UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
   
þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31,September 30, 2011
or
   
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                    to                    
Commission file number 000-04065
Lancaster Colony Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
   
Ohio 13-1955943
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
   
37 West Broad Street 43215
Columbus, Ohio (Zip Code)43215
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
614-224-7141
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesþ Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yesþ Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
       
Large acceleratedAccelerated filerþ Accelerated filero Non-accelerated fileroSmaller reporting companyo

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 Smaller Reporting Companyo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yeso Noþ
As of April 29,October 27, 2011, there were approximately 27,441,00027,245,000 shares of Common Stock, without par value, outstanding.
 
 

 

 


 

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
     
    
     
  3 
     
  3 
     
  4 
     
  5 
     
  6 
     
  1514 
     
  2119 
     
  2119 
     
    
     
  2220 
     
  2220 
     
  2220 
     
  2321 
     
  2422 
     
Exhibit 10.1
Exhibit 10.2
 Exhibit 31.1
 Exhibit 31.2
 Exhibit 32
 EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
 EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

 

2


PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. 
Consolidated Financial Statements
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
                
 March 31 June 30  September 30 June 30 
(Amounts in thousands, except share data) 2011 2010  2011 2011 
ASSETS
 
ASSETS
 
Current Assets:
  
Cash and equivalents $107,702 $100,890  $128,264 $132,266 
Receivables (less allowance for doubtful accounts, March—$602; June—$516) 77,928 67,766 
Receivables (less allowance for doubtful accounts, September — $618 and June — $570) 85,118 63,762 
Inventories:  
Raw materials 35,593 36,812  35,827 36,785 
Finished goods and work in process 68,528 84,697  74,421 75,100 
          
Total inventories 104,121 121,509  110,248 111,885 
Deferred income taxes and other current assets 27,466 27,234  19,995 25,283 
          
Total current assets 317,217 317,399  343,625 333,196 
 
Property, Plant and Equipment:
  
Land, buildings and improvements 137,446 129,747  142,652 141,175 
Machinery and equipment 259,204 242,024  268,048 263,449 
          
Total cost 396,650 371,771  410,700 404,624 
Less accumulated depreciation 215,576 205,674  223,700 219,342 
          
Property, plant and equipment — net 181,074 166,097  187,000 185,282 
Other Assets:
  
Goodwill 89,840 89,840  89,840 89,840 
Other intangible assets — net 8,641 9,514  8,059 8,350 
Other noncurrent assets 4,657 3,603  5,409 5,421 
          
Total
 $601,429 $586,453  $633,933 $622,089 
          
 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
Current Liabilities:
  
Accounts payable $39,976 $41,904  $45,151 $42,570 
Accrued liabilities 38,362 36,049  35,562 33,586 
          
Total current liabilities 78,338 77,953  80,713 76,156 
Other Noncurrent Liabilities
 16,667 19,138  13,489 13,646 
Deferred Income Taxes
 8,578 4,454  17,225 14,748 
Shareholders’ Equity:
  
Preferred stock — authorized 3,050,000 shares; outstanding — none      
Common stock — authorized 75,000,000 shares; outstanding —     
March — 27,437,047 shares; June — 28,167,549 shares 96,725 94,885 
Common stock — authorized 75,000,000 shares; outstanding — September — 27,250,441 shares; June — 27,385,781 shares 97,754 97,197 
Retained earnings 1,130,446 1,080,015  1,162,933 1,150,683 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (9,566)  (9,797)  (6,993)  (7,043)
Common stock in treasury, at cost  (719,759)  (680,195)  (731,188)  (723,298)
          
Total shareholders’ equity 497,846 484,908  522,506 517,539 
          
Total
 $601,429 $586,453  $633,933 $622,089 
          
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

3


LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(UNAUDITED)
                        
 Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended  Three Months Ended 
 March 31 March 31  September 30 
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data) 2011 2010 2011 2010  2011 2010 
Net Sales
 $252,623 $250,328 $833,912 $808,603  $274,516 $265,051 
Cost of Sales
 200,089 188,405 645,063 598,196  219,086 206,980 
              
Gross Margin
 52,534 61,923 188,849 210,407  55,430 58,071 
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
 23,060 24,328 72,441 69,196  22,918 23,245 
     
Restructuring and Impairment Charges
  87  2,133 
         
Operating Income
 29,474 37,508 116,408 139,078  32,512 34,826 
Other Income (Expense):
 
Other income — Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act   961 893 
Interest income and other — net 54  (6) 149 53 
Interest Income and Other — Net
  (4) 16 
              
Income Before Income Taxes
 29,528 37,502 117,518 140,024  32,508 34,842 
Taxes Based on Income
 10,087 13,280 40,447 47,870  11,250 12,075 
              
