UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010
Commission file number 001-2979
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
   
DelawareNo. 41-0449260
Delaware
(State of incorporation)
 No. 41-0449260
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
420 Montgomery Street, San Francisco, California 94163
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 1-866-249-3302
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
   
Yesþ
 Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
   
Yesþ
 Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
     
Large accelerated filer þ Accelerated filer¨o
Non-accelerated filer ¨o(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company¨o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
   
Yeso
 Noþ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
   
  Shares Outstanding
  July 30,October 29, 2010
Common stock, $1-2/3 par value 5,233,424,6615,248,755,643


 

FORM 10-Q
CROSS-REFERENCE INDEX
       
 
 Financial Information
    
Item 1. Financial Statements Page 
    56 
    57 
    58 
    60 
      
    61 
    6465 
    6465 
    6566 
    7576 
    8081 
    8182 
    9394 
    9596 
    9798 
    100101 
    108110 
    124126 
    126128 
    127129 
    128130 
    131133 
    139141 
       
Item 2. Management'sManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Financial Review)    
    2 
    3 
    6 
    1514 
    2017 
    2118 
  45
Critical Accounting Policies  48 
    50 
    51 
    5251 
    14053
142 
       
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk  4143 
       
Item 4. Controls and Procedures  55 
       
     
       
   142144 
       
   142144 
       
   142144 
       
   143145 
       
Signature  143145 
       
Exhibit Index  144146 
 
 EX-10.BEX-12.A
 EX-12.(a)
EX-12.(b)EX-12.B
 EX-31.A
 EX-31.B
 EX-32.A
 EX-32.B
 EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
 EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

1


PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
FINANCIAL REVIEW
SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA
                                                                
 
 % Change      % Change     
 Quarter ended June 30, 2010 from Six months ended    Quarter ended Sept. 30, 2010 from Nine months ended   
 June 30 Mar. 31 June 30 Mar. 31 June 30 June 30 June 30 %  Sept. 30, June 30, Sept. 30, June 30, Sept. 30, Sept. 30, Sept. 30, % 
($ in millions, except per share amounts) 2010 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 Change  2010 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 Change 
   
For the Period
  
Wells Fargo net income $3,062 2,547 3,172  20%  (3) 5,609 6,217  (10) $3,339 3,062 3,235  9% 3 $8,948 9,452  (5)%
Wells Fargo net income applicable to common stock 2,878 2,372 2,575 21 12 5,250 4,959 6  3,150 2,878 2,637 9 19 8,400 7,596 11 
Diluted earnings per common share 0.55 0.45 0.57 22  (4) 1.00 1.13  (12) 0.60 0.55 0.56 9 7 1.60 1.69  (5)
Profitability ratios (annualized):  
Wells Fargo net income to average assets (ROA)  1.00% 0.84 1.00 19  0.92 0.98  (6)  1.09% 1.00 1.03 9 6 0.98 1.00  (2)
Wells Fargo net income applicable to common stock to average Wells Fargo common stockholders’ equity (ROE) 10.40 8.96 13.70 16  (24) 9.69 14.07  (31) 10.90 10.40 12.04 5  (9) 10.11 13.29  (24)
Efficiency ratio (1) 59.6 56.5 56.4 5 6 58.0 56.3 3  58.7 59.6 52.0  (2) 13 58.3 54.9 6 
Total revenue $21,394 21,448 22,507   (5) 42,842 43,524  (2) $20,874 21,394 22,466  (2)  (7) $63,716 65,990  (3)
Pre-tax pre-provision profit (PTPP) (2) 8,648 9,331 9,810  (7)  (12) 17,979 19,009  (5) 8,621 8,648 10,782   (20) 26,600 29,791  (11)
Dividends declared per common share 0.05 0.05 0.05 ��  0.10 0.39  (74) 0.05 0.05 0.05   0.15 0.44  (66)
Average common shares outstanding 5,219.7 5,190.4 4,483.1 1 16 5,205.1 4,365.9 19  5,240.1 5,219.7 4,678.3  12 5,216.9 4,471.2 17 
Diluted average common shares outstanding 5,260.8 5,225.2 4,501.6 1 17 5,243.0 4,375.1 20  5,273.2 5,260.8 4,706.4  12 5,252.9 4,485.3 17 
Average loans $772,460 797,389 833,945  (3)  (7) 784,856 844,708  (7) $759,483 772,460 810,191  (2)  (6) $776,305 833,076  (7)
Average assets 1,224,180 1,226,120 1,274,926   (4) 1,225,145 1,282,280  (4) 1,220,368 1,224,180 1,246,051   (2) 1,223,535 1,270,071  (4)
Average core deposits (3) 761,767 759,169 765,697   (1) 760,475 759,845   771,957 761,767 759,319 1 2 764,345 759,668 1 
Average retail core deposits (4) 574,436 573,653 596,648   (4) 574,059 593,592  (3) 571,062 574,436 584,414  (1)  (2) 572,567 590,499  (3)
Net interest margin  4.38% 4.27 4.30 3 2 4.33 4.23 2   4.25% 4.38 4.36  (3)  (3) 4.30 4.27 1 
At Period End
  
Securities available for sale $157,927 162,487 206,795  (3)  (24) 157,927 206,795  (24) $176,875 157,927 183,814 12  (4) $176,875 183,814  (4)
Loans 766,265 781,430 821,614  (2)  (7) 766,265 821,614  (7) 753,664 766,265 799,952  (2)  (6) 753,664 799,952  (6)
Allowance for loan losses 24,584 25,123 23,035  (2) 7 24,584 23,035 7  23,939 24,584 24,028  (3)  23,939 24,028  
Goodwill 24,820 24,819 24,619  1 24,820 24,619 1  24,831 24,820 24,052  3 24,831 24,052 3 
Assets 1,225,862 1,223,630 1,284,176   (5) 1,225,862 1,284,176  (5) 1,220,784 1,225,862 1,228,625   (1) 1,220,784 1,228,625  (1)
Core deposits (3) 758,680 756,050 761,122   758,680 761,122   771,792 758,680 747,913 2 3 771,792 747,913 3 
Wells Fargo stockholders’ equity 119,772 116,142 114,623 3 4 119,772 114,623 4  123,658 119,772 122,150 3 1 123,658 122,150 1 
Total equity 121,398 118,154 121,382 3  121,398 121,382   125,165 121,398 128,924 3  (3) 125,165 128,924  (3)
Tier 1 capital (5) 101,992 98,329 102,721 4  (1) 101,992 102,721  (1) 105,609 101,992 108,785 4  (3) 105,609 108,785  (3)
Total capital (5) 141,088 137,600 144,984 3  (3) 141,088 144,984  (3) 144,094 141,088 150,079 2  (4) 144,094 150,079  (4)
Capital ratios:  
Total equity to assets  9.90% 9.66 9.45 2 5 9.90 9.45 5   10.25% 9.90 10.49 4  (2) 10.25 10.49  (2)
Risk-based capital (5)  
Tier 1 capital 10.51 9.93 9.80 6 7 10.51 9.80 7  10.90 10.51 10.63 4 3 10.90 10.63 3 
Total capital 14.53 13.90 13.84 5 5 14.53 13.84 5  14.88 14.53 14.66 2 2 14.88 14.66 2 
Tier 1 leverage (5) 8.66 8.34 8.32 4 4 8.66 8.32 4  9.01 8.66 9.03 4  9.01 9.03  
Tier 1 common equity (6) 7.61 7.09 4.49 7 69 7.61 4.49 69  8.01 7.61 5.18 5 55 8.01 5.18 55 
Book value per common share $21.35 20.76 17.91 3 19 21.35 17.91 19  $22.04 21.35 19.46 3 13 $22.04 19.46 13 
Team members (active, full-time equivalent) 267,600 267,400 269,900   (1) 267,600 269,900  (1) 266,900 267,600 265,100  1 266,900 265,100 1 
Common stock price:  
High $34.25 31.99 28.45 7 20 34.25 30.47 12  $28.77 34.25 29.56  (16)  (3) $34.25 30.47 12 
Low 25.52 26.37 13.65  (3) 87 25.52 7.80 227  23.02 25.52 22.08  (10) 4 23.02 7.80 195 
Period end 25.60 31.12 24.26  (18) 6 25.60 24.26 6  25.12 25.60 28.18  (2)  (11) 25.12 28.18  (11)
 
(1) The efficiency ratio is noninterest expense divided by total revenue (net interest income and noninterest income).
(2) Pre-tax pre-provision profit (PTPP) is total revenue less noninterest expense. Management believes that PTPP is a useful financial measure because it enables investors and others to assess the Company’s ability to generate capital to cover credit losses through a credit cycle.
(3) Core deposits are noninterest-bearing deposits, interest-bearing checking, savings certificates, certain market rate and other savings, and certain foreign deposits (Eurodollar sweep balances).
(4) Retail core deposits are total core deposits excluding Wholesale Banking core deposits and retail mortgage escrow deposits.
(5) See Note 18 (Regulatory and Agency Capital Requirements) to Financial Statements in this Report for additional information.
(6) See the “Capital Management”Management��� section in this Report for additional information.

2


This Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010, including the Financial Review and the Financial Statements and related Notes, contains forward-looking statements, which may include forecasts of our financial results and condition, expectations for our operations and business, and our assumptions for those forecasts and expectations. Do not unduly rely on forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from our forward-looking statements due to several factors. Some of these factors are described in the Financial Review and in the Financial Statements and related Notes. For a discussion of other factors, refer to the “Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors” sections in this Report and to the “Risk Factors” and “Regulation and Supervision” sections of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (2009 Form 10-K) and the “Risk Factors” section of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 (First Quarter Form 10-Q) and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 (Second Quarter Form 10-Q), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and available on the SEC’s website atwww.sec.gov.
See the Glossary of Acronyms at the end of this Report for terms used throughout the Financial Review, and Financial Statements and related Notes of this Report.
FINANCIAL REVIEW
OVERVIEW
Wells Fargo & Company is a nationwide, diversified, community-based financial services company, with $1.2 trillion in assets, providing banking, insurance, trust and investments, mortgage banking, investment banking, retail banking, brokerage and consumer finance through banking stores, the internet and other distribution channels to individuals, businesses and institutions in all 50 states, the District of Columbia (D.C.) and in other countries. We ranked fourth in assets and thirdsecond in the market value of our common stock among our large bank peers at JuneSeptember 30, 2010. When we refer to “Wells Fargo,” “the Company,” “we,” “our” or “us” in this Report, we mean Wells Fargo & Company and Subsidiaries (consolidated). When we refer to the “Parent,” we mean Wells Fargo & Company. When we refer to “legacy Wells Fargo,” we mean Wells Fargo excluding Wachovia Corporation (Wachovia), which was acquired by Wells Fargo on December 31, 2008.
Our vision is to satisfy all our customers’ financial needs, help them succeed financially, be recognized as the premier financial services company in our markets and be one of America’s great companies. Our primary strategy to achieve this vision is to increase the number of products our customers buy from us and to provide them all the financial products that will help them fulfill their needs. Our cross-sell strategy, diversified business model and the breadth of our geographic reach facilitate growth in both strong and weak economic cycles, as we can grow by expanding the number of products our current customers have with us, gain new customers in our extended markets, and increase market share in many businesses. All of our business segments contributed to earnings in second quarter 2010.
Our company earned $3.1$3.3 billion in third quarter 2010, our highest quarterly net income ever, with $0.60 diluted earnings per common share, compared with $3.2 billion ($0.550.56 diluted earnings per common share) in secondthird quarter 2010, compared with $3.2 billion ($0.57 diluted earnings per common share) in second quarter 2009. This is the fourth time since the Wachovia merger that quarterly net income was greater than $3.0 billion. Net income for the first half ofnine months ended September 30, 2010 was $5.6$8.9 billion ($1.001.60 diluted earnings per common share), compared with $6.2$9.5 billion ($1.131.69 diluted earnings per common share) forin the first halfsame period of 2009. Despite declining loan demand since early last yearTotal revenue of $20.9 billion in third quarter 2010 was down 7% from third quarter 2009, reflecting lower net interest income, the impact of changes to Regulation E and related overdraft policy changes, and lower mortgage hedging results in secondbanking results. Net interest income of $11.1 billion was down 5% from third quarter total revenue2009 driven primarily by the continued reduction of our non-strategic loan portfolios. Third quarter 2010 earnings reflected the success of the Wachovia merger and pre-tax pre-provision profit remained strong at $21.4 billion and $8.6 billion, respectively. Year-over-year growth in the franchise was driven bybenefits of our diverse businesses including commercial real estate (CRE) brokerage, wealth management, asset-based lending, merchant services, debit card and global remittance.steady commitment to our core business of helping customers

3


succeed financially. Year-over-year earnings and growth in the franchise were broad based, with all business segments contributing to our net income.
Significant items (pre-tax impact) in secondthird quarter 2010 included:
$500$650 million release of loan loss reserves (net charge-offs less provision for credit losses), reflecting improved loan portfolio performance;
$506 million of commercial purchased credit-impaired (PCI) loan resolutions, due to success in selling or settling commercial PCI loans;
$627 million of operating losses, up $468 million from a year ago, predominantly due to additional litigation accruals;
$498 million of merger integration expenses, up from $380 million in first quarter 2010; and
$137 million of severance costs for the Well Fargo Financial restructuring.
In the six quarters since$380 million approximate negative impact from changes to Regulation E and related overdraft policy changes;
$202 million of commercial PCI loan resolutions, resulting from sales or settlements; and
$476 million of merger integration expenses.
The Wachovia merger has met or exceeded our merger with Wachovia, we have earned cumulative profitsexpectations in terms of $17.9 billion reflecting the breadthlower credit losses, more abundant revenue synergies and integration savings. We achieved approximately 85% of our business modeltargeted run-rate annual cost savings of $5.0 billion by the end of third quarter 2010, and the power of the consolidation with Wachovia. Merger integration activitieswe are proceeding on track and the combined company continued to produce financial results including revenue synergies better than our original expectations. We currently expect aggregate merger costs of approximately $5.7 billion ($3.0 billion in aggregate through June 30, 2010). Integration costs were $498 million in second quarter 2010. We currently project $600 million to $650 million in merger costs per quarter in the third and fourth quarters of 2010, before these costs decline in 2011. We continue to expect to achieve $5.0 billion in annual100% of targeted cost savings upon completing the merger integration. We have achieved approximately 80% of run-rate cost savings by the end of second quarter 2010, and expect to achieve 90% by year-end 2010.integration in 2011.
Our cross-sell at legacy Wells Fargo set a record in secondthird quarter 2010 with 6.06 Wells Fargo6.08 products for retail banking households. Our goal is eight products per customer, which is approximately half of our estimate of potential demand. One of every four of our legacy Wells Fargo retail banking households has eight or more products and our average middle-market commercial banking customer has almost eight products. Wachovia retail bank households hadhousehold cross-sell continued to grow to an average of 4.88 Wachovia4.91 products. We believe there is potentially significant opportunity for growth from an increase in cross-sell to Wachovia retail bank households. For legacy Wells Fargo, our average middle-market commercial banking customer had an average of 7.7 products and an average of 6.4 products for Wholesale Banking customers. Business banking cross-sell offers another potential opportunity for growth, with cross-sell of 3.88up to 3.97 products atin the legacy Wells Fargo.Fargo footprint, including Wells Fargo and Wachovia customers.
We continued taking actions to build capital and further strengthen our balance sheet, including reducing previously identified non-strategic and liquidating loan portfolios, (including the Wells Fargo Financial liquidating portfolio), which declined by $6.9$46.8 billion in second quarter 2010 and $40.6 billion cumulatively since the Wachovia acquisition. Weacquisition and $6.2 billion in third quarter 2010 to $119.1 billion at September 30, 2010. Our capital ratios grew significantly built capital in secondthird quarter 2010, driven by strong earnings.internal capital generation, with Tier 1 common equity reaching 8.01%, up 40 basis points from second quarter 2010, and Tier 1 capital at 10.90%. The Tier 1 leverage ratio increased to 9.01%. Our capital ratios at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, were higher than they were prior to the Wachovia acquisition. Our capital ratios continuedWhile Basel III requirements are still not final, we expect to build rapidly, withbe above a 7% Tier 1 common reaching 7.61%, up 52 basis points from first quarter 2010, and Tier 1 capital at 10.51%, even withequity ratio under the May 20, 2010, purchase of $540 million of Wells Fargo warrants auctioned byproposed rules, as we currently understand them, within the U.S. Treasury. The Tier 1 leverage ratio increased to 8.66%.next few quarters. See the “Capital Management” section in this Report for more information regarding Tier 1 common equity.
As we have stated in the past, successful companies must invest in their core businesses and maintain strong balance sheets to consistently grow over the long term. In secondthird quarter 2010, we opened 13 retail banking stores for a retail network total of 6,4456,335 stores. We converted 87193 Wachovia banking stores in California in second quarter 2010 and Texas and Kansas store conversions took place in July 2010.
In July 2010 we announced that weand 170 in Alabama, Mississippi and Tennessee in late September 2010. We will be restructuring the operations of Wells Fargo Financial and closing its store networkcontinue to convert stores in the U.S. Due to the restructuring ofeastern United States this business, we recorded $137 millionyear and in severance costs in second quarter 2010. The business will largely be realigned into existing retail,

4


mortgage banking and commercial business lines. The legacy Wells Fargo Financial debt consolidation portfolio is now considered to be a liquidating or non-strategic portfolio as we are exiting the business of originating non-prime portfolio mortgage loans. Wells Fargo Financial’s other consumer loans, such as Federal Housing Administration (FHA) home loans, auto loans and credit cards, will be consolidated with similar products within Community Banking.2011.
Wells Fargo remained one of the largest providers of credit to the U.S. economy in secondthird quarter 2010. We continued to lend to creditworthy customers and, during secondthird quarter 2010, made $150$176 billion in new loans and commitments to consumer, small business and commercial customers, including $81$101 billion of residential mortgage originations. We have been an industry leader in loan modifications
Credit quality improved for homeowners, with more than half a million active and completed trial modifications between January 2009 and June 30, 2010, including 75,577Home Affordability Modification Program(HAMP) active trial and completed modifications, and 429,466 proprietary trial and completed modifications. On March 17, 2010, we announced our participation in the government’sSecond-Lien Modification Programunder HAMP to help struggling homeowners with a reduction in their home equity loan payments.
We believe credit quality has turned the corner,third consecutive quarter, with net charge-offs declining to $4.5$4.1 billion, down 16%$394 million, or 9%, from firstsecond quarter 2010 and down 17%24% from last year’s peak quarter. The significant reduction in credit losses in second quarter 2010 confirmed our prior outlook that credit losses peaked in fourth quarter 2009 and provision expense peaked in third quarter 2009. Based on declining losses and across-the-boardpeak. Reflecting improved credit quality trends,portfolio performance, we released $500$650 million in loan loss reserves (net charge-

4


offs less provision for credit losses) in secondthird quarter 2010. Absent significant deterioration in the economy, we currently expect the positive trend in charge-offsanticipate that reserve levels will continue over the coming year and expect future reductions in the allowance for loan losses.
Nonaccrual loan growth in second quarter 2010 decelerated to 2% from first quarter 2010, down significantly from prior quarters. The growth in second quarter 2010 occurred in the real estate portfolios (commercial and residential), which consist of secured loans. Nonaccrual loans in all other loan portfolios were essentially flat or down. New inflows to nonaccrual loans continued to decline (down 18% linked quarter). For additional information, see “Balance Sheet Analysis — Loan Portfolio” and Note 5 (Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses) in this Report.decline.
The improvement in credit quality was also evident in the portfolio of PCI loans, which consists of loans acquired through the Wachovia merger that were deemed to have probable loss and therefore written down at acquisition. Overall this portfolio has continued to perform in line with or better than original expectations at the time of the Wachovia merger. In particular, the Pick-a-Pay portfolioexpectations. The commercial, CRE, foreign and other consumer portfolios continued to have positive performance trends, resulting in a $1.8 billioncombined $639 million transfer from nonaccretable difference to accretable yield in secondthird quarter 2010. This increase in the accretable yield for the Pick-a-Pay portfolio is expected to be recognized as a yield adjustment to income over the remaining life of these loans, which is estimated to have a weighted-average life of eight years.loans. In addition, for commercial PCI loans, due to increased payoffs and dispositions, we reduced the associated nonaccretable difference by $506$202 million (reflected in income in the secondthird quarter).
Nonaccrual loans increased 2% from second quarter 2010, ending the quarter at $28.3 billion. The continued improvementmodest growth in credit performancethird quarter 2010 occurred primarily in commercial loans, while nonaccruals in many other portfolios were essentially flat or down. For additional information, see “Risk Management — Credit Risk Management — Nonaccrual Loans and Other Nonperforming Assets” and Note 5 (Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses) in this Report.
In working with our customers, foreclosure is always a resultlast resort, and we work hard to find other solutions through multiple discussions with customers over many months before proceeding to foreclosure. Since January 2009 we have helped over 556,000 borrowers avoid foreclosure through active and trial modifications, and have forgiven $3.5 billion of principal. Over the same period, we completed fewer than 230,000 owner-occupied foreclosure sales. We believe we have a slowly improving economy coupled with actions taken by us overhigh quality residential mortgage servicing portfolio and that our repurchase exposure related to mortgage securitizations is manageable and that our liability for mortgage loan repurchase losses of $1.3 billion at September 30, 2010, is adequate. Repurchase demands in third quarter 2010 were down linked quarter in both number and balance. See the past several years“Risk Management — Credit Risk Management — Nonaccrual Loans and Other Nonperforming Assets, — Liability for Mortgage Loan Repurchase Losses and — Risks Relating to improve underwriting standards, mitigate lossesServicing Activities” sections and exit portfolios with unattractive credit metrics. We have seen the positive impactNote 1 (Summary of these actionsSignificant Accounting Changes — Subsequent Events) to Financial Statements in the current quarterthis Report for additional information regarding our foreclosure processes, mortgage repurchase exposure and in projected losses for future quarters.servicing activities.
On July 21, 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act) became law. The Dodd-Frank Act reshapes and restructures the supervision and regulation of the financial services industry. Although the Dodd-Frank Act became generally effective in July, many of its provisions have extended implementation periods and delayed effective dates and will require extensive

5


rulemaking by regulatory authorities. The ultimate impact of the Dodd-Frank Act cannot be determined. See the “Risk Factors” section of this Report for additional information regarding the Dodd-Frank Act.

5


EARNINGS PERFORMANCE
Revenue was $21.4$20.9 billion in secondthird quarter 2010 essentially flat from first quarter 2010, and down 5% from secondcompared with $22.5 billion in third quarter 2009. Revenue for the first halfnine months of 2010 was $42.8$63.7 billion down 2% fromcompared with $66.0 billion in the same period a year ago. Net gains on mortgage loan origination/sales activities were up $835 million from a year ago, reflecting strong mortgage originations. Mortgage servicing income was down $1.4 billion from the prior year, primarily due to a decline in hedge carry income. Reflecting the breadth and growth potential of the Company’s business model, many businesses had double-digit revenue growth from secondthird quarter 2009, including merchant services, debit card, private student lending, capital finance, commercial real estate brokerage (deal flow), asset-based lending (loan volume(CRE) and syndications), merchant services (processing volume), debit cards (increased account activity) and wealth management. Mortgagereal estate investment banking revenues in second quarter 2010 were down 34% from the prior year due to lower origination volumes and a net increase in the mortgage loan repurchase reserve.(Eastdil Secured). Net interest income of $11.4$11.1 billion declined only 3%5% from a year ago despite the 7%compared with a 6% decline in average loans.
Noninterest expense of $12.7$12.3 billion in secondthird quarter 2010 was flatup 5% from a year ago. SecondThird quarter 2010 expenses included $498$476 million of merger integration costs, compared with $244$249 million a year ago, and $137 million of severance costs related to the Wells Fargo Financial restructuring. Operating losses were $627 million in second quarter 2010, up $468 million from the prior year, predominantly due to additional litigation accruals.ago. Our expenses reflect, in addition to merger integration and credit resolution expenses, our continued investment for long-term growth, hiring in regional and commercial banking as we apply the Wells Fargo business model throughout legacy Wachovia markets, and investing in technology to improve service across the franchise. As of secondthird quarter 2010, we have already realized approximately 80%85% of our targeted projected$5.0 billion annual run-rate cost savings from the Wachovia merger. The efficiency ratio was 58.7% in third quarter 2010 compared with 59.6% in second quarter 2010 compared with 56.5%and 52.0% in first quarter 2010 and 56.4% in secondthird quarter 2009, with the increase largelyfrom a year ago due to additional merger expenses, litigation accrualslower net interest income and Wells Fargo Financial’s restructuring costs.lower mortgage banking revenue.
NET INTEREST INCOME
Net interest income is the interest earned on debt securities, loans (including yield-related loan fees) and other interest-earning assets minus the interest paid for deposits, short-term borrowings and long-term debt. The net interest margin is the average yield on earning assets minus the average interest rate paid for deposits and our other sources of funding. Net interest income and the net interest margin are presented on a taxable-equivalent basis to consistently reflect income from taxable and tax-exempt loans and securities based on a 35% federal statutory tax rate.
Net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis was $11.6$11.3 billion in secondthird quarter 2010 and $11.9 billion in secondthird quarter 2009, reflecting a decline in average loans, including a reduction in loans in the liquidating portfolios. Continued strong growth in consumer and commercial checking and savings accounts partially offset the impact on income from the decline in loans. The net interest margin was 4.38%4.25% in secondthird quarter 2010 updown from 4.30%4.36% a year ago, due to additionalthe continued run-off of non-strategic loan portfolios (including Pick-a-Pay mortgage, legacy Wells Fargo Financial indirect auto, and commercial and CRE PCI loans), which tend to have higher yields but also higher charge-offs than loans in our on-going loan resolution income and the benefit of lower deposit and market funding costs. portfolios.
Average earning assets were $1.1 trillion in secondthird quarter 2010, flat compared with secondthird quarter 2009. Average loans decreased to $772.5$759.5 billion in secondthird quarter 2010 from $833.9$810.2 billion a year ago. We continued to supply significant amounts of credit to consumers and businesses in secondthird quarter 2010, although loan demand remained soft. We continued to reduce high-risk/non-strategic loans (including Pick-a-Pay mortgage, legacy Wells Fargo Financial debt consolidation, and commercial and commercial real estate PCI loans), which were down $26.1 billion in second quarter 2010 from a year ago.2010. Average mortgages held for sale (MHFS) were $32.2$38.1 billion in secondthird quarter 2010, down from $43.2$40.6 billion a year ago. Average debt securities available for sale were $157.6$158.3 billion in secondthird quarter 2010, down from $179.0$186.3 billion a year ago.

6


Core deposits are a low-cost source of funding and thus have an important contributor toinfluence on net interest income and the net interest margin. Core deposits include noninterest-bearing deposits, interest-bearing checking, savings certificates, certain market rate and other savings, and certain foreign deposits (Eurodollar sweep balances). Average core deposits declinedincreased to $761.8$772.0 billion in secondthird quarter 2010 from $765.7$759.3 billion in secondthird quarter 2009, and funded 99%102% and 92%94% of average loans in the same periods, respectively. Average checking and savings deposits, typically the lowest cost deposits, represented about 88%89% of our average core deposits, one of the highest percentages in the industry. Average certificatesCertificates of deposit (CDs) declined $63$37.6 billion from secondthird quarter 2009, predominantly the result of $57including approximately $21 billion of higher-cost Wachovia CDs maturing,that matured, yet total average core deposits were down only $3.9up $23.9 billion from a year ago. Of average core deposits, $672.0$686.9 billion represent transaction accounts or low-cost savings accounts from consumer and commercial customers, which increased 10%9% from $613.3$629.6 billion in secondthird quarter 2009. Total average retail core deposits, which exclude Wholesale Banking core deposits and retail mortgage escrow deposits, decreased to $574.4$571.1 billion for secondthird quarter 2010 from $596.6$584.4 billion a year ago. Average mortgage escrow deposits were $25.7$30.2 billion in secondthird quarter 2010, compared with $32.0$28.7 billion a year ago. Average certificates of deposits decreased to $89.8$85.0 billion in secondthird quarter 2010 from $152.4$129.7 billion a year ago. Total average interest-bearing deposits decreased to $635.4were $631.2 billion in secondthird quarter 2010 from $638.0compared with $633.4 billion a year ago.
The following table presents the individual components of net interest income and the net interest margin.

7


AVERAGE BALANCES, YIELDS AND RATES PAID (TAXABLE-EQUIVALENT BASIS) (1)(2)
                                                
 
 Quarter ended June 30 Quarter ended September 30,
 2010 2009  2010 2009 
 Interest Interest  Interest Interest 
 Average Yields/ income/ Average Yields/ income/  Average Yields/ income/ Average Yields/ income/ 
(in millions) balance rates expense balance rates expense  balance rates expense balance rates expense 
   
Earning assets
  
Federal funds sold, securities purchased under resale agreements and other short-term investments $67,712  0.33% $56 20,889  0.66% $34  $70,839  0.38% $67 16,356  0.66% $27 
Trading assets 28,760 3.79 272 18,464 4.61 213  29,080 3.77 275 20,518 4.29 221 
Debt securities available for sale (3):  
Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies 2,094 3.50 18 2,102 3.45 17  1,673 2.79 11 2,545 3.79 24 
Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions 16,192 6.48 255 12,189 6.47 206  17,220 5.89 249 12,818 6.28 204 
Mortgage-backed securities:  
Federal agencies 72,876 5.39 930 92,550 5.36 1,203  70,486 5.35 885 94,457 5.34 1,221 
Residential and commercial 33,197 9.59 769 41,257 9.03 1,044  33,425 12.53 987 43,214 9.56 1,089 
               
Total mortgage-backed securities 106,073 6.72 1,699 133,807 6.60 2,247  103,911 7.67 1,872 137,671 6.75 2,310 
Other debt securities (4) 33,270 7.21 562 30,901 7.23 572  35,533 6.02 503 33,294 7.00 568 
               
Total debt securities available for sale (4) 157,629 6.75 2,534 178,999 6.67 3,042 
Total debt securities available for sale(4) 158,337 7.05 2,635 186,328 6.72 3,106 
Mortgages held for sale (5) 32,196 5.04 405 43,177 5.05 545  38,073 4.72 449 40,604 5.16 524 
Loans held for sale (5) 4,386 2.73 30 7,188 2.83 50  3,223 2.71 22 4,975 2.67 34 
Loans:  
Commercial and commercial real estate:  
Commercial 147,965 5.44 2,009 187,501 4.11 1,922  146,139 4.57 1,679 175,642 4.34 1,919 
Real estate mortgage 97,731 3.89 949 96,131 3.52 843  99,082 4.15 1,036 95,612 3.45 832 
Real estate construction 33,060 3.44 284 42,023 2.71 284  29,469 3.31 246 40,487 2.94 300 
Lease financing 13,622 9.54 325 14,750 9.22 340  13,156 9.07 298 14,360 9.14 328 
               
Total commercial and commercial real estate 292,378 4.89 3,567 340,405 3.99 3,389  287,846 4.50 3,259 326,101 4.12 3,379 
               
Consumer:  
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage 237,500 5.24 3,108 240,798 5.53 3,328  231,172 5.16 2,987 235,051 5.35 3,154 
Real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage 102,678 4.53 1,162 108,422 4.77 1,290  100,257 4.41 1,114 105,779 4.62 1,229 
Credit card 22,239 13.24 736 22,963 12.74 731  22,048 13.57 748 23,448 11.65 683 
Other revolving credit and installment 88,617 6.57 1,452 90,729 6.64 1,502  87,884 6.50 1,441 90,199 6.48 1,473 
               
Total consumer 451,034 5.74 6,458 462,912 5.93 6,851  441,361 5.68 6,290 454,477 5.73 6,539 
               
Foreign 29,048 3.62 262 30,628 4.06 310  30,276 3.15 240 29,613 3.61 270 
               
Total loans (5) 772,460 5.34 10,287 833,945 5.07 10,550 
Total loans(5) 759,483 5.13 9,789 810,191 5.00 10,188 
Other 6,082 3.44 53 6,079 2.91 45  5,912 3.53 53 6,088 3.29 49 
               
Total earning assets $1,069,225  5.14% $13,637 1,108,741  5.21% $14,479  $1,064,947  5.01% $13,290 1,085,060  5.20% $14,149 
               
Funding sources
  
Deposits:  
Interest-bearing checking $61,212  0.13% $19 79,955  0.13% $26  $59,677  0.10% $15 59,467  0.15% $21 
Market rate and other savings 412,062 0.26 267 334,067 0.40 336  419,996 0.25 269 369,120 0.34 317 
Savings certificates 89,773 1.44 323 152,444 1.19 451  85,044 1.50 322 129,698 1.35 442 
Other time deposits 14,936 1.90 72 21,660 2.00 108  14,400 2.33 83 18,248 1.93 89 
Deposits in foreign offices 57,461 0.23 33 49,885 0.29 36  52,061 0.24 32 56,820 0.25 36 
               
Total interest-bearing deposits 635,444 0.45 714 638,011 0.60 957  631,178 0.45 721 633,353 0.57 905 
Short-term borrowings 45,082 0.22 25 59,844 0.39 58  46,468 0.26 31 39,828 0.35 36 
Long-term debt 195,440 2.52 1,233 235,590 2.52 1,484  177,077 2.76 1,226 222,580 2.33 1,301 
Other liabilities 6,737 3.33 55 4,604 3.45 40  6,764 3.39 58 5,620 3.30 46 
               
Total interest-bearing liabilities 882,703 0.92 2,027 938,049 1.08 2,539  861,487 0.94 2,036 901,381 1.01 2,288 
Portion of noninterest-bearing funding sources 186,522   170,692    203,460   183,679   
               
Total funding sources $1,069,225 0.76 2,027 1,108,741 0.91 2,539  $1,064,947 0.76 2,036 1,085,060 0.84 2,288 
               
Net interest margin and net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis (6)
  4.38% $11,610  4.30% $11,940   4.25% $11,254  4.36% $11,861 
         
Noninterest-earning assets
  
Cash and due from banks $17,415 19,340  $17,000 18,084 
Goodwill 24,820 24,261  24,829 24,435 
Other 112,720 122,584  113,592 118,472 
       
Total noninterest-earning assets $154,955 166,185  $155,421 160,991 
       
Noninterest-bearing funding sources
  
Deposits $176,908 174,529  $184,837 172,588 
Other liabilities 43,713 49,570  50,013 47,646 
Total equity 120,856 112,778  124,031 124,436 
Noninterest-bearing funding sources used to fund earning assets  (186,522)  (170,692)   (203,460)  (183,679) 
       
Net noninterest-bearing funding sources $154,955 166,185  $155,421 160,991 
       
Total assets
 $1,224,180 1,274,926  $1,220,368 1,246,051 
       
 
(1) Our average prime rate was 3.25% for the quarters and nine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 and 2009, and 3.25% for the first half of 2010 and 2009. The average three-month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) was 0.44%0.39% and 0.84%0.41% for the quarters ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and 0.35%0.36% and 1.04%0.83% for the first halfnine months of 2010 and 2009, respectively.
(2) Interest rates and amounts include the effects of hedge and risk management activities associated with the respective asset and liability categories.
(3) Yields and rates are based on interest income/expense amounts for the period, annualized based on the accrual basis for the respective accounts. The average balance amounts include the effects of any unrealized gain or loss marks but those marks carried in other comprehensive income are not included in yield determination of affected earning assets. Thus yields are based on amortized cost balances computed on a settlement date basis.
(4) Includes certain preferred securities.
(5) Nonaccrual loans and related income are included in their respective loan categories.
(6) Includes taxable-equivalent adjustments primarily related to tax-exempt income on certain loans and securities. The federal statutory tax rate was 35% for the periods presented.

8


                                                
 
 Six months ended June 30 Nine months ended September 30,
 2010 2009  2010 2009 
 Interest Interest  Interest Interest 
 Average Yields/ income/ Average Yields/ income/  Average Yields/ income/ Average Yields/ income/ 
(in millions) balance rates expense balance rates expense  balance rates expense balance rates expense 
   
Earning assets
  
Federal funds sold, securities purchased under resale agreements and other short-term investments $54,347  0.33% $89 22,472  0.75% $84  $59,905  0.35% $156 20,411  0.73% $111 
Trading assets 28,338 3.85 544 20,323 4.81 488  28,588 3.82 819 20,389 4.64 709 
Debt securities available for sale (3):  
Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies 2,186 3.56 38 2,498 2.00 24  2,013 3.36 49 2,514 2.61 48 
Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions 14,951 6.53 476 12,201 6.45 419  15,716 6.29 725 12,409 6.39 623 
Mortgage-backed securities:  
Federal agencies 76,284 5.39 1,953 84,592 5.51 2,271  74,330 5.38 2,838 87,916 5.45 3,492 
Residential and commercial 32,984 9.63 1,559 39,980 8.80 2,061  33,133 10.58 2,546 41,070 9.05 3,150 
               
Total mortgage-backed securities 109,268 6.70 3,512 124,572 6.71 4,332  107,463 7.01 5,384 128,986 6.72 6,642 
Other debt securities (4) 32,810 6.86 1,054 30,493 7.02 1,123  33,727 6.56 1,557 31,437 7.01 1,691 
               
Total debt securities available for sale (4) 159,215 6.67 5,080 169,764 6.68 5,898 
Total debt securities available for sale(4) 158,919 6.80 7,715 175,346 6.69 9,004 
Mortgages held for sale (5) 31,784 4.99 792 37,151 5.17 960  33,903 4.88 1,241 38,315 5.16 1,484 
Loans held for sale (5) 5,390 2.39 64 7,567 3.13 117  4,660 2.46 86 6,693 3.01 151 
Loans:  
Commercial and commercial real estate:  
Commercial 152,192 4.97 3,752 192,186 3.99 3,806  150,153 4.83 5,431 186,610 4.10 5,725 
Real estate mortgage 97,848 3.79 1,839 96,087 3.52 1,678  98,264 3.91 2,875 95,928 3.50 2,510 
Real estate construction 34,448 3.25 555 42,370 2.86 601  32,770 3.27 801 41,735 2.89 901 
Lease financing 13,814 9.38 648 15,277 8.99 687  13,592 9.28 946 14,968 9.04 1,015 
               
Total commercial and commercial real estate 298,302 4.59 6,794 345,920 3.94 6,772  294,779 4.56 10,053 339,241 4.00 10,151 
               
Consumer:  
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage 241,241 5.25 6,318 243,133 5.59 6,772  237,848 5.22 9,305 240,409 5.51 9,926 
Real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage 104,151 4.50 2,330 109,270 4.91 2,665  102,839 4.47 3,444 108,094 4.81 3,894 
Credit card 22,789 13.20 1,503 23,128 12.42 1,435  22,539 13.32 2,251 23,236 12.16 2,118 
Other revolving credit and installment 89,566 6.49 2,879 91,770 6.66 3,029  88,998 6.49 4,320 91,240 6.60 4,502 
               
Total consumer 457,747 5.72 13,030 467,301 5.98 13,901  452,224 5.70 19,320 462,979 5.90 20,440 
               
Foreign 28,807 3.62 518 31,487 4.22 659  29,302 3.46 758 30,856 4.02 929 
               
Total loans (5) 784,856 5.21 20,342 844,708 5.08 21,332 
Total loans(5) 776,305 5.18 30,131 833,076 5.05 31,520 
Other 6,075 3.40 103 6,110 2.89 88  6,021 3.45 156 6,102 3.02 137 
               
Total earning assets $1,070,005  5.10% $27,014 1,108,095  5.22% $28,967  $1,068,301  5.07% $40,304 1,100,332  5.21% $43,116 
               
Funding sources
  
Deposits:  
Interest-bearing checking $61,614  0.14% $42 80,173  0.14% $56  $60,961  0.13% $57 73,195  0.14% $77 
Market rate and other savings 408,026 0.27 553 323,813 0.47 755  412,060 0.27 822 339,081 0.42 1,072 
Savings certificates 92,254 1.40 640 161,234 1.05 838  89,824 1.43 962 150,607 1.14 1,280 
Other time deposits 15,405 1.97 152 23,597 1.98 232  15,066 2.08 235 21,794 1.97 321 
Deposits in foreign offices 56,453 0.22 62 47,901 0.32 75  54,973 0.23 94 50,907 0.29 111 
               
Total interest-bearing deposits 633,752 0.46 1,449 636,718 0.62 1,956  632,884 0.46 2,170 635,584 0.60 2,861 
Short-term borrowings 45,082 0.20 44 67,911 0.54 181  45,549 0.22 75 58,447 0.50 217 
Long-term debt 202,186 2.48 2,509 247,209 2.65 3,267  193,724 2.57 3,735 238,909 2.55 4,568 
Other liabilities 6,203 3.38 104 4,194 3.64 76  6,393 3.38 162 4,675 3.50 122 
               
Total interest-bearing liabilities 887,223 0.93 4,106 956,032 1.15 5,480  878,550 0.93 6,142 937,615 1.11 7,768 
Portion of noninterest-bearing funding sources 182,782   152,063    189,751   162,717   
               
Total funding sources $1,070,005 0.77 4,106 1,108,095 0.99 5,480  $1,068,301 0.77 6,142 1,100,332 0.94 7,768 
               
Net interest margin and net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis (6)
  4.33% $22,908  4.23% $23,487   4.30% $34,162  4.27% $35,348 
         
Noninterest-earning assets
  
Cash and due from banks $17,730 19,795  $17,484 19,218 
Goodwill 24,818 23,725  24,822 23,964 
Other 112,592 130,665  112,928 126,557 
       
Total noninterest-earning assets $155,140 174,185  $155,234 169,739 
       
Noninterest-bearing funding sources
  
Deposits $174,487 167,458  $177,975 169,187 
Other liabilities 44,224 50,064  46,174 49,249 
Total equity 119,211 108,726  120,836 114,020 
Noninterest-bearing funding sources used to fund earning assets  (182,782)  (152,063)   (189,751)  (162,717) 
       
Net noninterest-bearing funding sources $155,140 174,185  $155,234 169,739 
       
Total assets
 $1,225,145 1,282,280  $1,223,535 1,270,071 
       
 

9


NONINTEREST INCOME
                         
  
  Quarter ended June 30 %  Six months ended June 30 % 
(in millions) 2010  2009  Change  2010  2009  Change 
  
Service charges on deposit accounts $1,417   1,448   (2)% $2,749   2,842   (3)%
Trust and investment fees:                        
Trust, investment and IRA fees  1,035   839   23   2,084   1,561   34 
Commissions and all other fees  1,708   1,574   9   3,328   3,067   9 
             
Total trust and investment fees  2,743   2,413   14   5,412   4,628   17 
             
Card fees  911   923   (1)  1,776   1,776    
Other fees:                        
Cash network fees  58   58      113   116   (3)
Charges and fees on loans  401   440   (9)  820   873   (6)
Processing and all other fees  523   465   12   990   875   13 
             
Total other fees  982   963   2   1,923   1,864   3 
             
Mortgage banking (1):                        
Servicing income, net  1,218   816   49   2,584   1,722   50 
Net gains on mortgage loan origination/sales activities  793   2,230   (64)  1,897   3,828   (50)
             
Total mortgage banking  2,011   3,046   (34)  4,481   5,550   (19)
             
Insurance  544   595   (9)  1,165   1,176   (1)
Net gains from trading activities  109   749   (85)  646   1,536   (58)
Net gains (losses) on debt securities available for sale  30   (78) NM   58   (197) NM 
Net gains (losses) from equity investments  288   40   620   331   (117) NM 
Operating leases  329   168   96   514   298   72 
All other  581   476   22   1,191   1,028   16 
             
Total $9,945   10,743   (7) $20,246   20,384   (1)
  
  
NM — Not meaningful
                         
 
  Quarter ended Sept. 30, %  Nine months ended Sept. 30, % 
(in millions) 2010  2009  Change  2010  2009  Change 
  
Service charges on deposit accounts $1,132   1,478   (23)% $3,881   4,320   (10)%
Trust and investment fees:                        
Trust, investment and IRA fees  924   989   (7)  3,008   2,550   18 
Commissions and all other fees  1,640   1,513   8   4,968   4,580   8 
             
Total trust and investment fees  2,564   2,502   2   7,976   7,130   12 
             
Card fees  935   946   (1)  2,711   2,722    
Other fees:                        
Cash network fees  73   60   22   186   176   6 
Charges and fees on loans  424   453   (6)  1,244   1,326   (6)
Processing and all other fees  507   437   16   1,497   1,312   14 
             
Total other fees  1,004   950   6   2,927   2,814   4 
             
Mortgage banking (1):                        
Servicing income, net  516   1,919   (73)  3,100   3,641   (15)
Net gains on mortgage loan origination/sales activities  1,983   1,148   73   3,880   4,976   (22)
             
Total mortgage banking  2,499   3,067   (19)  6,980   8,617   (19)
             
Insurance  397   468   (15)  1,562   1,644   (5)
Net gains from trading activities  470   622   (24)  1,116   2,158   (48)
Net losses on debt securities available for sale  (114)  (40)  185   (56)  (237)  (76)
Net gains (losses) from equity investments  131   29   352   462   (88) NM
Operating leases  222   224   (1)  736   522   41 
All other  536   536      1,727   1,564   10 
             
Total $9,776   10,782   (9) $30,022   31,166   (4)
  
 
NM — Not meaningful
(1) 2009 categories have been revised to conform to current presentation.
Noninterest income represented 46% and 47% of total revenues for both the secondthird quarter and first halfnine months of 2010, respectively, compared with 48% and 47%, respectively, for the same periods a year ago. NoninterestThird quarter 2010 noninterest income was down 7%9% year over year, predominantlyprimarily due to lower mortgage banking hedge results.results, partially offset by increased gains on mortgage loan origination/sales activities.
The Federal Reserve Board (FRB) announced regulatoryService charges on deposit accounts were $1.1 billion in third quarter 2010, down 23% from a year ago primarily due to the negative impact from changes to debit cardRegulation E and ATMrelated overdraft practices in fourth quarter 2009. In third quarter 2009, we also announced policy changes that should help customers limit overdraft and returned item fees.changes. We currently estimate that the combination of these changes will reduce our 2010 fee revenue by approximately $225 million (after tax) in third quarter 2010 and $275 million in fourth quarter 2010.2010 by approximately $440 million. The actual impact in fourth quarter 2010 and future periods could vary due to a variety of factors, including changes in customer behavior, economic conditions and other potential offsetting factors.
We earn fees on trust, investment and IRA (Individual Retirement Account) accounts from managing and administering assets, including mutual funds, corporate trust, personal trust, employee benefit trust and agency assets. At JuneSeptember 30, 2010, these assets totaled $1.9$2.0 trillion, up 12%11% from $1.7$1.8 trillion a year ago, primarily reflecting a 12%an 8% increase in the S&P 500 over the same period. Trust, investment and IRA fees are primarily based on a tiered scale relative to the market value of the assets under management or administration. These fees increaseddecreased to $1.0 billion$924 million in secondthird quarter 2010 from $839$989 million a year ago.
We received commissions and other fees for providing services to full-service and discount brokerage customers of $1.7$1.6 billion in secondthird quarter 2010 and $1.6$1.5 billion a year ago. These fees include transactional commissions, which are based on the number of transactions executed at the customer’s direction, and asset-based fees, which are based on the market value of the customer’s assets. Client assets totaled $1.1 trillion at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, up 4% from $1.0 trillion a year ago. Commissions and other fees also include fees from investment banking activities including equity and bond underwriting.

10


Card fees were $911$935 million in secondthird quarter 2010, down from $923$946 million a year ago. Recent legislative and regulatory changes limit our ability to increase interest rates and assess certain fees on card accounts.

10


The anticipated net impact in thirdfourth quarter 2010 related to these changes is estimated to be $30 million (after tax).$47 million. The actual impact in 2010 and future periods could vary due to a variety of factors, including changes in customer behavior, economic conditions and other potential offsetting factors.
Mortgage banking noninterest income was $2.0$2.5 billion in secondthird quarter 2010, down from $3.0$3.1 billion a year ago. The reduction in mortgage banking noninterest income is primarily driven by the declineAn $835 million increase in net gains on mortgage loan origination/sales activities offrom a year ago was more than offset by a $1.4 billion decline in net servicing income.
Net gains on mortgage loan origination/sales activities increased to $793 million for second$2.0 billion in third quarter 2010, up $835 million from $2.2 billion for second quarter 2009,a year ago. This increase was primarily due to lowerhigher origination volumes and a net increasebusiness margins in thethis low mortgage loan repurchase reserve.interest rate environment. Residential real estate originations were $81$101 billion in secondthird quarter 2010, down 37%up 5% from $129$96 billion a year ago.ago and mortgage applications were $194 billion in third quarter 2010 compared with $123 billion for third quarter 2009. The 1-4 family first mortgage unclosed pipeline was $68$101 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, and $57 billion at December 31, 2009. For additional information, see
Net servicing income decreased to $516 million in third quarter 2010 from $1.9 billion a year ago. Net servicing income includes both changes in the fair value of mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) during the period as well as changes in the value of derivatives (economic hedges) used to hedge the MSRs. Net servicing income for third quarter 2010 included a $56 million net MSRs valuation gain ($1.1 billion decrease in the fair value of the MSRs partially offsetting a $1.2 billion hedge gain) and for third quarter 2009 included a $1.5 billion net MSRs valuation gain ($2.1 billion decrease in the fair value of MSRs partially offsetting a $3.6 billion hedge gain). The $1.5 billion decline in the net MSR hedge results for third quarter 2010 compared with third quarter 2009 is primarily due to a decline in hedge carry income, which resulted from the combination of a reduced level of financial hedges, given a lower MSR asset value and an increased reliance on the “natural business hedge” and lower rate of carry resulting from lower interest rates and mix of financial instruments. See the “Risk Management — Mortgage Banking Interest Rate and Market Risk” section of this Report for additional information regarding our MSRs risks and Note 1 (Summaryhedging approach. At September 30, 2010, the ratio of Significant Accounting Policies), Note 8 (Mortgage Banking Activities) and Note 12 (Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities)MSRs to Financial Statements in this Report.related loans serviced for others was 0.72% compared with 0.91% at December 31, 2009. The average note rate was 5.46% at September 30, 2010, compared with 5.66% at December 31, 2009.
Net gains on mortgage loan origination/sales activities include the cost of any additions to the liability for mortgage loan repurchase reservelosses as well as adjustments of loans in the warehouse/pipeline for changes in market conditions that affect their value. Mortgage loans are repurchased based on standard representations and warranties and early payment default clauses in mortgage sale contracts. Additions to the liability for mortgage loan repurchase reservelosses that were charged against net gains on mortgage loan origination/sales activities during second quarter 2010 were $382$370 million and $784 million$1.2 billion, respectively, for the first half ofthree and nine months ended September 30, 2010. For additional information about mortgage loan repurchases, see the “Risk Management — Credit Risk Management Process — ReserveLiability for Mortgage Loan Repurchase Losses” section and Note 7 (Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities) to Financial Statements in this Report.
The reduction in net gains on mortgage loan origination/sales activities was partially offset by an increase in net servicing income. Net servicing income increased $402 million from a year ago primarily due to growth in the servicing portfolio, reduced mortgage servicing rights (MSR) amortization due to lower payoffs, and lower servicing foreclosure costs due to more loan modifications and loss mitigation activities in addition to stabilization in the delinquencies in our servicing portfolio. In addition to servicing fees, net servicing income includes both changes in the fair value of MSRs during the period as well as changes in the value of derivatives (economic hedges) used to hedge the MSRs. Net servicing income for second quarter 2010 included a $626 million net MSRs valuation gain ($2.7 billion decrease in the fair value of the MSRs offsetting a $3.3 billion hedge gain) and for second quarter 2009 included a $1.0 billion net MSRs valuation gain ($2.3 billion increase in the fair value of MSRs partially offsetting a $1.3 billion hedge loss). See the “Risk Management — Mortgage Banking Interest Rate and Market Risk” section of this Report for additional information regarding our MSRs risks and hedging approach. At June 30, 2010, the ratio of MSRs to related loans serviced for others was 0.76% compared with 0.91% at December 31, 2009. The average note rate was 5.53%, the lowest since we reentered the servicing business.
Income from trading activities was a $109$470 million gain in secondthird quarter 2010, down from a $749$622 million gain a year ago. This decrease was driven by challenging market conditions andreflects a return to a more normal trading environment from a year ago as well as a continued reductionsreduction in risk positions in this business, since the merger with Wachovia,levels while continuingwe continue to prioritize support for our customer-related activities.
Aggregate net gains on debt securities available for sale and equity securities totaled $318$17 million in secondthird quarter 2010, compared with net losses of $38$11 million a year ago. The year-over-yearImpairment write-downs were $179 million in third quarter 2010, compared with $396 million a year ago. For additional information,

11


improvement was due to lower impairment write-downs of $168 million in second quarter 2010, down from $463 million a year ago. For additional information, see the “Balance Sheet Analysis — Securities Available for Sale” section and Note 4 (Securities Available for Sale) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Operating lease income was $329 million in second quarter 2010, up $161 million from a year ago primarily due to gains on early lease terminations.
The increase in “All other” noninterest income to $581 million in second quarter 2010 from $476 million a year ago was due to gains on loan sales.
NONINTEREST EXPENSE
                                                
 
 Quarter ended June 30 % Six months ended June 30 %  Quarter ended Sept. 30, % Nine months ended Sept. 30, % 
(in millions) 2010 2009 Change 2010 2009 Change  2010 2009 Change 2010 2009 Change 
   
Salaries $3,564 3,438  4% $6,878 6,824 1% $3,478 3,428  1% $10,356 10,252  1%
Commission and incentive compensation 2,225 2,060 8 4,217 3,884 9  2,280 2,051 11 6,497 5,935 9 
Employee benefits 1,063 1,227  (13) 2,385 2,511  (5) 1,074 1,034 4 3,459 3,545  (2)
Equipment 588 575 2 1,266 1,262   557 563  (1) 1,823 1,825  
Net occupancy 742 783  (5) 1,538 1,579  (3) 742 778  (5) 2,280 2,357  (3)
Core deposit and other intangibles 553 646  (14) 1,102 1,293  (15) 548 642  (15) 1,650 1,935  (15)
FDIC and other deposit assessments 295 981  (70) 596 1,319  (55) 300 228 32 896 1,547  (42)
Outside professional services 572 451 27 1,056 861 23  533 489 9 1,589 1,350 18 
Contract services 384 256 50 731 472 55  430 254 69 1,161 726 60 
Foreclosed assets 333 187 78 719 435 65  366 243 51 1,085 678 60 
Outside data processing 276 282  (2) 548 494 11  263 251 5 811 745 9 
Postage, stationery and supplies 230 240  (4) 472 490  (4) 233 211 10 705 701 1 
Operating losses 627 159 294 835 331 152  230 117 97 1,065 448 138 
Insurance 164 259  (37) 312 526  (41) 62 208  (70) 374 734  (49)
Telecommunications 156 164  (5) 299 322  (7) 146 142 3 445 464  (4)
Travel and entertainment 196 131 50 367 236 56  195 151 29 562 387 45 
Advertising and promotion 156 111 41 268 236 14  170 160 6 438 396 11 
Operating leases 27 61  (56) 64 131  (51) 21 52  (60) 85 183  (54)
All other 595 686  (13) 1,210 1,309  (8) 625 682  (8) 1,835 1,991  (8)
       
Total $12,746 12,697  $24,863 24,515 1  $12,253 11,684 5 $37,116 36,199 3 
   
 
Noninterest expense was $12.7$12.3 billion in secondthird quarter 2010, flatup 5% compared with $12.7$11.7 billion in secondthird quarter 2009, and included $498 million and $244 million of2009. Noninterest expense continued to be elevated by merger integration expenses, and higher credit and resolution costs, for the same periods, respectively. Noninterest expenseincluding expenses associated with foreclosed assets, loan modifications and other home preservation activities. Merger integrations costs were $476 million in secondthird quarter 2010 also included $137compared with $249 million of severance costs related to the Wells Fargo Financial restructuring.a year ago. Foreclosed assets expense was $333$366 million in secondthird quarter 2010, up 78%51% from a year ago due to a $2.5$3.6 billion increase in foreclosed assets year over year, including $1.6$2.1 billion of foreclosed loans in the PCI portfolio that are now recorded as foreclosed assets. Operating losses were $627 million, up $468 million from a year ago, predominantly due to additional litigation accruals.
The $128 million increase in contract services from a year ago was merger related. Of our approximately $5.7 billion of estimated total Wachovia merger integration costs ($3.0 billion in aggregate through June 30, 2010), we expect to incur approximately $2.1 billion in 2010, of which $878 million was recorded in the first half of 2010, as we convert banking stores and lines of business, and continue to build infrastructure.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and other deposit assessments were $295 million in second quarter 2010, down from $981 million a year ago, which included additional assessments related to the FDIC Transaction Account Guarantee Program and the FDIC special assessment of $565 million. The $95$146 million decline in insurance expense from secondthird quarter 2009 was predominantlymostly due to lower insurance reservesreserve increases at our captive mortgage reinsurance operation for secondthird quarter 2009.2010 compared with a year ago.
In addition to merger integration, weWe continued to invest for long-term growth throughout the Company, hiring in regional banking and commercial banking as we apply Wells Fargo’s model to the eastern markets, and investing in technology to improve service across our franchise. Our current expense base is elevated by integration and workout costs, which should decline over time. In addition, we are looking at other ways to reduce cost by simplifying and streamlining our activities and processes throughout the Company. We converted 87363 Wachovia

12


banking stores in CaliforniaTexas, Kansas, Alabama, Mississippi and Tennessee in secondthird quarter 2010 and opened 13 banking stores in the quarter for a retail network total of 6,4456,335 stores.
INCOME TAX EXPENSE
Our effective income tax rate was 33.1%34.4% in secondthird quarter 2010, up from 31.8%29.5% in secondthird quarter 2009, and was 34.2%34.3% for the first halfnine months of 2010, up from 32.8%31.7% for the first halfnine months of 2009. The increase for the first halfnine months of 2010 was partly due to additional tax expense in 2010 related to the new health care legislation, and fewer favorable settlements with tax authorities.authorities and a reduction in tax-advantaged income, including interest and dividends.

12


OPERATING SEGMENT RESULTS
We have three lines of business for management reporting: Community Banking; Wholesale Banking; and Wealth, Brokerage and Retirement. We define our operating segments by product and customer. Our management accounting process measures the performance of the operating segments based on our management structure and is not necessarily comparable with similar information for other financial services companies.
The table below and the following discussion present our results by operating segment. For a more complete description of our operating segments, including additional financial information and the underlying management accounting process, see Note 16 (Operating Segments) to Financial Statements in this Report.
OPERATING SEGMENT RESULTS — HIGHLIGHTS
                                                
 
 Wealth, Brokerage  Wealth, Brokerage 
 Community Banking Wholesale Banking and Retirement  Community Banking Wholesale Banking and Retirement 
(in billions) 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009  2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 
   
Quarter ended June 30,
 
Quarter ended September 30,
 
Revenue
 $13.7 15.2 5.7 5.2 2.9 2.8  $13.6 15.6 5.2 4.9 2.9 2.8 
Net income 1.8 2.1 1.4 1.1 0.3 0.3  2.0 2.7 1.4 0.6 0.3 0.1 
   
Average loans 539.1 565.8 223.4 258.4 42.6 46.0  527.0 553.2 222.5 247.0 42.6 45.4 
Average core deposits 533.4 565.6 161.5 137.4 121.5 113.5  535.7 550.2 172.2 146.8 120.7 116.3 
   
Six months ended June 30,
 
 
Nine months ended September 30,
 
Revenue $27.8 29.6 11.0 10.1 5.8 5.3  $41.4 45.2 16.2 15.1 8.7 8.1 
Net income 3.2 4.0 2.6 2.2 0.6 0.4  5.2 6.8 4.1 2.8 0.8 0.5 
   
Average loans 547.1 566.8 227.8 268.3 43.2 46.3  540.3 562.2 226.0 261.1 43.0 46.0 
Average core deposits 532.8 560.3 161.2 138.5 121.3 108.2  533.7 556.9 164.9 141.3 121.1 110.9 
   
Community Bankingoffers a complete line of diversified financial products and services for consumers and small businesses including investment, insurance and trust services in 39 states and D.C., and mortgage and home equity loans in all 50 states and D.C.
Community Banking’s net income decreased 14%27% to $1.8$2.0 billion in secondthird quarter 2010 from $2.1$2.7 billion a year ago. Revenue decreased to $13.7$13.6 billion and $27.8$41.4 billion in the secondthird quarter and first halfnine months of 2010, respectively, from $15.2$15.6 billion and $29.6$45.2 billion for the same periods a year ago. Net interest income decreased $840$977 million, or 9%11%, in secondthird quarter 2010 from a year ago driven by the planned reduction in certain liquidating loan portfolios. Average loans decreased $26.7$26.2 billion, or 5%, in secondthird quarter 2010 from a year ago, due to the run-off of liquidating loan portfolios and continued low demand. Average core deposits decreased $32.2$14.5 billion in secondthird quarter 2010 from a year ago, primarily due to

13


$57 billion of higher cost Wachovia CDs maturing, partially offset by $31 billion of largely lower-cost CDs retained, and growth in customer deposits.high yield savings certificates maturing. Noninterest income decreased $671$986 million, or 11%15%, driven primarily by lower mortgage banking income.income and lower deposit service charges due to changes to Regulation E and related overdraft policy changes. The provision for loan losses decreased $946 million,$1.5 billion, or 22%32%, due to lower net charge-offs and a $389$400 million credit reserve release (net charge-offs less provision for credit losses) in secondthird quarter 2010 compared with a $479$265 million credit reserve build a year ago. Noninterest expense decreased $211increased $322 million, or 3%5%, due primarily to the FDIC special assessment in second quarter 2009higher personnel expense, higher foreclosed assets and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) assessments, partially offset by Wachovia merger-related cost savings.

13


Wholesale Bankingprovides financial solutions to businesses across the United States with annual sales generally in excess of $10 million and financial institutions globally. Products include middle market banking, corporate banking, commercial real estate, treasury management, asset-based lending, insurance brokerage, foreign exchange, correspondent banking, trade services, specialized lending, equipment finance, corporate trust, investment banking, capital markets, and asset management.
Wholesale Banking’s net income of $1.4 billion in secondthird quarter 2010 was up 32%143% from second$594 million in third quarter 2009. Net income increased to $2.6$4.1 billion for the first halfnine months of 2010 from $2.2$2.8 billion a year ago. Wholesale banking results for second quarter 2010 included $495 million in commercial PCI loan resolutions, substantially all of which was recognized in net interest income, due to success in selling or settling commercial PCI loans. Net interest income of $3.0$2.9 billion in secondthird quarter 2010 increased 21%14% from $2.5 billion a year ago due to the commercial PCI loanloans and security resolutions partially offset by lower average loans. Average loans of $223.4$222.5 billion declined 14%10% from secondthird quarter 2009 driven by declines across most lending areas. Average core deposits of $161.5$172.2 billion in secondthird quarter 2010 increased 18%17% from $137.4$146.8 billion a year ago driven by growth in both interest-bearing and non-interest bearing deposits primarily in global financial institutions, government and institutional banking, corporate trust, global financial institutions, sales and trading and commercial banking.mortgage servicing. The provision for creditloan losses declined $112decreased to $270 million in third quarter 2010 from second quarter 2009. The decrease included$1.4 billion a $111year ago, due to lower net charge-offs and a $250 million reserve release (net charge-offs less provision for credit losses) in the secondthird quarter 2010 compared with a $162$627 million credit reserve build a year ago. Noninterest income was $2.4 billion in third quarter 2010 flat with third quarter of 2009. Third quarter 2010 results included lower capital markets trading and investment banking revenue, mostly offset by higher PCI related resolutions. Noninterest expense of $2.7 billion in second quarter 2010 decreased 4% from $2.8 billion a year ago. The decline was driven primarily by lower capital markets related trading results as well as lower investment banking revenues. Noninterest expense of $2.8 billion in secondthird quarter 2010 increased 1%2% from a year ago asdue to higher legal and foreclosed asset expenses were partially offset by lowerand personnel expense and FDIC assessments.expenses.
Wealth, Brokerage and Retirementprovides a full range of financial advisory services to clients using a planning approach to meet each client’s needs. Wealth Management provides affluent and high net worth clients with a complete range of wealth management solutions including financial planning, private banking, credit, investment management and trust. Family Wealth meets the unique needs of the ultra high net worth customers. Retail brokerage’s financial advisors serveBrokerage serves customers’ advisory, brokerage and financial needs as part of one of the largest full-service brokerage firms in the U.S.United States. Retirement is a national leader in providing institutional retirement and trust services (including 401(k) and pension plan record keeping) for businesses, retail retirement solutions for individuals, and reinsurance services for the life insurance industry.
Wealth, Brokerage and Retirement’s net income increased 5%131% to $270$256 million in secondthird quarter 2010 from $258$111 million a year ago. Net income increased to $552$808 million in the first halfnine months of 2010, up from $434$545 million a year ago. Revenue increased to $2.9 billion and $5.8$8.7 billion in the secondthird quarter and first halfnine months of 2010, respectively, from $2.8 billion and $5.3$8.1 billion a year ago. Net interest income increased 7%18% to $684$683 million from $637$580 million a year ago, predominantly due to higher corporate investment allocation. Average loans decreased 7% to $42.6 billion in second quarter 2010 from $46.0 billion a year ago.earning assets. The provision for credit losses decreased $30$156 million to $81$77 million in secondthird quarter 2010 from $111$233 million a year ago, primarily due to secondlargely reflecting a credit reserve build in the third quarter 2009 reserve build.of last year. Noninterest expense

14


income increased $50$41 million, or 2%, as higher asset-based fees were partially offset by lower securities gains in the brokerage business. Noninterest expense increased $87 million, or 4%, to $2.4 billion in secondthird quarter 2010 from $2.3 billion a year ago predominantly due to higher broker commissions on increased production.
BALANCE SHEET ANALYSIS
During secondthird quarter 2010, our total assets, loans and core deposits each decreased slightly from December 31, 2009, but the strength of our business model continued to produce high rates of internal capital generation as reflected in our improved capital ratios. As a percentage of total risk-weighted assets, Tier 1 capital increased to 10.5%10.9%, total capital to 14.5%14.9%, Tier 1 leverage to 8.7%9.0% and Tier 1 common equity to 7.6%8.0% at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, up from 9.3%, 13.3%, 7.9% and 6.5%, respectively, at

14


December 31, 2009. The Company purchased $540 millionOn average, core deposits funded 102% of warrants from the U.S. Treasury during second quarter 2010, which reduced the Tier 1 common ratio by approximately 5 basis points. The loan portfolio is now predominantly funded with core depositsin third quarter 2010, and we have significant capacity to add higher yielding long-term mortgage-backed securities (MBS) for future revenue and earnings growth.
The following sections providediscussion provides additional information about the major components of our balance sheet. Capital is discussed in the “Capital Management” section of this Report.
SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE
                                                
 
 June 30, 2010 December 31, 2009  Sept. 30, 2010 December 31, 2009 
 Net Net    Net Net   
 unrealized Fair unrealized Fair  unrealized Fair unrealized Fair 
(in billions) Cost gain value Cost gain value  Cost gain value Cost gain value 
   
Debt securities available for sale $144.8 8.0 152.8 162.3 4.8 167.1  $163.1 8.5 171.6 162.3 4.8 167.1 
Marketable equity securities 4.5 0.6 5.1 4.8 0.8 5.6  4.4 0.9 5.3 4.8 0.8 5.6 
   
Total securities available for sale $149.3 8.6 157.9 167.1 5.6 172.7  $167.5 9.4 176.9 167.1 5.6 172.7 
   
 
Securities available for sale consist of both debt and marketable equity securities. We hold debt securities available for sale primarily for liquidity, interest rate risk management and long-term yield enhancement. Accordingly, this portfolio consists primarily of very liquid, high-quality federal agency debt and privately issued MBS. The total net unrealized gains on securities available for sale of $8.6$9.4 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, were up from $5.6 billion at December 31, 2009, due to a general decline in long-term yields and narrowing of credit spreads.
Comparative detail of average balances of securities available for sale is provided in the table under “Earnings Performance — Net Interest Income” earlier in this Report.
We analyze securities for other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) on a quarterly basis, or more often if a potential loss-triggering event occurs. The initial indication of OTTI for both debt and equity securities is a decline in the market value below the amount recorded for an investment, and the severity and duration of the decline. In determining whether an impairment is other than temporary, we consider the length of time and the extent to which the market value has been below cost, recent events specific to the issuer, including investment downgrades by rating agencies and economic conditions within its industry, and whether it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before a recovery in value.
At JuneSeptember 30, 2010, we had approximately $6 billion of investments in securities, primarily municipal bonds, which are guaranteed against loss by bond insurers. These securities are predominantly investment grade and were generally underwritten in accordance with our own investment standards prior to the determination to purchase, without relying on the bond insurer’s guarantee in making the investment

15


decision. These securities will continue to be monitored as part of our on-going impairment analysis of our securities available for sale, but are expected to perform, even if the rating agencies reduce the credit rating of the bond insurers.
The weighted-average expected maturity of debt securities available for sale was 5.0 years at JuneSeptember 30, 2010. Since 69%68% of this portfolio is MBS, the expected remaining maturity may differ from contractual maturity because borrowers generally have the right to prepay obligations before the underlying mortgages mature. The estimated effect of a 200 basis point increase or decrease in interest rates on the fair value and the expected remaining maturity of the MBS available for sale are shown in the following table.

