UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark one)
   
þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended January 31,April 30, 2010
OR
   
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                    to                    
Commission file number: 0-21969
Ciena Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
   
Delaware23-2725311
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 23-2725311
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
   
1201 Winterson Road, Linthicum, MD21090

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
 21090
(Zip Code)
(410) 865-8500
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YESþ     NOo
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YESo     NOo
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filerþAccelerated fileroNon-accelerated filero
(do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting companyo
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as determined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YESo     NOþ
     Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:
   
Class Outstanding at February 26,June 4, 2010
common stock, $.01 par value 92,570,58593,093,998
 
 

 


 

CIENA CORPORATION
INDEX
FORM 10-Q
     
  PAGE NUMBER PAGE

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
NUMBER
     
 3 
     
Item 1. 3
     
 43
     
 54
     
 65
     
6
Item 2. 2631
     
 4054
     
 54
 41
 
     

PART II – OTHER INFORMATIONItem 1.
55
     
 4156
     
 42
 5467
     
 5467
     
 5468
     
 5468
     
 5468
     
 5669
 EX-2.1
 EX-2.2
 EX-2.3
EX-2.4
EX-10.1
EX-10.2
EX-10.3
 EX-31.1
 EX-31.2
 EX-32.1
 EX-32.2

2


PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
CIENA CORPORATION
CIENA CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
                        
 Quarter Ended January 31,  Quarter Ended April 30, Six Months Ended April 30, 
 2009 2010  2009 2010 2009 2010 
Revenue:  
Products $139,717 $149,054  $118,849 $206,420 $258,566 $355,474 
Services 27,683 26,822  25,352 47,051 53,035 73,873 
              
Total revenue 167,400 175,876  144,201 253,471 311,601 429,347 
              
  
Cost of goods sold:  
Products 76,367 76,669  65,419 118,221 141,786 194,890 
Services 19,190 19,047  18,062 30,308 37,252 49,355 
              
Total cost of goods sold 95,557 95,716  83,481 148,529 179,038 244,245 
              
Gross profit 71,843 80,160  60,720 104,942 132,563 185,102 
              
Operating expenses:  
Research and development 46,700 50,033  49,482 71,142 96,182 121,175 
Selling and marketing 33,819 34,237  33,295 45,328 67,114 79,565 
General and administrative 11,585 12,763  12,615 21,503 24,200 34,266 
Acquisition and integration costs  27,031   39,221  66,252 
Amortization of intangible assets 6,404 5,981  6,224 17,121 12,628 23,102 
Restructuring costs 76  (21) 6,399 1,849 6,475 1,828 
Goodwill impairment 455,673  455,673  
              
Total operating expenses 98,584 130,024  563,688 196,164 662,272 326,188 
              
Loss from operations  (26,741)  (49,864)  (502,968)  (91,222)  (529,709)  (141,086)
Interest and other income (loss), net 4,660  (773) 3,508 3,748 8,168 2,975 
Interest expense  (1,844)  (1,828)  (1,852)  (4,113)  (3,696)  (5,941)
Loss on cost method investments  (565)    (2,570)   (3,135)  
              
Loss before income taxes  (24,490)  (52,465)  (503,882)  (91,587)  (528,372)  (144,052)
Provision for income taxes 341 868 
Benefit for income taxes  (672)  (1,578)  (331)  (710)
              
Net loss $(24,831) $(53,333) $(503,210) $(90,009) $(528,041) $(143,342)
              
Basic net loss per common share $(0.27) $(0.58) $(5.53) $(0.97) $(5.82) $(1.55)
              
Diluted net loss per potential common share $(0.27) $(0.58) $(5.53) $(0.97) $(5.82) $(1.55)
              
Weighted average basic common shares outstanding 90,620 92,321  90,932 92,614 90,777 92,590 
              
Weighted average dilutive potential common shares outstanding 90,620 92,321  90,932 92,614 90,777 92,590 
              
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

3


CIENA CORPORATION
CIENA CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share data)
(unaudited)
                
 October 31, January 31,  October 31, April 30, 
 2009 2010  2009 2010 
ASSETS  
 
Current assets:  
Cash and cash equivalents $485,705 $573,180  $485,705 $584,229 
Short-term investments 563,183 428,409  563,183 29,537 
Accounts receivable, net 118,251 105,624  118,251 178,959 
Inventories 88,086 95,431  88,086 233,405 
Prepaid expenses and other 50,537 75,423  50,537 95,246 
          
Total current assets 1,305,762 1,278,067  1,305,762 1,121,376 
Long-term investments 8,031 8,048  8,031  
Equipment, furniture and fixtures, net 61,868 64,351  61,868 110,885 
Goodwill  39,991 
Other intangible assets, net 60,820 53,433  60,820 517,185 
Other long-term assets 67,902 77,208  67,902 117,524 
     
      
Total assets $1,504,383 $1,481,107  $1,504,383 $1,906,961 
          
  
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY  
  
Current liabilities:  
Accounts payable $53,104 $76,211  $53,104 $105,138 
Accrued liabilities 103,349 97,560  103,349 185,808 
Restructuring liabilities 1,811 1,566  1,811 3,270 
Income tax payable  1,306   1,306 
Deferred revenue 40,565 43,722  40,565 56,713 
          
Total current liabilities 198,829 220,365  198,829 352,235 
Long-term deferred revenue 35,368 37,177  35,368 34,978 
Long-term restructuring liabilities 7,794 7,184  7,794 6,537 
Other long-term obligations 8,554 8,330  8,554 9,413 
Convertible notes payable 798,000 798,000  798,000 1,174,665 
          
Total liabilities 1,048,545 1,071,056  1,048,545 1,577,828 
          
Commitments and contingencies  
Stockholders’ equity:  
Preferred stock – par value $0.01; 20,000,000 shares authorized; zero shares issued and outstanding   
Common stock – par value $0.01; 290,000,000 shares authorized; 92,038,360 and 92,566,178 shares issued and outstanding 920 926 
Preferred stock — par value $0.01; 20,000,000 shares authorized; zero shares issued and outstanding   
Common stock — par value $0.01; 290,000,000 shares authorized; 92,038,360 and 93,079,180 shares issued and outstanding 920 931 
Additional paid-in capital 5,665,028 5,673,387  5,665,028 5,682,647 
Accumulated other comprehensive income 1,223 404  1,223 230 
Accumulated deficit  (5,211,333)  (5,264,666)  (5,211,333)  (5,354,675)
          
Total stockholders’ equity 455,838 410,051  455,838 329,133 
          
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $1,504,383 $1,481,107  $1,504,383 $1,906,961 
          
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

4


CIENA CORPORATION
CIENA CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
                
 Three Months Ended January 31,  Six Months Ended April 30, 
 2009 2010  2009 2010 
Cash flows from operating activities:  
Net loss $(24,831) $(53,333) $(528,041) $(143,342)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:  
Amortization of (discount) premium on marketable securities  (863) 365   (904) 575 
Loss on cost method investments 565   3,135  
Gain on embedded redemption feature   (6,640)
Depreciation of equipment, furniture and fixtures, and amortization of leasehold improvements 5,097 5,871  10,830 13,543 
Impairment of goodwill 455,673  
Share-based compensation costs 8,494 8,282  17,591 16,799 
Amortization of intangible assets 8,055 7,631  15,930 33,618 
Provision for inventory excess and obsolescence 6,548 950  8,809 7,100 
Provision for warranty 2,541 3,060  9,235 8,847 
Other 271 471  1,171 1,037 
Changes in assets and liabilities: 
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisition: 
Accounts receivable 7,922 12,627  21,728  (53,255)
Inventories  (4,379)  (8,295)  (6,626)  (38,250)
Prepaid expenses and other  (147) 9,204  6,253  4,944 
Accounts payable, accruals and other obligations  (8,781) 11,366   (16,371) 83,525 
Income taxes payable 1,162 1,306   1,306 
Deferred revenue  (2,533) 4,966  3,572  (3,043)
          
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  (879) 4,471  1,985  (73,236)
          
Cash flows from investing activities:  
Payments for equipment, furniture, fixtures and intellectual property  (6,140)  (7,009)  (12,632)  (18,275)
Restricted cash  (84)  (5,520)  (109)  (9,046)
Purchase of available for sale securities  (195,538)  (63,591)  (719,165)  (63,591)
Proceeds from maturities of available for sale securities 186,853 179,739  239,072 424,841 
Proceeds from sales of available for sale securities  18,000  523,137 179,380 
Deposit on pending business acquisition   (38,450)
Acquisition of business   (711,932)
          
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  (14,909) 83,169  30,303  (198,623)
          
Cash flows from financing activities:  
Proceeds from issuance of 4.0% convertible notes payable, net  369,660 
Proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants 58 83  539 831 
          
Net cash provided by financing activities 58 83  539 370,491 
          
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents 46  (248)  (15)  (108)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  (15,730) 87,723 
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 32,827 98,632 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 550,669 485,705  550,669 485,705 
          
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $534,985 $573,180  $583,481 $584,229 
          
  
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
  
Cash paid (refunded) during the period for:  
Interest $2,188 $2,560  $2,560 $2,560 
Income taxes, net $(695) $736  $(281) $1,294 
Non-cash investing and financing activities
  
Purchase of equipment in accounts payable $641 $3,294  $605 $649 
Debt issuance costs in accrued liabilities $ $5,021 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

5


CIENA CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
(1) INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
     The interim financial statements included herein for Ciena Corporation (“Ciena”) have been prepared by Ciena, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the opinion of management, financial statements included in this report reflect all normal recurring adjustments that Ciena considers necessary for the fair statement of the results of operations for the interim periods covered and of the financial position of Ciena at the date of the interim balance sheets. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The October 31, 2009 condensed consolidated balance sheet was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. However, Ciena believes that the disclosures are adequate to understand the information presented. The operating results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the entire year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with Ciena’s audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in Ciena’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2009.
     On March 19, 2010, Ciena completed its acquisition of substantially all of the optical networking and Carrier Ethernet assets of Nortel’s Metro Ethernet Networks (“MEN Business”). Ciena’s results of operations for the second quarter and six-month period ended April 30, 2010 reflect the operations of the MEN Business beginning on the March 19, 2010 acquisition date. See Note 3 below.
Ciena has a 52 or 53 week fiscal year, which ends on the Saturday nearest to the last day of October of each year. For purposes of financial statement presentation, each fiscal year is described as having ended on October 31, and each fiscal quarter is described as having ended on January 31, April 30 and July 31 of each fiscal year.
     During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, Ciena recorded an adjustment to reduce its warranty liability and cost of goods sold by $3.3 million, to correct an overstatement of warranty expenses related to prior periods. The adjustment related to an error in the methodology of computing the annual failure rate used to calculate the warranty accrual. There was no tax impact as a result of this adjustment. Ciena believes this adjustment is not material to its financial statements for prior annual or interim periods, the first quartersix months of fiscal 2010 or the expected annual results for 2010.
     Ciena performed an evaluation of events that have occurred subsequent to the end of its fiscal period through the date that the condensed consolidated financial statements were issued. As of the date of the filing of this Form 10-Q, there have been no subsequent events that occurred during such period that would require disclosure in this Form 10-Q or would be required to be recognized in the condensed consolidated financial statements.2010.
(2) SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Use of Estimates
     The preparation of the financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Estimates are used for bad debts, valuation of inventories and investments, recoverability of intangible assets, other long-lived assets and goodwill, income taxes, warranty obligations, restructuring liabilities, derivatives and contingencies and litigation. Ciena bases its estimates on historical experience and assumptions that it believes are reasonable. Actual results may differ materially from management’s estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
     Ciena considers all highly liquid investments purchased with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Restricted cash collateralizing letters of credits are included in other current assets and other long-term assets depending upon the duration of the restriction.
Investments
     Ciena’s investments are principally in marketable debt securities. These investments are classified as available-for-sale and are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income. Ciena recognizes losses when it determines that declines in the fair value of its investments, below their cost basis, are other-than-temporary. In determining whether a decline in fair value is other-than-temporary, Ciena considers various factors including market price (when available), investment ratings, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the investee, the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than Ciena’s cost basis, and its intent and ability to hold the investment until maturity or for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value. Ciena considers all marketable debt securities that it expects to convert to cash within one year or less to be short-term investments. All others are considered long-term investments.

6


are considered long-term investments.
Inventories
     Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost computed using standard cost, which approximates actual cost, on a first-in, first-out basis. Ciena records a provision for excess and obsolete inventory when an impairment has been identified.
Equipment, Furniture and Fixtures
     Equipment, furniture and fixtures are recorded at cost. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method over useful lives of two years to five years for equipment, furniture and fixtures and the shorter of useful life or lease term for leasehold improvements. Upon a triggering event or changes in circumstances, a review of the fair valuecarrying amount of our equipment, furniture and fixtures is performed and an impairment loss is recognized only if the carrying amount of the asset or asset group is determined to be not be recoverable and exceeds its fair value. An impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset or asset group exceeds its fair value.
     Qualifying internal use software and website development costs incurred during the application development stage that consist primarily of outside services and purchased software license costs, are capitalized and amortized straight-line over the estimated useful life.
Segment Reporting
     Effective upon the March 19, 2010 completion of the acquisition of the MEN Business, Ciena reorganized its internal organizational structure and the management of its business. Ciena’s chief operating decision maker, its chief executive officer, evaluates performance and allocates resources based on multiple factors, including segment profit (loss) information for the following product categories: (i) Packet-Optical Transport; (ii) Packet-Optical Switching; (iii) Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery; and (iv) Software and Services. Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise: that engage in business activities which may earn revenue and incur expense; for which discrete financial information is available; and for which such information is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker for purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance. Ciena considers the four product categories above to be its operating segments for reporting purposes. See Notes 3 and 19.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
     Ciena has recorded goodwill and intangible assets as a result of several acquisitions. All of the goodwill on Ciena’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of April 30, 2010 is a result of the acquisition of the MEN Business. Goodwill is assigned to the reporting units that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination. Ciena has determined that its operating segments and reporting units for goodwill assignment are the same. This determination is based on the fact that components below Ciena’s operating segment level, such as individual product or service offerings, do not constitute a reporting unit because they do not constitute a business for which discrete financial information is available.
     Ciena tests the reporting unit’s goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, which Ciena has determined to be the last business day of its fiscal September each year. Testing is required between annual tests if events occur or circumstances change that would, more likely than not, reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying value. Prior to the reorganization of Ciena’s operations described above, Ciena operates its business and teststested its goodwill for impairment as a single reporting unit.
     Ciena has recorded finite-lived and indefinite lived intangible assets as a result of several acquisitions. Finite-lived intangible assets are carried at cost less accumulated amortization. Amortization is computed using the straight-line method over the expected economic lives of the respective assets, generally threefrom nine months to seven years, which approximates the use of intangible assets. Upon a triggering event or changes in circumstances, a review of the fair value of our finite-lived intangible assets is performed. Impairments of finite-lived intangible assets are recognized only if the carrying amount of the asset or asset group is determined to not be recoverable and exceeds its fair value. Upon a triggering event or changes in circumstances, a review of the fair value of our finite-lived intangible assets is performed and an impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset or asset group exceeds its fair value.
     Indefinite-lived intangible assets are carried at cost. Ciena’s other indefinite-lived intangible assets reflect in-process research and development assets acquired from the MEN Business. In-process research and development assets will be impaired, if abandoned, or amortized in future periods, depending upon the ability of Ciena to use the research and development in future periods. Future expenditures to complete

7


the in-process research and development projects will be expensed as incurred.
Minority Equity Investments
     Ciena has certain minority equity investments in privately held technology companies that are classified as other assets. These investments are carried at cost because Ciena owns less than 20% of the voting equity and does not have the ability to exercise significant influence over these companies. These investments involve a high degree of risk as the markets for the technologies or products manufactured by these companies are usually early stage at the time of Ciena’s investment and such markets may never be significant. Ciena could lose its entire investment in some or all of these companies. Ciena monitors these investments for impairment and makes appropriate reductions in carrying values when necessary.
Concentrations
     Substantially all of Ciena’s cash and cash equivalents and short-term and long-term investments in marketable debt securities are maintained at three major U.S. financial institutions. The majority of Ciena’s cash equivalents consist of money market funds. Deposits held with banks may exceed the amount of insurance provided on such deposits. Generally, these deposits may be redeemed upon demand and, therefore, management believes that they bear minimal risk.
     Historically, a large percentage of Ciena’s revenue has been the result of sales to a small number of communications service providers. Consolidation among Ciena’s customers has increased this concentration. Consequently, Ciena’s accounts receivable are concentrated among these customers. See Notes 78 and 1719 below.
     Additionally, Ciena’s access to certain materials or components is dependent upon sole or limited source suppliers. The inability of any supplier to fulfill Ciena’s supply requirements could affect future results. Ciena relies on a small number of contract manufacturers principally in China and Thailand, to perform the majority of the manufacturing for its products. If Ciena cannot effectively manage these manufacturers and forecast future demand, or if they fail to deliver products or components on time, Ciena’s business and results of operations may suffer.

7


Revenue Recognition
     Ciena recognizes revenue when all of the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; the price to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and collectibility is reasonably assured. Customer purchase agreements and customer purchase orders are generally used to determine the existence of an arrangement. Shipping documents and evidence of customer acceptance, when applicable, are used to verify delivery. Ciena assesses whether the price is fixed or determinable based on the payment terms associated with the transaction and whether the sales price is subject to refund or adjustment. Ciena assesses collectibility based primarily on the creditworthiness of the customer as determined by credit checks and analysis, as well as the customer’s payment history. In instances where final acceptance of the product, system, or solution is specified by the customer, revenue is deferred until all acceptance criteria have been met. Revenue for maintenance services is generally deferred and recognized ratably over the period during which the services are to be performed.
     Ciena applies the percentage of completion method to long-term arrangements where it is required to undertake significant production, customizations or modification, and reasonable and reliable estimates of revenue and cost are available. Utilizing the percentage of completion method, Ciena recognizes revenue based on the ratio of actual costs incurred to date to total estimated costs expected to be incurred. In instances that do not meet the percentage of completion method criteria, recognition of revenue is deferred until there are no uncertainties regarding customer acceptance.
     Some of Ciena’s communications networking equipment is integrated with software that is essential to the functionality of the equipment. Software revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is probable. In instances where final acceptance of the product is specified by the customer, revenue is deferred until all acceptance criteria have been met.there are no uncertainties regarding customer acceptance.
     Arrangements with customers may include multiple deliverables, including any combination of equipment, services and software. If multiple element arrangements include software or software-related elements that are essential to the equipment, Ciena allocates the arrangement fee to be allocated to those separate units of accounting. Multiple element arrangements that include software are separated into more than one unit of accounting if the functionality of the delivered element(s) is not dependent on the undelivered element(s), there is vendor-specific objective evidence of the fair value of the undelivered element(s), and general revenue recognition criteria related to the delivered element(s) have been met. The amount of product and services revenue recognized is affected by Ciena’s judgments as to whether an arrangement includes multiple elements and, if so, whether vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value exists. Changes to the elements in

8


an arrangement and Ciena’s ability to establish vendor-specific objective evidence for those elements could affect the timing of revenue recognition. For all other deliverables, Ciena separates the elements into more than one unit of accounting if the delivered element(s) have value to the customer on a stand-alone basis, objective and reliable evidence of fair value exists for the undelivered element(s), and delivery of the undelivered element(s) is probable and substantially in Ciena’s control. Revenue is allocated to each unit of accounting based on the relative fair value of each accounting unit or using the residual method if objective evidence of fair value does not exist for the delivered element(s). The revenue recognition criteria described above are applied to each separate unit of accounting. If these criteria are not met, revenue is deferred until the criteria are met or the last element has been delivered.
Warranty Accruals
     Ciena provides for the estimated costs to fulfill customer warranty obligations upon the recognition of the related revenue. Estimated warranty costs include estimates for material costs, technical support labor costs and associated overhead. The warranty liability is included in cost of goods sold and determined based upon actual warranty cost experience, estimates of component failure rates and management’s industry experience. Ciena’s sales contracts do not permit the right of return of product by the customer after the product has been accepted.
Accounts Receivable, Net
     Ciena’s allowance for doubtful accounts is based on its assessment, on a specific identification basis, of the collectibility of customer accounts. Ciena performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and generally has not required collateral or other forms of security from its customers. In determining the appropriate balance for Ciena’s allowance for doubtful accounts, management considers each individual customer account receivable in order to determine collectibility. In doing so, management considers creditworthiness, payment history, account activity and communication with such customer. If a customer’s financial condition changes, Ciena may be required to record an allowance for doubtful accounts, which would negatively affect its results of operations.

8


Research and Development
     Ciena charges all research and development costs to expense as incurred. Types of expense incurred in research and development include employee compensation, prototype, consulting, depreciation, facility costs and information technologies.
Advertising Costs
     Ciena expenses all advertising costs as incurred.
Legal Costs
     Ciena expenses legal costs associated with litigation defense as incurred.
Share-Based Compensation Expense
     Ciena measures and recognizes compensation expense for share-based awards based on estimated fair values on the date of grant. Ciena estimates the fair value of each option-based award on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. This model is affected by Ciena’s stock price as well as estimates regarding a number of variables including expected stock price volatility over the expected term of the award and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors. Ciena estimates the fair value of each share-based award based on the fair value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. In each case, Ciena only recognizes expense to its consolidated statement of operations for those options or shares that are expected ultimately to vest. Ciena uses two attribution methods to record expense, the straight-line method for grants with service-based vesting and the graded-vesting method, which considers each performance period or tranche separately, for all other awards. See Note 1517 below.
Income Taxes
     Ciena accounts for income taxes using an asset and liability approach that recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences attributable to differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and their respective tax bases, and for operating loss and tax credit carry forwards.carryforwards. In estimating future tax consequences, Ciena considers all expected future events other than the enactment of changes in tax laws or rates.

9


Valuation allowances are provided, if, based upon the weight of the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
     Ciena adopted the accounting guidance on uncertainty related to income tax positions at the beginning of fiscal 2008. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits increased by $0.1$0.7 million during the first quartersix months of fiscal 2010 to $7.5$8.1 million, which includes $1.2$1.3 million of interest and some minor penalties. Ciena classified interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as a component of income tax expense. All of the uncertain tax positions, if recognized, would decrease the effective income tax rate.
     On March 19, 2010, as a result of the acquisition of the MEN Business, Ciena recorded a liability and an indemnification asset of $2.6 million related to the uncertain income tax positions of the MEN Business. During the period ending April 30, 2010 subsequent to the acquisition, this acquired liability and associated indemnification asset were reduced by $2.0 million due to a lapse in applicable statute of limitations.
     In the ordinary course of business, transactions occur for which the ultimate outcome may be uncertain. In addition, tax authorities periodically audit Ciena’s income tax returns. These audits examine significant tax filing positions, including the timing and amounts of deductions and the allocation of income tax expenses among tax jurisdictions. Ciena’s major tax jurisdictions include the United States, United Kingdom, Canada and India, with open tax years beginning with fiscal years 2006, 2004, 2005 and 2007, respectively. However, limited adjustments can be made to Federal tax returns in earlier years in order to reduce net operating loss carryforwards.
     Ciena has not provided U.S. deferred income taxes on the cumulative unremitted earnings of its non-U.S. affiliates as it plans to permanently reinvest cumulative unremitted foreign earnings outside the U.S. and it is not practicable to determine the unrecognized deferred income taxes. These cumulative unremitted foreign earnings relate to ongoing operations in foreign jurisdictions and are required to fund foreign operations, capital expenditures, and any expansion requirements.
     Ciena recognizes windfall tax benefits associated with the exercise of stock options or release of restricted stock units directly to stockholders’ equity only when realized. A windfall tax benefit occurs when the actual tax benefit realized by Ciena upon an employee’s disposition of a share-based award exceeds the deferred tax asset, if any, associated with the award that Ciena had recorded. When assessing whether a tax benefit relating to share-based compensation has been realized, Ciena follows the tax law “with-and-without” method. Under the with-and-without method, the windfall is considered realized and recognized for financial statement purposes only when an incremental benefit is provided after considering all other tax benefits including Ciena’s net operating losses. The with-and-without method results in the windfall from share-based compensation awards always being effectively the last tax benefit to be considered. Consequently, the windfall attributable to share-based compensation will not be considered realized in instances where Ciena’s net operating loss carryover (that is unrelated to windfalls) is sufficient to offset the current year’s taxable income before considering the effects of current-year windfalls.

9


Loss Contingencies
     Ciena is subject to the possibility of various losses arising in the ordinary course of business. These may relate to disputes, litigation and other legal actions. Ciena considers the likelihood of loss or the incurrence of a liability, as well as Ciena’s ability to reasonably estimate the amount of loss, in determining loss contingencies. An estimated loss contingency is accrued when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. Ciena regularly evaluates current information available to it to determine whether any accruals should be adjusted and whether new accruals are required.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
     The carrying value of Ciena’s cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities, approximates fair market value due to the relatively short period of time to maturity. The fair value of investments in marketable debt securities is determined using quoted market prices for those securities or similar financial instruments. For information related to the fair value of Ciena’s convertible notes, see Note 67 below.
     Fair value for the measurement of financial assets and liabilities is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. Ciena utilizes a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs for fair value measurement. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels as follows:

10


  Level 1 inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
 
  Level 2 inputs are quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in less active markets or model-derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument;
 
  Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs based on Ciena’s assumptions used to measure assets and liabilities at fair value.
     By distinguishing between inputs that are observable in the marketplace, and therefore more objective, and those that are unobservable and therefore more subjective, the hierarchy is designed to indicate the relative reliability of the fair value measurements. A financial asset or liability’s classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Restructuring
     From time to time, Ciena has previously takentakes actions to align its workforce, facilities and operating costs with perceived market opportunities and business conditions. Ciena implements these restructuring plans and incurs the associated liability concurrently. Generally accepted accounting principles require that a liability for the cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized in the period in which the liability is incurred, except for one-time employee termination benefits related to a service period of more than 60 days, which are accrued over the service period. See Note 5 below.
Foreign Currency
     Some of Ciena’s foreign branch offices and subsidiaries use the U.S. dollar as their functional currency, because Ciena, as the U.S. parent entity, exclusively funds the operations of these branch offices and subsidiaries with U.S. dollars. For those subsidiaries using the local currency as their functional currency, assets and liabilities are translated at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date, and the statement of operations is translated at a monthly average rate. Resulting translation adjustments are recorded directly to a separate component of stockholders’ equity. Where the U.S. dollar is the functional currency of foreign branch offices or subsidiaries, re-measurement adjustments are recorded in other income. The net gain (loss) on foreign currency re-measurement and exchange rate changes is immaterial for separate financial statement presentation.

10


Derivatives
     Ciena’s 4% convertible senior notes include a redemption feature that is accounted for as a separate embedded derivative. The embedded redemption feature is recorded at fair value on a recurring basis and these changes are included in interest and other income (expense), net on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.
     Occasionally, Ciena uses foreign currency forward contracts to hedge certain forecasted foreign currency transactions relating to operating expenses. These derivatives, designated as cash flow hedges, have maturities of less than one year and permit net settlement.
     At the inception of the cash flow hedge and on an ongoing basis, Ciena assesses the hedging relationship to determine its effectiveness in offsetting changes in cash flows attributable to the hedged risk during the hedge period. The effective portion of the hedging instrument’s net gain or loss is initially reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), and upon occurrence of the forecasted transaction, is subsequently reclassified into the operating expense line item to which the hedged transaction relates. Any net gain or loss associated with the ineffectiveness of the hedging instrument is reported in interest and other income, net. See Note 1314 below.
Computation of Basic Net Income (Loss) per Common Share and Diluted Net Income (Loss) per Dilutive Potential Common Share
     Ciena calculates basic earnings per share (EPS) by dividing earnings attributable to common stock by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS includes the potential dilution of common stock equivalent shares that would occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock. Ciena uses a dual presentation of basic and diluted EPS on the face of its income statement. A reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used for the basic and diluted EPS computations is set forth in Note 14.16.
Software Development Costs

11


     Generally accepted accounting principles require the capitalization of certain software development costs incurred subsequent to the date technological feasibility is established and prior to the date the product is generally available for sale. The capitalized cost is then amortized straight-line over the estimated life of the product. Ciena defines technological feasibility as being attained at the time a working model is completed. To date, the period between Ciena achieving technological feasibility and the general availability of such software has been short, and software development costs qualifying for capitalization have been insignificant. Accordingly, Ciena has not capitalized any software development costs.
Segment Reporting
     Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or decision making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. Ciena’s chief operating decision maker is its chief executive officer, who reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis for purposes of allocating resources and evaluating financial performance. Ciena has one business activity, and there are no segment managers who are held accountable for operations, operating results and plans for levels or components below the consolidated unit level. Accordingly, Ciena considers its business to be in a single reportable segment.
Newly Issued Accounting Standards
     In January 2010, the FASB amended the accounting standards for fair value measurement and disclosures. The amended guidance requires disclosures regarding the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and the reasons for the transfers. It also requires separate presentation of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements of Level 3 fair value measurements. The guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, with the exception of the additional Level 3 disclosures which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010. Ciena believes this new guidance will not have a material impact on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
     In October 2009, the FASB amended the accounting standards for revenue recognition with multiple deliverables. The amended guidance allows the use of management’s best estimate of selling price for individual elements of an arrangement when vendor specificvendor-specific objective evidence or third-party evidence is unavailable. Additionally, it eliminates the residual method of revenue recognition in accounting for multiple deliverable arrangements. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010 and early adoption is permitted. Ciena is currently evaluating the impact this new guidance could have on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
     In October 2009, the FASB amended the accounting standards for revenue arrangements with software elements. The amended guidance modifies the scope of the software revenue recognition guidance to exclude tangible products that contain both software and non-software components that function together to deliver the product’s essential functionality. The pronouncement is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010 and early adoption is permitted. This guidance must be adopted in the same period an entity adopts the amended revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables guidance described above. Ciena is currently evaluating the impact this new guidance could have on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

11


(3) BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
Pending Acquisition of Nortel Metro Ethernet Networks (“MEN”) AssetsMEN Business
     On November 23, 2009March 19, 2010, Ciena announcedcompleted its acquisition of the MEN Business. Ciena believes that it hadthis transaction strengthens its position as a leader in next-generation, converged optical Ethernet networking and will accelerate the execution of its corporate and research and development strategies. Ciena believes that the additional geographic reach, expanded customer relationships, and broader portfolio of complementary network solutions derived from the acquisition will augment and accelerate the growth of its business.
     The $773.8 million aggregate purchase price for the acquisition consisted entirely of cash. The purchase price is subject to adjustment based upon the amount of net working capital transferred to Ciena at closing. The purchase price was decreased at closing by approximately $62.0 million based on the estimated working capital delivered at closing. As of the date of this report, Ciena estimates that the adjustment will further decrease the aggregate purchase price by up to an additional $18.7 million, subject to finalization between the parties. This estimated further adjustment has been selected as the successful bidderreflected in the auction of substantially all offinancial statements accordingly. Prior to closing, Ciena elected to replace the optical networking and carrier Ethernet assets of Nortel’s MEN business. In accordance with the definitive purchase agreements, as amended, Ciena has agreed to pay $530 million in cash and issue $239$239.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 6% Senior Convertibleconvertible notes due 2017 (“Notes”) for a total consideration of $769 million for the assets. Ciena expects this pending transaction to close in the first calendar quarter of 2010.
     The Notesthat were to be issued at closing will bear interest at the rate of 6.0% per annum, payable semi-annually, commencing six months after the date of issuance. The interest rate is subject to an upward adjustment, up to a maximum of 8% per annum, in the event that the volume weighted average price of Ciena’s common stock price over the measurement period immediately preceding closing is less than $13.17 per share. The Notes mature on June 15, 2017.
     The terms of the Notes to be issued will be substantially similar to Ciena’s outstanding series of 0.875% senior convertible notes due 2017. The Notes will be senior unsecured obligations of Ciena and will rank equally with all of Ciena’s other senior unsecured debt and senior to all of Ciena’s future subordinated debt. The Notes will be structurally subordinated to all present and future debt and other obligations of Ciena’s subsidiaries and will be effectively subordinated to all of Ciena’s present and future secured debt to the extent of the value of the collateral securing such debt.
     Following issuance, the Notes may be converted prior to maturity (unless earlier redeemed by Ciena) at the option of the holder into shares of Ciena common stock at the initial conversion rate of 60.7441 shares of Ciena common stock per $1,000 in principal amount of Notes, which is equal to an initial conversion price of approximately $16.4625 per share, subject to customary adjustments. Assuming the full conversionNortel as part of the aggregate principal amount, the Notes are convertible into approximately 14.5 million shares of Ciena common stock, subject to customary adjustments.
     Ciena is required to prepare and file a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 for purposes of registering the resale of the Notes, and the common stock underlying the Notes, by the later of thirty days following the closing or sixty days following Ciena’s receipt from Nortel of certain financial statements required in connection with the filing and effectiveness of the registration statement. Ciena’s failure to timely file the registration statement, and certain withdrawals or suspensions thereof, would result in liquidated damages of 0.25% to 0.50% per annum of the aggregate principal amount of the Notes, depending upon the duration of the registration default. Ciena has also granted certain demand registration rights requiring it to register and certain piggyback registration rights that afford the holders an opportunity to participate in certain registered offerings by Ciena.
     Prior to closing, Ciena may elect to replace some or all of the Notespurchase price with cash equalequivalent to 102% of the face amount of suchthe notes replaced, or $243.8 million. Ciena completed a private placement of 4.0% Convertible Senior Notes replaced, provided that the volume weighted average price of Ciena’s common stock is less than $17.00 per share over the ten trading days prior to the date Ciena makes such election, or, if such volume weighted average price of Ciena’s common stock is equal to or greater than $17.00 per share, with cashdue March 15, 2015 in theaggregate principal amount equalof $375.0 million to the greater of 105% of the face amount of the Notes to be replaced or 95% of the fair value of the Notes to be replaced as of the date of the election. In the event that it completes any capital raising transaction prior to the closing, Ciena will be required to use the net proceeds of the capital raising transaction to make thefund this election described above and if such transaction involves the issuance of convertible securities, the price used to determine the value of Ciena’s common stock for the purposes of calculating the cost of the Notes replaced or redeemed will be the closing price per share prior to the time when such offering is priced, instead of the volume weighted average price as described in the preceding sentence.
     After the closing, but prior to the effectiveness of the shelf registration statement above, Ciena has the right to redeem the Notes if they have been issued, with cash in the principal amount equal to the greater of 105% of the face amount of the Notes or 95% of the fair value of the Notes and any accrued and unpaid interest since the date of issue. Ciena must offer to use the net proceeds of any capital raising transaction completed during the above described period to redeem the Notes at the applicable redemption price above.
     If Ciena undergoes a fundamental change, as defined in the proposed indenture and subject to certain exceptions, the holders have the right to require Ciena to repurchase for cash any or all of their Notes at a purchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the repurchase date. If a holder elects to convert the Notes in connection with a qualified fundamental change, Ciena will in certain circumstances increase the conversion rate by a specified number of additional shares, depending upon the price paid per share of Ciena common stock in such fundamental change transaction.