Net Income
 $19,441 $24,222 $77,071 $92,154  $21,258 $22,767 
              
Net Income Per Common Share:
  
Basic and Diluted $.71 $.86 $2.77 $3.27  $.78 $.81 
Cash Dividends Per Common Share
 $.33 $.30 $.96 $.885  $.33 $.30 
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding:
  
Basic 27,494 28,173 27,755 28,134  27,290 28,014 
Diluted 27,520 28,198 27,781 28,163  27,314 28,037 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

4


LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)
                
 Nine Months Ended  Three Months Ended 
 March 31  September 30 
(Amounts in thousands) 2011 2010  2011 2010 
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
  
Net income $77,071 $92,154  $21,258 $22,767 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:  
Depreciation and amortization 14,469 15,666  5,038 4,964 
Deferred income taxes and other noncash changes 5,643 1,777  3,704 1,409 
Restructuring and impairment charges  528 
Loss (gain) on sale of property 14  (25)
Pension plan activity  (1,442)  (405)  (1,040) 116 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:  
Receivables  (10,803)  (19,204)  (21,408)  (15,767)
Inventories 17,388 4,990  1,637  (9,749)
Other current assets  (2,231)  (9,350) 4,762 2,754 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities  (2,081) 743  3,612 2,768 
          
Net cash provided by operating activities 98,028 86,874  17,563 9,262 
          
 
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
  
Payments on property additions  (26,857)  (8,088)  (4,278)  (6,725)
Proceeds from sale of property 19 28 
Other — net 207  (953)  (394) 435 
          
Net cash used in investing activities  (26,631)  (9,013)  (4,672)  (6,290)
          
 
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
  
Purchase of treasury stock  (39,564)    (7,890)  (10,732)
Payment of dividends  (26,640)  (24,959)  (9,008)  (8,409)
Proceeds from the exercise of stock awards 269 4,276 
Proceeds from the exercise of stock awards, including tax benefits 5 1 
Increase in cash overdraft balance 1,350    2,708 
          
Net cash used in financing activities  (64,585)  (20,683)  (16,893)  (16,432)
     
     
Net change in cash and equivalents 6,812 57,178   (4,002)  (13,460)
Cash and equivalents at beginning of year 100,890 38,484  132,266 100,890 
          
Cash and equivalents at end of period $107,702 $95,662  $128,264 $87,430 
          
 
Supplemental Disclosure of Operating Cash Flows:
  
Cash paid during the period for income taxes $37,821 $55,634  $728 $605 
          
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

5


LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Note 1 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In our opinion, the interim consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations and financial position for such periods. All such adjustments reflected in the interim consolidated financial statements are considered to be of a normal recurring nature. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year. Accordingly, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto contained in our 20102011 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Unless otherwise noted, the term “year” and references to a particular year pertain to our fiscal year, which begins on July 1 and ends on June 30; for example, 20112012 refers to fiscal 2011,2012, which is the period from July 1, 20102011 to June 30, 2011.2012.
Subsequent Events
We have evaluated events occurring between the end of our most recent fiscal quarter and the date the financial statements were issued and except as disclosed in Note 11 regarding receipts under the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000, noted no events that would require recognition or disclosure in these financial statements.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Purchases of property, plant and equipment included in accounts payable at March 31, 2011 and 2010 were approximately $0.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively. are as follows:
         
  September 30  September 30 
  2011  2010 
Construction in progress in accounts payable $1,843  $12 
These purchases, less the preceding June 30 balances, have been excluded from the property additions and the change in accounts payable in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Held for Sale
As a result of various prior-years restructuring and divestiture activities, we have certain “held for sale” properties with a total net book value of approximately $2.9$2.8 million at March 31,September 30, 2011. We have classified approximately $0.4 million of these “held for sale” assets as current assets and they areThis balance is included in Deferred Income Taxes and Other CurrentNoncurrent Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The remaining balance of approximately $2.5 million is included in Other Noncurrent Assets. In accordance with GAAP for property, plant and equipment, we are no longer depreciating these “held for sale” assets and they are being actively marketed for sale.
Earnings Per Share
Earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock and common stock equivalents (stock options, restricted(restricted stock and stock-settled stock appreciation rights) outstanding during each period. Unvested shares of restricted stock granted to employees are considered participating securities since employees receive nonforfeitable dividends prior to vesting and, therefore, are included in the earnings allocation in computing EPS under the two-class method. Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, which includes the dilutive potential common shares associated with outstanding stock options, restricted stock and stock-settled stock appreciation rights.