15


MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES — INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
                        
 
 Expected  Expected 
 remaining  remaining 
 Fair Net unrealized maturity  Fair Net unrealized maturity 
(in billions) value gains (losses) (in years)  value gains (losses) (in years) 
   
At June 30, 2010 $105.1 6.2 3.7 
At June 30, 2010, assuming a 200 basis point: 
At September 30, 2010 $117.4 6.1 3.5 
At September 30, 2010, assuming a 200 basis point: 
Increase in interest rates 97.3  (1.6) 5.6  107.8  (3.5) 4.9 
Decrease in interest rates 109.3 10.4 2.9  122.6 11.3 2.8 
   
See Note 4 (Securities Available for Sale) to Financial Statements in this Report for securities available for sale by security type.
LOAN PORTFOLIO
                         
  
  June 30, 2010  December 31, 2009 
      All          All    
  PCI  other      PCI  other    
(in millions) loans  loans  Total  loans  loans  Total 
  
Commercial and commercial real estate:                        
Commercial $1,113   144,971   146,084   1,911   156,441   158,352 
Real estate mortgage  3,487   96,139   99,626   4,137   93,390   97,527 
Real estate construction  4,194   26,685   30,879   5,207   31,771   36,978 
Lease financing     13,492   13,492      14,210   14,210 
  
Total commercial and commercial real estate  8,794   281,287   290,081   11,255   295,812   307,067 
  
Consumer:                        
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage  35,972   197,840   233,812   38,386   191,150   229,536 
Real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage  290   101,037   101,327   331   103,377   103,708 
Credit card     22,086   22,086      24,003   24,003 
Other revolving credit and installment     88,485   88,485      89,058   89,058 
  
Total consumer  36,262   409,448   445,710   38,717   407,588   446,305 
  
Foreign  1,457   29,017   30,474   1,733   27,665   29,398 
  
Total loans $46,513   719,752   766,265   51,705   731,065   782,770 
  
  
         
 
  Sept. 30, Dec. 31,
(in millions) 2010  2009 
  
Commercial and commercial real estate $286,980  $307,067 
Consumer  436,993   446,305 
Foreign  29,691   29,398 
  
Total loans $753,664   782,770 
  
  
A discussion of average loan balances and a comparative detail of average loan balances is included in “Earnings Performance — Net Interest Income” earlier in this Report; period-end balances and other loan related information are in Note 5 (Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report.
DEPOSITS
Deposits totaled $814.5 billion at September 30, 2010, compared with $824.0 billion at December 31, 2009. Comparative detail of average deposit balances is provided in the table under “Earnings Performance — Net Interest Income” earlier in this Report. Total core deposits were $771.8 billion at September 30, 2010, down from $780.7 billion at December 31, 2009.
             
 
  Sept. 30, Dec. 31,   
(in millions) 2010  2009  % Change 
  
Noninterest-bearing $184,418   181,356   2%
Interest-bearing checking  59,944   63,225   (5)
Market rate and other savings  415,706   402,448   3 
Savings certificates  81,448   100,857   (19)
Foreign deposits (1)  30,276   32,851   (8)
  
Core deposits  771,792   780,737   (1)
Other time and savings deposits  19,831   16,142   23 
Other foreign deposits  22,889   27,139   (16)
  
Total deposits $814,512   824,018   (1)
  
  
(1)Reflects Eurodollar sweep balances included in core deposits.

16


OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
In the ordinary course of business, we engage in financial transactions that are not recorded in the balance sheet, or may be recorded in the balance sheet in amounts that are different from the full contract or notional amount of the transaction. These transactions are designed to (1) meet the financial needs of customers, (2) manage our credit, market or liquidity risks, (3) diversify our funding sources, and/or (4) optimize capital.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET TRANSACTIONS WITH UNCONSOLIDATED ENTITIES
In the normal course of business, we enter into various types of on- and off-balance sheet transactions with special purpose entities (SPEs), which are corporations, trusts or partnerships that are established for a limited purpose. Historically, the majority of SPEs were formed in connection with securitization transactions. For more information on securitizations, including sales proceeds and cash flows from securitizations, see Note 7 (Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities) to Financial Statements in this Report.
NEWLY CONSOLIDATED VIE ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
Effective January 1, 2010, we adopted new consolidation accounting guidance and, accordingly, consolidated certain VIEs that were not included in our consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2009. On January 1, 2010, we recorded the assets and liabilities of the newly consolidated variable interest entities (VIEs) and derecognized our existing interests in those VIEs. We also recorded a $183 million increase to beginning retained earnings as a cumulative effect adjustment and recorded a $173 million increase to other comprehensive income (OCI).
The following table presents the net incremental assets recorded on our balance sheet by structure type upon adoption of new consolidation accounting guidance.
     
 
  Incremental 
  assets as of 
(in millions) Jan. 1, 2010 
  
Structure type:
    
Residential mortgage loans — nonconforming (1) $11,479 
Commercial paper conduit  5,088 
Other  2,002 
  
Total $18,569 
  
  
(1)Represents certain of our residential mortgage loans that are not guaranteed by GSEs (“nonconforming”).
In accordance with the transition provisions of the new consolidation accounting guidance, we initially recorded newly consolidated VIE assets and liabilities at a basis consistent with our accounting for respective assets at their amortized cost basis, except for those VIEs for which the fair value option was elected. The carrying amount for loans approximate the outstanding unpaid principal balance, adjusted for allowance for loan losses. Short-term borrowings and long-term debt approximate the outstanding par amount due to creditors.
Upon adoption of new consolidation accounting guidance on January 1, 2010, we elected fair value option accounting for certain nonconforming residential mortgage loan securitization VIEs. This election requires us to recognize the VIE’s eligible assets and liabilities on the balance sheet at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings. Such eligible assets and liabilities consisted primarily of loans and long-term debt, respectively. The fair value option was elected for those newly consolidated

17


VIEs for which our interests, prior to January 1, 2010, were predominantly carried at fair value with changes in fair value recorded to earnings. Accordingly, the fair value option was elected to effectively continue fair value accounting through earnings for those interests. Conversely, fair value option was not elected for those newly consolidated VIEs that did not share these characteristics. At January 1, 2010, the fair value of loans and long-term debt for which the fair value option was elected was $1.0 billion and $1.0 billion, respectively. The incremental impact of electing fair value option (compared to not electing) on the cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings was an increase of $15 million.
RISK MANAGEMENT
All financial institutions must manage and control a variety of business risks that can significantly affect their financial performance. Key among these are credit, asset/liability and market risk.
For further discussion about how we manage these risks, see pages 54-71 of our 2009 Form 10-K. The discussion that follows is intended to provide an update on these risks.
CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT
Our credit risk management process is governed centrally, but provides for decentralized credit management and accountability by our lines of business. Our overall credit process includes comprehensive credit policies, judgmental or statistical credit underwriting, frequent and detailed risk measurement and modeling, extensive credit training programs, and a continual loan review and audit process. In addition, regulatory examiners review and perform detailed tests of our credit underwriting, loan administration and allowance processes. For more information on our credit risk management process, please refer to page 54 in our 2009 Form 10-K.
Credit Quality Overview
Credit losses declined in third quarter 2010, which continued to support our belief that quarterly credit loss levels peaked in 2009. The continued improvement in credit performance is a result of a slowly improving economy coupled with actions we have taken over the past several years to improve underwriting standards, mitigate losses and exit portfolios with unattractive credit metrics.
Quarterly credit losses declined 9% to $4.1 billion in third quarter 2010 from $4.5 billion in second quarter 2010 and declined 20% from third quarter 2009. This improvement in losses was broad based across most of the consumer portfolios, with reduced losses in the home equity, private student lending, Wells Fargo Financial, Pick-a-Pay, wealth management and credit card portfolios.
Losses in the commercial portfolio continued to improve from the higher levels experienced last year, including a 17% linked-quarter reduction in CRE losses.
Our PCI loan portfolio continued to perform better than originally expected. In third quarter 2010 $639 million of nonaccretable difference was reclassified to accretable yield and is expected to accrete to future income over the remaining life of the underlying loans. In addition, $202 million of nonaccretable difference was released into income for commercial loans that were paid off or sold.
Based on declining losses and improved credit quality trends, the provision for credit losses of $3.4 billion was $650 million less than net charge-offs in third quarter 2010. Absent significant deterioration in the economy, we currently expect future reductions in the allowance for loan losses.
Measuring and monitoring our credit risk is an ongoing process that tracks delinquencies, collateral values, economic trends by geographic areas, loan-level risk grading for certain portfolios (typically commercial) and other indications of risk to loss. Our credit risk monitoring process is designed to enable early identification of developing risk to loss and to support our determination of an adequate allowance for loan losses. During the current economic cycle our monitoring and resolution efforts have focused on

18


loan portfolios exhibiting the highest levels of risk including mortgage loans supported by real estate (both consumer and commercial), junior lien, commercial, credit card and subprime portfolios. The following sections include additional information regarding each of these loan portfolios and their relevant concentrations and credit quality performance metrics.
The following table identifies our non-strategic and liquidating loan portfolios.
NON-STRATEGIC AND LIQUIDATING LOAN PORTFOLIOS
         
 
  Outstanding balances 
  Sept. 30, Dec. 31,
(in billions) 2010  2009 
  
Commercial and commercial real estate PCI loans (1) $7.7   11.3 
Pick-a-Pay mortgage (1)  77.3   85.2 
Liquidating home equity  7.3   8.4 
Legacy Wells Fargo Financial indirect auto  7.1   11.3 
Legacy Wells Fargo Financial debt consolidation (2)  19.7   22.4 
  
Total non-strategic and liquidating loan portfolios $119.1   138.6 
  
  
(1)Net of purchase accounting adjustments related to PCI loans.
(2)In July 2010, we announced the restructuring of our Wells Fargo Financial division and exiting the origination of non-prime portfolio mortgage loans.
Commercial Real Estate (CRE)
The CRE portfolio consists of both CRE mortgages and CRE construction loans. The combined CRE loans outstanding totaled $126.7 billion at September 30, 2010, or 17% of total loans. CRE construction loans totaled $27.9 billion at September 30, 2010, or 4% of total loans. CRE mortgage loans totaled $98.8 billion at September 30, 2010, or 13% of total loans. The portfolio is diversified both geographically and by property type. The largest geographic concentrations are found in California and Florida, which represented 22% and 11% of the total CRE portfolio, respectively. By property type, the largest concentrations are office buildings at 23% and industrial/warehouse at 11% of the portfolio.
The underwriting of CRE loans primarily focuses on cash flows and creditworthiness, and not solely collateral valuations. To identify and manage newly emerging problem CRE loans, we employ a high level of surveillance and regular customer interaction to understand and manage the risks associated with these assets, including regular loan reviews and appraisal updates. As issues are identified, management is engaged and dedicated workout groups are in place to manage problem assets. At September 30, 2010, the recorded investment in PCI CRE loans totaled $6.7 billion, down from $12.3 billion since the Wachovia acquisition at December 31, 2008, reflecting the reduction resulting from loan resolutions and write-downs.
The following table summarizes CRE loans by state and property type with the related nonaccrual totals. At September 30, 2010, the highest concentration of total loans by state was $28.4 billion in California, more than double the next largest state concentration, and the related nonaccrual loans totaled about $1.7 billion, or 6% of CRE loans in California. Office buildings, at $29.6 billion, were the largest property type concentration, more than double the next largest, and the related nonaccrual loans totaled $1.4 billion, or 5% of total CRE loans for office buildings. Of CRE mortgage loans (excluding CRE construction loans), 41% related to owner-occupied properties at September 30, 2010. Nonaccrual loans totaled 7% of the non-PCI outstanding balance at September 30, 2010.

19


CRE LOANS BY STATE AND PROPERTY TYPE
                             
 
  September 30, 2010 
  Real estate mortgage  Real estate construction  Total  % of 
  Nonaccrual  Outstanding  Nonaccrual  Outstanding  Nonaccrual  Outstanding  total 
(in millions) loans  balance (1)  loans  balance (1)  loans  balance (1)  loans 
  
By state:
                            
PCI loans:
                            
Florida
 $   471      720      1,191   *%
California
     625      228      853   * 
North Carolina
     187      416      603   * 
Georgia
     227      323      550   * 
New York
     288      268      556   * 
Other
     1,320      1,594      2,914(2)  * 
  
Total PCI loans
     3,118      3,549      6,667   1 
  
All other loans:
                            
California
  1,174   23,561   508   3,981   1,682   27,542   4 
Florida
  921   9,899   398   2,374   1,319   12,273   2 
Texas
  319   6,578   306   2,573   625   9,151   1 
North Carolina
  321   4,728   302   1,612   623   6,340   * 
Georgia
  325   3,612   162   1,011   487   4,623   * 
Virginia
  66   3,779   163   1,634   229   5,413   * 
Arizona
  234   3,390   221   794   455   4,184   * 
New York
  49   3,471   41   1,139   90   4,610   * 
New Jersey
  111   2,684   47   668   158   3,352   * 
Colorado
  96   2,865   89   730   185   3,595   * 
Other
  1,463   31,070   961   7,846   2,424   38,916(3)  5 
  
Total all other loans
  5,079   95,637   3,198   24,362   8,277   119,999   16 
  
Total
 $5,079   98,755   3,198   27,911   8,277   126,666   17%
  
By property:
                            
PCI loans:
                            
Apartments
 $   585      915      1,500   *%
Office buildings
     1,093      352      1,445   * 
1-4 family land
     238      728      966   * 
Retail (excluding shopping center)
     430      103      533   * 
Land (excluding 1-4 family)
     24      443      467   * 
Other
     748      1,008      1,756   * 
  
Total PCI loans
     3,118      3,549      6,667   1 
  
All other loans:
                            
Office buildings
  1,138   25,126   269   3,002   1,407   28,128   4 
Industrial/warehouse
  730   13,026   87   1,116   817   14,142   2 
Real estate — other
  657   13,181   103   896   760   14,077   2 
Apartments
  328   7,989   424   4,242   752   12,231   2 
Retail (excluding shopping center)
  617   9,708   137   935   754   10,643   1 
Land (excluding 1-4 family)
  18   491   712   7,227   730   7,718   1 
Shopping center
  338   6,483   264   1,772   602   8,255   1 
Hotel/motel
  509   5,658   84   874   593   6,532   * 
1-4 family land
  162   357   641   2,447   803   2,804   * 
Institutional
  100   2,704   9   253   109   2,957   * 
Other
  482   10,914   468   1,598   950   12,512   2 
  
Total all other loans
  5,079   95,637   3,198   24,362   8,277   119,999   16 
  
Total
 $5,079   98,755(4)  3,198   27,911   8,277   126,666   17%
  
  
*Less than 1%
(1)For PCI loans amounts represent carrying value.
(2)Includes 35 states; no state had loans in excess of $526 million.
(3)Includes 40 states; no state had loans in excess of $3.0 billion.
(4)Includes $40.7 billion of loans to owner-occupants where 51% or more of the property is used in the conduct of their business.
(continued on following page)

20


(continued from previous page)
                             
 
  December 31, 2009 
  Real estate mortgage  Real estate construction  Total  % of 
  Nonaccrual  Outstanding  Nonaccrual  Outstanding  Nonaccrual  Outstanding  total 
(in millions) loans  balance (1)  loans  balance (1)  loans  balance (1)  loans 
  
By state:                            
PCI loans:
                            
Florida $   629      1,115      1,744   *%
California     995      271      1,266   * 
North Carolina     150      618      768   * 
Georgia     226      523      749   * 
Virginia     219      480      699   * 
Other     1,918      2,200      4,118(5)  * 
  
Total PCI loans     4,137      5,207      9,344   1 
  
All other loans:
                            
California  1,132   22,739   874   5,024   2,006   27,763   4 
Florida  563   9,899   374   3,227   937   13,126   2 
Texas  225   6,098   256   3,054   481   9,152   1 
North Carolina  179   4,983   161   2,079   340   7,062   * 
Georgia  207   3,809   127   1,507   334   5,316   * 
Virginia  53   3,080   117   1,974   170   5,054   * 
New York  53   3,591   49   1,456   102   5,047   * 
Arizona  158   3,810   200   1,193   358   5,003   * 
New Jersey  66   2,904   23   768   89   3,672   * 
Colorado  78   2,252   110   875   188   3,127   * 
Other  982   30,225   1,022   10,614   2,004   40,839(6)  5 
  
Total all other loans  3,696   93,390   3,313   31,771   7,009   125,161   16 
  
Total $3,696   97,527   3,313   36,978   7,009   134,505   17%
  
By property:                            
PCI loans:
                            
Apartments $   810      1,300      2,110   *%
Office buildings     1,443      399      1,842   * 
1-4 family land     270      1,076      1,346   * 
1-4 family structure     96      693      789   * 
Land (excluding 1-4 family)           759      759   * 
Other     1,518      980      2,498   * 
  
Total PCI loans     4,137      5,207      9,344   1 
  
All other loans:
                            
Office buildings  887   24,688   188   4,005   1,075   28,693   4 
Industrial/warehouse  508   13,643   36   1,281   544   14,924   2 
Real estate — other  550   13,563   102   1,105   652   14,668   2 
Apartments  267   7,102   254   5,138   521   12,240   2 
Retail (excluding shopping center)  597   10,457   108   1,327   705   11,784   2 
Land (excluding 1-4 family)  9   262   778   8,943   787   9,205   1 
Shopping center  204   5,912   210   2,398   414   8,310   1 
Hotel/motel  208   5,216   123   1,160   331   6,376   * 
1-4 family land  77   232   764   3,156   841   3,388   * 
1-4 family structure  60   1,065   689   2,199   749   3,264   * 
Other  329   11,250   61   1,059   390   12,309   2 
  
Total all other loans  3,696   93,390   3,313   31,771   7,009   125,161   16 
  
Total $3,696   97,527(7)  3,313   36,978   7,009   134,505   17%
  
  
(5)Includes 38 states; no state had loans in excess of $605 million.
(6)Includes 40 states; no state had loans in excess of $3.0 billion.
(7)Includes $42.1 billion of loans to owner-occupants where 51% or more of the property is used in the conduct of their business.

21


Commercial Loans and Lease Financing
For purposes of portfolio risk management, we aggregate commercial loans and lease financing according to market segmentation and standard industry codes. The following table summarizes commercial loans and lease financing by industry with the related nonaccrual totals. While this portfolio has experienced deterioration in the current credit cycle, we believe this portfolio has experienced less credit deterioration than our CRE portfolios as evidenced by its (1) lower percentage of loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing, (2) lower percentage of nonperforming loans to total loans outstanding at September 30, 2010, as well as (3) the lower year-to-date loss rate to the year-to-date average of total loans of 0.14%, 2.65% and 1.18% compared with 0.63%, 6.53% and 1.34%, respectively, for the CRE portfolios. We believe this portfolio is well underwritten and is diverse in its risk with relatively similar concentrations across several industries. A majority of our commercial loans and lease financing portfolio is secured by short-term assets, such as accounts receivable, inventory and securities, as well as long-lived assets, such as equipment and other business assets. Our credit risk management process for this portfolio primarily focuses on a customer’s ability to repay the loan through their cash flow. Generally, collateral securing this portfolio represents a secondary source of repayment.
COMMERCIAL LOANS AND LEASE FINANCING BY INDUSTRY
                         
 
  September 30, 2010  December 31, 2009 
          % of          % of 
  Nonaccrual  Outstanding  total  Nonaccrual  Outstanding  total 
(in millions) loans  balance (1)  loans  loans  balance (1)  loans 
  
PCI loans:
                        
Investors $   249   *% $   140   *%
Media     180   *      314   * 
Insurance     99   *      118   * 
Technology     67   *      72   * 
Leisure     52   *      110   * 
Healthcare     44   *      51   * 
Other     296(2)  *      1,106(2)  * 
  
Total PCI loans     987   *      1,911   * 
  
All other loans:
                        
Financial institutions  202   9,739   1   496   11,111   1 
Cyclical retailers  71   8,738   1   71   8,188   1 
Healthcare  106   7,665   1   88   8,397   1 
Food and beverage  97   8,085   1   77   8,316   1 
Oil and gas  181   7,560   1   202   8,464   1 
Industrial equipment  137   6,301   *   119   7,524   * 
Business services  132   5,377   *   99   6,722   * 
Transportation  50   6,151   *   31   6,469   * 
Utilities  194   5,011   *   15   5,752   * 
Real estate other  116   5,735   *   167   6,570   * 
Technology  43   5,738   *   72   5,489   * 
Investors  166   5,029   *   196   5,347   * 
Other  2,746   78,198(3)  10   2,935   82,302(3)  11 
  
Total all other loans  4,241   159,327   21   4,568   170,651   22 
  
Total $4,241   160,314   21% $4,568   172,562   22%
  
  
*Less than 1%
(1)For PCI loans amounts represent carrying value.
(2)No other single category had loans in excess of $44 million at September 30, 2010, or $122 million (residential construction) at December 31, 2009.
(3)No other single category had loans in excess of $4.4 billion at September 30, 2010, or $5.8 billion (public administration) at December 31, 2009. The next largest categories included public administration, hotel/restaurant, securities firms, media and non-residential construction.
During the recent credit cycle, we have experienced an increase in requests for extensions of commercial, and commercial real estate and construction loans which have repayment guarantees. All extensions are granted based on a re-underwriting of the loan and our assessment of the borrower’s ability to perform under the agreed-upon terms. At the time of extension, borrowers are generally performing in accordance

22


with the contractual loan terms. Extension terms generally range from six to thirty-six months and may require that the borrower provide additional economic support in the form of partial repayment, amortization or additional collateral or guarantees. In cases where the value of collateral or financial condition of the borrower is insufficient to repay our loan, we may rely upon the support of an outside repayment guarantee in providing the extensions. In considering the impairment status of the loan, we evaluate the collateral and future cash flows as well as the anticipated support of any repayment guarantor. When performance under a loan is not reasonably assured, including the performance of the guarantor, we charge-off all or a portion of a loan based on the fair value of the collateral securing the loan.
Our ability to seek performance under the guarantee is directly related to the guarantor’s creditworthiness, capacity and willingness to perform. We evaluate a guarantor’s capacity and willingness to perform on an annual basis, or more frequently as warranted. Our evaluation is based on the most current financial information available and is focused on various key financial metrics, including net worth, leverage, and current and future liquidity. We consider the guarantor’s reputation, creditworthiness, and willingness to work with us based on our analysis as well as other lenders’ experience with the guarantor. Our assessment of the guarantor’s credit strength is reflected in our loan risk ratings for such loans. The loan risk rating is an important factor in our allowance methodology for commercial and commercial real estate loans.
Purchased Credit-Impaired (PCI) Loans
As of December 31, 2008, certain of the loans acquired from Wachovia had evidence of credit deterioration since their origination, and it was probable that we would not collect all contractually required principal and interest payments. Such loans identified at the time of the acquisition were accounted for using the measurement provisions for PCI loans. PCI loans were recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition, and any related allowance for loan losses was not permitted to be carried over.
PCI loans were written down to an amount estimated to be collectible. Accordingly, such loans are not classified as nonaccrual, even though they may be contractually past due, because we expect to fully collect the new carrying values of such loans (that is, the new cost basis arising out of our purchase accounting).
A nonaccretable difference was established in purchase accounting for PCI loans to absorb losses expected at that time on those loans. Amounts absorbed by the nonaccretable difference do not affect the income statement or the allowance for credit losses. Substantially all of our commercial, CRE and foreign PCI loans are accounted for as individual loans. Conversely, Pick-a-Pay and other consumer PCI loans have been aggregated into several pools based on common risk characteristics. Each pool is accounted for as a single asset with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows. Resolutions of loans may include sales of loans to third parties, receipt of payments in settlement with the borrower, or foreclosure of the collateral. Our policy is to remove an individual loan from a pool based on comparing the amount received from its resolution with its contractual amount. Any difference between these amounts is absorbed by the nonaccretable difference. This removal method assumes that the amount received from resolution approximates pool performance expectations. The remaining accretable yield balance is unaffected and any material change in remaining effective yield caused by this removal method is addressed by our quarterly cash flow evaluation process for each pool. For loans in pools that are resolved by payment in full, there is no release of the nonaccretable difference since there is no difference between the amount received at resolution and the contractual amount of the loan. Modified PCI loans should not be removed from a pool even if those loans would otherwise be deemed troubled debt restructurings (TDRs). In second quarterthe first nine months of 2010, we recognized in income $506$890 million of nonaccretable difference related to commercial PCI loans due to payoffs and dispositions of these loans, compared with $182 million in first quarter 2010.loans. We also transferred $1.9$3.2 billion from the nonaccretable difference to the accretable yield, of

23


which $1.8$2.4 billion was due to sustained positive performance in the Pick-a-Pay portfolio. Theportfolio evidenced through an increase in the accretable yield for the Pick-a-Pay portfolio had no impact on second quarter 2010 net income and is expected to be recognized as a yield adjustment to income over the remaining life of the loans, which is estimated to have a weighted-average life of eight years.

17


cash flows. The following table provides an analysis of changes in the nonaccretable difference related to principal that is not expected to be collected for the second quarter and first half of 2010.collected.
CHANGES IN NONACCRETABLE DIFFERENCE FOR PCI LOANSOFF-BALANCE SHEET TRANSACTIONS WITH UNCONSOLIDATED ENTITIES
                 
  
  Commercial          
  CRE and      Other    
(in millions) foreign  Pick-a-Pay  consumer  Total 
  
Balance, December 31, 2008 $10,410   26,485   4,069   40,964 
Release of nonaccretable difference due to:                
Loans resolved by settlement with borrower (1)  (330)        (330)
Loans resolved by sales to third parties (2)  (86)     (85)  (171)
Reclassification to accretable yield for loans with improving cash flows (3)  (138)  (27)  (276)  (441)
Use of nonaccretable difference due to:                
Losses from loan resolutions and write-downs (4)  (4,853)  (10,218)  (2,086)  (17,157)
  
Balance, December 31, 2009
  5,003   16,240   1,622   22,865 
Release of nonaccretable difference due to:
                
Loans resolved by settlement with borrower (1)
  (586)        (586)
Loans resolved by sales to third parties (2)
  (102)        (102)
Reclassification to accretable yield for loans with improving cash flows (3)
  (169)  (2,356)  (70)  (2,595)
Use of nonaccretable difference due to:
                
Losses from loan resolutions and write-downs (4)
  (1,223)  (1,892)  (263)  (3,378)
  
Balance, June 30, 2010
 $2,923   11,992   1,289   16,204 
  
                 
  
Balance, March 31, 2010
 $4,001   14,514   1,412   19,927 
Release of nonaccretable difference due to:
                
Loans resolved by settlement with borrower (1)
  (440)        (440)
Loans resolved by sales to third parties (2)
  (66)        (66)
Reclassification to accretable yield for loans with improving cash flows (3)
  (77)  (1,807)  (43)  (1,927)
Use of nonaccretable difference due to:
                
Losses from loan resolutions and write-downs (4)
  (495)  (715)  (80)  (1,290)
  
Balance, June 30, 2010
 $2,923   11,992   1,289   16,204 
  
  
In the normal course of business, we enter into various types of on- and off-balance sheet transactions with special purpose entities (SPEs), which are corporations, trusts or partnerships that are established for a limited purpose. Historically, the majority of SPEs were formed in connection with securitization transactions. For more information on securitizations, including sales proceeds and cash flows from securitizations, see Note 7 (Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities) to Financial Statements in this Report.
NEWLY CONSOLIDATED VIE ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
Effective January 1, 2010, we adopted new consolidation accounting guidance and, accordingly, consolidated certain VIEs that were not included in our consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2009. On January 1, 2010, we recorded the assets and liabilities of the newly consolidated variable interest entities (VIEs) and derecognized our existing interests in those VIEs. We also recorded a $183 million increase to beginning retained earnings as a cumulative effect adjustment and recorded a $173 million increase to other comprehensive income (OCI).
The following table presents the net incremental assets recorded on our balance sheet by structure type upon adoption of new consolidation accounting guidance.
     
 
  Incremental 
  assets as of 
(in millions) Jan. 1, 2010 
  
Structure type:
    
Residential mortgage loans — nonconforming (1) $11,479 
Commercial paper conduit  5,088 
Other  2,002 
  
Total $18,569 
  
  
(1) ReleaseRepresents certain of our residential mortgage loans that are not guaranteed by GSEs (“nonconforming”).
In accordance with the transition provisions of the new consolidation accounting guidance, we initially recorded newly consolidated VIE assets and liabilities at a basis consistent with our accounting for respective assets at their amortized cost basis, except for those VIEs for which the fair value option was elected. The carrying amount for loans approximate the outstanding unpaid principal balance, adjusted for allowance for loan losses. Short-term borrowings and long-term debt approximate the outstanding par amount due to creditors.
Upon adoption of new consolidation accounting guidance on January 1, 2010, we elected fair value option accounting for certain nonconforming residential mortgage loan securitization VIEs. This election requires us to recognize the VIE’s eligible assets and liabilities on the balance sheet at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings. Such eligible assets and liabilities consisted primarily of loans and long-term debt, respectively. The fair value option was elected for those newly consolidated

17


VIEs for which our interests, prior to January 1, 2010, were predominantly carried at fair value with changes in fair value recorded to earnings. Accordingly, the fair value option was elected to effectively continue fair value accounting through earnings for those interests. Conversely, fair value option was not elected for those newly consolidated VIEs that did not share these characteristics. At January 1, 2010, the fair value of loans and long-term debt for which the fair value option was elected was $1.0 billion and $1.0 billion, respectively. The incremental impact of electing fair value option (compared to not electing) on the cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings was an increase of $15 million.
RISK MANAGEMENT
All financial institutions must manage and control a variety of business risks that can significantly affect their financial performance. Key among these are credit, asset/liability and market risk.
For further discussion about how we manage these risks, see pages 54-71 of our 2009 Form 10-K. The discussion that follows is intended to provide an update on these risks.
CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT
Our credit risk management process is governed centrally, but provides for decentralized credit management and accountability by our lines of business. Our overall credit process includes comprehensive credit policies, judgmental or statistical credit underwriting, frequent and detailed risk measurement and modeling, extensive credit training programs, and a continual loan review and audit process. In addition, regulatory examiners review and perform detailed tests of our credit underwriting, loan administration and allowance processes. For more information on our credit risk management process, please refer to page 54 in our 2009 Form 10-K.
Credit Quality Overview
Credit losses declined in third quarter 2010, which continued to support our belief that quarterly credit loss levels peaked in 2009. The continued improvement in credit performance is a result of a slowly improving economy coupled with actions we have taken over the past several years to improve underwriting standards, mitigate losses and exit portfolios with unattractive credit metrics.
Quarterly credit losses declined 9% to $4.1 billion in third quarter 2010 from $4.5 billion in second quarter 2010 and declined 20% from third quarter 2009. This improvement in losses was broad based across most of the nonaccretable difference for settlementconsumer portfolios, with borrower, on individually accounted PCI loans, increases interest incomereduced losses in the period of settlement.home equity, private student lending, Wells Fargo Financial, Pick-a-Pay, wealth management and Other consumer PCI loans do not reflect nonaccretable difference releases due to pool accounting for those loans, which assumes that the amount received approximates the pool performance expectations.credit card portfolios.
(2) Release of the nonaccretable difference as a result of sales to third parties increases noninterest incomeLosses in the period ofcommercial portfolio continued to improve from the sale.higher levels experienced last year, including a 17% linked-quarter reduction in CRE losses.
(3) ReclassificationOur PCI loan portfolio continued to perform better than originally expected. In third quarter 2010 $639 million of nonaccretable difference for increased cash flow estimates to the accretable yield will result in increasing income and thus the rate of return realized. Amountswas reclassified to accretable yield areand is expected to be probable of realizationaccrete to future income over the estimated remaining life of the loan.underlying loans. In addition, $202 million of nonaccretable difference was released into income for commercial loans that were paid off or sold.
(4) Write-downs toBased on declining losses and improved credit quality trends, the provision for credit losses of $3.4 billion was $650 million less than net realizable value of PCI loans are charged tocharge-offs in third quarter 2010. Absent significant deterioration in the nonaccretable difference when severe delinquency (normally 180 days) or other indications of severe borrower financial stress exist that indicate there will be a loss of contractually due amounts upon final resolution ofeconomy, we currently expect future reductions in the loan.allowance for loan losses.
Measuring and monitoring our credit risk is an ongoing process that tracks delinquencies, collateral values, economic trends by geographic areas, loan-level risk grading for certain portfolios (typically commercial) and other indications of risk to loss. Our credit risk monitoring process is designed to enable early identification of developing risk to loss and to support our determination of an adequate allowance for loan losses. During the current economic cycle our monitoring and resolution efforts have focused on

18


Sinceloan portfolios exhibiting the Wachovia acquisition, we have released $4.2 billion in nonaccretable difference,highest levels of risk including $3.0 billion transferred from the nonaccretable difference to the accretable yieldmortgage loans supported by real estate (both consumer and $1.2 billion released throughcommercial), junior lien, commercial, credit card and subprime portfolios. The following sections include additional information regarding each of these loan resolutions. We provided $1.2 billion in the allowance forportfolios and their relevant concentrations and credit losses in excess of the initial expected levels on certain PCI loans; the net result is a $3.0 billion improvement in our initial projected losses on PCI loans. At June 30, 2010, the allowance for credit losses in excess of initial expected levels on certain PCI loans was $225 million. quality performance metrics.
The following table analyzes the actualidentifies our non-strategic and projected loss results on PCI loans since the acquisition of Wachovia on December 31, 2008, through June 30, 2010.liquidating loan portfolios.
                 
  
  Commercial          
  CRE and      Other    
(in millions) foreign  Pick-a-Pay  consumer  Total 
  
Release of unneeded nonaccretable difference due to:                
Loans resolved by settlement with borrower (1) $916         916 
Loans resolved by sales to third parties (2)  188      85   273 
Reclassification to accretable yield for loans with improving cash flows (3)  307   2,383   346   3,036 
  
Total releases of nonaccretable difference due to better than expected losses  1,411   2,383   431   4,225 
Provision for worse than originally expected losses (4)  (1,226)     (29)  (1,255)
  
Actual and projected losses on PCI loans better (worse) than originally expected $185   2,383   402   2,970 
  
NON-STRATEGIC AND LIQUIDATING LOAN PORTFOLIOS
         
 
  Outstanding balances 
  Sept. 30, Dec. 31,
(in billions) 2010  2009 
  
Commercial and commercial real estate PCI loans (1) $7.7   11.3 
Pick-a-Pay mortgage (1)  77.3   85.2 
Liquidating home equity  7.3   8.4 
Legacy Wells Fargo Financial indirect auto  7.1   11.3 
Legacy Wells Fargo Financial debt consolidation (2)  19.7   22.4 
  
Total non-strategic and liquidating loan portfolios $119.1   138.6 
  
  
(1) ReleaseNet of the nonaccretable difference for settlement with borrower, on individually accountedpurchase accounting adjustments related to PCI loans, increases interest income in the period of settlement. Pick-a-Pay and Other consumer PCI loans do not reflect nonaccretable difference releases due to pool accounting for those loans, which assumes that the amount received approximates the pool performance expectations.loans.
(2) ReleaseIn July 2010, we announced the restructuring of our Wells Fargo Financial division and exiting the nonaccretable difference as a resultorigination of sales to third parties increases noninterest income in the period of the sale.
(3)Reclassification of nonaccretable difference for increased cash flow estimates to the accretable yield will result in increasing income and thus the rate of return realized. Amounts reclassified to accretable yield are expected to be probable of realization over the estimated remaining life of the loan.
(4)Provision for additional losses recorded as a charge to income, when it is estimated that the expected cash flows for a PCI loan or pool of loans have decreased subsequent to the acquisition.non-prime portfolio mortgage loans.
For further information on PCICommercial Real Estate (CRE)
The CRE portfolio consists of both CRE mortgages and CRE construction loans. The combined CRE loans see Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — Loans) to Financial Statements in the 2009 Form 10-K and Note 5 (Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report.
DEPOSITS
Depositsoutstanding totaled $815.6$126.7 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, comparedor 17% of total loans. CRE construction loans totaled $27.9 billion at September 30, 2010, or 4% of total loans. CRE mortgage loans totaled $98.8 billion at September 30, 2010, or 13% of total loans. The portfolio is diversified both geographically and by property type. The largest geographic concentrations are found in California and Florida, which represented 22% and 11% of the total CRE portfolio, respectively. By property type, the largest concentrations are office buildings at 23% and industrial/warehouse at 11% of the portfolio.
The underwriting of CRE loans primarily focuses on cash flows and creditworthiness, and not solely collateral valuations. To identify and manage newly emerging problem CRE loans, we employ a high level of surveillance and regular customer interaction to understand and manage the risks associated with $824.0these assets, including regular loan reviews and appraisal updates. As issues are identified, management is engaged and dedicated workout groups are in place to manage problem assets. At September 30, 2010, the recorded investment in PCI CRE loans totaled $6.7 billion, down from $12.3 billion since the Wachovia acquisition at December 31, 2009. Comparative detail of average deposit balances is provided in2008, reflecting the reduction resulting from loan resolutions and write-downs.
The following table under “Earnings Performance — Net Interest Income” earlier in this Report. Total core deposits were $758.7 billion at Junesummarizes CRE loans by state and property type with the related nonaccrual totals. At September 30, 2010, down from $780.7the highest concentration of total loans by state was $28.4 billion in California, more than double the next largest state concentration, and the related nonaccrual loans totaled about $1.7 billion, or 6% of CRE loans in California. Office buildings, at December 31, 2009.
             
  
  June 30 Dec. 31   
(in millions) 2010  2009  % Change 
  
Noninterest-bearing $175,013   181,356   (3)%
Interest-bearing checking  61,195   63,225   (3)
Market rate and other savings  405,412   402,448   1 
Savings certificates  88,117   100,857   (13)
Foreign deposits (1)  28,943   32,851   (12)
  
Core deposits  758,680   780,737   (3)
Other time and savings deposits  20,861   16,142   29 
Other foreign deposits  36,082   27,139   33 
  
Total deposits $815,623   824,018   (1)
  
  
(1)Reflects Eurodollar sweep balances included in core deposits.
$29.6 billion, were the largest property type concentration, more than double the next largest, and the related nonaccrual loans totaled $1.4 billion, or 5% of total CRE loans for office buildings. Of CRE mortgage loans (excluding CRE construction loans), 41% related to owner-occupied properties at September 30, 2010. Nonaccrual loans totaled 7% of the non-PCI outstanding balance at September 30, 2010.

19


CRE LOANS BY STATE AND PROPERTY TYPE
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
                             
 
  September 30, 2010 
  Real estate mortgage  Real estate construction  Total  % of 
  Nonaccrual  Outstanding  Nonaccrual  Outstanding  Nonaccrual  Outstanding  total 
(in millions) loans  balance (1)  loans  balance (1)  loans  balance (1)  loans 
  
By state:
                            
PCI loans:
                            
Florida
 $   471      720      1,191   *%
California
     625      228      853   * 
North Carolina
     187      416      603   * 
Georgia
     227      323      550   * 
New York
     288      268      556   * 
Other
     1,320      1,594      2,914(2)  * 
  
Total PCI loans
     3,118      3,549      6,667   1 
  
All other loans:
                            
California
  1,174   23,561   508   3,981   1,682   27,542   4 
Florida
  921   9,899   398   2,374   1,319   12,273   2 
Texas
  319   6,578   306   2,573   625   9,151   1 
North Carolina
  321   4,728   302   1,612   623   6,340   * 
Georgia
  325   3,612   162   1,011   487   4,623   * 
Virginia
  66   3,779   163   1,634   229   5,413   * 
Arizona
  234   3,390   221   794   455   4,184   * 
New York
  49   3,471   41   1,139   90   4,610   * 
New Jersey
  111   2,684   47   668   158   3,352   * 
Colorado
  96   2,865   89   730   185   3,595   * 
Other
  1,463   31,070   961   7,846   2,424   38,916(3)  5 
  
Total all other loans
  5,079   95,637   3,198   24,362   8,277   119,999   16 
  
Total
 $5,079   98,755   3,198   27,911   8,277   126,666   17%
  
By property:
                            
PCI loans:
                            
Apartments
 $   585      915      1,500   *%
Office buildings
     1,093      352      1,445   * 
1-4 family land
     238      728      966   * 
Retail (excluding shopping center)
     430      103      533   * 
Land (excluding 1-4 family)
     24      443      467   * 
Other
     748      1,008      1,756   * 
  
Total PCI loans
     3,118      3,549      6,667   1 
  
All other loans:
                            
Office buildings
  1,138   25,126   269   3,002   1,407   28,128   4 
Industrial/warehouse
  730   13,026   87   1,116   817   14,142   2 
Real estate — other
  657   13,181   103   896   760   14,077   2 
Apartments
  328   7,989   424   4,242   752   12,231   2 
Retail (excluding shopping center)
  617   9,708   137   935   754   10,643   1 
Land (excluding 1-4 family)
  18   491   712   7,227   730   7,718   1 
Shopping center
  338   6,483   264   1,772   602   8,255   1 
Hotel/motel
  509   5,658   84   874   593   6,532   * 
1-4 family land
  162   357   641   2,447   803   2,804   * 
Institutional
  100   2,704   9   253   109   2,957   * 
Other
  482   10,914   468   1,598   950   12,512   2 
  
Total all other loans
  5,079   95,637   3,198   24,362   8,277   119,999   16 
  
Total
 $5,079   98,755(4)  3,198   27,911   8,277   126,666   17%
  
  
*Less than 1%
(1)For PCI loans amounts represent carrying value.
(2)Includes 35 states; no state had loans in excess of $526 million.
(3)Includes 40 states; no state had loans in excess of $3.0 billion.
(4)Includes $40.7 billion of loans to owner-occupants where 51% or more of the property is used in the conduct of their business.
(continued on following page)

20


(continued from previous page)
                             
 
  December 31, 2009 
  Real estate mortgage  Real estate construction  Total  % of 
  Nonaccrual  Outstanding  Nonaccrual  Outstanding  Nonaccrual  Outstanding  total 
(in millions) loans  balance (1)  loans  balance (1)  loans  balance (1)  loans 
  
By state:                            
PCI loans:
                            
Florida $   629      1,115      1,744   *%
California     995      271      1,266   * 
North Carolina     150      618      768   * 
Georgia     226      523      749   * 
Virginia     219      480      699   * 
Other     1,918      2,200      4,118(5)  * 
  
Total PCI loans     4,137      5,207      9,344   1 
  
All other loans:
                            
California  1,132   22,739   874   5,024   2,006   27,763   4 
Florida  563   9,899   374   3,227   937   13,126   2 
Texas  225   6,098   256   3,054   481   9,152   1 
North Carolina  179   4,983   161   2,079   340   7,062   * 
Georgia  207   3,809   127   1,507   334   5,316   * 
Virginia  53   3,080   117   1,974   170   5,054   * 
New York  53   3,591   49   1,456   102   5,047   * 
Arizona  158   3,810   200   1,193   358   5,003   * 
New Jersey  66   2,904   23   768   89   3,672   * 
Colorado  78   2,252   110   875   188   3,127   * 
Other  982   30,225   1,022   10,614   2,004   40,839(6)  5 
  
Total all other loans  3,696   93,390   3,313   31,771   7,009   125,161   16 
  
Total $3,696   97,527   3,313   36,978   7,009   134,505   17%
  
By property:                            
PCI loans:
                            
Apartments $   810      1,300      2,110   *%
Office buildings     1,443      399      1,842   * 
1-4 family land     270      1,076      1,346   * 
1-4 family structure     96      693      789   * 
Land (excluding 1-4 family)           759      759   * 
Other     1,518      980      2,498   * 
  
Total PCI loans     4,137      5,207      9,344   1 
  
All other loans:
                            
Office buildings  887   24,688   188   4,005   1,075   28,693   4 
Industrial/warehouse  508   13,643   36   1,281   544   14,924   2 
Real estate — other  550   13,563   102   1,105   652   14,668   2 
Apartments  267   7,102   254   5,138   521   12,240   2 
Retail (excluding shopping center)  597   10,457   108   1,327   705   11,784   2 
Land (excluding 1-4 family)  9   262   778   8,943   787   9,205   1 
Shopping center  204   5,912   210   2,398   414   8,310   1 
Hotel/motel  208   5,216   123   1,160   331   6,376   * 
1-4 family land  77   232   764   3,156   841   3,388   * 
1-4 family structure  60   1,065   689   2,199   749   3,264   * 
Other  329   11,250   61   1,059   390   12,309   2 
  
Total all other loans  3,696   93,390   3,313   31,771   7,009   125,161   16 
  
Total $3,696   97,527(7)  3,313   36,978   7,009   134,505   17%
  
  
(5)Includes 38 states; no state had loans in excess of $605 million.
(6)Includes 40 states; no state had loans in excess of $3.0 billion.
(7)Includes $42.1 billion of loans to owner-occupants where 51% or more of the property is used in the conduct of their business.

21


Commercial Loans and Lease Financing
For purposes of portfolio risk management, we aggregate commercial loans and lease financing according to market segmentation and standard industry codes. The following table summarizes commercial loans and lease financing by industry with the related nonaccrual totals. While this portfolio has experienced deterioration in the current credit cycle, we believe this portfolio has experienced less credit deterioration than our CRE portfolios as evidenced by its (1) lower percentage of loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing, (2) lower percentage of nonperforming loans to total loans outstanding at September 30, 2010, as well as (3) the lower year-to-date loss rate to the year-to-date average of total loans of 0.14%, 2.65% and 1.18% compared with 0.63%, 6.53% and 1.34%, respectively, for the CRE portfolios. We believe this portfolio is well underwritten and is diverse in its risk with relatively similar concentrations across several industries. A majority of our commercial loans and lease financing portfolio is secured by short-term assets, such as accounts receivable, inventory and securities, as well as long-lived assets, such as equipment and other business assets. Our credit risk management process for this portfolio primarily focuses on a customer’s ability to repay the loan through their cash flow. Generally, collateral securing this portfolio represents a secondary source of repayment.
COMMERCIAL LOANS AND LEASE FINANCING BY INDUSTRY
                         
 
  September 30, 2010  December 31, 2009 
          % of          % of 
  Nonaccrual  Outstanding  total  Nonaccrual  Outstanding  total 
(in millions) loans  balance (1)  loans  loans  balance (1)  loans 
  
PCI loans:
                        
Investors $   249   *% $   140   *%
Media     180   *      314   * 
Insurance     99   *      118   * 
Technology     67   *      72   * 
Leisure     52   *      110   * 
Healthcare     44   *      51   * 
Other     296(2)  *      1,106(2)  * 
  
Total PCI loans     987   *      1,911   * 
  
All other loans:
                        
Financial institutions  202   9,739   1   496   11,111   1 
Cyclical retailers  71   8,738   1   71   8,188   1 
Healthcare  106   7,665   1   88   8,397   1 
Food and beverage  97   8,085   1   77   8,316   1 
Oil and gas  181   7,560   1   202   8,464   1 
Industrial equipment  137   6,301   *   119   7,524   * 
Business services  132   5,377   *   99   6,722   * 
Transportation  50   6,151   *   31   6,469   * 
Utilities  194   5,011   *   15   5,752   * 
Real estate other  116   5,735   *   167   6,570   * 
Technology  43   5,738   *   72   5,489   * 
Investors  166   5,029   *   196   5,347   * 
Other  2,746   78,198(3)  10   2,935   82,302(3)  11 
  
Total all other loans  4,241   159,327   21   4,568   170,651   22 
  
Total $4,241   160,314   21% $4,568   172,562   22%
  
  
*Less than 1%
(1)For PCI loans amounts represent carrying value.
(2)No other single category had loans in excess of $44 million at September 30, 2010, or $122 million (residential construction) at December 31, 2009.
(3)No other single category had loans in excess of $4.4 billion at September 30, 2010, or $5.8 billion (public administration) at December 31, 2009. The next largest categories included public administration, hotel/restaurant, securities firms, media and non-residential construction.
During the recent credit cycle, we have experienced an increase in requests for extensions of commercial, and commercial real estate and construction loans which have repayment guarantees. All extensions are granted based on a re-underwriting of the loan and our assessment of the borrower’s ability to perform under the agreed-upon terms. At the time of extension, borrowers are generally performing in accordance

22


with the contractual loan terms. Extension terms generally range from six to thirty-six months and may require that the borrower provide additional economic support in the form of partial repayment, amortization or additional collateral or guarantees. In cases where the ordinary coursevalue of business,collateral or financial condition of the borrower is insufficient to repay our loan, we engagemay rely upon the support of an outside repayment guarantee in providing the extensions. In considering the impairment status of the loan, we evaluate the collateral and future cash flows as well as the anticipated support of any repayment guarantor. When performance under a loan is not reasonably assured, including the performance of the guarantor, we charge-off all or a portion of a loan based on the fair value of the collateral securing the loan.
Our ability to seek performance under the guarantee is directly related to the guarantor’s creditworthiness, capacity and willingness to perform. We evaluate a guarantor’s capacity and willingness to perform on an annual basis, or more frequently as warranted. Our evaluation is based on the most current financial transactionsinformation available and is focused on various key financial metrics, including net worth, leverage, and current and future liquidity. We consider the guarantor’s reputation, creditworthiness, and willingness to work with us based on our analysis as well as other lenders’ experience with the guarantor. Our assessment of the guarantor’s credit strength is reflected in our loan risk ratings for such loans. The loan risk rating is an important factor in our allowance methodology for commercial and commercial real estate loans.
Purchased Credit-Impaired (PCI) Loans
As of December 31, 2008, certain of the loans acquired from Wachovia had evidence of credit deterioration since their origination, and it was probable that we would not collect all contractually required principal and interest payments. Such loans identified at the time of the acquisition were accounted for using the measurement provisions for PCI loans. PCI loans were recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition, and any related allowance for loan losses was not permitted to be carried over. PCI loans were written down to an amount estimated to be collectible. Accordingly, such loans are not classified as nonaccrual, even though they may be contractually past due, because we expect to fully collect the new carrying values of such loans (that is, the new cost basis arising out of our purchase accounting).
A nonaccretable difference was established in purchase accounting for PCI loans to absorb losses expected at that time on those loans. Amounts absorbed by the nonaccretable difference do not affect the income statement or the allowance for credit losses. Substantially all our commercial, CRE and foreign PCI loans are accounted for as individual loans. Conversely, Pick-a-Pay and other consumer PCI loans have been aggregated into several pools based on common risk characteristics. Each pool is accounted for as a single asset with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows. Resolutions of loans may include sales of loans to third parties, receipt of payments in settlement with the borrower, or foreclosure of the collateral. Our policy is to remove an individual loan from a pool based on comparing the amount received from its resolution with its contractual amount. Any difference between these amounts is absorbed by the nonaccretable difference. This removal method assumes that the amount received from resolution approximates pool performance expectations. The remaining accretable yield balance is unaffected and any material change in remaining effective yield caused by this removal method is addressed by our quarterly cash flow evaluation process for each pool. For loans in pools that are not recordedresolved by payment in full, there is no release of the balance sheet, or may be recorded innonaccretable difference since there is no difference between the balance sheet in amounts that are different fromamount received at resolution and the full contract or notionalcontractual amount of the transaction. These transactions are designedloan. Modified PCI loans should not be removed from a pool even if those loans would otherwise be deemed troubled debt restructurings (TDRs). In the first nine months of 2010, we recognized in income $890 million of nonaccretable difference related to (1) meetcommercial PCI loans due to payoffs and dispositions of these loans. We also transferred $3.2 billion from the financial needsnonaccretable difference to the accretable yield, of customers, (2) manage our credit, market or liquidity risks, (3) diversify our funding sources, and/or (4) optimize capital.

23


which $2.4 billion was due to sustained positive performance in the Pick-a-Pay portfolio evidenced through an increase in expected cash flows. The following table provides an analysis of changes in the nonaccretable difference related to principal that is not expected to be collected.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET TRANSACTIONS WITH UNCONSOLIDATED ENTITIES
In the normal course of business, we enter into various types of on- and off-balance sheet transactions with special purpose entities (SPEs), which are corporations, trusts or partnerships that are established for a limited purpose. Historically, the majority of SPEs were formed in connection with securitization transactions. For more information on securitizations, including sales proceeds and cash flows from securitizations, see Note 7 (Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities) to Financial Statements in this Report.
NEWLY CONSOLIDATED VIE ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
Effective January 1, 2010, we adopted new consolidation accounting guidance and, accordingly, consolidated certain VIEs that were not included in our consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2009. On January 1, 2010, we recorded the assets and liabilities of the newly consolidated variable interest entities (VIEs) and derecognized our existing interests in those VIEs. We also recorded a $183 million increase to beginning retained earnings as a cumulative effect adjustment and recorded a $173 million increase to other comprehensive income (OCI).
The following table presents the net incremental assets recorded on our balance sheet by structure type upon adoption of new consolidation accounting guidance.
     
 
  Incremental 
  assets as of 
(in millions) Jan. 1, 2010 
  
Structure type:
    
Residential mortgage loans — nonconforming (1) $11,479 
Commercial paper conduit  5,088 
Other  2,002 
  
Total $18,569 
  
  
(1) Represents certain of our residential mortgage loans that are not guaranteed by GSEs (“nonconforming”).
In accordance with the transition provisions of the new consolidation accounting guidance, we initially recorded newly consolidated VIE assets and liabilities at a basis consistent with our accounting for respective assets at their amortized cost basis, except for those VIEs for which the fair value option was elected. The carrying amount for loans approximate the outstanding unpaid principal balance, adjusted for allowance for loan losses. Short-term borrowings and long-term debt approximate the outstanding par amount due to creditors.
Upon adoption of new consolidation accounting guidance on January 1, 2010, we elected fair value option accounting for certain nonconforming residential mortgage loan securitization VIEs. This election requires us to recognize the VIE’s eligible assets and liabilities on the balance sheet at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings. Such eligible assets and liabilities consisted primarily of loans and long-term debt, respectively. The fair value option was elected for those newly consolidated

2017


VIEs for which our interests, prior to January 1, 2010, were predominantly carried at fair value with changes in fair value recorded to earnings. Accordingly, the fair value option was elected to effectively continue fair value accounting through earnings for those interests. Conversely, fair value option was not elected for those newly consolidated VIEs that did not share these characteristics. At January 1, 2010, the fair value of loans and long-term debt for which the fair value option was elected was $1.0 billion and $1.0 billion, respectively. The incremental impact of electing fair value option (compared to not electing) on the cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings was an increase of $15 million.
RISK MANAGEMENT
All financial institutions must manage and control a variety of business risks that can significantly affect their financial performance. Key among these are credit, asset/liability and market risk.
For further discussion about how we manage these risks, see pages 54—7154-71 of our 2009 Form 10-K. The discussion that follows is intended to provide an update on these risks.
CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT
Our credit risk management process is governed centrally, but provides for decentralized credit management and accountability by our lines of business. Our overall credit process includes comprehensive credit policies, judgmental or statistical credit underwriting, frequent and detailed risk measurement and modeling, extensive credit training programs, and a continual loan review and audit process. In addition, regulatory examiners review and perform detailed tests of our credit underwriting, loan administration and allowance processes. For more information on our credit risk management process, please refer to page 54 in our 2009 Form 10-K.

21


Credit Quality Overview
In connection with first quarter 2010 results, we said we believed quarterly creditCredit losses peaked in fourth quarter 2009 and provision expense peakeddeclined in third quarter 2009. The significant reduction2010, which continued to support our belief that quarterly credit loss levels peaked in credit losses in second quarter 2010 confirmed our prior outlook and we have seen credit quality improve earlier and to a greater extent than we had previously expected.2009. The continued improvement in credit performance is a result of a slowly improving economy coupled with actions we have taken by the Company over the past several years to improve underwriting standards, mitigate losses and exit portfolios with unattractive credit metrics.
 Quarterly credit losses declined 16%9% to $4.1 billion in third quarter 2010 from $4.5 billion in second quarter 2010 and declined 20% from $5.3 billion in firstthird quarter 2010.2009. This improvement in losses was broad based across most of the consumer portfolios, with reduced losses in the home equity, private student lending, Wells Fargo Financial, Pick-a-Pay, consumer lines and loans, auto dealer serviceswealth management and credit card portfolios.
 Losses in the commercial portfolio continued to improve from the higher levels experienced last year, including a 10%17% linked-quarter reduction in commercial real estateCRE losses.
 We also saw improvement in early indicatorsOur PCI loan portfolio continued to perform better than originally expected. In third quarter 2010 $639 million of credit quality, with improved 30 day delinquencies in many portfolios, including Business Direct, credit card, home equity, student lendingnonaccretable difference was reclassified to accretable yield and Wells Fargo Home Mortgage.is expected to accrete to future income over the remaining life of the underlying loans. In addition, $202 million of nonaccretable difference was released into income for commercial loans that were paid off or sold.
 Based on declining losses and improved credit quality trends, the provision for credit losses of $4.0$3.4 billion was $500$650 million less than net charge-offs in secondthird quarter 2010. Absent significant deterioration in the economy, we currently expect future reductions in the allowance for loan losses.
Measuring and monitoring our credit risk is an ongoing process that tracks delinquencies, collateral values, economic trends by geographic areas, loan-level risk grading for certain portfolios (typically commercial) and other indications of risk to loss. Our credit risk monitoring process is designed to enable early identification of developing risk to loss and to support our determination of an adequate allowance for loan losses. During the current economic cycle our monitoring and resolution efforts have focused on

18


loan portfolios exhibiting the highest levels of risk including mortgage loans supported by real estate (both consumer and commercial), junior lien, commercial, credit card and subprime portfolios. The following sections include additional information regarding each of these loan portfolios and their relevant concentrations and credit quality performance metrics.
The following table identifies our non-strategic and liquidating loan portfolios as of June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009.portfolios.
NON-STRATEGIC AND LIQUIDATING LOAN PORTFOLIOS
                
 
 Outstanding balances  Outstanding balances 
 June 30 Dec. 31 Sept. 30, Dec. 31,
(in billions) 2010 2009  2010 2009 
   
Commercial and commercial real estate PCI loans (1) $8.8 11.3  $7.7 11.3 
Pick-a-Pay mortgage (1) 80.2 85.2  77.3 85.2 
Liquidating home equity 7.6 8.4  7.3 8.4 
Legacy Wells Fargo Financial indirect auto 8.3 11.3  7.1 11.3 
Legacy Wells Fargo Financial debt consolidation (2) 20.4 22.4  19.7 22.4 
   
Total non-strategic and liquidating loan portfolios $125.3 138.6  $119.1 138.6 
   
   
(1) Net of purchase accounting adjustments related to PCI loans.
(2) In July 2010, we announced the restructuring of our Wells Fargo Financial division and exiting the origination of non-prime portfolio mortgage loans.

22


Commercial Real Estate (CRE) (CRE)
The CRE portfolio consists of both CRE mortgages and CRE construction loans. The combined CRE loans outstanding totaled $130.5$126.7 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, or 17% of total loans. CRE construction loans totaled $30.9$27.9 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, or 4% of total loans. Permanent CRE mortgage loans totaled $99.6$98.8 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, or 13% of total loans. The portfolio is diversified both geographically and by property type. The largest geographic concentrations are found in California and Florida, which represented 22% and 11% of the total CRE portfolio, respectively. By property type, the largest concentrations are office buildings at 23% and industrial/warehouse at 12%11% of the portfolio.
The underwriting of CRE loans primarily focuses on cash flows and creditworthiness, and not solely collateral valuations. To identify and manage newly emerging problem CRE loans, we employ a high level of surveillance and regular customer interaction to understand and manage the risks associated with these assets, including regular loan reviews and appraisal updates. As issues are identified, management is engaged and dedicated workout groups are in place to manage problem assets. At JuneSeptember 30, 2010, the remaining balance ofrecorded investment in PCI CRE loans totaled $7.7$6.7 billion, down from a balance of $19.3$12.3 billion since the Wachovia acquisition at December 31, 2008, reflecting the reduction resulting from loan resolutions and write-downs.
The following table summarizes CRE loans by state and property type with the related nonaccrual totals. At JuneSeptember 30, 2010, the highest concentration of non-PCI CREtotal loans by state was $27.3$28.4 billion in California, more than double the next largest state concentration, and the related nonaccrual loans totaled about $1.7 billion, or 6.2%6% of CRE loans in California. Office buildings, at $27.9$29.6 billion, of non-PCI loans, were the largest property type concentration, almostmore than double the next largest, and the related nonaccrual loans totaled $1.5$1.4 billion, or 5.3%5% of total CRE loans for office buildings. Of CRE mortgage loans (excluding CRE construction loans), 42%41% related to owner-occupied properties at JuneSeptember 30, 2010. Nonaccrual loans totaled 6.6%7% of the non-PCI outstanding balance at JuneSeptember 30, 2010.

2319


CRE LOANS BY STATE AND PROPERTY TYPE
                                                        
 
 June 30, 2010  September 30, 2010 
 Real estate mortgage Real estate construction Total % of  Real estate mortgage Real estate construction Total % of 
 Nonaccrual Outstanding Nonaccrual Outstanding Nonaccrual Outstanding total  Nonaccrual Outstanding Nonaccrual Outstanding Nonaccrual Outstanding total 
(in millions) loans balance (1) loans balance (1) loans balance (1) loans  loans balance (1) loans balance (1) loans balance (1) loans 
   

By state:

  
PCI loans:
  
Florida
 $ 561  886  1,447  *% $ 471  720  1,191  *%
California
  731  258  989 *   625  228  853 * 
North Carolina
  199  481  680 *   187  416  603 * 
Georgia
  260  382  642 *   227  323  550 * 
Virginia
  227  391  618 * 
New York
  288  268  556 * 
Other
  1,509  1,796   3,305(2) *   1,320  1,594   2,914(2) * 
   
Total PCI loans
  3,487  4,194  7,681 1   3,118  3,549  6,667 1 
   

All other loans:

  
California
 1,109 22,987 593 4,311 1,702 27,298 4  1,174 23,561 508 3,981 1,682 27,542 4 
Florida
 853 9,667 475 2,754 1,328 12,421 2  921 9,899 398 2,374 1,319 12,273 2 
Texas
 284 6,549 311 2,650 595 9,199 1  319 6,578 306 2,573 625 9,151 1 
North Carolina
 226 4,891 255 1,669 481 6,560 *  321 4,728 302 1,612 623 6,340 * 
Georgia
 303 3,850 111 1,149 414 4,999 *  325 3,612 162 1,011 487 4,623 * 
Virginia
 57 3,075 184 1,791 241 4,866 *  66 3,779 163 1,634 229 5,413 * 
Arizona
 195 3,744 342 937 537 4,681 *  234 3,390 221 794 455 4,184 * 
New York
 52 3,940 40 1,221 92 5,161 *  49 3,471 41 1,139 90 4,610 * 
New Jersey
 87 2,814 57 702 144 3,516 *  111 2,684 47 668 158 3,352 * 
Colorado
 95 3,031 86 777 181 3,808 *  96 2,865 89 730 185 3,595 * 
Other
 1,428 31,591 975 8,724 2,403  40,315(3) 5  1,463 31,070 961 7,846 2,424  38,916(3) 5 
   
Total all other loans
 4,689 96,139 3,429 26,685 8,118 122,824 16  5,079 95,637 3,198 24,362 8,277 119,999 16 
   
Total
 $4,689 99,626 3,429 30,879 8,118 130,505  17% $5,079 98,755 3,198 27,911 8,277 126,666  17%
   

By property:

  
PCI loans:
  
Apartments
 $ 709  1,004  1,713  *% $ 585  915  1,500  *%
Office buildings
  1,148  376  1,524 *   1,093  352  1,445 * 
1-4 family land
  242  852  1,094 *   238  728  966 * 
Retail (excluding shopping center)
  437  167  604 *   430  103  533 * 
Land (excluding 1-4 family)
  21  576  597 *   24  443  467 * 
Other
  930  1,219  2,149 *   748  1,008  1,756 * 
   
Total PCI loans
  3,487  4,194  7,681 1   3,118  3,549  6,667 1 
   

All other loans:

  
Office buildings
 1,179 24,545 309 3,357 1,488 27,902 4  1,138 25,126 269 3,002 1,407 28,128 4 
Industrial/warehouse
 674 13,519 93 1,129 767 14,648 2  730 13,026 87 1,116 817 14,142 2 
Real estate — other
 601 13,215 114 904 715 14,119 2  657 13,181 103 896 760 14,077 2 
Apartments
 283 7,770 330 4,482 613 12,252 2  328 7,989 424 4,242 752 12,231 2 
Retail (excluding shopping center)
 599 10,210 158 1,192 757 11,402 1  617 9,708 137 935 754 10,643 1 
Land (excluding 1-4 family)
 21 343 778 7,931 799 8,274 1  18 491 712 7,227 730 7,718 1 
Shopping center
 308 6,312 241 1,959 549 8,271 1  338 6,483 264 1,772 602 8,255 1 
Hotel/motel
 375 5,553 105 904 480 6,457 *  509 5,658 84 874 593 6,532 * 
1-4 family land
 114 314 685 2,695 799 3,009 *  162 357 641 2,447 803 2,804 * 
Institutional
 85 2,721 39 229 124 2,950 *  100 2,704 9 253 109 2,957 * 
Other
 450 11,637 577 1,903 1,027 13,540 2  482 10,914 468 1,598 950 12,512 2 
   
Total all other loans
 4,689 96,139 3,429 26,685 8,118 122,824 16  5,079 95,637 3,198 24,362 8,277 119,999 16 
   
Total
 $4,689  99,626(4) 3,429 30,879 8,118 130,505  17% $5,079  98,755(4) 3,198 27,911 8,277 126,666  17%
   
   
* Less than 1%
(1) For PCI loans amounts represent carrying value.
(2) Includes 3735 states; no state had loans in excess of $570$526 million.
(3) Includes 40 states; no state had loans in excess of $3.1$3.0 billion.
(4) Includes $41.8$40.7 billion of loans to owner-occupants where 51% or more of the property is used in the conduct of their business.
(continued on following page)

2420


(continued from previous page)
                             
 
  December 31, 2009 
  Real estate mortgage  Real estate construction  Total  % of 
  Nonaccrual  Outstanding  Nonaccrual  Outstanding  Nonaccrual  Outstanding  total 
(in millions) loans  balance (1)  loans  balance (1)  loans  balance (1)  loans 
  
By state:                            
PCI loans:
                            
Florida $   629      1,115      1,744   *%
California     995      271      1,266   * 
North Carolina     150      618      768   * 
Georgia     226      523      749   * 
Virginia     219      480      699   * 
Other     1,918      2,200      4,118(5)  * 
  
Total PCI loans     4,137      5,207      9,344   1 
  
All other loans:
                            
California  1,132   22,739   874   5,024   2,006   27,763   4 
Florida  563   9,899   374   3,227   937   13,126   2 
Texas  225   6,098   256   3,054   481   9,152   1 
North Carolina  179   4,983   161   2,079   340   7,062   * 
Georgia  207   3,809   127   1,507   334   5,316   * 
Virginia  53   3,080   117   1,974   170   5,054   * 
New York  53   3,591   49   1,456   102   5,047   * 
Arizona  158   3,810   200   1,193   358   5,003   * 
New Jersey  66   2,904   23   768   89   3,672   * 
Colorado  78   2,252   110   875   188   3,127   * 
Other  982   30,225   1,022   10,614   2,004   40,839(6)  5 
  
Total all other loans  3,696   93,390   3,313   31,771   7,009   125,161   16 
  
Total $3,696   97,527   3,313   36,978   7,009   134,505   17%
  
By property:                            
PCI loans:
                            
Apartments $   810      1,300      2,110   *%
Office buildings     1,443      399      1,842   * 
1-4 family land     270      1,076      1,346   * 
1-4 family structure     96      693      789   * 
Land (excluding 1-4 family)           759      759   * 
Other     1,518      980      2,498   * 
  
Total PCI loans     4,137      5,207      9,344   1 
  
All other loans:
                            
Office buildings  887   24,688   188   4,005   1,075   28,693   4 
Industrial/warehouse  508   13,643   36   1,281   544   14,924   2 
Real estate — other  550   13,563   102   1,105   652   14,668   2 
Apartments  267   7,102   254   5,138   521   12,240   2 
Retail (excluding shopping center)  597   10,457   108   1,327   705   11,784   2 
Land (excluding 1-4 family)  9   262   778   8,943   787   9,205   1 
Shopping center  204   5,912   210   2,398   414   8,310   1 
Hotel/motel  208   5,216   123   1,160   331   6,376   * 
1-4 family land  77   232   764   3,156   841   3,388   * 
1-4 family structure  60   1,065   689   2,199   749   3,264   * 
Other  329   11,250   61   1,059   390   12,309   2 
  
Total all other loans  3,696   93,390   3,313   31,771   7,009   125,161   16 
  
Total $3,696   97,527(7)  3,313   36,978   7,009   134,505   17%
  
  
(5) Includes 38 states; no state had loans in excess of $605 million.
(6) Includes 40 states; no state had loans in excess of $3.0 billion.
(7) Includes $42.1 billion of loans to owner-occupants where 51% or more of the property is used in the conduct of their business.

