UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
   
þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended JulyOctober 31, 2009
OR
   
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from            to
Commission File: 001-07982
RAVEN INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
   
South Dakota
46-0246171
(State of incorporation) 46-0246171
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
205 East 6th Street, P.O. Box 5107, Sioux Falls, SD 57117-5107
(Address of principal executive offices)
(605) 336-2750
(Registrant’s telephone number including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant(1)has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and(2)has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.þ Yeso No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).þ Yeso No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated fileroAccelerated filerþ Non-accelerated filero
Smaller reporting companyo
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Smaller reporting company o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).o Yesþ No
As of August 31,November 30, 2009 there were 18,020,91518,026,055 shares of common stock, $1 par value, of Raven Industries, Inc. outstanding. There were no other classes of stock outstanding.
 
 


 

RAVEN INDUSTRIES, INC.
INDEX
     
PAGE
  
    PAGE
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
Item 1.Financial Statements:    
  3 
  4 
  5 
  6-9 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations  9-1410-15 
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks  1416 
Internal Controls and Procedures  1516 
     
    
     
Legal Proceedings  1617 
Risk Factors  1617 
Changes in Securities  1617 
Defaults upon Senior Securities  1617 
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders  1617 
Other Information  1617 
Exhibits Filed  1617 
  17 
 EX-31.1
 EX-31.2
 EX-32.1
 EX-32.2

2


PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
RAVEN INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(unaudited)
                        
 July 31, January 31, July 31,  October 31, January 31, October 31, 
(in thousands except share data) 2009 2009 2008  2009 2009 2008 
ASSETS
  
Current Assets  
Cash and cash equivalents $41,032 $16,267 $30,136  $43,262 $16,267 $31,194 
Short-term investments 2,000  2,100  3,000   
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $350, $613, and $375, respectively 29,155 40,278 34,936 
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $318, $613 and $614, respectively 35,902 40,278 44,307 
Inventories:  
Materials 21,352 26,657 33,115  21,013 26,657 28,192 
In process 3,738 3,258 3,996  3,517 3,258 3,901 
Finished goods 4,359 6,062 5,441  6,231 6,062 8,400 
              
Total inventories 29,449 35,977 42,552  30,761 35,977 40,493 
Deferred income taxes 2,508 2,542 2,347  2,570 2,542 2,510 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 3,123 3,009 3,323  2,885 3,009 2,967 
              
Total current assets 107,267 98,073 115,394  118,380 98,073 121,471 
              
  
Property, plant and equipment 88,370 86,324 83,194  87,469 86,324 84,848 
Accumulated depreciation  (53,257)  (50,444)  (47,836)  (53,628)  (50,444)  (49,309)
              
Property, plant and equipment, net 35,113 35,880 35,358  33,841 35,880 35,539 
Goodwill 7,716 7,450 7,202  7,829 7,450 7,328 
Amortizable intangible assets, net 1,376 1,471 1,580  1,254 1,471 1,533 
Other assets, net 1,534 1,541 1,844  1,316 1,541 2,044 
              
  
TOTAL ASSETS
 $153,006 $144,415 $161,378  $162,620 $144,415 $167,915 
              
  
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
  
Current Liabilities  
Accounts payable $8,485 $9,433 $12,915  $10,568 $9,433 $11,365 
Dividends payable   22,510 
Accrued liabilities 11,270 13,281 12,919  12,598 13,281 14,178 
Income taxes payable   411  460  797 
Customer advances 522 608 452  1,073 608 576 
              
Total current liabilities 20,277 23,322 26,697  24,699 23,322 49,426 
  
Other liabilities 7,898 7,537 7,916  8,088 7,537 8,142 
              
Total liabilities 28,175 30,859 34,613  32,787 30,859 57,568 
              
  
Commitments and contingencies  
  
Shareholders’ equity:  
Common stock, $1 par value, authorized shares 100,000,000; issued 32,469,598; 32,460,934; 32,436,527, respectively 32,470 32,461 32,437 
Common stock, $1 par value, authorized shares 100,000,000; issued 32,469,598; 32,460,934 and 32,456,889, respectively 32,470 32,461 32,457 
Paid in capital 5,035 4,531 4,030  5,223 4,531 4,241 
Retained earnings 141,646 131,080 145,221  146,413 131,080 128,735 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)  (958)  (1,154)  (1,561)  (911)  (1,154)  (1,724)
              
 178,193 166,918 180,127  183,195 166,918 163,709 
Less treasury stock, at cost, 14,448,683 shares 53,362 53,362 53,362  53,362 53,362 53,362 
              
Total shareholders’ equity 124,831 113,556 126,765  129,833 113,556 110,347 
              
  
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 $153,006 $144,415 $161,378  $162,620 $144,415 $167,915 
              
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial information.

3


RAVEN INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(unaudited)
                                
 Three Months Ended Six Months Ended  Three Months Ended Nine months Ended 
 July 31, July 31, July 31, July 31,  October 31, October 31, October 31, October 31, 
(in thousands except per share data) 2009 2008 2009 2008  2009 2008 2009 2008 
Net sales $56,586 $69,278 $121,808 $144,444  $60,158 $75,538 $181,966 $219,982 
Cost of goods sold 42,765 53,492 89,017 106,643  44,648 57,537 133,665 164,180 
                  
  
Gross profit 13,821 15,786 32,791 37,801  15,510 18,001 48,301 55,802 
  
Selling, general and administrative expenses 4,515 5,474 9,372 10,848  4,391 5,630 13,763 16,478 
                  
  
Operating income 9,306 10,312 23,419 26,953  11,119 12,371 34,538 39,324 
  
Interest income and other, net  (105)  (176)  (106)  (294)
Other expense (income), net 3  (177)  (103)  (471)
                  
Income before income taxes 9,411 10,488 23,525 27,247  11,116 12,548 34,641 39,795 
  
Income taxes 3,207 3,673 8,090 9,550  3,823 4,163 11,913 13,713 
                  
  
Net income $6,204 $6,815 $15,435 $17,697  $7,293 $8,385 $22,728 $26,082 
                  
  
Net income per common share:  
Basic $0.34 $0.38 $0.86 $0.98  $0.40 $0.47 $1.26 $1.44 
Diluted $0.34 $0.38 $0.86 $0.98  $0.40 $0.46 $1.26 $1.44 
  
Cash dividends paid per common share $0.14 $0.13 $0.27 $0.26  $0.14 $0.13 $0.41 $0.39 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial information.

