UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

(Mark One)

x[X]QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007

March 31, 2019
or

o[  ]TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                        _______________to_______________to

Commission File Number:  0-24806001-38528


U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada
 
62-1378182
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)No.)
or organization)
   
4080 Jenkins Road
  
Chattanooga, Tennessee
 
37421
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(423) 510-3000
(Registrant’sRegistrant's telephone number, including area code)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [X]No [   ]

Yes
xNoo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically  every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).

Yes [X]No [   ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company.  See definitionthe definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company," and large accelerated filer""emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (Check one):

Large accelerated filero
 [   ]
Accelerated filerx [   ]
Non-accelerated filero
   [X]
Smaller reporting company [   ]
Emerging growth company [   ]

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.   [   ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YesoNox
Yes [   ]No [X]

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each classTrading symbol(s)Name of each exchange on which registered
Class A Common Stock, $0.01 par valueUSXThe New York Stock Exchange
As
Indicate the number of August 1, 2007, 12,130,098 shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date April 30, 2019.
Class A common stock,Common Stock, $0.01 par value $.01 per share, and 3,040,262 shares of the registrant’s value: 32,994,211
Class B common stock,Common Stock, $0.01 par value $.01 per share, were outstanding.

value: 15,616,551
1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

U.S. XPRESS ENTERPRISES, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I
PAGE NO.
  
Page
Number
Item 1. Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 
   
 3
   
 4
   
 5
6
 
7
   
Item 2.1321
   
Item 3.2435
   
Item 4.2435
  
PART II.
 
Page
Number
Item 1.36
   
Item 1A.2537
   
Item 2.2637
  
Item 3.37
Item 4.2637
   
Item 5.2737
   
Item 6.2738
   
U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc.
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018
       
  March 31,  December 31, 
(in thousands, except share amounts) 2019  2018 
       
Assets      
Current assets      
Cash and cash equivalents $2,095  $9,892 
Customer receivables, net of allowance of $101 and $59 at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively  185,710   190,254 
Other receivables  19,474   20,430 
Prepaid insurance and licenses  15,793   11,035 
Operating supplies  7,548   7,324 
Assets held for sale  8,086   33,225 
Other current assets  15,860   13,374 
Total current assets  254,566   285,534 
Property and equipment, at cost  904,209   898,530 
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization  (385,281)  (379,813)
Net property and equipment  518,928   518,717 
Other assets        
Operating lease right of use assets  186,941   - 
Goodwill  57,708   57,708 
Intangible assets, net  28,492   28,913 
Other  24,858   19,615 
Total other assets  297,999   106,236 
Total assets $1,071,493  $910,487 
Liabilities and Stockholder's Equity        
Current liabilities        
Accounts payable $63,368  $63,808 
Book overdraft  5,233   - 
Accrued wages and benefits  23,588   24,960 
Claims and insurance accruals, current  43,586   47,442 
Other accrued liabilities  8,386   8,120 
Liabilites associated with assets held for sale  -   6,856 
Current portion of operating lease liabilities  56,893   - 
Current maturities of long-term debt and finance leases  95,117   113,094 
Total current liabilities  296,171   264,280 
Long-term debt and finance leases, net of current maturities  314,049   312,819 
Less debt issuance costs  (1,264)  (1,347)
Net long-term debt and finance leases  312,785   311,472 
Deferred income taxes  21,385   19,978 
Long-term liabilities associated with assets held for sale  -   8,353 
Other long-term liabilities  6,483   7,713 
Claims and insurance accruals, long-term  60,518   60,304 
Noncurrent operating lease liabilities  129,927   - 
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 6 and 7)  -   - 
Stockholders' Equity        
Common stock Class A, $.01 par value, 140,000,000 shares authorized at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018,32,930,419 and 32,859,292 issued and outstanding at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively  329   329 
Common stock Class B, $.01 par value, 35,000,000 authorized at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, 15,616,551 and 15,486,560 issued and outstanding at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively  156   155 
Additional paid-in capital  252,559   251,742 
Accumulated deficit  (12,614)  (17,335)
Stockholders' equity  240,430   234,891 
Noncontrolling interest  3,794   3,496 
Total stockholders' equity  244,224   238,387 
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $1,071,493  $910,487 
         
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements


U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc.
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 and 2018
       
  Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 
(in thousands, except per share amounts) 2019  2018 
       
Operating revenue      
Revenue, before fuel surcharge $375,312  $382,858 
Fuel surcharge  40,051   42,850 
Total operating revenue  415,363   425,708 
Operating expenses        
Salaries, wages, and benefits  124,563   132,924 
Fuel and fuel taxes  46,904   58,389 
Vehicle rents  18,976   20,022 
Depreciation and amortization, net of (gain) loss on sale of property  23,062   24,706 
Purchased transportation  114,005   101,776 
Operating expenses and supplies  27,945   29,791 
Insurance premiums and claims  24,353   20,170 
Operating taxes and licenses  3,173   3,401 
Communications and utilities  2,265   2,466 
General and other operating expenses  17,479   17,209 
Total operating expenses  402,725   410,854 
Operating income  12,638   14,854 
Other expense (income)        
Interest expense, net  5,603   12,658 
Equity in loss of affiliated companies  89   296 
Other, net  26   (75)
   5,718   12,879 
Income before income tax provision  6,920   1,975 
Income tax provision  1,901   593 
Net total and comprehensive income  5,019   1,382 
Net total and comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest  298   223 
Net total and comprehensive income attributable to controlling interest $4,721  $1,159 
         
Earnings per share        
Basic earnings per share $0.10  $0.18 
Basic weighted average shares outstanding  48,394   6,385 
Diluted earnings per share $0.10  $0.18 
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding  49,391   6,385 
         
         
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements


U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc.
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
 Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 and 2018
       
  Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 
(in thousands) 2019  2018 
       
Operating activities      
Net income $5,019  $1,382 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:        
Deferred income tax provision  1,407   190 
Depreciation and amortization  21,833   23,901 
Losses on sale of equipment  1,229   805 
Share based compensation  856   208 
Other  308   1,688 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Receivables  3,560   (10,706)
Prepaid insurance and licenses  (4,761)  (5,242)
Operating supplies  (285)  (936)
Other assets  383   (1,582)
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities  (2,844)  (13,936)
Accrued wages and benefits  (1,226)  2,365 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  25,479   (1,863)
Investing activities        
Payments for purchases of property and equipment  (36,604)  (26,871)
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment  13,115   8,176 
Sale of subsidiary, net of cash  (9,002)  - 
Net cash used in investing activities  (32,491)  (18,695)
Financing activities        
Borrowings under lines of credit  -   102,676 
Payments under lines of credit  -   (82,950)
Borrowings under long-term debt  14,355   23,438 
Payments of long-term debt  (31,128)  (36,062)
Payments of financing costs and original issue discount  -   (14)
Payments of long-term consideration for business acquistion  (990)  (1,010)
Tax withholding related to net share settlement of restricted stock awards  (39)  - 
Repurchase of membership units  -   (51)
Book overdraft  5,233   9,469 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  (12,569)  15,496 
Change in cash previously included in assets held for sale  11,784   - 
Net change in cash and cash equivalents  (7,797)  (5,062)
Cash and cash equivalents        
Beginning of year  9,892   9,232 
End of period $2,095  $4,170 
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information        
Cash paid during the year for interest $5,620  $11,249 
Cash refunded during the year for income taxes  (91)  (330)
Supplemental disclosure of significant noncash investing and financing activities        
Debt obligations relieved in conjunction with the divesture of Xpress Internacional $7,109  $- 
Capital lease extinguishments  33   764 
Uncollected proceeds from asset sales  -   1,706 
         
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements


SIGNATURESU.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc.
28Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

                      
        Additional     Non  Total  Redeemable 
(in thousands, except share amounts) Class A  Class B  Paid  Accumulated  Controlling  Stockholders'  Restricted 
 Stock  Stock  In Capital  Deficit  Interest  Equity (Deficit)  Units 
                      
Balances at December 31, 2017 $64  $-  $1  $(43,459) $2,289  $(41,105) $3,281 
Share based compensation  -   -   -   -   -   -   208 
Adoption of ASC 606  -   -   -   1,459   -   1,459   - 
Dividend of repurchased membership units  -   -   -   -   -   -   (51)
Net income  -   -   -   1,159   223   1,382   - 
Balances at March 31, 2018 $64  $-  $1  $(40,841) $2,512  $(38,264) $3,438 
                             
                             
          Additional      Non  Total     
(in thousands, except share amounts) Class A  Class B  Paid  Accumulated  Controlling  Stockholders'     
 Stock  Stock  In Capital  Deficit  Interest  Equity     
                             
Balances at December 31, 2018 $329  $155  $251,742  $(17,335) $3,496  $238,387     
Share based compensation  -   -   856   -   -   856     
Vesting of 201,119 restricted units  -   1   (39)  -   -   (38)    
Net income  -   -   -   4,721   298   5,019     
Balances at March 31, 2019 $329  $156  $252,559  $(12,614) $3,794  $244,224     
                             
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

2Page 6

U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2019


Item 1.
Financial Statements
Organization and Operations

U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”, “we”, “us”, “our”, and similar expressions) provide transportation services throughout the United States and Mexico, with a focus in the densely populated and economically diverse eastern half of the United States. The Company offers its customers a broad portfolio of services using its own asset-based truckload fleet and third-party carriers through our non-asset-based truck brokerage network. The Company has two reportable segments, Truckload and Brokerage. Our Truckload segment offers asset-based truckload services, including over-the-road (“OTR”) trucking and dedicated contract services. Our Brokerage segment is principally engaged in non-asset-based freight brokerage services, where loads are contracted to third-party carriers.
U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc. completed its initial public offering in June 2018 (the “IPO” or the “offering”). Prior to the offering U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc. was wholly owned by New Mountain Lake Holdings, LLC (“New Mountain Lake”). New Mountain Lake was formed on October 12, 2007 solely for the purpose of taking U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc. private and holding 100% ownership of U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc. Immediately prior to the effectiveness of the offering, we completed a series of transactions (collectively, the “Reorganization”) pursuant to which New Mountain Lake merged with and into the Company, with the Company continuing as the surviving corporation.
In connection with the Reorganization, we adopted the Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, and converted into and exchanged the issued and outstanding membership units of New Mountain Lake immediately prior to the Reorganization for the Company’s common stock. We provided for the issuance of 4.6666667 shares of Class A common stock for each Class B non-voting membership unit in New Mountain Lake and 4.6666667 shares of Class B common stock for each Class A voting membership unit in New Mountain Lake. The holders of Class A common stock are entitled to one vote per share and the holders of Class B common stock are entitled to five votes per share. In the offering, the Company sold 16,668,000 shares of Class A common stock at a price of $16 per share to the public and received net proceeds of $246.6 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses.
Under our Articles of Incorporation, our authorized capital stock consists of 140,000,000 shares of Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per share, 35,000,000 shares of Class B common stock, par value $0.01 per share, and 9,333,333 shares of preferred stock, the rights and preferences of which may be designated by the Board of Directors.
2.
U.S. XPRESS ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)Basis of Presentation


  
Three Months Ended
June 30,
  
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
  
2007
  2006  
2007
  2006 
Operating Revenue:
            
Revenue, before fuel surcharge $
344,286
  $331,976  $
660,838
  $594,441 
Fuel surcharge  
56,061
   57,486   
100,382
   94,730 
Total operating revenue  
400,347
   389,462   
761,220
   689,171 
                 
Operating Expenses:
                
Salaries, wages and benefits  
133,578
   127,141   
260,676
   229,995 
Fuel and fuel taxes  
92,920
   89,196   
173,017
   155,533 
Vehicle rents  
24,620
   19,333   
47,605
   37,731 
Depreciation and amortization, net of gain/loss on sale  
19,441
   15,794   
38,971
   27,668 
Purchased transportation  
60,397
   61,304   
115,020
   107,813 
Operating expenses and supplies  
24,569
   25,233   
48,206
   44,557 
Insurance premiums and claims  
15,971
   16,285   
30,922
   29,553 
Operating taxes and licenses  
4,544
   4,328   
8,821
   7,991 
Communications and utilities  
2,884
   3,606   
5,765
   6,478 
General and other operating expenses  
10,905
   11,312   
21,397
   21,164 
Loss on sale and exit of business  
-
   400   
-
   400 
Total operating expenses  
389,829
   373,932   
750,400
   668,883 
                 
Income from Operations
  
10,518
   15,530   
10,820
   20,288 
                 
Interest expense, net  
5,482
   4,690   
10,964
   7,789 
Equity in (income) loss of affiliated companies  (242)  341   (366)  559 
Minority interest  
61
   365   
10
   503 
   
5,301
   5,396   
10,608
   8,851 
                 
Income before income taxes  
5,217
   10,134   
212
   11,437 
                 
Income tax provision  
2,482
   4,410   
106
   4,978 
                 
Net Income
 $
2,735
  $5,724  $
106
  $6,459 
                 
Earnings Per Share - basic
 $
0.18
  $0.37  $
0.01
  $0.42 
Weighted average shares - basic  
15,155
   15,321   
15,215
   15,323 
Earnings Per Share - diluted
 $
0.18
  $0.37  $
0.01
  $0.42 
Weighted average shares – diluted  
15,318
   15,614   
15,407
   15,559 




CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)

ASSETS
 
June 30, 2007
  
December 31, 2006
 
  (Unaudited)    
Current Assets:
      
Cash and cash equivalents $
300
  $913 
Customer receivables, net of allowance  
180,087
   168,079 
Other receivables  
11,709
   15,398 
Prepaid insurance and licenses  
13,943
   25,777 
Operating and installation supplies  
7,658
   7,767 
Deferred income taxes  
25,545
   25,545 
Other current assets  
12,091
   10,665 
Total current assets  
251,333
   254,144 
         
Property and Equipment, at cost:
        
Land and buildings  
74,045
   67,358 
Revenue and service equipment  
554,668
   537,570 
Furniture and equipment  
36,180
   35,441 
Leasehold improvements  
27,668
   29,857 
Computer software  
41,437
   39,584 
   
733,998
   709,810 
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization  (204,569)  (180,813)
Net property and equipment  
529,429
   528,997 
         
Other Assets:
        
Goodwill, net  
95,694
   94,307 
Other  
27,099
   25,919 
Total other assets  
122,793
   120,226 
         
Total Assets
 $
903,555
  $903,367 



U.S. XPRESS ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
June 30, 2007
  
December 31, 2006
 
  (Unaudited)    
Current Liabilities:
      
Accounts payable $
66,101
  $47,770 
Book overdraft  
2,039
   19,368 
Accrued wages and benefits  
21,301
   22,562 
Claims and insurance accruals, current  
51,307
   49,928 
Other accrued liabilities  
8,434
   9,137 
Securitization facility  
20,000
   37,000 
Current maturities of long-term debt  
59,010
   51,221 
Total current liabilities  
228,192
   236,986 
         
Long-term debt, net of current maturities
  
258,580
   252,313 
         
Deferred income taxes
  
122,512
   114,679 
         
Other long-term liabilities
  
2,720
   3,186 
         
Claims and insurance accruals, long-term
  
38,152
   40,125 
         
Minority interest
  
3,589
   3,579 
         
Stockholders’ Equity:
        
         
Preferred Stock, $.01 par value, 2,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued  
-
   - 
Common Stock Class A, $.01 par value, 30,000,000 shares authorized, 16,013,173 and 15,958,837 shares issued at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively  
160
   160 
Common Stock Class B, $.01 par value, 7,500,000 shares authorized, 3,040,262 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006  
30
   30 
Additional paid-in capital  
163,074
   162,001 
Retained earnings  
130,329
   130,373 
Treasury Stock, Class A, at cost (3,883,075 and 3,683,075 shares at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively)  (43,766)  (40,048)
Notes receivable from stockholders  (17)  (17)
Total stockholders’ equity  
249,810
   252,499 
         
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
 $
903,555
  $903,367 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)

  
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
  
2007
  2006 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
      
Net income $
106
  $6,459 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:        
Equity in (income) loss of affiliated companies  (366)  559 
Deferred income tax provision  
106
   2,489 
Provision for losses on receivables  
281
   1,041 
Depreciation and amortization  
38,757
   29,398 
Stock-based compensation expense  
787
   301 
Tax benefit realized from stock option plans  (18)  (159)
Loss (gain) on sale of equipment  
214
   (1,730)
Loss on sale and exit of business  
-
   400 
Minority interest expense  
10
   503 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:        
Receivables  (9,896)  10,858 
Prepaid insurance and licenses  
11,833
   8,410 
Operating and installation supplies  
232
   168 
Other assets  (2,444)  792 
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities  
25,288
   (4,963)
Accrued wages and benefits  (1,384)  983 
Net cash provided by operating activities  
63,506
   55,509 
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
        
Payments for purchases of property and equipment  (67,573)  (102,105)
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment  
33,577
   34,353 
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired  (5,655)  (6,806)
Investment in affiliate company  (739)  - 
Net cash used in investing activities  (40,390)  (74,558)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
        
Net borrowings under lines of credit  
1,950
   - 
Net (payments) borrowings under securitization facility  (17,000)  22,000 
Borrowings under long-term debt  
42,896
   32,720 
Payments of long-term debt  (30,790)  (32,578)
Additions to deferred financing costs  
-
   (613)
Book overdraft  (17,329)  (7,804)
Purchase of Class A Common Stock  (3,718)  (1,601)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options  
60
   707 
Tax benefit from stock options  
18
   159 
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net  
184
   179 
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities  (23,729)  13,169 
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents
  (613)  (5,880)
Cash and Cash Equivalents, beginning of period
  
913
   9,488 
Cash and Cash Equivalents, end of period
 $
300
  $3,608 
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
        
Cash paid during the period for interest, net of capitalized interest $
10,692
  $7,569 
Cash (refunded) paid during the period for income taxes, net $(11,391) $9,208 



U.S. XPRESS ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

1.  Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
The interimunaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contained herein reflect all adjustmentsinclude the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned and majority owned subsidiaries.  All significant intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with Article 10 of Regulation S-X promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that inaffect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates, and such differences could be material.  In the opinion of management, the accompanying financial statements include all adjustments that are necessary for a fair statement of the financial condition and results of operations for the interim periods presented. Theypresented, such adjustments being of a normal recurring nature.

Certain information and footnote disclosures have been prepared by U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc. (the "Company"), in accordance with the instructionscondensed or omitted pursuant to Form 10-Q and thesuch rules and regulationsregulations. The December 31, 2018 balance sheet was derived from our audited balance sheet as of the Securities and Exchange Commission and do not include all the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.
Operatingthat date. The Company’s operating results are subject to seasonal trends when measured on a quarterly basis; therefore operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007March 31, 2019 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2007. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of such2019. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been included. Such adjustments consisted only of items that are of a normal recurring nature.
These interim consolidated financial statementsand notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the Company’s latest annual consolidated financial statements (whichand notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Leases
We determine if an arrangement is a lease or contains a lease at inception and perform an analysis to determine whether the lease is an operating lease or a finance lease. We measure right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and lease liabilities at the lease commencement date based on the present value of the remaining lease payments. As most of our leases do not provide a readily determinable implicit rate, we estimate an incremental borrowing rate based on the credit quality of the Company and by comparing interest rates available in the market for similar borrowings, and adjusting this amount based on the impact of collateral over the term of each lease. We use this rate to discount the remaining lease payments in measuring the ROU asset and lease liability. We use the implicit rate when readily determinable. We recognize lease expense for operating leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term. For our finance leases, we recognize amortization expense from the amortization of the ROU asset and interest expense on the related lease liability. We do not separate lease and nonlease components of contracts, except for certain leased information technology assets that are embedded within various service agreements. The lease components included in those agreements are included in the Company’s Form 10-K filedROU asset and lease liability, and the amounts are not significant.