2521


Commercial Loans and Lease Financing
For purposes of portfolio risk management, we aggregate commercial loans and lease financing according to market segmentation and standard industry codes. The following table summarizes commercial loans and lease financing by industry with the related nonaccrual totals. ThisWhile this portfolio has experienced deterioration in the current credit cycle, we believe this portfolio has experienced less credit deterioration than our CRE portfolioportfolios as evidenced by its (1) lower nonaccrualpercentage of loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing, (2) lower percentage of nonperforming loans to total loans outstanding at September 30, 2010, as well as (3) the lower year-to-date loss rate to the year-to-date average of 2.5%total loans of 0.14%, 2.65% and 1.18% compared with 6.2%0.63%, 6.53% and 1.34%, respectively, for the CRE portfolios. We believe this portfolio is well underwritten and is diverse in its risk with relatively similar concentrations across several industries. A majority of our commercial loans and lease financing portfolio is secured by short-term assets, such as accounts receivable, inventory and securities, as well as long-lived assets, such as equipment and other business assets. Our credit risk management process for this portfolio primarily focuses on a customer’s ability to repay the loan through their cash flow. Generally, collateral securing this portfolio represents a secondary source of repayment.
COMMERCIAL LOANS AND LEASE FINANCING BY INDUSTRY
                                                
 
 June 30, 2010 December 31, 2009  September 30, 2010 December 31, 2009 
 % of % of  % of % of 
 Nonaccrual Outstanding total Nonaccrual Outstanding total  Nonaccrual Outstanding total Nonaccrual Outstanding total 
(in millions) loans balance (1) loans loans balance (1) loans  loans balance (1) loans loans balance (1) loans 
   

PCI loans:

  
Investors $ 249  *% $ 140  *%

Media

 $ 159  *% $ 314  *%  180 *  314 * 
Real estate investment trust  92 *  351 * 
Insurance  108 *  118 *   99 *  118 * 
Investors  113 *  140 * 
Airlines  73 *  87 * 
Technology  69 *  72 *   67 *  72 * 
Leisure  52 *  110 * 
Healthcare  44 *  51 * 
Other   499(2) *   829(2) *    296(2) *   1,106(2) * 
   
Total PCI loans  1,113 *  1,911 *   987 *  1,911 * 
   

All other loans:

  
Financial institutions 141 11,529 2 496 11,111 1  202 9,739 1 496 11,111 1 
Cyclical retailers 82 8,374 1 71 8,188 1  71 8,738 1 71 8,188 1 
Healthcare 112 8,125 1 88 8,397 1  106 7,665 1 88 8,397 1 
Food and beverage 78 7,859 1 77 8,316 1  97 8,085 1 77 8,316 1 
Oil and gas 219 7,863 1 202 8,464 1  181 7,560 1 202 8,464 1 
Industrial equipment 96 6,503 * 119 7,524 *  137 6,301 * 119 7,524 * 
Business services 138 5,341 * 99 6,722 *  132 5,377 * 99 6,722 * 
Transportation 61 6,177 * 31 6,469 *  50 6,151 * 31 6,469 * 
Utilities 10 5,216 * 15 5,752 *  194 5,011 * 15 5,752 * 
Real estate other 141 5,767 * 167 6,570 *  116 5,735 * 167 6,570 * 
Technology 42 5,486 * 72 5,489 *  43 5,738 * 72 5,489 * 
Hotel/restaurant 224 4,693 * 195 5,050 * 
Investors 166 5,029 * 196 5,347 * 
Other 2,662  75,530(3) 10 2,936  82,599(3) 11  2,746  78,198(3) 10 2,935  82,302(3) 11 
   
Total all other loans 4,006 158,463 21 4,568 170,651 22  4,241 159,327 21 4,568 170,651 22 
   
Total $4,006 159,576  21% $4,568 172,562  22% $4,241 160,314  21% $4,568 172,562  22%
   
   
* Less than 1%
(1) For PCI loans amounts represent carrying value.
(2) No other single category had loans in excess of $66$44 million at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, or $110$122 million (leisure)(residential construction) at December 31, 2009.
(3) No other single category had loans in excess of $4.7$4.4 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, or $5.8 billion (public administration) at December 31, 2009. The next largest categories included public administration, investors,hotel/restaurant, securities firms, media and non-residential construction and leisure.construction.
During the recent credit cycle, we have experienced an increase in requests for extensions of constructioncommercial, and commercial real estate and construction loans which have repayment guarantees. All extensions are granted based on a re-underwriting of the loan and our assessment of the borrower’s ability to perform under the agreed-upon terms. At the time of extension, borrowers are generally performing in accordance

22


with the contractual loan terms. Extension terms generally range from six to thirty-six months and may require that the borrower provide additional economic support in the form of partial repayment, amortization or additional collateral or guarantees. In cases where the value of collateral or financial condition of the

26


borrower is insufficient to repay our loan, we may rely upon the support of an outside repayment guarantee in providing the extensions. In considering the impairment status of the loan, we evaluate the collateral and future cash flows as well as the anticipated support of any repayment guarantor. When performance under a loan is not reasonably assured, including the performance of the guarantor, we charge-off all or a portion of a loan based on the fair value of the collateral securing the loan.
Our ability to seek performance under the guarantee is directly related to the guarantor’s creditworthiness, capacity and willingness to perform. We evaluate a guarantor’s capacity and willingness to perform on an annual basis, or more frequently as warranted. Our evaluation is based on the most current financial information available and is focused on various key financial metrics, including net worth, leverage, and current and future liquidity. We consider the guarantor’s reputation, creditworthiness, and willingness to work with us based on our analysis as well as other lenders’ experience with the guarantor. Our assessment of the guarantor’s credit strength is reflected in our loan risk ratings for such loans. The loan risk rating is an important factor in our allowance methodology for commercial and commercial real estate loans.
Purchased Credit-Impaired (PCI) Loans
As of December 31, 2008, certain of the loans acquired from Wachovia had evidence of credit deterioration since their origination, and it was probable that we would not collect all contractually required principal and interest payments. Such loans identified at the time of the acquisition were accounted for using the measurement provisions for PCI loans. PCI loans were recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition, and any related allowance for loan losses was not permitted to be carried over. PCI loans were written down to an amount estimated to be collectible. Accordingly, such loans are not classified as nonaccrual, even though they may be contractually past due, because we expect to fully collect the new carrying values of such loans (that is, the new cost basis arising out of our purchase accounting).
A nonaccretable difference was established in purchase accounting for PCI loans to absorb losses expected at that time on those loans. Amounts absorbed by the nonaccretable difference do not affect the income statement or the allowance for credit losses. Substantially all our commercial, CRE and foreign PCI loans are accounted for as individual loans. Conversely, Pick-a-Pay and other consumer PCI loans have been aggregated into several pools based on common risk characteristics. Each pool is accounted for as a single asset with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows. Resolutions of loans may include sales of loans to third parties, receipt of payments in settlement with the borrower, or foreclosure of the collateral. Our policy is to remove an individual loan from a pool based on comparing the amount received from its resolution with its contractual amount. Any difference between these amounts is absorbed by the nonaccretable difference. This removal method assumes that the amount received from resolution approximates pool performance expectations. The remaining accretable yield balance is unaffected and any material change in remaining effective yield caused by this removal method is addressed by our quarterly cash flow evaluation process for each pool. For loans in pools that are resolved by payment in full, there is no release of the nonaccretable difference since there is no difference between the amount received at resolution and the contractual amount of the loan. Modified PCI loans should not be removed from a pool even if those loans would otherwise be deemed troubled debt restructurings (TDRs). In the first nine months of 2010, we recognized in income $890 million of nonaccretable difference related to commercial PCI loans due to payoffs and dispositions of these loans. We also transferred $3.2 billion from the nonaccretable difference to the accretable yield, of

23


which $2.4 billion was due to sustained positive performance in the Pick-a-Pay portfolio evidenced through an increase in expected cash flows. The following table provides an analysis of changes in the nonaccretable difference related to principal that is not expected to be collected.
CHANGES IN NONACCRETABLE DIFFERENCE FOR PCI LOANS
                 
 
  Commercial,          
  CRE and      Other    
(in millions) foreign  Pick-a-Pay  consumer  Total 
  
Balance, December 31, 2008 $10,410   26,485   4,069   40,964 
Release of nonaccretable difference due to:                
Loans resolved by settlement with borrower (1)  (330)        (330)
Loans resolved by sales to third parties (2)  (86)     (85)  (171)
Reclassification to accretable yield for loans with improving cash flows (3)  (138)  (27)  (276)  (441)
Use of nonaccretable difference due to:                
Losses from loan resolutions and write-downs (4)  (4,853)  (10,218)  (2,086)  (17,157)
  
Balance, December 31, 2009
  5,003   16,240   1,622   22,865 
Release of nonaccretable difference due to:
                
Loans resolved by settlement with borrower (1)
  (739)        (739)
Loans resolved by sales to third parties (2)
  (151)        (151)
Reclassification to accretable yield for loans with improving cash flows (3)
  (561)  (2,356)  (317)  (3,234)
Use of nonaccretable difference due to:
                
Losses from loan resolutions and write-downs (4)
  (1,478)  (2,409)  (325)  (4,212)
  
Balance, September 30, 2010
 $2,074   11,475   980   14,529 
  
                 
  
Balance, June 30, 2010
 $2,923   11,992   1,289   16,204 
Release of nonaccretable difference due to:
                
Loans resolved by settlement with borrower (1)
  (153)        (153)
Loans resolved by sales to third parties (2)
  (49)        (49)
Reclassification to accretable yield for loans with improving cash flows (3)
  (392)     (247)  (639)
Use of nonaccretable difference due to:
                
Losses from loan resolutions and write-downs (4)
  (255)  (517)  (62)  (834)
  
Balance, September 30, 2010
 $2,074   11,475   980   14,529 
  
  
(1)Release of the nonaccretable difference for settlement with borrower, on individually accounted PCI loans, increases interest income in the period of settlement. Pick-a-Pay and Other consumer PCI loans do not reflect nonaccretable difference releases due to pool accounting for those loans, which assumes that the amount received approximates the pool performance expectations.
(2)Release of the nonaccretable difference as a result of sales to third parties increases noninterest income in the period of the sale.
(3)Reclassification of nonaccretable difference for increased cash flow estimates to the accretable yield will result in increasing income and thus the rate of return realized. Amounts reclassified to accretable yield are expected to be probable of realization over the estimated remaining life of the loan.
(4)Write-downs to net realizable value of PCI loans are charged to the nonaccretable difference when severe delinquency (normally 180 days) or other indications of severe borrower financial stress exist that indicate there will be a loss of contractually due amounts upon final resolution of the loan.
Since the Wachovia acquisition, we have released $5.1 billion in nonaccretable difference for certain PCI loans and pools of loans, including $3.7 billion transferred from the nonaccretable difference to the accretable yield and $1.4 billion released through loan resolutions. We have provided $1.6 billion in the allowance for credit losses for certain PCI loans or pools of loans, which have had loss-related decreases to expected cash flows. The net result is a $3.5 billion improvement in our initial projected losses on all PCI loans. At September 30, 2010, the allowance for credit losses in excess of nonaccretable difference on certain PCI loans was $379 million. The allowance is necessary to absorb decreases in expected cash flows since acquisition and primarily relates to commercial, CRE and foreign loans, which are accounted for as individual loans. The following table analyzes the actual and projected loss results on PCI loans since the acquisition of Wachovia on December 31, 2008, through September 30, 2010.

24


                 
 
  Commercial,          
  CRE and      Other    
(in millions) foreign  Pick-a-Pay  consumer  Total 
  
Release of unneeded nonaccretable difference due to:                
Loans resolved by settlement with borrower (1) $1,069         1,069 
Loans resolved by sales to third parties (2)  237      85   322 
Reclassification to accretable yield for loans with improving cash flows (3)  699   2,383   593   3,675 
  
Total releases of nonaccretable difference due to better than expected losses  2,005   2,383   678   5,066 
Provision for worse than originally expected losses (4)  (1,565)     (38)  (1,603)
  
Actual and projected losses on PCI loans better than originally expected $440   2,383   640   3,463 
  
(1)Release of the nonaccretable difference for settlement with borrower, on individually accounted PCI loans, increases interest income in the period of settlement. Pick-a-Pay and Other consumer PCI loans do not reflect nonaccretable difference releases due to pool accounting for those loans, which assumes that the amount received approximates the pool performance expectations.
(2)Release of the nonaccretable difference as a result of sales to third parties increases noninterest income in the period of the sale.
(3)Reclassification of nonaccretable difference for increased cash flow estimates to the accretable yield will result in increasing income and thus the rate of return realized. Amounts reclassified to accretable yield are expected to be probable of realization over the estimated remaining life of the loan.
(4)Provision for additional losses recorded as a charge to income, when it is estimated that the expected cash flows for a PCI loan or pool of loans have decreased subsequent to the acquisition.
For further information on PCI loans, see Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — Loans) to Financial Statements in the 2009 Form 10-K and Note 5 (Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Pick-a-Pay Portfolio
As part of the Wachovia acquisition, we acquired residential first mortgage and home equity loans that are very similar to the Wells Fargo core originated portfolio. We also acquired the Pick-a-Pay portfolio, which describes one of the consumer mortgage portfolios. Under purchase accounting for the Wachovia acquisition, we made purchase accounting adjustments toconsidered a majority of the Pick-a-Pay loans considered to be impaired under accounting guidance for PCI loans.
Our Pick-a-Pay portfolio had an unpaid principal balance of $97.1$93.0 billion and a carrying value of $80.2$77.3 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2010. The Pick-a-Pay portfolio is a liquidating portfolio, as Wachovia ceased originating new Pick-a-Pay loans in 2008. Equity lines of credit and closed-end second liens associated with Pick-a-Pay loans are reported in the Home Equity core portfolio. The Pick-a-Pay portfolio includes loans that offer payment options (Pick-a-Pay option payment loans), loans that were originated without the option payment feature, loans that no longer offer the option feature as a result of our modification efforts since the acquisition, and loans where the customer voluntarily converted to a fixed-rate product. The following table provides balances over time related to the types of loans included in the portfolio.
                                                
 
 June 30, 2010 December 31, 2009 December 31, 2008  September 30, 2010 December 31, 2009 December 31, 2008 
(in millions) Outstandings % of total Outstandings % of total Outstandings % of total  Outstandings % of total Outstandings % of total Outstandings % of total 
   
Option payment loans $63,974  66% $73,060  70% $101,297  86% $58,345  63% $73,060  70% $101,297  86%
Non-option payment ARMs and fixed-rate loans 13,286 14 14,178 14 15,978 14 
Loan modifications — Pick-a-Pay 19,851 20 16,420 16   
Non-option payment adjustable- 
rate and fixed-rate loans 12,778 14 14,178 14 15,978 14 
Full-term loan modifications 21,865 23 16,420 16   
   
Total unpaid principal balance $97,111  100% $103,658  100% $117,275  100% $92,988  100% $103,658  100% $117,275  100%
   
Total carrying value $80,208 $85,238 $95,315  $77,304 $85,238 $95,315 
   
 

25


PCI loans in the Pick-a-Pay portfolio had an unpaid principal balance of $51.0$48.3 billion and a carrying value of $34.9$33.5 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2010. The carrying value of the PCI loans is net of purchase accounting write-downs to reflect their fair value at acquisition. Upon acquisition, we recorded a $22.4 billion net write-down in purchase accounting on Pick-a-Pay loans that were impaired.
Due to the sustained positive performance observed on the Pick-a-Pay portfolio compared to the original acquisition estimates, we have reclassified $1.8$2.4 billion from the nonaccretable difference to the accretable yield in second quarter 2010 for a total of $2.4 billion that has been reclassified since the Wachovia merger. This improvement in the lifetime credit outlook for this portfolio is primarily attributable to the significant modification efforts and the observed emergence ofemerging performance on these modifications as well as the portfolio’s delinquency

27


stabilization over the last several months. stabilization. This improvement in the credit outlook willis expected to be realized over the remaining life of the portfolio, which is estimated to have a weighted average life of approximately eightnine years. There have been no significant changes to the credit outlook in third quarter 2010, so there was no additional reclassification from the nonaccretable difference to the accretable yield balance in the quarter. The accretable yield income recognition percentage in third quarter 2010 was 4.61% compared to 4.49% in second quarter 2010. The third quarter increase in the yield was driven by added accretion for the factors that influenced the large second quarter reclassification of nonaccretable difference, partially offset by declining indices for variable rate PCI loans. Quarterly fluctuations in the accretable yield can be driven by changes in interest rate indices for variable rate PCI loans, prepayment assumptions, and expected principal and interest payments over the estimated life of the portfolio. Quarterly changes in the projected timing of cash flow events including REO liquidations, modifications and short sales can also impact the accretable yield percentage and the estimated weighted average life of the portfolio.
Pick-a-Pay option payment loans may be adjustable or fixed rate. They are home mortgages on which the customer has the option each month to select from among four payment options: (1) a minimum payment as described below, (2) an interest-only payment, (3) a fully amortizing 15-year payment, or (4) a fully amortizing 30-year payment.
The minimum monthly payment for substantially all of our Pick-a-Pay loans is reset annually. The new minimum monthly payment amount generally increases by no more than 7.5% of the prior minimum monthly payment. The minimum payment may not be sufficient to pay the monthly interest due and in those situations a loan on which the customer has made a minimum payment is subject to “negative amortization,” where unpaid interest is added to the principal balance of the loan. The amount of interest that has been added to a loan balance is referred to as “deferred interest.” Total deferred interest was $3.2$2.9 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, down from $3.7 billion at December 31, 2009, due to loan modification efforts as well as falling interest rates resulting in the minimum payment option covering the interest and some principal on many loans. At JuneSeptember 30, 2010, approximately 64%70% of customers choosing the minimum payment option did not defer interest. In situations where the minimum payment is greater than the interest-only option, the customer has only three payment options available: (1) a minimum required payment, (2) a fully amortizing 15-year payment, or (3) a fully amortizing 30-year payment.
Deferral of interest on a Pick-a-Pay loan may continue as long as the loan balance remains below a pre-defined principal cap, which is based on the percentage that the current loan balance represents to the original loan balance. Loans with an original loan-to-value (LTV) ratio equal to or below 85% have a cap of 125% of the original loan balance, and these loans represent substantially all the Pick-a-Pay portfolio. Loans with an original LTV ratio above 85% have a cap of 110% of the original loan balance. Most of the Pick-a-Pay loans on which there is a deferred interest balance re-amortize (the monthly payment amount is “recast”) on the earlier of the date when the loan balance reaches its principal cap, or the 10-year anniversary of the loan. For a small population of Pick-a-Pay loans, the recast occurs at the five-year

26


anniversary. After a recast, the customers’ new payment terms are reset to the amount necessary to repay the balance over the remainder of the original loan term.
Due to the terms of this Pick-a-Pay portfolio, we believe there is minimal recast risk over the next three years. Based on assumptions of a flat rate environment, if all eligible customers elect the minimum payment option 100% of the time and no balances prepay, we would expect the following balances of option payment loans to recast based on reaching the principal cap: $2$3 million in the remaining halfquarter of 2010, $1 million in 2011 and $3 million in 2012. In secondthird quarter 2010, no option payment loans recast based on reaching the principal cap. In addition, we would expect the following balances of option payment loans to start fully amortizing due to reaching their recast anniversary date and also having a payment change at the recast date greater than the annual 7.5% reset: $12$13 million in the remaining halfquarter of 2010, $37$43 million in 2011 and $41$73 million in 2012. In secondthird quarter 2010, the amount of option payment loans reaching their recast anniversary date and also having a payment change over the annual 7.5% reset was $12$11 million.
The following table reflects the geographic distribution of the Pick-a-Pay portfolio broken out between PCI loans and all other loans. In stressed housing markets with declining home prices and increasing delinquencies, the LTV ratio is a useful metric in predicting future real estate 1-4 family first mortgage loan performance, including potential charge-offs. Because PCI loans were initially recorded at fair value written down for expected credit losses, the ratio of the carrying value to the current collateral value for

28


acquired loans with credit impairment will be lower as compared with the LTV based on the unpaid principal. For informational purposes, we have included both ratios in the following table.
PICK-A-PAY PORTFOLIO (1)
                                                        
 
 PCI loans All other loans  PCI loans All other loans 
 Ratio of        Ratio of       
 carrying        carrying       
 Unpaid Current value to Unpaid Current    Unpaid Current value to Unpaid Current   
 principal LTV Carrying current principal LTV Carrying  principal LTV Carrying current principal LTV Carrying 
(in millions) balance ratio (2) value (3) value balance ratio (2) value (3)  balance ratio (2) value (3) value balance ratio (2) value (3) 
   

June 30, 2010

 
September 30, 2010
 
California
 $34,458 137% $23,505 93% $22,653 90% $22,283  $32,475  134% $22,382  92% $21,914  88% $21,542 
Florida
 5,375 146 3,098 84 4,817 109 4,621  5,154 143 3,057 84 4,698 106 4,480 
New Jersey
 1,590 100 1,241 77 2,747 81 2,729  1,565 99 1,243 78 2,671 81 2,647 
Texas
 412 80 366 71 1,842 65 1,846  393 80 350 71 1,785 65 1,789 
Washington
 601 101 519 86 1,380 84 1,366  577 100 501 86 1,353 82 1,334 
Other states
 8,582 117 6,170 83 12,654 88 12,464  8,155 116 5,933 84 12,248 87 12,046 
               
Total Pick-a-Pay loans
 $51,018 $34,899 $46,093 $45,309  $48,319 $33,466 $44,669 $43,838 
               
   

December 31, 2009

  
California $37,341 141% $25,022 94% $23,795 93% $23,626  $37,341  141% $25,022  94% $23,795  93% $23,626 
Florida 5,751 139 3,199 77 5,046 104 4,942  5,751 139 3,199 77 5,046 104 4,942 
New Jersey 1,646 101 1,269 77 2,914 82 2,912  1,646 101 1,269 77 2,914 82 2,912 
Texas 442 82 399 74 1,967 66 1,973  442 82 399 74 1,967 66 1,973 
Washington 633 103 543 88 1,439 84 1,435  633 103 543 88 1,439 84 1,435 
Other states 9,283 116 6,597 82 13,401 87 13,321  9,283 116 6,597 82 13,401 87 13,321 
               
Total Pick-a-Pay loans $55,096 $37,029 $48,562 $48,209  $55,096 $37,029 $48,562 $48,209 
               
   
(1) The individual states shown in this table represent the top five states based on the total net carrying value of the Pick-a-Pay loans at the beginning of 2010. The December 31, 2009 table has been revised to conform to the 2010 presentation of top five states.
(2) The current LTV ratio is calculated as the unpaid principal balance plus the unpaid principal balance of any equity lines of credit that share common collateral divided by the collateral value. Collateral values are generally determined using automated valuation models (AVM) and are updated quarterly. AVMs are computer-based tools used to estimate market values of homes based on processing large volumes of market data including market comparables and price trends for local market areas.
(3) Carrying value, which does not reflect the allowance for loan losses, includes purchase accounting adjustments, which, for PCI loans are the nonaccretable difference and the accretable yield, and for all other loans, an adjustment to mark the loans to a market yield at date of merger less any subsequent charge-offs.

27


To maximize return and allow flexibility for customers to avoid foreclosure, we have in place several loss mitigation strategies for our Pick-a-Pay loan portfolio. We contact customers who are experiencing difficulty and may in certain cases modify the terms of a loan based on a customer’s documented income and other circumstances.
We also have taken steps to work with customers to refinance or restructure their Pick-a-Pay loans into other loan products. For customers at risk, we offer combinations of term extensions of up to 40 years (from 30 years), interest rate reductions, forbearance of principal, interest only payments for a period of time and, in geographies with substantial property value declines, we will even offer permanent principal reductions.
In fourth quarter 2009, we rolled out the U.S. Treasury Department’s HAMPHome Affordability Modification Program (HAMP) to the customers in this portfolio. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2010, over 15,00013,000 HAMP applications were being reviewed by our loan servicing department and an additional 13,5008,000 loans have been approved for the HAMP trial modification. We believe a key factor to successful loss mitigation is tailoring the revised loan payment to the customer’s sustainable income. We continually reassess our loss mitigation strategies and may adopt additional or different strategies in the future.
In secondthird quarter 2010, we completed 7,052over 9,000 proprietary and HAMP loan modifications and have completed over 64,00073,000 modifications since the Wachovia acquisition. The majority of the loan modifications were

29


concentrated in our PCI Pick-a-Pay loan portfolio. Approximately 5,4004,800 modification offers were proactively sent to customers in secondthird quarter 2010. As part of the modification process, the loans are re-underwritten, income is documented and the negative amortization feature is eliminated. Most of the modifications result in material payment reduction to the customer. Because of the write-down of the PCI loans in purchase accounting, our post merger modifications to PCI Pick-a-Pay loans have not resulted in any modification-related provision for credit losses. To the extent we modify loans not in the PCI Pick-a-Pay portfolio, we establish an impairment reserve in accordance with the applicable accounting requirements for loan restructurings.TDRs.
Home Equity Portfolios
The deterioration in specific segments of the legacy Wells Fargo Home Equity portfolios, which began almost three years ago,in 2007, required a targeted approach to managing these assets. In fourth quarter 2007, a liquidating portfolio was identified, consisting of home equity loans generated through the wholesale channel not behind a Wells Fargo first mortgage, and home equity loans acquired through correspondents. The liquidating portion of the Home Equity portfolio was $7.6$7.3 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, compared with $8.4 billion at December 31, 2009. The loans in this liquidating portfolio represent about 1% of our total loans outstanding at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, and contain some of the highest risk in our $123.0$120.7 billion Home Equity portfolio, with a loss rate of 10.90%10.59% compared with 3.54%3.28% for the core portfolio. The loans in the liquidating portfolio are largely concentrated in geographic markets that have experienced the most abrupt and steepest declines in housing prices. The core portfolio was $115.3$113.4 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, of which 97%98% was originated through the retail channel and approximately 19% of the outstanding balance was in a first lien position. The following table includes the credit attributes of these two portfolios. California loans represent the largest state concentration in each of these portfolios and have experienced among the highest early-term delinquency and loss rates.

28


HOME EQUITY PORTFOLIOS (1)
                                                
 
 % of loans Loss rate  % of loans Loss rate 
 two payments (annualized)  two payments (annualized) 
 Outstanding balances or more past due Quarter ended  Outstanding balances or more past due Quarter ended 
 June 30 Dec. 31 June 30 Dec. 31 June 30 Dec. 31 Sept. 30, Dec. 31, Sept. 30, Dec. 31, Sept. 30, Dec. 31,
(in millions) 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009  2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 
   
Core portfolio
  
California $28,819 30,264  3.67% 4.12 4.70 6.12  $28,448 30,264  3.43% 4.12 4.27 6.12 
Florida 12,616 12,038 4.95 5.48 6.02 6.98  12,353 12,038 5.38 5.48 5.80 6.98 
New Jersey 8,416 8,379 2.45 2.50 1.84 1.51  8,821 8,379 3.19 2.50 1.95 1.51 
Virginia 5,802 5,855 1.86 1.91 2.00 1.13  5,804 5,855 2.23 1.91 1.66 1.13 
Pennsylvania 5,240 5,051 1.86 2.03 1.22 1.81  5,558 5,051 2.30 2.03 1.24 1.81 
Other 54,439 53,811 2.73 2.85 2.96 3.04  52,404 53,811 2.80 2.85 2.76 3.04 
   
Total (2) 115,332 115,398 3.11 3.35 3.54 3.90  113,388 115,398 3.22 3.35 3.28 3.90 
   
Liquidating portfolio
  
California 2,860 3,205 7.50 8.78 15.36 17.94  2,705 3,205 6.96 8.78 14.77 17.94 
Florida 366 408 8.40 9.45 14.84 19.53  347 408 7.95 9.45 13.29 19.53 
Arizona 169 193 8.78 10.46 22.31 19.29  158 193 8.73 10.46 21.14 19.29 
Texas 141 154 2.24 1.94 2.57 2.40  132 154 2.36 1.94 2.17 2.40 
Minnesota 100 108 5.70 4.15 7.59 7.53  96 108 5.44 4.15 10.18 7.53 
Other 4,003 4,361 4.35 5.06 7.22 7.33  3,824 4,361 4.29 5.06 7.23 7.33 
   
Total 7,639 8,429 5.80 6.74 10.90 12.16  7,262 8,429 5.53 6.74 10.59 12.16 
   
Total core and liquidating portfolios $122,971 123,827 3.28 3.58 4.00 4.48  $120,650 123,827 3.36 3.58 3.73 4.48 
   
   
(1) Consists of real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgages and lines of credit secured by real estate, excluding PCI loans.
(2) Includes equity lines of credit and closed-end second liens associated with the Pick-a-Pay portfolio totaling $1.7 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, and $1.8 billion at December 31, 2009.

30


Wells Fargo Financial
Wells Fargo Financial’s portfolio consists of real estate loans, substantially all of which are secured debt consolidation loans, and both prime and non-prime auto secured loans, unsecured loans and credit cards. In July 2010, we announced the restructuring of our Wells Fargo Financial division and that we are exiting the origination of non-prime portfolio mortgage loans. The remaining consumer and commercial loan products offered through Wells Fargo Financial will be realigned with those offered by our other business units and will be available through our expanded network of community banking and home mortgage stores.
Wells Fargo Financial had $23.5$22.6 billion in real estate secured loans at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, and $25.8 billion at December 31, 2009. Of this portfolio, $1.4$1.3 billion and $1.6 billion, respectively, was considered prime based on secondary market standards and has been priced to the customer accordingly. The remaining portfolio is non-prime but was originated with standards to reduce credit risk. These loans were originated through our retail channel with documented income, LTV limits based on credit quality and property characteristics, and risk-based pricing. In addition, the loans were originated without teaser rates, interest-only or negative amortization features. Credit losses in the portfolio have increased in the current economic environment compared with historical levels, but performance remained similar to prime portfolios in the industry with overall loss rates of 4.20%4.09% (annualized) in the first halfnine months of 2010 on the entire portfolio. At JuneSeptember 30, 2010, $7.8$7.3 billion of the portfolio was originated with customer FICO scores below 620, but these loans have further restrictions on LTV and debt-to-income ratios intended to limit the credit risk. Loss rates in this portfolio were 3.62% (annualized) in the third quarter and 3.73% (annualized) in the first nine months of 2010 for FICO scores of 620 and above, and 4.26% (annualized) and 4.81% (annualized), respectively, for FICO scores below 620.

29


Wells Fargo Financial also had $13.4$11.9 billion in auto secured loans and leases at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, and $16.5 billion at December 31, 2009, of which $4.0$3.2 billion and $4.4 billion, respectively, were originated with customer FICO scores below 620. Loss rates in this portfolio were 2.76%2.79% (annualized) in the secondthird quarter and 3.57%3.34% (annualized) in the first halfnine months of 2010 for FICO scores of 620 and above, and 3.59%3.94% (annualized) and 4.75%4.51% (annualized), respectively, for FICO scores below 620. These loans were priced based on relative risk. Of this portfolio, $8.3$7.1 billion represented loans and leases originated through its indirect auto business, a channel Wells Fargo Financial ceased using near the end of 2008.
Wells Fargo Financial had $7.2$7.1 billion in unsecured loans and credit card receivables at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, and $8.1 billion at December 31, 2009, of which $0.8 billion$783 million and $1.0 billion, respectively, was originated with customer FICO scores below 620. Net loss rates in this portfolio were 11.51%9.52% (annualized) in the secondthird quarter and 11.41%10.59% (annualized) in the first halfnine months of 2010 for FICO scores of 620 and above, and 15.51%13.26% (annualized) and 15.08%13.53% (annualized), respectively, for FICO scores below 620. Wells Fargo Financial has tightened credit policies and managed credit lines to reduce exposure during the recent economic environment.
Credit Cards
Our credit card portfolio, a portion of which is included in the Wells Fargo Financial discussion above, totaled $22.1$21.9 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, which represented 3% of our total outstanding loans and was smaller than the credit card portfolios of each of our large bank peers. Delinquencies of 30 days or more were 5.3%5.0% of credit card outstandings at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, down from 5.5% at December 31, 2009. Net charge-offs were 10.45%9.06% (annualized) for secondthird quarter 2010, down from 11.17%10.45% (annualized) in firstsecond quarter 2010, reflecting previous risk mitigation efforts that included tightened underwriting and line management changes. Enhanced underwriting criteria and line management initiatives instituted in previous quarters continued to have positive effects on loss performance.

31


Nonaccrual Loans and Other Nonperforming Assets
The following table shows the comparative data for nonaccrual loans and other nonperforming assets (NPAs). We generally place loans on nonaccrual status when:
 the full and timely collection of interest or principal becomes uncertain;
 they are 90 days (120 days with respect to real estate 1-4 family first and junior lien mortgages and auto loans) past due for interest or principal, (unlessunless both well-secured and in the process of collection);collection; or
 part of the principal balance has been charged off and no restructuring has occurred.
Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — Loans) to Financial Statements in our 2009 Form 10-K describes our accounting policy for nonaccrual and impaired loans.

30


NONACCRUAL LOANS AND OTHER NONPERFORMING ASSETS
                            
 
 June 30 Mar. 31 Dec. 31 Sept. 30, June 30, Mar. 31, Dec. 31,
(in millions) 2010 2010 2009  2010 2010 2010 2009 
   
Nonaccrual loans:  
Commercial and commercial real estate:  
Commercial (includes LHFS of $12, $0 and $19) $3,843 4,273 4,397 
Commercial (includes LHFS of $86, $12, $0 and $19) $4,103 3,843 4,273 4,397 
Real estate mortgage 4,689 4,345 3,696  5,079 4,689 4,345 3,696 
Real estate construction (includes LHFS of $7, $7 and $8) 3,429 3,327 3,313 
Real estate construction (includes LHFS of $3, $7, $7 and $8) 3,198 3,429 3,327 3,313 
Lease financing 163 185 171  138 163 185 171 
   
Total commercial and commercial real estate 12,124 12,130 11,577  12,518 12,124 12,130 11,577 
   
Consumer:  
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage (includes MHFS of $450, $412 and $339) 12,865 12,347 10,100 
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage (includes MHFS of $448, $450, $412 and $339) 12,969 12,865 12,347 10,100 
Real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage 2,391 2,355 2,263  2,380 2,391 2,355 2,263 
Other revolving credit and installment 316 334 332  312 316 334 332 
   
Total consumer 15,572 15,036 12,695  15,661 15,572 15,036 12,695 
   
Foreign 115 135 146  126 115 135 146 
   
Total nonaccrual loans (1)(2) 27,811 27,301 24,418  28,305 27,811 27,301 24,418 
   
As a percentage of total loans  3.63% 3.49 3.12   3.76% 3.63 3.49 3.12 
Foreclosed assets:  
GNMA loans (3) $1,344 1,111 960  $1,492 1,344 1,111 960 
Other 3,650 2,970 2,199  4,635 3,650 2,970 2,199 
Real estate and other nonaccrual investments (4) 131 118 62  141 131 118 62 
   
Total nonaccrual loans and other nonperforming assets $32,936 31,500 27,639  $34,573 32,936 31,500 27,639 
   
As a percentage of total loans  4.30% 4.03 3.53   4.59% 4.30 4.03 3.53 
   
 
(1) Excludes loans acquired from Wachovia that are accounted for as PCI loans because they continue to earn interest income from accretable yield, independent of performance in accordance with their contractual terms.
(2) See Note 5 to Financial Statements in this Report and Note 6 (Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in our 2009 Form 10-K for further information on impaired loans.
(3) Consistent with regulatory reporting requirements, foreclosed real estate securing Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) loans is classified as nonperforming. Both principal and interest for GNMA loans secured by the foreclosed real estate are collectible because the GNMA loans are insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) or guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).
(4) Includes real estate investments (contingent interest loans accounted for as investments) that would be classified as nonaccrual if these assets were recorded as loans, and nonaccrual debt securities.

32


Total NPAs were $32.9$34.6 billion (4.30%(4.59% of total loans) at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, and included $27.8$28.3 billion of nonaccrual loans and $5.1$6.3 billion of foreclosed assets, real estate, and other nonaccrual investments. The third quarter 2010 growth rate in nonaccrual loans slowedwas nearly the same as in second quarter 2010, whileand the balance still increased from firstsecond quarter 2010 by $510$494 million. The growth in second quarter occurred in theCommercial and commercial real estate portfolios (commercial and residential) which consist of secured loans.loans were the primary contributors to the growth. Nonaccruals in allmany other loan portfolios were essentially flat or down. New inflows to both nonaccrual commercial and consumer loans continued to decline (down 18% linked quarter).increased slightly. The amount of disposed nonaccruals increased for combined commercial and consumer loans (up 12%6% linked quarter), but was below the level of inflows. The following table provides an analysis of the changes in nonaccrual loans.

31


NONACCRUAL LOANS INFLOWS AND OUTFLOWS
                 
 
  Quarter ended 
  Sept. 30, June 30, Mar. 31, Dec. 31,
(in millions) 2010  2010  2010  2009 
  
Commercial nonaccruals
                
Balance, beginning of quarter $12,124   12,130   11,577   10,264 
Inflows  2,796   2,560   2,763   3,854 
Outflows  (2,402)  (2,566)  (2,210)  (2,541)
  
Balance, end of quarter  12,518   12,124   12,130   11,577 
  
Consumer nonaccruals
                
Balance, beginning of quarter  15,572   15,036   12,695   10,461 
Inflows  4,866   4,733   6,169   5,626 
Outflows  (4,777)  (4,197)  (3,828)  (3,392)
  
Balance, end of quarter  15,661   15,572   15,036   12,695 
  
Foreign nonaccruals (end of quarter)
  126   115   135   146 
  
Total $28,305   27,811   27,301   24,418 
  
  
Typically, changes to nonaccrual loans period-over-period represent inflows for loans that reach a specified past due status, offset by reductions for loans that are charged off, sold, transferred to foreclosed properties, or are no longer classified as nonaccrual because they return to accrual status. During 2009, due to purchase accounting, the rate of growth in nonaccrual loans was higher than it would have been without PCI loan accounting because the balance of nonaccrual loans in Wachovia’s loan portfolio was approximately zero at the beginning of 2009, due to purchase accounting write-downs taken at the close of acquisition. The impact of purchase accounting on our credit data will diminish over time. In addition, we have also increased loan modifications and restructurings to assist homeowners and other borrowers in the current difficult economic cycle. ThisThe increase in loan modifications and restructurings is expected to result in elevated nonaccrual loan levels in those portfolios which are being actively modified for longer periods because consumer nonaccrual loans that have been modified remain in nonaccrual status generally until a borrower has made six consecutive months of payments, or equivalent, inclusive of consecutive payments made prior to the modification. Loans are re-underwritten at the time of the modification in accordance with underwriting guidelines established for governmental and proprietary loan modification programs. For an accruing loan that has been modified, if the borrower has demonstrated performance under the previous terms and the underwriting process shows the capacity to continue to perform under the restructured terms, the loan will remain in accruing status. Otherwise, the loan will be placed in a nonaccrual status generally until the borrower has made six consecutive months of payments, or equivalent.
Loss expectations for nonaccrual loans are driven by delinquency rates, default probabilities and severities. While nonaccrual loans are not free of loss content, we believe the estimated loss exposure remaining in these balances is significantly mitigated by four factors. First, 98%99% of consumer nonaccrual loans and 96% of commercial nonaccrual loans are secured. Second, losses have already been recognized on 39%50% of the remaining balance of consumer nonaccruals and 33% of commercial nonaccruals.nonaccruals have been written down by $2.9 billion. Residential nonaccrual loans are written down to net realizable value at 180 days past due, except for loans that go into trial modification prior to going 180 days past due, which are not written down in the trial period (3 months) as long as trial payments are being made timely. Third, as of JuneSeptember 30, 2010, 54%58% of commercial nonaccrual loans were current on interest. Fourth, there are certainthe inherent risk of loss in all nonaccruals for which there are loan level reserves inis adequately covered by the allowance while others are covered by pool level reserves.for loan losses.
Commercial and CRE nonaccrual loans, net of write-downs, amounted to $12.5 billion at September 30, 2010, compared with $12.1 billion at both June 30, and March 31, 2010. Consumer nonaccrual loans (including nonaccrual troubled debt restructurings (TDRs))TDRs) amounted to $15.6$15.7 billion at September 30, 2010, compared with

32


$15.6 billion at June 30, 2010, compared with $15.0 billion at March 31, 2010. The $536$89 million increase in nonaccrual consumer loans from March 31,June 30, 2010, represented an increase of $518$104 million in 1-4 family first mortgage loans and an increasea decrease of $36$11 million in 1-4 family junior liens. Residential mortgage nonaccrual loans increased largely due to slower disposition as quarterly inflow has remained relatively stable. Federal government programs, such as HAMP, and Wells Fargo proprietary programs, such as the Company’s Pick-a-Pay Mortgage Assistance program, require customers to provide updated documentation and complete trial repayment periods, to evidence sustained performance, before the loan can be removed from nonaccrual status. In addition, for loans in foreclosure, many states, including California and Florida where Wells Fargo has significant exposures, have enacted legislation that significantly increases the time frames to complete the foreclosure process,

33


meaning that loans will remain in nonaccrual status for longer periods. At the conclusion of the foreclosure process, we continue to sell real estate owned in a very timely fashion.
When a consumer real estate loan is 120 days past due, we move it to nonaccrual status and when the loan reaches 180 days past due it is our policy to write these loans down to net realizable value, except for trial modifications. Thereafter, we revalue each loan in nonaccrual status regularly and recognize additional charges if needed. Our quarterly market classification process, employed since late 2007, indicates as of June 30, 2010, that home values in most metropolitan statistical areas have stabilized. We anticipate manageable additional write-downs while properties work through the foreclosure process.
Of the $15.6 billion of consumer nonaccrual loans:
99% are secured, substantially all by real estate; and
21% have a combined LTV ratio of 80% or below.
In addition to the $15.6$15.7 billion of consumer nonaccrual loans there were also accruing consumer TDRs98% are secured by real estate and 22% have a combined LTV ratio of $8.2 billion at June 30, 2010. In total, there were $23.8 billion80% or below.
The following table provides a summary of consumer nonaccrual loans and accruing TDRs at June 30, 2010.foreclosed assets:
FORECLOSED ASSETS
                 
 
  Sept. 30, June 30, Mar. 31, Dec. 31,
(in millions) 2010  2010  2010  2009 
  
GNMA loans $1,492   1,344   1,111   960 
PCI loans:                
Commercial  1,043   940   697   405 
Consumer  1,080   674   490   336 
  
Total PCI loans  2,123   1,614   1,187   741 
  
All other loans:                
Commercial  1,380   1,141   911   751 
Consumer  1,132   895   872   707 
  
Total all other loans  2,512   2,036   1,783   1,458 
  
Total foreclosed assets $6,127   4,994   4,081   3,159 
  
  
NPAs at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, included $1.3$1.5 billion of loans that are FHA insured or VA guaranteed, which are expected to have little to no loss content, and $3.7$4.6 billion of foreclosed assets, which have been written down to the value of the underlying collateral. Foreclosed assets increased $913 million,$1.1 billion, or 22%23%, in secondthird quarter 2010 from the prior quarter. Of this increase, $427$509 million were foreclosed loans from the PCI portfolio that are now recorded as foreclosed assets. The majority of the inherent loss content in these assets has already been accounted for, and increases to this population of assets should have minimal additional impact to expected loss levels.
Given our real estate-secured loan concentrations and current economic conditions, we anticipate continuing to hold a high level of NPAs on our balance sheet. We believe the loss content in the nonaccrual loans has either already been realized or provided for in the allowance for credit losses at JuneSeptember 30, 2010. We remain focused on proactively identifying problem credits, moving them to nonperforming status and recording the loss content in a timely manner. We’ve increased staffing in our residential workout and collection organizations to ensure troubled borrowers receive the attention and help they need. See the “Risk Management — Allowance for Credit Losses” section in this Report for

33


additional information. The performance of any one loan can be affected by external factors, such as economic or market conditions, or factors affecting a particular borrower.

34

We process foreclosures on a regular basis for the loans we service for others as well as those we hold in our loan portfolio. However, we utilize foreclosure only as a last resort for dealing with borrowers who are experiencing financial hardships. We employ extensive contact and restructuring procedures to attempt to find other solutions for our borrowers, and on average we attempt to contact borrowers over 75 times by phone and nearly 50 times by letter during the period from first delinquency to foreclosure sale.


We employ the same foreclosure procedures for loans we service for others as we use for loans that we hold in our portfolio. We believe we have designed an appropriate process for generating foreclosure affidavits and documentation for both foreclosures and mortgage securitizations. Completed foreclosure affidavits that are submitted to the courts are signed and notarized as one of the last steps in a multi-step process intended to comply with applicable law and ensure the quality of customer and loan data in foreclosure proceedings. Customer and loan data is derived directly from the Company’s official systems of record, and this data and its transmission to external foreclosure counsel are subject to quality controls, and audits are performed to assure the quality, accuracy, and reliability of these automated systems. See the “Overview” section and Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — Subsequent Events) to Financial Statements in this Report for additional information regarding our foreclosure processes.
Troubled Debt Restructurings (TDRs)
The following table provides information regarding the recorded investment in loans modified in TDRs.
                            
 
 June 30 Mar. 31 Dec. 31 Sept. 30, June 30, Mar. 31 Dec. 31,
(in millions) 2010 2010 2009  2010 2010 2010 2009 
   
Consumer TDRs:  
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage $9,525 7,972 6,685  $10,951 9,525 7,972 6,685 
Real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage 1,469 1,563 1,566  1,566 1,469 1,563 1,566 
Other revolving credit and installment 502 310 17  674 502 310 17 
   
Total consumer TDRs 11,496 9,845 8,268  13,191 11,496 9,845 8,268 
   
Commercial and commercial real estate TDRs 656 386 265  1,350 656 386 265 
   
Total TDRs $12,152 10,231 8,533  $14,541 12,152 10,231 8,533 
   
TDRs on nonaccrual status $3,877 2,738 2,289  $5,177 3,877 2,738 2,289 
TDRs on accrual status 8,275 7,493 6,244  9,364 8,275 7,493 6,244 
   
Total TDRs $12,152 10,231 8,533  $14,541 12,152 10,231 8,533 
   
   
We establish an impairment reserve when a loan is restructured in a TDR. The impairment reserve for TDRs was $2.9$3.6 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, and $1.8 billion at December 31, 2009. Total charge-offs related to loans modified in a TDR were $486$643 million and $163$317 million for the sixnine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Our nonaccrual policies are generally the same for all loan types when a restructuring is involved. We underwrite consumer loans at the time of restructuring to determine if there is sufficient evidence of sustained repayment capacity based on the borrower’s documented income, debt to income ratios, and other factors. Any loans lacking sufficient evidence of sustained repayment capacity at the time of modification are charged down to the fair value of the collateral. If the borrower has demonstrated performance under the previous terms and the underwriting process shows the capacity to continue to perform under the restructured terms, the loan will remain in accruing status. Otherwise, the loan will be placed in nonaccrual status generally until the borrower demonstrates a sustained period of performance which we generally believe to be six consecutive months of payments, or equivalent. Loans will also be placed on

34


nonaccrual, and a corresponding charge-off recorded to the loan balance, if we believe that principal and interest contractually due under the modified agreement will not be collectible.
We do not forgive principal for a majority of our TDRs, but in those situations where principal is forgiven, the entire amount of such principal forgiveness is immediately charged off. When a TDR performs in accordance with its modified terms, the loan either continues to accrue interest (for performing loans), or will return to accrual status after the borrower demonstrates a sustained period of performance.

35


Loans 90 Days or More Past Due and Still Accruing
Loans included in this category are 90 days or more past due as to interest or principal and still accruing, because they are (1) well-secured and in the process of collection or (2) real estate 1-4 family mortgage loans or consumer loans exempt under regulatory rules from being classified as nonaccrual. PCI loans of $13.0 billion at September 30, 2010, and $16.1 billion at December 31, 2009, are excluded from thethis disclosure of loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest. Eveneven though certain of themthey are 90 days or more contractually past due, theydue. These PCI loans are considered to be accruing because thetheir interest income on these loans relates to the accretable yield under the accounting for PCI loans and not to contractual interest payments.
Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing totaled $19.4were $18.8 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, and $22.2 billion at December 31, 2009. The totalsbalances included $14.4$14.5 billion and $15.3 billion, respectively, in advances pursuant to our servicing agreements to GNMA mortgage pools and similar loans whose repayments are insured by the FHA or guaranteed by the VA.
LOANS 90 DAYS OR MORE PAST DUE AND STILL ACCRUING (EXCLUDING
INSURED/GUARANTEED GNMA AND SIMILAR LOANS) (1)
                
 
 June 30 Dec. 31 Sept. 30, Dec. 31,
(in millions) 2010 2009  2010 2009 
   
Commercial and commercial real estate:  
Commercial $540 590  $222 590 
Real estate mortgage 654 1,014  463 1,014 
Real estate construction 471 909  332 909 
   
Total commercial and commercial real estate 1,665 2,513  1,017 2,513 
   
Consumer:  
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage (2)(1) 1,049 1,623  1,016 1,623 
Real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage (2)(1) 352 515  361 515 
Credit card 610 795  560 795 
Other revolving credit and installment 1,300 1,333  1,305 1,333 
   
Total consumer 3,311 4,266  3,242 4,266 
   
Foreign 21 73  27 73 
   
Total $4,997 6,852  $4,286 6,852 
   
   
(1)The carrying value of PCI loans contractually 90 days or more past due was $15.1 billion at June 30, 2010, and $16.1 billion at December 31, 2009. These amounts are excluded from the above table as PCI loan accretable yield interest recognition is independent from the underlying contractual loan delinquency status. See table on page 17 for detail of PCI loans.
(2) Includes mortgage loans held for sale 90 days or more past due and still accruing.
Excluding insured/guaranteed GNMA and similar loans, loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing at September 30, 2010, were down $2.6 billion, or 37%, from December 31, 2009. The decline was due to loss mitigation activities (including modifications, increased collection capacity/process improvements and charge-offs) and lower early stage delinquency levels/credit stabilization.

3635


Net Charge-offs
NET CHARGE-OFFS
                                                                
 
 Quarter ended June 30 Six months ended June 30 Quarter ended Sept. 30, Nine months ended Sept. 30,
 2010 2009 2010 2009  2010 2009 2010 2009 
 As a As a As a As a  As a As a As a As a 
 Net loan % of Net loan % of Net loan % of Net loan % of  Net loan % of Net loan % of Net loan % of Net loan % of 
 charge- average charge- average charge- average charge- average  charge- average charge- average charge- average charge- average 
($ in millions) offs loans (1) offs loans (1) offs loans (1) offs loans (1)  offs loans (1) offs loans (1) offs loans (1) offs loans (1) 
   
Commercial and commercial real estate:  
Commercial $689  1.87% $704  1.51% $1,339  1.77% $1,260  1.32% $509  1.38% $924  2.09% $1,848  1.65% $2,184  1.57%
Real estate mortgage 360 1.47 119 0.49 631 1.30 138 0.29  218 0.87 184 0.77 849 1.16 322 0.45 
Real estate construction 238 2.90 259 2.48 632 3.70 364 1.73  276 3.72 274 2.67 908 3.71 638 2.04 
Lease financing 27 0.78 61 1.68 56 0.82 78 1.04  23 0.71 82 2.26 79 0.78 160 1.43 
               
Total commercial and commercial real estate 1,314 1.80 1,143 1.35 2,658 1.80 1,840 1.07  1,026 1.42 1,464 1.78 3,684 1.67 3,304 1.30 
               
Consumer:  
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage 1,009 1.70 758 1.26 2,320 1.94 1,149 0.95  1,034 1.78 966 1.63 3,354 1.89 2,115 1.18 
Real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage 1,184 4.62 1,171 4.33 2,633 5.10 2,018 3.72  1,085 4.30 1,291 4.85 3,718 4.83 3,309 4.09 
Credit card 579 10.45 664 11.59 1,222 10.82 1,246 10.86  504 9.06 648 10.96 1,726 10.24 1,894 10.89 
Other revolving credit and installment 361 1.64 604 2.66 908 2.05 1,300 2.86  407 1.83 682 3.00 1,315 1.97 1,982 2.90 
               
Total consumer 3,133 2.79 3,197 2.77 7,083 3.12 5,713 2.47  3,030 2.72 3,587 3.13 10,113 2.99 9,300 2.69 
               
Foreign 42 0.57 46 0.61 78 0.54 91 0.58  39 0.52 60 0.79 117 0.53 151 0.65 
               
Total $4,489  2.33% $4,386  2.11% $9,819  2.52% $7,644  1.82% $4,095  2.14% $5,111  2.50% $13,914  2.40% $12,755  2.05%
               
   
(1) Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans are annualized.
Net charge-offs in secondthird quarter 2010 were $4.5$4.1 billion (2.33%(2.14% of average total loans outstanding, annualized) compared with $5.3$4.5 billion (2.71%(2.33%) in firstsecond quarter 2010, and $4.4$5.1 billion (2.11%(2.50%) a year ago. This quarter’s significant reduction in credit losses confirms our prior outlookbelief that credit losses peaked in fourth quarter 2009 and that credit quality appears to have improved earlier and to a greater extent than we had previously expected. Total credit losses included $1.3$1.0 billion of commercial and commercial real estate loans (1.80%(1.42%) and $3.1$3.0 billion of consumer loans (2.79%(2.72%) in secondthird quarter 2010 as shown in the table above.
Allowance for Credit Losses
The allowance for credit losses, which consists of the allowance for loan losses and the reserve for unfunded credit commitments, is management’s estimate of credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date and excludes loans carried at fair value. The detail of the changes in the allowance for credit losses, including charge-offs and recoveries by loan category, is in Note 5 (Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report.
We employ a disciplined process and methodology to establish our allowance for loan losses each quarter. This process takes into consideration many factors, including historical and forecasted loss trends, loan-level credit quality ratings and loan grade specific loss factors. The process involves subjective as well as complex judgments. In addition, we review a variety of credit metrics and trends. However, these trends are not determinative of the adequacy of the allowance as we use several analytical tools in determining the adequacy of the allowance.
For individually graded (typically commercial) portfolios, we generally use loan-level credit quality ratings, which are based on borrower information and strength of collateral, combined with historically based grade specific loss factors. The allowance for individually rated nonaccruing commercial loans with an outstanding exposure of $10 million or greater is determined through an individual impairment analysis. Those individually rated nonaccruing commercial loans with exposures below $10 million are evaluated using a loss factor assumption.assumption intended to collectively approximate an individual impairment

36


analysis result. For statistically evaluated portfolios (typically consumer), we

37


generally leverage models that use credit-related characteristics such as credit rating scores, delinquency migration rates, vintages, and portfolio concentrations to estimate loss content. Additionally, the allowance for TDRs is based on the risk characteristics of the modified loans and the resultant estimated cash flows discounted at the pre-modification effective yield of the loan. While the allowance is determined using product and business segment estimates, it is available to absorb losses in the entire loan portfolio.
At JuneSeptember 30, 2010, the allowance for loan losses totaled $24.6$23.9 billion (3.21%(3.18% of total loans), compared with $25.1$24.6 billion (3.22%(3.21%), at MarchJune 30, 2010, and $24.5 billion (3.13%) at December 31, 2010.2009. The allowance for credit losses was $24.4 billion (3.23% of total loans) at September 30, 2010, and $25.1 billion (3.27% of total loans)) at June 30, 2010, and $25.7$25.0 billion (3.28%(3.20%) at MarchDecember 31, 2010.2009. The allowance for credit losses included $225$379 million at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, and $247$333 million at MarchDecember 31, 2010,2009, related to PCI loans acquired from Wachovia. Loans acquired from Wachovia are included in total loans net of related purchase accounting net write-downs. The reserve for unfunded credit commitments was $501$433 million at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, and $533$515 million at MarchDecember 31, 2010.2009. In addition to the allowance for credit losses there was $16.2$14.5 billion of nonaccretable difference at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, and $19.9$22.9 billion at MarchDecember 31, 2010,2009, to absorb losses for PCI loans. For additional information on PCI loans, see the “Balance Sheet Analysis“Risk ManagementLoan Portfolio”Credit Risk Management — Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans” section and Note 5 (Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report.
The ratio of the allowance for credit losses to total nonaccrual loans was 90%86% at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, and 94%103% at MarchDecember 31, 2010. In general, this2009. This ratio may fluctuate significantly from period to period due to such factors as the mix of loan types in the portfolio, borrower credit strength and the value and marketability of collateral. Over half of nonaccrual loans were home mortgages, auto and other consumer loans at JuneSeptember 30, 2010.
Total provision for credit losses was $4.0$3.4 billion in secondthird quarter 2010, down from the peak of $6.1 billion in third quarter 2009 and from $5.3$4.0 billion in firstsecond quarter 2010. The secondthird quarter 2010 provision included a $500$650 million reserve release (net charge-offs less provision for credit losses), compared with a $700 million$1.0 billion reserve build a year ago. Total provision for credit losses was $9.3$12.8 billion for the first halfnine months of 2010, including the $500 million second quartera $1.2 billion reserve release, compared with $9.6$15.8 billion for the first halfnine months of 2009, which included a $2.0$3.0 billion reserve build.
We believe the allowance for credit losses of $25.1$24.4 billion was adequate to cover credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio, including unfunded credit commitments, at JuneSeptember 30, 2010. The allowance for credit losses is subject to change and we consider existing factors at the time, including economic and market conditions and ongoing internal and external examination processes. Due to the sensitivity of the allowance for credit losses to changes in the economic environment, it is possible that unanticipated economic deterioration would create incremental credit losses not anticipated as of the balance sheet date. Our process for determining the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses is discussed in the “Financial Review — Critical Accounting Policies — Allowance for Credit Losses” section and Note 5 (Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in our 2009 Form 10-K.

3837


ReserveLiability for Mortgage Loan Repurchase Losses
We sell residential mortgage loans to various parties, including government sponsored(1) Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae (GSEs) who include the mortgage loans in GSE-guaranteed mortgage securitizations, (2) special purpose entities (GSEs)that issue private label mortgage-backed securities (MBS), and (3) other financial institutions that purchase mortgage loans for investment or private label securitization. In addition, we pool FHA-insured and VA-guaranteed mortgage loans which back securities guaranteed by GNMA. The agreements under contractualwhich we sell mortgage loans and the insurance or guaranty agreements with FHA and VA contain provisions that include various representations and warranties whichregarding the origination and characteristics of the mortgage loans. Although the specific representations and warranties vary among different sale, insurance or guarantee agreements, they typically cover ownership of the loan, compliance with loan criteria set forth in the applicable agreement, validity of the lien securing the loan, absence of delinquent taxes or liens against the property securing the loan, compliance with applicable origination laws, and similarother matters. We may be required to repurchase the mortgage loans, with identified defects, indemnify the securitization trust, investor or insurer, or reimburse the securitization trust, investor or insurer for credit losslosses incurred on the loanloans (collectively “repurchase”) in the event of a material breach of such contractual representations or warranties.warranties that is not remedied within a period (usually 90 days or less) after we receive notice of the breach. Typically, it is a condition to repurchase of a securitized loan that the breach must have had a material and adverse effect on the value of the mortgage loan or to the interests of the security holders in the mortgage loan. The time periods specified in our mortgage loan sales contracts to respond to repurchase requests vary, but are generally 90 days or less and generallyless. While many contracts do not include no specific remedies if the repurchaseapplicable time period for a response is not met.met, contracts for mortgage loan sales to the GSEs include various types of specific remedies and penalties that could be applied to inadequate responses to repurchase requests. Similarly, the agreements under which we sell mortgage loans require us to deliver various documents to the securitization trust or investor, and we may be obligated to repurchase any mortgage loan as to which the required documents are not delivered or are defective. Upon receipt of a repurchase request, we work with oursecuritization trusts, investors or insurers to arrive at a mutually agreeable resolution. Repurchase demands are typically reviewed on an individual loan by loan basis to validate the claims made by the securitization trust, investor or insurer and determine if a contractually required repurchase event occurred. Occasionally, in lieu of conducting the loan level evaluation, we may negotiate global settlements in order to resolve a pipeline of demands in lieu of repurchasing the loans. We manage the risk associated with potential repurchases or other forms of settlement through our underwriting and quality assurance practices and by servicing mortgage loans to meet investor and secondary market standards.
We establish mortgage repurchase reservesliabilities related to various representations and warranties that reflect management’s estimate of losses for loans for which we could have repurchase obligation, whether or not we currently service those loans, based on a combination of factors. Such factors incorporate estimated levels of defects based on internal quality assurance sampling, default expectations, historical investor repurchase demand and appeals success rates (where the investor rescinds the demand based on a cure of the defect or acknowledges that the loan satisfies the investor’s applicable representations and warranties), reimbursement by correspondent and other third party originators, and projected loss severity. We establish a reserveliability at the time loans are sold and continually update our reserveliability estimate during their life. Although investors may demand repurchase at any time, the majority of repurchase demands occurs in the first 24 to 36 months following origination of the mortgage loan and can vary by investor. Currently, repurchase demands primarily relate to 2006 through 2008 vintages. For additional information on our repurchase liability, including an adverse impact analysis, see Note 7 (Securitizationsvintages and Variable Interest Entities) to Financial Statements in this Report.
During second quarter 2010, we continued to experience elevated levels of repurchase activity measured by number of loans, investor repurchase demands and our level of repurchases. In the second quarter and first half of 2010 we repurchased or otherwise settled mortgage loans with balances of $530 million and $1.1 billion, respectively, and incurred net losses on repurchased or settled loans of $270 million and $442 million, respectively.GSE-guaranteed MBS. Most repurchases under our representation and warranty provisions are attributable to borrower misrepresentations and appraisals obtained at origination that investors believe do not fully comply with applicable industry standards. A majorityAlthough, to date, repurchase demands with respect to private label mortgage-backed securities have been more limited than with respect to GSE-guaranteed securities, it is possible that requests to repurchase mortgage loans in private label securitizations may increase in

38


frequency as investors explore every possible avenue to recover losses on their securities. In addition, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, as conservator of our repurchases continued to be government agency conforming loans from Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, recently used its subpoena power to request loan applications, property appraisals and predominantlyother documents from 2006 through 2008 originations.large mortgage securitization industry participants, including us, relating to private label MBS in order to determine whether breaches of representations and warranties exist in those securities owned by the GSEs. We believe the risk of repurchase in our private label securitizations is substantially reduced, relative to other private label securitizations, because approximately half of the private label securitizations which include our mortgage loans do not contain representations and warranties regarding borrower or other third party misrepresentations related to the mortgage loan, general compliance with underwriting guidelines, or property valuation, which are commonly asserted bases for repurchase. We evaluate the validity and materiality of any claim of breach of representations and warranties in private label MBS, which is brought to our attention and work with securitization trustees to resolve any repurchase requests. Nevertheless, we may be subject to legal and other expenses if private label securitization trustees or investors choose to commence legal proceedings in the event of disagreements. For additional information on our repurchase liability, including an adverse impact analysis, see Note 7 (Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities) to Financial Statements in this Report.

39

During third quarter 2010, we continued to experience elevated levels of repurchase activity measured by number of loans, investor repurchase demands and our level of repurchases. In the third quarter and first nine months of 2010 we repurchased or reimbursed investors for incurred losses on mortgage loans with balances of $768 million and $1.7 billion, respectively. Additionally, in the third quarter and first nine months of 2010, we negotiated global settlements on pools of mortgage loans of $450 million and $675 million, respectively, which effectively eliminates the risk of repurchase on these loans from our outstanding servicing portfolio. We incurred net losses on repurchased loans, investor reimbursements and loan pool global settlements totaling $414 million and $856 million for the third quarter and first nine months of 2010, respectively.