4


RAVEN INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
                
 Three Months Ended  Nine months Ended 
 July 31, July 31,  October 31, October 31, 
(in thousands) 2009 2008  2009 2008 
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
  
Net income $15,435 $17,697  $22,728 $26,082 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:  
Depreciation and amortization 3,530 3,748  5,285 5,705 
Provision for losses on accounts receivable, net of recoveries  (169) 590 
Deferred income taxes 25 437  171 21 
Share-based compensation expense 544 544  728 737 
Change in operating assets and liabilities:  
Accounts receivable 11,407 910  4,732  (8,522)
Inventories 6,571  (6,030) 5,262  (4,026)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  (724)  (758)  (448)  (417)
Operating liabilities  (2,302) 6,220  2,226 6,417 
Other operating activities, net  (165) 123   (10)  (18)
          
Net cash provided by operating activities 34,321 22,891  40,505 26,569 
          
  
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
  
Capital expenditures  (2,304)  (3,489)  (2,660)  (5,639)
Purchase of short-term investments  (2,000)  (2,100)  (3,250)  (2,100)
Sale of short-term investments  1,500  250 3,600 
Other investing activities, net  (397)  (135)  (466)  (323)
          
Net cash used in investing activities  (4,701)  (4,224)  (6,126)  (4,462)
          
  
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
  
Dividends paid  (4,864)  (4,692)  (7,387)  (7,032)
Purchases of treasury stock   (5,180)   (5,180)
Other financing activities, net  (37) 76   (36) 93 
          
Net cash used in financing activities  (4,901)  (9,796)  (7,423)  (12,119)
          
  
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash 46  (7) 39  (66)
          
  
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
 24,765 8,864  26,995 9,922 
  
Cash and cash equivalents:
  
Beginning of period 16,267 21,272  16,267 21,272 
          
End of period $41,032 $30,136  $43,262 $31,194 
          
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial information.

5


RAVEN INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
(1) Basis of Presentation and Description of Business
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial information has been prepared by Raven Industries, Inc. (the “company”) in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Accordingly, it does not include all of the information and notes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair statement of this financial information have been included. Financial results for the interim three and six-monthnine-month periods ended JulyOctober 31, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending January 31, 2010. The January 31, 2009 consolidated balance sheet was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. This financial information should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes included in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2009.
(2) Operating Expenses
The primary types of operating expenses are classified in the income statement as follows:
   
Cost of Goods Sold Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Direct material costs Personnel costs
Material acquisition and handling costs Professional service fees
Direct labor Advertising
Factory overhead including depreciation Promotions
Inventory obsolescence Information technology equipment depreciation
Product warranties Office supplies
Research and development  
The company’s gross margins may not be comparable to industry peers due to variability in the classification of these expenses across the industries in which the company operates.
The company’s research and development expense is comprised principally of labor and material costs related to product development efforts in the Applied Technology segment. During the three and six monthnine-month periods ended JulyOctober 31, 2009, $1.4$1.5 million and $2.9$4.4 million, respectively, were expended on research and development. During the three and six monthnine-month periods ended JulyOctober 31, 2008, $1.5$1.7 million and $2.8$4.5 million, respectively, were expended on research and development.
(3) Net Income Per Share
Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average common shares and stock units outstanding. Diluted net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average common and common equivalent shares outstanding (which includes the shares issuable upon exercise of employee stock options net of shares assumed purchased with the option proceeds) and stock units outstanding. Certain outstanding options were excluded from the diluted net income per-share calculations because their effect would have been anti-dilutive, as their exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the company’s common stock during those periods. For the three and six monthnine-month periods ended JulyOctober 31, 2009, 318,600317,900 and 318,663318,408 shares were excluded, respectively. For the three and six monthsnine-month periods ended JulyOctober 31, 2008, 74,200 and 144,88374,467 shares were excluded, respectively. Details of the earnings per share computation are presented below:
                 
  Three Months Ended  Six Months Ended 
  July 31,  July 31,  July 31,  July 31, 
  2009  2008  2009  2008 
 
Numerator:                
Net income(in thousands)
 $6,204  $6,815  $15,435  $17,697 
             
                 
Denominator:                
Weighted average common shares outstanding  18,020,535   18,018,432   18,016,393   18,055,509 
Weighted average stock units outstanding  20,954   14,306   18,047   12,100 
             
Denominator for basic calculation  18,041,489   18,032,738   18,034,440   18,067,609 
             
                 
Weighted average common shares outstanding  18,020,535   18,018,432   18,016,393   18,055,509 
Weighted average stock units outstanding  20,954   14,306   18,047   12,100 
Dilutive impact of stock options  2,215   57,927   3,305   51,629 
             
Denominator for diluted calculation  18,043,704   18,090,665   18,037,745   18,119,238 
             
                 
Net income per share — basic $0.34  $0.38  $0.86  $0.98 
Net income per share — diluted $0.34  $0.38  $0.86  $0.98 

6


                 
  Three Months Ended  Nine months Ended 
  October 31,  October 31,  October 31,  October 31, 
  2009  2008  2009  2008 
 
Numerator:                
Net income(in thousands)
 $7,293  $8,385  $22,728  $26,082 
             
                 
Denominator:                
Weighted average common shares outstanding  18,020,915   18,003,044   18,017,901   18,037,823 
Weighted average stock units outstanding  21,062   14,557   19,052   12,919 
             
Denominator for basic calculation  18,041,977   18,017,601   18,036,953   18,050,742 
             
                 
Weighted average common shares outstanding  18,020,915   18,003,044   18,017,901   18,037,823 
Weighted average stock units outstanding  21,062   14,557   19,052   12,919 
Dilutive impact of stock options  1,753   55,633   3,417   53,764 
             
Denominator for diluted calculation  18,043,730   18,073,234   18,040,370   18,104,506 
             
                 
Net income per share — basic $0.40  $0.47  $1.26  $1.44 
Net income per share — diluted $0.40  $0.46  $1.26  $1.44 
(4) Segment Reporting
The company’s reportable segments are defined by their common technologies, production processes and inventories. These segments are consistent with the company’s management reporting structure and reflect the organization of the company into the three Raven divisions and the Aerostar subsidiary. Raven Canada and Raven GmbH are included in the Applied Technology Division. The company measures the performance of its segments based on their operating income exclusive of administrative and general expenses. Other income, interest expense and income taxes are not allocated to individual operating segments. Intersegment transactions are eliminated in a separate caption entitled “intersegment eliminations” to arrive at consolidated sales and operating income. SecondThird quarter and first halfnine-month intersegment sales were primarily from Electronic Systems to Applied Technology. The results for these segments follow:
                                
 Three Months Ended Six Months Ended  Three Months Ended Nine months Ended 
 July 31, July 31, July 31, July 31,  October 31, October 31, October 31, October 31, 
(in thousands) 2009 2008 2009 2008  2009 2008 2009 2008 
Net sales  
Applied Technology $18,572 $22,716 $48,006 $57,562  $20,953 $25,892 $68,959 $83,454 
Engineered Films 15,017 26,504 28,375 48,509  18,674 26,829 47,049 75,338 
Electronic Systems 17,913 14,739 34,066 28,018  15,671 17,915 49,737 45,933 
Aerostar 5,838 5,547 12,403 11,566  5,923 5,444 18,326 17,010 
Intersegment eliminations  (754)  (228)  (1,042)  (1,211)  (1,063)  (542)  (2,105)  (1,753)
                  
Consolidated net sales $56,586 $69,278 $121,808 $144,444  $60,158 $75,538 $181,966 $219,982 
                  
  
Operating income (loss)  
Applied Technology $5,117 $7,060 $14,727 $20,606  $6,856 $8,022 $21,583 $28,628 
Engineered Films 2,081 3,515 4,796 7,379  3,033 3,718 7,829 11,097 
Electronic Systems 2,962 1,239 5,457 1,879  1,567 1,804 7,024 3,683 
Aerostar 1,136 718 2,294 1,524  1,258 912 3,552 2,436 
Intersegment eliminations  (26) 26 2  (3) 11  (8) 13  (11)
                  