Leases with an initial term of twelve months or less are not recorded on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. We recognize lease expense for these leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2017-04, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment,” which eliminates Step 2 from the goodwill impairment testing process. Step 2 measures a goodwill impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill with the Securitiescarrying amount. Under the new standard, a goodwill impairment loss is measured as the excess of the carrying value of a reporting unit over its fair value. The provisions of this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company has evaluated the provisions of the pronouncement and Exchange Commissiondoes not expect the adoption of ASU 2018-02 will have a material impact on March 16, 2007).the consolidated financial statements.
 
2.  OrganizationRecently Adopted Accounting Standards
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842),” and Operationshas subsequently issued supplemental and/or clarifying ASUs (collectively “ASC 842”), in order to increase transparency and comparability by recognizing lease assets and liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements.  We adopted ASC 842 using the modified retrospective approach and applied the transition provisions with an effective date as of January 1, 2019 for leases that existed on that date. Prior period results continue to be presented under ASC 840 based on the accounting originally in effect for such periods.  We elected the “package of practical expedients” under ASC 842 which permits us to not reassess  our historical assessments of (1) whether contracts are or contain leases, (2) lease classification and (3) initial direct costs. We also elected the practical expedient to not reassess certain land easements.  We did not elect the use-of-hindsight practical expedient during the transition of ASC 842.  Adoption of ASC 842 resulted in the recording of operating lease ROU assets and corresponding operating lease liabilities of approximately $183.0 million.  The adoption of ASC 842 also resulted in increased disclosure, including qualitative and quantitative disclosures about the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases.  See the “Leases” section of this note and Note 6, Leases for additional information.
 
The Company provides transportation services through two business segments: (i) U.S. Xpress, Inc. (“U.S. Xpress”), Arnold Transportation, Inc. (“Arnold”), and Total Transportation of Mississippi LLC (“Total”), comprise our truckload segment, (“Truckload”); and (ii) Xpress Global Systems, Inc. (“Xpress Global Systems”). U.S. Xpress, Arnold, and Total are truckload carriers serving the continental United States and parts of Canada and Mexico. Xpress Global Systems provides transportation, warehousing, and distribution services primarily to the floorcovering industry.
Financial Accounting Standard 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information”, permits for the aggregation of separate operating segments into one reporting segment if they have similar economic characteristics and if the segments are similar in each of the following areas: a) the nature and products of the services, b) the nature of the production process, c) the type or class of customer for their products and services, d) the methods used to distribute their products or provide their services, and e) if applicable, the nature of the regulatory environment. The Company notes U.S. Xpress, Arnold, and Total have these similarities and are consolidated into one reporting segment “Truckload”, while Xpress Global Systems is reported separately.Page 8
3.  Earnings Per Share
The difference in basic and diluted weighted average shares is due to the assumed conversion of outstanding stock options and unvested restricted stock. The computation of basic and diluted earnings per share is as follows:
  
Three Months Ended
June 30,
  
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
  
2007
  
2006
  
2007
  
2006
 
Net Income $
2,735
  $5,724  $
106
  $6,459 
Denominator:                
Weighted average common shares outstanding (in thousands)  
15,155
   15,321   
15,215
   15,323 
Equivalent shares issuable upon exercise of stock options and conversion of unvested restricted stock (in thousands)  
163
   293   
192
   236 
Diluted shares (in thousands)  
15,318
   15,614   
15,407
   15,559 
Earnings per share:                
Basic $
0.18
  $0.37  $
0.01
  $0.42 
Diluted $
0.18
  $0.37  $
0.01
  $0.42 
During the second quarter of 2007, the Company issued 215,600 restricted shares vesting over the next five years.

7


3.Divesture of Xpress Internacional
In January 2019, we sold our 95% interest in Xpress Internacional. The purchase price was approximately $4.5 million in cash, a $6.0 million note receivable and approximately $2.5 million in contingent consideration related to the completion of selling 110 tractors. The fair value of the tractors approximated $2.5 million on January 17, 2019 and has not changed as of March 31, 2019. The business met the criteria for the presentation as held for sale as of December 31, 2018. The assets of business held for sale were not material to our consolidated revenues or consolidated operating income. We recognized an impairment in the amount of $10.7 million in December 2018, related to the disposal group as the carrying value exceeded the fair value.  We did not recognize any subsequent gain or loss during the quarter ended March 31, 2019.
4.Income Taxes
The Company’s provision for income taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 is based on the estimated annual effective tax rate, plus discrete items. The following table presents the provision for income taxes and the effective tax rates for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands):
  Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 
  2019  2018 
Income before Income Taxes $6,920  $1,975 
Income tax provision  1,901   593 
Effective tax rate  27.5%  30.0%
The difference between the Company’s effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 and the US statutory rate of 21% primarily relates to nondeductible expenses, federal income tax credits, state income taxes (net of federal benefit), Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income earned by certain foreign subsidiaries, the effect of taxes on foreign earnings and certain other immaterial discrete items.
5.Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 consists of the following (in thousands):
  
March 31,
2019
  December 31, 2018 
Term loan agreement, interest rate of 4.7% and 4.8% at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively maturing June 2023 $192,500  $195,000 
Revenue equipment installment notes with finance companies, weighted average interest rate of 5.0% and 5.0% at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, due in monthly installments with final maturities at various dates through February 2026, secured by related revenue equipment with a net book value of $188.3 million and $197.1 million in March 2019 and December 2018  176,954   184,867 
Mortgage note payables, interest rates ranging from 5.25% to 6.99% at March 31, 2019 andDecember 31, 2018 due in monthly installments with final maturities as various dates through September 2031, secured by real estate with a net book value of $23.8 million and $24.1 million at March 2019 and December 2018  18,574   18,861 
Other  4,081   6,872 
   392,109   405,600 
Less:  Debt issuance costs  (1,264)  (1,347)
Less:  Current maturities of long-term debt  (86,492)  (106,383)
  $304,353  $297,870 
New Credit Facility

In June 2018, we entered into a new credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) that contains a $150.0 million revolving component (the “Revolving Facility”) and a $200.0 million term loan component (the “Term Facility”). The Credit Facility contains an accordion feature that, so long as no event of default exists, allows us to request an increase in the borrowing amounts under the Revolving Facility or the Term Facility by a combined maximum amount of $75.0 million. Borrowings under the Credit Facility are classified as either “base rate loans” or “Eurodollar rate loans.” Base rate loans accrue interest at a base rate equal to the agent’s prime rate plus an applicable margin that was set at 1.25% through September 30, 2018 and adjusted quarterly thereafter between 0.75% and 1.50% based on our consolidated net leverage ratio. Eurodollar rate loans will accrue interest at London Interbank Offered Rate, or a comparable or successor rate approved by the administrative agent, plus an applicable margin that was set at 2.25% through September 30, 2018 and adjusted quarterly thereafter between 1.75% and 2.50% based on our consolidated net leverage ratio. The Credit Facility requires payment of a commitment fee on the unused portion of the Revolving Facility commitment of between 0.25% and 0.35% based on our consolidated net leverage ratio. In addition, the Revolving Facility includes, within its $150.0 million revolving credit facility, a letter of credit sub facility in an aggregate amount of $75.0 million and a swingline sub facility in an aggregate amount of $15.0 million. The Term Facility has scheduled quarterly principal payments between 1.25% and 2.50% of the original face amount of the Term Facility plus any additional amount borrowed pursuant to the accordion feature of the Term Facility, with the first such payment occurring on the last day of our fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2018.  The Credit Facility will mature on June 18, 2023.
Borrowings under the Credit Facility are prepayable at any time without premium and are subject to mandatory prepayment from the net proceeds of certain asset sales and other borrowings. The Credit Facility is secured by a pledge of substantially all of our assets, excluding, among other things, certain real estate and revenue equipment financed outside the Credit Facility.
The Credit Facility contains restrictive covenants including, among other things, restrictions on our ability to incur additional indebtedness or issue guarantees, to create liens on our assets, to make distributions on or redeem equity interests, to make investments, to transfer or sell properties or other assets and to engage in mergers, consolidations, or acquisitions. In addition, the Credit Facility requires us to meet specified financial ratios and tests, including a maximum leverage ratio and a minimum interest coverage ratio.
At March 31, 2019, the Revolving Facility had issued collateralized letters of credit in the face amount of $31.7 million, with $0 borrowings outstanding and $118.3 million available to borrow and the Term Facility had $192.5 million outstanding.
The Credit Facility includes usual and customary events of default for a facility of this nature and provides that, upon the occurrence and continuation of an event of default, payment of all amounts payable under the Credit Facility may be accelerated, and the Lenders’ commitments may be terminated. At March 31, 2019, the Company was in compliance with all financial covenants prescribed by the Credit Facility.
6.Leases
We have operating and finance leases with terms of 1 year to 10 years for certain revenue and service equipment and office and terminal facilities.
The table below presents the lease-related assets and liabilities recorded on the balance sheet (in thousands):
Leases Classification March 31, 2019 
Assets     
Operating Operating lease right-of-use assets $186,941 
Finance Property and equipment, net  19,921 
Total leased assets   $206,862 
       
Liabilities      
Current      
Operating Current portion of operating lease liabilities $56,893 
Finance Current maturities of long-term debt and finance leases  8,625 
Noncurrent      
Operating Noncurrent operating lease liabilities  129,927 
Finance Long-term debt and finance leases, net of current maturities  8,432 
Total lease liabilities   $203,877 
The table below presents certain information related to the lease costs for finance and operating leases (in thousands):
Lease Cost Classification March 31, 2019 
Operating lease cost Vehicle rents and General and other operating $20,167 
Finance lease cost:      
Amortization of finance lease assets Depreciation and amortization  808 
Interest on lease liabilities Interest expense  318 
Short-term lease cost General and other operating  311 
Total lease cost   $21,604 
Cash Flow Information
 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
2019
 
Cash paid for operating leases included in operating activities $20,167 
Cash paid for finance leases included in operating activities $318 
Cash paid for finance leases included in financing activities $3,155 
     
Operating lease right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations $23,975 
Operating lease right-of-use assets and liabilities relieved in conjunction with divesture of Xpress Internacional $2,018 
Lease Term and Discount Rate
 Weighted-Average Remaining Lease Term (years)  Weighted-Average Discount Rate 
Operating leases  4.1   5.2%
Finance leases  3.4   5.3%
As of March 31, 2019, future maturities of lease liabilities were as follows (in thousands):
  March 31, 2019 
  Finance  Operating 
2019 $4,236  $49,948 
2020  7,544   52,785 
2021  4,084   41,805 
2022  1,427   27,115 
2023  1,427   18,794 
Thereafter  297   17,842 
   19,015   208,289 
Less:  Amount representing interest  (1,958)  (21,469)
Total $17,057  $186,820 
As of December 31, 2018, minimum lease payments under capital and operating leases were as follows (in thousands):
  December 31, 2018 
  Capital  Operating 
2019 $7,797  $60,303 
2020  7,564   42,632 
2021  4,086   35,302 
2022  1,427   20,751 
2023  1,427   15,884 
Thereafter  297   14,080 
   22,598  $188,952 
Less:  Amount representing interest  (2,285)    
   20,313     
Less:  Current portion  (6,711)    
  $13,602     

7. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is party to certain legal proceedings incidental to its business. The ultimate disposition of these matters, in the opinion of management, based in part uponon the advice of legal counsel, is not expected to have a materially adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
For the cases described below, management is unable to provide a meaningful estimate of the possible loss or range of loss because, among other reasons, (1) the proceedings are in various stages; (2) damages have not been sought; (3) damages are unsupported and/or exaggerated; (4) there is uncertainty as to the outcome of the proceedings, including pending appeals; and/or (5) there are significant factual issues to be resolved.  For these cases, however, management does not believe, based on currently available information, that the outcomes of these proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, though the outcomes could be material to our operating results for any particular period, depending, in part, upon the operating results for such period.
California Wage and Hour Class Action Litigation
On December 23, 2015, a class action lawsuit was filed against us and our subsidiary U.S. Xpress, Inc. in the Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino.  The case was transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.  The putative class includes current and former truck drivers employed by us who worked or work in California after the completion of their training while residing in California since December 23, 2011 to present.  The case alleges that class members were not paid for off-the-clock work, were not provided duty free meal or break times, and were not paid premium pay in their absence, were not paid minimum wage for all hours worked, were not provided accurate and complete time and pay records and were not paid all accrued wages at the end of their employment, all in violation of California law.  The class seeks a judgment for compensatory damages and penalties, injunctive relief, attorney fees and costs and pre- and post-judgment interest. The matter is currently in discovery, and a jury trial has been requested. There is currently no trial date set.  We are currently not able to predict the probable outcome or to reasonably estimate a range of potential losses, if any.   We intend to vigorously defend the merits of these claims.
Telephone Consumer Protection Act Claim
A class action was filed against our subsidiary U.S. Xpress, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia on December 11, 2017 and amended on March 7, 2018, alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, for two separate proposed classes. The putative classes include all persons within the United States to whom the Company either initiated a telephone call to a cellular telephone number using an automatic telephone dialing system or initiated a call to a residential telephone number using an artificial or pre-recorded voice at any time from December 11, 2013 to present.  The lawsuit seeks statutory damages for each violation, injunctive relief and attorneys’ fees and costs.  The Company successfully moved to dismiss the claims related to calls made to residential lines on grounds that the plaintiff lacked standing to assert such claims. The Court denied the Company’s Motion to Dismiss claims for all purported class members residing outside the State of Virginia for lack of personal jurisdiction. The matter is currently in discovery and is set for trial beginning January 13, 2020.  We are currently not able to predict the probable outcome or to reasonably estimate a range of potential losses, if any. We intend to vigorously defend the merits of these claims.
Stockholder Claims
As set forth below, between November 2018 and April 2019, eight substantially similar putative securities class action complaints were filed against us and certain other defendants: five in the Circuit Court of Hamilton County, Tennessee (“Tennessee State Court Cases”), two in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee (“Federal Court Cases”), and one in the Supreme Court of the State of New York (“New York State Court Case”).  Two of the Tennessee State Court Cases have been voluntarily dismissed.  All of these matters are in preliminary stages of litigation. We are currently not able to predict the probable outcome or to reasonably estimate a range of potential losses, if any.
On November 21, 2018, a putative class action complaint was filed in the Circuit Court of Hamilton County, Tennessee against us, five of our officers or directors, and the seven underwriters who participated in our June 2018 initial public offering (“IPO”), alleging violations of Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”).  The class action lawsuit is based on allegations that the Company made false and/or misleading statements in the registration statement and prospectus filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") in connection with the IPO.  The lawsuit is purportedly brought on behalf of a putative class of all persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired the Company’s Class A common stock pursuant and/or traceable to the IPO, and seeks, among other things, compensatory damages, costs and expenses (including attorneys’ fees) on behalf of the putative class.
On January 23, 2019, a substantially similar putative class action complaint was filed in the Circuit Court of Hamilton County, Tennessee, by a different plaintiff alleging claims under Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act against the same defendants as in the action commenced on November 21, 2018.  On March 7, 2019, this case was voluntarily dismissed by the plaintiff.
On January 30, 2019, a substantially similar putative class action complaint was filed in the Circuit Court of Hamilton County, Tennessee, by a different plaintiff alleging claims under Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act against the same defendants as in the action commenced on November 21, 2018, and also alleging a claim under Section 12 of the Securities Act.
On February 5, 2019, a substantially similar putative class action complaint was filed in the Circuit Court of Hamilton County, Tennessee, by a different plaintiff alleging claims under Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act against the same defendants as in the action commenced on November 21, 2018, and also alleging a claim under Section 12 of the Securities Act.
On February 6, 2019, a substantially similar putative class action complaint was filed in the Circuit Court of Hamilton County, Tennessee, by different plaintiffs alleging claims under Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act against the same defendants as in the action commenced on November 21, 2018.   On March 19, 2019, this case was voluntarily dismissed by the plaintiff.
On March 8, 2019, a substantially similar putative class action complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee by a different plaintiff alleging claims under Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act against the same defendants as in the action commenced on November 21, 2018.
On March 14, 2019, a substantially similar putative class action complaint was filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, by a different plaintiff alleging claims under Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act against the same defendants as in the action commenced on November 21, 2018.
On April 2, 2019, a substantially similar putative class action complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, by a different plaintiff alleging claims under Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act against us and the same five of our officers and directors as in the action commenced on November 21, 2018.   Unlike the previously filed complaints, this complaint did not name as defendants any of the seven underwriters who participated in our IPO.
The complaints in all the actions listed above allege that the Company made false and/or misleading statements in the registration statement and prospectus filed with the SEC in connection with the IPO, and that, as a result of such alleged statements, the plaintiffs and the members of the putative classes suffered damages.  We believe the allegations made in the complaints are without merit and intend to defend ourselves vigorously in these matters.
Independent Contractor Class Action
On March 26, 2019, a putative class action complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee against us and our subsidiaries U.S. Xpress, Inc. and U.S. Xpress Leasing, Inc.  The putative class includes individuals who performed work as lease operators, who leased equipment from us, and who were designated as independent contractors.  The complaint alleges that independent contractors are improperly designated as such and should be designated as employees and thus subject to the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”).  The complaint further alleges that U.S. Xpress, Inc.’s pay practices with regard to the putative class members violated the minimum wage provisions of the FLSA for the period from March 26, 2016 to present.  The complaint further alleges that we violated the requirements of the Truth in Leasing Act with regard to the independent contractor agreements and lease purchase agreements we entered into with the putative class members.  The complaint further alleges that we failed to comply with the terms of the independent contractor agreements and lease purchase agreements entered into with the putative class members, that we violated the provisions of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act in advertising, describing and marketing the lease purchase program to the putative class members, and that we were unjustly enriched as a result of the foregoing allegations.  The matter is not yet in discovery, and we are currently not able to predict the probable outcome or to reasonably estimate a range of potential losses, if any.  We believe the allegations made in the complaint are without merit and intend to defend ourselves vigorously against the complaints relating to such actions.
The Company had letters of credit of $91,036$31.7 million outstanding at June 30, 2007.as of March 31, 2019. The letters of credit are maintained primarily to support the Company’s insurance program.
The Company currently hashad cancelable commitments outstanding at March 31, 2019 to acquire revenue and communications equipment and development of terminalsreal estate for approximately $84,439 over$201.4 million and during the next 12 months. These revenue equipment commitments are cancelable, subject to certain adjustments in the underlying obligations and benefits.remainder of 2019. These purchase commitments are expected to be financed by long-term debt, operating leases, long-term debt, proceeds from sales of existing equipment, and cash flows from operations.
8.Share-based Compensation
5.  Business Acquisitions2018 Omnibus Incentive Plan
In June 2018, the Board approved the 2018 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan”) to become effective in connection with the offering. The Company has reserved an aggregate of 3.2 million shares of its Class A common stock for issuance of awards under the Incentive Plan. Participants in the Incentive Plan will be selected by the Compensation Committee from the executive officers, directors, employees and consultants of the Company. Awards under the Incentive Plan may be made in the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards, restricted stock units, performance awards, performance units, and any other form established by the Compensation Committee pursuant to the Incentive Plan.
The following is a summary of the Incentive Plan restricted stock and restricted stock unit activity for the three months ended March 31, 2019:
     Weighted 
  Number of  Average Grant 
  Units  Date Fair Value 
Unvested at December 31, 2018  270,742  $14.20 
Granted  461,775   8.94 
Vested  31,845   15.77 
Forfeited  5,500   16.00 
Unvested at March 31, 2019  695,172  $10.62 
The restricted stock grants vest over periods of one to five years. The Company recognized compensation expense of $0.6 million during the three months ended March 31, 2019. At March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company had $6.3 million and $2.8 million in unrecognized compensation expense related to the above restricted stock awards which is expected to be recognized over a period of approximately   3.4 years and 3.3 years, respectively.
The following is a summary of the Incentive Plan stock option activity from December 31, 2018 to March 31, 2019:
     Weighted 
  Number of  Average Grant 
  Units  Date Fair Value 
Unvested at December 31, 2018  177,260  $6.09 
Granted  244,785   4.41 
Unvested at March 31, 2019  422,045  $5.12 
 