Adjustments made to our mortgage repurchase reserveliability in recent periods have incorporated the increase in repurchase demands, and mortgage insurance rescissions, and higher than anticipated losses on repurchased loans that we have experienced. The table below provides the number of unresolved repurchase demands and mortgage insurance rescissions as of June 30, 2010,rescissions. We generally do not have unresolved repurchase demands from the FHA and December 31, 2009.VA for loans in GNMA-guaranteed securities because those demands are few and we quickly resolve them.
                                        
 
 June 30, 2010 Dec. 31, 2009  Sept. 30, 2010 June 30, 2010 Dec. 31, 2009 
 Original Original  Original Original Original 
 Number of loan Number of loan  Number of loan Number of loan Number of loan 
($ in millions) loans balance (1) loans balance (1)  loans balance (1) loans balance (1) loans balance (1) 
   
Government sponsored entities (2) 12,536 $2,840 8,354 $1,911  9,887 $2,212 12,536 $2,840 8,354 $1,911 
Private 3,160 707 2,929 886  3,605 882 3,160 707 2,929 886 
Mortgage insurance rescissions (3) 2,979 760 2,965 859  3,035 748 2,979 760 2,965 859 
             
Total 18,675 $4,307 14,248 $3,656  16,527 $3,842 18,675 $4,307 14,248 $3,656 
   
   
(1) While original loan balance related to these demands is presented above, the establishment of the repurchase reserve is based on a combination of factors, such as our appeals success rates, reimbursement by correspondent and other third party originators, and projected loss severity, which is driven by the difference between the current loan balance and the estimated collateral value less costs to sell the property.
(2) Includes repurchase demands offor 2,263 loans, 2,141 loans and 1,536 loans with original loan balances totaling $437 million, $417 million and 1,536 and $322 million forat September 30 and June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, respectively, received from investors on mortgage servicing rights acquired from other originators. We have the right of recourse against the seller for these repurchase demands and would only incur a loss on these demands for counterparty risk associated with the seller.
(3) As part of our representations and warranties in our loan sales contracts, we represent that certain loans have mortgage insurance. To the extent the mortgage insurance is rescinded by the mortgage insurer, the lack of insurance may result in a repurchase demand from an investor.
The level of repurchase demands outstanding at September 30, 2010, was down from June 30, 2010, in both number of outstanding loans and in total dollar balances as we continued to work through the

39


demands. Customary with industry practice, Wells Fargo haswe have the right of recourse against correspondent lenders with respect to representations and warranties. Of the repurchase demands presented in the table above, approximately 20% relate to loans purchased from correspondent lenders. Due primarily to the financial difficulties of some correspondent lenders, we typically recover on average approximately 50% of losses from these lenders, and this estimate of theirlenders. Historical recovery rates as well as projected lender performance isare incorporated in the establishment of our mortgage repurchase reserve.liability.
Our reserveliability for repurchases, included in “Accrued expenses and other liabilities” in our consolidated financial statements, was $1.4$1.3 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, and $1.0 billion at December 31, 2009. In the secondthird quarter and first halfnine months of 2010, $382$370 million and $784 million,$1.2 billion, respectively, of additions to the reserveliability were recorded, which reduced net gains on mortgage loan origination/sales. Our additions to the repurchase reserve thisliability in third quarter reflect2010 reflects updated assumptions about the losses we expect on repurchases as well as the recent increase in repurchase demands and mortgage insurance rescissions as noted above. Also,repurchases. In particular, based on current uncertainty about the economic recovery and the loss severity we continue to experience on repurchased loans from the 2006 through 2008 vintages, we extended our assumptions about the time period over which we will incur the current elevated levellevels of loss severity.and the severity of loss.
We believe we have a very high quality residential mortgage servicing portfolio. Of the $1.8 trillion in the portfolio at September 30, 2010, 92% is current, less than 2% was subprime at origination and approximately 1% were home equity securitizations. Our combined delinquency and foreclosure rate on this portfolio is 8.14% at September 30, 2010, compared with 8.15% at June 30, 2010. In this portfolio 8% are private securitizations where we originated the loan and therefore have some repurchase risk; 55% of these loans are from 2005 vintages or earlier (weighted average age of 59 months), 83% are prime, approximately 70% are jumbo loans and the weighted average LTV as of September 30, 2010 was 73%. In addition, the highest risk segment of these private securitizations, subprime loans originated in 2006 and 2007, that have reps and warranties and currently have LTVs close to or exceeding 100% are 6% of the 8% private securitization portion of the residential mortgage servicing portfolio. We had only $69 million of repurchases related to private securitizations in third quarter 2010. Six percent of the servicing portfolio is non-agency acquired servicing and private whole loan sales, the majority of which we did not underwrite and securitize and therefore we have no obligation to the originator for any repurchase demands.
The following table summarizes the changes in our mortgage repurchase reserve.liability.
                                    
 
 Six months    Nine months   
 Quarter ended ended Year ended  Quarter ended ended Year ended 
 June 30 March 31 June 30 Dec. 31 Sept. 30, June 30, Mar. 31, Sept. 30, Dec. 31,
(in millions) 2010 2010 2010 2009  2010 2010 2010 2010 2009 
   
Balance, beginning of period $1,263 1,033 1,033 620  $1,375 1,263 1,033 1,033  620(1)
Provision for repurchase losses:  
Loan sales 36 44 80 302  29 36 44 109 302 
Change in estimate — primarily due to credit deterioration 346 358 704 625 
Change in estimate —primarily due to credit deterioration 341 346 358 1,045 625 
   
Total additions 382 402 784 927  370 382 402 1,154 927 
Losses  (270)  (172)  (442)  (514)  (414)  (270)  (172)  (856)  (514)
   
Balance, end of period $1,375 1,263 1,375 1,033  $1,331 1,375 1,263 1,331 1,033 
   
   

40

(1)Reflects purchase accounting refinements.


The mortgage repurchase reserveliability of $1.4$1.3 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, represents our best estimate of the probable loss that we may incur for various representations and warranties in the contractual provisions of our sales of mortgage loans. There may be a wide range of reasonably possible losses in excess of the estimated liability that cannot be estimated with confidence. Because the level of mortgage loan repurchase losses are dependent on economic factors, investor demand strategies and other external conditions that may

40


change over the life of the underlying loans, the level of the reserveliability for mortgage loan repurchase losses is difficult to estimate and requires considerable management judgment. We maintain regular contact with the GSEs and other significant investors to monitor and address their repurchase demand practices and concerns.
To the extent that economic conditions and the housing market do not recover or future investor repurchase demand and appeals success rates differ from past experience, we could continue to have increased demands and increased loss severity on repurchases, causing future additions to the repurchase reserve.liability. However, some of the underwriting standards that were permitted by the GSEs for conforming loans in the 2006 through 2008 vintages, and comparable underwriting standards employed by us for nonconforming loans during the same period, which significantly contributed to recent levels of repurchase demands, were tightened starting in mid to late 2008. Accordingly, we do not expect a similar rate of repurchase requests or a similar rate of loss severities from the 2009 and prospective vintages, absent deterioration in economic conditions or changes in investor behavior.
Risks Relating to Servicing Activities
In addition to servicing loans in our portfolio, we act as servicer and/or master servicer of residential mortgage loans included in GSE-guaranteed mortgage securitizations, including GNMA-guaranteed mortgage securitizations and private label mortgage securitizations, as well as for unsecuritized loans owned by institutional investors. The loans we service were originated by us or by other mortgage loan originators. As servicer, our primary duties are typically to (1) collect payment due from borrowers, (2) advance certain delinquent payments of principal and interest, (3) maintain and administer any hazard, title or primary mortgage insurance policies relating to the mortgage loans, (4) maintain any required escrow accounts for payment of taxes and insurance and administer escrow payments, and (5) foreclose on defaulted mortgage loans or, to the extent consistent with the documents governing a securitization, consider alternatives to foreclosure, such as loan modifications or short sales. As master servicer, our primary duties are typically to (1) supervise, monitor and oversee the servicing of the mortgage loans by the servicer, (2) consult with each servicer and use reasonable efforts to cause the servicer to observe its servicing obligations, (3) prepare monthly distribution statements to security holders and, if required by the securitization documents, certain periodic reports required to be filed with the SEC, (4) if required by the securitization documents, calculate distributions and loss allocations on the mortgage-backed securities, (5) prepare tax and information returns of the securitization trust, and (6) advance amounts required by non-affiliated servicers who fail to perform their advancing obligations.
Each agreement under which we act as servicer or master servicer generally specifies a standard of responsibility for actions taken by us in such capacity and provides protection against expenses and liabilities incurred by us when acting in compliance with the specified standard. For example, most private label securitization agreements and under which we act as servicer or master servicer typically provide that the servicer and the master servicer are entitled to indemnification by the securitization trust for taking action or refraining from taking action in good faith or for errors in judgment. However, we are not indemnified, but rather are required to indemnify the securitization trustee, against any failure by us, as servicer or master servicer, to perform our servicing obligations or any of our acts or omissions which involve willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of, or reckless disregard of, our duties. In addition, if we commit a material breach of our obligations as servicer or master servicer, we may be subject to termination if the breach is not cured within a specified period following notice, which can generally be given by the securitization trustee or a specified percentage of security holders. Whole loan sale contracts under which we act as servicer generally include similar provisions with respect to our actions as servicer. The standards governing servicing in GSE-guaranteed securitizations, and the possible remedies for violations of such standards, vary, and those standards and remedies are determined by servicing guides maintained by the GSEs, contracts between the GSEs and individual

41


servicers and topical guides published by the GSEs from time to time. Such remedies could include indemnification or repurchase of an affected mortgage loan.
In recent weeks, there have been numerous press reports concerning possible deficiencies in the processes by which mortgage loan servicers, including servicers of securitized loans, conduct foreclosure proceedings. The principal issues cited concern improper preparation or signing of affidavits required to be delivered in the 23 judicial foreclosure states. As a consequence of these reports, the Attorneys General of all 50 states have announced an inquiry into foreclosure practices. In addition, several Attorneys General and various legislators have publicly called on servicers to impose a foreclosure moratorium or suspension while foreclosure issues are addressed and several large servicers have announced temporary suspensions of foreclosure actions. For additional information see Note 10 (Guarantees and Legal Actions) to Financial Statements in this Report.
We believe we have designed an appropriate process for generating foreclosure affidavits and documentation for both foreclosures and mortgage securitizations. In light of industry concerns relating to foreclosure procedures, we implemented additional reviews on pending foreclosures to help assure our borrowers and others that foreclosure proceedings are completed appropriately. Although we have identified instances where final steps relating to the execution of foreclosure affidavits (including a final review of the affidavit, as well as some aspects of the notarization process) were not strictly adhered to, we do not believe that any of these instances related to the quality of the customer and loan data or led to foreclosures which should not have otherwise occurred. Accordingly, we do not plan on instituting a moratorium on foreclosure sales. Nevertheless, out of an abundance of caution and to provide an additional level of assurance regarding our processes, we recently announced that we are submitting supplemental affidavits for approximately 55,000 foreclosures pending before courts in 23 judicial foreclosure states.
If our review causes us to re-execute or redeliver any documents in connection with foreclosures, we will incur costs which may not be legally or practically reimbursable to us to the extent they relate to securitized mortgage loans. Further, if the validity of any foreclosure action is challenged by a borrower, whether successfully or not, we may incur significant litigation costs, which may not be reimbursable to us to the extent they relate to securitized mortgage loans. In addition, if a court were to overturn a foreclosure due to errors or deficiencies in the foreclosure process, we could have liability to a title insurer that insured the title to the property sold in foreclosure. Any such liability may not be reimbursable to us to the extent it relates to a securitized mortgage loan.
Recent press reports have also contained speculation that foreclosures of securitized mortgage loans could be impaired or delayed due to the manner in which the loans are assigned to the securitization trusts. One cited concern is that securitization loan files may be lacking mortgage notes, assignments or other critical documents required to be produced on behalf of the trust. Although we believe that we delivered all documents in accordance with the requirements of each securitization involving our mortgage loans, if any required document with respect to a securitized mortgage loan sold by us is missing or defective, as discussed above we would be obligated to cure the defect or to repurchase the loan.
In addition to speculation about defective mortgage documents, some commentators have suggested that the common industry practice of recording a mortgage in the name of Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS) creates issues regarding whether a securitization trust has good title to the mortgage loan. MERS is a company that acts as mortgagee of record and as agent for the owner of the related mortgage note. When mortgage notes are assigned, such as between an originator and a securitization trust, the change of ownership is recorded electronically on a register maintained by MERS, which then acts as agent for the new owner. The purpose of MERS is to save borrowers and

42


lenders from having to record assignments of mortgages in county land offices each time ownership of the mortgage note is assigned. Although MERS has been in existence and used for many years, it is now suggested by some commentators that having a mortgagee of record that is different than the owner of the mortgage note “breaks the chain of title” and clouds the ownership of the loan. We do not believe that to be the case, and believe that the operative legal principle is that the ownership of a mortgage follows the ownership of the mortgage note, and that a securitization trust should have good title to a mortgage loan if the note is endorsed and delivered to it, regardless of whether MERS is the mortgagee of record or whether an assignment of mortgage is recorded to the trust. However, in order to foreclose on the mortgage loan, it may be necessary for an assignment of the mortgage to be completed by MERS to the trust, in order to comply with state law requirements governing foreclosure. A delay by a servicer in processing any related assignment of mortgage to the trust could delay foreclosure, with adverse effects to security holders and potential for servicer liability. Our practice is to obtain assignments of mortgages from MERS prior to instituting foreclosure.
ASSET/LIABILITY MANAGEMENT
Asset/liability management involves the evaluation, monitoring and management of interest rate risk, market risk, liquidity and funding. The Corporate Asset/Liability Management Committee (Corporate ALCO) — which oversees these risks and reports periodically to the Finance Committee of the Board of Directors (Board) — consists of senior financial and business executives. Each of our principal business groups has its own asset/liability management committee and process linked to the Corporate ALCO process.
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk, which potentially can have a significant earnings impact, is an integral part of being a financial intermediary. We assess interest rate risk by comparing our most likely earnings plan with various earnings simulations using many interest rate scenarios that differ in the direction of interest rate changes, the degree of change over time, the speed of change and the projected shape of the yield curve. For example, as of JuneSeptember 30, 2010, our most recent simulation indicated estimated earnings at risk of approximately 1.5%2.5% of our most likely earnings plan over the next 12 months using a scenario in which the federal funds rate rises to 4.25%3.75% and the 10-year Constant Maturity Treasury bond yield rises to 5.00%. Simulation estimates depend on, and will change with, the size and mix of our actual and projected balance sheet at the time of each simulation. Due to timing differences between the quarterly valuation of MSRs and the eventual impact of interest rates on mortgage banking volumes, earnings at risk in any particular quarter could be higher than the average earnings at risk over the 12-month simulation period, depending on the path of interest rates and on our hedging strategies for MSRs. See the “Risk Management — Mortgage Banking Interest Rate and Market Risk” section in this Report for more information.
We use exchange-traded and over-the-counter (OTC) interest rate derivatives to hedge our interest rate exposures. The notional or contractual amount, credit risk amount and estimated net fair value of these derivatives as of JuneSeptember 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, are presented in Note 11 (Derivatives) to Financial Statements in this Report.
For additional information regarding interest rate risk, see pages 66-67 of our 2009 Form 10-K.

4143


Mortgage Banking Interest Rate and Market Risk
We originate, fund and service mortgage loans, which subjects us to various risks, including credit, liquidity and interest rate risks. For a discussion of mortgage banking interest rate and market risk, see pages 67-69 of our 2009 Form 10-K.
In secondthird quarter 2010, a $2.7$1.1 billion decrease in the fair value of our MSRs and $3.3$1.2 billion gain on free-standing derivatives used to hedge the MSRs resulted in a net gain of $626$56 million. This net gain was largely due to hedge-carry income which reflected the low short-term interest rate environment. The net gain on the MSRMSRs of $56 million in third quarter 2010 was down from $626 million in second quarter 2010 was down from $989 million in first quarter 2010 and $1.0$1.5 billion a year ago, due to a change in the composition of the hedge and a hedge position that considered natural business offsets.
While our hedging activities are designed to balance our mortgage banking interest rate risks, the financial instruments we use may not perfectly correlate with the values and income being hedged. For example, the change in the value of adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs) production held for sale from changes in mortgage interest rates may or may not be fully offset by Treasury and LIBOR index-based financial instruments used as economic hedges for such ARMs. Additionally, the hedge-carry income we earn on our economic hedges for the MSRs may not continue if the spread between short-term and long-term rates decreases, we shift the composition of the hedge to more interest rate swaps, or there are other changes in the market for mortgage forwards that impact the implied carry.
For additional information regarding other risk factors related to the mortgage business, see pages 67-69 of our 2009 Form 10-K.
The total carrying value of our residential and commercial MSRs was $14.3$13.5 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, and $17.1 billion at December 31, 2009. The weighted-average note rate on our portfolio of loans serviced for others was 5.53%5.46% at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, and 5.66% at December 31, 2009. Our total MSRs were 0.76%0.72% of mortgage loans serviced for others at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, compared with 0.91% at December 31, 2009.

42


Market Risk — Trading Activities
From a market risk perspective, our net income is exposed to changes in interest rates, credit spreads, foreign exchange rates, equity and commodity prices and their implied volatilities. The credit risk amount and estimated net fair value of all customer accommodation derivatives are included in Note 11 (Derivatives) to Financial Statements in this Report. Open, “at risk” positions for all trading businesses are monitored by Corporate ALCO.
The standardized approach for monitoring and reporting market risk for the trading activities consists of value-at-risk (VaR) metrics complemented with factor analysis and stress testing. VaR measures the worst expected loss over a given time interval and within a given confidence interval. We measure and report daily VaR at a 99% confidence interval based on actual changes in rates and prices over the past 250 trading days. The analysis captures all financial instruments that are considered trading positions. The average one-day VaR throughout secondthird quarter 2010 was $30$31 million, with a lower bound of $24$23 million and an upper bound of $40$43 million. For additional information regarding market risk related to trading activities, see page 69 of our 2009 Form 10-K.
Market Risk — Equity Markets
We are directly and indirectly affected by changes in the equity markets. For additional information regarding market risk related to equity markets, see page 69 of our 2009 Form 10-K.

44


The following table provides information regarding our marketable and nonmarketable equity investments.
                
 
 June 30 Dec. 31 Sept. 30, Dec. 31,
(in millions) 2010 2009  2010 2009 
   
Nonmarketable equity investments:  
Private equity investments:  
Cost method $3,769 3,808  $2,995 3,808 
Equity method 6,144 5,138  7,234 5,138 
Federal bank stock 6,024 5,985  5,511 5,985 
Principal investments 360 1,423  345 1,423 
   
Total nonmarketable equity investments (1) $16,297 16,354  $16,085 16,354 
   
Marketable equity securities:  
Cost $4,571 4,749  $4,381 4,749 
Net unrealized gains 592 843  895 843 
 
Total marketable equity securities (2) $5,163 5,592  $5,276 5,592 
   
   
(1) Included in other assets on the balance sheet. See Note 6 (Other Assets) to Financial Statements in this Report for additional information.
(2) Included in securities available for sale. See Note 4 (Securities Available for Sale) to Financial Statements in this Report for additional information.

43


Liquidity and Funding
The objective of effective liquidity management is to ensure that we can meet customer loan requests, customer deposit maturities/withdrawals and other cash commitments efficiently under both normal operating conditions and under unpredictable circumstances of industry or market stress. To achieve this objective, Corporate ALCO establishes and monitors liquidity guidelines that require sufficient asset-based liquidity to cover potential funding requirements and to avoid over-dependence on volatile, less reliable funding markets. We set these guidelines for both the consolidated balance sheet and for the Parent to ensure that the Parent is a source of strength for its regulated, deposit-taking banking subsidiaries.
Debt securities in the securities available-for-sale portfolio provide asset liquidity, in addition to the immediately liquid resources of cash and due from banks and federal funds sold, securities purchased under resale agreements and other short-term investments. Asset liquidity is further enhanced by our ability to sell or securitize loans in secondary markets and to pledge loans to access secured borrowing facilities through the Federal Home Loan Banks the FRB, or the U.S. Treasury.Federal Reserve Bank.
Core customer deposits have historically provided a sizeable source of relatively stable and low-cost funds. At JuneSeptember 30, 2010, core deposits funded 99%102% of the Company’s loan portfolio. Additional funding is provided by long-term debt (including trust preferred securities), other foreign deposits and short-term borrowings.

45


The following table shows selected information for short-term borrowings, (federal funds purchased, securities sold under repurchase agreements, commercial paper and other short-term borrowings).which generally mature in less than 30 days.
                 
 
  Quarter ended  Year ended 
  Sept. 30, June 30, Mar. 31, Dec. 31,
(in millions) 2010  2010  2010  2009 
  
Balance, period end
                
Commercial paper and other short-term borrowings $16,856   16,604   17,646   12,950 
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase  33,859   28,583   28,687   26,016 
  
Total $50,715   45,187   46,333   38,966 
  
Average daily balance for period
                
Commercial paper and other short-term borrowings $15,761   16,316   16,885   27,793 
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase  30,707   28,766   28,196   24,179 
  
Total $46,468   45,082   45,081   51,972 
  
Maximum month-end balance for period
                
Commercial paper and other short-term borrowings (1) $16,856   17,388   17,646   62,871 
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase (2)  33,859   28,807   29,270   30,608 
  
(1)The maximum month-end balance was in September 2010, April 2010, March 2010 and February 2009.
(2)The maximum month-end balance was in September 2010, May 2010, February 2010 and February 2009.
Liquidity is also available through our ability to raise funds in a variety of domestic and international money and capital markets. We access capital markets for long-term funding through issuances of registered debt securities, private placements and asset-backed secured funding. Investors in the long-term capital markets generally will consider, among other factors, a company’s credit rating in making investment decisions. Rating agencies base their ratings on many quantitative and qualitative factors, including capital adequacy, liquidity, asset quality, business mix, the level and quality of earnings, and rating agency assumptions regarding the probability and extent of Federal financial assistance or support for certain large financial institutions. Adverse changes in these factors could result in a reduction of our credit ratings; however, a reduction in our credit ratings would not cause us to violate any of our debt covenants. See the “Risk Factors” section of this Reportour First Quarter Form 10-Q and our FirstSecond Quarter Form 10-Q for additional information regarding recent legislative developments and our credit ratings.
We continue to evaluate the potential impact on liquidity management of regulatory proposals, including Basel III and regulations required under the Dodd-Frank Act, as they move closer to the final rule-making process.
Parent. Under SEC rules, the Parent is classified as a “well-known seasoned issuer,” which allows it to file a registration statement that does not have a limit on issuance capacity. “Well-known seasoned issuers” generally include those companies with a public float of common equity of at least $700 million or those companies that have issued at least $1 billion in aggregate principal amount of non-convertible securities, other than common equity, in the last three years. In June 2009, the Parent filed a registration statement with the SEC for the issuance of senior and subordinated notes, preferred stock and other securities. The Parent’s ability to issue debt and other securities under this registration statement is limited by the debt issuance authority granted by the Board. The Parent is currently authorized by the Board to issue $60 billion in outstanding short-term debt and $170 billion in outstanding long-term debt.
At JuneSeptember 30, 2010, the Parent had outstanding short-term debt of $10.2$10.4 billion and long-term debt of $110.2$102.5 billion under these authorities. During the first halfnine months of 2010, the Parent issued a total of $1.3 billion in non-guaranteed registered senior notes. Effective August 2009,

46


The following table provides information regarding the Parent established an SEC registered $25 billionParent’s medium-term note program series I and J (MTN — I&J), under which it(MTN) programs. The Parent may issue senior and subordinated debt securities. Also, effective April 2010,securities under Series I & J, and the European and Australian programmes. Under Series K, the Parent established an SEC registered $25 billion medium-term note program series K (MTN — K), under which it may issue senior

44


debt securities linked to one or more indices. In December 2009, the Parent established a $25 billion European medium-term note programme (EMTN), under which it may issue senior and subordinated debt securities. In March 2010, the Parent increased its Australian medium-term note programme (AMTN) from A$5 billion to A$10 billion, under which it may issue senior and subordinated debt securities. The EMTN and AMTN securities are not registered with the SEC and may not be offered in the United States without applicable exemptions from registration. The Parent has $21.8 billion, $25.0 billion, $25.0 billion, and A$6.8 billion available for issuance under the MTN - I&J, MTN - K, EMTN and AMTN, respectively.
             
 
      September 30, 2010 
      Debt    
  Date  issuance  Available for 
(in billions) established  authority  issuance 
  
MTN program:            
Series I & J (1)  August 2009  $25.0   21.8 
Series K (1)  April 2010   25.0   24.9 
European (2)  December 2009   25.0   25.0 
Australian (2)(3)  June 2005   10.0   6.8 
  
(1)SEC registered.
(2)Not registered with the SEC. May not be offered in the United States without applicable exemptions from registration. The Australian MTN amounts are presented in Australian dollars.
(3)As amended in October 2005 and March 2010.
The proceeds from securities issued in the first halfnine months of 2010 were used for general corporate purposes, and we expect the proceeds from securities issued in the future will also be used for general corporate purposes. The Parent also issues commercial paper from time to time, subject to its short-term debt limit.
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. is authorized by its board of directors to issue $100 billion in outstanding short-term debt and $125 billion in outstanding long-term debt. In December 2007, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. established a $100 billion bank note program under which, subject to any other debt outstanding under the limits described above, it may issue $50 billion in outstanding short-term senior notes and $50 billion in long-term senior or subordinated notes. At JuneSeptember 30, 2010, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. had remaining issuance capacity on the bank note program of $50 billion in short-term senior notes and $50 billion in long-term senior or subordinated notes. Securities are issued under this program as private placements in accordance with Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) regulations. Effective March 20, 2010, Wachovia Bank, N.A. merged with and into Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Wells Fargo Financial. In January 2010, Wells Fargo Financial Canada Corporation (WFFCC), an indirect wholly owned Canadian subsidiary of the Parent, qualified with the Canadian provincial securities commissions CAD$7.0 billion in medium-term notes for distribution from time to time in Canada. At JuneSeptember 30, 2010, CAD$7.0 billion remained available for future issuance. All medium-term notes issued by WFFCC are unconditionally guaranteed by the Parent.
Federal Home Loan Bank Membership
We are a member of the Federal Home Loan Banks based in Dallas, Des Moines and San Francisco (collectively, the FHLBs). Each member of each of the FHLBs is required to maintain a minimum investment in capital stock of the applicable FHLB. The board of directors of each FHLB can increase the minimum investment requirements in the event it has concluded that additional capital is required to allow it to meet its own regulatory capital requirements. Any increase in the minimum investment requirements outside of specified ranges requires the approval of the Federal Housing Finance Board. Because the extent of any obligation to increase our investment in any of the FHLBs depends entirely upon the occurrence of a future event, potential future payments to the FHLBs are not determinable.

47


CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
We have an active program for managing stockholders’ equity and regulatory capital and we maintain a comprehensive process for assessing the Company’s overall capital adequacy. We generate capital internally primarily through the retention of earnings net of dividends. Our objective is to maintain capital levels at the Company and its bank subsidiaries above the regulatory “well-capitalized” thresholds by an amount commensurate with our risk profile. Our potential sources of stockholders’ equity include retained earnings and issuances of common and preferred stock. Retained earnings increased $4.6$7.4 billion from December 31, 2009, predominantly from Wells Fargo net income of $5.6$8.9 billion, less common and preferred dividends of $889 million.$1.3 billion. During the first halfnine months of 2010, we issued approximately 5568 million shares of common stock, with net proceeds of $865 million,$1.1 billion, including 1823 million shares during the period

45


under various employee benefit (including our employee stock option plan) and director plans, as well as under our dividend reinvestment and direct stock purchase programs.
On April 29, 2010, following stockholder approval, the Company amended its certificate of incorporation to provide for an increase in the number of shares of the Company’s common stock authorized for issuance from 6 billion to 9 billion.
From time to time the Board authorizes the Company to repurchase shares of our common stock. Although we announce when the Board authorizes share repurchases, we typically do not give any public notice before we repurchase our shares. Various factors determine the amount and timing of our share repurchases, including our capital requirements, the number of shares we expect to issue for acquisitions and employee benefit plans, market conditions (including the trading price of our stock), and regulatory and legal considerations. The FRB published clarifying supervisory guidance in first quarter 2009,SR 09-4 Applying Supervisory Guidance and Regulations on the Payment of Dividends, Stock Redemptions, and Stock Repurchases at Bank Holding Companies,pertaining to the FRB’s criteria, assessment and approval process for reductions in capital. As with all 19 participants in the FRB’s Supervisory Capital Assessment Program, under this supervisory letter, before repurchasing our common shares, we must consult with the FRB staff and demonstrate that the proposed actions are consistent with the existing supervisory guidance, including demonstrating that our internal capital assessment process is consistent with the complexity of our activities and risk profile. In 2008, the Board authorized the repurchase of up to 25 million additional shares of our outstanding common stock. During second quarterthe first nine months of 2010, we repurchased 12 million shares of our common stock, all from our employee benefit plans. At JuneSeptember 30, 2010, the total remaining common stock repurchase authority was approximately 4 million shares.
Historically, our policy has been to repurchase shares under the “safe harbor” conditions of Rule 10b-18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 including a limitation on the daily volume of repurchases. Rule 10b-18 imposes an additional daily volume limitation on share repurchases during a pending merger or acquisition in which shares of our stock will constitute some or all of the consideration. Our management may determine that during a pending stock merger or acquisition when the safe harbor would otherwise be available, it is in our best interest to repurchase shares in excess of this additional daily volume limitation. In such cases, we intend to repurchase shares in compliance with the other conditions of the safe harbor, including the standing daily volume limitation that applies whether or not there is a pending stock merger or acquisition.
In connection with our participation in the Troubled Asset Relief Program Capital Purchase Program, we issued to the U.S. Treasury Department warrants to purchase 110,261,688 shares of our common stock with an exercise price of $34.01 per share. On May 26, 2010, in an auction by the U.S. Treasury, we purchased 70,165,963 of the warrants at a price of $7.70 per warrant. The Board has authorized the repurchase of up to $1 billion of the warrants, including the warrants purchased in the auction. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2010, $460$456 million of that authority remained. Depending on market conditions, we may repurchase from time to time additional warrants and/or our outstanding debt securities in privately negotiated or open market transactions, by tender offer or otherwise.

48


The Company and each of our subsidiary banks are subject to various regulatory capital adequacy requirements administered by the FRB and the OCC. Risk-based capital (RBC) guidelines establish a risk-adjusted ratio relating capital to different categories of assets and off-balance sheet exposures. At JuneSeptember 30, 2010, the Company and each of our subsidiary banks were “well capitalized” under applicable regulatory capital adequacy guidelines. See Note 18 (Regulatory and Agency Capital Requirements) to Financial Statements in this Report for additional information.

46


Current regulatory RBC rules are based primarily on broad credit-risk considerations and limited market-related risks, but do not take into account other types of risk a financial company may be exposed to. Our capital adequacy assessment process contemplates a wide range of risks that the Company is exposed to and also takes into consideration our performance under a variety of economic conditions, as well as regulatory expectations and guidance, rating agency viewpoints and the view of capital market participants. While Basel III requirements are not final, we continue to evaluate the potential impact and expect to be above a 7% Tier 1 common equity ratio within the next few quarters calculated pursuant to our interpretation of the currently proposed Basel III capital requirements.
At JuneSeptember 30, 2010, stockholders’ equity and Tier 1 common equity levels were higher than the quarter ending prior to the Wachovia acquisition. During 2009, as regulators and the market focused on the composition of regulatory capital, the Tier 1 common equity ratio gained significant prominence as a metric of capital strength. There is no mandated minimum or “well capitalized” standard for Tier 1 common equity; instead the RBC rules state voting common stockholders’ equity should be the dominant element within Tier 1 common equity. Tier 1 common equity was $73.9$77.6 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, or 7.61%8.01% of risk-weighted assets, an increase of $8.4$12.1 billion from December 31, 2009.
The following table provides the details of the Tier 1 common equity calculation.
TIER 1 COMMON EQUITY (1)
                      
 
 June 30 Dec. 31 Sept. 30, Dec. 31,
(in billions)(in billions) 2010 2009  2010 2009 
   
Total equityTotal equity   $121.4   114.4    $125.2 114.4 
Less: Noncontrolling interests    (1.6)  (2.6)
Noncontrolling interests    (1.5)  (2.6)
   
Total Wells Fargo stockholders’ equityTotal Wells Fargo stockholders’ equity    119.8   111.8    123.7 111.8 
   
Less: Preferred equity    (8.1)  (8.1)
Adjustments:   
Preferred equity    (8.1)  (8.1)
Goodwill and intangible assets (other than MSRs)    (36.1)  (37.7)
Applicable deferred taxes   4.7 5.3 
Deferred tax asset limitation     (1.0)
MSRs over specified limitations    (0.9)  (1.6)
Cumulative other comprehensive income    (5.4)  (3.0)
Other    (0.3)  (0.2)
 Goodwill and intangible assets (other than MSRs)    (36.7)  (37.7)  
 Applicable deferred taxes    5.0   5.3 
 Deferred tax asset limitation       (1.0)
 MSRs over specified limitations    (1.0)  (1.6)
 Cumulative other comprehensive income    (4.8)  (3.0)
 Other    (0.3)  (0.2)
 
 Tier 1 common equity (A) $73.9   65.5 
Tier 1 common equity (A) $77.6 65.5 
   
Total risk-weighted assets (2)Total risk-weighted assets (2) (B) $970.8   1,013.6  (B) $968.4 1,013.6 
   
Tier 1 common equity to total risk-weighted assetsTier 1 common equity to total risk-weighted assets (A)/(B)  7.61%  6.46  (A)/(B)  8.01% 6.46 
   
   
(1) Tier 1 common equity is a non-generally accepted accounting principle (GAAP) financial measure that is used by investors, analysts and bank regulatory agencies, to assess the capital position of financial services companies. Tier 1 common equity includes total Wells Fargo stockholders’ equity, less preferred equity, goodwill and intangible assets (excluding MSRs), net of related deferred taxes, adjusted for specified Tier 1 regulatory capital limitations covering deferred taxes, MSRs, and cumulative other comprehensive income. Management reviews Tier 1 common equity along with other measures of capital as part of its financial analyses and has included this non-GAAP financial information, and the corresponding reconciliation to total equity, because of current interest in such information on the part of market participants.
(2) Under the regulatory guidelines for risk-based capital, on-balance sheet assets and credit equivalent amounts of derivatives and off-balance sheet items are assigned to one of several broad risk categories according to the obligor or, if relevant, the guarantor or the nature of any collateral. The aggregate dollar amount in each risk category is then multiplied by the risk weight associated with that category. The resulting weighted values from each of the risk categories are aggregated for determining total risk-weighted assets.

4749


CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our significant accounting policies (see Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in this Report) are fundamental to understanding our results of operations and financial condition, because they require that we use estimates and assumptions that may affect the value of our assets or liabilities and financial results. Six of these policies are critical because they require management to make difficult, subjective and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and because it is likely that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. These policies govern:
 the allowance for credit losses;
 purchased credit-impaired (PCI) loans;
 the valuation of residential mortgage servicing rights (MSRs);
 the fair valuation of financial instruments;
 pension accounting; and
 income taxes.
Management has reviewed and approved these critical accounting policies and has discussed these policies with the Audit and Examination Committee of the Company’s Board. These policies are described in the “Financial Review — Critical Accounting Policies” section and Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in our 2009 Form 10-K.
FAIR VALUATION OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
We use fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain financial instruments and to determine fair value disclosures. See our 2009 Form 10-K for the complete critical accounting policy related to fair valuation of financial instruments.
For the securities available-for-sale portfolio, we typically use independent pricing services and brokers to obtain fair value based upon quoted prices. We determine the most appropriate and relevant pricing service for each security class and generally obtain one quoted price for each security. For securities in our trading portfolio, we typically use prices developed internally by our traders to measure the security at fair value. Internal traders base their prices upon their knowledge of current market information for the particular security class being valued. Current market information includes recent transaction prices for the same or similar securities, liquidity conditions, relevant benchmark indices and other market data. For both trading and available-for-sale securities, we validate prices using a variety of methods, including but not limited to, comparison to pricing services, corroboration of pricing by reference to other independent market data such as secondary broker quotes and relevant benchmark indices and, for securities valued using external pricing services or brokers, review of pricing by Company personnel familiar with market liquidity and other market-related conditions. We believe the determination of fair value for our securities is consistent with the accounting guidance on fair value measurements.

48


The following table below presents the summary of the fair value of financial instruments recorded at fair value on a recurring basis, and the amounts measured using significant Level 3 inputs (before derivative netting adjustments). The fair value of the remaining assets and liabilities were measured using valuation methodologies involving market-based or market-derived information, collectively Level 1 and 2 measurements.

50


                                
 
 June 30, 2010 December 31, 2009  September 30, 2010 December 31, 2009 
 Total Total    Total Total   
($ in billions) balance Level 3 (1) balance Level 3 (1)  balance Level 3 (1) balance Level 3 (1) 
   
Assets carried at fair value $260.4 47.2 277.4 52.0  $288.6 48.6 277.4 52.0 
As a percentage of total assets  21% 4 22 4   24% 4 22 4 
Liabilities carried at fair value $21.8 8.2 22.8 7.9  $18.9 7.7 22.8 7.9 
As a percentage of total liabilities  2% 1 2 1   2% 1 2 1 
   
(1) Before derivative netting adjustments.
See Note 12 (Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities) to Financial Statements in this Report for a complete discussion on our use of fair valuation of financial instruments, our related measurement techniques and its impact to our financial statements.

49


Current Accounting DevelopmentsCURRENT ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS
The following accounting pronouncements havepronouncement has been issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, but areis not yet effective:
 Accounting Standards Update (ASU or Update) 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses;
ASU 2010-18, Effect of a Loan Modification When the Loan is Part of a Pool That is Accounted for as a Single Asset; and
ASU 2010-11, Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives..
ASU 2010-20 requires enhanced disclosures for the allowance for credit losses and financing receivables, which include certain loans and long-term accounts receivable. Companies will be required to disaggregate credit quality information, including receivables on nonaccrual status and aging of past due receivables by class of financing receivable, and the roll forward of the allowance for credit losses by portfolio segment or class of financing receivable.segment. Portfolio segment is the level at which an entity evaluates credit riskdevelops and determinesdocuments a systematic method to determine its allowance for credit losses, and classlosses. Class of financing receivable is generally a lower leveldisaggregation of portfolio segment. CompaniesThis guidance is effective for us in fourth quarter 2010 with prospective application. Additionally, companies must also provide more granular information on the nature and extent of TDRs and their effect on the allowance for credit losses. This guidance islosses effective for us in fourthfirst quarter 2010 with prospective application.2011. Our adoption of the Update will not affect our consolidated financial statement results since it amends only the disclosure requirements for financing receivables and the allowance for credit losses.
ASU 2010-18 provides guidance for modified PCI loans that are accounted for within a pool. Under the new guidance, modified PCI loans should not be removed from a pool even if those loans would otherwise be deemed troubled debt restructurings. The Update also clarifies that entities should consider the impact of modifications on a pool of PCI loans when evaluating that pool for impairment. These accounting changes are effective for us in third quarter 2010 with early adoption permitted. Our adoption of the Update will not affect our consolidated financial statement results, as the new guidance is consistent with our current accounting practice.
ASU 2010-11 provides guidance clarifying when entities should evaluate embedded credit derivative features in financial instruments issued from structures such as collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) and synthetic CDOs. The Update clarifies that bifurcation and separate accounting is not required for embedded credit derivative features that are only related to the transfer of credit risk that occurs when one financial instrument is subordinate to another. Embedded derivatives related to other types of credit risk must be analyzed to determine the appropriate accounting treatment. The guidance also allows companies to elect fair value option upon adoption for any investment in a beneficial interest in securitized financial assets. By making this election, companies would not be required to evaluate whether embedded credit derivative features exist for those interests. This guidance is effective for us in third quarter 2010. Our adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.

50


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements can be identified by words such as “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “seeks,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “projects,” “outlook,” “forecast,” “will,” “may,” “could,” “should,” “can” and similar references to future periods. Examples of forward-looking statements in this Report include, but are not limited to, statements we make about: (i) future results of the Company; (ii) future credit quality and expectations regarding future loan losses in our loan portfolios and life-of-loan estimates, including our belief that credit quality has turned the corner and quarterly provision expense and quarterly total credit losses have peaked, and that the positive trend in credit quality is expected to continue over the coming year;estimates; the level and loss content of nonperforming assetsNPAs and nonaccrual loans; the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, including our current expectation of future reductions in the allowance for loan losses; and the reduction or mitigation of risk in our loan portfolios and the effects of loan modification programs; (iii) future capital levels and our expectation that we will be above a 7% Tier 1 common equity ratio under proposed Basel capital regulations within the next few quarters; (iv) our mortgage repurchase exposure and exposure relating to our foreclosure practices; (v) the merger integration of the Company and Wachovia, including expense savings, merger costs and revenue synergies; (iv)(vi) the expected outcome and impact of legal, regulatory and legislative developments; and (v)(vii) the Company’s plans, objectives and strategies.

51


Forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and assumptions regarding our business, the economy and other future conditions. Because forward-looking statements relate to the future, they are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. Our actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements. We caution you, therefore, against relying on any of these forward-looking statements. They are neither statements of historical fact nor guarantees or assurances of future performance. While there is no assurance that any list of risks and uncertainties or risk factors is complete, important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include the following, without limitation:
 current and future economic and market conditions, including the effects of further declines in housing prices and high unemployment rates;
the terms of capital investments or other financial assistance provided by the U.S. government;
 our capital requirements and the ability to raise capital on favorable terms, including regulatory capital standards as determined by applicable regulatory authorities;
 financial services reform and other current, pending or future legislation or regulation that could have a negative effect on our revenue and businesses, including the Dodd-Frank Act and legislation and regulation relating to overdraft fees (and changes to our overdraft practices as a result thereof), credit cards, and other bank services;
 legislative proposals to allow mortgage cram-downs in bankruptcy or require other loan modifications;
 the extent of our success in our loan modification efforts, as well as the effects of regulatory requirements or guidance regarding loan modifications or changes in such requirements or guidance;
 the amount of mortgage loan repurchase demands that we receive and our ability to satisfy any such demands without having to repurchase loans related thereto or otherwise indemnify or reimburse third parties;
negative effects relating to mortgage foreclosures, including changes in our procedures or practices and/or industry standards or practices, regulatory or judicial requirements, penalties or fines, increased costs, or delays or moratoriums on foreclosures;
our ability to successfully integrate the Wachovia merger and realize the expected cost savings and other benefits and the effects of any delays or disruptions in systems conversions relating to the Wachovia integration;
 our ability to realize the efficiency initiatives to lower expenses when and in the amount expected;
 recognition of OTTI on securities held in our available-for-sale portfolio;
 the effect of changes in interest rates on our net interest margin and our mortgage originations, mortgage servicing rightsMSRs and mortgages held for sale;
 hedging gains or losses;
 disruptions in the capital markets and reduced investor demand for mortgage loans;

51


 our ability to sell more products to our customers;
 the effect of the economic recession on the demand for our products and services;
 the effect of the fall in stock market prices on our investment banking business and our fee income from our brokerage, asset and wealth management businesses;
 our election to provide support to our mutual funds for structured credit products they may hold;
 changes in the value of our venture capital investments;
 changes in our accounting policies or in accounting standards or in how accounting standards are to be applied or interpreted;
 mergers, acquisitions and divestitures;
 changes in the Company’s credit ratings and changes in the credit quality of the Company’s customers or counterparties;

52


 reputational damage from negative publicity, fines, penalties and other negative consequences from regulatory violations and legal actions;
 the loss of checking and savingsavings account deposits to other investments such as the stock market, and the resulting increase in our funding costs and impact on our net interest margin;
 fiscal and monetary policies of the Federal Reserve Board; and
 the other risk factors and uncertainties described under “Risk Factors” in our 2009 Form 10-K, and First Quarter Form 10-Q, Second Quarter Form 10-Q and under “Risk Factors” in this Report.
In addition to the above factors, we also caution that there is no assurance that our allowance for credit losses will be adequate to cover future credit losses, especially if credit markets, housing prices and unemployment do not continue to stabilize or improve. Increases in loan charge-offs or in the allowance for credit losses and related provision expense could materially adversely affect our financial results and condition.
Any forward-looking statement made by us in this Report speaks only as of the date on which it is made. Factors or events that could cause our actual results to differ may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of them. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as may be required by law.
RISK FACTORS
An investment in the Company involves risk, including the possibility that the value of the investment could fall substantially and that dividends or other distributions on the investment could be reduced or eliminated. We discuss above under “Forward-Looking Statements” and elsewhere in this Report, as well as in other documents we file with the SEC, risk factors that could adversely affect our financial results and condition and the value of, and return on, an investment in the Company. We refer you to the Financial Review section and Financial Statements (and related Notes) in this Report for more information about credit, interest rate, market and litigation risks, the “Risk Factors” and “Regulation and Supervision” sections in our 2009 Form 10-K, the “Risk Factors” section in our First Quarter Form 10-Q and Second Quarter Form 10-Q, and the “Forward-Looking Statements” section of this Report for a discussion of risk factors.
The following risk factor supplements the risk factors set forth in our 2009 Form 10-K, First Quarter Form 10-Q and FirstSecond Quarter Form 10-Q and should be read in conjunction with the other risk factors described in those reports and in this Report.

52


Enacted legislationWe may be terminated as a servicer or master servicer, be required to repurchase a mortgage loan or reimburse investors for credit losses on a mortgage loan, or incur costs and regulation, including the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, could require usother liabilities if we fail to change certain ofsatisfy our business practices, reduce our revenue, impose additional costs on us or otherwise adversely affect our business operations and/or competitive position.
Economic, financial, market and political conditions during the past few years have led to new legislation and regulation in the United States and in other jurisdictions outside of the United States where we conduct business. These laws and regulations may affect the manner in which we do business and the products and services that we provide, affect or restrict our ability to compete in our current businesses or our ability to enter into or acquire new businesses, reduce or limit our revenue in businesses or impose additional fees, assessments or taxes on us, intensify the regulatory supervision of us and the financial services industry, and adversely affect our business operations or have other negative consequences.
For example, in 2009 several legislative and regulatory initiatives were adopted that will have an impact on our businesses and financial results, including FRB amendments to Regulation E, which, among other things, affect the way we may charge overdraft fees beginning on July 1, 2010, and the enactment of the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 (the Card Act), which, among other things, affects our ability to change interest rates and assess certain fees on card accounts. We currently estimate that the Regulation E amendments,servicing obligations, including our implementation of certain policy changes to our overdraft practices, will reduce our 2010 fee revenue by approximately $225 million (after-tax) in third quarter 2010 and $275 million (after-tax) in fourth quarter 2010. We currently estimate that implementation of the Card Act regulations will have a net impact of $30 million (after-tax) in third quarter 2010. The actual impact of the Regulation E amendments and the Card Act in 2010 and future periods could vary due to a variety of factors, including changes in customer behavior, economic conditions and other potential offsetting factors.
On July 21, 2010, the Dodd-Frank Act became law. The Dodd-Frank Act, among other things, (i) establishes a new Financial Stability Oversight Council to monitor systemic risk posed by financial firms and imposes additional and enhanced FRB regulations on certain large, interconnected bank holding companies and systemically significant nonbanking firms intended to promote financial stability; (ii) creates a liquidation framework for the resolution of covered financial companies, the costs of which would be paid through assessments on surviving covered financial companies; (iii) makes significant changes to the structure of bank and bank holding company regulation and activities in a variety of areas, including prohibiting proprietary trading and private fund investment activities, subject to certain exceptions; (iv) creates a new framework for the regulation of over-the-counter derivatives and new regulations for the securitization market and strengthens the regulatory oversight of securities and capital markets by the SEC; (v) establishes the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection within the FRB, which will have sweeping powers to administer and enforce a new federal regulatory framework of consumer financial regulation and, to a certain extent, may limit the existing preemption of state lawsobligations with respect to the application of such laws to national banks; (vi) providesmortgage loan foreclosure actions.
We act as servicer and/or master servicer for increased regulation of residential mortgage activities; (vii) revises the FDIC’s assessment baseloans included in securitizations and for deposit insuranceunsecuritized mortgage loans owned by changing from an assessment base defined by deposit liabilities toinvestors. As a risk-based system based on total assets; (viii) authorizes the FRB to issue regulations regarding the amount of any interchange transaction fee that an issuer may charge to ensure that it is reasonable and proportionalservicer or master servicer for those loans we have certain contractual obligations to the cost incurred;securitization trusts, investors or other third parties, including, in our capacity as a servicer, foreclosing on defaulted mortgage loans or, to the extent consistent with the applicable securitization or other investor agreement, considering alternatives to foreclosure such as loan modifications or short sales and, (ix) includes several corporate governance and executive compensation provisions and requirements, including mandating an advisory stockholder vote on executive compensation.
Althoughin our capacity as a master servicer, overseeing the Dodd-Frank Act becameservicing of mortgage loans by the servicer. If we commit a material breach of our obligations as servicer or master servicer, we may be subject to termination if the breach is not cured within a specified period of time following notice, which can generally effective in July, manybe given by the securitization trustee or a specified percentage of its provisions have extended implementation periods and delayed effective dates and will require extensive rulemaking by regulatory authorities as well as require more than 60 studies to be conducted over the next one to two years. Accordingly, in many respects the ultimate impact of the Dodd-Frank Act and its effects on the U.S.

53


financial systemsecurity holders, causing us to lose servicing income. In addition, we may be required to indemnify the securitization trustee against losses from any failure by us, as a servicer or master servicer, to perform our servicing obligations or any act or omission on our part that involves willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence. For certain investors and/or certain transactions, we may be contractually obligated to repurchase a mortgage loan or reimburse the investor for credit losses incurred on the loan as a remedy for servicing errors with respect to the loan. If we have increased repurchase obligations because of claims we did not satisfy our obligations as a servicer or master servicer, or increased loss severity on such repurchases, we may have to materially increase our repurchase reserve.
We may incur costs if we are required to, or if we elect to re-execute or re-file documents or take other action in our capacity as a servicer in connection with pending or completed foreclosures. We may incur litigation costs if the validity of a foreclosure action is challenged by a borrower. If a court were to overturn a foreclosure because of errors or deficiencies in the foreclosure process, we may have liability to a title insurer of the property sold in foreclosure. These costs and the Company willliabilities may not be knownlegally or otherwise reimbursable to us, particularly to the extent they relate to securitized mortgage loans. In addition, if certain documents required for an extended perioda foreclosure action are missing or defective, we could be obligated to cure the defect or repurchase the loan. We may incur liability to securitization investors relating to delays or deficiencies in our processing of time. Nevertheless, the Dodd-Frank Act, including future rules implementing its provisions and the interpretation of those rules, could result in a loss of revenue, require usmortgage assignments or other documents necessary to change certaincomply with state law governing foreclosures. The fair value of our businessmortgage servicing rights may be negatively affected to the extent our servicing costs increase because of higher foreclosure costs. We may be subject to fines and other sanctions, including a foreclosure moratorium or suspension, imposed by Federal or state regulators as a result of actual or perceived deficiencies in our foreclosure practices limitor in the foreclosure practices of other mortgage loan servicers. Any of these actions may harm our ability to pursue certain business opportunities, increase our capital requirements and impose additional assessments and costs on us, and otherwise adverselyreputation or negatively affect our business operationsresidential mortgage origination or servicing business.
For more information, refer to the “Risk Management — Liability for Mortgage Loan Repurchase Losses” and have other negative consequences, including a reduction“— Risks Relating to Servicing Activities” sections of this Report and to the “Critical Accounting Policies — Valuation of Residential Mortgage Servicing Rights” section in our credit ratings.2009 Form 10-K.
Any factor described in this Report or in our 2009 Form 10-K, First Quarter Form 10-Q or FirstSecond Quarter Form 10-Q could by itself, or together with other factors, adversely affect our financial results and condition. There are factors not discussed above or elsewhere in this Report that could adversely affect our financial results and condition.

54


CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As required by SEC rules, the Company’s management evaluated the effectiveness, as of JuneSeptember 30, 2010, of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. The Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer participated in the evaluation. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of JuneSeptember 30, 2010.
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the Company’s Board, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and includes those policies and procedures that:
 pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of assets of the Company;
 provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and
 provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. No change occurred during secondthird quarter in 2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

55


WELLS FARGO & COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
                                
 
 Quarter ended June 30 Six months ended June 30 Quarter ended Sept. 30, Nine months ended Sept. 30,
(in millions, except per share amounts) 2010 2009 2010 2009  2010 2009 2010 2009 
 
Interest income
  
Trading assets $266 206 533 472  $270 216 803 688 
Securities available for sale 2,385 2,887 4,800 5,596  2,492 2,947 7,292 8,543 
Mortgages held for sale 405 545 792 960  449 524 1,241 1,484 
Loans held for sale 30 50 64 117  22 34 86 151 
Loans 10,277 10,532 20,315 21,297  9,779 10,170 30,094 31,467 
Other interest income 109 81 193 172  118 77 311 249 
 
Total interest income 13,472 14,301 26,697 28,614  13,130 13,968 39,827 42,582 
 
Interest expense
  
Deposits 714 957 1,449 1,956  721 905 2,170 2,861 
Short-term borrowings 21 55 39 178  27 32 66 210 
Long-term debt 1,233 1,485 2,509 3,264  1,226 1,301 3,735 4,565 
Other interest expense 55 40 104 76  58 46 162 122 
 
Total interest expense 2,023 2,537 4,101 5,474  2,032 2,284 6,133 7,758 
 
Net interest income
 11,449 11,764 22,596 23,140  11,098 11,684 33,694 34,824 
Provision for credit losses 3,989 5,086 9,319 9,644  3,445 6,111 12,764 15,755 
 
Net interest income after provision for credit losses 7,460 6,678 13,277 13,496  7,653 5,573 20,930 19,069 
 
Noninterest income
  
Service charges on deposit accounts 1,417 1,448 2,749 2,842  1,132 1,478 3,881 4,320 
Trust and investment fees 2,743 2,413 5,412 4,628  2,564 2,502 7,976 7,130 
Card fees 911 923 1,776 1,776  935 946 2,711 2,722 
Other fees 982 963 1,923 1,864  1,004 950 2,927 2,814 
Mortgage banking 2,011 3,046 4,481 5,550  2,499 3,067 6,980 8,617 
Insurance 544 595 1,165 1,176  397 468 1,562 1,644 
Net gains from trading activities 109 749 646 1,536  470 622 1,116 2,158 
Net gains (losses) on debt securities available for sale (1) 30  (78) 58  (197)
Net losses on debt securities available for sale (1)  (114)  (40)  (56)  (237)
Net gains (losses) from equity investments (2) 288 40 331  (117) 131 29 462  (88)
Operating leases 329 168 514 298  222 224 736 522 
Other 581 476 1,191 1,028  536 536 1,727 1,564 
 
Total noninterest income 9,945 10,743 20,246 20,384  9,776 10,782 30,022 31,166 
 
Noninterest expense
  
Salaries 3,564 3,438 6,878 6,824  3,478 3,428 10,356 10,252 
Commission and incentive compensation 2,225 2,060 4,217 3,884  2,280 2,051 6,497 5,935 
Employee benefits 1,063 1,227 2,385 2,511  1,074 1,034 3,459 3,545 
Equipment 588 575 1,266 1,262  557 563 1,823 1,825 
Net occupancy 742 783 1,538 1,579  742 778 2,280 2,357 
Core deposit and other intangibles 553 646 1,102 1,293  548 642 1,650 1,935 
FDIC and other deposit assessments 295 981 596 1,319  300 228 896 1,547 
Other 3,716 2,987 6,881 5,843  3,274 2,960 10,155 8,803 
 
Total noninterest expense 12,746 12,697 24,863 24,515  12,253 11,684 37,116 36,199 
 
Income before income tax expense
 4,659 4,724 8,660 9,365  5,176 4,671 13,836 14,036 
Income tax expense 1,514 1,475 2,915 3,027  1,751 1,355 4,666 4,382 
 
Net income before noncontrolling interests
 3,145 3,249 5,745 6,338  3,425 3,316 9,170 9,654 
Less: Net income from noncontrolling interests 83 77 136 121  86 81 222 202 
 
Wells Fargo net income
 $3,062 3,172 5,609 6,217  $3,339 3,235 8,948 9,452 
 
Wells Fargo net income applicable to common stock
 $2,878 2,575 5,250 4,959  $3,150 2,637 8,400 7,596 
 
Per share information
  
Earnings per common share $0.55 0.58 1.01 1.14  $0.60 0.56 1.61 1.70 
Diluted earnings per common share 0.55 0.57 1.00 1.13  0.60 0.56 1.60 1.69 
Dividends declared per common share 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.39  0.05 0.05 0.15 0.44 
Average common shares outstanding 5,219.7 4,483.1 5,205.1 4,365.9  5,240.1 4,678.3 5,216.9 4,471.2 
Diluted average common shares outstanding 5,260.8 4,501.6 5,243.0 4,375.1  5,273.2 4,706.4 5,252.9 4,485.3 
 
(1) Includes other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) losses of $106$144 million and $308$273 million recognized in earnings consisting of $49($50 million and $972$314 million of total other-than-temporary impairmentOTTI losses, net of $(57)$(94) million and $664$41 million recognized as an increase (decrease) to OTTI losses in other comprehensive income,income) for the quarters ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and other-than-temporary impairmentOTTI losses of $198$342 million and $577$850 million recognized in earnings consisting of $203($253 million and $1,575$1,889 million of total other-than-temporary impairmentOTTI losses, net of $5$(89) million and $998$1,039 million recognized as an increase (decrease) to OTTI losses in other comprehensive income,income) for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
(2) Includes other-than-temporary impairmentOTTI losses of $62$35 million and $155$123 million for the quarters ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $167$202 million and $402$525 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

56


WELLS FARGO & COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (UNAUDITED)
                
 
 June 30,  Dec. 31 Sept. 30, Dec. 31,
(in millions, except shares) 2010 2009  2010 2009 
 
Assets
  
Cash and due from banks $17,571 27,080  $16,001 27,080 
Federal funds sold, securities purchased under resale agreements and other short-term investments 73,898 40,885  56,549 40,885 
Trading assets 47,132 43,039  49,271 43,039 
Securities available for sale 157,927 172,710  176,875 172,710 
Mortgages held for sale (includes $34,877 and $36,962 carried at fair value) 38,581 39,094 
Loans held for sale (includes $238 and $149 carried at fair value) 3,999 5,733 
Loans (includes $367 carried at fair value at June 30, 2010) 766,265 782,770 
Mortgages held for sale (includes $42,791 and $36,962 carried at fair value) 46,001 39,094 
Loans held for sale (includes $436 and $149 carried at fair value) 1,188 5,733 

Loans (includes $353 carried at fair value at September 30, 2010)

 753,664 782,770 
Allowance for loan losses  (24,584)  (24,516)  (23,939)  (24,516)
 
Net loans 741,681 758,254  729,725 758,254 
 
Mortgage servicing rights:  
Measured at fair value (residential MSRs) 13,251 16,004  12,486 16,004 
Amortized 1,037 1,119  1,013 1,119 
Premises and equipment, net 10,508 10,736  9,636 10,736 
Goodwill 24,820 24,812  24,831 24,812 
Other assets 95,457 104,180  97,208 104,180 
 
Total assets (1) $1,225,862 1,243,646  $1,220,784 1,243,646 
 
Liabilities
  
Noninterest-bearing deposits $175,015 181,356  $184,451 181,356 
Interest-bearing deposits 640,608 642,662  630,061 642,662 
 
Total deposits 815,623 824,018  814,512 824,018 
Short-term borrowings 45,187 38,966  50,715 38,966 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities 58,582 62,442  67,249 62,442 
Long-term debt (includes $361 carried at fair value at June 30, 2010) 185,072 203,861 
Long-term debt (includes $351 carried at fair value at September 30, 2010) 163,143 203,861 
 
Total liabilities (2) 1,104,464 1,129,287  1,095,619 1,129,287 
 
Equity
  
Wells Fargo stockholders’ equity:  
Preferred stock 8,980 8,485  8,840 8,485 
Common stock — $1-2/3 par value, authorized 9,000,000,000 shares; issued 5,245,971,422 shares and 5,245,971,422 shares 8,743 8,743 
Common stock — $1-2/3 par value, authorized 9,000,000,000 shares; issued 5,253,819,623 shares and 5,245,971,422 shares 8,756 8,743 
Additional paid-in capital 52,687 52,878  52,899 52,878 
Retained earnings 46,126 41,563  48,953 41,563 
Cumulative other comprehensive income 4,844 3,009  5,502 3,009 
Treasury stock — 14,575,741 shares and 67,346,829 shares  (631)  (2,450)
Treasury stock — 9,442,860 shares and 67,346,829 shares  (466)  (2,450)
Unearned ESOP shares  (977)  (442)  (826)  (442)
 
Total Wells Fargo stockholders’ equity 119,772 111,786  123,658 111,786 
Noncontrolling interests 1,626 2,573  1,507 2,573 
 
Total equity 121,398 114,359  125,165 114,359 
 
Total liabilities and equity $1,225,862 1,243,646  $1,220,784 1,243,646 
 
 
(1) Our consolidated assets at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, include the following assets of certain variable interest entities (VIEs) that can only be used to settle the liabilities of those VIEs: Cash and due from banks, $379$150 million; Trading assets, $93$95 million; Securities available for sale, $2.6$2.7 billion; Net loans, $20.5$18.7 billion; Other assets, $2.4$1.5 billion, and Total assets, $26.0$23.2 billion.
(2) Our consolidated liabilities at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, include the following VIE liabilities for which the VIE creditors do not have recourse to Wells Fargo: Short-term borrowings, $346$6 million; Accrued expenses and other liabilities, $771$205 million; Long-term debt, $10.3$8.9 billion; and Total liabilities, $11.4$9.1 billion.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

57


WELLS FARGO & COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)
                                
 
     
        
        
 Preferred stock Common stock  Preferred stock Common stock 
(in millions, except shares) Shares Amount Shares Amount  Shares Amount Shares Amount 
 
Balance, December 31, 2008 10,111,821 $31,332 4,228,630,889 $7,273  10,111,821 $31,332 4,228,630,889 $7,273 
 
Cumulative effect from change in accounting for other-than-temporary impairment on debt securities  
Effect of change in accounting for noncontrolling interests  
 
Balance, January 1, 2009 10,111,821 31,332 4,228,630,889 7,273  10,111,821 31,332 4,228,630,889 7,273 
 
Comprehensive income:  
Net income  
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:  
Translation adjustments  
Net unrealized gains on securities available for sale, net of reclassification of $5 million of net losses included in net income 
Net unrealized losses on derivatives and hedging activities, net of reclassification of $175 million of net gains on cash flow hedges included in net income 
Net unrealized gains on securities available for sale, net of reclassification of $45 million of net gains included in net income 
Net unrealized losses on derivatives and hedging activities, net of reclassification of $257 million of net gains on cash flow hedges included in net income 
Unamortized gains under defined benefit plans, net of amortization  
 
Total comprehensive income  
Noncontrolling interests  
Common stock issued 439,968,781 654  451,324,822 654 
Common stock repurchased  (2,731,755)   (3,353,597) 
Preferred stock released to ESOP  
Preferred stock converted to common shares  (32,703)  (33) 2,280,480   (41,280)  (41) 2,593,044 
Common stock dividends  
Preferred stock dividends and accretion 198  298 
Tax benefit upon exercise of stock options  
Stock option compensation expense  
Net change in deferred compensation and related plans  
 
Net change  (32,703) 165 439,517,506 654   (41,280) 257 450,564,269 654 
 
Balance, June 30, 2009 10,079,118 $31,497 4,668,148,395 $7,927 
Balance, September 30, 2009 10,070,541 $31,589 4,679,195,158 $7,927 
 
Balance, January 1, 2010
 9,980,940 $8,485 5,178,624,593 $8,743  9,980,940 $8,485 5,178,624,593 $8,743 
 
Cumulative effect from change in accounting for VIEs
  
Cumulative effect from change in accounting for embedded credit derivatives
 
Comprehensive income:
  
Net income
  
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
  
Translation adjustments
  
Net unrealized gains on securities available for sale, net of
reclassification of $134 million of net gains included in net income
 
Net unrealized gains on derivatives and hedging activities, net of
reclassification of $204 million of net gains on cash flow hedges included in net income
 
Net unrealized gains on securities available for sale, net of reclassification of $86 million of net gains included in net income
 
Net unrealized gains on derivatives and hedging activities, net of reclassification of $363 million of net gains on cash flow hedges included in net income
 
Unamortized gains under defined benefit plans, net of amortization
  
 
Total comprehensive income
  
Noncontrolling interests
  
Common stock issued
 37,142,817  44,660,913 4 
Common stock repurchased
  (2,206,165)   (2,321,917) 
Preferred stock issued to ESOP
 1,000,000 1,000  1,000,000 1,000 
Preferred stock released to ESOP
  
Preferred stock converted to common shares
  (504,847)  (505) 17,834,436   (644,958)  (645) 23,413,174 9 
Common stock warrants repurchased
  
Common stock dividends
  
Preferred stock dividends
  
Tax benefit upon exercise of stock options
  
Stock option compensation expense
  
Net change in deferred compensation and related plans
  
 
Net change
 495,153 495 52,771,088   355,042 355 65,752,170 13 
 
Balance, June 30, 2010
 10,476,093 $8,980 5,231,395,681 $8,743 
Balance, September 30, 2010
 10,335,982 $8,840 5,244,376,763 $8,756 
 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

58


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
                                 
  
Wells Fargo stockholders’ equity       
          Cumulative          Total       
  Additional      other      Unearned  Wells Fargo       
  paid-in  Retained  comprehensive  Treasury  ESOP  stockholders’  Noncontrolling  Total 
  capital  earnings  income  stock  shares  equity  interests  equity 
 
   36,026   36,543   (6,869)  (4,666)  (555)  99,084   3,232  $102,316 
 
       53   (53)                  
   (3,716)                  (3,716)  3,716    
 
   32,310   36,596   (6,922)  (4,666)  (555)  95,368   6,948   102,316 
 
                                 
       6,217               6,217   121   6,338 
                                 
           35           35   (4)  31 
           6,039           6,039   34   6,073 
           (300)          (300)      (300)
           558           558       558 
 
                       12,549   151   12,700 
   (5)                  (5)  (340)  (345)
   7,845   (733)      1,542       9,308       9,308 
               (63)      (63)      (63)
   (2)              35   33       33 
   (40)          73               
       (1,657)              (1,657)      (1,657)
       (1,258)              (1,060)      (1,060)
   3                   3       3 
   138                   138       138 
   21           (12)      9       9 
 
   7,960   2,569   6,332   1,540   35   19,255   (189)  19,066 
 
   40,270   39,165   (590)  (3,126)  (520)  114,623   6,759  $121,382 
 
   52,878   41,563   3,009   (2,450)  (442)  111,786   2,573  $114,359 
 
       183               183       183 
                                 
       5,609               5,609   136   5,745 
                                 
           (13)          (13)  (1)  (14)
           1,672           1,672   11   1,683 
 
 
          144           144       144 
           32           32       32 
 
                       7,444   146   7,590 
   17                   17   (1,093)  (1,076)
   21   (338)      1,182       865       865 
               (68)      (68)      (68)
   80               (1,080)          
   (40)              545   505       505 
   (62)          567               
   (540)                  (540)      (540)
   2   (522)              (520)      (520)
       (369)              (369)      (369)
   76                   76       76 
   67                   67       67 
   188           138       326       326 
 
   (191)  4,563   1,835   1,819   (535)  7,986   (947)  7,039 
 
   52,687   46,126   4,844   (631)  (977)  119,772   1,626  $121,398 
 
 
                                 
 
Wells Fargo stockholders' equity       
          Cumulative          Total       
  Additional      other      Unearned  Wells Fargo       
  paid-in  Retained  comprehensive  Treasury  ESOP  stockholders'  Noncontrolling  Total 
  capital  earnings  income  stock  shares  equity  interests  equity 
  
   36,026   36,543   (6,869)  (4,666)  (555)  99,084   3,232  $102,316 
  

 

      53   (53)                  
   (3,716)                  (3,716)  3,716    
  
   32,310   36,596   (6,922)  (4,666)  (555)  95,368   6,948   102,316 
  
                                 
       9,452               9,452   202   9,654 
                                 
           63           63   (5)  58 

 

          10,566           10,566   64   10,630 

 

          (189)          (189)      (189)
           570           570       570 
  
                       20,462   261   20,723 
  
   21                   21   (435)  (414)
   7,845   (816)      1,907       9,590       9,590 
               (80)      (80)      (80)
   (3)              44   41       41 
   (42)          83               
       (1,891)              (1,891)      (1,891)
       (1,856)              (1,558)      (1,558)
   9                   9       9 
   180                   180       180 
   23           (15)      8       8 
  
   8,033   4,889   11,010   1,895   44   26,782   (174)  26,608 
  
   40,343   41,485   4,088   (2,771)  (511)  122,150   6,774  $128,924 
  

 

  52,878   41,563   3,009   (2,450)  (442)  111,786   2,573  $114,359 
  
       183               183       183 
       (28)              (28)      (28)
                                 
       8,948               8,948   222   9,170 
                                 
           16           16   12   28 

 

          2,202           2,202   16   2,218 

 
 

          227           227       227 
           48           48       48 
  
                       11,441   250   11,691 
   (3)                  (3)  (1,316)  (1,319)
   72   (375)      1,349       1,050       1,050 
               (71)      (71)      (71)
   80               (1,080)          
   (51)              696   645       645 
   69           567               
   (544)                  (544)      (544)
   2   (785)              (783)      (783)
       (553)              (553)      (553)
   79                   79       79 
   93                   93       93 
   224           139       363       363 
  
   21   7,390   2,493   1,984   (384)  11,872   (1,066)  10,806 
  
   52,899   48,953   5,502   (466)  (826)  123,658   1,507  $125,165 
  
  

59


WELLS FARGO & COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
                
 
 Six months ended June 30 Nine months ended Sept. 30,
(in millions) 2010 2009  2010 2009 
 
Cash flows from operating activities:
  
Net income before noncontrolling interests $5,745 6,338  $9,170 9,654 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:  
Provision for credit losses 9,319 9,644  12,764 15,755 
Changes in fair value of MSRs (residential), MHFS and LHFS carried at fair value 1,384 201  1,195 1,366 
Changes in fair value related to adoption of consolidation accounting guidance 424  
Depreciation and amortization 1,335 1,540  1,502 2,437 
Other net losses (gains) 1,927  (4,028) 4,376  (2,261)
Preferred shares released to ESOP 505 33  645 41 
Stock option compensation expense 67 138  93 180 
Excess tax benefits related to stock option payments  (75)  (3)  (79)  (9)
Originations of MHFS  (153,453)  (226,452)  (252,075)  (321,098)
Proceeds from sales of and principal collected on mortgages originated for sale 161,908 207,006  251,814 306,882 
Originations of LHFS  (4,206)  (5,403)  (4,554)  (8,641)
Proceeds from sales of and principal collected on LHFS 10,555 10,723  15,220 15,937 
Purchases of LHFS  (4,673)  (3,947)  (5,998)  (6,461)
Net change in:  
Trading assets  (3,938) 14,592  873 13,834 
Deferred income taxes 2,416 3,289  4,015 4,835 
Accrued interest receivable 727 284  771 948 
Accrued interest payable  (56)  (631)  (238)  (1,157)
Other assets, net  (4,595)  (326)  (12,034)  (6,159)
Other accrued expenses and liabilities, net  (8,462) 4,851   (4,660)  (833)
 
Net cash provided by operating activities 16,854 17,849  22,800 25,250 
 
Cash flows from investing activities:
  
Net change in:  
Federal funds sold, securities purchased under resale agreements and other short-term investments  (33,013) 33,457   (15,664) 31,942 
Securities available for sale:  
Sales proceeds 3,981 18,871  5,125 46,337 
Prepayments and maturities 22,741 18,484  33,349 28,746 
Purchases  (11,095)  (80,923)  (37,161)  (89,395)
Loans:  
Decrease in banking subsidiaries’ loan originations, net of collections 20,904 28,470  27,359 44,337 
Proceeds from sales (including participations) of loans originated for investment by banking subsidiaries 3,556 3,179  5,011 4,569 
Purchases (including participations) of loans by banking subsidiaries  (1,201)  (1,563)  (1,673)  (2,007)
Principal collected on nonbank entities’ loans ��8,006 6,471  11,706 10,224 
Loans originated by nonbank entities  (5,309)  (4,319)  (7,960)  (7,117)
Net cash paid for acquisitions  (11)  (132)  (23)  (132)
Proceeds from sales of foreclosed assets 2,346 1,813  3,669 2,708 
Changes in MSRs from purchases and sales  (15)  (9)  (29)  (9)
Other, net 830 683  1,827 4,951 
 
Net cash provided by investing activities 11,720 24,482  25,536 75,154 
 
Cash flows from financing activities:
  
Net change in:  
Deposits  (8,395) 32,192   (9,506) 15,212 
Short-term borrowings 1,094  (52,591) 6,622  (77,274)
Long-term debt:  
Proceeds from issuance 2,165 3,876  2,638 4,803 
Repayment  (31,925)  (35,162)  (57,790)  (55,332)
Preferred stock:  
Cash dividends paid  (369)  (1,053)  (620)  (1,616)
Common stock:  
Proceeds from issuance 865 9,308  1,050 9,590 
Repurchased  (68)  (63)  (71)  (80)
Cash dividends paid  (520)  (1,657)  (783)  (1,891)
Common stock warrants repurchased  (540)    (544)  
Excess tax benefits related to stock option payments 75 3  79 9 
Net change in noncontrolling interests  (465)  (315)  (490)  (355)
 
Net cash used by financing activities  (38,083)  (45,462)  (59,415)  (106,934)
 
Net change in cash and due from banks
  (9,509)  (3,131)  (11,079)  (6,530)
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period 27,080 23,763  27,080 23,763 
 
Cash and due from banks at end of period
 $17,571 20,632  $16,001 17,233 
 
Supplemental cash flow disclosures:  
Cash paid for interest $4,157 6,105  $6,371 8,915 
Cash paid for income taxes 625 1,062  917 2,834 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements. See Note 1 for noncash activities.

