

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X]	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

	For the quarterly period ended March 31, ~~2018~~2019

or
[ ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to ____________

Commission File Number: 001-33652


FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Washington		26-0610707
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

201 Wells Avenue South, Renton, Washington		98057
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:		(425) 255-4400

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YES X NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically ~~and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,~~ every Interactive Data File required to be submitted ~~and posted~~ pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit ~~and post~~ such files).

YES X NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company”, and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large accelerated filer _____	Accelerated filer X	Non-accelerated filer _____
Smaller reporting company _____	Emerging growth company _____

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. _____

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

YES NO X

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:



Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share	FFNW	The Nasdaq Stock Market, LLC

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: as of May ~~6, 2018, 10,779,424~~7, 2019, 10,375,325 shares of the issuer’s common stock, $0.01 par value per share, were outstanding.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC.

FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS



			Page
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Financial Statements	3
	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	3433
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	5048
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	5352
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	5452
	Item 1A.	Risk Factors	5452
	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	5452
	Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities	5453
	Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	5453
	Item 5.	Other Information	5453
	Item 6.	Exhibits	5554
SIGNATURES			5655

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Dollars in thousands, except share data)

Part 1. Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements


	March 31, 2018			December 31, 2017			March 31, 2019			December 31, 2018
Assets
	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
Cash on hand and in banks	$	6,595		$	9,189		$	9,366		$	8,122
Interest-earning deposits with banks	13,954			6,942			14,596			8,888
Investments available-for-sale, at fair value	142,872			132,242			138,658			142,170
Loans receivable, net of allowance of $13,136 and $12,882	991,138			988,662
Loans receivable, net of allowance of $13,808 and $13,347							1,051,711			1,022,904
Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") stock, at cost	9,450			9,882			8,041			7,310
Accrued interest receivable	3,981			4,084			4,861			4,068
Deferred tax assets, net	1,362			1,211			1,728			1,844
Other real estate owned ("OREO")	483			483			454			483
Premises and equipment, net	21,208			20,614			21,370			21,331
Bank owned life insurance ("BOLI"), net	29,276			29,027			30,162			29,841
Prepaid expenses and other assets	3,922			5,738			4,947			3,458
Goodwill	889			889			889			889
Core deposit intangible	1,228			1,266			1,079			1,116
Total assets	$	1,226,358		$	1,210,229		$	1,287,862		$	1,252,424

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing deposits	$	48,135		$	45,434		$	46,026		$	46,108
Interest-bearing deposits	815,094			794,068			909,246			892,924
Total deposits	863,229			839,502			955,272			939,032
FHLB Advances	200,000			216,000
FHLB advances							163,500			146,500
Advance payments from borrowers for taxes and insurance	4,478			2,515			5,374			2,933
Accrued interest payable	270			326			478			478
Other liabilities	9,626			9,252			11,554			9,743
Total liabilities	1,077,603			1,067,595			1,136,178			1,098,686

Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders' Equity
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; authorized 10,000,000 shares; no shares issued or outstanding	—			—			—			—
Common stock, $0.01 par value; authorized 90,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 10,779,424 shares at March 31, 2018, and 10,748,437 shares at December 31, 2017	108			107
Common stock, $0.01 par value; authorized 90,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 10,457,625 shares at March 31, 2019, and 10,710,656 shares at December 31, 2018							104			107
Additional paid-in capital	94,527			94,173			89,800			93,773
Retained earnings, substantially restricted	60,767			54,642
Retained earnings							67,568			66,343
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax	(1,568		)	(928		)	(1,838		)	(2,253		)
Unearned Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP") shares	(5,079		)	(5,360		)	(3,950		)	(4,232		)
Total stockholders' equity	148,755			142,634			151,684			153,738
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	1,226,358		$	1,210,229		$	1,287,862		$	1,252,424

See accompanying selected notes to consolidated financial statements.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Income Statements

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended March 31,					Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018			2017		2019			2018
Interest income
Loans, including fees	$	13,042		$	10,027	$	13,281		$	13,042
Investments available-for-sale	929			845		1,159			929
Interest-earning deposits with banks	38			44		40			38
Dividends on FHLB stock	104			82		91			104
Total interest income	14,113			10,998		14,571			14,113
Interest expense
Deposits	2,276			1,691		3,822			2,276
FHLB advances and other borrowings	853			445		897			853
Total interest expense	3,129			2,136		4,719			3,129
Net interest income	10,984			8,862		9,852			10,984
(Recapture of provision) provision for loan losses	(4,000		)	200
Net interest income after (recapture of provision) provision for loan losses	14,984			8,662
Provision (recapture of provision) for loan losses						400			(4,000		)
Net interest income after provision (recapture of provision) for loan losses						9,452			14,984
Noninterest income
Net loss on sale of investments						(8		)	—
BOLI income	249			201		269			249
Wealth management revenue	99			140		196			99
Deposit related fees	161			71		171			161
Loan related fees	134			120		63			134
Other	3			3		9			3
Total noninterest income	646			535		700			646
Noninterest expense
Salaries and employee benefits	4,662			4,285		5,000			4,662
Occupancy and equipment	769			480		866			769
Professional fees	328			439		496			328
Data processing	324			240		518			324
OREO related expenses, net	1			40		31			1
Regulatory assessments	155			96		137			155
Insurance and bond premiums	106			99		105			106
Marketing	107			48		86			107
Other general and administrative	575			341		470			575
Total noninterest expense	7,027			6,068		7,709			7,027
Income before federal income tax provision	8,603			3,129		2,443			8,603
Federal income tax provision	1,761			785		498			1,761
Net income	$	6,842		$	2,344	$	1,945		$	6,842
Basic earnings per common share	$	0.67		$	0.23	$	0.19		$	0.67
Diluted earnings per common share	$	0.66		$	0.22	$	0.19		$	0.66
Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding	10,210,828			10,319,722		10,118,286			10,210,828
Diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding	10,336,566			10,504,046		10,220,900			10,336,566

See accompanying selected notes to consolidated financial statements.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018			2017			2019			2018
Net income	$	6,842		$	2,344		$	1,945		$	6,842
Other comprehensive income, before tax:
Unrealized holding (losses) gains on investments available-for-sale	(1,473		)	377
Unrealized holding gain (loss) on investments available-for-sale							976			(1,473		)
Tax (provision) benefit							(205		)	309
Reclassification adjustment for net losses realized in income							8			—
Tax provision							(1		)	—
(Loss) gain on cash flow hedge							(460		)	663
Tax benefit (provision)	309			(132		)	97			(139		)
Gain on cash flow hedge	663			63
Tax provision	(139		)	(22		)
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax	$	(640	)	$	286
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax							415			(640		)
Total comprehensive income	$	6,202		$	2,630		$	2,360		$	6,202

See accompanying selected notes to consolidated financial statements.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

(Dollars in thousands except share data)

(Unaudited)

Shares Common Stock Additional Paid-in Capital Retained Earnings
Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income,
net of tax

Unearned
ESOP
Shares
Total Stockholders’ Equity
Balances at December 31, 2016 10,938,251
$ 109
$ 96,852
$ 48,981
$ (1,328 ) $ (6,489 ) $ 138,125
Net income —
—
—
2,344
—
—
2,344
Other comprehensive income —
—
—
—
286
—
286
Exercise of stock options 97,540
1
953
—
—
—
954
Compensation related to stock options and restricted stock awards —
—
110
—
—
—
110
Allocation of 28,214 ESOP shares —
—
271
—
—
282
553
Cash dividend declared and paid ($0.06 per share) —
—
—
(623 ) —
—
(623 )
Balances at March 31, 2017 11,035,791
$ 110
$ 98,186
$ 50,702
$ (1,042 ) $ (6,207 ) $ 141,749



	Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
	Shares	Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital		Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, net of tax			Unearned ESOP Shares			Total Stockholders’ Equity
Balances at December 31, 2017	10,748,437	$	107	$	94,173	$	54,642		$	(928	)	$	(5,360	)	$	142,634
Net income	—	—		—		6,842			—			—			6,842
Other comprehensive (loss) income	—	—		—		—			(640		)	—			(640		)
Exercise of stock options	10,000	—		98		—			—			—			98
Issuance of common stock - restricted stock awards, net	20,987	1		—		—			—			—			1
Compensation related to stock options and restricted stock awards	—	—		83		—			—			—			83
Allocation of 28,213 ESOP shares	—	—		173		—			—			281			454
Cash dividend declared and paid ($0.07 per share)	—	—		—		(717		)	—			—			(717		)
Balances at March 31, 2018	10,779,424	$	108	$	94,527	$	60,767		$	(1,568	)	$	(5,079	)	$	148,755

Shares Common
Stock Additional
Paid-in
Capital Retained
Earnings Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income, net of tax Unearned
ESOP
Shares Total
Stockholders' Equity
Balances at December 31, 2017 10,748,437
$ 107
$ 94,173
$ 54,642
$ (928 ) $ (5,360 ) $ 142,634
Net income —
—
—
6,842
—
—
6,842
Other comprehensive (loss) income —
—
—
—
(640 ) —
(640 )
Exercise of stock options 10,000
—
98
—
—
—
98
Issuance of common stock - restricted stock awards, net 20,987
1
—
—
—
—
1
Compensation related to stock options and restricted stock awards —
—
83
—
—
—
83
Allocation of 28,213 ESOP shares —
—
173
—
—
281
454
Cash dividend declared and paid ($0.07 per share) —
—
—
(717 ) —
—
(717 )
Balances at March 31, 2018 10,779,424
$ 108
$ 94,527
$ 60,767
$ (1,568 ) $ (5,079 ) $ 148,755



	Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
	Shares		Common Stock			Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, net of tax			Unearned ESOP Shares			Total Stockholders' Equity
Balances at December 31, 2018	10,710,656		$	107		$	93,773		$	66,343		$	(2,253	)	$	(4,232	)	$	153,738
Net income	—		—			—			1,945			—			—			1,945
Other comprehensive income	—		—			—			—			415			—			415
Issuance of common stock - restricted stock awards, net	16,698		—			(93		)	—			—			—			(93		)
Compensation related to stock options and restricted stock awards	—		—			124			—			—			—			124
Allocation of 28,213 ESOP shares	—		—			163			—			—			282			445
Repurchase and retirement of common stock	(263,800	)	(3		)	(4,167		)	—			—			—			(4,170		)
Canceled common stock - restricted stock awards	(5,929	)	—			—			—			—			—			—
Cash dividend declared and paid ($0.08 per share)	—		—			—			(807		)	—			—			(807		)
Beginning balance adjustment from adoption of Topic 842	—		—			—			87			—			—			87
Balances at March 31, 2019	10,457,625		$	104		$	89,800		$	67,568		$	(1,838	)	$	(3,950	)	$	151,684

See accompanying selected notes to consolidated financial statements.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018			2017			2019			2018
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	6,842		$	2,344		$	1,945		$	6,842
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
(Recapture of provision) provision for loan losses	(4,000		)	200
Provision (recapture of provision) for loan losses							400			(4,000		)
OREO market value adjustments	—			50			29			—
Net amortization of premiums and discounts on investments	274			167			193			274
Loss on sale of investments available-for-sale							8			—
Depreciation of premises and equipment	401			260			427			401
Deferred federal income taxes	19			81			7			19
Allocation of ESOP shares	454			553			445			454
Stock compensation expense	84			110			124			84
Increase in cash surrender value of BOLI	(249		)	(201		)	(269		)	(249		)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses and other assets	2,517			(165		)
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets							(1,912		)	2,517
Net increase in advance payments from borrowers for taxes and insurance	1,963			1,833			2,441			1,963
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable	103			(242		)
(Decrease) increase in accrued interest payable	(56		)	6
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable							(793		)	103
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable							—			(56		)
Increase in other liabilities	374			242			1,898			374
Net cash provided by operating activities	8,726			5,238			4,943			8,726
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from calls and maturities of investments available-for-sale	2,000			26
Proceeds from sales, calls and maturities of investments available-for-sale							2,995			2,000
Principal repayments on investments available-for-sale	1,601			2,790			1,300			1,601
Purchases of investments available-for-sale	(15,978		)	(3,008		)	—			(15,978		)
Net decrease (increase) in loans receivable	1,524			(23,925		)
Purchase (redemption) of FHLB stock	432			(71		)
Net (increase) decrease in loans receivable							(29,207		)	1,524
(Purchase) redemption of FHLB stock							(731		)	432
Purchase of premises and equipment	(995		)	(711		)	(466		)	(995		)
Purchase of BOLI	—			(3,180		)	(52		)	—
Net cash used by investing activities	(11,416		)	(28,079		)	(26,161		)	(11,416		)

Continued

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)



	Three Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018			2017			2019			2018
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase in deposits	$	23,727		$	17,231		$	16,240		$	23,727
Advances from the FHLB	140,000			—			71,500			140,000
Repayments of advances from the FHLB	(156,000		)	—			(54,500		)	(156,000		)
Proceeds from stock options exercises	98			954			—			98
Net share settlement of stock awards							(93		)	—
Repurchase and retirement of common stock							(4,170		)	—
Dividends paid	(717		)	(623		)	(807		)	(717		)
Net cash provided by financing activities	7,108			17,562			28,170			7,108
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	4,418			(5,279		)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents							6,952			4,418
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	16,131			31,352			17,010			16,131
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	20,549		$	26,073		$	23,962		$	20,549

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest paid	$	3,185		$	2,130		$	4,719		$	3,185

Noncash items:
Change in unrealized loss on investments available-for-sale	$	(1,473	)	$	377		$	984		$	(1,473	)
Change in gain on cash flow hedge	$	663		$	63		(460		)	663

See accompanying selected notes to consolidated financial statements.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 1 - Description of Business

First Financial Northwest, Inc. (“First Financial Northwest”), a Washington corporation, was formed on June 1, 2007 for the purpose of becoming the holding company for First Financial Northwest Bank (the “Bank”) in connection with the conversion from a mutual holding company structure to a stock holding company structure completed on October 9, 2007. First Financial Northwest’s business activities generally are limited to passive investment activities and oversight of its investment in First Financial Northwest Bank. Accordingly, the information presented in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying data, relates primarily to First Financial Northwest Bank. First Financial Northwest is a bank holding company, having converted from a savings and loan holding company on March 31, 2015, and as a bank holding company is subject to regulation by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. First Financial Northwest Bank is regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and the Washington State Department of Financial Institutions (“DFI”).

~~As of~~At March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, First Financial Northwest Bank ~~had nine~~operated in eleven locations in Washington with the headquarters and ~~three additional~~six branch locations in King County and five branch locations in Snohomish County. The Bank acquired four bank branches (one in King and three in Snohomish counties) and $74.7 million in retail deposits from Opus Bank on August 25, 2017. No loans were acquired in this transaction. The Bank’s tenth branch opened in Bothell, Washington, in April 2018. The Bank’s primary market area consists of King, Snohomish, Pierce and Kitsap counties, Washington. The Bank has received FDIC approval to open an additional branch in Kirkland, Washington, which is expected to open later in 2019.

The Bank is a portfolio lender, originating and purchasing one-to-four family residential, multifamily, commercial real estate, construction/land development, business, and consumer loans. Loans are primarily funded by deposits from the general public, supplemented by borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines (“FHLB”) and deposits raised in the national brokered deposit market.

As used throughout this report, the terms “we,” “our,” “us,” or the “Company” refer to First Financial Northwest, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiary First Financial Northwest Bank, unless the context otherwise requires.

Note 2 - Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, as filed with the ~~SEC.~~SEC (“2018 Form 10-K”). In our opinion, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP have been included. All significant intercompany balances and transactions between the Company and its subsidiaries have been eliminated in consolidation. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. In preparing the unaudited consolidated financial statements, we are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change relate to the allowance for loan and lease losses (“ALLL”), the valuation of other real estate owned (“OREO”) and the underlying collateral of impaired loans, deferred tax assets, the right-of-use asset and lease liability on our operating leases, and the fair value of financial instruments.

The Company’s activities are considered to be a single industry segment for financial reporting purposes. The Company is engaged in the business of attracting deposits from the general public and originating and purchasing loans for its portfolio. Substantially all income is derived from a diverse base of commercial, multifamily, and residential real estate loans, consumer lending activities, and investments.

Certain amounts in the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current unaudited financial statement presentation with no effect on consolidated net income or stockholders’ equity.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 3 - Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in ~~2018~~

~~In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-09,~~ ~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). In August 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14,~~ ~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)~~ ~~which postponed the effective date of 2014-09. Subsequently, in March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08,~~ ~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations.~~ This amendment clarifies that an entity should determine if it is the principal or the agent for each specified good or service promised in a contract with a customer. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10~~, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing.~~ The core principle of Topic 606 is that an entity must recognize revenue when it has satisfied a performance obligation of transferring promised goods or services to a customer. These standards were effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company has analyzed its sources of noninterest income to determine when the satisfaction of the performance obligation occurs and the appropriate recognition of revenue. The adoption of these ASUs did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. For more discussion on this topic, see Note 12 - Revenue Recognition in this report.

~~In January 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01,~~ ~~Financial Instruments - Overall, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.~~ ASU 2016-01 requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. In addition, the amendments in this ASU require an entity to disclose the fair value of its financial instruments using the exit price notion. Exit price is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The amendments in this ASU were effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company has updated the fair value disclosure on Note 7 in this report to reflect adoption of this standard, to include using the exit price notion in the fair value disclosure of financial instruments. The adoption of ASU 2016-01 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. This ASU addresses the appropriate classification of eight specific cash flow issues on the cash flow statement. Debt prepayment costs should be classified as an outflow for financing activities. Settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments divides the interest portion as an outflow for operating activities and the principal portion as an outflow for financing activities. Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination should be classified as outflows for financing and operating activities. Proceeds from the settlement of bank-owned life insurance policies should be classified as inflows from investing activities. Other specific areas are identified in the ASU as to the appropriate classification of the cash inflows or outflows. The amendments in this ASU were effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not currently have items on its cash flow statement that were impacted by adoption of this ASU and therefore adoption of ASU 2016-15 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805). This ASU clarifies the definition of a business to assist in determining whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The amendments in this ASU provide a screen to determine when a set of assets and activities is not a business, thereby reducing the number of transactions requiring further evaluation. If the screen is not met, the amendments in this ASU further provide a framework to evaluate if the criteria is present to qualify for a business. This ASU was effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Adoption of ASU 2017-01 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2017, FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting. The ASU was issued to provide clarity as to when to apply modification accounting when there is a change in the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. According to this ASU, an entity should account for the effects of a modification unless the fair value, vesting conditions, and balance sheet classification of the award is the same after the modification as compared to the original award prior to the modification. This ASU was effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company has not had any modifications on share-based payment awards and therefore the adoption of ASU No. 2017-09 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

~~In February 2018, FASB issued ASU 2018-02,~~ ~~Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220).~~ This ASU was issued to allow a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings from stranded tax effects resulting from the revaluation of the net deferred tax asset (“DTA”) to the new corporate tax rate of 21% as a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. This ASU is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption

~~FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

permitted. The Company adopted this ASU as of December 31, 2017, which resulted in reclassifying a net unrealized gain from the change in tax rate with an increase to accumulated other comprehensive income and a decrease to retained earnings by $41,000, respectively.

~~In March 2018, FASB issued ASU No. 2018-05,~~ ~~Income Taxes (Topic 740).~~ This ASU was issued to provide guidance on the income tax accounting implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, and allows for entities to report provisional amounts for specific income tax effects of the Act for which the accounting under Topic 740 was not yet complete but a reasonable estimate could be determined. A measurement period of one-year is allowed to complete the accounting effects under Topic 740 and revise any previous estimates reported. Any provisional amounts or subsequent adjustments included in an entity’s financial statements during the measurement period should be included in income from continuing operations as an adjustment to tax expense in the reporting period the amounts are determined. The Company adopted this ASU with the provisional adjustments as reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements on Form 10-K as of December 31, 2017. As of March 31, 2018, the Company did not incur any adjustments to the provisional recognition.

~~Recent Accounting Pronouncements~~2019

In February 2016, ~~FASB~~the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ~~ASU~~Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). ASU No. 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities arising from operating leases. AIn July 2018, FASB issued ASU No. 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842) to address the comparative reporting requirements when this ASU is adopted. In March 2019, FASB issued ASU 2019-01, Leases (Topic 842), Codification Improvements. Under these ASUs, a lessee should recognize a liability to make lease payments and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. A lessee should include payments to be made in an optional period only if the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise an option to extend the lease or not to exercise an option to terminate the lease. For a finance lease, interest payments should be recognized separately from amortization of the right-of-use asset in the statement of comprehensive income. For operating leases, the lease cost should be allocated over the lease term on a generally straight-line basis. The ~~amendments in~~Company adopted this ASU on January 1, 2019 and according to ASU 2018-11, elected to recognize the related cumulative-effect adjustment as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. Adoption of ASU 2016-02 ~~are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application of the amendments~~resulted in the ~~ASU is permitted. The effect~~addition of ~~the adoption will depend on leases at the time of adoption. Once adopted, we expect to report higher assets~~a right-of-use asset and ~~liabilities as a result of including right-of-use assets and~~ lease ~~liabilities~~ related to certain banking offices under noncancelable operating lease ~~agreements, however, based on current leases, the adoption is expected to~~agreements. The resulting increase ~~our consolidated balance sheets by less than 5% and~~did not to have a material impact on ~~our~~the Company’s consolidated financial statements or regulatory capital ratios. For more information see Note 8 ‑ Leases in this report.

In March 2017, FASB issued ASU No. 2017-08, Receivables - Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities. The ASU shortens the amortization period for certain callable debt securities held at a premium. The Company adopted this ASU during the quarter ended March 31, 2019 with no material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326). This ASU replaces the existing incurred loss impairment methodology that recognizes credit losses when a probable loss has been incurred with new methodology where loss estimates are based upon lifetime expected credit losses. The amendments in this ASU require a financial asset that is measured at amortized cost to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. The income statement would then reflect the measurement of credit losses for newly recognized financial assets as well as changes to the expected credit losses that have taken place during the reporting period. The measurement of expected credit losses will be based on historical information, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that impact the collectability of the reported amount. ~~Available-for-sale~~Available‑for‑sale securities will bifurcate the fair value mark and establish an allowance for credit losses through the income statement for the credit portion of that mark. The interest portion will continue to be recognized through accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. The change in allowance recognized as a result of adoption will occur through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the ASU is adopted. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is evaluating our current expected loss methodology of our loan and investment portfolios to identify the necessary modifications in accordance with this standard and expects a change in the processes and procedures to calculate the ALLL, including changes in assumptions and estimates to consider expected credit losses over the life of the loan versus the current accounting practice that utilizes the incurred loss model. A valuation adjustment to our ALLL or investment portfolio that is identified in this process will be reflected as a one-time adjustment in equity rather than earnings. We are in the process of compiling historical and industry data that will be used to calculate expected credit losses on our loan portfolio to ensure we are fully compliant with the ASU at the adoption date and are evaluating the potential impact adoption of this ASU will have on our consolidated financial statements. The Company intends to adopt ASU 2016-13 in the first quarter of 2020, and as a result, we expect our allowance for loan losses to increase. Until our evaluation is complete, however, the magnitude of the increase will not be ~~unknown.~~known.

