 
 
 2002
 2001
 
Senior Credit Facility:          
 Term Loan A $32,285 $41,511 $39,205 
 Term Loan B  198,040  134,835  134,488 
 Revolving Credit Facility      23,450 
97/8% Series B Senior Subordinated Notes  150,000  150,000  150,000 
  
 
 
 
   380,325  326,346  347,143 
 Less current maturities  (9,095) (5,307) (28,757)
  
 
 
 
  Total long-term debt, net of current maturities $371,230 $321,039 $318,386 
  
 
 
 

        The Senior Credit Facilitysenior credit facility was provided by Bank of America, N.A. (formerly known as NationsBank, N.A.), Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. and CIBC Inc. and consists of (i) a $90,000$90.0 million revolving credit facility (the "RevolvingRevolving Credit Facility")Facility); (ii) a $75,000$75.0 million term loan facility ("Term(Term Loan A")A); and (iii) a $215,000$215.0 million term loan facility ("Term(Term Loan B")B). The Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loan A mature on January 20, 2005 and Term Loan B matures on January 20, 2006. The Revolving Credit Facility is subject to a clean-down period during which the aggregate amount outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility shall not exceed $10,000$10.0 million for 30 consecutive days occurring during the period between August 1 and November 30 in each calendar year. On JuneAt September 30, 2002, $0 wasthe clean-down period had been completed and no amounts were outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility. ThereFacility, nor were nothere any compensating balance requirements forrequirements.

        In connection with the Company's merger with Schultz, the senior credit facility was amended to increase Term Loan B from $180.0 million to $215.0 million, increase the Revolving Credit Facility at June 30, 2002.

        On May 9, 2002 the Company merged with Schultz. In conjunction with the Schultz acquisition the Company received approval from its banking syndicate for an amendment$80.0 million to its Senior Credit Facility. The newly amended Senior Credit Facility increased the Term Loan B from $180,000 to $215,000, increased the revolving credit facility from $80,000 to $90,000$90.0 million and providedprovide additional capital expenditure flexibility. The Senior Credit Facility retains BancCompany incurred $2.2 million of America Securities, L.L.C.fees related to the amendment which were recorded as deferred financing fees and are being amortized over the sole Lead Arranger and Lead Agent.remaining term of the senior credit facility. The amendment did not change the existing covenants of the senior credit facility.

        The principal amount of Term Loan A is to be repaid in twenty-three23 consecutive quarterly installments commencing JuneSeptember 30, 1999 with a final installment due January 20, 2005. The principal amount of Term Loan B is to be repaid in twenty-seven27 consecutive quarterly installments commencing JuneSeptember 30, 1999 with a final installment due January 20, 2006.

        The Senior Credit Facilitysenior credit facility agreement contains restrictive affirmative, negative and financial covenants. Affirmative and negative covenants putplace restrictions on levels of investments, indebtedness, insurance and capital expenditures. Financial covenants require the maintenance of certain financial ratios at defined levels. At JuneSeptember 30, 2002, the Company was in compliance with all financial covenants. While the Company does not anticipate an event of non-compliance with financial covenants in the immediate future, the effect of non-compliance with financial covenants would causerequire the Company to request a waiver or an

9



amendment to the Senior Credit Facility.senior credit facility. The result of amending the Senior Credit Facilitysenior credit facility could cause a reductionresult in the limit ofchanges to the Company's Revolving Credit Facility and changes in theborrowing capacity or its effective interest rates of the Revolving Credit Facility.

rates. Under the covenants, interest rates on the

12



Revolving Credit Facility, Term Loan A and Term Loan B rangesrange from 2502.50% to 400 basis points4.00% above LIBOR depending on certain financial ratios. Unused commitments under the Revolving Credit Facility are subject to a 50 basis point0.5% annual commitment fee. LIBOR was 1.84%1.82% at JuneSeptember 30, 2002.

        The Senior Credit Facilitysenior credit facility may be prepaid at any time in whole or in part without premium or penalty. During fiscal 2001, the Company made principal payments of $9.2 million on Term LoansLoan A and $1.4 million on Term Loan B, of $9,200 and $1,400, respectively, were paid, which included optional principal prepayments of $4,100 and $700$4.1 million on Term Loan A and $0.7 million on Term Loan B, respectively.B. During the six month periodnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2002, the Company made optional principal prepayments of $4,612 and $936$4.6 million on Term Loan A and $0.9 million on Term Loan B, respectively, were paid.B. The optional payments were made in order for the Company to remain two quarterly payments ahead of the regular payment schedule. According to the Senior Credit Facilitysenior credit facility agreement, each prepayment on Term Loan A and Term Loan B can be applied to the next principal repayment installments. Management intends to pay a full year of principal installments in 2002 in accordance with the Senior Credit Facility agreement.terms of the senior credit facility.

        Substantially all of the properties and assets of the Company and substantially all of the properties and assets of the Company'sany current or future domestic subsidiaries of the Company secure obligations under the Senior Credit Facility.senior credit facility.

        The carrying amount of the Company's obligation under the Senior Credit Facility approximatesenior credit facility approximates fair value because the interest rates are based on floating interest rates identified by reference to market rates.

        In November 1999, the Company issued $150.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 97/8% Series B senior subordinated notes (the Senior Subordinated Notes for $150 million that areNotes) due April 1, 2009. Interest accrues at the rate of 97/8% per annum, payable semi-annually on each April 1 and October 1.

        Aggregate maturitiesThe table below presents the aggregate future principal payments under the Senior Credit Facilitysenior credit facility and the Senior Subordinated Notes are as follows:of September 30, 2002 (dollars in thousands):

2002 Remainder of year $
Year

 Amount
Remainder of 2002 $4,035
2003 16,464 9,174
2004 18,194 18,629
2005 150,003 150,002
2006 48,485 48,485
Thereafter 150,000 150,000
 
 
 $383,146 $380,325
 
 

10


Note 9—10—Commitments

        The Company leases the majority of its operating facilities from a company owned by a significant shareholder of the Company under various operating leases expiring December 31, 2010. The Company has options to terminate the leases on a year-to-year basis by giving advance notice of at least twelve months. TheSuch notice was given relative to the Company's corporate headquarters in St. Louis as the Company prepares to move to its newly constructed corporate headquarters in December 2002. In addition, the Company leases a

13



portion of its operating facilities from the same company under a sublease agreement expiring on December 31, 2005. The Company has two five-year options to renew thissuch lease beginning January 1, 2006. Management believes that the terms and expenses associated with the related partythese leases described above are similar to those that would be negotiated bywith unrelated parties at arm's length.parties.

        The Company is obligated under other operating leases for use of warehouse space. The leases expire at various dates through December 31, 2012. Five of the leases provide as many as five five-year options to renew.renew for five years per renewal.

Note 10—11—Contingencies

        The Company isWe are involved from time to time in litigation and arbitration proceedings in the normal course of business that assert product liabilityroutine legal matters and other claims. The Company is contesting all such claims.claims incidental to our business. When it appears probable in management's judgment that the Company will incur monetary damages or other costs in connection with such claims and proceedings, and such costs can be reasonably estimated, appropriate liabilities are recorded in the consolidated financial statements and charges are made against earnings.

        Management believes We believe that the possibilityresolution of such routine matters and other incidental claims, taking into account established reserves and insurance, will not have a material adverse effectimpact on the Company'sour consolidated financial position or results of operations and cash flows from the claims and proceedings described above are remote.operations.

Note 11—12—Segment Information

        During the third quarter of 2002, the Company began reporting its operating results using three reportable segments: Lawn and Garden, Household and Contract. Segments were established primarily by product type which represents the basis upon which management reviews and assesses the Company's financial performance. The Lawn and Garden segment primarily consists of dry, granular slow-release lawn fertilizers, lawn fertilizer combination and lawn control products, herbicides and selective herbicides, water-soluble and controlled-release garden and indoor plant foods, plant care products, potting soils and other growing media products, and outdoor pesticide products. Products are marketed to mass merchandisers, home improvement centers, hardware chains, nurseries and gardens centers. This segment includes, among others, the Company's Spectracide®, Spectracide Terminate®, Peters®, Garden Safe®, Schultz®, Expert Gardener®, Vigoro® and Sta-Green® brands.

        The Household segment represents household insecticides and insect repellants that allow consumers to achieve and maintain a pest-free household and repel insects. The Household segment includes, among others, the Company's Hot Shot® and Cutter® brands, as well as a number of private label products.

        The Contract segment represents the Company's non-core products and includes various compounds and chemicals such as charcoal, cleaning solutions and automotive products.

        The table which follows presents certain financial segment information in accordance with SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information." The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant policies in Note 1 to the financial statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, as applicable. The segment financial information presented

14



includes comparative periods prepared on a basis consistent with the current year presentation (dollars in thousands).

 
 Three months ended September 30,
 Nine months ended September 30,
 
 
 2002
 2001
 2002
 2001
 
Net sales:             
 Lawn and Garden $64,465 $31,013 $319,044 $154,559 
 Household  29,406  24,101  98,057  93,468 
 Contract  6,806  679  15,103  2,332 
  
 
 
 
 
  Total net sales $100,677 $55,793 $432,204 $250,359 
  
 
 
 
 
Operating income:             
 Lawn and Garden $1,372 $3,668 $42,381 $32,722 
 Household  5,963  5,065  26,813  23,591 
 Contract  566  (14) 1,184  80 
  
 
 
 
 
  Total operating income $7,901 $8,719 $70,378 $56,393 
  
 
 
 
 
Operating margin:             
 Lawn and Garden  2.1% 11.8% 13.3% 21.2%
 Household  20.3% 21.0% 27.3% 25.2%
 Contract  8.3% -2.1% 7.8% 3.4%
  Total operating margin  7.8% 15.6% 16.3% 22.5%

        Operating income represents earnings before net interest expense and income tax expense. Operating income is the measure of profitability used by management to assess the Company's financial performance. Operating margin represents operating income as a percentage of net sales.

        The majority of the Company's sales are made to customers in the United States. The Company's international sales comprise less than 10% of total net sales in the aggregate. In addition, no single product comprises more than 10% of the Company's net sales. The Company's three largest customers were responsible for 83.0% of net sales for the three months ended September 30, 2002, 75.5% for the three months ended September 30, 2001, 81.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 74.8% for the nine months ended September 30, 2001.

        As the Company's assets support production across all segments, they are managed on an entity-wide basis at the corporate level and are not recorded or analyzed by segment. Substantially all of the Company's assets are located in the United States.