12


     On November 25, 2009, Ciena deposited in escrow approximately $38.5 million in cash pending the closing of the transaction. Upon closing, Ciena will receive a credit forreduce the amount of the deposit againstcash on hand required to fund the aggregate cash consideration to be paid to the sellers. The deposit is subject to forfeiture in the event that all of the conditions to closing are satisfied and Ciena does not consummate the transaction and the sellers terminate the asset purchase agreement, pertaining principally to the North American assets, as a result of Ciena’s material breach of its obligations under that agreement. If this agreement is terminated for any other reason, the deposit will be returned to Ciena.price. See Note 15 below.
     Given the structure of the transaction as an asset carve-out from Nortel, Ciena expects that the transaction will result in a costly and complex integration with a number of operational risks. Ciena expects to incur acquisition and integration costs of approximately $180 million, with the majority of these costs to be incurred in the first 12 months following the completion of the transaction.fiscal 2010. This estimate principally reflects expensecosts associated with equipment and information technology, costs, transaction expense, severance expense and consulting and third party service fees associated with integration. This amount does not give effectIn addition to any expensethese integration costs, Ciena has incurred inventory obsolescence charges and may incur additional expenses related to, among other things, facilities restructuring or inventory obsolescence charges.restructuring. As a result, the integration expense related to the acquisition that Ciena incurs and recognizes for financial statement purposes couldwill be significantly higher.higher than the estimated acquisition and integration costs above. As of January 31,April 30, 2010, Ciena has incurred $27.0$66.3 million in transaction, consulting and third party service fees, $1.9 million in severance expense, and $2.3an additional $2.4 million, primarily related to purchases of capitalized information technology equipment. In addition to thesethe estimated integration costs above, Ciena also expects to incur significant transition services expense, andexpense. Ciena will relyis currently relying upon an affiliate of Nortel to perform certain critical operational and business support functions during an interim integration period. Ciena can utilize certain of these support services for a period of up to 24 months following closingthe acquisition of the MEN Business (12 months in EMEA). The cost of these transition services is estimated to be approximately $94 million annually. The actual expense will depend upon the scope of the services that Ciena utilizes and the time within which Ciena is able

12


to complete the planned transfer of these services to internal resources or other third party providers.
     During fiscal 2010, Ciena adopted the new FASB guidance on business combinations. The acquisition of the MEN Business has been accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting which requires the total purchase price to be allocated to the acquired assets and assumed liabilities based on their estimated fair values. The fair values assigned to the acquired assets and assumed liabilities are based on valuations using management’s best estimates and assumptions. The allocation of the purchase price as reflected in these consolidated financial statements is based on the best information available to management at the time these consolidated financial statements were issued and is preliminary pending the completion of the valuation analysis of selected assets and liabilities and the final agreement of the purchase price adjustment described above. During the measurement period (which is not to exceed one year from the acquisition date), Ciena is required to retrospectively adjust the provisional assets or liabilities if new information is obtained about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date that, if known, would have resulted in the recognition of those assets or liabilities as of that date. The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase price for the MEN Business based on the estimated fair value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities (in thousands):
     
  Amount 
Unbilled receivables $7,454 
Inventories  114,169 
Prepaid expenses and other  32,517 
Other long-term assets  21,821 
Equipment, furniture and fixtures  45,351 
Developed technology  218,774 
In-process research and development  11,000 
Customer relationships, outstanding purchase orders and contracts  257,964 
Trade name  2,000 
Goodwill  39,991 
Deferred revenue  (18,801)
Accrued liabilities  (36,349)
Other long-term obligations  (2,644)
    
Total purchase price allocation $693,247 
    
     Any change in the estimated fair value of the net assets during the measurement period will change the amount of the purchase price allocable to goodwill. Any subsequent change to the purchase price allocation that is material to Ciena’s consolidated financial results will be adjusted retroactively.
     Unbilled receivables represent unbilled claims for which Ciena will invoice customers upon its completion of the acquired projects.
     Under the acquisition method of accounting, Ciena revalued the acquired finished goods inventory to fair value, which was determined to be most appropriately recognized as the estimated selling price less the sum of (a) costs of disposal, and (b) a reasonable profit allowance for Ciena’s selling effort. This revaluation resulted in an increase in inventory carrying value of approximately $40.7 million for marketable inventory offset by a decrease of $4.8 million for unmarketable inventory.
     Prepaid expenses and other include product demonstration units used to support research and development projects and indemnification assets related to uncertain tax contingencies acquired and recorded as part of other long-term obligations. Other long-term assets represent spares used to support customer maintenance commitments.
     Developed technology represents purchased technology which has reached technological feasibility and for which development had been completed as of the date of the acquisition. Developed technology will be amortized on a straight line basis over its estimated useful lives of two to seven years.
     In-process research and development represents development projects that had not reached technological feasibility at the time of the acquisition. In-process research and development assets will be impaired, if abandoned, or amortized in future periods, depending upon the ability of Ciena to use the research and development in future periods. Future expenditures to complete the in-process research and development projects will be expensed as incurred.

13


     Customer relationships, outstanding purchase orders and contracts represent agreements with existing customers of the MEN Business. These intangible assets are expected to have estimated useful lives of nine months to seven years, with the exception of $12.0 million related to a contract asset for acquired in-process projects which will be billed in full by Ciena and recognized as a reduction in revenue within the next year. Trade name represents acquired product trade names which are expected to have a useful life of nine months.
     Goodwill represents the purchase price in excess of the amounts assigned to acquired tangible or intangible assets and assumed liabilities. Amounts allocated to goodwill are tax deductible in all relevant jurisdictions. The goodwill is attributable to the assigned workforce of the MEN Business and the synergies expected to arise as a result of the acquisition.
     Deferred revenue represents obligations assumed by Ciena to provide maintenance support services for which payment for such services was already made to Nortel.
     Accrued liabilities represent assumed warranty obligations, other customer contract obligations, and certain employee benefit plans. Other long-term obligations represent uncertain tax contingencies.
     The following unaudited pro forma financial information summarizes the results of operations for the periods indicated as if Ciena’s acquisition of the MEN Business had been completed as of the beginning of each of the periods presented. Revenue specific to the MEN Business since the March 19,2010 acquisition date was $53.5 million. As Ciena has begun to integrate the combined operations, eliminating overlapping processes and expenses and integrating its products and sales efforts with those of the acquired MEN Business, it is impractical to determine the earnings specific to the MEN Business since the acquisition date.
     These pro forma amounts (in thousands) do not purport to be indicative of the results that would have actually been obtained if the acquisition occurred as of the beginning of the periods presented or that may be obtained in the future.
                 
  Quarter Ended April 30,  Six Months Ended April 30, 
  2009  2010  2009  2010 
Pro forma revenue $415,201  $351,248  $855,637  $783,160 
             
Pro forma net loss $(593,601) $160,420  $(735,467) $384,790 
             
(4) GOODWILL AND LONG-LIVED ASSETS
Goodwill
     As a result of its acquisition of the MEN Business, Ciena recorded goodwill of $40.0 million. This goodwill was assigned to the Packet-Optical Transport reporting unit as that unit is expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination.
     The table below sets forth changes in the carrying amount of goodwill in each of our reporting units for the period indicated (in thousands):
                     
          Carrier    
  Packet- Packet- Ethernet Software  
  Optical Optical Service and  
  Transport Switching Delievery Services Total
   
Balance as of October 31, 2009 $  $ —  $ —  $ —  $ 
Acquired  39,991            39,991 
   
Balance as of April 30, 2010 $39,991  $  $  $  $39,991 
   
     The table below sets forth changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the period indicated (in thousands):
     
  Total 
Balance as of October 31, 2008 $455,673 
Impairment loss  (455,673)
    
Balance as of April 30, 2009 $ 
    
Goodwill Impairment

14


     Prior to the acquisition of the MEN Business, Ciena assessed its goodwill based upon a single reporting unit and tested its single reporting unit’s goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, which Ciena has determined to be the last business day of fiscal September each year. Testing is required between annual tests if events occur or circumstances change that would, more likely than not, reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying value. Based on a combination of factors, including current macroeconomic conditions and a sustained decline in Ciena’s common stock price and market capitalization below net book value, Ciena conducted an interim impairment assessment of goodwill during the second quarter of fiscal 2009. Ciena performed the step one fair value comparison, and its market capitalization was $721.8 million and its carrying value, including goodwill, was $949.0 million. Ciena applied a 25% control premium to its market capitalization to determine a fair value of $902.2 million. Because step one indicated that Ciena’s fair value was less than its carrying value, Ciena performed the step two analysis. Under the step two analysis, the implied fair value of goodwill requires valuation of a reporting unit’s tangible and intangible assets and liabilities in a manner similar to the allocation of purchase price in a business combination. If the closing doescarrying value of a reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, goodwill is deemed impaired and is written down to the extent of the difference. The implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill was determined to be $0, and, as a result, Ciena recorded a goodwill impairment of $455.7 million, representing the full carrying value of the goodwill.
Long-Lived Assets
     Ciena’s long-lived assets, excluding goodwill, include: equipment, furniture and fixtures; finite-lived intangible assets; and maintenance spares. Ciena tests long-lived assets for impairment whenever triggering events or changes in circumstances indicate that the assets’ carrying amount is not take place on or beforerecoverable from its undiscounted cash flows. Ciena’s long-lived assets are assigned to reporting units which represent the lowest level for which cash flows can be identified.
     Due to the reorganization described in Note 2 above, Ciena performed an impairment analysis of its long-lived assets during the second quarter of fiscal 2010. As of April 30, 2010, the applicablebased on Ciena’s estimate of future, undiscounted cash flows by asset sale agreementsgroup, no impairment was required. If actual market conditions differ or forecasts change, Ciena may be terminated by either party.required to record a non-cash impairment charge related to long-lived assets in future periods. Such charges would have the effect of decreasing Ciena’s earnings or increasing its losses in such period.
(5) RESTRUCTURING COSTS
     In April 2010, Ciena has been granted early terminationcommitted to certain restructuring actions and subsequently effected a headcount reduction of approximately 70 employees, principally affecting our Global Product Group and Global Field Organization outside of the antitrust waiting periods under the Hart-Scott-Rodino ActEurope, Middle East and the Canadian Competition Act. On December 2, 2009, the bankruptcy courtsAfrica (EMEA) region. This action resulted in a restructuring charge of $1.9 million in the U.S. and Canada approved the asset sale agreement relating to Ciena’s acquisitionsecond quarter of substantially all of the North American, Caribbean and Latin American and Asian optical networking and carrier Ethernet assets of Nortel’s MEN business. Completion of the transaction remains subject to information and consultation with employee representatives and employees in certain international jurisdictions and customary closing conditions.
(4) RESTRUCTURING COSTSfiscal 2010.
     The following table sets forth the activity and balance of the restructuring liability accounts for the threesix months ended January 31,April 30, 2010 (in thousands):
            
 Consolidation               
 Workforce of excess    Workforce Consolidation of   
 reduction facilities Total  reduction excess facilities Total 
Balance at October 31, 2009 $170 $9,435 $9,605  $170 $9,435 $9,605 
Additional liability recorded  (21)   (21) 1,828  1,828 
Cash payments  (82)  (752)  (834)  (101)  (1,525)  (1,626)
              
Balance at January 31, 2010 $67 $8,683 $8,750 
Balance at April 30, 2010 $1,897 $7,910 $9,807 
              
Current restructuring liabilities $67 $1,499 $1,566  $1,897 $1,373 $3,270 
              
Non-current restructuring liabilities $ $7,184 $7,184  $ $6,537 $6,537 
              
     In May 2010, following the end of its fiscal second quarter, Ciena informed employees of its proposal to reorganize and restructure portions of Ciena’s business and operations in the EMEA region. Ciena anticipates reductions to its workforce in EMEA of approximately 120 to 140 positions in the near term with reductions expected to principally affect employees in Ciena’s Global Field Organization and Global Supply Chain organization. Execution of any specific reorganization is subject to local legal requirements, including notification and consultation processes with employees and employee representatives. Ciena estimates completing the reorganization by August 31, 2010. These actions are intended to reduce operating expense and better align Ciena’s workforce and operating costs with market and business opportunities following the completion of Ciena’s acquisition of the MEN Business. At this time, Ciena is unable to reasonably estimate the future impact of this activity on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.

15


     The following table sets forth the activity and balance of the restructuring liability accounts for the threesix months ended January 31,April 30, 2009 (in thousands):
    
 Consolidation             
 of excess  Workforce Consolidation of   
 facilities  reduction excess facilities Total 
Balance at October 31, 2008 $4,225  $982 $3,243 $4,225 
Additional liability recorded 76  3,575 2,900 6,475 
Cash payments  (1,287)  (2,460)  (377)  (2,837)
          
Balance at January 31, 2009 $3,014 
Balance at April 30, 2009 $2,097 $5,766 $7,863 
          
Current restructuring liabilities $611  $2,097 $1,054 $3,151 
          
Non-current restructuring liabilities $2,403  $ $4,712 $4,712 
          

13


(5)(6) MARKETABLE SECURITIES
     As of the dates indicated, short-term and long-term investments are comprised of the following (in thousands):
                                
 January 31, 2010  April 30, 2010 
 Gross Unrealized Gross Unrealized Estimated Fair  Gross Unrealized Gross Unrealized Estimated Fair 
 Amortized Cost Gains Losses Value  Amortized Cost Gains Losses Value 
U.S. government obligations $435,991 $273 $ $436,264  $29,299 $ $ $29,299 
Publicly traded equity securities 193   193  238   238 
                  
 $436,184 $273 $ $436,457  $29,537 $ $ $29,537 
                  
Included in short-term investments 428,205 204  428,409  29,537   29,537 
Included in long-term investments 7,979 69  8,048      
                  
 $436,184 $273 $ $436,457  $29,537 $ $ $29,537 
                  
                 
  October 31, 2009 
      Gross Unrealized  Gross Unrealized  Estimated Fair 
  Amortized Cost  Gains  Losses  Value 
U.S. government obligations $570,505  $460  $2  $570,963 
Publicly traded equity securities  251         251 
             
  $570,756  $460  $2  $571,214 
             
Included in short-term investments  562,781   404  $2   563,183 
Included in long-term investments  7,975   56      8,031 
             
  $570,756  $460  $2  $571,214 
             
     Gross unrealized losses related to marketable debt investments, included in short-term and long-term investments, were primarily due to changes in interest rates. Ciena’s management determined that the gross unrealized losses at October 31, 2009 were temporary in nature because Ciena had the ability and intent to hold these investments until a recovery of fair value, which may be maturity. As of the dates indicated, gross unrealized losses were as follows (in thousands):

16


\

                         
  January 31,April 30, 2010 
  Unrealized Losses Less  Unrealized Losses 12    
  Than 12 Months  Months or Greater  Total 
  Gross      Gross      Gross    
  Unrealized      Unrealized      Unrealized    
  Losses  Fair Value  Losses  Fair Value  Losses  Fair Value 
U.S. government obligations $  $  $  $  $  $ 
                   
  $  $  $  $  $  $ 
                   
                         
  October 31, 2009 
  Unrealized Losses Less  Unrealized Losses 12    
  Than 12 Months  Months or Greater  Total 
  Gross      Gross      Gross    
  Unrealized      Unrealized      Unrealized    
  Losses  Fair Value  Losses  Fair Value  Losses  Fair Value 
U.S. government obligations $2  $37,744  $  $  $2  $37,744 
                   
  $2  $37,744  $  $  $2  $37,744 
                   
     The following table summarizes final legal maturities of debt investments at January 31,April 30, 2010 (in thousands):
        
 Amortized Estimated         
 Cost Fair Value  Amortized Cost Estimated Fair Value 
Less than one year $428,012 $428,216  $29,299 $29,299 
Due in 1-2 years 7,979 8,048    
          
 $435,991 $436,264  $29,299 $29,299 
          

14


(6)(7) FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
     As of the dates indicated, the following table summarizes the fair value of assets that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):
                
                 April 30, 2010 
 January 31, 2010  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total 
Assets: Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total  
U.S. government obligations $ $436,264 $ $436,264  $ $29,299 $ $29,299 
Embedded redemption feature   8,350 8,350 
Publicly traded equity securities 193   193  238   238 
                  
Total assets measured at fair value $193 $436,264 $ $436,457  $238 $29,299 $8,350 $37,887 
                  
     As of the date indicated, the assets and liabilities above were presented on Ciena’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as follows (in thousands):
                 
  April 30, 2010 
  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total 
Assets:                
Short-term investments $238  $29,299  $  $29,537 
Other long-term assets        8,350   8,350 
             
Total assets measured at fair value $238  $29,299  $8,350  $37,887 
             
     Ciena’s Level 1 assets include corporate equity securities publicly traded on major exchanges that are valued using quoted prices in active markets. Ciena’s Level 2 investments include U.S. government obligations. These investments are valued using observable inputs such as quoted market prices, benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. Investments are held by a custodian who obtains investment prices from a third party pricing provider that uses standard inputs to models which vary by asset class.
     As of January 31, 2010, Ciena did not hold financial assets or liabilities recorded at fair value based onCiena’s Level 3 inputs.asset reflects the embedded redemption feature contained within Ciena’s 4.0% convertible senior notes. See Note 15 below. The embedded redemption feature is bifurcated from Ciena’s 4.0% convertible senior notes using the “with-and-without” approach. As such, the total value of the embedded redemption feature is calculated as the difference between the value of the 4.0% convertible senior notes (the “Hybrid Instrument”) and the value of an identical instrument but without the embedded redemption feature (the “Host Instrument”). Both the Host Instrument and the Hybrid Instrument are valued using a modified binomial model. The modified binomial model utilizes a risk free interest rate, an implied volatility of Ciena’s stock, the recovery rates of bonds, and the implied default intensity of the 4.0% convertible senior notes.

17


     As of the datedates indicated, the assets and liabilities above were presented on Ciena’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as follows (in thousands):following table sets forth, in thousands, the reconciliation of changes in Level 3 fair value measurements:
                 
  January 31, 2010 
Assets: Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total 
Short-term investments $193  $428,216  $  $428,409 
Long-term investments     8,048      8,048 
             
Total assets measured at fair value $193  $436,264  $  $436,457 
             
     
  Level 3 
Balance at October 31, 2009 $ 
Issuances  1,710 
Changes in unrealized gain (loss)  6,640 
Transfers into Level 3   
Transfers out of Level 3   
    
Balance at April 30, 2010 $8,350 
    
Fair value of outstanding convertible notes
     At January 31,April 30, 2010, the fair value of the outstanding $500.0 million of 0.875% convertible senior notes, $375.0 million of 4.0% convertible senior notes and $298.0 million of 0.25% convertible senior notes was $335.0$385.6 million, $443.6 million and $245.2$260.2 million, respectively. Fair value for the 0.875% and the 0.25% convertible senior notes is based on the quoted market price for the notes on the date above. Due to the lack of trading activity, fair value of the 4.0% convertible senior notes is based on a modified binomial model. The modified binomial model utilizes a risk free interest rate, an implied volatility of Ciena’s stock, the recovery rates of bonds, and the implied default intensity of the 4.0% convertible senior notes.
(7)(8) ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
     As of October 31, 2009 one customer accounted for 10.7% of net accounts receivable, and as of January 31,April 30, 2010 twono customers in aggregate accounted for 22.6%greater than 10.0% of net accounts receivable.
     Ciena’s allowance for doubtful accounts receivable is based on management’s assessment, on a specific identification basis, of the collectibility of customer accounts. As of October 31, 2009 and January 31,April 30, 2010, allowance for doubtful accounts was $0.1 million.
(8)(9) INVENTORIES
     As of the dates indicated, inventories are comprised of the following (in thousands):
                
 October 31, January 31,  October 31, April 30, 
 2009 2010  2009 2010 
Raw materials $19,694 $18,256  $19,694 $21,309 
Work-in-process 1,480 2,255  1,480 3,958 
Finished goods 90,914 98,264  90,914 236,135 
          
 112,088 118,775  112,088 261,402 
 
Provision for excess and obsolescence  (24,002)  (23,344)  (24,002)  (27,997)
          
 $88,086 $95,431  $88,086 $233,405 
          
     Ciena writes down its inventory for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory in an amount equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated market value, based on assumptions about future demand and market conditions. During the first threesix months of fiscal 2010, Ciena recorded a provision for excess and obsolescence related to its pre-acquisition inventory of $7.1 million, primarily due to product rationalization decisions in connection with the acquisition of the MEN Business. Deductions from the provision for excess and obsolete inventory relate to disposal activities. The following table summarizes the activity in Ciena’s reserve for excess and obsolete inventory for the period indicated (in thousands):
     
  Inventory 
  Reserve 
Reserve balance as of October 31, 2009 $24,002 
Provision for excess for obsolescence  7,100 
Actual inventory disposed  (3,105)
    
Reserve balance as of April 30, 2010 $27,997 
    
     During the first six months of fiscal 2009, Ciena recorded a provision for excess and obsolete inventory of $1.0$8.8 million, primarily related to changes in forecasted sales for certain products. Deductions from the provision for excess and obsolete inventory relate to disposal activities. The following table summarizes the activity in Ciena’s reserve for excess and obsolete inventory for the period indicated (in thousands):

1518


     
  Inventory 
  Reserve 
Reserve balance as of October 31, 2009 $24,002 
Provision for excess for obsolescence  950 
Actual inventory disposed  (1,608)
    
Reserve balance as of January 31, 2010 $23,344 
    
     During the first three months of fiscal 2009, Ciena recorded a provision for excess and obsolete inventory of $6.5 million, primarily related to changes in forecasted sales for certain products. Deductions from the provision for excess and obsolete inventory relate to disposal activities. The following table summarizes the activity in Ciena’s reserve for excess and obsolete inventory for the period indicated (in thousands):
        
 Inventory  Inventory 
 Reserve  Reserve 
Reserve balance as of October 31, 2008 $23,257  $23,257 
Provision for excess and obsolescence 6,548  8,809 
Actual inventory disposed  (5,155)  (9,928)
      
Reserve balance as of January 31, 2009 $24,650 
Reserve balance as of April 30, 2009 $22,138 
      
(9)(10) PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER
     As of the dates indicated, prepaid expenses and other are comprised of the following (in thousands):
                
 October 31, January 31,  October 31, April 30, 
 2009 2010  2009 2010 
Interest receivable $993 $814  $993 $3 
Prepaid VAT and other taxes 14,527 16,857  14,527 23,221 
Deferred deployment expense 4,242 4,647  4,242 5,749 
Product demonstration units, net  27,954 
Prepaid expenses 8,869 8,401  8,869 9,765 
Deposit on pending business acquisition  38,450 
Capitalized acquisition costs 12,473   12,473  
Restricted cash 7,477 5,371  7,477 6,908 
MEN Business purchase price adjustment receivable  18,685 
Other non-trade receivables 1,956 883  1,956 2,961 
          
 $50,537 $75,423  $50,537 $95,246 
          
     Prepaid expenses and other as of April 30, 2010 include $28.0 million and $18.7 million related to product demonstration units, net acquired as part of the MEN Business and the MEN Business purchase price adjustment receivable, respectively. Capitalized acquisition costs at October 31, 2009 include direct costs related to Ciena’s then pending acquisition of the optical networking and carrier Ethernet assets of Nortel’s MEN business.Business. In the first quarter of fiscal 2010, Ciena adopted newly issued accounting guidance related to business combinations, which required the full amount of these capitalized acquisition costs to be expensed in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. The deposit on pending business acquisition represents the initial payment of $38.5 million related to Ciena’s pending acquisition of the optical networking and carrier Ethernet assets of Nortel’s MEN business. See Note 3 above.
(10)(11) EQUIPMENT, FURNITURE AND FIXTURES
     As of the dates indicated, equipment, furniture and fixtures are comprised of the following (in thousands):
                
 October 31, January 31,  October 31, April 30, 
 2009 2010  2009 2010 
Equipment, furniture and fixtures $293,093 $299,908  $293,093 $347,499 
Leasehold improvements 45,761 45,002  45,761 48,853 
          
 338,854 344,910  338,854 396,352 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization  (276,986)  (280,559)  (276,986)  (285,467)
          
 $61,868 $64,351  $61,868 $110,885 
          

16


     Depreciation of equipment, furniture and fixtures, and amortization of leasehold improvements was $5.1$10.8 million and $5.9$13.5 million for the first threesix months of fiscal 2009 and 2010, respectively.
(11)(12) OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
As of the dates indicated, other intangible assets are comprised of the following (in thousands):

19


                                                
 October 31, January 31,  October 31, April 30, 
 2009 2010  2009 2010 
 Gross Accumulated Net Gross Accumulated Net  Gross Accumulated Net Gross Accumulated Net 
 Intangible Amortization Intangible Intangible Amortization Intangible  Intangible Amortization Intangible Intangible Amortization Intangible 
Finite-lived intangibles: 
Developed technology $185,833 $(147,504) $38,329 $185,833 $(152,316) $33,517  $185,833 $(147,504) $38,329 $406,833 $(160,228) $246,605 
Patents and licenses 47,370  (42,811) 4,559 47,615  (43,800) 3,815  47,370  (42,811) 4,559 45,388  (44,568) 820 
Customer relationships, covenants not to compete, outstanding purchase orders and contracts 60,981  (43,049) 17,932 60,981  (44,880) 16,101  60,981  (43,049) 17,932 320,945  (62,185) 258,760 
                      
Total finite-lived intangibles 294,184  (233,364) 60,820 773,166  (266,981) 506,185 
 $294,184 $60,820 $294,429 $53,433              
          
Indefinite-lived intangibles: 
In-process research and development    11,000   11,000 
             
Total indefinite-lived intangibles    11,000  11,000 
             
Total other intangible assets $294,184 $(233,364) $60,820 $784,166 $(266,981) $517,185 
             
     The aggregate amortization expense of finite-lived other intangible assets was $8.1$15.9 million and $7.6$27.8 million for the first threesix months of fiscal 2009 and 2010, respectively. In addition, during the second quarter of fiscal 2010, revenue was reduced by $5.8 million related to the amortization of contract assets from the acquisition of the MEN Business. In-process research and development assets are impaired, if abandoned, or amortized in future periods, depending upon the ability of Ciena to use the research and development in future periods. See Note 3 above for information pertaining to newly acquired intangible assets related to the MEN Business. Expected future amortization of finite-lived other intangible assets for the fiscal years indicated is as follows (in thousands):
       
Period ended October 31,  
2010 (remaining nine months) $20,309 
2010 (remaining six months) $94,235 
2011 13,933  91,373 
2012 9,555  71,993 
2013 7,230  69,573 
2014 2,406  55,415 
Thereafter 123,596 
      
 $53,433  $506,185 
      
(12)(13) OTHER BALANCE SHEET DETAILS
     As of the dates indicated, other long-term assets are comprised of the following (in thousands):
                
 October 31, January 31,  October 31, April 30, 
 2009 2010  2009 2010 
Maintenance spares inventory, net $31,994 $34,586  $31,994 $54,348 
Restricted cash 18,792 28,407 
Deferred debt issuance costs, net 12,832 12,258  12,832 22,046 
Embedded redemption feature  8,350 
Investments in privately held companies 907 907  907 907 
Restricted cash 18,792 26,419 
Other 3,377 3,038  3,377 3,466 
          
 $67,902 $77,208  $67,902 $117,524 
          
     Deferred debt issuance costs are amortized using the straight line method which approximates the effect of the effective interest rate method on the maturity of the related debt. Amortization of debt issuance costs, which is included in interest expense, was $0.6$1.1 million and $1.5 million during the first threesix months of fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010.2010, respectively.
     As of the dates indicated, accrued liabilities are comprised of the following (in thousands):

1720


                
 October 31, January 31,  October 31, April 30, 
 2009 2010  2009 2010 
Warranty $40,196 $38,437  $40,196 $64,681 
Compensation, payroll related tax and benefits 20,025 17,824  20,025 38,824 
Vacation 11,508 11,782  11,508 15,386 
Interest payable 2,045 738  2,045 3,965 
Other 29,575 28,779  29,575 62,952 
          
