UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(MARK ONE)
   
þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED March 31, 2010
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED September 30, 2010
   
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ___TO __.
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ___TO ___.
Commission File Number: 1-32858
Complete Production Services, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
   
Delaware 72-1503959
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
(I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization) (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
   
11700 Katy Freeway,
Suite 300
Houston, Texas 77079
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:(281) 372-2300
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesþ Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yesoþ Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a small reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filerþAccelerated filero
Non-accelerated filero
Smaller reporting companyo
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Smaller reporting company o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yeso Noþ
Number of shares of the common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the registrant outstanding as of April 27,October 25, 2010: 77,741,68177,901,427
 
 

 


 

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Complete Production Services, Inc.
     
 Page
PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 20093
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Quarters and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 20094
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 20105
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 20096
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements7 
    Page
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
23
  
36
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
36
PART I—FINANCIALII—OTHER INFORMATION
    
     
  
3
4
5
6
737 
     
  1937 
     
  2838 
     
  2938 
     
  38 
     
  3038 
     
  3039 
Item 2.30
Item 3.31
Item 5.31
Item 6.31
32
EX-10.1
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-32.2

2


PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
March 31,September 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009
                
 2010 2009  2010 2009 
 (In thousands, except  (In thousands, except 
 share data)  share data) 
ASSETS
  
Current assets:  
Cash and cash equivalents $105,439 $77,360  $143,265 $77,360 
Accounts receivable, net 206,485 171,284  281,480 171,284 
Inventory, net 34,121 37,464  32,101 37,464 
Prepaid expenses 15,071 17,943  20,839 17,943 
Income tax receivable 56,478 57,606  6,815 57,606 
Current deferred tax assets 8,158 8,158  908 8,158 
Other current assets 163 111  163 111 
          
Total current assets 425,915 369,926  485,571 369,926 
Property, plant and equipment, net 908,692 941,133  913,307 941,133 
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $16,681 and $15,476, respectively 11,597 13,243 
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $7,028 and $6,266, respectively 11,983 12,744 
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $19,775 and $15,476, respectively 8,664 13,243 
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $8,554 and $6,266, respectively 10,457 12,744 
Goodwill 243,823 243,823  249,751 243,823 
Restricted cash 17,000  
Other long-term assets 8,115 7,985  6,122 7,985 
          
Total assets $1,610,125 $1,588,854  $1,690,872 $1,588,854 
          
  
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
  
Current liabilities:  
Current maturities of long-term debt $193 $228  $89 $228 
Accounts payable 32,507 31,745  49,268 31,745 
Accrued liabilities 44,647 41,102  42,653 41,102 
Accrued payroll and payroll burdens 20,593 13,559  27,340 13,559 
Accrued interest 15,778 3,206  15,655 3,206 
Notes payable  1,069   1,069 
Income taxes payable 221 813  589 813 
          
Total current liabilities 113,939 91,722  135,594 91,722 
Long-term debt 650,000 650,002  650,000 650,002 
Deferred income taxes 146,415 148,240  148,210 148,240 
          
Total liabilities 910,354 889,964  933,804 889,964 
Commitments and contingencies  
Stockholders’ equity:  
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share, 200,000,000 shares authorized, 75,922,199 (2009 — 75,278,406) issued 759 752 
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share, 200,000,000 shares authorized, 76,180,549 (2009 — 75,278,406) issued and outstanding 762 752 
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share, 5,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding      
Additional paid-in capital 640,321 636,904  649,183 636,904 
Retained earnings 39,245 42,007  87,946 42,007 
Treasury stock, 164,575 (2009 — 54,313) shares at cost  (1,717)  (334)
Treasury stock, 167,207 (2009 — 54,313) shares at cost  (1,752)  (334)
Accumulated other comprehensive income 21,163 19,561  20,929 19,561 
          
Total stockholders’ equity 699,771 698,890  757,068 698,890 
          
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $1,610,125 $1,588,854  $1,690,872 $1,588,854 
          
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

3


COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Quarters and Nine Months Ended March 31,September 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
        
 Quarters Ended                 
 March 31,  Quarter Ended Nine Months Ended 
 2010 2009  September 30, September 30, 
 (In thousands, except per  2010 2009 2010 2009 
 share data)  (In thousands, except per share data) 
Revenue:  
Service $301,392 $322,917  $410,057 $223,429 $1,062,354 $767,496 
Product 8,312 13,764  8,552 6,484 26,204 37,496 
              
 309,704 336,681  418,609 229,913 1,088,558 804,992 
Service expenses 206,820 211,213  257,487 157,708 687,872 519,694 
Product expenses 6,124 10,495  6,346 4,596 19,793 28,583 
Selling, general and administrative expenses 40,852 49,278  41,790 45,204 126,658 140,115 
Depreciation and amortization 45,319 51,689  44,805 50,379 135,596 153,470 
Impairment loss  36,158  36,158 
              
Income before interest and taxes 10,589 14,006 
Income (loss) before interest and taxes 68,181  (64,132) 118,639  (73,028)
Interest expense 14,741 14,458  14,152 13,987 43,653 42,344 
Interest income  (48)  (10)  (57)  (13)  (200)  (43)
              
Loss before taxes  (4,104)  (442)
Income (loss) before taxes 54,086  (78,106) 75,186  (115,329)
Taxes  (1,342)  (106) 21,056  (26,081) 29,247  (37,136)
              
Net loss $(2,762) $(336)
Net income (loss) $33,030 $(52,025) $45,939 $(78,193)
              
  
Loss per share information: 
Basic loss per share $(0.04) $(0.00)
Earnings (loss) per share information: 
Basic earnings (loss) per share $0.43 $(0.69) $0.60 $(1.04)
              
  
Diluted loss per share $(0.04) $(0.00)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share $0.42 $(0.69) $0.59 $(1.04)
              
  
Weighted average shares:  
Basic 75,699 74,895  76,130 75,200 75,957 75,045 
Diluted 75,699 74,895  77,792 75,200 77,395 75,045 
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive LossIncome (Loss)
Quarters and Nine Months Ended March 31,September 30, 2010 and 2009
(unaudited)
         
  Quarters Ended 
  March 31, 
  2010  2009 
  (In thousands) 
Net loss $(2,762) $(336)
Change in cumulative translation adjustment  1,602   (1,292)
       
Comprehensive loss $(1,160) $(1,628)
       
                 
  Quarter Ended  Nine Months Ended 
  September 30,  September 30, 
  2010  2009  2010  2009 
  (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
Net income (loss) $33,030  $(52,025) $45,939  $(78,193)
Change in cumulative translation adjustment  1,309   3,002   1,368   5,346 
             
Comprehensive income (loss) $34,339  $(49,023) $47,307  $(72,847)
             
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

4


COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity
QuarterNine Months Ended March 31,September 30, 2010 (unaudited)
                            
 Accumulated                               
 Additional Other    Accumulated   
 Number Common Paid-in Retained Treasury Comprehensive    Additional Other   
 of Shares Stock Capital Earnings Stock Income Total  Number Common Paid-in Retained Treasury Comprehensive   
 (In thousands, except share data)  of Shares Stock Capital Earnings Stock Income Total 
  (In thousands, except share data) 
Balance at December 31, 2009 75,278,406 $752 $636,904 $42,007 $(334) $19,561 $698,890  75,278,406 $752 $636,904 $42,007 $(334) $19,561 $698,890 
Net loss     (2,762)    (2,762)
Net income    45,939   45,939 
Cumulative translation adjustment      1,602 1,602       1,368 1,368 
Issuance of common stock:  
Exercise of stock options 86,129  696    696  336,747 3 3,103    3,106 
Expense related to employee stock options   750    750    1,831    1,831 
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation   94    94    612    612 
Purchase of treasury shares  (110,262)    (1,383)   (1,383)  (112,894)     (1,418)   (1,418)
Vested restricted stock 667,926 7  (7)      678,290 7  (7)     
Amortization of non-vested restricted stock   1,884    1,884    6,740    6,740 
                              
Balance at March 31, 2010 75,922,199 $759 $640,321 $39,245 $(1,717) $21,163 $699,771 
Balance at September 30, 2010 76,180,549 $762 $649,183 $87,946 $(1,752) $20,929 $757,068 
                              
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

5


COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
QuartersNine Months Ended March 31,September 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
                
 Quarters Ended  Nine Months Ended 
 March 31,  September 30, 
 2010 2009  2010 2009 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
Cash provided by (used in): 
Cash provided by: 
Operating activities:  
Net loss $(2,762) $(336)
Net income (loss) $45,939 $(78,193)
Items not affecting cash:  
Depreciation and amortization 45,319 51,689  135,596 153,470 
Impairment loss  36,158 
Deferred income taxes  (1,485) 4,837  7,575 2,491 
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation  (94)  (15)  (612)  (106)
Non-cash compensation expense 2,634 3,460  8,571 9,571 
Loss on non-monetary asset exchange  4,868 
Provision for bad debt expense 150 1,497 
(Gain) loss on non-monetary asset exchange  (458) 4,868 
(Recoveries of) provision for bad debt expense  (158) 9,311 
Provision for write-off of note receivable 1,926  
(Gain) loss on the disposal of assets  (94) 7,637 
Other 794 803  2,288 1,412 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:  
Accounts receivable  (34,289) 99,811   (109,824) 173,370 
Inventory 3,391  (11,270) 5,606 1,666 
Prepaid expense and other current assets 2,835 6,535   (2,935) 14,536 
Accounts payable 741  (27,139) 17,480  (33,702)
Income taxes 50,410  (27,672)
Restricted cash  (17,000)  
Accrued liabilities and other 23,247  (2,384) 27,130  (4,754)
          
Net cash provided by operating activities 40,481 132,356  171,440 270,063 
  
Investing activities:  
Additions to property, plant and equipment  (11,343)  (12,828)  (89,855)  (29,094)
Acquisitions  (21,332)  
Proceeds from disposal of capital assets 518 7,156  4,436 20,155 
          
Net cash used in investing activities  (10,825)  (5,672)  (106,751)  (8,939)
  
Financing activities:  
Issuances of long-term debt  3,146   3,204 
Repayments of long-term debt  (37)  (123,047)  (141)  (200,454)
Repayment of notes payable  (1,069)  (1,353)  (1,069)  (6,241)
Proceeds from issuances of common stock 696 25  3,106 197 
Purchase of treasury shares  (1,383)  (68)  (1,418)  (126)
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation 94 15  612 106 
          
Net cash used in financing activities  (1,699)  (121,282)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 1,090  (203,314)
  
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash 122 286  126  (167)
          
Change in cash and cash equivalents 28,079 5,688  65,905 57,643 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 77,360 19,090  77,360 18,500 
          
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $105,439 $24,778  $143,265 $76,143 
          
  
Supplemental cash flow information:  
Cash paid for interest, net of interest capitalized $1,384 $701  $28,489 $26,744 
Cash paid (refund received) for income taxes $(660) $2,697  $(29,033) $(17,064)
Note issued to finance insurance premiums $ $7,960 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

6


COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited, in thousands, except share and per share data)
1. General:
(a) Nature of operations:
     Complete Production Services, Inc. is a provider of specialized services and products focused on developing hydrocarbon reserves, reducing operating costs and enhancing production for oil and gas companies. Complete Production Services, Inc. focuses its operations on basins within North America and manages its operations from regional field service facilities located throughout the U.S. Rocky Mountain region, Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana, Arkansas, Pennsylvania, western Canada, Mexico and Southeast Asia.
     References to “Complete,” the “Company,” “we,” “our” and similar phrases used throughout this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q relate collectively to Complete Production Services, Inc. and its consolidated affiliates.
     On April 21, 2006, our common stock began trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “CPX”.
(b) Basis of presentation:
     The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements reflect all normal recurring adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the financial position of Complete as of March 31,September 30, 2010 and the statements of operations and the statements of comprehensive income for the quarters and nine-month periods ended March 31,September 30, 2010 and 2009, as well as the statement of stockholders’ equity for the quarternine months ended March 31,September 30, 2010 and the statements of cash flows for the quartersnine months ended March 31,September 30, 2010 and 2009. Certain information and disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’sour Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 19, 2010. We believe that these financial statements contain all adjustments necessary so that they are not misleading.
     In preparing financial statements, we make informed judgments and estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and affect the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. We review our estimates on an on-going basis, including those related to impairment of long-lived assets and goodwill, contingencies and income taxes. Changes in facts and circumstances may result in revised estimates and actual results may differ from these estimates.
     The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that could be expected for the full year.
2. Accounts receivable:Business combinations:
         
  March 31,  December 31, 
  2010  2009 
Trade accounts receivable $172,682  $155,871 
Related party receivables  14,561   6,593 
Unbilled revenue  27,535   19,409 
Other receivables  2,647   1,975 
       
   217,425   183,848 
Allowance for doubtful accounts  10,940   12,564 
       
  $206,485  $171,284 
       
     On May 11, 2010, we acquired certain assets of a provider of gas lift services based in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma for $1,365 in cash, subject to an additional $75 holdback. We recorded goodwill totaling $1,017 in conjunction with this acquisition which has been allocated entirely to the completion and production services business segment. We believe this acquisition supplements our plunger lift service offering for the completion and production services business segment.
     On September 3, 2010, we completed the purchase of assets associated with the well service and fluid handling operations of DHW Well Service, Inc, a well service and fluid handling service provider based in Carrizo Springs, Texas. The total purchase price for the assets was $19,967, subject to an

7


additional $1,000 holdback, and included goodwill of $4,911, all of which was allocated to the completion and production services business segment. We believe this acquisition enhances our position in the Eagle Ford Shale in south Texas.
     We accounted for each of these acquisitions using the purchase method of accounting, whereby the purchase price was allocated to the fair value of net assets acquired, including intangibles and property, plant and equipment at depreciated replacement costs, with the excess recorded as goodwill. Results for these acquired businesses were included in our accounts and results of operations since the date of acquisition. The following table summarizes our preliminary purchase price allocations for these acquisitions as of September 30, 2010:
     
Net assets acquired: ��  
Property, plant and equipment $15,538 
Inventory  322 
Accrued liabilities  (956)
Intangible assets  500 
Goodwill  5,928 
    
Net assets acquired $21,332 
    
Consideration:    
Cash, net of cash and cash equivalents acquired $21,332 
    
     The purchase price of these acquired businesses was negotiated as an arm’s length transaction with the seller. We use various valuation techniques, including an earnings multiple approach, to evaluate acquisition targets. We also consider precedent transactions which we have undertaken and similar transactions of others in our industry. To determine the fair value of assets acquired, we generally retain third-party consultants to assist with the valuation of identifiable intangible assets and to evaluate property, plant and equipment acquired based upon, at minimum, the replacement cost of the assets. Working capital items are deemed to be acquired at fair market value.
3. Accounts receivable:
         
  September 30,  December 31, 
  2010  2009 
Trade accounts receivable $215,229  $155,871 
Related party receivables  26,156   6,593 
Unbilled revenue  45,380   19,409 
Other receivables  961   1,975 
       
   287,726   183,848 
Allowance for doubtful accounts  6,246   12,564 
       
  $281,480  $171,284 
       
     Of the related party receivables at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, $24,609 and $5,968, respectively, related to amounts due from a company for which one of our directors has an ownership interest and serves as chief executive officer and chairman of the board.
4. Inventory:
         
  September 30,  December 31, 
  2010  2009 
Finished goods $21,100  $23,435 
Manufacturing parts, materials and other  13,046   14,486 
Work in process  465   431 
       