Total reportable segment income 11,270 12,558 27,276 31,385  12,725 14,448 40,001 45,833 
Administrative and general expenses  (1,964)  (2,246)  (3,857)  (4,432)  (1,606)  (2,077)  (5,463)  (6,509)
                  
Consolidated operating income $9,306 $10,312 $23,419 $26,953  $11,119 $12,371 $34,538 $39,324 
                  
(5) Financing Arrangements
Raven has an uncollateralized credit agreement providing a line of credit of $8.0 million with a maturity date of September 29, 2009,1, 2010, bearing interest at 1.00% under the prime rate.rate, with a minimum rate of 4% per annum. Letters of credit totaling $1.3 million have been issued under the line, primarily to support self-insured workers compensation bonding requirements. No borrowings were outstanding as of JulyOctober 31, 2009, January 31, 2009 or JulyOctober 31, 2008, and $6.7 million was available at JulyOctober 31, 2009.
(6) Dividends
The company announced on August 25,December 4, 2009, that its board of directors approved a quarterly cash dividend of 14 cents per share, payable OctoberJanuary 15, 20092010 to shareholders of record on September 25,December 24, 2009.
(7) Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income consists of two components, net income and other comprehensive income. Other comprehensive income refers to revenue, expenses, gains and losses that under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles are recorded as an element of

7


shareholders’ equity but are excluded from net income. The components of total comprehensive income and accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) follow:

7


Comprehensive income
                                
 Three Months Ended Six Months Ended  Three Months Ended Nine months Ended 
 July 31, July 31, July 31, July 31,  October 31, October 31, October 31, October 31, 
(in thousands) 2009 2008 2009 2008  2009 2008 2009 2008 
Net income $6,204 $6,815 $15,435 $17,697  $7,293 $8,385 $22,728 $26,082 
Other comprehensive income:  
Foreign currency translation 134  (17) 154  (29) 26  (199) 180  (228)
Amortization of postretirement benefit plan actuarial losses, net of income tax of $11, $20, $22 and $39, respectively 21 36 42 74 
Amortization of postretirement benefit plan actuarial losses, net of income tax of $11, $20, $33 and $60, respectively 21 36 63 110 
                  
Total other comprehensive income 155 19 196 45  47  (163) 243  (118)
                  
Total comprehensive income $6,359 $6,834 $15,631 $17,742  $7,340 $8,222 $22,971 $25,964 
                  
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
                        
 July 31, January 31, July 31,  October 31, January 31, October 31, 
(in thousands) 2009 2009 2008  2009 2009 2008 
Foreign currency translation $31 $(124) $94  $56 $(124) $(104)
Post-retirement benefits  (989)  (1,030)  (1,655)  (967)  (1,030)  (1,620)
              
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss $(958) $(1,154) $(1,561) $(911) $(1,154) $(1,724)
              
(8) Employee Retirement Benefits
The components of net periodic benefit cost for postretirement benefits are as follows:
                                
 Three Months Ended Six Months Ended  Three Months Ended Nine months Ended 
 July 31, July 31, July 31, July 31,  October 31, October 31, October 31, October 31, 
(in thousands) 2009 2008 2009 2008  2009 2008 2009 2008 
Service cost $13 $17 $27 $34  $14 $17 $41 $51 
Interest cost 83 90 166 180  83 91 249 270 
Amortization of actuarial losses 32 56 64 113  32 56 96 170 
                  
Net periodic benefit cost $128 $163 $257 $327  $129 $164 $386 $491 
                  
(9) Product Warranty Costs
Accruals necessary for product warranties are estimated based upon historical warranty costs and average time elapsed between purchases and returns for each division. Any warranty issues that are unusual in nature are accrued individually. Changes in the carrying amount of accrued product warranty costs follow:
                                
 Three Months Ended Six Months Ended  Three Months Ended Nine months Ended 
 July 31, July 31, July 31, July 31,  October 31, October 31, October 31, October 31, 
(in thousands) 2009 2008 2009 2008  2009 2008 2009 2008 
Balance, beginning of period $1,099 $793 $1,004 $684  $1,106 $1,018 $1,004 $684 
Accrual for warranties 755 852 1,240 1,311  541 688 1,781 1,999 
Settlements made (in cash or in kind)  (748) ��(627)  (1,138)  (977)  (502)  (704)  (1,640)  (1,681)
                  
Balance, end of period $1,106 $1,018 $1,106 $1,018  $1,145 $1,002 $1,145 $1,002 
                  
(10) 
(10)Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting PronouncementsStandards Board (FASB) issued the Accounting Standards Codification (Codification), which became the single source of authoritative generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States, other than rules and interpretive releases issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Codification is a reorganization of current GAAP into a topical format that eliminates the current GAAP hierarchy and instead establishes two levels of guidance — authoritative and non-authoritative. All non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature that is not included in the Codification will become non-authoritative. The company adopted the Codification in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 which resulted in no changes to the content of the company’s financial statements or disclosures.
At the beginning of fiscal 2010, the company adopted SFAS No. 161,DisclosuresFASB guidance that amends required disclosures about Derivative Instrumentsderivative instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. SFAS No. 161hedging activities. This guidance requires enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why derivative instruments are used, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect

8


an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. The adoption of SFAS No. 161this guidance had no impact on the company’s consolidated results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
At the beginning of fiscal 2010, the company adopted FSP No. FAS 142-3,Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets, whichFASB guidance that amends the list of factors an entitythat should considerbe considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used in determining the useful life of recognized intangible assets under SFAS No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The new guidance appliesapply to (1) intangible assets that are acquired individually or with a group of other assets, and (2) intangible assets acquired in both business combinations and asset acquisitions. Under FSP No. FAS 142-3, entitiesEntities estimating the useful life of a recognized intangible asset must consider their historical experience in renewing or extending similar arrangements or, in the absence of historical experience, must consider assumptions that market participants would use about renewal or extension. As this guidance applies only to assets acquired in the future, the company is not able to predict the impact, if any, on the company’s consolidated results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

8


As of July 31, 2009, the company adopted SFAS No. 165,Subsequent Events,FASB guidance which establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. In particular, this Statementguidance sets forth: (1) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements; (2) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements and (3) the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. The adoption of SFAS No. 165this guidance did not have a material impact on the company’s consolidated results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. In accordance with SFAS No. 165,this guidance, the company has evaluated subsequent events through the date and time the financial statementsfinancials were issued on September 2,December 4, 2009.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168,amended its guidance on accounting for variable interest entities. This guidance alters the approach to determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity and requires companies to more frequently assess whether they must consolidate variable interest entities. The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162. SFAS No. 168 establishes a two-level GAAP hierarchy for nongovernmental entities: authoritative guidance and non-authoritative guidance. The FASB will no longer issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions, and EITF Abstracts; instead, the Board will issue new guidance as Accounting Standards Updates, which will include revisions to the codification, as well as background information and the Board’s basis for conclusions for new guidance. SFAS No. 168 is effective for interim andthe first annual reporting period beginning after November 15, 2009 and for interim periods ending after September 15, 2009.within that first annual reporting period. The company will adopt this guidance on February 1, 2010 and is currently assessing the potential impacts, if any, on its financial statements and disclosures.
In October 2009, the FASB issued guidance on the accounting for multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. This guidance establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable; eliminates the residual method of allocation and requires arrangement consideration be allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method; and requires a vendor to determine its best estimate of selling price in a manner consistent with that used to determine the selling price of the deliverable on a stand alone basis. This guidance also expands the required disclosures related to a vendor’s multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. The guidance is effective beginning February 1, 2011 with early adoption permitted. The company has adopted the new guidance prospectively from the beginning of SFAS No. 168 will not have anthe fiscal year and determined that there is no material impact on the company’sits consolidated results of operations, financial condition, cash flows, or cash flows.disclosures.