 

6


LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Basic and diluted net income per common share were calculated as follows:
                
 Three Months Nine Months         
 Ended Ended  Three Months Ended 
 March 31 March 31  September 30 
 2011 2010 2011 2010  2011 2010 
Net income $19,441 $24,222 $77,071 $92,154  $21,258 $22,767 
Net income available to participating securities  (25)  (45)  (109)  (158)  (27)  (41)
              
Net income available to common shareholders $19,416 $24,177 $76,962 $91,996  $21,231 $22,726 
              
  
Weighted average common shares outstanding — basic 27,494 28,173 27,755 28,134  27,290 28,014 
Incremental share effect from:  
Stock options  1  4 
Restricted stock 3 2 5 6  6 6 
Stock-settled stock appreciation rights 23 22 21 19  18 17 
              
Weighted average common shares outstanding — diluted 27,520 28,198 27,781 28,163  27,314 28,037 
              
  
Net income per common share — basic and diluted $.71 $.86 $2.77 $3.27  $.78 $.81 
Comprehensive Income
Total comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2011 was approximately $19.5 million and $77.3 million, respectively. Total comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010 was approximately $24.3$21.3 million and $92.6$22.8 million, respectively. The March 31,September 30, 2011 and 2010 comprehensive income consists of net income and pension and postretirement amortization.
Significant Accounting Policies
There were no changes to our Significant Accounting Policies from those disclosed in our 20102011 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Note 2 — Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards
There were no recentlyIn September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued accounting pronouncementsAccounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-09,“Compensation — Retirement Benefits — Multiemployer Plans: Disclosures about an Employer’s Participation in a Multiemployer Plan”(“ASU 11-09”). This ASU requires that employers provide additional separate quantitative and qualitative disclosures for multiemployer pension plans and multiemployer other postretirement benefit plans. ASU 11-09 will be effective for annual periods for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.position or results of operations.
Note 3In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08,“Intangibles — Goodwill and Other Intangible AssetsOther: Testing Goodwill for Impairment”(“ASU 11-08”). This ASU permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. The entity is not required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying value. ASU 11-08 will be effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
Goodwill attributableIn June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05,“Comprehensive Income: Presentation of Comprehensive Income”(“ASU 11-05”). This ASU amends current comprehensive income guidance to eliminate the Specialty Foods segment was approximately $89.8 million at March 31, 2011 and June 30, 2010.option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of shareholders equity. Instead, it requires entities to report components of comprehensive income in either (1) a continuous statement of comprehensive income or (2) two separate but consecutive statements. ASU 11-05

 

7


LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
will be effective for public companies for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
Note 3 — Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill attributable to the Specialty Foods segment was approximately $89.8 million at September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011.
The following table summarizes our identifiable other intangible assets, all included in the Specialty Foods segment:
                
 March 31 June 30  September 30 June 30 
 2011 2010  2011 2011 
Trademarks (40-year life)  
Gross carrying value $370 $370  $370 $370 
Accumulated amortization  (184)  (177)  (188)  (186)
          
Net Carrying Value $186 $193  $182 $184 
          
Customer Relationships (12 to 15-year life)  
Gross carrying value $13,020 $13,020  $13,020 $13,020 
Accumulated amortization  (4,757)  (4,054)  (5,225)  (4,991)
          
Net Carrying Value $8,263 $8,966  $7,795 $8,029 
          
Non-compete Agreements (5 to 8-year life)  
Gross carrying value $1,540 $1,540  $1,540 $1,540 
Accumulated amortization  (1,348)  (1,185)  (1,458)  (1,403)
          
Net Carrying Value $192 $355  $82 $137 
          
Total Net Carrying Value $8,641 $9,514  $8,059 $8,350 
          
Amortization expense relating to these assets was approximately $0.3 million and $0.9 million for both the three and nine months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. as follows:
         
  Three Months Ended 
  September 30 
  2011  2010 
Amortization expense $291  $291 
Total annual amortization expense for each of the next five years is estimated to be approximately $1.1 million next year, $0.9 million for each of the following three years and $0.8 million for the fifth year.as follows:
     
2013 $946 
2014 $946 
2015 $946 
2016 $775 
2017 $604 
Note 4 — Long-Term Debt
At March 31,September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010,2011, we had an unsecured revolving credit facility under which we may borrow up to a maximum of $160 million at any one time, with the potential to expand the total credit availability to $260 million based on obtaining consent of the issuing bank and certain other conditions. The facility expires in October 2012, and all outstanding amounts are then due and payable. At March 31,September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010,2011, we had no borrowings outstanding under this facility. Loans may be used for general corporate purposes. At March 31,September 30, 2011, we had approximately $6.6$6.7 million of standby letters of credit outstanding, which reducereduced the amount available for borrowing on the unsecured revolving credit facility.
Based on the long-term nature of this facility, when we have outstanding borrowings under this facility, we classify the outstanding balance as long-term debt. We paid no interest for the three and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2011 and 2010.
The facility contains certain restrictive covenants, including limitations on indebtedness, asset sales and acquisitions. There are two principal financial covenants: an interest expense test that requires us to maintain

