UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 
FORM 10-Q
 
[X]QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 for the quarterly period ended March 31, 20142015
OR
[   ]TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 for the transition period from _________ to ___________

Commission File

Number

Registrant; State of Incorporation;

Address and Telephone Number

IRS Employer

Identification No.

   
1-11459

PPL Corporation

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

(Pennsylvania)

Two North Ninth Street

Allentown, PA 18101-1179

(610) 774-5151

23-2758192
   
1-329441-905

PPL Energy Supply, LLC

Electric Utilities Corporation

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

(Delaware)

(Pennsylvania)

Two North Ninth Street

Allentown, PA 18101-1179

(610) 774-5151

23-3074920
1-905
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
(Pennsylvania)
Two North Ninth Street
Allentown, PA  18101-1179
(610) 774-5151

23-0959590
   
333-173665

LG&E and KU Energy LLC

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

(Kentucky)

220 West Main Street

Louisville, KY 40202-1377

(502) 627-2000

20-0523163
   
1-2893

Louisville Gas and Electric Company

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

(Kentucky)

220 West Main Street

Louisville, KY 40202-1377

(502) 627-2000

61-0264150
   
1-3464

Kentucky Utilities Company

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

(Kentucky and Virginia)

One Quality Street

Lexington, KY 40507-1462

(502) 627-2000

61-0247570





Indicate by check mark whether the registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.


 PPL Corporation
Yes X   
No
PPL Energy Supply, LLC
Yes  X   
No        
 
 PPL Electric Utilities Corporation
Yes X   
No
 
 LG&E and KU Energy LLC
Yes  X   
No
 
 Louisville Gas and Electric Company
Yes X  
No
 
 Kentucky Utilities Company
Yes X   
No
 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrants have submitted electronically and posted on their corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were required to submit and post such files).


 PPL Corporation
Yes X   
No
PPL Energy Supply, LLC
Yes  X   
No        
 
 PPL Electric Utilities Corporation
Yes X   
No
 
 LG&E and KU Energy LLC
Yes X   
No
 
 Louisville Gas and Electric Company
Yes X   
No
 
 Kentucky Utilities Company
Yes X   
No
 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrants are large accelerated filers, accelerated filers, non-accelerated filers, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


  

Large accelerated

filer

Accelerated

filer

Non-accelerated

filer

Smaller reporting

company

 PPL Corporation[ X ][     ][     ][     ]
PPL Energy Supply, LLC[     ][     ][ X     ][     ]
 PPL Electric Utilities Corporation[     ][     ][ X ][     ]
 LG&E and KU Energy LLC[     ][     ][ X ][     ]
 Louisville Gas and Electric Company[     ][     ][ X ][     ]
 Kentucky Utilities Company[     ][     ][ X ][     ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrants are shell companies (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).


 PPL Corporation
Yes
No X   
PPL Energy Supply, LLC
Yes        
No  X   
 
 PPL Electric Utilities Corporation
Yes
No X   
 
 LG&E and KU Energy LLC
Yes
No X   
 
 Louisville Gas and Electric Company
Yes
No X   
 
 Kentucky Utilities Company
Yes
No X   
 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.


 PPL CorporationCommon stock, $0.01 par value, 631,744,500668,107,248 shares outstanding at April 25, 2014.
PPL Energy Supply, LLCPPL Corporation indirectly holds all of the membership interests in PPL Energy Supply, LLC.30, 2015.
   
 PPL Electric Utilities CorporationCommon stock, no par value, 66,368,056 shares outstanding and all held by PPL Corporation at April 25, 2014.30, 2015.
   
 LG&E and KU Energy LLCPPL Corporation directly holds all of the membership interests in LG&E and KU Energy LLC.
   
 Louisville Gas and Electric CompanyCommon stock, no par value, 21,294,223 shares outstanding and all held by LG&E and KU Energy LLC at April 25, 2014.30, 2015.
   
 Kentucky Utilities CompanyCommon stock, no par value, 37,817,878 shares outstanding and all held by LG&E and KU Energy LLC at April 25, 2014.30, 2015.

This document is available free of charge at the Investor Center on PPL Corporation's website at www.pplweb.com. However, information on this website does not constitute a part of this Form 10-Q.




PPL CORPORATION

PPL ENERGY SUPPLY, LLC

PPL ELECTRIC UTILITIES CORPORATION

LG&E ANDand KU ENERGYEnergy LLC

LOUISVILLE GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
KENTUCKY UTILITIES COMPANY

Louisville Gas and Electric Company

Kentucky Utilities Company

FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCHMarch 31, 2014



2015

Table of Contents


This combined Form 10-Q is separately filed by the following Registrants in their individual capacity: PPL Corporation, PPL Energy Supply, LLC, PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company. Information contained herein relating to any individual Registrant is filed by such Registrant solely on its own behalf, and no Registrant makes any representation as to information relating to any other Registrant, except that information under "Forward-Looking Information" relating to subsidiaries of PPL Corporation is also attributed to PPL Corporation and information relating to the subsidiaries of LG&E and KU Energy LLC is also attributed to LG&E and KU Energy LLC.


Beginning in the first quarter of 2015, PPL Energy Supply, LLC is filing a separate Form 10-Q.

Unless otherwise specified, references in this Report, individually, to PPL Corporation, PPL Energy Supply, LLC, PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company are references to such entities directly or to one or more of their subsidiaries, as the case may be, the financial results of which subsidiaries are consolidated into such Registrants in accordance with GAAP. This presentation has been applied where identification of particular subsidiaries is not material to the matter being disclosed, and to conform narrative disclosures to the presentation of financial information on a consolidated basis.

  Page
  
1
PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION 
 Item 1.  Financial Statements 
  PPL Corporation and Subsidiaries 
 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income3
   34
   45
   56
   6
8
PPL Energy Supply, LLC and Subsidiaries
9
10
11
12
14
  PPL Electric Utilities Corporation and Subsidiaries 
 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income10
   1611
   1712
   18
2014
  LG&E and KU Energy LLC and Subsidiaries 
 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income16
   2217
   2318
   24
2620




  Louisville Gas and Electric Company 
   2822
   2923
   3024
   3226
  Kentucky Utilities Company 
   3428
   3529
   3630
   3832

 Combined Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited) 
  3933
  3933
  34
4.   Earnings Per Share35
5.   Income Taxes36
6.   Utility Rate Regulation37
7.   Financing Activities40
  41
42
  4344
  4745
  4958
  49
50
64
6559
  59
14. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities65
  7275
  8375
  8375
  83
8476
  8677
 Item 2.  Combined Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 
  80
Introduction80
Business Strategy82
Financial and Operational Developments83
PPL Corporation and Subsidiaries - Earnings83
2015 Outlook84
Other Financial and Operational Developments85
Results of Operations87
   87
89
90
90
90
91
93
9488
   102
10496
   10697
   10799
   109100
  101
Liquidity and Capital Resources101
Risk Management106
Foreign Currency Translation110
   110
   115110
   119110
  New Accounting Guidance119114
  119
119
122
122114




 123115
 123115
PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION 
 123115
 123115
 123115
 124116
126118
127119
 
133124
 
145134

































(THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY.)



GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS


PPL Corporation and its subsidiaries


KU - Kentucky -Kentucky Utilities Company, a public utility subsidiary of LKE engaged in the regulated generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity, primarily in Kentucky.


LG&E -Louisville Gas and Electric Company, a public utility subsidiary of LKE engaged in the regulated generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity and the distribution and sale of natural gas in Kentucky.

LKE


LKE- LG&E and KU Energy LLC, a subsidiary of PPL and the parent of LG&E, KU and other subsidiaries.

LKS


LKS- LG&E and KU Services Company, a subsidiary of LKE that provides services to LKE and its subsidiaries.

PPL- PPL Corporation, the parent holding company of PPL Electric, PPL Energy Funding, PPL Capital Funding, LKE and other subsidiaries.


PPL Brunner Island - PPL Brunner Island, LLC, a subsidiary of PPL Generation that owns generating operations in Pennsylvania.


PPL Capital Funding - PPL Capital Funding, Inc., a financing subsidiary of PPL that provides financing for the operations of PPL and certain subsidiaries. Debt issued by PPL Capital Funding is guaranteed as to payment by PPL.


PPL Electric- PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, a public utility subsidiary of PPL engaged in the regulated transmission and distribution of electricity in its Pennsylvania service area and that provides electricity supply to its retail customers in this area as a PLR.


PPL Energy Funding - PPL Energy Funding Corporation, a subsidiary of PPL and the parent holding company of PPL Energy Supply, PPL Global and other subsidiaries.


PPL EnergyPlus - PPL EnergyPlus, LLC, a subsidiary of PPL Energy Supply that markets and trades wholesale and retail electricity and gas, and supplies energy and energy services in competitive markets.


PPL Energy Supply - PPL Energy Supply, LLC, a subsidiary of PPL Energy Funding and the parent company of PPL Generation, PPL EnergyPlus and other subsidiaries.

PPL EU Services


- PPL EU Services Corporation, a subsidiary of PPL that, beginning in 2015, provides support services and corporate functions such as financial, supply chain, human resources and information technology services primarily to PPL Electric and its affiliates.

PPL Generation - PPL Generation, LLC, a subsidiary of PPL Energy Supply that owns and operates U.S. generating facilities through various subsidiaries.


PPL Global - PPL Global, LLC, a subsidiary of PPL Energy Funding that, primarily through its subsidiaries, owns and operates WPD, PPL's regulated electricity distribution businesses in the U.K.


PPL Montana - PPL Montana, LLC, an indirect subsidiary of PPL Generation that generates electricity for wholesale sales in Montana and the Pacific Northwest.


PPL Montour - PPL Montour, LLC, a subsidiary of PPL Generation that owns generating operations in Pennsylvania.


PPL Services - PPL Services Corporation, a subsidiary of PPL that provides services to PPL and its subsidiaries.


PPL Susquehanna - PPL Susquehanna, LLC, a subsidiary of PPL Generation that owns a nuclear-powered generating station.


PPL WEMWPD Ltd - PPL WEM Holdings Limited (formerly PPL WEM Holdings plc), an indirect U.K. subsidiary of PPL Global. PPL WEM indirectly owns both WPD (East Midlands)Ltd holds a liability for a closed defined benefit pension plan and a receivable with WPD (West Midlands).


Ltd.

PPL WW - PPL WW Holdings Limited, an indirect U.K. subsidiary of PPL Global.  PPL WW Holdings indirectly owns WPD (South Wales) and WPD (South West).


Registrant(s) - refers to the Registrants named on the cover of this Report (each a "Registrant" and collectively, the "Registrants").

i
i


Subsidiary Registrant(s) - Registrants that are direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiaries of PPL: PPL Energy Supply, PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU.


WPD - refers to WPD Ltd and its subsidiaries together with a sister company PPL WW and PPL WEM and their subsidiaries.


WPD Ltd.

WPD (East Midlands) - Western Power Distribution (East Midlands) plc, a British regional electricity distribution utility company.

WPD Ltd


- Western Power Distribution Limited, an indirect U.K. subsidiary of PPL Global. Its principal indirectly owned subsidiaries are WPD (East Midlands), WPD (South Wales), WPD (South West) and WPD (West Midlands).

WPD Midlands-refers to WPD (East Midlands) and WPD (West Midlands), collectively.


WPD(South Wales) - Western Power Distribution (South Wales) plc, a British regional electricity distribution utility company.


WPD(South West) - Western Power Distribution (South West) plc, a British regional electricity distribution utility company.


WPD (West Midlands) -Western Power Distribution (West Midlands) plc, a British regional electricity distribution utility company.


WKE -Western Kentucky Energy Corp., a subsidiary of LKE that leased certain non-utility generating plants in western Kentucky until July 2009.



Other terms and abbreviations


£ - British pound sterling.


2010 Equity Unit(s) - a PPL equity unit, issued in June 2010, consisting of a 2010 Purchase Contract and, initially, a 5.0% undivided beneficial ownership interest in $1,000 principal amount of PPL Capital Funding 4.625% Junior Subordinated Notes due 2018.


2010 Purchase Contract(s) - a contract that is a component of a 2010 Equity Unit requiring holders to purchase shares of PPL common stock on or prior to July 1, 2013.

2011 Equity Unit(s) - a PPL equity unit, issued in April 2011, consisting of a 2011 Purchase Contract and, initially, a 5.0% undivided beneficial ownership interest in $1,000 principal amount of PPL Capital Funding 4.32% Junior Subordinated Notes due 2019.

2011 Purchase Contract(s) - a contract that is a component of a 2011 Equity Unit requiring holders to purchase shares of PPL common stock on or prior to May 1, 2014.

20132014 Form 10-K - Annual Report to the SEC on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

2014 Form 10-K.

Act 11 - Act 11 of 2012 that became effective on April 16, 2012. The Pennsylvania legislation authorizes the PUC to approve two specific ratemaking mechanisms: the use of a fully projected future test year in base rate proceedings and, subject to certain conditions, a DSIC.


Act 129 - Act 129 of 2008 that became effective in October 2008. The law amends the Pennsylvania Public Utility Code and creates an energy efficiency and conservation program and smart metering technology requirements, adopts new PLR electricity supply procurement rules, provides remedies for market misconduct and changes to the AEPS.


AEPS - Alternative Energy Portfolio Standard.


AFUDC- Allowance for Funds Used During Construction, the cost of equity and debt funds used to finance construction projects of regulated businesses, which is capitalized as part of construction costs.


AOCI - accumulated other comprehensive income or loss.


ARO - asset retirement obligation.


Baseload generation- includes the output provided by PPL's nuclear, coal, hydroelectric and qualifying facilities.

Basis


ii



Basis- when used in the context of derivatives and commodity trading, the commodity price differential between two locations, products or time periods.

CAIR - the EPA's Clean Air Interstate Rule.


Cane Run Unit 7 - a natural gas combined-cycle unit under construction in Kentucky, jointly owned by LG&E and KU, which is expected to provide additional electric generating capacity of 640 MW (141 MW and 499 MW to LG&E and KU) in 2015.

CCRCCR(s) - Coal Combustion Residuals.Residual(s). CCRs include fly ash, bottom ash and sulfur dioxide scrubber wastes.

ii

Clean Air Act - federal legislation enacted to address certain environmental issues related to air emissions, including acid rain, ozone and toxic air emissions.

COBRA -


CPCN - CertificateConsolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act, which provides individuals the option to temporarily continue employer group health insurance coverage after termination of Public Convenience and Necessity.  Authority granted by the KPSC pursuant to Kentucky Revised Statute 278.020 to provide utility service to or for the public or the construction of certain plant, equipment, property or facility for the furnishing of utility service to the public.employment.

CSAPR


CSAPR - Cross-State-Cross-State Air Pollution Rule.

Customer Choice Act- the Pennsylvania Electricity Generation Customer Choice and Competition Act, legislation enacted to restructure the state's electric utility industry to create retail access to a competitive market for generation of electricity.


Depreciation not normalized - the flow-through income tax impact related to the state regulatory treatment of depreciation-related timing differences.


DNO - Distribution Network Operator.Operator in the U.K.

DOJ


- U.S. Department of Justice.

DPCR4 - Distribution Price Control Review 4, the U.K. 5-yearfive-year rate review period applicable to WPD that commenced April 1, 2005.


DPCR5 - Distribution Price Control Review 5, the U.K. 5-yearfive-year rate review period applicable to WPD that commenced April 1, 2010.


DRIP - Dividend Reinvestment and Direct Stock Purchase Plan.


DSIC - the distribution system improvement chargeDistribution System Improvement Charge authorized under Act 11, which is an alternative ratemaking mechanism providing more-timely cost recovery of qualifying distribution system capital expenditures.


DSM-Demand Side Management. Pursuant to Kentucky Revised Statute 278.285, the KPSC may determine the reasonableness of DSM plans proposed by any utility under its jurisdiction. Proposed DSM mechanisms may seek full recovery of costs and revenues lost by implementing DSM programs and/or incentives designed to provide financial rewards to the utility for implementing cost-effective DSM programs. The cost of such programs shall be assigned only to the class or classes of customers which benefit from the programs.


ECR - Environmental Cost Recovery. Pursuant to Kentucky Revised Statute 278.183, Kentucky electric utilities are entitled to the current recovery of costs of complying with the Clean Air Act, as amended, and those federal, state or local environmental requirements that apply to coal combustion wastes and by-products from the production of energy from coal.


EEI -Edison Electric Energy, Inc., owns and operates a coal-fired plant and a natural gas facility in southern Illinois.  KU's 20% ownership interest in EEI is accounted for as an equity method investment.Institute,


the association that represents U.S. investor-owned electric companies.

EPA - Environmental Protection Agency, a U.S. government agency.


EPS - earnings per share.


Equity UnitsUnit(s) - refers collectively toa PPL equity unit, issued in April 2011, consisting of a Purchase Contract and, initially, a 5.0% undivided beneficial ownership interest in $1,000 principal amount of PPL Capital Funding 4.32% Junior Subordinated Notes due 2019.

ERCOT - the 2011Electric Reliability Council of Texas, operator of the electricity transmission network and 2010 Equity Units.electricity energy market in most of Texas.


ESOPE.W. Brown- Employee Stock Ownership Plan.


iii



a generating station in Kentucky with capacity of 1,594 MW.

FERC - Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the U.S. federal agency that regulates, among other things, interstate transmission and wholesale sales of electricity, hydroelectric power projects and related matters.

Fitch


Fitch- Fitch, Inc., a credit rating agency.

FTRs -financial transmission rights, which are financial instruments established to manage price risk related to electricity transmission congestion that entitle the holder to receive compensation or require the holder to remit payment for certain congestion-related transmission charges based on the level of congestion between two pricing locations, known as source and sink.

iii

GAAP - Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the U.S.


GBPGBP - British pound sterling.


GHG - greenhouse gas(es).


GLT - Gas Line Tracker. The KPSC approved LG&E's recovery of costs associated with gas service lines, gas risers, leak mitigation, and gas main replacements. Rate recovery became effective on January 1, 2013.


IBEWHoldco- - International BrotherhoodTalen Energy Holdings, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, which was formed for the purposes of Electrical Workers.


the spinoff transaction.

If-Converted Method- A method applied to calculate diluted EPS for a company with outstanding convertible debt. The method is applied as follows: Interest charges (after tax) applicable to the convertible debt are added back to net income and the convertible debt is assumed to have been converted to equity at the beginning of the period, and the resulting common shares are treated as outstanding shares. Both adjustments are made only for purposes of calculating diluted EPS. This method was applied in 2013 to PPL's Equity Units prior to settlement.


Intermediate and peaking generation- includes the output provided by PPL's oil- and natural gas-fired units.


IRSIronwood Facility - a natural gas combined-cycle unit in Lebanon, Pennsylvania with a summer rating of 660 MW.

IRS- Internal Revenue Service, a U.S. government agency.

ISO


ISO- Independent System Operator.

KPSC


KPSC- Kentucky Public Service Commission, the state agency that has jurisdiction over the regulation of rates and service of utilities in Kentucky.

LIBOR


LIBOR - London-London Interbank Offered Rate.

LTIIPMATS- Long Term Infrastructure Improvement Plan.


MATS - Mercury and Air Toxics Standards.

MDEQ


MDEQ- Montana Department of Environmental Quality.

MEIC


MEIC- Montana Environmental Information Center.

MMBtu


MMBtu- One million British Thermal Units.

Montana Power - The Montana Power Company, a Montana-based company that sold its generating assets to PPL Montana in December 1999. Through a series of transactions consummated during the first quarter of 2002, Montana Power sold its electricity delivery business to NorthWestern.


Moody's - Moody's Investors Service, Inc., a credit rating agency.


MW - megawatt, one thousand kilowatts.


MWh - megawatt-hour, one thousand kilowatt-hours.


NDT - PPL Susquehanna's nuclear plant decommissioning trust.


iv


NERC - North American Electric Reliability Corporation.


NGCC - Natural gas-fired combined-cycle generating plant.


NorthWestern- NorthWestern Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and successor in interest to Montana Power's electricity delivery business, including Montana Power's rights and obligations under contracts with PPL Montana.


NPNS - the normal purchases and normal sales exception as permitted by derivative accounting rules. Derivatives that qualify for this exception may receive accrual accounting treatment.

iv

NRC - Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the U.S. federal agency that regulates nuclear power facilities.


OCI - other comprehensive income or loss.

Ofgem


Ofgem- Office of Gas and Electricity Markets, the British agency that regulates transmission, distribution and wholesale sales of electricity and related matters.

Opacity - the degree to which emissions reduce the transmission of light and obscure the view of an object in the background. There are emission regulations that limit the opacity of power plant stack gas emissions.

OVEC-


OVEC -Ohio Valley Electric Corporation, located in Piketon, Ohio, an entity in which LKE indirectly owns an 8.13% interest (consists of LG&E's 5.63% and KU's 2.50% interests), which is accounted for as a cost-method investment. OVEC owns and operates two coal-fired power plants, the Kyger Creek plant in Ohio and the Clifty Creek plant in Indiana, with combined summer rating capacities of 2,120 MW.

PADEP - the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, a state government agency.


PJM- PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., operator of the electricity transmission network and electricity energy market in all or parts of Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia and the District of Columbia.


PLR - Provider of Last Resort, the role of PPL Electric in providing default electricity supply within its delivery area to retail customers who have not chosen to select an alternative electricity supplier under the Customer Choice Act.


PP&E- property, plant and equipment.

PUC


PUC- Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, the state agency that regulates certain ratemaking, services, accounting and operations of Pennsylvania utilities.

Purchase Contract(s) - refers collectively to the 2010 and 2011 Purchase Contracts, which are components of the 2010 and 2011 Equity Units.


RAV - regulatory asset value. This term, used within the U.K. regulatory environment, is also commonly known as RAB or regulatory asset base. RAV is based on historical investment costs at time of privatization, plus subsequent allowed additions less annual regulatory depreciation, and represents the value on which DNOs earn a return in accordance with the regulatory cost of capital. RAV is indexed to Retail Price Index (RPI) in order to allow for the effects of inflation. Since the beginning of DPCR5 in April 2010, RAV additions have been based on a percentage of annual total expenditures.

expenditures, which will continue from April 2015 under RIIO-ED1. RAV is intended to represent expenditures that have a long-term benefit to WPD (similar to capital projects for the U.S. regulated businesses that are generally included in rate base).

RCRA - Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976.


RECs - renewable energy credits.


Renewable Energy Credits.

Regional Transmission Line Expansion Plan - PJM conducts a long-range Regional Transmission Expansion Planning process that identifies changes and additions to the grid necessary to ensure future needs are met for both the reliability and the economic performance of the grid.  Under PJM agreements, transmission owners are obligated to build transmission projects assigned to them by the PJM Board.


Regulation S-X - SEC regulation governing the form and content of and requirements for financial statements required to be filed pursuant to the federal securities laws.

RFC


v


RFC- ReliabilityFirst Corporation, one of eight regional entities with delegated authority from NERC that work to safeguard the reliability of the bulk power systems throughout North America.

RIIO-ED1 - RIIO represents "Revenues = Incentive + Innovation + Outputs - Electricity Distribution.Outputs." RIIO-ED1 refers to the initial eight-year rate review period applicable to WPD commencingwhich commenced April 1, 2015.

Riverstone


- Riverstone Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and ultimate parent company of the entities that own the competitive power generation business to be contributed to Talen Energy other than the competitive power generation business to be contributed by virtue of the spinoff of a newly formed parent of PPL Energy Supply.

RJS Power - RJS Generation Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company controlled by Riverstone, that owns the competitive power generation business to be contributed by its owners to Talen Energy other than the competitive power generation business to be contributed by virtue of the spinoff of a newly formed parent of PPL Energy Supply.

RMC - Risk Management Committee.

v

S&P - Standard & Poor's Ratings Services, a credit rating agency.

Sarbanes-Oxley


Sarbanes-Oxley- Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which sets requirements for management's assessment of internal controls for financial reporting. It also requires an independent auditor to make its own assessment.

Scrubber - an air pollution control device that can remove particulates and/or gases (primarily sulfur dioxide) from exhaust gases.


SEC - the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, a U.S. government agency primarily responsible to protect investors and maintain the integrity of the securities markets.


SERC - SERC Reliability Corporation, one of eight regional entities with delegated authority from NERC that work to safeguard the reliability of the bulk power systems throughout North America.


SIFMA Index - the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association Municipal Swap Index.


Smart meter-an electric meter that utilizes smart metering technology.


Smart metering technology- technology that can measure, among other things, time of electricity consumption to permit offering rate incentives for usage during lower cost or demand intervals. The use of this technology also has the potential to strengthen network reliability.


SNCR - selective non-catalytic reduction, a pollution control process for the removal of nitrogen oxide from exhaust gases using ammonia.


Spark Spread - a measure of gross margin representing the price of power on a per MWh basis less the equivalent measure of the natural gas cost to produce that power. This measure is used to describe the gross margin of PPL and its subsidiaries' competitive natural gas-fired generating fleet. This term is also used to describe a derivative contract in which PPL and its subsidiaries sell power and buy natural gas on a forward basis in the same contract.


Superfund - federal environmental statute that addresses remediation of contaminated sites; states also have similar statutes.

Talen Energy


TC2- Trimble County Unit 2, a coal-fired plant located in Kentucky with a net summer capacity of 732 MW.  LKE indirectly owns a 75% interest (consists of LG&E's 14.25%Talen Energy Corporation, the Delaware corporation formed to be the publicly traded company and KU's 60.75% interests) in TC2 or 549 MWfuture owner of the capacity.

competitive generation assets of PPL Energy Supply and certain affiliates of Riverstone.

Tolling agreement- agreement whereby the owner of an electricity generating facility agrees to use that facility to convert fuel provided by a third party into electricity for delivery back to the third party.

Total shareowner return


- the change in market value of a share of the Company's common stock plus the value of all dividends paid on a share of the common stock during the applicable performance period, divided by the price of the common stock as of the beginning of the performance period. The price used for purposes of this calculation is the average share price for the 20 trading days at the beginning and end of the applicable period.

TRA - Tennessee Regulatory Authority, the state agency that has jurisdiction over the regulation of rates and service of utilities in Tennessee.


Treasury Stock Method - A method applied to calculate diluted EPS that assumes any proceeds that could be obtained upon exercise of options and warrants (and their equivalents) would be used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the relevant period.


VaR - value-at-risk, a statistical model that attempts to estimate the value of potential loss over a given holding period under normal market conditions at a given confidence level.


Volumetric risk - the risk that the actual load volumes provided under full-requirement sales contracts could vary significantly from forecasted volumes.

VSCC


VSCC- Virginia State Corporation Commission, the state agency that has jurisdiction over the regulation of Virginia corporations, including utilities.

vi
vi


FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATIONForward-looking Information


Statements contained in this Form 10-Q concerning expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events or performance and underlying assumptions and other statements that are other than statements of historical fact are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Although the Registrants believe that the expectations and assumptions reflected in these statements are reasonable, there can be no assurance that these expectations will prove to be correct. Forward-looking statements are subject to many risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in forward-looking statements. In addition to the specific factors discussed in each Registrant's 20132014 Form 10-K and in "Item 2. Combined Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in this Form 10-Q, the following are among the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements.


·fuel supply cost and availability;
·continuing ability to recover fuel costs and environmental expenditures in a timely manner at LG&E and KU, and natural gas supply costs at LG&E;
·weather conditions affecting generation, customer energy use and operating costs;
·operation, availability and operating costs of existing generation facilities;
·the duration of and cost, including lost revenue, associated with scheduled and unscheduled outages at our generating facilities;
·transmission and distribution system conditions and operating costs;
·expansion of alternative sources of electricity generation;
·laws or regulations to reduce emissions of "greenhouse" gases or the physical effects of climate change;
·collective labor bargaining negotiations;
·the outcome of litigation against the Registrants and their subsidiaries;
·potential effects of threatened or actual terrorism, war or other hostilities, cyber-based intrusions or natural disasters;
·the commitments and liabilities of the Registrants and their subsidiaries;
·the effectiveness of our risk management techniques, including hedging;
·the effect on our operations and ability to comply with new statutory and regulatory requirements related to derivative financial instruments;
·our ability to attract and retain qualified employees;
·volatility in market demand and prices for energy, capacity, transmission services, emission allowances and RECs;
·competition in retail and wholesale power and natural gas markets;
·liquidity of wholesale power markets;
·defaults by counterparties under energy, fuel or other power product contracts;
·market prices of commodity inputs for ongoing capital expenditures;
·capital market conditions, including the availability of capital or credit, changes in interest rates and certain economic indices, and decisions regarding capital structure;
·stock price performance of PPL;
·volatility in the fair value of debt and equity securities and its impact on the value of assets in the NDT funds and in defined benefit plans, and the potential cash funding requirements if fair value declines;
·interest rates and their effect on pension, retiree medical, nuclear decommissioning liabilities and interest payable on certain debt securities;
·volatility in or the impact of other changes in financial or commodity markets and economic conditions;
·new accounting requirements or new interpretations or applications of existing requirements;
·changes in securities and credit ratings;
·changes in foreign currency exchange rates for British pound sterling;
·current and future environmental conditions, regulations and other requirements and the related costs of compliance, including environmental capital expenditures, emission allowance costs and other expenses;
·legal, regulatory, political, market or other reactions to the 2011 incident at the nuclear generating facility at Fukushima, Japan, including additional NRC requirements;
·changes in political, regulatory or economic conditions in states, regions or countries where the Registrants or their subsidiaries conduct business;
·receipt of necessary governmental permits, approvals and rate relief;
·new state, federal or foreign legislation or regulatory developments;
·the outcome of any rate cases or other cost recovery or revenue filings by PPL Electric, LG&E, KU or WPD;
·the impact of any state, federal or foreign investigations applicable to the Registrants and their subsidiaries and the energy industry;
·the effect of any business or industry restructuring;
1
·development of new projects, markets and technologies;
·performance of new ventures; and
·business dispositions or acquisitions, including the anticipated formation of Talen Energy via the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply and subsequent combination with Riverstone's competitive generation business and our ability to successfully operate acquired businesses and realize expected benefits from such business acquisitions.transactions.

1



Any such forward-looking statements should be considered in light of such important factors and in conjunction with other documents of the Registrants on file with the SEC.


New factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for the Registrants to predict all such factors, or the extent to which any such factor or combination of factors may cause actual results to differ from those contained in any forward-looking statement. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and the Registrants undertake no obligation to update the information contained in such statement to reflect subsequent developments or information.


2
2


PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Financial Statements
                
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
PPL Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)            
(Millions of Dollars, except share data)      
                
       Three Months Ended March 31,
          2014   2013 
Operating Revenues          
 
Utility
 $ 2,162  $ 1,950 
 
Unregulated wholesale energy
   (1,429)   143 
 
Unregulated retail energy
   349    237 
 
Energy-related businesses
   141    127 
 
Total Operating Revenues
   1,223    2,457 
             
Operating Expenses            
 Operation            
  
Fuel
   758    529 
  
Energy purchases
   (1,494)   57 
  
Other operation and maintenance
   697    676 
 
Depreciation
   305    284 
 
Taxes, other than income
   104    96 
 
Energy-related businesses
   138    122 
 
Total Operating Expenses
   508    1,764 
                
Operating Income
   715    693 
                
Other Income (Expense) - net
   (23)   122 
                
Interest Expense
   264    251 
                
Income Before Income Taxes
   428    564 
                
Income Taxes
   112    151 
                
                
Net Income Attributable to PPL Shareowners
 $ 316  $ 413 
                
                
Earnings Per Share of Common Stock:   
  
Basic
 $0.50  $0.70 
  
Diluted
 $0.49  $0.65 
                
Dividends Declared Per Share of Common Stock
 $0.3725  $0.3675 
                
Weighted-Average Shares of Common Stock Outstanding (in thousands)
      
  
Basic
   630,749   582,640 
  
Diluted
   663,939   657,020 
                
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.

3


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
PPL Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars)
                
       Three Months Ended March 31,
         2014  2013 
                
Net income
 $ 316  $ 413 
                
Other comprehensive income (loss):            
Amounts arising during the period - gains (losses), net of tax (expense) benefit:      
  
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax of $1, ($6)
   131    (245)
  
Available-for-sale securities, net of tax of ($6), ($25)
   5    23 
  
Qualifying derivatives, net of tax of $25, ($20)
   (46)   62 
Reclassifications from AOCI - (gains) losses, net of tax expense (benefit):      
  
Available-for-sale securities, net of tax of $1, $1
   (1)   (1)
  
Qualifying derivatives, net of tax of ($4), $35
   19    (80)
  Defined benefit plans:            
   
Prior service costs, net of tax of ($1), ($1)
   1    1 
   
Net actuarial loss, net of tax of ($9), ($13)
   27    34 
             
Total other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to PPL Shareowners
   136    (206)
                
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to PPL Shareowners
 $ 452  $ 207 
                
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.

4


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
PPL Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars)
          
     Three Months Ended March 31,
     2014  2013 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities      
 
Net income
 $ 316  $ 413 
 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities      
  
Depreciation
   305    284 
  
Amortization
   60    64 
  
Defined benefit plans - expense
   21    51 
  
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits
   (26)   80 
  
Unrealized (gains) losses on derivatives, and other hedging activities
   241    98 
  
Adjustment to WPD line loss accrual
   65      
  
Other
   33    30 
 Change in current assets and current liabilities      
  
Accounts receivable
   (185)   (187)
  
Accounts payable
   93    (138)
  
Unbilled revenues
   (33)   137 
  
Fuel, materials and supplies
   96    55 
  
Prepayments
   (70)   (117)
  
Counterparty collateral
   2    (64)
  
Taxes payable
   126    122 
  
Other
   (51)   (129)
 Other operating activities      
  
Defined benefit plans - funding
   (135)   (429)
  
Other assets
   (3)   33 
  
Other liabilities
   76    (59)
   
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
   931    244 
Cash Flows from Investing Activities      
 
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment
   (892)   (828)
 
Purchases of nuclear plant decommissioning trust investments
   (32)   (28)
 
Proceeds from the sale of nuclear plant decommissioning trust investments
   27    24 
 
Proceeds from the receipt of grants
   56    1 
 
Net (increase) decrease in restricted cash and cash equivalents
   (334)   (52)
 
Other investing activities
   (8)   (16)
   
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
   (1,183)   (899)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities      
 
Issuance of long-term debt
        450 
 
Retirement of long-term debt
   (239)   (8)
 
Payment of common stock dividends
   (234)   (210)
 
Net increase (decrease) in short-term debt
   878    416 
 
Other financing activities
   (13)   (27)
   
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
   392    621 
Effect of Exchange Rates on Cash and Cash Equivalents
   14    (14)
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
   154    (48)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period
   1,102    901 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period
 $ 1,256   853 
          
          
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.

5


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
PPL Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars, shares in thousands)
     March 31, December 31,
     2014  2013 
Assets      
          
Current Assets      
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 $ 1,256  $ 1,102 
 
Restricted cash and cash equivalents
   416    83 
 Accounts receivable (less reserve:  2014, $66; 2013, $64)      
  
Customer
   1,108    923 
  
Other
   103    97 
 
Unbilled revenues
   874    835 
 
Fuel, materials and supplies
   607    702 
 
Prepayments
   224    153 
 
Deferred taxes
   342    246 
 
Price risk management assets
   1,087    942 
 
Regulatory assets
   32    33 
 
Other current assets
   45    37 
 
Total Current Assets
   6,094    5,153 
          
Investments      
 
Nuclear plant decommissioning trust funds
   879    864 
 
Other investments
   39    43 
 
Total Investments
   918    907 
          
Property, Plant and Equipment      
 
Regulated utility plant
   28,616    27,755 
 
Less:  accumulated depreciation - regulated utility plant
   5,108    4,873 
  
Regulated utility plant, net
   23,508    22,882 
 Non-regulated property, plant and equipment      
  
Generation
   11,818    11,881 
  
Nuclear fuel
   712    591 
  
Other
   854    834 
 
Less:  accumulated depreciation - non-regulated property, plant and equipment
   6,283    6,172 
  
Non-regulated property, plant and equipment, net
   7,101    7,134 
 
Construction work in progress
   3,165    3,071 
 
Property, Plant and Equipment, net
   33,774    33,087 
          
Other Noncurrent Assets      
 
Regulatory assets
   1,245    1,246 
 
Goodwill
   4,298    4,225 
 
Other intangibles
   943    947 
 
Price risk management assets
   344    337 
 
Other noncurrent assets
   357    357 
 
Total Other Noncurrent Assets
   7,187    7,112 
       
Total Assets
 $ 47,973  $ 46,259 

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Financial Statements
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
PPL Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars, except share data)
     Three Months Ended March 31,
     2015 2014
Operating Revenues        
 Utility $2,214 $2,162
 Unregulated wholesale energy  521  (1,457)
 Unregulated retail energy  310  348
 Energy-related businesses  120  141
 Total Operating Revenues  3,165  1,194
          
Operating Expenses      
 Operation      
  Fuel  604  758
  Energy purchases  321  (1,494)
  Other operation and maintenance  668  668
 Depreciation  293  300
 Taxes, other than income  101  101
 Energy-related businesses  111  138
 Total Operating Expenses  2,098  471
          
Operating Income  1,067  723
          
Other Income (Expense) - net  95  (23)
      
Interest Expense  247  262
          
Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes  915  438
          
Income Taxes  268  114
          
Income from Continuing Operations After Income Taxes  647  324
          
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations (net of income taxes)     (8)
          
Net Income $647 $316
          
          
Earnings Per Share of Common Stock:      
 Income from Continuing Operations After Income Taxes Available to PPL  
  Common Shareowners:      
  Basic $0.97 $0.51
  Diluted $0.96 $0.50
 Net Income Available to PPL Common Shareowners:      
  Basic $0.97 $0.50
  Diluted $0.96 $0.49
          
Dividends Declared Per Share of Common Stock $0.3725 $0.3725
          
Weighted-Average Shares of Common Stock Outstanding(in thousands)      
  Basic  666,974  630,749
  Diluted  668,732  663,939

The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.


6



CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
PPL Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars, shares in thousands)
     March 31, December 31,
     2014  2013 
Liabilities and Equity      
          
Current Liabilities      
 
Short-term debt
 $ 1,579  $ 701 
 
Long-term debt due within one year
   304    315 
 
Accounts payable
   1,345    1,308 
 
Taxes
   240    114 
 
Interest
   358    325 
 
Dividends
   236    232 
 
Price risk management liabilities
   1,302    829 
 
Regulatory liabilities
   80    90 
 
Other current liabilities
   932    998 
 
Total Current Liabilities
   6,376    4,912 
          
Long-term Debt
   20,514    20,592 
          
Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities      
 
Deferred income taxes
   4,096    3,928 
 
Investment tax credits
   281    342 
 
Price risk management liabilities
   450    415 
 
Accrued pension obligations
   1,159    1,286 
 
Asset retirement obligations
   701    687 
 
Regulatory liabilities
   1,037    1,048 
 
Other deferred credits and noncurrent liabilities
   642    583 
 
Total Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities
   8,366    8,289 
          
Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (Notes 6 and 10)      
          
Equity      
  
Common stock - $0.01 par value (a)
   6    6 
  
Additional paid-in capital
   8,352    8,316 
  
Earnings reinvested
   5,788    5,709 
  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
   (1,429)   (1,565)
  
Total Equity
   12,717    12,466 
          
Total Liabilities and Equity
 $ 47,973  $ 46,259 

3

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
PPL Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars)
          
     Three Months Ended March 31,
     2015 2014
          
Net income $ 647 $ 316
          
Other comprehensive income (loss):      
Amounts arising during the period - gains (losses), net of tax (expense) benefit:      
  Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax of ($5), $1   (66)   131
  Available-for-sale securities, net of tax of ($6), ($6)   5   5
  Qualifying derivatives, net of tax of $4, $25   6   (46)
  Defined benefit plans:      
   Net actuarial gain (loss), net of tax of $0, $0   (1)   
Reclassifications from AOCI - (gains) losses, net of tax expense (benefit):      
  Available-for-sale securities, net of tax of $1, $1   (1)   (1)
  Qualifying derivatives, net of tax of $4, ($4)   (17)   19
  Equity investees' other comprehensive (income) loss, net of      
   tax of $1, $0   (1)   
  Defined benefit plans:      
   Prior service costs, net of tax of $0, ($1)      1
   Net actuarial loss, net of tax of ($13), ($9)   38   27
Total other comprehensive income (loss)   (37)   136
          
Comprehensive income (loss) $ 610 $ 452

The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.

4

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
PPL Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars)
          
     Three Months Ended March 31,
     2015 2014
Cash Flows from Operating Activities      
 Net income $ 647 $ 316
 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities      
  Depreciation   293   305
  Amortization   57   60
  Defined benefit plans - expense   28   21
  Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits   124   (26)
  Unrealized (gains) losses on derivatives, and other hedging activities   (90)   241
  Adjustment to WPD line loss accrual      65
  Stock compensation expense   28   28
  Other   4   5
 Change in current assets and current liabilities      
  Accounts receivable   (143)   (185)
  Accounts payable   (139)   93
  Unbilled revenues   111   (33)
  Fuel, materials and supplies   149   96
  Prepayments   (81)   (70)
  Taxes payable   44   126
  Other current liabilities   (172)   (59)
  Other   38   10
 Other operating activities      
  Defined benefit plans - funding   (271)   (135)
  Other assets   (1)   (3)
  Other liabilities   47   76
   Net cash provided by operating activities   673   931
Cash Flows from Investing Activities      
 Expenditures for property, plant and equipment   (942)   (892)
 Expenditures for intangible assets   (20)   (16)
 Purchases of nuclear plant decommissioning trust investments   (43)   (32)
 Proceeds from the sale of nuclear plant decommissioning trust investments   38   27
 Proceeds from the receipt of grants      56
 Net (increase) decrease in restricted cash and cash equivalents   (10)   (334)
 Other investing activities   (13)   8
   Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities   (990)   (1,183)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities      
 Retirement of long-term debt   (1)   (239)
 Issuance of common stock   35   15
 Payment of common stock dividends   (250)   (234)
 Net increase (decrease) in short-term debt   133   878
 Other financing activities   (14)   (28)
   Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities   (97)   392
Effect of Exchange Rates on Cash and Cash Equivalents   (2)   14
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents   (416)   154
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period   1,751   1,102
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period $ 1,335 $ 1,256

The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.

5

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
PPL Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars, shares in thousands)
     March 31, December 31,
     2015 2014
Assets      
          
Current Assets      
 Cash and cash equivalents $ 1,335 $ 1,751
 Short-term investments   135   120
 Restricted cash and cash equivalents   190   180
 Accounts receivable (less reserve:  2015, $47; 2014, $46)      
  Customer   1,104   923
  Other   127   171
 Unbilled revenues   621   735
 Fuel, materials and supplies   687   836
 Prepayments   168   87
 Deferred income taxes   155   129
 Price risk management assets   1,119   1,158
 Regulatory assets   23   37
 Other current assets   35   32
 Total Current Assets   5,699   6,159
          
Investments      
 Nuclear plant decommissioning trust funds   965   950
 Other investments   34   35
 Total Investments   999   985
          
Property, Plant and Equipment      
 Regulated utility plant   30,852   30,568
 Less:  accumulated depreciation - regulated utility plant   5,413   5,361
  Regulated utility plant, net   25,439   25,207
 Non-regulated property, plant and equipment      
  Generation   11,309   11,310
  Nuclear fuel   749   624
  Other   893   885
 Less:  accumulated depreciation - non-regulated property, plant and equipment   6,516   6,404
  Non-regulated property, plant and equipment, net   6,435   6,415
 Construction work in progress   3,085   2,975
 Property, Plant and Equipment, net   34,959   34,597
          
Other Noncurrent Assets      
 Regulatory assets   1,610   1,562
 Goodwill   3,964   4,005
 Other intangibles   920   925
 Price risk management assets   437   319
 Other noncurrent assets   333   312
 Total Other Noncurrent Assets   7,264   7,123
          
Total Assets $ 48,921 $ 48,864

The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.

6

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
PPL Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars, shares in thousands)
     March 31, December 31,
     2015 2014
Liabilities and Equity      
          
Current Liabilities      
 Short-term debt $ 1,595 $ 1,466
 Long-term debt due within one year   1,535   1,535
 Accounts payable   1,128   1,356
 Taxes   274   230
 Interest   345   314
 Dividends   249   249
 Price risk management liabilities   1,073   1,126
 Regulatory liabilities   109   91
 Other current liabilities   909   1,076
 Total Current Liabilities   7,217   7,443
          
Long-term Debt   18,772   18,856
          
Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities      
 Deferred income taxes   4,627   4,450
 Investment tax credits   157   159
 Price risk management liabilities   333   252
 Accrued pension obligations   1,457   1,756
 Asset retirement obligations   739   739
 Regulatory liabilities   987   992
 Other deferred credits and noncurrent liabilities   596   589
 Total Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities   8,896   8,937
          
Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (Notes 6 and 10)      
          
Equity      
  Common stock - $0.01 par value (a)   7   7
  Additional paid-in capital   9,480   9,433
  Earnings reinvested   6,860   6,462
  Accumulated other comprehensive loss   (2,311)   (2,274)
 Total Equity   14,036   13,628
          
Total Liabilities and Equity $ 48,921 $ 48,864

(a)780,000 shares authorized; 631,417667,713 and 630,321665,849 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 20142015 and December 31, 2013.2014.

The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.


7
 The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.

7


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
PPL Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars)
    PPL Shareowners      
    Common                  
     stock           Accumulated      
    shares     Additional     other  Non-   
    outstanding  Common  paid-in  Earnings  comprehensive  controlling   
    (a)  stock  capital  reinvested  loss  interests  Total
                    
December 31, 2013
  630,321  $ 6  $ 8,316  $ 5,709  $ (1,565)      $ 12,466 
Common stock issued (b)
  1,096         30                   30 
Stock-based compensation (c)
            6                   6 
Net income
                 316              316 
Dividends and dividend                    
 
equivalents (d)
                 (237)             (237)
Other comprehensive                                
 
income (loss)
                      136         136 
March 31, 2014
  631,417  $ 6  $ 8,352  $ 5,788  $ (1,429)      $ 12,717 
                       
December 31, 2012
  581,944  $ 6  $ 6,936  $ 5,478  $ (1,940) $ 18  $ 10,498 
Common stock issued (b)
  1,270         37                   37 
Stock-based compensation (c)
            15                   15 
Net income
                 413              413 
Dividends, dividend equivalents                    
 
and distributions (d)
                 (215)             (215)
Other comprehensive                    
 
income (loss)
                      (206)        (206)
March 31, 2013
  583,214  $ 6  $ 6,988  $ 5,676  $ (2,146) $ 18  $ 10,542 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
PPL Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars)   
        
    Common               
     stock           Accumulated   
    shares     Additional     other   
    outstanding  Common  paid-in  Earnings  comprehensive   
    (a)  stock  capital  reinvested  loss  Total
               
December 31, 2014  665,849 $ 7 $ 9,433 $ 6,462 $ (2,274) $ 13,628
Common stock issued  1,864      54         54
Stock-based compensation        (7)         (7)
Net income           647      647
Dividends and dividend                 
  equivalents           (249)      (249)
Other comprehensive                 
 income (loss)              (37)   (37)
March 31, 2015  667,713 $ 7 $ 9,480 $ 6,860 $ (2,311) $ 14,036
                  
December 31, 2013  630,321 $ 6 $ 8,316 $ 5,709 $ (1,565) $ 12,466
Common stock issued  1,096      30         30
Stock-based compensation        6         6
Net income           316      316
Dividends and dividend                 
  equivalents           (237)      (237)
Other comprehensive                 
 income (loss)              136   136
March 31, 2014  631,417 $ 6 $ 8,352 $ 5,788 $ (1,429) $ 12,717

(a)Shares in thousands. Each share entitles the holder to one vote on any question presented at any shareowners' meeting.
(b)Each period includes shares of common stock issued through various stock and incentive compensation plans.
(c)The three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 include $27 million and $28 million of stock-based compensation expense related to new and existing unvested equity awards.  These periods also include $(21) million and $(13) million related primarily to the reclassification from "Stock-based compensation" to "Common stock issued" for the issuance of common stock after applicable equity award vesting periods and tax adjustments related to stock-based compensation.
(d)"Earnings reinvested" includes dividends and dividend equivalents on PPL common stock and restricted stock units.

The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.


8

(THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY.)

8
9


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
PPL Energy Supply, LLC and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)      
(Millions of Dollars)      
                
       Three Months Ended March 31,
         2014  2013 
Operating Revenues            
 
Unregulated wholesale energy
 $ (1,429) $ 143 
 
Unregulated wholesale energy to affiliate
   27    14 
 
Unregulated retail energy
   351    238 
 
Energy-related businesses
   125    113 
 
Total Operating Revenues
   (926)   508 
                
Operating Expenses            
 Operation            
  
Fuel
   482    298 
  
Energy purchases
   (1,804)   (199)
  
Other operation and maintenance
   258    235 
 
Depreciation
   80    78 
 
Taxes, other than income
   21    17 
 
Energy-related businesses
   124    110 
 
Total Operating Expenses
   (839)   539 
                
Operating Income (Loss)
   (87)   (31)
                
Other Income (Expense) - net
   6    4 
                
Interest Expense
   34    46 
                
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes
   (115)   (73)
                
Income Taxes
   (49)   (35)
                
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to PPL Energy Supply Member
 $ (66) $ (38)
                
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.

9


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
PPL Energy Supply, LLC and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars)
                
       Three Months Ended March 31,
         2014  2013 
                
Net income (loss)
 $ (66) $ (38)
                
Other comprehensive income (loss):            
Amounts arising during the period - gains (losses), net of tax (expense) benefit:      
  
Available-for-sale securities, net of tax of ($6), ($25)
   5    23 
Reclassifications from AOCI - (gains) losses, net of tax expense (benefit):      
  
Available-for-sale securities, net of tax of $1, $1
   (1)   (1)
  
Qualifying derivatives, net of tax of $4, $21
   (5)   (30)
  Defined benefit plans:            
   
Prior service costs, net of tax of ($1), ($1)
   1    1 
   
Net actuarial loss, net of tax of ($1), ($2)
   1    4 
             
Total other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to PPL Energy Supply      
 
Member
   1    (3)
                
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to PPL Energy Supply Member
 $ (65) $ (41)
                
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.

10


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
PPL Energy Supply, LLC and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars)
          
     Three Months Ended March 31,
     2014  2013 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities      
 
Net income (loss)
 $ (66) $ (38)
 Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided (used in) by operating activities          
  
Depreciation
   80    78 
  
Amortization
   44    44 
  
Defined benefit plans - expense
   8    12 
  
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits
   (121)   (21)
  
Impairment of assets
   18      
  
Unrealized (gains) losses on derivatives, and other hedging activities
   229    214 
  
Other
   5    5 
 Change in current assets and current liabilities      
  
Accounts receivable
   (15)   71 
  
Accounts payable
   153    (94)
  
Unbilled revenues
   (92)   123 
  
Fuel, materials and supplies
   43    11 
  
Prepayments
   (10)   (104)
  
Taxes payable
   53    37 
  
Counterparty collateral
   2    (64)
  
Other
   (22)   (14)
 Other operating activities      
  
Defined benefit plans - funding
   (30)   (105)
  
Other assets
   (5)   44 
  
Other liabilities
   2    (74)
   
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
   276    125 
Cash Flows from Investing Activities      
 
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment
   (88)   (124)
 
Purchases of nuclear plant decommissioning trust investments
   (32)   (28)
 
Proceeds from the sale of nuclear plant decommissioning trust investments
   27    24 
 
Proceeds from the receipt of grants
   56      
 
Net (increase) decrease in restricted cash and cash equivalents
   (344)   (59)
 
Other investing activities
   (8)   (8)
   
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
   (389)   (195)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities      
 
Distributions to member
   (654)   (313)
 
Net increase (decrease) in short-term debt
   970    125 
 
Other financing activities
   (1)   (8)
   
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
   315    (196)
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
   202    (266)
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period
   239    413 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period
 $ 441  $ 147 
          
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.

11


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
PPL Energy Supply, LLC and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars)
     March 31, December 31,
     2014  2013 
Assets      
          
Current Assets      
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 $ 441  $ 239 
 
Restricted cash and cash equivalents
   412    68 
 Accounts receivable (less reserve:  2014, $21; 2013, $21)      
  
Customer
   232    233 
  
Other
   92    97 
 
Accounts receivable from affiliates
   66    45 
 
Unbilled revenues
   378    286 
 
Fuel, materials and supplies
   315    358 
 
Prepayments
   30    20��
 
Deferred taxes
   87      
 
Price risk management assets
   1,080    860 
 
Other current assets
   30    27 
 
Total Current Assets
   3,163    2,233 
        
Investments      
 
Nuclear plant decommissioning trust funds
   879    864 
 
Other investments
   34    37 
 
Total Investments
   913    901 
        
Property, Plant and Equipment      
 Non-regulated property, plant and equipment      
  
Generation
   11,826    11,891 
  
Nuclear fuel
   712    591 
  
Other
   290    288 
 
Less:  accumulated depreciation - non-regulated property, plant and equipment
   6,141    6,046 
  
Non-regulated property, plant and equipment, net
   6,687    6,724 
 
Construction work in progress
   369    450 
 
Property, Plant and Equipment, net
   7,056    7,174 
        
Other Noncurrent Assets      
 
Goodwill
   86    86 
 
Other intangibles
   266    266 
 
Price risk management assets
   337    328 
 
Other noncurrent assets
   82    86 
 
Total Other Noncurrent Assets
   771    766 
        
Total Assets
 $ 11,903  $ 11,074 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)      
(Millions of Dollars)     
         
         
    Three Months Ended March 31,
    2015 2014
       
Operating Revenues $ 630 $ 592
         
Operating Expenses      
 Operation      
  Energy purchases   227   189
  Energy purchases from affiliate   9   27
  Other operation and maintenance   133   134
 Depreciation   51   45
 Taxes, other than income   35   32
 Total Operating Expenses   455   427
         
Operating Income   175   165
         
Other Income (Expense) - net   2   2
         
Interest Expense   31   29
         
Income Before Income Taxes   146   138
         
Income Taxes   59   53
         
Net Income (a) $ 87 $ 85

(a)Net income approximates comprehensive income.

The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.


10
12



CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
PPL Energy Supply, LLC and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars)
     March 31, December 31,
     2014  2013 
Liabilities and Equity      
          
Current Liabilities      
 
Short-term debt
 $ 970      
 
Long-term debt due within one year
   304  $ 304 
 
Accounts payable
   490    393 
 
Accounts payable to affiliates
   33    4 
 
Taxes
   84    31 
 
Interest
   43    22 
 
Price risk management liabilities
   1,211    750 
 
Other current liabilities
   239    278 
 
Total Current Liabilities
   3,374    1,782 
          
Long-term Debt
   2,220    2,221 
       
Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities      
 
Deferred income taxes
   1,154    1,114 
 
Investment tax credits
   145    205 
 
Price risk management liabilities
   316    320 
 
Accrued pension obligations
   84    111 
 
Asset retirement obligations
   400    393 
 
Other deferred credits and noncurrent liabilities
   131    130 
 
Total Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities
   2,230    2,273 
          
Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (Note 10)      
       
Member's Equity
   4,079    4,798 
          
Total Liabilities and Equity
 $ 11,903  $ 11,074 
          
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.

13


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
PPL Energy Supply, LLC and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars)
          
     Non-   
  Member's controlling   
  equity interests Total
          
December 31, 2013
 $ 4,798       $ 4,798 
Net income (loss)
   (66)        (66)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
   1         1 
Distributions
   (654)        (654)
March 31, 2014
 $ 4,079       $ 4,079 
          
December 31, 2012
 $ 3,830  $ 18  $ 3,848 
Net income (loss)
   (38)        (38)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
   (3)        (3)
Distributions
   (313)        (313)
March 31, 2013
 $ 3,476  $ 18  $ 3,494 



CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars)
          
     Three Months Ended
     March 31,
     2015 2014
Cash Flows from Operating Activities      
 Net income $ 87 $ 85
 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities      
  Depreciation   51   45
  Amortization   6   4
  Defined benefit plans - expense   4   3
  Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits   5   25
  Other   (3)   (14)
 Change in current assets and current liabilities      
  Accounts receivable   (73)   (107)
  Accounts payable   (39)   22
  Prepayments   (60)   (61)
  Other   (6)   (1)
 Other operating activities      
  Defined benefit plans - funding   (33)   (19)
  Other assets   (1)   4
  Other liabilities   17   10
   Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities   (45)   (4)
         
Cash Flows from Investing Activities      
 Expenditures for property, plant and equipment   (224)   (201)
 Net (increase) decrease in notes receivable from affiliates      150
 Other investing activities   (1)   9
   Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities   (225)   (42)
         
Cash Flows from Financing Activities      
 Retirement of long-term debt      (10)
 Contributions from parent   50   65
 Payment of common stock dividends to parent   (44)   (32)
 Net increase (decrease) in short-term debt   85   40
   Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities   91   63
         
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents   (179)   17
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period   214   25
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period $ 35 $ 42

The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.


14
























(THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY.)

15


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
 
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation and Subsidiaries 
(Unaudited)             
(Millions of Dollars)       
                
      Three Months Ended March 31, 
        2014  2013  
              
Operating Revenues
 $ 592  $ 513  
                
Operating Expenses             
 Operation             
  
Energy purchases
   189    172  
  
Energy purchases from affiliate
   27    14  
  
Other operation and maintenance
   134    133  
 
Depreciation
   45    43  
 
Taxes, other than income
   32    30  
 
Total Operating Expenses
   427    392  
                
Operating Income
   165    121  
                
Other Income (Expense) - net
   2    1  
                
Interest Expense
   29    25  
                
Income Before Income Taxes
   138    97  
                
Income Taxes
   53    33  
                
Net Income (a)
 $ 85  $ 64  

(a)Net income approximates comprehensive income.11

 The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.

16


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars)
          
     Three Months Ended March 31,
     2014  2013 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities      
 
Net income
 $ 85  $ 64 
 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities          
  
Depreciation
   45    43 
  
Amortization
   4    5 
  
Defined benefit plans - expense
   3    7 
  
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits
   25    45 
  
Other
   (14)   (3)
 Change in current assets and current liabilities      
  
Accounts receivable
   (107)   (87)
  
Accounts payable
   22    (34)
  
Prepayments
   (61)   (28)
  
Other
   (1)   (6)
 Other operating activities      
  
Defined benefit plans - funding
   (19)   (88)
  
Other assets
   4    8 
  
Other liabilities
   10    (3)
   
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
   (4)   (77)
          
Cash Flows from Investing Activities      
 
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment
   (201)   (189)
 
Net (increase) decrease in notes receivable from affiliates
   150      
 
Other investing activities
   9    (3)
   
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
   (42)   (192)
          
Cash Flows from Financing Activities      
 
Retirement of long-term debt
   (10)     
 
Contributions from parent
   65    60 
 
Payment of common stock dividends to parent
   (32)   (25)
 
Net increase (decrease) in short-term debt
   40    125 
   
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
   63    160 
          
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
   17    (109)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period
   25    140 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period
 $ 42  $ 31 
          
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.

17


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars, shares in thousands)
          
     March 31, December 31,
     2014  2013 
Assets      
          
Current Assets      
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 $ 42  $ 25 
 Accounts receivable (less reserve: 2014, $17; 2013, $18)      
  
Customer
   387    284 
  
Other
   9    5 
 
Accounts receivable from affiliates
   4    4 
 
Notes receivable from affiliate
        150 
 
Unbilled revenues
   105    116 
 
Materials and supplies
   34    35 
 
Prepayments
   101    40 
 
Deferred income taxes
   82    85 
 
Other current assets
   10    22 
 
Total Current Assets
   774    766 
          
Property, Plant and Equipment      
 
Regulated utility plant
   6,998    6,886 
 
Less: accumulated depreciation - regulated utility plant
   2,454    2,417 
  
Regulated utility plant, net
   4,544    4,469 
 
Other, net
   1    2 
 
Construction work in progress
   684    591 
 
Property, Plant and Equipment, net
   5,229    5,062 
          
Other Noncurrent Assets      
 
Regulatory assets
   770    772 
 
Intangibles
   214    211 
 
Other noncurrent assets
   35    35 
 
Total Other Noncurrent Assets
   1,019    1,018 
          
Total Assets
 $ 7,022  $ 6,846 
          
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.

