UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
|
| |
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014March 31, 2015
or
|
| |
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from �� to
Commission File Number 1-13270
|
|
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) |
|
| | |
Delaware | | 90-0023731 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| |
10603 W. Sam Houston Parkway N., Suite 300 Houston, TX | | 77064 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
(713) 849-9911
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
| | | | | | |
Large accelerated filer | | x | | Accelerated filer | | ¨ |
| | | |
Non-accelerated filer | | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | Smaller reporting company | | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
As of OctoberApril 16, 2014,2015, there were 53,938,94553,486,963 outstanding shares of Flotek Industries, Inc. common stock, $0.0001 par value.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share data) | | | September 30, 2014 | | December 31, 2013 | March 31, 2015 | | December 31, 2014 |
ASSETS | | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 5,257 |
| | $ | 2,730 |
| $ | 2,499 |
| | $ | 1,266 |
|
Restricted cash | 801 |
| | — |
| |
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $645 and $872 at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively | 69,253 |
| | 65,016 |
| |
Inventories, net | 81,439 |
| | 63,132 |
| |
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $851 and $847 at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively | | 56,011 |
| | 78,624 |
|
Inventories | | 98,162 |
| | 85,958 |
|
Deferred tax assets, net | 2,840 |
| | 2,522 |
| 1,799 |
| | 2,696 |
|
Other current assets | 9,622 |
| | 4,261 |
| 9,275 |
| | 11,055 |
|
Total current assets | 169,212 |
| | 137,661 |
| 167,746 |
| | 179,599 |
|
Property and equipment, net | 83,270 |
| | 79,114 |
| 88,239 |
| | 86,111 |
|
Goodwill | 71,131 |
| | 66,271 |
| 72,820 |
| | 71,131 |
|
Deferred tax assets, net | 14,090 |
| | 15,012 |
| 13,486 |
| | 12,907 |
|
Other intangible assets, net | 74,715 |
| | 77,523 |
| 72,716 |
| | 73,528 |
|
TOTAL ASSETS | $ | 412,418 |
| | $ | 375,581 |
| $ | 415,007 |
| | $ | 423,276 |
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | $ | 32,656 |
| | $ | 19,899 |
| $ | 28,427 |
| | $ | 33,185 |
|
Accrued liabilities | 13,468 |
| | 12,778 |
| 7,651 |
| | 12,314 |
|
Income taxes payable | 1,018 |
| | 3,361 |
| 1,755 |
| | 1,307 |
|
Interest payable | 76 |
| | 111 |
| 106 |
| | 93 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt | 11,367 |
| | 26,415 |
| 24,417 |
| | 18,643 |
|
Total current liabilities | 58,585 |
| | 62,564 |
| 62,356 |
| | 65,542 |
|
Long-term debt, less current portion | 30,184 |
| | 35,690 |
| 23,613 |
| | 25,398 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities, net | 26,048 |
| | 27,575 |
| 23,297 |
| | 25,982 |
|
Total liabilities | 114,817 |
| | 125,829 |
| 109,266 |
| | 116,922 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
| |
|
| |
|
Equity: | | | | | | |
Cumulative convertible preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 100,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | — |
|
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 80,000,000 shares authorized; 60,487,085 shares issued and 53,938,945 shares outstanding at September 30, 2014; 58,265,911 shares issued and 51,804,078 shares outstanding at December 31, 2013 | 6 |
| | 6 |
| |
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 80,000,000 shares authorized; 55,154,224 shares issued and 53,429,599 shares outstanding at March 31, 2015; 54,633,726 shares issued and 53,357,811 shares outstanding at December 31, 2014 | | 6 |
| | 5 |
|
Additional paid-in capital | 283,571 |
| | 266,122 |
| 259,139 |
| | 254,233 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | (397 | ) | | (359 | ) | (742 | ) | | (502 | ) |
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) | 36,489 |
| | (841 | ) | |
Treasury stock, at cost; 5,699,845 and 5,394,178 shares at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively | (22,419 | ) | | (15,176 | ) | |
Flotek Industries, Inc. stockholders' equity | 297,250 |
| | 249,752 |
| |
Retained earnings | | 51,247 |
| | 52,762 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost; 704,350 and 449,397 shares at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively | | (4,267 | ) | | (495 | ) |
Flotek Industries, Inc. stockholders’ equity | | 305,383 |
| | 306,003 |
|
Noncontrolling interests | 351 |
| | — |
| 358 |
| | 351 |
|
Total equity | 297,601 |
| | 249,752 |
| 305,741 |
| | 306,354 |
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | $ | 412,418 |
| | $ | 375,581 |
| $ | 415,007 |
| | $ | 423,276 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share data)
| | | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | Three months ended March 31, |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2013 | 2015 | | 2014 |
Revenue | $ | 116,761 |
| | $ | 98,388 |
| | $ | 324,653 |
| | $ | 270,217 |
| $ | 82,373 |
| | $ | 102,575 |
|
Cost of revenue | 70,683 |
| | 60,886 |
| | 192,585 |
| | 162,491 |
| 55,846 |
| | 58,894 |
|
Gross margin | 46,078 |
| | 37,502 |
| | 132,068 |
| | 107,726 |
| 26,527 |
| | 43,681 |
|
Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | |
Selling, general and administrative | 21,499 |
| | 19,542 |
| | 63,924 |
| | 58,640 |
| 23,888 |
| | 21,572 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 2,439 |
| | 2,038 |
| | 7,225 |
| | 5,231 |
| 2,676 |
| | 2,285 |
|
Research and development | 1,293 |
| | 835 |
| | 3,599 |
| | 2,689 |
| 1,252 |
| | 1,026 |
|
Total expenses | 25,231 |
| | 22,415 |
| | 74,748 |
| | 66,560 |
| 27,816 |
| | 24,883 |
|
Income from operations | 20,847 |
| | 15,087 |
| | 57,320 |
| | 41,166 |
| |
Income (loss) from operations | | (1,289 | ) | | 18,798 |
|
Other income (expense): | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense | (424 | ) | | (530 | ) | | (1,259 | ) | | (1,495 | ) | (407 | ) | | (454 | ) |
Other income (expense), net | (87 | ) | | 59 |
| | (306 | ) | | 117 |
| (225 | ) | | 54 |
|
Total other income (expense) | (511 | ) | | (471 | ) | | (1,565 | ) | | (1,378 | ) | (632 | ) | | (400 | ) |
Income before income taxes | 20,336 |
| | 14,616 |
| | 55,755 |
| | 39,788 |
| |
Income tax expense | (6,064 | ) | | (5,648 | ) | | (18,425 | ) | | (14,615 | ) | |
Net income | $ | 14,272 |
| | $ | 8,968 |
| | $ | 37,330 |
| | $ | 25,173 |
| |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | (1,921 | ) | | 18,398 |
|
Income tax benefit (expense) | | 406 |
| | (6,380 | ) |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (1,515 | ) | | $ | 12,018 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings per common share: | | | | | | | | |
Basic earnings per common share | $ | 0.26 |
| | $ | 0.17 |
| | $ | 0.69 |
| | $ | 0.50 |
| |
Diluted earnings per common share | $ | 0.26 |
| | $ | 0.16 |
| | $ | 0.67 |
| | $ | 0.47 |
| |
Earnings (loss) per common share: | | | | |
Basic earnings (loss) per common share | | $ | (0.03 | ) | | $ | 0.22 |
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share | | $ | (0.03 | ) | | $ | 0.22 |
|
Weighted average common shares: | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average common shares used in computing basic earnings per common share | 54,789 |
| | 52,742 |
| | 54,464 |
| | 50,819 |
| |
Weighted average common shares used in computing diluted earnings per common share | 55,690 |
| | 55,317 |
| | 55,536 |
| | 53,407 |
| |
Weighted average common shares used in computing basic earnings (loss) per common share | | 54,448 |
| | 53,948 |
|
Weighted average common shares used in computing diluted earnings (loss) per common share | | 54,448 |
| | 55,398 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
Net income | $ | 14,272 |
| | $ | 8,968 |
| | $ | 37,330 |
| | $ | 25,173 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | | | |
Foreign currency translation adjustment | (67 | ) | | (22 | ) | | (38 | ) | | (179 | ) |
Unrealized gain on investments available for sale | — |
| | 5 |
| | — |
| | 18 |
|
Comprehensive income | $ | 14,205 |
| | $ | 8,951 |
| | $ | 37,292 |
| | $ | 25,012 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended March 31, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (1,515 | ) | | $ | 12,018 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): | | | | |
Foreign currency translation adjustment | | (240 | ) | | (149 | ) |
Comprehensive income (loss) | | $ | (1,755 | ) | | $ | 11,869 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
| | | Nine months ended September 30, | Three months ended March 31, |
| 2014 | | 2013 | 2015 | | 2014 |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | | |
Net income | $ | 37,330 |
| | $ | 25,173 |
| |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (1,515 | ) | | $ | 12,018 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | 13,276 |
| | 10,948 |
| 4,570 |
| | 4,219 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs | 257 |
| | 65 |
| 86 |
| | 106 |
|
Accretion of debt discount | — |
| | 55 |
| |
Gain on sale of assets | (2,552 | ) | | (3,452 | ) | (1,223 | ) | | (558 | ) |
Stock compensation expense | 7,429 |
| | 8,697 |
| 3,462 |
| | 2,334 |
|
Deferred income tax provision (benefit) | 237 |
| | (315 | ) | |
Deferred income tax benefit | | (2,367 | ) | | (290 | ) |
Excess tax benefit related to share-based awards | (3,425 | ) | | (835 | ) | (87 | ) | | (1,300 | ) |
Changes in current assets and liabilities: | | | | |
Restricted cash | (450 | ) | | 150 |
| |
Changes in current assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions: | | | | |
Accounts receivable, net | (3,896 | ) | | (6,521 | ) | 22,613 |
| | (525 | ) |
Inventories | (18,035 | ) | | (2,055 | ) | (11,990 | ) | | (9,863 | ) |
Other current assets | (4,957 | ) | | 259 |
| 1,782 |
| | 885 |
|
Accounts payable | 12,617 |
| | (17,341 | ) | (4,758 | ) | | 6,700 |
|
Accrued liabilities | 1,019 |
| | 4,931 |
| (4,663 | ) | | (2,531 | ) |
Income taxes payable | 1,082 |
| | 1,585 |
| 535 |
| | 4,322 |
|
Interest payable | (35 | ) | | 16 |
| 13 |
| | (12 | ) |
Net cash provided by operating activities | 39,897 |
| | 21,360 |
| 6,458 |
| | 15,505 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | | |
Capital expenditures | (13,494 | ) | | (9,985 | ) | (5,590 | ) | | (4,115 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of assets | 3,322 |
| | 4,595 |
| 1,315 |
| | 832 |
|
Payments for acquisitions, net of cash acquired | (5,704 | ) | | (53,396 | ) | (1,250 | ) | | (5,286 | ) |
Purchase of patents and other intangible assets | (780 | ) | | — |
| (115 | ) | | (135 | ) |
Net cash used in investing activities | (16,656 | ) | | (58,786 | ) | (5,640 | ) | | (8,704 | ) |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | | |
Repayments of indebtedness | (8,506 | ) | | (9,777 | ) | (4,786 | ) | | (4,786 | ) |
Proceeds of borrowings | — |
| | 26,190 |
| |
Borrowings on revolving credit facility | 305,750 |
| | 231,696 |
| 112,151 |
| | 96,750 |
|
Repayments on revolving credit facility | (317,798 | ) | | (204,319 | ) | (103,376 | ) | | (99,097 | ) |
Debt issuance costs | (256 | ) | | (1,207 | ) | — |
| | (59 | ) |
Issuance costs of preferred stock and detachable warrants | — |
| | (200 | ) | |
Excess tax benefit related to share-based awards | 3,425 |
| | 835 |
| 87 |
| | 1,300 |
|
Acquisition of treasury stock related to share-based awards | (6,060 | ) | | (5,325 | ) | |
Purchase of treasury stock related to share-based awards | | (1,055 | ) | | (4,045 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of common stock | 763 |
| | 567 |
| 256 |
| | 231 |
|
Repurchase of common stock | | (2,651 | ) | | — |
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | 461 |
| | 491 |
| 22 |
| | 443 |
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock warrants | 1,545 |
| | 323 |
| — |
| | 1,545 |
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (20,676 | ) | | 39,274 |
| |
Proceeds from noncontrolling interest | | 7 |
| | — |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | 655 |
| | (7,718 | ) |
Effect of changes in exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents | (38 | ) | | (179 | ) | (240 | ) | | (149 | ) |
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | 2,527 |
| | 1,669 |
| |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | 1,233 |
| | (1,066 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period | 2,730 |
| | 2,700 |
| 1,266 |
| | 2,730 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period | $ | 5,257 |
| | $ | 4,369 |
| $ | 2,499 |
| | $ | 1,664 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY
(in thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Common Stock | | Treasury Stock | | Additional Paid-in Capital | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | | Retained Earnings(Accumulated Deficit) | | Non-controlling Interests | | Total Equity |
| Shares Issued | | Par Value | | Shares | | Cost | |
Balance, December 31, 2013 | 58,266 |
| | $ | 6 |
| | 5,394 |
| | $ | (15,176 | ) | | $ | 266,122 |
| | $ | (359 | ) | | $ | (841 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 249,752 |
|
Net income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 37,330 |
| | — |
| | 37,330 |
|
Other comprehensive income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (38 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (38 | ) |
Common stock issued under employee stock purchase plan | — |
| | — |
| | (27 | ) | | — |
| | 763 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 763 |
|
Common stock issued in payment of accrued liability | 27 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 600 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 600 |
|
Stock warrants exercised | 1,277 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,545 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,545 |
|
Stock options exercised | 302 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,644 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,644 |
|
Stock surrendered for exercise of stock options | — |
| | — |
| | 46 |
| | (1,183 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1,183 | ) |
Restricted stock granted | 516 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Restricted stock forfeited | — |
| | — |
| | 55 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Treasury stock acquired related to tax withholding for share-based awards | — |
| | — |
| | 232 |
| | (6,060 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (6,060 | ) |
Excess tax benefit related to share- based awards | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,425 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,425 |
|
Stock compensation expense | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 7,429 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 7,429 |
|
Investment in Flotek Gulf, LLC and Flotek Gulf Research, LLC | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 351 |
| | 351 |
|
Stock issued in EOGA acquisition | 94 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,894 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,894 |
|
Stock issued in SiteLark acquisition | 5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 149 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 149 |
|
Balance, September 30, 2014 | 60,487 |
| | $ | 6 |
| | 5,700 |
| | $ | (22,419 | ) | | $ | 283,571 |
| | $ | (397 | ) | | $ | 36,489 |
| | $ | 351 |
| | $ | 297,601 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Common Stock | | Treasury Stock | | Additional Paid-in Capital | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | | Retained Earnings | | Non-controlling Interests | | Total Equity |
| Shares Issued | | Par Value | | Shares | | Cost | |
Balance, December 31, 2014 | 54,634 |
| | $ | 5 |
| | 449 |
| | $ | (495 | ) | | $ | 254,233 |
| | $ | (502 | ) | | $ | 52,762 |
| | $ | 351 |
| | $ | 306,354 |
|
Net income (loss) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1,515 | ) | | — |
| | (1,515 | ) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (240 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (240 | ) |
Stock issued under employee stock purchase plan | — |
| | — |
| | (18 | ) | | — |
| | 256 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 256 |
|
Stock options exercised | 35 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 88 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 88 |
|
Stock surrendered for exercise of stock options | — |
| | — |
| | 4 |
| | (66 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (66 | ) |
Restricted stock granted | 425 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Restricted stock forfeited | — |
| | — |
| | 7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Treasury stock purchased | — |
| | — |
| | 82 |
| | (1,055 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1,055 | ) |
Stock compensation expense | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,462 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,462 |
|
Excess tax benefit related to share-based awards | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 87 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 87 |
|
Investment in Flotek Gulf, LLC and Flotek Gulf Research, LLC | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 7 |
| | 7 |
|
Stock issued in IAL acquisition | 60 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,014 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,014 |
|
Repurchase of common stock | — |
| | — |
| | 180 |
| | (2,651 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (2,651 | ) |
Balance, March 31, 2015 | 55,154 |
| | $ | 6 |
| | 704 |
| | $ | (4,267 | ) | | $ | 259,139 |
| | $ | (742 | ) | | $ | 51,247 |
| | $ | 358 |
| | $ | 305,741 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
7
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 — Organization and Significant Accounting Policies
Organization and Nature of Operations
Flotek Industries, Inc. (“Flotek” or the “Company”) is a global, diversified, technology-driven supplier of energy chemicalschemistries and consumer and industrial chemicalschemistries and is a global developer and supplier of drilling, completion and production technologies and related services.