Note 13—Shipping and handling costsHandling Costs

        Shipping and handling costs of $3.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002, $2.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2001, $12.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and $10.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 are included in the selling, general and administrative expenses line item onin the Company's Statementsaccompanying consolidated statements of Operations. The amount is $4,752 and $4,230 for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The amount included is $8,536 and $7,906 for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively. This cost representsoperations. These costs represent internal freight movements and distribution cost. The remainingcosts. Additional shipping and

15



handling cost, which includescosts, representing out-bound freight, are included in the cost of goods sold line item.in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Note 12—14—Derivatives and Hedging Activities

        The Company is exposed to market risks relating to changes in interest rates and raw materials prices. The Company periodically enters into derivative or hedging agreements to manage and reduce the impact of changes in interest rates or raw materials price fluctuations. The Company does not enter into derivatives or other hedging arrangements for trading or speculative purposes. As of September 30, 2002, the Company did not utilize any derivative or hedging instruments.

Note 15—Comprehensive incomeIncome

        Comprehensive income differs from net income in prior periods due to an one yeara one-year interest rate hedging arrangement which expired on April 1, 2002 that was accounted for as a cash flow hedge and expired on April 1, 2002.hedge. Comprehensive income (loss) was $0.4 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2002, $(0.1 million) for the three months ended September 30, 2001, $37.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 was $26,614 and $15,424, respectively. Comprehensive income$19.5 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2002 and 2001 was $37,095 and $19,660, respectively.2001.

11



Note 13—Facilities and organization rationalization

        During the fourth quarter of 2001 the Company recorded a $5,550 charge related to facilities and organizational rationalization. The following is a rollforward of the charge for the six months ended June 30, 2002.

 
 Facility
Exit Cost

 Severance
Cost

 Total
Cost

 
Balance at beginning of year $3,500 $1,658 $5,158 
Provision charged to expense       
Reversal credited to expense       
Charges to accrual  (347) (766) (1,113)
  
 
 
 
Balance at June 30, 2002 $3,153 $892 $4,045 
  
 
 
 

Note 14—16—Bayer strategic partnershipStrategic Partnership

        On June 14, 2002, the Company and Bayer Corporation and Bayer Advanced, L.L.C. (Bayer)(together referred to herein as Bayer) consummated thea strategic partnership that the parties entered into on June 7, 2002.partnership. The strategic partnership is built upon three key components: (1) Theallows the Company gainsto gain access to certain Bayer active ingredient technologies through a Supply Agreement; (2) The Company performsAgreement and to perform certain merchandising services for Bayer through aan In-Store Services Agreement; and (3)Service Agreement. In connection with the strategic partnership, Bayer obtainsacquired a 9.3% minority ownership ininterest, approximately 9.3% of the issued and outstanding Common Stock shares of the CompanyCompany's common stock, under the terms of thean Exchange Agreement in exchange for promissory notes due to Bayer from Pursell (see Note 19) and the execution of the two agreements previously mentioned.Supply and In-Store Service Agreements.

        Under the terms of the Exchange Agreement, the Company has the right to repurchase the shares exchanged withissued to Bayer upon the termination of the In-Store ServicesService Agreement. Termination of the In-Store ServicesService Agreement can occur with or without cause. If the Company elects to terminate the In-Store ServicesService Agreement without cause, it must give Bayer sixty days notice of its intention to terminate the In-Store Services Agreement.terminate. If the Company exercises its repurchase option, it will repurchase its shares based on a price as determined byprovided for in the In-Store ServicesService Agreement. It is generally believed that the repurchase price per share would represent the fair market value of the shares at the time such repurchase option is exercised.

        In exchange for the promissory notes received from Bayer and the execution of the Supply and In-Store agreements,Service Agreements, the Company issued to Bayer 3.1 million3,072,000 shares of Class A Voting Common Stockvoting common stock valued at $15,360$15.4 million and 3.1 million3,072,000 shares of Class B Non-Voting Common Stocknon-voting common stock valued at $15,360.$15.4 million. The promissory notes received from Bayer are due from Pursell Industries, Inc. The Company has reserved for the entire face value of the promissory notes based ondue to Bayer from Pursell as the Company did not believe they were collectible and an independent third party valuation.valuation did not ascribe any value to them.

1216



        In addition, based on anthe independent third party valuation, the Company has assigned the $30,720a fair value of $30.7 million to the Common Stock exchanged withcommon stock issued to Bayer as follows:follows (dollars in thousands):

Common Stock subsciption receivable $27,321 
Supply Agreement  5,694 
Repurchase Option  2,636 
In-Store Services Agreement  (4,931)
  
 
  $30,720 
  
 
Description

 Amount
 
Common stock subscription receivable $27,321 
Supply Agreement  5,694 
Repurchase option  2,636 
In-Store Service Agreement  (4,931)
  
 
  $30,720 
  
 

        Under the requirements of the agreements, Bayer will make payments to the Company which total $5,000$5.0 million annually for the next seven years, the present value of which equates toequals the value assigned to the Common Stockcommon stock subscription receivable, which is reflected in the equity section ofin the Company's accompanying consolidated balance sheet at JuneSeptember 30, 2002. The Common Stockcommon stock subscription receivable will be repaid in 28 quarterly installments of $1,250,$1.25 million, one of which was received at closing on June 17, 2002. The difference between the value ascribed to the Common Stockcommon stock subscription receivable and the installment payments will be reflected as interest income in the Company's Statementconsolidated statements of Operationsoperations over the next seven years.

        Bayer has the right to put the shares received from the Company back to the Company under the terms of the Exchange Agreement. Bayer can terminate the Exchange Agreement within the first 36 months if the Company fails to meet certain performance guidelines as established in the Exchange Agreement. In conjunction with the termination, Bayer can put the Company's Common Stockshares received back to the Company within 30 days of the termination of the Exchange Agreement at a price as determined byprovided for in the Exchange Agreement. It is generally believed that the put price per share would represent the fair market value of the shares at the time such put option is exercised.

        The value of the Supply Agreement and the liability associated with the In-Store ServicesService Agreement will be amortized over the pattern and period in which economic benefits under the Supply Agreement are consumedutilized and the obligations under the In-Store Service Agreement are fulfilled. The Company will amortizeis amortizing the asset associated with the Supply Agreement to cost of goods sold and currently anticipates the benefit will be recognized over a three to five yearfive-year period. The Company will amortizeis amortizing the obligation associated with the In-Store ServicesService Agreement to revenues and currently anticipates the obligation will be recognized over the seven-year life of the agreement.agreement (see Note 19). The independent third party valuation obtained by the Company also determinedindicated that value should be ascribed to a repurchase option owned by the Company under the agreements has value.agreements. The effect of the repurchase option is reflected as a reduction to equity in the Company's equity.accompanying consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2002. This amount will be recorded as a component of additional paid-in capital upon the exercise of the option or its expiration.

13Note 17—Related Party Transactions

        On September 28, 2001, the Company entered into a loan agreement with Robert L. Caulk, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, for $400,000 which matures on September 28, 2006 (the 2001 Loan). On March 8, 2002, the Company entered into a loan agreement with Mr. Caulk for $51,685 which matures on March 8, 2007 (the 2002

17



Loan). The purpose for both loans was to allow Mr. Caulk to purchase shares of the Company's common and preferred stock. The loans bear interest at LIBOR which is adjusted on the respective anniversary date of each loan. The interest rate in effect as of September 30, 2002 was 1.81%. Interest on both loans is payable annually, based on outstanding accrued amounts on December 31 of each year. Principal payments on both loans are based on 25% of the gross amount of each annual bonus awarded to Mr. Caulk and are immediately payable, except that principal payments on the 2002 Loan are immediately payable only if all amounts due under the 2001 Loan are fully paid. Any unpaid principal and interest on both loans is due upon maturity. The outstanding principal balance for the 2001 Loan was $352,000 as of September 30, 2002 and $400,000 as of December 31, 2001. The outstanding principal balance of the 2002 Loan was $51,685 as of September 30, 2002.

Note 18—Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

        In June 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities." SFAS No. 146 addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)." SFAS No. 146 requires that a liability for costs associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred rather than when a company commits to such an activity and also establishes fair value as the objective for initial measurement of the liability. SFAS No. 146 will be adopted by the Company for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. Adoption will not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements of the Company.

Note 19—Subsequent Events

        On October 3, 2002, the Company signed an asset purchase agreement to acquire certain assets from Pursell, which renamed itself U.S. Fertilizer subsequent to the agreement, for a cash purchase price of $12.1 million and forgiveness of the Pursell promissory notes (see Note 16), subject to final purchase price adjustments. The assets acquired included certain inventory and equipment at two of Pursell's facilities and real estate at one of the two facilities. The facilities acquired from Pursell, located in Orrville, Ohio and Sylacauga, Alabama, previously fulfilled, and are expected to continue to fulfill, over half of the Company's fertilizer manufacturing requirements.

        Also on October 3, 2002, the Company signed a tolling agreement with Pursell whereby Pursell will supply the Company with the remainder of its fertilizer needs. The tolling agreement requires the Company to be responsible for certain raw materials, capital expenditures and other related costs for Pursell to manufacture and supply the Company with fertilizer products. The agreement does not require a minimum volume purchase of Pursell's manufacturing services but does provide for a fixed monthly payment of $0.7 million through the term of the tolling agreement which expires on September 30, 2007. The agreement provides the Company with early termination rights without penalty. In addition, beginning on March 1, 2004 and on each anniversary thereafter, the fixed payment is subject to certain increases for labor, materials, inflation and other reasonable costs as outlined in the tolling agreement.

18



Item 2:2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

        Certain statements contained herein constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended." All statements other than statements of historical facts included in this report regarding the Company's financial position, business strategy, budgets and plans and objectives of management for future operations are forward-looking statements. Although the management of the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to have been correct. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company, or industry results, to be materially different from those contemplated or projected, forecasted, estimated or budgeted in or expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, the risks and other factors set forth under Item 7A in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 as well as the following: general economic and business conditions; governmental regulations; industry trends; the loss of major customers or suppliers; cost and availability of raw materials; changes in business strategy or development plans including acquisition or disposition of assets; availability and quality of management; and availability, terms and deployment of capital. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Overview

        The Company isdiscussion and analysis of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations included herein should be read in conjunction with our historical financial information included in the unaudited consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.

General

        We are the leading manufacturer and marketer of value-oriented branded products for the consumer lawn and garden care and insect control markets in the United States. The Company manufacturesWe manufacture and marketsmarket one of the broadest lines of pesticides in the industry, including herbicides and indoor and outdoor insecticides, as well as insect repellents, fertilizers and fertilizers,soils, under a variety of brand names. The Company believesWe believe that the key drivers of growth for the $2.8 billion consumer lawn and garden pesticide and household insecticide retail markets include: (a) the aging of the United States population; (b) growth in the home improvement center and mass merchandiser channels; and (c) shifting consumers'consumer preferences toward value-oriented branded products; and (d) increased levels in consumer income, debt and spending.