   34,611   38,352 
Inventory reserves  2,510   888 
       
  $32,101  $37,464 
       

8


3. Inventory:
         
  March 31,  December 31, 
  2010  2009 
Finished goods $20,812  $23,435 
Manufacturing parts, materials and other  13,683   14,486 
Work in process  557   431 
       
   35,052   38,352 
Inventory reserves  931   888 
       
  $34,121  $37,464 
       
4.5. Property, plant and equipment:
                        
 Accumulated    Accumulated   
March 31, 2010 Cost Depreciation Net Book Value 
September 30, 2010 Cost Depreciation Net Book Value 
Land $9,135 $ $9,135  $9,963 $ $9,963 
Buildings 30,146 3,475 26,671  30,963 4,034 26,929 
Field equipment 1,303,698 535,629 768,069  1,352,426 601,081 751,345 
Vehicles 124,983 57,650 67,333  128,877 63,784 65,093 
Office furniture and computers 17,114 9,683 7,431  17,427 10,858 6,569 
Leasehold improvements 25,146 5,044 20,102  25,760 6,299 19,461 
Construction in progress 9,951  9,951  33,947  33,947 
              
 $1,520,173 $611,481 $908,692  $1,599,363 $686,056 $913,307 
              
             
      Accumulated    
December 31, 2009 Cost  Depreciation  Net Book Value 
Land $8,884  $  $8,884 
Buildings  30,200   3,168   27,032 
Field equipment  1,293,292   497,632   795,660 
Vehicles  126,256   55,035   71,221 
Office furniture and computers  17,087   9,108   7,979 
Leasehold improvements  25,006   4,771   20,235 
Construction in progress  10,122      10,122 
          
  $1,510,847  $569,714  $941,133 
          
     Construction in progress at March 31,September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 primarily included progress payments to vendors for equipment to be delivered in future periods and component parts to be used in the final assembly of operating equipment, which in all cases were not yet placed into service at the time. For the quarter and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2010, we recorded capitalized interest of $79$583 and $773, respectively, related to assets that we are constructing for internal use and amounts paid to vendors under progress payments for assets that are being constructed on our behalf.
     Effective March 1, 2009, our Canadian subsidiary transferred certain property, plant and equipment used in our production testing business to Enseco, a competitor, in exchange for certain electric line (e-line) equipment. This exchange was determined to have commercial substance for us and therefore6. Long-term notes receivable:
     On October 31, 2006, we recordedcompleted the new assets acquired at the fair market value of the assets surrendered which had a carrying value of $9,284. We incurred costs to sell totaling approximately $71. We determined the fair value of the assets with the assistancesale of a third-party appraiser, assumingdisposal group which included certain manufacturing and production enhancement product operations of a subsidiary located in Alberta, Canada, as well as operations in south Texas. We sold this disposal group to an orderly liquidation methodology,oilfield service company located in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. In conjunction with this asset disposal, the buyer issued a note to us for $2,000 denominated in Canadian dollars. During the second quarter of 2010, we were notified that the buyer was in default on a term loan and security agreement which was senior to our note. Therefore, management recorded a provision of $1,926 for bad debt associated with this note during June 2010, but we will continue to pursue our interest in this note to the extent a portion may be $4,487, resultingrecoverable in a loss on the exchange of $4,868. Of the total value assigned to the new assets, $4,209 was included in property, plant and equipment and $279 was included in inventory in the accompanying balance sheet as of December 31, 2009. The fair market value of the assets received was determined to be $5,497, using the same methodology applied to the assets surrendered. We believe that these e-line assets will generate cash flows in excess of the cash flows that would have been received from the production testing assets due to relatively higher demand from our customers for e-line services.future period.
5.7. Notes payable:
     We entered into a note arrangement to finance certain of our annual insurance premiums for the policy term beginningfrom December 1, 2007 and extending throughto April 30, 2009. Effective May 1, 2009, we renewed our insurance policies and entered into a similar financing arrangement for the twelve-month policy term which extended through April 2010. We recorded a note payable of $7,960. The balance of this note at December 31, 2009 was $1,069. We repaid this amount in January 2010, resulting in a zero balance at March 31, 2010. We haveConcurrently, we renewed our workers’ compensation, general liability and auto insurance policies through our insurance broker for the same policy term. Our accounting policy has been to record a prepaid asset associated with certain of these policies which is amortized over the term and which takes into account actual premium payments and deposits made to date, to record an accrued liability for premiums which are contractually committed for the policy term and to make monthly premium payments in accordance with our premium commitments and monthly note payments for amounts financed. Effective May 1, 2010, we renewed our annual insurance premiums for the policy term May 1, 2010 through April 30, 2011, but chose to prepay our premiums which had been financed through a note arrangement in prior renewals. As a result, we recorded a prepaid asset of $4,267 in May 2010 associated with these renewals. We will continue to make monthly premium payments through our broker for our workers’ compensation, general liability and auto insurance policies during this twelve-month policy term.

89


with our insurance policies. Our primary insurance policies extend through April 30, 2010 and we expect to renew these policies effective May 1, 2010.
6.8. Long-term debt:
     The following table summarizes long-term debt as of March 31,September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
                
 2010 2009  2010 2009 
U.S. revolving credit facility (a) $ $  $ $ 
Canadian revolving credit facility (a)      
8.0% senior notes (b) 650,000 650,000  650,000 650,000 
Capital leases and other 193 230  89 230 
          
 650,193 650,230  650,089 650,230 
Less: current maturities of long-term debt and capital leases 193 228  89 228 
          
 $650,000 $650,002  $650,000 $650,002 
          
 
(a) We maintain a senior secured facility (the “Credit Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as U.S. Administrative Agent, HSBC Bank Canada, as Canadian Administrative Agent, and certain other financial institutions. On October 13, 2009, we entered into the Third Amendment (the Credit Agreement after giving effect to the Third Amendment, the “Amended Credit Agreement”) and modified the structure of our existing credit facility to an asset-based facility subject to borrowing base restrictions. In connection with the Third Amendment, Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC (formerly known as Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC) replaced Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as U.S. Administrative Agent and also serves as U.S. Issuing Lender and U.S. Swingline Lender under the Amended Credit Agreement. The Amended Credit Agreement provides for a U.S. revolving credit facility of up to $225,000 that matures in December 2011 and a Canadian revolving credit facility of up to $15,000 (with Integrated Production Services Ltd., one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, as the borrower thereof (“Canadian Borrower”)) that matures in December 2011. The Amended Credit Agreement includes a provision for a “commitment increase”, as defined therein, which permits us to effect up to two separate increases in the aggregate commitments under the Amended Credit Agreement by designating one or more existing lenders or other banks or financial institutions, subject to the bank’s sole discretion as to participation, to provide additional aggregate financing up to $75,000, with each committed increase equal to at least $25,000 in the U.S., or $5,000 in Canada, and in accordance with other provisions as stipulated in the Amended Credit Agreement. Certain portions of the credit facilities are available to be borrowed in U.S. dollars, Canadian dollars and other currencies approved by the lenders.
 
  We were in compliance withnot subject to the fixed charge coverage ratio covenant in the Amended Credit Agreement as of March 31, 2010.September 30, 2010 since the Excess Availability Amount plus Qualified Cash Amount (each as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement) exceeded $50,000. If we had been subject to the fixed charge coverage ratio covenant at September 30, 2010, we would have been in compliance. For a discussion of the methodology to calculate the borrowing base for the U.S. and Canadian portions of the facility, as well as our debt covenant requirements, prepayment options and potential exposure in the event of a default under the Amended Credit Agreement, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K as of December 31, 2009.
 
  All of the obligations under the U.S. portion of the Amended Credit Agreement are secured by first priority liens on substantially all of our assets and the assets of our U.S. subsidiaries as well as a pledge of approximately 66% of the stock of our first-tier foreign subsidiaries. Additionally, all of the obligations under the U.S. portion of the Amended Credit Agreement are guaranteed by substantially all of our U.S. subsidiaries. The obligations under the Canadian portion of the Amended Credit Agreement are secured by first priority liens on substantially all of our assets and the assets of our subsidiaries (other than our Mexican subsidiary). Additionally, all of the obligations under the Canadian portion of the Amended Credit Agreement are guaranteed by us as well as certain of our subsidiaries.
 
  Subject to certain limitations set forth in the Amended Credit Agreement, we have the ability to elect how interest under the Amended Credit Agreement will be computed. Interest under the Amended Credit Agreement may be determined by reference to (1) the London Inter-bank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, plus an applicable margin between 3.75% and 4.25% per annum (with the

910


  applicable margin depending upon our “excess availability amount”, as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement) or (2) the “Base Rate” (which means the higher of the Prime Rate, Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%, 3-month LIBOR plus 1.00% and 3.50%), plus the applicable margin, as described above. For the period from the effective date of the Third Amendment until the six month anniversary of the effective date of the Third Amendment, interest will bewas computed as described above with an applicable margin rate of 4.00%. If an event of default exists or continues under the Amended Credit Agreement, advances will bear interest as described above with an applicable margin rate of 4.25% plus 2.00%. Additionally, if an event of default exists under the Amended Credit Agreement, as defined therein, the lenders could accelerate the maturity of the obligations outstanding thereunder and exercise other rights and remedies. Interest is payable monthly.
 
  There were no borrowings outstanding under our U.S. or Canadian revolving credit facilities as of or during the quarter ended March 31,September 30, 2010. There were letters of credit outstanding under the U.S. revolving portion of the facility totaling $54,649,$26,381, which reduced the available borrowing capacity as of March 31,September 30, 2010. We incurred fees related to our letters of credit foras of September 30, 2010 at 4.0% per annum. For the quarternine months ended March 31,September 30, 2010, which wasfees related to our letters of credit were calculated using a 360-day provision, at 4.1% per annum. The availability of the U.S. and Canadian revolving credit facilities is determined by our borrowing base less any borrowings and letters of credit outstanding. The net excess availability under our borrowing base calculations for the U.S. and Canadian revolving facilities at March 31,September 30, 2010 was $104,370$183,898 and $9,932,$6,965, respectively.
 
  The primary purpose of our letters of credit is to secure potential future claim liability which may be incurred by our insurance providers. During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, we negotiated a reduction in our letter of credit requirements of $5,569. In addition, we placed $17,000 in escrow as a compensating balance, effectively cash collateralizing a portion of our letters of credit, in order to better utilize excess cash and reduce interest expense. This compensating balance has been recorded as a long-term asset called “Restricted Cash” on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2010.
We will incur unused commitment fees under the Amended Credit Agreement ranging from 0.50% to 1.00% based on the average daily balance of amounts outstanding. The unused commitment fees were calculated at 1.00% as of March 31,September 30, 2010.
 
(b) On December 6, 2006, we issued 8.0% senior notes with a face value of $650,000 through a private placement of debt. These notes mature in 10 years, on December 15, 2016, and require semi-annual interest payments, paid in arrears and calculated based on an annual rate of 8.0%, on June 15 and December 15, of each year, which commenced on June 15, 2007. There was no discount or premium associated with the issuance of these notes. The senior notes are guaranteed by all of our current domestic subsidiaries. The senior notes have covenants which, among other things: (1) limit the amount of additional indebtedness we can incur; (2) limit restricted payments such as a dividend; (3) limit our ability to incur liens or encumbrances; (4) limit our ability to purchase, transfer or dispose of significant assets; (5) limit our ability to purchase or redeem stock or subordinated debt; (6) limit our ability to enter into transactions with affiliates; (7) limit our ability to merge with or into other companies or transfer all or substantially all of our assets; and (8) limit our ability to enter into sale and leaseback transactions. We have the option to redeem all or part of these notes on or after December 15, 2011. Additionally, we may redeem some or all of the notes prior to December 15, 2011 at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes plus a make-whole premium.
 
  Pursuant to a registration rights agreement with the holders of our 8.0% senior notes, on June 1, 2007, we filed a registration statement on Form S-4 with the SEC which enabled these holders to exchange their notes for publicly registered notes with substantially identical terms. These holders exchanged 100% of the notes for publicly traded notes on July 25, 2007. On August 28, 2007, we entered into a supplement to the indenture governing the 8.0% senior notes, whereby additional domestic subsidiaries became guarantors under the indenture. Effective April 1, 2009, we entered into a second supplement to this indenture whereby additional domestic subsidiaries became guarantors under the indenture.

11


7.9. Stockholders’ equity:
(a) Stock-based Compensation—Stock Options:
     We maintain option plans under which we grant stock-based compensation to employees, officers and directors to purchase our common stock. The exercise price of each option is based on the fair value of the company’s stock at the date of grant. Options may be exercised over a five or ten-year period and generally a third of the options vest on each of the first three anniversaries from the grant date. Upon exercise of

10


stock options, we issue our common stock.
     We calculate stock compensation expense for our stock-based compensation awards by measuring the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award, with limited exceptions, by using an option pricing model to determine fair value. A further description can be found in our Annual Report on Form 10-K as of December 31, 2009.
     Effective January 29, 2010, the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors approved the annual grant of stock options and non-vested restricted stock to certain employees, officers and directors. Pursuant to this authorization, we issued 790,396 shares of non-vested restricted stock on January 29, 2010 at a grant price of $12.53 per share. We expect to recognize compensation expense associated with these grants of non-vested restricted stock totaling $9,904$9,904. Subsequent to the annual grant on January 29, 2010, we have granted an additional 18,700 shares of non-vested restricted stock at an average price of $16.45 and expect to recognize compensation expense of $308 associated with these grants ratably over the three-year vesting periods. In addition, we granted 5,000 and 2,400 shares of non-vested restricted stock on March 1, 2010 and March 8, 2010, at a grant price of $14.50 and $14.98, respectively. We expect to recognize compensation expense of $108 associated with these March 2010 grants.
     On January 29, 2010, we granted 510,300 stock options to purchase shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $12.53 per share. We will recognize compensation expense associated with these stock option grants ratably over the three-year vesting period. The fair value of the stock options granted during the quarternine months ended March 31,September 30, 2010 was determined by applying a Black-Scholes option pricing model based on the following assumptions:
     
  QuarterNine Months Ended
  March 31,September 30,
Assumptions: 2010
Assumptions:
Risk-free rate 1.38% to 2.34%
Expected term (in years)  3.7 to 5.1 
Volatility  50.4%50.4%
Calculated fair value per option $4.83 to $5.81 
     We calculated an average volatility factor for our common stock for the three-year period just prior to the grant date of thisthe award. This volatility calculation was used to compute the calculation of the fair market value of stock option grants made during the quarternine months ended March 31,September 30, 2010.
     We projected a rate of stock option forfeitures based upon historical experience and management assumptions related to the expected term of the options. After adjusting for these forfeitures, we expect to recognize expense totaling $2,635 over the vesting period of these 2010 stock option grants. For the quarter and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2010, we have recognized expense related to these stock option grants totaling $151,$220 and $588, respectively, which represents a reduction of net income before taxes. The impact on the net lossincome for the quarter and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2010 was an increasea decrease of $102,$134 and $359, respectively, with no impact on diluteda $0.01 reduction in earnings per share as reported.for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010. The unrecognized compensation costs related to the non-vested portion of these awards was $2,484$2,047 as of March 31,September 30, 2010 and will be recognized over the applicable remaining vesting periods.
     For the quarters ended March 31,September 30, 2010 and 2009, we recognized compensation expense associated with all stock option awards totaling $750$488 and $1,338,$869, respectively, resulting in a decrease in net income of $298 and an increase in net loss of $504 and $1,017, respectively, and$579, respectively. The impact of this compensation expense on earnings per share was a $0.01 reduction in earnings per share for eachthe quarter ended September 30, 2010 and a $0.01 increase in loss per share for the quarter ended September 30, 2009. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, we recognized compensation expense associated with all stock option awards totaling $1,831 and $3,259, respectively, resulting in a