Flotek'sFlotek’s strategic focus, and that of its diversified wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively referred to as the “Company”), includes energy-related chemicalenergy related chemistry technologies, drilling technologies,and production technologies, (previously referred to as artificial lift technologies), and consumer and industrial chemicalchemistry technologies. Within energy technologies, the Company provides oilfield specialty chemicalschemistries and logistics, down-holedownhole drilling tools and production-relatedproduction related tools used in the energy and mining industries. Flotek'sFlotek’s products and services enable customers to drill wells more efficiently, to realize increased production from both new and existing wells and to decrease future well operating costs. Major customers include leading oilfield service providers, pressure-pumping service companies, onshore and offshore drilling contractors, and major and independent oil and gas exploration and production companies. Within consumer and industrial chemicalchemistry technologies, the Company provides products for the flavor and fragrance industry and the industrial chemical industry. Major customers include food and beverage companies, fragrance companies, and companies providing household and industrial cleaning products.
The Company is headquartered in Houston, Texas, with operating locations in Colorado, Florida, Louisiana, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Colorado, Pennsylvania, Texas, Utah, Wyoming, Canada, the Netherlands and the Middle East. Flotek’s products are marketed both domestically and internationally, with international presence and/or representationinitiatives in over 20 countries.
Flotek was initially incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia on May 17, 1985. On October 23, 2001, Flotek changed its corporate domicile to the state of Delaware.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying footnotes (collectively the “Financial Statements”) reflect all adjustments, in the opinion of management, necessary for fair presentation of the financial condition and results of operations for the periods presented. All such adjustments are normal and recurring in nature. The Financial Statements, including selected notes, have been prepared in accordance with applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) regarding interim financial reporting and do not include all information and disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for comprehensive financial statement reporting. These interim Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20132014 (the “Annual Report”). A copy of the Annual Report is available on the SEC’s website, www.sec.gov, under the Company’s ticker symbol (“FTK”) or on Flotek’s website, www.flotekind.com. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014March 31, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2014.
Omani Entities
In November 2013, the Company signed shareholder agreements with Tasneea Oil and Gas Technologies, LLC (“Tasneea”), an Omani Limited Liability Company, to form Omani based Flotek Gulf, LLC (“Flotek Gulf”) and Flotek Gulf Research, LLC (“Flotek Gulf Research”). Flotek will own 55% of the outstanding shares and Tasneea will own 45% of the outstanding shares of both Flotek Gulf and Flotek Gulf Research. During September 2014, Flotek and Tasneea transferred initial capital of $0.4 million to form Flotek Gulf and $0.4 million to form Flotek Gulf Research. At September 30, 2014, the total initial capital transfers of $0.8 million are reported as restricted cash.2015.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and reported amounts of revenue and expenses. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. The reclassifications did not impact net income.
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 2 — Recent Accounting Pronouncements
(a) Application of New Accounting Standards
Effective January 1, 2014,2015, the Company adopted the accounting guidance in Accounting Standards Update ("ASU"(“ASU”) No. 2013-11, 2014-08, “"Presentation of Financial Statements and Property, Plant, and Equipment - Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists,"Entity,” which provides guidanceamends the definition of a discontinued operation by raising the threshold for reporting unrecognized tax benefits when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists atdisposal to qualify as discontinued operations. The ASU will also require entities to provide additional disclosures about discontinued operations as well as disposal transactions that do not meet the reporting date. The guidance requires an unrecognized tax benefit to be presented as a decrease in a deferred tax asset where a net operating loss, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists and certain criteria are met.discontinued operations criteria. Implementation of this standard did not have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
(b) New Accounting Requirements and Disclosures
In June 2014,Effective January 1, 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issuedCompany adopted the accounting guidance in ASU No. 2014-12, “ "AccountingAccounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period."” The ASU requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluatingImplementation of this standard did not have a material effect on the potential impacts ofconsolidated financial statements or the new standard onCompany's current awards under its existing stock-based compensation plans.
(b) New Accounting Requirements and Disclosures
In May 2014, the FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2014-09, "“Revenue from Contracts with Customers."” The ASU will supersede most of the existing revenue recognition requirements in U.S. GAAP and will require entities to recognize revenue at an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring goods or services to a customer. The new standard also requires significantly expanded disclosures regarding the qualitative and quantitative information of an entity'sentity’s nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The pronouncement is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period and is to be applied retrospectively, with early application not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the pronouncement will have on the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In April 2014,January 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08, 2015-01, “"Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Financial StatementsExtraordinary Items.” This ASU eliminates from generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) the concept of extraordinary items and Property, Plant,the need for an entity to separately classify, present, and Equipment - Reporting Discontinued Operationsdisclose extraordinary events and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity," which amends the definition of a discontinued operation by raising the thresholdtransactions, while retaining certain presentation and disclosure guidance for a disposal to qualify as discontinued operations. The ASU will also require entities to provide additional disclosures about discontinued operations as well as disposal transactionsitems that do not meet the discontinued operations criteria.are unusual in nature or occur infrequently. The pronouncement is effective prospectively for all disposals (except disposals classified as held for sale before the adoption date) of components initially classified as held for sale inannual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014. Early adoption is2015, including interim periods within that reporting period and may be applied retrospectively, with early application permitted. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance and does not expect that adoptionthe impact the pronouncement will have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.statements and related disclosures.
In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-02, “Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis.” The amendment eliminates the deferral of certain consolidation standards for entities considered to be investment companies and modifies the consolidation analysis performed on certain types of legal entities. The pronouncement is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within that reporting period and may be applied retrospectively, with early application permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the pronouncement will have on the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs.” The accounting guidance requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be reported on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability. The pronouncement is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within that reporting period with early application permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the pronouncement will have on the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 3 — Acquisitions
On January 1, 2014,27, 2015, the Company acquired 100% of the membership interests in Eclipse IOR Services,assets of International Artificial Lift, LLC ("EOGA"), a leading Enhanced Oil Recovery ("EOR"(“IAL”) design and injection firm, for $6.4$1.3 million in cash consideration and 94,35460,024 shares of the Company's Common Stock. EOGA’s enhancedCompany’s common stock. IAL is a development-stage company that specializes in the design, manufacturing and service of next-generation hydraulic pumping units that serve to increase and maximize production for oil recovery processes and its use of polymers to improve the performance of EOR projects has been combined with the Company’s existing EOR products and services.natural gas wells.
On April 1, 2014, the Company acquired 100% of the membership interests in SiteLark, LLC ("SiteLark"(“SiteLark”) for $0.4 million in cash and 5,327 shares of the Company'sCompany’s common stock. SiteLark provides reservoir engineering and modeling services for a variety of hydrocarbon applications. Its services include proprietary software which assists engineers with reservoir simulation, reservoir engineering and waterflood optimization.
As discussed in more detail in the Company's 2013 Annual Report,On January 1, 2014, the Company acquired Florida Chemical Company, Inc. ("Florida Chemical") on May 10, 2013 for a total purchase price of $106.4 million. Florida Chemical is one100% of the world's largest processorsmembership interests in Eclipse IOR Services, LLC (“EOGA”), a leading Enhanced Oil Recovery (“EOR”) design and injection firm, for $5.3 million in cash consideration, net of citrus oilscash received, and a pioneer in solvent, chemical synthesis,94,354 shares of the Company’s Common Stock. EOGA’s enhanced oil recovery processes and flavor and fragrance applications from citrus oils. Florida Chemicalits use of polymers to improve the performance of EOR projects has been an innovator in creating high performance, bio-basedcombined with the Company’s existing EOR products for a variety of industries, including applications in the oil and gas industry. This acquisition brings a portfolio of high performance renewable and sustainable chemistries that perform well in the oil and gas industry as well as non-energy related markets. This acquisition expands the Company's business into consumer and industrial chemical technologies which provide products for the flavor and fragrance industry and the specialty chemical industry. These technologies are used by food and beverage companies, fragrance companies, and companies providing household and industrial cleaning products.
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
During the three months ended September 30, 2014, the Company identified and recorded a final adjustment related to the acquisition of Florida Chemical. Current deferred tax assets were increased by $1.2 million with a corresponding decrease to goodwill within the consumer and industrial chemical technologies reporting unit. This final adjustment was not significant relative to the total consideration paid for Florida Chemical and, therefore, the final adjustment has not been retrospectively applied to the Company's balance sheet as of December 31, 2013. This adjustment, if recorded in 2013, would have had no impact on the 2013 consolidated statements of operations and cash flows.services.
Note 4 — Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Supplemental cash flow information is as follows (in thousands): | | | Nine months ended September 30, | Three months ended March 31, |
| 2014 | | 2013 | 2015 | | 2014 |
Supplemental non-cash investing and financing activities: | | | | | | |
Value of common stock issued in acquisitions | $ | 2,043 |
| | $ | 52,711 |
| $ | 1,014 |
| | $ | 1,750 |
|
Final Florida Chemical acquisition adjustment | 1,162 |
| | — |
| |
Value of common stock issued in payment of accrued liability | 600 |
| | — |
| — |
| | 600 |
|
Equipment acquired through capital leases | — |
| | 866 |
| |
Exercise of stock options by common stock surrender | 1,183 |
| | 2,979 |
| 66 |
| | 1,005 |
|
Supplemental cash payment information: | | | | | | |
Interest paid | $ | 1,038 |
| | $ | 1,410 |
| $ | 309 |
| | $ | 360 |
|
Income taxes paid | 18,393 |
| | 13,343 |
| 1,911 |
| | 2,039 |
|
Note 5 — Revenue
The Company differentiates revenue and cost of revenue based on whether the source of revenue is attributable to products, rentals or services. Revenue and cost of revenue by source are as follows (in thousands):
| | | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | | Three months ended March 31, |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
Revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Products | $ | 92,708 |
| | $ | 76,376 |
| | $ | 257,415 |
| | $ | 204,229 |
| | $ | 66,160 |
| | $ | 82,406 |
|
Rentals | 16,966 |
| | 15,375 |
| | 45,954 |
| | 46,794 |
| | 11,824 |
| | 13,923 |
|
Services | 7,087 |
| | 6,637 |
| | 21,284 |
| | 19,194 |
| | 4,389 |
| | 6,246 |
|
| $ | 116,761 |
| | $ | 98,388 |
| | $ | 324,653 |
| | $ | 270,217 |
| | $ | 82,373 |
| | $ | 102,575 |
|
Cost of revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Products | $ | 57,315 |
| | $ | 50,367 |
| | $ | 155,048 |
| | $ | 131,875 |
| | $ | 45,624 |
| | $ | 47,732 |
|
Rentals | 8,272 |
| | 6,868 |
| | 22,444 |
| | 17,666 |
| | 6,285 |
| | 6,513 |
|
Services | 3,074 |
| | 1,610 |
| | 9,042 |
| | 7,179 |
| | 2,042 |
| | 2,715 |
|
Depreciation | 2,022 |
| | 2,041 |
| | 6,051 |
| | 5,771 |
| | 1,895 |
| | 1,934 |
|
| $ | 70,683 |
| | $ | 60,886 |
| | $ | 192,585 |
| | $ | 162,491 |
| | $ | 55,846 |
| | $ | 58,894 |
|
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 6 — Inventories
Inventories are as follows (in thousands): | | | September 30, 2014 | | December 31, 2013 | March 31, 2015 | | December 31, 2014 |
Raw materials | $ | 29,681 |
| | $ | 13,953 |
| $ | 55,492 |
| | $ | 31,581 |
|
Work-in-process | 2,880 |
| | 1,904 |
| 3,211 |
| | 3,129 |
|
Finished goods | 51,026 |
| | 50,019 |
| 39,459 |
| | 51,248 |
|
Inventories | 83,587 |
| | 65,876 |
| $ | 98,162 |
| | $ | 85,958 |
|
Less reserve for excess and obsolete inventory | (2,148 | ) | | (2,744 | ) | |
Inventories, net | $ | 81,439 |
| | $ | 63,132 |
| |
Note 7 — Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are as follows (in thousands): | | | | September 30, 2014 | | December 31, 2013 | | March 31, 2015 | | December 31, 2014 |
Land | | $ | 5,852 |
| | $ | 5,088 |
| | $ | 7,122 |
| | $ | 6,780 |
|
Buildings and leasehold improvements | | 32,695 |
| | 32,269 |
| | 33,933 |
| | 33,765 |
|
Machinery, equipment and rental tools | | 78,839 |
| | 71,073 |
| | 85,108 |
| | 80,731 |
|
Equipment in progress | | 6,771 |
| | 4,601 |
| | 4,429 |
| | 7,299 |
|
Furniture and fixtures | | 2,499 |
| | 2,400 |
| | 2,619 |
| | 2,528 |
|
Transportation equipment | | 6,168 |
| | 6,340 |
| | 6,959 |
| | 6,566 |
|
Computer equipment and software | | 7,513 |
| | 7,617 |
| | 10,322 |
| | 7,605 |
|
Property and equipment | | 140,337 |
| | 129,388 |
| | 150,492 |
| | 145,274 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation | | (57,067 | ) | | (50,274 | ) | | (62,253 | ) | | (59,163 | ) |
Property and equipment, net | | $ | 83,270 |
| | $ | 79,114 |
| | $ | 88,239 |
| | $ | 86,111 |
|
Depreciation expense, including expense recorded in cost of revenue, totaled $3.3$3.4 million and $3.0 million for the three months ended September 30,March 31, 2015 and 2014, and 2013, respectively, and $9.7 million and $8.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Note 8 — Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
During the ninethree months ended September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015, the Company recognized $6.0$1.7 million of goodwill within the Energy ChemicalProduction Technologies reporting unit in connection with the acquisitions of EOGA and SiteLark. During the three months ended September 30, 2014, the Company recorded a final adjustment related to the acquisition of Florida Chemical (see Note 3).IAL. There were no impairments of goodwill recognized during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013.March 31, 2015.
Changes in the carrying value of goodwill for each reporting unit are as follows (in thousands): |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Energy Chemical Technologies | | Consumer and Industrial Chemical Technologies | | Teledrift® | | Total |
Balance at December 31, 2013 | $ | 30,296 |
| | $ | 20,642 |
| | $ | 15,333 |
| | $ | 66,271 |
|
Final Florida Chemical acquisition adjustment | — |
| | (1,162 | ) | | — |
| | (1,162 | ) |
Addition upon acquisition of EOGA | 5,455 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5,455 |
|
Addition upon acquisition of SiteLark | 567 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 567 |
|
Balance at September 30, 2014 | $ | 36,318 |
| | $ | 19,480 |
| | $ | 15,333 |
| | $ | 71,131 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Energy Chemistry Technologies | | Consumer and Industrial Chemistry Technologies | | Teledrift® | | Production Technologies | | Total |
Balance at December 31, 2014 | $ | 36,318 |
| | $ | 19,480 |
| | $ | 15,333 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 71,131 |
|
Addition upon acquisition of IAL | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,689 |
| | 1,689 |
|
Balance at March 31, 2015 | $ | 36,318 |
| | $ | 19,480 |
| | $ | 15,333 |
| | $ | 1,689 |
| | $ | 72,820 |
|
Finite lived intangible assets acquired are amortized on a straight-line basis over two to 20 years. Amortization of finite lived intangible assets acquired totaled $1.2 million and $1.3$1.2 million for the three months ended September 30,March 31, 2015 and 2014, and 2013, respectively, and $3.6respectively.