In ~~January 2017,~~August 2018, FASB issued ASU No. ~~2017-04,~~2018-13, ~~Intangibles~~Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) - ~~Goodwill and Other (Topic 350).~~Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. This ASU simplifies the impairment calculation for subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating the step of comparing the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. Under theThe amendments in this ASU ~~an entity will evaluate the carrying amount~~remove certain disclosure requirements regarding transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of ~~a reporting unit to its fair value, as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. An impairment charge should be recognized for the amount that the carrying amount exceeds~~ the fair value hierarchy and changes in unrealized gains and losses for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements. In addition, the amendments modified and added certain disclosure requirements for Level 3 fair value measurements. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and early adoption is permitted. Entities are permitted to early adopt any removed or modified disclosures and adopt the additional disclosures at the effective date. Adoption of ASU 2018-13 is not expected to ~~exceed~~have a material impact on the ~~amount~~Company’s consolidated financial statements.

1110

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

of goodwill. The income tax effect should be considered for any tax deductible goodwill when measuring the impairment loss. The amendments in this ASU are effective for goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for reporting periods after January 1, 2017. The Company recognized goodwill from its recent branch acquisition and is adopting this ASU for the annual goodwill impairment test in 2018. Adoption of ASU 2017-04 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

~~In March 2017, FASB issued ASU No. 2017-08,~~ ~~Receivables - Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities~~. The ASU shortens the amortization period for certain callable debt securities held at a premium. The standard will take effect for SEC filers for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating its available-for-sale securities that fit the criteria of this ASU but has not yet quantified the impact. The adoption of ASU No. 2017-08 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

~~In August 2017, FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12,~~ ~~Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815).~~ This ASU was issued to provide investors better insight to an entity’s risk management hedging strategies by permitting companies to recognize the economic results of its hedging strategies in its financial statements. The amendments in this ASU permit hedge accounting for hedging relationships involving non-financial risk and interest rate risk by removing certain limitations in cash flow and fair value hedging relationships. In addition, the ASU requires an entity to present the earnings effect of the hedging instrument in the same income statement line item in which the earnings effect of the hedged item is reported. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and early adoption is permitted. The Company intends to adopt this ASU during 2018, however its current cash flow hedge will not likely be impacted by the adoption of ASU 2017-12, and consequently, is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Note 4 - Investments

Investments available-for-sale are summarized as follows at the dates indicated:


	March 31, 2018									March 31, 2019
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
	(In thousands)									(In thousands)
Mortgage-backed investments:
Fannie Mae	$	29,532	$	26	$	(863	)	$	28,695	$	23,967	$	89	$	(370	)	$	23,686
Freddie Mac	5,469		3		(103		)	5,369		6,310		27		(18		)	6,319
Ginnie Mae	21,982		11		(1,094		)	20,899		23,053		10		(1,050		)	22,013
Other										8,925		47		(19		)	8,953
Municipal bonds	13,090		52		(97		)	13,045		7,619		169		(21		)	7,767
U.S. Government agencies	51,005		101		(490		)	50,616		47,355		72		(820		)	46,607
Corporate bonds	24,500		260		(512		)	24,248		23,491		323		(501		)	23,313
Total	$	145,578	$	453	$	(3,159	)	$	142,872	$	140,720	$	737	$	(2,799	)	$	138,658

December 31, 2017
Amortized
Cost Gross
Unrealized
Gains Gross
Unrealized
Losses Fair Value
(In thousands)
Mortgage-backed investments:
   Fannie Mae $ 26,961
$ 69
$ (466 ) $ 26,564
   Freddie Mac 5,510
18
(56 ) 5,472
   Ginnie Mae 22,288
14
(726 ) 21,576
Municipal bonds 13,126
290
(21 ) 13,395
U.S. Government agencies 43,088
81
(536 ) 42,633
Corporate bonds 22,502
527
(427 ) 22,602
Total $ 133,475
$ 999
$ (2,232 ) $ 132,242

~~FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~



	December 31, 2018
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
	(In thousands)
Mortgage-backed investments:
Fannie Mae	$	24,276	$	24	$	(657	)	$	23,643
Freddie Mac	6,351		10		(74		)	6,287
Ginnie Mae	23,311		—		(1,250		)	22,061
Other	8,983		17		(21		)	8,979
Municipal bonds	10,615		49		(120		)	10,544
U.S. Government agencies	48,190		73		(825		)	47,438
Corporate bonds	23,490		399		(671		)	23,218
Total	$	145,216	$	572	$	(3,618	)	$	142,170

The tables below summarize the aggregate fair value and gross unrealized loss by length of time those investment securities have been continuously in an unrealized loss position at the dates indicated:


	March 31, 2018															March 31, 2019
	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or Longer					Total					Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or Longer					Total
	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Loss
	(In thousands)															(In thousands)
Mortgage-backed investments:
Fannie Mae	$	20,250	$	(340	)	$	6,597	$	(523	)	$	26,847	$	(863	)	$	—	$	—		$	15,338	$	(370	)	$	15,338	$	(370	)
Freddie Mac	5,142		(103		)	—		—			5,142		(103		)	—		—			3,203		(18		)	3,203		(18		)
Ginnie Mae	6,233		(205		)	13,870		(889		)	20,103		(1,094		)	—		—			19,135		(1,050		)	19,135		(1,050		)
Other																6,008		(19		)	—		—			6,008		(19		)
Municipal bonds	6,015		(97		)	—		—			6,015		(97		)	—		—			987		(21		)	987		(21		)
U.S. Government agencies	34,681		(377		)	1,713		(113		)	36,394		(490		)	9,661		(114		)	30,381		(706		)	40,042		(820		)
Corporate bonds	1,500		—			6,987		(512		)	8,487		(512		)	—		—			6,999		(501		)	6,999		(501		)
Total	$	73,821	$	(1,122	)	$	29,167	$	(2,037	)	$	102,988	$	(3,159	)	$	15,669	$	(133	)	$	76,043	$	(2,666	)	$	91,712	$	(2,799	)

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


	December 31, 2017															December 31, 2018
	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or Longer					Total					Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or Longer					Total
	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Loss
	(In thousands)															(In thousands)
Mortgage-backed investments:
Fannie Mae	$	15,202	$	(91	)	$	6,759	$	(375	)	$	21,961	$	(466	)	$	5,480	$	(32	)	$	16,721	$	(625	)	$	22,201	$	(657	)
Freddie Mac	3,189		(56		)	—		—			3,189		(56		)	1,994		(23		)	3,185		(51		)	5,179		(74		)
Ginnie Mae	6,454		(61		)	14,234		(665		)	20,688		(726		)	2,867		(8		)	19,194		(1,242		)	22,061		(1,250		)
Other																6,008		(21		)	—		—			6,008		(21		)
Municipal bonds	1,403		(21		)	—		—			1,403		(21		)	4,161		(46		)	934		(74		)	5,095		(120		)
U.S. Government agencies	33,268		(435		)	1,800		(101		)	35,068		(536		)	5,985		(13		)	30,779		(812		)	36,764		(825		)
Corporate bonds	1,499		(1		)	7,074		(426		)	8,573		(427		)	—		—			6,828		(671		)	6,828		(671		)
Total	$	61,015	$	(665	)	$	29,867	$	(1,567	)	$	90,882	$	(2,232	)	$	26,495	$	(143	)	$	77,641	$	(3,475	)	$	104,136	$	(3,618	)

On a quarterly basis, management makes an assessment to determine whether there have been any events or economic circumstances to indicate that a security on which there is an unrealized loss is impaired on an other-than-temporary basis. The Company considers many factors including the severity and duration of the impairment, recent events specific to the issuer or industry, and for debt securities, external credit ratings and recent downgrades. Securities on which there is an unrealized loss that is deemed to be an other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) are written down to fair value. If the Company intends to sell a debt security, or it is likely that the Company will be required to sell the debt security before recovering its cost basis, the entire impairment loss would be recognized in earnings as an OTTI. If the Company does not intend to sell the debt security and it is not likely that it will be required to sell the debt security but does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the debt security, only the portion of the impairment loss representing credit losses would be recognized in earnings. The credit loss on a debt security is measured as the difference between the amortized cost basis and the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected. Projected cash flows are discounted by the original or current effective interest rate depending on the nature of the debt security being measured for potential OTTI. The remaining impairment related to all other factors, the difference between the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected and fair value, is recognized as a charge to other comprehensive income (“OCI”). Impairment losses related to all other factors are presented as separate categories within OCI. At March 31, ~~2018~~2019, and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, the Company had 4937 securities and 3651 securities in an unrealized loss position, respectively, with 1331 of these securities in an unrealized loss position for 12 months or more at both dates. Management does not believe that any individual unrealized loss as of March 31, 2019, or December 31, 2018, represented OTTI. The decline in fair market value of these securities was generally due to changes in interest rates and changes in market-desired spreads subsequent to their purchase. Management also reviewed the financial condition of the entities issuing municipal or corporate bonds at March 31, ~~2018~~2019, and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, and determined that an OTTI charge was not warranted.

~~FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investments available-for-sale at March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Investments not due at a single maturity date, primarily mortgage-backed investments, are shown separately.


	March 31, 2018				March 31, 2019
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
Due within one year	$	4,491	$	4,491	$	251	$	250
Due after one year through five years	2,197		2,189		7,328		7,481
Due after five years through ten years	24,447		24,151		19,291		19,000
Due after ten years	57,460		57,078		51,595		50,956
	88,595		87,909		78,465		77,687
Mortgage-backed investments	56,983		54,963		62,255		60,971
Total	$	145,578	$	142,872	$	140,720	$	138,658

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Under Washington state law, in order to participate in the public funds program the Company is required to pledge eligible securities as collateral in an amount equal to 50% of the public deposits held less the FDIC insured amount. Investment securities with market values of ~~$13.8~~$15.7 million and ~~$14.2~~$15.6 million were pledged as collateral for public deposits at March 31, ~~2018~~2019, and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, respectively, both of which exceeded the collateral requirements established by the Washington Public Deposit Protection Commission.

For the three months ended March 31, 2019, we had calls and sales on investment securities of $3.0 million, generating a net loss of $8,000. For the three months ended March 31, 2018, we had a maturity ofon one investment security of $2.0 million generating no gain or loss. For the three months ended March 31, 2017, we had calls on investment securities of $26,000, generating no gain or loss. There were no sales of available-for-sale investment securities during either period.

~~FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

Note 5 - Loans Receivable

Loans receivable are summarized as follows at the dates indicated:


	March 31, 2018		December 31, 2017		March 31, 2019		December 31, 2018
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
One-to-four family residential:
Permanent owner occupied	$	162,544	$	148,304	$	194,648	$	194,141
Permanent non-owner occupied	133,351		130,351		156,684		147,825
	295,895		278,655		351,332		341,966

Multifamily	190,392		184,902		167,843		169,355

Commercial real estate	366,774		361,842		384,686		373,819

Construction/land:
One-to-four family residential	97,779		87,404		84,191		86,604
Multifamily	85,773		108,439		87,748		83,642
Commercial	5,735		5,325		22,400		18,300
Land	13,299		36,405		6,965		6,740
	202,586		237,573		201,304		195,286

Business	24,237		23,087		33,513		30,486
Consumer	11,131		9,133		14,336		12,970
Total loans	1,091,015		1,095,192		1,153,014		1,123,882

Less:
Loans in process ("LIP")(1)	85,576		92,498		86,794		86,453
Deferred loan fees, net	1,165		1,150		701		1,178
Allowance for loan and lease losses ("ALLL")	13,136		12,882		13,808		13,347
Loans receivable, net	$	991,138	$	988,662	$	1,051,711	$	1,022,904

^{_______________}

⁽¹⁾ LIP is the amount of committed but undisbursed funds on construction loans.

At March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, loans totaling ~~$469.7~~$480.7 million were pledged to secure borrowings from the FHLB of Des Moines compared to ~~$422.6~~$471.4 million at December 31, ~~2017.~~2018.

~~ALLL~~Credit Quality Indicators. The Company ~~maintains an ALLL as~~assigns a ~~reserve against probable~~risk rating to all credit exposures based on a risk rating system designed to define the basic characteristics and ~~inherent~~identified risk elements of ~~losses in its loan portfolios.~~each credit extension. The ~~ALLL is comprised of~~Company utilizes a general reserve component for loans evaluated collectively for loss and a specific reserve component for loans evaluated individually. When an issue is identified and it is determined that the loan needs to be classified as nonperforming and/or impaired, an evaluationnine‑point risk rating system. A description of the ~~discounted expected cash flows is done and an appraisal may be obtained on the collateral. Based on this evaluation, additional provision for loan loss or charge-offs is recorded prior to the end~~general characteristics of the ~~financial reporting period.~~risk grades is as follows:

1513

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Grades 1 through 5: These grades are considered to be “pass” credits. These include assets where there is virtually no credit risk, such as cash secured loans with funds on deposit with the Bank. Pass credits also include credits that are on the Company’s watch list, where the borrower exhibits potential weaknesses, which may, if not checked or corrected, negatively affect the borrower’s financial capacity and threaten their ability to fulfill debt obligations in the future.

Grade 6: These credits, classified as “special mention”, possess weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. Special mention assets do not expose the Company to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification in the substandard, doubtful or loss categories. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration in the Company’s credit position at a future date.

Grade 7: These credits, classified as “substandard”, present a distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. These credits have well defined weaknesses which jeopardize the orderly liquidation of the debt and are inadequately protected by the current net worth and payment capacity of the borrower or of any collateral pledged.

Grade 8: These credits are classified as “doubtful” and possess well defined weaknesses which make the full collection or liquidation of the loan highly questionable and improbable. This classification is used where significant risk exposures are perceived but the exact amount of the loss cannot yet be determined due to pending events.

Grade 9: Assets classified as “loss” are considered uncollectible and cannot be justified as a viable asset for the Company. There is little or no prospect of near term recovery and no realistic strengthening action of significance is pending.

As of March 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018, the Company had no loans rated as doubtful or loss. The following tables represent a summary of loans at March 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018 by type and risk category:



	March 31, 2019
	One-to-Four Family Residential		Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate		Construction/ Land		Business		Consumer		Total ⁽¹⁾
	(In thousands)
Risk Rating:
Pass	$	349,894	$	167,843	$	384,149	$	112,380	$	33,513	$	14,292	$	1,062,071
Special mention	795		—		537		2,130		—		—		3,462
Substandard	643		—		—		—		—		44		687
Total loans	$	351,332	$	167,843	$	384,686	$	114,510	$	33,513	$	14,336	$	1,066,220

_______________

⁽¹⁾ Net of LIP.



	December 31, 2018
	One-to-Four Family Residential		Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate		Construction/ Land		Business		Consumer		Total ⁽¹⁾
	(In thousands)
Risk Rating:
Pass	$	339,310	$	169,355	$	372,690	$	108,854	$	30,486	$	12,926	$	1,033,621
Special mention	1,737		—		782		—		—		—		2,519
Substandard	919		—		326		—		—		44		1,289
Total loans	$	341,966	$	169,355	$	373,798	$	108,854	$	30,486	$	12,970	$	1,037,429

_______________

⁽¹⁾ Net of LIP.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

ALLL. When the Company classifies problem assets as either substandard or doubtful, pursuant to Federal regulations, it may establish a specific reserve in an amount deemed prudent to address the risk specifically or may allow the loss to be addressed in the general allowance. General allowances represent loss allowances which have been established to recognize the inherent risk associated with lending activities, but which, unlike specific allowances, have not been specifically allocated to the particular problem assets. When an insured institution classifies problem assets as a loss, pursuant to Federal regulations, it is required to charge-off such assets in the period in which they are deemed uncollectible. The determination as to the classification of the Company’s assets and the amount of valuation allowances is subject to review by bank regulators, who can require the establishment of additional loss allowances.

Loan grades are used by the Company to identify and track potential problem loans which do not rise to the levels described for substandard, doubtful, or loss. The grades for watch and special mention are assigned to loans which have been criticized based upon known characteristics such as periodic payment delinquency or stale financial information from the borrower and/or guarantors. Loans identified as criticized (watch and special mention) or classified (substandard, doubtful or loss) are subject to problem loan reporting every three months.

The following tables summarize changes in the ALLL and loan portfolio by loan type and impairment method at the dates and for the periods shown:


	At or For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2018																	At or For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
	One-to-Four Family Residential			Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate		Construction/ Land			Business		Consumer		Total			One-to-Four Family Residential			Multifamily			Commercial Real Estate		Construction/ Land		Business		Consumer			Total
	(In thousands)																	(In thousands)
ALLL:
Beginning balance	$	2,837		$	1,820	$	4,418	$	2,816		$	694	$	297	$	12,882		$	3,387		$	1,680		$	4,777	$	2,331	$	936	$	236		$	13,347
Charge-offs	—			—		—		—			—		—		—			—			—			—		—		—		—			—
Recoveries	4,240			—		14		—			—		—		4,254			24			—			—		—		—		37			61
(Recapture) provision	(3,840		)	64		58		(362		)	46		34		(4,000		)	(379		)	(101		)	32		801		94		(47		)	400
Ending balance	$	3,237		$	1,884	$	4,490	$	2,454		$	740	$	331	$	13,136		$	3,032		$	1,579		$	4,809	$	3,132	$	1,030	$	226		$	13,808

ALLL by category:
General reserve	$	3,168		$	1,884	$	4,464	$	2,454		$	740	$	331	$	13,041		$	2,982		$	1,579		$	4,809	$	3,132	$	1,030	$	226		$	13,758
Specific reserve	69			—		26		—			—		—		95			50			—			—		—		—		—			50

Loans: ⁽¹⁾
Total loans	$	295,895		$	190,392	$	366,231	$	117,554		$	24,237	$	11,131	$	1,005,440		$	351,332		$	167,843		$	384,686	$	114,510	$	33,513	$	14,336		$	1,066,220
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment ⁽²⁾	283,866			189,264		363,059		117,554			24,237		11,038		989,018			345,569			167,843			382,530		114,510		33,513		14,292			1,058,257
Loans individually evaluated for impairment ⁽³⁾	12,029			1,128		3,172		—			—		93		16,422			5,763			—			2,156		—		—		44			7,963

____________

⁽¹⁾Net of LIP.

⁽²⁾Loans collectively evaluated for general reserves.

⁽³⁾Loans individually evaluated for specific reserves.

1615

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


	At or For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017																	At or For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
	One-to-Four Family Residential			Multifamily			Commercial Real Estate		Construction/ Land			Business		Consumer		Total		One-to-Four Family Residential			Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate		Construction/ Land			Business		Consumer		Total
	(In thousands)																	(In thousands)
ALLL:
Beginning balance	$	2,551		$	1,199		$	3,893	$	2,792		$	237	$	279	$	10,951	$	2,837		$	1,820	$	4,418	$	2,816		$	694	$	297	$	12,882
Charge-offs	—			—			—		—			—		—		—		—			—		—		—			—		—		—
Recoveries	7			—			—		—			—		—		7		4,240			—		14		—			—		—		4,254
(Recapture) provision	(16		)	(11		)	134		(1		)	74		20		200		(3,840		)	64		58		(362		)	46		34		(4,000		)
Ending balance	$	2,542		$	1,188		$	4,027	$	2,791		$	311	$	299	$	11,158	$	3,237		$	1,884	$	4,490	$	2,454		$	740	$	331	$	13,136

ALLL by category:
General reserve	$	2,357		$	1,188		$	4,003	$	2,791		$	311	$	299	$	10,949	$	3,168		$	1,884	$	4,464	$	2,454		$	740	$	331	$	13,041
Specific reserve	185			—			24		—			—		—		209		69			—		26		—			—		—		95

Loans: ⁽¹⁾
Total loans	$	249,219		$	121,718		$	317,719	$	145,200		$	10,370	$	7,878	$	852,104	$	295,895		$	190,392	$	366,231	$	117,554		$	24,237	$	11,131	$	1,005,440
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment ⁽²⁾	226,884			120,566			314,036		145,200			10,370		7,778		824,834		283,866			189,264		363,059		117,554			24,237		11,038		989,018
Loans individually evaluated for impairment ⁽³⁾	22,335			1,152			3,683		—			—		100		27,270		12,029			1,128		3,172		—			—		93		16,422

_____________

⁽¹⁾ Net of LIP.

⁽²⁾ Loans collectively evaluated for general reserves.

⁽³⁾ Loans individually evaluated for specific reserves.

1716

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Past Due Loans. Loans are considered past due if a scheduled principal or interest payment is due and unpaid for 30 days or more. At March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, past due loans were ~~0.02%~~0.03% of total loans receivable, net of LIP. In comparison, past due loans were ~~0.01%~~0.08% of total loans receivable, net of LIP at December 31, ~~2017.~~2018. The following tables represent a summary of the aging of loans by type at the dates indicated:


	Loans Past Due as of March 31, 2018												Loans Past Due as of March 31, 2019
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		90 Days and Greater		Total Past Due		Current		Total ^{(1) (2)}		30-59 Days		60-89 Days		90 Days and Greater		Total Past Due		Current		Total ^{(1) (2)}
	(In thousands)												(In thousands)
Real estate:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	$	—	$	101	$	124	$	225	$	162,319	$	162,544	$	107	$	—	$	—	$	107	$	194,541	$	194,648
Non-owner occupied	—		—		—		—		133,351		133,351		166		—		—		166		156,518		156,684
Multifamily	—		—		—		—		190,392		190,392		—		—		—		—		167,843		167,843
Commercial real estate	—		—		—		—		366,231		366,231		—		—		—		—		384,686		384,686
Construction/land	—		—		—		—		117,554		117,554		—		—		—		—		114,510		114,510
Total real estate	—		101		124		225		969,847		970,072		273		—		—		273		1,018,098		1,018,371
Business	—		—		—		—		24,237		24,237		—		—		—		—		33,513		33,513
Consumer	—		—		—		—		11,131		11,131		44		—		—		44		14,292		14,336
Total loans	$	—	$	101	$	124	$	225	$	1,005,215	$	1,005,440	$	317	$	—	$	—	$	317	$	1,065,903	$	1,066,220

________________

⁽¹⁾ There were no loans 90 days and greater past due and still accruing interest at March 31, ~~2018~~2019.