12


decrease in net income of $1,118 and an increase in net loss of $2,210, respectively. This resulted in a $0.02 reduction in earnings per share for the quartersnine months ended March 31,September 30, 2010 and a $0.03 reduction in earnings per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Total unrecognized compensation expense associated with outstanding stock option awards at March 31,September 30, 2010 was $3,921$2,837 or $2,639,$1,733, net of tax.
     The following tables provide a roll forward of stock options from December 31, 2009 to March 31,September 30, 2010 and a summary of stock options outstanding by exercise price range at March 31,September 30, 2010:
                
 Options Outstanding Options Outstanding
 Weighted Weighted
 Average Average
 Exercise Exercise
 Number Price Number Price
Balance at December 31, 2009 3,383,620 $13.09  3,383,620 $13.09 
Granted 510,300 $12.53  510,300 $12.53 
Exercised  (86,129) $8.10   (336,747) $9.23 
Cancelled  (48,773) $11.58   (151,805) $18.41 
      
Balance at March 31, 2010 3,759,018 $13.15 
Balance at September 30, 2010 3,405,368 $13.15 
      

11


                                                
 Options Outstanding Options Exercisable  Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
 Weighted Weighted Weighted Weighted  Weighted Weighted Weighted Weighted
 Outstanding at Average Average Exercisable at Average Average  Outstanding at Average Average Exercisable at Average Average
 March 31, Remaining Exercise March 31, Remaining Exercise  September 30, Remaining Exercise September 30, Remaining Exercise
Range of Exercise Price 2010 Life (months) Price 2010 Life (months) Price 
$2.00 7,396 6 $2.00 7,396 6 $2.00 
$4.79 14,087 1 $4.79 14,087 1 $4.79 
Range of Exercise Prices 2010 Life (months) Price 2010 Life (months) Price
$5.00 82,750 38 $5.00 82,750 38 $5.00  68,500 32 $5.00 68,500 32 $5.00 
$6.41 – $8.16 1,457,266 87 $6.53 858,979 74 $6.61  1,409,932 81 $6.54 814,979 67 $6.62 
$11.66 – $12.53 750,386 44 $12.25 240,086 66 $11.66  582,836 32 $12.42 72,536 60 $11.66 
$15.90 303,667 94 $15.90 202,445 82 $15.90  296,267 88 $15.90 197,511 76 $15.90 
$17.60 – $19.87 599,754 82 $19.83 599,754 82 $19.83  554,089 76 $19.83 554,088 76 $19.83 
$22.55 – $24.07 445,878 73 $23.95 443,045 73 $23.95  397,244 67 $23.96 397,244 67 $23.96 
$26.26 – $27.11 45,000 86 $26.35 30,000 86 $26.35  45,000 80 $26.35 45,000 80 $26.35 
$29.88 40,000 98 $29.88 13,333 98 $29.88  40,000 92 $29.88 26,667 92 $29.88 
$34.19 12,834 99 $34.19 4,278 99 $34.19  11,500 93 $34.19 7,667 93 $34.19 
          
 3,759,018 75 $13.15 2,496,153 74 $14.43  3,405,368 70 $13.15 2,184,192 69 $14.87 
          
     The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the quarter and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2010 was $503.$842 and $2,914, respectively. The total intrinsic value of all in-the-money vested outstanding stock options at March 31,September 30, 2010 was $4,953.$12,329. Assuming all stock options outstanding at March 31,September 30, 2010 were vested, the total intrinsic value of all in-the-money outstanding stock options would have been $7,910.$20,558.
(b) Non-vested Restricted Stock:
     We present the amortization of non-vested restricted stock as an increase in additional paid-in capital. At March 31,September 30, 2010, amounts not yet recognized related to non-vested restricted stock totaled $17,265,$12,201, which represented the unamortized expense associated with awards of non-vested stock granted to employees, officers and directors under our compensation plans, including $10,012$2,379 related to grants during the quarternine months ended March 31,September 30, 2010. We recognized compensation expense associated with non-vested restricted stock totaling $1,884$2,428 and $2,122$1,998 for the quarters ended March 31,September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $6,740 and $6,312 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
     The following table summarizes the change in non-vested restricted stock from December 31, 2009 to March 31,September 30, 2010:
                
 Non-vested Non-vested
 Restricted Stock Restricted Stock
 Weighted Weighted
 Average Average
 Number Grant Price Number Grant Price
Balance at December 31, 2009 1,635,565 $10.27  1,635,565 $10.27 
Granted 797,796 $12.55  809,096 $12.62 
Vested  (667,926) $10.95   (678,290) $10.88 
Forfeited  (49,492) $10.59   (91,992) $10.89 
      
Balance at March 31, 2010 1,715,942 $11.06 
Balance at September 30, 2010 1,674,379 $11.12 
      

13


(c) Treasury Shares:
     In accordance with the provisions of the 2008 Incentive Award Plan, as amended, holders of non-vested restricted stock were given the option to either remit to us the required withholding taxes associated with the vesting of restricted stock, or to authorize us to repurchasepurchase shares equivalent to the cost of the withholding tax and to remit the withholding taxes on behalf of the holder. Pursuant to this provision, we repurchasedpurchased the following shares inof our common stock during the quarternine months ended March 31,September 30, 2010:
             
      Average Price  Extended 
Period Purchased  Paid per Share  Amount 
January 1 - 31, 2010  109,360  $12.53  $1,370 
March 1 - 31, 2010  902  $14.06   13 
           
   110,262      $1,383 
           
             
  Shares  Average Price  Extended 
Period Purchased  Paid per Share  Amount 
January 1 – 31, 2010  109,360  $12.53  $1,370 
March 1 – 31, 2010  902   14.06   13 
April 1 – 30, 2010  426   11.84   5 
May 1 – 31, 2010  1,260   14.48   18 
June 1– 30, 2010  355   14.83   4 
July 1 – 31, 2010  591   14.38   8 
           
   112,894      $1,418 
           
8.10. Earnings per share:
     We compute basic earnings per share by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of

12


common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per common and potential common share includes the weighted average of additional shares associated with the incremental effect of dilutive employee stock options and non-vested restricted stock, as determined using the treasury stock method prescribed by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) guidance on earnings per share. The following table reconciles basic and diluted weighted average shares used in the computation of earnings (loss) per share for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:
                 
  Quarter Ended Nine Months Ended
  September 30, September 30,
  2010 2009 2010 2009
  (In thousands)
Weighted average basic common shares outstanding  76,130   75,200   75,957   75,045 
Effect of dilutive securities:                
Employee stock options  751      628    
Non-vested restricted stock  914      812    
                 
Weighted average diluted common and potential common shares outstanding  77,795   75,200   77,397   75,045 
                 
     For the quartersquarter and nine months ended March 31, 2010 andSeptember 30, 2009, we incurred a net lossesloss and thus all potential common shares were deemed to be anti-dilutive. We excluded the impact of anti-dilutive potential common shares from the calculation of diluted weighted average shares for the quarters and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2010 and 2009. If these potential common shares were included in the calculation, the impact would have been a decrease in diluted weighted average shares outstanding of 386,68847,890 shares and 5,147,1441,253,920 shares for the quarters ended March 31,September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and 257,781 shares and 3,060,105 shares for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
9.11. Segment information:
     We report segment information based on how our management organizes the operating segments to make operational decisions and to assess financial performance. We evaluate performance and allocate resources based on net income (loss) from continuing operations before net interest expense, taxes, depreciation and amortization, non-controlling interest and impairment loss (“Adjusted EBITDA”). The calculation of Adjusted EBITDA should not be viewed as a substitute for calculations under U.S. GAAP, in

14


particular net income. Adjusted EBITDA is included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q because our management considers it an important supplemental measure of our performance and believes that it is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of companies in our industry, some of which present EBITDA when reporting their results. We regularly evaluate our performance as compared to other companies in our industry that have different financing and capital structures and/or tax rates by using Adjusted EBITDA. In addition, we use Adjusted EBITDA in evaluating acquisition targets. Management also believes that Adjusted EBITDA is a useful tool for measuring our ability to meet our future debt service, capital expenditures and working capital requirements, and Adjusted EBITDA is commonly used by us and our investors to measure our ability to service indebtedness. Adjusted EBITDA is not a substitute for the U.S. GAAP measures of earnings or cash flow and is not necessarily a measure of our ability to fund our cash needs. In addition, it should be noted that companies calculate EBITDA differently and, therefore, EBITDA has material limitations as a performance measure because it excludes interest expense, taxes, depreciation and amortization and non-controlling interest.amortization. Adjusted EBITDA calculated by us may not be comparable to the calculation of EBITDA as defined and used under our credit facilities (see Note 7, Long-term debt in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 for a description of the calculation of EBITDA under our existing credit facility, as amended). See also the table below for a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to operating income (loss) by segment.
     We have three reportable operating segments: completion and production services (“C&PS”), drilling services and product sales. The accounting policies of our reporting segments are the same as those used to prepare our consolidated financial statements as of March 31,September 30, 2010. Inter-segment transactions are accounted for on a cost recovery basis.
                                        
 Drilling Product      Drilling Product     
 C&PS Services Sales Corporate Total  C&PS Services Sales Corporate Total 
Quarter Ended March 31, 2010
 
Quarter Ended September 30, 2010
                
Revenue from external customers $266,288 $35,104 $8,312 $ $309,704  $361,457 $48,600 $8,552 $ $418,609 
Inter-segment revenues $27 $149 $607 $(783) $  $33 $(10) $3,177 $(3,200) $ 
Adjusted EBITDA, as defined $57,756 $5,419 $1,562 $(8,829) $55,908  $108,104 $12,936 $1,689 $(9,743) $112,986 
Depreciation and amortization $39,793 $4,458 $576 $492 $45,319  $39,078 $4,673 $539 $515 $44,805 
                      
Operating income (loss) $17,963 $961 $986 $(9,321) $10,589  $69,026 $8,263 $1,150 $(10,258) $68,181 
Capital expenditures $8,419 $2,838 $86 $ $11,343  $46,479 $1,036 $116 $330 $47,961 
  
As of March 31, 2010
 
Quarter Ended September 30, 2009
 
Revenue from external customers $198,014 $25,415 $6,484 $ $229,913 
Inter-segment revenues $1,211 $122 $1,295 $(2,628) $ 
Adjusted EBITDA, as defined $31,396 $(3,757) $1,791 $(7,025) $22,405 
Depreciation and amortization $43,744 $5,466 $603 $566 $50,379 
Impairment charge $ $36,158 $ $ $36,158 
           
Operating income (loss) $(12,348) $(45,381) $1,188 $(7,591) $(64,132)
Capital expenditures $3,844 $1,912 $18 $561 $6,335 
 
As of September 30, 2010
 
Segment assets $1,287,033 $172,556 $37,147 $113,389 $1,610,125  $1,380,903 $173,149 $29,470 $107,350 $1,690,872 
  
Quarter Ended March 31, 2009
 
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
 
Revenue from external customers $287,526 $35,391 $13,764 $ $336,681  $938,205 $124,149 $26,204 $ $1,088,558 
Inter-segment revenues $24 $285 $807 $(1,116) $  $225 $231 $4,567 $(5,023) $ 
Adjusted EBITDA, as defined $66,224 $6,887 $2,551 $(9,967) $65,695  $250,609 $27,018 $4,501 $(27,893) $254,235 
Depreciation and amortization $44,926 $5,548 $634 $581 $51,689  $118,641 $13,775 $1,676 $1,504 $135,596 
                      
Operating income (loss) $131,968 $13,243 $2,825 $(29,397) $118,639 
Capital expenditures $80,194 $8,400 $220 $1,041 $89,855 
 
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
 
Revenue from external customers $681,981 $85,515 $37,496 $ $804,992 
Inter-segment revenues $4,460 $734 $3,581 $(8,775) $ 
Adjusted EBITDA, as defined $129,044 $6,698 $6,427 $(25,569) $116,600 
Depreciation and amortization $133,393 $16,502 $1,861 $1,714 $153,470 
Impairment charge $ $36,158 $ $ $36,158 
           
Operating income (loss) $(4,349) $(45,962) $4,566 $(27,283) $(73,028)
Capital expenditures $25,267 $3,004 $175 $648 $29,094 
 
As of December 31, 2009
 
Segment assets $1,292,199 $172,605 $37,270 $86,780 $1,588,854 

1315


                     
      Drilling  Product       
  C&PS  Services  Sales  Corporate  Total 
Operating income (loss) $21,298  $1,339  $1,917  $(10,548) $14,006 
Capital expenditures $12,700  $  $40  $88  $12,828 
                     
As of December 31, 2009
                    
Segment assets $1,292,199  $172,605  $37,270  $86,780  $1,588,854 
     We do not allocate net interest expense or tax expense to theour operating segments. The following table reconciles operating income (loss) as reported above to net lossincome (loss) for the quarters and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2010 and 2009:
                        
 Quarters Ended  Quarters Ended Nine Months Ended 
 March 31,  September 30, September 30, 
 2010 2009  2010 2009 2010 2009 
Segment operating income $10,589 $14,006 
Segment operating income (loss) $68,181 $(64,132) $118,639 $(73,028)
Interest expense 14,741 14,458  14,152 13,987 43,653 42,344 
Interest income  (48)  (10)  (57)  (13)  (200)  (43)
Income taxes  (1,342)  (106) 21,056  (26,081) 29,247  (37,136)
              
Net loss $(2,762) $(336)
Net income (loss) $33,030 $(52,025) $45,939 $(78,193)
              
     There were no changesThe following table summarizes the change in the carrying amount of goodwill by segment for the quarternine months ended March 31, 2010. Consistent with the presentation at December 31, 2009, the balances at March 31, 2010 were as follows: C&PS—$235,859; Drilling Services—$5,563; and Product Sales—$2,401.September 30, 2010:
                 
      Drilling  Product    
  C&PS  Services  Sales  Total 
Balance at December 31, 2009
 $235,859  $5,563  $2,401  $243,823 
Acquisitions (a)  5,928         5,928 
             
Balance at September 30, 2010
 $241,787  $5,563  $2,401  $249,751 
             
(a)For a description of our business acquisitions as of September 30, 2010, see Note 2, Business Combinations.
10.12. Financial instruments:
     The financial instruments recognized in the balance sheet consist of cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable, bank operating loans, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, long-term debt and senior notes. The fair value of all financial instruments approximates their carrying amounts due to their current maturities or market rates of interest, except the senior notes which were issued in December 2006 with a fixed 8% coupon rate. At March 31,September 30, 2010, the fair value of these notes was $648,375$673,563 based on the published closing price.
     A significant portion of our trade accounts receivable is from companies in the oil and gas industry, and as such, we are exposed to normal industry credit risks. We evaluate the credit-worthiness of our major new and existing customers’ financial condition and generally do not require collateral. For the quarternine months ended March 31,September 30, 2010, one customer provided 11.1%11.4% of our sales and another customer provided 9.5%11.3% of our sales.
     We have entered into contracts with major customers, including the customer that provided 11.4% of our consolidated sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, to provide pressure pumping services. These contracts generally extend for up to three years from the date each fleet is placed into service and contain provisions which establish minimum price and utilization requirements and include provisions to account for certain inflationary market changes. We accrue revenue under these contracts as stages are completed, but typically bill our customers at the completion of the well or once per month. Unbilled receivables pursuant to these long-term contracts totaled $6,969 and $632 as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
11.13. Legal matters and contingencies:
     In the normal course of our business, we are a party to various pending or threatened claims, lawsuits and administrative proceedings seeking damages or other remedies concerning our commercial operations, products, employees and other matters, including warranty and product liability claims and occasional claims by individuals alleging exposure to hazardous materials, on the job injuries and fatalities as a result of our products or operations. Many of the claims filed against us relate to motor vehicle accidents which can result in the loss of life or serious bodily injury. Some of these claims relate to matters occurring prior