9


ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This commentary should be read in conjunction with the company’s consolidated financial statements for the three and six monthsnine-months ended JulyOctober 31, 2009 and JulyOctober 31, 2008, as well as the company’s consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto and management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations in the company’s Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2009.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Raven Industries, Inc. is an industrial manufacturer providing a variety of products to customers within the industrial, agricultural, construction and military/aerospace markets, primarily in North America. The company operates in four business segments: Applied Technology (formerly Flow Controls), Engineered Films, Electronic Systems and Aerostar.
Seasonality
The Applied Technology segment is predominately focused on the agricultural market and quarterly financial results have typically been impacted by the inherent seasonality of this market. Historically, Applied Technology’s first quarter results are the strongest and the second quarter the weakest.
Snapshot
Consolidated financial highlights for the secondthird quarter and first sixnine months of fiscal 2010 include the following:
                                                
 Three Months Ended Six Months Ended Three Months Ended Nine months Ended
 July 31, July 31, % July 31, July 31, % October 31, October 31, % October 31, October 31, %
(dollars in thousands except per share data) 2009 2008 Change 2009 2008 Change 2009 2008 Change 2009 2008 Change
  
    
Net sales $56,586 $69,278  (18)% $121,808 $144,444  (16)% $60,158 $75,538  (20)% $181,966 $219,982  (17)%
Gross profit 13,821 15,786  (12)% 32,791 37,801  (13)% 15,510 18,001  (14)% 48,301 55,802  (13)%
Gross margins  24.4%  22.8%  26.9%  26.2%   25.8%  23.8%  26.5%  25.4% 
Operating income 9,306 10,312  (10)% 23,419 26,953  (13)% 11,119 12,371  (10)% 34,538 39,324  (12)%
Net income 6,204 6,815  (9)% 15,435 17,697  (13)% 7,293 8,385  (13)% 22,728 26,082  (13)%
Diluted earnings per share 0.34 0.38  (11)% 0.86 0.98  (12)% 0.40 0.46  (13)% 1.26 1.44  (13)%
  
Operating cash flow 34,321 22,891  50% 40,505 26,569  52%
Cash dividends 4,864 4,692  4% 7,387 7,032  5%
Common stock repurchases  5,180   5,180 

9


The quarter-over-quarter and year-over-year declinesslump in financial results were driven by softening global agricultural fundamentals and recessionary global economic conditions. The drop in net sales foractivity over the second quarter and firstlast half of fiscal 2009 continued through the first nine months of 2010, isnegatively impacting the resultcompany’s financial results. Third quarter consolidated results looked very similar to the first six months of year-over-yearthe year in terms of business activity and comparisons to prior year results. For the quarter, sales declinesand profits were down from the previous year’s third quarter, but improved profit margins reflect productivity gains and reduced spending levels. Gross margins of 25.8% increased two full percentage points from 23.8%, reflecting improvements in Applied Technologyall of the operating segments for the quarter. Year-to-date sales and Engineered Films partially offset by sales growth in Electronic Systems and Aerostar. In addition, the company reported lower quarter-over-quarter and year-over-year operating income, net income, and diluted earnings per share. The drop in second quarter and first half operating income is attributable to falling profits in Applied Technology and Engineered Films, partially offset by profit growth in Electronic Systems and Aerostar.
Aerostar partially offset sharp declines in Engineered Films and Applied Technology sales and profits. Despite the overall lower sales and earnings levels, year-to-date net income as a percentage of sales improved to 12.5% from 11.9% for last year’s nine-month period.
Applied Technology
Fiscal 2010 third quarter net sales of $18.6$21.0 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 were down $4.1decreased $4.9 million (18%(19%) and operating income of $5.1$6.9 million fell $1.9$1.2 million (28%(15%) compared to the secondthird quarter of fiscal 2009. For the first half ended July 31, 2009, Applied TechnologyYear-to-date net sales of $48.0$69.0 million dropped $9.6$14.5 million (17%) and operating income of $14.7$21.6 million decreased $5.9$7.0 million (29%(25%) as compared to last year’s comparable period. Economic uncertainty has dampened grower sentiment resulting in lower sales volume and profits. Growers anticipate lower farm income as commodity price declines have outpaced the first half ended July 31, 2008. Applied Technology’s results were negatively impacted by a less robust agricultural market as farm incomes have declined from prior year record levels due to falling commodity prices and uncertainty stemming from turbulent financial markets. Furthermore, quarter-over-quarter comparisons were unfavorable as the prior year’s second quarter included carryover demand as ordersdrop in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 exceeded production capacity.input costs.
Engineered Films
Fiscal 2010 third quarter net sales of $15.0$18.7 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 fell $11.5$8.2 million (43%(30%) and operating income of $2.1$3.0 million declined $1.4 million (41%$685,000 (18%) as compared toversus the secondthird quarter of fiscal 2009. In the first half of fiscal 2010, Engineered FilmsYear-to-date net sales of $28.4$47.0 million dropped $20.1$28.3 million (42%(38%) and operating income of $4.8$7.8 million decreased $2.6$3.3 million (35%(29%) as compared to fiscal 2009’s comparable period. The decline in sales and profitability was driven primarily by lower shipments of pit liners used in the first half of fiscal 2009. Engineered Films second quarterenergy exploration market. Oil and first half results were negatively impacted bygas drilling activity has decreased, reflecting lower oil prices and economic uncertainty. Additionally, the continuation of a weak construction market resulting

