UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)


þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010


o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 000-04065

Lancaster Colony Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Ohio		13-1955943
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

37 West Broad Street		43215
Columbus, Ohio		~~43215~~(Zip Code)
(Address of principal executive offices)		~~(Zip Code)~~

614-224-7141
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesþ Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).Yeso Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):


Large accelerated filerþ		Accelerated filero		Non-accelerated filero (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting companyo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).Yeso Noþ

As of ~~January 29,~~April 30, 2010, there were approximately ~~28,203,000~~28,249,000 shares of Common Stock, without par value, outstanding.

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

TABLE OF CONTENTS


PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION			3

Item 1. Consolidated Financial ~~Statements:~~Statements (unaudited):			3

Consolidated Balance Sheets — ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010 and June 30, 2009			3

Consolidated Statements of Income — Three and ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009			4

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009			5

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements			6

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			1617

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk			2425

Item 4. Controls and Procedures			2425

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION			25

Item 1A. Risk Factors			25

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			25

~~Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders~~			25

Item 6. Exhibits			25

SIGNATURES			26

INDEX TO EXHIBITS			27

~~EX-31.1~~Exhibit 31.1
~~EX-31.2~~Exhibit 31.2
~~EX-32~~Exhibit 32

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION


~~Item 1.~~		Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(UNAUDITED)


		December 31			June 30				March 31			June 30
(Amounts in thousands, except share data)		2009			2009				2010			2009
ASSETS	ASSETS							ASSETS

Current Assets:
Cash and equivalents		$	91,391		$	38,484			$	95,662		$	38,484
Receivables (less allowance for doubtful accounts, December — $847 and June — $942)			85,484			61,152
Receivables (less allowance for doubtful accounts, March — $776 and June — $942)										80,011			61,152
Inventories:
Raw materials			30,637			33,067				31,547			33,067
Finished goods and work in process			51,659			69,456				65,806			69,456

Total inventories			82,296			102,523				97,353			102,523
Deferred income taxes and other current assets			23,231			20,653				29,848			20,653

Total current assets			282,402			222,812				302,874			222,812

Property, Plant and Equipment:
Land, buildings and improvements			129,074			130,683				129,181			130,683
Machinery and equipment			234,941			239,380				239,536			239,380

Total cost			364,015			370,063				368,717			370,063
Less accumulated depreciation			199,056			199,163				202,932			199,163

Property, plant and equipment — net			164,959			170,900				165,785			170,900

Other Assets:
Goodwill			89,840			89,840				89,840			89,840
Other intangible assets — net			10,096			10,678				9,805			10,678
Other noncurrent assets			3,958			4,251				3,557			4,251


Total		$	551,255		$	498,481			$	571,861		$	498,481


LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY	LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY							LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable		$	37,643		$	41,180			$	41,434		$	41,180
Accrued liabilities			32,695			33,399				33,553			33,399

Total current liabilities			70,338			74,579				74,987			74,579

Other Noncurrent Liabilities			16,776			16,719				15,676			16,719

Deferred Income Taxes			5,195			4,627				5,671			4,627

Shareholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock — authorized 3,050,000 shares; outstanding — none
Common stock — authorized 75,000,000 shares; outstanding — December — 28,201,359 shares; June — 28,101,885 shares			93,537			88,962
Common stock — authorized 75,000,000 shares; outstanding — March — 28,248,471 shares; June — 28,101,885 shares										94,294			88,962
Retained earnings			1,049,921			998,476				1,065,671			998,476
Accumulated other comprehensive loss			(8,715	)		(9,085	)			(8,641	)		(9,085	)
Common stock in treasury, at cost			(675,797	)		(675,797	)			(675,797	)		(675,797	)

Total shareholders’ equity			458,946			402,556				475,527			402,556


Total		$	551,255		$	498,481			$	571,861		$	498,481

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(UNAUDITED)


	Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended					Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	December 31					December 31					March 31						March 31
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)	2009		2008			2009		2008			2010			2009			2010		2009


Net Sales	$	304,115	$	288,242		$	558,275	$	552,079		$	250,328		$	246,027		$	808,603	$	798,106

Cost of Sales		219,338		230,079			409,791		454,247			188,405			193,385			598,196		647,632


Gross Margin		84,777		58,163			148,484		97,832			61,923			52,642			210,407		150,474

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses		24,400		21,917			44,868		42,178			24,328			20,155			69,196		62,333

Restructuring and Impairment Charges		1,216		(8	)		2,046		1,606			87			—			2,133		1,606


Operating Income		59,161		36,254			101,570		54,048			37,508			32,487			139,078		86,535

Other (Expense) Income:
Interest expense		—		(639	)		—		(1,130	)		—			(64	)		—		(1,194	)
Other income — Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act		893		8,696			893		8,696			—			—			893		8,696
Interest income and other — net		34		(271	)		59		(196	)		(6	)		65			53		(131	)


Income Before Income Taxes		60,088		44,040			102,522		61,418			37,502			32,488			140,024		93,906

Taxes Based on Income		20,561		15,588			34,590		21,946			13,280			11,275			47,870		33,221


Net Income	$	39,527	$	28,452		$	67,932	$	39,472		$	24,222		$	21,213		$	92,154	$	60,685


Net Income Per Common Share:
Basic and Diluted	$	1.40	$	1.02		$	2.41	$	1.40		$	.86		$	.76		$	3.27	$	2.16

Cash Dividends Per Common Share	$	.30	$	.285		$	.585	$	.565		$	.30		$	.285		$	.885	$	.85

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding:
Basic		28,147		27,948			28,114		28,105			28,173			27,933			28,134		28,048
Diluted		28,176		27,955			28,145		28,110			28,198			27,938			28,163		28,053

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)


	Six Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	December 31						March 31
(Amounts in thousands)	2009			2008			2010			2009


Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net income	$	67,932		$	39,472		$	92,154		$	60,685
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		10,882			10,970			15,666			16,362
Deferred income taxes and other noncash changes		909			(420	)		1,777			3,493
Restructuring and impairment charges		528			(1,221	)		528			(1,221	)
Gain on disposal of property		(3	)		(776	)		(25	)		(868	)
Pension plan activity		251			(28	)		(405	)		(2,490	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Receivables		(24,714	)		(15,834	)		(19,204	)		(13,218	)
Inventories		20,047			24,444			4,990			29,586
Other current assets		(2,560	)		11,949			(9,350	)		10,314
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(4,091	)		(5,663	)		743			(9,867	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		69,181			62,893			86,874			92,776


Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
Payments on property additions		(3,701	)		(6,749	)		(8,088	)		(8,941	)
Proceeds from sale of property		6			1,263			28			1,991
Other — net		(720	)		(964	)		(953	)		(1,026	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(4,415	)		(6,450	)		(9,013	)		(7,976	)


Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Proceeds from debt		—			25,000			—			25,000
Payments on debt		—			(35,000	)		—			(65,000	)
Purchase of treasury stock		—			(16,894	)		—			(16,894	)
Payment of dividends		(16,487	)		(15,877	)		(24,959	)		(23,850	)
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options		3,923			—			4,276			—
Increase (decrease) in cash overdraft balance		705			(2,749	)
Decrease in cash overdraft balance								—			(4,209	)

Net cash used in financing activities		(11,859	)		(45,520	)		(20,683	)		(84,953	)


Net change in cash and equivalents		52,907			10,923			57,178			(153	)
Cash and equivalents at beginning of year		38,484			19,417			38,484			19,417

Cash and equivalents at end of period	$	91,391		$	30,340		$	95,662		$	19,264


Supplemental Disclosure of Operating Cash Flows:
Cash paid during the period for income taxes	$	32,448		$	2,964		$	55,634		$	18,803

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands, except ~~share and~~ per share data)

Note 1 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by ~~generally accepted accounting principles~~GAAP for complete financial statements. In our opinion, the interim consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations and financial position for such periods. All such adjustments reflected in the interim consolidated financial statements are considered to be of a normal recurring nature. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year. Accordingly, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto contained in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Unless otherwise noted, the term “year” and references to a particular year pertain to our fiscal year, which begins on July 1 and ends on June 30; for example, 2010 refers to fiscal 2010, which is the period from July 1, 2009 to June 30, 2010.