16


to our acquisition of businesses. In certain cases, we are entitled to indemnification from the sellers of such businesses.
     Although we cannot know or predict with certainty the outcome of any claim or proceeding or the effect such outcomes may have on us, we believe that any liability resulting from the resolution of any of these matters, to the extent not otherwise provided for or covered by insurance, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
     We have historically incurred additional insurance premium related to a cost-sharing provision of our general liability insurance policy, and we cannot be certain that we will not incur additional costs until either existing claims become further developed or until the limitation periods expire for each respective policy year. Any such additional premiums should not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

14


12.14. Guarantor and Non-Guarantor Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements:
     The following tables present the financial data required pursuant to SEC Regulation S-X Rule 3-10(f), which includes: (1) unaudited condensed consolidating balance sheets as of March 31,September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009; (2) unaudited condensed consolidating statements of operations for the quarters and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2010 and 2009 and (3) unaudited condensed consolidating statements of cash flows for the quartersnine months ended March 31,September 30, 2010 and 2009.
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
March 31,September 30, 2010
                                        
 Non-      Non-     
 Guarantor guarantor Eliminations/    Guarantor guarantor Eliminations/   
 Parent Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Reclassifications Consolidated  Parent Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Reclassifications Consolidated 
Current assets  
Cash and cash equivalents $93,731 $658 $16,403 $(5,353) $105,439  $132,830 $969 $21,384 $(11,918) $143,265 
Accounts receivable, net 594 173,109 32,782  206,485  389 250,515 30,576  281,480 
Inventory, net  21,981 12,140  34,121   20,082 12,019  32,101 
Prepaid expenses 1,946 11,609 1,516  15,071  7,561 11,992 1,286  20,839 
Income tax receivable 35,407 17,136 3,935  56,478   (10,448) 13,678 3,585  6,815 
Current deferred tax assets 8,158    8,158  908    908 
Other current assets  163   163   163   163 
                      
Total current assets 139,836 224,656 66,776  (5,353) 425,915  131,240 297,399 68,850  (11,918) 485,571 
Property, plant and equipment, net 3,891 845,962 58,839  908,692  4,253 853,523 55,531  913,307 
Investment in consolidated subsidiaries 770,383 112,507   (882,890)   847,251 114,301   (961,552)  
Inter-company receivable 577,694    (577,694)   559,052  642  (559,694)  
Goodwill 15,531 225,434 2,858  243,823  15,531 231,362 2,858  249,751 
Other long-term assets, net 15,250 12,193 4,252  31,695  30,726 9,627 1,890  42,243 
                      
Total assets $1,522,585 $1,420,752 $132,725 $(1,465,937) $1,610,125  $1,588,053 $1,506,212 $129,771 $(1,533,164) $1,690,872 
                      
Current liabilities  
Current maturities of long-term debt $ $193 $ $ $193  $ $89 $ $ $89 
Accounts payable  (738) 32,262 6,336  (5,353) 32,507  831 54,226 6,129  (11,918) 49,268 
Accrued liabilities 15,396 19,587 9,664  44,647  17,418 20,814 4,421  42,653 
Accrued payroll and payroll burdens 459 17,406 2,728  20,593  3,364 21,331 2,645  27,340 
Accrued interest 15,770  8  15,778  15,644 3 8  15,655 
Accrued taxes payable   221  221    589  589 
                      
Total current liabilities 30,887 69,448 18,957  (5,353) 113,939  37,257 96,463 13,792  (11,918) 135,594 
Long-term debt 650,000    650,000  650,000    650,000 
Inter-company payable  577,129 565  (577,694)    558,704 990  (559,694)  
Deferred income taxes 141,927 3,792 696  146,415  143,728 3,794 688  148,210 
                      
Total liabilities 822,814 650,369 20,218  (583,047) 910,354  830,985 658,961 15,470  (571,612) 933,804 
Stockholders’ equity  
Total stockholders’ equity 699,771 770,383 112,507  (882,890) 699,771  757,068 847,251 114,301  (961,552) 757,068 
                      
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $1,522,585 $1,420,752 $132,725 $(1,465,937) $1,610,125  $1,588,053 $1,506,212 $129,771 $(1,533,164) $1,690,872 
                      

17


Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
December 31, 2009
                     
          Non-       
      Guarantor  guarantor  Eliminations/    
  Parent  Subsidiaries  Subsidiaries  Reclassifications  Consolidated 
Current assets                    
Cash and cash equivalents $64,871  $519  $17,001  $(5,031) $77,360 
Accounts receivable, net  610   143,135   27,539      171,284 
Inventory, net     23,001   14,463      37,464 
Prepaid expenses  3,897   13,052   994      17,943 
Income tax receivable  35,404   20,201   2,001      57,606 
Current deferred tax assets  8,158            8,158 
Other current assets     111         111 
                
Total current assets  112,940   200,019   61,998   (5,031)  369,926 
Property, plant and equipment, net  4,222   876,304   60,607      941,133 
Investment in consolidated subsidiaries  755,435   104,974      (860,409)   
Inter-company receivable  607,325         (607,325)   

15


                                        
 Non-      Guarantor Non-
guarantor
 Eliminations/   
 Guarantor guarantor Eliminations/    Parent Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Reclassifications Consolidated 
Current assets 
Cash and cash equivalents $64,871 $519 $17,001 $(5,031) $77,360 
Accounts receivable, net 610 143,135 27,539  171,284 
Inventory, net  23,001 14,463  37,464 
Prepaid expenses 3,897 13,052 994  17,943 
Income tax receivable 35,404 20,201 2,001  57,606 
Current deferred tax assets 8,158    8,158 
Other current assets  111   111 
 Parent Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Reclassifications Consolidated            
Total current assets 112,940 200,019 61,998  (5,031) 369,926 
Property, plant and equipment, net 4,222 876,304 60,607  941,133 
Investment in consolidated subsidiaries 755,435 104,974   (860,409)  
Inter-company receivable 607,325    (607,325)  
Goodwill 15,531 225,434 2,858  243,823  15,531 225,434 2,858  243,823 
Other long-term assets, net 16,026 13,803 4,143  33,972  16,026 13,803 4,143  33,972 
                      
Total assets $1,511,479 $1,420,534 $129,606 $(1,472,765) $1,588,854  $1,511,479 $1,420,534 $129,606 $(1,472,765) $1,588,854 
                      
Current liabilities  
Current maturities of long-term debt $ $228 $ $ $228  $ $228 $ $ $228 
Accounts payable 445 30,028 6,303  (5,031) 31,745  445 30,028 6,303  (5,031) 31,745 
Accrued liabilities 14,064 18,257 8,781  41,102  14,064 18,257 8,781  41,102 
Accrued payroll and payroll burdens 388 10,847 2,324  13,559  388 10,847 2,324  13,559 
Accrued interest 3,198  8  3,206  3,198  8  3,206 
Notes payable 1,068 1   1,069  1,068 1   1,069 
Income taxes payable   813  813    813  813 
                      
Total current liabilities 19,163 59,361 18,229  (5,031) 91,722  19,163 59,361 18,229  (5,031) 91,722 
Long-term debt 650,000  2  650,002  650,000  2  650,002 
Inter-company payable  601,947 5,378  (607,325)    601,947 5,378  (607,325)  
Deferred income taxes 143,427 3,793 1,020  148,240  143,427 3,793 1,020  148,240 
                      
Total liabilities 812,590 665,101 24,629  (612,356) 889,964  812,590 665,101 24,629  (612,356) 889,964 
Stockholders’ equity  
Total stockholders’ equity 698,889 755,433 104,977  (860,409) 698,890  698,889 755,433 104,977  (860,409) 698,890 
                      
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $1,511,479 $1,420,534 $129,606 $(1,472,765) $1,588,854  $1,511,479 $1,420,534 $129,606 $(1,472,765) $1,588,854 
                      
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations
Quarter Ended March 31,September 30, 2010
                                        
 Non-      Non-     
 Guarantor guarantor Eliminations/    Guarantor guarantor Eliminations/   
 Parent Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Reclassifications Consolidated  Parent Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Reclassifications Consolidated 
Revenue:  
Service $ $268,094 $35,029 $(1,731) $301,392  $ $380,985 $30,804 $(1,732) $410,057 
Product  975 7,337  8,312   209 8,343  8,552 
                      
  269,069 42,366  (1,731) 309,704   381,194 39,147  (1,732) 418,609 
Service expenses  183,027 25,524  (1,731) 206,820   235,375 23,844  (1,732) 257,487 
Product expenses  710 5,414  6,124   122 6,224  6,346 
Selling, general and administrative expenses 8,830 29,437 2,585  40,852  9,743 29,492 2,555  41,790 
Depreciation and amortization 332 41,706 3,281  45,319  345 41,570 2,890  44,805 
                      
Income (loss) before interest and taxes  (9,162) 14,189 5,562  10,589   (10,088) 74,635 3,634  68,181 
Interest expense 14,712 1,708 14  (1,693) 14,741  14,478 1,188 18  (1,532) 14,152 
Interest income  (1,730)  (3)  (8) 1,693  (48)  (1,580)  (1)  (8) 1,532  (57)
Equity in earnings of consolidated affiliates  (13,354)  (5,929)  19,283    (49,101)  (2,864)  51,965  
                      
Income (loss) before taxes  (8,790) 18,413 5,556  (19,283)  (4,104) 26,115 76,312 3,624  (51,965) 54,086 
Taxes  (6,028) 5,059  (373)   (1,342)  (6,915) 27,211 760  21,056 
                      
Net income (loss) $(2,762) $13,354 $5,929 $(19,283) $(2,762) $33,030 $49,101 $2,864 $(51,965) $33,030 
                      

18


Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations
Quarter Ended March 31,September 30, 2009
                                        
 Non-      Non-     
 Guarantor guarantor Eliminations/    Guarantor guarantor Eliminations/   
 Parent Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Reclassifications Consolidated  Parent Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Reclassifications Consolidated 
Revenue:  
Service $ $291,407 $32,667  (1,157) $322,917  $ $197,004 $28,019 $(1,594) $223,429 
Product  3,983 9,781  13,764    (194) 6,678  6,484 
                      
  295,390 42,448  (1,157) 336,681   196,810 34,697  (1,594) 229,913 
Service expenses  189,611 22,759  (1,157) 211,213   139,093 20,209  (1,594) 157,708 
Product expenses  3,337 7,158  10,495   224 4,372  4,596 
Selling, general and administrative expenses 9,966 30,839 8,473  49,278  7,030 35,925 2,249  45,204 
Depreciation and amortization 391 47,712 3,586  51,689  414 46,884 3,081  50,379 
Impairment charge  36,158   36,158 
                      
Income (loss) before interest and taxes  (10,357) 23,891 472  14,006   (7,444)  (61,474) 4,786   (64,132)
Interest expense 14,547 1,905 57  (2,051) 14,458  13,894 1,809 52  (1,768) 13,987 
Interest income  (2,057)  (2)  (2) 2,051  (10)  (1,777)  (2)  (2) 1,768  (13)
Equity in earnings of consolidated affiliates  (14,787)  (832)  15,619   47,359  (3,740)   (43,619)  
                      
Income (loss) before taxes  (8,060) 22,820 417  (15,619)  (442)  (66,920)  (59,541) 4,736 43,619  (78,106)
Taxes  (7,724) 8,033  (415)   (106)  (14,895)  (12,182) 996   (26,081)
                      
Net income (loss) $(336) $14,787 $832 $(15,619) $(336) $(52,025) $(47,359) $3,740 $43,619 $(52,025)
                      

16


Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash FlowsOperations
QuarterNine Months Ended March 31,September 30, 2010
                     
          Non-       
      Guarantor  guarantor  Eliminations/    
  Parent  Subsidiaries  Subsidiaries  Reclassifications  Consolidated 
Cash provided by:                    
Net income (loss) $(2,762) $13,354  $5,929  $(19,283) $(2,762)
Items not affecting cash:                    
Equity in earnings of consolidated affiliates  (13,354)  (5,929)     19,283    
Depreciation and amortization  332   41,706   3,281      45,319 
Other  3,302   (1,285)  (18)     1,999 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities  13,373   (12,300)  (4,826)  (322)  (4,075)
                
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  891   35,546   4,366   (322)  40,481 
                     
Investing activities:                    
Additions to property, plant and equipment     (11,004)  (339)     (11,343)
Inter-company receipts  29,631         (29,631)   
Proceeds from the disposal of capital assets     450   68      518 
                
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  29,631   (10,554)  (271)  (29,631)  (10,825)
                     
Financing activities:                    
Repayments of long-term debt     (35)  (2)     (37)
Repayments of notes payable  (1,069)           (1,069)
Inter-company borrowings     (24,818)  (4,813)  29,631    
Proceeds from issuances of common stock  696            696 
Purchase of treasury shares  (1,383)           (1,383)
Other  94            94 
                
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  (1,662)  (24,853)  (4,815)  29,631   (1,699)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash        122      122 
                
Change in cash and cash equivalents  28,860   139   (598)  (322)  28,079 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period  64,871   519   17,001   (5,031)  77,360 
                
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $93,731  $658  $16,403  $(5,353) $105,439 
                
                     
          Non-       
      Guarantor  guarantor  Eliminations/    
  Parent  Subsidiaries  Subsidiaries  Reclassifications  Consolidated 
Revenue:                    
Service $  $973,389  $94,159  $(5,194) $1,062,354 
Product     2,135   24,069      26,204 
                
      975,524   118,228   (5,194)  1,088,558 
Service expenses     621,371   71,695   (5,194)  687,872 
Product expenses     1,654   18,139      19,793 
Selling, general and administrative expenses  27,893   88,393   10,372      126,658 
Depreciation and amortization  1,011   125,186   9,399      135,596 
                
Income (loss) before interest and taxes  (28,904)  138,920   8,623      118,639 
Interest expense  43,923   4,627   50   (4,947)  43,653 
Interest income  (5,142)  (5)     4,947   (200)
Equity in earnings of consolidated affiliates  (90,456)  (7,948)     98,404    
                
Income (loss) before taxes  22,771   142,246   8,573   (98,404)  75,186 
Taxes  (23,168)  51,790   625      29,247 
                
Net income (loss) $45,939  $90,456  $7,948  $(98,404) $45,939 
                
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
                     
          Non-       
      Guarantor  guarantor  Eliminations/    
  Parent  Subsidiaries  Subsidiaries  Reclassifications  Consolidated 
Revenue:                    
Service $  $686,237  $85,273  $(4,014) $767,496 
Product     13,639   23,857      37,496 
                
      699,876   109,130   (4,014)  804,992 
Service expenses     462,332   61,376   (4,014)  519,694 
Product expenses     12,979   15,604      28,583 
Selling, general and administrative expenses  25,569   98,888   15,658      140,115 
Depreciation and amortization  1,190   142,524   9,756      153,470 
Impairment charge     36,158         36,158 
                
Income (loss) before interest and taxes  (26,759)  (53,005)  6,736      (73,028)
Interest expense  42,373   5,243   146   (5,418)  42,344 
Interest income  (5,452)  (5)  (4)  5,418   (43)