In January
Page 15

The stock options vest over a period of 2007,four years and expire ten years from the date of grant. The Company acquired certain assetsrecognized compensation expense of a truckload carrier$0.1 million for a purchase price of $5.6 million in cash.the three months ended March 31, 2019. The assets acquired of approximately $4.8 million related primarily to revenue equipment and other assets. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the assets acquiredstock option grant was recorded as goodwill. The purchase price allocation is preliminary as the Company is still reviewing the valuations of certain assets.
In the fourth quarter of 2004, the Company acquired 49% of the outstanding stock of ATS Acquisition Holding Co. ("ATS"), the parent company of Arnold. In the second quarter of 2005, the Company acquired 49% of the outstanding stock of Transportation Investments Inc. ("TII"), the parent company of Total, and certain affiliated companies (together with TII, the "Total Companies"). Certain members of Arnold’s current management team controlled the remaining 51% interest as well as a majority of the board of directors of ATS, and certain members of the Total management team controlled the remaining 51% interest and a majority of the boards of directors of each of the Total Companies. The Company did not guarantee any of ATS' or the Total Companies' debt and did not have any obligation to provide funding, services, or assets. The Company accounted for ATS' and the Total Companies' operating resultsestimated using the equityBlack-Scholes method of accounting.
On February 28, 2006, the Company increased its ownership interest in both ATS and the Total Companies for approximately $7.9 million in cash. In the transactions, the Company increased its holdings to 80% of the outstanding stock of ATS and the Total Companies through the purchase of stock owned by the current management teams of Arnold and Total. The Arnold and Total management teams continue to hold 20% of the outstanding stock of ATS and the Total Companies, respectively. In connection with these transactions, ATS and the Total Companies became parties to, and guarantors of, the Company's revolving credit facility.
In connection with increasing its investments in ATS and the Total Companies, the Company issued an aggregate of 40,466 shares of restricted stock to key employees of those companies under its 2002 Stock Incentive Plan.  The restricted shares vest over periods up to four years contingent upon continued employment.  The Company recorded compensation expense in accordance with SFAS 123R in relation to these shares.
The above acquisitions are accounted for under the rules of SFAS 141. The Company’s investment to date in ATS and the Total companies totals $21.1 million. The allocation of the purchase cost consisted of $181.5 million in assets, of which $119.9 million is property and equipment, and $182.9 million in liabilities, of which $118.5 million is current and long-term debt. $22.4 million of this investment has been allocated to goodwill. $1.1 million of cash was acquired as of the grant date using the following assumptions:
Strike price $9.40 
Risk-free interest rate  2.50%
Expected dividend yield  0%
Expected volatility  45.65%
Expected term (in years)  6.25 
At March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company had $1.7 million and $0.8 million in unrecognized compensation expense related to the stock option awards which is expected to be recognized over a period of approximately  3.0 years and 3.5 years.
Restricted Stock Units
Prior to the IPO, the Company  provided for restricted membership unit awards in New Mountain Lake under the 2008 Restricted Stock Plan in order to compensate the Company’s employees and to promote the success of the increased investment.Company’s business.
The primary reasons forAs part of the acquisitions andReorganization (see Note 1), all of the principal factors that contributed to the recognitionredeemable restricted units of goodwill are as follows: 1) ATS and the Total Companies compliment the Company’s current presence in the United States by creating a denser capacityNew Mountain Lake were converted into restricted stock units of revenue equipment and drivers and 2) Cost savings are expected through the sharing of best practices within the three companies in addition to increased purchasing power.
Commencing March 1, 2006, the Company, has accounted for its investments in ATS andwith the Total Companies on a consolidated basis. 


same vesting schedules. The following unaudited pro forma financial information presentsis a summary of the Company’s consolidated results of operations for the periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 had the acquisitions of ATS and the Total Companies taken place as of January 1, 2006.

  
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
  
2007
  2006 
Revenue, net of fuel surcharge $
660,838
  $642,936 
Net income (loss)  
106
   6,531 
Earnings (loss) per share - Basic $
0.01
  $0.43 
Earnings (loss) per share - Diluted $
0.01
  $0.42 

In the transactions that increased the Company’s ownership to 80%, the Company also obtained the right to elect a majority of the members of the board of directors of ATS. The Company retains options to purchase the remaining 20% of each of ATS and the Total Companies through December 8, 2007 and October 1, 2008, respectively. If the Company fails to exercise such options prior to such dates, the members of the current Arnold and Total management teams will have similar options to repurchase the Company’s interests in ATS and the Total Companies, respectively.
6.  Equity Investment
In June 2007, the Company indirectly acquired a 40% interest in C&C Trucking of Duncan (“C&C Trucking”) for $739.  Under the agreement, the Company can acquire the remaining 60% interest from 2008 to 2012.  We have accounted for C&C Trucking operating results using the equity method of accounting.
7.  Operating Segments
The Company has two reportable segments based on the types of services it provides to its customers: Truckload (U.S. Xpress, Arnold, and Total), which provides truckload operations throughout the continental United States and parts of Canada and Mexico; and Xpress Global Systems, which provides transportation, warehousing, and distribution services to the floorcovering industry. Substantially all intersegment sales prices are market based. The Company evaluates performance based on operating income of the respective business units.
  
Truckload
  
Xpress Global Systems
  
Consolidated
 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2007
         
Revenue - external customers
 $
374,500
  $
25,847
  $
400,347
 
Intersegment revenue
  
1,173
   
-
   
1,173
 
Operating income
  
8,526
   
1,992
   
10,518
 
Total assets
  
882,222
   
21,333
   
903,555
 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2006            
Revenue - external customers $363,855  $25,607  $389,462 
Intersegment revenue  1,544   -   1,544 
Operating income  13,836   1,694   15,530 
Total assets  782,077   24,299   806,376 
Six Months Ended June 30, 2007
            
Revenue - external customers
 $
712,817
  $
48,403
  $
761,220
 
Intersegment revenue
  
2,369
   
-
   
2,369
 
Operating income
  
7,289
   
3,531
   
10,820
 
Total assets
  
882,222
   
21,333
   
903,555
 
Six Months Ended June 30, 2006            
Revenue - external customers $641,131  $48,040  $689,171 
Intersegment revenue  2,819   -   2,819 
Operating income  18,225   2,063   20,288 
Total assets  782,077   24,299   806,376 
             
The difference in consolidated operating income, as shown above, and consolidated income before income taxes on the consolidated statements of operationsrestricted stock unit activity for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, consists of net interestMarch 31, 2019:
  Number of  Weighted 
  Units  Average 
Unvested at December 31, 2018  1,401,674  $2.00 
Vested  173,320   2.15 
Unvested at March 31, 2019  1,228,354  $1.98 
The vesting schedule for these restricted unit grants range from 3 to 7 years.  The Company recognized compensation expense of $5,482$0.2 million and $4,690, equity in (income) loss of affiliated companies of $(242) and $341 and minority interest of $61 and $365.
The difference in consolidated operating income, as shown above, and consolidated statement of operations for$0.2 million during the sixthree months ended June 30, 2007March 31, 2019 and 2006, respectively, consists2018, respectively. At March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company had approximately $2.0 million and $2.2 million in unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted units, which is expected to be recognized over a period of net interestapproximately 3.7 and 4.1 years, respectively. The fair value of the restricted units and corresponding compensation expense of $10,964 and $7,789, equity in (income) loss of affiliated companies of $(366) and $559, and minority interest of $10 and $503.

was determined using the income approach.
9Page 16


8.  Long-Term Debt
9.Fair Value Measurements

  
June 30,
2007
  
December 31,
2006
 
Obligation under line of credit with a group of banks, maturing March 2011 $
3,650
  $1,700 
Revenue equipment installment notes with finance companies, weighted average interest rate of 6.04% and 5.99% at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively, due in monthly installments with final maturities at various dates through August 2013, secured by related revenue equipment with a net book value of $275.3 million at June 30, 2007 and $265.8 million at December 31, 2006  
277,436
   263,953 
Mortgage note payable, interest rate of 6.73% at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, due in monthly installments through October 2010, with final payment of $6.3 million, secured by real estate with a net book value of $12.8 million at June 30, 2007 and $12.9 million at December 31, 2006  
7,609
   7,782 
Mortgage note payable, interest rate of 6.26% at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, due in monthly installments through December 2030, secured by real estate with a net book value of $15.7 million at June 30, 2007 and $15.9 million at December 31, 2006  
16,556
   16,709 
Mortgage note payable, interest rate of 6.98% at June 30, 2007, maturing August, 2031, secured by real estate with a net book value of $13.5 million at June 30, 2007 and $13.7 million at December 31, 2006  
10,336
   10,416 
Mortgage notes payable, interest rate ranging from 5.0% to 7.25% maturing at various dates through January 2009, secured by real estate with a net book value of $2.9 million at June 30, 2007 and $2.4 million at December 31, 2006  
1,109
   1,204 
Capital lease obligations maturing through September 2008  
838
   1,510 
Other  
56
   260 
   
317,590
   303,534 
Less:  current maturities of long-term debt  (59,010)  (51,221)
  $
258,580
  $252,313 


The Company is party to a $140,000 accounts receivable securitization facility (the "Securitization Facility").  On a revolving basis, the Company sells accounts receivable as part of a two-step securitization transaction that provides the Company with funding similar to a revolving credit facility.  To facilitate this transaction, Xpress Receivables, LLC ("Xpress Receivables"), a bankruptcy-remote, special purpose entity, purchases accounts receivable from U.S. Xpress, Arnold, Total, and Xpress Global Systems.  Xpress Receivables funds these purchases with money borrowed under the Securitization Facility through Three Pillars Funding, LLC.
The borrowings are secured by, and paid down through collections on, the accounts receivable. The Company can borrow up to $140,000 under the Securitization Facility, subject to eligible receivables, and pays interest on borrowings based on commercial paper interest rates, plus an applicable margin, and a commitment fee on the daily, unused portion of the Securitization Facility. The Securitization Facility is reflected as a current liability in the consolidated financial statements because its term, subject to annual renewals, expires October 11, 2007. As of June 30, 2007, the Company’s borrowings under the Securitization Facility were $20,000, with $116,961 available to borrow.
The Securitization Facility requires that certain performance ratios be maintained with respect to accounts receivable and that Xpress Receivables preserve its bankruptcy-remote nature. As of June 30, 2007, the Company was in compliance with the Securitization Facility covenants.
On May 31, 2005, Xpress Global Systems exited the unprofitable airport-to-airport business and conveyed its customer list and a non-compete agreement to a company in exchange for $12,750 in cash.  Following the transaction, Xpress Global Systems continues to provide transportation, warehousing, and distribution services to the floorcovering industry. In connection with the sale and exit of the airport-to-airport business, Xpress Global Systems incurred costs related to the shutdown of certain facilities, including employee severance, the write-off of certain intangible assets, and losses related to the disposal and liquidation of certain assets of the airport-to-airport business.  The following table is a summary of components related to the sale and exit of the airport-to-airport business and the remaining amounts included in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet in other accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities as of June 30, 2007.
  
Severance
  
Future Lease Commitments
  
Other Related Exit Costs
  
Minimum Contractual Amounts
  
Total
 
May 31, 2005 Reserve $400  $5,287  $962  $5,033  $11,682 
2005 Reserve Additions  15   (15)(1)  -   73(1)  73 
2005 Payments  (415)  (3,780)  (797)  (3,268)  (8,260)
December31, 2005 Reserve  -   1,492   165   1,838   3,495 
2006 Reserve Additions  -   305(1)  -   148(1)  453 
2006 Payments  -   (795)  (30)  (476)  (1,301)
December 31, 2006 Reserve  -   1,002   135   1,510   2,647 
2007 Reserve Additions  -   39(1)  -   50(1)  89 
2007 Payments  -   (245)  -   (1,177)  (1,422)
June 30, 2007 Reserve $-  $796  $135  $383  $1,314 

(1)
The component of the minimum contractual amounts liability and future lease commitments liability represents interest accretion and adjustments made to the existing provision.


11.  Income Taxes
Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, (“FIN 48”).  The impact upon adoption was to decrease retained earnings by approximately $169 and to increase our accruals for uncertain tax positions and related interest by a corresponding amount. After recognizing these impacts at adoption of FIN 48, the total unrecognized tax benefits were approximately $2.7 million. Of this amount, approximately $1.2 million would impact our effective tax rate if recognized. The difference results from federal and state tax items that would impact goodwill and would not impact the effective rate if it were subsequently determined that such liability were not required and the indirect deferred tax benefit associated with uncertain tax positions of $0.8 million and $0.7 million, respectively.
The Company regularly evaluates the legal organizational structure and filing requirements of our entities and adjusts tax attributes to enhance planning opportunities. While we are evaluating certain transactions that could reduce the need for certain accruals during fiscal year 2007, those considerations are not yet sufficiently developed to allow further adjustment to existing balances.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal and various state jurisdictions. With few exceptions, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local income tax examinations for years before 2003. In July 2007, the Company was notified by the Internal Revenue Service that its fiscal 2005 and 2006 consolidated federal income tax returns would be audited.  Management believes that all loss exposures are properly accrued in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
The Company recognizes interest related to unrecognized tax benefits in the provision for income taxes. The Company had approximately $540 accrued for the payment of interest as of the date of adoption.
12.  Related Party Transaction
13. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”. SFAS 157 definesdefine fair value, establishesestablish a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosuresexpand disclosure about such fair value measurements. This Statement does not require any newAssets and liabilities measured at fair value measurements; however,are based on one or more of three valuation techniques provided for some entities,in the applicationstandard.
The standards clarify that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset, based on the highest and best use of this Statement will change current practice. SFAS 157the asset, or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants.  As such, fair value is effectivea market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.  As a basis for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating such assumptions, the impact, if any, of SFAS 157 on its consolidated financial statements.standards establish a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs in measuring fair value as follows:
Level 1Inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date.  An active market is defined as a market in which transactions for the assets or liabilities occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, (“SFAS 159”).  SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure certain financial
Level 2Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active (markets with few transactions), inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (i.e., interest rates, yield curves, etc.), and inputs that derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs).
Level 3Unobservable inputs, only used to the extent that observable inputs are not available, reflect the Company’s assumptions about the pricing of an asset or liability.
The following table summarizes liabilities measured at fair value.  Unrealized gainsvalue at March 31, 2019 and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings.  SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.  We are currently assessing the impact of SFAS 159 on our financial statements.December 31, 2018 (in thousands):
14.  Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2006 financial statements to conform to the 2007 presentation.

  2019 
  Fair Value  Input Level 
Liabilities      
Forward Contract $-   3 
     
   2018     
  Fair Value  Input Level 
         
Liabilities        
Forward Contract $1,793   3 
12Page 17

The following table summarizes the changes in the fair value of assets and liabilities measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands):
  Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 
  2019  2018 
Balance at beginning of year $1,793  $1,985 
Divesture of Xpress Internacional  1,793   - 
Forward Contract Adjustment  -   (48)
Balance at end of period $-  $1,937 
At December 31, 2018, the physically settled forward contract was reclassified to long term liabilities associated with assets held for sale and in January 2019 relieved in conjunction with the disposal of Xpress Internacional.
10.Earnings per Share
Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average shares of common stock outstanding during the period, without consideration for common stock equivalents. Prior to the offering, there were no common stock equivalents which could have had a dilutive effect on earnings per share. The Company excluded 989,717 equity awards for the three months ended March 31, 2019 as inclusion would be anti-dilutive.

The basic and diluted earnings per share calculations for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, are presented below (in thousands, except per share amounts):
  Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 
  2019  2018 
Net income $5,019  $1,382 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest  298   223 
Net income attributable to common stockholders $4,721  $1,159 
         
Basic weighted average of outstanding shares of common stock  48,394   6,385 
Dilutive effect of equity awards  997   - 
Diluted weighted average of outstanding shares of common stock  49,391   6,385 
         
Basic earnings per share $0.10  $0.18 
Diluted earnings per share $0.10  $0.18 
11.Segment Information
The Company’s business is organized into two reportable segments, Truckload and Brokerage. The Truckload segment offers asset-based truckload services, including OTR trucking and dedicated contract services. These services are aggregated because they have similar economic characteristics and meet the aggregation criteria described in the accounting guidance for segment reporting. The Company’s OTR service offering provides solo and expedited team services through one-way movements of freight over routes throughout the United States and, prior to the divesture of Xpress Internacional, cross-border into and out of Mexico. The Company’s dedicated contract service offering devotes the use of equipment to specific customers and provides services through long-term contracts. The Company’s dedicated contract service offering provides similar freight transportation services, but does so pursuant to agreements where it makes equipment, drivers and on-site personnel available to a specific customer to address needs for committed capacity and service levels.  During the three months ended March 31, 2019, the Truckload segment accounted for approximately 89% of consolidated revenue.

The Company’s Brokerage segment is principally engaged in non-asset-based freight brokerage services, where it outsources the transportation of loads to third-party carriers. For this segment, the Company relies on brokerage employees to procure third-party carriers, as well as information systems to match loads and carriers. During the three months ended March 31, 2019, the Brokerage segment accounted for approximately 11% of consolidated revenue.
The following table summarizes our segment information (in thousands):

  Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 
  2019  2018 
Revenues      
Truckload $369,119  $371,167 
Brokerage  46,244   54,541 
Total Operating Revenue $415,363  $425,708 
         
Operating Income        
Truckload $9,842  $12,503 
Brokerage  2,796   2,351 
Total Operating Income $12,638  $14,854 
 
A measure of assets is not applicable, as segment assets are not regularly reviewed by the Chief Operating Decision Maker for evaluating performance or allocating resources.

Information about the geographic areas in which the Company conducted business during the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 is summarized below (in thousands). Operating revenues for foreign countries include revenues for (i) shipments with an origin or destination in that country and (ii) other services provided in that country. If both the origin and destination are in a foreign country, the revenues are attributed to the country of origin. In January 2019, we disposed of our Mexican business.
  Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 
  2019  2018 
Revenues      
United States $412,991  $412,852 
Foreign countries        
Mexico  2,372   12,856 
Total $415,363  $425,708 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc., a Nevada corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries. References in this report to “we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company,” and similar expressions refer to U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation.
 