60


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
See the Glossary of Acronyms at the end of this Report for terms used throughout the Financial Statements and related Notes of this Form 10-Q.
1.1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Wells Fargo & Company is a nation-wide diversified, community-based financial services company. We provide banking, insurance, investments, mortgage banking, investment banking, retail banking, brokerage, and consumer finance through banking stores, the internet and other distribution channels to consumers, businesses and institutions in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and in other countries. When we refer to “Wells Fargo,” “the Company,” “we,” “our” or “us” in this Form 10-Q, we mean Wells Fargo & Company and Subsidiaries (consolidated). Wells Fargo & Company (the Parent) is a financial holding company and a bank holding company. We also hold a majority interest in a real estate investment trust, which has publicly traded preferred stock outstanding.
Our accounting and reporting policies conform with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and practices in the financial services industry. To prepare the financial statements in conformity with GAAP, management must make estimates based on assumptions about future economic and market conditions (for example, unemployment, market liquidity, real estate prices, etc.) that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and income and expenses during the reporting period and the related disclosures. Although our estimates contemplate current conditions and how we expect them to change in the future, it is reasonably possible that in 2010 actual conditions could be worse than anticipated in those estimates, which could materially affect our results of operations and financial condition. Management has made significant estimates in several areas, including the evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) on investment securities (Note 4), allowance for credit losses and purchased credit-impaired (PCI) loans (Note 5), valuing residential mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) (Notes 7 and 8) and financial instruments (Note 12), liability for mortgage loan repurchase losses (Note 7), pension accounting (Note 14) and income taxes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Among other effects, such changes could result in future impairments of investment securities, increases to the allowance for loan losses, as well as increased future pension expense.
The information furnished in these unaudited interim statements reflects all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the periods presented. These adjustments are of a normal recurring nature, unless otherwise disclosed in this Form 10-Q. The results of operations in the interim statements do not necessarily indicate the results that may be expected for the full year. The interim financial information should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (2009 Form 10-K). Certain amounts in the financial statements for prior years have been revised to conform with current financial statement presentation.

61


Accounting Developments
In first quarter 2010, we adopted the following accounting updates to the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC or Codification):
 Accounting Standards Update (ASU or Update) 2010-6,Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements;
 ASU 2009-16,Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets(Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (FAS) 166,Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets — an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140)140);
 ASU 2009-17,Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities(FAS 167,, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)); and
 ASU 2010-10,Amendments for Certain Investment Funds.
In third quarter 2010, we adopted the following accounting updates to the Codification:
ASU 2010-18,Effect of a Loan Modification When the Loan is Part of a Pool That is Accounted for as a Single Asset; and
ASU 2010-11, Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives.
Information about these accounting updates is further described in more detail below.
ASU 2010-6 amends the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. Companies are now required to disclose significant transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy, whereas the previous rules only required the disclosure of transfers in and out of Level 3. Additionally, in the rollforward of Level 3 activity, companies must present information on purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements on a gross basis rather than on a net basis. The Update also clarifies that fair value measurement disclosures should be presented for each class of assets and liabilities. A class is typically a subset of a line item in the statement of financial position. Companies should also provide information about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring instruments classified as either Level 2 or Level 3. We adopted this guidance in first quarter 2010 with prospective application, except for the new requirement related to the Level 3 rollforward. Gross presentation in the Level 3 rollforward is effective for us in first quarter 2011 with prospective application. Our adoption of the Update did not affect our consolidated financial statement results since it amends only the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements.
ASU 2009-16 (FAS 166) modifies certain guidance contained in ASC 860,Transfers and Servicing.This pronouncement eliminates the concept of qualifying special purpose entities (QSPEs) and provides additional criteria transferors must use to evaluate transfers of financial assets. The Update also requires that any assets or liabilities retained from a transfer accounted for as a sale must be initially recognized at fair value. We adopted this guidance in first quarter 2010 with prospective application for transfers that occurred on and after January 1, 2010.
ASU 2009-17 (FAS 167) amends several key consolidation provisions related to variable interest entities (VIEs), which are included in ASC 810,Consolidation. The scope of the new guidance includes entities that were previously designated as QSPEs. The Update also changes the approach companies must use to identify VIEs for which they are deemed to be the primary beneficiary and are required to consolidate. Under the new guidance, a VIE’s primary beneficiary is the entity that has the power to direct the VIE’s significant activities, and has an obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could be potentially significant to the VIE. The Update also requires companies to continually reassess whether they are the primary beneficiary of a VIE, whereas the previous rules only required reconsideration upon the occurrence of certain triggering events. We adopted this guidance in first quarter 2010, which resulted

62


in the consolidation of $18.6 billion of incremental assets onto our consolidated balance sheet and a $183 million increase to beginning retained earnings as a cumulative effect adjustment.

62


We also elected the fair value option for those newly consolidated VIEs for which our interests, prior to January 1, 2010, were predominantly carried at fair value with changes in fair value recorded to earnings. Accordingly, the fair value option was elected to effectively continue fair value accounting through earnings for those interests. Conversely, we did not elect the fair value option for those newly consolidated VIEs that did not share these characteristics. At January 1, 2010, the fair value of loans and long-term debt for which we elected the fair value option was $1.0 billion and $1.0 billion, respectively. The incremental impact of electing the fair value option (compared to not electing) on the cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings was an increase of $15 million. See Notes 7 and 12 in this Report for additional information.
ASU 2010-10 amends consolidation accounting guidance to defer indefinitely the application of ASU 2009-17 to certain investment funds. The amendment was effective for us in first quarter 2010. As a result, we did not consolidate any investment funds upon adoption of ASU 2009-17.
ASU 2010-18 provides guidance for modified PCI loans that are accounted for within a pool. Under the new guidance, modified PCI loans should not be removed from a pool even if those loans would otherwise be deemed troubled debt restructurings. The Update also clarifies that entities should consider the impact of modifications on a pool of PCI loans when evaluating that pool for impairment. These accounting changes were effective for us in third quarter 2010. Our adoption of the Update did not affect our consolidated financial statement results, as the new guidance is consistent with our current accounting practice.
ASU 2010-11 provides guidance clarifying when entities should evaluate embedded credit derivative features in financial instruments issued from structures such as collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) and synthetic CDOs. The Update clarifies that bifurcation and separate accounting is not required for embedded credit derivative features that are only related to the transfer of credit risk that occurs when one financial instrument is subordinate to another. Embedded derivatives related to other types of credit risk must be analyzed to determine the appropriate accounting treatment. The guidance also allows companies to elect fair value option upon adoption for any investment in a beneficial interest in securitized financial assets. By making this election, companies would not be required to evaluate whether embedded credit derivative features exist for those interests. This guidance was effective for us in third quarter 2010. In conjunction with our adoption of this standard, we recorded a $28 million decrease to beginning retained earnings as a cumulative effect adjustment.

63


Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Noncash activities are presented below, including information on transfers affecting mortgages held for sale (MHFS), loans held for sale (LHFS), and MSRs.
                
 
 Six months ended June 30, Nine months ended Sept. 30,
(in millions) 2010 2009  2010 2009 
 
 
Transfers from trading assets to securities available for sale $ 845  $ 845 
Transfers from loans to securities available for sale 3,468  
Transfers from (to) loans to (from) securities available for sale 3,468  (258)
Transfers from MHFS to trading assets  663  6,950 2,993 
Transfers from MHFS to MSRs 2,025 3,550  3,086 5,088 
Transfers from MHFS to foreclosed assets 102 87  189 125 
Transfers from (to) loans to (from) MHFS 99 45 
Transfers from loans to MHFS 126 60 
Transfers from (to) loans to (from) LHFS  (77) 16  100  (6)
Transfers from loans to foreclosed assets 5,481 3,307  6,736 5,067 
Adoption of consolidation accounting guidance:  
Trading assets 155   155  
Securities available for sale  (7,590)    (7,590)  
Loans 25,657   25,657  
Other assets 193   193  
Short-term borrowings 5,127   5,127  
Long-term debt 13,134   13,134  
Accrued expenses and other liabilities  (32)    (32)  
Decrease in noncontrolling interests due to deconsolidation of subsidiaries 240   440  
Transfer from noncontrolling interests to long-term debt 345   345  
 
Subsequent Events
We have evaluated the effects of subsequent events that have occurred subsequent to period end JuneSeptember 30, 2010. There have been no material events that would require recognition in our secondthird quarter 2010 consolidated financial statements or disclosure in the Notes to the financial statements.
On October 27, 2010, we announced that we are submitting supplemental affidavits for approximately 55,000 foreclosures pending before courts in 23 judicial foreclosure states following our identification of instances where a final step in our process relating to the execution of foreclosure affidavits (including a final review of the affidavit, as well as some aspects of the notarization process) did not strictly adhere to the required procedures. The issues we have identified do not relate to the quality of the customer and loan data, and we do not believe that any of these instances led to foreclosures which should not have otherwise occurred.

6364


2.2. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
We regularly explore opportunities to acquire financial services companies and businesses. Generally, we do not make a public announcement about an acquisition opportunity until a definitive agreement has been signed. For information on additional consideration related to acquisitions, which is considered to be a guarantee, see Note 10 in this Report.
In the first halfnine months of 2010, we completed twothree acquisitions with combined total assets of $431$440 million consisting of a factoring business and antwo insurance brokerage business.businesses. At JuneSeptember 30, 2010, we had one small insurance brokerageno pending business acquisition pending and expect to complete this transaction during third quarter 2010.combinations.
On December 31, 2008, Wells Fargo acquired Wachovia Corporation (Wachovia). The purchase accounting for the Wachovia acquisition was finalized as of December 31, 2009. Costs associated with involuntary employee termination, contract terminations and closing duplicate facilities were recorded throughout 2009 and allocated to the purchase price. The following table summarizes the first halfnine months of 2010 usage of the exit reserves associated with the Wachovia acquisition.
                                
 
 Employee Contract Facilities    Employee Contract Facilities   
(in millions) termination termination related Total  termination termination related Total 
 
 
Balance, December 31, 2009 $355 58 344 757  $355 58 344 757 
Cash payments / utilization
  (121)  (16)  (92)  (229)  (162)  (47)  (183)  (392)
 
Balance, June 30, 2010
 $234 42 252 528 
Balance, September 30, 2010
 $193 11 161 365 
 
 
3.3. FEDERAL FUNDS SOLD, SECURITIES PURCHASED UNDER RESALE AGREEMENTS AND OTHER SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS
The following table provides the detail of federal funds sold, securities purchased under resale agreements and other short-term investments.
                
 
 June 30, Dec. 31, Sept. 30, Dec. 31,
(in millions) 2010 2009  2010 2009 
   
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements $16,302 8,042  $20,761 8,042 
Interest-earning deposits 55,550 31,668  33,826 31,668 
Other short-term investments 2,046 1,175  1,962 1,175 
 
Total $73,898 40,885  $56,549 40,885 
 
 
We pledge certain financial instruments that we own to collateralize repurchase agreements and other securities financings. The types of collateral we pledge include securities issued by federal agencies, government-sponsored entities (GSEs), and domestic and foreign companies. We pledged $18.3$21.9 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, and $14.8 billion at December 31, 2009, under agreements that permit the secured parties to sell or repledge the collateral. Pledged collateral where the secured party cannot sell or repledge was $782$944 million at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, and $434 million at December 31, 2009.
We receive collateral from other entities under resale agreements and securities borrowings. We received $136.3$12.4 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, and $31.4 billion at December 31, 2009, for which we have the right to sell or repledge the collateral. These amounts include securities we have sold or repledged to others with a fair value of $134.7$9.9 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, and $29.7 billion at December 31, 2009.

6465


4.4. SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE
The following table provides the cost and fair value for the major categories of securities available for sale carried at fair value. The net unrealized gains (losses) are reported on an after-tax basis as a component of cumulative other comprehensive income (OCI). There were no securities classified as held to maturity as of the periods presented.
                                
 
 Gross Gross    Gross Gross   
 unrealized unrealized Fair  unrealized unrealized Fair 
(in millions) Cost gains losses value  Cost gains losses value 
 
June 30, 2010
 

September 30, 2010

 
Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies
 $1,621 64  1,685  $1,652 91  1,743 
Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions
 16,205 764  (545) 16,424  17,756 922  (511) 18,167 
Mortgage-backed securities:
  
Federal agencies
 66,915 4,489  (9) 71,395  79,898 3,723  (26) 83,595 
Residential
 19,425 2,501  (780) 21,146  18,538 2,710  (462) 20,786 
Commercial
 12,513 1,293  (1,276) 12,530  12,791 1,253  (1,050) 12,994 
 
Total mortgage-backed securities
 98,853 8,283  (2,065) 105,071  111,227 7,686  (1,538) 117,375 
 
Corporate debt securities
 8,848 1,159  (64) 9,943  9,027 1,419  (36) 10,410 
Collateralized debt obligations
 4,020 340  (329) 4,031  4,483 327  (284) 4,526 
Other(1)
 15,219 754  (363) 15,610  18,968 784  (374) 19,378 
 
Total debt securities
 144,766 11,364  (3,366) 152,764  163,113 11,229  (2,743) 171,599 
 
Marketable equity securities:
  
Perpetual preferred securities
 3,999 237  (150) 4,086  3,769 267  (100) 3,936 
Other marketable equity securities
 572 509  (4) 1,077  612 731  (3) 1,340 
 
Total marketable equity securities
 4,571 746  (154) 5,163  4,381 998  (103) 5,276 
 
Total
 $149,337 12,110  (3,520) 157,927  $167,494 12,227  (2,846) 176,875 
 
December 31, 2009
  
Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies
 $2,256 38  (14) 2,280  $2,256 38  (14) 2,280 
Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions 13,212 683  (365) 13,530  13,212 683  (365) 13,530 
Mortgage-backed securities:  
Federal agencies 79,542 3,285  (9) 82,818  79,542 3,285  (9) 82,818 
Residential 28,153 2,480  (2,043) 28,590  28,153 2,480  (2,043) 28,590 
Commercial 12,221 602  (1,862) 10,961  12,221 602  (1,862) 10,961 
 
Total mortgage-backed securities 119,916 6,367  (3,914) 122,369  119,916 6,367  (3,914) 122,369 
 
Corporate debt securities 8,245 1,167  (77) 9,335  8,245 1,167  (77) 9,335 
Collateralized debt obligations 3,660 432  (367) 3,725  3,660 432  (367) 3,725 
Other (1) 15,025 1,099  (245) 15,879  15,025 1,099  (245) 15,879 
 
Total debt securities 162,314 9,786  (4,982) 167,118  162,314 9,786  (4,982) 167,118 
 
Marketable equity securities:  
Perpetual preferred securities 3,677 263  (65) 3,875  3,677 263  (65) 3,875 
Other marketable equity securities 1,072 654  (9) 1,717  1,072 654  (9) 1,717 
 
Total marketable equity securities 4,749 917  (74) 5,592  4,749 917  (74) 5,592 
 
Total $167,063 10,703  (5,056) 172,710  $167,063 10,703  (5,056) 172,710 
 
 
(1) Included in the “Other” category are asset-backed securities collateralized by auto leases or loans and cash reserves with a cost basis and fair value of $6.7$8.1 billion and $6.9$8.3 billion, respectively, at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, and $8.2 billion and $8.5 billion, respectively, at December 31, 2009. Also included in the “Other” category are asset-backed securities collateralized by home equity loans with a cost basis and fair value of $1.0 billion$864 million and $1.2$1.0 billion, respectively, at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, and $2.3 billion and $2.5 billion, respectively, at December 31, 2009. The remaining balances primarily include asset-backed securities collateralized by credit cards and student loans.
As part of our liquidity management strategy, we pledge securities to secure borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) and the Federal Reserve Bank. We also pledge securities to secure trust and public deposits and for other purposes as required or permitted by law. Securities pledged where the secured party does not have the right to sell or repledge totaled $91.7$97.9 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, and $98.9

66


$98.9 billion at December 31, 2009. We did not pledge any securities where the secured party has the right to sell or repledge the collateral as of the same periods, respectively.

65


Gross Unrealized Losses and Fair Value
The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and fair value of securities in the securities available-for-sale portfolio by length of time that individual securities in each category had been in a continuous loss position. Debt securities on which we have taken credit-related OTTI write-downs are categorized as being “less than 12 months” or “12 months or more” in a continuous loss position based on the point in time that the fair value declined to below the cost basis and not the period of time since the credit-related OTTI write-down.
                                                
 
 Less than 12 months 12 months or more Total  Less than 12 months 12 months or more Total 
 Gross Gross Gross    Gross Gross Gross   
 unrealized Fair unrealized Fair unrealized Fair  unrealized Fair unrealized Fair unrealized Fair 
(in millions) losses value losses value losses value  losses value losses value losses value 
 
June 30, 2010
 

September 30, 2010

 
Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions
 $(93) 2,653  (452) 2,715  (545) 5,368  $(112) 2,990  (399) 2,929  (511) 5,919 
Mortgage-backed securities:
  
Federal agencies
  (9) 1,010    (9) 1,010   (26) 10,856    (26) 10,856 
Residential
  (19) 788  (761) 5,316  (780) 6,104   (39) 724  (423) 4,741  (462) 5,465 
Commercial
  (10) 366  (1,266) 5,589  (1,276) 5,955   (6) 249  (1,044) 5,737  (1,050) 5,986 
 
Total mortgage-backed securities
  (38) 2,164  (2,027) 10,905  (2,065) 13,069   (71) 11,829  (1,467) 10,478  (1,538) 22,307 
 
Corporate debt securities
  (18) 731  (46) 290  (64) 1,021   (8) 185  (28) 168  (36) 353 
Collateralized debt obligations
  (18) 687  (311) 519  (329) 1,206   (26) 923  (258) 411  (284) 1,334 
Other
  (70) 1,432  (293) 812  (363) 2,244   (63) 1,913  (311) 596  (374) 2,509 
 
Total debt securities
  (237) 7,667  (3,129) 15,241  (3,366) 22,908   (280) 17,840  (2,463) 14,582  (2,743) 32,422 
 
Marketable equity securities:
  
Perpetual preferred securities
  (139) 1,349  (11) 74  (150) 1,423   (47) 979  (53) 383  (100) 1,362 
Other marketable equity securities
  (4) 65    (4) 65   (3) 21    (3) 21 
 
Total marketable equity securities
  (143) 1,414  (11) 74  (154) 1,488   (50) 1,000  (53) 383  (103) 1,383 
 
Total
 $(380) 9,081  (3,140) 15,315  (3,520) 24,396  $(330) 18,840  (2,516) 14,965  (2,846) 33,805 
 
December 31, 2009  
Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies $(14) 530    (14) 530  $(14) 530    (14) 530 
Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions  (55) 1,120  (310) 2,826  (365) 3,946   (55) 1,120  (310) 2,826  (365) 3,946 
Mortgage-backed securities:  
Federal agencies  (9) 767    (9) 767   (9) 767    (9) 767 
Residential  (243) 2,991  (1,800) 9,697  (2,043) 12,688   (243) 2,991  (1,800) 9,697  (2,043) 12,688 
Commercial  (37) 816  (1,825) 6,370  (1,862) 7,186   (37) 816  (1,825) 6,370  (1,862) 7,186 
 
Total mortgage-backed securities  (289) 4,574  (3,625) 16,067  (3,914) 20,641   (289) 4,574  (3,625) 16,067  (3,914) 20,641 
 
Corporate debt securities  (7) 281  (70) 442  (77) 723   (7) 281  (70) 442  (77) 723 
Collateralized debt obligations  (55) 398  (312) 512  (367) 910   (55) 398  (312) 512  (367) 910 
Other  (73) 746  (172) 286  (245) 1,032   (73) 746  (172) 286  (245) 1,032 
 
Total debt securities  (493) 7,649  (4,489) 20,133  (4,982) 27,782   (493) 7,649  (4,489) 20,133  (4,982) 27,782 
 
Marketable equity securities:  
Perpetual preferred securities  (1) 93  (64) 527  (65) 620   (1) 93  (64) 527  (65) 620 
Other marketable equity securities  (9) 175    (9) 175   (9) 175    (9) 175 
 
Total marketable equity securities  (10) 268  (64) 527  (74) 795   (10) 268  (64) 527  (74) 795 
 
Total $(503) 7,917  (4,553) 20,660  (5,056) 28,577  $(503) 7,917  (4,553) 20,660  (5,056) 28,577 
 
 
We do not have the intent to sell any securities included in the table above. For debt securities included in the previous table, above, we have concluded it is more likely than not that we will not be required to sell prior to recovery of the amortized cost basis. We have assessed each security for credit impairment. For debt

67


securities, we evaluate, where necessary, whether credit impairment exists by comparing the present value of the expected cash flows to the securities amortized cost basis. For equity securities, we consider

66


numerous factors in determining whether impairment exists, including our intent and ability to hold the securities for a period of time sufficient to recover the cost basis of the securities.
For complete descriptions of the factors we consider when analyzing debt securities for impairment, see Note 5 of thein our 2009 Form 10-K. There have been no material changes to our methodologies for assessing impairment in secondthird quarter 2010.
Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies
The unrealized losses associated with U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities do not have any credit losses due to the guarantees provided by the United States government.
Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions
The unrealized losses associated with securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions are primarily driven by changes in interest rates and not due to the credit quality of the securities. Substantially all of these investments are investment grade. The securities were generally underwritten in accordance with our own investment standards prior to the decision to purchase, without relying on a bond insurer’s guarantee in making the investment decision. These investments will continue to be monitored as part of our ongoing impairment analysis, but are expected to perform, even if the rating agencies reduce the credit rating of the bond insurers. As a result, we expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of these securities.
Federal Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities (MBS)
The unrealized losses associated with federal agency MBS are primarily driven by changes in interest rates and not due to credit losses. These securities are issued by U.S. government or GSEs and do not have any credit losses given the explicit or implicit government guarantee.
Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities
The unrealized losses associated with private residential MBS are primarily driven by higherchanges in projected collateral losses, wider credit spreads and changes in interest rates. We assess for credit impairment using a cash flow model. The key assumptions include default rates, severities and prepayment rates. We estimate losses to a security by forecasting the underlying mortgage loans in each transaction. The forecasted loan performance is used to project cash flows to the various tranches in the structure. Cash flow forecasts are also considered, and as applicable, independent industry analyst reports and forecasts, sector credit ratings, and other independent market data. Based upon our assessment of the expected credit losses of the security given the performance of the underlying collateral compared with our credit enhancement, we expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of these securities.

6768


Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities
The unrealized losses associated with commercial MBS are primarily driven by higherchanges in projected collateral losses, credit spreads and wider credit spreads.interest rates. These investments are predominantly investment grade. We assess for credit impairment using a cash flow model. The key assumptions include default rates and severities. We estimate losses to a security by forecasting the underlying loans in each transaction. The forecasted loan performance is used to project cash flows to the various tranches in the structure. Cash flow forecasts are also considered, and as applicable, and independent industry analyst reports and forecasts, sector credit ratings, and other independent market data. Based upon our assessment of the expected credit losses of the security given the performance of the underlying collateral compared with our credit enhancement, we expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of these securities.
Corporate Debt Securities
The unrealized losses associated with corporate debt securities are primarily related to securities backed by commercial loans and individual issuer companies. For securities with commercial loans as the underlying collateral, we have evaluated the expected credit losses in the security and concluded that we have sufficient credit enhancement when compared with our estimate of credit losses for the individual security. For individual issuers, we evaluate the financial performance of the issuer on a quarterly basis to determine that the issuer can make all contractual principal and interest payments. Based upon this assessment, we expect to recover the entire cost basis of these securities.
Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs)
The unrealized losses associated with CDOs relate to securities primarily backed by commercial, residential or other consumer collateral. The losses are primarily driven by higherchanges in projected collateral losses, credit spreads and wider credit spreads.interest rates. We assess for credit impairment using a cash flow model. The key assumptions include default rates, severities and prepayment rates. Based upon our assessment of the expected credit losses of the security given the performance of the underlying collateral compared with our credit enhancement, we expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of these securities.
Other Debt Securities
The unrealized losses associated with other debt securities primarily relate to other asset-backed securities, which are primarily backed by auto, home equity and student loans. The losses are primarily driven by higherchanges in projected collateral losses, wider credit spreads and changes in interest rates. We assess for credit impairment using a cash flow model. The key assumptions include default rates, severities and prepayment rates. Based upon our assessment of the expected credit losses of the security given the performance of the underlying collateral compared with our credit enhancement, we expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of these securities.
Marketable Equity Securities
Our marketable equity securities include investments in perpetual preferred securities, which provide very attractive tax-equivalent yields. We evaluated these hybrid financial instruments with investment-grade ratings for impairment using an evaluation methodology similar to that used for debt securities. Perpetual preferred securities wereare not considered other-than-temporarily impaired at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, if there wasis no evidence of credit deterioration or investment rating downgrades of any issuers to below investment grade, and we expected to continue to receive full contractual payments. We will continue to evaluate the prospects for these securities for recovery in their market value in accordance with our policy for estimating OTTI. We have recorded impairment write-downs on perpetual preferred securities where there was evidence of credit deterioration.

6869


The fair values of our investment securities could decline in the future if the underlying performance of the collateral for the residential and commercial MBS or other securities deteriorate and our credit enhancement levels do not provide sufficient protection to our contractual principal and interest. As a result, there is a risk that significant OTTI may occur in the future given the current economic environment.
The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and fair value of debt and perpetual preferred securities available for sale by those rated investment grade and those rated less than investment grade, according to their lowest credit rating by Standard & Poor’s Rating Services (S&P) or Moody’s Investors Service (Moody’s). Credit ratings express opinions about the credit quality of a security. Securities rated investment grade, that is those rated BBB- or higher by S&P or Baa3 or higher by Moody’s, are generally considered by the rating agencies and market participants to be low credit risk. Conversely, securities rated below investment grade, labeled as “speculative grade” by the rating agencies, are considered to be distinctively higher credit risk than investment grade securities. We have also included securities not rated by S&P or Moody’s in the table below based on the internal credit grade of the securities (used for credit risk management purposes) equivalent to the credit rating assigned by major credit agencies. The unrealized losses and fair value of unrated securities categorized as investment grade based on internal credit grades were $55$234 million and $1.1 billion, respectively, at JuneSeptember 30, 2010. There were no unrated securities in a loss position categorized as investment grade based on internal credit grades as of December 31, 2009. If an internal credit grade was not assigned, we categorized the security as non-investment grade.
                                
 
 Investment grade Non-investment grade  Investment grade Non-investment grade 
 Gross Gross    Gross Gross   
 unrealized Fair unrealized Fair  unrealized Fair unrealized Fair 
(in millions) losses value losses value  losses value losses value 
 
June 30, 2010
 

September 30, 2010

 
Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions
 $(453) 4,991  (92) 377  $(415) 5,429  (96) 490 
Mortgage-backed securities:
  
Federal agencies
  (9) 1,010     (26) 10,856   
Residential
  (19) 773  (761) 5,331   (13) 401  (449) 5,064 
Commercial
  (736) 5,227  (540) 728   (585) 5,229  (465) 757 
 
Total mortgage-backed securities
  (764) 7,010  (1,301) 6,059   (624) 16,486  (914) 5,821 
 
Corporate debt securities
  (31) 129  (33) 892   (22) 143  (14) 210 
Collateralized debt obligations
  (89) 731  (240) 475   (71) 801  (213) 533 
Other
  (210) 1,842  (153) 402   (262) 2,259  (112) 250 
 
Total debt securities
  (1,547) 14,703  (1,819) 8,205   (1,394) 25,118  (1,349) 7,304 
Perpetual preferred securities
  (131) 1,314  (19) 109   (94) 1,268  (6) 94 
 
Total
 $(1,678) 16,017  (1,838) 8,314  $(1,488) 26,386  (1,355) 7,398 
 
December 31, 2009  
Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies $(14) 530    $(14) 530   
Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions  (275) 3,621  (90) 325   (275) 3,621  (90) 325 
Mortgage-backed securities:  
Federal agencies  (9) 767     (9) 767   
Residential  (480) 5,661  (1,563) 7,027   (480) 5,661  (1,563) 7,027 
Commercial  (1,247) 6,543  (615) 643   (1,247) 6,543  (615) 643 
 
Total mortgage-backed securities  (1,736) 12,971  (2,178) 7,670   (1,736) 12,971  (2,178) 7,670 
 
Corporate debt securities  (31) 260  (46) 463   (31) 260  (46) 463 
Collateralized debt obligations  (104) 471  (263) 439   (104) 471  (263) 439 
Other  (85) 644  (160) 388   (85) 644  (160) 388 
 
Total debt securities  (2,245) 18,497  (2,737) 9,285   (2,245) 18,497  (2,737) 9,285 
Perpetual preferred securities  (65) 620     (65) 620   
 
Total $(2,310) 19,117  (2,737) 9,285  $(2,310) 19,117  (2,737) 9,285 
 
 

6970


Contractual Maturities
The following table shows the remaining contractual principal maturities and contractual yields of debt securities available for sale. The remaining contractual principal maturities for MBS were determined assuming no prepayments. Remaining expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to prepay obligations before the underlying mortgages mature. The weighted-average yield is computed using the contractual coupon of each security weighted based on the fair value of each security.
                                         
  
          Remaining contractual principal maturity 
      Weighted-          After one year  After five years    
  Total  average  Within one year  through five years  through ten years  After ten years 
(in millions) amount  yield  Amount  Yield  Amount  Yield  Amount  Yield  Amount  Yield 
 
June 30, 2010
                                        
Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies
 $1,685   3.17% $12   3.49% $748   3.14% $919   3.19% $6   4.05%
Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions
  16,424   6.37   402   2.81   1,371   4.59   1,509   6.19   13,142   6.68 
Mortgage-backed securities:
                                        
Federal agencies
  71,395   5.47   2   5.89   43   6.28   548   5.23   70,802   5.47 
Residential
  21,146   5.27         113   0.54   302   5.53   20,731   5.29 
Commercial
  12,530   5.35         84   5.62   603   3.59   11,843   5.43 
                                 
Total mortgage-backed securities
  105,071   5.41   2   5.89   240   3.35   1,453   4.61   103,376   5.43 
                                 
Corporate debt securities
  9,943   5.53   612   4.94   3,846   5.89   4,507   5.36   978   5.33 
Collateralized debt obligations
  4,031   1.29   2   5.20   456   1.71   1,868   1.36   1,705   1.09 
Other
  15,610   3.57   3,719   4.96   6,217   4.09   1,372   1.74   4,302   2.21 
                                 
Total debt securities at fair value(1)
 $152,764   5.20% $4,749   4.77% $12,878   4.53% $11,628   4.13% $123,509   5.39%
 
December 31, 2009                                        
Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies $2,280   2.80% $413   0.79% $669   2.14% $1,192   3.87% $6   4.03%
Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions  13,530   6.75   77   7.48   703   6.88   1,055   6.56   11,695   6.76 
Mortgage-backed securities:                                        
Federal agencies  82,818   5.50   12   4.68   50   5.91   271   5.56   82,485   5.50 
Residential  28,590   5.40   51   4.80   115   0.45   283   5.69   28,141   5.41 
Commercial  10,961   5.29   85   0.68   71   5.55   169   5.66   10,636   5.32 
                                 
Total mortgage-backed securities  122,369   5.46   148   2.44   236   3.14   723   5.63   121,262   5.46 
                                 
Corporate debt securities  9,335   5.53   684   4.00   3,937   5.68   3,959   5.68   755   5.32 
Collateralized debt obligations  3,725   1.70   2   5.53   492   4.48   1,837   1.56   1,394   0.90 
Other  15,879   4.22   2,128   5.62   7,762   5.96   697   2.46   5,292   1.33 
                                 
Total debt securities at fair value (1) $167,118   5.33% $3,452   4.63% $13,799   5.64% $9,463   4.51% $140,404   5.37%
 
 
(1)The weighted-average yield is computed using the contractual coupon of each security weighted based on the fair value of each security.
                                         
 
          Remaining contractual principal maturity 
      Weighted-          After one year  After five years    
  Total  average  Within one year  through five years  through ten years  After ten years 
(in millions) amount  yield  Amount  Yield  Amount  Yield  Amount  Yield  Amount  Yield 
  

September 30, 2010

                                        
Securities of U.S. Treasury and
federal agencies
 $1,743   3.16% $11   4.54% $732   3.02% $897   3.15% $103   4.12%
Securities of U.S. states and
political subdivisions
  18,167   6.44   392   2.97   1,742   4.76   1,540   6.59   14,493   6.72 
Mortgage-backed securities:
                                        
Federal agencies
  83,595   5.15   5   6.54   36   5.95   514   5.26   83,040   5.14 
Residential
  20,786   5.21   33   0.38   76   0.48   203   5.05   20,474   5.23 
Commercial
  12,994   5.38         102   5.60   528   3.55   12,364   5.46 
                                  
Total mortgage-backed
securities
  117,375   5.18   38   1.26   214   3.84   1,245   4.50   115,878   5.19 
                                  
Corporate debt securities
  10,410   5.78   656   4.76   3,890   5.96   4,813   5.87   1,051   5.31 
Collateralized debt obligations
  4,526   1.04   2   5.39   462   1.21   2,212   0.96   1,850   1.09 
Other
  19,378   2.87   3,346   4.02   10,711   3.02   2,167   1.86   3,154   1.85 
                                  
Total debt securities at
fair value
 $171,599   4.96% $4,445   4.01% $17,751   3.80% $12,874   4.12% $136,529   5.22%
         
                                         
December 31, 2009                                        
Securities of U.S. Treasury and
federal agencies
 $2,280   2.80% $413   0.79% $669   2.14% $1,192   3.87% $6   4.03%
Securities of U.S. states and
political subdivisions
  13,530   6.75   77   7.48   703   6.88   1,055   6.56   11,695   6.76 
Mortgage-backed securities:                                        
Federal agencies  82,818   5.50   12   4.68   50   5.91   271   5.56   82,485   5.50 
Residential  28,590   5.40   51   4.80   115   0.45   283   5.69   28,141   5.41 
Commercial  10,961   5.29   85   0.68   71   5.55   169   5.66   10,636   5.32 
                                  
Total mortgage-backed
securities
  122,369   5.46   148   2.44   236   3.14   723   5.63   121,262   5.46 
                                  
Corporate debt securities  9,335   5.53   684   4.00   3,937   5.68   3,959   5.68   755   5.32 
Collateralized debt obligations  3,725   1.70   2   5.53   492   4.48   1,837   1.56   1,394   0.90 
Other  15,879   4.22   2,128   5.62   7,762   5.96   697   2.46   5,292   1.33 
                                  
Total debt securities at
fair value
 $167,118   5.33% $3,452   4.63% $13,799   5.64% $9,463   4.51% $140,404   5.37%
         
  

7071


Realized Gains and Losses
The following table shows the gross realized gains and losses on sales from the securities available-for-sale portfolio, which includes marketable equity securities, but does not include nonmarketable equity securities (see Note 6 — Other Assets). Gross realized losses include OTTI write-downs for debt securities available for sale and marketable equity securities.
                                
 
 Quarter ended June 30, Six months ended June 30, Quarter ended Sept. 30, Nine months ended Sept. 30,
(in millions) 2010 2009 2010 2009  2010 2009 2010 2009 
 

 
Gross realized gains $260 416  444 710  $71 378 515 1,088 
Gross realized losses  (109)  (348)  (230)  (718)  (3)  (23)  (21)  (94)
Write-downs  (145)  (277)  (357)  (924)
 
Net realized gains (losses) $151 68 214  (8) $(77) 78 137 70 
 
 
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment
The following table shows the detail of OTTI write-downs included in earnings for debt securities and marketable and nonmarketable equity securities.
                                
 
 Quarter ended June 30, Six months ended June 30, Quarter ended Sept. 30, Nine months ended Sept. 30, 
(in millions) 2010 2009 2010 2009  2010 2009 2010 2009 
 
OTTI write-downs included in earnings
  
Debt securities:  
U.S. states and political subdivisions $3 5 8 5  $8 1 16 6 
Residential mortgage-backed securities 37 214 76 392 
Commercial mortgage-backed securities 42 1 55 11 
Mortgage-backed securities: 
Federal agencies 14  14  
Residential 56 134 132 526 
Commercial 50 67 105 78 
Corporate debt securities 4 22 5 53  5 5 10 58 
Collateralized debt obligations 5 46 11 96  1 25 12 121 
Other debt securities 15 20 43 20  10 41 53 61 
 
Total debt securities 106 308 198 577  144 273 342 850 
 
Equity securities:  
Marketable equity securities:  
Perpetual preferred securities  18 14 45  1 2 15 47 
Other marketable equity securities  9  25   2  27 
 
Total marketable equity securities  27 14 70  1 4 15 74 
 
Total securities available for sale 145 277 357 924 
 
Nonmarketable equity securities 62 128 153 332  34 119 187 451 
Total equity securities 62 155 167 402 
 
Total OTTI write-downs included in earnings $168 463 365 979  $179 396 544 1,375 
 
 

7172


Other-Than-Temporarily Impaired Debt Securities
We recognize OTTI for debt securities classified as available for sale in accordance with FASB ASC 320,Investments — Debt and Equity Securities, which requires that we assess whether we intend to sell or it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell a security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current-period credit losses. For debt securities that are considered other-than-temporarily impaired and that we do not intend to sell and will not be required to sell prior to recovery of our amortized cost basis, we separate the amount of the impairment into the amount that is credit related (credit loss component) and the amount due to all other factors. The credit loss component is recognized in earnings and is the difference between the security’s amortized cost basis and the present value of its expected future cash flows discounted at the security’s effective yield. The remaining difference between the security’s fair value and the present value of future expected cash flows is due to factors that are not credit related and, therefore, is not required to be recognized as losses in the income statement, but is recognized in OCI. We believe that we will fully collect the carrying value of securities on which we have recorded a non-credit-related impairment in OCI.
The following table shows the detail of OTTI write-downs on debt securities available for sale included in earnings and the related changes in OCI for the same securities.
                                
 
 Quarter ended June 30, Six months ended June 30, Quarter ended Sept. 30, Nine months ended Sept. 30,
(in millions) 2010 2009 2010 2009  2010 2009 2010 2009 
 
OTTI on debt securities
  
Recorded as part of gross realized losses:  
Credit-related OTTI $106 307 195 570  $129 251 324 821 
Securities we intend to sell  1 3 7  15 22 18 29 
 
Total recorded as part of gross realized losses 106 308 198 577  144 273 342 850 
 
Recorded directly to OCI for non-credit-related impairment:  
U.S. states and political subdivisions  (1) 4  (5) 4  1   (4) 4 
Residential mortgage-backed securities  (124) 608  (98) 922   (160) 75  (258) 997 
Commercial mortgage-backed securities 84 14 82 21  69  (1) 151 20 
Corporate debt securities   (2)   (2)  (1)   (1)  (2)
Collateralized debt obligations  (3) 17 56 30    (18) 56 12 
Other debt securities  (13) 23  (30) 23   (3)  (15)  (33) 8 
 
Total recorded directly to OCI for non-credit-related impairment (1)  (57) 664 5 998 
Total recorded directly to OCI for non-
credit-related impairment (1)
  (94) 41  (89) 1,039 
 
Total OTTI on debt securities $49 972 203 1,575  $50 314 253 1,889 
 
 
(1) Represents amounts recorded to OCI on debt securities in periods OTTI write-downs have occurred. Changes in fair value in subsequent periods on such securities are not reflected in this total unless the securities also had a credit impairment charge to income recorded for the subsequent period.

7273


The following table presents a roll-forward of the credit loss component recognized in earnings for debt securities we still own (referred to as “credit-impaired” debt securities). The credit loss component of the amortized cost represents the difference between the present value of expected future cash flows and the amortized cost basis of the security prior to considering credit losses. OTTI recognized in earnings for credit-impaired debt securities is presented as additions in two components based upon whether the current period is the first time the debt security was credit-impaired (initial credit impairment) or is not the first time the debt security was credit impaired (subsequent credit impairments). The credit loss component is reduced if we sell, intend to sell or believe we will be required to sell previously credit-impaired debt securities. Additionally, the credit loss component is reduced if we receive or expect to receive cash flows in excess of what we previously expected to receive over the remaining life of the credit-impaired debt security, the security matures or is fully written down.
Changes in the credit loss component of credit-impaired debt securities that we do not intend to sell were:
                 
  
  Quarter ended June 30, Six months ended June 30,
(in millions) 2010  2009  2010  2009 
 
Credit loss component, beginning of period
 $1,002   727   1,187   471 
Additions (1):                
Initial credit impairments  39   216   59   413 
Subsequent credit impairments  67   91   136   157 
Reductions:                
For securities sold  (51)  (16)  (76)  (23)
For securities derecognized resulting from adoption of consolidation accounting guidance        (242)   
Due to change in intent to sell or requirement to sell  (2)  (1)  (2)  (1)
For increases in expected cash flows  (6)  (5)  (13)  (5)
 
Credit loss component, end of period
 $1,049   1,012   1,049   1,012 
 
 
(1)Excludes OTTI on debt securities we intend to sell of $1 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, and $3 million and $7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
                 
 
  Quarter ended Sept. 30, Nine months ended Sept. 30,
(in millions) 2010  2009  2010  2009 
  
Credit loss component, beginning of period
 $1,049   1,012   1,187   471 
Additions:                
Initial credit impairments  42   124   101   537 
Subsequent credit impairments  87   127   223   284 
  
Total additions  129   251   324   821 
  
Reductions:                
For securities sold  (105)  (8)  (181)  (31)
For securities derecognized resulting from adoption of
consolidation accounting guidance
        (242)   
Due to change in intent to sell or requirement to sell        (2)  (1)
For increases in expected cash flows  (11)     (24)  (5)
  
Total reductions  (116)  (8)  (449)  (37)
  
Credit loss component, end of period
 $1,062   1,255   1,062   1,255 
  
  

7374


For asset-backed securities (e.g., residential MBS), we estimated expected future cash flows of the security by estimating the expected future cash flows of the underlying collateral and applying those collateral cash flows, together with any credit enhancements such as subordinated interests owned by third parties, to the security. The expected future cash flows of the underlying collateral are determined using the remaining contractual cash flows adjusted for future expected credit losses (which consider current delinquencies and nonperforming assets, future expected default rates and collateral value by vintage and geographic region) and prepayments. The expected cash flows of the security are then discounted at the interest rate used to recognize interest income on the security to arrive at a present value amount. Total credit impairment losses on residential MBS were $37 million and $76 million, respectively, for the second quarter and first half of 2010, all of which were recorded on non-investment grade securities, and $214 million and $388 million, respectively, for the same periods of 2009, of which $206 million and $373 million, respectively, were recorded on non-investment grade securities. This does not include OTTI recorded on those securities that we do not intend to sell.sell are shown in the table below. The table belowalso presents a summary of the significant inputs considered in determining the measurement of the credit loss component recognized in earnings for residential MBS.
                 
  
  Non-agency residential MBS – non-investment grade 
  Quarter ended June 30, Six months ended June 30,
  2010  2009  2010  2009 
 
Expected remaining life of loan losses (1):                
Range (2)  1 - 40%  0 - 58   1 - 40   0 - 58 
Credit impairment distribution (3):                
0 - 10% range  54   40   53   55 
10 - 20% range  8   42   14   35 
20 - 30% range  34   17   29   9 
Greater than 30%  4   1   4   1 
Weighted average (4)  8   10   9   10 

Current subordination levels (5):
                
Range (2)  0 - 25   0 - 19   0 - 25   0 - 20 
Weighted average (4)  7   8   7   7 

Prepayment speed (annual CPR (6)):
                
Range (2)  3 - 17   5 - 18   3 - 17   5 - 25 
Weighted average (4)  9   10   9   11 
 
                 
 
  Quarter ended Sept. 30, Nine months ended Sept. 30,
($ in millions) 2010  2009  2010  2009 
  
Credit impairment losses on residential MBS
                
Investment grade $   5      21 
Non-investment grade  55   129   131   501 
  
Total credit impairment losses on residential MBS $55   134   131   522(1)
  

Significant inputs (non-agency — non-investment grade MBS)

                
Expected remaining life of loan losses (2):                
Range (3)  3 - 39%  0 - 57   1 - 40   0 - 58 
Credit impairment distribution (4):                
0 - 10% range  64   50   58   54 
10 - 20% range  35   9   23   28 
20 - 30% range  0   23   16   13 
Greater than 30%  1   18   3   5 
Weighted average (5)  9   12   9   12 
Current subordination levels (6):                
Range (3)  0 - 23   0 - 44   0 - 25   0 - 44 
Weighted average (5)  7   9   7   8 
Prepayment speed (annual CPR (7)):                
Range (3)  3 - 27   5 - 18   3 - 27   5 - 25 
Weighted average (5)  21   11   13   11 
  
(1)Prior period amounts have been restated to conform to current presentation.
(2) Represents future expected credit losses on underlying pool of loans expressed as a percentage of total current outstanding loan balance.
(2)(3) Represents the range of inputs/assumptions based upon the individual securities within each category.
(3)(4) Represents distribution of credit impairment losses recognized in earnings categorized based on range of expected remaining life of loan losses. For example 54%64% of credit impairment losses recognized in earnings for the quarter ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010, had expected remaining life of loan loss assumptions of 0 to 10%.
(4)(5) Calculated by weighting the relevant input/assumption for each individual security by current outstanding amortized cost basis of the security.
(5)(6) Represents current level of credit protection (subordination) for the securities, expressed as a percentage of total current underlying loan balance.
(6)(7) Constant prepayment rate.

7475


5.5. LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
The following table presents the major categories of loans outstanding including those subject to accounting guidance for PCI loans. Certain loans acquired in the Wachovia acquisition are accounted for as PCI loans and are included below, net of any remaining purchase accounting adjustments. Outstanding balances of all other loans are presented net of unearned income, net deferred loan fees, and unamortized discountdiscounts and premiumpremiums totaling $12.7a net reduction of $11.7 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, and $14.6 billion at December 31, 2009.
                                                
 
 June 30, 2010 Dec. 31, 2009  Sept. 30, 2010 Dec. 31, 2009 
 All All    All All   
 PCI other PCI other    PCI other PCI other   
(in millions) loans loans Total loans loans Total  loans loans Total loans loans Total 
   
Commercial and commercial real estate:  
Commercial $1,113 144,971 146,084 1,911 156,441 158,352  $987 146,334 147,321 1,911 156,441 158,352 
Real estate mortgage 3,487 96,139 99,626 4,137 93,390 97,527  3,118 95,637 98,755 4,137 93,390 97,527 
Real estate construction 4,194 26,685 30,879 5,207 31,771 36,978  3,549 24,362 27,911 5,207 31,771 36,978 
Lease financing  13,492 13,492  14,210 14,210   12,993 12,993  14,210 14,210 
   
Total commercial and commercial real estate 8,794 281,287 290,081 11,255 295,812 307,067  7,654 279,326 286,980 11,255 295,812 307,067 
   
Consumer:  
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage 35,972 197,840 233,812 38,386 191,150 229,536  34,432 193,649 228,081 38,386 191,150 229,536 
Real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage 290 101,037 101,327 331 103,377 103,708  262 98,798 99,060 331 103,377 103,708 
Credit card  22,086 22,086  24,003 24,003   21,890 21,890  24,003 24,003 
Other revolving credit and installment  88,485 88,485  89,058 89,058   87,962 87,962  89,058 89,058 
   
Total consumer 36,262 409,448 445,710 38,717 407,588 446,305  34,694 402,299 436,993 38,717 407,588 446,305 
   
Foreign 1,457 29,017 30,474 1,733 27,665 29,398  1,498 28,193 29,691 1,733 27,665 29,398 
   
Total loans $46,513 719,752 766,265 51,705 731,065 782,770  $43,846 709,818 753,664 51,705 731,065 782,770 
   
   
We pledge loans to secure borrowings from the FHLB and the Federal Reserve Bank as part of our liquidity management strategy. Loans pledged where the secured party does not have the right to sell or repledge totaled $318.3$296.7 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, and $312.6 billion at December 31, 2009. We did not have any pledged loans where the secured party has the right to sell or repledge for the same respective periods.
The total allowance reflects management’s estimate of credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. We consider the allowance for credit losses of $25.1$24.4 billion adequate to cover credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio, including unfunded credit commitments, at JuneSeptember 30, 2010.

7576


The allowance for credit losses consists of the allowance for loan losses and the reserve for unfunded credit commitments. Changes in the allowance for credit losses were:
                                
 
 Quarter ended June 30 Six months ended June 30 Quarter ended Sept. 30, Nine months ended Sept. 30,
(in millions) 2010 2009 2010 2009  2010 2009 2010 2009 
   
Balance, beginning of period
 $25,656 22,846 25,031 21,711  $25,085 23,530 25,031 21,711 
Provision for credit losses 3,989 5,086 9,319 9,644  3,445 6,111 12,764 15,755 
Adjustment for passage of time on certain impaired loans (1)  (62)   (136)    (67)   (203)  
Loan charge-offs:  
Commercial and commercial real estate:  
Commercial  (810)  (755)  (1,577)  (1,351)  (588)  (986)  (2,165)  (2,337)
Real estate mortgage  (364)  (125)  (645)  (154)  (236)  (190)  (881)  (344)
Real estate construction  (289)  (263)  (694)  (370)  (296)  (279)  (990)  (649)
Lease financing  (31)  (65)  (65)  (85)  (29)  (88)  (94)  (173)
   
Total commercial and commercial real estate  (1,494)  (1,208)  (2,981)  (1,960)  (1,149)  (1,543)  (4,130)  (3,503)
   
Consumer:  
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage  (1,140)  (790)  (2,537)  (1,214)  (1,164)  (1,015)  (3,701)  (2,229)
Real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage  (1,239)  (1,215)  (2,735)  (2,088)  (1,140)  (1,340)  (3,875)  (3,428)
Credit card  (639)  (712)  (1,335)  (1,334)  (556)  (691)  (1,891)  (2,025)
Other revolving credit and installment  (542)  (802)  (1,292)  (1,702)  (572)  (860)  (1,864)  (2,562)
   
Total consumer  (3,560)  (3,519)  (7,899)  (6,338)  (3,432)  (3,906)  (11,331)  (10,244)
   
Foreign  (52)  (56)  (99)  (110)  (49)  (71)  (148)  (181)
   
Total loan charge-offs  (5,106)  (4,783)  (10,979)  (8,408)  (4,630)  (5,520)  (15,609)  (13,928)
   
Loan recoveries:  
Commercial and commercial real estate:  
Commercial 121 51 238 91  79 62 317 153 
Real estate mortgage 4 6 14 16  18 6 32 22 
Real estate construction 51 4 62 6  20 5 82 11 
Lease financing 4 4 9 7  6 6 15 13 
   
Total commercial and commercial real estate 180 65 323 120  123 79 446 199 
   
Consumer:  
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage 131 32 217 65  130 49 347 114 
Real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage 55 44 102 70  55 49 157 119 
Credit card 60 48 113 88  52 43 165 131 
Other revolving credit and installment 181 198 384 402  165 178 549 580 
   
Total consumer 427 322 816 625  402 319 1,218 944 
   
Foreign 10 10 21 19  10 11 31 30 
   
Total loan recoveries 617 397 1,160 764  535 409 1,695 1,173 
   
Net loan charge-offs (2)  (4,489)  (4,386)  (9,819)  (7,644)  (4,095)  (5,111)  (13,914)  (12,755)
   
Allowances related to business combinations/other (3)  (9)  (16) 690  (181) 4  (2) 694  (183)
   
Balance, end of period
 $25,085 23,530 25,085 23,530  $24,372 24,528 24,372 24,528 
   
Components:  
Allowance for loan losses $24,584 23,035 24,584 23,035  $23,939 24,028 23,939 24,028 
Reserve for unfunded credit commitments 501 495 501 495  433 500 433 500 
   
Allowance for credit losses $25,085 23,530 25,085 23,530  $24,372 24,528 24,372 24,528 
   
Net loan charge-offs (annualized) as a percentage of average total loans (2)  2.33% 2.11 2.52 1.82   2.14% 2.50 2.40 2.05 
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans (4) 3.21 2.80 3.21 2.80  3.18 3.00 3.18 3.00 
Allowance for credit losses as a percentage of total loans (4) 3.27 2.86 3.27 2.86  3.23 3.07 3.23 3.07 
   
(1) Certain impaired loans have a valuation allowance determined by discounting expected cash flows at the respective loan’s effective interest rate. Accordingly, the valuation allowance for these impaired loans reduces with the passage of time and that reduction is recognized as interest income.
(2) For PCI loans, charge-offs are only recorded to the extent that losses exceed the purchase accounting estimates.
(3) Includes $693 million related to the adoption of consolidation accounting guidance on January 1, 2010.
(4) The allowance for credit losses includes $225$379 million and $49$233 million at JuneSeptember 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, related to PCI loans acquired from Wachovia. Loans acquired from Wachovia are included in total loans net of related purchase accounting net write-downs.

7677


Nonaccrual loans were $27.8$28.3 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, and $24.4 billion at December 31, 2009. PCI loans have been classified as accruing. Loans past due 90 days or more past due as to interest or principal and still accruing interest were $19.4$18.8 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, and $22.2 billion at December 31, 2009. The June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, balances included $14.4$14.5 billion and $15.3 billion, respectively, in advances pursuant to our servicing agreements to the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) mortgage pools and similar loans whose repayments are insured by the Federal Housing Administration or guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Impaired Loans and Troubled Debt Restructurings (TDRs)
We consider a loan to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will not be able to collect all principal and/or interest amounts as scheduled in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan. Accordingly, impaired loans generally include all nonaccrual commercial, consumer and foreign loans and all troubled debt restructurings (TDRs), whether or not in interest-accruing status. We evaluate large groups of smaller-balance homogeneous loans collectively to measure impairment allowance and perform a loan-specific impairment assessment for larger-balance loans and all TDRs. The table below summarizes recorded investment and related allowance information for the larger-balance impaired loans and TDRs, which, in accordance with FASB ASC 310-10-35 (formerly FAS No. 114) impaired loan accounting guidance requires loan-specific impairment assessment for larger-balance impaired loans and all TDRs, both accruing and nonaccruing. The table below summarizes the recorded investment and related allowance information for all impaired loans that are evaluatedsubject to ASC 310-10-35 assessment and measured on a loan-specific basis.disclosures. In accordance with that accounting guidance, we determine the allowance for loans that are individually deemed to be impaired, based on cash flows estimated for their life, discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or on the value of the underlying collateral if we determine that collateral will be the sole source of repayment.repayment (collateral-dependent). Impaired loans will not have a related allowance for credit losses if the collateral value or the present value of expected cash flows (discounted at the pre-modification rate) exceed the recorded investment. The following table does not include PCI loans as those loans are subject to different accounting and reporting requirements.
                                                
 
 Recorded investment    Recorded investment   
 Impaired loans with    Impaired loans with   
 related allowance for Related allowance  related allowance for Related allowance 
 Impaired loans credit losses (1) for credit losses  Impaired loans credit losses for credit losses 
 June 30, Dec. 31, June 30 Dec. 31 June 30 Dec. 31 Sept. 30, Dec. 31, Sept. 30, Dec. 31, Sept. 30, Dec. 31,
(in millions) 2010 2009(2) 2010 2009(2) 2010 2009(2)  2010 2009(1) 2010 2009(1) 2010 2009(1) 
   
Commercial and commercial real estate $11,011 10,562 10,029 9,666 1,367 1,502  $12,476 10,562 10,540 9,666 2,346 1,502 
Consumer (TDRs) 11,496 8,268 11,496 8,268 2,806 1,765 
Consumer 13,191 8,268 13,191 8,268 3,402 1,765 
   
Total $22,507 18,830 21,525 17,934 4,173 3,267  $25,667 18,830 23,731 17,934 5,748 3,267 
   
   
(1)Loans will not have a related allowance if the collateral value or the present value of expected cash flows (discounted at the pre-modification rate) exceed the recorded investment.
(2) Balances have been revised to conform with current period presentation.
The average recorded investment in impaired loans was $23.8 billion and $22.0 billion in the third quarter and first nine months of 2010, respectively. Included in total impaired loans above are $243$279 million at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, and $561 million at December 31, 2009, of collateral-dependent loans for which the impairment measurement is based on the underlying collateral value.
The average recorded investment in impaired loans was $20.7 billion and $19.3 billion in the second quarter and first half of 2010, respectively.
Totalfollowing table presents interest income recognized on impaired loans was $184 million and $350 million in the second quarter and first half of 2010, with $54 million and $101 million under the cash basis method, respectively, and $58 million and $102 million in the second quarter and first half of 2009, with $30 million and $51 million under the cash basis method, respectively.after impairment.
                 
 
  Quarter ended Sept. 30, Nine months ended Sept. 30,
(in millions) 2010  2009  2010  2009 
  
Cash basis of accounting $95   34   196   85 
Other (1)  113   22   362   73 
  
Total $208   56   558   158 
  
  
(1)Includes interest recognized on accruing TDRs and interest recognized related to the passage of time on certain impaired loans. See Footnote 1 to the table of changes in the allowance for credit losses.

7778


Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans
PCI loans had an unpaid principal balance of $74.1$68.8 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, and $83.6 billion at December 31, 2009, and a carrying value, before the deduction of any related allowance for loan losses, of $46.5$43.8 billion and $51.7 billion, respectively.
The excess of cash flows expected to be collected over the initial faircarrying value of PCI loans is referred to as the accretable yield and is accreted into interest income over the estimated lifelives of the PCI loans using the effective yield method. The accretable yield is affected by:
Changes in interest rate indices for variable rate PCI loans — Expected future cash flows are based on the variable rates in effect at the time of the quarterly assessment of expected cash flows;
Changes in prepayment assumptions — Prepayments affect the estimated life of PCI loans which may change the amount of interest income, and possibly principal, expected to be collected; and
Changes in interest rate indices for variable rate PCI loans — Expected future cash flows are based on the variable rates in effect at the time of the quarterly assessment of expected cash flows;
Changes in prepayment assumptions — Prepayments affect the estimated life of PCI loans which may change the amount of interest income, and possibly principal, expected to be collected; and
Changes in the expected principal and interest payments over the estimated life — These changes in expected cash flows are driven by updates to the credit outlook and actions taken with our borrowers. Expected benefits from loan modifications are included in the quarterly assessment of expected future cash flows.
The change in the accretable yield related to PCI loans is presented in the following table.
        
 
(in millions)  
   
Total, December 31, 2008 (refined) $10,447  $10,447 
Accretion  (2,606)  (2,606)
Reclassification from nonaccretable difference for loans with improving cash flows 441  441 
Changes in expected cash flows that do not affect nonaccretable difference (1) 6,277  6,277 
   
Total, December 31, 2009
 14,559  14,559 
Accretion
  (1,329)  (1,857)
Reclassification from nonaccretable difference for loans with improving cash flows
 2,595  3,234 
Changes in expected cash flows that do not affect nonaccretable difference (1)
  (740) 743 
 
Total, June 30, 2010
 $15,085 
Total, September 30, 2010
 $16,679 
   
  
   
Total, March 31, 2010
 $15,803 
Total, June 30, 2010
 $15,085 
Accretion
  (643)  (528)
Reclassification from nonaccretable difference for loans with improving cash flows
 1,927  639 
Changes in expected cash flows that do not affect nonaccretable difference (1)
  (2,002) 1,483 
   
Total, June 30, 2010
 $15,085 
Total, September 30, 2010
 $16,679 
   
   
(1) Represents changes in interest cash flows due to the impact of modifications incorporated into the quarterly assessment of expected future cash flows and/or changes in interest rates on variable rate PCI loans.

79

78


When it is estimated that the expected cash flows have decreased subsequent to acquisition for a PCI loan or pool of loans, an allowance is established and a provision for additional loss is recorded as a charge to income. The following table summarizes the changes in allowance for PCI loan losses.
                                