⁽²⁾ Net of LIP.


	Loans Past Due as of December 31, 2017												Loans Past Due as of December 31, 2018
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		90 Days and Greater		Total Past Due		Current		Total ^{(1) (2)}		30-59 Days		60-89 Days		90 Days and Greater		Total Past Due		Current		Total ^{(1) (2)}
	(In thousands)												(In thousands)
Real estate:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	$	101	$	—	$	—	$	101	$	148,203	$	148,304	$	223	$	—	$	272	$	495	$	193,646	$	194,141
Non-owner occupied	—		—		—		—		130,351		130,351		—		—		—		—		147,825		147,825
Multifamily	—		—		—		—		184,902		184,902		—		—		—		—		169,355		169,355
Commercial real estate	—		—		—		—		361,299		361,299		—		—		326		326		373,472		373,798
Construction/land	—		—		—		—		145,618		145,618		—		—		—		—		108,854		108,854
Total real estate	101		—		—		101		970,373		970,474		223		—		598		821		993,152		993,973
Business	—		—		—		—		23,087		23,087		—		—		—		—		30,486		30,486
Consumer	—		—		—		—		9,133		9,133		—		—		—		—		12,970		12,970
Total loans	$	101	$	—	$	—	$	101	$	1,002,593	$	1,002,694	$	223	$	—	$	598	$	821	$	1,036,608	$	1,037,429

_________________

⁽¹⁾ There were no loans 90 days and greater past due and still accruing interest at December 31, ~~2017.~~2018.

⁽²⁾ Net of LIP.

1817

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Nonaccrual Loans. The following table is a summary of nonaccrual loans by loan type at the dates indicated:


	March 31, 2018		December 31, 2017		March 31, 2019		December 31, 2018
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
One-to-four family residential	$	125	$	128	$	107	$	382
Commercial real estate					—		326
Consumer	50		51		44		44
Total nonaccrual loans	$	175	$	179	$	151	$	752

During the three months ended March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, interest income that would have been recognized had these nonaccrual loans been performing in accordance with their original terms was $6,000. For the three months ended March 31, ~~2017,~~2018, foregone interest on nonaccrual loans was ~~$9,000.~~$6,000.

The following tables summarize the loan portfolio by type and payment status at the dates indicated:


	March 31, 2018														March 31, 2019
	One-to-Four Family Residential		Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate		Construction/ Land		Business		Consumer		Total ⁽¹⁾		One-to-Four Family Residential		Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate		Construction/ Land		Business		Consumer		Total ⁽¹⁾
	(In thousands)														(In thousands)
Performing ⁽²⁾	$	295,770	$	190,392	$	366,231	$	117,554	$	24,237	$	11,081	$	1,005,265	$	351,225	$	167,843	$	384,686	$	114,510	$	33,513	$	14,292	$	1,066,069
Nonperforming ⁽³⁾	125		—		—		—		—		50		175		107		—		—		—		—		44		151
Total loans	$	295,895	$	190,392	$	366,231	$	117,554	$	24,237	$	11,131	$	1,005,440	$	351,332	$	167,843	$	384,686	$	114,510	$	33,513	$	14,336	$	1,066,220

_____________


⁽¹⁾	Net of LIP.


⁽²⁾	There were ~~$162.4~~$194.5 million of owner-occupied one-to-four family residential loans and ~~$133.4~~$156.7 million of non-owner occupied one-to-four family residential loans classified as performing.


⁽³⁾	The ~~$125,000 of~~$107,000 one-to-four family residential ~~loans~~loan classified as nonperforming ~~are all~~is owner-occupied.


	December 31, 2017														December 31, 2018
	One-to-Four Family Residential		Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate		Construction/ Land		Business		Consumer		Total⁽¹⁾		One-to-Four Family Residential		Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate		Construction/ Land		Business		Consumer		Total⁽¹⁾
	(In thousands)														(In thousands)
Performing ⁽²⁾	$	278,527	$	184,902	$	361,299	$	145,618	$	23,087	$	9,082	$	1,002,515	$	341,584	$	169,355	$	373,472	$	108,854	$	30,486	$	12,926	$	1,036,677
Nonperforming ⁽³⁾	128		—		—		—		—		51		179		382		—		326		—		—		44		752
Total loans	$	278,655	$	184,902	$	361,299	$	145,618	$	23,087	$	9,133	$	1,002,694	$	341,966	$	169,355	$	373,798	$	108,854	$	30,486	$	12,970	$	1,037,429

_____________

⁽¹⁾Net of LIP.

⁽²⁾There were ~~$148.2~~$193.8 million of owner-occupied one-to-four family residential loans and ~~$130.3~~$147.8 million of non-owner occupied one-to-four family residential loans classified as performing.

⁽³⁾The ~~$128,000~~$382,000 of one-to-four family residential loans classified as nonperforming are all owner-occupied.

Impaired Loans. A loan is considered impaired when we have determined that we may be unable to collect payments of principal or interest when due under the terms of the original loan document. There were no funds committed to be advanced in connection with impaired loans at either March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, or December 31, ~~2017.~~2018.

1918

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following tables present a summary of loans individually evaluated for impairment by loan type at the dates indicated:


	March 31, 2018						March 31, 2019
	Recorded Investment ⁽¹⁾		Unpaid Principal Balance ⁽²⁾		Related Allowance		Recorded Investment ⁽¹⁾		Unpaid Principal Balance ⁽²⁾		Related Allowance
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Loans with no related allowance:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	$	1,306	$	1,502	$	—	$	847	$	1,030	$	—
Non-owner occupied	6,906		6,906		—		2,040		2,040		—
Multifamily	1,128		1,128		—
Commercial real estate	1,059		1,059		—		2,156		2,156		—
Consumer	93		143		—		44		72		—
Total	10,492		10,738		—		5,087		5,298		—

Loans with an allowance:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	520		566		3		511		558		18
Non-owner occupied	3,297		3,318		66		2,365		2,365		32
Commercial real estate	2,113		2,113		26
Total	5,930		5,997		95		2,876		2,923		50

Total impaired loans:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	1,826		2,068		3		1,358		1,588		18
Non-owner occupied	10,203		10,224		66		4,405		4,405		32
Multifamily	1,128		1,128		—
Commercial real estate	3,172		3,172		26		2,156		2,156		—
Consumer	93		143		—		44		72		—
Total	$	16,422	$	16,735	$	95	$	7,963	$	8,221	$	50

_________________

⁽¹⁾ Represents the loan balance less charge-offs.

⁽²⁾ Contractual loan principal balance.

2019

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


	December 31, 2017						December 31, 2018
	Recorded Investment ⁽¹⁾		Unpaid Principal Balance⁽²⁾		Related Allowance		Recorded Investment ⁽¹⁾		Unpaid Principal Balance⁽²⁾		Related Allowance
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Loans with no related allowance:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	$	1,321	$	1,516	$	—	$	1,308	$	1,477	$	—
Non-owner occupied	8,409		8,409		—		2,375		2,375		—
Multifamily	1,134		1,134		—
Commercial real estate	1,065		1,065		—		2,499		2,499		—
Consumer	94		144		—		87		141		—
Total	12,023		12,268		—		6,269		6,492		—

Loans with an allowance:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	522		568		5		513		560		22
Non-owner occupied	3,310		3,332		111		3,126		3,148		37
Commercial real estate	2,129		2,129		19		241		241		3
Total	5,961		6,029		135		3,880		3,949		62

Total impaired loans:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	1,843		2,084		5		1,821		2,037		22
Non-owner occupied	11,719		11,741		111		5,501		5,523		37
Multifamily	1,134		1,134		—
Commercial real estate	3,194		3,194		19		2,740		2,740		3
Consumer	94		144		—		87		141		—
Total	$	17,984	$	18,297	$	135	$	10,149	$	10,441	$	62

_________________

⁽¹⁾ Represents the loan balance less charge-offs.

⁽²⁾ Contractual loan principal balance.

2120

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following table presents the average recorded investment in loans individually evaluated for impairment and the interest income recognized for the three months ended March 31, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017:~~2018:


	Three Months Ended March 31, 2018				Three Months Ended March 31, 2017				Three Months Ended March 31, 2019				Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
	Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
	(In thousands)								(In thousands)
Loans with no related allowance:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	$	1,314	$	25	$	2,114	$	31	$	1,078	$	15	$	1,314	$	25
Non-owner occupied	7,658		127		15,495		211		2,208		31		7,658		127
Multifamily	1,131		18		1,358		19		—		—		1,131		18
Commercial real estate	1,062		19		2,942		53		2,328		38		1,062		19
Consumer	94		2		102		2		66		1		94		2
Total	11,259		191		22,011		316		5,680		85		11,259		191

Loans with an allowance:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	521		9		1,892		26		512		9		521		9
Non-owner occupied	3,304		47		4,203		55		2,746		30		3,304		47
Commercial real estate	2,121		34		753		10		121		—		2,121		34
Construction/land	—		—		248		—
Total	5,946		90		7,096		91		3,379		39		5,946		90

Total impaired loans:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	1,835		34		4,006		57		1,590		24		1,835		34
Non-owner occupied	10,962		174		19,698		266		4,954		61		10,962		174
Multifamily	1,131		18		1,358		19		—		—		1,131		18
Commercial real estate	3,183		53		3,695		63		2,449		38		3,183		53
Construction/land	—		—		248		—
Consumer	94		2		102		2		66		1		94		2
Total	$	17,205	$	281	$	29,107	$	407	$	9,059	$	124	$	17,205	$	281

Troubled Debt Restructurings. Certain loan modifications are accounted for as troubled debt restructured loans (“TDRs”). At March 31, 2019, the TDR portfolio totaled $7.8 million. At December 31, 2018, the TDR portfolio totaled ~~$16.2 million. At December 31, 2017, the TDR portfolio totaled $17.8~~$9.4 million. At both dates, all TDRs were performing according to their modified repayment terms.

~~There were no loans modified as TDRs for the three months ended March 31, 2018 or 2017.~~ At March 31, ~~2018~~2019, the Company had no commitments to extend additional credit to borrowers whose loan terms have been modified in TDRs. All TDRs are also classified as impaired loans and are included in the loans individually evaluated for impairment as part of the calculation of the ALLL. No loans accounted for as TDRs were charged-off to the ALLL for the three months ended March 31, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017.~~2018.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following table presents TDR modifications for the periods indicated and their recorded investment prior to and after the modification:



	Three Months Ended March 31, 2019			Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
	Number of Loans	Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment	Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment	Number of Loans	Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment	Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
	(Dollars in thousands)
One-to-four family residential
Principal and interest with interest rate concession and advancement of maturity date	6	824	824	—	—	—
Advancement of maturity date	3	694	694	—	—	—
Total	9	1,518	1,518	—	—	—

TDRs that default after they have been modified are typically evaluated individually on a collateral basis. Any additional impairment is charged to the ALLL. For the three months ended March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, and March 31, ~~2017,~~2018, no loans that had been modified in the previous 12 months defaulted.

~~FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

~~Credit Quality Indicators~~. The Company utilizes a nine-category risk rating system and assigns a risk rating for all credit exposures. The risk rating system is designed to define the basic characteristics and identify risk elements of each credit extension. Credits risk rated 1 through 5 are considered to be “pass” credits. Pass credits include assets, such as cash secured loans with funds on deposit with the Bank, where there is virtually no credit risk. Pass credits also include credits that are on the Company’s watch list, where the borrower exhibits potential weaknesses, which may, if not checked or corrected, negatively affect the borrower’s financial capacity and threaten their ability to fulfill debt obligations in the future. Credits classified as special mention are risk rated 6 and possess weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. Special mention assets do not expose the Company to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification in the substandard, doubtful or loss categories. Substandard credits are risk rated 7~~. An asset is considered substandard if it is inadequately protected by the current net worth and payment capacity of the borrower or of any collateral pledged.~~

Substandard assets include those characterized by the distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Assets classified as doubtful are risk rated 8 and have all the weaknesses inherent in those credits classified as substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses present make collection or liquidation in full highly questionable and improbable, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values. Assets classified as loss are risk rated 9 and are considered uncollectible and cannot be justified as a viable asset for the Company. There were no loans classified as doubtful or loss at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

~~The following tables represent a summary of loans by type and risk category at the dates indicated:~~

March 31, 2018
One-to-Four
Family
Residential Multifamily Commercial
Real Estate Construction/
Land Business Consumer
Total ⁽¹⁾
(In thousands)
Risk Rating:
   Pass $ 292,894
$ 190,392
$ 363,237
$ 117,554
$ 24,237
$ 10,893
$ 999,207
   Special mention 2,333
—
2,441
—
—
188
4,962
   Substandard 668
—
553
—
—
50
1,271
Total loans $ 295,895
$ 190,392
$ 366,231
$ 117,554
$ 24,237
$ 11,131
$ 1,005,440

~~_____________~~

⁽¹⁾ ~~Net of LIP.~~

December 31, 2017

One-to-Four
Family
Residential
Multifamily
Commercial
Real Estate

Construction/
Land
Business Consumer
Total ⁽¹⁾
(In thousands)
Risk Rating:
   Pass $ 275,653
$ 184,902
$ 358,285
$ 145,618
$ 23,087
$ 8,893
$ 996,438
   Special mention 2,329
—
2,459
—
—
188
4,976
   Substandard 673
—
555
—
—
52
1,280
Total loans $ 278,655
$ 184,902
$ 361,299
$ 145,618
$ 23,087
$ 9,133
$ 1,002,694

~~_____________~~

⁽¹⁾ ~~Net of LIP.~~

Note 6 - Other Real Estate Owned

OREO includes properties acquired by the Company through foreclosure and deed in lieu of foreclosure. The following table is a summary of OREO activity during the periods shown:

~~FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~


	Three Months Ended March 31,					Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018		2017			2019			2018
	(In thousands)					(In thousands)
Balance at beginning of period	$	483	$	2,331		$	483		$	483
Market value adjustments	—		(50		)	(29		)	—
Balance at end of period	$	483	$	2,281		$	454		$	483

For the three months ended March 31, 2019, there were no OREO properties sold. Based on current appraisals, there were $29,000 in market value adjustments taken on the properties in OREO. For the three months ended March 31, 2018, there were no ~~OREO properties sold and no~~sales or market value adjustments ~~taken~~ on ~~the remaining properties in OREO. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, a $50,000 market value adjustment was recognized prior to the sale of the one~~our OREO ~~property sold during a subsequent period.~~properties. OREO at March 31, ~~2018~~2019, consisted of ~~$483,000~~$454,000 in commercial real estate properties. At March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, there were no loans ~~secured by residential real estate properties~~ for which formal foreclosure proceedings were in process.

Note 7 - Fair Value

The fair value of financial instruments presented in this note, with the exception of loans receivable, are based on the same methodology as presented in Note 7 of the Company’s 2017 10-K. The Company has adopted ASU 2016-01, and therefore is measuring the fair value of loans receivable under the exit price notion rather than the previous method of entry price notion. Under the entry price notion, the fair value estimate of loans receivable was based on discounted cash flow. At March 31, 2018, the exit price notion used to estimate the fair value of loans receivable was based on similar techniques, with the addition of current origination spreads, liquidity premiums, or credit adjustments. The fair value of nonperforming loans is based on the underlying value of the collateral for periods prior to and after adoption of ASU 2016-01.

The Company determines the fair values of its financial instruments based on the fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair values. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect its estimate for market assumptions.

Valuation inputs refer to the assumptions market participants would use in pricing a given asset or liability using one of the three valuation techniques. Inputs can be observable or unobservable. Observable inputs are those assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the particular asset or liability. These inputs are based on market data and are obtained from an independent source. Unobservable inputs are assumptions based on the Company’s own information or estimate of assumptions used by market participants in pricing the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs are based on the best and most current information available on the measurement date.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

All inputs, whether observable or unobservable, are ranked in accordance with a prescribed fair value hierarchy:

Level 1 - Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

Level 2 - Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable.

Level 3 - Instruments whose significant value drivers are unobservable.

The ~~tables below present~~Company used the ~~balances of assets measured at~~following methods to measure fair value on a recurring ~~basis (there were no transfers between Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 recurring measurements) at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017:~~

~~FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2018
Fair Value Measurements Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
(In thousands)
Investments available-for-sale:
Mortgage-backed investments:
Fannie Mae $ 28,695
$ —
$ 28,695
$ —
Freddie Mac 5,369
—
5,369
—
Ginnie Mae 20,899
—
20,899
—
Municipal bonds 13,045
—
13,045
—
U.S. Government agencies 50,616
—
50,616
—
Corporate bonds 24,248
—
24,248
—
Total available-for-sale
investments 142,872
—
142,872
—
Derivative fair value asset 2,189
—
2,189
—
Total $ 145,061
$ —
$ 145,061
$ —

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2017
Fair Value Measurements Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
(In thousands)
Investments available-for-sale:
Mortgage-backed investments:
Fannie Mae $ 26,564
$ —
$ 26,564
$ —
Freddie Mac 5,472
—
5,472
—
Ginnie Mae 21,576
—
21,576
—
Municipal bonds 13,395
—
13,395
—
U.S. Government agencies 42,633
—
42,633
—
Corporate bonds 22,602
—
22,602
—
Total available-for-sale
investments 132,242
—
132,242
—
Derivative fair value asset 1,526
—
1,526
—
Total $ 133,768
$ —
$ 133,768
$ —

~~The estimated fair value of Level 2 investments is based on quoted prices for similar investments in active markets, identical~~ or ~~similar investments in markets that are not active and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable.~~

~~The tables below present the balances of assets measured at fair value on a~~ nonrecurring ~~basis at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017:~~

~~FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2018
Fair Value
Measurements Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1) Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2) Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
(In thousands)
Impaired loans (included in loans
receivable, net) ⁽¹⁾
$ 16,327
$ —
$ —
$ 16,327
OREO 483
—
—
483
Total $ 16,810
$ —
$ —
$ 16,810

~~_____________~~


⁽¹⁾	~~Total fair value of impaired loans is net of $95,000 of specific reserves on performing TDRs.~~

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2017
Fair Value
Measurements Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1) Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2) Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
(In thousands)
Impaired loans (included in loans
receivable, net) ⁽¹⁾
$ 17,849
$ —
$ —
$ 17,849
OREO 483
—
—
483
Total $ 18,332
$ —
$ —
$ 18,332

~~_____________~~

⁽¹⁾ ~~Total fair value of impaired loans is net of $135,000 of specific reserves on performing TDRs.~~

The fair value of impaired loans reflects the exit price and is calculated using the collateral value method or on a discounted cash flow basis. Inputs used in the collateral value method include appraised values, less estimated costs to sell. Some of these inputs may not be observable in the marketplace. ~~Appraised values may be discounted based on management’s knowledge of the marketplace, subsequent changes in market conditions, or management’s knowledge of the borrower.~~

OREO properties are measured at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value, less estimated costs to sell. Fair values are generally based on third party appraisals of the property, resulting in a Level 3 classification. In cases where the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, less estimated costs to sell, an impairment loss is recognized.

The following tables present quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements for financial instruments measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017:

March 31, 2018
Fair Value Valuation Technique Unobservable Input(s) Range (Weighted Average)
(Dollars in thousands)
Impaired Loans $ 16,327
Market approach Appraised value discounted by market or borrower conditions 0.0%
(0.0%)

OREO $ 483
Market approach Appraised value less selling costs 0.0%
(0.0%)

~~FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

December 31, 2017
Fair Value Valuation Technique Unobservable Input(s) Range (Weighted Average)
(Dollars in thousands)
Impaired Loans $ 17,849
Market approach Appraised value discounted by market or borrower conditions 0.0%
(0.0%)

OREO $ 483
Market approach Appraised value less selling costs 0.0%
(0.0%)

~~The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments were as follows at the dates indicated:~~

March 31, 2018
Estimated Fair Value Measurements Using:
Carrying Value Fair Value Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
(In thousands)
Financial Assets:
Cash on hand and in banks $ 6,595
$ 6,595
$ 6,595
$ —
$ —
Interest-earning deposits with banks 13,954
13,954
13,954
—
—
Investments available-for-sale 142,872
142,872
—
142,872
—
Loans receivable, net 991,138
982,143
—
—
982,143
FHLB stock 9,450
9,450
—
9,450
—
Accrued interest receivable 3,981
3,981
—
3,981
—
Derivative fair value asset 2,189
2,189
—
2,189
—

Financial Liabilities:

Deposits 449,835
449,835
449,835
—
—
Certificates of deposit, retail 337,906
334,254
—
334,254
—
Certificates of deposit, brokered 75,488
75,043
—
75,043
—
Advances from the FHLB 200,000
196,921
—
196,921
—
Accrued interest payable 270
270
—
270
—

~~FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

December 31, 2017
Estimated Fair Value Measurements Using:
Carrying Value Fair Value Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
(In thousands)
Financial Assets:
Cash on hand and in banks $ 9,189
$ 9,189
$ 9,189
$ —
$ —
Interest-earning deposits with banks 6,942
6,942
6,942
—
—
Investments available-for-sale 132,242
132,242
—
132,242
—
Loans receivable, net 988,662
980,578
—
—
980,578
FHLB stock 9,882
9,882
—
9,882
—
Accrued interest receivable 4,084
4,084
—
4,084
—
Derivative fair value asset 1,526
1,526
—
1,526
—

Financial Liabilities:

Deposits 430,750
430,750
430,750
—
—
Certificates of deposit, retail 333,264
331,199
—
331,199
—
Certificates of deposit, brokered 75,488
74,947
—
74,947
—
Advances from the FHLB 216,000
214,477
—
214,477
—
Accrued interest payable 326
326
—
326
—

~~Fair value estimates are measured at the exit price notion. The methods and calculation assumptions are set forth below for the Company’s financial instruments:~~basis:

Financial instruments with book value equal to fair value: The fair value of financial instruments that are short-term or reprice frequently and that have little or no risk are considered to have a fair value equal to book value. These instruments include cash on hand and in banks, interest-earning deposits with banks, FHLB stock, accrued interest receivable and accrued interest payable. FHLB stock is not publicly-traded, however it may be redeemed on a dollar-for-dollar basis, for any amount the Bank is not required to hold, subject to the FHLB’s discretion. The fair value is therefore equal to the book value.

Investments available-for-sale: The fair value of all investments, excluding FHLB stock, was based upon quoted market prices for similar investments in active markets, identical or similar investments in markets that are not active and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable.