Subsequent Events

We have evaluated events occurring between the end of our most recent fiscal quarter and ~~February 5, 2010,~~ the date the financial statements were ~~issued.~~issued and noted no events that would require recognition or disclosure in these financial statements.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Purchases of property, plant and equipment included in accounts payable at ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009 were approximately ~~$0.1~~$0.5 million and ~~less than~~ $0.1 million, respectively. These purchases, less the preceding June 30 balances, have been excluded from the property additions and the change in accounts payable in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Earnings Per Share

Effective July 1, 2009, we adopted the provisions of a Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Staff Position (“FSP”) on the FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities,” which is now part of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 260, “Earnings Per Share.” This FSP addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share (“EPS”) under the two-class method described in ~~generally accepted accounting principles~~GAAP for EPS. The restricted stock we previously granted to employees was deemed to meet the definition of a participating security as the employees receive nonforfeitable dividends before the stock becomes vested. Our adoption of this FSP required that we retrospectively restate EPS for all periods presented. There was no impact on EPS for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008.~~2009.

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except ~~share and~~ per share data)

Basic and diluted net income per common share were calculated as follows:


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	December 31						December 31						Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	2009			2008			2009			2008			March 31						March 31
													2010			2009			2010			2009
Net income	$	39,527		$	28,452		$	67,932		$	39,472		$	24,222		$	21,213		$	92,154		$	60,685
Net income allocated to participating securities		(39	)		(23	)		(68	)		(32	)		(45	)		(22	)		(158	)		(59	)

Net income allocated to common shareholders	$	39,488		$	28,429		$	67,864		$	39,440		$	24,177		$	21,191		$	91,996		$	60,626


Weighted average common shares outstanding (in thousands):
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic		28,147			27,948			28,114			28,105			28,173			27,933			28,134			28,048
Incremental share effect from:
Stock options		3			—			5			—			1			—			4			—
Restricted stock		4			7			8			5			2			5			6			5
Stock-settled stock appreciation rights		22			—			18			—			22			—			19			—

Diluted		28,176			27,955			28,145			28,110			28,198			27,938			28,163			28,053


Net income per common share — basic and diluted	$	1.40		$	1.02		$	2.41		$	1.40		$	.86		$	.76		$	3.27		$	2.16

Significant Accounting Policies

There were no changes to our Significant Accounting Policies from those disclosed in our 2009 Annual Report onForm 10-K.

Note 2 — Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 132(R)-1, “Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets” (“FSP FAS 132(R)-1”), which is now part of ASC Topic 715, “Compensation-Retirement Benefits.” FSP FAS 132(R)-1 provides guidance on an employer’s disclosures about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. This FSP expands the disclosure set forth in ~~general accounting principles~~GAAP for retirement benefits by adding required disclosures about (1) how investment allocation decisions are made by management, (2) major categories of plan assets, and (3) significant concentration of risk. Additionally, the FSP requires an employer to disclose information about the valuation of plan assets similar to that required under ~~general accounting principles~~GAAP for fair value measurements. This FSP is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009, with earlier adoption permitted. We are currently reviewing the additional disclosure requirements regarding our benefit plans’ assets.

Note 3 — Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill attributable to the Specialty Foods segment was approximately $89.8 million at ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010 and June 30, 2009.

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except ~~share and~~ per share data)

The following table summarizes our identifiable other intangible assets, all included in the Specialty Foods ~~segment, as of December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009:~~segment:


	December 31			June 30			March 31			June 30
	2009			2009			2010			2009
Trademarks (40-year life)
Gross carrying value	$	370		$	370		$	370		$	370
Accumulated amortization		(172	)		(167	)		(175	)		(167	)

Net Carrying Value	$	198		$	203		$	195		$	203

Customer Relationships (12 to 15-year life)
Gross carrying value	$	13,020		$	13,020		$	13,020		$	13,020
Accumulated amortization		(3,586	)		(3,118	)		(3,820	)		(3,118	)

Net Carrying Value	$	9,434		$	9,902		$	9,200		$	9,902

Non-compete Agreements (5 to 8-year life)
Gross carrying value	$	1,540		$	1,540		$	1,540		$	1,540
Accumulated amortization		(1,076	)		(967	)		(1,130	)		(967	)

Net Carrying Value	$	464		$	573		$	410		$	573


Total Net Carrying Value	$	10,096		$	10,678		$	9,805		$	10,678

Amortization expense relating to these assets was approximately $0.3 million and ~~$0.6~~$0.9 million for both the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008,~~2009, respectively. Total annual amortization expense is estimated to be approximately $1.2 million next year, $1.1 million for the second year and $0.9 million for each of the following three years.

Note 4 — Long-Term Debt

At ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010 and June 30, 2009, we had an unsecured revolving credit facility under which we may borrow up to a maximum of $160 million at any one time, with the potential to expand the total credit availability to $260 million based on obtaining consent of the issuing bank and certain other conditions. The facility expires on October 5, 2012, and all outstanding amounts are due and payable on that day. At ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010 and June 30, 2009, we had no borrowings outstanding under this facility. Loans may be used for general corporate purposes.

Based on the long-term nature of this facility and in accordance with ~~generally accepted accounting principles,~~GAAP, when we have outstanding borrowings under this facility, we classify the outstanding balance as long-term debt. We paid no interest for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009,~~2010, as compared to approximately ~~$0.7~~$0.1 million and ~~$1.1~~$1.2 million for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008,~~2009, respectively.

The facility contains two principal financial covenants: an interest expense test that requires us to maintain an interest coverage ratio not less than 2.5 to 1 at the end of each fiscal quarter; and an indebtedness test that requires us to maintain a leverage ratio not greater than 3 to 1 at all times. The interest coverage ratio is calculated by dividing Consolidated EBIT (as defined more specifically in the credit agreement) by Consolidated Interest Expense (as defined more specifically in the credit agreement), and the leverage ratio is calculated by dividing Consolidated Debt (as defined more specifically in the credit agreement) by Consolidated EBITDA (as defined more specifically in the credit agreement). We met the requirements of these financial covenants at ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010 and June 30, 2009.

Note 5 — Pension Benefits

We and certain of our operating subsidiaries provide multiple defined benefit pension plans. Benefits under the plans are primarily based on negotiated rates and years of service and cover the union workers at such locations. We contribute to these plans at least the minimum amount required by regulation or contract. ~~We recognize the cost of plan benefits as the employees render service.~~

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except ~~share and~~ per share data)

The following table discloses net periodic benefit cost for our pension plans:


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	December 31						December 31						March 31						March 31
	2009			2008			2009			2008			2010			2009			2010			2009
Components of net periodic benefit cost
Service cost	$	18		$	30		$	45		$	60		$	—		$	29		$	45		$	89
Interest cost		530			541			1,059			1,082			529			543			1,588			1,625
Expected return on plan assets		(538	)		(602	)		(1,076	)		(1,204	)		(537	)		(566	)		(1,613	)		(1,770	)
Curtailment charge		—			—			349			—			—			331			349			331
Amortization of unrecognized net loss		124			62			248			124			124			83			372			207
Amortization of prior service cost		—			26			5			52			—			19			5			71
Amortization of unrecognized net obligation existing at transition		—			1			—			2			—			—			—			2

Net periodic benefit cost	$	134		$	58		$	630		$	116		$	116		$	439		$	746		$	555

In the first quarter of 2010, one of our plans became subject to curtailment accounting. This resulted in the immediate recognition of all of the outstanding prior service cost of the plan, which was approximately $0.3 million, as required under ~~generally accepted accounting principles~~GAAP for retirement benefits. This charge was included in our Specialty Foods segment.