10


resulted in reduced demand for construction films and depressed selling prices. Additionally, demand for pit liners declined, reflecting less oil and gas drilling activity caused by falling oil prices. Sequentially, gross margins fell from 25.8% in the first quarter of fiscal 2010improved to 18.2%19.9% in the current quarter reflecting approximatelyfrom 18.2% in the second quarter as a result of increased sales volume. First quarter fiscal 2010 gross margins of 25.8% included $1.3 million of first quarter profit from one-time opportune purchases of prime grade plastic resin.
Electronic Systems
Fiscal 2010 third quarter net sales of $17.9$15.7 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 grew $3.2decreased $2.2 million (22%(13%) and operating income of $3.0$1.6 million rose $1.7 million (139%fell $237,000 (13%) as compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2009. Electronic Systemslast year’s third quarter. Quarterly results were negatively impacted by raw material supply issues, which resulted in additional costs and time delays. Year-over-year net sales of $34.1$49.7 million in the first half of fiscal 2010 improved $6.0grew $3.8 million (22%(8%) and operating income of $5.5$7.0 million in the first half of fiscal 2010 increased $3.6$3.3 million (190%(91%) as compared to the first half of fiscal 2009. Electronic Systems second quarter and first half. Year-to-date results were positively impacted by strongersolid shipments of printed circuit boards for the aviation industry and secure communication devices.devices, along with production efficiencies.
Aerostar’s fiscalAerostar
Fiscal 2010 secondthird quarter net sales of $5.8$5.9 million grew $291,000 (5%$479,000 (9%) and operating income of $1.1$1.3 million expanded $418,000 (58%$346,000 (38%) as compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2009. Aerostar’s fiscal 2010 first halflast year’s third quarter. Year-over-year net sales of $12.4$18.3 million rose $837,000 (7%were up $1.3 million (8%) and operating income of $2.3$3.6 million improved $770,000 (51%$1.1 million (46%) as compared to the first half of fiscal 2009. Aerostar’s second quarter and first half. The positive results were positively impacted byreflect increased shipments under theof MC-6 Army parachute contract which wasparachutes partially offset by a decline in protective wear shipments.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — SEGMENT ANALYSIS
Applied Technology
Applied Technology provides electronic and Global Positioning System (GPS) products designed to reduce operating costs and improve yields for the agriculture market.
                                  
 Three Months Ended Six Months Ended Three Months Ended  Nine months Ended  
 July 31, July 31, $ % July 31, July 31, $ % October 31, October 31, $ % October 31, October 31, $ %
(dollars in thousands) 2009 2008 Change Change 2009 2008 Change Change 2009 2008 Change Change 2009 2008 Change Change
     
Net sales $18,572 $22,716 $(4,144)  (18)% $48,006 $57,562 $(9,556)  (17)% $20,953 $25,892 $(4,939)  (19)% $68,959 $83,454 $(14,495)  (17)%
Gross profit 6,544 8,884  (2,340)  (26)% 17,888 24,063  (6,175)  (26)% 8,424 10,227  (1,803)  (18)% 26,312 34,290  (7,978)  (23)%
Gross margins  35.2%  39.1%  37.3%  41.8%   40.2%  39.5%  38.2%  41.1% 
Operating income 5,117 7,060  (1,943)  (28)% 14,727 20,606  (5,879)  (29)% 6,856 8,022  (1,166)  (15)% 21,583 28,628  (7,045)  (25)%
Several factors contributed to the quarter-over-quarter and year-over-year declines in net sales and operating income:
  NetThe government’s 2009 farm income hasprojections are nearly 40% lower than 2008 actual levels. Farm production costs have declined significantly from 2008 levels due to aprior year levels; however, have been outpaced by the decline in crop prices partially offset by a reduction inprices. Expectations of lower farm production costs. Farm income remains high by historical standards; however,and economic uncertainty have led grower and custom spray applicator purchasing decisions were deferred as a result of uncertainty regarding global economic conditions causing a decline in sales acrossapplicators to defer purchases. These factors have negatively impacted substantially all of the segment’s product categories.
 
  The decline in sales for the three and six monthnine-month periods was comprised of a drop in volume partially offset by a modest increase in selling prices.

10


  First half internationalInternational sales of $9.9$13.3 million fell $1.7$1.6 million (15%(11%) year-over-year. Net sales outside the U.S. comprised approximately 21%accounted for 19% of segment sales in fiscal 2010 up slightly from 20%versus 18% in fiscal 2009. Sharp declines experiencedDeclines in some geographic markets were partially offset by expansion into regions not previously served.
 
  New product sales declined year-over-year because last year’s first six months included a high leveldue to the highly successful launch of Cruizer™ shipments. Thisat the beginning of fiscal 2009. Cruizer™ is a simple and affordable guidance system which was introducedtargeted at the beginning of last year, targeted new entrants to the precision agricultural market and was well received in the marketplace.market.
 
  First half fiscal 2010 grossGross margins of 37.3%41.1% for last year’s nine-month period contracted from 41.8% for the first half of fiscal 2009to 38.2%, as result of negative operating leverage stemming from decreased sales volume that wasyielded negative operating leverage partially offset by spending cuts and modest selling price increases.
 
  As a percentage of sales, first halfYear-to-date selling expense increased slightly to 6.9% of sales versus 5.9%6.8% in the prior six-month period due to higher expense on lower sales volume. Selling expenseyear. Nine-month selling expenses of $3.3$4.7 million decreased 3%16% year-over-year however, lagged the 17% drop in sales.reflecting a more positive collection environment and lower discretionary spending.
Engineered Films
Engineered Films produces rugged reinforced plastic sheeting for industrial, construction, geomembrane and agricultural applications.
                                  
 Three Months Ended Six Months Ended Three Months Ended  Nine months Ended  
 July 31, July 31, $ % July 31, July 31, $ % October 31, October 31, $ % October 31, October 31, $ %
(dollars in thousands) 2009 2008 Change Change 2009 2008 Change Change 2009 2008 Change Change 2009 2008 Change Change
     
Net sales $15,017 $26,504 $(11,487)  (43)% $28,375 $48,509 $(20,134)  (42)% $18,674 $26,829 $(8,155)  (30)% $47,049 $75,338 $(28,289)  (38)%
Gross profit 2,738 4,458  (1,720)  (39)% 6,186 9,356  (3,170)  (34)% 3,708 4,554  (846)  (19)% 9,894 13,910  (4,016)  (29)%
Gross margins  18.2%  16.8%  21.8%  19.3%   19.9%  17.0%  21.0%  18.5% 
Operating income 2,081 3,515  (1,434)  (41)% 4,796 7,379  (2,583)  (35)% 3,033 3,718  (685)  (18)% 7,829 11,097  (3,268)  (29)%

11


The following factors contributed to the quarter-over-quarter and year-over-year change:
  This segment has been negatively impacted by weakThe slump in global economic activity that began in the second half of fiscal 2009 and has continued through the first half ofto negatively impact financial results throughout fiscal 2010.
 
  Approximately 25%Falling prices accounted for 35% of the year-over-year decline in sales is attributable to a reduction insales. Lower selling prices. Selling prices have been driven downward by the market in response toreflect competitive pricing pressures stemming from excess capacity and lower resin costs and competitors slashing prices in orderdue to reduce inventories and fill excess capacity.relatively low natural gas prices.
 
  Roughly 75%Weak sales volume accounted for 65% of the year-over-year declinedrop in sales is due to a decline in sales volume which was down approximately 32%. Construction orders fell as the market participants adapted to a weakening economic outlooksales. Oil and the scarcity of credit. Also, deliveries of pit liners to the energy exploration market declined from prior year levels. Drillinggas drilling activity slowed due to lower oil prices and reductionsuncertainty in forecasted demand.demand resulting in a sharp decline in sales of pit liners to the energy exploration market. Additionally, construction orders fell as market participants adapted to an unclear economic outlook and the scarcity of credit.
 
  The expansion of gross margins in the current quarter and year-over-year reflectreflects reduced spending levels and a reduction in plastic resin costs that outpaced the decline in selling prices.levels.
 