 $103,349 $97,560  $103,349 $185,808 
          
     The following table summarizes the activity in Ciena’s accrued warranty for the fiscal periods indicated (in thousands):
                                    
Three months ended Beginning Balance at
January 31, Balance Provisions Settlements end of period
Six months ended Beginning Balance at end of
April 30, Balance Acquired Provisions Settlements period
2009 $37,258   2,541   (3,692) $36,107  $37,258  9,235  (7,610) $38,883 
2010 $40,196   3,060   (4,819) $38,437  $40,196 26,000 8,847  (10,362) $64,681 
     As of the dates indicated, deferred revenue is comprised of the following (in thousands):
                
 October 31, January 31,  October 31, April 30, 
 2009 2010  2009 2010 
Products $11,998 $15,536  $11,998 $13,265 
Services 63,935 65,363  63,935 78,426 
          
 75,933 80,899  75,933 91,691 
Less current portion  (40,565)  (43,722)  (40,565)  (56,713)
          
Long-term deferred revenue $35,368 $37,177  $35,368 $34,978 
          
(13) DERIVATIVES(14) FOREIGN CURRENCY FORWARD CONTRACTS
     Ciena uses foreign currency forward contracts to reduce variability in non-U.S. dollar denominated operating expenses. Ciena uses these derivatives to partially offset its market exposure to fluctuations in certain foreign currencies. These derivatives are designated as cash flow hedges and have maturities of less than one year. These forward contracts are not designed to provide foreign currency protection over the long-term. Ciena considers several factors, including offsetting exposures, significance of exposures, costs associated with entering into a particular instrument, and potential effectiveness when designing its hedging activities.
     The effective portion of the derivative’s gain or loss is initially reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and, upon occurrence of the forecasted transaction, is subsequently reclassified into the operating expense line item to which the hedged transaction relates. Ciena records the ineffective portion of the hedging instruments in interest and other income, net. As of October 31, 2009 and January 31,April 30, 2010, there were no foreign currency forward contracts outstanding and Ciena did not enter into any foreign currency forward contracts during the first threesix months of fiscal 2010.
     Ciena’s foreign currency forward contracts are classified as follows:follows (in thousands):

1821


                        
 Reclassified to Condensed  Reclassified to Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations 
 Consolidated Statement of  (Effective Portion) 
 Operations 
 (Effective Portion) 
 Quarter Ended January 31, 
Line Item in Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations 2009 2010 
Line Item in Condensed Consolidated Statement of Quarter Ended April 30, Six Months Ended April 30, 
Operations 2009 2010 2009 2010 
Research and development $40 $  $264 $ $304 $ 
Selling and marketing 165   573  738  
              
 $205 $  $837 $ $1,042 $ 
              
                        
 Recognized in Other  Recognized in Other Recognized in Other 
 Comprehensive Income (Loss)  Comprehensive Income (Loss) Comprehensive Income (Loss) 
 Quarter Ended January 31,  Quarter Ended April 30, Six Months Ended April 30, 
Line Item in Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet 2009 2010  2009 2010 2009 2010 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) $(2,295) $  $811 $ $(1,484) $ 
              
 $(2,295) $  $811 $ $(1,484) $ 
              
                        
 Ineffective Portion  Ineffective Portion Ineffective Portion 
 Quarter Ended January 31, 
Line Item in Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations 2009 2010 
Line Item in Condensed Consolidated Statement Quarter Ended April 30, Six Months Ended April 30, 
of Operations 2009 2010 2009 2010 
Interest and other income, net $ $  $ $ $ $ 
              
 $ $  $ $ $ $ 
              
(14)(15) CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE
Ciena 4.0% Convertible Senior Notes, due March 15, 2015
     On March 15, 2010, Ciena completed a private placement of 4.0% convertible senior notes due March 15, 2015, in aggregate principal amount of $375.0 million (the “Notes”). Interest is payable on the Notes on March 15 and September 15 of each year, beginning on September 15, 2010. The Notes are senior unsecured obligations of Ciena and rank equally with all of Ciena’s other existing and future senior unsecured debt.
     At the election of the holder, the Notes may be converted prior to maturity into shares of Ciena common stock at the initial conversion rate of 49.0557 shares per $1,000 in principal amount, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $20.38 per share. The Notes may be redeemed by Ciena on or after March 15, 2013 if the closing sale price of Ciena’s common stock for at least 20 trading days in any 30 consecutive trading day period ending on the date one day prior to the date of the notice of redemption exceeds 150% of the conversion price. Ciena may redeem the Notes in whole or in part, at a redemption price in cash equal to the principal amount to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest, including any additional interest to, but excluding, the redemption date, plus a “make-whole premium” payment. The “make whole premium” payment will be made in cash and equal the present value of the remaining interest payments, to maturity, computed using a discount rate equal to 2.75%. This redemption feature is accounted for as a separate embedded derivative and, for accounting purposes, is bifurcated from the indenture because it is not clearly and closely related to the Notes. As of April 30, 2010, the embedded redemption feature in the amount of $8.4 million is included in other long-term assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. During the first six months of fiscal 2010, the changes in fair value of the embedded redemption feature in the amount of $6.6 million were reflected as interest and other income (expense), net on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.
     The shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Notes have not been registered for resale on a shelf registration statement. In some instances, Ciena’s failure to timely file periodic reports with the SEC or remove restrictive legends on the Notes may require it to pay additional interest on the Notes; which will accrue at the rate of 0.50% per annum of the principal amount of Notes outstanding for each day such failure to file or to remove the restrictive legend has occurred and is continuing.
     If Ciena undergoes a “fundamental change” (as that term is defined in the indenture governing the Notes to include certain change in control transactions), holders of Notes will have the right, subject to certain exemptions, to require Ciena to purchase for cash any or all of their Notes

22


at a price equal to the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. If the holder elects to convert his or her Notes in connection with a specified fundamental change, in certain circumstances, Ciena will be required to increase the applicable conversion rate, depending on the price paid per share for Ciena common stock and the effective date of the fundamental change transaction.
     The indenture governing the Notes provides for customary events of default which include (subject in certain cases to customary grace and cure periods), among others, the following: nonpayment of principal or interest; breach of covenants or other agreements in the Indenture; defaults in failure to pay certain other indebtedness; and certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency. Generally, if an event of default occurs and is continuing, the trustee or the holders of at least 25% in aggregate principal amount of the Notes may declare the principal of, accrued interest on, and premium, if any, on all the Notes immediately due and payable.
     Ciena estimates that the net proceeds from the offering of the Notes are approximately $364.3 million after deducting the placement agents’ fees and other estimated fees and expenses. Ciena used $243.8 million of this amount to fund its payment election to replace its contractual obligation to issue convertible notes to Nortel as part of the aggregate purchase price for the acquisition of the MEN Business. The remaining proceeds were used to reduce the cash on hand required to fund the aggregate purchase price of the MEN Business. See Note 3 above.
(16) EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE CALCULATION
     The following table (in thousands except per share amounts) is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the basic net income (loss) per common share (“Basic EPS”) and the diluted net income (loss) per potential common share (“Diluted EPS”). Basic EPS is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted EPS is computed using the weighted average number of (i) common shares outstanding, (ii) shares issuable upon vesting of restricted stock units, (iii) shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options, employee stock purchase plan options and warrants using the treasury stock method; and (iv) shares underlying the 0.25% and 0.875%Ciena’s outstanding convertible senior notes.
                 
  Quarter Ended April 30,  Six Months Ended April 30, 
Numerator 2009  2010  2009  2010 
Net loss $(503,210) $90,009  $(528,041) $143,342 
Add: Interest expense for 0.250% convertible senior notes            
Add: Interest expense for 4.000% convertible senior notes            
Add: Interest expense for 0.875% convertible senior notes            
             
Net loss used to calculate diluted EPS $(503,210) $90,009  $(528,041) $143,342 
             
                 
  Quarter Ended April 30,  Six Months Ended April 30, 
Denominator 2009  2010  2009  2010 
Basic weighted average shares outstanding  90,932   92,614   90,777   92,590 
Add: Shares underlying outstanding stock options, employees stock purchase plan options, warrants and restricted stock units            
Add: Shares underlying 0.250% convertible senior notes            
Add: Shares underlying 4.000% convertible senior notes            
Add: Shares underlying 0.875% convertible senior notes            
             
Dilutive weighted average shares outstanding  90,932   92,614   90,777   92,590 
             
                 
  Quarter Ended April 30,  Six Months Ended April 30, 
EPS 2009  2010  2009  2010 
Basic EPS $(5.53) $(0.97) $(5.82) $(1.55)
             
Diluted EPS $(5.53) $(0.97) $(5.82) $(1.55)
             

1923


         
 Quarter Ended January 31, 
Numerator 2009  2010 
Net loss $(24,831) $(53,333)
Add: Interest expense for 0.250% convertible senior notes      
Add: Interest expense for 0.875% convertible senior notes      
       
Net loss used to calculate diluted EPS. $(24,831) $(53,333)
       
         
 Quarter Ended January 31, 
Denominator 2009  2010 
Basic weighted average shares outstanding  90,620   92,321 
Add: Shares underlying outstanding stock options, employees stock purchase plan options, warrants and restricted stock      
Add: Shares underlying 0.250% convertible senior notes      
Add: Shares underlying 0.875% convertible senior notes      
       
Dilutive weighted average shares outstanding  90,620   92,321 
       
         
 Quarter Ended January 31, 
EPS 2009  2010 
Basic EPS $(0.27) $(0.58)
       
Diluted EPS $(0.27) $(0.58)
       
Explanation of Shares Excluded due to Anti-Dilutive Effect
     For the quartersquarter and six months ended January 31,April 30, 2009, and January 31, 2010, the weighted average number of shares set forth in the table below, underlying outstanding stock options, employee stock purchase plan options, restricted stock units, and warrants, is considered anti-dilutive because Ciena incurred a net loss. In addition, the shares, representing the weighted average number of shares issuable upon conversion of Ciena’s 0.25% convertible senior notes, 4.0% convertible senior notes and 0.875% convertible senior notes, are considered anti-dilutive because the related interest expense on a per common share “if converted” basis exceeds Basic EPS for the period.
     For the quarter and six months ended April 30, 2010, the weighted average number of shares set forth in the table below, underlying outstanding stock options, employee stock purchase plan options, restricted stock units, and warrants, is considered anti-dilutive because Ciena incurred a net loss. In addition, the shares, representing the weighted average number of shares issuable upon conversion of Ciena’s 0.875%outstanding convertible senior notes, are considered anti-dilutive because the related interest expense on a per common share “if converted” basis exceeds Basic EPS for the period.
     The following table summarizes the shares excluded from the calculation of the denominator for Basic and Diluted EPS due to their anti-dilutive effect for the periods indicated (in thousands):
         
  Quarter Ended January 31, 
Shares Excluded from EPS Denominator due to Anti-dilutive Effect 2009  2010 
Shares underlying stock options, restricted stock units and warrants  8,052   7,494 
0.250% convertible senior notes  7,539   7,539 
0.875% convertible senior notes  13,108   13,108 
       
Total excluded due to anti-dilutive effect  28,699   28,141 
       
Shares excluded from EPS Denominator due to anti-dilutive effect
                 
  Quarter Ended April 30,  Six Months Ended April 30, 
  2009  2010  2009  2010 
Shares underlying stock options, restricted stock units and warrants  7,992   2,082   7,950   1,864 
0.25% convertible senior notes  7,539   7,539   7,539   7,539 
4.00% convertible senior notes     9,607      4,777 
0.875% convertible senior notes  13,108   13,108   13,108   13,108 
             
Total excluded due to anti-dilutive effect  28,639   32,336   28,597   27,288 
             
(15)(17) SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION EXPENSE
     Ciena makesgrants equity awards under its 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan (“2008 Plan”) and 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”). These plans were approved by shareholders and are described in Ciena’s annual report on Form 10-K. In connection with its acquisition of the MEN Business, Ciena also adopted the 2010 Inducement Equity Award Plan, pursuant to which it has made awards to eligible persons as described below.
2008 Plan
     Ciena has previously granted stock options and restricted stock units under its 2008 Plan. Pursuant to Board and stockholder approval, effective April 14, 2010 Ciena amended its 2008 Plan to (i) increase the number of shares available for issuance by five million shares; and (ii) reduce from 1.6 to 1.31 the fungible share ratio used for counting full value awards, such as restricted stock units, against the shares remaining available under the 2008 Plan. As of January 31,April 30, 2010, there were approximately 1.26.1 million shares authorized and remaining available for issuance thereunder.under the 2008 Plan.

20

2010 Inducement Equity Award Plan


     On December 8, 2009, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved the 2010 Inducement Equity Award Plan (the “2010 Plan”). The 2010 Plan is intended to enhance Ciena’s ability to attract and retain certain key employees transferred to Ciena in connection with its acquisition of the MEN Business. The 2010 Plan authorizes the issuance of restricted stock or restricted stock units representing up to 2.25 million shares of Ciena common stock. Upon the March 19, 2011 termination of the 2010 Plan, any shares then remaining available shall cease to be available for issuance under the 2010 Plan or any other existing Ciena equity incentive plan. As of April 30, 2010, there were approximately 0.6 million shares authorized and available for issuance under the 2010 Plan.
Stock Options
     Outstanding stock option awards to employees are generally subject to service-based vesting restrictions and vest incrementally over a four-year period. The following table is a summary of Ciena’s stock option activity for the periods indicated (shares in thousands):

24


        
         Shares Weighted 
 Shares Underlying Weighted  Underlying Average 
 Options Average  Options Exercise 
 Outstanding Exercise Price  Outstanding Price 
Balance as of October 31, 2009 5,538 $45.80  5,538 $45.80 
Granted 80 12.33  84 12.40 
Exercised  (40) 2.29   (78) 13.53 
Canceled  (184) 76.69   (319) 76.06 
      
Balance as of January 31, 2010 5,394 $44.57 
Balance as of April 30, 2010 5,225 $44.02 
      
     The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the first threesix months of fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010, was $0.2$0.4 million and $0.3$0.7 million, respectively. The weighted average fair values of each stock option granted by Ciena during the first threesix months of fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 were $4.43$4.26 and $6.91,$6.95, respectively.
     The following table summarizes information with respect to stock options outstanding at January 31,April 30, 2010, based on Ciena’s closing stock price of $12.75$18.53 per share on the last trading day of Ciena’s firstsecond fiscal quarter of 2010 (shares and intrinsic value in thousands):
                                     
   Options Outstanding at January 31, 2010  Vested Options at January 31, 2010 
       Weighted              Weighted       
       Average              Average       
       Remaining  Weighted          Remaining  Weighted    
Range of Number  Contractual  Average  Aggregate  Number  Contractual  Average  Aggregate 
Exercise of  Life  Exercise  Intrinsic  of  Life  Exercise  Intrinsic 
Price Shares  (Years)  Price  Value  Shares  (Years)  Price  Value 
$0.01-$16.52  961   6.95  $10.97  $3,124   647   5.85  $11.66  $2,104 
$16.53-$17.43  549   5.75   17.21      501   5.48   17.21    
$17.44-$22.96  460   5.13   21.77      411   4.77   21.89    
$22.97-$31.71  1,493   4.95   29.42      1,280   4.51   29.62    
$31.72-$46.90  897   6.23   39.44      645   5.60   40.07    
$46.91-$73.78  462   2.85   59.07      462   2.85   59.07    
$73.79-$1,046.50  572   1.56   181.35      572   1.56   181.35    
                              
$0.01-$1,046.50  5,394   5.07  $44.57  $3,124   4,518   4.44  $48.70  $2,104 
                              
                                 
  Options Outstanding at April 30, 2010  Vested Options at April 30, 2010 
      Weighted              Weighted       
      Average              Average       
      Remaining  Weighted          Remaining  Weighted    
Range of Number  Contractual  Average  Aggregate  Number  Contractual  Average  Aggregate 
Exercise of  Life  Exercise  Intrinsic  of  Life  Exercise  Intrinsic 
Price Shares  (Years)  Price  Value  Shares  (Years)  Price  Value 
$ 0.01 - $16.52  898   6.95  $11.07  $6,698   629   5.95  $11.51  $4,417 
$16.53 - $17.43  531   5.74   17.21   702   493   5.51   17.21   652 
$17.44 - $22.96  452   5.13   21.75   5   412   4.82   21.86   5 
$22.97 - $31.71  1,468   4.95   29.41      1,307   4.62   29.56    
$31.72 - $46.90  888   6.23   39.45      681   5.74   39.96    
$46.91 - $73.78  443   2.82   59.54      443   2.82   59.54    
$73.79 - $1,046.50  545   1.60   176.98      545   1.60   176.98    
                            
$ 0.01 - $1,046.50  5,225   5.08  $44.02  $7,405   4,510   4.55  $47.33  $5,074 
                            
     Assumptions for Option-Based Awards
     Ciena recognizes the fair value of service-based options as share-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. Ciena estimates the fair value of each option award on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, with the following weighted average assumptions:
                        
 Quarter Ended January 31,  Quarter Ended April 30, Six Months Ended April 30,
 2009 2010  2009 2010 2009 2010
Expected volatility  65.0%  61.9%  65.0%  61.9%  65.0%  61.9%
Risk-free interest rate.  1.7 - 2.2%  2.4 - 2.9%
Risk-free interest rate  2.1 - 2.4%  2.8 - 3.0%  1.7 - 2.4%  2.4 - 3/0%
Expected life (years) 5.2 - 5.3 5.3 - 5.5  5.2 - 5.3 5.3 - 5.5 5.2 - 5.3 5.3 - 5.5 
Expected dividend yield  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%
     Ciena considered the implied volatility and historical volatility of its stock price in determining its expected volatility, and, finding both to be equally reliable, determined that a combination of both would result in the best estimate of expected volatility.
     The risk-free interest rate assumption is based upon observed interest rates appropriate for the expected term of Ciena’s employee stock options.

21


     The expected life of employee stock options represents the weighted-average period the stock options are expected to remain outstanding. Ciena gathered detailed historical information about specific exercise behavior of its grantees, which it used to determine the expected term.

25


     The dividend yield assumption is based on Ciena’s history of not making dividends and its expectation of future dividend payouts.
     Because share-based compensation expense is recognized only for those awards that are ultimately expected to vest, the amount of share-based compensation expense recognized reflects a reduction for estimated forfeitures. Ciena estimates forfeitures at the time of grant and revises those estimates in subsequent periods based upon new or changed information. Ciena relies upon historical experience in establishing forfeiture rates. If actual forfeitures differ from current estimates, total unrecognized share-based compensation expense will be adjusted for future changes in estimated forfeitures.
     Restricted Stock Units
     A restricted stock unit is a stock award that entitles the holder to receive shares of Ciena common stock as the unit vests. Ciena’s outstanding restricted stock unit awards are subject to service-based vesting conditions and/or performance-based vesting conditions. Awards subject to service-based conditions typically vest in increments over a three to four year period. Awards with performance-based vesting conditions require the achievement of certain operational, financial or other performance criteria or targets as a condition of vesting, or acceleration of vesting, of such awards.
     Ciena’s outstanding restricted stock units include “performance-accelerated” restricted stock units (PARS), which vest in full four years after the date of grant (assuming that the grantee is still employed by Ciena at that time). Under the PARS, the Compensation Committee may establish performance targets which, if satisfied, provide for the acceleration of vesting of that portion of the award designated by the Compensation Committee. As a result, the grantee may have the opportunity, subject to satisfaction of performance conditions, to vest as to the entire award prior to the expiration of the four-year period above. Ciena recognizes the estimated fair value of performance-based awards, net of estimated forfeitures, as share-based expense over the performance period, using graded vesting, which considers each performance period or tranche separately, based upon Ciena’s determination of whether it is probable that the performance targets will be achieved. At each reporting period, Ciena reassesses the probability of achieving the performance targets and the performance period required to meet those targets.
     The aggregate intrinsic value of Ciena’s restricted stock units is based on Ciena’s closing stock price on the last trading day of each period as indicated. The following table is a summary of Ciena’s restricted stock unit activity for the periods indicated, with the aggregate intrinsic value of the balance outstanding at the end of each period, based on Ciena’s closing stock price on the last trading day of the relevant period (shares and aggregate intrinsic value in thousands):
            
                
 Weighted    Weighted   
 Average    Average   
 Restricted Grant Date Aggregate  Restricted Grant Date Aggregate 
 Stock Units Fair Value Intrinsic  Stock Units Fair Value Intrinsic 
 Outstanding Per Share Value  Outstanding Per Share Value 
Balance as of October 31, 2009 3,716 $14.67 $43,591  3,716 $14.67 $43,591 
Granted 1,389  3,175 
Vested  (488)   (930) 
Canceled or forfeited  (29)   (89) 
      
Balance as of January 31, 2010 4,588 $13.16 $58,503 
Balance as of April 30, 2010 5,872 $13.77 $108,808 
      
     The total fair value of restricted stock units that vested and were converted into common stock during the first threesix months of fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 was $1.2$3.8 million and $5.4$12.0 million, respectively. The weighted average fair value of each restricted stock unit granted by Ciena during the first threesix months of fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 was $6.94$6.96 and $11.01,$13.34, respectively.
     Assumptions for Restricted Stock Unit Awards
     The fair value of each restricted stock unit award is estimated using the intrinsic value method, which is based on the closing price on the date of grant. Share-based expense for service-based restricted stock unit awards is recognized, net of estimated forfeitures, ratably over the vesting period on a straight-line basis.

22


     Share-based expense for performance-based restricted stock unit awards, net of estimated forfeitures, is recognized ratably over the performance period based upon Ciena’s determination of whether it is probable that the performance targets will be achieved. At each reporting period, Ciena reassesses the probability of achieving the performance targets and the performance period required to meet those targets. The

26


estimation of whether the performance targets will be achieved involves judgment, and the estimate of expense is revised periodically based on the probability of achieving the performance targets. Revisions are reflected in the period in which the estimate is changed. If any performance goals are not met, no compensation cost is ultimately recognized against that goal and, to the extent previously recognized, compensation cost is reversed.
2010 Inducement Equity Award Plan
     On December 8, 2009, the Compensation Committee of the Ciena Board of Directors approved the 2010 Inducement Equity Award Plan (the “2010 Plan”). The 2010 Plan is intended to enhance Ciena’s ability to attract and retain certain key employees to be transferred to Ciena in connection with its pending acquisition of Nortel’s Metro Ethernet Networks (MEN) assets. The 2010 Plan authorizes issuance of restricted stock or restricted stock units representing up to 2.3 million shares of Ciena common stock. The 2010 Plan will terminate automatically one year following the closing date of the pending acquisition of the Nortel assets described above. Upon termination, any shares that remain available for issuance under the 2010 Plan shall cease to be available thereunder and shall not be available for issuance under any other existing Ciena equity incentive plan.
2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
     The ESPP is a non-compensatory plan and issuances thereunder do not result in share-based compensation expense. The following table is a summary of ESPP activity and shares available for issuance for the periods indicated (shares in thousands):
ESPP shares available
for issuance
Balance as of October 31, 20093,469
Evergreen provision102
Balance as of January 31, 20103,571
         
  ESPP shares available Intrinic value at exercise
  for issuance date
Balance as of October 31, 2009  3,469     
Evergreen provision  102     
Issued March 15, 2010  (33) $26 
         
Balance as of April 30, 2010  3,538     
         
Share-Based Compensation Expense for Periods Reported
     The following table summarizes share-based compensation expense for the periods indicated (in thousands):
                        
 Quarter Ended January 31,  Quarter Ended April 30, Six Months Ended April 30, 
 2009 2010  2009 2010 2009 2010 
Product costs $713 $379  $445 $549 $1,158 $927 
Service costs 397 430  425 452 822 883 
              
Share-based compensation expense included in cost of sales 1,110 809  870 1,001 1,980 1,810 
              
  
Research and development 2,566 2,387 
Research and development. 2,817 2,259 5,383 4,646 
Sales and marketing 2,703 2,458  2,685 2,665 5,388 5,123 
General and administrative 2,419 2,576  2,773 2,301 5,192 4,876 
Acquisition and integration costs  345  345 
              
Share-based compensation expense included in operating expense 7,688 7,421  8,275 7,570 15,963 14,990 
              
  
Share-based compensation expense capitalized in inventory, net  (304) 52   (48)  (53)  (352)  (1)
              
  
Total share-based compensation $8,494 $8,282  $9,097 $8,518 $17,591 $16,799 
              
     As of January 31,April 30, 2010, total unrecognized compensation expense was:was $78.5 million: (i) $10.5$8.5 million, which relates to unvested stock options and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.0 year; and (ii) $52.8$70.0 million, which relates to unvested restricted stock units and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.41.7 years.

23


(16)(18) COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
     The components of comprehensive loss were as follows for the periods indicated (in thousands):
                        
 Quarter Ended January 31,  Quarter Ended April 30, Six Months Ended April 30, 
 2009 2010  2009 2010 2009 2010 
Net loss $(24,831) $(53,333) $(503,210) $(90,009) $(528,041) $(143,342)
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities, net of tax 1,766  (186)
Change in unrealized loss on derivative instruments, net of tax  (2,090)  
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities  (89)  (272) 1,677  (458)
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on foreign forward contracts 1,648   (442)  
Change in accumulated translation adjustments  (244)  (633) 251 98 7  (535)
              
Total comprehensive loss $(25,399) $(54,152) $(501,400) $(90,183) $(526,799) $(144,335)
              
(17)(19) SEGMENT AND ENTITY WIDE DISCLOSURES

27


Segment Reporting
     Effective upon the March 19, 2010 completion of Ciena’s acquisition of the MEN Business, Ciena reorganized its internal organizational structure and the management of its business. Ciena’s chief operating decision maker, its chief executive officer, evaluates performance and allocates resources based on multiple factors, including segment profit (loss) information for the following product categories:
Packet-Optical Transport— includes optical transport solutions that increase network capacity and enable delivery of a broader mix of high-bandwidth services. These products are used by network operators to facilitate the cost-effective and efficient transport of voice, video and data traffic in core networks, as well as regional, metro and access networks. Ciena’s principal products in this segment include its Optical Multiservice Edge 6500 (OME 6500); Optical Metro 5200 (OM 5200); CN 4200™ FlexSelect™ Advanced Services Platform and CoreStream® Agility Optical Transport System. This segment also includes Ciena’s legacy SONET/SDH products and legacy data networking products, as well as certain enterprise-oriented transport solutions that support storage and LAN extension, interconnection of data centers, and virtual private networks. This segment also includes sales of operating system software and enhanced software features embedded in each of these products.
Packet-Optical Switching —includes optical switching platforms that enable automated optical infrastructures for the delivery of a wide variety of enterprise and consumer-oriented network services. Ciena’s principal products in this segment include its CoreDirector® Multiservice Optical Switch; CoreDirector FS; and the 5430 Reconfigurable Switching System. These products include multiservice, multi-protocol switching systems that consolidate the functionality of an add/drop multiplexer, digital cross-connect and packet switch into a single, high-capacity intelligent switching system. These products address both the core and metro segments of communications networks and support key managed service services, Ethernet/TDM Private Line, Triple Play and IP services. This segment also includes sales of operating system software and enhanced software features embedded in each of these products.
Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery— includes service delivery and aggregation switches, as well as legacy broadband access products for residential services. These products support the access and aggregation tiers of communications networks and have principally been deployed to support wireless backhaul infrastructures and business data services. Employing sophisticated Carrier Ethernet switching technology, these products deliver quality of service capabilities, virtual local area networking and switching functions, and carrier-grade operations, administration and maintenance features. This segment includes the metro Ethernet routing switch (MERS) product line and Ciena’s legacy broadband products that transition legacy voice networks to support Internet-based (IP) telephony, video services and DSL. This segment also includes sales of operating system software and enhanced software features embedded in each of these products.
Software and Services— includes Ciena’s integrated network and service management software designed to automate and simplify network management and operation, while increasing network performance and functionality. These software solutions can track individual services across multiple product suites, facilitating planned network maintenance, outage detection and identification of customers or services affected by network troubles. This segment also includes a broad range of consulting and support services offered within the Ciena Specialist Services practice, which include installation and deployment, maintenance support, consulting, network design and training activities.
Reportable segment asset information is not disclosed because it is not reviewed by the chief operating decision maker for purposes of evaluating performance and allocating resources.
     The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth Ciena’s segment revenue, including the presentation of prior periods to reflect the change in reportable segments, for the respective periods:

28


                                 
  Quarter Ended April 30,  Six Months Ended April 30, 
  2009  %*  2010  %*  2009  %*  2010  %* 
Revenue:                                
Packet-Optical Transport $60,353   41.8  $97,689   38.5  $143,636   46.2  $181,159   42.2 
Packet-Optical Switching  42,681   29.6   32,434   12.8   87,338   28.0   55,832   13.0 
Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery  13,357   9.3   74,806   29.5   22,884   7.3   115,245   26.8 
Software and Services  27,810   19.3   48,542   19.2   57,743   18.5   77,111   18.0 
                             
Consolidated revenue $144,201   100.0  $253,471   100.0  $311,601   100.0  $429,347   100.0 
                             
*Denotes % of total revenue
Segment Profit (Loss)
     Segment profit (loss) is determined based on internal performance measures used by the chief executive officer to assess the performance of each operating segment in a given period. In connection with that assessment, the chief executive officer excludes the following items: selling and marketing costs; general and administrative costs; acquisition and integration costs; amortization of intangible assets; restructuring costs; goodwill impairment; interest and other income (net), interest expense, equity investment gains or losses, gains or losses on extinguishment of debt, and provisions (benefit) for income taxes.
     The table below (in thousands) sets forth Ciena’s segment profit (loss) and the reconciliation to consolidated net income (loss) including the presentation of prior periods to reflect the change in reportable operating segments during the respective periods:
                 
  Quarter Ended April 30,  Six Months Ended April 30, 
  2009  2010  2009  2010 
Segment profit (loss):                
Packet-Optical Transport $(3,548) $(6,595) $7,474  $13,528 
Packet-Optical Switching  14,559   5,467   32,882   3,429 
Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery  (4,295)  25,972   (14,898)  34,854 
Software and Services  4,522   8,956   10,923   12,116 
             
Total segment profit (loss)  11,238   33,800   36,381   63,927 
                 
Reconciling items:                
Selling and marketing  (33,295)  (45,328)  (67,114)  (79,565)
General and administrative  (12,615)  (21,503)  (24,200)  (34,266)
Acquisition and integration costs     (39,221)     (66,252)
Amortization of intangible assets  (6,224)  (17,121)  (12,628)  (23,102)
Restructuring costs  (6,399)  (1,849)  (6,475)  (1,828)
Goodwill impairment  (455,673)     (455,673)   
Interest and other financial charges, net  (914)  (365)  1,337   (2,966)
(Provision) benefit for income taxes  672   1,578   331   710 
             
Consolidated net loss $(503,210) $(90,009) $(528,041) $(143,342)
             
Entity Wide Reporting
     The following table reflects Ciena’s geographic distribution of revenue based on the location of the purchaser, with any country accounting for greater than 10% of total revenue in the period specifically identified. Revenue attributable to geographic regions outside of the United States and the United Kingdom is reflected as “Other International” revenue. For the periods below, Ciena’s geographic distribution of revenue was as follows (in thousands, except percentage data):