~~We made no contributions~~In the third quarter of 2009, one of our plans became subject to curtailment accounting. This resulted in the immediate recognition of all of the outstanding prior service cost of the plan, which was approximately $0.3 million, as required under GAAP for retirement benefits. This charge was included in our ~~pension plans during~~corporate expenses within continuing operations because the costs related to the retained liabilities of sold operations.

For the three and nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009. For the six months ended December 31, 2009,~~2010, we made pension plan contributions totaling ~~less than $0.1~~approximately $0.8 million. We do not expect to make ~~approximately $0.8 million more in~~any further contributions to our pension plans during the remainder of 2010.

Note 6 — Postretirement Benefits

We and certain of our operating subsidiaries provide multiple postretirement medical and life insurance benefit plans. We recognize the cost of benefits as the employees render service. Postretirement benefits are funded as incurred.

The following table discloses net periodic benefit cost for our postretirement plans:


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	December 31						December 31						March 31						March 31
	2009			2008			2009			2008			2010			2009			2010			2009
Components of net periodic benefit cost
Service cost	$	4		$	5		$	8		$	9		$	4		$	4		$	12		$	13
Interest cost		48			50			96			99			48			49			144			148
Amortization of unrecognized gain		(3	)		(5	)		(6	)		(9	)		(4	)		(4	)		(10	)		(13	)
Amortization of prior service asset		(1	)		(2	)		(2	)		(3	)		(1	)		(1	)		(3	)		(4	)

Net periodic benefit cost	$	48		$	48		$	96		$	96		$	47		$	48		$	143		$	144

For the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009,~~2010, we made less than $0.1 million and approximately $0.1 million, respectively, in contributions to our postretirement medical and life insurance benefit plans. We ~~expect to make approximately $0.1 million more in contributions to our postretirement medical and life insurance benefit plans during the remainder of 2010.~~

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except ~~share and~~ per share data)

expect to make approximately $0.1 million more in contributions to our postretirement medical and life insurance benefit plans during the remainder of 2010.

Note 7 — Stock-Based Compensation

As approved by our shareholders in November 1995, the terms of the 1995 Key Employee Stock Option Plan (the “1995 Plan”) reserved 3,000,000 common shares for issuance to qualified key employees. All options granted under the 1995 Plan were exercisable at prices not less than fair market value as of the date of grant. The 1995 Plan expired in August 2005, but there ~~are still~~were options ~~outstanding that were~~ issued under this ~~plan.~~plan that were exercisable through February 2010. In general, options granted under the 1995 Plan vested immediately and had a maximum term of five years. Our policy is to issue shares upon option exercise from new shares that had been previously authorized.

Our shareholders approved the adoption of the Lancaster Colony Corporation 2005 Stock Plan (the “2005 Plan”) at our 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The 2005 Plan reserved 2,000,000 common shares for issuance to our employees and directors, and all awards granted under the 2005 Plan will be exercisable at prices not less than fair market value as of the date of the grant. The vesting period for awards granted under the 2005 Plan varies as to the type of award granted, but generally these awards have a maximum term of five years.

Stock Options

Until 2008, we used stock options as the primary vehicle for rewarding certain employees with long-term incentives for their efforts in helping to create long-term shareholder value. Under ~~generally accepted accounting principles~~GAAP for stock-based compensation, we calculated the fair value of option grants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. There were no grants of stock options during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008.~~2009.

We recognized compensation expense over the requisite service period. Total compensation cost related to stock options for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010 was zero, as compared to zero and less than $0.1 million for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008.~~2009, respectively. These amounts were reflected in Selling, General and Administrative Expenses and were allocated to each segment appropriately. No initial tax benefits were recorded for the portion of these compensation costs that relate to incentive stock options, which do not qualify for a tax deduction until, and only if, a disqualifying disposition occurs.

During the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009,~~2010, we received approximately ~~$0.9~~$0.3 million and ~~$3.7~~$4.0 million, respectively, in cash from the exercise of stock options. The aggregate intrinsic value of these options was approximately ~~$0.2~~$0.1 million and ~~$0.8~~$0.9 million, respectively. A related tax benefit of ~~approximately~~less than $0.1 million and approximately $0.3 million was recorded in the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009,~~2010, respectively. These tax benefits were included in the financing section of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and resulted from incentive stock option disqualifying dispositions and exercises of non-qualified options. The benefits include less than $0.1 million of gross windfall tax benefits for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009.~~2010.

There were no stock option exercises during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008.~~

~~The following table summarizes the activity relating to stock options granted under the 1995 Plan mentioned above for the six months ended December 31, 2009:~~

Weighted
Weighted Average
Number Average Remaining Aggregate
of Exercise Contractual Intrinsic
Shares Price Life in Years Value
Outstanding at beginning of period 96,350 $ 41.52
Exercised (88,050 ) 41.52
Forfeited — —

Outstanding at end of period 8,300 $ 41.52 .16 $ 68

Exercisable and vested at end of period 8,300 $ 41.52 .16 $ 68

Vested and expected to vest at end of period 8,300 $ 41.52 .16 $ 68

2009.

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except ~~share and~~ per share data)

~~There were no unvested options at December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009. At December 31, 2009, there was also no unrecognized compensation cost related~~The following table summarizes the activity relating to stock ~~options.~~options granted under the 1995 Plan mentioned above for the nine months ended March 31, 2010:


						Weighted
				Weighted		Average
	Number			Average		Remaining		Aggregate
	of			Exercise		Contractual		Intrinsic
	Shares			Price		Life in Years		Value
Outstanding at beginning of period		96		$	41.52
Exercised		(95	)		41.52
Expired		(1	)		41.52

Outstanding at end of period		—		$	—		—	$	—

Stock-Settled Stock Appreciation Rights

Since 2008, we have used periodic grants of stock-settled stock appreciation rights (“SSSARs”) as a vehicle for rewarding certain employees with long-term incentives for their efforts in helping to create long-term shareholder value. Under ~~generally accepted accounting principles~~GAAP for stock-based compensation, we calculate the fair value of SSSARs grants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. ~~There were no~~

In February 2010 and 2009, we granted 167,950 and 77,700 SSSARs, respectively, to various employees under the terms of the 2005 Plan discussed previously. The weighted average per share fair value of the 2010 SSSARs grant was $11.81 and was estimated at the date of grant using the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 1.67%; dividend yield of 2.04%; volatility factor of the expected market price of our common stock of 29.97%; and a weighted average expected life of 3.5 years. The weighted average per share fair value of the 2009 SSSARs grant was $6.89 and was estimated at the date of grant using the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 1.63%; dividend yield of 2.86%; volatility factor of the expected market price of our common stock of 28.13%; and a weighted average expected life of 3.5 years. For both grants, the volatility factor was estimated based on actual historical volatility of our stock for a time period equal to the term of the SSSARs. The expected average life was calculated using the simplified method as defined in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Staff Accounting Bulletin 110, as we do not yet have sufficient historical exercise experience for this type of grant. The SSSARs ~~during~~from both grants vest one-third on the ~~six months ended December 31, 2009~~first anniversary of the grant date, one-third on the second anniversary of the grant date and ~~2008.~~one-third on the third anniversary of the grant date. We are assuming a forfeiture rate of four percent for each of these grants.

We recognize compensation expense over the requisite service period. Total compensation cost related to SSSARs was approximately $0.2 million and $0.4 million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010, respectively, as compared to approximately $0.1 million and $0.2 million for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, 2009, ~~respectively, as compared to $0.1 million for the three and six months ended December 31, 2008.~~respectively. These amounts were reflected in Selling, General and Administrative Expenses and were allocated to each segment appropriately. We recorded a tax benefit of less than $0.1 million and approximately $0.1 million for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, 2010 and 2009, ~~and 2008,~~ respectively.