        During the third quarter of 2002, we began reporting operating results using three reportable segments: Lawn and Garden, Household and Contract. Segments were established primarily by product type which represents the basis upon which management reviews and assesses our financial performance. The Lawn and Garden segment primarily consists of dry, granular slow-release lawn fertilizers, lawn fertilizer combination and lawn control products, herbicides and selective herbicides, water-soluble and controlled-release garden and indoor plant foods, plant care products, potting soils and other growing media products, and outdoor pesticide products. Products are marketed to mass merchandisers, home improvement centers, hardware chains, nurseries and gardens centers. This segment includes, among others, our Spectracide®, Spectracide Terminate®, Peters®, Garden Safe®, Schultz®, Expert Gardener®, Vigoro® and Sta-Green® brands.

        The Household segment represents household insecticides and insect repellants that allow consumers to achieve and maintain a pest-free household and repel insects. The Household segment includes, among others, our Hot Shot® and Cutter® brands, as well as a number of private label products.

        The following discussionContract segment represents our non-core products and analysis of the Company's financial conditionincludes various compounds and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the historical financial information included in the unaudited quarterly financial statementschemicals such as charcoal, cleaning solutions and the related notes to the unaudited quarterly financial statements.automotive products.

Critical Accounting Policies

        The Company's significantpreparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis based on a combination of historical information and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the particular circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates based on different assumptions or conditions. The accounting policies that we believe most impact our consolidated financial statements and that require our management to make difficult, subjective or complex judgments are described below. These should be read in Note 1conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and "Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" to the consolidatedour financial statements included in Item 14 of the Company'sour Annual Report filed on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001. Note that the preparation of this quarterly Report on Form 10Q requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. There can be no assurance that actual results will not differ from those estimates. The Company believes that it's most critical accounting policies include revenue recognition, inventories, promotion expense, income taxes and goodwill and other acquired intangible assets.

1419



Revenue recognitionRecognition

        Net sales arerepresent gross sales of products sold to customers in accordance with the shipping terms applicable to each sale less any applicable customer discounts from list price, customer returns and promotion expense of products through cooperative programs with retailers. The Company's provision for customer returns is based on historical sales returns, analysis of credit memo datainformation and any other knownpertinent factors. If the historical or other data the Company usesused to calculate these estimates doesdo not properly reflect future returns, revenuenet sales could be overstated.

Inventories

        Inventories are statedreported at the lower of cost or market, with cost beingmarket. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method. Costmethod and includes raw materials, direct labor and overhead. ProvisionAn allowance for potentially obsolete or slow-moving finished goods and raw materials are madeis recorded based on management's analysis of inventory levels and future sales forecasts. In the event that our estimates of future usage and sales differ from actual results, we may need to establish an additional provisionthe allowance for obsolete or slow-moving finished goods and raw materials.materials may be adjusted.

Promotion expenseExpense

        The Company advertisesWe advertise and promotes itspromote our products through printnational and electronicregional media. Products are also advertised and promoted through cooperative programs with retailers. The Company expenses advertisingAdvertising and promotion costs are expensed as incurred, although costs incurred during interim periods are generally expensed ratably in relation to revenues. Significant managementManagement judgment is required to estimate the amount of costs under our cooperative programs that hashave been incurred by the retailers.retailers under our cooperative programs. Actual costs incurred by the Company may differ significantly from our estimates if factors such as the level of participation and success of the retailers' programs or other conditions differ from our expectations.

Income taxesTaxes

        In conjunction with the Company's Recapitalizationour recapitalization consummated on January 20, 1999, the Companywe converted our company from an "S"S corporation to a "C"C corporation. As a "C"C corporation, the Company accountswe account for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of the Company'sour assets and liabilities at enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when such amounts are recovered or settled. Significant managementManagement judgment is required in determining our provision forto determine income taxes, ourtax expense, deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against our netsuch assets and deferred tax assets.liabilities. We have recorded a valuation allowance of $111.4 million as of JuneSeptember 30, 2002 due to uncertainties related to our ability to utilize some of our deferred tax assets, primarily consisting of certain net operating losses carried forwardloss carryforwards and deductible goodwill createdrecorded in conjunctionconnection with the Recapitalization.our recapitalization in 1999. The valuation allowance is based on our estimates of taxable income by jurisdiction in which our deferred tax assets will be recoverable. In the event that actual results differ from those estimates or we adjust these estimates in future periods, we may need to establish an additional valuation allowance or reduce our currentadjust the valuation allowance, which could materially impact our consolidated financial position and results of operations.

Goodwill and Other Acquired Intangible Assets

        The Company hasWe have acquired intangible assets or made acquisitions in the past that included a significant amountresulted in the recording of goodwill, including our acquisition of fertilizer brands in December 2001 and other intangible assets.our merger with Schultz Company in May 2002, respectively. Under generally accepted accounting principles previously in effect, through December 31, 2001,

15



these assets were amortized over their estimated useful lives, and were tested periodically to determine if they were recoverable from operating earnings on an undiscounted basis over their useful lives.

20



        Effective in 2002, goodwill willis no longer be amortized but will beand is subject to impairment testing at least annually. We evaluate the recoverability of long-lived assets, including goodwill and intangible assets, for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an annual (or under certainasset may not be recoverable. Such events or changes in circumstances more frequent) impairment testcould include such factors as changes in technological advances, fluctuations in the fair value of such assets or adverse changes in relationships with vendors or customers. If a review indicates that the carrying value of an asset is not recoverable based on projected undiscounted net cash flows related to the asset over its remaining life, the carrying value of such asset is reduced to its estimated fair value. Other intangible assetsWhile we believe that meet certain criteria will continue to be amortized over their useful lives and will also be subject to an impairment test based on estimated fair value. Estimated fair value is typically less than values based on undiscounted operating earnings because fair valueour estimates include a discount factor in valuingof future cash flows. Thereflows are manyreasonable, different assumptions and estimates underlying the determination of an impairment loss. Another estimate using different, but still reasonable, assumptionsregarding such cash flows could produce a significantly different result.materially affect our evaluations. Therefore, additional impairment losses could be recorded in the future.

Results of Operations

        The Company currently operates in one reportable segment for financial reporting purposes. As a result of the Company's DecemberThree Months Ended September 30, 2002 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2001 acquisition of fertilizer brands and the May 2002 merger with Schultz Company (Schultz) the Company will expand its segment reporting. The Company is in the process of evaluating segment classifications. We plan to complete our integration of the fertilizer brands and Schultz, and our internal management reporting in time to report segment results in the third quarter of fiscal year 2002.

        The following discussion regarding resultstable presents amounts and the percentages of net sales that items in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations refers to net sales, cost of goods sold and selling and general and administrative expenses, whichconstitute for the Company defines as follows:periods presented (dollars in thousands):

16


Three Months Ended June 30, 2002 compared Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $10.6 million, or 62.4%, to Three Months Ended June 30, 2001

        The following table sets forth the percentage relationship of certain items in the Company's Statements of Operations to net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and June 30, 2001:

 
 Three Months Ended
June 30,

 
 
 2002
 2001
 
Net sales:     
 Value brands 80.7%81.9%
 Opening price point brands 19.3%18.1%
  
 
 
Total net sales 100.0%100.0%
Operating costs and expenses:     
 Cost of goods sold 62.7%53.0%
 Selling, general and administrative expenses 16.6%19.3%
  
 
 
Total operating costs and expenses 79.3%72.3%
  
 
 
Operating income 20.7%27.7%
Interest expense 4.5%8.2%
  
 
 
Income before provision for income taxes 16.2%19.5%
Income tax expense 2.7%5.8%
  
 
 
Net income 13.5%13.7%
  
 
 

        Net Sales.    Net sales increased 70.2% to $195.1$27.6 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2002 from $114.6$17.0 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2001. The increase was driven by a combination of offsetting factors including:

        Net sales of the Company's value brands increased 67.6% to $157.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 from $93.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001. Sales for the three months ended June 30, 2002 of fertilizer brands and Schultz products were $34.9 million and $13.5 million, respectively. The remaining increase in sales is primarily relates to sales of Spectracide products at mass merchants.

        Net sales of opening price point brands increased 81.9% to $37.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 from $20.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001. Sales for the three months ended June 30, 2002 of fertilizer brands and Schultz products were $13.8 million and $6.7 million, respectively. The additional sales related to fertilizer brands and Schultz products were offset by retailers taking delivery of inventory closer to consumer take-away and overall reduction of inventory levels at retail.

        Gross Profit.    Gross profit increased 35.1% to $72.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 compared to $53.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001. The increase in gross profit was primarily driven by the fertilizer brands and Schultz products recently acquired and partly to favorable materials pricing of key ingredients. The increase in gross profit was partially offset by the amortization of $1.5 million purchase accounting inventory write-up related to the Schultz merger. As a percentage of sales, gross profit decreased to 37.3% for the three months ended June 30, 2002 as

17



compared to 47.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2001. The decrease in gross profit as a percentage of sales was primarily due to the fertilizer brands acquired, which have margins that are significantly lower than the margins of the Company's other mix of products.

        Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.    Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 46.2% to $32.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 from $22.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001. The majority of the increase is related to supporting the fertilizer brands acquired December 2001 and the recently acquired Schultz products. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to 16.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2002 from 19.3% for the three months ended June 30, 2001. The overall decrease was due to additional sales related to the fertilizer brands acquired December 2001 that do not require a direct percentage increase in selling, general and administrative expenses of the Company.

        Operating Income.    Operating income increased 27.4% to $40.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 from $31.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001. As a percentage of net sales, operating income decreased to 20.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2002 from 27.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2001. The decrease was primarily driven by the lower margins of the fertilizer brands as compared to the Company's other products.

        Income Tax Expense.    For the three months ended June 30, 2002, the Company's effective income tax rate is 16.9%, which reflects the estimated utilization of the goodwill deduction in fiscal year 2002. The goodwill deduction is related to the step up in tax basis that occurred in conjunction with the Company's Recapitalization in 1999. This rate reflects the rate required to adjust the Company's annual effective income tax rate to 19% for the six months ended June 30, 2002, which is based on our current estimate of annual pre-tax earnings and the utilization of our goodwill deduction.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2002 compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2001

        The following table sets forth the percentage relationship of certain items in the Company's Statements of Operations to net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and June 30, 2001:

 
 Six Months Ended
June 30,

 
 
 2002
 2001
 
Net sales:     
 Value brands 80.7%82.6%
 Opening price point brands 19.3%17.4%
  
 
 
Total net sales 100.0%100.0%
Operating costs and expenses:     
 Cost of goods sold 63.2%53.8%
 Selling, general and administrative expenses 18.0%21.7%
  
 
 
Total operating costs and expenses 81.2%75.5%
  
 
 
Operating income 18.8%24.5%
Interest expense 5.2%10.0%
  
 
 
Income before provision for income taxes 13.6%14.5%
Income tax expense 2.6%4.3%
  
 
 
Net income 11.0%10.2%
  
 
 

18


        Net Sales.    Net sales increased 70.4% to $331.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 from $194.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001. The increase was driven by a combination of offsetting factors including:

        Net sales of the Company's value brands increased 66.6% to $267.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 from $160.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001. Sales for the six months ended June 30, 2002 of fertilizer brands and Schultz products were $79.7 million and $13.5 million, respectively. The remaining increase in sales is primarily due to sales of Spectracide products at mass merchants.

