PART I

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION


	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
	June 30,			December 31,			June 30,			September 30,			December 31,			September 30,
(In thousands)	2009			2008			2008			2009			2008			2008

Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	122,382		$	219,794		$	166,857		$	128,898		$	219,794		$	158,201
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements		41,450			226,110			73,311			22,863			226,110			35,181
Interest bearing deposits with banks		655,759			123,009			6,438			1,168,362			123,009			4,686
Available-for-sale securities, at fair value		1,267,410			784,673			1,590,648			1,434,248			784,673			1,469,500
Trading account securities		22,973			4,399			1,877			29,204			4,399			2,243
Brokerage customer receivables		17,701			17,901			19,661			19,441			17,901			19,436
Loans held-for-sale, at fair value		291,275			51,029			114,739			187,505			51,029			63,570
Loans held-for-sale, at lower of cost or market		529,825			10,087			3,640			5,750			10,087			4,828
Loans, net of unearned income		7,595,476			7,621,069			7,153,603			8,275,257			7,621,069			7,322,545
Less: Allowance for loan losses		85,113			69,767			57,633			95,096			69,767			66,327

Net loans		7,510,363			7,551,302			7,095,970			8,180,161			7,551,302			7,256,218
Premises and equipment, net		350,447			349,875			348,881			352,890			349,875			349,388
Accrued interest receivable and other assets		260,182			240,664			208,574			315,806			240,664			209,970
Trade date securities receivable		—			788,565			—			—			788,565			—
Goodwill		276,525			276,310			276,311			276,525			276,310			276,310
Other intangible assets		13,244			14,608			16,170			14,368			14,608			15,389

Total assets	$	11,359,536		$	10,658,326		$	9,923,077		$	12,136,021		$	10,658,326		$	9,864,920

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Deposits:
Non-interest bearing	$	793,173		$	757,844		$	688,512		$	841,668		$	757,844		$	717,587
Interest bearing		8,398,159			7,618,906			7,072,855			9,005,495			7,618,906			7,111,940

Total deposits		9,191,332			8,376,750			7,761,367			9,847,163			8,376,750			7,829,527

Notes payable		1,000			1,000			41,975			1,000			1,000			42,025
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		435,980			435,981			438,983			433,983			435,981			438,983
Other borrowings		244,286			336,764			383,009			252,071			336,764			296,391
Subordinated notes		65,000			70,000			75,000			65,000			70,000			75,000
Junior subordinated debentures		249,493			249,515			249,579			249,493			249,515			249,537
Trade date securities payable		—			—			97,898			—			—			2,000
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities		107,369			121,744			126,241			181,229			121,744			122,126

Total liabilities		10,294,460			9,591,754			9,174,052			11,029,939			9,591,754			9,055,589


Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred stock		283,518			281,873			—
Common stock		26,835			26,611			26,478
Preferred stock, no par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized:
Series A — $1,000 liquidation value; 50,000 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2009, December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008											49,379			49,379			49,379
Series B — $1,000 liquidation value; 250,000 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008; no shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2008											234,682			232,494			—
Common stock, no par value; $1.00 stated value; 60,000,000 shares authorized; 26,965,411, 26,610,714 and 26,547,839 shares issued at September 30, 2009, December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008, respectively											26,965			26,611			26,548
Surplus		577,473			571,887			547,792			580,988			571,887			551,453
Treasury stock		(122,302	)		(122,290	)		(122,258	)
Treasury stock, at cost, 2,862,343 at September 30, 2009 and 2,854,040 shares at December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008											(122,437	)		(122,290	)		(122,290	)
Retained earnings		317,713			318,793			325,314			342,873			318,793			318,066
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(18,161	)		(10,302	)		(28,301	)		(6,368	)		(10,302	)		(13,825	)

Total shareholders’ equity		1,065,076			1,066,572			749,025			1,106,082			1,066,572			809,331

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	11,359,536		$	10,658,326		$	9,923,077		$	12,136,021		$	10,658,326		$	9,864,920

WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)


	Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	June 30,					June 30,						September 30,						September 30,
(In thousands, except per share data)	2009		2008			2009			2008			2009			2008			2009			2008

Interest income
Interest and fees on loans	$	110,302	$	108,803		$	217,189		$	227,756		$	126,448		$	108,495		$	343,637		$	336,251
Interest bearing deposits with banks		767		68			1,427			188			778			27			2,205			215
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements		66		472			127			1,106			106			197			233			1,303
Securities		15,819		16,553			30,146			32,634			14,106			17,599			44,252			50,233
Trading account securities		55		15			79			46			7			23			86			69
Brokerage customer receivables		120		249			240			606			132			228			372			834

Total interest income		127,129		126,160			249,208			262,336			141,577			126,569			390,785			388,905

Interest expense
Interest on deposits		43,502		53,862			89,455			115,292			42,806			53,405			132,261			168,697
Interest on Federal Home Loan Bank advances		4,503		4,557			8,956			9,113			4,536			4,583			13,492			13,696
Interest on notes payable and other borrowings		1,752		2,900			3,622			5,670			1,779			2,661			5,401			8,331
Interest on subordinated notes		428		843			1,008			1,930			333			786			1,341			2,716
Interest on junior subordinated debentures		4,447		4,598			8,888			9,189			4,460			4,454			13,348			13,643

Total interest expense		54,632		66,760			111,929			141,194			53,914			65,889			165,843			207,083

Net interest income		72,497		59,400			137,279			121,142			87,663			60,680			224,942			181,822
Provision for credit losses		23,663		10,301			38,136			18,856			91,193			24,129			129,329			42,985

Net interest income after provision for credit losses		48,834		49,099			99,143			102,286			(3,530	)		36,551			95,613			138,837

Non-interest income
Wealth management		6,883		7,771			12,809			15,636			7,501			7,044			20,310			22,680
Mortgage banking		22,596		7,536			38,828			13,632			13,204			4,488			52,032			18,120
Service charges on deposit accounts		3,183		2,565			6,153			4,938			3,447			2,674			9,600			7,612
Gain on sales of premium finance receivables		196		566			518			1,707			3,629			456			4,147			2,163
Gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net		1,540		(140	)		(498	)		(1,473	)
(Losses) gains on available-for-sale securities, net													(412	)		920			(910	)		(553	)
Gain on bargain purchase													113,062			—			113,062			—
Other		11,054		15,306			24,069			23,736			10,249			6,548			34,318			30,283

Total non-interest income		45,452		33,604			81,879			58,176			150,680			22,130			232,559			80,305

Non-interest expense
Salaries and employee benefits		46,015		36,976			90,835			73,648			48,088			35,823			138,923			109,471
Equipment		4,015		4,048			7,953			7,974			4,069			4,050			12,022			12,025
Occupancy, net		5,608		5,438			11,798			11,305			5,884			5,666			17,682			16,971
Data processing		3,216		2,918			6,352			5,716			3,226			2,850			9,578			8,566
Advertising and marketing		1,420		1,368			2,515			2,367			1,488			1,343			4,003			3,709
Professional fees		2,871		2,227			5,754			4,295			4,089			2,195			9,843			6,490
Amortization of other intangible assets		676		779			1,363			1,567			677			781			2,040			2,348
Other		20,424		11,427			34,637			21,158			25,042			10,491			59,679			31,648

Total non-interest expense		84,245		65,181			161,207			128,030			92,563			63,199			253,770			191,228

Income before taxes		10,041		17,522			19,815			32,432
Income tax expense		3,492		6,246			6,908			11,451
Income (loss) before taxes													54,587			(4,518	)		74,402			27,914
Income tax expense (benefit)													22,592			(2,070	)		29,500			9,381

Net income		6,549		11,276			12,907			20,981
Net income (loss)													31,995			(2,448	)		44,902			18,533
Preferred stock dividends and discount accretion		5,000		—			10,000			—			4,668			544			14,668			544


Net income applicable to common shares	$	1,549	$	11,276		$	2,907		$	20,981
Net income (loss) applicable to common shares												$	27,327		$	(2,992	)	$	30,234		$	17,989


Net income per common share — Basic	$	0.06	$	0.48		$	0.12		$	0.89
Net income (loss) per common share — Basic												$	1.14		$	(0.13	)	$	1.26		$	0.76


Net income per common share — Diluted	$	0.06	$	0.47		$	0.12		$	0.87
Net income (loss) per common share — Diluted												$	1.07		$	(0.13	)	$	1.25		$	0.75


Cash dividends declared per common share	$	—	$	—		$	0.18		$	0.18		$	0.09		$	0.18		$	0.27		$	0.36

Weighted average common shares outstanding		23,964		23,608			23,910			23,563			24,052			23,644			23,958			23,590
Dilutive potential common shares		300		531			269			555			2,493			—			323			525

Average common shares and dilutive common shares		24,264		24,139			24,179			24,118			26,545			23,644			24,281			24,115

WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (UNAUDITED)


														Accumulated																			Accumulated
														Other			Total																Other			Total
	Preferred		Common					Treasury			Retained			Comprehensive			Shareholders’			Preferred		Common					Treasury			Retained			Comprehensive			Shareholders’
(In thousands)	Stock		Stock		Surplus			Stock			Earnings			Income (Loss)			Equity			Stock		Stock		Surplus			Stock			Earnings			Income (Loss)			Equity

Balance at December 31, 2007	$	—	$	26,281	$	539,586		$	(122,196	)	$	309,556		$	(13,672	)	$	739,555		$	—	$	26,281	$	539,586		$	(122,196	)	$	309,556		$	(13,672	)	$	739,555

Comprehensive income:
Net income		—		—		—			—			20,981			—			20,981			—		—		—			—			18,533			—			18,533
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Unrealized losses on securities, net of reclassification adjustment		—		—		—			—			—			(15,188	)		(15,188	)		—		—		—			—			—			(212	)		(212	)
Unrealized gains on derivative Instruments		—		—		—			—			—			559			559			—		—		—			—			—			59			59

Comprehensive income												—						6,352																			18,380

Cash dividends declared on common stock		—		—		—			—			(4,231	)		—			(4,231	)		—		—		—			—			(8,487	)		—			(8,487	)
Dividends on preferred stock																					—		—		—			—			(544	)		—			(544	)
Common stock repurchases		—		—		—			(62	)		—			—			(62	)		—		—		—			(94	)		—			—			(94	)
Stock-based compensation		—		—		4,942			—			—			—			4,942			—		—		7,612			—			—			—			7,612
Cumulative effect of change in accounting for split-dollar life insurance		—		—		—			—			(992	)					(992	)		—		—		—			—			(992	)		—			(992	)
Issuance of preferred stock, net of issuance costs																					49,379		—		—			—			—			—			49,379
Common stock issued for:		—
Exercise of stock options and warrants		—		73		1,871			—			—			—			1,944			—		130		2,959			—			—			—			3,089
Restricted stock awards		—		71		(532	)		—			—			—			(461	)		—		84		(629	)		—			—			—			(545	)
Employee stock purchase plan		—		23		795			—			—			—			818			—		23		795			—			—			—			818
Director compensation plan				30		1,130			—			—			—			1,160			—		30		1,130			—			—			—			1,160

Balance at June 30, 2008	$	—	$	26,478	$	547,792		$	(122,258	)	$	325,314		$	(28,301	)	$	749,025
Balance at September 30, 2008																				$	49,379	$	26,548	$	551,453		$	(122,290	)	$	318,066		$	(13,825	)	$	809,331


Balance at December 31, 2008	$	281,873	$	26,611	$	571,887		$	(122,290	)	$	318,793		$	(10,302	)	$	1,066,572		$	281,873	$	26,611	$	571,887		$	(122,290	)	$	318,793		$	(10,302	)	$	1,066,572

Comprehensive income:
Net income		—		—		—			—			12,907			—			12,907			—		—		—			—			44,902			—			44,902
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Unrealized losses on securities, net of reclassification adjustment		—		—		—			—			—			(10,666	)		(10,666	)
Unrealized gains on securities, net of reclassification adjustment																					—		—		—			—			—			2,154			2,154
Unrealized gains on derivative instruments		—		—		—			—			—			2,807			2,807			—		—		—			—			—			2,089			2,089

Comprehensive income																		5,048																			49,145

Cash dividends declared on common stock		—		—		—			—			(4,296	)		—			(4,296	)		—		—		—			—			(6,463	)		—			(6,463	)
Dividends on preferred stock		—		—		—			—			(8,355	)		—			(8,355	)		—		—		—			—			(12,480	)		—			(12,480	)
Accretion on preferred stock		1,645		—		—			—			(1,645	)		—			—			2,188		—		—			—			(2,188	)		—			—
Common stock repurchases		—		—		—			(12	)		—			—			(12	)		—		—		—			(147	)		—			—			(147	)
Stock-based compensation		—		—		3,431			—			—			—			3,431			—		—		5,132			—			—			—			5,132
Cumulative effect of change in accounting for other-than-temporary impairment		—		—		—			—			309			—			309			—		—		—			—			309			(309	)		—
Common stock issued for:
Exercise of stock options and warrants		—		52		612			—			—			—			664			—		175		2,482			—			—			—			2,657
Restricted stock awards		—		66		(764	)		—			—			—			(698	)		—		73		(820	)		—			—			—			(747	)
Employee stock purchase plan		—		56		635			—			—			—			691			—		56		635			—			—			—			691
Director compensation plan		—		50		1,672			—			—			—			1,722			—		50		1,672			—			—			—			1,722

Balance at June 30, 2009	$	283,518	$	26,835	$	577,473		$	(122,302	)	$	317,713		$	(18,161	)	$	1,065,076
Balance at September 30, 2009																				$	284,061	$	26,965	$	580,988		$	(122,437	)	$	342,873		$	(6,368	)	$	1,106,082

WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)


	Six Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	June 30,						September 30,
(In thousands)	2009			2008			2009			2008

Operating Activities:
Net income	$	12,907		$	20,981		$	44,902		$	18,533
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for credit losses		38,136			18,856			129,329			42,985
Depreciation and amortization		10,125			10,138			15,246			15,350
Stock-based compensation expense		3,431			4,942			5,132			7,612
Tax (expense) benefit from stock-based compensation arrangements		(650	)		395			(140	)		558
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation arrangements		(84	)		(464	)		(724	)		(684	)
Net amortization (accretion) of premium on securities		4			(859	)		129			(1,164	)
Mortgage servicing rights fair value change and amortization, net		1,218			668			2,057			1,053
Originations and purchases of loans held-for-sale		(2,753,665	)		(946,621	)		(3,713,883	)		(1,290,805	)
Originations of premium finance receivables held-for-sale		(520,000	)		—			(790,044	)		—
Proceeds from sales and securitizations of premium finance receivables held-for-sale								106,282			—
Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans held-for-sale		2,542,202			945,415			3,620,400			1,342,456
Bank owned life insurance income, net of claims		(851	)		(1,464	)		(1,403	)		(1,941	)
Gain on sales of premium finance receivables		(518	)		(1,707	)		(4,147	)		(2,163	)
Increase in trading securities, net		(18,574	)		(306	)		(24,805	)		(672	)
Net decrease in brokerage customer receivables		200			4,545
Net (increase) decrease in brokerage customer receivables								(1,540	)		4,770
Gain on mortgage loans sold		(28,521	)		(7,621	)		(38,656	)		(10,497	)
Losses on available-for-sale securities, net		498			1,473			910			553
Loss on sales of premises and equipment, net		27			79			366			84
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable and other assets, net		6,372			(687	)
(Decrease) increase in accrued interest payable and other liabilities, net		(7,597	)		24,085
Bargain purchase gain								(113,062	)		—
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable and other assets, net								(34,073	)		(8,241	)
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable and other liabilities, net								25,599			18,963

Net Cash (Used for) Provided by Operating Activities		(715,340	)		71,848			(772,125	)		136,750


Investing Activities:
Proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale securities		975,126			587,493			1,146,564			687,323
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities		1,071,192			609,498			1,145,137			744,488
Purchases of available-for-sale securities		(1,760,047	)		(1,319,858	)		(2,153,313	)		(1,503,619	)
Proceeds from sales of premium finance receivables		—			184,255
Proceeds from sales and securitizations of premium finance receivables								600,000			217,834
Net cash paid for acquisition								(685,456	)		—
Net (increase) decrease in interest-bearing deposits with banks		(532,750	)		3,972			(1,045,353	)		5,724
Net increase in loans		(18,092	)		(561,137	)
Net decrease (increase) in loans								122,433			(781,956	)
Purchases of premises and equipment, net		(9,272	)		(18,657	)		(16,404	)		(23,719	)

Net Cash Used for Investing Activities		(273,843	)		(514,434	)		(886,392	)		(653,925	)


Financing Activities:
Increase in deposit accounts		814,576			289,873			1,470,407			358,033
(Decrease) increase in other borrowings, net		(92,478	)		128,575			(84,693	)		41,957
Decrease in notes payable, net		—			(18,725	)		—			(18,675	)
Increase in Federal Home Loan Bank advances, net		—			23,801
(Decrease) increase in Federal Home Loan Bank advances, net								(2,000	)		23,802
Repayment of subordinated note		(5,000	)		—			(5,000	)		—
Issuance of preferred stock, net of issuance costs								—			49,379
Excess tax benefits from stock—based compensation arrangements		84			464			724			684
Issuance of common shares resulting from exercise of stock options, employee stock purchase plan and conversion of common stock warrants		1,307			1,905			2,741			2,804
Common stock repurchases		(12	)		(62	)		(147	)		(94	)
Dividends paid		(11,366	)		(4,231	)		(17,658	)		(8,487	)

Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		707,111			421,600			1,364,374			449,403

Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents		(282,072	)		(20,986	)		(294,143	)		(67,772	)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period		445,904			261,154			445,904			261,154

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period	$	163,832		$	240,168		$	151,761		$	193,382

WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1)Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements of Wintrust Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries (“Wintrust” or “the Company”) presented herein are unaudited, but in the opinion of management reflect all necessary adjustments of a normal or recurring nature for a fair presentation of results as of the dates and for the periods covered by the consolidated financial statements.

Wintrust is a financial holding company engaged in the business of providing traditional community banking services to customers in the Chicago metropolitan area and southern Wisconsin. Additionally, the Company operates various non-bank subsidiaries. Wintrust has 15 wholly-owned bank subsidiaries (collectively, “the Banks”), nine of which the Company started as~~de novo~~ institutions, including Lake Forest Bank & Trust Company (“Lake Forest Bank”), Hinsdale Bank & Trust Company (“Hinsdale Bank”), North Shore Community Bank & Trust Company (“North Shore Bank”), Libertyville Bank & Trust Company (“Libertyville Bank”), Barrington Bank & Trust Company, N.A. (“Barrington Bank”), Crystal Lake Bank & Trust Company, N.A. (“Crystal Lake Bank”), Northbrook Bank & Trust Company (“Northbrook Bank”), Beverly Bank & Trust Company, N.A. (“Beverly Bank”) and Old Plank Trail Community Bank, N.A. (“Old Plank Trail Bank”). The Company acquired Advantage National Bank (“Advantage Bank”) in October 2003, Village Bank & Trust (“Village Bank”) in December 2003, Northview Bank & Trust (“Northview Bank”) in September 2004, Town Bank in October 2004, State Bank of The Lakes in January 2005, First Northwest Bank in March 2005 and Hinsbrook Bank and Trust (“Hinsbrook Bank”) in May 2006. In December 2004, Northview Bank’s Wheaton branch became its main office, it was renamed Wheaton Bank & Trust (“Wheaton Bank”) and its two Northfield locations became branches of Northbrook Bank and its Mundelein location became a branch of Libertyville Bank. In May 2005, First Northwest Bank was merged into Village Bank. In November 2006, Hinsbrook Bank’s Geneva branch was renamed St. Charles Bank & Trust (“St. Charles Bank”), its Willowbrook, Downers Grove and Darien locations became branches of Hinsdale Bank and its Glen Ellyn location became a branch of Wheaton Bank.

The Company provides, on a national basis, loans to businesses to finance insurance premiums on their commercial insurance policies (“premium finance receivables”) through First Insurance Funding Corporation (“FIFC”). FIFC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Lake Forest Bank. In November 2007, the Company acquired Broadway Premium Funding Corporation (“Broadway”). Broadway also provides loans to businesses to finance liability, property and casualty and other commercial insurance premiums, mainly through insurance agents and brokers in the northeastern portion of the United States and California. On October 1, 2008, Broadway merged with its parent, FIFC, but continues to utilize the Broadway brand in serving its segment of the marketplace.

In 2007, FIFC began financing life insurance policy premiums for high net-worth individuals. These loans are originated through independent insurance agents with assistance from financial advisors and legal counsel. The life insurance policy is the primary form of collateral. In addition, these loans can be secured with a letter of credit or certificate of deposit.

Wintrust, through Tricom, Inc. of Milwaukee (“Tricom”), provides high-yielding short-term accounts receivable financing (“Tricom finance receivables”) and value-added out-sourced administrative services, such as data processing of payrolls, billing and cash management services, to the temporary staffing industry, with clients located throughout the United States. Tricom is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hinsdale Bank.

The Company provides a full range of wealth management services through its trust, asset management and broker-dealer subsidiaries. Trust and investment services are provided at the Banks through the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Wayne Hummer Trust Company, N.A. (“WHTC”), a~~de novo~~company started in 1998. Wayne Hummer Investments, LLC (“WHI”) is a broker-dealer providing a full range of private client and securities brokerage services to clients located primarily in the Midwest. WHI has office locations staffed by one or more registered financial advisors in a majority of the Company’s Banks. WHI also provides a full range of investment services to individuals through a network of relationships with community-based financial institutions primarily in Illinois. WHI is a wholly-owned subsidiary of North Shore Bank. Wayne Hummer Asset Management Company (“WHAMC”) provides money management services and advisory services to individuals, institutions and municipal and tax-exempt organizations, in

addition to portfolio management and financial supervision for a wide range of pension and profit-sharing plans. WHI and WHAMC were acquired in 2002, and in February 2003, the Company acquired Lake Forest Capital Management (“LFCM”), a registered investment advisor, which was merged into WHAMC. In April 2009, WHAMC purchased certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of Advanced Investment Partners, LLC (“AIP”). AIP is an investment management firm specializing in the active management of domestic equity investment strategies. WHTC, WHI and WHAMC are referred to collectively as the “Wayne Hummer Companies.”

In May 2004, the Company acquired Wintrust Mortgage Corporation (“WMC”) (formerly known as WestAmerica Mortgage Company) and its affiliate, Guardian Real Estate Services, Inc. (“Guardian”). WMC engages primarily in the origination and purchase of residential mortgages for sale into the secondary market. WMC maintains principal origination offices in eight states, including Illinois, and originates loans in other states through wholesale and correspondent offices. WMC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Barrington Bank. Guardian provided document preparation and other loan closing services to WMC and a network of mortgage brokers. Guardian was merged into Barrington Bank in November 2008. In December 2008, WMC acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of the mortgage banking business of Professional Mortgage Partners (“PMP”).

Wintrust Information Technology Services Company (“WITS”) provides information technology support, item capture, imaging and statement preparation services to the Wintrust subsidiaries and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Wintrust.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements are unaudited and do not include information or footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of financial condition, results of operations or cash flows in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Company’s Annual Report and Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. Operating results reported for the three-month and year-to-date periods are not necessarily indicative of the results which may be expected for the entire year. Reclassifications of certain prior period amounts have been made to conform to the current period presentation.

The preparation of the financial statements requires management to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities. Management believes that the estimates made are reasonable, however, changes in estimates may be required if economic or other conditions develop differently from management’s expectations. In preparing these financial statements, management has evaluated events and transactions for potential recognition and or disclosure through ~~August 10,~~November 9, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued. Certain policies and accounting principles inherently have a greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions and judgments and as such have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than originally reported. Management views critical accounting policies to be those which are highly dependent on subjective or complex judgments, estimates and assumptions, and where changes in those estimates and assumptions could have a significant impact on the financial statements. Management currently views the determination of the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for losses on lending-related commitments, estimations of fair value, the valuations required for impairment testing of goodwill, the valuation and accounting for derivative instruments and income taxes as the accounting areas that require the most subjective and complex judgments, and as such could be the most subject to revision as new information becomes available. Descriptions of our significant accounting policies are included in Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) of the Company’s 2008 Form 10-K.

(2)Recent Accounting Developments

Accounting Standards Codification

In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ~~SFAS~~Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles — a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162” (“~~SFAS 168”~~The Codification”). ~~SFAS 168 replaces the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) hierarchy with two levels of GAAP: authoritative~~The Codification reorganized existing U.S. accounting and ~~nonauthoritative. On July 1, 2009,~~reporting standards issued by the FASB ~~Accounting Standards Codification became the~~and other related private sector standard setters into a single source of authoritative ~~nongovernmental GAAP, except for rules and interpretive releases of the Securities Exchange Commission. All~~accounting principles arranged by topic. The Codification supersedes all existing U.S. accounting standards; all other ~~non-grandfathered~~ accounting literature ~~became nonauthoritative.~~not included in the Codification (other than Securities and Exchange Commission guidance for publicly-traded companies) is considered non-authoritative. The ~~Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 168 to have~~Codification was effective on a ~~material impact on the Company’s financial statements.~~

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)” (“SFAS 167”). SFAS 167 eliminates exceptions to consolidating qualifying special purpose entities, contains new criteria for determining the primary beneficiary, and increases the frequency of required reassessments to determine whether a company is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. This Statement clarifies, but does not significantly change, the characteristics that identify a variable interest entity. This Statement also contains a new requirement that any term, transaction, or arrangement that does not have a substantive effect on an entity’s status as a variable interest entity, a company’s power over a variable interest entity, or a company’s obligation to absorb losses or its right to receive benefits of a variable interest entity must be disregarded in applying the provisions of Interpretation 46(R). This Statement is effectiveprospective basis for interim and annual reporting periods ~~beginning~~ending after ~~November~~September 15, 2009. The ~~Company does~~adoption of the Codification changed the Company’s references to U.S. GAAP accounting standards but did not ~~expect these proposed changes to have a material~~ impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets and Variable Interest Entities

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, “Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140” (“SFAS 166”). and SFAS No. 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)” (SFAS 167) which have not yet been adopted into Codification. The amendments will become effective for the Company on January 1, 2010. SFAS 166 amends SFAS 140 by removing the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity, changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets and requires additional disclosures about a

transferor’s continuing involvement in transferred financial assets. ~~This Statement~~As described more fully in Note 8 — Loan Securitization, the Company has transferred certain loans to a qualifying special purpose entity (“QSPE”) which is ~~effective for all interim and annual periods beginning after November 15, 2009. The Company~~not currently subject to consolidation.

SFAS 167 amends FIN 46(R) “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (“FIN 46R”) by significantly changing the criteria by which an enterprise determines whether it must consolidate a variable interest entity (“VIE”). A VIE is an entity, typically an SPE, which has insufficient equity at risk or which is not controlled through voting rights held by equity investors. FIN 46R currently ~~evaluating~~requires that a VIE be consolidated by the ~~potential~~enterprise that will absorb a majority of the expected losses or expected residual returns created by the assets of the VIE. SFAS 167 amends FIN 46R to require that a VIE be consolidated by the enterprise that has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the ~~new pronouncement~~VIE’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE. SFAS 167 also requires that an enterprise continually reassess, based on current facts and circumstances, whether it should consolidate the VIEs with which it is involved.

The adoption of the amendments on January 1, 2010 will ~~have~~result in the consolidation of a QSPE that is not currently recorded on ~~its financial statements.~~the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Condition. The consolidation will result in an increase in net assets, primarily loans and other borrowings, of approximately $600 million. The consolidation will also result in an increase in the provision for credit losses and will require a reversal of a portion of previously recognized securitization gains as a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings. See Note 8 — Loan Securitization, for additional information regarding the QSPE.

Subsequent Events

In May 2009, the FASB issued ~~SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events” (“SFAS 165”). SFAS 165 provides~~new guidance for the recognition and disclosure of subsequent events not addressed in other applicable generally accepted accounting principles. ~~This Statement also~~The new guidance, which is now part of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 855, “Subsequent Events”, requires entities to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated and the nature and estimated financial effects of certain subsequent events. This ~~Statement~~new guidance is effective for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009, and ~~shall~~will be applied prospectively. The adoption of ~~SFAS 165~~this new guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. See Note 18 — Subsequent Events, for disclosures relating to subsequent events.

Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments

In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 141R-1, “Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from Contingencies (“FSP 141R-1”). FSP 141R-1 amends and clarifies SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations” (SFAS 141R),new guidance related to ~~address application issues on initial recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and accounting, and~~the disclosure of ~~assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in a business combination. FSP 141R-1~~the fair value of financial instruments. The new guidance, which is effective for assets or liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The adoptionnow part of ~~FSP 141R-1 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.~~

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (“FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1”). FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 amends FASB Statement No. 107,"~~Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial~~ASC 825, “Financial Instruments”, ~~to require disclosures about~~requires disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments ~~for~~whenever a publicly traded company issues financial information in interim reporting periods in addition to the annual disclosure required at year-end. The provisions of ~~publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 is~~the new guidance were effective for interim ~~reporting~~ periods ending after June 15, ~~2009, with early adoption permitted.~~2009. The Company adopted ~~this FSP~~the new guidance in the second quarter of 2009. ~~The adoption expanded the Company’s disclosures regarding the use of fair value in interim periods.~~ See Note 45 — Available-for-sale Securities, for the required disclosures in accordance with this ~~FSP.~~guidance.

Other-Than-Temporary Impairments

In April 2009, the FASB issued ~~FSP No. FAS 115-2~~new guidance for the accounting for other-than temporary impairments. The new guidance, which is now part of ASC 320 “Investments — Debt and ~~FAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments”~~Equity Securities” (“~~FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2”~~ASC 320”)~~. FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2~~, amends the other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) guidance in GAAP for debt securities and the presentation and disclosure requirements of OTTI on debt and equity securities in the financial statements. This ~~FSP~~new guidance does not amend existing recognition and measurement guidance related to OTTI of equity securities. ~~FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2~~The new guidance requires separate display of losses related to credit deterioration and losses related to other market factors. When an entity does not intend to sell the security and it is more likely than not that an entity will not have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis, it must recognize the credit component of OTTI in earnings and the remaining portion in other comprehensive income. ~~FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2~~The new guidance is effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ~~this FSP~~the new guidance in the second quarter of 2009. See Note ~~4 —~~5 - Available-for-sale Securities, for a further discussion on the adoption of ~~this FSP.~~the new guidance.

Additional Fair Value Measurement Guidance

In April 2009, the FASB issued ~~FSP No. FAS 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume~~new guidance for determining when a transaction is not orderly and ~~Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly” (“FSP FAS 157-4”). FSP FAS 157-4 provides additional guidance~~ for estimating fair value when there has been a significant decrease in ~~accordance with SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”), when~~ the volume and level of activity for ~~the~~an asset or ~~liability have significantly decreased. FSP FAS 157-4 also includes~~liability. The new guidance, ~~on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction~~which is ~~not orderly. FSP FAS 157-4~~now part of ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (ASC 820), requires disclosure of the inputs and valuation techniques used, as well as any changes in valuation techniques and inputs used during the period, to measure fair value in interim and annual periods. In addition, the presentation of the fair value hierarchy is required to be presented by major security type as described in ASC 320. The provisions of the new guidance were effective for interim ~~reporting~~ periods ending after June 15, ~~2009, with early adoption permitted.~~2009. The adoption of ~~FSP FAS 157-4~~the new guidance in the second quarter of 2009 did not have a material ~~impact~~effect on the Company’s financial statements.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

In March 2008, the FASB issued ~~Statement~~new guidance on the disclosure of ~~Financial Accounting Standards No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments~~derivative instruments and hedging activities. The new guidance, which is now a part of ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging ~~Activities — an amendment~~Activities”, requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of, ~~FASB Statement No. 133” (“SFAS 161”). Effective~~and gains and losses on, derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements. The provisions of the new guidance were effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years ~~and interim periods~~ beginning after November 15, 2008, SFAS 161 amends and expands the disclosure requirements of Statement No. 133 by requiring enhanced disclosures for how and why an entity uses derivative instruments; how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under Statement No. 133 and its related interpretations; and how derivative instruments and related items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS 161 only relates to disclosures and did not have an impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.2008. See Note 1014 — Derivative Financial Instruments, for the required disclosures in accordance with ~~SFAS 161.~~this new guidance.

Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements

In December 2007, the FASB issued ~~Statement~~new guidance for the accounting for noncontrolling interests. The new guidance, which is now part of ~~Financial Accounting Standards No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements-an amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS 160”). SFAS 160~~ASC 810, “Consolidation”, establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The adoption of ~~SFAS 160~~the new guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Business Combinations

In April 2009, the FASB issued revised guidance for recognizing and measuring pre-acquisition contingencies in a business combination. The revised guidance, which is now part of ASC 805, “Business Combinations”, revises the definition of a business and amends and clarifies prior guidance to address application issues on initial recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and accounting, and disclosure of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in a business combination. The revised guidance is effective for assets or liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The adoption of the revised guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued ~~SFAS No. 141(R),~~revised guidance for the accounting for business combinations. The revised guidance, which is now part of ASC 805, “Business Combinations” ~~(“SFAS 141R”). SFAS 141R~~(ASC 805), requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize the full fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition date; the immediate expense recognition of transaction costs; and accounting for restructuring plans separately from the business combination. ~~SFAS 141R~~The application of ASC 805 eliminates separate recognition of the acquired allowance for loan losses on the acquirer’s balance sheet as credit related factors will be incorporated directly into the fair value of the loans recorded at the acquisition date. ~~SFAS 141R~~The application of ASC 805 is effective for business combinations occurring after December 15, 2008. The ~~adoption~~Company applied ASC 805 to its July 28, 2009 acquisition of ~~SFAS 141R did~~a majority of the U.S. life insurance premium finance assets of A.I. Credit Corp. and A.I. Credit Consumer Discount Company, subsidiaries of American International Group, Inc. See Note 3 — Business Combinations, for more information on ASC 805.

(3)Business Combinations

On July 28, 2009 First Insurance Funding Corporation (“FIFC”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, purchased the majority of the U.S. life insurance premium finance assets of A.I. Credit Corp. and A.I. Credit Consumer Discount Company (“the sellers”), subsidiaries of American International Group, Inc. After giving effect to post-closing adjustments, an aggregate unpaid principal loan balance of $949.3 million was purchased for $685.3 million in cash. At closing, a portion of the portfolio, with an aggregate unpaid principal loan balance of $321.1 million, and a corresponding portion of the purchase price of $232.8 million were placed in escrow, pending the receipt of required third party consents. To the extent any of the required consents are not obtained prior to October 28, 2010, the corresponding portion of the portfolio will be reassumed by the applicable seller, and the corresponding portion of the purchase price will be returned to FIFC. Also, as a part of the purchase, an aggregate of $84.4 million of additional life insurance premium finance assets were available for future purchase by FIFC subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. The majority of these conditions were satisfied in the fourth quarter of 2009, see Note 18 — Subsequent Events, for more details.

The purchase was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with ASC 805. Accordingly, the impact related to this transaction is included in the Company’s financial statements only since the effective date of acquisition. The purchased assets and assumed liabilities were recorded at their respective acquisition date fair values, and identifiable intangible assets were recorded at fair value. Under ASC 805 a gain is recorded equal to the amount by which the fair value of assets purchased exceeded the fair value of liabilities assumed and consideration paid. As such, the Company recognized a $113.1 million bargain purchase gain in the third quarter of 2009 relating to all of the loans it acquired which have all contingencies removed as of September 30, 2009. This gain is shown as a ~~material impact~~component of non-interest income on the Company’s ~~financial statements.~~Consolidated Statement of Income.

The difference between the fair value of the loans acquired and the outstanding principal balance of these loans represents a discount of $113.3 million and is comprised of two components, an accretable component totaling $74.8 million and a non-accretable component totaling $38.5 million. The accretable component will be recognized into interest income using the effective yield method over its estimated remaining life. The non-accretable portion will be evaluated each quarter and if the loans’ credit related conditions improve, a relative portion will be transferred to the accretable component and accreted over future periods. In the event of a prepayment, accretion of both the accretable and non-accretable component will be accelerated into the quarter in which a specific loan prepays in whole. Currently, the Company has not established an allowance for loan losses relating to the portfolio purchased in this transaction. If credit related conditions deteriorate, an allowance related to these loans will be established as part of the provision for loan losses.

The following table summarizes the net fair value of assets acquired and the resulting bargain purchase gain at the date of acquisition:


(Dollars in thousands)
Assets:
Loans	$	835,952
Customer list intangible		1,800
Other assets		150

Total assets		837,902


Cash paid		685,456


Total bargain purchase gain	$	152,446


Bargain purchase gain recorded in third quarter 2009		113,062
Bargain purchase gain deferred pending third party consents	$	39,384

recognition of other than temporary impairment for debt securities resulted in the recognition of a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings with a corresponding charge to accumulated other comprehensive income of $309,000. No impairment charges were recorded in the second quarter of 2009. In the third quarter of 2009, the Company recognized a $472,000 impairment charge on a corporate note of a financial issuer.

The following tables present the portion of the Company’s available-for-sale securities portfolio which has gross unrealized losses, reflecting the length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at September 30, 2009:


	Continuous unrealized					Continuous unrealized
	losses existing for					losses existing for
	less than 12 months					greater than 12 months					Total
	Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized
(Dollars in thousands)	Value		Losses			Value		Losses			Value		Losses

U.S. Treasury	$	112,896		(8,701	)		—		—			112,896		(8,701	)
U.S. Government agencies		132,423		(1,540	)		—		—			132,423		(1,540	)
Municipal		13,992		(196	)		2,105		(94	)		16,097		(290	)
Corporate notes and other:
Financial issuers	11,096		(698		)	3,462		(2,475		)	14,558		(3,173		)
Retained subordinated securities	—		—			—		—			—		—
Other	—		—			7,477		(270		)	7,477		(270		)
Mortgage-backed:
Agency	390		(8		)	—		—			390		(8		)
Non-agency CMOs	37,641		(699		)	157		(6		)	37,798		(705		)
Non-agency CMOs — Alt A	34,107		(1,655		)	—		—			34,107		(1,655		)
Federal Reserve and FHLB stock		—		—			—		—			—		—
Other equity securities	—			—		2,230			(142	)	2,230			(142	)

Total	$	342,545		(13,497	)	15,431			(2,987	)	357,976			(16,484	)

The Company does not consider these unrealized losses to be other-than-temporary at September 30, 2009. The Company does not intend to sell these investments and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell these investments before recovery of the amortized cost bases, which may be the maturity dates of the securities. The unrealized losses within each category have occurred as a result of changes in interest rates and market spreads subsequent to purchase. A substantial portion of the securities that have unrealized losses are either U.S. Treasury securities or corporate notes of financial issuers. The corporate notes of financial issuers with continuous losses existing for greater than 12 months represent three trust-preferred securities with unrealized losses totaling $2.5 million. These three securities represent financial issuers with high investment grade credit ratings. Most of these obligations were purchased in 1999, have interest rates significantly below the rates at which these types of obligations are currently issued, and have maturity dates in 2027. Although they are currently callable by the issuers, it is unlikely that they will be called in the near future as the interest rates are very attractive to the issuers. A review of the issuers indicated that they have recently raised equity capital and/or have strong capital ratios. The Company does not own any pooled trust-preferred securities.

