GREAT SOUTHERN BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(In thousands, except per share data)

								Accumulated
								Other
	Common		Additional		Retained			Comprehensive			Treasury
	Stock		Paid-in Capital		Earnings			Income (Loss)			Stock			Total
	(Unaudited)

Balance, March 31, 2018	$	141	$	28,624	$	451,603		$	(368	)	$	—		$	480,000
Net income		—		—		13,839			—			—			13,839
Stock issued under Stock Option
Plan		—		510		—			—			299			809
Common dividends declared,
$0.28 per share		—		—		(3,957	)		—			—			(3,957	)
Other comprehensive gain (loss)		—		—		—			(420	)		—			(420	)
Reclassification of treasury stock
per Maryland law		—		—		299			—			(299	)		—

Balance, June 30, 2018	$	141	$	29,134	$	461,784		$	(788	)	$	—		$	490,271

								Accumulated
								Other
	Common		Additional		Retained			Comprehensive		Treasury
	Stock		Paid-in Capital		Earnings			Income (Loss)		Stock			Total
	(Unaudited)

Balance, March 31, 2019	$	142	$	30,916	$	494,181		$	18,396	$	—		$	543,635
Net income		—		—		18,375			—		—			18,375
Stock issued under Stock Option
Plan		—		687		—			—		415			1,102
Common dividends declared,
$0.32 per share		—		—		(4,544	)		—		—			(4,544	)
Purchase of the Company’s
common stock		—		—		—			—		—			—
Other comprehensive gain		—		—		—			13,741		—			13,741
Reclassification of treasury stock
per Maryland law		—		—		415			—		(415	)		—

Balance, June 30, 2019	$	142	$	31,603	$	508,427		$	32,137	$	—		$	572,309

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

GREAT SOUTHERN BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF ~~COMPREHENSIVE INCOME~~STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(In ~~thousands)~~thousands, except per share data)

THREE MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30,

2018 2017
(Unaudited)

Net Income $ 13,839 $ 16,176

Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on available-for-sale securities,
net of taxes (credit) of $(121) and $(31), for 2018 and 2017, respectively
(420 ) (54 )

Change in fair value of cash flow hedge, net of taxes of $0 and $26,
for 2018 and 2017, respectively
— 46

Comprehensive Income $ 13,419 $ 16,168

								Accumulated
								Other
	Common		Additional		Retained			Comprehensive			Treasury
	Stock		Paid-in Capital		Earnings			Income (Loss)			Stock			Total
	(Unaudited)

Balance, January 1, 2018	$	141	$	28,203	$	442,077		$	1,241		$	—		$	471,662
Net income		—		—		27,305			—			—			27,305
Stock issued under Stock Option
Plan		—		931		—			—			582			1,513
Common dividends declared,
$0.56 per share		—		—		(7,908	)		—			—			(7,908	)
Reclassification of stranded tax
effects resulting from change in
Federal income tax rate		—		—		(272	)		272			—			—
Other comprehensive gain (loss)		—		—		—			(2,301	)		—			(2,301	)
Reclassification of treasury stock
per Maryland law		—		—		582			—			(582	)		—

Balance, June 30, 2018	$	141	$	29,134	$	461,784		$	(788	)	$	—		$	490,271

SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30,

2018 2017
(Unaudited)

Net Income $ 27,305 $ 27,695

Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on available-for-sale securities, net
of taxes (credit) of $(662) and $207, for 2018 and 2017, respectively
(2,301 ) 363

Change in fair value of cash flow hedge, net of taxes of $0
and $55, for 2018 and 2017, respectively
— 97

Comprehensive Income $ 25,004 $ 28,155

								Accumulated
								Other
	Common		Additional		Retained			Comprehensive		Treasury
	Stock		Paid-in Capital		Earnings			Income (Loss)		Stock			Total
	(Unaudited)

Balance, January 1, 2019	$	142	$	30,121	$	492,087		$	9,627	$	—		$	531,977
Net income		—		—		35,988			—		—			35,988
Stock issued under Stock Option
Plan		—		1,482		—			—		892			2,374
Common dividends declared,
$1.39 per share		—		—		(19,691	)		—		—			(19,691	)
Purchase of the Company’s
common stock		—		—		—			—		(849	)		(849	)
Other comprehensive gain		—		—		—			22,510		—			22,510
Reclassification of treasury stock
per Maryland law		—		—		43			—		(43	)		—

Balance, June 30, 2019	$	142	$	31,603	$	508,427		$	32,137	$	—		$	572,309

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

GREAT SOUTHERN BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

	SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,						SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
	2018			2017			2019			2018
	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	27,305		$	27,695		$	35,988		$	27,305
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale		49,629			55,619			34,375			49,629
Originations of loans held for sale		(45,218	)		(61,984	)		(43,145	)		(45,218	)
Items not requiring (providing) cash:
Depreciation		4,569			4,632			4,631			4,569
Amortization		1,296			1,396			1,059			1,296
Compensation expense for stock option grants		357			273			443			357
Provision for loan losses		3,900			4,200			3,550			3,900
Net gains on loan sales		(1,021	)		(1,624	)		(623	)		(1,021	)
Net realized gains on sales of available-for-sale securities								(10	)		—
Net losses on sale of premises and equipment		94			144			21			94
Net (gains) losses on sale/write-down of other real estate owned		2,184			(602	)
Gain realized on termination of loss sharing agreements		—			(7,704	)
Net losses on sale/write-down of other real estate owned and repossessions								161			2,184
Accretion of deferred income, premiums, discounts and other		(1,287	)		(972	)		(1,990	)		(1,287	)
(Gain) loss on derivative interest rate products		(48	)		13			68			(48	)
Deferred income taxes		(6,544	)		(4,183	)		578			(6,544	)
Changes in:
Interest receivable		(111	)		1,057			(903	)		(111	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		6,084			(1,441	)		(2,031	)		6,084
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		1,857			1,172			4,443			1,857
Income taxes refundable/payable		7,370			4,184			2,555			7,370
Net cash provided by operating activities		50,416			21,875			39,170			50,416
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Net change in loans		(101,884	)		105,431			(83,072	)		(101,884	)
Purchase of loans		(42,179	)		(117,799	)		(45,240	)		(42,179	)
Cash received from FDIC loss sharing reimbursements		—			16,245
Purchase of premises and equipment		(6,054	)		(2,699	)		(6,708	)		(6,054	)
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment		23			474			113			23
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned and repossessions		8,856			15,956			4,537			8,856
Capitalized costs on other real estate owned		(143	)		(117	)		—			(143	)
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities								28,057			—
Proceeds from maturities and calls of held-to-maturity securities		130			117			—			130
Proceeds from maturities and calls of available-for-sale securities		2,031			6,345			7,870			2,031
Principal reductions on mortgage-backed securities		10,530			12,450			7,402			10,530
Purchase of available-for-sale securities		(6,689	)		—			(94,558	)		(6,689	)
Redemption (purchase) of Federal Home Loan Bank stock		(4,496	)		192			1,345			(4,496	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(139,875	)		36,595
Net cash used in investing activities								(180,254	)		(139,875	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net increase (decrease) in certificates of deposit		13,616			(99,487	)
Net decrease in checking and savings deposits		(13,655	)		(4,992	)
Net increase in certificates of deposit								139,518			13,616
Net increase (decrease) in checking and savings deposits								24,040			(13,655	)
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances		1,454,500			—			—			1,454,500
Repayments of Federal Home Loan Bank advances		(1,323,000	)		(31,435	)		—			(1,323,000	)
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings		(232	)		11,334
Net decrease in short-term borrowings								(30,710	)		(232	)
Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance		2,638			3,235			5,458			2,638
Dividends paid		(7,332	)		(6,155	)		(19,674	)		(7,332	)
Purchase of the Company’s common stock								(849	)		—
Stock options exercised		1,156			1,766			1,931			1,156
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		127,691			(125,734	)
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		38,232			(67,264	)
Net cash provided by financing activities								119,714			127,691
INCREASES ( DECREASES) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS								(21,370	)		38,232
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD		242,253			279,769			202,742			242,253
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD	$	280,485		$	212,505		$	181,372		$	280,485

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

GREAT SOUTHERN BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1: BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of Great Southern Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company" or "Great Southern") have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. The financial statements presented herein reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to fairly present the financial condition, results of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented. Those adjustments consist only of normal recurring adjustments. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year. The consolidated statement of financial condition of the Company as of December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, has been derived from the audited consolidated statement of financial condition of the Company as of that date. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on net income.

Certain information and note disclosures normally included in the Company's annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for ~~2017~~2018 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

NOTE 2: NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND OPERATING SEGMENTS

The Company operates as a one-bank holding company. The ~~Company's~~Company’s business primarily consists of the operations of Great Southern Bank (the ~~"Bank"~~“Bank”), which provides a full range of financial services to customers primarily located in Missouri, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Nebraska and Arkansas. ~~In addition, the Company operates~~The Bank also originates commercial ~~loan production~~loans from lending offices in Dallas, Texas, Tulsa, ~~Oklahoma~~Okla., Chicago, Ill., Atlanta, Ga., Denver, Colo. and ~~Chicago, Illinois.~~Omaha, Neb. The Company and the Bank are subject to ~~the regulations of~~regulation by certain federal and state agencies and undergo periodic examinations by those regulatory agencies.

The ~~Company's~~Company’s banking operation is its only reportable segment. The banking operation is principally engaged in the business of originating residential and commercial real estate loans, construction loans, commercial business loans and consumer loans and funding these loans ~~through~~by attracting deposits from the general public, accepting brokered deposits and borrowing from the Federal Home Loan Bank and others. The operating results of this segment are regularly reviewed by management to make decisions about resource allocations and to assess performance. Selected information is not presented separately for the ~~Company's~~Company’s reportable segment, as there is no material difference between that information and the corresponding information in the consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 3: RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

~~In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14,~~ ~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date, which deferred the effective date of ASU 2014-09. In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09,~~ Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Summary and Amendments that Create Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and Other Assets and Deferred Costs--Contracts with Customers (Subtopic 340-40)~~. The guidance in this Update supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC Topic 605,~~ ~~Revenue Recognition~~, and most industry-specific guidance throughout the industry topics of the codification. These Updates were effective beginning January 1, 2018. Our revenue is comprised of net interest income on financial assets and financial liabilities, which is explicitly excluded from the scope of ASU 2014-09, and non-interest income. We have determined that certain components of our non-interest income contain revenue streams which are included in the scope of these updates, such as deposit-related fees, service charges, debit card interchange fees and other charges

and fees, and revenue from the sale of other real estate owned; however the adoption of these updates did not materially impact the Company's consolidated statements of income. We adopted the guidance using the modified retrospective adoption method, and no cumulative effect adjustment to opening retained earnings was required as a result of the adoption.

Under ASU 2014-09, for revenue not associated with financial instruments, we apply the following steps when recognizing revenue from contracts with customers: (i) identify the contract, (ii) identify the performance obligations, (iii) determine the transaction price, (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations and (v) recognize revenue when performance obligation is satisfied. Our contracts with customers are generally short term in nature, typically due within one year or less or cancellable by us or our customer upon a short notice period. Performance obligations for our customer contracts are generally satisfied at a single point in time, typically when the transaction is complete, or over time. For performance obligations satisfied over time, we primarily use the output method, directly measuring the value of the products/services transferred to the customer, to determine when performance obligations have been satisfied. We typically receive payment from customers and recognize revenue concurrent with the satisfaction of our performance obligations. In most cases, this occurs within a single financial reporting period. For payments received in advance of the satisfaction of performance obligations, revenue recognition is deferred until such time the performance obligations have been satisfied. In cases where we have not received payment despite satisfaction of our performance obligations, we accrue an estimate of the amount due in the period our performance obligations have been satisfied. For contracts with variable components, only amounts for which collection is probable are accrued. We generally act in a principal capacity, on our own behalf, in most of our contracts with customers. In such transactions, we recognize revenue and the related costs to provide our services on a gross basis in our financial statements. In some cases, we act in an agent capacity, deriving revenue through assisting other entities in transactions with our customers. In such transactions, we recognize revenue and the related costs to provide our services on a net basis in our financial statements. These transactions primarily relate to fees derived from our customers' use of various interchange and ATM/debit card networks.

~~In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01,~~ ~~Financial Instruments – Overall (Topic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities~~. The Update requires investments in equity securities, except for those under the equity method of accounting, to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized through net income. The update enhances the reporting model for financial instruments to provide users of financial statements with more decision-useful information by updating certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments. Among other changes, the update requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes. The Update also clarified guidance related to the valuation allowance assessment when recognizing deferred tax assets resulting from unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities. The Update was effective for the Company on January 1, 2018 and did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated statements of financial condition or our consolidated statements of income.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) and in July 2018 FASB issued ASU No. 2018-10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases. The amendments in this Update revise the accounting related to lessee accounting. Under the new guidance, lessees ~~will be~~are required to recognize a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for all leases. The Update isbecame effective for the Company ~~beginning in the first quarter of 2019, with early adoption permitted.~~on January 1, 2019. Adoption of the standard ~~requires~~required the use of a modified retrospective transition approach for all periods presented at the time of adoption. Based on the ~~Company's~~Company’s leases outstanding at ~~June 30,~~December 31, 2018, which ~~total~~totaled less than 20 leased properties ~~we do not expect~~and no significant leased equipment, the adoption of the new standard todid not have a material impact on our consolidated statements of financial condition or our consolidated statements of income, although an increase to assets and liabilities ~~will occur~~occurred at the time of adoption. ~~The Company's~~In the first quarter of 2019, the Company recognized a lease liability and a corresponding right-of-use asset for all leases of $9.5 million based on the lease portfolio at that time. Subsequent to December 31, 2018, the Company’s lease terminations, new leases and lease modifications and renewals ~~prior to the implementation date could~~will impact the ~~level~~amount of ~~materiality.~~lease liability and a corresponding right-of-use asset recognized. The

Company’s leases are currently all “operating leases” as defined in the Update; therefore, no material change in the income statement presentation of lease expense occurred in the three and six months ended June 30, 2019. The Company’s lease activities are discussed further in Note 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326). The Update amends guidance on reporting credit losses for assets held at amortized cost ~~basis~~ and available for sale debt securities. For assets held at amortized cost, ~~basis,~~ Topic 326 eliminates the probable initial recognition threshold in current GAAP and, instead, requires an entity to reflect its current estimate of all expected credit losses. This Update affects entities holding financial assets and net investment in leases that are not accounted for at fair value through net income. The amendments affect loans, debt securities, trade receivables, net investments in leases, off balance sheet credit exposures, reinsurance receivables, and any other financial assets not excluded from the scope that have the

contractual right to receive cash. For public companies, the update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. ~~Early adoption will be permitted beginning after December 15, 2018.~~ An entity will apply the amendments in this update on a modified retrospective basis, through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. The Company ~~has~~previously formed a ~~cross functional~~cross-functional committee to oversee the system, data, reporting and other considerations for ~~the~~ purposes of meeting the requirements of this standard. ~~We have assessed our data~~Data and system needs were assessed. As a result, third-party software was acquired and ~~are in~~implemented to manage the ~~process~~data. We have completed the upload of ~~uploading~~ the necessary historical loan data to the software that will be used in meeting certain requirements of this standard. ~~The~~Our loss data covers multiple credit cycles back to 2003. Parallel testing of the new methodology compared to the current methodology has been performed throughout 2019 and the Company ~~is evaluating~~continues to evaluate the impact of adopting the new ~~guidance, including~~guidance. We have engaged a third party to perform validation of the ~~implementation~~accuracy of ~~new data systems to capture~~our inputs into the ~~information needed to comply with the new standard.~~model. This review is currently in process. We expect to recognize a one-time cumulative effect adjustment to the allowance for loan losses as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the new standard is effective for us (the three-month period ending March 31, 2020), but cannot yet determine the ~~magnitude~~exact amount of any such one-time adjustment, or the overall impact of the new guidance on the ~~Company's~~Company’s consolidated financial statements. Based on the current modeling results, we anticipate that the one-time cumulative effect adjustment will be less than five percent of total stockholders’ equity.

~~In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15,~~ ~~Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)~~. The Update provides guidance on how certain cash receipts and payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. These items include: cash payments for debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs; cash outflows for the settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments or other debt instruments with coupon interest rates that are insignificant; contingent consideration payments made after a business combination; proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims; proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies, including bank-owned life insurance policies; and beneficial interests acquired in securitization transactions. The amendments in the Update are to be applied retrospectively. The Update was effective for the Company on January 1, 2018 and did not result in a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements, including the statement of cash flows.

~~In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16,~~ ~~Income Taxes (Topic 740)~~. The Update provides guidance on the accounting for the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory. Under this guidance, companies will be required to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity asset transfer when the transfer occurs. The Update was effective for the Company on January 1, 2018. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

~~In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01,~~ ~~Business Combinations - Clarifying the Definition of a Business (Topic 805)~~. The amendments in this Update provide a more robust framework to use in determining when a set of assets and activities is a business. The amendments provide more consistency in applying the guidance, reduce the costs of application, and make the definition of a business more operable. The amendments in this Update were effective for the Company on January 1, 2018. The adoption of this new guidance must be applied on a prospective basis and did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles: Goodwill and Other: Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (Topic 350). To simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill, the amendments eliminate Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. The annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test should be performed by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount and an impairment charge should be recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting ~~unit's~~unit’s fair value. An entity still has the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the qualitative impairment test is necessary. The nature of and reason for the change in accounting principle should be disclosed upon transition. The amendments in this update should be adopted for annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted on testing dates after January 1, 2017. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting the new guidance, including consideration of early adoption, on the consolidated financial statements, but it is not expected to have a material impact.

In ~~May 2017,~~August 2018, the FASB issued ASU ~~2017-09,~~ 2018-13~~Compensation --Stock Compensation~~, Fair Value Measurement (Topic ~~718): Scope of Modification Accounting. The amendment provides guidance on determining which changes~~820) - Disclosure Framework-Changes to the ~~terms and conditions of share-based payment awards require an entity to apply modification accounting under Topic 7l8. The amendments clarify that modification accounting only applies to an entity if~~Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. ASU 2018-13 modifies the disclosure requirements on fair value ~~vesting conditions, or classification of the award changes as a result of changes~~measurements in ~~the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award.~~Topic 820. The

ASU should be applied prospectively to awards modified on or after the adoption date. The guidance was effective for the Company on January 1, 2018. The adoption of the ASU did not impact the Company's consolidated financial statements.

~~In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12,~~ ~~Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities~~. The objective of ASU 2017-12 is to improve the financial reporting of hedging relationships by better aligning an entity's risk management activity with the economic objectives in undertaking those activities. In addition, the amendments in this update ~~simplify~~remove disclosures that no longer are considered cost beneficial, modify/clarify the ~~application~~specific requirements of ~~hedge accounting for preparers of financial statements,~~certain disclosures, and add disclosure requirements identified as ~~well as improve the understandability of an entity's risk management activities being conveyed to financial statement users. The new guidance becomes~~relevant. ASU 2018-13 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, ~~2018. Early~~2019, with early adoption permitted for certain removed and modified disclosures, and is ~~permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the new guidance and timing of adoption~~not expected to ~~determine the~~have a significant impact ~~this standard may have~~ on ~~its~~our financial statements.

~~In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02,~~ ~~Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Topic 220).~~ The amendment allows an entity to elect to reclassify the stranded tax effects resulting from the change in income tax rate from H.R.1, originally known as the "Tax Cuts and Jobs Act," from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings. The amendments in this update are effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company chose to early adopt ASU 2018-02 effective January 1, 2018. The stranded tax amount related to unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities, which was reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings at the time of adoption, was $272,000. There were no other income tax effects related to the application of the Act to be reclassified from AOCI to retained earnings.

NOTE 4: EARNINGS PER SHARE

Three Months Ended June 30,
2018 2017
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

Basic:
Average shares outstanding 14,125 14,027
Net income $ 13,839 $ 16,176
Per share amount $ 0.98 $ 1.15

Diluted:
Average shares outstanding 14,125 14,027
Net effect of dilutive stock options – based on the treasury
stock method using average market price 153 179
Diluted shares 14,278 14,206
Net income $ 13,839 $ 16,176
Per share amount $ 0.97 $ 1.14

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2019		2018
	(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

Basic:
Average common shares outstanding		14,192		14,125
Net income and net income available to common stockholders	$	18,375	$	13,839
Per common share amount	$	1.29	$	0.98

Diluted:
Average common shares outstanding		14,192		14,125
Net effect of dilutive stock options – based on the treasury
stock method using average market price		122		153
Diluted common shares		14,314		14,278
Net income and net income available to common stockholders	$	18,375	$	13,839
Per common share amount	$	1.28	$	0.97

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019		2018
	(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

Basic:
Average common shares outstanding		14,176		14,113
Net income and net income available to common stockholders	$	35,988	$	27,305
Per common share amount	$	2.54	$	1.93

Diluted:
Average common shares outstanding		14,176		14,113
Net effect of dilutive stock options – based on the treasury
stock method using average market price		122		153
Diluted common shares		14,298		14,266
Net income and net income available to common stockholders	$	35,988	$	27,305
Per common share amount	$	2.52	$	1.91

Six Months Ended June 30,
2018 2017
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

Basic:
Average shares outstanding 14,113 14,010
Net income $ 27,305 $ 27,695
Per share amount $ 1.93 $ 1.98

Diluted:
Average shares outstanding 14,113 14,010
Net effect of dilutive stock options – based on the treasury
stock method using average market price 153 179
Diluted shares 14,266 14,189
Net income available to common stockholders $ 27,305 $ 27,695
Per share amount $ 1.91 $ 1.95

Options outstanding at June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, to purchase ~~161,400~~309,000 and ~~114,800~~161,400 shares of common stock, respectively, were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per common share for each of the three and six month periods because the exercise prices of such options were greater than the average market prices of the common stock for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, respectively.

NOTE 5: INVESTMENT SECURITIES

The amortized cost and fair values of securities classified as available-for-sale were as follows:

June 30, 2018
Gross Gross Tax
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Fair Equivalent
Cost Gains Losses Value Yield
(In Thousands)

AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE SECURITIES:
Mortgage-backed securities $ 119,078 $ 708 $ 3,421 $ 116,365 2.37 %
States and political subdivisions 51,907 1,707 8 53,606 4.81
$ 170,985 $ 2,415 $ 3,429 $ 169,971 3.11 %

	December 31, 2017											June 30, 2019
			Gross		Gross				Tax					Gross		Gross				Tax
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair		Equivalent			Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair		Equivalent
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value		Yield			Cost		Gains		Losses		Value		Yield
	(In Thousands)											(In Thousands)

AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE SECURITIES:
Mortgage-backed securities	$	123,300	$	871	$	1,638	$	122,533		2.19	%
Agency mortgage-backed securities												$	184,302	$	7,898	$	623	$	191,577		3.01	%
Agency collateralized mortgage obligations													69,761		2,098		52		71,807		3.24
States and political subdivisions		53,930		2,716		—		56,646		4.72			40,622		1,643		—		42,265		4.88
	$	177,230	$	3,587	$	1,638	$	179,179		2.96	%	$	294,685	$	11,639	$	675	$	305,649		3.32	%

HELD-TO-MATURITY SECURITIES:
States and political subdivisions	$	130	$	1	$	—	$	131		6.14	%

	December 31, 2018
			Gross		Gross				Tax
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair		Equivalent
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value		Yield
	(In Thousands)

AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE SECURITIES:
Agency mortgage-backed securities	$	154,557	$	1,272	$	2,571	$	153,258		2.83	%
Agency collateralized mortgage obligations		39,024		250		14		39,260		3.18
States and political subdivisions		50,022		1,428		—		51,450		4.81
	$	243,603	$	2,950	$	2,585	$	243,968		3.29	%

The amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale securities at June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities ~~may~~will differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

Amortized Fair
Cost Value
(In Thousands)

One year or less $ — $ —
After one through five years 831 905
After five through ten years 9,554 9,746
After ten years 41,522 42,955
Securities not due on a single maturity date 119,078 116,365

$ 170,985 $ 169,971

	Amortized			Fair
	Cost			Value
	(In Thousands)

One year or less		$	—		$	—
After one through five years			869			947
After five through ten years			10,133			10,495
After ten years			29,620			30,823
Securities not due on a single maturity date			254,063			263,384

		$	294,685		$	305,649

Certain investments in debt securities are reported in the financial statements at an amount less than their historical cost. Total fair value of these investments at June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, was approximately ~~$87.0~~$61.6 million and ~~$89.7~~$95.7 million, respectively, which is approximately ~~51.2%~~20.1% and ~~50.0%~~39.2% of the ~~Company's~~Company’s available-for-sale ~~and held-to-maturity~~ investment portfolio, respectively.

Based on an evaluation of available evidence, including recent changes in market interest rates, credit rating information and information obtained from regulatory filings, management believes the declines in fair value for these debt securities are temporary.

The following table shows the ~~Company's~~Company’s gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017:~~2018:

June 30, 2018
Less than 12 Months 12 Months or More Total
Fair Unrealized Fair Unrealized Fair Unrealized
Description of Securities Value Losses Value Losses Value Losses
(In Thousands)

Mortgage-backed securities $ 22,840 $ (694 ) $ 61,887 $ (2,727 ) $ 84,727 $ (3,421 )
State and political
subdivisions 2,281 (8 ) — — 2,281 (8 )
$ 25,121 $ (702 ) $ 61,887 $ (2,727 ) $ 87,008 $ (3,429 )

December 31, 2017
Less than 12 Months 12 Months or More Total
Fair Unrealized Fair Unrealized Fair Unrealized
Description of Securities Value Losses Value Losses Value Losses
(In Thousands)

Mortgage-backed securities $ 33,862 $ (384 ) $ 55,845 $ (1,254 ) $
89,707
$ (1,638 )
State and political
subdivisions — — — — — —
$ 33,862 $ (384 ) $ 55,845 $ (1,254 ) $ 89,707 $ (1,638 )

	June 30, 2019
	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
	Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized
Description of Securities	Value		Losses			Value		Losses			Value		Losses
	(In Thousands)

Agency mortgage-backed securities	$	1,734	$	(1	)	$	56,205	$	(622	)	$	57,939	$	(623	)
Agency collateralized mortgage obligations		3,624		(52	)		—		—			3,624		(52	)
	$	5,358	$	(53	)	$	56,205	$	(622	)	$	61,563	$	(675	)

	December 31, 2018
	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
	Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized
Description of Securities	Value		Losses			Value		Losses			Value		Losses
	(In Thousands)

Agency mortgage-backed securities	$	11,255	$	(82	)	$	74,186	$	(2,489	)	$	85,441	$	(2,571	)
Agency collateralized mortgage obligations		9,725		(14	)		—		—			9,725		(14	)
State and political
subdivisions		511		—			—		—			511		—
	$	21,491	$	(96	)	$	74,186	$	(2,489	)	$	95,677	$	(2,585	)

There were no sales of available-for-sale securities during the three months ended June 30, 2019. Gross gains of $226,000 and gross losses of $216,000 resulting from sales of available-for-sale securities were realized during the six months ended June 30, 2019. There were no sales of available-for-sale securities during the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2018 and 2017, respectively.~~2018. Gains and losses on sales of securities are determined on the specific-identification method.

Other-than-temporary Impairment. Upon acquisition of a security, the Company decides whether it is within the scope of the accounting guidance for beneficial interests in securitized financial assets or will be evaluated for impairment under the accounting guidance for investments in debt and equity securities.

The accounting guidance for beneficial interests in securitized financial assets provides incremental impairment guidance for a subset of the debt securities within the scope of the guidance for investments in debt and equity securities. For securities where the security is a beneficial interest in securitized financial assets, the Company uses the beneficial interests in securitized financial asset impairment model. For securities where the security is not a beneficial interest in securitized financial assets, the Company uses the debt and equity securities impairment model. The Company does not currently have securities within the scope of this guidance for beneficial interests in securitized financial assets.

The Company routinely conducts periodic reviews to identify and evaluate each investment security to determine whether an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred. The Company considers the length of time a security has been in an unrealized loss position, the relative amount of the unrealized loss compared to the carrying value of the security, the type of security and other factors. If certain criteria are met, the Company performs additional review and evaluation using observable market values or various inputs in economic models to determine if an

unrealized loss is other-than-temporary. The Company uses quoted market prices for marketable equity securities and uses broker pricing quotes based on observable inputs for equity investments that are not traded on a stock exchange. For non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations, to determine if the unrealized loss is other than temporary, the Company projects total estimated defaults of the underlying assets (mortgages) and multiplies that calculated amount by an estimate of realizable value upon sale in the marketplace (severity) in order to determine the projected collateral loss. The Company also evaluates any current credit enhancement underlying these securities to determine the impact on cash flows. If the Company determines that a given security position will be subject to a write-down or loss, the Company records the expected credit loss as a charge to earnings.

During the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, respectively, no securities were determined to have impairment that had become other-than-temporary.

Credit Losses Recognized on Investments. During the three ~~and six~~ months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, respectively, there were ~~nodebt~~no debt securities that had experienced fair value deterioration due to credit losses, or due to other market factors, ~~that are~~but were not otherwise other-than-temporarily impaired.

Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. ~~During~~Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income and the affected line items in the statements of income during the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, are shown below.

The FASB previously issued ASU 2018-02, Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Topic 220). The amendment allows an entity to elect to reclassify the stranded tax effects resulting from the change in income tax rate from H.R.1, originally known as the “Tax Cuts and ~~2017, there were no amounts reclassified~~Jobs Act” (the “Tax Act), from accumulated other comprehensive income ~~other than the $272,000~~to retained earnings. The Company chose to early adopt ASU 2018-02 effective January 1, 2018. The stranded tax amount related to unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities, ~~noted above in~~ ~~Note 1~~, which was reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings asat the time of ~~January 1, 2018 due~~adoption, was $272,000. There were no other income tax effects related to the ~~adoption~~application of ~~ASU 2018-02.~~the Tax Act to be reclassified from AOCI to retained earnings.

	Amounts Reclassified from Accumulated Other
	Comprehensive Income Three Months Ended June 30,				Affected Line Item in the
	2019		2018		Statements of Income
	(In Thousands)

Unrealized gains on available-					Net realized gains on sales of
for-sale securities	$	--	$	--	available-for-sale securities
					(Total reclassified amount before tax)
Income Taxes		--		--	Provision for income taxes
Total reclassifications out of accumulated
other comprehensive income	$	--	$	--

	Amounts Reclassified from Accumulated Other
	Comprehensive Income Six Months Ended June 30,					Affected Line Item in the
	2019			2018		Statements of Income
	(In Thousands)

Unrealized gains on available-						Net realized gains on sales of
for-sale securities	$	10		$	--	available-for-sale securities
						(Total reclassified amount before tax)
Income Taxes		(2	)		--	Provision for income taxes
Total reclassifications out of accumulated
other comprehensive income	$	8		$	--

NOTE 6: LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

Classes of loans at June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017~~2018 were as follows:

	June 30,			December 31,			June 30,			December 31,
	2018			2017			2019			2018
	(In Thousands)						(In Thousands)

One- to four-family residential construction	$	31,770		$	20,793		$	30,255		$	26,177
Subdivision construction		15,913			18,062			12,973			13,844
Land development		46,643			43,971			46,032			44,492
Commercial construction		1,258,564			1,068,352			1,391,158			1,417,166
Owner occupied one- to four-family residential		228,211			190,515			322,207			276,866
Non-owner occupied one- to four-family residential		112,416			119,468			122,858			122,438
Commercial real estate		1,307,966			1,235,329			1,446,166			1,371,435
Other residential		785,202			745,645			796,341			784,894
Commercial business		347,312			353,351			312,965			322,118
Industrial revenue bonds		20,021			21,859			13,643			13,940
Consumer auto		298,977			357,142			201,061			253,528
Consumer other		60,052			63,368			52,077			57,350
Home equity lines of credit		114,742			115,439			120,102			121,352
Loans acquired and accounted for under ASC 310-30, net of discounts		184,136			209,669			151,694			167,651
		4,811,925			4,562,963			5,019,532			4,993,251
Undisbursed portion of loans in process		(907,906	)		(793,669	)		(861,054	)		(958,441	)
Allowance for loan losses		(37,556	)		(36,492	)		(39,254	)		(38,409	)
Deferred loan fees and gains, net		(6,662	)		(6,500	)		(6,769	)		(7,400	)
	$	3,859,801		$	3,726,302		$	4,112,455		$	3,989,001

Weighted average interest rate		4.96	%		4.74	%		5.25	%		5.16	%

1315

Classes of loans by aging were as follows:

	June 30, 2018														June 30, 2019
													Total Loans														Total Loans
											Total		> 90 Days												Total		> 90 Days
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		Over		Total				Loans		Past Due and		30-59 Days		60-89 Days		Over		Total				Loans		Past Due and
	Past Due		Past Due		90 Days		Past Due		Current		Receivable		Still Accruing		Past Due		Past Due		90 Days		Past Due		Current		Receivable		Still Accruing
	(In Thousands)														(In Thousands)

One- to four-family
residential construction	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	31,770	$	31,770	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	30,255	$	30,255	$	—
Subdivision construction		—		—		91		91		15,822		15,913		—		44		—		—		44		12,929		12,973		—
Land development		594		—		—		594		46,049		46,643		—		—		72		3,556		3,628		42,404		46,032		—
Commercial construction		—		—		—		—		1,258,564		1,258,564		—		—		—		—		—		1,391,158		1,391,158		—
Owner occupied one- to
four-family residential		100		267		848		1,215		226,996		228,211		—		726		189		999		1,914		320,293		322,207		—
Non-owner occupied one-
to four-family residential		359		479		1,743		2,581		109,835		112,416		—		170		293		533		996		121,862		122,858		—
Commercial real estate		6,267		412		352		7,031		1,300,935		1,307,966		—		1,121		954		3,675		5,750		1,440,416		1,446,166		—
Other residential		—		—		—		—		785,202		785,202		—		422		—		—		422		795,919		796,341		—
Commercial business		40		201		2,852		3,093		344,219		347,312		—		194		36		1,359		1,589		311,376		312,965		—
Industrial revenue bonds		—		—		—		—		20,021		20,021		—		—		—		—		—		13,643		13,643		—
Consumer auto		2,876		437		1,482		4,795		294,182		298,977		—		1,601		436		661		2,698		198,363		201,061		—
Consumer other		570		62		441		1,073		58,979		60,052		—		288		38		252		578		51,499		52,077		—
Home equity lines of credit		154		166		316		636		114,106		114,742		—		284		59		353		696		119,406		120,102		—
Loans acquired and
accounted for under
ASC 310-30, net of
discounts		868		1,067		6,876		8,811		175,325		184,136		—
Loans acquired and accounted for under
ASC 310-30, net of discounts																983		340		6,612		7,935		143,759		151,694		—
		11,828		3,091		15,001		29,920		4,782,005		4,811,925		—		5,833		2,417		18,000		26,250		4,993,282		5,019,532		—
Less loans acquired and accounted for under
ASC 310-30, net		868		1,067		6,876		8,811		175,325		184,136		—		983		340		6,612		7,935		143,759		151,694		—

Total	$	10,960	$	2,024	$	8,125	$	21,109	$	4,606,680	$	4,627,789	$	—	$	4,850	$	2,077	$	11,388	$	18,315	$	4,849,523	$	4,867,838	$	—

1416

December 31, 2017
Total Loans
Total > 90 Days Past
30-59 Days 60-89 Days Over 90 Total Past Loans Due and
Past Due Past Due Days Due Current Receivable Still Accruing
(In Thousands)

One- to four-family
residential construction $ 250 $ — $ — $ 250 $ 20,543 $ 20,793 $ —
Subdivision construction — — 98 98 17,964 18,062 —
Land development 54 37 — 91 43,880 43,971 —
Commercial construction — — — — 1,068,352 1,068,352 —
Owner occupied one- to
four-family residential 1,927 71 904 2,902 187,613 190,515 —
Non-owner occupied one-
to four-family residential 947 190 1,816 2,953 116,515 119,468 58
Commercial real estate 8,346 993 1,226 10,565 1,224,764 1,235,329 —
Other residential 540 353 1,877 2,770 742,875 745,645 —
Commercial business 2,623 1,282 2,063 5,968 347,383 353,351 —
Industrial revenue bonds — — — — 21,859 21,859 —
Consumer auto 5,196 1,230 2,284 8,710 348,432 357,142 12
Consumer other 464 64 557 1,085 62,283 63,368 —
Home equity lines of credit 58 — 430 488 114,951 115,439 26
Loans acquired and
    accounted for under
    ASC 310-30, net of
discounts 4,449 1,951 10,675 17,075 192,594 209,669 272
24,854 6,171 21,930 52,955 4,510,008 4,562,963 368
Less loans acquired and
    accounted for under
    ASC 310-30, net
4,449 1,951 10,675 17,075 192,594 209,669 272