8


LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
an interest coverage ratio not less than 2.5 to 1 at the end of each fiscal quarter; and an indebtedness test that requires us to maintain a leverage ratio not greater than 3 to 1 at all times. The interest coverage ratio is calculated by dividing Consolidated EBIT (as defined more specifically in the credit agreement) by Consolidated Interest Expense (as defined more specifically in the credit agreement), and the leverage ratio is calculated by dividing Consolidated Debt (as defined more specifically in the credit agreement) by Consolidated EBITDA (as defined more specifically in the credit agreement). WeAt September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011, we were in compliance with all applicable provisions and covenants of the facility, and we met the requirements of thesethe financial covenants at March 31,by substantial margins.
We currently expect to remain in compliance with the facility’s covenants for the foreseeable future. At September 30, 2011, and June 30, 2010.we were not aware of any event that would constitute a default under the facility.
Note 5 — Pension Benefits
We and certain of our operating subsidiaries have sponsored multiple defined benefit pension plans covering union workers at certain locations. As a result of restructuring activities in recent years, at March 31, 2011 there werewe no longer have any active employees continuing to accrue service cost or otherwise eligible to receive plan benefits. Benefits being paid under the plans are primarily based on negotiated rates and years of service. We contribute to these plans at least the minimum amount required by regulation or contract.

8


LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
The following table disclosessummarizes the components of net periodic benefit cost for our pension plans:
                 
  Three Months  Nine Months 
  Ended  Ended 
  March 31  March 31 
  2011  2010  2011  2010 
Components of net periodic benefit cost
                
Service cost $  $  $  $45 
Interest cost  487   529   1,461   1,588 
Expected return on plan assets  (507)  (537)  (1,521)  (1,613)
Curtailment charge           349 
Amortization of unrecognized net loss  136   124   410   372 
Amortization of prior service cost           5 
             
Net periodic benefit cost $116  $116  $350  $746 
             
In the first quarter of 2010, one of our plans became subject to curtailment accounting. This resulted in the immediate recognition of all of the outstanding prior service cost of the plan, which was approximately $0.3 million. This charge was recorded in Restructuring and Impairment Charges and related to our Specialty Foods segment.
         
  Three Months Ended 
  September 30 
  2011  2010 
Components of net periodic benefit cost
        
Interest cost $483  $487 
Expected return on plan assets  (599)  (507)
Amortization of unrecognized net loss  89   137 
       
Net periodic benefit (income) cost $(27) $117 
       
For the three and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2011, we made pension plan contributions totaling approximately $1.8$1.0 million. We do not expect to make any further contributions to our pension plans during the remainder of 2011.2012.
Note 6 — Postretirement Benefits
We and certain of our operating subsidiaries provide multiple postretirement medical and life insurance benefit plans. We recognize the cost of benefits as the employees render service. Postretirement benefits are funded as incurred.
The following table discloses net periodic benefit cost for our postretirement plans:
                 
  Three Months  Nine Months 
  Ended  Ended 
  March 31  March 31 
  2011  2010  2011  2010 
Components of net periodic benefit cost
                
Service cost $6  $4  $18  $12 
Interest cost  34   48   102   144 
Amortization of unrecognized gain  (12)  (4)  (36)  (10)
Amortization of prior service asset  (1)  (1)  (3)  (3)
             
Net periodic benefit cost $27  $47  $81  $143 
             
For the three and nine months ended March 31, 2011, we made less than $0.1 million and approximately $0.1 million, respectively, in contributions to our postretirement medical and life insurance benefit plans. We expect to make approximately $0.1 million more in contributions to our postretirement medical and life insurance benefit plans during the remainder of 2011.
Note 7 — Stock-Based Compensation
As approved by our shareholders in November 1995, the terms of the 1995 Key Employee Stock Option Plan (the “1995 Plan”) reserved 3,000,000 common shares for issuance to qualified key employees. All

 

9


LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
options granted underThe following table summarizes the 1995 Plan were exercisable at prices not less than fair market value ascomponents of net periodic benefit cost for our postretirement plans:
         
  Three Months Ended 
  September 30 
  2011  2010 
Components of net periodic benefit cost
        
Service cost $6  $6 
Interest cost  37   34 
Amortization of unrecognized net gain  (8)  (12)
Amortization of prior service asset  (1)  (1)
       