The Company conducts a regular assessment of its investment securities to determine whether securities are other-than-temporarily impaired considering, among other factors, the nature of the securities, credit ratings or financial condition of the issuer, the extent and duration of the unrealized loss, expected cash flows, market conditions and the Company’s ability to hold the securities through the anticipated recovery period.

During the first quarter of 2009, the Company recorded $2.1 million of other than temporary impairment on certain corporate debt securities. Effective April 1, 2009, the Company adopted ~~FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, which provides~~new guidance for the measurement and recognition of other than temporary impairment for debt ~~securities.~~securities, which is now part of ASC 320. If an entity does not intend to sell, and it is more likely than not that the entity will not be required to sell a debt security before recovery of its cost basis, impairment should be separated into (a) the amount representing credit loss and (b) the amount related to all other factors. The amount of impairment related to credit loss is recognized in earnings and the impairment related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income (loss). To determine the amount related to credit loss, the Company applied a method similar to that described by ~~SFAS 114, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan”~~ASC 310, “Receivables”, using a single best estimate of expected cash flows. The Company’s adoption of ~~FSP 115-2~~new guidance for the measurement and FAS 124-2 resulted in the recognition of a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings with a corresponding charge to accumulated other comprehensive income of $309,000. No impairment charges were recognized in the second quarter of 2009.

Continuous unrealized Continuous unrealized
losses existing for losses existing for
less than 12 months greater than 12 months Total
Fair Unrealized Fair Unrealized Fair Unrealized
(Dollars in thousands) Value Losses Value Losses Value Losses

U.S. Treasury $ 110,928 (10,952 ) — — 110,928 (10,952 )
U.S. Government agencies 205,384 (3,340 ) — — 205,384 (3,340 )
Municipal 15,787 (546 ) 1,777 (191 ) 17,564 (737 )
Corporate notes and other debt 11,242 (2,489 ) 19,945 (4,668 ) 31,187 (7,157 )
Mortgage-backed 128,839 (3,704 ) 174 (1 ) 129,013 (3,705 )
Federal Reserve/FHLB stock and other equity securities 584 (1 ) 4,326 (1,978 ) 4,910 (1,979 )

Total $ 472,764 (21,032 ) 26,222 (6,838 ) 498,986 (27,870 )

The Company does not consider these unrealized losses to be other-than-temporary at June 30, 2009. The unrealized losses within each category have occurred as a result of changes in interest rates and market spreads subsequent to purchase. A substantial portion of the securities that have unrealized losses are either U.S. Treasury securities or corporate debt obligations. The corporate debt obligations include four trust-preferred securities with unrealized losses totaling $4.3 million. These four securities represent financial issuers with high investment grade credit ratings. Most of these obligations were purchased in 1999, have interest rates significantly below the rates at which these types of obligations are currently issued, and have maturity dates in 2027. Although they are currently callable by the issuers, it is unlikely that they will be called in the near future as the interest rates are very attractive to the issuers. A review of the issuers indicated that they have recently raised equity capital and/or have strong capital ratios. The Company does not intend to sell these investments and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell these investments before recovery of the amortized cost bases, which may be the maturity dates of the securities.

In prior periods the Company recognized other than temporary impairment charges on corporate debt securities in the Company’s high-yield portfolio as well as other corporate debt (non-financial issuers). Changes in the amount of credit losses recognized in net income on these corporate debt securities are summarized as follows:


	Three Months Ended			Three Months Ended			Nine Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2009			September 30, 2009			September 30, 2009
Balance at beginning of period	$	(6,181	)

Balance at March 31, 2009				$	(4,195	)	$	(6,181	)
Credit losses not previously recognized		—			(472	)		(472	)
Reductions for securities sold during the period		1,986			3,043			5,029

Balance at end of period	$	(4,195	)	$	(1,624	)	$	(1,624	)

Our commercial real estate loan portfolio predominantly relates to owner-occupied real estate, and our loans are generally secured by a first mortgage lien and assignment of rents on the property. Since most of our bank branches are located in the Chicago, Illinois metropolitan area and southeastern Wisconsin, 91.6% of our commercial real estate loan portfolio is located in this region. Commercial real estate market conditions continued to be under stress in the third quarter of 2009, and we expect this trend to continue. These conditions have negatively affected our commercial real estate loan portfolio, and as of September 30, 2009, our allowance for loan losses related to this portfolio is $54.7 million.

We make commercial loans for many purposes, including: working capital lines, which are generally renewable annually and supported by business assets, personal guarantees and additional collateral; loans to condominium and homeowner associations originated through Barrington Bank’s Community Advantage program; small aircraft financing, an earning asset niche developed at Crystal Lake Bank; and franchise lending at Lake Forest Bank. Commercial business lending is generally considered to involve a higher degree of risk than traditional consumer bank lending, and as a result of the economic recession, allowance for loan losses in our commercial loan portfolio is $25.1 million as of September 30, 2009.

Our allowance for loan losses for commercial and commercial real estate loans in the aggregate has increased to $79.9 million as of September 30, 2009 from $57.0 million as of December 31, 2008 and $54.4 million as of September 30, 2008.

The Company also participates in mortgage warehouse lending by providing interim funding to unaffiliated mortgage bankers to finance residential mortgages originated by such bankers for sale into the secondary market. The Company’s loans to the mortgage bankers are secured by the business assets of the mortgage companies as well as the specific mortgage loans funded by the Company, after they have been pre-approved for purchase by third party end lenders. End lender re-payments are sent directly to the Company upon end-lenders’ acceptance of final loan documentation. The Company may also provide interim financing for packages of mortgage loans on a bulk basis in circumstances where the mortgage bankers desire to competitively bid on a number of mortgages for sale as a package in the secondary market. Typically, the Company will serve as sole funding source for its mortgage warehouse lending customers under short-term revolving credit agreements. Amounts advanced with respect to any particular mortgage loan are usually required to be repaid within 21 days.

Despite poor economic conditions generally, and the particularly difficult conditions in the U.S. residential real estate market experienced since 2008, our mortgage warehouse lending business has expanded during 2009 due to the high demand for mortgage re-financings given the historically low interest rate environment and the fact that many of our competitors exited the market in late 2008 and early 2009. The expansion of this business has caused our mortgage warehouse lines to increase to $73.8 million as of September 30, 2009 from $55.3 million as of December 31, 2008 and $44.4 million as of September 30, 2008. Additionally, our allowance for loan losses with respect to these loans is $985,000 as of September 30, 2009. Since the inception of this business, the Company has not suffered any related loan losses on these loans.

~~(6)~~(7)Allowance for Loan Losses, Allowance for Losses on Lending-Related Commitments and Impaired Loans

The following table presents a summary of the activity in the allowance for credit losses for the periods presented:


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2009			2008			2009			2008
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period	$	85,113		$	57,633		$	69,767		$	50,389
Provision for credit losses		91,193			24,129			129,329			42,985
Reclassification (to)/from allowance for losses on lending-related commitments		(1,543	)		—			(1,543	)		—
Charge-offs		(80,072	)		(15,816	)		(103,602	)		(28,067	)
Recoveries		405			381			1,145			1,020


Allowance for loan losses at period end	$	95,096		$	66,327		$	95,096		$	66,327

Allowance for losses on lending-related commitments at period end	$	3,129		$	493		$	3,129		$	493

Allowance for credit losses at period end	$	98,225		$	66,820		$	98,225		$	66,820

A summary of non-accrual, impaired loans and loans past due greater than 90 days and still accruing interest are as follows:


	September 30,		December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2009		2008
Non-performing loans:
Loans past due greater than 90 days and still accruing interest	$	36,937	$	25,385
Non-accrual loans		194,722		110,709

Total non-performing loans	$	231,659	$	136,094

Impaired loans (included in Non-performing loans):
Impaired loans with an allowance for loan loss required⁽¹⁾	$	96,514	$	73,849
Impaired loans with no allowance for loan loss required		51,494		39,860

Total impaired loans	$	148,008	$	113,709
��
Allowance for loan losses related to impaired loans	$	16,485	$	16,639

Restructured loans	$	—	$	—


⁽¹⁾		These impaired loans require an allowance for loan losses because the estimated fair value of the loans or related collateral is less than the recorded investment in the loans.

The average recorded investment in impaired loans was $125.8 million and $41.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

(8)Loan Securitization

Servicing Portfolio

During the third quarter of 2009, the Company entered into an off-balance sheet securitization transaction sponsored by FIFC. In connection with the securitization, premium finance receivables - - commercial were transferred, subject to credit recourse, to FIFC Premium Funding, LLC, a qualifying special purpose entity (the “QSPE”). The Company’s primary continuing involvement includes servicing the loans, retaining an undivided interest (the “seller’s interest”) in the loans, and holding certain retained interests (e.g., subordinated securities, overcollateralization of loans, cash reserve accounts, a servicing asset, and an interest-only strip). Provided that certain coverage test criteria are met, principal collections will be used to subsequently transfer additional loans to the QSPE during the stated revolving period. Additionally, upon the occurrence of certain events established in the representations and warranties, FIFC may be required to repurchase ineligible loans that were transferred to the QSPE. The maximum amount of risk related to these repurchase provisions and non performance by the underlying borrowers is approximately equal to the carrying value of the Company’s retained interests. As of September 30, 2009, no loans have been repurchased.

Instruments issued by the QSPE included $600 million Class A notes that bear an annual interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.45% (the “Notes”) and have an expected average term of 2.93 years with any unpaid balance due and payable in full on February 17, 2014. At the time of issuance, the Notes were eligible collateral under the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (“TALF”). The Notes are rated Aaa by Moody’s and AAA by Standard & Poor’s. Class B and Class C notes (“Subordinated securities”), which are recorded in the form of zero coupon bonds, were also issued and were retained by the Company. These notes are rated A and BBB respectively by Standard and Poor’s.

The seller’s interest maintained by the Company is equal to the balance of all loans transferred to the QSPE plus the associated accrued interest receivable less the investors’ portion of those assets (securitized loans). Seller’s interest is carried at historical cost and reported as loans, net of unearned income on the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Condition.

The following table illustrates the activity in the QSPE for the quarter ended September 30, 2009:


(Dollars in thousands)	2009
FIFC Premium Funding, LLC loan assets, June 30	$	—
Impact of issuance		695,103
Collections reinvested		106,282
Account activity, net		(140,129	)

FIFC Premium Funding, LLC loan assets, September 30	$	661,256

The following table details the securitized loans and seller’s interest components of the FIFC Premium Funding, LLC loan assets in the preceding table:


(Dollars in thousands)	2009
Securitized loans, June 30	$	—
Impact of issuances, external		600,000
Impact of issuances, retained		83,762
Collections reinvested		106,282
Account activity, net		(137,855	)

Securitized loans, September 30	$	652,189

Seller’s interest, June 30	$	—
Impact of issuance		11,341
Account activity, net		(2,274	)

Seller’s interest, September 30	$	9,067

Securitization Income

At the time of a loan securitization, the Company records a gain/(loss) on sale, which is calculated as the difference between the proceeds from the sale and the book basis of the loans sold. The book basis is determined by allocating the carrying amount of the sold loans between the loans sold and the interests retained based on their relative fair values. Such fair values are based on market prices at the date of transfer for the sold loans and on the estimated present value of future cash flows for retained interests. Gains on sale from securitizations are reported in gain on sales of premium finance receivables in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income and were $3.4 million in the third quarter of 2009. The income component resulting from the release of credit reserves upon classification as held-for-sale is reported as a reduction of provision for credit losses.

Also reported in gain on sales of premium finance receivables are changes in the fair value of the interest-only strip. This amount is the excess cash flow from interest collections allocated to the investors’ interests after deducting the interest paid on investor certificates, credit losses, contractual servicing fees, and other expenses. Changes in the fair value of the interest-only strip of $173,000 were reported in gain on sale of premium finance receivables in the third quarter of 2009.

The Company has retained servicing responsibilities for the transferred loans and earns a related fee. Servicing fee income was $712,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 and is reported in other non-interest income in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Retained Interests

The Company retained subordinated interests in the securitized loans. These interests include the Subordinated securities, overcollateralization of loans, cash reserves, a servicing asset, and an interest-only strip. The following table presents the Company’s retained interests at September 30, 2009:


(Dollars in thousands)	2009
Subordinated securities (a)	$	48,004
Residual interests held (b)		42,622
Servicing asset (b)		1,336

Total retained interests	$	91,962


(a)		The subordinated securities areaccounted for at fair value and are reported as available-for-sale securities on the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Condition with unrealized gains recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income. See Note 15 for further discussion on fair value.

(b)		The residual interests and servicing asset are accounted for at fair value and reported in other assets on the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Condition. Retained interests held includes overcollateralization of loans, cash reserve deposits, and an interest-only strip. See Note 15 for further discussion on fair value.

Key economic assumptions used in the measuring of fair value and the sensitivity of the current fair value to immediate adverse changes in those assumptions at September 30, 2009, for the Company’s servicing asset and other interests held related to securitized loans are presented in the following table:


	Subordinated			Residual			Servicing
(Dollars in thousands)	Securities			Interests			Asset
Fair Value of interest held	$	48,004		$	42,622		$	1,336

Expected weighted-average life (in months)		6.5			6.5			6.5
Decrease in fair value from:
1 month reduction	$	239		$	(1,206	)	$	(204	)
2 month reduction	$	479		$	(2,420	)	$	(403	)

Discount rate assumptions		5.97	%		8.75	%(a)		8.50	%
Decrease in fair value from:
100 basis point increase	$	(257	)	$	(200	)	$	(3	)
200 basis point increase	$	(513	)	$	(399	)	$	(6	)

Credit loss assumption					0.40	%		0.40	%
Decrease in fair value from:
10% higher loss				$	(154	)	$	—
20% higher loss				$	(310	)	$	—


(a)		Excludes the discount rate on cash reserve deposits deemed to be immaterial.

The sensitivities in the table above are hypothetical and caution should be exercised when relying on this data. Changes in fair value based on variations in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in the assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear.

The following table summarizes the changes in the fair value of the Company’s servicing asset for the quarter ended September 30, 2009:


(Dollars in thousands)	2009
Balance at June 30	$	—
Fair value determined upon transfer of loans		1,795
Changes in fair value due to changes in inputs and assumptions		(470	) (a)
Other changes		11	(b)

Balance at September 30	$	1,336


(a)		The Company measures servicing assets at fair value at each reporting date and reports changes in other non-interest income

(b)		Represents accretable yield reported in other non-interest income.

The key economic assumptions used in measuring the fair value of the servicing asset include the prepayment speed and weighted-average life, the discount rate, and default rate. The primary risk of material changes in the value of the servicing asset resides in the potential volatility in the economic assumptions used, particularly the prepayment speed and weighted-average life.

Other Disclosures

The table below summarizes cash flows received from the QSPE for the quarter ended September 30, 2009:


(Dollars in thousands)	2009
Proceeds from new securitizations during the period	$	600,000
Proceeds from collections reinvested in revolving securitizations		106,282
Servicing and other fees received		—
Excess spread received		—

The following table presents quantitative information about the premium finance receivables - commercial at September 30, 2009:


			Amount of
	Total		Loans 30 days or		Net Credit
	Amount of		More Past Due		Write-offs during
(Dollars in thousands)	Loans		or on Nonaccrual		the Quarter
Premium finance receivables — commercial	$	1,404,221	$	48,177	$	2,317
Less: Premium finance receivables — commercial securitized		652,189		6,096		—

Premium finance receivables — commercial on-balance sheet	$	752,032	$	42,081	$	2,317

(9)Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

A summary of the Company’s goodwill assets by business segment is presented in the following table:


	January 1,		Goodwill		Impairment		September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2009		Acquired		Losses		2009
Community banking	$	245,886	$	215	$	—	$	246,101
Specialty finance		16,095		—		—		16,095
Wealth management		14,329		—		—		14,329

Total	$	276,310	$	215	$	—	$	276,525

The increase in the Community banking segment’s goodwill in the first nine months of 2009 relates to additional contingent consideration paid to the former owners of Wintrust Mortgage Corporation (formerly known as WestAmerica Mortgage Company) and its affiliate, Guardian Real Estate Services, Inc., as a result of attaining certain performance measures. This was the final payment of contingent consideration due as a result of the Company’s 2004 acquisition of these companies.

Pursuant to the acquisition of PMP in December 2008, Wintrust could pay contingent consideration to the former owner of PMP as a result of attaining certain performance measures through December 2011. Any contingent payments made pursuant to this transaction would be reflected as increases in the Community banking segment’s goodwill.

A summary of finite-lived intangible assets as of September 30, 2009, December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008 and the expected amortization as of September 30, 2009 is as follows:


	September 30,			December 31,			September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2009			2008			2008
Customer list intangibles:
Gross carrying amount	$	5,052			3,252			3,252
Accumulated amortization		(3,202	)		(3,079	)		(3,011	)

Net carrying amount		1,850			173			241


Core deposit intangibles:
Core deposit intangibles
Gross carrying amount		27,918			27,918			27,918
Accumulated amortization		(15,400	)		(13,483	)		(12,770	)

Net carrying amount		12,518			14,435			15,148


Total other intangible assets, net	$	14,368			14,608			15,389


Estimated amortization
Actual in 9 months ended September 30, 2009	$	2,040
Estimated remaining in 2009		712
Estimated — 2010		2,466
Estimated — 2011		2,339
Estimated — 2012		2,336
Estimated — 2013		2,320

On July 28, 2009, the Company recorded $1.8 million in unamortized finite-lived intangible assets, classified on the Consolidated Statement of Condition as other intangible assets. These other intangible assets relate to the value of the customer lists in the acquisition of the life insurance premium finance portfolio and certain other assets related to the business and the assumption of certain related liabilities. The customer list intangible assets are amortized on an accelerated basis over an approximate six-year average life.

The $3.3 million of wealth management customer list intangibles recognized in connection with the acquisitions of Lake Forest Capital Management in 2003 and Wayne Hummer Asset Management Company in 2002 are being amortized over seven-year periods on an accelerated basis. The core deposit intangibles recognized in connection with the Company’s seven bank acquisitions between 2003 and 2006 are being amortized over ten-year periods on an accelerated basis. Amortization expense associated with finite-lived intangibles totaled approximately $2.0 million and $2.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

stock of some of the banks and contained several restrictive covenants, including the maintenance of various capital adequacy levels, asset quality and profitability ratios, and certain restrictions on dividends and other indebtedness. The Agreement was available to be utilized, as needed, to provide capital to fund continued growth at the Company’s banks and to serve as an interim source of funds for acquisitions, common stock repurchases or other general corporate purposes.

As more fully described in Note 18 — Subsequent Events, on October 30, 2009, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, which altered the terms of the Agreement, and which provides for a $1.0 million term loan and a $25 million revolving credit facility, which mature on October 29, 2010 and June 1, 2015, respectively.

Prior to September 1, 2009, the Company had a $101.0 million loan agreement with an unaffiliated bank which consisted of a $100.0 million revolving note, with a maturity date of August 31, 2009, and a $1.0 million note ~~that matures~~maturing on June 1, 2015. ~~At June 30, 2009, there~~Interest was ~~no outstanding balance on the $100.0 million revolving note. Interest is~~ calculated, at the Company’s option, at a floating rate equal to either: (1) LIBOR plus 200 basis points or (2) the greater of the lender’s prime rate or the Federal Funds Rate plus 50 basis points. The ~~Agreement is secured by~~Company had no outstanding balance under the ~~stock of some of~~revolving note during the Banks and contains several restrictive covenants, including the maintenance of various capital adequacy levels, asset quality and profitability ratios, and certain restrictions on dividends and other indebtedness. In May 2009 the Company and lender entered into an amendment to the Agreement which waived the prior violation of a debt covenant and amended the covenant to require that the Company have a return on assets in excess of zero percent based on quarterly regulatory filings through Junenine months ended September 30, 2009 and in excess of 0.35 percent thereafter. The Agreement may be utilized, as needed, to provide capital to fund continued growth at the Company’s Banks and to serve as an interim source of funds for acquisitions, common stock repurchases or other general corporate purposes.2009.

Federal Home Loan Bank advances consist of fixed rate obligations of the ~~Banks~~banks and are collateralized by qualifying residential real estate and home equity loans and certain securities. FHLB advances are stated at par value of the debt adjusted for unamortized fair value adjustments recorded in connection with advances acquired through acquisitions.

At ~~June~~September 30, 2009, securities sold under repurchase agreements represent ~~$62.2~~$73.4 million of customer balances in sweep accounts in connection with master repurchase agreements at the ~~Banks~~banks and ~~$180.3~~$176.9 million of short-term borrowings from brokers.

The subordinated notes represent three notes, issued in October 2002, April 2003 and October 2005 (funded in May 2006). The balances of the notes as of ~~June~~September 30, 2009 were $20.0 million, $20.0 million and $25.0 million, respectively. Each subordinated note requires annual principal payments of $5.0 million beginning in the sixth year, with final maturities in the tenth year. The Company may redeem the subordinated notes at any time prior to maturity. Interest on each note is calculated at a rate equal to LIBOR plus 130 basis points.

~~(8)~~(12)Junior Subordinated Debentures

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2009, the Company owned 100% of the common securities of nine trusts, Wintrust Capital Trust III, Wintrust Statutory Trust IV, Wintrust Statutory Trust V, Wintrust Capital Trust VII, Wintrust Capital Trust VIII, Wintrust Capital Trust IX, Northview Capital Trust I, Town Bankshares Capital Trust I, and First Northwest Capital Trust I (the “Trusts”) set up to provide long-term financing. The Northview, Town and First Northwest capital trusts were acquired as part of the acquisitions of Northview Financial Corporation, Town Bankshares, Ltd., and First Northwest Bancorp, Inc., respectively. The Trusts were formed for purposes of issuing trust preferred securities to third-party investors and investing the proceeds from the issuance of the trust preferred securities and common securities solely in junior subordinated debentures issued by the Company (or assumed by the Company in connection with an acquisition), with the same maturities and interest rates as the trust preferred securities. The junior subordinated debentures are the sole assets of the Trusts. In each Trust, the common securities represent approximately 3% of the junior subordinated debentures and the trust preferred securities represent approximately 97% of the junior subordinated debentures.

The Trusts are reported in the Company’s consolidated financial statements as unconsolidated subsidiaries. Accordingly, in the Consolidated Statements of Condition, the junior subordinated debentures issued by the Company to the Trusts are reported as liabilities and the common securities of the Trusts, all of which are owned by the Company, are included in available-for-sale securities.

1320

The following table provides a summary of the Company’s junior subordinated debentures as of ~~June~~September 30, 2009. The junior subordinated debentures represent the par value of the obligations owed to the Trusts and basis adjustments for unamortized fair value adjustments recognized at the respective acquisition dates for the Northview, Town and First Northwest obligations.


			Junior											Earliest				Junior											Earliest
	Trust Preferred		Subordinated		Rate		Rate at			Issue		Maturity		Redemption		Trust Preferred		Subordinated		Rate		Rate at			Issue		Maturity		Redemption
(Dollars in thousands)	Securities		Debentures		Structure		6/30/09			Date		Date		Date		Securities		Debentures		Structure		9/30/09			Date		Date		Date

Wintrust Capital Trust III	$	25,000	$	25,774		L+3.25		4.38	%		04/2003		04/2033		04/2008	$	25,000	$	25,774		L+3.25		3.76	%		04/2003		04/2033		04/2008
Wintrust Statutory Trust IV		20,000		20,619		L+2.80		3.40	%		12/2003		12/2033		12/2008		20,000		20,619		L+2.80		3.08	%		12/2003		12/2033		12/2008
Wintrust Statutory Trust V		40,000		41,238		L+2.60		3.20	%		05/2004		05/2034		06/2009		40,000		41,238		L+2.60		2.88	%		05/2004		05/2034		06/2009
Wintrust Capital Trust VII		50,000		51,550		L+1.95		2.58	%		12/2004		03/2035		03/2010		50,000		51,550		L+1.95		2.25	%		12/2004		03/2035		03/2010
Wintrust Capital Trust VIII		40,000		41,238		L+1.45		2.05	%		08/2005		09/2035		09/2010		40,000		41,238		L+1.45		1.73	%		08/2005		09/2035		09/2010
Wintrust Capital Trust IX		50,000		51,547	Fixed			6.84	%		09/2006		09/2036		09/2011		50,000		51,547	Fixed			6.84	%		09/2006		09/2036		09/2011
Northview Capital Trust I		6,000		6,186		L+3.00		4.03	%		08/2003		11/2033		08/2008		6,000		6,186		L+3.00		3.48	%		08/2003		11/2033		08/2008
Town Bankshares Capital Trust I		6,000		6,186		L+3.00		4.03	%		08/2003		11/2033		08/2008		6,000		6,186		L+3.00		3.48	%		08/2003		11/2033		08/2008
First Northwest Capital Trust I		5,000		5,155		L+3.00		3.60	%		05/2004		05/2034		05/2009		5,000		5,155		L+3.00		3.28	%		05/2004		05/2034		05/2009

Total			$	249,493				3.82	%									$	249,493				3.52	%

~~(9)~~(13)Segment Information

The segment financial information provided in the following tables has been derived from the internal profitability reporting system used by management to monitor and manage the financial performance of the Company. The Company evaluates segment performance based on after-tax profit or loss and other appropriate profitability measures common to each segment. Certain indirect expenses have been allocated based on actual volume measurements and other criteria, as appropriate. Inter-segment revenue and transfers are generally accounted for at current market prices. The parent and inter-segment eliminations reflect parent company information and inter-segment eliminations. Net revenue is a summation of net interest income and non-interest income. In the first quarter of 2009, the Company combined the premium finance and Tricom segments into the specialty finance segment. Prior period information has been restated to reflect this change.

The net interest income, net revenue and segment profit of the community banking segment includes income and related interest costs from portfolio loans that were purchased from the specialty finance segment. For purposes of internal segment profitability analysis, management reviews the results of its specialty finance segment as if all loans originated and sold to the community banking segment were retained within that segment’s operations, thereby causing inter-segment eliminations. See Note 3 — Business Combinations, for more information on the life insurance premium finance loan acquisition in the third quarter of 2009. Similarly, for purposes of analyzing the contribution from the wealth management segment, management allocates the net interest income earned by the community banking segment on deposit balances of customers of the wealth management segment to the wealth management segment. ~~(See “Wealth management deposits” discussion in~~See Note 10 — Deposits, ~~section of this report~~ for more information on these deposits.) The following tables present a summary of certain operating information for each reportable segment for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended for the periods shown:


	Three Months Ended												Three Months Ended
	June 30,						$ Change in			% Change in			September 30,						$ Change in			% Change in
(Dollars in thousands)	2009			2008			Contribution			Contribution			2009			2008			Contribution			Contribution
Net interest income:
Banking	$	69,606		$	57,964		$	11,642			20	%
Community banking													$	84,462		$	59,001		$	25,461			43	%
Specialty finance		19,204			17,136			2,068			12			33,731			17,019			16,712			98
Wealth management		7,010			4,484			2,526			56			7,769			4,481			3,288			73
Parent and inter-segment eliminations		(23,323	)		(20,184	)		(3,139	)		16			(38,299	)		(19,821	)		(18,478	)		93

Total net interest income	$	72,497		$	59,400		$	13,097			22	%	$	87,663		$	60,680		$	26,983			44	%


Non-interest income:
Banking	$	28,207		$	24,449		$	3,758			15	%
Community banking													$	18,931		$	14,325		$	4,606			32	%
Specialty finance		650			1,321			(671	)		(51	)		114,292			1,258			113,034			N/M
Wealth management		9,553			10,077			(524	)		(5	)		10,418			8,781			1,637			19
Parent and inter-segment eliminations		7,042			(2,243	)		9,285		NM				7,039			(2,449	)		9,488			N/M

Total non-interest income	$	45,452		$	33,604		$	11,848			35	%	$	150,680		$	21,915		$	128,765			N/M	%

Segment profit (loss):
Banking	$	4,667		$	14,948		$	(10,281	)		(69)	%

Net Revenue (loss):
Community banking													$	103,393		$	73,326		$	30,067			41	%
Specialty finance		8,080			8,089			(9	)		—			148,023			18,277			129,746			N/M
Wealth management		3,702			2,876			826			29			18,187			13,262			4,925			37
Parent and inter-segment eliminations		(9,900	)		(14,637	)		4,737			(32	)		(31,260	)		(22,270	)		(8,990	)		40

Total segment profit	$	6,549		$	11,276		$	(4,727	)		(42)	%
Total net revenue													$	238,343		$	82,595		$	155,748			189	%


Segment profit (loss):
Community banking													$	(35,372	)	$	1,364		$	(36,736	)		N/M	%
Specialty finance														120,428			7,881			112,547			N/M
Wealth management														4,357			2,408			1,949			81
Parent and inter-segment eliminations														(57,418	)		(14,101	)		(43,317	)		N/M

Total segment profit (loss)													$	31,995		$	(2,448	)	$	34,443			N/M	%


Segment assets:
Banking	$	11,214,377		$	9,791,254		$	1,423,123			15	%
Community banking													$	11,871,595		$	9,782,483		$	2,089,112			21	%
Specialty finance		1,146,971			1,239,496			(92,525	)		(8	)		2,069,415			1,321,968			747,447			57
Wealth management	��	58,068			57,881			187			—			60,990			56,614			4,376			8
Parent and inter-segment eliminations		(1,059,880	)		(1,165,554	)		105,674			(9	)		(1,865,979	)		(1,296,145	)		(569,834	)		44

Total segment assets	$	11,359,536		$	9,923,077		$	1,436,459			14	%	$	12,136,021		$	9,864,920		$	2,271,101			23	%


	Six Months Ended												Nine Months Ended
	June 30,						$ Change in			% Change in			September 30,						$ Change in			% Change in
(Dollars in thousands)	2009			2008			Contribution			Contribution			2009			2008			Contribution			Contribution
Net interest income:
Banking	$	131,415		$	118,648		$	12,767			11	%
Community banking													$	215,877		$	177,649		$	38,228			22	%
Specialty finance		38,219			34,679			3,540			10			71,950			51,698			20,252			39
Wealth management		13,502			9,290			4,212			45			21,271			13,771			7,500			54
Parent and inter-segment eliminations		(45,857	)		(41,475	)		(4,382	)		11			(84,156	)		(61,296	)		(22,860	)		37

Total net interest income	$	137,279		$	121,142		$	16,137			13	%	$	224,942		$	181,822		$	43,120			24	%


Non-interest income:
Banking	$	51,683		$	41,729		$	9,954			24	%
Community banking													$	70,614		$	55,442		$	15,172			27	%
Specialty finance		1,454			3,176			(1,722	)		(54	)		115,746			4,434			111,312			N/M
Wealth management		17,557			19,762			(2,205	)		(11	)		27,975			28,543			(568	)		(2	)
Parent and inter-segment eliminations		11,185			(6,491	)		17,676		NM				18,224			(8,940	)		27,164			N/M

Total non-interest income	$	81,879		$	58,176		$	23,703			41	%	$	232,559		$	79,479		$	153,080			193	%


Net Revenue (loss):
Community banking													$	286,491		$	233,091		$	53,400			23	%
Specialty finance														187,696			56,132			131,564			N/M
Wealth management														49,246			42,314			6,932			16
Parent and inter-segment eliminations														(65,932	)		(70,236	)		4,304			6

Total net revenue													$	457,501		$	261,301		$	196,200			75	%


Segment profit (loss):
Banking	$	10,507		$	29,505		$	(18,998	)		64	%
Community banking													$	(24,865	)	$	30,869		$	(55,734	)		(181	)%
Specialty finance		16,285			16,621			(336	)		(2	)		136,713			24,502			112,211			N/M
Wealth management		6,850			5,645			1,205			21			11,207			8,053			3,154			39
Parent and inter-segment eliminations		(20,735	)		(30,790	)		10,055			(33	)		(78,153	)		(44,891	)		(33,262	)		74

Total segment profit	$	12,907		$	20,981		$	(8,074	)		(38)	%	$	44,902		$	18,533		$	26,369			142	%

~~In accordance with SFAS 133,~~As required by ASC 815, the Company recognizes all derivative financial instruments in the consolidated financial statements at fair value regardless of the purpose or intent for holding the instrument. Derivative financial instruments are included in other assets or other liabilities, as appropriate, on the Consolidated Statements of Condition. Changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments are either recognized periodically in income or in shareholders’ equity as a component of other comprehensive income depending on whether the derivative financial instrument qualifies for hedge accounting, and if so, whether it qualifies as a fair value hedge or cash flow hedge. Generally, changes in fair values of derivatives accounted for as fair value hedges are recorded in income in the same period and in the same income statement line as changes in the fair values of the hedged items that relate to the hedged risk(s). Changes in fair values of derivative financial instruments accounted for as cash flow hedges, to the extent they are effective hedges, are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income, net of deferred taxes. Changes in fair values of derivative financial instruments not qualifying as hedges pursuant to ~~SFAS 133~~ASC 815 are reported in non-interest income. Interest rate derivative contracts are valued by a third party and are periodically validated by comparison with valuations provided by

The table below presents the fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments as well as their classification on the Consolidated Statements of Condition as of ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008(dollars in thousands):


	Derivative Assets					Derivative Liabilities					Derivative Assets					Derivative Liabilities
	Balance	Fair Value				Balance	Fair Value					Fair Value					Fair Value
	Sheet	June 30,		December 31,		Sheet	June 30,		December 31,
	Location	2009		2008		Location	2009		2008		Balance	September		December		Balance	September		December
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133:
											Sheet	30,		31,		Sheet	30,		31,
											Location	2009		2008		Location	2009		2008
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815:

Interest rate swaps designated as Cash Flow Hedges	Other assets		—		—	Other liabilities	$	14,972	$	19,314	Other assets		—		—	Other liabilities	$	16,252	$	19,314


Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133:
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments underASC 815:

Interest rate derivatives	Other assets	$	7,234	$	9,115	Other liabilities	$	7,167	$	9,294	Other assets	$	8,914	$	9,115	Other liabilities	$	9,262	$	9,294
Interest rate lock commitments	Other assets	$	764	$	56	Other liabilities	$	177	$	386	Other assets	$	2,473	$	56	Other liabilities	$	29	$	386
Forward commitments to sell mortgage loans	Other assets	$	2,281	$	401	Other liabilities	$	801	$	191	Other assets	$	42	$	401	Other liabilities	$	4,255	$	191

Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133		$	10,279	$	9,572		$	8,145	$	9,871

Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815												$	11,429	$	9,572		$	13,546	$	9,871


Total derivatives		$	10,279	$	9,572		$	23,117	$	29,185		$	11,429	$	9,572		$	29,798	$	29,185

Interest Rate Derivatives —The Company has interest rate derivatives, including swaps and option products, resulting from a service the Company provides to certain qualified borrowers. The Company’s banking subsidiaries execute certain derivative products (typically interest rate swaps) directly with qualified commercial borrowers to facilitate their respective risk management strategies. For example, doing so allows the Company’s commercial borrowers to effectively convert a variable rate loan to a fixed rate. In order to minimize the Company’s exposure on these transactions, the Company simultaneously executes offsetting derivatives with third parties. In most cases the offsetting derivatives have mirror-image terms, which result in the positions’ changes in fair value substantially offsetting through earnings each period. However, to the extent that the derivatives are not a mirror-image and because of differences in counterparty credit risk, changes in fair value will not completely offset resulting in some earnings impact each period. Changes in the fair value of these derivatives are included in other non-interest income. At ~~June~~September 30, 2009, the Company had 7690 derivative transactions ~~(38~~(45 with customers and 3845 with third parties) with an aggregate notional amount of ~~$291~~approximately $372.8 million ($~~286~~367.8 million of interest rate swaps and $5.0 million of interest rate options) related to this program. These interest rate derivatives had maturity dates ranging from August 2010 to March 2019.

Mortgage Banking Derivatives —These derivatives include interest rate lock commitments provided to customers to fund certain mortgage loans to be sold into the secondary market and forward commitments for the future delivery of such loans. It is the Company’s practice to enter into forward commitments for the future delivery of residential mortgage loans when interest rate lock commitments are entered into in order to economically hedge the effect of future changes in interest rates on its commitments to fund the loans as well as on its portfolio of mortgage loans held-for-sale. The Company’s mortgage banking derivatives have not been designated as being in ~~SFAS 133~~ hedge relationships. At ~~June~~September 30, 2009 the Company had interest rate lock commitments with an aggregate notional amount of ~~$285~~$381.6 million and forward commitments to sell mortgage loans with an aggregate notional amount of ~~$583~~$569.1 million. The fair values of these derivatives were estimated based on changes in mortgage rates from the dates of the commitments. Changes in the fair value of these mortgage banking derivatives are included in mortgage banking revenue.

Other Derivatives —

Periodically, the Company will sell options to a bank or dealer for the right to purchase certain securities held within the Banks’ investment portfolios (covered call options). These option transactions are designed primarily to increase the total return associated with the investment securities portfolio. These options do not qualify as hedges pursuant to ~~SFAS 133,~~ASC 815, and, accordingly, changes in fair value of these contracts are recognized as other non-interest income. There were no covered call options outstanding as of ~~June~~September 30, 2009, December 31, 2008 or ~~June~~September 30, 2008.