Loans receivable: ~~Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-01, loan fair value estimates were primarily calculated using discounted cash flows. With the adoption of ASU 2016-01, the~~The fair value of loans receivable ~~at March 31, 2018 were~~are based on the exit price notion, and are calculated from inputs reflective of current market pricing for similar instruments, to include current origination spreads, liquidity premiums, and credit adjustments. The fair value of nonperforming loans is estimated using the fair value of the underlying collateral.

Derivatives: The fair value of derivatives is based on dealer quotes, pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques for which the determination of fair value may require significant management judgment or estimation.

Liabilities: The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as statement savings, interest-bearing checking and money market accounts, is equal to the amount payable on demand. The fair value of certificates of deposit is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows using current interest rates for certificates of deposit with similar remaining maturities. The fair value of FHLB advances is estimated based on discounting the future cash flows using current interest rates for debt with similar remaining maturities.

Off balance sheet commitments: No fair value adjustment is necessary for commitments made to extend credit, which represents commitments for loan originations or for outstanding commitments to purchase loans. These commitments

~~FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

are at variable rates, are for loans with terms of less than one year and have interest rates which approximate prevailing market rates, or are set at the time of loan closing.

Fair value estimates are based on existing balance sheet financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business. The fair value has not been estimated for assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The tables below present the balances of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis (there were no transfers between Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 recurring measurements) at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018:



	Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2019
	Fair Value Measurements		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)
Investments available-for-sale:
Mortgage-backed investments:
Fannie Mae	$	23,686	$	—	$	23,686	$	—
Freddie Mac	6,319		—		6,319		—
Ginnie Mae	22,013		—		22,013		—
Other	8,953		—		8,953		—
Municipal bonds	7,767		—		7,767		—
U.S. Government agencies	46,607		—		46,607		—
Corporate bonds	23,313		—		23,313		—
Total available-for-sale investments	138,658		—		138,658		—
Derivative fair value asset	1,203		—		1,203		—
Total	$	139,861	$	—	$	139,861	$	—



	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2018
	Fair Value Measurements		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)
Investments available-for-sale:
Mortgage-backed investments:
Fannie Mae	$	23,643	$	—	$	23,643	$	—
Freddie Mac	6,287		—		6,287		—
Ginnie Mae	22,061		—		22,061		—
Other	8,979		—		8,979		—
Municipal bonds	10,544		—		10,544		—
U.S. Government agencies	47,438		—		47,438		—
Corporate bonds	23,218		—		23,218		—
Total available-for-sale investments	142,170		—		142,170		—
Derivative fair value asset	1,662		—		1,662		—
Total	$	143,832	$	—	$	143,832	$	—

The estimated fair value of Level 2 investments is based on quoted prices for similar investments in active markets, identical or similar investments in markets that are not active and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The tables below present the balances of assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at March 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018:



	Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2019
	Fair Value Measurements		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)
Impaired loans (included in loans receivable, net) ⁽¹⁾	$	7,913	$	—	$	—	$	7,913
OREO	454		—		—		454
Total	$	8,367	$	—	$	—	$	8,367

_____________


⁽¹⁾	Total fair value of impaired loans is net of $50,000 of specific reserves on performing TDRs.



	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2018
	Fair Value Measurements		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)
Impaired loans (included in loans receivable, net) ⁽¹⁾	$	10,087	$	—	$	—	$	10,087
OREO	483		—		—		483
Total	$	10,570	$	—	$	—	$	10,570

_____________

⁽¹⁾ Total fair value of impaired loans is net of $62,000 of specific reserves on performing TDRs.

The fair value of impaired loans reflects the exit price and is calculated using the collateral value method or on a discounted cash flow basis. Inputs used in the collateral value method include appraised values, less estimated costs to sell. Some of these inputs may not be observable in the marketplace. Appraised values may be discounted based on management’s knowledge of the marketplace, subsequent changes in market conditions, or management’s knowledge of the borrower.



	March 31, 2019
	Fair Value		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Input(s)	Range (Weighted Average)
	(Dollars in thousands)
Impaired Loans	$	7,913	Market approach	Appraised value discounted by market or borrower conditions	0.0% (0.00%)

OREO	$	454	Market approach	Appraised value less selling costs	0.0% - 6.31% (6.03%)

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)



	December 31, 2018
	Fair Value		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Input(s)	Range (Weighted Average)
	(Dollars in thousands)
Impaired Loans	$	10,087	Market approach	Appraised value discounted by market or borrower conditions	0.0% (0.0%)

OREO	$	483	Market approach	Appraised value less selling costs	0.0% (0.0%)

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments were as follows at the dates indicated:



	March 31, 2019
			Estimated		Fair Value Measurements Using:
	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	(In thousands)
Financial Assets:
Cash on hand and in banks	$	9,366	$	9,366	$	9,366	$	—	$	—
Interest-earning deposits with banks	14,596		14,596		14,596		—		—
Investments available-for-sale	138,658		138,658		—		138,658		—
Loans receivable, net	1,051,711		1,041,639		—		—		1,041,639
FHLB stock	8,041		8,041		—		8,041		—
Accrued interest receivable	4,861		4,861		—		4,861		—
Derivative fair value asset	1,203		1,203		—		1,203		—

Financial Liabilities:
Deposits	432,949		432,949		432,949		—		—
Certificates of deposit, retail	398,956		400,539		—		400,539		—
Certificates of deposit, brokered	123,367		123,417		—		123,417		—
Advances from the FHLB	163,500		163,689		—		163,689		—
Accrued interest payable	478		478		—		478		—

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)



	December 31, 2018
			Estimated		Fair Value Measurements Using:
	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	(In thousands)
Financial Assets:
Cash on hand and in banks	$	8,122	$	8,122	$	8,122	$	—	$	—
Interest-earning deposits with banks	8,888		8,888		8,888		—		—
Investments available-for-sale	142,170		142,170		—		142,170		—
Loans receivable, net	1,022,904		1,012,114		—		—		1,012,114
FHLB stock	7,310		7,310		—		7,310		—
Accrued interest receivable	4,068		4,068		—		4,068		—
Derivative fair value asset	1,662		1,662		—		1,662		—

Financial Liabilities:
Deposits	450,033		450,033		450,033		—		—
Certificates of deposit, retail	391,174		390,101		—		390,101		—
Certificates of deposit, brokered	97,825		97,466		—		97,466		—
Advances from the FHLB	146,500		146,357		—		146,357		—
Accrued interest payable	478		478		—		478		—

Note 8 - Leases

The Company adopted ASU 2016-02 and ASU 2018-11 using the modified retrospective approach with an effective date of January 1, 2019, and recognized on the consolidated balance sheets a right-of-use asset (“ROU”) included in prepaid expenses and other assets and lease liabilities included in other liabilities. As such, prior year financial statements were not restated under the new standard. At March 31, 2019, the Company had ten operating leases for retail branch locations. The remaining lease terms range from 1.4 to 6.3 years, with most leases carrying optional extensions of 3-5 years. The Company will include optional lease term extensions in the ROU assets and lease liabilities when management believes it is reasonably certain that the term extension will be exercised, and will be determined based on indicators that the Company would have an economic incentive to extend the lease. The Company has elected to not apply ASU 2016-02 to short term leases, which are those that have a term of one year or less. To calculate the present value of lease payments not yet paid, the Company uses the incremental borrowing rate, which is equal to the FHLB advance rate for the term of the lease that was in place at each lease inception.

The minimum monthly lease payments are generally based on square footage of the leased premises, with escalating minimum rent over the lease term. At March 31, 2019, the Company was committed to paying $51,000 per month in minimum monthly lease payments. The minimum monthly lease payment over the initial lease term, including any free rent period, was used to calculate the ROU and lease liability. The Company’s current leases do not include any non-lease components.

Total lease expense included in the Company’s Consolidated Income Statement for the three months ended March 31, 2019, was $175,000. This included the amortized lease expense under ASU 2016-02 combined with variable lease expenses for maintenance or other expenses as defined in the individual lease agreements. The right-of-use asset and lease liability both had a balance of $1.7 million on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2019, and are amortizing over a weighted-average remaining term of 4.2 years. The weighted-average discount rate used to calculate the present value of future minimum lease payments was 2.96% at March 31, 2019.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following table provides a reconciliation between the undiscounted minimum lease payments at March 31, 2019 and the discounted lease liability at that date:



	March 31, 2019
	(in thousands)
Due through one year	$	527
Due after one year through two years	471
Due after two years through three years	300
Due after three years through four years	277
Due after four years through five years	176
Due after five years	112
Total minimum lease payments	1,863
Less: present value discount	(118		)
Lease liability	$	1,745

The Company has secured a lease for a new retail branch in Kirkland, Washington. The initial lease term is for 65 months and includes options to extend the lease. The minimum rent will be determined at commencement and will increase annually thereafter. This lease was not included in the calculation of discounted lease payments at March 31, 2019.

Note 9 - Derivatives

The Company uses a derivative financial instrument, which qualifies as a cash flow hedge, to manage the risk of changes in future cash flows due to interest rate fluctuations. The hedged instrument is a $50.0 million three-month FHLB advance that will be renewed every three months at the fixed interest rate at that time. The agreement has a five-year term and stipulates that the counterparty will pay the Company interest at three-month LIBOR and the Company will pay fixed interest of 1.34% on the $50.0 million notional amount. The Company pays or receives the net interest amount quarterly and includes this amount as part of interest expense on the Consolidated Income Statement.

Quarterly, the effectiveness evaluation is based upon the fluctuation of the interest the Company pays to the FHLB for the hedge instrument as compared to the three-month LIBOR interest received from the counterparty. At March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, the fair value of the cash flow hedge of ~~$2.2~~$1.2 million was reported with other assets. The tax effected amount of ~~$524,000~~$950,000 was included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. There were no amounts recorded in the Consolidated Income Statements for the quarters ended March 31, ~~2018~~2019 or ~~2017~~2018, related to ineffectiveness.

Fair value for this derivative instrument, which generally changes as a result of changes in the level of market interest rates, is estimated based on dealer quotes and secondary market sources.

The following table presents the fair value of this derivative instrument as of March 31, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017:~~2018:


	Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value at March 31, 2018		Fair Value at December 31, 2017		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value at March 31, 2019		Fair Value at December 31, 2018
	(In thousands)					(In thousands)
Interest rate swap on FHLB debt designated as cash flow hedge	Other Assets	$	2,189	$	1,526	Other Assets	$	1,203	$	1,662

Total derivatives		$	2,189	$	1,526		$	1,203	$	1,662

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following table presents the effect of this derivative instrument on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the quarters ended March 31, ~~2018~~2019, and December 31, ~~2017:~~2018:

Balance Sheet Location Amount Recognized in OCI at March 31, 2018 Amount Recognized in OCI at December 31, 2017
(In thousands)
Interest rate swap on FHLB debt
designated as cash flow hedge Other assets $ 524
$ 125



	Balance Sheet Location	Amount Recognized in OCI at March 31, 2019			Amount Recognized in OCI at December 31, 2018
	(In thousands)
Interest rate swap on FHLB debt designated as cash flow hedge	Other assets	$	(363	)	$	108

Note 910 - Stock-Based Compensation

In June 2016, First Financial Northwest’s shareholders approved the First Financial Northwest, Inc. 2016 Equity Incentive Plan (“2016 Plan”). This plan provides for the granting of incentive stock options (“ISO”), non-qualified stock options (“NQSO”), restricted stock and restricted stock units until June 2026. The 2016 Plan established 1,400,000 shares available to grant with a maximum of 400,000 of these shares available to grant as restricted stock awards. Each share issued as a restricted stock award counts as two shares towards the total shares available to award.

~~FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

Under the 2016 Plan, the vesting date for each option award or restricted stock award is determined by an award committee and specified in the award agreement. In the case of restricted stock awards granted in lieu of cash payments of directors’ fees, the grant date is used as the vesting date unless the award agreement provides otherwise.

As a result of the approval of the 2016 Plan, the First Financial Northwest, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (“2008 Plan”) was frozen and no additional awards will be made. At March 31, ~~2018, the remaining 5,000~~2019, there were no unvested shares of ~~unvested~~ restricted stock awards under the 2008 ~~Plan are expected to vest in 2018. In addition, 84,000~~Plan. At this date, there were 35,000 stock options granted under the 2008 Plan that are expected to vest and be available for exercise, and an additional ~~358,940~~280,000 stock options from the 2008 Plan were available for exercise at March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, subject to the 2008 Plan provisions. At March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, there were ~~1,309,054~~1,207,274 total shares available for grant under the 2016 Plan, including ~~354,527~~328,637 shares available to be granted as restricted stock.

For the three months ended March 31, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, total compensation expense for both the 2008 and 2016 Plans was ~~$84,000~~$124,000 and ~~$110,000,~~$84,000, respectively, and the related income tax benefit was ~~$18,000~~$26,000 and ~~$39,000,~~$18,000, respectively.

Stock Options

Under the 2008 Plan, stock option awards were granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of First Financial Northwest’s common stock at the grant date. These option awards have a vesting period of ~~five~~5 years, with 20% vesting on the anniversary date of each grant date, and a contractual life of 10 years. Any unexercised stock options ~~expires~~expire ten years after the grant date, or sooner in the event of the award recipient’s death, disability or termination of service with the Company and the Bank.

Under the 2016 Plan, the exercise price and vesting period for stock options are determined by the award committee and specified in the award agreement, however, the exercise price shall not be less than the fair market value of a share as of the grant date. Any unexercised stock option will expire 10 years after the award date or sooner in the event of the award recipient’s death, disability, retirement, or termination of service.

The fair value of each option award is estimated on the grant date using a Black-Scholes model that uses the following assumptions. The dividend yield is based on the current quarterly dividend in effect at the time of the grant. Historical employment data is used to estimate the forfeiture rate. The historical volatility of the Company’s stock price over a specified period of time is used for the expected volatility assumption. First Financial Northwest bases the risk-free interest rate on the U.S. Treasury Constant Maturity Indices in effect on the date of the grant. First Financial Northwest elected to use the “Share-Based Payments” method permitted by the SEC to calculate the expected term. This method uses the vesting term of an option along with the contractual term, setting the expected life at the midpoint.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Under certain conditions, a cashless exercise of vested stock options may occur by the option holder surrendering the number of options valued at the current stock price at the time of exercise to cover the total cost to exercise. The surrendered options are canceled and are unavailable for reissue.

~~FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

A summary of the Company’s stock option plan awards and activity for the three months ended March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, follows:

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
Shares Weighted-Average Exercise Price Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term in Years Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2018 452,940
$ 10.21

$ 2,402,096
Exercised (10,000 ) 9.78

Outstanding at March 31, 2018 442,940
10.22
4.33 2,894,042
Vested and expected to vest assuming a 3% forfeiture
rate over the vesting term 440,420
10.21
4.31 2,880,637
Exercisable at March 31, 2018 358,940
9.93
3.82 2,447,222



	For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
	Shares	Weighted-Average Exercise Price		Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term in Years	Aggregate Intrinsic Value		Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2019	315,000	$	10.34		$	1,615,600	$	3.69
Granted	50,000	15.80					5.03
Outstanding at March 31, 2019	365,000	11.09		5.43	1,703,800		3.88
Vested and expected to vest assuming a 3% forfeiture rate over the vesting term	362,450	11.07		5.41	1,699,668		3.87
Exercisable at March 31, 2019	280,000	10.16		4.59	1,566,070		3.61

As of March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, there was ~~$232,000~~$323,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock options granted under the 2008 ~~Plan.~~and 2016 Plans. The cost is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted-average vesting period of ~~1.76~~3.84 years. There were no50,000 stock options granted under the 2016 Plan during the three months ended March 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

Restricted Stock Awards

The 2008 Plan authorized the grant of restricted stock awards to directors, advisory directors, officers and employees. Compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period of the awards based on the fair value of the stock at the grant date. The restricted stock awards’ fair value is equal to the stock price on the grant date. Shares awarded under this plan as restricted stock vest ratably over a ~~five-year period beginning at the grant date with 20% vesting on the anniversary date of each grant date.~~

The 2016 Plan authorizes the grant of restricted stock awards subject to vesting periods or terms as defined by the award committee and specified in the award agreement. Restricted stock awards granted in lieu of cash payments for directors’ fees are subject to immediate vesting on the grant date unless the award agreement provides otherwise.

A summary of changes in nonvested restricted stock awards for the three months ended March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, follows:


	For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2018			For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
	Shares	Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value		Shares		Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Nonvested at January 1, 2018	5,000	$	10.88
Nonvested at January 1, 2019				20,987		$	15.90
Granted	20,987	15.90		16,698		16.53
Nonvested at March 31, 2018	25,987	14.93
Vested				(20,987	)	15.90
Nonvested at March 31, 2019				16,698		16.53
Expected to vest assuming a 3% forfeiture rate over the vesting term	25,207	14.93		16,197		16.53

As of March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, there was ~~$316,000~~$247,000 of total unrecognized compensation costs related to nonvested shares granted as restricted stock awards. The cost is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted-average vesting period of ~~0.90 years.~~eleven months.

Note 1011 - Earnings Per Share

Per the provisions of FASB ASC 260, Earnings Per Share, nonvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities and are included in the computation of EPS pursuant to the two-class method. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for each class of common stock and participating security according to dividends declared (or accumulated) and participation rights in undistributed earnings. ESOP shares are considered outstanding for basic and diluted earnings per share when the shares are committed to be released. Certain of the Company’s nonvested restricted stock awards qualify as participating securities.

~~FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

Net income is allocated between the common stock and participating securities pursuant to the two-class method, based on their rights to receive dividends, participate in earnings, or absorb losses. Basic earnings per common shares is computed by

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

dividing net earnings available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, excluding participating nonvested restricted shares.

The following table presents a reconciliation of the components used to compute basic and diluted earnings per share for the periods indicated:


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018			2017			2019			2018
	(Dollars in thousands, except share data)						(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
Net income	$	6,842		$	2,344		$	1,945		$	6,842
Less: Earnings allocated to participating securities	(16		)	(5		)	(3		)	(16		)
Earnings allocated to common shareholders	$	6,826		$	2,339		$	1,942		$	6,826

Basic weighted average common shares outstanding	10,210,828			10,319,722			10,118,286			10,210,828
Dilutive stock options	122,465			171,028			89,718			122,465
Dilutive restricted stock grants	3,273			13,296			12,896			3,273
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding	10,336,566			10,504,046			10,220,900			10,336,566

Basic earnings per share	$	0.67		$	0.23		$	0.19		$	0.67
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.66		$	0.22		$	0.19		$	0.66

Potential dilutive shares are excluded from the computation of earnings per share if their effect is anti-dilutive. For the three months ended March 31, ~~2018 and 2017,~~2019, there were 50,000 options to purchase shares of common stock that were omitted from the computation of diluted earnings per share because their effect would be anti-dilutive. For the three months ended March 31, 2018, there no options to purchase shares of common stock that were omitted from the computation of diluted earnings per share because their effect would be anti-dilutive.

Note 1112 - Branch Acquisition

On August 25, 2017, First Financial Northwest Bank completed the acquisition of four branches from Opus Bank, a California state-chartered commercial ~~bank (“Branch Acquisition”).~~bank. The Branch Acquisition included four retail branches located in Woodinville, Clearview, Lake Stevens, and Smokey Point, Washington. The Bank acquired $74.7 million of retail deposits, prior to the fair value adjustment, one owned bank branch, three leased branches, and certain fixed assets at these branches. The purchase price of the Branch Acquisition paid by the Bank included a deposit premium of 3.125% of the average daily balance of acquired deposits for 20 days prior to the closing date, or $2.5 million; 80% of the fair market value of the owned branch, or $488,000; the net book value of fixed assets, or $56,000; and $14,000 for other pro rations and adjustments as of the closing date. Opus Bank paid the Bank $71.6 million in cash for the difference between these amounts and the total deposits assumed.

The Branch Acquisition was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting, and accordingly, the assets received and liabilities assumed were recorded at their fair market value as of August 25, 2017. The application of the acquisition method of accounting resulted in recognition of a core deposit intangible asset (“CDI”) of $1.3 million and goodwill of $889,000. The acquired CDI has been determined to have a useful life of approximately ten years and is amortized on an accelerated basis. Goodwill is not amortized but will be evaluated for impairment on an annual basis, or more often if circumstances dictate, to determine if the carrying value remains appropriate.

The ~~operating results~~balance of the ~~Company include the operating results produced by the acquired liabilities~~CDI and ~~additional branch locations. For illustrative purposes, the following table provides certain unaudited pro forma information for the three months ended~~goodwill at March 31, 2017, with the information calculated as if the four Opus branches had been acquired as of January 1, 2017, the beginning of the year prior to the date of acquisition. The pro forma information is an estimate of the additional interest expense, noninterest income2019 was $1.1 million and ~~noninterest expense that might have been incurred during this period. The unaudited pro forma~~

~~FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

statement does not include interest income earned on the investment of the acquired funds into either loans receivable or available-for-sale investment securities. Actual results would have differed from the unaudited pro forma information presented.

Unaudited Pro Forma
Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
(In thousands except share data)
Total revenues (net interest income plus noninterest income) $ 9,293
Net income 1,970
Earnings per share - basic 0.19
Earnings per share - diluted 0.19

~~The Company recognized acquisition related expenses of $4,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2018, and no acquisition related expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2017.~~

The following table includes noninterest expenses for the four acquired branches for the three months ended March 31, 2018. These expenses are included in the Consolidated Income Statements in Item 1 of this report:

Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
(In thousands)
Salaries and employee benefits $ 286
Occupancy and equipment 81
Marketing 5
Other general and administrative 23
Total noninterest expense $ 395
$889,000, respectively.

Note 1213 - Revenue Recognition

In accordance with Topic 606, revenues are recognized when goods or services are transferred to the customer in exchange for the consideration the Company expects to be entitled to receive. To determine the appropriate recognition of revenue for

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

transactions within the scope of Topic 606, the Company performs the following five steps: (i) identify the contract(s) with the customer; (ii) identify the separate performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv) allocate the transaction price to the separate performance obligations in the contract; and (v) recognize revenue when the entity satisfies a performance obligation. A contract may not exist if there are doubts as to collectability of the amounts the Company is entitled to in exchange for the goods or services transferred. If a contract is determined to be within the scope of Topic 606, the Company recognizes revenue as it satisfies a performance obligation. The largest portion of the Company’s revenue is from net interest income which is not inwithin the scope of Topic 606.