        Net sales of opening price point brands increased 88.3% to $63.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 from $33.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001. Sales for the six months ended June 30, 2002 of fertilizer brands and Schultz products were $31.0 million and $6.7 million, respectively. The additional sales from fertilizer brands and Schultz products were offset by retailers taking delivery of inventory closer to consumer take-away and overall reduction of inventory levels at retail.

        Gross Profit.    Gross profit increased 35.8% to $122.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 compared to $89.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001. The increase in gross profit was primarily driven by the fertilizer brands and Schultz products recently acquired and partly to favorable materials pricing of key ingredients. The increase in gross profit was partially offset by the amortization of $1.5 million purchase accounting inventory write-up related to the Schultz merger. As a percentage of sales, gross profit decreased to 36.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2002 as compared to 46.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2001. The decrease in gross profit as a percentage of sales was primarily due to the fertilizer brands acquired in December 2001, which have margins that are lower than the margins of the Company's other mix of products.

        Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.    Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 41.2% to $59.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 from $42.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001. The majority of the increase is related to supporting the fertilizer brands acquired December 2001. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to 18.0%27.4% for the sixthree months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2002 from 21.7%30.4% for the sixthree months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2001. The overall decrease was primarily due to additional sales related to theour merger with Schultz in May 2002 and our acquisition of various fertilizer brands acquired in December 2001, that do not requirewith a direct percentlesser corresponding increase in selling, general and administrative expenses of the Company.expenses.

        Operating Income.    Operating income increased 31.1%decreased $0.8 million, or 9.2%, to $62.5$7.9 million for the sixthree months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2002 from $47.7$8.7 million for the sixthree months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2001. The decrease was due to the factors described above. As a percentage of net sales, operating income decreased to 18.8%7.8% for the sixthree months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2002 from 24.5%15.6% for the sixthree months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2001. The decrease was primarily driven by thein our Lawn and Garden segment due to lower margins on the products we acquired in our merger with Schultz in May 2002 and our acquisition of thevarious fertilizer brands as comparedin December 2001.

        Operating income in the Lawn and Garden segment decreased $2.3 million, or 62.2%, to $1.4 million for the Company'sthree months ended September 30, 2002 from $3.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2001. Operating income of this segment decreased primarily due to our merger with Schultz in May 2002 and our acquisition of various fertilizer brands in December 2001, which had increased sales during the period but lower margins than our other products. Operating income in the Household segment increased $0.9 million, or 17.6%, to $6.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002 from $5.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2001. Operating income of this segment increased primarily due to increases in sales of our Cutter® and Hot Shot® brands and in our private label products. Operating income in the Contract segment increased to

22



$0.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002 primarily due to sales of new product acquired in our merger with Schultz.

        Interest Expense, Net.    Interest expense, net decreased $1.0 million, or 11.9%, to $7.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002 from $8.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2001. The decrease in net interest expense was due to a decline in our average variable borrowing rate of 1.51 percentage points to 1.82% for the three months ended September 30, 2002 from 3.33% for the three months ended September 30, 2001, resulting from a general decline in variable borrowing rates. This decrease was also due to interest income from an increase in our average cash balances available for investment during the current period, partially offset by an increase in our average debt outstanding during the current period, both of which resulted from additional borrowings under our senior credit facility to finance our merger with Schultz.

        Income Tax Expense.    For the sixthree months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2002, the Company'sour effective income tax rate is 19.2%was 16.9%, which reflects the estimated utilization of the goodwill deduction in fiscal yearduring 2002. The goodwill deduction iswas related to the step up in tax basis that occurred in conjunction with the Company's Recapitalizationour recapitalization in 1999. This rate reflects the rate required to adjust the Company's annual

19



our effective income tax rate to 19%, which is based on our current estimate of annual pre-tax earnings and the utilization of our goodwill deduction.

Pro forma financial information

        On May 9, 2002 the Company completed its merger with Schultz. The Company will account for its acquisition of Schultz using the purchase method of accounting, and accordingly, the purchase price will be allocated to the tangible and intangible assets of Schultz acquired, and the liabilities of Schultz assumed, on the basis of their values as of the acquisition date. The fiscal year of the Company ends on December 31. The fiscal year of Schultz ends onNine Months Ended September 30. The Company's statement of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 have been combined with the unaudited Schultz statement of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, for the purposes of providing the unaudited pro forma results of operations after giving effectCompared to the merger as if it had occurred on January 1, 2002 and 2001.

        The unaudited pro forma financial statements are presented for illustrative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the financial position or operating results that would have actually occurred had the merger been completed at the beginning of the periods or on the dates indicated, nor are they necessarily indicative of future financial position or operating results.

 
 Unaudited
Three months ended June 30,

 Unaudited
Six months ended June 30,

 
 2002
 2001
 2002
 2001
Sales before promotion expense $230,452 $162,561 $415,623 $284,292
Promotion expense  16,052  10,343  29,334  19,328
  
 
 
 
Net sales  214,400  152,218  386,289  264,964
  
 
 
 
Operating costs and expenses:            
 Cost of goods sold  135,798  91,010  249,174  159,691
 Selling, general and administrative expenses  35,572  25,867  67,282  49,493
  
 
 
 
 Total operating costs and expenses  171,370  116,877  316,456  209,184
  
 
 
 
Operating income  43,030  35,341  69,833  55,780
Interest expense  9,025  10,115  18,204  20,919
  
 
 
 
Income before provision for income taxes  34,005  25,226  51,629  34,861
Income tax expense  6,486  7,807  11,402  11,034
  
 
 
 
Net income $27,519 $17,419 $40,227 $23,827
  
 
 
 

20


Pro forma ThreeNine Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, 2002 compared to Pro Forma Three Months Ended June 30, 2001

        The following table sets forthpresents amounts and the percentage relationshippercentages of certainnet sales that items in the Company's unaudited Pro forma Statementsaccompanying consolidated statements of Operations to net salesoperations constitute for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and June 30, 2001:periods presented (dollars in thousands):

 
 Three Months Ended
June 30,

 
 
 2002
 2001
 
Net sales:     
 Value brands 81.5%81.9%
 Opening price point brands 18.5%18.1%
  
 
 
Total net sales 100.0%100.0%
Operating costs and expenses:     
 Cost of goods sold 63.3%59.8%
 Selling, general and administrative expenses 16.6%17.0%
  
 
 
Total operating costs and expenses 79.9%76.8%
  
 
 
Operating income 20.1%23.2%
Interest expense 4.2%6.7%
  
 
 
Income before provision for income taxes 15.9%16.5%
Income tax expense 3.1%5.1%
  
 
 
Net income 12.8%11.4%
  
 
 
 
 Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
 
 2002
 2001
 
 
 (unaudited)

 (unaudited)

 
Net sales by segment:           
 Lawn and Garden $319,044 73.8%$154,559 61.7%
 Household  98,057 22.7% 93,468 37.3%
 Contract  15,103 3.5% 2,332 1.0%
�� 
 
 
 
 
 Total net sales  432,204 100.0% 250,359 100.0%
  
 
 
 
 
Operating costs and expenses:           
 Cost of goods sold  274,683 63.6% 134,811 53.8%
 Selling, general and administrative expenses  87,143 20.1% 59,155 23.7%
  
 
 
 
 
 Total operating costs and expenses  361,826 83.7% 193,966 77.5%
  
 
 
 
 
Operating income by segment:           
 Lawn and Garden  42,381 9.8% 32,722 13.1%
 Household  26,813 6.2% 23,591 9.4%
 Contract  1,184 0.3% 80 0.0%
  
 
 
 
 
 Total operating income  70,378 16.3% 56,393 22.5%
Interest expense, net  24,591 5.7% 27,808 11.1%
  
 
 
 
 
Income before income tax expense  45,787 10.6% 28,585 11.4%
Income tax expense  8,788 2.0% 8,375 3.3%
  
 
 
 
 
 Net income $36,999 8.6%$20,210 8.1%
  
 
 
 
 

        Pro forma        Net Sales.    Net sales represent gross sales less any applicable customer discounts from list price, customer returns and promotion expense through cooperative programs with retailers. Net sales

23



increased 40.9%$181.8 million, or 72.6%, to $214.4$432.2 million for the threenine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2002 from $152.2$250.4 million for the threenine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2001. The increase, was drivenprimarily in our Lawn and Garden segment, and the change in our sales mix by a combination of offsetting factors including:

$319.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 from $154.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. Net sales of this segment increased $34.8 million as a result of our merger with Schultz, $128.7 million as a result of our merger with Schultz and our acquisition of various fertilizer brands and $25.8 million from strong sales growth of our Spectracide® brand. These increases were partially offset by lower sales volume of various other products in the Company's value brandsLawn and Garden segment. Net sales in the Household segment increased 43.8%$4.6 million, or 4.9%, to $172.1$98.1 million for the threenine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2002 from $119.7$93.5 million for the threenine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2001. Sales for the three months ended June 30, 2002Net sales of fertilizer brands was $34.9 million. The remaining increase in sales isthis segment increased primarily due to increases in sales of Spectracide products at mass merchants.

our Cutter® and Hot Shot® brands and in our private label products. Net sales in the Contract segment increased $12.8 million to $15.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 from $2.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. Net sales of opening price point brandsthis segment increased 30.0%primarily due to $42.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 from $32.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001. Sales for the three months ended June 30, 2002 of fertilizer brands was $13.8 million. The additional sales related to fertilizer brands was offset by retailers taking delivery of inventory closer to consumer take-away and overall reduction of inventory levels at retail.our merger with Schultz.

        Pro forma        Gross Profit.    Gross profit increased 28.4%$42.0 million, or 36.4%, to $78.6$157.5 million for the threenine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2002 compared to $61.2from $115.5 million for the threenine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2001. The increase in gross profit was primarily driven by thedue to our merger with Schultz in May 2002 and our acquisition of various fertilizer brands recently acquired and partly toin December 2001, coupled with favorable materials pricingcosts of key ingredients. The increase in gross profit was partially offset by the amortization of a $1.5 million purchase accounting inventory write-up related to the Schultz merger. As a percentage of net sales, gross profit decreased to 36.7%36.4% for the threenine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2002 as compared to 40.2%from 46.2% for the threenine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2001. The decrease in gross profit as a percentage of net sales was primarily due to theour merger with Schultz in May 2002 and our acquisition of various fertilizer brands and

21



Schultz products acquired,in December 2001, which have lower margins that are lower than the margins of the Company'sour other mix of products.