Total $ 20,405 $ 4,220 $ 11,255 $ 35,880 $ 4,317,414 $ 4,353,294 $ 96

	December 31, 2018
													Total Loans
											Total		> 90 Days Past
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		Over 90		Total Past				Loans		Due and
	Past Due		Past Due		Days		Due		Current		Receivable		Still Accruing
	(In Thousands)

One- to four-family
residential construction	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	26,177	$	26,177	$	—
Subdivision construction		—		—		—		—		13,844		13,844		—
Land development		13		—		49		62		44,430		44,492		—
Commercial construction		—		—		—		—		1,417,166		1,417,166		—
Owner occupied one- to
four-family residential		1,431		806		1,206		3,443		273,423		276,866		—
Non-owner occupied one-
to four-family residential		1,142		144		1,458		2,744		119,694		122,438		—
Commercial real estate		3,940		53		334		4,327		1,367,108		1,371,435		—
Other residential		—		—		—		—		784,894		784,894		—
Commercial business		72		54		1,437		1,563		320,555		322,118		—
Industrial revenue bonds		3		—		—		3		13,937		13,940		—
Consumer auto		2,596		722		1,490		4,808		248,720		253,528		—
Consumer other		691		181		240		1,112		56,238		57,350		—
Home equity lines of credit		229		—		86		315		121,037		121,352		—
Loans acquired and accounted for under
ASC 310-30, net of discounts		2,195		1,416		6,827		10,438		157,213		167,651		—
		12,312		3,376		13,127		28,815		4,964,436		4,993,251		—
Less loans acquired and accounted for under ASC 310-30, net		2,195		1,416		6,827		10,438		157,213		167,651		—

Total	$	10,117	$	1,960	$	6,300	$	18,377	$	4,807,223	$	4,825,600	$	—

Nonaccruing loans (excluding FDIC-assisted acquired loans, net of discount) are summarized as follows:

	June 30,		December 31,		June 30,		December 31,
	2018		2017		2019		2018
	(In Thousands)				(In Thousands)

One- to four-family residential construction	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Subdivision construction		91		98		—		—
Land development		—		—		3,556		49
Commercial construction		—		—		—		—
Owner occupied one- to four-family residential		848		904		999		1,206
Non-owner occupied one- to four-family residential		1,743		1,758		533		1,458
Commercial real estate		352		1,226		3,675		334
Other residential		—		1,877		—		—
Commercial business		2,852		2,063		1,359		1,437
Industrial revenue bonds		—		—		—		—
Consumer auto		1,482		2,272		661		1,490
Consumer other		441		557		252		240
Home equity lines of credit		316		404		353		86

Total	$	8,125	$	11,159	$	11,388	$	6,300

1517

The following table presents the activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2018.~~2019. Also presented are the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans based on portfolio segment and impairment method as of June 30, ~~2018:~~2019:

	One- to Four-																					One- to Four-
	Family																					Family
	Residential and			Other			Commercial			Commercial			Commercial									Residential and			Other			Commercial			Commercial			Commercial
	Construction			Residential			Real Estate			Construction			Business			Consumer			Total			Construction			Residential			Real Estate			Construction			Business			Consumer			Total
	(In Thousands)																					(In Thousands)

Allowance for loan losses
Balance April 1, 2018	$	2,602		$	3,212		$	18,062		$	2,188		$	3,695		$	6,551		$	36,310
Balance, April 1, 2019																						$	3,036		$	5,436		$	20,981		$	2,515		$	1,484		$	5,199		$	38,651
Provision (benefit) charged to expense		63			364			1,297			109			(454	)		571			1,950			805			(1,683	)		1,382			1,145			62			(111	)		1,600
Losses charged off		(27	)		(75	)		—			(46	)		(472	)		(2,112	)		(2,732	)		(62	)		—			(7	)		(189	)		(25	)		(1,699	)		(1,982	)
Recoveries		89			344			115			144			222			1,114			2,028			24			—			11			8			157			785			985
Balance June 30, 2018	$	2,727		$	3,845		$	19,474		$	2,395		$	2,991		$	6,124		$	37,556
Balance, June 30, 2019																						$	3,803		$	3,753		$	22,367		$	3,479		$	1,678		$	4,174		$	39,254

Balance January 1, 2018	$	2,108		$	2,839		$	18,639		$	1,767		$	3,581		$	7,558		$	36,492
Balance, January 1, 2019																						$	3,122		$	4,713		$	19,803		$	3,105		$	1,568		$	6,098		$	38,409
Provision (benefit) charged to expense		487			969			811			471			28			1,134			3,900			1,163			(960	)		2,545			574			(90	)		318			3,550
Losses charged off		(41	)		(331	)		(102	)		(83	)		(881	)		(4,934	)		(6,372	)		(517	)		—			(7	)		(220	)		(99	)		(3,905	)		(4,748	)
Recoveries		173			368			126			240			263			2,366			3,536			35			—			26			20			299			1,663			2,043
Balance June 30, 2018	$	2,727		$	3,845		$	19,474		$	2,395		$	2,991		$	6,124		$	37,556
Balance, June 30, 2019																						$	3,803		$	3,753		$	22,367		$	3,479		$	1,678		$	4,174		$	39,254

Ending balance:
Individually evaluated for
impairment	$	737		$	—		$	220		$	—		$	1,422		$	641		$	3,020		$	237		$	—		$	555		$	—		$	470		$	155		$	1,417
Collectively evaluated for
impairment	$	1,953		$	3,817		$	18,988		$	2,322		$	1,545		$	5,443		$	34,068		$	3,490		$	3,720		$	21,645		$	3,290		$	1,195		$	3,992		$	37,332
Loans acquired and
accounted for under
ASC 310-30	$	37		$	28		$	266		$	73		$	24		$	40		$	468
accounted for under ASC
310-30																						$	76		$	33		$	167		$	189		$	13		$	27		$	505

Loans
Individually evaluated for
impairment	$	6,740		$	1,015		$	8,313		$	15		$	3,350		$	3,330		$	22,763		$	3,182		$	—		$	7,809		$	3,556		$	1,451		$	1,821		$	17,819
Collectively evaluated for
impairment	$	381,570		$	784,187		$	1,299,653		$	1,305,192		$	363,983		$	470,441		$	4,605,026		$	485,111		$	796,341		$	1,438,357		$	1,433,634		$	325,157		$	371,419		$	4,850,019
Loans acquired and
accounted for under
ASC 310-30	$	103,903		$	13,193		$	36,857		$	3,404		$	4,444		$	22,335		$	184,136
accounted for under ASC
310-30																						$	84,909		$	12,448		$	31,083		$	4,739		$	3,674		$	14,841		$	151,694

1618

The following table presents the activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2017:~~2018:

One- to Four-
Family
Residential and Other Commercial Commercial Commercial
Construction Residential Real Estate Construction Business Consumer Total
(In Thousands)

Allowance for loan losses
Balance April 1, 2017 $ 2,857 $ 3,790 $ 15,487 $ 2,497 $ 4,671 $ 7,691 $ 36,993
Provision (benefit) charged
to expense
(427 ) (147 ) 1,246 (724 ) (661 ) 2,663 1,950
Losses charged off (41 ) (2 ) (1,291 ) (92 ) — (2,565 ) (3,991 )
Recoveries 24 14 — 30 355 1,158 1,581
Balance June 30, 2017 $ 2,413 $ 3,655 $ 15,442 $ 1,711 $ 4,365 $ 8,947 $ 36,533

Balance January 1, 2017 $ 2,322 $ 5,486 $ 15,938 $ 2,284 $ 3,015 $ 8,355 $ 37,400
Provision (benefit) charged
to expense
122 (1,898 ) 770 (223 ) 1,224 4,205 4,200
Losses charged off (76 ) (2 ) (1,292 ) (387 ) (275 ) (5,968 ) (8,000 )
Recoveries 45 69 26 37 401 2,355 2,933
Balance June 30, 2017 $ 2,413 $ 3,655 $ 15,442 $ 1,711 $ 4,365 $ 8,947 $ 36,533

	One- to Four-
	Family
	Residential and			Other			Commercial			Commercial			Commercial
	Construction			Residential			Real Estate			Construction			Business			Consumer			Total
	(In Thousands)

Allowance for loan losses
Balance April 1, 2018	$	2,602		$	3,212		$	18,062		$	2,188		$	3,695		$	6,551		$	36,310
Provision (benefit) charged to expense		63			364			1,297			109			(454	)		571			1,950
Losses charged off		(27	)		(75	)		—			(46	)		(472	)		(2,112	)		(2,732	)
Recoveries		89			344			115			144			222			1,114			2,028
Balance June 30, 2018	$	2,727		$	3,845		$	19,474		$	2,395		$	2,991		$	6,124		$	37,556

Balance January 1, 2018	$	2,108		$	2,839		$	18,639		$	1,767		$	3,581		$	7,558		$	36,492
Provision (benefit) charged to expense		487			969			811			471			28			1,134			3,900
Losses charged off		(41	)		(331	)		(102	)		(83	)		(881	)		(4,934	)		(6,372	)
Recoveries		173			368			126			240			263			2,366			3,536
Balance June 30, 2018	$	2,727		$	3,845		$	19,474		$	2,395		$	2,991		$	6,124		$	37,556

The following table presents the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans based on portfolio segment and impairment method as of December 31, ~~2017:~~2018:

	One- to Four-														One- to Four-
	Family														Family
	Residential and		Other		Commercial		Commercial		Commercial						Residential and		Other		Commercial		Commercial		Commercial
	Construction		Residential		Real Estate		Construction		Business		Consumer		Total		Construction		Residential		Real Estate		Construction		Business		Consumer		Total
	(In Thousands)														(In Thousands)

Allowance for loan losses
Individually evaluated for
impairment	$	513	$	—	$	599	$	—	$	2,140	$	699	$	3,951	$	694	$	—	$	613	$	—	$	309	$	425	$	2,041
Collectively evaluated for
impairment	$	1,564	$	2,813	$	17,843	$	1,690	$	1,369	$	6,802	$	32,081	$	2,392	$	4,681	$	18,958	$	3,029	$	1,247	$	5,640	$	35,947
Loans acquired and
accounted for under ASC
310-30	$	31	$	26	$	197	$	77	$	72	$	57	$	460	$	36	$	32	$	232	$	76	$	12	$	33	$	421

Loans
Individually evaluated for
impairment	$	6,950	$	2,907	$	8,315	$	15	$	3,018	$	4,129	$	25,334	$	6,116	$	—	$	3,501	$	14	$	1,844	$	2,464	$	13,939
Collectively evaluated for
impairment	$	341,888	$	742,738	$	1,227,014	$	1,112,308	$	372,192	$	531,820	$	4,327,960	$	433,209	$	784,894	$	1,367,934	$	1,461,644	$	334,214	$	429,766	$	4,811,661
Loans acquired and
accounted for under ASC
310-30	$	120,295	$	14,877	$	39,210	$	3,806	$	5,275	$	26,206	$	209,669	$	93,841	$	12,790	$	33,620	$	4,093	$	4,347	$	18,960	$	167,651

The portfolio segments used in the preceding three tables correspond to the loan classes used in all other tables in Note 6 as follows:

·	The one- to four-family residential and construction segment includes the one- to four-family residential construction, subdivision construction, owner occupied one- to four-family residential and non-owner occupied one- to four-family residential classes

The one- to four-family residential and construction segment includes the one- to four-family residential construction, subdivision construction, owner occupied one- to four-family residential and non-owner occupied one- to four-family residential classes

The other residential segment corresponds to the other residential class

·	~~The other residential segment corresponds to the other residential class~~

·•	The commercial real estate segment includes the commercial real estate and industrial revenue bonds classes

·	~~The commercial construction segment includes the land development and commercial construction classes~~

The commercial construction segment includes the land development and commercial construction classes

·	~~The commercial business segment corresponds to the commercial business class~~

The commercial business segment corresponds to the commercial business class

·	~~The consumer segment includes the consumer auto, consumer other and home equity lines of credit classes~~

The consumer segment includes the consumer auto, consumer other and home equity lines of credit classes

A loan is considered impaired, in accordance with the impairment accounting guidance (FASB ASC 310-10-35-16), when based on current information and events, it is probable the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due from the borrower in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan. Impaired loans include not only nonperforming loans but also include loans modified in troubled debt restructurings where concessions have been granted to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties.

Impaired loans (excluding FDIC-assisted loans, net of discount), are summarized as follows:

June 30, 2018
Unpaid
Recorded Principal Specific
Balance Balance Allowance

One- to four-family residential
construction
$ — $ — $ —
Subdivision construction 335 357 110
Land development 15 18 —
Commercial construction — — —
Owner occupied one- to four-family residential 3,261 3,579 284
Non-owner occupied one- to four-family residential 3,144 3,465 343
Commercial real estate 8,313 8,468 220
Other residential 1,015 1,015 —
Commercial business 3,350 4,754 1,422
Industrial revenue bonds — — —
Consumer auto 2,033 2,228 369
Consumer other 784 1,007 118
Home equity lines of credit 513 553 154

Total $ 22,763 $ 25,444 $ 3,020

	June 30, 2019
			Unpaid
	Recorded		Principal		Specific
	Balance		Balance		Allowance
	(In Thousands)
One- to four-family residential construction	$	—	$	—	$	—
Subdivision construction		261		261		100
Land development		3,556		3,588		—
Commercial construction		—		—		—
Owner occupied one- to four-family residential		2,157		2,434		114
Non-owner occupied one- to four-family residential		764		944		22
Commercial real estate		7,809		7,834		555
Other residential		—		—		—
Commercial business		1,451		1,918		470
Industrial revenue bonds		—		—		—
Consumer auto		1,040		1,230		133
Consumer other		417		651		20
Home equity lines of credit		364		380		3

Total	$	17,819	$	19,240	$	1,417

Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 30, 2018 June 30, 2018
Average Average
Investment Interest Investment Interest
in Impaired Income in Impaired Income
Loans Recognized Loans Recognized
(In Thousands)

One- to four-family residential construction $ — $ — $ — $ —
Subdivision construction 338 2 354 8
Land development 15 — 15 —
Commercial construction — — — —
Owner occupied one- to four-family residential 3,272 44 3,283 89
Non-owner occupied one- to four-family residential 3,225 38 3,331 92
Commercial real estate 7,391 145 7,328 223
Other residential 1,017 10 1,714 20
Commercial business 3,559 258 3,625 289
Industrial revenue bonds — — — —
Consumer auto 2,034 40 2,247 81
Consumer other 879 18 874 37
Home equity lines of credit 528 9 548 28

Total $ 22,258 $ 564 $ 23,319 $ 867

At or for the Year Ended December 31, 2017
Average
Unpaid Investment Interest
Recorded Principal Specific in Impaired Income
Balance Balance Allowance Loans Recognized
(In Thousands)

One- to four-family residential
construction
$ — $ — $ — $ 193 $ —
Subdivision construction 349 367 114 584 22
Land development 15 18 — 1,793 24
Commercial construction — — — — —
Owner occupied one- to four-family residential 3,405 3,723 331 3,405 166
Non-owner occupied one- to four-family residential 3,196 3,465 68 2,419 165
Commercial real estate 8,315 8,490 599 9,075 567
Other residential 2,907 2,907 — 3,553 147
Commercial business 3,018 4,222 2,140 5,384 173
Industrial revenue bonds — — — — —
Consumer auto 2,713 2,898 484 2,383 222
Consumer other 825 917 124 906 69
Home equity lines of credit 591 648 91 498 33

Total $ 25,334 $ 27,655 $ 3,951 $ 30,193 $ 1,588

June 30, 2017
Unpaid
Recorded Principal Specific
Balance Balance Allowance
(In Thousands)

One- to four-family residential construction $ 380 $ 380 $ —
Subdivision construction 498 512 120
Land development 457 545 —
Commercial construction — — —
Owner occupied one- to four-family residential 3,475 3,766 357
Non-owner occupied one- to four-family residential 2,189 2,446 88
Commercial real estate 5,945 6,303 67
Other residential 3,582 3,600 —
Commercial business 6,973 7,827 3,189
Industrial revenue bonds — — —
Consumer auto 2,272 2,462 412
Consumer other 885 998 133
Home equity lines of credit 359 431 58

Total $ 27,015 $ 29,270 $ 4,424

Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 30, 2017 June 30, 2017
Average Average
Investment Interest Investment Interest
in Impaired Income in Impaired Income
Loans Recognized Loans Recognized
(In Thousands)

One- to four-family residential construction $ 382 $ — $ 386 $ —
Subdivision construction 701 5 756 12
Land development 3,069 5 3,267 21
Commercial construction — — — —
Owner occupied one- to four-family residential 3,302 43 3,356 80
Non-owner occupied one- to four-family residential 2,066 26 1,999 48
Commercial real estate 9,056 101 10,193 159
Other residential 3,719 37 3,761 75
Commercial business 6,979 40 6,432 126
Industrial revenue bonds — — — —
Consumer auto 2,029 48 2,211 77
Consumer other 857 24 827 39
Home equity lines of credit 339 8 367 18

Total $ 32,499 $ 337 $ 33,555 $ 655

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2019				June 30, 2019
	Average				Average
	Investment		Interest		Investment		Interest
	in Impaired		Income		in Impaired		Income
	Loans		Recognized		Loans		Recognized
	(In Thousands)

One- to four-family residential construction	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Subdivision construction		280		3		293		5
Land development		1,189		99		601		99
Commercial construction		—		—		—		—
Owner occupied one- to four-family residential		2,839		20		3,097		57
Non-owner occupied one- to four-family residential		815		6		1,296		18
Commercial real estate		6,349		86		5,612		136
Other residential		—		—		—		—
Commercial business		1,626		26		1,700		58
Industrial revenue bonds		—		—		—		—
Consumer auto		1,088		18		1,240		43
Consumer other		401		11		432		22
Home equity lines of credit		290		10		254		17

Total	$	14,877	$	279	$	14,525	$	455

	At or for the Year Ended December 31, 2018
							Average
			Unpaid				Investment		Interest
	Recorded		Principal		Specific		in Impaired		Income
	Balance		Balance		Allowance		Loans		Recognized
	(In Thousands)

One- to four-family residential construction	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Subdivision construction		318		318		105		321		17
Land development		14		18		—		14		1
Commercial construction		—		—		—		—		—
Owner occupied one- to four-family residential		3,576		3,926		285		3,406		197
Non-owner occupied one- to four-family residential		2,222		2,519		304		2,870		158
Commercial real estate		3,501		3,665		613		6,216		337
Other residential		—		—		—		1,026		20
Commercial business		1,844		2,207		309		2,932		362
Industrial revenue bonds		—		—		—		—		—
Consumer auto		1,874		2,114		336		2,069		167
Consumer other		479		684		72		738		59
Home equity lines of credit		111		128		17		412		28

Total	$	13,939	$	15,579	$	2,041	$	20,004	$	1,346

	June 30, 2018
			Unpaid
	Recorded		Principal		Specific
	Balance		Balance		Allowance
	(In Thousands)
One- to four-family residential construction	$	—	$	—	$	—
Subdivision construction		335		357		110
Land development		15		18		—
Commercial construction		—		—		—
Owner occupied one- to four-family residential		3,261		3,579		284
Non-owner occupied one- to four-family residential		3,144		3,465		343
Commercial real estate		8,313		8,468		220
Other residential		1,015		1,015		—
Commercial business		3,350		4,754		1,422
Industrial revenue bonds		—		—		—
Consumer auto		2,033		2,228		369
Consumer other		784		1,007		118
Home equity lines of credit		513		553		154

Total	$	22,763	$	25,444	$	3,020

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2018				June 30, 2018
	Average				Average
	Investment		Interest		Investment		Interest
	in Impaired		Income		in Impaired		Income
	Loans		Recognized		Loans		Recognized
	(In Thousands)

One- to four-family residential construction	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Subdivision construction		338		2		354		8
Land development		15		—		15		—
Commercial construction		—		—		—		—
Owner occupied one- to four-family residential		3,272		44		3,283		89
Non-owner occupied one- to four-family residential		3,225		38		3,331		92
Commercial real estate		7,391		145		7,328		223
Other residential		1,017		10		1,714		20
Commercial business		3,559		258		3,625		289
Industrial revenue bonds		—		—		—		—
Consumer auto		2,034		40		2,247		81
Consumer other		879		18		874		37
Home equity lines of credit		528		9		548		28

Total	$	22,258	$	564	$	23,319	$	867

At June 30, ~~2018, $9.7~~2019, $6.2 million of impaired loans had specific valuation allowances totaling ~~$3.0~~$1.4 million. At December 31, ~~2017, $12.7~~2018, $8.4 million of impaired loans had specific valuation allowances totaling ~~$4.0~~$2.0 million.

Included in certain loan categories in the impaired loans are troubled debt restructurings that were classified as impaired. Troubled debt restructurings are loans that are modified by granting concessions to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties. These concessions could include a reduction in the interest rate on the loan, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions intended to maximize collection. The types of concessions made are factored into the estimation of the allowance for loan losses for troubled debt restructurings primarily using a discounted cash flow or collateral adequacy approach.

The following tables present newly restructured loans during the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, respectively, by type of modification:

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2019
							Total
	Interest Only		Term		Combination		Modification
	(In Thousands)

Consumer	$	—	$	52	$	—	$	52

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2018
							Total
	Interest Only		Term		Combination		Modification
	(In Thousands)

Consumer	$	—	$	287	$	—	$	287

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2019
							Total
	Interest Only		Term		Combination		Modification
	(In Thousands)

Consumer	$	—	$	79	$	—	$	79

Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
Total
Interest Only Term Combination Modification
(In Thousands)

Consumer $ — $ 5 $ — $ 5

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
							Total
	Interest Only		Term		Combination		Modification
	(In Thousands)

Mortgage loans on real estate:
One- to four-family residential	$	1,348	$	—	$	—	$	1,348
Consumer		—		439		—		439

	$	1,348	$	439	$	—	$	1,787

Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
Total
Interest Only Term Combination Modification
(In Thousands)

Commercial business $ — $ — $ 274 $ 274
Consumer — 5 — 5

$ — $ 5 $ 274 $ 279

At June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the Company had ~~$13.4~~$2.0 million of loans that were modified in troubled debt restructurings and impaired, as follows: ~~$259,000~~$261,000 of construction and land development loans, ~~$5.5 million~~$787,000 of ~~single family~~one- to four-family and ~~multi-family~~other residential mortgage loans, ~~$6.0 million~~$428,000 of commercial real estate loans, ~~$836,000~~$178,000 of commercial business loans and ~~$886,000~~$391,000 of consumer loans. Of the total troubled debt restructurings at June 30, ~~2018, $11.1~~2019, $1.5 million were accruing interest and ~~$7.5 million~~$619,000 were classified as substandard using the ~~Company's~~Company’s internal grading system, which is described below. The Company had no troubled debt restructurings which were modified in the previous 12 months and subsequently defaulted during the six months ended June 30, ~~2018.~~2019. When loans modified as troubled debt restructurings have subsequent payment defaults, the defaults are factored into the determination of the allowance for loan losses to ensure specific valuation allowances reflect amounts considered uncollectible. At

December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, the Company had ~~$15.0~~$6.9 million of loans that were modified in troubled debt restructurings and impaired, as follows: ~~$266,000~~$283,000 of construction and land development loans, ~~$6.2~~$3.9 million of ~~single family~~one- to four-family and ~~multi-family~~other residential mortgage loans, ~~$7.1~~$1.3 million of commercial real estate loans, ~~$867,000~~$548,000 of commercial business loans and ~~$617,000~~$803,000 of consumer loans. Of the total troubled debt restructurings at December 31, ~~2017, $12.3~~2018, $4.7 million were accruing interest and ~~$8.8~~$2.5 million were classified as substandard using the ~~Company's~~Company’s internal grading system.The Company had no troubled debt restructurings which were modified in the previous 12 months and subsequently defaulted during the year ended December 31, 2018.

During the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2018, $16,000~~2019, $14,000 and ~~$39,000~~$63,000 of loans, respectively, all of which consisted of ~~one- to four-family residential~~consumer loans, designated as troubled debt restructurings met the criteria for placement back on accrual status. The criteria is generally a minimum of six months of consistent and timely payment performance under original or modified terms. During the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2017, $111,000~~2018, loans designated as troubled debt restructurings totaling $16,000 and ~~$345,000 of loans,~~$39,000, respectively, all of which consisted of one- to ~~four- family residential~~four-family loans, ~~designated as troubled debt restructurings~~ met the criteria for placement back on accrual status.

The Company reviews the credit quality of its loan portfolio using an internal grading system that classifies loans as ~~"Satisfactory," "Watch," "Special~~“Satisfactory,” “Watch,” “Special Mention,~~" "Substandard"~~” “Substandard” and ~~"Doubtful."~~“Doubtful.” Loans classified as watch are being monitored because of indications of potential weaknesses or deficiencies that may require future classification as special mention or substandard. Special mention loans possess potential weaknesses that deserve ~~management's~~management’s close attention but do not expose the Bank to a degree of risk that warrants substandard classification. Substandard loans are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if certain deficiencies are not corrected. Doubtful loans are those having all the weaknesses inherent to those classified Substandard with the added characteristics that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable. Loans not meeting any of the criteria previously described are considered satisfactory. The FDIC-assisted acquired loans are ~~also~~ evaluated using this internal grading ~~system and~~system. These loans are accounted for in pools. Minimal adverse classification in these acquired loan pools was identified as of June 30 ~~2018~~, 2019 and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, respectively. See Note 7 for further discussion of the acquired loan pools and the termination of the loss sharing agreements.

The Company evaluates the loan risk internal grading system definitions and allowance for loan loss methodology on an ongoing basis. The general component of the allowance for loan losses is affected by several factors, including, but not limited to, average historical losses, average life of the loans, the current composition of the loan portfolio, current and expected economic conditions, collateral values and internal risk ratings. Management considers all these factors in determining the adequacy of the ~~Company's~~Company’s allowance for loan losses. In early 2018, we expanded our loan risk rating system to allow for further segregation of satisfactory credits. No significant changes were made to the allowance for loan loss methodology during the past year.

The loan grading system is presented by loan class below:

June 30, 2018
Special
Satisfactory Watch Mention Substandard Doubtful Total
(In Thousands)

One- to four-family residential
construction $ 31,139 $ 631 $ — $ — $ — $ 31,770
Subdivision construction 13,749 2,073 — 91 — 15,913
Land development 41,943 4,700 — — — 46,643
Commercial construction 1,258,564 — — — — 1,258,564
Owner occupied one- to four-
family residential 226,388 — — 1,823 — 228,211
Non-owner occupied one- to
four-family residential 109,007 1,423 — 1,986 — 112,416
Commercial real estate 1,297,215 3,726 — 7,025 — 1,307,966
Other residential 783,381 1,821 — — — 785,202
Commercial business 339,344 5,048 — 2,920 — 347,312
Industrial revenue bonds 20,021 — — — — 20,021
Consumer auto 297,174 — — 1,803 — 298,977
Consumer other 59,390 12 — 650 — 60,052
Home equity lines of credit 114,240 — — 502 — 114,742
Loans acquired and accounted
for under ASC 310-30,
net of discounts 184,105 — — 31 — 184,136

Total $ 4,775,660 $ 19,434 $ — $ 16,831 $ — $ 4,811,925

	December 31, 2017												June 30, 2019
					Special												Special
	Satisfactory		Watch		Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total		Satisfactory		Watch		Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
	(In Thousands)												(In Thousands)

One- to four-family residential
construction	$	20,275	$	518	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	20,793	$	30,255	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	30,255
Subdivision construction		15,602		2,362		—		98		—		18,062		12,973		—		—		—		—		12,973
Land development		39,171		4,800		—		—		—		43,971		42,446		30		—		3,556		—		46,032
Commercial construction		1,068,352		—		—		—		—		1,068,352		1,391,158		—		—		—		—		1,391,158
Owner occupied one- to-four-
Owner occupied one- to four-
family residential		188,706		—		—		1,809		—		190,515		320,368		—		—		1,839		—		322,207
Non-owner occupied one- to-
Non-owner occupied one- to
four-family residential		117,103		389		—		1,976		—		119,468		121,952		373		—		533		—		122,858
Commercial real estate		1,218,431		9,909		—		6,989		—		1,235,329		1,407,401		31,280		—		7,485		—		1,446,166
Other residential		742,237		1,532		—		1,876		—		745,645		796,341		—		—		—		—		796,341
Commercial business		344,479		6,306		—		2,066		500		353,351		306,808		4,762		—		1,395		—		312,965
Industrial revenue bonds		21,859		—		—		—		—		21,859		13,643		—		—		—		—		13,643
Consumer auto		354,588		—		—		2,554		—		357,142		200,146		77		—		838		—		201,061
Consumer other		62,682		—		—		686		—		63,368		51,580		103		—		394		—		52,077
Home equity lines of credit		114,860		—		—		579		—		115,439		119,650		99		—		353		—		120,102
Loans acquired and accounted
for under ASC 310-30,
net of discounts		209,657		—		—		12		—		209,669		151,173		—		—		521		—		151,694

Total	$	4,518,002	$	25,816	$	—	$	18,645	$	500	$	4,562,963	$	4,965,894	$	36,724	$	—	$	16,914	$	—	$	5,019,532

2324

	December 31, 2018
					Special
	Satisfactory		Watch		Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
	(In Thousands)

One- to four-family residential
construction	$	25,803	$	374	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	26,177
Subdivision construction		12,077		1,718		—		49		—		13,844
Land development		39,892		4,600		—		—		—		44,492
Commercial construction		1,417,166		—		—		—		—		1,417,166
Owner occupied one- to-four-
family residential		274,661		43		—		2,162		—		276,866
Non-owner occupied one- to-
four-family residential		119,951		941		—		1,546		—		122,438
Commercial real estate		1,357,987		11,061		—		2,387		—		1,371,435
Other residential		784,393		501		—		—		—		784,894
Commercial business		315,518		5,163		—		1,437		—		322,118
Industrial revenue bonds		13,940		—		—		—		—		13,940
Consumer auto		251,824		116		—		1,588		—		253,528
Consumer other		56,859		157		—		334		—		57,350
Home equity lines of credit		121,134		118		—		100		—		121,352
Loans acquired and accounted
for under ASC 310-30,
net of discounts		167,632		—		—		19		—		167,651

Total	$	4,958,837	$	24,792	$	—	$	9,622	$	—	$	4,993,251

NOTE 7: FDIC-ACQUIRED LOANS

On March 20, 2009, Great Southern Bank entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with loss share with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to assume all of the deposits (excluding brokered deposits) and acquire certain assets of TeamBank, N.A., a full service commercial bank headquartered in Paola, Kansas.

The loans, commitments and foreclosed assets purchased in the TeamBank transaction were covered by a loss sharing agreement between the FDIC and Great Southern Bank. This agreement originally was to extend for ten years for 1-4 family real estate loans and for five years for other loans. The five-year period ended March 31, 2014 and the ten-year period was terminated early, effective April 26, 2016, by mutual agreement of Great Southern Bank and the FDIC. ~~See "Loss Sharing Agreements" below.~~ Based upon the acquisition date fair values of the net assets acquired, no goodwill was recorded.

On September 4, 2009, Great Southern Bank entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with loss share with the FDIC to assume all of the deposits and acquire certain assets of Vantus Bank, a full service thrift headquartered in Sioux City, Iowa.

The loans, commitments and foreclosed assets purchased in the Vantus Bank transaction were covered by a loss sharing agreement between the FDIC and Great Southern Bank. This agreement originally was to extend for ten years for 1-4 family real estate loans and for five years for other loans. The five year period ended September 30, 2014 and the ten-year period was terminated early, effective April 26, 2016, by mutual agreement of Great Southern Bank and the FDIC. ~~See "Loss Sharing Agreements" below.~~ Based upon the acquisition date fair values of the net assets acquired, no goodwill was recorded.

On October 7, 2011, Great Southern Bank entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with loss share with the FDIC to assume all of the deposits and acquire certain assets of Sun Security Bank, a full service bank headquartered in Ellington, Missouri.

The loans and foreclosed assets purchased in the Sun Security Bank transaction were covered by a loss sharing agreement between the FDIC and Great Southern Bank. This agreement originally was to extend for ten years for 1-4 family real estate loans and for five years for other loans but was terminated early, effective April 26, 2016, by mutual agreement of Great Southern Bank and the FDIC. ~~See "Loss Sharing Agreements" below.~~ Based upon the acquisition date fair values of the net assets acquired, no goodwill was recorded.

On April 27, 2012, Great Southern Bank entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with loss share with the FDIC to assume all of the deposits and acquire certain assets of Inter Savings Bank, FSB ~~("InterBank"~~(“InterBank”), a full service bank headquartered in Maple Grove, Minnesota.

The loans and foreclosed assets purchased in the InterBank transaction were covered by a loss sharing agreement between the FDIC and Great Southern Bank. This agreement originally was to extend for ten years for 1-4 family real estate loans and for five years for other loans but was terminated early, effective June 9, 2017, by mutual agreement of Great Southern Bank and the FDIC. ~~See "Loss Sharing Agreements" below.~~ Based upon the acquisition date fair values of the net assets acquired, no goodwill was recorded. A premium was recorded at the time of acquisition in conjunction with the fair value of the acquired loans and the amount amortized to yield during the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 was $47,000 and $70,000, respectively. The amount amortized to yield during the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 was $100,000 and $146,000, respectively.

On June 20, 2014, Great Southern Bank entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with the FDIC to purchase a substantial portion of the loans and investment securities, as well as certain other assets, and assume all of the deposits, as well as certain other liabilities, of Valley Bank, a full-service bank headquartered in Moline, Illinois, with significant operations in Iowa. This transaction did not include a loss sharing agreement.

Based upon the acquisition date fair values of the net assets acquired, no goodwill was recorded. A premium was recorded in conjunction with the fair value of the acquired loans and the amount amortized to yield during the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 was $0 and $63,000, respectively. The amount amortized to yield during the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 was $11,000 and $143,000, respectively.

Loss Sharing Agreements. On April 26, 2016, Great Southern Bank executed an agreement with the FDIC to terminate the loss sharing agreements for Team Bank, Vantus Bank and Sun Security Bank, effective immediately. The agreement required the FDIC to pay $4.4 million to settle all outstanding items related to the terminated loss sharing agreements. As a result of entering into the termination agreement, assets that were covered by the terminated loss sharing agreements were reclassified as non-covered assets effective April 26, 2016. All rights and obligations of the Bank and the FDIC under the terminated loss sharing agreements, including the settlement of all existing loss sharing and expense reimbursement claims, have been resolved and terminated.

On June 9, 2017, Great Southern Bank executed an agreement with the FDIC to terminate the loss sharing agreements for InterBank, effective immediately. Pursuant to the termination agreement, the FDIC paid $15.0 million to the Bank to settle all outstanding items related to the terminated loss sharing agreements. The Company recorded a pre-tax gain on the termination of $7.7 million. As a result of entering into the termination agreement, assets that were covered by the terminated loss sharing arrangements were reclassified as non-covered assets effective June 9, 2017. All rights and obligations of the Bank and the FDIC under the terminated loss sharing agreements, including the settlement of all existing loss sharing and expense reimbursement claims, have been resolved and terminated.

The termination of the loss sharing agreements for the TeamBank, Vantus Bank, Sun Security Bank and InterBank transactions ~~have~~has no impact on the yields for the loans that were previously covered under these agreements. All post-termination recoveries, gains, losses and expenses related to these previously covered assets are recognized entirely by Great Southern Bank since the FDIC no longer shares in such gains or losses. Accordingly, the ~~Company's~~Company’s earnings are positively impacted to the extent the Company recognizes gains on any sales or recoveries in excess of the carrying value of such assets. Similarly, the ~~Company's future~~Company’s earnings ~~will be~~are negatively impacted to the extent the Company recognizes expenses, losses or charge-offs related to such assets.

The following table presents the balances of the acquired loans related to the various FDIC-assisted transactions at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

							Sun Security
	TeamBank			Vantus Bank			Bank			InterBank			Valley Bank
	(In Thousands)

June 30, 2019
Gross loans receivable	$	9,347		$	12,096		$	19,266		$	73,696		$	50,488
Balance of accretable discount due to change in expected losses		(190	)		(32	)		(269	)		(2,691	)		(1,832	)
Net carrying value to loans receivable		(9,123	)		(11,834	)		(18,555	)		(64,863	)		(46,769	)
Expected loss remaining	$	34		$	230		$	442		$	6,142		$	1,887


December 31, 2018
Gross loans receivable	$	10,602		$	14,097		$	21,171		$	85,205		$	53,470
Balance of accretable discount due to change in expected losses		(399	)		(58	)		(342	)		(1,695	)		(169	)
Net carrying value to loans receivable		(10,106	)		(13,809	)		(20,171	)		(74,436	)		(49,124	)
Expected loss remaining	$	97		$	230		$	658		$	9,074		$	4,177

Fair Value and Expected Cash Flows. At the time of these acquisitions, the Company determined the fair value of the loan portfolios based on several assumptions. Factors considered in the valuations were projected cash flows for the loans, type of loan and related collateral, classification status, fixed or variable interest rate, term of loan, current discount rates and whether or not the loan was amortizing. Loans were grouped together according to similar characteristics and were treated in the aggregate when applying various valuation techniques. Management also estimated the amount of credit losses that were expected to be realized for the loan portfolios. The discounted cash flow approach was used to value each pool of loans. For non-performing loans, fair value was estimated by calculating the present value of the recoverable cash flows using a discount rate based on comparable corporate bond rates. This valuation of the acquired loans is a significant component leading to the valuation of the loss sharing assets recorded.