29


                                                
 Quarter Ended January 31,  Quarter Ended April 30, Six Months Ended April 30, 
 2009 % * 2010 % *  2009 %* 2010 %* 2009 %* 2010 %* 
United States $98,947 59.1 $123,912 70.4  $91,700 63.6 $180,523 71.2 $190,647 61.2 $304,435 70.9 
United Kingdom 26,717 16.0 18,590 10.6  18,581 12.9 n/a  45,298 14.5 n/a  
Other International 41,736 24.9 33,374 19.0  33,920 23.5 72,948 28.8 75,656 24.3 124,912 29.1 
                          
Total $167,400 100.0 $175,876 100.0  $144,201 100.0 $253,471 100.0 $311,601 100.0 $429,347 100.0 
                          
 
n/aDenotes revenue representing less than 10% of total revenue for the period
* Denotes % of total revenue
     The following table reflects Ciena’s geographic distribution of equipment, furniture and fixtures, with any country attributableaccounting for greater than 10% of total equipment, furniture and fixtures specifically identified. Equipment, furniture and fixtures attributable to geographic regions outside of the United States and Canada are reflected as “International.“Other International.” For the periods below, Ciena’s geographic distribution of equipment, furniture and fixtures was as follows (in thousands, except percentage data):
                                
 October 31, January 31,  October 31, April 30, 
 2009 % * 2010 % *  2009 %* 2010 %* 
United States $47,875 77.4 $48,780 75.8  $47,875 77.4 $56,553 51.0 
International 13,993 22.6 15,571 24.2 
Canada n/a  44,193 39.9 
Other International 13,993 22.6 10,139 9.1 
                  
Total $61,868 100.0 $64,351 100.0  $61,868 100.0 $110,885 100.0 
                  
 
n/aDenotes equipment, furniture and fixtures representing less than 10% of total equipment, furniture and fixtures
* Denotes % of total equipment, furniture and fixtures
     For the periods below, Ciena’s distribution of revenue was as follows (in thousands, except percentage data):
                 
  Quarter Ended January 31, 
  2009  % *  2010  % * 
Optical service delivery $130,191   77.8  $108,615   61.8 
Carrier Ethernet service delivery  9,526   5.7   40,439   22.9 
Global network services  27,683   16.5   26,822   15.3 
             
Total $167,400   100.0  $175,876   100.0 
             
*Denotes % of total revenue
     For the periods below, customers accounting for at least 10% of Ciena’s revenue were as follows (in thousands, except percentage data):

24


                                                
 Quarter Ended January 31,  Quarter Ended April 30, Six Months Ended April 30, 
 2009 % * 2010 % *  2009 %* 2010 %* 2009 %* 2010 %* 
Company A $32,556 19.4 $42,515 24.2  40,105 27.8 70,808 27.9 72,661 23.3 113,323 26.4 
Company B 18,877 11.3 n/a   n/a  36,531 14.4 n/a  51,867 12.1 
Company C 16,938 10.1 n/a   n/a  n/a  33,239 10.7 n/a  
                          
Total $68,371 40.8 $42,515 24.2  $40,105 27.8 $107,339 42.3 $105,900 34.0 $165,190 38.5 
                          
 
n/a Denotes revenue representing less than 10% of total revenue for the period
 
* Denotes % of total revenue
(18)(20) CONTINGENCIES
Foreign Tax Contingencies
     Ciena has received assessment notices from the Mexican tax authorities asserting deficiencies in payments between 2001 and 2005 related primarily to income taxes and import taxes and duties. Ciena has filed judicial petitions appealing these assessments. As of October 31, 2009 and January 31,April 30, 2010, Ciena had accrued liabilities of $1.1 million and $1.2$1.3 million, respectively, related to these contingencies, which are reported as a component of other current accrued liabilities. As of January 31,April 30, 2010, Ciena estimates that it could be exposed to possible losses of up to $5.8 million, for which it has not accrued liabilities. Ciena has not accrued the additional income tax liabilities because it does not believe that such losses are more likely than not to be incurred. Ciena has not accrued the additional import taxes and duties because it does not believe the incurrence of such losses are probable. Ciena continues to evaluate the likelihood of probable and reasonably possible losses, if any, related to these assessments. As a result, future increases or decreases to accrued liabilities may be necessary and will be recorded in the period when such amounts are estimable and more likely than not (for income taxes) or probable (for non-income taxes).
      In addition to the matters described above, Ciena is subject to various tax liabilities arising in the ordinary course of business. Ciena does not expect that the ultimate settlement of these liabilities will have a material effect on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

30


Litigation
     On May 29, 2008, Graywire, LLC filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia against Ciena and four other defendants, alleging, among other things, that certain of the parties’ products infringe U.S. Patent 6,542,673 (the “‘673 Patent”), relating to an identifier system and components for optical assemblies. The complaint, which seeks injunctive relief and damages, was served upon Ciena on January 20, 2009. Ciena filed an answer to the complaint and counterclaims against Graywire on March 26, 2009, and an amended answer and counterclaims on April 17, 2009. On April 27, 2009, Ciena and certain other defendants filed an application forinter partesreexamination of the ‘673 Patent with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (the “PTO”). On the same date, Ciena and the other defendants filed a motion to stay the case pending reexamination of all of the patents-in-suit. On July 17, 2009, the district court granted the defendants’ motion to stay the case. On July 23, 2009, the PTO granted the defendants’ application for reexamination with respect to certain claims of the ‘673 Patent. Ciena believes that it has valid defenses to the lawsuit and intends to defend it vigorously in the event the stay of the case is lifted.
     As a result of ourits June 2002 merger with ONI Systems Corp., Ciena became a defendant in a securities class action lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in August 2001. The complaint named ONI, certain former ONI officers, and certain underwriters of ONI’s initial public offering (IPO) as defendants, and alleges, among other things, that the underwriter defendants violated the securities laws by failing to disclose alleged compensation arrangements in ONI’s registration statement and by engaging in manipulative practices to artificially inflate ONI’s stock price after the IPO. The complaint also alleges that ONI and the named former officers violated the securities laws by failing to disclose the underwriters’ alleged compensation arrangements and manipulative practices. The former ONI officers have been dismissed from the action without prejudice. Similar complaints have been filed against more than 300 other issuers that have had initial public offerings since 1998, and all of these actions have been included in a single coordinated proceeding. On October 6, 2009, the Court entered an opinion granting final approval to a settlement among the plaintiffs, issuer defendants and underwriter defendants, and directing that the Clerk of the Court close these actions. Notices of appeal of the opinion granting final approval have been filed. A description of this litigation and the history of the proceedings can be found in “Item 3. Legal Proceedings” of Part I of Ciena’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 22, 2009. No specific amount of damages has been claimed in this action. Due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation and because the settlement remains subject to appeal, the ultimate outcome of the matter is uncertain.
     In addition to the matters described above, Ciena is subject to various legal proceedings, claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. Ciena does not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material effect on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

25


Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
     Some of the statements contained, or incorporated by reference, in this quarterly report discuss future events or expectations, contain projections of results of operations or financial condition, changes in the markets for our products and services, or state other “forward-looking” information. Ciena’s “forward-looking” information is based on various factors and was derived using numerous assumptions. In some cases, you can identify these “forward-looking statements” by words like “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential” or “continue” or the negative of those words and other comparable words. You should be aware that these statements only reflect our current predictions and beliefs. These statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, and actual events or results may differ materially. Important factors that could cause our actual results to be materially different from the forward-looking statements are disclosed throughout this report, particularly in Item 1A “Risk Factors” of Part II of this report below. You should review these risk factors and the rest of this quarterly report in combination with the more detailed description of our business and management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition in our annual report onForm 10-K, which we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 22, 2009, for a more complete understanding of the risks associated with an investment in Ciena’s securities. Ciena undertakes no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements.
Overview
     We are a provider of communications networking equipment, software and services that support the transport, switching, aggregation and management of voice, video and data traffic. Our optical service deliveryPacket-Optical Transport, a Packet-Optical Switching and carrierCarrier Ethernet service deliveryService Delivery products are used, individually or as part of an integrated solution, in networks operated by communications service providers, cable

31


operators, governments and enterprises around the globe.
     We are a network specialist targeting the transition of disparate, legacy communications networks to converged, next-generation architectures, better able to handle increased traffic volumes and deliver more efficiently a broader mix of high-bandwidth communications services.services at a lower cost. Our products, withthrough their embedded network element software and our unifiednetwork service and transport management software suites, enable service providersnetwork operators to efficiently and cost-effectively deliver critical enterprise and consumer-oriented communication services. Together with our professional support and consulting services, our product offerings seek to offer solutionsenable software-defined, automated networks that address the business challenges, communications infrastructure requirements and networkservice needs of our customers. Our customers face an increasingly challenging and rapidly changing environment. This environment requires that requires themour customers’ networks be able to address growing capacity needs and quickly adapt theirto execute new business strategies and deliver new,support the delivery of innovative revenue-creating services. By improving network productivity and automation, reducing operating costs and providing the flexibility to enable new and integrated service offerings, our equipment, software and services solutions create business and operational value for our customers.
     Our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, annual reports on Form 10-K and current reports on Form 8-K filed with the SEC are available through the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov or free of charge on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we file these documents. We routinely post the reports above, recent news and announcements, financial results and other important information about Ciena on our website atwww.ciena.com.www.ciena.com.
Pending Acquisition of Nortel Metro Ethernet Networks (“MEN”Business (the “MEN Acquisition”) Assets
     We believe thatOn March 19, 2010, we completed our pending acquisition of substantially all of the optical networking and carrierCarrier Ethernet assets of Nortel’s Metro Ethernet Networks business (“MEN”(the “MEN Business”) will accelerate. The $773.8 million aggregate purchase price for the executionMEN Acquisition consisted entirely of our corporate and research and development strategies, and will create a leader in next-generation, converged optical Ethernet networks. We expect this pending transactioncash, with the final amount subject to close inadjustment based upon the first calendar quarteramount of 2010.
     Following our emergence asnet working capital transferred to us at closing. The purchase price was decreased at closing by approximately $62.0 million based on the winning bidder in the bankruptcy auction, we agreed to acquire substantially allestimated working capital delivered at closing. As of the optical networking and carrier Ethernet assetsdate of Nortel’sthis report, Ciena estimates that the purchase price adjustment will further decrease the aggregate purchase price by up to an additional $18.7 million, subject to finalization between the parties. In accordance with the terms of the MEN business for $530 million in cash and $239Acquisition, prior to closing, we elected to replace the $239.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 6% Senior Convertibleconvertible notes due 2017. The termsthat were to be issued to Nortel as part of the purchase price with cash equivalent to 102% of the face amount of the notes replaced, or $243.8 million. See “Private Placement of $375 Million in Convertible Notes” below for more information on the source of funds for this payment election and the purchase price.
Rationale for MEN Acquisition
     The MEN Business that we acquired is a leading provider of next-generation, communications network equipment, with a significant global installed base and a strong technology heritage. The MEN Business is a leader in high-capacity 40G and 100G coherent optical transport technology that enables network operators to be issued upon closing are set forthseamlessly upgrade their existing 2.5G and 10G networks, thereby enabling a significant increase in Note 3 ofnetwork capacity without the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements found under Item 1 of Part I of this report. Nortel’sneed for new fiber deployments or complex re-engineering. The product and technology assets to bethat we acquired include:
  long-haul optical transport portfolio;
 
  metro optical Ethernet switching and transport solutions;
 
  Ethernet transport, aggregation and switching technology;
 
  multiservice SONET/SDH product families; and
 
  network management software products; and
network implementation and support services.products.

26


     The pending acquisition encompasses a business that is a leading provider of next-generation, 40G and 100G optical transport technology with a significant, global installed base. The acquired transport technology allows network operators to upgrade their existing 10G networks to 40G capability, quadrupling capacity without the need for new fiber deployments or complex network re-engineering. In addition to transport capability,these hardware and software solutions, we also acquired the optical platforms acquired include traffic switchingnetwork implementation and aggregation capability for traditional protocols such as SONET/SDH as well as newer packet protocols such as Ethernet. A suite of software products usedsupport service resources related to manage networks built from these technologies is also part of the transaction.MEN Business.
     We believe that the MEN Acquisition represents a transformative opportunity for Ciena. We believe that this transaction provides an opportunity to significantly transform Ciena and strengthenstrengthens our position as a leader in next-generation, converged optical Ethernet networking.networking and will accelerate the execution of our corporate and research and development strategies. We believe that the additional resources, expanded geographic reach, new and broaderexpanded customer relationships, and deeperbroader portfolio of complementary network solutions derived from the transactionMEN Acquisition will augment Ciena’s growth.and accelerate the growth of our business. We also expect that the transaction will add desired scale to our business, enable increased operating model synergiesleverage and provide an opportunity to optimize our research and development investment.investment toward next-generation technologies and product platforms. We expect thesebelieve that the benefits of the this

32


transaction will help Ciena tous better compete with traditional, larger network equipment vendors.
     DueIntegration Activities and Expense
     We have made considerable progress to date on integration-related activities in connection with the relative scaleMEN Acquisition including the substantial completion of its operations,our organizational structure, sales coverage plans, decisions on the rationalization of our combined product portfolio and, as described in “Restructuring Activities” below, the realization of initial operating synergies from the MEN Acquisition. Significant additional integration efforts remain, however, including the rationalization of our supply chain, third party manufacturers and facilities, the execution of our combined product and software development plan, and the reduced reliance upon closing,and winding down of transition services. Given the incorporationmagnitude of the MEN assets will significantly transform Ciena’s businessAcquisition and will materially affect our operations, financial results and liquidity, which may make period to period comparisons difficult. By way of example, we expect our revenue and operating expense to significantly increase following the closing. The assets to be acquired generated approximately $798 million in the first nine months of Nortel’s fiscal 2009. The global scale of our operations will increase significantly as a result of this transaction. Upon the closing we will hire approximately 2,000 Nortel employees, nearly doubling our headcount and expanding the global presence of Ciena’s team of network specialists.
     Given theits structure of the transaction as an asset carve-out from Nortel, we expect that the transactionintegration of the MEN Business will result in abe costly and complex, integration with a number of operational risks. We expect to incur acquisition and integrationintegration-related costs of approximately $180 million, with the majority of these costs to be incurred in the first 12 months following the completion of the transaction.fiscal 2010. This estimate principally reflects expensecosts associated with equipment and information technology, costs, transaction expense, severance expense and consulting and third party service fees associated with integration. This amount does not give effectIn addition to any expensethese integration costs, Ciena has incurred inventory obsolescence charges and may incur additional expenses related to, among other things, facilities restructuring or inventory obsolescence charges.restructuring. As a result, the integration expense we incur and recognize for financial statement purposes couldas a result of the MEN Acquisition will be significantly higher. As of January 31,April 30, 2010, we have incurred $27.0$66.3 million in transaction, consulting and third party service fees, $1.9 million in severance expense, and $2.3an additional $2.4 million, primarily related to purchases of capitalized information technology equipment. Any material delays in integrating the MEN Business or additional, unanticipated additional expense may harm our business and results of operations.
     In addition to thesethe integration costs above, we also expect to incur significant transition services expense, and we will relyexpense. We are currently relying upon an affiliate of Nortel to perform certain critical operational and business support functions on our behalf during an interim integration period that will continue until we can perform these services ourselves or locate another provider. These support services include key finance and accounting functions, supply chain and logistics management, maintenance and product support services, order management and fulfillment, trade compliance, and information technology services. We can utilize certain of these support services for a period of up to 24 months following closing notthe MEN Acquisition (12 months in EMEA). These services are estimated to exceed two years.be approximately $94 million should we utilize all of the transition services for a full year. The actual expense we incur will depend upon the scope of the services that we utilize and the time within which we are able to complete the planned transfer of these services to internal resources or other third party providers. We expect to incur additional costs as we simultaneously build up internal resources, including headcount, facilities and information systems, or engage third party providers, while we rely upon and transition away from these transition support services. The wind down and transfer of critical transition services is a complex undertaking and may be disruptive to our business and operations.
Effect of MEN Acquisition upon Results of Operations and Financial Condition
     Due to the relative scale of the operations of the MEN Business, we expect the MEN Acquisition will materially affect our operations, financial results and liquidity.
     We expect our revenue and operating expense to increase in future periods materially as compared to periods prior to the acquisition. Although the acquired assets generated approximately $1.1 billion in revenue during Nortel’s fiscal 2009, the performance and financial contribution of MEN Business we acquired, are subject to a number of factors, some of which are outside of our control. These factors include overall market conditions, the level of competition for sales of Packet-Optical Transport Products, and customer receptivity to Ciena, particularly in international jurisdictions, where the effect of Nortel’s bankruptcy proceedings have had a more pronounced negative impact on the MEN Business. In addition, these result of operations may be adversely affected by our product portfolio decisions affecting legacy products of the business. Similarly, our operating expense will increase significantly, reflecting the increase in the global scale of our operations, the addition of approximately 2,000 employees of the MEN Business and the additional expense resulting from the MEN Acquisition noted above. These and other effects on our financial statements described below and elsewhere in this report may make period to period comparisons difficult.
     As a result of the acquisition and the accounting for the transaction,MEN Acquisition, we may also recordrecorded $40.0 million in goodwill and expect to record$489.7 million in other intangible assets that will be amortized over their useful lives.lives and increase our operating expense. See “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates- Goodwill” and “-Intangibles” below for information relating to these items. Under purchaseacquisition accounting rules, we also expect to revaluerevalued the acquired finished goods inventory of the MEN Business to fair value at the time of the acquisition.upon closing. This revaluation may increaseincreased marketable inventory carrying value by approximately $40.7 million. Of this amount, we recognized $11.1 million as an increase in cost of goods sold during the second quarter of fiscal 2010, with the balance expected to be recognized during the remainder of fiscal 2010. See Note 3 of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements found under Item 1 of Part I of this report.

33


     Our use of cash to fund the purchase price for the MEN Business, and adversely affect our product gross marginprivate placement of a new issue of convertible debt in March 2010, have changed our liquidity position significantly, resulting in additional indebtedness and materially reducing our cash and investment balance. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below and Note 15 of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements found under Item 1 of Part I of this report for more information regarding the convertible notes.
     We reorganized our internal organizational structure and the management of our business upon the MEN Acquisition, and as described in Note 19 of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements found under Item 1 of Part I of this report, presents is results of operations based upon the following operating segments: (i) Packet-Optical Transport; (ii) Packet-Optical Switching; (iii) Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery; and (iv) Software and Services.
Private Placement of $375 Million in Convertible Notes to Fund Purchase Price
     On March 15, 2010, we completed a private offering of $375.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.0% Convertible Senior Notes due March 15, 2015. The net proceeds from the offering were $364.3 million after deducting the placement agents’ fees and other fees and expenses. We used $243.8 million of the net proceeds to replace the contractual obligation to issue convertible notes to Nortel as part of the purchase price for the MEN Acquisition. The remaining proceeds were used to reduce the cash on hand required to fund the aggregate purchase price of the MEN Acquisition. See Note 15 of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements found under Item 1 of Part I of this report for more information regarding the convertible notes.
Restructuring Activities
     In April 2010, we took action to effect a headcount reduction of approximately 70 employees, with reductions principally affecting our Global Product Group and Global Field Organization outside of the Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) region. This action resulted in a restructuring charge of $1.9 in the second quarter of fiscal 2010. In May 2010, following the end of our fiscal second quarter, we informed employees of our proposal to reorganize and restructure portions of Ciena’s business and operations in the EMEA region. We anticipate reductions to our workforce in EMEA of approximately 120 to 140 positions in the near term.term with reductions expected to principally affect employees in Ciena’s Global Field Organization and Global Supply Chain organization. Execution of any specific reorganization is subject to local legal requirements, including notification and consultation processes with employees and employee representatives. We estimate completing the reorganization by August 31, 2010. These actions are intended to reduce operating expense and better align Ciena’s workforce and operating costs with market and business opportunities following the completion of our MEN Acquisition. As we look to manage operating expense and complete integration activities for the combined operations, we will continue to assess the allocation of our headcount and other resources toward key growth opportunities for our business and evaluate additional cost reduction measures.
Effect of Global Market Conditions and Competitive Landscape
     If the closing does not take place on or before April 30, 2010, the applicable asset sale agreements may be terminated by either party. Ciena has been granted early terminationWhile we continue to experience cautious spending among our customers as a result of the antitrust waiting periods under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act and the Canadian Competition Act and has received approvalrecent period of the transaction under the Investment Canada Act. On December 2, 2009, the bankruptcy courtseconomic weakness, we have started to see indications from our business that market conditions in North America are steadily improving. We are seeing similar indications of improvement in the U.S.Asia-Pacific and Canada approved the asset sale agreement relating to Ciena’s acquisition of substantially all of the North American, Caribbean and Latin American regions, albeit at a slower rate of recovery. We continue to experience depressed demand and Asian optical networkinglower customer spending in Europe, however, as economic uncertainty and carrier Ethernet assetsvolatile macroeconomic conditions persist. We remain uncertain as to how long these macroeconomic and industry conditions will continue, the pace of Nortel’s MEN business. Completionany recovery, and the magnitude of the transaction remains subject to information and consultation with employee representatives and employees in certain international jurisdictions and customary closing conditions.
     As a resulteffect of the aggregate consideration to be paid as described above, we will incur significant additional indebtedness and will materially reduce our existing cash balance. Except where specifically indicated, the discussion in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” does not give effect to the possible consummation of this pending transaction and the effectrecent market conditions on our business and results of operations.
Effect of Decline     Coupled with weaker macroeconomic conditions, in Market Conditions
     Our results of operations for the first quarter of fiscal 2010 reflect the sustained weakness and uncertainty presented by the global market conditions. In recent quarters, our business has experienced the effects of cautious spending by our largest customers, as they have sought to conserve capital, reduce debt or address uncertainties or changes in their own business models brought on by these broader market challenges. As a result,years we have experienced lower demand, lengthening sales cycles, customer delays in network build-outs, slowing deployments and deferral of new technology adoption. We have also experiencedencountered an increasingly competitive marketplace andwith a heightened customer focus on pricing and return on network investment. WhilePricing pressure has been most severe in connection with our Packet-Optical Transport platforms, which we expect to comprise a greater percentage of our revenue as a result of the MEN Acquisition. Competition is particularly intense in attracting large carrier customers and securing new sales opportunities with existing carrier customers. We have encountered increased competition from larger vendors, including Chinese manufacturers, as well as smaller companies seeking to capture market share. As a result of this competitive landscape, and an effort to retain or secure customers and capture market share, in the past we have startedand in the future may agree to see some indicationspricing or other terms that conditionsresult in North America may be improving,negative gross margins on a particular order or group of orders. These arrangements would adversely affect our gross margins and result of operations. We expect that our increased market share, technology leadership and global presence following the MEN Acquisition will only increase the level of competition that we remain uncertainface as competitors seek to how long these unfavorable macroeconomicsecure market share and industry conditions will persist and the magnitude of their effects on our business and results of operations.gain an incumbent position with network operators.

27


Financial Results

34


     Our results of operations for the second quarter and six-month period ended April 30, 2010 reflect the operations of the MEN Business beginning on the March 19, 2010 acquisition date.
     Revenue for the firstsecond quarter of fiscal 2010 was $175.9$253.5 million, representing a 0.2%44.1% sequential decrease from $176.3 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 and a 5.1% increase from $167.4$175.9 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2009.2010. This increase reflects $53.5 million in revenue from the MEN Business and an increase of $24.1 million related to Ciena’s pre-acquisition portfolio. Additional sequential revenue-related details include:
  Product revenue for the firstsecond quarter of fiscal 2010 increased by $57.4 million. This increase reflects a $10.9$37.8 million sequential decrease in optical service delivery revenue, primarily reflecting decreasedinitial sales of core transport products from the MEN Business and a $10.9an increase of $19.6 million sequential increase in carriersales of Ciena’s pre-acquisition products. Carrier Ethernet service deliveryService Delivery revenue increased by $34.4 million, principally related to sales of switching and aggregation products in support of wireless backhaul deployments;deployments. Packet-Optical Transport revenue increased by $14.2 million, reflecting $35.4 million in initial sales of products from the MEN Business, partially offset by a decrease of $21.2 million in Ciena’s pre-acquisition Packet-Optical Transport products. Sales of Packet-Optical Switching products increased by $9.0 million.
Service revenue for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 increased by $20.2 million, reflecting $15.7 million in service revenue from the MEN Business and a $4.5 million increase in sales of Ciena’s pre-acquisition service offerings.
 
  Revenue from the U.S. for the firstsecond quarter of fiscal 2010 was $123.9$180.5 million, a slight decrease from $124.7 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 and an increase from $98.9$123.9 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2009;2010. This increase reflects $27.1 million in sales of products and services from the MEN Business and an increase of $29.5 million in sales of Ciena’s pre-acquisition portfolio.
 
  International revenue for the firstsecond quarter of fiscal 2010 was $52.0$73.0 million, a slightan increase from $51.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2009 and a decrease from $68.5$52.0 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2009;2010. This increase reflects $26.4 million in sales of products and services from the MEN Business and partially offset by a decrease of $5.4 million in sales of Ciena’s pre-acquisition portfolio.
 
  As a percentage of revenue, international revenue was 29.6%28.8% during the firstsecond quarter of fiscal 2010, roughly flat with 29.2% in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 and down from 40.9%29.6% in the first quarter of fiscal 2009; and2010. As a percentage of Ciena’s pre-acquisition portfolio revenue, the portion attributable to international revenue comprised 23.3%.
 
  For the firstsecond quarter of fiscal 2010, one customertwo customers each accounted for 24.2%greater than 10% of revenue.revenue and 42.3% in the aggregate. This compares to one customer that accounted for 18.5%24.2% of revenue in the fourthfirst quarter of fiscal 2009.2010.
     Gross margin for the firstsecond quarter of fiscal 2010 was 45.6%41.4%, updown from 44.0% in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, and 42.9%45.6% in the first quarter of fiscal 2009.2010. Gross margin for the second quarter was adversely affected by a number items relating to the MEN Acquisition that increased costs of goods sold. These items include the revaluation of inventory described above, higher than typical excess and obsolete inventory charges and excess purchase commitment losses relating to Ciena’s pre-acquisition inventory and stemming from product rationalization decisions, and increased amortization of intangible assets. We expect gross margin to decline further during the third quarter of fiscal 2010, as a result of some of these items above and expectations as to product and customer mix including the effect of a full quarter of product revenue for the MEN Business, which has carried a somewhat lower gross margin than Ciena’s pre-acquisition portfolio. Going forward, we also expect gross margin to be negatively affected by our increased percentage of Packet-Optical Transport product revenue as a result of the MEN Acquisition.
     OperatingReflecting the completion of the MEN Acquisition, operating expense was $196.2 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2010, an increase from $130.0 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 was $130.0 million, an increase from $104.2 million in the fourth quarter2010. Operating expense for our first and second quarters of fiscal 20092010 include $27.0 million and $98.6$39.2 million, for the first quarter of fiscal 2009. First quarter fiscal 2010 operating expense includes $27.0 millionrespectively, in acquisition and integration relatedintegration-related costs related toassociated with the pending acquisition of Nortel’s MEN business. We expect operating expense, particularly the portions attributable to acquisition and integration related expense and research and development expense, to increase from the first quarter of fiscal 2010 as we continue to integrate the Nortel MEN assets and fund strategic technology initiatives including:
Data-optimized switching solutions and evolution of our CoreDirector family and 5400 family of reconfigurable switching solutions;
Extending and increasing capacity of our converged optical transport service delivery portfolio, including 100G transport technologies and capabilities;
Expanding our carrier Ethernet service delivery portfolio, including larger Ethernet aggregation switches; and
Extending the value of our network management software platform across our product portfolio.
Acquisition.
     Our loss from operations for the firstsecond quarter of fiscal 2010 was $49.9$91.2 million. This compares to a $26.6$49.9 million loss from operations during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 and a $26.7 million loss from operations for the first quarter of fiscal 2009.2010. Our net loss for the firstsecond quarter of fiscal 2010 was $53.3$90.0 million, or $0.58$0.97 per share. This compares to a net loss of $26.7$53.3 million, or $0.29$0.58 per share, for the fourthfirst quarter of fiscal 2009.2010.
     We generated $4.5used $77.7 million in cash from operations during the second quarter of fiscal 2010, consisting of a use of cash of $41.8 million from net losses (adjusted for non-cash charges) and a use of cash of $35.9 million from changes in working capital. Use of cash above reflects cash payments of $38.0 million associated with acquisition and integration-related expense. This compares with cash generated from operations of $4.5 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010, consisting of a use of cash of $26.7 million in cash from net incomelosses (adjusted for non-cash charges) and cash generated of $31.2 million from changes in working capital. This compares with cash generated from operations of $1.9 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, consisting of $4.8 million in cash generated from net income (adjusted for non-cash charges) and a use of cash of $2.9 million from changes in working capital.
     At January 31,April 30, 2010, we had $573.2$584.2 million in cash and cash equivalents and $428.2$29.5 million of short-term investments in marketable debt securities.
     As of January 31, 2010, headcount was 2,197, an increase from 2,163 at October 31, 2009 and a decrease from 2,238 at January 31, 2009.

2835


     As of April 30, 2010, headcount was 4,157, an increase from 2,197 at January 31, 2010 and 2,104 at April 30, 2009.
Consolidated Results of Operations
     Our results of operations for the second quarter and six-month period ended April 30, 2010 reflect the operations of the MEN Business beginning on the March 19, 2010 acquisition date.
Revenue
     We derive revenue from sales of our products and services, which we discussRevenue is discussed in the following three majorproduct and service groupings:
 1. Optical Service DeliveryPacket-Optical Transport. Included inThis product revenue, this revenue grouping, aligned with our Packet-Optical Transport operating segment, reflects sales of our optical transport products including the following products acquired from the MEN Business: Optical Multiservice Edge 6500 (OME 6500); Optical Multiservice Edge 6110 (OME 6110); Optical Metro 5200 (OM5200); Optical Multiservice Edge 1000 series; and switchingOptical Metro 3500 (OM 3500). It includes sales of our CN 4200™ FlexSelect™ Advanced Services Platform and our Corestream® Agility Optical Transport System. This group also includes sales from legacy SONET/SDH products and legacy data networking products, as well as certain enterprise-oriented transport solutions that support storage and related software. This revenueLAN extension, interconnection of data centers, and virtual private networks. Revenue for this grouping was previously referred to as our “converged Ethernet infrastructure” products.also includes the operating system software and enhanced software features embedded in each of the products above.
 
 2. Packet-Optical Switching.This product grouping, aligned with our Packet-Optical Switching operating segment, reflects sales of our CoreDirector® Multiservice Optical Switch; CoreDirector-FS, an expansion of our CoreDirector platform that delivers substantial new hardware and software features; and our 5430 Reconfigurable Switching System. Revenue for this grouping also includes the operating system software and enhanced software features embedded in each of the products above.
3.Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery. Included inThis product revenue, this revenue grouping, aligned with our Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery operating segment, reflects sales of our service delivery and aggregation switches, metro Ethernet routing switch (MERS) product line broadband access products, and the related software.operating system software and enhanced software features embedded in these products.
 