Amortization of deferred financing costs was $0.1 million and $2.7$0.1 million for the ninethree months ended September 30,March 31, 2015 and 2014, and 2013, respectively.
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Amortization of deferred financing costs was $0.1 million and $0.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively. Amortization of deferred financing costs was not significant for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013.
Note 9 — Long-Term Debt and Credit Facility
Long-term debt is as follows (in thousands): | | | September 30, 2014 | | December 31, 2013 | March 31, 2015 | | December 31, 2014 |
Long-term debt: | | | | | | |
Borrowings under revolving credit facility | | $ | 17,274 |
| | $ | 8,500 |
|
Term loan | $ | 37,327 |
| | $ | 45,833 |
| 30,756 |
| | 35,541 |
|
Borrowings under revolving credit facility | 4,224 |
| | 16,272 |
| |
Total long-term debt | 41,551 |
| | 62,105 |
| 48,030 |
| | 44,041 |
|
Less current portion of long-term debt | (11,367 | ) | | (26,415 | ) | (24,417 | ) | | (18,643 | ) |
Long-term debt, less current portion | $ | 30,184 |
| | $ | 35,690 |
| $ | 23,613 |
| | $ | 25,398 |
|
Credit Facility
On May 10, 2013, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries (the “Borrowers”) entered into an Amended and Restated Revolving Credit, Term Loan and Security Agreement (the “Credit Facility”) with PNC Bank, National Association (“PNC Bank”). The Company may borrow under the Credit Facility for working capital, permitted acquisitions, capital expenditures and other corporate purposes. Under terms of the Credit Facility, as amended, on December 31, 2013, the Company (a) may borrow up to $75 million under a revolving credit facility and (b) has borrowed $50 million under a term loan.
The Credit Facility is secured by substantially all of the Company'sCompany’s domestic real and personal property, including accounts receivable, inventory, land, buildings, equipment and other intangible assets. The Credit Facility contains customary representations, warranties, and both affirmative and negative covenants, including a financial covenant to maintain a consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) to debt ratio of 1.10 to 1.00, a financial covenant to maintain a ratio of funded debt to adjusted EBITDA of not greater than 4.0 to 1.0, and an annual limit on capital expenditures of approximately $36$34 million. The Credit Facility restricts the payment of cash dividends on common stock. In the event of default, PNC Bank may accelerate the maturity date of any outstanding amounts borrowed under the Credit Facility.
The Credit Facility includes a provision that 25% of EBITDA minus cash paid for taxes, dividends, debt payments and unfunded capital expenditures, not to exceed $3.0 million for any year, be paid within 60 days of the fiscal year end. For the year ended December 31, 2013,2014, the excess cash flow exceeded $3.0 million. Consequently, the Company paid $3.0 million on its term loan balance to PNC Bank on March 3, 2014.2, 2015. This amount is classified as current debt at December 31, 2013.2014.
Each of the Company’s domestic subsidiaries is fully obligated for Credit Facility indebtedness as a Borrowerborrower or as a guarantor.
(a) Revolving Credit Facility
Under the revolving credit facility, the Company may borrow up to $75 million through May 10, 2018. This includes a sublimit of $10 million that may be used for letters of credit. The revolving credit facility is secured by substantially all of the Company'sCompany’s domestic accounts receivable and inventory.
At September 30, 2014March 31, 2015, eligible accounts receivable and inventory securing the revolving credit facility provided availability of $74.8 million under the revolving credit facility. Available borrowing capacity, net of outstanding borrowings, was $70.6$57.5 million at September 30, 2014March 31, 2015.
The interest rate on advances under the revolving credit facility varies based on the level of borrowing.borrowing under the Credit Facility. Rates range (a) between PNC Bank'sBank’s base lending rate plus 0.5% to 1.0% or (b) between the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 1.5% to 2.0%. PNC Bank'sBank’s base lending rate was 3.25% at September 30, 2014March 31, 2015. The Company is required to pay a monthly facility fee of 0.25% per annum, on any unused amount under the commitment based on daily averages. At September 30, 2014March 31, 2015, $4.2$17.3 million was outstanding under the revolving credit facility, with $0.2$6.3 million borrowed as base rate loans at an interest rate of 3.75% and $4.0$11.0 million borrowed as LIBOR loans at an interest rate of 1.66%1.68%.
Borrowing under the revolving credit agreementfacility is classified as current debt as a result of the required lockbox arrangement and the subjective acceleration clause.
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(b) Term Loan
The Company increased borrowing to $50 million under the term loan on May 10, 2013. Monthly principal payments of $0.6 million are required. The unpaid balance of the term loan is due May 10, 2018. Prepayments are permitted, and may be required
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
in certain circumstances. Amounts repaid under the term loan may not be reborrowed. The term loan is secured by substantially all of the Company'sCompany’s domestic land, buildings, equipment and other intangible assets.
The interest rate on the term loan varies based on the level of borrowing under the revolving credit facility.Credit Facility. Rates range (a) between PNC Bank'sBank’s base lending rate plus 1.25% to 1.75% or (b) between LIBOR plus 2.25% to 2.75%. At September 30, 2014March 31, 2015, $37.3$30.8 million was outstanding under the term loan, with $0.3$0.8 million borrowed as base rate loans at an interest rate of 4.50% and $37.0$30.0 million borrowed as LIBOR loans at an interest rate of 2.41%2.43%.
Convertible Notes
The Company’s convertible notes have consisted of Convertible Senior Unsecured Notes (“2008 Notes”) and Convertible Senior Secured Notes (“2010 Notes”). On February 15, 2013, the Company repurchased the remaining $5.2 million of outstanding 2008 Notes for cash equal to the original principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. These 2008 Notes were either tendered by the holder pursuant to the Company's tender offer or were redeemed by the Company pursuant to provisions of the indenture for the 2008 Notes. Following this repurchase, the Company no longer has any outstanding convertible senior notes.
Share Lending Agreement
Concurrent with the offering of the 2008 Notes, the Company entered into a share lending agreement (the “Share Lending Agreement”) with Bear, Stearns International Limited which was subsequently acquired and became an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase & Company (the “Borrower”). In accordance with the Share Lending Agreement, the Company loaned 3.8 million shares of its common stock (the “Borrowed Shares”) to the Borrower for a period commencing February 11, 2008 and ending on the earlier of February 15, 2028 or the date the 2008 Notes were paid. The Borrower was permitted to use the Borrowed Shares only for the purpose of directly or indirectly facilitating the sale of the 2008 Notes and for the establishment of hedge positions by holders of the 2008 Notes. The Company did not require collateral to mitigate any inherent or associated risk of the Share Lending Agreement.
The Company did not receive any proceeds for the Borrowed Shares, but did receive a nominal loan fee of $0.0001 for each share loaned. The Borrower retained all proceeds from sales of Borrowed Shares pursuant to the Share Lending Agreement. Upon conversion or replacement of the 2008 Notes, the number of Borrowed Shares proportionate to the converted or repaid notes were to be returned to the Company. The Borrowed Shares were issued and outstanding for corporate law purposes. Accordingly, holders of Borrowed Shares possessed all of the rights of a holder of the Company’s outstanding shares, including the right to vote the shares on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders and the right to receive any dividends or other distributions declared or paid on outstanding shares of common stock. Under the Share Lending Agreement, the Borrower agreed to pay to the Company, within one business day after a payment date, an amount equal to any cash dividends that the Company paid on the Borrowed Shares, and to pay or deliver to the Company, upon termination of the loan of Borrowed Shares, any other distribution, in liquidation or otherwise, that the Company made on the Borrowed Shares.
To the extent the Borrowed Shares loaned under the Share Lending Agreement were not sold or returned to the Company, the Borrower agreed to not vote any borrowed shares of which the Borrower was the owner of record. The Borrower also agreed, under the Share Lending Agreement, to not transfer or dispose of any borrowed shares unless such transfer or disposition was pursuant to a registration statement that was effective under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Investors that purchased shares from the Borrower, and all subsequent transferees of such purchasers, were entitled to the same voting rights, with respect to owned shares, as any other holder of common stock.
During 2011 and 2012, the Borrower returned 1,360,442 shares of the Company’s borrowed common stock. On January 22, 2013, the remaining 2,439,558 shares of the Company's common stock held by J.P. Morgan Markets Limited were returned to the Company. No consideration was paid by the Company for the return of the Borrowed Shares. The Share Lending Agreement has been terminated.
Shares that had been loaned under the Share Lending Agreement were not considered outstanding for the purpose of computing and reporting earnings per share.
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 10 — Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Basic earnings (loss) per common share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per common share is calculated by dividing net income adjusted for the effect of assumed conversion of convertible notes,(loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding combined with dilutive common share equivalents outstanding, if the effect is dilutive.
In connection with the sale of the 2008 Notes, the Company entered into a Share Lending Agreement for 3.8 million shares of the Company’s common stock (see Note 9). Contractual undertakings of the Borrower had the effect of substantially eliminating the economic dilution that otherwise would result from the issuance of the Borrowed Shares, and all shares outstanding under the Share Lending Agreement were contractually obligated to be returned to the Company. As a result, shares loaned under the Share Lending Agreement were not considered outstanding for the purpose of computing and reporting earnings per share. The Share Lending Agreement was terminated on January 22, 2013 upon the return of all Borrowed Shares to the Company.
On February 15, 2013, the Company repurchased the remaining $5.2 million of outstanding 2008 Notes for cash. Following this repurchase, the Company no longer has any outstanding convertible senior notes. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company’s convertible notesPotentially dilutive securities were excluded from the calculation of diluted earningsearning (loss) per common share as inclusion was anti-dilutive. In addition, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, approximately 0.1March 31, 2015, since including them would have an anti-dilutive effect on earnings (loss) per share due to the net loss incurred during the period. Securities convertible into shares of common stock that were not considered in the diluted earnings (loss) per share calculation were 1.5 million stock options with an exercise price in excess of the average market price of the Company’s commonand 0.4 million restricted stock were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per common share.units.
Basic and diluted earnings per common share are as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
| | | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | | Three months ended March 31, |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
Net income - Basic and Diluted | $ | 14,272 |
| | $ | 8,968 |
| | $ | 37,330 |
| | $ | 25,173 |
| |
Net income (loss) - Basic and Diluted | | | $ | (1,515 | ) | | $ | 12,018 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding - Basic | 54,789 |
| | 52,742 |
| | 54,464 |
| | 50,819 |
| | 54,448 |
| | 53,948 |
|
Assumed conversions: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Incremental common shares from warrants | — |
| | 1,365 |
| | 162 |
| | 1,404 |
| |
Incremental common shares from stock warrants | | | — |
| | 486 |
|
Incremental common shares from stock options | 867 |
| | 1,134 |
| | 901 |
| | 1,143 |
| | — |
| | 949 |
|
Incremental common shares from restricted stock units | 34 |
| | 76 |
| | 9 |
| | 41 |
| | — |
| | 15 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding - Diluted | 55,690 |
| | 55,317 |
| | 55,536 |
| | 53,407 |
| | 54,448 |
| | 55,398 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic earnings per common share | $ | 0.26 |
| | $ | 0.17 |
| | $ | 0.69 |
| | $ | 0.50 |
| |
Diluted earnings per common share | $ | 0.26 |
| | $ | 0.16 |
| | $ | 0.67 |
| | $ | 0.47 |
| |
Basic earnings (loss) per common share | | | $ | (0.03 | ) | | $ | 0.22 |
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share | | | $ | (0.03 | ) | | $ | 0.22 |
|
Note 11 — Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is defined as the amount that would be received for selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Company categorizes financial assets and liabilities into the three levels of the fair value hierarchy. The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value and bases categorization within the hierarchy on the lowest level of input that is available and significant to the fair value measurement.
Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and
Level 3 — Significant unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity or that are based on the reporting entity’s assumptions about the inputs.
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Fair Value of Other Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of certain financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these accounts. The Company had no cash equivalents at September 30, 2014March 31, 2015 or December 31, 2013.2014.
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The carrying value and estimated fair value of the Company’s long-term debt are as follows (in thousands):
| | | September 30, 2014 | | December 31, 2013 | March 31, 2015 | | December 31, 2014 |
| Carrying Value | | Fair Value | | Carrying Value | | Fair Value | Carrying Value | | Fair Value | | Carrying Value | | Fair Value |
Term loan | $ | 37,327 |
| | $ | 37,327 |
| | $ | 45,833 |
| | $ | 45,833 |
| $ | 30,756 |
| | $ | 30,756 |
| | $ | 35,541 |
| | $ | 35,541 |
|
Borrowings under revolving credit facility | 4,224 |
| | 4,224 |
| | 16,272 |
| | 16,272 |
| 17,274 |
| | 17,274 |
| | 8,500 |
| | 8,500 |
|
The carrying value of the term loan and borrowings under the revolving credit facility approximate their fair value because the interest rates are variable.
Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
The Company'sCompany’s non-financial assets, including property and equipment, goodwill and other intangible assets are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and are subject to fair value adjustment in certain circumstances. No impairment of any of these assets was recognized during the ninethree months ended September 30,March 31, 2015 and 2014 and 2013.
Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
At September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, no liabilities were required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. There were no transfers in or out of either Level 1 or Level 2 fair value measurements during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2013. During the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2013, there were no transfers in or out of the Level 3 hierarchy.
Note 12 — Income Taxes
The Company’s corporate organizational structure requires the filing of two separate consolidated U.S. Federal income tax returns. Taxable income of one group cannot be offset by tax attributes, including net operating losses, of the other group.
A reconciliation of the effective tax rate to the U.S. federal statutory tax rate is as follows:
| | | Three months ended September 30, |
| Nine months ended September 30, |
| Three months ended March 31, |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
Federal statutory tax rate | 35.0 | % | | 35.0 | % | | 35.0 | % | | 35.0 | % | | 35.0 | % | | 35.0 | % |
State income taxes, net of federal benefit | 1.8 |
| | 3.6 |
| | 2.1 |
| | 3.2 |
| | 5.4 |
| | 2.3 |
|
Return to accrual adjustments | (4.9 | ) | | 1.1 |
| | (1.8 | ) | | 0.4 |
| |
Non-US income taxed at different rates | | | (23.6 | ) | | — |
|
Non-deductible expenses | | | 5.4 |
| | 0.1 |
|
Domestic production activities deduction | (1.9 | ) | | (2.3 | ) | | (2.4 | ) | | (2.4 | ) | | (1.1 | ) | | (2.7 | ) |
Other | (0.2 | ) | | 1.2 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.5 |
| |
Effective income tax rate | 29.8 | % | | 38.6 | % | | 33.0 | % | | 36.7 | % | | 21.1 | % | | 34.7 | % |
FluctuationsThe decline in the effective tax rates were historically impacted by permanent tax differences with no associated income tax impact and existing deferred tax asset valuation allowances. The return to accrual adjustmentsrate for the three and nine months ended September 30,March 31, 2015, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2014, includewas primarily due to the effectmix of a decrease in deferred tax liabilities relatedpre-tax profit and loss between domestic and international taxing jurisdictions. The Company plans to a change in state tax apportionment.permanently reinvest profits from international operations into opportunities to expand the Company’s international presence.