The amount of the estimated cash flows expected to be received from the acquired loan pools in excess of the fair values recorded for the loan pools is referred to as the accretable yield. The accretable yield is recognized as interest income over the estimated lives of the loans. The Company continues to evaluate the fair value of the loans including cash flows expected to be collected. Increases in the ~~Company's~~Company’s cash flow expectations are recognized as increases to the accretable yield while decreases are recognized as impairments through the allowance for loan losses. During the three ~~and six~~ months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, improvements in expected cash flows (reclassification of discounts from non-accretable to accretable) related to the acquired loan portfolios resulted in adjustments of $3.7 million and $725,000, respectively, to the accretable yield to be spread over the estimated remaining lives of the loans on a level-yield basis. During the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, improvements in expected cash flows (reclassification of discounts from non-accretable to accretable) related to the acquired loan portfolios resulted in adjustments of $5.3 million and $2.5 million, respectively, to the accretable yield to be spread over the estimated remaining lives of the loans on a level-yield basis. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, similar such adjustments totaling $-0- and $155,000, respectively, were made to the accretable yield. The increases in expected cash flows also reduced the amount of expected reimbursements under the loss sharing agreements, when applicable, until they were terminated or expired.

Because the balance of these adjustments to accretable yield will be recognized generally over the remaining lives of the loan pools, they will impact future periods as well. ~~The~~As of June 30, 2019, the remaining accretable yield adjustment that will affect interest income is ~~$2.9~~$5.1 million. Of the remaining adjustments affecting interest income, we expect to recognize ~~$1.4~~$2.0 million of interest income during the remainder of ~~2018.~~2019. Additional adjustments to accretable yield may be recorded in future periods from the FDIC-assisted transactions, as the Company continues to estimate expected cash flows from the acquired loan pools.

The impact to income of adjustments on the ~~Company's~~Company’s financial results is shown below:

	Three Months Ended			Three Months Ended			Three Months Ended			Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2018			June 30, 2017			June 30, 2019			June 30, 2018
	(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data						(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data
	and Basis Points Data)						and Basis Points Data)

Impact on net interest income/
net interest margin (in basis points)	$	1,070	10 bps	$	1,282	12 bps	$	1,399	12 bps	$	1,070	10 bps
Non-interest income		—			—
Net impact to pre-tax income	$	1,070		$	1,282		$	1,399		$	1,070
Net impact net of taxes	$	831		$	817		$	1,080		$	831
Impact to diluted earnings per share	$	0.06		$	0.06		$	0.08		$	0.06

	Six Months Ended			Six Months Ended				Six Months Ended			Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2018			June 30, 2017				June 30, 2019			June 30, 2018
	(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data							(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data
	and Basis Points Data)							and Basis Points Data)

Impact on net interest income/
net interest margin (in basis points)	$	2,227	11 bps	$	3,262		16 bps	$	2,911	13 bps	$	2,227	11 bps
Non-interest income		—			(634	)
Net impact to pre-tax income	$	2,227		$	2,628			$	2,911		$	2,227
Net impact net of taxes	$	1,729		$	1,674			$	2,247		$	1,729
Impact to diluted earnings per share	$	0.12		$	0.12			$	0.16		$	0.12

~~TeamBank Loans and Foreclosed Assets.~~ The following tables present the balances of the acquired loans and foreclosed assets related to the TeamBank transaction at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. Through June 30, 2018, gross loan balances (due from the borrower) were reduced approximately $424.0 million since the transaction date because of $291.3 million of repayments from borrowers, $61.7 million in transfers to foreclosed assets and $71.0 million in charge-offs to customer loan balances. Based upon the collectability analyses performed at the time of the acquisition, we expected certain levels of foreclosures and charge-offs and actual results have been better than our expectations. As a result, cash flows expected to be received from the acquired loan pools have increased, resulting in adjustments that were made to the related accretable yield as described above.

June 30, 2018
Foreclosed
Loans Assets
(In Thousands)

Initial basis for loss sharing determination,
net of activity since acquisition date $ 12,154 $ 35
Reclassification from nonaccretable discount to accretable discount
due to change in expected losses (net of accretion to date) (494 ) —
Original estimated fair value of assets, net of activity since
acquisition date (11,543 ) (35 )

Expected loss remaining $ 117 $ —

December 31, 2017
Foreclosed
Loans Assets
(In Thousands)

Initial basis for loss sharing determination,
net of activity since acquisition date $ 13,668 $ 35
Reclassification from nonaccretable discount to accretable discount
due to change in expected losses (net of accretion to date) (589 ) —
Original estimated fair value of assets, net of activity since
acquisition date (12,948 ) (35 )

Expected loss remaining $ 131 $ —

~~Vantus Bank Loans and Foreclosed Assets.~~ ~~The following tables present the balances of the acquired loans and foreclosed assets related to the Vantus Bank transaction at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.~~ ~~Through June 30, 2018, gross~~ loan balances (due from the borrower) were reduced approximately $315.0 million since the transaction date because of $269.3 million of repayments from borrowers, $16.7 million in transfers to foreclosed assets and $29.0 million in charge-offs to customer loan balances. Based upon the collectability analyses performed at the time of the acquisition, we expected certain levels of foreclosures and charge-offs and actual results have been better than our expectations. As a result, cash flows expected to be received from the acquired loan pools have increased, resulting in adjustments that were made to the related accretable yield as described above.

June 30, 2018
Foreclosed
Loans Assets
(In Thousands)

Initial basis for loss sharing determination,
net of activity since acquisition date $ 16,515 $ 15
Reclassification from nonaccretable discount to accretable discount
due to change in expected losses (net of accretion to date) (91 ) —
Original estimated fair value of assets, net of activity since
acquisition date (16,195 ) (15 )

Expected loss remaining $ 229 $ —

December 31, 2017
Foreclosed
Loans Assets
(In Thousands)

Initial basis for loss sharing determination,
net of activity since acquisition date $ 18,965 $ 15
Reclassification from nonaccretable discount to accretable discount
due to change in expected losses (net of accretion to date) (131 ) —
Original estimated fair value of assets, net of activity since
acquisition date (18,605 ) (15 )

Expected loss remaining $ 229 $ —

~~Sun Security Bank Loans and Foreclosed Assets.~~ ~~The following tables present the balances of the acquired loans and foreclosed assets related to the Sun Security Bank transaction at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.~~ ~~Through June 30, 2018, gross~~ loan balances (due from the borrower) were reduced approximately $211.5 million since the transaction date because of $152.0 million of repayments from borrowers, $28.6 million in transfers to foreclosed assets and $30.9 million of charge-offs to customer loan balances. Based upon the collectability analyses performed at the time of the acquisition, we expected certain levels of foreclosures and charge-offs and actual results have been better than our expectations. As a result, cash flows expected to be received from the acquired loan pools have increased, resulting in adjustments that were made to the related accretable yield as described above.

June 30, 2018
Foreclosed
Loans Assets
(In Thousands)

Initial basis for loss sharing determination,
net of activity since acquisition date $ 22,971 $ 383
Reclassification from nonaccretable discount to accretable discount
due to change in expected losses (net of accretion to date)
(453 ) —
Original estimated fair value of assets, net of activity since
acquisition date (21,757 ) (292 )

Expected loss remaining $ 761 $ 91

December 31, 2017
Foreclosed
Loans Assets
(In Thousands)

Initial basis for loss sharing determination,
net of activity since acquisition date $ 26,787 $ 306
Reclassification from nonaccretable discount to accretable discount
due to change in expected losses (net of accretion to date)
(494 ) —
Original estimated fair value of assets, net of activity since
acquisition date (25,348 ) (299 )

Expected loss remaining $ 945 $ 7

~~InterBank Loans and Foreclosed Assets.~~ ~~The following table presents the balances of the acquired loans and foreclosed assets related to the InterBank transaction at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.~~ ~~Through June 30, 2018, gross~~ loan balances (due from the borrower) were reduced approximately $297.4 million since the transaction date because of $255.3 million of repayments by the borrower, $19.7 million in transfers to foreclosed assets and $22.4 million of charge-offs to customer loan balances. Based upon the collectability analyses performed at the time of the acquisition, we expected certain levels of foreclosures and charge-offs and actual results have been better than our expectations. As a result, cash flows expected to be received from the acquired loan pools have increased, resulting in adjustments that were made to the related accretable yield as described above.

June 30, 2018
Foreclosed
Loans Assets
(In Thousands)

Initial basis for loss sharing determination,
net of activity since acquisition date $ 95,851 $ 1,477
Non-credit premium/(discount), net of activity since acquisition date 174 —
Reclassification from nonaccretable discount to accretable discount
due to change in expected losses (net of accretion to date) (1,413 ) —
Original estimated fair value of assets, net of activity since
acquisition date (82,987 ) (1,292 )

Expected loss remaining $ 11,625 $ 185

December 31, 2017
Foreclosed
Loans Assets
(In Thousands)

Initial basis for loss sharing determination,
net of activity since acquisition date $ 112,399 $ 2,012
Non-credit premium/(discount), net of activity since acquisition date 274 —
Reclassification from nonaccretable discount to accretable discount
due to change in expected losses (net of accretion to date) (972 ) —
Original estimated fair value of assets, net of activity since
acquisition date (98,321 ) (1,785 )

Expected loss remaining $ 13,380 $ 227

~~Valley Bank Loans and Foreclosed Assets.~~ ~~The following tables present the balances of the acquired loans and foreclosed assets related to the Valley Bank transaction at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.~~ ~~Through June 30, 2018, gross~~ loan balances (due from the borrower) were reduced approximately $136.9 million since the transaction date because of $125.0 million of repayments by the borrower, $4.0 million in transfers to foreclosed assets and $7.9 million of charge-offs to customer loan balances. Based upon the collectability analyses performed at the time of the acquisition, we expected certain levels of foreclosures and charge-offs and actual results have been better than our expectations. As a result, cash flows expected to be received from the acquired loan pools have increased, resulting in adjustments that were made to the related accretable yield as described above.

June 30 2018
Foreclosed
Loans Assets
(In Thousands)

Initial basis, net of activity since acquisition date $ 56,313 $ 1,637
Non-credit premium/(discount), net of activity since acquisition date — —
Reclassification from nonaccretable discount to accretable discount
due to change in expected losses (net of accretion to date) (412 ) —
Original estimated fair value of assets, net of activity since
acquisition date (51,649 ) (1,631 )

Expected loss remaining $ 4,252 $ 6

December 31, 2017
Foreclosed
Loans Assets
(In Thousands)

Initial basis, net of activity since acquisition date $ 59,997 $ 1,673
Non-credit premium/(discount), net of activity since acquisition date 11 —
Reclassification from nonaccretable discount to accretable discount
due to change in expected losses (net of accretion to date) (411 ) —
Original estimated fair value of assets, net of activity since
acquisition date (54,442 ) (1,667 )

Expected loss remaining $ 5,155 $ 6

Changes in the accretable yield for acquired loan pools were as follows for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017:~~2018:

							Sun Security															Sun Security
	TeamBank			Vantus Bank			Bank			InterBank			Valley Bank			TeamBank			Vantus Bank			Bank			InterBank			Valley Bank
	(In Thousands)															(In Thousands)

Balance, April 1, 2017	$	2,496		$	2,354		$	3,795		$	6,910		$	4,400
Balance, April 1, 2019																$	1,399		$	1,302		$	2,444		$	7,948		$	4,329
Accretion		(312	)		(383	)		(574	)		(1,885	)		(1,470	)		(180	)		(261	)		(340	)		(1,951	)		(1,132	)
Change in expected
accretable yield⁽¹⁾		119			209			465			389			383			131			186			(245	)		2,468			2,347

Balance, June 30, 2017	$	2,303		$	2,180		$	3,686		$	5,414		$	3,313
Balance, June 30, 2019																$	1,350		$	1,227		$	1,859		$	8,465		$	5,544

Balance, April 1, 2018	$	1,827		$	1,755		$	2,069		$	6,904		$	3,416		$	1,827		$	1,755		$	2,069		$	6,904		$	3,416
Accretion		(215	)		(338	)		(424	)		(1,827	)		(1,066	)		(215	)		(338	)		(424	)		(1,827	)		(1,066	)
Change in expected
accretable yield⁽¹⁾		130			235			410			833			624			130			235			410			833			624

Balance, June 30, 2018	$	1,742		$	1,652		$	2,055		$	5,910		$	2,974		$	1,742		$	1,652		$	2,055		$	5,910		$	2,974

(1)

Represents increases (decreases) in estimated cash flows expected to be received from the acquired loan pools, partially due to lower estimated credit losses. The amounts also include changes in expected accretion of the loan pools for TeamBank, Vantus Bank, Sun Security Bank, InterBank and Valley Bank for the three months ended June 30, 2019, totaling $68,000, $186,000, $(336,000), $468,000 and $839,000, respectively, and for the three months ended June 30, 2018, totaling $115,000, $235,000, $236,000, $518,000 and $404,000, respectively.

							Sun Security
	TeamBank			Vantus Bank			Bank			InterBank			Valley Bank
	(In Thousands)

Balance, January 1, 2019	$	1,356		$	1,432		$	2,242		$	4,994		$	3,063
Accretion		(615	)		(478	)		(781	)		(3,979	)		(1,985	)
Change in expected
accretable yield⁽¹⁾		609			273			398			7,450			4,466

Balance, June 30, 2019	$	1,350		$	1,227		$	1,859		$	8,465		$	5,544

Balance, January 1, 2018	$	2,071		$	1,850		$	2,901		$	5,074		$	2,695
Accretion		(442	)		(617	)		(854	)		(3,650	)		(2,197	)
Change in expected
accretable yield⁽¹⁾		113			419			8			4,486			2,476

Balance, June 30, 2018	$	1,742		$	1,652		$	2,055		$	5,910		$	2,974

(1)

Represents increases in estimated cash flows expected to be received from the acquired loan pools, partially due to lower estimated credit losses. The amounts also include changes in expected accretion of the loan pools for TeamBank, Vantus Bank, Sun Security Bank, InterBank and Valley Bank for the ~~three~~six months ended June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, totaling ~~$115,000, $235,000, $236,000, $518,000~~$546,000, $273,000, $247,000, $4.6 million and ~~$404,000,~~$2.2 million, respectively, and for the ~~three~~six months ended June ~~30, 2017, totaling $119,000, $209,000, $465,000, $389,000 and $383,000, respectively.~~

Sun Security
TeamBank Vantus Bank Bank InterBank Valley Bank
(In Thousands)

Balance, January 1, 2017 $ 2,477 $ 2,547 $ 4,277 $ 8,512 $ 4,797
Accretion (967 ) (739 ) (1,196 ) (4,162 ) (3,394 )
Change in expected
accretable yield⁽¹⁾
793 372 605 1,064 1,910

Balance, June 30, 2017 $ 2,303 $ 2,180 $ 3,686 $ 5,414 $ 3,313

Balance, January 1, 2018 $ 2,071 $ 1,850 $ 2,901 $ 5,074 $ 2,695
Accretion (442 ) (617 ) (854 ) (3,650 ) (2,197 )
Change in expected
accretable yield⁽¹⁾
113 419 8 4,486 2,476

Balance, June 30, 2018 $ 1,742 $ 1,652 $ 2,055 $ 5,910 $ 2,974

(1) Represents increases in estimated cash flows expected to be received from the acquired loan pools, partially due to lower estimated credit losses. The amounts also include changes in expected accretion of the loan pools for TeamBank, Vantus Bank, Sun Security Bank, InterBank and Valley Bank for the six months endedJune 30, 2018, totaling $98,000, $419,000, $(167,000), $2.9 million and $1.7 million, ~~respectively, and for the six months ended June 30, 2017, totaling $793,000, $367,000, $605,000, $1.1 million and $1.8 million,~~ respectively.

3228

NOTE 8: OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED AND REPOSSESSIONS

Major classifications of other real estate owned were as follows:

June 30, December 31,
2018 2017
(In Thousands)

Foreclosed assets held for sale and repossessions
One- to four-family construction $ — $ —
Subdivision construction 2,715 5,413
Land development 5,068 7,229
Commercial construction — —
One- to four-family residential 622 112
Other residential 1,744 140
Commercial real estate 1,745 1,694
Commercial business — —
Consumer 1,470 1,987
13,364 16,575
Foreclosed assets acquired through FDIC-assisted
transactions, net of discounts 3,274 3,799

Foreclosed assets held for sale and repossessions, net 16,638 20,374

Other real estate owned not acquired through foreclosure 1,628 1,628

Other real estate owned and repossessions $ 18,266 $ 22,002

	June 30,		December 31,
	2019		2018
	(In Thousands)

Foreclosed assets held for sale and repossessions
One- to four-family construction	$	—	$	—
Subdivision construction		918		1,092
Land development		2,584		3,191
Commercial construction		—		—
One- to four-family residential		—		269
Other residential		—		—
Commercial real estate		—		—
Commercial business		—		—
Consumer		999		928
		4,501		5,480
Foreclosed assets acquired through FDIC-assisted
transactions, net of discounts		1,301		1,401

Foreclosed assets held for sale and repossessions, net		5,802		6,881

Other real estate owned not acquired through foreclosure		1,305		1,559

Other real estate owned and repossessions	$	7,107	$	8,440

At June 30, ~~2018 and December 31, 2017,~~2019, other real estate owned not acquired through foreclosure included 10eight properties, seven of which were branch locations that were closed and are held for sale, and one of which is land acquired for a potential branch location.

At December 31, 2018, other real estate owned not acquired through foreclosure included nine properties, eight of which were branch locations that were closed and are held for sale, and one of which is land acquired for a potential branch location.

At June 30, 2019, residential mortgage loans totaling $511,000 were in the process of foreclosure, $501,000 of which were acquired loans. Of the $501,000 of acquired loans, $243,000 were previously covered by loss sharing agreements and $258,000 were acquired in the Valley Bank transaction.

At December 31, 2018, residential mortgage loans totaling ~~$1.6~~$1.3 million were in the process of foreclosure, ~~$1.3~~$1.0 million of which were acquired loans. Of the $1.0 million of acquired loans, $873,000 were previously covered by loss sharing agreements and $171,000 were acquired in the Valley Bank transaction.

Expenses applicable to other real estate owned and repossessions included the following:

	Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2018			2017			2019			2018
	(In Thousands)						(In Thousands)

Net gain on sales of other real estate and repossessions	$	(977	)	$	(225	)
Net gains on sales of other real estate owned and repossessions							$	(244	)	$	(977	)
Valuation write-downs		2,757			—			197			2,757
Operating expenses, net of rental income		957			902			466			957

	$	2,737		$	677		$	419		$	2,737

Six Months Ended
June 30,
2018 2017
(In Thousands)

Net gain on sales of other real estate and repossessions $ (1,449 ) $ (728 )
Valuation write-downs 3,373 —
Operating expenses, net of rental income 1,954 1,979

$ 3,878 $ 1,251

3329

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2019			2018
	(In Thousands)

Net gains on sales of other real estate owned and repossessions	$	(410	)	$	(1,449	)
Valuation write-downs		444			3,373
Operating expenses, net of rental income		1,005			1,954

	$	1,039		$	3,878

NOTE 9: ~~DEPOSITS~~PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT

June 30,
December 31,
2018 2017
(In Thousands)

Time Deposits:
0.00% - 0.99% $ 185,845 $ 254,502
1.00% - 1.99% 728,638 1,006,373
2.00% - 2.99% 465,550 106,888
3.00% - 3.99% 1,983 701
4.00% - 4.99% 1,122 1,108
5.00% and above 273 272
Total time deposits (1.61% - 1.24%) 1,383,411 1,369,844
Non-interest-bearing demand deposits 667,516 661,589
Interest-bearing demand and savings deposits (0.37% - 0.32%) 1,546,130 1,565,711
Total Deposits $ 3,597,057 $ 3,597,144

Major classifications of premises and equipment, stated at cost, were as follows:

	June 30,		December 31,
	2019		2018
	(In Thousands)

Land	$	40,576	$	40,508
Buildings and improvements		95,698		95,039
Furniture, fixtures and equipment		57,682		54,327
Operating leases right of use asset		9,106		—
		203,062		189,874
Less accumulated depreciation		59,589		57,450

	$	143,473	$	132,424

Leases. The Company adopted ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), on January 1, 2019, using the modified retrospective transition approach whereby comparative periods were not restated. The Company also elected certain relief options under the ASU, including the option not to recognize right of use asset and lease liabilities that arise from short-term leases (leases with terms of twelve months or less). The Company has 17 total lease agreements in which it is the lessee, with lease terms exceeding twelve months, substantially all of which are for branch locations and commercial loan production offices. All of our lease agreements where we have offsite ATMs are for terms not exceeding twelve months. Adoption of this ASU resulted in the Company initially recognizing a right of use asset and corresponding lease liability of $9.5 million during the three months ended March 31, 2019. The amount of the right of use asset and corresponding lease liability will fluctuate based on the Company’s lease terminations, new leases and lease modifications and renewals, and were both $9.1 million as of June 30, 2019.

All of our leases are classified as operating leases (as they were prior to January 1, 2019), and therefore were previously not recognized on the Company’s consolidated statements of financial condition. With the adoption of ASU 2016-02, these operating leases are now included as a right of use asset in the premises and equipment line item on the Company’s consolidated statements of financial condition. The corresponding lease liability is included in the accrued expenses and other liabilities line item on the Company’s consolidated statements of financial condition. Because these leases are classified as operating leases, the adoption of the new standard did not have a material effect on lease expense on the Company’s consolidated statements of income.

ASU 2016-02 provides a number of optional practical expedients in transition. The Company has elected the “package of practical expedients,” which permits the Company not to reassess under the new standard the prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct costs. The Company also elected the use of the hindsight, a practical expedient which permits the use of information available after lease inception to determine the lease term via the knowledge of renewal options exercised not available as of the lease’s inception. The practical expedient pertaining to land easements is not applicable to the Company.

ASU 2016-02 also requires certain other accounting elections. The Company elected the short-term lease recognition exemption for all leases that qualify, meaning those with terms under twelve months. Right of use assets or lease liabilities are not to be recognized for short-term leases. The Company also elected the practical expedient to not separate lease and non-lease components for all leases. The Company’s short-term leases related to offsite ATMs have both fixed and variable lease payment components, based on the number of transactions at the various ATMs. The variable portion of these lease payments is not material and the total lease expense related to ATMs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, was $76,000 and $149,000, respectively.

The calculated amounts of the right of use assets and lease liabilities in the table below are impacted by the length of the lease term and the discount rate used to present value the minimum lease payments. The Company’s lease agreements often include one or more options to renew at the Company’s discretion. If at lease inception, the Company considers the exercising of a renewal option to be reasonably certain, the Company will include the extended term in the calculation of the right of use asset and lease liability. Regarding the discount rate, the ASU requires the use of the rate implicit in the lease whenever this rate is readily determinable. As this rate is rarely determinable, the Company utilizes its incremental borrowing rate at lease inception over a similar term. The discount rate utilized was the FHLBank borrowing rate for the term corresponding to the expected term of the lease. The expected lease terms range from 3.3 years to 19.9 years with a weighted-average lease term of 11.1 years. The weighted-average discount rate was 3.40%.

	At or For the		At or For the
	Three Months Ended		Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2019		June 30, 2019
	(In Thousands)
Statement of Financial Condition
Operating leases right of use asset	$	9,106	$	9,106
Operating leases liability	$	9,153	$	9,153

Statement of Income
Operating lease costs classified as occupancy and equipment expense	$	371	$	747
(includes short-term lease costs and amortization of right of use asset)

Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Operating cash flows from operating leases	$	351	$	701
Right of use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations:
Operating leases			$	9,538

For the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, lease expense was $371,000 and $323,000, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, lease expense was $747,000 and $654,000, respectively. At June 30, 2019, future expected lease payments for leases with terms exceeding one year were as follows (in thousands):

2019	$	597
2020		1,132
2021		1,148
2022		1,131
2023		1,082
2024		956
Thereafter		5,026

Future lease payments expected		11,072

Less interest portion of lease payments		(1,919	)

Lease liability	$	9,153

The Company does not sublease any of its leased facilities; however, it does lease to other third parties portions of facilities that it owns. In terms of being the lessor in these circumstances, all of these lease agreements are classified as operating leases. In the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, income recognized from these lessor agreements was $285,000 and $561,000, respectively, and was included in occupancy and equipment expense.

NOTE 10: DEPOSITS

	June 30,		December 31,
	2019		2018
	(In Thousands)

Time Deposits:
0.00% - 0.99%	$	128,479	$	150,656
1.00% - 1.99%		269,123		511,873
2.00% - 2.99%		1,257,086		857,973
3.00% - 3.99%		75,147		69,793
4.00% - 4.99%		1,065		1,116
Total time deposits (2.25% - 1.98%)		1,730,900		1,591,411
Non-interest-bearing demand deposits		667,732		661,061
Interest-bearing demand and savings deposits (0.51% - 0.46%)		1,489,904		1,472,535
Total Deposits	$	3,888,536	$	3,725,007

NOTE ~~10:~~11: ADVANCES FROM FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK

~~Advances~~At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, there were no outstanding term advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines (FHLBank advances) ~~at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 consisted~~. There were overnight borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank of ~~the following:~~Des Moines, which are included below in Note 12.

June 30, 2018 December 31, 2017
Weighted Weighted
Average Average
Interest Interest
Due In Amount Rate Amount Rate
(In Thousands) (In Thousands)

2018 $ 259,000 2.06 % $ 127,500 1.53 %

NOTE ~~11:~~12: SECURITIES SOLD UNDER REVERSE REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS AND SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS

	June 30, 2018		December 31, 2017		June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
	(In Thousands)				(In Thousands)

Notes payable – Community Development Equity Funds	$	1,360	$	1,604	$	1,316	$	1,625
Other interest-bearing liabilities						30,820		13,100
Overnight borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank		—		15,000		136,500		178,000
Securities sold under reverse repurchase agreements		95,543		80,531		98,632		105,253

	$	96,903	$	97,135	$	267,268	$	297,978

The Bank enters into sales of securities under agreements to repurchase (reverse repurchase agreements). Reverse repurchase agreements are treated as financings, and the obligations to repurchase securities sold are reflected as a liability in the statements of financial condition. The dollar amount of securities underlying the agreements remains in the asset accounts. Securities underlying the agreements are being held by the Bank during the agreement period. All agreements are written on a term of ~~one-month~~one month or less.

At both June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, other interest-bearing liabilities consisted of cash collateral held by the Company to satisfy minimum collateral posting thresholds with its derivative dealer counterparties representing the termination value of derivatives, which at such time were in a net asset position. Under the collateral agreements between the parties, either party may choose to provide cash or securities to satisfy its collateral requirements.

The following table represents the ~~Company's~~Company’s securities sold under reverse repurchase agreements, by collateral type and remaining contractual maturity.

	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
	Overnight and		Overnight and
	Continuous		Continuous
	(In Thousands)

Mortgage-backed securities – GNMA, FNMA, FHLMC	$	98,632	$	105,253

June 30,
2018

December 31,
2017

Overnight and Overnight and
Continuous Continuous
(In Thousands)

Mortgage-backed securities – GNMA, FNMA, FHLMC $ 95,543 $ 80,531

NOTE ~~12:~~13: SUBORDINATED NOTES

On August 8, 2016, the Company completed the public offering and sale of $75.0 million of its subordinated notes. The notes are due August 15, 2026, and have a fixed interest rate of 5.25% until August 15, 2021, at which time the rate becomes floating at a rate equal to three-month LIBOR plus 4.087%. The Company may call the notes at par beginning on August 15, 2021, and on any scheduled interest payment date thereafter. The notes were sold at par, resulting in net proceeds, after underwriting discounts and commissions, legal, accounting and other professional fees, of approximately $73.5 million. Total debt issuance costs ~~totaling~~of approximately $1.5 million were deferred and are being amortized over the expected life of the notes, which is 10five years. Amortization of the debt issuance costs during the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, ~~and 2017,~~ totaled ~~$38,000~~$108,000 and $38,000, respectively, and is included in interest expense on subordinated notes in the consolidated statements of income, resulting in an imputed interest rate of ~~5.47%~~5.91%. Amortization of the debt issuance costs during the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, totaled $217,000 and ~~2017, totaled~~ $78,000, respectively, and ~~$76,000, respectively,~~is included in interest expense on subordinated notes in the consolidated statements of income, resulting in an imputed interest rate of 5.91%.

At June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, subordinated notes are summarized as follows:

	June 30, 2018		December 31, 2017		June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
	(In Thousands)				(In Thousands)

Subordinated notes	$	75,000	$	75,000	$	75,000	$	75,000
Less: unamortized debt issuance costs		1,234		1,312		941		1,158
	$	73,766	$	73,688	$	74,059	$	73,842

NOTE ~~13:~~14: INCOME TAXES

Reconciliations of the ~~Company's~~Company’s effective tax rates to the statutory corporate tax rates were as follows:

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Three Months Ended June 30,
	2018			2017			2019			2018

Tax at statutory rate		21.0	%		35.0	%		21.0	%		21.0	%
Nontaxable interest and dividends		(0.8	)		(1.2	)		(0.5	)		(0.8	)
Tax credits		(3.6	)		(4.3	)		(4.2	)		(3.6	)
State taxes		1.2			1.8			1.2			1.2
Other		(0.1	)		(0.5	)		(0.7	)		(0.1	)
								16.8	%		17.7	%
		17.7	%		30.8	%

	Six Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2018			2017			2019			2018

Tax at statutory rate		21.0	%		35.0	%		21.0	%		21.0	%
Nontaxable interest and dividends		(0.9	)		(1.5	)		(0.5	)		(0.9	)
Tax credits		(4.0	)		(5.1	)		(4.4	)		(4.0	)
State taxes		1.2			1.5			1.3			1.2
Other		(0.3	)		(1.0	)		0.3			(0.3	)
								17.7	%		17.0	%
		17.0	%		28.9	%

~~H.R. 1, originally known as the~~The Tax ~~Cuts and Jobs~~ Act ~~("Tax Act")~~ was signed into law on December 22, 2017, making several changes to U. S. corporate income tax laws, including reducing the corporate Federal income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2018. U. S. GAAP requires that the impact of the provisions of the Tax Act be accounted for in the period of ~~enactment and the~~enactment. The Company recognized the income tax effects of the Tax Act in its 2017 financial statements. The Tax Act is complex and ~~requires~~required significant detailed analysis. During the preparation of the ~~Company's~~Company’s 2017 income tax returns in 2018, no additional adjustments related to enactment of the Tax Act ~~may be~~were identified. We do not currently expect significant adjustments will be necessary, but any further adjustments identified will be recognized in accordance with guidance contained in Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 from the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Company and its consolidated subsidiaries have not been audited recently by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and, as such, tax years through December 31, 2005, have been closed without audit. The Company, through one of its subsidiaries, is a partner in two partnerships which have been under Internal Revenue Service examination for 2006 and 2007. As a result, the ~~Company's~~Company’s 2006 and subsequent tax years remain open for examination. The examinations of these partnerships advanced during 2016, 2017, and ~~2017.~~2018. One of the partnerships has advanced to Tax Court and has entered a Motion for Entry of Decision with an agreed upon settlement. The other partnership examination was recently completed by the IRS with no change impacting the ~~Company's~~Company’s tax positions. The Company does not currently expect significant adjustments to its financial statements from the partnership matter at the Tax Court.

The Company ~~was previously~~is currently under State of Missouri income and franchise tax examinations for its 2014 through 2015 tax years. The Company disagreed with the proposed results of these examinations. As a result, the Company has filed a protest with the state outlining its tax position and support under Missouri law. Therefore, the Company does not currently expect significant adjustments to its financial statements from this state examination. ~~During 2017, the Company settled an appeal with the Kansas Department of Revenue. The settlement did not result in any significant adjustments to the Company's financial statements.~~

3634

NOTE ~~14:~~15: DISCLOSURES ABOUT FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements, defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Topic 820 also specifies a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1): Inputs that are quoted unadjusted prices in active markets for identical assets that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date. An active market for the asset is a market in which transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

·•

Other observable inputs (Level 2): Inputs that reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity including quoted prices for similar assets, quoted prices for securities in inactive markets and inputs derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

·	Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3): Inputs that reflect assumptions of a source independent of the reporting entity or the reporting entity's own assumptions that are supported by little or no market activity or observable inputs.

Financial instruments are broken down as follows by recurring or nonrecurring measurement status. Recurring assets are initially measured at fair value and are required to be remeasured at fair value in the financial statements at each reporting date. Assets measured on a nonrecurring basis are assets that, due to an event or circumstance, were required to be remeasured at fair value after initial recognition in the financial statements at some time during the reporting period.

The Company considers transfers between the levels of the hierarchy to be recognized at the end of related reporting periods. From December 31, ~~2017~~2018 to June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, no assets for which fair value is measured on a recurring basis transferred between any levels of the hierarchy.

3735

Recurring Measurements

The following table presents the fair value measurements of assets recognized in the accompanying statements of financial condition measured at fair value on a recurring basis and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fell at June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017:~~2018:

				Fair value measurements using										Fair value measurements using
				Quoted prices										Quoted prices
				in active										in active
				markets		Other			Significant					markets		Other			Significant
				for identical		observable			unobservable					for identical		observable			unobservable
				assets		inputs			inputs					assets		inputs			inputs
	Fair value			(Level 1)		(Level 2)			(Level 3)		Fair value			(Level 1)		(Level 2)			(Level 3)
	(In Thousands)										(In Thousands)

June 30, 2018
Mortgage-backed securities	$	116,365		$	—	$	116,365		$	—
June 30, 2019
Agency mortgage-backed securities											$	191,577		$	—	$	191,577		$	—
Agency collateralized mortgage obligations												71,807			—		71,807			—
States and political subdivisions		53,606			—		53,606			—		42,265			—		42,265			—
Interest rate derivative asset		1,273			—		1,273			—		31,855			—		31,855			—
Interest rate derivative liability		(1,273	)		—		(1,273	)		—		(1,281	)		—		(1,281	)		—

December 31, 2017
Mortgage-backed securities	$	122,533		$	—	$	122,533		$	—
December 31, 2018
Agency mortgage-backed securities											$	153,258		$	—	$	153,258		$	—
Agency collateralized mortgage obligations												39,260			—		39,260			—
States and political subdivisions		56,646			—		56,646			—		51,450			—		51,450			—
Interest rate derivative asset		981			—		981			—		12,800			—		12,800			—
Interest rate derivative liability		(1,030	)		—		(1,030	)		—		(716	)		—		(716	)		—

The following is a description of inputs and valuation methodologies used for assets recorded at fair value on a recurring basis and recognized in the accompanying statements of financial condition at June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, as well as the general classification of such assets pursuant to the valuation hierarchy. There have been no significant changes in the valuation techniques during the six-month period ended June 30, ~~2018.~~2019. For assets classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, the process used to develop the reported fair value is described below.

Available-for-Sale Securities. Investment securities available for sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. The fair values used by the Company are obtained from an independent pricing service, which represent either quoted market prices for the identical asset or fair values determined by pricing models, or other model-based valuation techniques, that consider observable market data, such as interest rate volatilities, LIBOR yield curve, credit spreads and prices from market makers and live trading systems. Recurring Level 2 securities include U.S. government agency securities, mortgage-backed securities, state and municipal bonds and certain other investments. Inputs used for valuing Level 2 securities include observable data that may include dealer quotes, benchmark yields, market spreads, live trading levels and market consensus prepayment speeds, among other things. Additional inputs include indicative values derived from the independent pricing ~~service's~~service’s proprietary computerized models. There were no recurring Level 3 securities at June 30, ~~2018~~2019 or December 31, ~~2017.~~2018.

Interest Rate Derivatives. The fair value is estimated using forward-looking interest rate curves and is determined using observable market rates and, therefore, are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.

Nonrecurring Measurements

The following tables present the fair value measurements of assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall at June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017:~~2018:

Fair Value Measurements Using
Quoted prices
in active
markets Other Significant
for identical observable unobservable
assets inputs inputs
Fair value (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)
(In Thousands)

June 30, 2018

Impaired loans $ 5,450 $ — $ — $ 5,450

Foreclosed assets held for sale $ 3,662 $ — $ — $ 3,662

December 31, 2017

Impaired loans $ 1,590 $ — $ — $ 1,590

Foreclosed assets held for sale $ 1,758 $ — $ — $ 1,758

			Fair Value Measurements Using
			Quoted prices
			in active
			markets		Other		Significant
			for identical		observable		unobservable
			assets		inputs		inputs
	Fair value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
	(In Thousands)

June 30, 2019
Impaired loans	$	733	$	—	$	—	$	733

Foreclosed assets held for sale	$	851	$	—	$	—	$	851

December 31, 2018
Impaired loans	$	2,805	$	—	$	—	$	2,805

Foreclosed assets held for sale	$	1,776	$	—	$	—	$	1,776

The following is a description of valuation methodologies used for assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and recognized in the accompanying statements of financial condition, as well as the general classification of such assets pursuant to the valuation hierarchy. For assets classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, the process used to develop the reported fair value is described below.

