UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
   
þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended SEPTEMBER 30, 2010MARCH 31, 2011
OR
   
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ________________ to ________________
Commission File Number: 0-24920
ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
   
Illinois 36-3894853
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
   
Two North Riverside Plaza, Chicago, Illinois
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
 60606
(Zip Code)
(312) 474-1300
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesþ Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yeso Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
       
Large accelerated filero Accelerated filero Non-accelerated filerþ Smaller reporting companyo
  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yeso Noþ
 
 

 


 

ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
TABLE OF CONTENTS
   
  PAGE
  
   
 2
   
 3 to 4
   
 5 to 7
   
 8 to 9
   
 10 to 2827
   
 2928 to 4844
   
 4844
   
 48 to 4944
   
  
   
 5045
   
 50
5045
   
 5045
 EX-31.1
 EX-31.2
 EX-32.1
 EX-32.2

 


ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in thousands)
(Unaudited)
                
 September 30, December 31,  March 31, December 31, 
 2010 2009  2011 2010 
ASSETS
  
Investment in real estate  
Land $4,093,508 $3,650,324  $4,107,769 $4,110,275 
Depreciable property 15,161,007 13,893,521  15,279,033 15,226,512 
Projects under development 499,037 668,979  97,151 130,337 
Land held for development 290,819 252,320  211,968 235,247 
          
Investment in real estate 20,044,371 18,465,144  19,695,921 19,702,371 
Accumulated depreciation  (4,313,502)  (3,877,564)  (4,424,078)  (4,337,357)
          
Investment in real estate, net 15,730,869 14,587,580  15,271,843 15,365,014 
  
Cash and cash equivalents 43,660 193,288  306,072 431,408 
Investments in unconsolidated entities  6,995  3,533 3,167 
Deposits — restricted 109,608 352,008  309,605 180,987 
Escrow deposits — mortgage 19,632 17,292  12,087 12,593 
Deferred financing costs, net 44,488 46,396  39,182 42,033 
Other assets 138,572 213,956  133,007 148,992 
          
Total assets
 $16,086,829 $15,417,515  $16,075,329 $16,184,194 
          
  
LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL
  
Liabilities:  
Mortgage notes payable $4,845,244 $4,783,446  $4,583,545 $4,762,896 
Notes, net 5,185,283 4,609,124  5,092,967 5,185,180 
Lines of credit 146,000     
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 111,121 58,537  80,385 39,452 
Accrued interest payable 71,374 101,849  71,972 98,631 
Other liabilities 341,209 272,236  260,873 304,202 
Security deposits 62,549 59,264  60,784 60,812 
Distributions payable 102,653 100,266  106,020 140,905 
          
Total liabilities
 10,865,433 9,984,722  10,256,546 10,592,078 
          
  
Commitments and contingencies
  
  
Redeemable Limited Partners
 357,702 258,280  416,334 383,540 
          
  
Capital:  
Partners’ Capital:  
Preference Units 208,653 208,773  200,000 200,000 
General Partner 4,656,434 4,833,885  5,129,472 4,948,004 
Limited Partners 106,531 116,120  115,924 110,399 
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income  (116,464) 4,681 
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)  (50,634)  (57,818)
          
Total partners’ capital 4,855,154 5,163,459  5,394,762 5,200,585 
Noncontrolling Interests — Partially Owned Properties 8,540 11,054  7,687 7,991 
          
Total capital
 4,863,694 5,174,513  5,402,449 5,208,576 
          
Total liabilities and capital
 $16,086,829 $15,417,515  $16,075,329 $16,184,194 
          
See accompanying notes

2


ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Amounts in thousands except per Unit data)
(Unaudited)
                
 Nine Months Ended Quarter Ended         
 September 30, September 30,  Quarter Ended March 31, 
 2010 2009 2010 2009  2011 2010 
REVENUES
  
Rental income $1,517,302 $1,433,865 $525,228 $477,588  $518,817 $462,577 
Fee and asset management 7,596 7,928 2,128 2,653  1,806 2,422 
              
Total revenues 1,524,898 1,441,793 527,356 480,241  520,623 464,999 
              
  
EXPENSES
  
Property and maintenance 386,518 363,354 135,000 122,305  128,357 120,203 
Real estate taxes and insurance 175,491 158,306 61,189 54,579  56,024 55,575 
Property management 60,548 56,457 19,401 18,725  22,381 20,492 
Fee and asset management 4,364 5,916 704 1,931  948 1,958 
Depreciation 500,173 428,751 173,642 144,165  167,968 146,042 
General and administrative 31,035 30,476 10,224 9,881  11,435 10,721 
Impairment  11,124   
              
Total expenses 1,158,129 1,054,384 400,160 351,586  387,113 354,991 
              
  
Operating income 366,769 387,409 127,196 128,655  133,510 110,008 
  
Interest and other income 5,325 15,850 208 3,214  972 2,220 
Other expenses  (9,513)  (2,228)  (3,487)  (1,922)  (2,164)  (4,383)
Interest:  
Expense incurred, net  (353,652)  (360,021)  (122,854)  (121,166)  (121,376)  (114,111)
Amortization of deferred financing costs  (7,970)  (9,311)  (2,457)  (3,101)  (3,023)  (2,996)
              
  
Income (loss) before income and other taxes, (loss) income from investments in unconsolidated entities, net gain (loss) on sales of unconsolidated entities and land parcels and discontinued operations 959 31,699  (1,394) 5,680 
Income (loss) before income and other taxes, (loss) from investments in unconsolidated entities, net gain on sales of unconsolidated entities and discontinued operations 7,919  (9,262)
Income and other tax (expense) benefit  (311)  (2,844)  (293)  (459)  (192)  (159)
(Loss) income from investments in unconsolidated entities  (735)  (2,372) 188  (151)
(Loss) from investments in unconsolidated entities   (464)
Net gain on sales of unconsolidated entities 28,101 6,718 22,544 3,959   478 
Net (loss) on sales of land parcels  (1,161)   (1,161)  
              
Income from continuing operations 26,853 33,201 19,884 9,029 
Income (loss) from continuing operations 7,727  (9,407)
Discontinued operations, net 70,918 301,517 9,942 134,336  125,339 67,263 
              
Net income 97,771 334,718 29,826 143,365  133,066 57,856 
Net loss attributable to Noncontrolling Interests — Partially Owned Properties 623 391 188 317  40 250 
              
Net income attributable to controlling interests $98,394 $335,109 $30,014 $143,682  $133,106 $58,106 
              
  
ALLOCATION OF NET INCOME:
  
Preference Units $10,855 $10,859 $3,617 $3,619  $3,466 $3,620 
              
Preference Interests and Junior Preference Units $ $9 $ $2 
         
  
General Partner $83,372 $306,122 $25,166 $132,362  $123,865 $51,863 
Limited Partners 4,167 18,119 1,231 7,699  5,775 2,623 
              
Net income available to Units $87,539 $324,241 $26,397 $140,061  $129,640 $54,486 
              
  
Earnings per Unit — basic:
  
Income from continuing operations available to Units $0.06 $0.08 $0.06 $0.02 
Income (loss) from continuing operations available to Units $0.01 $(0.04)
              
Net income available to Units $0.30 $1.12 $0.09 $0.48  $0.42 $0.18 
              
Weighted average Units outstanding 295,572 288,990 296,348 289,262  306,248 294,450 
              
  
Earnings per Unit — diluted:
  
Income from continuing operations available to Units $0.06 $0.08 $0.05 $0.02 
Income (loss) from continuing operations available to Units $0.01 $(0.04)
              
Net income available to Units $0.29 $1.12 $0.09 $0.48  $0.42 $0.18 
              
Weighted average Units outstanding 299,031 289,518 300,379 290,215  310,467 294,450 
              
  
Distributions declared per Unit outstanding $1.0125 $1.3025 $0.3375 $0.3375  $0.3375 $0.3375 
              
See accompanying notes

3


ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
(Amounts in thousands except per Unit data)
(Unaudited)
                 
  Nine Months Ended  Quarter Ended 
  September 30,  September 30, 
  2010  2009  2010  2009 
Comprehensive (loss) income:                
                 
Net income $97,771  $334,718  $29,826  $143,365 
Other comprehensive (loss) income — derivative instruments:                
Unrealized holding (losses) gains arising during the period  (123,472)  12,193   (37,726)  (462)
Losses reclassified into earnings from other comprehensive income  2,379   3,014   914   709 
Other     449       
Other comprehensive (loss) income — other instruments:                
Unrealized holding (losses) gains arising during the period  (52)  3,450   14   339 
(Gains) realized during the period     (4,943)      
             
Comprehensive (loss) income  (23,374)  348,881   (6,972)  143,951 
Comprehensive loss attributable to Noncontrolling Interests — Partially Owned Properties  623   391   188   317 
             
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to controlling interests $(22,751) $349,272  $(6,784) $144,268 
             
         
  Quarter Ended March 31, 
  2011  2010 
Comprehensive income:        
         
Net income $133,066  $57,856 
Other comprehensive income (loss) — derivative instruments:        
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period  6,082   (13,503)
Losses reclassified into earnings from other comprehensive income  956   726 
Other comprehensive income (loss) — other instruments:        
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period  146   (159)
       
Comprehensive income  140,250   44,920 
Comprehensive loss attributable to Noncontrolling Interests — Partially Owned Properties  40   250 
       
Comprehensive income attributable to controlling interests $140,290  $45,170 
       
See accompanying notes

4


ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in thousands)
(Unaudited)
        
 Nine Months Ended         
 September 30,  Quarter Ended March 31, 
 2010 2009  2011 2010 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
  
Net income $97,771 $334,718  $133,066 $57,856 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
  
Depreciation 501,695 451,487  169,363 152,734 
Amortization of deferred financing costs 7,981 9,646  3,074 3,197 
Amortization of discounts on investment securities   (1,661)
Amortization of discounts and premiums on debt 1,454 3,346  373 565 
Amortization of deferred settlements on derivative instruments 1,978 2,003  822 593 
Impairment  11,124 
Write-off of pursuit costs 3,512 1,973  1,683 1,046 
Property acquisition costs 6,001 255 
Loss from investments in unconsolidated entities 735 2,372   464 
Distributions from unconsolidated entities — return on capital 61 129  41 61 
Net (gain) on sales of investment securities   (4,943)
Net (gain) on sales of unconsolidated entities  (28,101)  (6,718)   (478)
Net loss on sales of land parcels 1,161  
Net (gain) on sales of discontinued operations  (69,538)  (274,933)  (123,754)  (60,036)
Loss (gain) on debt extinguishments 158  (4,420)
Unrealized loss (gain) on derivative instruments 1  (2)
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments  1 
Compensation paid with Company Common Shares 14,716 13,975  6,524 5,757 
  
Changes in assets and liabilities:
  
Decrease in deposits — restricted 75 4,890 
(Increase) decrease in other assets  (6,385) 4,353 
Decrease (increase) in deposits — restricted 1,557  (1,000)
Decrease in other assets 5,771 1,798 
Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses 66,070 35,555  44,531 39,148 
(Decrease) in accrued interest payable  (31,257)  (40,876)  (26,659)  (32,954)
(Decrease) in other liabilities  (4,150)  (6,167)  (28,836)  (20,005)
Increase (decrease) in security deposits 2,744  (3,838)
(Decrease) increase in security deposits  (28) 3,373 
          
Net cash provided by operating activities 566,682 532,268  187,528 152,120 
          
  
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
  
Investment in real estate — acquisitions  (1,108,014)  (18,500)  (123,868)  (498,272)
Investment in real estate — development/other  (98,282)  (268,213)  (29,840)  (31,347)
Improvements to real estate  (98,959)  (93,049)  (29,891)  (25,691)
Additions to non-real estate property  (1,022)  (1,315)  (2,677)  (353)
Interest capitalized for real estate under development  (10,196)  (28,704)
Interest capitalized for real estate and unconsolidated entities under development  (1,700)  (4,365)
Proceeds from disposition of real estate, net 134,603 729,153  258,212 105,071 
Investments in unconsolidated entities  (366)  
Distributions from unconsolidated entities — return of capital 26,924 5,396   1,303 
Purchase of investment securities   (52,822)
Proceeds from sale of investment securities 25,000 215,753 
Property acquisition costs  (6,001)  (255)
Decrease (increase) in deposits on real estate acquisitions, net 248,547  (246,835)
(Increase) decrease in mortgage deposits  (2,340) 775 
Consolidation of previously unconsolidated properties  (26,854)  
(Increase) decrease in deposits on real estate acquisitions, net  (107,878) 182,203 
Decrease (increase) in mortgage deposits ��506  (3,383)
Acquisition of Noncontrolling Interests — Partially Owned Properties  (1,936)  (11,480)  (504)  
          
Net cash (used for) provided by investing activities  (918,530) 229,904 
Net cash (used for) investing activities  (38,006)  (274,834)
          
See accompanying notes

5


ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
(Amounts in thousands)
(Unaudited)(Unaudited
                
 Nine Months Ended September 30,  Quarter Ended March 31, 
 2010 2009  2011 2010 
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
  
Loan and bond acquisition costs $(7,897) $(9,203) $(223) $(1,435)
Mortgage notes payable:
  
Proceeds 124,020 657,785  707 55,664 
Restricted cash 36,411 34,655   (22,297) 7,427 
Lump sum payoffs  (491,100)  (774,481)  (200,733)  (149,409)
Scheduled principal repayments  (12,508)  (13,701)  (4,223)  (4,059)
(Loss) gain on debt extinguishments  (158) 2,400 
Notes, net:
  
Proceeds 595,422  
Lump sum payoffs   (505,849)  (93,096)  
Gain on debt extinguishments  2,020 
Lines of credit:
  
Proceeds 4,375,125    1,469,125 
Repayments  (4,229,125)     (1,378,125)
(Payments on) proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments  (10,040) 11,253 
Proceeds from sale of OP Units 73,356   154,508 73,356 
Proceeds from EQR’s Employee Share Purchase Plan (ESPP) 4,251 4,698  2,742 2,478 
Proceeds from exercise of EQR options 57,933 7,420  32,719 19,215 
OP Units repurchased and retired  (1,887)  (1,124)   (1,887)
Payment of offering costs  (730)  (463)  (2,352)  (604)
Other financing activities, net  (33)  (8)
Contributions — Noncontrolling Interests — Partially Owned Properties 222 893   222 
Contributions — Limited Partners  78 
Distributions:
  
OP Units — General Partner  (284,185)  (395,786)  (132,655)  (93,317)
Preference Units  (10,858)  (10,859)  (3,466)  (3,620)
Preference Interests and Junior Preference Units   (11)
OP Units — Limited Partners  (14,187)  (23,736)  (6,225)  (4,794)
Noncontrolling Interests — Partially Owned Properties  (1,812)  (1,359)  (264)  (625)
          
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities 202,220  (1,015,378)
Net cash (used for) financing activities  (274,858)  (10,388)
          
Net (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  (149,628)  (253,206)  (125,336)  (133,102)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 193,288 890,794  431,408 193,288 
          
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $43,660 $637,588  $306,072 $60,186 
          
See accompanying notes

6


ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
(Amounts in thousands)
(Unaudited)
                
 Nine Months Ended September 30,  Quarter Ended March 31, 
 2010 2009  2011 2010 
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
  
Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized $377,467 $396,922  $146,514 $144,902 
          
  
Net cash (received) paid for income and other taxes $(2,892) $4,047 
Net cash paid (received) for income and other taxes $341 $(1,850)
          
  
Real estate acquisitions/dispositions/other:
  
Mortgage loans assumed $338,196 $  $26,900 $145,660 
          
Valuation of OP Units $7,433 $1,034 
 
Valuation of OP Units issued $ $7,383 
     
      
Mortgage loans (assumed) by purchaser $(39,999) $(4,387) $ $(39,999)
          
  
Amortization of deferred financing costs:
  
Investment in real estate, net $(1,824) $(2,936) $ $(600)
          
 
Deferred financing costs, net $9,805 $12,582  $3,074 $3,797 
          
  
Amortization of discounts and premiums on debt:
  
Investment in real estate, net $ $(3)
Mortgage notes payable $(1,858) $(1,563)
          
Mortgage notes payable $(5,048) $(4,631)
      
Notes, net $6,502 $7,980  $2,231 $2,128 
          
  
Amortization of deferred settlements on derivative instruments:
  
Other liabilities $(401) $(1,011) $(134) $(133)
          
Accumulated other comprehensive loss $2,379 $3,014 
 
Accumulated other comprehensive income $956 $726 
          
  
Unrealized loss (gain) on derivative instruments:
 
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments:
 
Other assets $13,788 $(9,910) $810 $7,579 
     
      
Mortgage notes payable $6 $(1,755) $(144) $16 
          
 
Notes, net $9,835 $866  $(1,348) $2,725 
          
Other liabilities $99,844 $(1,396)
     
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income $(123,472) $12,193 
     
 
(Payments on) proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments:
 
Other assets $ $11,253 
      
Other liabilities $(10,040) $  $(5,400) $3,184 
          
  
Consolidation of previously unconsolidated properties:
 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) $6,082 $(13,503)
     
 
Interest capitalized for real estate and unconsolidated entities under development
 
Investment in real estate, net $(105,065) $  $(1,659) $(4,365)
          
 
Investments in unconsolidated entities $7,376 $  $(41) $ 
     
Deposits — restricted $(42,633) $ 
     
Mortgage notes payable $112,631 $ 
     
Net other assets recorded $837 $ 
          
  
Other
  
Receivable on sale of OP Units $37,550 $  $ $37,550 
          
 
Transfer from notes, net to mortgage notes payable $35,600 $  $ $35,600 
          
See accompanying notes

7


ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN CAPITAL
(Amounts in thousands)
(Unaudited)
        
 Nine Months Ended  Quarter Ended 
 September 30, 2010  March 31, 2011 
PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
  
 
PREFERENCE UNITS
  
Balance, beginning of year $208,773  $200,000 
Conversion of 7.00% Series E Cumulative Convertible  (120)
      
Balance, end of period $208,653  $200,000 
      
  
GENERAL PARTNER
  
Balance, beginning of year $4,833,885  $4,948,004 
OP Unit Issuance:  
Conversion of Preference Units into OP Units held by General Partner 120 
Conversion of OP Units held by Limited Partners into OP Units held by General Partner 13,278  737 
Issuance of OP Units 35,806  154,508 
Exercise of EQR share options 57,933  32,719 
EQR’s Employee Share Purchase Plan (ESPP) 4,251  2,742 
Conversion of EQR restricted shares to LTIP Units  (3,934)
Share-based employee compensation expense:  
EQR restricted shares 7,348  2,711 
EQR share options 5,807  2,751 
EQR ESPP discount 1,122  689 
OP Units repurchased and retired  (1,887)
Offering costs  (730)  (2,352)
Net income available to Units — General Partner 83,372  123,865 
OP Units — General Partner distributions  (286,687)  (99,354)
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) 7,657   (108)
Acquisition of Noncontrolling Interests — Partially Owned Properties  (1,313)  (504)
Change in market value of Redeemable Limited Partners  (108,576)  (29,294)
Adjustment for Limited Partners ownership in Operating Partnership 5,048   (3,708)
      
Balance, end of period $4,656,434  $5,129,472 
      
  
LIMITED PARTNERS
  
Balance, beginning of year $116,120  $110,399 
Issuance of OP Units 7,433 
Conversion of OP Units held by Limited Partners into OP Units held by General Partner  (13,278)  (737)
Conversion of EQR restricted shares to LTIP Units 3,934 
Equity compensation associated with Units — Limited Partners 2,058  986 
Net income available to Units — Limited Partners 4,167  5,775 
Units — Limited Partners distributions  (14,075)  (4,641)
Change in carrying value of Redeemable Limited Partners 9,154   (3,500)
Adjustment for Limited Partners ownership in Operating Partnership  (5,048) 3,708 
      
Balance, end of period $106,531  $115,924 
      
 
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS)
 
Balance, beginning of year $(57,818)
Accumulated other comprehensive income — derivative instruments: 
Unrealized holding gains arising during the period 6,082 
Losses reclassified into earnings from other comprehensive income 956 
Accumulated other comprehensive income — other instruments: 
Unrealized holding gains arising during the period 146 
   
Balance, end of period $(50,634)
   
See accompanying notes

8


ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN CAPITAL (Continued)
(Amounts in thousands)
(Unaudited)
     
  Nine Months Ended 
  September 30, 2010 
PARTNERS’ CAPITAL (Continued)
    
     
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME
    
Balance, beginning of year $4,681 
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) — derivative instruments:    
Unrealized holding (losses) arising during the period  (123,472)
Losses reclassified into earnings from other comprehensive income  2,379 
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) — other instruments:    
Unrealized holding (losses) arising during the period  (52)
    
Balance, end of period $(116,464)
    
     
NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS
    
     
NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS — PARTIALLY OWNED PROPERTIES
    
Balance, beginning of year $11,054 
Net (loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests  (623)
Contributions by Noncontrolling Interests  222 
Distributions to Noncontrolling Interests  (1,831)
Acquisition of Noncontrolling Interests — Partially Owned Properties  (500)
Other  218 
    
Balance, end of period $8,540 
    
     
  Quarter Ended 
  March 31, 2011 
NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS
    
     
NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS — PARTIALLY OWNED PROPERTIES
    
Balance, beginning of year $7,991 
Net (loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests  (40)
Distributions to Noncontrolling Interests  (264)
    
Balance, end of period $7,687 
    
See accompanying notes

9


ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. Business
1.Business
     ERP Operating Limited Partnership (“ERPOP”), an Illinois limited partnership, was formed in May 1993 to conduct the multifamily residential property business of Equity Residential (“EQR”). EQR, a Maryland real estate investment trust (“REIT”) formed in March 1993, is an S&P 500 company focused on the acquisition, development and management of high quality apartment properties in top United States growth markets. EQR has elected to be taxed as a REIT.
     EQR is the general partner of, and as of September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 owned an approximate 95.3%95.5% ownership interest in ERPOP. EQR is structured as an umbrella partnership REIT (“UPREIT”) under which allAll of EQR’s property ownership, development and related business operations are conducted through ERPOP and its subsidiaries. References to the “Operating Partnership” include ERPOP and those entities owned or controlled by it. References to the “Company” mean EQR and the Operating Partnership.
     As of September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, the Operating Partnership, directly or indirectly through investments in title holding entities, owned all or a portion of 471442 properties located in 1817 states and the District of Columbia consisting of 133,029127,711 apartment units. The ownership breakdown includes (table does not include various uncompleted development properties):
                