Disaggregation of Revenue

The following table includes the Company’s noninterest income disaggregated by type of service for the three months ended March 31, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017:~~

~~FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

2018:


	Three Months Ended				Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2018		March 31, 2017		March 31, 2019			March 31, 2018
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
Loss on sale of investments ⁽¹⁾					$	(8	)	$	—
BOLI change in cash surrender value ⁽¹⁾	249		201		269			249
Wealth management revenue	99		140		196			99
Deposit related fees	63		42		69			63
Debit card and ATM fees	98		29		102			98
Loan related fees	87		35		47			87
Loan interest swap fees	47		85		16			47
Other	3		3		9			3
Total noninterest income	$	646	$	535	$	700		$	646

_______________

⁽¹⁾ Not inwithin scope of Topic 606

For the three months ended March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, substantially all of the Company’s revenues under the scope of Topic 606 are for performance obligations satisfied at a specified date.

Revenues recognized inwithin scope of Topic 606

Wealth management revenue: Our wealth management revenue consists of commissions received on the investment portfolio managed by Bank personnel but held by a third party. Commissions are earned on brokerage services and advisory services based on contract terms at the onset of a new customer’s investment agreement or quarterly for ongoing services. Commissions are paid by the third party to the Bank when the performance obligation has been completed by both entities.

Deposit related fees: Fees are earned on our deposit accounts for various products or services performed for our customers. Fees include business account fees, non-sufficient fund fees, stop payment fees, wire services, safe deposit box, and others. These fees are recognized on a daily or monthly basis, depending on the type of service.

Debit card and ATM fees: Fees are earned when a debit card issued by the Bank is used or when other bank’s customers use our ATM services. Revenue is recognized at the time the fees are collected from the customer’s account or remitted by the VISA interchange network.

Loan related fees: Noninterest fee income is earned on our loans for servicing or annual fees on certain loan types.

Loan interest swap fees: For loans participating in an interest rate swap agreement, fees are earned at the onset of the agreement and are not contingent on any future performance or term length of the loan itself. The performance obligation is satisfied by entering into the contract and receipt of the fees from the counterparty.

Other: Fees earned on other services, such as merchant services or occasional non-recurring type services, are recognized at the time of the event or the applicable billing cycle.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Contract Balances

At March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, the Company had no contract liabilities where the Company had an obligation to transfer goods or services for which the Company had already received consideration. In addition, the Company had no material performance obligations as of this date.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain matters discussed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements relate to our financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance or business. Forward-looking statements are not statements of historical fact, are based on certain assumptions and are generally identified by use of the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “forecasts,”

~~“intends,~~ “intends,” “plans,” “targets,” “potentially,” “probably,” “projects,” “outlook” or similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “would” and “could.” Forward-looking statements include statements with respect to our beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, assumptions and statements about, among other things, expectations of the business environment in which we operate, projections of future performance or financial items, perceived opportunities in the market, potential future credit experience, and statements regarding our mission and vision. These forward-looking statements are based upon current management expectations and may, therefore, involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results, performance, or achievements may differ materially from those suggested, expressed, or implied by forward-looking statements as a result of a wide variety or range of factors including, but not limited to: the credit risks of lending activities, including changes in the level and trend of loan delinquencies and write-offs, that may be affected by deterioration in the housing and commercial real estate markets, and may lead to increased losses and nonperforming assets in our loan portfolio, and may result in our allowance for loan losses not being adequate to cover actual losses, and require us to materially increase our reserves; changes in general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market areas; changes in the levels of general interest rates, and the relative differences between short and long term interest rates, deposit interest rates, our net interest margin and funding sources; fluctuations in the demand for loans, the number of unsold homes and other properties and fluctuations in real estate values in our market areas; results of examinations of us by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and our bank subsidiary by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), the Washington State Department of Financial Institutions, Division of Banks (“DFI”) or other regulatory authorities, including the possibility that any such regulatory authority may initiate an enforcement action against the Company or the Bank which could require us to increase our reserve for loan losses, write-down assets, change our regulatory capital position, affect our ability to borrow funds or maintain or increase deposits, or impose additional requirements or restrictions on us, any of which could adversely affect our liquidity and earnings; our ability to pay dividends on our common stock; our ability to attract and retain deposits; increases in premiums for deposit insurance; our ability to control operating costs and expenses; the use of estimates in determining the fair value of certain of our assets, which estimates may prove to be incorrect and result in significant declines in valuation; difficulties in reducing risk associated with the loans on our balance sheet; staffing fluctuations in response to product demand or the implementation of corporate strategies that affect our work force and potential associated charges; disruptions, security breaches, or other adverse events, failures or interruptions in, or attacks on, our information technology systems or on the third-party vendors who perform several of our critical processing functions; our ability to retain key members of our senior management team; costs and effects of litigation, including settlements and judgments; our ability to implement our branch expansion strategy; our ability to successfully integrate any assets, liabilities, customers, systems, and management personnel we have acquired or may in the future acquire into our operations and our ability to realize related revenue synergies and cost savings within expected time frames and any goodwill charges related thereto; our ability to manage loan delinquency rates; costs and effects of litigation, including settlements and judgments; increased competitive pressures among financial services companies; changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits; legislative or regulatory changes that adversely affect our business including changes in regulatory policies and principles, including the interpretation of regulatory capital or other rules, including as a result of Basel III; the impact of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the ~~“Dodd Frank~~“Dodd-Frank Act”) and the implementing regulations; the availability of resources to address changes in laws, rules, or regulations or to respond to regulatory actions; adverse changes in the securities markets; inability of key third-party providers to perform their obligations to us; changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the financial institution regulatory agencies or the Financial Accounting Standards Board, including additional guidance and interpretation on accounting

issues and details of the implementation of new accounting methods; the economic impact of war or any terrorist activities; other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory, and technological factors affecting our operations; pricing, products and services; and other risks detailed in our filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2017~~2018 (“~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K”). Any of the forward-looking statements that we make in this Form 10-Q and in the other public reports and statements we make may turn out to be wrong because of the inaccurate assumptions we might make, because of the factors illustrated above or because of other factors that we cannot foresee. Because of these and other uncertainties, our actual future results may be materially different from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by or on our behalf. Therefore, these factors should be considered in evaluating the forward-looking statements, and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. We undertake no responsibility to update or revise any forward-looking statements.

Overview

First Financial Northwest Bank (“the Bank”) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of First Financial Northwest, Inc. (“the Company”) and, as such, comprises substantially all of the activity for the Company. First Financial Northwest Bank was a community-based savings bank until February 4, 2016, when the Bank converted to a Washington chartered commercial bank reflecting the commercial banking services it now provides to its customers. The Bank primarily serves King, Pierce, Snohomish, and Kitsap counties, Washington, through its full-service banking office and headquarters in Renton, Washington, as well as ~~three~~five retail branches in King County, Washington and five retail branches in Snohomish County, Washington. ~~On August 25, 2017, the~~The Bank completed the purchase of four retail branches in Woodinville in King County, and Lake Stevens, Clearview, and Smokey Point communities in Snohomish County and acquired $74.7 million in deposits. The Branch Acquisition expanded our retail

~~footprint and provided an opportunity~~has received FDIC approval to ~~extend our unique brand of community banking into those communities. In addition, in April 2018, the Bank opened~~open a new branch ~~office at The Junction, a new, mixed use development~~ in ~~Bothell,~~Kirkland, Washington. This additional King County location is expected to open in later in 2019.

The Bank’s business consists predominantly of attracting deposits from the general public, combined with borrowing from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines (“FHLB”) and raising funds in the wholesale market, then utilizing these funds to originate one-to-four family residential, multifamily, commercial real estate, construction/land, business, and consumer loans. ~~Our~~With the current ~~business strategy emphasizes commercial real estate, construction, one-to-four family residential, and multifamily lending. Recently, improvements~~low interest rate environment, we are not aggressively pursuing longer term assets, but rather are focused on financing shorter term loans, in the economy, employment rates, stronger real estate prices, and a general lack of new housing inventory in certain areas in the Puget Sound region have resulted in our significantly increasing originations of construction loans for properties located in our market area.particular construction/land loans. We anticipate that construction/land lending will continue to be a strong element of our total loan portfolio in future periods. We will continue to take a disciplined approach in our construction/land lending by concentrating our efforts on residential loans to builders known to us, including multifamily loans to developers with proven success in this type of construction. These ~~short term~~ loans typically mature in six to eighteen ~~months. In addition, the~~months and funding is usually not fully disbursed at origination, ~~thereby reducing our~~therefore the impact to net loans receivable is generally minimal in the short term. We have also geographically expanded our loan portfolio through loan purchases or loan participations of commercial and multifamily real estate loans that are outside of our primary market area. Through our efforts to geographically diversify our loan portfolio with direct loan originations, loan participations, or loan purchases, our portfolio includes loans in 2327 other states, including concentrations in California, Utah, Arizona and Oregon ~~and Arizona~~ of ~~$44.8~~$41.4 million, ~~$17.6~~$16.1 million, $14.6 million and ~~$14.8~~$11.8 million, respectively.

In support of our strategic growth plan, the Bank has developed a national line of business to originate and service aircraft loans. These loans are collateralized by new or used, single-engine piston aircraft to light jets for business or personal use which have demonstrated an acceptable valuation history under industry accepted valuation resources. ~~These~~The underwriting of these loans ~~will generally range in size from $250,000 to $8.0 million with underwriting guidelines~~is primarily based on the asset value of the collateral with secondary emphasis placed on the ability of the borrower to repay the loan. We began originating aircraft loans in the fourth quarter of 2016. At March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, our business loans included ~~$10.5~~$11.9 million in fixed and adjustable rate aircraft loans.

Our primary source of revenue is interest income, which is the income that we earn on our loans and investments. Interest expense is the interest that we pay on our deposits and borrowings. Net interest income is the difference between interest income and interest expense. Changes in levels of interest rates affect interest income and interest expense differently and, thus, impacts our net interest income. First Financial Northwest Bank is generally liability-sensitive, meaning our interest-bearing liabilities reprice at a faster rate than our interest-earning assets.

An offset to net interest income is the provision for loan losses which is required to establish the allowance for loan and lease losses (“ALLL”) at a level that adequately provides for probable losses inherent in our loan portfolio. As our loan portfolio increases, or due to an increase for probable losses inherent in our loan portfolio, our ALLL may increase, resulting in a decrease to net interest income. Improvements in loan risk ratings, increases in property values, or receipt of recoveries of amounts previously charged off may partially or fully offset any increase to ALLL due to loan growth or an increase in probable loan losses.

Noninterest income is generated from various loan or deposit fees, increases in the cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”), and revenue earned on our wealth management brokerage services. This income is increased or partially offset by any net gain or loss on sales of investment securities.

Our noninterest expenses consist primarily of salaries and employee benefits, professional fees, regulatory assessments, occupancy and equipment, and other general and administrative expenses. Salaries and employee benefits consist primarily of the salaries and wages paid to our employees, payroll taxes, expenses for retirement, and other employee benefits. OREO-related expenses consist primarily of maintenance and costs of utilities for the OREO inventory, market valuation adjustments, build-out expenses, gains and losses from OREO sales, legal fees, real estate taxes, and insurance related to the properties included in the OREO inventory. Professional fees include legal services, auditing and accounting services, computer support services, and other professional services in support of strategic plans. Occupancy and equipment expenses, which are the fixed and variable costs of buildings and equipment, consist primarily of real estate taxes, depreciation expenses, maintenance, and costs of utilities. Also included in noninterest expense ~~are changes~~is the change to the Company’s unfunded commitment reserve which ~~are~~is reflected in general and administrative expenses. This unfunded commitment reserve expense can vary significantly each quarter, based on the amount believed by management to be sufficient to absorb estimated probable losses related to unfunded credit facilities, and reflects changes in the amounts that the Company has committed to fund but has not yet disbursed.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our significant accounting policies are fundamental to understanding our results of operations and financial condition because they require that we use estimates and assumptions that may affect the value of our assets or liabilities and our financial results. These policies are critical because they require management to make difficult, subjective, and complex judgments about

matters that are inherently uncertain and because it is likely that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or by using different assumptions. These policies govern the ALLL, the valuation of OREO, and the calculation of deferred taxes, the right-of-use asset and lease liability on our operating leases, fair values, and other-than-temporary impairments on the market value of investments and derivatives. These policies and estimates are described in further detail in Part II, Item 7 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies ~~with~~in the ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K. There have not been any material changes in the Company’s critical accounting policies and estimates as compared to the disclosure contained in the ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K.

Comparison of Financial Condition at March 31, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017~~2018

Total assets were ~~$1.23~~$1.29 billion at March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, an increase of ~~1.3%~~2.8%, from ~~$1.21~~$1.25 billion at December 31, ~~2017.~~2018. The following table details the ~~$16.1~~$35.4 million net change in the composition of our assets at March 31, ~~2018~~2019 from December 31, ~~2017.~~2018.


	Balance at March 31, 2018		Change from December 31, 2017			Percent Change		Balance at March 31, 2019		Change from December 31, 2018			Percent Change
	(Dollars in thousands)							(Dollars in thousands)
Cash on hand and in banks	$	6,595	$	(2,594	)	(28.2	)%	$	9,366	$	1,244		15.3	%
Interest-earning deposits with banks	13,954		7,012			101.0		14,596		5,708			64.2
Investments available-for-sale, at fair value	142,872		10,630			8.0		138,658		(3,512		)	(2.5	)
Loans receivable, net	991,138		2,476			0.3		1,051,711		28,807			2.8
FHLB stock, at cost	9,450		(432		)	(4.4	)	8,041		731			10.0
Accrued interest receivable	3,981		(103		)	(2.5	)	4,861		793			19.5
Deferred tax assets, net	1,362		151			12.5		1,728		(116		)	(6.3	)
OREO	483		—			—		454		(29		)	(6.0	)
Premises and equipment, net	21,208		594			2.9		21,370		39			0.2
BOLI, net	29,276		249			0.9		30,162		321			1.1
Prepaid expenses and other assets	3,922		(1,816		)	(31.6	)	4,947		1,489			43.1
Goodwill	889		—			—		889		—			—
Core deposit intangible	1,228		(38		)	(3.0	)	1,079		(37		)	(3.3	)
Total assets	$	1,226,358	$	16,129		1.3	%	$	1,287,862	$	35,438		2.8	%

Interest-earning deposits with banks. Our interest-earning deposits with banks, consisting primarily of funds held at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (“FRB”), increased by ~~$7.0~~$5.7 million from December 31, ~~2017~~2018, to March 31, ~~2018. Our balance of these~~2019. These funds ~~increased~~fluctuate based on our funding needs. Growth in our customer deposits late in the ~~first quarter of 2018 as a result of loan payoffs outpacing new originations, as well as~~three months ended March 31, 2019 resulted in an increase ~~in customer deposits.~~to our cash held at the FRB.

Investments available-for-sale. Our investments available-for-sale portfolio ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$10.6~~$3.5 million during the first three months of 2018. During this period, we purchased $16.1 million of securities which included one mortgage-backed security, one corporate bond, two asset-backed securities, and three U.S. government agency bonds. These purchases were made to complete the restructuring of our available-for-sale investment securities that began in December 2017, as well as to invest excess cash earning a nominal yield into higher-yielding assets. The purchases included certain longer-term securities as well as Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”) qualified investments. During the three months ended March 31, ~~2018,~~2019. During this period, we ~~did not sell any~~sold $3.0 million of ~~our securities, however~~municipal bonds and had a ~~$2.0 million corporate bond paid off at maturity.~~$30,000 call on a U.S. government agency bond. At March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, corporate bonds issued by financial institutions represented ~~$24.2~~$23.3 million, or ~~17.0%~~16.8% of our investments available-for-sale and municipal bonds represented ~~$13.0~~$7.8 million, or ~~9.1%~~5.6% of our investments available-for-sale.

The effective duration of the investments available-for-sale at March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, was ~~3.3%~~2.78% as compared to ~~2.9%~~3.00% at December 31, ~~2017, partially due to the longer-term securities purchased during the quarter.~~2018. Effective duration is a measure that attempts to quantify the anticipated percentage change in the value of

an investment security (or portfolio) in the event of a 100 basis point change in market yields. Since the Bank’s portfolio includes securities with embedded options (including call options on bonds and prepayment options on mortgage-backed securities), management believes that effective duration is an appropriate metric to use as a tool when analyzing the Bank’s investment securities portfolio, as effective duration incorporates assumptions relating to such embedded options, including changes in cash flow assumptions as interest rates change.

Loans receivable. Net loans receivable ~~of $991.1~~increased by $28.8 million to $1.05 billion at March 31, ~~2018 increased $2.5 million~~2019, as compared to December 31, ~~2017.~~2018. Loan originations of ~~$70.4~~$67.8 million ~~included $29.6~~were supplemented with $17.6 million of ~~one-to-four family residential loans, resulting in a net increase of $17.2 million in~~loan purchases, discussed below, to offset loan repayments and continue to grow our ~~one-to-four family~~ loan portfolio. ~~We are focused on growing~~During the three months ended March 31, 2019, our one‑to‑four family portfolio ~~with specific emphasis on loans for investment properties~~increased by $9.4 million and ~~to foreign nationals. Both of these sectors have challenges obtaining secondary market eligible loans, making them a desirable niche for~~ our ~~portfolio. In addition, multifamily and~~ commercial real estate portfolio increased by $10.9 million. In addition, total construction/land loans increased by ~~$5.5~~$6.0 million, business loans increased by $3.0 million and ~~$4.9 million, respectively. The balance of our construction~~consumer loans increased by $1.4 million. Partially offsetting these increases, multifamily loans decreased by ~~$35.0~~$1.5 million ~~during the first three months of 2018, primarily due to a $20.0 million paydown in January 2018 of a construction/land loan.~~as pay downs and payoffs outpaced new loan originations for these loan types.

~~The growth in one-to-four family residential loans and decrease in construction/land loans have improved our commercial concentrations. At~~Our loan concentrations remained stable at March 31, ~~2018 and~~2019 as compared to December 31, ~~2017,~~2018. At these dates, the Bank’s construction loans totaled ~~84.9%~~87.5% and ~~108.6%, respectively,~~81.9% of total capital, respectively, and total non-owner occupied commercial real estate was ~~484.8%~~460.9% and ~~514.0%, respectively,~~451.8% of total ~~capital.~~capital, respectively. The Bank has set aggregate concentration guidelines that total commercial real estate, including residential, non‑residential, and construction, should not exceed 550% of total risk-based capital. Our concentration guideline for construction/land loans is to limit these loans to 100% of total risk-based capital. The concentration of construction/land loans is calculated using the funded balance of these loans and consequently can fluctuate based on the timing of construction draws and loan payoffs. Management reviews estimated construction draws and loan payoffs and adjusts loan originations based on these estimates to achieve compliance with our construction guidelines. Our commercial and multifamily real estate and construction/land loan portfolios are subject to ongoing credit reviews performed by both independent loan review staff, as well as an external third-party review firm to assist with identifying potential adverse trends and risks in the portfolio allowing management to initiate timely corrective action, as necessary. Such reviews also assist with ensuring loan risk grades are accurately assigned and thereby properly accounted for in the ALLL. The review places emphasis on large borrowing relationships, stress testing, compliance with loan covenants, as well as other risk factors warranting enhanced review.

The following table presents a breakdown of our commercial and construction loan portfolio by collateral type at March 31, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017:~~2018:


	March 31, 2018		December 31, 2017		March 31, 2019		December 31, 2018
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
Multifamily real estate:
Multifamily, general					$	153,835	$	155,279
Micro-unit apartments	$	14,266	$	14,331	14,008		14,076
Other multifamily	176,126		170,571
Total multifamily real estate	190,392		184,902		167,843		169,355

Commercial real estate:
Retail					146,864		131,222
Office	107,966		112,327		99,639		100,495
Retail	131,978		129,875
Storage					36,283		32,462
Motel					27,882		28,035
Warehouse					18,274		25,398
Nursing home ⁽¹⁾					16,243		16,315
Mobile home park	20,783		19,970		15,697		16,003
Warehouse	22,611		22,701
Storage	32,031		32,201
Other non-residential	51,405		44,768		23,804		23,889
Total commercial real estate	366,774		361,842		384,686		373,819

Construction/land:
One-to-four family residential	97,779		87,404		84,191		86,604
Multifamily	85,773		108,439		87,748		83,642
Commercial	5,735		5,325		22,400		18,300
Land	13,299		36,405		6,965		6,740
Total construction/land	202,586		237,573		201,304		195,286
Total commercial, multifamily and construction/land loans	$	759,752	$	784,317
Total multifamily, commercial and construction/land loans					$	753,833	$	738,460

____________

⁽¹⁾LIP for nursing home loans at December 31, 2018 was $21,000. There was no LIP on these loans at March 31, 2019.

The LIP related to our construction/land loans ~~decreased~~increased by ~~$6.9 million~~$341,000 as ~~draws and payoffs of existing construction loans outpaced~~ originations during the ~~first quarter of 2018.~~three months ended March 31, 2019 outpaced draws on these loans. Included in total construction/land loans at March 31, ~~2018~~2019, are ~~$61.5~~$72.3 million of multifamily loans, ~~$5.7~~$22.4 million of commercial real estate loans and ~~$2.6~~$4.1 million of one-to-four family loans that will roll over to permanent loans at the completion of their construction period in accordance with the terms of the construction/land loan. At December 31, 2018, construction/land loans included $66.6 million of multifamily loans, $18.3 million of commercial real estate loans and $1.7 million of one-to-four family loans that roll over to permanent loans in accordance with the terms of the construction/land loan.

To assist in our strategic initiatives for loan growth and to achieve geographic diversification, the Bank will originate and purchase loans and utilize loan participations with the underlying collateral located within areas of Washington State outside our primary market area or in other states. The Bank’s goal with respect to loan participations is to locate a selling bank that is unable to make an entire loan due to legal or lending concentration limitations. Sellers of these loans are reviewed for management/lending experience, financial condition, asset quality metrics, and regulatory matters. Loans acquired through participation or purchase must meet the Bank’s underwriting standards. During the three months ended March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, the Bank purchased ~~$815,000~~$17.6 million of ~~one-to-four family residential~~loans that included $16.6 million of commercial real estate loans secured by properties located outside of Washington State, and $1.0 million of consumer loans secured by automobiles to borrowers located in Washington ~~State.~~and other states.