Loans Held for Sale. Mortgage loans held for sale are recorded at the lower of carrying value or fair value. The fair value of mortgage loans held for sale is based on what secondary markets are currently offering for portfolios with similar characteristics. As such, the Company classifies mortgage loans held for sale as Nonrecurring Level 2. Write-downs to fair value typically do not occur as the Company generally enters into commitments to sell individual mortgage loans at the time the loan is originated to reduce market risk. The Company typically does not have commercial loans held for sale. At June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, the aggregate fair value of mortgage loans held for sale exceeded their cost. Accordingly, no mortgage loans held for sale were marked down and reported at fair value.

Impaired Loans. A loan is considered to be impaired when it is probable that all of the principal and interest due may not be collected according to its contractual terms. Generally, when a loan is considered impaired, the amount of reserve required under FASB ASC 310, Receivables, is measured based on the fair value of the underlying collateral. The Company makes such measurements on all material loans deemed impaired using the fair value of the collateral for collateral dependent loans. The fair value of collateral used by the Company is determined by obtaining an observable market price or by obtaining an appraised value from an independent, licensed or certified appraiser, using observable market data. This data includes information such as ~~selling prices of similar properties~~property sales comparisons and capitalization rates of similar properties sold within the market, expected future cash flows or earnings of the subject property based on current market expectations, and other relevant factors. All appraised values are adjusted for market-related trends based on the ~~Company's~~Company’s experience in sales and other appraisals of similar property types as well as estimated selling costs. Each quarter management reviews all collateral dependent impaired loans on a loan-by-loan basis to determine whether updated appraisals are necessary based on loan performance, collateral type and guarantor support. At times, the Company measures the fair value of collateral dependent impaired loans using appraisals with dates prior to one year from the date of review. These appraisals are discounted by applying current, observable market data about similar property types such as sales contracts, estimations of value by individuals familiar with the market, other appraisals, sales or collateral assessments based on current market activity until

updated appraisals are obtained. Depending on the length of time since an appraisal was performed and the data provided through our reviews, these appraisals are typically discounted 10-40%. The policy described above is the same for all types of collateral dependent impaired ~~loans.~~loans secured by real estate.

The Company records impaired loans as Nonrecurring Level 3. If a ~~loan's~~loan’s fair value as estimated by the Company is less than its carrying value, the Company either records a charge-off of the portion of the loan that exceeds the fair value or establishes a reserve within the allowance for loan losses specific to the loan. Loans for which such charge-offs or reserves were recorded during the six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 or the year ended December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, are shown in the table above (net of reserves).

Foreclosed Assets Held for Sale. Foreclosed assets held for sale are initially recorded at fair value less estimated cost to sell at the date of foreclosure. Subsequent to foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management and the assets are carried at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less estimated cost to sell. Foreclosed assets held for sale are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The foreclosed assets represented in the table above have been re-measured during the six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 or the year ended December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, subsequent to their initial transfer to foreclosed assets.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following methods were used to estimate the fair value of all other financial instruments recognized in the accompanying statements of financial condition at amounts other than fair value.

Cash and Cash Equivalents and Federal Home Loan Bank Stock. The carrying amount approximates fair value.

Loans and Interest Receivable. ~~For June 30, 2018, the~~The fair value of loans is estimated on an exit price basis incorporating contractual cash ~~flow,~~flows, prepayments, discount spreads, credit ~~loss~~losses and liquidity premiums. For December 31, 2017, the fair value of loans was estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities. Loans with similar characteristics were aggregated for purposes of the calculations. The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable approximates its fair value.

Deposits and Accrued Interest Payable. The fair value of demand deposits and savings accounts is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date, i.e., their carrying amounts. ~~For June 30, 2018, the~~The fair value of fixed maturity certificates of deposit is estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation using the average advances yield curve from 11 districts of the FHLB for the as of date. ~~For December 31, 2017, the discounted cash flow calculation applied the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.~~ The carrying amount of accrued interest payable approximates its fair value.

~~Federal Home Loan Bank Advances.~~ ~~Rates currently available to the Company for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities are used to estimate the fair value of advances.~~

Short-Term Borrowings. The carrying amount approximates fair value.

Subordinated Debentures Issued to Capital Trusts. The subordinated debentures have floating rates that reset quarterly. The carrying amount of these debentures approximates their fair value.

Subordinated Notes. The fair values used by the Company are obtained from independent sources and are derived from quoted market prices of the ~~Company's~~Company’s subordinated notes and quoted market prices of other subordinated debt instruments with similar characteristics.

Commitments to Originate Loans, Letters of Credit and Lines of Credit. The fair value of commitments is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties. For fixed rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates. The fair value of letters of credit is based on fees currently charged for similar agreements or on the estimated cost to terminate them or otherwise settle the obligations with the counterparties at the reporting date.

The following table presents estimated fair values of the ~~Company's~~Company’s financial instruments not recorded at fair value on the statements of financial condition. The fair values of certain of these instruments were calculated by discounting expected cash flows, which method involves significant judgments by management and uncertainties. Fair value is the estimated amount at which financial assets or liabilities could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. Because no market exists for certain of these financial instruments and because management does not intend to sell these financial instruments, the Company does not know whether the fair values shown below represent values at which the respective financial instruments could be sold individually or in the aggregate.

June 30, 2018 December 31, 2017
Carrying Fair Hierarchy Carrying Fair Hierarchy
Amount Value Level Amount Value Level
(In Thousands)

Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents $ 280,485 $ 280,485 1 $ 242,253 $ 242,253 1
Held-to-maturity securities — — 2 130 131 2
Mortgage loans held for sale 5,087 5,087 2 8,203 8,203 2
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses 3,859,801 3,829,589 3 3,726,302 3,735,216 3
Accrued interest receivable 12,449 12,449 3 12,338 12,338 3
Investment in FHLBank stock 15,678 15,678 3 11,182 11,182 3

Financial liabilities
Deposits 3,597,057 3,587,494 3 3,597,144 3,606,400 3
FHLBank advances 259,000 259,000 3 127,500 127,500 3
Short-term borrowings 96,903 96,903 3 97,135 97,135 3
Subordinated debentures 25,774 25,774 3 25,774 25,774 3
Subordinated notes 73,766 75,563 2 73,688 76,500 2
Accrued interest payable 3,394 3,394 3 2,904 2,904 3

Unrecognized financial instruments (net of
contractual value)
Commitments to originate loans — — 3 — — 3
Letters of credit 179 179 3 85 85 3
Lines of credit — — 3 — — 3

4138

	June 30, 2019						December 31, 2018
	Carrying		Fair		Hierarchy		Carrying		Fair		Hierarchy
	Amount		Value		Level		Amount		Value		Level
	(In Thousands)

Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	181,372	$	181,372		1	$	202,742	$	202,742		1
Mortgage loans held for sale		11,106		11,106		2		1,650		1,650		2
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses		4,112,455		4,101,133		3		3,989,001		3,955,786		3
Accrued interest receivable		14,351		14,351		3		13,448		13,448		3
Investment in FHLBank stock		11,093		11,093		3		12,438		12,438		3

Financial liabilities
Deposits		3,888,536		3,890,877		3		3,725,007		3,717,899		3
Short-term borrowings		267,268		267,268		3		297,978		297,978		3
Subordinated debentures		25,774		25,774		3		25,774		25,774		3
Subordinated notes		74,059		76,125		2		73,842		75,188		2
Accrued interest payable		4,209		4,209		3		3,570		3,570		3

Unrecognized financial instruments (net of contractual value)
Commitments to originate loans		—		—		3		—		—		3
Letters of credit		126		126		3		146		146		3
Lines of credit		—		—		3		—		—		3

NOTE ~~15:~~16: DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES

Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives

The Company is exposed to certain risks arising from both its business operations and economic conditions. The Company principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business and operational risks through management of its core business activities. The Company manages economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity and credit risk, primarily by managing the amount, sources and duration of its assets and liabilities. In the normal course of business, the Company may use derivative financial instruments (primarily interest rate swaps) from time to time to assist in its interest rate risk management. The Company has interest rate derivatives that result from a service provided to certain qualifying loan customers that are not used to manage interest rate risk in the ~~Company's~~Company’s assets or liabilities and are not designated in a qualifying hedging relationship. The Company manages a matched book with respect to its derivative instruments in order to minimize its net risk exposure resulting from such transactions. In addition, the Company has interest rate derivatives that are designated in a qualified hedging relationship.

Nondesignated Hedges

The Company has interest rate swaps that are not designated as qualifying hedging relationships. Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and result from a service the Company provides to certain loan customers, which the Company began offering during 2011. The Company executes interest rate swaps with commercial banking customers to facilitate their respective risk management strategies. Those interest rate swaps are simultaneously hedged by offsetting interest rate swaps that the Company executes with a third party, such that the Company minimizes its net risk exposure resulting from such transactions. As the interest rate swaps associated with this program do not meet the strict hedge accounting requirements, changes in the fair value of both the customer swaps and the offsetting swaps are recognized directly in earnings.

As part of the Valley Bank FDIC-assisted acquisition, the Company acquired seven loans with related interest rate swaps. ~~Valley's~~Valley’s swap program differed from the ~~Company's~~Company’s in that Valley did not have back to back swaps with the customer and a counterparty. ~~Three~~Five of the seven acquired loans with interest rate swaps have paid off. The aggregate notional amount of the ~~four~~two remaining Valley swaps was ~~$2.3 million~~$736,000 at June 30, ~~2018.~~2019. At June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, excluding the Valley Bank swaps, the Company had 2118 interest rate swaps totaling ~~$88.9~~$69.6 million in notional amount with commercial customers, and 2118 interest rate swaps with the same aggregate notional amount with third parties related to its program. In addition, the Company has ~~two~~three participation loans purchased totaling ~~$21.6~~$30.7 million, in which the lead institution has an interest rate swap with ~~their~~its customer and the economics of the counterparty swap are passed along to usthe Company through the loan participation. ~~As of~~At December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, excluding the Valley Bank swaps, the Company had 2218 interest rate swaps totaling ~~$92.7~~$78.5 million in notional amount with commercial customers, and 2218 interest rate swaps with the same aggregate notional amount with third parties related to its program. During the three months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, the Company recognized net gains (losses) of ~~$11,000~~$(44,000) and ~~net losses of $20,000,~~$11,000, respectively, in noninterest income related to changes in the fair value of these swaps. During the six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, the Company recognized net gains (losses) of ~~$48,000~~$(68,000) and ~~net losses of $13,000,~~$48,000, respectively, in noninterest income related to changes in the fair value of these swaps.

Cash Flow Hedges

Interest Rate Swap.As a strategy to maintain acceptable levels of exposure to the risk of changes in future cash flows due to interest rate fluctuations, in October 2018, the Company entered into ~~two~~an interest rate ~~cap agreements for a portion~~swap transaction as part of its ongoing interest rate management strategies to hedge the risk of its floating rate ~~debt associated~~loans. The notional amount of the swap is $400 million with ~~its trust preferred securities. One agreement terminated~~a termination date of October 6, 2025. Under the terms of the swap, the Company receives a fixed rate of interest of 3.018% and pays a floating rate of interest equal to one-month USD-LIBOR. The floating rate resets monthly and net settlements of interest due to/from the counterparty also occur monthly. The floating rate of interest was 2.4185% as of June 30, 2019. Therefore, in ~~2015~~the near term, the Company will receive net interest settlements which will be recorded as loan interest income, to the extent that the fixed rate of interest continues to exceed one-month USD-LIBOR. If one-month USD-LIBOR exceeds the fixed rate of interest in future periods, the Company will be required to pay net settlements to the counterparty and ~~one agreement terminated in 2017.~~ will record those net payments as a reduction of interest income on loans. The Company recorded interest income related to this swap transaction of $568,000 and $1.1 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, respectively. The effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative ~~was~~is reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affected earnings. ~~No gains~~Gains and losses ~~related to changes in~~on the ~~fair value were~~derivative representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in current ~~earnings during the three or six months ended June 30, 2018.~~earnings. During both the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, the Company recognized ~~$96,000 and $183,000, respectively,~~$-0- in ~~interest expense~~noninterest income related to changes in the ~~amortization~~fair value of ~~the cost of the interest rate caps.~~this derivative.

4240

The table below presents the fair value of the ~~Company's~~Company’s derivative financial instruments as well as their classification on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition:

	Location in	Fair Value
	Consolidated Statements	June 30,		December 31,
	of Financial Condition	2019		2018
		(In Thousands)
Derivatives designated as
hedging instruments
Interest rate swap	Prepaid expenses and other assets	$	30,665	$	12,106

Total derivatives designated
as hedging instruments		$	30,665	$	12,106

Derivatives not designated
as hedging instruments

Asset Derivatives
Interest rate products	Prepaid expenses and other assets	$	1,190	$	694

Total derivatives not designated
as hedging instruments		$	1,190	$	694

Liability Derivatives
Interest rate products	Accrued expenses and other liabilities	$	1,281	$	716

Total derivatives not designated
as hedging instruments		$	1,281	$	716

Location in Fair Value
Consolidated Statements June 30, December 31,
of Financial Condition 2018 2017
   (In Thousands)
Derivatives not designated
  as hedging instruments

Asset Derivatives
Interest rate products Prepaid expenses and other assets $ 1,273 $ 981

Total derivatives not designated
  as hedging instruments $ 1,273 $ 981

Liability Derivatives
Interest rate products Accrued expenses and other liabilities $ 1,273 $ 1,030

Total derivatives not designated
as hedging instruments $ 1,273 $ 1,030

The following table presents the effect of ~~derivative instruments~~cash flow hedge accounting on the statements of comprehensive ~~income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017:~~income:

	Amount of Gain (Loss)
	Recognized in AOCI
	Three Months Ended June 30,
Cash Flow Hedges	2019		2018
	(In Thousands)

Interest rate swap, net of income taxes	$	8,528	$	—

	Amount of Gain (Loss)
	Recognized in AOCI
	Six Months Ended June 30,
Cash Flow Hedges	2019		2018
	(In Thousands)

Interest rate swap, net of income taxes	$	14,328	$	—

Amount of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in AOCI
Three Months Ended June 30,
Cash Flow Hedges 2018 2017
(In Thousands)

Interest rate cap, net of income taxes $ — $ 46

Amount of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in AOCI
Six Months Ended June 30,
Cash Flow Hedges 2018 2017
(In Thousands)

Interest rate cap, net of income taxes $ — $ 97

The following table presents the effect of cash flow hedge accounting on the statements of operations:

	Three Months Ended June 30,
Cash Flow Hedges	2019				2018

	Interest Income		Interest Expense		Interest Income		Interest Expense
	(In Thousands)

Interest rate swap	$	568	$	—	$	—	$	—

	Six Months Ended June 30,
Cash Flow Hedges	2019				2018

	Interest Income		Interest Expense		Interest Income		Interest Expense
	(In Thousands)

Interest rate swap	$	1,081	$	—	$	—	$	—

Agreements with Derivative Counterparties

The Company has agreements with its derivative counterparties. If the Company defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then the Company could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations. If the Bank fails to maintain its status as a well-capitalized institution, then the counterparty could terminate the derivative positions and the Company would be required to settle its obligations under the agreements. Similarly, the Company could be required to settle its obligations under certain of its agreements if certain regulatory events ~~occurred,~~occur, such as the issuance of a formal directive, or if the ~~Company's~~Company’s credit rating is downgraded below a specified level.

As of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the termination value of derivatives with our derivative dealer counterparties (related to loan level swaps with commercial lending customers) in a net liability position, which included accrued interest but excluded any adjustment for nonperformance risk, related to these agreements was $1.1 million. In addition, as of June 30, 2019, the termination value of derivatives with our derivative dealer counterparty (related to the balance sheet hedge commenced in October 2018) in a net asset position, which included accrued interest but excluded any adjustment for nonperformance risk, related to these agreements was ~~$1.3~~$30.7 million. The Company has minimum collateral posting thresholds with its derivative dealer counterparties. At June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the ~~Company's~~Company’s activity with one of its derivative counterparties ~~had not~~ met the level at which the minimum collateral posting thresholds take effect (collateral to be received by the Company) and the derivative counterparties had posted collateral of $30.8 million to the Company to satisfy the balance sheet hedge. Additionally, the Company’s activity with one of its derivative counterparties met the level at which the minimum collateral posting thresholds take effect (collateral to be given by the Company) and the Company had ~~not~~ posted ~~any~~ collateral of $686,000 to ~~its~~the derivative ~~counterparties.~~counterparties to satisfy the loan level agreements. As of December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, the termination value of derivatives with our derivative dealer counterparties (related to loan level swaps with commercial lending customers) in a net ~~liability~~asset position, which included accrued interest but excluded any adjustment for nonperformance risk, related to these agreements was ~~$336,000.~~$396,000. In addition, as of December 31, 2018, the termination value of derivatives with our derivative dealer counterparty (related to the balance sheet hedge commenced in October 2018) in a net asset position, which included accrued interest but excluded any adjustment for nonperformance risk, related to these agreements was $12.3 million. The Company has minimum collateral posting thresholds with its derivative dealer counterparties. At December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, the ~~Company's~~Company’s activity

with certain of its derivative counterparties met the level at which the minimum collateral posting thresholds take effect (collateral to be received by the Company) and the ~~Company~~derivative counterparties had posted ~~$809,000~~collateral of ~~collateral~~$704,000 to the Company to satisfy the ~~agreements. If~~loan level agreements and collateral of $12.8 million to the Company ~~had breached any of these provisions at June 30, 2018 or December 31, 2017, it could have been required~~ to ~~settle its obligations under~~satisfy the ~~agreements at the termination value.~~balance sheet hedge.

~~NOTE 16: SUBSEQUENT EVENT – SALE OF CERTAIN BRANCHES~~

On July 20, 2018, the Company closed on the sale of four banking centers and related deposits in the Omaha, Neb., metropolitan market to Lincoln, Neb.-based West Gate Bank. Pursuant to the purchase and assumption agreement, the Bank sold branch deposits of approximately $56 million and sold substantially all branch-related real estate, fixed assets and ATMs. The Company recorded a pre-tax gain (excluding expenses related to the sale) of approximately $7.4 million on the sale based on the contractual deposit premium and the sales price of the branch assets. The Company estimates that the gain will increase earnings approximately $0.38 (after tax) per diluted share, in the three months ending September 30, 2018.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward-looking Statements

When used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and other documents filed or furnished by ~~the Company~~Great Southern Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), in the Company's press releases or other public or stockholder communications, and in oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer, the words or phrases "will likely result," "are expected to," "will continue," "is anticipated," "estimate," "project," "intends" or similar expressions are intended to identify "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including, among other things, (i) the possibility that the amounts of any pre-tax gain and the changes in non-interest income, non-interest expense and interest expense actually resulting from the Bank's recently completed transaction with West Gate Bank might be materially different from estimated amounts; (ii) the possibility that the actual reduction in the Company's effective tax rate expected to result from H. R. 1, formerly known as the "Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" (the "Tax Reform Legislation") might be different from the reduction estimated by the Company; (iii) expected revenues, cost savings, earnings accretion, synergies and other benefits from the Company's merger and acquisition activities might not be realized within the anticipated time frames or at all, and costs or difficulties relating to integration matters, including but not limited to customer and employee retention, might be greater than expected; ~~(iv)~~(ii) changes in economic conditions, either nationally or in the Company's market areas; ~~(v)~~(iii) fluctuations in interest rates; ~~(vi)~~(iv) the risks of lending and investing activities, including changes in the level and direction of loan delinquencies and write-offs and changes in estimates of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses; ~~(vii)~~(v) the possibility of other-than-temporary impairments of securities held in the Company's securities portfolio; ~~(viii)~~(vi) the Company's ability to access cost-effective funding; ~~(ix)~~(vii) fluctuations in real estate values and both residential and commercial real estate market conditions; ~~(x)~~(viii) demand for loans and deposits in the Company's market areas; ~~(xi)~~(ix) the ability to adapt successfully to technological changes to meet customers' needs and developments in the marketplace; ~~(xii)~~(x) the possibility that security measures implemented might not be sufficient to mitigate the risk of a cyber attack or cyber theft, and that such security measures might not protect against systems failures or interruptions; ~~(xiii)~~(xi) legislative or regulatory changes that adversely affect the Company's business, including, without limitation, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and its implementing regulations, the overdraft protection regulations and customers' responses thereto and the Tax Reform Legislation; ~~(xiv)~~(xii) changes in accounting principles, policies or guidelines; ~~(xv)~~(xiii) monetary and fiscal policies of the Federal Reserve Board and the U.S. Government and other governmental initiatives affecting the financial services industry; ~~(xvi)~~(xiv) results of examinations of the Company and ~~the~~Great Southern Bank by their regulators, including the possibility that the regulators may, among other things, require the Company to limit its business activities, ~~changes~~change its business mix, increase its allowance for loan losses, write-down assets or increase its capital levels, or affect its ability to borrow funds or maintain or increase deposits, which could adversely affect its liquidity and earnings; ~~(xvii)~~(xv) costs and effects of litigation, including settlements and judgments; and ~~(xviii)~~(xvi) competition. The Company wishes to advise readers that the factors listed above and other risks described from time to time in documents filed or furnished by the Company with the SEC could affect the Company's financial performance and could cause the Company's actual results for future periods to differ materially from any opinions or statements expressed with respect to future periods in any current statements.

The Company does not undertake -and specifically declines any obligation- to publicly release the result of any revisions which may be made to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.

Critical Accounting Policies, Judgments and Estimates

The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and general practices within the financial services industry. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

4543

Allowance for Loan Losses and Valuation of Foreclosed Assets

The Company believes that the determination of the allowance for loan losses involves a higher degree of judgment and complexity than its other significant accounting policies. The allowance for loan losses is calculated with the objective of maintaining an allowance level believed by management to be sufficient to absorb estimated loan losses. Management's determination of the adequacy of the allowance is based on periodic evaluations of the loan portfolio and other relevant factors. However, this evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates of, among other things, expected default probabilities, loss once loans default, expected commitment usage, the amounts and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired loans, value of collateral, estimated losses, and general amounts for historical loss experience.

The process also considers economic conditions, uncertainties in estimating losses and inherent risks in the loan portfolio. All of these factors may be susceptible to significant change. To the extent actual outcomes differ from management estimates, additional provisions for loan losses may be required, which would adversely impact ~~earnings in future periods.~~earnings. In addition, the ~~Bank's~~Bank’s regulators could require additional provisions for loan losses as part of their examination process.

See Note 6 ~~"Loans~~“Loans and Allowance for Loan ~~Losses"~~Losses” included in Item 1 for additional information regarding the allowance for loan losses. Inherent in this process is the evaluation of individual significant credit relationships. From time to time certain credit relationships may deteriorate due to payment performance, cash flow of the borrower, value of the collateral, or other factors. In these instances, management may revise its loss estimates and assumptions for these specific credits due to changing circumstances. In some cases, additional losses may be realized; in other instances, the factors that led to the deterioration may improve or the credit may be refinanced elsewhere and allocated allowances may be released from the particular credit. No significant changes were made to management's overall methodology for evaluating the allowance for loan losses during the periods presented in the financial statements of this report.

In the three months ending March 31, 2020, the Company will adopt ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326), which requires an entity to reflect its current estimate of all expected future credit losses. The Company previously formed a cross-functional committee to oversee the system, data, reporting and other considerations for purposes of meeting the requirements of this standard. Data and system needs were assessed. As a result, third-party software was acquired and implemented to manage the data. We have completed the upload of the necessary historical loan data to the software that will be used in meeting certain requirements of this standard. Our loss data covers multiple credit cycles back to 2003. Parallel testing of the new methodology compared to the current methodology has been performed throughout 2019 and the Company continues to evaluate the impact of adopting the new guidance. The Company engaged a third party to perform validation of the accuracy of inputs into the model. This review is currently in process. The Company expects to recognize a one-time cumulative effect adjustment to the allowance for loan losses upon adoption, but cannot yet determine the exact amount of any such one-time adjustment, or the overall impact of the new guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Based on the current modeling results, we anticipate that the one-time cumulative effect adjustment will be less than five percent of total stockholders’ equity.

In addition, the Company considers that the determination of the valuations of foreclosed assets held for sale involves a high degree of judgment and complexity. The carrying value of foreclosed assets reflects ~~management's~~management’s best estimate of the amount to be realized from the sales of the assets. While the estimate is generally based on a valuation by an independent appraiser or recent sales of similar properties, the amount that the Company realizes from the sales of the assets could differ materially from the carrying value reflected in the financial statements, resulting in losses that could adversely impact earnings in future periods.

Carrying Value of Loans Acquired in FDIC-assisted Transactions

The Company considers that the determination of the carrying value of loans acquired in the FDIC-assisted transactions involves a high degree of judgment and complexity. The carrying value of the acquired loans ~~reflect management's~~reflects management’s best ongoing estimates of the amounts to be realized on each of these assets. The Company has now terminated all loss sharing agreements with the FDIC and, accordingly, no longer has an indemnification asset. The Company determined initial fair value accounting estimates of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities in

accordance with FASB ASC 805, Business Combinations. However, the amount that the Company realizes on ~~these~~its acquired loan assets could differ materially from the carrying value reflected in its financial statements, based upon the timing of collections on the acquired loans in future periods. Subsequent to the initial valuation, the Company continues to monitor identified loan pools for changes in estimated cash flows projected for the loan pools, anticipated credit losses and changes in the accretable yield. Analysis of these variables requires significant estimates and a high degree of judgment. See Note 7 ~~"FDIC-Acquired Loans"~~“FDIC-Acquired Loans” included in Item 1 for additional information regarding the TeamBank, Vantus Bank, Sun Security Bank, InterBank and Valley Bank FDIC-assisted transactions.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill and intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives are subject to an impairment test at least annually and more frequently if circumstances indicate their value may not be recoverable. Goodwill is tested for impairment using a process that estimates the fair value of each of the ~~Company's~~Company’s reporting units compared with its carrying value. The Company defines reporting units as a level below each of its operating segments for which there is discrete financial information that is regularly reviewed. As of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the Company had one reporting unit to

which goodwill has been allocated – the Bank. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, then no impairment is recorded. If the carrying value ~~amount~~ exceeds the fair value of a reporting unit, further testing is completed comparing the implied fair value of the reporting ~~unit's~~unit’s goodwill to its carrying value to measure the amount of impairment. Intangible assets that are not amortized ~~will~~must be tested for impairment at least annually by comparing the fair values of those assets to their carrying values. At June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, goodwill consisted of $5.4 million at the Bank reporting unit, which included goodwill of $4.2 million that was recorded during 2016 related to the acquisition of 12 branches from Fifth Third Bank. Other identifiable intangible assets that are subject to amortization are amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of seven years. At June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the amortizable intangible assets consisted of core deposit intangibles of ~~$4.6~~$3.3 million, which are ~~described~~reflected in the table below. These amortizable intangible assets are reviewed for impairment if circumstances indicate their value may not be recoverable based on a comparison of fair value.

While the Company believes no impairment of its goodwill or other intangible assets existed at June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, different conditions or assumptions used to measure fair value of reporting units, or changes in cash flows or profitability, if significantly negative or unfavorable, could have a material adverse effect on the outcome of the ~~Company's~~Company’s impairment evaluation in the future.

A summary of goodwill and intangible assets is as follows:

	June 30, 2018		December 31, 2017		June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
	(In Thousands)				(In Thousands)

Goodwill – Branch acquisitions	$	5,396	$	5,396	$	5,396	$	5,396
Deposit intangibles
Sun Security Bank		87		263
InterBank		109		181		—		36
Boulevard Bank		336		397		214		275
Valley Bank		1,200		1,400		800		1,000
Fifth Third Bank		2,897		3,213		2,265		2,581
		4,629		5,454		3,279		3,892
	$	10,025	$	10,850	$	8,675	$	9,288

Current Economic Conditions

Changes in economic conditions could cause the values of assets and liabilities recorded in the financial statements to change rapidly, resulting in material future adjustments in asset values, the allowance for loan losses, or capital that could negatively impact the ~~Company's~~Company’s ability to meet regulatory capital requirements and maintain sufficient liquidity.

Following the housing and mortgage crisis and correction beginning in mid-2007, the United States entered ~~into~~ a ~~significant~~ prolonged economic downturn. Unemployment rose from 4.7% in November 2007 to peak at 10.0% in October 2009. The elevated unemployment levels negatively impacted consumer confidence, which had a detrimental impact on industry-wide performance nationally as well as in the Company's Midwest market area. Economic conditions have significantly improved since then, as indicated by consumer confidence levels, increased economic activity and low unemployment levels.

In June 2019, the economy broke the record for the longest period of economic growth in US history. After slower job growth reported in previous months pointed to an economic downturn, the job market increased sharply with 224,000 new jobs added in June. The national unemployment rate remained steady at 3.7% .The rate compares to a 4.0% rate at June 2018 ~~remained steady at 4.0%~~ and is ~~0.3% lower compared to June 2017. Total nonfarm payroll employment edged up by 213,000~~still the lowest rate of unemployed Americans recorded since December 1969. Employment increases were primarily in ~~June with employment increases in professional and~~ business services ~~manufacturing,~~ and health care. ~~The~~In June 2019, the U.S. labor force participation rate (the share of working-age Americans who ~~are~~were either employed or are actively looking for a job) ~~remained unchanged since March at~~was 62.9%. and the employment population ratio was 60.6%, with both ratios changing little over the past few months. The unemployment rate for the Midwest, where most of the ~~Company's~~Company’s business is conducted, ~~was~~remained stable and consistent with the national average at 3.7% ~~which is favorable~~ in ~~comparison to the National unemployment rate of 4.0%.~~June 2019. Unemployment rates atfor June ~~30, 2018,~~2019 were: Missouri at ~~3.5%~~3.3%, Arkansas at ~~3.8%~~3.5%, Kansas at 3.4%, Iowa at ~~2.7%, Nebraska at 2.9%~~2.4%, Minnesota at ~~3.1%~~3.3%, Illinois at 4.3%, Oklahoma at ~~3.9% and~~3.2%, Texas at ~~4.0%~~3.4%, Georgia at 3.7% and Colorado at 3.0%. Of the metropolitan areas in which ~~Great Southern Bank~~the Company does business, the ~~Tulsa~~Chicago area had the highest unemployment level at ~~3.9%~~3.5% as of May ~~2018.~~2019. This rate ~~had~~

has improved significantly since the 5%4.9% rate reported as of ~~June~~December 2017. The unemployment rates for the Springfield and St. Louis market areas were at ~~3.4%~~2.7% and ~~3.3% respectively; were~~3.1%, respectively, well below the national average. Metropolitan areas in ~~Arkansas,~~ Iowa, Missouri, Nebraska and Minnesota ~~boasted~~continued to boast unemployment levels ~~among~~amongst the lowest in the ~~nation~~.nation.

Sales of newly built single-family homes infor June ~~2018~~2019 were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of ~~631,000~~646,000 according to U.S. Census Bureau and the Department of Housing and Urban Development estimates. This is ~~5.3% below~~7% above the revised May 2019 seasonally adjusted annual rate of ~~666,000, but~~604,000, and is ~~2.4%~~4.5% above the June ~~2017 estimate~~2018 seasonally adjusted annual rate of ~~616,000.~~618,000. The median sales price of new houses sold in June ~~2018~~2019 was ~~$302,100, down~~$310,400, up from ~~$315,200~~$302,100 a year earlier. The June 2019 average sales price of $368,600 was ~~$363,300,~~ down slightly from ~~$370,600 as of June 2017. For the first six months of this~~$370,100 a year ~~new-home sales have risen 6.9% as a solid job market and shortage of existing homes on the market have boosted demand.~~ago. The inventory of new homes for sale ~~was 301,000~~ at the end of June ~~which is a 5.7 months'~~would support 6.3 months’ supply at the current sales ~~pace. In the Midwest, new home sales climbed 14.4% year-to-date.~~pace, down from 6.7 months in May 2019.

~~Existing home~~Existing-home sales ~~decreased for the third straight month~~weakened in June, ~~with declines occurring in~~as total sales saw a small decline after a previous month of gains, according to the ~~South and West exceeding sales gains in the Northeast and Midwest. In June 2018,~~National Association of Realtors (NAR). Total existing home sales decreased ~~0.6%~~1.7% from May to a seasonally adjusted ~~annual~~ rate of ~~5.38~~5.27 million which is 2.2% below a year ago. The ongoing supply and demand imbalance helped push June's median sales price to an all-time high. This marks the 76th consecutive month of year over year gains as prices reached an all-time high. The national median existing home price for all housing types in June ~~was $276,900, up 5.2% from June 2017. The Midwest region existing home median sale price was $218,800, up 3.5%~~2019. Sales as a whole are down 2.2% from a year ago. Total housing inventory at the end of June ~~climbed 4.3%~~2019 increased to ~~1.95 million; 0.5% above a year ago.~~1.93 million, up slightly from 1.91 million existing homes available for sale in May 2019, but unchanged from the level of June 2018. Unsold inventory is at a ~~4.3 month~~4.4-month supply at the current sales pace, ~~compared to~~up from a ~~4.2~~4.3-month supply in both May and June 2018.

The median existing home price for all housing types in June 2019 reached an all-time high of $285,700, up 4.3% from June 2018. June’s price increase marks the 88th straight month ~~supply~~of year-over-year gains. The Midwest region existing home median sale price was $230,400, which is up 6.7% from last year. First-time buyers accounted for 35% of sales in June 2019, up slightly from 32% the prior month and 31% a year ago.

According to Freddie Mac, the average commitment rate for a 30-year, conventional, fixed-rate mortgage decreased to 3.80% in June 2019, down from 4.07% in May 2019. The average commitment rate for all of 2018 was 4.54%, up from 3.99% for 2017.

The multi-family sector rebounded in 2017 and 2018, with demand approaching the highest level on record. National vacancy rates were ~~5.8%~~5.7% at the end of June 2019, while our market areas reflected the following vacancy ~~levels;~~levels: Springfield, Mo. at ~~5.3%~~4.6%, St. Louis at ~~8.9%~~8.3%, Kansas City at ~~6.7%~~6.6%, Minneapolis at ~~4.6%~~4.1%, Tulsa, Okla. at ~~9.8%~~8.9%, Dallas-Fort Worth at 7.7% ~~and~~, Chicago at ~~6.0%~~5.9%, Atlanta at 8.4% and Denver at 6.6%. Rent growth picked up in recent months and demand has increased at a steady rate supported by the strong economy. Vacancy rates have increased in Tulsa, St. Louis and Dallas due to an increased number of units coming on-line. Developers continue to favor more-expensive submarkets. Transaction volume has slowed, but pricing has remained on an upward trajectory. Cap rates are still at low levels. Continued increase in the homeownership rate is the largest risk to the apartment sector. Despite ~~supply-side pressure, rent growth~~the decline in ~~2018 had not slowed materially from the previous year's pace. Sales transaction value continued~~affordability and rigid mortgage origination standards, about two-thirds of consumers

still believe now is a good time to ~~be strong, and cap rates appeared~~buy a home, according to ~~have leveled off. Supply is expected~~a recent University of Michigan consumer survey. The homeownership rate has risen by more than a percentage point since 2016, to ~~outpace demand~~64.2% in ~~2018, putting upward pressure on vacancies and slowing rent growth. All~~2019. Per information provided by Integra IRR Viewpoint, all of the ~~Company's~~Company’s market areas within the multi-family sector are in expansion phase with the exception of Denver and Atlanta, which are both currently in a hyper-supply phase.

~~Nationally,~~Per Integra, nationally, approximately ~~one-half~~45% of the suburban office markets are in an expansion market cycle -- characterized by decreasing vacancy rates, moderate/high new construction, high absorption, moderate/high employment growth and medium/high rental rate growth. Signs of late-cycle conditions are spreading in 2019. Both central business district and suburban markets are being categorized as either in recession or in hyper-supply by about one in 10 market respondents. So while most markets are in recovery or expansion, they tilt toward risk in the coming years. The ~~Company's~~Company’s larger market areas in the suburban office expansion market cycle include Minneapolis, Dallas-Ft. Worth, and St. Louis. Tulsa, Okla. and Kansas City are currently in the ~~recovery~~recovery/expansion market cycle -- typified by decreasing vacancy rates, low new construction, moderate absorption, low/moderate employment growth and negative/low rental rate growth. Chicago is currently in a recession market cycle typified by increasing vacancies, low absorption and low new ~~construction.~~construction while Denver is in hyper-supply.