Net periodic benefit cost $34  $27 
       
For the datethree months ended September 30, 2011, we made approximately $36,000 in contributions to our postretirement medical and life insurance benefit plans. We expect to make approximately $0.2 million more in contributions to our postretirement medical and life insurance benefit plans during the remainder of grant. In general, options granted under the 1995 Plan vested immediately and had a maximum term of five years. The 1995 Plan expired in August 2005, but there were options issued under this plan that were exercisable through February 2010. There were no options outstanding under this plan at March 31, 2011.2012.
Note 7 — Stock-Based Compensation
Our shareholders have approved the adoption of and subsequent amendments to the Lancaster Colony Corporation 2005 Stock Plan (the “2005 Plan”). The 2005 Plan reserved 2,000,000 common shares for issuance to our employees and directors, and all awards granted under the 2005 Plan will be exercisable at prices not less than fair market value as of the date of the grant. The vesting period for awards granted under the 2005 Plan varies as to the type of award granted, but generally these awards have a maximum term of five years.
Stock Options
Until 2008, we used stock options as the primary vehicle for rewarding certain employees with long-term incentives for their efforts in helping to create long-term shareholder value. We calculated the fair value of option grants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. There were no grants of stock options during the nine months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
We recognized compensation expense over the requisite service period. Total compensation cost related to stock options was zero for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010. There were no stock option exercises during the nine months ended March 31, 2011, and there are no outstanding stock options at March 31, 2011.
During the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010, we received approximately $0.3 million and $4.0 million, respectively, in cash from the exercise of stock options. The aggregate intrinsic value of these options was approximately $0.1 million and $0.9 million, respectively. A related tax benefit of less than $0.1 million and approximately $0.3 million was recorded in the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010, respectively. These tax benefits were included in the financing section of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and resulted from incentive stock option disqualifying dispositions and exercises of non-qualified options. The benefits included less than $0.1 million of gross windfall tax benefits for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010.
Stock-Settled Stock Appreciation Rights
Since 2008, we have used periodic grants of stock-settled stock appreciation rights (“SSSARs”) as a vehicle for rewarding certain employees with long-term incentives for their efforts in helping to create long-term shareholder value. We calculate the fair value of SSSARs grants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Our policy is to issue shares upon SSSARSSSARs exercise from new shares that had been previously authorized.
In February There were no grants of SSSARs during the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, we granted 94,000 and 167,950no SSSARs respectively, to various employees under the terms of the 2005 Plan. The weighted average per right fair value of the 2011 SSSARs grant was $10.12 and was estimated at the date of grant using the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 1.27%; dividend yield of 2.28%; volatility factor of the expected market price of our common stock of 28.78%; and a weighted average expected life of 3.11 years. The weighted average per right fair value of the 2010 SSSARs grant was $11.81 and was estimated at the date of grant using the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 1.67%; dividend yield of 2.04%; volatility factor of the expected market price of our common stock of 29.97%; and a weighted average expected life of 3.5 years. For both grants, the volatility factor was estimated based on actual historical volatility of our stock for a time period equal to the term of the SSSARs. The SSSARs from both grants vest one-third on the first anniversary of the grant date, one-third on the second anniversary of the grant date and one-third on the third anniversary of the grant date. We are assuming a forfeiture rate of four percent for each ofvested during these grants.periods.
We recognize compensation expense over the requisite service period. Total compensationCompensation cost was reflected in Cost of Sales or Selling, General and Administrative Expenses based on the grantees’ salaries expense classification and were allocated to each segment appropriately. We recorded tax benefits and gross windfall tax benefits related to SSSARs. These windfall tax benefits were included in the financing section of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The following table summarizes SSSARs was approximately $0.3 millioncompensation expense and $0.9 million for the three and nine months ended March 31,tax benefits recorded:
         
  Three Months Ended 
  September 30 
  2011  2010 
Compensation expense $280  $277 
Tax benefits $98  $97 
Intrinsic value of exercises $13  $3 
Gross windfall tax benefits $5  $1 

 

10


LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
2011, respectively, as compared to approximately $0.2 million and $0.4 million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010, respectively. These amounts were reflected in Cost of Sales or Selling, General and Administrative Expenses based on the grantees’ salaries expense classification and were allocated to each segment appropriately. We recorded a tax benefit of approximately $0.1 million and $0.3 million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2011, respectively, as compared to less than $0.1 million and approximately $0.1 million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010, respectively. We also recorded gross windfall tax benefits of approximately $0.1 million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2011, as compared to approximately $0.3 million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010. These windfall tax benefits were included in the financing section of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
The following table summarizes the activity relating to SSSARs granted under the 2005 Plan for the ninethree months ended March 31,September 30, 2011:
                 