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Deferred taxes are presented in the balance sheets as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2014 | | December 31, 2013 |
Current deferred tax assets | | $ | 2,840 |
| | $ | 2,522 |
|
Non-current deferred tax assets | | 14,090 |
| | 15,012 |
|
Non-current deferred tax liabilities | | (26,048 | ) | | (27,575 | ) |
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) | | $ | (9,118 | ) | | $ | (10,041 | ) |
During the three months ended September 30, 2014, the Company recorded a final adjustment related to the acquisition of Florida Chemical that increased current deferred tax assets by $1.2 million (see Note 3). |
| | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2015 | | December 31, 2014 |
Current deferred tax assets | | $ | 1,799 |
| | $ | 2,696 |
|
Non-current deferred tax assets | | 13,486 |
| | 12,907 |
|
Non-current deferred tax liabilities | | (23,297 | ) | | (25,982 | ) |
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) | | $ | (8,012 | ) | | $ | (10,379 | ) |
Note 13 — Convertible Preferred Stock and Stock Warrants
In August 2009, the Company sold 16,000 units (the “Units”), consisting of preferred stock and warrants for $1,000 per Unit. Each Unit consisted of one share of Series A cumulative convertible preferred stock (“Convertible Preferred Stock”),with detachable warrants to purchase up to 155 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $2.31 per share (“Exercisable Warrants”) and detachable contingent warrants to purchase up to 500 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $2.45 per share (“Contingent Warrants”).
Preferred Stock
Each share of Convertible Preferred Stock was convertible at any time, at the holder’s option, into 434.782 shares of the Company’s common stock. The conversion rate represented an equivalent conversion price of approximately $2.30 per share of common stock.
Each share of Convertible Preferred Stock had a liquidation preference of $1,000. Dividends accrued at a rate of 15% of the liquidation preference per year and accumulated, if not paid quarterly. Subsequent to February 11, 2010, the Company had the ability to convert the preferred shares into common shares if the closing price of the common stock met certain price criteria. In the event any Convertible Preferred Stock was converted, the Company was obligated to pay an amount, in cash or common stock, equal to eight quarterly dividend payments less any dividends previously paid.
In February 2011, the Company exercised its contractual right to mandatorily convert all outstanding shares of Convertible Preferred Stockconvertible preferred stock into shares of common stock at the prevailing conversion rate of 434.782 shares of common stock for each share of preferred stock. Currently, the Company has no issued or outstanding shares of preferred stock.
Stock Warrants
Exercisable Warrants were exercisable upon issuance and expire August 12, 2014, if not exercised. Contingent Warrants became exercisable on November 9, 2009, and expire November 9, 2014, if not exercised. Prior to June 14, 2012, the warrants contained anti-dilution price protection in the event the Company issued shares of common stock or securities exercisable for, or convertible into, common stock at a price per share less than the warrants’ exercise price. In accordance with these contractual anti-dilution price adjustment provisions, the warrants were re-priced as a result of a payment of a portion of the initial and deferred commitment fees related to the Company’s term loan with common stock on March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010.
Due to the anti-dilution price adjustment provisions established at the issuance date, the warrants were deemed to be a liability and were recorded at fair value at the date of issuance. The warrant liability was adjusted to fair value at the end of each reporting period through the statement of operations during the period the anti-dilution price adjustment provisions were in effect. On June 14, 2012, contractual provisions within the Company’s Exercisable and Contingent Warrant agreements were modified to eliminate the anti-dilution price adjustment provisions of the warrants and remove the cash settlement provisions in the event of a change of control. The amended warrants then qualified to be classified as equity. Accordingly, the Company revalued the warrants as of June 14, 2012, the date of contractual amendment. The change in fair value of the warrant liability compared to the fair value on December 31, 2011, $2.6 million, was recognized in income during 2012. The revalued warrant liability of $14.0 million was reclassified to additional-paid-in-capital on June 14, 2012. There were no longer fair value adjustments because the warrants continued to meet the criteria for equity classification.
The Company used the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of the warrant liability for each reporting period. On June 14, 2012, the date the warrants were amended, inputs into the fair value calculation included the actual remaining term of the warrants, a volatility rate of 58.1%, a risk-free rate of return of 0.36%, and an assumed dividend rate of zero.
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
On February 7, 2014, warrants were exercised to purchase 1,277,250 shares of the Company's common stock at $1.21 per share. The Company received cash proceeds of $1.5 million in connection with the warrants exercised. Following the exercise, the Company no longer hadhas any outstanding warrants fromwarrants.
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 14 — Stock Repurchase Program
In November 2012, the Company's Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $25 million of the Company's common stock. Repurchases may be made in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, the Company repurchased 180,190 shares of its saleoutstanding common stock on the open market at a cost of preferred stock and warrants in August 2009.$2.7 million, inclusive of transaction costs, or an average price of $14.71 per share.
As of March 31, 2015, the Company has $12.0 million remaining under its share repurchase program.
Note 1415 — Business Segment, Geographic and Major Customer Information
Segment Information
Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise for which separate financial information is available that is regularly evaluated by chief operating decision-makers in deciding how to allocate resources and assess performance. The operations of the Company are categorized into four reportable segments: Energy Chemistry Technologies (previously referred to as Energy Chemical Technologies), Consumer and Industrial Chemistry Technologies (previously referred to as Consumer and Industrial Chemical Technologies,Technologies), Drilling Technologies and Production Technologies.
Energy ChemicalChemistry Technologies designs, develops, manufactures, packages and markets specialty chemicalschemistries used in oil and natural gas well drilling, cementing, completion, stimulation and production. In addition, the Company's chemistries are used in specialized enhanced and improved oil recovery markets. Activities in this segment also include construction and management of automated material handling facilities and management of loading facilities and blending operations for oilfield services companies.
Consumer and Industrial ChemicalChemistry Technologies designs, develops and manufactures products that are sold to companies in the flavor and fragrance industries and the specialty chemical industry. These technologies are used by beverage and food companies, fragrance companies, and companies providing household and industrial cleaning products.
Drilling Technologies rents, sells, inspects, manufactures and markets down-holedownhole drilling equipment used in energy, mining, water well and industrial drilling activities.
| |
• | Production Technologies assembles and markets production-related equipment, including the PetrovalveTM product line of rod pump components, electric submersible pumps, gas separators, valves and services that support natural gas and oil production activities. |
The Company evaluates performance based upon a variety of criteria. The primary financial measure is segment operating income. Various functions, including certain sales and marketing activities and general and administrative activities, are provided centrally by the corporate office. Costs associated with corporate office functions, other corporate income and expense items, and income taxes, are not allocated to reportable segments.
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Summarized financial information of the reportable segments is as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As of and for the three months ended September 30, | Energy Chemical Technologies | | Consumer and Industrial Chemical Technologies | | Drilling Technologies | | Production Technologies | | Corporate and Other | | Total |
2014 | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net revenue from external customers | $ | 68,181 |
| | $ | 13,713 |
| | $ | 29,920 |
| | $ | 4,947 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 116,761 |
|
Gross margin | 28,424 |
| | 3,310 |
| | 11,928 |
| | 2,416 |
| | — |
| | 46,078 |
|
Income (loss) from operations | 19,903 |
| | 1,758 |
| | 5,557 |
| | 1,583 |
| | (7,954 | ) | | 20,847 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 1,103 |
| | 547 |
| | 2,433 |
| | 81 |
| | 298 |
| | 4,462 |
|
Total assets | 144,738 |
| | 89,574 |
| | 142,774 |
| | 18,252 |
| | 17,080 |
| | 412,418 |
|
Capital expenditures | 2,580 |
| | 7 |
| | 818 |
| | 141 |
| | 703 |
| | 4,249 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
2013 | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net revenue from external customers | $ | 51,670 |
| | $ | 15,292 |
| | $ | 27,569 |
| | $ | 3,857 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 98,388 |
|
Gross margin | 21,849 |
| | 3,588 |
| | 10,821 |
| | 1,244 |
| | — |
| | 37,502 |
|
Income (loss) from operations | 16,247 |
| | 2,301 |
| | 4,309 |
| | 769 |
| | (8,539 | ) | | 15,087 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 932 |
| | 382 |
| | 2,438 |
| | 60 |
| | 213 |
| | 4,025 |
|
Total assets | 121,876 |
| | 97,129 |
| | 136,832 |
| | 16,542 |
| | 8,600 |
| | 380,979 |
|
Capital expenditures | 161 |
| | 165 |
| | 1,596 |
| | 225 |
| | 328 |
| | 2,475 |
|
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
| | As of and for the nine months ended September 30, | Energy Chemical Technologies | | Consumer and Industrial Chemical Technologies | | Drilling Technologies | | Production Technologies | | Corporate and Other | | Total | |
As of and for the three months ended March 31, | | Energy Chemistry Technologies | | Consumer and Industrial Chemistry Technologies | | Drilling Technologies | | Production Technologies | | Corporate and Other | | Total |
2015 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net revenue from external customers | | $ | 46,643 |
| | $ | 13,463 |
| | $ | 18,694 |
| | $ | 3,573 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 82,373 |
|
Gross margin | | 16,100 |
| | 3,706 |
| | 5,991 |
| | 730 |
| | — |
| | 26,527 |
|
Income (loss) from operations | | 6,821 |
| | 2,381 |
| | (637 | ) | | (539 | ) | | (9,315 | ) | | (1,289 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization | | 1,204 |
| | 552 |
| | 2,319 |
| | 125 |
| | 370 |
| | 4,570 |
|
Total assets | | 152,423 |
| | 92,438 |
| | 141,229 |
| | 25,176 |
| | 3,741 |
| | 415,007 |
|
Capital expenditures | | 2,361 |
| | 22 |
| | 2,124 |
| | 638 |
| | 445 |
| | 5,590 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
2014 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net revenue from external customers | $ | 193,148 |
| | $ | 39,351 |
| | $ | 82,061 |
| | $ | 10,093 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 324,653 |
| $ | 62,377 |
| | $ | 13,030 |
| | $ | 24,901 |
| | $ | 2,267 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 102,575 |
|
Gross margin | 85,074 |
| | 10,237 |
| | 32,477 |
| | 4,280 |
| | — |
| | 132,068 |
| 29,220 |
| | 4,033 |
| | 9,788 |
| | 640 |
| | — |
| | 43,681 |
|
Income (loss) from operations | 60,690 |
| | 5,064 |
| | 13,073 |
| | 1,925 |
| | (23,432 | ) | | 57,320 |
| 21,623 |
| | 2,335 |
| | 3,317 |
| | (79 | ) | | (8,398 | ) | | 18,798 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 3,264 |
| | 1,529 |
| | 7,363 |
| | 244 |
| | 876 |
| | 13,276 |
| 1,067 |
| | 433 |
| | 2,437 |
| | 70 |
| | 212 |
| | 4,219 |
|
Total assets | 144,738 |
| | 89,574 |
| | 142,774 |
| | 18,252 |
| | 17,080 |
| | 412,418 |
| 137,638 |
| | 93,217 |
| | 136,141 |
| | 14,864 |
| | 8,656 |
| | 390,516 |
|
Capital expenditures | 5,383 |
| | 37 |
| | 6,139 |
| | 252 |
| | 1,683 |
| | 13,494 |
| 1,386 |
| | 14 |
| | 3,296 |
| | 61 |
| | 233 |
| | 4,990 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
2013 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net revenue from external customers | $ | 144,029 |
| | $ | 27,967 |
| | $ | 86,268 |
| | $ | 11,953 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 270,217 |
| |
Gross margin | 61,548 |
| | 7,281 |
| | 34,622 |
| | 4,275 |
| | — |
| | 107,726 |
| |
Income (loss) from operations | 45,300 |
| | 4,648 |
| | 15,510 |
| | 2,712 |
| | (27,004 | ) | | 41,166 |
| |
Depreciation and amortization | 2,201 |
| | 634 |
| | 7,215 |
| | 181 |
| | 717 |
| | 10,948 |
| |
Total assets | 121,876 |
| | 97,129 |
| | 136,832 |
| | 16,542 |
| | 8,600 |
| | 380,979 |
| |
Capital expenditures | 3,077 |
| | 165 |
| | 4,066 |
| | 1,669 |
| | 1,008 |
| | 9,985 |
| |
Geographic Information
Revenue by country is based on the location where services are provided and products are used. No individual country other than the United States (“U.S.”) accounted for more than 10% of revenue. Revenue by geographic location is as follows (in thousands): | | | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | | Three months ended March 31, |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
U.S. | $ | 92,643 |
| | $ | 84,640 |
| | $ | 271,663 |
| | $ | 234,151 |
| | $ | 64,195 |
| | $ | 87,331 |
|
Other countries | 24,118 |
| | 13,748 |
| | 52,990 |
| | 36,066 |
| | 18,178 |
| | 15,244 |
|
Total | $ | 116,761 |
| | $ | 98,388 |
| | $ | 324,653 |
| | $ | 270,217 |
| | $ | 82,373 |
| | $ | 102,575 |
|
Long-lived assets held in countries other than the U.S. are not considered material to the consolidated financial statements.
Major Customers
One customer accounted for 12.7% and 15.5%Revenue from major customers, as a percentage of consolidated revenue, is as follows:
|
| | | | | | |
| | Three months ended March 31, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 |
Customer A | | 12.0 | % | | * |
|
Customer B | | 10.3 | % | | 15.4 | % |
* This customer did not account for more than 10% of revenue during the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and 17.0% and 16.6% of consolidated revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. period.
Over 93% of the revenue from this customerthese customers was for sales in the Energy ChemicalChemistry Technologies segment.
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1516 — Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
The Company is subject to routine litigation and other claims that arise in the normal course of business. Management is not aware of any pending or threatened lawsuits or proceedings that are expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
Representation AgreementsEPA Environmental Proceeding
In February 2011,On January 9, 2015, FC Pro, LLC (“FC Pro”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into two separate representation agreements with Basin Supply Corporationreceived a letter and proposed consent agreement and final order from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“Basin Supply”EPA”), a multinational, energy industry-focused supply chain management company, to market certain concerning alleged violations of the Company’sfederal hazardous waste regulations at FC Pro’s specialty chemicalschemical blending facility in Waller, Texas. Specifically, EPA alleged that FC Pro failed to comply with certain notification, operating, and down-hole drilling productsreporting requirements applicable to generators or large quantity generators of hazardous waste. FC Pro has resolved the alleged violations pursuant to a consent agreement and services within various international markets, includingfinal order under which it did not admit or deny the Middle East, Africa, Latin Americaallegations and agreed to pay an administrative penalty of $410,868, obtain an EPA identification number, and develop certain specified operating procedures. The consent agreement and final order has been signed by EPA and will become final upon being ratified by the former Soviet Union. Both agreements are effective through December 31, 2015. Under each agreement, Basin Supply is eligibleregional judicial officer. Since this enforcement case was initiated, FC Pro has made changes to receive warrants to purchase Flotek common stock (at an exercise price of 125%its operating practices at its Waller facility that it believes has resulted in it no longer generating hazardous waste at that facility.
The amount of the price of Flotek's common stock oncivil penalty has been recorded as selling, general and administrative expense during the grant date) upon exceeding contractually defined annual base and “stretch” sales targets. The number of warrants that could be issued under the terms of each of the agreements is 100,000 during 2014.three months ended March 31, 2015.
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Concentrations and Credit Risk
The majority of the Company’s revenue is derived from the oil and gas industry. Customers include major oilfield services companies, major integrated oil and natural gas companies, independent oil and natural gas companies, pressure pumping service companies and state-owned national oil companies. This concentration of customers in one industry increases credit and business risks.
The Company is subject to significant concentrations of credit risk within trade accounts receivable as the Company does not generally require collateral as support for trade receivables. In addition, the majority of the Company’s cash is maintained at onea major financial institution and balances often exceed insurable amounts.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Quarterly Report”), and in particular, Part I, Item 2 - “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions, 15 U.S.C. § 78u-5, of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Reform Act”). Forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but instead represent the Company’s current assumptions and beliefs regarding future events, many of which, by their nature, are inherently uncertain and outside the Company’s control. Such statements include estimates, projections, and statements related to Flotek Industries, Inc.’s (“Flotek” or the “Company”) business plan, objectives, expected operating results and assumptions upon which those statements are based. The forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report are based on information available as of the date of this Quarterly Report.