The majority of our loan portfolio continues to be secured by properties located in our primary market area, however a significant amount is secured by properties in other areas of Washington, in California, and in other states. At March 31, ~~2018,~~ 2019,

total loans secured by collateral located in California represented ~~4.5%~~3.9% of our total loans, net of LIP and total loans secured by collateral located outside the states of California and Washington represented ~~7.2%~~9.9% of our total loans, net of LIP. The following table details geographic concentrations in our loan portfolio, net of LIP:


	At March 31, 2018															At March 31, 2019
	One-to-four family residential		Multifamily		Commercial real estate		Construction/land		Business		Consumer		Total			One-to-Four Family Residential		Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate		Construction/Land		Business		Consumer		Total
	(In thousands)															(In thousands)
King County	$	224,232	$	115,941	$	183,826	$	105,603	$	13,997	$	9,422	$	653,021		$	276,890	$	98,495	$	197,833	$	101,461	$	12,975	$	11,722	$	699,376
Pierce County	34,559		10,548		28,226		7,915		—		631		81,879			32,145		5,076		26,957		8,761		—		842		73,781
Snohomish County	21,992		3,217		33,960		171		33		334		59,707			23,596		3,248		21,037		1,910		2,952		315		53,058
Kitsap County	2,132		1,513		804		2,834		—		78		7,361			5,815		1,484		777		2,241		—		—		10,317
Other Washington Counties															9,775	9,460		25,172		46,290		137		1,283		491		82,833
California	2,768		17,782		23,849		—		376		—		44,775			2,717		17,606		19,862		—		1,120		105		41,410
Other Washington Counties	9,484		24,260		49,647		1,031		1,328		546		86,296
Outside Washington and California ⁽¹⁾	728		17,131		45,919		—		8,503		120		72,401			709		16,762		71,930		—		15,183		861		105,445
Total loans, net of LIP	$	295,895	$	190,392	$	366,231	$	117,554	$	24,237	$	11,131	$	1,005,440		$	351,332	$	167,843	$	384,686	$	114,510	$	33,513	$	14,336	$	1,066,220

_______________

⁽¹⁾Includes loans in Oregon, Arizona, Utah and 1923 other states.

Our five largest borrowing relationships, which represent ~~8.2%~~7.9% of our net loans, ~~decreased~~increased by ~~$5.6~~$4.6 million to ~~$82.9~~$84.5 million at March 31, ~~2018~~2019, from ~~$88.5~~$79.9 million at December 31, ~~2017.~~2018. The total number of loans represented by this group of borrowers remained relatively stable ~~at 18~~with 20 loans at March 31, ~~2018~~2019, and 19 loans at December 31, ~~2017.~~2018. At March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, all five borrowers were current on their loan payments. We monitor the performance of these borrowing relationships very closely due to their concentration risk in relation to the entire loan portfolio.

The following table details our five largest lending relationships at March 31, ~~2018:~~2019:


Borrower ⁽¹⁾	Number of Loans	One-to-Four Family Residential ⁽²⁾		Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate		Construction/ Land		Business		Aggregate Balance of Loans ⁽³⁾		Number of Loans	One-to-Four Family Residential ⁽²⁾		Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate		Construction/Land		Business		Consumer		Aggregate Balance of Loans ⁽³⁾
	(Dollars in thousands)													(Dollars in thousands)
Real estate investor	5	$	—	$	8,738	$	13,423	$	—	$	—	$	22,161	5	$	—	$	8,574	$	13,194	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	21,768
Real estate investor	4	—		—		—		6,886		12,493		19,379		3	420		—		18,952		—		—		—		19,372
Real estate investor	4	453		—		14,039		—		—		14,492		6	441		—		14,468		—		—		30		14,939
Real estate investor	2	—		8,766		—		4,854		—		13,620		3	—		—		—		3,120		11,149		—		14,269
Real estate investor	3	448		—		12,789		—		—		13,237		3	—		5,054		—		9,109		—		—		14,163
Total	18	$	901	$	17,504	$	40,251	$	11,740	$	12,493	$	82,889	20	$	861	$	13,628	$	46,614	$	12,229	$	11,149	$	30	$	84,511

________


⁽¹⁾	The composition of borrowers represented in the table may change between periods.


⁽²⁾	All of the one-to-four family residential loans for these borrowers are for owner occupied properties. The commercial real estate loans are for non-owner occupied properties.


⁽³⁾	Net of LIP.

The ALLL increased to ~~$13.1~~$13.8 million at March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, from ~~$12.9~~$13.3 million at December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, and represented ~~1.3%~~1.30% and 1.29% of total loans receivable, net of LIP at ~~both~~ March 31, ~~2018~~2019, and December 31, ~~2017.~~2018, respectively. The ALLL consists of two components, the general allowance and the specific reserves. The increase in the ALLL was primarily the result of growth in our loan portfolio ~~and consisted of~~with a ~~$266,000~~$473,000 increase in the general ~~reserve, partially offset by~~reserve. Specific reserves decreased $12,000 as a ~~$40,000~~result of a decrease in the ~~specific reserves.~~balance of our impaired loans. For additional information, see “Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended March 31, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018 - Provision for Loan Losses” discussed below.

We believe that the ALLL at March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, was adequate to absorb the probable and inherent risks of loss in the loan portfolio at that date. While we believe the estimates and assumptions used in our determination of the adequacy of the allowance are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such estimates and assumptions will be proven correct in the future, that the actual amount of future losses will not exceed the amount of past provisions, or that any increased provisions that may be required will not adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations. Future additions to the allowance may become necessary based upon changing economic conditions, the level of problem loans, business conditions, credit concentrations, increased loan balances, or changes in the underlying collateral of the loan portfolio. In addition, the determination of the amount of our ALLL is subject to review by bank regulators as part of the routine examination process, which may result in the establishment of additional loss reserves or the charge-off of specific loans against established loss reserves based upon their judgment of information available to them at the time of their examination.

As we work with our borrowers that face difficult financial circumstances, we explore various options available to minimize our risk of loss. At times, the best option for our customers and the Bank is to modify the loan for a period of time, usually one year or less. Certain loan modifications are accounted for as troubled debt restructured loans (“TDRs”). These modifications have included a reduction in interest rate on the loan for a period of time, advancing the maturity date of the loan, or allowing interest-only payments for a specific time frame. These modifications are granted only when there is a reasonable and attainable restructured loan plan that has been agreed to by the borrower and is considered to be in the Bank’s best interest.

The following table presents a breakdown of our TDRs at the dates ~~indicated:~~

indicated, all of which were performing:


	March 31, 2018			December 31, 2017			Three Month Change			March 31, 2019			December 31, 2018			Three Month Change
	(Dollars in thousands)									(Dollars in thousands)
Total nonperforming TDRs	—			—			—

Performing TDRs:
One-to-four family residential	11,904			13,434			(1,530		)	$	5,656		$	6,941		$	(1,285	)
Multifamily	1,128			1,134			(6		)
Commercial real estate	3,173			3,194			(21		)	2,156			2,415			(259		)
Consumer	43			43			—			—			43			(43		)
Total performing TDRs	16,248			17,805			(1,557		)	7,812			9,399			(1,587		)
Total TDRs	$	16,248		$	17,805		$	(1,557	)	$	7,812		$	9,399		$	(1,587	)
% TDRs classified as performing	100.0		%	100.0		%				100.0		%	100.0		%

Our TDRs decreased $1.6 million at March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, compared to December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, as a result of principal repayments and loan payoffs. At March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, there were no TDRs on nonaccrual status. In addition, there were no committed but undisbursed funds in connection with our TDRs and impaired loans. The largest TDR relationship at March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, totaled ~~$4.9~~$1.3 million and ~~consisted of $4.2 million in one-to-four family residential rental properties and $735,000 in an owner~~was secured by a non-owner occupied commercial property ~~all~~ located in King County.

Loans are considered past due if a scheduled principal or interest payment is due and unpaid for 30 days or more. At March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, total past due loans represented ~~0.02%~~0.03% of total loans receivable, as compared to ~~0.01%~~0.08% at December 31, ~~2017.~~2018.

Nonperforming assets ~~remained stable with~~decreased by $630,000 during the first three months of 2019, primarily as a ~~balance~~result of ~~$658,000 at March 31, 2018, compared to $662,000 at December 31, 2017.~~payoffs of two nonaccrual loans totaling $597,000. The following table presents detailed information on our nonperforming assets at the dates indicated:


	March 31, 2018			December 31, 2017			Three Month Change			March 31, 2019			December 31, 2018			Three Month Change
	(Dollars in thousands)									(Dollars in thousands)
Nonperforming loans:
One-to-four family residential	$	125		$	128		$	(3	)	$	107		$	382		$	(275	)
Commercial real estate										—			326			(326		)
Consumer	50			51			(1		)	44			44			—
Total nonperforming loans	175			179			(4		)	151			752			(601		)

OREO	483			483			—			454			483			(29		)
Total nonperforming assets ⁽¹⁾	$	658		$	662		$	(4	)	$	605		$	1,235		$	(630	)

Nonperforming assets as a percent of total assets	0.05		%	0.05		%				0.05		%	0.10		%

^____________

⁽¹⁾ The difference between nonperforming assets reported above, and the totals reported by other industry sources, is due to their inclusion of all TDRs as nonperforming loans, although 100.0% of our TDRs were performing in accordance with their restructured terms at March 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

Nonaccrual loans are loans that are 90 days or more delinquent or other loans which, in management's opinion, the borrower is unable to meet scheduled payment obligations. ~~Principal repayments on~~The largest nonaccrual ~~loans decreased the balance to $175,000~~loan at March 31, ~~2018, from $179,000 at December 31, 2017. There were no loan charge-offs or loans added to nonaccrual status during the first quarter of 2018.~~

~~The three~~2019 was a $107,000 owner occupied, single-family residence located in Snohomish County. Also included in nonaccrual loans ~~in the loan portfolio~~ at March 31, ~~2018, included~~2019, was a ~~$124,000 one-to-four family residential loan secured by an owner occupied single family residence in Snohomish County, a $50,000~~$44,000 home equity second mortgage secured by ~~an owner occupied single family residence in King County, and~~ a ~~$1,000 one-to-four family residential loan secured by an owner~~non-owner occupied single family residence in King County. ~~Each~~At March 31, 2019, both of these loans iswere current on ~~its~~their loan payments.

We continue to focus our efforts on working with borrowers to bring their loans current or converting nonaccrual loans to OREO and subsequently selling the properties. By taking ownership of these properties, we can generally convert nonearning assets into earning assets on a more timely basis than which may otherwise be the case. Our success in this area is reflected by the low ratio of our nonperforming assets as a percent of total assets of 0.05% at ~~both~~ March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, and 0.10% at December 31, ~~2017.~~2018, as well as the minimal amount of OREO held at March 31, 2019.

OREO. OREO includes properties acquired by the Bank through foreclosure or acceptance of a deed in lieu of foreclosure. At March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, OREO was $454,000 and $483,000, respectively, and consisted of two ~~raw land properties~~undeveloped commercial lots located in Pierce ~~County with carrying values of $270,000 and $213,000.~~

~~The following table presents a breakdown of our OREO by county and number of properties at~~County. During the three months ended March 31, ~~2018:~~

County Total OREO Number of Properties Percent of
Total OREO
King Pierce Kitsap Mason
(Dollars in thousands)
OREO:
Commercial real estate ⁽¹⁾
—
$ 483
$ —
$ —
$ 483
2
100.0 %
Total OREO $ —
$ 483
$ —
$ —
$ 483
2
100.0 %

⁽¹⁾~~The two commercial real estate~~2019, a $29,000 write-down was recognized on these properties ~~are undeveloped lots.~~as the result of an updated valuation analysis.

Intangible assets. The balance of goodwill was $889,000 at both March 31, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017.~~2018. Goodwill was calculated as the excess purchase price of the branches acquired in ~~the Branch Acquisition~~August 2017 (the “Branch Acquisition”) over the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities ~~assumed at August 25, 2017.~~assumed.

The core deposit intangible (“CDI”) recorded as part of the Branch Acquisition represents the fair value of the customer relationships on the acquired noninterest-bearing checking, interest-bearing checking, savings, and money market accounts. The CDI balance was ~~$1.2 million and $1.3~~$1.1 million at March 31, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017, respectively.~~2018. The initial ratio of CDI to the acquired balances of core deposits was 2.23%. This amount amortizes into noninterest expense on an accelerated basis over ten years.

Deposits. During the first three months of ~~2018,~~2019, deposits increased ~~$23.7~~$16.2 million to ~~$863.2~~$955.3 million at March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, compared to ~~$839.5~~$939.0 million at December 31, ~~2017.~~2018. Deposit accounts consisted of the following:

March 31, 2018 Change from December 31, 2017 Percent Change
(Dollars in thousands)
Noninterest-bearing $ 48,135
$ 2,701
5.9 %
Interest-bearing checking 40,804
2,580
6.7
Statement savings 26,388
(2,068 ) (7.3 )
Money market 334,508
15,872
5.0
Certificates of deposit, retail 337,906
4,642
1.4
Certificates of deposit, brokered 75,488

—

—

$ 863,229

$ 23,727

2.8

Our geographic footprint continues to expand with growth in our branches both acquired and opened in 2017. The balances at our four acquired branches have remained stable with a net increase of $853,000 at March 31, 2018 compared to August 25, 2017, the acquisition date. In addition, our branch in the Crossroads community of Bellevue, Washington had an increase in deposits of $18.8 million during the first three months of 2018. The balance of money market and checking accounts

4240



	March 31, 2019		Change from December 31, 2018			Percent Change
	(Dollars in thousands)
Noninterest-bearing	$	46,026	$	(82	)	(0.2	)%
Interest-bearing checking	51,096		11,017			27.5
Statement savings	23,770		(1,029		)	(4.1	)
Money market	312,057		(26,990		)	(8.0	)
Certificates of deposit, retail	398,956		7,782			2.0
Certificates of deposit, brokered	123,367		25,542			26.1
	$	955,272	$	16,240		1.7

Our retail deposits decreased by $9.3 million during the three months ended March 31, 2019. Money market accounts declined by $27.0 million as a number of customers actively used their account funds for project development or home purchases during the quarter. Partially offsetting this decrease, interest-bearing checking accounts increased by $11.0 million as these accounts continue to increase steadily in response to our customer expansion and marketing efforts. Also contributing to the increase in funds, retail certificates of deposit increased by $7.8 million as ~~we focus our marketing efforts on increasing~~the Bank competitively priced select terms of these ~~core deposits. Our growth to ten branch locations supports our goal to grow and diversify our deposit base.~~products for funding purposes.

~~Our~~To further assist in our funding needs, our portfolio of brokered certificates of deposits ~~remained at $75.5~~increased by $25.5 million to $123.4 million at March 31, ~~2018, unchanged~~2019, from $97.8 million at December 31, ~~2017. We may add~~2018. This increase was primarily the result of an opportunity to ~~our portfolio~~raise funds in the brokered deposit market at an interest rate of ~~these brokered deposits as a source of additional funding~~2.34% for three months, commencing in ~~future periods.~~early March 2019. The Bank raised $35.0 million on those terms and used the funds to pay down overnight FHLB advances that cost approximately 2.60%. While brokered certificates of deposit may carry a higher cost than our retail certificates, their remaining maturity periods of 4up to ~~36 months,~~4.5 years, along with the enhanced call features on a portion of these deposits, assist us in our efforts to manage interest rate risk.

At March 31, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, we held ~~$22.2~~$25.7 million and ~~$21.5~~$28.5 million in public funds, respectively, ~~nearly all of which were~~primarily in retail certificates of ~~deposit.~~deposit and money market accounts.

Advances. We use advances from the FHLB as an alternative funding source to manage interest rate risk and to leverage our balance sheet. Total FHLB advances were ~~$200.0~~$163.5 million at March 31, ~~2018, down~~2019, a $17.0 million increase from ~~$216.0~~$146.5 million at December 31, ~~2017.~~2018. At March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, the Bank had ~~$150.0~~$108.5 million in borrowings that are due in less than one year and ~~$50.0~~$55.0 million in borrowings that are due in ~~one~~two to three years. Our ~~short-term~~long-term advances at March 31, ~~2018 included a $40.0 million~~2019, consisted of three Member Option Variable Rate ~~advance~~advances that ~~reprices~~reprice quarterly and ~~allows~~allow prepayment without penalties at the repricing ~~date and $88.5~~date. In addition, we held $48.5 million in ~~Fed Funds, both~~overnight FHLB advances at that date. The repayment option on our Member Option Variable Rate advances and short term nature of ~~which allow~~overnight FHLB advances provides us flexibility to adjust the level of our borrowings as our customer deposit balances ~~grow. In addition,~~grow consistent with our ~~total~~asset/liability objectives. Our FHLB advances ~~at March 31, 2018 was~~also include a $50.0 million ~~three-month fixed-rate~~fixed rate three‑month advance that renews quarterly at the fixed interest rate in effect at that time designated as ~~a hedge instrument in~~ a cash flow hedge, as described below.

Cash Flow Hedge. To assist in managing interest rate risk, the Bank entered into a five-year, $50 million notional, pay fixed, receive floating cash flow hedge or interest rate swap with a qualified institution on October 25, 2016. Under the terms of the Cash Flow Hedge agreement, the Bank pays a fixed rate of 1.34% for five years and, in turn, receives an interest payment based on the three-month LIBOR index, which resets quarterly. Concurrently, the Bank borrowed a $50.0 million fixed rate three-month advance that will be renewed quarterly at the fixed interest rate in effect at that time. ~~Effectiveness of the swap is evaluated quarterly with any ineffectiveness recognized as a gain or a loss on the income statement in noninterest income.~~ A change in the fair value of the cash flow hedge is recognized as an other asset or other liability on the balance sheet with the tax-effected portion of the change included in other comprehensive income. At March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, we recognized a ~~$2.2~~$1.2 million fair value asset as a result of the increase in the market value of the hedge agreement.

Stockholders’ Equity. Total stockholders’ equity ~~increased $6.2~~decreased $2.0 million during the first three months of ~~2018~~2019 to ~~$148.8~~$151.7 million at March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, from ~~$142.6~~$153.7 million at December 31, ~~2017.~~2018. The ~~primary source of the increase~~decrease was ~~a $6.1 million increase in retained earnings as~~primarily the result of ~~$6.8~~common stock repurchases of $4.2 million as well as $807,000 in cash dividends paid to shareholders. Partially offsetting these decreases, net income of $1.9 million was recognized for the ~~first quarter~~three months ended March 31, 2019. In addition, other comprehensive income increased by $415,000, primarily due to improvements in the fair market value of ~~2018 partially offset by shareholder dividends~~our available-for-sale investments. Stock based compensation resulted in a $569,000 increase to equity. New restricted stock awards resulted in 16,698 shares being issued, and the net settlement of ~~$717,000, or $0.07 per share, paid~~previously granted restricted stock that vested during the three months ended March 31, ~~2018. Additional~~2019, resulted in the cancellation of 5,929 shares.

As part of the strategy to increase shareholder value, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase plan that began on November 5, 2018 and expires on May 3, 2019. The plan authorizes the repurchase of up to 550,000 shares of ~~common~~the Company’s stock ~~were issued during~~in accordance with a plan established under the ~~first quarter~~guidelines specified under Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as administered through an independent broker. For the three months ended March 31, 2019, the Company repurchased 263,800 shares at an average cost of $15.76 per share. From the onset of the plan on November 5, 2018 ~~with~~through March 31, 2019, the ~~exercise~~Company has repurchased a total of ~~10,000 stock options and awarding~~467,700 shares at an average cost of ~~20,987 shares of restricted stock.~~$15.62 per share.

The following table shows cash dividends paid per share and the related dividend payout ratio for the periods indicated:


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018			2017			2019			2018

Dividend declared per common share	$	0.07		$	0.06		$	0.08		$	0.07
Dividend payout ratio ⁽¹⁾	10.5		%	26.1		%	42.1		%	10.5		%

______________

⁽¹⁾Dividends paid per common share divided by basic earnings per common share.

Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended March 31, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018

General. Net income for the three months ended March 31, ~~2018~~2019, was ~~$6.8~~$1.9 million, or ~~$0.66~~$0.19 per diluted share as compared to net income of ~~$2.3~~$6.8 million, or ~~$0.22~~$0.66 per diluted share for the quarter ended March 31, 2017. The $4.5 million increase in net income during the first quarter of 2018 was primarily the result of a $2.1 million increase in net interest income and the recognition of a $4.0 million recapture of provision for loan loss for the three months ended March 31, ~~2018, partially offset by~~2018. The $4.9 million decrease in net income during the three months ended March 31, 2019, was primarily the result of a ~~$959,000 increase~~$400,000 provision for loan losses compared to a recapture of provision for loan losses of $4.0 million and $1.1 million decrease in ~~noninterest expense.~~net interest income as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2018.

Net Interest Income. Net interest income for the ~~quarter~~three months ended March 31, ~~2018 increased $2.1~~2019, decreased $1.1 million to ~~$11.0~~$9.9 million ~~as compared to $8.9~~from $11.0 million for the ~~first quarter in 2017~~three months ended March 31, 2018. The decrease was due ~~in part~~primarily to the growth in the average balance of net loans outstanding between periods, partially offset by increased interest expense due to higher deposit balances and increasing short term interest rates. A significant contributor to this increase was the receipt of an additional $1.0 million in loan interest income during the first three months of 2018 from the payoff of the remaining balances on previously charged off loans. ~~Our average interest earning assets~~

Interest income increased by ~~$162.8 million and the average yield increased 46 basis points~~$458,000 for the ~~first quarter of 2018,~~three months ended March 31, 2019, as compared to the same period in ~~2017.~~ 2018, primarily as a result of a $37.5 million increase in the average balance of our interest-earning assets. Average loans receivable increased by $46.2 million, and was partially offset by a $1.8 million decrease in investments available-for-sale and a $5.2 million decrease in average interest-earning deposits, as lower yielding assets were converted to higher yielding loans. In addition, the average balance of FHLB stock decreased by $1.7 million as our required activity stock decreased due to lower average FHLB advances outstanding.

The average yield on our interest-earning assets was unchanged for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, remaining at 4.98% as the 15 basis point decrease in the average yield on our loan portfolio was offset by yield increases in our investments available‑for‑sale and interest-earning deposits. However, the 5.37% average yield on loans ~~receivable~~ for the ~~first quarter of~~three months ended March 31, 2018 was unusually high as a result of the $1.0 million in interest received from the payoff of certain previously charged off ~~loans. There was~~loans, and no such additional interest ~~income~~ recognized in the ~~quarter~~three months ended March 31, ~~2017.~~2019. Loan originations during the same period in the prior year were generally made at higher market rates as compared to the existing loan portfolio. In addition, the volume of variable rate loans increased to 53.8% at March 31, 2019, from 50.2% at March 31, 2018, thereby generating higher yields from market rate increases over the past year.