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)

The following table summarizes the activity relating to SSSARs granted under the 2005 Plan mentioned above for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009:~~2010:


						Weighted									Weighted
				Weighted		Average							Weighted		Average
	Number			Average		Remaining		Aggregate		Number			Average		Remaining		Aggregate
	of			Exercise		Contractual		Intrinsic		of			Exercise		Contractual		Intrinsic
	Rights			Price		Life in Years		Value		Rights			Price		Life in Years		Value
Outstanding at beginning of period		222,240		$	38.85						222		$	38.85
Exercised		(15,441	)		38.31						(74	)		38.66
Granted		—			—						168			58.79
Forfeited		(1,417	)		38.31						(1	)		38.31

Outstanding at end of period		205,382		$	38.90		3.54	$	2,215		315		$	49.54		4.17	$	2,945

Exercisable and vested at end of period		27,315		$	38.31		3.16	$	311		45		$	38.63		3.12	$	909

Vested and expected to vest at end of period		198,549		$	38.89		3.54	$	2,142		301		$	49.57		4.17	$	2,809

The following table summarizes the status of, and changes to, unvested SSSARs during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009:~~2010:


				Weighted					Weighted
	Number			Average		Number			Average
	of			Grant Date		of			Grant Date
	Rights			Fair Value		Rights			Fair Value
Unvested at beginning of period		179,234		$	6.39		179		$	6.39
Granted		—			—		168			11.81
Vested		—			—		(76	)		6.30
Forfeited		(1,167	)		6.00		(1	)		6.00

Unvested at end of period		178,067		$	6.39		270		$	9.78

At ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009,~~2010, there was approximately ~~$0.7~~$2.4 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to SSSARs that we will recognize over a weighted-average period of approximately ~~1.68~~2.55 years.

Restricted Stock

Since 2008, we have used periodic grants of restricted stock as a vehicle for rewarding our nonemployee directors and certain employees with long-term incentives for their efforts in helping to create long-term shareholder value.

~~LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)~~
~~(Tabular amounts~~In February 2010 and 2009, we granted a total of 25,000 and 5,800 shares of restricted stock, respectively, to various key employees under the terms of the 2005 Plan discussed above. The restricted stock granted in ~~thousands, except share and~~2010 had a grant date fair value of approximately $1.5 million based on a per share ~~data)~~closing stock price of $58.79. The restricted stock granted in 2009 had a grant date fair value of approximately $0.2 million based on a per share closing stock price of $39.86. The restricted stock under each of these grants vests on the third anniversary of the grant date. We are assuming a forfeiture rate of four percent for each of these grants. Under the terms of the grants, employees will receive dividends on unforfeited restricted stock regardless of their vesting status.

On November 16, 2009, we granted a total of 8,435 shares of restricted stock to our seven nonemployee directors under the terms of the 2005 Plan discussed above. The restricted stock had a grant date fair value of approximately $0.4 million based on a per share closing stock price of $50.86. This restricted stock vests over a one-year period, and all of these shares are expected to vest. Dividends earned on the stock during the vesting period are held in escrow and will be paid to the directors at the time the stock vests. ~~Compensation expense related to the restricted stock award will be recognized over the requisite service period.~~ An additional 14,000 shares of restricted stock that were granted to our seven nonemployee directors on November 17, 2008 vested during the second quarter of 2010, and the directors were paid the related dividends that had been held in escrow.

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)

We recognize compensation expense over the requisite service period. Total compensation cost related to restricted stock for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010 was approximately $0.2 million and ~~$0.4~~$0.6 million, respectively, as compared to approximately ~~$0.1~~$0.2 million and ~~$0.2~~$0.4 million in the corresponding periods of the prior year. These amounts were reflected in Selling, General and Administrative Expenses and were allocated to each segment appropriately. We recorded a tax benefit of approximately $0.1 million and $0.2 million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010, respectively, as compared to less than $0.1 million and approximately $0.1 million ~~for~~in the ~~three and six months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.~~corresponding periods of the prior year.

The following table summarizes the activity related to restricted stock granted under the 2005 Plan mentioned above for the ~~six-month period~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009:~~2010:


				Weighted					Weighted
	Number			Average		Number			Average
	of			Grant Date		of			Grant Date
	Shares			Fair Value		Shares			Fair Value
Unvested restricted stock at beginning of period		42,950		$	35.61		43		$	35.61
Granted		8,435			50.86		33			56.79
Vested		(14,300	)		29.57		(14	)		29.57
Forfeited		(150	)		38.31		—			—

Unvested restricted stock at end of period		36,935		$	41.42		62		$	48.46

Expected to vest restricted stock at end of period		36,365		$	41.46		60		$	48.35

At ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009,~~2010, there was approximately ~~$0.9~~$2.0 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted stock that we will recognize over a weighted average period of ~~1.22~~approximately 2.28 years.

Note 8 — Restructuring and Impairment Charges

Specialty Foods Segment — Fiscal 2010

In the first quarter of 2010, we committed to a plan to close our dressings and sauces manufacturing operation located in Wilson, New York. This decision was intended to provide greater efficiency in our Specialty Foods segment by consolidating most of this facility’s operations into other existing plants, outsourcing certain requirements and exiting less profitable dressing lines. Production at this facility was phased out in the second quarter of 2010, and while timing of the disposal of the associated real estate is difficult to predict, this closure was essentially complete at December 31, 2009. The operations of this location have not been reclassified to discontinued operations in accordance with ~~generally accepted accounting principles~~GAAP for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets.

During the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009,~~2010, we recorded restructuring charges of approximately ~~$1.3~~$0.1 million ~~($0.9~~(less than $0.1 million after taxes) and ~~$2.2~~$2.3 million ($1.5 million after taxes), respectively, including approximately ~~$0.1 million and~~ $0.2 million recorded in Cost of Sales for the write-down of ~~inventories during the three and six months ended December 31, 2009, respectively.~~inventories. The remaining charges consisted of one-time termination benefits, a pension curtailment charge and other various closing costs. Cash expenditures for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010 were approximately ~~$1.7~~$0.1 million and $1.8 million, respectively, and were for the one-time termination benefits and other closing costs.

1213

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except ~~share and~~ per share data)

An analysis of the restructuring activity for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010 recorded within the Specialty Foods segment follows:


	Accrual at				2010			Accrual at		Accrual at				2010			Accrual at
	June 30,		2010		Cash			December 31,		June 30,		2010		Cash			March 31,
	2009		Charges		Outlays			2009		2009		Charges		Outlays			2010
Restructuring Charges
Employee Separation Costs	$	—	$	1,643	$	(1,643	)	$	—	$	—	$	1,643	$	(1,643	)	$	—
Other Costs		—		54		(54	)		—		—		141		(141	)		—

Subtotal	$	—		1,697	$	(1,697	)	$	—	$	—		1,784	$	(1,784	)	$	—

Pension Curtailment Charges				349									349
Inventory Write-Down				179									179

Total Restructuring Charges			$	2,225								$	2,312

~~There may be some other miscellaneous expenses and cash payments, but we~~We do not expect any other ~~significant~~ restructuring costs or cash expenditures related to this closure. The total costs associated with this closure were ultimately less than originally estimated due to the actual timing of the closure and its impact on the one-time termination benefits and also due to lower than expected other closing costs.

Specialty Foods Segment — Fiscal 2009

In the first quarter of 2009, we began consolidating our Atlanta, Georgia dressing operation into our other existing food facilities as part of our cost-reduction efforts within the Specialty Foods segment. During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008,~~2009, we recorded restructuring and impairment charges of approximately $0.8 million ($0.5 million after taxes). This closure was essentially complete at September 30, 2008, and the disposition of the associated real estate occurred in December 2008. We do not expect any other costs or cash expenditures related to this closure.