          Weighted    
      Weighted  Average    
  Number  Average  Remaining  Aggregate 
  of  Exercise  Contractual  Intrinsic 
  Rights  Price  Life in Years  Value 
Outstanding at beginning of period  309  $49.55         
Exercised  (30) $39.21         
Granted  94  $57.78         
Forfeited  (9) $51.74         
                
Outstanding at end of period  364  $52.49   3.70  $2,952 
             
Exercisable and vested at end of period  139  $46.39   2.87  $1,972 
             
Vested and expected to vest at end of period  358  $52.49   3.69  $2,905 
             
The following table summarizes the status of, and changes to, unvested SSSARs during the nine months ended March 31, 2011:
         
      Weighted 
  Number  Average 
  of  Grant Date 
  Rights  Fair Value 
Unvested at beginning of period  266  $9.77 
Granted  94  $10.12 
Vested  (127) $8.63 
Forfeited  (8) $10.12 
        
Unvested at end of period  225  $10.55 
        
                 
          Weighted    
      Weighted  Average    
  Number  Average  Remaining  Aggregate 
  of  Exercise  Contractual  Intrinsic 
  Rights  Price  Life in Years  Value 
Outstanding at beginning of period  324  $53.98         
Exercised
  (1) $38.31         
Granted
    $         
Forfeited
  (1) $58.79         
                
Outstanding at end of period
  322  $54.01   3.37  $2,255 
             
Exercisable and vested at end of period
  98  $48.93   2.60  $1,185 
             
Vested and expected to vest at end of period
  316  $54.04   3.37  $2,205 
             
At March 31,September 30, 2011, there was approximately $2.2$1.7 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to SSSARs that we will recognize over a weighted-average period of approximately 2.231.79 years.
Restricted Stock
Since 2008, we have used periodic grants of restricted stock as a vehicle for rewarding our nonemployee directors and certain employees with long-term incentives for their efforts in helping to create long-term shareholder value.
In February There were no grants of restricted stock during the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, we granted a total of 6,750 and 25,000 shares ofno restricted stock respectively,vested during these periods.
We recognize compensation expense over the requisite service period. Compensation cost was reflected in Cost of Sales or Selling, General and Administrative Expenses based on the grantees’ salaries expense classification and was allocated to various key employees undereach segment appropriately. We recorded tax benefits and gross windfall tax benefits related to restricted stock. Windfall tax benefits, if any, were included in the termsfinancing section of the 2005 Plan.Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The following table summarizes restricted stock compensation expense and tax benefits recorded:
         
  Three Months Ended 
  September 30 
  2011  2010 
Compensation expense $274  $318 
Tax benefits $96  $111 
Gross windfall tax benefits $  $ 
The following table summarizes the activity relating to restricted stock granted inunder the 2005 Plan for the three months ended September 30, 2011:
         
      Weighted 
  Number  Average 
  of  Grant Date 
  Shares  Fair Value 
Unvested restricted stock at beginning of period  44  $54.86 
Granted
    $ 
Vested
    $ 
Forfeited
    $ 
       
Unvested restricted stock at end of period
  44  $54.85 
       
At September 30, 2011, hadthere was approximately $1.0 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted stock that we will recognize over a grant date fair valueweighted-average period of approximately $0.4 million based on a per share closing stock price of $57.78. The restricted stock granted in 2010 had a grant date fair value of approximately $1.5 million based on a per share closing stock price of $58.79. The restricted stock under each of these grants vests on the third anniversary of the grant date. We are assuming a forfeiture rate of four percent for each of these grants. Under the terms of the grants, employees will receive dividends on unforfeited restricted stock regardless of1.60 years.

 

11


LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
their vesting status. An additional 21,500 shares of restricted stock that were granted to various key employees in February 2008 vested during the third quarter of 2011.
In November 2010, we granted a total of 8,155 shares of restricted stock to our seven nonemployee directors under the terms of the 2005 Plan. The restricted stock had a grant date fair value of approximately $0.4 million based on a per share closing stock price of $51.52. This restricted stock vests over a one-year period, and all of these shares are expected to vest. Dividends earned on the stock during the vesting period are held in escrow and will be paid to the directors at the time the stock vests. An additional 8,435 shares of restricted stock that were granted to our seven nonemployee directors in November 2009 vested during the second quarter of 2011, and the directors were paid the related dividends that had been held in escrow.
We recognize compensation expense over the requisite service period. Total compensation cost related to restricted stock for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2011 was approximately $0.3 million and $0.9 million, respectively, as compared to approximately $0.2 million and $0.6 million in the corresponding periods of the prior year. These amounts were reflected in Cost of Sales or Selling, General and Administrative Expenses based on the grantees’ salaries expense classification and were allocated to each segment appropriately. We recorded a tax benefit of approximately $0.1 million and $0.3 million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2011, respectively, as compared to approximately $0.1 million and $0.2 million in the corresponding periods of the prior year. We recorded gross windfall tax benefits of approximately $0.1 million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2011. We recorded gross windfall tax benefits of zero and less than $0.1 million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010, respectively. These windfall tax benefits were included in the financing section of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
The following table summarizes the activity relating to restricted stock granted under the 2005 Plan for the nine-month period ended March 31, 2011:
         