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qreport contains certain statements that may be considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E ofsuch statements are subject to the safe harbor created by those sections and the Private Securities ExchangeLitigation Reform Act of 1934,1995, as amended.   amendedAll statements, other than statements of historical or current fact, are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements, including without limitation: any projections of earnings, revenues or other financial items; any statement of plans, strategies, andoutlook, growth prospects or objectives of management for future operations; our operational and financial targets; general economic trends, performance or conditions and trends in the industry and markets; the competitive environment in which we operate; any statements concerning proposed new services, technologies or developments; and any statement of belief and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. In this Form 10-Q, statements relating to the impact of new accounting standards, future tax rates, expenses, and deductions, expected freight demand, capacity, and volumes, potential results of a default under our Credit Facility or other debt agreements, expected sources of working capital and liquidity (including our mix of debt and lease arrangements as means of financing revenue equipment), future interest expense, expected capital expenditures, expected fleet age and mix of owned versus leased equipment, expected impact of technology, including the impact of event recorders, future customer relationships, future use of dedicated contracts, future growth in independent contractors and related purchased transportation expense and fuel surcharge reimbursement, future growth of our lease-purchase program, future driver market conditions and driver turnover and retention rates, any projections of earnings, revenues, cash flows, dividends, capital expenditures, or other financial items, expected cash flows, expected operating improvements, including improvements in our Adjusted Operating Ratio, Adjusted Operating Income and working capital, any statements regarding future economic conditions or performance; and any statements of belief andperformance, any statement of assumptions underlying anyplans, strategies, and objectives of management for future operations, including the anticipated impact of such plans, strategies, and objectives, future rates and prices, future utilization, future depreciation and amortization, future salaries, wages, and related expenses, including driver compensation, future insurance and claims expense, including the impact of the foregoing. Suchinstallation of event recorders, future fluctuations in fuel costs and fuel surcharge revenue, including the future effectiveness of our fuel surcharge program, strategies for managing fuel costs, future fluctuations in operating expenses and supplies, future fleet size and management, the market value of used equipment, including gain on sale, future residual value guarantees, any statements concerning proposed acquisition plans, new services or developments, the anticipated impact of legal proceedings on our financial position and results of operations, among others, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements may be identified by their use of terms or phrases such as "expects," "estimates," "projects," "believes," "anticipates," "intends,"“believe,” “may,” “could,” “expects,” “estimates,” “projects,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “intends,” and similar terms and phrases.  Such statements are based on currently available operating, financial and competitive information. Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which cannot be predicted or quantified, which could cause future events and actual results to differ materially from those set forth in, contemplated by, or underlying the forward-looking statements.  Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in the section entitled “Item 1A. Risk Factors,” set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018. Readers should review and consider the factors discussed in "Item“Item 1A. Risk Factors,"” set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, as supplemented in Part II below,2018, along with various disclosures in our press releases, stockholder reports, and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.SEC.
 
All such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Form 10-Q.  You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. The CompanyWe expressly disclaimsdisclaim any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in the Company'sour expectations with regard thereto or any change in the events, conditions, or circumstances on which any such statement is based.

Business Overview
We are the fourthfifth largest publicly tradedasset‑based truckload carrier in the United States measured by revenue, according to Transport Topics, a publication of the American Trucking Associations, or ATA. Our primary business is offering a broad range of truckloadgenerating over $1.8 billion in total operating revenue in 2018. We provide services to customersprimarily throughout the United States, with a focus in the densely populated and economically diverse eastern half of the United States. We offer customers a broad portfolio of services using our own truckload fleet and third‑party carriers through our non‑asset‑based truck brokerage network. As of March 31, 2019, our fleet consisted of approximately 6,600 tractors and approximately 15,000 trailers, including approximately 1,900 tractors provided by independent contractors. All of our tractors have been equipped with electronic logs since 2012, and our systems and network are engineered for compliance with the recent federal electronic log mandate. Our terminal network and information technology infrastructure are established and capable of handling significantly larger volumes without meaningful additional investment.
For much of our history, we focused primarily on scaling our fleet and expanding our service offerings to support sustainable, multi-faceted relationships with customers. More recently, we have focused on our core service offerings and refined our network to focus on shorter, more profitable lanes with more density, which we believe are more attractive to drivers. Over the last four years, we have recruited and developed new executive and operational management teams with significant industry experience and instilled a new culture of professional management. These changes, which are ongoing, were reflected in portionsour 2018 and first quarter of Canada2019 financial results where we continue to see earnings improvement as a result of these changes and Mexico.initiatives. We also offer transportation, warehousing,experienced our seventh consecutive quarter of year over year Adjusted Operating Income improvement in the first quarter of 2019 and distribution servicesthe highest adjusted earnings of any first quarter in the history of the Company. For the balance of 2019 we are focused on three main priorities.  The first is optimizing our Truckload network and resulting average revenue per tractor per week through repositioning equipment and allocating capacity between our Dedicated and Over-the-Road segments. The second is improving the experience of our professional truck drivers, including their safety and security. And, the third is advancing our technology initiatives centered on digital load matching, automated load acceptance and prioritization, and our goal of achieving a 100% frictionless order.
Total revenue for the first quarter of 2019 decreased by $10.3 million to $415.4 million as compared to the floorcovering industry. Since becomingfirst quarter of 2018. The decrease was primarily a public company, we have increased our operatingresult of a 15.2% decrease in brokerage revenue to $1.5 billion$46.2 million, and a $2.8 million decrease in 2006 from $215.4fuel surcharge revenue. Excluding the impact of fuel surcharge revenue, first quarter revenue decreased $7.5 million in 1994,to $375.3 million, a compounded annual growth ratedecrease of 17.4%. Our growth has come through expansion of business with new and existing customers and complementary acquisitions. Our operating revenue increased 2.8%2.0% as compared to $400.3 million in the second quarter of 2007 from $389.5 million in the second quarter of 2006. We generated net income of $2.7 million, or $0.18 per diluted share, compared with net income of $5.7 million, or $0.37 per diluted share, in the prior-year period. For the first six months of 2007, the Company reported net income of $0.1 million, or $0.01 per diluted share, compared with net income of $6.5 million, or $0.42 per diluted share, for the prior year period.
In 2006 and continuing into the second quarter of 2007,quarter. Excluding our Xpress Global Systems segment positively impacted the results ofMexico operations, by continued improvement in pricing and yield management, operational efficiencies and reduced overhead expenditures. The divestiture of our unprofitable airport-to-airport business in 2005 also positively impacted our operating results.
Our Truckload Segment
Our truckload segment, U.S. Xpress, Inc. (“U.S. Xpress”), Arnold Transportation, Inc. (“Arnold”), and Total Transportation of Mississippi LLC (“Total”), which comprised approximately 94% of our total operating revenue remained essentially constant compared to the same quarter in 2018 and our revenue excluding fuel surcharge increased $2.9 million or 0.8% compared to the same quarter in 2018.

Operating income for the first quarter of 2019 was $12.6 million compared to the $14.9 million achieved in the secondfirst quarter of 2007, includes2018. Excluding costs related to the following six strategictransition of our Mexico operations, first quarter Adjusted Operating Income was $16.0 million. For the definition of Adjusted Operating Income and a reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, see “Use of Non-GAAP Financial Information.”

We continue to see a limited supply of professional drivers which we believe will limit significant growth during 2019. As a result, we are continuing to focus on our driver centric initiatives, such as increased miles and modern equipment, to both retain the professional drivers who have chosen to partner with us and attract new professional drivers to our team. We will continue to focus on implementing and executing our initiatives that we expect will continue to drive sustainable improved performance over time.

During the balance of 2019, we remain positive as we expect the freight environment to improve seasonally, our network efficiency to rise as we complete the repositioning of equipment from cross-border lanes and the productivity of our operations to benefit from our many internal initiatives including our goal of achieving a frictionless order.
Reportable Segments
Our business units, eachis organized into two reportable segments, Truckload and Brokerage. Our Truckload segment offers truckload services, including over-the-road (“OTR”) trucking and dedicated contract services. Our OTR service offering transports a full trailer of whichfreight for a single customer from origin to destination, typically without intermediate stops or handling pursuant to short‑term contracts and spot moves that include irregular route moves without volume and capacity commitments. Tractors are operated with a solo driver or, when handling more time‑sensitive, higher‑margin freight, a team of two drivers. Our dedicated contract service offering provides similar freight transportation services, but with contractually assigned equipment, drivers and on‑site personnel to address customers’ needs for committed capacity and service levels pursuant to multi‑year contracts with guaranteed volumes and pricing. Our Brokerage segment is significantprincipally engaged in its market:
U.S. Xpress dedicated
Our approximately 1,400 tractor dedicated unit offers our customers dedicated equipment, drivers, and on-site personnel to address customers’ needs for committed capacity and service levels, while affording us consistent equipment utilization during the contract term.
U.S. Xpress regional and solo over-the-road
Our approximately 3,400 tractor regional and solo over-the-road unit offers our customers a high level of service in dense freight markets of the Southeast, Midwest, and West, in addition to providing nationwide coverage.
U.S. Xpress expedited intermodal rail
Our railroad contracts for high-speed train service enable us to provide our customers incremental capacity and transit times comparable to solo-driver service in medium-to-long haul markets, while lowering our costs.
U.S. Xpress expedited team
Our approximately 700 team driver unit offers our customers a service advantage over medium-to-long haul rail and solo-driver truck service at a much lower cost than airfreight, while affording us premium rates and improved utilization of equipment.
Arnold
Arnold is a dry van truckload carrier headquartered in Florida with approximately 1,600 trucks, and offers regional, dedicated, and medium length-of-haul service primarily in the Northeast, Southeast, and Southwest United States.
Total
Total is a dry van truckload carrier headquartered in Mississippi with approximately 600 trucks, and offers regional, dedicated, and medium length-of-haul services primarily in the Eastern United States.
non‑asset‑based freight brokerage services, where loads are contracted third‑party carriers.
13Page 22

Truckload Segment

During the second quarter of 2007,In our truckloadTruckload segment, experienced an operating income of $8.5 million compared to operating income of $13.8 million in the same period in 2006. The primary reason for the decrease in earnings was a decline in asset utilization, evidenced by a 4.0% decline in average freight revenue per tractor per week.  Lower freight demand and a difficult pricing environment negatively impacted our truckload business.
Our truckload segment primarily generateswe generate revenue by transporting freight for our customers in our OTR and dedicated contract service offerings. Our OTR service offering provides solo and expedited team services through one way movements of freight over routes throughout the United States and prior to the divesture of our Mexico business, cross border into and out of Mexico. Our dedicated contract service offering devotes the use of equipment to specific customers and provides services through long term contracts. Our Truckload segment provides services that are geographically diversified but have similar economic and other relevant characteristics, as they all provide truckload carrier services of general commodities and durable goods to similar classes of customers. Generally, we
We are typically paid a predetermined rate per load or per mile for our truckloadTruckload services. We enhance our truckload revenue by charging for tractor and trailer detention, loading and unloading activities and other specialized services,services. Consistent with industry practice, our typical customer contracts (other than those contracts in which we have agreed to dedicate certain tractor and trailer capacity for use by specific customers) do not guarantee load levels or tractor availability. This gives us and our customers a certain degree of flexibility to negotiate rates up or down in response to changes in freight demand and trucking capacity. In our dedicated contract service offering, which comprised approximately 37.5% of our Truckload operating revenue, and approximately 38.0% of our Truckload revenue, before fuel surcharge, for 2018, we provide service under contracts with fixed terms, volumes and rates. Dedicated contracts are often used by our customers with high service and high priority freight, sometimes to replace private fleets previously operated by them.
Generally, in our Truckload segment, we receive fuel surcharges on the miles for which we are compensated by customers. Fuel surcharge revenue mitigates the effect of price increases over a negotiated base rate per gallon of fuel; however, these revenues may not fully protect us from all fuel price increases. Our fuel surcharges to customers may not fully recover all fuel increases due to engine idle time, out of route miles and non revenue generating miles that are not generally billable to the customer, as well as throughto the collectionextent the surcharge paid by the customer is insufficient. The main factors that affect fuel surcharge revenue are the price of diesel fuel and the number of revenue miles we generate. Although our surcharge programs vary by customer, we generally attempt to negotiate an additional penny per mile charge for every five cent increase in the U.S. Department of Energy’s (the “DOE”) national average diesel fuel index over an agreed baseline price. Our fuel surcharges to mitigate the impact of increasesare billed on a lagging basis, meaning we typically bill customers in the costcurrent week based on a previous week’s applicable index. Therefore, in times of increasing fuel prices, we do not recover as much as we are currently paying for fuel. In periods of declining prices, the opposite is true. Based on the current status of our empty miles percentage and the fuel efficiency of our tractors, we believe that our fuel surcharge recovery is effective.
The main factors that affect our truckloadoperating revenue in our Truckload segment are the average revenue per mile we receive from our customers, the percentage of miles for which we are compensated and the number of shipments and miles we generate. These factors relate, among other things, to the general level of economic activity in the United States, inventory levels, specific customer demand, the level of capacity in the trucking industry, and driver availability. Our primary measures of revenue generation for our truckload businessTruckload segment are average revenue per loaded mile and average revenue per tractor per week,period, in each case excluding fuel surcharge revenue. Average revenue per loaded mile, beforeand revenue and miles from services in Mexico.
In our Truckload segment, our most significant operating expenses vary with miles traveled and include (i) fuel, surcharge revenue, decreased slightly to $1.612 during the second quarter of 2007 from $1.616 in the second quarter of 2006. Average revenue per tractor per week, before fuel surcharge revenue, decreased to $2,996 during the second quarter of 2007 from $3,121 in the second quarter of 2006 (excluding rail revenue).
The main factors that impact our profitability in terms of expenses are the variable costs of transporting freight for our customers. These costs include fuel expense, driver-related(ii) driver related expenses, such as wages, benefits, training and recruitment and purchased transportation expenses, which include compensating(iii) costs associated with independent contractors and providers of expedited intermodal rail services.(which are primarily included in the “Purchased transportation” line item). Expenses that have both fixed and variable components include maintenance and tire expense and our total cost of insurance and claims. These expenses generally vary with the miles we travel, but also have a controllable component based on safety, fleet age, efficiency and other factors. Our main fixed costs include rentalsvehicle rent and depreciation of long-termlong term assets, such as revenue equipment and terminalservice center facilities, and the compensation of non-driver personnel.
Our Xpress Global Systems Segment
non driver personnel and other general and administrative expenses.
Our Xpress Global SystemsTruckload segment requires substantial capital expenditures for purchase of new revenue equipment. We use a combination of operating leases and secured financing to acquire tractors and trailers, which comprised approximately 6%we refer to as revenue equipment. When we finance revenue equipment acquisitions with operating leases, we  record an operating lease right of use asset and an operating lease liability on our consolidated balance sheet, and the lease payments in respect of such equipment are reflected in our consolidated statement of comprehensive income in the line item “Vehicle rents.” When we finance revenue equipment acquisitions with secured financing, the asset and liability are recorded on our consolidated balance sheet, and we record expense under “Depreciation and amortization” and “Interest expense.” Typically, the aggregate monthly payments are similar under operating lease financing and secured financing. We use a mix of finance leases and operating leases with individual decisions being based on competitive bids, tax projections and contractual restrictions. Because of the inverse relationship between vehicle rents and depreciation and amortization, we review both line items together.
Approximately 26.4% of our total tractor fleet was operated by independent contractors at March 31, 2019. Independent contractors provide a tractor and a driver and are responsible for all of the costs of operating their equipment and drivers, including interest and depreciation, vehicle rents, driver compensation, fuel and other expenses, in exchange for a fixed payment per mile or percentage of revenue per invoice plus a fuel surcharge pass through. Payments to independent contractors are recorded in the second quarter“Purchased transportation” line item. When independent contractors increase as a percentage of 2007, offersour total tractor fleet, our “Purchased transportation” line item typically will increase, with offsetting reductions in employee driver wages and related expenses, net of fuel (assuming all other factors remain equal). The reverse is true when the percentage of our total fleet operated by company drivers increases.
Brokerage Segment
In our Brokerage segment, we retain the customer relationship, including billing and collection, and we outsource the transportation warehousing,of the loads to third‑party carriers. For this segment, we rely on brokerage employees to procure third‑party carriers, as well as information systems to match loads and distribution servicescarriers.
Our Brokerage segment revenue is mainly affected by the rates we obtain from customers, the freight volumes we ship through our third‑party carriers and our ability to secure third‑party carriers to transport customer freight. We generally do not have contracted long‑term rates for the floorcovering industry. Duringcost of third‑party carriers, and we cannot assure that our results of operations will not be adversely impacted in the second quarterfuture if our ability to obtain third‑party carriers changes or the rates of 2007,such providers increase.
The most significant expense of our Xpress Global SystemsBrokerage segment, experiencedwhich is primarily variable, is the cost of purchased transportation that we pay to third‑party carriers, and is included in the “Purchased transportation” line item. This expense generally varies depending upon truckload capacity, availability of third‑party carriers, rates charged to customers and current freight demand and customer shipping needs. Other operating expenses are generally fixed and primarily include the compensation and benefits of non‑driver personnel (which are recorded in the “Salaries, wages and benefits” line item) and depreciation and amortization expense.
The key performance indicator in our Brokerage segment is gross margin percentage (which is calculated as brokerage revenue less purchased transportation expense expressed as a percentage of total operating revenue). Gross margin percentage can be impacted by the rates charged to customers and the costs of securing third‑party carriers.
Our Brokerage segment does not require significant capital expenditures and is not asset intensive like our Truckload segment.
Use of Non‑GAAP Financial Information
In addition to our net income and operating ratio determined in accordance with GAAP, we evaluate operating performance using certain non-GAAP measures, including Adjusted Operating Income We define Adjusted Operating Income as revenue less operating expenses, net of Mexico transition costs. We believe our presentation of Adjusted Operating Income is useful because it provides investors and securities analysts the same information that we use internally to assess our core operating performance.

The non-GAAP information provided is used by our management and may not be comparable to similar measures disclosed by other companies, because of differing methods used by other companies in calculating Adjusted Operating Income. The non-GAAP measures used herein have limitations as analytical tools, and you should not consider them in isolation or as substitutes for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Management compensates for these limitations by relying primarily on GAAP results and using non-GAAP financial measures on a supplemental basis.