18



CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars, shares in thousands)
          
     March 31, December 31,
     2014  2013 
Liabilities and Equity      
          
Current Liabilities      
 
Short-term debt
 $ 60  $ 20 
 
Long-term debt due within one year
        10 
 
Accounts payable
   300    295 
 
Accounts payable to affiliates
   88    57 
 
Taxes
   39    51 
 
Interest
   23    34 
 
Regulatory liabilities
   68    76 
 
Other current liabilities
   83    82 
 
Total Current Liabilities
   661    625 
          
Long-term Debt
   2,306    2,305 
          
Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities      
 
Deferred income taxes
   1,439    1,399 
 
Accrued pension obligations
   78    96 
 
Regulatory liabilities
   13    15 
 
Other deferred credits and noncurrent liabilities
   58    57 
 
Total Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities
   1,588    1,567 
          
Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (Notes 6 and 10)          
          
Stockholder's Equity      
 
Common stock - no par value (a)
   364    364 
 
Additional paid-in capital
   1,405    1,340 
 
Earnings reinvested
   698    645 
 
Total Equity
   2,467    2,349 
          
Total Liabilities and Equity
 $ 7,022  $ 6,846 

(a)170,000 shares authorized; 66,368 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars, shares in thousands)
          
     March 31, December 31,
     2015 2014
Assets      
          
Current Assets      
 Cash and cash equivalents $ 35 $ 214
 Accounts receivable (less reserve: 2015, $17; 2014, $17)      
  Customer   403   312
  Other   27   44
 Unbilled revenues   115   113
 Materials and supplies   38   43
 Prepayments   70   10
 Deferred income taxes   66   58
 Regulatory assets   3   12
 Other current assets   12   13
 Total Current Assets   769   819
          
Property, Plant and Equipment      
 Regulated utility plant   7,717   7,589
 Less: accumulated depreciation - regulated utility plant   2,555   2,517
  Regulated utility plant, net   5,162   5,072
 Construction work in progress   837   738
 Property, Plant and Equipment, net   5,999   5,810
          
Other Noncurrent Assets      
 Regulatory assets   891   897
 Intangibles   237   235
 Other noncurrent assets   25   24
 Total Other Noncurrent Assets   1,153   1,156
          
Total Assets $ 7,921 $ 7,785

The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.


19


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars)
            
   Common        
   stock        
   shares   Additional    
   outstanding Common  paid-in Earnings  
    (a)  stock  capital  reinvested Total
                
December 31, 2013
  66,368  $ 364  $ 1,340  $ 645  $ 2,349 
Net income
                 85    85 
Capital contributions from PPL
            65         65 
Cash dividends declared on common stock
                 (32)   (32)
March 31, 2014
  66,368  $ 364  $ 1,405  $ 698  $ 2,467 
                
December 31, 2012
  66,368  $ 364  $ 1,135  $ 563  $ 2,062 
Net income
                 64    64 
Capital contributions from PPL
            60         60 
Cash dividends declared on common stock
                 (25)   (25)
March 31, 2013
  66,368  $ 364  $ 1,195  $ 602  $ 2,161 

12
(a)  

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars, shares in thousands)
          
     March 31, December 31,
     2015 2014
Liabilities and Equity      
          
Current Liabilities      
 Short-term debt $ 85   
 Long term debt due within one year   100 $ 100
 Accounts payable   301   325
 Accounts payable to affiliates   70   70
 Taxes   90   85
 Interest   26   34
 Regulatory liabilities   85   76
 Other current liabilities   80   103
 Total Current Liabilities   837   793
          
Long-term Debt   2,503   2,502
          
Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities      
 Deferred income taxes   1,497   1,483
 Accrued pension obligations   182   212
 Regulatory liabilities   26   18
 Other deferred credits and noncurrent liabilities   66   60
 Total Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities   1,771   1,773
          
Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (Notes 6 and 10)      
          
Equity      
 Common stock - no par value (a)   364   364
 Additional paid-in capital   1,653   1,603
 Earnings reinvested   793   750
 Total Equity   2,810   2,717
          
Total Liabilities and Equity $ 7,921 $ 7,785

(a)170,000 shares authorized; 66,368 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.

13

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars)
             
    Common        
    stock        
    shares   Additional    
    outstanding Common  paid-in Earnings  
     (a)  stock  capital  reinvested Total
                 
December 31, 2014  66,368 $ 364 $ 1,603 $ 750 $ 2,717
Net income           87   87
Capital contributions from PPL        50      50
Cash dividends declared on common stock           (44)   (44)
March 31, 2015  66,368 $ 364 $ 1,653 $ 793 $ 2,810
              
December 31, 2013  66,368 $ 364 $ 1,340 $ 645 $ 2,349
Net income           85   85
Capital contributions from PPL        65      65
Cash dividends declared on common stock           (32)   (32)
March 31, 2014  66,368 $ 364 $ 1,405 $ 698 $ 2,467

(a)Shares in thousands. All common shares of PPL Electric stock are owned by PPL.

The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.

20






















(THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY.)

21


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
LG&E and KU Energy LLC and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)            
(Millions of Dollars)      
                
       Three Months Ended March 31,
          2014   2013 
             
Operating Revenues
 $ 934  $ 800 
             
Operating Expenses            
 Operation            
  
Fuel
   277    231 
  
Energy purchases
   124    86 
  
Other operation and maintenance
   206    197 
 
Depreciation
   86    82 
 
Taxes, other than income
   13    12��
 
Total Operating Expenses
   706    608 
                
Operating Income
   228    192 
                
Other Income (Expense) - net
   (2)   (2)
             
Interest Expense
   42    37 
                
Income Before Income Taxes
   184    153 
                
Income Taxes
   69    57 
                
Net Income (a)
 $ 115  $ 96 
                
                
(a)    Net income approximates comprehensive income.
                
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.

22


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
LG&E and KU Energy LLC and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars)
          
  Three Months Ended March 31,
     2014  2013 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities      
 
Net income
 $ 115  $ 96 
 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities      
  
Depreciation
   86    82 
  
Amortization
   6    7 
  
Defined benefit plans - expense
   8    17 
  
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits
   74    45 
  
Other
   (1)   1 
 Change in current assets and current liabilities      
  
Accounts receivable
   (50)   (78)
  
Accounts payable
   22    31 
  
Accounts payable to affiliates
        1 
  
Unbilled revenues
   36      
  
Fuel, materials and supplies
   53    47 
  
Accrued interest
   36    30 
  
Taxes
   (14)   (2)
  
Other
   (24)   (29)
 Other operating activities      
  
Defined benefit plans - funding
   (38)   (154)
  
Other assets
        2 
  
Other liabilities
        (11)
   
Net cash provided by operating activities
   309    85 
Cash Flows from Investing Activities      
 
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment
   (272)   (271)
 
Net (increase) decrease in notes receivable from affiliates
   66      
 
Net (increase) decrease in restricted cash and cash equivalents
   1    4 
   
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
   (205)   (267)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities      
 
Net increase (decrease) in notes payable with affiliates
        60 
 
Net increase (decrease) in short-term debt
   (45)   60 
 
Distributions to member
   (104)   (4)
 
Contributions from member
   40    75 
   
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
   (109)   191 
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
   (5)   9 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period
   35    43 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period
 $ 30  $ 52 
          
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.

23


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LG&E and KU Energy LLC and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars)
          
     March 31, December 31,
     2014  2013 
Assets      
          
Current Assets      
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 $ 30  $ 35 
 Accounts receivable (less reserve: 2014, $26; 2013, $22)      
  
Customer
   265    224 
  
Other
   27    20 
 
Unbilled revenues
   144    180 
 
Fuel, materials and supplies
   225    278 
 
Prepayments
   22    21 
 
Notes receivable from affiliates
   4    70 
 
Deferred income taxes
   139    159 
 
Regulatory assets
   31    27 
 
Other current assets
   3    3 
 
Total Current Assets
   890    1,017 
          
Property, Plant and Equipment      
 
Regulated utility plant
   8,683    8,526 
 
Less: accumulated depreciation - regulated utility plant
   849    778 
  
Regulated utility plant, net
   7,834    7,748 
 
Other, net
   3    3 
 
Construction work in progress
   1,868    1,793 
 
Property, Plant and Equipment, net
   9,705    9,544 
          
Other Noncurrent Assets      
 
Regulatory assets
   475    474 
 
Goodwill
   996    996 
 
Other intangibles
   209    221 
 
Other noncurrent assets
   96    98 
 
Total Other Noncurrent Assets
   1,776    1,789 
          
Total Assets
 $ 12,371  $ 12,350 
          
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.

24



CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LG&E and KU Energy LLC and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars)
     March 31, December 31,
     2014  2013 
Liabilities and Equity      
          
Current Liabilities      
 
Short-term debt
 $ 200  $ 245 
 
Accounts payable
   341    346 
 
Accounts payable to affiliates
   3    3 
 
Customer deposits
   50    50 
 
Taxes
   25    39 
 
Price risk management liabilities
   4    4 
 
Regulatory liabilities
   12    14 
 
Interest
   59    23 
 
Other current liabilities
   87    111 
 
Total Current Liabilities
   781    835 
          
Long-term Debt
   4,565    4,565 
       
Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities      
 
Deferred income taxes
   1,021    965 
 
Investment tax credits
   134    135 
 
Accrued pension obligations
   119    152 
 
Asset retirement obligations
   251    245 
 
Regulatory liabilities
   1,024    1,033 
 
Price risk management liabilities
   36    32 
 
Other deferred credits and noncurrent liabilities
   240    238 
 
Total Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities
   2,825    2,800 
          
Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (Notes 6 and 10)      
          
Member's equity
   4,200    4,150 
          
Total Liabilities and Equity
 $ 12,371  $ 12,350 
          
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.

25


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
LG&E and KU Energy LLC and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars)
Member's
Equity
December 31, 2013
$4,150 
Net income
 115 
Contributions from member
 40 
Distributions to member
 (104)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
 (1)
March 31, 2014
$ 4,200 
December 31, 2012
$3,786 
Net income
 96 
Contributions from member
 75 
Distributions to member
 (4)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
 (1)
March 31, 2013
$ 3,952 

The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.


14
26

























(THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY.)


27


CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Louisville Gas and Electric Company
(Unaudited)            
(Millions of Dollars)      
                
       Three Months Ended March 31,
          2014   2013 
Operating Revenues            
 
Retail and wholesale
 $ 442  $ 369 
 
Electric revenue from affiliate
   37    21 
 
Total Operating Revenues
   479    390 
                
Operating Expenses            
 Operation            
  
Fuel
   117    96 
  
Energy purchases
   118    80 
  
Energy purchases from affiliate
   6    1 
  
Other operation and maintenance
   98    91 
 
Depreciation
   38    36 
 
Taxes, other than income
   6    6 
 
Total Operating Expenses
   383    310 
                
Operating Income
   96    80 
                
Other Income (Expense) - net
   (2)   (1)
                
Interest Expense
   12    10 
                
Income Before Income Taxes
   82    69 
                
Income Taxes
   30    25 
                
Net Income (a)
 $ 52  $ 44 

15

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
LG&E and KU Energy LLC and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)      
(Millions of Dollars)     
          
     Three Months Ended March 31,
      2015  2014
       
Operating Revenues $ 899 $ 934
       
Operating Expenses      
 Operation      
  Fuel   253   277
  Energy purchases   92   124
  Other operation and maintenance   209   206
 Depreciation   95   86
 Taxes, other than income   14   13
 Total Operating Expenses   663   706
          
Operating Income   236   228
          
Other Income (Expense) - net   (1)   (2)
      
Interest Expense   42   42
          
Income Before Income Taxes   193   184
          
Income Taxes   76   69
          
Net Income (a) $ 117 $ 115

(a)Net income equalsapproximates comprehensive income.

The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.

28


CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Louisville Gas and Electric Company
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars)
          
  Three Months Ended March 31,
     2014  2013 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities      
 
Net income
 $ 52  $ 44 
 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities      
  
Depreciation
   38    36 
  
Amortization
   3    3 
  
Defined benefit plans - expense
   2    6 
  
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits
   6    11 
  
Other
   (5)   (5)
 Change in current assets and current liabilities      
  
Accounts receivable
   (40)   (37)
  
Accounts payable
   14    9 
  
Accounts payable to affiliates
   (7)   (7)
  
Unbilled revenues
   22    1 
  
Fuel, materials and supplies
   44    37 
  
Taxes
   21    17 
  
Other
   5    11 
 Other operating activities      
  
Defined benefit plans - funding
   (9)   (43)
  
Other liabilities
   2    2 
   
Net cash provided by operating activities
   148    85 
Cash Flows from Investing Activities      
 
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment
   (116)   (98)
 
Net (increase) decrease in restricted cash and cash equivalents
   1    4 
   
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
   (115)   (94)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities      
 
Net increase (decrease) in short-term debt
   (5)   15 
 
Payment of common stock dividends to parent
   (27)   (19)
 
Contributions from parent
        25 
   
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
   (32)   21 
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
   1    12 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period
   8    22 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period
 $ 9  $ 34 
          
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.

29


CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
Louisville Gas and Electric Company
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars, shares in thousands)
          
     March 31, December 31,
     2014  2013 
Assets      
          
Current Assets      
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 $ 9  $ 8 
 Accounts receivable (less reserve: 2014, $2; 2013, $2)      
  
Customer
   118    102 
  
Other
   8    9 
 
Unbilled revenues
   63    85 
 
Accounts receivable from affiliates
   23      
 
Fuel, materials and supplies
   110    154 
 
Prepayments
   7    7 
 
Regulatory assets
   22    17 
 
Other current assets
   5    3 
 
Total Current Assets
   365    385 
          
Property, Plant and Equipment      
 
Regulated utility plant
   3,475    3,383 
 
Less: accumulated depreciation - regulated utility plant
   364    332 
  
Regulated utility plant, net
   3,111    3,051 
 
Construction work in progress
   680    651 
 
Property, Plant and Equipment, net
   3,791    3,702 
          
Other Noncurrent Assets      
 
Regulatory assets
   303    303 
 
Goodwill
   389    389 
 
Other intangibles
   114    120 
 
Other noncurrent assets
   33    35 
 
Total Other Noncurrent Assets
   839    847 
          
Total Assets
 $ 4,995  $ 4,934 
          
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.

30



CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
Louisville Gas and Electric Company
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars, shares in thousands)
     March 31, December 31,
     2014  2013 
Liabilities and Equity      
          
Current Liabilities      
 
Short-term debt
 $ 15  $ 20 
 
Accounts payable
   189    166 
 
Accounts payable to affiliates
   17    24 
 
Customer deposits
   24    24 
 
Taxes
   32    11 
 
Price risk management liabilities
   4    4 
 
Regulatory liabilities
   9    9 
 
Interest
   15    6 
 
Other current liabilities
   26    32 
 
Total Current Liabilities
   331    296 
          
Long-term Debt
   1,353    1,353 
       
Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities      
 
Deferred income taxes
   590    582 
 
Investment tax credits
   38    38 
 
Accrued pension obligations
   10    19 
 
Asset retirement obligations
   70    68 
 
Regulatory liabilities
   477    482 
 
Price risk management liabilities
   36    32 
 
Other deferred credits and noncurrent liabilities
   105    104 
 
Total Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities
   1,326    1,325 
          
Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (Notes 6 and 10)      
          
Stockholder's Equity      
 
Common stock - no par value (a)
   424    424 
 
Additional paid-in capital
   1,364    1,364 
 
Earnings reinvested
   197    172 
 
Total Equity
   1,985    1,960 
          
Total Liabilities and Equity
 $ 4,995  $ 4,934 

(a)75,000 shares authorized; 21,294 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.


31


CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
Louisville Gas and Electric Company            
(Unaudited)            
(Millions of Dollars)            
           
  Common            
  stock            
  shares    Additional      
  outstanding Common paid-in Earnings   
  (a) stock capital reinvested Total
               
December 31, 2013
 21,294  $424  $1,364  $172  $1,960 
Net income
           52    52 
Cash dividends declared on common stock
           (27)   (27)
March 31, 2014
 21,294  $424  $1,364  $197  $1,985 
               
December 31, 2012
 21,294  $424  $1,278  $108  $1,810 
Net income
           44    44 
Capital contributions from LKE
        25       25 
Cash dividends declared on common stock
           (19)   (19)
March 31, 2013
 21,294  $ 424  $ 1,303  $ 133  $ 1,860 

16

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
LG&E and KU Energy LLC and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars)
           
     Three Months Ended March 31,
     2015  2014
Cash Flows from Operating Activities       
 Net income $ 117  $ 115
 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities       
  Depreciation   95    86
  Amortization   6    6
  Defined benefit plans - expense   11    8
  Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits   75    74
  Other   17    (1)
 Change in current assets and current liabilities       
  Accounts receivable   (39)    (39)
  Accounts payable   (18)    22
  Unbilled revenues   32    36
  Fuel, materials and supplies   71    53
  Income tax receivable   134    (11)
  Taxes payable   (11)    (14)
  Accrued interest   37    36
  Other   (21)    (24)
 Other operating activities       
  Defined benefit plans - funding   (53)    (38)
  Other assets   (6)    1
  Other liabilities   4    
   Net cash provided by operating activities   451    310
Cash Flows from Investing Activities       
 Expenditures for property, plant and equipment   (321)    (272)
 Net (increase) decrease in notes receivable from affiliates       66
 Other investing activities   4    
   Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities   (317)    (206)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities       
 Net increase (decrease) in notes payable with affiliates   (1)    
 Net increase (decrease) in short-term debt   (91)    (45)
 Distributions to member   (23)    (104)
 Contributions from member       40
   Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities   (115)    (109)
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents   19    (5)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period   21    35
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period $ 40  $ 30

The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.

17

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LG&E and KU Energy LLC and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars)
          
     March 31, December 31,
     2015 2014
Assets      
          
Current Assets      
 Cash and cash equivalents $ 40 $ 21
 Accounts receivable (less reserve: 2015, $26; 2014, $25)      
  Customer   268   231
  Other   14   18
 Unbilled revenues   135   167
 Fuel, materials and supplies   239   311
 Prepayments   23   28
 Income taxes receivable   2   136
 Deferred income taxes   21   16
 Regulatory assets   20   25
 Other current assets   6   3
 Total Current Assets   768   956
          
Property, Plant and Equipment      
 Regulated utility plant   10,069   10,007
 Less: accumulated depreciation - regulated utility plant   1,049   1,067
  Regulated utility plant, net   9,020   8,940
 Other, net   4   5
 Construction work in progress   1,672   1,559
 Property, Plant and Equipment, net   10,696   10,504
          
Other Noncurrent Assets      
 Regulatory assets   719   665
 Goodwill   996   996
 Other intangibles   161   174
 Other noncurrent assets   103   101
 Total Other Noncurrent Assets   1,979   1,936
          
Total Assets $ 13,443 $ 13,396

The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.

18

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LG&E and KU Energy LLC and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars)
     March 31, December 31,
     2015 2014
Liabilities and Equity      
          
Current Liabilities      
 Short-term debt $ 484 $ 575
 Long-term debt due within one year   900   900
 Notes payable with affiliates   40   41
 Accounts payable   350   399
 Accounts payable to affiliates   3   2
 Customer deposits   52   52
 Taxes   25   36
 Price risk management liabilities   5   5
 Price risk management liabilities with affiliates   122   66
 Regulatory liabilities   24   15
 Interest   60   23
 Other current liabilities   115   131
 Total Current Liabilities   2,180   2,245
          
Long-term Debt   3,667   3,667
          
Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities      
 Deferred income taxes   1,324   1,241
 Investment tax credits   130   131
 Accrued pension obligations   256   305
 Asset retirement obligations   266   274
 Regulatory liabilities   961   974
 Price risk management liabilities   47   43
 Other deferred credits and noncurrent liabilities   270   268
 Total Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities   3,254   3,236
          
Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (Notes 6 and 10)      
          
Member's equity   4,342   4,248
          
Total Liabilities and Equity $ 13,443 $ 13,396

The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.

19

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
LG&E and KU Energy LLC and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars)
Member's
Equity
December 31, 2014$ 4,248
Net income 117
Distributions to member (23)
March 31, 2015$ 4,342
December 31, 2013$ 4,150
Net income 115
Contributions from member 40
Distributions to member (104)
Other comprehensive income (loss) (1)
March 31, 2014$ 4,200

The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.

20

(THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY.)

21

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Louisville Gas and Electric Company
(Unaudited)      
(Millions of Dollars)     
          
     Three Months Ended March 31,
     2015 2014
Operating Revenues      
 Retail and wholesale $ 417 $ 442
 Electric revenue from affiliate   22   37
 Total Operating Revenues   439   479
          
Operating Expenses      
 Operation      
  Fuel   103   117
  Energy purchases   88   118
  Energy purchases from affiliate   3   6
  Other operation and maintenance   96   98
 Depreciation   42   38
 Taxes, other than income   7   6
 Total Operating Expenses   339   383
          
Operating Income   100   96
          
Other Income (Expense) - net   (1)   (2)
          
Interest Expense   13   12
      
Income Before Income Taxes   86   82
          
Income Taxes   33   30
          
Net Income (a) $ 53 $ 52

(a)Net income equals comprehensive income.

The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.

22

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Louisville Gas and Electric Company
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars)
           
     Three Months Ended March 31,
     2015  2014
Cash Flows from Operating Activities       
 Net income $ 53  $ 52
 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities       
  Depreciation��  42    38
  Amortization   3    3
  Defined benefit plans - expense   4    2
  Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits   31    6
  Other   14    (5)
 Change in current assets and current liabilities       
  Accounts receivable   (16)    (18)
  Accounts receivable from affiliates   11    (22)
  Accounts payable   (15)    14
  Accounts payable to affiliates       (7)
  Unbilled revenues   18    22
  Fuel, materials and supplies   56    44
  Income tax receivable   74    
  Taxes payable   (7)    21
  Accrued interest   9    9
  Other   (3)    (4)
 Other operating activities       
  Defined benefit plans - funding   (22)    (9)
  Other assets   (1)    1
  Other liabilities       2
   Net cash provided by operating activities   251    149
Cash Flows from Investing Activities       
 Expenditures for property, plant and equipment   (173)    (116)
   Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities   (173)    (116)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities       
 Net increase (decrease) in short-term debt   (48)    (5)
 Payment of common stock dividends to parent   (23)    (27)
   Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities   (71)    (32)
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents   7    1
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period   10    8
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period $ 17  $ 9

The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.

23

CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
Louisville Gas and Electric Company
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars, shares in thousands)
          
     March 31, December 31,
     2015 2014
Assets      
          
Current Assets      
 Cash and cash equivalents $ 17 $ 10
 Accounts receivable (less reserve: 2015, $2; 2014, $2)      
  Customer   121   107
  Other   9   11
 Unbilled revenues   58   76
 Accounts receivable from affiliates   13   23
 Fuel, materials and supplies   105   162
 Prepayments   7   8
 Income taxes receivable      74
 Regulatory assets   12   21
 Other current assets   5   1
 Total Current Assets   347   493
          
Property, Plant and Equipment      
 Regulated utility plant   4,016   4,031
 Less: accumulated depreciation - regulated utility plant   398   456
  Regulated utility plant, net   3,618   3,575
 Construction work in progress   761   676
 Property, Plant and Equipment, net   4,379   4,251
          
Other Noncurrent Assets      
 Regulatory assets   422   397
 Goodwill   389   389
 Other intangibles   91   97
 Other noncurrent assets   36   35
 Total Other Noncurrent Assets   938   918
          
Total Assets $ 5,664 $ 5,662

The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.

24

CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
Louisville Gas and Electric Company
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars, shares in thousands)
     March 31, December 31,
     2015 2014
Liabilities and Equity      
          
Current Liabilities      
 Short-term debt $ 216 $ 264
 Long-term debt due within one year   250   250
 Accounts payable   222   240
 Accounts payable to affiliates   20   20
 Customer deposits   25   25
 Taxes   12   19
 Price risk management liabilities   5   5
 Price risk management liabilities with affiliates   61   33
 Regulatory liabilities   14   10
 Interest   15   6
 Other current liabilities   37   42
 Total Current Liabilities   877   914
          
Long-term Debt   1,103   1,103
       
Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities      
 Deferred income taxes   735   700
 Investment tax credits   36   36
 Accrued pension obligations   34   57
 Asset retirement obligations   64   66
 Regulatory liabilities   454   458
 Price risk management liabilities   47   43
 Other deferred credits and noncurrent liabilities   110   111
 Total Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities   1,480   1,471
          
Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (Notes 6 and 10)      
          
Stockholder's Equity      
 Common stock - no par value (a)   424   424
 Additional paid-in capital   1,521   1,521
 Earnings reinvested   259   229
 Total Equity   2,204   2,174
          
Total Liabilities and Equity $ 5,664 $ 5,662

(a)75,000 shares authorized; 21,294 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.

25

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
Louisville Gas and Electric Company            
(Unaudited)            
(Millions of Dollars)            
                 
    Common            
    stock            
    shares     Additional      
    outstanding  Common  paid-in  Earnings   
    (a)  stock  capital  reinvested  Total
                 
December 31, 2014 21,294 $424 $1,521 $229 $2,174
Net income          53  53
Cash dividends declared on common stock          (23)  (23)
March 31, 2015 21,294 $424 $1,521 $259 $2,204
                 
December 31, 2013 21,294 $424 $1,364 $172 $1,960
Net income          52  52
Cash dividends declared on common stock          (27)  (27)
March 31, 2014  21,294 $424 $1,364 $197 $1,985

(a)Shares in thousands. All common shares of LG&E stock are owned by LKE.

The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.


26
32





















(THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY.)


33


CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Kentucky Utilities Company
(Unaudited)            
(Millions of Dollars)      
                
       Three Months Ended March 31,
          2014   2013 
Operating Revenues            
 
Retail and wholesale
 $ 492  $ 431 
 
Electric revenue from affiliate
   6    1 
 
Total Operating Revenues
   498    432 
                
Operating Expenses      
 Operation      
  
Fuel
   160    135 
  
Energy purchases
   6    6 
  
Energy purchases from affiliate
   37    21 
  
Other operation and maintenance
   98    97 
 
Depreciation
   48    46 
 
Taxes, other than income
   7    6 
 
Total Operating Expenses
   356    311 
                
Operating Income
   142    121 
                
Other Income (Expense) - net
        (1)
                
Interest Expense
   19    17 
                
Income Before Income Taxes
   123    103 
                
Income Taxes
   46    39 
                
Net Income (a)
 $ 77  $ 64 
                
                
(a)    Net income approximates comprehensive income.
                
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.

34


CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Kentucky Utilities Company
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars)
          
  Three Months Ended March 31,
     2014  2013 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities      
 
Net income
 $ 77  $ 64 
 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities      
  
Depreciation
   48    46 
  
Amortization
   3    4 
  
Defined benefit plans - expense
   2    5 
  
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits
   34    35 
  
Other
   2    9 
 Change in current assets and current liabilities      
  
Accounts receivable
   (24)   (31)
  
Accounts payable
   15    32 
  
Accounts payable to affiliates
   16    8 
  
Unbilled revenues
   14    (1)
  
Fuel, materials and supplies
   9    10 
  
Taxes
   (12)   (17)
  
Accrued interest
   18    15 
  
Other
   (9)   (20)
 Other operating activities      
  
Defined benefit plans - funding
   (3)   (60)
  
Other assets
        1 
  
Other liabilities
   1    (15)
   
Net cash provided by operating activities
   191    85 
Cash Flows from Investing Activities      
 
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment
   (154)   (172)
   
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
   (154)   (172)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities      
 
Net increase (decrease) in short-term debt
   (40)   45 
 
Payment of common stock dividends to parent
   (37)   (13)
 
Contributions from parent
   40    50 
   
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
   (37)   82 
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
        (5)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period
   21    21 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period
 $ 21  $ 16 
          
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.

35


CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
Kentucky Utilities Company
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars, shares in thousands)
          
     March 31, December 31,
     2014  2013 
Assets      
          
Current Assets      
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 $ 21  $ 21 
 Accounts receivable (less reserve: 2014, $4; 2013, $4)      
  
Customer
   147    122 
  
Other
   7    9 
 
Unbilled revenues
   81    95 
 
Fuel, materials and supplies
   115    124 
 
Prepayments
   5    4 
 
Regulatory assets
   9    10 
 
Other current assets
   12    6 
 
Total Current Assets
   397    391 
          
Property, Plant and Equipment      
 
Regulated utility plant
   5,208    5,143 
 
Less: accumulated depreciation - regulated utility plant
   485    446 
  
Regulated utility plant, net
   4,723    4,697 
 
Other, net
   1    1 
 
Construction work in progress
   1,185    1,139 
 
Property, Plant and Equipment, net
   5,909    5,837 
          
Other Noncurrent Assets      
 
Regulatory assets
   172    171 
 
Goodwill
   607    607 
 
Other intangibles
   95    101 
 
Other noncurrent assets
   56    56 
 
Total Other Noncurrent Assets
   930    935 
          
Total Assets
 $ 7,236  $ 7,163 
          
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.

36



CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
Kentucky Utilities Company
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars, shares in thousands)
     March 31, December 31,
     2014  2013 
Liabilities and Equity      
          
Current Liabilities      
 
Short-term debt
 $ 110  $ 150 
 
Accounts payable
   140    159 
 
Accounts payable to affiliates
   41    25 
 
Customer deposits
   26    26 
 
Taxes
   21    33 
 
Regulatory liabilities
   3    5 
 
Interest
   29    11 
 
Other current liabilities
   30    36 
 
Total Current Liabilities
   400    445 
          
Long-term Debt
   2,091    2,091 
       
Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities      
 
Deferred income taxes
   699    658 
 
Investment tax credits
   96    97 
 
Accrued pension obligations
   9    11 
 
Asset retirement obligations
   181    177 
 
Regulatory liabilities
   547    551 
 
Other deferred credits and noncurrent liabilities
   90    89 
 
Total Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities
   1,622    1,583 
          
Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (Notes 6 and 10)      
          
Stockholder's Equity      
 
Common stock - no par value (a)
   308    308 
 
Additional paid-in capital
   2,545    2,505 
 
Accumulated other comprehensive income
        1 
 
Earnings reinvested
   270    230 
 
Total Equity
   3,123    3,044 
          
Total Liabilities and Equity
 $ 7,236  $ 7,163 

27
(a)80,000 shares authorized; 37,818 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Kentucky Utilities Company
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars)
          
     Three Months Ended March 31,
     2015 2014
Operating Revenues      
 Retail and wholesale $ 482 $ 492
 Electric revenue from affiliate   3   6
 Total Operating Revenues   485   498
          
Operating Expenses      
 Operation      
  Fuel   150   160
  Energy purchases   4   6
  Energy purchases from affiliate   22   37
  Other operation and maintenance   104   98
 Depreciation   53   48
 Taxes, other than income   7   7
 Total Operating Expenses   340   356
          
Operating Income   145   142
          
Other Income (Expense) - net   (1)   
          
Interest Expense   19   19
          
Income Before Income Taxes   125   123
          
Income Taxes   47   46
          
Net Income (a) $ 78 $ 77

(a)Net income approximates comprehensive income.

The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.


37


CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
Kentucky Utilities Company            
(Unaudited)            
(Millions of Dollars)            
             
  Common          Accumulated   
  stock          other   
  shares    Additional    comprehensive   
  outstanding Common paid-in Earnings income   
  (a) stock capital reinvested (loss) Total
                  
December 31, 2013
 37,818  $308  $2,505  $230  $ $3,044 
Net income
           77       77 
Capital contributions from LKE
        40          40 
Cash dividends declared on common                 
  stock
           (37)      (37)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
              (1)   (1)
March 31, 2014
 37,818  $308  $2,545  $270  $  $3,123 
                  
December 31, 2012
 37,818  $308  $2,348  $126  $ 1  $2,783 
Net income
           64       64 
Capital contributions from LKE
        50          50 
Cash dividends declared on common                 
  stock
           (13)      (13)
March 31, 2013
 37,818  $ 308  $ 2,398  $ 177  $ 1  $ 2,884 

28
(a)Shares in thousands.  All common shares of KU stock are owned by LKE.

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Kentucky Utilities Company
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars)
           
     Three Months Ended March 31,
     2015  2014
Cash Flows from Operating Activities       
 Net income $ 78  $ 77
 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities       
  Depreciation   53    48
  Amortization   3    3
  Defined benefit plans - expense   3    2
  Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits   43    34
  Other   2    2
 Change in current assets and current liabilities       
  Accounts receivable   (25)    (24)
  Accounts payable   1    15
  Accounts payable to affiliates   (14)    16
  Unbilled revenues   14    14
  Fuel, materials and supplies   15    9
  Income tax receivable   60    
  Taxes payable   (1)    (12)
  Accrued interest   19    18
  Other   (5)    (9)
 Other operating activities       
  Defined benefit plans - funding   (15)    (3)
  Other assets   (3)    
  Other liabilities   1    1
   Net cash provided by operating activities   229    191
Cash Flows from Investing Activities       
 Expenditures for property, plant and equipment   (148)    (154)
 Other investing activities   4    
   Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities   (144)    (154)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities       
 Net increase (decrease) in short-term debt   (43)    (40)
 Payment of common stock dividends to parent   (30)    (37)
 Contributions from parent       40
   Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities   (73)    (37)
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents   12    
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period   11    21
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period $ 23  $ 21

The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.


29

CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
Kentucky Utilities Company
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars, shares in thousands)
          
     March 31, December 31,
     2015 2014
Assets      
          
Current Assets      
 Cash and cash equivalents $ 23 $ 11
 Accounts receivable (less reserve: 2015, $3; 2014, $2)      
  Customer   147   124
  Other   5   6
 Unbilled revenues   77   91
 Fuel, materials and supplies   134   149
 Prepayments   7   10
 Income taxes receivable      60
 Regulatory assets   8   4
 Other current assets   11   4
 Total Current Assets   412   459
          
Property, Plant and Equipment      
 Regulated utility plant   6,053   5,976
 Less: accumulated depreciation - regulated utility plant   651   611
  Regulated utility plant, net   5,402   5,365
 Other, net   1   1
 Construction work in progress   908   880
 Property, Plant and Equipment, net   6,311   6,246
          
Other Noncurrent Assets      
 Regulatory assets   297   268
 Goodwill   607   607
 Other intangibles   70   77
 Other noncurrent assets   57   58
 Total Other Noncurrent Assets   1,031   1,010
          
Total Assets $ 7,754 $ 7,715

The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.

38
30

CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
Kentucky Utilities Company
(Unaudited)
(Millions of Dollars, shares in thousands)
     March 31, December 31,
     2015 2014
Liabilities and Equity      
          
Current Liabilities      
 Short-term debt $ 193 $ 236
 Long-term debt due within one year   250   250
 Accounts payable   114   141
 Accounts payable to affiliates   33   47
 Customer deposits   27   27
 Taxes   13   14
 Price risk management liabilities with affiliates   61   33
 Regulatory liabilities   10   5
 Interest   30   11
 Other current liabilities   48   41
 Total Current Liabilities   779   805
          
Long-term Debt   1,841   1,841
          
Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities      
 Deferred income taxes   933   884
 Investment tax credits   94   95
 Accrued pension obligations   44   59
 Asset retirement obligations   202   208
 Regulatory liabilities   507   516
 Other deferred credits and noncurrent liabilities   101   101
 Total Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities   1,881   1,863
          
Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (Notes 6 and 10)      
          
Stockholder's Equity      
 Common stock - no par value (a)   308   308
 Additional paid-in capital   2,596   2,596
 Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)   (1)   
 Earnings reinvested   350   302
 Total Equity   3,253   3,206
          
Total Liabilities and Equity $ 7,754 $ 7,715

(a)80,000 shares authorized; 37,818 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.

31

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
Kentucky Utilities Company            
(Unaudited)            
(Millions of Dollars)            
                  
  Common          Accumulated   
  stock          other   
  shares    Additional    comprehensive   
  outstanding Common paid-in Earnings income   
  (a) stock capital reinvested (loss) Total
                  
December 31, 2014 37,818 $308 $2,596 $302    $3,206
Net income          78     78
Cash dividends declared on common stock           (30)      (30)
Other comprehensive income (loss)            $(1)  (1)
March 31, 2015 37,818 $308 $2,596 $350 $(1) $3,253
                  
December 31, 2013 37,818 $308 $2,505 $230 $1 $3,044
Net income          77      77
Capital contributions from LKE       40         40
Cash dividends declared on common stock          (37)     (37)
Other comprehensive income (loss)              (1)  (1)
March 31, 2014 37,818 $308 $2,545 $270 $  $ 3,123

(a)Shares in thousands. All common shares of KU stock are owned by LKE.

The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.

32

Combined Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)



1. Interim Financial Statements


(All Registrants)


Capitalized terms and abbreviations appearing in the unaudited combined notes to condensed financial statements are defined in the glossary. Dollars are in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise noted. The specific Registrant to which disclosures are applicable is identified in parenthetical headings in italics above the applicable disclosure or within the applicable disclosure for their related activities and disclosures. Within combined disclosures, amounts are disclosed for any Registrant when significant.


The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X and, therefore, do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation in accordance with GAAP are reflected in the condensed financial statements. All adjustments are of a normal recurring nature, except as otherwise disclosed. Each Registrant's Balance Sheet at December 31, 20132014 is derived from that Registrant's 20132014 audited Balance Sheet. The financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes contained in each Registrant's 20132014 Form 10-K. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2014,2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2014,2015 or other future periods, because results for interim periods can be disproportionately influenced by various factors, developments and seasonal variations.


The classification of certain prior period amounts has been changed to conform to the presentation in the March 31, 20142015 financial statements.


(PPL)

"Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations (net of income taxes)" on the Statements of Income includes the activities of PPL Montana's hydroelectric generating facilities sold in the fourth quarter of 2014. See Note 8 for additional information. The Statements of Cash Flows do not separately report the cash flows of the Discontinued Operations.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies


(All Registrants)


The following accounting policy disclosures represent updates to Note 1 in each Registrant's 20132014 Form 10-K and should be read in conjunction with those disclosures.


Accounts Receivable(PPL PPL Energy Supply and PPL Electric)


In accordance with a PUC-approved purchase of accounts receivable program, PPL Electric purchases certain accounts receivable from alternative electricity suppliers (including PPL EnergyPlus) at a discount, which reflects a provision for uncollectible accounts. The alternative electricity suppliers have no continuing involvement or interest in the purchased accounts receivable. The purchased accounts receivable are initially recorded at fair value using a market approach based on the purchase price paid and are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, PPL Electric purchased $331 million of accounts receivable from unaffiliated third parties and $93 million from PPL EnergyPlus. During the three months ended March 31, 2014, PPL Electric purchased $362 million of accounts receivable from unaffiliated third parties and $105 million from PPL EnergyPlus.  During

Depreciation (PPL)

Effective January 1, 2015, after completing a review of the useful lives of its distribution network assets, WPD extended the weighted average useful lives of these assets to 69 years from 55 years. For the three months ended March 31, 2013, PPL Electric purchased $2592015, this change in useful lives resulted in lower depreciation of $20 million of accounts receivable from unaffiliated third parties and $77($16 million from PPL EnergyPlus.after-tax or $0.02 per share).

33

New Accounting Guidance Adopted(All Registrants)


Accounting for Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements

Reporting of Discontinued Operations

Effective January 1, 2014,2015, the Registrants retrospectively adopted accounting guidance for the recognition, measurement and disclosure of certain obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements when the amount of the obligation is fixed at the reporting date.  If the obligation is determined to be in the scope of this guidance, it will be measured as the sum of the amount the reporting entity agreed to pay on the basis of its arrangements among its co-obligors and any additional amount the reporting entity expects to pay on behalf of its co-obligors.  This guidance also requires additional disclosures for these obligations.


The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Registrants.


39


Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity

Effective January 1, 2014, PPL prospectively adopted accounting guidance that requireschanges the criteria for determining what should be classified as a cumulative translation adjustmentdiscontinued operation and the related presentation and disclosure requirements. A discontinued operation may include a component of an entity or a group of components of an entity, or a business activity.

A disposal of a component of an entity or a group of components of an entity is required to be released into earningsreported in discontinued operations if the disposal represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on the entity's operations and financial results when any of the following occurs: (1) The components of an entity ceases to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets within a consolidated foreigncomponents of an entity andmeets the criteria to be classified as held for sale, (2) The component of an entity or group of components of an entity is disposed of by sale, or transfer results(3) The component of an entity or group of components of an entity is disposed of other than by sale (for example, by abandonment or in the complete or substantially complete liquidation of the foreign entity.  For the step acquisition of previously held equity method investments that are foreign entities, this guidance clarifies that the amount of accumulated other comprehensive income that is reclassified and includeda distribution to owners in the calculation of a gain or loss shall include any foreign currency translation adjustment related to that previously held investment.


spinoff).

The initial adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on PPL; however, the impact in future periods could be material. 


Presentation of Unrecognized Tax Benefits When Net Operating Loss Carryforwards, Similar Tax Losses, or Tax Credit Carryforwards Exist

Effective January 1, 2014, the Registrants prospectively adopted accounting guidance that requires an unrecognized tax benefit,but will impact the amounts presented as discontinued operations and will enhance the related disclosure requirements related to future disposals or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, to be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax assetheld for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward.  To the extent a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position, or the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction does not require the entity to use, and the entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets.

The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Registrants.

sale classifications.

3. Segment and Related Information


(PPL)


See Note 2 in PPL's 20132014 Form 10-K for a discussion of reportable segments and related information.


In June 2014, PPL and PPL Energy Supply, which substantially represents PPL's Supply segment, executed definitive agreements with affiliates of Riverstone to combine their competitive power generation businesses into a new, stand-alone, publicly traded company named Talen Energy. The transaction is expected to occur on June 1, 2015. Upon completion of this transaction, PPL will no longer have a Supply segment. See Note 8 for additional information.

Financial data for the segments and reconciliation to PPL's consolidated results for the periods ended March 31 are:


            Three Months
      2014  2013 
Income Statement Data            
Revenues from external customers            
 U.K. Regulated       $ 648  $ 648 
 Kentucky Regulated         934    800 
 Pennsylvania Regulated         591    512 
 Supply (a)         (953)   494 
 Corporate and Other         3    3 
Total       $ 1,223  $ 2,457 
                 
Intersegment electric revenues            
 Supply       $ 27  $ 14 
                 
Net Income Attributable to PPL Shareowners            
 U.K. Regulated       $ 206  $ 313 
 Kentucky Regulated         107    85 
 Pennsylvania Regulated         85    64 
 Supply (a)         (75)   (46)
 Corporate and Other         (7)   (3)
Total       $ 316  $ 413 


40



   March 31, December 31,
   2014  2013 
Balance Sheet Data      
Assets      
 U.K. Regulated $ 16,535  $ 15,895 
 Kentucky Regulated   12,037    12,016 
 Pennsylvania Regulated   7,022    6,846 
 Supply   12,237    11,408 
 Corporate and Other (b)   142    94 
Total assets $ 47,973  $ 46,259 

        Three Months
      2015 2014
Income Statement Data            
Revenues from external customers            
 U.K. Regulated       $ 697 $ 648
 Kentucky Regulated         899   934
 Pennsylvania Regulated         630   591
 Supply (a)         937   (982)
 Corporate and Other         2   3
Total       $ 3,165 $ 1,194
                 
Intersegment electric revenues            
 Supply       $ 9 $ 27
                 
Net Income            
 U.K. Regulated (a)       $ 375 $ 206
 Kentucky Regulated         109   107
 Pennsylvania Regulated         87   85
 Supply (a)         95   (75)
 Corporate and Other (b)         (19)   (7)
Total       $ 647 $ 316

   March 31, December 31,
   2015 2014
Balance Sheet Data      
Assets      
 U.K. Regulated $ 16,275 $ 16,005
 Kentucky Regulated   13,109   13,062
 Pennsylvania Regulated   7,921   7,785
 Supply   10,631   11,025
 Corporate and Other (c)   985   987
Total assets $ 48,921 $ 48,864

(a)Includes unrealized gains and losses from economic activity. See Note 14 for additional information.
(b)2015 includes most of the transaction and transition costs related to the anticipated spinoff of PPL Energy Supply. See Note 8 for additional information.
(c)Primarily consists of unallocated items, including cash, PP&E and the elimination of inter-segment transactions.
34

4. Earnings Per Share


(PPL)


Basic EPS is computed by dividing income available to PPL common shareowners by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the applicable period. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing income available to PPL common shareowners by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, increased by incremental shares that would be outstanding if potentially dilutive non-participating securities were converted to common shares as calculated using the Treasury Stock methodMethod or the If-Converted Method, as applicable. Incremental non-participating securities that have a dilutive impact are detailed in the table below.


Reconciliations of the amounts of income and shares of PPL common stock (in thousands) for the periodsperiod ended March 31 used in the EPS calculation are:


           Three Months
         2014  2013 
Income (Numerator)            
Net income attributable to PPL shareowners       $ 316  $ 413 
Less amounts allocated to participating securities         2    2 
Net income available to PPL common shareowners - Basic         314    411 
Plus interest charges (net of tax) related to Equity Units (a)     9    15 
Net income available to PPL common shareowners - Diluted       $ 323  $ 426 
                
Shares of Common Stock (Denominator)            
Weighted-average shares - Basic EPS         630,749    582,640 
Add incremental non-participating securities:            
  Share-based payment awards         1,511    810 
  Equity Units (a)         31,679    71,990 
  Forward sale agreements              1,580 
Weighted-average shares - Diluted EPS         663,939    657,020 
                
Basic EPS            
  Net Income Available to PPL common shareowners       $ 0.50  $ 0.70 
                
Diluted EPS            
  Net Income Available to PPL common shareowners       $ 0.49  $ 0.65 

       Three Months
         2015 2014
Income (Numerator)            
Income from continuing operations after income taxes $ 647 $ 324
Less amounts allocated to participating securities         3   2
Income from continuing operations after income taxes available to PPL common shareowners - Basic   644   322
Plus interest charges (net of tax) related to Equity Units (a)            9
Income from continuing operations after income taxes available to PPL common shareowners - Diluted $ 644 $ 331
                
Income (loss) from discontinued operations (net of income taxes) available to PPL common shareowners - Basic      
and Diluted $  $ (8)
                
Net income       $ 647 $ 316
Less amounts allocated to participating securities         3   2
Net income available to PPL common shareowners - Basic         644   314
Plus interest charges (net of tax) related to Equity Units (a)            9
Net income available to PPL common shareowners - Diluted       $ 644 $ 323
                
Shares of Common Stock (Denominator)            
Weighted-average shares - Basic EPS         666,974   630,749
Add incremental non-participating securities:            
  Share-based payment awards         1,758   1,511
  Equity Units (a)            31,679
Weighted-average shares - Diluted EPS         668,732   663,939
                
Basic EPS            
Available to PPL common shareowners:            
  Income from continuing operations after income taxes       $ 0.97 $ 0.51
  Income (loss) from discontinued operations (net of income taxes)            (0.01)
  Net Income Available to PPL common shareowners       $ 0.97 $ 0.50
                
Diluted EPS            
Available to PPL common shareowners:            
  Income from continuing operations after income taxes       $ 0.96 $ 0.50
  Income (loss) from discontinued operations (net of income taxes)            (0.01)
  Net Income Available to PPL common shareowners       $ 0.96 $ 0.49

(a)TheIn 2014, the If-Converted Method has beenwas applied to the Equity Units prior to settlement.  See Note 7 for additional information on the 2011 Equity Units, including the issuance of PPL common stock on May 1,March 2014 to settle the 2011 Purchase Contracts.settlement.

For the periods ended March 31, PPL issued common stock related to stock-based compensation plans ESOP and DRIP as follows (in thousands):


   Three Months
     2014   2013 
Stock-based compensation plans (a)   1,096    446 
ESOP        275 
DRIP        549 

    Three Months
        2015 2014
               
Stock-based compensation plans (a)         1,445   1,096
DRIP         419   

(a)Includes stock options exercised, vesting of performance units, vesting of restricted stock and restricted stock units and conversion of stock units granted to directors.

41


For the periods ended March 31, the following shares (in thousands) were excluded from the computations of diluted EPS because the effect would have been antidilutive.

35

        Three Months
      2014  2013 
             
Stock options         2,540    6,589 
Performance units              206 
Restricted stock units         123    116 

    Three Months
      2015 2014
             
Stock options         1,473   2,540
Performance units         146   
Restricted stock units            123

5. Income Taxes


Reconciliations of income taxes for the periods ended March 31 are:

(PPL)
                 
        Three Months
          2015 2014
             
Federal income tax on Income from Continuing Operations Before            
 Income Taxes at statutory tax rate - 35%       $ 320 $ 153
Increase (decrease) due to:            
  State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit         25   3
  Valuation allowance adjustments         3   
  Impact of lower U.K. income tax rates         (62)   (44)
  U.S. income tax on foreign earnings - net of foreign tax credit         (1)   11
  Intercompany interest on U.K. financing entities         (8)   (2)
  Other         (9)   (7)
   Total increase (decrease)         (52)   (39)
Total income taxes       $ 268 $ 114

(PPL Electric)            
             
        Three Months
          2015 2014
                 
             
Federal income tax on Income Before Income Taxes at statutory tax rate - 35%       $ 51 $ 48
Increase (decrease) due to:            
  State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit         10   8
  Other         (2)   (3)
   Total increase (decrease)         8   5
Total income taxes       $ 59 $ 53

(LKE)              
                 
        Three Months
          2015 2014
             
Federal income tax on Income Before Income Taxes at statutory tax rate - 35%       $ 68 $ 64
Increase (decrease) due to:            
  State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit         7   7
  Valuation allowance adjustments         3   
  Other         (2)   (2)
   Total increase (decrease)         8   5
Total income taxes       $ 76 $ 69

(LG&E)            
                 
        Three Months
          2015 2014
             
Federal income tax on Income Before Income Taxes at statutory tax rate - 35%       $ 30 $ 29
Increase (decrease) due to:            
  State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit         3   3
  Other            (2)
   Total increase (decrease)         3   1
Total income taxes       $ 33 $ 30
36

(PPL)
                
       Three Months
         2014  2013 
Federal income tax on Income Before Income Taxes at statutory tax rate - 35% $ 150  $ 197 
Increase (decrease) due to:            
 State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit         2    3 
 Impact of lower U.K. income tax rates         (45)   (38)
 U.S. income tax on foreign earnings - net of foreign tax credit         11    2 
 Federal income tax credits, excluding foreign tax credit         (1)   (4)
 Amortization of investment tax credit         (2)   (3)
 Depreciation not normalized         (2)   (3)
 Other         (1)   (3)
   Total increase (decrease)         (38)   (46)
Total income taxes       $ 112  $ 151 

(PPL Energy Supply)            
                
       Three Months
         2014  2013 
Federal income tax on Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes at statutory tax rate - 35% $ (40) $ (26)
Increase (decrease) due to:            
 State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit         (9)   (6)
 Federal income tax credits         (1)   (3)
 Other         1      
   Total increase (decrease)         (9)   (9)
Total income taxes       $ (49) $ (35)

(PPL Electric)            
                
       Three Months
         2014  2013 
Federal income tax on Income Before Income Taxes at statutory tax rate - 35% $ 48  $ 34 
Increase (decrease) due to:            
 State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit         8    5 
 Federal and state tax reserve adjustments              (2)
 Depreciation not normalized         (2)   (3)
 Other         (1)   (1)
   Total increase (decrease)         5    (1)
Total income taxes       $ 53  $ 33 

(LKE)            
                
       Three Months
         2014  2013 
Federal income tax on Income Before Income Taxes at statutory tax rate - 35%     $ 64  $ 54 
Increase (decrease) due to:            
 State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit         7    5 
 Other         (2)   (2)
   Total increase (decrease)         5    3 
Total income taxes       $ 69  $ 57 


42



(LG&E)            
                
       Three Months
         2014  2013 
Federal income tax on Income Before Income Taxes at statutory tax rate - 35%    $ 29  $ 24 
Increase (decrease) due to:            
 State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit         3    3 
 Other         (2)   (2)
   Total increase (decrease)         1    1 
Total income taxes       $ 30  $ 25 

(KU)            
                
       Three Months
         2014  2013 
Federal income tax on Income Before Income Taxes at statutory tax rate - 35%    $ 43  $ 36 
Increase (decrease) due to:            
 State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit         4    4 
 Other         (1)   (1)
   Total increase (decrease)         3    3 
Total income taxes       $ 46  $ 39 

(KU)            
                 
        Three Months
          2015 2014
             
Federal income tax on Income Before Income Taxes at statutory tax rate - 35%       $ 44 $ 43
Increase (decrease) due to:            
  State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit         4   4
  Other         (1)   (1)
   Total increase (decrease)         3   3
Total income taxes       $ 47 $ 46

Other(PPL)

In February 2015, PPL and the IRS Appeals division reached a settlement on the amount of PPL's refund from its open audits for the years 1998 - 2011. The settlement was required to be reviewed and approved by the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) before it is considered final. In April 2015, PPL was notified that the JCT approved PPL's settlement.  Subject to a final determination of interest on the refund, PPL expects to record a tax benefit in the range of $20 million to $30 million in the second quarter of 2015 related to the settlement of previously unrecognized tax benefits.

6. Utility Rate Regulation


(All Registrants except PPL Energy Supply)


Registrants)

The following table provides information about the regulatory assets and liabilities of cost-based rate-regulated utility operations.

   PPL PPL Electric
   March 31, December 31, March 31, December 31,
   2015 2014 2015 2014
              
Current Regulatory Assets:            
 Environmental cost recovery $ 10 $ 5      
 Gas supply clause   1   15      
 Fuel adjustment clause   4   4      
 Transmission service charge      6    $ 6
 Other   8   7 $ 3   6
Total current regulatory assets $ 23 $ 37 $ 3 $ 12
              
Noncurrent Regulatory Assets:            
 Defined benefit plans $ 705 $ 720 $ 367 $ 372
 Taxes recoverable through future rates   317   316   317   316
 Storm costs   116   124   42   46
 Unamortized loss on debt   76   77   48   49
 Interest rate swaps   182   122      
 Accumulated cost of removal of utility plant   117   114   117   114
 AROs   87   79      
 Other   10   10      
Total noncurrent regulatory assets $ 1,610 $ 1,562 $ 891 $ 897

Current Regulatory Liabilities:            
 Generation supply charge $ 26 $ 28 $ 26 $ 28
 Demand side management   13   2      
 Gas supply clause   6   6      
 Transmission formula rate   49   42   49   42
 Storm damage expense   7   3   7   3
 Gas line tracker   2   3      
 Other   6   7   3   3
Total current regulatory liabilities $ 109 $ 91 $ 85 $ 76
              
Noncurrent Regulatory Liabilities:            
 Accumulated cost of removal of utility plant $ 695 $ 693      
 Coal contracts (a)   49   59      
 Power purchase agreement - OVEC (a)   90   92      
 Net deferred tax assets   25   26      
 Act 129 compliance rider   26   18 $ 26 $ 18
 Defined benefit plans   16   16      
 Interest rate swaps   84   84      
 Other   2   4      
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities $ 987 $ 992 $ 26 $ 18

   PPL PPL Electric
   March 31, December 31, March 31, December 31,
   2014  2013  2014  2013 
              
Current Regulatory Assets:            
 Environmental cost recovery      $ 7           
 Gas supply clause $ 19    10           
 Fuel adjustment clause   10    2           
 Demand side management   1    8           
 Other   2    6  $ 1  $ 6 
Total current regulatory assets $ 32  $ 33  $ 1  $ 6 
              
Noncurrent Regulatory Assets:            
 Defined benefit plans $ 503  $ 509  $ 255  $ 257 
 Taxes recoverable through future rates   307    306    307    306 
 Storm costs   141    147    51    53 
 Unamortized loss on debt   82    85    54    57 
 Interest rate swaps   48    44       
 Accumulated cost of removal of utility plant   101    98    101    98 
 AROs   51    44       
 Other   12    13    2    1 
Total noncurrent regulatory assets $ 1,245  $ 1,246  $ 770  $ 772 

Current Regulatory Liabilities:            
 Generation supply charge $ 25  $ 23  $ 25  $ 23 
 Environmental cost recovery   3            
 Gas supply clause   2    3       
 Transmission service charge   10    8    10    8 
 Fuel adjustment clause        4       
 Transmission formula rate   27    20    27    20 
 Universal service rider   5    10    5    10 
 Storm damage expense      14       14 
 Gas line tracker   7    6       
 Other   1    2    1    1 
Total current regulatory liabilities $ 80  $ 90  $ 68  $ 76 
              

43



   PPL PPL Electric
   March 31, December 31, March 31, December 31,
   2014  2013  2014  2013 
Noncurrent Regulatory Liabilities:            
 Accumulated cost of removal of utility plant $ 692  $ 688       
 Coal contracts (a)   88    98       
 Power purchase agreement - OVEC (a)   98    100       
 Net deferred tax assets   30    30       
 Act 129 compliance rider   13    15  $ 13  $ 15 
 Defined benefit plans   26    26       
 Interest rate swaps   86    86       
 Other   4    5       
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities $ 1,037  $ 1,048  $ 13  $ 15 

   LKE LG&E KU
   March 31, December 31, March 31, December 31, March 31, December 31,
   2014  2013  2014  2013  2014  2013 
                    
Current Regulatory Assets:                  
 Environmental cost recovery      $ 7       $ 2       $ 5 
 Gas supply clause $ 19    10  $ 19    10           
 Fuel adjustment clause   10    2    2    2  $ 8      
 Demand side management   1    8    1    3         5 
 Other   1                   1      
Total current regulatory assets $ 31  $ 27  $ 22  $ 17  $ 9  $ 10 
                    
Noncurrent Regulatory Assets:                  
 Defined benefit plans $ 248  $ 252  $ 161  $ 164  $ 87  $ 88 
 Storm costs   90    94    49    51    41    43 
 Unamortized loss on debt   28    28    18    18    10    10 
 Interest rate swaps   48    44    48    44           
 AROs   51    44    23    21    28    23 
 Other   10    12    4    5    6    7 
Total noncurrent regulatory assets $ 475  $ 474  $ 303  $ 303  $ 172  $ 171 

Current Regulatory Liabilities:                  
  Environmental cost recovery $ 3                 $ 3      
  Gas supply clause   2  $ 3  $ 2  $ 3           
  Fuel adjustment clause        4                 $ 4 
  Gas line tracker   7    6    7    6           
  Other        1                   1 
Total current regulatory liabilities $ 12  $ 14  $ 9  $ 9  $ 3  $ 5 
                     
Noncurrent Regulatory Liabilities:                  
 Accumulated cost of removal                  
  of utility plant $ 692  $ 688  $ 301  $ 299  $ 391  $ 389 
 Coal contracts (a)   88    98    38    43    50    55 
 Power purchase agreement - OVEC (a)   98    100    68    69    30    31 
 Net deferred tax assets   30    30    25    26    5    4 
 Defined benefit plans   26    26              26    26 
 Interest rate swaps   86    86    43    43    43    43 
 Other   4    5    2    2    2    3 
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities $ 1,024  $ 1,033  $ 477  $ 482  $ 547  $ 551 

37

   LKE LG&E KU
   March 31, December 31, March 31, December 31, March 31, December 31,
   2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014
                    
Current Regulatory Assets:                  
 Environmental cost recovery $ 10 $ 5 $ 7 $ 4 $ 3 $ 1
 Gas supply clause   1   15   1   15      
 Fuel adjustment clause   4   4   4   2      2
 Other   5   1         5   1
Total current regulatory assets $ 20 $ 25 $ 12 $ 21 $ 8 $ 4
                    
Noncurrent Regulatory Assets:                  
 Defined benefit plans $ 338 $ 348 $ 208 $ 215 $ 130 $ 133
 Storm costs   74   78   41   43   33   35
 Unamortized loss on debt   28   28   18   18   10   10
 Interest rate swaps   182   122   121   89   61   33
 AROs   87   79   30   28   57   51
 Other   10   10   4   4   6   6
Total noncurrent regulatory assets $ 719 $ 665 $ 422 $ 397 $ 297 $ 268

Current Regulatory Liabilities:                  
  Demand side management $ 13 $ 2 $ 5 $ 1 $ 8 $ 1
  Gas supply clause   6   6   6   6      
  Gas line tracker   2   3   2   3      
  Other   3   4   1      2   4
Total current regulatory liabilities $ 24 $ 15 $ 14 $ 10 $ 10 $ 5
                     
Noncurrent Regulatory Liabilities:                  
 Accumulated cost of removal                  
  of utility plant $ 695 $ 693 $ 304 $ 302 $ 391 $ 391
 Coal contracts (a)   49   59   21   25   28   34
 Power purchase agreement - OVEC (a)   90   92   62   63   28   29
 Net deferred tax assets   25   26   24   24   1   2
 Defined benefit plans   16   16         16   16
 Interest rate swaps   84   84   42   42   42   42
 Other   2   4   1   2   1   2
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities $ 961 $ 974 $ 454 $ 458 $ 507 $ 516

(a)These liabilities were recorded as offsets to certain intangible assets that were recorded at fair value upon the acquisition of LKE by PPL.

Regulatory Matters


U. K. Activities(PPL)

U.K. ActivitiesRIIO-ED1(PPL)


On April 1, 2015, the RIIO-ED1 eight-year price control period commenced for WPD's four DNOs. See "Item 1. Business - Segment Information - U. K. Regulated Segment" of PPL's 2014 Form 10-K for additional information on RIIO-ED1.