Approximately 70% of the retail sector is in the expansion phase of the market cycle, with ~~the rest~~another 20% in recovery ~~mode. Included~~mode and the remaining 10% in hyper-supply and recession. The Company’s larger market areas included in the retail expansion market segment, are ~~the Company's larger market areas --~~ Chicago, Denver, Minneapolis, Kansas City, Dallas-Ft. Worth, and St. Louis, with Chicago and Minneapolis nearing hyper-supply. The Atlanta and Tulsa markets are each in ~~the latter stages of expansion.~~recovery phase.

The industrial segment, once concentrated in manufacturing, is now epitomized by a dense network of warehousing, distribution, logistics, and R&D/Flex properties which is the conduit of the current global e-commerce revolution. All of the ~~Company's~~Company’s larger industrial market areas are categorized as being in the expansion cycle with prospects of continuing good economic growth. Two market areas, Chicago and Kansas City, are in the latter stages of the expansion cycle.

Occupancy, absorption and rental income levels of commercial real estate properties located throughout the ~~Company's~~Company’s market areas remain stable according to information provided by real estate services firm CoStar Group. Moderate real estate sales and financing activity is continuing to support loan growth.

While current economic indicators show stability nationally in employment, housing starts and prices, commercial real estate occupancy, absorption and rental rates, our management will continue to closely monitor regional, national and global economic conditions, as these could significantly impact our market areas.

~~Loss Sharing Agreements~~

On April 26, 2016, Great Southern Bank executed an agreement with the FDIC to terminate the loss sharing agreements for Team Bank, Vantus Bank and Sun Security Bank, effective immediately. The agreement required the FDIC to pay $4.4 million to settle all outstanding items related to the terminated loss sharing agreements.

The termination of the loss sharing agreements for the TeamBank, Vantus Bank, Sun Security Bank and InterBank transactions have no impact on the yields for the loans that were previously covered under these agreements, as the remaining accretable yield adjustments that affect interest income have not been changed and will continue to be recognized for all FDIC-assisted transactions in the same manner as they have been previously. All post-termination recoveries, gains, losses and expenses related to these previously covered assets are recognized entirely by Great Southern Bank since the FDIC no longer shares in such gains or losses. Accordingly, the Company's earnings are positively impacted to the extent the Company recognizes gains on any sales or recoveries in excess of the carrying value of such assets. Similarly, the Company's future earnings will be negatively impacted to the extent the Company recognizes expenses, losses or charge-offs related to such assets. There will be no future effects on non-interest income (expense) related to adjustments or amortization of the indemnification assets for Team Bank, Vantus Bank, Sun Security Bank or InterBank. All rights and obligations of the Bank and the FDIC under the terminated loss sharing agreements, including the settlement of all existing loss sharing and expense reimbursement claims, have been resolved and terminated.

General

The profitability of the Company and, more specifically, the profitability of its principal subsidiary, the Bank, depends primarily on its net interest income, as well as provisions for loan losses and the level of non-interest income and non-interest expense. Net interest income is the difference between the interest income the Bank earns on its loan and investment portfolios, and the interest it pays on interest-bearing liabilities, which consists mainly of interest paid on deposits and borrowings. Net interest income is affected by the relative amounts of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the interest rates earned or paid on these balances. When interest-earning assets approximate or exceed interest-bearing liabilities, any positive interest rate spread will generate net interest income.

Great Southern's total assets increased ~~$154.3~~$195.3 million, or ~~3.5%~~4.2%, from ~~$4.41~~$4.68 billion at December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, to ~~$4.57~~$4.87 billion at June 30, ~~2018.~~2019. Full details of the current period changes in total assets are provided in the ~~"Comparison~~“Comparison of Financial Condition at June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017"~~2018” section of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Loans. Net outstanding loans increased ~~$133.5~~$123.5 million, or ~~3.6%~~3.1%, from ~~$3.73~~$3.99 billion at December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, to ~~$3.86~~$4.11 billion at June 30, ~~2018.~~2019. Included in the net increase in loans were reductions of ~~$25.5~~$16.0 million in the FDIC-acquired loan portfolios. In addition, there were higher than usual unscheduled significant paydowns on loans during the six months ended June 30, 2018. Loan paydowns in excess of $1.0 million totaled $298 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018. Excluding FDIC-assisted acquired loans and mortgage loans held for sale, total gross loans increased $274.5 million from December 31, 2017 to June 30, 2018. Increases primarily occurred in commercial construction loans, commercial real estate loans, ~~other residential (multi-family) loans and~~ one-to four-family residential mortgage loans and other residential (multi-family) loans. These increases were partially offset by decreases in consumer auto loans. The increases were primarily due to loan growth in our existing banking center network and our commercial loan production offices. Excluding FDIC-assisted acquired loans and mortgage

loans held for sale, total gross loans increased $42.2 million from December 31, 2018 to June 30, 2019. As loan demand is affected by a variety of factors, including general economic conditions, and because of the competition we face and our focus on pricing discipline and credit quality, no assurances can be made regarding our future loan growth. The Company's strategy continues to be focused on maintaining credit risk and interest rate risk at appropriate levels.

Recent loan growth has occurred in several loan types, primarily commercial construction loans, commercial real estate loans, other residential (multi-family) loans and one- to four-family residential mortgage loans and in most of

Great ~~Southern's~~Southern’s primary lending locations, including Springfield, St. Louis, Kansas City, Des Moines and Minneapolis, as well as the loan production offices in Chicago, Dallas, Omaha and ~~Tulsa.~~Tulsa, and offices added recently in Atlanta and Denver. Certain minimum underwriting standards and monitoring help assure the ~~Company's~~Company’s portfolio quality. Great ~~Southern's~~Southern’s loan committee reviews and approves all new loan originations in excess of lender approval authorities. Generally, the Company considers commercial construction, consumer, and commercial real estate loans to involve a higher degree of risk compared to some other types of loans, such as first mortgage loans on one- to four-family, owner-occupied residential properties. For commercial real estate, commercial business and construction loans, the credits are subject to an analysis of the ~~borrower's~~borrower’s and ~~guarantor's~~guarantor’s financial condition, credit history, verification of liquid assets, collateral, market analysis and repayment ability. It has been, and continues to be, Great ~~Southern's~~Southern’s practice to verify information from potential borrowers regarding assets, income or payment ability and credit ratings as applicable and as required by the authority approving the loan. To minimize construction risk, projects are monitored as construction draws are requested by comparison to budget and with progress verified through property inspections. The geographic and product diversity of collateral, equity requirements and limitations on speculative construction projects help to mitigate overall risk in these loans. Underwriting standards for all loans also include loan-to-value ratio limitations, which vary depending on collateral type, debt service coverage ratios or debt payment to income ratio guidelines, where applicable, credit histories, use of guaranties and other recommended terms relating to equity requirements, amortization, and maturity. Consumer loans are primarily secured by new and used motor vehicles and these loans are also subject to certain minimum underwriting standards to assure portfolio quality. While Great ~~Southern's~~Southern’s consumer underwriting and pricing standards have been fairly consistent ~~over the past several years,~~ since ~~the first half of 2016. In response to a more challenging consumer credit environment,~~2016, the Company tightened its underwriting guidelines on automobile lending beginning in the latter part of 2016. Management took this step in an effort to improve credit quality in the portfolio and ~~lower~~reduce delinquencies and charge-offs. The underwriting standards employed by Great Southern for consumer loans include a determination of the applicant's payment history on other debts, credit scores, employment history and an assessment of ability to meet existing obligations and payments on the proposed loan. In 2019, the Company discontinued indirect auto loan originations. See ~~"Item~~“Item 1. Business – Lending Activities – General, – Commercial Real Estate and Construction Lending, and – Consumer ~~Lending"~~Lending” in the ~~Company's~~Company’s December 31, ~~2017~~2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

While our policy allows us to lend up to 95% of the appraised value on one-to four-family residential properties, originations of loans with loan-to-value ratios at that level are minimal. Private mortgage insurance is typically required for loan amounts above the 80% level. Few exceptions occur and would be based on analyses which determined minimal transactional risk to be involved. We consider these lending practices to be consistent with or more conservative than what we believe to be the norm for banks our size. At each of June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, an estimated 0.1% ~~and 0.1%, respectively,~~ of total owner occupied one- to four-family residential loans had loan-to-value ratios above 100% at origination. At each of June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, an estimated ~~1.1% and 1.5%, respectively,~~0.9% of total non-owner occupied one- to four-family residential loans had loan-to-value ratios above 100% at origination.

At June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, troubled debt restructurings totaled ~~$13.4~~$2.0 million, or ~~0.3%~~less than 0.1% of total loans, down ~~$1.6~~$4.9 million from ~~$15.0~~$6.9 million, or ~~0.4%~~0.2% of total loans, at December 31, ~~2017.~~2018. Concessions granted to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties may include a reduction in the interest rate on the loan, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions intended to maximize collection. For troubled debt restructurings occurring during the six months ended June 30, ~~2018, four~~2019, no loans ~~totaling $20,000~~ were restructured into multiple new loans. For troubled debt restructurings occurring during the year ended December 31, ~~2017, no~~2018, five loans totaling $31,000 were restructured into multiple new loans. For further information on troubled debt restructurings, see Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report.

Loans that were acquired through FDIC-assisted transactions, which are accounted for in pools, are currently included in the analysis and estimation of the allowance for loan losses. If expected cash flows ~~expected~~ to be received on any given pool of loans decreases from previous estimates, then a determination is made as to whether the loan pool should be charged down or the allowance for loan losses should be increased (through a provision for loan losses). Acquired loans are described in ~~detail in~~ Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report. For acquired loan pools, the Company may allocate, and at June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, has allocated, a portion of its allowance for loan losses related to these loan pools in a manner similar to how it allocates its allowance for loan losses to those loans which are collectively evaluated for impairment.

The level of non-performing loans and foreclosed assets affects our net interest income and net income. We generally do not accrue interest income on these loans and do not recognize interest income until the loans are repaid or interest payments have been made for a period of time sufficient to provide evidence of performance on the loans. Generally, the higher the level of non-performing assets, the greater the negative impact on interest income and net income.

Available-for-sale Securities.In the six months ended June 30, 2019, available-for-sale securities increased $61.7 million, or 25.3%, from $244.0 million at December 31, 2018, to $305.6 million at June 30, 2019. The increase was primarily due to the purchase of FNMA and GNMA fixed-rate multi-family mortgage-backed securities, partially offset by calls of municipal securities and normal monthly payments received related to the portfolio of mortgage-backed securities. The Company used increased deposits and short-term borrowings to fund this increase in investment securities. The addition of these securities is a component of the Company’s asset/liability management strategy to partially mitigate risk from falling interest rates.

Deposits. The Company attracts deposit accounts through its retail branch network, correspondent banking and corporate services areas, and brokered deposits. The Company then utilizes these deposit funds, along with FHLBank advances and other borrowings, to meet loan demand or otherwise fund its activities. In the six months ended June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, total deposit balances ~~decreased $87,000.~~ increased $163.5 million, or 4.4%. T~~Transaction~~ransaction account balances ~~decreased $13.7~~increased $24.0 million to ~~$2.21~~$2.16 billion at June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, while retail certificates of deposit increased ~~$30.6~~$96.5 million, ~~compared~~ to ~~December 31, 2017, to $1.14~~$1.36 billion at June 30, ~~2018.~~2019. The ~~decreases~~increases in transaction accounts were primarily a result of ~~decreases~~increases in money market ~~deposit accounts, partially offset by increases in~~and NOW ~~account~~ deposit accounts. Retail certificates of deposit increased due to an increase in ~~retail certificates generated through our banking centers, partially offset by a decrease in~~ certificates opened through the ~~Company's~~Company’s internet deposit acquisition channels. In addition, at June 30, ~~2018~~ 2019 and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, customer deposits totaling ~~$28.9~~$30.9 million and ~~$34.5~~$27.9 million, respectively, were part of the CDARS program, which allows customers to maintain balances in an insured manner that would otherwise exceed the FDIC deposit insurance limit. Brokered deposits, including CDARS program purchased funds, were ~~$214.0~~$369.9 million at June 30, ~~2018, a decrease~~2019, an increase of ~~$11.5~~$43.0 million from ~~$225.5~~$326.9 million at December 31, ~~2017.~~2018.

Our deposit balances may fluctuate depending on customer preferences and our relative need for funding. We do not consider our retail certificates of deposit to be guaranteed long-term funding because customers can withdraw their funds at any time with minimal interest penalty. When loan demand trends upward, we can increase rates paid on deposits to increase deposit balances and utilize brokered deposits to provide additional funding. The level of competition for deposits in our markets is high. It is our goal to gain deposit market share, particularly checking accounts, in our branch footprint. To accomplish this goal, increasing rates to attract deposits may be necessary, which could negatively impact the ~~Company's~~Company’s net interest margin.

Our ability to fund growth in future periods may also depend on our ability to continue to access brokered deposits and FHLBank advances. In times when our loan demand has outpaced our generation of new deposits, we have utilized brokered deposits and FHLBank advances to fund these loans. These funding sources have been attractive to us because we can create either fixed or variable rate funding, as desired, which more closely matches the interest rate nature of much of our loan portfolio. While we do not currently anticipate that our ability to access these sources will be reduced or eliminated in future periods, if this should happen, the limitation on our ability to fund additional loans could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Federal Home Loan Bank Advances and Short Term Borrowings. The Company’s Federal Home Loan Bank advances totaled $-0- at both June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018. At both June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, there were no borrowings from the FHLBank, other than overnight advances which are included in the short term borrowings category.

Short term borrowings and other interest-bearing liabilities decreased $24.1 million from $192.7 million at December 31, 2018 to $168.6 million at June 30, 2019. The short term borrowings included overnight FHLBank borrowings of $136.5 million and $178.0 million at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. The Company utilizes both overnight borrowings and short-term FHLBank advances depending on relative interest rates.

Net Interest Income and Interest Rate Risk Management. Our net interest income may be affected positively or negatively by changes in market interest rates. A large portion of our loan portfolio is tied to one-month LIBOR, three-month LIBOR or the "prime rate" and adjusts immediately or shortly after the index rate adjusts (subject to the effect of contractual interest rate floors on some of the loans). We monitor our sensitivity to interest rate changes on an ongoing basis (see "Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk"). In addition, our net interest income may be impacted by changes in the cash flows expected to be received from acquired loan pools. As described in Note 7 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report, the ~~Company's~~Company’s evaluation of cash flows expected to be received from acquired loan pools is on-going and increases in cash flow expectations are recognized as increases in accretable yield through interest income. Decreases in cash flow expectations are recognized as impairments through the allowance for loan losses.

The current level and shape of the interest rate yield curve poses challenges for interest rate risk management. Prior to its increase of 0.25% on December 16, 2015, the ~~Federal Reserve Board~~FRB had last changed interest rates on December 16, 2008. This was the first rate increase since September 29, 2006. The FRB has now also implemented rate increases of 0.25% on ~~six~~eight different occasions beginning December 14, 2016, with the Federal Funds rate now at ~~2.00%~~2.50%. ~~Great Southern has a~~A substantial portion of ~~its~~Great Southern’s loan portfolio ($~~1.34~~1.59 billion at June 30, 2019~~, 2018) which~~) is tied to the one-month or three-month LIBOR index and will be subject to adjustment at least once within 90 days after June 30, 2019~~, 2018.~~. Of these loans, ~~$1.07~~$1.54 billion had interest rate floors. Great Southern also has a significant portfolio of loans ($~~294~~241 million at June 30, 2019~~, 2018) which are~~) tied to a "prime rate" of interest and will adjust immediately with

changes to the ~~"prime rate"~~“prime rate” of interest. But for the interest rate floors, a rate cut by the FRB generally would have an anticipated immediate negative impact on the ~~Company's~~Company’s net interest income due to the large total balance of loans which generally adjust immediately as the Federal Funds rate adjusts. Loans at their floor rates are, however, subject to the risk that borrowers will seek to refinance elsewhere at the lower market rate. Because the Federal Funds rate is still generally low, there may also be a negative impact on the Company's net interest income due to the Company's inability to significantly lower its funding costs in the current competitive rate environment, although interest rates on assets may decline further. Conversely, interest rate increases would normally result in increased interest rates on our LIBOR-based and prime-based loans. ~~The~~As of June 30, 2019, Great Southern's interest rate ~~floors~~risk models indicate that, generally, rising interest rates are expected to have a positive impact on the Company's net interest income, while declining interest rates are expected to have a negative impact on net interest income. We model various interest rate scenarios for rising and falling rates, including both parallel and non-parallel shifts in ~~effect may limit~~rates. The results of our modeling indicate that net interest income is not likely to be materially affected either positively or negatively in the ~~immediate increase~~first twelve months following a rate change, regardless of any changes in interest rates, ~~on certain~~because our portfolios are relatively well matched in a twelve-month horizon. The effects of ~~these loans, until such time as rates rise above the floors. However, the Company may have to increase rates paid~~interest rate changes, if any, on ~~deposits to maintain deposit balances and pay higher rates on borrowings, which could negatively impact~~ net interest ~~margin. The impact of the low rate environment on our net interest margin in future periods is~~income are expected to be ~~fairly neutral. Any margin gained by~~greater in the 12 to 36 months following a rate increases on loans may be somewhat offset by reduced yields from our investment securities (to the extent investment securities are purchased) and our existing loan portfolio as payments are made and the proceeds are potentially reinvested at lower rates on new loans originated. Interest rates on certain adjustable rate loans may reset lower according to their contractual terms and index rate to which they are tied and new loans may be originated at lower market rates than the overall portfolio rate.change. For further discussion of the processes used to manage our exposure to interest rate risk, see ~~"Item~~“Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – How We Measure the Risks to Us Associated with Interest Rate Changes."”

Non-Interest Income and Non-Interest (Operating) Expenses. The Company's profitability is also affected by the level of its non-interest income and operating expenses. Non-interest income consists primarily of service charges and ATM fees, late charges and prepayment fees on loans, gains on sales of loans and available-for-sale investments and other general operating income. ~~The Company recorded a gain in non-interest income in June 2017 related to the termination of the InterBank loss sharing agreements.~~ Non-interest income may also be affected by the Company's interest rate derivative activities, if the Company chooses to implement derivatives. See Note ~~15 "Derivatives~~16 “Derivatives and Hedging ~~Activities"~~Activities” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report.

Operating expenses consist primarily of salaries and employee benefits, occupancy-related expenses, expenses related to foreclosed assets, postage, FDIC deposit insurance, advertising and public relations, telephone, professional fees, office expenses and other general operating expenses. Details of the current period changes in non-interest income and non-interest expense are provided in the ~~"Results~~“Results of Operations and Comparison for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017"~~2018” section of this report.

Effect of Federal Laws and Regulations

General. Federal legislation and regulation significantly affect the operations of the Company and the Bank, and have increased competition among commercial banks, savings institutions, mortgage banking enterprises and other financial institutions. In particular, the capital requirements and operations of regulated banking organizations such as the Company and the Bank have been and will be subject to changes in applicable statutes and regulations from time to time, which changes could, under certain circumstances, adversely affect the Company or the Bank.

Dodd-Frank Act. On July 21, 2010, sweeping financial regulatory reform legislation entitled the ~~"Dodd-Frank~~“Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection ~~Act"~~Act” (the ~~"Dodd-Frank Act"~~“Dodd-Frank Act”) was signed into law. The Dodd-Frank Act implements far-reaching changes across the financial regulatory landscape, including provisions that, among other things, centralize responsibility for consumer financial protection by creating a new agency, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, with broad rulemaking authority for a wide range of consumer protection laws that apply to all banks, require new capital rules (discussed below), change the assessment base for federal deposit insurance, repeal the federal prohibitions on the payment of interest on demand deposits, amend the account balance limit for federal deposit insurance protection, and increase the authority of the ~~Federal Reserve Board~~FRB to examine the Company and its non-bank subsidiaries.

Certain aspects of the Dodd-Frank Act remain subject to rulemaking and take effect over a number of years. Provisions in the legislation that affect deposit insurance assessments and payment of interest on demand deposits could increase the costs associated with deposits. Provisions in the legislation that require revisions to the capital requirements of the Company and the Bank could require the Company and the Bank to seek additional sources of capital in the future.

A provision of the Dodd-Frank Act, commonly referred to as the ~~"Durbin~~“Durbin Amendment,"” directed the FRB to analyze the debit card payments system and fix the interchange rates based upon their estimate of actual costs. The FRB has established the interchange rate for all debit transactions for issuers with over $10 billion in assets at $0.21 per transaction. An additional five basis points of the transaction amount and an additional $0.01 may be collected by the issuer for fraud prevention and recovery, provided the issuer performs certain actions. The Bank is currently exempt from the rule on the basis of asset size.

Certain aspects of the Dodd-Frank Act have been affected by the ~~recently enacted~~ EGRRCP Act, as defined and discussed below under ~~"-EGRRCP~~“-EGRRCP Act."”

Capital Rules. The federal banking agencies have adopted regulatory capital rules that substantially amend the risk-based capital rules applicable to the Bank and the Company. The ~~new~~ rules implement the ~~"Basel III"~~“Basel III” regulatory capital reforms and changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act. ~~"Basel III"~~“Basel III” refers to various documents released by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. For the Company and the Bank, the general effective date of the new rules was January 1, 2015, and, for certain provisions, various phase-in periods and later effective dates apply. The chief features of the new rules are summarized below.

The ~~new~~ rules refine the definitions of what constitutes regulatory capital and add a new regulatory capital element, common equity Tier 1 capital. The minimum capital ratios are (i) a common equity Tier 1 ~~("CET1"~~(“CET1”) risk-based capital ratio of 4.5%; (ii) a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6%; (iii) a total risk-based capital ratio of 8%; and (iv) a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4%. In addition to the minimum capital ratios, the new rules include a capital conservation buffer, under which a banking organization must have CET1 more than 2.5% above each of its minimum risk-based capital ratios in order to avoid restrictions on paying dividends, repurchasing shares, and paying certain discretionary bonuses. The ~~new~~ capital conservation buffer requirement began phasing in on January 1, 2016 when a buffer greater than 0.625% of risk-weighted assets was required, which amount ~~will increase~~increased an equal amount each year until the buffer requirement of greater than 2.5% of risk-weighted assets isbecame fully implemented on January 1, 2019.

Effective January 1, 2015, ~~the new~~these rules also revised the prompt corrective action framework, which is designed to place restrictions on insured depository institutions if their capital levels show signs of weakness. Under the ~~new~~ prompt corrective action requirements, insured depository institutions are required to meet the following in order to qualify

as ~~"well~~“well capitalized:"” (i) a common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 6.5%, (ii) a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 8%, (iii) a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10% and (iv) a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 5%, and must not be subject to an order, agreement or directive mandating a specific capital level.

EGRRCP Act. In May 2018 the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act (the ~~"EGRRCCP Act"~~“EGRRCCP Act”), was enacted to modify or remove certain financial reform rules and regulations, including some of those implemented under the Dodd-Frank Act. While the EGRRCP Act maintains most of the regulatory structure established by the Dodd-Frank Act, it amends certain aspects of the regulatory framework for depository institutions with assets of less than $10 billion and for banks with assets of more than $50 billion. Many of these changes could result in meaningful regulatory relief for community banks such as Great Southern.

The EGRRCP Act, among other matters, expands the definition of qualified mortgages that may be held by a financial institution and simplifies the regulatory capital rules for financial institutions and their holding companies with total consolidated assets of less than $10 billion by instructing the federal banking regulators to establish a single ~~"Community~~“Community Bank Leverage ~~Ratio"~~Ratio” of between 8 and 10 percent. Any qualifying depository institution or its holding company that exceeds the ~~"community~~“community bank leverage ~~ratio"~~ratio” will be considered to have met generally applicable leverage and risk-based regulatory capital requirements and any qualifying depository institution that exceeds the new ratio will be considered to be ~~"well capitalized"~~“well capitalized” under the prompt corrective action rules. In addition, the EGRRCP Act includes regulatory relief for community banks regarding regulatory examination cycles, call reports, the Volcker Rule (proprietary trading prohibitions), mortgage disclosures and risk weights for certain high-risk commercial real estate loans.

It is difficult at this time to predict when or how any new standards under the EGRRCP Act will ultimately be applied to the Company and the Bank or what specific impact the EGRRCP Act and the yet-to-be-written implementing rules and regulations will have on community banks.

Business Initiatives

The Company’s retail banking center network continues to evolve. In ~~June 2018,~~April 2019, the Company consolidated ~~operations of a~~its Fayetteville, Ark., location into its Rogers, Ark., banking center. The Fayetteville office opened in 2014 and did not meet performance expectations. The Company now operates one banking center in Arkansas.

In addition, the Company announced plans to consolidate its Ames, Iowa, banking center into ~~a nearby~~its North Ankeny, Iowa, office in Paola, Kan. The banking center, located at 1 S. Pearl Street, was closed and all accounts were automatically transferred to the banking center at 1515 Baptiste Drive, less than a mile away. A deposit-taking ATM and interactive teller machine are available for customers at the S. Pearl Street building.

On July 20, 2018, the Company closed on the sale of four banking centers in the Omaha, Neb., metropolitan market to Lincoln, Neb.-based West Gate Bank. Pursuant to the purchase and assumption agreement, the Bank sold branch deposits of approximately $56 million and sold substantially all branch-related real estate, fixed assets and ATMs. Based upon deposit balances at the time of closing, the Company recorded a pre-tax gain (excluding expenses related to the sale) of approximately $7.4 million on the sale based on the contractual deposit premium and the sales price of the branch assets.September 2019. The Company ~~estimates that~~entered the ~~gain will increase earnings approximately $0.38 (after tax) per diluted share,~~Ames market through an FDIC-assisted acquisition in ~~the three months ending September 30, 2018. As a result of~~2014, and currently operates this transaction, the Company expects that non-interest income will decrease $300,000–$350,000 annually, non-interest expense will decrease by $1.1– $1.2 million annually, and interest expense will increase by $400,000-$500,000 annually (based on current interest rates for non-deposit funds). Great Southern is maintaining a commercial loan productionone office in the ~~Omaha market and moved that office into a new location in July.~~

During the third quarter of 2018, the Company expects to open commercial loan production offices in Atlanta, Ga., and Denver, Colo., pending regulatory approvals. Local and highly-experienced commercial lenders have been hired to manage each office. The Company also operates commercial loan production offices in Chicago, Dallas, and Tulsa, Okla.

In June 2018, an experienced lender was hired to serve as Small Business Administration (SBA) Manager, a new role in the Company. Based in the Dallas commercial loan production office, the Manager and his staff will exclusively focus on sourcing and servicing SBA 7a, SBA 504 and other commercial real estate loan opportunities throughout Great Southern's market areas.

Ames market.

Comparison of Financial Condition at June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017~~2018

During the six months ended June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the ~~Company's~~Company’s total assets increased by ~~$154.3~~$195.3 million to ~~$4.57~~$4.87 billion. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in loans receivable and ~~cash and cash equivalents, partially offset by a decrease in~~ available-for-sale investment ~~securities and prepaid expenses and other assets.~~securities.

Cash and cash equivalents were ~~$280.5~~$181.4 million at June 30, ~~2018, an increase~~2019, a decrease of ~~$38.2~~$21.4 million, or ~~15.8%~~10.5%, from ~~$242.3~~$202.7 million at December 31, ~~2017.~~ 2018.During the six months ended June 30, 2018, cash and cash equivalents increased primarily due to an increase in Federal Home Loan Bank advances and significant loan repayments during the last week of June 2018.

The Company's available-for-sale securities ~~decreased $9.2~~increased $61.7 million, or ~~5.1%~~25.3%, compared to December 31, ~~2017.~~2018. The ~~decrease~~increase was primarily due to the purchase of FNMA and GNMA fixed-rate multi-family mortgage-backed securities, partially offset by calls of municipal securities and normal monthly payments received related to the portfolio of mortgage-backed securities. The available-for-sale securities portfolio was 6.3% and 5.2% of total assets at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.

Net loans increased ~~$133.5~~$123.5 million from December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, to ~~$3.86~~$4.11 billion at June 30, ~~2018.~~2019. Excluding FDIC-assisted acquired loans and mortgage loans held for sale, total gross loans (including the undisbursed portion of loans) increased $42.2 million, or 0.9%, from December 31, 2018 to June 30, 2019. Increases in outstanding loan totals primarily occurred in commercial construction loans, commercial real estate loans, other residential (multi-family) loans and one- to four-family residential mortgage loans. Partially offsetting the increases in these loans were reductions of ~~$58~~$52 million in consumer auto loans and ~~$25.5~~$16 million in the FDIC-acquired loan portfolios. ~~Excluding FDIC-assisted acquired loans~~

Other real estate owned and ~~mortgage loans held for sale, total gross loans (including the undisbursed portion~~repossessions were $7.1 million at June 30, 2019, a decrease of ~~loans) increased $274.5~~$1.3 million, or 15.8%, from $8.4 million at December 31, ~~2017 to~~2018. Activity in other real estate owned and repossessions during the period is discussed in more detail in the Non-performing Assets section below.

Premises and equipment totaled $143.5 million at June 30, 2019, an increase of $11.0 million, or 8.3%, from $132.4 million at December 31, 2018. This increase is primarily related to the recording of a right-of-use asset for leased premises and assets under the new lease accounting standard adopted January 1, 2019. The right-of-use asset totaled $9.1 million at June 30, 2019.

Total liabilities increased ~~$135.7~~$155.0 million, from ~~$3.94~~$4.14 billion at December 31, ~~2017~~2018 to ~~$4.08~~$4.30 billion at June 30, ~~2018.~~2019. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in ~~FHLB advances~~deposits, partially offset by a decrease in short-term borrowings and securities sold under reverse repurchase agreements with ~~customers, partially offset by a decrease in short-term borrowings.~~customers.

Total deposits ~~decreased $87,000 from December 31, 2017. Deposits decreased due~~increased $163.5 million, or 4.4%, to decreases in brokered funds, including CDARS program purchased funds, transaction accounts and internet-acquired certificates of deposit. These decreases were partially offset by increases in retail certificates of deposit. Transaction$3.89 billion at June 30, 2019. Transaction account balances ~~decreased $13.7~~increased $24.0 million to ~~$2.21~~$2.16 billion at June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, while retail certificates of deposit increased ~~$30.6~~$96.5 million compared to December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, to ~~$1.14~~$1.36 billion at June 30, ~~2018. Customer retail~~2019. The increase in transaction accounts was primarily a result of increases in money market and NOW deposit accounts. Retail certificates ~~increased by $34.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2018, partially offset by~~ ~~decreases of $3.5 million in certificates~~ of deposit increased due to an increase in certificates opened through the ~~Company's~~Company’s internet deposit acquisition channels. In addition, at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, customer deposits totaling $30.9 million and $27.9 million, respectively, were part of the CDARS program, which allows customers to maintain balances in an insured manner that would otherwise exceed the FDIC deposit insurance limit. Brokered deposits, including CDARS program purchased funds, were ~~$214.0~~$369.9 million at June 30, ~~2018, a decrease~~2019, an increase of ~~$11.5~~$43.0 million from ~~$225.5~~$326.9 million at December 31, ~~2017.~~2018.

The ~~Company's Federal Home Loan Bank Advances~~Company’s FHLBank advances totaled ~~$259.0 million~~$-0- at both June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018. At both June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, ~~an increase of $131.5~~there were no borrowings from the FHLBank, other than overnight advances, which are included in the short term borrowings category.

Short term borrowings and other interest-bearing liabilities decreased $24.1 million ~~or 103.1%, compared to $127.5~~from $192.7 million at December 31, ~~2017.~~ 2018 to $168.6 million at June 30, 2019. Short term borrowings at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, included overnight FHLBank borrowings of $136.5 million and $178.0 million, respectively. The ~~increase was due to repayment of~~Company utilizes both overnight ~~FHLB~~ borrowings ~~during the period which were replaced with~~and short-term FHLBank advances ~~funding of loans and temporary funding of decreases in brokered deposits.~~depending on relative interest rates.

Securities sold under reverse repurchase agreements with customers ~~increased $15.0~~decreased $6.7 million from ~~$80.5~~$105.3 million at December 31, ~~2017~~2018 to ~~$95.5~~$98.6 million at June 30, ~~2018.~~2019. These balances fluctuate over time based on customer demand for this product.

~~Short term borrowings decreased $15.2~~Total stockholders' equity increased $40.3 million from ~~$16.6~~$532.0 million at December 31, ~~2017~~2018 to ~~$1.4~~$572.3 million at June 30, ~~2018. The decrease was primarily due to repayment of overnight FHLB borrowings during the period.~~

~~Total stockholders' equity increased $18.6 million from $471.7 million at December 31, 2017 to $490.3 million at June 30, 2018.~~2019. The Company recorded net income of ~~$27.3~~$36.0 million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, and dividends declared on common stock were ~~$7.9~~$19.7 million. Accumulated other comprehensive income ~~decreased $2.0~~increased $22.5 million due to ~~the changes~~increases in the fair value of available-for-sale investment ~~securities.~~ securities and the fair value of cash flow hedges. In addition, total ~~stockholders'~~stockholders’ equity increased ~~$1.2~~$2.4 million due to stock option exercises.These increases were partially offset by repurchases of the Company’s common stock totaling $849,000.

Results of Operations and Comparison for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018

General

Net income was $18.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2019 compared to $13.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 ~~compared to $16.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017.~~. This ~~decrease~~increase of ~~$2.4~~$4.6 million, or ~~14.4%~~32.8%, was primarily due to ~~a decrease~~an increase in ~~non-interest~~net interest income of ~~$8.3~~$3.7 million, or ~~52.8% and an increase~~9.0%, a decrease in non-interest expense of $1.5 million, or ~~5.4%, partially offset by a decrease in income tax expense of $4.2 million, or 58.8% and an increase in net interest income of $3.3 million, or 8.7%.~~

Net income was $27.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to $27.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017. This decrease of $390,000, or 1.4%, was primarily due to a decrease in non-interest income of $9.1 million, or 38.7% and an increase in non-interest expense of $1.3 million, or 2.3%, partially offset by a decrease in income tax expense of $5.7 million, or 50.2%, an increase in net interest income of $4.1 million, or 5.3%5.1%, and a decrease in provision for loan losses of ~~$300,000,~~$350,000, or ~~7.1%~~17.9%, partially offset by an increase in income tax expense of $753,000, or 25.4%, and a decrease in non-interest income of $302,000, or 4.0%.

Net income was $36.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 compared to $27.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018. This increase of $8.7 million, or 31.8%, was primarily due to an increase in net interest income of $8.9 million, or 11.0%, a decrease in non-interest expense of $1.4 million, or 2.3%, a decrease in provision for loan losses of $350,000, or 9.0%, and an increase in non-interest income of $213,000, or 1.5%, partially offset by an increase in income tax expense of $2.1 million, or 37.5%.

Total Interest Income

Total interest income increased ~~$5.2~~$8.8 million, or ~~11.6%~~17.6%, during the three months ended June 30, ~~2018~~ 2019 compared to the three months ended June 30, ~~2017.~~2018. The increase was due to a ~~$5.1~~$7.6 million increase in interest income on loans and a ~~$146,000~~$1.2 million increase in interest income on investments and other interest-earning assets. Interest income on loans increased for the three months ended June 30, ~~2018~~ 2019 compared to the same period in ~~2017,~~2018, due to higher average ~~balances~~rates of interest on loans and higher average ~~rates of interest.~~balances. Interest income from investment securities and other interest-earning assets increased during the three months ended June 30, ~~2018~~ 2019 compared to the same period in ~~2017~~2018 due to higher average rates of interest ~~partially offset by lower~~and higher average balances of investment securities.

Total interest income increased ~~$6.7~~$19.3 million, or ~~7.4%~~19.9%, during the six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~ 2019 compared to the six months ended June 30, ~~2017.~~2018. The increase was due to a ~~$6.5~~$16.9 million increase in interest income on loans and a ~~$195,000~~$2.4 million increase in interest income on investments and other interest-earning assets. Interest income on loans increased for the six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~ 2019 compared to the same period in ~~2017,~~2018, due to higher average ~~balances~~rates of interest on loans and higher average ~~rates of interest.~~balances. Interest income from investment securities and other interest-earning assets increased during the six months ended June 30, 2019 compared to the same period in 2018 due to higher average rates of interest ~~partially offset by lower~~and higher average balances of investment ~~securities and interest-bearing deposits at the Federal Reserve Bank.~~securities.

Interest Income – Loans

During the three months ended June 30, ~~2018~~ 2019 compared to the three months ended June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, interest income on loans increased ~~$3.9~~$4.3 million as a result of higher average interest rates on loans. The average yield on loans increased from ~~4.56% during the three months ended June 30, 2017, to~~ 4.97% during the three months ended June 30, ~~2018. This increase was primarily due~~2018, to ~~increased yields in most loan categories as a result of increased LIBOR~~

~~and Federal Funds interest rates. Interest income on loans increased $1.1 million as the result of higher average loan balances, which increased from $3.79 billion~~5.40% during the three months ended June 30, 2017, to $3.89 billion during the three months ended June 30, 2018. The higher average balances were primarily due to organic loan growth in commercial construction loans, commercial real estate loans and certain other loan categories, partially offset by decreases in consumer loans.