Other Segments — Fiscal 2009

During fiscal 2007, we initiated our plan to close our industrial glass operation located in Lancaster, Ohio. During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008,~~2009, we recorded additional restructuring and impairment charges of approximately $0.8 million ($0.5 million after taxes) within corporate expenses for costs incurred during the period. The total costs associated with this plant closure totaled approximately $5.7 million. This closure was essentially complete at September 30, 2008. We do not currently expect other significant restructuring costs related to this closure.

Held for Sale

As a result of the current-year closing discussed above, as well as various prior-year restructuring and divestiture activities, we have certain “held for sale” properties with a total net book value of approximately $2.9 million ~~which~~that have been reclassified to current assets and are included in Deferred Income Taxes and Other Current Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. In accordance with ~~generally accepted accounting principles~~GAAP for property, plant and equipment, we are no longer depreciating these “held for sale” assets and they are being actively marketed for sale.

1314

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except ~~share and~~ per share data)

Note 9 — Income Taxes

The gross tax contingency reserve at ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010 was approximately $1.3 million and consisted of tax liabilities of approximately $0.7 million and penalties and interest of approximately $0.6 million. In accordance with ~~generally accepted accounting principles~~GAAP for income taxes, we have classified the entire balance at ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010 as long-term liabilities as these amounts are not expected to be paid within the next 12 months. We expect that the amount of these liabilities will change within the next 12 months; however, we do not expect the change to have a significant effect on our financial position or results of operations. We recognize interest and penalties related to these tax liabilities in income tax expense.

During 2010, we executed several state tax voluntary disclosure agreements. The settlement of these liabilities resulted in pre-tax income of approximately $0.9 million, which impacted our effective tax rate for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010 by approximately ~~0.7%~~0.5%.

Note 10 — Business Segment Information

The following summary of financial information by business segment is consistent with the basis of segmentation and measurement of segment profit or loss presented in our June 30, 2009 consolidated financial statements:


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	December 31						December 31						Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	2009			2008			2009			2008			March 31						March 31
													2010			2009			2010			2009
Net Sales
Specialty Foods	$	243,099		$	245,393		$	459,440		$	466,179		$	216,471		$	216,894		$	675,911		$	683,073
Glassware and Candles		61,016			42,849			98,835			85,900			33,857			29,133			132,692			115,033

Total	$	304,115		$	288,242		$	558,275		$	552,079		$	250,328		$	246,027		$	808,603		$	798,106


Operating Income (Loss)
Specialty Foods	$	56,146		$	39,651		$	99,298		$	63,140		$	38,702		$	35,910		$	138,000		$	99,050
Glassware and Candles		6,142			(1,007	)		7,813			(3,869	)		1,672			(927	)		9,485			(4,796	)
Corporate Expenses		(3,127	)		(2,390	)		(5,541	)		(5,223	)		(2,866	)		(2,496	)		(8,407	)		(7,719	)

Total	$	59,161		$	36,254		$	101,570		$	54,048		$	37,508		$	32,487		$	139,078		$	86,535

Note 11 — Commitments and Contingencies

In addition to the items discussed below, at ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009,~~2010, we were a party to various claims and litigation matters arising in the ordinary course of business. Such matters did not have a material adverse effect on the current-year results of operations and, in our opinion, their ultimate disposition will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements.

The Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (“CDSOA”) provides for the distribution of monies collected by U.S. Customs from antidumping cases to qualifying domestic producers. Our reported CDSOA receipts totaled approximately $0.9 million in the second quarter of 2010, as compared to a distribution of approximately $8.7 million in the corresponding period of 2009. These remittances related to certain candles being imported from the People’s Republic of China.

Legislation was enacted in February 2006 to repeal the applicability of the CDSOA to duties collected on products imported after September 2007. However, all duties collected on an entry filed before October 1, 2007 will continue to be available for distribution under former section 1675(c) of the CDSOA. Accordingly, we may receive some level of annual distributions for an undetermined period of years in the future as the monies collected that relate to entries filed prior to October 2007 are administratively finalized by U.S. Customs. Without further legislative action, we expect these distributions will eventually cease.

1415

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except ~~share and~~ per share data)

The uncertainties surrounding the legislative and administrative challenges have been compounded by cases brought in U.S. courts challenging the CDSOA. In two separate cases, the U.S. Court of International Trade (“CIT”) ruled that the procedure for determining recipients eligible to receive CDSOA distributions is unconstitutional. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed ~~one of the~~both CIT decisions in ~~February~~ 2009, but the ~~case remains~~cases remain subject to further ~~appeal. The second CIT case has been stayed pending resolution of this~~ appeal. Other cases remain pending that challenge certain aspects of the CDSOA, any of which could affect the amount of funds available for distribution, including funds relating to entries prior to October 2007.

The extent to which we may receive any future CDSOA distributions is subject to the legal challenges and uncertainties described above. Accordingly, we cannot predict the amount of future distributions, and it is possible that we may not receive any further distributions. Any reduction in CDSOA distributions could reduce our earnings and cash flow.

Note 12 — Comprehensive Income

Total comprehensive income for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010 was approximately ~~$39.6~~$24.3 million and ~~$68.3~~$92.6 million, respectively. Total comprehensive income for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008~~2009 was approximately ~~$28.5~~$17.9 million and ~~$39.6~~$57.5 million, respectively. The ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009 comprehensive income consists of net income and the amortization of pension and postretirement ~~amortization.~~losses.

1516


~~Item 2.~~		Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Tabular dollars in thousands)

OVERVIEW

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) describes the matters that we consider to be important in understanding the results of our operations for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010 and our financial condition as of ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009.~~2010. Our fiscal year begins on July 1 and ends on June 30. Unless otherwise noted, references to “year” pertain to our fiscal year; for example, 2010 refers to fiscal 2010, which is the period from July 1, 2009 to June 30, 2010. In the discussion that follows, we analyze the results of our operations for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009,~~2010, including the trends in our overall business, followed by a discussion of our financial condition.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, all included elsewhere in this report. The forward-looking statements in this section and other parts of this report involve risks and uncertainties including statements regarding our plans, objectives, goals, strategies, and financial performance. Our actual results could differ materially from the results anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of factors set forth under the caption “Forward-Looking Statements.”

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Business Overview

Lancaster Colony Corporation is a diversified manufacturer and marketer of consumer products focusing primarily on specialty foods for the retail and foodservice markets. We also manufacture and market candles for the food, drug and mass markets. Less significantly, we are also engaged in the distribution of various products, including glassware and candles, to commercial markets. Our operations are organized in two reportable segments: “Specialty Foods” and “Glassware and Candles.” Over 90% of the sales of each segment are made to customers in the United States.

In recent years, our strategy has shifted away from operating businesses in a variety of industries towards emphasizing the growth and success we have achieved in our Specialty Foods segment. Fiscals 2008 and 2007 were significant years in implementing this strategy as we divested nonfood operations and focused our capital investment in the Specialty Foods segment.

We view our food operations as having the potential to achieve future growth in sales and profitability due to attributes such as:

	•		leading retail market positions in several branded products with a high-quality perception;

	•		a broad customer base in both retail and foodservice accounts;

	•		well-regarded culinary expertise among foodservice accounts;

	•		recognized leadership in foodservice product development;

	•		demonstrated experience in integrating complementary business acquisitions; and

	•		historically strong cash flow generation that supports growth opportunities.

Our goal is to grow our specialty foods retail and foodservice business by:

	•		leveraging the strength of our retail brands to increase current product sales and introduce new products;

	•		growing our foodservice sales through the strength of our reputation in product development and quality; and

	•		pursuing acquisitions that meet our strategic criteria.