Amounts included in the consolidated statement of income related to derivative instruments not designated in hedge relationships were as follows(dollars in thousands):


												Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
		Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended					September			September			September			September
Derivative	Location in income statement	June 30, 2009			June 30, 2008		June 30, 2009		June 30, 2008		Location in income statement	30, 2009			30, 2008			30, 2009			30, 2008

Interest rate swaps and floors	Other income	$	(140	)	$	64	$	247	$	20	Other income	$	(415	)	$	96		$	(169	)	$	117
Mortgage banking derivatives	Mortgage banking revenue		2,897			451		2,187		478	Mortgage banking revenue		(3,836	)		(352	)		(1,649	)		126
Covered call options	Other income		—			12,083		1,998		18,863	Other income		—			2,723			1,998			21,586

appropriate types and amounts of collateral are obtained to minimize credit exposure.

The Company has agreements with certain of its interest rate derivative counterparties that contain ~~a provision where~~cross-default provisions, which provide that if the Company defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then the Company could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations. The Company also has agreements with certain of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision ~~where~~allowing the counter party to terminate the derivative positions if the Company fails to maintain its status as a well / adequate capitalized institution, ~~then~~which would require the ~~counterparty could terminate the derivative positions and the~~ Company ~~would be required~~ to settle its obligations under the agreements. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2009, the fair value of interest rate derivatives in a net liability position, which includes accrued interest related to these agreements, was ~~$22.6~~$26.4 million. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2009 the Company has minimum collateral posting thresholds with certain of its derivative counterparties and has posted collateral consisting of ~~$7.4~~$6.7 million of cash and ~~$7.3~~$6.8 million of securities. If the Company had breached any of these provisions at ~~June~~September 30, 2009 it would have been required to settle its obligations under the agreements at the termination value and would have been required to pay any additional amounts due in excess of amounts previously posted as collateral with the respective counterparty.

The Company is also exposed to the credit risk of its commercial borrowers who are counterparties to interest rate derivatives with the Banks. This counterparty risk related to the commercial borrowers is managed and monitored through the Banks’ standard underwriting process applicable to loans since these derivatives are secured through collateral provided by the loan agreement. The counterparty risk associated with the mirror-image swaps executed with third parties is monitored and managed in connection with the Company’s overall asset liability management process.

~~(11)~~(15)Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities

Effective January 1, 2008, upon adoption of SFAS No. 157,“Fair Value Measurement”, which is now part of ASC 820, the Company began to group financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the observability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are:

	•		Level 1—unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

	•		Level 2—inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

	•		Level 3 — significant unobservable inputs that reflect the Company’s own assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.

A financial instrument’s categorization within the above valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the assets or liabilities. Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

Available-for-sale and trading account securities— Fair values for available-for-sale and trading account securities are based on quoted market prices when available or through the use of alternative approaches, such as matrix or model pricing or indicators from market makers.

Mortgage loans held-for-sale— Mortgage loans originated by ~~WMC~~Wintrust Mortgage Company on or after January 1, 2008 are carried at fair value. The fair value of mortgage loans held-for-sale is determined by reference to investor price sheets for loan products with similar characteristics.

Mortgage servicing rights— Fair value for mortgage servicing rights is determined utilizing a third party valuation model which stratifies the servicing rights into pools based on product type and interest rate. The fair value of each servicing rights pool is calculated based on the present value of estimated future cash flows using a discount rate commensurate with the risk associated with that pool, given current market conditions. Estimates of fair value include assumptions about prepayment speeds, interest rates and other factors which are subject to change over time.

Derivative instruments— The Company’s derivative instruments include interest rate swaps, commitments to fund

The following tables present the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the periods presented.


	June 30, 2009								September 30, 2009
(Dollars in thousands)	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3

Available-for-sale securities
U.S. Treasury	$	110,928	$	—	$	110,928	$	—	$	112,896	$	—	$	112,896	$	—
U.S. Government agencies		515,232		—		515,232		—		655,024		—		655,024		—
Municipal		58,863		—		50,508		8,355		66,900		—		49,257		17,643
Corporate notes and other debt		62,272		—		57,894		4,378
Corporate notes and other										100,506		—		48,120		52,386
Mortgage-backed		406,330		—		238,954		167,376		390,670		—		226,931		163,739
Equity securities⁽¹⁾		34,633		—		8,952		25,681		28,870		—		3,181		25,689
Trading account securities		22,973		200		1,351		21,422		29,204		208		1,432		27,564
Mortgage loans held-for-sale		291,275		—		291,275		—		187,505		—		187,505		—
Mortgage servicing rights		6,278		—		—		6,278		6,030		—		—		6,030
Nonqualified deferred compensation assets		2,461		—		2,461		—		2,660		—		2,660		—
Derivative assets		10,279		—		10,279		—		11,429		—		11,429		—
Retained interests from the sale of premium finance receivables		—		—		—		—
Retained interests from the sale/securitization of premium finance receivables										43,958		—		—		43,958

Total	$	1,521,524	$	200	$	1,287,834	$	233,490	$	1,635,652	$	208	$	1,298,435	$	337,009


Derivative liabilities	$	23,117	$	—	$	23,117	$	—	$	29,799	$	—	$	29,798	$	—

The changes in Level 3 available-for-sale securities measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 are summarized as follows:


							Corporate														Corporate
	U.S. Govt.						notes and		Mortgage			Equity			U.S. Govt.						notes and		Mortgage-			Equity
(Dollars in thousands)	agencies			Municipal			other debt		-backed			securities			agencies			Municipal			other debt		backed			securities
Balance at March 31, 2009	$	109		$	17,096		$	4,374	$	175,475		$	25,872
Balance at June 30, 2009															$	—		$	8,355		$	4,378	$	167,376		$	25,681
Total net gains (losses) included in:
Net income⁽¹⁾		—			—			4		—			—			—			(112	)		4		—			—
Other comprehensive income		—			—			—		(134	)		—			—			—			—		5,045			—
Purchases, issuances and settlements, net		—			(6,592	)		—		(7,965	)		—			—			9,400			48,004		(8,682	)		8
Net transfers into/(out) of Level 3		(109	)		(2,149	)		—		—			(191	)		—			—			—		—			—

Balance at June 30, 2009	$	—		$	8,355		$	4,378	$	167,376		$	25,681
Balance at September 30, 2009															$	—		$	17,643		$	52,386	$	163,739		$	25,689


Balance at January 1, 2009	$	110		$	9,373		$	1,395	$	4,010		$	26,104		$	110		$	9,373		$	1,395	$	4,010		$	26,104
Total net gains included in:
Net income⁽¹⁾		—			—			4		—			—			—			(112	)		8		—			—
Other comprehensive income		(1	)		—			—		(1,447	)		—			(1	)		—			—		3,598			—
Purchases, issuances and settlements, net		—			1,131			2,979		164,813			35			—			10,531			50,983		156,131			43
Net transfers into/(out) of Level 3		(109	)		(2,149	)		—		—			(458	)		(109	)		(2,149	)		—		—			(458	)

Balance at June 30, 2009	$	—		$	8,355		$	4,378	$	167,376		$	25,681
Balance at September 30, 2009															$	—		$	17,643		$	52,386	$	163,739		$	25,689

The changes in Level 3 for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008 are summarized as follows:


	Available-			Mortgage					Available-			Trading		Mortgage
	for-sale			servicing		Retained			for-sale			account		servicing			Retained
(Dollars in thousands)	securities			rights		Interests			securities			securities		rights			Interests
Balance at March 31, 2008	$	195,349		$	4,371	$	5,703
Balance at June 30, 2008									$	149,188		$	125	$	4,896		$	5,264
Total net gains (losses) included in:
Net income⁽¹⁾		—			525		1,898			—			—		(42	)		875
Other comprehensive income		—			—		—			—			—		—			—
Purchases, issuances and settlements, net		107,307			—		(2,337	)		9,593			50		—			(3,152	)
Net transfers into/(out) of Level 3		(153,468	)		—		—			(110,069	)		—		—			—

Balance at June 30, 2008	$	149,188		$	4,896	$	5,264
Balance at September 30, 2008									$	48,712		$	175	$	4,854		$	2,987


Balance at January 1, 2008	$	95,514		$	4,730	$	4,480		$	95,514		$	25	$	4,730		$	4,480
Total net gains included in:
Net income⁽¹⁾		—			166		4,853			—			—		124			5,728
Other comprehensive income		—			—		—			—			—		—			—
Purchases, issuances and settlements, net		210,714			—		(4,069	)		220,307			150		—			(7,221	)
Net transfers into/(out) of Level 3		(157,040	)		—		—			(267,109	)		—		—			—

Balance at June 30, 2008	$	149,188		$	4,896	$	5,264
Balance at September 30, 2008									$	48,712		$	175	$	4,854		$	2,987

Other real estate owned— Other real estate owned is comprised of real estate acquired in partial or full satisfaction of loans and is included in other assets. Other real estate owned is recorded at its estimated fair value less estimated selling costs at the date of transfer, with any excess of the related loan balance over the fair value less expected selling costs charged to the allowance for loan losses. Subsequent changes in value are reported as adjustments to the carrying amount and are recorded in other non-interest expense. Gains and losses upon sale, if any, are also charged to other non-interest expense. Fair value is generally based on third party appraisals and internal estimates and is therefore considered a Level 3 valuation.

In accordance with SFAS No. 107, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (“SFAS 107”), as amended by FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments,”ASC 825, on a quarterly basis the Company is now required to report the fair value of all financial instruments on the consolidated statement of condition, including those financial instruments carried at cost. The fair value estimates, methods and assumptions set forth below for the Company’s financial instruments are made solely to comply with the requirements of ~~SFAS 107~~ASC 825 and should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes included in this quarterly report. The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at ~~June~~September 30, 2009 ~~and~~ and December 31, 2008 were as follows:


	At June 30, 2009				At December 31, 2008				At September 30, 2009				At December 31, 2008
	Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair
(Dollars in thousands)	Value		Value		Value		Value		Value		Value		Value		Value

Financial Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	163,832		163,832		445,904		445,904	$	151,761		151,761		445,904		445,904
Interest bearing deposits with banks		655,759		655,759		123,009		123,009		1,168,362		1,168,362		123,009		123,009
Available-for-sale securities		1,267,410		1,267,410		784,673		784,673		1,434,248		1,434,248		784,673		784,673
Trading account securities		22,973		22,973		4,399		4,399		29,204		29,204		4,399		4,399
Brokerage customer receivables		17,701		17,701		17,901		17,901		19,441		19,441		17,901		17,901
Mortgage loans held-for-sale, at fair value		291,275		291,275		51,029		51,029		187,505		187,505		51,029		51,029
Loans held-for-sale, at lower of cost or market		529,825		529,912		10,087		10,207		5,750		5,808		10,087		10,207
Loans, net of unearned income		7,595,476		7,745,854		7,621,069		7,988,028		8,275,257		8,503,841		7,621,069		7,988,028
Mortgage servicing rights		6,278		6,278		3,990		3,990		6,030		6,030		3,990		3,990
Nonqualified deferred compensation assets		2,461		2,461		2,279		2,279		2,660		2,660		2,279		2,279
Retained interests from the sale of premium finance receivables		—		—		1,229		1,229
Retained interests from the sale/securitization of premium finance receivables										43,958		43,958		1,229		1,229
Derivative assets		10,279		10,279		9,572		9,572		11,429		11,429		9,572		9,572
Accrued interest receivable and other		118,659		118,659		114,737		114,737		134,807		134,807		114,737		114,737

Total financial assets	$	10,681,928		10,832,393		9,189,878		9,556,957	$	11,470,412		11,699,054		9,189,878		9,556,957


Financial Liabilities:
Non-maturity deposits	$	4,625,937		4,625,937		3,976,003		3,976,003	$	5,004,564		5,004,564		3,976,003		3,976,003
Deposits with stated maturities		4,565,395		4,610,496		4,400,747		4,432,388		4,842,599		4,897,407		4,400,747		4,432,388
Notes payable		1,000		1,000		1,000		1,000		1,000		1,000		1,000		1,000
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		435,980		451,392		435,981		484,528		433,983		450,038		435,981		484,528
Subordinated notes		65,000		65,000		70,000		70,000		65,000		65,000		70,000		70,000
Other borrowings		244,286		244,286		336,764		336,764		252,071		252,071		336,764		336,764
Junior subordinated debentures		249,493		278,440		249,515		205,252		249,493		248,448		249,515		205,252
Derivative liabilities		23,117		23,117		29,185		29,185		29,798		29,798		29,185		29,185
Accrued interest payable		18,602		18,602		18,533		18,533		20,246		20,246		18,533		18,533

Total financial liabilities	$	10,228,810		10,318,270		9,517,728		9,553,653	$	10,898,754		10,968,572		9,517,728		9,553,653

Brokerage customer receivables.The carrying value of brokerage customer receivables approximates fair value due to the relatively short period of time to repricing of variable interest rates.

Loans held-for-sale, at lower of cost or market.Fair value is based on either quoted prices for the same or similar loans, or values obtained from third parties, or is estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics.

Loans.Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Loans are analyzed by type such as commercial, residential real estate, etc. Each category is further segmented by interest rate type (fixed and variable) and term. For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently, estimated fair values are based on carrying values. The fair value of residential loans is based on secondary market sources for securities backed by similar loans, adjusted for differences in loan characteristics. The fair value for other fixed rate loans is estimated by discounting scheduled cash flows through the estimated maturity using estimated market discount rates that reflect credit and interest rate risks inherent in the loan. The primary impact of credit risk on the present value of the loan portfolio, however, was accommodated through the use of the allowance for loan losses, which is believed to represent the current fair value of probable incurred losses for purposes of the fair value calculation.

Accrued interest receivable and accrued interest payable.The carrying values of accrued interest receivable and accrued interest payable approximate market values due to the relatively short period of time to expected realization.

Deposit liabilities.The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as non-interest bearing deposits, savings, NOW accounts and money market accounts, is equal to the amount payable on demand as of period-end (i.e. the carrying value). The fair value of certificates of deposit is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using the rates currently in effect for deposits of similar remaining maturities.

Notes payable.The carrying value of notes payable approximates fair value due to the relatively short period of time to repricing of variable interest rates.

Federal Home Loan Bank advances.The fair value of Federal Home Loan Bank advances is obtained from the Federal Home Loan Bank which uses a discounted cash flow analysis based on current market rates of similar maturity debt securities to discount cash flows.

Subordinated notes.The carrying value of the subordinated notes payable approximates fair value due to the relatively short period of time to repricing of variable interest rates.

Other borrowings.Carrying value of other borrowings approximates fair value due to the relatively short period of time to maturity or repricing.

Junior subordinated debentures.The fair value of the junior subordinated debentures is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows.

2632

~~(12)~~(16)~~Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets~~

~~A summary of the Company’s goodwill assets by business segment is presented in the following table:~~

January 1, Goodwill Impairment June 30,
(Dollars in thousands) 2009 Acquired Losses 2009
Banking $ 245,886 $ 215 $ — $ 246,101
Premium finance 16,095 — — 16,095
Wealth management 14,329 — — 14,329

Total $ 276,310 $ 215 $ — $ 276,525

The increase in the Banking segment’s goodwill in the first six months of 2009 relates to additional contingent consideration paid to the former owners of WestAmerica and Guardian as a result of attaining certain performance measures. This was the final payment of contingent consideration due as a result of the Company’s 2004 acquisition of WestAmerica and Guardian.

~~A summary of finite-lived intangible assets as of June 30, 2009, December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008 and the expected amortization as of June 30, 2009 is as follows (in thousands):~~

June 30, December 31, June 30,
2009 2008 2008

Wealth management segment:

Customer list intangibles

Gross carrying amount $ 3,252 3,252 3,252
Accumulated amortization (3,165 ) (3,079 ) (2,942 )

Net carrying amount 87 173 310

Banking segment:

Core deposit intangibles

Gross carrying amount 27,918 27,918 27,918
Accumulated amortization (14,761 ) (13,483 ) (12,058 )

Net carrying amount 13,157 14,435 15,860

Total other intangible assets, net
$ 13,244 14,608 16,170

Estimated amortization

Actual in 6 months ended June 30, 2009 $ 1,363
Estimated remaining in 2009 1,354
Estimated — 2010 2,381
Estimated — 2011 2,253
Estimated — 2012 2,251
Estimated — 2013 2,235

The customer list intangibles recognized in connection with the acquisitions of LFCM in 2003 and WHAMC in 2002 are being amortized over seven-year periods on an accelerated basis. The core deposit intangibles recognized in connection with the Company’s seven bank acquisitions between 2003 and 2006 are being amortized over ten-year periods on an accelerated basis. Amortization expense associated with finite-lived intangibles totaled approximately $1.4 million and $1.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

~~(13)~~Stock-Based Compensation Plans

The 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (“the 2007 Plan”), which was approved by the Company’s shareholders in January 2007, permits the grant of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, rights and restricted stock, as well as the conversion of outstanding options of acquired companies to Wintrust options. The 2007 Plan initially provided for the issuance of up to 500,000 shares of common stock, and in May 2009 the Company’s shareholders approved an additional 325,000 shares of common stock that may be offered under the 2007 Plan. All grants made in 2007, 2008 and 2009 were made pursuant to the 2007 Plan. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2009, ~~431,318~~409,470 shares were available for future grant. The 2007 Plan replaced the Wintrust Financial Corporation 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (“the 1997 Plan”) which had substantially similar terms. The 2007 Plan and the 1997 Plan are collectively referred to as “the Plans.” The Plans cover substantially all employees of Wintrust.

The Company typically awards stock-based compensation in the form of stock options and restricted share awards. Stock options typically provide the holder the option to purchase shares of Wintrust’s common stock at the fair market value of the stock on the date the options are granted. Options generally vest ratably over a five-year period and expire at such time as the Compensation Committee determines at the time of grant. The 2007 Plan provides for a maximum term of seven years from the date of grant while the 1997 Plan provided for a maximum term of ten years. Restricted shares entitle the holders to receive, at no cost, shares of the Company’s common stock. Restricted shares generally vest over periods of one to five years from the date of grant. Holders of the restricted shares are not entitled to vote or receive cash dividends (or cash payments equal to the cash dividends) on the underlying common shares until the awards are vested. Except in limited circumstances, these awards are canceled upon termination of employment without any payment of consideration by the Company.

Compensation cost charged to income for stock options was ~~$862,000~~$830,000 and ~~$1.3~~$1.2 million in the ~~second~~third quarters of 2009 and 2008, respectively, and ~~$1.8~~$2.6 million and ~~$2.4~~$3.6 million for the year-to-date periods of 2009 and 2008, respectively. Compensation cost charged to income for restricted shares was ~~$797,000~~$872,000 in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 and ~~$1.2~~$1.5 million in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008, and ~~$1.7~~$2.6 million and ~~$2.5~~$4.0 million for the year-to-date periods of 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Stock based compensation is recognized based upon the number of awards that are ultimately expected to vest. As a result, recognized compensation expense for stock options and restricted share awards was reduced for estimated forfeitures prior to vesting. Forfeiture rates are estimated for each type of award based on historical forfeiture experience. Estimated forfeitures will be reassessed in subsequent periods and may change based on new facts and circumstances.

Stock-based compensation cost is measured as the fair value of an award on the date of grant and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. The fair value of restricted shares is determined based on the average of the high and low trading prices on the grant date. The fair value of stock options is estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model that utilizes the assumptions outlined in the following table. Option-pricing models require the input of highly subjective assumptions and are sensitive to changes in the option’s expected life and the price volatility of the underlying stock, which can materially affect the fair value estimate. Expected life is based on historical exercise and termination behavior as well as the term of the option, and expected stock price volatility is based on historical volatility of the Company’s common stock, which correlates with the expected term of the options. The risk-free interest rate is based on comparable U.S. Treasury rates. Management reviews and adjusts the assumptions used to calculate the fair value of an option on a periodic basis to better reflect expected trends. The following table presents the weighted average assumptions used to determine the fair value of options granted in the ~~six~~nine months ending ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008:


	For the Six Months Ended						For the Nine Months Ended
	June 30, 2009			June 30, 2008			September 30, 2009			September 30, 2008
Expected dividend yield		2.2	%		1.1	%		2.0	%		1.1	%
Expected volatility		44.6	%		32.4	%		45.7	%		32.4	%
Risk-free rate		2.2	%		3.3	%		2.4	%		3.3	%
Expected option life (in years)		6.0			6.7			5.9			6.7

~~(14)~~(17)Shareholders’ Equity and Earnings Per Share

Series A Preferred Stock

In August 2008, the Company issued and sold 50,000 shares of non-cumulative perpetual convertible preferred stock, Series A, liquidation preference $1,000 per share (the “Series A Preferred Stock”) for $50 million in a private transaction. If declared, dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock are payable quarterly in arrears at a rate of 8.00% per annum. The Series A Preferred Stock is convertible into common stock at the option of the holder at a conversion rate of 38.88 shares of common stock per share of Series A Preferred Stock. On and after August 26, 2010, the Series A Preferred Stock will be subject to mandatory conversion into common stock in connection with a fundamental transaction, or on and after August 26, 2013 if the closing price of the Company’s common stock exceeds a certain amount.

Series B Preferred Stock

Pursuant to the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s (the “U.S. Treasury”) Capital Purchase Program, on December 19, 2008, the Company issued to the U.S. Treasury, in exchange for aggregate consideration of $250 million, (i) 250,000 shares of the Company’s fixed rate cumulative perpetual preferred Stock, Series B, liquidation preference $1,000 per share (the “Series B Preferred Stock”), and (ii) a warrant to purchase 1,643,295 shares of Wintrust common stock at a per share exercise price of $22.82 and with a term of 10 years. The Series B Preferred Stock will pay a cumulative dividend at a coupon rate of 5% for the first five years and 9% thereafter. ~~This investment~~The Series B Preferred Stock can, with the approval of the Federal Reserve, be redeemed.

The relative fair values of the preferred stock and the warrant issued to the U.S. Treasury in conjunction with the Company’s participation in the Capital Purchase Program were determined through an analysis, as of the valuation date of December 19, 2008, of the fair value of the warrants and the fair value of the preferred stock, and an allocation of the relative fair value of each to the $250 million of total proceeds.

The fair value of the warrant was determined using a binomial lattice valuation model. The assumptions used in arriving at the fair value of the warrant using that valuation method, derived as of the valuation date, were as follows:


Company stock price as of the valuation date	$	20.06
Contractual strike price of warrant	$	22.82
Expected term based on contractual term	10 years
Expected volatility based on 10-year historical volatility of the Company’s stock		37	%
Expected annual dividend yield		1	%
Risk-free rate based on 10-year U.S. Treasury strip rate		2.72	%

Using that model, each of the 1,643,295 shares underlying the warrant was valued at $8.33 and, correspondingly, the aggregate fair value of the warrant was $13.7 million.

The fair value of the preferred stock was determined using a discounted cash flow model which discounted the contractual principal balance of $250 million and the contractual dividend payment of 5% for the first five years at a 13% discount rate. The discount rate was derived from the average and median yields on existing fixed rate preferred stock issuances of eleven different commercial banks in the central United States, which average and median results approximated 13% on the date of valuation. Using this methodology, the fair value of the preferred stock was estimated to be $181.8 million.

In relative terms, a summary of the above valuation is as follows:


		Relative
	Amount	Fair Value
Fair value of preferred stock	$181.8 million		93.0	%
Fair value of warrants	$ 13.7 million		7.0	%

Total fair value	$195.5 million		100.0	%

Applying the relative value percentages of 93% for the preferred stock and 7% for the warrants to the total proceeds of $250 million, the resulting valuation of the preferred stock and warrants is as follows:


Proceeds allocated to Preferred Stock ($250 million multiplied by 93%)		$232.5 million
Proceeds allocated to Warrants ($250 million multiplied by 7%)		$17.5 million

For as long as any shares of Series B Preferred Stock are outstanding, the ability of the Company to declare or pay dividends or distributions on, or purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire for consideration, shares of its common stock or other securities, including trust preferred securities, will be subject to restrictions. The U.S. Treasury’s consent is required for any increase in common dividends per share from the amount of the Company’s semiannual cash dividend of $0.18 per share, until the third anniversary of the purchase agreement with the U.S. Treasury unless prior to such third anniversary the Series B Preferred Stock is redeemed in whole or the U.S. Treasury has transferred all of the Series B Preferred Stock to third parties.

~~In August 2008, the Company issued for $50 million, 50,000 shares of non-cumulative perpetual convertible preferred stock, Series A, liquidation preference $1,000~~Earnings per share (the “Series A Preferred Stock”) in a private transaction. If declared, dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock are payable quarterly in arrears at a rate of 8.00% per annum. The Series A Preferred Stock is convertible into common stock at the option of the holder at a conversion rate of 38.88 shares of common stock per share of Series A Preferred Stock. On and after August 26, 2010, the preferred stock will be subject to mandatory conversion into common stock under certain circumstances.Share

The following table shows the computation of basic and diluted ~~EPS~~earnings per share for the periods indicated:


			For the Three Months				For the Six Months						For the Three Months					For the Nine Months
			Ended June 30,				Ended June 30,						Ended September 30,					Ended September 30,
(In thousands, except per share data)			2009		2008		2009		2008				2009		2008			2009		2008
Net income			$	6,549	$	11,276	$	12,907	$	20,981
Preferred stock dividends and discount accretion				5,000		—		10,000		—
Net income (loss)													$	31,995	$	(2,448	)	$	44,902	$	18,533
Less: Preferred stock dividends and discount accretion														4,668		544			14,668		544

Net income applicable to common shares	(A	)		1,549		11,276		2,907		20,981
Net income applicable to common shares — Basic											(A	)		27,327		(2,992	)		30,234		17,989
Add: Dividends on convertible preferred stock														1,000		—			—		—

Net income applicable to common shares — Diluted											(B	)		28,327		(2,992	)		30,234		17,989


Average common shares outstanding	(B	)		23,964		23,608		23,910		23,563	(C	)		24,052		23,644			23,958		23,590
Effect of dilutive potential common shares				300		531		269		555				2,493		—			323		525

Weighted average common shares and effect of dilutive potential common shares	(C	)		24,264		24,139		24,179		24,118	(D	)		26,545		23,644			24,281		24,115


Net income per common share:
Basic	(A/B	)	$	0.06	$	0.48	$	0.12	$	0.89	(A/C	)	$	1.14	$	(0.13	)	$	1.26	$	0.76

Diluted	(A/C	)	$	0.06	$	0.47	$	0.12	$	0.87	(B/D	)	$	1.07	$	(0.13	)	$	1.25	$	0.75

~~(15)~~(18)Subsequent Events

OnAs discussed in Note 3 — Business Combinations, on July 28, 2009, FIFC ~~entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with American International Group, Inc. (“AIG”), pursuant to which FIFC~~ purchased of a ~~portfolio~~majority of ~~domestic~~the U.S. life insurance premium finance ~~loans with an aggregate unpaid principal balance~~assets of ~~approximately $941.3 million (the “Loan Portfolio”) and certain related assets from~~ A.I. Credit Corp. and A.I. Credit Consumer Discount Company, ~~each an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary~~subsidiaries of AIG (collectively, “A.I. Credit”), for an aggregate purchase price of $679.5 million, subject to post-closing adjustments. The purchase price is subject to a customary post-closing adjustment based on the value of the Loan Portfolio as of the closing date. FIFC can purchase up toAmerican International Group, Inc. At that time, an aggregate of $84.4 million of additional life insurance premium finance assets were available for ~~up to $61.2 million in the~~ future purchase by FIFC subject to satisfying certain conditions. On October 2, 2009, the conditions were satisfied in relation to the majority of the additional life insurance premium finance assets which were available for purchase and FIFC purchased $83.4 million of the $84.4 million of life insurance premium finance assets available for an aggregate purchase price of $60.5 million. The Company anticipates recording an additional $14.5 million bargain purchase gain relating to this additional purchase, all of which will be immediately recognizable in the fourth quarter. The difference between the fair value of these loans acquired on October 2, 2009 and the outstanding principal balance of theses loans represents a discount of $8.4 million and is comprised of two components, an accretable component totaling $5.7 million and a non-accretable component totaling $2.7 million. The impact related to this transaction will be included in Wintrust’s consolidated financial results only since the effective date of acquisition.

On October 30, 2009, the Company established a $25 million revolving credit facility and a $1 million term facility, the terms of which are set forth in an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of October 30, 2009 (the “Credit Agreement”) among Wintrust, the lenders named therein, and an unaffiliated bank as administrative agent. The Credit Agreement replaces Wintrust’s prior credit agreement with an unaffiliated bank. All borrowings under the revolving credit facility must be repaid by October 29, 2010. All borrowings under the term facility must be repaid by June 1, 2015. As of the date hereof, Wintrust has no outstanding balance under the revolving credit facility and has $1 million outstanding under the term facility. Borrowings under the Credit Agreement are available for general corporate purposes and are secured by pledges of and first priority perfected security interests in the Company’s equity interest in certain of its bank subsidiaries.

3137

ITEM 2

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL

CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of financial condition as of ~~June~~September 30, 2009, compared with December 31, 2008 and ~~June~~September 30, 2008, and the results of operations for the ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008, should be read in conjunction with the ~~Company’s~~our unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes contained in this report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties and, as such, future results could differ significantly from management’s current expectations. See the last section of this discussion for further information on forward-looking statements.

~~Overview and Strategy~~Introduction

Wintrust is a financial holding company ~~providing~~that provides traditional community banking services, ~~as well as a full array of wealth management services to customers~~primarily in the Chicago metropolitan area and ~~southern Wisconsin. Additionally, the Company~~southeastern Wisconsin, and operates other financing businesses on a national basis through several non-bank subsidiaries. Additionally, Wintrust offers a full array of wealth management services primarily to customers in the Chicago metropolitan area and southeastern Wisconsin.

Overview

Community Banking

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2009, ~~the Company’s~~our community banking franchise consisted of 15 community banks (the ~~“Banks”~~“banks”) with 7978 locations. Through these banks, we provide banking and financial services primarily to individuals, small to mid-sized businesses, local governmental units and institutional clients residing primarily in the banks’ local service areas. These services include traditional deposit products such as demand, NOW, money market, savings and time deposit accounts, as well as a number of unique deposit products targeted to specific market segments. The ~~Company developed its~~banks also offer home equity, home mortgage, consumer, real estate and commercial loans, safe deposit facilities, ATMs, internet banking and other innovative and traditional services specially tailored to meet the needs of customers in their market areas.

Profitability of our community banking franchise ~~through~~is primarily driven by our net interest income and margin, our funding mix and related costs, the level of non-performing loans and other real estate owned, the amount of mortgage banking revenue and our history of establishingde novo ~~organization~~banks.

Net interest income and margin.The primary source of ~~nine banks (55 locations)~~the our revenue is net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between interest income and fees on earning assets, such as loans and securities, and interest expense on liabilities to fund those assets, including deposits and other borrowings. Net interest income can change significantly from period to period based on general levels of interest rates, customer prepayment patterns, the mix of interest-earning assets and the mix of interest-bearing and non-interest bearing deposits and borrowings.

Funding mix and related costs. Our most significant source of funding is core deposits, which are comprised of non-interest-bearing deposits, non-brokered interest-bearing transaction accounts, savings deposits and domestic time deposits. Our branch network is our principal source of core deposits, which generally carry lower interest rates than wholesale funds of comparable maturities. Our profitability has been bolstered in recent quarters as fixed term certificates of deposit have been renewing at lower rates given the historically low interest rate levels in place recently and particularly since the fourth quarter of 2008.

Level of non-performing loans and other real estate owned. The level of non-performing loans and other real estate owned can significantly impact our profitability as these loans do not accrue any income, can be subject to charge-offs and write-downs due to deteriorating market conditions and generally result in additional legal and collections expenses. Given the current economic conditions, these costs have been trending higher in recent quarters.

Mortgage banking revenue. Our community banking franchise is also influenced by the level of fees generated by the origination of residential mortgages and the sale of such mortgages into the secondary market. This revenue is significantly impacted by the level of interest rates associated with home mortgages. Recently, such interest rates have been historically low and customer refinancings have been high, resulting in increased fee revenue. Additionally, in December 2008, we acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of the mortgage banking business of Professional Mortgage Partners (“PMP”) for an initial cash purchase price of ~~seven banks, one~~$1.4 million, plus potential contingent consideration of ~~which was merged into another~~up to $1.5 million per year in each of the following three years dependent upon reaching certain earnings thresholds. As a result of the acquisition, we significantly increased the capacity of our ~~banks, with 24 locations. Wintrust’s first bank was organized~~mortgage-origination operations, primarily in ~~December 1991, as~~the Chicago metropolitan market. The PMP transaction also changed the mix of our mortgage origination business in the Chicago market, resulting in a ~~highly personal service-oriented community bank. Each~~relatively greater portion of that business being retail, rather than wholesale, oriented. The primary risk of the ~~banks organized or acquired since then share that same commitment~~PMP acquisition transaction relates to ~~community banking. The~~the integration of a significant number of locations and staff members into our existing mortgage operation during a period of increased mortgage refinancing activity. Costs in the mortgage business are variable as they primarily relate to commissions paid to originators.

Establishment of de novo operations. Our historical financial performance ~~of the Company~~ has been affected by costs associated with growing market share in deposits and loans, establishing and acquiring banks, opening new branch facilities and building an experienced management team. ~~The Company’s~~Our financial performance generally reflects the improved profitability of ~~its~~our banking subsidiaries as they mature, offset by the costs of establishing and acquiring banks and opening new branch facilities. From ~~the Company’s~~our experience, it generally takes over 13 months for new banks to achieve operational profitability depending on the number and timing of branch facilities added.

~~The following table presents~~In determining the ~~Banks in chronological order based on the date in which they joined Wintrust. Each~~timing of the ~~Banks has~~formation ofde novobanks, the opening of additional branches of existing banks, and the acquisition of additional banks, we consider many factors, particularly our perceived ability to obtain an adequate return on our invested capital driven largely by the then existing cost of funds and lending margins, the general economic climate and the level of competition in a given market. We began to slow the rate of growth of new locations in 2007 due to tightening net interest margins on new business which, in the opinion of management, did not provide enough net interest spread to be able to garner a sufficient return on our invested capital. Since the second quarter of 2008, we have not established ~~additional full-service~~a new banking ~~facilities subsequent~~location either through ade novoopening or through an acquisition, due to ~~their initial openings.~~


	~~De novo~~~~/ Acquired~~	~~Date~~
~~Lake Forest Bank~~	~~De novo~~	~~December, 1991~~
~~Hinsdale Bank~~	~~De novo~~	~~October, 1993~~
~~North Shore Bank~~	~~De novo~~	~~September, 1994~~
~~Libertyville Bank~~	~~De novo~~	~~October, 1995~~
~~Barrington Bank~~	~~De novo~~	~~December, 1996~~
~~Crystal Lake Bank~~	~~De novo~~	~~December, 1997~~
~~Northbrook Bank~~	~~De novo~~	~~November, 2000~~
~~Advantage Bank~~~~(organized 2001)~~	~~Acquired~~	~~October, 2003~~
~~Village Bank~~~~(organized 1995)~~	~~Acquired~~	~~December, 2003~~
~~Beverly Bank~~	~~De novo~~	~~April, 2004~~
~~Wheaton Bank~~~~(formerly Northview Bank; organized 1993)~~	~~Acquired~~	~~September, 2004~~
~~Town Bank~~~~(organized 1998)~~	~~Acquired~~	~~October, 2004~~
~~State Bank of The Lakes~~~~(organized 1894)~~	~~Acquired~~	~~January, 2005~~
~~First Northwest Bank~~~~(organized 1995; merged into Village Bank in May 2005)~~	~~Acquired~~	~~March, 2005~~
~~Old Plank Trail Bank~~	~~De novo~~	~~March, 2006~~
~~St. Charles Bank~~~~(formerly Hinsbrook Bank; organized 1987)~~	~~Acquired~~	~~May, 2006~~

~~There~~the financial system crisis and recessionary economy and our decision to utilize our capital to support our existing franchise rather than deploy our capital for expansion through new locations which tend to operate at a loss in the early months of operation. Thus, while expansion activity during the past three years has been noat a level below earlier periods in our history, we expect to resumede novobank openings, formation of additional branches and acquisitions of additional banks when favorable market conditions return.

In addition to the factors considered above, before we engage in expansion ~~activity~~throughde novobranches or banks we must first make a determination that the expansion fulfills our objective of enhancing shareholder value through potential future earnings growth and enhancement of the ~~Company’s banking~~overall franchise ~~since June 30, 2008.~~

~~Management’s ongoing focus is to balance further asset growth with earnings growth by seeking to more fully leverage the existing capacity within each~~value of the ~~operating subsidiaries. One aspect of this strategy is to continue to pursue specialized earning asset niches~~Company. Generally, we believe that, in ~~order to maintain the mix of earning assets in higher-yielding loans as well as diversify the loan portfolio. Another aspect of this strategy~~normal market conditions, expansion throughde novogrowth is a ~~continued focus on~~better long-term investment than acquiring banks because the cost to bring ade novolocation to profitability is generally substantially less ~~aggressive deposit pricing at~~than the ~~Banks with significant~~premium paid for the acquisition of a healthy bank. Each opportunity to expand is unique from a cost and benefit perspective. Factors including the valuation of our stock, other economic market ~~share~~conditions, the size and ~~more established customer bases.~~scope of the particular expansion opportunity and competitive landscape all influence the decision to expand viade novogrowth or through acquisition.

~~Niche Lending~~Specialty Finance

~~The Company conducts its niche lending~~Through our specialty finance segment, we offer financing of insurance premiums for businesses and individuals; accounts receivable financing, value-added, out-sourced administrative services; and other specialty finance businesses. We conduct our specialty finance businesses through indirect non-bank ~~subsidiaries and divisions of its Banks.~~

subsidiaries. Our wholly owned subsidiary, First Insurance Funding Corporation (“FIFC”) isengages in the ~~Company’s~~premium finance receivables business, our most significant specialized ~~earning asset~~lending niche, ~~originating~~including commercial insurance premium finance and life insurance premium finance.