  First halfYear-to-date selling expense as a percentageincreased to 4.4% of sales increased to 4.9% versus 3.9%3.7% in the prior year. Selling expense of $1.4$2.1 million decreased 26%27% year-over-year through reductions in personnel and promotional expenses, however, sales dropped 42%38%.
Electronic Systems
Electronic Systems is a total-solutions provider of electronics manufacturing services, primarily to North American original equipment manufacturers.
                                  
 Three Months Ended Six Months Ended Three Months Ended  Nine months Ended 
 July 31, July 31, $ % July 31, July 31, $ % October 31, October 31, $ % October 31, October 31, $ %
(dollars in thousands) 2009 2008 Change Change 2009 2008 Change Change 2009 2008 Change Change 2009 2008 Change Change
     
Net sales $17,913 $14,739 $3,174  22% $34,066 $28,018 $6,048  22% $15,671 $17,915 $(2,244)  (13)% $49,737 $45,933 $3,804  8%
Gross profit 3,239 1,475 1,764  120% 6,037 2,425 3,612  149% 1,871 2,092  (221)  (11)% 7,908 4,517 3,391  75%
Gross margins  18.1%  10.0%  17.7%  8.7%   11.9%  11.7%  15.9%  9.8% 
Operating income 2,962 1,239 1,723  139% 5,457 1,879 3,578  190% 1,567 1,804  (237)  (13)% 7,024 3,683 3,341  91%
The relative quarter-over-quarter and year-over-year change is primarily the result of the following:
  The 8% increase in netyear-over-year sales is attributable to increased shipment volumeshipments of aviation electronics and secure communication equipment in response to increased customermeet demand.
 
  ShipmentsThe quarter-over-quarter drop in sales and profits reflects lower volume of hand-held bed controls have begunaviation electronics shipments. Third quarter scheduled deliveries were delayed due to stabilize from the depressed levels of one year ago.

11


Gross margins expanded from 8.7%supply issues which negatively impacted throughput and resulted in the first half of fiscal 2009 to 17.7% for the first half of fiscal 2010. The improvementadditional costs. Operating income was attributable to more favorable product mix, cost controls suchreduced by approximately $500,000 as staff reduction and facility consolidation, and positive operating leverage generated through increased sales.a result.
 
  First halfYear-to-date gross margins expanded to 15.9% versus 9.8% in last year’s comparable period. Positive operating leverage generated through increased sales volume has had a positive effect on results combined with favorable product mix and cost controls, such as staff reduction and facility consolidation.
Year-to-date selling expense as a percentage of 1.8% of net sales decreased to 1.7% versus 1.9% inwas unchanged from the prior year. Selling expense of $580,000$884,000 increased slightly from one year ago due mainly to higher personnel costs, however, laggedin line with the 22% growth in net sales.
Aerostar
Aerostar manufactures military parachutes, protective wear, custom shaped inflatable products, and high-altitude aerostats for government and commercial research.
                                  
 Three Months Ended Six Months Ended Three Months Ended  Nine months Ended 
 July 31, July 31, $ % July 31, July 31, $ % October 31, October 31, $ % October 31, October 31, $ %
(dollars in thousands) 2009 2008 Change Change 2009 2008 Change Change 2009 2008 Change Change 2009 2008 Change Change
     
Net sales $5,838 $5,547 $291  5% $12,403 $11,566 $837  7% $5,923 $5,444 $479  9% $18,326 $17,010 $1,316  8%
Gross profit 1,326 943 383  41% 2,678 1,960 718  37% 1,496 1,136 360  32% 4,174 3,096 1,078  35%
Gross margins  22.7%  17.0%  21.6%  16.9%   25.3%  20.9%  22.8%  18.2% 
Operating income 1,136 718 418  58% 2,294 1,524 770  51% 1,258 912 346  38% 3,552 2,436 1,116  46%
The quarter-over-quarter and year-over-year change is primarily due to the following:
Parachute shipments increased quarter-over-quarter as a result of delays experienced in the prior year. There were virtually no parachute shipments made during last year’s third quarter due to contract modifications.

12


  Increased sales volume of MC-6 Army parachutes was partially offset by reduced protective wear shipments. Protective wear sales have declined from last year at this time due to the completion of a relatively large contract in January 2009.
Gross margins improved The improvement in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010 reflectinggross margins is a reflection of parachute manufacturing efficiencies.
 
  For the first six months,Year-to-date selling expense as a percentageof 3.4% of sales decreased to 3.1%fell from 3.8%3.9% in the prior year due to relatively flatlower selling expense andon increased sales.sales volume.
Corporate Expenses (administrative expenses, interest income and other, net and income taxes)
                                
 Three Months EndedSix Months Ended Three Months Ended Nine months Ended
 July 31, July 31, July 31, July 31, October 31, October 31, October 31, October 31,
(dollars in thousands) 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008
Administrative expenses $1,964 $2,246 $3,857 $4,432  $1,606 $2,077 $5,463 $6,509 
Administrative expenses as a % of sales  3.5%  3.2%  3.2%  3.1%  2.7%  2.7%  3.0%  3.0%
Interest income and other, net $105 $176 $106 $294 
Other expense (income), net 3  (177)  (103)  (471)
Effective tax rate  34.1%  35.0%  34.4%  35.0%  34.4%  33.2%  34.4%  34.5%
Administrative expenses decreased 13% for the three16% year-over-year and six month periods ended July 31, 200923% quarter-over-quarter due primarily to lower compensation expense.
Interest income and other,Other expense (income), net” consists mainly of interest income, bank fees and foreign currency transaction gain or loss. Interest income declined year-over-year due to lower interest rates.
The decrease in thelower effective tax rate isin the quarter ended October 31, 2008 was attributable to reinstatement of the U.S. research and development tax credit in October 2008.
OUTLOOK
Financial results forManagement responded promptly and decisively to control costs in response to the first half of fiscal 2010 have been impacted bysevere recession that began to impact the recessionary global economic environment. The weak business activity experiencedcompany in the fourth quarterfall of fiscal 2009 has continued throughout the first half of fiscal 2010. It is likely that current2008. Weak economic conditions willare likely to persist for the remainder of fiscal 2010. As with the first half of the year, thirdforeseeable future. Fourth quarter results are expected to be downmay improve marginally from the weak results recorded one year ago and on a sequential quarter basis, be similar or slightly lower when comparing year-over-year on a percentage basis. Management expectsearlier; however, full-year sales and earnings toresults will fall short of last year’s record levels.
Management reacted promptly and decisively in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 to control costs in response to deteriorating economic conditions. In addition, the company’sA strong product offerings andcash position, solid balance sheet, commitment to quality and service, have resulted in preservation of market sharerecent strategic investments and mitigatednew product offerings collectively position the impact ofcompany for future growth despite the harshchallenging economic conditions.environment.
Applied Technology
Third quarter sales are expected to miss last year’s record results. Management continues to see increased acceptanceThe recognition of precision agricultural equipment as an essentiala pivotal tool for maximizing yields in an environment of volatileand reducing input costs.costs continues to widen. However, the short-term