        Pro forma        Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.    Selling, general and administrative expenses include all costs associated with the selling and distribution of product, product registrations, and administrative functions such as finance, information systems and human resources. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 37.5%$27.9 million, or 47.1%, to $35.6$87.1 million for the threenine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2002 from $25.9$59.2 million for the threenine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2001. The majorityincrease was primarily due to our merger with Schultz in May 2002 and our acquisition of the increase is related to supporting thevarious fertilizer brands acquired in December 2001. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to 16.6%20.1% for the threenine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2002 from 17.0%23.7% for the threenine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2001. The overall decrease was primarily due to expenseadditional sales related to theour merger with Schultz in May 2002 and our acquisition of various fertilizer brands acquired in December 2001, that do not requirewith a direct percentlesser corresponding increase in selling, general and administrative expenses of the Company. The Company has excluded the non-recurring $5.1 million change of control payments that were made to five members of Schultz management.expenses.

        Pro forma        Operating Income.    Operating income increased 21.8%$14.0 million, or 24.8% to $43.0$70.4 million for the threenine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2002 from $35.3$56.4 million for the threenine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2001. The increase was due to the factors described above. As a percentage of net sales, operating income decreased to 20.1%16.3% for the threenine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2002 from 23.2%22.5% for the threenine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2001. The decrease was primarily driven by thein our Lawn and Garden segment due to lower margins on the products we acquired in our merger with Schultz in May 2002 and our acquisition of thevarious fertilizer brands as comparedin December 2001.

24



        Operating income in the Lawn and Garden segment increased $9.7 million, or 29.7%, to $42.4 million for the Company'snine months ended September 30, 2002 from $32.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. Operating income of this segment increased primarily due to our merger with Schultz, our acquisition of various fertilizer brands and strong growth in our Spectracide® brand. These increases were partially offset by lower sales volume and margins of various other products. Operating income in the Household segment increased $3.2 million, or 13.6%, to $26.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 from $23.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. Operating income of this segment increased primarily due to increases in sales of our Cutter® and Hot Shot® brands and in our private label products. Operating income in the Contract segment increased $1.1 million to $1.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 from $0.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. Operating income of this segment increased primarily due to sales of new products acquired in our merger with Schultz.

        Pro formaInterest Expense, Net.    Interest expense, net decreased $3.2 million, or 11.5%, to $24.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 from $27.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. The decrease in net interest expense was due to a decline in our average variable borrowing rate of 2.41 percentage points to 1.84% for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 from 4.25% for the nine months ended September 30, 2001, resulting from a general decline in variable borrowing rates. This decrease was also due to interest income from an increase in our average cash balances available for investment during the current period, partially offset by an increase in our average debt outstanding during the current period, both of which resulted from additional borrowings under our senior credit facility to finance our merger with Schultz.

        Income Tax Expense.    For the threenine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2002, the Company'sour effective income tax rate is 19.1%was 19.2%, which primarily reflects the estimated utilization of the goodwill deduction in fiscal year 2002 and tax benefits related to Pro Forma adjustments.2002. The goodwill deduction iswas related to the step up in tax basis that occurred in conjunction with the Company's Recapitalizationour recapitalization in 1999. This rate reflects the rate required to adjust the Company's annualour effective income tax rate to 19%, which is based on our current estimate of annual pre-tax earnings and the utilization of our goodwill deduction.

Pro Forma Financial Information

        On May 9, 2002, one of our wholly owned subsidiaries completed a merger with and into Schultz. As a result of the merger, Schultz became one of our wholly owned subsidiaries. The transaction was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, the results of operations of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed have been included in the consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition. Our fiscal year ends on December 31 while, prior to the merger, the fiscal year of Schultz ended on September 30. Our unaudited consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 have been combined below with the unaudited statements of operations of Schultz for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, for purposes of providing the unaudited combined pro forma Sixresults of operations after giving effect to the merger as if it had occurred on January 1, 2001. The unaudited combined results of operations were adjusted on a pro forma basis to illustrate the estimated effects of additional amortization expense on the acquired intangible assets, interest expense for borrowings to finance the transaction and the associated income tax benefit. The unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations are presented to illustrate the potential operating results that may possibly have been achieved had this transaction been completed as of the assumed date but do not purport to be indicative of the operating results of operations that would definitely have been achieved had this transaction been completed as of the assumed date or which may be obtained in the future.

25



        The following tables present the compilation of the unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 (dollars in thousands), followed by accompanying notes:

 
 Three Months Ended
September 30, 2002

 Unaudited Pro Forma Statement of Operations for the
Three Months Ended September 30, 2001

 
 
 United Industries
Historical (a)

 United Industries
Historical

 Schultz Company
Historical (g)

 Pro Forma
Adjustments

 Total
 
Sales before promotion expense $111,372 $60,541 $13,223 $ $73,764 
Promotion expense  10,695  4,748  438    5,186 
  
 
 
 
 
 
Net sales  100,677  55,793  12,785    68,578 
  
 
 
 
 
 
Operating costs and expenses:                
 Cost of goods sold  65,209  30,104  12,111    42,215 
 Selling, general and administrative expenses  27,567  16,970  3,505  196(b) 20,671 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 Total operating costs and expenses  92,776  47,074  15,616  196  62,886 
  
 
 
 
 
 
Operating income (loss)  7,901  8,719  (2,831) (196) 5,692 
Interest expense, net  7,386  8,407  115  493(c) 9,015 
  
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)  515  312  (2,946) (689) (3,323)
Income tax expense (benefit)  98  91  (1,116) (204)(d) (1,229)
  
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss) $417 $221 $(1,830)$(485)$(2,094)
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Unaudited Pro Forma Statement of Operations for the
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002

 
 United Industries
Historical (e)

 Schultz Company
1/1/02 to 5/8/02 (g)

 Pro Forma
Adjustments

 Total
Sales before promotion expense $471,392 $55,603 $ $526,995
Promotion expense  39,188  841    40,029
  
 
 
 
Net sales  432,204  54,762    486,966
  
 
 
 
Operating costs and expenses:            
 Cost of goods sold  274,683  41,200  (1,500)(f) 314,383
 Selling, general and administrative expenses  87,143  7,412  294(b) 94,849
  
 
 
 
 Total operating costs and expenses  361,826  48,612  (1,206) 409,232
  
 
 
 
Operating income  70,378  6,150  1,206  77,734
Interest expense, net  24,591  259  740(c) 25,590
  
 
 
 
Income before income tax expense  45,787  5,891  466  52,144
Income tax expense  8,788  2,620  92(d) 11,500
  
 
 
 
Net income $36,999 $3,271 $374 $40,644
  
 
 
 

26


 
 Unaudited Pro Forma Statement of Operations for the
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2001

 
 United Industries
Historical

 Schultz Company
Historical (g)

 Pro Forma
Adjustments

 Total
Sales before promotion expense $273,405 $84,651 $ $358,056
Promotion expense  23,046  1,468    24,514
  
 
 
 
Net sales  250,359  83,183    333,542
  
 
 
 
Operating costs and expenses:            
 Cost of goods sold  134,811  67,095    201,906
 Selling, general and administrative expenses  59,155  10,421  588(b) 70,164
  
 
 
 
 Total operating costs and expenses  193,966  77,516  588  272,070
  
 
 
 
Operating income (loss)  56,393  5,667  (588) 61,472
Interest expense, net  27,808  647  1,479(c) 29,934
  
 
 
 
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)  28,585  5,020  (2,067) 31,538
Income tax expense (benefit)  8,375  2,038  (608)(d) 9,805
  
 
 
 
Net income (loss) $20,210 $2,982 $(1,459)$21,733
  
 
 
 

Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Statements of Operations

(a)
Pro forma operating results for the three months ended September 30, 2002 are represented by our historical consolidated operating results, as the operating results of Schultz for the three months ended September 30, 2002 are included therein.

(b)
Represents amortization expense of intangible assets acquired in the merger. Intangible assets are being amortized over 25 years.

(c)
Represents incremental interest expense related to additional borrowings of $35.0 million under our Term Loan B to finance the merger. An effective interest rate of 6% was used.

(d)
Represents the income tax benefit associated with the adjustments in (b) and (c) above.

(e)
Our historical operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 include the operating results of Schultz from May 9, 2002, the date of merger.

(f)
Represents elimination of the inventory purchase accounting write-up recorded upon completion of the merger that may not have been recorded had the transaction occurred on January 1, 2001. A related adjustment of $0.3 million is included in income tax expense for the corresponding period.

(g)
The operating results of Schultz reflect similar seasonal characteristics as our operating results given the similarity of our products and sales seasons.

27


Pro Forma Three Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, 2002 comparedCompared to Pro Forma SixThree Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, 2001

        The following table sets forthpresents amounts and the percentage relationshippercentages of certainnet sales that items in the Company's unaudited Propro forma Statementsconsolidated statements of Operations to net salesoperations constitute for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and June 30, 2001:periods presented (dollars in thousands):

 
 June 30,
 
 
 2002
 2001
 
Net sales:     
 Value brands 81.2%82.6%
 Opening price point brands 18.8%17.4%
  
 
 
Total net sales 100.0%100.0%
Operating costs and expenses:     
 Cost of goods sold 64.5%60.3%
 Selling, general and administrative expenses 17.4%18.7%
  
 
 
Total operating costs and expenses 81.9%79.0%
  
 
 
Operating income 18.1%21.0%
Interest expense 4.7%7.8%
  
 
 
Income before provision for income taxes 13.4%13.2%
Income tax expense 3.0%4.2%
  
 
 
Net income 10.4%9.0%
  
 
 

22


 
 Three Months Ended September 30,
 
 
 2002
 2001
 
 
 (unaudited)

 (unaudited)

 
Net sales by segment:           
 Lawn and Garden $64,465 64.0%$37,891 55.3%
 Household  29,406 29.2% 24,101 35.1%
 Contract  6,806 6.8% 6,586 9.6%
  
 
 
 
 
 Total net sales  100,677 100.0% 68,578 100.0%
  
 
 
 
 
Operating costs and expenses:           
 Cost of goods sold  65,209 64.8% 42,215 61.6%
 Selling, general and administrative expenses  27,567 27.4% 20,671 30.1%
  
 
 
 
 
 Total operating costs and expenses  92,776 92.2% 62,886 91.7%
  
 
 
 
 
Operating income by segment:           
 Lawn and Garden  1,372 1.4% 351 0.5%
 Household  5,963 5.9% 4,869 7.1%
 Contract  566 0.5% 472 0.7%
  
 
 
 
 
 Total operating income  7,901 7.8% 5,692 8.3%
Interest expense, net  7,386 7.3% 9,015 13.1%
  
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)  515 0.5% (3,323)-4.8%
Income tax expense (benefit)  98 0.1% (1,229)-1.8%
  
 
 
 
 
 Net income (loss) $417 0.4%$(2,094)-3.0%
  
 
 
 
 

        Pro formaForma Net Sales.    NetPro forma net sales represent gross sales less any applicable customer discounts from list price, customer returns and promotion expense through cooperative programs with retailers. Pro forma net sales increased 45.8%$32.1 million, or 46.8%, to $386.3$100.7 million for the sixthree months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2002 from $265.0$68.6 million for the sixthree months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2001. The increase, primarily in our Lawn and Garden segment, was driven by a combination of offsetting factors including:

        Net sales of the Company's value brands increased 45.1% to $311.3$64.5 million for the sixthree months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2002 from $214.5$37.9 million for the sixthree months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2001. SalesPro forma net sales of this segment increased due to increases in sales of Schultz, fertilizer and Spectracide® products. Pro forma net sales in the Household segment increased $5.3 million, or 22.0%, to $29.4 million for the sixthree months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2002 from $24.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2001. Pro forma net sales of fertilizer brands was $79.7 million. Remaining increase in sales isthis segment increased primarily due to Spectracide products at mass merchants.