The table below compares our GAAP operating income to our non‑GAAP Adjusted Operating Income.
  Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 
  2019  2018 
Consolidated GAAP Presentation 
(dollars in thousands)
 
Total operating revenue $415,363  $425,708 
Total operating expenses  402,725   410,854 
Operating Income $12,638  $14,854 
         
         
Consolidated Non-GAAP Presentation        
Total operating revenue $415,363  $425,708 
Fuel Surcharge  (40,051)  (42,850)
Revenue, before fuel surcharge  375,312   382,858 
Total operating expenses  402,725   410,854 
Adjusted for:        
Fuel Surcharge  (40,051)  (42,850)
Mexico transition costs  (3,400)   
Adjusted total operating expenses  359,274   368,004 
Adjusted Operating Income $16,038  $14,854 
Results of $2.0 million, compared to $1.7 million in the same period in 2006.Operations
Revenue
Xpress Global Systems primarily generatesWe generate revenue byfrom two primary sources: transporting less-than-truckload freight for our customers. Generally, wecustomers (including related fuel surcharge revenue) and arranging for the transportation of customer freight by third‑party carriers. We have two reportable segments: our Truckload segment and our Brokerage segment. Truckload revenue, before fuel surcharge and truckload fuel surcharge are paid a predetermined rate per square yard for carpetprimarily generated through trucking services provided by our two Truckload service offerings (OTR and per pound for all other commodities. The rates vary based on miles, type of service and type ofdedicated contract). Brokerage revenue is primarily generated through brokering freight we are hauling. We enhance our less-than-truckloadto third‑party carriers.
Our total operating revenue is affected by charging for storage, warehousing and other specialized services, as well as through the collection of fuel surcharges to mitigate the impact of increases in the cost of fuel. The maincertain factors that affect our less-than-truckload revenue are the revenue per pound we receive from our customers, the average weight per shipment we haul and the number of shipments we generate. These factors relate to, among other things, to the general level of economic activity in the United States, especially in the housing industry,customer inventory levels, specific customer demand, the level of capacity in the truckingtruckload and brokerage industry, the success of our marketing and driver availability. Our primary measures of revenue generation for our less-than-truckload business are average revenue per pound (excluding fuel surcharge revenue), total tonnage and number of loads hauled per day.
The main factors that impact our profitability in terms of expenses are the variable costs of transporting the freight for our customers. These costs include purchased transportation, fuel expensesales efforts and the cost paid toavailability of drivers, independent contractors and third‑party carriers.
A summary of our agents to deliverrevenue generated by type for the freight. Expenses that have both fixedthree months ended March 31, 2019 and variable components include driver and dock related expenses, such2018 is as wages, benefits, training, and recruitment, maintenance and tire expense andfollows:
  Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 
  2019  2018 
  (dollars in thousands) 
Revenue before fuel surcharge $375,312  $382,858 
Fuel surcharge  40,051   42,850 
Total operating revenue $415,363  $425,708 
          
For the quarter ended March 31, 2019, our total cost of insuranceoperating revenue decreased by $10.3 million, or 2.4%, compared to the same quarter in 2018, and claims. These expenses generally vary with the miles we travel and the tonnage of freight we handle, but also have a controllable component based on load factor, safety, fleet age, efficiency and other factors. Our main fixed costs include rentals and depreciation of long-term assets, such as revenue equipment and terminal facilities and the compensation of non-driver and non-dock worker personnel.


Revenue and Expenses
The primary measure we use to evaluate our profitability is operating ratio (operating expenses, net of fuel surcharge, as a percentage of revenue, before fuel surcharge)surcharge decreased by $7.5 million, or 2.0%. OurExcluding our Mexico operations, our total operating ratio was 97.0% in the second quarter of 2007,revenue remained essentially constant compared to 95.3%the same quarter in 2018 and our revenue excluding fuel surcharge increased $2.9 million or 0.8% compared to the secondsame quarter of 2006.
Revenue Equipment
At June 30, 2007, we had a truckload fleet of 7,698 tractors including 1,016 owner-operator tractors.  We also operated 22,289 trailers in our truckload fleet and approximately 200 tractors dedicated to local and drayage services.  At Xpress Global Systems, we operated 188 pickup and delivery tractors and 429 trailers.
Consolidated Results of Operations
2018. The following table sets forthprimary factors driving the percentage relationships of expense items toincreases in total operating revenue and revenue, excludingbefore fuel surcharge, excluding our Mexico operations, were improved pricing in our Truckload segment combined with increased miscellaneous revenues, partially offset by decreased volumes and pricing in our Brokerage segment and decreased fuel surcharge revenues. While we are not seeing the same opportunities in the spot market in 2019 compared to 2018, we expect contract rates to continue to increase sequentially during the remainder of 2019 and to outpace cost inflation, absent changes in the macroeconomic environment.
A summary of our revenue generated by segment for eachthe three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 is as follows:
  Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 
  2019  2018 
  (dollars in thousands) 
Truckload revenue, before fuel surcharge $329,068  $328,317 
Fuel surcharge  40,051   42,850 
Total Truckload revenue  369,119   371,167 
Brokerage revenue  46,244   54,541 
Total operating revenue $415,363  $425,708 
  
The following is a summary of our key Truckload segment performance indicators, before fuel surcharge and excluding miles from services in Mexico, for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018. Average tractors, average company‑owned tractors and average independent contractor tractors exclude tractors in Mexico.
  Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 
  2019  2018 
Over the road      
Average revenue per tractor per week $3,616  $3,850 
Average revenue per mile $1.985  $1.972 
Average revenue miles per tractor per week  1,822   1,952 
Average tractors  3,617   3,622 
Dedicated        
Average revenue per tractor per week $3,961  $3,544 
Average revenue per mile $2.337  $2.183 
Average revenue miles per tractor per week  1,695   1,623 
Average tractors  2,658   2,623 
Consolidated        
Average revenue per tractor per week $3,762  $3,721 
Average revenue per mile $2.128  $2.051 
Average revenue miles per tractor per week  1,768   1,814 
Average tractors  6,275   6,245 
For the quarter ended March 31, 2019, our Truckload revenue, before fuel surcharge increased by $0.8 million, or 0.2%, compared to the same quarter in 2018. Excluding our Mexico operations, Truckload revenue before fuel surcharge increased $11.2 million or 3.6%. The primary factors driving the increase in Truckload revenue were a 3.8% increase in revenue per loaded mile due to increased contract rates, a slight increase in average available tractors, an increase of $8.5 million in miscellaneous revenue, partially offset by 2.5% decrease in average revenue miles per tractor.  Fuel surcharge revenue decreased by $2.8 million, or 6.5%, to $40.1 million, compared with $42.9 million in the same quarter in 2018. The Department of Energy (“DOE”) national weekly average fuel price per gallon remained essentially constant for the quarter ended March 31, 2019 compared to the same quarter in 2018. The decrease in fuel surcharge revenue primarily relates to decreased revenue miles of 2.7% compared to the same quarter in 2018.
The key performance indicator of our Brokerage segment is gross margin percentage (brokerage revenue less purchased transportation expense expressed as a percentage of total operating revenue). Gross margin percentage can be impacted by the rates charged to customers and the costs of securing third‑party carriers. The following table lists the gross margin percentage for our Brokerage segment for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018.
  Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 
  2019  2018 
Gross margin percentage  17.5%  14.0%
          
For the quarter ended March 31, 2019, our Brokerage revenue decreased by $8.3 million, or 15.2%, compared to the same quarter in 2018. The primary factors driving the decrease in Brokerage revenue were a 13.8% decrease in load count combined with a 1.6% decrease in average revenue per load. Average revenue per load decreased due to non-contracted spot rates declining more than 20.0%. We experienced an increase in our gross margin to 17.5% in the first quarter of 2019 compared to 14.0% in the same period of the periods indicated below. prior year as a result of sourcing third party capacity more efficiently.
Operating Expenses
For comparison purposes in the discussion below, we use total operating revenue and revenue, before fuel surcharge when discussing changes as a percentage of revenue. As it relates to the comparison of expenses to revenue, before fuel surcharge, we believe that removing fuel surcharge revenue, which is sometimes a volatile source of revenue affords a more consistent basis for comparing the results of operations from period‑to‑period.
Individual expense line items as a percentage of total operating revenue also are affected by fluctuations in the percentage of our revenue generated by independent contractor and brokerage loads.
Salaries, Wages and Benefits
Salaries, wages and benefits consist primarily of compensation for all employees. Salaries, wages and benefits are primarily affected by the total number of miles driven by company drivers, the rate per mile we pay our company drivers, employee benefits such as health care and workers’ compensation, and to a lesser extent by the number of, and compensation and benefits paid to, non‑driver employees.
The following is a summary of our salaries, wages and benefits for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018:
  Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 
  2019  2018 
  (dollars in thousands) 
Salaries, wages and benefits $124,563  $132,924 
% of total operating revenue  30.0%  31.2%
% of revenue, before fuel surcharge  33.2%  34.7%
For the quarter ended March 31, 2019, salaries, wages and benefits decreased $8.4 million, or 6.3%, compared with the same quarter in 2018. This decrease in absolute dollar terms was due primarily to $4.5 million of lower driver wages as our company driver miles decreased 12.6% as compared to the same quarter in 2018, due primarily to independent contractor miles comprising a greater percentage of our miles. Our OTR driver pay on a per mile basis increased as a result of higher incentive-based pay as compared to the same quarter in 2018. Our office wages decreased primarily due to the divesture of our Mexico business. During the three months ended March 31, 2019, our workers’ compensation expense and group health claims expense decreased approximately 21.4%, due to positive trends in our workers’ compensation claims, partially offset by increased group health claims expense as compared to the same quarter in 2018. In the near term, we believe salaries, wages and benefits will increase as a result of a tight driver market, wage inflation and higher healthcare costs. As a percentage of revenue, we expect salaries, wages and benefits will fluctuate based on our ability to generate offsetting increases in average revenue per total mile and the percentage of revenue generated by independent contractors and brokerage operations, for which payments are reflected in the “Purchased transportation” line item.
Fuel and Fuel Taxes
Fuel and fuel taxes consist primarily of diesel fuel expense and fuel taxes for our company‑owned and leased tractors. The primary factors affecting our fuel and fuel taxes expense are the cost of diesel fuel, the miles per gallon we realize with our equipment and the number of miles driven by company drivers.
We believe that the most effective protection against net fuel cost increases in the near term is to maintain an effective fuel surcharge program and to operate a fuel‑efficient fleet by incorporating fuel efficiency measures, such as auxiliary heating units, installation of aerodynamic devices on tractors and trailers and low‑rolling resistance tires on our tractors, engine idle limitations and computer‑optimized fuel‑efficient routing of our fleet.
The following is a summary of our fuel and fuel taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018:
  Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 
  2019  2018 
  (dollars in thousands) 
Fuel and fuel taxes $46,904  $58,389 
% of total operating revenue  11.3%  13.7%
% of revenue, before fuel surcharge  12.5%  15.3%
For the quarter ended March 31, 2019, fuel and fuel taxes decreased $11.5 million, or 19.7%, compared with the same quarter in 2018. The decrease in fuel and fuel taxes was primarily the result of a 12.6% decrease in company driver miles, a $2.5 million decrease due to the divesture of our Mexico business, and a 2.9% increase in our average miles per gallon compared to the same quarter in 2018. The average DOE fuel price per gallon remained essentially constant for the quarter ended March 31, 2019, compared to the same quarter in 2018.
To measure the effectiveness of our fuel surcharge program, we calculate “net fuel expense” by subtracting fuel surcharge revenue (other than the fuel surcharge revenue we reimburse to independent contractors, which is included in purchased transportation) from our fuel expense. Our net fuel expense as a percentage of revenue, before fuel surcharge, is calculated usingaffected by the cost of diesel fuel and fuel taxes, net of fuel surcharge. Management believes that eliminatingsurcharge collection, the impactpercentage of this sourcemiles driven by company tractors and our percentage of non‑revenue provides a more consistent basisgenerating miles, for comparing results of operations from period to period.
  
(Total operating revenue)
Three Months Ended
June 30,
  
(Revenue, before fuel surcharge)
Three Months Ended
June 30,
  
(Total operating revenue)
Six Months Ended
June 30,
  
(Revenue, before fuel surcharge)
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
  
2007
  
2006
  
2007
  
2006
  
2007
  
2006
  
2007
  
2006
 
Operating Revenue
  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%
                                 
Operating Expenses:
                                
Salaries, wages and benefits  
33.4
   32.6   
38.8
   38.3   
34.2
   33.4   
39.5
   38.7 
Fuel and fuel taxes  
23.2
   22.9   
10.7
   9.5   
22.7
   22.6   
11.0
   10.2 
Vehicle rents  
6.2
   5.0   
7.2
   5.8   
6.3
   5.5   
7.2
   6.4 
Depreciation and amortization, net of gain on sale  
4.9
   4.1   
5.7
   4.8   
5.1
   4.0   
5.9
   4.7 
Purchased transportation  
15.1
   15.8   
17.6
   18.6   
15.1
   15.7   
17.4
   18.2 
Operating expense and supplies  
6.1
   6.4   
7.1
   7.5   
6.3
   6.4   
7.3
   7.4 
Insurance premiums and claims  
4.0
   4.2   
4.6
   4.9   
4.1
   4.3   
4.7
   5.0 
Operating taxes and licenses  
1.1
   1.1   
1.3
   1.3   
1.2
   1.2   
1.3
   1.3 
Communications and utilities  
0.7
   0.9   
0.8
   1.1   
0.8
   0.9   
0.9
   1.1 
General and other operating  
2.7
   2.9   
3.2
   3.4   
2.8
   3.0   
3.2
   3.5 
 Loss on sale and exit of business  
0.0
   0.1   
0.0
   0.1   
0.0
   0.1   
0.0
   0.1 
Total operating expenses  
97.4
   96.0   
97.0
   95.3   
98.6
   97.1   
98.4
   96.6 
                                 
Income from Operations
  
2.6
   4.0   
3.0
   4.7   
1.4
   2.9   
1.6
   3.4 
                                 
Interest expense, net  
1.4
   1.2   
1.6
   1.4   
1.4
   1.1   
1.7
   1.3 
Equity in (income) loss of affiliated companies  (0.1)  0.1   (0.1)  0.1   
0.0
   0.1   (0.1)  0.1 
Minority interest  
0.0
   0.1   
0.0
   0.1   
0.0
   0.1   
0.0
   0.1 
   
1.3
   1.4   
1.5
   1.6   
1.4
   1.3   
1.6
   1.5 
                                 
Income before income taxes  
1.3
   2.6   
1.5
   3.1   
0.0
   1.6   
0.0
   1.9 
                                 
Income tax provision  
0.6
   1.1   
0.7
   1.3   
0.0
   0.7   
0.0
   0.8 
                                 
Net Income
  0.7%  1.5%  0.8%  1.8%  0.0%  0.9%  0.0%  1.1%

There are minor rounding differences in the above table.


Comparison of the Three Months ended June 30, 2007 to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2006
Total operating revenue increased 2.8% to $400.3 million during the three months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $389.5 million during the same period in 2006.  The increase resulted primarily from an increase in average number of seated trucks to 7,676 in the second quarter of 2007 compared to 6,943 in the second quarter of 2006 offset by 4.0% reduction in revenue per tractor and decreased rail volumes.
Revenue, beforewhich we do not receive fuel surcharge, increased 3.7% to $344.3 million during the three months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $332.0 million during the same period in 2006.  Truckload revenue, before revenues. Net fuel surcharge, increased 3.8% to $319.6 million during the three months ended June 30, 2007, compared to $307.9 million during the same period in 2006expense as a result of an increase in average seated trucks to 7,676 in the second quarter of 2007 compared to 6,943 in the second quarter of 2006 partially offset by 4.0% reduction in revenue per tractor and decreased rail volumes. Xpress Global Systems’ revenue increased 0.8% to $25.8 million during the three months ended June 30, 2007, compared to $25.6 million during the same period in 2006.  Intersegment revenue decreased to $1.2 million during the three months ended June 30, 2007, compared to $1.5 million during the same period in 2006.
Salaries, wages and benefits increased 5.1% to $133.6 million during the three months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $127.1 million during the same period in 2006.  The increase was primarily due to an increase of 7.6% in U.S. Xpress driver wages due to a 6.5% increase in U.S. Xpress company miles and a decrease in expedited rail volume partially offset by a decrease in local driver wages due to a reduction in tractors dedicated to local and drayage services.  Tractors dedicated to local and drayage services will fluctuate consistent with rail volumes.  As a percentage of revenue, before fuel surcharge, salaries, wages,is shown below:
  Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 
  2019  2018 
  (dollars in thousands) 
Fuel surcharge revenue $40,051  $42,850 
Less: fuel surcharge revenue reimbursed to independent contractors  10,480   7,956 
Company fuel surcharge revenue  29,571   34,894 
Total fuel and fuel taxes $46,904  $58,389 
Less: company fuel surcharge revenue  29,571   34,894 
Net fuel expense $17,333  $23,495 
% of total operating revenue  4.2%  5.5%
% of revenue, before fuel surcharge  4.6%  6.1%
For the quarter ended March 31, 2019, net fuel expense decreased $6.2 million, or 26.2%, compared with the same quarter in 2018. During the quarter ended March 31, 2019, the decrease in net fuel expenses was primarily the result of a $2.5 million decrease due to the divesture of our Mexico business, 2.9% increase in average miles per gallon, and benefits increaseda decrease in the fuel surcharge per mile paid to 38.8%independent contractors. Independent contractors accounted for 25.4% of the three months ended June 30, 2007,average tractors available compared to 38.3% during17.5% in the same period in 2006.
Fuel and fuel taxes, net of fuel surcharge, increased 16.4% to $36.9 million during the three months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $31.7 million during the same period in 2006.  Such increase is mainly due to a 6.5% increase in U.S. Xpress company miles combined with decreased expedited rail volumes during the second quarter of 2007 compared2018. In the near term, our net fuel expense is expected to the same period in 2006. Fuel surcharges paid to the railroad are reflected in purchased transportation. Asfluctuate as a percentage of total operating revenue and revenue, before fuel surcharge, based on factors such as diesel fuel prices, the percentage recovered from fuel surcharge programs, the percentage of uncompensated miles, the percentage of revenue generated by independent contractors, the percentage of revenue generated by team‑driven tractors (which tend to generate higher miles and lower revenue per mile, thus proportionately more fuel taxes increased to 10.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2007, compared to 9.5% during the same period in 2006.cost as a percentage of revenue).
 