 3.4. GlobalUnified Service and Network Management Software. This product grouping, aligned with our Software and Services operating segment, reflects sales of ON-Center® Network & Service Management Suite, our integrated network and service management software designed to simplify network management and operation across our portfolio. It also includes revenue from the Preside and OMEA software platforms acquired from the MEN Business.
5.Services. Included in services revenue areThis service grouping, aligned with our Software and Services operating segment, includes sales of installation and deployment services, maintenance support, consulting services and training activities.
     A sizable portion of our revenue continues to comecomes from sales to a small number of communications service providers. As a result,While the MEN Acquisition may reduce our revenues areconcentration of revenue somewhat, our revenue remains closely tied to the prospects, performance, and financial condition of our largest customers andcustomers. As a result, our results are significantly affected by market-wide changes, including reductions in enterprise and consumer spending thatand adoption of broadband services, which affect the businesses and level of network infrastructure-related spending by communications service providers. Our contracts do not have terms that obligate these customers to purchase any minimum or specific amounts of equipment or services. Because theircustomer spending may be unpredictable and sporadic, and their purchases may result in the recognition or deferral of significant amounts of revenue in a given quarter, our revenue can fluctuate on a quarterly basis.
     Our concentration of revenue increases the risk of quarterly fluctuations in revenue and operating results and can exacerbate our exposure to reductions in spending or changes in network strategy involving one or more of our significant customers. Our concentration of revenue can be adversely affected by consolidation activity among our large customers. In particular,addition, some of our customers are pursuing efforts to outsource the management and operation of their networks, or have indicated a procurement strategy to reduce the number of vendors from which they purchase equipment.
     Given current market conditions In April 2010, we were selected as a domain network equipment supplier by AT&T for its optical transport network and the effect of lower demand in prior periods, as well as changes in the mixmetro and core transport domains. AT&T represented approximately 19.6% of our revenue toward productsin fiscal 2009 and was a major customer of the

36


MEN Business. There can be no assurance that this program, intended to facilitate a more collaborative technology relationship with shorter customer lead times, the percentagevendors like Ciena, will not adversely affect our concentration of our quarterly revenue relating to orders placed in that quarter has increased in comparison to prior fiscal years. Lower levels of backlog orders and an increase in the percentage of quarterly revenue relating to orders placed in that quarter could result in more variability and less predictability in our quarterly results.revenue.
Cost of Goods Sold
     Product cost of goods sold consists primarily of amounts paid to third-party contract manufacturers, component costs, direct compensation costs and overhead, shipping and logistics costs associated with manufacturing-related operations, warranty and other contractual obligations, royalties, license fees, amortization of intangible assets and the cost of excess and obsolete inventory and, when applicable, estimated losses on committed customer contracts.inventory.
     Services cost of goods sold consists primarily of direct and third-party costs, including personnel costs, associated with provision of services including installation, deployment, maintenance support, consulting and training activities, and, when applicable, estimated losses on committed customer contracts.
Gross Margin
     Gross margin continues to be susceptible to quarterly fluctuation due to a number of factors. Product gross margin can vary significantly depending upon the mix of products and customers in a given fiscal quarter. Gross margin can also be affected by volume of orders, our ability to drive product cost reductions, geographic mix, the competitive environment and level of pricing pressure we encounter, our introduction of new products, or entry into new markets, charges for excess and obsolete inventory and changes in warranty costs. Our gross margins have also been adversely affected in the past due to estimated losses on committed customer contracts when entering a new market or securing a new customer and may be affected by future efforts to capture market share. Gross margins, in the near term, will be adversely affected by the revaluation of the acquired MEN Business inventory described above. Gross margins will also be affected by our level of success in driving cost reductions and rationalizing our supply chain and third party contract manufacturers as part of the integration following the MEN Acquisition.
     Service gross margin can be affected by the mix of customers and services, particularly the mix between deployment and maintenance services, geographic mix and the timing and extent of any investments in internal resources to support this business.
Operating Expense
     Research and development expense primarily consists of salaries and related employee expense (including share-based compensation expense), prototype costs relating to design, development, testing of our products, depreciation expense and third-party consulting costs.
     Sales and marketing expense primarily consists of salaries, commissions and related employee expense (including share-based compensation expense), and sales and marketing support expense, including travel, demonstration units, trade show expense, and third-party consulting costs.

29


     General and administrative expense primarily consists of salaries and related employee expense (including share-based compensation expense), and costs for third-party consulting and other services.
     Amortization of intangible assets primarily reflects purchased technology and customer relationships from our acquisitions.
Quarter ended January 31,April 30, 2009 compared to the quarter ended January 31,April 30, 2010
Revenue, cost of goods sold and gross profit
     The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in revenue, cost of goods sold and gross profit for the periods indicated:

37


                                                
 Quarter Ended January 31, Increase    Quarter Ended April 30,     
 2009 % * 2010 % * (decrease) %**  Increase   
Revenues: 
 2009 %* 2010 %* (decrease) %** 
Revenue: 
Products $139,717 83.5 $149,054 84.7 $9,337 6.7  $118,849 82.4 $206,420 81.4 $87,571 73.7 
Services 27,683 16.5 26,822 15.3  (861)  (3.1) 25,352 17.6 47,051 18.6 21,699 85.6 
                        
Total revenue 167,400 100.0 175,876 100.0 8,476 5.1  144,201 100.0 253,471 100.0 109,270 75.8 
                        
Costs:  
Products 76,367 45.6 76,669 43.6 302 0.4  65,419 45.4 118,221 46.6 52,802 80.7 
Services 19,190 11.5 19,047 10.8  (143)  (0.7) 18,062 12.5 30,308 12.0 12,246 67.8 
                        
Total cost of goods sold 95,557 57.1 95,716 54.4 159 0.2  83,481 57.9 148,529 58.6 65,048 77.9 
                        
Gross profit $71,843 42.9 $80,160 45.6 $8,317 11.6  $60,720 42.1 $104,942 41.4 $44,222 72.8 
                        
 
* Denotes % of total revenue
 
** Denotes % change from 2009 to 2010
     The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in product revenue, product cost of goods sold and product gross profit for the periods indicated:
                        
                         Quarter Ended April 30,     
 Quarter Ended January 31, Increase    Increase   
 2009 % * 2010 % * (decrease) %**  2009 %* 2010 %* (decrease) %** 
Product revenue $139,717 100.0 $149,054 100.0 $9,337 6.7  $118,849 100.0 $206,420 100.0 $87,571 73.7 
Product cost of goods sold 76,367 54.7 76,669 51.4 302 0.4  65,419 55.0 118,221 57.3 52,802 80.7 
                      
Product gross profit $63,350 45.3 $72,385 48.6 $9,035 14.3  $53,430 45.0 $88,199 42.7 $34,769 65.1 
                      
 
* Denotes % of product revenue
 
** Denotes % change from 2009 to 2010
     The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in services revenue, services cost of goods sold and services gross profit for the periods indicated:
                        
                         Quarter Ended April 30,     
 Quarter Ended January 31, Increase    Increase   
 2009 %* 2010 %* (decrease) %**  2009 %* 2010 %* (decrease) %** 
Services revenue $27,683 100.0 $26,822 100.0 $(861)  (3.1) $25,352 100.0 $47,051 100.0 $21,699 85.6 
Services cost of goods sold 19,190 69.3 19,047 71.0  (143)  (0.7) 18,062 71.2 30,308 64.4 12,246 67.8 
                      
Services gross profit $8,493 30.7 $7,775 29.0 $(718)  (8.5) $7,290 28.8 $16,743 35.6 $9,453 129.7 
                      
 
* Denotes % of services revenue
**Denotes % change from 2009 to 2010

30


     The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in distribution of revenue for the periods indicated:
                         
  Quarter Ended January 31,  Increase    
  2009  % *  2010  % *  (decrease)  %** 
Optical service delivery $130,191   77.8  $108,615   61.8  $(21,576)  (16.6)
Carrier Ethernet service delivery  9,526   5.7   40,439   22.9   30,913   324.5 
Global network services  27,683   16.5   26,822   15.3   (861)  (3.1)
                    
Total $167,400   100.0  $175,876   100.0  $8,476   5.1 
                    
*Denotes % of total revenue
 
** Denotes % change from 2009 to 2010
     Revenue from sales to customers based outside of the United States is reflected as “International” in the geographic distribution of revenue below. The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in geographic distribution of revenue for the periods indicated:
                        
                         Quarter Ended April 30,     
 Quarter Ended January 31, Increase    Increase   
 2009 % * 2010 % * (decrease) %**  2009 %* 2010 %* (decrease) %** 
United States $98,947 59.1 $123,912 70.4 $24,965 25.2  $91,700 63.6 $180,523 71.2 $88,823 96.9 
International 68,453 40.9 51,964 29.6  (16,489)  (24.1) 52,501 36.4 72,948 28.8 20,447 38.9 
                      
Total $167,400 100.0 $175,876 100.0 $8,476 5.1  $144,201 100.0 $253,471 100.0 $109,270 75.8 
                      
*Denotes % of total revenue
**Denotes % change from 2009 to 2010

38


     Certain customers each accounted for at least 10% of our revenue for the periods indicated (in thousands, except percentage data) as follows:
                 
  Quarter Ended April 30, 
  2009  %*  2010  %* 
Company A $40,105   27.8  $70,808   27.9 
Company B  n/a      36,531   14.4 
             
Total $40,105   27.8  $107,339   42.3 
             
n/aDenotes revenue recognized less than 10% of total revenue for the period
*Denotes % of total revenue
Revenue
Product revenueincreased due to a $61.4 million increase in sales of our Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery products, principally related to sales of switching and aggregation products in support of wireless backhaul deployments, and a $37.3 million increase of Packet-Optical Transport revenue. The increase in Packet-Optical Transport revenue reflects the addition of $16.2 million related to our OME 6500 and $14.2 million related to OM 5200 from the MEN Business, as well as an $11.0 million increase in sales of CN 4200. These increases offset a $10.2 million decrease in Packet-Optical Switching revenue.
Services revenueincreased primarily due to the addition of $13.6 million in maintenance support revenue from the MEN Business, a $4.4 million increase in installation and deployment services and a $3.1 million increase in professional services.
United States revenueincreased primarily due to a $60.2 million increase in sales of Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery products and a $21.5 million increase in Packet-Optical Transport revenue. These increases offset an $8.2 million decrease in Packet-Optical Switching revenue.
International revenueincreased primarily due to a $15.8 million increase in Packet-Optical Transport revenue, primarily reflecting the addition of sales of Packet-Optical Transport products of the MEN Business.
Gross profit
Gross profit as a percentage of revenuedecreased due to lower product gross margins described below, partially offset by improved service gross margin.
Gross profit on products as a percentage of product revenuedecreased due to a number of items relating to the MEN Acquisition that increased costs of goods sold. These items include the revaluation of inventory described in “Overview” above, higher than typical excess and obsolete inventory charges and excess purchase commitment losses on Ciena’s pre-acquisition inventory relating to product rationalization decisions, and increased amortization of intangible assets. Gross margin for the second quarter of fiscal 2009 was negatively affected by charges of approximately $5.8 million related to two committed customer sales contracts that result in a negative gross margin on the initial phases of the customers’ deployment.
Gross profit on services as a percentage of services revenueincreased due to higher concentration of maintenance support and professional services as a percentage of revenue.
Operating expense
     Increased operating expenses for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 reflect, principally, the acquisition of the MEN Business on March 19, 2010. The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in operating expense for the periods indicated:

39


                         
  Quarter Ended April 30,       
                  Increase    
  2009  %*  2010  %*  (decrease)  %** 
Research and development $49,482   34.3  $71,142   28.1  $21,660   43.8 
Selling and marketing  33,295   23.1   45,328   17.9   12,033   36.1 
General and administrative  12,615   8.7   21,503   8.5   8,888   70.5 
Acquisition and integration costs     0.0   39,221   15.5   39,221   100.0 
Amortization of intangible assets  6,224   4.3   17,121   6.8   10,897   175.1 
Restructuring costs  6,399   4.4   1,849   0.7   (4,550)  (71.1)
Goodwill impairment  455,673   316.0      0.0   (455,673)  (100.0)
                    
Total operating expense $563,688   390.8  $196,164   77.5  $(367,524)  (65.2)
                    
*Denotes % of total revenue
**Denotes % change from 2009 to 2010
Research and developmentexpense was negatively affected by $5.2 million in foreign exchange rates, primarily due to the weakening of the U.S. dollar in relation to the Canadian dollar. The resulting $21.7 million change primarily reflects increases of $12.6 million in employee compensation and related costs, $4.6 million in professional services and fees, $3.0 million in facilities and information systems and $1.1 million in depreciation expense.
Selling and marketingexpense benefitted by $0.7 million in foreign exchange rates primarily due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar in relation to the Euro. The resulting $12.0 million change primarily reflects increases of $9.5 million in employee compensation, and related costs, $1.2 million in travel-related expenditures, and $0.5 million in facilities and information systems expenses.
General and administrativeexpense was negatively affected by $0.1 million in foreign exchange rates primarily due to the weakening of the U.S. dollar in relation to the Canadian dollar. The resulting $8.9 million net change primarily reflects increases of $4.2 million in consulting service expense, $2.1 million in employee compensation and related costs and $2.0 million in facilities and information systems expenses.
Acquisition and integration costsassociated with the MEN Acquisition reflect consulting and third party service fees, which were expensed in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. We also purchased $0.1 million in capitalized equipment, primarily related to information technology, which is included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. See Note 3 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 of Part I of this report.
Amortization of intangible assetsincreased due to the acquisition of additional intangible assets as a result of the MEN Acquisition. See Note 3 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 of Part I of this report.
Restructuring costsfor fiscal 2010 reflect the headcount reductions during the second quarter of fiscal 2010 described in the “Overview — Restructuring Activities” above.
Goodwill impairment costsreflect the impairment of goodwill and resulting charge described in Note 4 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 of Part I of this report.
Other items
     The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in other items for the periods indicated:
                         
  Quarter Ended April 30,    
                  Increase  
  2009 %* 2010 %* (decrease) %**
Interest and other income (loss), net $3,508   2.4  $3,748   1.5  $240   6.8 
Interest expense $1,852   1.3  $4,113   1.6  $2,261   122.1 
Loss on cost method investments $2,570   1.8  $     $(2,570)  (100.0)
Benefit for income taxes $(672)  (0.5) $(1,578)  (0.6) $(906)  134.8 
*Denotes % of total revenue
**Denotes % change from 2009 to 2010
Interest and other income (loss), net increased as the result of a $6.6 million non-cash gain related to the fair value of the redemption feature associated with our 4.0% Convertible Senior Notes due March 15, 2015. See Notes 7 and 15 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements found under Item 1 of Part I of this report for more information regarding the issuance of these convertible notes and the fair value of the redemption feature contained therein. This gain was partially offset by a $3.3 million decrease in interest income due to lower interest rates and invested balances and a $1.1 million increase of other losses related to foreign currency re-measurements. Increased interest and other income, net also reflects a $2.0 million charge relating to the termination of an indemnification asset upon the expiration of the statute of limitations applicable to one of the uncertain tax contingencies acquired as part of the MEN Acquisition.

40


Interest expenseincreased due our private placement of $375.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.0% Convertible Senior Notes due March 15, 2015. See Note 15 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements found under Item 1 of Part I of this report.
Loss on cost method investmentsfor fiscal 2009 was primarily due to a decline in value of our investment in a privately held technology company that was determined to be other-than-temporary.
Benefit for income taxesincreased primarily due to the expiration of the statute of limitations applicable to the acquired, uncertain tax contingency noted above, partially offset by increased foreign tax obligations.
Six months ended April 30, 2009 compared to the six months ended April 30, 2010
Revenue, cost of goods sold and gross profit
     The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in revenue, cost of goods sold and gross profit for the periods indicated:
                         
  Six Months Ended April 30,           
                  Increase    
  2009  %*  2010  %*  (decrease)  %** 
Revenue:                        
Products $258,566   83.0  $355,474   82.8  $96,908   37.5 
Services  53,035   17.0   73,873   17.2   20,838   39.3 
                    
Total revenue  311,601   100.0   429,347   100.0   117,746   37.8 
                    
Costs:                        
Products  141,786   45.5   194,890   45.4   53,104   37.5 
Services  37,252   12.0   49,355   11.5   12,103   32.5 
                    
Total cost of goods sold  179,038   57.5   244,245   56.9   65,207   36.4 
                    
Gross profit $132,563   42.5  $185,102   43.1  $52,539   39.6 
                    
*Denotes % of total revenue
**Denotes % change from 2009 to 2010
     The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in product revenue, product cost of goods sold and product gross profit for the periods indicated:
                         
  Six Months Ended April 30,       
                  Increase    
  2009  %*  2010  %*  (decrease)  %** 
Product revenue $258,566   100.0  $355,474   100.0  $96,908   37.5 
Product cost of goods sold  141,786   54.8   194,890   54.8   53,104   37.5 
                    
Product gross profit $116,780   45.2  $160,584   45.2  $43,804   37.5 
                    
*Denotes % of product revenue
**Denotes % change from 2009 to 2010
     The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in services revenue, services cost of goods sold and services gross profit for the periods indicated:

41


                         
  Six Months Ended April 30,       
                  Increase    
  2009  %*  2010  %*  (decrease)  %** 
Services revenue $53,035   100.0  $73,873   100.0  $20,838   39.3 
Services cost of goods sold  37,252   70.2   49,355   66.8   12,103   32.5 
                    
Services gross profit $15,783   29.8  $24,518   33.2  $8,735   55.3 
                    
*Denotes % of services revenue
**Denotes % change from 2009 to 2010
     Revenue from sales to customers based outside of the United States is reflected as “International” in the geographic distribution of revenue below. The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in geographic distribution of revenue for the periods indicated:
                         
  Six Months Ended April 30,       
                  Increase    
  2009  %*  2010  %*  (decrease)  %** 
United States $190,647   61.2  $304,435   70.9  $113,788   59.7 
International  120,954   38.8   124,912   29.1   3,958   3.3 
                    
Total $311,601   100.0  $429,347   100.0  $117,746   37.8 
                    
 
* Denotes % of total revenue
 
** Denotes % change from 2009 to 2010
     Certain customers each accounted for at least 10% of our revenue for the periods indicated (in thousands, except percentage data) as follows:
                                
 Quarter Ended January 31,  Six Months Ended April 30, 
 2009 % * 2010 % *  2009 %* 2010 %* 
Company A $32,556 19.4 $42,515 24.2  $72,661 23.3 $113,323 26.4 
Company B 18,877 11.3 n/a   n/a  51,867 12.1 
Company C 16,938 10.1 n/a   33,239 10.7 n/a  
                  
Total $68,371 40.8 $42,515 24.2  $105,900 34.0 $165,190 38.5 
                  
 
n/a Denotes revenue recognized less than 10% of total revenue for the period
 
* Denotes % of total revenue
     Revenue
  Product revenueincreased primarily due to a $30.9$92.4 million increase in sales of our carrierCarrier Ethernet service deliveryService Delivery products, primarily reflecting a $31.6 million increase inprincipally related to sales of our switching and aggregation products. Thisproducts in support of wireless backhaul deployments, and a $37.5 million increase was partiallyof Packet-Optical Transport revenue. These increases offset by a $21.6$31.5 million decrease in sales of our optical service delivery products. Lower optical service delivery revenue reflects decreases of $21.3 million in sales of core switching products, $2.8 million in sales of core transport products, and $2.1 million in sales of legacy data networking and metro transport products. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of $4.6 million in sales of our CN 4200™ FlexSelect™ Advanced Service Platform.Packet-Optical Switching revenue.
 
  Services revenuedecreasedincreased primarily due to a $1.9$14.7 million decreaseincrease in maintenance support revenue, a $3.6 million increase in professional services and a $2.5 million increase in installation and deployment services.
 
  United States revenueincreased primarily due to a $30.1$90.4 million increase in sales of our carrierCarrier Ethernet service deliveryService Delivery products, primarily reflecting a $30.9 million increase in sales of our switchingPacket-Optical Transport revenue and aggregation products. This increase was partially offset by a $6.7 million decrease in sales of our optical service delivery products. Lower optical service delivery revenue reflects decreases of $16.0 million in sales of core switching products and $1.4 million in sales of legacy data networking and metro transport products. These decreases were partially offset by increases of $8.1 million in sales of CN 4200 and $2.6 million in sales of core transport products. In addition, U.S revenue benefited from a $1.5$17.0 million increase in services revenue. These increases offset a $24.2 million decrease in decrease in Packet-Optical Switching revenue.
International revenueincreased primarily due to a $6.7 million increase in Packet-Optical Transport revenue, a $3.8 million increase in services revenue and a $2.0 million increase in sales of Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery products. These increases offset a $7.4 million decrease in Packet-Optical Switching revenue.

31


International revenuedecreased primarily due to a $14.9 million decrease in sales of our optical service delivery products. This reflects a decrease of $5.5 million in sales of core transport products, $5.3 million in sales of core switching products, and $3.5 million in sales of CN 4200. In addition, services revenue decreased $2.4 million primarily related to a $2.0 million decrease in deployment services. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of $0.8 million in sales of carrier Ethernet service delivery products.
     Gross profit
  Gross profit as a percentage of revenueincreased due to lower charges related to excess and obsolete inventory partially offset by unfavorable product mix.improved service gross margin.
 
  Gross profit on products as a percentage of product revenuewas unchanged. Fiscal 2010 gross profit was

42


adversely affected by a lower concentration of Packet-Optical Switching sales as well as increased benefittingcosts resulting from the revaluation of MEN Business inventory described above and increased amortization of intangible assets resulting from the MEN Acquisition. These additional costs were offset by lower charges related towarranty and excess and obsolete inventory. The firstinventory charges as compared to fiscal 2009. Gross margin for the second quarter of fiscal 2009 reflected higher than typical charges relating to excess and obsolete inventory. Gross profit for the first quarter of 2010 reflects an immaterial adjustment to reduce cost of goods soldwas negatively affected by $3.3a $5.8 million to correct warranty expensescharge related to prior periods. These improvements were partially offset by a less favorable product mix in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. See Note 1 for more information regarding the immaterial adjustment to warranty expense in the first quarter of fiscal 2010.two loss contracts described above.
 
  Gross profit on services as a percentage of services revenuedecreased slightlyincreased due to higher costs related to deployment services.concentration of maintenance support and professional services as a percentage of revenue.
Operating expense
     Increased operating expenses for the six months of fiscal 2010 principally reflect the acquisition of the MEN Business on March 19, 2010. The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in operating expense for the periods indicated:
                                                
 Quarter Ended January 31, Increase    Six Months Ended April 30, Increase   
 2009 % * 2010 % * (decrease) %**  2009 %* 2010 %* (decrease) %** 
Research and development $46,700 27.9 $50,033 28.4 $3,333 7.1  $96,182 30.9 $121,175 28.2 $24,993 26.0 
Selling and marketing 33,819 20.2 34,237 19.5 418 1.2  67,114 21.5 79,565 18.5 12,451 18.6 
General and administrative 11,585 6.9 12,763 7.3 1,178 10.2  24,200 7.8 34,266 8.0 10,066 41.6 
Acquisition and integration costs   27,031 15.4 27,031 100.0   0.0 66,252 15.4 66,252 100.0 
Amortization of intangible assets 6,404 3.8 5,981 3.4  (423)  (6.6) 12,628 4.1 23,102 5.4 10,474 82.9 
Restructuring costs 76 0.0  (21) 0.0  (97)  (127.6) 6,475 2.1 1,828 0.4  (4,647)  (71.8)
Goodwill impairment 455,673 146.2  0.0  (455,673)  (100.0)
                      
Total operating expense $98,584 58.8 $130,024 74.0 $31,440 31.9  $662,272 212.6 $326,188 75.9 $(336,084)  (50.7)
                      
 
* Denotes % of total revenue
 
** Denotes % change from 2009 to 2010
  Research and developmentexpense benefited by $0.8 million in favorable foreign exchange rates, primarily due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar in relation to the Canadian dollar. The resulting $3.3 million change primarily reflects increases of $2.3 million in prototype expense related to the development initiatives described above, $0.8 million in professional services and fees, $0.3 million in depreciation expense and $0.3 million in facilities and information systems expenses. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $0.5 million in employee compensation and related costs.
Selling and marketingexpense was negatively affected by $0.6$6.4 million in foreign exchange rates, primarily due to the weakening of the U.S. dollar in relation to the Euro.Canadian dollar. The resulting $0.4$25.0 million change primarily reflects increases of $0.9$12.1 million in employee compensation and related costs, $0.3$5.4 million in travel-related expenditures. These increases were partially offset by decreases of $0.5 million in marketing program costsprofessional services and $0.2fees, $3.2 million in facilities and information systems, expenses.$2.4 million in prototype expense related to the development initiatives described above, and $1.4 million in depreciation expense.
 
  GeneralSelling and administrativemarketingexpense was negatively affected by $0.1$0.2 million in foreign exchange rates primarily due to the weakening of the U.S. dollar in relation to the Euro.Canadian dollar. The resulting $1.2$12.5 million net change primarily reflects increases of $0.6 million in consulting service expense, $0.2$10.5 million in employee compensation and related costs, $0.2 million in facilities and information systems expenses, and $0.1$1.5 million in travel-related expenditures.
 
  General and administrativeexpense was negatively affected by $0.2 million in foreign exchange rates primarily due to the weakening of the U.S. dollar in relation to the Canadian dollar. The resulting $10.1 million change primarily reflects increases of $4.8 million in consulting service expense, $2.5 million in employee compensation and related costs, and $1.8 million in facilities and information systems expenses.
Acquisition and integration costswere related to the pending acquisition of the optical and carrier Ethernet assets of Nortel’s Metro Ethernet Networks (MEN) business as described above.MEN Acquisition. As of January 31,April 30, 2010, we have incurred $27.0$66.3 million in transaction, consulting and third party service fees, which were expensed in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. We also purchased $2.3 million in capitalized equipment, primarily related to information technology, which is included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.

32


  Amortization of intangible assetsdecreasedincreased due to certainthe acquisition of additional intangible assets reaching their useful life and becoming fully amortized prior toas a result of the first quarter of fiscal 2010.MEN Acquisition.
 
  Restructuring costsdecreased by $0.1 million duefor fiscal 2010 primarily reflect the headcount reductions taken during the second quarter of fiscal 2010 described in the “Overview — Restructuring Activities” above.
Goodwill impairment costsreflect the impairment of goodwill and resulting charge described in Note 4 to reduced one-time termination benefits.our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 of Part I of this report
Other items
     The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in other items for the periods indicated:

43


                                                
 Quarter Ended January 31, Increase   Six Months Ended April 30, Increase  
 2009 % * 2010 % * (decrease) %** 2009 %* 2010 %* (decrease) %**
Interest and other income (loss), net $4,660 2.8 $(773)  (0.4) $(5,433)  (116.6) $8,168 2.6 $2,975   0.7  $(5,193)  (63.6)
Interest expense $1,844 1.1 $1,828 1.0 $(16)  (0.9) $3,696 1.2 $5,941 1.4 $2,245 60.7 
Loss on cost method investments $565 0.3 $  $(565)  (100.0) $3,135 1.0 $  $(3,135)  (100.0)
Provision for income taxes $341 0.2 $868 0.5 $527 154.5 
Benefit for income taxes $(331)  (0.1) $(710)  (0.2) $(379) 114.5 
 
* Denotes % of total revenue
 
** Denotes % change from 2009 to 2010
  Interest and other income (loss), netdecreased as a result of a $4.9an $8.2 million decrease in interest income due to lower interest rates and lower invested balances and a $0.5$1.5 million increase of other losses related to foreign currency re-measurements. Decreased interest and other income, net also reflects a $2.0 million charge relating to the termination of an indemnification asset upon the expiration of the statute of limitations applicable to one of the uncertain tax contingencies acquired as part of the MEN Acquisitions. These items were partially offset by a $6.6 million non-cash gain related to the fair value of the redemption feature associated with our 4.0% Convertible Senior Notes due March 15, 2015. See Notes 7 and 15 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements found under Item 1 of Part I of this report for more information regarding the issuance of these convertible notes and the fair value of the redemption feature contained therein.
 
  Interest expenseremained relatively unchanged.increased due our private placement of $375.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.0% Convertible Senior Notes due March 15, 2015. See Note 15 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements found under Item 1 of Part I of this report.
 
  Loss on cost method investmentsfor fiscal 2009 was primarily due to a decline in value of our investment in atwo privately held technology companycompanies that was determined to be other-than-temporary.
 
  ProvisionBenefit for income taxesincreased primarily due to the expiration of the statute of limitations applicable to the acquired, uncertain tax contingency noted above, partially offset by increased foreign income tax obligations.
Results of Operating Segments
     Upon the completion of the MEN Acquisition, we reorganized our internal organizational structure and the management of our business into the following operating segments: Packet-Optical Transport; Packet-Optical Switching; Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery; and Software and Services. See Note 19 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements found under Item 1 of Part I of this report. The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in our operating segment revenue, including the presentation of prior periods to reflect the change in reportable segments, for the periods indicated:
                         
  Quarter Ended April 30,  Increase    
  2009  %*  2010  %*  (decrease)  %** 
Revenue:                        
Packet Optical Transport $60,353   41.8  $97,689   38.5  $37,336   61.9 
Packet Optical Switching  42,681   29.6   32,434   12.8   (10,247)  (24.0)
Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery  13,357   9.3   74,806   29.5   61,449   460.1 
Software and Services  27,810   19.3   48,542   19.2   20,732   74.5 
                      
Consolidated revenue $144,201   100.0  $253,471   100.0  $109,270   75.8 
                      
*Denotes % of total revenue
**Denotes % change from 2009 to 2010
Packet-Optical Transport revenuefor fiscal 2010 reflects the addition of $35.4 million in revenue from the MEN Business and an increase of $1.9 million related to Ciena’s pre-acquisition portfolio. Revenue reflects the addition of $16.2 million related to OME 6500 and $14.2 million related to OM 5200, as well as an $11.0 million increase in sales of CN 4200. These increases offset a $9.5 million decrease in CoreStream revenue, reflecting in part, the long life cycle of this platform and the eliminationongoing platform transition resulting from the MEN Acquisition.
Packet-Optical Switching revenuedecreased reflecting a decline in CoreDirector revenue. Sales of refundable federal tax credits,Packet-Optical Switching products reflect principally our CoreDirector platform, which expired on December 31, 2009.has a concentrated customer base and few significant purchasers. As a result, revenue can fluctuate considerably depending upon individual customer purchasing decisions.