19


                     
          Non-       
      Guarantor  guarantor  Eliminations/    
  Parent  Subsidiaries  Subsidiaries  Reclassifications  Consolidated 
Equity in earnings of consolidated affiliates  44,998   (5,778)     (39,220)   
                
Income (loss) before taxes  (108,678)  (52,465)  6,594   39,220   (115,329)
Taxes  (30,485)  (7,467)  816      (37,136)
                
Net income (loss) $(78,193) $(44,998) $5,778  $39,220  $(78,193)
                
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
QuarterNine Months Ended March 31,September 30, 2010
                     
          Non-       
      Guarantor  guarantor  Eliminations/    
  Parent  Subsidiaries  Subsidiaries  Reclassifications  Consolidated 
Cash provided by:                    
Net income (loss) $45,939  $90,456  $7,948  $(98,404) $45,939 
Items not affecting cash:                    
Equity in earnings of consolidated affiliates  (90,456)  (7,948)     98,404    
Depreciation and amortization  1,011   125,186   9,399      135,596 
Other  12,173   7,316   (451)     19,038 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities  50,829   (68,475)  (5,242)  (6,245)  (29,133)
                
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  19,496   146,535   11,654   (6,245)  171,440 
                     
Investing activities:                    
Additions to property, plant and equipment  (1,041)  (85,682)  (3,132)     (89,855)
Inter-company receipts  48,273         (48,273)   
Acquisitions     (21,332)        (21,332)
Proceeds from the disposal of capital assets     4,311   125      4,436 
                
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities  47,232   (102,703)  (3,007)  (48,273)  (106,751)
                     
Financing activities:                    
Repayments of long-term debt     (139)  (2)     (141)
Repayments of notes payable  (1,069)           (1,069)
Inter-company borrowings     (43,243)  (4,388)  47,631    
Proceeds from issuances of common stock  3,106            3,106 
Purchase of treasury shares  (1,418)           (1,418)
Other  612            612 
                
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  1,231   (43,382)  (4,390)  47,631   1,090 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash        126      126 
                
Change in cash and cash equivalents  67,959   450   4,383   (6,887)  65,905 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period  64,871   519   17,001   (5,031)  77,360 
                
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $132,830  $969  $21,384  $(11,918) $143,265 
                
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
                     
      Guarantor  Non-guarantor  Eliminations/    
  Parent  Subsidiaries  Subsidiaries  Reclassifications  Consolidated 
  (in thousands) 
Cash provided by:                    
Net income (loss) $(336) $14,787  $832  $(15,619) $(336)
Items not affecting cash:                    
Equity in earnings of consolidated affiliates  (14,787)  (832)     15,619    
Depreciation and amortization  391   47,712   3,586      51,689 
Other  3,914   5,151   6,385      15,450 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities  60,622   7,999   (9,029)  5,961   65,553 
                
                     
Net cash provided by operating activities  49,804   74,817   1,774   5,961   132,356 
Investing activities:                    
Additions to property, plant and equipment  (88)  (11,754)  (986)     (12,828)
Inter-company receipts  65,731      421   (66,152)   
Proceeds from the disposal of capital assets     7,066   90      7,156 
                
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  65,643   (4,688)  (475)  (66,152)  (5,672)
                     
Financing activities:                    
Issuances of long-term debt  1,641      1,505      3,146 
Repayments of long-term debt  (117,638)  (3,621)  (1,788)     (123,047)
Repayments of notes payable  (1,353)           (1,353)
Inter-company borrowings (repayments)     (66,152)     66,152    
                     
          Non-       
      Guarantor  guarantor  Eliminations/    
  Parent  Subsidiaries  Subsidiaries  Reclassifications  Consolidated 
Cash provided by:                    
Net income (loss) $(78,193) $(44,998) $5,778  $39,220  $(78,193)
Items not affecting cash:                    
Equity in earnings of consolidated affiliates  44,998   (5,778)     (39,220)   
Depreciation and amortization  1,190   142,524   9,756   ��  153,470 
Impairment charge     36,158         36,158 
Other  10,877   20,520   3,787      35,184 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions  65,708   54,019   (4,836)  8,553   123,444 
                
Net cash provided by operating activities  44,580   202,445   14,485   8,553   270,063 

1720


                                        
 Guarantor Non-guarantor Eliminations/    Non-     
 Parent Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Reclassifications Consolidated  Guarantor guarantor Eliminations/   
 (in thousands)  Parent Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Reclassifications Consolidated 
Investing activities: 
Additions to property, plant and equipment  (649)  (25,016)  (3,429)   (29,094)
Inter-company receipts 187,949  (502)   (187,447)  
Proceeds from the disposal of capital assets  19,860 295  20,155 
           
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities 187,300  (5,658)  (3,134)  (187,447)  (8,939)
 
Financing activities: 
Issuances of long-term debt 1,645  1,559  3,204 
Repayments of long-term debt  (187,638)  (3,759)  (9,057)   (200,454)
Repayments of notes payable  (6,241)     (6,241)
Inter-company borrowings   (192,501) 5,054 187,447  
Proceeds from issuances of common stock 25    25  197    197 
Other  (53)     (53)  (20)     (20)
                      
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  (117,378)  (69,773)  (283) 66,152  (121,282)  (192,057)  (196,260)  (2,444) 187,447  (203,314)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash   286  286     (167)   (167)
                      
Change in cash and cash equivalents  (1,931) 356 1,302 5,961 5,688  39,823 527 8,740 8,553 57,643 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 25,399 936 5,078  (12,323) 19,090  25,399 346 5,078  (12,323) 18,500 
                      
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $23,468 $1,292 $6,380 $(6,362) $24,778  $65,222 $873 $13,818 $(3,770) $76,143 
                      
13.15. Recent accounting pronouncements and authoritative literature:
     In May 2009, the FASB issued a standard regarding subsequent events that provides guidance as to when an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after a balance sheet date in its financial statements and the necessary disclosures related to these events. Specifically, the entity should recognize subsequent events that provide evidence about conditions that existed at the balance sheet date, including significant estimates used to prepare financial statements. Originally, this standard required entities to disclose the date through which subsequent events had been evaluated and whether that date was the date the financial statements were issued or the date the financial statements were available to be issued. We adopted this accounting standard effective June 30, 2009 and applied its provisions prospectively. In February 2010, the FASB modified this standard to eliminate the requirement for an SEC filing entitypublicly-traded entities to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. Therefore, we omitted the disclosure in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as of March 31,September 30, 2010.
     In January 2010, the FASB issued “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure (Topic 820)” which clarified the disclosure requirements of existing U.S. GAAP related to fair value measurements. This standard requires additional disclosures about recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements as follows: (1) for transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements, as those terms are currently defined in existing authoritative literature, a reporting entity is required to disclose the amount of the movement between levels and an explanation for the movement; (2) for activity at Level 3, primarily fair value measurements based on unobservable inputs, a reporting entity is required to present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, as opposed to presenting such transactions on a net basis; (3) in the event of a disaggregation, a reporting entity is required to provide fair value measurement disclosure for each class of assets and liabilities; and (4) a reporting entity is required to provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements for items that fall in either Level 2 or Level 3. These disclosure requirements are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements for which disclosure becomes effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. This standard did not impact our financial position, results of operations and cash flows as of and for the quarter ended March 31,September 30, 2010.
     On March 30, 2010, the President of the United States signed the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, which is a reconciliation bill that amends the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act that was signed by the President on March 23, 2010. Certain provisions of this law became effective during the quarter ended September 30, 2010. We have reviewed our health insurance plan provisions with third-party consultants and continue to evaluate our position relative to the changes in the law. We do not believe that the provisions which have taken effect during the quarter will have a

21


significant impact on the operation of our existing health insurance plan. However, future provisions under the law which become effective in subsequent periods may impact our health insurance plan and our overall financial position. We are currently awaitingevaluating these provisions as they become effective and continue to seek guidance from the FASB and SEC related to the implications of this new legislation on accounting and disclosure requirements. We expect that this legislation will have an impact on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows, but we cannot determine the extent of the impact at this time.
14. Subsequent Events:
     In AprilJuly 2010, the FASB issued “Receivables (Topic 310): Disclosure about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses.” This guidance will require companies to provide more information about the credit quality of their financing receivables in financial statements including, but not limited to, significant purchases and sales of financing receivables, aging information and credit quality indicators. We do not currently factor our receivables. We will adopt this accounting standard upon its effective date for periods ending on or after December 15, 2010, and we received federal income tax refunds totaling $43.7 million in connection withdo not anticipate that this adoption will have a significant impact on our 2009 federal income tax return, partially resulting from the realizationfinancial position, results of certain net operating loss carry backs for fiscal years 2006, 2007 and 2008.operations or cash flows.

1822


CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
     Certain statements and information in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections about us and the oil and gas industry. While management believes that these forward-looking statements are reasonable as and when made, there can be no assurance that future developments affecting us will be those that we anticipate. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that may be outside of our control and could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to: market prices for oil and gas, the level of oil and gas drilling, economic and competitive conditions, capital expenditures, regulatory changes and other uncertainties. Other factors that could cause our actual results to differ from our projected results are described in: (1) Part II, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report, (2) our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, (3) our reports and registration statements filed from time to time with the SEC and (4) other announcements we make from time to time. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed below may not occur. Unless otherwise required by law, we undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes available or other events occur in the future.
     The words “believe,” “may,” “estimate,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “expect” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of current or historical fact contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are forward-looking statements.
     Reference to “Complete,” the “Company,” “we,” “our” and similar phrases used throughout this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q relate collectively to Complete Production Services, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
     The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes as of March 31,September 30, 2010 and for the quarters and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2010 and 2009, included elsewhere herein.
Overview
     We are a leading provider of specialized services and products focused on helping oil and gas companies develop hydrocarbon reserves, reduce operating costs and enhance production. We focus on basins within North America that we believe have attractive long-term potential for growth, and we deliver targeted, value-added services and products required by our customers within each specific basin. We believe our range of services and products positions us to meet the many needs of our customers at the wellsite, from drilling and completion through production and eventual abandonment. We manage our operations from regional field service facilities located throughout the U.S. Rocky Mountain region, Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana, Arkansas, Pennsylvania, western Canada, Mexico and Southeast Asia.
     We operate in three business segments:
     Completion and Production Services. Through our completion and production services segment, we establish, maintain and enhance the flow of oil and gas throughout the life of a well. This segment is divided into the following primary service lines:
  Intervention Services.Well intervention requires the use of specialized equipment to perform an array of wellbore services. Our fleet of intervention service equipment includes coiled tubing units, pressure pumping units, nitrogen units, well service rigs, snubbing units and a variety of support equipment. Our intervention services provide customers with innovative solutions to increase production of oil and gas.

1923


  Downhole and Wellsite Services.Our downhole and wellsite services include electric-line, slickline, production optimization, production testing, rental and fishing services.
  Fluid Handling.We provide a variety of services to help our customers obtain, move, store and dispose of fluids that are involved in the development and production of their reservoirs. Through our fleet of specialized trucks, frac tanks and other assets, we provide fluid transportation, heating, pumping and disposal services for our customers.
     Drilling Services. Through our drilling services segment, we provide services and equipment that initiate or stimulate oil and gas production by providing landcontract drilling and specialized rig relocation and logistics services. Our drilling rigs operate primarily in and around the Barnett Shale region of north Texas.
     Product Sales. We provide oilfield service equipment and refurbishment of used equipment through our Southeast Asian business, and we provide repair work and fabrication services for our customers at a business located in Gainesville, Texas.
     Substantially all service and rental revenue we earn is based upon a charge for a period of time (an hour, a day, a week) for the actual period of time the service or rental is provided to our customer or on a fixed per-stage-completed fee. Product sales are recorded when the actual sale occurs and title or ownership passes to the customer.
General
     The primary factors influencing demand for our services and products are the level of drilling and workover activity of our customers and the complexity of such activity, which in turn, depends on current and anticipated future oil and gas prices, production depletion rates and the resultant levels of cash flows generated and allocated by our customers to their drilling and workover budgets. As a result, demand for our services and products is cyclical, substantially depends on activity levels in the North American oil and gas industry and is highly sensitive to current and expected oil and natural gas prices.
     We consider the drilling and well service rig counts to be an indication of spending by our customers in the oil and gas industry for exploration and development of new and existing hydrocarbon reserves. These spending levels are a primary driver of our business, and we believe that our customers tend to invest more in these activities when oil and gas prices are at higher levels, are increasing, or are expected to increase. The following tables summarize average North American drilling and well service rig activity, as measured by Baker Hughes Incorporated (“BHI”) and the Cameron International Corporation/Guiberson /AESC Service Rig Count for “Active Rigs.”Rigs”:
AVERAGE RIG COUNTS
                            
 Quarter Quarter Year Quarter Quarter Nine Months Nine Months
 Ended Ended Ended Ended Ended Ended Ended
 3/31/10 3/31/09 12/31/09 9/30/10 9/30/09 9/30/10 9/30/09
BHI Rotary Rig Count:
  
U.S. Land 1,300 1,287 1,046  1,601 936 1,459 1,036 
U.S. Offshore 46 57 44  18 34 35 47 
                
Total U.S. 1,346 1,344 1,090  1,619 970 1,494 1,083 
Canada 469 332 222  360 186 327 203 
                
Total North America 1,815 1,676 1,312  1,979 1,156 1,821 1,286 
                
 
Source:BHI(www.BakerHughes.com)
                 
  Quarter Quarter Nine Months Nine Months
  Ended Ended Ended Ended
  9/30/10 9/30/09 9/30/10 9/30/09
Cameron International Corporation/Guiberson/AESC Well Service Rig Count (Active Rigs):
                
United States  1,890   1,620   1,816   1,755 
Canada  553   428   479   452 
                 
Total North America  2,443   2,048   2,295   2,207 
                 

2024


             
  Quarter Quarter Year
  Ended Ended Ended
  3/31/10 3/31/09 12/31/09
Cameron International Corporation/Guiberson/AESC Well Service Rig Count (Active Rigs):
            
United States  1,729   1,975   1,722 
Canada  484   548   457 
             
Total North America  2,213   2,523   2,179 
             
 
Source: Cameron International Corporation/Guiberson/AESC Well Service Rig Count for “Active Rigs,” formerly the Weatherford/AESC Service Rig Count for “Active Rigs.”
Outlook
     Market conditions during 2009 were challenging as oilWe are positive about the outlook for our business in 2010. Despite relatively low natural gas commodity prices, we have experienced an increase in utilization of our assets and gas prices declined from historical highs in 2008 due to a number of macro-economic factors, resulting in reduced drilling and completion related activities by our customers. Throughout 2009, our operating results reflected this decline in activity as equipment was under-utilized and we experienced unfavorablemore favorable pricing for our services and products. In response to these market conditions we decreased our level of investment in capital expenditures relative to the prior years, and implemented cost-saving measures. In addition, we recorded impairment charges related to our drilling rigs totaling $36.2 million, as well as impairments of goodwill and other intangible assets which totaled $97.6 million and $2.5 million, respectively. Throughout 2009, our focus was on lowering the costsmany of our operations and support functions, while remaining responsiveservice lines during 2010 compared to our customers’ needs for quality services.
     During the first quarter of 2010, we have begun to see favorable trends for most of our business lines, particularly our pressure pumping business, and in most of our operating areas utilization levels began to improve.2009. Although we cannot be certain that these improvements will continue, we believe the improvingsustainability of current oil prices, due to economic indicators of an improved global economy relative to 2009, and the resulting increases in oil prices along with the need for our customers to hold recently acquired acreage, shouldwill create incentives to maintain, if not expand, activity in liquids-richoil and liquid-rich fields and emerging basins such as the Bakken Shale in North Dakota, the Eagle-FordEagle Ford Shale in south Texas and the Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania and the Haynesville Shale in Louisiana. However, activityPennsylvania. Activity levels in the more mature gas markets are less certain and may experience declines due to currentlower natural gas prices. In addition,prices, however we remain optimistic regarding the long-term outlook for natural gas. We continue to believe that any near-term growth in oil and gas activity in North America will be largely related to multi-stage, horizontal well completions. Since we have invested heavily in equipment that is configured for horizontal completions, and we believe we are well positionedthat customers will continue to be opportunistic in the basins in which we serve our customers.seek relationships with service providers who offer quality reliable service.
     Our long-term growth strategy has not changed. We seek to increase our internal capital investment by maximizingmaximize our equipment utilization adding like-kindand grow through organic investments in like equipment and expanding our service and product offerings. We plan to grow externally by acquiring complementary businesses to expand our service offerings in a current operating area or to extend our geographical footprint into targeted basins. In 2009, we reduced our overall capital investment to $38.5 million, and we did not complete any business acquisitions. For 2010, we expect to spend between $70.0$170.0 million and $80.0$180.0 million for capital investment, and we are evaluatinginvested $21.3 million to acquire two businesses. We continue to evaluate additional business acquisition opportunities. We may exceed $80.0 million in capital investments if additional attractive investment opportunities are identified.
Recent Transactions
     In March 2009, our Canadian subsidiary exchanged certain non-monetary assets with a net book value of $9.3 million related to our production testing business for certain e-line assets of a competitor. We recorded a non-cash loss on the transaction of $4.9 million, which represented the difference between the carrying value and the fair market value of the assets surrendered. We believe the e-line assets will generate incremental future cash flows compared to the production testing assets exchanged.