Financing of Commercial Insurance Premiums

FIFC originated approximately ~~$1.1 billion~~$900 million in ~~loan (premium~~commercial insurance premium finance ~~receivables)~~receivables during the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009. FIFC makes loans to businesses to finance the insurance premiums they pay on their commercial insurance policies. The loans are originated by FIFC working through independent medium and large insurance agents and brokers located throughout the United States. The insurance premiums financed are primarily for commercial customers’ purchases of liability, property and casualty and other commercial insurance.

This lending involves relatively rapid turnover of the loan portfolio and high volume of loan originations. Because of the indirect nature of this lending and because the borrowers are located nationwide, this segment may be more susceptible to third party fraud than relationship lending; however, management has established various control procedures to mitigate the risks associated with this lending. The majority of these loans are purchased by the ~~Banks~~banks in order to more fully utilize their lending capacity as these loans generally provide the ~~Banks~~banks with higher yields than alternative investments. ~~However, excess~~Historically, FIFC originations ~~over~~that were not purchased by the ~~capacity to retain such loans within the Banks’ loan portfolios may be~~banks were sold to unrelated third parties with servicing retained.

~~On November 1, 2007,~~ However, during the third quarter of 2009, FIFC ~~acquired Broadway~~initially sold $695 million in commercial premium finance receivables to our indirect subsidiary, FIFC Premium Funding ~~Corporation (“Broadway”). Broadway~~I, LLC, which in turn sold $600 million in aggregate principal amount of notes backed by such premium finance receivables in a securitization transaction sponsored by FIFC.

The primary driver of profitability related to the financing of commercial insurance premiums is the net interest spread that FIFC can produce between the yields on the loans generated and the cost of funds allocated to the business unit. The commercial insurance premium finance business is a ~~commercial finance company that specializes in financing insurance premiums for corporate entities. Its products~~competitive industry and yields on loans are ~~marketed~~influenced by the market rates offered by our competitors. We fund these loans either through ~~insurance agents and brokers to their small to mid-size corporate clients primarily~~the securitization facility described above or through our deposits, the cost of which is influenced by competitors in the ~~northeastern United States~~retail banking markets in the Chicago and ~~California. On October 1, 2008, Broadway merged with its parent, FIFC, but continues to utilize the Broadway brand in serving its segment~~Milwaukee metropolitan areas.

Financing of ~~the marketplace.~~Life Insurance Premiums

In 2007, FIFC began financing life insurance policy premiums generally for high net-worth individuals. These loans are originated ~~through~~directly with the borrowers with assistance from life insurance carriers, independent insurance agents, ~~with assistance from~~ financial advisors and legal counsel. The life insurance policy is the primary form of collateral. In addition, these loans ~~can be~~often are secured with a letter of credit, marketable securities or ~~certificate~~certificates of deposit.

On In some cases, FIFC may make a loan that has a partially unsecured position. In July ~~28,~~ 2009, FIFC ~~entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with American International Group, Inc. (“AIG”), pursuant to which FIFC~~expanded this niche lending business segment when it purchased a portfolio of domestic life insurance premium finance loans from certain affiliates of American International Group for an aggregate purchase price of $685.3 million. At closing, a portion of the portfolio, with an aggregate unpaid principal balance of approximately ~~$941.3~~$321.1 million, ~~(the “Loan Portfolio”)~~ and ~~certain related assets from A.I. Credit Corp. and A.I. Credit Consumer Discount Company, each an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary~~a corresponding portion of ~~AIG (collectively, “A.I. Credit”), for an aggregate~~the purchase price of ~~$679.5~~approximately $232.8 million ~~subject~~were placed in escrow, pending the receipt of required third party consents.

As with the commercial premium finance business, the primary driver of profitability related to ~~post-closing adjustments. The purchase price~~the financing of life insurance premiums is ~~subject to a customary post-closing adjustment based~~the net interest spread that FIFC can produce between the yields on the ~~value~~loans generated and the cost of funds allocated to the ~~Loan Portfolio as~~business unit.

Profitability of ~~the closing date. FIFC can purchase up to an aggregate of $84.4 million of additional~~financing both commercial and life insurance ~~premium finance assets for up to $61.2 million in the future subject to satisfying certain conditions.~~

~~Tricom Inc. (“Tricom”), operating since 1989, specializes in providing high-yielding, short-term accounts receivable financing~~premiums is also meaningfully impacted by leveraging information technology systems, maintaining operational efficiency and ~~value-added, out-sourced administrative services, such as data processing~~increasing average loan size, each of payrolls, billing and cash management services, to clients in the temporary staffing industry. Tricom’s clients, located throughout the United States, provide staffing services to businesses in diversified industries. These receivables may involve greater credit risks than generally associated with the loan portfolios of more traditional community banks depending on the marketability of the collateral. The principal sources of repayments on the receivables are payments to borrowers from their customers who are located throughout the United States. Tricom mitigates this risk by employing lockboxes and other cash management techniques to protect its interests. Tricom’s revenue principally consists of interest income from financing activities and fee-based revenues from administrative services.

Wintrust Mortgage Corporation (“WMC”) (formerly WestAmerica Mortgage Company) engages in the origination and purchase of residential mortgages for sale into the secondary market. WMC sells its loans with servicing released and does not currently engage in servicing loans for others. WMC maintains principal origination offices in eight states, including Illinois, and originates loans in other states through wholesale and correspondent offices. WMC provides the Banks with the ability to use an enhanced loan origination and documentation system which allows ~~WMC and each Bank~~us to ~~better utilize existing operational capacity and~~ expand the mortgage products offered to the Banks’ customers. In December 2008, Wintrust Mortgage Corporation acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of the mortgage banking business of Professional Mortgage Partners (“PMP”).

In addition to the earning asset niches provided by the Company’s non-bank subsidiaries, several earning asset niches operate within the Banks. Hinsdale Bank operates a mortgage warehouse lending program that providesour loan and deposit services to mortgage brokerage companies located predominantly in the Chicago metropolitan area, Crystal Lake Bank has a specialty in small aircraft lending, Lake Forest Bank has a franchise lending program and Barrington Bank has the Community Advantage program which provides lending, deposit and cash management services to condominium, homeowner and community associations. The Company continues to pursue the development or acquisition of other specialty lending businesses that generate assets suitable for bank investment and/or secondary market sales.

~~In the third quarter of 2008, the Company ceased the origination of indirect automobile loans. This niche business served the Company well over the past twelve years in helping~~~~de novo~~banks to grow quickly and profitably into their physical structures. Competitive pricing pressures have significantly reduced the long-term potential profitably of this niche business. Given the current economic environment and the retirement of the founder of this niche business, exiting the origination of this business was deemed to be in the best interest of the Company. The Company will continue to service its existing portfolio for the duration of the life of the existing credits.volume without significant capital investment.

Wealth Management

Wayne Hummer Investments LLC (“WHI”), a registered broker-dealer, provides a full-range of investment products and services tailored to meet the specific needs of individual and institutional investors throughout the country, but primarily in the Midwest. In addition, WHI providesWe currently offer a full range of ~~investment~~wealth management services ~~to clients~~ through a network of relationships with unaffiliated community-based financial institutions located primarily in Illinois. Although headquartered in Chicago, WHI also operates an office in Appleton, Wisconsin and has branch locations in a majority of the Company’s Banks.

Wayne Hummer Asset Management Company (“WHAMC”), a registered investment advisor, is the investment advisory affiliate of WHI. WHAMC provides money management, financial planning and investment advisory services to individuals and institutional, municipal and tax-exempt organizations. WHAMC also provides portfolio management and financial supervision for a wide-range of pension and profit sharing plans. In the second quarter of 2009, WHAMC purchased certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of Advanced Investment Partners, LLC (“AIP”). AIP is an investment management firm specializing in the active management of domestic equity investment strategies.

~~Wayne Hummer Trust Company (“WHTC”) was formed to offer~~three separate subsidiaries, including trust and investment services, asset management and securities brokerage services, ~~to all communities served by~~marketed primarily under the Banks. In addition to offering trust services to existing bank customers at each of the Banks, WHTC targets small to mid-size businesses and affluent individuals whose needs command the personalized attention offered by WHTC’s experienced trust professionals. Services offered by WHTC typically include traditional trust products and services, as well as investment management services.Wayne Hummer name.

3440

The ~~following table presents a summary~~primary influences on the profitability of the ~~approximate~~wealth management business can be associated with the level of commission received related to the trading performed by the brokerage customers for their accounts; and the amount of assets under ~~administration and/~~management for which asset management and trust units receive a management fee for advisory, administrative and custodial services. As such, revenues are influenced by a rise or ~~management~~fall in the ~~Company’s wealth management operating subsidiaries~~debt and equity markets and the resultant increase or decrease in the value of our client accounts on which are fees are based. The commissions received by the brokerage unit are not as directly influenced by the directionality of the ~~dates shown:~~

June 30, December 31, June 30,
(Dollars in thousands) 2009 2008 2008
WHTC $ 1,591,639 $ 1,168,321 $ 989,028
WHAMC⁽¹⁾
995,061 399,799 430,864
WHAMC’s proprietary mutual funds 16,120 7,311 10,927
WHI — brokerage assets in custody 4,200,000 4,000,000 5,100,000


~~(1)~~		~~Excludes proprietary mutual funds managed by WHAMC~~

~~The increase~~debt and equity markets but rather the desire of our customers to engage in ~~assets under administration and/~~trading based on their particular situations and outlooks of the market or ~~management by WHTC~~particular stocks and ~~WHI~~bonds. Profitability in the ~~second quarter of 2009 was primarily due to higher market valuations.~~

~~The AIP transaction during the second quarter of 2009 was the main contributing factor in the growth of assets under administration and/or management~~brokerage business is impacted by WHAMC, excluding its proprietary mutual funds. Other assets under administration and/or management by WHAMC, including its proprietary mutual funds, increased mainly as a result of higher market valuations.commissions which fluctuate over time.

~~Treasury~~Federal Government, Federal Reserve and FDIC Programs

Since October of 2008, the federal government, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (the “New York Fed”) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) have made a number of programs available to banks and other financial institutions in an effort to ensure a well-functioning U.S. financial system. We participate in three of these programs: the Capital Purchase Program, administered by the U.S. Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”), the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (“TALF”), created by the New York Fed, and the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (“TLGP”), created by the FDIC.

OnParticipation in Capital Purchase Program.In October 3, 2008, the Treasury announced that it intended to use a portion of the initial funds allocated to it pursuant to the Troubled Asset Relief Program (“TARP”), created by the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, to invest directly in financial institutions through the newly-created Capital Purchase Program (“~~EESA”~~CPP”). At that time, U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson stated that the program was ~~signed~~“designed to attract broad participation by healthy institutions” which “have plenty of capital to get through this period, but are not positioned to lend as widely as is necessary to support our economy.”

Our management believed at the time of the CPP investment, as it does now, that Treasury’s CPP investment was not necessary for the Company’s short or long-term health. However, the CPP investment presented an opportunity for us. By providing us with a significant source of relatively inexpensive capital, the Treasury’s CPP investment allows us to accelerate our growth cycle and expand lending.

Consequently, we applied for CPP funds and our application was accepted by Treasury. As a result, on December 19, 2008, we entered into ~~law. Under the EESA,~~an agreement with the U.S. Department of the Treasury (the “Treasury”) has the authority to, among other things, invest in financial institutions for the purpose of stabilizing and providing liquidity to the U.S. financial markets. Pursuant to this authority, the Treasury announced its Troubled Asset Relief Program (“TARP”) Capital Purchase Program (“CPP”), under which it is purchasing senior preferred stock and warrants in eligible institutions to increase the flow of credit to businesses and consumers and to support the economy.

~~On December 19, 2008, the Company entered into an agreement with the Treasury~~ to participate in ~~the~~Treasury’s CPP, pursuant to which ~~the Company~~we issued and sold preferred stock and a warrant to Treasury in exchange for aggregate consideration of $250 ~~million.~~ million (the “CPP investment”). As a result of the CPP investment, our total risk-based capital ratio as of December 31, 2008 increased from 10.3% to 13.1%. To be considered “well capitalized,” we must maintain a total risk-based capital ratio in excess of 10%.

The terms of our agreement with Treasury impose significant restrictions upon us, including increased scrutiny by Treasury, banking regulators and Congress, additional corporate governance requirements, restrictions upon our ability to repurchase stock and pay dividends and, as a result of increasingly stringent regulations issued by Treasury following the closing of the CPP investment, significant restrictions upon executive compensation. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement between Treasury and us, Treasury is permitted to amend the agreement unilaterally in order to comply with any changes in applicable federal statutes.

The CPP investment provided the Company with additional capital resources which in turn permitted the expansion of the flow of credit to U.S. consumers and businesses beyond what we would have done without the CPP funding. The capital itself is not loaned to our borrowers but represents additional shareholders’ equity that has been leveraged by the Company to permit it to provide new loans to qualified borrowers and raise deposits to fund the additional lending without incurring excessive risk.

Due to the combination of our prior decisions in appropriately managing our risks, the capital support provided from the August 2008 private issuance of $50 million of convertible preferred stock ~~qualifies~~and the additional capital support from the CPP, we have been able to take advantage of opportunities when they have arisen and our banks continue to be active lenders within their communities. Without the additional funds from the CPP, our prudent management philosophy and strict underwriting standards likely would have required us to continue to restrain lending due to the need to preserve capital during these uncertain economic conditions. While many other banks saw 2009 as ~~Tier 1~~a year of retraction or stagnation as it relates to lending activities, the capital ~~and pays~~from the CPP positioned Wintrust to make 2009 a ~~cumulative dividend rate of 5% per annum for~~year in which we expanded our lending. Specifically, since the first five years and a rate of 9% per annum beginning on February 15, 2014. The preferred stock is non-voting, other than class voting rights on certain matters that could amend the rights of or adversely affect the stock.

~~While EESA imposed some limitations and conditions on the Company’s ability to redeem the preferred stock, those limitations and conditions were eliminated with the enactment~~receipt of the ~~ARRA. Now~~CPP funds, we have funded in excess of $7.8 billion of loans, including funding of new loans, advances on prior commitments and renewals of maturing loans, consisting of over 146,000 individual credits. These loans are to a wide variety of businesses and we consider such loans to be essential to assisting growth in the ~~Company is permitted, subject~~economy. On a net basis, the CPP capital helped enable us to ~~consultation~~increase our total loans from $7.6 billion as of December 31, 2008 to $8.3 billion as of September 30, 2009 and to increase deposits to fund those loans from $8.4 billion as of December 31, 2008 to $9.8 billion as of September 30, 2009.

In connection with our participation in the ~~appropriate Federal banking agency,~~CPP, we have committed to expand the flow of credit to U.S. consumers and businesses on competitive terms, and to work to modify the terms of residential mortgages as appropriate. The following tables set forth quarterly information regarding our efforts to comply with these commitments since we received the CPP investment on December 19, 2008:


	Quarter ended
	September 30,		Quarter ended		Quarter ended
(Dollars in thousands)	2009		June 30, 2009		March 31, 2009
Consumer Loans
Number of new and renewed loans originated		1,940		1,676		2,649
Aggregate amount of loans originated	$	61,806	$	92,833	$	54,002
Commercial and Commercial Real Estate Loans
Number of new and renewed loans originated		830		945		1,896
Aggregate amount of loans originated	$	305,865	$	414,179	$	551,500
Residential Real Estate Loans
Number of new and renewed loans originated		4,655		6,735		5,230
Aggregate amount of loans originated	$	984,985	$	1,552,442	$	1,284,465
Commercial premium Finance Loans
Number of new and renewed loans originated		40,995		40,663		38,173
Aggregate amount of loans originated	$	910,923	$	930,921	$	892,127

To date, Wintrust generally has not modified the terms of residential mortgages.

We have no present plans to repay the ~~preferred stock at any time. If~~CPP investment, but believe that we have the ~~Company repurchases~~ability to conduct an equity offering that would allow us to make such repayment. Accordingly, we intend to remain focused on investing the ~~preferred stock, we may also repurchase the warrant at fair market value. In the event the Company does not repurchase the warrant, the Secretary~~proceeds of the ~~Treasury~~CPP investment, and will only seek to repay such investment when we believe doing so is ~~required to liquidate the warrant.~~

~~The Treasury may transfer the preferred stock to a third party at any time. Participation~~ in the ~~CPP restricts~~best interests of our shareholders.

For additional information on the ~~Company’s ability to increase dividends on its common stock or to repurchase its common stock until three years have elapsed, unless (i) all~~terms of the preferred stock and the warrant, see Note 17 of the Financial Statements presented under Item 1 of this report.

TALF-Eligible Issuance. In September 2009, our indirect subsidiary, FIFC Premium Funding I, LLC, sold $600 million in aggregate principal amount of its Series 2009-A Premium Finance Asset Backed Notes, Class A (the “Notes”), which were issued in a securitization transaction sponsored by FIFC. FIFC Premium Funding I, LLC’s obligations under the Notes are secured by revolving loans made to buyers of property and casualty insurance policies to finance the related premiums payable by the buyers to the ~~Treasury~~insurance companies for the policies.

At the time of issuance, the Notes were eligible collateral under TALF and certain investors therefore received non-recourse funding from the New York Fed in order to purchase the Notes. As a result, FIFC believes it received greater proceeds at lower interest rates from the securitization than it otherwise would have received in non-TALF-eligible transactions. As a result, if TALF is ~~redeemed, (ii) all~~not renewed or is allowed to expire, it is possible that funding our growth will be more costly if we pursue similar transactions in the future. However, as is true in the case of the CPP investment, management views the TALF-eligible securitization as a funding mechanism offering us the ability to accelerate our growth plan, rather than one essential to the maintenance of our “well capitalized” status.

TLGP Guarantee. In November 2008, the FDIC adopted a final rule establishing the TLGP. The TLGP provided two limited guarantee programs: One, the Debt Guarantee Program, that guaranteed newly-issued senior unsecured debt, and another, the Transaction Account Guarantee program (“TAG”) that guaranteed certain non-interest-bearing transaction accounts at insured depository institutions. All insured depository institutions that offer non-interest-bearing transaction accounts had the option to participate in either program. We did not participate in the Debt Guarantee Program.

In December 2008, each of our subsidiary banks elected to participate in the TAG, which provides unlimited FDIC insurance coverage for the entire account balance in exchange for an additional insurance premium to be paid by the depository institution for accounts with balances in excess of the current FDIC insurance limit of $250,000. This additional insurance coverage would continue through December 31, 2009. In October 2009, the FDIC notified depository institutions that it was extending the TAG program for an additional six months until June 30, 2010 at the option of participating banks. Our subsidiary banks have determined that it is in their best interest to continue participation in the TAG program and have opted to participate for the additional six-month period.

Business Outlook

Recent Performance

We recorded net income of $32.0 million, or $1.07 per diluted share, for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, compared to $6.5 million of net income, or $0.06 per diluted common share, recorded in the second quarter of 2009. Compared to the third quarter of 2008, earnings per diluted common share increased $1.20 per share, on a $34.4 million increase in net income. Earnings per diluted common share in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the third quarter of 2008 were reduced by preferred stock ~~issued~~dividends including discount accretion, related to ~~the Treasury has been transferred to third parties, or (iii) the Company receives the consent of the Treasury. In conjunction with the purchase~~our issuances of preferred stock in the ~~Treasury received~~second half of 2008, reducing net income available to common shareholders by $4.1 million, or $0.15 per diluted common share.

Management believes it made good progress on many strategic initiatives during a ~~warrant to purchase 1,643,295 shares~~very active quarter. The acquisition of the ~~Company’s common stock~~life insurance premium finance portfolio was accounted for ~~an aggregate market price~~as a business combination and resulted in a bargain purchase gain of ~~$37,500,000.~~which $113.1 million was recognized in the third quarter of 2009. Management anticipates the Company will recognize additional bargain purchase gains on this portfolio in subsequent quarters to the extent that third party consents are obtained with respect to certain loans in the portfolio. The ~~warrant is immediately exercisable~~securitization of a portion of our commercial premium finance loan portfolio enhanced our regulatory capital position, balance sheet liquidity and ~~has a ten year term.~~earnings.

Our net interest margin for the quarter increased to 3.25% from 2.91% in the second quarter and 2.74% in the third quarter of 2008 reflecting positive results from both deposit and asset re-pricing and solid balance sheet growth at reasonable and commensurate pricing levels. Fee and other income remained relatively strong while expenses, other than credit related expenses, were in line with expectations.

3543

In ~~conjunction~~regard to credit quality trends, we recorded a provision for credit losses of approximately $91 million to accommodate net charge-offs of approximately $80 million during the quarter. In addition to these charge-offs, we also recorded approximately $10 million of expense related to write downs of other real estate owned (“OREO”). Approximately $29 million of the quarter’s charge-offs relate to loans where specific reserves had previously been established. Approximately $12 million of the charge-offs related to either dispositions or new problem assets. The remaining $39 million related to continued downward revaluation of collateral values primarily related to real estate development. This revaluation, along with the ~~Company’s participation~~$10 million OREO charge, can be attributed to our commitment to liquidate problem assets in a very aggressive manner and, more importantly, to very recent changes in overall market conditions. As an increasing amount of troubled assets are being liquidated in the ~~CPP,~~market as a whole, the ~~Company was required~~appraised values are dropping accordingly, reflecting the adverse impact of the additional supply. These reduced valuations are further supported by liquidation bids which we have received on our portfolio of non-performing assets.

Our allowance for loan losses increased to ~~adopt~~$95.1 million or 1.15% of total loans. Adding our reserve for lending-related commitments and credit discount on purchased assets brings total credit reserves and discounts to $134.4 million or 1.62% of total loans. Management believes the ~~Treasury’s standards~~allowance for ~~executive compensation~~loan losses is adequate given existing knowledge of our loan portfolio. However, if the valuation of real estate declines further, we may need to provide for additional potential losses in future quarters.

Total non-performing assets decreased $7.4 million from the prior quarter end. Quarter-end non-performing loans include approximately $17 million of administrative past due loans that were subsequently cleared in October 2009. Management plans to continue its aggressive disposition of problem assets in the fourth quarter.

We continue to focus on increasing core earnings and ~~corporate governance for~~clearing the ~~period during which~~balance sheet of problem assets. Core earning opportunities remain in the Treasury holds equity issued under the CPP. These standards initially applied to the chief executive officer, chief financial officer, plus the three most highly compensated executive officers. However, such restrictions now apply to the next 20 most highly compensated employees in addition to our senior executive officers. In addition, the Company is required to not deduct for tax purposes executive compensationareas of deposit re-pricing, core franchise growth and liquidity redeployment. At quarter end, we had in excess of ~~$500,000 for each senior executive.~~

~~Participation~~$1 billion in liquid assets and were operating at an 84% loan to deposit ratio—just below the CPP subjects the Company to increased oversight by the Treasury, banking regulators and Congress. Under the terms of the CPP, the Treasury has the power to unilaterally amend the terms of the purchase agreement to the extent required to comply with changes in applicable federal law and to inspect corporate books and records through Wintrust’s federal banking regulator. In addition, the Treasury has the right to appoint two directors to the Wintrust board if the Company misses dividend payments for six dividend periods, whether or not consecutive, on the preferred stock.

On June 10, 2009, the U.S. Treasury issued interim final rules implementing the compensation and corporate governance requirements under the ARRA, which amended the requirements of the EESA, as described in our quarterly report for the quarter ended March 31, 2009. The rules apply to us as a recipient of funds under the CPP as of the date of publication in the Federal Register on June 15, 2009, but are subject to comment until August 14, 2009. The rules clarify prohibitions on bonus payments, provide guidance on the use of restricted stock units, expand restrictions on golden parachute payments, mandate enforcement of clawback provisions unless unreasonable to do so, outline the steps compensation committees must take when evaluating risks posed by compensation arrangements, and require the adoption and disclosure of a luxury expenditure policy, among other things. New requirements under the rules include enhanced disclosure of perquisites and the use of compensation consultants, and a prohibition on tax gross-up payments.

~~Recent Legislative and Regulatory Developments~~

On June 17, 2009, the Administration released a broad and complex plan for financial regulatory reform that would restructure the current regulatory system, significantly increasing supervision and regulation of financial firms, services and markets. The plan would create a new Financial Services Oversight Council, chaired by the U.S. Treasury and including the heads of the principal federal financial regulators as members, to identify systemic risks and improve interagency cooperation. The plan would strengthen capital and other prudential standards for all banks and bank holding companies and require all financial holding companies to be “well-capitalized” and “well-managed” on a consolidated basis. The plan also proposes the establishment of a new independent agency, the Consumer Financial Protection Agency (“CFPA”), which would regulate consumer financial services and products, such as credit, savings and payment products. The CFPA would have sole rulemaking and interpretive authority under existing and future consumer financial services laws and supervisory, examination and enforcement authority over all institutions subject to its regulations. The CFPA’s rules would serve as a floor allowing states to adopt and enforce stricter laws for institutions of all types, regardless of charter, and to enforce these laws, as well as regulations of the CFPA. The plan would also strengthen the supervision and regulation of securitization markets. It would require loan originators to retain a portion of the credit risk of securitized exposures and increase reporting by asset-backed securities issuers. Although the Administration’s goal is to have the proposed plan legislated before thelow end of ~~the year, implementation could take longer based on the complexity and controversial nature of the proposals. Modifications~~our desired 85% to ~~the proposals are likely, and the final legislation may differ significantly from the plan.~~90% range.

3644

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Earnings Summary

The Company’s key operating measures for 2009, as compared to the same period last year, are shown below:

Three Months Three Months Percentage (%) or
Ended Ended Basis Point (bp)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) June 30, 2009 June 30, 2008 Change
Net income $ 6,549 $ 11,276 (42 )%
Net income per common share — Diluted 0.06 0.47 (87 )
Net revenue⁽¹⁾
117,949 93,004 27
Net interest income 72,497 59,400 22
Net interest margin⁽²⁾
2.91 % 2.77 % 14 bp
Net overhead ratio⁽³⁾
1.41 1.31 10
Efficiency ratio^{(2) (4)}
72.02 69.54 248
Return on average assets 0.24 0.47 (23 )
Return on average common equity 0.79 5.97 (518 )


										Three Months			Three Months			Percentage (%) or
										Ended			Ended			Basis Point (bp)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)										September 30, 2009			September 30, 2008			Change
Net income										$	31,995		$	(2,448	)		1,407	%
Net income per common share – Diluted											1.07			(0.13	)		923

Net revenue⁽¹⁾											238,343			82,810			188
Net interest income											87,663			60,680			44

Net interest margin⁽²⁾											3.25	%		2.74	%		51	bp
Net overhead ratio⁽³⁾											(1.95	)		1.65			(360	)
Efficiency ratio^{(2) (4)}											38.69			76.64			(3,795	)
Return on average assets											1.08			(0.10	)		118
Return on average common equity											13.79			(1.59	)		1,538

	Six Months			Six Months			Percentage (%) or			Nine Months			Nine Months			Percentage (%) or
	Ended			Ended			Basis Point (bp)			Ended			Ended			Basis Point (bp)
	June 30, 2009			June 30, 2008			Change			September 30, 2009			September 30, 2008			Change
Net income	$	12,907		$	20,981			(38	)%	$	44,902		$	18,533			142	%
Net income per common share — Diluted		0.12			0.87			(86	)
Net income per common share – Diluted											1.25			0.75			67

Net revenue⁽¹⁾		219,158			179,318			22			457,501			262,127			75
Net interest income		137,279			121,142			13			224,942			181,822			24

Net interest margin⁽²⁾		2.81	%		2.88	%	(7		)bp		2.98	%		2.83	%		15	bp
Net overhead ratio⁽³⁾		1.47			1.47			—			0.25			1.54			(129	)
Efficiency ratio^{(2) (4)}		73.00			70.30			270			55.15			72.28			(1,713	)
Return on average assets		0.24			0.44			(20	)		0.54			0.26			28
Return on average common equity		0.75			5.61			(486	)		5.16			3.20			196

At end of period															��
Total assets	$	11,359,536		$	9,923,077			14	%	$	12,136,021		$	9,864,920			23	%
Total loans, net of unearned income		7,595,476			7,153,603			6			8,275,257			7,322,545			13
Total loans, including loans held-for-sale		8,416,576			7,271,982			16			8,468,512			7,390,943			2
Total deposits		9,191,332			7,761,367			18			9,847,163			7,829,527			26
Junior subordinated debentures		249,493			249,579			—			249,493			249,537			—
Total shareholders’ equity		1,065,076			749,025			42			1,106,082			809,331			37

Book value per common share		32.59			31.70			3			34.10			32.07			6
Market price per common share		16.08			23.85			(33	)		27.96			29.35			(5	)

Allowance for credit losses to total loans⁽⁵⁾		1.14	%		0.81	%	33		bp		1.19	%		0.91	%		28
Total credit reserves to total loans⁽⁶⁾											1.62	%		0.91	%		71
Non-performing loans to total loans		3.14			1.21			193			2.80			1.54			126

Supplemental Financial Measures/Ratios

The accounting and reporting polices of Wintrust conform to generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States and prevailing practices in the banking industry. However, certain non-GAAP performance measures and ratios are used by management to evaluate and measure the Company’s performance. These include taxable-equivalent net interest income (including its individual components), net interest margin (including its individual components) and the efficiency ratio. Management believes that these measures and ratios provide users of the Company’s financial information with a more meaningful view of the performance of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and of the Company’s operating efficiency. Other financial holding companies may define or calculate these measures and ratios differently.

Management reviews yields on certain asset categories and the net interest margin of the Company and its banking subsidiaries on a fully taxable-equivalent (“FTE”) basis. In this non-GAAP presentation, net interest income is adjusted to reflect tax-exempt interest income on an equivalent before-tax basis. This measure ensures comparability of net interest income arising from both taxable and tax-exempt sources. Net interest income on a FTE basis is also used in the calculation of the Company’s efficiency ratio. The efficiency ratio, which is calculated by dividing non-interest expense by total taxable-equivalent net revenue (less securities gains or losses), measures how much it costs to produce one dollar of revenue. Securities gains or losses are excluded from this calculation to better match revenue from daily operations to operational expenses.

A reconciliation of certain non-GAAP performance measures and ratios used by the Company to evaluate and measure the Company’s performance to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures is shown below:


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						September 30,						September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2009			2008			2009			2008			2009			2008			2009			2008

(A) Interest income (GAAP)	$	127,129		$	126,160		$	249,208		$	262,336		$	141,577		$	126,569		$	390,785		$	388,905
Taxable-equivalent adjustment:
— Loans		110			158			267			357
— Liquidity management assets		450			428			902			939
— Other earning assets		10			6			21			19
– Loans														93			142			360			499
– Liquidity management assets														413			423			1,314			1,362
– Other earning assets														9			12			30			31

Interest income — FTE	$	127,699		$	126,752		$	250,398		$	263,651
Interest income – FTE													$	142,092		$	127,146		$	392,489		$	390,797
(B) Interest expense (GAAP)		54,632			66,760			111,929			141,194			53,914			65,889			165,843			207,083

Net interest income — FTE	$	73,067		$	59,992		$	138,469		$	122,457
Net interest income – FTE													$	88,178		$	61,257		$	226,646		$	183,714

(C) Net interest income (GAAP) (A minus B)	$	72,497		$	59,400		$	137,279		$	121,142		$	87,663		$	60,680		$	224,942		$	181,822

(D) Net interest margin (GAAP)		2.88	%		2.74	%		2.79	%		2.84	%		3.23	%		2.71	%		2.95	%		2.80	%
Net interest margin — FTE		2.91	%		2.77	%		2.81	%		2.88	%
Net interest margin – FTE														3.25	%		2.74	%		2.98	%		2.83	%
(E) Efficiency ratio (GAAP)		72.37	%		69.98	%		73.39	%		70.82	%		38.77	%		77.18	%		55.36	%		72.80	%
Efficiency ratio — FTE		72.02	%		69.54	%		73.00	%		70.30	%

Efficiency ratio – FTE														38.69	%		76.64	%		55.15	%		72.28	%

Critical Accounting Policies

The Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States and prevailing practices of the banking industry. Application of these principles requires management to make estimates, assumptions, and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Certain policies and accounting principles inherently have a greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions and judgments, and as such have a greater possibility that changes in those estimates and assumptions could produce financial results that are materially different than originally reported. Estimates, assumptions and judgments are necessary when assets and liabilities are required to be recorded at fair value, when a decline in the value of an asset not carried on the financial statements at fair value warrants an impairment write-down or valuation reserve to be established, or when an asset or liability needs to be recorded contingent upon a future event, are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements; accordingly, as information changes, the financial statements could reflect different estimates and assumptions. Management views critical accounting policies to be those which are highly dependent on subjective or complex judgments, estimates and assumptions, and where changes in those estimates and assumptions could have a significant impact on the financial statements. Management currently views critical accounting policies to include the determination of the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for losses on lending-related commitments, estimations of fair value, the valuations required for impairment testing of goodwill, the valuation and accounting for derivative instruments and income taxes as the accounting areas that require the most subjective and complex judgments, and as such could be most subject to revision as new information becomes available. For a more detailed discussion on these critical accounting policies, see “Summary of Critical Accounting Policies” beginning on page 36 of the Company’s 2008 Form 10-K.

Net Income

Net income for the quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 totaled ~~$6.5~~$32.0 million, ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$4.7~~$34.4 million ~~or 42%,~~ compared to the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008, and ~~a decrease~~an increase of approximately ~~$190,000, or 3%,~~$25.4 compared to the ~~first~~second quarter of 2009. On a per share basis, net income for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 totaled ~~$0.06~~$1.07 per diluted common share, ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$0.41~~$1.20 per share ~~or 87%,~~ as compared to the 2008 ~~second~~third quarter ~~total~~net loss of ~~$0.47~~$0.13 per diluted common share. Contributing to the 87% decrease in earnings per diluted common share in the second quarter of 2009 compared to the second quarter of 2008 were preferred share dividends of $10.0 million, including discount accretion, which reduced net income available to common shareholders. Compared to the ~~first~~second quarter of 2009, net income per diluted share in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 ~~remained unchanged at $0.06.~~increased by $1.01.

~~Significant~~The most significant factors affecting net income for the third quarter of 2009 as compared to the same period in the prior year include a gain on bargain purchase as a result of the acquisition of the A.I. Credit life insurance premium finance portfolio and an increase in the provision for credit losses. Other items affecting the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 results as compared to the same period in the prior year include increased net interest income, higher mortgage banking revenues, ~~and~~ the increase in market value of collateralized mortgage obligations held in the Company’s trading portfolio and the gain on the sale of premium finance receivables, partially offset by ~~a higher provision for credit losses,~~an increase in other real estate expenses, higher levels of mortgage banking commissions and ~~preferred share dividends paid,~~ lower levels of option ~~income and a special assessment~~income. A higher level of ~~FDIC deposit insurance.~~preferred share dividends also contributed to lower diluted earnings per share. The return on average equity for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 was ~~0.79%~~13.79%, compared to ~~5.97%~~(1.59)% for the prior year ~~second~~third quarter and ~~0.71%~~0.79% for the ~~first~~second quarter of 2009.

Net income for the first ~~six~~nine months of 2009 totaled ~~$12.9~~$44.9 million, ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$8.1~~$26.4 million, or ~~38%~~142%, compared to ~~$21.0~~$18.5 million for the same period in 2008. On a per share basis, net income per diluted common share was ~~$0.12~~$1.25 for the first ~~six~~nine months of 2009, ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$0.75~~$0.50 per share, or ~~86%~~67%, compared to ~~$0.87~~$0.75 for the first ~~six~~nine months of 2008. Return on average equity for the first ~~six~~nine months of 2009 was ~~0.75%~~5.16% versus ~~5.61%~~3.20% for the same period of 2008.

3947

Net Interest Income

Net interest income, which represents the difference between interest income and fees on earning assets and interest expense on deposits and borrowings, is the major source of earnings for the Company. Interest rate fluctuations and the volume and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities impact net interest income. Net interest margin represents tax-equivalent net interest income as a percentage of the average earning assets during the period.

The following table presents a summary of the Company’s net interest income and related net interest margins, calculated on a fully taxable equivalent basis, for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 as compared to the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008 (linked quarters):


	For the Three Months Ended								For the Three Months Ended								For the Three Months Ended								For the Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2009								June 30, 2008								September 30, 2009								September 30, 2008
(Dollars in thousands)	Average			Interest		Rate			Average			Interest		Rate			Average			Interest		Rate			Average			Interest		Rate

Liquidity management assets^{(1) (2) (7)}	$	1,851,179		$	17,102		3.71	%	$	1,543,795		$	17,521		4.56	%	$	2,078,330		$	15,403		2.94	%	$	1,544,465		$	18,247		4.70	%
Other earning assets^{(2) (3) (7)}		22,694			185		3.27			22,519			270		4.83			24,874			148		2.36			21,687			262		4.81
Loans, net of unearned income^{(2) (4) (7)}		8,212,572			110,412		5.39			7,158,317			108,961		6.12			8,665,281			126,541		5.79			7,343,845			108,637		5.89

Total earning assets⁽⁷⁾	$	10,086,445		$	127,699		5.08	%	$	8,724,631		$	126,752		5.84	%	$	10,768,485		$	142,092		5.24	%	$	8,909,997		$	127,146		5.68	%

Allowance for loan losses		(72,990	)							(53,798	)							(85,300	)							(57,751	)
Cash and due from banks		118,402								125,806								109,645								133,527
Other assets		905,611								885,815								1,004,690								895,781

Total assets	$	11,037,468							$	9,682,454							$	11,797,520							$	9,881,554


Interest-bearing deposits	$	8,097,096		$	43,502		2.15	%	$	6,906,437		$	53,862		3.14	%	$	8,799,578		$	42,806		1.93	%	$	7,127,065		$	53,405		2.98	%
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		435,983			4,503		4.14			437,642			4,557		4.19			434,134			4,536		4.14			438,983			4,583		4.15
Notes payable and other borrowings		249,123			1,752		2.82			439,130			2,900		2.66			245,352			1,779		2.88			398,911			2,661		2.65
Subordinated notes		66,648			428		2.54			75,000			843		4.45			65,000			333		2.01			75,000			786		4.10
Junior subordinated debentures		249,494			4,447		7.05			249,594			4,598		7.29			249,493			4,460		6.99			249,552			4,454		6.98

Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	9,098,344		$	54,632		2.41	%	$	8,107,803		$	66,760		3.31	%	$	9,793,557		$	53,914		2.18	%	$	8,289,511		$	65,889		3.16	%

Non-interest bearing deposits		754,479								663,526								775,202								678,651
Other liabilities		117,250								150,872								158,666								147,500
Equity		1,067,395								760,253								1,070,095								765,892

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	11,037,468							$	9,682,454							$	11,797,520							$	9,881,554


Interest rate spread^{(5) (7)}							2.67	%							2.53	%							3.06	%							2.52	%
Net free funds/contribution⁽⁶⁾	$	988,101					0.24		$	616,828					0.24		$	974,928					0.19		$	620,486					0.22

Net interest income/Net interest margin⁽⁷⁾				$	73,067		2.91	%				$	59,992		2.77	%				$	88,178		3.25	%				$	61,257		2.74	%
																												-

Quarter Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 compared to the Quarter Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008

Tax-equivalent net interest income for the quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 totaled ~~$73.1~~$88.2 million, an increase of ~~$13.1~~$26.9 million, or ~~22%~~44%, as compared to the ~~$60.0~~$61.3 million recorded in the same quarter of 2008. For the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009, the net interest margin was ~~2.91%~~3.25%, up 1451 basis points when compared to the net interest margin of ~~2.77%~~2.74% in the same quarter of 2008.