 
 Commercial,      Commercial,     
 CRE and Other    CRE and Other   
(in millions) foreign Pick-a-Pay consumer Total  foreign Pick-a-Pay consumer Total 
 
Balance, December 31, 2008 $     $    
Provision for losses due to credit deterioration 850  3 853  850  3 853 
Charge-offs  (520)    (520)  (520)    (520)
   
Balance, December 31, 2009
 330  3 333  330  3 333 
Provision for losses due to credit deterioration
 376  26 402  715  35 750 
Charge-offs
  (500)   (10)  (510)  (683)   (21)  (704)
   
Balance, June 30, 2010
 $206  19 225 
Balance, September 30, 2010
 $362  17 379 
   
  
   
Balance at March 31, 2010
 $231  16 247 
Balance, June 30, 2010
 $206  19 225 
Provision for losses due to credit deterioration
 224  13 237  339  9 348 
Charge-offs
  (249)   (10)  (259)  (183)   (11)  (194)
   
Balance at June 30, 2010
 $206  19 225 
Balance, September 30, 2010
 $362  17 379 
   
   

7980


6.6. OTHER ASSETS
The components of other assets were:
                
 
 June 30 Dec. 31 Sept. 30, Dec. 31,
(in millions) 2010 2009  2010 2009 
   
Nonmarketable equity investments:  
Cost method:  
Private equity investments $3,769 3,808  $2,995 3,808 
Federal bank stock 6,024 5,985  5,511 5,985 
   
Total cost method 9,793 9,793  8,506 9,793 
Equity method 6,144 5,138  7,234 5,138 
Principal investments (1) 360 1,423  345 1,423 
   
Total nonmarketable equity investments 16,297 16,354  16,085 16,354 
Corporate/bank-owned life insurance 19,653 19,515  19,770 19,515 
Accounts receivable 18,190 20,565  19,807 20,565 
Interest receivable 5,219 5,946  5,175 5,946 
Core deposit intangibles 9,839 10,774  9,370 10,774 
Customer relationship and other amortized intangibles 2,014 2,154  1,931 2,154 
Net deferred tax assets 306 3,212   3,212 
Foreclosed assets:  
GNMA loans (2) 1,344 960  1,492 960 
Other 3,650 2,199  4,635 2,199 
Operating lease assets 1,870 2,395  1,977 2,395 
Due from customers on acceptances 481 810  308 810 
Other 16,594 19,296  16,658 19,296 
   
Total other assets $95,457 104,180  $97,208 104,180 
   
   
(1) Principal investments are recorded at fair value with realized and unrealized gains (losses) included in net gains (losses) from equity investments in the income statement.
(2) Consistent with regulatory reporting requirements, foreclosed assets include foreclosed real estate securing GNMA loans. Both principal and interest for GNMA loans secured by the foreclosed real estate are collectible because the GNMA loans are insured by the FHA or guaranteed by the VA.
Income related to nonmarketable equity investments was:
                                
 
 Quarter ended June 30 Six months ended June 30 Quarter ended Sept. 30, Nine months ended Sept. 30,
(in millions) 2010 2009 2010 2009  2010 2009 2010 2009 
   
Net gains (losses) from:  
Private equity investments $155  (71) 154  (291) $90  (95) 244  (386)
Principal investments 12  (7) 21  (15) 4 6 25  (9)
All other nonmarketable equity investments  (21)  (94)  (38)  (143)  (86)  (37)  (124)  (180)
   
Net gains (losses) from nonmarketable equity investments $146  (172) 137  (449) $8  (126) 145  (575)
   
   

8081


7.7. SECURITIZATIONS AND VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
Involvement with SPEs
In the normal course of business, we enter into various types of on- and off-balance sheet transactions with special purpose entities (SPEs), which are corporations, trusts or partnerships that are established for a limited purpose. Historically, the majority of SPEs were formed in connection with securitization transactions. In a securitization transaction, assets from our balance sheet are transferred to an SPE, which then issues to investors various forms of interests in those assets and may also enter into derivative transactions. In a securitization transaction, we typically receive cash and/or other interests in an SPE as proceeds for the assets we transfer. Also, in certain transactions, we may retain the right to service the transferred receivables and to repurchase those receivables from the SPE if the outstanding balance of the receivables falls to a level where the cost exceeds the benefits of servicing such receivables. In addition, we may purchase the right to service loans in an SPE that were transferred to the SPE by a third party.
In connection with our securitization activities, we have various forms of ongoing involvement with SPEs, which may include:
 underwriting securities issued by SPEs and subsequently making markets in those securities;
 providing liquidity facilities to support short-term obligations of SPEs issued to third party investors;
 providing credit enhancement on securities issued by SPEs or market value guarantees of assets held by SPEs through the use of letters of credit, financial guarantees, credit default swaps and total return swaps;
 entering into other derivative contracts with SPEs;
 holding senior or subordinated interests in SPEs;
 acting as servicer or investment manager for SPEs; and
 providing administrative or trustee services to SPEs.
SPEs are generally considered variable interest entities (VIEs). A VIE is an entity that has either a total equity investment that is insufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or whose equity investors lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest.ability to control the entity’s activities. Under existing accounting guidance, a VIE is consolidated by its primary beneficiary, the party that has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE and a variable interest that could potentially be significant to the VIE. A variable interest is a contractual, ownership or other interest that changes with changes in the fair value of the VIE’s net assets. To determine whether or not a variable interest we hold could potentially be significant to the VIE, we consider both qualitative and quantitative factors regarding the nature, size and form of our involvement with the VIE. In accordance with existing accounting guidance, we assess whether or not we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE on an on-going basis.
We have segregated our involvement with VIEs between those VIEs which we consolidate, those which we do not consolidate and transfers of financial assets that are accounted for as secured borrowings. Secured borrowings are transactions involving transfers of our financial assets to third parties that are accounted for as financings with the assets pledged as collateral. Accordingly, the transferred assets remain recognized on our balance sheet. Subsequent tables within this Note further segregate these transactions by structure type.

82

81


The classifications of assets and liabilities in our balance sheet associated with our transactions with VIEs follow:
                                
 
 Transfers that    Transfers that   
 VIEs that we VIEs we account    VIEs that we VIEs we account   
 do not that we for as secured    do not that we for as secured   
(in millions) consolidate consolidate borrowings Total  consolidate consolidate borrowings Total 
   
June 30, 2010
 

September 30, 2010

 
Cash
 $ 379 444 823  $ 150 537 687 
Trading assets
 5,351 93 33 5,477  5,444 95 32 5,571 
Securities available for sale(1)
 25,728 2,596 7,191 35,515  27,312 2,735 7,721 37,768 
Loans
 12,274 20,560 1,703 34,537  12,346 18,646 1,541 32,533 
Mortgage servicing rights
 12,009   12,009  11,405   11,405 
Other assets
 3,418 2,368 91 5,877  3,481 1,541 92 5,114 
   
Total assets
 58,780 25,996 9,462 94,238  59,988 23,167 9,923 93,078 
   
Short-term borrowings(2)
  4,743 6,755 11,498    4,717(2) 6,985 11,702 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities(2)
 3,037 752 19 3,808  3,266  614(2) 14 3,894 
Long-term debt(2)
  10,432 1,800 12,232    8,928(2) 1,750 10,678 
   
Total liabilities
 3,037 15,927 8,574 27,538  3,266 14,259 8,749 26,274 
   
Noncontrolling interests
  56  56   �� 40  40 
   
Net assets
 $55,743 10,013 888 66,644  $56,722 8,868 1,174 66,764 
   
December 31, 2009  
Cash
 $ 273 328 601  $ 273 328 601 
Trading assets 6,097 77 35 6,209  6,097 77 35 6,209 
Securities available for sale (1) 35,186 1,794 7,126 44,106  35,186 1,794 7,126 44,106 
Loans 15,698 561 2,007 18,266  15,698 561 2,007 18,266 
Mortgage servicing rights 16,233   16,233  16,233   16,233 
Other assets 5,604 2,595 68 8,267  5,604 2,595 68 8,267 
   
Total assets 78,818 5,300 9,564 93,682  78,818 5,300 9,564 93,682 
   
Short-term borrowings  351 1,996 2,347   351 1,996 2,347 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities 3,352 708 4,864 8,924  3,352 708 4,864 8,924 
Long-term debt  1,448 1,938 3,386   1,448 1,938 3,386 
   
Total liabilities 3,352 2,507 8,798 14,657  3,352 2,507 8,798 14,657 
   
Noncontrolling interests  68  68   68  68 
   
Net assets $75,466 2,725 766 78,957  $75,466 2,725 766 78,957 
   
   
(1) Excludes certain debt securities related to loans serviced for the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC) and GNMA.
(2) Includes the following VIE liabilities at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, with recourse to the general credit of Wells Fargo: Short-term borrowings, $4.4$4.7 billion; Accrued expenses and other liabilities, $92$552 million; and Long-term debt, $163$77 million.
Transactions with Unconsolidated VIEs
Our transactions with VIEs include securitizations of consumer loans, commercial real estate (CRE) loans, student loans, auto loans and municipal bonds; investment and financing activities involving CDOs backed by asset-backed and commercial real estate (CRE)CRE securities, collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) backed by corporate loans or bonds, and other types of structured financing. We have various forms of involvement with VIEs, including holding senior or subordinated interests, entering into liquidity arrangements, credit default swaps and other derivative contracts. These involvements with unconsolidated VIEs are recorded on our balance sheet primarily in trading assets, securities available for sale, loans, MSRs, other assets and other liabilities, as appropriate.
The following tables provide a summary of unconsolidated VIEs with which we have significant continuing involvement.involvement, but are not the primary beneficiary. The balances presented for JuneSeptember 30, 2010, represent our unconsolidated VIEs for which we consider our involvement to be significant. The balances presented for December 31, 2009, include unconsolidated VIEs with which we have continuing

83


involvement that we no longer consider

82


significant. Accordingly, we have excluded these transactions from the balances presented for JuneSeptember 30, 2010. We have refined our definition of significant continuing involvement in accordance with consolidation accounting guidance to exclude unconsolidated VIEs when our continuing involvement relates to third-party sponsored VIEs for which we were not the transferor, and unconsolidated VIEs for which we were the sponsor but do not have any other significant continuing involvement.
Significant continuing involvement includes transactions where we were the sponsor or transferor and have other significant forms of involvement. Sponsorship includes transactions with unconsolidated VIEs where we solely or materially participated in the initial design or structuring of the entity or marketing of the transaction to investors. When we transfer assets to a VIE and account for the transfer as a sale, we are considered the transferor. We consider investments in securities held outside of trading, loans, guarantees, liquidity agreements, written options and servicing of collateral to be other forms of involvement that may be significant. We have excluded certain transactions with unconsolidated VIEs from the JuneSeptember 30, 2010, balances presented in the table below where we have determined that our continuing involvement is not significant due to the temporary nature and size of our variable interests, because we were not the transferor or because we were not involved in the design or operations of the unconsolidated VIEs.
                                                
 
 Other    Other   
 Total Debt and commitments    Total Debt and commitments   
 VIE equity Servicing and Net  VIE equity Servicing and Net 
(in millions) assets (1) interests (2) assets Derivatives guarantees assets  assets interests (1) assets Derivatives guarantees assets 
June 30, 2010   
 Carrying value - asset (liability)   
Residential mortgage loan securitizations (3):
 
September 30, 2010
 
 Carrying value — asset (liability)
  

Residential mortgage loan securitizations:

 
Conforming
 $1,080,550 5,317 10,823   (999) 15,141  $1,092,762 5,065 10,297   (1,020) 14,342 
Other/nonconforming
 90,599 3,753 511 10  (11) 4,263  86,811 3,737 457 3  (4) 4,193 
Commercial mortgage securitizations
 204,793 5,182 629 320  6,131  206,098 5,559 606 392  6,557 
Collateralized debt obligations:
  
Debt securities
 20,088 1,508  941  2,449  21,252 1,472  1,090  2,562 
Loans(4)
 9,882 9,639    9,639 
Loans(2)
 10,010 9,761    9,761 
Asset-based finance structures
 13,146 7,488   (99)  7,389  14,451 8,759   (125)  8,634 
Tax credit structures
 20,026 3,198    (587) 2,611  20,219 3,210    (826) 2,384 
Collateralized loan obligations
 13,996 2,751  48  2,799  14,507 2,897  65  2,962 
Investment funds
 14,027 1,335    1,335  13,278 1,404    1,404 
Other(5)
 18,905 3,356 46 588  (4) 3,986 
Other(3)
 19,095 3,362 45 520  (4) 3,923 
   
Total
 $1,486,012 43,527 12,009 1,808  (1,601) 55,743  $1,498,483 45,226 11,405 1,945  (1,854) 56,722 
   
    

Maximum exposure to loss

 Maximum exposure to loss   
Residential mortgage loan securitizations (3):
 

Residential mortgage loan securitizations:

 
Conforming
 $5,317 10,823  4,233 20,373  $5,065 10,297  4,145 19,507 
Other/nonconforming
 3,753 511 10 27 4,301  3,737 457 3 10 4,207 
Commercial mortgage securitizations
 5,182 629 575  6,386  5,559 606 634  6,799 
Collateralized debt obligation:
  
Debt securities
 1,508  3,060 12 4,580  1,472  3,151 11 4,634 
Loans(4)
 9,639    9,639 
Loans(2)
 9,761    9,761 
Asset-based finance structures
 7,488  99 1,476 9,063  8,759  125 1,966 10,850 
Tax credit structures
 3,198   1 3,199  3,210   1 3,211 
Collateralized loan obligations
 2,751  48 492 3,291  2,897  65 499 3,461 
Investment funds
 1,335   176 1,511  1,404   97 1,501 
Other(5)
 3,356 46 1,384 852 5,638 
Other(3)
 3,362 45 1,251 861 5,519 
   
Total
 $43,527 12,009 5,176 7,269 67,981  $45,226 11,405 5,229 7,590 69,450 
   
   
(continued on following page)

8384


(continued from previous page)
                                                
 
 Other    Other   
 Total Debt and commitments    Total Debt and commitments   
 VIE equity Servicing and Net  VIE equity Servicing and Net 
(in millions) assets (1) interests (2) assets Derivatives guarantees assets  assets interests (1) assets Derivatives guarantees assets 
 
December 31, 2009    
 Carrying value - asset (liability)  Carrying value — asset (liability)
Residential mortgage loan securitizations (3): 
  
Residential mortgage loan securitizations (4): 
Conforming $1,150,515 5,846 13,949   (869) 18,926  $1,150,515 5,846 13,949   (869) 18,926 
Other/nonconforming 251,850 11,683 1,538 16  (15) 13,222  251,850 11,683 1,538 16  (15) 13,222 
Commercial mortgage securitizations 345,561 3,760 696 489  4,945  345,561 3,760 696 489  4,945 
Collateralized debt obligations:  
Debt securities 45,684 3,024  1,746  4,770  45,684 3,024  1,746  4,770 
Loans (4) 10,215 9,964    9,964 
Loans (2) 10,215 9,964    9,964 
Multi-seller commercial paper conduit (5) 5,160      
Asset-based finance structures 17,467 10,187   (72)  (248) 9,867 
Tax credit structures 27,537 4,659    (653) 4,006 
Collateralized loan obligations 23,830 3,602  64  3,666 
Investment funds 84,642 1,831    (129) 1,702 
Other (3) 23,538 3,626 50 1,015  (293) 4,398 
 
Total $1,985,999 58,182 16,233 3,258  (2,207) 75,466 
 

 Maximum exposure to loss
  
Residential mortgage loan securitizations (4): 
Conforming $5,846 13,949  4,567 24,362 
Other/nonconforming 11,683 1,538 30 218 13,469 
Commercial mortgage securitizations 3,760 696 766  5,222 
Collateralized debt obligations: 
Debt securities 3,024  3,586 33 6,643 
Loans (2) 9,964    9,964 
Multi-seller commercial paper conduit 5,160         5,263  5,263 
Asset-based finance structures 17,467 10,187   (72)  (248) 9,867  10,187  72 968 11,227 
Tax credit structures 27,537 4,659    (653) 4,006  4,659   4 4,663 
Collateralized loan obligations 23,830 3,602  64  3,666  3,702  64 473 4,239 
Investment funds 84,642 1,831    (129) 1,702  2,331  500 89 2,920 
Other (5) 23,538 3,626 50 1,015  (293) 4,398 
Other (3) 3,626 50 1,818 1,774 7,268 
   
Total $1,985,999 58,182 16,233 3,258  (2,207) 75,466  $58,782 16,233 12,099 8,126 95,240 
   
     
 Maximum exposure to loss 
Residential mortgage loan securitizations (3): 
Conforming $5,846 13,949  4,567 24,362 
Other/nonconforming 11,683 1,538 30 218 13,469 
Commercial mortgage securitizations 3,760 696 766  5,222 
Collateralized debt obligations: 
Debt securities 3,024  3,586 33 6,643 
Loans (4) 9,964    9,964 
Multi-seller commercial paper conduit   5,263  5,263 
Asset-based finance structures 10,187  72 968 11,227 
Tax credit structures 4,659   4 4,663 
Collateralized loan obligations 3,702  64 473 4,239 
Investment funds 2,331  500 89 2,920 
Other (5) 3,626 50 1,818 1,774 7,268 
 
Total $58,782 16,233 12,099 8,126 95,240 
 
 
(1)Represents the remaining principal balance of assets held by unconsolidated VIEs using the most current information available. For VIEs that obtain exposure to assets synthetically through derivative instruments, the remaining notional amount of the derivative is included in the asset balance. The multi-seller commercial paper conduit was consolidated in first quarter 2010.
(2) Excludes certain debt securities held related to loans serviced for FNMA, FHLMC and GNMA.
(3)Conforming residential mortgage loan securitizations are those that are guaranteed by GSEs. Other commitments and guarantees include amounts related to loans sold that we may be required to repurchase, or otherwise indemnify or reimburse the investor or insurer for losses incurred, due to material breach of contractual representations and warranties. The maximum exposure to loss for material breach of contractual representations and warranties represents a stressed case estimate we utilize for determining stressed case regulatory capital needs. Total VIE assets at December 31, 2009, includes $20.9 billion of nonconforming residential mortgage securitizations that were consolidated in first quarter 2010.
(4)(2) Represents senior loans to trusts that are collateralized by asset-backed securities. The trusts invest primarily in senior tranches from a diversified pool of primarily U.S. asset securitizations, of which all are current, and over 95%92% were rated as investment grade by the primary rating agencies at JuneSeptember 30, 2010. These senior loans were acquired in the Wachovia business combination and are accounted for at amortized cost as initially determined under purchase accounting and are subject to the Company’s allowance and credit charge-off policies.
(5)(3) Includes student loan securitizations, auto loan securitizations and credit-linked note structures. Also contains investments in auction rate securities (ARS) issued by VIEs that we do not sponsor and, accordingly, are unable to obtain the total assets of the entity.
(4)Total VIE assets at December 31, 2009, includes $20.9 billion of nonconforming residential mortgage securitizations that were consolidated in first quarter 2010.
(5)The multi-seller commercial paper conduit was consolidated in first quarter 2010.
In the two preceding tables, above and on the previous page, “Total VIE assets” represents the totalremaining principal balance of assets held by unconsolidated VIEs using the most current information available. For VIEs that obtain exposure to assets synthetically through derivative instruments, the remaining notional amount of unconsolidated VIEs.the derivative is included in the asset balance. “Carrying value” is the amount in our consolidated balance sheet related to our involvement with the unconsolidated VIEs. “Maximum exposure to loss” from our involvement with off-balance sheet entities, which is a required disclosure under GAAP, is determined as the carrying value of our involvement with off-balance sheet (unconsolidated) VIEs plus the remaining undrawn liquidity and lending commitments, the notional amount of net written derivative contracts, and generally the notional amount of, or stressed loss estimate for, other commitments and guarantees. It represents estimated loss that would be incurred under severe, hypothetical circumstances, for which we believe the possibility is extremely remote, such as where the value of our interests and any associated collateral declines to zero, without any consideration of recovery or offset from any economic hedges. Accordingly, this required disclosure is not an indication of expected loss.

8485


Residential mortgage loans
Residential mortgage loan securitizations are financed through the issuance of fixed- or floating-rate-asset-backed-securities, which are collateralized by the loans transferred to a VIE. We typically transfer loans we originated to these VIEs, account for the transfers as sales, retain the right to service the loans and may hold other beneficial interests issued by the VIEs. We also may be exposed to limited liability related to recourse agreements and repurchase agreements we make to our issuers and purchasers, which are included in other commitments and guarantees. In certain instances, we may service residential mortgage loan securitizations structured by third parties whose loans we did not originate or transfer. Our residential mortgage loan securitizations consist of conforming and nonconforming securitizations.
Conforming residential mortgage loan securitizations are those that are guaranteed by GSEs, including GNMA. We do not consolidate our conforming residential mortgage loan securitizations because we do not have power over the VIEs.
The loans sold to the VIEs in nonconforming residential mortgage loan securitizations are those that do not qualify for a GSE guarantee. We do not consolidate the nonconforming residential mortgage loan securitizations included in the table because we do not have a variable interest that could potentially be significant or we do not have power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the performance of the VIE.
Other commitments and guarantees include amounts related to loans sold that we may be required to repurchase, or otherwise indemnify or reimburse the investor or insurer for losses incurred, due to material breach of contractual representations and warranties. The maximum exposure to loss for material breach of contractual representations and warranties represents a stressed case estimate we utilize for determining stressed case regulatory capital needs.
Commercial mortgage loan securitizations
Commercial mortgage loan securitizations are financed through the issuance of fixed- or floating-rate-asset-backed-securities, which are collateralized by the loans transferred to the VIE. In a typical securitization, we may transfer loans we originate to these VIEs, account for the transfers as sales, retain the right to service the loans and may hold other beneficial interests issued by the VIEs. In certain instances, we may service commercial mortgage loan securitizations structured by third parties whose loans we did not originate or transfer. We typically serve as primary or master servicer of these VIEs. The primary or master servicer in a commercial mortgage loan securitization typically cannot make the most significant decisions impacting the performance of the VIE and therefore does not have power over the VIE. We do not consolidate the commercial mortgage loan securitizations included in the disclosure because we either do not have power or do not have a significant variable interest.
We have not transferred loans to or sponsored a commercial mortgage loan securitization since the credit market disruption began in late 2007. However, we have involvement with transactions established prior to 2008 in the form of servicing or holding other beneficial interests issued by the VIEs.
Collateralized debt obligations (CDOs)
A CDO is a securitization where an SPE purchases a pool of assets consisting of asset-backed securities and issues multiple tranches of equity or notes to investors. In some transactions, a portion of the assets are obtained synthetically through the use of derivatives such as credit default swaps or total return swaps.
Prior to 2008, we engaged in the structuring of CDOs on behalf of third party asset managers who would select and manage the assets for the CDO. Typically, the asset manager has some discretion to manage the sale of assets of, or derivatives used by the CDO, which generally gives the asset manager the power over the CDO. We have not structured these types of transactions since the credit market disruption began in late 2007.

86


In addition to our role as arranger we may have other forms of involvement with these transactions, including transactions established prior to 2008. Such involvement may include acting as liquidity provider, derivative counterparty, secondary market maker or investor. For certain transactions, we may also act as the collateral manager or servicer. We receive fees in connection with our role as collateral manager or servicer.

85


We assess whether we are the primary beneficiary of CDOs based on our role in the transaction in combination with the variable interests we hold. Subsequently, we monitor our ongoing involvement in these transactions to determine if the nature of our involvement has changed. We are not the primary beneficiary of these transactions in most cases because we do not act as the collateral manager or servicer, which generally denotes power. In cases where we are the collateral manager or servicer, we are not the primary beneficiary because we do not hold interests that could potentially be significant to the VIE.
Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs)
A CLO is a securitization where an SPE purchases a pool of assets consisting of loans and issues multiple tranches of equity or notes to investors. Generally, CLOs are structured on behalf of a third party asset manager that typically selects and manages the assets for the term of the CLO. Typically, the asset manager has the power over the significant decisions of the VIE through its discretion to manage the assets of the CLO. We assess whether we are the primary beneficiary of CLOs based on our role in the transaction and the variable interests we hold. In most cases, we are not the primary beneficiary of these transactions because we do not have the power to manage the collateral in the VIE.
In addition to our role as arranger, we may have other forms of involvement with these transactions. Such involvement may include acting as underwriter, derivative counterparty, secondary market maker or investor. For certain transactions, we may also act as the servicer, for which we receive fees in connection with that role. We also earn fees for arranging these transactions and distributing the securities.
Asset-based finance structures
We engage in various forms of structured finance arrangements with VIEs that are collateralized by various asset classes including energy contracts, auto and other transportation leases, intellectual property, equipment and general corporate credit. We typically provide senior financing, and may act as an interest rate swap or commodity derivative counterparty when necessary. In most cases, we are not the primary beneficiary of these structures because we do not have power over the significant activities of the VIEs involved in these transactions.
For example, we had investments in asset-backed securities that were collateralized by auto leases or loans and cash reserves. These fixed-rate and variable-rate securities are underwritten by us and have been structured as single-tranche, fully amortizing, unrated bonds that are equivalent to investment-grade securities due to their significant overcollateralization. The securities are issued by SPEs that have been formed by third party auto financing institutions primarily because they require a source of liquidity to fund ongoing vehicle sales operations. The third party auto financing institutions manage the collateral in the VIEs, which is indicative of power in these transactions and we therefore do not consolidate these VIEs.

87


Tax credit structures
We co-sponsor and make investments in affordable housing and sustainable energy projects that are designed to generate a return primarily through the realization of federal tax credits. In some instances, our investments in these structures may require that we fund future capital commitments at the discretion of the project sponsors. While the size of our investment in a single entity may at times exceed 50% of the outstanding equity interests, we do not consolidate these structures due to the project sponsor’s ability to manage the projects, which is indicative of power in these transactions.

86


Investment funds
At JuneSeptember 30, 2010, we had investments of $1.3$1.4 billion and lending arrangements of $18$15 million with certain funds managed by one of our majority owned subsidiaries compared with investments of $1.3 billion and lending arrangements of $20 million at December 31, 2009. In addition, we also provide a default protection agreement to a third party lender to one of these funds. Our involvement in these funds is either senior or of equal priority to third party investors. We do not consolidate the investment funds because we do not absorb the majority of the expected future variability associated with the funds’ assets, including variability associated with credit, interest rate and liquidity risks.
Other transactions with VIEs
In August 2008, Wachovia reached an agreement to purchase at par auction rate securities (ARS) that were sold to third-party investors by certain of its subsidiaries. ARS are debt instruments with long-term maturities, but which re-price more frequently. All remaining ARS issued by VIEs subject to the agreement were redeemed. At JuneSeptember 30, 2010, we held in our securities available-for-sale portfolio $1.9$1.7 billion of ARS issued by VIEs redeemed pursuant to this agreement, compared with $3.2 billion at December 31, 2009.
On November 18, 2009, we reached agreements to purchase additional ARS from eligible investors who bought ARS through one of our broker-dealer subsidiaries. All remaining ARS issued by VIEs subject to the agreement were redeemed. As of June 30, 2010, we had redeemed substantially all of these securities. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2010, we held in our securities available-for-sale portfolio $967$913 million of ARS issued by VIEs redeemed pursuant to this agreement. No securities had been redeemed related to this agreement at December 31, 2009.
We do not consolidate the VIEs that issued the ARS because we do not have power over the activities of the VIEs.
Trust preferred securities
In addition to the involvements disclosed in the followingpreceding table, we had $19.0$18.9 billion of debt financing through the issuance of trust preferred securities at JuneSeptember 30, 2010. In these transactions, VIEs that we wholly own issue preferred equity or debt securities to third party investors. All of the proceeds of the issuance are invested in debt securities that we issue to the VIEs. In certain instances, we may provide liquidity to third party investors that purchase long-term securities that re-price frequently issued by VIEs. The VIEs’ operations and cash flows relate only to the issuance, administration and repayment of the securities held by third parties. We do not consolidate these VIEs because the sole assets of the VIEs are receivables from us. This is the case even though we own all of the voting equity shares of the VIEs, have fully guaranteed the obligations of the VIEs and may have the right to redeem the third party securities under certain circumstances. We report the debt securities that we issue to the VIEs as long-term debt in our consolidated balance sheet.

88


Securitization activity
Activity Related to Unconsolidated VIEs
We use VIEs to securitize consumer and CRE loans and other types of financial assets, including student loans, auto loans and municipal bonds. We typically retain the servicing rights from these sales and may continue to hold other beneficial interests in the VIEs. We may also provide liquidity to investors in the beneficial interests and credit enhancements in the form of standby letters of credit. Through these securitizations we may be exposed to liability under limited amounts of recourse as well as standard representations and warranties we make to purchasers and issuers.

87


We recognized net gains of $6$2 million and $8$10 million from transfers accounted for as sales of financial assets in securitizations in the secondthird quarter and first halfnine months of 2010, respectively, and net gains of $4 million and net losses of $1 million and $5 million, respectively, in the same periods of 2009. Additionally, we had the following cash flows with our securitization trusts that were involved in transfers accounted for as sales.
                                
 
 2010 2009  2010 2009 
 Other Other  Other Other 
 Mortgage financial Mortgage financial  Mortgage financial Mortgage financial 
(in millions) loans assets loans assets  loans assets loans assets 
 
Quarter ended June 30, 
Quarter ended September 30, 
Sales proceeds from securitizations (1) $81,435  120,167   $96,843  103,033  
Servicing fees 1,057 9 1,084 5  1,090 8 1,079 10 
Other interests held 445 132 646 20  448 104 565 12 
Purchases of delinquent assets 10  11   11  13  
Net servicing advances 10  67   16  70  
 
Six months ended June 30, 
Nine months ended September 30, 
Sales proceeds from securitizations (1) $163,757  201,345   $260,600  304,378  
Servicing fees 2,097 18 2,084 23  3,187 26 3,163 33 
Other interests held 852 244 1,163 35  1,300 348 1,728 47 
Purchases of delinquent assets 10  24   21  37  
Net servicing advances 29  129   45  199  
 
(1) Represents cash flow data for all loans securitized in the periods presented.
Second quarter and first half 2010 salesSales with continuing involvement during the third quarter and the first nine months of 2010 predominantly relaterelated to conforming residential mortgage securitizations. During the secondthird quarter and first halfnine months of 2010 we transferred $82.3$97.8 billion and $165.7$263.5 billion, respectively, in conforming residential mortgages to unconsolidated VIEs and recorded the transfers as sales. These transfers did not result in a gain or loss because the loans are already carried at fair value. In connection with these transfers, in the first nine months of 2010 we recorded a $2.0$3.0 billion servicing asset and an $80a $109 million liability for repurchase reserves, which are both measured at fair value using a Level 3 measurement technique.
We used the following key assumptions to measure mortgage servicing assets at the date of securitization:
                                
 
 Quarter ended June 30, Six months ended June 30, Quarter ended Sept. 30, Nine months ended Sept. 30,
 2010 2009 2010 2009  2010 2009 2010 2009 
 
Prepayment speed assumption (annual CPR(1))  13.6% 10.4 13.0 11.3   15.4% 11.5 13.8 11.5 
Expected weighted-average life (in years) 5.4 6.8 5.6 6.5  4.9 6.3 5.4 6.3 
Discount rate assumption  8.0% 8.8 8.2 8.9   7.9% 8.3 8.1 8.7 
 
(1) Constant prepayment rate.

8889


Key economic assumptions and the sensitivity of the current fair value to immediate adverse changes in those assumptions at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, for residential and commercial mortgage servicing rights, and other interests held related primarily to residential mortgage loan securitizations are presented in the following table. In the following table “Other interests held” exclude securities retained in securitizations issued through GSEs such as FNMA, FHLMC and GNMA because we do not believe the value of these securities would be materially affected by the adverse changes in assumptions noted in the table. Subordinated interests include only those bonds whose credit rating was below AAA by a major rating agency at issuance. Senior interests include only those bonds whose credit rating was AAA by a major rating agency at issuance. The information presented excludes trading positions held in inventory.
                 
  
      Other interests held (1) 
  Mortgage  Interest-       
  servicing  only  Subordinated  Senior 
(in millions) rights  strips  bonds (2)  bonds (3) 
 
Fair value of interests held at June 30, 2010 $14,556   208   49   480 
Expected weighted-average life (in years)  4.8   4.4   8.9   6.8 

Prepayment speed assumption (annual CPR)

  15.2%  15.0   4.1   9.4 
Decrease in fair value from:                
10% adverse change $781   10   7   2 
25% adverse change  1,830   20   7   6 

Discount rate assumption

  8.6%  16.1   7.2   7.5 
Decrease in fair value from:                
100 basis point increase $633   8   10   21 
200 basis point increase  1,214   13   12   41 

Credit loss assumption

          0.5%  3.2 
Decrease in fair value from:                
10% higher losses         $7   1 
25% higher losses          7   2 
 
(1)Excludes securities retained in securitizations issued through GSEs such as FNMA, FHLMC and GNMA because we do not believe the value of these securities would be materially affected by the adverse changes in assumptions noted in the table. These GSE securities and other interests held presented in this table are included in debt and equity interests in our disclosure of our involvements with VIEs shown in the first two tables in this Note.
(2)Subordinated interests include only those bonds whose credit rating was below AAA by a major rating agency at issuance.
(3)Senior interests include only those bonds whose credit rating was AAA by a major rating agency at issuance.
                 
 
      Other interests held 
  Mortgage  Interest-       
  servicing  only  Subordinated  Senior 
(in millions) rights  strips  bonds  bonds 
  
Fair value of interests held at September 30, 2010 $13,834   240   47   473 
Expected weighted-average life (in years)  4.5   4.5   8.8   3.7 
Prepayment speed assumption (annual CPR)  15.8%  12.3   4.1   22.2 
Decrease in fair value from:                
10% adverse change $808   8      2 
25% adverse change  1,890   18      5 
Discount rate assumption  8.0%  17.4   7.1   6.6 
Decrease in fair value from:                
100 basis point increase $616   7   3   13 
200 basis point increase  1,180   12   6   26 
Credit loss assumption          0.7%  4.0 
Decrease in fair value from:                
10% higher losses         $   1 
25% higher losses             3 
  
In addition to the interests included in the table above, we have also recorded a reserveliability for mortgage loan repurchase losses, which is included in other commitments and guarantees related to unconsolidated VIEs.losses. The key economic assumptions and the sensitivity of the reserveliability to immediate adverse changes in these assumptions at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, for the reserve for mortgage loan repurchase losses are presented in the following table:
        
 
 Mortgage  Mortgage 
 repurchase  repurchase 
(in millions) reserve  liability 
 
Reserve for mortgage loan repurchase losses held at June 30, 2010 $1,375 
Balance at September 30, 2010 $1,331 

Credit loss assumption

  42.0%  50.0%
Decrease in reserve from: 
Increase in liability from: 
10% higher losses $139  $138 
25% higher losses 347  345 

Repurchase rate assumption

  0.5%  0.4%
Decrease in reserve from: 
10% higher losses $120 
25% higher losses 299 
Increase in liability from: 
10% higher repurchase rates $107 
25% higher repurchase rates 267 
 
The sensitivities in the tables above are hypothetical and caution should be exercised when relying on this data. Changes in value based on variations in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in the assumption to the change in value may not be linear. Also, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the value of the other interests held is calculated independently without changing any other assumptions. In reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in others (for example, changes in prepayment speed estimates could result in changes in the credit losses), which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities.

8990


The table below presents information about the principal balances of off-balance sheet securitized loans, including residential mortgages sold to FNMA, FHLMC and GNMA and securitizations where servicing is our only form of continuing involvement. Delinquent loans include loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest as well as nonaccrual loans. Delinquent loans and net charge-offs exclude loans sold to FNMA, FHLMC and GNMA. We continue to service those loans and would only experience a loss if required to repurchase a delinquent loan due to a breach in original representations and warranties associated with their required underwriting standards.
                         
  
                  Net charge-offs 
                  (recoveries) (3) 
  Total loans (1)  Delinquent loans (2) (3)  Six months ended 
  June 30, Dec. 31, June 30, Dec. 31, June 30,
(in millions) 2010  2009  2010  2009  2010  2009 
 
Commercial and commercial real estate:                        
Commercial $4   78      65       
Real estate mortgage  218,494   221,516   15,314   7,208   143   108 
 
Total commercial and commercial real estate  218,498   221,594   15,314   7,273   143   108 
 
Consumer:                        
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage  1,111,507   1,062,938   6,034   7,501   696   1,287 
Real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage  2   3,292      76      54 
Other revolving credit and installment  82   5,104   6   100      107 
 
Total consumer  1,111,591   1,071,334   6,040   7,677   696   1,448 
 
Total off-balance sheet securitized loans $1,330,089   1,292,928  $21,354   14,950   839   1,556 
  
 
(1)Represents off-balance sheet loans that have been securitized and includes residential mortgages sold to FNMA, FHLMC and GNMA and securitizations where servicing is our only form of continuing involvement.
(2)Delinquent loans are 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest as well as nonaccrual loans.
(3)Delinquent loans and net charge-offs exclude loans sold to FNMA, FHLMC and GNMA. We continue to service the loans and would only experience a loss if required to repurchase a delinquent loan due to a breach in original representations and warranties associated with our underwriting standards.
                         
 
                  Net charge-offs 
                  (recoveries) 
  Total loans  Delinquent loans  Nine months ended 
  Sept. 30, Dec. 31, Sept. 30, Dec. 31, Sept. 30,
(in millions) 2010  2009  2010  2009  2010  2009 
  
Commercial and commercial real estate:                        
Commercial $3   78      65       
Real estate mortgage  215,281   221,516   17,795   7,208   470   58 
  
Total commercial and commercial real estate  215,284   221,594   17,795   7,273   470   58 
  
Consumer:                        
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage  1,123,025   1,062,938   5,706   7,501   1,060   935 
Real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage  3   3,292      76      16 
Other revolving credit and installment  2,502   5,104   107   100      88 
  
Total consumer  1,125,530   1,071,334   5,813   7,677   1,060   1,039 
  
Total off-balance sheet securitized loans $1,340,814   1,292,928  $23,608   14,950   1,530   1,097 
  
  

9091


Transactions with Consolidated VIEs and Secured Borrowings
AThe following table presents a summary of our transactions with VIEstransfers of financial assets accounted for as secured borrowings and involvements with consolidated VIEs. “Consolidated assets” are presented using GAAP measurement methods, which may include fair value, credit impairment or other adjustments, and therefore in some instances will differ from “Total VIE assets.” On the consolidated balance sheet, we separately disclose the consolidated assets of certain VIEs follows:that can only be used to settle the liabilities of those VIEs.
                                        
 
 Carrying value (1)  Carrying value 
 Total Third      Total Third     
 VIE Consolidated party Noncontrolling Net  VIE Consolidated party Noncontrolling Net 
(in millions) assets assets (2) liabilities interests assets  assets assets liabilities interests assets 
 
June 30, 2010
 
September 30, 2010
 

Secured borrowings:

  
Municipal tender option bond securitizations
 $9,540 7,243  (6,763)  480  $9,858 7,768  (6,990)  778 
Auto loan securitizations
 211 210  (56)  154  181 181  (26)  155 
Commercial real estate loans
 1,316 1,316  (1,275)  41  1,316 1,316  (1,273)  43 
Residential mortgage securitizations
 791 693  (480)  213  747 658  (460)  198 
 
Total secured borrowings
 11,858 9,462  (8,574)  888  12,102 9,923  (8,749)  1,174 
 
Consolidated VIEs:
  
Nonconforming residential mortgage loan securitizations
 17,211 16,400  (8,229)  8,171  15,678 14,750  (7,482)  7,268 
Multi-seller commercial paper conduit
 4,383 4,233  (4,328)   (95) 4,194 4,194  (4,319)   (125)
Auto loan securitizations
 1,575 1,574  (1,558)  16  1,203 1,203  (1,171)  32 
Structured asset finance
 153 153  (31)  (11) 111  150 150  (31)  (11) 108 
Investment funds
 2,239 2,056  (609)  (30) 1,417  1,244 1,244  (53)  (14) 1,177 
Other
 1,583 1,580  (1,172)  (15) 393  1,628 1,626  (1,203)  (15) 408 
 
Total consolidated VIEs
 27,144 25,996  (15,927)  (56) 10,013  24,097 23,167  (14,259)  (40) 8,868 
 
Total secured borrowings and consolidated VIEs
 $39,002 35,458  (24,501)  (56) 10,901  $36,199 33,090  (23,008)  (40) 10,042 
 

December 31, 2009

  

Secured borrowings:

  
Municipal tender option bond securitizations (3)(1) $9,649 7,189  (6,856)  333  $9,649 7,189  (6,856)  333 
Auto loan securitizations 274 274  (121)  153  274 274  (121)  153 
Commercial real estate loans 1,309 1,309  (1,269)  40  1,309 1,309  (1,269)  40 
Residential mortgage securitizations 901 792  (552)  240  901 792  (552)  240 
 
Total secured borrowings 12,133 9,564  (8,798)  766  12,133 9,564  (8,798)  766 
 
Consolidated VIEs:  
Structured asset finance 2,791 1,074  (1,088)  (10)  (24) 2,791 1,074  (1,088)  (10)  (24)
Investment funds 2,257 2,245  (271)  (33) 1,941  2,257 2,245  (271)  (33) 1,941 
Other 2,697 1,981  (1,148)  (25) 808  2,697 1,981  (1,148)  (25) 808 
 
Total consolidated VIEs 7,745 5,300  (2,507)  (68) 2,725  7,745 5,300  (2,507)  (68) 2,725 
 
Total secured borrowings and consolidated VIEs $19,878 14,864  (11,305)  (68) 3,491  $19,878 14,864  (11,305)  (68) 3,491 
 
 
(1)Total assets may differ from consolidated assets due to the different measurement methods used depending on the assets’ classifications.
(2)Amounts disclosed in the consolidated balance sheet presentation are limited to VIE assets that can only be used to settle the liabilities of those VIEs.
(3) Balances have been revised to conform with current period presentation.
In addition to the transactions included in the table above, at September 30, 2010, we havehad issued approximately $6.0 billion of private placement debt financing through a consolidated VIE. The issuance is classified as long-term debt in our consolidated financial statements. We haveAt September 30, 2010, we had pledged approximately $6.0$5.9 billion in loans, $562$586 million in securities available for sale and $38$71 million in cash and cash equivalents to collateralize the VIE’s borrowings. Such assets were not transferred to the VIE and accordingly we have excluded the VIE from the previous table.

92


We have raised financing through the securitization of certain financial assets in transactions with VIEs accounted for as secured borrowings. We also consolidate VIEs where we are the primary beneficiary. In certain transactions other than the multi-seller commercial paper conduit, we provide contractual support in the form of limited recourse and liquidity to facilitate the remarketing of short-term securities issued to third party investors. Other than this limited contractual support, the assets of the VIEs are the sole source of repayment of the securities held by third parties. The liquidity support we provide to the multi-seller commercial paper conduit ensures timely repayment of commercial paper issued by the conduit and is described further on the following page.

91


Nonconforming residential mortgage loan securitizations
We have consolidated certain of our nonconforming residential mortgage loan securitizations in accordance with consolidation accounting guidance. We have determined we are the primary beneficiary of these securitizations because we have the power to direct the most significant activities of the entity through our role as primary servicer and also hold variable interests that we have determined to be significant. The nature of our variable interests in these entities may include beneficial interests issued by the VIE, mortgage servicing rights and recourse or repurchase reserve liabilities.
Multi-seller commercial paper conduit
We administer a multi-seller asset-based commercial paper (ABCP) conduit that finances certain client transactions. This conduit is a bankruptcy remote entity that makes loans to, or purchases certificated interests, generally from SPEs, established by our clients (sellers) and which are secured by pools of financial assets. The conduit funds itself through the issuance of highly rated commercial paper to third party investors. The primary source of repayment of the commercial paper is the cash flows from the conduit’s assets or the re-issuance of commercial paper upon maturity. The conduit’s assets are structured with deal-specific credit enhancements generally in the form of overcollateralization provided by the seller, but may also include subordinated interests, cash reserve accounts, third party credit support facilities and excess spread capture. The timely repayment of the commercial paper is further supported by asset-specific liquidity facilities in the form of liquidity asset purchase agreements that we provide. Each facility is equal to 102% of the conduit’s funding commitment to a client. The aggregate amount of liquidity must be equal to or greater than all the commercial paper issued by the conduit. At the discretion of the administrator, we may be required to purchase assets from the conduit at par value plus accrued interest or discount on the related commercial paper, including situations where the conduit is unable to issue commercial paper. Par value may be different from fair value.
We receive fees in connection with our role as administrator and liquidity provider. We may also receive fees related to the structuring of the conduit’s transactions. In first quarter 2010, the conduit terminated its subordinated note to a third party investor and repaid all amounts due under the terms of the note agreement. We incurred a loss on the termination of the subordinated note of $16 million. We are the primary beneficiary of the conduit because we have power over the significant activities of the conduit and have a significant variable interest due to our liquidity arrangement.

9293


8.8. MORTGAGE BANKING ACTIVITIES
Mortgage banking activities, included in the Community Banking and Wholesale Banking operating segments, consist of residential and commercial mortgage originations and servicing.
The changes in residential MSRs measured using the fair value method were:
                                
 
 Quarter ended June 30, Six months ended June 30, Quarter ended Sept. 30, Nine months ended Sept. 30,
(in millions) 2010 2009 2010 2009  2010 2009 2010 2009 
 

Fair value, beginning of period

 $15,544 12,391 16,004 14,714  $13,251 15,690 16,004 14,714 
Adjustments from adoption of consolidation accounting guidance    (118)      (118)  
Acquired from Wachovia (1)    34     34 
Servicing from securitizations or asset transfers 943 2,081 1,997 3,528  1,043 1,517 3,040 5,045 
 
Net additions 943 2,081 1,879 3,562  1,043 1,517 2,922 5,079 
 
Changes in fair value:  
Due to changes in valuation model inputs or assumptions (2)  (2,661) 2,316  (3,438)  (508)  (1,132)  (2,078)  (4,570)  (2,586)
Other changes in fair value (3)  (575)  (1,098)  (1,194)  (2,078)  (676)  (629)  (1,870)  (2,707)
 
Total changes in fair value  (3,236) 1,218  (4,632)  (2,586)  (1,808)  (2,707)  (6,440)  (5,293)
 
Fair value, end of period $13,251 15,690 13,251 15,690  $12,486 14,500 12,486 14,500 
 
 
(1) Reflects refinements to initial purchase accounting adjustments.
(2) Principally reflects changes in discount rates and prepayment speed assumptions, mostly due to changes in interest rates.
(3) Represents changes due to collection/realization of expected cash flows over time.
The changes in amortized commercial MSRs were:
                                
 
 Quarter ended June 30, Six months ended June 30, Quarter ended Sept. 30, Nine months ended Sept. 30,
(in millions) 2010 2009 2010 2009  2010 2009 2010 2009 
 

Balance, beginning of period

 $1,069 1,257 1,119 1,446  $1,037 1,205 1,119 1,446 
Adjustments from adoption of consolidation accounting guidance    (5)      (5)  
Purchases (1) 7 6 8 10  14  22 10 
Acquired from Wachovia (2)(1)   (8)   (135)     (135)
Servicing from securitizations or asset transfers (1) 17 18 28 22  18 21 46 43 
Amortization  (56)  (68)  (113)  (138)  (56)  (64)  (169)  (202)
 
Balance, end of period (3)(2) $1,037 1,205 1,037 1,205  $1,013 1,162 1,013 1,162 
 
Fair value of amortized MSRs:  
Beginning of period $1,283 1,392 1,261 1,555  $1,307 1,311 1,261 1,555 
End of period 1,307 1,311 1,307 1,311  1,349 1,277 1,349 1,277 
 
(1)Based on June 30, 2010, assumptions, the weighted-average amortization period for MSRs added during the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010, was approximately 16.5 and 17.4 years, respectively.
(2) Reflects refinements to initial purchase accounting adjustments.
(3)(2) There was no valuation allowance recorded for the periods presented. Commercial MSRs are evaluated for impairment purposes by the following asset classes: agency and non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities (MBS), and loans.

9394


We present the components of our managed servicing portfolio in the table below at unpaid principal balance for loans serviced and subserviced for others and at book value for owned loans serviced.
                
 
 June 30, Dec. 31, Sept. 30, Dec. 31,
(in billions) 2010 2009  2010 2009 
 

Residential mortgage servicing:

  
Serviced for others $1,437 1,422  $1,433 1,422 
Owned loans serviced 365 364  365 364 
Subservicing 10 10  10 10 
 
Total residential servicing 1,812 1,796  1,808 1,796 
 
Commercial mortgage servicing:  
Serviced for others 441 454  439 454 
Owned loans serviced 100 105  99 105 
Subservicing 10 10  10 10 
 
Total commercial servicing 551 569  548 569 
 
Total managed servicing portfolio $2,363 2,365  $2,356 2,365 
 
Total serviced for others $1,878 1,876  $1,872 1,876 
Ratio of MSRs to related loans serviced for others  0.76% 0.91   0.72% 0.91 
 
The components of mortgage banking noninterest income were:
                                
 
 Quarter ended June 30, Six months ended June 30, Quarter ended Sept. 30, Nine months ended Sept. 30,
(in millions) 2010 2009 2010 2009  2010 2009 2010 2009 
 

Servicing income, net:

  
Servicing fees $1,223 951 2,276 2,032  $1,192 1,085 3,468 3,117 
Changes in fair value of residential MSRs:  
Due to changes in valuation model inputs or assumptions (1)  (2,661) 2,316  (3,438)  (508)  (1,132)  (2,078)  (4,570)  (2,586)
Other changes in fair value (2)  (575)  (1,098)  (1,194)  (2,078)  (676)  (629)  (1,870)  (2,707)
 
Total changes in fair value of residential MSRs  (3,236) 1,218  (4,632)  (2,586)  (1,808)  (2,707)  (6,440)  (5,293)
Amortization  (56)  (68)  (113)  (138)  (56)  (64)  (169)  (202)
Net derivative gains (losses) from economic hedges (3) 3,287  (1,285) 5,053 2,414 
Net derivative gains from economic hedges (3) 1,188 3,605 6,241 6,019 
 
Total servicing income, net 1,218 816 2,584 1,722  516 1,919 3,100 3,641 
Net gains on mortgage loan origination/sales activities 793 2,230 1,897 3,828  1,983 1,148 3,880 4,976 
 
Total mortgage banking noninterest income $2,011 3,046 4,481 5,550  $2,499 3,067 6,980 8,617 
 
Market-related valuation changes to MSRs, net of hedge results (1)+(3) $626 1,031 1,615 1,906  $56 1,527 1,671 3,433 
 
 
(1) Principally reflects changes in discount rates and prepayment speed assumptions, mostly due to changes in interest rates.
(2) Represents changes due to collection/realization of expected cash flows over time.
(3) Represents results from free-standing derivatives (economic hedges) used to hedge the risk of changes in fair value of MSRs. See Note 11 — Free-Standing Derivatives in this Report for additional discussion and detail.
Servicing fees includeare presented net of certain unreimbursed direct servicing obligations primarily associated with workout activities. In addition, servicing fees in the table above included:
                                
 
 Quarter ended June 30, Six months ended June 30, Quarter ended Sept. 30, Nine months ended Sept. 30,
(in millions) 2010 2009 2010 2009  2010 2009 2010 2009 
 
Contractually specified servicing fees $1,154 1,109 2,261 2,192  $1,160 1,132 3,421 3,324 
Late charges 88 79 178 166  100 80 278 246 
Ancillary fees 111 75 217 148  111 59 328 207 
 

9495


9.9. INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The gross carrying value of intangible assets and accumulated amortization was:
                                                
 
 June 30, 2010 December 31, 2009  September 30, 2010 December 31, 2009 
 Gross Net Gross Net  Gross Net Gross Net 
 carrying Accumulated carrying carrying Accumulated carrying  carrying Accumulated carrying carrying Accumulated carrying 
(in millions) value amortization value value amortization value  value amortization value value amortization value 
 
 
Amortized intangible assets:  
MSRs (1) $1,633 596 1,037 1,606 487 1,119  $1,665 652 1,013 1,606 487 1,119 
Core deposit intangibles 15,135 5,296 9,839 15,140 4,366 10,774  15,133 5,763 9,370 15,140 4,366 10,774 
Customer relationship and other intangibles 3,077 1,063 2,014 3,050 896 2,154 
Customer relationship and 
other intangibles 3,078 1,147 1,931 3,050 896 2,154 
 
Total amortized intangible assets $19,845 6,955 12,890 19,796 5,749 14,047  $19,876 7,562 12,314 19,796 5,749 14,047 
 
MSRs (carried at fair value) (1) $13,251  13,251 16,004  16,004  $12,486  12,486 16,004  16,004 
Goodwill 24,820  24,820 24,812  24,812  24,831  24,831 24,812  24,812 
Trademark 14  14 14  14  14  14 14  14 
 
(1) See Note 8 in this Report for additional information on MSRs.
The following table provides the current year and estimated future amortization expense for amortized intangible assets as of JuneSeptember 30, 2010.
                                
 
 Customer    Customer   
 Amortized Core relationship    Amortized Core relationship   
 commercial deposit and other    commercial deposit and other   
(in millions) MSRs intangibles intangibles (1) Total  MSRs intangibles intangibles (1) Total 
 
 
Six months ended June 30, 2010 (actual)
 $113 937 163 1,213 
Nine months ended September 30, 2010 (actual)
 $168 1,406 248 1,822 
 
Estimate for year ending December 31,  
2010 $223 1,869 330 2,422  $223 1,872 331 2,426 
2011 205 1,593 287 2,085  208 1,593 288 2,089 
2012 167 1,396 270 1,833  170 1,396 269 1,835 
2013 130 1,241 254 1,625  134 1,241 252 1,627 
2014 113 1,113 234 1,460  115 1,113 234 1,462 
2015 105 1,022 212 1,339  107 1,022 212 1,341 
 
(1) Includes amortization of lease intangibles reported in occupancy expense of $5$4 million for the first sixnine months of 2010, and estimated amortization of $9$6 million, $9 million, $8 million, $8 million, $5 million, and $4 million for 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively.
We based our projections of amortization expense shown above on existing asset balances at JuneSeptember 30, 2010. Future amortization expense may vary from these projections.

9596


For our goodwill impairment analysis, we allocate all of the goodwill to the individual operating segments. We identify reporting units that are one level below an operating segment (referred to as a component), and distinguish these reporting units based on how the segments and components are managed, taking into consideration the economic characteristics, nature of the products and customers of the components. We allocate goodwill to reporting units based on relative fair value, using certain performance metrics. In first quarter 2010, we revised prior period information to reflect this realignment. See Note 16 in this Report for further information on management reporting.
The following table shows the allocation of goodwill to our operating segments for purposes of goodwill impairment testing. The additions in the first halfnine months of 2009 predominantly relate to goodwill recorded in connection with refinements to our initial acquisition date purchase accounting.
                                
 
 Wealth,    Wealth,   
 Community Wholesale Brokerage and Consolidated  Community Wholesale Brokerage and Consolidated 
(in millions) Banking Banking Retirement Company  Banking Banking Retirement Company 
 
 
Balance, December 31, 2008 $16,810 5,449 368 22,627  $16,810 5,449 368 22,627 
Goodwill from business combinations 1,240 750  1,990  926 493  1,419 
Foreign currency translation adjustments 2   2  6   6 
 
Balance, June 30, 2009 $18,052 6,199 368 24,619 
Balance, September 30, 2009 $17,742 5,942 368 24,052 
 
Balance, December 31, 2009
 $18,160 6,279 373 24,812  $18,160 6,279 373 24,812 
Goodwill from business combinations
  8  8   19  19 
 
Balance, June 30, 2010
 $18,160 6,287 373 24,820 
Balance, September 30, 2010
 $18,160 6,298 373 24,831 
 
 

9697


10.10. GUARANTEES AND LEGAL ACTIONS
Guarantees
Guarantees are contracts that contingently require us to make payments to a guaranteed party based on an event or a change in an underlying asset, liability, rate or index. Guarantees are generally in the form of standby letters of credit, securities lending and other indemnifications, liquidity agreements, written put options, recourse obligations, residual value guarantees, and contingent consideration. The following table shows carrying value, maximum exposure to loss on our guarantees and the amount with a higher risk of performance.
                                                
 
 June 30, 2010 Dec. 31, 2009  September 30, 2010 December 31, 2009 
 Maximum Non- Maximum Non-  Maximum Non- Maximum Non- 
 Carrying exposure investment Carrying exposure investment  Carrying exposure investment Carrying exposure investment 
(in millions) value to loss grade value to loss grade  value to loss grade value to loss grade 
   
Standby letters of credit $148 46,701 20,251 148 49,997 21,112  $147 45,159 19,791 148 49,997 21,112 
Securities lending and other indemnifications 49 11,398 798 51 20,002 2,512  49 14,032 4,326 51 20,002 2,512 
Liquidity agreements (1)  62  66 7,744    55 1 66 7,744  
Written put options (1)(2) 1,205 8,353 4,095 803 8,392 3,674  953 7,530 3,348 803 8,392 3,674 
Loans sold with recourse 116 5,202 3,357 96 5,049 2,400  116 5,280 3,554 96 5,049 2,400 
Residual value guarantees 8 197  8 197   8 197  8 197  
Contingent consideration 15 101 98 11 145 102  18 90 88 11 145 102 
Other guarantees  99 2  55 2   75 2  55 2 
 
Total guarantees $1,541 72,113 28,601 1,183 91,581 29,802  $1,291 72,418 31,110 1,183 91,581 29,802 
 
 
(1) Certain of these agreements are related to off-balance sheet entities and, accordingly, are also disclosed in Note 7 in this Report.
(2) Written put options, which are in the form of derivatives, are also included in the derivative disclosures in Note 11 in this Report.
“Maximum exposure to loss” and “Non-investment grade” are required disclosures under GAAP. Non-investment grade represents those guarantees on which we have a higher risk of being required to perform under the terms of the guarantee. If the underlying assets under the guarantee are non-investment grade (that is, an external rating that is below investment grade or an internal credit default grade that is equivalent to a below investment grade external rating), we consider the risk of performance to be high. Internal credit default grades are determined based upon the same credit policies that we use to evaluate the risk of payment or performance when making loans and other extensions of credit. These credit policies are more fully described in Note 5 in this Report.
Maximum exposure to loss represents the estimated loss that would be incurred under an assumed hypothetical circumstance, despite what we believe is its extremely remote possibility, where the value of our interests and any associated collateral declines to zero, without any consideration of recovery or offset from any economic hedges. Accordingly, this required disclosure is not an indication of expected loss. We believe the carrying value, which is either fair value or cost adjusted for incurred credit losses, is more representative of our exposure to loss than maximum exposure to loss.
Standby letters of credit
We issue standby letters of credit, which include performance and financial guarantees, for customers in connection with contracts between our customers and third parties. Standby letters of credit are agreements where we are obligated to make payment to a third party on behalf of a customer in the event the customer fails to meet their contractual obligations. We consider the credit risk in standby letters of credit and commercial and similar letters of credit in determining the allowance for credit losses.

97

Securities lending and other indemnifications


As a securities lending agent, we loan clientlend securities on a fully collateralized basis,from participating institutional clients portfolios to third partythird-party borrowers. We indemnify our clients against default by the borrower default of a return of those securities and, in certain cases, againstreturning these lent

98


securities. This indemnity is supported by collateral losses. We support these guarantees with collateral,received from the borrowers. Collateral is generally in the form of cash or highly liquid securities that isare marked to market daily. There was $11.7$14.4 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, and $20.7 billion at December 31, 2009, in collateral supporting loaned securities with values of $11.4$14.0 billion and $20.0 billion, respectively.
We enter into other types of indemnification agreements in the ordinary course of business under which we agree to indemnify third parties against any damages, losses and expenses incurred in connection with legal and other proceedings arising from relationships or transactions with us. These relationships or transactions include those arising from service as a director or officer of the Company, underwriting agreements relating to our securities, acquisition agreements and various other business transactions or arrangements. Because the extent of our obligations under these agreements depends entirely upon the occurrence of future events, our potential future liability under these agreements is not determinable.
Liquidity agreements
We provide liquidity facilities on all commercial paper issued by the conduit we administer. We also provide liquidity to certain off-balance sheet entities that hold securitized fixed-rate municipal bonds and consumer or commercial assets that are partially funded with the issuance of money market and other short-term notes. The decrease in maximum exposure to loss from December 31, 2009, is due to the amounts related to the liquidity facility on the commercial paper conduit being removed from the disclosed amounts due to the consolidation of the commercial paper conduit upon adoption of consolidation accounting guidance. See Note 7 in this Report for additional information on these arrangements.
Written put options
Written put options are contracts that give the counterparty the right to sell to us an underlying instrument held by the counterparty at a specified price, and include options, floors, caps and credit default swaps. These written put option contracts generally permit net settlement. While these derivative transactions expose us to risk in the event the option is exercised, we manage this risk by entering into offsetting trades or by taking short positions in the underlying instrument. We offset substantially all put options written to customers with purchased options. Additionally, for certain of these contracts, we require the counterparty to pledge the underlying instrument as collateral for the transaction. Our ultimate obligation under written put options is based on future market conditions and is only quantifiable at settlement. See Note 7 in this Report for additional information regarding transactions with VIEs and Note 11 in this Report for additional information regarding written derivative contracts.
Loans sold with recourse
In certain loan sales or securitizations, we provide recourse to the buyer whereby we are required to repurchase loans at par value plus accrued interest on the occurrence of certain credit-related events within a certain period of time. The maximum exposure to loss represents the outstanding principal balance of the loans sold or securitized that are subject to recourse provisions, but the likelihood of the repurchase of the entire balance is remote and amounts paid can be recovered in whole or in part from the sale of collateral. In secondthird quarter 2010, we did not repurchase a significant amount of loans associated with these agreements.
Residual value guarantees
We have provided residual value guarantees as part of certain leasing transactions of corporate assets. At JuneSeptember 30, 2010, the only remaining residual value guarantee is related to a leasing transaction on certain corporate buildings. The lessors in these leases are generally large financial institutions or their leasing subsidiaries. These guarantees protect the lessor from loss on sale of the related asset at the end of the lease term. To the extent that a sale of the leased assets results in proceeds less than a stated percent (generally

99


(generally 80% to 89%) of the asset’s cost, we would be required to reimburse the lessor under our guarantee.

98

Contingent consideration


In connection with certain brokerage, asset management, insurance agency and other acquisitions we have made, the terms of the acquisition agreements provide for deferred payments or additional consideration, based on certain performance targets.
We have entered into various contingent performance guarantees through credit risk participation arrangements. Under these agreements, if a customer defaults on its obligation to perform under certain credit agreements with third parties, we will be required to make payments to the third parties.
Legal Actions
The following supplements and amends our discussion of certain matters previously reported in Item 3 (Legal Proceedings) of our 2009 Form 10-K and our 2010 First and Second Quarter Form 10-Q for events occurring in secondthird quarter 2010.
Data TreasuryAdelphia Litigation On June 15,September 21, 2010, an agreement in principle was reached between the Adelphia Resolution Trust and all of the defendant banks to settle the remaining claims against the Banks. The agreement is subject to approval by the Court. A hearing on approval of the settlement is scheduled for November 18, 2010.
ERISA Litigation On August 6, 2010, an order was entered by the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina dismissing, with prejudice, the plaintiffs’ complaint in theIn re Wachovia Corporation ERISA Litigationcase. Plaintiffs have appealed. On October 18, 2010, an agreement in principle was reached to settle theFigas v. Wells Fargo entered into a confidential settlement& Company, et al. case. The agreement which settled all claims of Data Treasury against Wells Fargois subject to approval by the Court and Wachovia. The estimated liability for this matter had been accrued for in previous quarters and the settlement did not have a material adverse effect on Wells Fargo’s consolidated financial statements for the period ended June 30, 2010.an independent fiduciary.
Golden West and Related Litigation Amended complaints wereTwo individual shareholder actions in South Carolina have been dismissed and the shareholders have appealed.
Municipal Derivatives Bid Practice Investigation On September 21, 2010 a complaint, captionedActive Retirement Community, Inc. d/b/a Jefferson’s Ferry v. Bank of America, N.A., et al.,was filed in all the actions in May 2010U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The case asserts claims against Wachovia Bank, N.A. and renewed motionsWells Fargo & Company that are substantially similar to dismissother previously disclosed civil cases.
Order of Posting Litigation A series of putative class actions have been filed against Wachovia Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as well as many other banks, challenging the high to low order in each case.which the Banks post debit card transactions to consumer deposit accounts. There are currently twelve such cases pending against Wells Fargo Bank (including the Wachovia Bank cases to which Wells Fargo succeeded), all but three of which have been consolidated in multi-district litigation proceedings in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. On August 10, 2010, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California issued an order inGutierrez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., one of the three cases that were not consolidated in the multi-district proceedings, enjoining the Bank’s use of the high to low posting method for debit card transactions with respect to the plaintiff class of California depositors, directing that the Bank establish a different posting methodology and ordering remediation in the approximate amount of $203 million. On October 26, 2010, a final judgment was entered inGutierrez. Wells Fargo will appeal.

100


In Re Wells Fargo Mortgage-Backed Certificates Litigation and Related Mortgage Litigation and Investigations On May 28, 2010, plaintiffs filed an amended consolidated complaint. On June 25,October 5, 2010, Wells Fargo movedFargo’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint. complaint in the Northern District of California was granted in part and denied in part.
On June 29, 2010 and on JulyOctober 15, 2010, two complaints,three actions, captionedFederal Home Loan Bank of Chicago v. Banc of America Funding Corporation, et al. (filed in the first captionedCook CountyCircuit Court, State of Illinois);The Charles Schwab Corporation vs. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.,Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago v. Banc of America Securities LLC, et al.,and the second captionedThe Charles Schwab Corporation v. BNP Paribas Securities Corp., et al.,were (filed in the Superior Court forof the State of California San Franciscofor the County against a number of Los Angeles); andFederal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis v. Banc of America Mortgage America Securities, Inc., et al.(filed in the Superior Court of the State of Indiana for the County of Marion), named multiple defendants, includingdescribed as issuers/depositors, and underwriters/dealers of private label mortgage-backed securities, in an action asserting claims that defendants used false and misleading statements in offering documents for the sale of such securities. The Bank of Chicago asserts that it purchased approximately $4.2 billion and the Bank of Indianapolis asserts that it purchased nearly $3 billion of such securities from the defendants. Plaintiffs seek rescission of the sales and damages under state securities and other laws and Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933. Wells Fargo Asset Securities Corporation, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Asset Securities Corporation. As& Company were named among the defendants. In addition, various class actions have been filed against the Wells Fargo entities, the new cases assert opt out claims relating to the claims alleged in the Mortgage-Backed Certificates Litigation.
LeNature’s Inc. On July 7, 2010, the demurrer to the California noteholder action was overruled. On May 10, 2010, the New York State Court granted the motion to dismiss two countsBank, N.A. and other banks challenging aspects of the complaintforeclosure process, alleging, among other things, that banks improperly split notes and deniedmortgages, use inappropriate foreclosure plaintiffs, misapply payments in violation of the motionterms of notes and mortgages, and submit fraudulent and inaccurate foreclosure affidavits. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. has received inquiries from state Attorneys General, other state and federal regulators and officers, and legislative committees into its mortgage foreclosure practices and procedures. Wells Fargo is appropriately responding to dismiss two other counts.
Municipal Derivatives Bid Practice Investigation In May 2010, four additional complaints were filed in California state courts by four additional California municipalities containing allegations virtually identicalthese inquiries as well as internally reviewing its practices and procedures. At present, Wells Fargo cannot estimate the possible loss or range of loss with respect to the allegations ofconcerning the eleven complaints previously filed by various California municipalities.mortgage related litigation and investigations described above.
Outlook In accordance with ASC 450 (formerly FAS 5), Wells Fargo has established estimated liabilities for litigation matters with loss contingencies that are both probable and estimable. For these matters and others where an unfavorable outcome is reasonably possible but not probable, there may be a range of possible losses in excess of the estimated liability that cannot be estimated. Based on information currently available, advice of counsel, available insurance coverage and established reserves, Wells Fargo believes that the eventual outcome of the actions against Wells Fargo and/or its subsidiaries, including the matters described above, will not, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on Wells Fargo’s consolidated financial statements. However, in the event of unexpected future developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of those matters, if unfavorable, may be material to Wells Fargo’s consolidated financial statements for any particular period.