Vehicle Rents and Depreciation and Amortization
Vehicle rents increased 27.5% to $24.6 million during consist primarily of payments for tractors and trailers financed with operating leases. The primary factors affecting this expense item include the three months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $19.3 million duringsize and age of our tractor and trailer fleets, the same period in 2006. This increase is duecost of new equipment and the relative percentage of owned versus leased equipment.
Depreciation and amortization consists primarily toof depreciation for owned tractors and trailers. The primary factors affecting these expense items include the increase insize and age of our tractor and trailer fleets, the average numbercost of tractors financed undernew equipment and the relative percentage of owned equipment and equipment acquired through debt or finance leases versus equipment leased through operating leases. We use a mix of finance leases and operating leases to 4,160 during the second quarter of 2007 compared to 3,200 for the same period in 2006.  As a percentage offinance our revenue before fuel surcharge, vehicle rents increased to 7.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2007, compared to 5.8% during the same period in 2006.
Depreciationequipment with individual decisions being based on competitive bids and amortization increased 22.8% to $19.4 million during the three months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $15.8 million during the same period in 2006.  Gains/tax projections. Gains or losses realized on the sale of owned revenue equipment are included in depreciation and amortization for reporting purposes. Depreciation
Vehicle rents and depreciation and amortization excluding gain/losses, increased to $19.2 million duringare closely related because both line items fluctuate depending on the relative percentage of owned equipment and equipment acquired through finance leases versus equipment leased through operating leases. Vehicle rents increase with greater amounts of equipment acquired through operating leases, while depreciation and amortization increases with greater amounts of owned equipment and equipment acquired through finance leases. Because of the inverse relationship between vehicle rents and depreciation and amortization, we review both line items together.
The following is a summary of our vehicle rents and depreciation and amortization for the three months ended June 30, 2007March 31, 2019 and 2018:
  Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 
  2019  2018 
  (dollars in thousands) 
Vehicle Rents $18,976  $20,022 
Depreciation and amortization, net of (gains) losses on sale of property  23,062   24,706 
Vehicle Rents and Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment $42,038  $44,728 
% of total operating revenue  10.1%  10.5%
% of revenue, before fuel surcharge  11.2%  11.7%
For the quarter ended March 31, 2019, vehicle rents decreased $1.0 million, or 5.2%, compared to $16.6 million during the same periodquarter in 2006.  This increase2018. The decrease in vehicle rents was primarily due to a decrease in the short term trailer rentals and the divesture of our Mexico business as compared to the same quarter in 2018. Depreciation and amortization, net of (gains) losses on sale of property and equipment decreased $1.6 million, or 6.6%, compared to the same quarter in 2018. Over the balance of 2019, we currently plan to replace owned tractors with new owned tractors as they reach approximately 475,000 miles, and a portion of our leased tractors with owned equipment when their respective lease terminates. As a result of our 2019 replacement cycle, which is above normalized levels due to a large purchase of more fuel efficient tractors approximately four years ago, we expect the average age of our company tractor fleet will reduce from 28 months as of December 31, 2018 to approximately 18 months as we exit 2019. Our mix of owned and leased equipment may vary over time due to tax, financing and flexibility, among other factors.
Purchased Transportation
Purchased transportation consists of the payments we make to independent contractors, including fuel surcharge reimbursements paid to independent contractors, in partour Truckload segment, and payments to third‑party carriers in our Brokerage segment.
The following is a summary of our purchased transportation for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018:
  Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 
  2019  2018 
  (dollars in thousands) 
Purchased transportation $114,005  $101,776 
% of total operating revenue  27.4%  23.9%
% of revenue, before fuel surcharge  30.4%  26.6%
For the quarter ended March 31, 2019, purchased transportation increased equipment costs, an$12.2 million, or 12.0%, compared to the same quarter in 2018. The increase in owned tractors,purchased transportation was primarily due to a 45.9% increase in average independent contractors, a $2.5 million increase in fuel surcharge reimbursement to independent contractors, partially offset by an $8.3 million decrease in Brokerage revenue as compared to the same quarter in 2018.
Because we reimburse independent contractors for fuel surcharges we receive, we subtract fuel surcharge revenue reimbursed to them from our purchased transportation. The result, referred to as purchased transportation, net of fuel surcharge reimbursements, is evaluated as a percentage of total operating revenue and the amortization of communication equipment.  Asas a percentage of revenue, before fuel surcharge, depreciationas shown below:
  Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 
  2019  2018 
  (dollars in thousands) 
Purchased transportation $114,005  $101,776 
Less: fuel surcharge revenue reimbursed to independent contractors  10,480   7,956 
Purchased transportation, net of fuel surcharge reimbursement $103,525  $93,820 
         
% of total operating revenue  24.9%  22.0%
% of revenue, before fuel surcharge  27.6%  24.5%
For the quarter ended March 31, 2019, purchased transportation, net of fuel surcharge reimbursement, increased $9.7 million, or 10.3%, compared to the same quarter in 2018. This increase was primarily due to the 45.9% increase in average independent contractors, partially offset by the $8.3 million decrease in Brokerage revenue compared to the same quarter in 2018. This expense category will fluctuate with the number and amortizationpercentage of loads hauled by independent contractors and third‑party carriers, as well as the amount of fuel surcharge revenue passed through to independent contractors. If industry‑wide trucking capacity continues to tighten in relation to freight demand, we may need to increase the amounts we pay to third‑party carriers and independent contractors, which could increase this expense category on an absolute basis and as a percentage of total operating revenue and revenue, before fuel surcharge, absent an offsetting increase in revenue. Our recent success in growing our lease-purchase program and independent contractor drivers have contributed to increased purchased transportation expense. If we are successful in continuing these efforts, we would expect this line item to 5.7%increase as a percentage of total operating revenue and revenue, before fuel surcharge.
Operating Expenses and Supplies
Operating expenses and supplies consist primarily of ordinary vehicle repairs and maintenance costs, driver on‑the‑road expenses, tolls and advertising expenses related to driver recruiting. Operating expenses and supplies are primarily affected by the age of our company‑owned and leased fleet of tractors and trailers, the number of miles driven in a period and driver turnover.
The following is a summary of our operating expenses and supplies for the three months ended June 30, 2007, compared to 4.8% duringMarch 31, 2019 and 2018:
  Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 
  2019  2018 
  (dollars in thousands) 
Operating expenses and supplies $27,945  $29,791 
% of total operating revenue  6.7%  7.0%
% of revenue, before fuel surcharge  7.4%  7.8%
For the same period in 2006, primarily due to lower revenue per tractor per week less effectively covering these costs.
Purchased transportationquarter ended March 31, 2019, operating expenses and supplies decreased 1.5% to $60.4$1.8 million, during the three months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $61.3 million during the same period in 2006.  This decrease is primarily due to a decrease of approximately 22% in rail volumesor 6.2%, compared to the same periodquarter in 2006.  As2018. The decrease was primarily due to decreased tractor maintenance expense as a percentageresult of revenue, before fuel surcharge, purchased transportation decreasedincreased independent contractors and the divesture of our Mexico business, partially offset by increased driver hiring costs compared to 17.6%the same quarter in 2018. Independent contractors are responsible for the maintenance of their tractor and now account for 25.4% of the total average tractors compared to 17.5% in the 2007 period from 18.6% in the 2006 period.prior year quarter.

Insurance Premiums and Claims
16


Insurance premiums and claims, consisting consists primarily of premiums and deductibleretained amounts for liability (personal injury and property damage), physical damage and cargo damage, as well as insurance premiums. The primary factors affecting our insurance premiums and claims are the frequency and severity of accidents, trends in the development factors used in our actuarial accruals and developments in large, prior year claims. The number of accidents tends to increase with the miles we travel. With our significant retained amounts, insurance claims expense may fluctuate significantly and impact the cost of insurance premiums and claims from period‑to‑period, and any increase in frequency or severity of claims or adverse loss development of prior period claims would adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. We renewed our liability insurance policies on September 1, 2018 and reduced our deductible to $3.0 million per occurrence.
The following is a summary of our insurance premiums and claims expense for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018:
  Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 
  2019  2018 
  (dollars in thousands) 
Insurance premiums and claims $24,353  $20,170 
% of total operating revenue  5.9%  4.7%
% of revenue, before fuel surcharge  6.5%  5.3%
For the quarter ended March 31, 2019, insurance premiums and claims increased $4.2 million, or 20.7%, compared to the same quarter in 2018. Insurance premiums and claims increased primarily due to increased physical damage and liability claims primarily as a result of adverse weather in the first quarter of 2019 as compared to the same quarter in 2018. We do not expect our insurance and claims experience in the first quarter of 2019 to be ongoing. During the fourth quarter of 2017, we began installing event recorders on our tractors, and we had installed event recorders in substantially all of our tractors in our fleet as of the second quarter of 2018. We believe event recorders will give us the ability to better train our drivers with respect to safe driving behavior, which in turn may help reduce insurance costs over time. We expect to begin seeing measurable results from the event recorder installation in the second half of 2019.

Interest
Interest expense consists of cash interest, amortization of original issuance discount and deferred financing fees and purchase commitment interest related to our obligation to acquire the remaining equity interest in Xpress Internacional.
The following is a summary of our interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018:
  Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 
  2019  2018 
  (dollars in thousands) 
Interest expense, excluding non-cash items  5,444   11,835 
Original issue discount and deferred financing amortization  159   871 
Purchase commitment interest  -   (48)
Interest expense, net $5,603  $12,658 
For the quarter ended March 31, 2019, interest expense decreased 1.8%$7.1 million, primarily due to $16.0decreased equipment and revolver borrowings combined with lower interest rates related to our term loan compared to the same quarter in 2018. Based on the repayment of our prior credit arrangements in connection with the IPO, along with the entry into our existing Credit Facility, we expect our interest expense to approximate $22.0 million for 2019.

Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
Our business requires substantial amounts of cash to cover operating expenses as well as to fund capital expenditures, working capital changes, principal and interest payments on our obligations, lease payments, letters of credit to support insurance requirements and tax payments when we generate taxable income. Recently, we have financed our capital requirements with borrowings under our Credit Facility, cash flows from operating activities, direct equipment financing, operating leases and proceeds from equipment sales.
We believe we can fund our expected cash needs, including debt repayment, in the short‑term with projected cash flows from operating activities, borrowings under our Credit Facility and direct debt and lease financing we believe to be available for at least the next 12 months. Over the long‑term, we expect that we will continue to have significant capital requirements, which may require us to seek additional borrowings, lease financing or equity capital. We have obtained a significant portion of our revenue equipment under operating leases, which are not reflected as net capital expenditures. The availability of financing and equity capital will depend upon our financial condition and results of operations as well as prevailing market conditions.
At March 31, 2019, we had approximately $31.7 million of outstanding letters of credit, $0 in outstanding borrowings and $118.3 million of availability under our $150.0 million revolving credit facility.
Sources of Liquidity
Credit Facility
In June 2018, we entered into a new credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) that contains a $150.0 million revolving component (the “Revolving Facility”) and a $200.0 million term loan component (the “Term Facility”). The Credit Facility contains an accordion feature that, so long as no event of default exists, allows us to request an increase in the borrowing amounts under the Revolving Facility or the Term Facility by a combined maximum amount of $75.0 million. Borrowings under the Credit Facility are classified as either “base rate loans” or “Eurodollar rate loans.” Base rate loans accrue interest at a base rate equal to the agent’s prime rate plus an applicable margin that was set at 1.25% through September 30, 2018 and adjusted quarterly thereafter between 0.75% and 1.50% based on our consolidated net leverage ratio. Eurodollar rate loans will accrue interest at London Interbank Offered Rate, or a comparable or successor rate approved by the administrative agent, plus an applicable margin that was set at 2.25% through September 30, 2018 and adjusted quarterly thereafter between 1.75% and 2.50% based on our consolidated net leverage ratio. The Credit Facility requires payment of a commitment fee on the unused portion of the Revolving Facility commitment of between 0.25% and 0.35% based on our consolidated net leverage ratio. In addition, the Revolving Facility includes, within its $150.0 million revolving credit facility, a letter of credit sub facility in an aggregate amount of $75.0 million and a swingline sub facility in an aggregate amount of $15.0 million. The Term Facility has scheduled quarterly principal payments between 1.25% and 2.50% of the original face amount of the Term Facility plus any additional amount borrowed pursuant to the accordion feature of the Term Facility, with the first such payment occurring on the last day of our fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2018.  The Credit Facility will mature on June 18, 2023.
Borrowings under the Credit Facility are prepayable at any time without premium and are subject to mandatory prepayment from the net proceeds of certain asset sales and other borrowings. The Credit Facility is secured by a pledge of substantially all of our assets, excluding, among other things, certain real estate and revenue equipment financed outside the Credit Facility.
The Credit Facility contains restrictive covenants including, among other things, restrictions on our ability to incur additional indebtedness or issue guarantees, to create liens on our assets, to make distributions on or redeem equity interests, to make investments, to transfer or sell properties or other assets and to engage in mergers, consolidations, or acquisitions. In addition, the Credit Facility requires us to meet specified financial ratios and tests.
At March 31, 2019, the Revolving Facility had issued collateralized letters of credit in the face amount of $31.7 million, with $0 borrowings outstanding and $118.3 million available to borrow and the Term Facility had $192.5 million outstanding.
The Credit Facility includes usual and customary events of default for a facility of this nature and provides that, upon the occurrence and continuation of an event of default, payment of all amounts payable under the Credit Facility may be accelerated, and the Lenders’ commitments may be terminated. At March 31, 2019, the Company was in compliance with all financial covenants prescribed by the Credit Facility.

Cash Flows
Our summary statements of cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 are set forth in the table below:
  Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 
  2019  2018 
  (dollars in thousands) 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities $25,479  $(1,863)
Net cash used in investing actitivies $(32,491) $(18,695)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities $(12,569) $15,496 
Operating Activities
For the three months ended March 31, 2019, we generated cash flows from operating activities of $25.5 million, an increase of $27.3 million compared to the same period in 2018. The increase was due primarily to a $2.5 million increase in net income adjusted for noncash items, and a $24.9 million decrease in our operating assets and liabilities. The increase in net income adjusted for noncash items was primarily attributable to a 3.8% increase in revenue per loaded mile, improved operating performance at our Brokerage segment and lower interest expense in the three months ended March 31, 2019 as compared to the same period in 2018, partially offset by increased insurance premiums and claims expense. Our operating assets and liabilities decreased $24.9 million during the three months ended June 30, 2007March 31, 2019 as compared to $16.3 million during the same period in 2006.  This decrease is2018, due primarilyin part to a reduction in liability claims expense partially offset by an increase in physical damage claims.  As a percentageincreased accounts receivable collections, and decreased payments for accounts payable and other accrued liabilities related to timing of revenue, before fuel surcharge, insurance and claims decreased to 4.6% duringpayments.
Investing Activities

For the three months ended June 30, 2007,March 31, 2019, net cash flows used in investing activities were $32.5 million, an increase of $13.8 million compared to 4.9% during the same period in 2006. We are self-insured up to certain limits for cargo loss, physical damage, and liability. We have adopted an insurance program with higher deductible exposure to offset the industry-wide increase in insurance premium rates. Refer to "Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates—Claims Reserves and Estimates" below for our various retention levels.  We maintain insurance with licensed insurance companies above amounts for which we are self-insured for cargo and liability. We accrue for pending claims, plus any incurred but not reported claims. The accruals are estimated based on our evaluation of the type and severity of individual claims and future development based on historical trends. Insurance premiums and claims expense will fluctuate based on claims experience, premium rates, and self-insurance retention levels.
Operating taxes and licenses increased 4.7% to $4.5 million during the three months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $4.3 million during the same period in 2006.2018. This increase is primarily the result of increased number of company tractors. As a percentage of revenue, before fuel surcharge, operating taxes and licenses remained essentially constant at 1.3% for both periods.
Communications and utilities decreased 19.4% to $2.9 during the three months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $3.6 million during the same period in 2006. This decrease is primarily the result of replacing leased units with purchased units.  The associated expense with the purchased units is located in depreciation and amortization.  As a percentage of revenue, before fuel surcharge, communications and utilities decreased to 0.8% in the 2007 period from 1.1% in the 2006 period.
General and other operating decreased 3.5% to $10.9 million during the three months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $11.3 million during the same period in 2006. This decrease is attributed to a small reduction in several areas. As a percentage of revenue, before fuel surcharge, general and other operating decreased slightly to 3.2% in the 2007 period from 3.4% in the 2006 period.
Interest expense increased 17.0% to $5.5 million during the three months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $4.7 million during the same period in 2006.  This increase is a result of higher interest rates and increased debt.
Minority interest of $61 for the three months ended June 30, 2007 is representative of the 20% minority shareholders interest in the net income of Arnold and Total.
The effective tax rate was 47.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2007.  The rate was higher than the federal statutory rate of 35%, primarilyequipment purchases as a result of per diems paid to drivers at U.S. Xpress and Total which are not fully deductible for federal income tax purposes.

Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2006
Total operating revenue increased 10.4% to $761.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $689.2 million during the same period in 2006. The increase resulted primarily from the inclusion of $180.6 million in revenue from Arnold and Total for six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $124.2 million for the four months ended June 30, 2006 and an approximate 550 truck increase in the average number of seated trucks in the U.S. Xpress fleet partially offset by a 5.3% reduction in revenue per tractor and decreased rail volumes for the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006.2018, combined with the cash disposed in conjunction with the sale of our Mexico subsidiary. We expect our net capital expenditures for calendar year 2019 will approximate $170.0 million to $190.0 million to execute our equipment replacement strategy and will be financed with cash from operations, borrowings on our line of credit and secured debt financing.

17Financing Activities



Revenue, before fuel surcharge, increased 11.2% to $660.8 million duringFor the sixthree months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $594.4March 31, 2019, net cash flows used in financing activities were $12.6 million, during the same period in 2006. Truckload revenue, before fuel surcharge, increased 11.9% to $614.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2007, compared to $549.2 million during the same period in 2006, due primarily to the addition of six months of Arnold and Total revenues in the amount of $157.4 million in the second quarter of 2007 compared to four months in the amount of $107.4 million in the second quarter of 2006. U.S. Xpress revenues increased 3.5% to $457.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $441.8 million during the same period in 2006 as a result of an increase in average trucks by approximately 550 partially offset by a 5.3% reduction in revenue per tractor and a decrease in rail volume compared to the second quarter of 2006.  Xpress Global Systems’ revenue increased 0.8% to $48.4$28.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2007, compared to $48.0 million during the same period in 2006.  Intersegment revenue decreased to $2.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2007, compared to $2.8 million during the same period in 2006.
Salaries, wages, and benefits increased 13.3% to $260.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $230.0 million during the same period in 2006. This increase is due in part to the addition of six months of Arnold and Total salaries, wages and benefits in the amount of $55.8 million compared to four months in the amount of $37.1 million and a 5.4% increase in U.S. Xpress company driver miles offset by an approximate 4.7% decrease in U.S. Xpress office employees. As a percentage of revenue, before fuel surcharge, salaries, wages, and benefits increased to 39.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2007, compared to 38.7% during the same period in 2006.
Fuel and fuel taxes, net of fuel surcharge, increased 19.4% to $72.6 million during the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $60.8 million during the same period in 2006. The increase is due primarily to the addition of Arnold and Total fuel and fuel taxes in the amount of $18.2 million for six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $11.0 million for the four months ended June 30, 2006, a 5.4% increase in U.S. Xpress company miles, and decreased expedited rail volumes during the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006. Fuel surcharges paid2018. The increase is primarily due to the railroad are reflected in purchased transportation. As a percentagedecreased revenue equipment borrowings and net borrowings under our revolving line of revenue before fuel surcharge, fuel and fuel taxesincreased slightly to 11.0% during the six months ended June 30, 2007credit as compared to 10.2% during the same period in 2006.2018.