The yield on total earning assets was ~~5.08%~~5.24% for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 and ~~5.84%~~5.68% in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008. The ~~second~~third quarter 2009 yield on loans was ~~5.39%~~5.79%, a 7310 basis point decrease when compared to the prior year ~~second~~third quarter yield of ~~6.12%~~5.89%. The yield on liquidity management assets in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 was ~~3.71%~~2.94% compared to ~~4.56%~~4.70% in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008.

The rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities was ~~2.41%~~2.18% in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 and ~~3.31%~~3.16% in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008. The interest-bearing deposit rate in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 declined 99105 basis points to ~~2.15%~~1.93% from a rate of ~~3.14%~~2.98% in the same quarter in 2008.

The rate paid on wholesale funding, consisting of Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago advances, notes payable, subordinated notes, other borrowings and junior subordinated debentures, ~~decreased~~increased to ~~4.43%~~4.41% in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 compared to ~~4.29%~~4.24% in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008. The Company utilizes certain borrowing sources to fund the additional capital requirements of the ~~Banks,~~banks, manage capital, manage its interest rate risk position and for general corporate purposes.

The higher level of net interest income recorded in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 compared to the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008 was attributable to ~~increasing credit spreads on new~~the impact of the life insurance premium finance loan ~~volumes,~~purchase and the ability to raise and retain interest-bearing deposits at ~~more reasonable rates~~lower rates. Average earning asset growth of $1.9 billion in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the third quarter of 2008 was comprised of $1.3 billion of loan growth and ~~strong earning~~$533.9 million of liquid management asset growth. The ~~Company has made significant progress~~$1.9 billion of earning asset growth was primarily funded by a $1.5 billion increase in ~~shifting its mix~~the average balances of ~~retail~~interest-bearing liabilities.

In the third quarter of 2009, the yield on loans decreased 10 basis points and the rate on interest-bearing deposits ~~away~~decreased 105 basis points compared to the third quarter of 2008. The bulk of the small decrease in yield on loans is attributable to the low interest rate environment, partially offset by higher yields from the purchase of the life insurance premium finance receivables. Management believes opportunities remain for the increasing credit spreads in commercial and commercial real estate loan portfolios and for lower rates from the re-pricing of maturing retail certificates of ~~deposit into lower cost, more variable rate NOW, savings, money market and wealth management deposits. Additionally, the Company has been able~~deposits, both of which should contribute to ~~successfully raise deposits to fund loan growth through competitive products, including its MaxSafe~~^® deposit accounts, which provide customers with expanded FDIC insurance coverage by spreading a customer’s deposit across its fifteen bank charters. This product differentiates the Company’s Banks from many of its competitors that have consolidated their bank charters into one charter with multiple branches.continued net interest margin expansion.

4149


	For the Three Months Ended								For the Three Months Ended								For the Three Months Ended								For the Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2009								March 31, 2009								September 30, 2009								June 30, 2009
(Dollars in thousands)	Average			Interest		Rate			Average			Interest		Rate			Average			Interest		Rate			Average			Interest		Rate


Liquidity management assets^{(1) (2) (7)}	$	1,851,179		$	17,102		3.71	%	$	1,839,161		$	15,499		3.42	%	$	2,078,330		$	15,403		2.94	%	$	1,851,179		$	17,102		3.71	%
Other earning assets^{(2) (3) (7)}		22,694			185		3.27			22,128			155		2.85			24,874			148		2.36			22,694			185		3.27
Loans, net of unearned income^{(2) (4) (7)}		8,212,572			110,412		5.39			7,924,849			107,045		5.48			8,665,281			126,541		5.79			8,212,572			110,412		5.39

Total earning assets⁽⁷⁾	$	10,086,445		$	127,699		5.08	%	$	9,786,138		$	122,699		5.08	%	$	10,768,485		$	142,092		5.24	%	$	10,086,445		$	127,699		5.08	%

Allowance for loan losses		(72,990	)							(72,044	)							(85,300	)							(72,990	)
Cash and due from banks		118,402								107,550								109,645								118,402
Other assets		905,611								903,322								1,004,690								905,611

Total assets	$	11,037,468							$	10,724,966							$	11,797,520							$	11,037,468


Interest-bearing deposits	$	8,097,096		$	43,502		2.15	%	$	7,747,879		$	45,953		2.41	%	$	8,799,578		$	42,806		1.93	%	$	8,097,096		$	43,502		2.15	%
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		435,983			4,503		4.14			435,982			4,453		4.14			434,134			4,536		4.14			435,983			4,503		4.14
Notes payable and other borrowings		249,123			1,752		2.82			301,894			1,870		2.51			245,352			1,779		2.88			249,123			1,752		2.82
Subordinated notes		66,648			428		2.54			70,000			580		3.31			65,000			333		2.01			66,648			428		2.54
Junior subordinated debentures		249,494			4,447		7.05			249,506			4,441		7.12			249,493			4,460		6.99			249,494			4,447		7.05

Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	9,098,344		$	54,632		2.41	%	$	8,805,261		$	57,297		2.64	%	$	9,793,557		$	53,914		2.18	%	$	9,098,344		$	54,632		2.41	%

Non-interest bearing deposits		754,479								733,911								775,202								754,479
Other liabilities		117,250								124,140								158,666								117,250
Equity		1,067,395								1,061,654								1,070,095								1,067,395

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	11,037,468							$	10,724,966							$	11,797,520							$	11,037,468

Interest rate spread^{(5) (7)}							2.67	%							2.44	%							3.06	%							2.67	%
Net free funds/contribution⁽⁶⁾	$	988,101					0.24		$	980,877					0.27		$	974,928					0.19		$	988,101					0.24

Net interest income/Net interest margin⁽⁷⁾				$	73,067		2.91	%				$	65,402		2.71	%				$	88,178		3.25	%				$	73,067		2.91	%

Quarter Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 compared to the Quarter Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009

Tax-equivalent net interest income for the quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 totaled ~~$73.1~~$88.2 million, an increase of ~~$7.7~~$15.1 million, or ~~12%~~21%, as compared to the ~~$65.4~~$73.1 million recorded in the ~~first~~second quarter of 2009. For the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009, the net interest margin was ~~2.91%~~3.25%, up 2034 basis points when compared to the ~~2.71%~~2.91% recorded in the ~~first~~second quarter of 2009.

The yield on total earning assets for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 was 5.24% and 5.08% ~~unchanged as compared to~~in the ~~first~~second quarter of 2009. The ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 yield on loans was ~~5.39%~~5.79%, a 940 basis point ~~decrease~~increase when compared to the ~~first~~second quarter 2009 yield of ~~5.48%~~5.39%. The liquidity management assets yield in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 was ~~3.71%~~2.94% compared to ~~3.42%~~3.71% in the ~~first~~second quarter of 2009.

The rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities decreased to ~~2.41%~~2.18% in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 as compared to ~~2.64%~~2.41% in the ~~first~~second quarter of 2009. The cost of interest-bearing deposits decreased in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 to ~~2.15%~~1.93% compared to ~~2.41%~~2.15% in the ~~first~~second quarter of 2009.

The rate paid on wholesale funding, consisting of Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago advances, notes payable, subordinated notes, other borrowings and junior subordinated debentures, ~~increased~~decreased to 4.41% in the third quarter of 2009 compared to 4.43% in the second ~~quarter of 2009 compared to 4.32% in the first~~ quarter of 2009. The Company utilizes certain borrowing sources to fund the additional capital requirements of the ~~Banks,~~banks, manage capital, manage interest rate risk position and for general corporate purposes.

The higher level of net interest income recorded in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 compared to the ~~first~~second quarter of 2009 was attributable to ~~increasing credit spreads on new~~the impact of the life insurance premium finance loan ~~volumes~~purchase and the ability to raise and retain interest-bearing deposits at ~~more reasonable rates and strong earning asset growth.~~lower rates. Average earning asset growth of ~~$300~~$682.0 million in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 compared to the ~~first~~second quarter of 2009 was comprised of ~~$288~~$452.7 million of loan growth and ~~$12~~$227.2 million of liquid management asset growth. The ~~$300~~$682.0 million of earning asset growth was ~~primarily~~ funded by a ~~$293~~$695.2 million increase in the average balances of interest-bearing liabilities.

In the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009, the yield on loans ~~decreased nine~~increased 40 basis points and the rate on interest-bearing deposits decreased 2622 basis points compared to the ~~first~~second quarter of 2009. The bulk of the ~~decrease~~increase in yield on loans is attributable to the purchase of the life insurance premium finance receivables. Overall rates offered on this product were lower in the second quarter of 2009 than they were in the 2008. The majority of the impact of the most recent lowering of interest rates by the Federal Reserve, totaling 175 basis points in the fourth quarter of 2008, should now be fully incorporated in this portfolio. Management believes opportunities ~~during~~remain for the ~~remainder of 2009 for~~ increasing credit spreads in commercial and commercial real estate loan ~~portfolio~~portfolios and for lower rates from the re-pricing of ~~maturities of~~maturing retail certificates of deposits, both of which should contribute to continued net interest margin expansion.

4351

The following table presents a summary of the Company’s net interest income and related net interest margins, calculated on a fully taxable equivalent basis, for the first ~~six~~nine months of 2009 as compared to the first ~~six~~nine months of 2008:


	For the Six Months Ended								For the Six Months Ended								For the Nine Months Ended								For the Nine Months Ended
	June 30, 2009								June 30, 2008								September 30, 2009								September 30, 2008
(Dollars in thousands)	Average			Interest		Rate			Average			Interest		Rate			Average			Interest		Rate			Average			Interest		Rate


Liquidity management assets^{(1) (2) (7)}	$	1,845,283		$	32,602		3.56	%	$	1,467,768		$	34,867		4.78	%	$	1,923,869		$	48,004		3.34	%	$	1,493,511		$	53,114		4.75	%
Other earning assets^{(2) (3) (7)}		22,412			340		3.06			24,461			671		5.51			23,242			488		2.81			23,530			933		5.30
Loans, net of unearned income^{(2) (4) (7)}		8,065,058			217,456		5.44			7,084,189			228,113		6.48			8,244,336			343,997		5.58			7,171,467			336,750		6.27

Total earning assets⁽⁷⁾	$	9,932,753		$	250,398		5.08	%	$	8,576,418		$	263,651		6.18	%	$	10,191,447		$	392,489		5.15	%	$	8,688,508		$	390,797		6.01	%

Allowance for loan losses		(72,537	)							(52,605	)							(76,886	)							(54,352	)
Cash and due from banks		117,615								125,274								103,164								128,045
Other assets		903,694								877,745								936,468								883,859

Total assets	$	10,881,525							$	9,526,832							$	11,154,193							$	9,646,060


Interest-bearing deposits	$	7,921,810		$	89,455		2.28	%	$	6,827,209		$	115,292		3.40	%	$	8,217,631		$	132,261		2.15	%	$	6,927,829		$	168,697		3.25	%
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		435,983			8,956		4.14			432,276			9,113		4.24			435,359			13,492		4.14			434,528			13,696		4.21
Notes payable and other borrowings		276,893			3,622		2.64			385,319			5,670		2.96			266,264			5,401		2.71			389,882			8,331		2.85
Subordinated notes		68,315			1,008		2.93			75,000			1,930		5.09			67,198			1,341		2.63			75,000			2,716		4.76
Junior subordinated debentures		249,500			8,888		7.09			249,615			9,189		7.28			249,498			13,348		7.05			249,594			13,643		7.18

Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	8,952,501		$	111,929		2.52	%	$	7,969,419		$	141,194		3.56	%	$	9,235,950		$	165,843		2.40	%	$	8,076,833		$	207,083		3.42	%

Non-interest bearing deposits		744,251								653,232								754,666								661,787
Other liabilities		120,185								152,077								97,130								150,639
Equity		1,064,588								752,104								1,066,447								756,801

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	10,881,525							$	9,526,832							$	11,154,193							$	9,646,060


Interest rate spread^{(5) (7)}							2.56	%							2.62	%							2.75	%							2.59	%
Net free funds/contribution⁽⁶⁾	$	980,252					0.25		$	606,999					0.26		$	955,497					0.23		$	611,675					0.24

Net interest income/Net interest margin⁽⁷⁾				$	138,469		2.81	%				$	122,457		2.88	%				$	226,646		2.98	%				$	183,714		2.83	%

~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 compared to the ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008

Tax-equivalent net interest income for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 totaled ~~$138.5~~$226.6 million, an increase of ~~$16.0~~$42.9 million, or ~~13%~~23%, as compared to the ~~$122.5~~$183.7 million recorded in the first ~~half~~nine months of 2008. For the first ~~half~~nine months of 2009, the net interest margin was ~~2.81%~~2.98%, ~~down 7~~up 15 basis points when compared to ~~2.88%~~2.83% in the first ~~half~~nine months of 2008.

The yield on total earning assets for the first ~~half~~nine months of 2009 was ~~5.08%~~5.15% as compared to the ~~6.18%~~6.01% in the first ~~six~~nine months of 2008. The first ~~six~~nine months of 2009 yield on loans was ~~5.44%~~5.58%, a ~~104~~69 basis point decrease when compared to the first ~~six~~nine months of 2008 yield of ~~6.48%~~6.27%. The yield on liquidity management assets in the first ~~half~~nine months of 2009 was ~~3.56%~~3.34% compared to ~~4.78%~~4.75% in the first ~~half~~nine months of 2008.

The rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities decreased to ~~2.52%~~2.40% in the first ~~half~~nine months of 2009 as compared to ~~3.56%~~3.42% in the first ~~half~~nine months of 2008. The cost of interest-bearing deposits decreased in the first ~~six~~nine months of 2009 to ~~2.28%~~2.15% compared to ~~3.40%~~3.25% in the first ~~six~~nine months of 2008.

The rate paid on wholesale funding, consisting of Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago advances, notes payable, subordinated notes, other borrowings and junior subordinated debentures, decreased to ~~4.37%~~4.38% in the first ~~six~~nine months of 2009 compared to ~~4.53%~~4.43% in the first ~~half~~nine months of 2008. The Company utilizes certain borrowing sources to fund the additional capital requirements of the ~~Banks,~~banks, manage capital, manage interest rate risk position and for general corporate purposes.

The higher level of net interest income recorded in the first ~~half~~nine months of 2009 compared to the first ~~half~~nine months of 2008 was primarily attributable to ~~increasing credit spreads~~a $36.4 million decrease in interest expense on ~~new loan volumes~~interest-bearing deposits as the Company was able to raise and ~~the ability to raise~~retain interest-bearing deposits at ~~more reasonable rates and strong earning asset growth.~~lower rates. Average earning asset growth of ~~$1.4~~$1.5 billion in the first ~~half~~nine months of 2009 compared to the ~~first half~~same period of 2008 was comprised of ~~$980.9 million~~$1.1 billion of loan growth and ~~$377.5~~$430.4 million of liquid management asset growth. This growth was primarily funded by a ~~$983.1 million~~$1.2 billion increase in the average balances of interest-bearing liabilities and an increase in the average balance of net free funds of ~~$373.3~~$343.8 million. Management believes opportunities ~~during 2009~~remain for ~~continuing to increase~~increasing credit spreads in commercial and commercial real estate loan portfolios and for lower rates from the ~~loan portfolio and favorable repricing~~re-pricing of maturing retail certificates of ~~deposit~~deposits, both of which should help offset the effects of any additional interest rate spread compression on variable rate retail deposits and the unprecedented competitive retail deposit pricing given the current economic conditions that have hinderedcontribute to continued net interest margin expansion.

Analysis of Changes in Tax-equivalent Net Interest Income

The following table presents an analysis of the changes in the Company’s tax-equivalent net interest income comparing the three-month periods ended ~~June 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, the six-month periods ended June~~September 30, 2009 and June 30, 2009, the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008 and the three-month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and ~~June~~September 30, 2008. The reconciliations set forth the changes in the tax-equivalent net interest income as a result of changes in volumes, changes in rates and differing number of days in each period:


	Second Quarter		First Six Months			Second Quarter		Third Quarter		First Nine Months			Third Quarter
	of 2009		of 2009			of 2009		of 2009		of 2009			of 2009
	Compared to		Compared to			Compared to		Compared to		Compared to			Compared to
	First Quarter		First Six Months			Second Quarter		Second Quarter		First Nine Months			Third Quarter
(Dollars in thousands)	of 2009		of 2008			of 2008		of 2009		of 2008			of 2008
Tax-equivalent net interest income for comparative period	$	65,402	$	122,457		$	59,992	$	73,067	$	183,714		$	61,257
Change due to mix and growth of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities (volume)		2,598		23,097			12,145		4,849		37,065			16,013
Change due to interest rate fluctuations (rate)		4,348		(6,409	)		930		9,468		6,541			10,908
Change due to number of days in each period		719		(676	)		—		794		(674	)		—

Tax-equivalent net interest income for the period ended June 30, 2009	$	73,067	$	138,469		$	73,067
Tax-equivalent net interest income for the period ended September 30, 2009								$	88,178	$	226,646		$	88,178

Non-interest Income

For the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009, non-interest income totaled ~~$45.5~~$150.7 million, an increase of ~~$11.8~~$128.6 million ~~or 35%,~~ compared to the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008. The increase was primarily attributable to the bargain purchase gain recognized on the life insurance premium finance loan acquisition, the securitization transaction sponsored by FIFC, an increase in mortgage banking revenue and trading income offset by lower levels of fees from covered call options. For the first ~~six~~nine months of 2009, non-interest income totaled ~~$81.9~~$232.6 million, an increase of ~~$23.7~~$152.3 million ~~or 41%,~~ compared to the first ~~six~~nine months of 2008. ~~This increase was primarily attributable to increases in mortgage banking revenue and trading income offset by lower levels of fees from covered call options.~~

The following table presents non-interest income by category for the periods presented:


	Three Months Ended											Three Months Ended
	June 30,					$			%			September 30,					$			%
(Dollars in thousands)	2009		2008			Change			Change			2009			2008		Change			Change
Brokerage	$	4,280	$	4,948			(668	)		(14	)	$	4,593		$	4,354		239			5
Trust and asset management		2,603		2,823			(220	)		(8	)		2,908			2,690		218			8

Total wealth management		6,883		7,771			(888	)		(11	)		7,501			7,044		457			6


Mortgage banking		22,596		7,536			15,060			200			13,204			4,488		8,716			194
Service charges on deposit accounts		3,183		2,565			618			24			3,447			2,674		773			29
Gain on sales of premium finance receivables		196		566			(370	)		(65	)		3,629			456		3,173			NM
Gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net		1,540		(140	)		1,680		NM
(Losses) gains on available-for-sale securities, net													(412	)		920		(1,332	)		(145	)
Gain on bargain purchase													113,062			—		113,062			NM
Other:
Fees from covered call options		—		12,083			(12,083	)		(100	)		—			2,723		(2,723	)		(100	)
Bank Owned Life Insurance		565		851			(286	)		(34	)		552			478		74			15
Trading income		8,274		76			8,198		NM				6,236			286		5,950			NM
Administrative services		454		755			(301	)		(40	)		527			803		(276	)		(34	)
Miscellaneous		1,761		1,541			220			14			2,934			2,258		676			30

Total other		11,054		15,306			(4,252	)		(28	)		10,249			6,548		3,701			57


Total non-interest income	$	45,452	$	33,604			11,848			35		$	150,680		$	22,130		128,550			NM

Wealth management is comprised of the trust and asset management revenue of ~~WHTC~~Wayne Hummer Trust Company and the asset management fees, brokerage commissions, trading commissions and insurance product commissions at ~~WHI~~Wayne Hummer Investments and ~~WHAMC.~~Wayne Hummer Asset Management Company. Wealth management totaled ~~$6.9~~$7.5 million in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 ~~a decrease of $888,000, or 11%, from $7.8~~and $7.0 million in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008. ~~Decreased~~Increased asset valuations due to the recent equity market ~~declines over the past 12 months~~improvements have ~~hindered the~~helped revenue growth from trust and asset management activities. ~~Continued uncertainties surrounding the equity markets overall have slowed the growth of the brokerage component of wealth management revenue.~~ With equity markets improving in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009, ~~coupled with the AIP transaction during the current quarter,~~ wealth management revenue increased ~~$957,000,~~$618,000, or ~~65%~~36% on an annualized basis, over the ~~first~~second quarter of 2009. On a year-to-date basis, wealth management revenue totaled ~~$12.8~~$20.3 million, down ~~$2.8~~$2.4 million, or ~~18%~~10% when compared to the same period in 2008.

Mortgage banking includes revenue from activities related to originating, selling and servicing residential real estate loans for the secondary market. For the quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009, this revenue source totaled ~~$22.6~~$13.2 million, an increase of ~~$15.1~~$8.7 million when compared to the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008. The increase was primarily attributable to ~~$14.4~~$9.3 million from gains recognized on loans sold to the secondary market ~~and $683,000~~offset by $601,000 from changes in the fair market value of mortgage servicing rights, valuation fluctuations of mortgage banking derivatives, fair value accounting for certain residential mortgage loans held for sale and increased recourse obligation reserves for loans previously sold. Future growth of mortgage banking is impacted by the interest rate environment and current residential housing conditions and will continue to be dependent upon both. ~~Mortgage loans~~Mortgages originated and sold totaled over $960 million in the third quarter of 2009 compared to $1.5 billion in the second quarter of 2009 ~~compared to $1.2 billion in the first quarter of 2009~~ and ~~$484~~$344 million in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008. The positive impact of the PMP transaction, completed at the end of 2008, contributed to mortgage banking revenue growth in ~~both~~all quarters of 2009. On a year-to-date basis, mortgage banking revenue totaled ~~$38.8~~$52.0 million, increasing ~~$25.2~~$33.9 million when compared to the same period in 2008. ~~The year-to-date increase was primarily attributable~~Mortgages originated and sold totaled over $3.7 billion in the first nine months of 2009 compared to ~~$24.3 million from gains recognized on loans sold to~~over $1.3 billion in the ~~secondary market.~~first nine months of 2008.

Service charges on deposit accounts totaled ~~$3.2~~$3.4 million for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009, an increase of ~~$618,000,~~$773,000, or ~~24%~~29%, when compared to the same quarter of 2008. On a year-to-date basis, service charges on deposit accounts totaled ~~$6.2~~$9.6 million, an increase of ~~$1.2~~$2.0 million, or ~~25%~~26%, when compared to the same period of 2008. The majority of deposit service charges relates to customary fees on overdrawn accounts and returned ~~items.~~items and has increased in 2009 as a result of the growth of the Company’s deposit base. The level of service charges received is substantially below peer group levels, as management believes in the philosophy of providing high quality service without encumbering that service with numerous activity charges.

~~Gain~~Wintrust recognized $3.6 million of gains on ~~sales~~the sale and securitization of ~~premium finance receivables results from the Company’s sales of premium finance receivables to unrelated third parties. Wintrust did not sell any~~ premium finance receivables in the ~~second~~third quarter of ~~2009 but recognized $196,000~~2009. See the “Overview – Specialty Finance” section of ~~gains in~~this report and Note 8 of the ~~second quarter~~Financial Statements presented under Item 1 of ~~2009~~this report for details on ~~clean-up calls~~the securitization of ~~previous sales. Wintrust~~premium finance receivables. FIFC sold ~~$69.5~~$33.6 million of premium finance receivables in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008, recognizing ~~$566,000~~$456,000 of net gains. ~~Sales~~As a result of ~~these receivables~~paydowns of loans in ~~future quarters are dependent upon market conditions impacting sales of these loans as well as liquidity and capital management considerations. Subject to market and other conditions,~~the revolving securitization facility, the Company ~~intends to pursue a sale of approximately $700~~anticipates transferring over $300 million of property and casualty premium finance ~~receivables.~~receivables to the securitization facility during the fourth quarter of 2009 and additional gains related thereto may be recognized.

The Company recognized ~~$1.5 million~~$412,000 of net ~~gains~~losses on available-for-sale securities in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 compared to net ~~losses~~gains of ~~$140,000~~$920,000 in the prior year quarter. For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company recognized net losses on available-for-sale securities of ~~$498,000~~$910,000 and ~~$1.5 million,~~$553,000, respectively. Net gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities include other-than-temporary (“OTTI”) charges recognized in income. In the ~~first~~third quarter of 2009, the Company recognized ~~$2.1 million~~$472,000 of OTTI charges on ~~certain~~a corporate ~~debt investment securities. There were no~~note of a financial issuer. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recognized $2.6 million of OTTI ~~charges recognized in the second quarter of 2009.~~charges. For the quarter and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008, the Company recognized ~~$212,000~~$2.1 and ~~$2.1~~$4.2 million, respectively, of OTTI charges on certain corporate debt investment securities. See Note 45 of the Financial Statements presented under Item 1 of this report for details of OTTI charges and the adoption of a new accounting standard related the presentation and disclosure of OTTI charges.

4755

The bargain purchase gain resulted from the acquisition of the life insurance premium finance receivable portfolio. See the “Overview – Specialty Finance” section of this report and Note 3 of the Financial Statements presented under Item 1 of this report for a discussion of the transaction. The following table summarizes the components of this transaction:

Purchased Loan Portfolio
Summary of Acquisition


														Credit
														discounts -
	Gross		Net					Bargain						non-
	loan		purchase		Total			purchase			Accretable			accretable
(Dollars in thousands)	balance		price		discounts			gain⁽¹⁾			discounts			discounts
Loans purchased on July 28, 2009	$	949,322	$	685,306	$	(264,016	)	$	(150,646	)	$	(74,837	)	$	(38,533	)
- Initial bargain purchase gain									99,949			—			—
- Accretion (effective yield method)									—			3,530			—
- Impact of accounts clearing escrow⁽²⁾									11,313			—			—
- Impact of accounts prepaid									—			3,925			2,338
- Non-accretable transfer to accretable									—			—			—
Remaining balances atSeptember 30, 2009⁽³⁾								$	(39,384	)	$	(67,382	)	$	(36,195	)


Loans purchased on October 2, 2009⁽⁴⁾	$	83,393	$	60,460	$	(22,933	)	$	(14,461	)	$	(5,742	)	$	(2,730	)


(1)		An additional $1.8 million of gain was recognized in conjunction with the establishment of a customer list intangible asset. .

(2)		Third party consents were received and funds were released from escrow.

(3)		The remaining unrecognized bargain purchase gain is recognizable subject to the receipt of required third party consents. .

(4)		None of the purchase price proceeds from the October 2, 2009 purchase are held in escrow. The bargain purchase gain is fully recognizable in the fourth quarter of 2009.

Other non-interest income for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 totaled ~~$11.1~~$10.2 million, ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$4.2~~$3.7 million, ~~or 28%,~~ compared to ~~$15.3~~$6.5 million in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008. Trading income increased ~~$8.2~~$6.0 million ~~in the current quarter~~ as the Company recognized ~~$8.3~~$6.2 million in trading income resulting primarily from the increase in ~~market~~fair value of certain collateralized mortgage obligations. The Company purchased these securities at a significant discount to par value during the first quarter of 2009. These securities have increased in value since their purchase due to market spreads tightening, increased mortgage prepayments due to favorable mortgage rate environment and the resultant refinancing activity taking place in the market, and lower than projected default rates. ~~More than~~Partially offsetting the increase in trading income were fees from certain covered call option transactions decreasing by ~~$12.1~~$2.7 million, as no income was recorded from this activity in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009. Historically, compression in the net interest margin was effectively offset, as has consistently been the case, by the Company’s covered call strategy. Management has been able to effectively use the proceeds from selling covered call options to offset net interest margin compression and administers such sales in a coordinated process with the Company’s overall asset/liability management. The covered call option contracts are written against certain U.S. Treasury and agency securities held in the Company’s portfolio for liquidity and other purposes. In the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009, as the Company’s net interest margin expanded, management chose to not engage in covered call option activity due to lower than acceptable security yields which resulted in the elimination of revenue from the Company’s covered call strategy. On a year-to-date basis, other non-interest income totaled ~~$24.1~~$34.3 million, an increase of ~~$333,000,~~$4.0 million, or 1%13%, when compared to the same period of 2008. Trading income increased ~~$16.9~~$22.9 million in the first ~~six~~nine months of 2009 when compared to the same period in 2008 primarily from the increase in market value of certain collateralized mortgage obligations discussed above. Offsetting this increase were lower fees from certain covered call option transactions of ~~$16.9~~$19.6 million in the first ~~six~~nine months of 2009 when compared to the same period in 2008 as a result of lower than acceptable security yields in 2009.

4856

Non-interest Expense

Non-interest expense for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 totaled ~~$84.2~~$92.6 million and increased approximately ~~$19.0~~$29.4 million, or ~~29%~~46%, from the ~~second~~third quarter 2008 total of ~~$65.2~~$63.2 million. On a year-to-date basis, non-interest expense for 2009 totaled ~~$161.2~~$253.8 million and increased ~~$33.2~~$62.5 million, or ~~26%,~~33% over the same period in 2008.

The following table presents non-interest expense by category for the periods presented:


	Three Months Ended										Three Months Ended
	June 30,				$			%			September 30,				$			%
(Dollars in thousands)	2009		2008		Change			Change			2009		2008		Change			Change
Salaries and employee benefits	$	46,015	$	36,976		9,039			24		$	48,088	$	35,823		12,265			34
Equipment		4,015		4,048		(33	)		(1	)		4,069		4,050		19			1
Occupancy, net		5,608		5,438		170			3			5,884		5,666		218			4
Data processing		3,216		2,918		298			10			3,226		2,850		376			13
Advertising and marketing		1,420		1,368		52			4			1,488		1,343		145			11
Professional fees		2,871		2,227		644			29			4,089		2,195		1,894			86
Amortization of other intangible assets		676		779		(103	)		(13	)		677		781		(104	)		(13	)
Other:
Commissions — 3^rd party brokers		791		997		(206	)		(21	)
Commissions – 3^rd party brokers												843		985		(142	)		(14	)
Postage		1,146		1,055		91			9			1,139		1,067		72			7
Stationery and supplies		793		756		37			5			769		750		19			3
FDIC insurance		9,121		1,289		7,832		NM				4,334		1,344		2,990			NM
OREO expenses, net		1,072		837		235			28			10,243		487		9,756			NM
Miscellaneous		7,501		6,493		1,008			16			7,714		5,858		1,856			32

Total other		20,424		11,427		8,997			79			25,042		10,491		14,551			139


Total non-interest expense	$	84,245	$	65,181		19,064			29		$	92,563	$	63,199		29,364			46

mortgage loan origination ~~volumes.~~volumes, $11.6 million primarily related to acquisitions and the remainder being generally related to increases in base salaries.

The combined equipment and occupancy expense for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 was ~~$9.6~~$10.0 million, an increase of ~~$137,000,~~$237,000, or 1%2%, compared to the same period of 2008. On a year-to-date basis, the combined equipment and occupancy expense was ~~$19.8~~$29.7 million in 2009, an increase of ~~$472,000,~~$708,000, or 2%, compared to the same period of 2008.

Professional fees include legal, audit and tax fees, external loan review costs and normal regulatory exam assessments. Professional fees for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 were ~~$2.9~~$4.1 million, an increase of ~~$644,000,~~$1.9 million, or ~~29%~~86%, compared to the same period in 2008. On a year-to-date basis, professional fees were ~~$5.8~~$9.8 million, an increase of ~~$1.5~~$3.4 million, or ~~34%~~52%, compared to the same period in 2008. These increases are primarily a result of increased legal costs related to non-performing ~~assets.~~assets and acquisition related activities.

FDIC insurance totaled ~~$9.1~~$4.3 million in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009, an increase of ~~$7.8~~$3.0 million compared to $1.3 million in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008. On a year-to-date basis, FDIC insurance totaled ~~$12.1~~$16.5 million in 2009, an increase of ~~$9.5~~$12.5 million compared to ~~$2.6~~$3.9 million in 2008. The increase in FDIC insurance rates at the beginning ~~of 2009, the industry-wide special assessment on financial institutions in the second quarter~~ of 2009 and growth in the assessable deposit base contributed to the significant increases in FDIC insurance costs for the third quarter of 2009 while the first nine months of 2009 were also negatively impacted by the industry-wide special assessment on financial institutions in the second quarter of 2009

OREO expenses include all costs related with obtaining, maintaining and ~~the first six months~~selling of ~~2009.~~

~~Other~~other real estate owned ~~(“OREO”) expenses~~properties. This expense totaled $10.2 million in the ~~current~~third quarter ~~and~~of 2009, an increase of $9.8 million compared to $487,000 in the ~~year-to-period ended June 30,~~third quarter of 2008. On a year-to-date basis, OREO expenses totaled $13.7 million in 2009, ~~increased $235,000 and $3.0~~an increase of $12.3 million ~~respectively,~~ compared to ~~the same periods~~$1.4 million in ~~the prior year.~~2008. These increases are primarily due to the higher number of OREO ~~operating expenses~~properties and losses on sales of OREO properties in 2009.

Miscellaneous expense includes expenses such as ATM expenses, correspondent bank charges, directors’ fees, telephone, travel and entertainment, corporate insurance, dues and subscriptions and lending origination costs that are not deferred. Miscellaneous expenses in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 increased ~~$1.0~~$1.9 million, or ~~16%~~32%, compared to the same period in the prior year. On year-to-date basis, miscellaneous expenses increased ~~$1.1~~$3.4 million, or 9%19%, compared to the same period in the prior year. The quarter and year-to-date increases are attributable to the general growth in the Company’s business.

Income Taxes

The Company recorded income tax expense of ~~$3.5~~$22.6 million for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009, compared to ~~$6.2~~a tax benefit of $2.1 million for ~~the~~ same period of 2008. ~~The effective tax rate was 34.8% and 35.6% in the second quarter of 2009 and 2008, respectively.~~ For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, income tax expense totaled ~~$6.9~~$29.5 million for 2009 and ~~$11.5~~$9.4 million for 2008. The effective tax rate was ~~34.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2009~~39.6% and ~~35.3%~~33.6% for the first ~~six~~nine months of ~~2008.~~2009 and 2008, respectively. The higher effective tax rate in the 2009 year-to-date period is primarily a result of a higher level of pretax net income in the period relative to tax-advantaged income than in the 2008 year-to-date period.

The community banking segment’s net interest income for the quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 totaled ~~$69.6~~$84.5 million as compared to ~~$58.0~~$59.0 million for the same period in 2008, an increase of ~~$11.6~~$25.5 million, or ~~20%~~43%. On a year-to-date basis, net interest income totaled ~~$131.4~~$215.9 million for the first ~~six~~nine months of 2009, an increase of ~~$12.8~~$38.3 million, or ~~11%~~22%, as compared to the ~~$118.6~~$177.6 million recorded last year. These increases were primarily attributable to ~~increasing credit spreads on new loan volumes~~the acquisition of the life insurance premium finance portfolio and ~~the ability to raise~~lower costs of interest-bearing ~~deposits at more reasonable rates and strong earning asset growth.~~deposits. The community banking segment’s non-interest income totaled ~~$28.2~~$18.9 million in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009, an increase of ~~$3.8~~$4.6 million, or ~~15%~~32%, when compared to the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008 total of ~~$24.4~~$14.3 million. Non-interest income increased ~~24%~~27% to ~~$51.7~~$70.6 million in the first ~~six~~nine months of 2009 compared to the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008. These increases were primarily attributable to an increase in mortgage banking revenue offset by lower levels of fees from covered call options. The community banking segment’s net ~~income~~loss for the quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 totaled ~~$4.7~~$35.4 million, a decrease of ~~$10.3~~$36.7 million, ~~or 69%,~~ as compared to the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008 ~~total~~net income of ~~$14.9~~$1.4 million. ~~After-tax profit~~The net loss for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009, totaled ~~$10.5~~$24.9 million, a decrease of ~~$19.0~~$55.8 million, or ~~64%~~181%, as compared to the prior year total net income of ~~$29.5~~$30.9 million. ~~These decreases were~~The decrease is primarily ~~the result of a higher~~due to recording an additional provision for ~~credit~~loan losses into accommodate for the ~~second~~additional net charge-offs during the quarter and ~~first six months~~the expense related to write downs of ~~2009 as compared to the same periods in the prior year.~~other real estate owned.

Net interest income for the specialty finance segment totaled ~~$19.2~~$33.7 million for the quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009, compared to $17.1 million for the same period in 2008, an increase of ~~$2.1~~$16.7 million or ~~12%~~98%. On a year-to-date basis, net interest income totaled ~~$38.2~~$71.9 million for the first ~~six~~nine months of 2009, an increase of ~~$3.5~~$20.2 million, or ~~10%~~39%, as compared to the ~~$34.7~~$51.7 million recorded last year. These increases are ~~a result~~attributable to the impact of ~~higher average balances of~~the life insurance premium finance ~~receivables in 2009 as~~loan purchase and the ~~Company has not sold premium finance receivables~~ability to ~~unrelated third parties since the second quarter of 2008.~~raise and retain interest-bearing deposits at lower rates. The specialty finance segment’s non-interest income totaled ~~$650,000~~$114.3 million for the quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009, compared to $1.3 million for the same period in 2008, ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$671,000 or 51%.~~$113.0 million. Non-interest income ~~decreased $1.7~~increased $111.3 million to ~~$1.5~~$115.8 million in the first ~~six~~nine months of 2009 as compared to the same period in the prior year. The ~~decreases relate primarily to lower gains on~~increase in non-interest income in 2009 is a result of the ~~sale~~bargain purchase gain from the acquisition of the life insurance premium finance ~~receivables to unrelated third parties since there have been no sales since~~receivable portfolio. See the ~~second quarter~~“Overview – Specialty Finance” section of ~~2008.~~this report and Note 3 of the Financial Statements presented under Item 1 of this report for a discussion of the bargain purchase. Net after-tax profit of the specialty finance segment totaled ~~$8.1~~$120.4 million and $7.9 million for the quarters ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and ~~2008.~~2008 respectively. The specialty finance segment’s after-tax profit for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009, totaled ~~$16.3~~$136.7 million, a ~~decrease~~increase of ~~$336,000,~~$112.2 million, or 2%458%, as compared to the prior year total of ~~$16.6~~$24.5 million.