 Properties Units  Properties Apartment Units 
Wholly Owned Properties 445 123,327  417 118,078 
Partially Owned Properties – Consolidated 24 5,022 
Partially Owned Properties — Consolidated 23 4,828 
Military Housing 2 4,680  2 4,805 
          
 471 133,029  442 127,711 
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
   Basis of Presentation
     The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) and certain reclassifications considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period financial statements in order to conform to the current year presentation. Operating results for the nine monthsquarter ended September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2010.2011.
     In preparation of the Operating Partnership’s financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, management makes estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
     The balance sheet at December 31, 20092010 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements.
For further information, including definitions of capitalized terms not defined herein, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Operating Partnership’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.2010.
   Income and Other Taxes
     The Operating Partnership generally is not liable for federal income taxes as the partners recognize their proportionate share of the Operating Partnership’s income or loss in their tax returns; therefore no provision for federal income taxes has been made at the ERPOP level. Historically, the Operating Partnership has generally only incurred certain state and local income, excise and franchise taxes. The Operating Partnership has elected Taxable REIT Subsidiary (“TRS”) status for certain of its corporate subsidiaries, primarily those entities engaged in condominium

10


conversion and corporate housing activities and as a result, these entities will incur both federal and state income taxes on any taxable income of such

10


entities after consideration of any net operating losses.
     Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. These assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates for which the temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effects of changes in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized in earnings in the period enacted. The Operating Partnership’s deferred tax assets are generally the result of tax affected amortization of goodwill, differing depreciable lives on capitalized assets and the timing of expense recognition for certain accrued liabilities. As of September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, the Operating Partnership has recorded a deferred tax asset of approximately $42.5$38.7 million, which is fully offset by a valuation allowance due to the uncertainty in forecasting future TRS taxable income.
     Other
          In June 2009, the FASB issuedThe FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, which superseded all then-existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards and became the source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by non-governmental entities. The Operating Partnership adopted the codification as required, effective for the quarter ended September 30, 2009. The adoption of the codification has no impact on the Operating Partnership’s consolidated results of operations or financial position but changed the way we refer to accounting literature in our reports.
     Effective January 1, 2010, in an effort to improve financial standards for transfers of financial assets, more stringent conditions for reporting a transfer of a portion of a financial asset as a sale (e.g. loan participations) are required, the concept of a “qualifying special-purpose entity” and special guidance for guaranteed mortgage securitizations are eliminated, other sale-accounting criteria is clarified and the initial measurement of a transferor’s interest in transferred financial assets is changed. This does not have a material effect on the Operating Partnership’s consolidated results of operations or financial position.
     Effective January 1, 2010, the analysis for identifying the primary beneficiary of a Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”) has been simplified by replacing the previous quantitative-based analysis with a framework that is based more on qualitative judgments. The analysis requires the primary beneficiary of a VIE to be identified as the party that both (a) has the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact its economic performance and (b) has an obligation to absorb losses or a right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE. For the Operating Partnership, this includes only its consolidated development partnerships as the Operating Partnership provides substantially all of the capital for these ventures (other than third party mortgage debt, if any). For the Operating Partnership, these requirements affected only disclosures and had no impact on the Operating Partnership’s consolidated results of operations or financial position. See Note 6 for further discussion.
     The Operating Partnership is required to make certain disclosures regarding noncontrolling interests in consolidated limited-life subsidiaries. The Operating Partnership is the controlling partner in various consolidated partnerships owning 2423 properties and 5,0224,828 apartment units and various completed and uncompleted development properties having a noncontrolling interest book value of $8.5$7.7 million at September 30, 2010.March 31, 2011. Some of these partnership agreements contain provisions that require the partnerships to be liquidated through the sale of their assets upon reaching a date specified in each respective partnership agreement. The Operating Partnership, as controlling partner, has an obligation to cause the property owning partnerships to distribute the proceeds of liquidation to the Noncontrolling Interests in these Partially Owned Properties only to the extent that the net proceeds received by the partnerships from the sale of their assets warrant a distribution based on the partnership agreements. As of September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, the Operating Partnership estimates the value of Noncontrolling Interest distributions would have been approximately $62.2$64.1 million (“Settlement Value”) had the partnerships been liquidated. This Settlement Value is based on estimated third party consideration realized by the partnerships upon disposition of the Partially Owned Properties and is net of all other assets and liabilities, including yield maintenance on the mortgages encumbering the properties, that would have been due on September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 had those mortgages been prepaid. Due to, among other things, the inherent uncertainty in the sale of real estate assets, the amount of any potential distribution to the Noncontrolling Interests in the Operating Partnership’s Partially Owned Properties is subject to change. To the extent that the partnerships’ underlying assets are worth less than the underlying liabilities, the Operating Partnership has no obligation to remit any consideration to the Noncontrolling Interests in these Partially Owned Properties.
     Effective January 1, 2010, companies are required to separately disclose the amounts of significant transfers of assets and liabilities into and out of Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy and the reasons for those transfers. Companies must also develop and disclose their policy for determining when transfers between levels are

11


recognized. In addition, companies are required to provide fair value disclosures for each class rather than each major category of assets and liabilities. For fair value measurements using significant other observable inputs (Level 2) or significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), companies are required to disclose the valuation technique and the inputs used in determining fair value for each class of assets and liabilities. This does not have a material effect on the Operating Partnership’s consolidated results of operations or financial position. See Note 11 for further discussion.
     Effective January 1, 2011, companies will beare required to separately disclose purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis in the reconciliation of recurring Level 3 fair value measurements. The Operating PartnershipThis does not expect this will have a

11


material effect on itsthe Operating Partnership’s consolidated results of operations or financial position. See Note 11 for further discussion.
     Effective January 1, 2009, issuers of certain convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash on conversion were required to separately account for the liability and equity components of the instrument in a manner that reflects each issuer’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. As the Operating Partnership is required to apply this retrospectively, the accounting for the Operating Partnership’s $650.0 million ($482.5 million outstanding at September 30, 2010)March 31, 2011) 3.85% convertible unsecured notes that were issued in August 2006 and mature in August 2026 was affected. The Operating Partnership recognized $13.9$4.6 million and $15.5$4.6 million in interest expense related to the stated coupon rate of 3.85% for the nine monthsquarters ended September 30,March 31, 2011 and 2010, and 2009, respectively. The amount of the conversion option as of the date of issuance calculated by the Operating Partnership using a 5.80% effective interest rate was $44.3 million and is being amortized to interest expense over the expected life of the convertible notes (through the first put date on August 18, 2011). Total amortization of the cash discount and conversion option discount on the unsecured notes resulted in a reduction to earnings of approximately $5.8$2.0 million and $7.2$1.9 million, respectively, or $0.02$0.01 per Unit and $0.02$0.01 per Unit, respectively, for the nine monthsquarters ended September 30,March 31, 2011 and 2010, and 2009, and is anticipated to result in a reduction to earnings of approximately $7.8$5.0 million or $0.03$0.02 per Unit during the full year of 2010 assuming the Operating Partnership does not repurchase any additional amounts of this debt.2011. In addition, the Operating Partnership decreased the January 1, 2009 balance of retained earnings (included in general partner’s capital) by $27.0 million, decreased the January 1, 2009 balance of notes by $17.3 million and increased the January 1, 2009 balance of paid in capital (included in general partner’s capital) by $44.3 million. The carrying amount of the conversion option remaining in paid in capital (included in general partner’s capital) was $44.3 million at both September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2009.2010. The unamortized cash and conversion option discounts totaled $6.9$3.0 million and $12.8$5.0 million at September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2009,2010, respectively.
3. Capital and Redeemable Limited Partners
     The following tables present the changes in the Operating Partnership’s issued and outstanding “Units” (which includes OP Units and Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) Units) and in the limited partners’ Units for the nine monthsquarter ended September 30, 2010:March 31, 2011:

12


     
  20102011 
General and Limited Partner Units
    
General and Limited Partner Units outstanding at January 1,  294,157,017303,809,279
Issued to General Partner:
Issuance of OP Units3,038,980
Exercise of EQR share options1,146,933
Employee Share Purchase Plan (ESPP)62,266
EQR restricted share grants, net154,939 
     
Issued to General Partner:
Limited Partners:
    
Conversion of Series E PreferenceLTIP Units,5,340
Issuance of OP Units1,057,304
Exercise of EQR share options2,035,178
Employee Share Purchase Plan (ESPP)136,453
Restricted EQR share grants, net  213,59858,942 
Issued to Limited Partners:
Issuance of LTIP Units94,096
OP Units issued through acquisitions189,700
OP Units Other:
Repurchased and retired(58,130)
    
General and Limited Partner Units outstanding at September 30,March 31,
  297,830,556308,271,339 
    
     
Limited Partner Units
    
Limited Partner Units outstanding at January 1,  14,197,96913,612,037 
Limited Partner IssuanceLTIP Units, net58,942
Conversion of EQR restricted shares to LTIP Units  94,096
Limited Partner OP Units issued through acquisitions189,700101,988 
Conversion of Limited Partner OP Units to EQR Common Shares  (622,32123,901)
    
Limited Partner Units outstanding at September 30,March 31,
  13,859,44413,749,066 
    
Limited Partner Units Ownership Interest in Operating Partnership  4.74.5%
     In September 2009, EQR announced the establishment of an At-The-Market (“ATM”) share offering program which would allow EQR to sell up to 17.0 million Common Shares from time to time over the next three years into the existing trading market at current market prices as well as through negotiated transactions. Per the terms of ERPOP’s partnership agreement, EQR contributes the net proceeds from all equity offerings to the capital of the Operating Partnership in exchange for additional OP Units (on a one-for-one Common Share per OP Unit Basis)basis). During the nine monthsquarter ended September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, EQR issued approximately 1.13.0 million Common Shares at an average price of $33.87$50.84 per share for total consideration of approximately $35.8$154.5 million through the ATM program. Concurrent with these transactions, the Operating Partnership issued approximately 1.13.0 million OP Units to EQR. EQR has not issued any shares under this program since January 13, 2011. Including its February 2011 prospectus supplement which added approximately 5.7 million Common Shares, EQR has 10.0 million Common Shares remaining available for issuance under the ATM

12


program as of March 31, 2011.
     EQR has a share repurchase program authorized by the Board of Trustees under which it has authorization to issue an additional 12.4repurchase up to $464.6 million of its shares under the ATM program as of September 30, 2010.
          On March 31, 2010,2011. No shares were repurchased during the Operating Partnership issued 188,571 OP Units at a price of $39.15 per OP Unit for total valuation of $7.4 million as partial consideration for the acquisition of one rental property. As the value of the OP Units issued was agreed by contract to be $35.00 per OP Unit, the difference between the contracted value and fair value (the closing price of EQR Common Shares on the closing date) was recorded as an increase to the purchase price.quarter ended March 31, 2011.
     During the nine monthsquarter ended September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, the Operating Partnership acquired all of its partner’s interest in two partially owned properties consisting of 432 units, one partially owned development project and one partially owned land parcel for $0.7 million. The Operating Partnership also increased its ownership in anotherconsolidated partially owned property through the buyoutconsisting of certain equity interests. One partially owned property buyout was funded through the issuance of 1,129 OP Units valued at $50,000.404 apartment units for $0.5 million. In conjunction with these transactions,this transaction, the Operating Partnership reduced paid in capital (included in general partner’s capital) by $1.3 million, other liabilities by $0.2 million and Noncontrolling Interests – Partially Owned Properties by $0.5 million.
          During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, EQR repurchased 58,130 of its Common Shares at an average price of $32.46 per share for total consideration of $1.9 million. These shares were retired subsequent to the repurchases. Concurrent with these transactions, the Operating Partnership repurchased and retired 58,130 OP Units previously issued to EQR. All of the shares repurchased during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 were repurchased from employees at the then current market prices to cover the minimum statutory tax withholding obligations related to the vesting of employees’ restricted shares. EQR has authorization to repurchase an additional $464.6 million of its shares as of September 30, 2010.
     The Limited Partners of the Operating Partnership as of September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 include various individuals and entities that contributed their properties to the Operating Partnership in exchange for OP Units, as well as the equity positions of the holders of LTIP Units. Subject to certain exceptions (including the “book-up” requirements of LTIP Units), Limited Partners

13


may exchange their Units with EQR for EQR Common Shares on a one-for-one basis. The carrying value of the Limited Partner Units (including redeemable interests) is allocated based on the number of Limited Partner Units in total in proportion to the number of Limited Partner Units in total plus the number of General Partner Units. Net income is allocated to the Limited Partner Units based on the weighted average ownership percentage during the period.
     The Operating Partnership has the right but not the obligation to make a cash payment instead of issuing EQR Common Shares to any and all holders of Limited Partner Units requesting an exchange of their OP Units with EQR. Once the Operating Partnership elects not to redeem the Limited Partner Units for cash, EQR is obligated to deliver EQR Common Shares to the exchanging limited partner.
     The Limited Partner Units are classified as either mezzanine equity or permanent equity. If EQR is required, either by contract or securities law, to deliver registered EQR Common Shares, such Limited Partner Units are differentiated and referred to as “Redeemable Limited Partner Units”. Instruments that require settlement in registered shares can not be classified in permanent equity as it is not always completely within an issuer’s control to deliver registered shares. Therefore, settlement in cash is assumed and that responsibility for settlement in cash is deemed to fall to the Operating Partnership as the primary source of cash for EQR, resulting in presentation in the mezzanine section of the balance sheet. The Redeemable Limited Partner Units are adjusted to the greater of carrying value or fair market value based on the Common Share price of EQR at the end of each respective reporting period. EQR has the ability to deliver unregistered EQR Common Shares for the remaining portion of the Limited Partner Units that are classified in permanent equity at September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2009.2010.
     The carrying value of the Redeemable Limited Partner Units is allocated based on the number of Redeemable Limited Partner Units in proportion to the number of Limited Partner Units in total. Such percentage of the total carrying value of Limited Partner Units which is ascribed to the Redeemable Limited Partner Units is then adjusted to the greater of carrying value or fair market value as described above. As of September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, the Redeemable Limited Partner Units have a redemption value of approximately $357.7$416.3 million, which represents the value of EQR Common Shares that would be issued in exchange with the limited partners of the Operating Partnership for Redeemable Limited Partner Units.
     The following table presents the change in the redemption value of the Redeemable Limited Partners for the nine monthsquarter ended September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 (amounts in thousands):
        
 2010  2011 
Balance at January 1, $258,280  $383,540 
Change in market value 108,576  29,294 
Change in carrying value  (9,154) 3,500 
      
Balance at September 30, $357,702 
Balance at March 31, $416,334 
      
     EQR contributes all net proceeds from its various equity offerings (including proceeds from exercise of options for EQR Common Shares) to the Operating Partnership. In return for those contributions, EQR receives a number of OP Units in ERPOP equal to the number of Common Shares it has issued in the equity offering (or in the case of a preferred equity offering, a number of preference units in ERPOP equal in number and having the same terms as the preferred shares issued in the equity offering).
     The following table presents the Operating Partnership’s issued and outstanding “Preference Units” as of September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2009:2010:

1413


                     
          Annual  Amounts in thousands 
  Redemption  Conversion  Dividend per  September 30,  December 31, 
  Date (1) (2)  Rate (2)  Unit (3)  2010  2009 
Preference Units:                    
                     
7.00% Series E Cumulative Convertible Preference Units; liquidation value $25 per unit; 323,666 and 328,466 units issued and outstanding at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively  11/1/98   1.1128  $1.75  $8,091  $8,211 
                     
                     
7.00% Series H Cumulative Convertible Preference Units; liquidation value $25 per unit; 22,459 units issued and outstanding at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009  6/30/98   1.4480  $1.75   562   562 
                     
8.29% Series K Cumulative Redeemable Preference Units; liquidation value $50 per unit; 1,000,000 units issued and outstanding at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009  12/10/26   N/A  $4.145   50,000   50,000 
                     
6.48% Series N Cumulative Redeemable Preference Units; liquidation value $250 per unit; 600,000 units issued and outstanding at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (4)  6/19/08   N/A  $16.20   150,000   150,000 
                   
              $208,653  $208,773 
                   
                 
          Amounts in thousands 
      Annual       
  Redemption  Dividend per  March 31,  December 31, 
  Date (1)  Unit (2)  2011  2010 
Preference Units:                
8.29% Series K Cumulative Redeemable Preference Units; liquidation value $50 per unit; 1,000,000 units issued and outstanding at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010  12/10/26  $4.145  $50,000  $50,000 
                 
6.48% Series N Cumulative Redeemable Preference Units; liquidation value $250 per unit; 600,000 units issued and outstanding at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (3)  6/19/08  $16.20   150,000   150,000 
               
          $200,000  $200,000 
               
 
(1) On or after the redemption date, redeemable preference units (Series K and N) may be redeemed for cash at the option of the Operating Partnership, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to the liquidation price per unit, plus accrued and unpaid distributions, if any, in conjunction with the concurrent redemption of the corresponding EQR Preferred Shares.
 
(2) On or after the redemption date, convertible preference units (Series E & H) may be redeemed under certain circumstances at the option of the Operating Partnership for cash (in the case of Series E) or OP Units (in the case of Series H), in whole or in part, at various redemption prices per unit based upon the contractual conversion rate, plus accrued and unpaid distributions, if any, in conjunction with the concurrent redemption/conversion of the corresponding EQR Preferred Shares. See Note 16 regarding the redemption of the Series E & H Preference Units.
(3)Dividends on all series of Preference Units are payable quarterly at various pay dates. The dividend listed for Series N is a Preference Unit rate and the equivalent depositary unit annual dividend is $1.62 per unit..unit.
 
(4)(3) The Series N Preference Units have a corresponding depositary unit that consists of ten times the number of units and one-tenth the liquidation value and dividend per unit.
4. Real Estate
     The following table summarizes the carrying amounts for the Operating Partnership’s investment in real estate (at cost) as of September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 and December 31, 20092010 (amounts in thousands):
                
 September 30, December 31,  March 31, December 31, 
 2010 2009  2011 2010 
Land $4,093,508 $3,650,324  $4,107,769 $4,110,275 
Depreciable property:  
Buildings and improvements 13,927,990 12,781,543  14,042,212 13,995,121 
Furniture, fixtures and equipment 1,233,017 1,111,978  1,236,821 1,231,391 
Projects under development:  
Land 79,204 106,716  27,505 28,260 
Construction-in-progress 419,833 562,263  69,646 102,077 
Land held for development:  
Land 228,091 181,430  183,674 198,465 
Construction-in-progress 62,728 70,890  28,294 36,782 
          
Investment in real estate 20,044,371 18,465,144  19,695,921 19,702,371 
Accumulated depreciation  (4,313,502)  (3,877,564)  (4,424,078)  (4,337,357)
          
Investment in real estate, net $15,730,869 $14,587,580  $15,271,843 $15,365,014 
          
     During the nine monthsquarter ended September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, the Operating Partnership acquired the entire equity interest

15


in the following from unaffiliated parties (purchase price in thousands):
                        
 Properties Units Purchase Price  Properties Apartment Units Purchase Price 
Rental Properties 14 4,164 $1,398,251  2 521 $139,018 
Land Parcels (four)   54,300 
Other (1)   11,750 
              
Total 14 4,164 $1,452,551  2 521 $150,768 
              
(1)Represents the acquisition of a 97,000 square foot commercial building adjacent to our Harbor Steps apartment property in downtown Seattle for potential redevelopment.
     During the nine monthsquarter ended September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, the Operating Partnership disposed of the following to unaffiliated parties (sales price in thousands):
             
  Properties  Units  Sales Price 
Rental Properties:            
Consolidated  11   2,437  $171,990 
Unconsolidated (1)  27   6,275   417,779 
Land Parcel (one)        4,000 
Condominium Conversion Properties  1   2   360 
          
Total  39   8,714  $594,129 
          

14


             
  Properties  Apartment Units  Sales Price 
Rental Properties — Consolidated  12   2,731  $261,771 
          
Total  12   2,731  $261,771 
          
(1)The Operating Partnership owned a 25% interest in these unconsolidated rental properties. Sales price listed is the gross sales price.
     The Operating Partnership recognized a net gain on sales of discontinued operations of approximately $69.5 million, a net gain on sales of unconsolidated entities of approximately $28.1 million and a net loss on sales of land parcels of approximately $1.2$123.8 million on the above sales.
          In addition to the properties discussed above, during the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Operating Partnership acquired the 75% equity interest it did not previously own in seven unconsolidated properties containing 1,811 units with a real estate value of $105.1 million. See Note 6 for further discussion.
5. Commitments to Acquire/Dispose of Real Estate
     In addition to the propertiesproperty that werewas subsequently acquired as discussed in Note 16, the Operating Partnership had entered into separate agreements to acquire the following (purchase price in thousands):
                        
 Properties Units Purchase Price  Properties Apartment Units Purchase Price 
Rental Properties 3 993 $221,600  3 975 $255,250 
Land Parcels (one)   12,000 
              
Total 3 993 $221,600  3 975 $267,250 
              
     In addition to the propertyproperties that waswere subsequently disposed of as discussed in Note 16, the Operating Partnership had entered into separate agreements to dispose of the following (sales price in thousands):
                        
 Properties Units Sales Price  Properties Apartment Units Sales Price 
Rental Properties 18 2,589 $282,650  7 2,797 $240,880 
              
Total 18 2,589 $282,650  7 2,797 $240,880 
              
     The closings of these pending transactions are subject to certain conditions and restrictions, therefore, there can be no assurance that these transactions will be consummated or that the final terms will not differ in material respects from those summarized in the preceding paragraphs.
6. Investments in Partially Owned Entities
     The Operating Partnership has co-invested in various properties with unrelated third parties which are either consolidated or accounted for under the equity method of accounting (unconsolidated). The following tables and information summarize the Operating Partnership’s investments in partially owned entities as of September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 (amounts in thousands except for project and apartment unit amounts):

15


                     
  Consolidated 
  Development Projects (VIEs)       
  Held for  Completed,  Completed       
  and/or Under  Not  and       
  Development  Stabilized (4)  Stabilized  Other  Total 
Total projects (1)     1   3   19   23 
                
                     
Total apartment units (1)     490   898   3,440   4,828 
                
                     
Balance sheet information at 3/31/11 (at 100%):                    
ASSETS                    
Investment in real estate $44,103  $257,480  $263,567  $439,481  $1,004,631 
Accumulated depreciation     (1,896)  (17,162)  (128,088)  (147,146)
                