The forward-looking statements relate to future industry trends and economic conditions, forecast performance or results of current and future initiatives and the outcome of contingencies and other uncertainties that may have a significant impact on the Company’s business, future operating results and liquidity. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by words including, but not limited to, “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “continue,” “intend,” “expect,” “plan,” “forecast,” “project” and similar expressions, or future-tense or conditional constructions such as “will,” “may,���” “should,” “could,“could” and “would,” etc.or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology. The Company cautions that these statements are merely predictions, and are not to be considered guarantees of future performance. Forward-looking statements are based upon current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties that can cause actual results to differ materially from those projected, anticipated or implied.
A detailed discussion of potential risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from forward-looking statements is included in Part I, Item 1A - “Risk Factors” of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20132014, (the “Annual Report”) and periodically in subsequent reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The Company has no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information or future events, except as required by law.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto, as well as the Annual Report. Phrases such as “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” refer to Flotek Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
Executive Summary
Flotek is a global, diversified, technology-driven company that develops and supplies oilfield products, services and equipment to the oil, gas and mining industries, and high value compounds to companies that make cleaning products, cosmetics, food and beverages, and other products that are sold in the consumer and industrial markets.
The Company’s oilfield businesses include specialty chemicalschemistries and logistics, down-holedownhole drilling tools and production-related tools. Flotek’s technologies enable customers to drill wells more efficiently, increase well production and decrease well operating costs. The Company also provides automated bulk material handling, loading facilities and blending capabilities. The Company sources citrus oil domestically and internationally and is one of the largest processors of citrus oil in the world. Products produced from processed citrus oil include (1) high value compounds used as additives by companies in the flavors and fragrances markets and (2) environmentally friendly chemicalschemistries for use in numerous industries around the world, specifically the oil and gas (“O&G”) industry.
Flotek operates in over 20 domestic and international markets, including the Gulf Coast, Southwest, West Coast, Rocky Mountains, Northeastern and Mid-Continental regions of the United States (the “U.S.”), Canada, Mexico, Central America, South America, Europe, Africa, Middle East, Australia and Asia-Pacific. Customers include major integrated O&G companies, oilfield services companies, independent O&G companies, pressure-pumping service companies, national and state-owned oil companies, and international supply chain management companies. The Company's Consumer and Industrial Chemical Technologies (“CICT”) segmentCompany also serves customers who purchase non-energy-related citrus oil and related products, including household and commercial cleaning product companies, fragrance and cosmetic companies, and food manufacturing companies.
The operations of the Company are categorized into four reportable segments: Energy Chemical Technologies, Consumer and Industrial Chemical Technologies, Drilling Technologies and ProductionChemistry Technologies (previously referred to as Artificial LiftEnergy Chemical Technologies)., Consumer and Industrial Chemistry Technologies (previously referred to as Consumer and Industrial Chemical Technologies), Drilling Technologies and Production Technologies.
Energy ChemicalChemistry Technologies designs, develops, manufactures, packages and markets specialty chemicalschemistries used in O&G well drilling, cementing, completion, stimulation and production. In addition, the Company's chemistries are used in specialized enhanced and improved oil recovery markets ("EOR" or "IOR"). Activities in this segment also include construction and management of automated material handling facilities and management of loading facilities and blending operations for oilfield services companies.
Consumer and Industrial ChemicalChemistry Technologies designs, develops and manufactures products that are sold to companies in the flavor and fragrance industries and the specialty chemicalchemistry industry. These technologies are used by beverage and food companies, fragrance companies, and companies providing household and industrial cleaning products.
Drilling Technologies rents, sells, inspects, manufactures and markets down-holedownhole drilling equipment used in energy, mining, water well and industrial drilling activities.
Production Technologies assembles and markets production-related equipment, including the Petrovalve product line of rod pump components, electric submersible pumps, gas separators, valves and services that support natural gas and oil production activities.
| |
• | Production Technologies assembles and markets production-related equipment, including the PetrovalveTM product line of rod pump components, electric submersible pumps, gas separators, valves and services that support natural gas and oil production activities. |
Market Conditions
The Company’s success is sensitive to a number of factors, which include, but are not limited to, drilling activity, customer demand for its advanced technology products, market prices for raw materials and governmental actions.
Drilling activity levels are influenced by a number of factors, including the number of rigs in operation, the geographical areas of rig activity, and drill rig efficiency (rig days required per well). Additional factors that influence the level of drilling activity include:
Historical, current, and anticipated future O&G prices,
Federal, State and local governmental actions that may encourage or discourage drilling activity,
Customers’ strategies relative to capital funds allocations,
Weather conditions, and
Technological changes to drilling methods and economics.
Historical North American drilling activity is reflected in “TABLE A” on the following page.
Customers’ demand for advanced technology products and services provided by the Company are dependent on their recognition of the value of:
Chemistries that improve the economics of their O&G operations,
Drilling products that improve drilling operations and efficiencies, and
Chemistries that are economically viable, socially responsible and ecologically sound.sound, and
Production technologies that improve production and production efficiencies in maturing wells.
Market prices for citrus oils can be influenced by:
Historical, current, and anticipated future production levels of the global citrus (primarily orange) crop,
Weather related risks, and
Health and condition of citrus trees (e.g., disease and pests)., and
International competition and pricing pressures resulting from natural and artificial pricing influences.
Governmental actions may restrict the future use of hazardous chemicals, including but not limited to, the following industrial applications:
O&G drilling and completion operations,
O&G production operations, and
Non-O&G industrial solvents.
| | TABLE A | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | | Three months ended March 31, |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | % Change |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | % Change | | 2015 | | 2014 | | % Change |
North American Average Active Drilling Rigs | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. | 1,903 |
| | 1,770 |
| | 7.5 | % | | 1,845 |
| | 1,763 |
| | 4.7 | % | | 1,403 |
| | 1,779 |
| | (21.1 | )% |
Canada | 386 |
| | 350 |
| | 10.3 | % | | 370 |
| | 349 |
| | 6.0 | % | | 313 |
| | 525 |
| | (40.4 | )% |
Total Average North American Drilling Rigs | 2,289 |
| | 2,120 |
| | 8.0 | % | | 2,215 |
| | 2,112 |
| | 4.9 | % | | 1,716 |
| | 2,304 |
| | (25.5 | )% |
U.S. Average Active Drilling Rigs by Type | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Vertical | 372 |
| | 436 |
| | (14.7 | )% | | 385 |
| | 443 |
| | (13.1 | )% | | 217 |
| | 387 |
| | (43.9 | )% |
Horizontal | 1,314 |
| | 1,073 |
| | 22.5 | % | | 1,246 |
| | 1,096 |
| | 13.7 | % | | 1,055 |
| | 1,182 |
| | (10.7 | )% |
Directional | 217 |
| | 261 |
| | (16.9 | )% | | 214 |
| | 224 |
| | (4.5 | )% | | 131 |
| | 210 |
| | (37.6 | )% |
Total Average U.S. Drilling Rigs by Type | 1,903 |
| | 1,770 |
| | 7.5 | % | | 1,845 |
| | 1,763 |
| | 4.7 | % | | 1,403 |
| | 1,779 |
| | (21.1 | )% |
Oil vs. Natural Gas Average North American Drilling Rigs | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Oil | 1,797 |
| | 1,609 |
| | 11.7 | % | | 1,731 |
| | 1,610 |
| | 7.5 | % | | 1,257 |
| | 1,766 |
| | (28.8 | )% |
Natural Gas | 492 |
| | 511 |
| | (3.7 | )% | | 484 |
| | 502 |
| | (3.6 | )% | | 459 |
| | 538 |
| | (14.7 | )% |
Total North America | 2,289 |
| | 2,120 |
| | 8.0 | % | | 2,215 |
| | 2,112 |
| | 4.9 | % | | 1,716 |
| | 2,304 |
| | (25.5 | )% |
U.S. Average Wells Drilled per Quarter per Rig | 5.19 |
| | 5.31 |
| | (2.3 | )% | | 5.22 |
| | 5.20 |
| | 0.4 | % | |
Source: Rig and well counts arecount is per Baker Hughes, Inc. (www.bakerhughes.com). Rig counts are the averages of the weekly rig count activity. Average wells drilled per quarter per
As crude oil prices peaked at approximately $106/barrel in June 2014 and began the descent to the current levels hovering around $50/barrel, total US rig iscount decreased from 1,929 rigs on November 21, 2014, to 1,048 rigs as of March 27, 2015, representing a 45.6% drop. Additionally, as the numbertotal US rig count dropped, the horizontal rig count declined 40.8%, the directional rig count decreased by 55.1%, and the vertical rig count fell by 59.1%. Horizontal rigs now represent 77.5% of wells drilledthe total working US rig count, versus 71.1% at the peak US drilling activity level in November 2014.
The Canadian rig count has had a similar response. Canadian rigs failed to reach the reporting period divided by600 - 700 rig range normally achieved from mid-January through early March before the average weeklyspring thaw resulted in significantly reduced drilling activity. The Canadian rig count. Current quarter well count data from Baker Hughes, Inc. is preliminarypeaked on January 16, 2015, at 440 rigs and is subjecthas fallen continuously through March 27, 2015, to revision.120 rigs.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015, the total North American active drilling rig count saw an increasedecreased 25.5% when compared to the comparable periodssame period of 2013, primarily in oil drilling rigs. Average2014. The average North American oil drilling rig activity increasedcount decreased by 11.7% and 7.5%28.8% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively,March 31, 2015, when compared to the same periodsperiod of 2013.2014. The average North American natural gas drilling rig count decreased by 3.7% and 3.6%14.7% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively,March 31, 2015, compared to the same periodsperiod of 2013.2014.
Overall U.S. rig activity increased 7.5% and 4.7% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 compared to the same periods in 2013, and the number of wells drilled per rig per quarter held relatively constant for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 at 5.22 compared to 5.20 for the same period in 2013. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, U.S. drilling rigs by type continued to show a shift toward horizontal wells and away from vertical and directional wells.
Company Outlook
Future economic conditions are expected to remain consistent with recent market conditions. Increases in drilling rig operating efficiencies noted above are resulting in pricing pressure on rig-based operations. To some extent, those pressures impact drilling suppliers such as Flotek, especially in our Drilling Technologies segment. Our tools are being leased for a smaller amount of time per well drilled, which is partially offset by the expansionBeginning in the numbersecond half of wells being drilled per2014 and continuing through the first quarter per rig.
The Company is expanding its Energy Chemical Technologies and Drilling Technologies businesses by expanding its production capacity, developing innovative new products and pursuing and developing new market opportunities. The Company continues to repositionof 2015, the Production Technologies segment to focus on niche technologies in theprice of crude oil and natural gas markets.declined dramatically. As a result, most North American exploration and production companies - many of this repositioning,which are Flotek clients - are significantly reducing their exploration and drilling activity in 2015. The reduction in activity creates a more challenging environment in which to market the Company's broad range of energy technologies, from chemistry to drilling and production technologies. Although the Company expects demand for its oil and gas related products and services in North America to be impacted by these industry conditions, the Company plans to increase capital allocatedcontinue aggressive marketing of its oil and gas based products and services including its Complex nano-Fluid® chemistries, Teledrift® product line, recently introduced Stemulator® product line and the growing line of production technologies. While international markets may react differently than North American markets to this segment.the decline in crude prices, the Company expects similar market challenges around the globe. However, the Company believes there will continue to be new market opportunities available in the current price environment.
In response to the current market environment, the Company has been proactive in reducing costs to reflect current market conditions while, at the same time, remaining focused on preserving appropriate functions and capacity, which allows the Company to be opportunistic when market conditions improve. Cost reductions to date include the consolidation of certain operating bases, reducing lease and personnel expense; other headcount reductions and hiring restrictions that have not impacted customer service or production output; vendor price reductions that have partially mitigated gross margin erosion; and other cost controls that have reduced overall operating costs of our business. Capital spending has largely been limited to completion of existing projects with a focus on revenue-generating expenditures. The Company regularly evaluates its cost structure based on market conditions with a focus on continuous efficiency improvements.
Capital expenditures, exclusive of acquisitions, totaled $13.5$5.6 million and $10.0$5.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The Company continues to pursue selected strategic acquisitions and relationships, both domestically and internationally, when opportunities arise.
In November 2013, the Company signed a shareholder agreement with Tasneea Oil and Gas Technologies, LLC (“Tasneea”) an Omani Limited Liability Company, to form Omani based Flotek Gulf, LLC (“Flotek Gulf”) and Flotek Gulf Research, LLC (“Flotek Gulf Research”). During the three months ended September 30,March 31, 2015 and 2014, Flotek and Tasneea transferred initial capital into Flotek Gulf and Flotek Gulf Research. Flotek Gulf and Flotek Gulf Research will develop and market specialty chemistriesrespectively. Of the $5.6 million spent to date in 2015, 89% has been for the oil and gas industry throughout the Middle East and North Africa. In the coming year, Flotek Gulfcompletion of projects started in 2014. The Company expects capital spending to construct a manufacturing facility designed to produce Flotek's patented and proprietary productsbe approximately $21 million in 2015, inclusive of approximately $8 million for distribution throughout the region.
Effective January 1, 2014, the Company acquired Eclipse IOR Services, LLC (“EOGA”), a leading enhanced oil recovery (EOR) design and injection firm. EOGA’s expertise in enhanced oil recovery processes and the use of polymers to improve the performance of EOR projects has been combined withmajor facilities, including the Company’s existing EOR productspreviously announced Global Research & Innovation Headquarters in Houston. The Company believes construction of this facility should generate substantial value in 2016 and services.beyond. The combined productCompany will remain nimble in its core capital expenditure plans, adjusting as market conditions warrant.
The Company’s planned Global Research & Innovation Headquarters in Houston will allow for the development of new energy chemistries as well as expand collaboration between clients, leaders from academia and service offerings are well positionedCompany scientists. The Company believes these collaborative opportunities will become an important and distinguishing capability within the industry. The Company also plans to servecontinue to expand the growing market for EOR productscapabilities and services.
On April 1, 2014, the Company acquired 100%use of the membership interests in SiteLark, LLC (“SiteLark”) for $0.4 million and 5,327 shares of the Company's common stock. SiteLark provides reservoir engineering and modeling services for a variety of hydrocarbon applications. Its services include proprietary software which assists engineers with reservoir simulation, reservoir engineering and waterflood optimization.
In May 2014, the Company launched its patent pending FracMax™FracMaxTM software technology. which should continue to enhance the Company’s sales and marketing efforts by validating the production and economic benefits of the Company’s core Complex nano-Fluid® chemistries.
The FracMax™ applicationanalytical platform is an innovative software technology that allows the Company to quantitatively demonstrate the benefits associated with the use of the Company’s patented and proprietary Complex nano-Fluid®nano-Fluid® chemistries. The FracMax™ application has been integrated into the Company’s sales and marketing process leading to new sales opportunities. In October 2014, the Company announced the formation of FracMax Analytics, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary that will use the FracMax™ softwareanalytical platform to provide customized data analysis to oil and gas operators, investors and other companies.
The Company believes governmental reactioncontinues to constituents’ environmental concerns regardingpursue selected strategic relationships, both domestically and internationally, to expand its business:
In March 2015, the Company entered into agreements with Solazyme, Inc (“Solazyme”) to globally commercialize Flocapso™, an innovative, advanced drilling fluid additive that combines Flotek’s patented Complex nano-Fluid® chemistries with Solazyme’s proprietary EncapsoTM technology. FlocapsoTM will allow the use of water-based fluids in wells that previously required more expensive and invasive oil-based products, providing an environmentally superior, more efficient solution to drilling challenges. In addition, Flotek will market Solazyme’s Encapso™ lubricant - the first commercially available, biodegradable encapsulated lubricant for drilling fluids - in certain Middle Eastern markets.