During the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2017, interest income on loans increased $5.5 million as a result of higher average interest rates on loans. The average yield on loans increased from 4.62% during the six months ended June 30, 2017, to 4.91% during the six months ended June 30, 2018.2019. This increase was primarily due to increased yields in most loan categories as a result of increased LIBOR and Federal Funds interest rates. Interest income on loans increased ~~$1.0~~$3.3 million as the result of higher average loan balances, which increased from ~~$3.79~~$3.89 billion during the ~~six~~three months ended June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, to ~~$3.84~~$4.14 billion during the ~~six~~three months ended June 30, ~~2018.~~2019. The higher average balances were primarily due to organic loan growth in commercial construction loans, commercial real estate loans, one- to four-family residential loans and other residential (multi-family) loans, partially offset by ~~a lower amount of accretion income~~decreases in consumer loans and commercial business loans.

During the ~~current year period~~ six months ended June 30, 2019 compared to the ~~prior year period resulting~~six months ended June 30, 2018, interest income on loans increased $10.0 million as a result of higher average interest rates on loans. The average yield on loans increased from 4.91% during the ~~increases~~six months ended June 30, 2018, to 5.41% during the six months ended June 30, 2019. This increase was primarily due to increased yields in ~~expected cash flows~~most loan categories as a result of increased LIBOR and Federal Funds interest rates. Interest income on loans increased $6.9 million as the result of higher average loan balances, which increased from $3.84 billion during the six months ended June 30, 2018, to ~~be received from~~$4.11 billion during the ~~FDIC-acquired~~six months ended June 30, 2019. The higher average balances were primarily due to organic loan ~~pools as previously discussed~~growth in ~~Note 7 of the Notes~~commercial construction loans, commercial real estate loans, one- to ~~Consolidated Financial Statements.~~four-family residential loans and other residential (multi-family) loans, partially offset by decreases in consumer loans and commercial business loans.

On an on-going basis, the Company estimates the cash flows expected to be collected from the acquired loan pools. For each of the loan portfolios acquired, the cash flow estimates have increased, based on the payment histories and the collection of certain loans, thereby reducing loss expectations of certain loan pools, resulting in adjustments to be spread on a level-yield basis over the remaining expected lives of the loan pools. For the three months ended June 30, ~~2018~~ 2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, the adjustments increased interest income by $1.4 million and $1.1 million, ~~and $1.3 million, respectively, and decreased non-interest income by $-0- and $-0-,~~ respectively. ~~The net impact to pre-tax income was $1.1 million and $1.3 million, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.~~ For the six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~ 2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, the adjustments increased interest income by $2.9 million and $2.2 million, ~~and $3.3 million, respectively, and decreased non-interest income by $-0- and $634,000,~~ respectively. ~~The net impact to pre-tax income was $2.2 million and $2.6 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.~~

As of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the remaining accretable yield adjustment that will affect interest income is ~~$2.9~~$5.1 million. Of the remaining adjustments affecting interest income, we expect to recognize ~~$1.4~~$2.0 million of interest income during the remainder of ~~2018.~~2019. Additional adjustments may be recorded in future periods from the FDIC-assisted transactions, as the Company continues to estimate expected cash flows from the acquired loan pools. Apart from the yield accretion, the average yield on loans was 5.27% during the three months ended June 30, 2019, compared to 4.86% during the three months ended June 30, 2018,~~, compared to 4.43% during the~~ ~~three months ended June 30, 2017~~, as a result of higher current market rates on adjustable rate loans and new loans originated during the year. Apart from the yield accretion, the average yield on loans was 5.27% during the six months ended June 30, 2019, compared to 4.79% during the six months ended June 30, 2018.

In October 2018,~~, compared~~ the Company entered into an interest rate swap transaction as part of its ongoing interest rate management strategies to ~~4.45% during~~hedge the risk of its floating rate loans. The notional amount of the swap is $400 million with a termination date in October 2025. Under the terms of the swap, the Company receives a fixed rate of interest of 3.018% and pays a floating rate of interest equal to one-month USD-LIBOR. The floating rate resets monthly and net settlements of interest due to/from the counterparty also occur monthly. To the extent that the fixed rate continues to exceed one-month USD-LIBOR, the Company will receive net interest settlements, which will be recorded as loan interest income. If one-month USD-LIBOR exceeds the fixed rate of interest in future periods, the Company will be required to pay net settlements to the counterparty and will record those net payments as a reduction of interest income on loans. The Company recorded loan interest income related to this swap transaction of $568,000 and $1.1 million, respectively, in the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2017.~~2019.

Interest Income – Investments and Other Interest-earning Assets

Interest income on investments ~~decreased~~increased in the three months ended June 30, ~~2018~~ 2019 compared to the three months ended June 30, ~~2017.~~2018. Interest income ~~decreased $154,000~~increased $921,000 as a result of ~~a decrease~~an increase in average balances from ~~$211.9 million during the three months ended June 30, 2017, to~~ $188.6 million during the three months ended June 30, ~~2018.~~2018, to $309.2 million during the three months ended June 30, 2019. Average balances of securities ~~decreased~~increased primarily due to ~~certain municipal~~purchases of agency multi-family mortgage-backed securities ~~being called and~~which have a fixed rate of interest with expected lives of six to ten years. These purchased securities fit with the ~~normal monthly payments received on the portfolio of mortgage-backed securities. Partially offsetting that decrease, interest~~Company’s current asset/liability management strategies. Interest income increased ~~$118,000~~$203,000 due to an increase in average interest rates from ~~2.51% during the three months ended June 30, 2017, to~~ 2.75% during the three months ended June 30, 2018, to 3.13% during the three months ended June 30, 2019, primarily due to higher market rates of interest on investment securities and a decrease in the volume of prepayments on ~~the~~ mortgage-backed securities.

Interest income on investments ~~decreased~~increased in the six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~ 2019 compared to the six months ended June 30, ~~2017.~~2018. Interest income ~~decreased $379,000~~increased $1.6 million as a result of ~~a decrease~~an increase in average balances from ~~$216.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017, to~~ $187.8 million during the six months ended June 30, ~~2018.~~2018, to $293.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2019. Average balances of securities ~~decreased~~increased primarily due to ~~certain municipal~~purchases of agency multi-family mortgage-backed securities ~~being called and~~which have a fixed rate of interest with expected lives of six to ten years. These purchased securities fit with the ~~normal monthly payments received on the portfolio of mortgage-backed securities. Partially offsetting that decrease, interest~~Company’s current asset/liability management strategies. Interest income increased ~~$238,000~~$424,000 due to an increase in average interest rates from ~~2.56% during the six months ended June 30, 2017, to~~ 2.79% during the six months ended June 30, 2018, to 3.20% during the six months ended June 30, 2019, primarily due to higher market rates of interest on investment securities and a decrease in the volume of prepayments on ~~the~~ mortgage-backed securities.

Interest income on other interest-earning assets increased in the three months ended June 30, ~~2018~~ 2019 compared to the three months ended June 30, ~~2017.~~2018. Interest income increased ~~$181,000~~$169,000 due to an increase in average interest rates from ~~0.84% during the three months ended June 30, 2017, to~~ 1.44% during the three months ended June 30, 2018, to 2.45% during the three months ended June 30, 2019, primarily due to higher market rates of interest on other interest-bearing deposits in financial institutions. ~~Interest~~Partially offsetting that increase, interest income ~~increased $1,000~~decreased $65,000 as a result of ~~an increase~~a decrease in average balances from ~~$120.1 million during the three months ended June 30, 2017, to~~ $120.7 million during the three months ended June 30, ~~2018.~~

201856, to $88.0 million during the three months ended June 30, 2019, primarily due to lower excess funds maintained in other interest-bearing deposits in financial institutions.

Interest income on other interest-earning assets increased in the six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~ 2019 compared to the six months ended June 30, ~~2017.~~2018. Interest income increased ~~$424,000~~$355,000 due to an increase in average interest rates from ~~0.78% during the six months ended June 30, 2017, to~~ 1.54% during the six months ended June 30, 2018, to 2.41% during the six months ended June 30, 2019, primarily due to higher market rates of interest on other interest-bearing deposits in financial institutions. ~~Interest~~Partially offsetting that increase, interest income decreased ~~$88,000~~$108,000 as a result of a decrease in average balances from ~~$129.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017, to~~ $109.9 million during the six months ended June 30, ~~2018.~~2018, to $91.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2019, primarily due to lower excess funds maintained in other interest-bearing deposits in financial institutions .

Total Interest Expense

Total interest expense increased ~~$1.9~~$5.1 million, or ~~27.6%~~58.1%, during the three months ended June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, when compared with the three months ended June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, due to an increase in interest expense on deposits of ~~$1.1~~$5.5 million, or ~~22.4%~~89.2%, ~~and~~ an increase ~~in interest expense on FHLBank advances of $922,000, or 377.9%, partially offset by a decrease~~ in interest expense on short-term borrowing and repurchase agreements of ~~$138,000,~~$679,000, or ~~43.4%~~377.2%, ~~and a decrease~~an increase in interest expense on subordinated debentures issued to capital trust of ~~$14,000,~~$29,000, or ~~5.6%~~12.2%, and an increase in interest expense on subordinated notes of $70,000, or 6.8%, partially offset by a decrease in interest expense on FHLBank advances of $1.2 million, or 100.0%.

Total interest expense increased ~~$2.6~~$10.4 million, or ~~19.3%~~64.2%, during the six months ended June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, when compared with the six months ended June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, due to an increase in interest expense on deposits of ~~$1.7~~$10.3 million, or ~~17.4%~~88.4%, ~~and~~ an increase ~~in interest expense on FHLBank advances of $1.3 million, or 255.1%, partially offset by a decrease~~ in interest expense on short-term borrowing and repurchase agreements of ~~$336,000,~~$1.6 million, or ~~61.8%~~755.8%, ~~and a decrease~~an increase in interest expense on subordinated debentures issued to capital trust of ~~$53,000,~~$94,000, or ~~10.8%~~21.4%, and an increase in interest expense on subordinated notes of $140,000, or 6.8%, partially offset by a decrease in interest expense on FHLBank advances of $1.8 million, or 100.0%.

Interest Expense – Deposits

Interest expense on demand deposits increased ~~$294,000~~$560,000 due to average rates of interest that increased from ~~0.29% in the three months ended June 30, 2017 to~~ 0.37% in the three months ended June 30, ~~2018.~~ 2018 to 0.52% in the three months ended June 30, 2019. Partially offsetting that increase, interest expense on demand deposits decreased $65,000, due to a decrease in average balances from $1.57 billion during the three months ended June 30, 2018 to $1.50 billion during the three months ended June 30, 2019.

Interest expense on demand deposits increased ~~$4,000, with~~$1.1 million due to average rates of interest that increased from 0.35% in the six months ended June 30, 2018 to 0.50% in the six months ended June 30, 2019. Partially offsetting that increase, interest expense on demand deposits decreased $137,000, due to a decrease in average balances offrom $1.57 billion during ~~each of~~ the ~~three~~six months ended June 30, ~~2017 and 2018.~~2018 to $1.49 billion during the six months ended June 30, 2019.

Interest expense on time deposits increased ~~$1.2~~$3.0 million as a result of an increase in average rates of interest from ~~1.09% during the three months ended June 30, 2017, to~~ 1.46% during the three months ended June 30, ~~2018.~~2018, to 2.23% during the three months ended June 30, 2019. Interest expense on time deposits ~~decreased $397,000~~increased $2.0 million due to ~~a decrease~~an increase in average balances of time deposits from ~~$1.42 billion during the three months ended June 30, 2017, to~~ $1.28 billion during the three months ended June 30, ~~2018. The decrease in average balances of time deposits was primarily a result of decreases in~~2018, to $1.73 billion during the three months ended ~~brokered deposits, including CDARS program purchased funds~~June 30, 2019. A large portion of the ~~Company's~~Company’s certificate of deposit portfolio matures within six to eighteen months and therefore reprices fairly quickly; this is consistent with the portfolio over the past several years. Older certificates of deposit that renewed or were replaced with new deposits generally resulted in the Company paying a higher rate of interest due to market interest rate increases ~~in 2017~~during 2018 and ~~2018.~~

Interest expense on demand deposits increased $503,000 due to average rates of interest that increased from 0.29% in the six months ended June 30, 2017 to 0.35% in the six months ended June 30, 2018. Interest expense on demand deposits increased $10,000 due to a small2019. The increase in average balances ~~from $1.56 billion during~~of time deposits was a result of increases in both retail customer time deposits and in brokered deposits added through the ~~six months ended June 30, 2017, to $1.57 billion during the six months ended June 30, 2018.~~CDARS program purchased funds.

Interest expense on time deposits increased ~~$2.1~~$6.2 million as a result of an increase in average rates of interest from ~~1.07% during the six months ended June 30, 2017, to~~ 1.38% during the six months ended June 30, ~~2018.~~2018, to 2.17% during the six months ended June 30, 2019. Interest expense on time deposits ~~decreased $836,000~~increased $3.2 million due to ~~a decrease~~an increase in average balances of time deposits from ~~$1.45 billion during the six months ended June 30, 2017, to~~ $1.31 billion during the six months ended June 30, ~~2018. The decrease in average balances of time deposits was primarily a result of decreases in~~2018, to $1.70 billion during the six months ended ~~brokered deposits, including CDARS program purchased funds~~June 30, 2019. A large portion of the ~~Company's~~Company’s certificate of deposit portfolio matures within six to eighteen months and therefore reprices fairly quickly; this is consistent with the portfolio over the past several years. Older certificates of deposit that renewed or were replaced with new deposits generally resulted in the Company paying a higher rate of interest due to market interest rate increases during 2018 and 2019. The increase in ~~2017~~average balances of time deposits was a result of increases in both retail customer time deposits and ~~2018.~~

in 57brokered deposits added through the CDARS program purchased funds

Interest Expense – FHLBank Advances, Short-term Borrowings and Repurchase Agreements, Subordinated Debentures Issued to Capital Trusts and Subordinated Notes

During the three months ended June 30, ~~2018~~ 2019 compared to the three months ended June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, interest expense on FHLBank advances ~~increased~~decreased $1.2 million due to ~~higher~~a decrease in average balances ~~partially offset by~~from $233.4 million during the three months ended June 30, 2018 to $-0- during the three months ended June 30, 2019. This decrease was primarily due to an overall decrease in term borrowings from the FHLBank. Instead, the Company utilized overnight borrowings from the FHLBank, primarily due to slightly lower ~~average~~ rates ~~of interest. Interest~~compared to term borrowings. These overnight FHLBank borrowings are included in short-term borrowings and repurchase agreements.

During the six months ended June 30, 2019 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2018, interest expense on FHLBank advances decreased $1.8 million due to a decrease in average balances from $189.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2018 to $-0- during the six months ended June 30, 2019. This decrease was primarily due to an overall decrease in term borrowings from the FHLBank. Instead, the Company utilized overnight borrowings from the FHLBank, primarily due to slightly lower rates compared to term borrowings. These overnight FHLBank borrowings are included in short-term borrowings and repurchase agreements.

Interest expense on short-term borrowings and repurchase agreements increased ~~$1.0 million~~$479,000 due to an increase in average rates from 0.51% in the three months ended June 30, 2018 to 1.41% in the three months ended June 30, 2019. The increase was due to an increase in market interest rates during the period and the higher interest rate charged on overnight FHLBank borrowings as compared to customer repurchase agreements. Interest expense on short-term borrowings and repurchase agreements increased $200,000 due to an increase in average balances from $30.4 million during the three months ended June 30, 2017 to $233.4 million during the three months ended June 30, 2018. This increase was primarily due to an increase in borrowings to fund loan growth, as well as the replacement of overnight borrowings with FHLBank advances with a three week maturity due to their more favorable interest rate. The $31.4 million of the Company's long-term higher fixed-rate FHLBank advances were repaid in June 2017. Interest expense on FHLBank advances decreased $125,000 due to a decrease in average interest rates from 3.22% in the three months ended June 30, 2017 to 2.00% in the three months ended June 30, 2018. The decrease in the average rate was due to the repayment of the fixed-rate term FHLBank advances in June 2017 and the borrowing of shorter term FHLBank advances which carried a lower rate.

During the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2017, interest expense on FHLBank advances increased due to higher average balances, partially offset by lower average rates of interest. Interest expense on FHLBank advances increased $1.6 million due to an increase in average balances from $30.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017 to $189.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2018. This increase was due to the same reasons as noted above in the three month period. Interest expense on FHLBank advances decreased $292,000 due to a decrease in average interest rates from 3.26% in the six months ended June 30, 2017 to 1.88% in the six months ended June 30, 2018. The decrease in the average rate was due to the repayment of the $31.4 million of the Company's long-term higher rate fixed-rate FHLBank advances in June 2017 and the borrowing of shorter term FHLBank advances which carried a lower rate.

~~Interest expense on short-term borrowings and repurchase agreements decreased $120,000 due to a decrease in average balances from $234.7 million during the three months ended June 30, 2017 to~~ $141.3 million during the three months ended June 30, 2018 to $244.6 million during the three months ended June 30, 2019, which iswas primarily due to changes in the ~~Company's~~Company’s funding needs and the mix of funding, which can fluctuate. ~~The Company had a much higher amount of~~In the three months ended June 30, 2019, more overnight FHLBank borrowings ~~from the FHLBank in the 2017 period.~~ were utilized.

Interest expense on short-term borrowings and repurchase agreements ~~decreased $18,000~~increased $1.2 million due to ~~a decrease~~an increase in average rates from ~~0.54%~~0.35% in the ~~three~~six months ended June 30, ~~2017~~ 2018 to ~~0.51%~~1.43% in the ~~three~~six months ended June 30, ~~2018.~~2019. The ~~decrease~~increase was due to ~~a change~~an increase in ~~the mix of funding~~market interest rates during the period ~~with less short-term~~and the higher interest rate charged on overnight FHLBank borrowings ~~and a higher percentage of the total made up of~~as compared to customer repurchase ~~agreements, which have a lower interest rate.~~

agreements. Interest expense on short-term borrowings and repurchase agreements ~~decreased $222,000~~increased $408,000 due to ~~a decrease~~an increase in average balances from ~~$236.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017 to~~ $120.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2018 to $251.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2019, which iswas primarily due to changes in the ~~Company's~~Company’s funding needs and the mix of funding, which can fluctuate. The Company had a much higher amount of overnight borrowings from the FHLBank in the 2017 period. Interest expense on short-term borrowings and repurchase agreements decreased $114,000 due to a decrease in average rates from 0.46% inIn the six months ended June 30 ~~2017 to 0.35% in the six months ended June 30, 2018. The decrease was due to a change in the mix of funding during the period, with less short-term~~, 2019, more overnight FHLBank borrowings ~~and a higher percentage of the total made up of repurchase agreements, which have a lower interest rate.~~were utilized.

During the three months ended June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, compared to the three months ended June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, interest expense on subordinated debentures issued to capital trusts ~~decreased $14,000~~increased $29,000 due to ~~lower~~higher average interest rates. The average interest rate was ~~3.92% in the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to~~ 3.70% in the three months ended June 30, ~~2018. During the 2017 period, the amortization of the cost of the interest rate caps the Company purchased in 2013~~2018 compared to limit the interest rate risk from rising LIBOR rates related to the Company's subordinated debentures issued to capital trusts effectively increased the effective interest rate. The average interest rate was affected until the third quarter of 2017, when the interest rate cap terminated based on its contractual terms. There was no change4.16% in the ~~average balance of the subordinated debentures between the 2018 and the 2017 periods.~~three months ended June 30, 2019. The subordinated debentures are variable-rate debentures which bear interest at an average rate of three-month LIBOR plus 1.60%, adjusting quarterly, which was ~~3.96%~~4.18% at June 30, ~~2018.~~

201958

During the six months ended June 30, 2018, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2017, interest expense on subordinated debentures issued to capital trusts decreased $53,000 due to lower average interest rates. The average interest rate was 3.86% in the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to 3.44% in the six months ended June 30, 2018. The reasons for the decrease were the same as those discussed above for the three month period.. There was no change in the average balance of the subordinated debentures between the 2019 and the 2018 periods.

During the six months ended June 30, 2019, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2018, interest expense on subordinated debentures issued to capital trusts increased $94,000 due to higher average interest rates. The average interest rate was 3.44% in the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to 4.18% in the six months ended June 30, 2019. There was no change in the average balance of the subordinated debentures between the 2019 and ~~2017~~the 2018 periods.

In August 2016, the Company issued $75 million of 5.25% fixed-to-floating rate subordinated notes due August 15, 2026. The notes were sold at par, resulting in net proceeds, after underwriting discounts and commissions and other issuance costs, of approximately $73.5 million. Interest expense on the subordinated notes for the three and six ~~month periods.~~months ended June 30, 2019 increased $66,000 and $138,000, respectively, due to deferred issuance cost amortization.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income for the three months ended June 30, ~~2018~~ 2019 increased ~~$3.3~~$3.7 million to ~~$41.2~~$44.9 million compared to ~~$37.9~~$41.2 million for the three months ended June 30, ~~2017.~~2018. Net interest margin was 3.97% in the three months ended June 30, 2019, compared to 3.94% in the three months ended June 30, 2018 ~~compared to 3.68% in the three months ended June 30, 2017,~~, an increase of 26three basis points, or ~~7.1%~~0.8%. In both three month periods, the ~~Company's~~Company’s net interest income and margin were positively impacted by the increases in expected cash flows from the FDIC-acquired loan pools and the resulting increase to ~~be received~~accretable yield, which were previously discussed in Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The positive impact of these changes in the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 were increases in interest income of $1.4 million and $1.1 million, respectively, and increases in net interest margin of 12 basis points and 10 basis points, respectively. Excluding the positive impact of the additional yield accretion, net interest margin increased one basis point when compared to the year-ago three month period. The increase was primarily due to increased yields in most loan categories and higher overall yields on investments and interest-earning deposits at the Federal Reserve Bank, significantly offset by an increase in the average interest rate on deposits and borrowings.

Net interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2019 increased $8.8 million to $89.5 million compared to $80.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018. Net interest margin was 4.02% in the six months ended June 30, 2019, compared to 3.93% in the six months ended June 30, 2018, an increase of nine basis points, or 2.3%. In both six month periods, the Company’s net interest income and margin were positively impacted by the increases in expected cash flows from the FDIC-acquired loan pools and the resulting increase to accretable yield, which were previously discussed in Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The positive impact of these changes in the ~~three~~six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~ 2019 and ~~2017~~2018 were increases in interest income of ~~$1.1~~$2.9 million and ~~$1.3~~$2.2 million, respectively, and increases in net interest margin of 1013 basis points and 1211 basis points, respectively. Excluding the positive impact of the additional yield accretion, net interest margin increased 28seven basis points when compared to the year-ago ~~three~~six month period. The increase was primarily due to increased yields in most loan categories and higher overall yields on investments and interest-earning deposits at the Federal Reserve Bank, partially offset by an increase in the average interest rate on ~~deposits.~~deposits and borrowings.

Net interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2018 increased $4.1 million to $80.7 million compared to $76.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017. Net interest margin was 3.93% in the six months ended June 30, 2018, compared to 3.73% in the same period of 2017, an increase of 20 basis points, or 5.4%. In both six month periods, the Company's net interest income and margin were positively impacted by the increases in expected cash flows to be received from the FDIC-acquired loan pools and the resulting increase to accretable yield which were previously discussed in Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The positive impact of these changes in the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 were increases in interest income of $2.2 million and $3.3 million, respectively, and increases in net interest margin of 11 basis points and 16 basis points, respectively. Excluding the positive impact of the additional yield accretion, net interest margin increased 25 basis points when compared to the year-ago period. The increase was primarily due to increased yields in most loan categories and higher overall yields on investments and interest-earning deposits at the Federal Reserve Bank, partially offset by an increase in the average interest rate on deposits.

The Company's overall average interest rate spread ~~increased 19~~decreased eight basis points, or ~~5.4%~~2.2%, from ~~3.53% during the three months ended June 30, 2017 to~~ 3.72% during the three months ended June 30, ~~2018.~~2018 to 3.64% during the three months ended June 30, 2019. The ~~increase~~decrease was due to a 50 basis point increase in the weighted average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities, partially offset by a 42 basis point increase in the weighted average yield on interest-earning ~~assets, partially offset by a 23 basis point increase in the weighted average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities.~~assets. In comparing the two periods, the yield on loans increased 4143 basis points, the yield on investment securities increased 2438 basis points and the yield on other interest-earning assets increased 60101 basis points. The rate paid on deposits increased 1958 basis points, the rate paid on short-term borrowings and repurchase agreements ~~decreased three~~increased 90 basis points, the rate paid on subordinated debentures issued to capital trusts ~~decreased 22~~increased 46 basis points, the rate paid on subordinated notes ~~decreased two~~increased 36 basis points and the rate paid on FHLBank advances decreased ~~122~~200 basis ~~points.~~points (due to the average balance of FHLBank advances decreasing to $-0-).

The Company's overall average interest rate spread ~~increased 15~~decreased four basis points, or ~~4.1%~~1.1%, from ~~3.58% during the six months ended June 30, 2017 to~~ 3.73% during the six months ended June 30, ~~2018.~~2018 to 3.69% during the six months ended June 30, 2019. The ~~increase~~decrease was due to a ~~33 basis point increase in the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets, partially offset by an 18~~53 basis point increase in the weighted average rate paid on interest-bearing ~~liabilities.~~liabilities, partially offset by a 49 basis point increase in the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets. In comparing the two periods, the yield on loans increased 2950 basis points, the yield on investment securities increased 2341 basis points and the yield on other interest-earning assets increased 7687 basis points. The rate paid on deposits increased 1557 basis points, the rate paid on

short-term borrowings and repurchase agreements ~~decreased 11~~increased 108 basis points, the rate paid on subordinated debentures issued to capital trusts ~~decreased 42~~increased 74 basis points, the rate paid on subordinated notes ~~decreased two~~increased 37 basis points and the rate paid on FHLBank advances decreased ~~138~~188 basis ~~points.~~points (due to the average balance of FHLBank advances decreasing to $-0-).

For additional information on net interest income components, refer to the "Average Balances, Interest Rates and Yields" tables in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Provision for Loan Losses and Allowance for Loan Losses

Management records a provision for loan losses in an amount it believes is sufficient to result in an allowance for loan losses that will cover current net charge-offs as well as risks believed to be inherent in the loan portfolio of the Bank. The amount of provision charged against current income is based on several factors, including, but not limited to, past loss experience, current portfolio mix, actual and potential losses identified in the loan portfolio, economic conditions, and internal as well as external reviews. The levels of non-performing assets, potential problem loans, loan loss provisions and net charge-offs fluctuate from period to period and are difficult to predict.

Weak economic conditions, higher inflation or interest rates, or other factors may lead to increased losses in the portfolio and/or requirements for an increase in loan loss provision expense. Management maintains various controls in an attempt to limit future losses, such as a watch list of possible problem loans, documented loan administration policies and loan review staff to review the quality and anticipated collectability of the portfolio. Additional procedures provide for frequent management review of the loan portfolio based on loan size, loan type, delinquencies, financial analysis, on-going correspondence with borrowers and problem loan work-outs. Management determines which loans are potentially uncollectible, or represent a greater risk of loss, and makes additional provisions to expense, if necessary, to maintain the allowance at a satisfactory level.

The provision for loan losses for the three months ended June 30, ~~2018,~~2019 was $1.6 million compared with $2.0 million ~~unchanged from~~for the three months ended June 30, ~~2017.~~2018. The provision for loan losses for the six months ended June 30, ~~2018,~~2019 was ~~$3.9~~$3.6 million ~~a decrease of $300,000 from $4.2~~compared with $3.9 million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2017.~~2018. At June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, the allowance for loan losses was ~~$37.6~~$39.3 million and ~~$36.5~~$38.4 million, respectively. Total net charge-offs were ~~$704,000~~$997,000 and ~~$2.4 million~~$704,000 for the three months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, respectively. During the three months ended June 30, ~~2018, $748,000~~2019, $679,000 of the $997,000 of net charge-offs were in the consumer auto category. In addition, one commercial loan relationship was responsible for $189,000 of the total net charge-offs during the three months ended June 30, 2019. Total net charge-offs were ~~$2.8~~$2.7 million and ~~$5.1~~$2.8 million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, ~~2018, $2.0~~2019, $1.6 million of the ~~$2.8~~$2.7 million of net charge-offs were in the consumer auto category. In addition, two unrelated commercial loan relationships were responsible for $560,000 of the total net charge-offs during the first six months of 2019.

In response to a more challenging consumer credit environment, the Company tightened its underwriting guidelines on automobile lending in the latter part of 2016. Management took this step in an effort to improve credit quality in the portfolio and ~~reduce~~lower delinquencies and charge-offs. ~~The level of delinquencies and repossessions in indirect and used automobile loans has decreased in 2018.~~ This action also resulted in a lower level of origination volume and, as such, the outstanding balance of the Company's automobile loans ~~declined approximately $58 million~~continued to decline in the six months ended June 30, ~~2018.~~2019. We expect to see ~~further declines~~more rapid reductions in the automobile loan ~~totals through the remainder of 2018. In addition, one commercial loan relationship amounted~~outstanding balance as we determined in February 2019 to ~~$245,000 of the total net charge-offs during the three months ended~~cease providing indirect lending services to automobile dealerships. At June 30, ~~2018. Charge-offs were partially offset by recoveries on multiple~~2019, indirect automobile loans ~~during~~totaled approximately $157 million. We expect this total balance will be largely paid off in the ~~three month period. Four commercial loan relationships amounted~~next two to ~~$505,000 of the total charge-offs during the six months ended June 30, 2018. Unique~~four years. General market conditions and unique circumstances related to individual borrowers and projects contributed to the level of provisions and charge-offs. AsCollateral and repayment evaluations of all assets ~~were~~ categorized as potential problem loans, non-performing loans or foreclosed assets ~~evaluations~~ were ~~made of the values of these assets~~completed with corresponding charge-offs or reserve allocations made as appropriate.

All acquired loans were grouped into pools based on common characteristics and were recorded at their estimated fair values, which incorporated estimated credit losses at the acquisition date. These loan pools are systematically reviewed by ~~Management~~management to determine the risk of losses that may exceed those identified at the time of the acquisition. Techniques used in determining risk of loss are similar to those used to determine the risk of loss for the legacy Great Southern Bank portfolio, with most focus being placed on those loan pools which include the larger loan relationships and those loan pools which exhibit higher risk characteristics. Review of the acquired loan portfolio also includes ~~meetings with customers,~~monitoring of payment performance, review of financial information and credit scores, collateral valuations and customer interaction to determine if any additional reserves are warranted.

The ~~Bank's~~Bank’s allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans, excluding FDIC-acquired loans, was ~~1.02%~~0.97%, ~~1.01%~~0.98% and ~~1.02%~~0.97% at June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, December 31, ~~2017~~2018 and March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively. Management considers the allowance for loan losses adequate to cover losses inherent in the ~~Bank's~~Bank’s loan portfolio at June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, based on recent reviews of the ~~Bank's~~Bank’s loan portfolio and current economic conditions. If economic conditions were to deteriorate or ~~management's~~management’s assessment of the loan portfolio were to change, it is possible that additional loan loss provisions would be required, thereby adversely affecting future results of operations and financial condition.

Non-performing Assets

Non-performing assets acquired through FDIC-assisted transactions, including foreclosed assets and potential problem loans, are not included in the totals or in the discussion of non-performing loans, potential problem loans and foreclosed assets below. These assets were initially recorded at their estimated fair values as of their acquisition dates and are accounted for in ~~pools; therefore,~~pools. Therefore, these loan pools are analyzed rather than the individual loans. The overall performance of the loan pools acquired in each of the five FDIC-assisted transactions has been better than original expectations as of the acquisition dates.

As a result of changes in balances and composition of the loan portfolio, changes in economic and market conditions ~~that occur from time to time~~ and other factors specific to a ~~borrower's~~borrower’s circumstances, the level of non-performing assets will fluctuate.

Non-performing assets, excluding all FDIC-assisted acquired assets, at June 30, ~~2018~~2019 were ~~$21.5~~$15.9 million, ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$6.3~~$4.1 million from ~~$27.8~~$11.8 million at December 31, ~~2017.~~2018. Non-performing assets, excluding all FDIC-assisted acquired assets, as a percentage of total assets were ~~0.47%~~0.33% at June 30, ~~2018~~2019, compared to ~~0.63%~~0.25% at December 31, ~~2017.~~2018.

Compared to December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, non-performing loans ~~decreased $3.1~~increased $5.1 million to ~~$8.1~~$11.4 million at June 30, ~~2018~~,2019, and foreclosed assets decreased ~~$3.2~~$1.0 million to ~~$13.4~~$4.5 million at ~~June 30, 2018. Non-performing commercial business loans comprised $2.9 million, or 35.1%, of the total $8.1 million of non-performing loans~~ at June 30, ~~2018, an increase of $789,000 from December 31, 2017.~~2019. Non-performing ~~one- to four-family residential~~construction and land development loans comprised ~~$2.6~~$3.6 million, or ~~31.9%~~31.2%, of the total non-performing loans at June 30, ~~2018, a decrease~~2019, an increase of ~~$137,000~~$3.5 million from December 31, ~~2017.~~2018. Non-performing ~~consumer~~commercial real estate loans comprised ~~$2.2~~$3.7 million, or ~~27.6%~~32.3%, of the total non-performing loans at June 30, ~~2018, a decrease~~2019, an increase of ~~$1.0~~$3.3 million from December 31, ~~2017.~~2018. Non-performing ~~commercial real estate~~one- to four-family residential loans comprised ~~$352,000,~~$1.5 million, or ~~4.3%~~13.5%, of the total non-performing loans at June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, a decrease of ~~$874,000~~$1.1 million from December 31, ~~2017.~~2018. Non-performing ~~construction and land development~~commercial business loans comprised ~~$91,000,~~$1.4 million, or ~~1.1%~~11.9%, of the total non-performing loans at June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, a decrease of ~~$7,000~~$78,000 from December 31, ~~2017.~~2018. Non-performing ~~other residential~~consumer loans ~~were $-0-~~comprised $1.3 million, or 11.1%, of the total non-performing loans at June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, a decrease of ~~$1.9 million~~$550,000 from December 31, ~~2017, due to the transfer to foreclosed assets and related charge-down of the one property previously in this category of non-performing loans.~~2018.

Non-performing Loans. Activity in the non-performing loans category during the six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~ 2019 was as follows:

	Beginning Balance, January 1		Additions to Non- Performing		Removed from Non- Performing		Transfers to Potential Problem Loans			Transfers to Foreclosed Assets and Repossessions			Charge- Offs			Payments			Ending Balance, June 30		Beginning Balance, January 1		Additions to Non- Performing		Removed from Non- Performing		Transfers to Potential Problem Loans			Transfers to Foreclosed Assets and Repossessions			Charge- Offs			Payments			Ending Balance, June 30
	(In Thousands)																				(In Thousands)
One- to four-family construction	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Subdivision construction		98		—		—		—			—			—			(7	)		91		—		—		—		—			—			—			—			—
Land development		—		—		—		—			—			—			—			—		49		3,727		—		—			—			(220	)		—			3,556
Commercial construction		—		—		—		—			—			—			—			—		—		—		—		—			—			—			—			—
One- to four-family residential		2,728		426		—		(67	)		(236	)		(27	)		(233	)		2,591		2,664		926		—		(87	)		(1,250	)		(490	)		(231	)		1,532
Other residential		1,877		3		—		—			(1,601	)		(279	)		—			—		—		—		—		—			—			—			—			—
Commercial real estate		1,226		157		—		—			(894	)		(101	)		(36	)		352		334		4,074		—		—			—			—			(733	)		3,675
Commercial business		2,063		2,158		—		—			—			(778	)		(591	)		2,852		1,437		50		—		—			—			(24	)		(104	)		1,359
Consumer		3,263		1,554		—		(331	)		(583	)		(1,055	)		(609	)		2,239		1,816		1,122		—		(165	)		(223	)		(893	)		(391	)		1,266

Total	$	11,255	$	4,298	$	—	$	(398	)	$	(3,314	)	$	(2,240	)	$	(1,476	)	$	8,125	$	6,300	$	9,899	$	—	$	(252	)	$	(1,473	)	$	(1,627	)	$	(1,459	)	$	11,388

The increase in non-performing loans during the six months ended June 30, 2019, primarily related to one borrower relationship. This relationship totaled approximately $6.7 million, with collateral consisting of commercial development ground and a single-family property in central Missouri and agricultural ground in Iowa. The loans in this relationship were all cross-collateralized. This relationship is represented in the non-performing land development, commercial real estate and one- to four-family categories as described below. During July 2019, the borrower deeded the properties to the Bank in lieu of foreclosure. This relationship and the corresponding development project originated in 2007.