~~The average balance of our interest-bearing liabilities~~Interest expense increased by ~~$153.2~~$1.6 million ~~during~~for the ~~first quarter of 2018~~three months ended March 31, 2019, as compared to the same period in ~~2017~~2018, primarily as ~~our customer~~a result of increases in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities, in particular money market deposits, certificates of deposit and ~~borrowings increased~~FHLB advances. In response to ~~meet~~market rate increases, the ~~funding needs~~average cost of our ~~loan portfolio. In~~interest-bearing deposits increased by 61 basis points and the average cost of our FHLB advances increased by 60 basis points for the three months ended March 31, 2019, as compared to the same period in 2018. Also contributing to the increase in interest expense during these periods, the average balance of our interest-bearing deposits increased by $76.8 million, with $50.5 million of this from growth in our retail operations and $26.3 million from an increase in brokered certificates of deposit. Money market interest expense increased by $313,000 as a result of a 42 basis point increase in the average cost of these funds partially offset by a $9.7 million decrease in the average balance of these deposits. The cost of retail and brokered certificates of deposit increased by 78 and 63 basis points,

respectively, as the growth in the rates needed to compete for these deposits in the marketplace have increased in response to increases in the ~~short-term~~Federal Funds targeted rate. The growth in our retail and brokered deposits more than met our funding needs, allowing the Bank to pay down certain FHLB advances resulting in a $47.6 million decrease in the average balance of these borrowings for the three months ended March 31, 2019, as compared to the same period in 2018.

The Company’s net interest margin and interest rate spread decreased by 59 basis points and 51 basis points, respectively, primarily due to increases in our cost of funds as our interest‑bearing liabilities generally reprice faster than our interest-earning assets in response to changes in market interest ~~rates,~~rates. For more information on this, see “How We Measure the ~~cost~~Risk of ~~our interest-bearing liabilities has increased by 24 basis points between these same time periods.~~Interest Rate Changes” in Item 3 of this report.

The following table details the change in net interest income due to changes in yield or cost, or changes in the average balance of the related asset or liability:


	Three Months Ended March 31, 2018 Compared to March 31, 2017 Net Change									Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 Compared to March 31, 2018 Net Change in Interest
	Rate			Volume			Total			Rate			Volume			Total
	(In thousands)									(In thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable, net	$	1,064		$	1,951		$	3,015		$	(372	)	$	611		$	239
Investments available-for-sale	(3		)	87			84			242			(12		)	230
Interest-earning deposits with banks	17			(23		)	(6		)	19			(17		)	2
FHLB stock	6			16			22			5			(18		)	(13		)
Total net change in income on interest-earning assets	1,084			2,031			3,115			(106		)	564			458

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand	(9		)	15			6			(6		)	2			(4		)
Statement savings	(2		)	—			(2		)	—			(1		)	(1		)
Money market	320			162			482			336			(23		)	313
Certificates of deposit, retail	150			(67		)	83			760			205			965
Certificates of deposit, brokered	16			—			16			160			113			273
Advances from the FHLB	312			96			408			239			(195		)	44
Total net change in expense on interest-bearing liabilities	787			206			993			1,489			101			1,590
Total net change in net interest income	$	297		$	1,825		$	2,122		$	(1,595	)	$	463		$	(1,132	)

The $3.0 million increase in loan interest income during the first quarter of 2018, as compared to the same period in 2017, was a combined result of a $160.5 million increase in the average outstanding loan balance with an increase in the average loan yield of 44 basis points. While a portion of the yield increase was due to the receipt of $1.0 million in additional interest income discussed above, loan originations during the past year at generally higher market rates, and the variable rate nature of our construction loan portfolio also helped to increase the average yield on our loan portfolio.

Interest expense increased by $993,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2018, as compared to the same period in 2017, primarily as a result of increases in the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities, in particular money market interest deposits and FHLB advances. The average balance of our interest-bearing liabilities increased $153.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2017 to support the growth in our financial assets. The average balance of deposits increased by $116.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017. Money market interest expenses increased by $482,000 as a result of a $120.3 million increase in the average balance combined with a 39 basis point increase in the cost of these funds. We have focused on increasing our core deposits, with a large portion of the growth coming from our Branch Acquisition in 2017 where 43.8% of the funds were in money market

4443

~~accounts. The average cost of our interest-bearing deposits increased by 15 basis points for the three months ended March 31, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017.~~

In further support of our asset growth, average borrowings at the FHLB increased by $37.0 million to $208.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018, and the average cost of these funds increased 61 basis points as compared to the same period in 2017. At March 31, 2018, the Bank held $88.5 million in overnight advances and $40.0 million in a Member Option Variable Rate advance that reprices quarterly. In addition, as discussed above, to assist in managing interest rate risk, on October 25, 2016, the Bank entered into a five-year, $50.0 million notional, pay fixed, receive floating cash flow hedge or interest rate swap at a fixed rate of 1.34% for five years and concurrently borrowed a $50.0 million fixed rate three-month advance that renews quarterly at the fixed interest rate in effect at that time. At March 31, 2018, this hedge continued to provide us with the intended interest rate risk protection in a rising interest rate environment.

The following table compares detailed average balances, related interest income or interest expense, associated yields and rates, and the resulting net interest margin for the three months ended March 31, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017.~~2018. Nonaccrual loans are included in the average balance of net loans receivable and are considered to carry a zero yield.


	Three Months Ended March 31,												Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018						2017						2019						2018
	Average Balance		Interest Earned / Paid		Yield / Cost		Average Balance		Interest Earned / Paid		Yield / Cost		Average Balance		Interest Earned / Paid		Yield / Cost		Average Balance		Interest Earned / Paid		Yield / Cost
	(Dollars in thousands)												(Dollars in thousands)
Assets
Loans receivable, net	$	985,799	$	13,042	5.37	%	$	825,251	$	10,027	4.93	%	$	1,031,994	$	13,281	5.22	%	$	985,799	$	13,042	5.37	%
Investments available-for-sale	142,236		929		2.65		128,993		845		2.66		140,433		1,159		3.35		142,236		929		2.65
Interest-earning deposits with banks	11,717		38		1.32		24,233		44		0.74		6,484		40		2.50		11,717		38		1.32
FHLB stock	9,593		104		4.40		8,034		82		4.14		7,888		91		4.68		9,593		104		4.40
Total interest-earning assets	1,149,345		14,113		4.98		986,511		10,998		4.52		1,186,799		14,571		4.98		1,149,345		14,113		4.98
Noninterest earning assets	69,073						59,962						72,103						69,073
Total average assets	$	1,218,418					$	1,046,473					$	1,258,902					$	1,218,418

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Interest-bearing demand	$	38,350	$	22	0.23	%	$	19,481	$	16	0.33	%	$	42,579	$	18	0.17	%	$	38,350	$	22	0.23	%
Statement savings	27,342		9		0.13		28,072		11		0.16		24,146		8		0.13		27,342		9		0.13
Money market	330,141		765		0.94		209,843		283		0.55		320,411		1,078		1.36		330,141		765		0.94
Certificates of deposit, retail	333,130		1,155		1.41		355,414		1,072		1.22		392,337		2,120		2.19		333,130		1,155		1.41
Certificates of deposit, brokered	75,488		325		1.75		75,488		309		1.66		101,787		598		2.38		75,488		325		1.75
Total interest-bearing deposits	804,451		2,276		1.15		688,298		1,691		1.00		881,260		3,822		1.76		804,451		2,276		1.15
Advances from the FHLB and other borrowings	208,544		853		1.66		171,500		445		1.05		160,950		897		2.26		208,544		853		1.66
Total interest-bearing liabilities	1,012,995		3,129		1.25		859,798		2,136		1.01		1,042,210		4,719		1.84		1,012,995		3,129		1.25
Noninterest bearing liabilities	60,637						46,129						63,842						60,637
Average equity	144,786						140,546						152,850						144,786
Total average liabilities and equity	$	1,218,418					$	1,046,473					$	1,258,902					$	1,218,418
Net interest income			$	10,984					$	8,862					$	9,852					$	10,984
Net interest margin					3.88	%					3.64	%					3.37	%					3.88	%

Provision for Loan Losses.Management recognizes that loan losses may occur over the life of a loan and that the ALLL must be maintained at a level necessary to absorb specific losses on impaired loans and probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Our methodology for analyzing the ALLL consists of two components: general and specific reserves. The general reserve is determined by applying factors to our various groups of loans. Management considers factors such as charge-off history, the

prevailing economy, the regulatory environment, competition, geographic and loan type concentrations, policy and underwriting standards, nature and volume of the loan portfolio, managements’ experience level, our loan review and grading systems, the value of underlying collateral and the level of problem loans in assessing the ALLL. The specific reserve component is created when management believes that the collectability of a specific loan has been impaired and a loss is probable or a concession is granted that reduces the value of the loan. The specific reserves are computed using discounted cash flows, current appraisals, listed sales prices, and other available information, less costs to complete, if any, and costs to sell the property. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available or if future events differ from current estimates.

During the ~~quarter~~three months ended March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, management evaluated the adequacy of the ALLL and concluded that a ~~recapture of~~ provision for loan losses in the amount of $400,000 was appropriate, primarily as a result of a $28.8 million increase in total loans receivable, net of LIP. In comparison, during the three months ended March 31, 2018, a $4.0 million recapture of provision for

loan losses was ~~appropriate for the quarter. During this period,~~recognized as a result of $4.3 million in recoveries ~~were received. The recoveries were~~received on previously charged off loans, partially offset by ~~increases~~an increase to the allowance for loan losses related to the $2.7 million increase in the balance of our total loans receivable, net of LIP. In comparison, a provision for loan losses of $200,000 was recorded for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, primarily as a result of a $23.9 million increase in the balance of our total loans receivable, net of LIP, for this period.

The following table summarizes selected financial data related to our ALLL and loan portfolio. All loan balances and ratios are calculated using loan balances that are net of LIP.


	At or For the Three Months Ended March 31,						At or For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018			2017			2019			2018
	(Dollars in thousands)						(Dollars in thousands)
Total loans receivable, net of LIP, end of period	$	1,005,440		$	852,104		$	1,066,220		$	1,005,440
Average loans receivable during period	985,799			825,251			1,031,994			985,799
ALLL balance at beginning of period	12,882			10,951			13,347			12,882
(Recapture) provision for loan losses	(4,000		)	200
Provision (recapture) for loan losses							400			(4,000		)
Charge-offs:
Total charge-offs	—			—			—			—
Recoveries:
One-to-four family	4,240			7			24			4,240
Commercial real estate	14			—			—			14
Consumer							37			—
Total recoveries	4,254			7			61			4,254
Net recovery	4,254			7			61			4,254
ALLL balance at end of period	$	13,136		$	11,158		$	13,808		$	13,136
ALLL as a percent of total loans, net of LIP	1.31		%	1.31		%	1.30		%	1.31		%
Ratio of net recoveries to average net loans receivable	1.75			—			0.01			1.75

Noninterest Income. Noninterest income increased ~~$111,000~~$54,000 to $700,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2019, from $646,000 for the quarter ended March 31, ~~2018, from $535,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2017.~~2018. The following table provides a detailed analysis of the changes in the components of noninterest income:


	Three Months Ended March 31, 2018		Change from Three Months Ended March 31, 2017			Percent Change		Three Months Ended March 31, 2019			Change from Three Months Ended March 31, 2018			Percent Change
	(Dollars in thousands)							(Dollars in thousands)
Net loss on sale of investments								$	(8	)	$	(8	)	—	%
BOLI change in cash surrender value	249		48			23.9	%	269			20			8.0
Wealth management revenue	99		(41		)	(29.3	)	196			97			98.0
Deposit related fees	161		90			126.8		171			10			6.2
Loan related fees	134		14			11.7		63			(71		)	(53.0	)
Other	3		—			—		9			6			200.0
Total noninterest income	$	646	$	111		20.7	%	$	700		$	54		8.4	%

~~The increase in noninterest income for~~During the ~~quarter~~three months ended March 31, 2019, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2018, ~~compared to the quarter ended March 31, 2017, was primarily the~~wealth management revenue increased by $97,000 as a result of a $90,000 increase in deposit related fees. The addition of four acquired branches and continued growth in our existing branches over the past year resulted in a corresponding increase in ATM and debit card related fees as well as other fees from an increase in ~~transaction volume.~~

the total assets managed by our wealth management division and regular fluctuations in the timing and mix of commissions received on serviced accounts. Noninterest income from our BOLI policies increased ~~by $48,000~~ as a result of annual dividends received during the purchase of $4.3 million of new BOLI policies in the second quarter of 2017. Partially offsetting this increase in noninterest income, our wealth management services revenue decreased by $41,000 for the quarterthree months ended March 31, 2019, as compared to lower income for the three months ended March 31, 2018 as policy expenses were deducted from earnings over the first year subsequent to the purchase date of certain policies in 2017.

Partially offsetting these increases, loan related fees decreased $71,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2019 as compared to the same period in ~~2017 due to~~2018, primarily as a ~~reduction~~result of additional fees collected on interest rate swap agreements and other loan fees collected in ~~fee revenue received and a reduction in sales staff.~~the first three months of 2018.

Noninterest Expense. Noninterest expense increased ~~$959,000~~$682,000 to $7.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019, from $7.0 million for the ~~quarter ended March 31, 2018, from $6.1 million for the~~ comparable ~~quarter~~period in ~~2017.~~2018.

The following table provides a detailed analysis of the changes in the components of noninterest expense:


	Three Months Ended March 31, 2018		Change from Three Months Ended March 31, 2017			Percent Change		Three Months Ended March 31, 2019		Change from Three Months Ended March 31, 2018			Percent Change
	(Dollars in thousands)							(Dollars in thousands)
Salaries and employee benefits	$	4,662	$	377		8.8	%	$	5,000	$	338		7.3	%
Occupancy and equipment	769		289			60.2		866		97			12.6
Professional fees	328		(111		)	(25.3	)	496		168			51.2
Data processing	324		84			35.0		518		194			59.9
OREO related expenses, net	1		(39		)	(97.5	)	31		30			3,000.0
Regulatory assessments	155		59			61.5		137		(18		)	(11.6	)
Insurance and bond premiums	106		7			7.1		105		(1		)	(0.9	)
Marketing	107		59			122.9		86		(21		)	(19.6	)
Other general and administrative	575		234			68.6		470		(105		)	(18.3	)
Total noninterest expense	$	7,027	$	959		15.8	%	$	7,709	$	682		9.7	%

Expenses for salaries and employee benefits increased ~~$377,000~~$338,000 for the ~~first quarter of 2018,~~three months ended March 31, 2019, as compared to the same period in ~~2017. As~~2018, as a result of annual employee salary increases and increased staff to support of our ~~de novo branches, the Branch Acquisition~~growth and the development of new ~~products, the number of full time employees increased to 144 at March 31, 2018, from 121 at March 31, 2017.~~products. In addition to the impact on employee expenses, the increase in the number of our branch locations over the last year resulted in a ~~$289,000~~$97,000 increase in occupancy and equipment expenses. Professional fees for legal, accounting and other services increased by $168,000 in support of our expanded operations and additional tax planning research to maximize our benefit from the 2017 Tax Act. Data processing expense increased by $194,000 as a result of additional core processor fees and computer software to support growth and improve our network security.

~~Other~~Partially offsetting these increases, other general and administrative expenses ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$234,000~~$105,000 for the three months ended March 31, ~~2018, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2017, primarily~~2019 as a result of ~~operational growth and our branch expansion. The largest increase occurred due~~the receipt of $125,000 from an insurance claim related to ~~a $49,000 increase~~the $225,000 fraud loss reported in ~~state taxes resulting from increased income and~~ the ~~addition~~fourth quarter of California state taxes as a result of our California based loans. In addition, the CDI recognized from our Branch Acquisition amortizes over ten years, resulting in $38,000 in noninterest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2018.

Federal Income Tax Expense. ~~As of January 1, 2018, our statutory~~Income before federal income ~~tax rate was 21%,~~taxes decreased by $6.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019 as compared to ~~35%~~the same period in 2018 due to lower pre-tax net income, resulting in a $1.3 million decrease in the provision for ~~prior years.~~income taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2019. We recorded federal income tax provisions of $498,000 and $1.8 million ~~and $785,000~~ for the three months ended March 31, 2019, and 2018, and 2017, respectively, primarily as a result of our pre-tax net income. During the first three months of 2018 and 2017, the exercise of certain stock options resulted in a tax benefit, partially offsetting the quarterly tax provision.respectively.

Liquidity

We are required to have enough cash flow in order to maintain sufficient liquidity to ensure a safe and sound operation. We maintain cash flows above the minimum level believed to be adequate to meet the requirements of normal operations, including potential deposit outflows. On a daily basis, we review and update cash flow projections to ensure that adequate liquidity is maintained.

Our primary sources of funds are customer deposits, cash flow from the loan and investment portfolios, advances from the FHLB, and to a lesser extent, brokered certificates of deposit. These funds, together with equity, are used to make loans, acquire investment securities and other assets, and fund continuing operations. At March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, retail certificates of deposit of $169.9 million and brokered certificates of deposit of $68.7 million were scheduled to mature in one year or ~~less totaled $180.2 million.~~less. Management’s practice is to maintain deposit rates at levels that are competitive with other local financial institutions. While maturities and the scheduled amortization of loans are a predictable source of funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments are greatly influenced by the level of interest rates, economic conditions and competition. We measure our liquidity based on our ability to fund our assets and to meet liability obligations when they come due. Liquidity (and funding) risk occurs when funds cannot be raised at

reasonable prices or in a reasonable time frame to meet our normal or unanticipated obligations. We regularly monitor the mix between our assets and our liabilities to manage effectively our liquidity and funding requirements.

When deposits are not readily available and/or cost effective to provide the funds for our assets, we use alternative funding sources. These sources include, but are not limited to: advances from the FHLB or the FRB, which are collateral dependent, wholesale funding, national certificates of deposit listing services, brokered deposits, federal funds purchased and dealer repurchase agreements, as well as other short-term alternatives. We may also liquidate assets to meet our funding needs. The balance of our investments available-for-sale ~~increased $10.6~~decreased $3.5 million ~~from December 31, 2017,~~ to ~~$142.9~~$138.7 million at March 31, 2019, from December 31, 2018, and represents a ready source of cash if needed. The balance of our interest-earning deposits with banks increased by ~~$7.0~~$5.7 million to $14.6 million at March 31, 2019, from December 31, ~~2017 to March 31,~~ 2018, as ~~we continued to transfer excess cash into higher yielding assets.~~a result of fluctuations in our funding needs for loans receivable and retail deposits. At March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, the Bank maintained credit facilities with the FHLB totaling ~~$422.9~~$562.8 million, with an outstanding balance of ~~$200.0~~$163.5 million. ~~At March 31, 2018,~~As further funding sources, we also had ~~available a total of~~the ability to borrow $95.8 million from the FRB and $35.0 million from unused lines of credit ~~facilities~~ with other financial institutions, with no balance ~~outstanding.~~outstanding at March 31, 2019. For additional information, see the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.

To assist in our funds acquisition and interest rate risk management efforts, management utilizes the national brokered deposit market and maintained a balance at March 31, ~~2018~~2019, of ~~$75.5~~$123.4 million of brokered certificates of deposit. In contrast to most retail certificate of deposit offerings which provide the depositor with an option to withdraw their funds prior to maturity, subject to an early withdrawal penalty, many of our certificates of deposit acquired in the brokered market limits the depositor ability to withdraw the funds before the end of the term (except in the case of death or adjudication of incompetence of a depositor) which greatly reduces early redemption risk associated with retail deposits. This strategy may include, but is not necessarily limited to, raising longer term deposits (with terms greater than three years) that assist the Bank in its interest rate risk management efforts. At March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, brokered certificates of deposit had a remaining maturity of 4up to ~~34 months. Most~~4.5 years. Some of these certificates also provide the Bank the option to redeem the deposit after six months, a favorable distinction compared to retail certificate of deposit terms that are offered in our local market. With these redemption limitations and call features, the cost of these brokered deposits is generally higher than our retail certificate of deposit offerings. Consequently, as we increase our brokered deposits, our cost of funds may increase.

First Financial Northwest is a separate legal entity from the Bank and, on a stand-alone level, must provide for its own liquidity and pay its own operating expenses and cash dividends. First Financial Northwest's primary sources of funds consist of dividends from the Bank, although there are regulatory requirements related to the ability of the Bank to pay dividends. At March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, the Company (on an unconsolidated basis) had liquid assets of ~~$17.1~~$18.3 million and short-term liabilities of ~~$145,000.~~$205,000.

On a monthly basis, we estimate our liquidity sources and needs for the next six months. Also, we determine funding concentrations and our need for sources of funds other than deposits. This information is used by our Asset/Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”) in forecasting funding needs and investing opportunities. We believe that our current liquidity position and our expected operating results are sufficient to fund all of our existing commitments.

Commitments and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We are a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of our customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and the unused portions of lines of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated financial statements. Commitments to extend credit and lines of credit are not recorded as an asset or liability by us until the instrument is exercised. At March 31, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, we had no commitments to originate loans for sale.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the loan agreement. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. We evaluate each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of the collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by us upon the extension of credit, is based on our credit evaluation of the

customer. The amount and type of collateral required varies, but may include real estate and income-producing commercial properties.

The following table summarizes our outstanding commitments to advance additional amounts pursuant to outstanding lines of credit and to disburse funds related to our construction loans at March 31, ~~2018:~~2019:


			Amount of Commitment Expiration										Amount of Commitment Expiration
	Total Amounts Committed		Through One Year		After One Through Three Years		After Three Through Five Years		After Five Years		Total Amounts Committed		Through One Year		After One Through Three Years		After Three Through Five Years		After Five Years
	(In thousands)										(In thousands)
Commitments to originate loans	$	960	$	960	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	4,545	$	4,315	$	230	$	—	$	—
Unused portion of lines of credit ��	30,506		4,600		12,089		2,442		11,375
Unused portion of lines of credit											36,588		10,390		7,660		2,364		16,174
Undisbursed portion of construction loans	85,576		49,809		35,767		—		—		86,794		48,202		38,592		—		—
Total commitments	$	117,042	$	55,369	$	47,856	$	2,442	$	11,375	$	127,927	$	62,907	$	46,482	$	2,364	$	16,174

We anticipate that we will continue to have sufficient funds and alternative funding sources to meet our current commitments.

As of March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, the Bank had ~~eight~~ten operating leases with remaining terms of 2917 months to ~~seven~~6 years which carry minimum lease payments of ~~$39,000~~$51,000 per month. All ~~eight~~ten leases offer extension ~~periods. During~~periods, and include a new leased branch in Kent, Washington, which opened in the first quarter of ~~2018, the Bank moved the branch offices in Lake Stevens and Smokey Point, Washington to~~2019, as well as a new ~~leased facilities in those communities, replacing the assumed leases from our 2017 Branch Acquisition. A new~~lease secured for a branch office expected to open later in ~~Bothell, Washington officially opened~~2019 in ~~April 2018.~~Kirkland, Washington.