The wealth management segment reported net interest income of ~~$7.0~~$7.8 million for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 compared to $4.5 million in the same quarter of 2008. Net interest income is comprised of the net interest earned on brokerage customer receivables at WHI and an allocation of the net interest income earned by the community banking segment on non-interest bearing and interest-bearing wealth management customer account balances on deposit at the ~~Banks~~banks (“wealth management deposits”). The allocated net interest income included in this segment’s profitability was ~~$6.9~~$7.6 million ($~~4.3~~4.7 million after tax) in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 compared to $4.2 million ($2.6 million after tax) in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008. The increase ~~in net interest income was primarily a result of~~is mainly due to the recent equity market improvements that have helped revenue growth ~~in average wealth~~from trust and asset management ~~deposits.~~activities. This segment recorded non-interest income of ~~$9.6~~$10.4 million for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 compared to ~~$10.0~~$8.8 million for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008. The wealth management segment’s net income totaled ~~$3.7~~$4.4 million for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 compared to net income of ~~$2.9~~$2.4 million for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008. This increase is a result of the improvement of equity markets in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009, coupled with the ~~acquisition~~purchase of ~~AIP~~certain assets and liabilities of Advanced Investment Partners, LLC during the ~~current quarter.~~second quarter of 2009. On a year-to-date basis, net interest income totaled ~~$13.5~~$21.3 million for the first ~~six~~nine months of 2009, an increase of ~~$4.2~~$7.5 million or ~~45%~~54%, as compared to the ~~$9.3~~$13.8 million recorded last year. The allocated net interest income included in

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Total assets were ~~$11.4~~$12.1 billion at ~~June~~September 30, 2009, representing an increase of ~~$1.4~~$2.3 billion, or ~~15%~~23%, when compared to ~~June~~September 30, 2008 and ~~$540.6~~$776.5 million, or ~~20%~~27% on an annualized basis, when compared to ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009. Total funding, which includes deposits, all notes and advances, including the junior subordinated debentures, was $10.6 billion at September 30, 2009, $8.9 billion at September 30, 2008 and $10.2 billion at June 30, ~~2009, $8.9 billion at June 30, 2008 and $9.6 billion at March 31,~~ 2009. See Notes ~~4-8~~5, 6, 10, 11 and 12 of the Financial Statements presented under Item 1 of this report for additional period-end detail on the Company’s interest-earning assets and funding liabilities.

Interest-Earning Assets

The following table sets forth, by category, the composition of average earning asset balances and the relative percentage of total average earning assets for the periods presented:


	Three Months Ended															Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2009					March 31, 2009					June 30, 2008					September 30, 2009					June 30, 2009					September 30, 2008
(Dollars in thousands)	Balance		Percent			Balance		Percent			Balance		Percent			Balance		Percent			Balance		Percent			Balance		Percent
Loans:
Commercial and commercial real estate	$	4,987,587		49	%	$	4,826,474		49	%	$	4,549,505		52	%	$	5,070,811		47	%	$	4,987,587		49	%	$	4,612,881		52	%
Home equity		919,667		9			909,948		9			732,218		8			918,576		9			919,667		9			799,595		9
Residential real estate⁽¹⁾		493,546		5			451,127		5			357,480		4			499,708		5			493,546		5			341,106		4
Premium finance receivables⁽²⁾		1,521,373		15			1,410,727		14			1,131,107		13			1,938,645		18			1,521,373		15			1,216,153		14
Indirect consumer loans		143,516		1			165,143		2			224,538		3			124,552		1			143,516		1			212,614		2
Other loans		146,883		2			161,430		2			163,469		2			112,989		1			146,883		2			161,496		2

Total loans, net of unearned income(3)	$	8,212,572		81	%	$	7,924,849		81	%	$	7,158,317		82	%	$	8,665,281		81	%	$	8,212,572		81	%	$	7,343,845		83	%
Liquidity management assets⁽³⁾⁽⁴⁾		1,851,179		19			1,839,161		19			1,543,795		18			2,078,330		19			1,851,179		19			1,544,465		17
Other earning assets⁽⁴⁾⁽⁵⁾		22,694		—			22,128		—			22,519		—			24,874		—			22,694		—			21,687		—

Total average earning assets	$	10,086,445		100	%	$	9,786,138		100	%	$	8,724,631		100	%	$	10,768,485		100	%	$	10,086,445		100	%	$	8,909,997		100	%

Total average assets	$	11,037,468				$	10,724,966				$	9,682,454				$	11,797,520				$	11,037,468				$	9,881,554

Total average earning assets to total average assets				91	%				91	%				90	%				91	%				91	%				90	%

Total average loans during the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 increased ~~$1.1~~$1.3 billion, or ~~15%~~18%, over the previous year ~~second~~third quarter. In the first six months of 2009, more than $5.6 billion of credit was extended to new and existing borrowers subsequent to the U.S. Treasury Department’s capital investment in December 2008 as part of the Capital Purchase Program. Average premium finance receivables increased 59%, residential real estate loans increased ~~38%, premium finance receivables increased 35%~~47%, home equity loans increased ~~26%~~15%, and commercial and commercial real estate loans increased 10% in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 compared to the average balances in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008. The increase in average residential real estate loans is a result of higher ~~originations by WMC.~~mortgage loan originations. As a result of economic conditions, the Company has been actively managing its home equity portfolio to ensure that diligent pricing, appraisal and other underwriting activities continue to exist. The Company has not sacrificed asset quality or pricing standards to grow outstanding loan balances.

The increase in the average balance of premium finance receivables is a result of FIFC’s purchase of a portfolio of domestic life insurance premium finance loans in July 2009. After giving effect to post-closing adjustments, an aggregate unpaid principal loan balance of $949.3 million was purchased for $685.3 million in cash.

Additionally, the majority of premium finance receivables, commercial and life insurance, are purchased by the banks in order to more fully utilize their lending capacity as these loans generally provide the banks with higher yields than alternative investments. Historically, FIFC originations of commercial premium finance receivables that were not purchased by the banks were sold to unrelated third parties with servicing retained. However, during the third quarter of 2009, FIFC initially sold $695 million in commercial premium finance receivables to our indirect subsidiary, FIFC Premium Funding I, LLC, which in turn sold $600 million in aggregate principal amount of notes backed by such commercial premium finance receivables in a securitization transaction sponsored by FIFC. The Company ~~not selling~~sold $69.5 million of commercial premium finance receivables to an unrelated third party in the second quarter of ~~2009. The Company sold $69.5 million of premium finance receivables to an unrelated third party in the second quarter of~~ 2008. Currently, the receivables originated by FIFC are sold to the Banks and retained in their portfolios. The level of premium finance receivables sold to unrelated third parties depends in large part on the capacity of the Banks to retain such loans in their portfolio and therefore, it is possible that sales of these receivables may occur in the future.

As discussed in the “Overview and Strategy” section of this report, in the third quarter of 2008, the Company ceased the origination of indirect automobile loans. Therefore, the balance of indirect consumer loans will continue to decrease in future periods.

Liquidity management assets include available-for-sale securities, interest earning deposits with banks, federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements. The balances of these assets can fluctuate based on management’s ongoing effort to manage liquidity and for asset liability management purposes.

Other earning assets include brokerage customer receivables and trading account securities at WHI. Trading securities are also held at the Wintrust corporate level. In the normal course of business, WHI activities involve the execution, settlement, and financing of various securities transactions. WHI’s customer securities activities are transacted on either a cash or margin basis. In margin transactions, WHI, under an agreement with the out-sourced securities firm, extends credit to its customers, subject to various regulatory and internal margin requirements, collateralized by cash and securities in customer’s accounts. In connection with these activities, WHI executes and the out-sourced firm clears customer transactions relating to the sale of securities not yet purchased, substantially all of which are transacted on a margin basis subject to individual exchange regulations. Such transactions may expose WHI to off-balance-sheet risk, particularly in volatile trading markets, in the event margin requirements are not sufficient to fully cover losses that customers may incur. In the event a customer fails to satisfy its obligations, WHI under an agreement with the outsourced securities firm, may be required to purchase or sell financial instruments at prevailing market prices to fulfill the customer’s obligations. WHI seeks to control the risks associated with its customers’ activities by requiring customers to maintain margin collateral in compliance with various regulatory and internal guidelines. WHI monitors required margin levels daily and, pursuant to such guidelines, requires customers to deposit additional collateral or to reduce positions when necessary.

Average earning assets for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 increased ~~$1.4~~$1.5 billion, or ~~16%~~17%, over the first ~~six~~nine months of 2008. The ratio of total average earning assets as a percent of total average assets for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 increased slightly to 91% from 90% in the prior year period. Total average loans increased by ~~$980.9 million,~~$1.1 billion, or ~~14%~~15%, in the first ~~six~~nine months of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008. The growth of loans in 2009 is the result of the Company’s continued business development efforts on its core loan portfolios, higher mortgage originations ~~by WMC~~ and ~~no sales~~the purchase of a portfolio of domestic life insurance premium finance ~~receivables since the second quarter of 2008.~~loans in July 2009. Average liquidity management assets for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 increased ~~$377.5~~$430.4 million, or ~~26%~~29%, over the first ~~six~~nine months of 2008. The balances of these assets fluctuate frequently based on deposit inflows, the level of other funding sources and loan demand.

Deposits

Total deposits at ~~June~~September 30, 2009, were ~~$9.2~~$9.8 billion and increased ~~$1.4~~$2.0 billion, or ~~18%~~26%, compared to total deposits at ~~June~~September 30, 2008. See Note 610 to the financial statements of Item 1 of this report for a summary of period end deposit balances.

Deposit Maturity Analysis
As of September 30, 2009


											Weighted-
	Non-										Average
	Interest		Savings								Rate of
	Bearing		And				Time				Maturing Time
(Dollars in	And		Money		Wealth		Certificates		Total		Certificates
thousands)	NOW⁽¹⁾		Market⁽¹⁾		Mgt^(1) (2)		of Deposit		Deposits		of Deposit
1 – 3 months	$	2,087,357	$	1,981,467	$	615,898	$	1,392,088	$	6,076,810		2.38	%
4 – 6 months		—		—		121,294		851,034		972,328		2.46
7 – 9 months		—		—		—		720,427		720,427		2.61
10 – 12 months		—		—		—		605,530		605,530		2.39
13 – 18 months		—		—		198,548		668,256		866,804		2.67
19 – 24 months		—		—		—		284,965		284,965		3.54
24+ months		—		—		—		320,299		320,299		3.57

Total	$	2,087,357	$	1,981,467	$	935,740	$	4,842,599	$	9,847,163		2.62	%


(1)		Balances of non-contractual maturity deposits are shown as maturing in the earliest time frame. These deposits do not have contractual maturities and re-price in varying degrees to changes in overall interest rates.

(2)		Wealth management deposit balances from unaffiliated companies are shown maturing in the period in which the current contractual obligation to hold these funds matures.

The following table sets forth, by category, the composition of average deposit balances and the relative percentage of total average deposits for the periods presented:


	Three Months Ended															Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2009					March 31, 2009					June 30, 2008					September 30, 2009					June 30, 2009					September 30, 2008
(Dollars in thousands)	Balance		Percent			Balance		Percent			Balance		Percent			Balance		Percent			Balance		Percent			Balance		Percent
Non-interest bearing	$	754,479		9	%	$	733,911		9	%	$	663,526		9	%	$	775,202		8	%	$	754,479		9	%	$	678,651		9	%
NOW accounts		1,052,901		12			1,061,271		12			1,043,670		14			1,120,567		12			1,052,901		12			1,029,800		13
Wealth management deposits		930,855		10			787,913		9			623,805		8			935,968		10			930,855		10			599,945		8
Money market accounts		1,336,147		15			1,243,468		15			843,724		11			1,422,085		15			1,336,147		15			947,033		12
Savings accounts		433,859		5			367,734		4			326,630		4			487,437		5			433,859		5			325,383		4
Time certificates of deposit		4,343,334		49			4,287,493		51			4,068,608		54			4,833,522		50			4,343,334		49			4,224,904		54

Total average deposits	$	8,851,575		100	%	$	8,481,790		100	%	$	7,569,963		100	%	$	9,574,781		100	%	$	8,851,575		100	%	$	7,805,716		100	%

Wealth management deposits are funds from the brokerage customers of ~~WHI,~~Wayne Hummer Investments , the trust and asset management customers of ~~WHTC~~Wayne Hummer Trust Company and brokerage customers from unaffiliated companies which have been placed into deposit accounts of the ~~Banks~~banks (“~~Wealth~~wealth management deposits” in the table above). Consistent with reasonable interest rate risk parameters, the funds have generally been invested in loan production of the ~~Banks~~banks as well as other investments suitable for banks. The ~~Wealth~~average balance of the wealth management deposits increased ~~$307.1~~$336.0 million, or ~~49%~~56%, in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 compared to the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008 primarily a result of the introduction of the Wholesale ~~IBD~~wealth management money market product, which essentially spreads third party customer account balances across the Company’s 15 bank charters and provides them with 15 times the FDIC insurance of a single bank.

Other Funding Sources

Although deposits are the Company’s primary source of funding its interest-earning assets, the Company’s ability to manage the types and terms of deposits is somewhat limited by customer preferences and market competition. As a result, in addition to deposits and the issuance of equity securities and the retention of earnings, the Company uses several other sources to fund its asset base. These sources include short-term borrowings, notes payable, Federal Home Loan Bank advances, subordinated debt and junior subordinated debentures. The Company evaluates the terms and unique characteristics of each source, as well as its asset-liability management position, in determining the use of such funding sources.

Average total interest-bearing funding, from sources other than deposits and including junior subordinated debentures, totaled $1.0 billion in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 compared to $1.2 billion in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008.

The following table sets forth, by category, the composition of average other funding sources for the periods presented:


	Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	June 30,		March 31,		June 30,		September 30,		June 30,		September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2009		2009		2008		2009		2009		2008
Notes payable	$	1,000	$	1,000	$	63,468	$	1,000	$	1,000	$	41,835
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		435,983		435,982		437,642		434,134		435,983		438,983

Other borrowings:
Federal funds purchased		—		4,039		15,767		—		—		7,853
Securities sold under repurchase agreements and other		248,123		296,855		359,895		244,351		248,123		349,223

Total other borrowings		248,123		300,894		375,662		244,351		248,123		357,076


Subordinated notes		66,648		70,000		75,000		65,000		66,648		75,000
Junior subordinated debentures		249,494		249,506		249,594		249,493		249,494		249,552


Total other funding sources	$	1,001,248	$	1,057,382	$	1,201,366	$	993,978	$	1,001,248	$	1,162,446

The Company borrowed funds under three separate subordinated note agreements. The balances of the notes as of ~~June~~September 30, 2009 were $20.0 million, $20.0 million and $25.0 million with maturity dates in 2012, 2013 and 2015, respectively. Each subordinated note requires annual principal payments of $5.0 million beginning in the sixth year of the note and has terms of ten years. These notes qualify as Tier II regulatory capital.

Junior subordinated debentures were issued to nine trusts by the Company and equal the amount of the preferred and common securities issued by the trusts. Junior subordinated debentures, subject to certain limitations, qualify as Tier 1 capital of the Company for regulatory purposes. The amount of junior subordinated debentures and certain other capital elements in excess of those certain limitations could be included in Tier 2 capital, subject to restrictions. Interest expense on these debentures is deductible for tax purposes, resulting in a cost-efficient form of regulatory capital.

See Notes 711, 12 and 818 of the Financial Statements presented under Item 1 of this report for details of period end balances and other information for these various funding sources. There were no material changes outside the ordinary course of business in the Company’s contractual obligations during the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 as compared to December 31, 2008.

Shareholders’ Equity

Total shareholders’ equity was $1.1 billion at ~~June~~September 30, 2009, reflecting an increase of ~~$316.1~~$296.5 million since ~~June~~September 30, 2008 and ~~a decrease of $1.5~~$39.5 million since the end of 2008. The ~~decrease~~increase from December 31, 2008, was the result of ~~$7.9 million in higher net unrealized losses from available-for-sale securities and the mark-to-market adjustment on cash flow hedges, net of tax,~~ net income of ~~$12.9~~$44.9 million less common stock dividends of ~~$4.3~~$6.5 million and preferred stock dividends of ~~$10.0~~$14.7 million offset by ~~$1.6~~$2.2 million of accretion on the preferred stock, ~~$3.4~~$5.1 million credited to surplus for stock-based compensation costs, a ~~$2.4~~$4.3 million increase in equity from the issuance of shares of the Company’s common stock (and related tax benefit) pursuant to various stock compensation plans, and ~~a $309,000 credit to equity for~~$4.2 million in higher net unrealized gains from available-for-sale securities and the ~~cumulative effect~~fair value adjustment ~~from the adoption~~on cash flow hedges, net of ~~a new accounting standard.~~tax.

The following tables reflect various consolidated measures of capital as of the dates presented and the capital guidelines established by the Federal Reserve Bank for a bank holding company:


	June 30,			March 31,			June 30,			September 30,			June 30,			September 30,
	2009			2009			2008			2009			2009			2008
Leverage ratio		7.9	%		8.0	%		7.8	%		7.7	%		7.9	%		8.1	%
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets		8.9			9.1			8.7		9.0				8.9			9.2
Total capital to risk-weighted assets		12.4			12.6			10.2		12.3				12.4			10.7
Total average equity-to-total average assets *		9.7			9.9			7.9		9.1				9.7			7.8

The Company’s Board of Directors approved the first semi-annual dividend on the Company’s common stock in January 2000 and has continued to approve semi-annual dividends since that time; however, our ability to declare a dividend is limited by our financial condition, the terms of our 8.00% non-cumulative perpetual convertible preferred stock, Series A, the terms of our fixed rate cumulative perpetual preferred stock, Series B (the “Series B Preferred Stock”) and by the terms of our credit agreement. In January and July 2009, Wintrust declared semi-annual cash dividends of $0.18 and $0.09 per common share, respectively. In January and July 2008, Wintrust declared semi-annual cash dividends of $0.18 per common share.

See Note 1417 of the Financial Statements presented under Item 1 of this report for details on the Company’s issuance of preferred stock in August 2008 through a private transaction and also in December 2008 under the ~~U.S. Department~~CPP.

Participation in the CPP creates restrictions upon the Company’s ability to increase dividends on its common stock or to repurchase its common stock until three years have elapsed, unless (i) all of the ~~Treasury’s Capital Purchase Program.~~

~~In January and July 2009, Wintrust declared semi-annual cash dividends of $0.18 and $0.09 per common share, respectively. The reduction~~preferred stock issued to the Treasury are redeemed, (ii) all of the ~~semi-annual~~preferred stock issued to the Treasury have been transferred to third parties, or (iii) the Company receives the consent of the Treasury. In addition, the Treasury has the right to appoint two additional directors to the Wintrust board if the Company misses dividend payments for six dividend periods, whether or not consecutive, on the Series B Preferred Stock. Pursuant to the terms of the certificate of designations creating the CPP preferred stock, the Company’s board will be automatically expanded to include such directors, upon the occurrence of the foregoing conditions.

Taking into account the limitation on the payment of dividends in ~~July 2009~~connection with the Series B Preferred Stock, the final determination of timing, amount and payment of dividends is ~~a result~~at the discretion of ~~lower~~the Company’s Board of Directors and will depend on the Company’s earnings, ~~in recent periods. Accordingly, reducing~~financial condition, capital requirements and other relevant factors. Additionally, the ~~dividend results~~payment of dividends is also subject to statutory restrictions and restrictions arising under the terms of the Company’s Trust Preferred Securities offerings and under certain financial covenants in the ~~preservation~~Company’s revolving line of ~~capital to support~~credit. Under the terms of the Company’s ~~growth. In January~~revolving credit facility entered into on October 30, 2009, the Company is prohibited from paying dividends on any equity interests, including its common stock and ~~July 2008, Wintrust declared semi-annual cash dividends of $0.18 per common share.~~preferred stock, if such payments would cause the Company to be in default under its credit facility.

5765

ASSET QUALITY

~~Allowance~~Past Due Loans and Non-Performing Assets

Our ability to manage credit risk depends in large part on our ability to properly identify and manage problem loans. To do so, we operate a credit risk rating system under which our credit management personnel assign a credit risk rating to each loan at the time of origination and review loans on a regular basis to determine each loan’s credit risk rating on a scale of 1 through 9 with higher scores indicating higher risk. The credit risk rating structure used is shown below:


1 Rating —		Minimal Risk (Loss Potential – none or extremely low) (Superior asset quality, excellent liquidity, minimal leverage)

2 Rating —		Modest Risk (Loss Potential demonstrably low) (Very good asset quality and liquidity, strong leverage capacity)

3 Rating —		Average Risk (Loss Potential low but no longer refutable) (Mostly satisfactory asset quality and liquidity, good leverage capacity)

4 Rating —		Above Average Risk (Loss Potential variable, but some potential for deterioration) (Acceptable asset quality, little excess liquidity, modest leverage capacity)

5 Rating —		Management Attention Risk (Loss Potential moderate if corrective action not taken) (Generally acceptable asset quality, somewhat strained liquidity, minimal leverage capacity)

6 Rating —		Special Mention (Loss Potential moderate if corrective action not taken) (Assets in this category are currently protected, potentially weak, but not to the point of substandard classification)

7 Rating —		Substandard (Loss Potential distinct possibility that the bank may sustain some loss) (Must have well defined weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt)

8 Rating —		Doubtful (Loss Potential extremely high) (These assets have all the weaknesses in those classified “substandard” with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of current existing facts, conditions, and values, highly improbable)

9 Rating —		Loss (fully charged-off) (Loans in this category are considered full uncollectible.)

Each loan officer is responsible for monitoring his or her loan portfolio, recommending a credit risk rating for each loan in his or her portfolio and ensuring the credit risk ratings are appropriate. These credit risk ratings are then ratified by the bank’s chief credit officer or the directors’ loan committee. Credit ~~Losses~~risk ratings are determined by evaluating a number of factors including, a borrower’s financial strength, cash flow coverage, collateral protection and guarantees. A third party loan review firm independently reviews a significant portion of the loan portfolio at each of the Company’s subsidiary banks to evaluate the appropriateness of the management-assigned credit risk ratings. These ratings are subject to further review at each of our bank subsidiaries by the applicable regulatory authority, including the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the State of Illinois and the State of Wisconsin and our internal audit staff.

The Company’s Problem Loan Reporting system automatically includes all loans with credit risk ratings of 6, 7 or 8. This system is designed to provide an on-going detailed tracking mechanism for each problem loan. Once management determines that a loan has deteriorated to a point where it has a credit risk rating of 6 or worse, the Company’s Managed Asset Division performs an overall credit and collateral review. As part of this review, all underlying collateral is identified, the valuation methodology analyzed and tracked. As a result of this initial review by the Company’s Managed Asset Division, the credit risk rating is reviewed and a portion of the outstanding loan balance may be deemed uncollectible or an impairment reserve may be established. The Company’s impairment analysis utilizes an independent re-appraisal of the collateral (unless such a third-party evaluation is not possible due to the unique nature of the collateral, such as a closely-held business or thinly traded securities). In the case of commercial real estate collateral, an independent third party appraisal is ordered by the Company’s Real Estate Services Group to determine if there has been any change in the underlying collateral value. These independent appraisals are reviewed by the Real Estate Services Group and often by independent third party valuation experts and may be adjusted depending upon market conditions. An appraisal is ordered at least once a year for these loans, or

more often if market conditions dictate. In the event that the underlying value of the collateral cannot be easily determined, a detailed valuation methodology is prepared by the Managed Asset Division. A summary of this analysis is provided to the directors’ loan committee of the bank which originated the credit for approval of a charge-off, if necessary.

Through the credit risk rating process, loans are reviewed to determine if they are performing in accordance with the original contractual terms. If the borrower has failed to comply with the original contractual terms, further action may be required by the Company, including a downgrade in the credit risk rating, movement to non-accrual status, a charge-off or the establishment of a specific impairment reserve. In the event a collateral shortfall is identified during the credit review process, the Company will work with the borrower for a principal reduction and/or a pledge of additional collateral and/or additional guarantees. In the event that these options are not available, the loan may be subject to a downgrade of the credit risk rating. If we determine that a loan amount or portion thereof, is uncollectible the loan’s credit risk rating is immediately downgraded to an 8 and the uncollectible amount is charged-off. Any loan that has a partial charge-off continues to be assigned a credit risk rating of an 8 for the duration of time that a balance remains outstanding. The Managed Asset Division undertakes a thorough and ongoing analysis to determine if additional impairment and/or charge-offs are appropriate and to begin a workout plan for the credit to minimize actual losses.

If, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due to it according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement, a specific impairment reserve is established. In determining the appropriate charge-off for collateral-dependent loans, the Company considers the results of appraisals for the associated collateral. As a result of the loan-by-loan nature of the Company’s review process, no significant time lapses have occurred during the review process.

The following table ~~presents~~sets forth Wintrust’s non-performing assets at the dates indicated:

Non-performing Loans


	September 30,			June 30,			December 31,			September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2009			2009			2008			2008
Loans past due greater than 90 days and still accruing:
Residential real estate and home equity	$	1,272		$	1,447		$	617		$	1,084
Commercial, consumer and other		23,402			7,860			14,750			6,100
Premium finance receivables – commercial		11,714			14,301			9,339			5,903
Premium finance receivables – life insurance		—			—			—			—
Indirect consumer loans		549			695			679			877

Total past due greater than 90 days and still accruing		36,937			24,303			25,385			13,964


Non-accrual loans:
Residential real estate and home equity		10,885			11,925			6,528			6,214
Commercial, consumer and other		167,008			184,960			91,814			81,997
Premium finance receivables – commercial		16,093			15,806			11,454			10,239
Premium finance receivables – life insurance		—			—			—			—
Indirect consumer loans		736			1,225			913			627

Total non-accrual		194,722			213,916			110,709			99,077


Total non-performing loans:
Residential real estate and home equity		12,157			13,372			7,145			7,298
Commercial, consumer and other		190,410			192,820			106,564			88,097
Premium finance receivables – commercial		27,807			30,107			20,793			16,142
Premium finance receivables – life insurance		—			—			—			—
Indirect consumer loans		1,285			1,920			1,592			1,504

Total non-performing loans	$	231,659			238,219		$	136,094		$	113,041


Total non-performing loans by category as a percent of its own respective category’s period-end balance:
Residential real estate and home equity		1.00	%		1.12	%		0.62	%		0.67	%
Commercial, consumer and other		3.70			3.71			2.16			1.82
Premium finance receivables – commercial		3.70			3.39			1.67			1.39
Premium finance receivables – life insurance		—			—			—			—
Indirect consumer loans		1.11			1.44			0.90			0.75

Total non-performing loans		2.80	%		3.14	%		1.79	%		1.54	%

Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of non-performing loans		41.05	%		35.73	%		51.26	%		58.67	%

As the above table reflects, the Company’s allowance for loan losses (which are discussed below under “Allowance for Loan Losses”) as a ~~summary~~percentage of non-performing loans has generally declined in recent years. For example, at September 30, 2008, the allowance for loan losses as a percentage of non-performing loans was 59%, which declined to 41% at September 30, 2009. Recent increases in the clarity and stability of collateral valuations have increased our ability to immediately recognize a charge-off rather than establishing specific impairment reserves. The stability of collateral valuations has lead to lower specific impairment reserves and increased charge-offs relative to the overall levels of non-performing loans. As non-performing loan balances have increased over the past five quarters, more of the ~~activity~~nonperforming loans in current quarters have had a partial charge-off and have smaller amounts, if any, of specific reserves allocated. This effect has caused the total non-performing loans balance to increase at rate faster than the total allowance for loan losses.

The table below shows the relationship between total non-performing loans (“NPLs”), the specific allowance for loan losses reserved on impaired loans (“Specific reserves”) and the allowance for credit losses (“ACL”):


				Residential			Premium			Premium
	Commercial,			real estate			finance			finance
	consumer			and home			receivable-			receivable-			Indirect
(Dollars in thousands)	and other			equity			commercial			life			consumer			Total
NPLs at December 31, 2008	$	106,564		$	7,145		$	20,793		$	—		$	1,592		$	136,094
Specific reserves at December 31, 2008	$	16,374		$	265		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	16,639

ACL — September 30, 2008 Balance	$	55,945		$	4,899		$	4,121		$	123		$	1,732		$	66,820
Net charge-offs 4Q 2008		(7,472	)		(857	)		(1,131	)		—			(463	)	$	(9,923	)
Provision for credit losses 4Q 2008		11,759			723			1,368			185			421		$	14,456

ACL — December 31, 2008 Balance	$	60,232		$	4,765		$	4,358		$	308		$	1,690		$	71,353



NPLs at March 31, 2009	$	141,355			9,935			22,416			—			2,160		$	175,866
Specific reserves at March 31, 2009	$	22,573			903			—			—			—		$	23,476

Net charge-offs 1Q 2009	$	(7,788	)		(662	)		(1,210	)		—			(332	)	$	(9,992	)
Provision for credit losses 1Q 2009		7,067			5,341			1,442			85			538		$	14,473

ACL — March 31, 2009 Balance	$	59,511		$	9,444		$	4,590		$	393		$	1,896		$	75,834



NPLs at June 30, 2009	$	192,820			13,372			30,107			—			1,920		$	238,219
Specific reserves at June 30, 2009	$	30,678			3,063			—			—			—		$	33,741

Net charge-offs 2Q 2009	$	(9,830	)		(902	)		(1,637	)		—			(429	)	$	(12,798	)
Provision for credit losses 2Q 2009		21,056			1,667			623			154			163		$	23,663

ACL — June 30, 2009 Balance	$	70,737		$	10,209		$	3,576		$	547		$	1,630		$	86,699



*NPLs at September 30, 2009*	$	*190,410*			*12,157*			*27,807*			—			*1,285*		$	*231,659*
*Specific reserves at September 30, 2009*	$	*15,876*			*609*			—			—			—		$	*16,485*

Net charge-offs 3Q 2009	$	(74,676	)		(2,148	)		(2,317	)		—			(526	)	$	(79,667	)
Provision for credit losses 3Q 2009		87,171			2,213			1,862			(291	)		238		$	91,193

ACL — September 30, 2009 Balance	$	83,232		$	10,274		$	3,121		$	256		$	1,342		$	98,225


Premium finance receivables — purchased life loans credit discounts		—			—			—			36,195			—			36,195

Total Credit Reserves	$	83,232		$	10,274		$	3,121		$	36,451		$	1,342		$	134,420



Total Allowance for Credit Losses as a percentage of loans outstanding		1.62	%		0.85	%		0.42	%		—			1.16	%		1.19	%


Total Credit Reserves as a percentage of loans (net of discounts) outstanding		1.62	%		0.85	%		0.42	%		3.37	%		1.16	%		1.62	%

In certain periods, the change in the total allowance for credit losses balance may not have moved proportionately with the ~~periods presented:~~change in the balance of total non-performing loans. Factors causing this, and as reflected in the table above, are:

Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 30, June 30,
(Dollars in thousands) 2009 2008 2009 2008

Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period
$ 74,248 $ 53,758 $ 69,767 $ 50,389
Provision for credit losses
23,663 10,301 38,136 18,856

Charge-offs:

Commercial and commercial real estate loans 9,846 5,430 17,735 9,387
Home equity loans 795 25 1,306 25
Residential real estate loans 108 — 260 219
Premium finance receivables 1,792 913 3,144 1,796
Indirect consumer loans 473 271 834 529
Consumer and other loans 130 202 251 296

Total charge-offs 13,144 6,841 23,530 12,252

Recoveries:

Commercial and commercial real estate loans 107 29 315 69
Home equity loans 1 — 2 —
Residential real estate loans — — — —
Premium finance receivables 155 273 296 400
Indirect consumer loans 44 61 73 107
Consumer and other loans 39 52 54 64

Total recoveries 346 415 740 640

Net charge-offs
(12,798 ) (6,426 ) (22,790 ) (11,612 )

Allowance for loan losses at period end
$ 85,113 $ 57,633 $ 85,113 $ 57,633

Allowance for unfunded loan commitments at period end
$ 1,586 $ 493 $ 1,586 $ 493

Allowance for credit losses at period end
$ 86,699 $ 58,126 $ 86,699 $ 58,126

Annualized net charge-offs by category as a percentage of its own respective category’s average:

Commercial and commercial real estate loans 0.78 % 0.48 % 0.72 % 0.42 %
Home equity loans 0.35 0.01 0.29 0.01
Residential real estate loans 0.09 — 0.11 0.13
Premium finance receivables 0.43 0.23 0.39 0.25
Indirect consumer loans 1.20 0.38 0.99 0.37
Consumer and other loans 0.25 0.37 0.26 0.29

Total loans, net of unearned income 0.63 % 0.36 % 0.57 % 0.33 %

Net charge-offs as a percentage of the provision for loan losses
54.08 % 62.38 % 59.76 % 61.58 %

Loans at period-end
$ 7,595,476 $ 7,153,603
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans at period-end
1.12 % 0.81 %
Allowance for credit losses as a percentage of loans at period-end
1.14 % 0.81 %

	•		Recent increases in the clarity and stability of collateral valuations have increased the Company’s ability to immediately recognize a charge-off rather than establishing specific impairment reserves. The stability of collateral valuations has lead to lower specific impairment reserves and increased charge-offs relative to the overall levels of non-performing loans. This impact is reflected in the third quarter of 2009 results.

	•		Relevant factors that contribute to the determination of adequate general allowance for loan losses reserves are reviewed and updated. These updates could increase/decrease the required reserves depending upon the nature of each change. (Increases to factors impacting the general reserves are reflected in the third and first quarter of 2009 results; historical loss factors for residential land and development loans were increased in the third quarter of 2009 and general risk factors for residential real estate and home equity loans were increased in the first quarter of 2009; and decreases to factors

5869

impacting the general reserves are reflected in the third quarter of 2009 for life insurance premium finance receivables and in the second quarter of 2009 for commercial premium finance receivables.)

The following table shows the current aging status of the Company’s entire loan portfolio. Only 2.8% of the entire portfolio is in a non-performing (non-accrual or greater than 90 days past due and still accruing interest) with only 1.7% either one or two payments past due. In total, 95.5% of the Company’s total loan portfolio is current according to the original contractual terms of the loan agreements.

The tables below show the aging of the Company’s loan portfolio at September 30, 2009 and June 30, 2009:

As of September 30, 2009


	Non-			90+ days and			60-89 days			30-59 days
(Dollars in thousands)	Accrual			still accruing			past due			past due			Current			Total Loans
Loan Balances:

Commercial and commercial real estate loans	$	166,726		$	23,377		$	31,957		$	80,069		$	4,733,730		$	5,035,859
Home equity loans		6,808			100			716			5,375			915,549			928,548
Residential real estate loans		4,077			1,172			476			1,595			273,831			281,151
Premium finance receivables — commercial		16,093			11,714			6,394			7,880			709,951			752,032
Premium finance receivables — life insurance		—			—			—			—			1,045,653			1,045,653
Indirect consumer loans		736			549			862			2,398			110,983			115,528
Consumer and other loans		282			25			556			304			115,319			116,486

Total loans, net of unearned income	$	194,722		$	36,937		$	40,961		$	97,621		$	7,905,016		$	8,275,257


Aging as a % of Loan Balance:

Commercial and commercial real estate loans		3.3	%		0.5	%		0.6	%		1.6	%		94.0	%		100.0	%
Home equity loans		0.7			—			0.1			0.6			98.6			100.0
Residential real estate loans		1.5			0.4			0.2			0.6			97.4			100.0
Premium finance receivables — commercial		2.1			1.6			0.9			1.0			94.4			100.0
Premium finance receivables — life insurance		—			—			—			—			100.0			100.0
Indirect consumer loans		0.6			0.5			0.7			2.1			96.1			100.0
Consumer and other loans		0.2			—			0.5			0.3			99.0			100.0

Total loans, net of unearned income		2.4	%		0.4	%		0.5	%		1.2	%		95.5	%		100.0	%

As of June 30, 2009


	Non-			90+ days and			60-89 days			30-59 days
(Dollars in thousands)	Accrual			still accruing			past due			past due			Current			Total Loans
Loan Balances:

Commercial and commercial real estate loans	$	184,722		$	7,519		$	59,673		$	34,870		$	4,797,133		$	5,083,917
Home equity loans		7,133			—			414			1,934			902,918			912,399
Residential real estate loans		4,792			1,447			161			429			272,516			279,345
Premium finance receivables — commercial		15,806			14,301			6,637			13,855			837,516			888,115
Premium finance receivables — life insurance		—			—			—			—			182,399			182,399
Indirect consumer loans		1,225			695			721			2,607			128,560			133,808
Consumer and other loans		238			341			213			821			113,880			115,493

Total loans, net of unearned income	$	213,916		$	24,303		$	67,819		$	54,516		$	7,234,922		$	7,595,476


Aging as a % of Loan Balance:

Commercial and commercial real estate loans		3.6	%		0.1	%		1.2	%		0.7	%		94.4	%		100.0	%
Home equity loans		0.8			—			—			0.2			99.0			100.0
Residential real estate loans		1.7			0.5			0.1			0.2			97.6			100.0
Premium finance receivables — commercial		1.8			1.6			0.7			1.6			94.3			100.0
Premium finance receivables — life insurance		—			—			—			—			100.0			100.0
Indirect consumer loans		0.9			0.5			0.5			1.9			96.1			100.0
Consumer and other loans		0.2			0.3			0.2			0.7			98.6			100.0

Total loans, net of unearned income		2.8	%		0.3	%		0.9	%		0.7	%		95.3	%		100.0	%

The following table shows the value of non-performing loans, impaired loans, the specific impairment reserves and the total allowance for credit losses at the end of each of the five previous fiscal quarters:


							Specific
							Impairment
			Impaired				Reserves on
	Non-		Loans		Allowance for		Impaired
	Performing		(included in		Credit Losses		Loans (incl.
(Dollars in thousands)	Loans (NPLs)		NPLs)		(“ACL”)		in ACL)
As of September 30, 2009	$	231,659	$	148,008	$	98,225	$	16,485
As of June 30, 2009	$	238,219	$	206,192	$	86,699	$	33,741
As of March 31, 2009	$	175,866	$	151,290	$	75,834	$	23,476
As of December 31, 2008	$	136,094	$	113,709	$	71,353	$	16,639
As of September 30, 2008	$	113,041	$	60,098	$	66,820	$	16,144

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of the probable and reasonably estimable loan losses that our loan portfolio is expected to incur. The allowance for loan losses is determined quarterly using a methodology that incorporates important risk characteristics of each loan, as described below under “How We Determine the Allowance for Credit Losses.” This process is subject to review at each of our bank subsidiaries by the applicable regulatory authority, including the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the State of Illinois and the State of Wisconsin.