Vehicle rents increased 26.3% to $47.6
Working Capital

As of March 31, 2019, we had a working capital deficit of $41.6 million, during the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $37.7representing an $8.0 million during the same period in 2006.  This increase is due primarily to the addition of vehicle rents for Arnold and Total in the amount of $10.6 million for six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $4.6 million for four months ended June 30, 2006 and an increase in the average number of tractors financed under operating leases to 4,130 compared to 3,247 during the same period in 2006.  As a percentage of revenue, before fuel surcharge, vehicle rents increased to 7.2% during the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to 6.4% during the same period in 2006.
Depreciation and amortization increased 40.8% to $39.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $27.7 million during the same period in 2006.  Gains/losses realized on the sale of revenue equipment are included in depreciation and amortization for reporting purposes.  Depreciation and amortization, excluding gains/losses, increased to $38.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $29.4 million during the same period in 2006. This increase is due in part to increased equipment costs, an increase in owned tractors, and the amortization of communication equipment.  As a percentage of revenue, before fuel surcharge, depreciation and amortization increased to 5.9% during the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to 4.7% during the same period in 2006,our working capital from March 31, 2018, primarily due to lower revenue per tractor per week less effectively covering these costs, an increase in the percentage of our fleet consisting of purchased equipment, and higher prices of new equipment.
Purchased transportation increased 6.7% to $115.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $107.8 million during the same period in 2006 primarily due to the increase of purchased transportation amounts for Arnold and Total in the amount of $11.3 million for six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to four months ended June 30, 2006. This increase is partially offset byresulting from decreased expenditures to the railroads due to a reduction in rail volumes. As a percentage of revenue, before fuel surcharge, purchased transportation decreased to 17.4% during the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to 18.2% during the same period in 2006.
Operating expense and supplies increased 8.1% to $48.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $44.6 million during the same period in 2006.  This is primarily the result of the increase of operating expense and supplies amounts for Arnold and Total in the amount of $3.5 million for six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to four months ended June 30, 2006. As a percentage of revenue, before fuel surcharge, operating expense and supplies decreased slightly to 7.3% during the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to 7.4% during the same period in 2006.
Insurance premiums and claims, consisting primarily of premiums and deductible amounts for liability (personal injury and property damage), physical damage, and cargo damage insurance and claims, increased 4.4% to $30.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $29.6 million during the same period in 2006. The increase is due primarily to the increase of insurance premium and claims expenses for Arnold and Total in the amount of $1.6 million for six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to four months ended June 30, 2006.  Excluding Arnold and Total amounts, insurance premiums and claims decreased 0.8% to $23.8 million compared to $24.0 million during the same period in 2006.  This decrease is due primarily to a reduction in liability claims expense partially offset by an increase in physical damage claims. As a percentage of revenue, before fuel surcharge, insurance and claims decreased to 4.7% during the six months ended June 30, 2007, compared to 5.0% during the same period in 2006. We are self-insured up to certain limits for cargo loss, physical damage, and liability. We have adopted an insurance program with higher deductible exposure to offset the industry-wide increase in insurance premium rates. Refer to "Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates—Claims Reserves and Estimates" below for our various retention levels.  We maintain insurance with licensed insurance companies above amounts for which we are self-insured for cargo and liability. We accrue for pending claims, plus any incurred but not reported claims. The accruals are estimated based on our evaluation of the type and severity of individual claims and future development based on historical trends. Insurance premiums and claims expense will fluctuate based on claims experience, premium rates, and self-insurance retention levels.
Operating taxes and licenses increased 10.0% to $8.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $8.0 million during the same period in 2006.  This is primarily the result of the increase for Arnold and Total in the amount of $0.9 million for six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to four months ended June 30, 2006.  As a percentage of revenue, operating taxes and license remained essentially constant at 1.3% for both periods.
Communications and utilities decreased 10.8% to $5.8 during the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $6.5 million during the same period in 2006. This decrease is primarily the result of replacing leased units with purchased units.  The associated expense with the purchased units is located in depreciation and amortization. This decrease is partially offset by the increase of communications and utilities amounts for Arnold and Total in the amount of $0.6 million for six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to four months ended June 30, 2006. As a percentage of revenue, before fuel surcharge, communications and utilities decreased to 0.9% during the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to 1.1% during the same period in 2006.
General and other operating increased 0.9% to $21.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $21.2 million during the same period in 2006.  This is primarily the result of the increase of general and other operating amounts for Arnold and Total in the amount of $0.9 million for six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to four months ended June 30, 2006 partially offset by small reductions in several areas. As a percentage of revenue, before fuel surcharge, general and other operating decreased to 3.2% during the six months ended June 30, 2007, compared to 3.5% during the same period in 2006.
Interest expense increased 41.0% to $11.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $7.8 million during the same period in 2006. The increase is due primarily to the increase of interest expense for Arnold and Total in the amount of $2.2 million for six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to four months ended June 30, 2006, increased debt, and higher interest rates.
Minority interest of $10 for the six months ended June 30, 2007 is representative of the 20% minority shareholders interest in the net loss of Arnold and Total.
The effective tax rate was 50.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The rate was higher than the federal statutory rate of 35%, primarily as a result of per diems paid to drivers at U.S. Xpress and Total which are not fully deductible for federal income tax purposes.

Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our business is expected to require significant capital investments over the short-term and long-term. Our primary sources of liquidity at June 30, 2007 were funds provided by operations, borrowing under our revolving credit facility, proceeds of our accounts receivable securitization facility, and long-term equipment debt and operating leases of revenue equipment. Our revolving credit facility has maximum available borrowings of $130.0 million and our accounts receivable securitization facility has maximum available borrowings, subject to eligible receivables, of $140.0 million. We believe that funds provided by operations, borrowings under our revolving credit facility and securitization facility, equipment installment loans and long-term equipment debt, and operating lease financing will be sufficient to fund our cash needs and anticipated capital expenditures for the next twelve months. Although changes in economic conditions, credit and leasing markets, and our financial condition and results of operations, over time may cause fluctuations in the terms and conditions and amounts of available financing, we believe that these same sources of liquidity will be available to us over a longer-term and we, therefore, do not expect to experience significant liquidity constraints in the foreseeable future.
Cash Flows
Net cash provided by operating activities was $63.5 million and $55.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities is primarily due to increased depreciationaccrued liabilities and accounts payable, partially offset by decreased earnings and an increase of accounts receivable for the six months ended June 30, 2007,customer receivables. Our current liabilities increased by $56.9 million as compared to the same period in 2006.
Net cash used in investing activities was $40.4 million and $74.6 million during the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 respectively. The decrease in cash used in investing activities is primarily thea result of $33.8the adoption of the new lease standard. When we analyze our working capital, we typically exclude balloon payments in the current maturities of long-term debt as these payments are typically either funded with the proceeds from equipment sales or addressed by extending the maturity of such payments. We believe this facilitates a more meaningful analysis of our changes in working capital from period-to-period. Excluding balloon payments included in current maturities of long-term debt and the current portion of our operating lease liability as of March 31, 2019, we had a working capital surplus of $60.3 million, lesscompared with a working capital deficit of $2.3 million at March 31, 2018. Excluding only the balloon payments included in current maturities of debt, we had a working capital surplus of $3.4 million at March 31, 2019.

Working capital deficits are common to many trucking companies that operate by financing revenue equipment purchases due to the winding down of a large tractor purchase commitment in 2006 ahead of new engine requirements in 2007.
Net cash used in financing activities was $23.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2007, compared to $13.2 million provided by financing activities during the same period in 2006.  The decrease in cash provided by financing activities is the result of net reduction of debt during the period due to fewer purchases ofthrough borrowing, or lease arrangements. When we finance revenue equipment through borrowing or lease arrangements, the principal amortization or, in the case of operating leases, the present value of the lease payments scheduled for the sixnext twelve months, ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the same period in 2006.
Debt
The Company is party to a $130,000 senior secured revolving credit facility and letter of credit sub-facility with a group of banks with a maturity date in March 2011.  The credit facility is secured by revenue equipment and certain other assets and bears interest at the base rate, as defined, plus an applicable margin of 0.00% to 0.25%, or LIBOR plus an applicable margin of 0.88% to 2.00%, based on the Company's lease-adjusted leverage ratio.
At June 30, 2007, the applicable margin was 0.25% for base rate loans and 2.00% for LIBOR loans. The credit facility also prescribes additional fees for letter of credit transactions and a quarterly commitment fee on the unused portion of the loan commitment (2.00% and 0.35%, respectively, at June 30, 2007).  At June 30, 2007, $91,036 in letters of credit was outstanding under the credit facility with $34,601 available to borrow. The credit facility is secured by substantially all assets of the Company, other than real estate and assets securing other debt of the Company.
The credit facility requires, among other things, maintenance by the Company of prescribed minimum amounts of consolidated tangible net worth, fixed charge and asset coverage ratios, and a leverage ratio. Subject to certain defined exceptions, the credit facility also restricts the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries, without the approval of the lenders, to engage in sale-leaseback transactions, transactions with affiliates, investment transactions, acquisitions of the Company’s own capital stock or the payment of dividends on such stock, future asset dispositions (except in the ordinary course of business), or other business combination transactions, and to incur liens and future indebtedness. As of June 30, 2007, the Company was in compliance with the credit facility covenants.

The Company is party to a $140,000 accounts receivable securitization facility (the "Securitization Facility").  On a revolving basis, the Company sells accounts receivable as part of a two-step securitization transaction that provides the Company with funding similar to a revolving credit facility.  To facilitate this transaction, Xpress Receivables, LLC ("Xpress Receivables"), a bankruptcy-remote, special purpose entity, purchases accounts receivable from U.S. Xpress, Arnold, Total, and Xpress Global Systems.  Xpress Receivables funds these purchases with money borrowed under the Securitization Facility through Three Pillars Funding, LLC.
The borrowings are secured by, and paid down through collections on, the accounts receivable. The Company can borrow up to $140,000 under the Securitization Facility, subject to eligible receivables, and pays interest on borrowings based on commercial paper interest rates, plus an applicable margin, and a commitment fee on the daily, unused portion of the Securitization Facility. The Securitization Facility is reflectedcategorized as a current liability, inalthough the consolidated financial statements because its term, subject to annual renewals, expires October 11, 2007. As of June 30, 2007, the Company’s borrowings under the Securitization Facility were $20,000, with $116,961 available to borrow.
The Securitization Facility requires that certain performance ratios be maintained with respect to accounts receivable and that Xpress Receivables preserve its bankruptcy-remote nature. As of June 30, 2007, the Company was in compliance with the Securitization Facility covenants.
At June 30, 2007, we had $337.6 million of borrowings, of which $258.6 million was long-term, $59.0 million was current maturities, and $20.0 million consisted of borrowings under the Securitization Facility. We also had approximately $91.0 million in unused letters of credit. At June 30, 2007, we had an aggregate of approximately $151.6 million of available borrowing remaining under our revolving credit facility and the Securitization Facility.
Equity
In January 2007, the Board of Directors authorized us to repurchase up to $15.0 million of our Class A common stock.  The stock could be repurchased on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions at any time until January 26, 2008.  The repurchased shares may be used for issuances under our incentive stock plan or for other general corporate purposes, as the Board may determine.  No shares were repurchased during the second quarter of 2007.
On June 22, 2007, Max Fuller and Pat Quinn, co-founders of the Company (“Co-Founders”), announced their intention to commence a tender offer through an entity controlled by the Co-Founders, pursuant to which the Co-Founders will offer to purchase for cash any and all of the outstanding shares of Class A common stock of the Company not presently owned by the Co-Founders and certain affiliated entities at an offer price of $20.00 per share.  
The tender offer price represents a premium of 44% over the $13.88 per share average reported closing price of the Company’s Class A common stock for the 30 trading days ended on June 21, 2007, the last trading day before the announcement of the tender offer, and a 41% premium over the $14.23 per share reported closing price on June 21, 2007.  The announcement stated that the tender offer is expected to be conditioned on, among other things, there having been validly tendered and not withdrawn prior to the expiration date of the tender offer at least that number of shares of the Company’s common stock currently owned by the Co-Founders and certain affiliated entities, represent at least 90% of all the Company’s Class A and Class B common stock then outstanding, and (2) that represent at least a majority of the total number of shares of the Company’s Class A and Class B common stock outstanding on such date that are not held by Co-Founders, their affiliates, or the directors and executive officers of the Company.  The announcement further stated that, promptly following the completion of the tender offer, the Co-Founders expect to cause a "short form" merger in which they would acquire at $20.00 per share any Class A common stock of the Company that was not acquired in the tender offer.
The Co-Founders have advised our board of directors that they and certain of their affiliated entities do not intend to tender their shares in the offer, nor would they consider any offer to purchase their shares.  Currently, the Co-Founders and their affiliated entities together beneficially own approximately 28% of the outstanding Class A common stock of the Company, as well as 100% of the Company’s outstanding Class B common stock, for an aggregate of approximately 42% of the outstanding Class A and Class B common shares.  The Class A common stock is entitled to one vote per share and the Class B common stock is entitled to two votes per share.  Accordingly, the shares owned by the Co-Founders and their affiliated entities represent over 50% of the voting power of all of the Company’s outstanding common stock.  Co-Founders founded the Company in 1985 and serve as Co-Chairmen of the Board.  Mr. Fuller is the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Quinn is the Company’s President.
In response to this June 22, 2007 announcement, our board of directors appointed a special committee comprised solely of independent directors to evaluate the offer.  The special committee has engaged an independent legal adviser and an independent financial adviser to assist the special committee in its review.  The Co-Founders also informed us that parties have been proceeding diligently with the preparation of offer materials, definitive financing arrangements, and regulatory filings.


Business Acquisitions
In January of 2007, the Company acquired certain assets of a truckload carrier for a purchase price of $5.6 million in cash. The assets acquired of approximately $4.8 million related primarily to revenue equipment and operating lease right of use assets are classified as long-term assets. Consequently, each acquisition of revenue equipment financed with borrowing, or lease arrangements decreases working capital. We believe a working capital deficit has little impact on our liquidity. Based on our expected financial condition, net capital expenditures, results of operations, related net cash flows, installment notes, and other assets. The excesssources of financing, we believe our working capital and sources of liquidity will be adequate to meet our current and projected needs and we do not expect to experience material liquidity constraints in the purchase price over the fair value of the assets acquired was recorded as goodwill. The purchase price allocation is preliminary as the Company is still reviewing the valuations of certain assets.foreseeable future.

In June 2007, the Company indirectly acquired a 40% interest in C&C Trucking of Duncan (“C&C Trucking”) for $739.  Under the agreement, the Company can acquire the remaining 60% interest from 2008 to 2012.  We have accounted for C&C Trucking operating results using the equity method of accounting.
Off-Balance SheetOperating Lease Arrangements
We use non-cancelableleased approximately 2,100 tractors and 7,900 trailers under operating leases as aat March 31, 2019. Operating leases have been an important source of financing for our revenue and service equipment, office and terminal facilities, automobiles, and airplanes. In making the decision to finance through long-term debt or by entering into non-cancelable lease agreements, we consider interest rates, capital requirements, and the tax advantages of leasing versus owning. At June 30, 2007, a substantial portion of our off-balance sheet arrangements related to non-cancelable leases for revenue equipment and office and terminal facilities with termination dates ranging from July 2007 to March 2014.equipment. Lease payments on office and terminal facilities, automobiles, and airplanes are included in general and other operating expenses, lease payments on servicerespect of such equipment are includedreflected in operating expense and supplies, and lease payments on revenue equipment are included in vehicle rents in theour unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations, respectively. Rental expense related to our off-balance sheet arrangements was $26.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The remaining lease obligations as of June 30, 2007 were $284.5 million, with $96.9 million duecomprehensive income in the next twelve months.
line item “Vehicle rents.” Our revenue equipment rental expense including short term rentals was $19.0 million in the first quarter of 2019, compared with $20.0 million in the first quarter of 2018. The lease terms generally represent the estimated usage period of the equipment, which is generally substantially less than the economic lives. Certain revenue equipment leases provide for guarantees by us of a portion of the specified residual amount under certain circumstancesvalue at the end of the lease term. The maximum potential amount of future payments (undiscounted) under these guarantees is approximately $30.9$27.6 million at June 30, 2007.as of March 31, 2019. The residual value of a portion of the related leased revenuetractor equipment is covered by repurchase or trade agreements in principle between theus and equipment manufacturer and us. Management estimatesmanufacturers. We expect the fair market value of the guaranteedequipment at the end of the lease term will be approximately equal to the residual values for leased revenue equipment to be immaterial. Accordingly, we have no guaranteed liabilities accrued in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.value.
 
Critical Accounting Policies and EstimatesPage 34
In the ordinary course of business, we have made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of results of operations and financial position in the preparation of our financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates under different assumptions and conditions. We believe that the following discussion addresses our most critical accounting policies, which are those that are most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and require management’s most difficult, subjective and complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.
Recognition of Revenue
We generally recognize revenue and direct costs when shipments are completed. Certain revenue of Xpress Global Systems, representing approximately 6% of consolidated revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2007, is recognized upon manifest, that is, the time when the trailer of the independent carrier is loaded, sealed, and ready to leave the dock. Estimated expenses are recorded simultaneously with the recognition of revenue. Had revenue been recognized using another method, such as completed shipment, the impact would have been insignificant to our consolidated financial statements.


Income Taxes
Significant management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes and in determining whether deferred tax assets will be realized in full or in part. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates that are expected to apply to taxable income in years in which the temporary differences are expected to be reversed. When it is more likely than not that all or some portion of specific deferred tax assets, such as state tax credit carry-forwards or state net operating loss carry-forwards, will not be realized, a valuation allowance must be established for the amount of the deferred tax assets that are determined to be not realizable. A valuation allowance for deferred tax assets of $178 has been deemed necessary at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006. If the facts or financial results were to change, impacting the likelihood of the realization of the deferred tax assets, we would use our judgment to determine the amount of the valuation allowance required at that time for that period.
The determination of the combined tax rate used to calculate our provision for income taxes for both current and deferred income taxes also requires significant judgment by management. SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, requires that the net deferred tax asset or liability be valued using enacted tax rates that we believe will be in effect when these temporary differences reverse. We use the combined tax rates in effect at the time the financial statements are prepared since no better information is available. If changes in the federal statutory rate or significant changes in the statutory state and local tax rates occur prior to or during the reversal of these items or if our filing obligations were to change materially, this could change the combined rate and, by extension, our provision for income taxes.
Depreciation
Property and equipment are carried at cost. Depreciation of property and equipment is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets (net of estimated salvage value or trade-in value). We generally use estimated useful lives of 4-5 years and 7-10 years for tractors and trailers, respectively, with estimated salvage values ranging from 25% - 50% of the capitalized cost. The depreciable lives of our revenue equipment represent the estimated usage period of the equipment, which is generally substantially less than the economic lives. The residual value of a portion our equipment is covered by re-purchase or trade agreements between us and the equipment manufacturer.
Periodically, we evaluate the useful lives and salvage values of our revenue equipment and other long-lived assets based upon, but not limited to, our experience with similar assets, including gains or losses upon dispositions of such assets, conditions in the used equipment market, and prevailing industry practices. Changes in useful lives or salvage value estimates, or fluctuations in market values that are not reflected in our estimates, could have a material impact on financial results. Further, if our equipment manufacturer does not perform under the terms of the agreements for guaranteed trade-in values, such non-performance could have a materially negative impact on financial results.
Goodwill
The excess of the consideration paid over the estimated fair value of identifiable net assets acquired has been recorded as goodwill.
Effective January 1, 2002, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, ("SFAS 142"). As required by the provisions of SFAS 142, we test goodwill for impairment using a two-step process, based on the reporting unit fair value. The first step is a screen for potential impairment, while the second step measures impairment, if any. We completed the required impairment tests of goodwill and noted no impairment of goodwill in any years.
Goodwill impairment tests are highly subjective. Such tests include estimating the fair value of our reporting units. As required by SFAS 142, we compared the estimated fair value of the reporting units with their respective carrying amounts including goodwill. We define a reporting unit as an operating segment. Under SFAS 142, fair value refers to the amount for which the entire reporting unit could be bought or sold. Our methods for estimating reporting unit values include asset and liability fair values and other valuation techniques, such as discounted cash flows and multiples of earnings, or other financial measures. Each of these methods involve significant estimates and assumptions, including estimates of future financial performance and the selection of appropriate discount rates and valuation multiples.