99


11.11. DERIVATIVES
We use derivatives to manage exposure to market risk, interest rate risk, credit risk and foreign currency risk, to generate profits from proprietary trading and to assist customers with their risk management objectives. Derivative transactions are measured in terms of the notional amount, but this amount is not recorded on the balance sheet and is not, when viewed in isolation, a meaningful measure of the risk profile of the instruments. The notional amount is generally not exchanged, but is used only as the basis on which interest and other payments are determined. Our approach to managing interest rate risk includes the use of derivatives. This helps minimize significant, unplanned fluctuations in earnings, fair values of assets and liabilities, and cash flows caused by interest rate volatility. This approach involves modifying the repricing characteristics of certain assets and liabilities so that changes in interest rates do not have a significant adverse effect on the net interest margin and cash flows. As a result of interest rate fluctuations, hedged assets and liabilities will gain or lose market value. In a fair value hedging strategy,

101


the effect of this unrealized gain or loss will generally be offset by the gain or loss on the derivatives linked to the hedged assets and liabilities. In a cash flow hedging strategy, we manage the variability of cash payments due to interest rate fluctuations by the effective use of derivatives linked to hedged assets and liabilities.
We use derivatives that are designed as qualifying hedge contracts as defined by the Derivatives and Hedging topic in the Codification as part of our interest rate and foreign currency risk management, including interest rate swaps, caps and floors, futures and forward contracts, and options. We also offer various derivatives, including interest rate, commodity, equity, credit and foreign exchange contracts, to our customers but usually offset our exposure from such contracts by purchasing other financial contracts. The customer accommodations and any offsetting financial contracts are treated as free-standing derivatives. Free-standing derivatives also include derivatives we enter into for risk management that do not otherwise qualify for hedge accounting, including economic hedge derivatives. To a lesser extent, we take positions based on market expectations or to benefit from price differentials between financial instruments and markets. Additionally, free-standing derivatives include embedded derivatives that are required to be separately accounted for from their host contracts.
Our derivative activities are monitored by the Corporate Asset/Liability Management Committee (Corporate ALCO). Our Treasury function, which includes asset/liability management, is responsible for various hedging strategies developed through analysis of data from financial models and other internal and industry sources. We incorporate the resulting hedging strategies into our overall interest rate risk management and trading strategies.

100


The following table presents the total notional or contractual amounts and fair values for derivatives, were:the fair values of derivatives designated as qualifying hedge contracts, which are used as asset/liability management hedges, and free-standing derivatives (economic hedges) not designated as hedging instruments are recorded on the balance sheet in other assets or other liabilities. Customer accommodation, trading and other free-standing derivatives are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value in trading assets or other liabilities.

102


                                                
 
 June 30, 2010 Dec. 31, 2009  September 30, 2010 December 31, 2009 
 Notional or Fair value Notional or Fair value  Notional or Fair value Notional or Fair value 
 contractual Asset Liability contractual Asset Liability  contractual Asset Liability contractual Asset Liability 
(in millions) amount derivatives derivatives amount derivatives derivatives  amount derivatives derivatives amount derivatives derivatives 
 
 
Qualifying hedge contracts(1)
 
Interest rate contracts (2) $111,021 8,401 1,967 119,966 6,425 1,302 
Qualifying hedge contracts
 
Interest rate contracts (1) $109,967 9,345 2,370 119,966 6,425 1,302 
Foreign exchange contracts 28,173 813 1,290 30,212 1,553 811  26,989 2,063 541 30,212 1,553 811 
         
Total derivatives designated as qualifying hedging instruments 9,214 3,257 7,978 2,113  11,408 2,911 7,978 2,113 
         
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
  
Free-standing derivatives (economic hedges) (1): 
Interest rate contracts (3) 497,218 6,153 5,400 633,734 4,441 4,873 
Free-standing derivatives (economic hedges): 
Interest rate contracts (2) 517,729 3,249 2,673 633,734 4,441 4,873 
Equity contracts    300  2     300  2 
Foreign exchange contracts 3,788 23 23 7,019 233 29  1,881 11 58 7,019 233 29 
Credit contracts — protection purchased 490 133  577 261   437 103  577 261  
Other derivatives 4,516  104 4,583  40  4,474  91 4,583  40 
         
Subtotal 6,309 5,527 4,935 4,944  3,363 2,822 4,935 4,944 
         
Customer accommodation, trading and other free-standing derivatives (4): 
Customer accommodation, trading 
and other free-standing derivatives: 
Interest rate contracts 2,649,776 66,789 66,951 2,741,119 54,873 54,033  2,752,345 79,129 79,689 2,741,119 54,873 54,033 
Commodity contracts 84,307 3,669 3,563 92,182 5,400 5,182  77,405 4,142 4,138 92,182 5,400 5,182 
Equity contracts 70,340 2,906 2,891 71,572 2,459 3,067  74,316 3,121 3,193 71,572 2,459 3,067 
Foreign exchange contracts 140,803 3,802 3,363 142,012 3,084 2,737  157,496 3,326 3,105 142,012 3,084 2,737 
Credit contracts — protection sold 59,743 524 7,838 76,693 979 9,577  50,972 555 6,748 76,693 979 9,577 
Credit contracts — protection purchased 61,700 6,764 530 81,357 9,349 1,089  50,098 5,633 542 81,357 9,349 1,089 
Other derivatives 279 9 22 2,314 427 171  283 13 12 2,314 427 171 
         
Subtotal 84,463 85,158 76,571 75,856  95,919 97,427 76,571 75,856 
         
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments 90,772 90,685 81,506 80,800  99,282 100,249 81,506 80,800 
        
Total derivatives before netting 99,986 93,942 89,484 82,913  110,690 103,160 89,484 82,913 
         
Netting (5)(3)  (74,396)  (82,310)  (65,926)  (73,303)  (87,944)  (95,368)  (65,926)  (73,303)
         
Total $25,590 11,632 23,558 9,610  $22,746 7,792 23,558 9,610 
 
 
(1) Represents asset/liability management hedges, which are included in other assets or other liabilities.
(2)Notional amounts presented exclude $21.0$20.9 billion at Juneboth September 30, 2010, and $20.9 billion at December 31, 2009, of basis swaps that are combined with receive fixed-rate / pay floating-rate swaps and designated as one hedging instrument.
(3)(2) Includes free-standing derivatives (economic hedges) used to hedge the risk of changes in the fair value of residential MSRs, MHFS, interest rate lock commitments and other interests held.
(4)Customer accommodation, trading and other free-standing derivatives are included in trading assets or other liabilities.
(5)(3) Represents netting of derivative asset and liability balances, and related cash collateral, with the same counterparty subject to master netting arrangements under the accounting guidance covering the offsetting of amounts related to certain contracts. The amount of cash collateral netted against derivative assets and liabilities was $5.6$6.5 billion and $13.6$14.0 billion, respectively, at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, and $5.3 billion and $14.1 billion, respectively, at December 31, 2009.
Fair Value Hedges
We use interest rate swaps to convert certain of our fixed-rate long-term debt and certificates of deposit (CDs) to floating rates to hedge our exposure to interest rate risk. We also enter into cross-currency swaps, cross-currency interest rate swaps and forward contracts to hedge our exposure to foreign currency risk and interest rate risk associated with the issuance of non-U.S. dollar denominated long-term debt and repurchase agreements. Consistent with our asset/liability management strategy of converting fixed-rate debt to floating-rates, we believe interest expense should reflect only the current contractual interest cash flows on the liabilities and the related swaps. In addition, we use interest rate swaps and forward contracts to hedge against changes in fair value of certain debt securities that are classified as securities available for sale, due to changes in interest rates, foreign currency rates, or both. For fair value hedges of long-term debt, CDs, repurchase agreements and debt securities, all parts of each derivative’s gain or loss due to the hedged risk are included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness, except for

101


foreign-currency denominated securities available for sale, short-term borrowings and long-term debt hedged with forward derivatives for which the component of the derivative gain or loss related to the

103


changes in the difference between the spot and forward price is excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness.
For fair value hedging relationships, we use statistical regression analysis to assess hedge effectiveness, both at inception of the hedging relationship and on an ongoing basis. The regression analysis involves regressing the periodic change in fair value of the hedging instrument against the periodic changes in fair value of the asset or liability being hedged due to changes in the hedged risk(s). The assessment includes an evaluation of the quantitative measures of the regression results used to validate the conclusion of high effectiveness.
The following table shows the net gains (losses) recognized in the income statement related to derivatives in fair value hedging relationships as defined by the Derivatives and Hedging topic in the Codification.
                        
                        
  Interest rate     
 Interest rate      contracts hedging: Foreign exchange contracts hedging:   
 contracts hedging: Foreign exchange contracts hedging: Total net  Total net 
 Securities Securities gains (losses)  Securities Securities gains (losses) 
 available Long-term available Short-term Long-term on fair value  available Long-term available Short-term Long-term on fair value 
(in millions) for sale debt for sale borrowings debt hedges  for sale debt for sale borrowings debt hedges 
 
 
Quarter ended June 30, 2010
 

Quarter ended September 30, 2010

 
Gains (losses) recorded in net interest income
 $(94) 527  (1)  87 519  $(93) 550   98 555 
   
Gains (losses) recorded in noninterest income
  
Recognized on derivatives
 $(642) 1,744 70   (1,769)  (597) $(443) 1,168 111  2,090 2,926 
Recognized on hedged item
 650  (1,626)  (70)  1,778 732  462  (1,110)  (112)   (2,133)  (2,893)
 
Recognized on fair value hedges (ineffective portion) (1)
 $8 118   9 135 
Recognized on fair value hedges (ineffective portion)
 $19 58  (1)   (43)  33(1)
 
 
Quarter ended June 30, 2009 

Quarter ended September 30, 2009

 
Gains (losses) recorded in net interest income $(71) 383  (18) 12 78 384  $(84) 484  (7)  94 487 
   
Gains (losses) recorded in noninterest income  
Recognized on derivatives $712  (2,680)  (2) 1 1,204  (765) $(242) 1,292  (1)  270 1,319 
Recognized on hedged item  (703) 2,585 2  (1)  (1,281) 602  253  (1,297) 1   (266)  (1,309)
 
Recognized on fair value hedges (ineffective portion) (1) $9  (95)    (77)  (163)
Recognized on fair value hedges (ineffective portion) $11  (5)   4  10(1)
 
 
Six months ended June 30, 2010
 

Nine months ended September 30, 2010

 
Gains (losses) recorded in net interest income
 $(188) 1,058  (2)  184 1,052  $(281) 1,608  (2)  282 1,607 
              
Gains (losses) recorded in noninterest income
  
Recognized on derivatives
 $(768) 2,276 189   (2,905)  (1,208) $(1,211) 3,444 300   (815) 1,718 
Recognized on hedged item
 785  (2,143)  (189)  2,932 1,385  1,247  (3,253)  (301)  799  (1,508)
 
Recognized on fair value hedges (ineffective portion) (1)
 $17 133   27 177 
Recognized on fair value hedges (ineffective portion)
 $36 191  (1)   (16)  210(1)
 
 
Six months ended June 30, 2009 

Nine months ended September 30, 2009

 
Gains (losses) recorded in net interest income $(112) 647  (46) 28 154 671  $(196) 1,131  (53) 28 248 1,158 
   
Gains (losses) recorded in noninterest income  
Recognized on derivatives $794  (3,469)   942  (1,733) $552  (2,177)  (1)  1,212  (414)
Recognized on hedged item  (796) 3,383    (951) 1,636   (543) 2,086 1   (1,217) 327 
 
Recognized on fair value hedges (ineffective portion) (1) $(2)  (86)    (9)  (97)
Recognized on fair value hedges (ineffective portion) $9  (91)    (5)  (87)(1)
 
 
(1) SecondThird quarter and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010, included nil$(1) million and $1 million,nil, respectively, and secondthird quarter and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009, included $(7)$(2) million for both periods,and $(9) million, respectively, of gains (losses) on forward derivatives hedging foreign currency securities available for sale, short-term borrowings and long-term debt, representing the portion of derivatives gains (losses) excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness (time value).

102104


Cash Flow Hedges
We hedge floating-rate debt against future interest rate increases by using interest rate swaps, caps, floors and futures to limit variability of cash flows due to changes in the benchmark interest rate. We also use interest rate swaps and floors to hedge the variability in interest payments received on certain floating-rate commercial loans, due to changes in the benchmark interest rate. Gains and losses on derivatives that are reclassified from cumulative OCI to current period earnings are included in the line item in which the hedged item’s effect on earnings is recorded. All parts of gain or loss on these derivatives are included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness. For all cash flow hedges, we assess hedge effectiveness using regression analysis, both at inception of the hedging relationship and on an ongoing basis. The regression analysis involves regressing the periodic changes in cash flows of the hedging instrument against the periodic changes in cash flows of the forecasted transaction being hedged due to changes in the hedged risk(s). The assessment includes an evaluation of the quantitative measures of the regression results used to validate the conclusion of high effectiveness.
We expect that $305$336 million of deferred net gains on derivatives in OCI at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, will be reclassified as earnings during the next twelve months, compared with $284 million at December 31, 2009. We are hedging our exposure to the variability of future cash flows for all forecasted transactions for a maximum of 8 years for both hedges of floating-rate debt and floating-rate commercial loans.
The following table shows the net gains (losses) recognized related to derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships as defined by the Derivatives and Hedging topic in the Codification.
                 
  
  Quarter ended June 30, Six months ended June 30,
(in millions) 2010  2009  2010  2009 
 
 
Gains (losses) (after tax) recognized in OCI on derivatives (effective portion) $190   (196)  349   (128)
Gains (pre tax) reclassified from cumulative                
OCI into net interest income (effective portion)  186   144   328   279 
Gains (losses) (pre tax) recognized in noninterest income on derivatives (ineffective portion) (1)  (1)  5   6   11 
 
 
                 
 
  Quarter ended Sept. 30, Nine months ended Sept. 30,
(in millions) 2010  2009  2010  2009 
  
Gains (after tax) recognized in OCI on derivatives (effective portion) $241   196   590   68 
Gains (pre tax) reclassified from cumulative OCI into net interest income (effective portion)  266   129   594   408 
Gains (losses) (pre tax) recognized in noninterest income on derivatives (ineffective portion) (1)  (4)  27   2   38 
  
  
(1) None of the change in value of the derivatives was excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness.
Free-Standing Derivatives
We use free-standing derivatives (economic hedges), in addition to debt securities available for sale, to hedge the risk of changes in the fair value of residential MSRs, new prime residential MHFS, derivative loan commitments and other interests held, with the resulting gain or loss reflected in other income.
The derivatives used to hedge residential MSRs, which include swaps, swaptions, forwards, Eurodollar and Treasury futures and options contracts, resulted in net derivative gains of $3.3$1.2 billion and net derivative gains of $5.1$6.2 billion, respectively, in the secondthird quarter and first halfnine months of 2010 and net derivative lossesgains of $1.3$3.6 billion and net derivative gains of $2.4$6.0 billion, respectively, in the same periods of 2009 from economic hedges related to our mortgage servicing activities and are included in mortgage banking noninterest income. The aggregate fair value of these derivatives used as economic hedges was a net asset of $2.0$1.1 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, and a net liability of $961 million at December 31, 2009. Changes in fair value of debt securities available for sale (unrealized gains and losses) are not included in servicing income, but are reported in cumulative OCI (net of tax) or, upon sale, are reported in net gains (losses) on debt securities available for sale.

103105


Interest rate lock commitments for residential mortgage loans that we intend to sell are considered free-standing derivatives. Our interest rate exposure on these derivative loan commitments, as well as most new prime residential MHFS, for which we have elected the fair value option, is hedged with free-standing derivatives (economic hedges) such as forwards and options, Eurodollar futures and options, and Treasury futures, forwards and options contracts. The commitments, free-standing derivatives and residential MHFS are carried at fair value with changes in fair value included in mortgage banking noninterest income. For interest rate lock commitments we include, at inception and during the life of the loan commitment, the expected net future cash flows related to the associated servicing of the loan as part of the fair value measurement of derivative loan commitments. Changes subsequent to inception are based on changes in fair value of the underlying loan resulting from the exercise of the commitment and changes in the probability that the loan will not fund within the terms of the commitment (referred to as a fall-out factor). The value of the underlying loan is affected primarily by changes in interest rates and the passage of time. However, changes in investor demand, such as concerns about credit risk, can also cause changes in the spread relationships between underlying loan value and the derivative financial instruments that cannot be hedged. The aggregate fair value of derivative loan commitments in the balance sheet was a net asset of $403$223 million at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, and a net liability of $312 million at December 31, 2009, and is included in the caption “Interest rate contracts” under “Customer accommodation, trading and other free-standing derivatives” in the first table in this Note.
We also enter into various derivatives primarily to provide derivative products to customers. To a lesser extent, we take positions based on market expectations or to benefit from price differentials between financial instruments and markets. These derivatives are not linked to specific assets and liabilities in the balance sheet or to forecasted transactions in an accounting hedge relationship and, therefore, do not qualify for hedge accounting. We also enter into free-standing derivatives for risk management that do not otherwise qualify for hedge accounting. They are carried at fair value with changes in fair value recorded as part of other noninterest income.
Additionally, free-standing derivatives include embedded derivatives that are required to be accounted for separate from their host contract. We periodically issue hybrid long-term notes and CDs where the performance of the hybrid instrument notes is linked to an equity, commodity or currency index, or basket of such indices. These notes contain explicit terms that affect some or all of the cash flows or the value of the note in a manner similar to a derivative instrument and therefore are considered to contain an “embedded” derivative instrument. The indices on which the performance of the hybrid instrument is calculated are not clearly and closely related to the host debt instrument. In accordance with accounting guidance for derivatives, the “embedded” derivative is separated from the host contract and accounted for as a free-standing derivative.

104106


The following table shows the net gains (losses) recognized in the income statement related to derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under the Derivatives and Hedging topic of the Codification.
                                
 
 Quarter ended June 30 Six months ended June 30 Quarter ended Sept. 30, Nine months ended Sept. 30,
(in millions) 2010 2009 2010 2009  2010 2009 2010 2009 
   
Gains (losses) recognized on free-standing derivatives (economic hedges):
  
Interest rate contracts (1)  
Recognized in noninterest income:  
Mortgage banking $757 692 1,425 3,056  $(267) 1,780 1,158 4,836 
Other  (30) 4  (36)  (1)  (46) 2  (82) 1 
Foreign exchange contracts 69  (98) 145  (18)  (82) 24 63 6 
Equity contracts    2     2 
Credit contracts  (36)  (56)  (125)  (114)  (24)  (98)  (149)  (212)
   
Subtotal 760 542 1,409 2,925   (419) 1,708 990 4,633 
   
Gains (losses) recognized on customer accommodation, trading and other free-standing derivatives:
  
Interest rate contracts (2)  
Recognized in noninterest income:  
Mortgage banking 1,644  (616) 2,547 397  1,512 1,274 4,059 1,671 
Other  (154) 499 165 812   (322) 27  (157) 839 
Commodity contracts 13  (27) 33  (39) 56 14 89  (25)
Equity contracts 495  (58) 449  (181)  (141)  (48) 308  (229)
Foreign exchange contracts 148 145 266 258  98 224 364 482 
Credit contracts  (58)  (352)  (488)  (98)  (20)  (459)  (508)  (557)
Other  (12)  (13)  (19)  (176) 18  (10)  (1)  (186)
   
Subtotal 2,076  (422) 2,953 973  1,201 1,022 4,154 1,995 
   
Net gains recognized related to derivatives not designated as hedging instruments $2,836 120 4,362 3,898  $782 2,730 5,144 6,628 
   
   
(1) Predominantly mortgage banking noninterest income including gains (losses) on the derivatives used as economic hedges of MSRs, interest rate lock commitments, loans held for sale and mortgages held for sale.
(2) Predominantly mortgage banking noninterest income including gains (losses) on interest rate lock commitments.
Credit Derivatives
We use credit derivatives to manage exposure to credit risk related to lending and investing activity and to assist customers with their risk management objectives. This may include protection sold to offset purchased protection in structured product transactions, as well as liquidity agreements written to special purpose vehicles. The maximum exposure of sold credit derivatives is managed through posted collateral, purchased credit derivatives and similar products in order to achieve our desired credit risk profile. This credit risk management provides an ability to recover a significant portion of any amounts that would be paid under the sold credit derivatives. We would be required to perform under the noted credit derivatives in the event of default by the referenced obligors. Events of default include events such as bankruptcy, capital restructuring or lack of principal and/or interest payment. In certain cases, other triggers may exist, such as the credit downgrade of the referenced obligors or the inability of the special purpose vehicle for which we have provided liquidity to obtain funding.

105107


The following table provides details of sold and purchased credit derivatives.
                                                        
 
 Notional amount    Notional amount   
 Protection Protection        Protection Protection       
 sold— purchased Net      sold— purchased Net     
 non- with protection Other    non- with protection Other   
 Fair value Protection investment identical sold protection Range of  Fair value Protection investment identical sold protection Range of 
(in millions) liability sold (A) grade underlyings (B) (A) - (B) purchased maturities  liability sold (A) grade underlyings (B) (A) - (B) purchased maturities 
 
 
June 30, 2010
 

September 30, 2010

 
Credit default swaps on:
  
Corporate bonds
 $1,759 40,279 20,552 32,465 7,814 8,414 2010-2020  $1,232 31,622 15,959 23,805 7,817 7,394 2010-2020 
Structured products
 4,556 6,238 5,478 4,932 1,306 3,012 2016-2056  4,355 5,964 5,230 4,998 966 2,644 2016-2056 
Credit protection on:
  
Default swap index
 39 2,655 1,234 2,655  486 2010-2017  14 2,902 1,134 2,508 394 1,037 2010-2017 
Commercial mortgage- backed securities index
 1,190 2,789 749 2,348 441 128 2049-2052 
Commercial mortgage-backed securities index
 926 2,571 674 1,972 599 350 2049-2052 
Asset-backed securities index
 275 361 296 315 46 95 2037-2046  204 252 252 156 96 143 2037-2046 
Loan deliverable credit default swaps
 7 489 479 396 93 253 2010-2014  5 489 476 396 93 251 2010-2014 
Other
 12 6,932 6,389 39 6,893 4,967 2010-2056  12 7,172 6,540 37 7,135 3,269 2010-2056 
   
Total credit derivatives
 $7,838 59,743 35,177 43,150 16,593 17,355  $6,748 50,972 30,265 33,872 17,100 15,088 
 
December 31, 2009  
Credit default swaps on:  
Corporate bonds $2,419 55,511 23,815 44,159 11,352 12,634 2010-2018  $2,419 55,511 23,815 44,159 11,352 12,634 2010-2018 
Structured products 4,498 6,627 5,084 4,999 1,628 3,018 2014-2056  4,498 6,627 5,084 4,999 1,628 3,018 2014-2056 
Credit protection on:  
Default swap index 23 6,611 2,765 4,202 2,409 2,510 2010-2017  23 6,611 2,765 4,202 2,409 2,510 2010-2017 
Commercial mortgage- backed securities index 1,987 5,188 453 4,749 439 189 2049-2052 
Commercial mortgage-backed securities index 1,987 5,188 453 4,749 439 189 2049-2052 
Asset-backed securities index 637 830 660 696 134 189 2037-2046  637 830 660 696 134 189 2037-2046 
Loan deliverable credit default swaps 12 510 494 423 87 287 2010-2014  12 510 494 423 87 287 2010-2014 
Other 1 1,416 809 32 1,384 100 2010-2020  1 1,416 809 32 1,384 100 2010-2020 
   
Total credit derivatives $9,577 76,693 34,080 59,260 17,433 18,927  $9,577 76,693 34,080 59,260 17,433 18,927 
 
Protection sold represents the estimated maximum exposure to loss that would be incurred under an assumed hypothetical circumstance, despite what we believe is its extremely remote possibility, where the value of our interests and any associated collateral declines to zero, without any consideration of recovery or offset from any economic hedges. Accordingly, this required disclosure is not an indication of expected loss. The amounts under non-investment grade represent the notional amounts of those credit derivatives on which we have a higher performance risk, or higher risk of being required to perform under the terms of the credit derivative and is a function of the underlying assets. We consider the risk of performance to be high if the underlying assets under the credit derivative have an external rating that is below investment grade or an internal credit default grade that is equivalent thereto. We believe the net protection sold, which is representative of the net notional amount of protection sold and purchased with identical underlyings, in combination with other protection purchased, is more representative of our exposure to loss than either non-investment grade or protection sold. Other protection purchased represents additional protection, which may offset the exposure to loss for protection sold, that was not purchased with an identical underlying of the protection sold.

106108


Credit-Risk Contingent Features
Certain of our derivative contracts contain provisions whereby if the credit rating of our debt, based on certain major credit rating agencies indicated in the relevant contracts, were to fall below investment grade, the counterparty could demand additional collateral or require termination or replacement of derivative instruments in a net liability position. The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with such credit-risk-related contingent features that are in a net liability position was $10.5$14.4 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, and $7.5 billion at December 31, 2009, for which we had posted $9.9$13.7 billion and $7.1 billion, respectively, in collateral in the normal course of business. If the credit-risk-related contingent features underlying these agreements had been triggered on JuneSeptember 30, 2010, or December 31, 2009, we would have been required to post additional collateral of $618$694 million or $1.0 billion, respectively, or potentially settle the contract in an amount equal to its fair value.
Counterparty Credit Risk
By using derivatives, we are exposed to counterparty credit risk if counterparties to the derivative contracts do not perform as expected. If a counterparty fails to perform, our counterparty credit risk is equal to the amount reported as a derivative asset on our balance sheet. The amounts reported as a derivative asset are derivative contracts in a gain position, and to the extent subject to master netting arrangements, net of derivatives in a loss position with the same counterparty and cash collateral received. We minimize counterparty credit risk through credit approvals, limits, monitoring procedures, executing master netting arrangements and obtaining collateral, where appropriate. To the extent the master netting arrangements and other criteria meet the requirements outlined in the Derivatives and Hedging topic of the Codification, derivatives balances and related cash collateral amounts are shown net in the balance sheet. Counterparty credit risk related to derivatives is considered in determining fair value and our assessment of hedge effectiveness.

107109


12.12. FAIR VALUES OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
We use fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. Trading assets, securities available for sale, derivatives, certain loans, prime residential MHFS, certain commercial LHFS, residential MSRs, principal investments, certain long-term debt, and securities sold but not yet purchased (short sale liabilities) are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Certain loans and long-term debt are carried at fair value on a recurring basis beginning on January 1, 2010. Additionally, from time to time, we may be required to record at fair value other assets on a nonrecurring basis, such as nonprime residential and commercial MHFS, certain LHFS, loans held for investment and certain other assets. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically involve application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.
Under fair value option accounting guidance, we elected to measure MHFS at fair value prospectively for new prime residential MHFS originations, for which an active secondary market and readily available market prices existed to reliably support fair value pricing models used for these loans. We also elected to remeasure at fair value certain of our other interests held related to residential loan sales and securitizations. We believe the election for MHFS and other interests held (which are now hedged with free-standing derivatives (economic hedges) along with our MSRs) reduces certain timing differences and better matches changes in the value of these assets with changes in the value of derivatives used as economic hedges for these assets.
Upon the acquisition of Wachovia, we elected to measure at fair value certain portfolios of LHFS that we intend to hold for trading purposes and that may be economically hedged with derivative instruments. In addition, we elected to measure at fair value certain letters of credit that are hedged with derivative instruments to better reflect the economics of the transactions. These letters of credit are included in trading account assets or liabilities.
Upon adoption of new consolidation accounting guidance on January 1, 2010, we elected to measure certain loans and long-term debt of consolidated VIEs under the fair value option. We elected the fair value option to effectively continue fair value accounting through earnings for our interests in these VIEs. See Notes 1 and 7 in this Report for additional information.
Fair Value Hierarchy
In accordance with the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures topic of the Codification, we group our assets and liabilities measured at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are:
Level 1 — Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.
Level 2 — Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.
Level 1 — Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.
Level 2 — Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.
Level 3 — Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include use of option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques.
In the determination of the classification of financial instruments in Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, we consider all available information, including observable market data, indications of market liquidity and orderliness, and our understanding of the valuation techniques and significant inputs used. For securities in inactive markets, we use a predetermined percentage to evaluate the impact of fair value

108


adjustments derived from weighting both external and internal indications of value to determine if the instrument is classified as Level 2 or Level 3. Based upon the specific facts and circumstances of each

110


instrument or instrument category, judgments are made regarding the significance of the Level 3 inputs to the instruments’ fair value measurement in its entirety. If Level 3 inputs are considered significant, the instrument is classified as Level 3.
Determination of Fair Value
In accordance with the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures topic of the Codification, we base our fair values on the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. It is our policy to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when developing fair value measurements, as prescribed in the fair value hierarchy.
In instances where there is limited or no observable market data, fair value measurements for assets and liabilities are based primarily upon our own estimates or combination of our own estimates and independent vendor or broker pricing, and the measurements are often calculated based on current pricing policy, the economic and competitive environment, the characteristics of the asset or liability and other such factors. Therefore, the results cannot be determined with precision and may not be realized in an actual sale or immediate settlement of the asset or liability. Additionally, there may be inherent weaknesses in any calculation technique, and changes in the underlying assumptions used, including discount rates and estimates of future cash flows, that could significantly affect the results of current or future values.
We incorporate lack of liquidity into our fair value measurement based on the type of asset measured and the valuation methodology used. For example, for residential MHFS and certain securities where the significant inputs have become unobservable due to the illiquid markets and vendor or broker pricing is not used, we use a discounted cash flow technique to measure fair value. This technique incorporates forecasting of expected cash flows (adjusted for credit loss assumptions and estimated prepayment speeds) discounted at an appropriate market discount rate to reflect the lack of liquidity in the market that a market participant would consider. For other securities where vendor or broker pricing is used, we use either unadjusted broker quotes or vendor prices or vendor or broker prices adjusted by weighting them with internal discounted cash flow techniques to measure fair value. These unadjusted vendor or broker prices inherently reflect any lack of liquidity in the market as the fair value measurement represents an exit price from a market participant viewpoint.
Fair Value Measurements from Independent Brokers or Independent Third Party Pricing Services
For certain assets and liabilities, we obtain fair value measurements from independent brokers or independent third party pricing services and record the unadjusted fair value in our financial statements. The detail by level is shown in the table below. Fair value measurements obtained from independent brokers or independent third party pricing services that we have adjusted to determine the fair value recorded in our financial statements are not included in the following table.

109111


                                                
 
 Independent brokers Third party pricing services  Independent brokers Third party pricing services 
(in millions) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 
   
 
June 30, 2010
 

September 30, 2010

 
Trading assets (excluding derivatives)
 $ 1,909  17 1,985   $ 1,581 5 19 1,308  
Securities available for sale:
  
Securities of U.S. treasury and federal agencies
    808 875      980 763  
Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions
  14   13,658    15   14,377  
Mortgage-backed securities
  3 37  84,916 57   3 32  106,056 75 
Other debt securities
  194 3,249  11,910 142   151 3,762  14,852 730 
   
Total debt securities
  211 3,286 808 111,359 199   169 3,794 980 136,048 805 
   
Total marketable equity securities
 173 21  1,045 728   230   419 773  
   
Total securities available for sale
 173 232 3,286 1,853 112,087 199  230 169 3,794 1,399 136,821 805 
   
Derivatives (trading and other assets)
  18 44  1,423 10   11   1,015 9 
Loans held for sale
     1       1  
Derivatives (liabilities)
  13 54  1,552 1      1,120  
Other liabilities
  10   348    10   312  
   
December 31, 2009  
Trading assets (excluding derivatives) $ 4,208  30 1,712 81  $ 4,208  30 1,712 81 
Securities available for sale 85 1,870 548 1,467 120,688 1,864  85 1,870 548 1,467 120,688 1,864 
Loans held for sale     2       2  
Derivatives (trading and other assets)  8 42  2,926 9   8 42  2,926 9 
Derivatives (liabilities)   70  2,949 4    70  2,949 4 
Other liabilities    10 3,916 26     10 3,916 26 
   
For complete descriptions of the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities recorded at fair value and for estimating fair value for financial instruments not recorded at fair value, see Note 16 of thein our 2009 Form 10-K. There have been no material changes to our valuation methodologies in secondthird quarter 2010.

110112


Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The table below presents the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at JuneSeptember 30, 2010.
                                        
 
(in millions) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Netting (1)  Total  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Netting Total 
   
June 30, 2010
 
September 30, 2010
 
Trading assets (excluding derivatives)
  
Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies
 $2,221 3,551   5,772  $2,587 3,939   6,526 
Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions
  1,338 12  1,350   1,622 6  1,628 
Collateralized debt obligations
  32 1,767  1,799    1,845  1,845 
Corporate debt securities
  8,896 165  9,061  1 10,092 181  10,274 
Equity securities
 1,430 677 52  2,159  1,597 738 29  2,364 
Other trading securities
  5,228 330  5,558   7,220 819  8,039 
   
Total trading securities
 3,651 19,722 2,326  25,699  4,185 23,611 2,880  30,676 
   
Other trading assets
 728 108 149  985  736 128 134  998 
   
Total trading assets (excluding derivatives)
 4,379 19,830 2,475  26,684  4,921 23,739 3,014  31,674 
   
Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies
 808 877   1,685  980 763   1,743 
Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions
  13,688 2,736  16,424   14,408 3,759  18,167 
Mortgage-backed securities:
  
Federal agencies
  71,395   71,395   83,595   83,595 
Residential
  20,793 353  21,146   20,563 223  20,786 
Commercial
  11,633 897  12,530   12,775 219  12,994 
   
Total mortgage-backed securities
  103,821 1,250  105,071   116,933 442  117,375 
   
Corporate debt securities
  9,563 380  9,943   9,931 479  10,410 
Collateralized debt obligations
   4,031  4,031    4,526  4,526 
Asset-backed securities:
  
Auto loans and leases
  293 7,104  7,397   358 8,254  8,612 
Home equity loans
  941 194  1,135   796 235  1,031 
Other asset-backed securities
  3,050 3,341  6,391   5,856 3,429  9,285 
   
Total asset-backed securities
  4,284 10,639  14,923   7,010 11,918  18,928 
   
Other debt securities
  599 88  687   357 93  450 
   
Total debt securities
 808 132,832 19,124  152,764  980 149,402 21,217  171,599 
   
Marketable equity securities:
  
Perpetual preferred securities(2)(1)
 666 791 2,629  4,086  708 694 2,534  3,936 
Other marketable equity securities
 957 104 16  1,077  1,188 133 19  1,340 
   
Total marketable equity securities
 1,623 895 2,645  5,163  1,896 827 2,553  5,276 
   
Total securities available for sale
 2,431 133,727 21,769  157,927  2,876 150,229 23,770  176,875 
   
Mortgages held for sale
  31,617 3,260  34,877   39,522 3,269  42,791 
Loans held for sale
  238   238   436   436 
Loans
   367  367    353  353 
Mortgage servicing rights (residential)
   13,251  13,251    12,486  12,486 
Derivative assets:
  
Interest rate contracts
 1,490 78,745 1,108  81,343  354 90,187 1,182  91,723 
Commodity contracts
  3,669   3,669   4,142   4,142 
Equity contracts
 252 1,996 658  2,906  444 1,957 720  3,121 
Foreign exchange contracts
 110 4,523 5  4,638  46 5,320 34  5,400 
Credit contracts
  3,498 3,923  7,421   2,849 3,442  6,291 
Other derivative contracts
  8 1  9  12  1  13 
   
Netting
     (74,396)  (74,396)     (87,944)(2)  (87,944)
   
Total derivative assets(3)
 1,852 92,439 5,695  (74,396) 25,590  856 104,455 5,379  (87,944) 22,746 
   
Other assets
 432 690 360  1,482  146 791 345  1,282 
   
Total assets recorded at fair value
 $9,094 278,541 47,177  (74,396) 260,416  $8,799 319,172 48,616  (87,944) 288,643 
   
Derivative liabilities:
  
Interest rate contracts
 $(1,717)  (72,136)  (465)   (74,318) $(798)  (83,403)  (531)   (84,732)
Commodity contracts
   (3,563)    (3,563)   (4,137)  (1)   (4,138)
Equity contracts
  (174)  (1,827)  (890)   (2,891)  (187)  (2,161)  (845)   (3,193)
Foreign exchange contracts
  (109)  (4,560)  (7)   (4,676)  (44)  (3,623)  (37)   (3,704)
Credit contracts
   (3,452)  (4,916)   (8,368)   (2,832)  (4,458)   (7,290)
Other derivative contracts
   (22)  (104)   (126)    (103)   (103)
   
Netting
    82,310 82,310      95,368(2) 95,368 
   
Total derivative liabilities(4)
  (2,000)  (85,560)  (6,382) 82,310  (11,632)  (1,029)  (96,156)  (5,975) 95,368  (7,792)
   
Short sale liabilities
  
Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies
  (1,957)  (784)    (2,741)  (2,436)  (1,126)    (3,562)
Corporate debt securities
   (3,477)  (1)   (3,478)   (3,177)    (3,177)
Equity securities
  (1,888)  (116)    (2,004)  (2,233)  (223)    (2,456)
Other securities
   (82)  (3)   (85)   (108)    (108)
   
Total short sale liabilities
  (3,845)  (4,459)  (4)   (8,308)  (4,669)  (4,634)    (9,303)
   
Other liabilities
   (39)  (1,806)   (1,845)   (43)  (1,770)   (1,813)
   
Total liabilities recorded at fair value
 $(5,845)  (90,058)  (8,192) 82,310  (21,785) $(5,698)  (100,833)  (7,745) 95,368  (18,908)
   
   
(1)Perpetual preferred securities are primarily ARS. See Note 7 for additional information.
(2) Derivatives are reported net of cash collateral received and paid and, to the extent that the criteria of the accounting guidance covering the offsetting of amounts related to certain contracts are met, positions with the same counterparty are netted as part of a legally enforceable master netting agreement.
(2)Perpetual preferred securities are primarily ARS. See Note 7 for additional information.
(3) Derivative assets include contracts qualifying for hedge accounting, economic hedges, and derivatives included in trading assets.
(4) Derivative liabilities include contracts qualifying for hedge accounting, economic hedges, and derivatives included in trading liabilities.

111113


The table below presents the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2009.
                                        
 
(in millions) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Netting (1)  Total  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Netting Total 
   
December 31, 2009  
Trading assets (excluding derivatives) (2)(1) $2,386 20,497 2,311  25,194  $2,386 20,497 2,311  25,194 
Derivatives (trading assets) 340 70,938 5,682  (59,115) 17,845  340 70,938 5,682  (59,115)(2) 17,845 
Securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies 1,094 1,186   2,280  1,094 1,186   2,280 
Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions 4 12,708 818  13,530  4 12,708 818  13,530 
Mortgage-backed securities:  
Federal agencies  82,818   82,818   82,818   82,818 
Residential  27,506 1,084  28,590   27,506 1,084  28,590 
Commercial  9,162 1,799  10,961   9,162 1,799  10,961 
   
Total mortgage-backed securities  119,486 2,883  122,369   119,486 2,883  122,369 
   
Corporate debt securities  8,968 367  9,335   8,968 367  9,335 
Collateralized debt obligations   3,725  3,725    3,725  3,725 
Other  3,292 12,587  15,879   3,292 12,587  15,879 
   
Total debt securities 1,098 145,640 20,380  167,118  1,098 145,640 20,380  167,118 
   
Marketable equity securities:  
Perpetual preferred securities 736 834 2,305  3,875  736 834 2,305  3,875 
Other marketable equity securities 1,279 350 88  1,717  1,279 350 88  1,717 
   
Total marketable equity securities 2,015 1,184 2,393  5,592  2,015 1,184 2,393  5,592 
   
Total securities available for sale 3,113 146,824 22,773  172,710  3,113 146,824 22,773  172,710 
   
Mortgages held for sale  33,439 3,523  36,962   33,439 3,523  36,962 
Loans held for sale  149   149   149   149 
Mortgage servicing rights (residential)   16,004  16,004    16,004  16,004 
Other assets (3) 1,932 11,720 1,690  (6,812) 8,530  1,932 11,720 1,690  (6,812)(2) 8,530 
   
Total assets recorded at fair value $7,771 283,567 51,983  (65,927) 277,394  $7,771 283,567 51,983  (65,927) 277,394 
   
Other liabilities (4) $(6,527)  (81,613)  (7,942) 73,299  (22,783) $(6,527)  (81,613)  (7,942)  73,299(2)  (22,783)
   
(1)Includes trading securities of $24.0 billion.
(2) Derivatives are reported net of cash collateral received and paid and, to the extent that the criteria of the accounting guidance covering the offsetting of amounts related to certain contracts are met, positions with the same counterparty are netted as part of a legally enforceable master netting agreement.
(2)Includes trading securities of $24.0 billion.
(3) Derivative assets other than trading and principal investments are included in this category.
(4) Derivative liabilities are included in this category.

112114


The changes in secondthird quarter 2010 for Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized as follows:
                                                                
 
 Net unrealized  Net unrealized 
 Total net gains Purchases, gains (losses)  Total net gains Purchases, gains (losses) 
 (losses) included in sales, included in net  (losses) included in sales, included in net 
 Other issuances income related  Other issuances income related 
 Balance, compre- and Transfers Transfers Balance, to assets and  Balance, compre- and Transfers Transfers Balance, to assets and 
 beginning Net hensive settlements, into out of end liabilities held  beginning Net hensive settlements, into out of end liabilities held 
(in millions) of period income income net Level 3 (1) Level 3 (1) of period at period end (2) of period income income net Level 3 Level 3 of period at period end (1) 
 
Quarter ended June 30, 2010
 
Quarter ended September 30, 2010
 
Trading assets (excluding derivatives):
  
Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions
 $12 5   (5)   12 6  $12  (4)   (2)   6 1 
Collateralized debt obligations
 1,889 31   (153)   1,767 2  1,767 21  57   1,845  (12)
Corporate bonds
 276 6  22   (139) 165 22  165 8  8   181 2 
Equity securities
 67 1   (16)   52   52  (1)   (22)   29  (1)
Other trading securities
 390 20   (80)   330 4  330 54  435   819 50 
 
Total trading securities
 2,634 63   (232)   (139) 2,326 34  2,326 78  476   2,880 40 
 
Other trading assets
 174  (21)   (4)   149 6  149  (18)  3   134 2 
 
Total trading assets (excluding derivatives)
 2,808 42   (236)   (139) 2,475  40(3) 2,475 60  479   3,014  42(2)
 
Securities available for sale:
  
Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions
 2,871 3 32  (170)   2,736 4  2,736 5 45 899 74  3,759  
Mortgage-backed securities:
  
Residential
 406   (22) 26 82  (139) 353   353 14  (3)  (30) 8  (119) 223  (1)
Commercial
 503  (17) 368  (8) 128  (77) 897   897  (2) 21  (13) 40  (724) 219  (1)
 
Total mortgage-backed securities
 909  (17) 346 18 210  (216) 1,250   1,250 12 18  (43) 48  (843) 442  (2)
 
Corporate debt securities
 503 3  (2)  (44) 28  (108) 380   380 3 28  (22) 93  (3) 479  
Collateralized debt obligations
 3,851 40  (114) 254   4,031  (5) 4,031 64 41 390   4,526  (1)
Asset-backed securities:
  
Auto loans and leases
 7,587   (56)  (428) 1  7,104   7,104 2  (51) 1,199   8,254  
Home equity loans
 107 1 5  (1) 98  (16) 194  (2) 194  24 49   (32) 235  
Other asset-backed securities
 2,190  (6)  (39) 1,540   (344) 3,341  (1) 3,341  (5)  (19) 22 115  (25) 3,429  (5)
 
Total asset-backed securities
 9,884  (5)  (90) 1,111 99  (360) 10,639  (3) 10,639  (3)  (46) 1,270 115  (57) 11,918  (5)
 
Other debt securities
 79  2 7   88   88  (5) 10    93  
 
Total debt securities
 18,097 24 174 1,176 337  (684) 19,124  (4) 19,124 76 96 2,494 330  (903) 21,217  (8)
 
Marketable equity securities:
  
Perpetual preferred securities
 2,967 58  (14)  (381)   (1) 2,629   2,629 20  (7)  (172) 77  (13) 2,534  
Other marketable equity securities
 12   15   (11) 16   16   1 4  (2) 19  
 
Total marketable equity securities
 2,979 58  (14)  (366)   (12) 2,645   2,645 20  (7)  (171) 81  (15) 2,553  
 
Total securities available for sale
 21,076 82 160 810 337  (696) 21,769  (4) 21,769 96 89 2,323 411  (918) 23,770  (8)
 
Mortgages held for sale
 3,338  (17)   (89) 104  (76) 3,260  (16)(4) 3,260  (2)  2 91  (82) 3,269  (3)(3)
Loans
 371 8   (12)   367  7(4) 367 16   (30)   353  16(3)
Mortgage servicing rights (residential)
 15,544  (3,237)  944   13,251  (2,661)(4) 13,251  (1,807)  1,042   12,486  (1,132)(3)
Net derivative assets and liabilities:
  
Interest rate contracts
 257 1,685   (1,299)   643 407  643 1,610   (1,761) 159  651 244 
Equity contracts
  (281)  (87)  122 30  (16)  (232)    (232) 40  7 34 25  (126)  (1)
Foreign exchange contracts
 4  (8)  2    (2)    (2)  (7)  9   (3)  (3)  (11)
Credit contracts
  (758)  (202)   (33)    (993)  (178)  (993) 4   (27)    (1,016)  
Other derivative contracts
  (30)  (78)  5    (103)    (103) 13   (12)    (102)  (16)
 
Total derivative contracts
  (808) 1,310   (1,203) 30  (16)  (687)  229(5)  (687) 1,660   (1,784) 193 22  (596)  216(4)
 
Other assets
 377 2   (19)   360  (6)(4) 360 3   (18)   345  (8)(3)
Short sale liabilities (corporate debt securities)
  (65) 1   (5)  65  (4)    (4)  (1)  5     (1)
Other liabilities (excluding derivatives)
  (1,672)  (368)  234    (1,806)  (368)  (1,806)  (357)  393    (1,770)  (354)
 
(1)The amounts presented as transfers into and out of Level 3 represent fair value as of the beginning of the quarter in which each transfer occurred.
(2) Represents only net gains (losses) that are due to changes in economic conditions and management’s estimates of fair value and excludes changes due to the collection/realization of cash flows over time.
(3)(2) Included in other noninterest income in the income statement.
(4)(3) Included in mortgage banking in the income statement.
(5)(4) Included in mortgage banking, trading activities and other noninterest income in the income statement.

113115


The changes in secondthird quarter 2009 for Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized as follows:
                                                        
 
 Net unrealized  Net unrealized 
 Total net gains Purchases, gains (losses)  Total net gains Purchases, gains (losses) 
 (losses) included in sales, Net included in net  (losses) included in sales, Net included in net 
 Other issuances transfers income related  Other issuances transfers income related 
 Balance, compre- and into and/or Balance, to assets and  Balance, compre- and into and/or Balance, to assets and 
 beginning Net hensive settlements, out of end liabilities held  beginning Net hensive settlements, out of end liabilities held 
(in millions) of period income income net Level 3 (1) of period at period end (2) of period income income net Level 3 of period at period end (1) 
 
Quarter ended June 30, 2009 
Quarter ended September 30, 2009 
Trading assets (excluding derivatives) $3,258 80   (875) 12 2,475  99(3) $2,475 149   (138) 7 2,493  100(2)
Securities available for sale:  
Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions 821 20 11 53  905 5  905 2 32 1 22 962 3 
Mortgage-backed securities:  
Federal agencies        
Residential 7,657  (1) 173  (418)  (1,498) 5,913  (56) 5,913  (25) 216  (135)  (3,563) 2,406  (51)
Commercial 2,497  (110) 246  (2)  (16) 2,615  (1) 2,615  (1) 181  (28)  (907) 1,860  (44)
 
Total mortgage-backed securities 10,154  (111) 419  (420)  (1,514) 8,528  (57) 8,528  (26) 397  (163)  (4,470) 4,266  (95)
 
Corporate debt securities 261 4 46  (6)  (19) 286   286   (12) 18  (47) 245  
Collateralized debt obligations 2,329  (15) 17 102 315 2,748  (46) 2,748 17 369 129  3,263  (16)
Other 15,267 49 427 186  (211) 15,718  (21) 15,718 44 238  (428)  (2,402) 13,170  (33)
 
Total debt securities 28,832  (53) 920  (85)  (1,429) 28,185  (119) 28,185 37 1,024  (443)  (6,897) 21,906  (141)
 
Marketable equity securities:  
Perpetual preferred securities 2,557 16 89 77  (23) 2,716  (1) 2,716 10 54  (322) 31 2,489  
Other marketable equity securities 44  17 2 64 127   127   (3)  (32)  (79) 13  
 
Total marketable equity securities 2,601 16 106 79 41 2,843  (1) 2,843 10 51  (354)  (48) 2,502  
 
Total securities available for sale 31,433  (37) 1,026  (6)  (1,388) 31,028  (120) 31,028 47 1,075  (797)  (6,945) 24,408  (141)
 
Mortgages held for sale 4,516  (4)   (361)  (52) 4,099  (8)(4) 4,099  (64)   (191) 30 3,874  (67)(3)
Mortgage servicing rights (residential) 12,391 1,217  2,082  15,690  2,316(4) 15,690  (2,707)  1,517  14,500  (2,078)(3)
Net derivative assets and liabilities 1,036  (854)   (413) 25  (206)  (483)(5)  (206) 1,085  (1)  (952)  (288)  (362)  274(4)
Other assets (excluding derivatives) 1,221  (24)  29  1,226  (14)(4) 1,226  (9)  7  1,224  (13)(3)
Other liabilities (excluding derivatives)  (729)  (102)   (19)  (2)  (852)  (102)  (852)  (137)   (40)  (8)  (1,037)  (144)
 
(1)The amounts presented as transfers into and out of Level 3 represent fair value as of the beginning of the quarter in which each transfer occurred.
(2) Represents only net gains (losses) that are due to changes in economic conditions and management’s estimates of fair value and excludes changes due to the collection/realization of cash flows over time.
(3)(2) Included in other noninterest income in the income statement.
(4)(3) Included in mortgage banking in the income statement.
(5)(4) Included in mortgage banking, trading activities and other noninterest income in the income statement.

114116


The changes in the first halfnine months of 2010 for Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized as follows:
                                                                
 
 Net unrealized  Net unrealized 
 Total net gains Purchases, gains (losses)  Total net gains Purchases, gains (losses) 
 (losses) included in sales, included in net  (losses) included in sales, included in net 
 Other issuances income related  Other issuances income related 
 Balance, compre- and Transfers Transfers Balance,  to assets and  Balance, compre- and Transfers Transfers Balance, to assets and 
 beginning Net hensive settlements, into out of end liabilities held  beginning Net hensive settlements, into out of end liabilities held 
(in millions) of period income income net Level 3 (1) Level 3 (1) of period at period end (2) of period income income net Level 3 Level 3 of period at period end (1) 
 

Six months ended June 30, 2010
 
Nine months ended September 30, 2010
 
Trading assets (excluding derivatives):
  
Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions
 $5 7   (9) 9  12 7  $5 3   (11) 9  6 3 
Collateralized debt obligations
 1,133 382  252   1,767 16  1,133 403  309   1,845 7 
Corporate bonds
 223 13  62 9  (142) 165 23  223 21  70 9  (142) 181 24 
Equity securities
 36 2  12 2  52   36 1   (10) 2  29  (1)
Other trading securities
 643 34   (154) 1  (194) 330 12  643 88  281 1  (194) 819 63 
 
Total trading securities
 2,040 438  163 21  (336) 2,326 58  2,040 516  639 21  (336) 2,880 96 
 
Other trading assets
 271  (36)   (4)   (82) 149  (11) 271  (54)   (2)   (81) 134  (13)
 
Total trading assets (excluding derivatives)
 2,311 402  159 21  (418) 2,475  47(3) 2,311 462  637 21  (417) 3,014  83(2)
 
Securities available for sale:
  
Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions
 818 4 94 1,798 28  (6) 2,736 4  818 9 139 2,697 102  (6) 3,759 3 
Mortgage-backed securities:
  
Residential
 1,084  (7)  (15)  (14) 266  (961) 353  (4) 1,084 7  (18)  (44) 274  (1,080) 223  (7)
Commercial
 1,799  (17) 373  (7) 187  (1,438) 897  (4) 1,799  (19) 394  (20) 227  (2,162) 219  (5)
 
Total mortgage-backed securities
 2,883  (24) 358  (21) 453  (2,399) 1,250  (8) 2,883  (12) 376  (64) 501  (3,242) 442  (12)
 
Corporate debt securities
 367 4 42  (50) 166  (149) 380   367 7 70  (72) 259  (152) 479  
Collateralized debt obligations
 3,725 79  (38) 477   (212) 4,031  (10) 3,725 143 3 867   (212) 4,526  (11)
Asset-backed securities:
  
Auto loans and leases
 8,525   (123)  (1,477) 179  7,104   8,525 2  (174)  (278) 179  8,254  (5)
Home equity loans
 1,677  12  (2) 113  (1,606) 194  (5) 1,677  36 47 113  (1,638) 235  
Other asset-backed securities
 2,308 48  (82) 1,403 679  (1,015) 3,341  (2) 2,308 43  (101) 1,425 794  (1,040) 3,429  (8)
 
Total asset-backed securities
 12,510 48  (193)  (76) 971  (2,621) 10,639  (7) 12,510 45  (239) 1,194 1,086  (2,678) 11,918  (13)
 
Other debt securities
 77   (1) 12   88   77  (5) 9 12   93  
 
Total debt securities
 20,380 111 262 2,140 1,618  (5,387) 19,124  (21) 20,380 187 358 4,634 1,948  (6,290) 21,217  (33)
 
Marketable equity securities:
  
Perpetual preferred securities
 2,305 66  (26) 297   (13) 2,629   2,305 86  (33) 125 77  (26) 2,534  
Other marketable equity securities
 88    (38)   (34) 16   88    (37) 4  (36) 19  
 
Total marketable equity securities
 2,393 66  (26) 259   (47) 2,645   2,393 86  (33) 88 81  (62) 2,553  
 
Total securities available for sale
 22,773 177 236 2,399 1,618  (5,434) 21,769  (21) 22,773 273 325 4,722 2,029  (6,352) 23,770  (33)
 
Mortgages held for sale
 3,523  (15)   (251) 203  (200) 3,260  (17)(4) 3,523  (17)   (249) 294  (282) 3,269  (19)(3)
Loans
  52   (51) 366  367  52(4)  68   (81) 366  353  68(3)
Mortgage servicing rights (residential)
 16,004  (4,633)  1,998   (118) 13,251  (3,438)(4) 16,004  (6,440)  3,040   (118) 12,486  (4,570)(3)
Net derivative assets and liabilities:
  
Interest rate contracts
  (114) 2,673   (1,916)   643 426   (114) 4,283   (3,677) 159  651 279 
Equity contracts
  (344)  (7)  142 2  (25)  (232) 29   (344) 33  149 36   (126) 12 
Foreign exchange contracts
  (1)  (3)  2    (2)    (1)  (10)  11   (3)  (3)  
Credit contracts
  (330)  (692)  23 6   (993)  (671)  (330)  (688)   (4) 6   (1,016)  (606)
Other derivative contracts
  (43)  (65)  5    (103)    (43)  (52)   (7)    (102)  
 
Total derivative contracts
  (832) 1,906   (1,744) 8  (25)  (687)  (216)(5)  (832) 3,566   (3,528) 201  (3)  (596)  (315)(4)
 
Other assets
 1,373 25   (49)   (989) 360  (12)(4) 1,373 28   (67)   (989) 345  (20)(3)
Short sale liabilities (corporate debt securities)
  (26)  (1)   (42)  65  (4)    (26)  (2)   (37)  65   
Other liabilities (excluding derivatives)
  (1,085)  (778)  416  (359)   (1,806)  (779)  (1,085)  (1,135)  809  (359)   (1,770)  (1,133)
 
(1)The amounts presented as transfers into and out of Level 3 represent fair value as of the beginning of the period in which each transfer occurred.
(2) Represents only net gains (losses) that are due to changes in economic conditions and management’s estimates of fair value and excludes changes due to the collection/realization of cash flows over time.
(3)(2) Included in other noninterest income in the income statement.
(4)(3) Included in mortgage banking in the income statement.
(5)(4) Included in mortgage banking, trading activities and other noninterest income in the income statement.

115117


The changes in the first halfnine months of 2009 for Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized as follows:
                                                        
 
 Net unrealized  Net unrealized 
 Total net gains Purchases, gains (losses)  Total net gains Purchases, gains (losses) 
 (losses) included in sales, Net included in net  (losses) included in sales, Net included in net 
 Other issuances transfers income related  Other issuances transfers income related 
 Balance, compre- and into and/ Balance, to assets and  Balance, compre- and into and/ Balance, to assets and 
 beginning Net hensive settlements, or out of end liabilities held  beginning Net hensive settlements, or out of end liabilities held 
(in millions) of period income income net Level 3 (1) of period at period end (2) of period income income net Level 3 of period at period end (1) 
 

Six months ended June 30, 2009
 
Nine months ended September 30, 2009 
Trading assets (excluding derivatives) $3,495 42   (1,398) 336 2,475  82(3) $3,495 191   (1,536) 343 2,493  252(2)
Securities available for sale:  
Securities of U.S. states and political subdivisions 903 18 13 46  (75) 905  (6) 903 20 45 47  (53) 962  (6)
Mortgage-backed securities:  
Federal agencies 4     (4)    4     (4)   
Residential 3,510  (30) 884  (588) 2,137 5,913  (151) 3,510  (55) 1,100  (723)  (1,426) 2,406  (202)
Commercial 286  (118) 747 49 1,651 2,615  (11) 286  (119) 928 21 744 1,860  (55)
 
Total mortgage-backed securities 3,800  (148) 1,631  (539) 3,784 8,528  (162) 3,800  (174) 2,028  (702)  (686) 4,266  (257)
 
Corporate debt securities 282 2 56  (23)  (31) 286   282 2 44  (5)  (78) 245  
Collateralized debt obligations 2,083 55 189 104 317 2,748  (56) 2,083 72 558 233 317 3,263  (71)
Other 12,799 29 1,064 1,657 169 15,718  (53) 12,799 73 1,302 1,229  (2,233) 13,170  (87)
 
Total debt securities 19,867  (44) 2,953 1,245 4,164 28,185  (277) 19,867  (7) 3,977 802  (2,733) 21,906  (421)
 
Marketable equity securities:  
Perpetual preferred securities 2,775 86 115  (234)  (26) 2,716  (1) 2,775 96 169  (556) 5 2,489  (1)
Other marketable equity securities 50   (1) 62 16 127   50   (4) 30  (63) 13  
 
Total marketable equity securities 2,825 86 114  (172)  (10) 2,843  (1) 2,825 96 165  (526)  (58) 2,502  (1)
 
Total securities available for sale $22,692 42 3,067 1,073 4,154 31,028  (278) $22,692 89 4,142 276  (2,791) 24,408  (422)
 
Mortgages held for sale $4,718  (2)   (471)  (146) 4,099  (9)(4) $4,718  (66)   (662)  (116) 3,874  (77)(3)
Mortgage servicing rights (residential) 14,714  (2,587)  3,563  15,690  (508)(4) 14,714  (5,293)  5,079  14,500  (2,586)(3)
Net derivative assets and liabilities 37  (6)   (502) 265  (206)  (422)(5) 37 1,079  (1)  (1,454)  (23)  (362)  (252)(4)
Other assets (excluding derivatives) 1,231  (33)  28  1,226  (3)(4) 1,231  (42)  35  1,224  (40)(3)
Other liabilities (excluding derivatives)  (638)  (178)   (34)  (2)  (852)  (179)  (638)  (315)   (74)  (10)  (1,037)  (318)
 
(1)The amounts presented as transfers into and out of Level 3 represent fair value as of the beginning of the period in which each transfer occurred.
(2) Represents only net gains (losses) that are due to changes in economic conditions and management’s estimates of fair value and excludes changes due to the collection/realization of cash flows over time.
(3)(2) Included in other noninterest income in the income statement.
(4)(3) Included in mortgage banking in the income statement.
(5)(4) Included in mortgage banking, trading activities and other noninterest income in the income statement.

116118


Changes in Fair Value Levels
We monitor the availability of observable market data to assess the appropriate classification of financial instruments within the fair value hierarchy. Changes in economic conditions or model-based valuation techniques may require the transfer of financial instruments from one fair value level to another. In such instances, we reportThe amounts reported as transfers represent the transfer atfair value as of the beginning of the reporting period.quarter in which the transfer occurred.
We evaluate the significance of transfers between levels based upon the nature of the financial instrument and size of the transfer relative to total assets, total liabilities or total earnings. For the quarter ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010, there were no significant transfers in or out of Levels 1,Level 1. We transferred $918 million of securities available for sale from Level 3 to Level 2 or 3.primarily due to an increase in market activity for certain residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities.
Significant changes to Level 3 assets for the first halfnine months of 2010 are described as follows:
Our adoption of new consolidation accounting guidance on January 1, 2010, impacted Level 3 balances for certain financial instruments. Reductions in Level 3 balances, which represent derecognition of existing investments in newly consolidated VIEs, are reflected as transfers out for the following categories: trading assets, $276 million; securities available for sale, $1.9 billion; and mortgage servicing rights, $118 million. Increases in Level 3 balances, which represent newly consolidated VIE assets, are reflected as transfers in for the following categories: securities available for sale, $829 million; loans, $366 million; and long-term debt, $359 million.
We transferred $4.5 billion of securities available for sale from Level 3 to Level 2 due to an increase in the volume of trading activity for certain mortgage-backed and other asset-backed securities, which resulted in increased occurrences of observable market prices. We also transferred $1.2 billion of securities available for sale from Level 2 to Level 3, primarily due to a decrease in liquidity for certain asset-backed securities.
For the following categories: trading assets, $276 million; securities available for sale, $1.9 billion; and mortgage servicing rights, $118 million. Increases in Level 3 balances, which represent newly consolidated VIE assets, are reflected as transfers in for the following categories: securities available for sale, $829 million; loans, $366 million; and long-term debt, $359 million.
Wenine months ended September 30, 2009, we transferred $3.5$2.7 billion of debt securities available for sale from Level 3 to Level 2 due to an increase in the volume ofincreased trading activity for certain securities, which resulted in increased occurrences of observable market prices.
For the first half of 2009, $4.2 billion of debt securities available for sale were transferred on a net basis from Level 2 to Level 3 because significant inputs to the valuation became unobservable, largely due to reduced levels of market liquidity.activity.

117119


Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
We may be required, from time to time, to measure certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. These adjustments to fair value usually result from application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual assets. For assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010, and year ended December 31, 2009, that were still held in the balance sheet at each respective period end, the following table provides the fair value hierarchy and the carrying value of the related individual assets or portfolios at period end.
                                
 
 Carrying value at period end  Carrying value at period end 
(in millions) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total 
   
June 30, 2010
 
September 30, 2010
 

Mortgages held for sale(1)
 $ 2,470 724 3,194  $ 1,986 818 2,804 
Loans held for sale
  407  407   485  485 
Loans(2):
 
Loans:
 
Commercial and commercial real estate:
  
Commercial
  432 90 522   490 58 548 
Real estate mortgage
  603 2 605   1,288 2 1,290 
Real estate construction
  642  642   825  825 
   
Total commercial and commercial real estate
  1,677 92 1,769   2,603 60 2,663 
   
Consumer:
  
Real estate 1 - 4 family first mortgage
  5,196  5,196   4,775  4,775 
Real estate 1 - 4 family junior liens
  410  410   396  396 
Other
  83 17 100   106 20 126 
   
Total consumer
  5,689 17 5,706   5,277 20 5,297 
   
Foreign
  10  10   12  12 
   
Total loans(2)
  7,376 109 7,485   7,892 80 7,972 
   
Other assets:
 
Private equity investments
   26 26 
Foreclosed assets(3)
  356 23 379 
Operating lease assets
  22  22 
Other assets (3)
  547 51 598 
   
December 31, 2009  

Mortgages held for sale (1)
 $ 1,105 711 1,816  $ 1,105 711 1,816 
Loans held for sale  444  444   444  444 
Loans (2)  6,177 134 6,311   6,177 134 6,311 
Private equity investments   52 52 
Foreclosed assets (3)  199 38 237 
Operating lease assets  90 29 119 
Other assets (3)  289 119 408 
   
(1) Predominantly real estate 1-4 family first mortgage loans.
(2) Represents carrying value of loans for which adjustments are based on the appraised value of the collateral. The carrying value of loans fully charged-off, which includes unsecured lines and loans, is zero.
(3) RepresentsPrimarily represents the fair value of foreclosed real estate and other collateral owned that were measured at fair value subsequent to their initial classification as foreclosed assets.

118120


The following table presents the increase (decrease) in value of certain assets that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis for which a fair value adjustment has been included in the income statement.
        
 
(in millions)  
   
Six months ended June 30, 2010
 
Nine months ended September 30, 2010
 
Mortgages held for sale
 $23  $19 
Loans held for sale
 9  13 
Loans (1):
 
Loans:
 
Commercial and commercial real estate:
  
Commercial
  (1,110)  (1,804)
Real estate mortgage
  (250)  (566)
Real estate construction
  (255)  (391)
   
Total commercial and commercial real estate
  (1,615)  (2,761)
   
Consumer:
  
Real estate 1 - 4 family first mortgage
  (1,807)  (1,995)
Real estate 1 - 4 family junior liens
  (2,236)  (3,217)
Other
  (1,843)  (2,635)
   
Total consumer
  (5,886)  (7,847)
   
Foreign
    (91)
   
Total loans(1)
  (7,501)  (10,699)
   
Other assets:
 
Private equity investments
  (28)
Foreclosed assets (2)
  (115)
Operating lease assets
  (1)
Other assets(2)
  (177)
   
Total
 $(7,613) $(10,844)
   
Six months ended June 30, 2009 
Nine months ended September 30, 2009 
Mortgages held for sale $1  $(12)
Loans held for sale 119  143 
Loans (1)  (6,100)  (9,692)
Private equity investments  (61)
Foreclosed assets (2)  (225)
Operating lease assets  (16)
Other assets (2)  (226)
   
Total $(6,282) $(9,787)
   
   
(1) Represents write-downs of loans based on the appraised value of the collateral and write-downs of loans fully charged-off to zero.
(2) RepresentsPrimarily represents the losses on foreclosed real estate and other collateral owned that were measured at fair value subsequent to their initial classification as foreclosed assets.

119121


Alternative Investments
The following table summarizes our investments in various types of funds, which are included in trading assets, securities available for sale and other assets. We use the funds’ net asset values (NAVs) per share as a practical expedient to measure fair value on recurring and nonrecurring bases. The fair values presented in the table are based upon the funds’ NAVs or an equivalent measure.
                               