Ofgem Review of Line Loss Calculation


In March 2014, Ofgem issued its final decision on the DPCR4 line loss incentives and penalties mechanism. As a result, during the first quarter of 2014 WPD increased its existing liability by $65 million for over-recovery of line losses with a reduction to "Utility" revenuerevenues on the Statement of Income. The total recorded liability at March 31, 2014 was $1152015 of $97 million nearly all of which will be refunded to customers from April 1, 2015 through March 31, 2019.  The recorded liability at December 31, 2013 was $74 million.  Other activity impacting the liability included reductions in the liability that have been included in tariffs during the


44


first quarter of 2014 and foreign exchange movements.  PPL is considering what, if any, recourse may be available to seek review of the final decision.

Kentucky Activities(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)


CPCN Filings

In JanuaryKU)

Rate Case Proceedings

On November 26, 2014, LG&E and KU filed an application for a CPCNrequests with the KPSC requesting approval to build a NGCC generating unit atfor increases in annual base electricity rates for LG&E's electric and gas operations and KU's Green River generating site and a solar generating facility at the E. W. Brown generating site.  The proceeding is currently in the discovery phase and a hearing is scheduled for July 2014.  Inelectric operations. On April 2014,20, 2015, LG&E and KU, and the other parties to the proceeding, filed a motion to hold further proceedingsunanimous settlement agreement with the KPSC. Among other things, the proposed settlement provides for increases in abeyance for up to 90 days in order to allow the companies to assess the potential impactannual revenue requirements associated with KU base electric rates of certain events$125 million and LG&E base gas rates of $7 million. The annual revenue requirement associated with base electric rates at LG&E will not increase. The settlement did not establish a specific return on their future capacity needs, including the recent receipt of termination notices to be generally effective in 2019 from certain KU municipal wholesale customers.  See "Federal Matters - FERC Formula Rates" below for additional information relatingequity with respect to the municipal wholesale customers.base rates, however an authorized 10% return on equity will be utilized in the ECR and GLT mechanisms. The settlement agreement provides for deferred recovery of

38

costs associated with Green River Units 3 and 4 through their retirement. The new regulatory asset will be amortized over three years. The settlement also provides regulatory asset treatment for the difference between pension expense currently booked in accordance with LG&E and KU's pension accounting policy and such an expense using a 15 year amortization period for actuarial gains and losses. The proposed settlement remains subject to KPSC approval. If approved, the new rates and all elements of the settlement would be effective July 1, 2015.

Pennsylvania Activities((PPL and PPL Electric)Electric)


Rate Case Proceeding

On March 31, 2015, PPL Electric filed a request with the PUC for an increase in its annual distribution revenue requirement of approximately $167.5 million.  The proposal would result in a rate increase of 3.9% on a total bill basis and is expected to become effective on January 1, 2016.  PPL Electric's application includes a request for an authorized return-on-equity of 10.95%.  The application is based on a fully projected future test year of January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016. PPL Electric cannot predict the outcome of this proceeding.

Distribution System Improvement Charge (DSIC)

Act 11 authorizes the PUC to approve two specific ratemaking mechanisms: the use of a fully projected future test year in base rate proceedings and, subject to certain conditions, the use of a DSIC. Such alternative ratemaking procedures and mechanisms provide opportunity for accelerated cost-recovery and, therefore, are important to PPL Electric as it is in a period of significant capital investment to maintain and enhance the reliability of its delivery system, including the replacement of aging distribution assets.

On March 31, 2015, PPL Electric filed a petition requesting a waiver of the DSIC cap of 5% of billed revenues and approval to increase the maximum allowable DSIC from 5% to 7.5% for service rendered after January 1, 2016. PPL Electric filed the petition concurrently with its 2015 rate case and is requesting that the PUC consolidate these two proceedings. PPL Electric cannot predict the outcome of this proceeding.

Storm Damage Expense Rider


(SDER)

In its December 28, 2012 final rate case order, the PUC directed PPL Electric to file a proposed Storm Damage Expense Rider (SDER).SDER. The SDER is a reconcilable automatic adjustment clause under which PPL Electric annually will compare actual storm costs to storm costs allowed in base rates and refund or recoup any differences from customers. In March 2013, PPL Electric filed its proposed SDER with the PUC and, as part of that filing, requested recovery of the 2012 qualifying storm costs related to Hurricane Sandy. PPL Electric proposed that the SDER become effective January 1, 2013 at a zero rate with qualifying storm costs incurred in 2013 and the 2012 Hurricane Sandy costs included in rates effective January 1, 2014. As of December 31, 2013, PPL Electric had a $14 million regulatory liability balance for amounts expected to be refunded to customers for revenues collected to cover storm costs in excess of actual storm costs incurred during 2013.  OnIn April 3, 2014, the PUC issued a final order approving the SDER.  The SDER will be effectivewith a January 1, 2015 effective date and will initially includeincluding actual storm costs compared to collections fromfor December 2013 through November 2014. As a result, of the order, PPL Electric reduced its regulatory liability by $12 million.million in March 2014. Also, as part of the April 2014 order, PPL Electric canwas authorized to recover Hurricane Sandy storm damage costs through the SDER of $29 million over a three-year period beginning January 1, 2015.  See "Storm Costs" below for additional information on Hurricane Sandy costs.


Storm Costs

In February 2013,

On June 20, 2014, the Office of Consumer Advocate (OCA) filed a petition with the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania requesting that the Court reverse and remand the April 2014 order permitting PPL Electric received an order fromto establish the PUC granting permission to defer qualifying costs in excess of insurance recoveries associated with Hurricane Sandy.  At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, $29 million was included onSDER. This matter remains pending before the Balance Sheets as a regulatory asset.


Act 129

Act 129 requires Pennsylvania Electric Distribution Companies (EDCs) to meet specified goals for reduction in customer electricity usage and peak demand by specified dates.  EDCs not meeting the requirements of Act 129 are subject to significant penalties.

Under Act 129, EDCs must file an energy efficiency and conservation plan (EE&C Plan) with the PUC and contract with conservation service providers to implement all or a portion of the EE&C Plan.  EDCs are able to recover the costs (capped at 2.0% of the EDC's 2006 revenue) of implementing their EE&C Plans.  In October 2009, the PUC approved PPL Electric's Phase I EE&C Plan ending May 31, 2013.

Phase I of Act 129 required EDCs to reduce overall electricity consumption by 1.0% by May 2011 and by 3.0% by May 2013, and reduce peak demand by 4.5% by May 2013.  The overall consumption reduction is measured against PUC-forecasted consumption for the twelve months ended May 31, 2010.  The peak demand reduction was required to occur for the 100 hours of highest demand, which is determined by actual demand reduction during the June 2012 through September 2012 period.  The PUC issued an Order on March 20, 2014 determining that PPL Electric met all of its Phase I EE&C compliance requirements.
Under Act 129 the PUC was required to evaluate the costs and benefits of the EE&C program by November 30, 2013 and adopt additional reductions if the benefits of the program exceed the costs.  In August 2012, after receiving input from stakeholders,Commonwealth Court. On January 15, 2015, the PUC issued a Final Implementation Order establishing a three-year Phase II program, ending May 31, 2016, with individual consumption reduction targets for each EDC.final order closing an investigation related to an OCA complaint concerning PPL Electric's Phase II reduction target is 2.1%October 2014 preliminary SDER calculation and modified the effective date of the total energy consumption forecasted by the PUC for the twelve months ended May 31, 2010.  The PUC did not establish demand

45


reduction targets for the Phase II program.  PPL Electric began its PUC-approved Phase II Plan implementation on JuneSDER to February 1, 2013.  In November 2013, PPL Electric filed 40 modifications to its Phase II Plan which contains programs designed to meet PPL Electric's target of reducing total energy consumption by 2.1%.  On March 6, 2014, the PUC issued an order approving the revised EE&C Plan with minor modifications related to training.

Act 129 also requires Default Service Providers (DSP) to provide electricity generation supply service to customers pursuant to a PUC-approved default service procurement plan through auctions, requests for proposal and bilateral contracts at the sole discretion of the DSP.  Act 129 requires a mix of spot market purchases, short-term contracts and long-term contracts (4 to 20 years), with long-term contracts limited to 25% of load unless otherwise approved by the PUC.  A DSP is able to recover the costs associated with its default service procurement plan.

In January 2013, the PUC approved PPL Electric's DSP procurement plan for the period June 1, 2013 through May 31, 2015.  On April 18, 2014, PPL Electric filed a new DSP procurement plan with the PUC for the period June 1, 2015 through May 31, 2017.  This filing is pending before the PUC.

Smart Meter Rider


(SMR)

Act 129 also requires installation of smart meters for new construction, upon the request of consumers and at their cost, or on a depreciation schedule not exceeding 15 years. Under Act 129, EDCs are able to recover the costs of providing smart metering technology. All of PPL Electric's metered customers currently have advanced meters installed at their service locations capable of many of the functions required under Act 129. PPL Electric continues to conductconducted pilot projects to evaluate additional applicationsand technical evaluations of its current advanced metering technology pursuant toand concluded that the current technology does not meet all of the requirements of Act 129. PPL Electric recoversrecovered the cost of its pilot projectsevaluations through a cost recovery mechanism, the Smart Meter Rider (SMR).Rider. In August 2013, PPL Electric filed with the PUC an annual report describing the actions it was taking under its Smart Meter Plan during 2013 and its planned actions for 2014. PPL Electric also submitted revised SMR charges that became effective January 1, 2014. On June 30, 2014, PPL Electric will submitfiled its final Smart Meter Plan with the PUC. In that plan, PPL Electric proposes to replace all of its current meters with advanced meters that meet the Act 129 requirements. Full deployment of the new meters is expected to be complete by Junethe end of 2019. The total cost of the project is estimated to

39

be approximately $450 million. PPL Electric proposes to recover these costs through the SMR which the PUC previously has approved for recovery of such costs. On April 30, 2014.


Distribution System Improvement Charge

Act 11 authorizes2015, the Administrative Law Judge assigned by the PUC to approve two specific ratemaking mechanisms:review PPL Electric's Smart Meter Plan issued a recommended decision approving the use of a fully projected future test year in base rate proceedings and,plan with minor modifications. The recommended decision is subject to certain conditions, the use of a DSIC.  Such alternative ratemaking proceduresfinal approval by and mechanisms provide opportunity for accelerated cost-recovery and, therefore, are important to PPL Electric as it begins a period of significant capital investment to maintain and enhance the reliability of its delivery system, including the replacement of aging distribution assets.  In August 2012, the PUC issued a Final Implementation Order adopting procedures, guidelines and a model tariff for the implementation of Act 11.  Act 11 requires utilities to file an LTIIP as a prerequisite to filing for recovery through the DSIC.  The LTIIP is mandated to be a five- to ten-year plan describing projects eligible for inclusion in the DSIC.

In September 2012, PPL Electric filed its LTIIP describing projects eligible for inclusion in the DSIC and in an order entered on May 23, 2013, the PUC approved PPL Electric's proposed DSIC with an initial rate effective July 1, 2013, subject to refund after hearings.  The PUC also assigned four technical recovery calculation issues to the Office of Administrative Law Judge for hearing and preparation of a recommended decision.  The case remains pending before the PUC.

Federal Matters


FERC Wholesale Formula Rates (PPL and PPL Electric)


Transmission rates are regulated by the FERC.  PPL Electric's transmission revenues are billed in accordance with a FERC-approved PJM open access transmission tariff that utilizes a formula-based rate recovery mechanism.  The formula rate is calculated, in part, based on financial results as reported in PPL Electric's annual FERC Form 1 filed under the FERC's Uniform System of Accounts.

PPL Electric initiated its formula rate 2012, 2011 and 2010 Annual Updates.  Each update was subsequently challenged by a group of municipal customers, whose challenges were opposed by PPL Electric.  Between 2011 and 2013, numerous hearings before the FERC and settlement conferences were convened in an attempt to resolve these matters.  Beginning in the second half of 2013, PPL Electric and the group of municipal customers exchanged confidential settlement proposals.  PPL and PPL Electric cannot predict the outcome of the foregoing proceedings, which remain pending before the FERC.


46


FERC Formula Rates (LKE and KU)

In September 2013, KU filed an application with the FERC to adjust the formula rate under which KU provides wholesale requirements power sales to 12 municipal customers. Among other changes, the application requests an amended formula whereby KU would charge cost-based rates with a subsequent true-up to actual costs, replacing the current formula which does not include a true-up. KU's application proposed an authorized return on equity of 10.7%. Certain elements, including the new formula rate, became effective April 23, 2014, subject to refund. In April 2014, FERC accepted a motion filed by KU requesting a delay until mid-June of the effectiveness of other elements, including updated termination notice periods, new credit and uncollectible charge provisions.  Also in April 2014, nine municipalities submitted notices of termination, under the original notice period provisions, to cease taking power under the wholesale requirements contracts, suchcontracts. Such terminations are to be effective in 2019, except in the case of one municipality with a conditional 2017 effective date. TheIn addition, a tenth municipality which has a previously settled termination date of 2016 has given notice that it will transfer service in June 2015. In July 2014, KU agreed on settlement terms with the two municipal customers that did not provide termination notices and filed the settlement proposal with the FERC for its approval. In August 2014, the FERC issued an order on the interim settlement agreement allowing the proposed rates to become effective pending a final order. If approved, the settlement agreement will resolve the rate case with respect to these two municipalities, including an authorized return on equity of 10% or the return on equity awarded to other parties are continuingin this case, whichever is lower. Also in July 2014, KU made a contractually required filing with the FERC that addressed certain rate recovery matters affecting the nine terminating municipalities during the remaining term of their contracts. KU and the terminating municipalities continue settlement negotiations.discussions in this proceeding. KU cannot currently predict the outcome of its FERC applications regarding its wholesale power agreements with the proceeding or related matters.                    


municipalities.

7. Financing Activities


Credit Arrangements and Short-term Debt


(All Registrants)


The Registrants maintain credit facilities to enhance liquidity, provide credit support and provide a backstop to commercial paper programs. For reporting purposes, on a consolidated basis, the credit facilities and commercial paper programs of PPL Energy Supply, PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU also apply to PPL and the credit facilities and commercial paper programs of LG&E and KU also apply to LKE. The amounts borrowed below are recorded as "Short-term debt" on the Balance Sheets.  TheSheets.The following credit facilities were in place at:

       March 31, 2015 December 31, 2014
                Letters of      Letters of
                Credit       Credit
                and       and
                Commercial       Commercial
       Expiration      Paper Unused   Paper
        Date Capacity Borrowed Issued Capacity Borrowed Issued
PPL                    
U.K.                    
 WPD Ltd.                    
  Syndicated Credit Facility Dec. 2016 £ 210 £ 130    £ 80 £ 103   
 WPD (South West)                    
  Syndicated Credit Facility July 2019   245         245      
 WPD (East Midlands)                    
  Syndicated Credit Facility July 2019   300   147      153   64   
 WPD (West Midlands)                    
  Syndicated Credit Facility July 2019   300         300      
 Uncommitted Credit Facilities     65    £ 5   60    £ 5
   Total U.K. Credit Facilities (a)   £ 1,120 £ 277 £ 5 £ 838 £ 167 £ 5
                           

       March 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
                Letters of      Letters of
                Credit       Credit
                and       and
                Commercial       Commercial
       Expiration      Paper Unused   Paper
        Date Capacity Borrowed Issued Capacity Borrowed Issued
PPL                    
U.K.                    
  PPL WW Syndicated                    
   Credit Facility  Dec. 2016 £ 210  £ 98     £ 112  £ 103    
  WPD (South West)                    
   Syndicated Credit Facility Jan. 2017   245          245       
  WPD (East Midlands)                    
   Syndicated Credit Facility Apr. 2016   300          300       
  WPD (West Midlands)                    
   Syndicated Credit Facility Apr. 2016   300          300       
  Uncommitted Credit Facilities     88     £ 5    83     £ 5 
   Total U.K. Credit Facilities (a)   £ 1,143  £ 98  £ 5  £ 1,040  £ 103  £ 5 
                           
U.S.                    
 PPL Capital Funding                    
  Syndicated Credit Facility (b) Nov. 2018 $ 300  $ 185     $ 115  $ 270    
  Bilateral Credit Facility Mar. 2015   150          150       
   Total PPL Capital Funding Credit Facilities   $ 450  $ 185     $ 265  $ 270    
                           
PPL Energy Supply                    
 Syndicated Credit Facility (b) Nov. 2017 $ 3,000  $ 350  $ 730  $ 1,920     $ 29 
 Letter of Credit Facility Mar. 2015   150       91    59       138 
 Uncommitted Credit Facilities     175       77    98       77 
   Total PPL Energy Supply Credit Facilities   $ 3,325  $ 350  $ 898  $ 2,077     $ 244 
                           
PPL Electric                    
 Syndicated Credit Facility Oct. 2017 $ 300     $ 61  $ 239     $ 21 
                           
LKE                    
 Syndicated Credit Facility (b) Oct. 2018 $ 75  $ 75        $ 75    
                           
LG&E                    
 Syndicated Credit Facility Nov. 2017 $ 500     $ 15  $ 485     $ 20 
                           

47



       March 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
                Letters of      Letters of
                Credit       Credit
                and       and
                Commercial       Commercial
       Expiration      Paper Unused   Paper
        Date Capacity Borrowed Issued Capacity Borrowed Issued
KU                    
 Syndicated Credit Facility Nov. 2017 $ 400     $ 110  $ 290     $ 150 
 Letter of Credit Facility May 2016   198       198          198 
   Total KU Credit Facilities   $ 598     $ 308  $ 290     $ 348 

40

       March 31, 2015 December 31, 2014
                Letters of      Letters of
                Credit       Credit
                and       and
                Commercial       Commercial
       Expiration      Paper Unused   Paper
        Date Capacity Borrowed Issued Capacity Borrowed Issued
U.S.                    
 PPL Capital Funding                    
  Syndicated Credit Facility July 2019 $ 300       $ 300      
  Syndicated Credit Facility Nov. 2018   300         300      
  Bilateral Credit Facility Mar. 2016   150    $ 32   118    $ 21
  Uncommitted Credit Facility       65      1   64      1
   Total PPL Capital Funding Credit Facilities $ 815    $ 33 $ 782    $ 22
                           
 PPL Energy Supply                    
  Syndicated Credit Facility (b) Nov. 2017 $ 3,000 $ 600 $ 267 $ 2,133 $ 630 $ 121
                           
PPL Electric                    
 Syndicated Credit Facility July 2019 $ 300    $ 86 $ 214    $ 1
                           
LKE                    
 Syndicated Credit Facility (b) Oct. 2018 $ 75 $ 75       $ 75   
��                          
LG&E                    
 Syndicated Credit Facility July 2019 $ 500    $ 216 $ 284    $ 264
                           
KU                    
 Syndicated Credit Facility July 2019 $ 400    $ 193 $ 207    $ 236
 Letter of Credit Facility Oct. 2017   198      198         198
   Total KU Credit Facilities   $ 598    $ 391 $ 207    $ 434

(a)PPL WW'sWPD Ltd.'s amounts borrowed at March 31, 20142015 and December 31, 20132014 were USD-denominated borrowings of $164$200 million and $166$161 million, which bore interest at 1.87% and 1.86%. WPD (East Midlands) amounts borrowed at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 were GBP-denominated borrowings which equated to £98$226 million and £103$100 million, at the time of borrowings andwhich bore interest at 1.86% and 1.87%.1.00% for both periods. At March 31, 2014,2015, the unused capacity under the U.K. credit facilities was $1.7$1.3 billion.
(b)At March 31, 2014,2015, PPL Energy Supply's and LKE's interest rates on outstanding borrowings were 1.79% for PPL Capital Funding2.12% and 1.66% for PPL Energy Supply and LKE.1.68%. At December 31, 2013,2014, PPL Energy Supply's and LKE's interest rates on outstanding borrowings were 1.79% for PPL Capital Funding2.05% and 1.67% for LKE..

(PPL)

PPL Energy Supply's Letter of Credit Facility and Uncommitted Credit Facilities that existed at December 31, 2014 have either expired or matured during the first quarter of 2015. Any previously issued letters of credit under these facilities were either terminated or reissued under the PPL Energy Supply Syndicated Credit Facility at March 31, 2015.

(All Registrants)

PPL Electric, LG&E and KU maintain commercial paper programs to provide an additional financing source to fund short-term liquidity needs, as necessary. Commercial paper issuances, included in "Short-term debt" on the Balance Sheets, are supported by the respective Registrant's Syndicated Credit Facility.The following commercial paper programs were in place at:


 March 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
       Weighted -    Commercial   Weighted - Commercial
       Average    Paper Unused Average Paper
       Interest Rate Capacity Issuances Capacity Interest Rate Issuances
                        
 PPL Energy Supply 0.48% $ 750  $ 620  $ 130       
 PPL Electric 0.33%   300    60    240   0.23% $ 20 
 LG&E 0.27%   350    15    335   0.29%   20 
 KU 0.29%   350    110    240   0.32%   150 
   Total   $ 1,750  $ 805  $ 945     $ 190 

(PPL and PPL Energy Supply)

       March 31, 2015 December 31, 2014
       Weighted -    Commercial   Weighted - Commercial
       Average    Paper Unused Average Paper
       Interest Rate Capacity Issuances Capacity Interest Rate Issuances
                        
 PPL Electric 0.57% $ 300 $ 85 $ 215      
 LG&E 0.63%   350   216   134  0.42% $ 264
 KU 0.62%   350   193   157  0.49%   236
   Total   $ 1,000 $ 494 $ 506    $ 500

(PPL)

PPL Energy Supply maintains a $500 million Facility Agreement expiring June 2017, thatwhich provides PPL Energy Supply the ability to request up to $500 million of committed letter of credit capacity at fees to be agreed upon at the time of each request, based on certain market conditions. At March 31, 2014,2015, PPL Energy Supply had not requested any capacity for the issuance of letters of credit under this arrangement.

41

PPL Energy Supply, PPL EnergyPlus, PPL Montour and PPL Brunner Island maintain an $800 million secured energy marketing and trading facility, whereby PPL EnergyPlus will receive credit to be applied to satisfy collateral posting obligations related to its energy marketing and trading activities with counterparties participating in the facility. The credit amount is guaranteed by PPL Energy Supply, PPL Montour and PPL Brunner Island. PPL Montour and PPL Brunner Island have granted liens on their respective generating facilities to secure any amount they may owe under their guarantees. The facility expires in November 2018,2019, but is subject to automatic one-year renewals under certain conditions. There were no$88 million of secured obligations outstanding under this facility at March 31, 2014.


(PPL Electric and LKE)

2015.

(LKE)

See Note 11 for discussion of intercompany borrowings.


(PPL)

Long-term Debt and Equity Securities At-the-Market Stock Offering Program(PPL)


2011 Equity Units

In March 2014,

On February 26, 2015, PPL Capital Funding remarketed $978entered into two separate equity distribution agreements, pursuant to which PPL may sell, from time to time, up to an aggregate of $500 million of 4.32% Junior Subordinated Notes due 2019 that were originally issued in April 2011 as a component of PPL's 2011 Equity Units.  In connection withits common stock. During the remarketing, PPL Capital Funding retired $228 million of the 4.32% Junior Subordinated Notes due 2019 and issued $350 million of 2.189% Junior Subordinated Notes due 2017 and $400 million of 3.184% Junior Subordinated Notes due 2019.  Simultaneously, the newly issued notes were exchanged for $350 million of 3.95% Senior Notes due 2024 and $400 million of 5.00% Senior Notes due 2044.  The transaction was accounted for as a debt extinguishment, resulting in a $(9) million gain (loss) on extinguishment of the Junior Subordinated Notes, recorded to "Interest Expense" on the Statement of Income.  Except for the $228 million


48


retirement of the 4.32% Junior Subordinated Notes and fees related to the transactions, the activity was non-cash and was excluded from the Statement of Cash Flows for the three monthsperiod ended March 31, 2014.  Additionally, on May 1, 2014, PPL issued 31.7 million shares2015, no sales of common stock at $30.86 per share to settleunder the 2011 Purchase Contracts.  PPL received net cash proceeds of $978 million, which will be used to repay short-term debt and for general corporate purposes.

equity distribution agreements were made.

Distributions(PPL)


In February 2014,2015, PPL declared its quarterly common stock dividend, payable April 1, 2014,2015, at 37.25 cents per share (equivalent to $1.49 per annum). Future dividends, declared at the discretion of the Board of Directors, will be dependentdepend upon future earnings, cash flows, financial and legal requirements and other factors.


8. Acquisitions, Development and Divestitures


(All Registrants)


The Registrants from time to time evaluate opportunities for potential acquisitions, divestitures and development projects. Development projects are reexamined based on market conditions and other factors to determine whether to proceed with the projects, sell, cancel or expand them, execute tolling agreements or pursue other options. Any resulting transactions may impact future financial results. See Note 8 in the 20132014 Form 10-K for additional information.


Development

Hydroelectric Expansion Project (

(PPL)

Divestitures

Anticipated Spinoff of PPL Energy Supply

In June 2014,PPL and PPL Energy Supply)


In January 2014,Supply executed definitive agreements with affiliates of Riverstone to combine their competitive power generation businesses into a new, stand-alone, publicly traded company named Talen Energy. Under the U.S. Departmentterms of Treasury awarded $56 million for Specified Energy Property in Lieuthe agreements, at closing, PPL will spin off to PPL shareowners a newly formed entity, Holdco, which at such time will own all of Tax Credits for the Rainbow hydroelectric redevelopment project in Great Falls, Montana.membership interests of PPL Energy Supply accepted and accountedall of the common stock of Talen Energy. Immediately following the spinoff, Holdco will merge with a special purpose subsidiary of Talen Energy, with Holdco continuing as the surviving company to the merger and as a wholly owned subsidiary of Talen Energy and the sole owner of PPL Energy Supply. Substantially contemporaneous with the spinoff and merger, RJS Power will be contributed by its owners to become a subsidiary of Talen Energy. Following completion of these transactions, PPL shareowners will own 65% of Talen Energy and affiliates of Riverstone will own 35%. PPL will have no continuing ownership interest in, control of, or affiliation with Talen Energy. The transaction is intended to be tax-free to PPL and its shareowners for theU.S. federal income tax purposes and is subject to customary closing conditions, including receipt of required regulatory approvals from the grantNRC, FERC, DOJ and PUC, all of which were received by mid-April 2015. In addition, there must be available, subject to certain conditions, at least $1 billion of undrawn credit capacity under a revolving credit or similar facility of Talen Energy or one or more of its subsidiaries. Any letters of credit or other credit support measures posted in connection with energy marketing and trading transactions at the time of the spinoff are excluded from this calculation.

In connection with the FERC approval, PPL and RJS Power agreed thatwithin 12 months after closing of the transaction, Talen Energy will divest approximately 1,300 MW of generating assets in one of two groups of assets (from PPL Energy

42

Supply's existing portfolio, this includes either the Holtwood and Wallenpaupack hydroelectric facilities or the Ironwood facility), and limit PJM energy market offers from assets it would retain in the other group to cost-based offers.

On April 29, 2015, PPL's Board of Directors declared the distribution of Holdco to PPL's shareowners of record on May 20, 2015, with the spinoff to occur on June 1, 2015. Based on the number of shares of PPL common stock outstanding at April 29, 2015, the distribution ratio is expected to be approximately 0.125 shares of Talen common stock for each share of PPL common stock. The final ratio will be determined after the record date. The spinoff will have no effect on the number of PPL common shares owned by PPL shareowners or the number of shares of PPL common stock outstanding.

Following the announcement of the transaction to form Talen Energy, efforts were initiated to identify the appropriate staffing for Talen Energy and for PPL and its subsidiaries following completion of the spinoff.  Organizational plans were substantially completed in 2014. The new organizational plans identified the need to resize and restructure the organizations and as a result, in 2014, estimated charges for employee separation benefits were recorded. See Note 8 in the 2014 Form 10-K for additional information. The separation benefits include cash severance compensation, lump sum COBRA reimbursement payments and outplacement services.  Most separations and payment of separation benefits are expected to be completed by the end of 2015. At March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the recorded liabilities related to the separation benefits were $19 million and $30 million, which are included in "Other current liabilities" on the Balance Sheets.

Additional employee-related costs to be incurred primarily include accelerated stock-based compensation and pro-rated performance-based cash incentive and stock-based compensation awards, primarily for PPL Energy Supply was requiredemployees and for PPL employees who have become PPL Energy Supply employees in connection with the transaction. These costs will be recognized at the spinoff closing date. PPL estimates these additional costs will be in the range of $30 million to recapture$40 million.

PPL recorded $6 million of third-party costs during the three months ended March 31, 2015 related to this transaction. Of these costs, $2 million were primarily for legal and accounting fees to facilitate the transaction, and are recorded in "Other Income (Expense) - net" on the Statement of Income. An additional $4 million of consulting and other costs were incurred to ready the new Talen Energy organization and reconfigure the remaining PPL service functions. These costs are recorded in "Other operation and maintenance" on the Statement of Income. PPL recorded $27 million of third-party costs in 2014 related to this transaction. PPL currently estimates a range of total third-party costs that will ultimately be incurred of between $60 million and $70 million.

The assets and liabilities of investment tax credits previouslyPPL's Supply segment will continue to be classified as "held and used" on PPL's Balance Sheet until the closing of the transaction, at which time the operations of the Supply segment will be classified as discontinued operations. At the close of the transaction, unamortized losses on PPL interest rate swaps recorded relatedin AOCI and designated as hedges of PPL Energy Supply's future interest payments will be reclassified into earnings and reflected in discontinued operations. The amount of these unamortized losses deferred in AOCI at March 31, 2015 was $55 million after-tax.

In conducting its annual goodwill impairment assessment in the fourth quarter of 2014 for its Supply segment reporting unit, PPL determined that the estimated fair value of the Supply segment exceeded its carrying value and no impairment was recognized. PPL had not identified any indicators of impairment as of March 31, 2015, but cannot predict whether an impairment loss will be recorded at the spinoff date. An impairment loss would be recognized by PPL at the spinoff date if the aggregate carrying amount of the Supply segment's assets and liabilities exceed their aggregate fair value at that date and would be reflected in discontinued operations. Upon completion of this transaction, PPL will no longer have a Supply segment.

Discontinued Operations

Montana Hydro Sale

In November 2014, PPL Montana completed the sale to the Rainbow projectNorthWestern of 633 MW of hydroelectric generating facilities located in Montana for approximately $900 million in cash. The proceeds will remain with PPL and not transfer to Talen Energy as a result of the grant receipt.spinoff. The impact onsale included 11 hydroelectric power facilities and related assets, included in the financial statementsSupply segment.

Following are the components of accounting forDiscontinued Operations in the grant receipt and recaptureStatement of investment tax credits was not significantIncome for the three months ended March 31, 31.

43

2014
Operating revenues$ 29
Interest expense (a) 2
Income (loss) before income taxes (b) (10)
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations (net of income taxes) (b) (8)

(a)Represents allocated interest expense based upon the discontinued operations share of the net assets of PPL Energy Supply.
(b)Includes an impairment charge related to the Kerr Dam Project. See Note 13 for additional information.

Development

Future Capacity Needs(PPL, LKE, LG&E and will not be significantKU)

Construction activity is nearing completion and testing is in future periods.


Regional Transmission Line Expansion Plan(PPL and PPL Electric)

Susquehanna-Roseland Project

PPL Electric's construction activities have been underwayprogress on the 101-mile Pennsylvania transmission line project since 2012.  The line is expectedpreviously announced NGCC unit, Cane Run Unit 7, scheduled to be completed beforeoperational in the peak summer demand periodsecond quarter of 2015. AtOn March 31, 2015, LG&E retired an older coal-fired generating unit at the Cane Run plant and anticipates retiring the remaining two coal-fired units at the Cane Run plant in the third quarter of 2015. There were no significant losses related to this retirement.

In October 2013, LG&E and KU announced plans for a 10 MW solar generation facility to be operational in 2016 at a cost of approximately $36 million. In December 2014, PPL Electric's estimate of the project costsa final order was $630 million.  At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, $458 million and $377 million of costs were capitalized and are included on the Balance Sheets primarily in "Construction work in progress."


Other (PPL and PPL Energy Supply)

Montana Hydro Sale Agreement

In September 2013, PPL Montana executed a definitive agreement to sell to NorthWestern its hydroelectric generating facilities located in Montana (with a generation capacity of 633 MW) for $900 million in cash, subject to certain adjustments.  The sale, which is not expected to close before the second half of 2014, includes 11 hydroelectric power facilities and related assets.  In April 2014, the U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission granted early termination of PPL Montana's and NorthWestern's notifications under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976.  The sale remains subject to closing conditions, including receipt of regulatory approvalsissued by the FERC andKPSC approving the Montana Public Service Commission and certain third-party consents.  Duerequest to construct the uncertainties related to certain of these conditions as of March 31, 2014, the sale did not meet the applicable accounting criteria for the assets and liabilities included in the transaction to be classified as held for sale on the balance sheet.

solar generating facility at E.W. Brown.

9. Defined Benefits


(All Registrants except PPL, ElectricLKE and KU)


LG&E)

Certain net periodic defined benefit costs are applied to accounts that are further distributed between capital and expense, including certain costs allocated to applicable subsidiaries for plans sponsored by PPL Services and LKE.Following are the


49


net periodic defined benefit costs (credits) of the plans sponsored by PPL, PPL Energy Supply,and its subsidiaries, LKE and its subsidiaries and LG&E for the periods ended March 31.  The U.K. pension benefits apply to 31:

    Pension Benefits Other Postretirement Benefits
    U.S. U.K.  
    2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014
PPL                  
Service cost $ 32 $ 26 $ 20 $ 18 $ 4 $ 3
Interest cost   59   59   79   88   7   8
Expected return on plan assets   (79)   (74)   (131)   (130)   (7)   (6)
Amortization of:                  
  Prior service cost   2   5            
  Actuarial (gain) loss   25   7   39   33      
Net periodic defined benefit costs (credits) $ 39 $ 23 $ 7 $ 9 $ 4 $ 5
                     
LKE                  
Service cost $ 7 $ 6       $ 1 $ 1
Interest cost   17   17         2   2
Expected return on plan assets   (22)   (20)         (1)   (1)
Amortization of:                  
  Prior service cost   2   1         1   1
  Actuarial (gain) loss   8   3            
Net periodic defined benefit costs (credits) $ 12 $ 7       $ 3 $ 3
                     
LG&E                  
Interest cost $ 3 $ 4            
Expected return on plan assets   (5)   (5)            
Amortization of:                  
  Prior service cost   1   1            
  Actuarial (gain) loss   3   1            
Net periodic defined benefit costs (credits) $ 2 $ 1            

(PPL only.


    Pension Benefits Other Postretirement Benefits
    U.S. U.K.      
                     
    Three Months
    2014  2013  2014  2013  2014  2013 
PPL                  
Service cost $ 26  $ 31  $ 18  $ 18  $ 3  $ 4 
Interest cost   59    54    88    81    8    7 
Expected return on plan assets   (74)   (74)   (130)   (118)   (6)   (6)
Amortization of:                  
  Prior service cost   5    6                     
  Actuarial (gain) loss   7    20    33    38         1 
Net periodic defined benefit costs (credits) $23  $37  $ $19  $ $

PPL Energy Supply                  
Service cost $ 1  $ 2             
Interest cost   2    2             
Expected return on plan assets   (2)   (3)            
Amortization of:                  
  Actuarial (gain) loss        1             
Net periodic defined benefit costs (credits) $ 1  $ 2             
                     
LKE                  
Service cost $ 6  $ 7        $ 1  $ 1 
Interest cost   17    16          2    2 
Expected return on plan assets   (20)   (21)         (1)   (1)
Amortization of:                  
  Prior service cost   1    1          1    1 
  Actuarial (gain) loss   3    8             
Net periodic defined benefit costs (credits) $ 7  $ 11        $ 3  $ 3 
                     
LG&E                  
Service cost      $ 1             
Interest cost  4    3             
Expected return on plan assets   (5)   (5)            
Amortization of:                  
  Prior service cost   1    1             
  Actuarial (gain) loss   1    3             
Net periodic defined benefit costs (credits) $ 1  $ 3             

(All Registrants except PPL)

Electric, LG&E and KU)

In addition to the specific plans they sponsor, PPL Energy Supply subsidiaries are also allocated costs of defined benefit plans sponsored by PPL Services, andit sponsors, LG&E is allocated costs of defined benefit plans sponsored by LKE based on theirits participation in those plans, which management believes are reasonable. PPL Electric and KU do not directly sponsor any defined benefit plans. PPL Electric is allocated costs of defined benefit plans sponsored by PPL Services and KU is allocated

44

costs of defined benefit plans sponsored by LKE based on their participation in those plans, which management believes are reasonable.For the periods ended March 31, PPL Services allocated the following net periodic defined benefit costs to PPL Energy Supply subsidiaries and PPL Electric, and LKE allocated the following net periodic defined benefit costs to LG&E and KU.


    Three Months
      2014  2013 
             
PPL Energy Supply       $ 7  $ 11 
PPL Electric         5    9 
LG&E         2    3 
KU         3    4 

    Three Months
      2015 2014
     ��       
PPL Electric       $ 8 $ 5
             
LG&E         3   2
KU         5   3

10. Commitments and Contingencies


(PPL)

All commitments and contingencies related to PPL Energy Supply and its subsidiaries will remain with PPL Energy Supply and its subsidiaries at the spinoff date without recourse, except as otherwise provided in the definitive agreements entered into in connection with the spinoff of Talen Energy.

Energy Purchase Commitments


(PPL Electric)


See Note 11 for information on the power supply agreements between PPL EnergyPlus and PPL Electric.


50



Legal Matters


(All Registrants)


PPL and its subsidiaries are involved in legal proceedings, claims and litigation in the ordinary course of business. PPL and its subsidiaries cannot predict the outcome of such matters, or whether such matters may result in material liabilities, unless otherwise noted.


WKE Indemnification(PPL and LKE)


See footnote (h)(f) to the table in "Guarantees and Other Assurances" below for information on an LKE indemnity relating to its former WKE lease, including related legal proceedings.


(PPL and PPL Energy Supply)

(PPL)

Sierra Club Litigation


On March 6, 2013, the Sierra Club and the Montana Environmental Information Center (MEIC)MEIC filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court, District of Montana, Billings Division against PPL Montana and the other Colstrip Steam Electric Station (Colstrip) co-owners: Avista Corporation, Puget Sound Energy, Portland General Electric Company, Northwestern EnergyNorthWestern and Pacific Corp.PacifiCorp.  PPL Montana operates Colstrip on behalf of the co-owners.  The suitcomplaint alleges certain violations of the Clean Air Act, including New Source Review, Title V and opacity requirements and listed 39 separate claims for relief.  The complaint requests injunctive relief and civil penalties on average of $36,000 per day per violation, including a request that the owners remediate environmental damage and that $100,000 of the civil penalties be used for beneficial mitigation projects.


On

In July 27, 2013, the Sierra Club and MEIC filed an additional Notice of Intent to Sue, identifying additional plant projects that are alleged not to be in compliance with the Clean Air Act.  OnAct and, in September 27, 2013, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. ThisThe amended complaint dropsdropped all claims regarding pre-2001 plant projects, as well as the plaintiffs' Title V and opacity claims. It does,did, however, add claims with respect to a number of post-2000 plant projects, which effectively increased the number of projects subject to the litigation by about 40. PPL Montana and the other Colstrip Ownersowners filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint in October 2013. In May 2014, the court dismissed the plaintiffs' independent Best Available Control Technology claims and their Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) claims for three projects, but denied the owners' motion to dismiss the plaintiffs' other PSD claims on October 11,statute of limitation grounds. On August 27, 2014, the Sierra Club and MEIC filed a second amended complaint. This complaint includes the same causes of action articulated in the first amended complaint, but alleges those claims in regard to only eight projects at the plant between 2001 and 2013. The courtOn September 26, 2014, the Colstrip owners filed an answer to the second amended complaint. Discovery has not yet ruled on this motion.been completed. In April 2014,2015,

45

the plaintiffs indicated they intend to pursue claims related to only four of the remaining projects. In January 2015, trial as to liability in this matter was re-scheduledrescheduled to JuneNovember 16, 2015. A trial date with respect to remedies, if there is a finding of liability, has not been scheduled. PPL Montana believes it and the other co-owners have numerous defenses to the allegations set forth in this complaint and will vigorously assert the same. PPL Montana cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this matter at this time.


Notice of Intent to File Suit

In October 2014, PPL Energy Supply received a notice letter from the Chesapeake Bay Foundation (CBF) alleging violations of the Clean Water Act and Pennsylvania Clean Streams Law at the Brunner Island generation plant. The letter was sent to PPL Brunner Island and the PADEP and is intended to provide notice of the alleged violations and CBF's intent to file suit in Federal court after expiration of the 60 day statutory notice period.  Among other things, the letter alleges that PPL Brunner Island failed to comply with the terms of its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit and associated regulations related to the application of nutrient credits to the facility's discharges of nitrogen into the Susquehanna River.  The letter also alleges that PADEP has failed to ensure that credits generated from nonpoint source pollution reduction activities that PPL Brunner Island applies to its discharges meet the eligibility and certification requirements under PADEP's nutrient trading program regulations.  If a court-approved settlement cannot be reached, CBF plans to seek injunctive relief, monetary penalties, fees and costs of litigation. PPL cannot predict the outcome of this matter.

Proposed Legislation - Pacific Northwest

In the first quarter of 2015, legislation was proposed in the State of Oregon to eliminate, over time, the sale of electricity in Oregon from coal-fired generating facilities, and in the State of Washington to provide a means of cost recovery to utility owners of coal-fired generating facilities who commit to retire such facilities. Both proposals are in early stages of consideration and PPL cannot predict whether any legislation seeking to achieve the objectives of the Oregon or Washington legislation will be enacted. Were such legislation to be enacted as proposed, such laws, either individually or collectively, would not be expected to have a material adverse effect on PPL's financial condition or results of operation.

(PPL, LKE and LG&E)


Cane Run Environmental Claims


On

In December 16, 2013, six residents, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, filed a class action complaint against LG&E and PPL in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky for allegedalleging violations of the Clean Air Act and RCRA. In addition, these plaintiffs assert common law claims of nuisance, trespass and negligence. These plaintiffs seek injunctive relief and civil penalties, that would accrue to governmental agencies, plus costs and attorney fees, for the alleged statutory violations. Under the common law claims, these plaintiffs seek monetary compensation and punitive damages for property damage and diminished property values for a class consisting of residents within four miles of the plant. In their individual capacities, these plaintiffs seek compensation for alleged adverse health effects. During 2014,In response to a motion to dismiss filed by PPL LKE and LG&E, have filed certain motionsin July 2014, the court dismissed the plaintiffs' RCRA claims and all but one of its Clean Air Act claims, but declined to dismiss thattheir common law tort claims. Upon motion of LG&E and PPL, the district court certified for appellate review the issue of whether the state common law claims are pending beforepreempted by federal statute. In December 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued an order granting appellate review regarding the above matter and such issues as may appropriately be presented by the parties and determined by the court. PPL, LKE and LG&E cannot predict the outcome of this matter or the potential impact on operations of the Cane Run plant. LG&E has previously announced that itretired one coal-fired unit at the Cane Run plant in March 2015 and anticipates retiring the remaining two coal-fired units at the Cane Run beforeplant in the endthird quarter of 2015.


Mill Creek Environmental Claims


In MarchMay 2014, LG&E received a notice of intent from the Sierra Club informing various federal and state agencies of its intent to filefiled a citizen suit against LG&E in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky for alleged violations of the Clean Water Act. The claimants allegeSierra Club alleges that various discharges at the Mill Creek plant constitute permit violations and state that it will seekof the plant's water discharge permit. The Sierra Club seeks civil penalties, injunctive relief, plus costs and attorney's fees. The parties have filed various cross-motions for summary judgment which are pending before the court. PPL, LKE and LG&E cannot predict the outcome of this matter or the potential impact on the operations of the Mill Creek plant.


51


plant but believe the plant is operating in compliance with the permits.

Regulatory Issues


(All Registrants except PPL Energy Supply)


Registrants)

See Note 6 for information on regulatory matters related to utility rate regulation.

46

(PPL PPL Energy Supply and PPL Electric)


New Jersey Capacity Legislation


In January 2011, New Jersey enacted a law (the Act) that intervenesPPL believes would intervene in the wholesale capacity market exclusively regulated by the FERC (the Act).  Toto create incentives for the development of new, in-state electricity generation facilities the Act implements a long-term capacity agreement pilot program (LCAPP).  The Act requires New Jersey utilities to pay a guaranteed fixed price for wholesale capacity, imposed by the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (BPU), to certain new generators participating in PJM, with the ultimate costs of that guarantee to be borne by New Jersey ratepayers.  PPL believes the intent and effect of the LCAPP is to encourage the construction of new generation in New Jersey even when, under the FERC-approved PJM economic model, such new generation would not be economic. The Act could depress capacity prices in PJM in the short term,short-term, impacting PPL Energy Supply's revenues, and harm the long-term ability of the PJM capacity market to encourage necessary generation investment throughout PJM.


In February 2011, PPL and several other generating companies and utilities filed a complaint in U.S. District Court in New Jersey challenging the Act on the grounds that it violates well-established principles under the Supremacy and Commerce clauses of the U.S. Constitution and requesting declaratory and injunctive relief barring implementation of the Act by the BPU Commissioners.implementation. In October 2013, the U.S. District Court in New Jersey issued a decision finding the Act unconstitutional under the Supremacy Clause on the grounds that it infringes upon the FERC's exclusive authority to regulate the wholesale sale of electricity in interstate commerce. The decision has beenwas appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (Third Circuit) by CPV Power Development, Inc., Hess Newark, LLC and the State of New Jersey and oral argument was held on(the Appellants). In September 2014, the Third Circuit affirmed the District Court's decision. In December 2014, the Appellants filed a petition for certioraribefore the U.S. Supreme Court. In March 27, 2014.  PPL, PPL Energy Supply and PPL Electric cannot predict2015, the outcome ofU.S. Supreme Court requested the U.S. Solicitor General to submit briefs expressing its views as to the issues raised in this proceeding or the economic impact on their businesses or operations, or the markets in which they transact business.


case.

Maryland Capacity Order


In April 2012, the Maryland Public Service Commission (MD PSC) ordered (Order) three electric utilities in Maryland to enter into long-term contracts to support the construction of new electricity generating facilities in Maryland specifically a 661 MW natural gas-fired combined-cycle generating facility to be owned by CPV Maryland, LLC.  PPL believes the intent and effect of the action by the MD PSC iswhich, PPL believed, was to encourage the construction of new generation in Maryland even when, under the FERC-approved PJM economic model, such new generation would not be economic. The MD PSC action could depress capacity prices in PJM in the short term,short-term, impacting PPL Energy Supply's revenues, and harm the long-term ability of the PJM capacity market to encourage necessary generation investment throughout PJM.


In April 2012, PPL and several other generating companies filed a complaint in U.S. District Court (District Court) in Maryland challenging the MD PSC orderOrder on the grounds that it violates well-established principles under the Supremacy and Commerce clauses of the U.S. Constitution and requested declaratory and injunctive relief barring implementation of the order by the MD PSC Commissioners. In September 2013, the U.S. District Court in Maryland issued a decision finding the MD PSC orderOrder unconstitutional under the Supremacy Clause on the grounds that it infringes upon the FERC's exclusive authority to regulate the wholesale sale of electricity in interstate commerce. The decision has beenwas appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (Fourth Circuit) by CPV Power Development, Inc. and the State of Maryland. Oral argument has been scheduledMaryland (the Appellants). In June 2014, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the District Court's opinion and subsequently denied the Appellants' motion for May 13, 2014.  PPL, PPL Energy Supply, and PPL Electric cannot predictrehearing. In December 2014, the outcome ofAppellants filed a petition for certiorari before the U.S. Supreme Court. In March 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court requested the U.S. Solicitor General to submit briefs expressing its views as to the issues raised in this proceeding or the economic impact on their businesses or operations, or the markets in which they transact business.


case.

Pacific Northwest Markets(PPL)(PPL and PPL Energy Supply)


Through its subsidiaries, PPL Energy Supply made spot market bilateral sales of power in the Pacific Northwest during the period from December 2000 through June 2001. Several parties subsequently claimed refunds at FERC as a result of these sales. In June 2003, the FERC terminated proceedings to consider whether to order refunds for spot market bilateral sales made in the Pacific Northwest, including sales made by PPL Montana, during the period December 2000 through June 2001. In August 2007, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed the FERC's decision and ordered the FERC to consider additional evidence. In October 2011, FERC initiated proceedings to consider additional evidence. In July 2012, PPL Montana and the City of Tacoma, one of the two parties claiming refunds at FERC, reached a settlement whereby PPL Montana paid $75 thousand to resolve the City of Tacoma's $23 million claim. The settlement does not resolve the


52


remaining claim outstanding at March 31, 2014 by the City of Seattle for approximately $50 million. Hearings before a FERC Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) regarding the City of Seattle's refund claims were completed in October 2013 and briefing was completed in January 2014. OnIn March 28, 2014, the Administrative Law JudgeALJ issued an extensive opinioninitial decision denying the City of Seattle's complaint against PPL Montana. The Administrative Law Judge's opinioninitial decision is pending review by the FERC. In June 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit will be reviewed by FERC.

hold oral argument on an appeal from the FERC's October 2011 order setting out the remand process that FERC has followed from 2011 to the present.

Although PPL and its subsidiaries believe they have not engaged in any improper trading or marketing practices affecting the Pacific Northwest markets, PPL and PPL Energy Supply cannot predict the outcome of the above-described proceedings or whether any subsidiaries

47

will be the subject of any additional governmental investigations or named in other lawsuits or refund proceedings. Consequently, PPL and PPL Energy Supply cannot estimate a range of reasonably possible losses, if any, related to this matter.


(All Registrants)


FERC Market-Based Rate Authority

In 1998, the FERC authorized LG&E, KU and PPL EnergyPlus to make wholesale sales of electricity and related products at market-based rates.  In those orders, the FERC directed LG&E, KU and PPL EnergyPlus, respectively, to file an updated market analysis within three years after the order, and every three years thereafter.  Since then, periodic market-based rate filings with the FERC have been made by LG&E, KU, PPL EnergyPlus, PPL Electric, PPL Montana and most of PPL Generation's subsidiaries.  In December 2013, PPL and these subsidiaries filed market-based rate updates for the Eastern and Western regions.  PPL cannot predict the ultimate outcome of these update filings at this time.

Electricity - Reliability Standards


The NERC is responsible for establishing and enforcing mandatory reliability standards (Reliability Standards) regarding the bulk power system. The FERC oversees this process and independently enforces the Reliability Standards.


The Reliability Standards have the force and effect of law and apply to certain users of the bulk power electricity system, including electric utility companies, generators and marketers. Under the Federal Power Act, the FERC may assess civil penalties of up to $1 million per day, per violation, for certain violations.


PPL, LG&E, KU, and PPL Electric and certain subsidiaries of PPL Energy Supply monitor their compliance with the Reliability Standards and continue to self-report potential violations of certain applicable reliability requirements and submit accompanying mitigation plans, as required. The resolution of a number of potential violations is pending. Any Regional Reliability Entity (including RFC or SERC) determination concerning the resolution of violations of the Reliability Standards remains subject to the approval of the NERC and the FERC.


In the course of implementing their programs to ensure compliance with the Reliability Standards by those PPL affiliates subject to the standards, certain other instances of potential non-compliance may be identified from time to time. The Registrants cannot predict the outcome of these matters, and cannot estimate a range of reasonably possible losses, if any.


As previously reported, in

In October 2012, the FERC initiated its consideration of proposed changes to Reliability Standards to address the impacts of Geomagnetic Disturbancesgeomagnetic disturbances on the reliable operation of the bulk-power system, which might, among other things, lead to a requirement to install equipment that blocks geomagnetically induced currents on implicated transformers. OnIn May 16, 2013, FERC issued Order No. 779, requiring NERC to submit two types of Reliability Standards for FERC's approval. The first type would require certain owners and operators of the nation's electricity infrastructure, such as the Registrants, to develop and implement operational procedures to mitigate the effects of Geomagnetic Disturbancesgeomagnetic disturbances on the bulk-power system. This NERC proposed standard was filed by NERC with FERC for approval in January 2014, with a comment due date of March 24,and was approved in June 2014. The second type is to require owners and operators of the bulk-power system to assess certain Geomagnetic Disturbancegeomagnetic disturbance events and develop and implement plans to protect the bulk-power system from those events and must beevents. This proposal was filed by NERC with FERC for approval by January 22, 2015.2015 and is pending consideration by FERC. The Registrants may be required to make significant expenditures in new equipment or modifications to their facilities to comply with the new requirements. The Registrants are unable to predict the amount of any expenditures that may be required as a result of the adoption of any Reliability Standards for Geomagnetic Disturbances.



53


geomagnetic disturbances.

Environmental Matters - Domestic


(All Registrants)


Due to the environmental issues discussed below or other environmental matters, it may be necessary for the Registrants to modify, curtail, replace or cease operation of certain facilities or performance of certain operations to comply with statutes, regulations and other requirements of regulatory bodies or courts. In addition, legal challenges to new environmental permits or rules add to the uncertainty of estimating the future cost impact of these permits and rules.


LG&E and KU are entitled to recover, through the ECR mechanism, certain costs of complying with the Clean Air Act, as amended, and those federal, state or local environmental requirements which are applicable to coal combustion wastes and by-products from facilities that generate electricity from coal in accordance with approved compliance plans. Costs not covered by the ECR mechanism for LG&E and KU and all such costs for PPL Electric are subject to rate recovery before the companies' respective state regulatory authorities, or the FERC, if applicable. Because PPL Electric does not own any generating plants, its exposure to related environmental compliance costs is reduced. As PPL Energy Supply is not a rate-regulated entity, it cannot seek to recover environmental compliance costs through the mechanism of rate recovery. PPL, PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU can provide no assurances as to the ultimate outcome of future environmental or rate proceedings before regulatory authorities.

48

(All Registrants except PPL Electric)


Air


CSAPR

The EPA's CSAPR (formerly Clean Air Transport Rule)addresses the interstate transport of fine particulates and CAIR


ozone by regulating emissions of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide. In July 2011, the EPA adopted the CSAPR.  The CSAPR replaced the EPA's previous CAIR which was invalidated in July 2008 by theaccordance with an October 2014 U.S. Court of Appeals decision, CSAPR establishes interstate allowance trading programs for sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions from fossil-fueled plants in two phases: Phase 1 commenced in January 2015 and Phase 2 commences in 2017. Sulfur dioxide emissions are subject to an annual trading program and nitrogen oxide emissions are subject to annual and ozone season programs. Oral arguments pertaining to outstanding challenges to the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit Court).  CAIR subsequently was effectively reinstated byEPA's CSAPR were heard before the D.C. Circuit Court in December 2008, pending finalization of the CSAPR.  Like CAIR, CSAPR targeted sources in the eastern U.S. and would have required reductions in sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides in two phases (2012 and 2014).

In December 2011, the D.C. Circuit Court stayed implementation of the CSAPR and left CAIR in effect pending a final decision on the validity of the rule.  In August 2012, the D.C. Circuit Court issued a ruling invalidating CSAPR, remanding the rule to the EPA for further action, and leaving CAIR in place during the interim.  In June 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court granted the EPA's petition for review of the D.C. Circuit Court's August 2012 decision.  On April 29, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed and remanded the D.C. Circuit Court's August 2012 decision which may result in new or revised emission reduction requirements, including the possible replacement of the CAIR program with CSAPR, depending on future determinations by the EPA and the courts.February 2015.

Although PPL, PPL Energy Supply, LKE, LG&E and KU cannot currently predict the outcome of further regulatory and legal proceedings.

The Kentucky fossil-fueled generating plants meet the CAIR sulfur dioxide emission requirements by utilizing sulfur dioxide allowances (including banked allowances and optimizing existing controls).  To meet the CAIR standards for nitrogen oxide under the CAIR, the Kentucky companies will need to buy allowances and/or make operational changes. LG&E and KU do not currently anticipate significant costs to comply with these programs, changes in market or operating conditions could result in impacts that the costs of meeting these reinstated CAIR standards will be significant.

PPL Energy Supply's Pennsylvania fossil-fueled generating plants meet the CAIR sulfur dioxide emission requirements with the existing scrubbers that were placed in service in 2008 and 2009.  To meet the CAIR standards for nitrogen oxides, PPL Energy Supply will need to buy allowances and/or make operational changes, the costs of which are not anticipated to be significant.

higher than anticipated.

National Ambient Air Quality Standards


In 2008, the EPA revised the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for ozone. As a result, of EPA's new ozone standard, states in the ozone transport region (OTR), including Pennsylvania, are required by the Clean Air Act to impose additional reductions in nitrogen oxide emissions based upon reasonably available control technologies.technologies (RACT). The PADEP has issuedis expected to finalize a draftRACT rule in 2015 requiring reasonable reductions. However, the proposal is being challenged as too lenient by other OTR states and environmental groups. The PADEP may imposesome fossil-fueled plants to operate at more stringent nitrogen oxide emission limits than those set forthrates. The EPA proposed to further strengthen the ozone standard in the proposed ruleNovember 2014, which could have a significant impact on PPL Energy Supply's Pennsylvania coal plants.


lead to further nitrogen oxide reductions, for PPL's fossil-fueled plants within the OTR. The EPA is under court order to finalize the standard by October 1, 2015. States are also obligated to address interstate transport issues associated with new ozone standards through the establishment of "good neighbor" state implementation plans for those states that are found to contribute significantly to another states' non-attainment. In December 2012,January 2015, the EPA issued final rules that strengthena policy memo to state agencies to facilitate the fine particulate standards.  Underdevelopment of these plans for the final rules,2008 standard, including modeling data defining state contributions. The implementation of such plans could have an impact on the structure and stringency of CSAPR Phase 2 reductions (discussed above), or it could lead to the development of a new ozone transport rule. Non-OTR states, including Kentucky, are working together to evaluate further nitrogen oxide reductions from fossil-fueled plants with SCRs. The nature and the EPA have until 2015 to identify non-attainment areas, and states have until 2020 to achieve attainment for those areas.

54



timing of any additional reductions resulting from these evaluations cannot be determined at this time.

In 2010, the EPA finalized a new one-hour standardNational Ambient Air Quality Standard for sulfur dioxide and required states to identify areas that meet those standards and areas that are in non-attainment."non-attainment". In July 2013, the EPA finalized non-attainment designations for parts of the country, including part of Yellowstone County in Montana (Billings area) and part of Jefferson County in Kentucky. Attainment must be achieved by 2018. StatesPursuant to a consent decree between the EPA and Sierra Club approved on March 2, 2015, states are working onto finalize designations for other areas.areas by the 2017 or 2020 deadline depending on which designation methodology is used. PPL, PPL Energy Supply, LKE, LG&E and KU anticipate that some of the measures required for compliance with the CAIR,CSAPR (as discussed above), or the MATS, or the Regional Haze requirementsRules (as discussed below), such as upgraded or new sulfur dioxide scrubbers at certain plants and, in the case of LG&E and KU, the previously announced retirement of coal-fired generating units at the Cane Run, Green River and Tyrone plants, will help to achieve compliance with the new one-hour sulfur dioxide standard. If additional reductions were to be required, the financial impact could be significant. The short-term impact on the Corette plant from the EPA's final designation of part of Yellowstone County in Montana as non-attainment (as noted above) is not expected to be significant, as the operations were suspended and the plant was retired in March 2015. In addition, MDEQ recently submitted a request to the EPA for a determination that this area is in attainment. If the EPA agrees with this request, then the deadlines associated with non-attainment would be suspended.

In December 2012, the EPA issued final rules that tighten the annual National Ambient Air Quality Standard for fine particulates. The rules were challenged by industry groups, and in May 2014 the D.C. Circuit Court upheld them. On January 15, 2015, the EPA published a final rule establishing area designations under the standard. Non-attainment areas in Pennsylvania and Kentucky were identified; however, EPA recently approved state implementation plan revisions for both states that improved these classifications. PPL Energy Supply, previously announced its intentLG&E and KU plants in Pennsylvania and Kentucky will not be expected to place the plant in long-term reserve status beginning in April 2015.


make further reductions towards achieving attainment.

Until final rules are promulgated, non-attainment designations are finalized and consequentstate compliance plans for sulfur dioxide and particulate matter are developed, by the EPA and state or local agencies, PPL, PPL Energy Supply, LKE, LG&E and KU cannot predict the impactultimate outcome of the new standards.National Ambient Air Quality standards for ozone, sulfur dioxide and particulate matter.

49

MATS


In May 2011,February 2012, the EPA published a proposed regulationfinalized the MATS rule requiring stringent reductions of mercury and other hazardous air pollutants from fossil-fuel fired power plants.  In February 2012, the EPA published the final rule,plants, known as the MATS, with an effective date of April 16, 2012. The rule which was challenged by industry groups and states and was upheld by the D.C. Circuit Court in April 2014. A group of states subsequently petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to review this decision and on March 25, 2015, oral arguments were heard as to one issue - whether or not EPA unreasonably refused to consider costs when determining whether the MATS regulation was appropriate and necessary. A U.S. Supreme Court decision is expected by June 30, 2015. The rule provides for a three-year compliance deadline with the potential for a one-year extensionone- and two-year extensions as provided under the statute. PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU and PPL Energy Supplyhave completed installation or upgrading of relevant environmental controls at affected plants or have received compliance extensions, for certain plants and are considering extension requests for other plants as well.


applicable.