21

     On May 11, 2010, we acquired certain assets of a provider of gas lift services based in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma for $1.4 million in cash, subject to an additional $0.1 million holdback. We recorded goodwill totaling $1.0 million in conjunction with this acquisition which has been allocated entirely to the completion and production services business segment. We believe this acquisition supplements our plunger lift service offering for the completion and production services business segment.


     Effective June 30, 2010, we exchanged certain property, plant and equipment used in our fluid handling business for other equipment. This exchange was determined to have commercial substance for us and therefore we recorded the new assets at the fair market value of the assets received, which was more readily determinable than the fair market value of the assets surrendered. The fair market value of the assets received was $0.8 million, resulting in a gain on the non-monetary exchange of $0.5 million.
     On September 3, 2010, we completed the purchase of assets associated with a well service and fluid handling service provider based in Carrizo Springs, Texas. The total purchase price for the assets was $19.9 million, subject to an additional $1.0 million holdback, and included goodwill of $4.9 million, all of which was allocated to the completion and production services business segment. We believe this acquisition enhances our position in the Eagle Ford Shale in south Texas.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
     The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and

25


liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, and provide a basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily available through open market quotes. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically, and actual results may differ from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We must use our judgment related to uncertainties in order to make these estimates and assumptions.
     For a description of our critical accounting policies and estimates as well as certain sensitivity disclosures related to those estimates, see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. Our critical accounting policies and estimates have not changed materially during the quarternine months ended March 31,September 30, 2010.
Results of Operations
                                
 Percent  Percent 
 Quarter Quarter Change Change  Quarter Quarter Change Change 
 Ended Ended 2010/ 2010/  Ended Ended 2010/ 2010/ 
 3/31/10 3/31/09 2009 2009  9/30/10 9/30/09 2009 2009 
 (unaudited, in thousands)  (unaudited, in thousands) 
Revenue:
  
Completion and production services $266,288 $287,526 $(21,238)  (7%) $361,457 $198,014 $163,443  83%
Drilling services 35,104 35,391  (287)  (1%) 48,600 25,415 23,185  91%
Product sales 8,312 13,764  (5,452)  (40%) 8,552 6,484 2,068  32%
              
Total $309,704 $336,681 $(26,977)  (8%) $418,609 $229,913 $188,696  82%
              
  
Adjusted EBITDA:
  
Completion and production services $57,756 $66,224 $(8,468)  (13%) $108,104 $31,396 $76,708  244%
Drilling services 5,419 6,887  (1,468)  (21%) 12,936  (3,757) 16,693  444%
Product sales 1,562 2,551  (989)  (39%) 1,689 1,791  (102)  (6%)
Corporate  (8,829)  (9,967) 1,138  (11%)  (9,743)  (7,025)  (2,718)  (39%)
              
Total $55,908 $65,695 $(9,787)  (15%) $112,986 $22,405 $90,581  404%
              
                 
              Percent 
  Nine Months  Nine Months  Change  Change 
  Ended  Ended  2010/  2010/ 
  9/30/10  9/30/09  2009  2009 
  (unaudited, in thousands) 
Revenue:
                
Completion and production services $938,205  $681,981  $256,224   38%
Drilling services  124,149   85,515   38,634   45%
Product sales  26,204   37,496   (11,292)  (30%)
              
Total $1,088,558  $804,992  $283,566   35%
              
                 
Adjusted EBITDA:
                
Completion and production services $250,609  $129,044  $121,565   94%
Drilling services  27,018   6,698   20,320   303%
Product sales  4,501   6,427   (1,926)  (30%)
Corporate  (27,893)  (25,569)  (2,324)  (9%)
              
Total $254,235  $116,600  $137,635   118%
              
 
“Corporate” includes amounts related to corporate personnel costs, other general expenses and stock-based compensation charges.
“Adjusted EBITDA” consists of net income (loss) from continuing operations before net interest expense, taxes, depreciation and amortization, non-controlling interest and impairment loss. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure of performance. We use Adjusted EBITDA as the primary internal management measure for evaluating performance and allocating additional resources because our management considers it an important supplemental measure of our performance and believes that it is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of companies in our industry, some of which present EBITDA when reporting their results. We regularly evaluate our performance as compared to other companies in our industry that have different financing and capital structures and/or tax rates by using Adjusted EBITDA. In addition, we use Adjusted EBITDA in evaluating acquisition targets.
“Adjusted EBITDA” consists of net income (loss) from continuing operations before net interest expense, taxes, depreciation and amortization, non-controlling interest and impairment loss. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure of performance. We use Adjusted EBITDA as the primary internal management measure for evaluating performance and allocating additional resources because our management considers it an important supplemental measure of our performance and believes that it is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of companies in our industry, some of which present EBITDA when reporting their results. We regularly evaluate our performance as compared to other companies in our industry that have different financing and capital structures and/or tax rates by using Adjusted EBITDA. In addition, we use Adjusted EBITDA in evaluating acquisition targets. Management also believes that Adjusted EBITDA is a useful tool for measuring our ability to meet our future debt service, capital expenditures and working capital requirements, and Adjusted EBITDA is commonly used by us and our investors to measure our ability to service indebtedness. Adjusted EBITDA is not a substitute for the GAAP measures of earnings or cash flow and is not necessarily a measure of our ability to fund our cash needs. In addition, it should be noted that companies calculate EBITDA differently and, therefore, EBITDA has material limitations as a performance measure because it excludes interest expense, taxes, depreciation and amortization and non-controlling interest. The calculation of Adjusted EBITDA is different from the calculation of “EBITDA,” as defined and used in our credit facilities. For a discussion of the definition of “EBITDA” under our existing credit facilities, as recently amended, see Note 7, Long-term debt in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. The following table reconciles Adjusted EBITDA for the quarters ended

2226


March 31, 2010 and 2009 to the most comparable U.S. GAAP measure, operating income (loss).
Management also believes that Adjusted EBITDA is a useful tool for measuring our ability to meet our future debt service, capital expenditures and working capital requirements, and Adjusted EBITDA is commonly used by us and our investors to measure our ability to service indebtedness. Adjusted EBITDA is not a substitute for the GAAP measures of earnings or cash flow and is not necessarily a measure of our ability to fund our cash needs. In addition, it should be noted that companies calculate EBITDA differently and, therefore, EBITDA has material limitations as a performance measure because it excludes interest expense, taxes, depreciation and amortization. The calculation of Adjusted EBITDA is different from the calculation of “EBITDA,” as defined and used in our credit facilities. For a discussion of the definition of “EBITDA” under our existing credit facilities, as recently amended, see Note 7, Long-term debt in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. The following table reconciles Adjusted EBITDA for the quarters and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 to the most comparable U.S. GAAP measure, operating income (loss).
Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to Most Comparable U.S. GAAP Measure—Operating Income (Loss)
                                        
 Completion          Completion
and
         
 and          Production Drilling Product     
 Production Drilling Product      Services Services Sales Corporate Total 
 Services Services Sales Corporate Total  (unaudited, in thousands) 
 (unaudited, in thousands) 
Quarter Ended March 31, 2010
 
Quarter Ended September 30, 2010
 
Adjusted EBITDA, as defined $57,756 $5,419 $1,562 $(8,829) $55,908  $108,104 $12,936 $1,689 $(9,743) $112,986 
Depreciation and amortization $39,793 $4,458 $576 $492 $45,319  $39,078 $4,673 $539 $515 $44,805 
                      
Operating income (loss) $17,963 $961 $986 $(9,321) $10,589  $69,026 $8,263 $1,150 $(10,258) $68,181 
                      
  
Quarter Ended March 31, 2009
 
Quarter Ended September 30, 2009
 
Adjusted EBITDA, as defined $31,396 $(3,757) $1,791 $(7,025) $22,405 
Depreciation and amortization $43,744 $5,466 $603 $566 $50,379 
Impairment charge $ $36,158 $ $ $36,158 
           
Operating income (loss) $(12,348) $(45,381) $1,188 $(7,591) $(64,132)
           
 
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
 
Adjusted EBITDA, as defined $66,224 $6,887 $2,551 $(9,967) $65,695  $250,609 $27,018 $4,501 $(27,893) $254,235 
Depreciation and amortization $44,926 $5,548 $634 $581 $51,689  $118,641 $13,775 $1,676 $1,504 $135,596 
                      
Operating income (loss) $21,298 $1,339 $1,917 $(10,548) $14,006  $131,968 $13,243 $2,825 $(29,397) $118,639 
                      
 
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
 
Adjusted EBITDA, as defined $129,044 $6,698 $6,427 $(25,569) $116,600 
Depreciation and amortization $133,393 $16,502 $1,861 $1,714 $153,470 
Impairment charge $ $36,158 $ $ $36,158 
           
Operating income (loss) $(4,349) $(45,962) $4,566 $(27,283) $(73,028)
           
     We do not allocate net interest expense or tax expense to our operating segments. The following table reconciles operating income (loss) as reported above to net income (loss) for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:
                 
  Quarters Ended  Nine Months Ended 
  September 30,  September 30, 
  2010  2009  2010  2009 
Segment operating income (loss) $68,181  $(64,132) $118,639  $(73,028)
Interest expense  14,152   13,987   43,653   42,344 
Interest income  (57)  (13)  (200)  (43)
Income taxes  21,056   (26,081)  29,247   (37,136)
             
Net income (loss) $33,030  $(52,025) $45,939  $(78,193)
             
     Below is a discussion of our operating results by segment for these periods.

27


Quarter Ended March 31,September 30, 2010 Compared to the Quarter Ended March 31,September 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
     Revenue
     Revenue for the quarter ended March 31,September 30, 2010 decreasedincreased by $27.0$188.7 million, or 8%82%, to $309.7$418.6 million from $336.7$229.9 million for the same period in 2009. The changes by segment were as follows:
  Completion and Production Services.Segment revenue decreased $21.2increased $163.4 million, or 7%83%, for the third quarter of 2010 primarily due to lower pricing caused by an overall declinea substantial increase in investment by our customers in oil and gas exploration and development activities which beganresulting in late 2008higher utilization of our equipment. Activity levels and continued throughout 2009. Activity levelspricing in some service lines and select geographic areas began to improve during the latter part of the fourth quarter of 2009 but pricing remains belowand continued improving throughout the levels we experienced fornine months ended September 30, 2010. The segment continued to benefit from increased horizontal drilling and completion related activity within resource plays and also benefitted from the firstdeployment of approximately 40,000 hydraulic horse power of new pressure pumping equipment into the Eagle Ford and Bakken shales during the latter part of the third quarter of 2009.2010.
  Drilling Services.Segment revenue decreased $0.3increased $23.2 million, or 1%91%, for the quarter. On a year-over-year basis, this business segment has been impacted by lowerthird quarter of 2010 primarily due to improved utilization rates and pricing in our rig relocation and contract drilling operations and lower pricing in our rig logistics business.businesses. The drilling services segment has benefittedcontinues to benefit from a number of long rig moves in the first quarter of 2010, as customers reposition assets tointo emerging markets such as the Bakken Shale and Eagle-Ford Shale.Eagle Ford Shales.
  Product Sales.Segment revenue decreased $5.5increased $2.1 million, or 40%32%, for the third quarter primarilyof 2010 due to an increase in product sales from our Asian operations and an improvement in third-party sales at our fabrication and repair business in Texas. DuringTexas over the firstthird quarter of 2009, we completed several projects including a well service rig for a customer and sold several large inventory items. This business had less activity during the first quarter of 2010, as a result of the overall decline in spending by our customers on new equipment.2009.
     Service and Product Expenses
     Service and product expenses include labor costs associated with the execution and support of our services, materials used in the performance of those services and other costs directly related to the support and maintenance of equipment. These expenses decreased $8.8increased $101.5 million, or 4%63%, to $212.9$263.8 million for the quarter ended March 31,September 30, 2010 from $221.7$162.3 million for the quarter ended March 31,September 30, 2009. The following table summarizes service and product expenses as a percentage of revenues for the quarters ended March 31,September 30, 2010 and 2009:

23


Service and Product Expenses as a Percentage of Revenue
            
             Quarter Ended
 Quarter Ended 9/30/10 9/30/09 Change
Segment: 3/31/10 3/31/09 Change 
Completion and production services  68%  65%  3%  62%  69%  (7%)
Drilling services  75%  70%  5%  69%  83%  (14%)
Product sales  74%  76%  (2%)  74%  71%  3%
Total  69%  66%  3%  63%  71%  (8%)
     Service and product expenses as a percentage of revenue increaseddecreased for the quarter ended March 31,September 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. Margins by2009 primarily due to increased asset utilization and pricing improvements. Service and product expenses as a percentage of revenue for the completion and production and drilling services business segment weresegments decreased when comparing the quarter ended September 30, 2010 to the same period in 2009 due to an increase in overall oilfield activity, pricing and service mix, particularly a shift to historically higher-margin service lines. Service and product expenses as a percentage of revenue for the products segments increased 3% for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 compared to the quarter ended September 2009 primarily impacted by lower revenue as describeddue to changes in more detail below.product mix. Our products business is generally project-specific and margins can fluctuate between periods depending upon the type of products sold and repair work being performed.