Investment in real estate, net  44,103   255,584   246,405   311,393   857,485 
Cash and cash equivalents  536   650   2,454   7,744   11,384 
Deposits — restricted  1,120   1,189   2,507   8   4,824 
Escrow deposits — mortgage        163   1,470   1,633 
Deferred financing costs, net     2,206   254   403   2,863 
Other assets  78   117   181   258   634 
                
Total assets $45,837  $259,746  $251,964  $321,276  $878,823 
                
                     
LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL                    
Mortgage notes payable $18,342  $142,448  $200,765  $215,631  $577,186 
Accounts payable & accrued expenses  617   1,157   911   2,371   5,056 
Accrued interest payable  1,528   528   465   1,109   3,630 
Other liabilities  1,280   870   273   795   3,218 
Security deposits     1,173   249   1,382   2,804 
                
Total liabilities  21,767   146,176   202,663   221,288   591,894 
                
                     
Noncontrolling Interests — Partially Owned Properties  3,418   5,025   4,078   (4,834)  7,687 
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)     (495)        (495)
General and Limited Partners’ Capital  20,652   109,040   45,223   104,822   279,737 
                
Total capital  24,070   113,570   49,301   99,988   286,929 
                
Total liabilities and capital $45,837  $259,746  $251,964  $321,276  $878,823 
                
                     
Debt — Secured (2):                    
EQR Ownership (3) $18,342  $142,448  $200,765  $162,912  $524,467 
Noncontrolling Ownership           52,719   52,719 
                
Total (at 100%) $18,342  $142,448  $200,765  $215,631  $577,186 
                

16


                     
  Consolidated  Unconsolidated 
  Development Projects (VIEs)            
  Held for  Completed          Institutional 
  and/or Under  and          Joint 
  Development  Stabilized  Other  Total  Ventures (4) 
Total projects (1)     4   20   24    
                
                     
Total units (1)     1,302   3,720   5,022    
                
                     
Balance sheet information at 9/30/10 (at 100%):                    
ASSETS                    
Investment in real estate $306,433  $390,435  $433,456  $1,130,324  $ 
Accumulated depreciation     (15,406)  (121,017)  (136,423)   
                
Investment in real estate, net  306,433   375,029   312,439   993,901    
Cash and cash equivalents  3,511   6,732   15,379   25,622    
Deposits – restricted  1,887   3,086   8   4,981    
Escrow deposits – mortgage     704   3,631   4,335    
Deferred financing costs, net  3,393   403   260   4,056    
Other assets  365   383   215   963    
                
Total assets $315,589  $386,337  $331,932  $1,033,858  $ 
                
                     
LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL                    
Mortgage notes payable $154,324  $275,600  $301,969  $731,893  $ 
Accounts payable & accrued expenses  5,244   2,376   2,717   10,337    
Accrued interest payable  1,565   585   1,622   3,772    
Other liabilities  3,961   399   1,226   5,586    
Security deposits  860   941   1,566   3,367    
                
Total liabilities  165,954   279,901   309,100   754,955    
                
                     
Noncontrolling Interests – Partially Owned Properties  8,443   4,464   (4,367)  8,540    
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)  (2,141)        (2,141)   
General and Limited Partners’ Capital  143,333   101,972   27,199   272,504    
                
Total capital  149,635   106,436   22,832   278,903    
                
Total liabilities and capital $315,589  $386,337  $331,932  $1,033,858  $ 
                
                     
Debt – Secured (2):                    
EQR Ownership (3) $154,324  $275,600  $221,858  $651,782  $ 
Noncontrolling Ownership        80,111   80,111    
                
Total (at 100%) $154,324  $275,600  $301,969  $731,893  $ 
                

17


                                        
 Consolidated Unconsolidated  Consolidated 
 Development Projects (VIEs)    Development Projects (VIEs)     
 Held for Institutional  Held for Completed,       
 and/or Under Completed Joint  and/or Under Not Completed     
 Development and Stabilized Other Total Ventures (4)  Development Stabilized (4) and Stabilized Other Total 
Operating information for the nine months ended 9/30/10 (at 100%): 
Operating information for the quarter ended 3/31/11 (at 100%): 
Operating revenue $3,507 $18,946 $41,885 $64,338 $44,179  $ $2,992 $4,680 $13,949 $21,621 
Operating expenses 3,032 7,069 14,974 25,075 22,036  161 1,093 1,507 4,733 7,494 
                      
  
Net operating income 475 11,877 26,911 39,263 22,143 
Net operating (loss) income  (161) 1,899 3,173 9,216 14,127 
Depreciation  9,174 11,125 20,299 11,189   1,897 2,189 3,741 7,827 
General and administrative/other 52 107 34 193 141  19 2 9 11 41 
                      
  
Operating income 423 2,596 15,752 18,771 10,813 
Operating (loss) income  (180)  975 5,464 6,259 
Interest and other income 21 8 20 49 73  4  2 5 11 
Other expenses  (342)   (493)  (835)    (124)    (17)  (141)
Interest:  
Expense incurred, net  (2,382)  (4,804)  (15,258)  (22,444)  (16,482)  (234)  (1,528)  (1,389)  (3,882)  (7,033)
Amortization of deferred financing costs   (566)  (172)  (738)  (573)   (601)  (139)  (102)  (842)
                      
  
(Loss) before income and other taxes and discontinued operations  (2,280)  (2,766)  (151)  (5,197)  (6,169)
(Loss) income before income and other taxes and discontinued operations  (534)  (2,129)  (551) 1,468  (1,746)
Income and other tax (expense) benefit  (30)   (24)  (54)  (153)  (45)    (2)  (47)
Net gain on sales of discontinued operations 711  7,997 8,708 9,967  169    169 
                      
  
Net (loss) income $(1,599) $(2,766) $7,822 $3,457 $3,645  $(410) $(2,129) $(551) $1,466 $(1,624)
                      
 
(1) Project and apartment unit counts exclude all uncompleted development projects until those projects are substantially completed.
 
(2) All debt is non-recourse to the Operating Partnership with the exception of $14.0 million in mortgage debt on variousone development projects.project.
 
(3) Represents the Operating Partnership’s current economic ownership interest.
 
(4) On April 30, 2010, the Operating Partnership acquired the 75% equity interest it did not own in seven previously unconsolidated properties containing 1,811Projects included here are substantially complete. However, they may still require additional exterior and interior work for all apartment units in exchangeto be available for an approximate $30.0 million payment to its partner. In addition, the Operating Partnership repaid the net $70.0 million mortgage loan, which was to mature on May 1, 2010, concurrent with closing using proceeds drawn from the Operating Partnership’s line of credit. During the third quarter of 2010, the Operating Partnership sold its 25% equity interest in the remaining 24 unconsolidated properties containing 5,635 units in exchange for an approximate $25.4 million payment from its partner and the related $264.8 million in non-recourse mortgage debt was extinguished by the partner at closing. As of September 30, 2010, the Operating Partnership no longer held an interest in these unconsolidated institutional joint ventures.leasing.
     In 2010, the Operating Partnership admitted an 80% institutional partner to an entity owning a developable land parcel in Florida in exchange for $11.7 million in cash and retained a 20% equity interest. This land parcel is now unconsolidated. Total project cost is approximately $76.1 million and construction is expected to start in the second quarter of 2011. The Operating Partnership is responsible for constructing the project and has given certain construction cost overrun guarantees. The Operating Partnership’s remaining funding obligation is currently estimated at approximately $2.3 million.
     The Operating Partnership is the controlling partner in various consolidated partnership properties and development properties having a noncontrolling interest book value of $8.5$7.7 million at September 30, 2010.March 31, 2011. The Operating Partnership has identified its development partnerships as VIEs as the Operating Partnership provides substantially all of the capital for these ventures (other than third party mortgage debt, if any) despite the fact that each partner legally owns 50% of each venture. The Operating Partnership is the primary beneficiary as it exerts the most significant power over the ventures, absorbs the majority of the expected losses and has the right to receive a majority of the expected residual returns. The assets net of liabilities of the Operating Partnership’s VIEs are restricted in their use to the specific VIE to which they relate and are not available for general corporate use. The Operating Partnership does not have any unconsolidated VIEs.
7. Deposits — Restricted
     The following table presents the Operating Partnership’s restricted deposits as of September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 and December 31, 20092010 (amounts in thousands):

17


                
 September 30, December 31,  March 31, December 31, 
 2010 2009  2011 2010 
Tax—deferred (1031) exchange proceeds $ $244,257  $212,779 $103,887 
Earnest money on pending acquisitions 1,710 6,000  8,250 9,264 
Restricted deposits on debt (1) 55,746 49,565  41,263 18,966 
Resident security and utility deposits 41,606 39,361  41,283 40,745 
Other 10,546 12,825  6,030 8,125 
          
  
Totals $109,608 $352,008  $309,605 $180,987 
          
 
(1) Primarily represents amounts held in escrow by the lender and released as draw requests are made on fully funded

18


development mortgage loans.
8. Mortgage Notes Payable
     As of September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, the Operating Partnership had outstanding mortgage debt of approximately $4.8$4.6 billion.
     During the nine monthsquarter ended September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, the Operating Partnership:
Repaid $503.6 million of mortgage loans;
Obtained $124.0 million of new mortgage loan proceeds;
Assumed $338.2 million of mortgage debt on six acquired properties;
Was released from $40.0 million of mortgage debt assumed by the purchaser on two disposed properties; and
Assumed $112.6 million of mortgage debt on seven previously unconsolidated properties and repaid the net $70.0 million mortgage loan (net of $42.6 million of cash collateral held by the lender) concurrent with closing using proceeds drawn from the Operating Partnership’s line of credit.
          The Operating Partnership recorded approximately $1.0Repaid $205.0 million of write-offsmortgage loans;
Obtained $0.7 million of unamortized deferred financing costs during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as additional interest expense related tonew mortgage loan proceeds; and
Assumed $26.9 million of mortgage debt extinguishment of mortgages.on one acquired property.
     As of September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, the Operating Partnership had $563.6$543.4 million of secured debt subject to third party credit enhancement.
     As of September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, scheduled maturities for the Operating Partnership’s outstanding mortgage indebtedness were at various dates through September 1, 2048. At September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, the interest rate range on the Operating Partnership’s mortgage debt was 0.18%0.20% to 12.465%11.25%. During the nine monthsquarter ended September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, the weighted average interest rate on the Operating Partnership’s mortgage debt was 4.84%4.76%.
9. Notes
     As of September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, the Operating Partnership had outstanding unsecured notes of approximately $5.2$5.1 billion.
     During the nine monthsquarter ended September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, the Operating Partnership issued $600.0Partnership:
Repaid $93.1 million of ten-year 4.75% fixed rate public6.95% unsecured notes in a public offering at an all-in effective interest rate of 5.09%, receiving net proceeds of $595.4 million before underwriting fees and other expenses.maturity.
     As of September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, scheduled maturities for the Operating Partnership’s outstanding notes were at various dates through 2026. At September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, the interest rate range on the Operating Partnership’s notes was 0.76%0.75% to 7.57%. During the nine monthsquarter ended September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, the weighted average interest rate on the Operating Partnership’s notes was 5.10%5.08%.
10. Lines of Credit
     The Operating Partnership has a $1.425 billion (net of $75.0 million which had been committed by a now bankrupt financial institution and is not available for borrowing) unsecured revolving credit facility maturing on February 28, 2012, with the ability to increase available borrowings by an additional $500.0 million by adding additional banks to the facility or obtaining the agreement of existing banks to increase their commitments. Advances under the credit facility bear interest at variable rates based upon LIBOR at various interest periods plus a spread (currently 0.50%) dependent upon the Operating Partnership’s credit rating or based on bids received from the lending group. EQR has guaranteed the Operating Partnership’s credit facility up to the maximum amount and for the full term of the facility.
     As of September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, the amount available on the credit facility was $1.2$1.34 billion (net of $84.3$83.7 million which was restricted/dedicated to support letters of credit net of $146.0 million outstanding and net of the $75.0 million discussed above). DuringThe Operating Partnership did not draw and had no balance outstanding on its revolving credit facility at any time during the nine monthsquarter ended September 30, 2010, the weighted average interest rate was 0.67%.March 31, 2011.

18


11. Derivative and Other Fair Value Instruments
     The valuation of financial instruments requires the Operating Partnership to make estimates and judgments that affect the fair value of the instruments. The Operating Partnership, where possible, bases the fair values of its financial

19


instruments, including its derivative instruments, on listed market prices and third party quotes. Where these are not available, the Operating Partnership bases its estimates on current instruments with similar terms and maturities or on other factors relevant to the financial instruments.
     The carrying values of the Operating Partnership’s mortgage notes payable and unsecured notes (including its line of credit) were approximately $4.8$4.6 billion and $5.3$5.1 billion, respectively, at September 30, 2010.March 31, 2011. The fair values of the Operating Partnership’s mortgage notes payable and unsecured notes (including its line of credit) were approximately $5.0$4.5 billion and $5.8$5.4 billion, respectively, at September 30, 2010.March 31, 2011. The fair values of the Operating Partnership’s financial instruments (other than mortgage notes payable, unsecured notes, lines of credit, derivative instruments and investment securities) including cash and cash equivalents and other financial instruments, approximate their carrying or contract values.
     In the normal course of business, the Operating Partnership is exposed to the effect of interest rate changes. The Operating Partnership seeks to manage these risks by following established risk management policies and procedures including the use of derivatives to hedge interest rate risk on debt instruments.
     The following table summarizes the Operating Partnership’s consolidated derivative instruments at September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 (dollar amounts are in thousands):
                        
 Forward Development  Forward Development 
 Fair Value Starting Cash Flow  Fair Value Starting Cash Flow 
 Hedges (1) Swaps (2) Hedges (3)  Hedges (1) Swaps (2) Hedges (3) 
Current Notional Balance $315,693 $850,000 $91,343  $315,693 $950,000 $88,833 
Lowest Possible Notional $315,693 $850,000 $3,020  $315,693 $950,000 $3,020 
Highest Possible Notional $317,694 $850,000 $91,343  $317,694 $950,000 $91,343 
Lowest Interest Rate  2.009%  3.478%  4.059%  2.009%  3.478%  4.059%
Highest Interest Rate  4.800%  4.695%  4.059%  4.800%  4.695%  4.059%
Earliest Maturity Date 2012 2021 2011  2012 2021 2011 
Latest Maturity Date 2013 2023 2011  2013 2023 2011 
 
(1) Fair Value Hedges — Converts outstanding fixed rate debt to a floating interest rate.
 
(2) Forward Starting Swaps — Designed to partially fix the interest rate in advance of a planned future debt issuance. These swaps have mandatory counterparty terminations from 2012 through 2014, and $300.0$350.0 million, $400.0 million and $150.0$200.0 million are designated for 2011, 2012 and 2013 maturities, respectively.
 
(3) Development Cash Flow Hedges — Converts outstanding floating rate debt to a fixed interest rate.
     The following tables provide the location of the Operating Partnership’s derivative instruments within the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets and their fair market values as of September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2009,2010, respectively (amounts in thousands):
                 
  Asset Derivatives  Liability Derivatives 
  Balance Sheet      Balance Sheet    
September 30, 2010 Location  Fair Value  Location  Fair Value 
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:                
Interest Rate Contracts:                
Fair Value Hedges Other assets $15,029  Other liabilities $ 
Forward Starting Swaps Other assets    Other liabilities  (91,239)
Development Cash Flow Hedges Other assets    Other liabilities  (2,141)
               
Total     $15,029      $(93,380)
               
                                
 Asset Derivatives Liability Derivatives  Asset Derivatives Liability Derivatives 
 Balance Sheet Balance Sheet    Balance Sheet Balance Sheet   
December 31, 2009 Location Fair Value Location Fair Value 
March 31, 2011 Location Fair Value Location Fair Value 
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:  
Interest Rate Contracts:  
Fair Value Hedges Other assets $5,186 Other liabilities $  Other assets $11,029 Other liabilities $ 
Forward Starting Swaps Other assets 23,630 Other liabilities   Other assets 3,959 Other liabilities  (33,184)
Development Cash Flow Hedges Other assets  Other liabilities  (3,577) Other assets  Other liabilities  (495)
          
Total $28,816 $(3,577) $14,988 $(33,679)
          

2019


                 
  Asset Derivatives  Liability Derivatives 
  Balance Sheet      Balance Sheet    
December 31, 2010 Location  Fair Value  Location  Fair Value 
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:                
Interest Rate Contracts:                
Fair Value Hedges Other assets $12,521  Other liabilities $ 
Forward Starting Swaps Other assets  3,276  Other liabilities  (37,756)
Development Cash Flow Hedges Other assets    Other liabilities  (1,322)
               
Total     $15,797      $(39,078)
               
     The following tables provide a summary of the effect of fair value hedges on the Operating Partnership’s accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations for the nine monthsquarters ended September 30,March 31, 2011 and 2010, and 2009, respectively (amounts in thousands):
                                        
 Location of        Location of Gain/(Loss) Amount of Gain/(Loss) Income Statement Amount of Gain/(Loss) 
 Gain/(Loss) Amount of Gain/(Loss) Income Statement Amount of Gain/(Loss) 
September 30, 2010 Recognized in Income Recognized in Income Location of Hedged Recognized in Income 
March 31, 2011 Recognized in Income Recognized in Income Location of Hedged Recognized in Income 
Type of Fair Value Hedge on Derivative on Derivative Hedged Item Item Gain/(Loss) on Hedged Item  on Derivative on Derivative Hedged Item Item Gain/(Loss) on Hedged Item 
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:  
Interest Rate Contracts:  
Interest Rate Swaps Interest expense $9,842 Fixed rate debt Interest expense $(9,842) Interest expense $(1,492) Fixed rate debt Interest expense $1,492 
          
Total $9,842 $(9,842) $(1,492) $1,492 
          
                                        
 Location of        Location of Gain/(Loss) Amount of Gain/(Loss) Income Statement Amount of Gain/(Loss) 
 Gain/(Loss) Amount of Gain/(Loss) Income Statement Amount of Gain/(Loss) 
September 30, 2009 Recognized in Income Recognized in Income Location of Hedged Recognized in Income 
March 31, 2010 Recognized in Income Recognized in Income Location of Hedged Recognized in Income 
Type of Fair Value Hedge on Derivative on Derivative Hedged Item Item Gain/(Loss) on Hedged Item  on Derivative on Derivative Hedged Item Item Gain/(Loss) on Hedged Item 
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:  
Interest Rate Contracts:  
Interest Rate Swaps Interest expense $(890) Fixed rate debt Interest expense $890  Interest expense $2,742 Fixed rate debt Interest expense $(2,742)
          
Total $(890) $890  $2,742 $(2,742)
          
     The following tables provide a summary of the effect of cash flow hedges on the Operating Partnership’s accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations for the nine monthsquarters ended September 30,March 31, 2011 and 2010, and 2009, respectively (amounts in thousands):
                                        
 Effective Portion Ineffective Portion   Effective Portion  Ineffective Portion 
 Amount of Location of Gain/(Loss) Amount of Gain/(Loss) Location of Amount of Gain/(Loss)  Amount of Location of Gain/(Loss) Amount of Gain/(Loss) Location of Amount of Gain/(Loss) 
 Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from Reclassified from Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from  Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from Reclassified from Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from 
September 30, 2010 Recognized in OCI Accumulated OCI Accumulated OCI Recognized in Income Accumulated OCI 
March 31, 2011 Recognized in OCI Accumulated OCI Accumulated OCI Recognized in Income Accumulated OCI 
Type of Cash Flow Hedge on Derivative into Income into Income on Derivative into Income  on Derivative into Income into Income on Derivative into Income 
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:  
Interest Rate Contracts:  
Forward Starting Swaps/Treasury Locks $(124,908) Interest expense $(2,379) N/A $  $5,255 Interest expense $(956) N/A $ 
Development Interest Rate Swaps/Caps 1,436 Interest expense  N/A   827 Interest expense  N/A  
              
Total $(123,472) $(2,379) $  $6,082 $(956) $ 
              
                                        
 Effective Portion Ineffective Portion   Effective Portion  Ineffective Portion 
 Amount of Location of Gain/(Loss) Amount of Gain/(Loss) Location of Amount of Gain/(Loss)  Amount of Location of Gain/(Loss) Amount of Gain/(Loss) Location of Amount of Gain/(Loss) 
 Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from Reclassified from Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from  Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from Reclassified from Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from 
September 30, 2009 Recognized in OCI Accumulated OCI Accumulated OCI Recognized in Income Accumulated OCI 
March 31, 2010 Recognized in OCI Accumulated OCI Accumulated OCI Recognized in Income Accumulated OCI 
Type of Cash Flow Hedge on Derivative into Income into Income on Derivative into Income  on Derivative into Income into Income on Derivative into Income 
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:  
Interest Rate Contracts:  
Forward Starting Swaps/Treasury Locks $9,370 Interest expense $(3,014) N/A $  $(13,652) Interest expense $(726) N/A $ 
Development Interest Rate Swaps/Caps 2,823 Interest expense  N/A   149 Interest expense  N/A  
              
Total $12,193 $(3,014) $  $(13,503) $(726) $ 
              
     As of September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2009,2010, there were approximately $116.9$51.3 million and $58.3 million in deferred losses, net, included in accumulated other comprehensive loss and $4.2 million in deferred gains, net, included in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income,, respectively, related to derivative instruments. Based on the estimated fair values of the net derivative instruments at September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, the Operating Partnership may

20


recognize an estimated $6.4$4.8 million of accumulated other comprehensive loss(loss) as additional interest expense during the twelve months ending September 30, 2011.
          In July 2010, the Operating Partnership paid approximately $10.0 million to settle a forward starting swap in conjunction with the issuance of $600.0 million of ten-year fixed rate public notes. The entire amount was deferred as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss and is being recognized as an increase to interest expense over the term of the notes.March 31, 2012.
          The following table sets forth the maturity, amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, book/fair value and interest and other income of the various investment securities held as of September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 (amounts in thousands):

21


                         
      Other Assets    
      Amortized  Unrealized  Unrealized  Book/  Interest and 
Security Maturity  Cost  Gains  Losses  Fair Value  Other Income 
Available-for-Sale
                        
FDIC-insured certificates of deposit Less than one year $  $  $  $  $61 
Other N/A    675   411      1,086    
                    
Total     $675  $411  $  $1,086  $61 
                    
                         
      Other Assets       
      Amortized  Unrealized  Unrealized  Book/  Interest and 
Security Maturity  Cost  Gains  Losses  Fair Value  Other Income 
Available-for-Sale Investment Securities  N/A  $675  $666  $  $1,341  $ 
                   
Total     $675  $666  $  $1,341  $ 
                   
          A three-level valuation hierarchy exists for disclosure of fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels are defined as follows:
  Level 1 — Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
 
  Level 2 — Inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.
 