12


outlook is less clear. Growergrower and custom spray applicator purchasing decisions arehave been impacted by uncertainty regardinglower anticipated net farm income and uncertain global economic conditions. This is expectedFourth quarter net sales are likely to continue to negatively impact sales through the third quarter. Fourth quarter revenues could be greater than the previous year becausefall short of last year’s fourth quarter was impacted byresults.
In April 2009, the recession. This segment entered intocompany announced an agreement with John Deere to distribute select Raven products through John Deere dealers starting indealers. The financial impact of the third quarter. The benefit from this agreement is not expected to be material this year.
In July 2009, the company and SST Software, Inc. (“SST”) announced a strategic alliance to fiscal 2011 results but its impactprovide customers with simple, more efficient ways to move and manage information in the precision agriculture market. These solutions include integration of SST’s AgX™ platform into Raven’s Viper Pro and Envizio Pro field computers. SST’s AgX™ platform is a standardized data structure and reference database that enables efficient in-field record keeping and seamless communication between AgX™ compliant software and devices. SST Software is a privately held agricultural software development and information services provider with over 15 years of experience.
In November 2009, the company and SST announced that the companies would build on their strategic alliance, with Raven buying a minority ownership position in SST.
In November 2009, the current year cannotcompany purchased substantially all of the assets of Ranchview, Inc. a privately-held Canadian corporation. Ranchview, a start-up company, develops products that use cellular networks instead of the traditional radio systems that are typically used to deliver RTK (Real Time Kinematic) corrections to GPS enabled equipment. RTK corrections improve the accuracy of GPS equipment. The network can also be determined.used to provide high speed Internet access.
Engineered Films
The catalyst for long-term growth prospects for Engineered Films are expected to be driven by increased penetrationis the development of existing markets and the introduction of innovative products. Ultimately, Engineered Films is dependent on the reversal of the severe economic contraction, particularly in the oil and gas drilling and construction markets, to achieve growth.
non-commodity specialized films. In the near-term, management expects a difficult thirdyear-over-year profit comparisons are favorable for the fourth quarter as currentthe financial and economic conditions create unfavorable year-over-year comparisons. Sequentially, gross margins are expected to declineturmoil in the third quarter due to higher resin costs. Theprior year negatively impacted profitability. However, the construction market continues to be hampered by bleak industry conditions and the scarcity of credit. In

13


addition, deliveries of pit liners to the energy exploration market are expectedremain depressed relative to decline from prior yearlast year’s record levels. Drilling activity has slowed due to lower oil prices and reductions in forecasted demand. Recent increases in oil prices are encouraging but it is unlikely that drilling activity will return to prior year levels. Because gross profit rateslevels as there is widespread uncertainty as to the sustainability of current prices. Management expects a profitable fourth quarter in contrast to the operating loss reported for the final three months of fiscal 2009. Margins have improved management does not expectas a result of the previous year’s fourth quarter loss to be repeated.segment’s reduced cost structure.
Electronic Systems
Electronic Systems thirdfourth quarter sales and profits are expectedanticipated to decline from last year’s thirdfourth quarter however, profits are forecasted to increase year-over-year as cost cutting and plant consolidation measures are expected to continue to result in efficiency gains and improved margins. Sequentially, margins are expected to be lower due to product mix, although will remain strong as compared year-over-year. With avionics sales accounting for more than 50 percent of this segment’s sales, an anticipated inventory reduction by the segment’s largest customer could furtheris expected to reduce its inventory levels by year-end. Sequentially, management is cautious due to the impact of the recession on avionics sales and an expected decrease in the fourth quarter.secure communication product deliveries.
Aerostar
Although Aerostar’s long-term potentialLong-term results will be driven by successAerostar’s ability to succeed in the high-altitude research balloon and tethered aerostats markets, third quarter sales and profits are expected to be up as compared with one year earlier due to higheraerostat markets. The MC-6 Army parachute deliveries. Salescontract will wind down in the fourth quarter. Also, the previous year’s fourth quarter included $3 million of parachute sales that were delayed from the third quarter. As a result,Consequently, fourth quarter year-over-year comparisons are expected to be unfavorable.unfavorable, however, this may be partially offset by increased sales of tethered aerostats.
In October 2009, Aerostar announced that it had been awarded a five-year, IDIQ (indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity) contract for the production of US Army T-11 personnel parachutes. The first $12.2 million order of parachutes is expected to ship next fiscal year, with additional orders anticipated in the following four fiscal years.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The company’s liquidity and capital resources are strong despite the global economic recession. Management focuses on the current cash balance and operating cash flows in considering liquidity as operating cash flows have historically been the company’s primary source of liquidity. Management expects that current cash combined with the generation of positive operating cash flows will be sufficient to fund the company’s operating, investing and financing activities.
The company’s cash needs are seasonal, with working capital demands strongest in the first quarter. Consequently, the discussion of trends in operating cash flows focuses on the primary drivers of year-over-year variability in working capital.
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments totaled $43.0$46.3 million at JulyOctober 31, 2009, a $26.8$30.0 million increase compared to cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments at January 31, 2009 of $16.3 million. The comparable balances one year earlier totaled $32.2$31.2 million. In November 2008, the company paid a special cash dividend of $22.5 million.
Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities was $34.3$40.5 million in the first halfthree quarters of fiscal 2010 compared to $22.9$26.6 million in the first halfthree quarters of fiscal 2009. The company’s operating cash flows result primarily from cash received from customers offset by cash payments for inventories, services and employee compensation. The increase in first half operating cash flows is the result of variability in working capital. For the six-monthnine-month period, inventoryreduction in inventories and accounts receivable have combined to generate $18.0$10.0 million in cash as compared with cash consumed of $5.1$12.5 million during last year’s first six months.nine-months. Inventory balances have declined significantly due to improved management, lower sales and a drop in plastic resin costs. Additionally, accounts receivable have declined which reflects the decrease in business activity. This was partially offset by year-over-year reductions in accounts payable.

13


Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities totaled $4.7$6.1 million in the first halfnine-months of fiscal 2010, compared to $4.2$4.5 million in the first halfnine-months of fiscal 2009. The variance reflects a $1.4$4.5 million increase in net purchases of short-term investments which was partially offset by a $1.2$3.0 million reduction in capital expenditures. Capital expenditures are expected to be in the $3$3-4 million range for the current fiscal year. In addition, cash outlays for the SST and Ranchview investments totaled $6.5 million in November 2009. Additional cash requirements for an earnout related to the Ranchview acquisition will be funded through future sales of Ranchview products.
Financing Activities
Financing activities consumed cash of $4.9$7.4 million for the six monthsnine-months ended JulyOctober 31, 2009 compared with $9.8$12.1 million used in last year’s comparable period. Cash used in financing activities is primarily for dividend payments and repurchases of common stock. The quarterly per-share cash dividend was increased by 8 percent, to 14 cents per share in the second quarter. Dividends of $4.9$7.4 million or 2741 cents per share were paid in the current year compared to $4.7$7.0 million in the first half of fiscal 2009.prior year. Treasury stock purchases totaled $5.2 million for the first six monthsnine-months of last year, just prior to the suspension of theyear. The share repurchase program was suspended in July 2008.