At the time the MATS rule was proposed, LG&E and KU filed requests with the KPSC for environmental cost recovery based on their expected need to install environmental controls including chemical additive and fabric-filter baghouses to remove air pollutants. Recovery of the cost of certain controls was granted by the KPSC in December 2011. LG&E's March 2015 retirement of one coal-fired generating unit at Cane Run and LG&E's and KU's anticipated retirement of certainremaining coal-fired electricity generating units located at Cane Run and Green River isin 2015 and 2016 are in response to MATS and other environmental regulations. The retirement of these units is not expected to have a material impact on the financial condition or results of operations of PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU are continuing to assess whether any revisions of their approved compliance plans will be necessary.


With respect to or KU.

PPL Energy Supply's Pennsylvania plants, PPL Energy Supply believes that installation of chemical additive systems and other controls may be necessary at certain coal-fired plants in Pennsylvania, the capital cost of which is not expected to be significant. PPL Energy Supply continues to analyze the potential impact of MATS on operating costs. With respect to PPL Energy Supply'sPPL's Montana plants, modifications to the air pollution controls installed onat Colstrip may beare required, the cost of which is not expected to be significant. ForOperations were suspended and the Corette plant PPL Energy Supply announcedwas retired in September 2012 its intention, beginning in AprilMarch 2015 to place the plant in long-term reserve status, suspending the plant's operation due to expected market conditions and the costs to comply with the MATS requirements.  The Corette plant was determined to be impaired in December 2013.  See Note 18 in PPL's and

PPL, Energy Supply's 2013 Form 10-K for additional information.


PPL Energy Supply,LKE, LG&E and KU are continuing to conductconducting in-depth reviews of the MATS, includingEPA's amendments to the potential implicationsfinal rule and certain proposed corrections, none of which are currently expected to scrubber wastewater discharges.  See the discussion of effluent limitations guidelines and standards below.

be significant.

Regional Haze and Visibility


The EPA's regional haze programs were developed under the Clean Air Act to eliminate man-made visibility degradation by 2064. Under the programs, states are required to make reasonable progress every decade through the application, among other things, of Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) on power plants commissioned between 1962 and 1977.


The primary power plant emissions affecting visibility are sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and particulates. To date, the focus of regional haze activityregulation has been the western U.S. becauseAs for the eastern U.S., the EPA had determined that region-wide reductions under the regionalCSAPR trading program could, in the eastern U.S.most instances, be utilized under CSAPR satisfiesstate programs to satisfy BART requirements to reducefor sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides. AlthoughHowever, the D.C. Circuit Court's August 2012 decision to vacateEPA's determination is being challenged by environmental groups and remand CSAPR has been reversed by the U.S. Supreme Court, future decisions by EPA and the courts will determine whether power plants located in the eastern U.S., including PPL's plants in Pennsylvania and Kentucky, will be subject to additional reductions in sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides as required by BART.  In addition, others.

LG&E's Mill Creek Units 3 and 4 are required to reduce sulfuric acid mist emissions because they were determined to have a significant regional haze impact. These reductions are required in the regional haze state

55


implementation plan that the Kentucky Division for Air Quality submitted to the EPA. LG&E is currently installing sorbent injection technology to comply with these reductions, the costs of which are not expected to be significant.

In Montana, the EPA Region 8 developed the regional haze plan as the MDEQ declined to develop a BART state implementation plan.do so. The EPA finalized the Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) for Montana in September 2012. The final FIP assumed no additional controls for Corette or Colstrip Units 3 and 4, but proposed tighterstricter limits for Corette and Colstrip Units 1 and 2. PPL Energy Supply expects to meetwas meeting these tighterstricter permit limits at Corette without any significant changes to operations, although other requirements have led to the planned suspension of operations atand the retirement of Corette beginning in AprilMarch 2015 (see "MATS" discussion above). Under the final FIP, Colstrip Units 1 and 2 may require additional controls, including the possible installation of an SNCR and other technology, to meet more stringent nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide limits. The cost of these potential additional controls, if required, could be significant. Both PPL and environmental groups have appealed the final FIP to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.


Circuit, oral argument was heard in May 2014, and the parties are awaiting a decision.

New Source Review (NSR)


The EPA has continued its NSR enforcement efforts targeting coal-fired generating plants. The EPA has asserted that modification of these plants has increased their emissions and, consequently, that they are subject to stringent NSR requirements under the Clean Air Act. In April 2009, PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU received various EPA information requests for its Montourin 2007 and Brunner Island plants, and PPL and

50

2009, but have received no further communications from the EPA have exchanged certain information regarding this matter.related to those requests since providing their responses. In January 2009, PPL PPL Energy Supply and other companies that own or operate the Keystone plant in Pennsylvania received a notice of violation from the EPA alleging that certain projects were undertaken without proper NSR compliance. The companies responded to the EPA and the matter remains open. In May and November 2012, PPL Montana received information requests from the EPA regarding projects undertaken during a Spring 2012 maintenance outage at Colstrip Unit 1. The EPA requests remain an open matter. In September 2012, PPL Montana received an information request from the MDEQ regarding Colstrip Unit 1 and other projects. These matters remain open.  PPL and PPL Energy Supply cannot predict the outcomeMDEQ formally suspended this request on June 6, 2014 in consideration of these matters, and cannot estimate a range of reasonably possible losses, if any.


In August 2007, LG&E received information requests for the Mill Creek and Trimble County plants, and KU received requests for the Ghent plant, but they have received no further communications from the EPA since providing their responses.pending litigation (see "Legal Matters - Sierra Club Litigation" above). PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU cannot predict the outcome of these matters, and cannot estimate a range of reasonably possible losses, if any.

States and environmental groups also have commenced litigation alleging violations of the NSR regulations by coal-fired generating plants across the nation. See "Legal Matters" above for information on a lawsuit filed by environmental groups in March 2013 against PPL Montana and other owners of Colstrip.


If any PPL subsidiaries aresubsidiary is found to have violated NSR regulations by significantly increasing pollutants through a major plant modification, PPL, PPL Energy Supply, LKE, LG&E and KUthe subsidiary would, among other things, be required to meet stringent permit limits reflecting Best Available Control Technology (BACT) for pollutants meeting the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) in the area and reflecting Lowest Achievable Emission Rates for pollutants not meeting the NAAQS in the area. The costs to meet such limits, including installation of technology at certain units, could be significant.


TC2material.

Trimble County Unit 2 Air Permit(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)


The Sierra Club and other environmental groups petitioned the Kentucky Environmental and Public Protection Cabinet to overturn the air permit issued for the TC2Trimble County Unit 2 baseload coal-fired generating unit, but the agency upheld the permit in an order issued in September 2007. In response to subsequent petitions by environmental groups, the EPA ordered certain non-material changes to the permit which, in January 2010, were incorporated into a final revised permit issued by the Kentucky DepartmentDivision for Air Quality. In March 2010, the environmental groups petitioned the EPA to object to the revised state permit. Until the EPA issues a final ruling on the pending petition and all available appeals are exhausted, PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU cannot predict the outcome of this matter or the potential impact on plant operations, including increased capital costs, if any.


Climate Change

(All Registrants)


Climate Change

As a result of the April 2007 U.S. Supreme Court decision that the EPA has authority under the Clean Air Act to regulate GHGcarbon dioxide emissions from new motor vehicles, in April 2010 the EPA and the U.S. Department of Transportation issued new light-duty vehicle emissions standards that applied beginning with 2012 model year vehicles. The EPA also clarified that this standard, beginning in 2011, authorized regulation of GHGcarbon dioxide emissions from stationary sources under the NSR and Title V


56


operating permit provisions of the Clean Air Act. The EPA's rules were challenged in court and on June 23, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the EPA has the authority to regulate carbon dioxide emissions under these provisions of the Clean Air Act but only for stationary sources that would otherwise have been subject to these provisions due to significant increases in emissions of other pollutants. As a result, any new sources or major modifications to an existing GHG sourcessource causing a net significant increase in carbon dioxide emissions increase now require adherence to themust comply with BACT permit limits for GHGs.  The rules were challenged and,carbon dioxide if it would otherwise be subject to BACT or lowest achievable emissions ratelimits due to significant increases in June 2012, the D.C. Circuit Court upheld the EPA's regulations.  In December 2012, the D.C. Circuit Court denied petitions for rehearing pertaining to its June 2012 opinion.  On October 15, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari for several petitions to decide whether the NSR provisions of the Clean Air Act require the EPA to regulate GHG emissions from stationary sources, such as power plants.  The oral argument was held on February 24, 2014, and the decision is pending.

other pollutants.

In June 2013, President Obama released his Climate Action Plan that reiterates the goal of reducing greenhouse gasGHG emissions in the U.S. "in the range of" 17% below 2005 levels by 2020 through such actions as regulating power plant emissions, promoting increased use of renewables and clean energy technology, and establishing tightermore restrictive energy efficiency standards.  Also, by Presidential Memorandum, the EPA was directed to issue a revised proposal for new power plants (a prior proposal was issued in 2012) by September 20, 2013, with a final rule in a timely fashion thereafter, and to issue proposed standards for existing plants by June 1, 2014 with a final rule to be issued by June 1, 2015.  The EPA was further directed to require that states develop implementation plans for existing plants by June 2016.  Regulation of GHG emissions from existing plants could have a significant industry-wide impact depending on the structure and stringency of the final rule and the state implementation plans.  The Administration's increase in its estimate of the "social cost of carbon" (which is used to calculate benefits associated with proposed regulations) from $23.80 to $38 per metric ton in 2015 may also lead to more costly regulatory requirements; the White House Office of Management and Budget has opened this issue for public comment. Additionally, the Climate Action Plan requirements relatedcalls for the U.S. to preparing the U.S.prepare for the impacts of climate changechange. Requirements related to this Plan could affect PPLthe Registrants and others in the industry as modifications may be needed to electricity delivery systems to improve the ability to withstand major storms may be needed in order to meet those requirements.


As further described below, the EPA has proposed rules pursuant to this directive, which it expects to finalize in the second or third quarter of 2015. The EPA has also announced that it will develop a federal implementation plan which would apply to any states that fail to submit an acceptable state implementation plan. The EPA's authority to promulgate these regulations under Section 111 of the Clean Air Act when the sources are already regulated under Section 112 is under challenge in the D.C. Circuit Court. Oral arguments were heard on April 16, 2015.

In January 2014, the EPA issued itsa revised proposal forto regulate carbon dioxide emissions from new sources on September 20, 2013 as directed by the White House.  This proposal was published in the Federal Register on January 8, 2014.power plants. The comment period on the proposal closes on May 9, 2014.  Unlike the EPA's prior proposal, the EPA's revised proposal establishedcalls for separate emission standards for coal and gas units based on the application of different

51

technologies. The coal standard is based on the application of partial carbon capture and sequestration technology, but because this technology is not presently commercially available, the revised proposal effectively precludes the construction of new coalcoal-fired plants. The standard for NGCC power plants is the same as the EPA proposed in 2012 and is not continuously achievable.


At The preclusion of new coal-fired plants and the regional level, ten northeastern statescompliance difficulties posed for new gas-fired plants could have been participating in a cap-and-trade program calledsignificant industry-wide impact.

In June 2014, the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI).  The program commenced in January 2009 and covers electric power plants greater than 25 MW.  The program calls for a 10% reduction inEPA issued proposed regulations addressing carbon dioxide emissions from these plantsexisting power plants. The existing plant proposal contains state-specific rate-based reduction goals and guidelines for the development, submission and implementation of state plans to achieve the state goals. State-specific goals were calculated from 2012 data by 2019 comparedapplying EPA's broad interpretation and definition of the Best System of Emission Reduction resulting in stringent targets to 2005 levels.  Pennsylvania has not stated an intention to join the RGGI, but enacted the Pennsylvania Climate Change Act of 2008 (PCCA)be met in two phases (2020-2029 and 2030 and beyond). The PCCA establishedEPA believes it has offered some flexibility to the states as to how state compliance plans can be crafted, including the option to demonstrate compliance on a Climate Change Advisory Committee to advise the PADEPmass basis and through multi-state collaborations. The EPA is also proposing potential state plan extensions based on the developmenttype of a Climate Change Action Plan.  In December 2013,plan filed (single or multi state). PPL has analyzed the Advisory Committee issued an updated Climate Change Action Reportproposal and identified specific actions that could resultpotential impacts and solutions in reducing GHG emissionscomments filed on December 1, 2014. PPL also submitted Supplemental Comments to FERC through EEI, advocating for reliability coordination and relief in response to technical conferences hosted by 30% by 2020.FERC on the reliability implications of implementing this rule. The report recognized some legislative initiatives that were enacted since 2009 that facilitated reductions in GHG emissions and made a number of legislative recommendations that include amending the PA AEPS Act to include additional waste-to-energy facilities, providing incentives for coal mine methane usage, providing incentives for alternative fuel vehicles and addressing the long-term viability issues of carbon capture and sequestration.


The PADEP submitted to the EPA a GHG white paper on April 10, 2014 regarding the regulation of carbon dioxide emissions under Section 111(d)from existing power plants could have a significant industry-wide impact depending on the structure and stringency of the Clean Air Act.final rule and state implementation plans.

In June 2014, the EPA also proposed a regulation addressing carbon dioxide emissions from existing power plants that are modified or reconstructed. The Registrants, however, do not expect a significant impact from this rulemaking as there are no plans to modify or reconstruct their existing plants in a manner that would trigger the proposed requirements.

(PPL)

Based on the stringent GHG reduction requirements in the EPA's proposed rule for existing plants, and based on information gained from public input, the PADEP expectsis no longer expecting to achieve all required GHG reductions required under the EPA's expected rules by solely increasing efficiency at existing fossil-fuel plants and/or reducing generation.  The PADEP specifically excludes energy efficiency projects not associated with existing sources (suchtheir generation as DSM and Act 129 programs) from consideration for crediting towardset forth in the program.  The PADEP also suggests an exemption for burning waste coal and coal bed methane.


PADEP's April 10, 2014 white paper. In November 2008,October 2014, the Governor of KentuckyPennsylvania signed into law Act 175 of 2014, requiring the PADEP to obtain General Assembly approval of any state plan addressing GHG emissions under the EPA's GHG rules for existing plants. The law includes provisions to minimize the exposure to a federal implementation plan due to legislative delay.

The MDEQ, at the request of the Governor of Montana, has issued a comprehensive energy planwhite paper outlining possible regulatory scenarios to implement the EPA's proposed GHG rule for existing plants, including non-binding targets aimed at promoting improveda combination of increasing energy efficiency developmentat coal-fired plants, adding more low- and zero-carbon generation, and carbon sequestration at Colstrip. The white paper was made public in September 2014 and the MDEQ has held public meetings to present the white paper and gather comments. Legislation drafted to require legislative approval of alternative energy, development of carbon captureany related plan formulated by MDEQ was tabled.

(PPL, LKE, LG&E and sequestration projects, and other actions to reduce GHG emissions.  KU)

In December 2009,April 2014, the Kentucky Climate Action Plan Council was established to develop an action plan addressing potential GHG reductions and related measures.  In November 2011,General Assembly passed legislation which limits the Council issued a final report tomeasures that the Secretary of Kentucky'sKentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet for his consideration.  The final report acknowledged that the recommendations would require additional review and analysis prior to implementation, and that many of the recommendations would likely require,may consider in part, further legislative or regulatory actions.  The impact of any such plan is not now determinable, but the costssetting performance standards to comply with the plan couldEPA's regulations governing GHG emissions from existing sources. The legislation provides that such state GHG performance standards shall be significant.


based on emission reductions, efficiency measures, and other improvements available at each power plant, rather than renewable energy, end-use energy efficiency, fuel switching and re-dispatch. These statutory restrictions may make it more difficult for Kentucky to achieve the GHG reduction levels which the EPA has proposed for Kentucky.

(All Registrants except PPL Electric)

A number of lawsuits have been filed asserting common law claims including nuisance, trespass and negligence against various companies with GHG emitting plants and, although the decided cases to date have not sustained claims brought on


57


the basis of these theories of liability, the law remains unsettled on these claims. In September 2009, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in the case of AEP v. Connecticut reversed a federal district court's decision and ruled that several states and public interest groups, as well as the City of New York, could sue five electric utility companies under federal common law for allegedly causing a public nuisance as a result of their emissions of GHGs. In June 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the Second Circuit and held that such federal common law claims were displaced by the Clean Air Act and regulatory actions of the EPA. In addition, in Comer v. Murphy Oil (Comer case), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (Fifth Circuit) declined to overturn a district court ruling that plaintiffs did not have standing to pursue state common law claims against companies that emit GHGs. The complaint in the Comer case named the previous indirect parent of LKE as a defendant based upon emissions from the Kentucky plants. In January 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court denied a petition to reverse the Fifth Circuit's ruling. In May 2011, the plaintiffs in the Comer case filed a substantially similar

52

complaint in federal district court in Mississippi against 87 companies, including KU and three other indirect subsidiaries of LKE, under a Mississippi statute that allows the re-filing of an action in certain circumstances. In March 2012, the Mississippi federal district court granted defendants' motions to dismiss the state common law claims. Plaintiffs appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and in May 2013, the Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of the case. Additional litigation in federal and state courts over such issues is continuing. PPL, LKE and KUThe Registrants cannot predict the outcome of these lawsuits or estimate a range of reasonably possible losses, if any.


Renewable Energy Legislation


There has been interest in renewable energy legislation at both the state

(PPL and federal levels.  Federal legislation on renewable energy is not expected to be enacted this year.  PPL Electric)

In Pennsylvania, bills wereHouse Bill 100 was introduced calling for anin February 2015, proposing to increase in Alternative Energy Portfolio Standard (AEPS)AEPS solar and Tier 1 obligations and to create a $25 million permanent funding program for solar generation.  Bills (SB 1171 and HB 100) were alsotargets. A similar bill is in the process of being introduced to add natural gas as a qualified AEPS resource, and anotherin the Senate (no bill (HB 1912) would repeal the AEPS Act entirely.  All these bills remain in committee and are unlikely to advance.  A bill adding new hydropower to Montana's renewable portfolio standard was enacted with an effective date of October 1, 2013.  An interim legislative committee in Montananumber is reviewing the state's Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS)available at this time). PPL and PPL Energy SupplyElectric cannot predict atthe outcome of this time whether the committee will recommend any changes to existing laws.  In Maryland, bills have been introduced in the 2014 session to double the state's RPS requirement from 20% to 40% and provide exceptions for specific types of energy sources.  legislative effort.

(PPL)

In New Jersey, a bill (S-1475) has been introduced to increase the current RPS standardRenewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) to 30% from Class I sources by 2020. The chairman of the Senate Environmental Committee convened a workgroup to look at further changes to New Jersey's RPS law to enable New Jersey to meet emissions goals established in the state's Global Warming Response Act. A bill (S-2444) was subsequently introduced to mandate that 80% of New Jersey's electricity be generated from renewable resources by 2050. PPL and PPL Energy Supply are unable tocannot predict the outcome of this legislation at this time.


legislation.

(All Registrants)

The Registrants believe there are financial, regulatory and logisticaloperational uncertainties related to the implementation of renewable energy mandates that will need to be resolved before the impact of such requirements on them can be estimated. Such uncertainties, among others, include the need to provide back-up supply to augment intermittent renewable generation, potential generation over-supply and downward pressure on energy prices that could result from such renewable generation and back-up, impacts to PJM's capacity market and the need for substantial changes to transmission and distribution systems to accommodate renewable energy sources. These uncertainties are not directly addressed by proposed legislation. PPL and PPL Energy Supply cannot predict at this time the effect on their competitive plants' future competitive position, results of operation, cash flows and financial position of renewable energy mandates that may be adopted, although the costs to implement and comply with any such requirements could be significant.


Water/Waste


Coal Combustion Residuals (CCRs)

(All Registrants except PPL Electric)


In June 2010,

Coal Combustion Residuals (CCRs)

On April 17, 2015, the EPA proposed two approaches topublished its final rule regulating the disposal and management of CCRs (as either hazardous or non-hazardous) under the RCRA.CCRs. CCRs include fly ash, bottom ash and sulfur dioxide scrubber wastes. RegulatingThe rule will become effective on October 14, 2015. It imposes extensive new requirements, including location restrictions, design and operating standards, groundwater monitoring and corrective action requirements and closure and post-closure care requirements on CCR impoundments and landfills that are located on active power plants and not closed. Under the rule, the EPA will regulate CCRs as a hazardous wastenon-hazardous under Subtitle CD of the RCRA would materially increase costs and result in early retirements of many coal-fired plants, as it would require plants to retrofit their operations to comply with full hazardous waste requirements for the generation of CCRs and associated waste waters through generation, transportation and disposal.  This would also have a negative impact on theallow beneficial use of CCRs, with some restrictions. This self-implementing rule requires posting of compliance documentation on a publicly accessible website and could eliminate existing markets for CCRs.  The EPA's proposed approach to regulate CCRs as non-hazardous waste under Subtitle D of the RCRA would mainly affect disposal and most significantly affect any wet disposal operations.  Under this approach, many of the current markets for beneficial uses would not be affected.  Currently,is enforceable through citizen suits. PPL expects that several of its plants in Kentucky and Montana could be significantly impacted by the EPA's proposed non-hazardous waste regulations, as these plants are using surface impoundments for management and disposal of CCRs.


The EPA has issued information requests on CCRCCRs or the past management practices at numerous plants throughout the power industry as it considers whether or notof CCRs and continued use to regulate CCRs as hazardous waste.  PPL has provided information on CCR management

58


practices at most of its plants in response to the EPA's requests.  In addition, the EPA has conducted follow-up inspections to evaluate the structural stability of CCR management facilities at several PPL plants and PPL has implemented or is implementing certain actions in response to recommendations from these inspections.

The EPA is continuing to evaluate the unprecedented number of comments it received on its June 2010 proposed regulations.  In October 2011, the EPA issued a Notice of Data Availability (NODA) requesting comments on selected documents it received during the comment period for the proposed regulations.  On September 20, 2013, in response to the proposed Effluent Limitation Guidelines, PPL submitted comments on the proposed CCR regulations.  Also, on September 3, 2013, PPL commented on a second CCR NODA seeking comment on additional information related to the EPA's proposal.

A coalition of environmental groups and two CCR recycling companies have filed lawsuits against the EPA seeking a deadline for final rulemaking and, in settlement of that litigation, the EPA has agreed to issue its final rulemaking on the Subtitle D option addressed above by the end of 2014.

In July 2013, the U.S. House of Representatives passed House Bill H.R. 2218, the Coal Residuals and Reuse Management Act of 2013, which would preempt the EPA from issuing final CCR regulations and would set non-hazardous CCR standards under RCRA and authorize state permit programs.  It remains uncertain whether similar legislationmanage waste waters will be passedmost impacted by the U.S. Senate.this rule. The rule's requirements for covered CCR impoundments and landfills include commencement or completion of closure activities generally between three and ten years from certain triggering events. PPL, PPL Energy Supply, LKE, LG&E and KU cannot predict at thisalso anticipate incurring capital or operation and maintenance costs prior to that time the final requirementsto address other provisions of the EPA's CCR regulationsrule, such as groundwater monitoring and disposal facility modifications, or potential changes to implement various compliance strategies.

PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU are reviewing the RCRArule and what impact they would have on their facilities, but theare still evaluating its financial and operational impact. It is expected that these requirements will result in increases to existing AROs which will be recorded in the second quarter of 2015. PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU are not yet able to determine an estimate of the expected increases to the existing AROs. PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU believe relevant costs relating to this rule are subject to future rate recovery before the respective state regulatory agencies, or the FERC, as applicable.

53

Effluent Limitations Guidelines (ELGs) and Standards

In June 2013, the EPA published proposed regulations to revise discharge limitations for steam electric generation wastewater permits. The proposed limitations are based on the EPA review of available treatment technologies and their capacity for reducing pollutants and include new requirements for fly ash and bottom ash transport water and metal cleaning waste waters, as well as new limits for scrubber wastewater and landfill leachate. The EPA's proposed ELG regulations contain requirements that would affect the inspection and operation of CCR facilities if finalized as proposed. The proposal contains alternative approaches, some of which could significantly impact PPL's, PPL Energy Supply's, LKE's, LG&E's and KU's coal-fired plants. The final regulation is expected to be material if CCRsissued by the third or fourth quarter of 2015. At the present time, PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU are regulated as hazardous wasteunable to predict the outcome of this matter or estimate a range of reasonably possible costs, but the costs could be significant. Pending finalization of the ELGs, certain states (including Pennsylvania and Kentucky) and environmental groups are proposing more stringent technology-based limits in permit renewals. Depending on the final limits imposed, the costs of compliance could be significant if regulated as non-hazardous.


and costs could be imposed ahead of federal timelines.

Trimble County Landfill Permit (PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)


In May 2011, LG&E submitted an application for a special waste landfill permit to handle coal combustion residualsCCRs generated at the Trimble County plant. After extensive review of the permit application inIn May 2013, the Kentucky Division of Waste Management denied the permit application on the grounds that the proposed facility would violate the Kentucky Cave Protection Act because it would eliminate an on-site karst feature considered to be a cave. After assessing additional options for managing coal combustion residuals, inIn January 2014, LG&E submitted to the Kentucky Division of Waste Management a landfill permit application for an alternate site adjacent to the plant. LG&E has also applied for other necessary regulatory approvals including a dredge and fill permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, in which proceeding the EPA or the public have submitted certain comments to which LG&E and KU are responding. PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU are unable to determine the potential impact of this matter until a landfill permit isall permits are issued and any resulting legal challenges are concluded.


Seepages and Groundwater Infiltration - Pennsylvania, Montana and Kentucky


(All Registrants except PPL Electric)


Seepages or groundwater infiltration have been detected at active and retired wastewater basins and landfills at various PPL, PPL Energy Supply, LKE, LG&E and KU plants. PPL, PPL Energy Supply, LKE, LG&E and KU have completed or are completing assessments of seepages or groundwater infiltration at various facilities and have completed or are working with agencies to respond to notices of violations and implement assessment or abatement measures, where required or applicable. A range of reasonably possible losses cannot currently be estimated.


(PPL and PPL Energy Supply)

(PPL)

In August 2012, PPL Montana entered into an Administrative Order on Consent (AOC) with the MDEQ which establishes a comprehensive process to investigate and remediate groundwater seepage impacts related to the wastewater facilities at the Colstrip power plant. The AOC requires that within five years, PPL Montana provide financial assurance to the MDEQ for the costs associated with closure and future monitoring of the waste-water treatment facilities. PPL Montana cannot predict at this time if the actions required under the AOC will create the need to adjust the existing ARO related to these facilities.


this facility.

In September 2012, Earthjustice filed an affidavit pursuant to Montana's Major Facility Siting Act (MFSA) that sought review of the AOC by Montana's Board of Environmental Review (BER) on behalf of the Sierra Club, the MEIC and the National Wildlife Federation. In September 2012, PPL Montana filed an election with the BER to have this proceeding conducted in Montana state district court as contemplated by the MFSA. In October 2012, Earthjustice filed a petition for review of the AOC in the Montana state district court in Rosebud County. This matter was stayed in December 2012. In April 2014, Earthjustice filed a motion for leave to amend the petition for review and to lift the stay.



59


stay which was granted by the court in May 2014. PPL Montana and the MDEQ responded to the amended petition and filed partial motions to dismiss in July 2014, which were both denied in October 2014. Discovery is ongoing, and a bench trial is set for April 2016.

Clean Water Act 316(b)(All Registrants except PPL Electric)


Clean Water Act

The EPA published its proposedEPA's final 316(b) rule under 316(b) for existing facilities became effective in April 2011.  The EPA has been evaluating the comments it received to the proposed ruleOctober 2014, and meeting with industry groups to discuss options.  The proposed rule contains two requirements to reduce impact to aquatic organisms atregulates cooling water intake structures.structures and their impact on aquatic organisms. States are allowed considerable authority to make site-specific determinations under the rule. The firstrule requires all existing facilities to meet standards forchoose between several options to reduce the reduction of mortality ofimpact to aquatic organisms that become trapped against water intake screens (impingement) regardless of the levels of mortality actually occurring or the cost to achieve the standards.  The second requirement isand to determine and install the best technology available to reduce mortality ofintake structure's impact on aquatic organisms pulled through a plant's cooling water system (entrainment). A formPlants already equipped with closed-cycle cooling, an acceptable option, would likely not incur substantial costs. Once-through systems would likely

54

require additional technology to comply with the rule. Mill Creek Unit 1 and Brunner Island (all units) are the only units expected to be impacted. PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU are evaluating compliance strategies but do not presently expect the compliance costs to be material.

(All Registrants)

Waters of cost-benefit analysisthe United States (WOTUS)

In April 2014, the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Army Corps) published a proposed rule defining WOTUS that could greatly expand the federal government's interpretation of what constitutes WOTUS subject to regulation under the Clean Water Act. If the definition is allowedexpanded as proposed by the EPA and the Army Corps, permits and other regulatory requirements may be imposed for this second requirement involving a site-specific evaluationmany matters presently not covered (including vegetation management for transmission lines and activities affecting storm water conveyances and wetlands), the implications of which could be significant. The EPA plans to make certain changes to the proposed regulation based on nine factors, including impactscomments received. The U.S. House and Senate are considering legislation to energy delivery reliability andblock this regulation. Until a final rule is issued, the remaining useful lifeRegistrants cannot predict the outcome of the plant.  Thepending rulemaking. A final rule is expected by May 16, 2014. Until the final rule is issued, PPL, PPL Energy Supply, LKE, LG&E and KU cannot estimate a range of reasonably possible costs, if any, that would be required to comply with such a regulation.


Effluent Limitations Guidelines (ELGs) and Standards

In June 2013, the EPA published proposed regulations to revise discharge limitations for steam electric generation wastewater permits.  The proposed limitations are based on the EPA review of available treatment technologies and their capacity for reducing pollutants and include new requirements for fly ash and bottom ash transport water and metal cleaning waste waters, as well as new limits for scrubber wastewater and landfill leachate.  The EPA's proposed ELG regulations contain requirements that would affect the inspection and operation of CCR facilities, if finalized.  The EPA has indicated that it will coordinate these regulations with the regulation of CCRs discussed above.  The proposal contains alternative approaches, some of which could significantly impact PPL's coal-fired plants.  PPL, PPL Energy Supply, LKE, LG&E and KU worked with industry groups to comment on the proposed regulation on September 20, 2013.  The EPA has agreed to a new deadline for the final rule of September 30,summer 2015.  At the present time, PPL, PPL Energy Supply, LKE, LG&E and KU are unable to predict the outcome of this matter or estimate a range of reasonably possible costs, but the costs could be significant.  Pending finalization of the ELGs, certain states (including Pennsylvania and Kentucky) and environmental groups are proposing more stringent technology-based limits in permit renewals.  Depending on the final limits imposed, the costs of compliance could be significant and costs could be imposed ahead of federal timelines.

Other Issues


(All Registrants)

The EPA is reassessing its polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) (PCB) regulations under the Toxic Substance Control Act, which currently allow certain PCB articles to remain in use. In April 2010, the EPA issued an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for changes to these regulations. This rulemaking could lead to a phase-out of all or some PCB-containing equipment. The EPA is planning to propose the revised regulations in November 2014.2015. PCBs are found, in varying degrees, in all of the Registrants' operations. The Registrants cannot predict at this time the outcome of these proposed EPA regulations and what impact, if any, they would have on their facilities, but the costs could be significant.


On April 21, 2014, the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Army Corps) published the proposed rule defining waters of the United States (WOTUS) that could significantly expand the federal government's interpretation of what constitutes WOTUS subject to regulation under the Clean Water Act.  The comment deadline is July 21, 2014.  If the definition is expanded as proposed by the EPA and the Army Corps, permits and other regulatory requirements may be imposed for many matters presently not covered (including vegetation management for transmission lines and activities affecting storm water conveyances and wetlands), the implications of which could be significant. Any eventual expansion of this interpretation cannot reliably be estimated at this time but would not be expected to have a material financial impact on the registrants.

(PPL and PPL Energy Supply)

(PPL)

A subsidiary of PPL Energy Supply has investigated alternatives to exclude fish from the discharge channel at its Brunner Island plant. In June 2012, a Consent Order and Agreement (COA) with the PADEP was signed, allowing the subsidiary to study a change in a cooling tower operational method that may keep fish from entering the channel. The COA required a retrofit of impingement control technology at the intakes to the cooling towers, at a cost that would have been significant. Based on the results of the first year of study, the PADEP has suggested closing the COA and writing a new COA to resolve the issue. PPL is in negotiations with the agency at this time. PPL and PPL Energy Supply cannot predict at this time the outcome of the proposed new COA and what impact, if any, it would have on their facilities, but the costs could be significant.


60


(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)


In May 2010, the Kentucky Waterways Alliance and other environmental groups filed a petition with the Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet challenging the Kentucky Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit issued in April 2010, which covers water discharges from the Trimble County plant. In November 2010, the Cabinet issued a final order upholding the permit. In December 2010, the environmental groups appealed the order to the Trimble Circuit Court, but the case was subsequently transferred to the Franklin Circuit Court. In September 2013, the court reversed the Cabinet order upholding the permit and remanded the permit to the agency for further proceedings. In October 2013, LG&E filed a notice of appeal with the Kentucky Court of Appeals. In February 2015, oral arguments occurred in the appellate proceeding. PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU are unable to predict the outcome of this matter or estimate a range of reasonably possible losses, if any.


Superfund and Other Remediation(All Registrants)


PPL Electric is potentially responsible for costs at several sites listed by the EPA under the federal Superfund program, including the Columbia Gas Plant site, the Metal Bank site, the Brodhead site and the Ward Transformer site. Clean-up actions have been or are being undertaken at all of these sites, the costs of which have not been significant to PPL Electric. However, should the EPA require different or additional measures in the future, or should PPL Electric's share of costs at multi-party sites increase substantially more than currently expected, the costs could be significant.


PPL Electric, LG&E and KU are remediating, or have completed the remediation of, or are responding to agency inquiries regarding several sites that were not addressed under a regulatory program such as Superfund, but for which PPL Electric, LG&E and KU may be liable for remediation. These include a number of former coal gas manufacturing plants in Pennsylvania and Kentucky previously owned or operated or currently owned by predecessors or affiliates of PPL Electric, LG&E and KU. To date, the costs of these sites have not been significant. There are additional sites, formerly owned or

55

operated by PPL Electric, LG&E and KU predecessors or affiliates, for which PPL Electric, LG&E and KU lack information on current site conditions and are therefore unable to predict what, if any, potential liability they may have.


Depending on the outcome of investigations at sites where investigations have not begun or been completed or developments at sites for which PPL Electric, LG&E and KU currently lack information, the costs of remediation and other liabilities could be material. PPL, PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU cannot estimate a range of reasonably possible losses, if any, related to these matters.


The EPA is evaluating the risks associated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and naphthalene, chemical by-products of coal gas manufacturing. As a result of the EPA's evaluation, individual states may establish stricter standards for water quality and soil cleanup. This could require several PPL subsidiaries to take more extensive assessment and remedial actions at former coal gas manufacturing plants. PPL, PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU cannot estimate a range of reasonably possible losses, if any, related to these matters.


From time to time, PPL Energy Supply, PPL Electric, LG&E and KUPPL's subsidiaries undertake remedial action in response to notices of violations, spills or other releases at various on-site and off-site locations, negotiate with the EPA and state and local agencies regarding actions necessary for compliance with applicable requirements, negotiate with property owners and other third parties alleging impacts from PPL's operations and undertake similar actions necessary to resolve environmental matters whichthat arise in the course of normal operations. Based on analyses to date, resolution of these environmental matters is not expected to have a significant adverse impact on these Registrants' operations.


the operations of PPL, PPL Electric, LG&E and KU.

Future cleanup or remediation work at sites currently under review, or at sites not currently identified, may result in significant additional costs for the Registrants.


PPL, PPL Electric, LG&E and KU.

Environmental Matters - WPD(PPL)(PPL)


WPD's distribution businesses are subject to environmental regulatory and statutory requirements. PPL believes that WPD has taken and continues to take measures to comply with the applicable laws and governmental regulations for the protection of the environment.


Other


Nuclear Insurance(PPL)(PPL and PPL Energy Supply)


The Price-Anderson Act is a United States Federal law which governsgoverning liability-related issues and ensures the availability of funds for public liability claims arising from an incident at any of the U.S. licensed nuclear facilities.facility. It also seeks to limit the


61


liability of nuclear reactor owners for such claims from any single incident. Effective September 10, 2013,At March 31, 2015, the liability limit per incident is $13.6 billion for such claims which is funded by insurance coverage from American Nuclear Insurers and an industry assessment program.

Under the industry assessment program, in the event of a nuclear incident at any of the reactors covered by The Price-Anderson Act, as amended, PPL Susquehanna could be assessed up to $255 million per incident, payable at $38 million per year.


Additionally, PPL Susquehanna purchases property insurance programs from NEIL, an industry mutual insurance company of which PPL Susquehanna is a member. Effective April 1, 2014,At March 31, 2015, facilities at the Susquehannaplant are insured against property damage losses up to $2.0 billion. PPL Susquehanna also purchases an insurance program that provides coverage for the cost of replacement power during prolonged outages of nuclear units caused by certain specified conditions.


Under the NEIL property and replacement power insurance programs, PPL Susquehanna could be assessed retrospective premiums in the event of the insurers' adverse loss experience. This maximum assessment is $46 million at March 31, 2015. Effective April 1, 2015, this maximum assessment increased to $55 million.


Pennsylvania Coal Plants(PPL and PPL Energy Supply)

PPL Energy Supply believes its competitive coal-fired generation assets in Pennsylvania are well positioned to meet current environmental requirements based on prior and planned investments.  However, the current levels of energy and capacity prices in PJM, as well as management's forward view of these prices using its fundamental pricing models, continue to challenge the recoverability of PPL Energy Supply's investment in its Pennsylvania coal-fired generation assets.  In the fourth quarter of 2013, management tested the Brunner Island and Montour plants for impairment and concluded neither was impaired as of December 31, 2013.  The recoverability test was very sensitive to forward energy and capacity price assumptions, as well as forecasted operation and maintenance and capital spending.  Therefore, a further decline in forecasted long-term energy or capacity prices or changes in environmental laws requiringhas additional capital or operation and maintenance expenditures, could negatively impact PPL Energy Supply's operations of these facilities and potentially result in future impairment charges for some or all of the carrying value of these plants.  There were no events or changes in circumstancescoverage that, indicated a recoverability test was required in the first quarter of 2014.  However, PPL Energy Supply will be closely monitoring the PJM capacity auction results in May 2014, which could require a recoverability test to be performed in the second quarter of 2014.  The carrying value of the Pennsylvania coal-fired generation assets was $2.6 billion as of March 31, 2014 ($1.4 billion for Brunner Island and $1.2 billion for Montour).

Labor Unions(PPL, PPL Energy Supply and PPL Electric)

On May 11, 2014, PPL's, PPL Energy Supply's and PPL Electric's bargaining agreement with its largest IBEW local expires.  The agreement covers approximately 20% of PPL's, 24% of PPL Energy Supply's and 63% of PPL Electric's total workforce.  Negotiations on a new agreement commenced in January 2014 and are continuing.  PPL, PPL Energy Supply and PPL Electric cannot predict the outcome of these negotiations.  If there were to be a work stoppage, a significant disruption of operations could occur which could have an adverse financial impact.  To help mitigate such risks, PPL, PPL Energy Supply and PPL Electric have been making preparations to maintain critical services.  

under certain conditions, may reduce this exposure.

Guarantees and Other Assurances


(All Registrants)


In the normal course of business, the Registrants enter into agreements that provide financial performance assurance to third parties on behalf of certain subsidiaries. Such agreements include, for example, guarantees, stand-by letters of credit issued by financial institutions and surety bonds issued by insurance companies. These agreements are entered into primarily to support or enhance the creditworthiness attributed to a subsidiary on a stand-alone basis or to facilitate the commercial activities in which these subsidiaries engage.

56

(PPL)


PPL fully and unconditionally guarantees all of the debt securities of PPL Capital Funding.


(All Registrants)


The table below details guarantees provided as of March 31, 2014.2015. "Exposure" represents the estimated maximum potential amount of future payments that could be required to be made under the guarantee. The probability of expected payment/performance under each of these guarantees is remote except for "WPD guarantee of pension and other obligations of unconsolidated entities", "Indemnification for sales of assets" and "Indemnification of lease termination and other divestitures." The total recorded liability at


62


March 31, 20142015 and December 31, 2013,2014, was $26$37 million and $38 million for PPL and $19 million for LKE.LKE for both periods. For reporting purposes, on a consolidated basis, all guarantees of PPL Energy Supply (other than the letters of credit), PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU also apply to PPL, and all guarantees of LG&E and KU also apply to LKE.

  Exposure at Expiration
  March 31, 2014 Date
PPL      
Indemnifications related to the WPD Midlands acquisition       (a)  
WPD indemnifications for entities in liquidation and sales of assets  $ 12  (b) 2017 - 2018
WPD guarantee of pension and other obligations of unconsolidated entities    128  (c)  
       
PPL Energy Supply      
Letters of credit issued on behalf of affiliates    30  (d) 2014 - 2015
Indemnifications for sales of assets    250  (e) 2025
Guarantee of a portion of a divested unconsolidated entity's debt    22  (f) 2018
       
PPL Electric      
Guarantee of inventory value    32  (g) 2017
       
LKE      
Indemnification of lease termination and other divestitures    301  (h) 2021 - 2023
       
LG&E and KU      
LG&E and KU guarantee of shortfall related to OVEC       (i)  

  Exposure at Expiration
  March 31, 2015 Date
PPL      
Indemnifications related to the WPD Midlands acquisition   (a)  
WPD indemnifications for entities in liquidation and sales of assets $ 11(b) 2018
WPD guarantee of pension and other obligations of unconsolidated entities   114(c)  
Indemnifications for sales of assets   1,150(d) 2016 - 2025
       
PPL Electric      
Guarantee of inventory value   32(e) 2017
       
LKE      
Indemnification of lease termination and other divestitures   301(f) 2021 - 2023
       
LG&E and KU      
LG&E and KU guarantee of shortfall related to OVEC   (g)  

(a)Indemnifications related to certain liabilities, including a specific unresolved tax issue and those relating to properties and assets owned by the seller that were transferred to WPD Midlands in connection with the acquisition. A cross indemnity has been received from the seller on the tax issue.The maximum exposure and expiration of these indemnifications cannot be estimated because the maximum potential liability is not capped and the expiration date is not specified in the transaction documents.
(b)Indemnification to the liquidators and certain others for existing liabilities or expenses or liabilities arising during the liquidation process. The indemnifications are limited to distributions made from the subsidiary to its parent either prior or subsequent to liquidation or isare not explicitly stated in the agreements. The indemnifications generally expire two to seven years subsequent to the date of dissolution of the entities. The exposure noted only includes those cases where the agreements provide for specific limits.

In connection with their sales of various businesses, WPD and its affiliates have provided the purchasers with indemnifications that are standard for such transactions, including indemnifications for certain pre-existing liabilities and environmental and tax matters or have agreed to continue their obligations under existing third-party guarantees, either for a set period of time following the transactions or upon the condition that the purchasers make reasonable efforts to terminate the guarantees.  Finally, WPD and its affiliates remain secondarily responsible for lease payments under certain leases that they have assigned to third parties.

In connection with their sales of various businesses, WPD and its affiliates have provided the purchasers with indemnifications that are standard for such transactions, including indemnifications for certain pre-existing liabilities and environmental and tax matters or have agreed to continue their obligations under existing third-party guarantees, either for a set period of time following the transactions or upon the condition that the purchasers make reasonable efforts to terminate the guarantees. Finally, WPD and its affiliates remain secondarily responsible for lease payments under certain leases that they have assigned to third parties.
(c)Relates to certain obligations of discontinued or modified electric associations that were guaranteed at the time of privatization by the participating members. Costs are allocated to the members and can be reallocated if an existing member becomes insolvent. At March 31, 2014,2015, WPD has recorded an estimated discounted liability for which the expected payment/performance is probable. Neither the expiration date nor the maximum amount of potential payments for certain obligations is explicitly stated in the related agreements, and as a result, the exposure has been estimated.
(d)Standby letter of credit arrangements under PPL Energy Supply's credit facilities for the purposes of protecting various third parties against nonperformance by PPL.  This is not a guarantee by PPL on a consolidated basis.
(e)Indemnifications are governed by the specific sales agreement and include breach of the representations, warranties and covenants, and liabilities for certain other matters. PPL Energy Supply'sThe maximum exposure with respect to certain indemnifications and the expiration of the indemnifications cannot be estimated because the maximum potential liability is not capped by the transaction documents and the expiration date is based on the applicable statute of limitations. The exposure and expiration date noted is based on those cases in which the agreements provide for specific limits.
(f)Relates The exposure at March 31, 2015 includes amounts related to a guarantee of one-thirdthe sale of the divested entity's debt.  The purchaser provided a cross-indemnity, secured by a lien onMontana Hydroelectric facilities. See Note 8 for additional information related to the purchaser's stock of the divested entity.  The exposure noted reflects principal only.sale.
(g)(e)A third party logistics firm provides inventory procurement and fulfillment services. The logistics firm has title to the inventory, however, upon termination of the contracts, PPL Electric has guaranteed to purchase any remaining inventory that has not been used or sold.
(h)(f)LKE provides certain indemnifications, the most significant of which relate to the termination of the WKE lease in July 2009. These guarantees cover the due and punctual payment, performance and discharge by each party of its respective present and future obligations. The most comprehensive of these WKE-related guarantees is the LKE guarantee covering operational, regulatory and environmental commitments and indemnifications made by WKE under the WKE Transaction Termination Agreement. This guarantee has a term of 12 years ending July 2021, and a cumulative maximum exposure of $200 million. Certain items such as government fines and penalties fall outside the cumulative cap. Another WKE-related LKE guarantee covers other indemnifications, has contested the applicability of the indemnification requirement relating to one matter presented by a counterparty under this guarantee.  Another guarantee withterm expiring in 2023, and a maximum exposure of $100 million covering other indemnifications expires in 2023.million. In May 2012, LKE's indemnitee received an unfavorable arbitration panel's decision affectinginterpreting this matter, which granted LKE's indemnitee certain rights of first refusal to purchase excess power at a market-based price rather than at an absolute fixed price. In January 2013, LKE's indemnitee commenced a proceeding in the Kentucky Court of Appeals appealing thea December 2012 order of the Henderson Circuit Court, confirming the arbitration award. A decisionIn May 2014, the Court of Appeals issued an opinion affirming the lower court decision.  LKE's indemnitee filed a Motion for Discretionary Review with the Kentucky Supreme Court in the appellate matter may occur duringOctober 2014.  LKE believes its indemnification obligations in this matter remain subject to various uncertainties, including potential for additional legal challenges regarding the arbitration decision as well as future prices, availability and demand for the subject excess power. LKE continues to evaluate various legal and commercial options with respect to this indemnification matter. The ultimate outcomes of the WKE termination-related indemnifications cannot be predicted at this time. Additionally, LKE has indemnified various third parties related to historical obligations for other divested subsidiaries and affiliates. The indemnifications vary by entity and the maximum exposures range from being capped at the sale price to no specified maximum; however, LKE is not aware of formal claims under such indemnities made by any party at this time.  LKE could be required to perform on these indemnifications in the event of covered losses or liabilities being claimed by an indemnified party.  LKE cannot predict the ultimate outcomes of such indemnification circumstances, but does not currently expect such outcomes to result in significant losses above the amounts recorded.
57

63


(i)

indemnified party. However, LKE is not aware of formal claims under such indemnities made by any party at this time. LKE cannot predict the ultimate outcomes of indemnification circumstances, but does not currently expect such outcomes to result in significant losses above the amounts recorded.

(g)Pursuant to the OVEC power purchase contract, LG&E and KU are obligated to pay for their share of OVEC's excess debt service, post-retirement and decommissioning costs, as well as any shortfall from amounts currently included within a demand charge designed and currently expected to cover these costs over the term of the contract.The maximum exposure and the expiration date of these potential obligations are not presently determinable. See "Energy Purchase Commitments" and "Guarantees and Other Assurances" in Note 1513 in PPL's, LKE's, LG&E's and KU's 20132014 Form 10-K for additional information on the OVEC power purchase contract.

The Registrants provide other miscellaneous guarantees through contracts entered into in the normal course of business. These guarantees are primarily in the form of indemnification or warranties related to services or equipment and vary in duration. The amounts of these guarantees often are not explicitly stated, and the overall maximum amount of the obligation under such guarantees cannot be reasonably estimated. Historically, no significant payments have been made with respect to these types of guarantees and the probability of payment/performance under these guarantees is remote.


PPL, on behalf of itself and certain of its subsidiaries, maintains insurance that covers liability assumed under contract for bodily injury and property damage. The coverage provides maximum aggregate coverage of $225 million. This insurance may be applicable to obligations under certain of these contractual arrangements.


11. Related Party Transactions


PLR Contracts/Purchase of Accounts Receivable(PPL Energy Supply and PPL Electric)


PPL Electric holds competitive solicitations for PLR generation supply. PPL EnergyPlus has been awarded a portion of the PLR generation supply through these competitive solicitations. The sales and purchases betweenfrom PPL EnergyPlus and PPL Electric are included in thePPL Electric's Statements of Income as "Unregulated wholesale energy to affiliate" by PPL Energy Supply and as "Energy purchases from affiliate" by PPL Electric.


.

Under the standard Default Service Supply Master Agreement for the solicitation process, PPL Electric requires all suppliers to post collateral once credit exposures exceed defined credit limits. PPL EnergyPlus is required to post collateral with PPL Electric:Electric when: (a) when the market price of electricity to be delivered by PPL EnergyPlus exceeds the contract price for the forecasted quantity of electricity to be delivereddelivered; and (b) this market price exposure exceeds a contractual credit limit. Based on the currentPPL EnergyPlus does not have an established credit rating of PPL Energy Supply, as guarantor, PPL EnergyPlus' credit limit was $20 million atlimit. At March 31, 2014.2015, PPL EnergyPlus was not required to post collateral. In no instance is PPL Electric required to post collateral to suppliers under these supply contracts.


PPL Electric's customers may choose an alternative supplier for their generation supply. See Note 2 for additional information regarding PPL Electric's purchases of accounts receivable from alternative suppliers, including PPL EnergyPlus.


At March 31, 2014, PPL Energy Supply had a net credit exposure of $29 million from PPL Electric from its commitment as a PLR supplier and from the sale of its accounts receivable to PPL Electric.

Support Costs(All Registrants except PPL)


Both

PPL Services and LKS provide thetheir respective PPL and LKE subsidiaries with administrative, management and support services.  Where applicable,In 2015, PPL EU Services was formed to provide the majority of financial, supply chain, human resources and facilities management services primarily to PPL Electric.  PPL Services will continue to provide certain corporate functions. For all service companies, the costs of these services are charged to the respective subsidiariesrecipients as direct support costs.  General costs that cannot be directly attributed to a specific subsidiaryentity are allocated and charged to the respective subsidiariesrecipients as indirect support costs.  PPL Services usesand PPL EU Services use a three-factor methodology that includes the subsidiaries'applicable recipients' invested capital, operation and maintenance expenses and number of employees to allocate indirect costs.  LKS bases its indirect allocations on the subsidiaries' number of employees, total assets, revenues, number of customers and/or other statistical information.PPL Services, PPL EU Services and LKS charged the following amounts for the periods ended March 31, and believe these amounts are reasonable, including amounts applied to accounts that are further distributed between capital and expense.


    Three Months
      2014  2013 
             
PPL Energy Supply from PPL Services       $ 58  $ 57 
PPL Electric from PPL Services         41    38 
LKE from PPL Services         4    4 
LG&E from LKS        48   39 
KU from LKS        53   66 

    Three Months
      2015 2014
             
PPL Electric from PPL Services       $ 30 $ 41
LKE from PPL Services         4   4
PPL Electric from PPL EU Services         15   
             
LG&E from LKS         51   48
KU from LKS         56   53

LG&E and KU also provide services to each other and to LKS. Billings between LG&E and KU relate to labor and overheads associated with union and hourly employees performing work for the other company, charges related to jointly-owned generating units and other miscellaneous charges. Tax settlements between LKE and LG&E and LKE and KU are reimbursed through LKS.


58
64


Intercompany Borrowings


(PPL Electric)

A PPL Electric subsidiary periodically holds revolving demand notes from certain affiliates.  At March 31, 2014, there was no balance outstanding.  At December 31, 2013, $150 million was outstanding and was reflected in "Notes receivable from affiliate" on the Balance Sheet.  The interest rates on borrowings are equal to one-month LIBOR plus a spread.  The interest rate on the outstanding borrowing at December 31, 2013, was 1.92%.  Interest earned on these revolving facilities was not significant for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013.

(LKE)

LKE maintains a $225 million revolving line of credit with a PPL Energy Funding subsidiary whereby LKE can borrow funds on a short-term basis at market-based rates. The interest rate on borrowings is equal to one-month LIBOR plus a spread.  There were no balances outstanding atAt March 31, 20142015 and December 31, 2013.


LKE maintains an agreement with a PPL affiliate that has a $300 million borrowing limit whereby LKE can loan funds on a short-term basis at market-based rates.  At March 31, 2014, $40 and December 31, 2013, $4 million and $70$41 million were outstanding and were reflected in "Notes receivable frompayable with affiliates" on the consolidated Balance Sheets. The interest rate on the loan based on the PPL affiliate's credit ratingborrowings is currently equal to one-month LIBOR plus a spread. The interest rates on the outstanding borrowing at March 31, 20142015 and December 31, 20132014 were 2.16%1.67% and 2.17%1.65%. Interest income on this notethe revolving line of credit was not significant for the three months ended March 31, 20142015 and 2013.

2014.

Intercompany Derivatives(LKE, LG&E and KU)

Periodically, LG&E and KU enter into forward-starting interest rate swaps with PPL. These hedging instruments have terms identical to forward-starting swaps entered into by PPL with third parties. See Note 14 for additional information on intercompany derivatives.

Other(All Registrants except PPL Electric, LG&E and LKE)


KU)

See Note 9 for discussions regarding intercompany allocations associated with defined benefits.


12. Other Income (Expense) - net


(All Registrants)

(PPL)

The breakdowncomponents of "Other Income (Expense) - net" for the periods ended March 31 was:


          Three Months
        2014  2013 
PPL            
Other Income            
 Earnings on securities in NDT funds       $ 6  $ 5 
 Interest income         1    1 
 AFUDC - equity component         3    3 
 Miscellaneous - Domestic         2    2 
 Miscellaneous - U.K.              1 
 Total Other Income         12    12 
Other Expense            
 Economic foreign currency exchange contracts (Note 14)         24    (119)
 Charitable contributions         7    4 
 Miscellaneous - Domestic         3    4 
 Miscellaneous - U.K.         1    1 
 Total Other Expense           35    (110)
Other Income (Expense) - net       $ (23) $ 122 

were:

    Three Months
    2015 2014
Other Income      
 Earnings on securities in NDT funds $ 7 $ 6
 Interest income   1   1
 AFUDC - equity component   4   3
 Miscellaneous   5   2
 Total Other Income   17   12
Other Expense      
 Economic foreign currency exchange contracts (Note 14)   (88)   24
 Charitable contributions   5   7
 Spinoff of PPL Energy Supply transaction costs (Note 8)   2     
 Miscellaneous   3   4
 Total Other Expense   (78)   35
Other Income (Expense) - net $ 95 $ (23)

(All Registrants except PPL)

The components of "Other Income (Expense) - net" for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 and 2013 for PPL Energy Supply, PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU were not significant.


13. Fair Value Measurements and Credit Concentration


(All Registrants)


Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price). A market approach (generally, data from market transactions), an income approach (generally, present value techniques and option-pricing models), and/or a cost approach (generally, replacement cost) are used to measure the fair value of an asset or liability, as appropriate. These valuation approaches incorporate inputs such as observable, independent market data and/or unobservable data that management believes are


65


predicated on the assumptions market participants would use to price an asset or liability. These inputs may incorporate, as applicable, certain risks such as nonperformance risk, which includes credit risk. The fair value of a group of financial assets and liabilities is measured on a net basis.  Transfersbasis.Transfers between levels are recognized at end-of-reporting-period values. During the three months ended March 31, 20142015 and 2013,2014, there were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2. See Note 1 in each Registrant's 20132014 Form 10-K for information on the levels in the fair value hierarchy.

59

Recurring Fair Value Measurements


The assets and liabilities measured at fair value were:

     March 31, 2015 December 31, 2014
     Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
PPL                        
Assets                        
 Cash and cash equivalents $ 1,335 $ 1,335       $ 1,751 $ 1,751      
 Short-term investments   135   135         120   120      
 Restricted cash and cash equivalents (a)   231   231         224   224      
 Price risk management assets:                        
  Energy commodities   1,298   2 $ 1,136 $ 160   1,318   6 $ 1,171 $ 141
  Foreign currency contracts   209      209      130      130   
  Cross-currency swaps   49      49      29      28   1
 Total price risk management assets   1,556   2   1,394   160   1,477   6   1,329   142
 NDT funds:                        
  Cash and cash equivalents   20   20         19   19      
  Equity securities                        
   U.S. large-cap   620   461   159      611   454   157   
   U.S. mid/small-cap   93   38   55      89   37   52   
  Debt securities                        
   U.S. Treasury   97   97         99   99      
   U.S. government sponsored agency   8      8      9      9   
   Municipality   76      76      76      76   
   Investment-grade corporate   45      45      42      42   
   Other   3      3      3      3   
  Receivables (payables), net   3   1   2      2      2   
 Total NDT funds   965   617   348      950   609   341   
 Auction rate securities (b)   10         10   10         10
Total assets $ 4,232 $ 2,320 $ 1,742 $ 170 $ 4,532 $ 2,710 $ 1,670 $ 152
                            
Liabilities                        
 Price risk management liabilities:                        
  Energy commodities $ 1,163 $ 2 $ 1,130 $ 31 $ 1,217 $ 5 $ 1,182 $ 30
  Interest rate swaps   235      235      156      156   
  Foreign currency contracts   6      6      2      2   
  Cross-currency swaps   2      2      3      3   
 Total price risk management liabilities $ 1,406 $ 2 $ 1,373 $ 31 $ 1,378 $ 5 $ 1,343 $ 30
                            
PPL Electric                        
Assets                        
 Cash and cash equivalents $ 35 $ 35       $ 214 $ 214      
 Restricted cash and cash equivalents (c)   2   2         3   3      
Total assets $ 37 $ 37       $ 217 $ 217      

LKE                        
Assets                        
 Cash and cash equivalents        $ 40 $ 40       $ 21 $ 21      
 Cash collateral posted to counterparties (d)   22   22         21   21      
Total assets $ 62 $ 62       $ 42 $ 42      
                            
Liabilities                        
 Price risk management liabilities:                        
  Interest rate swaps $ 174    $ 174    $ 114    $ 114   
Total price risk management liabilities $ 174    $ 174    $ 114    $ 114   
                            
LG&E                        
Assets                        
 Cash and cash equivalents $ 17 $ 17       $ 10 $ 10      
 Cash collateral posted to counterparties (d)   22   22         21   21      
Total assets $ 39 $ 39       $ 31 $ 31      
                            
Liabilities                        
 Price risk management liabilities:                        
  Interest rate swaps $ 113    $ 113    $ 81    $ 81   
Total price risk management liabilities $ 113    $ 113    $ 81    $ 81   
                            

     March 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
     Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
PPL                        
Assets                        
 Cash and cash equivalents $ 1,256  $ 1,256            $ 1,102  $ 1,102           
 Restricted cash and cash equivalents (a)   491    491              156    156           
 Price risk management assets:                        
  Energy commodities   1,417    2  $ 1,330  $ 85    1,188    3  $ 1,123  $ 62 
  Interest rate swaps   9         9         91         91      
  Foreign currency contracts   5         5                          
 Total price risk management assets   1,431    2    1,344    85    1,279    3    1,214    62 
 NDT funds:                        
  Cash and cash equivalents   13    13              14    14           
  Equity securities                                        
   U.S. large-cap   556    415    141         547    409    138      
   U.S. mid/small-cap   83    34    49         81    33    48      
  Debt securities                                        
   U.S. Treasury   95    95              95    95           
   U.S. government sponsored agency   6         6         6         6      
   Municipality   80         80         77         77      
   Investment-grade corporate   41         41         38         38      
   Other   4         4         5         5      
  Receivables (payables), net   1    (1)   2         1    (1)   2      
 Total NDT funds   879    556    323         864    550    314      
 Auction rate securities (b)   16              16    19              19 
Total assets $ 4,073  $ 2,305  $ 1,667  $ 101  $ 3,420  $ 1,811  $ 1,528  $ 81 
                            
Liabilities                        
 Price risk management liabilities:                        
  Energy commodities $ 1,527  $ 1  $ 1,458  $ 68  $ 1,070  $ 4  $ 1,028  $ 38 
  Interest rate swaps   47         47         36         36      
  Foreign currency contracts   123         123         106         106      
  Cross-currency swaps   55         55         32         32      
 Total price risk management liabilities $ 1,752  $ 1  $ 1,683  $ 68  $ 1,244  $ 4  $ 1,202  $ 38 
                            
PPL Energy Supply                        
Assets                        
 Cash and cash equivalents $ 441  $ 441            $ 239  $ 239           
 Restricted cash and cash equivalents (a)   429    429              85    85           
 Price risk management assets:                        
  Energy commodities   1,417    2  $ 1,330  $ 85    1,188    3  $ 1,123  $ 62 
 Total price risk management assets   1,417    2    1,330    85    1,188    3    1,123    62 
 NDT funds:                        
  Cash and cash equivalents   13    13              14    14           
  Equity securities                                        
   U.S. large-cap   556    415    141         547    409    138      
   U.S. mid/small-cap   83    34    49         81    33    48      
  Debt securities                                        
   U.S. Treasury   95    95              95    95           
   U.S. government sponsored agency   6         6         6         6      
   Municipality   80         80         77         77      
   Investment-grade corporate   41         41         38         38      
   Other   4         4         5         5      
  Receivables (payables), net   1    (1)   2         1    (1)   2      
 Total NDT funds   879    556    323         864    550    314      
 Auction rate securities (b)   13              13    16              16 
Total assets $ 3,179  $ 1,428  $ 1,653  $ 98  $ 2,392  $ 877  $ 1,437  $ 78 
                            

66



     March 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
     Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Liabilities                        
 Price risk management liabilities:                        
  Energy commodities $ 1,527  $ 1  $ 1,458  $ 68  $ 1,070  $ 4  $ 1,028  $ 38 
 Total price risk management liabilities $ 1,527  $ 1  $ 1,458  $ 68  $ 1,070  $ 4  $ 1,028  $ 38 
                            
PPL Electric                        
Assets                        
 Cash and cash equivalents $ 42  $ 42            $ 25  $ 25           
 Restricted cash and cash equivalents (c)   1    1              12    12           
Total assets $ 43  $ 43            $ 37  $ 37           

LKE                        
Assets                        
 Cash and cash equivalents $ 30  $ 30            $ 35  $ 35           
 Restricted cash and cash equivalents (d)   21    21              22    22           
Total assets $ 51  $ 51            $ 57  $ 57           
                            
Liabilities                        
 Price risk management liabilities:                        
  Interest rate swaps $ 40       $ 40       $ 36       $ 36      
Total price risk management liabilities $ 40       $ 40       $ 36       $ 36      
                            
LG&E                        
Assets                        
 Cash and cash equivalents $ 9  $ 9            $ 8  $ 8           
 Restricted cash and cash equivalents (d)   21    21              22    22           
Total assets $ 30  $ 30            $ 30  $ 30           
                            
Liabilities                        
 Price risk management liabilities:                        
  Interest rate swaps $ 40       $ 40       $ 36       $ 36      
Total price risk management liabilities $ 40       $ 40       $ 36       $ 36      
                            
KU                        
Assets                        
 Cash and cash equivalents $ 21  $ 21            $ 21  $ 21           
Total assets $ 21  $ 21            $ 21  $ 21           

60

  March 31, 2015 December 31, 2014
  Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
KU                        
Assets                        
 Cash and cash equivalents $ 23 $ 23       $ 11 $ 11      
Total assets $ 23 $ 23       $ 11 $ 11      
                            
Liabilities                        
 Price risk management liabilities:                        
  Interest rate swaps $ 61    $ 61    $ 33    $ 33   
Total price risk management liabilities $ 61    $ 61    $ 33    $ 33   
                            

(a)Current portion is included in "Restricted cash and cash equivalents" and long-term portion is included in "Other noncurrent assets" on the Balance Sheets.
(b)Included in "Other investments" on the Balance Sheets.
(c)Current portion is included in "Other current assets" and long-term portion is included in "Other noncurrent assets" on the Balance Sheets.
(d)Included in "Other noncurrent assets" on the Balance Sheets. Represents cash collateral posted to offset the exposure with counterparties related to certain interest rate swaps under master netting arrangements that are not offset.