44


Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery revenueincreased significantly, reflecting sales of switching and aggregation products in support of wireless backhaul deployments.
Software and Services revenueincreased primarily due to the addition of $13.6 million in maintenance support revenue from the MEN Business, a $4.4 million increase in installation and deployment services and a $3.1 million increase in professional services.
     The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in our operating segment revenue for the periods indicated, including the presentation of prior periods to reflect the change in reportable segments:
                         
  Six Months Ended April 30,  Increase    
  2009  %*  2010  %*  (decrease)  %** 
Revenue:                        
Packet Optical Transport $143,636   46.2  $181,159   42.2  $37,523   26.1 
Packet Optical Switching  87,338   28.0   55,832   13.0   (31,506)  (36.1)
Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery  22,884   7.3   115,245   26.8   92,361   403.6 
Software and Services  57,743   18.5   77,111   18.0   19,368   33.5 
                      
Consolidated revenue $311,601   100.0  $429,347   100.0  $117,746   37.8 
                      
*Denotes % of total revenue
**Denotes % change from fiscal 2009 to fiscal 2010
Packet-Optical Transport revenuefor fiscal 2010 reflects the addition of $35.4 million in revenue from the MEN Business and an increase of $2.1 million related to Ciena’s pre-acquisition portfolio. Revenue reflects the addition of $16.2 million related to OME 6500 and $14.2 million related to OM 5200, as well as a $15.6 million increase in sales of CN 4200. These increases offset a $12.3 million decrease in CoreStream revenue, reflecting in part, the long life cycle of this platform and the ongoing platform transition resulting from the MEN Acquisition.
Packet-Optical Switching revenuedecreased reflecting a decline in CoreDirector revenue. Sales of Packet-Optical Switching products reflect principally our CoreDirector platform, which has a concentrated customer base and few significant purchasers. As a result, revenue can fluctuate considerably depending upon individual customer purchasing decisions.
Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery revenueincreased significantly, reflecting sales of switching and aggregation products in support of wireless backhaul deployments.
Software and Services revenueincreased primarily due to a $14.7 million increase in maintenance support revenue, a $3.6 million increase in professional services and a $2.5 million increase installation and deployment services.
Segment Profit (Loss)
     The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in our segment profit (loss), including the presentation of prior periods to reflect the change in reportable segments, for the respective periods:
                 
  Quarter Ended April 30,  
          Increase  
  2009 2010 (decrease) %**
Segment profit (loss):                
Packet-Optical Transport $(3,548) $(6,595) $(3,047)  85.9 
Packet-Optical Switching  14,559   5,467   (9,092)  (62.4)
Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery  (4,295)  25,972   30,267   (704.7)
Software and Services  4,522   8,956   4,434   98.1 
**Denotes % change from 2009 to 2010
Packet-Optical Transport segment lossincreased due to higher research and development costs, in part due to the MEN Acquisition, partially offset by increased sales volume and gross margin.

45


Packet-Optical Switching segment profitdecreased due to lower sales volume and increased research and development costs.
Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery segment profitincreased due to significantly higher sales volume and improved gross margin, partially offset by increased research and development costs.
Software and Services segment profitincreased due to increased sales volume and improved gross margin, partially offset by increased research and development costs.
     The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in our segment profit (loss), including the presentation of prior periods to reflect the change in reportable segments, for the respective periods:
                 
  Six Months Ended April 30,    
          Increase    
  2009  2010  (decrease)  %** 
Segment profit (loss):                
Packet-Optical Transport $7,474  $13,528  $6,054   81.0 
Packet-Optical Switching  32,882   3,429   (29,453)  (89.6)
Carrier Ethernert Service Delivery  (14,898)  34,854   49,752   (334.0)
Software and Services  10,923   12,116   1,193   10.9 
**Denotes % change from 2009 to 2010
Packet-Optical Transport segment profitincreased due to higher sales volume and improved gross margin, partially offset by higher research and development costs, in part due to the MEN Acquisition.
Packet-Optical Switching segment profitdecreased due to lower sales volume and increased research and development costs.
Carrier Ethernet Service Delivery segment profitincreased due to significantly higher sales volume and improved gross margin.
Software and Services segment profitincreased due to higher sales volume and improved gross margin, partially offset by increased research and development costs.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
     At January 31,April 30, 2010, our principal sources of liquidity were cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments. During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, we reallocated our previous short and long-term investments, principally into U.S. treasuries. As a result, at January 31, 2010, all short-term investmentswhich principally represent U.S. treasuries. The following table summarizes our cash and cash equivalents and investments (in thousands):
                        
 October 31, January 31, Increase  October 31, April 30, Increase 
 2009 2010 (decrease)  2009 2010 (decrease) 
Cash and cash equivalents $485,705 $573,180 $87,475  $485,705 $584,229 $98,524 
Short-term investments in marketable debt securities 563,183 428,409  (134,774) 563,183 29,537  (533,646)
Long-term investments in marketable debt securities 8,031 8,048 17  8,031   (8,031)
              
Total cash and cash equivalents and investments in marketable debt securities $1,056,919 $1,009,637 $(47,282) $1,056,919 $613,766 $(443,153)
              
     The decrease in total cash and cash equivalents and investments during the first threesix months of fiscal 2010 was primarily related to our initial depositpayment of $38.5$711.9 million related to the pending acquisition of Nortel’spurchase price for the MEN business.
     These amounts were slightlyAcquisition, partially offset by $4.5our receipt of $369.7 million in net proceeds from the private placement of cash generated from operating activities$375.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.0% Convertible Senior Notes due March 15, 2015. As described in “Operating Activities” below. Cash generated frombelow, $73.2 million of cash was used in operating activities, reflectsreflecting payments of approximately $11.4$54.5 million related to acquisition and integration activities. See NoteNotes 3 aboveand 15 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 1 of Part I of this report for more information regarding the pending acquisitionMEN Acquisition and its effect on our cash and debt position.convertible notes offering.
     Based on past performance and current expectations, we believe that our cash and cash equivalents, investments and cash generated from operations will satisfy our working capital needs, capital expenditures, and other liquidity requirements associated with our existing operations through at least the next 12 months.
     The following sections review the significant activities that had an impact on our cash during the first threesix months of fiscal 2010.

3346


Operating Activities
     The following tables set forth (in thousands) components of our cash generated from operating activities during the period:
     Net loss
     
  Three Months Ended 
  January 31, 
  2010 
Net loss $(53,333)
    
     
  Six Months Ended 
  April 30, 
  2010 
Net loss $(143,342)
    
     Our net loss during the first threesix months of fiscal 2010 included the significant non-cash items summarized in the following table (in thousands):
        
 Three Months Ended  Six Months Ended 
 January 31,  April 30, 
 2010  2010 
Depreciation of equipment, furniture and fixtures; and amortization of leasehold improvements $5,871 
Depreciation of equipment, furniture and fixtures, and amortization of leasehold improvements $13,543 
Share-based compensation costs 8,282  16,799 
Amortization of intangible assets 7,631  33,618 
Provision for inventory excess and obsolescence 950  7,100 
Provision for warranty 3,060  8,847 
      
Total significant non-cash charges $25,794  $79,907 
      
     Accounts Receivable, Net
     Cash providedExcluding the addition of $7.5 million of accounts receivable recorded in connection with the MEN Acquisition, cash used by accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, during the first threesix months of fiscal 2010 was $12.6$53.3 million. Our days sales outstanding (DSOs) decreasedincreased from 7067 days for the first threesix months of fiscal 2009 to 5475 days for the first threesix months of fiscal 2010. Our DSOs decreasedincreased due to lower incidencea larger proportion of customer payment delays.shipments occurring later in our second quarter of fiscal 2010.
     The following table sets forth (in thousands) changes to our accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, from the end of fiscal 2009 through the end of the firstsecond quarter of fiscal 2010:
             
  October 31,  January 31,  Increase 
  2009  2010  (decrease) 
Accounts receivable, net $118,251  $105,624  $(12,627)
          
             
  October 31,  April 30,  Increase 
  2009  2010  (decrease) 
Accounts receivable, net $118,251  $178,959  $60,708 
          
     Inventory
     CashExcluding the addition of $114.2 million of inventory recorded in connection with the MEN Acquisition, cash consumed by inventory during the first threesix months of fiscal 2010 was $8.3$38.3 million. Our inventory turns decreased slightly from 3.33.1 turns during the first threesix months of fiscal 2009 to 3.21.7 turns for the first threesix months of fiscal 2010. This reduction relates principally to the significant additional inventory from the MEN Acquisition, as compared to the product cost of goods sold for that portion of the second quarter following the completion of this transaction and is not indicative of our expectation for a full quarter’s results or the business going forward.
     During the first threesix months of fiscal 2010, changes in inventory reflect a $1.0$7.1 million reduction related to a non-cash provision for excess and obsolescence. The following table sets forth (in thousands) changes to the components of our inventory from the end of fiscal 2009 through the end of the firstsecond quarter of fiscal 2010:

47


                        
 October 31, January 31, Increase  October 31, April 30, Increase 
 2009 2010 (decrease)  2009 2010 (decrease) 
Raw materials $19,694 $18,256 $(1,438) $19,694 $21,309 $1,615 
Work-in-process 1,480 2,255 775  1,480 3,958 2,478 
Finished goods 90,914 98,264 7,350  90,914 236,135 145,221 
              
Gross inventory 112,088 118,775 6,687  112,088 261,402 149,314 
Provision for inventory excess and obsolescence  (24,002)  (23,344) 658   (24,002)  (27,997)  (3,995)
              
Inventory $88,086 $95,431 $7,345  $88,086 $233,405 $145,319 
              
     Accounts payable, accruals and other obligations

34


     CashExcluding the addition of $39.0 million of accounts payable, accruals and other obligations recorded in connection with the MEN Acquisition, cash generated in operations related to accounts payable, accruals and other obligations during the first threesix months of fiscal 2010 was $11.4$83.5 million.
     During the first threesix months of fiscal 2010, we had non-operating cash accounts payable increasesdecreases of $1.8$0.8 million related to equipment purchases.purchases and an increase of $5.0 million related to debt issuance costs. Changes in accrued liabilities reflect non-cash provisions of $3.1$8.8 million related to warranties. The following table sets forth (in thousands) changes in our accounts payable, accruals and other obligations from the end of fiscal 2009 through the end of the firstsecond quarter of fiscal 2010:
                        
 October 31, January 31, Increase  October 31, April 30, Increase 
 2009 2010 (decrease)  2009 2010 (decrease) 
Accounts payable $53,104 $76,211 $23,107  $53,104 $105,138 $52,034 
Accrued liabilities 103,349 97,560  (5,789) 103,349 185,808 82,459 
Restructuring liabilities 9,605 8,750  (855) 9,605 9,807 202 
Other long-term obligations 8,554 8,330  (224) 8,554 9,413 859 
              
Accounts payable, accruals and other obligations $174,612 $190,851 $16,239  $174,612 $310,166 $135,554 
              
     Interest Payable on Convertible Notes
     Interest on our outstanding 0.25% convertible senior notes, due May 1, 2013, is payable on May 1 and November 1 of each year. We paid $0.4 million in interest on our 0.25%these convertible notes during the first threesix months of fiscal 2010.
     Interest on our outstanding 4.0% convertible senior notes, due March 15, 2015, is payable on March 15 and September 15 of each year. Our initial interest payment on these notes will be due on September 15, 2010.
     Interest on our outstanding 0.875% convertible senior notes, due June 15, 2017, is payable on June 15 and December 15 of each year. We paid $2.2 million in interest on our 0.875%these convertible notes during the first threesix months of fiscal 2010.
     The indentures governing our outstanding convertible notes do not contain any financial covenants. The indentures provide for customary events of default, including payment defaults, breaches of covenants, failure to pay certain judgments and certain events of bankruptcy, insolvency and reorganization. If an event of default occurs and is continuing, the principal amount of the notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, may be declared immediately due and payable. These amounts automatically become due and payable if an event of default relating to certain events of bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization occurs. See Note 15 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 1 of Part I of this report for more information regarding our outstanding convertible notes.
     The following table reflects (in thousands) the balance of interest payable and the change in this balance from the end of fiscal 2009 through the end of the firstsecond quarter of fiscal 2010:
             
  October 31,  January 31,  Increase 
  2009  2010  (decrease) 
Accrued interest payable $2,045  $738  $(1,307)
          
             
  October 31,  April 30,  Increase 
  2009  2010  (decrease) 
Accrued interest payable $2,045  $3,965  $1,920 
          
     Deferred revenue
     DeferredExcluding the addition of $18.8 million of deferred revenue increasedrecorded in connection with the MEN Acquisition, deferred revenue decreased by $5.0$3.0 million during the first threesix months of fiscal 2010. Product deferred revenue represents payments received in advance of shipment

48


and payments received in advance of our ability to recognize revenue. Services deferred revenue is related to payment for service contracts that will be recognized over the contract term. The following table reflects (in thousands) the balance of deferred revenue and the change in this balance from the end of fiscal 2009 through the end of the firstsecond quarter of fiscal 2010:
                        
 October 31, January 31, Increase  October 31, April 30, Increase 
 2009 2010 (decrease)  2009 2010 (decrease) 
Products $11,998 $15,536 $3,538  $11,998 $13,265 $1,267 
Services 63,935 65,363 1,428  63,935 78,426 14,491 
              
Total deferred revenue $75,933 $80,899 $4,966  $75,933 $91,691 $15,758 
              
Investing Activities
     During the first threesix months of fiscal 2010, we had net sales and maturities of approximately $197.7$604.2 million of available for sale securities. Investing activities also include our initial depositpayment of $38.5the $711.9 million purchase price related to the pending acquisition of Nortel’s MEN business.Acquisition. Investing activities also included the purchase of $63.6 million in marketable debt securities and the payment of approximately $7.0$18.3 million in equipment purchases. We also purchased an additional $3.3$0.6 million of equipment whichthat was included in accounts payable. Of the $3.3 million included in accounts payable, $2.3 million was related to the acquisition. Purchases of equipment in accounts payable increaseddecreased by $1.8$0.8 million from the end of fiscal 2009.

35

Financing Activities


     On March 15, 2010, we completed a private placement of 4.0% Convertible Senior Notes due March 15, 2015 in aggregate principal amount of $375.0 million. The net proceeds from this offering during second quarter of fiscal 2010 were $369.7 million; however, we estimate that the final net proceeds from the offering will be approximately $364.3 million, after deducting the remaining payment of fees to one of the placement agents.
Contractual Obligations
     On November 23, 2009 we announced that we had been selected asSignificant changes to contractual obligations during the successful bidder in the auctionfirst six months of substantially all of the optical networkingfiscal 2010 relate to purchase obligations and carrier Ethernet assets of Nortel’s MEN business. In accordanceoperating leases, principally for additional facilities, associated with the definitive purchase agreements, as amended, we have agreedMEN Acquisition. Changes to pay $530 million in cashinterest and issue $239 millionprincipal due on convertible notes relate to our private placement, during the second quarter of fiscal 2010, of 4.0% Convertible Senior Notes due March 15, 2015 in aggregate principal amount of 6% Senior Convertible notes due in 2017 for a total consideration of $769 million for the assets. See Note 3 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements above for more information regarding the pending acquisition of substantially all of the optical networking and carrier Ethernet assets of Nortel’s MEN business and the terms of the notes.
     During the first three months of fiscal 2010, we did not experience material changes, outside of the ordinary course of business, in our contractual obligations from those reported in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2009.$375.0 million. The following is a summary of our future minimum payments under contractual obligations as of January 31,April 30, 2010 (in thousands):
                                        
 Less than One to three Three to five    Less than One to Three to   
 Total one year years years Thereafter  Total one year three years five years Thereafter 
Interest due on convertible notes $35,420 $5,120 $10,240 $9,122 $10,938  $110,420 $20,120 $40,240 $39,123 $10,937 
Principal due at maturity on convertible notes 798,000   298,000 500,000  1,173,000   673,000 500,000 
Operating leases (1) 59,138 14,856 22,139 13,889 8,254  104,681 24,798 32,465 22,199 25,219 
Purchase obligations (2) 99,013 99,013     168,321 168,321    
Transition service obligations (3) 23,392 23,392    
                      
Total (3) $991,571 $118,989 $32,379 $321,011 $519,192 
Total (4) $1,579,814 $236,631 $72,705 $734,322 $536,156 
                      
 
(1) The amount for operating leases above does not include insurance, taxes, maintenance and other costs required by the applicable operating lease. These costs are variable and are not expected to have a material impact.
 
(2) Purchase obligations relate to purchase order commitments to our contract manufacturers and component suppliers for inventory. In certain instances, we are permitted to cancel, reschedule or adjust these orders. Consequently, only a portion of the amount reported above relates to firm, non-cancelable and unconditional obligations.
 
(3) Transition service obligations represent the non-cancelable portion of fees under the transition service agreement. See “Overview — Integration Activities and Expense.”
(4)As of January 31,April 30, 2010, we also had approximately $6.2$6.8 million of other long-term obligations in our condensed consolidated balance sheet for unrecognized tax positions that are not included in this table because the periods of cash settlement with the respective tax authority cannot be reasonably estimated.
     Some of our commercial commitments, including some of the future minimum payments set forth above, are secured by standby letters of credit. The following is a summary of our commercial commitments secured by standby letters of credit by commitment expiration date as of January 31,April 30, 2010 (in thousands):

49


                     
      Less than one  One to three  Three to five    
  Total  year  years  years  Thereafter 
Standby letters of credit $24,936  $22,832  $1,400  $704  $ 
                
                 
      Less than  One to  Three to 
  Total  one year  three years  five years 
Standby letters of credit $31,899  $28,006  $3,189  $704 
             
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
     We do not engage in any off-balance sheet financing arrangements. In particular, we do not have any equity interests in so-called limited purpose entities, which include special purpose entities (SPEs) and structured finance entities.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
     The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires that we make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expense, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. By their nature, these estimates and judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. On an ongoing basis, we reevaluate our estimates, including those related to bad debts, inventories, investments, intangible assets, goodwill, income taxes, warranty obligations, restructuring, derivatives and hedging, and contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Among other things, these estimates form the basis for judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. To the extent that there are material differences between our estimates and actual results, our consolidated financial statements will be affected.

36


     We believe that the following critical accounting policies reflect those areas where significant judgments and estimates are used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
     We recognize revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. We consider revenue to be realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; the price to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and collectibility is reasonably assured. Customer purchase agreements and customer purchase orders are generally used to determine the existence of an arrangement. Shipping documents and customer acceptance, when applicable, are used to verify delivery. We assess whether the price is fixed or determinable based on the payment terms associated with the transaction and whether the sales price is subject to refund or adjustment. We assess collectibility based primarily on the creditworthiness of the customer as determined by credit checks and analysis, as well as the customer’s payment history. In instances where final acceptance of the product, system, or solution is specified by the customer, revenue is deferred until all acceptance criteria have been met. Revenue for maintenance services is generally deferred and recognized ratably over the period during which the services are to be performed.
     We apply the percentage of completion method to long term arrangements where we are required to undertake significant production customizations or modification, and reasonable and reliable estimates of revenue and cost are available. Utilizing the percentage of completion method, we recognize revenue based on the ratio of actual costs incurred to date to total estimated costs expected to be incurred. In instances that do not meet the percentage of completion method criteria, recognition of revenue is deferred until there are no uncertainties regarding customer acceptance. If circumstances arise that change the original estimates of revenue, costs, or extent of progress toward completion, revisions to the estimates are made. These revisions may result in increases or decreases in estimated revenue or costs, and such revisions are reflected in income in the period in which the circumstances that gave rise to the revision become known by management.
     Some of our communications networking equipment is integrated with software that is essential to the functionality of the equipment. Software revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is probable. In instances where final acceptance of the product is specified by the customer, revenue is deferred until all acceptance criteria have been met.there are no uncertainties regarding customer acceptance.
     Arrangements with customers may include multiple deliverables, including any combination of equipment, services and software. If multiple element arrangements include software or software-related elements that are essential to the equipment, we allocate the arrangement fee to those separate units of accounting. Multiple element arrangements that include software are separated into more than one unit of accounting if the functionality of the delivered element(s) is not dependent on the undelivered element(s), there is vendor-specific objective evidence of the fair value of the undelivered element(s), and general revenue recognition criteria related to the delivered element(s) have been met. The amount of product and services

50


revenue recognized is affected by our judgments as to whether an arrangement includes multiple elements and, if so, whether vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value exists. Changes to the elements in an arrangement and our ability to establish vendor-specific objective evidence for those elements could affect the timing of revenue recognition. For all other deliverables, we separate the elements into more than one unit of accounting if the delivered element(s) have value to the customer on a stand-alone basis, objective and reliable evidence of fair value exists for the undelivered element(s), and delivery of the undelivered element(s) is probable and substantially within our control. Revenue is allocated to each unit of accounting based on the relative fair value of each accounting unit or using the residual method if objective evidence of fair value does not exist for the delivered element(s). The revenue recognition criteria described above are applied to each separate unit of accounting. If these criteria are not met, revenue is deferred until the criteria are met or the last element has been delivered.
     Our total deferred revenue for products was $12.0 million and $15.5$13.3 million as of October 31, 2009 and January 31,April 30, 2010, respectively. Our services revenue is deferred and recognized ratably over the period during which the services are to be performed. Our total deferred revenue for services was $63.9 million and $65.4$78.4 million as of October 31, 2009 and January 31,April 30, 2010, respectively.
Share-Based Compensation
     We measure and recognize compensation expense for share-based awards based on estimated fair values on the date of grant. We estimate the fair value of each option-based award on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. This option pricing model requires that we make several estimates, including the option’s expected life and the price volatility of the underlying stock. The expected life of employee stock options represents the weighted-average period the stock options are expected to remain outstanding. Because we considered our options to be “plain vanilla,” we calculated the expected term using the simplified method for fiscal 2007. Options are considered to be “plain vanilla” if they have the following basic characteristics: they are granted “at-the-money;” exercisability is conditioned upon service through the vesting date; termination of service prior to vesting results in forfeiture; there is a limited exercise period following termination of service; and the options are non-transferable and non-hedgeable. Beginning in fiscal 2008 we gathered more detailed historical information about specific exercise behavior of our grantees, which we used to determine expected term. We considered the implied volatility and historical volatility of our stock price in determining our expected volatility, and, finding both to be equally reliable, determined that a combination of both measures would result in the best estimate of expected volatility. We recognize the estimated fair value of option-based awards, net of estimated forfeitures, as share-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period.

37


     We estimate the fair value of our restricted stock unit awards based on the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant. Our outstanding restricted stock unit awards are subject to service-based vesting conditions and/or performance-based vesting conditions. We recognize the estimated fair value of service-based awards, net of estimated forfeitures, as share-based expense ratably over the vesting period on a straight-line basis. Awards with performance-based vesting conditions require the achievement of certain financial or other performance criteria or targets as a condition to the vesting, or acceleration of vesting. We recognize the estimated fair value of performance-based awards, net of estimated forfeitures, as share-based expense over the performance period, using graded vesting, which considers each performance period or tranche separately, based upon our determination of whether it is probable that the performance targets will be achieved. At each reporting period, we reassess the probability of achieving the performance targets and the performance period required to meet those targets. Determining whether the performance targets will be achieved involves judgment, and the estimate of expense may be revised periodically based on changes in the probability of achieving the performance targets. Revisions are reflected in the period in which the estimate is changed. If any performance goals are not met, no compensation cost is ultimately recognized against that goal, and, to the extent previously recognized, compensation cost is reversed.
     Because share-based compensation expense is based on awards that are ultimately expected to vest, the amount of expense takes into account estimated forfeitures. We estimate forfeitures at the time of grant and revise, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Changes in these estimates and assumptions can materially affect the measure of estimated fair value of our share-based compensation. See Note 1517 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 of Part I of this report for information regarding our assumptions related to share-based compensation and the amount of share-based compensation expense we incurred for the periods covered in this report. As of January 31,April 30, 2010, total unrecognized compensation expense was: (i) $10.5$8.5 million, which relates to unvested stock options and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.0 year; and (ii) $52.8$69.9 million, which relates to unvested restricted stock units and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.41.7 years.
     We recognize windfall tax benefits associated with the exercise of stock options or release of restricted stock units directly to stockholders’ equity only when realized. A windfall tax benefit occurs when the actual tax benefit realized by us upon an employee’s disposition of a share-based award exceeds the deferred tax asset, if any, associated with the award that

51


we had recorded. When assessing whether a tax benefit relating to share-based compensation has been realized, we follow the tax law “with-and-without” method. Under the with-and-without method, the windfall is considered realized and recognized for financial statement purposes only when an incremental benefit is provided after considering all other tax benefits including our net operating losses. The with-and-without method results in the windfall from share-based compensation awards always being effectively the last tax benefit to be considered. Consequently, the windfall attributable to share-based compensation will not be considered realized in instances where our net operating loss carryover (that is unrelated to windfalls) is sufficient to offset the current year’s taxable income before considering the effects of current-year windfalls.
Reserve for Inventory Obsolescence
     We make estimates about future customer demand for our products when establishing the appropriate reserve for excess and obsolete inventory. We write down inventory that has become obsolete or unmarketable by an amount equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated market value based on assumptions about future demand and market conditions. Inventory write downs are a component of our product cost of goods sold. Upon recognition of the write down, a new lower cost basis for that inventory is established, and subsequent changes in facts and circumstances do not result in the restoration or increase in that newly established cost basis. We recorded charges for excess and obsolete inventory of $6.5$8.8 million and $1.0$7.1 million in the first threesix months of fiscal 2009 and 2010, respectively. TheseDuring fiscal 2009, these charges were primarily related to excess inventory due to a change in forecasted product sales. For the first six months of fiscal 2010, these charges were primarily related to excess and obsolete inventory charges relating to product rationalization decisions in connection with the MEN Acquisition. In an effort to limit our exposure to delivery delays and to satisfy customer needs we purchase inventory based on forecasted sales across our product lines. In addition, part of our research and development strategy is to promote the convergence of similar features and functionalities across our product lines. Each of these practices exposes us to the risk that our customers will not order products for which we have forecasted sales, or will purchase less than we have forecasted. Historically, we have experienced write downs due to changes in strategic direction, discontinuance of a product and declines in market conditions. If actual market conditions worsen or differ from those we have assumed, if there is a sudden and significant decrease in demand for our products, or if there is a higher incidence of inventory obsolescence due to a rapid change in technology, we may be required to take additional inventory write-downs, and our gross margin could be adversely affected. Our inventory net of allowance for excess and obsolescence was $88.1 million and $95.4$233.4 million as of October 31, 2009 and January 31,April 30, 2010, respectively.

38


Restructuring
     As part of our restructuring costs, we provide for the estimated cost of the net lease expense for facilities that are no longer being used. The provision is equal to the fair value of the minimum future lease payments under our contracted lease obligations, offset by the fair value of the estimated sublease payments that we may receive. As of January 31,April 30, 2010, our accrued restructuring liability related to net lease expense and other related charges was $8.7$9.8 million. The total minimum remaining lease payments for these restructured facilities are $13.5$12.2 million. These lease payments will be made over the remaining lives of our leases, which range from nine months to tennine years. If actual market conditions are different than those we have projected, we will be required to recognize additional restructuring costs or benefits associated with these facilities.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Receivable
     Our allowance for doubtful accounts receivable is based on management’s assessment, on a specific identification basis, of the collectibility of customer accounts. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and generally have not required collateral or other forms of security from customers. In determining the appropriate balance for our allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, management considers each individual customer account receivable in order to determine collectibility. In doing so, we consider creditworthiness, payment history, account activity and communication with such customer. If a customer’s financial condition changes, or if actual defaults are higher than our historical experience, we may be required to take a charge for an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable which could have an adverse impact on our results of operations. Our accounts receivable net of allowance for doubtful accounts was $118.3 million and $105.6$179.0 million as of October 31, 2009 and January 31,April 30, 2010, respectively. Our allowance for doubtful accounts as of October 31, 2009 and January 31,April 30, 2010 was $0.1 million.
Goodwill
     Goodwill represents the excess purchase price over amounts assigned to tangible or identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed from our acquisitions. We test goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, which we have determined to be the last business day of fiscal September each year. We also test goodwill for impairment between annual

52


tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would, more likely than not, reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying value. The first step is to compare the fair value of the reporting unit with the unit’s carrying amount, including goodwill. If this test indicates that the fair value is less than the carrying value, then step two is required to compare the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill. A non-cash goodwill impairment charge would have the effect of decreasing our earnings or increasing our losses in such period. If we are required to take a substantial impairment charge, our operating results would be materially adversely affected in such period. At April 30, 2010, we had $40.0 million in goodwill, assigned to our Packet-Optical Transport reporting unit. All of the goodwill on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of April 30, 2010 is a result of the acquisition of the MEN Business. See Note 4 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 of Part I of this report for information relating to our interim impairment assessment during fiscal 2009.
Long-lived Assets
     Our long-lived assets include: equipment, furniture and fixtures; finite-lived intangible assets; indefinite-lived intangible assets; and maintenance spares. As of October 31, 2009 and January 31,April 30, 2010 these assets totaled $154.7 million and $152.4$682.4 million, net, respectively. We test long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the assets’ carrying amount is not recoverable from its undiscounted cash flows. Our long-lived assets are part of a singleassigned to our reporting unitunits which represents the lowest level for which we identify cash flows.
Investments
     We have an investment portfolio comprised of marketable debt securities which are comprised of U.S. government obligations. The value of these securities is subject to market volatility for the period we hold these investments and until their sale or maturity. We recognize losses when we determine that declines in the fair value of our investments, below their cost basis, are other-than-temporary. In determining whether a decline in fair value is other-than-temporary, we consider various factors including market price (when available), investment ratings, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the investee, the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than our cost basis, and our intent and ability to hold the investment until maturity or for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value. We make significant judgments in considering these factors. If we judge that a decline in fair value is other-than-temporary, the investment is valued at the current fair value, and we would incur a loss equal to the decline, which could materially adversely affect our profitability and results of operations.
     As of January 31, 2010, we heldDerivatives
     Our 4% convertible senior notes include a minority investment of $0.9 million in a privately held technology companyredemption feature that is reported in other assets.accounted for as a separate embedded derivative. The market for technologies or products manufactured by this companyembedded redemption feature is inbifurcated from these notes using the early stage and markets may never materialize or become significant. This investment“with-and-without” approach. As such, the total value of the embedded redemption feature is inherently high risk and we could lose our entire investment. We monitor this investment for impairment and make appropriate reductions in carrying value when necessary. If market conditions,calculated as the expected financial performance, or the competitive position of this company deteriorates, we may be required to record a non-cash charge in future periods due to an impairment ofdifference between the value of our investment.these notes (the “Hybrid Instrument”) and the value of an identical instrument without the embedded redemption feature (the “Host Instrument”). Both the Host Instrument and the Hybrid Instrument are valued using a modified binomial model. The modified binomial model utilizes, a risk free interest rate, an implied volatility of Ciena’s stock, the recovery rates of bonds, and the implied default intensity of the 4.0% convertible senior notes. The embedded redemption feature is recorded at fair value on a recurring basis and these changes are included in interest and other income (expense), net on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Deferred Tax Valuation Allowance
     As of January 31,April 30, 2010, we have recorded a valuation allowance offsetting nearly all our net deferred tax assets of $1.2$1.3 billion. When measuring the need for a valuation allowance, we assess both positive and negative evidence regarding the realizability of these deferred tax assets. We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. In determining net deferred tax assets and valuation allowances, management is required to make judgments and estimates related to projections of profitability, the timing and extent of the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards, applicable tax rates, transfer pricing methodologies and tax planning strategies. The valuation allowance is reviewed quarterly and is maintained until sufficient positive evidence exists to support a reversal. Because evidence such as our operating results during the most recent three-year period is afforded more weight than forecasted results for future periods, our cumulative loss during this three-year period represents sufficient negative evidence regarding the need for nearly a full valuation allowance. We will release this valuation allowance when management determines that it is more likely than not that our deferred tax assets will be realized. Any future release of valuation allowance may be recorded as a tax benefit increasing net income or as an adjustment to paid-in capital, based on tax ordering requirements.

39


Warranty
     Our liability for product warranties, included in other accrued liabilities, was $40.2 million and $38.4$64.7 million as of October 31, 2009 and January 31,April 30, 2010, respectively. Our products are generally covered by a warranty for periods ranging from one to five years. We accrue for warranty costs as part of our cost of goods sold based on associated material costs, technical support labor costs, and associated overhead. Material cost is estimated based primarily upon historical trends in the volume of product returns within the warranty period and the cost to repair or replace the equipment. Technical support labor cost is estimated based primarily upon historical trends and the cost to support the customer cases within the warranty period. The provision for product warranties was $2.5$9.2 million and $3.1$8.8 million for the first quartersix months of fiscal 2009 and 2010, respectively. The provision for warranty claims may fluctuate on a quarterly basis depending upon the mix of products and customers in that period. If actual product failure rates, material replacement costs, service or labor costs differ from our estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty provision would be required. An increase in warranty claims or the related costs associated with satisfying these warranty obligations could increase our cost of sales and negatively affect our gross margin.