        Netincreases in sales of opening price pointour Cutter® and Hot Shot® brands and in our private label products. Pro forma net sales in the Contract segment increased 48.8%$0.2 million, or 3.0%, to $75.0$6.8 million for the sixthree months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2002 from $50.4$6.6 million for the sixthree months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2001. Sales for the six months ended June 30, 2002 of fertilizer brands was $31.0 million. The additional sales from fertilizer brands was offset by retailers taking delivery of inventory closer to consumer take-away and overall reduction of inventory levels at retail.

        Pro formaForma Gross Profit.    GrossPro forma gross profit increased 30.2%$9.1 million, or 34.5%, to $137.1$35.5 million for the sixthree months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2002 compared to $105.3from $26.4 million for the sixthree months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2001. The increase in pro forma gross profit was primarily driven by the fertilizer brands recently acquired and partlydue to continued increases in

28



sales, coupled with favorable materials pricingcosts of key ingredients. As a percentage of pro forma net sales, pro forma gross profit decreased to 35.5%35.2% for the sixthree months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2002 as compared to 39.7%from 38.4% for the sixthree months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2001. The decrease in pro forma gross profit as a percentage of pro forma net sales was primarily due to theincreased sales of our fertilizer brands and Schultz products acquired, which have lower margins that are lower than the margins of the Company'sour other mix of products.

        Pro formaForma Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.    Selling,Pro forma selling, general and administrative expenses include all costs associated with the selling and distribution of product, product registrations, and administrative functions such as finance, information systems and human resources. Pro forma selling, general and administrative expenses increased 35.9%$6.9 million, or 33.3%, to $67.3$27.6 million for the sixthree months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2002 from $49.5$20.7 million for the sixthree months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2001. The majority of the increase was related to supporting increased sales, especially of our Shultz and fertilizer brands. As a percentage of pro forma net sales, pro forma selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to 27.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2002 from 30.1% for the three months ended September 30, 2001. The decrease was primarily due to additional sales related to the fertilizer brands, with a lesser corresponding increase in selling, general and administrative expenses.

        Pro Forma Operating Income.    Pro forma operating income increased $2.2 million, or 38.6%, to $7.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002 from $5.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2001. The increase was due to the factors described above. As a percentage of pro forma net sales, pro forma operating income decreased to 7.8% for the three months ended September 30, 2002 from 8.3% for the three months ended September 30, 2001. The decrease was primarily in our Lawn and Garden segment due to lower margins on our Schultz and fertilizer products.

        Pro forma operating income in the Lawn and Garden segment increased $1.0 million to $1.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002 from $0.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2001. Pro forma operating income of this segment increased primarily due to increases in sales of Schultz, fertilizer and Spectracide® products. Pro forma operating income in the Household segment increased $1.1 million, or 22.9%, to $6.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002 from $4.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2001. Pro forma operating income of this segment increased due to increases in sales of our Cutter® and Hot Shot® brands and in our private label products. Pro forma operating income in the Contract segment increased $0.1 million, or 20.0%, to $0.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002 from $0.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2001.

29



Pro Forma Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002 Compared to Pro Forma Nine Months Ended September 30, 2001

        The following table presents amounts and the percentages of net sales that items in the pro forma consolidated statements of operations constitute for the periods presented (dollars in thousands):

 
 Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
 
 2002
 2001
 
 
 (unaudited)

 (unaudited)

 
Net sales by segment:           
 Lawn and Garden $362,737 74.5%$215,268 64.5%
 Household  98,057 20.1% 93,468 28.0%
 Contract  26,172 5.4% 24,806 7.5%
  
 
 
 
 
 Total net sales  486,966 100.0% 333,542 100.0%
  
 
 
 
 
Operating costs and expenses:           
 Cost of goods sold  314,383 64.6% 201,906 60.5%
 Selling, general and administrative expenses  94,849 19.4% 70,164 21.0%
  
 
 
 
 
 Total operating costs and expenses  409,232 84.0% 272,070 81.5%
  
 
 
 
 
Operating income by segment:           
 Lawn and Garden  48,943 10.1% 36,006 10.8%
 Household  26,813 5.5% 23,591 7.1%
 Contract  1,978 0.4% 1,875 0.6%
  
 
 
 
 
 Total operating income  77,734 16.0% 61,472 18.5%
Interest expense, net  25,590 5.3% 29,934 9.0%
  
 
 
 
 
Income before income tax expense  52,144 10.7% 31,538 9.5%
Income tax expense  11,500 2.4% 9,805 2.9%
  
 
 
 
 
 Net income $40,644 8.3%$21,733 6.6%
  
 
 
 
 

        Pro Forma Net Sales.    Pro forma net sales represent gross sales less any applicable customer discounts from list price, customer returns and promotion expense through cooperative programs with retailers. Pro forma net sales increased $153.5 million, or 46.0%, to $487.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 from $333.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. The increase, primarily in our Lawn and Garden segment, was due to increases in sales of specific product lines described further below. This increase was partially offset by an increase in promotion expense and retailers maintaining lower inventory levels.

        Pro forma net sales in the Lawn and Garden segment increased $147.4 million, or 68.5%, to $362.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 from $215.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. Pro forma net sales of this segment increased due to increases in sales of Schultz, fertilizer and Spectracide® products. Pro forma net sales in the Household segment increased $4.6 million, or 4.9%, to $98.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 from $93.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. Pro forma net sales of this segment increased primarily due to increases in sales of our Cutter® and Hot Shot® brands and in our private label products. Pro forma net sales in the Contract segment increased $1.4 million, or 5.6%, to $26.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 from $24.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001.

        Pro Forma Gross Profit.    Pro forma gross profit increased $40.9 million, or 31.1%, to $172.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 from $131.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. The increase in pro forma gross profit was primarily due to continued

30



increases in sales, coupled with favorable materials costs of key ingredients. As a percentage of pro forma net sales, pro forma gross profit decreased to 35.4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 from 39.5% for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. The decrease in pro forma gross profit as a percentage of pro forma net sales was primarily due to increased sales of our fertilizer brands which have lower margins than our other products.

        Pro Forma Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.    Pro forma selling, general and administrative expenses include all costs associated with the selling and distribution of product, product registrations, and administrative functions such as finance, information systems and human resources. Pro forma selling, general and administrative expenses increased $24.6 million, or 35.0%, to $94.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 from $70.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. The majority of the increase is related to supporting theincreased sales, especially of our Schultz and fertilizer brands acquired.brands. As a percentage of pro forma net sales, pro forma selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to 17.4%19.4% for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2002 from 18.7%21.0% for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2001. The overall decrease was primarily due to expenseadditional sales related to the recently acquired fertilizer brands, that do not requirewith a direct percentlesser corresponding increase in selling, general and administrative expenses of the Company. The Company has excluded the non-recurring $5.1 millionexpenses. Non-recurring change of control payments that were madetotaling $5.1 million paid to fivecertain members of Schultz management.management have been excluded from the pro forma financial information.

        Pro formaForma Operating Income.    OperatingPro forma operating income increased 25.2%$16.2 million, or 26.3%, to $69.8$77.7 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2002 from $55.8$61.5 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2001. The increase was due to the factors described above. As a percentage of pro forma net sales, pro forma operating income decreased to 18.1%16.0% for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2002 from 21.0%18.5% for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2001. The decrease was primarily driven by thein our Lawn and Garden segment due to lower margins of theon our Schultz and fertilizer brands as compared to the Company's other products.

        Pro forma Income Tax Expense.    Foroperating income in the sixLawn and Garden segment increased $12.9 million, or 35.8%, to $48.9 million for the nine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2002 from $36.0 million for the Company's effective income tax rate is 19.6%, which primarily reflects the estimated utilization of the goodwill deduction in fiscal year 2002 and tax benefits related tonine months ended September 30, 2001. Pro forma adjustments. The goodwill deduction is relatedoperating income of this segment increased due to increases in sales of Schultz, fertilizer and Spectracide® products. Pro forma operating income in the step upHousehold segment increased $3.2 million, or 13.6%, to $26.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 from $23.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. Pro forma operating income of this segment increased primarily due to increases in tax basis that occurred in conjunction with the Company's Recapitalization in 1999. This rate reflects the rate required to adjust the Company's annual effective income tax rate to 19%, which is based on our current estimate of annual pre-tax earnings and the utilizationsales of our goodwill deduction.Cutter® and Hot Shot® brands and in our private label products. Pro forma operating income in the Contract segment increased $0.1 million, or 5.3%, to $2.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 from $1.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001.

23



Liquidity and Capital Resources

        Historically, the Company hasOur principal liquidity requirements are for working capital, capital expenditures and debt service under our senior credit facility and senior subordinated notes. We have historically utilized internally generated fundscash flow and proceeds from borrowings under credit facilitiesand issuance of common and preferred stock to meet ongoing working capital and capital expenditure requirements. As a result of the Company's Recapitalizationour recapitalization in 1999, the Company haswe have significantly increased cash requirements for debt service relating to the Company's Senior Subordinated Notesour senior subordinated notes and Senior Credit Facility. As of December 31, 2001, the Companysenior credit facility. We had total debt outstanding, including obligations under capital leases, of $351.8 million. As$384.7 million as of JuneSeptember 30, 2002 the Company had total debt outstandingand $351.8 million as of $387.6 million. The Company will rely onDecember 31, 2001. We believe internally generated fundscash flow from operations and, to the extent necessary, proceeds from borrowings under the Company's Revolving Credit Facilityour revolving credit facility or from issuance of common and preferred stock will enable us to meet liquidity needs.anticipated requirements for working capital, capital expenditures and scheduled principal and interest payments for at least the next two years. However, we cannot ensure that sufficient cash flow will be generated from operations to repay the senior subordinated notes and

        The Company's Senior Credit Facility consists of:31

        The Company's Revolving Credit Facility clean-down obligations and Term Loan A maturereduce debt will be dependent upon our future performance, which in January 2005, and Term Loan B matures in January 2006. The Revolving Credit Facility isturn, will be subject to general economic conditions and to financial, business and other factors, including factors beyond our control. Because a clean-down period during which the aggregate amount outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility shall not exceed $10.0portion of our debt bears interest at floating rates, our financial condition is and will continue to be affected by changes in prevailing interest rates.