  Level 3 — Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.
          The following tables provide a summary of the fair value measurements at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 for each major category of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
                 
      Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using 
      Quoted Prices in       
      Active Markets for  Significant Other  Significant 
      Identical Assets/Liabilities  Observable Inputs  Unobservable Inputs 
Description 3/31/2011  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3) 
Assets
                
Derivatives $14,988  $  $14,988  $ 
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan  49,466   49,466       
Available-for-Sale Investment Securities  1,341   1,341       
             
Total $65,795  $50,807  $14,988  $ 
             
                 
Liabilities
                
Derivatives $33,679  $  $33,679  $ 
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan  49,466   49,466       
             
Total $83,145  $49,466  $33,679  $ 
             
                 
Redeemable Limited Partners $416,334  $  $416,334  $ 

21


                 
      Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using 
      Quoted Prices in       
      Active Markets for  Significant Other  Significant 
      Identical Assets/Liabilities  Observable Inputs  Unobservable Inputs 
Description 12/31/2010  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3) 
Assets
                
Derivatives $15,797  $  $15,797  $ 
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan  58,132   58,132       
Available-for-Sale Investment Securities  1,194   1,194       
             
Total $75,123  $59,326  $15,797  $ 
             
                 
Liabilities
                
Derivatives $39,078  $  $39,078  $ 
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan  58,132   58,132       
             
Total $97,210  $58,132  $39,078  $ 
             
                 
Redeemable Limited Partners $383,540  $  $383,540  $ 
          The Operating Partnership’s derivative positions are valued using models developed by the respective counterparty as well as models developed internally by the Operating Partnership that use as their basis readily observable market parameters (such as forward yield curves and credit default swap data) and are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. In addition, employee. Employee holdings other than EQR Common Shares within the supplemental executive retirement plan (the “SERP”) have a fair value of $52.9 million as of September 30, 2010are valued using quoted market prices for identical assets and are included in other assets and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. These SERP investments are valued using quoted market prices for identical assets and are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy.
The Operating Partnership’s investment securities are valued using quoted market prices or readily available market interest rate data. The quoted market prices are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy and the market interest rate data are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. Redeemable Limited Partners are valued using the quoted market price of EQR Common Shares and are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.
          The Operating Partnership’s real estate asset impairment charge recognized in the second quarter of 2009 was the result of an analysis of the parcel’s estimated fair value (determined using internally developed models that were based on market assumptions and comparable sales data) (Level 3) compared to its current capitalized carrying value. The market assumptions used as inputs to the Operating Partnership’s fair value model include construction costs, leasing assumptions, growth rates, discount rates, terminal capitalization rates and development yields, along with the Operating Partnership’s current plans for each individual asset. The Operating Partnership uses data on its existing portfolio of properties and its recent acquisition and development properties, as well as similar market data from third party sources, when available, in determining these inputs. The valuation technique used to measure fair value is consistent with how similar assets were measured in prior periods. See Note 16 for further discussion.Shares.
12. Earnings Per Unit
          The following tables set forth the computation of net income per Unit — basic and net income per Unit — diluted (amounts in thousands except per Unit amounts):

22


                        
 Nine Months Ended September 30, Quarter Ended September 30,  Quarter Ended March 31, 
 2010 2009 2010 2009  2011 2010 
Numerator for net income per Unit — basic and diluted:
 
Income from continuing operations $26,853 $33,201 $19,884 $9,029 
Numerator for net income per Unit — basic and diluted (1):
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations $7,727 $(9,407)
Net loss attributable to Noncontrolling Interests — Partially Owned Properties 623 391 188 317  40 250 
Allocation to Preference Units  (10,855)  (10,859)  (3,617)  (3,619)  (3,466)  (3,620)
Allocation to Preference Interests and Junior Preference Units   (9)   (2)
              
 
Income from continuing operations available to Units 16,621 22,724 16,455 5,725 
Income (loss) from continuing operations available to Units 4,301  (12,777)
Discontinued operations, net 70,918 301,517 9,942 134,336  125,339 67,263 
              
 
Numerator for net income per Unit — basic and diluted $87,539 $324,241 $26,397 $140,061 
Numerator for net income per Unit — basic and diluted (1) $129,640 $54,486 
              
  
Denominator for net income per Unit — basic and diluted:
 
Denominator for net income per Unit — basic and diluted (1):
 
Denominator for net income per Unit — basic 295,572 288,990 296,348 289,262  306,248 294,450 
Effect of dilutive securities:  
Dilution for Units issuable upon assumed exercise/vesting of EQR’s long-term compensation award shares/units 3,459 528 4,031 953  4,219 
            
 
Denominator for net income per Unit — diluted 299,031 289,518 300,379 290,215 
Denominator for net income per Unit — diluted (1) 310,467 294,450 
              
 
Net income per Unit — basic $0.296 $1.121 $0.089 $0.484  $0.42 $0.18 
              
 
Net income per Unit — diluted $0.293 $1.120 $0.088 $0.483  $0.42 $0.18 
              
  
Net income per Unit — basic:
  
Income from continuing operations available to Units $0.056 $0.078 $0.055 $0.020 
Income (loss) from continuing operations available to Units $0.014 $(0.043)
Discontinued operations, net 0.240 1.043 0.034 0.464  0.409 0.228 
              
 
Net income per Unit — basic $0.296 $1.121 $0.089 $0.484  $0.423 $0.185 
              
  
Net income per Unit — diluted:
 
Income from continuing operations available to Units $0.056 $0.078 $0.055 $0.020 
Net income per Unit — diluted (1):
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations available to Units $0.014 $(0.043)
Discontinued operations, net 0.237 1.042 0.033 0.463  0.404 0.228 
         
      
Net income per Unit — diluted $0.293 $1.120 $0.088 $0.483  $0.418 $0.185 
              
(1)Potential Units issuable from the assumed exercising/vesting of EQR long-term compensation award shares/units are automatically anti-dilutive and therefore excluded from the diluted earnings per Unit calculation as the Operating Partnership had a loss from continuing operations for the quarter ended March 31, 2010.
Convertible preference interests/units that could be converted into 396,0980 and 404,004 weighted average Common Shares (which would be contributed to the Operating Partnership in exchange for OP Units) for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and 393,724 and 400,489397,611 weighted average Common Shares (which would be contributed to the Operating Partnership in exchange for OP Units) for the quarters ended September 30,March 31, 2011 and 2010, and 2009, respectively, were outstanding but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per Unit because the effects would be anti-dilutive. In addition, the effect of the Common Shares/OP Units that could ultimately be issued upon the conversion/exchange of the Operating Partnership’s $650.0 million ($482.5 million outstanding at September 30, 2010)March 31, 2011) exchangeable senior notes was not included in the computation of diluted earnings per Unit because the effects would be anti-dilutive.
13. Discontinued Operations
          The Operating Partnership has presented separately as discontinued operations in all periods the results of operations for all consolidated assets disposed of and all properties held for sale, if any.
          The components of discontinued operations are outlined below and include the results of operations for the respective periods that the Operating Partnership owned such assets during the nine months and quarters ended September 30,March 31, 2011 and 2010 and 2009 (amounts in thousands).

23


                        
 Nine Months Ended September 30, Quarter Ended September 30,  Quarter Ended March 31, 
 2010 2009 2010 2009  2011 2010 
REVENUES
  
Rental income $7,296 $90,113 $1,914 $21,018  $5,890 $25,969 
              
Total revenues 7,296 90,113 1,914 21,018  5,890 25,969 
              
  
EXPENSES (1)
  
Property and maintenance 2,942 29,420 310 7,456  2,709 7,831 
Real estate taxes and insurance 1,078 9,565 223 2,209  477 2,777 
Depreciation 1,522 22,736 377 5,487  1,395 6,692 
General and administrative 26 29 10 4  9 3 
              
Total expenses 5,568 61,750 920 15,156  4,590 17,303 
              
  
Discontinued operating income 1,728 28,363 994 5,862  1,300 8,666 
  
Interest and other income 360 16  3  44 6 
Interest (2):  
Expense incurred, net  (659)  (1,372)  (318)  (352) 326  (1,208)
Amortization of deferred financing costs  (11)  (335)  (8)  (293)  (51)  (201)
Income and other tax (expense) benefit  (38)  (88)  (11)  (19)  (34)  (36)
              
  
Discontinued operations 1,380 26,584 657 5,201  1,585 7,227 
Net gain on sales of discontinued operations 69,538 274,933 9,285 129,135  123,754 60,036 
              
 
Discontinued operations, net $70,918 $301,517 $9,942 $134,336  $125,339 $67,263 
              
 
(1) Includes expenses paid in the current period for properties sold or held for sale in prior periods related to the Operating Partnership’s period of ownership.
 
(2) Includes only interest expense specific to secured mortgage notes payable for properties sold and/or held for sale.
          For the properties sold during the nine monthsquarter ended September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, the investment in real estate, net of accumulated depreciation, and the mortgage notes payable balances at December 31, 20092010 were $94.9$135.3 million and $49.5$11.0 million, respectively.
14. Commitments and Contingencies
          The Operating Partnership, as an owner of real estate, is subject to various Federal, state and local environmental laws. Compliance by the Operating Partnership with existing laws has not had a material adverse effect on the Operating Partnership. However, the Operating Partnership cannot predict the impact of new or changed laws or regulations on its current properties or on properties that it may acquire in the future.
          The Operating Partnership is party to a housing discrimination lawsuit brought by a non-profit civil rights organization in April 2006 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland. The suit alleges that the Operating Partnership designed and built approximately 300 of its properties in violation of the accessibility requirements of the Fair Housing Act and Americans With Disabilities Act. The suit seeks actual and punitive damages, injunctive relief (including modification of non-compliant properties), costs and attorneys’ fees. The Operating Partnership believes it has a number of viable defenses, including that a majority of the named properties were completed before the operative dates of the statutes in question and/or were not designed or built by the Operating Partnership. Accordingly, the Operating Partnership is defending the suit vigorously. Due to the pendency of the Operating Partnership’s defenses and the uncertainty of many other critical factual and legal issues, it is not possible to determine or predict the outcome of the suit or a possible loss or a range of loss, and no amounts have been accrued at September 30, 2010.March 31, 2011. While no assurances can be given, the Operating Partnership does not believe that the suit, if adversely determined, would have a material adverse effect on the Operating Partnership.
          The Operating Partnership does not believe there is any other litigation pending or threatened against it that, individually or in the aggregate, may reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the Operating Partnership.
          The Operating Partnership has established a reserve and recorded a corresponding reduction to its net gain on sales of discontinued operations related to potential liabilities associated with its condominium conversion activities. The reserve covers potential product liability related to each conversion. The Operating Partnership periodically assesses the adequacy of

24


the reserve and makes adjustments as necessary. During the nine monthsquarter ended September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, the Operating Partnership recorded additional reserves of paid

24


approximately $0.7 million, paid approximately $1.4$0.2 million in claimssettlements and legal fees and released approximately $0.2 million of remaining reserves for settled claims. As a result, the Operating Partnership had total reserves of approximately $5.8$2.9 million at September 30, 2010.March 31, 2011. While no assurances can be given, the Operating Partnership does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these potential liabilities, if adversely determined, would have a material adverse effect on the Operating Partnership.
          As of September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, the Operating Partnership has fivefour projects totaling 1,499747 apartment units in various stages of development with estimated completion dates ranging through September 30, 2012,2013, as well as other completed development projects that are in various stages of lease up or are stabilized. Some of the projects were developed solely by the Operating Partnership, while others were co-developed with various third party development partners. The development venture agreements with partners are primarily deal-specific, with differing terms regarding profit-sharing, equity contributions, returns on investment, buy-sell agreements and other customary provisions. The partner is most often the “general” or “managing” partner of the development venture. The typical buy-sell arrangements contain appraisal rights and provisions that provide the right, but not the obligation, for the Operating Partnership to acquire the partner’s interest in the project at fair market value upon the expiration of a negotiated time period (typically two to five years after substantial completion of the project).
15. Reportable Segments
          Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by senior management. Senior management decides how resources are allocated and assesses performance on a monthly basis.
          The Operating Partnership’s primary business is the acquisition, development and management of multifamily residential properties, which includes the generation of rental and other related income through the leasing of apartment units to residents. Senior management evaluates the performance of each of our apartment communities individually and geographically, and both on a same store and non-same store basis; however, each of our apartment communities generally has similar economic characteristics, residents, products and services. The Operating Partnership’s operating segments have been aggregated by geography in a manner identical to that which is provided to its chief operating decision maker.
          The Operating Partnership’s fee and asset management, development (including its partially owned properties), condominium conversion and corporate housing (Equity Corporate Housing or “ECH”) activities are immaterial and do not individually meet the threshold requirements of a reportable segment and as such, have been aggregated in the “Other” segment in the tables presented below.
          All revenues are from external customers and there is no customer who contributed 10% or more of the Operating Partnership’s total revenues during the nine months and quarters ended September 30,March 31, 2011 and 2010, and 2009, respectively.
          The primary financial measure for the Operating Partnership’s rental real estate segment is net operating income (“NOI”), which represents rental income less: 1) property and maintenance expense; 2) real estate taxes and insurance expense; and 3) property management expense (all as reflected in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations). The Operating Partnership believes that NOI is helpful to investors as a supplemental measure of theits operating performance of a real estate company because it is a direct measure of the actual operating results of the Operating Partnership’s apartment communities. Current year NOI is compared to prior year NOI and current year budgeted NOI as a measure of financial performance. The following tables present NOI for each segment from our rental real estate specific to continuing operations for the nine months and quarters ended September 30,March 31, 2011 and 2010, and 2009, respectively, as well as total assets at September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 (amounts in thousands):

25


                        
 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010                         
 Northeast Northwest Southeast Southwest Other (3) Total  Quarter Ended March 31, 2011 
              Northeast Northwest Southeast Southwest Other (3) Total 
Rental income:  
Same store (1) $442,774 $276,585 $293,921 $325,379 $ $1,338,659  $151,373 $88,893 $97,531 $110,150 $ $447,947 
Non-same store/other (2) (3) 73,979 10,272 6,323 19,924 68,145 178,643  28,474 8,061 4,787 7,313 22,235 70,870 
                          
Total rental income 516,753 286,857 300,244 345,303 68,145 1,517,302  179,847 96,954 102,318 117,463 22,235 518,817 
  
Operating expenses:  
Same store (1) 168,263 105,642 122,853 118,791  515,549  58,874 32,404 39,346 37,615  168,239 
Non-same store/other (2) (3) 37,055 4,330 2,795 8,071 54,757 107,008  11,967 3,379 1,867 3,135 18,175 38,523 
                          
Total operating expenses 205,318 109,972 125,648 126,862 54,757 622,557  70,841 35,783 41,213 40,750 18,175 206,762 
  
NOI:  
Same store (1) 274,511 170,943 171,068 206,588  823,110  92,499 56,489 58,185 72,535  279,708 
Non-same store/other (2) (3) 36,924 5,942 3,528 11,853 13,388 71,635  16,507 4,682 2,920 4,178 4,060 32,347 
                          
Total NOI $311,435 $176,885 $174,596 $218,441 $13,388 $894,745  $109,006 $61,171 $61,105 $76,713 $4,060 $312,055 
                          
  
Total assets $6,054,555 $2,723,175 $2,672,806 $3,141,662 $1,494,631 $16,086,829  $6,050,142 $2,623,015 $2,700,350 $3,194,880 $1,506,942 $16,075,329 
                          
 
(1) Same store primarily includes all properties acquired or completed and stabilized prior to January 1, 2009,2010, less properties subsequently sold, which represented 116,775112,363 apartment units.
 
(2) Non-same store primarily includes properties acquired after January 1, 2009,2010, plus any properties in lease-up and not stabilized as of January 1, 2009.2010.
 
(3) Other includes ECH, development, condominium conversion overhead of $0.4$0.1 million and other corporate operations. Also reflects a $8.0$2.4 million elimination of rental income recorded in Northeast, Northwest, Southeast and Southwest operating segments related to ECH.
                                                
 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009  Quarter Ended March 31, 2010 
 Northeast Northwest Southeast Southwest Other (3) Total  Northeast Northwest Southeast Southwest Other (3) Total 
Rental income:  
Same store (1) $439,673 $284,260 $295,435 $332,420 $ $1,351,788  $143,813 $84,971 $94,389 $107,500 $ $430,673 
Non-same store/other (2) (3) 13,369 1,283 3,144 12,299 51,982 82,077  12,057 1,464 1,699 1,062 15,622 31,904 
                          
Total rental income 453,042 285,543 298,579 344,719 51,982 1,433,865  155,870 86,435 96,088 108,562 15,622 462,577 
  
Operating expenses:  
Same store (1) 164,288 102,778 123,769 116,075  506,910  57,903 32,308 40,483 39,327  170,021 
Non-same store/other (2) (3) 8,126 1,358 1,303 6,685 53,735 71,207  5,622 754 826 854 18,193 26,249 
                          
Total operating expenses 172,414 104,136 125,072 122,760 53,735 578,117  63,525 33,062 41,309 40,181 18,193 196,270 
  
NOI:  
Same store (1) 275,385 181,482 171,666 216,345  844,878  85,910 52,663 53,906 68,173  260,652 
Non-same store/other (2) (3) 5,243  (75) 1,841 5,614  (1,753) 10,870  6,435 710 873 208  (2,571) 5,655 
                          
Total NOI $280,628 $181,407 $173,507 $221,959 $(1,753) $855,748  $92,345 $53,373 $54,779 $68,381 $(2,571) $266,307 
                          
 
(1) Same store primarily includes all properties acquired or completed and stabilized prior to January 1, 2009,2010, less properties subsequently sold, which represented 116,775112,363 apartment units.
 
(2) Non-same store primarily includes properties acquired after January 1, 2009,2010, plus any properties in lease-up and not stabilized as of January 1, 2009.2010.
 
(3) Other includes ECH, development, condominium conversion overhead of $1.6$0.2 million and other corporate operations. Also reflects a $7.4 million elimination of rental income recorded in Northeast, Northwest, Southeast and Southwest operating segments related to ECH.

26


                         
  Quarter Ended September 30, 2010 
  Northeast  Northwest  Southeast  Southwest  Other (3)  Total 
                   
Rental income:                        
Same store (1) $150,296  $93,705  $100,284  $109,775  $  $454,060 
Non-same store/other (2) (3)  28,740   5,351   1,810   7,612   27,655   71,168 
                   
Total rental income  179,036   99,056   102,094   117,387   27,655   525,228 
                         
Operating expenses:                        
Same store (1)  55,008   36,118   41,434   40,491      173,051 
Non-same store/other (2) (3)  17,242   2,146   903   2,685   19,563   42,539 
                   
Total operating expenses  72,250   38,264   42,337   43,176   19,563   215,590 
                         
NOI:                        
Same store (1)  95,288   57,587   58,850   69,284      281,009 
Non-same store/other (2) (3)  11,498   3,205   907   4,927   8,092   28,629 
                   
Total NOI $106,786  $60,792  $59,757  $74,211  $8,092  $309,638 
                   
(1)Same store primarily includes all properties acquired or completed and stabilized prior to July 1, 2009, less properties subsequently sold, which represented 117,286 units.
(2)Non-same store primarily includes properties acquired after July 1, 2009, plus any properties in lease-up and not stabilized as of July 1, 2009.
(3)Other includes ECH, development, condominium conversion overhead of $0.1 million and other corporate operations. Also reflects a $3.2 million elimination of rental income recorded in Northeast, Northwest, Southeast and Southwest operating segments related to ECH.
                         
  Quarter Ended September 30, 2009 
  Northeast  Northwest  Southeast  Southwest  Other (3)  Total 
                   
Rental income:                        
Same store (1) $146,157  $93,551  $98,961  $109,740  $  $448,409 
Non-same store/other (2) (3)  5,932   500      3,742   19,005   29,179 
                   
Total rental income  152,089   94,051   98,961   113,482   19,005   477,588 
                         
Operating expenses:                        
Same store (1)  53,287   35,377   41,530   39,621      169,815 
Non-same store/other (2) (3)  3,386   457   10   1,812   20,129   25,794 
                   
Total operating expenses  56,673   35,834   41,540   41,433   20,129   195,609 
                         
NOI:                        
Same store (1)  92,870   58,174   57,431   70,119      278,594 
Non-same store/other (2) (3)  2,546   43   (10)  1,930   (1,124)  3,385 
                   
Total NOI $95,416  $58,217  $57,421  $72,049  $(1,124) $281,979 
                   
(1)Same store primarily includes all properties acquired or completed and stabilized prior to July 1, 2009, less properties subsequently sold, which represented 117,286 units.
(2)Non-same store primarily includes properties acquired after July 1, 2009, plus any properties in lease-up and not stabilized as of July 1, 2009.
(3)Other includes ECH, development, condominium conversion overhead of $0.6 million and other corporate operations. Also reflects a $2.8$2.0 million elimination of rental income recorded in Northeast, Northwest, Southeast and Southwest operating segments related to ECH.
Note: Markets included in the above geographic segments are as follows:
(a) Northeast — New England (excluding Boston), Boston, New York Metro, DC Northern Virginia and Suburban Maryland.
 
(b) Northwest — Central Valley, Denver, Portland, San Francisco Bay Area and Seattle/Tacoma.
 
(c) Southeast — Atlanta, Jacksonville, Orlando, South Florida Tampa and Tulsa.Tampa.
 