22

Claims Reserves and Estimates
Claims reserves consist of estimates of cargo loss, physical damage, liability (personal injury and property damage), employee medical expenses, and workers’ compensation claims within our established retention levels. Claims in excess of retention levels are generally covered by insurance in amounts we consider adequate. Claims accruals represent pending claims including estimates of adverse development of known claims, plus an estimated liability for incurred but not reported claims. Accruals for cargo loss, physical damage, liability, and workers’ compensation claims are estimated based on our evaluation of the type and severity of individual claims and historical information, primarily our own claims experience, along with assumptions about future events combined with the assistance of independent actuaries in the case of workers’ compensation and liability. Changes in assumptions as well as changes in actual experience could cause these estimates to change in the near future.
Workers’ compensation and liability claims are particularly subject to a significant degree of uncertainty due to the potential for growth and development of the claims over time. Claims and insurance reserves related to workers’ compensation and liability are estimated by an independent third-party actuary, and we refer to these estimates in establishing the reserve. Liability reserves are estimated based on historical experience and trends, the type and severity of individual claims, and assumptions about future costs. Further, in establishing the workers’ compensation and liability reserves, we must take into account and estimate various factors, including, but not limited to, assumptions concerning the nature and severity of the claim, the effect of the jurisdiction on any award or settlement, the length of time until ultimate resolution, inflation rates in health care and in general, interest rates, legal expenses, and other factors. Our actual experience may be different than our estimates, sometimes significantly. Additionally, changes in assumptions made in actuarial studies could potentially have a material effect on the provision for workers’ compensation and liability claims.
Our insurance and claims expense varies based on the frequency and severity of claims, the premium expense, and the level of self-insured retention.   Prior to September 1, 2006, the retention levels for liability insurance at U.S. Xpress, Arnold and Total were $2.0 million, $1.0 million and $2.0 million, respectively.  Prior to September 1, 2006, the retention levels for workers’ compensation at U.S. Xpress, Arnold, and Total were $0.5 million, $0.8 million and $0.5 million, respectively.  Beginning September 1, 2006, the retention levels for liability and workers’ compensation for all companies is $3.0 million and $1.0 million respectively.
Accounting for Business Combinations
Our consolidated financial statements are inclusive of our accounts and the accounts of majority-owned subsidiaries.  We consolidate all of majority-owned subsidiaries and record a minority interest representing the remaining shares held by the minority shareholders.  All transactions and balances with and related to our majority owned subsidiaries have been eliminated.
In accordance with business combination accounting, we allocate the purchase price of acquired companies to the tangible and intangible assets acquired, and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values.  We engaged a third-party appraisal firm to assist management in determining the fair values of certain assets acquired. Such a valuation requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions, especially with respect to intangible assets.
Management makes estimates of fair value based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable. These estimates are based on historical experience and information obtained from the management of the acquired companies and are inherently uncertain.  Unanticipated events and circumstances may occur which may affect the accuracy or validity of such assumptions, estimates, or actual results.
For business combinations, we must record deferred taxes relating to the book versus tax basis of acquired assets and liabilities. Generally, such business combinations result in deferred tax liabilities as the book values are reflected at fair values where as the tax basis is carried over from the acquired company.  Such deferred taxes are initially estimated based on preliminary information and are subject to change as valuations and tax returns are finalized.


Seasonality
In the trucking industry, results of operations generally show a seasonal patternrevenue has historically decreased as customers increase shipments prior to and reduce shipments during and afterfollowing the winter holiday season. Additionally, shipments can be adversely impacted by winterseason and as inclement weather conditions. Ourimpedes operations. At the same time, operating expenses have historically been higher in the winter months due primarily to decreasedgenerally increased, with fuel efficiency increased maintenance costsdeclining because of revenueengine idling and weather, causing more physical damage equipment repairs and insurance claims and costs. For the reasons stated, first quarter results historically have been lower than results in colder weathereach of the other three quarters of the year. Over the past several years, we have seen increases in demand at varying times, including surges between Thanksgiving and increased insurancethe year‑end holiday season.
Contractual Obligations
During the three months ended March 31, 2019, there were no material changes in our commitments or contractual obligations.
Critical Accounting Policies
We have reviewed our critical accounting policies and claims costs dueconsidered whether any new critical accounting estimates or other significant changes to adverse winter weather conditions. Revenue can also be affected by bad weather and holidays,our accounting policies require any additional disclosures. We adopted ASC 842, Leases, on January 1, 2019.  See Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to our condensed consolidated financial statements included under Part 1, Item 1 of this report.  There have been no other significant changes to our accounting policies since revenue is directly related to available working days of shippers.
the disclosures made in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Interest Rate RiskITEM 3.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Our market risk is affected by changes in interest rates. Historically, werisks have used a combination of fixed rate and variable rate obligations to manage our interest rate exposure. Fixed interest rate obligations expose us to the risk that interest rates might fall. Variable interest rate obligations expose us to the risk that interest rates might rise.
We are exposed to variable interest rate risk principallynot changed materially from the Securitization Facilitymarket risks reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.

ITEM 4.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and our revolving credit facility. We are exposed to fixed interest rate risk principally from equipment notes and mortgages. At June 30, 2007, we had borrowings totaling $337.6 million, comprising $31.6 million of variable rate borrowings and $306.0 million of fixed rate borrowings. Holding other variables constant (such as borrowing levels)Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), the earnings impact of a one-percentage point increase/decrease in interest rates would not have a material impact on our consolidated statements of operations.
Commodity Price Risk
Fuel is one of our largest expenditures. The price and availability of diesel fuel fluctuates due to changes in production, seasonality, and other market factors generally outside our control. Many of our customer contracts contain fuel surcharge provisions to mitigate increases in the cost of fuel. Fuel surcharges to customers do not fully recover all of fuel increases due to engine idle time and out-of-route and empty miles not billable to the customer.
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act, we have carried out an evaluation ofhas evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report.March 31, 2019. This evaluation was carried outis performed to determine if our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the supervision,Exchange Act is accumulated and with the participation of, ourcommunicated to management, including our Chief Executive OfficerCEO and Chief Financial Officer. Based uponCFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and are effective to provide reasonable assurance that such information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC’s rules and forms. Due to the material weaknesses described below and the Company’s evaluation, our Chief Executive Officerthe CEO and Chief Financial OfficerCFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of March 31, 2019.

Material Weaknesses in Internal Control over Financial Reporting as of December 31, 2018

As described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the endyear ended December 31, 2018, during the course of preparing for our IPO, we identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, some of which continue to exist as of March 31, 2019. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of a company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. We did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting related to the control activities component of Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the period coveredTreadway Commission, the COSO framework. The control activities material weakness contributed to the following additional material weaknesses: (i) ineffective design of information technology general computer controls with respect to program development, change management, computer operations, and user access; (ii) ineffective design of controls over income tax accounting; and (iii) insufficient evidential matter to support design of our controls. These deficiencies did not result in a material misstatement to our annual or interim consolidated financial statements. However, there is a risk that these deficiencies could result in misstatements potentially impacting all financial statement accounts and disclosures that would not be prevented or detected.

Remediation of a Component of a Previously Disclosed Material Weakness

The material weakness related to the ineffective design of information technology general controls with respect to program management, change management computer operations and user access also included a component related to inappropriate segregation of duties with respect to creating and posting journal entries. We have remediated the component of the material weakness related to segregation of duties over creating and posting journal entries by this report. Theredesigning, implementing, and testing controls to ensure that journal entries posted into the general ledger are reviewed by a separate individual, thus resulting in proper segregation of duties.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We are currently in the process of remediating the above material weaknesses and have taken numerous steps to enhance our internal control environment and address the underlying causes of the material weaknesses. These efforts include designing and implementing the appropriate information technology general controls and controls over income tax accounting. In addition, we are enhancing our process to retain evidential matter that supports the design and implementation of our controls. We are committed to maintaining a strong internal control environment, and we expect to continue our efforts to ensure the material weaknesses described above are remediated. While we intend to complete our remediation process as quickly as possible, we cannot estimate a time when the remediation will be complete. Other than the implementation of these additional controls and new controls related to our adoption of ASC 842, Leases,  there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this reportquarter ended March 31, 2019 that have materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
 
DisclosureLimitations on Controls

Our disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures thatinternal control over financial reporting are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted underprovide reasonable assurance of achieving the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated todesired control objectives. Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding disclosures.
We have confidence in our internal controlsCEO and procedures. Nevertheless, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expectCFO, recognize that our disclosure procedures and controls or our internal controls will prevent all errors or intentional fraud. An internalany control system, no matter how well-conceivedwell designed and operated, canis based upon certain judgments and assumptions and cannot provide only reasonable, not absolute assurance that theits objectives of such internal controls arewill be met. Further, the design ofSimilarly, an internal control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all internal control systems, no evaluation of controls cancannot provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our Company have been detected.

PART II          OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are involved in various other litigation and claims primarily arising in the normal course of business, which include claims for personal injury or property damage incurred in the transportation of freight. Our insurance program for liability, physical damage and cargo damage involves varying risk retention levels. Claims in excess of these risk retention levels are covered by insurance in amounts that management considers to be adequate. Based on its knowledge of the facts and, in certain cases, advice of outside counsel, management believes the resolution of claims and pending litigation, taking into account existing reserves, will not have a materially adverse effect on us. Information relating to legal proceedings is included in Note 7 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, and is incorporated herein by reference.
24Page 36

U.S. XPRESS ENTERPRISES, INC.ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Risk Factors
While we attempt to identify, manage, and mitigate risks and uncertainties associated with our business, some level of risk and uncertainty will always be present. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (“2006 Form 10-K”),2018, in the section entitled Item"Item 1A. Risk Factors,,”" describes some of the risks and uncertainties associated with our business. These risks and uncertainties have the potential to materially affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, projected results, and future prospects.  In addition to the risk factors set forth on our Form 10-K, we believe that the following additional issues, uncertainties, and risks, should be considered in evaluating our business and growth outlook:
 
We operate in a highly regulated industry and changes in regulations could have a materially adverse effect on our business.ITEM 2.UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Our operations are regulated and licensed by various government agencies, including the Department of Transportation ("DOT").  The DOT, through the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, or FMCSA, imposes safety and fitness regulations on us and our drivers. New rules that limit driver hours-of-service were adopted effective January 4, 2004, and then modified effective October 1, 2005 (the "2005 Rules").  On July 24, 2007, a federal appeals court vacated portions of the 2005 Rules.  Two of the key portions that were vacated include the expansion of the driving day from 10 hours to 11 hours, and the "34 hour restart" requirement that drivers must have a break of at least 34 consecutive hours during each week.  The court's decision does not go into effect until September 14, 2007, unless the court orders otherwise, and the FMCSA has until such date to request a hearing on the matter.  We understand that the FMCSA is currently analyzing the court's decision, and we are unable to predict whether the order will be appealed or the outcome of any such appeal.
If the court's decision becomes effective, it may have varying effects, in that reducing driving time to 10 hours daily may reduce productivity in some lanes, while eliminating the 34-hour restart may enhance productivity in certain instances.  On the whole, however, we would expect the court's decision to reduce productivity and cause some loss of efficiency as our drivers are retrained and some shipping lanes may need to be reconfigured.  Additionally, we are unable to predict the effect of any new rules that might be proposed, but any such proposed rules could increase costs in our industry or decrease productivity.
The number of shares repurchased and the effects of repurchasing the shares may have an adverse effect on debt, equity, and liquidity of the Company.
Our board of directors has authorized various stock repurchase plans over the years.  In January 2007, our board of directors authorized the Company to repurchase up to $15.0 million of Class A Shares on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions at any time until January 26, 2008, unless further extended by our Board (the "Plan").  During the first quarter ended March 31, 2007, the Company purchased 200,000 Class A Shares at an average price per share of $18.59. While the Company2018, we did not repurchaseengage in unregistered sales of securities or any shares during the second quarter ended June 30, 2007, $11,282,399 worthother transactions required to be reported under this Item 2 of shares may yet be purchasedPart II on Form 10-Q.

The payment of cash dividends is currently limited by our financing arrangements, including certain covenants under the Plan.  As any future repurchases would likely be funded from cash flow from operations and/or possible borrowings under the Company’s credit arrangement, such repurchasing of shares could reduce the amount of cash on hand or increase debt, and reduce the Company’s liquidity.Credit Facility.


ITEM 3.DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not applicable.

ITEM 4.The current trading price for our Class A common stock is above the trading price prior to the Mountain Lake Acquisition Company (“MLAC“) announcement of the contemplated "going private" transaction and above the priceat which the stockmight otherwise trade.  There can be no assurance such transaction will close.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

According to the announcement by Messrs. Quinn and Fuller on behalf of their company, MLAC, the offer, when and if made, is a “going-private” transaction in which MLAC would obtain 100% ownership of the Company by purchasing all unaffiliated shares for cash at $20.00 per share.  This price is substantially higher than the market price existing before the announcement of the proposed tender offer and above the priceITEM 5.          at whichthe stock might otherwise trade.  The announcement noted that the proposed tender offer is conditioned on, among other things, MLAC’s receipt of proceeds under its financing commitment from SunTrust Bank and SunTrust Capital Markets, Inc., there being validly tendered and not withdrawn a number of shares of Class A common stock constituting a majority of the outstanding shares of Class A common stock not currently owned by the co-founders or their related entities, and there being validly tendered and not withdrawn a number of shares of Class A common stock that, together with shares already owned by the co-founders and their related entities, equals ninety percent (90%) of the issued and outstanding shares of Class A common stock and Class B common stock combined.  In addition to several conditions to closing, the financial markets have recently experienced volatility, including tightened credit conditions, which could impact the timing and success of the proposed tender offer.  If the proposed tender offer is not completed because the aforementioned or other conditions are not satisfied, or the transaction otherwise fails to close, the trading price of our Class A common stock could decrease to a much lower level.OTHER INFORMATION

Any statements by the Company are based solely on repetition of information provided by MLAC in its public filings.  The Company has not diligenced MLAC and strongly recommends that the Company's stockholders read the following documents when filed:  (i) MLAC’s tender offer statement on Schedule TO and (ii) the Company's solicitation/recommendation statement on Schedule 14D-9 regarding the proposed tender offer when they become available because they will contain important information.  Stockholders may obtain a free copy of these materials, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, at the Securities and Exchange Commission's web site atwww.sec.gov<http://www.sec.gov/>.  Stockholders also may obtain, without charge, a copy of the Company's solicitation/recommendation statement, when available, by directing requests to Debbie Massengale at 423-510-3314.

Not applicable.
25Page 37

ITEM 6.          EXHIBITS
Period
 
Total Number of Shares Purchased
  
Average Price Paid Per Share
  
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs(1)
  
Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs(1)
 
April 1, 2007 – April 30, 2007  -  $-   -  $11,282,399 
May1, 2007 –  May 31, 2007  -   -   -   11,282,399 
June 1, 2007 – June 30, 2007  -   -   -   11,282,399 
Total
  
-
  $
-
   
-
  $
11,282,399
 
 
(1)Exhibit
In January, 2007, our Board of Directors authorized us to repurchase up to $15.0 million of our Class A common stock on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions.  This authorization has been approved by the lending group on the credit facility for the same amount.  The stock may be repurchased at any time until January 26, 2008, unless further extended by our Board.

The annual meeting of stockholders of U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc. was held on May 11, 2007. Proxies for the meeting were solicited by the Board of Directors pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act, and there was no solicitation in opposition to the Board’s proposals.

The stockholders voted on the following matters with the results indicated:

(1)              Election of Directors

The stockholders elected each of the five director nominees, as listed in the Definitive Proxy Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 11, 2007 (File No. 0-24806).

The voting tabulation on the election of directors was as follows:
  
Votes
FOR
  
Votes
WITHHELD
  
ABSTENTIONS
 
Patrick E. Quinn  16,297,346   495,495   0 
Max L. Fuller  16,368,714   424,127   0 
James E. Hall  16,511,715   281,126   0 
John W. Murrey, III  16,429,848   362,993   0 
Robert J. Sudderth, Jr.  16,511,015   281,826   0 


Item 5.Number
Description
Effective August 9, 2007, the Company approved entering into Indemnification Agreements with each of Max L. Fuller, Patrick E. Quinn, Robert J. Sudderth, James E. Hall,Second Amended and John W. Murrey, III (individually, a "Director," collectively, the “Directors”). 
The Indemnification Agreements provide, among other terms, that: (i) the Company shall indemnify and hold harmless the Director, to the fullest extent permitted by law, against any and all liabilities and assessments arising out of or related to any threatened, pending, or completed action, suit, proceeding, inquiry, or investigation, whether civil, criminal, administrative, or other (an “Action”), including, but not limited to, judgments, fines, penalties, and amounts paid in settlement (whether with or without court approval), and any interest, assessments, excise taxes, or other charges paid or payable in connection with or in respect of any of the foregoing (a “Liability”), incurred by the Director and arising out of his status as a director or member of a committee of the Company’s Board of Directors, or by reason of anything done or not done by the Director in such capacities; (ii) the Company shall also indemnify and hold harmless the Director, to the full extent permitted by law, against any and all attorneys' fees and other costs, expenses, and obligations, and any interest, assessments, excise taxes, or other charges paid or payable in connection with or in respect of any of the foregoing (an “Expense”) arising out of or relating to any Action; (iii) the Company shall not be liable under the Indemnification Agreements for payment of any Liability or Expense incurred by the Director if the Director has not met the standard of conduct for indemnification set forth in Section 78.7502 (or any statutes cross-referenced therein) of the Nevada Revised Statutes; (iv) if the Director is entitled under this Agreement to payment for some or a portion of any Liability or Expense relating to an Action, but not for the total amount thereof, the Company shall pay the Director for the portion thereof to which he is entitled; (v) subject to certain limitations, the Company will advance all Expenses incurred by the Director in connection with any Action; (vi) the indemnification provided by the Indemnification Agreements shall be in addition to any other right which the Director may have pursuant to any other agreement, any resolution of the Company’s Board of Directors, any resolution of the Company’s stockholders, any provision of the Company’s Restated Articles of Incorporation or Restated Bylaws, or any statute or rule of law providing for indemnification; and (vii) the Company will establish an escrow for the benefit of all of the Directors by depositing into escrow an amount in cash equal to $250,000.00 for the payment of sums payable by the Company under the Indemnification Agreements and to cover certain deductible amounts payable under the Company's policy of directors’ and officers’ liability insurance.  The indemnification provided under the Indemnification Agreements shall continue for any action taken while serving in an indemnified capacity even though the Director may have ceased to serve as a director.

Item 6.
(a)Exhibits
(1)
3.1Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company.
(2)
3.2Restated Bylaws of the Company.
(1)
4.1Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company filed as Exhibit 3.1 to this report and incorporated herein by reference
(2)
4.2Restated Bylaws of the Company filed as Exhibit 3.2 to this report and incorporated herein by reference.
(1)
4.3Agreement of Right of First Refusal with regard to Class B Shares of the Company dated May 11, 1994, by and between Max L. Fuller and Patrick E. Quinn.
(3)
10.1Employment Agreement, dated June 20, 2007, by and between Arnold Transportation Services, Inc., a subsidiary of U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc., dated and Michael S. Walters.
effective as of June 8, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 filed with the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A (File No. 333-224711) filed on June 11, 2018).
Amended and Restated Bylaws of U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc., dated and effective as of June 8, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 filed with the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A (File No. 333-224711) filed on June 11, 2018).
The Executive Nonqualified Excess Plan Adoption Agreement.
Certification pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a),Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation S-K, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
by Eric Fuller, the Company's Principal Executive Officer
#
Certification pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a),Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation S-K, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
2002, by Eric Peterson, the Company's Principal Financial Officer
#
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
2002, by Eric Fuller, the Company's Chief Executive Officer
#
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.2002, by Eric Peterson, the Company's Chief Financial Officer
101.INS#XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH#XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL#XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF#XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB#XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document
101.PRE#XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

(1)
Incorporated by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed May 20, 1994 (File No. 33-79208).
*          Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
(2)
Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 9, 2004 (File No. 0-24806).
#          Filed herewith.
(3)
Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 21, 2007 (File No. 0-24806).
#Filed##        Furnished herewith.


SIGNATURESSIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


 
U.S. XPRESS ENTERPRISES, INC.
(Registrant)
  
  
Date: May 7, 2019
By:/s/ Eric Peterson
Date:August 9, 2007
By:
/s/Ray M. Harlin
Eric Peterson
  
Ray M. Harlin
Chief Financial Officer