In January 2015, the Company acquired 100% of the assets from International Artificial Lift, LLC (“IAL”), a development-stage company that specializes in the design, manufacturing and service of next-generation hydraulic fracturing processpumping units that serve to increase and maximize production for oil and natural gas wells.
In April 2014, the Company acquired 100% of the membership interests in SiteLark, LLC (“SiteLark”). SiteLark provides reservoir engineering and modeling services for a variety of hydrocarbon applications. Its service assists engineers with reservoir simulation, reservoir engineering and waterflood optimization.
In January 2014, the Company acquired Eclipse IOR Services, LLC (“EOGA”), a leading enhanced oil recovery design and injection firm. EOGA’s expertise in enhanced oil recovery processes and the use of hazardous chemicals in O&G operations could workpolymers to its advantage. These environmental concerns favorimprove the Company's chemistries as economical replacements for more hazardous chemicals currently in use in many drillingperformance of EOR projects have been combined with the Company’s previously existing EOR products and producing operations. Several states and countries have grass-roots, citizen movements that are aimed specifically at “greening” the hydraulic fracturing process, and management believes it is likely these environmental concerns/reactions will broaden to other states in the quarters to come.
services.
The outlook for the Company’s consumer and industrial chemistries will be driven by availability and demand for citrus oils and other bio-based raw materials. Current inventory and crop expectations for 2014 and into 2015 are sufficient to meet the Company’s needs to supply its flavor and fragrance business as well as the industrial markets. However, market price volatility will likelymay result in revenue and margin fluctuations from quarter to quarter.
The Company works to maintain a portfolio of products which are adaptable to meet our customers’ demands for customized products for the various drilling and producing environments in which they operate. The Company's commitment to research and innovation permits the Company to remain responsive to increased demand and continued growth. The Company remains committed to continued development of its product technologies to better serve its customers' needs. The Company believes that it is well-positioned to respond to increased demand for the Company's suite of hydrocarbon stimulation and completion products, particularly the Company's patented Complex nano-Fluid™ chemistries. In addition, the Company anticipates continued strong demand for its Teledrift® Pro-series tool product lines and its recently introduced Stemulator® tool.quarter-to-quarter.
Changes to geopolitical, global geo-politicaleconomic and economic eventsindustry trends could have an impact, either positive or negative, on the Company’s business. In the event of significant adverse changes to the demand for O&Goil and gas production and/or the market price for oil and gas, the market conditions affecting the Company could change quicklyrapidly and materially. Should such adverse changes to market conditions occur, management believes the Company has adequate liquidity to withstand the impact of such changes.changes while continuing to make strategic capital investments and acquisitions if and when opportunities arise. In addition, management believes the Company is well-positioned to take advantage of significant increases in demand for its products should market conditions improve dramatically in the near term.
The Company expects that competition for contracts and margins will remain intense in the future but believes that product innovation, service improvements and quantitative data from its FracMax™ technologyanalytical platform will enable the Company to realize relative market share gains during the remainder of 20142015 and into 2015.2016.
Consolidated Results of Operations (in thousands):
| | | | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | Three months ended March 31, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2013 | 2015 | | 2014 |
Revenue | | $ | 116,761 |
| | $ | 98,388 |
| | $ | 324,653 |
| | $ | 270,217 |
| $ | 82,373 |
| | $ | 102,575 |
|
Cost of revenue | | 70,683 |
| | 60,886 |
| | 192,585 |
| | 162,491 |
| 55,846 |
| | 58,894 |
|
Gross margin | | 46,078 |
| | 37,502 |
| | 132,068 |
| | 107,726 |
| 26,527 |
| | 43,681 |
|
Gross margin % | | 39.5 | % | | 38.1 | % | | 40.7 | % | | 39.9 | % | 32.2 | % | | 42.6 | % |
Selling, general and administrative costs | | 21,499 |
| | 19,542 |
| | 63,924 |
| | 58,640 |
| 23,888 |
| | 21,572 |
|
Selling, general and administrative costs % | | 18.4 | % | | 19.9 | % | | 19.7 | % | | 21.7 | % | 29.0 | % | | 21.0 | % |
Depreciation and amortization | | 2,439 |
| | 2,038 |
| | 7,225 |
| | 5,231 |
| 2,676 |
| | 2,285 |
|
Research and development | | 1,293 |
| | 835 |
| | 3,599 |
| | 2,689 |
| |
Income from operations | | 20,847 |
| | 15,087 |
| | 57,320 |
| | 41,166 |
| |
Income from operations % | | 17.9 | % | | 15.3 | % | | 17.7 | % | | 15.2 | % | |
Research and innovation costs | | 1,252 |
| | 1,026 |
|
Income (loss) from operations | | (1,289 | ) | | 18,798 |
|
Income (loss) from operations % | | (1.6 | )% | | 18.3 | % |
Interest and other expense, net | | (511 | ) | | (471 | ) | | (1,565 | ) | | (1,378 | ) | (632 | ) | | (400 | ) |
Income before income taxes | | 20,336 |
| | 14,616 |
| | 55,755 |
| | 39,788 |
| |
Income tax expense | | (6,064 | ) | | (5,648 | ) | | (18,425 | ) | | (14,615 | ) | |
Net income | | $ | 14,272 |
| | $ | 8,968 |
| | $ | 37,330 |
| | $ | 25,173 |
| |
Net income % | | 12.2 | % | | 9.1 | % | | 11.5 | % | | 9.3 | % | |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | (1,921 | ) | | 18,398 |
|
Income tax benefit (expense) | | 406 |
| | (6,380 | ) |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (1,515 | ) | | $ | 12,018 |
|
Net income (loss) % | | (1.8 | )% | | 11.7 | % |
Consolidated Results of Operations: Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014March 31, 2015, Compared to the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013March 31, 2014
Consolidated revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 increased $18.4March 31, 2015, decreased $20.2 million, or 18.7%19.7%, and $54.4 million, or 20.1%, respectively, relative to the comparable periodsperiod of 2013.2014. The increasedecrease in revenue forwas driven by the three months ended September 30, 2014 compared todecline in drilling activity as indicated by the same period of 2013 was primarily due to increased sales of stimulation chemical additives25.5% decline in ourNorth American rig count which affected the Energy Chemical Technologies segment, increased actuated tool and Teledrift® tool rentals in our Drilling Technologies segment, and increased international valve and valve equipment sales in our Production Technologies segment. The increase in revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 compared to the same period of 2013 was primarily due to increased sales of stimulation chemical additives in our Energy Chemical Technologies segment, the acquisition of Florida Chemical in the second quarter of 2013, and incremental revenue from the 2014 acquisitions of EOGA and SiteLark. These increases were partially offset by revenue declines in the DrillingChemistry Technologies and ProductionDrilling Technologies segments.
Consolidated gross margin for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 increased $8.6March 31, 2015, decreased $17.2 million, or 22.9%39.3%, and $24.3 million, or 22.6%, respectively, relative to the comparable periodsperiod of 2013. The increase in gross margin was primarily due to the increase in revenue.2014. Gross margin as a percentage of revenue increaseddecreased to 39.5%32.2% for the three months ended September 30, 2014March 31, 2015, from 38.1%42.6% in the same period of 2013,2014, primarily due to increased international sales in our Production Technologies segment. Gross margin as a percentage of revenue increased to 40.7%new incentive pricing structures for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 from 39.9% in the same period of 2013, primarily attributable to supply chain benefits from the Florida Chemical acquisition, partially offset by the change in portfoliostrategic relationships, product mix resulting from the inclusion of Florida Chemical in the consolidated results for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.and price concessions.
Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses are not directly attributable to products sold or services provided. SG&A costs as a percentage of revenue declined from 19.9% to 18.4%expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and from 21.7% to 19.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 as comparedMarch 31, 2015, increased $2.3 million, or 10.7%, relative to the same periods of 2013, as revenues grew faster than SG&A costs. SG&A costs increased $2.0 million, or 10.0%, for the three months ended September 30, 2014 as compared to the samecomparable period of 2013,2014. The increase was primarily due to costs for additional headcounthigher stock compensation expense, increased head count in the Energy Chemistry sales and R&I staff during 2014, and a civil penalty related to supportan environmental matter assessed in 2015, partially offset by cost reduction actions taken throughout the Company's growth and costs attributable toorganization during the companies we acquired.first quarter of 2015. The company regularly evaluates its SG&A costs increased $5.3 million, or 9.0%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to the same period of 2013 primarily due to SG&A costs for the acquired companies discussed above.cost structure as market conditions warrant.
Depreciation and amortization expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014March 31, 2015, increased by $0.4 million, or 19.7%17.1%, and $2.0 million, or 38.1%, respectively, relative to the comparable periods of 2013.2014. The increase for the nine months
ended September 30, 2014 was primarily attributable to the depreciation and amortization of assets recognized as part ofimprovements to facilities and equipment that were added during the acquisition of Florida Chemical in the second quarter of 2013 and the acquisition of EOGA in the first quarterlater portion of 2014.
Research and Development ("Innovation (“R&D"&I”) expense increased $0.5$0.2 million, or 54.9%, and $0.9 million, or 33.8%22.0%, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively,March 31, 2015, as compared to the same periodsperiod in 2013.2014. The increase in R&D&I is primarily attributable to new product development and Flotek'sFlotek’s commitment to remaining responsive to customer needs, increased demand and continued growth of our existing product lines.
Interest and other expense remained relatively flatincreased $0.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 asMarch 31, 2015, compared to the same periodsperiod of 2013.2014.
The Company recorded income tax provisionsbenefit of $6.1 million and $18.4$0.4 million, yielding an effective tax ratesrate of 29.8% and 33.0%21.1% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively,March 31, 2015, compared to the income tax provisionsprovision of $5.6 million and $14.6$6.4 million reflecting an effective tax ratesrate of 38.6% and 36.7%34.7% for the comparable periodsperiod in 2013.2014. The reduction in the effective tax rate is primarily attributable to the mix of pre-tax profit and loss between domestic and international taxing jurisdictions.
Results by Segment
| | Energy Chemical Technologies (dollars in thousands) | | | | | | | | | |
Energy Chemistry Technologies (previously referred to as Energy Chemical Technologies) (dollars in thousands) | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | | Three months ended March 31, | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2015 | | 2014 | |
Revenue | | $ | 68,181 |
| | $ | 51,670 |
| | $ | 193,148 |
| | $ | 144,029 |
| | $ | 46,643 |
| | $ | 62,377 |
| |
Gross margin | | 28,424 |
| | 21,849 |
| | 85,074 |
| | 61,548 |
| | 16,100 |
| | 29,220 |
| |
Gross margin % | | 41.7 | % | | 42.3 | % | | 44.0 | % | | 42.7 | % | | 34.5 | % | | 46.8 | % | |
Income from operations | | 19,903 |
| | 16,247 |
| | 60,690 |
| | 45,300 |
| | 6,821 |
| | 21,623 |
| |
Income from operations % | | 29.2 | % | | 31.4 | % | | 31.4 | % | | 31.5 | % | | 14.6 | % | | 34.7 | % | |
Energy ChemicalChemistry Technologies Results of Operations: Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014March 31, 2015, Compared to the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013March 31, 2014
Energy ChemicalChemistry Technologies revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2014March 31, 2015 increased $16.5, decreased $15.7 million, or 32.0%25.2%, relative to the comparable period of 2013. Excluding2014. This reduction in revenue virtually mirrored the incremental revenue impactdecrease in the North American active drilling rig count of 25.5% over the comparable periods. While eroding market conditions are the primary driver of the EOGArevenue decrease, Flotek has aggressively pursued strategic relationships with existing customers and SiteLark acquisitionshas continued to promote the benefits of $1.5 million, revenue increased $15.0CnF® in completions and restimulation efforts by leveraging the quantitative evidence validated through the FracMax™ analytical platform. These strategic sales and marketing efforts are ensuring that Flotek remains a leader in the energy chemistry industry and is poised to take advantage of any market recovery.
Energy Chemistry Technologies gross margin decreased $13.1 million, or 29.1%44.9%, for the three months ended September 30, 2014March 31, 2015 compared to the same period of 2013. Increased sales of stimulation chemical additives accounted for the majority of the revenue increase. Revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 increased $49.1 million, or 34.1%, relative to the comparable period of 2013. Excluding the incremental revenue impact of the Florida Chemical, EOGA and SiteLark acquisitions of $9.4 million, revenue increased $39.7 million, or 28.6%, compared to the same period of 2013, primarily due to the increased sales of stimulation chemical additives mentioned above.
Energy Chemical Technologies gross margin increased $6.6 million, or 30.1%, and $23.5 million, or 38.2%, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2013 primarily due to the increase in product sales revenue.2014. Gross margin as a percentage of revenue decreased to 41.7%34.5% for the three months ended September 30, 2014March 31, 2015, from 42.3%46.8% in the same period of 2013,2014, primarily due to a new incentive pricing structure, increased logistics costsstructures associated with new strategic relationships and inventory adjustments during 2014, partially offset by improved margins for xylene replacement products, expanded markets for CnF® and productivity improvements in the manufacturing process. Gross margin as a percentage of revenue increased to 44.0% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 from 42.7% in the same period of 2013, primarily due to the supply chain benefits of the Florida Chemical acquisition.product mix.
Income from operations for the Energy ChemicalChemistry Technologies segment increased $3.7decreased $14.8 million, or 22.5%68.5%, for the three months ended September 30, 2014March 31, 2015, and increased $15.4 million, or 34.0%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 relative to the comparable periods of 2013.2014. The increasedecrease in income from operations for both periods is primarily attributable to an increasethe decrease in gross margin, partially offset by increased headcount travel and associated costs related toduring 2014 in the sales organization, in pursuit of growth opportunities.opportunities, and in R&I, related to new product development and increased demand for existing product support, and a civil penalty related to an environmental matter. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, the Energy Chemistry Technologies segment implemented cost control measures including a 10% decrease in compensation and benefits associated with headcount reductions to more closely align the segment staffing with current market conditions.
| | Consumer and Industrial Chemical Technologies (dollars in thousands) | | | | | | | | | |
Consumer and Industrial Chemistry Technologies (previously referred to as Consumer and Industrial Chemical Technologies) (dollars in thousands) | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | | Three months ended March 31, | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2015 | | 2014 | |
Revenue | | $ | 13,713 |
| | $ | 15,292 |
| | $ | 39,351 |
| | $ | 27,967 |
| | $ | 13,463 |
| | $ | 13,030 |
| |
Gross margin | | 3,310 |
| | 3,588 |
| | 10,237 |
| | 7,281 |
| | 3,706 |
| | 4,033 |
| |
Gross margin % | | 24.1 | % | | 23.5 | % | | 26.0 | % | | 26.0 | % | | 27.5 | % | | 31.0 | % | |
Income from operations | | 1,758 |
| | 2,301 |
| | 5,064 |
| | 4,648 |
| | 2,381 |
| | 2,335 |
| |
Income from operations % | | 12.8 | % | | 15.0 | % | | 12.9 | % | | 16.6 | % | | 17.7 | % | | 17.9 | % | |
CICTConsumer and Industrial Chemistry Technologies (CICT) Results of Operations: Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014March 31, 2015, Compared to the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013March 31, 2014
CICT revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2014March 31, 2015 decreased $1.6, increased $0.4 million, or 10.3%3.3%, compared to the same period in 2013,2014, primarily due to decreasedincreased terpene salesprices between the two periods. Revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 increased $11.4 million, or 40.7%, from the comparable period of 2013, as the segment was created in the second quarter of 2013 upon the acquisition of Florida Chemical.