      Weighted 
  Number  Average 
  of  Grant Date 
  Shares  Fair Value 
Unvested restricted stock at beginning of period  61  $48.43 
Granted  15  $54.35 
Vested  (30) $41.83 
Forfeited  (2) $49.86 
        
Unvested restricted stock at end of period  44  $54.88 
        
Expected to vest restricted stock at end of period  44  $54.89 
        
At March 31, 2011, there was approximately $1.6 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted stock that we will recognize over a weighted-average period of approximately 1.88 years.
Note 8 — Restructuring and Impairment Charges
Specialty Foods Segment — Fiscal 2010
In 2010, we closed our dressings and sauces manufacturing operation located in Wilson, New York. During the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010, we recorded restructuring charges of approximately $0.1 million (less than $0.1 million after taxes) and $2.3 million ($1.5 million after taxes), respectively. The total costs associated with this plant closure were approximately $2.3 million ($1.5 million after taxes) and were mainly recorded in the first half of 2010. This closure was essentially complete at December 31, 2009. We do not expect any other restructuring costs or cash expenditures related to this closure.
Note 9 — Income Taxes
The gross tax contingency reserve at March 31,September 30, 2011 was approximately $1.5$1.8 million and consisted of tax liabilities of approximately $0.8$1.0 million and penalties and interest of approximately $0.7$0.8 million. We

12


LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
have classified approximately $0.1 million of the gross tax contingency reserve as current liabilities as these amounts are expected to be resolved within the next 12 months. The remaining liability of approximately $1.4$1.7 million is included in long-termother noncurrent liabilities. We expect that the amount of these liabilities will change within the next 12 months; however, we do not expect the change to have a significant effect on our financial position or results of operations. We recognize interest and penalties related to these tax liabilities in income tax expense.
During 2010, we executed several state tax voluntary disclosure agreements. The settlement of these liabilities resulted in pre-tax income of approximately $0.9 million, which impacted our effective tax rate for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 by approximately 0.5%.
Note 109 — Business Segment Information
The following summary of financial information by business segment is consistent with the basis of segmentation and measurement of segment profit or loss presented in our June 30, 20102011 consolidated financial statements:
                        
 Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended  Three Months Ended 
 March 31 March 31  September 30 
 2011 2010 2011 2010  2011 2010 
Net Sales
  
Specialty Foods $217,436 $216,471 $692,539 $675,911  $236,947 $220,512 
Glassware and Candles 35,187 33,857 141,373 132,692  37,569 44,539 
              
Total $252,623 $250,328 $833,912 $808,603  $274,516 $265,051 
              
 
Operating Income
 
Operating Income (Loss)
 
Specialty Foods $31,664 $38,702 $121,025 $138,000  $35,199 $37,973 
Glassware and Candles 676 1,672 5,044 9,485   (337) 2 
Corporate Expenses  (2,866)  (2,866)  (9,661)  (8,407)  (2,350)  (3,149)
              
Total $29,474 $37,508 $116,408 $139,078  $32,512 $34,826 
              
Note 1110 — Commitments and Contingencies
In addition to the items discussed below, at March 31,September 30, 2011, we were a party to various claims and litigation matters arising in the ordinary course of business. Such matters did not have a material adverse effect on the current-year results of operations and, in our opinion, their ultimate disposition will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements.
The Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (“CDSOA”) provides for the distribution of monies collected by U.S. Customs from antidumping cases to qualifying domestic producers. Our reported CDSOA receipts totaled approximately $1.0$14.4 million for fiscal year 2011 and were received in the second quarter of 2011, as compared to a distribution of approximately $0.9 million in the corresponding period of 2010. Theseand fourth quarters. CDSOA remittances have related to certain candles being imported from the People’s Republic of China.
Legislation was enacted in February 2006 to repeal the applicability of the CDSOA to duties collected on products imported after September 2007. Accordingly, we may receive some level of annual distributions for an undetermined period of years in the future as the monies collected that relate to entries filed prior to October 2007 are administratively finalized by U.S. Customs. Without further legislative action, we expect these distributions will eventually cease.
In addition to this legislative development, cases have been brought in U.S. courts challenging the CDSOA. In two separate cases, the U.S. Court of International Trade (“CIT”) ruled that the procedure for determining recipients eligible to receive CDSOA distributions is unconstitutional. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed both CIT decisions and the U.S. Supreme Court did not hear either case. This effectively ended the constitutional challenges brought in these cases, but other cases challenging CDSOA remain active.