A reconciliation of net assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 for the three months ended March 31 is as follows:
                             
      Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
      2014  2013 
      Energy Auction Cross-    Energy Auction Cross-   
      Commodities, Rate Currency    Commodities,  Rate Currency   
       net Securities Swaps Total  net Securities Swaps Total
PPL                        
Balance at beginning of                        
 period $ 24  $ 19       $ 43  $ 22  $ 16  $ 1  $ 39 
  Total realized/unrealized                        
   gains (losses)                        
    Included in earnings   (135)             (135)   (8)             (8)
    Included in OCI (a)           $ (1)   (1)             3    3 
  Sales        (3)        (3)                    
  Settlements   128              128    (1)             (1)
  Transfers into Level 3                     1              1 
  Transfers out of Level 3             1    1              (4)   (4)
Balance at end of period $ 17  $ 16  $    $ 33  $ 14  $ 16  $    $30 
                             

67



      Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
      2014  2013 
      Energy Auction Cross-    Energy Auction Cross-   
      Commodities, Rate Currency    Commodities,  Rate Currency   
       net Securities Swaps Total  net Securities Swaps Total
PPL Energy Supply                        
Balance at beginning of                        
 period $ 24  $ 16     $ 40  $ 22  $ 13     $ 35 
  Total realized/unrealized                        
   gains (losses)                        
    Included in earnings   (135)           (135)   (8)           (8)
  Sales        (3)      (3)                  
  Settlements   128            128    (1)           (1)
  Transfers into Level 3                     1            1 
Balance at end of period $ 17  $ 13       $ 30  $ 14  $ 13       $ 27 

A reconciliation of net assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 for the three months ended March 31 is as follows:
                             
      Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
      2015 2014
      Energy Auction Cross-    Energy Auction Cross-   
      Commodities, Rate Currency    Commodities,  Rate Currency   
       net Securities Swaps Total  net Securities Swaps Total
PPL                        
Balance at beginning of                        
 period $ 111 $ 10 $ 1 $ 122 $ 24 $ 19    $ 43
  Total realized/unrealized                        
   gains (losses)                        
    Included in earnings  (17)         (17)  (135)        (135)
    Included in OCI (a)         6   6       $(1)  (1)
  Sales                 (3)     (3)
  Settlements   30         30   128         128
  Transfers into Level 3   4         4            
  Transfers out of Level 3   1     (7)   (6)         1   1
Balance at end of period $ 129 $ 10 $  $ 139 $ 17 $ 16 $  $ 33

(a)"Energy Commodities, net" and "Cross-Currency Swaps" are included in "Qualifying derivatives" and "Auction Rate Securities" are included in "Available-for-sale securities" on the Statements of Comprehensive Income.

The significant unobservable inputs used in and quantitative information about the fair value measurement of assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 are as follows:


    March 31, 20142015
    Fair Value, net     Range
    Asset Valuation Unobservable (Weighted
    (Liability) Technique Input(s) Average) (a)
PPL
Energy commodities
Natural gas contracts (b)$ 13 Discounted cash flow Proprietary model used to calculate forward prices 11% - 100% (73%)
Power sales contracts (c) (43)Discounted cash flow Proprietary model used to calculate forward prices 11% - 100% (83%)
FTR purchase contracts (d) 3 Discounted cash flow Historical settled prices used to model forward prices  100% (100%)
Heat rate options (e) 44 Discounted cash flow Proprietary model used to calculate forward prices 23% - 59% (44%)
Auction rate securities (f) 16 Discounted cash flowModeled from SIFMA Index61% - 78% (70%)
PPL Energy Supply            
Energy commodities            
 Natural gas contracts (b) $ 13 49 Discounted cash flow Proprietary model used to calculate forward prices 11% - 100% (73%(43%)
 Power sales contracts (c)   (43)1 Discounted cash flow Proprietary model used to calculate forward prices 11%10% - 100% (83%)
FTR purchase contracts (d) 3 Discounted cash flow Historical settled prices used to model forward prices  100% (100%(82%)
 Heat rate options (e)   44 79 Discounted cash flow Proprietary model used to calculate forward prices 23%22% - 59% (44%44% (40%)
           
Auction rate securities (f)   13 Discounted cash flow Modeled from SIFMA Index63% - 78% (71%)


68



December 31, 2013
Fair Value, netRange
AssetValuationUnobservable(Weighted
(Liability)TechniqueInput(s)Average) (a)
PPL
Energy commodities
Natural gas contracts (b)$ 36 Discounted cash flow Proprietary model used to calculate forward prices 10% - 100% (86%)
Power sales contracts (c) (12)Discounted cash flow Proprietary model used to calculate forward prices 100% (100%)
Auction rate securities (f) 19 10 Discounted cash flow Modeled from SIFMA Index 10%41% - 80% (63%69% (53%)
              
61

December 31, 2014
Fair Value, netRange
AssetValuationUnobservable(Weighted
(Liability)TechniqueInput(s)Average) (a)
PPL Energy Supply            
Energy commodities            
 Natural gas contracts (b) $ 36 59 Discounted cash flow Proprietary model used to calculate forward prices 10%11% - 100% (86%(52%)
 Power sales contracts (c)   (12)(1) Discounted cash flow Proprietary model used to calculate forward prices 10% - 100% (59%)
FTR purchase contracts (d) 3Discounted cash flowHistorical settled prices used to model forward prices100% (100%)
Heat rate options (e) 50Discounted cash flowProprietary model used to calculate forward prices23% - 51% (45%)
           
Auction rate securities (f)   16 10 Discounted cash flow Modeled from SIFMA Index 10%44% - 80%69% (63%)
Cross-currency swaps (g) 1Discounted cash flowCredit valuation adjustment 15% (15%)

(a)For energy commodities and auction rate securities, the range and weighted average represent the percentage of fair value derived from the unobservable inputs. For cross-currency swaps, the range and weighted average represent the percentage change in fair value due to the unobservable inputs used in the model to calculate the credit valuation adjustment.
(b)As the forward price of natural gas increases/(decreases), the fair value of purchase contracts increases/(decreases). As the forward price of natural gas increases/(decreases), the fair value of sales contracts (decreases)/increases.
(c)As forward market prices increase/(decrease), the fair value of contracts (decreases)/increases. As volumetric assumptions for contracts in a gain position increase/(decrease), the fair value of contracts increases/(decreases). As volumetric assumptions for contracts in a loss position increase/(decrease), the fair value of the contracts (decreases)/increases.
(d)As the forward implied spread increases/(decreases), the fair value of the contracts increases/(decreases).
(e)The proprietary model used to calculate fair value incorporates market heat rates, correlations and volatilities. As the market implied heat rate increases/(decreases), the fair value of the contracts increases/(decreases).
(f)The model used to calculate fair value incorporates an assumption that the auctions will continue to fail. As the modeled forward rates of the SIFMA Index increase/(decrease), the fair value of the securities increases/(decreases).

(g)The credit valuation adjustment incorporates projected probabilities of default and estimated recovery rates. As the credit valuation adjustment increases/(decreases), the fair value of the swaps (decreases)/increases.

Net gains and losses on assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 and included in earnings for the periodsthree months ended March 31 are reported in the Statements of Income as follows:


   Three Months
                    
   Energy Commodities, net
   Unregulated  Unregulated  Energy 
   Wholesale Energy  Retail Energy  Purchases 
   2014  2013  2014  2013  2014  2013 
PPL and PPL Energy Supply                  
Total gains (losses) included in earnings $ (89) $ (2) $ (63) $ (7) $ 17  $ 1 
Change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to                  
  positions still held at the reporting date   (13)   (2)   (33)   (7)   1    1 

  Energy Commodities, net
  Unregulated Unregulated Energy
  Wholesale Energy Retail Energy Purchases
  2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014
PPL                 
Total gains (losses) included in earnings$ 21 $ (89) $ (40) $ (63) $ 2 $ 17
Change in unrealized gains (losses) relating                 
 to positions still held at the reporting date  25   (13)   (9)   (33)   1   1

Price Risk Management Assets/Liabilities - Energy Commodities(PPL and PPL Energy Supply)PPL)


Energy commodity contracts are generally valued using the income approach, except for exchange-traded derivative contracts, which are valued using the market approach and are classified as Level 1. Level 2 contracts are valued using inputs which may include quotes obtained from an exchange (where there is insufficient market liquidity to warrant inclusion in Level 1), binding and non-binding broker quotes, prices posted by ISOs or published tariff rates. Furthermore, independent quotes are obtained from the market to validate the forward price curves. Energy commodity contracts include forwards, futures, swaps, options and structured transactions and may be offset with similar positions in exchange-traded markets. To the extent possible, fair value measurements utilize various inputs that include quoted prices for similar contracts or market-corroborated inputs. In certain instances, these contracts may be valued using models, including standard option valuation models and other standard industry models. When the lowest level inputs that are significant to the fair value measurement of a contract are observable, the contract is classified as Level 2.


When unobservable inputs are significant to the fair value measurement, a contract is classified as Level 3. Level 3 contracts are valued using PPL proprietary models which may include significant unobservable inputs such as delivery at a location where pricing is unobservable, delivery dates that are beyond the dates for which independent quotes are available, volumetric assumptions, implied volatilities, implied correlations, and market implied heat rates. Forward transactions, including forward transactions classified as Level 3, are analyzed by PPL's Risk Management department, which reports to


69


the Chief Financial Officer (CFO).department. Accounting personnel who also report to the CFO, interpret the analysis quarterly to appropriately classify the forward transactions in the fair value hierarchy.

62

Valuation techniques are evaluated periodically. Additionally, Level 2 and Level 3 fair value measurements include adjustments for credit risk based on PPL's own creditworthiness (for net liabilities) and its counterparties' creditworthiness (for net assets). PPL's credit department assesses all reasonably available market information which is used by accounting personnel to calculate the credit valuation adjustment.


In certain instances, energy commodity contracts are transferred between Level 2 and Level 3. The primary reasons for the transfers during 20132015 were changes in the availability of market information and changes in the significance of the unobservable inputs utilized in the valuation of the contract.  As the delivery period of a contract becomes closer, market information may become available.  When this occurs, the model's unobservable inputs are replaced with observable market information.


contracts.

Price Risk Management Assets/Liabilities - Interest Rate Swaps/Foreign Currency Contracts/Cross-Currency Swaps (PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)


To manage interest rate risk, PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU use interest rate contracts such as forward-starting swaps, floating-to-fixed swaps and fixed-to-floating swaps. To manage foreign currency exchange risk, PPL uses foreign currency contracts such as forwards, options and cross-currency swaps that contain characteristics of both interest rate and foreign currency contracts. An income approach is used to measure the fair value of these contracts, utilizing readily observable inputs, such as forward interest rates (e.g., LIBOR and government security rates) and forward foreign currency exchange rates (e.g., GBP), as well as inputs that may not be observable, such as credit valuation adjustments. In certain cases, market information cannot practicably be obtained to value credit risk and therefore internal models are relied upon. These models use projected probabilities of default and estimated recovery rates based on historical observances. When the credit valuation adjustment is significant to the overall valuation, the contracts are classified as Level 3. For PPL, the primary reason for the transfers between Level 2 and Level 3 during 20142015 and 20132014 was the change in the significance of the credit valuation adjustment. Cross-currency swaps classified as Level 3 are valued by PPL's Treasury department, which reports to the CFO.department. Accounting personnel who also report to the CFO, interpret analysis quarterly to classify the contracts in the fair value hierarchy. Valuation techniques are evaluated periodically.


(PPL and PPL Energy Supply)

(PPL)

NDT Funds


The market approach is used to measure the fair value of equity securities held in the NDTtheNDT funds.


·The fair value measurements of equity securities classified as Level 1 are based on quoted prices in active markets.

·The fair value measurements of investments in commingled equity funds are classified as Level 2. These fair value measurements are based on firm quotes of net asset values per share, which are not obtained from a quoted price in an active market.

The fair value of debt securities is generally measured using a market approach, including the use of pricing models which incorporate observable inputs. Common inputs include benchmark yields, reported trades,relevant trade data, broker/dealer bid/ask prices, benchmark securities and credit valuation adjustments. When necessary, the fair value of debt securities is measured using the income approach, which incorporates similar observable inputs as well as monthly payment data, future predicted cash flows, collateral performance and new issue data.


Auction Rate Securities


Auction rate securities include Federal Family Education Loan Program guaranteed student loan revenue bonds, as well as various municipal bond issues. The probability of realizing losses on these securities is not significant.


The fair value of auction rate securities is estimated using an income approach that includes readily observable inputs, such as principal payments and discount curves for bonds with credit ratings and maturities similar to the securities, and unobservable inputs, such as future interest rates that are estimated based on the SIFMA Index, creditworthiness, and liquidity assumptions driven by the impact of auction failures. When the present value of future interest payments is significant to the overall valuation, the auction rate securities are classified as Level 3.


70


Auction rate securities are valued by PPL's Treasury department, which reports to the CFO.department. Accounting personnel who also report to the CFO, interpret the analysis quarterly to classify the contracts in the fair value hierarchy. Valuation techniques are evaluated periodically.

63

Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements(PPL)(PPL and PPL Energy Supply)


The following nonrecurring fair value measurement occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2014, resulting in an asset impairment:


    Carrying Fair Value Measurement Using   
   Amount (a) Level 3 Loss (b)
PPL and PPL Energy Supply         
Kerr Dam Project $ 47  $ 29  $ 18 

    Carrying Fair Value Measurements Using   
   Amount (a) Level 3 Loss (b)
PPL         
Kerr Dam Project $ 47 $ 29 $ 18

(a)Represents carrying value before fair value measurement.
(b)The loss on the Kerr Dam Project was recorded in the Supply segment and included in "Other operation and maintenance""Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations (net of income taxes)" on PPL's and PPL Energy Supply'sthe 2014 Statement of Income.

The significant unobservable inputs used in and the quantitative information about the nonrecurring fair value measurement of assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 are as follows:
    
   Fair Value, net   Significant Range
   Asset Valuation Unobservable (Weighted
   (Liability) Technique Input(s) Average)(a)
Kerr Dam Project           
 March 31, 2014$29 Discounted cash flow Proprietary model used to calculate plant value 38% (38%)

The significant unobservable inputs used in and the quantitative information about the nonrecurring fair value measurement of assets and liabilities classified as Level 3  are as follows:
Fair Value, netSignificantRange
AssetValuationUnobservable(Weighted
(Liability)TechniqueInput(s)Average)(a)
PPL and PPL Energy Supply
Kerr Dam Project
March 31, 2014$29 Discounted cash flowProprietary model used to calculate plant value38%  (38%)

(a)The range and weighted average represent the percentage of fair value derived from the unobservable inputs.

Kerr Dam Project


As disclosed in Note 11 in PPL's and PPL Energy Supply's 2013 Form 10-K,

PPL Montana holdspreviously held a joint operating license issued for the Kerr Dam Project. The license extends until 2035 and, between 2015 and 2025, the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Nation (the Tribes) have the option to purchase, hold and operate the Kerr Dam Project. The parties submitted the issue of the appropriate amount of the conveyance price to arbitration in February 2013. In March 2014, the arbitration panel issued its final decision holding that the conveyance price payable by the Tribes to PPL Montanafor the Kerr Dam Project is $18 million. As a result of the decision, PPL Energy Supply performed a recoverability test on the Kerr Dam Project and recorded an impairment charge. PPL Energy Supply performed an internal analysis using an income approach based on discounted cash flows (a PPL proprietary PPL model) to assess the fair value of the Kerr Dam Project.  Assumptions used in the PPL proprietary model were the conveyance price, forward energy price curves, forecasted generation, and forecasted operation and maintenance expenditures that were consistent with assumptions used in the business planning process and a market participant discount rate. Through this analysis, PPL Energy Supply determined the fair value of the Kerr Dam Project to be $29 million.


million at March 31, 2014. The Kerr Dam Project was included in the sale of the Montana Hydroelectric facilities and the assets were removed from the Balance Sheet. See Note 8 for additional information.

The assets were valued by the PPL Energy Supply Financial Department, which reports to the President of PPL Energy Supply.Department.  Accounting personnel who report to the CFO interpreted the analysis to appropriately classify the assets in the fair value hierarchy.


Financial Instruments Not Recorded at Fair Value(All Registrants)


The carrying amounts of contract adjustment payments related to the 2011 Purchase Contract component of the 2011 Equity Units and long-term debt on the Balance Sheets and their estimated fair values are set forth below. The fair values of these instruments were estimated using an income approach by discounting future cash flows at estimated current cost of funding rates, which incorporate the credit risk of the Registrants. These instruments areLong-term debt is classified as Level 2. The effect of third-party credit enhancements is not included in the fair value measurement.


71



   March 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
   Carrying    Carrying   
   Amount Fair Value Amount Fair Value
PPL            
 Contract adjustment payments (a) $ 11  $ 11  $ 21  $ 22 
 Long-term debt   20,818    22,350    20,907    22,177 
PPL Energy Supply            
 Long-term debt   2,524    2,680    2,525    2,658 
PPL Electric            
 Long-term debt   2,306    2,555    2,315    2,483 
LKE            
 Long-term debt   4,565    4,807    4,565    4,672 
LG&E            
 Long-term debt   1,353    1,413    1,353    1,372 
KU            
 Long-term debt   2,091    2,238    2,091    2,155 

(a)Included in "Other current liabilities" on the Balance Sheets.

   March 31, 2015 December 31, 2014
   Carrying    Carrying   
   Amount Fair Value Amount Fair Value
              
PPL $ 20,307 $ 23,258 $ 20,391 $ 22,670
PPL Electric   2,603   3,084   2,602   2,990
              
LKE   4,567   5,091   4,567   4,946
LG&E   1,353   1,493   1,353   1,455
KU   2,091   2,396   2,091   2,313

The carrying value of short-term debt (including notes between affiliates), when outstanding, approximates fair value due to the variable interest rates associated with the short-term debt and is classified as Level 2.

64

Credit Concentration Associated with Financial Instruments


(All Registrants)


Contracts are entered into with many entities for the purchase and sale of energy. When NPNS is elected, the fair value of these contracts is not reflected in the financial statements. However, the fair value of these contracts is considered when committing to new business from a credit perspective. See Note 14 for information on credit policies used to manage credit risk, including master netting arrangements and collateral requirements.


(PPL and PPL Energy Supply)

(PPL)

At March 31, 2014,2015, PPL and PPL Energy Supply had credit exposure of $997$692 million from energy trading partners, excluding exposure from related parties (PPL Energy Supply only) and the effects of netting arrangements, reserves and collateral. As a result of netting arrangements, reserves and collateral, PPL's credit exposure was reduced to $372 million and PPL Energy Supply's credit exposure was reduced to $371$402 million. The top ten counterparties including their affiliates accounted for $212$220 million, or 57%55%, of these exposures. NineEight of these counterparties had an investment grade credit rating from S&P or Moody's and accounted for 94%75% of the top ten exposures. The remaining counterparty has not beencounterparties are rated by S&P or Moody's,below investment grade, but isare current on itstheir obligations.  See Note 11 for information regarding PPL Energy Supply's related party credit exposure.

(PPL Electric)


PPL Electric is exposed to credit risk under energy supply contracts (including its supply contracts with PPL EnergyPlus); however, its PUC-approved recovery mechanism is anticipated to substantially eliminatemitigate this exposure.


(LKE, LG&E and KU)


At March 31, 2014,2015, LKE's, LG&E's and KU's credit exposure was not significant.


14. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities


Risk Management Objectives


(All Registrants)


PPL has a risk management policy approved by the Board of Directors to manage market risk associated with commodities, interest rates on debt issuances and foreign exchange (including price, liquidity and volumetric risk) and credit risk (including non-performance risk and payment default risk). The RMC, comprised of senior management and chaired by the Chief Risk Officer, oversees the risk management function. Key risk control activities designed to ensure compliance with the risk policy and detailed programs include, but are not limited to, credit review and approval, validation of transactions and market


72


prices, verification of risk and transaction limits, VaR analyses, portfolio stress tests, gross margin at risk analyses, sensitivity analyses and daily portfolio reporting, including open positions, determinations of fair value, and other risk management metrics.

Market Risk


Market risk includes the potential loss that may be incurred as a result of price changes associated with a particular financial or commodity instrument as well as market liquidity and volumetric risks. Forward contracts, futures contracts, options, swaps and structured transactions are utilized as part of risk management strategies to minimize unanticipated fluctuations in earnings caused by changes in commodity prices, volumes of full-requirement sales contracts, basis exposure, interest rates and/orand foreign currency exchange rates. Many of the contracts meet the definition of a derivative. All derivatives are recognized on the Balance Sheets at their fair value, unless NPNS is elected.


The table below summarizes the market risks that affect PPL and its Subsidiary Registrants.


   PPL PPL Electric PPLLKE LG&E KU
PPLEnergy SupplyElectricLKELG&EKU
Commodity price risk (including basis and                 
Commodity price risk (including basis and volumetric risk)X X M M M M
Interest rate risk:               
 Debt issuancesX X M M M M
 Defined benefit plans X XM M M M
 NDT securitiesX X        
Equity securities price risk:               
 Defined benefit plansX X M M M M
 NDT securitiesX X        
 Future stock transactions X        
Foreign currency risk - WPD investment and
earnings X        
65
 

X= PPL and PPL Energy Supply actively mitigatemitigates market risks through theirits risk management programs described above.
M= The regulatory environments for PPL's regulated entities, by definition, significantly mitigate market risk.

Commodity price risk


·PPL is exposed to commodity price risk through its domestic subsidiaries as described below. VolumetricWPD is exposed to volumetric risk which is significantly mitigated at WPD as a result of the method of regulation in the U.K.

·PPL Energy Supply is exposed to commodity price risk for energy and energy-related products associated with the sale of electricity from its generating assets and other electricity and gas marketing activities and the purchase of fuel and fuel-related commodities for generating assets, as well as for proprietary trading activities.

·PPL Electric is exposed to commodity price risk from its obligation as PLR; however, its PUC-approved cost recovery mechanism substantially eliminates its exposure to this risk. PPL Electric also mitigates its exposure to volumetric risk by entering into full-requirement supply agreements to serve its PLR customers. These supply agreements transfer the volumetric risk associated with the PLR obligation to the energy suppliers.

·LG&E's and KU's rates include certain mechanisms for fuel gas supply and environmental expenses. In addition, LG&E's rates include certain mechanisms for gas supply. These mechanisms generally provide for timely recovery of market price and volumetric fluctuations associated with these expenses.

Interest rate risk


·PPL and its subsidiaries are exposed to interest rate risk associated with forecasted fixed-rate and existing floating-rate debt issuances. WPD holds over-the-counter cross currency swaps to limit exposure to market fluctuations on interest and principal payments from changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. LG&E utilizes over-the-counter interest rate swaps to limit exposure to market fluctuations on floating-rate debt, and LG&E and KU utilize forward starting interest rate swaps to hedge changes in benchmark interest rates, when appropriate, in connection with future debt issuances.  This risk for PPL Electric, LG&E and KU is significantly mitigated due to recovery mechanisms in place.

·PPL and its subsidiaries are exposed to interest rate risk associated with debt securities held by defined benefit plans. This risk is significantly mitigated to the extent that the plans are sponsored at, or sponsored on behalf of, the regulated domestic utilities and for certain plans at WPD due to the recovery mechanisms in place. Additionally, PPL Energy Supply is exposed to interest rate risk associated with debt securities held by the NDT.

73



Equity securities price risk


·PPL and its subsidiaries are exposed to equity securities price risk associated with defined benefit plans. This risk is significantly mitigated at the regulated domestic utilities and for certain plans at WPD due to the recovery mechanisms in place. Additionally, PPL Energy Supply is exposed to equity securities price risk in the NDT funds.

·PPL is exposed to equity securities price risk from future stock sales and/or purchases.

Foreign currency risk


·PPL is exposed to foreign currency exchange risk primarily associated with its investments in and earnings inof U.K. affiliates.

Credit Risk


Credit risk is the potential loss that may be incurred due to a counterparty's non-performance.


PPL is exposed to credit risk from "in-the-money" interest rate and foreign currency derivatives with financial institutions, as well as additional credit risk through certain of its subsidiaries, as discussed below.


PPL Energy Supply is exposed to credit risk from "in-the-money" commodity derivatives with its energy trading partners, which include other energy companies, fuel suppliers, financial institutions, other wholesale customers and retail customers.

66

The majority of PPL and PPL Energy Supply'sPPL's credit risk stems from commodity derivatives for multi-year contracts for energy sales and purchases.purchases entered into by PPL Energy Supply. If PPL Energy Supply's counterparties fail to perform their obligations under such contracts and PPL Energy Supply could not replace the sales or purchases at the same or better prices as those under the defaulted contracts, PPL Energy Supply would incur financial losses. Those losses would be recognized immediately or through lower revenues or higher costs in future years, depending on the accounting treatment for the defaulted contracts. In the event a supplier of LKE (through its subsidiaries LG&E and KU) or PPL Electric defaults on its obligation, those entities would be required to seek replacement power or replacement fuel in the market. In general, subject to regulatory review or other processes, appropriate incremental costs incurred by these entities would be recoverable from customers in future rates,through applicable rate mechanisms, thus mitigating the financial risk for these entities.


PPL and its subsidiaries have credit policies in place to manage credit risk, including the use of an established credit approval process, daily monitoring of counterparty positions and the use of master netting agreements or provisions. These agreements generally include credit mitigation provisions, such as margin, prepayment or collateral requirements. PPL and its subsidiaries may request additional credit assurance, in certain circumstances, in the event that the counterparties' credit ratings fall below investment grade, their tangible net worth falls below specified percentages or their exposures exceed an established credit limit. See Note 13 for credit concentration associated with energy trading partners.


Master Netting Arrangements


Net derivative positions on the balance sheets are not offset against the right to reclaim cash collateral (a receivable) or the obligation to return cash collateral (a payable) under master netting arrangements.


PPL's and PPL Energy Supply's obligation to return counterparty cash collateral under master netting arrangements was $10 million and $9$11 million at March 31, 20142015 and December 31, 2013.


2014.

PPL Electric, LKE and LG&E had no obligation to return cash collateral under master netting arrangements at March 31, 20142015 and December 31, 2013.


2014.

PPL, LKE and LG&E had posted $22 million and $21 million of cash collateral under master netting arrangements of $21 million and $22 million at March 31, 20142015 and December 31, 2013.


PPL Energy Supply, 2014.

PPL Electric and KU haddid not postedpost any cash collateral under master netting arrangements at March 31, 20142015 and December 31, 2013.


2014.

See "Offsetting Derivative Investments" below for a summary of derivative positions presented in the balance sheets where a right of setoff exists under these arrangements.



74


(PPL and PPL Energy Supply)

(PPL)

Commodity Price Risk (Non-trading)


Commodity price risk, including basis and volumetric risk, is among PPL's and PPL Energy Supply's most significant risks due to the level of investment that PPL and PPL Energy Supply maintainmaintains in theirits competitive generation assets, as well as the extent of theirits marketing activities. Several factors influence price levels and volatilities. These factors include, but are not limited to, seasonal changes in demand, weather conditions, available generating assets within regions, transportation/transmission availability and reliability within and between regions, market liquidity, and the nature and extent of current and potential federal and state regulations.


PPL Energy Supply maximizes the value of its unregulated wholesale and unregulated retail energy portfolios through the use of non-trading strategies that include sales of competitive baseload generation, optimization of competitive intermediate and peaking generation and marketing activities.


PPL Energy Supply has a formal hedging program to economically hedge the forecasted purchase and sale of electricity and related fuels for its competitive baseload generation fleet, which includes 7,3696,496 MW (summer rating) of nuclear, coal and hydroelectric generating capacity. PPL Energy Supply attempts to optimize the overall value of its competitive intermediate and peaking fleet, which includes 3,3093,252 MW (summer rating) of natural gas and oil-fired generation. PPL Energy Supply's marketing portfolio is comprised of full-requirement sales contracts and related supply contracts, retail natural gas and electricity sales contracts and other marketing activities. The strategies that PPL Energy Supply uses to hedge its full-requirement sales contracts include purchasing energy (at a liquid trading hub or directly at the load delivery zone), capacity and RECs in the market and/or supplying the energy, capacity and RECs from its generation assets.

67

PPL and

PPL Energy Supply enterenters into financial and physical derivative contracts, including forwards, futures, swaps and options, to hedge the price risk associated with electricity, natural gas, oil and other commodities. Certain contracts are non-derivatives or NPNS is elected and therefore they are not reflected in the financial statements until delivery. PPL and PPL Energy Supply segregate theirsegregates its non-trading activities into two categories: cash flow hedges and economic activity as discussed below.


Cash Flow Hedges


Certain derivative contracts have qualified for hedge accounting so that the effective portion of a derivative's gain or loss is deferred in AOCI and reclassified into earnings when the forecasted transaction occurs. ThereIn 2015 and 2014, there were no active cash flow hedges during the three months ended March 31, 2014.and there was no hedge ineffectiveness associated with energy derivatives. At March 31, 2014,2015, the accumulated net unrecognized after-tax gains (losses) that are expected to be reclassified into earnings during the next 12 months were $24 million for PPL and PPL Energy Supply.$18 million. Cash flow hedges are discontinued if it is no longer probable that the original forecasted transaction will occur by the end of the originally specified time periods and any amounts previously recorded in AOCI are reclassified into earnings once it is determined that the hedge transaction is probable of not occurring.  Thereoccurring.There were no such reclassifications for the three months ended March 31, 20142015 and 2013.


For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, there was no hedge ineffectiveness associated with energy derivatives.

2014.

Economic Activity


Many derivative contracts economically hedge the commodity price risk associated with electricity, natural gas, oil and other commodities but do not receive hedge accounting treatment because they were not eligible for hedge accounting or because hedge accounting was not elected. These derivatives hedge a portion of the economic value of PPL Energy Supply's competitive generation assets and unregulated full-requirement and retail contracts, which are subject to changes in fair value due to market price volatility and volume expectations. Additionally, economic activity also includes the ineffective portion of qualifying cash flow hedges (see "Cash Flow Hedges" above).  The derivative contracts in this category that existed at March 31, 20142015 range in maturity through 2019.


2020.

Examples of economic activity may include hedges on sales of baseload generation, certain purchase contracts used to supply full-requirement sales contracts, FTRs or basis swaps used to hedge basis risk associated with the sale of competitive generation or supplying full-requirement sales contracts, Spark Spread hedging contracts, retail electric and natural gas activities, and fuel oil swaps used to hedge price escalation clauses in coal transportation and other fuel-related contracts. PPL Energy Supply also uses options, which include the sale of call options and the purchase of put options tied to a particular generating unit. Since the physical generating capacity is owned, price exposure is generally capped at the price at


75


which the generating unit would be dispatched and therefore does not expose PPL Energy Supply to uncovered market price risk.

The unrealized gains (losses) for economic activity for the periods ended March 31 were as follows.


     Three Months
       2014  2013 
Operating Revenues            
 Unregulated wholesale energy       $ (789) $ (822)
 Unregulated retail energy         (26)   (8)
Operating Expenses              
 Fuel         (1)   (1)
 Energy purchases         580    634 

         Three Months
       2015 2014
Operating Revenues            
 Unregulated wholesale energy       $ (92) $ (789)
 Unregulated retail energy         (13)   (26)
Operating Expenses            
 Fuel            (1)
 Energy purchases         145   580

Commodity Price Risk (Trading)


PPL Energy Supply has a proprietary trading strategy which is utilized to take advantage of market opportunities.opportunities primarily in its geographic footprint. As a result, PPL Energy Supply may at times create a net open position in its portfolio that could result in losses if prices do not move in the manner or direction anticipated. Net energy trading margins, which are included in "Unregulated wholesale energy" on the Statements of Income, were insignificant for the three months ended March 31, 20142015 and 2013.


2014.

Commodity Volumes


At March 31, 2014,2015, the net volumes of derivative (sales)/purchase contracts used in support of the various strategies discussed above were as follows.


    Volumes (a)
Commodity Unit of Measure 2014 (b) 2015  2016  Thereafter
           
Power MWh  (27,112,584)  (28,794,377)  3,496,447   14,130,735 
Capacity MW-Month  (14,918)  (5,120)  501   9 
Gas MMBtu  63,248,020   14,120,116   57,884,707   25,814,197 
Coal Tons  25,000       
FTRs MW-Month  4,734   1,705     
Oil Barrels  156,000   436,233   331,258   279,060 

68

    Volumes (a)
Commodity Unit of Measure 2015 (b) 2016 2017 Thereafter
           
Power MWh  (30,874,062)  (8,521,382)  (248,329)  2,236,333
Capacity MW-Month  (3,998)  (878)  6  3
Gas MMBtu  157,995,389  87,545,701  13,742,416  20,314,625
FTRs MW-Month  532      
Oil Barrels  300,328  387,429  257,483  60,000

(a)Volumes for option contracts factor in the probability of an option being exercised and may be less than the notional amount of the option.
(b)Represents balance of the current year.

Interest Rate Risk


(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)


PPL and its subsidiaries issue debt to finance their operations, which exposes them to interest rate risk. Various financial derivative instruments are utilized to adjust the mix of fixed and floating interest rates in their debt portfolio, adjust the duration of the debt portfolio and lock in benchmark interest rates in anticipation of future financing, when appropriate. Risk limits under PPL's risk management program are designed to balance risk exposure to volatility in interest expense and changes in the fair value of the debt portfolio due to changes in benchmark interest rates.


Cash Flow Hedges


(PPL)


Interest rate risks include exposure to adverse interest rate movements for outstanding variable rate debt and for future anticipated financings. Financial interest rate swap contracts that qualify as cash flow hedges may be entered into to hedge floating interest rate risk associated with both existing and anticipated debt issuances. At March 31, 2014, outstanding2015, PPL held an aggregate notional value in interest rate swap contracts of $1.6 billion that range in maturity through 2025 for PPL's domestic2045. The amount outstanding includes swaps entered into by PPL on behalf of LG&E and KU. Realized gains and losses on the LG&E and KU swaps are probable of recovery through regulated rates; as such, any gains and losses on these derivatives are included in regulatory assets or liabilities and will be recognized in "Interest Expense" on the Statements of Income over the life of the underlying debt at the time the underlying hedged interest rate swaps.  These swaps hadexpense is recorded.

At March 31, 2015, PPL held an aggregate notional value of $500 million at March 31, 2014.


At March 31, 2014, PPL held a notional position in cross-currency interest rate swaps totalingswap contracts of $1.3 billion that range in maturity from 2016 through 2028 to hedge the interest payments and principal of WPD's U.S. dollar-denominated senior notes.

76


For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013,2015, PPL had no hedge ineffectiveness associated with interest rate derivatives was insignificant.


and an insignificant amount for the three months ended March 31, 2014.

Cash flow hedges are discontinued if it is no longer probable that the original forecasted transaction will occur by the end of the originally specified time period and any amounts previously recorded in AOCI are reclassified into earnings once it is determined that the hedged transaction is probable of not occurring.  PPLoccurring.PPL had no such reclassifications for the three months ended March 31, 2015 associated with discontinued cash flow hedges and an insignificant amount reclassified for the three months ended March 31, 2014 associated with discontinued cash flow hedges and no such reclassifications for the three months ended March 31, 2013.


2014.

At March 31, 2014,2015, the accumulated net unrecognized after-tax gains (losses) on qualifying derivatives that are expected to be reclassified into earnings during the next 12 months were $(12)$(13) million. In addition, see Note 8 for unamortized losses on PPL interest rate swaps expected to be reclassified into earnings and reflected in discontinued operations at the close of the spinoff transaction. Amounts are reclassified as the hedged interest paymentsexpense is recorded.

(LKE, LG&E and KU)

Periodically, LG&E and KU enter into forward-starting interest rate swaps with PPL that have terms identical to forward-starting swaps entered into by PPL with third parties. Realized gains and losses on all of these swaps are made.probable of recovery through regulated rates; as such, any gains and losses on these derivatives are included in regulatory assets or liabilities and will be recognized in "Interest Expense" on the Statements of Income over the life of the underlying debt at the time the underlying hedged interest expense is recorded. At March 31, 2015, the total notional amount of forward starting interest rate swaps outstanding was $1 billion (LG&E and KU each held contracts of $500 million). The swaps range in maturity through 2045.

69

Economic Activity(PPL, LKE and LG&E)


LG&E enters into interest rate swap contracts that economically hedge interest payments on variable rate debt. Because realized gains and losses from the swaps, including a terminated swap contract, are recoverable through regulated rates, any subsequent changes in fair value of these derivatives are included in regulatory assets or liabilities until they are realized as interest expense. Realized gains and losses are recognized in "Interest Expense" on the Statements of Income whenat the time the underlying hedged interest expense is recorded. At March 31, 2014,2015, LG&E held contracts with a notional amount of $179 million that range in maturity through 2033.


Foreign Currency Risk


(PPL)


PPL is exposed to foreign currency risk, primarily through investments in and earnings of U.K. affiliates. PPL has adopted a foreign currency risk management program designed to hedge certain foreign currency exposures, including firm commitments, recognized assets or liabilities, anticipated transactions and net investments. In addition, PPL enters into financial instruments to protect against foreign currency translation risk of expected GBP earnings.


Net Investment Hedges


PPL enters into foreign currency contracts on behalf of a subsidiary to protect the value of a portion of its net investment in WPD. The contracts outstanding at March 31, 20142015 had a notional amount of £345£217 million (approximately $549$355 million based on contracted rates). The settlement dates of these contracts range from May 20142015 through December 2015.


Additionally, a PPL Global subsidiary that has a U.S. dollar functional currency entered into GBP intercompany loans payable with PPL WEM subsidiaries that have GBP functional currency.  The loans qualify as a net investment hedge for the PPL Global subsidiary.  As such, the foreign currency gains and losses on the intercompany loans for the PPL Global subsidiary are recorded to the foreign currency translation adjustment component of OCI.  June 2016.

At March 31, 2014, the outstanding balances of the intercompany loans were £40 million (approximately $67 million based on spot rates).  For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, PPL recognized an insignificant amount and $5 million of net investment hedge gains (losses) on the intercompany loans in the foreign currency translation adjustment component of OCI.


At March 31, 2014,2015, PPL had $(5)$24 million of accumulated net investment hedge after-taxafter tax gains (losses) that were included in the foreign currency translation adjustment component of AOCI, compared to an insignificant amount$14 million at December 31, 2013.

2014.

Economic Activity


PPL enters into foreign currency contracts on behalf of a subsidiary to economically hedge GBP-denominated anticipated earnings. At March 31, 2014,2015, the total exposure hedged by PPL was approximately £1.8£1.3 billion (approximately $3.0$2.1 billion based on contracted rates). These contracts had termination dates ranging from April 20142015 through October 2016.



77


March 2017.

Accounting and Reporting


(All Registrants)


All derivative instruments are recorded at fair value on the Balance Sheet as an asset or liability unless NPNS is elected. NPNS contracts for PPL and PPL Energy Supply include certain full-requirement sales contracts, other physical purchase and sales contracts and certain retail energy and physical capacity contracts, and for PPL Electric include certain full-requirement purchase contracts and other physical purchase contracts. Changes in the fair value of derivatives not designated as NPNS are recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met and designated as such, except for the changes in fair values of LG&E's and KU's interest rate swaps that are recognized as regulatory assets.assets or regulatory liabilities. See Note 6 for amounts recorded in regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities at March 31, 20142015 and December 31, 2013.  PPL and2014. PPL Energy Supply havehas many physical and financial commodity purchases and sales contracts that economically hedge commodity price risk but do not receive hedge accounting treatment. As such, realized and unrealized gains (losses) on these contracts are recorded currently in earnings. Generally each contract is considered a unit of account and PPL and PPL Energy Supply presentpresents gains (losses) on physical and financial commodity sales contracts in "Unregulated wholesale energy" or "Unregulated retail energy" and (gains) losses on physical and financial commodity purchase contracts in "Fuel" or "Energy purchases" on the Statements of Income. Certain of the economic hedging strategies employed by PPL Energy Supply utilize a combination of financial purchases and sales contracts which are similarly reported gross as an expense and revenue, respectively, on thePPL's Statements of Income. PPL Energy Supply records realized hourly net sales or purchases of physical power with PJM in its Statements of Income as "Unregulated wholesale energy" if in a net sales position and "Energy purchases" if in a net purchase position.


See Notes 1 and 1917 in each Registrant's 20132014 Form 10-K for additional information on accounting policies related to derivative instruments.

70

(PPL)


The following table presents the fair value and location of derivative instruments recorded on the Balance Sheets.


       March 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
       Derivatives designated as Derivatives not designated Derivatives designated as Derivatives not designated
       hedging instruments as hedging instruments hedging instruments as hedging instruments
       Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities
Current:                        
 Price Risk Management                        
  Assets/Liabilities (a):                        
   Interest rate swaps (b) $ 7  $ 3      $ 4  $ 82          $ 4 
   Cross-currency swaps (b)       4              $ 4         
   Foreign currency                                
    contracts       18        62        16        55 
   Commodity contracts         $ 1,080    1,211          $ 860    750 
     Total current   7    25    1,080    1,277    82    20    860    809 
Noncurrent:                        
 Price Risk Management                        
  Assets/Liabilities (a):                        
   Interest rate swaps (b)   2    4        36    9            32 
   Cross-currency swaps (b)       51                28         
   Foreign currency                                
    contracts       6    5    37        4        31 
   Commodity contracts           337    316            328    320 
     Total noncurrent   2    61    342    389    9    32    328    383 
Total derivatives $ 9  $ 86  $ 1,422  $ 1,666  $ 91  $ 52  $ 1,188  $ 1,192 

       March 31, 2015 December 31, 2014
       Derivatives designated as Derivatives not designated Derivatives designated as Derivatives not designated
       hedging instruments as hedging instruments hedging instruments as hedging instruments
       Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities
Current:                        
 Price Risk Management                        
  Assets/Liabilities (a):                        
   Interest rate swaps (b)    $ 160    $ 5    $ 94    $ 5
   Cross-currency swaps (b) $ 1   2            3      
   Foreign currency                        
    contracts   24    $ 106   2 $ 12    $ 67   
   Commodity contracts         988   904         1,079   1,024
     Total current   25   162   1,094   911   12   97   1,146   1,029
Noncurrent:                        
 Price Risk Management                        
  Assets/Liabilities (a):                        
   Interest rate swaps (b)      23      47      14      43
   Cross-currency swaps (b)   48            29         
   Foreign currency                        
    contracts   10      69   4   5      46   2
   Commodity contracts         310   259         239   193
     Total noncurrent   58   23   379   310   34   14   285   238
Total derivatives $ 83 $ 185 $ 1,473 $ 1,221 $ 46 $ 111 $ 1,431 $ 1,267

(a)Represents the location on the Balance Sheets.
(b)Excludes accrued interest, if applicable.

The following tables present the pre-tax effect of derivative instruments recognized in income, OCI or regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities for the three months ended March 31.


              2015 2014
                 Gain (Loss)    Gain (Loss)
                 Recognized    Recognized
                 in Income    in Income
              on Derivative Gain (Loss) on Derivative
           Gain (Loss) (Ineffective Reclassified (Ineffective
        Location of Reclassified Portion and from AOCI Portion and
     Derivative Gain Gain (Loss) from AOCI Amount into Amount
     (Loss) Recognized in Recognized into Income Excluded from Income Excluded from
Derivative  OCI (Effective Portion)  in Income (Effective Effectiveness (Effective Effectiveness
Relationships 2015 2014 on Derivative Portion) Testing) Portion) Testing)
Cash Flow Hedges:                    
 Interest rate swaps $ (19) $ (46) Interest expense $ (4)    $ (5) $ 2
 Cross-currency swaps   21   (25) Interest expense   1         
           Other income            
            (expense) - net   17      (29)   
 Commodity contracts       Unregulated            
            wholesale energy   (2)      (1)   
           Energy purchases   8      7   
           Depreciation   1      1   
           Discontinued operations         2   
Total $ 2 $ (71)    $ 21    $ (25) $ 2
                         
Net Investment Hedges:                     
  Foreign currency contracts $ 16 $ (4)               
                        
78



              2014  2013 
                 Gain (Loss)    Gain (Loss)
                 Recognized    Recognized
                 in Income    in Income
              on Derivative   on Derivative
           Gain (Loss) (Ineffective Gain (Loss) (Ineffective
        Location of Reclassified Portion and Reclassified Portion and
     Derivative Gain Gain (Loss) from AOCI Amount from AOCI Amount
     (Loss) Recognized in Recognized into Income Excluded from into Income Excluded from
Derivative  OCI (Effective Portion)  in Income  (Effective Effectiveness (Effective Effectiveness
Relationships 2014  2013  on Derivative Portion) Testing) Portion) Testing)
Cash Flow Hedges:                    
 Interest rate swaps $ (46) $ 9  Interest expense $ (5) $ 2  $ (5)     
 Cross-currency swaps   (25)   73  Other income            
            (expense) - net   (29)        69      
 Commodity contracts           Unregulated            
            wholesale energy   1         67  $ 1 
           Energy purchases   7         (16)     
           Depreciation   1                
Total $ (71) $ 82     $ (25) $ 2  $ 115  $ 1 
                         
Net Investment Hedges:                     
  Foreign currency contracts $ (4) $ 16                

Derivatives Not Designated as Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in      
 Hedging Instruments  Income on Derivative 2014  2013 
         
Foreign currency contracts Other income (expense) - net $ (24) $ 119 
Interest rate swaps Interest expense   (2)   (2)
Commodity contracts Unregulated wholesale energy (a)   (3,044)   (706)
  Unregulated retail energy   (64)   (7)
  Fuel   (1)   1 
  Energy purchases (b)   2,364    586 
  Total $ (771) $ (9)
         
Derivatives Not Designated as Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized as      
 Hedging Instruments Regulatory Liabilities/Assets 2014  2013 
         
Interest rate swaps Regulatory assets - noncurrent $ (4) $ 4 
         
Derivatives Designated as Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized as      
 Cash Flow Hedges Regulatory Liabilities/Assets 2014  2013 
         
Interest rate swaps Regulatory liabilities - noncurrent      $ 10 

71

Derivatives Not Designated as Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in      
 Hedging Instruments  Income on Derivative 2015 2014
         
Foreign currency contracts Other income (expense) - net $ 88 $ (24)
Interest rate swaps Interest expense   (2)   (2)
Commodity contracts Unregulated wholesale energy (a)   (229)   (3,042)
  Unregulated retail energy   (39)   (64)
  Fuel   (3)   (1)
  Energy purchases (b)   196   2,364
  Discontinued operations      (2)
  Total $ 11 $ (771)
         
         
Derivatives Designated as Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized as      
 Hedging Instruments Regulatory Liabilities/Assets 2015 2014
         
Interest rate swaps Regulatory assets- noncurrent $ (56)   
         
Derivatives Not Designated as Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized as      
 Hedging Instruments Regulatory Liabilities/Assets 2015 2014
         
Interest rate swaps Regulatory assets - noncurrent $ (4) $ (4)

(a)2014 includes significant realized and unrealized losses on physical and financial commodity sales contracts due to the unusually cold weather.
(b)2014 includes significant realized and unrealized gains on physical and financial commodity purchase contracts due to the unusually cold weather.             

(PPL Energy Supply)

The following table presents the fair value and location of derivative instruments recorded on the Balance Sheets.

       March 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
       Derivatives not designated Derivatives not designated
       as hedging instruments as hedging instruments
       Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities
Current:            
 Price Risk Management            
  Assets/Liabilities (a):            
   Commodity contracts $ 1,080  $ 1,211  $ 860  $ 750 
     Total current   1,080    1,211    860    750 
Noncurrent:            
 Price Risk Management            
  Assets/Liabilities (a):            
   Commodity contracts   337    316    328    320 
     Total noncurrent   337    316    328    320 
Total derivatives $ 1,417  $ 1,527  $ 1,188  $ 1,070 

(a)Represents the location on the Balance Sheets.

79



The following tables present the pre-tax effect of derivative instruments recognized in income or OCI for the three months ended March 31.

             2014  2013 
                Gain (Loss)    Gain (Loss)
                 Recognized    Recognized
                in Income    in Income
                on Derivative    on Derivative
          Gain (Loss) (Ineffective Gain (Loss) (Ineffective
        Location of Reclassified Portion and Reclassified Portion and
     Derivative Gain  Gains (Losses) from AOCI Amount from AOCI Amount
     (Loss) Recognized in Recognized into Income Excluded from into Income Excluded from
Derivative OCI (Effective Portion)  in Income (Effective Effectiveness (Effective Effectiveness
Relationships 2014  2013  on Derivative  Portion)  Testing) Portion) Testing)
Cash Flow Hedges:                            
  Commodity contracts       Unregulated                    
                wholesale energy $ 1       $ 67  $ 1 
           Energy purchases   7         (16)     
           Depreciation   1                
Total              $ 9       $ 51  $ 1 
                         
                      
                        

Derivatives Not Designated as Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in      
 Hedging Instruments  Income on Derivatives 2014  2013 
         
Commodity contracts Unregulated wholesale energy (a) $ (3,044) $ (706)
  Unregulated retail energy   (64)   (7)
  Fuel   (1)   1 
  Energy purchases (b)   2,364    586 
  Total $ (745) $ (126)

(a)2014 includes significant realized and unrealized losses on physical and financial commodity sales contracts due to the unusually cold weather.
(b)2014 includes significant realized and unrealized gains on physical and financial commodity purchase contracts due to the unusually cold weather.

(LKE)


The following table presents the fair value and the location on the Balance Sheets of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges.

       March 31, 2015 December 31, 2014
       Assets Liabilities  Assets Liabilities
Current:             
 Price Risk Management             
  Assets/Liabilities (a):             
   Interest rate swaps    $ 122     $ 66

(a)Represents the location on the Balance Sheets.

The following table presents the pre-tax effect of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges that are recognized in regulatory liabilitiesassets for the three months ended March 31.


Derivatives Instruments Location of Gain (Loss) 2014  2013 
         
Interest rate swaps Regulatory liabilities - noncurrent    $ 10 

  Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in      
Derivative Instruments Regulatory Assets 2015 2014
         
Interest rate swaps Regulatory assets - noncurrent $ (56)   
         

(LG&E)


The following table presents the fair value and the location on the Balance Sheets of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges.

       March 31, 2015 December 31, 2014
       Assets Liabilities  Assets Liabilities
Current:             
 Price Risk Management             
  Assets/Liabilities (a):             
   Interest rate swaps    $ 61     $ 33

(a)Represents the location on the Balance Sheets.

The following table presents the pre-tax effect of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges that are recognized in regulatory liabilitiesassets for the three months ended March 31.

72

Derivative Instruments Location of Gain (Loss) 2014  2013 
         
Interest rate swaps Regulatory liabilities - noncurrent    $ 5 

  Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in      
Derivative Instruments Regulatory Assets 2015 2014
         
Interest rate swaps Regulatory assets - noncurrent $ (28)   

(KU)


The following table presents the fair value and the location on the Balance Sheets of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges.

       March 31, 2015 December 31, 2014
       Assets Liabilities  Assets Liabilities
Current:             
 Price Risk Management             
  Assets/Liabilities (a):             
   Interest rate swaps    $ 61     $ 33

(a)Represents the location on the Balance Sheets.

The following table presents the pre-tax effect of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges that are recognized in regulatory liabilitiesassets for the three months ended March 31.


Derivative Instruments Location of Gain (Loss) 2014  2013 
         
Interest rate swaps Regulatory liabilities - noncurrent    $ 5 


80


  Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in      
Derivative Instruments Regulatory Assets 2015 2014
         
Interest rate swaps Regulatory assets - noncurrent $ (28)   

(LKE and LG&E)


The following table presents the fair value and the location on the Balance Sheets of derivatives not designated as hedging instruments.


       March 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
       Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities
Current:            
 Price Risk Management            
  Assets/Liabilities (a):            
   Interest rate swaps    $ 4      $ 4 
     Total current       4        4 
Noncurrent:            
 Price Risk Management            
  Assets/Liabilities (a):            
   Interest rate swaps       36        32 
     Total noncurrent       36        32 
Total derivatives     $ 40      $ 36 

       March 31, 2015 December 31, 2014
       Assets Liabilities  Assets Liabilities
Current:             
 Price Risk Management             
  Assets/Liabilities (a):             
   Interest rate swaps    $ 5     $ 5
     Total current      5       5
Noncurrent:             
 Price Risk Management             
  Assets/Liabilities (a):             
   Interest rate swaps      47       43
     Total noncurrent      47       43
Total derivatives    $ 52     $ 48

(a)Represents the location on the Balance Sheets.

The following tables present the pre-tax effect of derivatives not designated as cash flow hedges that are recognized in income or regulatory assets for the three months ended March 31.


 Derivative Instruments Location of Gain (Loss) 2014  2013 
         
Interest rate swaps Interest expense $ (2) $ (2)
         
 Derivative Instruments Location of Gain (Loss) 2014  2013 
         
Interest rate swaps Regulatory assets - noncurrent $ (4) $ 4 

  Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in    
Derivative Instruments Income on Derivatives 2015 2014
         
Interest rate swaps Interest expense $ (2) $ (2)
         
  Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in    
Derivative Instruments Regulatory Assets 2015 2014
         
Interest rate swaps Regulatory assets - noncurrent $ (4) $ (4)

(All Registrants except PPL Electric and KU)


Electric)

Offsetting Derivative Instruments


PPL, PPL Energy Supply, LKE, LG&E and KU or certain of their subsidiaries have master netting arrangements or similar agreements in place including derivative clearing agreements with futures commission merchants (FCMs) to permit the trading of cleared

73

derivative products on one or more futures exchanges. The clearing arrangements permit ana FCM to use and apply any property in its possession as a set off to pay amounts or discharge obligations owed by a customer upon default of the customer and typically do not place any restrictions on the FCM's use of collateral posted by the customer. PPL, PPL Energy Supply, LKE, LG&E and KU and their subsidiaries also enter into agreements pursuant to which they trade certain energy and other products. Under the agreements, upon termination of the agreement as a result of a default or other termination event, the non-defaulting party typically would have a right to setoff amounts owed under the agreement against any other obligations arising between the two parties (whether under the agreement or not), whether matured or contingent and irrespective of the currency, place of payment or place of booking of the obligation.


PPL, PPL Energy Supply, LKE, LG&E and KU have elected not to offset derivative assets and liabilities and not to offset net derivative positions against the right to reclaim cash collateral pledged (an asset) or the obligation to return cash collateral received (a liability) under derivatives agreements.The table below summarizes the derivative positions presented in the balance sheets where a right of setoff exists under these arrangements and related cash collateral received or pledged.


     Assets Liabilities
        Eligible for Offset       Eligible for Offset   
           Cash          Cash   
        Derivative Collateral       Derivative Collateral   
     Gross Instruments Received Net Gross Instruments Pledged Net
March 31, 2014                        
PPL                        
 Energy Commodities $ 1,417  $ 1,268  $ 8  $ 141  $ 1,527  $ 1,268  $ 94  $ 165 
 Treasury Derivatives   14    14              225    14    24    187 
Total $ 1,431  $ 1,282  $ 8  $ 141  $ 1,752  $ 1,282  $ 118  $ 352 
                           

81



     Assets Liabilities
        Eligible for Offset       Eligible for Offset   
           Cash          Cash   
        Derivative Collateral       Derivative Collateral   
     Gross Instruments Received Net Gross Instruments Pledged Net
PPL Energy Supply                        
 Energy Commodities $ 1,417  $ 1,268  $ 8  $ 141  $ 1,527  $ 1,268  $ 94  $ 165 

LKE                        
 Treasury Derivatives                   $ 40       $ 20  $ 20 
                           
LG&E                        
 Treasury Derivatives                   $ 40       $ 20  $ 20 

December 31, 2013                        
PPL                        
 Energy Commodities $ 1,188  $ 912  $ 7  $ 269  $ 1,070  $ 912  $ 1  $ 157 
 Treasury Derivatives   91    61         30    174    61    23    90 
Total $ 1,279  $ 973  $ 7  $ 299  $ 1,244  $ 973  $ 24  $ 247 
                           
PPL Energy Supply                        
 Energy Commodities $ 1,188  $ 912  $ 7  $ 269  $ 1,070  $ 912  $ 1  $ 157 

LKE                        
 Treasury Derivatives                   $ 36       $ 20  $ 16 
                           
LG&E                        
 Treasury Derivatives                   $ 36       $ 20  $ 16 

   Assets Liabilities
      Eligible for Offset       Eligible for Offset   
         Cash          Cash   
      Derivative Collateral       Derivative Collateral   
   Gross Instruments Received Net Gross Instruments Pledged Net
                          
March 31, 2015                        
PPL                        
 Energy Commodities $ 1,298 $ 990 $ 11 $ 297 $ 1,163 $ 990 $ 49 $ 124
 Treasury Derivatives   258   105      153   243   105   21   117
Total $ 1,556 $ 1,095 $ 11 $ 450 $ 1,406 $ 1,095 $ 70 $ 241
                          
LKE                        
 Treasury Derivatives             $ 174    $ 21 $ 153
                          
LG&E                        
 Treasury Derivatives             $ 113    $ 21 $ 92
                          
KU                        
 Treasury Derivatives             $ 61    $  $ 61
                          
December 31, 2014                        
PPL                        
 Energy Commodities $ 1,318 $ 1,060 $ 10 $ 248 $ 1,217 $ 1,060 $ 58 $ 99
 Treasury Derivatives   159   65      94   161   65   21   75
Total $ 1,477 $ 1,125 $ 10 $ 342 $ 1,378 $ 1,125 $ 79 $ 174
                          
LKE                        
 Treasury Derivatives             $ 114    $ 20 $ 94
                          
LG&E                        
 Treasury Derivatives             $ 81    $ 20 $ 61
                          
KU                        
 Treasury Derivatives             $ 33       $ 33

Credit Risk-Related Contingent Features


Certain derivative contracts contain credit risk-related contingent features which, when in a net liability position, would permit the counterparties to require the transfer of additional collateral upon a decrease in the credit ratings of PPL, PPL Energy Supply, LKE, LG&E and KU or certain of their subsidiaries. Most of these features would require the transfer of additional collateral or permit the counterparty to terminate the contract if the applicable credit rating were to fall below investment grade. Some of these features also would allow the counterparty to require additional collateral upon each downgrade in the credit rating at levels that remain above investment grade. In either case, if the applicable credit rating were to fall below investment grade, (i.e., below BBB- for S&P or Fitch, or Baa3 for Moody's), and assuming no assignment to an investment grade affiliate were allowed, most of these credit contingent features require either immediate payment of the net liability as a termination payment or immediate and ongoing full collateralization on derivative instruments in net liability positions.