 
 Redemption  Redemption 
 Fair Unfunded Redemption notice  Fair Unfunded Redemption notice 
(in millions) value commitments frequency period  value commitments frequency period 
   
June 30, 2010
 
September 30, 2010
 
Offshore funds (1)
 $1,492  Daily - Annually 1 - 120 days  $1,581  Daily - Annually 1 - 120 days 
Funds of funds
 67  Monthly - Annually 10 - 120 days  70  Monthly - Annually 10 - 120 days 
Hedge funds
 18  Monthly - Annually 30 - 120 days  21  Monthly - Annually 30 - 120 days 
Private equity funds (2)
 1,774 760 N/A N/A  1,813 753 N/A N/A 
Venture capital funds (3)
 92 43 N/A N/A  89 40 N/A N/A 
   
Total
 $3,443 803  $3,574 793 
   
December 31, 2009  
Offshore funds (1) $1,270  Daily - Quarterly 1 - 90 days  $1,559  Daily - Quarterly 1 - 90 days 
Funds of funds 69  Monthly - Annually 10 - 120 days  69  Monthly - Annually 10 - 120 days 
Hedge funds 35  Monthly - Annually 30 - 180 days  35  Monthly - Annually 30 - 180 days
Private equity funds (2) 901 340 N/A N/A  901 340 N/A N/A 
Venture capital funds (3) 93 47 N/A N/A  93 47 N/A N/A 
   
Total $2,368 387  $2,657 387 
   
   
N/A — Not applicable
(1) Includes investments in funds that invest primarily in investment grade European fixed income securities. Redemption restrictions are in place for investments with a fair value of $67 million at June 30, 2010, and $76 million at December 31, 2009, due to lock-up provisions that will remain in effect until November 2012.
(2)Includes private equity funds that invest in equity and debt securities issued by private and publicly-held companies in connection with leveraged buy-outs, recapitalizations, and expansion opportunities. Substantially all of these investments do not allow redemptions. Alternatively, we receive distributions as the underlying assets of the funds liquidate, which we expect to occur over the next 10 years.
(3)Represents investments in funds that invest in domestic and foreign companies in a variety of industries, including information technology, financial services, and healthcare. These investments can never be redeemed with the funds. Instead, we receive distributions as the underlying assets of the fund liquidate, which we expect to occur over the next seven years.Balance has been revised from previously reported book value.
Offshore funds primarily invest in investment grade European fixed-income securities. Redemption restrictions are in place for investments with a fair value of $76 million at both September 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, due to lock-up provisions that will remain in effect until November 2012.
Private equity funds invest in equity and debt securities issued by private and publicly-held companies in connection with leveraged buyouts, recapitalizations and expansion opportunities. Substantially all of these investments do not allow redemptions. Alternatively, we receive distributions as the underlying assets of the funds liquidate, which we expect to occur over the next 10 years.
Venture capital funds invest in domestic and foreign companies in a variety of industries, including information technology, financial services and healthcare. These investments can never be redeemed with the funds. Instead, we receive distributions as the underlying assets of the fund liquidate, which we expect to occur over the next seven years.

120122


Fair Value Option
The following table reflects the differences between fair value carrying amount of certain assets and liabilities for which we have elected the fair value option and the contractual aggregate unpaid principal amount at maturity.
                                                
 
 June 30, 2010 Dec. 31, 2009  Sept. 30, 2010 Dec. 31, 2009 
 Fair value Fair value  Fair value Fair value 
 carrying carrying  carrying carrying 
 amount amount  amount amount 
 less less  less less 
 Fair value Aggregate aggregate Fair value Aggregate aggregate  Fair value Aggregate aggregate Fair value Aggregate aggregate 
 carrying unpaid unpaid carrying unpaid unpaid  carrying unpaid unpaid carrying unpaid unpaid 
(in millions) amount principal principal amount principal principal  amount principal principal amount principal principal 
 

Mortgages held for sale:
  
Total loans $34,877 34,084  793(1) 36,962 37,072  (110)(1) $42,791 41,908  883(1) 36,962 37,072  (110)(1)
Nonaccrual loans 317 640  (323) 268 560  (292) 320 672  (352) 268 560  (292)
Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing 47 56  (9) 49 63  (14) 38 42  (4) 49 63  (14)
Loans held for sale:  
Total loans 238 264  (26) 149 159  (10) 436 461  (25) 149 159  (10)
Nonaccrual loans 8 12  (4) 5 2 3  5 6  (1) 5 2 3 
Loans:  
Total loans 367 410  (43)     353 380  (27)    
Nonaccrual loans 13 15  (2)     14 16  (2)    
Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing 2 2      3 3     
Long-term debt  (361)  (413) 52     351 386  (35)    
 
(1) The difference between fair value carrying amount and aggregate unpaid principal includes changes in fair value recorded at and subsequent to funding, gains and losses on the related loan commitment prior to funding, and premiums on acquired loans.

121123


The assets accounted for under the fair value option are initially measured at fair value. Gains and losses from initial measurement and subsequent changes in fair value are recognized in earnings. The changes in fair values related to initial measurement and subsequent changes in fair value included in earnings for these assets measured at fair value are shown, by income statement line item, below.
                                
 
 2010 2009  2010 2009 
 Mortgage banking Mortgage banking    Mortgage banking Mortgage banking   
 noninterest income noninterest income    noninterest income noninterest income   
 Net gains Net gains    Net gains Net gains   
 on mortgage Other on mortgage Other  on mortgage Other on mortgage Other 
 loan origination/sales noninterest loan origination/sales noninterest  loan origination/sales noninterest loan origination/sales noninterest 
(in millions) activities (1) income activities (1) income  activities income activities income 
 

Quarter ended June 30,
 
Quarter ended September 30,
 
Mortgages held for sale $1,769  630   $1,986  1,541  
Loans held for sale  3  48   11  1 
Loans 8     16    
Long-term debt  (8)      (15)    
Other interests held   (6)  96   22  4 
 

Six months ended June 30,
 
Nine months ended September 30,
 
Mortgages held for sale $3,231  2,293   $5,217  3,834  
Loans held for sale  17  92   28  93 
Loans 52     68    
Long-term debt  (45)      (60)    
Other interests held   (46)  79    (24)  83 
 
(1)IncludesNet gains on mortgage loans originations/sales activities related to MHFS includes changes in the fair value of the servicing associated with MHFS.
Interest income on MHFS measured at fair value is calculated based on the note rate of the loan and is recorded in interest income in the income statement.
EarningsThe following table shows the estimated gains and losses from earnings attributable to instrument-specific credit risk related to assets accounted for under the fair value option included estimated losses of $47 million and $117 million for second quarter 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $69 million and $172 million for MHFS for the first half of 2010 and 2009, respectively, and estimated gains of $3 million, $21 million, $17 million and $42 million for LHFS for the same periods, respectively. option.
                 
 
          Nine months 
  Quarter ended Sept. 30, ended Sept. 30,
(in millions) 2010  2009  2010  2009 
  
Mortgages held for sale $(15)  (82)  (62)  (200)
Loans held for sale  11   15   28   57 
  
Total $(4)  (67)  (34)  (143)
  
  
For performing loans, instrument-specific credit risk gains or losses were derived principally by determining the change in fair value of the loans due to changes in the observable or implied credit spread. Credit spread is the market yield on the loans less the relevant risk-free benchmark interest rate. Since the second half of 2007, spreads have been significantly impacted by the lack of liquidity in the secondary market for mortgage loans. For nonperforming loans, we attribute all changes in fair value to instrument-specific credit risk.

122124


Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The table below is a summary of fair value estimates for financial instruments, excluding short-term financial assets and liabilities because carrying amounts approximate fair value, and excluding financial instruments recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. The carrying amounts in the following table are recorded in the balance sheet under the indicated captions.
We have not included assets and liabilities that are not financial instruments in our disclosure, such as the value of the long-term relationships with our deposit, credit card and trust customers, amortized MSRs, premises and equipment, goodwill and other intangibles, deferred taxes and other liabilities. The total of the fair value calculations presented does not represent, and should not be construed to represent, the underlying value of the Company.
                                
 
 June 30, 2010 Dec. 31, 2009  Sept. 30, 2010 Dec. 31, 2009 
 Carrying Estimated Carrying Estimated  Carrying Estimated Carrying Estimated 
(in millions) amount fair value amount fair value  amount fair value amount fair value 
   
Financial assets
  
Mortgages held for sale (1) $3,704 3,739 2,132 2,132  $3,210 3,220 2,132 2,132 
Loans held for sale (2) 3,761 3,842 5,584 5,719  752 780 5,584 5,719 
Loans, net (3) 728,016 708,667 744,225 717,798  716,604 706,306 744,225 717,798 
Nonmarketable equity investments (cost method) 9,793 10,041 9,793 9,889  8,506 8,764 9,793 9,889 
Financial liabilities
  
Deposits 815,623 816,655 824,018 824,678  814,512 816,233 824,018 824,678 
Long-term debt (3)(4) 184,659 189,525 203,784 205,752  162,753 169,755 203,784 205,752 
   
(1) Balance excludes mortgages held for sale for which the fair value option was elected, and therefore includes nonprime and other residential and commercial mortgages held for sale.
(2) Balance excludes loans held for sale for which the fair value option was elected.
(3) At JuneSeptember 30, 2010, loans and long-term debt exclude balances for which the fair value option was elected. Loans exclude lease financing with a carrying amount of $13.5$13.0 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, and $14.2 billion at December 31, 2009.
(4) The carrying amount and fair value exclude obligations under capital leases of $52$39 million at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, and $77 million at December 31, 2009.
Loan commitments, standby letters of credit and commercial and similar letters of credit are not included in the table above. These instruments generate ongoing fees at our current pricing levels, which are recognized over the term of the commitment period. In situations where the credit quality of the counterparty to a commitment has declined, we record a reserve. A reasonable estimate of the fair value of these instruments is the carrying value of deferred fees plus the related reserve. This amounted to $669 million at September 30, 2010, and $725 million at both June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009. Certain letters of credit that are hedged with derivative instruments are carried at fair value in trading assets or liabilities. For those letters of credit fair value is calculated based on readily quotable credit default spreads, using a market risk credit default swap model.

123125


13.13. PREFERRED STOCK
We are authorized to issue 20 million shares of preferred stock and 4 million shares of preference stock, both without par value. Preferred shares outstanding rank senior to common shares both as to dividends and liquidation preference but have no general voting rights. We have not issued any preference shares under this authorization. If issued, preference shares would be limited to one vote per share. Our total issued and outstanding preferred stock includes Dividend Equalization Preference (DEP) shares and Series J, K and L, which are presented in table below, and ESOP Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, which is presented in table on following page.
The following table provides detail of the preferred stock provided in the table below is unchanged at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, which is unchanged from December 31, 2009.
                 
  
  Shares           
  issued and      Carrying    
(in millions, except shares) outstanding  Par value  value  Discount 
  
DEP Shares
                
Dividend Equalization Preferred Shares,
$10 liquidation preference per share,
97,000 shares authorized
  96,546  $       
Series J(1)
                
8.00% Non-Cumulative Perpetual Class A
Preferred Stock, Series J, $1,000 liquidation
preference per share, 2,300,000 shares authorized
  2,150,375   2,150   1,995   155 
Series K(1)
                
7.98% Fixed-to-Floating Non-Cumulative
Perpetual Class A Preferred Stock, Series K,
$1,000 liquidation preference per share, 3,500,000
shares authorized
  3,352,000   3,352   2,876   476 
Series L(1)
                
7.50% Non-Cumulative Perpetual Convertible
Class A Preferred Stock, Series L, $1,000
liquidation preference per share, 4,025,000
shares authorized
  3,968,000   3,968   3,200   768 
  
Total  9,566,921  $9,470   8,071   1,399 
  
  
                 
 
  Shares           
  issued and      Carrying    
(in millions, except shares and liquidation preference per share) outstanding  Par value  value  Discount 
  

DEP Shares

                
Dividend Equalization Preferred Shares,                
$10 liquidation preference per share, 97,000 shares authorized  96,546  $       

Series J

                
8.00% Non-Cumulative Perpetual Class A                
Preferred Stock, Series J, $1,000 liquidation preference per share, 2,300,000 shares authorized  2,150,375   2,150   1,995   155 

Series K

                
7.98% Fixed-to-Floating Non-Cumulative                
Perpetual Class A Preferred Stock, Series K, $1,000 liquidation preference per share, 3,500,000 shares authorized  3,352,000   3,352   2,876   476 

Series L

                
7.50% Non-Cumulative Perpetual Convertible                
Class A Preferred Stock, Series L, $1,000 liquidation preference per share, 4,025,000 shares authorized  3,968,000   3,968   3,200   768 
  
Total (1)  9,566,921  $9,470   8,071   1,399 
  
  
(1) PreferredSeries J, K and L preferred shares qualify as Tier 1 capital.
In addition to the preferred stock issued and outstanding described in the table above, at September 30, 2010, we have the following preferred stock authorized with no shares issued and outstanding:
 Series A Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A, $100,000 liquidation preference per share, 25,001 shares authorized
 Series B Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series B, $100,000 liquidation preference per share, 17,501 shares authorized
Series G – 7.25% Class A Preferred Stock, Series G, $15,000 liquidation preference per share, 50,000 shares authorized
Series H – Floating Class A Preferred Stock, Series H, $20,000 liquidation preference per share, 50,000 shares authorized
Series I –
Series G — 7.25% Class A Preferred Stock, Series G, $15,000 liquidation preference per share, 50,000 shares authorized
Series H — Floating Class A Preferred Stock, Series H, $20,000 liquidation preference per share, 50,000 shares authorized
Series I — 5.80% Fixed to Floating Class A Preferred Stock, Series I, $100,000 liquidation preference per share, 25,010 shares authorized

124126


ESOP Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock All shares of our ESOP (Employee Stock Ownership Plan) Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (ESOP Preferred Stock) were issued to a trustee acting on behalf of the Wells Fargo & Company 401(k) Plan (the 401(k) Plan). Dividends on the ESOP Preferred Stock are cumulative from the date of initial issuance and are payable quarterly at annual rates ranging from 8.50% to 11.75%, depending uponbased on the year of issuance. Each share of ESOP Preferred Stock released from the unallocated reserve of the 401(k) Plan is converted into shares of our common stock based on the stated value of the ESOP Preferred Stock and the then current market price of our common stock. The ESOP Preferred Stock is also convertible at the option of the holder at any time, unless previously redeemed. We have the option to redeem the ESOP Preferred Stock at any time, in whole or in part, at a redemption price per share equal to the higher of (a) $1,000 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends or (b) the fair market value, as defined in the Certificates of Designation for the ESOP Preferred Stock.
                                                
 
 Shares issued and outstanding Carrying value Adjustable  Shares issued and outstanding Carrying value Adjustable 
 June 30, Dec. 31, June 30, Dec. 31, dividend rate  Sept. 30, Dec. 31, Sept. 30, Dec. 31, dividend rate 
(in millions, except shares) 2010 2009 2010 2009 Minimum Maximum  2010 2009 2010 2009 Minimum Maximum 
 

ESOP Preferred Stock(1)
 
ESOP Preferred Stock,
 
$1,000 liquidation preference per share
 
2010 509,814  $510   9.50% 10.50  374,618  $375   9.50% 10.50 
2008 112,029 120,289 112 120 10.50 11.50  110,254 120,289 110 120 10.50 11.50 
2007 95,524 97,624 95 98 10.75 11.75  94,494 97,624 94 98 10.75 11.75 
2006 69,782 71,322 70 71 10.75 11.75  69,032 71,322 69 71 10.75 11.75 
2005 50,552 51,687 50 52 9.75 10.75  49,992 51,687 50 52 9.75 10.75 
2004 35,615 36,425 36 37 8.50 9.50  35,215 36,425 35 37 8.50 9.50 
2003 20,974 21,450 21 21 8.50 9.50  20,741 21,450 21 21 8.50 9.50 
2002 11,677 11,949 12 12 10.50 11.50  11,543 11,949 12 12 10.50 11.50 
2001 3,205 3,273 3 3 10.50 11.50  3,172 3,273 3 3 10.50 11.50 
   
Total ESOP Preferred Stock 909,172 414,019 $909 414 
Total ESOP Preferred Stock (1) 769,061 414,019 $769 414 
   
Unearned ESOP shares (2) $(977)  (442)  $(826)  (442) 
   
 
(1) Liquidation preference $1,000. At JuneSeptember 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009, additional paid-in capital included $68$57 million and $28 million, respectively, related to preferred stock.
(2) We recorded a corresponding charge to unearned ESOP shares in connection with the issuance of the ESOP Preferred Stock. The unearned ESOP shares are reduced as shares of the ESOP Preferred Stock are committed to be released.

125127


14.14. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
We sponsor a noncontributory qualified defined benefit retirement plan, the Wells Fargo & Company Cash Balance Plan (Cash Balance Plan), which covers eligible employees of Wells Fargo; the benefits earned under the Cash Balance Plan were frozen effective July 1, 2009.
On April 28, 2009, the Board of Directors approved amendments to freeze the benefits earned under the Wells Fargo qualified and supplemental Cash Balance Plans and the Wachovia Corporation Pension Plan, a cash balance plan that covered eligible employees of the legacy Wachovia Corporation, and to merge the Wachovia Pension Plan into the qualified Cash Balance Plan. These actions became effective on July 1, 2009.
The net periodic benefit cost was:
                                                
 
 2010 2009  2010 2009 
 Pension benefits Pension benefits    Pension benefits Pension benefits   
 Non- Other Non- Other  Non- Other Non- Other 
(in millions) Qualified qualified benefits Qualified qualified benefits  Qualified qualified benefits Qualified qualified benefits 
 

Quarter ended June 30,
 
Quarter ended September 30,
 
Service cost $2  3 100 4 3  $1  4 2  4 
Interest cost 138 9 19 149 11 21  139 10 19 150 11 20 
Expected return on plan assets  (179)   (7)  (160)   (7)  (180)   (7)  (160)   (7)
Amortization of net actuarial loss 26 1  48 1 1  27   20   
Amortization of prior service cost    (1)   (1)  (1)    (1)    (1)
Curtailment gain     (32)  (35)  
Curtailment gain (loss) 2   (3)    
 
Net periodic benefit cost $(13) 10 14 105  (20) 17 
Net periodic benefit cost (income) $(11) 10 12 12 11 16 
 

Six months ended June 30,
 
Nine months ended September 30,
 
Service cost $3  6 207 8 6  $4  10 209 8 10 
Interest cost 277 18 39 294 21 42  416 28 58 444 32 62 
Expected return on plan assets  (358)   (14)  (323)   (14)  (538)   (21)  (483)   (21)
Amortization of net actuarial loss 52 2  154 3 2  79 2  174 3 2 
Amortization of prior service cost    (2)   (2)  (2)    (3)   (3)  (3)
Curtailment gain     (32)  (35)  
Curtailment gain (loss) 2   (3)  (32)  (35)  
 
Net periodic benefit cost $(26) 20 29 300  (5) 34 
Net periodic benefit cost (income) $(37) 30 41 312 5 50 
 
 

126128


15.15. EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
The table below shows earnings per common share and diluted earnings per common share and reconciles the numerator and denominator of both earnings per common share calculations.
For the quarters ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, options to purchase 156.0 million and 272.1 million weighted-average shares, respectively, and warrants to purchase 78.6 and 110.3 weighted-average shares, respectively, and for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, options to purchase 187.0 million and 290.1 million weighted-average shares, respectively, and warrants to purchase 94.4 million and 110.3 million weighted-average shares, respectively, were outstanding but not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per common share because the exercise price was higher than the weighted-average market price, and therefore were antidilutive.
                                
 
 Quarter ended June 30, Six months ended June 30, Quarter ended Sept. 30, Nine months ended Sept. 30,
(in millions, except per share amounts) 2010 2009 2010 2009  2010 2009 2010 2009 
 
Wells Fargo net income $3,062 3,172 5,609 6,217  $3,339 3,235 8,948 9,452 
Less: Preferred stock dividends, accretion and other (1) 184 597 359 1,258  189 598 548 1,856 
 
Wells Fargo net income applicable to common stock (numerator) $2,878 2,575 5,250 4,959  $3,150 2,637 8,400 7,596 
 
Earnings per common share
  
Average common shares outstanding (denominator) 5,219.7 4,483.1 5,205.1 4,365.9  5,240.1 4,678.3 5,216.9 4,471.2 
Per share $0.55 0.58 1.01 1.14  $0.60 0.56 1.61 1.70 
 
Diluted earnings per common share
  
Average common shares outstanding 5,219.7 4,483.1 5,205.1 4,365.9  5,240.1 4,678.3 5,216.9 4,471.2 
Add: Stock options 32.9 18.2 32.1 9.0  23.7 27.7 29.1 13.8 
Restricted share rights 8.2 0.3 5.8 0.2  9.4 0.4 6.9 0.3 
 
Diluted average common shares outstanding (denominator) 5,260.8 4,501.6 5,243.0 4,375.1  5,273.2 4,706.4 5,252.9 4,485.3 
 
Per share $0.55 0.57 1.00 1.13  $0.60 0.56 1.60 1.69 
 
 
(1) For the quarter and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010, includes $185$184 million and $369$553 million, respectively, of preferred stock dividends.
The following table presents the outstanding options and warrants to purchase shares of common stock that were anti-dilutive (the exercise price was higher than the weighted-average market price), and therefore not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per common share.
                 
 
  Weighted-average shares 
  Quarter ended Sept. 30, Nine months ended Sept. 30,
(in millions) 2010  2009  2010  2009 
  
Options  211.8   220.6   212.8   288.3 
Warrants  39.9   110.3   75.1   110.3 
  

127129


16.16. OPERATING SEGMENTS
We have three lines of business for management reporting: Community Banking; Wholesale Banking; and Wealth, Brokerage and Retirement. The results for these lines of business are based on our management accounting process, which assigns balance sheet and income statement items to each responsible operating segment. This process is dynamic and, unlike financial accounting, there is no comprehensive, authoritative guidance for management accounting equivalent to GAAP. The management accounting process measures the performance of the operating segments based on our management structure and is not necessarily comparable with similar information for other financial services companies. We define our operating segments by product type and customer segment. If the management structure and/or the allocation process changes, allocations, transfers and assignments may change. In first quarter 2010, we conformed certain funding and allocation methodologies of legacy Wachovia to those of Wells Fargo; in addition, integration expense related to mergers other than the Wachovia merger are now included in segment results. Prior periods have been revised to reflect both changes.
Community Bankingoffers a complete line of diversified financial products and services to consumers and small businesses with annual sales generally up to $20 million in which the owner generally is the financial decision maker. Community Banking also offers investment management and other services to retail customers and securities brokerage through affiliates. These products and services include theWells Fargo Advantage FundsSM, a family of mutual funds. Loan products include lines of credit, equity lines and loans, equipment and transportation loans, education loans, origination and purchase of residential mortgage loans and servicing of mortgage loans and credit cards. Other credit products and financial services available to small businesses and their owners include receivables and inventory financing, equipment leases, real estate and other commercial financing, Small Business Administration financing, venture capital financing, cash management, payroll services, retirement plans, Health Savings Accounts, credit cards, and merchant payment processing. Community Banking also purchases sales finance contracts from retail merchants throughout the United States and directly from auto dealers in Puerto Rico. Consumer and business deposit products include checking accounts, savings deposits, market rate accounts, Individual Retirement Accounts, time deposits and debit cards.
Community Banking serves customers through a complete range of channels, including traditional banking stores, in-store banking centers, business centers, ATMs, Online and Mobile Banking, andWells Fargo Customer Connection, a 24-hours a day, seven days a week telephone service.

128130


Wholesale Bankingprovides financial solutions to businesses across the United States with annual sales generally in excess of $10 million and to financial institutions globally. Wholesale Banking provides a complete line of commercial, corporate, capital markets, cash management and real estate banking products and services. These include traditional commercial loans and lines of credit, letters of credit, asset-based lending, equipment leasing, mezzanine financing, high-yield debt, international trade facilities, trade financing, collection services, foreign exchange services, treasury management, investment management, institutional fixed-income sales, interest rate, commodity and equity risk management, online/electronic products such as theCommercial Electronic Office® (CEO®) portal, insurance, corporate trust fiduciary and agency services, and investment banking services. Wholesale Banking manages customer investments through institutional separate accounts and mutual funds, including the Wells Fargo Advantage Funds and Wells Capital Management. Wholesale Banking also supports the CRE market with products and services such as construction loans for commercial and residential development, land acquisition and development loans, secured and unsecured lines of credit, interim financing arrangements for completed structures, rehabilitation loans, affordable housing loans and letters of credit, permanent loans for securitization, CRE loan servicing and real estate and mortgage brokerage services.
Wealth, Brokerage and Retirementprovides a full range of financial advisory, lending, fiduciary, and investment management services to clients using a planning approach to meet each client’s needs. Wealth Management uses an integrated model to provide affluent and high-net-worth customers with a complete range of wealth management solutions and services. Family Wealth meets the unique needs of ultra-high-net-worth customers managing multi-generational assets — those with at least $50 million in assets. Retail Brokerage’s financial advisors serveBrokerage serves customers’ advisory, brokerage and financial needs, including investment management, portfolio monitoring and estate planning as part of one of the largest full-service brokerage firms in the United States. TheyBrokerage also offeroffers access to banking products, insurance, and investment banking services. First Clearing LLC, our correspondent clearing firm, provides technology, product and other business support to broker-dealers across the United States. Retirement is a national leader in providing institutional retirement and trust services (including 401(k) and pension plan record keeping) for businesses, retail retirement solutions for individuals, and reinsurance services for the life insurance industry.
Otherincludes corporate items (such as integration expenses related to the Wachovia merger) not specific to a business segment and elimination of certain items that are included in more than one business segment.

129131


The following table presents certain financial information and related metrics by operating segment and in total for the consolidated company.
                                                                                
 
 Community Wholesale Wealth, Brokerage Consolidated  Community Wholesale Wealth, Brokerage Consolidated 
(income/expense in millions, Banking Banking and Retirement Other (3) Company 
average balances in billions) 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 
(income/expense in millions, average Banking Banking and Retirement Other (3) Company 
balances in billions) 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 
 
Quarter ended June 30,
 
Quarter ended September 30,
 
Net interest income (1) $8,113 8,953 2,978 2,460 684 637  (326)  (286) 11,449 11,764  $7,864 8,841 2,881 2,535 683 580  (330)  (272) 11,098 11,684 
Provision for credit losses 3,357 4,303 626 738 81 111  (75)  (66) 3,989 5,086  3,165 4,635 270 1,368 77 233  (67)  (125) 3,445 6,111 
Noninterest income 5,614 6,285 2,675 2,775 2,183 2,187  (527)  (504) 9,945 10,743  5,723 6,709 2,367 2,399 2,229 2,188  (543)  (514) 9,776 10,782 
Noninterest expense 7,711 7,922 2,840 2,802 2,350 2,300  (155)  (327) 12,746 12,697  7,356 7,034 2,696 2,647 2,420 2,333  (219)  (330) 12,253 11,684 
 
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit) 2,659 3,013 2,187 1,695 436 413  (623)  (397) 4,659 4,724  3,066 3,881 2,282 919 415 202  (587)  (331) 5,176 4,671 
Income tax expense (benefit) 811 849 775 619 165 158  (237)  (151) 1,514 1,475  991 1,089 826 322 157 69  (223)  (125) 1,751 1,355 
 
Net income (loss) before noncontrolling interests 1,848 2,164 1,412 1,076 271 255  (386)  (246) 3,145 3,249  2,075 2,792 1,456 597 258 133  (364)  (206) 3,425 3,316 
Less: Net income from noncontrolling interests 82 73  7 1  (3)   83 77  73 56 11 3 2 22   86 81 
 
Net income (loss) (2) $1,766 2,091 1,412 1,069 270 258  (386)  (246) 3,062 3,172  $2,002 2,736 1,445 594 256 111  (364)  (206) 3,339 3,235 
 
Average loans $539.1 565.8 223.4 258.4 42.6 46.0  (32.6)  (36.3) 772.5 833.9  $527.0 553.2 222.5 247.0 42.6 45.4  (32.6)  (35.4) 759.5 810.2 
Average assets 778.4 824.0 362.4 377.7 141.0 127.0  (57.6)  (53.8) 1,224.2 1,274.9  778.1 804.9 363.7 368.4 138.2 129.8  (59.6)  (57.0) 1,220.4 1,246.1 
Average core deposits 533.4 565.6 161.5 137.4 121.5 113.5  (54.6)  (50.8) 761.8 765.7  535.7 550.2 172.2 146.8 120.7 116.3  (56.6)  (54.0) 772.0 759.3 
 
Six months ended June 30,
 
Nine months ended September 30,
 
Net interest income (1) $16,420 17,620 5,478 4,803 1,348 1,278  (650)  (561) 22,596 23,140  $24,284 26,461 8,359 7,338 2,031 1,858  (980)  (833) 33,694 34,824 
Provision for credit losses 7,887 8,323 1,425 1,281 144 134  (137)  (94) 9,319 9,644  11,052 12,958 1,695 2,649 221 367  (204)  (219) 12,764 15,755 
Noninterest income 11,369 12,012 5,500 5,325 4,429 4,065  (1,052)  (1,018) 20,246 20,384  17,092 18,721 7,867 7,724 6,658 6,253  (1,595)  (1,532) 30,022 31,166 
Noninterest expense 14,941 15,332 5,500 5,335 4,740 4,535  (318)  (687) 24,863 24,515  22,297 22,366 8,196 7,982 7,160 6,868  (537)  (1,017) 37,116 36,199 
 
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit) 4,961 5,977 4,053 3,512 893 674  (1,247)  (798) 8,660 9,365  8,027 9,858 6,335 4,431 1,308 876  (1,834)  (1,129) 13,836 14,036 
Income tax expense (benefit) 1,610 1,806 1,441 1,260 338 265  (474)  (304) 2,915 3,027  2,601 2,895 2,267 1,582 495 334  (697)  (429) 4,666 4,382 
 
Net income (loss) before noncontrolling interests 3,351 4,171 2,612 2,252 555 409  (773)  (494) 5,745 6,338  5,426 6,963 4,068 2,849 813 542  (1,137)  (700) 9,170 9,654 
Less: Net income (loss) from noncontrolling interests 130 134 3 12 3  (25)   136 121  203 190 14 15 5  (3)   222 202 
 
Net income (loss) (2) $3,221 4,037 2,609 2,240 552 434  (773)  (494) 5,609 6,217  $5,223 6,773 4,054 2,834 808 545  (1,137)  (700) 8,948 9,452 
 
Average loans $547.1 566.8 227.8 268.3 43.2 46.3  (33.2)  (36.7) 784.9 844.7  $540.3 562.2 226.0 261.1 43.0 46.0  (33.0)  (36.2) 776.3 833.1 
Average assets 781.6 817.4 361.9 393.1 139.4 122.1  (57.8)  (50.3) 1,225.1 1,282.3  780.4 813.2 362.5 384.7 139.0 124.7  (58.4)  (52.5) 1,223.5 1,270.1 
Average core deposits 532.8 560.3 161.2 138.5 121.3 108.2  (54.8)  (47.2) 760.5 759.8  533.7 556.9 164.9 141.3 121.1 110.9  (55.4)  (49.4) 764.3 759.7 
 
(1) Net interest income is the difference between interest earned on assets and the cost of liabilities to fund those assets. Interest earned includes actual interest earned on segment assets and, if the segment has excess liabilities, interest credits for providing funding to other segments. The cost of liabilities includes interest expense on segment liabilities and, if the segment does not have enough liabilities to fund its assets, a funding charge based on the cost of excess liabilities from another segment.
(2) Represents segment net income (loss) for Community Banking; Wholesale Banking; and Wealth, Brokerage and Retirement segments and Wells Fargo net income for the consolidated company.
(3) Includes Wachovia integration expenses and the elimination of items that are included in both Community Banking and Wealth, Brokerage and Retirement, largely representing wealth management customers serviced and products sold in the stores.

130132


17.17. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Following are the condensed consolidating financial statements of the Parent and Wells Fargo Financial, Inc. (WFFI) and its wholly-ownedowned subsidiaries.
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income
                     
  
  Quarter ended June 30, 2010 
          Other       
          consolidating     Consolidated 
(in millions) Parent  WFFI  subsidiaries  Eliminations  Company 
 
Dividends from subsidiaries:                    
Bank $5,975         (5,975)   
Nonbank  15         (15)   
Interest income from loans     693   9,622   (38)  10,277 
Interest income from subsidiaries  302      9   (311)   
Other interest income  86   30   3,079      3,195 
 
Total interest income  6,378   723   12,710   (6,339)  13,472 
 
Deposits        714      714 
Short-term borrowings  21   11   93   (104)  21 
Long-term debt  729   260   489   (245)  1,233 
Other interest expense  1      54      55 
 
Total interest expense  751   271   1,350   (349)  2,023 
 
Net interest income
  5,627   452   11,360   (5,990)  11,449 
Provision for credit losses     198   3,791      3,989 
 
Net interest income after provision for credit losses  5,627   254   7,569   (5,990)  7,460 
 
Noninterest income
                    
Fee income — nonaffiliates     26   6,027      6,053 
Other  171   29   3,880   (188)  3,892 
 
Total noninterest income  171   55   9,907   (188)  9,945 
 
Noninterest expense
                    
Salaries and benefits  (17)  26   6,843      6,852 
Other  207   210   5,665   (188)  5,894 
 
Total noninterest expense  190   236   12,508   (188)  12,746 
 
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit) and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries
  5,608   73   4,968   (5,990)  4,659 
Income tax expense (benefit)  (118)  26   1,606      1,514 
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries  (2,664)        2,664    
 
Net income (loss) before noncontrolling interests
  3,062   47   3,362   (3,326)  3,145 
Less: Net income from noncontrolling interests        83      83 
 
Parent, WFFI, Other and Wells Fargo net income (loss)
 $3,062   47   3,279   (3,326)  3,062 
 
 

131


Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income
                     
  
  Quarter ended June 30, 2009 
          Other        
          consolidating      Consolidated 
(in millions) Parent  WFFI  subsidiaries  Eliminations  Company 
 

Dividends from subsidiaries:
                    
Bank $1         (1)   
Nonbank  209         (209)   
Interest income from loans     867   9,669   (4)  10,532 
Interest income from subsidiaries  580         (580)   
Other interest income  114   27   3,630   (2)  3,769 
 
Total interest income  904   894   13,299   (796)  14,301 
 

Deposits
        970   (13)  957 
Short-term borrowings  50   8   238   (241)  55 
Long-term debt  860   338   699   (412)  1,485 
Other interest expense        40      40 
 
Total interest expense  910   346   1,947   (666)  2,537 
 

Net interest income
  (6)  548   11,352   (130)  11,764 
Provision for credit losses     348   4,738      5,086 
 
Net interest income after provision for credit losses  (6)  200   6,614   (130)  6,678 
 

Noninterest income
                    
Fee income — nonaffiliates     30   5,717      5,747 
Other  141   38   5,328   (511)  4,996 
 
Total noninterest income  141   68   11,045   (511)  10,743 
 

Noninterest expense
                    
Salaries and benefits  144   31   6,550      6,725 
Other  153   177   6,151   (509)  5,972 
 
Total noninterest expense  297   208   12,701   (509)  12,697 
 

Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit) and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries
  (162)  60   4,958   (132)  4,724 
Income tax expense (benefit)  (76)  22   1,529      1,475 
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries  3,258         (3,258)   
 

Net income (loss) before noncontrolling interests
  3,172   38   3,429   (3,390)  3,249 
Less: Net income from noncontrolling interests        77      77 
 

Parent, WFFI, Other and Wells Fargo net income (loss)
 $3,172   38   3,352   (3,390)  3,172 
 
 

132


Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income
                                        
 
 Six months ended June 30, 2010  Quarter ended September 30, 2010 
 Other    Other   
 consolidating Consolidated  consolidating Consolidated 
(in millions) Parent WFFI subsidiaries Eliminations Company  Parent WFFI subsidiaries Eliminations Company 
 
Dividends from subsidiaries:  
Bank $5,975    (5,975)   $3,926    (3,926)  
Nonbank 21    (21)        
Interest income from loans  1,419 18,972  (76) 20,315   657 9,267  (145) 9,779 
Interest income from subsidiaries 650  9  (659)   386  5  (391)  
Other interest income 164 60 6,158  6,382  65 28 3,258  3,351 
 
Total interest income 6,810 1,479 25,139  (6,731) 26,697  4,377 685 12,530  (4,462) 13,130 
 
Deposits   1,449  1,449    721  721 
Short-term borrowings 44 20 187  (212) 39  125 13 214  (325) 27 
Long-term debt 1,447 547 1,038  (523) 2,509  746 220 471  (211) 1,226 
Other interest expense 1  103  104    58  58 
 
Total interest expense 1,492 567 2,777  (735) 4,101  871 233 1,464  (536) 2,032 
 
Net interest income
 5,318 912 22,362  (5,996) 22,596  3,506 452 11,066  (3,926) 11,098 
Provision for credit losses  519 8,800  9,319   216 3,229  3,445 
 
Net interest income after provision for credit losses 5,318 393 13,562  (5,996) 13,277  3,506 236 7,837  (3,926) 7,653 
 
Noninterest income
  
Fee income — nonaffiliates  54 11,806  11,860   29 5,606  5,635 
Other 382 76 8,267  (339) 8,386   (34) 34 4,318  (177) 4,141 
 
Total noninterest income 382 130 20,073  (339) 20,246   (34) 63 9,924  (177) 9,776 
 
Noninterest expense
  
Salaries and benefits  (50) 96 13,434  13,480   (14) 25 6,821  6,832 
Other 465 357 10,900  (339) 11,383  222 136 5,240  (177) 5,421 
 
Total noninterest expense 415 453 24,334  (339) 24,863  208 161 12,061  (177) 12,253 
 
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit) and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries
 5,285 70 9,301  (5,996) 8,660  3,264 138 5,700  (3,926) 5,176 
Income tax expense (benefit)  (208) 25 3,098  2,915   (235) 48 1,938  1,751 
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries 116    (116)    (160)   160  
 
Net income (loss) before noncontrolling interests
 5,609 45 6,203  (6,112) 5,745  3,339 90 3,762  (3,766) 3,425 
Less: Net income from noncontrolling interests   136  136    86  86 
 
Parent, WFFI, Other and Wells Fargo net income (loss)
 $5,609 45 6,067  (6,112) 5,609  $3,339 90 3,676  (3,766) 3,339 
   
   

133


Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income
                                        
 
 Six months ended June 30, 2009  Quarter ended September 30, 2009 
 Other    Other   
 consolidating Consolidated  consolidating Consolidated 
(in millions) Parent WFFI subsidiaries Eliminations Company  Parent WFFI subsidiaries Eliminations Company 
 
Dividends from subsidiaries:  
Bank $717    (717)   $2,411    (2,411)  
Nonbank 209    (209)   200    (200)  
Interest income from loans  1,852 19,454  (9) 21,297   827 9,346  (3) 10,170 
Interest income from subsidiaries 1,231    (1,231)   480    (480)  
Other interest income 227 53 7,042  (5) 7,317  104 27 3,662 5 3,798 
 
Total interest income 2,384 1,905 26,496  (2,171) 28,614  3,195 854 13,008  (3,089) 13,968 
 
Deposits   1,977  (21) 1,956    917  (12) 905 
Short-term borrowings 114 17 574  (527) 178  32 11 156  (167) 32 
Long-term debt 1,889 706 1,482  (813) 3,264  761 304 592  (356) 1,301 
Other interest expense   76  76    46  46 
 
Total interest expense 2,003 723 4,109  (1,361) 5,474  793 315 1,711  (535) 2,284 
 
Net interest income
 381 1,182 22,387  (810) 23,140  2,402 539 11,297  (2,554) 11,684 
Provision for credit losses  1,023 8,621  9,644   463 5,648  6,111 
 
Net interest income after provision for credit losses 381 159 13,766  (810) 13,496  2,402 76 5,649  (2,554) 5,573 
 
Noninterest income
  
Fee income — nonaffiliates  83 11,027  11,110   32 5,844  5,876 
Other 314 71 10,025  (1,136) 9,274  339 57 5,186  (676) 4,906 
 
Total noninterest income 314 154 21,052  (1,136) 20,384  339 89 11,030  (676) 10,782 
 
Noninterest expense
  
Salaries and benefits 282 50 12,887  13,219  29 42 6,442  6,513 
Other 263 371 11,796  (1,134) 11,296  110 179 5,589  (707) 5,171 
 
Total noninterest expense 545 421 24,683  (1,134) 24,515  139 221 12,031  (707) 11,684 
 
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit) and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries
 150  (108) 10,135  (812) 9,365  2,602  (56) 4,648  (2,523) 4,671 
Income tax expense (benefit)  (234)  (35) 3,296  3,027   (175)  (18) 1,548  1,355 
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries 5,833    (5,833)   458    (458)  
 
Net income (loss) before noncontrolling interests
 6,217  (73) 6,839  (6,645) 6,338  3,235  (38) 3,100  (2,981) 3,316 
Less: Net income from noncontrolling interests   121  121   1 80  81 
 
Parent, WFFI, Other and Wells Fargo net income (loss)
 $6,217  (73) 6,718  (6,645) 6,217  $3,235  (39) 3,020  (2,981) 3,235 
   
   

134


Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income
                     
 
  Nine months ended September 30, 2010 
          Other        
          consolidating      Consolidated 
(in millions) Parent  WFFI  subsidiaries  Eliminations  Company 
  
Dividends from subsidiaries:                    
Bank $9,901         (9,901)   
Nonbank  21         (21)   
Interest income from loans     2,076   28,239   (221)  30,094 
Interest income from subsidiaries  1,036      14   (1,050)   
Other interest income  229   88   9,416      9,733 
  
Total interest income  11,187   2,164   37,669   (11,193)  39,827 
  
Deposits        2,170      2,170 
Short-term borrowings  169   33   401   (537)  66 
Long-term debt  2,193   767   1,509   (734)  3,735 
Other interest expense  1      161      162 
  
Total interest expense  2,363   800   4,241   (1,271)  6,133 
  
Net interest income
  8,824   1,364   33,428   (9,922)  33,694 
Provision for credit losses     735   12,029      12,764 
  
Net interest income after provision for credit losses  8,824   629   21,399   (9,922)  20,930 
  
Noninterest income
                    
Fee income — nonaffiliates     83   17,412      17,495 
Other  348   110   12,585   (516)  12,527 
  
Total noninterest income  348   193   29,997   (516)  30,022 
  
Noninterest expense
                    
Salaries and benefits  (64)  121   20,255      20,312 
Other  687   493   16,140   (516)  16,804 
  
Total noninterest expense  623   614   36,395   (516)  37,116 
  
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit) and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries
  8,549   208   15,001   (9,922)  13,836 
Income tax expense (benefit)  (443)  73   5,036      4,666 
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries  (44)        44    
  
Net income (loss) before noncontrolling interests
  8,948   135   9,965   (9,878)  9,170 
Less: Net income from noncontrolling interests        222      222 
  
Parent, WFFI, Other and Wells Fargo net income (loss)
 $8,948   135   9,743   (9,878)  8,948 
  
  

135


Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income
                     
 
  Nine months ended September 30, 2009 
          Other        
          consolidating      Consolidated 
(in millions) Parent  WFFI  subsidiaries  Eliminations  Company 
  
Dividends from subsidiaries:                    
Bank $3,128         (3,128)   
Nonbank  409         (409)   
Interest income from loans     2,679   28,800   (12)  31,467 
Interest income from subsidiaries  1,711         (1,711)   
Other interest income  331   80   10,704      11,115 
  
Total interest income  5,579   2,759   39,504   (5,260)  42,582 
  
Deposits        2,894   (33)  2,861 
Short-term borrowings  146   28   730   (694)  210 
Long-term debt  2,650   1,010   2,074   (1,169)  4,565 
Other interest expense        122      122 
  
Total interest expense  2,796   1,038   5,820   (1,896)  7,758 
  
Net interest income
  2,783   1,721   33,684   (3,364)  34,824 
Provision for credit losses     1,486   14,269      15,755 
  
Net interest income after provision for credit losses  2,783   235   19,415   (3,364)  19,069 
  
Noninterest income
                    
Fee income — nonaffiliates     115   16,871      16,986 
Other  653   128   15,211   (1,812)  14,180 
  
Total noninterest income  653   243   32,082   (1,812)  31,166 
  
Noninterest expense
                    
Salaries and benefits  311   92   19,329      19,732 
Other  373   550   17,385   (1,841)  16,467 
  
Total noninterest expense  684   642   36,714   (1,841)  36,199 
  
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit) and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries
  2,752   (164)  14,783   (3,335)  14,036 
Income tax expense (benefit)  (409)  (53)  4,844      4,382 
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries  6,291         (6,291)   
  
Net income (loss) before noncontrolling interests
  9,452   (111)  9,939   (9,626)  9,654 
Less: Net income from noncontrolling interests     1   201      202 
  
Parent, WFFI, Other and Wells Fargo net income (loss)
 $9,452   (112)  9,738   (9,626)  9,452 
  
  

136


Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
                                        
 June 30, 2010  September 30, 2010 
 Other    Other   
 consolidating Consolidated  consolidating Consolidated 
(in millions) Parent WFFI subsidiaries Eliminations Company  Parent WFFI subsidiaries Eliminations Company 
 
Assets
  
Cash and cash equivalents due from:  
Subsidiary banks $29,609 195   (29,804)   $28,021 176   (28,197)  
Nonaffiliates 17 219 91,233  91,469  9 161 72,380  72,550 
Securities available for sale 4,360 2,734 150,833  157,927  4,483 2,843 169,549  176,875 
Mortgages and loans held for sale   42,580  42,580    47,189  47,189 
Loans 7 32,498 747,311  (13,551) 766,265  7 31,276 734,248  (11,867) 753,664 
Loans to subsidiaries:  
Bank 3,885  3,500  (7,385)   3,885    (3,885)  
Nonbank 54,137    (54,137)   52,704    (52,704)  
Allowance for loan losses   (1,728)  (22,856)   (24,584)   (1,676)  (22,263)   (23,939)
 
Net loans 58,029 30,770 727,955  (75,073) 741,681  56,596 29,600 711,985  (68,456) 729,725 
 
Investments in subsidiaries:  
Bank 134,097    (134,097)   133,751    (133,751)  
Nonbank 13,675    (13,675)   14,461    (14,461)  
Other assets 8,490 1,291 184,520  (2,096) 192,205  8,794 1,321 186,133  (1,803) 194,445 
 
Total assets $248,277 35,209 1,197,121  (254,745) 1,225,862  $246,115 34,101 1,187,236  (246,668) 1,220,784 
 
Liabilities and equity
  
Deposits $  845,427  (29,804) 815,623  $  842,709  (28,197) 814,512 
Short-term borrowings 1,609 12,712 75,873  (45,007) 45,187  1,053 13,252 77,714  (41,304) 50,715 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities 7,762 1,668 51,248  (2,096) 58,582  7,177 1,617 60,258  (1,803) 67,249 
Long-term debt 108,661 19,268 76,736  (19,593) 185,072  102,936 17,520 58,548  (15,861) 163,143 
Indebtedness to subsidiaries 10,473    (10,473)   11,291    (11,291)  
 
Total liabilities 128,505 33,648 1,049,284  (106,973) 1,104,464  122,457 32,389 1,039,229  (98,456) 1,095,619 
 
Parent, WFFI, other and Wells Fargo stockholders’ equity 119,772 1,551 146,221  (147,772) 119,772 
Parent, WFFI, other and 
Wells Fargo stockholders’ equity 123,658 1,701 146,511  (148,212) 123,658 
Noncontrolling interests  10 1,616  1,626   11 1,496  1,507 
 
Total equity 119,772 1,561 147,837  (147,772) 121,398  123,658 1,712 148,007  (148,212) 125,165 
 
Total liabilities and equity $248,277 35,209 1,197,121  (254,745) 1,225,862  $246,115 34,101 1,187,236  (246,668) 1,220,784 
   
   

135137


Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
                                        
 
 December 31, 2009  December 31, 2009 
 Other    Other   
 consolidating Consolidated  consolidating Consolidated 
(in millions) Parent WFFI subsidiaries Eliminations Company  Parent WFFI subsidiaries Eliminations Company 
 
Assets
  
Cash and cash equivalents due from:  
Subsidiary banks $27,303 205   (27,508)   $27,303 205   (27,508)  
Nonaffiliates 11 249 67,705  67,965  11 249 67,705  67,965 
Securities available for sale 4,666 2,665 165,379  172,710  4,666 2,665 165,379  172,710 
Mortgages and loans held for sale   44,827  44,827    44,827  44,827 
Loans 7 35,199 750,045  (2,481) 782,770  7 35,199 750,045  (2,481) 782,770 
Loans to subsidiaries:  
Bank 6,760    (6,760)   6,760    (6,760)  
Nonbank 56,316    (56,316)   56,316    (56,316)  
Allowance for loan losses   (1,877)  (22,639)   (24,516)   (1,877)  (22,639)   (24,516)
 
Net loans 63,083 33,322 727,406  (65,557) 758,254  63,083 33,322 727,406  (65,557) 758,254 
 
Investments in subsidiaries:  
Bank 134,063    (134,063)   134,063    (134,063)  
Nonbank 12,816    (12,816)   12,816    (12,816)  
Other assets 10,758 1,500 189,049  (1,417) 199,890  10,758 1,500 189,049  (1,417) 199,890 
 
Total assets $252,700 37,941 1,194,366  (241,361) 1,243,646  $252,700 37,941 1,194,366  (241,361) 1,243,646 
 
Liabilities and equity
  
Deposits $  851,526  (27,508) 824,018  $  851,526  (27,508) 824,018 
Short-term borrowings 1,546 10,599 59,813  (32,992) 38,966  1,546 10,599 59,813  (32,992) 38,966 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities 7,878 1,439 54,542  (1,417) 62,442  7,878 1,439 54,542  (1,417) 62,442 
Long-term debt 119,353 24,437 80,499  (20,428) 203,861  119,353 24,437 80,499  (20,428) 203,861 
Indebtedness to subsidiaries 12,137    (12,137)   12,137    (12,137)  
 
Total liabilities 140,914 36,475 1,046,380  (94,482) 1,129,287  140,914 36,475 1,046,380  (94,482) 1,129,287 
 
Parent, WFFI, other and Wells Fargo stockholders’ equity 111,786 1,456 145,423  (146,879) 111,786 
Parent, WFFI, other and 
Wells Fargo stockholders’ equity 111,786 1,456 145,423  (146,879) 111,786 
Noncontrolling interests  10 2,563  2,573   10 2,563  2,573 
 
Total equity 111,786 1,466 147,986  (146,879) 114,359  111,786 1,466 147,986  (146,879) 114,359 
 
Total liabilities and equity $252,700 37,941 1,194,366  (241,361) 1,243,646  $252,700 37,941 1,194,366  (241,361) 1,243,646 
 
 

136138


Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
                                
 
 Six months ended June 30, 2010  Nine months ended September 30, 2010 
 Other    Other   
 consolidating    consolidating   
 subsidiaries/ Consolidated  subsidiaries/ Consolidated 
(in millions) Parent WFFI eliminations Company  Parent WFFI eliminations Company 
 
Cash flows from operating activities:
  
Net cash provided by operating activities $7,924 1,001 7,929 16,854  $12,841 1,245 8,714 22,800 
 
Cash flows from investing activities:
  
Securities available for sale:  
Sales proceeds 370 462 3,149 3,981  385 681 4,059 5,125 
Prepayments and maturities  108 22,633 22,741   166 33,183 33,349 
Purchases  (113)  (564)  (10,418)  (11,095)  (119)  (889)  (36,153)  (37,161)
Loans:  
Decrease in banking subsidiaries’ loan originations, net of collections  95 20,809 20,904 
Decrease (increase) in banking subsidiaries’ loan originations, net of collections   (48) 27,407 27,359 
Proceeds from sales (including participations) of loans originated for investment by banking subsidiaries   3,556 3,556    5,011 5,011 
Purchases (including participations) of loans by banking subsidiaries    (1,201)  (1,201)    (1,673)  (1,673)
Principal collected on nonbank entities’ loans  5,574 2,432 8,006   8,249 3,457 11,706 
Loans originated by nonbank entities   (3,071)  (2,238)  (5,309)   (4,590)  (3,370)  (7,960)
Net repayments from (advances to) subsidiaries  (2,004)  (621) 2,625    (2,424)  (693) 3,117  
Principal collected on notes/loans made to subsidiaries 7,046   (7,046)   8,899   (8,899)  
Net decrease (increase) in investment in subsidiaries 1,359   (1,359)   1,344   (1,344)  
Net cash paid for acquisitions    (11)  (11)    (23)  (23)
Other, net 2  (12)  (29,842)  (29,852) 13 13  (10,223)  (10,197)
 
Net cash provided by investing activities 6,660 1,971 3,089 11,720  8,098 2,889 14,549 25,536 
 
Cash flows from financing activities:
  
Net change in:  
Deposits    (8,395)  (8,395)    (9,506)  (9,506)
Short-term borrowings  (10) 2,114  (1,010) 1,094  211 2,827 3,584 6,622 
Long-term debt:  
Proceeds from issuance 1,577  588 2,165  1,665  973 2,638 
Repayment  (13,282)  (5,126)  (13,517)  (31,925)  (21,210)  (7,078)  (29,502)  (57,790)
Preferred stock:  
Cash dividends paid  (369)    (369)  (620)    (620)
Common stock:  
Proceeds from issuance 865   865  1,050   1,050 
Repurchased  (68)    (68)  (71)    (71)
Cash dividends paid  (520)    (520)  (783)    (783)
Common stock warrants repurchased  (540)    (540)  (544)    (544)
Excess tax benefits related to stock option payments 75   75  79   79 
Net change in noncontrolling interests    (465)  (465)    (490)  (490)
 
Net cash used by financing activities  (12,272)  (3,012)  (22,799)  (38,083)  (20,223)  (4,251)  (34,941)  (59,415)
 
Net change in cash and due from banks
 2,312  (40)  (11,781)  (9,509) 716  (117)  (11,678)  (11,079)
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period 27,314 454  (688) 27,080  27,314 454  (688) 27,080 
 
Cash and due from banks at end of period
 $29,626 414  (12,469) 17,571  $28,030 337  (12,366) 16,001 
   
   

137139


Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
                                
 
 Six months ended June 30, 2009  Nine months ended September 30, 2009 
 Other    Other   
 consolidating    consolidating   
 subsidiaries/ Consolidated  subsidiaries/ Consolidated 
(in millions) Parent WFFI eliminations Company  Parent WFFI eliminations Company 
 
Cash flows from operating activities:
  
Net cash provided by operating activities $721 801 16,327 17,849  $4,113 1,271 19,866 25,250 
 
Cash flows from investing activities:
  
Securities available for sale:  
Sales proceeds 562 363 17,946 18,871  655 679 45,003 46,337 
Prepayments and maturities  84 18,400 18,484   267 28,479 28,746 
Purchases  (308)  (597)  (80,018)  (80,923)  (346)  (1,422)  (87,627)  (89,395)
Loans:  
Decrease (increase) in banking subsidiaries’ loan originations, net of collections   (217) 28,687 28,470    (646) 44,983 44,337 
Proceeds from sales (including participations) of loans originated for investment by banking subsidiaries   3,179 3,179    4,569 4,569 
Purchases (including participations) of loans by banking subsidiaries    (1,563)  (1,563)    (2,007)  (2,007)
Principal collected on nonbank entities’ loans  4,853 1,618 6,471   7,815 2,409 10,224 
Loans originated by nonbank entities   (2,307)  (2,012)  (4,319)   (3,886)  (3,231)  (7,117)
Net repayments from (advances to) subsidiaries 10,246   (10,246)   14,988   (14,988)  
Capital notes and term loans made to subsidiaries  (64)  64    (80)  80  
Principal collected on notes/loans made to subsidiaries 5,202   (5,202)   7,179   (7,179)  
Net decrease (increase) in investment in subsidiaries  (5,011)  5,011    (5,209)  5,209  
Net cash paid for acquisitions    (132)  (132)    (132)  (132)
Other, net 22,460 151 13,333 35,944  22,486 147 16,959 39,592 
 
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities 33,087 2,330  (10,935) 24,482 
Net cash provided by investing activities 39,673 2,954 32,527 75,154 
 
Cash flows from financing activities:
  
Net change in:  
Deposits   32,192 32,192    15,212 15,212 
Short-term borrowings  (14,426) 1,781  (39,946)  (52,591)  (20,492) 2,740  (59,522)  (77,274)
Long-term debt:  
Proceeds from issuance 3,538  338 3,876  3,665  1,138 4,803 
Repayment  (11,500)  (5,000)  (18,662)  (35,162)  (20,158)  (7,002)  (28,172)  (55,332)
Preferred stock:  
Cash dividends paid  (1,053)    (1,053)  (1,616)    (1,616)
Common stock:  
Proceeds from issuance 9,308   9,308  9,590   9,590 
Repurchased  (63)    (63)  (80)    (80)
Cash dividends paid  (1,657)    (1,657)  (1,891)    (1,891)
Excess tax benefits related to stock option payments 3   3  9   9 
Net change in noncontrolling interests    (315)  (315)  1  (356)  (355)
Other, net  (34)  34    (35)  35  
 
Net cash used by financing activities  (15,884)  (3,219)  (26,359)  (45,462)  (31,008)  (4,261)  (71,665)  (106,934)
 
Net change in cash and due from banks
 17,924  (88)  (20,967)  (3,131) 12,778  (36)  (19,272)  (6,530)
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period 15,658 426 7,679 23,763  15,658 426 7,679 23,763 
 
Cash and due from banks at end of period
 $33,582 338  (13,288) 20,632  $28,436 390  (11,593) 17,233 
   
   

138140


18.18. REGULATORY AND AGENCY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
The Company and each of its subsidiary banks are subject to various regulatory capital adequacy requirements administered by the Federal Reserve Board (FRB) and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, respectively. Effective March 20, 2010, Wachovia Bank, N.A. merged with and into Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
We do not consolidate our wholly-owned trusts (the Trusts) formed solely to issue trust preferred securities. The amount of trust preferred securities and perpetual preferred purchase securities issued by the Trusts that was includable in Tier 1 capital in accordance with FRB risk-based capital guidelines was $19.3$19.2 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2010. The junior subordinated debentures held by the Trusts were included in the Company’s long-term debt.
                                               
 
 To be well capitalized  To be well capitalized 
 under the FDICIA  under the FDICIA 
 For capital prompt corrective  For capital prompt corrective 
 Actual adequacy purposes action provisions  Actual adequacy purposes action provisions 
(in billions) Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio  Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio 
 
As of June 30, 2010: 
As of September 30, 2010: 
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)  
Wells Fargo & Company $141.1  14.53% ³  $77.7 ³  8.00%  $144.1  14.88% ³$77.5 ³8.00% 
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 119.1 13.42 ³  71.0 ³  8.00 ³  $88.7 ³  10.00% 117.8 13.36 ³70.6 ³8.00 ³$88.2 ³10.00%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)  
Wells Fargo & Company 102.0 10.51 ³  38.8 ³  4.00  105.6 10.90 ³38.7 ³4.00 
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 90.9 10.24 ³  35.5 ³  4.00 ³  53.2 ³  6.00  89.8 10.18 ³35.3 ³4.00 ³52.9 ³6.00 
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)  
(Leverage ratio)  
Wells Fargo & Company 102.0 8.66 ³  47.1 ³  4.00(1)  105.6 9.01 ³46.9 ³4.00(1) 
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 90.9 8.81 ³  41.2 ³  4.00(1) ³  51.6 ³  5.00  89.8 8.71 ³41.3 ³4.00(1) ³51.6 ³5.00 
 
(1) The leverage ratio consists of Tier 1 capital divided by quarterly average total assets, excluding goodwill and certain other items. The minimum leverage ratio guideline is 3% for banking organizations that do not anticipate significant growth and that have well-diversified risk, excellent asset quality, high liquidity, good earnings, effective management and monitoring of market risk and, in general, are considered top-rated, strong banking organizations.
Certain subsidiaries of the Company are approved seller/servicers, and are therefore required to maintain minimum levels of shareholders’ equity, as specified by various agencies, including the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, GNMA, FHLMC and FNMA. At JuneSeptember 30, 2010, each seller/servicer met these requirements.
Certain broker-dealer subsidiaries of the Company are subject to SEC Rule 15c3-1 (the Net Capital Rule), which requires that we maintain minimum levels of net capital, as defined. At JuneSeptember 30, 2010, each of these subsidiaries met these requirements.

139141


GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS
   
ABCP Asset-based commercial paper
ALCO Asset/Liability Management Committee
AMTNAustralian medium-term note program
ARS Auction rate security
ASC Accounting Standards Codification
ASU Accounting Standards Update
ARM Adjustable-rate mortgage
AVM Automated valuation model
CDs Certificates of deposit
CDO Collateralized debt obligation
CLO Collateralized loan obligation
CPR Constant prepayment rate
CRE Commercial real estate
EMTNEuropean medium-term note program
ESOP Employee Stock Ownership Plan
FAS Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
FASB Financial Accounting Standards Board
FDIC Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
FHA Federal Housing Administration
FHLB Federal Home Loan Bank
FHLMC Federal Home Loan Mortgage Company
FICO Fair Isaac Corporation (credit rating)
FNMA Federal National Mortgage Association
FRB Federal Reserve Board
GAAP Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
GNMA Government National Mortgage Association
GSE Government-sponsored entity
HAMP Home Affordability Modification Program
IRA Individual Retirement Account
LHFS Loans held for sale
LIBOR London Interbank Offered Rate
LTV Loan-to-value
MBS Mortgage-backed security
MHFS Mortgages held for sale
MSR Mortgage servicing right
MTN Medium-term note program
NAV Net asset value
NPA Nonperforming asset
OCC Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
OCI Other comprehensive income
OTC Over-the-counter
OTTI Other-than-temporary impairment
PCI Loans Purchased credit-impaired loans are acquired loans with evidence of credit deterioration accounted for under FASB ASC 310-30 (AICPA Statement of Position 03-3)
PTPP Pre-tax pre-provision profit
QSPE Qualifying special purpose entity
RBC Risk-based capital
ROA Wells Fargo net income to average total assets

140


GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS (continued from previous page)
ROE Wells Fargo net income applicable to common stock to average Wells Fargo common stockholders’ equity
SEC Securities and Exchange Commission
S&P Standard & Poors

142


GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS (continued from previous page)
SPE Special purpose entity
TDR Troubled debt restructuring
VA Department of Veterans Affairs
VaR Value-at-risk
VIE Variable interest entity
WFFCC Wells Fargo Financial Canada Corporation

141143


PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.    Legal Proceedings
Item 1.Legal Proceedings
Information in response to this item can be found in Note 10 (Guarantees and Legal Actions) to Financial Statements in this Report which information is incorporated by reference into this item.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Information in response to this item can be found under the “Financial Review –
Item 1A.Risk Factors
Information in response to this item can be found under the “Financial Review — Risk Factors” section in this Report which information is incorporated by reference into this item.
Item 2.   
Item 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following table shows Company repurchases of its common stock for each calendar month in the quarter ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010.
             
 
          Maximum number of 
  Total number      shares that may yet 
  of shares  Weighted-average  be repurchased under 
Calendar month repurchased (1)    price paid per share  the authorizations 
 
April  776,794   $32.66   3,992,919 
May  88,602   32.36   3,904,317 
June  27,777   27.93   3,876,540 
         
Total  893,173         
         
 
             
 
          Maximum number of 
  Total number      shares that may yet 
  of shares  Weighted-average  be repurchased under 
Calendar month repurchased (1)  price paid per share  the authorizations 
  
July  42,987  $27.26   3,833,553 
August  34,669   25.97   3,798,884 
September  38,096   25.81   3,760,788 
          
Total  115,752         
          
  
(1) All shares were repurchased under the authorization covering up to 25 million shares of common stock approved by the Board of Directors and publicly announced by the Company on September 23, 2008. Unless modified or revoked by the Board, this authorization does not expire.
On May 26, 2010,The following table shows Company repurchases of the Company purchased 70,165,963 warrants to purchase shares of its common stock at a price of $7.70 per warrant. The warrants were originally issued to the U.S. Treasury in connection with its investmentfor each calendar month in the Company under the Troubled Asset Relief Program Capital Purchase Program. The Board of Directors authorized the purchase of up to $1 billion of the warrants. As of Junequarter ended September 30, 2010, $459,722,085 of that authority remained.2010.
             
 
  Total number      Maximum dollar value 
  of warrants  Average price  of warrants 
Calendar month purchased (1)  paid per warrant  that may yet be purchased 
  
July  25,000  $7.65  $459,530,935 
August  386,425   7.61   456,591,097 
September  125,371   7.88   455,602,966 
          
Total  536,796         
          
  
(1)All warrants were purchased under the authorization covering up to $1 billion in warrants approved by the Board of Directors (ratified and approved on June 22, 2010). Unless modified or revoked by the Board, authorization does not expire.

142144


Item 6.
Item 6.Exhibits
A list of exhibits to this Form 10-Q is set forth on the Exhibit Index immediately preceding such exhibits and is incorporated herein by reference.
The Company’s SEC file number is 001-2979. On and before November 2, 1998, the Company filed documents with the SEC under the name Norwest Corporation. The former Wells Fargo & Company filed documents under SEC file number 001-6214.
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
     
Dated: August 6,November 5, 2010 WELLS FARGO & COMPANY
 
 
 By:  /s/ RICHARD D. LEVY   
  Richard D. Levy  
  Executive Vice President and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)  

143145


EXHIBIT INDEX
                        
            
Exhibit        
Number Description Location Description Location
                        
3(a) Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended and in effect on the date hereof. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(a) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010. Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended and in effect on the date hereof. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(a) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010.
                        
3(b) By-Laws. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(b) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010. By-Laws. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(b) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010.
                        
4(a) See Exhibits 3(a) and 3(b).   See Exhibits 3(a) and 3(b).  
                        
4(b) The Company agrees to furnish upon request to the Commission a copy of each instrument defining the rights of holders of senior and subordinated debt of the Company.   The Company agrees to furnish upon request to the Commission a copy of each instrument defining the rights of holders of senior and subordinated debt of the Company.  
                        
10(a) Form of Performance Share Award Agreement for grants to John G. Stumpf, Howard I. Atkins, David M. Carroll, David A. Hoyt and Mark C. Oman on June 22, 2010. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 25, 2010.
                    
10(b) Wells Fargo Bonus Plan, as amended effective January 1, 2010. Filed herewith.
                    
12(a) Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges: Filed herewith. Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges: Filed herewith.
                    
   Quarter ended Six months      
   June 30, ended June 30,     Quarter ended  Nine months   
           Sept. 30, ended Sept. 30,  
    2010   2009   2010   2009           
       2010 2009 2010 2009  
                        
 Including interest on deposits  3.15   2.74   2.97   2.61    Including interest on deposits 3.39 2.90 3.11 2.70  
                        
 Excluding interest on deposits  4.23   3.72   3.96   3.45    Excluding interest on deposits 4.61 4.05 4.17 3.62  
        
                        
12(b) Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends: Filed herewith. Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends: Filed herewith.
                        
   Quarter ended Six months     Quarter ended  Nine months   
   June 30, ended June 30,     Sept. 30, ended Sept. 30,  
                
    2010   2009   2010   2009      2010 2009 2010 2009  
        
                     Including interest on deposits 2.98 2.15 2.75 2.03  
 Including interest on deposits  2.79   2.06   2.64   1.97       
                     Excluding interest on deposits 3.83 2.59 3.49 2.39  
 Excluding interest on deposits  3.54   2.46   3.33   2.30       
        
                    
31(a) Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith. Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith.
                        
31(b) Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith. Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith.
                        
32(a) Certification of Periodic Financial Report by Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and 18 U.S.C. § 1350. Furnished herewith. Certification of Periodic Financial Report by Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and 18 U.S.C. § 1350. Furnished herewith.
                        
32(b) Certification of Periodic Financial Report by Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and 18 U.S.C. § 1350. Furnished herewith. Certification of Periodic Financial Report by Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and 18 U.S.C. § 1350. Furnished herewith.
                    

144146


                         
Exhibit     
Number Description Location
                    
101*101* Pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T, the following financial information from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010, is formatted in XBRL interactive data files: (i) Consolidated Statement of Income for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 and 2009; (ii) Consolidated Balance Sheet at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009; (iii) Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity and Comprehensive Income for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 and 2009; (iv) Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 and 2009; and (v) Notes to Financial Statements. Furnished herewith.
 
*
*As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information is furnished and not filed for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

145147