53


Uncertain Tax Positions
     We account for uncertainty in income tax positions using a two-step approach. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement. Significant judgment is required in evaluating our uncertain tax positions and determining our provision for income taxes. Although we believe our reserves are reasonable, no assurance can be given that the final tax outcome of these matters will not be different from that which is reflected in our historical income tax provisions and accruals. We adjust these reserves in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the closing of a tax audit or the refinement of an estimate. To the extent that the final tax outcome of these matters is different than the amounts recorded, such differences will affect the provision for income taxes in the period in which such determination is made. As of January 31,April 30, 2010, we had $1.3 million and $6.2$6.8 million recorded as current and long-term obligations, respectively, related to uncertain tax positions. The provision for income taxes includes the effect of reserve provisions and changes to reserves that are considered appropriate, as well as the related net interest.
Loss Contingencies
     We are subject to the possibility of various losses arising in the ordinary course of business. These may relate to disputes, litigation and other legal actions. We consider the likelihood of loss or the incurrence of a liability, as well as our ability to reasonably estimate the amount of loss, in determining loss contingencies. A loss is accrued when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. We regularly evaluate current information available to us to determine whether any accruals should be adjusted and whether new accruals are required.
Item 3.Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
     The following discussion about our market risk disclosures involves forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates.
     Interest Rate Sensitivity.We maintain a short-term and long-term investment portfolio. See Notes 56 and 67 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 of Part I of this report for information relating to these investments and their fair value. These available-for-sale securities are subject to interest rate risk and will fall in value if market interest rates increase. If market interest rates were to increase immediately and uniformly by 10 percentage points from current levels, the fair value of the portfolio would decline by approximately $10.5$0.2 million.
     Foreign Currency Exchange Risk.As a global concern, we face exposure to adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates. BecauseHistorically, our sales arehave primarily been denominated in U.S. dollars and the impact of foreign currency fluctuations on revenue has not been material. OurAs a result of our increased global presence from the MEN Acquisition, we expect that a larger percentage of our revenue will be non-U.S. dollar denominated, with increased sales denominated in Canadian Dollars and Euros. As a result, if the U.S. dollar strengthens against these currencies, our revenues could be adversely affected in our non-U.S. dollar denominated sales. For our U.S. dollar denominated sales, an increase in the value of the U.S. dollar would increase the real cost to our customers of our products in markets outside the United States.
     With regard to operating expense, our primary exposures to foreign currency exchange risk are related to non-U.S. dollar denominated operating expense in Canadian Dollars, (“CAD”), British Pounds, (“GBP”), Euros (“EUR”) and Indian Rupees (“INR”).Rupees. During the first threesix months of fiscal 2010, approximately 76%75.2% of our operating expense was U.S. dollar denominated.

40


     To reduce variability in non-U.S. dollar denominated operating expense, we have previously entered into foreign currency forward contracts and may do so in the future. We utilize these derivatives to partially offset our market exposure to fluctuations in certain foreign currencies. These derivatives are designated as cash flow hedges and typically have maturities of less than one year. Ciena’s foreign currency forward contracts were fully matured as of October 31, 2009. We do not enter into foreign exchange forward or option contracts for trading purposes.
     For the first quartersix months of fiscal 2010, research and development, benefited by approximately $0.8 million due to favorable foreign exchange rates related to the strengthening of the US dollar in relation to the Canadian dollar. During this same period, sales and marketing, and general and administrative expenses, were negatively affected by approximately $6.4 million, $0.2 million, and $0.2 million, respectively, due to unfavorable foreign exchange rates related to the weakening of the USU.S. dollar in relation to the EuroCanadian Dollar, partially offset by approximately $0.6 million and $0.1 million, respectively.favorable foreign exchange rates related to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar in relation to the Euro.
     As of January 31,April 30, 2010, our assets and liabilities related to non-dollar denominated currencies were primarily related to intercompany payables and receivables. We do not enter into foreign exchange forward or option contracts for trading purposes.
Item 4.Item 4. Controls and Procedures

54


Disclosure Controls and Procedures
     As of the end of the period covered by this report, Ciena carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of Ciena’s management, including Ciena’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of Ciena’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Based upon this evaluation, Ciena’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that Ciena’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
     As described above, we acquired the MEN Business on March 19, 2010. We have not fully evaluated the internal control over financial reporting of the acquired MEN Business and, as permitted by SEC rules and regulations, will exclude the MEN Business from our evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting from our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2010. The MEN Business will be part of our evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ending October 31, 2011, in which report we will be initially required to include the acquired business in our annual assessment.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
     There waswere no changechanges in Ciena’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) during the most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Ciena’s internal control over financial reporting.
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.Item 1. Legal Proceedings
     On May 29, 2008, Graywire, LLC filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia against Ciena and four other defendants, alleging, among other things, that certain of the parties’ products infringe U.S. Patent 6,542,673 (the “‘673 Patent”), relating to an identifier system and components for optical assemblies. The complaint, which seeks injunctive relief and damages, was served upon Ciena on January 20, 2009. Ciena filed an answer to the complaint and counterclaims against Graywire on March 26, 2009, and an amended answer and counterclaims on April 17, 2009. On April 27, 2009, Ciena and certain other defendants filed an application for inter partes reexamination of the ‘673 Patent with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (the “PTO”). On the same date, Ciena and the other defendants filed a motion to stay the case pending reexamination of all of the patents-in-suit. On July 17, 2009, the district court granted the defendants’ motion to stay the case. On July 23, 2009, the PTO granted the defendants’ application for reexamination with respect to certain claims of the ‘673 Patent. We believe that we have valid defenses to the lawsuit and intend to defend it vigorously in the event the stay of the case is lifted.
     As a result of our June 2002 merger with ONI Systems Corp., weCiena became a defendant in a securities class action lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in August 2001. The complaint named ONI, certain former ONI officers, and certain underwriters of ONI’s initial public offering (IPO) as defendants, and alleges, among other things, that the underwriter defendants violated the securities laws by failing to disclose alleged compensation arrangements in ONI’s registration statement and by engaging in manipulative practices to artificially inflate ONI’s stock price after the IPO. The complaint also alleges that ONI and the named former officers violated the securities laws by failing to disclose the underwriters’ alleged compensation arrangements and manipulative practices. The former ONI officers have been dismissed from the action without prejudice. Similar complaints have been filed against more than 300 other issuers that have had initial public offerings since 1998, and all of these actions have been included in a single coordinated proceeding. On October 6, 2009, the Court entered an opinion granting final approval to a settlement among the plaintiffs, issuer defendants and underwriter defendants, and directing that the Clerk of the Court close these actions. Notices of appeal of the opinion granting final approval have been filed. A description of this litigation and the history of the proceedings can be found in “Item 3. Legal Proceedings” of Part I of Ciena’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 22, 2009. No specific amount of damages has been claimed in this action. Due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation and because the settlement remains subject to appeal, the ultimate outcome of the matter is uncertain.

41


     In addition to the matters described above, we are subject to various legal proceedings, claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. We do not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material effect on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

55


Item 1A.Item 1A. Risk Factors
Risks relating to our pending acquisitionAcquisition of certainthe Nortel Metro Ethernet Networks (MEN) AssetsBusiness
     During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, we completed our acquisition of the MEN Business. Business combinations of the scale and complexity of this transaction involve a high degree of risk. In addition to the other information contained in this report, youYou should consider the following risk factors related to our pending acquisition of certain Nortel MEN assets before investing in our securities.
We may fail to realize the anticipated benefits and operating synergies expected from the transaction,MEN Acquisition, which could adversely affect our operating results and the market price of our common stock.
     The success of the transactionMEN Acquisition will depend, in significant part, on our ability to successfully integrate the acquired business, grow the combined business’s revenue and realize the anticipated strategic benefits and operating synergies to be derived from the combination of the two businesses.combination. We believe that the additional resources, expanded geographic reach, new and broader customer relationships, and deeper portfolioaddition of complementary network solutions derived from the pending transactionMEN Business will accelerate the execution of our corporate and product development strategy, enable us to compete with larger equipment providers and provide opportunities to optimize our product development investment. Actual cost, operating, strategicAchieving these goals requires growth of the revenue of the MEN Business and realization of the targeted sales synergies if achieved at all, may be lower than we expectfrom our combined customer bases and may take longer to achieve than anticipated. If we are not able to adequately addresssolutions offerings. This growth and the integration challenges above, we may be unable to realize the anticipated benefits of the transaction. The anticipated benefits of the transaction may not be realized fully or at all, or may take longer to realize than expected.we expect. Actual operating, technological, strategic and sales synergies, if achieved at all, may be less significant than we expect or may take longer to achieve than anticipated. If we are not able to achieve these objectives and realize the anticipated benefits and operating synergies of the MEN Acquisition within a reasonable time following the closing, our results of operations and the value of Ciena’s common stock may be adversely affected.
Our pending acquisitionThe MEN Acquisition will result in significant integration costs and any material delays or unanticipated additional expense may harm our business and results of operations.
     We expect theThe complexity and magnitude of the integration effort associated with the MEN Acquisition will be significant and that it will require materialthat Ciena fund significant capital and operating expense by Ciena.to support the integration of the combined operations. We currently expect that integration expense associated with equipment and information technology, costs, transaction expense, and consulting and third party service fees associated with integration, will be approximately $180$180.0 million over a two-year period, with a significant portion of such costs anticipated to be incurred in the first year after completionduring fiscal 2010. We expect to incur additional costs as we build up internal resources, including headcount, facilities and information systems, or engage third party providers, while we continue to rely upon and transition away from support services provided by an affiliate of the transaction. This amount does not give effectNortel during a transition period. In addition to anythese transition costs, we also expect to incur expense relatedrelating to, among other things, facilities restructuring orand increased amortization of intangibles and inventory obsolescence charges. This amount also does not give effect to higher operating expense associated with transition services described below. As a result, the integration expense we incur and recognize for financial statement purposes could be significantly higher. Any material delays or unanticipated additional expense associated with integration activities may harm our business and results of operations.

42


The integration of the acquired assets will be extremelyMEN Business is a complex and involveundertaking, involving a number of risks. Failure to successfully integrate our respective operations, including the underlying information systems,operational risks, and disruptions or delays could significantly harm our business and results of operations.
     Because of the structure of the transaction as an asset carve out from Nortel, upon completion of the transaction we will not be integrating an entire enterprise, with the back-office systems and processes that makesupport the business run, when we complete this transaction.operation of the business. We mustwill be required to add resources and build thenew organizational capacity, grow Ciena’s existing infrastructure, and organizations, andor retain third party services to ensure business continuity and to support and scale our business. Integrating ourAs noted below, we are currently relying upon an affiliate of Nortel to provide critical business support services for a transition period and will ultimately have to transfer these activities to internal or other third party resources. As a result, integrating the operations of the MEN Business will be extremely complex and there is no assurance that we will notcould encounter material disruptions, delays or unanticipated costs that would adversely affect our business and results of operations.costs. Successful integration involves numerous risks, including:
  assimilating product offerings and sales and marketing operations;
 
  coordinating research and development efforts;
 
  retaining and attracting customers following a period of significant uncertainty associated with the acquired business;
 
  diversion of management attention from business and operational matters;
 
  identifying and retaining key personnel;
 
  maintaining and transitioning relationships with key vendors, including component providers, manufacturers and service providers;
 
  integrating accounting, information technology, enterprise management and administrative systems which may be difficult or costly;

56


  making significant cash expenditures that may be required to retain personnel or eliminate unnecessary resources;
 
  managing tax costs or liabilities;
 
  coordinating a broader and more geographically dispersed organization;
 
  maintaining uniform standards, procedures and policies to ensure efficient and compliant administration of the organization; and
 
  making any necessary modifications to internal control to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related rules and regulations.
     DelaysDisruptions or delays associated with these and other risks encountered in the integration process significant cost overruns and unanticipated expense could have a material adverse effect on our operatingbusiness and results and financial condition.of operations.
Following completion of the transaction we willWe rely upon an affiliate of Nortel to perform certain critical transitionbusiness support services during a transition period and there can be no assurance that such services will be performed timely and effectively.
     Following the completion of the transaction, we willWe currently rely upon an affiliate of Nortel for certain transitionkey business support services related to the operation and continuity of the business following completion ofMEN Business. These services will be transferred to and taken over by our organization over time as we build up the transaction.capability and capability to do so. These services include among others, criticalkey finance and accounting functions, relating to accounting,supply chain and logistics management, maintenance and product support services, order management and fulfillment, trade compliance, and information technology customer supportservices. These transition services are costly and facilities. We anticipate thatwe could incur approximately $94.0 million per year, if all of the transition service-related expense will be significant and the administration and oversight of these services will be complex. The transition service provider will be performing services on behalf of Ciena as well as certain other purchasers of those businesses that Nortel has divested in the course of its bankruptcy proceedings.are used for a full year. Relying upon thisthe transition services provider to perform critical operations and services raises a number of significant business and operational risks, including its ability to becomerisks. The transition service provider also performs services on behalf of other purchasers of the businesses that Nortel has recently divested. There is no assurance the provider will serve as an effective support partner for all of the Nortel purchasers segregation of such services, and itswe face risks associated with the provider’s ability to retain experienced and knowledgeable personnel. There canpersonnel as Ciena and other purchasers wind down support services. Ciena’s administration and oversight of these transition services is complex, requires significant resources and presents issues related to the segregation of duties and information among the purchasers. In particular, the wind down and transfer to Ciena or other third parties of these critical services is a complex undertaking and may be no assurance such services will be performed timelydisruptive to our business and effectively.operations. Significant disruption in business support services, the transfer of these transition servicesactivities to Ciena or unanticipated costs related to such services could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
As a consequence of the transaction, we will take on substantial additional indebtedness and materially reduce our cash balance.
     In accordance with the applicable asset purchase agreements, upon completion of the transaction, we will pay the sellers $530 million in cash and issue them $239 million in aggregate principal of senior convertible notes due in fiscal 2017. This cash expenditure will significantly reduce our cash balance. In addition, the terms of the notes to be issued provide for an adjustment of the interest rate up to a maximum of 8% per annum, depending upon the market price of our common stock upon the completion of the transaction. Prior to the closing of the transaction, we may elect to replace some or all of the convertible notes to be issued with cash equal to 102% of the face amount of the notes that are replaced. In light of this option, we continually assess market conditions to determine whether to make this election and access the capital markets for the purposes of funding the election through the issuance of debt securities that may include securities convertible into equity. Regardless of whether we make this election, our lower cash balance and increased indebtedness resulting from this transaction could adversely affect our business. In particular, it could increase our vulnerability to sustained, adverse macroeconomic weakness, limit our ability to obtain further financing and limit our ability to pursue certain operational and strategic opportunities. Our indebtedness and lower cash balance may also put us in a competitive disadvantage to other vendors with greater resources.

43


The transactionMEN Acquisition may expose us to significant unanticipated liabilities that could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
     Our purchase of the acquired business in connection with Nortel’s bankruptcy proceedingsMEN Business may expose us to significant unanticipated liabilities. We may incur unforeseen liabilities relating to the operation of the Nortel business. TheThese liabilities maycould include employment, retirement or severance-related obligations under applicable law or other benefits arrangements, legal claims, warranty or similar liabilities to customers, and claims by or amounts owed to vendors, including as a result of any contracts assigned to Ciena in the transaction.Ciena. We may also incur liabilities or claims associated with our acquisition or licensing of Nortel’s technology and intellectual property including claims of infringement. Particularly in international jurisdictions, our acquisition of Nortel’s assets,the MEN Business, or our decision to independently enter new international markets where Nortel previously conducted business, could also expose us to tax liabilities and other amounts owed by Nortel. The incurrence of such unforeseen or unanticipated liabilities, should they be significant, could have a material adverse affect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The transaction may not be accretive andMEN Acquisition may cause dilution to our earnings per share, which may harm the market price of our common stock.
     We currently anticipate thatA number of factors, including lower than anticipated revenue and gross margin of the transaction will be accretiveMEN Business, or fewer operating synergies of the combined operations, could cause dilution to our earnings per share for fiscal 2011. This expectation is based on preliminary estimates which may materially change afteror decrease or delay the completionaccretive effect of the transaction. We have previously incurred operating expense, on a stand alone basis, higher than we anticipated for periods, including during fiscal 2009. The magnitude of the integration relating to our pending transaction, together with the increased scale of our operations resulting from the transaction, will make forecasting, managing and constraining our operating expense even more difficult.MEN Acquisition. We could also encounter unanticipated or additional transaction and integration-related costs or fail to realize all of the benefits of the transactionMEN Acquisition that underlie our financial model and expectations as tofor future growth and profitability. All of theseThese and other factors could cause dilution to our earnings per share or decrease or delay the expected accretive effectfinancial benefits of the transactionMEN Acquisition and cause a decrease in the price of our common stock.
The complexity of the integration and transition associated with our pending transaction,the MEN Acquisition, together with theCiena’s increased scale of our operations,and global presence, may challengeaffect our internal control over financial reporting and our ability to effectively and timely report our financial results.
     Following the completion of the pending transaction, we willWe currently rely upon a combination of Ciena information systems and critical transition services that are necessary for usprovided by an

57


affiliate of Nortel to accurately and effectively compile and report our financial results. We will also have to train new employees and third party providers, and assume operations in jurisdictions where we have not previously had operations. The additional scale of theseour operations, together with the complexity of the integration effort, including changes to or implementation of critical information technology systems and reliance upon third party transition services, may adversely affect our ability to report our financial results on a timely basis. In addition, we have had to train new employees and third party providers, and assume operations in jurisdictions where we have not previously had operations. We expect that the transactionMEN Acquisition may necessitate significant modifications to our internal control systems, processes and information systems, both on a transition basis, and over the longer-term as we fully integrate the combined company. We cannot be certain that changes to our design for internal control over financial reporting, or the controls utilized by other third parties, will be sufficient to enable management or our independent registered public accounting firm to determine that our internal controls are effective for any period, or on an ongoing basis. If we are unable to accurately and timely report our financial results, or are unable to assert that our internal controls over financial reporting are effective, our business and market perception of our financial condition may be harmed and the trading price of our stock may be adversely affected.
Following our acquisition of the Nortel assets, the combined company must continue to retain, motivate and recruit key executives and employees, which may be difficult in light of uncertainty regarding the pending transaction and the significant integration efforts following closing.
     For the pending transaction to be successful, during the period before the transaction is completed, both Ciena and Nortel must continue to retain, motivate and recruit executives and other key employees. Moreover, following the completion of the transaction, Ciena must be successful at retaining and motivating key employees. Experienced employees, particularly with experience in optical engineering, are in high demand and competition for their talents can be intense. Employees of both companies may experience uncertainty, real or perceived, about their future role with the combined company until, or even after, Ciena’s post-closing strategies are announced or executed. These potential distractions may adversely affect the ability to retain, motivate and recruit executives and other key employees and keep them focused on corporate strategies and objectives. The failure to attract, retain and motivate executives and other key employees before and following completion of the transaction could have a negative impact on Ciena’s business.

44


The pending transaction may not be completed, may be delayed or may result in the imposition of conditions that could have a material adverse effect on Ciena’s operation of the business following completion.
      Completion of the pending transaction is conditioned upon the satisfaction of customary closing conditions and is subject to information and consultation with employee representatives and/or employees in certain international jurisdictions. Ciena has previously been granted early termination of the antitrust waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act and the Canadian Competition Act and has obtained approval under the Investment Canada Act. There can be no assurance that these clearances and approvals will be obtained and that previous clearances will be maintained. Third parties could petition to have governmental entities reconsider previously granted clearances. In addition, the governmental entities from which clearances and approvals are required may impose conditions on the completion of the transaction, require changes to the terms of the transaction or impose restrictions on the operation of the business following completion of the transaction. If the transaction is not completed, completion is delayed or Ciena becomes subject to any material conditions in order to obtain any clearances or approvals required to complete the transaction, its business and results of operations may be adversely affected and its stock price may suffer.
Risks related to our current business and operations
     Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk. In addition to the other information contained in this report, you should consider the following risk factors before investing in our securities.
Our business and operating results could be adversely affected by unfavorable macroeconomic and market conditions and reductions in the level of capital expenditure by our largest customers in response to these conditions.
     StartingBroad macroeconomic weakness has previously resulted in the second halfsustained periods of fiscal 2008,decreased demand for our business beganproducts and services that have adversely affected our operating results. In response to experience the effects of worsening macroeconomic conditions and significant disruptions in the financial and credit markets globally. In the face of these conditions, many companies, including some of our largest communications service provider customers significantly reduced their network infrastructure expenditures as they sought to conserve capital, reduce debt or address uncertainties or changes in their own business models brought on by broader market challenges. Our business experienced lengthening sales cycles, customer delays in network buildouts and slowing deployments, resulting in lower demand across our customer base in all geographies. Our resultsWhile we have seen some signs of operations for fiscal 2009 were materially adversely affected by the weakness, volatility and uncertainty presented by the globalrecovering market conditions thatin North America, we encountered during the year.
     Broadcontinue to experienced depressed demand and lower customer spending in Europe as economic uncertainty and volatile macroeconomic weakness, customer financial difficulties, changes in customer business models and constrained spending on communications networks have previously resulted in sustained periods of decreased demand for our products and services that have adversely affected our operating results. Challengingconditions persist. Continuing or increased challenging economic and market conditions may alsocould result in:
  difficulty forecasting, budgeting and planning due to limited visibility into the spending plans of current or prospective customers;
 
  increased competition for fewer network projects and sales opportunities;
 
  increased pricing pressure, that may adversely affect revenue and gross margin;
 
  higher overhead costs as a percentage of revenue;
 
  increased risk of charges relating to excess and obsolete inventories and the write off of other intangible assets; and
 
  customer financial difficulty and increased risk of doubtfuldifficulty in collecting accounts receivable.
     Our business and financialoperating results are closely tied to the prospects, performance, and financial condition of our largest communications service provider customers and are significantlycould be materially affected by periods of unfavorable macroeconomic and market conditions, globally or industry-wide changes that affect their businessesspecific to a particular region where we operate, and their level of infrastructure-related spending. These factors includeany resulting reductions in the level of enterprise and consumer spending on communications services, adoption of new communications services or applications and consumption of available network capacity. We are uncertain as to how long current unfavorable macroeconomic and industry conditions will persist and the magnitude of their effects oncapital expenditure by our business and results of operations.customers.
A small number of communications service providers account for a significant portion of our revenue. The loss of any of these customers, or a significant reduction in their spending, would have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
     A significant portion of our revenue is concentrated among a relatively small number of communications service providers. Eight customers accounted for greater than 60% of our revenue in fiscal 2009.2009, including AT&T, which represented approximately 19.6% of fiscal 2009 revenue. Consequently, our financial results are closely correlated with the spending of a relatively small number of communications service providers.providers and are significantly affected by market or industry changes that affect their businesses. The terms of our frame contracts generally do not obligate these customers to purchase any minimum or specific amounts of equipment or services. Because their spending may be unpredictable and sporadic, our revenue and operating results can fluctuate on a quarterly basis. Reliance upon a relatively small number of customers increases our exposure to changes in their network and purchasing strategies. Some of our customers are pursuing efforts to outsource the management and operation of their networks, or have indicated a procurement strategy to reduce or rationalize the number of vendors from which they purchase equipment. These strategies may present challenges to our business and could benefit our larger competitors. Our concentration in revenue has increased in recent years, in part, as a result of consolidations among a number of our largest customers. Consolidations may increase the likelihood of temporary or indefinite reductions in

58


customer spending or changes in network strategy that could harm our business and operating results. The loss of one or more large service provider customers, or a significant reduction in their spending, as a result of the factors above or otherwise, would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

45


Our revenue and operating results can fluctuate unpredictably from quarter to quarter.
     Our revenue and results of operations can fluctuate unpredictably from quarter to quarter. Our budgeted expense levels depend in part on our expectations of long-term future revenue and gross margin, and substantial reductions in expense are difficult and can take time to implement. Uncertainty or lack of visibility into customer spending, and changes in economic or market conditions, can make it difficult to prepare reliable estimates of future revenue and corresponding expense levels. Consequently, our level of operating expense or inventory may be high relative to our revenue, which could harm our ability to achieve or maintain profitability. Given market conditions and the effect of cautious spending in recent quarters, lower levels of backlog orders and an increase in the percentage of quarterly revenue relating to orders placed in that quarter could result in more variability and less predictability in our quarterly results.
     Additional factors that contribute to fluctuations in our revenue and operating results include:
  broader economic and market conditions affecting us and our customers;
 
  changes in capital spending by large communications service providers;
 
  the timing and size of orders, including our ability to recognize revenue under customer contracts;
 
  variations in the mix between higher and lower margin products and services; and
 
  the level of pricing pressure we encounter.encounter, particularly for our Packet-Optical Transport platforms.
     Many factors affecting our results of operations are beyond our control, particularly in the case of large service provider orders and multi-vendor or multi-technology network infrastructure builds where the achievement of certain thresholds for acceptance is subject to the readiness and performance of the customer or other providers, and changes in customer requirements or installation plans. As a consequence, our results for a particular quarter may be difficult to predict, and our prior results are not necessarily indicative of results likely in future periods. The factors above may cause our revenue and operating results to fluctuate unpredictably from quarter to quarter. These fluctuations may cause our operating results to be below the expectations of securities analysts or investors, which may cause our stock price to decline.
We face intense competition that could hurt our sales and results of operations.
     The markets in which we compete for sales of networking equipment, software and services are extremely competitive,competitive. Competition is particularly intense in attracting large carrier customers and securing new market opportunities with existing carrier customers. In an effort to secure new or long-term customers and capture market share, in the market for salespast we have and in the future we may agree to large communications service providers.pricing or other terms that result in negative gross margins on a particular order or group of orders. The level of competition and pricing pressure that we face increases substantially during periods of macroeconomic weakness, constrained spending or fewer network projects. As a result of currentrecent market conditions, we have experienced significant competition and increased pricing pressure, particularly for our optical transport products. We face particularly intense competition in our effortsPacket-Optical Transport products, as we and other vendors have sought to attract additional large carrier customers in new geographies and secure newretain or grow market opportunities with existing carrier customers. In an effort to secure attractive long-term customers or new customers, we may agree to pricing or other terms that result in negative gross margins on a particular order or group of orders.share.
     Competition in our markets, generally, is based on any one or a combination of the following factors: price, product features, functionality and performance, introduction of innovative network solutions, manufacturing capability and lead-times, incumbency and existing business relationships, scalability and the flexibility of products to meet the immediate and future network requirements of customers. A small number of very large companies have historically dominated our industry. These competitors have substantially greater financial technical and marketing resources, greater manufacturing capacity, broader product offerings and more established relationships with service providers and other potential customers than we do. Because of their scale and resources, they may be perceived to be better positioned to offer network operating or management service for large carrier customers. Consolidation activity among large networking equipment providers has caused someWe expect that the acquired products and technologies, increased market share and global presence resulting from the MEN Acquisition will only intensify the level of our competitors to grow evencompetition that we face, particularly from larger which may increase their strategic advantages and adversely affect our competitive position.
vendors. We also compete with a number of smaller companies that provide significant competition for a specific product, application, customer segment or geographic market. Due to the narrower focus of their efforts, these competitors may achieve commercial availability of their products more quickly or may be more attractive to customers.
     Increased competition in our markets has resulted in aggressive business tactics, including:
significant price competition, particularly for our Packet-Optical Transport platforms;

4659


significant price competition, particularly from competitors in Asia;
  customer financing assistance;
 
  early announcements of competing products and extensive marketing efforts;
 
  competitors offering equity ownership positions to customers;
 
  competitors offering to repurchase our equipment from existing customers;
 
  marketing and advertising assistance; and
 
  intellectual property assertions and disputes.
     The tactics described above can be particularly effective in an increasingly concentrated base of potential customers such as communications service providers. If competitive pressures increase or we fail to compete successfully in our markets, our sales and profitability would suffer.
Our reliance upon third party manufacturers exposes us to risks that could negatively affect our business and operations.
     We rely upon third party contract manufacturers to perform the majority of the manufacturing of our products and components. In recent years weWe do not have transitioned a significant portioncontracts in place with some of our productmanufacturers, do not have guaranteed supply of components or manufacturing capacity and in some cases are utilizing temporary or transitional commercial arrangements intended to overseas suppliers in Asia, with muchfacilitate the integration of the manufacturing taking place in China and Thailand. Some of our contract manufacturers ship products directly to our customers on behalf of Ciena.MEN Business. Our reliance upon thesethird party manufacturers could expose us to increased risks related to lead times, continued supply, on-time delivery, quality assurance and compliance with environmental standards and other regulations. Reliance upon third parties for manufacture of our products significantlymanufacturers exposes us to risks related to their business,operations, financial position, business continuity and continued viability, which may be adversely affected by broader negative macroeconomic conditions and difficulties in the credit markets. These conditions may disrupt their operations,In an effort to drive cost reductions, we anticipate rationalizing our supply chain and third party contract manufacturers as part of the integration of the MEN Business into Ciena’s operations. There can be no assurance that these efforts, including any consolidation or reallocation the third party sourcing and manufacturing, will not ultimately result in discontinuation of services,additional costs or resultdisruptions in pricing increases that affect our manufacturing requirements. Disruptions to our business could also arise as a result of ineffective business continuityoperations and disaster recovery plans by our manufacturers.business.
     We do not have contracts in place with some of our manufacturers and do not have guaranteed supply of components or manufacturing capacity. We couldmay also experience difficulties as a result of geopolitical events, military actions or health pandemics in the countries where our products or critical components thereof are manufactured. DuringOur product manufacturing principally takes place in Mexico, Canada, Thailand and China. Thailand is undergoing a period of instability and we have in the first quarter of fiscal 2009, protests resultedpast experienced product shipment delays associated with political turmoil in Thailand, including a blockade of Thailand’sits main international airport, which delayed product shipments from one of our key contract manufacturers.airport. Significant disruptions in these countries affecting supply and manufacturing capacity, or other difficulties with our contract manufacturers couldwould negatively affect our business and results of operations.
Investment of research and development resources in technologies for which there is not a matching market opportunity, or failure to sufficiently or timely invest in technologies for which there is market demand, would adversely affect our revenue and profitability.
     The market for communications networking equipment is characterized by rapidly evolving technologies and changes in market demand. We continually invest in research and development to sustain or enhance our existing products and develop or acquire new products technologies. Our current development efforts are focused upon the evolution of our CoreDirector Multiservice Optical Switch family, the expansion of our carrierCarrier Ethernet service deliveryService Delivery and aggregation products, and the extension of our CN 4200 converged optical service delivery portfolio, including40G and 100G coherent technologies and capabilities.capabilities for our Packet-Optical Transport platforms. There is often a lengthy period between commencing these development initiatives and bringing a new or revisedimproved product to market. During this time, technology preferences, customer demand and the market for our products may move in directions we had not anticipated. There is no guarantee that new products or enhancements will achieve market acceptance or that the timing of market adoption will be as predicted. There is a significant possibility, therefore, that some of our development decisions, including oursignificant expenditures on acquisitions, research and development costs, or investments in technologies, will not turn out as anticipated, and that our investment in some projects will be unprofitable. There is also a possibility that we may miss a market opportunity because we failed to invest, or invested too late, in a technology, product or enhancement. Changes in market demand or investment priorities may also cause us to discontinue existing or planned development for new products or features, which can have a disruptive effect on our relationships with customers. These product development risks can be compounded in the context of a significant acquisition such as the MEN Business and decision making regarding our product portfolio and the significant development work required to integrate the combined product and software offerings. If we fail to make the right investments or fail to make them at the right time, our competitive position may suffer and our revenue and profitability could be harmed.
Product performance problems could damage our business reputation and negatively affect our results of operations.