Additionally, certain derivative contracts contain credit risk-related contingent features that require adequate assurance of performance be provided if the other party has reasonable concerns regarding the performance of PPL's, obligationLKE's, LG&E's, and KU's obligations under the contract.contracts. A counterparty demanding adequate assurance could require a transfer of additional collateral or other security, including letters of credit, cash and guarantees from a creditworthy entity. This would typically

74

involve negotiations among the parties. However, amounts disclosed below represent assumed immediate payment or immediate and ongoing full collateralization for derivative instruments in net liability positions with "adequate assurance" features.


(All Registrants except PPL Electric and KU)

At March 31, 2014,2015, derivative contracts in a net liability position that contain credit risk-related contingent features, collateral posted on those positions and the related effect of a decrease in credit ratings below investment grade on derivative contracts that contain credit risk-related contingent features and were in a net liability position isare summarized as follows:


      PPL      
    PPL Energy Supply LKE LG&E
               
Aggregate fair value of derivative instruments in a net liability            
 position with credit risk-related contingent features $ 339   168   27   27 
Aggregate fair value of collateral posted on these derivative instruments   57    36    21    21 
Aggregate fair value of additional collateral requirements in the event of                
 a credit downgrade below investment grade (a)   363   209    7   

    PPL LKE LG&E
            
Aggregate fair value of derivative instruments in a net liability position with credit risk-related         
 contingent features $ 241 $ 31 $ 31
Aggregate fair value of collateral posted on these derivative instruments   140   22   22
Aggregate fair value of additional collateral requirements in the event of         
 a credit downgrade below investment grade (a)   128(b)  10   10

(a)Includes the effect of net receivables and payables already recorded on the Balance Sheet.

82



(b)PPL Energy Supply's credit rating is currently below investment grade. Amounts related to PPL Energy Supply represent net liability positions subject to further adequate assurance features.

15. Goodwill


(PPL)


The change in the carrying amount of goodwill for the three months ended March 31, 20142015 was due to the effect of foreign currency exchange rates on the U.K. Regulated segment.


16.  Asset Retirement Obligations
               
                  
(All Registrants except PPL Electric)             
                  
The changes in the carrying amounts of AROs were as follows.         
                  
       PPL         
    PPL Energy Supply LKE LG&E KU
                  
Balance at December 31, 2013 $ 705  $ 404  $ 252  $ 74  $ 178 
 Accretion expense   11    8    3    1    2 
 Changes in estimated cash flow or settlement date   4         4    1    3 
 Effect of foreign currency exchange rates   1                     
 Obligations settled   (3)   (2)   (1)   (1)     
Balance at March 31, 2014 $ 718  $ 410  $ 258  $ 75  $ 183 

16.  Asset Retirement Obligations            
               
(All Registrants except PPL Electric)          
               
The changes in the carrying amounts of AROs were as follows.        
               
               
    PPL LKE LG&E KU
               
Balance at December 31, 2014 $ 761 $ 285 $ 74 $ 211
 Accretion   12   3   1   2
 Effect of foreign currency exchange rates   (1)         
 Obligations settled   (1)   (1)   (1)   
Balance at March 31, 2015 $ 771 $ 287 $ 74 $ 213

Substantially all of the ARO balances are classified as noncurrent at March 31, 20142015 and December 31, 2013.


(PPL and PPL Energy Supply)

The2014.

See Note 10 for information on a CCR rule that is expected to require the recording of additional AROs in the second quarter of 2015.

(PPL)

PPL's most significant ARO recorded by PPL Energy Supply relates to the decommissioning of the Susquehanna nuclear plant. Assets in the NDT funds are legally restricted for purposes of settling this ARO.  See Notes 13 and 17 for additional information on these assets.


the assets in the NDT funds that are legally restricted for the purposes of settling this ARO.

(All Registrants except PPL LKE, LG&E and KU)


Electric)

LG&E's and KU's accretion and ARO-related depreciation expense are recorded as a regulatory asset, such that there is no net earnings impact.


17. Available-for-Sale Securities


(PPL and PPL Energy Supply)

(PPL)

Securities held by the NDT funds and auction rate securities are classified as available-for-sale. Available-for-sale securities are carried on the Balance Sheets at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on these securities are reported, net of tax, in OCI

75

or are recognized currently in earnings when a decline in fair value is determined to be other-than-temporary. The specific identification method is used to calculate realized gains and losses.


The following table shows the amortized cost, the gross unrealized gains and losses recorded in AOCI and the fair value of available-for-sale securities.


       March 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
          Gross Gross      Gross Gross  
       Amortized  Unrealized  Unrealized   Amortized  Unrealized  Unrealized  
       Cost Gains Losses Fair Value  Cost  Gains Losses Fair Value
NDT funds:                        
PPL and PPL Energy Supply                        
   Cash and cash equivalents $ 13          $ 13  $ 14          $ 14 
   Equity securities   271  $ 368        639    265  $ 363        628 
   Debt securities   218    9  $ 1    226    217    7  $ 3    221 
   Receivables/payables, net   1            1    1            1 
   Total NDT funds $ 503  $ 377  $ 1  $ 879  $ 497  $ 370  $ 3  $ 864 
                              
Auction rate securities:                        
 PPL $ 17      $ 1  $ 16  $ 20      $ 1  $ 19 
 PPL Energy Supply   14        1    13    17        1    16 


83


       March 31, 2015 December 31, 2014
          Gross Gross      Gross Gross  
       Amortized  Unrealized  Unrealized   Amortized  Unrealized  Unrealized  
       Cost Gains Losses Fair Value  Cost  Gains Losses Fair Value
NDT funds:                        
   Cash and cash equivalents $ 20       $ 20 $ 19       $ 19
   Equity securities   287 $ 426      713   283 $ 417      700
   Debt securities   218   12 $ 1   229   218   11      229
   Receivables/payables, net   3         3   2         2
   Total NDT funds $ 528 $ 438 $ 1 $ 965 $ 522 $ 428    $ 950
                              
Auction rate securities                        
 PPL $ 11    $ 1 $ 10 $ 11    $ 1 $ 10

See Note 13 for details on the securities held by the NDT funds.


There were no securities with credit losses at March 31, 20142015 and December 31, 2013.


2014.

The following table shows the scheduled maturity dates of debt securities held at March 31, 2014.


   Maturity Maturity Maturity Maturity   
    Less Than1-56-10in Excess  
   1 YearYearsYearsof 10 YearsTotal
PPL               
Amortized cost $ 11  $ 88  $ 57  $ 79  $ 235 
Fair value   11    90    59    82    242 
                 
PPL Energy Supply               
Amortized cost $ 11  $ 88  $ 57  $ 76  $ 232 
Fair value   11    90    59    79    239 

2015.

   Maturity Maturity Maturity Maturity   
    Less Than 1-5 6-10 in Excess   
   1 Year Years Years of 10 Years Total
                
Amortized cost $ 11 $ 82 $ 67 $ 69 $ 229
Fair value   11   84   70   74   239

The following table shows proceeds from and realized gains and losses on sales of available-for-sale securities for the periods ended March 31.


         Three Months
       2014  2013 
PPL and PPL Energy Supply            
Proceeds from sales of NDT securities (a)       $ 27  $ 24 
Other proceeds from sales         3      
Gross realized gains (b)         3    4 
Gross realized losses (b)         1    2 

     Three Months
       2015 2014
             
Proceeds from sales of NDT securities (a)       $ 38 $ 27
Other proceeds from sales            3
Gross realized gains (b)         5   3
Gross realized losses (b)         3   1

(a)These proceeds are used to pay income taxes and fees related to managing the trust. Remaining proceeds are reinvested in the trust.
(b)Excludes the impact of other-than-temporary impairment charges recognized on the Statements of Income.

18. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)


(PPL and PPL Energy Supply)

(PPL)

The after-tax changes in AOCI by component for the three months ended March 31 were as follows.

  Foreign Unrealized gains (losses)    Defined benefit plans   
  currency Available-    Equity Prior Actuarial Transition   
  translation for-sale Qualifying investees' service gain asset   
  adjustments securities derivatives AOCI costs (loss) (obligation) Total
                        
December 31, 2014$ (286) $ 202 $ 20 $ 1 $ 3 $ (2,215) $ 1 $ (2,274)
Amounts arising during the period  (66)   5   6         (1)      (56)
Reclassifications from AOCI     (1)   (17)   (1)      38      19
Net OCI during the period  (66)   4   (11)   (1)      37      (37)
March 31, 2015$ (352) $ 206 $ 9 $  $ 3 $ (2,178) $ 1 $ (2,311)
                         
76

  Foreign  Unrealized gains (losses)     Defined benefit plans    
  currency  Available-     Equity  Prior  Actuarial  Transition    
  translation for-sale  Qualifying  investees'  service  gain  asset    
  adjustments  securities  derivatives  AOCI  costs  (loss)  (obligation)  Total 
PPL                       
December 31, 2012$ (149) $ 112  $ 132  $ 1  $ (14) $ (2,023) $ 1  $ (1,940)
Amounts arising during the period  (245)   23    62                        (160)
Reclassifications from AOCI       (1)   (80)        1    34         (46)
Net OCI during the period  (245)   22    (18)        1    34         (206)
March 31, 2013$ (394) $ 134  $ 114  $ 1  $ (13) $ (1,989) $ 1  $ (2,146)
                         
December 31, 2013$ (11) $ 173  $ 94  $ 1  $ (6) $ (1,817) $ 1  $ (1,565)
Amounts arising during the period  131    5    (46)                       90 
Reclassifications from AOCI       (1)   19         1    27         46 
Net OCI during the period  131    4    (27)        1    27         136 
March 31, 2014$ 120  $ 177  $ 67  $ 1  $ (5) $ (1,790) $ 1  $ (1,429)
                         
PPL Energy Supply                       
December 31, 2012   $ 112  $ 211     $ (10) $ (265)      $ 48 
Amounts arising during the period     23                           23 
Reclassifications from AOCI     (1)   (30)      1    4         (26)
Net OCI during the period     22    (30)      1    4       (3)
March 31, 2013   $ 134  $ 181     $ (9) $ (261)    $ 45 
                         
December 31, 2013   $ 173  $ 88       $ (4) $ (180)      $ 77 
Amounts arising during the period     5                             5 
Reclassifications from AOCI     (1)   (5)        1    1         (4)
Net OCI during the period     4    (5)        1    1         1 
March 31, 2014   $ 177  $ 83       $ (3) $ (179)      $ 78 


84


  Foreign Unrealized gains (losses)    Defined benefit plans   
  currency Available-    Equity Prior Actuarial Transition   
  translation for-sale Qualifying investees' service gain asset   
  adjustments securities derivatives AOCI costs (loss) (obligation) Total
                        
December 31, 2013$ (11) $ 173 $ 94 $ 1 $ (6) $ (1,817) $ 1 $ (1,565)
Amounts arising during the period  131   5   (46)               90
Reclassifications from AOCI     (1)   19      1   27      46
Net OCI during the period  131   4   (27)      1   27      136
March 31, 2014$ 120 $ 177 $ 67 $ 1 $ (5) $ (1,790) $ 1 $ (1,429)

The following table presents the gains (losses) and related income taxes for reclassifications from AOCI for the three months ended March 31. The defined benefit plan components of AOCI are not reflected in their entirety in the statement of income during the period;periods; rather, they are included in the computation of net periodic defined benefit costs (credits). See Note 9 for additional information.


   2014 
   Affected Line Item on the Statements of Income
           Other            
   Unregulated       Income            
   Wholesale Energy Interest (Expense),   Total Income Total
Details about AOCI energy purchases Expense net Other Pre-tax Taxes After-tax
PPL                        
Available-for-sale securities           2      2   (1)  1 
Qualifying derivatives                        
 Interest rate swaps        (3)         (3)   2    (1)
 Cross-currency swaps            (29)      (29)   6    (23)
 Energy Commodities  1   7         1    9    (4)   5 
 Total  1   7   (3)  (29)  1    (23)   4    (19)
Defined benefit plans                        
 Prior service costs                  (2)   1    (1)
 Net actuarial loss                  (36)   9    (27)
 Total                 (38)  10    (28)
                          
Total reclassifications                    $ (46)
                          
PPL Energy Supply                        
Available-for-sale securities           2      2   (1)  1 
Qualifying derivatives                        
 Energy Commodities  1   7         1    9    (4)   5 
Defined benefit plans                        
 Prior service costs                  (2)   1    (1)
 Net actuarial loss                  (2)   1    (1)
 Total                 (4)  2    (2)
                          
Total reclassifications                    $ 4 
                          
   2013 
   Affected Line Item on the Statements of Income
           Other            
   Unregulated       Income            
   Wholesale Energy Interest (Expense),   Total Income Total
Details about AOCI energy purchases Expense net Other Pre-tax Taxes After-tax
PPL                        
Available-for-sale securities           2      2   (1)  1 
Qualifying derivatives                        
 Interest rate swaps        (5)         (5)   2    (3)
 Cross-currency swaps            69       69    (17)   52 
 Energy Commodities  67   (16)            51    (20)   31 
 Total  67   (16)  (5)  69         115    (35)   80 
Defined benefit plans                        
 Prior service costs                  (2)   1    (1)
 Net actuarial loss                  (47)   13    (34)
 Total                 (49)  14    (35)
                          
Total reclassifications                    $ 46 
                          
PPL Energy Supply                        
Available-for-sale securities           2      2   (1)  1 
Qualifying derivatives                        
 Energy Commodities  67   (16)            51    (21)   30 
Defined benefit plans                        
 Prior service costs                  (2)   1    (1)
 Net actuarial loss                  (6)   2    (4)
 Total                 (8)  3    (5)
                          
Total reclassifications                    $ 26 

85



      Affected Line Item on the
Details about AOCI 2015 2014  Statements of Income
           
Available-for-sale securities $ 2 $ 2  Other Income (Expense) - net
Total Pre-tax   2   2   
Income Taxes   (1)   (1)   
Total After-tax   1   1   
           
Qualifying derivatives         
 Interest rate swaps   (4)   (3)  Interest Expense
 Cross-currency swaps   17   (29)  Other Income (Expense) - net
     1     Interest Expense
 Energy commodities   (2)   (1)  Unregulated wholesale energy
     8   7  Energy purchases
        2  Discontinued operations
     1   1  Other
Total Pre-tax   21   (23)   
Income Taxes   (4)   4   
Total After-tax   17   (19)   
           
Equity investees' AOCI   2     Other Income (Expense) - net
Total Pre-tax   2      
Income Taxes   (1)      
Total After-tax   1      
           
Defined benefit plans         
 Prior service costs      (2)   
 Net actuarial loss   (51)   (36)   
Total Pre-tax   (51)   (38)   
Income Taxes   13   10   
Total After-tax   (38)   (28)   
           
Total reclassifications during the period $ (19) $ (46)   

19. New Accounting Guidance Pending Adoption


(All Registrants)


Reporting of Discontinued Operations

Accounting for Revenue from Contracts with Customers

In AprilMay 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards BoardFASB issued accounting guidance that changesestablishes a comprehensive new model for the recognition of revenue from contracts with customers. This model is based on the core principle that revenue should be recognized to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.

For public business entities, this guidance can be applied using either a full retrospective or modified retrospective transition method, beginning in annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those years. Early adoption is not permitted. The Registrants will adopt this guidance effective January 1, 2017.

The Registrants are currently assessing the impact of adopting this guidance, as well as the transition method they will use.

Reporting Uncertainties about an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern

In August 2014, the FASB issued accounting guidance which will require management to assess, for each interim and annual period, whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern. Substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern exists when relevant conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, indicate that it is probable that the entity will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after the date the financial statements are issued.

When management identifies conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern, management is required to disclose information that enables users of the financial statements to understand the principal conditions or events that raised substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern and management's evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events. If substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern has been alleviated as a result of management's plan, the entity should disclose information that allows the users of the financial statements to understand those plans. If the substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern is not alleviated by management's plans, management's plans to mitigate the conditions or events that gave rise to the substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern should be disclosed, as well as a statement that there is substantial doubt the entity's ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued.

For all entities, this guidance should be applied prospectively within the annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early adoption is permitted.

The Registrants will adopt this guidance for the annual period ending December 31, 2016. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Registrants.

Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share Is More Akin to Debt or to Equity

In November 2014, the FASB issued guidance that clarifies how current accounting guidance should be interpreted when evaluating the economic characteristics and risks of a host contract of a hybrid financial instrument issued in the form of a share. This guidance does not change the current criteria for determining whatwhether separation of an embedded derivative feature from a hybrid financial instrument is required. Entities are still required to evaluate whether the economic risks of the embedded derivative feature are clearly and closely related to those of the host contract, among other relevant criteria.

An entity should consider the substantive terms and features of the entire hybrid financial instrument, including the embedded derivative feature being evaluated for bifurcation, in evaluating the nature of the host contract to determine whether the host contract is more akin to a debt instrument or more akin to an equity instrument. An entity should assess the relative strength of the debt-like and equity-like terms and features when determining how to weight those terms and features.

For public business entities, this guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015 and should be classifiedapplied using a modified retrospective method for existing hybrid financial instruments issued in the form of a share as of the beginning of the fiscal year the guidance is adopted. Early adoption is permitted. Retrospective application is permitted but not required.

The Registrants will adopt this guidance on January 1, 2016. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Registrants.

Income Statement Presentation of Extraordinary and Unusual Items

In January 2015, the FASB issued accounting guidance that eliminates the concept of extraordinary items, which requires an entity to separately classify, present in the income statement and disclose material events and transactions that are both unusual and occur infrequently. The requirement to report material events or transactions that are unusual or infrequent as a discontinued operation and also changes the related presentation and disclosure requirements.  A discontinued operation may include aseparate component of income from continuing operations has been retained, as has the requirement to separately present the nature and financial effects of each event or transaction in the income statement as a separate component of continuing operations or disclose them within the notes to the financial statements. The scope of these requirements has been expanded to include items that are both unusual and occur infrequently.

For all entities, this guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted provided that an entity applies the guidance from the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The guidance may be applied either retrospectively or prospectively.

78

The Registrants will adopt this guidance on January 1, 2016. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a groupsignificant impact on the Registrants.

Simplifying the Presentation of componentsDebt Issuance Costs

In April 2015, the FASB issued accounting guidance to simplify the presentation of an entity, or a business activity.


A disposal of a component of an entity or a group of components of an entity is requireddebt issuance costs by requiring debt issuance costs to be reported in discontinued operations if the disposal represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effectpresented on the entity's operations and financial results when anybalance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the following occurs: (1) The componentsassociated debt liability, consistent with the presentation of an entity or group of components of an entity meets the criteria to be classified as held for sale, (2) The component of an entity or group of components of an entity is disposed of by sale, or (3) The component of an entity or group of components of an entity is disposed of other than by sale (for example, by abandonment or in a distribution to owners in a spinoff).

debt discounts.

For public business entities, this guidance should be applied prospectively to all disposals (or classifications as heldretrospectively for sale) of components of an entity that occur within the annual periodsfinancial statements issued for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2014,2015 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted.


The Registrants are assessing in which period they will adopt this new guidance. The newadoption of this guidance will impactrequire the amounts presented as discontinued operationsRegistrants to reclassify debt issuance costs from assets to long-term debt, and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Statements of Income and will enhance the related disclosure requirements.


Registrants.

79
86


Item 2. Combined Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations


(All Registrants)


This Item"Item 2. "CombinedCombined Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" is separately filed by PPL Corporation, PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and each of its Subsidiary Registrants.KU. Information contained herein relating to any individual Registrant is filed by such Registrant solely on its own behalf, and no Registrant makes any representation as to information relating to any other Registrant. The specific Registrant to which disclosures are applicable is identified in parenthetical headings in italics above the applicable disclosure or within the applicable disclosure for each Registrant's related activities and disclosures. Within combined disclosures, amounts are disclosed for any Registrant when significant.


The following should be read in conjunction with the Registrants' Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying Notes and with the Registrants' 20132014 Form 10-K. Capitalized terms and abbreviations are defined in the glossary. Dollars are in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise noted.


"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" includes the following information:


·"Overview" provides a description of each Registrant's business strategy, a summary of PPL's earnings, a description of key factors expected to impact future earnings and a discussion of important financial and operational developments.

·"Results of Operations" for PPL provides a more detailed analysis of earnings by segment, and for the Subsidiary Registrants PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU,includes a summary of earnings. For all Registrants, "Margins" provides explanations of non-GAAP financial measures and "Statement of Income Analysis" addresses significant changes in principal line items on the Statements of Income, comparing the three months ended March 31, 20142015 with 2013.the same period in 2014.

·"Financial Condition - Liquidity and Capital Resources" provides an analysis of the Registrants' liquidity positions and credit profiles. This section also includes a discussion of rating agency actions.

·"Financial Condition - Risk Management" provides an explanation of the Registrants' risk management programs relating to market and credit risk.

Overview


Introduction


(PPL)


PPL, headquartered in Allentown, Pennsylvania, is an energy and utility holding company. Through subsidiaries, PPL delivers electricity to customers in the U.K., Pennsylvania, Kentucky, Virginia and Tennessee; delivers natural gas to customers in Kentucky; generates electricity from power plants in the northeastern, northwestern and southeastern U.S.; and markets wholesale or retail energy primarily in the northeastern and northwestern portions of the U.S.


87




PPL's principal subsidiaries are shown below (* denotes an SEC registrant):

.

         PPL Corporation*        
                            
                  PPL Capital Funding      
    
                         
                        
   

PPL Global

Engages in the regulated distribution of electricity in the U.K.

  

LKE*

 

PPL Electric*

Engages in the regulated transmission and distribution of electricity in Pennsylvania

  

PPL Energy Supply*

  
                            
                            
   

LG&E*

Engages in the regulated generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity and distribution and sale of natural gas in Kentucky

  

KU*

Engages in the regulated generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity, primarily in Kentucky

  

PPL EnergyPlus

Performs energy marketing and trading activities

Purchases fuel

  

PPL Generation

Engages in the competitive generation of electricity, primarily in Pennsylvania and Montana

                        
   
U.K. Regulated

Segment
 
Kentucky Regulated
Segment
 
Pennsylvania Regulated Segment
 
Supply

Segment
  

PPL's reportable segments' results primarily represent the results of its related Subsidiary Registrants, except that the reportable segments are also allocated certain corporate level financing and other costs that are not included in the results of the applicable Subsidiary Registrants. The U.K. Regulated segment does not have a related Subsidiary Registrant.


(

In June 2014, PPL Energy Supply)


and PPL Energy Supply headquartered in Allentown, Pennsylvania, is an indirect wholly owned subsidiaryexecuted definitive agreements with affiliates of Riverstone to combine their competitive power generation businesses into a new, stand-alone, publicly traded company named Talen Energy. See "Business Strategy" and "Financial and Operational Developments - Other Financial and Operational Developments - Anticipated Spinoff of PPL and is an energy company that through its principal subsidiaries is primarily engagedEnergy Supply" below for additional information. Beginning in the competitive generation and marketingfirst quarter of electricity in two key markets:  the northeastern and northwestern U.S.2015, PPL Energy Supply's principal subsidiariesSupply is filing a separate Form 10-Q.

In addition to PPL, the other Registrants included in this filing are PPL EnergyPlus, its marketing and trading subsidiary, and PPL Generation, the owner of its generating facilities in Pennsylvania and Montana.


as follows.

(PPL Electric)


PPL Electric, headquartered in Allentown, Pennsylvania, is a direct wholly owned subsidiary of PPL and a regulated public utility that is an electricity transmission and distribution service provider in eastern and central Pennsylvania. PPL Electric is subject to regulation as a public utility by the PUC, and certain of its transmission activities are subject to the jurisdiction of FERC under the Federal Power Act. PPL Electric delivers electricity in its Pennsylvania service area and provides electricity supply to retail customers in that area as a PLR under the Customer Choice Act.


(LKE)


LKE, headquartered in Louisville, Kentucky, is a wholly owned subsidiary of PPL and a holding company that owns regulated utility operations through its subsidiaries, LG&E and KU, which constitute substantially all of LKE's assets. LG&E and KU are engaged in the generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity. LG&E also engages in the distribution and sale of natural gas. LG&E and KU maintain their separate corporate identities and serve customers in Kentucky under their respective names. KU also serves customers in Virginia under the Old Dominion Power name and in Tennessee under the KU name.


(LG&E)


LG&E,, headquartered in Louisville, Kentucky, is a wholly owned subsidiary of LKE and a regulated utility engaged in the generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity and distribution and sale of natural gas in Kentucky. LG&E is


88


subject to regulation as a public utility by the KPSC, and certain of its transmission activities are subject to the jurisdiction of the FERC under the Federal Power Act.

81

(KU)


KU, headquartered in Lexington, Kentucky, is a wholly owned subsidiary of LKE and a regulated utility engaged in the generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity in Kentucky, Virginia and Tennessee. KU is subject to regulation as a public utility by the KPSC, the VSCC and the TRA, and certain of its transmission and wholesale power activities are subject to the jurisdiction of the FERC under the Federal Power Act. KU serves its Virginia customers under the Old Dominion Power name and its Kentucky and Tennessee customers under the KU name.


Business Strategy


(All Registrants except PPL Energy Supply)


Registrants)

The strategy for the regulated businesses of WPD, PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU is to provide efficient, reliable and safe operations and strong customer service, maintain constructive regulatory relationships and achieve timely recovery of costs. These regulated businesses also focus on providing competitively priced energy to customers and achieving stable, long-term growth in earnings and rate base, or RAV, as applicable. Both rate base and RAV are expected to grow for the foreseeable future as a result of significant capital expenditure programs to maintain existing assets and to improve system reliability and, for LKE, LG&E and KU, to comply with federal and state environmental regulations related to coal-fired electricity generation facilities.  Future RAV for WPD will also be affected by RIIO-ED1,

For the U.K. regulated businesses, effective April 1, 2015 for the RIIO-ED1 price control period, 80% of network related expenditures are added to the RAV and, together with adjustments for inflation as measured by Retail Price Index (RPI) and a return on the recovery periodRAV, recovered through allowed revenue with the remaining 20% of expenditures being recovered in the current regulatory year. RAV is intended to represent expenditures that have a long-term benefit to WPD (similar to capital projects for assets placed in servicethe U.S. regulated businesses). The RAV balance at March 31, 2015 will continue to be recovered over 20 years and additions after that dateApril 1, 2023 will be extended from 20recovered over 45 years; a transitional arrangement will gradually change the life over the current price control period which commenced April 1, 2015, resulting in an expected average useful life of 35 years for RAV additions in that period. In addition, incentive targets have been adjusted in RIIO-ED1, resulting in lower overall incentive revenues available to 45 years.be earned. See "Other"Financial and Operational Developments - Other Financial and Operational Developments - RIIO-ED1 - Fast Tracking"RIIO-ED1" below for additional information.


Recovery

For the U. S. regulated businesses, recovery of capital project costs is attained through various rate-making mechanisms, including periodic base rate case proceedings, FERC formula rate mechanisms, and other regulatory agency-approved recovery mechanisms. In Kentucky, the KPSC has adopted a series of regulatory mechanisms (ECR, DSM, GLT, fuel adjustment clause, gas supply clause and recovery on certain construction work-in-progress) that reduce regulatory lag and provide for timely recovery of and a return on, as appropriate, prudently incurred costs. In Pennsylvania, the FERC transmission formula rate, DSIC mechanism and other recovery mechanisms are in place to reduce regulatory lag and provide for timely recovery of and a return on, as appropriate, prudently incurred costs.  See "Item 1. Business - Segment Information - U.K. Regulated Segment - Revenues

To manage financing costs and Regulation"access to credit markets, and to fund capital expenditures, a key objective of the Registrants is to maintain investment grade credit ratings and adequate liquidity positions. In addition, the Registrants have financial and operational risk management programs that, among other things, are designed to monitor and manage exposure to earnings and cash flow volatility related to, as applicable, changes in PPL's 2013 Form 10-K for changes toenergy and fuel prices, interest rates, counterparty credit quality and the regulatory framework in the U.K. applicable to WPD beginning in April 2015.


(operating performance of generating units. To manage these risks, PPL generally uses contracts such as forwards, options, swaps and insurance contracts.

(PPL)

In June 2014, PPL and PPL Energy Supply)Supply executed definitive agreements with affiliates of Riverstone to combine their competitive power generation businesses into a new, stand-alone, publicly traded company named Talen Energy. Under the terms of the agreements, at closing, PPL will spin off to PPL shareowners a newly formed entity, Holdco, which at such time will own all of the membership interests of PPL Energy Supply and all of the common stock of Talen Energy. Immediately following the spinoff, Holdco will merge with a special purpose subsidiary of Talen Energy, with Holdco continuing as the surviving company to the merger and as a wholly owned subsidiary of Talen Energy and the sole owner of PPL Energy Supply. Substantially contemporaneous with the spinoff and merger, RJS Power will be contributed by its owners to become a subsidiary of Talen Energy. Following completion of these transactions, PPL shareowners will own 65% of Talen Energy and affiliates of Riverstone will own 35%. PPL will have no continuing ownership interest in, control of, or affiliation with Talen Energy. The transaction is intended to be tax-free to PPL and its shareowners for U.S. federal income tax purposes and is subject to customary closing conditions, including receipt of required regulatory approvals from the NRC, FERC, DOJ and

82

PUC, all of which were received by mid-April 2015. In addition, there must be available, subject to certain conditions, at least $1 billion of undrawn credit capacity under a revolving credit or similar facility of Talen Energy or one or more of its subsidiaries. Any letters of credit or other credit support measures posted in connection with energy marketing and trading transactions at the time of the spinoff are excluded from this calculation.

In connection with the FERC approval, PPL and RJS Power have agreed that within 12 months after closing of the transaction, Talen Energy will divest approximately 1,300 MW of generating assets in one of two groups of assets (from PPL Energy Supply's existing portfolio, this includes either the Holtwood and Wallenpaupack hydroelectric facilities or the Ironwood facility), and limit PJM energy market offers from assets it would retain in the other group to cost-based offers.

On April 29, 2015, PPL's Board of Directors declared the distribution of Holdco to PPL's shareowners of record on May 20, 2015, with the spinoff to occur on June 1, 2015. Based on the number of shares of PPL common stock outstanding at April 29, 2015, the distribution ratio is expected to be approximately 0.125 shares of Talen common stock for each share of PPL common stock. The final ratio will be determined after the record date. The spinoff will have no effect on the number of PPL common shares owned by PPL shareowners or the number of shares of PPL common stock outstanding.

Talen Energy will own and operate a diverse mix of approximately 14,000 MW (after divestitures to meet FERC market power standards) of generating capacity in certain U.S. competitive energy markets primarily in PJM and ERCOT.

Following the transaction, PPL's focus will be on its regulated utility businesses in the U.K., Kentucky and Pennsylvania, serving more than 10 million customers. PPL intends to maintain a strong balance sheet and manage its finances consistent with maintaining investment grade credit ratings and providing a competitive total shareowner return, including an attractive dividend. Excluding costs required to provide transition services to Talen Energy and following the spinoff transaction, PPL expects to reduce annual ongoing corporate support costs by approximately $75 million.

See "Financial and Operational Developments - Other Financial and Operational Developments - Anticipated Spinoff of PPL Energy Supply" below for additional information.

The strategy for PPL Energy Supply is to optimize the value from its competitive generation asset and marketing portfolios while mitigating near-term volatility in both cash flows and earnings. PPL Energy Supply endeavors to do this by matching energy supply with load, or customer demand, under contracts of varying durations with creditworthy counterparties to capture profits while effectively managing exposure to energy and fuel price volatility, counterparty credit risk and operational risk. PPL Energy Supply is focused on maintaining profitability and positive cash flow during thethis current and projected period of low energy and capacity prices.  See "Financial and Operational Developments - Economic and Market Conditions" below for additional information.


(PPL)

Earnings generated by PPL's U.K. subsidiaries are subject to foreign currency translation risk. The U.K. subsidiaries also have currency exposure to the U.S. dollar to the extent they have U.S. dollar denominated debt. To manage these risks, PPL generally uses contracts such as forwards, options and cross currency swaps that contain characteristics of both interest rate and foreign currency exchange contracts.


(All Registrants)

To manage financing costs and access to credit markets, and to fund capital expenditures, a key objective of the Registrants is to maintain targeted credit profiles and liquidity positions.  In addition, the Registrants have financial and operational risk management programs that, among other things, are designed to monitor and manage exposure to earnings and cash flow volatility related to, as applicable, changes in energy and fuel prices, interest rates, counterparty credit quality and the operating performance of generating units.  To manage these risks, PPL generally uses contracts such as forwards, options and swaps.

89


Financial and Operational Developments


Earnings(PPL)


PPL's earnings by reportable segmentsegments for the periodperiods ended March 31, were as follows.


    Three Months
     2014  2013  % Change
             
U.K. Regulated    $ 206  $ 313   (34)
Kentucky Regulated      107    85   26 
Pennsylvania Regulated      85    64   33 
Supply      (75)   (46)  63 
Corporate and Other (a)      (7)   (3)  133 
Net Income Attributable to PPL Shareowners    $ 316  $ 413   (23)
             
EPS - basic    $ 0.50  $ 0.70   (29)
EPS - diluted (b)    $ 0.49  $ 0.65   (25)

follows:

    Three Months
    2015 2014 $ Change
           
U.K. Regulated  $ 375 $ 206 $ 169
Kentucky Regulated    109   107   2
Pennsylvania Regulated    87   85   2
Supply    95   (75)   170
Corporate and Other (a)    (19)   (7)   (12)
Net Income  $ 647 $ 316 $ 331
            
EPS - basic  $ 0.97 $ 0.50 $ 0.47
EPS - diluted (b)  $ 0.96 $ 0.49 $ 0.47

(a)Primarily represents financing and certain other costs incurred at the corporate level that have not been allocated or assigned to the segments, which are presented to reconcile segment information to PPL's consolidated results. 2015 includes certain costs related to the anticipated spinoff of PPL Energy Supply. See the following table of special items for additional information.
(b)See "2011 Equity Units" below and Note 4 to the Financial Statements for information on the Equity Units' impact on the calculation of diluted EPS.

83

The following after-tax gains (losses), in total, which management considers special items, impacted PPL's reportable segments' results for the periodperiods ended March 31. See PPL's "Results of Operations - Segment Earnings" for details of theseeach segment's special items.


  Three Months 
  2014  2013 
       
U.K. Regulated $ (58) $ 75 
Kentucky Regulated        1 
Supply   (149)   (117)
Total PPL $ (207) $ (41)

The changes in PPL's reportable segments

    Three Months
    2015 2014 $ Change
           
U.K. Regulated  $ 39 $ (58) $ 97
Supply (a)    95   (75)   170
Corporate and Other (b)    (6)      (6)
Total PPL  $ 128 $ (133) $ 261

(a)As a result of the anticipated spinoff of PPL Energy Supply, substantially representing PPL's Supply segment, management is now considering the operating results of the Supply segment to be a special item. See Note 8 to the Financial Statements for additional information.
(b)Primarily includes external transaction and transition costs related to the anticipated spinoff of PPL Energy Supply. See Note 8 to the Financial Statements for additional information.

2015 Outlook

(PPL)

In anticipation of the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply, no forward looking information, including an earnings forecast, is being provided for the three months ended March 31, 2014Supply segment.

Excluding special items, including Supply segment earnings, higher earnings are expected in 2015 compared with 2013, excluding2014, after adjusting 2014 to include certain dissynergies in the impact of special items,Corporate and Other category that were due torecorded in the Supply segment. The following projections and factors underlying these projections (on an after-tax basis):


·Increase at the U.K. Regulated segment primarily due to higher utility revenues driven by an April 1, 2013 price increase, and lower pension expense, partially offset by lower sales volumes due to weather, and higher depreciation.
·Increase at the Kentucky Regulated segment primarily due to higher sales volumes due to unusually cold weather and returns from additional environmental capital investments, partially offset by higher operation and maintenance expense.
·Increase at the Pennsylvania Regulated segment primarily due to higher transmission margins from additional capital investments, higher distribution margins due to unusually cold weather, and a benefit from a change in estimate of a regulatory liability.
·Relatively flat at the Supply segment primarily due to higher capacity prices, net benefits from unusually cold weather and lower interest expense, offset by lower baseload energy prices and the timing of a planned outage at the Susquehanna nuclear power plant.

See "Results of Operations" below are provided for further discussion of PPL's reportableother segments and analysis of results of operations.

2014 Outlook

(PPL)

Excluding special items, lower earnings are expected in 2014 compared with 2013.  The factors underlying these projections by segmentthe Corporate and Subsidiary Registrant are discussed below (on an after-tax basis).

Other category and the related Registrants.

(PPL's U.K. Regulated Segment)


Excluding special items, higher earnings are projected in 20142015 compared with 2013,2014, primarily driven by higher electricity delivery revenuelower income taxes, lower depreciation expense and lower pension expense,effects of foreign currency, partially offset by higher income taxes, higher depreciation and higher financing costs.


90



lower utility revenue as Western Power Distribution transitions to a new eight-year price control period (RIIO-ED1) effective April 1, 2015. The remaining 2015 foreign currency earnings exposure for this segment is 97 percent hedged.

(PPL's Kentucky Regulated Segment and LKE, LG&E and KU)


Excluding special items, lower

Higher earnings are projected in 20142015 compared with 2013,2014, primarily driven by anticipated electric and gas base rate increases and returns on additional environmental capital investments, partially offset by higher operation and maintenance expense, higher depreciation and higher financing costs, partially offset by returns on additional environmental capital investments and increased sales volumes.


costs.

(PPL's Pennsylvania Regulated Segment and PPL Electric)


Excluding special items, higherlower earnings are projected in 20142015 compared with 2013,2014, primarily driven by higher operation and maintenance expense, higher depreciation, higher financing costs and a benefit recorded in the first quarter of 2014 for a change in estimate of a regulatory liability, partially offset by higher transmission margins and returns on distribution improvement capital spending, partially offset by higher financing costsinvestments.

(PPL's Corporate and higher income taxes.


(PPL's Supply Segment and PPL Energy Supply)

Other Category)

Excluding special items, lower earningscosts are projected in 20142015 compared with 2013,2014, after adjusting 2014 to include certain dissynergies in the Corporate and Other category that were recorded in the Supply segment, primarily driven by lower energy and capacity prices, partially offset by the net realized benefits from unusually cold winter weather, lower financing costsreduction of those dissynergies in 2015 through corporate restructuring efforts and lower income taxes.


(All Registrants)


Earnings in future periods are subject to various risks and uncertainties. See "Forward-Looking Information," the rest of this Item 2, Notes 6 and 10 to the Financial Statements and "Item 1A. Risk Factors" in this Form 10-Q (as applicable) and "Item 1. Business" and "Item 1A. Risk Factors" in the Registrants' 20132014 Form 10-K for a discussion of the risks, uncertainties and factors that may impact future earnings.

84

Other Financial and Operational Developments


Economic and Market Conditions


(PPL and PPL Energy Supply)


Over the last few years, depressed wholesale market prices for electricity and natural gas have resulted from general weak economic conditions and other factors, including the impact of expanded domestic shale gas development and additional renewable energy sources.  During the first quarter of 2014, the PJM region experienced unusually cold weather conditions, higher demand and congestion patterns that increased natural gas and electricity prices in spot and near-term forward markets.

See "Margins - Changes in Non-GAAP Financial Measures - Unregulated Gross Energy Margins" below for additional information on energy margins.  Full year 2014 energy margins are still projected to be lower compared with 2013 due to a higher average hedge price in 2013, partially offset by higher pricing on unhedged generation.  PPL Energy Supply continues to review its business and operational plans, including capital and operation and maintenance expenditures, its hedging strategies and potential plant modifications to burn lower cost fuels.

(All Registrants except PPL Electric)

The businesses of PPL Energy Supply, LKE, LG&E and KU are subject to extensive federal, state and local environmental laws, rules and regulations, including those pertaining to coal combustion residuals,CCRs, GHG, effluent limitation guidelines and MATS. See "Financial Condition - Environmental Matters" below for additional information on these requirements. These and other stringent environmental requirements, combined with low energy margins for competitive generation, have led several energy companies, including PPL, PPL Energy Supply, LKE, LG&E and KU, to announce plans either to either temporarily or permanently close, or place in long-term reserve status, and/or impair certain of their coal-fired generating plants during 2012plants.

(PPL)

Given current and 2013.


(PPLforecasted economic and market conditions, the announced transaction with affiliates of Riverstone to form Talen Energy, PPL Energy Supply)

In September 2013, PPL Montana executed a definitive agreement to sell to NorthWestern 633 MW of hydroelectric generation facilities located in Montana for $900 million in cash, subject to certain adjustments.  In April 2014, the U.S. Department of JusticeSupply's current sub-investment grade credit rating and Federal Trade Commission granted early termination of PPL Montana's and NorthWestern's notifications under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976.  The sale remains subject to closing

91


conditions, including receipt of regulatory approvals by the FERC and the Montana Public Service Commission and certain third-party consents.  The sale is notTalen Energy's expected to close before the second half of 2014.

sub-investment grade credit rating, PPL Energy Supply believes its competitive coal-fired generation assets in Pennsylvania are well positioned to meet current environmental requirements based on prior and planned investments.  However, the current levels of energy and capacity prices in PJM, as well as management's forward view of these prices using its fundamental pricing models,will continue to challenge the recoverability of PPL Energy Supply's investment inmonitor its Pennsylvania coal-fired generation assets.  In the fourth quarter of 2013, management tested the Brunner Islandbusiness and Montour plants for impairmentoperational plans, including capital and concluded neither was impaired as of December 31, 2013.  The recoverability test was very sensitive to forward energy and capacity price assumptions, as well as forecasted operation and maintenance and capital spending.  Therefore, a further decline in forecasted long-term energy or capacity prices or changes in environmental laws requiring additional capital or operation and maintenance expenditures, could negatively impact PPLits hedging strategies and potential plant modifications to burn lower cost fuels. See "Margins - Changes in Non-GAAP Financial Measures - Unregulated Gross Energy Supply's operations of these facilities and potentially result in future impairment chargesMargins" below for some or all of the carrying value of these plants.  There were no events or changes in circumstances that indicated a recoverability test was required in the first quarter of 2014.  However, PPL Energy Supply will be closely monitoring the PJM capacity auction results in May 2014, which could require a recoverability test to be performed in the second quarter of 2014.  The carrying value of the Pennsylvania coal-fired generation assets was $2.6 billion as of March 31, 2014 ($1.4 billion for Brunner Island and $1.2 billion for Montour).

additional information on energy margins.

(All Registrants)


The Registrants cannot predict the impact that future economic and market conditions and regulatory requirements may have on their financial condition or results of operations.


(PPL)


Ofgem Review

Anticipated Spinoff of Line Loss Calculation


InPPL Energy Supply

Following the announcement of the transaction to form Talen Energy as discussed in "Business Strategy" above, efforts were initiated to identify the appropriate staffing for Talen Energy and for PPL and its subsidiaries following completion of the spinoff.  Organizational plans were substantially completed in 2014. The new organizational plans identified the need to resize and restructure the organizations and as a result, in 2014, estimated charges for employee separation benefits were recorded. See Note 8 in the 2014 Form 10-K for additional information. The separation benefits include cash severance compensation, lump sum COBRA reimbursement payments and outplacement services.  Most separations and payment of separation benefits are expected to be completed by the end of 2015. At March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, Ofgem issued its final decisionthe recorded liabilities related to the separation benefits were $19 million and $30 million, which are included in "Other current liabilities" on the methodologyBalance Sheets.

Additional employee-related costs to be used by all network operators to calculateincurred primarily include accelerated stock-based compensation and pro-rated performance-based cash incentive and stock-based compensation awards, primarily for PPL Energy Supply employees and for PPL employees who have become PPL Energy Supply employees in connection with the final line loss incentives and penalties fortransaction. These costs will be recognized at the DPCR4, which endedspinoff closing date. PPL estimates these additional costs will be in March 2010.  As a result, WPD recorded an increasethe range of $65$30 million to its existing liability with a reduction$40 million.

PPL recorded $6 million of third-party costs during the three months ended March 31, 2015 related to "Utility" revenuethis transaction. Of these costs, $2 million were primarily for legal and accounting fees to facilitate the transaction, and are recorded in "Other Income (Expense) - net" on the Statement of Income. WPD'sAn additional $4 million of consulting and other costs were incurred to ready the new Talen Energy organization and reconfigure the remaining PPL service functions. These costs are recorded in "Other operation and maintenance" on the Statement of Income. PPL recorded $27 million of third-party costs in 2014 related to this transaction. PPL currently estimates a range of total third-party costs that will ultimately be incurred of between $60 million and $70 million.

The assets and liabilities of PPL's Supply segment will continue to be classified as "held and used" on PPL's Balance Sheet until the closing of the transaction, at which time the operations of the Supply segment will be classified as discontinued operations. At the close of the transaction, unamortized losses on PPL interest rate swaps recorded liabilityin AOCI and designated as hedges of PPL Energy Supply's future interest payments will be reclassified into earnings and reflected in discontinued operations. The amount of these unamortized losses deferred in AOCI at March 31, 2015 was $55 million after-tax.

85

In conducting its annual goodwill impairment assessment in the fourth quarter of 2014 for its Supply segment reporting unit, PPL determined that the estimated fair value of the Supply segment exceeded its carrying value and no impairment was $115 million, nearly allrecognized. PPL had not identified any indicators of whichimpairment as of March 31, 2015, but cannot predict whether an impairment loss will be refunded to customers beginningrecorded at the spinoff date. An impairment loss would be recognized by PPL at the spinoff date if the aggregate carrying amount of the Supply segment's assets and liabilities exceed their aggregate fair value at that date and would be reflected in discontinued operations. Upon completion of this transaction, PPL will no longer have a Supply segment.

RIIO-ED1

On April 1, 2015, through March 31, 2019.  See Note 6 to the Financial Statements for additional information.


RIIO-ED1 - Fast Tracking

In February 2014, WPD elected to accept the decision of Ofgem to set the real cost of equity to be used during the RIIO-ED1 eight-year price control period at 6.4% compared to 6.7% proposed by WPD, and remain in the fast-track process.  The change in the cost of equity is not expected to have a significant impact on the results of operationscommenced for PPL.  Also, inWPD's four DNOs. In February 2014, Ofgem published formal confirmation that WPD's Business Plans submitted by its four DNOs have beenunder RIIO-ED1 were accepted as submitted, or "fast-tracked,"fast-tracked." for the 8-year price control period starting April 1, 2015. Fast tracking affords several benefits to the WPD DNOs including the ability to collect additional revenue equivalent to 2.5% of total annual expenditureexpenditures during the 8-yeareight-year price control period, or approximately $35$43 million annually, greater revenue certainty and a higher level of cost savings retention. See "Item 1. Business - Segment Information - U.K. Regulated Segment" of PPL's 20132014 Form 10-K for additional information on RIIO-ED1.

2011 Equity Units

In March 2014, PPL Capital Funding remarketed $978 million of 4.32% Junior Subordinated Notes due 2019 that were originally issued in April 2011 as

Depreciation

Effective January 1, 2015, after completing a component of PPL's 2011 Equity Units.  In connection with the remarketing, PPL Capital Funding retired $228 millionreview of the 4.32% Junior Subordinated Notes due 2019 and issued $350useful lives of its distribution network assets, WPD extended the weighted average useful lives of these assets to 69 years from 55 years. For the three months ended March 31, 2015, this change in useful lives resulted in lower depreciation of $20 million ($16 million after-tax or $0.02 per share). It is expected to result in an annual reduction in depreciation of 2.189% Junior Subordinated Notes due 2017 and $400 million 3.184% of Junior Subordinated Notes due 2019.  Simultaneously the newly issued notes were exchanged for $350 million of 3.95% Senior Notes due 2024 and $400 million of 5.00% Senior Notes due 2044.  Additionally, on May 1, 2014, PPL issued 31.7 million shares of common stock at $30.86 per share to settle the 2011 Purchase Contracts.  PPL received net cash proceeds of $978 million, which will be used to repay short-term debt and for general corporate purposes.


Kerr Dam Project Arbitration Decision and Impairment (PPL Energy Supply)

PPL Montana holds a joint operating license issued for the Kerr Dam Project.  The license extends until 2035 and, between 2015 and 2025, the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Nation (the Tribes) have the option to purchase,

92


hold and operate the Kerr Dam Project.  The parties submitted the issue of the appropriate amount of the conveyance price to arbitration in February 2013.  In March 2014, the arbitration panel issued its final decision holding that the conveyance price payable by the Tribes to PPL Montana is $18 million.  As a result of the decision, PPL Energy Supply performed a recoverability test on the Kerr Dam Project and recorded an impairment charge of $18approximately $81 million ($1065 million after-tax) to reduce the carrying amount to its fair value of $29 million.  See Note 13 to the Financial Statements for additional information.

after-tax or $0.10 per share) in 2015.

Susquehanna Turbine Blade Inspection(PPL and PPL Energy Supply)


PPL Susquehanna continues to make modifications to address the causes of turbine blade cracking at the PPL Susquehanna nuclear plant that was first identified in 2011.  In March 2014, Unit 2 completed its planned turbine inspection outage to replace blades.  Unit 1 begancompleted its planned refueling and turbine inspection outage in April 2014.  Similar blade replacements are plannedJune 2014 and modifications will also be implemented to reduce the likelihood of blade cracking, including the installation ofinstalled newly designed shorter last stage blades on one of the LPlow pressure turbines.  This change allowed Unit 1 to run with reduced blade vibration and no identified cracking during 2014. In the first, second and third quarters of 2014, Unit 2 was shut down for blade inspection and replacement, as well as additional maintenance.  The financial impact of the Unit 2 outages was not material.  Based on the positive experience on Unit 1, the same short blade modifications are currently being installed on two of the three turbines on Unit 2 during the spring 2015 scheduled refueling outage. All remaining turbine blade modifications are scheduled to be performed during planned refueling and maintenance outages. Inspections will be performed over the next several maintenance cycles to validate the performance of the modifications and ensure that the problem has been corrected. PPL Susquehanna will continuedoes not expect additional unscheduled turbine maintenance outages after these modifications are complete.

IRS Audits for 1998 - 2011

In February 2015, PPL and the IRS Appeals division reached a settlement on the amount of PPL's refund from its open audits for the years 1998 - 2011. The settlement was required to monitor blade performancebe reviewed and work withapproved by the turbine manufacturerJoint Committee on Taxation (JCT) before it is considered final. In April 2015, PPL was notified that the JCT approved PPL's settlement. Subject to identifya final determination of interest on the refund, PPL expects to record a tax benefit in the range of $20 million to $30 million in the second quarter of 2015 related to the settlement of previously unrecognized tax benefits.

(PPL and resolve the issues causing the blade cracking.


Storm Damage Expense Rider (SDER) (PPLPPL Electric)

In its December 28, 2012 final rate case order, the PUC directed PPL Electric to file a proposed SDER.  In

Rate Case Proceedings

On March 2013,31, 2015, PPL Electric filed its proposed SDERa request with the PUC for an increase in its annual distribution revenue requirement of approximately $167.5 million.  The proposal would result in a rate increase of 3.9% on a total bill basis and as partis expected to become effective on January 1, 2016.  PPL Electric's application includes a request for an authorized return-on-equity of that filing, requested recovery10.95%.  The application is based on a fully projected future test year of January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016.

Concurrently, PPL Electric filed a petition requesting a waiver of the 2012 qualifying storm costs relatedDSIC cap of 5% of billed revenues and approval to Hurricane Sandy.  On April 3, 2014,increase the maximum allowable DSIC from 5% to 7.5% for service rendered after January 1, 2016. PPL Electric is requesting that the PUC issued a final order approvingconsolidate these two proceedings and cannot predict the SDER.  The SDER will be effective January 1, 2015outcome.

86

(PPL, LKE and will initially include actual storm costs compared to collections from December 2013 through November 2014.  As a result of the order, PPL Electric reduced its regulatory liability by $12 million related to collections in excess of costs incurred from January 1, 2013 to November 30, 2013 that are not required to be refunded to customers.  Also, as part of the order, PPL Electric can recover Hurricane Sandy storm damage costs through the SDER over a three-year period beginning January 2015.  See "Pennsylvania Activities - Storm Damage Expense Rider" in Note 6 to the Financial Statements for additional information.


KU)

FERC Wholesale Formula Rates (LKE and KU)


In September 2013, KU filed an application with the FERC to adjust the formula rate under which KU provides wholesale requirements power sales to 12 municipal customers.  Among other changes, the application requests an amended formula whereby KU would charge cost-based rates with a subsequent true-up to actual costs, replacing the current formula which does not include a true-up.  KU's application proposed an authorized return on equity of 10.7%.  Certain elements, including the new formula rate, became effective April 23, 2014, subject to refund.  In April 2014, FERC accepted a motion filed by KU requesting a delay until mid-June of the effectiveness of other elements, including updated termination notice periods, new credit and uncollectible charge provisions.  Also in April 2014, nine municipalities submitted notices of termination, under the original notice period provisions, to cease taking power under the wholesale requirements contracts, suchcontracts.  Such terminations are to be effective in 2019, except in the case of one municipality with a conditional 2017 effective date.  TheIn addition, a tenth municipality which has a previously settled termination date of 2016 has given notice that it will transfer service in June 2015.  In July 2014, KU agreed on settlement terms with the two municipal customers that did not provide termination notices and filed the settlement proposal with the FERC for its approval.  In August 2014, the FERC issued an order on the interim settlement agreement allowing the proposed rates to become effective pending a final order.  If approved, the settlement agreement will resolve the rate case with respect to these two municipalities, including an authorized return on equity of 10% or the return on equity awarded to other parties are continuingin this case, whichever is lower.  Also in July 2014, KU made a contractually required filing with the FERC that addressed certain rate recovery matters affecting the nine terminating municipalities during the remaining term of their contracts.  KU and the terminating municipalities continue settlement negotiations.discussions in this proceeding.  KU cannot currently predict the outcome of its FERC applications regarding its wholesale power agreements with the municipalities.

(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)

Rate Case Proceedings

On November 26, 2014, LG&E and KU filed requests with the KPSC for increases in annual base electricity rates for LG&E's electric and gas operations and KU's electric operations.  On April 20, 2015, LG&E and KU, and the other parties to the proceeding, or related matters.


filed a unanimous settlement agreement with the KPSC.  Among other things, the proposed settlement provides for increases in the annual revenue requirements associated with KU base electric rates of $125 million and LG&E base gas rates of $7 million.  The annual revenue requirement associated with base electric rates at LG&E will not increase.  The settlement did not establish a specific return on equity with respect to the base rates, however an authorized 10% return on equity will be utilized in the ECR and GLT mechanisms.  The settlement agreement provides for deferred recovery of costs associated with Green River Units 3 and 4 through their retirement.  The new regulatory asset will be amortized over three years. The settlement also provides regulatory asset treatment for the difference between pension expense currently booked in accordance with LG&E and KU's pension accounting policy and such an expense using a 15 year amortization period for actuarial gains and losses. The proposed settlement remains subject to KPSC approval. If approved, the new rates and all elements of the settlement would be effective July 1, 2015.

Results of Operations


(PPL)


The discussion for PPL provides a review of results by reportable segment. The "Margins" discussion provides explanations of non-GAAP financial measures (Kentucky Gross Margins, Pennsylvania Gross Delivery Margins and Unregulated Gross Energy Margins) and a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to "Operating Income." The "Statement of Income Analysis" discussion addresses significant changes in principal line items on PPL's Statements of Income, comparing the three months ended March 31, 20142015 with 2013.the same period in 2014. "Segment Earnings, Margins and Statement of Income Analysis" is presented separately for PPL.


Tables analyzing changes in amounts between periods within "Segment Earnings" and "Statement of Income Analysis" are presented on a constant U.K. foreign currency exchange rate basis, where applicable, in order to isolate the impact of the change in the exchange rate on the item being explained. Results computed on a constant U.K. foreign currency exchange rate basis are calculated by translating current year results at the prior year weighted-average U.K. foreign currency exchange rate.



93


(Subsidiary Registrants)


The discussion for each of PPL Energy Supply, PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU provides a summary of earnings. The "Margins" discussion includes a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to "Operating Income" and "Statement of Income Analysis"

87

addresses significant changes in principal line items on the Statements of Income comparing the three months ended March 31, 20142015 with 2013.the same period in 2014. "Earnings, Margins and Statement of Income Analysis" areis presented separately for PPL Energy Supply, PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU.


(All Registrants)


The results for interim periods can be disproportionately influenced by numerous factors and developments and by seasonal variations. As such, the results of operations for interim periods do not necessarily indicate results or trends for the year or future periods.


PPLPPL: Segment Earnings, Margins and Statement of Income Analysis


Segment Earnings


U.K. Regulated Segment


The U.K. Regulated segment consists of PPL Global which primarily includes WPD's regulated electricity distribution operations, the results of hedging the translation of WPD's earnings from British pound sterling into U.S. dollars, and certain costs, such as U.S. income taxes, administrative costs, and allocated financing costs. The U.K. Regulated segment represents 65%58% of Net Income Attributable to PPL Shareowners for the three months ended March 31, 20142015 and 34%33% of PPL's assets at March 31, 2014.


2015.

Net Income Attributable to PPL Shareowners for the periods ended March 31 includes the following results:


   Three Months
   2014  2013  % Change
          
Utility revenues $ 637  $ 638     
Energy-related businesses   11    10   10 
 Total operating revenues   648    648     
Other operation and maintenance   108    117   (8)
Depreciation   83    74   12 
Taxes, other than income   38    37   3 
Energy-related businesses   7    7     
 Total operating expenses   236    235     
Other Income (Expense) - net   (24)   120   (120)
Interest Expense   122    107   14 
Income Taxes   60    113   (47)
Net Income Attributable to PPL Shareowners $ 206  $ 313   (34)

    Three Months
    2015 2014 $ Change
            
Utility revenues  $ 686 $ 637 $ 49
Energy-related businesses    11   11   
 Total operating revenues    697   648   49
Other operation and maintenance    103   108   (5)
Depreciation    59   83   (24)
Taxes, other than income    36   38   (2)
Energy-related businesses    7   7   
 Total operating expenses    205   236   (31)
Other Income (Expense) - net    88   (24)   112
Interest Expense    100   122   (22)
Income Taxes    105   60   45
Net Income  $ 375 $ 206 $ 169

The changes in the results of the U.K. Regulated segment between these periods were due to the factors set forth below, which reflect certain items that management considers special and effects of movements in foreign currency exchange on separate lines within the table and not in their respective Statement of Income line items. See below for additional detail of the special items.


    Three Months
U.K.    
 Utility revenues  $  40 33
 Other operation and maintenance     7 (3)
 Depreciation     (6)20
 Interest expense     (4)
Other (3)5
 Income taxes     (3)(6)
U.S.    
 Interest expense and other     (3)9
 Income taxes     (4)7
Foreign currency exchange, after-tax     2 7
Special items, after-tax     (133)97
Total  $ (107)169


94


U.K.


·Higher utility revenues were primarily due to a $68$42 million impact from the April 1, 20132014 price increase, partially offset by $24$10 million of lower volume due primarily to weather.volume.

·Lower other operation and maintenance wasdepreciation expense primarily due to $9a $20 million impact of lower pension expense and $6 millionan extension of lower engineering management expense, partially offset by $9 million of higherthe network maintenance expense.asset lives. See Note 2 to the Financial Statements for additional information.
88

·Higher depreciation expense was primarily due to PP&E additions.

The following after-tax gains (losses), which management considers special items, also impacted the U.K. Regulated segment's results during the periods ended March 31.