At June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the non-performing land development category included six loans, three of which were added during 2019. The largest relationship in the category (discussed above) totaled $3.5 million, after a charge-off of $189,000, or 98.4% of the total category. This balance is primarily related to the commercial development ground in Missouri. The non-performing commercial real estate category included five loans, two of which were added during 2019. The largest relationship in the category (discussed above), totaled $2.9 million, or 78.9% of the total category. This balance is primarily related to the agricultural ground in Iowa. The non-performing commercial business category included 10five loans, ~~eight~~one of which ~~were~~was added during ~~2018.~~2019. The largest relationship in this category, which was added during ~~the current period,~~2018, totaled ~~$1.2~~$1.1 million, or ~~41.6%~~79.7% of the total category. This relationship is collateralized by an assignment of an interest in a real

estate project. The second largest relationship in the commercial business category included two loans and totaled $900,000, or 31.6% of the total category. This relationship was previously collateralized by commercial real estate which has been foreclosed upon and subsequently sold. Collection efforts are currently being pursued against the guarantors of the credit relationship. The non-performing one- to four-family residential category included 2719 loans, ~~six~~seven of which were added during ~~the current period.~~2019. The largest relationship in the category (discussed above) totaled $290,000, or 18.9% of the total category. This balance is primarily related to the single-family property in central Missouri. One relationship in this category, which ~~was added during 2017,~~ included nine loans ~~totaling $1.3 million, or 51.1% of the total category, which are~~that were collateralized by residential rental homes in the Springfield, Mo. ~~area.~~area, was charged down $371,000 during 2019 and the remaining balance of $793,000 was transferred to foreclosed assets. The non-performing consumer category included ~~183~~110 loans, 8344 of which were added during ~~the current period,~~2019, and the majority of which are indirect used automobile loans. The non-performing commercial real estate category included five loans, two of which were added during the current period and were part of the same customer relationship. Three loans in the category were transferred to foreclosed assets during the current period, the largest of which totaled $652,000 and was collateralized by commercial property in the St. Louis, Mo., area. The non-performing other residential category had a balance of $-0- at June 30, 2018. The one loan previously in this category, which was collateralized by an apartment project in the central Missouri area, had charge-offs of $279,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2018 and the remaining balance of $1.6 million was transferred to foreclosed assets.

Potential Problem Loans. Compared to December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, potential problem loans increased ~~$738,000,~~$1.7 million, or ~~9.3%~~51.5%, to ~~$8.7~~$5.0 million. This increase was due to the addition of ~~$2.5~~$2.2 million of loans to potential problem loans, partially offset by ~~$1.3 million~~$227,000 in payments, ~~$443,000~~$167,000 in loans transferred to non-performing loans ~~$29,000 in charge-offs~~ and ~~$9,000~~$124,000 in loans ~~removed from potential problem~~transferred to performing loans. Potential problem loans are loans which management has identified through routine internal review procedures as having possible credit problems that may cause the borrowers difficulty in complying with the current repayment terms. These loans are not reflected in non-performing assets, but are considered in determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.

Activity in the potential problem loans category during the six months ended June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, was as follows:

	Beginning Balance, January 1		Additions to Potential Problem		Removed from Potential Problem			Transfers to Non- Performing			Transfers to Foreclosed Assets and Repossessions		Charge- Offs			Payments			Ending Balance, June 30		Beginning Balance, January 1		Additions to Potential Problem		Removed from Potential Problem			Transfers to Non- Performing			Transfers to Foreclosed Assets and Repossessions			Charge- Offs			Payments			Ending Balance, June 30
	(In Thousands)																				(In Thousands)
One- to four-family construction	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Subdivision construction		—		—		—			—			—		—			—			—		—		—		—			—			—			—			—			—
Land development		4		—		—			—			—		—			—			4		—		—		—			—			—			—			—			—
Commercial construction		—		—		—			—			—		—			—			—		—		—		—			—			—			—			—			—
One- to four-family residential		1,122		120		—			—			—		—			(24	)		1,218		1,044		87		—			(152	)		—			—			(139	)		840
Other residential		—		—		—			—			—		—			—			—		—		—		—			—			—			—			—			—
Commercial real estate		5,759		2,056		—			—			—		—			(1,145	)		6,670		2,053		1,931		(124	)		—			—			—			(51	)		3,809
Commercial business		503		—		—			(407	)		—		—			(28	)		68		—		37		—			—			—			—			—			37
Consumer		549		325		(9	)		(36	)		—		(29	)		(85	)		715		206		179		—			(15	)		(4	)		(10	)		(37	)		319

Total	$	7,937	$	2,501	$	(9	)	$	(443	)	$	—	$	(29	)	$	(1,282	)	$	8,675	$	3,303	$	2,234	$	(124	)	$	(167	)	$	(4	)	$	(10	)	$	(227	)	$	5,005

At June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the commercial real estate category of potential problem loans included ~~four~~two loans, one of which was added during the current ~~period.~~year. The largest relationship in ~~this~~the category (added during the current year), which ~~is made up of three loans totaling $4.7~~totaled $1.9 million, or ~~70.6%~~50.5% of the total category, is collateralized by ~~theatre and~~a commercial retail ~~property in Branson, Mo. This is a long-term customer of the Bank and these loans were all originated prior to 2008. The borrower experienced cash flow issues~~building. Payments became past due ~~to vacancies and the loans were added to potential problem loans~~ during the three months ended ~~September 30, 2017. Payments of $1.1 million~~March 31, 2019, but were ~~received on these loans during the six months ended~~current at June 30, ~~2018.~~2019 and a principal payment of $400,000 was received in July 2019. The ~~remaining loan~~second largest relationship in ~~the commercial real estate~~this category (added during 2018), which ~~was added during the current period,~~ totaled ~~$2.0~~$1.9 million, or ~~29.4%~~49.5% of the total category, ~~and~~ is collateralized by a mixed use commercial retail building. Payments were current on this relationship at June 30, 2019. The one- to four-family residential category of potential problem loans included 2117 loans, ~~five~~two of which were added during the current ~~period.~~year. The consumer category of potential problem loans included 5933 loans, 2620 of which were added during the current period. The commercial business category of potential problem loans included three loans, with the largest previous loan in this category, totaling $407,000, being transferred to non-performing loans during the current period.year.

Other Real Estate Owned and Repossessions. Of the total ~~$18.3~~$7.1 million of other real estate owned and repossessions at June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, $~~3.3~~1.3 million represents the fair value of foreclosed and repossessed assets related to loans acquired in FDIC-assisted transactions and ~~$1.6~~$1.3 million represents properties which were not acquired through foreclosure. The foreclosed and other assets acquired in the FDIC-assisted transactions and the properties not acquired through foreclosure are not included in the following table and discussion of other real estate owned and repossessions.

Activity in ~~foreclosed assets~~other real estate owned and repossessions during the ~~six~~three months ended June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, was as follows:

	Beginning Balance, January 1		Additions		Sales			Capitalized Costs		Write- Downs			Ending Balance, June 30		Beginning Balance, January 1		Additions		Sales			Capitalized Costs		Write- Downs			Ending Balance, June 30
	(In Thousands)														(In Thousands)
One- to four-family construction	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—
Subdivision construction		5,413		—		(1,077	)		—		(1,621	)		2,715		1,092		—		(81	)		—		(93	)		918
Land development		7,729		—		(986	)		—		(1,675	)		5,068		3,191		—		(300	)		—		(307	)		2,584
Commercial construction		—		—		—			—		—			—		—		—		—			—		—			—
One- to four-family residential		112		608		(98	)		—		—			622		269		1,286		(1,555	)		—		—			—
Other residential		140		1,601		(140	)		143		—			1,744		—		—		—			—		—			—
Commercial real estate		1,194		894		(343	)		—		—			1,745		—		—		—			—		—			—
Commercial business		—		—		—			—		—			—		—		—		—			—		—			—
Consumer		1,987		4,477		(4,994	)		—		—			1,470		928		2,318		(2,247	)		—		—			999

Total	$	16,575	$	7,580	$	(7,638	)	$	143	$	(3,296	)	$	13,364	$	5,480	$	3,604	$	(4,183	)	$	—	$	(400	)	$	4,501

At June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the land development category of foreclosed assets included 17five properties, the largest of which was located in the ~~northwest Arkansas~~Branson, Mo. area and had a balance of ~~$1.1 million,~~$768,000, or ~~20.8%~~29.7% of the total category. Of the total dollar amount in the land development category of foreclosed assets, ~~42.7% and 20.8%~~59.0% was located in the Branson, Mo. ~~and the northwest Arkansas areas, respectively,~~area, including the largest property previously mentioned. The subdivision construction category of foreclosed assets included 11five properties, the largest of which was located in the ~~Springfield,~~Branson, Mo. ~~metropolitan~~ area and had a balance of ~~$1.0 million,~~$350,000, or ~~36.5%~~38.1% of the total category. Of the total dollar amount in the subdivision construction category of foreclosed assets, ~~46.3% and 36.5%~~67.6% is located in Branson, Mo. ~~and Springfield, Mo.~~, ~~respectively,~~ including the largest property previously mentioned. ~~The write-downs~~All of the properties in the ~~land development and subdivision construction categories resulted from management's decision, after marketing these assets for an extended period,~~one- to reduce the asking price for several parcels of land. The commercial real estate category of foreclosed assets included five properties, three of which were added during the current period. The largest property in the commercial real estate category, which was recreational property in the St. Louis area and was added during the six months ended June 30, 2018, had a balance of $646,000, or 37.0% of the total category. The otherfour-family residential category of foreclosed assets ~~included one property, which was added~~were sold during the ~~current period totaling $1.7 million, and is an apartment building in central Missouri.~~three months ended June 30, 2019. The amount of additions and sales ~~under~~in the consumer loans category are due to ~~the~~a higher volume of repossessions of automobiles, which generally are subject to a shorter repossession process. The Company experienced increased levels of delinquencies and repossessions in indirect and used automobile loans throughout 2016 and 2017. The level of delinquencies and repossessions in indirect and used automobile loans ~~has~~generally decreased in ~~2018.~~2018 and to date in 2019.

Non-interest Income

For the three months ended June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, non-interest income decreased ~~$8.3 million~~$302,000 to ~~$7.5~~$7.2 million when compared to the three months ended June 30, ~~2017~~,2018, primarily as a result of the following items:

~~2017 gain on early termination of FDIC loss sharing agreement for Inter Savings Bank~~Service charges and ATM fees: In the three months ended June 30, 2017, the Company recognized a one-time gross gain of $7.7 million from the termination of the loss sharing agreement for Inter Savings Bank, which was recorded in the accretion of income related to business acquisitions line item of the consolidated statements of income for the three months ended June 30, 2017.

~~Other income: Other income~~Service charges and ATM fees decreased ~~$348,000~~$179,000 compared to the prior year period. This decrease was primarily due to ~~fee income totaling approximately $275,000 related to interest rate swaps entered into~~a decrease in ~~the prior year period, which was not repeated in the current year period.~~overdraft and insufficient funds fees on customer accounts.

~~Late charges and fees on loans~~: Late charges and fees on loans decreased $223,000 compared to the prior year three month period. The decrease was primarily due to fees totaling $130,000 on loan payoffs received on two commercial loan relationships during the 2017 period, with no similar large fees in the current year period.

~~For the six months ended June 30, 2018, non-interest income decreased $9.1 million to $14.4 million when compared to the six months ended June 30, 2017, primarily as a result of the following items:~~

~~2017 gain on early termination of FDIC loss sharing agreement for Inter Savings Bank~~: In 2017, the Company recognized a one-time gross gain of $7.7 million from the termination of the loss sharing agreement for Inter Savings Bank, which was recorded in the accretion of income related to business acquisitions line item of the consolidated statements of income for the six months ended June 30, 2017.

~~Amortization of income related to business acquisitions~~: Because of the termination of the loss sharing agreements in previous years, the net amortization expense related to business acquisitions was $-0- for the six months ended June 30, 2018, compared to $485,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2017, which reduced non-interest income by that amount in the previous year period.

~~Late charges and fees on loans~~: Late charges and fees on loans decreased $712,000 compared to the prior year period. The decrease was primarily due to fees totaling $632,000 on loan payoffs received on four loan relationships in the 2017 period which were not repeated in the 2018 period.

~~Other income~~: Other income decreased $687,000 compared to the prior year period. The decrease was primarily due to the interest rate swap income in 2017 noted above and the receipt of approximately $212,000 related to the exit of certain tax credit partnerships in 2017.

Net gains on loan sales: Net gains on loan sales decreased ~~$603,000~~$183,000 compared to the prior year period. The decrease was due to a decrease in originations of fixed-rate loans during the ~~2018~~2019 period compared to the ~~2017~~2018 period. Fixed rate single-family mortgage loans originated are generally subsequently sold in the secondary market. In ~~2018,~~2019, the Company has originated more ~~variable-rate~~fixed-to-variable-rate single-family mortgage loans, most of which have been retained in the ~~Company's~~Company’s portfolio.

Commissions: Commissions income decreased $149,000 compared to the prior year period. The decrease was due to annuity sales that were approximately 32% lower in the 2019 period compared to the 2018 period.

Other income: Other income increased $293,000 compared to the prior year period. The Company recognized approximately $435,000 more in income from a new debit card contract that became effective at the beginning of 2019.

For the six months ended June 30, 2019, non-interest income increased $213,000 to $14.6 million when compared to the six months ended June 30, 2018, primarily as a result of the following items:

Other income: Other income increased $1.3 million compared to the prior year period. This increase was primarily due to gains totaling $677,000 in the 2019 period from the sale of, or recovery of, receivables and assets that were acquired several years ago in FDIC-assisted transactions. In addition, the Company recognized approximately $769,000 more in income as a result of the new debit card contract discussed previously.

Service charges and ATM fees: Service charges and ATM fees decreased $464,000 compared to the prior year period. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in overdraft and insufficient funds fees on customer accounts.

Net gains on loan sales: Net gains on loan sales decreased $398,000 compared to the prior year period. The decrease was due to a decrease in originations of fixed-rate loans during the 2019 period compared to the 2018 period. Fixed rate single-family mortgage loans originated are generally subsequently sold in the secondary market. In 2019, the Company has originated more fixed-to-variable-rate single-family mortgage loans, most of which have been retained in the Company’s portfolio.

Non-interest Expense

For the three months ended June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, non-interest expense ~~increased~~decreased $1.5 million to ~~$29.9~~$28.4 million when compared to the three months ended June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, primarily as a result of the following items:

Expense on ~~foreclosed assets~~other real estate owned and repossessions: Expense on ~~foreclosed assets increased $2.1~~other real estate owned and repossessions decreased $2.3 million compared to the prior year period primarily due to ~~net~~higher valuation write-downs of certain foreclosed assets during the ~~current~~2018 period ~~totaling~~and higher levels of expense related to consumer repossessions in the 2018 period. During the 2018 period, valuation write-downs of certain foreclosed assets totaled approximately $2.1 ~~million. These~~million, while valuation write-downs ~~resulted from management's decision to reduce~~in the ~~asking price for several parcels of land (subdivision ground, residential lots and commercial lots and undeveloped ground).~~2019 period totaled approximately $197,000.

Acquired deposit intangible asset amortization: Acquired deposit intangible amortization expense decreased $123,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2019 compared to the prior year period. The Company generally amortizes its acquired deposit intangibles over a period of seven years. The amortization of the intangible related to the InterBank acquisition was completed during the first quarter of 2019 and the amortization of the intangible related to the Sun Security Bank acquisition was completed during the third quarter of 2018.

Salaries and employee benefits: Salaries and employee benefits increased ~~$449,000~~$481,000 from the prior year period. The increase was due to staffing additions in the new loan production offices opened in Atlanta and Denver in late 2018, and due to annual employee compensation increases.

Other operating expenses: Other operating expenses increased $192,000 compared to the prior year period. This increase primarily related to a contribution expense totaling $250,000 for the Company’s pledge covering the next ten years related to the $15 million Siouxland Expo Center in Sioux City, Iowa. Currently under construction, the Expo Center is ~~approximately 3% over the prior year expense total~~a multi-purpose event venue that is part of Sioux City’s entertainment and ~~is primarily attributable to normal annual raises for employees and increases in costs for health insurance and retirement benefits.~~cultural reinvestment district.

~~Legal, audit and other professional fees~~: Legal, audit and other professional fees decreased $372,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the same period in 2017. The decrease was primarily due to the recovery of previously expensed legal fees and lower collection costs for problem loans and foreclosed assets.

~~Other operating expenses:~~ Other operating expenses decreased $650,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the same period in 2017. During the 2017 period, the Company incurred a $340,000 prepayment penalty when FHLB advances totaling $31.4 million were repaid prior to maturity, which was not repeated in the 2018 period.

6463

For the six months ended June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, non-interest expense ~~increased~~decreased $1.3 million to ~~$58.2~~$56.9 million when compared to the six months ended June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, primarily as a result of the following items:

Expense on ~~foreclosed assets~~other real estate owned and ~~repossessions:~~repossessions: Expense on ~~foreclosed assets increased $2.6~~other real estate owned and repossessions decreased $2.8 million compared to the prior year period primarily due to ~~the write-down~~higher valuation write-downs of certain foreclosed assets during the ~~current~~prior year period ~~totaling~~and higher levels of expense related to consumer repossessions in the prior year period. During the 2018 period, valuation write-downs of certain foreclosed assets totaled approximately $2.1 million, ~~as discussed above.~~while valuation write-downs in the 2019 period totaled approximately $444,000.

~~Office supplies and printing expense:~~Partnership tax credit ~~Office supplies and printing~~: Partnership tax credit expense decreased ~~$396,000~~$211,000 in the six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 compared to the ~~same~~prior year period. The Company periodically invests in certain tax credits and amortizes those investments over the period that the tax credits are used. The tax credit period for certain of these credits ended in ~~2017. During~~2018; therefore, the ~~2017 period~~final amortization of the ~~Bank incurred printing and other costs totaling $373,000 related to the replacement of a portion of customer debit cards with chip-enabled cards, which was not repeated~~investment in ~~the current year period.~~those credits also ended in 2018.

~~Other operating expenses:~~Acquired deposit intangible asset amortization ~~Other operating expenses~~: Acquired deposit intangible amortization expense decreased ~~$855,000~~$212,000 in the six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 compared to the ~~same~~prior year period. The Company generally amortizes its acquired deposit intangibles over a period ~~in 2017. During~~of seven years, as described above.

Salaries and employee benefits: Salaries and employee benefits increased $1.5 million from the ~~2017 period, the Company incurred a $340,000 prepayment penalty when FHLB advances totaling $31.4 million were repaid~~ prior year period. The increase was due to ~~maturity, which was not repeated~~staffing additions in the new loan production offices opened in Atlanta and Denver in late 2018, ~~period. In addition, the Company experienced significantly lower debit card~~ and ~~check fraud losses in the 2018 period~~due to annual employee compensation increases.

Other operating expenses: Other operating expenses increased $298,000 compared to the ~~2017~~prior year period. This increase primarily related to a contribution expense totaling $250,000 for the Company’s pledge covering the next ten years related to the Siouxland Expo Center in Sioux City, Iowa, as described above.

The ~~Company's~~Company’s efficiency ratio for the three months ended June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, was ~~61.46%~~54.50% compared to ~~52.83%~~61.46% for the same three month period in ~~2017.~~2018. The efficiency ratio for the six months ended June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, was ~~61.26%~~54.62% compared to ~~56.89%~~61.26% for the same period in ~~2017.~~2018. The ~~increase~~improvement in the ratio in both ~~the 2018 three and six month~~2019 periods was primarily due to ~~a decrease in non-interest income and an increase in non-interest expense, partially offset by~~ an increase in net interest ~~income. In the 2017 periods, the Company's efficiency ratio was positively impacted by the significant gain recorded~~income and a decrease in non-interest expense, primarily related to the termination of the InterSavings Bank loss sharing agreements. In the 2018 periods, the Company's efficiency ratio was negatively impacted by the significant write-down of foreclosed assets. Excluding these items, the Company's efficiency ratio would have improveda decrease in ~~the 2018 periods compared to the 2017 periods.~~expenses on other real estate owned and repossessions. The ~~Company's~~Company’s ratio of non-interest expense to average assets was 2.35% and 2.38% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, respectively, compared to 2.66% and 2.63% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, ~~respectively, compared to 2.55% and 2.55% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,~~ respectively. The ~~increase~~decreases in the current three month and six month period ratios ~~was~~were due to decreases in non-interest expenses as described above. The decreases in the current three month and six month period ratios were also due to an increase in ~~non-interest expense~~average assets in the ~~2018~~2019 periods compared to the ~~2017 periods, primarily related to the previously discussed write-down of foreclosed assets in 2018.~~2018 periods. Average assets for the three months ended June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, increased ~~$43.6~~$326.0 million, or ~~1.0%~~7.3%, from the ~~three months~~quarter ended June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, primarily due to ~~an increase~~increases in loans receivable ~~partially offset by a decrease in~~and investment securities. Average assets for the six months ended June 30, ~~2018, decreased $35.4~~2019, increased $340.0 million, or ~~0.8%~~7.7%, from the six months ended June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, primarily due to ~~decreases~~increases in loans receivable and investment ~~securities and other interest-earning assets, partially offset by organic loan growth.~~securities.

Provision for Income Taxes

On December 22, 2017, H.R.1, originally known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the ~~"Act"~~“TJC Act”), was signed into law. Among other things, the TJC Act permanently ~~lowers~~lowered the corporate federal income tax rate to 21% from the prior maximum rate of 35%, effective for tax years including or commencing January 1, 2018. The Company currently expects its effective tax rate (combined federal and state) to ~~decrease from~~be approximately ~~26.7% in 2017 to approximately 16.5%~~17.0% to 18.5% in ~~2018,~~2019 and future years, mainly as a result of the TJC Act.

For the three months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, the Company's effective tax rate was ~~17.6%~~16.8% and ~~30.8%~~17.6%, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, the Company's effective tax rate was ~~17.0%~~17.7% and ~~28.9%~~17.0%, respectively. These effective rates were lower than the statutory federal tax rates of 21% ~~(2018) and 35% (2017)~~, due primarily to the utilization of certain investment tax credits and to tax-exempt investments and tax-exempt loans, which reduced the ~~Company's~~Company’s effective tax rate. The ~~Company's~~Company’s effective tax rate may fluctuate in future periods as it is impacted by the level and timing of the ~~Company's~~Company’s utilization of tax credits and the level of tax-exempt investments and loans and the overall level of pre-tax income. The Company's effective income tax rate is currently expected to continue to be less than the statutory rate due primarily to the factors noted above.

6564

Average Balances, Interest Rates and Yields

The following table presents, for the periods indicated, the total dollar amount of interest income from average interest-earning assets and the resulting yields, as well as the interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities, expressed both in dollars and rates, and the net interest margin. Average balances of loans receivable include the average balances of non-accrual loans for each period. Interest income on loans includes interest received on non-accrual loans on a cash basis. Interest income on loans includes the amortization of net loan fees which were deferred in accordance with accounting standards. Net fees included in interest income were ~~$0.8~~$1.0 million and ~~$0.5 million~~$754,000 for the three months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, respectively. Net fees included in interest income were ~~$1.6~~$2.1 million and ~~$1.7~~$1.6 million for the six months ended June ~~20,~~30, 2019 and 2018, ~~and 2017,~~ respectively. Tax-exempt income was not calculated on a tax equivalent basis. The table does not reflect any effect of income taxes.

6665

	June 30, 2018⁽²⁾			Three Months Ended June 30, 2018								Three Months Ended June 30, 2017								June 30, 2019⁽²⁾			Three Months Ended June 30, 2019								Three Months Ended June 30, 2018
	Yield/ Rate			Average Balance			Interest		Yield/ Rate			Average Balance			Interest		Yield/ Rate			Yield/ Rate			Average Balance			Interest		Yield/ Rate			Average Balance			Interest		Yield/ Rate
	(Dollars in Thousands)																			(Dollars in Thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable: ⁽¹⁾
One- to four-family residential		4.15	%	$	437,856		$	5,422		4.97	%	$	461,321		$	5,528		4.81	%		4.27	%	$	515,749		$	6,556		5.10	%	$	437,856		$	5,422		4.97	%
Other residential		4.88			744,809			9,347		5.03			690,405			7,717		4.48			5.21			819,577			11,270		5.52			744,809			9,347		5.03
Commercial real estate		4.67			1,332,339			15,968		4.81			1,247,830			13,556		4.36			5.02			1,414,009			18,304		5.19			1,332,339			15,968		4.81
Construction		4.94			553,787			7,246		5.25			422,683			4,756		4.51			5.60			713,885			10,585		5.95			553,787			7,246		5.25
Commercial business		4.95			289,895			3,560		4.93			293,411			3,566		4.87			5.33			259,779			3,358		5.18			289,895			3,560		4.93
Other loans		6.00			508,722			6,291		4.96			652,293			7,630		4.69			5.97			403,584			5,450		5.42			508,722			6,291		4.96
Industrial revenue bonds(1)		5.39			22,667			385		6.81			26,144			413		6.33			4.93			14,940			248		6.67			22,667			385		6.81

Total loans receivable		4.96			3,890,075			48,219		4.97			3,794,087			43,166		4.56			5.25			4,141,523			55,771		5.40			3,890,075			48,219		4.97

Investment securities⁽¹⁾		3.18			188,589			1,291		2.75			211,944			1,327		2.51			3.36			309,170			2,415		3.13			188,589			1,291		2.75
Other interest-earning assets		1.90			120,688			433		1.44			120,125			251		0.84			2.50			88,024			537		2.45			120,688			433		1.44

Total interest-earning assets		4.76			4,199,352			49,943		4.77			4,126,156			44,744		4.35			5.07			4,538,717			58,723		5.19			4,199,352			49,943		4.77
Non-interest-earning assets:
Cash and cash equivalents					97,295								108,131											92,500								97,295
Other non-earning assets					199,003								217,764											190,416								199,003
Total assets				$	4,495,650							$	4,452,051										$	4,821,633							$	4,495,650

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand and savings		0.37		$	1,573,936			1,435		0.37		$	1,569,069			1,137		0.29			0.51		$	1,498,795			1,930		0.52		$	1,573,936			1,435		0.37
Time deposits		1.61			1,284,414			4,688		1.46			1,419,996			3,867		1.09			2.25			1,733,163			9,652		2.23			1,284,414			4,688		1.46
Total deposits		0.95			2,858,350			6,123		0.86			2,989,065			5,004		0.67			1.44			3,231,958			11,582		1.44			2,858,350			6,123		0.86
Short-term borrowings and structured repurchase agreements		0.04			141,268			180		0.51			234,655			318		0.54
Short-term borrowings, repurchase agreements and other interest- bearing liabilities																					1.51			244,586			859		1.41			141,268			180		0.51
Subordinated debentures issued to capital trusts		3.96			25,774			238		3.70			25,774			252		3.92			4.18			25,774			267		4.16			25,774			238		3.70
Subordinated notes		5.56			73,752			1,024		5.57			73,594			1,025		5.59			5.91			74,015			1,094		5.93			73,752			1,024		5.57
FHLBank advances		2.06			233,363			1,166		2.00			30,378			244		3.22			—			—			—		—			233,363			1,166		2.00

Total interest-bearing liabilities		1.14			3,332,507			8,731		1.05			3,353,466			6,843		0.82			1.56			3,576,333			13,802		1.55			3,332,507			8,731		1.05
Non-interest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits					653,281								621,429											655,642								653,281
Other liabilities					20,744								26,984											34,504								20,744
Total liabilities					4,006,532								4,001,879											4,266,479								4,006,532
Stockholders' equity					489,118								450,172
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity				$	4,495,650							$	4,452,051
Stockholders’ equity																								555,154								489,118
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity																							$	4,821,633							$	4,495,650

Net interest income:
Interest rate spread		3.62	%				$	41,212		3.72	%				$	37,901		3.53	%		3.51	%				$	44,921		3.64	%				$	41,212		3.72	%
Net interest margin*										3.94	%							3.68	%										3.97	%							3.94	%
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities					126.0	%							123.0	%										126.9	%							126.0	%

_______________________
*	Defined as the ~~Company's~~Company’s net interest income divided by total average interest-earning assets.
(1)	Of the total average balances of investment securities, average tax-exempt investment securities were ~~$53.7~~$43.5 million and ~~$62.5~~$53.7 million for the three months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, respectively. In addition, average tax-exempt loans and industrial revenue bonds were ~~$25.2~~$21.0 million and ~~$28.3~~$25.2 million for the three months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, respectively. Interest income on tax-exempt assets included in this table was ~~$693,000~~$614,000 and ~~$857,000~~$693,000 for the three months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, respectively. Interest income net of disallowed interest expense related to tax-exempt assets was ~~$656,000~~$553,000 and ~~$821,000~~$656,000 for the three months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, respectively.
(2)	The yield on loans at June 30, ~~2018~~2019 does not include the impact of the accretable yield (income) on loans acquired in the FDIC-assisted transactions. See ~~"Net~~“Net Interest ~~Income"~~Income” for a discussion of the effect on results of operations for the three months ended June 30, ~~2018.~~2019.

6766

	June 30, 2018⁽²⁾			Six Months Ended June 30, 2018								Six Months Ended June 30, 2017								June 30, 2019⁽²⁾			Six Months Ended June 30, 2019								Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
	Yield/ Rate			Average Balance			Interest		Yield/ Rate			Average Balance			Interest		Yield/ Rate			Yield/ Rate			Average Balance			Interest		Yield/ Rate			Average Balance			Interest		Yield/ Rate
	(Dollars in Thousands)																			(Dollars in Thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable: ⁽¹⁾
One- to four-family residential		4.15	%	$	434,507		$	10,605		4.92	%	$	472,667		$	11,624		4.96	%		4.27	%	$	506,490		$	12,944		5.15	%	$	434,507		$	10,605		4.92	%
Other residential		4.88			741,782			18,186		4.94			684,965			15,243		4.49			5.21			815,354			22,260		5.51			741,782			18,186		4.94
Commercial real estate		4.67			1,289,141			30,326		4.74			1,232,317			27,085		4.43			5.02			1,400,789			36,000		5.18			1,289,141			30,326		4.74
Construction		4.94			536,478			13,734		5.16			412,200			9,132		4.47			5.60			690,883			20,758		6.06			536,478			13,734		5.16
Commercial business		4.95			287,329			6,904		4.85			293,984			7,380		5.06			5.33			261,967			6,750		5.20			287,329			6,904		4.85
Other loans		6.00			524,995			12,887		4.95			670,642			15,660		4.71			5.97			420,190			11,154		5.35			524,995			12,887		4.95
Industrial revenue bonds(1)		5.39			23,188			742		6.45			26,752			786		5.92			4.93			15,072			461		6.17			23,188			742		6.45

Total loans receivable		4.96			3,837,420			93,384		4.91			3,793,527			86,910		4.62			5.25			4,110,745			110,327		5.41			3,837,420			93,384		4.91

Investment securities⁽¹⁾		3.18			187,803			2,601		2.79			216,130			2,742		2.56			3.36			293,937			4,666		3.20			187,803			2,601		2.79
Other interest-earning assets		1.90			109,944			841		1.54			129,826			505		0.78			2.50			91,182			1,088		2.41			109,944			841		1.54

Total interest-earning assets		4.76			4,135,167			96,826		4.72			4,139,483			90,157		4.39			5.07			4,495,864			116,081		5.21			4,135,167			96,826		4.72
Non-interest-earning assets:
Cash and cash equivalents					99,818								107,974											91,657								99,818
Other non-earning assets					198,226								221,130											185,672								198,226
Total assets				$	4,433,211							$	4,468,587										$	4,773,193							$	4,433,211

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand and savings		0.37		$	1,569,299			2,745		0.35		$	1,562,247			2,232		0.29			0.51		$	1,485,948			3,693		0.50		$	1,569,299			2,745		0.35
Time deposits		1.61			1,307,814			8,961		1.38			1,453,943			7,737		1.07			2.25			1,703,087			18,359		2.17			1,307,814			8,961		1.38
Total deposits		0.95			2,877,113			11,706		0.82			3,016,190			9,969		0.67			1.44			3,189,035			22,052		1.39			2,877,113			11,706		0.82
Short-term borrowings and structured repurchase agreements		0.04			120,494			208		0.35			236,076			544		0.46
Short-term borrowings, repurchase agreements and other interest- bearing liabilities																					1.51			251,347			1,780		1.43			120,494			208		0.35
Subordinated debentures issued to capital trusts		3.96			25,774			440		3.44			25,774			493		3.86			4.18			25,774			534		4.18			25,774			440		3.44
Subordinated notes		5.56			73,733			2,049		5.60			73,573			2,050		5.62			5.91			73,958			2,189		5.97			73,733			2,049		5.60
FHLBank advances		2.06			189,682			1,772		1.88			30,905			499		3.26			—			—			—		—			189,682			1,772		1.88

Total interest-bearing liabilities		1.14			3,286,796			16,175		0.99			3,382,518			13,555		0.81			1.56			3,540,114			26,555		1.52			3,286,796			16,175		0.99
Non-interest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits					641,969								614,827											657,018								641,969
Other liabilities					19,788								26,710											30,011								19,788
Total liabilities					3,948,553								4,024,055											4,227,143								3,948,553
Stockholders' equity					484,658								444,532
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity				$	4,433,211							$	4,468,587
Stockholders’ equity																								546,050								484,658
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity																							$	4,773,193							$	4,433,211

Net interest income:
Interest rate spread		3.62	%				$	80,651		3.73	%				$	76,602		3.58	%		3.51	%				$	89,526		3.69	%				$	80,651		3.73	%
Net interest margin*										3.93	%							3.73	%										4.02	%							3.93	%
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities					125.8	%							122.4	%										127.0	%							125.8	%

_______________________
*	Defined as the ~~Company's~~Company’s net interest income divided by total average interest-earning assets.
(1)	Of the total average balances of investment securities, average tax-exempt investment securities were ~~$54.6~~$45.7 million and ~~$64.4~~$54.6 million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, respectively. In addition, average tax-exempt loans and industrial revenue bonds were ~~$26.2~~$21.4 million and ~~$29.4~~$26.2 million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, respectively. Interest income on tax-exempt assets included in this table was ~~$1.6~~$1.2 million and ~~$1.7~~$1.6 million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, respectively. Interest income net of disallowed interest expense related to tax-exempt assets was ~~$1.5~~$1.1 million and ~~$1.6~~$1.5 million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, respectively.
(2)	The yield on loans at June 30, ~~2018~~2019 does not include the impact of the accretable yield (income) on loans acquired in the FDIC-assisted transactions. See ~~"Net~~“Net Interest ~~Income"~~Income” for a discussion of the effect on results of operations for the six months ended June 30, ~~2018.~~2019.

6867

Rate/Volume Analysis

The following tables present the dollar amounts of changes in interest income and interest expense for major components of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities for the periods shown. For each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided on changes attributable to (i) changes in rate (i.e., changes in rate multiplied by old volume) and (ii) changes in volume (i.e., changes in volume multiplied by old rate). For purposes of this table, changes attributable to both rate and volume, which cannot be segregated, have been allocated proportionately to volume and rate. Tax-exempt income was not calculated on a tax equivalent basis.