60


     The development and production of highly technical and complex communications network equipment is complicated. Some of our products can be fully tested only when deployed in communications networks or when carrying traffic with other equipment. As a result, product performance problems are often more acute for initial deployments of new products and product enhancements. Our products have contained and may contain undetected hardware or software errors or defects. These defects have resulted in warranty claims and additional costs to remediate. Unanticipated problems can relate to the design, manufacturing, installation or integration of our products. Performance problems and product malfunctions can also relate to defects in components, software or manufacturing services supplied by third parties. Product performance, reliability and quality problems can negatively affect our business, including:

47


  increased costs to remediate software or hardware defects or replace products;
 
  payment of liquidated damages or similar claims for performance failures or delays;
 
  increased inventory obsolescence;
 
  increased warranty expense or estimates resulting from higher failure rates, additional field service obligations or other rework costs related to defects;
 
  delays in recognizing revenue or collecting accounts receivable; and
 
  declining sales to existing customers and order cancellations.
Product performance problems could also damage our business reputation and harm our prospects with potential customers. These consequences of product defects or quality problems, including any significant costs to remediate, could negatively affect our business and results of operations.
Network equipment sales to large communications service providers often involve lengthy sales cycles and protracted contract negotiations and may require us to assume terms or conditions that negatively affect our pricing, payment terms and the timing of revenue recognition.
     Our future success will depend in large part on our ability to maintain and expand our sales to large communications service providers. These sales typically involve lengthy sales cycles, protracted and sometimes difficult contract negotiations, and sales to service providers often involve extensive product testing and network certification, including network-specific or region-specific processes. We are sometimes required to agree to contract terms or conditions that negatively affect pricing, payment terms and the timing of revenue recognition in order to consummate a sale. As a resultDuring periods of currentmacroeconomic or market conditions,weakness, these customers may request extended payment terms, vendor or third-party financing and other alternative purchase structures. These terms may, in turn, negatively affect our revenue and results of operations and increase our risk and susceptibility to quarterly fluctuations in our results. Service providers may ultimately insist upon terms and conditions that we deem too onerous or not in our best interest. Moreover, our purchase agreements generally do not require that a customer guarantee any minimum purchase level and customers often have the right to modify, delay, reduce or cancel previous orders. As a result, we may incur substantial expense and devote time and resources to potential relationships that never materialize or result in lower than anticipated sales.
Difficulties with third party component suppliers, including sole and limited source suppliers, could increase our costs and harm our business and customer relationships.
     We depend on third party suppliers for our product components and subsystems, as well as for equipment used to manufacture and test our products. Our products include key optical and electronic components for which reliable, high-volume supply is often available only from sole or limited sources. WeIncreases in market demand or periods of economic weakness have previously encounteredresulted in shortages in availability for important components that have affected our ability to deliver products in a timely manner. Our business would be negatively affected if one or more of our suppliers were to experience any significant disruption in their operations affecting the price, quality, availability or timely delivery of components. Current unfavorableUnfavorable economic conditions may adverselycan affect the business of our suppliers including theirsuppliers’ liquidity level and ability to continue to invest in their business and to stock components in sufficient quantity. We have seen anexperienced increased lead times and a higher incidence of component discontinuation asdiscontinuation. These difficulties with suppliers alter their businessescould result in lost revenue, additional product costs and deployment delays that could harm our business and customer relationships. We do not have any guarantee of supply from these third parties, and in many cases relating to adjustthe MEN Business, are relying upon temporary or transitional commercial arrangements intended to market conditions.facilitate the integration. As a result, of our reliance on third parties,there is no assurance that we maywill be unableable to secure the components or subsystems that we require in sufficient quantity and quality on reasonable terms. The loss of a source of supply, or lack of sufficient availability of key components, could require us tothat we locate an alternate source or redesign our products, that use those components,each of which wouldcould increase our costs and negatively affect our product gross margin and results of operations. Difficulties with suppliers could also result in lost revenue, additional product costs and deployment delays that could harm ourOur business and customer relationships.results of operations would be negatively affected if we were to experience any significant disruption of difficulties with key suppliers affecting the price, quality, availability or timely delivery of required components.
We may not be successful in selling our products into new markets and developing and managing new sales channels.

61


     We expanded our geographic presence significantly as a result of the MEN Acquisition, and we continue to take steps to sell our products into new geographic markets outside of our traditional markets and to a broader customer base, including other large communications service providers, enterprises, cable operators, wireless operators and federal, state and local governments. WeIn many cases, we have less experience in these markets and in order tocustomers have less familiarity with our company. To succeed in some of these markets we believe we must develop and manage new sales channels and distribution arrangements. We expect these relationships to be an increasingly important part of our business. This strategy may not succeed and we may be exposed to increased expense and legal, business and financial risks associated with entering new markets and pursuing new customer segments through channel partners.

48


     Part of our strategy is to pursueinternationally as well as for sales to federal, state and local governments. These sales require compliance with complex procurement regulations with which we have limited experience. We may be unable to increase our sales to government contractors if we determine that we cannot comply with applicable regulations. Our failure to comply with regulations for existing contracts could result in civil, criminal or administrative proceedings involving fines and suspension, or exclusion, from participation in federal government contracts. Failure to manage additional sales channels effectively would limit our ability to succeed in these new markets and could adversely affect our ability to expand our customer base and grow our business.
We may experience delays in the development of our products that may negatively affect our competitive position and business.
     Our products are based on complex technology, and we can experience unanticipated delays in developing, manufacturing or deploying them. Each step in the development life cycle of our products presents serious risks of failure, rework or delay, any one of which could affect the cost-effective and timely development of our products. IntellectualThe development of our products, including the integration of the products acquired from the MEN Business into our portfolio and the development of an integrated software tool to manage the combined portfolio, present significant complexity. In addition, intellectual property disputes, failure of critical design elements, and other execution risks may delay or even prevent the release of these products. Delays in product development may affect our reputation with customers and the timing and level of demand for our products. If we do not develop and successfully introduce products in a timely manner, our competitive position may suffer and our business, financial condition and results of operations would be harmed.
We may be required to write off significant amounts of inventory as a result of our inventory purchase practices, the convergence of our product lines or unfavorable macroeconomic or industry conditions.
     To avoid delays and meet customer demand for shorter delivery terms, we place orders with our contract manufacturers and suppliers to manufacture components and complete assemblies based on forecasts of customer demand. As a result, our inventory purchases expose us to the risk that our customers either will not order the products we have forecasted or will purchase fewer products than forecasted. Unfavorable market or industry conditions can limit visibility into customer spending plans and compound the difficulty of forecasting inventory at appropriate levels. Moreover, our customer purchase agreements generally do not guarantee any minimum purchase level, and customers often have the right to modify, reduce or cancel purchase quantities. As a result, we may purchase inventory in anticipation of sales that do not occur. Historically, our inventory write-offs have resulted from the circumstances above. As features and functionalities converge across our product lines, and we introduce new products, however, we face an additional risk that customers may forego purchases of one product we have inventoried in favor of another product with similar functionality. If we are required to write off or write down a significant amount of inventory, our results of operations for the period would be materially adversely affected.
Restructuring activities could disrupt our business and affect our results of operations.
     We have previously taken steps, including reductions in force, office closures, and internal reorganizations to reduce the size and cost of our operations and to better match our resources with market opportunities. We may take similar steps in the future.future, particularly as we seek to realize operating synergies and cost reductions associated with our recent acquisition of the MEN Business. These changes could be disruptive to our business and may result in the recording ofsignificant expense including accounting charges includingfor inventory and technology-related write-offs, workforce reduction costs and charges relating to consolidation of excess facilities. Substantial expense or charges resulting from any future restructuring activities could adversely affect our results of operations in the period in which we take such a charge.
Our failure to manage effectively our relationships with third party service partners could adversely impact our financial results and relationship with customers.
     We rely on a number of third party service partners, both domestic and international, to complement our global service and support resources. We rely upon these partners for certain maintenance and support functions, as well as the installation of our equipment in some large network builds. In order to ensure the proper installation and maintenance of our products, we must identify, train and certify qualified service partners. Certification can be costly and time-consuming, and our partners often provide similar services for other companies, including our competitors. We may not be able to manage effectively our relationships with our service partners and cannot be certain that they will be able to deliver services in the manner or time required. If our service partners are unsuccessful in delivering services:
  we may suffer delays in recognizing revenue;
 
  our services revenue and gross margin may be adversely affected; and
 
  our relationship with customers could suffer.

4962


Difficulties with service partners could cause us to transition a larger share of deployment and other services from third parties to internal resources, thereby increasing our services overhead costs and negatively affecting our services gross margin and results of operations.
We may incur significant costs as a result of our efforts to protect and enforce ourOur intellectual property rights or respondmay be difficult and costly to claims of infringement from others.enforce.
     Our business is dependent uponWe generally rely on a combination of patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secret laws to establish and maintain proprietary rights in our products and technology. Although we have been issued numerous patents and other patent applications are currently pending, there can be no assurance that any of these patents or other proprietary rights will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented or that our rights will provide us with any competitive advantage. In addition, there can be no assurance that patents will be issued from pending applications or that claims allowed on any patents will be sufficiently broad to protect our technology. Further, the successful protectionlaws of some foreign countries may not protect our proprietary technology and intellectual property.rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States.
     We are subject to the risk that unauthorizedthird parties may attempt to access, copy or otherwise obtain and use our proprietary technology, particularly as we expand our product development into India and increase our reliance upon contract manufacturers in Asia. These and other international operations could expose us to a lower level of intellectual property protection than inwithout authorization. Protecting against the United States. Monitoring unauthorized use of our products, technology and other proprietary rights is difficult, time-consuming and expensive, and we cannot be certain that the steps that we are taking will prevent or minimize the risks of such unauthorized use. If competitors are ableLitigation may be necessary to useenforce or defend our technology,intellectual property rights or to determine the validity or scope of the proprietary rights of others. Such litigation could result in substantial cost and diversion of management time and resources, and there can be no assurance that we will obtain a successful result. Any inability to protect and enforce our intellectual property rights, despite our efforts, could harm our ability to compete effectively could be harmed.effectively.
We may incur significant costs in response to claims by others that we infringe their intellectual property rights.
     From time to time we have been subjectthird parties may assert claims or initiate litigation or other proceedings related to litigationpatent, copyright, trademark and other intellectual property rights to technologies and related standards that are relevant to our business. These assertions have increased over time due to our growth, the increased number of products and competitors in the communications network equipment industry and the corresponding overlaps, and the general increase in the rate of patent claims assertions, particularly in the United States. Asserted claims, litigation or other proceedings can include claims against us or our manufacturers, suppliers or customers, alleging infringement of third party intellectual property claims, primarily alleging patent infringement. We have also been subject to third party claims arising as a resultproprietary rights with respect our existing or future products and technology or components of our indemnification obligations to customers or resellers that purchase our products or as a resultthose products. Regardless of alleged infringement relating to third party components that we include in our products. The frequencythe merit of these assertions is increasing as patent holders, including entities that are not in our industry and that purchase patents as an investment, use infringement assertions as a competitive tactic or as a source of additional revenue. Intellectual property infringement claims, they can significantlybe time-consuming, divert the time and attention of our technical and management personnel, and result in costly litigation. These claims, if successful, can also require us to pay substantial damages or royalties, enter into costly license agreements or develop non-infringing technology. Accordingly, the costs associated with intellectual property infringement claimsto:
pay substantial damages or royalties;
comply with an injunction or other court order that could prevent us from offering certain of our products;
seek a license for the use of certain intellectual property, which may not be available on commercially reasonable terms or at all;
develop non-infringing technology, which could require significant effort and expense and ultimately may not be successful; and
indemnify our customers pursuant to contractual obligations and pay damages on their behalf.
Any of these events could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
     Our exposure to risks associated with the use of intellectual property may be increased as a result of acquisitions, as we have a lower level of visibility into the development process with respect to such technology or the steps taken to safeguard against the risks of infringing the rights of third parties.
Our international operationsscale could expose usour business to additional risks and result in increased operating expense.expense and adversely affect our results of operations.
     We market, sell and service our products globally. We have established offices around the world, including in North America, Europe, the Middle East, Latin Americaglobally and the Asia Pacific region. We have also establishedrely upon a major development center in India and are increasingly reliant upon overseas suppliers, particularly in Asia,global supply chain for sourcing of important components and manufacturing of our products. Our increasingly global operations may result in increased risk to our business and could give rise to unanticipated expense, difficulties or other effects that could adversely affect our financial results.
International operations are subject to inherent risks, including:
  effects of changes in currency exchange rates;
 
  greater difficulty in collecting accounts receivable and longer collection periods;
 
  difficulties and costs of staffing and managing foreign operations;
 
  the impact of economic conditions in countries outside the United States;
 
  less protection for intellectual property rights in some countries;
 
  adverse tax and customs consequences, particularly as related to transfer-pricing issues;

63


  social, political and economic instability;
 
  higher incidence of corruption;
 
  trade protection measures, export compliance, domestic preference procurement requirements, qualification to transact business and additional regulatory requirements; and
 
  natural disasters, epidemics and acts of war or terrorism.
     We expect that our international activities will be dynamic, and we may enter new markets and withdraw from or reduce operations in others. These changes to our international operations may require significant management attention and result in additional expense. In some countries, our success will depend in part on our ability to form relationships with local partners. Our inability to identify appropriate partners or reach mutually satisfactory arrangements for international sales ofcould adversely affect our productsbusiness and operations. Our global operations may result in increased risk and expense to our business and could impactgive rise to unanticipated liabilities or difficulties that could adversely affect our ability to maintain or increase international market demand for our products.operations and financial results.
Our use and reliance upon development resources in India may expose us to unanticipated costs or liabilities.
     We have a significant development center in India and, in recent years, have increased headcount and development activity at this facility. There is no assurance that our reliance upon development resources in India will enable us to achieve meaningful cost reductions or greater resource efficiency. Further, our development efforts and other operations in India involve significant risks, including:

50


  difficulty hiring and retaining appropriate engineering resources due to intense competition for such resources and resulting wage inflation;
 
  the knowledge transfer related to our technology and resulting exposure to misappropriation of intellectual property or information that is proprietary to us, our customers and other third parties;
 
  heightened exposure to changes in the economic, security and political conditions of India; and
 
  fluctuations in currency exchange rates and tax compliance in India.
     Difficulties resulting from the factors above and other risks related to our operations in India could expose us to increased expense, impair our development efforts, harm our competitive position and damage our reputation.
We may be exposed to unanticipated risks and additional obligations in connection with our resale of complementary products or technology of other companies.
     We have entered into agreements with strategic partners that permit us to distribute their products or technology. We may rely upon these relationships to add complementary products or technologies, or to fulfill an element of our product portfolio. As part of our strategy to diversify our product portfolio, andor address a particular customer base, weor geographic market. We may enter into additional original equipment manufacturer (OEM), resale or resale agreementssimilar arrangements in the future.future, including in support of our selection as a domain supply partner with AT&T. We may incur unanticipated costs or difficulties relating to our resale of third party products. Our third party relationships could expose us to risks associated with the business and viability of such partners, as well as delays in their development, manufacturing or delivery of products or technology. We may also be required by customers to assume warranty, indemnity, service and other commercial obligations greater than the commitments, if any, made to us by our technology partners. Some of our strategic partners are relatively small companies with limited financial resources. If they are unable to satisfy their obligations to us or our customers, we may have to expend our own resources to satisfy these obligations. Exposure to the risks above could harm our reputation with key customers and negatively affect our business and our results of operations.
Our exposure to the credit risks of our customers and resellers may make it difficult to collect receivables and could adversely affect our revenue and operating results.
     In the course of our sales to customers, we may have difficulty collecting receivables and could be exposed to risks associated with uncollectible accounts. We may be exposed to similar risks relating to third party resellers and other sales channel partners. A continued lackLack of liquidity in the capital markets or a sustained period of unfavorable economic conditions may increase our exposure to credit risks. While we monitor these situations carefully and attempt to take appropriate measures to protect ourselves, it is possible that we may have to write down or write off doubtful accounts. Such write-downs or write-offs could negatively affect our operating results for the period in which they occur, and, if large, could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and operating results.
If we are unable to attract and retain qualified personnel, we may be unable to manage our business effectively.
     Competition to attract and retain highly skilled technical, engineering and other personnel with experience in our industry is increasing in intensity,intense and our employees have been the subject of targeted hiring by our competitors. With respect to our engineering resources, we may find it particularly difficult to attract and retain sufficiently skilled personnel in areas including data networking, Ethernet service delivery and network management software engineering in certain geographic markets. We may experience difficulty retaining and motivating existing

64


employees and attracting qualified personnel to fill key positions. As a result of the MEN Acquisition, employees may experience uncertainty, real or perceived, about their role with Ciena as strategies and initiatives relating to combined operations are announced or executed. Because we rely upon equity awards as a significant component of compensation, particularly for our executive team, a lack of positive performance in our stock price, reduced grant levels, or changes to our compensation program may adversely affect our ability to attract and retain key employees. In addition, none of our executive officers is bound by an employment agreement for any specific term. It may be difficult to replace members of our management team or other key personnel, and the loss of such individuals could be disruptive to our business. Because we generally do not haveIn addition, none of our executive officers is bound by an employment contracts with our employees, we must rely upon providing competitive compensation packages and a high-quality work environment in order to retain and motivate employees.agreement for any specific term. If we are unable to attract and retain qualified personnel, we may be unable to manage our business effectively.effectively and our operations and results of operations could suffer.
We may be adversely affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates.
     BecauseAs a significant portion ofglobal concern, we face exposure to adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates. Historically, our sales ishave primarily been denominated in U.S. dollars, an increase in the value of the dollar could increase the real cost to our customersdollars. As a result of our products in markets outsideincreased global presence from the United States.MEN Acquisition, we expect that a larger percentage of our revenue will be non-U.S. dollar denominated and therefore subject to foreign currency fluctuation. In addition, we face exposure to currency exchange rates as a result of our non-U.S. dollar denominated operating expense in Europe, Asia, Latin America and Canada. In recent years, our international operations and our reliance upon international suppliers have grown considerably. A weakened dollar could increase the cost of local operating expenses and procurement of raw materials where we must purchase components in foreign currencies. As a result, we may be susceptible to negative effects of foreign exchange changes. We have previously hedged against currency exposure associated with anticipated foreign currency cash flows and may do so in the future. These hedging activities are intended to offset currency fluctuations on a portion of our non-U.S. dollar denominated operating expense. There can be no assurance that these hedging instruments will be effective in all circumstances and losses associated with these instruments or fluctuations and the adverse effect of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuation may negatively affect our results of operations.

51


Our products incorporate software and other technology under license from third parties and our business would be adversely affected if this technology was no longer available to us on commercially reasonable terms.
     We integrate third-party software and other technology into our embedded operating system, network management system tools and other products. Licenses for this technology may not be available or continue to be available to us on commercially reasonable terms. Third party licensors may insist on unreasonable financial or other terms in connection with our use of such technology. Difficulties with third party technology licensors could result in termination of such licenses, which may result in significant costs and require us to obtain or develop a substitute technology. Difficulty obtaining and maintaining third-party technology licenses may disrupt development of our products and increase our costs, which could harm our business.
Our business is dependent upon the proper functioning of our internal business processes and information systems and modifications to integrate the MEN Business or support future growth may disrupt our business, operating processes and internal controls.
     The successful operation of various internal business processes and information systems is critical to the efficient operation of our business. If these systems fail or are interrupted, our operations may be adversely affected and operating results could be harmed. In recent years, we have experienced considerable growth in transaction volume, headcount and reliance upon international resources in our operations. Our business processes and information systems need to be sufficiently scalable to support the integration of the MEN Business and future growth of our business. To improveThe integration of the efficiencyMEN Business and transfer of business support services being performed under the transition services agreement will require significant modifications relating to our operations and achieve greater automation, we routinely upgradeinternal business processes and information systems. Significant changes to our processes and systems expose us to a number of operational risks. These changes may be costly and disruptive, and could impose substantial demands on management time. These changes may also require the modification of a number of internal control procedures.procedures and significant training of employees. Any material disruption, malfunction or similar problems with our business processes or information systems, or the transition to new processes and systems, could have a negative effect on the operation of our business and our results of operations.
Strategic acquisitions and investments may expose us to increased costs and unexpected liabilities.
     We may acquire, invest in or makeenter in other strategic investments intechnology relationships with other companies to expand the markets we address, diversify our customer base or acquire or accelerate the development of technology or products. To do so, we may use cash, incur debt or assume indebtedness or issue equity that would dilute our current stockholders’ ownership, incur debt or assume indebtedness.ownership. These transactions involve numerous risks, including:
  significant integration costs;
 
  integration and rationalization of operations, products, technologies and personnel;
 
  diversion of management’s attention;
 
  difficulty completing projects of the acquired company and costs related to in-process projects;

65


  the loss of key employees;
 
  ineffective internal controls over financial reporting;
 
  dependence on unfamiliar suppliers or manufacturers;
 
  exposure to unanticipated liabilities, including intellectual property infringement claims; and
 
  adverse tax or accounting effects including amortization expense related to intangible assets and charges associated with impairment of goodwill.
     As a result of these and other risks, ourthese acquisitions or strategic investmentstransactions may not reap the intended benefits and may ultimately have a negative impact on our business, results of operation and financial condition.
Changes in government regulation affecting the communications industry and the businesses of our customers could harm our prospects and operating results.

52


     The Federal Communications Commission, or FCC, has jurisdiction over the U.S. communications industry and similar agencies have jurisdiction over the communication industries in other countries. Many of our largest customers are subject to the rules and regulations of these agencies. Changes in regulatory requirements in the United States or other countries could inhibit service providers from investing in their communications network infrastructures or introducing new services. These changes could adversely affect the sale of our products and services. Changes in regulatory tariff requirements or other regulations relating to pricing or terms of carriage on communications networks could slow the development or expansion of network infrastructures and adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition.
Governmental regulations including in particular those relating toaffecting the use, import or export of our products and regulations related to the environment and potential climate change, could adverselynegatively affect our business and operating results.revenue.
     The United States and various foreign governments have imposed controls, export license requirements and other restrictions on the usage, import or export of some of the technologies that we sell. Governmental regulation of importsusage, import or exports,export of our products, or our failure to obtain required import or export approvalapprovals for our products, could harm our international and domestic sales and adversely affect our revenuesrevenue and costs of sales. Failure to comply with such regulations could result in enforcement actions, fines or penalties and restrictions on export privileges.
In addition, costly tariffs on our equipment, restrictions on importation, trade protection measures and domestic preference requirements of certain countries could limit our access to these markets and harm our sales. For example, India’s government has recently implemented certain rules applicable to non-Indian network equipment vendors and is considering further restrictions that may limit or prohibit sales of certain communications equipment manufactured in China, where certain of our products are assembled.
Governmental regulations related to the environment and potential climate change, could adversely affect our business and operating results.
     Our operations are regulated under various federal, state, local and international laws relating to the environment and potential climate change. We could incur fines, costs related to damage to property or personal injury, and costs related to investigation or remediation activities, if we were to violate or become liable under these laws or regulations. Our product design efforts, and the manufacturing of our products, are also subject to evolving requirements relating to the presence of certain materials or substances in our equipment, including regulations that make producers for such products financially responsible for the collection, treatment and recycling of certain products. For example, our operations and financial results may be negatively affected by environmental regulations, such as the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) and Restriction of the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment (RoHS) that have been adopted by the European Union. Compliance with these and similar environmental regulations may increase our cost of designing, manufacturing, selling and removing our products. These regulations may also make it difficult to obtain supply of compliant components or require us to write off non-compliant inventory, which could have an adverse effect our business and operating results.
We may be required to write down goodwill and long-lived assets and a significantthese impairment chargecharges would adversely affect our operating results.
     At January 31,As of April 30, 2010, we had $152.4our balance sheet includes $40.0 million of goodwill and $682.4 million in long-lived assets, which includes $53.4$517.2 million of intangible assets on our balance sheet.assets. Goodwill relates to the excess of the total purchase price of the MEN Acquisition over the fair value of the net acquired assets. We have incurred significant charges in the past relating to impairment of goodwill that we have acquired from business combinations. Valuation of our long-lived assets requires us to make assumptions about future sales prices and sales volumes for our products. OurThese assumptions are used to forecast future, undiscounted cash flows. Given the current economic environment, uncertainties regarding the durationsignificant uncertainty and severityinstability of thesemacroeconomic conditions in recent periods, forecasting future business is difficult and subject to modification. If actual market conditions differ or our forecasts

66


change, we may be required to reassess long-lived assets and could record an impairment charge. Any impairment charge relating to goodwill or long-lived assets would have the effect of decreasing our earnings or increasing our losses in such period. If we are required to take a substantial impairment charge, our operating results could be materially adversely affected in such period.
Failure to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and stock price.
     Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires that we include in our annual report a report containing management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting as of the end of our fiscal year and a statement as to whether or not such internal controls are effective. Compliance with these requirements has resulted in, and is likely to continue to result in, significant costs and the commitment of time and operational resources. Changes in our business, including the MEN Acquisition, will necessitate ongoing modifications to our internal control systems, processes and information systems. Increases in ourOur increase global operations orand expansion into new regions could pose additional challenges to our internal control systems as these operations become more significant.systems. We cannot be certain that our current design for internal control over financial reporting will be sufficient to enable management or our independent registered public accounting firm to determine that our internal controls are effective for any period, or on an ongoing basis. If we or our independent registered public accounting firms are unable to assert that our internal controls over financial reporting are effective, our business may be harmed. Market perception of our financial condition and the trading price of our stock may be adversely affected, and customer perception of our business may suffer.
Obligations associated with ourOur outstanding indebtedness on our convertible notes and lower cash balance may adversely affect our business.

53


     At January 31,April 30, 2010, indebtedness on our outstanding convertible notes totaled $798.0 million$1.2 billion in aggregate principal. Our use of cash to acquire the MEN Business, together with our private placement of $375.0 million in aggregate principal amount of additional convertible notes in March 2010 to fund in part the purchase price, resulted in significant additional indebtedness and repayment obligationsmaterially reduced our existing cash balance.
Our indebtedness and lower cash balance could have important negative consequences, including:
  increasing our vulnerability to adverse economic and industry conditions;
 
  limiting our ability to obtain additional financing, particularly in light of unfavorable conditions in the credit markets;
 
  reducing the availability of cash resources for other purposes, including capital expenditures;
 
  limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the markets in which we compete; and
 
  placing us at a possible competitive disadvantage to competitors that have better access to capital resources.
     We may also add additional indebtedness such as equipment loans, working capital lines of credit and other long-term debt. We will also likely be incurring additional indebtedness as part of the acquisition of the Nortel assets, whether by issuance to the sellers of the $239 million aggregate principal amount of senior convertible notes provided for in the asset purchase agreements or by issuance of alternative indebtedness should we make the election to increase the cash potion of the purchase price.
Our stock price is volatile.
     Our common stock price has experienced substantial volatility in the past and may remain volatile in the future. Volatility in our stock price can arise as a result of a number of the factors discussed in this “Risk Factors” section. During fiscal 2009, our stock price ranged from a high of $16.64 per share to a low of $4.98 per share. The stock market has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected the market price of many technology companies, with such volatility often unrelated to the operating performance of these companies. Divergence between our actual or anticipated financial results and published expectations of analysts can cause significant swings in our stock price. Our stock price can also be affected by announcements that we, our competitors, or our customers may make, particularly announcements related to acquisitions or other significant transactions. Our common stock is included in a number of market indices and any change in the composition of these indices to exclude our company would adversely affect our stock price. On December 18, 2009, we were removed from the S&P 500, a widely-followed index. These factors, as well as conditions affecting the general economy or financial markets, may materially adversely affect the market price of our common stock in the future.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
     Not applicable.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

67


     Not applicable.
Item 4. Removed and Reserved
Item 5. Other Information
     Not applicable.
Item 6. Exhibits
ExhibitDescription
2.1 Amendment No. 23 dated December 23, 2009March 15, 2010 to that certain Amended & Restated Asset Sale Agreement by and among Nortel Networks Corporation, Nortel Networks Limited, Nortel Networks, Inc. and certain other entities identified therein as sellers and Ciena Corporation, dated as of November 24, 2009, as amended (“Nortel MEN ASA”)+
 
2.2 Amendment No. 4 dated March 15, 2010 to the Nortel MEN ASA+
2.3Amendment No. 5 dated March 19, 2010 to the Nortel MEN ASA+
2.4 Deed of Amendment (Amendment No. 4)5) dated January 13,March 19, 2010 to that certain Asset Sale Agreement (relating to the sale and purchase of certain Nortel assets in Europe, the Middle East and Africa) by and among the Nortel affiliates, Joint Administrators and Joint Israeli Administrators named therein and Ciena Corporation, dated as of October 7, 2009, (“Nortel EMEA ASA”)as amended +

54


ExhibitDescription
 
10.1 LetterLease Agreement dated February 2,as of March 19, 2010 between Ciena Canada, Inc. and Nortel Networks Technology Corp.*
10.2Transition Services Agreement, dated as of March 19, 2010 between Ciena Corporation and Arthur D. Smith, Ph.D., Senior Vice PresidentNortel Networks Corporation and Chief Integration Officer*certain affiliated entities*
 
31.110.3 Intellectual Property License Agreement dated as of March 19, 2010 between Ciena Luxembourg S.a.r.l. and Nortel Networks Limited*
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
*Represents management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
+ Pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K (i) certain schedules and exhibits referenced in this agreement or amendment have been omitted. Ciena hereby agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted exhibit or schedule to the SEC upon request. In addition, representations and warranties included in these asset sale agreements, as amended, were made by the parties to one another in connection with a negotiated transaction. These representations and warranties were made as of specific dates, only for purposes of these agreements and for the benefit of the parties thereto. These representations and warranties were subject to important exceptions and limitations agreed upon by the parties, including being qualified by confidential disclosures, made for the purposes of allocating contractual risk between the parties rather than establishing these matters as facts. These agreements are filed with Ciena’s periodic reports only to provide investors with information regarding its terms and conditions, and not to provide any other factual information regarding Ciena or any other party thereto. Accordingly, investors should not rely on the representations and warranties contained in these agreements or any description thereof as characterizations of the actual state of facts or condition of any party, its subsidiaries or affiliates. The information in these agreements should be considered together with Ciena’s public reports filed with the SEC.
*Certain portions of these documents have been omitted based on a request for confidential treatment submitted to the SEC. The non-public information that has been omitted from these documents has been separately filed with the SEC. Each redacted portion of these documents is indicated by a “[*]” and is subject to the request for confidential treatment submitted to the SEC. The redacted information is confidential information of the Registrant.

5568


SIGNATURES
     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
     
 Ciena Corporation
 
 
Date: March 5,June 10, 2010 By:  /s/ Gary B. Smith   
  Gary B. Smith  
  President, Chief Executive Officer
and Director
(Duly Authorized Officer) 
 
 
   
Date: March 5,June 10, 2010 By:  /s/ James E. Moylan, Jr.   
  James E. Moylan, Jr.  
  Senior Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) 
 

5669