1617

We have made substantial capital investments to support our existing food operations and future growth opportunities. Based on our current plans and expectations, we believe that total capital expenditures for 2010 ~~will be approximately~~are likely not to exceed $15 million.

Summary of 2010 Results

The following is a comparative overview of our consolidated operating results for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008.~~2009.

Net sales for the ~~second~~third quarter ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010 increased 6%2% to approximately ~~$304.1~~$250.3 million from the prior-year total of ~~$288.2~~$246.0 million. This sales growth was driven by a ~~42%~~16% increase in sales of the Glassware and Candles segment, as partially offset by a slight decrease in sales of the Specialty Foods segment. Gross margin increased ~~46%~~18% to approximately ~~$84.8~~$61.9 million from the prior-year ~~second~~third quarter total of ~~$58.2~~$52.6 million. Lower raw-material costs, a more favorable sales mix in the Specialty Foods segment and the benefits of higher candle sales contributed to the higher gross margins. Other income for the current-year second quarter totaled approximately $0.9 million compared to $7.8 million in the prior-year comparative period. These figures included Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (“CDSOA”) receipts totaling approximately $0.9 million in the second quarter of 2010 and approximately $8.7 million in the corresponding period of 2009. Net income for the three months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010 totaled approximately ~~$39.5~~$24.2 million, or ~~$1.40~~$.86 per diluted share. Net income totaled approximately ~~$28.5~~$21.2 million, or $.76 per diluted share, in the ~~second~~third quarter of ~~2009, or $1.02 per diluted share.~~2009.

Year-to-date net sales for the period ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010 increased 1% to approximately ~~$558.3~~$808.6 million from the prior year-to-date total of ~~$552.1~~$798.1 million. Gross margin increased to approximately ~~$148.5~~$210.4 million from the prior year-to-date total of ~~$97.8~~$150.5 million. Net income for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010 totaled approximately ~~$67.9~~$92.2 million, or ~~$2.41~~$3.27 per diluted share. Net income totaled approximately ~~$39.5~~$60.7 million, or $2.16 per diluted share, in the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008, or $1.40 per diluted share.~~2009.

RESULTS OF CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS

Net Sales and Gross Margin


																							Three Months Ended											Nine Months Ended
	Three Months Ended											Six Months Ended											March 31											March 31
	December 31											December 31											2010			2009			Change					2010			2009			Change
	2009			2008			Change					2009			2008			Change
Net Sales
Specialty Foods	$	243,099		$	245,393		$	(2,294	)	(1	)%	$	459,440		$	466,179		$	(6,739	)	(1	)%	$	216,471		$	216,894		$	(423	)	0	%	$	675,911		$	683,073		$	(7,162	)	(1	)%
Glassware and Candles		61,016			42,849			18,167		42	%		98,835			85,900			12,935		15	%		33,857			29,133			4,724		16	%		132,692			115,033			17,659		15	%

Total	$	304,115		$	288,242		$	15,873		6	%	$	558,275		$	552,079		$	6,196		1	%	$	250,328		$	246,027		$	4,301		2	%	$	808,603		$	798,106		$	10,497		1	%

Gross Margin	$	84,777		$	58,163		$	26,614		46	%	$	148,484		$	97,832		$	50,652		52	%	$	61,923		$	52,642		$	9,281		18	%	$	210,407		$	150,474		$	59,933		40	%


Gross Margin as a Percentage of Sales		27.9	%		20.2	%							26.6	%		17.7	%							24.7	%		21.4	%							26.0	%		18.9	%

Consolidated net sales for the ~~second~~third quarter and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010 increased 6%2% and 1%, respectively. During both periods, increased sales within the Glassware and Candles segment were partially offset by slightly lower sales within the Specialty Foods segment.

For ~~both~~ the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009,~~2010, net sales of the Specialty Foods segment declined by less than 1%. and 1%, respectively. This decline reflected moderately lower foodservice sales. Foodservice sales declined by approximately ~~8% in both periods~~6% and 9% for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010, respectively, with contributing factors including ~~somewhat~~ weaker ~~demand from~~ restaurant ~~chains~~chain demand and downward pricing adjustments in certain of our customer supply arrangements that occurred as a result of lower key ingredient costs. We believe ~~these~~the foodservice ~~trends may~~weakness will persist toat some ~~degree~~level through the balance of 2010. Retail sales increased approximately 5%6% for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009, with~~2010, on volume growth ~~coming from both frozen~~ and ~~non-frozen products.~~a slightly earlier Easter holiday than in the prior-year comparative period. While pricing for retail products remained relatively firm through the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009,~~2010, competitive conditions could lead to lower net pricing levels among certain products during calendar 2010.

The increase in net sales of the Glassware and Candles segment for both the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010 reflected higher unit volume on improved consumer demand for high-quality, value-priced candles and the introduction and success of various new products.

1718

of new products and higher seasonal sales. We believe that customer order patterns resulted in some amount of seasonal product being sold in the second quarter of 2010 as opposed to in the first quarter of 2009.

As a percentage of sales, our consolidated gross margin for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010 was ~~27.9%~~24.7% and ~~26.6%~~26.0%, respectively, as compared to ~~20.2%~~21.4% and ~~17.7%~~18.9% achieved in the prior-year comparative periods.

In the Specialty Foods segment, gross margin percentages improved in both the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010 as a result of ~~such factors as~~operating efficiency improvements, ~~in operating efficiencies,~~ a stronger retail sales mix and lower commodity costs. We estimate the favorable year-over-year impact of commodity costs for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010 exceeded ~~$13~~$7 million and ~~$31~~$38 million, respectively. We believe that the comparative impact of commodity costs will ~~likely~~ be significantly less beneficial over the balance of 2010, as we expect some of the cost comparisons to turn unfavorable.

In March 2010, we announced a recall of a limited number of veggie and chip dip food products after being notified by one of our suppliers, Basic Food Flavors, Inc., of a recall of an ingredient used in our products due to potential salmonella contamination. We recorded costs of approximately $0.5 million related to this recall in the three months ended March 31, 2010. We estimate the total costs of the recall will be approximately $1.9 million. We expect reimbursement of certain costs incurred over our deductible from our insurance carrier and thus have recorded a receivable of approximately $1.4 million at March 31, 2010.

Gross margin percentages in the Glassware and Candles segment improved from the prior-year periods due to lower material costs, especially for paraffin wax, and higher sales and ~~operating~~production levels. However, we expect paraffin wax cost comparisons to turn unfavorable before the end of 2010.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses


	Three Months Ended										Six Months Ended										Three Months Ended										Nine Months Ended
	December 31										December 31										March 31										March 31
	2009			2008			Change				2009			2008			Change				2010			2009			Change				2010			2009			Change
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses	$	24,400		$	21,917		$	2,483	11	%	$	44,868		$	42,178		$	2,690	6	%	$	24,328		$	20,155		$	4,173	21	%	$	69,196		$	62,333		$	6,863	11	%


SG&A Expenses as a Percentage of Sales		8.0	%		7.6	%						8.0	%		7.6	%						9.7	%		8.2	%						8.6	%		7.8	%

Consolidated selling, general and administrative costs of approximately ~~$24.4~~$24.3 million and ~~$44.9~~$69.2 million for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010, respectively, increased by ~~11%~~21% and 6%11%, respectively, from the ~~$21.9~~$20.2 million and ~~$42.2~~$62.3 million incurred ~~for~~in the ~~three~~corresponding periods of the prior year. Increased costs in consumer-directed marketing initiatives to support retail sales and ~~six months ended December 31, 2008. The higher sales in 2010~~increased professional fees within the Specialty Foods segment contributed to the overall ~~increase as did greater investment in brand marketing initiatives within the Specialty Foods segment.~~increase.