(d) Southwest — Albuquerque, Inland Empire, Los Angeles, Orange County, Phoenix and San Diego.
          The following table presents a reconciliation of NOI from our rental real estate specific to continuing operations for the nine months and quarters ended September 30,March 31, 2011 and 2010, and 2009, respectively (amounts in thousands):

2726


                        
 Nine Months Ended September 30, Quarter Ended September 30,  Quarter Ended March 31, 
 2010 2009 2010 2009  2011 2010 
Rental income $1,517,302 $1,433,865 $525,228 $477,588  $518,817 $462,577 
Property and maintenance expense  (386,518)  (363,354)  (135,000)  (122,305)  (128,357)  (120,203)
Real estate taxes and insurance expense  (175,491)  (158,306)  (61,189)  (54,579)  (56,024)  (55,575)
Property management expense  (60,548)  (56,457)  (19,401)  (18,725)  (22,381)  (20,492)
              
Total operating expenses  (622,557)  (578,117)  (215,590)  (195,609)  (206,762)  (196,270)
              
Net operating income $894,745 $855,748 $309,638 $281,979  $312,055 $266,307 
              
16. Subsequent Events/Other
     Subsequent Events
          Subsequent to September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, the Operating Partnership:
  Repaid $75.2$193.7 million in mortgage loans;
 
  Redeemed its Series E and Series H Cumulative Convertible Preference Units for cash considerationObtained $91.5 million of $0.8 million and 355,581 OP Units (inclusive of any Preference Units converted after September 30, 2010 and prior to the redemption);new mortgage loan proceeds;
 
  Acquired one operating property containing 138consisting of 322 apartment units for $52.3$100.0 million and twoone land parcelsparcel for $14.6$12.9 million;
 
  Sold one property15 properties containing 1524,369 apartment units for $11.1$530.2 million; and
 
  FiledExercised the second of its two one-year extension options for its $500.0 million term loan facility and as a universal shelf registration statement for an unlimited amount of equity and debt securities for issuance by EQR andresult, the Operating Partnership that was automatically effective upon filing with the SEC inmaturity date is now October 2010 (under SEC regulations enacted in 2005, the registration statement automatically expires on October 14, 2013 and does not contain a maximum issuance amount).5, 2012.
     Other
          During the nine monthsquarters ended September 30,March 31, 2011 and 2010, and 2009, the Operating Partnership incurred charges of $6.0$0.5 million and $0.2$3.4 million, respectively, related to property acquisition costs, such as survey, title and legal fees, on the acquisition of operating properties and $3.5$1.7 million and $2.0$1.0 million, respectively, related to the write-off of various pursuit and out-of-pocket costs for terminated acquisition, disposition and development transactions. These costs, totaling $9.5$2.2 million and $2.2$4.4 million, respectively, are included in other expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
          During the nine monthsquarter ended September 30,March 31, 2010, and 2009, the Operating Partnership received $5.2$2.0 million and $0.2 million, respectively, for the settlement of insurance/litigation claims, which are included in interest and other income in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
          On July 16,In 2010, a portion of the parking garage collapsed at one of the Operating Partnership’s rental properties (Prospect Towers in Hackensack, New Jersey). The Operating Partnership estimates that the costs related to such collapse (both expensed and capitalized), including providing for residents’ interim needs, lost revenue and garage reconstruction, will be approximately $12.0$14.0 million, after insurance reimbursements of $8.0 million. Costs to rebuild the garage will beare capitalized as incurred. Other costs, like those to accommodate displaced residents, lost revenue due to a portion of the project being temporarily unavailable for occupancy and legal costs, will reduce earnings as they are incurred. Generally, insurance proceeds will beare recorded as increases to earnings as they are received. An impairment charge of $1.3 million was recognized to write-offDuring the net book value of the collapsed garage and an offsetting receivable was booked reflecting expected insurance recoveries. Subsequent to quarter-end,quarter ended March 31, 2011, the Operating Partnership received approximately $2.5$1.6 million in initial insurance proceeds. Expensesproceeds which offset expenses of $3.5$0.9 million that were recorded in the third quarter of 2010 relating to this loss and are included in real estate taxes and insurance on the consolidated statements of operations.
          During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Operating Partnership recorded an approximate $11.1 million non-cash asset impairment charge on a parcel of land held for development. This charge was the result of an analysis of the parcel’s estimated fair value (determined using internally developed models that were based on market assumptions and comparable sales data) compared to its current capitalized carrying value. The market assumptions used as inputs to the Operating Partnership’s fair value model include construction costs, leasing assumptions, growth rates, discount rates, terminal capitalization rates and development yields, along with the Operating Partnership’s current plans for each individual asset. The Operating Partnership uses data on its existing portfolio of properties and its recent acquisition and development properties, as well as similar market data from third party sources, when available, in determining these inputs.

2827


Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
          For further information including definitions for capitalized terms not defined herein, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Operating Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.2010.
Forward-Looking Statements
          Forward-looking statements in this report are intended to be made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on current expectations, estimates, projections and assumptions made by management. While the Operating Partnership’s management believes the assumptions underlying its forward-looking statements are reasonable, such information is inherently subject to uncertainties and may involve certain risks, which could cause actual results, performance or achievements of the Operating Partnership to differ materially from anticipated future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Many of these uncertainties and risks are difficult to predict and beyond management’s control. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, results or events. The forward-looking statements contained herein are made as of the date hereof and the Operating Partnership undertakes no obligation to update or supplement these forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such differences include, but are not limited to the following:
  We intend to actively acquire and/or develop multifamily properties for rental operations as market conditions dictate. We may also acquire multifamily properties that are unoccupied or in the early stages of lease up. We may be unable to lease up these apartment properties on schedule, resulting in decreases in expected rental revenues and/or lower yields due to lower occupancy and rates as well as higher than expected concessions. We may underestimate the costs necessary to bring an acquired property up to standards established for its intended market position or to complete a development property. Additionally, we expect that other major real estate investors with significant capital will compete with us for attractive investment opportunities or may also develop properties in markets where we focus our development efforts. This competition (or lack thereof) may increase or depress(or depress) prices for multifamily properties. We may not be in a position or have the opportunity in the future to make suitable property acquisitions on favorable terms. We expect to develop properties ourselves in addition to co-investing with our development partners. The total number of development apartment units, costs of development and estimated completion dates are subject to uncertainties arising from changing economic conditions (such as the cost of labor and construction materials), competition and local government regulation;
 
  Debt financing and other capital required by the Operating Partnership may not be available or may only be available on adverse terms;
 
  Labor and materials required for maintenance, repair, capital expenditure or development may be more expensive than anticipated;
 
  Occupancy levels and market rents may be adversely affected by national and local economic and market conditions including, without limitation, new construction and excess inventory of multifamily housing and single family housing, slow or negative employment growth, availability of low interest mortgages for single family home buyers and the potential for geopolitical instability, all of which are beyond the Operating Partnership’s control; and
 
  Additional factors as discussed in Part I of the Operating Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, particularly those under “Item 1A. Risk Factors”.
          Forward-looking statements and related uncertainties are also included in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.
Overview
          ERP Operating Limited Partnership (“ERPOP”), an Illinois limited partnership, was formed in May 1993 to conduct the multifamily residential property business of Equity Residential (“EQR”). EQR, a Maryland real estate investment trust (“REIT”) formed in March 1993, is an S&P 500 company focused on the acquisition, development and management of high quality apartment properties in top United States growth markets. EQR has elected to be taxed as a REIT.
          EQR is one of the largest publicly traded real estate companies and is the largest publicly traded owner of multifamily properties in the United States (based on the aggregate market value of its outstanding Common Shares, the number of apartment units wholly owned and total revenues earned). The Operating Partnership’s corporate

28


headquarters are located in Chicago, Illinois and the Operating Partnership also operates property management offices throughout the United States.in each of its markets. As of September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, the Operating Partnership hashad approximately 4,2004,000 employees who provideprovided real estate operations, leasing, legal, financial, accounting, acquisition, disposition, development and other

29


support functions.
          EQR is the general partner of, and as of September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 owned an approximate 95.3%95.5% ownership interest in ERPOP. EQR is structured as an umbrella partnership REIT (“UPREIT”) under which allAll of EQR’s property ownership, development and related business operations are conducted through ERPOP and its subsidiaries. References to the “Operating Partnership” include ERPOP and those entities owned or controlled by it. References to the “Company” mean EQR and the Operating Partnership.
Business Objectives and Operating Strategies
          The Operating Partnership seeksinvests in apartment communities located in strategically targeted markets with the goal of maximizing our risk adjusted total return (operating income plus capital appreciation) on invested capital.
          Our operating focus is on balancing occupancy and rental rates to maximize current income,our revenue while exercising tight cost control to generate the highest possible return to our shareholders. Revenue is maximized by driving qualified resident prospects to our properties, converting this traffic cost-effectively into new leases at the highest rent possible, keeping our residents satisfied and renewing their leases at yet higher rents. While we believe that it is our high-quality, well-located assets that bring our customers to us, it is our customer service that keeps them renting with us and recommending us to their friends.
          We use technology to engage our customers in the way that they want to be engaged. Many of our residents utilize our web-based resident portal which allows them to review their account and make payments, provide feedback and make service requests on-line.
          We seek to maximize capital appreciation of eachour properties by investing in markets that are characterized by conditions favorable to multifamily property and the total return for its shareholders. The Operating Partnership’s strategy for accomplishing these objectives includes:
Leveraging our size and scale in four critical ways:
Investing in apartment communities located in strategically targeted markets to maximize our total risk-adjusted return on invested capital;
Meeting the needs of our residents by offering a wide array of product choices and a commitment to service;
Engaging, retaining and attracting the best employees by providing them with the education, resources and opportunities to succeed; and
Sharing resources and best practices in property management across the enterprise.
Owning a highly diversified portfolio in our target markets. Targetappreciation. These markets are defined by a combinationgenerally feature one or more of the following criteria:
following:
  High barrier-to-entry marketsbarriers to entry where, because of land scarcity or government regulation, it is difficult or costly to build new apartment complexesproperties leading to low supply;
 
  Markets with highHigh single family housinghome prices making our apartments a more economical housing choice and allowing us to more readily increase rents;choice;
 
  Strong economic growth leading to household formation and job growth, which in turn leads to high demand for our apartments; and
 
  Markets with anAn attractive quality of life leading to high demand and retention.retention and allowing us to more readily increase rents.
Giving residents reasons to continue living in properties owned by the Operating Partnership by providing a range of product choices available in our diversified portfolio and by enhancing their experience with us through meticulous customer service by our employees and by providing various value-added services.
Being open and responsive to changes in the market in order to take advantage of investment opportunities that align with our long-term vision.
Acquisition, Development and Disposition Strategies
          The Operating Partnership anticipates that future property acquisitions, developments and dispositions will occur within the United States.          Acquisitions and developments may be financed from various sources of capital, which may include retained cash flow, issuance of additional equity and debt securities, sales of properties, joint venture agreements and collateralized and uncollateralized borrowings. In addition, the Operating Partnership may acquire properties in transactions that include the issuance of limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership (“OP Units”) as consideration for the acquired properties. Such transactions may, in certain circumstances, enable the sellers to defer, in whole or in part, the recognition of taxable income or gain that might otherwise result from the sales. ERPOP may also acquire land parcels to hold and/or sell based on market opportunities. The Operating Partnership may also seek to acquire properties by purchasing defaulted or distressed debt that encumbers desirable properties in the hope of obtaining title to property through foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure proceedings. The Operating Partnership has also, in the past, converted some of its properties and sold them as condominiums but is not currently active in this line of business.
          When evaluating potentialThe Operating Partnership primarily sources the funds for new property acquisitions developments and dispositions,in its core markets with the proceeds from selling assets that are older or located in non-core markets. Since 2006, the Operating Partnership generally considershas sold almost 100,000 apartment units for an aggregate sales price of approximately $7.5 billion and acquired nearly 25,000 apartment units in its core markets for approximately $5.6 billion. We are currently acquiring and developing assets primarily in the following factors:targeted metropolitan areas: Boston, New York, Washington DC, South Florida, Southern California, San Francisco, Seattle and to a lesser extent Denver. We also have investments (in the aggregate about 17.4% of our NOI at March 31, 2011) in other markets including Atlanta, Phoenix, Portland, Oregon, New England excluding Boston, Tampa, Orlando and Jacksonville but do not currently intend to acquire or develop assets in these markets.
strategically targeted markets;
income levels and employment growth trends in the relevant market;
employment and household growth and net migration in the relevant market’s population;
barriers to entry that would limit competition (zoning laws, building permit availability, supply of
          As part of its strategy, the Operating Partnership purchases completed and fully occupied apartment properties, partially completed or partially occupied properties or land on which apartment properties can be constructed. We intend to hold a diversified portfolio of assets across our target markets. As of March 31, 2011, no single

3029


undeveloped or developable real estate, local building costs and construction costs, among other factors);
the location, construction quality, age, condition and design of the property;
the current and projected cash flow of the property and the ability to increase cash flow;
the potential for capital appreciation of the property;
the terms of resident leases, including the potential for rent increases;
the potential for economic growth and the tax and regulatory environment of the community in which the property is located;
the occupancy and demand by residents for properties of a similar type in the vicinity (the overall market and submarket);
the prospects for liquidity through sale, financing or refinancing of the property;
the benefits of integration into existing operations;
purchase prices and yields of available existing stabilized properties, if any;
competition from existing multifamily properties, comparably priced single family homes or rentals, residential properties under development and the potential for the construction of new multifamily properties in the area; and
opportunistic selling based on demand and price of high quality assets.
metropolitan area accounted for more than 16.1% of our NOI, though no guarantee can be made that NOI concentration may not increase in the future.
          The Operating Partnership generally reinvestsWe endeavor to attract and retain the proceedsbest employees by providing them with the education, resources and opportunities to succeed. We provide many classroom and on-line training courses to assist our employees in interacting with prospects and residents as well as extensively train our customer service specialists in maintaining the equipment and appliances on our property sites. We actively promote from within and many senior corporate and property leaders have risen from entry level or junior positions. We monitor our employees’ engagement by surveying them annually and have consistently received fromhigh engagement scores.
          We have a commitment to sustainability and consider the environmental impacts of our business activities. With its high density, multifamily housing is, by its nature, an environmentally friendly property dispositionstype. Our recent acquisition and development activities have been primarily concentrated in pedestrian-friendly urban locations near public transportation. When developing and renovating our properties, we strive to achieve its acquisition, developmentreduce energy and rehab strategieswater usage by investing in energy saving technology while positively impacting the experience of our residents and the value of our assets. We continue to implement a combination of irrigation, lighting and HVAC improvements at times to fund its debt maturitiesour properties that will reduce energy and debt and equity repurchase activities. In addition, when feasible, the Operating Partnership may structure these transactions as tax-deferred exchanges.water consumption.
          Current Environment
          ThroughAfter much ofcaution in 2009 due to the Operating Partnership assumed a highly cautious outlook given uncertainty in the general economy and capital markets, late 2009 and early 2010 saw stabilization in the capital markets and deteriorationmodest improvements in our property operations.the general economy. Property occupancy began to improve and in response, the Operating Partnership began acquiring assets and increasing rents for both new and renewing residents, which led to better operating and investment performance. The Operating Partnership increased rents to a greater extent in regions like the Northeast, where the economy was stronger and multifamily operating conditions were better. In contrast, early 2010, seemedthe Operating Partnership ceased to warrant a cautious optimism given signs pointinghold the large cash balances (often $1.0 billion or more) that it held in 2009 in anticipation of debt maturities in an unsure capital markets climate. This had the result of increasing the Operating Partnership’s earnings by decreasing the amount of cash on hand that was earning limited interest income and instead was used to improvementpay down higher cost debt. Finally, the Operating Partnership was aggressive in economic activity, more normalized creditacquiring $1.5 billion of assets in its target markets in 2010.
          Improvement continued throughout 2010, and better fundamentals for our business. With the third quarter of 2010 showingin 2011 we expect strong growth in same store revenue growth over the third quarter of 2009, we(anticipated increases ranging from 4.0% to 5.0%) and NOI (anticipated increases ranging from 5.0% to 7.5%) and are optimistic that the improvement realized to date in 2010 will be sustained for the foreseeable future. While employment growthOur strong results in the first quarter of 2011, with same store revenues up 4.0% and same store NOI up 7.3% over the first quarter of 2010, now lead us to date has been relatively muted,believe that we believemay trend towards the higher end of these same store ranges for the year. Despite the anticipated improvement in operations, we still expect our full year Normalized Funds From Operations to fall near the midpoint of our guidance ranges due to increased household formation is providing added demand for rental apartments and supportingdilution from our occupancy and rental rate growth. Longer term, however, the rate of that growth remains highly dependent on both household formation and employment growth.accelerated dispositions (see further discussion below).
          The credit environment improved throughout mid to late 2009 and into 2010 and weWe currently have access to multiple sources of capital allowing us a less cautious posture with respect to pre-funding our maturing debt obligations. The Operating Partnership has access toincluding the equity markets as well as both the secured and unsecured debt markets. In July 2010, the Operating Partnership completed a $600.0 million unsecured ten year notesnote offering with a coupon of 4.75% and an all-in effective interest rate of 5.09%. The all-in rate combined withEQR also raised $291.9 million in equity under its accretive nature compared to maturing 2011 fixed rate debt led the Operating Partnership to pursue this transaction. The Operating Partnership has minimal debt maturities for the balance of 2010. However, should the improvement we are experiencing cease and economic conditions or credit/equity markets once again deteriorate, we may again hold material amounts of cash and prefund our maturities similar to measures taken in 2008 and early 2009 to increase liquidity and meet our debt maturities.
          Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2009, we began to see an increase in the availability of attractive acquisition opportunities. As a result, we expect to be a net buyer of assetsATM Common Share offering program in 2010 and has raised an additional $154.5 million under this program thus far in contrast2011.
          In response to beingwhat we believe is a net seller ofcurrent robust market and favorable pricing for our non-strategic assets, we have accelerated our disposition program in 2009. The Operating Partnership acquired 142011. Through April 28, 2011, we have sold 27 consolidated properties consisting of 4,1647,100 apartment units for $1.4$792.0 million. Based on the activity to date, the majority of our anticipated $1.25 billion and four land parcels for $54.3 million duringin 2011 dispositions will occur in the nine months ended September 30, 2010.first half of the year. While competitionthe accelerated disposition program will result in increased dilution (due to the lost NOI from sales proceeds that were not reinvested in other apartment properties) which will negatively impact Normalized Funds From Operations, we believe that we can maximize long-term returns to our shareholders by selling non-strategic assets at current pricing levels.
          Competition for the properties we are interested in acquiring increased in the second quarter of 2010is significant due to the overall improvement in market fundamentals and we were ableexpect a greater concentration of our 2011 acquisitions to close several, of what we believe are, long-term value added acquisition opportunities. Our acquisition pipeline is expected to moderateoccur in the fourth quarter of 2010 as compared to the pacelatter half of the first nine months of 2010.year. We believe our access to capital, our ability to execute large, complex transactions and our ability to efficiently stabilize large scale lease up properties provide us with a competitive advantage. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, theThe Operating Partnership sold 11acquired two consolidated properties consisting of 2,437521 apartment units for $172.0 million, and 27 unconsolidated properties consisting of 6,275 units generating cash proceeds to the Operating Partnership of $26.9 million, as well as 2 condominium units for $0.4$139.0 million and one land parcelcommercial building for $4.0 million. We expect to continue strategic dispositions and see an increase in dispositions inpotential redevelopment for $11.8 million during the fourth quarter of 2010 as we believe there is currently a robust market and pricing for certain of our non-strategic assets.ended March 31, 2011.
          We believe that cash and cash equivalents, securities readily convertible to cash, current availability on our revolving credit facility and disposition proceeds for 20102011 will provide sufficient liquidity to meet our funding

3130


obligations relating to asset acquisitions, debt maturities and existing development projects through 2010.2011. We expect that our remaining longer-term funding requirements will be met through some combination of new borrowings, equity issuances (including EQR’s ATM share offering program), property dispositions, joint ventures and cash generated from operations. There is significant uncertainty surrounding the futures of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Any changes to their mandates could have a significant impact on the Operating Partnership and may, among other things, lead to lower values for our disposition assets and higher interest rates on our borrowings. Such changes may also provide an advantage to us by making the cost of financing single family home ownership more expensive and provide us a competitive advantage given the size of our balance sheet and the multiple sources of capital to which we have access.
     Despite the challenging conditions noted below, weWe believe that the Operating Partnership is well-positioned notwithstanding the slow economic recovery. Ouras of March 31, 2011 because our properties are geographically diverse and were approximately 94.2%95.1% occupied (94.9%(95.0% on a same store basis) as of September 30, 2010,, little new multifamily rental supply will be added to most of our markets over the next several years and the long-term demographic picture is positive. We believe our strong balance sheet and ample liquidity will allow us to fund our debt maturities and development fundingscosts in the near term, and should also allow us to take advantage of investment opportunities in the future. As economic conditions continue to improve, the short-term nature of our leases and the limited supply of new rental housing being constructed should allow us to realize revenue growth and improvement in our operating results.
     While a generally improving credit environment and better general economic conditions provide reason for optimism, the Operating Partnership expects flat to slightly declining revenues for the full year 2010, which will adversely impact the Operating Partnership’s results of operations. The vast majority of our leases are for terms of 12 months or less. Given the roll-down in lease rates that occurred throughout 2009, the full year comparison to 2010 will continue to show flat to declining revenue, even though the Operating Partnership experienced same store revenue increases in the third quarter of 2010 when compared to the third quarter of 2009 for the first time since the fourth quarter of 2008 and expects similar results in the fourth quarter of 2010 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2009. Net effective new lease rates are positive and new residents are generally occupying units at higher rent than the vacating resident was previously paying. Our revenues have benefited from high resident retention, which has generally increased more significantly than expected, and our occupancy rates, which increased more quickly than expected. The depressed demand for single family housing and employment uncertainty are clear drivers of our resident retention and occupancy.
The Operating Partnership anticipates that 20102011 same store expenses will only increase 1.5%1.0% to 2.0% primarily due to increasedmodest increases in payroll expenses, related to workers compensation, health insurance and bonus accrual increases, partially offset by favorable real estate tax valuationrates and appeals results and modest utility cost growth (same store expenses increased 1.7%0.9% for the first nine months of 2010 when compared with the same period in the prior year). This follows three consecutive years of excellent expense control (same store expenses declined 0.1% between 2009 and 2008 and grew 2.2% between 2008 and 2007 and 2.1% between 2007 and 2006). However,Effective expense controls continued in the combinationfirst quarter of expected flat2011 as same store expenses declined 1.0% as compared to declining revenuesthe first quarter of 2010. The Operating Partnership now anticipates that its same store expenses will trend towards the lower end of its guidance range.
     The current environment information presented above is based on current expectations and moderately increasing expense levels will have a negative impact on the Operating Partnership’s results of operations for 2010.is forward-looking.
Results of Operations
     In conjunction with our business objectives and operating strategy, the Operating Partnership continued to invest in apartment properties located in strategically targeted markets during the nine monthsquarter ended September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 as follows:
Acquired $1.0 billion of apartment properties consisting of 12 properties and 2,926 units at a weighted average capitalization (“cap”) rate (see definition below) of 5.5% and four land parcels for $54.3 million, all of which we deem to be in our strategic targeted markets;
Acquired one unoccupied property in the second quarter of 2010 (425 Mass) for $166.8 million consisting of 559 units that is expected to stabilize in its third year of ownership at an 8.5% yield on cost and one property in the third quarter of 2010 (Vantage Pointe) for $200.0 million consisting of 679 units that was in the early stages of lease up and is expected to stabilize in its third year of ownership at a 7.0% yield on cost;
Acquired the 75% equity interest it did not own in seven previously unconsolidated properties consisting of 1,811 units at an implied cap rate of 8.4% in exchange for an approximate $30.0 million payment to its joint venture partner;
Sold $172.0 million of consolidated apartment properties consisting of 11 properties and 2,437 units at a weighted average cap rate of 7.5%, 2 condominium units for $0.4 million and one land parcel for $4.0 million, the majority of which was in exit or less desirable markets; and
Sold the last of its 25% equity interests in an institutional joint venture consisting of 27 unconsolidated properties containing 6,275 apartment units. These properties were valued in their entirety at $417.8 million which results in an implied weighted average cap rate of 7.5% (generating cash to the Operating Partnership, net of debt repayments, of $26.9 million).
Acquired $139.0 million of apartment properties consisting of two consolidated properties and 521 apartment units at a weighted average cap rate (see definition below) of 5.7%, both of which we deem to be in our strategic targeted markets;
Acquired a 97,000 square foot commercial building adjacent to our Harbor Steps apartment property in downtown Seattle for $11.8 million for potential redevelopment; and
Sold $261.8 million of consolidated apartment properties consisting of 12 properties and 2,731 apartment units at a weighted average cap rate of 6.7%, the majority of which was in exit or less desirable markets.
     The Operating Partnership’s primary financial measure for evaluating each of its apartment communities is net