Management ~~believes~~has determined that the allowance for loan losses was adequate at September 30, 2009, and that the loan portfolio is well diversified and well secured, without undue concentration in any specific risk area. ~~Loan quality~~This process involves a high degree of management judgment, however the allowance for credit losses is ~~continually monitored by management~~based on a comprehensive, well documented, and consistently applied analysis of the Company’s loan portfolio. This analysis takes into consideration all available information existing as of the financial statement date, including environmental factors such as economic, industry, geographical and political factors. The relative level of allowance for credit losses is reviewed and compared to industry peers. This review encompasses levels of total nonperforming loans, portfolio mix, portfolio concentrations, current geographic risks and overall levels of net charge-offs. Historical trending of both the Company’s results and the industry peers is also reviewed to analyze comparative significance.

The following table summarizes the activity in our allowance for credit losses during the periods indicated.

Allowance for Credit Losses


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2009			2008			2009			2008
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period	$	85,113		$	57,633		$	69,767		$	50,389
Provision for credit losses		91,193			24,129			129,329			42,985
Reclassification to allowance for lending-related commitments		(1,543	)		—			(1,543	)		—

Charge-offs:
Commercial and commercial real estate loans		74,613			13,543			92,348			22,930
Home equity loans		1,727			28			3,034			53
Residential real estate loans		422			786			682			1,004
Premium finance receivables — commercial		2,478			1,002			5,622			2,798
Premium finance receivables — life insurance		—			—			—			—
Indirect consumer loans		588			292			1,421			821
Consumer and other loans		244			165			495			461

Total charge-offs		80,072			15,816			103,602			28,067


Recoveries:
Commercial and commercial real estate loans		139			216			454			285
Home equity loans		1			—			3			—
Residential real estate loans		—			—			—			—
Premium finance receivables — commercial		161			118			457			518
Premium finance receivables — life insurance		—			—			—			—
Indirect consumer loans		62			29			135			135
Consumer and other loans		42			18			96			82

Total recoveries		405			381			1,145			1,020


Net charge-offs		(79,667	)		(15,435	)		(102,457	)		(27,047	)


Allowance for loan losses at period end	$	95,096		$	66,327		$	95,096		$	66,327

Allowance for unfunded loan commitments at period end	$	3,129		$	493		$	3,129		$	493


Allowance for credit losses at period end	$	98,225		$	66,820		$	98,225		$	66,820

Credit discounts on purchased loans		36,195			—			36,195			—

Total credit reserves	$	134,420		$	66,820		$	134,420		$	66,820


Annualized net charge-offs by category as a percentage of its own respective category’s average:
Commercial and commercial real estate loans		5.83	%		1.15	%		2.48	%		0.67	%
Home equity loans		0.75			0.01			0.44			0.01
Residential real estate loans		0.33			0.92			0.19			0.39
Premium finance receivables — commercial		0.74			0.29			0.54			0.26
Premium finance receivables — life insurance		—			—			—			—
Indirect consumer loans		1.67			0.49			1.19			0.41
Consumer and other loans		0.71			0.36			0.38			0.31

Total loans, net of unearned income		3.65	%		0.84	%		1.66	%		0.50	%


Net charge-offs as a percentage of the provision for loan losses		87.36	%		63.97	%		79.22	%		62.92	%


Loans at period-end							$	8,275,257		$	7,322,545
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans at period-end								1.15	%		0.91	%
Allowance for credit losses as a percentage of loans at period-end								1.19	%		0.91	%
Total credit reserves as a percentage of loans at period-end								1.62	%		0.91	%

The allowance for credit losses is comprised of an allowance for loan losses, which is determined with respect to loans that we have issued, and an allowance for lending-related commitments. Our allowance for lending-related commitments is determined with respect to funds that we have committed to lend but for which funds have not yet been disbursed and is ~~reviewed by~~computed using a methodology similar to that used to determine the ~~Banks’ Boards of Directors and their Credit Committees on a monthly basis. Independent external reviews of the~~allowance for loan ~~portfolio are provided by the examinations conducted by regulatory authorities and an independent loan review performed by an entity engaged by the Board of Directors. The amount of additions~~losses. Additions to the allowance for loan losses ~~which is~~each quarter are charged to earnings through the provision for credit ~~losses, is~~losses. Charge-offs represent the amount of loans that have been determined ~~based on management’s assessment of the adequacy of~~to be uncollectible during a given period, and are deducted from the allowance for loan ~~losses. Management evaluates on at least a quarterly basis a variety~~losses, and recoveries represent the amount of ~~factors, including actual charge-offs during the year, historical loss experience, delinquent~~collections received from loans that had previously been charged off, and ~~other potential problem loans, and economic conditions and trends in the market area in assessing the adequacy of~~are credited to the allowance for loan losses.

InHow We Determine the ~~second quarter of 2008, the Company refined its methodology~~Allowance for determining certain elements of the allowance for loan losses. These refinements resulted in an allocation of the allowance to loan portfolio groups based on loan collateral and credit risk rating and did not have a material impact on the allowance as compared to the previous methodology. Previously, this element of the allowance was not segmented at the loan collateral and credit risk rating level. The Company maintains its allowance for loan losses at a level believed adequate by management to absorb probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio and is based on the size and current risk characteristics of the loan portfolio, an assessment of internal problem loan identification system (“Problem Loan Report”) loans and actual loss experience, changes in the composition of the loan portfolio, historical loss experience, changes in lending policies and procedures, including underwriting standards and collections, charge-off, and recovery practices, changes in experience, ability and depth of lending management and staff, changes in national and local economic and business conditions and developments, including the condition of various market segments and changes in the volume and severity of past due and classified loans and trends in the volume of non-accrual loans, troubled debt restructurings and other loan modifications. Credit Losses

The allowance for loan losses ~~also~~ includes an element for estimated probable but undetected losses and for imprecision in the credit risk models used to calculate the allowance. ~~The~~As part of the Problem Loan Reporting system review, the Company ~~reviews non-performing loans~~analyzes the loan for purposes of calculating our specific impairment reserves and a general reserve.

Specific Impairment Reserves:

Loans with a credit risk rating of a 6, 7 or 8 are reviewed on a ~~case-by-case~~monthly basis to ~~allocate~~determine if (a) an amount is deemed uncollectible (a charge-off) or (b) there is an amount with respect to which it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect amounts due in accordance with the original contractual terms of the loan (a specific impairment reserve). Loans which are not assigned a specific ~~dollar amount~~reserve are included in the determination of the general reserve.

General Reserves:

For loans with a credit risk rating of 5 or better and loans with a risk rating of 6, 7 or 8 with no specific reserve, reserves ~~whereas all other loans~~ are ~~reserved for~~established based on the type of loan collateral, if any, and the assigned credit risk ~~rating reserve percentages.~~rating. Determination of the allowance is inherently subjective as it requires significant estimates, including the amounts and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired loans, estimated losses on pools of homogeneous loans based on historical loss experience, and consideration of current environmental factors and economic trends, all of which may be susceptible to significant change. The Company also maintains an allowance for lending-related commitments which relates to certain amounts that the Company is committed to lend but for which funds have not yet been disbursed and is computed using a methodology similar to that used to

We determine this component of the allowance for loan ~~losses. Loan~~ losses ~~are charged off against~~by classifying each loan into (i) one of 87 categories based on the type of collateral that secures the loan (if any), and (ii) one of nine categories based on the credit risk rating of the loan, as described above under “Past Due Loans and Non-Performing Assets.” Each combination of collateral and credit risk rating is then assigned a specific loss factor that incorporates the following factors:

	•		historical underwriting loss factor;

	•		changes in lending policies and procedures, including changes in underwriting standards and collection, charge-off, and recovery practices not considered elsewhere in estimating credit losses;

	•		changes in national, regional, and local economic and business conditions and developments that affect the collectibility of the portfolio;

	•		changes in the nature and volume of the portfolio and in the terms of the loans;

	•		changes in the experience, ability, and depth of lending management and other relevant staff;

	•		changes in the volume and severity of past due loans, the volume of non-accrual loans, and the volume and severity of adversely classified or graded loans;

	•		changes in the quality of the bank’s loan review system;

	•		changes in the underlying collateral for collateral dependent loans;

	•		the existence and effect of any concentrations of credit, and changes in the level of such concentrations; and

	•		the effect of other external factors such as competition and legal and regulatory requirements on the level of estimated credit losses in the bank’s existing portfolio.

Recent Refinements to the Methodology:

The Company’s methodology for determining the allowance ~~while recoveries are credited to the allowance. A provision~~ for ~~credit~~loan losses is charged to operations based on management’s periodic evaluation of the factors previously mentioned, as well as other pertinent factors. Evaluations are conducted at least quarterly and more frequently if deemed necessary.

The provision for credit losses totaled $23.7 million for the second quarter of 2009, $14.5 million in the first quarter of 2009 and $10.3 million for the second quarter of 2008. For the quarter ended June 30, 2009, net charge-offs totaled $12.8 million compared to $10.0 million in the first quarter of 2009 and $6.4 million recordedwas refined in the second quarter of ~~2008. On~~2008, in order to:

	•		expand and standardize the classification of collateral at each of the Company’s 15 subsidiary banks;

	•		comply with emerging regulatory guidance to modify our credit risk rating processes; and

	•		facilitate the development of a model for determining the allowance for loan losses on a loan-by-loan basis.

The refined methodology was developed in consultation with the examination teams of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the State of Illinois and the State of Wisconsin, and we believe it provides a ~~ratio basis, annualized net charge-offs as~~greater level of detail to management within the existing process. The refined methodology did not result in a ~~percentage~~materially different determination of average loans were 0.63% in the second quarter of 2009, 0.51% in the first quarter of 2009, and 0.36% in the second quarter of 2008. On a year-to-date basis, the provision for credit losses totaled $38.1 million for 2009 and $18.9 million for the same period in 2008. Net charge-offs totaled $22.8 million in 2009 compared to $11.6 million recorded in 2008. On a ratio basis, annualized net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans were 0.57% in 2009 and 0.33% in 2008.

~~Management believes~~ the allowance for loan losses, ~~is adequate to provide for inherent losses in~~but has given our management a greater level of detail by providing the ~~portfolio. There can be no assurances however, that future losses will not exceed the amounts provided for, thereby affecting future results of operations. The amount of future additions to the~~appropriate allowance for loan losses ~~will be dependent upon management’s assessment of the adequacy of the allowance based~~ on ~~its evaluation of economic conditions, changes in real estate values, interest rates, the regulatory environment, the level of past-due~~a loan-by-loan basis.

Home Equity and non-performing loans, and other factors. The increase from the end of the prior quarter reflects the continued economic weaknesses in the Company’s markets and is the result of an individual review of a significant number of individual credits as well as the overall risk factors impacting certain types of credits, specifically credits with residential development collateral valuation exposure.

~~Past Due Loans and Non-performing Assets~~

~~The following table sets forth Wintrust’s non-performing assets at the dates indicated. The information in the table should be read in conjunction with the detailed discussion following the table.~~

June 30, March 31, December 31, June 30,
(Dollars in thousands) 2009 2009 2008 2008
Loans past due greater than 90 days and still accruing:

Residential real estate and home equity⁽¹⁾
$ 1,447 $ 726 $ 617 $ 200
Commercial, consumer and other 7,860 4,958 14,750 2,259
Premium finance receivables 14,301 9,722 9,339 5,180
Indirect consumer loans 695 1,076 679 471

Total past due greater than 90 days and still accruing 24,303 16,482 25,385 8,110

Non-accrual loans:

Residential real estate and home equity⁽¹⁾
11,925 9,209 6,528 3,384
Commercial, consumer and other 184,960 136,397 91,814 61,918
Premium finance receivables 15,806 12,694 11,454 13,005
Indirect consumer loans 1,225 1,084 913 389

Total non-accrual 213,916 159,384 110,709 78,696

Total non-performing loans:

Residential real estate and home equity⁽¹⁾
13,372 9,935 7,145 3,584
Commercial, consumer and other 192,820 141,355 106,564 64,177
Premium finance receivables 30,107 22,416 20,793 18,185
Indirect consumer loans 1,920 2,160 1,592 860

Total non-performing loans $ 238,219 175,866 $ 136,094 $ 86,806

Total non-performing loans by category as a percent of its own respective category’s period-end balance:

Residential real estate and home equity⁽¹⁾
1.12 % 0.83 % 0.62 % 0.35 %
Commercial, consumer and other 3.71 2.79 2.16 1.34
Premium finance receivables 2.81 1.58 1.54 1.59
Indirect consumer loans 1.44 1.40 0.90 0.39

Total non-performing loans 3.14 % 2.24 % 1.79 % 1.21 %

Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of non-performing loans
35.73 % 42.22 % 51.26 % 66.39 %


~~(1)~~		Residential real estate and home equity loans that are non-accrual and past due greater than 90 days and still accruing do not include non-performing mortgage loans held-for-sale. These balances totaled $0 as of June 30, 2009, March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 and $0.2 million as of June 30, 2008. Mortgage loans held-for sale are carried at either fair value or at the lower of cost or market applied on an aggregate basis by loan type. Charges related to adjustments to record the loans at fair value are recognized in mortgage banking revenue.

~~Non-performing~~ Residential Real Estate ~~and Home Equity~~Loans:

The ~~non-performing~~determination of the appropriate allowance for loan losses for residential real estate and home equity loans ~~totaled $13.4 million as of June 30, 2009. The balance increased $9.8 million~~differs slightly from ~~June 30, 2008~~the process used for commercial and ~~increased $3.5 million from March 31, 2009. The June 30, 2009 non-performing balance is comprised of $6.1 million of residential~~commercial real estate ~~(22 individual credits)~~loans. The same credit risk rating system, Problem Loan Reporting system, collateral coding methodology and ~~$7.3 million~~loss factor assignment are used. The only significant difference is in how the credit risk ratings are assigned to these loans.

The home equity loan portfolio is reviewed on a loan by loan basis by analyzing current FICO scores of the borrowers, line availability, recent line usage and the aging status of the loan. Certain of these factors, or combination of these factors, may cause a portion of the credit risk ratings of home equity loans ~~(30 individual credits). On average, this is approximately 3 non-performing residential~~across all banks to be downgraded. Similar to commercial and commercial real estate loans, once a home equity loan’s credit risk rating is downgraded to a 6 or worse, the Company’s Managed Asset Division reviews and advises the subsidiary banks as to collateral valuations and as to the ultimate resolution of the credits that deteriorate to a non-accrual status to minimize losses.

Residential real estate loans that are downgraded to a credit risk rating of 6 or worse also enter the Problem Loan Reporting system and have the underlying collateral evaluated by the Managed Assets Division.

Premium Finance Receivables and Indirect Consumer Loans:

The determination of the appropriate allowance for loan losses for premium finance receivables and indirect consumer loans is based solely on the aging (collection status) of the portfolios. Due to the large number of generally smaller sized and homogenous credits in these portfolios, these loans are not individually assigned a credit risk rating. Loss factors are assigned to each delinquency category in order to calculate an allowance for credit losses. The allowance for loan losses for these categories is entirely a general reserve.

Effects of Economic Recession and Real Estate Market:

The Company’s primary markets, which are mostly in suburban Chicago, have not experienced the same levels of credit deterioration in residential mortgage and home equity loans ~~per chartered bank within~~as certain other major metropolitan markets, such as Miami, Phoenix or Southern California, however the ~~Company. The Company believes control~~Company’s markets have clearly been under stress. As of September 30, 2009, home equity loans and ~~collection~~residential mortgages comprised 11% and 4%, respectively, of the Company’s total loan portfolio. At present, approximately only 3% of all of the Company’s residential mortgage loans and approximately only 1% of all of the Company’s home equity loans are more than one payment past due. Current delinquency statistics of these two portfolios, demonstrating that although there is stress in the Chicago metropolitan and southeastern Wisconsin markets, our portfolios of residential mortgages and home equity loans ~~is very manageable. At~~are performing reasonably well as reflected in the aging of the Company’s loan portfolio table shown earlier in this ~~time, management believes reserves are adequate to absorb inherent losses that may occur upon the ultimate resolution of these credits.~~

~~Non-performing Commercial, Consumer and Other~~

~~The commercial, consumer and other non-performing loan category totaled $192.8 million as of June 30, 2009 compared to $141.4 million as of March 31, 2009 and $64.2 million as of June 30, 2008.~~section.

6074

Management is pursuing the resolution of all credits in this category. However, given the current state of the residential real estate market, resolution of certain credits could span a lengthy period of time until market conditions stabilize. At this time, management believes reserves are adequate to absorb inherent losses that may occur upon the ultimate resolution of these credits.

~~Non-performing Loan Composition~~

The $206.2 million of non-performing loans as of June 30, 2009 classified as residential real estate and home equity, commercial, consumer, and other consumer consists of $27.8 million of residential real estate construction and land development related loans, $95.2 million of commercial real estate construction and land development related loans, $33.4 million of residential real estate and home equity related loans, $31.1 million of commercial real estate related loans, $9.8 million of commercial related loans and $8.9 million of consumer related loans. 27 of these relationships exceed $2.5 million in outstanding balances, approximating $137.4 million in total outstanding balances. At this time, management believes reserves are adequate to absorb inherent losses that may occur upon the ultimate resolution of these credits.

~~Non-performing Premium Finance Receivables~~

~~The following table presents the level of non-performing premium finance receivables as of the dates indicated, and the amount of net charge-offs for the quarterly periods then ended.~~

June 30, March 31, December 31, June 30,
(Dollars in thousands) 2009 2009 2008 2008

Non-performing premium finance receivables $ 30,107 $ 22,416 $ 20,793 $ 18,185
- as a percent of premium finance receivables outstanding 2.81 % 1.58 % 1.54 % 1.59 %

Net charge-offs of premium finance receivables $ 1,637 $ 1,210 $ 1,131 $ 640
- annualized as a percent of average premium finance receivables 0.43 % 0.35 % 0.37 % 0.23 %

As noted below, fluctuations in this category may occur due to timing and nature of account collections from insurance carriers. The Company’s underwriting standards, regardless of the condition of the economy, have remained consistent. We anticipate that net charge-offs and non-performing asset levels in the near term will continue to be at levels that are within acceptable operating ranges for this category of loans. Management is comfortable with administering the collections at this level of non-performing premium finance receivables.

The ratio of non-performing premium finance receivables fluctuates throughout the year due to the nature and timing of canceled account collections from insurance carriers. Due to the nature of collateral for premium finance receivables it customarily takes 60-150 days to convert the collateral into cash collections. Accordingly, the level of non-performing premium finance receivables is not necessarily indicative of the loss inherent in the portfolio. In the event of default, Wintrust has the power to cancel the insurance policy and collect the unearned portion of the premium from the insurance carrier. In the event of cancellation, the cash returned in payment of the unearned premium by the insurer should generally be sufficient to cover the receivable balance, the interest and other charges due. Due to notification requirements and processing time by most insurance carriers, many receivables will become delinquent beyond 90 days while the insurer is processing the return of the unearned premium. Management continues to accrue interest until maturity as the unearned premium is ordinarily sufficient to pay-off the outstanding balance and contractual interest due.

At the end of the second quarter, the Company reclassified $520 million of premium finance receivables to a held-for-sale classification. This reclassification is a result of complying with accounting requirements related to assets that are held with the intent to sell. The Company estimated that $520 million of premium finance receivables held at June 30, 2009 may be sold, subject to market and other conditions. Non-performing premium finance receivables as a percent of outstanding premium finance receivables, including the reclassified balances, was 1.89%, compared to the 2.81% shown above. None of the loans in the $520 million reclassified are in non-performing status.

~~Non-performing Indirect Consumer Loans~~

Total non-performing indirect consumer loans were $1.9 million at June 30, 2009, compared to $2.2 million at March 31, 2009 and $860,000 at June 30, 2008. The ratio of these non-performing loans to total indirect consumer loans was 1.44% at June 30, 2009 compared to 1.40% at March 31, 2009 and 0.39% at June 30, 2008. As noted in the Allowance for Credit Losses table, net charge-offs as a percent of total indirect consumer loans were 1.20% for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 compared to 0.38% in the same period in 2008. Given the 40% decline in outstanding balances in the indirect consumer loan portfolio since June 30, 2008, the 1.20% charge-off ratio represents only $429,000 of total net charge-offs in the second quarter of 2009.

~~At the beginning of the third quarter of 2008, the Company ceased the origination of indirect automobile loans. This niche business served the Company well over the past 12 years in helping~~~~de novo~~banks quickly, and profitably, grow into their physical structures. Competitive pricing pressures significantly reduced the long-term potential profitably of this niche business. Given the current economic environment and the retirement of the founder of this niche business, exiting the origination of this business was deemed to be in the best interest of the Company. The Company will continue to service its existing portfolio during the duration of the credits.

Other Real Estate Owned

The table below presents a summary of other real estate owned as of ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and shows the changes in the balance from ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009 for each property type:


										Residential																																				Residential
	Residential									Real Estate									Commercial																		Residential									Real Estate									Commercial
	Real Estate									Development									Real Estate									Total									Real Estate									Development									Real Estate									Total
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount			#			R			Amount			#			R			Amount			#			R			Amount			#			R			Amount			#			R			Amount			#			R			Amount			#			R			Amount			#			R

Balance at March 31, 2009	$	8,281			7			7		$	28,422			45			13		$	4,814			8			5		$	41,517			60			25
Balance at June 30, 2009																																					$	7,873			6			6		$	28,908			51			11		$	4,657			8			5		$	41,438			65			22
Transfers at fair value		376			2			2			3,548			24			1			788			1			1			4,712			27			4			3,533			10			7			7,649			32			7			5,954			6			6			17,136			48			20
Fair value adjustments		—			—			—			28			—			—			—			—			—			28			—			—			(121	)		—			—			(7,197	)		—			—			(209	)		—			—			(7,527	)		—			—
Resolved		(784	)		(3	)		(3	)		(3,090	)		(18	)		(3	)		(945	)		(1	)		(1	)		(4,819	)		(22	)		(7	)		(3,272	)		(5	)		(4	)		(5,526	)		(6	)		(6	)		(1,610	)		(2	)		(2	)		(10,408	)		(13	)		(12	)

Balance at June 30, 2009	$	7,873			6			6		$	28,908			51			11		$	4,657			8			5		$	41,438			65			22
Balance at September 30, 2009																																					$	8,013			11			9		$	23,834			77			12		$	8,792			12			9		$	40,639			100			30


Balance at June 30, 2008																												$	9,233
Balance at September 30, 2008																																																																$	12,523

~~$ — balance~~
~~# — number of properties~~
~~R — number of relationships~~
~~Credit Quality Review Procedures~~
The Company utilizes a loan rating system to assign risk to loans and utilizes that risk rating system to assist in developing the Problem Loan Report as a means of reporting non-performing loans and potential problem loans. At each scheduled meeting of the Boards of Directors of the Banks and the Wintrust Risk Management Committee, a Problem Loan Report is presented, showing loans that are non-performing and loans that may warrant additional monitoring. Accordingly, in addition to those loans disclosed under “Past Due and Non-performing Loans,” there are certain loans in the portfolio which management has identified, through its Problem Loan Report, which exhibit a higher than normal credit risk. These Problem Loan Report credits are reviewed individually by management. However, these loans are still performing and, accordingly, are not included in non-performing loans. Management’s philosophy is to be proactive and conservative in assigning risk ratings to loans and identifying loans to be on the Problem Loan Report. The principal amount of loans on the Company’s Problem Loan Report (exclusive of those loans reported as non-performing) as of June 30, 2009, December 31, 2008, and June 30, 2008 totaled $395.3 million, $246.6 million and $168.6 million, respectively. The increase from June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2008 to June 30, 2009 is primarily a result of Problem Loan Report credits in the commercial and commercial real estate category. These loans are currently performing.
$ — balance
# — number of properties
R — number of relationships
6275

LIQUIDITY

Wintrust manages the liquidity position of its banking operations to ensure that sufficient funds are available to meet customers’ needs for loans and deposit withdrawals. The liquidity to meet these demands is provided by maturing assets, liquid assets that can be converted to cash and the ability to attract funds from external sources. Liquid assets refer to money market assets such as Federal funds sold and interest bearing deposits with banks, as well as available-for-sale debt securities which are not pledged to secure public funds.

While the Company obtains a portion of its total deposits through brokered certificates of deposit (“brokered CDs”), the Company does so primarily as an asset-liability management tool to assist in the management of interest rate risk, and the Company does not consider brokered CDs to be a vital component of its current liquidity resources. For example, as of September 30, 2009, Wintrust had over $1.3 billion of cash, overnight funds and interest-bearing deposits with other banks (primarily the Federal Reserve) on its books, but only maintained $588.8 million of brokered CDs. Historically, brokered CDs have represented a small component of the Company’s total deposits outstanding, as set forth in the table below:

(Dollars in thousands) September 30, December 31,
2009 2008 2008 2007 2006
Total Deposits $ 9,847,163 $ 7,829,527 $ 8,376,750 $ 7,471,441 $ 7,869,240
Brokered CDs $ 588,802 $ 468,491 $ 657,335 $ 481,293 $ 567,053
Brokered CDs as a percentage of Total Deposits 6.0 % 6.0 % 7.8 % 6.4 % 7.2 %

In December, 2008 the Company sold the Series B preferred stock and warrant to the federal government in connection with the Company’s participation in Treasury’s Capital Purchase Program. As of December 31, 2008, these were the only funds received by the Company from the federal government. Without the CPP funds, however, Wintrust would have been “well capitalized” as of December 31, 2008.

Recent Liquidity Actions

As discussed in Note 8 of the Financial Statements presented under Item 1 of this report, in September 2009, the Company’s indirect subsidiary, FIFC Premium Funding I, LLC, sold $600 million in aggregate principal amount of its Notes, which were issued in a securitization transaction sponsored by FIFC. FIFC Premium Funding I, LLC’s obligations under the Notes are secured by revolving loans made to buyers of property and casualty insurance policies to finance the related premiums payable by the buyers to the insurance companies for the policies.

The Company believes that it has sufficient funds and access to funds to meet its working capital and other needs.

Please refer to the Interest-Earning Assets, Deposits, Other Funding Sources and Shareholders’ Equity discussions of this report for additional information regarding the Company’s liquidity position.

INFLATION

A banking organization’s assets and liabilities are primarily monetary. Changes in the rate of inflation do not have as great an impact on the financial condition of a bank as do changes in interest rates. Moreover, interest rates do not necessarily change at the same percentage as inflation. Accordingly, changes in inflation are not expected to have a material impact on the Company. An analysis of the Company’s asset and liability structure provides the best indication of how the organization is positioned to respond to changing interest rates. See “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks” section of this report for additional information.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This document contains, and the documents into which it may be incorporated by reference may contain, forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws. Forward-looking information ~~in this document~~ can be identified through the use of words such as ~~“may,” “will,”~~ “intend,” “plan,” “project,” “expect,” “anticipate,” ~~“should,” “would,”~~ “believe,” “estimate,” “contemplate,” “possible,” “point,” “will,” “may,” “should,” “would” and ~~“point.~~“could.” Forward-looking statements and information are not historical facts, are premised on many factors and assumptions, and represent only management’s expectations, estimates and projections regarding future events. Similarly, these statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict, which may include, but are not limited to, those listed below and the Risk Factors discussed inunder Item 1A ~~on page 20~~ of the Company’s 2008 Annual Report on Form ~~10-K.~~10-K and in any of the Company’s subsequent SEC filings. The Company intends such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and is including this statement for purposes of invoking these safe harbor provisions. Such forward-looking statements may be deemed to include, among other things, statements relating to the Company’s ~~projected growth, anticipated improvements in earnings, earnings per share and other~~future financial performance, ~~measures,~~the performance of its loan portfolio, the expected amount of future credit reserves and charge-offs, delinquency trends, growth plans, regulatory developments, securities that the Company may offer from time to time, and management’s long-term performance goals, as well as statements relating to the anticipated effects on financial condition and results of ~~condition~~operations from expected developments or events, the Company’s business and growth strategies, including ~~anticipated~~future acquisitions of banks, specialty finance or wealth management businesses, internal growth and plans to form additionalde novobanks ~~and to open new~~or branch ~~offices, and to pursue additional potential development or acquisitions of banks, wealth management entities or specialty finance businesses.~~offices. Actual results could differ materially from those addressed in the forward-looking statements as a result of numerous factors, including the following:

	•		~~Competitive~~negative economic conditions that adversely affect the economy, housing prices, the job market and other factors that may affect the Company’s liquidity and the performance of its loan portfolios, particularly in the markets in which it operates;

	•		the extent of defaults and losses on the Company’s loan portfolio, which may require further increases in its allowance for credit losses;

	•		estimates of fair value of certain of the Company’s assets and liabilities, which could change in value significantly from period to period;

	•		changes in the level and volatility of interest rates, the capital markets and other market indices that may affect, among other things, the Company’s liquidity and the value of its assets and liabilities;

	•		a decrease in the Company’s regulatory capital ratios, including as a result of further declines in the value of its loan portfolios, or otherwise;

	•		effects resulting from the Company’s participation in the Capital Purchase Program, including restrictions on dividends and executive compensation practices, as well as any future restrictions that may become applicable to the Company;

	•		legislative or regulatory changes, particularly changes in regulation of financial services companies and/or the products and services offered by financial services companies;

	•		increases in the Company’s FDIC insurance premiums, or the collection of special assessments by the FDIC;

	•		competitive pressures in the financial services business which may affect the pricing of the Company’s loan and deposit products as well as its services (including wealth management services).;

	•		~~Changes in the interest rate environment, which may influence, among other things, the growth of loans and deposits, the quality of~~delinquencies or fraud with respect to the Company’s ~~loan portfolio, the pricing of loans and deposits and net interest income.~~premium finance business;

	•		~~The extent of defaults and losses on~~ the Company’s ~~loan portfolio, which may require further increases in~~ability to comply with covenants under its ~~allowance for~~securitization facility and credit ~~losses.~~facility;

	•		~~Distressed global~~ credit downgrades among commercial and ~~capital markets.~~life insurance providers that could negatively affect the value of collateral securing the Company’s premium finance loans;

	•		~~The ability~~any negative perception of the ~~Company to obtain liquidity and income from the sale of premium finance receivables in the future and the unique collection and delinquency risks associated with such loans.~~Company’s reputation or financial strength;

	•		~~Legislative or regulatory~~the loss of customers as a result of technological changes ~~particularly changes in regulation~~allowing consumers to complete their financial transactions without the use of ~~financial services companies and/or the~~a bank;

6377

	•		~~products~~the ability of the Company to attract and ~~services offered by~~retain senior management experienced in the banking and financial services ~~companies.~~industries;

	•		~~Failure~~failure to identify and complete favorable acquisitions in the future, or unexpected difficulties or ~~unanticipated~~ developments related to the integration of ~~acquired entities or assets into the Company.~~recent acquisitions, including with respect any FDIC-assisted acquisitions;

	•		~~Significant litigation involving the Company.~~

	•		~~Changes in general economic conditions in the markets in which the Company operates.~~

	•		~~The ability of the Company to receive dividends from its subsidiaries.~~

	•		~~Unexpected~~unexpected difficulties or unanticipated developments related to the Company’s strategy ofde novobank formations and ~~openings.~~~~De novo~~~~banks~~openings, which typically require over 13 months of operations before becoming profitable due to the impact of organizational and overhead expenses, the startup phase of generating deposits and the time lag typically involved in redeploying deposits into attractively priced loans and other higher yielding earning ~~assets.~~assets;

	•		~~The loss of customers as a result of technological~~ changes ~~allowing consumers to complete their~~in accounting standards, rules and interpretations (including SFAS 166 and 167) and the impact on the Corporation’s financial ~~transactions without the use of a bank.~~statements;

	•		~~The ability of~~significant litigation involving the ~~Company to attract~~Company; and ~~retain senior management experienced in the banking and financial services industries.~~

	•		~~The risk that~~ the ~~terms~~ability of the ~~U.S. Treasury Department’s Capital Purchase Program could change.~~

	•		~~The effect of continued margin pressure on the Company’s financial results.~~

	•		~~Additional deterioration in asset quality.~~

	•		~~Additional charges related~~Company to ~~asset impairments.~~

	•		~~The other risk factors set forth in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.~~receive dividends from its subsidiaries.

Therefore, there can be no assurances that future actual results will correspond to these forward-looking statements. The reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement made by or on behalf of Wintrust. Any such statement speaksForward-looking statements speak only as of the date ~~the statement was~~they are made, ~~or as of such date that may be referenced within~~and the ~~statement. The~~ Company undertakes no obligation to ~~release revisions~~update any forward-looking statement to ~~these forward-looking statements~~reflect the impact of circumstances or ~~reflect~~ events ~~or circumstances~~that arise after the date ~~of this Form 10-Q. Persons are advised, however, to consult further disclosures management makes on related subjects in its reports filed with~~ the ~~Securities and Exchange Commission and in its press releases.~~forward-looking statement was made.

6478

ITEM 3
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS

As an ongoing part of its financial strategy, the Company attempts to manage the impact of fluctuations in market interest rates on net interest income. This effort entails providing a reasonable balance between interest rate risk, credit risk, liquidity risk and maintenance of yield. Asset-liability management policies are established and monitored by management in conjunction with the boards of directors of the ~~Banks,~~banks, subject to general oversight by the Risk Management Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors. The policies establish guidelines for acceptable limits on the sensitivity of the market value of assets and liabilities to changes in interest rates.

Interest rate risk arises when the maturity or repricing periods and interest rate indices of the interest earning assets, interest bearing liabilities, and derivative financial instruments are different. It is the risk that changes in the level of market interest rates will result in disproportionate changes in the value of, and the net earnings generated from, the Company’s interest earning assets, interest bearing liabilities and derivative financial instruments. The Company continuously monitors not only the organization’s current net interest margin, but also the historical trends of these margins. In addition, management attempts to identify potential adverse changes in net interest income in future years as a result interest rate fluctuations by performing simulation analysis of various interest rate environments. If a potential adverse change in net interest margin and/or net income is identified, management would take appropriate actions with its asset-liability structure to mitigate these potentially adverse situations. Please refer to Item 2 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for further discussion of the net interest margin.

Since the Company’s primary source of interest bearing liabilities is from customer deposits, the Company’s ability to manage the types and terms of such deposits may be somewhat limited by customer preferences and local competition in the market areas in which the ~~Banks~~banks operate. The rates, terms and interest rate indices of the Company’s interest earning assets result primarily from the Company’s strategy of investing in loans and securities that permit the Company to limit its exposure to interest rate risk, together with credit risk, while at the same time achieving an acceptable interest rate spread.

The Company’s exposure to interest rate risk is reviewed on a regular basis by management and the Risk Management Committees of the boards of directors of the ~~Banks~~banks and the Company. The objective is to measure the effect on net income and to adjust balance sheet and derivative financial instruments to minimize the inherent risk while at the same time maximize net interest income.

Management measures its exposure to changes in interest rates using many different interest rate scenarios. One interest rate scenario utilized is to measure the percentage change in net interest income assuming a ramped increase and decrease of 100 and 200 basis points that occurs in equal steps over a twelve-month time horizon. Utilizing this measurement concept, the interest rate risk of the Company, expressed as a percentage change in net interest income over a one-year time horizon due to changes in interest rates, at ~~June~~September 30, 2009, December 31, 2008 and ~~June~~September 30, 2008, is as follows:


	+ 200			+ 100			- 100			- 200			+ 200			+ 100			– 100			– 200
	Basis			Basis			Basis			Basis			Basis			Basis			Basis			Basis
	Points			Points			Points			Points			Points			Points			Points			Points

Percentage change in net interest income due to a ramped 100 and 200 basis point shift in the yield curve:
June 30, 2009		3.9	%		1.9	%		(1.1	)%		(3.2	)%
September 30, 2009														1.2	%		0.4	%		(1.4	)%		(4.1	) %
December 31, 2008		2.0	%		(0.3	)%		(4.2	)%		(6.7	)%		2.0	%		(0.3	)%		(4.2	)%		(6.7	)%
June 30, 2008		5.8	%		2.9	%		(2.7	)%		(5.5	)%
September 30, 2008														6.5	%		3.2	%		(3.5	)%		(7.0	)%

One method utilized by financial institutions to manage interest rate risk is to enter into derivative financial instruments. A derivative financial instrument includes interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and floors, futures, forwards, option contracts and other financial instruments with similar characteristics. Additionally, the Company enters into commitments to fund certain mortgage loans (interest rate locks) to be sold into the secondary market and forward commitments for the future delivery of mortgage loans to third party investors. See Note 1014 of the Financial Statements presented under Item 1 of this report for further information on the Company’s derivative financial instruments.