   Income Statement Three Months
   Line Item 2014  2013 
          
Foreign currency-related economic hedges, net of tax of $3, ($42) (a) Other Income (Expense) - net $ (6) $ 78 
WPD Midlands acquisition-related adjustments:       
 Separation benefits, net of tax of $0, $1Other operation and maintenance        (1)
 Other acquisition-related adjustments, net of tax of $0, $0Other operation and maintenance        (2)
Other:       
 Change in WPD line loss accrual, net of tax of $13, $0 (b) Utility   (52)   
Total  $ (58) $ 75 

    Income Statement Three Months
    Line Item 2015 2014
           
  Other Income      
Foreign currency-related economic hedges, net of tax of $(20), $3 (a) (Expense)-net $ 37 $ (6)
   Other operation      
WPD Midlands acquisition-related adjustment, net of tax of $(1), $0 and maintenance   2   
Change in WPD line loss accrual, net of tax of $0, $13 (b) Utility      (52)
Total   $ 39 $ (58)

(a) Represents unrealized gains (losses) on contracts that economically hedge anticipated GBP denominated earnings.

(a)Represents unrealized gains (losses) on contracts that economically hedge anticipated GBP-denominated earnings.
(b)In March 2014, Ofgem issued its final decision on the DPCR4 line loss incentives and penalties mechanism.  mechanism.As a result, WPD increased its existing liability by $65 million, pre-tax, for over-recovery of line losses. See Note 6 to the Financial Statements for additional information.

Kentucky Regulated Segment


The Kentucky Regulated segment consists primarily of LKE's regulated electricity generation, transmission and distribution operations of LG&E and KU, as well as LG&E's regulated distribution and sale of natural gas in Kentucky.gas. In addition, certain financing costs are allocated to the Kentucky Regulated segment. The Kentucky Regulated segment represents 34%17% of Net Income Attributable to PPL Shareowners for the three months ended March 31, 20142015 and 25%27% of PPL's assets at March 31, 2014.


2015.

Net Income Attributable to PPL Shareowners for the periods ended March 31 includes the following results:


   Three Months
   2014  2013  % Change
         
Utility revenues $ 934  $ 800   17 
Fuel   277    231   20 
Energy purchases   124    86   44 
Other operation and maintenance   206    197   5 
Depreciation   86    82   5 
Taxes, other than income   13    12   8 
 Total operating expenses   706    608   16 
Other Income (Expense) - net   (2)   (2)    
Interest Expense   55    55     
Income Taxes   64    50   28 
Net Income Attributable to PPL Shareowners $ 107  $ 85   26 

    Three Months
    2015 2014 $ Change
           
Utility revenues  $ 899 $ 934 $ (35)
Fuel      253   277   (24)
Energy purchases    92   124   (32)
Other operation and maintenance    209   206   3
Depreciation    95   86   9
Taxes, other than income    14   13   1
 Total operating expenses    663   706   (43)
Other Income (Expense) - net    (1)   (2)   1
Interest Expense    55   55   
Income Taxes    71   64   7
Net Income  $ 109 $ 107 $ 2

The changes in the results of the Kentucky Regulated segment between these periods were due to the factors set forth below, which reflect amounts classified as Kentucky Gross Margins andon a certain item that management considers special on separate linesline within the table and not in their respective Statement of Income line items.


95



  Three Months
    
Kentucky Gross Margins $ 50 14
Other operation and maintenance   (11) (2)
Depreciation   (2)
Taxes, other than income  (1)(4)
Other Income (Expense) - net   1
Income Taxestaxes   (14)
Special item - EEI adjustments, after-tax  (1)(7)
Total $ 22 2

·See "Margins - Changes in Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for an explanation of Kentucky Gross Margins.

·Higher other operation and maintenancedepreciation expense primarily due to $5 million of higher costs due to the timing and scope of scheduled coal plant maintenance outages and $5 million of higher storm expenses.PP&E additions, net.

·Higher income taxes primarily due to higher pre-tax income.income which increased income taxes by $4 million and the establishment of a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset of $3 million.

·During the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Kentucky Regulated segment classified an after-tax gain related to its EEI investment that was recorded in "Other Income (Expense) - net" on the Statement of Income as a special item.

Pennsylvania Regulated Segment


The Pennsylvania Regulated segment includes the regulated electricity transmission and distribution operations of PPL Electric. In addition, certain financing costs are allocated to the Pennsylvania Regulated segment.  The Pennsylvania Regulated segment represents 27%13% of Net Income Attributable to PPL Shareowners for the three months ended March 31, 20142015 and 15%16% of PPL's assets at March 31, 2014.


Net Income Attributable to PPL Shareowners for the periods ended March 31 includes the following results:
          
   Three Months
   2014  2013  % Change
         
Utility revenues $ 592  $ 513   15 
Energy purchases        
 External   189    172   10 
 Intersegment   27    14   93 
Other operation and maintenance   134    133   1 
Depreciation   45    43   5 
Taxes, other than income   32    30   7 
 Total operating expenses   427    392   9 
Other Income (Expense) - net   2    1   100 
Interest Expense   29    25   16 
Income Taxes   53    33   61 
Net Income Attributable to PPL Shareowners $ 85  $ 64   33 

2015.

Net Income for the periods ended March 31 includes the following results:
            
    Three Months
    2015 2014 $ Change
            
Utility revenues  $ 630 $ 592 $ 38
Energy purchases          
 External    227   189   38
 Intersegment    9   27   (18)
Other operation and maintenance    133   134   (1)
Depreciation    51   45   6
Taxes, other than income    35   32   3
 Total operating expenses    455   427   28
Other Income (Expense) - net    2   2   
Interest Expense    31   29   2
Income Taxes    59   53   6
Net Income  $ 87 $ 85 $ 2

The changes in the components of the Pennsylvania Regulated segment's results between these periods were due to the factors set forth below, which reflect amounts classified as Pennsylvania Gross Delivery Margins on a separate line and not in their respective Statement of Income line items.


   Three Months
     
Pennsylvania Gross Delivery Margins  $ 13
Other operation and maintenance $ 45  2
Depreciation     (2)(6)
Interest Expenseexpense     (4)(2)
Other    1
Income Taxestaxes     (19)(6)
Total  $ 21 2

·See "Margins - Changes in Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for an explanation of Pennsylvania Gross Delivery Margins.

·Higher interestdepreciation expense primarily due to a debt issuance in July 2013.transmission PP&E additions, net as well as additions related to the ongoing efforts to ensure the reliability of the delivery system and the replacement of aging infrastructure.

·Higher income taxes primarily due to higher pre-tax income.

96


Supply Segment


The Supply segment primarily consists of PPL Energy Supply's wholesale, retail, marketing and trading activities, as well as its competitive generation operations. In addition, certain financing and other costs are allocated to the Supply segment. The Supply segment represents negative 24%15% of Net Income Attributable to PPL Shareowners for the three months ended March 31, 20142015 and 26%22% of PPL's assets at March 31, 2014.

2015.

In June 2014, PPL and PPL Energy Supply, which primarily represents PPL's Supply segment, executed definitive agreements with affiliates of Riverstone to combine their competitive power generation businesses into a new, stand-alone, publicly traded company named Talen Energy. Upon completion of this transaction, PPL will no longer have a Supply segment. See Note 8 to the Financial Statements for additional information.

Net Income for the periods ended March 31 includes the following results:
            
    Three Months
    2015 2014 $ Change
Energy revenues          
 External (a) (b)  $ 833 $ (1,107) $ 1,940
 Intersegment    9   27   (18)
Energy-related businesses    104   125   (21)
 Total operating revenues    946   (955)   1,901
Fuel (a)    351   482   (131)
Energy purchases (a) (c)    1   (1,804)   1,805
Other operation and maintenance    226   229   (3)
Depreciation    77   75   2
Taxes, other than income    15   18   (3)
Energy-related businesses    98   124   (26)
 Total operating expenses    768   (876)   1,644

Net Income Attributable to PPL Shareowners for the periods ended March 31 includes the following results:
          
   Three Months
   2014  2013  % Change
Energy revenues        
 External (a) (b) $ (1,078) $ 381   (383)
 Intersegment   27    14   93 
Energy-related businesses   125    113   11 
 Total operating revenues   (926)   508   (282)
Fuel (a)   482    298   62 
Energy purchases (a) (c)   (1,804)   (199)  807 
Other operation and maintenance   258    235   10 
Depreciation   80    78   3 
Taxes, other than income   21    17   24 
Energy-related businesses   124    110   13 
 Total operating expenses   (839)   539   (256)
Other Income (Expense) - net   6    4   50 
Interest Expense   48    60   (20)
Income Taxes   (54)   (41)  32 
Net Income Attributable to PPL Shareowners $ (75) $ (46)  63 

90

    Three Months
    2015 2014 $ Change
           
Other Income (Expense) - net    7   6   1
Interest Expense    38   46   (8)
Income Taxes    52   (52)   104
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations       (8)   8
Net Income  $ 95 $ (75) $ 170

(a)Includes the impact from energy-related economic activity. See "Commodity Price Risk (Non-trading) - Economic Activity" in Note 14 to the Financial Statements for additional information.
(b)2014 includes significant realized and unrealized losses on physical and financial commodity sales contracts due to the unusually cold weather.weather experienced in the first quarter of 2014.
(c)2014 includes significant realized and unrealized gains on physical and financial commodity purchase contracts due to the unusually cold weather.weather experienced in the first quarter of 2014.

The changes in the results of the Supply segment between these periods were due to the factors set forth below, which reflect amounts classified as Unregulated Gross Energy Margins and certain other items that management considers special on separate lines within the table and not in their respective Statement of Income line items. See below for additional detail of the specialthese other items.


   Three Months
     
Unregulated Gross Energy Margins  $ (58)
Other operation and maintenance     (3)8
DepreciationOther Income (Expense) - net     (2)1
Interest Expenseexpense     12 9
Income TaxesOther    2
Income taxes     (11) 5
SpecialEnergy-related businesses 5
Discontinued operations, after-tax 27
Other items, after-tax     (32)171
Total  $ (29)
170

·See "Margins - Changes in Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for an explanation of Unregulated Gross Energy Margins.

·Lower other operation and maintenance primarily due to lower labor costs attributable to restructuring activities.

·Lower interest expense primarily due to certain PPL Capital Funding debt no longer being associated with the retirementSupply segment in 2015 and represents a dissynergy for PPL related to the spinoff of debt in December 2013.PPL Energy Supply.

·Higher income taxes primarily due to higher pre-tax income.

The following after-tax gains (losses), which management considers specialreflected as "Other items, after-tax" in the table above, also impacted the Supply segment's results during the periods ended March 31.


   Income Statement Three Months
   Line Item 2014  2013 
          
Adjusted energy-related economic activity, net, net of tax of $95, $79(a) $ (139) $ (117)
Kerr Dam Project impairment, net of tax of $8, $0 (b) Other operation and maintenance   (10)   
Total  $ (149) $ (117)

   Income Statement  Three Months
   Line Item  2015 2014
           
Adjusted energy-related economic activity - net, net of tax of $(18), $95(a)  $ 27 $ (139)
 Discontinued       
Kerr Dam Project impairment, net of tax of $0, $8 (b)Operations       (10)
   Other operation       
Corette closure costs, net of tax of $2, $0 (c)and maintenance    (3)   
Spinoff of PPL Energy Supply:        
   Other operation       
 Transition costs, net of tax of $0, $0and maintenance    (1)   
  Other operation       
 Employee transitional services, net of tax of $1, $0and maintenance    (1)   
Total   $ 22 $ (149)

(a)Represents unrealized gains (losses), after-tax, on economic activity. See "Commodity Price Risk (Non-trading) - Economic Activity" in Note 14 to the Financial Statements for additional information. Amounts have been adjusted for insignificant option premiums of $2 million and $1 million.premiums.

97


(b)In 2014, an arbitration panel issued its final decision holding that the conveyance price payable to PPL Montana was $18 million. As a result, PPL determined the Kerr Dam Project was impaired and recorded a pre-tax charge of $18 million. See Note 13 to the Financial Statements for additional information.

(c)Operations were suspended and the Corette plant was retired in March 2015.

Margins


Non-GAAP Financial Measures


Management utilizes the following non-GAAP financial measures as indicators of performance for its businesses.


91

·"Kentucky Gross Margins" is a single financial performance measure of the Kentucky Regulated segment's, LKE's, LG&E's and KU's electricity generation, transmission and distribution operations of the Kentucky Regulated segment, LKE, LG&E and KU, as well as the Kentucky Regulated segment's, LKE's and LG&E's distribution and sale of natural gas. In calculating this measure, fuel, energy purchases and certain variable costs of production (recorded as "Other operation and maintenance" on the Statements of Income) are deducted from revenues. In addition, certain other expenses, recorded as "Other operation and maintenance", "Depreciation" and "Depreciation""Taxes, other than income" on the Statements of Income, associated with approved cost recovery mechanisms are offset against the recovery of those expenses, which are included in revenues. These mechanisms allow for direct recovery of these expenses and, in some cases, returns on capital investments and performance incentives. As a result, this measure represents the net revenues from the electricity and gas operations.

·"Pennsylvania Gross Delivery Margins" is a single financial performance measure of the Pennsylvania Regulated segment's and PPL Electric's electricity delivery operations of the Pennsylvania Regulated segment and PPL Electric, which includes transmission and distribution activities. In calculating this measure, utility revenues and expenses associated with approved recovery mechanisms, including energy provided as a PLR, are offset with minimal impact on earnings. Costs associated with these mechanisms are recorded in "Energy purchases," "Other operation and maintenance," which is primarily Act 129 costs, and "Taxes, other than income," which is primarily gross receipts tax. This performance measure includes PLR energy purchases by PPL Electric from PPL EnergyPlus, which are reflected in "PLR intersegment utility revenue (expense)" in the reconciliation table below (in "Energy purchases from affiliate" in PPL Electric's reconciliation table). As a result, this measure represents the net revenues from the Pennsylvania Regulated segment's and PPL Electric's electricity delivery operations.

·"Unregulated Gross Energy Margins" is a single financial performance measure of the Supply segment's and PPL Energy Supply's competitive energy activities, which are managed on a geographic basis. In calculating this measure, energy revenues, including operating revenues associated with certain businesses classified as discontinued operations, are offset by the cost of fuel, energy purchases, certain other operation and maintenance expenses, primarily ancillary charges, gross receipts tax, recorded in "Taxes, other than income," and operating expenses associated with certain businesses classified as discontinued operations. This performance measure is relevant due to the volatility in the individual revenue and expense lines on the Statements of Income that comprise "Unregulated Gross Energy Margins." This volatility stems from a number of factors, including the required netting of certain transactions with ISOs and significant fluctuations in unrealized gains and losses. Such factors could result in gains or losses being recorded in either "Unregulated wholesale energy",energy," "Unregulated retail energy" or "Energy purchases" on the Statements of Income. This performance measure includes PLR revenues from energy sales to PPL Electric by PPL EnergyPlus, which are reflected in "PLR intersegment utility revenue (expense)" in the reconciliation table below (in "Unregulated wholesale energy to affiliate" in PPL Energy Supply's reconciliation table).below. "Unregulated Gross Energy Margins" excludes adjusted energy-related economic activity, which includes the changes in fair value of positions used to economically hedge a portion of the economic value of the competitive generation assets, full-requirement sales contracts and retail activities. This economic value is subject to changes in fair value due to market price volatility of the input and output commodities (e.g., fuel and power) prior to the delivery period that was hedged. Adjusted energy-related economic activity includes the ineffective portion of qualifying cash flow hedges and premium amortization associated with options. This economicUnrealized gains and losses related to this activity isare deferred and included in "Unregulated Gross Energy Margins" over the delivery period of the item that was hedged or upon realization.

These measures are not intended to replace "Operating Income," which is determined in accordance with GAAP, as an indicator of overall operating performance. Other companies may use different measures to analyze and report their results of their operations. Management believes these measures provide additional useful criteria to make investment decisions. These performance measures are used, in conjunction with other information, by senior management and PPL's Board of Directors to manage the operations and analyze actual results compared with budget and, in certain cases, to measure certain corporate financial goals used to determine variable compensation.


budget.

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures


The following table contains the components from the Statement of Income that are included in the non-GAAP financial measures and a reconciliation to PPL's "Operating Income" for the periods ended March 31.


98



      2014 Three Months 2013 Three Months
          Unregulated          Unregulated      
      Kentucky PA Gross Gross       Kentucky PA Gross Gross      
      Gross Delivery Energy    Operating Gross Delivery Energy     Operating
      Margins Margins Margins Other (a) Income (b) Margins Margins Margins Other (a) Income (b)
                           
Operating Revenues                                
 Utility $ 934  $ 592     $ 636 (c) $ 2,162  $ 800  $ 513     $ 637 (c) $ 1,950 
 PLR intersegment utility                                
  revenue (expense) (d)      (27) $ 27              (14) $ 14        
 Unregulated wholesale energy         (637)   (792)(e)   (1,429)         966    (823)(e)   143 
 Unregulated retail energy         378    (29)(e)   349          246    (9)(e)   237 
 Energy-related businesses            141     141             127     127 
   Total Operating Revenues   934    565    (232)   (44)    1,223    800    499    1,226    (68)    2,457 
                                     
Operating Expenses                                
 Fuel   277       481          758    231       297    1 (e)   529 
 Energy purchases   124    189    (1,219)   (588)(e)   (1,494)   86    172    437    (638)(e)   57 
 Other operation and                                
  maintenance   23    25    7    642     697    25    22    5    624     676 
 Depreciation   2            303     305                   284     284 
 Taxes, other than income        29    13    62     104         28    8    60     96 
 Energy-related businesses         2    136     138          2    120     122 
   Total Operating Expenses   426    243    (716)   555     508    342    222    749    451     1,764 
Total $ 508  $ 322  $ 484  $ (599)  $ 715  $ 458  $ 277  $ 477  $ (519)  $ 693 

92

      2015 Three Months 2014 Three Months
          Unregulated          Unregulated      
      Kentucky PA Gross Gross      Kentucky PA Gross Gross     
      Gross Delivery Energy    Operating Gross Delivery Energy     Operating
      Margins Margins Margins Other (a) Income (b) Margins Margins Margins Other (a) Income (b)
Operating Revenues                                
 Utility $ 899 $ 630    $ 685(c) $ 2,214 $ 934 $ 592    $ 636(c) $ 2,162
 PLR intersegment utility                                
  revenue (expense) (d)      (9) $ 9             (27) $ 27       
 Unregulated wholesale energy         614   (93)(e)   521         (665)   (792)(e)   (1,457)
 Unregulated retail energy         324   (14)(e)   310         377   (29)(e)   348
 Energy-related businesses            120    120            141    141
   Total Operating Revenues   899   621   947   698    3,165   934   565   (261)   (44)    1,194
                                     
Operating Expenses                                
 Fuel   253      351       604   277      481       758
 Energy purchases   92   227   152   (150)(e)   321   124   189   (1,219)   (588)(e)   (1,494)
 Other operation and                                
  maintenance   24   26   4   614    668   23   25   7   613    668
 Depreciation   7         286    293   2         298    300
 Taxes, other than income   1   33   12   55    101      29   13   59    101
 Energy-related businesses         2   109    111         2   136    138
   Total Operating Expenses   377   286   521   914    2,098   426   243   (716)   518    471
 Income (Loss) from                                
  Discontinued Operations                         29   (29)(f)   
Total    $ 522 $ 335 $ 426 $ (216)  $ 1,067 $ 508 $ 322 $ 484 $ (591)  $ 723

(a)Represents amounts excluded from Margins.
(b)As reported on the Statements of Income.
(c)Primarily represents WPD's utility revenue.
(d)Primarily related to PLR supply sold by PPL EnergyPlus to PPL Electric.
(e)Includes energy-related economic activity, which is subject to fluctuations in value due to market price volatility. See "Commodity Price Risk (Non-trading) - Economic Activity" in Note 14 to the Financial Statements. Amounts have been adjusted for insignificant option premiums.

(f)Represents the revenues associated with the hydroelectric generating facilities located in Montana that are classified as discontinued operations. These revenues are not reflected in "Operating Income" on the Statements of Income.

Changes in Non-GAAP Financial Measures


The following table shows the non-GAAP financial measures by PPL's reportable segment and by component, as applicable, for the periodsthree months ended March 31 as well as the change between periods. The factors that gave rise to the changes are described following the table.


   Three Months
   2014  2013  Change
           
Kentucky Regulated         
Kentucky Gross Margins         
 LG&E $ 226  $ 202   24 
 KU   282    256    26 
 LKE $ 508  $ 458   50 
Pennsylvania Regulated         
Pennsylvania Gross Delivery Margins         
 Distribution $ 249  $ 224  $ 25 
 Transmission   73    53    20 
 Total $ 322  $ 277  $ 45 
Supply         
Unregulated Gross Energy Margins         
 Eastern U.S. $ 435  $ 420  $ 15 
 Western U.S.   49    57    (8)
 Total $ 484  $ 477  $ 7 

    Three Months
    2015 2014 $ Change
Kentucky Regulated          
Kentucky Gross Margins          
 LG&E  $ 230 $ 226 $ 4
 KU    292   282   10
LKE  $ 522 $ 508 $ 14
            
Pennsylvania Regulated          
Pennsylvania Gross Delivery Margins          
 Distribution  $ 242 $ 249 $ (7)
 Transmission    93   73   20
Total  $ 335 $ 322 $ 13
            
Supply          
Unregulated Gross Energy Margins          
 Eastern U.S.  $ 405 $ 435 $ (30)
 Western U.S.    21   49   (28)
Total  $ 426 $ 484 $ (58)

Kentucky Gross Margins


Kentucky Gross Margins increased primarily due to higher volumes of $20 million ($5 million at LG&E and $15 million at KU), returns fromon additional environmental capital investments of $13$18 million ($510 million at LG&E and $8 million at KU), and higher demand revenue of $8$7 million ($46 million at both LG&EKU and KU) and higher off-system sales$1 million at LG&E&E) partially offset by lower sales volume of $7 million.$10 million ($6 million at KU and $4 million at LG&E). The change in volumessales volume was primarily attributable to unusually coldmilder winter weather conditions.conditions in 2015 compared to 2014.

93


99


Pennsylvania Gross Delivery Margins


Distribution


Distribution margins increaseddecreased primarily due to a $12 million favorable effectbenefit recorded in the first quarter of unusually cold weather in 2014 andas a $12 million effect due toresult of a change in estimate of a regulatory liability.  See "Pennsylvania Activities - Storm Damage Expense Rider" in Note 6 to the Financial Statements for additional information.


liability partially offset by a $4 million favorable effect of distribution improvement capital investments and a $4 million impact of favorable weather.

Transmission


Transmission margins increased primarily due to increased investment in plant and the recovery of additional costs through the FERC formula-based rates.


capital investments.

Unregulated Gross Energy Margins


Eastern U.S.


Eastern margins decreased primarily due to lower capacity prices of $69 million, unusually cold weather conditions in 2014 as discussed below of $38 million, net change on commodity positions of $28 million and full-requirement sales contracts of $22 million, partially offset by higher baseload energy prices of $75 million and favorable asset performance of $49 million.

During the first quarter of 2014, the PJM region experienced unusually cold weather conditions, higher demand and congestion patterns, that increasedcausing rising natural gas and electricity prices in spot and near-term forward markets. Due to these market conditions,dynamics, PPL Energy Supply captured opportunities on unhedged generation, which were offset primarily offset by under hedgedlosses incurred by under-hedged full-requirement sales contracts and retail electric.  The net benefitelectric portfolios which were not fully hedged or able to be fully hedged given the extreme load conditions and lack of $38 million due to the aforementioned weather and related market dynamics along with $74 million of higher capacity prices was offset by $82 million from lower hedge prices on baseload energy and $32 million driven by lower output from PPL Susquehanna due to the timing of outages.


liquidity.

Western U.S.


Western margins decreased primarily due to lower availabilitythe sale of coal andthe Montana hydroelectric units.


generating facilities in November 2014.

Statement of Income Analysis --  
        
Utility Revenues  
        
The increase (decrease) in utility revenues for the period ended March 31, 20142015 compared with 2013 was due to:
Three Months
Domestic:
PPL Electric (a)$ 79 
LKE (b) 134 
Total Domestic 213 
U.K.:
Price (c) 68 
Foreign currency exchange rates 26 
Volume (d) (24)
Line loss accrual adjustments (e) (65)
Other (6)
Total U.K. (1)
Total$ 212 

(a)See "Pennsylvania Gross Delivery Margins" for further information.
(b)See "Kentucky Gross Margins" for further information.
(c)Due to price increases effective April 1, 2013.
(d)The decrease was primarily due to the unfavorable effect of weather.
(e)Adjustments in 2014 based on Ofgem's final decision on the DPCR4 line loss incentives and penalties.

Certain Operating Revenues and Expenses Included in "Margins"

The following Statement of Income line items and their related increase (decrease) during the period ended March 31, 2014 compared with 2013 are included above within "Margins" and are not discussed separately.

100



Three Months 
Unregulated wholesale energy (a)$ (1,572)
Unregulated retail energy 112 
Fuel 229 
Energy purchases (b) (1,551)

(a)2014 includes significant realized and unrealized losses on physical and financial commodity sales contracts due to the unusually cold weather.
(b)2014 includes significant realized and unrealized gains on physical and financial commodity purchase contracts due to the unusually cold weather.

Other Operation and Maintenance
The increase (decrease) in other operation and maintenance for the period ended March 31, 2014 compared with 2013 was due to:
        
      
Three Months
Domestic:    
 PPL Energy Supply fossil and hydroelectric plantsElectric (a)  $ 20 
PPL Electric PUC-reportable storms 9 
PPL Susquehanna 7 38
 LKE coal plants 5 
LKE storm expenses 5 
LKE adjustments to regulatory assets and liabilities (4)
PPL Electric Act 129 (4)
Other (8)
U.K.:
Network maintenance (b)     9 (35)
 Foreign currency exchange ratesTotal Domestic     4 
Pension (9)
Engineering management (6)
Separation benefits (3)
Other (4)
Total$ 21 

(a)During 2014, PPL Montana determined the Kerr Dam Project was impaired and recorded a charge of $18 million.  See Note 13 to the Financial Statements for additional information.
(b)The increase was primarily due to vegetation management and fault repair due to increased 2014 storm activity.

Depreciation3
        
The increase (decrease) in depreciation for the period ended March 31, 2014 compared with 2013 was due to:
U.K.:    
 Three Months
Price (c)    42
 
Additions to PP&E, netForeign currency exchange rates    $ 18 (48)
OtherVolume    (10)
Line loss accrual adjustments (d)   65
Total U.K. 49
Total  $ 21 52

Taxes, Other Than Income

Taxes, other than income increased by $8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared with 2013, primarily due to higher Pennsylvania gross receipts tax expense as a result of an increase in retail electric revenues.  This tax is included in "Unregulated Gross Energy Margins" and "Pennsylvania Gross Delivery Margins."

Other Income (Expense) - net

The $145 million decrease in other income (expense) - net for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared with 2013 was primarily due to an increase of $143 million from realized and unrealized losses on foreign currency contracts to economically hedge GBP denominated earnings from WPD.

See Note 12 to the Financial Statements for additional information.

101



Interest Expense(a)See "Pennsylvania Gross Delivery Margins" for further information.
(b)See "Kentucky Gross Margins" for further information.
(c)
The increase (decrease) in interest expense for the period ended March 31, 2014 compared with 2013 was due to:
Three Months
Loss on extinguishment of debt (a)$ 9 
Capitalized interest (b) 5 
Other (1)
Total$ 13 to a price increase effective April 1, 2014.

(a)In March(d)The increase was due to unfavorable accrual adjustments in 2014 PPL Capital Funding remarketedbased on Ofgem's final decision on the DPCR4 line loss incentives and exchanged junior subordinated notes that were originally issued in April 2011 as a component of PPL's 2011 Equity Units.penalties. See Note 76 to the Financial Statements for additional information.
(b)Includes interest on the debt component of AFUDC.

Income Taxes
The increase (decrease) in income taxes for the period ended March 31, 2014 compared with 2013 was due to:
Three Months
Change in pre-tax income at current period tax rates$ (57)
Federal income tax credits, excluding foreign tax credit 3 
U.S. income tax on foreign earnings net of foreign tax credit 9 
Other 6 
Total$ (39)

See Note 5 to the Financial Statements for additional information.

PPL Energy Supply:  Earnings, Margins and Statement of Income Analysis

Earnings

         Three Months Ended
         March 31,
         2014  2013 
              
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to PPL Energy Supply Member       $ (66) $ (38)
Special items, gains (losses), after-tax         (149)   (117)

Excluding special items, pre-tax earnings for the three-month period in 2014 compared with 2013 were relatively flat, primarily due to higher capacity prices, net benefits from unusually cold weather and lower interest expense, offset by lower baseload energy prices and the timing of a planned outage at the Susquehanna nuclear power plant.

The table below quantifies the changes in the components of Net Income (Loss) Attributable to PPL Energy Supply Member between these periods, which reflect amounts classified as Unregulated Gross Energy Margins and certain items that management considers special on separate lines within the table and not in their respective Statement of Income line items.  See PPL's "Results of Operations - Segment Earnings - Supply Segment" for the details of special items.

Three Months
Unregulated Gross Energy Margins��$ 7 
Other operation and maintenance (3)
Depreciation (2)
Interest Expense 12 
Income Taxes (10)
Special items, after-tax (32)
Total$ (28)

Margins

"Unregulated Gross Energy Margins" is a non-GAAP financial performance measure that management utilizes as an indicator of the performance of its business.  See PPL's "Results of Operations - Margins" for information on why management believes this measure is useful and for explanations of the underlying drivers of the changes between periods.

102



The following table contains the components from the Statements of Income that are included in this non-GAAP financial measure and a reconciliation to "Operating Income" for the periods ended March 31.

      2014 Three Months 2013 Three Months
      Unregulated       Unregulated      
      Gross Energy    Operating Gross Energy     Operating
      Margins Other (a) Income (b) Margins Other (a) Income (b)
                   
Operating Revenues                    
 Unregulated wholesale energy $ (637)  (792)(c)  (1,429) $ 966   (823)(c)  143 
 Unregulated wholesale energy                    
  to affiliate   27          27    14          14 
 Unregulated retail energy   378    (27)(c)   351    246    (8)(c)   238 
 Energy-related businesses      125     125         113     113 
   Total Operating Revenues   (232)   (694)    (926)   1,226    (718)    508 
                         
Operating Expenses                    
 Fuel   481    1 (c)   482    297    1 (c)   298 
 Energy purchases   (1,219)   (585)(c)   (1,804)   437    (636)(c)   (199)
 Other operation and maintenance   7    251     258    5    230     235 
 Depreciation      80     80         78     78 
 Taxes, other than income   13    8     21    8    9     17 
 Energy-related businesses   2    122     124    2    108     110 
   Total Operating Expenses   (716)   (123)    (839)   749    (210)    539 
Total $ 484  $ (571)  $ (87) $ 477  $ (508)  $ (31)

(a)Represents amounts excluded from Margins.
(b)As reported on the Statements of Income.
(c)Includes energy-related economic activity, which is subject to fluctuations in value due to market price volatility.  See "Commodity Price Risk (Non-trading) - Economic Activity" within Note 14 to the Financial Statements.

Statement of Income Analysis --

Certain Operating Revenues and Expenses Included in "Unregulated Gross Energy Margins"


"Margins"

The following Statement of Income line items and their related increase (decrease) during the period ended March 31, 20142015 compared with 20132014 are included above within "Unregulated Gross Energy Margins""Margins" and are not discussed separately.


  Three Months
    
Unregulated wholesale energy (a) $ (1,572)
Unregulated wholesale energy to affiliate 13 1,978
Unregulated retail energy   113  (38)
Fuel   184  (154)
Energy purchases (b)   (1,605) 1,815
94

(a)2014 includes significant realized and unrealized losses on physical and financial commodity sales contracts due to the unusually cold weather.weather
(b)2014 includes significant realized and unrealized gains on physical and financial commodity purchase contracts due to the unusually cold weather.

Energy-Related Businesses

Net contributions from energy-related businesses increased by $6 million for the period ended March 31, 2015 compared with 2014 primarily due to higher margins on existing construction projects at the mechanical contracting and engineering subsidiaries.

Other Operation and Maintenance    
       
The increase (decrease) in other operation and maintenance for the period ended March 31, 20142015 compared with 20132014 was due to:
Three Months
       
Fossil and hydroelectric plants (a)$ 20 
PPL Susquehanna     7 Three Months
Other (4)
Total$ 23 

(a)During 2014, PPL Montana determined the Kerr Dam was impaired and recorded a charge of $18 million.  See Note 13 for further information.

Taxes, Other Than Income

Taxes, other than income increased by $4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared with 2013, primarily due to higher Pennsylvania gross receipts tax expense as a result of an increase in retail electric revenues.  This tax is included in "Unregulated Gross Energy Margins."

103



Interest ExpenseDomestic:    
 Fossil and hydroelectric plants (a)$ 4
PPL EnergyPlus (b) (9)
PPL Electric storm costs (10)
PPL Electric Act 129 5
External transition costs associated with the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply 4
Uncollectible accounts 3
Other 9
U.K.:
Network maintenance (5)
Foreign currency exchange rates (7)
Pension (4)
Engineering management 9
WPD Midlands acquisition-related adjustment (3)
Other 4
Total$

(a)The increase was primarily due to costs related to the retirement of the Corette plant in March 2015.
(b)The decrease was primarily due to lower labor costs attributable to restructuring activities.

Depreciation

Depreciation decreased by $7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared with 2014, primarily due to a $20 million reduction from an extension of the WPD network asset lives partially offset by additions to PP&E, net. See Note 2 to the Financial Statements for additional information on the extension of WPD network asset lives.

Other Income (Expense) - net

Other income (expense) - net increased by $118 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared with 2014, primarily due to an increase of $112 million from realized and unrealized gains on foreign currency contracts to economically hedge GBP denominated earnings from WPD.

See Note 12 to the Financial Statements for additional information.

Interest Expense
      
The increase (decrease) in interest expense for the period ended March 31, 20142015 compared with 20132014 was due to:
      
    Three Months
      
Loss on extinguishment of debt (a)  $ (9)
Long-term debt interest expense (a)Foreign currency exchange rates    $ (14)(7)
Other     2 1
Total  $ (12)(15)

(a)The decrease was due to debt maturitiesIn March 2014, PPL Capital Funding remarketed and exchanged junior subordinated notes that were originally issued in July and December 2013.April 2011 as a component of PPL's 2011 Equity Units.

Income Taxes  
      
The increase (decrease) in income taxes for the period ended March 31, 20142015 compared with 20132014 was due to:
     
95
 

    Three Months
      
Change in pre-tax income at current period tax rates  $ (18)165
Federal income tax creditsValuation allowance adjustments    3
U.S. income tax on foreign earnings net of foreign tax credit   (12)
Intercompany interest on U.K. financing entities (6)
Impact of lower U.K. income tax rates 6
Other     2 (2)
Total  $ (14)154

See Note 5 to the Financial Statements for additional information.


Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations (net of income taxes)

Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations (net of income taxes) for the three months ended March 31, 2014 includes the results of operations of the Montana hydroelectric generating facilities, which were sold in November 2014. See "Discontinued Operations - Montana Hydro Sale" in Note 8 to the Financial Statements for additional information.

PPL Electric: Earnings, Margins and Statement of Income Analysis


Earnings       
    Three Months Ended
    March 31,
    2015 2014
         
Net Income  $ 87 $ 85

Earnings

     Three Months Ended
         March 31,
       2014  2013 
              
Net Income       $ 85  $ 64 

Pre-tax earnings increased slightly for the three-monththree month period in 20142015 compared with 2013 increased2014 primarily due to higher transmission margins from additional transmission capital investments, partially offset by higher distribution margins due to unusually cold weather, and a benefitdepreciation expense. The first quarter of 2014 also benefited from a change in estimate of a regulatory liability.

The table below quantifies the changes in the components of Net Income between these periods, which reflectreflects amounts classified as Pennsylvania Gross Delivery Margins on a separate line within the table and not in their respective Statement of Income line items.


   Three Months
     
Pennsylvania Gross Delivery Margins  $ 13
Other operation and maintenance $ 45  2
Depreciation     (2)
Interest Expense (4)(6)
Other    1
Income TaxesInterest expense    (2)
Income taxes  (19) (6)
Total  $ 21 2

Margins


"Pennsylvania Gross Delivery Margins" is a non-GAAP financial performance measure that management utilizes as an indicator of the performance of its business. See PPL's "Results of Operations - Margins" for information on why management believes this measure is useful and for explanations of the underlying drivers of the changes between periods.


The following table containstables contain the components from the Statements of Income that are included in this non-GAAP financial measure and a reconciliation to "Operating Income" for the periods ended March 31.


     2015 Three Months 2014 Three Months
     PA Gross      PA Gross     
     Delivery   Operating Delivery    Operating
     Margins Other (a) Income (b) Margins Other (a) Income (b)
Operating Revenues$ 630    $ 630 $ 592    $ 592
                      
Operating Expenses                 
 Energy purchases  227      227   189      189
 Energy purchases from affiliate  9      9   27      27
 Other operation and maintenance  26 $ 107   133   25 $ 109   134
 Depreciation     51   51      45   45
 Taxes, other than income  33   2   35   29   3   32
   Total Operating Expenses  295   160   455   270   157   427
Total   $ 335 $ (160) $ 175 $ 322 $ (157) $ 165
104



      2014 Three Months 2013 Three Months
      PA Gross      PA Gross     
      Delivery   Operating Delivery    Operating
      Margins Other (a) Income (b) Margins Other (a) Income (b)
                 
Operating Revenues $ 592       $ 592  $ 513       $ 513 
                       
Operating Expenses                  
 Energy purchases   189         189    172         172 
 Energy purchases from affiliate   27       27    14       14 
 Other operation and maintenance   25  $ 109    134    22  $ 111    133 
 Depreciation        45    45       43    43 
 Taxes, other than income   29    3    32    28    2    30 
   Total Operating Expenses   270    157    427    236    156    392 
Total $ 322  $ (157) $ 165  $ 277  $ (156) $ 121 

96

(a)Represents amounts excluded from Margins.
(b)As reported on the Statements of Income.

Statement of Income Analysis --


Certain Operating Revenues and Expenses Included in "Pennsylvania Gross Delivery Margins"


"Margins"

The following Statement of Income line items and their related increase (decrease) during the period ended March 31, 20142015 compared with 20132014 are included above within "Pennsylvania Gross Delivery Margins""Margins" and are not discussed separately.


  Three Months
    
Operating revenues $ 79 38
Energy purchases   17  38
Energy purchases from affiliate   13  (18)

Other Operation and Maintenance    
      
The increase (decrease) in other operation and maintenance for the period ended March 31, 20142015 compared with 20132014 was due to:
   
    Three Months
      
     
PUC-reportable storms$ 9 
Vegetation management  $ (2)
Storm costs   (10)
Act 129     (4)5
Payroll-relatedUncollectible accounts 3
Corporate service costs     (3)
Other (4)3
Total  $ (1)

Interest Expense

Interest expense

Depreciation

Depreciation increased by $4$6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014,2015 compared with 2013,2014, primarily due to a debt issuance in July 2013.


transmission PP&E additions, net as well as additions related to the ongoing efforts to ensure the reliability of the delivery system and the replacement of aging infrastructure.

Income Taxes    
     
The increase (decrease) in income taxes for the period ended March 31, 20142015 compared with 20132014 was due to:
     
   Three Months
     
Change in pre-tax income at current period tax rates  $ 17 5
Other     3 1
Total  $ 20 6

See Note 5 to5to the Financial Statements for additional information.


105



LKE: Earnings, Margins and Statement of Income Analysis


Earnings
    Three Months Ended
    March 31,
    2015 2014
         
Net Income  $ 117 $ 115

Earnings


         Three Months Ended
     March 31,
       2014  2013 
              
Net Income       $ 115  $ 96 
Special items, gains (losses), after-tax              1 

Excluding special items, earnings increased slightly for the three-monththree month period in 20142015 compared with 2013 increased2014 primarily due to higher volumes, returns fromon additional environmental capital investments and higher demand revenue partially offset by lower sales volume, higher depreciation expense and off-system sales.higher income tax expense. The change in volumessales volume was primarily attributable to unusually coldmilder winter weather conditions.

conditions in 2015 compared to 2014.

The table below quantifies the changes in the components of Net Income between these periods, which reflect amounts classified as Margins andon a certain item that management considers special on separate linesline within the table and not in their respective Statement of Income line items.  See PPL's "Results of Operations - Segment Earnings - Kentucky Regulated segment" for details of the special item.

97

   Three Months
     
Margins  $ 50 14
Other operation and maintenance     (11)(2)
Depreciation     (2)
Taxes, other than income (1)(4)
Other Income (Expense)- net    1
Interest ExpenseIncome taxes     (5)
Income Taxes (12)
Special item - EEI adjustments, after-tax (1)(7)
Total  $ 19 2

Margins


"Margins" is a non-GAAP financial performance measure that management utilizes as an indicator of the performance of its business. See PPL's "Results of Operations - Margins" for an explanation of why management believes this measure is useful and the underlying drivers of the changes between periods. Within PPL's discussion, LKE's Margins are referred to as "Kentucky Gross Margins."


The following tables contain the components from the Statements of Income that are included in this non-GAAP financial measure and a reconciliation to "Operating Income" for the periods ended March 31.


      2014 Three Months  2013 Three Months
          Operating       Operating
      Margins Other (a) Income (b)  Margins Other (a) Income (b)
                  
Operating Revenues $ 934        934   $ 800        800 
Operating Expenses                   
 Fuel   277         277     231         231 
 Energy purchases   124         124     86         86 
 Other operation and maintenance   23   183    206     25   172    197 
 Depreciation   2    84    86          82    82 
 Taxes, other than income        13    13          12    12 
   Total Operating Expenses   426    280    706     342    266    608 
Total $ 508  $ (280) $ 228   $ 458  $ (266) $ 192 

      2015 Three Months  2014 Three Months
          Operating       Operating
      Margins Other (a) Income (b)  Margins Other (a) Income (b)
                  
Operating Revenues $ 899    $ 899  $ 934    $ 934
                        
Operating Expenses                   
 Fuel   253      253    277      277
 Energy purchases   92      92    124      124
 Other operation and maintenance   24 $ 185   209    23 $ 183   206
 Depreciation   7   88   95    2   84   86
 Taxes, other than income   1   13   14       13   13
   Total Operating Expenses   377   286   663    426   280   706
Total    $ 522 $ (286) $ 236  $ 508 $ (280) $ 228

(a)Represents amounts excluded from Margins.
(b)As reported on the Statements of Income.

Statement of Income Analysis --


Certain Operating Revenues and Expenses Includedincluded in "Margins"


The following Statement of Income line items and their related increase (decrease)decrease during the period ended March 31, 20142015 compared with 20132014 are included above within "Margins" and are not discussed separately.


106



Three Months 
    
Operating Revenues$ 134 
Fuel 46 
Energy purchases 38 

Other Operation and MaintenanceThree Months
      
The increase (decrease) in other operation and maintenance expense for the period ended March 31, 2014 compared with 2013 was due to:
Operating revenues  Three Months$ 35
Fuel    24
Coal plants$ 5 
Storm expensesEnergy purchases     5 
Adjustments to regulatory assets and liabilities (4)
Bad debt expense 3 
Total$ 9 32

Interest Expense
The increase (decrease) in interest expense for the period ended March 31, 2014, compared with 2013, was due to:
Three Months
Issuance of $500 million First Mortgage Bonds during the fourth quarter of 2013$ 6 
Other (1)
Total$ 5 

Income Taxes

Income taxes

Depreciation

Depreciation increased by $12$9 million for the three months ended March 31, 20142015 compared with 20132014 primarily due to higher pre-tax income.


See Note 5additions to PP&E, net.

Income Taxes

Income taxes increased by $7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared with 2014 due to the Financial Statements for additional information.change in pre-tax income of $4 million and the establishment of a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset of $3 million.

98

LG&E: Earnings, Margins and Statement of Income Analysis


Earnings
    Three Months Ended
    March 31,
    2015 2014
         
Net Income  $ 53 $ 52

Earnings


         Three Months Ended
     March 31,
       2014  2013 
              
Net Income       $ 52  $ 44 

Earnings increased slightly for the three-monththree month period in 20142015 compared with 2013 increased2014 primarily due to higher volumes, returns fromon additional environmental capital investments demand revenuepartially offset by lower sales volume and off-system sales.higher depreciation expense. The change in volumessales volume was primarily attributable to unusually coldmilder winter weather conditions.

conditions in 2015 compared to 2014.

The table below quantifies the changes in the components of Net Income between these periods, which reflect amounts classified as Margins on a separate line within the table and not in their respective Statement of Income line items.


   Three Months
     
Margins  $ 24 4
Other operation and maintenance     (7)2
Depreciation     (1)(2)
Other Income (Expense) - net     (1)1
Interest Expenseexpense     (2)(1)
Income Taxestaxes     (5)(3)
Total  $ 1


107


Margins


"Margins" is a non-GAAP financial performance measure that management utilizes as an indicator of the performance of its business. See PPL's "Results of Operations - Margins" for an explanation of why management believes this measure is useful and the underlying drivers of the changes between periods. Within PPL's discussion, LG&E's Margins are included in "Kentucky Gross Margins."


The following tables contain the components from the Statements of Income that are included in this non-GAAP financial measure and a reconciliation to "Operating Income" for the periods ended March 31.


      2014 Three Months  2013 Three Months
          Operating       Operating
      Margins Other (a) Income (b)  Margins Other (a) Income (b)
                  
Operating Revenues $ 479        479   $ 390        390 
Operating Expenses                   
 Fuel   117         117     96         96 
 Energy purchases, including affiliate   124         124     81         81 
 Other operation and maintenance   11  $ 87    98     11   80    91 
 Depreciation   1    37    38          36    36 
 Taxes, other than income        6    6          6    6 
   Total Operating Expenses   253    130    383     188   122   310 
Total $ 226  $ (130) $ 96   $ 202  $ (122) $ 80 

      2015 Three Months  2014 Three Months
          Operating       Operating
      Margins Other (a) Income (b)  Margins Other (a) Income (b)
                    
Operating Revenues $ 439    $ 439  $ 479    $ 479
                        
Operating Expenses                   
 Fuel   103      103    117      117
 Energy purchases, including affiliate   91      91    124      124
 Other operation and maintenance   11 $ 85   96    11 $ 87   98
 Depreciation   3   39   42    1   37   38
 Taxes, other than income   1   6   7       6   6
   Total Operating Expenses   209   130   339    253  130   383
Total    $ 230 $ (130) $ 100  $ 226 $ (130) $ 96

(a)Represents amounts excluded from Margins.
(b)As reported on the Statements of Income.

Statement of Income Analysis --


Certain Operating Revenues and Expenses Includedincluded in "Margins"


The following Statement of Income line items and their related increase (decrease)decrease during the period ended March 31, 20142015 compared with 20132014 are included above within "Margins" and are not discussed separately.

99

  Three Months
    
Retail and wholesale $ 73 25
Electric revenue from affiliate   16  15
Fuel   21  14
Energy purchases   38  30
Energy purchases from affiliate    3

Other Operation and Maintenance
The increase (decrease) in other operation and maintenance expense for the period ended March 31, 2014 compared with 2013 was due to:
Three Months
Coal plants$ 2 
Storm expenses 4 
Other 1 
Total$ 7 

Income Taxes

Income taxes

Depreciation

Depreciation increased by $5$4 million for the three months ended March 31, 20142015 compared with 20132014 primarily due to higher pre-tax income.


See Note 5additions to the Financial Statements for additional information.

108



PP&E, net.

KU: Earnings, Margins and Statement of Income Analysis


Earnings
    Three Months Ended
    March 31,
    2015 2014
         
Net Income  $ 78 $ 77

Earnings


         Three Months Ended
     March 31,
       2014  2013 
              
Net Income       $ 77  $ 64 
Special items, gains (losses), after-tax              1 

Excluding special items, earnings increased slightly for the three-monththree month period in 20142015 compared with 2013 increased2014 primarily due to higher volumes, returns fromon additional environmental capital investments and higher demand revenue.revenue partially offset by lower sales volume, higher expenses related to scheduled maintenance outages and higher depreciation expense. The change in volumessales volume was primarily attributable to unusually coldmilder winter weather conditions.

conditions in 2015 compared to 2014.

The table below quantifies the changes in the components of Net Income between these periods, which reflect amounts classified as Margins andon a certain item that management considers special on separate linesline within the table and not in their respective Statement of Income line items.  See PPL's "Results of Operations - Segment Earnings - Kentucky Regulated segment" for details of the special item.


   Three Months
     
Margins  $ 26 10
Other operation and maintenance     (3)(5)
Depreciation     (1)(2)
Taxes, other than incomeOther Income (Expense)- net    (1)
Other Income (Expense) - net 2 
Interest Expense (2)
Income Taxes (7)
Special item - EEI adjustments, after-taxtaxes    (1)
Total  $ 13 1

Margins


"Margins" is a non-GAAP financial performance measure that management utilizes as an indicator of the performance of its business. See PPL's "Results of Operations - Margins" for an explanation of why management believes this measure is useful and the underlying drivers of the changes between periods. Within PPL's discussion, KU's Margins are included in "Kentucky Gross Margins."


The following tables contain the components from the Statements of Income that are included in this non-GAAP financial measure and a reconciliation to "Operating Income" for the periods ended March 31.


      2014 Three Months  2013 Three Months
          Operating       Operating
      Margins Other (a) Income (b)  Margins Other (a) Income (b)
                  
Operating Revenues $ 498        498   $ 432        432 
Operating Expenses                   
 Fuel   160         160     135         135 
 Energy purchases, including affiliate   43         43     27         27 
 Other operation and maintenance   12   86    98     14   83    97 
 Depreciation   1    47    48          46    46 
 Taxes, other than income        7    7          6    6 
   Total Operating Expenses   216    140    356     176    135    311 
Total $ 282  $ (140) $ 142   $ 256  $ (135) $ 121 

      2015 Three Months  2014 Three Months
          Operating       Operating
      Margins Other (a) Income (b)  Margins Other (a) Income (b)
                  
Operating Revenues $ 485    $ 485  $ 498    $ 498
                        
Operating Expenses                   
 Fuel   150      150    160      160
 Energy purchases, including affiliate   26      26    43      43
 Other operation and maintenance   13 $ 91   104    12 $ 86   98
 Depreciation   4   49   53    1   47   48
 Taxes, other than income      7   7       7   7
   Total Operating Expenses   193   147   340    216   140   356
Total    $ 292 $ (147) $ 145  $ 282 $ (140) $ 142

(a)Represents amounts excluded from Margins.
(b)As reported on the Statements of Income.
100

Statement of Income Analysis --


Certain Operating Revenues and Expenses Includedincluded in "Margins"


The following Statement of Income line items and their related increase (decrease)decrease during the period ended March 31, 20142015 compared with 20132014 are included above within "Margins" and are not discussed separately.


109



  Three Months
    
Retail and wholesale $ 61 10
Electric revenue from affiliate    3
Fuel   25  10
Energy purchases 2
Energy purchases from affiliate   16  15

Income Taxes

Income taxes

Other Operation and Maintenance
The increase (decrease) in other operation and maintenance expense for the period ended March 31, 2015 compared with 2014 was due to:
Three Months
Timing and scope of generation maintenance$ 2
Pension 3
Storm expenses (2)
Other 3
Total$ 6

Depreciation

Depreciation increased by $7$5 million for the three months ended March 31, 20142015 compared with 20132014 primarily due to higher pre-tax income.


See Note 5additions to the Financial Statements for additional information.

Financial Condition
                   
The remainder of this Item 2 in this Form 10-Q is presented on a combined basis, providing information, as applicable,
for all Registrants.
                   
Liquidity and Capital Resources
                   
(All Registrants)
                   
The Registrants had the following at:
     PPL            
  PPL (a) Energy Supply PPL Electric LKE LG&E KU
March 31, 2014                  
Cash and cash equivalents $ 1,256  $ 441  $ 42  $ 30  $ 9  $ 21 
Notes receivable from affiliates                4       
Short-term debt   1,579    970    60    200    15    110 
                   
December 31, 2013                  
Cash and cash equivalents $ 1,102  $ 239  $ 25  $ 35  $ 8  $ 21 
Notes receivable from affiliates         150    70       
Short-term debt   701         20    245    20    150 

PP&E, net.

Financial Condition
                
The remainder of this Item 2 in this Form 10-Q is presented on a combined basis, providing information, as applicable, for all Registrants.
                
Liquidity and Capital Resources
                
(All Registrants)
                
The Registrants had the following at:
                
  PPL (a) PPL Electric LKE LG&E KU
March 31, 2015               
Cash and cash equivalents $ 1,335 $ 35 $ 40 $ 17 $ 23
Short-term investments   135            
Short-term debt   1,595   85   484   216   193
Notes payable with affiliates         40      
                
December 31, 2014               
Cash and cash equivalents $ 1,751 $ 214 $ 21 $ 10 $ 11
Short-term investments   120            
Short-term debt   1,466      575   264   236
Notes payable with affiliates         41      

(a)At March 31, 2014, $6882015, $416 million of cash and cash equivalents were denominated in GBP.  If these amounts would be remitted as dividends, PPL may be subject to additionalwould not anticipate a material incremental U.S. taxes, net of allowable foreign tax credits.cost.  Historically, dividends paid by foreign subsidiaries have been limited to distributions of the current year's earnings.  See Note 5 to the Financial Statements in PPL's 20132014 Form 10-K for additional information on undistributed earnings of WPD.

Net cash provided by (used in) operating, investing and financing activities for the three-month periodsthree month period ended March 31, and the changes between periods, were as follows.

101

     PPL Energy            
  PPL Supply PPL Electric LKE LG&E KU
2014                   
Operating activities $ 931  $ 276  $ (4) $ 309  $ 148  $ 191 
Investing activities   (1,183)   (389)   (42)   (205)   (115)   (154)
Financing activities   392    315    63    (109)   (32)   (37)
                   
2013                   
Operating activities $ 244  $ 125  $ (77) $ 85  $ 85  $ 85 
Investing activities   (899)   (195)   (192)   (267)   (94)   (172)
Financing activities   621    (196)   160    191    21    82 
                   
Change  - Cash Provided (Used):                  
Operating activities $ 687  $ 151  $ 73  $ 224  $ 63  $ 106 
Investing activities   (284)   (194)   150    62    (21)   18 
Financing activities   (229)   511    (97)   (300)   (53)   (119)

  PPL PPL Electric LKE LG&E KU
2015               
Operating activities $ 673 $ (45) $ 451 $ 251 $ 229
Investing activities   (990)   (225)   (317)   (173)   (144)
Financing activities   (97)   91   (115)   (71)   (73)
                
2014               
Operating activities $ 931 $ (4) $ 310 $ 149 $ 191
Investing activities   (1,183)   (42)   (206)   (116)   (154)
Financing activities   392   63   (109)   (32)   (37)
                
Change  - Cash Provided (Used)               
Operating activities $ (258) $ (41) $ 141 $ 102 $ 38
Investing activities   193   (183)   (111)   (57)   10
Financing activities   (489)   28   (6)   (39)   (36)

Operating Activities


The components of the change in cash provided by (used in) operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 20142015 compared with 20132014 were as follows.


110



        PPL Energy            
     PPL Supply PPL Electric LKE LG&E KU
                      
Change - Cash Provided (Used):                  
  Net income $ (97) $ (28) $ 21  $ 19  $ 8  $ 13 
  Non-cash components   92    (69)   (34)   21    (7)   (10)
  Working capital   299    146    8    59    28    31 
  Defined benefit funding   294    75    69    116    34    57 
  Other operating activities   99    27    9    9         15 
 Total $ 687  $ 151  $ 73  $ 224  $ 63  $ 106 

                   
     PPL PPL Electric LKE LG&E KU
                   
Change - Cash Provided (Used)               
  Net income $ 331 $ 2 $ 2 $ 1 $ 1
  Non-cash components   (255)      31   50   15
  Working capital   (171)   (31)   126   68   37
  Defined benefit plan funding   (136)   (14)   (15)   (13)   (12)
  Other operating activities   (27)   2   (3)   (4)   (3)
Total $ (258) $ (41) $ 141 $ 102 $ 38

(PPL)


PPL's changes

PPL had a $258 million decrease in non-cash components of net income included non-cash hedging losses of $143cash provided by operating activities in 2015 compared with 2014.

·Net income improved by $331 million between the periods. However, this included an additional $255 million of net non-cash benefits, including a $331 million decrease in unrealized losses on hedging activities, which was partially offset by a $150 million increase in deferred income tax expense. The net $76 million increase from net income and non-cash components in 2015 compared with 2014 reflects higher revenues in the U.K. and higher margins in the Pennsylvania and Kentucky regulated segments.

·The $171 million decrease in cash from changes in working capital was primarily due to decreases in accounts payable, in part due to lower swaps payable and the impact of market price changes on electric trading and timing of payments. The decrease also reflects lower taxes payable and other current liabilities. These cash outflows were partially offset by the positive impact of lower unbilled revenues.

·Defined benefit plan funding was $136 million higher in 2015.

(PPL Electric)

PPL Electric had a $41 million and a $65 million charge in 2014 to adjust WPD's line loss accrual.  These non-cash charges were partially offset by $106 million of deferred income tax benefits.  The increase in cash from changesused in components of working capital was primarily due to an increase of $231operating activities in 2015 compared with 2014.

·Net income improved by $2 million between the periods. There was no change in net non-cash components of net income.

·The $31 million decline in cash from changes in working capital was partially due to a decrease in accounts payable with affiliates (primarily due to lower federal income taxes payable to PPL) partially offset by a decrease in accounts receivable.

·Defined benefit plan funding was $14 million higher in 2015.

(LKE)

LKE had a $141 million in accounts payable (partially due to increases in power swap payables); along with positive changes totaling $154 million in counterparty collateral, fuel, material and supplies, and prepayments.  These positive impacts on cash were partially offset by an increase of $170 million in unbilled revenue (primarily related to increases in power swap sales).


(PPL Energy Supply)

PPL Energy Supply's changes in non-cash components of net income included $100 million of deferred income tax benefits.  The increase in cash from changesprovided by operating activities in components of working capital was primarily due to an increase of $2472015 compared with 2014.

102
·LKE's non-cash components of net income included a $9 million increase in depreciation expense due to additional assets in service since the first quarter of 2014, a $1 million increase in deferred income taxes primarily due to an increase in accelerated depreciation over book depreciation of $34 million, partially offset by a decrease in utilization of Federal net operating losses of $36 million, and a net $21 million change in regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities due to the timing of rate recovery mechanisms.
·The increase in cash from working capital was driven primarily by a decrease in income tax receivable as a result of receiving payment from PPL for the use of excess tax depreciation deductions in 2014, a decrease in coal inventory due to fewer purchases and a decrease in natural gas stored underground due to increased withdrawals, partially offset by a decrease in accounts payable due to the timing of fuel purchases.

(LG&E)

LG&E had a $102 million in accounts payable (partially due to increases in power swap payables) and a reduction of $66 million in returns of counterparty collateral, partially offset by increases of $215 million in unbilled revenue (primarily related to increases in power swap sales).


(PPL Electric)

PPL Electric's changes in non-cash components of net income included $20 million of deferred income tax benefits.  The small increase in cash from changesprovided by operating activities in components of working capital was primarily due to an increase of $562015 compared with 2014.

·LG&E's non-cash components of net income included a $4 million increase in depreciation expense due to additional assets in service since the first quarter of 2014, a $25 million increase in deferred income taxes primarily due to an increase in accelerated depreciation over book depreciation of $18 million, in accounts payable, partially offset by an increase of $33 million in prepayments and a net $18 million increase in regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities due to the timing of rate recovery mechanisms.
·The increase in cash from working capital was driven primarily by a decrease in income tax receivable as a result of receiving payment from LKE for the use of excess tax depreciation deductions in 2014, a decrease in accounts receivable from affiliates due to timing of intercompany settlements associated with capital expenditures and inventory, a decrease in coal inventory due to fewer purchases and a decrease in natural gas stored underground due to increased withdrawals, partially offset by a decrease in accounts payable due to the timing of fuel purchases.

(KU)

KU had a decrease of $24 million in taxes payable.


(LKE)

LKE's non-cash components of net income included a $29$38 million increase in deferred income taxes primarily due to utilization of netcash provided by operating losses.  The increaseactivities in cash from changes in components of working capital was driven primarily by the change in accounts receivables and unbilled revenues due to weather and rate changes. 

(LG&E)

LG&E's increase in cash from changes in components of working capital was driven primarily by the change in accounts receivables and unbilled revenues due to weather and rate changes and lower fuel inventory and gas storage inventory due to the unusually cold weather in2015 compared with 2014.

(KU)

KU's increase in cash from changes in components of working capital was driven primarily by the change in accounts receivables and unbilled revenues due to weather and rate changes.