32


operating income (“NOI”). NOI represents rental income less property and maintenance expense, real estate tax and insurance expense and property management expense. The Operating Partnership believes that NOI is helpful to investors as a supplemental measure of theits operating performance of a real estate company because it is a direct measure of the actual operating results of the Operating Partnership’s apartment communities. The cap rate is generally the first year NOI yield (net of replacements) on the Operating Partnership’s investment.
     Properties that the Operating Partnership owned for all of both of the nine monthsquarters ended September 30,March 31, 2011 and 2010 and 2009 (the “Nine-Month 2010“First Quarter 2011 Same Store Properties”), which represented 116,775 units, and properties that the Operating Partnership owned for all of both of the quarters ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (the “Third Quarter 2010 Same Store Properties”), which represented 117,286112,363 apartment units, impacted the Operating Partnership’s results of operations. Both the Nine-Month 2010 Same Store Properties and the ThirdThe First Quarter 20102011 Same Store Properties are discussed in the following paragraphs.
     The Operating Partnership’s acquisition, disposition and completed development activities also impacted overall results of operations for the nine months and quarters ended September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 and 2009. Dilution, as a result of the Operating Partnership’s net asset sales last year, partially offset by net asset acquisitions and lease up activity in the current year, negatively impacts property net operating income.2010. The impacts of these activities are discussed in greater detail in the following paragraphs.
Comparison of the nine monthsquarter ended September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 to the nine monthsquarter ended September 30, 2009March 31, 2010
     For the nine monthsquarter ended September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, the Operating Partnership reported diluted earnings per Unit of $0.29$0.42 compared to $1.12$0.18 per Unit in the same period of 2009.2010. The difference is primarily due to lowerhigher gains from property sales in 2011 vs. 2010 and lowerhigher total property net operating income driven by lower the positive impact of the Operating Partnership’s

31


same store NOI and lease-up activity, partially offset by dilution from the Operating Partnership’s 20092010 and 2011 transaction activity, partially offset by the positive impact of NOI from 2010 transaction and lease-up activity.
     For the nine monthsquarter ended September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, income from continuing operations decreasedincreased approximately $6.3$17.1 million or 19.1% when compared to the nine monthsquarter ended September 30, 2009.March 31, 2010. The decreaseincrease in continuing operations is discussed below.
     Revenues from the Nine-Month 2010First Quarter 2011 Same Store Properties decreased $13.1increased $17.3 million primarily as a result of a decreasean increase in average rental rates charged to residents, partially offset by an increase in occupancy.occupancy and a decrease in resident turnover. Expenses from the Nine-Month 2010First Quarter 2011 Same Store Properties increased $8.6decreased $1.8 million primarily due to increasesdecreases in repairs and maintenance expenses (mostly due to greater storm-relatedand on-site payroll costs, such as snow removal and roof repairs incurred during the first quarter of 2010), higher property management costs andpartially offset by increases in on-site payrollproperty management costs. The following tables provide comparative same store results and statistics for the Nine-Month 2010First Quarter 2011 Same Store Properties:
September YTDFirst Quarter 2011 vs. First Quarter 2010 vs. September YTD 2009
Same Store Results/Statistics
$ in thousands (except for Average Rental Rate) — 116,775– 112,363 Same Store Apartment Units
                                                
 Results Statistics  Results Statistics 
 Average      Average     
 Rental      Rental     
Description Revenues Expenses NOI Rate (1) Occupancy  Turnover  Revenues Expenses NOI Rate (1) Occupancy Turnover 
YTD 2010 $1,338,659 $515,549 $823,110 $1,344  94.9%  43.7%
YTD 2009 $1,351,788 $506,910 $844,878 $1,375  93.7%  47.2%
Q1 2011 $447,947 $168,239 $279,708 $1,400  95.0%  11.6%
Q1 2010 $430,673 $170,021 $260,652 $1,352  94.6%  11.8%
                           
Change $(13,129) $8,639 $(21,768) $(31)  1.2%  (3.5%) $17,274 $(1,782) $19,056 $48  0.4%  (0.2%)
                           
Change  (1.0%)  1.7%   (2.6%)  (2.3%)   4.0%  (1.0%)  7.3%  3.6% 
 
(1) Average rental rate is defined as total rental revenues divided by the weighted average occupied apartment units for the period.
     The following table provides comparative same store operating expenses for the Nine-Month 2010First Quarter 2011 Same Store Properties:

33


September YTD 2010First Quarter 2011 vs. September YTD 2009First Quarter 2010
Same Store Operating Expenses
$ in thousands — 116,775– 112,363 Same Store Apartment Units
                                        
 % of Actual % of Actual 
 YTD 2010 Q1 2011 
 Actual Actual $ % Operating Actual Actual $ % Operating 
 YTD 2010 YTD 2009 Change Change Expenses Q1 2011 Q1 2010 Change Change Expenses 
Real estate taxes $135,169 $137,170 $(2,001)  (1.5%)  26.2% $44,613 $44,445 $168  0.4%  26.5%
On-site payroll (1) 125,363 122,276 3,087  2.5%   24.3% 39,757 40,453  (696)  (1.7%)  23.6%
Utilities (2) 80,692 79,099 1,593  2.0%   15.7% 28,285 27,752 533  1.9%  16.8%
Repairs and maintenance (3) 77,346 74,262 3,084  4.2%  15.0% 23,501 25,034  (1,533)  (6.1%)  14.0%
Property management costs (4) 53,814 50,016 3,798  7.6%   10.4% 18,097 17,227 870  5.1%  10.8%
Insurance 16,785 16,774 11  0.1%   3.3% 5,256 5,571  (315)  (5.7%)  3.1%
Leasing and advertising 11,823 12,240  (417)  (3.4%)  2.3% 3,218 3,802  (584)  (15.4%)  1.9%
Other operating expenses (5) 14,557 15,073  (516)  (3.4%)  2.8%
Other on-site operating expenses (5) 5,512 5,737  (225)  (3.9%)  3.3%
                        
Same store operating expenses $515,549 $506,910 $8,639  1.7%   100.0% $168,239 $170,021 $(1,782)  (1.0%)  100.0%
                       
 
(1) On-site payroll Includes payroll and related expenses for on-site personnel including property managers, leasing consultants and maintenance staff.
 
(2) Utilities Represents gross expenses prior to any recoveries under the Resident Utility Billing System (“RUBS”). Recoveries are reflected in rental income.
 
(3) Repairs and maintenance Includes general maintenance costs, apartment unit turnover costs including interior painting, routine landscaping, security, exterminating, fire protection, snow removal, elevator, roof and parking lot repairs and other miscellaneous building repair costs.
 
(4) Property management costs Includes payroll and related expenses for departments, or portions of departments, that directly support on-site management. These include such departments as regional and corporate property management, property accounting, human resources, training, marketing and revenue management, procurement, real estate tax, property legal services and information technology.

32


(5) Other on-site operating expenses Includes administrative costs such as office supplies, telephone and data charges and association and business licensing fees.
     The following table presents a reconciliation of operating income per the consolidated statements of operations to NOI for the Nine-Month 2010First Quarter 2011 Same Store Properties:
                
 Nine Months Ended September 30,  Quarter Ended March 31, 
 2010 2009  2011 2010 
 (Amounts in thousands)  (Amounts in thousands) 
Operating income $366,769 $387,409  $133,510 $110,008 
Adjustments:  
Non-same store operating results  (71,635)  (10,870)  (32,347)  (5,655)
Fee and asset management revenue  (7,596)  (7,928)  (1,806)  (2,422)
Fee and asset management expense 4,364 5,916  948 1,958 
Depreciation 500,173 428,751  167,968 146,042 
General and administrative 31,035 30,476  11,435 10,721 
Impairment  11,124 
          
  
Same store NOI $823,110 $844,878  $279,708 $260,652 
          
     For properties that the Operating Partnership acquired prior to January 1, 20092010 and expects to continue to own through December 31, 2010,2011, the Operating Partnership anticipates the following same store results for the full year ending December 31, 2010:2011:
     
20102011 Same Store Assumptions
Physical occupancy  94.995.0%
Revenue change (0.25%)4.0% to 5.0%
Expense change 1.50%1.0% to 2.0%
NOI change (1.25%)5.0% to 7.5%

34


     The Operating Partnership anticipates consolidated rental acquisitions of $1.5$1.0 billion and consolidated rental dispositions of $750.0 million$1.25 billion and expects that acquisitions will have a capitalization1.25% lower cap rate spread of 110 basis pointsthan dispositions for the full year ending December 31, 2010.2011.
     These 20102011 assumptions are based on current expectations and are forward-looking.
     Non-same store operating results increased approximately $60.8$26.7 million and consist primarily of properties acquired in calendar years 20092010 and 2010,2011, as well as operations from the Operating Partnership’s completed development properties and corporate housing business. WhileAlthough the operations of both the non-same store assets and the same store assets have been negativelypositively impacted during the nine monthsquarter ended September 30, 2010 similar to the same store assets,March 31, 2011, the non-same store assets have contributed a greater percentage of total NOI to the Operating Partnership’s overall operating results primarily due to 2010 acquisitions, increasing occupancy for properties in lease-up and a longer ownership period in 20102011 than 2009.2010. This increase primarily resulted from:
Development and other miscellaneous properties in lease-up of $25.3 million;
Newly stabilized development and other miscellaneous properties of $2.6 million;
Properties acquired in 2009 and 2010 of $37.6 million; and
Partially offset by an allocation of property management costs not included in same store results and operating activities from other miscellaneous operations, such as the Operating Partnership’s corporate housing business.
Development and other miscellaneous properties in lease-up of $9.3 million;
Properties acquired in 2010 and 2011 of $13.4 million;
Newly stabilized development properties of $1.0 million; and
Partially offset by other miscellaneous properties of $1.1 million.
     See also Note 15 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion regarding the Operating Partnership’s segment disclosures.
     Fee and asset management revenues, net of fee and asset management expenses, increased approximately $1.2$0.4 million or 60.6%84.9% primarily due to an increasea decrease in revenue earned onasset management expenses, partially offset by the loss of fees due to the Operating Partnership’s military housingunwinding of four institutional joint ventures at Fort Lewis and McChord Air Force Base.during 2010.
     Property management expenses from continuing operations include off-site expenses associated with the self-management of the Operating Partnership’s properties as well as management fees paid to any third party management companies. These expenses increased approximately $4.1$1.9 million or 7.2%9.2%. This increase is primarily attributable to an increase in payroll-related costs, (due primarily to higher workers compensation, health insurance and bonus accrual costs), legal and professional fees, education/conference expenses and real estate tax consulting fees.which is largely a result of

33


the creation of the Operating Partnership’s central business group, which moved certain administrative functions off-site.
     Depreciation expense from continuing operations, which includes depreciation on non-real estate assets, increased approximately $71.4$21.9 million or 16.7%15.0% primarily as a result of additional depreciation expense on properties acquired in 20092010 and 2010,2011, development properties placed in service and capital expenditures for all properties owned.
     General and administrative expenses from continuing operations, which include corporate operating expenses, increased approximately $0.6$0.7 million or 1.8%6.7% primarily due to higheran increase in payroll-related costs, (due primarily to higher workerswhich is largely a result of the acceleration of long-term compensation health insurance and bonus accrual costs).expense for retirement eligible employees. The Operating Partnership anticipates that general and administrative expenses will approximate $41.0$40.0 million to $42.0 million for the year ending December 31, 2010.2011. The above assumption is based on current expectations and is forward-looking.
     Impairment from continuing operations decreased approximately $11.1 million due to an impairment charge on land held for development taken during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 that did not reoccur in 2010. See Note 16 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
Interest and other income from continuing operations decreased approximately $10.5$1.2 million or 66.4%56.2% primarily as a result of a decreaseinsurance/litigation settlement proceeds that occurred in interest earned on cash and cash equivalents and investment securities due to lower interest rates during the nine monthsquarter ended September 30,March 31, 2010 and lower overall balances as well as gains on debt extinguishment recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 that did not reoccur in 2010,the quarter ended March 31, 2011, partially offset by an increase in insurance/litigation settlement proceeds.forfeited deposits for terminated disposition transactions. The Operating Partnership anticipates that interest and other income will approximate $5.0$2.0 million to $6.0$3.0 million for the year ending December 31, 2010.2011. The above assumption is based on current expectations and is forward-looking.
     Other expenses from continuing operations increaseddecreased approximately $7.3$2.2 million or 50.6% primarily due to an increase in pursuit cost write-offs as a result of the Operating Partnership’s decision to reduce its development activities in prior periods as well as an increasedecrease in property acquisition costs incurred in conjunction with the Operating Partnership’s significantly higherlower acquisition volume. The Operating Partnership anticipates that other expenses will approximate $11.0 million to $12.0 million forvolume in 2011, partially offset by an increase in the year ending December 31, 2010. The above assumption is basedexpensing of overhead (pursuit cost write-offs) as a result of a more active focus on current expectations and is forward looking.sourcing new development opportunities.

35


     Interest expense from continuing operations, including amortization of deferred financing costs, decreasedincreased approximately $7.7$7.3 million or 2.1% primarily6.2% as a result of lower overall debt balances due to the significant debt repurchases in 2009 and lower rates, partially offset by interest expense on the $500.0 million mortgage pool that closed in June 2009, the $600.0 million of unsecured notes that closed in July 2010 and lower capitalized interest.interest, partially offset by a decrease in financing fees. During the nine monthsquarter ended September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, the Operating Partnership capitalized interest costs of approximately $10.2$1.7 million as compared to $28.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. This capitalization of interest primarily relates to consolidated projects under development. The effective interest cost on all indebtedness for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was 5.14% as compared to 5.38% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The Operating Partnership anticipates that interest expense will approximate $476.3 million to $481.1 million for the year ending December 31, 2010. The above assumption is based on current expectations and is forward-looking.
          Income and other tax expense from continuing operations decreased approximately $2.5 million or 89.1% primarily due to a decrease in franchise taxes for Texas and Tennessee as well as a decrease in business taxes for Washington, D.C. The Operating Partnership anticipates that income and other tax expense will approximate $1.0 million for the year ending December 31, 2010. The above assumption is based on current expectations and is forward-looking.
          Loss from investments in unconsolidated entities decreased approximately $1.6 million or 69.0% as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2009 primarily due to the Operating Partnership’s $1.8 million share of defeasance costs incurred in conjunction with the extinguishment of cross-collateralized mortgage debt on one of the Operating Partnership’s partially owned unconsolidated joint ventures taken during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 that did not reoccur in 2010.
          Net gain on sales of unconsolidated entities increased approximately $21.4 million primarily due to larger gains on sale and revaluation of seven previously unconsolidated properties that were acquired from the Operating Partnership’s joint venture partner and the gain on sale for 27 properties sold during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared with unconsolidated properties sold in the same period in 2009.
          Net loss on sales of land parcels increased approximately $1.2 million primarily due to the loss on sale of one land parcel during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
          Discontinued operations, net decreased approximately $230.6 million or 76.5% between the periods under comparison. This decrease is primarily due to lower gains from property sales during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 and the operations of those properties. In addition, properties sold reflect operations for none of or a partial period in 2010 in contrast to a full or partial period in 2009. See Note 13 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
Comparison of the quarter ended September 30, 2010 to the quarter ended September 30, 2009
          For the quarter ended September 30, 2010, the Operating Partnership reported diluted earnings per Unit of $0.09 compared to $0.48 per Unit in the same period of 2009. The difference is primarily due to lower gains from property sales in 2010 and lower total property net operating income driven by dilution from the Operating Partnerships 2009 transaction activity and lower interest and other income, partially offset by the positive impact of NOI from 2010 transaction and lease-up activity and higher same store NOI.
          For the quarter ended September 30, 2010, income from continuing operations increased approximately $10.9 million when compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2009. The increase in continuing operations is discussed below.
          Revenues from the Third Quarter 2010 Same Store Properties increased $5.7 million primarily as a result of a decrease in resident turnover and an increase in occupancy. Expenses from the Third Quarter 2010 Same Store Properties increased $3.2 million primarily due to increases in property management costs, on-site payroll costs and repairs and maintenance costs, partially offset by lower real estate taxes. The following tables provide comparative same store results and statistics for the Third Quarter 2010 Same Store Properties:

36


Third Quarter 2010 vs. Third Quarter 2009
Same Store Results/Statistics
$ in thousands (except for Average Rental Rate) — 117,286 Same Store Units
                         
  Results  Statistics 
              Average       
              Rental       
Description Revenues  Expenses  NOI  Rate (1)  Occupancy Turnover
Q3 2010 $454,060  $173,051  $281,009  $1,360   95.0%  17.6% 
Q3 2009 $448,409  $169,815  $278,594  $1,362   93.7%  18.5% 
                   
Change $5,651  $3,236  $2,415  $(2)  1.3%  (0.9%)
                   
Change  1.3%   1.9%   0.9%   (0.1%)        
(1)Average rental rate is defined as total rental revenues divided by the weighted average occupied units for the period.
     The following table provides comparative same store operating expenses for the Third Quarter 2010 Same Store Properties:
Third Quarter 2010 vs. Third Quarter 2009
Same Store Operating Expenses
$ in thousands — 117,286 Same Store Units
                     
                  % of Actual
                  Q3 2010
  Actual  Actual  $  %  Operating
  Q3 2010  Q3 2009  Change  Change  Expenses
Real estate taxes $43,973  $45,936  $(1,963)  (4.3%)  25.4%
On-site payroll (1)  42,324   40,414   1,910   4.7%   24.4%
Utilities (2)  26,954   26,050   904   3.5%   15.6%
Repairs and maintenance (3)  26,974   25,866   1,108   4.3%   15.6%
Property management costs (4)  18,253   16,591   1,662   10.0%   10.5%
Insurance  5,637   5,634   3   0.1%   3.3%
Leasing and advertising  4,460   4,694   (234)  (5.0%)  2.6%
Other operating expenses (5)  4,476   4,630   (154)  (3.3%)  2.6%
                
Same store operating expenses $173,051  $169,815  $3,236   1.9%   100.0%
                
(1)On-site payroll — Includes payroll and related expenses for on-site personnel including property managers, leasing consultants and maintenance staff.
(2)Utilities — Represents gross expenses prior to any recoveries under the Resident Utility Billing System (“RUBS”). Recoveries are reflected in rental income.
(3)Repairs and maintenance — Includes general maintenance costs, unit turnover costs including interior painting, routine landscaping, security, exterminating, fire protection, snow removal, elevator, roof and parking lot repairs and other miscellaneous building repair costs.
(4)Property management costs — Includes payroll and related expenses for departments, or portions of departments, that directly support on-site management. These include such departments as regional and corporate property management, property accounting, human resources, training, marketing and revenue management, procurement, real estate tax, property legal services and information technology.
(5)Other operating expenses — Includes administrative costs such as office supplies, telephone and data charges and association and business licensing fees.
     The following table presents a reconciliation of operating income per the consolidated statements of operations to NOI for the Third Quarter 2010 Same Store Properties:

37


         
  Quarter Ended September 30, 
  2010  2009 
  (Amounts in thousands) 
Operating income $127,196  $128,655 
Adjustments:        
Non-same store operating results  (28,629)  (3,385)
Fee and asset management revenue  (2,128)  (2,653)
Fee and asset management expense  704   1,931 
Depreciation  173,642   144,165 
General and administrative  10,224   9,881 
       
         
Same store NOI $281,009  $278,594 
       
          Non-same store operating results increased approximately $25.2 million and consist primarily of properties acquired in calendar years 2009 and 2010, as well as operations from the Operating Partnership’s completed development properties and corporate housing business. The non-same store assets have contributed a greater percentage of total NOI to the Operating Partnership’s overall operating results primarily due to increasing occupancy for properties in lease-up and a longer ownership period in 2010 than 2009. This increase primarily resulted from:
Development and other miscellaneous properties in lease-up of $9.3 million;
Properties acquired in 2009 and 2010 of $16.7 million; and
Partially offset by an allocation of property management costs not included in same store results and operating activities from other miscellaneous operations, such as the Operating Partnership’s corporate housing business.
          See also Note 15 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion regarding the Operating Partnership’s segment disclosures.
          Fee and asset management revenues, net of fee and asset management expenses, increased approximately $0.7 million primarily due to an increase in revenue earned on management of the Operating Partnership’s military housing ventures at Fort Lewis and McChord Air Force Base.
          Property management expenses from continuing operations include off-site expenses associated with the self-management of the Operating Partnership’s properties as well as management fees paid to any third party management companies. These expenses increased approximately $0.7 million or 3.6%. This increase is primarily attributable to an increase in real estate tax consulting expense, education/conference expenses and travel expenses.
          Depreciation expense from continuing operations, which includes depreciation on non-real estate assets, increased approximately $29.5 million or 20.4% primarily as a result of additional depreciation expense on properties acquired in 2009 and 2010, development properties placed in service and capital expenditures for all properties owned.
          General and administrative expenses from continuing operations, which include corporate operating expenses, increased approximately $0.3 million or 3.5% primarily due to an increase in payroll-related costs.
          Interest and other income from continuing operations decreased approximately $3.0 million or 93.5% primarily as a result of a decrease in interest earned on cash and cash equivalents and investment securities due to lower interest rates during the quarter ended September 30, 2010 and lower overall balances, as well as a gain on debt extinguishment recognized during the quarter ended September 30, 2009 that did not reoccur in 2010.
          Other expenses from continuing operations increased approximately $1.6 million primarily due to an increase in property acquisition costs incurred in conjunction with the Operating Partnership’s significantly higher acquisition volume.
          Interest expense from continuing operations, including amortization of deferred financing costs, increased approximately $1.0 million or 0.8% as a result of an increase in interest expense related to the $600.0 million unsecured notes entered into during the quarter ended September 30, 2010 which was offset by a decrease in capitalized interest, significant debt repurchases and write-offs in 2009 and lower rates. During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, the Operating Partnership capitalized interest costs of approximately $2.3 million as compared to $7.7$4.4 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2009.March 31, 2010. This capitalization of interest primarily relates to consolidated projects under development. The effective interest cost on all indebtedness for the quarter ended September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 was 5.15%5.13% as compared to 5.38%5.22% for the quarter ended September 30, 2009.March 31, 2010.