	Three Months Ended June 30,									Three Months Ended June 30,
	2018 vs. 2017									2019 vs. 2018
	Increase									Increase
	(Decrease)						Total			(Decrease)					Total
	Due to						Increase			Due to					Increase
	Rate			Volume			(Decrease)			Rate		Volume			(Decrease)
	(Dollars in Thousands)									(Dollars in Thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable	$	3,939		$	1,114		$	5,053		$	4,320	$	3,232		$	7,552
Investment securities		118			(154	)		(36	)		203		921			1,124
Other interest-earning assets		181			1			182			169		(65	)		104
Total interest-earning assets		4,238			961			5,199			4,692		4,088			8,780
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits		294			4			298			560		(65	)		495
Time deposits		1,218			(397	)		821			2,983		1,981			4,964
Total deposits		1,512			(393	)		1,119			3,543		1,916			5,459
Short-term borrowings		(18	)		(120	)		(138	)		479		200			679
Subordinated debentures issued to capital trust		(14	)		—			(14	)		29		—			29
Subordinated notes		(3	)		2			(1	)		66		4			70
FHLBank advances		(125	)		1,047			922			—		(1,166	)		(1,166	)
Total interest-bearing liabilities		1,352			536			1,888			4,117		954			5,071
Net interest income	$	2,886		$	425		$	3,311		$	575	$	3,134		$	3,709

	Six Months Ended June 30,									Six Months Ended June 30,
	2018 vs. 2017									2019 vs. 2018
	Increase									Increase
	(Decrease)						Total			(Decrease)					Total
	Due to						Increase			Due to					Increase
	Rate			Volume			(Decrease)			Rate		Volume			(Decrease)
	(Dollars in Thousands)									(Dollars in Thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable	$	5,459		$	1,015		$	6,474		$	10,012	$	6,931		$	16,943
Investment securities		238			(379	)		(141	)		424		1,641			2,065
Other interest-earning assets		424			(88	)		336			355		(108	)		247
Total interest-earning assets		6,121			548			6,669			10,791		8,464			19,255
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits		503			10			513			1,085		(137	)		948
Time deposits		2,060			(836	)		1,224			6,153		3,245			9,398
Total deposits		2,563			(826	)		1,737			7,238		3,108			10,346
Short-term borrowings		(114	)		(222	)		(336	)		1,164		408			1,572
Subordinated debentures issued to capital trust		(53	)		—			(53	)		94		—			94
Subordinated notes		(1	)		—			(1	)		138		2			140
FHLBank advances		(292	)		1,565			1,273			—		(1,772	)		(1,772	)
Total interest-bearing liabilities		2,103			517			2,620			8,634		1,746			10,380
Net interest income	$	4,018		$	31		$	4,049		$	2,157	$	6,718		$	8,875

6968

Liquidity

Liquidity is a measure of the Company's ability to generate sufficient cash to meet present and future financial obligations in a timely manner through either the sale or maturity of existing assets or the acquisition of additional funds through liability management. These obligations include the credit needs of customers, funding deposit withdrawals, and the day-to-day operations of the Company. Liquid assets include cash, interest-bearing deposits with financial institutions and certain investment securities and loans. As a result of the ~~Company's~~Company’s management of the ability to generate liquidity primarily through liability funding, management believes that the Company maintains overall liquidity sufficient to satisfy its depositors' requirements and meet its ~~customers'~~customers’ credit needs. At June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the Company had commitments of approximately ~~$175.2~~$164.9 million to fund loan originations, ~~$1.13~~$1.14 billion of unused lines of credit and unadvanced loans, and ~~$26.0~~$27.0 million of outstanding letters of credit.

Loan commitments and the unfunded portion of loans at the dates indicated were as follows (in thousands):

	June 30, 2018		March 31, 2018		December 31, 2017		December 31, 2016		December 31, 2015		June 30, 2019		March 31, 2019		December 31, 2018		December 31, 2017		December 31, 2016
Closed loans with unused available lines
Secured by real estate (one- to four-family)	$	144,994	$	138,375	$	133,587	$	123,433	$	105,390	$	153,871	$	154,400	$	150,948	$	133,587	$	123,433
Secured by real estate (not one- to four-family)		15,306		12,382		10,836		26,062		21,857		13,237		10,450		11,063		10,836		26,062
Not secured by real estate - commercial business		104,749		108,262		113,317		79,937		63,865		80,887		83,520		87,480		113,317		79,937

Closed construction loans with unused available lines
Secured by real estate (one-to four-family)		31,221		29,757		20,919		10,047		14,242		28,023		33,818		37,162		20,919		10,047
Secured by real estate (not one-to four-family)		830,592		749,926		718,277		542,326		385,969		818,047		831,155		906,006		718,277		542,326

Loan Commitments not closed
Secured by real estate (one-to four-family)		47,040		37,144		23,340		15,884		13,411		49,694		36,945		24,253		23,340		15,884
Secured by real estate (not one-to four-family)		128,200		200,192		156,658		119,126		120,817		110,647		134,607		104,871		156,658		119,126
Not secured by real estate - commercial business		—		12,995		4,870		7,022		—		4,535		—		405		4,870		7,022

	$	1,302,102	$	1,289,033	$	1,181,804	$	923,837	$	725,551	$	1,258,941	$	1,284,895	$	1,322,188	$	1,181,804	$	923,837

The Company's primary sources of funds are customer deposits, FHLBank advances, other borrowings, loan repayments, unpledged securities, proceeds from sales of loans and available-for-sale securities and funds provided from operations. The Company utilizes particular sources of funds based on the comparative costs and availability at the time. The Company has from time to time chosen not to pay rates on deposits as high as the rates paid by certain of its competitors and, when believed to be appropriate, supplements deposits with less expensive alternative sources of funds.

At June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the Company had these available secured lines and on-balance sheet liquidity:

Federal Home Loan Bank line	$~~463.5~~868.6 million
Federal Reserve Bank line	$~~486.3~~407.4 million
Cash and cash equivalents	$~~280.5~~181.4 million
Unpledged securities	$~~45.9~~141.2 million

Statements of Cash Flows. During both the six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, the Company had positive cash flows from operating activities. The Company experienced negative cash flows from investing activities during both the six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~positive cash flows from investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2017.~~2018. The Company experienced positive cash flows from financing activities during both the six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~negative cash flows from financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2017.~~2018.

7069

Cash flows from operating activities for the periods covered by the Statements of Cash Flows have been primarily related to changes in accrued and deferred assets, credits and other liabilities, the provision for loan losses, depreciation and amortization, realized gains on sales of loans and the amortization of deferred loan origination fees and discounts (premiums) on loans and investments, all of which are non-cash or non-operating adjustments to operating cash flows. Net income adjusted for non-cash and non-operating items and the origination and sale of loans held for sale were the primary source of cash flows from operating activities. Operating activities provided cash flows of ~~$50.4~~$39.2 million and ~~$21.9~~$50.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, ~~and 2017,~~ respectively.

During the six months ended June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, investing activities used cash of $180.3 million, primarily due to the purchase of loans and the net origination of loans, the purchase of investment securities and the purchase of equipment, partially offset by the sale of other real estate owned, the sale of investment securities and payments received on investment securities. Investing activities in the 2018 period used cash of $139.9 million, primarily due to the purchase of loans, ~~and~~ the net origination of loans and the purchase of equipment, partially offset by the sale of other real estate owned and payments received on investment securities. Investing activities in the 2017 period provided cash of $36.6 million, primarily due to the net decrease in loans offset by the purchase of loans, the sale of other real estate owned, payments received on investment securities and payment received from the FDIC for early termination of certain loss sharing agreements.

Changes in cash flows from financing activities during the periods covered by the Statements of Cash Flows are due to changes in deposits after interest credited, changes in FHLBank advances and changes in short-term borrowings, as well as dividend payments to stockholders, purchases of the Company’s common stock and the exercise of common stock options. Financing activities provided cash of ~~$127.7~~$119.7 million and ~~used cash of $125.7~~$127.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, ~~and 2017,~~ respectively. ~~Net cash used in during the 2017 period was due primarily to the decrease in certificates of deposit and repayment of FHLBank advances.~~ In the ~~2018~~2019 three-month period, financing activities provided cash primarily as a result of net increases in checking account balances and certificates of deposit, partially offset by decreases in short-term borrowings. Net cash provided during the 2018 six-month period was due primarily to the net increase in FHLBank advances. Financing activities in the future are expected to primarily include changes in deposits, changes in FHLBank advances, changes in short-term borrowings and dividend payments to stockholders.

Capital Resources

Management continuously reviews the capital position of the Company and the Bank to ensure compliance with minimum regulatory requirements, as well as to explore ways to increase capital either by retained earnings or other means.

At June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the Company's total stockholders' equity and common ~~stockholders'~~stockholders’ equity were ~~$490.3~~each $572.3 million, or ~~10.7%~~11.7% of total assets, equivalent to a book value of ~~$34.69~~$40.30 per common share. At December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, total stockholders' equity and common ~~stockholders'~~stockholders’ equity were ~~$471.7~~each $532.0 million, or ~~10.7%~~11.4% of total assets, equivalent to a book value of ~~$33.48~~$37.59 per common share. At June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the ~~Company's~~Company’s tangible common equity to tangible assets ratio was ~~10.5%~~11.6%, compared to ~~10.5%~~11.2% at December 31, ~~2017.~~2018. (See Non-GAAP Financial Measures below). Included in stockholders’ equity at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, were unrealized gains (net of taxes) on the Company’s available-for-sale investment securities and cash flow hedges (interest rate swap) totaling $32.1 million and $9.6 million, respectively.

Banks are required to maintain minimum risk-based capital ratios. These ratios compare capital, as defined by the risk-based regulations, to assets adjusted for their relative risk as defined by the regulations. Under current guidelines banks must have a minimum common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.50%, a minimum Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.00%, a minimum total risk-based capital ratio of 8.00%, and a minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4.00%. To be considered "well capitalized," banks must have a minimum common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 6.50%, a minimum Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 8.00%, a minimum total risk-based capital ratio of 10.00%, and a minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio of 5.00%. On June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the Bank's common equity Tier 1 capital ratio was ~~12.3%~~12.6%, its Tier 1 capital ratio was ~~12.3%~~12.6%, its total capital ratio was ~~13.2%~~13.5% and its Tier 1 leverage ratio was ~~12.1%~~12.2%. As a result, as of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the Bank was well capitalized, with capital ratios in excess of those required to qualify as such. On December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, the Bank's common equity Tier 1 capital ratio was ~~12.3%~~12.4%, its Tier 1 capital ratio was ~~12.3%~~12.4%, its total capital ratio was ~~13.2%~~13.3% and its Tier 1 leverage ratio was ~~11.7%~~12.2%. As a result, as of December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, the Bank was well capitalized, with capital ratios in excess of those required to qualify as such.

The FRB has established capital regulations for bank holding companies that generally parallel the capital regulations for banks. On June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the Company's common equity Tier 1 capital ratio was ~~10.9%~~11.5%, its Tier 1 capital ratio was ~~11.5%~~12.0%, its total capital ratio was ~~14.1%~~14.5% and its Tier 1 leverage ratio was ~~11.3%~~11.5%. To be considered

well capitalized, a bank holding company must have a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 6.00% and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10.00%. As of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the Company was considered well capitalized, with capital ratios in excess of those required to qualify as such. On December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, the Company's common equity

~~Tier 1 capital ratio was 10.9%, its~~ Tier 1 capital ratio was 11.4%, its Tier 1 capital ratio was 11.9%, its total capital ratio was ~~14.1%~~14.4% and its Tier 1 leverage ratio was ~~10.9%~~11.7%. As of December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, the Company was considered well capitalized, with capital ratios in excess of those required to qualify as such.

In addition to the minimum common equity Tier 1 capital ratio, Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio and total risk-based capital ratio, the Company and the Bank have to maintain a capital conservation buffer consisting of additional common equity Tier 1 capital greater than 2.5% of risk-weighted assets above the required minimum levels in order to avoid limitations on paying dividends, repurchasing shares, and paying discretionary bonuses. This capital conservation buffer requirement began phasing in beginning on January 1, 2016 when a buffer greater than 0.625% of risk-weighted assets was required, which amount increased by an additional 0.625% ~~as of January 1, 2017 and 2018, and will continue to increase an equal amount~~ each year until the buffer requirement of greater than 2.5% of risk-weighted assets iswas fully implemented on January 1, 2019.

For additional information, see ~~"Item~~“Item 1. Business--Government Supervision and ~~Regulation-Capital"~~Regulation-Capital” in the ~~Company's~~Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2017.~~2018.

Dividends. During the three months ended June 30, 2019, the Company declared a common stock cash dividend of $0.32 per share, or 25% of net income per diluted common share for that three month period, and paid a common stock cash dividend of $0.32 per share (which was declared in March 2019). During the three months ended June 30, 2018, the Company declared a common stock cash dividend of $0.28 per share, or 29% of net income per diluted common share for that three month period, and paid a common stock cash dividend of $0.28 per share (which was declared in March 2018). During the ~~three~~six months ended June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, the Company declared a common stock cash ~~dividend~~dividends of ~~$0.24~~$1.39 per share, or ~~21%~~55% of net income per diluted common share for that ~~three~~six month period, and paid a common stock cash dividend of ~~$0.22~~$1.39 per ~~share (which was declared in March 2017).~~share. During the six months ended June 30, 2018, the Company declared a common stock cash dividend of $0.56 per share, or 29% of net income per diluted common share for that six month period, and paid a common stock cash dividend of $0.52 per share. ~~During~~The total dividends declared during the six months ended June 30, ~~2017, the Company declared~~2019, consisted of regular cash dividends of $0.64 per share and a ~~common stock~~special cash dividend of ~~$0.46 per share, or 24% of net income per diluted common share for that six month period, and paid a common stock cash dividend of $0.44~~$0.75 per share. The Board of Directors meets regularly to consider the level and the timing of dividend payments. The ~~$0.28~~$0.32 per share dividend declared but unpaid as of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, was paid to stockholders in July ~~2018.~~ 2019.

Common Stock Repurchases and Issuances. The Company has been in various buy-back programs since May 1990. During the three ~~and six month periods~~months ended June 30, ~~2018 and 2017, respectively,~~2019, the Company issued 30,858 shares of stock at an average price of $28.50 per share to cover stock option exercises and did not repurchase any shares of its common stock. During the three months ended June 30, 2018, the Company issued 22,681 shares of stock at an average price of $27.75 per share to cover stock option ~~exercises.~~exercises and did not repurchase any shares of its common stock. During the ~~three~~six months ended June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, the Company issued ~~25,328~~66,458 shares of stock at an average price of ~~$30.07~~$29.06 per share to cover stock option ~~exercises.~~exercises and repurchased 16,040 shares of its common stock at an average price of $52.93 per share. During the six months ended June 30, 2018, the Company issued 46,290 shares of stock at an average price of $25.38 per share to cover stock option ~~exercises. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company issued 66,267~~exercises and did not repurchase any shares of ~~stock at an average price of $26.84 per share to cover stock option exercises.~~its common stock.

On April 18, 2018, the Company's Board of Directors authorized management to repurchase up to 500,000 shares of the Company's outstanding common stock, under a program of open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions. The plan does not have an expiration date. The authorization of this new plan also terminated the previous repurchase plan which was approved in November 2006, with an authorization to repurchase up to 700,000 shares of the Company's outstanding common stock.

Management has historically utilized stock buy-back programs from time to time as long as management believed that repurchasing the stock would contribute to the overall growth of shareholder value. The number of shares of stock that will be repurchased at any particular time and the prices that will be paid are subject to many factors, several of which are outside of the control of the Company. The primary factors, however, are the number of shares available in the market from sellers at any given time, the price of the stock within the market as determined by the market and the projected impact on the ~~Company's~~Company’s earnings per share and capital.

7271

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

This document contains certain financial information determined by methods other than in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ~~("GAAP"~~(“GAAP”)~~. These non-GAAP financial measures include~~, consisting of the tangible common equity to tangible assets ratio.

In calculating the ratio of tangible common equity to tangible assets, we subtract period-end intangible assets from common equity and from total assets. Management believes that the presentation of this measure excluding the impact of intangible assets provides useful supplemental information that is helpful in understanding our financial condition and results of operations, as it provides a method to assess ~~management's~~management’s success in utilizing our tangible capital as well as our capital strength. Management also believes that providing a measure that excludes balances of intangible assets, which are subjective components of valuation, facilitates the comparison of our performance with the performance of our peers. In addition, management believes that this is a standard financial measure used in the banking industry to evaluate performance.

This non-GAAP financial measure is supplemental and is not a substitute for any analysis based on GAAP financial measures. Because not all companies use the same calculation of non-GAAP measures, this presentation may not be comparable to ~~other~~ similarly titled measures as calculated by other companies.

Non-GAAP Reconciliation: Ratio of Tangible Common Equity to Tangible Assets

June 30, December 31,
2018 2017
(Dollars in Thousands)

Common equity at period end $ 490,271 $ 471,662
Less: Intangible assets at period end 10,025 10,850
Tangible common equity at period end (a) $ 480,246 $ 460,812

Total assets at period end $ 4,568,863 $ 4,414,521
Less: Intangible assets at period end 10,025 10,850
Tangible assets at period end (b) $ 4,558,838 $ 4,403,671

Tangible common equity to tangible assets (a) / (b) 10.53 % 10.46 %

	June 30,			December 31,
	2019			2018
	(Dollars in Thousands)

Common equity at period end	$	572,309		$	531,977
Less: Intangible assets at period end		8,675			9,288
Tangible common equity at period end (a)	$	563,634		$	522,689

Total assets at period end	$	4,871,522		$	4,676,200
Less: Intangible assets at period end		8,675			9,288
Tangible assets at period end (b)	$	4,862,847		$	4,666,912

Tangible common equity to tangible assets (a) / (b)		11.59	%		11.20	%

7372

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Asset and Liability Management and Market Risk

A principal operating objective of the Company is to produce stable earnings by achieving a favorable interest rate spread that can be sustained during fluctuations in prevailing interest rates. The Company has sought to reduce its exposure to adverse changes in interest rates by attempting to achieve a closer match between the periods in which its interest-bearing liabilities and interest-earning assets can be expected to reprice through the origination of adjustable-rate mortgages and loans with shorter terms to maturity and the purchase of other shorter term interest-earning assets.

Our Risk When Interest Rates Change

The rates of interest we earn on assets and pay on liabilities generally are established contractually for a period of time. Market interest rates change over time. Accordingly, our results of operations, like those of other financial institutions, are impacted by changes in interest rates and the interest rate sensitivity of our assets and liabilities. The risk associated with changes in interest rates and our ability to adapt to these changes is known as interest rate risk and is our most significant market risk.

How We Measure the Risk to Us Associated with Interest Rate Changes

In an attempt to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates and comply with applicable regulations, we monitor Great Southern's interest rate risk. In monitoring interest rate risk we regularly analyze and manage assets and liabilities based on their payment streams and interest rates, the timing of their maturities and their sensitivity to actual or potential changes in market interest rates.

The ability to maximize net interest income is largely dependent upon the achievement of a positive interest rate spread that can be sustained despite fluctuations in prevailing interest rates. Interest rate sensitivity is a measure of the difference between amounts of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities which either reprice or mature within a given period of time. The difference, or the interest rate repricing "gap," provides an indication of the extent to which an institution's interest rate spread will be affected by changes in interest rates. A gap is considered positive when the amount of interest-rate sensitive assets exceeds the amount of interest-rate sensitive liabilities repricing during the same period, and is considered negative when the amount of interest-rate sensitive liabilities exceeds the amount of interest-rate sensitive assets during the same period. Generally, during a period of rising interest rates, a negative gap within shorter repricing periods would adversely affect net interest income, while a positive gap within shorter repricing periods would result in an increase in net interest income. During a period of falling interest rates, the opposite would be true. As of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, Great Southern's interest rate risk models indicate that, generally, rising interest rates are expected to have a positive impact on the Company's net interest income, while declining interest rates ~~would~~are expected to have a negative impact on net interest income. We model various interest rate scenarios for rising and falling rates, including both parallel and non-parallel shifts in rates. The results of our modeling indicate that net interest income is not likely to be materially affected either positively or negatively in the first twelve months following a rate change, regardless of any changes in interest rates, because our portfolios are relatively well matched in a twelve-month horizon. The effects of interest rate changes, if any, on net interest income are expected to be ~~more impacting to net interest income~~greater in the 12 to 36 months following a rate ~~change.~~change.

The current level and shape of the interest rate yield curve poses challenges for interest rate risk management. Prior to its increase of 0.25% on December 16, 2015, the ~~Federal Reserve Board~~FRB had last changed interest rates on December 16, 2008. This was the first rate increase since ~~September~~June 29, 2006. The FRB has now also implemented rate increases of 0.25% on ~~six~~eight different occasions beginning December 14, 2016, with the Federal Funds rate now at ~~2.00%~~2.50%. A substantial portion of Great Southern's loan portfolio ($~~1.34~~1.59 billion at June 30, ~~2018)~~2019) is tied to the one-month or three-month LIBOR index and will be subject to adjustment at least once within 90 days after June 30, ~~2018.~~2019. Of these loans, ~~$1.07~~$1.54 billion as of June 30, ~~2018~~2019 had interest rate floors. Great Southern also has a ~~significant~~ portfolio of loans ($~~294~~241 million at June 30, ~~2018) which are~~2019) tied to a "prime rate" of interest and will adjust immediately with changes to the "prime rate" of ~~interest.~~interest.

7473

Interest rate risk exposure estimates (the sensitivity gap) are not exact measures of an institution's actual interest rate risk. They are only indicators of interest rate risk exposure produced in a simplified modeling environment designed to allow management to gauge the Bank's sensitivity to changes in interest rates. They do not necessarily indicate the impact of general interest rate movements on the Bank's net interest income because the repricing of certain categories of assets and liabilities is subject to competitive and other factors beyond the Bank's control. As a result, certain assets and liabilities indicated as maturing or otherwise repricing within a stated period may in fact mature or reprice at different times and in different amounts and cause a change, which potentially could be material, in the Bank's interest rate risk.

In order to minimize the potential for adverse effects of material and prolonged increases and decreases in interest rates on Great Southern's results of operations, Great Southern has adopted asset and liability management policies to better match the maturities and repricing terms of Great Southern's interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Management recommends and the Board of Directors sets the asset and liability policies of Great Southern which are implemented by the Asset and Liability Committee. The Asset and Liability Committee is chaired by the Chief Financial Officer and is comprised of members of Great Southern's senior management. The purpose of the Asset and Liability Committee is to communicate, coordinate and control asset/liability management consistent with Great Southern's business plan and board-approved policies. The Asset and Liability Committee establishes and monitors the volume and mix of assets and funding sources taking into account relative costs and spreads, interest rate sensitivity and liquidity needs. The objectives are to manage assets and funding sources to produce results that are consistent with liquidity, capital adequacy, growth, risk and profitability goals. The Asset and Liability Committee meets on a monthly basis to review, among other things, economic conditions and interest rate outlook, current and projected liquidity needs and capital positions and anticipated changes in the volume and mix of assets and liabilities. At each meeting, the Asset and Liability Committee recommends appropriate strategy changes based on this review. The Chief Financial Officer or his designee is responsible for reviewing and reporting on the effects of the policy implementations and strategies to the Board of Directors at their monthly meetings.

In order to manage its assets and liabilities and achieve the desired liquidity, credit quality, interest rate risk, profitability and capital targets, Great Southern has focused its strategies on originating adjustable rate loans or loans with fixed rates that mature in less than five years, and managing its deposits and borrowings to establish stable relationships with both retail customers and wholesale funding sources.

At times, depending on the level of general interest rates, the relationship between long- and short-term interest rates, market conditions and competitive factors, we may determine to increase our interest rate risk position somewhat in order to maintain or increase our net interest margin.

The Asset and Liability Committee regularly reviews interest rate risk by forecasting the impact of alternative interest rate environments on net interest income and market value of portfolio equity, which is defined as the net present value of an institution's existing assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet instruments, and evaluating such impacts against the maximum potential changes in net interest income and market value of portfolio equity that are authorized by the Board of Directors of Great Southern.

In the normal course of business, the Company may use derivative financial instruments (primarily interest rate swaps) from time to time to assist in its interest rate risk management. In 2011, the Company began executing interest rate swaps with commercial banking customers to facilitate their respective risk management strategies. Those interest rate swaps are simultaneously hedged by offsetting interest rate swaps that the Company executes with a third party, such that the Company minimizes its net risk exposure resulting from such transactions. Because the interest rate swaps associated with this program do not meet the strict hedge accounting requirements, changes in the fair value of both the customer swaps and the offsetting swaps are recognized directly in earnings. These interest rate derivatives result from a service provided to certain qualifying customers and, therefore, are not used to manage interest rate risk in the ~~Company's~~Company’s assets or liabilities. The Company manages a matched book with respect to its derivative instruments in order to minimize its net risk exposure resulting from such ~~transactions.~~transactions.

In ~~2013,~~October 2018, the Company entered into an interest rate ~~cap agreement related~~swap transaction as part of its ongoing interest rate management strategies to hedge the risk of its floating rate ~~debt associated~~loans. The notional amount of the swap is $400 million with ~~its trust preferred securities.~~a termination date of October 6, 2025. Under the terms of the swap, the Company receives a fixed rate of interest of 3.018% and pays a floating rate of interest equal to one-month USD-LIBOR. The ~~agreement provided~~floating rate will be

reset monthly and net settlements of interest due to/from the counterparty will also occur monthly. The floating rate of interest was 2.4185% as of June 30, 2019. The Company receives net interest settlements which will be recorded as loan interest income to the extent that the ~~counterparty would reimburse~~fixed rate of interest continues to exceed one-month USD-LIBOR. If USD-LIBOR exceeds the fixed rate of interest in future periods, the Company ~~if interest rates rise above a certain threshold, thus creating a cap on~~is required to pay net settlements to the ~~effective interest rate paid by the Company. This agreement was classified~~counterparty and record those net payments as a ~~hedging instrument, and the~~reduction of interest income on loans. The effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative ~~was~~

is reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction ~~affects~~affected earnings. ~~The interest rate cap related to~~Gains and losses on the ~~$25.0 million trust preferred security terminated per its contractual terms~~derivative representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in ~~the third quarter of 2017.~~current earnings.

~~For further information on~~The Company’s interest rate derivatives and hedging activities ~~see~~ are discussed further in Note 1516 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

We maintain a system of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13(a)-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act")) that is designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported accurately and within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate. An evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures was carried out as of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and several other members of our senior management. Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that the information we are required to disclose in the reports we file or submit under the Act is (i) accumulated and communicated to our management (including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer) to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms.

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13(a)-15(f) under the Act) that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

We do not expect that our internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control procedure, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control procedure are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control procedures, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns in controls or procedures can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any control procedure also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control procedure, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

In the normal course of business, the Company and its subsidiaries are subject to pending and threatened legal actions, some of which seek substantial relief or damages. While the ultimate outcome of such legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, after reviewing pending and threatened litigation with counsel, management believes at this time that, except as noted below, the outcome of such litigation will not have a material adverse effect on the ~~Company's~~Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes to the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2017.~~

762018.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

On April 18, 2018, the Company's Board of Directors authorized management to repurchase up to 500,000 shares of the Company's outstanding common stock, under a program of open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions. The plan does not have an expiration date. The authorization of this new plan terminated the ~~previously~~previous repurchase plan which was approved in November 2006, with an authorization to repurchase up to 700,000 shares of the Company's outstanding common stock.

As indicated below, nothe Company repurchased the following shares ~~were purchased~~of its common stock during the three months ended June 30, ~~2018.~~2019.

Total Number

of Shares

Purchased

Average

Price

Per Share

Total Number

of Shares

Purchased

As Part of

Publicly

Announced

Plan

Maximum

Number of

Shares that

May Yet Be

Purchased

Under the

Plan(1)

April 1, ~~2018~~2019 – April 30, ~~2018~~2019

~~500,000~~466,418

May 1, ~~2018~~2019 – May 31, ~~2018~~2019

~~500,000~~466,418

June 1, ~~2018~~2019 – June 30, ~~2018~~2019

~~500,000~~466,418

~~_______________________~~			______________________
(1)	Amount represents the number of shares available to be repurchased under the April 2018 plan as of the last calendar day of the month shown.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

	a)	Exhibits
		~~See Exhibit Index.~~

~~SIGNATURES~~

~~Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.~~

	~~Great Southern Bancorp, Inc.~~
	~~Registrant~~
~~Date: August 3, 2018~~	~~/s/ Joseph W. Turner~~
	~~Joseph W. Turner~~ ~~President and Chief Executive Officer~~ ~~(Principal Executive Officer)~~
~~Date: August 3, 2018~~	~~/s/ Rex A. Copeland~~
	~~Rex A. Copeland~~ ~~Treasurer~~ ~~(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)~~

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.	~~Description~~
	DESCRIPTION
(2)	Plan of acquisition, reorganization, arrangement, liquidation, or succession

	(i)	The Purchase and Assumption Agreement, dated as of March 20, 2009, among Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Receiver of TeamBank, N.A., Paola, Kansas, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Great Southern Bank, previously filed with the Commission (File no. 000-18082) as Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 26, 2009 is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 2.1(i).

	(ii)	The Purchase and Assumption Agreement, dated as of September 4, 2009, among Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Receiver of Vantus Bank, Sioux City, Iowa, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Great Southern Bank, previously filed with the Commission (File no. 000-18082) as Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 11, 2009 is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 2.1(ii).

	(iii)	The Purchase and Assumption Agreement, dated as of October 7, 2011, among Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Receiver of Sun Security Bank, Ellington, Missouri, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Great Southern Bank, previously filed with the Commission (File no. 000-18082) as Exhibit 2.1(iii) to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 2(iii).

	(iv)	The Purchase and Assumption Agreement, dated as of April 27, 2012, among Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Receiver of Inter Savings Bank, FSB, Maple Grove, Minnesota, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Great Southern Bank, previously filed with the Commission (File no. 000-18082) as Exhibit 2.1(iv) to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 2(iv).

	(v)	The Purchase and Assumption Agreement All Deposits, dated as of June 20, 2014, among Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Receiver of Valley Bank, Moline, Illinois, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Great Southern Bank, previously filed with the Commission (File no. 000-18082) as Exhibit 2.1(v) to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 20, 2014 is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 2(v).

(3)	Articles of incorporation and Bylaws

	(i)	The Registrant's Charter previously filed with the Commission as Appendix D to the Registrant's Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on March 31, 2004 (File No. 000-18082), is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 3.1.

	(iA)	The Articles Supplementary to the Registrant's Charter setting forth the terms of the Registrant's Senior Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A, previously filed with the Commission (File no. 000-18082) as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 18, 2011, are incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 3(i).

	(ii)	The Registrant's Bylaws, previously filed with the Commission (File no. 000-18082) as Exhibit 3(ii) to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 19, 2007, is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 3.2.

(4)	Instruments defining the rights of security holders, including indentures

	The Company hereby agrees to furnish the SEC upon request, copies of the instruments defining the rights of the holders of each issue of the Registrant's long-term debt.

7977


(9)	Voting trust agreement

	Inapplicable.

(10)	Material contracts

	The Registrant's 2003 Stock Option and Incentive Plan previously filed with the Commission (File No. 000-18082) as Annex A to the Registrant's Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on April 14, 2003, is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.2.

	The employment agreement dated September 18, 2002 between the Registrant and William V. Turner previously filed with the Commission (File no. 000-18082) as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.3.

	The employment agreement dated September 18, 2002 between the Registrant and Joseph W. Turner previously filed with the Commission (File no. 000-18082) as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.4.

	The form of incentive stock option agreement under the Registrant's 2003 Stock Option and Incentive Plan previously filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File no. 000-18082) filed on February 24, 2005 is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.5.

	The form of non-qualified stock option agreement under the Registrant's 2003 Stock Option and Incentive Plan previously filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File no. 000-18082) filed on February 24, 2005 is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.6.

	A description of the current salary and bonus arrangements for ~~2018~~2019 for the Registrant's executive officers previously filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2017~~2018 is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.7.

	A description of the current fee arrangements for the Registrant's directors previously filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2017~~2018 is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.8.

	Small Business Lending Fund – Securities Purchase Agreement, dated August 18, 2011, between the Registrant and the Secretary of the United States Department of the Treasury, previously filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 18, 2011, is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.9.

	The Registrant's 2013 Equity Incentive Plan previously filed with the Commission (File No. 000-18082) as Annex A to the Registrant's Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on April 4, 2013, is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.10.

	The form of incentive stock option award agreement under the Registrant's 2013 Equity Incentive Plan previously filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File no. 333-189497) filed on June 20, 2013 is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.11.

	The form of non-qualified stock option award agreement under the Registrant's 2013 Equity Incentive Plan previously filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File no. 333-189497) filed on June 20, 2013 is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.12.


	The form of stock appreciation right award agreement under the Registrant's 2013 Equity Incentive Plan previously filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File no. 333-189497) filed on June 20, 2013 is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.13.

	The form of restricted stock award agreement under the Registrant's 2013 Equity Incentive Plan previously filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File no. 333-189497) filed on June 20, 2013 is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.14.

8078

	The Registrant's 2018 Omnibus Incentive Plan previously filed with the Commission (File No. 000-18082) as Appendix A to the Registrant's Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on March 27, 2018, is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.15.

	The form of incentive stock option award agreement under the Registrant's 2018 Omnibus Incentive Plan previously filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File no. 333-225665) filed on June 15, 2018 is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.16.

	The form of non-qualified stock option award agreement under the Registrant's 2018 Omnibus Incentive Plan previously filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File no. 333-225665) filed on June 15, 2018 is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.17.

~~(11)~~	~~Statement re computation of per share earnings~~

	~~Included in~~ ~~Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements~~.

(15)	Letter re unaudited interim financial information

	Inapplicable.

(18)	Letter re change in accounting principles

	~~Inapplicable.~~

~~(19)~~	~~Report furnished to securityholders.~~

	~~Inapplicable.~~

~~(22)~~	~~Published report regarding matters submitted to vote of security holders~~

	Inapplicable.

(23)	Consents of experts and counsel

	Inapplicable.

(24)	Power of attorney

	None.

~~(31.1)~~ (31.1)	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer

	Attached as Exhibit 31.1

~~(31.2)~~ (31.2)	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Treasurer

	Attached as Exhibit 31.2

~~(32)~~ (32)	Certification pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

	Attached as Exhibit 32. 32.

(99)	Additional Exhibits

	None.

(101)	Attached as Exhibit 101 are the following financial statements from the Great Southern Bancorp, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30 ~~2018,~~, 2019, formatted in Extensive Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) consolidated statements of financial condition, (ii) consolidated statements of income, (iii) consolidated statements of comprehensive income, (iv) consolidated statements of cash flows and (v) notes to consolidated financial statements.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	Great Southern Bancorp, Inc.
	Registrant
Date: August 7, 2019	/s/ Joseph W. Turner
	Joseph W. Turner President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Date: August 7, 2019	/s/ Rex A. Copeland
	Rex A. Copeland Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

8180

Maryland		43-1524856
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification ~~Number)~~No.)

1451 E. Battlefield, Springfield, Missouri		65804
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(417) 887-4400

Title of each class	Trading Symbol	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock,
par value $0.01 per share	GSBC	The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC

Large accelerated filer / /	Accelerated filer /X/
Non-accelerated filer / /	~~(Do not check if a smaller~~ ~~reporting company)~~
	Smaller reporting company / /
	Emerging growth company / /

	THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
	2019			2018
	(Unaudited)

INTEREST INCOME
Loans	$	55,771		$	48,219
Investment securities and other		2,952			1,724
TOTAL INTEREST INCOME		58,723			49,943

INTEREST EXPENSE
Deposits		11,582			6,123
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		—			1,166
Short-term borrowings and repurchase agreements		859			180
Subordinated debentures issued to capital trust		267			238
Subordinated notes		1,094			1,024
TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE		13,802			8,731
NET INTEREST INCOME		44,921			41,212
Provision for Loan Losses		1,600			1,950
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES		43,321			39,262

NON-INTEREST INCOME
Commissions		163			312
Service charges and ATM fees		5,309			5,488
Net gains on loan sales		376			559
Late charges and fees on loans		356			385
Gain (loss) on derivative interest rate products		(44	)		11
Other income		997			704
TOTAL NON-INTEREST INCOME		7,157			7,459

NON-INTEREST EXPENSE
Salaries and employee benefits		15,428			14,947
Net occupancy and equipment expense		6,449			6,298
Postage		784			834
Insurance		662			650
Advertising		842			632
Office supplies and printing		226			301
Telephone		839			792
Legal, audit and other professional fees		630			689
Expense on other real estate and repossessions		419			2,737
Partnership tax credit investment amortization		91			91
Acquired deposit intangible asset amortization		289			412
Other operating expenses		1,724			1,532
TOTAL NON-INTEREST EXPENSE		28,383			29,915

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES		22,095			16,806
Provision for Income Taxes		3,720			2,967
NET INCOME AND NET INCOME AVAILABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS	$	18,375		$	13,839

Basic Earnings Per Common Share	$	1.29		$	0.98
Diluted Earnings Per Common Share	$	1.28		$	0.97
Dividends Declared Per Common Share	$	0.32		$	0.28

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
							Total
	Interest Only		Term		Combination		Modification
	(In Thousands)

Consumer	$	—	$	5	$	—	$	5

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
							Total
	Interest Only		Term		Combination		Modification
	(In Thousands)

Commercial business	$	—	$	—	$	274	$	274
Consumer		—		5		—		5

	$	—	$	5	$	274	$	279

	June 30, 2018
				Foreclosed
	Loans			Assets
	(In Thousands)

Initial basis for loss sharing determination,
net of activity since acquisition date	$	12,154		$	35
Reclassification from nonaccretable discount to accretable discount
due to change in expected losses (net of accretion to date)		(494	)		—
Original estimated fair value of assets, net of activity since
acquisition date		(11,543	)		(35	)

Expected loss remaining	$	117		$	—

	June 30 2018
				Foreclosed
	Loans			Assets
	(In Thousands)

Initial basis, net of activity since acquisition date	$	56,313		$	1,637
Non-credit premium/(discount), net of activity since acquisition date		—			—
Reclassification from nonaccretable discount to accretable discount
due to change in expected losses (net of accretion to date)		(412	)		—
Original estimated fair value of assets, net of activity since
acquisition date		(51,649	)		(1,631	)

Expected loss remaining	$	4,252		$	6