Operating Activities

        Cash flow provided by operating activities was approximately $60.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, consecutive days occurring2002 and $26.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. The increase in cash flows provided by operating activities was primarily due to an increase in net income from our expanded product line, coupled with changes in operating assets and liabilities, both of which resulted from our merger with Schultz in May 2002 and our acquisition of various fertilizer brands in December 2001. Net cash used by operating activities fluctuates during the period August 1year as the seasonal nature of our sales results in a significant increase in working capital, primarily accounts receivable and November 30 in each calendar year. The Company was in compliance with financial covenants at June 30, 2002. Whileinventory, during the Company does not expect being in non-compliance with financial covenants in the future, the effect of non-compliance with financial covenants would cause the Company to request an amendment to the Senior Credit Facility. The result of amending the Senior Credit Facility could cause a reduction in the limitfirst half of the Company's Revolving Credit Facilityyear, with the second and changes inthird quarters being heavy periods of cash collection. Our acquisition of various fertilizer brands and our merger with Schultz do not change the effective interest ratesseasonal nature of the Revolving Credit Facility.our working capital.

Investing Activities

        On May 9, 2002, the Companyone of our wholly owned subsidiaries completed a merger with Schultz.and into Schultz, manufacturesa manufacturer of horticultural products and specialty items, particularly for the indoor houseplant care segment of the market. Schultz also distributesmarket, and a distributor of charcoal, potting soil and soil conditioners. Schultz distributes its products mainlyare distributed primarily to retail outlets and nurseries throughout the United States and Canada. The transactionmerger was accounted for using purchase accounting.executed in order to achieve economies of scale and synergistic efficiencies. As a result of the merger, Schultz became one of our wholly owned subsidiaries. The total purchase price included cash payments of $38.1$38.3 million, including related acquisition costs, issuance of 0.6 million600,000 shares of Class A Voting Common Stockvoting common stock valued at $3.0 million and issuance of 0.6 million600,000 shares of Class B Non-Voting Common Stocknon-voting common stock valued at $3.0 million. In exchange for the Company's cash and Common Stock consideration, the Company received all of the outstanding shares of Schultz. The Company has preliminarily allocated 50% of the purchase price in excess of the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed to intangibles and 50% to goodwill. The merger included goodwill and other intangible assets of $38.1 million.

        The Company'sOur funding sources for the merger were as follows: (1)

        On June 14, 2002, the Company andwe consummated a strategic partnership with Bayer Corporation and Bayer Advanced, L.L.C. (Bayer) consummated the(together referred to herein as Bayer). The strategic partnership that the parties entered into on June 7, 2002. The strategic Partnership is built upon three key components: (1) The Company gainsallows us to gain access to certain Bayer active ingredient technologies through a Supply Agreement; (2) The Company performsAgreement and to perform certain merchandising services for Bayer through aan In-Store Services Agreement; and (3)Service Agreement. In connection with the strategic partnership, Bayer obtainsacquired a 9.3% minority ownership in theinterest, approximately 9.3% of our issued and outstanding Common Stock shares of the Companycommon stock, under the terms of thean Exchange Agreement in exchange for promissory notes due to Bayer from Pursell Industries, Inc. (Pursell) and the execution of the twoSupply and In-Store Service Agreements. Under the requirements of the agreements, previously mentioned.Bayer will make payments to us which total $5.0 million annually for the next seven years.

32



        Under the terms of the Exchange Agreement, the Company haswe have the right to repurchase the shares exchanged withissued to Bayer upon the termination of the In-Store ServicesService Agreement. Termination of the In-Store ServicesService Agreement can occur with or without cause. If the Company elects to terminate the In-Store Services Agreement without cause, it must give Bayer sixty days notice of its intention to terminate the In-Store Services Agreement. If the Company exercises its repurchase option, it will repurchase its shares based on a price as determined by the In-Store Services Agreement. It is generally believed that the repurchase price per share would represent the fair market value of the shares at the time such repurchase option is exercised.

In exchange for the promissory notes received from Bayer and the Supply and In-Store agreements, the Company issued to Bayer 3.1 million shares of Class A Voting Common Stock valued at $15.4 million and 3.1 million shares of Class B Non-Voting Common Stock valued at $15.4 million. The promissory notes received from Bayer are due from Pursell Industries, Inc. The Company has reserved for the entire face value of the promissory notes based on an independent third party valuation.

        In addition, based on an independent third party valuation, the Company has assigned the $30.7 million fair value of the Common Stock exchanged with Bayer as follows (in millions):

Common Stock subsciption receivable $27.3 
Supply Agreement  5.7 
Repurchase Option  2.6 
In-Store Services Agreement  (4.9)
  
 
  $30.7 
  
 

        Under the requirements of the agreements, Bayer will make payments which total $5.0 million annually for the next seven years, the present value of which equates to the value assigned to the Common Stock subscription receivable, which is reflected in the equity section of the Company's balance sheet at June 30, 2002. The Common Stock subscription receivable will be repaid in 28 quarterly installments of $1.3 million, one of which was received at closing on June 17, 2002. The difference between the value ascribed to the Common Stock subscription and the installment payments will be reflected as interest income in the Company's Statement of Operations over the next seven years.

Bayer has the right to put the shares received from the Companyus back to the Companyus under the terms of the Exchange Agreement. Bayer can terminate the Exchange Agreement within the first 36 months if the Company failswe fail to meet certain performance guidelines as established in the Exchange Agreement. In conjunction with the termination, Bayer can put the Company's common stock back to the Company within 30 days of the termination of the Exchange Agreement at a price as determined by the Exchange Agreement. It is generally believed that the put price per share would represent the fair market value of the shares at the time such put option is exercised.

        TheIn exchange for the promissory notes received from Bayer and the execution of the Supply and In-Store Service Agreements, we issued to Bayer 3,072,000 shares of Class A voting common stock valued at $15.4 million and 3,072,000 shares of Class B non-voting common stock valued at $15.4 million. We reserved for the entire face value of the Supply Agreementpromissory notes due to Bayer from Pursell as we did not believe they were collectible and an independent third party valuation did not ascribe any value to them.

        On October 3, 2002, we signed an asset purchase agreement to acquire certain assets from Pursell, which renamed itself U.S. Fertilizer subsequent to the liability associatedagreement, for a cash purchase price of $12.1 million and forgiveness of the Pursell promissory notes described above, subject to final purchase price adjustments. The assets acquired included certain inventory, equipment at two of Pursell's facilities and real estate at one of the two facilities. The facilities acquired from Pursell, located in Orrville, Ohio and Sylacauga, Alabama, previously fulfilled, and are expected to continue to fulfill, over half of the Company's fertilizer manufacturing requirements.

        Also on October 3, 2002, we signed a tolling agreement with Pursell whereby Pursell will supply us with the In-Store Services Agreement willremainder of our fertilizer needs. The tolling agreement requires us to be amortized overresponsible for certain raw materials, capital expenditures and other related costs for Pursell to manufacture and supply us with fertilizer products. The agreement does not require a minimum volume purchase of Pursell's manufacturing services but does provide for a fixed monthly payment of $0.7 million through the patternterm of the tolling agreement which expires on September 30, 2007. The agreement provides us with early termination rights without penalty. In addition, beginning on March 1, 2004 and on each anniversary thereafter, the fixed payment is subject to certain increases for labor, materials, inflation and other reasonable costs as outlined in the tolling agreement.

Financing Activities

        Our senior credit facility consists of a $90.0 million revolving credit facility, of which no borrowings were outstanding at September 30, 2002; a $75.0 million Term Loan A, of which $32.3 million was outstanding at September 30, 2002; and a $215.0 million Term Loan B, of which $198.0 million was outstanding at September 30, 2002. Our revolving credit facility and Term Loan A mature on January 20, 2005 and Term Loan B matures on January 20, 2006. The revolving credit facility is subject to a clean-down period induring which economic benefitsthe aggregate amount outstanding under the Supplyrevolving credit facility shall not exceed $10.0 million for 30 consecutive days during the period August 1 and November 30 in each calendar year. At September 30, 2002, the clean-down period had been completed and no amounts were outstanding under the revolving credit facility, nor were there any compensating balance requirements. Our senior credit facility agreement contains restrictive affirmative, negative and financial covenants. Affirmative and negative covenants place restrictions on levels of investments, indebtedness, insurance and capital expenditures. Financial covenants require the maintenance of certain financial ratios at defined levels. At September 30, 2002, we were in compliance with all covenants. While we do not anticipate an event of non-compliance in the immediate future, the effect of non-compliance would require us to request a waiver or an amendment to our senior credit facility. The result of amending our senior credit facility could result in changes to our borrowing

2533



Agreement are consumedcapacity or the effective interest rates of the senior credit facility. Under the covenants, interest rates on the revolving credit facility, Term Loan A and the obligationsTerm Loan B range from 2.50% to 4.00% above LIBOR depending on certain financial ratios. Unused commitments under the In-Store Service Agreementrevolving credit facility are fulfilled.subject to a 0.5% annual commitment fee. LIBOR was 1.82% at September 30, 2002.

        On February 13, 2002, we received approval from our banking syndicate to amend our senior credit facility. The Company will amortize the asset associated with the Supply Agreementamendment increased Term Loan B from $150.0 million to cost of goods sold and currently anticipates the benefit will be recognized over a three to five year period. The Company will amortize the obligation associated with the In-Store Services Agreement to revenues and currently anticipates the obligation will be recognized over the seven-year life of the agreement. The valuation also determined that a repurchase option owned by the Company under the agreements has value. The effect of the repurchase option is reflected as a reduction to the Company's equity. This amount will be recorded as a component of additional paid-in capital upon the exercise of the option or its expiration.

        The Company's principal liquidity requirements are for working capital, capital expenditures and debt service under the Senior Credit Facility and the notes. Cash flow provided by operating activities was approximately $9.5$180.0 million and $3.8provided additional capital expenditure flexibility. On May 8, 2002, we received approval from our banking syndicate to amend our senior credit facility. The amendment increased Term Loan B from $180.0 million for the six months ended June 30,to $215.0 million, increased our revolving credit facility from $80.0 million to $90.0 million and provided additional capital expenditure flexibility. On November 4, 2002, we received approval from our banking syndicate to amend our senior credit facility. The amendment provided us with greater flexibility with regard to derivative and 2001, respectively. The increase in cash flows provided by operating activities primarily relates increase in net income from the fertilizer brands acquired December 2001. The Company sources the products it sells under the acquired fertilizer brands from Pursell Industries, Inc. The Company's current agreement with Pursell Industries, Inc., does not require the Company to maintain inventory. Net cash used by operating activities fluctuates during the year as the seasonal nature of the Company's sales results in a significant increase in working capital primarily accounts receivable and inventory during the first half of the year, with the second and third quarters being significant cash collection periods. The acquisition of the fertilizer brands and Schultz Company does not change the seasonal nature of the Company's working capital.hedging activities.