·KU's non-cash components of net income included a $5 million increase in depreciation expense due to additional assets in service since the first quarter of 2014 and a $9 million increase in deferred income taxes primarily due to an increase in accelerated depreciation over book depreciation of $16 million, offset by a $6 million Federal net operating loss accrual.
·The increase in cash from working capital was driven primarily by a decrease in income tax receivable as a result of receiving payments from LKE for the use of excess tax depreciation deductions in 2014, and a decrease in coal inventory due to fewer purchases, partially offset by a decrease in accounts payable due to the timing of fuel purchases and a decrease in accounts payable to affiliates due to timing of intercompany settlements associated with capital expenditures and inventory.

Investing Activities

(All Registrants)


Investing Activities

Expenditures for Property, Plant and Equipment


The primary use of cash within investing activities is expenditures for PP&E. The change in these expenditures for the three months ended March 31, 20142015 compared with 20132014 was as follows.


111



     PPL Energy            
  PPL Supply PPL Electric LKE LG&E KU
                   
(Increase) Decrease $ (64) $ 36  $ (12) $ (1) $ (18) $ 18 

  PPL PPL Electric LKE LG&E KU
                
(Increase) Decrease $ (50) $ (23) $ (49) $ (57) $ 6

The increase in expenditures for PP&E for PPL was primarily due to system reliability projectsthe changes in project expenditures at PPL Electric, LG&E and KU, partially offset by lower expenditures at WPD. The decreaseincrease in expenditures atfor PPL Energy SupplyElectric was partiallyprimarily due to expenditures madeincreases in 2013expenditures for the Holtwood hydroelectric expansionNortheast Pocono reliability project, smart grid projects and other various projects, partially offset by the near completion of the Susquehanna-Roseland transmission project. The increase in expenditures for LG&E was primarily due to environmental air projects at LG&E's Mill Creek plant, and gas service riser projects, partially offset by lower expenditures for the construction of Cane Run Unit 7. The decrease in expenditures for KU was related to lower expenditures for the construction of Cane Run Unit 7 and coal combustion residualsCCR projects at KU's Ghent and E.W. Brown plants, partially offset by higher expenditures for environmental air projects at KU's Ghent and E.W. Brown plants.

103

Other Significant Changes in Components of Investing Activities


For PPL, and PPL Energy Supply, the change in cash provided by (used in) investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 20142015 compared with 2013 was negatively impacted primarily by increases2014 reflects decreases of $282 million and $285$324 million in additional cash restricted cash and cash equivalents.  These changes were primarily related to increased cashfor collateral requirements in 2014 to support PPL Energy Supply's commodity hedging programprogram. This was primarily due to an increase in 2014forward prices in forward prices.  the three months ended March 31, 2014.

PPL Energy Supply's restricted cash and cash equivalents for collateral deposits increased by $343also had investing inflows of $56 million in 2014.  To fund these increased collateral requirements, PPL Energy Supply borrowed under its short-term credit facilities.


For PPL Electric, the change in cash provided by (used in) investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared with 2013 was positively impacted primarily from aU.S. Department of Treasury grants for the Rainbow hydroelectric expansion projects.

PPL Electric received $150 million repayment in 2014 of notes receivable from affiliates.


For LKE, the change in cash provided by (used in) investing activities forduring the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared with 2013 was positively impacted primarily from a $66 million repayment in 2014 ofon notes receivable from affiliates.

Financing Activities


(All Registrants)

The components of the change in cash provided by (used in) financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 20142015 compared with 20132014 was as follows.


      PPL Energy            
   PPL Supply PPL Electric LKE LG&E KU
                    
Change - Cash Provided (Used):                  
 Long-term debt issuances/retirements, net $ (681)      $ (10)               
 Dividends   (24)      (7)    $ (8) $ (24)
 Capital contributions/distributions, net      $ (341)   5  $ (135)   (25)   (10)
 Change in short-term debt, net   462    845    (85)   (165)   (20)   (85)
 Other financing activities   14    7                     
Total $ (229) $ 511  $ (97) $ (300) $ (53) $ (119)

The

   PPL PPL Electric LKE LG&E KU
Change - Cash Provided (Used)               
 Long-term debt issuances/retirements, net $ 238 $ 10         
 Stock issuances/redemptions, net   20            
 Dividends   (16)   (12)    $ 4 $ 7
 Capital contributions/distributions, net      (15) $ 41      (40)
 Change in short-term debt, net   (745)   45   (46)   (43)   (3)
 Other financing activities   14      (1)      
 Total $ (489) $ 28 $ (6) $ (39) $ (36)

For the three months ended March 31, 2015, PPL required $489 million less cash provided by changes in short-term debt for PPL and PPL Energy Supply was partiallyfrom financing activities primarily due to borrowings in 2014 by PPL Energy Supply to satisfylower cash collateral requirements to support itsPPL Energy Supply's commodity hedging program (as described in "Investing Activities" above) and $228 million that funded the principal reduction associated with the remarketing of the 2011 Equity Units.  PPL expectsability to use a portioncash from operating activities and cash-on-hand to support the significant capital expenditure programs of its subsidiaries.

For the three months ended March 31, 2015, PPL Electric required $28 million more cash from financing activities. In the first quarter of 2014, PPL Electric financed its capital expenditures program with proceeds from a $150 million note with an affiliate. In the settlement of the 2011 Purchase Contracts to repay outstanding short-term debt in the secondfirst quarter of 2014.


2015, PPL Electric financed its capital expenditures program with cash-on-hand and additional short-term debt.

See Note 7 to the Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q for information on 20142015 short and long-term debt activity, equity transactions and PPL dividends. See the Registrants' 20132014 Form 10-K for information on 20132014 activity.


Credit Facilities


The Registrants maintain credit facilities to enhance liquidity, provide credit support and provide a backstop to commercial paper programs. Amounts borrowed under these credit facilities are reflected in "Short-term debt" on the Balance Sheets. At March 31, 2014,2015, the total committed borrowing capacity and the use of that capacity under these credit facilities was as follows.



112


follows:

External (All Registrants)

         Letters of   
         Credit   
         and   
   Committed   Commercial Unused
   Capacity Borrowed Paper Issued Capacity
          
PPL Capital Funding Credit Facilities $ 750    $ 32 $ 718
PPL Energy Supply Credit Facility   3,000 $ 600   267   2,133
PPL Electric Credit Facility   300      86   214
              
LKE Credit Facility   75   75      
LG&E Credit Facility   500      216   284
KU Credit Facilities   598      391   207
Total LKE   1,173   75   607   491
 Total U.S. Credit Facilities (a) $ 5,223 $ 675 $ 992 $ 3,556
              
Total U.K. Credit Facilities (b) £ 1,055 £ 277    £ 778

         Letters of   
         Credit   
         and   
   Committed   Commercial Unused
   Capacity Borrowed Paper Issued Capacity
          
PPL Capital Funding Credit Facilities $ 450  $185     $ 265 
PPL Energy Supply Credit Facilities   3,150    350  $ 821    1,979 
PPL Electric Credit Facility   300         61    239 
              
LKE Credit Facility   75    75         
LG&E Credit Facility   500         15    485 
KU Credit Facilities   598         308    290 
Total LKE   1,173    75    323    775 
 Total U.S. Credit Facilities (a) $ 5,073  $ 610  $ 1,205  $ 3,258 
              
Total U.K. Credit Facilities (b) £ 1,055  £ 98       £ 957 

104

(a)The commitments under the U.S. credit facilities are provided by a diverse bank group, with no one bank and its affiliates providing an aggregate commitment of more than the following percentages of the total committed capacity: PPL - 10%, PPL Energy Supply - 10%7%, PPL Electric - 6%7%, LKE - 12%21%, LG&E - 6%7% and KU - 22%37%.
(b)The amountamounts borrowed at March 31, 2014 was a2015 were USD-denominated borrowingborrowings of $164$200 million and GPB-denominated borrowings which equated to $226 million. At March 31, 2014,2015, the USD equivalent of unused capacity under the U.K. committed credit facilities was $1.6$1.2 billion.

The commitments under the U.K. credit facilities are provided by a diverse bank group, with no one bank providing more than 13%14% of the total committed capacity.

As a result of the proposed spinoff transaction, PPL Energy Supply has syndicated a $1.85 billion credit facility which is currently fully committed. This syndicated credit facility will replace the existing $3 billion PPL Energy Supply syndicated credit facility and will be effective upon closing of the spinoff transaction. See "Overview - Business Strategy" and "Financial and Operational Developments - Other Financial and Operational Developments - Anticipated Spinoff of PPL Energy Supply" above for additional information.

See Note 7 to the Financial Statements for further discussion of the Registrants' credit facilities.


Intercompany (All Registrants except PPL)

  Committed    Unused
  Capacity Borrowed Capacity
          
PPL Energy Supply Credit Facility $200     $200 
PPL Electric Credit Facility  100      100 
LKE Credit Facility  225      225 
LG&E Money Pool (a)  500      500 
KU Money Pool (a)  500      500 
(LKE, LG&E and KU)

  Committed   Other Used Unused
  Capacity Borrowed Capacity Capacity
             
             
LKE Credit Facility $ 225 $ 40    $ 185
LG&E Money Pool (a)   500    $ 216   284
KU Money Pool (a)   500      193   307

(a)LG&E and KU participate in an intercompany money pool agreement whereby LKE, LG&E and/or KU make available funds up to $500 million at an interest rate based on a market index of commercial paper issues. However, the FERC has issued a maximum short-term debt limit for each utility at $500 million from any source.

See Note 11 to the Financial Statements for further discussion of intercompany credit facilities.


Commercial Paper(All Registrants)


PPL Energy Supply,

PPL Electric, LG&E and KU maintain commercial paper programs to provide an additional financing source to fund their short-term liquidity needs, as necessary. Commercial paper issuances, included in "Short-term debt" on the Balance Sheets, are supported by the respective Registrant's Syndicated Credit Facility.


Outstanding The following commercial paper issuances are reflectedprograms were in "Short-term debt" on the Balance Sheets.  Atplace at March 31, 2014, the available capacity and the use of that capacity was as follows:

   
      Commercial  
      Paper Unused
   Capacity Issuances Capacity
           
PPL Energy Supply $ 750  $ 620  $ 130 
PPL Electric   300    60    240 
           
LG&E   350    15    335 
KU   350    110    240 
Total LKE   700    125    575 
 Total PPL $ 1,750  $ 805  $ 945 


113


2015:

      Commercial  
      Paper Unused
   Capacity Issuances Capacity
          
PPL Electric $ 300 $ 85 $ 215
           
LG&E   350   216   134
KU    350   193   157
Total LKE   700   409   291
 Total PPL $ 1,000 $ 494 $ 506

Long-term Debt and Equity Securities(PPL and PPL Electric)


The long-term debt and equity securities activity through March 31, 2014 was:

    Debt Net Stock
    Issuances (a) Retirements Issuances
            
PPL    $ 239  $ 15 
PPL Electric      10    
Non-cash Transactions:         
PPL (b) $ 750  $ 750    

(a)Issuances are net of pricing discounts, where applicable and exclude the impact of debt issuance costs.
(b)Represents the remarketing of Junior Subordinated Notes that were issued as a component of PPL's 2011 Equity Units.

Common Stock Dividends(PPL)

In February 2014,2015, PPL declared its quarterly common stock dividend, payable April 1, 2014,2015, at 37.25 cents per share (equivalent to $1.49 per annum). Future dividends, declared at the discretion of the Board of Directors, will be dependent upon future earnings, cash flows, financial and legal requirements and other factors.


Rating Agency Actions


(All Registrants)


Moody's, S&P and Fitch have periodically reviewreviewed the credit ratings onof the debt of the Registrants and their subsidiaries. Based on their respective independent reviews, the rating agencies may make certain ratings revisions or ratings affirmations.

105

A credit rating reflects an assessment by the rating agency of the creditworthiness associated with an issuer and particular securities that it issues. The credit ratings of the Registrants and their subsidiaries are based on information provided by the Registrants and other sources. The ratings of Moody's, S&P and Fitch are not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any securities of the Registrants or their subsidiaries. Such ratings may be subject to revisions or withdrawal by the agencies at any time and should be evaluated independently of each other and any other rating that may be assigned to the securities. The credit ratings of the Registrants and their subsidiaries affect their liquidity, access to capital markets and cost of borrowing under their credit facilities.


The rating agencies have taken the following actions related to the Registrants and their subsidiaries during 2014:


(PPL)

2015:

In January 2014, Moody's affirmed2015, Fitch withdrew its ratings and revised its outlook to stable for PPL.


In March 2014, Moody's, S&P and Fitch assigned ratings of Baa3, BBB- and BBB toPPL, PPL Capital Funding's $350 million 3.95% Senior Notes due 2024 and $400 million 5.00% Senior Notes due 2044.  Fitch also assigned a stable outlook to these notes.

In April 2014, Moody's affirmed the following ratings with a stable outlook:

·the long-term issuer ratings for WPD (East Midlands), WPD (West Midlands), PPL WW and WPD (South West);
·the senior unsecured ratings for PPL WEM, WPD (East Midlands), WPD (West Midlands), PPL WW, WPD (South Wales) and WPD (South West);
·the commercial paper rating for WPD (South West); and
·the short-term issuer ratings for WPD (East Midlands) and WPD (South West).

In April 2014, Fitch affirmed the following ratings with a stable outlook:
·the long-term and short-term issuer default ratings for PPL and PPL Capital Funding; and
·the senior unsecured rating and junior subordinated rating for PPL Capital Funding.

(PPL andFunding, PPL Energy Supply)

In April 2014, Fitch affirmed its long-term issuer default rating, short-term issuer default rating, senior unsecured rating and commercial paper rating with a negative outlook forSupply, PPL Energy Supply.

114



(PPL and PPL Electric)

In January 2014, Moody's upgraded its long-term issuer rating and senior unsecured rating, from Baa2 to Baa1, and senior secured rating, from A3 to A2, affirmed its commercial paper rating and revised its outlook to stable for PPL Electric.

In April 2014, Fitch affirmed its long-term issuer default rating, short-term issuer default rating, secured rating and commercial paper rating with a stable outlook for PPL Electric.

(PPL,Electric, LKE, LG&E, and KU)

In January 2014, Moody's affirmed its ratings and revised its outlook to stable for LKE.

In January 2014, Moody's upgraded its long-term issuer ratings and senior unsecured ratings, from Baa1 to A3, and senior secured ratings, from A2 to A1, affirmed its commercial paper ratings and revised its outlook to stable for LG&E and KU.

In February 2014, Moody's affirmed its ratings for KU's 2000 Series A Solid Waste Disposal Facility Revenue Bonds, KU's 2004 Series A and 2008 Series A Environmental Facilities Revenue Bonds and KU's 2006 Series B Environmental Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds.

In April 2014, Fitch affirmed the following ratings with a stable outlook:
·the long-term and short-term issuer default ratings for LKE, LG&E and KU;
·the senior unsecured debt ratings for LKE, LG&E and KU; and
·the secured debt and commercial paper ratings for LG&E and KU.

Ratings Triggers


(All Registrants except PPL Electric)


Various derivative and non-derivative contracts, including contracts for the sale and purchase of electricity and fuel, commodity transportation and storage, interest rate and foreign currency instruments (for PPL), contain provisions that require the posting of additional collateral or permit the counterparty to terminate the contract, if PPL's, PPL Energy Supply's, LKE's, LG&E's or KU's or their subsidiaries' credit rating, as applicable, were to fall below investment grade. See Note 14 to the Financial Statements for a discussion of "Credit Risk-Related Contingent Features," including a discussion of the potential additional collateral that would have been requiredrequirements for PPL, LKE and LG&E for derivative contracts in a net liability position at March 31, 2014.


2015.

(All Registrants)


For additional information on the Registrants' liquidity and capital resources, see "Item 7. Combined Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," in the Registrants' 20132014 Form 10-K.


Risk Management


Market Risk


(All Registrants)


See Notes 13 and 14 to the Financial Statements for information about the Registrants' risk management objectives, valuation techniques and accounting designations.


The forward-looking information presented below provides estimates of what may occur in the future, assuming certain adverse market conditions and model assumptions. Actual future results may differ materially from those presented. These disclosures are not precise indicators of expected future losses, but only indicators of possible losses under normal market conditions at a given confidence level.



115


Commodity Price Risk (Non-trading)


(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)


LG&E's and KU's retail electric and natural gas rates and municipal wholesale electric rates are set by regulatory commissions and the fuel costs incurred are directly recoverable from customers. As a result, LG&E and KU are subject to commodity price risk for only a small portion of on-goingtheir business operations. LG&E and KU sell excess economic generation to maximize the value of the physical assets at times when the assets are not required to serve LG&E's or KU's customers. See Note 14to the Financial Statements for additional information.


(PPL and PPL Electric)


PPL Electric is exposed to market price and volumetric risks from its obligation as a PLR. The PUC has approved a cost recovery mechanism that allows PPL Electric to pass through to customers the cost associated with fulfilling its PLR obligation. This cost recovery mechanism substantially eliminates PPL Electric's exposure to market price risk. PPL Electric also mitigates its exposure to volumetric risk by entering into full-requirement energy supply contracts for the majority of its

106

PLR obligations. These supply contracts transfer the volumetric risk associated with the PLR obligation to the energy suppliers.


(PPL and PPL Energy Supply)

(PPL)

PPL Energy Supply segregates its non-trading activities into two categories: hedge activity and economic activity. Transactions that are accounted for as hedge activity qualify for hedge accounting treatment. The economic activity category includes transactions that address a specific risk, but were not eligible for hedge accounting or for which hedge accounting was not elected. This activity includes the changes in fair value of positions used to hedge a portion of the economic value of PPL Energy Supply's competitive generation assets and full-requirement sales and retail contracts. This economic activity is subject to changes in fair value due to market price volatility of the input and output commodities (e.g., fuel and power). Although they do not receive hedge accounting treatment, these transactions are considered non-trading activity. See Note 14 to the Financial Statements for additional information.


To hedge the impact of market price volatility on PPL Energy Supply's energy-related assets, liabilities and other contractual arrangements, PPL Energy Supply both sells and purchases physical energy at the wholesale level under FERC market-based tariffs throughout the U.S. and enters into financial exchange-traded and over-the-counter contracts. PPL Energy Supply's non-trading commodity derivative contracts range in maturity through 2019.


2020.

The following tables sets forth the changes in the net fair value of non-trading commodity derivative contracts for the periodsperiod ended March 31. See Notes 13 and 14 to the Financial Statements for additional information.


        Gains (Losses)
    Three Months
      2014  2013 
             
Fair value of contracts outstanding at the beginning of the period       $ 107  $ 473 
Contracts realized or otherwise settled during the period         505    (137)
Fair value of new contracts entered into during the period (a)         (16)   9 
Other changes in fair value         (737)   (116)
Fair value of contracts outstanding at the end of the period       $ (141) $ 229 

   Gains (Losses)
   Three Months
   2015 2014
        
Fair value of contracts outstanding at the beginning of the period  $ 53 $ 107
Contracts realized or otherwise settled during the period    133   505
Fair value of new contracts entered into during the period (a)    (5)   (16)
Other changes in fair value    (92)   (737)
Fair value of contracts outstanding at the end of the period  $ 89 $ (141)

(a)Represents the fair value of contracts at the end of the quarter of their inception.

The following table segregates the net fair value of non-trading commodity derivative contracts at March 31, 2014,2015, based on the observability of the information used to determine the fair value.


   Net Asset (Liability)
   Maturity       Maturity   
   Less Than Maturity Maturity in Excess Total Fair
   1 Year 1-3 Years 4-5 Years of 5 Years Value
Source of Fair Value               
Prices based on significant observable inputs (Level 2) $ (103) $ (34) $ 8  $ 3  $ (126)
Prices based on significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)   (30)   12    3         (15)
Fair value of contracts outstanding at the end of the period $ (133) $ (22) $ 11  $ 3  $ (141)


116


   Net Asset (Liability)
   Maturity       Maturity   
   Less Than Maturity Maturity in Excess Total Fair
   1 Year 1-3 Years 4-5 Years of 5 Years Value
Source of Fair Value               
Prices based on significant observable inputs (Level 2) $ 53 $ (34) $ 13    $ 32
Prices based on significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)   32   23   2      57
Fair value of contracts outstanding at the end of the period $ 85 $ (11) $ 15    $ 89

PPL Energy Supply sells electricity, capacity and related services and buys fuel on a forward basis to hedge the value of energy from its generation assets. If PPL Energy Supply were unable to deliver firm capacity and energy or to accept the delivery of fuel under its agreements, under certain circumstances it could be required to pay liquidating damages. These damages would be based on the difference between the market price and the contract price of the commodity. Depending on price changes in the wholesale energy markets, such damages could be significant. Extreme weather conditions, unplanned power plant outages, transmission disruptions, nonperformance by counterparties (or their counterparties) with which it has energy contracts and other factors could affect PPL Energy Supply's ability to meet its obligations, or cause significant increases in the market price of replacement energy. Although PPL Energy Supply attempts to mitigate these risks, there can be no assurance that it will be able to fully meet its firm obligations, that it will not be required to pay damages for failure to perform, or that it will not experience counterparty nonperformance in the future.


Commodity Price Risk (Trading)


PPL Energy Supply's trading commodity derivative contracts range in maturity through 2020. The following table sets forth changes in the net fair value of trading commodity derivative contracts for the periods ended March 31. See Notes 13 and 14 to the Financial Statements for additional information.


        Gains (Losses)
    Three Months
      2014  2013 
             
Fair value of contracts outstanding at the beginning of the period       $ 11  $ 29 
Contracts realized or otherwise settled during the period              (2)
Fair value of new contracts entered into during the period (a)         (13)   (12)
Other changes in fair value         33      
Fair value of contracts outstanding at the end of the period       $ 31  $ 15 

107

   Gains (Losses)
   Three Months
   2015 2014
        
Fair value of contracts outstanding at the beginning of the period  $ 48 $ 11
Contracts realized or otherwise settled during the period    (30)   
Fair value of new contracts entered into during the period (a)    (7)   (13)
Other changes in fair value    35   33
Fair value of contracts outstanding at the end of the period  $ 46 $ 31

(a)Represents the fair value of contracts at the end of the quarter of their inception.

The following table segregates the net fair value of trading commodity derivative contracts at March 31, 2014,2015, based on the observability of the information used to determine the fair value.


  Net Asset (Liability)
  Maturity      Maturity  
  Less Than Maturity Maturity in Excess Total Fair
  1 Year 1-3 Years 4-5 Years of 5 Years Value
Source of Fair Value               
Prices quoted in active markets for identical instruments (Level 1) $ 1                 $ 1 
Prices based on significant observable inputs (Level 2)   (1) $ (3) $ 1  $ 1    (2)
Prices based on significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)   3    16    8    5    32 
Fair value of contracts outstanding at the end of the period $ 3  $ 13  $ 9  $ 6  $ 31 

  Net Asset (Liability)
  Maturity      Maturity  
  Less Than Maturity Maturity in Excess Total Fair
  1 Year 1-3 Years 4-5 Years of 5 Years Value
Source of Fair Value               
Prices based on significant observable inputs (Level 2) $ (6) $ (11) $ (9)    $ (26)
Prices based on significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)   4   33   33 $ 2   72
Fair value of contracts outstanding at the end of the period $ (2) $ 22 $ 24 $ 2 $ 46

VaR Models


A VaR model is utilized to measure commodity price risk in unregulated gross energy margins for the non-trading and trading portfolios. VaR is a statistical model that attempts to estimate the value of potential loss over a given holding period under normal market conditions at a given confidence level. VaR is calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation technique based on a five-day holding period at a 95% confidence level. Given the company's disciplined hedging program, the non-trading VaR exposure is expected to be limited in the short-term. The VaR for portfolios using end-of-month results for the three months ended March 31, 20142015 was as follows.


   Trading VaR Non-Trading VaR
95% Confidence Level, Five-Day Holding Period      
 Period End $ 8  $
 Average for the Period   8   
 High   9   
 Low   8   

       
   Trading Non-Trading
95% Confidence Level, Five-Day Holding Period      
 Period End $ 4 $ 12
 Average for the Period   4   10
 High   4   12
 Low   4   8

The trading portfolio includes all proprietary trading positions, regardless of the delivery period. All positions not considered proprietary trading are considered non-trading. The non-trading portfolio includes the entire portfolio, including generation, with delivery periods through the next 12 months. Both the trading and non-trading VaR computations exclude FTRs due to the absence of reliable spot and forward markets. The fair value of the non-trading and trading FTR positions was insignificant atinsignificantat March 31, 2014.


117


2015.

Interest Rate Risk (All Registrants)


The Registrants and their subsidiaries issue debt to finance their operations, which exposes them to interest rate risk. The Registrants and their subsidiaries utilize various financial derivative instruments to adjust the mix of fixed and floating interest rates in their debt portfolios, adjust the duration of their debt portfolios and lock in benchmark interest rates in anticipation of future financing, when appropriate. Risk limits under the risk management program are designed to balance risk exposure to volatility in interest expense and changes in the fair value of the debt portfolios due to changes in the absolute level of interest rates.


The following interest rate hedges were outstanding at March 31, 2014.

2015.


         Effect of a  
      Fair Value, 10% Adverse Maturities
    Exposure Net - Asset Movement Ranging
   Hedged (Liability) (a)  in Rates (b) Through
PPL           
Cash flow hedges           
 Interest rate swaps (c) $ 500  $ 1  $ (15) 2025 
 Cross-currency swaps (d)   1,262    (57)   (179) 2028 
Economic hedges           
 Interest rate swaps (e)   179    (40)   (3) 2033 
LKE and LG&E           
Economic hedges           
 Interest rate swaps  (e)   179    (40)   (3) 2033 

108

         Effect of a  
      Fair Value, 10% Adverse Maturities
    Exposure Net - Asset Movement Ranging
   Hedged (Liability) (a) in Rates (b) Through
PPL           
Cash flow hedges           
 Interest rate swaps (c) $ 1,600 $ (183) $ (54) 2045
 Cross-currency swaps (d)   1,262   47   (162) 2028
Economic hedges           
 Interest rate swaps (e)   179   (52)   (3) 2033
LKE           
Cash flow hedges           
 Interest rate swaps (c)   1,000   (122)   (40) 2045
Economic hedges           
 Interest rate swaps (e)   179   (52)   (3) 2033
LG&E           
Cash flow hedges           
 Interest rate swaps (c)   500   (61)   (20) 2045
Economic hedges           
 Interest rate swaps (e)   179   (52)   (3) 2033
KU           
Cash flow hedges           
 Interest rate swaps (c)   500   (61)   (20) 2045

(a)Includes accrued interest, if applicable.
(b)Effects of adverse movements decrease assets or increase liabilities, as applicable, which could result in an asset becoming a liability. Sensitivities represent a 10% adverse movement in interest rates, except for cross-currency swaps which also includes foreign currency exchange rates.
(c)Changes in the fair value of such cash flow hedges are recorded in equity or as regulatory assets or regulatory liabilities, if recoverable through regulated rates, and reclassified into earnings in the same period during which the item being hedged affects earnings.
(d)Cross-currency swaps are utilized to hedge the principal and interest payments of WPD's U.S. dollar-denominated senior notes. Changes in the fair value of these instruments are recorded in equity and reclassified into earnings in the same period during which the item being hedged affects earnings.
(e)Realized changes in the fair value of such economic hedges are recoverable through regulated rates and any subsequent changes in the fair value of these derivatives are included in regulatory assets or regulatory liabilities.

The Registrants are exposed to a potential increase in interest expense and to changes in the fair value of their debt portfolios. The estimated impact of a 10% adverse movement in interest rates at March 31, 20142015 is shown below.


      PPL Energy  PPL         
   PPL Supply  Electric LKE LG&E KU
                    
Increase to interest expense of 10% Not  Not  Not   Not   Not   Not 
 increase in interest rates Significant  Significant  Significant  Significant  Significant  Significant 
Increase in fair value of 10% decrease                  
 in interest rates $ 762  $ 43  $ 117  $ 144  $ 45  $ 84 

   PPL PPL Electric LKE LG&E KU
                 
 Increase in interest expenseNot  Not  Not  Not  Not
   Significant  Significant  Significant  Significant  Significant
                 
 Increase in fair value of debt$ 662 $ 128 $ 133 $ 43 $ 79

Foreign Currency Risk (PPL)


PPL is exposed to foreign currency risk, primarily through investments in U.K. affiliates. In addition, PPL's domestic operations may make purchases of equipment in currencies other than U.S. dollars.


PPL has adopted a foreign currency risk management program designed to hedge certain foreign currency exposures, including firm commitments, recognized assets or liabilities, anticipated transactions and net investments. In addition, PPL enters into financial instruments to protect against foreign currency translation risk of expected earnings.


The following foreign currency hedges were outstanding at March 31, 2014.


       Effect of a  
       10%  
       Adverse  
       Movement  
       in Foreign  
     Fair Value, Currency Maturities
   Exposure Net - Asset Exchange Ranging
   Hedged (Liability) Rates (a) Through
             
Net investment hedges (b) £ 345  $ (24) $ (57) 2015 
Economic hedges (c)   1,840    (94)   (291) 2016 

118



2015.

       Effect of a  
       10%  
       Adverse  
       Movement  
       in Foreign  
     Fair Value, Currency Maturities
   Exposure Net - Asset Exchange Ranging
   Hedged (Liability) Rates (a) Through
             
Net investment hedges (b) £ 217 $ 34 $ (32) 2016
Economic hedges (c)   1,306   169   (177) 2017

(a)Effects of adverse movements decrease assets or increase liabilities, as applicable, which could result in an asset becoming a liability.
(b)To protect the value of a portion of its net investment in WPD, PPL executes forward contracts to sell GBP.  The positions outstanding exclude the amount of intercompany loans classified as net investment hedges.  See Note 14 to the Financial Statements for additional information.
(c)To economically hedge the translation of expected earnings denominated in GBP to U.S. dollars, PPL enters into a combination of average rate forwards and average rate options to sell GBP.dollars.

109

NDT Funds - Securities Price Risk (PPL and PPL Energy Supply)


(PPL)

In connection with certain NRC requirements, PPL Susquehanna maintains trust funds to fund certain costs of decommissioning the PPL Susquehanna nuclear plant (Susquehanna). At March 31, 2014,2015, these funds were invested primarily in domestic equity securities and fixed-rate, fixed-income securities and are reflected at fair value on the Balance Sheet. The mix of securities is designed to provide returns sufficient to fund Susquehanna's decommissioning and to compensate for inflationary increases in decommissioning costs. However, the equity securities included in the trusts are exposed to price fluctuation in equity markets, and the values of fixed-rate, fixed-income securities are primarily exposed to changes in interest rates. PPL actively monitors the investment performance and periodically reviews asset allocation in accordance with its nuclear decommissioning trust policy statement. At March 31, 2014,2015, a hypothetical 10% increase in interest rates and a 10% decrease in equity prices would have resulted in an estimated $67$74 million reduction in the fair value of the trust assets. See Notes 13 and 17 to the Financial Statements for additional information regarding the NDT funds.


Credit Risk(All Registrants)


See Notes 13 and 14 to the Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q and "Risk Management - Credit Risk" in the Registrants' 20132014 Form 10-K for additional information.


Foreign Currency Translation (PPL)


The value of the British pound sterling fluctuates in relation to the U.S. dollar. Changes in this exchange rate resulted in a foreign currency translation loss of $77 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015, which primarily reflected a $199 million decrease to PP&E and goodwill offset by a decrease of $122 million to net liabilities. Changes in this exchange rate resulted in a foreign currency translation gain of $135 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014, which primarily reflected a $334 million increase to PP&E and goodwill offset by an increase of $199 million to net liabilities. Changes in this exchange rate resulted in a foreign currency translation loss of $256 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013, which primarily reflected a $696 million decrease to PP&E and goodwill offset by a decrease of $440 million to net liabilities.  The impact of foreign currency translation is recorded in AOCI.


Related Party Transactions(All Registrants)


The Registrants are not aware of any material ownership interests or operating responsibility by senior management in outside partnerships, including leasing transactions with variable interest entities, or other entities doing business with the Registrants. See Note 11 to the Financial Statements for additional information on related party transactions for PPL Energy Supply, PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU.


Acquisitions, Development and Divestitures

(All Registrants)


The Registrants from time to time evaluate opportunities for potential acquisitions, divestitures and development projects. Development projects are reexamined based on market conditions and other factors to determine whether to proceed with the projects, sell, cancel or expand them, execute tolling agreements or pursue other options. See Note 8 to the Financial Statements for information on the more significant activities.


(PPL)

See Note 8 to the Financial Statements for information on the anticipated spinoff of PPL Energy Supply and the completed Montana hydro sale.

Environmental Matters


(All Registrants)


Registrants except PPL Electric)

Extensive federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations are applicable to PPL's, PPL Energy Supply's, LKE's, LG&E's and KU's air emissions, water discharges and the management of hazardous and solid waste, as well as other aspects of the Registrants' businesses. The cost of compliance or alleged non-compliance cannot be predicted with certainty but could be material. In addition, costs may increase significantly if the requirements or scope of environmental laws or regulations, or similar rules, are expanded or changed. Costs may take the form of increased capital expenditures or operating and maintenance expenses, monetary fines, penalties or other restrictions. Many of these environmental law considerations are also applicable to the operations of key suppliers, or customers, such as coal producers and industrial power users, and may impact the cost for their products or their demand for the Registrants' services.


110
119


The following is a discussion of the more significant environmental matters. See Note 10 to the Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q and "Item 1. Business - Environmental Matters" in the Registrants' 2013 Form 10-K for additional information on environmental matters.


Climate Change


Physical effects associated with climate change could include the impact of changes in weather patterns, such as storm frequency and intensity, and the resultant potential damage, as applicable, to the Registrants' generation assets, electricity transmission and delivery systems, as well as impacts on the Registrants' customers. In addition, changed weather patterns could potentially reduce annual rainfall in areas where PPL, PPL Energy Supply, LKE, LG&E and KU have hydroelectric generating facilities or where river water is used to cool their fossil and nuclear (as applicable) powered generators. The Registrants cannot currently predict whether their businesses will experience these potential risks or estimate the cost of their related consequences.


In June 2013, President Obama released his Climate Action Plan which reiterates the goal of reducing greenhouse gasGHG emissions in the U.S. "in the range of" 17% below 2005 levels by 2020 through such actions as regulating power plant emissions, promoting increased use of renewables and clean energy technology, and establishing tightermore restrictive energy efficiency standards. Also, by Presidential Memorandum,Additionally, the Climate Action Plan calls for the U.S. to prepare for the impacts of climate change. Requirements related to this plan could affect the Registrants and others in the industry as modifications may be needed to electricity delivery systems to improve the ability to withstand major storms in order to meet those requirements. As further described below, the EPA was directedhas proposed rules pursuant to issuethis directive, which it expects to finalize in the second or third quarter of 2015. The EPA has also announced that it will develop a federal implementation plan which would apply to any states that fail to submit an acceptable state implementation plan. The EPA's authority to promulgate these regulations under Section 111 of the Clean Air Act when the sources are already regulated under Section 112 is under challenge in the D.C. Circuit Court. Oral arguments were heard on April 16, 2015.

In January 2014, the EPA issued a revised proposal forto regulate carbon dioxide emissions from new power plants (a prior proposal was issued in 2012) by September 20, 2013, with a final rule to be issued in a timely fashion thereafter, and to issue proposed standards for existing power plants by June 1, 2014 with a final rule by June 1, 2015.  The EPA was further directed to require that states develop implementation plans for existing plants by June 2016.


The EPA's revised proposal for new sources was published in the Federal Register on January 8, 2014, with comments due on May 9, 2014.plants. The proposed limits for coalcoal-fired plants can only be achieved through carbon capture and sequestration, a technology that is not presently commercially viable and, therefore, effectively preclude the construction of new coalcoal-fired plants. The proposed standards for new gasgas-fired plants may also not be continuously achievable. RegulationThe preclusion of GHGnew coal-fired plants and the compliance difficulties posed for new gas-fired plants could have a significant industry-wide impact.

In June 2014, the EPA issued a proposed regulation addressing carbon dioxide emissions from existing power plants. The existing plant proposal contains stringent, state-specific rate-based reduction goals to be achieved in two phases (2020-2029 and 2030 and beyond). The EPA believes it has offered some flexibility to the states as to how state compliance plans can be crafted, including the option to demonstrate compliance on a mass basis and through multi-state collaborations. The EPA is also proposing potential state plan extensions based on the type of plan filed (single or multi-state). PPL has analyzed the proposal and identified potential impacts and solutions in comments filed on December 1, 2014. PPL also submitted Supplemental Comments to FERC through EEI, advocating for reliability coordination and relief in response to technical conferences hosted by FERC on the reliability implications of implementing this rule. The regulation of carbon dioxide emissions from existing plants could have a significant industry-wide impact depending on the structure and stringency of the final rule and state implementation plans.


The Administration's increase in its estimate

Waters of the "social cost of carbon" (which is used to calculate benefits associated with proposed regulations) from $23.80 to $38 per metric ton in 2015 may lead to more costly regulatory requirements.  The White House Office of ManagementUnited States (WOTUS)

In April 2014, the EPA and Budget has opened this issue for public comment.


Additionally, the Climate Action Plan goal to prepare the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers published a proposed rule that could greatly expand the Clean Water Act definition of Waters of the United States. If the definition is expanded as proposed, permits and other regulatory requirements may be imposed for many matters presently not covered (including vegetation management for transmission lines and activities affecting storm water conveyances and wetlands), the impactsimplications of climate changewhich could affectbe significant. The EPA plans to make certain changes to the proposed regulation based on comments received. The U.S. House and Senate are considering legislation to block this regulation. Until a final rule is issued, the Registrants cannot predict the outcome of the pending rulemaking. A final rule is expected by summer 2015.

Coal Combustion Residuals (CCRs)

On April 17, 2015, the EPA published its final rule regulating CCRs, imposing extensive new requirements, including location restrictions, design and operating standards, groundwater monitoring and corrective action requirements and closure and post-closure care requirements on CCR impoundments and landfills that are located on active power plants and not closed. Under the rule, the EPA will regulate CCRs as non-hazardous under Subtitle D of RCRA and allow beneficial use of CCRs, with some restrictions. The CCR rule will become effective on October 14, 2015. This self-implementing rule requires posting of compliance documentation on a publicly accessible website and is enforceable through citizen suits. PPL expects that its plants using surface impoundments for management and disposal of CCRs or the past management of CCRs and continued use to manage waste waters will be most impacted by this rule. The rule's requirements for covered CCR impoundments and landfills include commencement or completion of closure activities generally between three and ten years from certain triggering events. PPL, Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU also anticipate incurring capital or operation and others inmaintenance

111

costs prior to that time to address other provisions of the industryrule, such as it could result in requirementsgroundwater monitoring and disposal facility modifications, or to modify electricity generating, transmissionimplement various compliance strategies.

PPL, LKE, LG&E and delivery systems to improveKU are reviewing the ability to withstand major stormsrule and substantial capital investment may be needed to meet those requirements.


(All Registrants except PPL Electric)

Coal Combustion Residuals (CCRs)
In June 2010, the EPA proposed two approaches to regulating the disposal and management of CCRs (as either hazardous or non-hazardous waste) under RCRA.  Under a litigation settlement agreement involving certain environmental groups, the EPA has agreed to issueare still evaluating its final rulemaking by the end of 2014.  Regulations could impact handling, disposal and/or beneficial use of CCRs.  The financial and operational impactimpact. It is expected that these requirements will result in increases to be material if CCRs are regulated as hazardous waste, and significant if regulated as non-hazardous.

In July 2013, the U.S. House of Representatives passed House Bill H.R. 2218, the Coal Residuals and Reuse Management Act of 2013,existing AROs which would preempt the EPA from regulating CCRs under RCRA and set rules governing state programs.  It remains uncertain whether similar legislation will be passed byrecorded in the U.S. Senate.  Recent ash spills that have occurred withinsecond quarter of 2015. PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU are not yet able to determine an estimate of the utility industry may precipitate more stringent regulation of both activeexpected increases to the existing AROs. PPL, LKE, LG&E and legacy CCR sites.

KU believe relevant costs relating to this rule are subject to future rate recovery before the respective state regulatory agencies, or the FERC, as applicable.

Effluent Limitation Guidelines (ELGs)

and Standards

In June 2013, the EPA published proposed regulations to revise discharge limitations for steam electric generation wastewater permits. The proposed limitations are based on the EPA review of available treatment technologies and their capacity for reducing pollutants and include new requirements for fly ash and bottom ash transport water and metal cleaning waste waters, as well as new limits for scrubber wastewater and landfill leachate. The EPA's proposed ELG regulations also contain some requirements that would affect the inspection and operation of CCR facilities, if finalized.finalized as proposed. The proposal contains several alternative approaches, some of which could significantly impact PPL's, PPL Energy Supply's, LKE's, LG&E's and KU's coal-fired plants. The final regulation is expected to be issued in Septemberby the third or fourth quarter of 2015. At the present time,


120


PPL, PPL Energy Supply, LKE, LG&E and KU are unable to predict the outcome of this matter or estimate a range of reasonably possible costs, but the costs could be significant.

Clean Water Act
In April 2011, the EPA published a draft regulation under Section 316(b) Pending finalization of the ELGs, certain states (including Pennsylvania and Kentucky) and environmental groups are proposing more stringent technology-based limits in permit renewals. Depending on the final limits imposed, the costs of compliance could vary significantly from the current capital expenditures projections and costs could be imposed ahead of federal timelines.

Clean Water Act which316(b)

The EPA's final 316(b) rule for existing facilities became effective in October 2014, and regulates cooling water intakes for power plants.intake structures and their impact on aquatic organisms. States are allowed considerable authority to make site-specific determinations under the rule. The draft rule has two provisions: requiring installation of Best Technology Available (BTA)requires existing facilities to choose between several options to reduce mortality ofthe impact to aquatic organisms that arebecome trapped against water intake screens (impingement) and to determine the intake structure's impact on aquatic organisms pulled into the plantthrough a plant's cooling water system (entrainment), and imposing standards for reduction of mortality of aquatic organisms trapped on water intake screens (impingement). The final rule is now expected by May 16, 2014.  The proposed regulation would apply to nearly all PPL-owned steam electric generation plants in Pennsylvania, Kentucky, and Montana, potentially even including thosePlants already equipped with closed-cycle cooling, systems.  PPL's,an acceptable option, would likely not incur substantial costs. Once-through systems would likely require additional technology to comply with the rule. Mill Creek Unit 1 and Brunner Island (all units) are the only units expected to be impacted. PPL, Energy Supply's, LKE's,LKE, LG&E's&E and KU'sKU are evaluating compliance strategies but do not presently expect the compliance costs couldto be significant, especially if the final rule requires closed-cycle systems at plants that do not currently have them or conversions of once-through systems to closed-cycle.


material.

MATS

In February 2012, the EPA finalized the MATS rule requiring fossil-fuel fired plants to reduce emissions of mercury and other hazardous air pollutants by April 16, 2015. The rule which was challenged by industry groups and states, and was upheld by the D.C. Circuit Court in April 2014. A group of states subsequently petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to review this decision and on March 25, 2015, oral arguments were heard as to one issue - whether or not EPA unreasonably refused to consider costs when determining whether the MATS regulation was appropriate and necessary. A U.S. Supreme Court decision is expected by June 30, 2015. The EPA has subsequently proposed changes torule provides for a three-year compliance deadline with the rule with respect to new sources to addresspotential for one- and two-year extensions as provided under the concern that the rule effectively precludes construction of any new coal-fired plants.statute. PPL, PPL Energy Supply, LKE, LG&E and KU are generally well-positioned to comply with MATS, primarily due to recent investments inhave completed installation or upgrading of relevant environmental controls at affected plants or have received compliance extensions, as applicable.

PPL Energy Supply and approved ECR plans to install additional controls at somebelieves that installation of  LG&E's and KU's Kentucky plants.  Additionally, PPL Energy Supply is evaluating chemical additive systems for mercury controland other controls may be necessary at Brunner Island, andcertain coal-fired plants in Pennsylvania, the capital cost of which is not expected to be significant. PPL continues to analyze the potential impact of MATS on operating costs. With respect to PPL's Montana plants, modifications to existingthe air pollution controls installed at Colstrip for improved particulate matter reductions.  In September 2012, PPL Energy Supply announced its intentionare required, the cost of which is not expected to place itsbe significant. Operations were suspended and the Corette plant was retired in long-term reserve status beginning in AprilMarch 2015 due to expected market conditions and the costs to comply with MATS.  The Corette plant asset group was determined to be impaired in December 2013.  See "Applicationthe MATS requirements.

LG&E's March 2015 retirement of Critical Accounting Policies - Asset Impairment (Excluding Investments)" in PPL'sone coal-fired generating unit at Cane Run and PPL Energy Supply's 2013 Form 10-K for additional information.  Also, LG&E, KU and PPL Energy Supply have received compliance extensions for certain plants in Kentucky and Pennsylvania and are considering extension requests for other plants as well.


LG&E's and KU's anticipated retirementsretirement of remaining coal-fired electricity generating units located at the Cane Run and Green River plantsin 2015 and 2016 are in response to MATS and other environmental regulations.

The retirement of these units is not expected to have a material impact on the financial condition or results of operations of PPL, LKE, LG&E or KU.

CSAPR

The EPA's CSAPR addresses the interstate transport of fine particulates and CAIR

In 2011, the EPA finalized its CSAPRozone by regulating emissions of nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide through newand nitrogen oxide. In accordance with an October 2014 U.S. Court of Appeals decision, CSAPR establishes interstate allowance trading programs which were to be implementedfor sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions from fossil-fueled plants in two phases (2012phases: Phase 1 commenced in January 2015 and 2014).  Like its predecessor, the CAIR, CSAPR targeted sourcesPhase 2 commences in the eastern U.S.  In December 2011, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit Court) stayed implementation of CSAPR, leaving CAIR in place.  Subsequently, in August 2012, the D. C. Circuit Court vacated CSAPR2017. Sulfur dioxide emissions are subject to an annual trading

112

program and remanded it backnitrogen oxide emissions are subject to annual and ozone season programs. Oral arguments pertaining to outstanding challenges to the EPA for further rulemaking, again leaving CAIR in place in the interim.  In June 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court granted the EPA's petition for review ofCSAPR were heard before the D.C. Circuit Court's decision to vacate CSAPR.  On April 29, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed and remanded the D.C. Circuit Court's August 2012 decision which will likely result in the CSAPR replacing the CAIR program.during February 2015.

Although PPL, PPL Energy Supply, LKE, LG&E and KU do not currently anticipate that theincurring significant costs of meeting CSAPR requirements will be significant.


PPL, PPL Energy Supply, LKE, LG&E and KU plants in Pennsylvania and Kentucky will continue to comply with CAIR through optimization of existing controls, balanced with emission allowance purchases.  The D. C. Circuit Court's August 2012 decision leaves plantsthese programs, changes in CSAPR-affected states potentially exposed to more stringent emission reductions for nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide due to regional haze implementation (see "Regional Haze" discussion below), and/market or petitions to the EPA by downwind states under Section 126 of the Clean Air Act requesting the EPA to require plantsoperating conditions could result in impacts that allegedly contribute to downwind non-attainment to take action to reduce emissions.

are higher than anticipated.

Regional Haze

Under the EPA's regional haze programs (developed to eliminate man-made visibility degradation by 2064), states are required to make reasonable progress every decade through the application, among other things, of Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) on power plants commissioned between 1962 and 1977. ForTo date, the focus of regional haze regulation has been on the western U.S. As for the eastern U.S., the EPA had determined that region-wide reductions under the CSAPR trading program could, in most instances, be utilized byunder state programs to satisfy BART requirements for sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides. However, although the August 2012 decisionEPA's determination is being challenged by the D.C. Circuit Courtenvironmental groups and others.

LG&E's Mill Creek Units 3 and 4 are required to vacate and remand CSAPR has been reversed by the U.S. Supreme Court, future decisions by EPA and the courts will determine whether power plants locatedreduce sulfuric acid mist emissions because they were determined to have a regional haze impact. These reductions are required in the eastern U.S., including PPL Energy Supply's plants in Pennsylvania andregional haze state implementation plan that the Kentucky Division for Air Quality submitted to the EPA. LG&E's and KU's plants in Kentucky, will&E is currently installing sorbent injection technology to comply with these reductions, the costs of which are not expected to be subject to further reductions in those pollutants in accordance with BART requirements.

121

Thesignificant.

In Montana, the EPA signed its finalfinalized a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) of the Regional Haze Rules for Montana in September 2012, with tighterstricter emissions limits for PPL Energy Supply's Colstrip Units 1 & 2 based on the installation of new controls (no limits or additional controls were specified for PPL Energy Supply's Colstrip Units 3 & 4), and tighterstricter emission limits for PPL Energy Supply'sthe Corette plant (which are not based on additional controls). The cost of the potential additional controls for Colstrip Units 1 & 2 if required, could be significant. PPL Energy Supply expects to meetwas meeting the tighterstricter permit limits at Corette without any significant changes to operations, although other requirements have led to the planned suspension of operations atand the retirement of Corette beginning in AprilMarch 2015 (see "MATS" discussion above). Both PPL and environmental groups have appealed the final FIP to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.


Circuit and litigation is ongoing.

National Ambient Air Quality Standards

In 2008, the EPA revised the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for ozone. As a result, of EPA's new ozone standard, states in the ozone transport region (OTR), including Pennsylvania, are required by the Clean Air Act to impose additional reductions in nitrogen oxide emissions based upon reasonably available control technologies.technologies (RACT). The PADEP has issuedis finalizing a draftRACT rule in 2015 requiring reasonable reductions.  However, the proposal is being challenged as too lenient by other OTR states and environmental groups.  The PADEP may imposesome fossil-fueled plants to operate at more stringent nitrogen oxide emission limits than those set forthrates. The EPA proposed to further strengthen the ozone standard in the proposed ruleNovember 2014, which could lead to further nitrogen oxide reductions for PPL's fossil-fueled plants within the OTR. The EPA is under court order to finalize the standard by October 1, 2015. States are also obligated to address interstate transport issues associated with new ozone standards through the establishment of "good neighbor" state implementation plans for those states that are found to contribute significantly to another states' non-attainment. The EPA recently sent a policy memo to state agencies to facilitate the development of these plans for the 2008 standard, including modeling data showing which states are contributing. The implementation of such plans could have a significantan impact on PPL Energy Supply's Pennsylvania coal plants.


Duringthe structure and stringency of CSAPR Phase 2 reductions (discussed above), or it could lead to the development of a new ozone transport rule. Non-OTR states, including Kentucky, are working together to evaluate further nitrogen oxide reductions from fossil-fueled plants with SCRs. The nature and timing of any additional reductions resulting from these evaluations cannot be determined at this time.

In 2010, and 2012, the EPA issuedfinalized a new, more stringent ambient air standardsstandard for sulfur dioxide and particulates, respectively.required states to identify areas that meet the standard and areas that are in "non-attainment". In July 2013, the EPA preliminarily designatedfinalized non-attainment designations for parts of the country, including part of Jefferson County in Kentucky and part of Yellowstone County in Montana. Attainment is due for both areas by 2018. Pursuant to a consent decree between the EPA and Sierra Club approved on March 2, 2015, states are working to finalize designations for other areas by the 2017 or 2020 deadline depending on which designation methodology is used. PPL, PPL Energy Supply, LKE, LG&E and KU anticipate that some of the measures required for compliance with the CSAPR, the MATS, or the Regional Haze Rules (as discussed above), such as a partial non-attainment area forupgraded or new sulfur dioxide.  Final designations of non-attainment areas may occur in 2014.  Existing environmental plans for LG&E's and KU's Kentucky plants, including announced retirements ofdioxide scrubbers at certain plants and, ECR-approvedin the case of LG&E and KU, the previously announced retirement of coal-fired generating units at the Cane Run, Green River and Tyrone plants, will help to achieve compliance with the new or upgraded scrubbers or baghouses at other plants, may aid in achievement of eventual ambient air requirements.  However, depending upon the specifics of final non-attainment designations and consequent compliance plans,sulfur dioxide standard. If additional controls mayreductions were to be required, the financial impact of which could be significant. The short-term impact on the Corette plant from the EPA's final designation of part of Yellowstone County in Montana as non-attainment is not expected to be significant, as the plant's operations were suspended and the plant was retired in March 2015. In addition, MDEQ submitted a request to the EPA for a determination that this area is in attainment. If the EPA agrees with this request, then the deadlines associated with non-attainment would be suspended.

In December 2012, the EPA finalized a new, more stringent, annual National Ambient Air Quality Standard for fine particulates. The rules were challenged by the D.C. Circuit Court and upheld in May 2014. Final designations for the 2012

113

particulate standard were published in January 2015. Non-attainment areas in Pennsylvania and Kentucky were identified; however, EPA recently approved state implementation plan revisions for both states that improved these classifications. PPL Energy Supply, LG&E and KU plants in Pennsylvania and Kentucky will not be expected to make further reductions towards achieving attainment.

New Accounting Guidance (All Registrants)


See Notes 2 and 19 to the Financial Statements for a discussion of new accounting guidance adopted and pending adoption.


Application of Critical Accounting Policies (All Registrants)


(All Registrants)

Financial condition and results of operations are impacted by the methods, assumptions and estimates used in the application of critical accounting policies. The following table summarizes the accounting policies by Registrant that are particularly important to an understanding of the reported financial condition or results of operations, and require management to make estimates or other judgments of matters that are inherently uncertain. See "Item 7. Combined Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in the Registrants' 20132014 Form 10-K for a discussion of each critical accounting policy.


      PPLPPL         
   PPL Energy SupplyElectric ElectricLKE LKELG&E LG&EKU
                
Defined Benefits X X X X XX
Loss AccrualsX X X X X X
Income Taxes X X X X XX
Asset Impairments (Excluding Investments)X X   X X X
AROs X X  X X X
Price Risk ManagementX X   X X X
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities X X X X X
Revenue Recognition - unbilled revenue    X X X X

114
122


PPL Corporation

PPL Energy Supply, LLC

PPL Electric Utilities Corporation

LG&E and KU Energy LLC

Louisville Gas and Electric Company

Kentucky Utilities Company


Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk


Reference is made to "Risk Management" in "Item 2. Combined Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."


Item 4. Controls and Procedures


(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.


PPL Corporation, PPL Energy Supply, LLC, PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company

The Registrants' principal executive officers and principal financial officers, based on their evaluation of the Registrants' disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) have concluded that, as of March 31, 2014,2015, the Registrants' disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that material information relating to the Registrants and their consolidated subsidiaries is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC's rules and forms, particularly during the period for which this quarterly report has been prepared. The aforementioned principal officers have concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are also effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive and principal financial officers, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.


(b) Change in internal controls over financial reporting.


PPL Corporation, PPL Energy Supply, LLC, PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company

The Registrants' principal executive officers and principal financial officers have concluded that there were no changes in the Registrants' internal control over financial reporting during the Registrants' first fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants' internal control over financial reporting.


PPL Corporation

Following the announcement of the transaction to spin off PPL Energy Supply, LLC to form Talen Energy, management determined the appropriate staffing for Talen Energy and for PPL and its subsidiaries. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, staffing changes, including the consolidation of certain positions and transition of responsibilities, resulted in changes in certain individuals responsible for executing internal controls. However, changes to system applications, business processes and the associated internal controls were not significant. Management has taken steps to minimize the risk from the changes in individuals executing internal controls.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION


Item 1. Legal Proceedings


For additional information regarding pending administrative and judicial proceedings involving regulatory, environmental and other matters, which information is incorporated by reference into this Part II, see:


 · "Item 3. Legal Proceedings" in each Registrant's 20132014 Form 10-K; and
 · Notes 6 and 10 to the Financial Statements.

Item 1A. Risk Factors


There have been no material changes in the Registrants' risk factors from those disclosed in "Item 1A. Risk Factors" of the 2013Registrants' 2014 Form 10-K.


Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures


Not applicable.


115
123


Item 6. Exhibits


The following Exhibits indicated by an asterisk preceding the Exhibit number are filed herewith. The balance of the Exhibits havehas heretofore been filed with the Commission and pursuant to Rule 12(b)-32 are incorporated herein by reference. Exhibits indicated by a [_] are filed or listed pursuant to Item 601(b)(10)(iii) of Regulation S-K.


1(a)
-
Securities Purchase and Registration RightsEquity Distribution Agreement, dated March 5, 2014,February 26, 2015, by and among PPL Capital Funding, Inc., PPL Corporation and the several purchasers named in Schedule B theretoMerrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (Exhibit 1.1 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated March 10, 2014)
February 26, 2015)
4(a)
1(b)
-
Supplemental Indenture No. 13,Equity Distribution Agreement, dated as of March 10, 2014,February 26, 2015, by and among PPL Capital Funding, Inc., PPL Corporation and The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly known as The Bank of New York), as TrusteeMorgan Stanley & Co. LLC (Exhibit 4.21.2 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated March 10, 2014)
February 26, 2015)
4(b)
*1(c)
-
Supplemental IndentureFinal Terms of the Western Power Distribution (East Midlands) plc £25,000,000 1.676% Index Linked Notes due September 24, 2052 under the £3,000,000,000 Euro Medium Term Note Programme
*[_]10(a)-Service Agreement, dated March 16, 2015, between Western Power Distribution (South West) plc and Robert A. Symons
*[_]10(b)-Amendment No. 14,6 to PPL Corporation Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, dated as of March 10, 2014, among PPL Capital Funding, Inc., PPL Corporation and The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly known as The Bank of New York), as Trustee (Exhibit 4.3 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated March 10, 2014)
April 15, 2015
10(a)
-
$150,000,000 Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of March 26, 2014, among PPL Capital Funding, Inc., as Borrower, PPL Corporation, as Guarantor and The Bank of Nova Scotia, as Administrative Agent, Issuing Lender and Lender (Exhibit 10.1 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated April 1, 2014)
10(b)
-
Twelfth Amendment, dated as of March 19, 2014, to Reimbursement Agreement, dated as of March 31, 2005, among PPL Energy Supply, LLC and The Bank of Nova Scotia, as Issuer and Administrative Agent (Exhibit 10.2 to PPL Energy Supply, LLC Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-32944) dated April 1, 2014)
-
PPL Corporation and Subsidiaries Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
-
PPL Energy Supply, LLC and Subsidiaries Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
-
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation and Subsidiaries Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
-
LG&E and KU Energy LLC and Subsidiaries Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
-
Louisville Gas and Electric Company Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
-
Kentucky Utilities Company Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
   
Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2014,2015, filed by the following officers for the following companies:
   
-
PPL Corporation's principal executive officer
-
PPL Corporation's principal financial officer
-
PPL Energy Supply, LLC's principal executive officer
-
PPL Energy Supply, LLC's principal financial officer
-
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation's principal executive officer
-
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation's principal financial officer
-
LG&E and KU Energy LLC's principal executive officer
-
LG&E and KU Energy LLC's principal financial officer
-
Louisville Gas and Electric Company's principal executive officer
-
Louisville Gas and Electric Company's principal financial officer
-
Kentucky Utilities Company's principal executive officer
-
Kentucky Utilities Company's principal financial officer

124



 
Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2014,2015, furnished by the following officers for the following companies:
   
-
PPL Corporation's principal executive officer and principal financial officer
-
PPL Energy Supply, LLC's principal executive officer and principal financial officer
-
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation's principal executive officer and principal financial officer
-
LG&E and KU Energy LLC's principal executive officer and principal financial officer
-
Louisville Gas and Electric Company's principal executive officer and principal financial officer
-
Kentucky Utilities Company's principal executive officer and principal financial officer
   
101.INS116

101.INS
-
XBRL Instance Document for PPL Corporation, PPL Energy Supply, LLC, PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company
101.SCH
-
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema for PPL Corporation, PPL Energy Supply, LLC, PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company
101.CAL
-
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase for PPL Corporation, PPL Energy Supply, LLC, PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company
101.DEF
-
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase for PPL Corporation, PPL Energy Supply, LLC, PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company
101.LAB
-
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase for PPL Corporation, PPL Energy Supply, LLC, PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company
101.PRE
-
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase for PPL Corporation, PPL Energy Supply, LLC, PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company

117

125


SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrants have duly caused this report to be signed on their behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. The signature for each undersigned company shall be deemed to relate only to matters having reference to such company or its subsidiaries.


 PPL Corporation
(Registrant)
PPL Energy Supply, LLC
 (Registrant) 
   
   
   
Date:  May 1, 20147, 2015/s/  Vincent SorgiStephen K. Breininger 
 Vincent SorgiStephen K. Breininger 
 Vice President and Controller 
 (Principal Accounting Officer) 
   
   
   
 PPL Electric Utilities Corporation
 (Registrant) 
   
   
   
Date:  May 1, 20147, 2015/s/  Dennis A. Urban, Jr. 
 Dennis A. Urban, Jr. 
 Controller 
 (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) 


 LG&E and KU Energy LLC
 (Registrant) 
   
 Louisville Gas and Electric Company
 (Registrant) 
   
 Kentucky Utilities Company
 (Registrant) 
   
   
   
Date:  May 1, 20147, 2015/s/  Kent W. Blake 
 

Kent W. Blake

Chief Financial Officer

 
 (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) 

126

118