CICT gross margin for the three months ended September 30, 2014March 31, 2015, decreased $0.3 million, or 7.7%8.1%, from the comparable period of 2013,2014, primarily due to the lowerhigher terpene sales mentioned above. Gross margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2014costs partially offset by increased $3.0 million, or 40.6%, from the comparable period of 2013, primarily due to the segment being created in the second quarter of 2013 upon the acquisition of Florida Chemical.prices. Gross margin as a percentage of revenue increaseddecreased to 24.1%27.5% for the three months ended September 30, 2014March 31, 2015, from 23.5%31.0% in the same period of 2013,2014, primarily due to increased sales of higher margin flavor and fragrance products. Gross margin as a percentage of revenue remained flat at 26.0% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013.terpene costs.
Income from operations for the CICT segment decreased $0.5 million, or 23.6%,remained relatively flat for the three months ended September 30, 2014March 31, 2015 compared to the same period of 2013, primarily due to2014, as reductions in compensation and benefits associated with headcount reductions offset the revenue and gross margin factors described above. Income from operations increased $0.4 million, or 9.0%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 compared to the same period of 2013, primarily due to the increased revenue between the two periods.
| | Drilling Technologies (dollars in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | | Three months ended March 31, | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2015 | | 2014 | |
Revenue | | $ | 29,920 |
| | $ | 27,569 |
| | $ | 82,061 |
| | $ | 86,268 |
| | $ | 18,694 |
| | $ | 24,901 |
| |
Gross margin | | 11,928 |
| | 10,821 |
| | 32,477 |
| | 34,622 |
| | 5,991 |
| | 9,788 |
| |
Gross margin % | | 39.9 | % | | 39.3 | % | | 39.6 | % | | 40.1 | % | | 32.0 | % | | 39.3 | % | |
Income from operations | | 5,557 |
| | 4,309 |
| | 13,073 |
| | 15,510 |
| |
Income from operations % | | 18.6 | % | | 15.6 | % | | 15.9 | % | | 18.0 | % | |
Income (loss) from operations | | | (637 | ) | | 3,317 |
| |
Income (loss) from operations % | | | (3.4 | )% | | 13.3 | % | |
Drilling Technologies Results of Operations: Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014March 31, 2015, Compared to the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013March 31, 2014
Drilling Technologies revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2014 increased $2.4March 31, 2015, decreased $6.2 million, or 8.5%24.9%, relative to the same period in 2013, primarily due to an increase in actuated tool rentals, Teledrift® tool rentals, and increases in float equipment product sales. Revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, decreased $4.2 million, or 4.9%, relative to the same period in 2013, primarily due to a decrease in Teledrift® domestic rental revenue, decreased international drill pipe sales,actuated tool rentals, Teledrift® tool rentals, and decreased non-actuated tool rentals.decreases in float and motor equipment product sales.
Rental revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2014 increased $1.7 million, or 10.9%, compared to the same period of 2013. This increase can be attributed to an 45.2% increase in actuated tool rental revenue in the Bakken and a 22.9% increase in international Teledrift® tool rentals. Rental revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 decreased by $0.9 million, or 1.9%, compared to the same period of 2013. This decline is due to a 5.1% decrease in Teledrift® domestic tool rental revenue attributed to competitive pricing pressure and decreasing vertical rig counts,
partially offset by an increase of 11.8% in actuated tool and Stemulator® tool rentals for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013. | |
• | Rental revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2015, decreased by $2.0 million, or 14.6%, compared to the same period of 2014. The decrease can be attributed to a decline in actuated tool rental orders and a reduction in Teledrift® tool rental jobs which was due to the drop in the U.S. rig count in the first quarter. Pricing pressure in the market also caused decreased average revenues per job. |
Product sales revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2014March 31, 2015, compared to the same period of 2013 increased2014, decreased by $0.9$2.7 million, or 9.9%35.7%, due to increaseddecreased float equipment, centralizers and centralizer equipmentmotor part sales. Product revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 decreased by $2.8 million, or 9.8%, relative to the same period in 2013, primarily due to decreased international drill pipe sales for the mining industry and decreased domestic motor sales.
| |
• | Service revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2015, decreased $1.5 million, or 42.8%, compared to the same period of 2014. The decrease in service revenue was primarily related to decreased Teledrift® service charges and fees. |
Service revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 decreased $0.2 million, or 4.7%, and $0.5 million, or 4.6%, respectively, relative to comparable periods of 2013. The decrease in service revenue was primarily related to decreased rig service jobs and inspections.
Drilling Technologies gross margin for the three months ended September 30, 2014 increased $1.1March 31, 2015, decreased $3.8 million, or 10.2%38.8%, from the comparable period of 2013,2014. This is primarily due to the revenue factors mentioned above and a 5.4%volume decrease in directthe quarter, motor rental fixed costs, due to lower employee-related compensation costs. Drilling Technologies gross marginand reductions in pricing for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 decreased $2.1 million, or 6.2%, due to the reduction in revenueactuated tools and increased Teledrift® repair expenses. Gross margin as a percentage of revenue remained relatively flat for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014.
Teledrift® tools.
Drilling Technologies income from operations for the three months ended September 30, 2014 increasedMarch 31, 2015, declined by $1.2$4.0 million, or 29.0%, as compared to the same period of 2013. Income from operations as a percentage of revenue increased to 18.6% for the three months ended September 30, 2014, up from 15.6% for the same period of 2013. These increases are primarily due to reductions in direct costs, increased rental activity, and increased product sales. Drilling Technologies income from operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 decreased by $2.4 million, or 15.7%, over the same period of 2013.2014. Income from operations as a percentage of revenue decreased to 15.9%16.7% for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2014, down from 18.0% forMarch 31, 2015, compared to the same period of 2013. These decreases are primarily due to2014. Reduced revenue from lower volumes and pricing, plus fixed depreciation and amortization costs negatively impacted operating income which was partially offset by cost control measures put in place during the decreased revenue explained abovefirst quarter including a 16% reduction in headcount, consolidation of select locations and increased Teledrift® repair expenses.other direct expense controls.
| | Production Technologies (dollars in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended September 30, | | Nine months ended September 30, | | Three months ended March 31, | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2015 | | 2014 | |
Revenue | | $ | 4,947 |
| | $ | 3,857 |
| | $ | 10,093 |
| | $ | 11,953 |
| | $ | 3,573 |
| | $ | 2,267 |
| |
Gross margin | | 2,416 |
| | 1,244 |
| | 4,280 |
| | 4,275 |
| | 730 |
| | 640 |
| |
Gross margin % | | 48.8 | % | | 32.3 | % | | 42.4 | % | | 35.8 | % | | 20.4 | % | | 28.2 | % | |
Income from operations | | 1,583 |
| | 769 |
| | 1,925 |
| | 2,712 |
| |
Income from operations % | | 32.0 | % | | 19.9 | % | | 19.1 | % | | 22.7 | % | |
Income (loss) from operations | | | (539 | ) | | (79 | ) | |
Income (loss) from operations % | | | (15.1 | )% | | (3.5 | )% | |
Production Technologies Results of Operations: Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014March 31, 2015, Compared to the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013March 31, 2014
Revenue for the Production Technologies segment for the three months ended September 30, 2014March 31, 2015, increased by $1.1$1.3 million, or 28.3%57.6%, from the same period in 20132014 due to increased sales of international valves, valve equipment, and domestic hydraulic lifting units. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, revenue decreased by $1.9 million, or 15.6%, relative to the same period in 2013 as sales of pumps androd pump equipment declined.from a new location opened in the third quarter of 2014.
Production Technologies gross margin increased by $1.2$0.1 million, or 94.2%14.1%, for the three months ended September 30, 2014 asMarch 31, 2015, compared to the same period in 2013, and2014, while gross margin as a percentage of revenue declined from 28.2% to 20.4%. The decline was due to product mix and increased direct costs, including salaries and supplies, related to 48.8%the expansion of locations and product lines.
Production Technologies income from operations decreased by $0.5 million, for the three months ended September 30, 2014 from 32.3% for the same period in 2013. These increases are due to product mix from increased international Petrovalve sales and decreased domestic rod pump component sales. Gross margin was flat for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, but gross margin as a percentage of revenue increased to 42.4%, compared to 35.8% for the same period in 2013, primarily due to the higher margins associated with the international valve sales and improving margins on pump equipment.
Income from operations increased by $0.8 million, or 105.9%, for the three months ended September 30, 2014March 31, 2015, compared to the same period in 2013,2014. The decline was due to product mix. Income from operations decreased by $0.8 million, or 29.0%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 compared to the same period in 2013, primarily due to decreases in salesexpense associated with selling and increases in SG&A costs attributable to employee-related expensesR & I activities as the segment continues to refocus and repositionposition itself for growth opportunities in the market. These activities include preparing new product and service offerings to be introduced in 2015, including those associated with the IAL acquisition in January 2015 which are in the process of being introduced commercially.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
There have been no transactions that generate relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as “structured finance” or “special purpose entities” (“SPEs”), established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. As of September 30, 2014March 31, 2015, the Company was not involved in any unconsolidated SPEs.
The Company has not made any guarantees to customers or vendors nor does the Company have any off-balance sheet arrangements or commitments that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future effect on the Company’s financial condition, change in financial condition, revenue, expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that would be material to investors.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Company’s Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Preparation of these statements requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying footnotes. Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 2 of "Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements" and Part II, Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations, “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” of the Company’s Annual Report, and the “Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements” of this Quarterly Report describe the significant accounting policies and critical accounting estimates used to prepare the consolidated financial statements. Critical accounting policies and estimates are defined as those that are both most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations and require management’s most subjective judgments. The Company regularly reviews and challenges judgments, assumptions and estimates related to critical accounting policies. The Company’s estimates and assumptions are based on historical experience and expected changes in the business environment; however, actual results may materially differ from the estimates.
As part of theany acquisition process, the Company reaffirmedreaffirms policies and estimates surrounding business combinationcombinations in accordance with GAAP, specifically utilizing the guidance of Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC"(“ASC”) Topic 805, formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 141R, as amended by FSP SAFAS No. 141(R)-1 which became effective on January 1, 2009.“Business Combinations.” ASC Topic 805 requires an acquiring entity in a transaction to recognize all of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed at fair value at the acquisition date at their estimated fair values on the acquisition date, to recognize and measure pre-acquisition contingencies, including contingent consideration, at fair value (if possible), to remeasure liabilities related to contingent consideration at fair value in each subsequent reporting period and to expense all acquisition relates costs. Though the Company has implementedfollowed business combination accounting guidance, there have been no significant changes in the Company’s critical accounting estimates during the ninethree months ended September 30, 2014.March 31, 2015.
Application of New Accounting Standards
Effective January 1, 2014,2015, the Company adopted the accounting guidance in Accounting Standards Update ("ASU"(“ASU”) No. 2013-11, 2014-08, “"Presentation of Financial Statements and Property, Plant, and Equipment - Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists,"Entity,” which provides guidanceamends the definition of a discontinued operation by raising the threshold for reporting unrecognized tax benefits when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists atdisposal to qualify as discontinued operations. The ASU will also require entities to provide additional disclosures about discontinued operations as well as disposal transactions that do not meet the reporting date. The guidance requires an unrecognized tax benefit to be presented as a decrease in a deferred tax asset where a net operating loss, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists and certain criteria are met.discontinued operations criteria. Implementation of this standard did not have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
New Accounting Requirements and Disclosures
In June 2014,Effective January 1, 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issuedCompany adopted the accounting guidance in ASU No. 2014-12, “ "AccountingAccounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period."” The ASU requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluatingImplementation of this standard did not have a material effect on the potential impacts ofconsolidated financial statements or the new standard onCompany's current awards under its existing stock-based compensation plans.
New Accounting Requirements and Disclosures
In May 2014, the FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2014-09, "“Revenue from Contracts with Customers."” The ASU will supersede most of the existing revenue recognition requirements in U.S. GAAP and will require entities to recognize revenue at an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring goods or services to a customer. The new standard also requires significantly expanded disclosures regarding the qualitative and quantitative information of an entity's nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The
pronouncement is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period and is to be applied retrospectively, with early application not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the pronouncement will have on the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In April 2014,January 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08, 2015-01, “"Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Financial StatementsExtraordinary Items.” This ASU eliminates from generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) the concept of extraordinary items and Property, Plant,the need for an entity to separately classify, present, and Equipment - Reporting Discontinued Operationsdisclose extraordinary events and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity," which amends the definition of a discontinued operation by raising the thresholdtransactions, while retaining certain presentation and disclosure guidance for a disposal to qualify as discontinued operations. The ASU will also require entities to provide additional disclosures about discontinued operations as well as disposal transactionsitems that do not meet the discontinued operations criteria.are unusual in nature or occur infrequently. The pronouncement is effective prospectively for all disposals (except disposals classified as held for sale before the adoption date) of components initially classified as held for sale inannual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014. Early adoption is2015, including interim periods within that reporting period and may be applied retrospectively, with early application permitted. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance and does not expect that adoptionthe impact the pronouncement will have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.statements and related disclosures.
In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-02, “Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis.” The amendment eliminates the deferral of certain consolidation standards for entities considered to be investment companies and modifies the consolidation analysis performed on certain types of legal entities. The pronouncement is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within that reporting period and may be applied retrospectively, with early application permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the pronouncement will have on the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs.” The accounting guidance requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be reported on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability. The pronouncement is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within that reporting period with early application permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the pronouncement will have on the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
Capital Resources and Liquidity
Overview
Ongoing capital requirements arise from the Company’s need to service debt, acquire and maintain equipment, and fund working capital requirements.requirements, and when the opportunities arise, to make strategic acquisitions. During the first ninethree months of 20142015, the Company funded its operating, capital and acquisition requirements primarily withthrough operating cash flows.flows and debt financing.
The Company'sCompany’s primary source of debt financing is its Revolving Credit Facility with PNC Bank. This credit facilityCredit Facility contains provisions for a revolving debtcredit facility of up to $75.0$75 million, based on a borrowing base supported by accounts receivable and inventory, and a term loan secured by substantially all of $50.0 million.the Company’s domestic real and personal property, including accounts receivable, inventory, land, buildings, equipment and other intangible assets. As of September 30, 2014March 31, 2015, the Company had $4.217.3 million in outstanding borrowings under the revolving debt portion of the credit facility and $37.330.8 million outstanding under the term loan. At September 30, 2014March 31, 2015, the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants. Significant terms of the Company’s credit facility are discussed in Part I, Item 1 — "Financial Statements"“Financial Statements” in Note 9 of "Notes“Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements"Statements” in this Quarterly Report.
CashThe Company expects to generate sufficient cash from operations to fund its capital expenditures and make required payments on the term loan. If necessary, the Company will utilize its available capacity under the revolving credit facility to fulfill its liquidity needs. As of March 31, 2015, the Company had available borrowing capacity under its revolving line of credit of $57.5 million and available cash of $2.5 million resulting in total liquidity of $60.0 million. For the remainder of 2015, the Company plans to spend approximately $15 million for committed and planned capital expenditures, inclusive of approximately $8 million for a new R&I facility.
Any excess cash generated may be used to pay down the level of debt, repurchase company stock or be retained for future use. The Company may pursue acquisitions when strategic opportunities arise and may access external financing to fund those acquisitions, if needed.