Restructuring and Impairment Charges

Specialty Foods Segment — Fiscal 2010

In the first quarter of 2010, we committed to a plan to close our dressings and sauces manufacturing operation located in Wilson, New York. This decision was intended to provide greater efficiency in our Specialty Foods segment by consolidating most of this facility’s operations into other existing plants, outsourcing certain requirements and exiting less profitable dressing lines. Production at this facility was phased out in the second quarter of 2010, and while timing of the disposal of the associated real estate is difficult to predict, this closure was essentially complete at December 31, 2009. The operations of this location have not been reclassified to discontinued operations in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets.

1819

An analysis of the restructuring activity for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010 recorded within the Specialty Foods segment follows:


	Accrual at				2010			Accrual at		Accrual at				2010			Accrual at
	June 30,		2010		Cash			December 31,		June 30,		2010		Cash			March 31,
	2009		Charges		Outlays			2009		2009		Charges		Outlays			2010
Restructuring Charges
Employee Separation Costs	$	—	$	1,643	$	(1,643	)	$	—	$	—	$	1,643	$	(1,643	)	$	—
Other Costs		—		54		(54	)		—		—		141		(141	)		—

Subtotal	$	—		1,697	$	(1,697	)	$	—	$	—		1,784	$	(1,784	)	$	—

Pension Curtailment Charges				349									349
Inventory Write-Down				179									179

Total Restructuring Charges			$	2,225								$	2,312

Specialty Foods Segment — Fiscal 2009

Other Segments — Fiscal 2009

Held for Sale

1920

Operating Income (Loss)

The foregoing factors contributed to consolidated operating income totaling approximately ~~$59.2~~$37.5 million and ~~$101.6~~$139.1 million for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009,~~2010, respectively. These amounts represent increases of ~~63%~~15% and ~~88%~~61% from the corresponding periods of the prior year. By segment, our operating income can be summarized as follows:


	Three Months Ended											Six Months Ended											Three Months Ended											Nine Months Ended
	December 31											December 31											March 31											March 31
	2009			2008			Change					2009			2008			Change					2010			2009			Change					2010			2009			Change

Operating Income (Loss)

Specialty Foods	$	56,146		$	39,651		$	16,495		42	%	$	99,298		$	63,140		$	36,158		57	%	$	38,702		$	35,910		$	2,792		8	%	$	138,000		$	99,050		$	38,950		39	%

Glassware and Candles		6,142			(1,007	)		7,149		710	%		7,813			(3,869	)		11,682		302	%		1,672			(927	)		2,599		280	%		9,485			(4,796	)		14,281		298	%

Corporate Expenses		(3,127	)		(2,390	)		(737	)	31	%		(5,541	)		(5,223	)		(318	)	6	%		(2,866	)		(2,496	)		(370	)	15	%		(8,407	)		(7,719	)		(688	)	9	%


Total	$	59,161		$	36,254		$	22,907		63	%	$	101,570		$	54,048		$	47,522		88	%	$	37,508		$	32,487		$	5,021		15	%	$	139,078		$	86,535		$	52,543		61	%


Operating Income (Loss) as a Percentage of Sales

Specialty Foods		23.1	%		16.2	%							21.6	%		13.5	%							17.9	%		16.6	%							20.4	%		14.5	%

Glassware and Candles		10.1	%		(2.4	)%							7.9	%		(4.5	)%							4.9	%		(3.2	)%							7.1	%		(4.2	)%

Consolidated		19.5	%		12.6	%							18.2	%		9.8	%							15.0	%		13.2	%							17.2	%		10.8	%

Interest Expense

We incurred no interest expense for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010 as there were no borrowings outstanding during the period. We incurred interest expense of approximately ~~$0.6~~$0.1 million and ~~$1.1~~$1.2 million for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008,~~2009, respectively, related to long-term borrowings.

Other Income — Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act

The ~~CDSOA~~Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (“CDSOA”) provides for the distribution of monies collected by U.S. Customs from antidumping cases to qualifying domestic producers. Our reported CDSOA receipts totaled approximately $0.9 million in the second quarter of 2010, as compared to a distribution of approximately $8.7 million in the corresponding period of 2009. These remittances related to certain candles being imported from the People’s Republic of China.

2021

Income Before Income Taxes

As impacted by the factors discussed above, income before income taxes for the three months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010 increased by approximately ~~$16.1~~$5.0 million to ~~$60.1~~$37.5 million from the prior-year total of ~~$44.0~~$32.5 million. Income before income taxes for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009 was approximately ~~$102.5~~$140.0 million and ~~$61.4~~$93.9 million, respectively. Our effective tax rate of ~~33.7%~~34.2% for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010 decreased from the prior-year rate of ~~35.7%~~35.4%. This decrease reflected, in part, a favorable resolution of certain previously-reserved state and local tax matters in 2010, as further discussed in Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements.

Net Income

~~Second~~Third quarter net income for 2010 of approximately ~~$39.5~~$24.2 million increased from the preceding year’s net income for the quarter of ~~$28.5~~$21.2 million, as influenced by the factors noted above. Year-to-date net income of approximately ~~$67.9~~$92.2 million was higher than the prior year-to-date total of ~~$39.5~~$60.7 million. Net income per share for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2010 totaled ~~$1.40~~$.86 per basic and diluted share, as compared to ~~$1.02~~$.76 per basic and diluted share recorded in the prior year. Year-to-date net income per share was ~~$2.41~~$3.27 per basic and diluted share, as compared to ~~$1.40~~$2.16 per basic and diluted share for the prior-year period.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009,~~2010, net cash provided by operating activities totaled approximately ~~$69.2~~$86.9 million as compared to ~~$62.9~~$92.8 million in the prior-year period. The ~~increase~~decrease results from ~~a higher level of net income, as partially offset by~~ comparatively unfavorable relative changes in working capital components, including receivables, inventory and other current ~~assets.~~assets, as partially offset by a higher level of net income and a comparatively favorable relative change in accounts payable and accrued liabilities. The increase in receivables relates to the strength of sales in March relative to June. This fluctuation was more pronounced in 2010 as influenced by higher consolidated sales and ~~decrease~~a greater sales mix of candles, which tend to bear longer-dated payment terms. The larger decline in inventories ~~since June~~that occurred for the nine months ended March 2009 ~~primarily relates~~related to ~~seasonal influences on sales within~~a then-stronger trend of falling material costs as well as a program to reduce candle inventories to more historic levels. The contrast in the ~~Glassware and Candles segment. The change~~changes in other current assets reflects, in part, the effect of a loss on sale of an automotive operation in late 2008 contributing to a shift from a large prepaid income tax position existing as of June 30, 2008 to an accrued income tax position ~~due to the effect of the loss on the sale of an automotive operation in 2008.~~by March 2009.

Cash used in investing activities for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010 was approximately ~~$4.4~~$9.0 million as compared to ~~$6.5~~$8.0 million in the prior year. This ~~decrease~~increase reflects lower proceeds from the sale of property, as partially offset by a lower level of capital expenditures in 2010.

Cash used in financing activities for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010 of approximately ~~$11.9~~$20.7 million decreased from the prior-year total of ~~$45.5~~approximately $85.0 million due primarily to decreases in treasury share repurchases and the net change in borrowing activity. At ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009,~~2010, approximately 509,000 shares remained authorized for future buyback under the existing share repurchase program.

Under our unsecured revolving credit facility, we may borrow up to a maximum of $160 million at any one time. Loans may be used for general corporate purposes. We currently have no borrowings outstanding under this facility. The facility expires on October 5, 2012, and all outstanding amounts are due and payable on that day.

The facility contains certain restrictive covenants, including limitations on indebtedness, asset sales and acquisitions, and financial covenants relating to interest coverage and leverage. At ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009,~~2010, we were in compliance with all applicable provisions and covenants of the facility, and we met the requirements of the financial covenants by substantial margins.