Periodically, the Company will sell options to a bank or dealer for the right to purchase certain securities held within the ~~Banks’~~banks’ investment portfolios (covered call options). The Company uses these option transactions (rather than entering into other derivative interest rate contracts, such as interest rate floors) to increase the total return associated with the related securities. Although the revenue received from these options is recorded as non-interest income rather than interest income, the increased return attributable to the related securities from these options contributes to the Company’s overall profitability. The Company’s exposure to interest rate risk may be impacted by these transactions. To mitigate this risk, the Company may acquire fixed rate term debt or use financial derivative instruments. There were no covered call options outstanding as of ~~June~~September 30, 2009.

6680

ITEM 4
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

In the third quarter of 2009 FIFC completed the purchase of a majority of the U.S. life insurance premium finance assets of certain affiliates of American International Group. As a result, the Company has expanded its internal controls over financial reporting to include these operations. Integration of these operations, along with the related internal controls is expected to continue in the fourth quarter of 2009.

As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer carried out an evaluation under their supervision, with the participation of other members of management as they deemed appropriate, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as contemplated by Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon, and as of the date of that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective, in all material respects, in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company (and its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in the periodic reports the Company is required to file and submit to the SEC under the Exchange Act.

~~There~~Other than the changes above, there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

6781

PART II — Other Information

Item 1A: Risk ~~factors~~Factors

~~There~~An investment in our securities is subject to risks inherent to our business. The material risks and uncertainties that management believes affect Wintrust are described below. Before making an investment decision, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below together with all of the other information included or incorporated by reference in this report. Additional risks and uncertainties that management is not aware of or that management currently deems immaterial may also impair Wintrust’s business operations. This report is qualified in its entirety by these risk factors. If any of the following risks actually occur, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. If this were ~~no material changes from~~to happen, the ~~risk~~value of our securities could decline significantly, and you could lose all or part of your investment.

Difficult economic conditions have adversely affected our company and the financial services industry in general and further deterioration may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

The U.S. economy has been in recession since the third quarter of 2008, and the housing and real estate markets have been experiencing extraordinary slowdowns since 2007. Additionally, unemployment rates have continued to rise during these periods. These factors ~~set forth under Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors”~~have had a significant negative effect on us and other companies in the ~~Company’s Form 10-K~~financial services industry. As a lending institution, our business is directly affected by the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans, as well as by the value of collateral, such as real estate, that secures many of our loans. Market turmoil has led to an increase in delinquencies and has negatively impacted consumer confidence and the level of business activity. Non-performing loans increased to $231.7 million as of September 30, 2009 from $136.1 million as of December 31, 2008 and $113.0 million as of September 30, 2008. Continued weakness or further deterioration in the economy, real estate markets or unemployment rates, particularly in the markets in which we operate, will likely diminish the ability of our borrowers to repay loans that we have given them, the value of any collateral securing such loans and may cause increases in delinquencies, problem assets, charge-offs and provision for credit losses, all of which could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Since our business is concentrated in the ~~fiscal~~greater Chicago and southeast Wisconsin metropolitan areas, further declines in the economy of this region could adversely affect our business.

Except for our premium finance business and certain other niche businesses, our success depends primarily on the general economic conditions of the specific local markets in which we operate. Unlike larger national or other regional banks that are more geographically diversified, we provide banking and financial services to customers primarily in the greater Chicago and southeast Wisconsin metropolitan areas. The local economic conditions in these areas significantly impact the demand for our products and services as well as the ability of our customers to repay loans, the value of the collateral securing loans and the stability of our deposit funding sources. Specifically, most of the loans in our portfolio are secured by real estate located in the Chicago metropolitan area. Our local market area has experienced recent negative changes in overall market conditions relating to real estate valuation. As troubled assets are liquidated into the market, the additional supply is driving appraised valuations of real estate much lower. Further declines in economic conditions, including inflation, recession, unemployment, changes in securities markets or other factors with impact on these local markets could, in turn, have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Continued deterioration in the real estate markets where collateral for mortgage loans is located could adversely affect the borrower’s ability to repay the loan and the value of the collateral securing the loan, and in turn the value of our assets.

If our allowance for loan losses is not sufficient to absorb losses that may occur in our loan portfolio, our financial condition and liquidity could suffer.

We maintain an allowance for loan losses that is intended to absorb credit losses that we expect to incur in our loan portfolio. At each balance sheet date, our management determines the amount of the allowance for loan losses based on our estimate of probable and reasonably estimable losses in our loan portfolio, taking into account probable losses that have been identified relating to specific borrowing relationships, as well as probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio and credit undertakings that are not specifically identified.

Because our allowance for loan losses represents an estimate of probable losses, there is no certainty that it will be adequate over time to cover credit losses in the portfolio, particularly in the case of continued adverse changes in the economy, market conditions, or events that adversely affect specific customers. For example, since December 31, 2008, we have had to increase our allowance for loan losses from $69.8 million to $95.1 million as a result of the economic recession and financial crisis. This represents 1.15% of the total value of our loans outstanding as of September 30, 2009. This increase is primarily the result of deterioration in our commercial and commercial real estate loan portfolios, which comprised 61% of our total loan portfolio as of September 30, 2009. Estimating loan loss allowances for our newer banks is more difficult because rapidly growing andde novobank loan portfolios are, by their nature, unseasoned. Therefore, our newer bank subsidiaries may be more susceptible to changes in estimates, and to losses exceeding estimates, than banks with more seasoned loan portfolios.

Although we believe our loan loss allowance is adequate to absorb probable and reasonably estimable losses in our loan portfolio, if our estimates are inaccurate and our actual loan losses exceed the amount that is anticipated, our financial condition and liquidity could be materially adversely affected.

For more information regarding our allowance for loan losses, see “Asset Quality” under Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Unanticipated changes in prevailing interest rates could adversely affect our net interest income, which is our largest source of income.

Wintrust is exposed to interest rate risk in its core banking activities of lending and deposit taking, since changes in prevailing interest rates affect the value of our assets and liabilities. Such changes may adversely affect our net interest income, which is the difference between interest income and interest expense. Net interest income represents our largest source of net income, and was $244.6 million for the year ended December 31, ~~2008.~~2008 and $224.9 million and $181.8 million for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008, respectively. In particular, our net interest income is affected by the fact that assets and liabilities reprice at different times and by different amounts as interest rates change.

Each of our businesses may be affected differently by a given change in interest rates. For example, we expect the results of our mortgage banking business in selling loans into the secondary market would be negatively impacted during periods of rising interest rates, whereas falling interest rates could have a negative impact on the net interest spread earned as we would be unable to lower the rates on many interest bearing deposit accounts of our customers to the same extent as many of our higher yielding asset classes.

Additionally, changes in interest rates may adversely influence the growth rate of loans and deposits, the quality of our loan portfolio, loan and deposit pricing, the volume of loan originations in our mortgage banking business and the value that we can recognize on the sale of mortgage loans in the secondary market.

We seek to mitigate our interest rate risk through several strategies, which may not be successful. For example, with the relatively low interest rates that prevailed in recent years, we were able to augment the total return of our investment securities portfolio by selling call options on fixed-income securities that we own. During 2008, 2007 and 2006, we recorded fee income of approximately $29.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, and $2.0 million and $21.6 million for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008, respectively. During 2009, we have had fewer opportunities to use this mitigation methodology due to lower than acceptable security yields and related option pricing. We also mitigate our interest rate risk by entering into interest rate swap and other interest rate derivative contracts from time to time to mitigate our interest rate risk. These derivative contracts are entered into with counterparties. To the extent that the market value of any derivative contracts moves to a negative market value, we are subject to loss if the counterparty defaults. In the future, there can be no assurance that such mitigation strategies will be available or successful.

Our liquidity position may be negatively impacted if economic conditions continue to suffer.

Liquidity is a measure of whether our cash flows and liquid assets are sufficient to satisfy current and future financial obligations, such as demand for loans, deposit withdrawals and operating costs. Our liquidity position is affected by a number of factors, including the amount of cash and other liquid assets on hand, payment of interest and dividends on debt and equity instruments that we have issued, capital we inject into our bank subsidiaries, proceeds we raise through the issuance of securities, our ability to draw upon our revolving credit facility and dividends received from our banking subsidiaries. Our future liquidity position may be adversely affected by multiple factors, including:

	•		if our banking subsidiaries report net losses or their earnings are weak relative to our cash flow needs;

	•		if we deem it advisable or are required by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System to make capital injections to our banking subsidiaries;

	•		if we are unable to access our revolving credit facility due to a failure to satisfy financial and other covenants; or

	•		if we are unable to raise additional capital on terms that are satisfactory to us.

Continued weakness or worsening of the economy, real estate markets or unemployment levels may increase the likelihood that one or more of these events occurs. If our liquidity becomes limited, it may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

If we fail to meet our regulatory capital ratios, we may be forced to raise capital or sell assets.

As a banking institution, we are subject to regulations that require us to maintain certain capital ratios, such as the ratio of our Tier 1 capital to our risk-based assets. If our regulatory capital ratios decline, as a result of decreases in the value of our loan portfolio or otherwise, we will be required to improve such ratios by either raising additional capital or by disposing of assets. If we choose to dispose of assets, we cannot be certain that we will be able to do so at prices that we believe to be appropriate, and our future operating results could be negatively affected. If we choose to raise additional capital, we may accomplish this by selling additional shares of common stock, or securities convertible into or exchangeable for common stock, which could significantly dilute the ownership percentage of holders of our common stock and cause the market price of our common stock to decline. Additionally, events or circumstances in the capital markets generally may increase our capital costs and impair our ability to raise capital at any given time.

Our agreements with the Treasury restrict our ability to pay dividends and repurchase common or preferred stock, place limitations on our executive compensation practices, and may result in dilution to our common stockholders.

On December 19, 2008, we issued and sold preferred stock and a warrant to the United States Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”) as part of the Capital Purchase Program. The preferred stock has an annual dividend payment of 5.0%, which increases to 9.0% per year if we do not redeem the preferred stock at or prior to February 15, 2014. This higher dividend rate may be financially unattractive to us compared to the cost of capital under market conditions at that time. The warrant issued to Treasury entitles the holder to purchase 1,643,295 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $22.82 per share, and may be exercised, in whole or in part, over a ten-year period. If the warrant is exercised, the percentage ownership of holders of our common stock would be diluted.

Furthermore, we are subject to certain restrictions as a result of our participation in the Capital Purchase Program. In particular, prior to December 19, 2011, unless we have redeemed all of the preferred stock or the Treasury has transferred all of the preferred stock to a third party, the consent of the Treasury will be required for us to, among other things, increase our common stock dividend or repurchase our common stock or other preferred stock (with certain exceptions, including the repurchase of common stock to offset share dilution from equity-based employee compensation awards). The terms of the Capital Purchase Program also place limitations on our executive compensation practices, which may have a negative impact on our ability to retain or attract well qualified and experienced senior officers. The inability to retain or attract well qualified senior officer could materially and

adversely affect business, results of operations, financial condition, access to funding and, in turn, the trading price of our common stock. We may also become subject to additional restrictions in the future, as the Treasury has the power to unilaterally amend the terms of the purchase agreement to the extent required to comply with changes in applicable federal law.

Legislative and regulatory actions taken now or in the future regarding the financial services industry may significantly increase our costs or limit our ability to conduct our business in a profitable manner.

As a result of the ongoing financial crisis and challenging market conditions, we expect to face increased regulation and regulatory and political scrutiny of the financial services industry, including as a result of our participation in the Capital Purchase Program. While we are unable to predict the scope or impact of any potential legislation or regulatory action, it is possible that such regulations could significantly increase our regulatory compliance costs, impede the efficiency of our internal business processes, negatively impact the recoverability of certain of our recorded assets, require us to increase our regulatory capital, interfere with our executive compensation plans, or limit our ability to pursue business opportunities in an efficient manner.

Our FDIC insurance premiums may increase, which could negatively impact our results of operations.

Recent insured institution failures, as well as deterioration in banking and economic conditions, have significantly increased FDIC loss provisions, resulting in a decline of its deposit insurance fund to historical lows. The FDIC expects a higher rate of insured institution failures in the next few years compared to recent years; thus, the reserve ratio may continue to decline. In addition, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, as amended, increased the limit on FDIC coverage to $250,000 through December 31, 2013.

These developments have caused our FDIC insurance premiums to increase, and may cause additional increases. On September 30, 2009, the FDIC collected a special assessment from each insured institution, and additional assessments are possible. The FDIC has also proposed that insured institutions be required to prepay three years of insurance premiums in 2009. Any such premiums would be paid in cash, and while they would be recorded as a prepaid expense, our regulatory capital ratios and liquidity would be reduced, and our lending capacity would be diminished, which could negatively affect our future results of operations.

The financial services industry is very competitive, and if we are not able to compete effectively, we may lose market share and our business could suffer.

We face competition in attracting and retaining deposits, making loans, and providing other financial services (including wealth management services) throughout our market area. Our competitors include national, regional and other community banks, and a wide range of other financial institutions such as credit unions, government-sponsored enterprises, mutual fund companies, insurance companies, factoring companies and other non-bank financial companies. Many of these competitors have substantially greater resources and market presence than Wintrust and, as a result of their size, may be able to offer a broader range of products and services as well as better pricing for those products and services than we can. The financial services industry could become even more competitive as a result of legislative, regulatory and technological changes and continued consolidation. Also, technology has lowered barriers to entry and made it possible for non-banks to offer products and services traditionally provided by banks, such as automatic transfer and automatic payment systems, and has made it possible for banks that do not have a physical presence in our markets to compete for deposits. If we are unable to compete effectively, we will lose market share and income from deposits, loans, and other products may be reduced. This could adversely affect our profitability and have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our ability to compete successfully depends on a number of factors, including, among other things:

	•		the ability to develop, maintain and build upon long-term customer relationships based on top quality service and high ethical standards;

	•		the scope, relevance and pricing of products and services offered to meet customer needs and demands;

	•		the rate at which we introduce new products and services relative to our competitors;

	•		customer satisfaction with our level of service; and

	•		industry and general economic trends.

Failure to perform in any of these areas could significantly weaken our competitive position, which could adversely affect our growth and profitability, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our premium finance business may involve a higher risk of delinquency or collection than our other lending operations, and could expose us to losses.

We provide financing for the payment of commercial insurance premiums and life insurance premiums on a national basis through our wholly owned subsidiary, First Insurance Funding Corporation (“FIFC”). Commercial insurance premium finance loans involve a different, and possibly higher, risk of delinquency or collection than life insurance premium finance loans and the loan portfolios of our bank subsidiaries because these loans are issued primarily through relationships with a large number of unaffiliated insurance agents and because the borrowers are located nationwide. As a result, risk management and general supervisory oversight may be difficult. As of September 30, 2009, we had $752.0 million of commercial insurance premium finance loans, which represented 9% of our total loan portfolio as of such date.

FIFC may also be more susceptible to third party fraud with respect to commercial insurance premium finance loans because these loans are originated and many times funded through relationships with unaffiliated insurance agents and brokers. Acts of fraud are difficult to detect and deter, and we cannot assure investors that FIFC’s risk management procedures and controls will prevent losses from fraudulent activity. We may be exposed to the risk of loss in its premium finance business because of fraud, the possibility of insolvency of insurance carriers that are in possession of unearned insurance premiums that represent our collateral or that our collateral value is not ultimately enough to cover our outstanding balance in the event that a borrower defaults, which could result in a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, to the extent that affiliates of insurance carriers, banks, and other lending institutions add greater service and flexibility to their financing practices in the future, our competitive position and results of operations could be adversely affected. There can be no assurance that FIFC will be able to continue to compete successfully in its markets.

If we fail to comply with certain of our covenants under our securitization facility, the holders of the related notes could declare a rapid amortization event, which could require us to repay any outstanding amounts immediately, which would significantly impair our financial condition and liquidity.

In September 2009, our indirect subsidiary, FIFC Premium Funding I, LLC, sold $600 million in aggregate principal amount of its Series 2009-A Premium Finance Asset Backed Notes, Class A (the “Notes”), which were issued in a securitization transaction sponsored by FIFC. The related indenture contains certain financial and other covenants that must be met in order to continue to sell notes into the facility. In addition, if any of these covenants are breached, the holders of the Notes may, under certain circumstances, declare a rapid amortization event, which would require us to repay the any outstanding notes immediately. Such an event would significantly impair our financial condition and liquidity.

Widespread financial difficulties or credit downgrades among commercial and life insurance providers could lessen the value of the collateral securing our premium finance loans and impair the financial condition and liquidity of FIFC.

FIFC’s premium finance loans are primarily secured by the insurance policies financed by the loans. These insurance policies are written by a large number of insurance companies geographically dispersed throughout the country. To the extent that commercial or life insurance providers experience widespread difficulties or credit downgrades, the value of our collateral will be reduced. If one or more large nationwide insurers were to fail, the value of our portfolio could be significantly negatively impacted. A significant downgrade in the value of the collateral supporting our premium finance business could impair our ability to create liquidity for this business, which, in turn could negatively impact our ability to expand.

An actual or perceived reduction in our financial strength may cause others to reduce or cease doing business with us, which could result in a decrease in our net interest income.

Our customers rely upon our financial strength and stability and evaluate the risks of doing business with us. If we experience diminished financial strength or stability, actual or perceived, including due to market or regulatory developments, announced or rumored business developments or results of operations, or a decline in stock price, customers may withdraw their deposits or otherwise seek services from other banking institutions and prospective customers may select other service providers. The risk that we may be perceived as less creditworthy relative to other market participants is increased in the current market environment, where the consolidation of financial institutions, including major global financial institutions, is resulting in a smaller number of much larger counterparties and competitors. If customers reduce their deposits with us or select other service providers for all or a portion of the services that we provide them, net interest income and fee revenues will decrease accordingly, and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Consumers may decide not to use banks to complete their financial transactions, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Technology and other changes are allowing parties to complete financial transactions that historically have involved banks through alternative methods. For example, consumers can now maintain funds that would have historically been held as bank deposits in brokerage accounts or mutual funds. Consumers can also complete transactions such as paying bills and transferring funds directly without the assistance of banks. The process of eliminating banks as intermediaries could result in the loss of fee income, as well as the loss of customer deposits and the related income generated from those deposits. The loss of these revenue streams and the lower cost deposits as a source of funds could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

If we are unable to attract and retain experienced and qualified personnel, our ability to provide high quality service will be diminished and our results of operations may suffer.

We believe that our future success depends, in part, on our ability to attract and retain experienced personnel, including our senior management and other key personnel. Our business model is dependent upon our ability to provide high quality, personal service at our community banks. In addition, as a holding company that conducts its operations through our subsidiaries, we are focused on providing entrepreneurial-based compensation to the chief executives of each our business units. As a Company with start-up and growth oriented operations, we are cognizant that to attract and retain the managerial talent necessary to operate and grow our businesses we often have to compensate our executives with a view to the business we expect them to manage, rather than the size of the business they currently manage. Accordingly, the restrictions placed on executive compensation through our participation in the Capital Purchase Program, as well any future restrictions, may negatively impact our ability to retain and attract senior management. The loss of any of our senior managers or other key personnel, or our inability to identify, recruit and retain such personnel, could materially and adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

If we are unable to continue to identify favorable acquisitions or successfully integrate our acquisitions, our growth may be limited and our results of operations could suffer.

In the past several years, we have completed numerous acquisitions of banks, other financial service related companies and financial service related assets and may continue to make such acquisitions in the future. Wintrust seeks merger or acquisition partners that are culturally similar and have experienced management and possess either significant market presence or have potential for improved profitability through financial management, economies of scale or expanded services. Failure to successfully identify and complete acquisitions likely will result in Wintrust achieving slower growth. Acquiring other banks, businesses, or branches involves various risks commonly associated with acquisitions, including, among other things:

	•		potential exposure to unknown or contingent liabilities or asset quality issues of the target company;

	•		difficulty and expense of integrating the operations and personnel of the target company;

	•		potential disruption to our business, including diversion of our management’s time and attention;

	•		the possible loss of key employees and customers of the target company;

	•		difficulty in estimating the value of the target company; and

	•		potential changes in banking or tax laws or regulations that may affect the target company.

Acquisitions typically involve the payment of a premium over book and market values, and, therefore, some dilution of Wintrust’s tangible book value and net income per common share may occur in connection with any future transaction. Furthermore, failure to realize the expected revenue increases, cost savings, increases in geographic or product presence, and/or other projected benefits from an acquisition could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We may participate in FDIC-assisted acquisitions, which could present additional risks to our financial condition.

We may make opportunistic whole or partial acquisitions of troubled financial institutions in transactions facilitated by the FDIC. In addition to the risks frequently associated with acquisitions, an acquisition of a troubled financial institution may involve a greater risk that the acquired assets underperform compared to our expectations. Additionally, while the FDIC may agree to assume certain losses in transactions that it facilitates, there can be no assurances that such an arrangement will be agreed to, or that it will be sufficient to protect us.

De novo operations and branch openings often involve significant expenses and delayed returns and may negatively impact Wintrust’s profitability.

Our financial results have been and will continue to be impacted by our strategy ofde novobank formations and branch openings. While the recent financial crisis and interest rate environment has caused us to open fewerde novobanks, we expect to undertake additionalde novobank formations or branch openings when market conditions improve. Based on our experience, we believe that it generally takes over 13 months forde novobanks to first achieve operational profitability, depending on the number of banking facilities opened, the impact of organizational and overhead expenses, the start-up phase of generating deposits and the time lag typically involved in redeploying deposits into attractively priced loans and other higher yielding earning assets. However, it may take longer than expected or than the amount of time Wintrust has historically experienced for new banks and/or banking facilities to reach profitability, and there can be no guarantee that these new banks or branches will ever be profitable. To the extent we undertake additionalde novobank, branch and business formations, our level of reported net income, return on average equity and return on average assets will be impacted by start-up costs associated with such operations, and it is likely to continue to experience the effects of higher expenses relative to operating income from the new operations. These expenses may be higher than we expected or than our experience has shown, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Changes in accounting standards could materially adversely affect how we report our financial results and condition.

From time to time, the Financial Accounting Standards Board and the SEC change the financial accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of our financial statements. These changes can be hard to predict and can materially impact how we record and report our financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, we could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, resulting in the restatement of prior period financial statements.

Item 2: Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

No purchases of the Company’s common shares were made by or on behalf of the Company or any “affiliated purchaser” as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, during the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009. There is currently no authorization to repurchase shares of outstanding common stock.

The Purchase Agreement pursuant to which the Series B Preferred Stock was issued provides that no share repurchases may be made until the earlier of (a) the third anniversary of the date of issuance of the Series B Preferred Stock and (b) the date on which the Series B Preferred Stock has been redeemed in whole or the US Treasury has transferred all of the Series B Preferred Stock to third parties. The Series B Preferred Stock was issued on December 19, 2008.

Item ~~4: Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders~~

~~(a) The Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on May 28, 2009.~~

~~(b)~~

~~At the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the following matters were submitted to a vote of the shareholders:~~

~~To elect thirteen Directors to hold office until the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders:~~

Votes Withheld
Director Nominees For Authority
Peter D. Crist 20,976,104 1,005,068
Bruce K. Crowther 20,762,783 1,218,389
Joseph F. Damico 19,714,791 2,266,381
Bert A. Getz, Jr. 20,608,908 1,372,264
H. Patrick Hackett, Jr. 21,167,844 813,328
Scott K. Heitmann 21,785,815 195,357
Charles H. James III 20,946,113 1,051,251
Albin F. Moschner 20,897,524 1,083,648
Thomas J. Neis 21,533,380 447,792
Christopher J. Perry 20,554,302 1,426,870
Hollis W. Rademacher 21,589,061 392,111
Ingrid S. Stafford 21,392,817 588,355
Edward J. Wehmer 21,368,076 613,097

~~To consider a proposal to amend the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan to increase the number of shares that may be offered under the plan by 250,000:~~

Votes For Votes Against Abstentions Broker Non-Votes

17,858,024 1,905,662 22,917 2,273,611

To consider a proposal to amend the Company’s 2007 Stock Incentive Plan to (i) add an additional 325,000 shares of common stock to the number of shares that may be offered under the plan, (ii) modify the limitation on full value awards that may be offered under the plan, and (iii) require the Company to obtain shareholder approval prior to canceling any outstanding options or stock appreciation rights in exchange for cash, except in certain events:

Votes For Votes Against Abstentions Broker Non-Votes

15,963,686 3,854,586 65,462 2,176,480

~~To consider an advisory (non-binding) proposal approving the Company’s 2008 executive compensation as described in the Company’s proxy statement for the 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders:~~

Votes For Votes Against Abstentions Broker Non-Votes

18,579,124 3,096,166 307,426 77,498

~~To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as the independent registered public accounting firm for the year 2009:~~

Votes For Votes Against Abstentions Broker Non-Votes

21,696,117 225,387 61,657 77,053

~~Item 5: Other Information~~

Effective August 7, 2009, the Company entered into individual indemnification agreements with each of its non-employee directors and certain of its executive officers (collectively, the “Indemnification Agreements”). The standard form of non-employee director indemnification agreement and officer indemnification agreement were each approved by the Company’s Board of Directors. The Indemnification Agreements implement with more specificity the indemnification provisions provided by the Company’s by-laws and provide, among other things, that to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, the Company will indemnify such director or officer against any and all losses, expenses and liabilities arising out of such director’s or officer’s service as a director or officer of the Company, as the case may be. The Indemnification Agreements also contain detailed provisions concerning expense advancement and reimbursement. The Indemnification Agreements are in addition to any other rights each non-employee director or officer may be entitled to under the Company’s articles of incorporation, by-laws and applicable law. The foregoing summary of the Indemnification Agreements is qualified in its entirety by reference to the form of indemnity agreement for non-employee directors and officers, which have been attached to this Form 10-Q as Exhibits 10.2 and 10.3, respectively.


Illinois		36-3873352

(State of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)


Large ~~Accelerated Filer~~ accelerated filerþ		Accelerated ~~Filer~~ filero	~~Non-Accelerated Filer~~	Non-accelerated filero (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller ~~Reporting Company~~ reporting companyo


		Page

PART I. — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.	Financial ~~Statements.~~Statements		~~1-31~~1-37

ITEM 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of ~~Operations.~~Operations		~~32-64~~38-78

ITEM 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market ~~Risk.~~Risk		~~65-66~~79-80

ITEM 4.	Controls and ~~Procedures.~~Procedures		6781

PART II. — OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.	Legal ~~Proceedings.~~Proceedings	NA

ITEM 1A.	Risk ~~Factors.~~Factors		6882-89

ITEM 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of ~~Proceeds.~~Proceeds		6889

ITEM 3.	Defaults Upon Senior ~~Securities.~~Securities	NA

ITEM 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security ~~Holders.~~Holders			~~68-69~~	NA

ITEM 5.	Other ~~Information.~~Information			69	NA

ITEM 6.	~~Exhibits.~~Exhibits		7089

	~~Signatures.~~Signatures		7190
~~EX-10.2~~
~~EX-10.3~~
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1


	Six Months Ended June 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008

Other Comprehensive Income:
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities arising during the period, net	$	(17,861	)	$	(26,451	)
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities arising during the period, net							$	2,435		$	(1,246	)
Unrealized gains on derivative instruments arising during the period, net		4,567			909			3,399			615
Less: Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income, net		(498	)		(1,473	)		(910	)		(553	)
Less: Income tax benefit		(4,937	)		(9,440	)
Less: Income tax expense (benefit)								2,501			(75	)

Other Comprehensive (loss) income	$	(7,859	)	$	(14,629	)
Other Comprehensive income (loss)							$	4,243		$	(153	)


	June 30, 2009				September 30, 2009
	Amortized		Fair		Amortized		Fair
(Dollars in thousands)	Cost		Value		Cost		Value
Due in one year or less	$	100,723		101,037	$	102,362		102,801
Due in one to five years		264,235		265,087		325,697		336,407
Due in five to ten years		260,256		248,695		371,902		354,812
Due after ten years		140,299		132,476		143,387		141,306
Mortgage-backed		399,547		406,330		375,808		390,670
Federal Reserve/FHLB Stock and other equity		115,764		113,785
Federal Reserve and FHLB stock						71,889		71,889
Other equity securities						36,415		36,363

Total available-for-sale securities	$	1,280,824		1,267,410	$	1,427,460		1,434,248


þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


(1)		To the extent investments in trust-preferred securities are included, they are direct issues and do not include pooled trust-preferred securities.

(2)		Consisting entirely of residential mortgage-backed securities, none of which are subprime.


~~(1)~~		~~Excludes $520 million of~~Certain premium ~~finance receivables reclassified to held-for-sale in the second quarter of 2009.~~


								> 90 Days		Allowance
			% of					Past Due		For Loan
			Total			Non-		and Still		Losses
(Dollars in thousands)	Balance		Loans			accrual		Accruing		Allocation
Commercial:
Commercial and Industrial	$	1,345,111		16.3	%	$	16,689	$	605	$	21,799
Franchise		107,447		1.3			—		—		1,619
Mortgage warehouse lines of credit		73,816		0.9			—		—		985
Community Advantage — homeowner associations		60,146		0.7			—		—		145
Aircraft		41,606		0.5			—		153		164
Other		15,595		0.2			2,346		—		424

Total Commercial	$	1,643,721		19.9	%	$	19,035	$	758	$	25,136


Commercial Real Estate:
Land and development	$	1,041,641		12.6	%	$	103,573	$	10,090	$	22,102
Office		544,772		6.6			10,029		—		7,079
Industrial		466,725		5.6			8,476		355		7,012
Retail		570,589		6.9			10,698		12,161		7,846
Mixed use and other		768,411		9.3			14,915		13		10,686

Total Commercial Real Estate Loans	$	3,392,138		41.0	%	$	147,691	$	22,619	$	54,725


Total Commercial and Commercial Real Estate	$	5,035,859		60.9	%	$	166,726	$	23,377	$	79,861


Commercial Real Estate—collateral location by state:
Illinois	$	2,729,454		80.5	%
Wisconsin		375,911		11.1

Total primary markets	$	3,105,365		91.6	%

Indiana		48,300		1.4
Florida		43,164		1.3
Arizona		42,226		1.2
Other (no individual state greater than 0.6%)		153,083		4.5

Total	$	3,392,138		100.0	%


(1)		Excludes Federal Reserve and FHLB stock and the common securities issued by trusts formed by the Company in conjunction with Trust Preferred Securities offerings.


(1)		Income for Municipal and Corporate notes and other ~~debt~~ is recognized as a component of interest income on securities.


(1)		Income for trading account securities is recognized as a component of trading income in non-interest income and changes in the balance of mortgage servicing rights are recorded as a component of mortgage banking revenue in non-interest ~~income while gains~~income. Income for retained interests ~~are~~is recorded as a component of gain on sales of premium finance receivables or miscellaneous income in non-interest income.


(1)		Changes in the balance of mortgage servicing rights are recorded as a component of mortgage banking revenue in non-interest income while gains for retained interests are recorded as a component of gain on sales of premium finance receivables in non-interest income.


Estimated amortization

Actual in 6 months ended June 30, 2009	$	1,363
Estimated remaining in 2009		1,354
Estimated — 2010		2,381
Estimated — 2011		2,253
Estimated — 2012		2,251
Estimated — 2013		2,235


				Weighted		Remaining		Intrinsic					Weighted		Remaining		Intrinsic
	Common			Average		Contractual		Value⁽²⁾		Common			Average		Contractual		Value⁽²⁾
*Stock Options*	Shares			Strike Price		Term⁽¹⁾		($000)		Shares			Strike Price		Term⁽¹⁾		($000)

Outstanding at January 1, 2009		2,388,174		$	35.61						2,388,174		$	35.61
Granted		31,500			16.97						43,500			17.85
Exercised		(52,090	)		11.83						(174,863	)		11.72
Forfeited or canceled		(46,989	)		29.68						(72,879	)		34.72

Outstanding at June 30, 2009		2,320,595		$	36.01		4.1	$	1,408
Outstanding at September 30, 2009											2,183,932			37.20		4.1	$	7,491

Exercisable at September 30, 2009											1,833,581			36.44		3.8	$	7,029

Exercisable at June 30, 2009		1,920,664		$	34.39		3.8	$	1,376

Outstanding at January 1, 2008		2,505,181		$	34.76						2,505,181		$	34.76
Granted		57,450			31.83						57,450			31.83
Exercised		(73,408	)		14.81						(129,435	)		15.34
Forfeited or canceled		(16,100	)		47.29						(27,595	)		48.68

Outstanding at June 30, 2008		2,473,123		$	35.19		4.9	$	7,062
Outstanding at September 30, 2008											2,405,601			35.57		4.7	$	11,493

Exercisable at September 30, 2008											1,832,550			32.08		4.2	$	11,493

Exercisable at June 30, 2008		1,835,402		$	30.97		4.3	$	7,062


⁽¹⁾		Represents the weighted average contractual life remaining in years.

⁽²⁾		Aggregate intrinsic value represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (i.e., the difference between the Company’s average of the high and low stock price on the last trading day of the quarter and the option exercise price, multiplied by the number of shares) that would have been received by the option holders if they had exercised their options on the last day of the quarter. This amount will change based on the fair market value of the Company’s stock.


(1)		Net revenue is net interest income plus non-interest income.

(2)		See following section titled, “Supplemental Financial Measures/Ratios” for additional information on this performance measure/ratio.

(3)		The net overhead ratio is calculated by netting total non-interest expense and total non-interest income, annualizing this amount, and dividing by that period’s total average assets. A lower ratio indicates a higher degree of efficiency.

(4)		The efficiency ratio is calculated by dividing total non-interest expense by tax-equivalent net revenue (less securities gains or losses). A lower ratio indicates more efficient revenue generation.

(5)		The allowance for credit losses includes both the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for lending-related commitments.

(6)		Thesum of allowance for credit losses and credit discounts on purchased loans divided by total loans outstanding plus the credit discounts on purchased loans.


(1)		Liquidity management assets include available-for-sale securities, interest earning deposits with banks, federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements.

(2)		Interest income on tax-advantaged loans, trading account securities and securities reflects a tax-equivalent adjustment based on a marginal federal corporate tax rate of 35%. The total adjustments for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008 were ~~$570,000~~$515,000 and ~~$592,000,~~$576,000, respectively.

(3)		Other earning assets include brokerage customer receivables and trading account securities.

(4)		Loans, net of unearned income, include loans held-for-sale and non-accrual loans.

(5)		Interest rate spread is the difference between the yield earned on earning assets and the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities.

(6)		Net free funds are the difference between total average earning assets and total average interest-bearing liabilities. The estimated contribution to net interest margin from net free funds is calculated using the rate paid for total interest-bearing liabilities.

(7)		See “Supplemental Financial Measures/Ratios” for additional information on this performance measure/ratio.


(1)		Residential real estate loans include mortgage loans held-for-sale.

(2)		Premium finance receivables include loans held-for-sale

(3)		Total loans, net of unearned income, include loans held-for-sale and non-accrual loans.

(4)		Liquidity management assets include available-for-sale securities, interest earning deposits with banks, federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements.

~~(4)~~(5)		Other earning assets include brokerage customer receivables and trading account securities.


	Average Balances for the										Average Balances for the
	Six Months Ended										Nine Months Ended
	June 30, 2009					June 30, 2008					September 30, 2009					September 30, 2008
(Dollars in thousands)	Balance		Percent			Balance		Percent			Balance		Percent			Balance		Percent
Loans:
Commercial and commercial real estate	$	4,907,476		49	%	$	4,509,441		53	%	$	4,962,504		49	%	$	4,544,182		52	%
Home equity		914,834		9			709,449		8			916,095		9			739,717		9
Residential real estate⁽¹⁾		467,913		5			343,380		4			490,263		5			342,615		4
Premium finance receivables⁽²⁾		1,466,447		14			1,127,792		13			1,590,961		16			1,157,557		13
Indirect consumer loans		154,270		2			231,029		3			144,255		1			224,846		3
Other loans		154,118		2			163,098		2			140,258		1			162,550		2

Total loans, net of unearned income(3)		8,065,058		81			7,084,189		83			8,244,336		81			7,171,467		83
Liquidity management assets⁽³⁾⁽⁴⁾		1,845,283		19			1,467,768		17			1,923,869		19			1,493,511		17
Other earning assets⁽⁴⁾⁽⁵⁾		22,412		—			24,461		—			23,242		—			23,530		—

Total average earning assets	$	9,932,753		100	%	$	8,576,418		100	%	$	10,191,447		100	%	$	8,688,508		100	%

Total average assets	$	10,881,525				$	9,526,832				$	11,154,193				$	9,646,060

Total average earning assets to total average assets				91	%				90	%				91	%				90	%


	Minimum
	Capital			Adequately			Well
	Requirements			Capitalized			Capitalized
Leverage ratio		4.0	%		4.0	%		5.0	%
Tier 1capital to risk-weighted assets		4.0			4.0			6.0
Total capital to risk-weighted assets		8.0			8.0			10.0


$ — balance

# — number of properties

R — number of relationships


	Votes		Withheld
Director Nominees	For		Authority
Peter D. Crist		20,976,104		1,005,068
Bruce K. Crowther		20,762,783		1,218,389
Joseph F. Damico		19,714,791		2,266,381
Bert A. Getz, Jr.		20,608,908		1,372,264
H. Patrick Hackett, Jr.		21,167,844		813,328
Scott K. Heitmann		21,785,815		195,357
Charles H. James III		20,946,113		1,051,251
Albin F. Moschner		20,897,524		1,083,648
Thomas J. Neis		21,533,380		447,792
Christopher J. Perry		20,554,302		1,426,870
Hollis W. Rademacher		21,589,061		392,111
Ingrid S. Stafford		21,392,817		588,355
Edward J. Wehmer		21,368,076		613,097


Votes For	Votes Against		Abstentions		Broker Non-Votes

17,858,024		1,905,662		22,917		2,273,611

10.1		~~Asset Purchase~~Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of ~~July 28,~~October 30, 2009 ~~between American International Group, Inc.~~among Wintrust Financial Corporation, the lenders named therein, and ~~First Insurance Funding Corp.~~Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on ~~Form~~ 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on ~~July 28,~~November 5, 2009).

~~10.2~~		~~Form of Director Indemnification Agreement.~~

~~10.3~~		~~Form of Officer Indemnification Agreement.~~

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1		Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


	~~WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION~~ ~~(Registrant)~~
Date: ~~August 10,~~November 9, 2009	/s/ DAVID L. STOEHR
	David L. Stoehr
	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)