38


     Income and other tax expense from continuing operations decreased approximately $0.2was consistent between the periods under comparison. The Operating Partnership anticipates that income and other tax expense will approximate $0.5 million or 36.2% primarily due to a decrease in franchise taxes$1.5 million for Texas.the year ending December 31, 2011. The above assumption is based on current expectations and is forward-looking.
     Income/lossLoss from investments in unconsolidated entities increaseddecreased approximately $0.3$0.5 million as compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2009March 31, 2010 primarily due to distributions from entities for which the Operating Partnership no longer had any basis, as well as greater operating lossesunwinding of four institutional joint ventures during the quarter ended September 30, 2009.2010.
     Net gain on sales of unconsolidated entities increaseddecreased approximately $18.6$0.5 million primarily due to the gain on sale of 24 previouslyfor two unconsolidated properties that were sold toduring the Operating Partnership’s joint venture partner.
          Net loss on sales of land parcels increased approximately $1.2 million primarily due to the loss on sale of one land parcel during quarter ended September 30, 2010.March 31, 2010 that did not reoccur during the quarter ended March 31, 2011.
     Discontinued operations, net decreasedincreased approximately $124.4$58.1 million or 92.6%86.3% between the periods under comparison. This decreaseincrease is primarily a result of fewer consolidateddue to higher gains from property sales during the quarter ended September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 compared to the same period in 2009. In addition,2010, partially offset by properties sold in 2011 which reflect operations for none of or a partial period in 20102011 in contrast to a full or partial period in 2009.2010. See Note 13 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
     As of January 1, 2010,2011, the Operating Partnership had approximately $193.3$431.4 million of cash and cash equivalents, its restricted 1031 exchange proceeds totaled $244.3$103.9 million and it had $1.37$1.28 billion available under its revolving credit facility (net of $56.7$147.3 million which was restricted/dedicated to support letters of credit and $75.0 million which had been committed by a now bankrupt financial institution and is not available for borrowing). After taking into effect the various transactions discussed in the following paragraphs and the net cash provided by operating activities, the Operating Partnership’s cash and cash equivalents balance at September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 was approximately $43.7$306.1 million, its restricted 1031 exchange proceeds totaled

34


$212.8 million and the amount available on the Operating Partnership’s revolving credit facility was $1.2$1.34 billion (net of $84.3$83.7 million which was restricted/dedicated to support letters of credit net of $146.0 million outstanding and net of the $75.0 million discussed above).
     During the nine monthsquarter ended September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, the Operating Partnership generated proceeds from various transactions, which included the following:
  Disposed of 1112 consolidated properties, 27 unconsolidated properties, 2 condominium units and one land parcel, receiving net proceeds of approximately $161.5$258.2 million;
 
  Obtained $124.0$0.7 million in new mortgage financing; and
Issued approximately 4.2 million Units (including EQR Common Shares issued under EQR’s ATM program – see further discussion below) and received net proceeds of $190.0 million.
     During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, the above proceeds were primarily utilized to:
Acquire two rental properties and a 97,000 square foot commercial building for approximately $123.9 million;
 
  Issued $600.0Invest $29.8 million of unsecured notes receiving net proceeds of $595.4 million before underwriting fees and other expenses;primarily in development projects; and
 
  Issued approximately 3.2 million Units and received net proceeds of $98.0 million.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the above proceeds were primarily utilized to:
Acquire 14 rental properties and four land parcels for approximately $1.1 billion;
Acquire the 75% equity interest it did not own in seven previously unconsolidated properties consisting of 1,811 units in exchange for an approximate $26.9 million payment to its joint venture partner (net of $3.1 million in cash acquired);
Invest $98.3 million primarily in development projects;
Repurchase 58,130 OP Units, utilizing cash of $1.9 million (see Note 3);
Repay $503.6$205.0 million of mortgage loans;loans and
Settle a forward starting swap, utilizing cash $93.1 million of $10.0 million.unsecured notes.
     In September 2009, EQR announced the establishment of an At-The-Market (“ATM”) share offering program which would allow EQR to sell up to 17.0 million Common Shares from time to time over the next three years into the existing trading market at current market prices as well as through negotiated transactions. Per the terms of ERPOP’s partnership agreement, EQR contributes the net proceeds from all equity offerings to the capital of the Operating Partnership in exchange for additional OP Units (on a one-for-one Common Share per OP Unit basis). EQR may, but shall have no obligation to, sell Common Shares through the ATM share offering program in amounts and at times to be determined by EQR. Actual sales will depend on a variety of factors to be determined by EQR from time to time, including (among others) market conditions, the trading price of EQR’s Common Shares and determinations of the appropriate sources of funding for EQR. During the nine monthsquarter ended September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, EQR issued approximately

39


1.1 3.0 million Common Shares at an average price of $33.87$50.84 per share for total consideration of approximately $35.8$154.5 million through the ATM share offering program. Cumulative to date, EQR has not issued any shares under this program since January 13, 2011. Through April 28, 2011, EQR has cumulatively issued approximately 4.612.7 million Common Shares at an average price of $35.03$44.94 per share for total consideration of approximately $159.5$570.1 million. Including its February 2011 prospectus supplement which added approximately 5.7 million Common Shares, EQR has 12.410.0 million Common Shares remaining available for issuance under the ATM program.program as of March 31, 2011.
     Depending on its analysis of market prices, economic conditions and other opportunities for the investment of available capital, EQR may repurchase its Common Shares pursuant to its existing share repurchase program authorized by the Board of Trustees. EQR repurchased $1.9 million (58,130 shares at an average price per share of $32.46) of its Common Shares during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Concurrent with these transactions, the Operating Partnership repurchased and retired 58,130 OP Units previously issued to EQR. As of September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, EQR had authorization to repurchase an additional $464.6 million of its shares. See Note 3 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
     Depending on its analysis of prevailing market conditions, liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors, the Operating Partnership may from time to time seek to repurchase and retire its outstanding debt in open market or privately negotiated transactions.
     The Operating Partnership’s total debt summary and debt maturity schedules as of September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 are as follows:

35


Debt Summary as of September 30, 2010March 31, 2011
(Amounts in thousands)
                                
 Weighted  Weighted 
 Weighted Average  Weighted Average 
 Average Maturities  Average Maturities 
 Amounts (1) % of Total Rates (1) (years)  Amounts (1) % of Total Rates (1) (years) 
Secured $4,845,244  47.6%  4.84% 8.4  $4,583,545  47.4%  4.76% 8.1 
Unsecured 5,331,283  52.4%  4.95% 4.7  5,092,967  52.6%  5.08% 4.3 
                  
Total $10,176,527  100.0%  4.90% 6.4  $9,676,512  100.0%  4.93% 6.1 
                  
  
Fixed Rate Debt:  
Secured — Conventional $3,885,690  38.2%  5.75% 7.0 
Unsecured — Public/Private 4,373,624  43.0%  5.80% 5.3 
Secured – Conventional $3,737,865  38.6%  5.60% 6.9 
Unsecured – Public/Private 4,284,995  44.3%  5.71% 5.0 
                  
Fixed Rate Debt 8,259,314  81.2%  5.77% 6.1  8,022,860  82.9%  5.66% 5.8 
                  
  
Floating Rate Debt:  
Secured — Conventional 353,892  3.5%  2.50% 3.5 
Secured — Tax Exempt 605,662  5.9%  0.50% 20.6 
Unsecured — Public/Private 811,659  8.0%  1.73% 1.6 
Unsecured — Revolving Credit Facility 146,000  1.4%  0.67% 1.4 
Secured – Conventional 251,305  2.6%  2.85% 0.7 
Secured – Tax Exempt 594,375  6.2%  0.32% 19.1 
Unsecured – Public/Private 807,972  8.3%  1.68% 1.1 
Unsecured – Revolving Credit Facility    0.9 
                  
Floating Rate Debt 1,917,213  18.8%  1.39% 7.7  1,653,652  17.1%  1.38% 7.2 
                  
  
Total $10,176,527  100.0%  4.90% 6.4  $9,676,512  100.0%  4.93% 6.1 
                  
 
(1) Net of the effect of any derivative instruments. Weighted average rates are for the nine monthsquarter ended September 30, 2010.March 31, 2011.
Note: The Operating Partnership capitalized interest of approximately $10.2$1.7 million and $28.7 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The Operating Partnership capitalized interest of approximately $2.3 million and $7.7$4.4 million during the quarters ended September 30,March 31, 2011 and 2010, and September 30, 2009, respectively.

40


Debt Maturity Schedule as of September 30, 2010March 31, 2011
(Amounts in thousands)
                                                
 Weighted Average Weighted Average  Weighted Average Weighted Average 
 Fixed Floating Rates on Fixed Rates on  Fixed Floating Rates on Fixed Rates on 
Year Rate (1) Rate (1) Total % of Total Rate Debt (1) Total Debt (1)  Rate (1) Rate (1) Total % of Total Rate Debt (1) Total Debt (1) 
2010 $4,087 $17,812 $21,899  0.2%  7.35%  3.39%
2011  999,622 (2)  741,382 (3) 1,741,004  17.1%  5.43%  3.69% $694,503(2) $685,347(3) $1,379,850  14.3%  4.80%  3.03%
2012 774,807  184,537 (4) 959,344  9.4%  5.68%  4.85% 779,271 37,676 816,947  8.4%  5.62%  5.55%
2013 270,415 312,160 582,575  5.7%  6.75%  4.91% 269,502 308,489 577,991  6.0%  6.72%  4.88%
2014 562,456 22,054 584,510  5.8%  5.32%  5.25% 562,921 22,007 584,928  6.0%  5.31%  5.24%
2015 358,167  358,167  3.5%  6.40%  6.40% 358,051  358,051  3.7%  6.40%  6.40%
2016 1,150,352  1,150,352  11.3%  5.35%  5.35% 1,192,909  1,192,909  12.3%  5.35%  5.35%
2017 1,355,863 456 1,356,319  13.4%  5.87%  5.87% 1,355,833 456 1,356,289  14.0%  5.87%  5.87%
2018 80,782 44,677 125,459  1.2%  5.73%  4.28% 80,767 44,677 125,444  1.3%  5.72%  4.26%
2019 801,786 20,766 822,552  8.1%  5.49%  5.37% 801,759 20,766 822,525  8.5%  5.49%  5.36%
2020+ 1,900,977 573,369 2,474,346  24.3%  5.68%  4.54%
2020 1,671,836 809 1,672,645  17.3%  5.50%  5.50%
2021+ 255,508 533,425 788,933  8.2%  6.62%  2.66%
                          
Total $8,259,314 $1,917,213 $10,176,527  100.0%  5.77%  4.88% $8,022,860 $1,653,652 $9,676,512  100.0%  5.60%  4.91%
                          
 
(1) Net of the effect of any derivative instruments. Weighted average rates are as of September 30, 2010.March 31, 2011.
 
(2) Includes $482.5 million face value of 3.85% convertible unsecured debt with a final maturity of 2026. The notes are callable by the Operating Partnership on or after August 18, 2011. The notes are putable by the holders on August 18, 2011, August 15, 2016 and August 15, 2021.
 
(3) IncludesEffective April 5, 2011, the Operating Partnership’sPartnership exercised the second of its two one-year extension options for its $500.0 million term loan facility which originally matured on October 5, 2010. Effective April 12, 2010, the Operating Partnership exercised the first of its two one-year extension options. Asand as a result, the maturity date is now October 5, 2011 and there is one remaining one-year extension option exercisable by the Operating Partnership.
(4)Includes $146.0 million outstanding on the Operating Partnership’s unsecured revolving credit facility. As of September 30, 2010, there was approximately $1.2 billion available on this facility.2012.
     The following table provides a summary of the Operating Partnership’s unsecured debt as of September 30, 2010:March 31, 2011:

4136


Unsecured Debt Summary as of September 30, 2010March 31, 2011
(Amounts in thousands)
                                        
 Unamortized    Unamortized   
 Coupon Due Face Premium/ Net  Coupon Due Face Premium/ Net 
 Rate Date Amount (Discount) Balance  Rate Date Amount (Discount) Balance 
Fixed Rate Notes:
  
  6.950% 03/02/11 $93,096 $404 $93,500 
  6.625% 03/15/12 253,858  (275) 253,583   6.625% 03/15/12 $253,858 $(183) $253,675 
  5.500% 10/01/12 222,133  (438) 221,695   5.500% 10/01/12 222,133  (329) 221,804 
  5.200%  04/01/13 (1) 400,000  (296) 399,704   5.200%  04/01/13  (1) 400,000  (237) 399,763 
Fair Value Derivative Adjustments   (1)  (300,000)   (300,000)     (1)  (300,000)   (300,000)
  5.250% 09/15/14 500,000  (244) 499,756   5.250% 09/15/14 500,000  (213) 499,787 
  6.584% 04/13/15 300,000  (496) 299,504   6.584% 04/13/15 300,000  (441) 299,559 
  5.125% 03/15/16 500,000  (291) 499,709   5.125% 03/15/16 500,000  (264) 499,736 
  5.375% 08/01/16 400,000  (1,082) 398,918   5.375% 08/01/16 400,000  (989) 399,011 
  5.750% 06/15/17 650,000  (3,433) 646,567   5.750% 06/15/17 650,000  (3,179) 646,821 
  7.125% 10/15/17 150,000  (457) 149,543   7.125% 10/15/17 150,000  (424) 149,576 
  4.750% 07/15/20 600,000  (4,464) 595,536   4.750% 07/15/20 600,000  (4,235) 595,765 
  7.570% 08/15/26 140,000  140,000   7.570% 08/15/26 140,000  140,000 
  3.850%  08/15/26 (2) 482,545  (6,936) 475,609   3.850%  08/15/26  (2) 482,545  (3,047) 479,498 
              
 4,391,632  (18,008) 4,373,624  4,298,536  (13,541) 4,284,995 
              
  
Floating Rate Notes:
  
  04/01/13 (1) 300,000  300,000   04/01/13  (1) 300,000  300,000 
Fair Value Derivative Adjustments   (1) 11,659  11,659      (1) 7,972  7,972 
Term Loan Facility LIBOR+0.50%  10/05/11 (3) (4) 500,000  500,000  LIBOR+0.50%  10/05/11  (3)(4) 500,000  500,000 
              
 811,659  811,659  807,972  807,972 
  
Revolving Credit Facility:
 LIBOR+0.50%  02/28/12 (3) (5) 146,000  146,000  LIBOR+0.50%  02/28/12  (3)(5)    
              
  
Total Unsecured Debt
 $5,349,291 $(18,008) $5,331,283  $5,106,508 $(13,541) $5,092,967 
              
 
(1) $300.0 million in fairFair value interest rate swaps converts a portionconvert $300.0 million of the 5.200% notes due April 1, 2013 to a floating interest rate.
 
(2) Convertible notes mature on August 15, 2026. The notes are callable by the Operating Partnership on or after August 18, 2011. The notes are putable by the holders on August 18, 2011, August 15, 2016 and August 15, 2021.
 
(3) Facilities are private. All other unsecured debt is public.
 
(4) RepresentsEffective April 5, 2011, the Operating Partnership’sPartnership exercised the second of its two one-year extension options for its $500.0 million term loan facility which originally matured on October 5, 2010. Effective April 12, 2010, the Operating Partnership exercised the first of its two one-year extension options. Asand as a result, the maturity date is now October 5, 2011 and there is one remaining one-year extension option exercisable by the Operating Partnership.2012.
 
(5) Represents amount outstandingAs of March 31, 2011, there was approximately $1.34 billion available on the Operating Partnership’s unsecured revolving credit facility which matures on February 28, 2012. As of September 30, 2010, there was approximately $1.2 billion available on this facility.
     An unlimited amount of equity and debt securities remains available for issuance by EQR and the Operating Partnership under effective shelf registration statements filed with the SEC. Most recently, EQR and the Operating Partnership filed a universal shelf registration statement for an unlimited amount of equity and debt securities that became automatically effective upon filing with the SEC in October 2010 (under SEC regulations enacted in 2005, the registration statement automatically expires on October 14, 2013 and does not contain a maximum issuance amount). However, as of April 28, 2011, issuances under the ATM share offering program are limited to 10.0 million additional shares. Per the terms of ERPOP’s partnership agreement, EQR contributes the net proceeds of all equity offerings to the capital of the Operating Partnership in exchange for additional OP Units (on a one-for-one Common Share per OP Unit basis) or preference units (on a one-for-one preferred share per preference unit basis).
     The Operating Partnership’s “Consolidated Debt-to-Total Market Capitalization Ratio” as of September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 is presented in the following table. The Operating Partnership calculates the equity component of its market capitalization as the sum of (i) the total outstanding Units at the equivalent market value of the closing price of EQR’s Common Shares on the New York Stock Exchange;Exchange and (ii) the “OP Unit Equivalent” of all convertible preference units; and (iii) the liquidation value of all perpetual preference units outstanding.

4237


Capital Structure as of September 30, 2010March 31, 2011
(Amounts in thousands except for unit and per unit amounts)
                
                
 
Secured Debt $4,845,244  47.6%  $4,583,545  47.4% 
Unsecured Debt 5,331,283  52.4%  5,092,967  52.6% 
          
Total Debt
 10,176,527  100.0%  41.4% 9,676,512  100.0%  35.5%
  
Units 297,830,556 
OP Unit Equivalents (see below) 392,697 
   
Total outstanding at quarter-end 298,223,253 
EQR Common Share Price at September 30, 2010 $47.57 
Total outstanding Units 308,271,339 
EQR Common Share Price at March 31, 2011 $56.41 
      
 14,186,480  98.6%  17,389,586  98.9% 
Perpetual Preference Units (see below) 200,000  1.4%  200,000  1.1% 
          
Total Equity
 14,386,480  100.0%  58.6% 17,589,586  100.0%  64.5%
  
Total Market Capitalization
 $24,563,007  100.0% $27,266,098  100.0%
Convertible Preference Units as of September 30, 2010
(Amounts in thousands except for unit and per unit amounts)
                                 
              Annual  Annual  Weighted       
  Redemption  Outstanding  Liquidation  Dividend  Dividend  Average  Conversion  OP Unit 
Series Date  Units  Value  Per Unit  Amount  Rate  Ratio  Equivalents 
Preference Units:                                
7.00% Series E (1)  11/1/98   323,666  $8,091  $1.75  $567       1.1128   360,176 
7.00% Series H (1)  6/30/98   22,459   562   1.75   39       1.4480   32,521 
                             
Total Convertible Preference Units      346,125  $8,653      $606   7.00%      392,697 
(1)Both the Series E and the Series H Preference Units have been called for redemption effective November 1, 2010.
Perpetual Preference Units as of September 30, 2010March 31, 2011
(Amounts in thousands except for unit and per unit amounts)
                         
              Annual  Annual  Weighted 
  Redemption  Outstanding  Liquidation  Dividend  Dividend  Average 
Series Date  Units  Value  Per Unit  Amount  Rate 
Preference Units:                        
8.29% Series K  12/10/26   1,000,000  $50,000  $4.145  $4,145     
6.48% Series N  6/19/08   600,000   150,000   16.20   9,720     
                      
Total Perpetual Preference Units      1,600,000  $200,000      $13,865   6.93%
     The Operating Partnership generally expects to meet its short-term liquidity requirements, including capital expenditures related to maintaining its existing properties and certain scheduled unsecured note and mortgage note repayments, through its working capital, net cash provided by operating activities and borrowings under its revolving credit facility. Under normal operating conditions, the Operating Partnership considers its cash provided by operating activities to be adequate to meet operating requirements and payments of distributions. However, there may be times when the Operating Partnership experiences shortfalls in its coverage of distributions, which may cause the Operating Partnership to consider reducing its distributions and/or using the proceeds from property dispositions or additional financing transactions to make up the difference. Should these shortfalls occur for lengthy periods of time or be material in nature, the Operating Partnership’s financial condition may be adversely affected and it may not be able to maintain its current distribution levels.
     During the fourth quarter of 2010, EQR announced a new dividend policy which it believes will generate payouts more closely aligned with the actual annual operating results of the Operating Partnership’s core business and provide transparency to investors. EQR and the Operating Partnership intend to pay an annual cash dividend equal to approximately 65% of Normalized FFO. The Operating Partnership reduced its quarterly OPanticipates the expected dividend payout will be $1.56 to $1.62 per Unit dividend beginning($0.3375 per Unit for each of the first three quarters with the dividendbalance for the third quarterfourth quarter) for the year ending December 31, 2011 to bring the total payment for the year to approximately 65% of 2009, from $0.4825 per Unit (an annual rate of $1.93 per Unit)Normalized FFO. The above assumption is based on current expectations and is forward-looking. The new dividend policy will lead to $0.3375 per Unit (an annual rate of $1.35 per Unit).a dividend reduction more quickly than in the past should operating results deteriorate and make it less likely that the Operating Partnership will over distribute. The Operating Partnership believes that its expected 20102011 operating cash flow iswill be sufficient to cover budgeted capital expenditures and distributions at the current rate.distributions.
     The Operating Partnership also expects to meet its long-term liquidity requirements, such as scheduled unsecured note and mortgage debt maturities, property acquisitions, financing of construction and development activities and capital improvements through the issuance of secured and unsecured debt and equity securities, including additional

43


OP Units, and proceeds received from the disposition of certain properties as well as joint ventures. In addition, the Operating Partnership has significant unencumbered properties available to secure additional mortgage borrowings in the event that the public capital markets are unavailable or the cost of alternative sources of capital is too high. The fair value of and cash flow from these unencumbered properties are in excess of the requirements the Operating Partnership must maintain in order to comply with covenants under its unsecured notes and line of credit. Of the $20.0$19.7 billion in investment in real estate on the Operating Partnership’s balance sheet at September 30, 2010, $12.5March 31, 2011, $12.7 billion or 62.4%64.6% was unencumbered. However, there can be no assurances that these sources of capital will be available to the Operating