We currently expect to remain in compliance with the facility’s covenants for the foreseeable future. A default under the facility could accelerate the repayment of any outstanding indebtedness and limit our access

to additional credit available under the facility. Such an event could require curtailment of cash dividends or share repurchases, reduce or delay beneficial expansion or investment plans, or otherwise impact our ability to meet our obligations when due. At ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009,~~2010, we were not aware of any event that would constitute a default under the facility.

We believe that internally generated funds and our existing aggregate balances in cash and equivalents, in addition to our currently available bank credit arrangements, should be adequate to meet our foreseeable cash requirements. If we were to borrow outside of our credit facility under current market terms, our average interest rate may increase significantly and have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

For additional information regarding our credit facility, see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

We have various contractual obligations that are appropriately recorded as liabilities in our consolidated financial statements. Certain other obligations, such as purchase obligations, are not recognized as liabilities in our consolidated financial statements. Examples of obligations not recognized as liabilities in our consolidated financial statements are commitments to purchase raw materials or inventory that have not yet been received as of ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010 and future minimum lease payments for the use of property and equipment under operating lease agreements. Aside from expected changes in raw-material needs due to changes in product demand, there have been no significant changes to the contractual obligations disclosed in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

There have been no changes in critical accounting policies from those disclosed in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In December 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued a FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. FAS 132(R)-1, “Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets” (“FSP FAS 132(R)-1”), which is now part of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 715, “Compensation-Retirement Benefits.” FSP FAS 132(R)-1 provides guidance on an employer’s disclosures about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. This FSP expands the disclosure set forth in ~~general accounting principles~~GAAP for retirement benefits by adding required disclosures about (1) how investment allocation decisions are made by management, (2) major categories of plan assets, and (3) significant concentration of risk. Additionally, the FSP requires an employer to disclose information about the valuation of plan assets similar to that required under ~~general accounting principles~~GAAP for fair value measurements. This FSP is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009, with earlier adoption permitted. We are currently reviewing the additional disclosure requirements regarding our benefit plans’ assets.

RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

Effective July 1, 2009, we adopted the provisions of a FSP on the FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities,” which is now part of ASC Topic 260, “Earnings Per Share.” This FSP addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share (“EPS”) under the two-class method described in ~~generally accepted accounting principles~~GAAP for EPS. The restricted stock we previously granted to employees was deemed to meet the definition of a participating security as the employees receive nonforfeitable dividends before the stock becomes vested. Our adoption of this FSP required that we retrospectively restate EPS for all periods presented. There was no impact on EPS for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008.~~2009. See further discussion in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

We desire to take advantage of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “PSLRA”). This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains various “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the PSLRA and other applicable securities laws. Such statements can be identified by the use of the forward-looking words “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project,” “believe,” “intend,”

~~“plan,~~ “plan,” “expect,” “hope,” or similar words. These statements discuss future expectations; contain projections regarding future developments, operations or financial conditions; or state other forward-looking information. Such statements are based upon assumptions and assessments made by us in light of our experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments, and other factors we believe to be appropriate. These forward-looking statements involve various important risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ as a result of factors over which we have no, or limited, control including, without limitation, the specific influences outlined below. Management believes these forward-looking statements to be reasonable; however, you should not place undue reliance on such statements that are based on current expectations. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update such forward-looking statements. More detailed statements regarding significant events that could affect our financial results are included in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K and also our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Specific influences relating to these forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:

	•		the potential for loss of larger programs or key customer relationships;

	•		the effect of consolidation of customers within key market channels;

	•		the continued solvency of key customers;

	•		the success and cost of new product development efforts;

	•		the lack of market acceptance of new products;

	•		the reaction of customers or consumers to the effect of price increases we may implement;

	•		changes in demand for our products, which may result from loss of brand reputation or customer goodwill;

	•		changes in market trends;

	•		the extent to which future business acquisitions are completed and acceptably integrated;

	•		the possible occurrence of product recalls;

	•		efficiencies in plant operations, including the ability to optimize overhead utilization in candle operations;

	•		the overall strength of the economy;

	•		changes in financial markets;

	•		slower than anticipated sales growth;

	•		the extent of operational efficiencies achieved;

	•		price and product competition;

	•		the uncertainty regarding the effect or outcome of any decision to explore further strategic alternatives among our nonfood operations;

	•		fluctuations in the cost and availability of raw materials;

	•		adverse changes in energy costs and other factors that may affect costs of producing, distributing or transporting our products;

	•		the impact of fluctuations in our pension plan asset values on funding levels, contributions required and benefit costs;

	•		maintenance of competitive position with respect to other manufacturers, including import sources of production;


	•		dependence on key personnel;

	•		stability of labor relations;

	•		~~fluctuations in energy costs;~~

	•		dependence on contract copackers;

	•		effect of governmental regulations, including environmental matters;


	•		legislation and litigation affecting the future administration of the CDSOA;

	•		access to any required financing;

	•		changes in income tax laws;

	•		unexpected costs relating to the holding or disposition of idle real estate;

	•		changes in estimates in critical accounting judgments; and

	•		innumerable other factors.


~~Item 3.~~		Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Our market risks have not changed materially from those disclosed in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.


~~Item 4.~~		Item 4. Controls and Procedures

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer evaluated, with the participation of management, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)). Based upon this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009~~2010 to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is 1) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and 2) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, in a manner that allows timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.No changes were made to our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during our most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION


~~Item 1A.~~		Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed under Item 1A in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.


~~Item 2.~~		Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(c) In August 2007, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase authorization of 2,000,000 shares, of which approximately 509,000 shares remained authorized for future repurchases at ~~December~~March 31, ~~2009.~~2010. In the ~~second~~third quarter, we made no repurchases of our common stock. This share repurchase authorization does not have a stated expiration date.


~~Item 4.~~		~~Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders~~

We held our 2009 Annual Meeting of the Shareholders on November 16, 2009. Proxies for the meeting were solicited pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The following three incumbent directors, whose terms will expire in 2012, were elected at the annual meeting:

Shares Shares
Voted Shares Not
“For” “Withheld” Voted

James B. Bachmann 26,515,101 122,201 1,534,459
Neeli Bendapudi 25,962,135 675,167 1,534,459
John L. Boylan 25,180,818 1,456,484 1,534,459

The shareholders also ratified the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending June 30, 2010. This proposal was ratified by 26,542,649 shares voted for; 71,817 shares voted against; and 22,836 shares abstained.


~~Item 6.~~		Item 6. Exhibits

See Index to Exhibits following Signatures.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


		Lancaster Colony Corporation

	~~Lancaster Colony Corporation~~	(Registrant)
	~~(Registrant)~~
Date: ~~February 5,~~May 10, 2010		By:	/s/John B. Gerlach, Jr. John B. Gerlach, Jr.
		~~John B. Gerlach, Jr.~~
		Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, ~~President and Director~~ ~~(Principal Executive Officer)~~

~~Date: February 5, 2010~~	~~By:~~ President and Director	~~/s/John L. Boylan~~
		~~John L. Boylan~~	(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: May 10, 2010		By:	/s/John L. Boylan

			John L. Boylan Treasurer, Vice President, Assistant Secretary,
			Chief Financial Officer and Director
			(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

FORM 10-Q
~~DECEMBER~~

MARCH 31, ~~2009~~
2010

INDEX TO EXHIBITS


Exhibit
Number		Description	Located at

	31.1	Certification of CEO under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Filed herewith

	31.2	Certification of CFO under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Filed herewith

	32	Certification of CEO and CFO under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Filed herewith


	Shares				Shares
	Voted		Shares		Not
	“For”		“Withheld”		Voted

James B. Bachmann		26,515,101		122,201		1,534,459
Neeli Bendapudi		25,962,135		675,167		1,534,459
John L. Boylan		25,180,818		1,456,484		1,534,459