14


OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS AND CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
There have been no material changes since the fiscal year ended January 31, 2009.
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued the Accounting Standards Codification (Codification), which became the single source of authoritative generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States, other than rules and interpretive releases issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Codification is a reorganization of current GAAP into a topical format that eliminates the current GAAP hierarchy and instead establishes two levels of guidance — authoritative and non-authoritative. All non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature that is not included in the Codification will become non-authoritative. The company adopted the Codification in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 which resulted in no changes to the content of the company’s financial statements or disclosures.
At the beginning of fiscal 2010, the company adopted SFAS No. 161,DisclosuresFASB guidance that amends required disclosures about Derivative Instrumentsderivative instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. SFAS No. 161hedging activities. This guidance requires enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why derivative instruments are used, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. The adoption of SFAS No. 161this guidance had no impact on the company’s consolidated results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
At the beginning of fiscal 2010, the company adopted FSP No. FAS 142-3,Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets, whichFASB guidance that amends the list of factors an entitythat should considerbe considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used in determining the useful life of recognized intangible assets under SFAS No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The new guidance appliesapply to (1) intangible assets that are acquired individually or with a group of other assets, and (2) intangible assets acquired in both business combinations and asset acquisitions. Under FSP No. FAS 142-3, entitiesEntities estimating the useful life of a recognized intangible asset must consider their historical experience in renewing or extending similar arrangements or, in the absence of historical experience, must consider assumptions that market participants would use about renewal or extension. As this guidance applies only to assets acquired in the future, the company is not able to predict the impact, if any, on the company’s consolidated results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
As of July 31, 2009, the company adopted SFAS No. 165,Subsequent Events,FASB guidance which establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. In particular, this Statementguidance sets forth: (1) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements; (2) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements and (3) the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. The adoption of SFAS No. 165this guidance did not have a material impact on the company’s consolidated results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. In accordance with SFAS No. 165,this guidance, the company has evaluated subsequent events through the date and time the financial statementsfinancials were issued on September 2,December 4, 2009.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168,amended its guidance on accounting for variable interest entities. This guidance alters the approach to determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity and requires companies to more frequently assess whether they must consolidate variable interest entities. The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162. SFAS 168 establishes a two-level GAAP hierarchy for nongovernmental entities: authoritative guidance and non-authoritative guidance. The FASB will no longer issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions, and EITF Abstracts; instead, the Board will issue new guidance as Accounting Standards Updates, which will include revisions to the codification, as well as background information and the Board’s basis for conclusions for new guidance. SFAS No. 168 is effective for interim andthe first annual reporting period beginning after November 15, 2009 and for interim periods ending after September 15, 2009.within that first annual reporting period. The company will adopt this guidance on February 1, 2010 and is currently assessing the potential impacts, if any, on its financial statements and disclosures.
In October 2009, the FASB issued guidance on the accounting for multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. This guidance establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable; eliminates the residual method of allocation and requires arrangement consideration be allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method; and requires a vendor to determine its best estimate of selling price in a manner consistent with that used to determine the selling price of the deliverable on a stand alone basis. This guidance also expands the required disclosures related to a vendor’s multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. The guidance is effective beginning February 1, 2011 with early adoption permitted. The company has adopted the new guidance prospectively from the beginning of SFAS No. 168 will not have anthe fiscal year and determined that there is no material impact on the company’sits consolidated results of operations, financial condition, cash flows, or cash flows.disclosures.

15


ITEM 3.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS
The exposure to market risks pertains mainly to changes in interest rates on cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments. The company has no debt. The company does not expect operating results or cash flows to be significantly affected by changes in interest rates. Additionally, the company does not enter into derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

14


However, the company does utilize derivative financial instruments to manage the economic impact of fluctuation in foreign currency exchange rates on those transactions that are denominated in currency other than its functional currency, which is the U.S. dollar. The use of these financial instruments had no material effect on the company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
The company’s subsidiaries that operate outside the United States use their local currency as the functional currency. The functional currency is translated into U.S. dollars for balance sheet accounts using the period-end exchange rates, and average exchange rates for the statement of income. Adjustments resulting from financial statement translations are included as cumulative translation adjustments in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within shareholders’ equity. Foreign currency transaction gains or losses are recognized in the period incurred and are included in “interest income and other,“other expense (income), net” in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Foreign currency fluctuations had no material effect on the company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
ITEM 4.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of JulyOctober 31, 2009, the end of the period covered by this report, management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and the Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) evaluated the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of such date. Based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that the company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of JulyOctober 31, 2009.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended JulyOctober 31, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements contained in this quarterly report onForm 10-Q are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including statements regarding the expectations, beliefs, intentions or strategies regarding the future. Without limiting the foregoing, the words “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “plans” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The company intends that all forward-looking statements be subject to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. Although management believes that the expectations reflected in forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, there is no assurance that these assumptions are correct or that these expectations will be achieved. Assumptions involve important risks and uncertainties that could significantly affect results in the future. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those relating to weather conditions and commodity prices, which could affect sales and profitability in some of the company’s primary markets, such as agriculture, construction, and oil and gas well drilling; or changes in competition, raw material availability, technology or relationships with the company’s largest customers-any of which could adversely affect any of the company’s product lines, as well as other risks described in the company’s 10-K under Item 1A. This list is not exhaustive, and the company does not have an obligation to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date these statements are made.

1516


RAVEN INDUSTRIES, INC.
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.Item 1. Legal Proceedings:
The company is involved as a defendant in lawsuits, claims or disputes arising in the normal course of business. The settlement of such claims cannot be determined at this time. Management believes that any liability resulting from these claims will be substantially mitigated by insurance coverage. Accordingly, management does not believe the ultimate outcome of these matters will be significant to its results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Item 1A.Item 1A. Risk Factors: No material change.
Item 2.Item 2. Changes in Securities:
Under a resolution from the Board of Directors dated March 15, 2008, the company was authorized to repurchase up to $10 million of stock on the open market. No shares were repurchased during the first halfthree quarters of fiscal 2010. Approximately $5.1 million of the repurchase authorization remains open; however, the company temporarily suspended the share repurchase program in July 2008.
Item 3.Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities: None
Item 4.Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders:
The company’s annual meeting of stockholders was held May 21, 2009.
ElectionMatters to a Vote of Directors
The following members were elected to the company’s Board of Directors to hold office for the ensuing year.
         
Nominee In Favor  Withheld 
Anthony W. Bour  16,541,384   105,249 
David A. Christensen  11,174,734   5,471,899 
Thomas S. Everist  16,549,507   97,126 
Mark E. Griffin  16,545,536   101,097 
Conrad J. Hoigaard  16,503,121   143,512 
Kevin T. Kirby  16,573,542   73,091 
Cynthia H. Milligan  16,568,168   78,465 
Ronald M. Moquist  16,559,602   87,031 
Daniel A. Rykhus  16,548,424   98,209 
Ratification of the Appointment of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent auditors was ratified by the stockholders with 16,564,307 votes cast in favor of the proposal, 55,183 votes cast against the proposal, and 27,188 votes abstained.Security Holders: None
Item 5.Item 5. Other Information: None
Item 6.Item 6. Exhibits Filed:
 
31.1 Certification of CEO Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act
 
 31.2 Certification of CFO Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act
 
 32.1 Certification of CEO Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act
 
 32.2 Certification of CFO Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act

16


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
     
 RAVEN INDUSTRIES, INC.
 
 
 /s/ Thomas Iacarella   
 Thomas Iacarella  
 Vice President and CFO, Secretary and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) 
 
 
Date: September 2,December 4, 2009

17