28


Completion and Production Services.Service and product expenses as a percentage of revenue for this business segment increased when comparing the quarter ended March 31, 2010 to the same period in 2009 due to lower revenue in the first quarter of 2010 and cost-saving measures implemented in late 2008 and early 2009.
Drilling Services.Service and product expenses as a percentage of revenue for this business segment increased for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 due to lower revenue and the benefit received from the aforementioned cost-saving measures.
Product Sales.Service and product expenses as a percentage of revenue for the products segments decreased for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. Impacting the results for the first quarter of 2009 was the sale of several large inventory items at lower margins. Therefore, although year-over-year sales were down for the products business, the mix of product sales for the first quarter of 2010 was more favorable than that of the comparable quarter in 2009.
     Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
     Selling, general and administrative expenses include salaries and other related expenses for our selling, administrative, finance, information technology and human resource functions. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $8.4$3.4 million, or 17%8%, for the quarter ended March 31,September 30, 2010 to $40.9$41.8 million from $49.3$45.2 million during the quarter ended March 31,September 30, 2009. Included in theThe results for 2009 include charges for bad debt associated with specifically-identified uncollectible accounts, losses on the quarter ended March 31,retirement of fixed assets and inventory adjustments. Excluding these items, selling, general and administrative expenses increased in 2010 compared to 2009 was a $4.9 million loss on a non-monetary exchange of assetsdue to an increase in Canada. In addition, the year-over-year results were impacted by the timing of cost-saving measures implemented by management during the first quarter of 2009payroll costs associated with increased headcount and an increase in response to unfavorable market conditions.incentive compensation based upon earnings. As a percentage of revenues, selling, general and administrative expense was 13%10% and 15%20% for the quarters ended March 31,September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
     Depreciation and Amortization
     Depreciation and amortization expense decreased $6.4$5.6 million, or 12%11%, to $45.3$44.8 million for the quarter ended March 31,September 30, 2010 from $51.7$50.4 million for the quarter ended March 31,September 30, 2009. The decrease in depreciation and amortization expense was primarily dueattributable to the normal run-off of depreciation associated with existing assets while relatively few assets have been placed in service during the current year. In addition, there were significant asset retirements in 2009 including impairments takenan impairment of our drilling rigs totaling $36.2 million as of September 30, 2009 and an impairment charge in late 2009 related to our drilling rig businesscertain intangible assets acquired in Texas during the third quarter of 2009.2008. As a percentage of revenue, depreciation and amortization was 15%11% and 22% for the quarters ended March 31,September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Impairment loss
     We recorded an impairment charge related to our contract drilling business of $36.2 million in the third quarter of 2009 after determining that the carrying value of certain of these drilling rigs exceeded the undiscounted cash flows associated with these assets and the fair market value estimates for these assets.
Taxes
     We recorded a provision of $21.1 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 at an effective rate of approximately 39% and a tax benefit of $26.1 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 at an effective rate of approximately 33%. The increase in the effective tax rate was primarily due to an increase in pre-tax earnings in various tax jurisdictions resulting in higher state income taxes, a decrease in benefit from the foreign tax rate differential and the impact of non-deductible items.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
Revenue
     Revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 increased by $283.6 million, or 35%, to $1,088.6 million from $805.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The changes by segment were as follows:
Completion and Production Services.Segment revenue increased $256.2 million, or 38%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 primarily due to an increase in demand for our services and an overall increase in activity levels for the oil and gas industry during 2010 compared to 2009, resulting in higher utilization of our equipment. Activity levels and pricing in some service lines and select geographic areas began to improve during the latter part of the fourth quarter of 2009 and continued improving throughout the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The segment continued to benefit from increased horizontal drilling and completion related activity within resource plays and also benefitted from the deployment of approximately 40,000 hydraulic horse power of new pressure pumping equipment into the Eagle Ford and Bakken shales during the latter part of the third quarter of 2010.

29


Drilling Services.Segment revenue increased $38.6 million, or 45%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 primarily due to improved utilization and pricing in our rig relocation and contract drilling businesses. The drilling services segment benefitted from long rig moves as customers repositioned assets into emerging markets such as the Bakken and Eagle Ford shales.
Product Sales.Segment revenue decreased $11.3 million, or 30%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 due primarily to lower third-party sales at our repair and fabrication shop in north Texas as several large projects were completed during the first quarter of 2009, partially offset by a slight improvement in our Southeast Asian business during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009.
Service and Product Expenses
     Service and product expenses increased $159.4 million, or 29%, to $707.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from $548.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The following table summarizes service and product expenses as a percentage of revenues for the nine months ended September, 2010 and 2009:
Service and Product Expenses as a Percentage of Revenue
             
  Nine Months Ended
  9/30/10 9/30/09 Change
Segment:
 
Completion and production services  64%  67%  (3%)
Drilling services  71%  74%  (3%)
Product sales  76%  76%  (0%)
Total  65%  68%  (3%)
     Service and product expenses as a percentage of revenue decreased 3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. Margins by business segment were primarily impacted by utilization and pricing.
Completion and Production Services.Service and product expenses as a percentage of revenue for this business segment decreased when comparing the nine months ended September 30, 2010 to the same period in 2009. The year-over-year favorable margin improvement was attributable to an increase in overall oilfield activity, improved pricing and service mix, with an increase in sales for historically higher-margin offerings, partially offset by some inflationary factors including higher labor costs.
Drilling Services.Service and product expenses as a percentage of revenue for this business segment decreased 3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 primarily due to increased asset utilization and improved pricing.
Product Sales.Service and product expenses as a percentage of revenue for the products segments remained consistent for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
     Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $13.4 million, or 10% to $126.7 million, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $140.1 million for the same period in 2009. The results for 2009 include charges for bad debt associated with specifically-identified uncollectible accounts, losses on the retirement of fixed assets and inventory adjustments. In addition, we recorded a loss on the non-monetary exchange of certain assets in Canada during the first quarter of 2009 which totaled $4.9 million. The overall decrease in selling, general and administrative expense in 2010 was partially offset by higher earnings-based incentive compensation, as well as higher insurance costs and the write-off of a $1.9 million note receivable in Canada. Excluding the impact of the non-monetary asset exchange in 2009, as a

30


percentage of revenues, selling, general and administrative expense was 12% and 17% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Depreciation and Amortization
     Depreciation and amortization expense decreased $17.9 million, or 12%, to $135.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from $153.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The decrease in depreciation and amortization expense was attributable to the normal run-off of depreciation associated with existing assets while relatively few assets have been placed in service during the current year. In addition, there were significant asset retirements in 2009 including an impairment of our drilling rigs totaling $36.2 million as of September 30, 2009, sale-leaseback transactions associated with our small vehicle fleet and a facility in Wyoming and an impairment charge in late 2009 related to certain intangible assets acquired in 2008. As a percentage of revenue, depreciation and amortization expense decreased to 12% from 19% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Impairment loss
     We recorded an impairment charge related to our contract drilling business of $36.2 million in the third quarter of 2009 after determining that the carrying value of certain of these drilling rigs exceeded the undiscounted cash flows associated with these assets and the fair market value estimates for these assets.
Interest Expense
     Interest expense increased $1.4 million, or 3%, to $43.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from $42.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The increase in interest expense was primarily attributable to higher costs associated with our credit facility, which was amended during the fourth quarter of 2009. The weighted-average interest rate of borrowings outstanding at September 30, 2010 and 2009 was 8.0%.
     Taxes
     We recorded a tax benefitprovision of $1.3$29.2 million for the quarternine months ended March 31,September 30, 2010 at an effective rate of approximately 33%39% and a tax benefit of $0.1$37.1 million for the quarternine months ended March 31,September 30, 2009 at an effective rate of approximately 24%32%. The lower effective rate for the quarternine months ended March 31,September 30, 2009 was impacted by a $4.9 milliondue to our foreign tax rate differential, the impact of state and provincial tax expense relative to our operating loss on a non-monetary asset exchangeand certain non-deductible items for the years in Canada.which losses occurred.

24


Liquidity and Capital Resources
     The disruptionAs of September 30, 2010, we had working capital, net of cash, of $206.7 million and cash and cash equivalents of $143.3 million, compared to working capital, net of cash, of $200.8 million and cash and cash equivalents of $77.4 million at December 31, 2009. This increase in working capital was primarily due to an increase in accounts receivable, associated with favorable operational results, partially offset by an increase in accrued expenses including interest expense associated with the credit markets which occurredsemi-annual payments on our senior notes. Cash increased primarily due to favorable operating results for the first nine months of 2010.
     Our total outstanding debt was $650.1 million at September 30, 2010, and we have no significant debt maturities until 2016. We had no borrowings and $26.4 million in 2008 and 2009 resulted in a significant adverse impact on the availabilitycommitted letters of credit from a number of financial institutions.outstanding under our revolving credit facility. We are not currently a party to any interest rate swaps, currency hedges or derivative contracts of any type and have no exposure to commercial paper or auction rate securities markets. We will continue to closely monitor our liquidity and the overall health of the credit markets. However, we cannot predict with any certainty the impact that any further disruption in the credit environment would have on us.
     Our primary liquidity needs are to fund capital expenditures and general working capital. In addition, we have historically obtained capital to fund strategic business acquisitions. Our primary sources of funds have been cash flow from operations, proceeds from borrowings under bank credit facilities, a private placement of debt that was subsequently exchanged for publicly registered debt and the issuance of equity securities in our initial public offering.
     As of March 31, 2010, we had working capital, net of cash, of $206.5 million and cash and cash equivalents of $105.4 million, compared to working capital, net of cash, of $200.8 million and cash and cash equivalents of $77.4 million at December 31, 2009. Our working capital, net of cash, remained relatively consistent at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. Cash increased primarily due to collection of trade receivables.
     We anticipate that we will rely onour cash generated from operations and our current cash balance will be sufficient to fund the majority of our cash requirements for the next twelve months, however borrowings under our amended revolving credit facility, future debt offerings and/or future public equity offerings may also be used to fund future acquisitions or satisfy our other liquidity

31


needs. We believe that funds from these sources or funds received from our newly amended credit facility, will be sufficient to meet both our short-term working capital requirements and our long-term capital requirements. If our plans or assumptions change, are inaccurate, or if we make further acquisitions, we may have to raise additional capital. Our ability to fund planned capital expenditures and to make acquisitions will depend upon our future operating performance, and more broadly, on the availability of equity and debt financing, which will be affected by prevailing economic conditions in our industry, and general financial, business and other factors, some of which are beyond our control. In addition,new debt obtained could include service requirements based on higher interest paid and shorter maturities and could impose a significant burden on our results of operations and financial condition. The issuance of additional equity securities could result in significant dilution to stockholders.
     On October 13, 2009, we completed an amendment to our existing revolving credit facilities (the “Third Amendment”) which modified the structure of the credit facility to an asset-based facility subject to borrowing base restrictions. This amendment provided us with less restrictive financial debt covenants and reduced borrowing capacity under the facility. We believe the amended revolving credit facility will allow us to better manage our cash flow needs, provide greater certainty of access to funds in the future and allow us to use our asset base for future financing needs.
     The following table summarizes cash flows by type for the periods indicated (in thousands):
                
 Quarters Ended Nine Months Ended
 March 31, September 30,
 2010 2009 2010 2009
Cash flows provided by (used in):  
Operating activities $40,481 $132,356  $171,440 $270,063 
Investing activities  (10,825)  (5,672)  (106,751)  (8,939)
Financing activities  (1,699)  (121,282) 1,090  (203,314)
     Net cash provided by operating activities decreased $91.9by $98.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. Operating cash flows for 2009 were positively impacted by an increase in cash receipts, as overall oilfield activity levels declined and receivables were collected. During the first nine months of 2010, and in the quarter ended March 31,September 30, 2010 in particular, cash receipts activity has remained favorable, but an increase in sales has resulted in an increase in outstanding receivables at September 30, 2010. Partially offsetting this decrease in operating cash flows associated with trade receivables was the receipt of a $43.7 million tax refund in April 2010.
     Net cash used in investing activities increased by $97.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. This decrease in operating cash flows in the first quarter of 2010 was primarily due to higher cash receipts in 2009 as trade receivables were collected. As market conditions deteriorated, sales declined and fewer new receivables were recorded, thereby generating higher operating cash flows in 2009 relative to 2010. Also impacting operating cash flowsincrease was the timingresult of payroll related accruals at March 31, 2010 relative to March 31, 2009.our investment in capital equipment and business acquisitions which totaled $89.9 million and $21.3 million, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, our investment in capital equipment was approx. $29.1 million, partially offset by proceeds from the retirement of fixed assets, with no business acquisitions.
     Net cash used in investingprovided by financing activities increased by $5.2was $1.1 million for the quarternine months ended March 31, 2010

25


compared to the same period in 2009. This was primarily driven by lower cash proceeds from the disposal of assets during the first quarter ofSeptember 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009, partially offset by a $1.5 million decrease in capital spending in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009.
     Netnet cash used infor financing activities was $1.7 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 compared to $121.3of $203.3 million for the same period in 2009. In the first quarternine months of 2009, we repaid $119.9$197.2 million of net borrowings under our debt facilities. No borrowings or repayments were made under these debt facilities for the first quarternine months of 2010. Our long-term debt, including current maturities, was $650.1 million as of September 30, 2010 and $650.2 million as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
     We believe that our cash balance, operating cash flows and borrowing capacity will be sufficient to fund our operations for the next twelve months.
Dividends
     We did not pay dividends on our $0.01 par value common stock during the quarternine months ended March 31,September 30, 2010 or during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007. We do not intend to pay dividends in the foreseeable future, but rather plan to build our cash balance near-term and reinvest such funds in our business. Furthermore, our credit facility contains restrictive debt covenants which preclude us from paying future dividends on our common stock.

32


Description of Our Indebtedness
Senior Notes.
     On December 6, 2006, we issued 8.0% senior notes with a face value of $650.0 million through a private placement of debt. These notes mature in 10 years, on December 15, 2016, and require semi-annual interest payments, paid in arrears and calculated based on an annual rate of 8.0%, on June 15 and December 15, of each year, which commenced on June 15, 2007. There was no discount or premium associated with the issuance of these notes. The senior notes are guaranteed by all of our current domestic subsidiaries. The senior notes have covenants which, among other things: (1) limit the amount of additional indebtedness we can incur; (2) limit restricted payments such as a dividend; (3) limit our ability to incur liens or encumbrances; (4) limit our ability to purchase, transfer or dispose of significant assets; (5) limit our ability to purchase or redeem stock or subordinated debt; (6) limit our ability to enter into transactions with affiliates; (7) limit our ability to merge with or into other companies or transfer all or substantially all of our assets; and (8) limit our ability to enter into sale and leaseback transactions. We have the option to redeem all or part of these notes on or after December 15, 2011. Additionally, we may redeem some or all of the notes prior to December 15, 2011 at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes plus a make-whole premium.
     Pursuant to a registration rights agreement with the holders of our 8.0% senior notes, on June 1, 2007, we filed a registration statement on Form S-4 with the SEC which enabled these holders to exchange their notes for publicly registered notes with substantially identical terms. These holders exchanged 100% of the notes for publicly traded notes on July 25, 2007. On August 28, 2007, we entered into a supplement to the indenture governing the 8.0% senior notes, whereby additional domestic subsidiaries became guarantors under the indenture. Effective April 1, 2009, we entered into a second supplement to this indenture whereby additional domestic subsidiaries became guarantors under the indenture.
Credit Facility.
     We maintain a senior secured facility (the “Credit Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as U.S. Administrative Agent, HSBC Bank Canada, as Canadian Administrative Agent, and certain other financial institutions. On October 13, 2009, we entered into the Third Amendment (the Credit Agreement after giving effect to the Third Amendment, the “Amended Credit Agreement”) and modified the structure of our existing credit facility to an asset-based facility subject to borrowing base restrictions. In connection with the Third Amendment, Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC (formerly known as Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC) replaced Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as U.S. Administrative Agent and also serves as U.S. Issuing Lender and U.S. Swingline Lender under the Amended Credit Agreement. The Amended Credit Agreement provides for a U.S. revolving credit facility of up to $225 million that matures

26


in December 2011 and a Canadian revolving credit facility of up to $15 million (with Integrated Production Services Ltd., one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, as the borrower thereof (“Canadian Borrower”)) that matures in December 2011. The Amended Credit Agreement includes a provision for a “commitment increase”, as defined therein, which permits us to effect up to two separate increases in the aggregate commitments under the Amended Credit Agreement by designating one or more existing lenders or other banks or financial institutions, subject to the bank’s sole discretion as to participation, to provide additional aggregate financing up to $75 million, with each committed increase equal to at least $25 million in the U.S., or $5 million in Canada, and in accordance with other provisions as stipulated in the Amended Credit Agreement. Certain portions of the credit facilities are available to be borrowed in U.S. dollars, Canadian dollars and other currencies approved by the lenders.
     We were in compliance withnot subject to the fixed charge coverage ratio covenant in the Amended Credit Agreement as of March 31,September 30, 2010 since the Excess Availability Amount plus Qualified Cash Amount (each as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement) exceeded $50 million. If we were subject to the fixed charge coverage ratio covenant, we would have been in compliance as of September 30, 2010. For a discussion of the methodology to calculate the borrowing base for the U.S. and Canadian portions of the facility, as well as our debt covenant requirements, prepayment options and potential exposure in the event of a default under the Amended Credit Agreement, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K as of December 31, 2009.