38


Partnership in the future on acceptable terms or otherwise.
     The Operating Partnership’s credit ratings from Standard & PoorsPoor’s (“S&P”), Moody’s and Fitch for its outstanding senior debt are BBB+, Baa1Baal and A-BBB+, respectively. EQR’s equity ratings from S&P, Moody’s and Fitch for its outstanding preferred equity are BBB+, Baa2 and BBB,BBB-, respectively. During the thirdfourth quarter of 2009,2010, Fitch downgraded the Operating Partnership’s credit rating from A- to BBB+ and EQR’s equity rating from BBB+ to BBB-, which did not have an effect on the Operating Partnership’s cost of funds. During the first quarter of 2011, Moody’s and Fitch placedraised its outlook for both EQR and the Operating Partnership onfrom negative outlook to stable outlook.
     The Operating Partnership has a $1.425 billion (net of $75.0 million which had been committed by a now bankrupt financial institution and is not available for borrowing) long-term revolving credit facility with available borrowings as of OctoberApril 28, 20102011 of $1.06$1.31 billion (net of $84.3$114.1 million which was restricted/dedicated to support letters of credit net of $285.0 million outstanding and net of the $75.0 million discussed above) that matures in February 2012 (see Note 10 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion). This facility may, among other potential uses, be used to fund property acquisitions, costs for certain properties under development and short-term liquidity requirements.
     On July 16,In 2010, a portion of the parking garage collapsed at one of the Operating Partnership’s rental properties (Prospect Towers in Hackensack, New Jersey). The Operating Partnership estimates that the costs related to such collapse (both expensed and capitalized), including providing for residents’ interim needs, lost revenue and garage reconstruction, will be approximately $12.0$14.0 million, after insurance reimbursements of $8.0 million. Costs to rebuild the garage will beare capitalized as incurred. Other costs, like those to accommodate displaced residents, lost revenue due to a portion of the project being temporarily unavailable for occupancy and legal costs, will reduce earnings as they are incurred. Generally, insurance proceeds will beare recorded as increases to earnings as they are received. An impairment charge of $1.3 million was recognized to write-offDuring the net book value of the collapsed garage and an offsetting receivable was booked reflecting expected insurance recoveries. Subsequent to quarter-end,quarter ended March 31, 2011, the Operating Partnership received approximately $2.5$1.6 million in initial insurance proceeds. Expensesproceeds which offset expenses of $3.5$0.9 million that were recorded in the third quarter of 2010 relating to this loss and are included in real estate taxes and insurance on the consolidated statements of operations. In addition, the Operating Partnership estimates that its lost revenues approximated $0.8$0.4 million induring the third quarter of 2010ended March 31, 2011 as a result of lost occupancy in the high-rise tower being unoccupied following the garage collapse. Through April 28, 2011, the Operating Partnership has cumulatively received approximately $5.6 million in insurance proceeds which partially offsets expenses of $6.4 million and the Operating Partnership’s estimate of its lost revenues, which approximated $1.9 million.
     See Note 16 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion of otherthe events which occurred subsequent to September 30, 2010.March 31, 2011.
     Capitalization of Fixed Assets and Improvements to Real Estate
     Our policy with respect to capital expenditures is generally to capitalize expenditures that improve the value of the property or extend the useful life of the component asset of the property. We track improvements to real estate in two major categories and several subcategories:
  Replacements(inside the apartment unit). These include:
  flooring such as carpets, hardwood, vinyl, linoleum or tile;
 
  appliances;
 
  mechanical equipment such as individual furnace/air units, hot water heaters, etc;
 
  furniture and fixtures such as kitchen/bath cabinets, light fixtures, ceiling fans, sinks, tubs, toilets, mirrors, countertops, etc; and
 
  blinds/shades.
     All replacements are depreciated over a five-yearfive to ten-year estimated useful life. We expense as incurred all make-ready maintenance and turnover costs such as cleaning, interior painting of individual apartment units and the repair of any replacement item noted above.
  Building improvements (outside the apartment unit). These include:
  roof replacement and major repairs;
 
  paving or major resurfacing of parking lots, curbs and sidewalks;

44


  amenities and common areas such as pools, exterior sports and playground equipment, lobbies, clubhouses, laundry rooms, alarm and security systems and offices;
 
  major building mechanical equipment systems;
 
  interior and exterior structural repair and exterior painting and siding;
 
  major landscaping and grounds improvement; and
vehicles and office and maintenance equipment.

39


vehicles and office and maintenance equipment.
     All building improvements are depreciated over a five to ten-year estimated useful life. We capitalize building improvements and upgrades only if the item: (i) exceeds $2,500 (selected projects must exceed $10,000); (ii) extends the useful life of the asset; and (iii) improves the value of the asset.
     For the nine monthsquarter ended September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, our actual improvements to real estate totaled approximately $99.0$29.9 million. This includes the following (amounts in thousands except for apartment unit and per apartment unit amounts):
Capital Expenditures to Real Estate
For the Nine MonthsQuarter Ended September 30, 2010March 31, 2011
                            
                             Total Avg. Per Avg. Per Avg. Per 
 Total Avg. Building Avg. Avg.  Apartment Apartment Building Apartment Apartment 
 Units (1) Replacements (2) Per Unit Improvements Per Unit Total Per Unit  Units (1) Replacements (2) Unit Improvements Unit Total Unit 
Same Store Properties (3) 116,775 $54,840 $469 $37,577 $322 $92,417 $791  112,363 $16,503 $147 $10,329 $92 $26,832 $239 
  
Non-Same Store Properties (4) 11,574 2,409 289 3,595 431 6,004 720  10,543 1,054 104 1,743 172 2,797 276 
  
Other (5)  292 246 538   211 51 262 
                  
 
Total 128,349 $57,541 $41,418 $98,959  122,906 $17,768 $12,123 $29,891 
                  
 
(1) Total Apartment Units Excludes 4,6804,805 military housing apartment units for which repairs and maintenance expenses and capital expenditures to real estate are self-funded and do not consolidate into the Operating Partnership’s results.
 
(2) Replacements Includes new expenditures inside the apartment units such as appliances, mechanical equipment, fixtures and flooring, including carpeting. Replacements for same store properties also include $23.0$8.9 million spent in Q1 2011 on various assets related toapartment unit renovations/rehabs (primarily kitchens and baths) on 1,132 apartment units (equating to about $7,900 per apartment unit rehabbed) designed to reposition these assets for higher rental levels in their respective markets.
 
(3) Same Store Properties Primarily includes all properties acquired or completed and stabilized prior to January 1, 2009,2010, less properties subsequently sold.
 
(4) Non-Same Store Properties Primarily includes all properties acquired during 20092010 and 2010,2011, plus any properties in lease-up and not stabilized as of January 1, 2009.2010. Per apartment unit amounts are based on a weighted average of 8,33610,137 apartment units.
 
(5) Other Primarily includes expenditures for properties sold during the period.
     For 2010,2011, the Operating Partnership estimates that it will spend approximately $1,075$1,200 per apartment unit of capital expenditures for its same store properties inclusive of apartment unit renovation/rehab costs, or $825$850 per apartment unit excluding apartment unit renovation/rehab costs. For 2011, the Operating Partnership estimates that it will spend $41.0 million rehabbing 5,500 apartment units (equating to about $7,500 per apartment unit rehabbed). The above assumptions are based on current expectations and are forward-looking.
     During the nine monthsquarter ended September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, the Operating Partnership’s total non-real estate capital additions, such as computer software, computer equipment, and furniture and fixtures and leasehold improvements to the Operating Partnership’s property management offices and its corporate offices, were approximately $1.0$2.7 million. The Operating Partnership expects to fund approximately $0.6$5.8 million in total additions to non-real estate property for the remainder of 2010.2011. The above assumption is based on current expectations and is forward-looking.
     Improvements to real estate and additions to non-real estate property are generally funded from net cash provided by operating activities and from investment cash flow.
     Derivative Instruments
     In the normal course of business, the Operating Partnership is exposed to the effect of interest rate changes. The Operating Partnership seeks to manage these risks by following established risk management policies and procedures including the use of derivatives to hedge interest rate risk on debt instruments.
     The Operating Partnership has a policy of only entering into contracts with major financial institutions based upon their credit ratings and other factors. When viewed in conjunction with the underlying and offsetting exposure that the derivatives are designed to hedge, the Operating Partnership has not sustained a material loss from these instruments nor does it anticipate any material adverse effect on its net income or financial position in the future from the use of

45


derivatives it currently has in place.
     See Note 11 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion of derivative instruments at September 30, 2010.

40


March 31, 2011.
     Other
     Total distributions paid in October 2010April 2011 amounted to $103.1$106.4 million (excluding distributions on Partially Owned Properties), which included certain distributions declared during the thirdfirst quarter ended September 30, 2010.March 31, 2011.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations
     In 2010, the Operating Partnership admitted an 80% institutional partner to an entity owning a developable land parcel in Florida in exchange for $11.7 million in cash and retained a 20% equity interest. This land parcel is now unconsolidated. Total project cost is approximately $76.1 million and construction is expected to start in the second quarter of 2011. The Operating Partnership had co-invested in various properties that were unconsolidatedis responsible for constructing the project and accounted for underhas given certain construction cost overrun guarantees. The Operating Partnership’s remaining funding obligation is currently estimated at approximately $2.3 million. The Operating Partnership’s strategy with respect to this venture was to reduce its financial risk related to the equity methoddevelopment of accounting. Managementthis property. However, management does not believe these investments hadthat this investment has a materially different impact upon the Operating Partnership’s liquidity, cash flows, capital resources, credit or market risk than its other property management and ownershipconsolidated development activities. During 2000 and 2001, the Operating Partnership entered into institutional ventures with an unaffiliated partner. At the respective closing dates, the Operating Partnership sold and/or contributed 45 properties containing 10,846 units to these ventures and retained a 25% ownership interest in the ventures. The Operating Partnership’s joint venture partner contributed cash equal to 75% of the agreed-upon equity value of the properties comprising the ventures, which was then distributed to the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership’s strategy with respect to these ventures was to reduce its concentration of properties in a variety of markets. As of September 30, 2010, the Operating Partnership had sold its interest in these unconsolidated ventures with the exception of eight properties consisting of 2,061 units which were acquired by the Operating Partnership. All of the related debt encumbering these ventures was extinguished.
     As of September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, the Operating Partnership has fivefour projects totaling 1,499747 apartment units in various stages of development with estimated completion dates ranging through September 30, 2012,2013, as well as other completed development projects that are in various stages of lease up or are stabilized. The development agreements currently in place are discussed in detail in Note 14 of the Operating Partnership’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
     See also Notes 2 and 6 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion regarding the Operating Partnership’s investments in partially owned entities.
     The Operating Partnership’s contractual obligations for the next five years and thereafter have not changed materially from the amounts and disclosures included in its annual report on Form 10-K, other than as it relates to scheduled debt maturities. See the updated debt maturity schedule included in Liquidity and Capital Resources for further discussion.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
     The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to use judgment in the application of accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions. If our judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions had been different or different assumptions were made, it is possible that different accounting policies would have been applied, resulting in different financial results or different presentation of our financial statements.
     The Operating Partnership has identified five significant accounting policies as critical accounting policies. These critical accounting policies are those that have the most impact on the reporting of our financial condition and those requiring significant judgments and estimates. With respect to these critical accounting policies, management believes that the application of judgments and estimates is consistently applied and produces financial information that fairly presents the results of operations for all periods presented. The five critical accounting policies are:
     Acquisition of Investment Properties
     The Operating Partnership allocates the purchase price of properties to net tangible and identified intangible assets acquired based on their fair values. In making estimates of fair values for purposes of allocating purchase price, the Operating Partnership utilizes a number of sources, including independent appraisals that may be obtained in connection with the acquisition or financing of the respective property, our own analysis of recently acquired and existing comparable properties in our portfolio and other market data. The Operating Partnership also considers information obtained about each property as a result of its pre-acquisition due diligence, marketing and leasing activities in estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired.

46


     Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
     The Operating Partnership periodically evaluates its long-lived assets, including its investments in real estate, for indicators of impairment. The judgments regarding the existence of impairment indicators are based on factors such as operational performance, market conditions and legal and environmental concerns, as well as the Operating

41


Partnership’s ability to hold and its intent with regard to each asset. Future events could occur which would cause the Operating Partnership to conclude that impairment indicators exist and an impairment loss is warranted.
     Depreciation of Investment in Real Estate
     The Operating Partnership depreciates the building component of its investment in real estate over a 30-year estimated useful life, building improvements over a 5-year to 10-year estimated useful life and both the furniture, fixtures and equipment and replacements components over a 5-year to 10-year estimated useful life, all of which are judgmental determinations.
     Cost Capitalization
     See theCapitalization of Fixed Assets and Improvements to Real Estatesection for a discussion of the Operating Partnership’s policy with respect to capitalization vs. expensing of fixed asset/repair and maintenance costs. In addition, the Operating Partnership capitalizes an allocation of the payroll and associated costs of employees directly responsible for and who spend all of their time on the supervision of major capital and/or renovation projects. These costs are reflected on the balance sheet as an increase to depreciable property.
     For all development projects, the Operating Partnership uses its professional judgment in determining whether such costs meet the criteria for capitalization or must be expensed as incurred. The Operating Partnership capitalizes interest, real estate taxes and insurance and payroll and associated costs for those individuals directly responsible for and who spend all of their time on development activities, with capitalization ceasing no later than 90 days following issuance of the certificate of occupancy. These costs are reflected on the balance sheet as construction-in-progress for each specific property. The Operating Partnership expenses as incurred all payroll costs of on-site employees working directly at our properties, except as noted above on our development properties prior to certificate of occupancy issuance and on specific major renovations at selected properties when additional incremental employees are hired.
     Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Including Derivative Instruments
     The valuation of financial instruments requires the Operating Partnership to make estimates and judgments that affect the fair value of the instruments. The Operating Partnership, where possible, bases the fair values of its financial instruments, including its derivative instruments, on listed market prices and third party quotes. Where these are not available, the Operating Partnership bases its estimates on current instruments with similar terms and maturities or on other factors relevant to the financial instruments.
Funds From Operations and Normalized Funds From Operations
     For the nine monthsquarter ended September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, Funds From Operations (“FFO”) available to Units decreased by $2.4 million or 0.5% as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
          For the quarter ended September 30, 2010,and Normalized FFO available to Units increased by $11.8$28.0 million, or 7.6%19.3%, and $24.9 million, or 16.6%, respectively, as compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2009.March 31, 2010.
     The following is a reconciliation of net income to FFO available to Units and Normalized FFO available to Units for the nine months and quarters ended September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 and 2009:2010:

4742



Funds From Operations and Normalized Funds From Operations
(Amounts in thousands)
(Unaudited)
                
 Nine Months Ended Quarter Ended         
 September 30, September 30,  Quarter Ended March 31, 
 2010 2009 2010 2009  2011 2010 
Net income $97,771 $334,718 $29,826 $143,365  $133,066 $57,856 
Adjustments:  
Net loss attributable to Noncontrolling Interests — Partially Owned Properties 623 391 188 317 
Net (income) loss attributable to Noncontrolling Interests – Partially Owned Properties 40 250 
Depreciation 500,173 428,751 173,642 144,165  167,968 146,042 
Depreciation — Non-real estate additions  (5,009)  (5,569)  (1,640)  (1,777)
Depreciation — Partially Owned and Unconsolidated Properties  (849) 656  (856) 225 
Depreciation – Non-real estate additions  (1,438)  (1,693)
Depreciation – Partially Owned and Unconsolidated Properties  (750) 11 
Net (gain) on sales of unconsolidated entities  (28,101)  (6,718)  (22,544)  (3,959)   (478)
Discontinued operations:  
Depreciation 1,522 22,736 377 5,487  1,395 6,692 
Net (gain) on sales of discontinued operations  (69,538)  (274,933)  (9,285)  (129,135)  (123,754)  (60,036)
Net incremental gain (loss) on sales of condominium units 619  (450)  (12)  (785)
Net incremental gain on sales of condominium units 395 388 
              
  
FFO (1) (2) 497,211 499,582 169,696 157,903 
FFO (1) (3) 176,922 149,032 
 
Adjustments: 
Asset impairment and valuation allowances   
Property acquisition costs and write-off of pursuit costs (other expenses) 2,164 4,383 
Debt extinguishment (gains) losses, including prepayment penalties, preference unit redemptions and non-cash convertible debt discounts 2,063 2,872 
(Gains) losses on sales of non-operating assets, net of income and other tax expense (benefit)  (376)  (367)
Other miscellaneous non-comparable items  (2,100)  (2,000)
     
 
Normalized FFO (2) (3) $178,673 $153,920 
     
 
FFO (1) (3) $176,922 $149,032 
Preferred distributions  (10,855)  (10,868)  (3,617)  (3,621)  (3,466)  (3,620)
              
  
FFO available to Units (1) (2) $486,356 $488,714 $166,079 $154,282 
FFO available to Units (1) (3) (4) $173,456 $145,412 
              
 
Normalized FFO (2) (3) $178,673 $153,920 
Preferred distributions  (3,466)  (3,620)
     
 
Normalized FFO available to Units (2) (3) (4) $175,207 $150,300 
     
 
(1) The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) defines funds from operations (“FFO”) (April 2002 White Paper) as net income (computed in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”)), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of depreciable property, plus depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures will be calculated to reflect funds from operations on the same basis. The April 2002 White Paper states that gain or loss on sales of property is excluded from FFO for previously depreciated operating properties only. Once the Operating Partnership commences the conversion of apartment units to condominiums, it simultaneously discontinues depreciation of such property. FFO available to Units is calculated on a basis consistent with net income available to Units and reflects adjustments to net income for preferred distributions and premiums on redemption of preference units/interests in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
 
(2)Normalized funds from operations (“Normalized FFO”) begins with FFO and excludes:
the impact of any expenses relating to asset impairment and valuation allowances;
property acquisition and other transaction costs related to mergers and acquisitions and pursuit cost write-offs (other expenses);
gains and losses from early debt extinguishment, including prepayment penalties, preference unit redemptions and the cost related to the implied option value of non-cash convertible debt discounts;
gains and losses on the sales of non-operating assets, including gains and losses from land parcel and condominium sales, net of the effect of income tax benefits or expenses; and
other miscellaneous non-comparable items.
(3) The Operating Partnership believes that FFO and FFO available to Units are helpful to investors as supplemental measures of the operating performance of a real estate company, because they are recognized measures of performance by the real estate industry and by excluding gains or losses related to dispositions of depreciable property and excluding real estate depreciation (which can vary among owners of identical assets in similar condition based on historical cost accounting and useful life

43


estimates), FFO and FFO available to Units can help compare the operating performance of a company’s real estate between periods or as compared to different companies. The Operating Partnership also believes that Normalized FFO and Normalized FFO available to Units are helpful to investors as supplemental measures of the operating performance of a real estate company because they allow investors to compare the company’s operating performance to its performance in prior reporting periods and to the operating performance of other real estate companies without the effect of items that by their nature are not comparable from period to period and tend to obscure the Operating Partnership’s actual operating results. FFO, FFO available to Units, Normalized FFO and Normalized FFO available to Units do not represent net income, net income available to Units or net cash flows from operating activities in accordance with GAAP. Therefore, FFO, FFO available to Units, Normalized FFO and Normalized FFO available to Units should not be exclusively considered as alternatives to net income, net income available to Units or net cash flows from operating activities as determined by GAAP or as a measure of liquidity. The Operating Partnership’sParntership’s calculation of FFO, FFO available to Units, Normalized FFO and Normalized FFO available to Units may differ from other real estate companies due to, among other items, variations in cost capitalization policies for capital expenditures and, accordingly, may not be comparable to such other real estate companies.
(4)FFO available to Units and Normalized FFO available to Units are calculated on a basis consistent with net income available to Units and reflects adjustments to net income for preferred distributions and premiums on redemption of preference units in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
     The Operating Partnership’s market risk has not changed materially from the amounts and information reported in Part II, Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, to the Operating Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.2010. See theCurrent Environmentsection of Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operationsrelating to market risk and the current economic environment. See also Note 11 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion of derivative and other fair value instruments.
Item 4.Controls and Procedures
     (a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures:
     Effective as of September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, the Operating Partnership carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Operating Partnership’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of EQR, of the effectiveness of the Operating Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange

48


Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Operating Partnership in its Exchange Act filings is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
     (b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting:
     There were no changes to the internal control over financial reporting of the Operating Partnership identified in connection with the Operating Partnership’s evaluation referred to in Item 4(a) above that occurred during the thirdfirst quarter of 20102011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.

4944


PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
     The Operating Partnership does not believe that there have been any material developments in the legal proceedings that were discussed in Part I, Item 3 of the Operating Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.2010.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
     There have been no material changes to the risk factors that were discussed in Part I, Item 1A of the Operating Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved).2010.
Item 6. Exhibits See the Exhibit Index

5045


SIGNATURES
     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
     
 ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

BY: EQUITY RESIDENTIAL
ITS GENERAL PARTNER

 
 
   
Date: November 4, 2010May 5, 2011 By:  /s/ Mark J. Parrell   
  Mark J. Parrell  
  Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer 
 
 
   
Date: November 4, 2010May 5, 2011 By:  /s/ Ian S. Kaufman   
  Ian S. Kaufman
Senior Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer 
 

5146


EXHIBIT INDEX
The exhibits listed below are filed as part of this report. References to exhibits or other filings under the caption “Location” indicate that the exhibit or other filing has been filed, that the indexed exhibit and the exhibit referred to are the same and that the exhibit referred to is incorporated by reference. The Commission file number for our Exchange Act filings referenced below is 0-24920.
     
Exhibit Description Location
10.1*First Amendment to Second Restated 2002 Share Incentive Plan.Included as Exhibit 10.1 to Equity Residential’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010.
31.1 Certification of David J. Neithercut, Chief Executive Officer of Registrant’s General Partner. Attached herein.
     
31.2 Certification of Mark J. Parrell, Chief Financial Officer of Registrant’s General Partner. Attached herein.
     
32.1 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of David J. Neithercut, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant’s General Partner. Attached herein.
     
32.2 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Mark J. Parrell, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant’s General Partner. Attached herein.
*Management contracts and compensatory plans or arrangements filed as exhibits to this report are identified by an asterisk.