        The fertilizer brands formerly owned byWe have not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements or licensedobligations other than operating leases, which are not material to Pursell Industries, Inc, complement the Company's consumer lawn, garden and insect control products. As noted above, Pursell Industries, Inc., continues to manufacture, warehouse and distribute the fertilizer products for the Company under a long-term agreement. The Company does not believe that the ability to source the fertilizer brands will be a concern in the future.our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

Capital Expenditures

        Capital expenditures are relatedrelate to the enhancement of the Company'sour existing facilities and the construction of additional capacity for production and distribution capacity.distribution. Cash used for capital expenditures for the remainder of fiscal 2002 is expected to be less than $8.5 million. During the sixnine months Juneended September 30, 2002, the Company also incurred $37.6we used $38.3 million of cash outlay related to the Schultz merger.

        The Company believes that cash flow from operations, togetherpartially finance our merger with available borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility, will be adequate to meet the anticipated requirements for working capital, capital expenditures and scheduled principal and interest payments for at least the next two years. However, the Company cannot ensure that sufficient cash flow will be generated from operations to repay the notes and amounts outstanding under the Senior Credit Facility at maturity without requiring additional financing. The Company's ability to meet debt service and clean-down obligations and reduce debt will be dependent on the Company's future performance, which in turn, will be subject to general economic conditions and to financial, business and other factors, including factors beyond the Company's control. Because a portion of the Company's debt bears interest at floating rates, the Company's financial condition is and will continue to be affected by changes in prevailing interest rates.

        The Company has not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements or obligations.Schultz.

SeasonalityCertain Trends and Uncertainties

        The Company'sOur business is highly seasonal because the Company'sour products are used primarily in the spring and summer. For the past two years, approximately 75% of the Company'sour net sales have occurred in the first and second quarters. The Company'sOur working capital needs, and correspondingly the Company'sour borrowings, peak near the end of the Company's first quarter.

26



Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

        On July 29,In June 2002, the Financial Accounting standardsStandards Board (FASB or the "Board") issued FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No., 146, (SFAS 146) "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal".Disposal Activities." SFAS No. 146 addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)."

        This Statement applies to SFAS No. 146 requires that a liability for costs associated with an exit activity 1) that does not involve an entity newly acquired in a business combination or with a disposal activity covered by FASB Statementbe recognized when the liability is incurred rather than when a company commits to such an activity and also establishes fair value as the objective for initial measurement of the liability. SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets". Those costs include, but are not limited to, the following:

        FAS 146 does not apply to costs associated with the retirement of a long-lived asset covered by FASB Statement No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations". The provisions of SFAS 146 are effectivewill be adopted for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002, with early application encouraged. Since SFAS 146 is required to be implemented2002. Adoption will not have a material impact on a prospective basis and previously issuedour consolidated financial statements can not be restated, the impact of SFAS 146 on the Company's financial statements is not expected to be material.statements.


Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Interest RateRates

        The Company isWe are exposed to market risks relating to changes in interest rates. The Company doesWe do not enter into derivatives or other financial instrumentshedging arrangements for trading or speculative purposes. The Company entersWe periodically enter into financial instruments to manage and reduce the impact of changes in interest rates. The Company doesAt September 30, 2002, we did not currently haveutilize any derivative instruments issued to manage interest rate exposure.or hedging instruments.

        Interest rangesrates on our revolving credit facility, Term Loan A and Term Loan B range from 2502.50% to 400 basis points4.00% above LIBOR depending on certain financial ratios. LIBOR was 1.84%1.82% on JuneSeptember 30, 2002.

34



Exchange RateRates

        The Company doesWe do not currently use derivativederivatives or other hedging instruments to hedge againstmanage or reduce the risk of foreign currency exposures related to transactions denominated in other than the Company's functional currency. Substantiallyexposure as nearly all of our foreign currency transactions are denominated in United States dollars.

Commodity PricePrices

        The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge its exposures to changes in commodity prices. The Company utilizesWe utilize various commodity and specialty chemicals in itsour production process. Purchasing procedures and arrangements with major vendors and customers serve to mitigate itsour exposure to price changes in commodity and specialty chemicals. In addition, we periodically enter into derivative or hedging agreements to manage and reduce the impact of changes in raw materials price fluctuations. We do not enter into derivatives or other hedging arrangements for trading or speculative purposes. As of September 30, 2002, we did not utilize any derivative or hedging instruments.

27
Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

        Our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-14(c) and 15-d-14(c)) as of a date (the Evaluation Date) within 90 days before the filing date of this report, have concluded that as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in bringing to their attention on a timely basis material information relating to us and our consolidated subsidiaries required to be included in our periodic filings under the Exchange Act.

Changes in Internal Controls

        There were no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the Evaluation Date.

35



Part II

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.Proceedings

        The Company hasWe have no reportable legal proceedings in the current period. We are involved from time to time in routine legal matters and other claims incidental to our business. When it appears probable in management's judgment that we will incur monetary damages or other costs in connection with such claims and proceedings, and such costs can be reasonably estimated, liabilities are recorded in the consolidated financial statements and charges are made against earnings. We believe that the resolution of such routine matters and other incidental claims, taking into account established reserves and insurance, will not have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.


Item 2. Changes in Securities.Securities and Use of Proceeds

Merger with Schultz Company

        None.On May 9, 2002, one of our wholly owned subsidiaries completed a merger with and into Schultz, a manufacturer of horticultural products and specialty items, particularly for the indoor houseplant care segment of the market, and a distributor of charcoal, potting soil and soil conditioners. The total purchase price included cash payments of $38.3 million, including related acquisition costs, issuance of 600,000 shares of Class A voting common stock valued at $3.0 million and issuance of 600,000 shares of Class B non-voting common stock valued at $3.0 million.

        Our funding sources for the merger were as follows: an additional $35.0 million add-on to Term Loan B of our senior credit facility, the issuance of 1,069,000 shares of Class A voting common stock to UIC Holdings, L.L.C. for $8.5 million and the issuance of 1,069,000 shares of Class B non-voting common stock to UIC Holdings, L.L.C. for $8.5 million. The issuance of shares to UIC Holdings, L.L.C. was a condition precedent to the amendment of our senior credit facility.

        The issuance of the shares of our common stock in connection with the transactions described above was exempt from the registration provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act for transactions not involving a public offering, based on the fact that the common stock was offered and sold to accredited investors who had access to our financial and other relevant data.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.Strategic Partnership with Bayer Corporation

        None.

Item 4. SubmissionOn June 14, 2002, we consummated a strategic partnership with Bayer. In connection with the strategic partnership, Bayer acquired a minority ownership interest, approximately 9.3% of Mattersour issued and outstanding common stock, under the terms of an Exchange Agreement in exchange for promissory notes due to Bayer from Pursell and the execution of a Vote of Security Holders.Supply Agreement and In-Store Service Agreement.

        No mattersIn exchange for the promissory notes received from Bayer and the execution of the Supply and In-Store Service Agreements, we issued to Bayer 3,072,000 shares of Class A voting common stock valued at $15.4 million and 3,072,000 shares of Class B non-voting common stock valued at $15.4 million. We reserved for the entire face value of the promissory notes due to Bayer from Pursell as we did not believe they were submitted.

Item 5. Other Information.collectible and an independent third party valuation did not ascribe any value to them. In connection with the asset purchase agreement consummated with Pursell on October 3, 2002, the promissory notes described above that were due to us from Pursell were forgiven.

        None.The issuance of the shares of our common stock in connection with the transaction described above was exempt from the registration provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act for transactions not involving a public offering, based on the fact that

36



the common stock was offered and sold to an accredited investor who had access to our financial and other relevant data.


Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

(a)
Exhibits

Exhibit
Number

Exhibit Description

10.2710.35 Amendment No. 57 dated as May 8,of September 30, 2002 to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of March 24, 1999 (as amended) among the Company, certain banks, financial institutions and other institutional lenders party thereto, Bank of America, N.A. (formerly known as NationsBank, N.A.), Banc of America Securities L.L.C. (formerly known as NationsBanc Montgomery Securities L.L.C.) and Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce.

10.28


Exchange Agreement dated as of June 14, 2002, among Bayer Corporation, an Indiana corporation, Bayer Advanced L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, and the Company.(1)

10.29


In-Store Service Agreement dated as of June 7, 2002 among the Company, Bayer Corporation, an Indiana corporation, and Bayer Advanced L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company.(1)

10.30


Supply Agreement dated as of June 14, 2002 between Bayer Corporation, an Indiana corporation, and the Company.(1)

10.3110.36

 

Amendment No. 68 dated as June 14,of November 4, 2002 to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of March 24, 1999 (as amended) among the Company, certain banks, financial institutions and other institutional lenders party thereto, Bank of America, N.A. (formerly known as NationsBank, N.A.), Banc of America Securities L.L.C. (formerly known as NationsBanc Montgomery Securities L.L.C.) and Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce.
(b)
ReportReports on Form 8-K
A current report on Form 8-K relating to the merger with Schultz Company was filed on May 23, 2002 pursuant to Item 2. Financial statements were subsequently filed on Form 8K/A on July 23, 2002 Pursuant to Item 7.
A current report on Form 8-K relating to the strategic alliance with Bayer CorpScience was filed on June 28, 2002 Pursuant to Item 5. No financial statements were filed.

(1)
Certain information in this exhibit has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to a confidential treatment request under Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

28        None.




SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

  UNITED INDUSTRIES CORPORATION, registrant

Dated: August 14,November 12, 2002

 

By:


/s/  
DANIEL J. JOHNSTON      
Name:Daniel J. Johnston
Title:Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

38



CERTIFICATIONS

        I, Robert L. Caulk, certify that:


Dated: November 12, 2002By:Name:  /s/  ROBERT L. CAULK      
Robert L. Caulk
President and
Chief Executive Officer

39


        I, Daniel J. Johnston, certify that:


Dated: November 12, 2002By:/s/  DANIEL J. JOHNSTON      
Daniel J. Johnston
Title:    Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer


QuickLinks

PART 1 FINANCIAL INFORMATION Item 1. Financial Statements
UNITED INDUSTRIES CORPORATION BALANCE SHEETS JUNE 30, 2002 AND 2001, AND DECEMBER 31, 2001 (Dollars in thousands) (Unaudited)
UNITED INDUSTRIES CORPORATION STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002 AND 2001 (Dollars in thousands) (Unaudited)
UNITED INDUSTRIES CORPORATION STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002 AND 2001 (Dollars in thousands) (Unaudited)
UNITED INDUSTRIES CORPORATION NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Dollars in thousands) (Unaudited)
Part II
OTHER INFORMATION
SIGNATURES