Net Debt
Net debt represents total debt less cash and cash equivalents totaled $5.3 million at September 30, 2014. Duringand combines the first nine months of 2014,Company’s indebtedness and the Company generated $39.9 million of cash inflows from operations, net of $12.7 million expended in working capital. The Companyand cash equivalents the could be used $16.7 millionto repay that debt. Components of net cash in investing activities, including $13.5 million for capital expenditures and $5.7 million, net of cash acquired, for the purchase of EOGA and SiteLark, partially offset by proceeds of $3.3 million from the sale of assets. Net cash used in financing activities totaled $20.7 million. The Company repaid net draws and term loans on the amended Credit Facility of $12.0 million and $8.5 million, respectively. Additionally, the Company paid $6.1 million in purchases of treasury stock for tax withholding purposes related to vesting of restricted stock awards.debt are as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2015 | | March 31, 2014 |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 2,499 |
| | $ | 1,664 |
|
Current Portion of long-term debt | (24,417 | ) | | (24,068 | ) |
Long-term debt, less current portion | (23,613 | ) | | (30,905 | ) |
Net Debt | $ | (45,531 | ) | | $ | (53,309 | ) |
Cash Flows
Consolidated cash flows by type of activity are noted below (in thousands):
| | | Nine months ended September 30, | Three months ended March 31, |
| 2014 | | 2013 | 2015 | | 2014 |
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 39,897 |
| | $ | 21,360 |
| $ | 6,458 |
| | $ | 15,505 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities | (16,656 | ) | | (58,786 | ) | (5,640 | ) | | (8,704 | ) |
Net cash provided by financing activities | (20,676 | ) | | 39,274 |
| |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | 655 |
| | (7,718 | ) |
Effect of changes in exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents | (38 | ) | | (179 | ) | (240 | ) | | (149 | ) |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | $ | 2,527 |
| | $ | 1,669 |
| $ | 1,233 |
| | $ | (1,066 | ) |
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities was $39.96.5 million and $21.415.5 million during the ninethree months ended September 30,March 31, 2015 and 2014 and 2013, respectively. Consolidated net incomeloss for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2014March 31, 2015, totaled $37.3$1.5 million,, compared to consolidated net income of $25.212.0 million for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2013.March 31, 2014.
During the ninethree months ended September 30,March 31, 2015, net non-cash contributions to net income totaled $4.4 million. Contributory non-cash items consisted of $4.6 million for depreciation and amortization and $3.5 million for stock-based compensation expense. Non-cash reductions to net income included $2.4 million for deferred income taxes, $1.2 million for net gains on asset disposals, $0.1 million for recognized incremental tax benefits related to the Company’s share based awards.
During the three months ended March 31, 2014, net non-cash contributions to net income totaled $15.2 million. Contributory non-cash items consisted of $13.5 million for depreciation and amortization, $7.4 million for stock-based compensation expense and $0.2 million for net decreases in deferred income taxes. Non-cash reductions to net income included $2.6 million for net gains on asset disposals, $3.4 million for recognized incremental tax benefits related to the Company's share based awards.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, net non-cash contributions to net income totaled $15.24.5 million, primarily consisting of $8.72.3 million for stock compensation expense and $11.0$4.2 million for depreciation and amortization, partially offset by $3.50.6 million for net gain on sale of assets, $0.3 million for deferred income taxes, and $0.81.3 million recognized incremental tax benefits related to the Company’s share based awards.
During the ninethree months ended September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015, net working capital was reducedincreased by $12.7 million.$3.5 million. Working capital was used to increase inventorygrew by $18.0decreasing accounts receivable by $22.6 million,, increase decreasing other current assets by $5.0$1.8 million,, and increase accounts receivableincreasing income taxes payable by $3.9 million.$0.5 million. The reductionsadditions to working capital were partially offset by increased inventory of $12.0 million, decreased accounts payable of $12.6$4.8 million, increased income taxes payable of $1.1 million, and increaseddecreased accrued liabilities by $1.0of $4.7 million.
During the ninethree months ended September 30, 2013,March 31, 2014, net working capital was reduceddecreased by $19.01.0 million. Working capital was primarily used to decrease accounts payableaccrued liabilities by $17.3$2.5 million, increase inventoriesinventory by $2.1$9.9 million and increase accounts receivable by $6.5 million, partially offset by a decrease in other current assets of $0.3 million, increase$0.5 million. Offsetting the reductions to working capital were increased income taxes payable of $1.6$4.3 million, increased accounts payable of $6.7 million and an increase in accrued liabilitiesdecreased current assets of $4.9$0.9 million.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $16.75.6 million for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2014.March 31, 2015. Cash used by investing activities in 20142015 were for capital expenditures of $13.55.6 million, and net cash payments for the acquisitions of EOGA, SiteLark,IAL and various patents of $6.5$1.4 million, partially offset by $3.31.3 million forof proceeds received from the sale of fixed assets.
Net cash used in investing activities was $58.88.7 million for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2013.March 31, 2014. Cash used by investing activities in 20132014 were for the acquisition of Florida Chemical in the second quarterEOGA, net of 2013cash received, for $53.4$5.3 million and capital expenditures of $10.04.1 million, partially offset by $4.60.8 million forof proceeds received from the sale of fixed assets.
Financing Activities
Net cash usedgenerated by financing activities was $20.70.7 million for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2014.March 31, 2015, and was primarily due to net proceeds from borrowings, net of repayments of debt, of $4.0 million, proceeds from the sale of common stock of $0.3 million and proceeds from the excess tax benefit related to stock-based compensation of $0.1 million. Cash usedprovided by financing activities was primarily due to $20.6partially offset by $2.7 million for repaymentsthe repurchase of debt, net of borrowings,common stock and $6.11.1 million for purchases of treasury stock for tax withholding purposes related to vesting of restricted stock awards, and debt issuance costsawards.
During the three months ended March 31, 2014, financing activities used net cash of $0.37.7 million. Cash used by financing activities included repayment of debt, net of borrowings, of $7.1 million and the purchase of treasury stock for tax withholding purposes related to vesting of restricted stocks awards of $4.0 million. Cash used by financing activities was partially offset by proceeds from the exercise of stock warrants of $1.5 million, proceeds from the excess tax benefit related to stock-based compensation of $3.4 million, proceeds from the sale of common stock of $0.8 million and proceeds from the exercise of stock options of $0.5 million.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, financing activities provided net cash of $39.3 million. Financing activities included proceeds from borrowings, net of repayments of debt, of $43.8 million, proceeds from the excess tax benefit related to stock-based compensation of $0.8 million, proceeds from the sale of common stock of $0.6$1.3 million and proceeds from the exercise of stock options of $0.5 million. Cash provided by financing activities was partially offset by purchases of treasury stock of $5.3 million and debt issuance costs of $1.2$0.4 million.
Although the Company has no immediate intention to access the capital markets, the Company intends to file a "universal"“universal” shelf registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission in the future. This shelf registration statement will register the issuance and sale from time to time of various securities by the Company, including but not limited to senior notes, subordinated notes, preferred stock, common stock, and warrants. Once this shelf registration statement is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and becomes effective, the Company will have the financial flexibility to access the capital markets quickly and efficiently from time to time as the need may arise.
Contractual Obligations
Cash flows from operations are dependent on a variety of factors, including fluctuations in operating results, accounts receivable collections, inventory management, and the timing of payments for goods and services. Correspondingly, the impact of contractual obligations on the Company’s liquidity and capital resources in future periods is analyzed in conjunction with such factors.
Material contractual obligations consist of repayment of amounts borrowed on the Company'sCompany’s Credit Facility with PNC Bank and payment of operating lease obligations. Contractual obligations at September 30, 2014March 31, 2015, are as follows (in thousands):
| | | | Payments Due by Period | | Payments Due by Period |
| | Total | | Less than 1 year | | 1 - 3 years | | 3 - 5 years | | More than 5 years | | Total | | Less than 1 year | | 1 - 3 years | | 3 - 5 years | | More than 5 years |
Term loan | | $ | 37,327 |
| | $ | 7,143 |
| | $ | 14,286 |
| | $ | 15,898 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 30,756 |
| | $ | 7,143 |
| | $ | 14,286 |
| | $ | 9,327 |
| | $ | — |
|
Interest expense on term loan (1) | | 3,887 |
| | 1,330 |
| | 2,101 |
| | 456 |
| | — |
| | 2,869 |
| | 1,258 |
| | 1,532 |
| | 79 |
| | — |
|
Borrowings under revolving credit facility (2) | | 4,224 |
| | 4,224 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 17,274 |
| | 17,274 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Operating lease obligations | | 25,247 |
| | 2,123 |
| | 4,962 |
| | 3,843 |
| | 14,319 |
| | 24,787 |
| | 2,621 |
| | 4,828 |
| | 3,841 |
| | 13,497 |
|
Total | | $ | 70,685 |
| | $ | 14,820 |
| | $ | 21,349 |
| | $ | 20,197 |
| | $ | 14,319 |
| | $ | 75,686 |
| | $ | 28,296 |
| | $ | 20,646 |
| | $ | 13,247 |
| | $ | 13,497 |
|
(1) Interest expense amounts assume interest rates on this variable rate obligation remain unchanged from September 30, 2014March 31, 2015 rates. The weighted-average interest rate is 2.43%2.46% at September 30, 2014.March 31, 2015.
(2) The borrowing is classified as current debt. The weighted-average interest rate is 1.77%2.43% at September 30, 2014March 31, 2015.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates and, to a limited extent, commodity prices and foreign currency exchange rates. There have been no material changes to the quantitative or qualitative disclosures about market risk set forth in Part II, Item 7A of the Company’s Annual Report.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company'sCompany’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC'sSEC’s rules and forms. The Company'sCompany’s disclosure controls and procedures are also designed to ensure such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance that control objectives are attained. The Company'sCompany’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide such reasonable assurance.
The Company'sCompany’s management, with the participation of the principal executive and principal financial officers, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company'sCompany’s disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015, as required by Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, the principal executive and principal financial officers have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2014.March 31, 2015.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in the Company'sCompany’s system of internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended September 30, 2014March 31, 2015 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Litigation
The Company is subject to routine litigation and other claims that arise in the normal course of business. Management is not aware of any pending or threatened lawsuits or proceedings that are expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
EPA Environmental Proceeding
On January 9, 2015, FC Pro LLC (“FC Pro”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, received a letter and proposed consent agreement and final order from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) concerning alleged violations of the federal hazardous waste regulations at FC Pro’s specialty chemical blending facility in Waller, Texas. Specifically, EPA alleged that FC Pro failed to comply with certain notification, operating, and reporting requirements applicable to generators or large quantity generators of hazardous waste. FC Pro has resolved the alleged violations pursuant to a consent agreement and final order under which it did not admit or deny the allegations and agreed to pay an administrative penalty of $410,868, obtain an EPA identification number, and develop certain specified operating procedures. The consent agreement and final order has been signed by EPA and will become final upon being ratified by the regional judicial officer. Since this enforcement case was initiated, FC Pro has made changes to its operating practices at its Waller facility that it believes has resulted in it no longer generating hazardous waste at that facility.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes to the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Issuance of Shares of Common Stock
On January 27, 2015, the Company issued shares of its common stock pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of January 27, 2015, by and among the Company and International Artificial Lift, LLC as follows:
|
| | |
| Number of Shares |
Larry Best | 18,457 |
|
Ronnie Brown | 18,457 |
|
Clayton Brown | 6,002 |
|
Rudolph J. Renda | 9,004 |
|
Tiburon Oil & Gas, Inc. | 1,501 |
|
Scott Briggs | 3,602 |
|
Jim Shaw | 3,001 |
|
Total | 60,024 |
|
The issuance of shares was exempt from registration pursuant to Regulation D or Section 4(2) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as such issuances were made in transactions not involving a public offering. The shares of common stock were issued at an effective price of $16.89 per share.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Repurchases of the Company'sCompany’s equity securities during the three months ended September 30, 2014March 31, 2015 are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased (1) | | Average Price Paid per Share | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | | Maximum Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (2) |
July 1, 2014 to July 31, 2014 | 1,777 |
| | $ | 33.44 |
| | — |
| | $ | 25,000,000 |
|
August 1, 2014 to August 31, 2014 | 7,051 |
| | $ | 27.91 |
| | — |
| | $ | 25,000,000 |
|
September 1, 2014 to September 30, 2014 | 326 |
| | $ | 27.20 |
| | — |
| | $ | 25,000,000 |
|
Total | 9,154 |
| | $ | — |
| | — |
| |
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period | | Total Number of Shares Purchased (1) | | Average Price Paid per Share | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | | Maximum Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (2) |
January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 | | 20,188 |
| | $ | 16.55 |
| | — |
| | $ | 14,604,569 |
|
February 1, 2015 to February 28, 2015 | | 36,852 |
| | $ | 17.30 |
| | — |
| | $ | 14,604,569 |
|
March 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 | | 209,075 |
| | $ | 14.79 |
| | 180,190 |
| | $ | 11,953,728 |
|
Total | | 266,115 |
| | $ | 15.27 |
| | 180,190 |
| |
|
|
(1) The Company purchased shares of its common stock (a) to satisfy tax withholding requirements and payment remittance obligations related to period vesting of restricted shares and exercise of non-qualified stock options, and (b) to satisfy payments required for common stock upon the exercise of stock options.options, and (c) as part of a publicly announce repurchase program.
(2) In November 2012, the Company'sCompany’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $25 million of the Company'sCompany’s common stock. Repurchases may be made in open market or privately negotiated transactions. Through September 30, 2014March 31, 2015, the Company has not repurchased any$13.0 million of its common stock under this repurchase program and $25$12.0 million may yet be used to purchase shares.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
|
| | | |
Exhibit Number | | Description of Exhibit |
3.1 |
| | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company'sCompany’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007). |
3.2 |
| | Certificate of Designations for Series A Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock dated August 11, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company'sCompany’s Form 8-K filed on August 17, 2009). |
3.3 |
| | Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company'sCompany’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009). |
3.4 |
| | Amended and Restated Bylaws, dated December 9, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Appendix FExhibit 3.1 to the Company's Definitive Proxy StatementCompany’s Form 8-K filed on September 27, 2001)December 10, 2014). |
4.1 |
| | Form of Certificate of Common Stock (incorporated by reference to Appendix E to the Company'sCompany’s Definitive Proxy Statement filed on September 27, 2001). |
4.2 |
| | Form of Certificate of Series A Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Certificate of Designations for Series A Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company'sCompany’s Form 8-K filed on August 17, 2009). |
4.3 |
| | Form of Warrant to Purchase Common Stock of the Company, dated August 31, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company'sCompany’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (File No. 333-129308) filed on October 28, 2005). |
4.4 |
| | Form of Exercisable Warrant, dated August 11, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company'sCompany’s Form 8-K filed on August 17, 2009). |
4.5 |
| | Form of Contingent Warrant, dated August 11, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company'sCompany’s Form 8-K filed on August 17, 2009). |
4.6 |
| | Amendment to Warrant to Purchase Common Stock, dated as of June 14, 2012, by and among the Company and each of the holders party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company'sCompany’s Form 8-K filed on June 18, 2012). |
4.7 |
| | Amendment to Amended and Restated Warrant to Purchase Common Stock, dated as of February 5, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company'sCompany’s Form 8-K filed on February 11, 2014). |
10.1 |
| | Employment Agreement, dated effective December 31, 2014 between the Company and Steve Reeves (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on January 7, 2015). |
31.1 |
| * | Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer. |
31.2 |
| * | Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer. |
32.1 |
| * | Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer. |
32.2 |
| * | Section 1350 Certification of Principal Financial Officer. |
101.INS |
| ** | XBRL Instance Document. |
101.SCH |
| ** | XBRL Schema Document. |
101.CAL |
| ** | XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document. |
101.LAB |
| ** | XBRL Label Linkbase Document. |
101.PRE |
| ** | XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document. |
101.DEF |
| ** | XBRL Definition Linkbase Document. |
| | |
* |
| | Filed herewith. |
** |
| | Furnished with this Form 10-Q, not filed. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
| | |
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. |
| |
By: | | /s/ JOHN W. CHISHOLM |
| | John W. Chisholm |
| | President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board |
Date: OctoberApril 22, 20142015
|
| | |
FLOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. |
| |
By: | | /s/ H. RICHARD WALTON |
| | H. Richard Walton |
| | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Date: OctoberApril 22, 20142015