33


     All of the obligations under the U.S. portion of the Amended Credit Agreement are secured by first priority liens on substantially all of our assets and the assets of our U.S. subsidiaries as well as a pledge of approximately 66% of the stock of our first-tier foreign subsidiaries. Additionally, all of the obligations under the U.S. portion of the Amended Credit Agreement are guaranteed by substantially all of our U.S. subsidiaries. The obligations under the Canadian portion of the Amended Credit Agreement are secured by first priority liens on substantially all of our assets and the assets of our subsidiaries (other than our Mexican subsidiary). Additionally, all of the obligations under the Canadian portion of the Amended Credit Agreement are guaranteed by us as well as certain of our subsidiaries.
     Subject to certain limitations set forth in the Amended Credit Agreement, we have the ability to elect how interest under the Amended Credit Agreement will be computed. Interest under the Amended Credit Agreement may be determined by reference to (1) the London Inter-bank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, plus an applicable margin between 3.75% and 4.25% per annum (with the applicable margin depending upon our “excess availability amount”, as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement) or (2) the “Base Rate” (which means the higher of the Prime Rate, Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%, 3-month LIBOR plus 1.00% and 3.50%), plus the applicable margin, as described above. For the period from the effective date of the Third Amendment until the six month anniversary of the effective date of the Third Amendment, interest will bewas computed as described above with an applicable margin rate of 4.00%. If an event of default exists or continues under the Amended Credit Agreement, advances will bear interest as described above with an applicable margin rate of 4.25% plus 2.00%. Additionally, if an event of default exists under the Amended Credit Agreement, as defined therein, the lenders could accelerate the maturity of the obligations outstanding thereunder and exercise other rights and remedies. Interest is payable monthly.
     There were no borrowings outstanding under our U.S. or Canadian revolving credit facilities as of or during the quarternine months ended March 31,September 30, 2010. There were letters of credit outstanding under the U.S. revolving portion of the facility totaling $54.6$26.4 million, which reduced the available borrowing capacity as of March 31,September 30, 2010. We incurred fees related to our letters of credit foras of September 30, 2010 at 4.0% per annum. For the quarternine months ended March 31,September 30, 2010, which wasfees related to our letters of credit were calculated using a 360-day provision, at 4.1% per annum. The net excess availability under our borrowing base calculations for the U.S. and Canadian revolving facilities at March 31,September 30, 2010 was $104.4$183.9 million and $9.9$7.0 million respectively.
     The primary purpose of our letters of credit is to secure potential future claim liability which may be incurred by our insurance providers. During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, we negotiated a reduction in our letter of credit requirements of $5.6 million. In addition, we placed $17.0 million in escrow as a compensating balance, effectively cash collateralizing a portion of our letters of credit, in order to better utilize excess cash and reduce interest expense. This compensating balance has been recorded as a long-term asset called “Restricted Cash” on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2010.
We will incur unused commitment fees under the Amended Credit Agreement ranging from 0.50% to 1.00% based on the average daily balance of amounts outstanding. The unused commitment fees were calculated at 1.00% as of March 31,September 30, 2010.
Outstanding Debt and Commitments
     Our contractual commitmentslong-term debt and lease obligations have not changed materially since December 31, 2009.
     We2009, however we have entered into agreements to purchase certain equipment for use in our business.business during the first nine months of 2010 which exceed $31.0 million. The manufacture of this equipment requires lead-time and we generally are committed to accept this equipment at the time of delivery, unless arrangements have been made to cancel delivery in accordance with the

27


purchase agreement terms. We believe that our cash on hand, available borrowing capacity under our credit facilities and our operating cash flows should be sufficient to fund our firm purchase commitments.
     We entered into an agreement in October 2010 to purchase two saltwater disposal wells for approximately $11.0 million in cash in the Rocky Mountain Region. However, this acquisition has not funded as of October 28, 2010, and remains subject to finalization.
     We expect to continue to acquire complementary companies and evaluate potential acquisition targets. We may use cash from operations, proceeds from future debt or equity offerings and borrowings under our

34


amended revolving credit facility for this purpose.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements and Authoritative Guidance
     In May 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)“FASB” issued a standard regarding subsequent events that provides guidance as to when an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after a balance sheet date in its financial statements and the necessary disclosures related to these events. Specifically, the entity should recognize subsequent events that provide evidence about conditions that existed at the balance sheet date, including significant estimates used to prepare financial statements. Originally, this standard required entities to disclose the date through which subsequent events had been evaluated and whether that date was the date the financial statements were issued or the date the financial statements were available to be issued. We adopted this accounting standard effective June 30, 2009 and applied its provisions prospectively. In February 2010, the FASB modified this standard to eliminate the requirement for an SEC entitypublicly-traded entities to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. Therefore, we omitted the disclosure in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as of March 31,September 30, 2010.
     In January 2010, the FASB issued “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure (Topic 820)” which clarified the disclosure requirements of existing U.S. GAAP related to fair value measurements. This standard requires additional disclosures about recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements as follows: (1) for transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements, as those terms are currently defined in existing authoritative literature, a reporting entity is required to disclose the amount of the movement between levels and an explanation for the movement; (2) for activity at Level 3, primarily fair value measurements based on unobservable inputs, a reporting entity is required to present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, as opposed to presenting such transactions on a net basis; (3) in the event of a disaggregation, a reporting entity is required to provide fair value measurement disclosure for each class of assets and liabilities; and (4) a reporting entity is required to provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements for items that fall in either Level 2 or Level 3. These disclosure requirements are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements for which disclosure becomes effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. This standard did not impact our financial position, results of operations and cash flows as of and for the quarter ended March 31,September 30, 2010.
     On March 30, 2010, the President of the United States signed the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, which is a reconciliation bill that amends the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act that was signed by the President on March 23, 2010. Certain provisions of this law became effective during the quarter ended September 30, 2010. We have reviewed our health insurance plan provisions with third-party consultants and continue to evaluate our position relative to the changes in the law. We do not believe that the provisions which have taken effect during the quarter will have a significant impact on the operation of our existing health insurance plan. However, future provisions under the law which become effective in subsequent periods may impact our health insurance plan and our overall financial position. We are currently awaitingevaluating these provisions as they become effective and continue to seek guidance from the FASB and SEC related to the implications of this new legislation on accounting and disclosure requirements. We expect that this legislation will have an impact on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows, but we cannot determine the extent of the impact at this time.
     In July 2010, the FASB issued “Receivables (Topic 310): Disclosure about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses.” This guidance will require companies to provide more information about the credit quality of their financing receivables in financial statements including, but not limited to, significant purchases and sales of financing receivables, aging information and credit quality indicators. We do not currently factor our receivables. We will adopt this accounting standard upon its effective date for periods ending on or after December 15, 2010, and we do not anticipate that this adoption will have a significant impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

35


Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
     We have entered into operating lease arrangements for our light vehicle fleet, certain of our specialized equipment and for our office and field operating locations in the normal course of business. The terms of the facility leases range from monthly to ten years. The terms of the light vehicle leases range from three to four years. The terms of the specialized equipment leases range from monthly to seven years.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
     The demand, pricing and terms for oil and gas services provided by us are largely dependent upon the level of activity for the U.S. and Canadian gas industry. Industry conditions are influenced by numerous

28


factors over which we have no control, including, but not limited to: the supply of and demand for oil and gas; the level of prices, and expectations about future prices, of oil and gas; the cost of exploring for, developing, producing and delivering oil and gas; the expected rates of declining current production; the discovery rates of new oil and gas reserves; available pipeline and other transportation capacity; weather conditions; domestic and worldwide economic conditions; political instability in oil-producing countries; technical advances affecting energy consumption; the price and availability of alternative fuels; the ability of oil and gas producers to raise equity capital and debt financing; and merger and divestiture activity among oil and gas producers.
     The level of activity in the U.S. and Canadian oil and gas exploration and production industry is volatile. No assurance can be given that our expectations of trends in oil and gas production activities will reflect actual future activity levels or that demand for our services will be consistent with the general activity level of the industry. Any prolonged substantial reduction in oil and gas prices would likely affect oil and gas exploration and development efforts and therefore affect demand for our services. A material decline in oil and gas prices or U.S. and Canadian activity levels could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
     For the quarternine months ended March 31,September 30, 2010, approximately 7%5% of our revenues and approximately 4% of our total assets were denominated in Canadian dollars, our functional currency in Canada. As a result, a material decrease in the value of the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar may negatively impact our revenues, cash flows and net income. Each one percentage point change in the value of the Canadian dollar would have impacted our revenues for the quarternine months ended March 31,September 30, 2010 by approximately $0.2$0.5 million. We do not currently use hedges or forward contracts to offset this risk.
     Our Mexican operation uses the U.S. dollar as its functional currency, and as a result, all transactions and translation gains and losses are recorded currently in the financial statements.statement of operations. The balance sheet amounts are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate at the end of the month and the income statement amounts are translated at the average exchange rate for the month. We estimate that a hypothetical one percentage point change in the value of the Mexican peso relative to the U.S. dollar would have impacted our revenues for the quarternine months ended March 31,September 30, 2010 by approximately $0.1$0.4 million. Currently, we conduct a portion of our business in Mexico in the local currency, the Mexican peso.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
     Our management, under the supervision of and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such terms are defined in Rules 13a — 15(e) and 15d — 15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as of the end of the period covered by this report. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, our management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving

36


the desired control objectives, and management was required to apply its judgment in evaluating and implementing possible controls and procedures. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31,September 30, 2010 at the reasonable assurance level.
     In 2010, our management approved a plan to implement new accounting software which will replace our existing accounting systems at several of our operating divisions in a phased approach, whereby two divisions will convert during the fourth quarter of 2010 and two divisions will convert effective January 1, 2011. In addition, we are implementing a new chart of accounts which is being adopted as these divisions convert to the new software. Although we believe the new software, once implemented, will enhance our internal controls over financial reporting and we believe that we have taken the necessary steps to maintain appropriate internal control over financial reporting during this period of system change, we will continuously monitor controls through and around the system to provide reasonable assurance that controls are effective during and after each step of this implementation process.
     There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31,September 30, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

29


PART II—OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
     In the normal course of our business, we are a party to various pending or threatened claims, lawsuits and administrative proceedings seeking damages or other remedies concerning our commercial operations, products, employees and other matters, including warranty and product liability claims and occasional claims by individuals alleging exposure to hazardous materials, on the job injuries and fatalities as a result of our products or operations. Many of the claims filed against us relate to motor vehicle accidents which can result in the loss of life or serious bodily injury. Some of these claims relate to matters occurring prior to our acquisition of businesses. In certain cases, we are entitled to indemnification from the sellers of such businesses.
     Although we cannot know or predict with certainty the outcome of any claim or proceeding or the effect such outcomes may have on us, we believe that any liability resulting from the resolution of any of these matters, to the extent not otherwise provided for or covered by insurance, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
     We have historically incurred additional insurance premium related to a cost-sharing provision of our general liability insurance policy, and we cannot be certain that we will not incur additional costs until either existing claims become further developed or until the limitation periods expire for each respective policy year. Any such additional premiums should not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
     Our business faces many risks. Any of the risks discussed elsewhere in this Form 10-Q or our other SEC filings, could have a material impact on our business, financial position or results of operations. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial may also impair our business operations. For a detailed discussion of the risk factors that should be understood by any investor contemplating investment in our stock, please refer to the section entitled “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. There has been no material change to the risk factors set forth in2009 and our AnnualQuarterly Report on Form 10-K10-Q for the yearquarter ended December 31, 2009.June 30, 2010.

37


Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
     In accordance with the provisions of the 2008 Incentive Award Plan, as amended, holders of unvested restricted stock were given the option to either remit to us the required withholding taxes associated with the vesting of restricted stock, or to authorize us to repurchasepurchase shares equivalent to the cost of the withholding tax and to remit the withholding taxes on behalf of the holder. Such repurchasespurchases for the quarter ended March 31,September 30, 2010 are summarized in the following table:
                 
              (d)
              Maximum
              Number (or
              Approximate
          (c) Total Dollar
          number of Value) of
          Shares shares
          Purchased that May
      (b) as Part of Yet Be
      Average Publicly Purchased
  (a) Total Number Price Announced Under the
  of Shares Paid per Plans or Plans or
Period Purchased Share Programs Programs
January 1 — 31, 2010  109,360  $12.53   *   * 
March 1 — 31, 2010  902  $14.06   *   * 
                 
              (d)
              Maximum
              Number (or
              Approximate
          (c) Total Dollar
          number of Value) of
          Shares shares
          Purchased that May
      (b) as Part of Yet Be
      Average Publicly Purchased
  (a) Total Number Price Announced Under the
  of Shares Paid per Plans or Plans or
Period Purchased Share Programs Programs
July 1 - 31, 2010  591  $14.38   *   * 

30


 
* We do not have a publicly announced stock repurchase program. We had 1,715,9421,674,379 shares of non-vested restricted stock outstanding at March 31,September 30, 2010. The holders of these shares have the option to either remit taxes due related to the vesting of these shares or to authorize us to purchase the shares at the current market value in a sufficient amount to settle the related tax withholding. The amount purchased will depend on the market value at the time and whether or not the holders choose to surrender shares in settlement of the related tax withholding.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
Item 6. Exhibits.
     The exhibits listed in the accompanying Exhibit Index are incorporated by reference into this Item 6.

3138


SIGNATURE
     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
     
October 28, 2010COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
By: /s/ Jose A. Bayardo
  
Date: April 30, 2010 DateBy: /s/ Jose A. Bayardo  
  Jose A. BayardoSr. Vice President and  
  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
  

32


   (Duly Authorized Officer and  
Principal Financial Officer)

39


EXHIBIT INDEX
     
Exhibit    
No.   Exhibit Title
10.1*+Complete Production Services, Inc. Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan
31.1*  Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a 14(a) and Rule 15a 14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as Amended
     
31.2*  Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a 14(a) and Rule 15a 14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as Amended
     
32.1**  Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
     
32.2**  Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101**Complete Production Services, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, and September 30, 2009, (iii) the Consolidated Stockholders’ Equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, and September 30, 2009, and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (tagged as blocks of text).
 
* Filed or furnished herewith.
 
+** Management employment agreements, compensatory arrangements or option plans.Furnished herewith.

3340