First Financial Northwest and its subsidiaries from time to time are involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. There are currently no matters that in the opinion of management would have a material adverse effect on First Financial Northwest’s consolidated financial position, results of operation, or liquidity.

Capital

At March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, stockholders’ equity totaled ~~$148.8~~$151.7 million, or ~~12.1%~~11.8% of total assets. Our book value per share of common stock was ~~$13.80~~$14.50 at March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, compared to ~~$13.27~~$14.35 at December 31, ~~2017.~~2018. Consistent with our goal to operate a sound and profitable financial organization, we actively seek to maintain a “well-capitalized” status in accordance with regulatory standards.

As of March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, the Bank ~~and consolidated Company~~ exceeded all regulatory capital requirements and ~~the Bank~~ was considered “well capitalized” under regulatory capital guidelines of the FDIC. Effective September 30, 2018, the Bank is no longer required to file consolidated capital ratios as part of the Federal Reserve Bank’s regulatory filings. The following table provides ~~our~~the Bank’s capital requirements and actual results.

At March 31, 2018
Actual For Minimum Capital Adequacy Purposes To be Categorized as “Well Capitalized”
Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio
(Dollars in thousands)
Tier I leverage capital (to average assets)
Bank only $ 126,836
10.44 % $ 48,603
4.00 % $ 60,753
5.00 %
Consolidated 148,206
12.18
48,687
4.00
60,859
5.00
Common equity tier I ("CET1") (to risk-weighted assets)
Bank only 126,836
13.13
43,469
4.50
62,789
6.50
Consolidated 148,206
15.31
43,552
4.50
62,909
6.50
Tier I risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Bank only 126,836
13.13
57,959
6.00
77,278
8.00
Consolidated 148,206
15.31
58,070
6.00
77,426
8.00
Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Bank only 138,929
14.38
77,278
8.00
96,598
10.00
Consolidated 160,322
16.57
77,426
8.00
96,783
10.00



	At March 31, 2019
	Actual				For Minimum Capital Adequacy Purposes				To be Categorized as “Well Capitalized”
	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
	(Dollars in thousands)
Tier I leverage capital (to average assets)	$	129,415	10.28	%	$	50,344	4.00	%	$	62,930	5.00	%
Common equity tier I ("CET1") (to risk-weighted assets)	129,415		13.13		44,352		4.50		64,064		6.50
Tier I risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)	129,415		13.13		59,136		6.00		78,848		8.00
Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)	141,759		14.38		78,848		8.00		98,560		10.00

In addition to the minimum CET1, Tier 1I total capital and leverage ratios, the Bank is required to maintain a capital conservation buffer consisting of additional CET1 capital greater than 2.5% of risk-weighted assets above the required minimum levels in order to avoid limitations on paying dividends, engaging in share repurchases, and paying discretionary bonuses based on percentages of eligible retained income that could be utilized for such actions. ~~This new~~At March 31, 2019, the Bank’s capital conservation buffer requirement began to be phased in starting in January 2016 at 0.625% of risk-weighted assets and will increase each year until fully implemented to an amount equal to 2.5% of risk-weighted assets in January 2019. As of March 31, 2018, the conservation buffer was ~~1.25% and First Financial Northwest’s and the Bank’s conservation buffer was 8.57% and~~ 6.38%~~, respectively.~~.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

General. Our Board of Directors has approved an asset/liability management policy to guide management in maximizing ~~net~~ interest ~~income~~rate spread by managing the differences in terms between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities while maintaining acceptable levels of liquidity, capital adequacy, interest rate ~~sensitivity,~~risk, credit risk, and profitability. The policy established an Investment, Asset/Liability Committee (“ALCO,”) comprised of certain members of senior management and the Board of Directors. The Committee’s purpose is to ~~manage,~~communicate, coordinate and ~~communicate~~manage our asset/liability position consistent with our business plan and Board-approved ~~policy.~~policies. The ALCO meets quarterly to review various areas including:

economic conditions;

interest rate outlook;

asset/liability mix;

interest rate risk sensitivity;

current market opportunities to promote specific products;

historical financial results;

projected financial results; and

capital position.

~~Additionally, the~~The Committee also reviews current and projected liquidity needs. As part of its procedures, the ~~ALCO~~Committee regularly reviews ~~our~~ interest rate risk by ~~modeling~~forecasting the impact that changes in interest rates may have on ~~earnings, particularly~~ net interest ~~income. The~~income and the market value of portfolio equity, which is defined as the net present value of an institution’s existing assets, ~~less its~~ liabilities and

off-balance sheet instruments ~~is also modeled under several scenarios of changing interest rates. In both cases, results are evaluated~~ and ~~compared with~~evaluating such impacts against the maximum potential change in the market value of portfolio equity that is authorized by the Board of Directors.

Our Risk When Interest Rates Change. The rates of interest we earn on assets and pay on liabilities generally are established contractually for a period of time. Market interest rates change over time. Our loans generally have longer maturities than our deposits. Accordingly, our results of operations, like those of other financial institutions, are impacted by changes in interest rates and the interest rate sensitivity of our assets and liabilities. The risk associated with changes in interest rates and our ability to adapt to these changes is known as interest rate risk and is our most significant market risk.

We have utilized the following strategies in our efforts to manage interest rate risk:

•we are originating shorter term higher yielding loans, whenever possible;

we have attempted, where possible, to extend the maturities of our deposits which typically fund our long-term assets;

•we have invested in securities with relatively short average lives, generally less than eight years;

•we have added adjustable-rate loans to our loan portfolio;

•we utilize brokered certificates of deposit with a call option as a funding source; and

•we have utilized an interest rate swap to effectively fix the rate on $50.0 million of FHLB advances.

We have evaluated the use of derivative instruments to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings, prepayment penalties and cash flows and to lower our cost of borrowing while taking into account variable interest rate risk. On October 25, 2016, the Bank entered into a Cash Flow Hedge agreement to effectively fix the rate for five years on $50.0 million of short-term FHLB advances. We are using this interest rate swap as a tool to lower the cost of certain FHLB advances as compared to the fixed rates offered by the FHLB for its longer term advances. At March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, pursuant to the Cash Flow Hedge agreement we held a $50.0 million notional pay fixed, receive floating cash flow hedge. The Bank pays a fixed rate of 1.34% for five years and in turn, ~~will receive~~receives an interest payment based on three-month LIBOR, which resets quarterly. The hedge instrument is a $50.0 million FHLB fixed-rate three-month advance that is renewed at the fixed rate at ~~that time.~~maturity. Entering into this hedge agreement has allowed the Bank to secure fixed rate funding at a lower cost than a traditional five-year fixed rate FHLB advance. We will continue to review similar instruments and may utilize them for interest rate risk management in the future.

Interest rate contracts, however, may expose us to the risk of loss associated with variations in the spread between the interest rate contract and the hedged item. In addition, these contracts carry volatility risk that the expected uncertainty relating to the price of the underlying asset differs from what is anticipated. If any interest rate swaps we enter into prove ineffective, it could

result in volatility in our operating results, including potential losses, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows.

Brokered Deposits. Management utilizes the national brokered deposit market as an additional source of funds and to assist efforts in managing interest rate risk. Utilizing brokered deposits might result in increased regulatory scrutiny, as such deposits are not viewed as favorably as core retail deposits and there can be no assurance that the Bank will be allowed to include brokered deposits in its deposit mix in the future. While management will attempt to weigh the benefits of brokered deposits against the costs and risks, there can be no assurance that its conclusions will necessarily be aligned with those of the Bank’s regulators.

How We Measure the Risk of Interest Rate Changes. We monitor our interest rate sensitivity on a quarterly basis ~~to measure~~by measuring the ~~change in~~impact of changes to net interest income in ~~varying~~multiple rate environments. Management retains the services of a third party consultant with over 30 years of experience in asset-liability management to assist in its interest rate risk and asset-liability management. Management uses various assumptions to evaluate the sensitivity of the market value of our ~~operations~~assets and liabilities to changes in interest rates. Although management believes these assumptions are reasonable, the interest rate sensitivity of our assets and liabilities on net interest income and the market value of portfolio equity could vary substantially if different assumptions were used or actual ~~experience differs~~results differ from these assumptions. Although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods of repricing, they may react differently to changes in market interest rates. The interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types of assets and liabilities lag behind changes in market interest rates. Non-uniform changes and fluctuations in market interest rates across various maturities will also affect the results presented. In addition, certain assets, such as adjustable-rate mortgage loans, have features which restrict changes in interest rates on a short-term basis and over the life of the asset. AFurther, a portion of our adjustable-rate loans have interest rate floors below which the loan’s contractual interest rate may not adjust. Approximately ~~50.2%~~53.8% of our total loans, net of LIP, were adjustable-rate loans at March 31, ~~2018.~~2019. At that date, ~~$200.7~~$259.9 million, or ~~39.7%~~45.3% of these loans were at their floor, with a weighted-average interest rate of ~~4.17%~~4.46%.

The inability of our loans to adjust downward can contribute to increased income in periods of declining interest rates. However, when loans are at their floors, there is a further risk that our interest income may not increase as rapidly as our cost of funds during periods of increasing interest rates. ~~Furthermore,~~Further, in the event of a significant change in interest rates, prepayment and early withdrawal levels would likely deviate from those assumed. Finally, the ability of many borrowers to service their debt may decrease in the event of an interest rate increase. We consider all these factors in monitoring our interest rate exposure.

The assumptions we use are based upon a combination of proprietary and market data that reflect historical results and current market conditions. These assumptions relate to interest rates, loan prepayments, deposit decay rates and the market value of certain assets under the various interest rate scenarios. We use market data to determine prepayments and maturities of loans, investments and borrowings and use our own assumptions on deposit decay ~~rates. The exception to this is~~rates except for time deposits. Time deposits ~~which~~ are modeled to reprice to market rates upon their stated maturities. We also assume that non-maturity ~~deposits~~deposit rates can be maintained with rate adjustments ~~not directly~~ proportionate to the change in market interest rates, based upon our historical deposit decay rates, which are substantially lower than market decay rates. We have ~~demonstrated~~observed in the past that ~~the tiering structure of~~ our deposit accounts during changing rate environments ~~results in~~have relatively lower volatility and less than market rate changes in our interest expense for deposits. We tier our deposit accounts by balance and rate, whereby higher balances within an account earn higher rates of interest. Therefore, deposits that are not very rate sensitive (generally, lower balance tiers) are separated from deposits that are rate sensitive (generally, higher balance tiers).changes. When interest rates rise, we do not have to raise interest rates proportionately on less rate sensitive accounts to retain these deposits. These assumptions are based upon our analysis of our customer base, competitive factors and historical experience.

Our income simulation model examines changes in net interest income in which interest rates were assumed to remain at their base level, instantaneously increase by 100, 200 and 300 basis points or decline immediately by 100 and 200 basis points. ~~Reductions of rates~~A decline by ~~200 and~~ 300 basis points were not reported ~~due to~~as the current ~~low~~targeted federal funds rate ~~environment.~~is between 2.25% and 2.50%.

The following table illustrates the estimated change in our net interest income atover the next 12 months from March 31, ~~2018~~2019, that would occur in the event of an ~~instantaneous~~immediate change in interest rates equally across all maturities, with no effect given to any steps that we might take to counter the effect of that interest rate movement.


Net Interest Income Change at March 31, 2018
Net Interest Income Change at March 31, 2019					Net Interest Income Change at March 31, 2019
Basis Point Change in Rates	Net Interest Income		% Change			Net Interest Income		% Change
(Dollars in thousands)
+300	$	37,257	(4.50	)%		$	37,311	(0.78	)%
+200	37,842		(3.00	)		37,425		(0.48	)
+100	38,497		(1.33	)		37,613		0.02
Base	39,014		—			37,606		—
(100)	38,495		(1.33	)		38,270		1.77
(200)						38,164		1.48

The following table illustrates the change in our net portfolio value (“NPV”) at March 31, ~~2018~~2019, that would occur in the event of an immediate change in interest rates equally across all maturities, with no effect given to any steps that we might take to counter the effect of that interest rate movement.


Basis Point								Net Portfolio as % of				Market									Net Portfolio as % of				Market
Change in	Net Portfolio Value⁽¹⁾							Portfolio Value of Assets				Value of		Net Portfolio Value⁽¹⁾							Portfolio Value of Assets				Value of
Rates	Amount		$ Change ⁽²⁾			% Change		NPV Ratio ⁽³⁾		% Change ⁽⁴⁾		Assets ⁽⁵⁾		Amount		$ Change ⁽²⁾			% Change		NPV Ratio ⁽³⁾		% Change ⁽⁴⁾		Assets ⁽⁵⁾
	(Dollars in thousands)													(Dollars in thousands)
+300	$	127,416	$	(39,570	)	(23.70	)%	11.27	%	(3.26	)%	$	1,130,379	$	125,020	$	(34,567	)	(21.66	)%	10.45	%	(2.69	)%	$	1,196,933
+200	139,970		(27,016		)	(16.18	)	12.09		(2.22	)	1,157,260		136,453		(23,134		)	(14.50	)	11.14		(1.80	)	1,225,328
+100	154,538		(12,448		)	(7.45	)	13.02		(1.02	)	1,186,939		149,570		(10,017		)	(6.28	)	11.91		(0.78	)	1,256,072
Base	166,986		—			—		13.74		—		1,215,244		159,587		—			—		12.42		—		1,284,526
(100)	172,429		5,443			3.26		13.89		0.45		1,240,976		165,898		6,311			3.95		12.67		0.49		1,309,012
(200)														163,790		4,203			2.63		12.31		0.33		1,330,354

_____________

⁽¹⁾ The net portfolio value is the difference between the present value of the discounted cash flows of assets and liabilities and represents the market value of the Company’s equity for any given interest rate scenario. Net portfolio value is useful for determining, on a market value basis, how the market value of equity changes in response to various interest rate scenarios. Large changes in net portfolio value reflect increased interest rate sensitivity and generally more volatile earnings streams.

⁽²⁾ The increase or decrease in net portfolio value at the indicated interest rates compared to the net portfolio value assuming no change in interest rates.

⁽³⁾ Net portfolio value divided by the market value of assets.

⁽⁴⁾ The increase or decrease in the net portfolio value divided by the market value of assets.

⁽⁵⁾ The market value of assets represents the value of assets under the various interest rate scenarios and reflects the sensitivity of those assets to interest rate changes.

The net interest income and net portfolio value tables presented above are predicated upon a stable balance sheet with no growth or change in asset or liability mix. In addition, the net portfolio value is based upon the present value of discounted cash flows using our estimates of current replacement rates to discount the cash flows. The effects of changes in interest rates in the net interest income table are based upon a cash flow simulation of our existing assets and liabilities and assuming that delinquency rates would not change as a result of changes in interest rates, although there can be no assurance that this will be the case. Delinquency rates may change when interest rates change as a result of changes in the loan portfolio mix, underwriting conditions, loan terms or changes in economic conditions that have a delayed effect on the portfolio. Even if interest rates change in the designated amounts, there can be no assurance that our assets and liabilities would perform as set forth above. Also, a change in U.S. Treasury rates in the designated amounts accompanied by a change in the shape of the Treasury yield curve would cause changes to the net portfolio value and net interest income other than those indicated above.

At March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, other than the interest rate swap we entered into through the Cash Flow Hedge agreement, we did not have any derivative financial instruments or trading accounts for any class of financial instruments, nor have we engaged in any other hedging activities or purchased off-balance sheet derivative instruments. However, we continue to review such instruments

and may utilize them for interest rate risk management in the future. Interest rate risk continues to be one of our primary risks, as other types of risks, such as foreign currency exchange risk and commodity pricing risk do not arise in the normal course of our business activities and operations.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

The management of First Financial Northwest, Inc. is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”). A control procedure, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that its objectives are met. Also, because of the inherent limitations in all control procedures, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. Additionally, in designing disclosure controls and procedures, our management was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures is also based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. As a result of these inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Furthermore, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

(a)

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures: An evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act) was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) and several other members of our senior management as of the end of the period covered by this report. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (i) accumulated and communicated to our management (including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) in a timely manner and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.


(b)	Changes in Internal Controls: In the quarter ended March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we are engaged in various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business, none of which are currently considered to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in Part I, Item 1A of our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(a) Not applicable

(b) Not applicable

(c) ~~Not applicable~~The following table summarizes First Financial Northwest’s common stock repurchases during the three months ended March 31, 2019, under the repurchase plan effective November 5, 2018 through May 3, 2019:



Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Repurchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plan	Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Repurchased Under the Plan
January 1 - January 31, 2019	124,900	$	15.68	124,900	221,200
February 1 - February 28, 2019	71,300	15.78		71,300	149,900
March 1 - March 31, 2019	67,600	15.90		67,600	82,300
	263,800	15.76		263,800	82,300

On October 25, 2018, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 550,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, or 5% of the Company’s outstanding shares. The plan allows for the repurchase from November 5, 2018 through May 3, 2019, under a pre-arranged stock trading plan in accordance with guidelines specified under Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Repurchases under the Company’s Rule 10b5-1 plan are administered through an independent broker subject to SEC requirements as well as a certain price, market volume, and timing constraints as specified in the plan. At March 31, 2019, the Company had repurchased a total of 467,700 shares since the onset of the plan on November 5, 2018, at an average price of $15.62 per share.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

Not applicable.

5453

Item 6. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a) Exhibits



3.1			Articles of Incorporation of First Financial Northwest ⁽¹⁾
3.2			Amended and Restated Bylaws of First Financial Northwest ⁽²⁾
4.0			Form of stock certificate of First Financial Northwest⁽¹⁾
10.1			Amended Employment Agreement between First Savings Bank Northwest and Joseph W. Kiley III ⁽³⁾
10.2			Form of Change in Control Severance Agreement for Executive Officers ⁽⁴⁾
10.3			Amended Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan Participation Agreement with Joseph W. Kiley III⁽⁵⁾
10.4			2008 Equity Incentive Plan ⁽⁶⁾
10.5			2016 Equity Incentive Plan ⁽⁷⁾
10.6			Forms of incentive and non-qualified stock option award agreements under the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan ⁽⁸⁾
10.7			Form of restricted stock award agreement under the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan ⁽⁸⁾
10.8			Employment Agreement between First Savings Bank Northwest and Richard P. Jacobson ⁽³⁾
10.9			~~Separation Agreement and General Release between First Financial Northwest Bank and Gregg DeRitis and dated August 31, 2017~~Form of restricted stock award agreement under the 2016 Equity Incentive Plan⁽⁹⁾
10.10			Form of incentive stock option award agreement under the 2016 Equity Incentive Plan⁽¹⁰⁾
10.11			Form of non-qualified stock option award agreement under the 2016 Equity Incentive Plan⁽¹⁰⁾
10.12			Form of restricted stock award agreement under the 2016 Equity Incentive Plan⁽¹¹⁾
10.13			Offer letter for Randy T. Riffle⁽¹²⁾
10.14			Form of Involuntary Termination Agreement with Randy T. Riffle⁽¹³⁾
10.15			Form of Change in Control Severance Agreement with Randy T. Riffle⁽¹³⁾
31.1			Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
31.2			Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
32			Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
101			The following materials from First Financial Northwest’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (1) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (2) Consolidated Income Statements; (3) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income; (4) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity; (5) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (6) Selected Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

_____________


⁽¹⁾	Filed as an exhibit to First Financial Northwest’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 on June 6, 2007 (333-143539)


⁽²⁾	Filed as an exhibit to First Financial Northwest’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated ~~June 15, 2017.~~April 3, 2019.


⁽³⁾	Filed as an exhibit to First Financial Northwest’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 5, 2013.


⁽⁴⁾	Filed as an exhibit to First Financial Northwest’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 9, 2014.


⁽⁵⁾	Filed as an exhibit to First Financial Northwest’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 11, 2017.


⁽⁶⁾	Filed as Appendix A to First Financial Northwest’s definitive proxy statement dated April 15, 2008.


⁽⁷⁾	Filed as an exhibit to First Financial Northwest’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 15, 2016.


⁽⁸⁾	Filed as an exhibit to First Financial Northwest’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 1, 2008.


⁽⁹⁾	Filed as an exhibit to First Financial Northwest’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for March 31, 2018 filed on May 8, 2018.


⁽¹⁰⁾	Filed as an exhibit to First Financial Northwest’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 on June 15, 2016 (333-212029)


⁽¹¹⁾	Filed as an exhibit to First Financial Northwest’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for September 30, 2018 filed November 7, 2018.


⁽¹²⁾	Filed as an exhibit to First Financial Northwest’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated ~~September 8, 2017.~~December 20, 2018.


⁽¹³⁾	Filed as an exhibit to First Financial Northwest’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 3, 2019.

5554

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



	FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC.

Date: May ~~8, 2018~~9, 2019	By:	/s/Joseph W. Kiley III
		Joseph W. Kiley III
		President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)



Date: May ~~8, 2018~~9, 2019	By:	/s/Richard P. Jacobson
		Richard P. Jacobson
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

Date: May ~~8, 2018~~9, 2019	By:	/s/Christine A. Huestis
		Christine A. Huestis
		Vice President and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)

5655

Exhibit Index



Exhibit No.			Description
~~10.10~~			~~Form of restricted stock award agreement under the 2016 Equity Incentive Plan~~
31.1			Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
31.2			Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
32			Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
101			The following materials from First Financial Northwest’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (1) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (2) Consolidated Income Statements; (3) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income; (4) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity; (5) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (6) Selected Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

5756



	Balance Sheet Location	Amount Recognized in OCI at March 31, 2018		Amount Recognized in OCI at December 31, 2017
	(In thousands)
Interest rate swap on FHLB debt designated as cash flow hedge	Other assets	$	524	$	125



	Unaudited Pro Forma
	Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
	(In thousands except share data)
Total revenues (net interest income plus noninterest income)	$	9,293
Net income	1,970
Earnings per share - basic	0.19
Earnings per share - diluted	0.19



	County								Total OREO		Number of Properties	Percent of Total OREO
	King		Pierce		Kitsap		Mason		Total OREO		Number of Properties	Percent of Total OREO
	(Dollars in thousands)
OREO:
Commercial real estate ⁽¹⁾	—		$	483	$	—	$	—	$	483	2	100.0	%
Total OREO	$	—	$	483	$	—	$	—	$	483	2	100.0	%