 

1312


LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)
case. This effectively ended the constitutional challenges brought in these cases, but other cases challenging the CDSOA remain active.
Subsequent to March 31, 2011, we received notice of special CDSOA distributions totaling approximately $12.5 million, of which we have received $2.6 million and expect to receive the remainder by June 30, 2011. These distributions relate to the resolution of the constitutional challenges discussed above.
We are unable to determine, at this time, what the ultimate outcome of other litigation will be, and it is possible that further legal action, potential additional changes in the law and other factors could affect the amount of funds available for distribution, including funds relating to entries prior to October 2007. Accordingly, we cannot predict the amount of future distributions we may receive. Any change in CDSOA distributions could affect our earnings and cash flow.

 

1413


Item 2. 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Tabular dollars in thousands)
OVERVIEW
This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) describes the matters that we consider to be important in understanding the results of our operations for the three and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2011 and our financial condition as of March 31,September 30, 2011. Our fiscal year begins on July 1 and ends on June 30. Unless otherwise noted, references to “year” pertain to our fiscal year; for example, 20112012 refers to fiscal 2011,2012, which is the period from July 1, 20102011 to June 30, 2011.2012. In the discussion that follows, we analyze the results of our operations for the three and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2011, including the trends in our overall business, followed by a discussion of our financial condition.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, all included elsewhere in this report. The forward-looking statements in this section and other parts of this report involve risks and uncertainties including statements regarding our plans, objectives, goals, strategies, and financial performance. Our actual results could differ materially from the results anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of factors set forth under the caption “Forward-Looking Statements.”
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Business Overview
Lancaster Colony Corporation is a diversified manufacturer and marketer of consumer products focusing primarily on specialty foods for the retail and foodservice markets. We also manufacture and market candles for the food, drug and mass markets. Although not material to our consolidated operations, we are also engaged in the distribution of various products, including glassware and candles, to commercial markets. Our operations are organized in two reportable segments: “Specialty Foods” and “Glassware and Candles.” Over 90% of theThe sales of each segment are made to customers in the United States.predominantly domestic.
In recent years, our strategy has shifted away from operating businesses in a variety of industries towards emphasizing the growth and success we have achieved in our Specialty Foods segment. Fiscal years prior to 2009 were significant years in implementing this strategy as we divested various nonfood operations and focused our capital investment in the Specialty Foods segment.
We view our food operations as having the potential to achieve future growth in sales and profitability due to attributes such as:
  leading retail market positions in several branded products with a high-quality perception;
 
  a broad customer base in both retail and foodservice accounts;
 
  well-regarded culinary expertise among foodservice accounts;
 
  recognized leadership in foodservice product development;
 
  demonstrated experience in integrating complementary business acquisitions; and
 
  historically strong cash flow generation that supports growth opportunities.
Our goal is to grow our specialty foods retail and foodservice business over time by:
leveraging the strength of our retail brands to increase current product sales and introduce new products;
growing our foodservice sales through the strength of our reputation in product development and quality; and
pursuing acquisitions that meet our strategic criteria.
leveraging the strength of our retail brands to increase current product sales and introduce new products;
growing our foodservice sales through the strength of our reputation in product development and quality; and
pursuing acquisitions that meet our strategic criteria.

 

1514


We have made substantial capital investments to support our existing food operations and future growth opportunities. Based on our current plans and expectations, including a current plant expansion at our Kentucky frozen roll facility, we believe that total capital expenditures for 2011 will approach $402012 are not expected to exceed $23 million.
Summary of 20112012 Results
The following is a comparative overview of our consolidated operating results for the three and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2011 and 2010.
Net sales for the third quarterthree months ended March 31,September 30, 2011 increased 1%4% to approximately $252.6$274.5 million from the prior-year total of $250.3$265.1 million. This sales growthincrease reflects higher sales in both operating segments.the Specialty Foods segment as partially offset by a decline in sales of the Glassware and Candles segment. The Specialty Foods segment’s increase reflects higher retail and foodservice sales, which were partially offset by lower retail sales. The increasedecrease in sales of the Glassware and Candles segment primarily reflects product placement with new customers. lower unit volume.
Gross margin decreased 15%5% to approximately $52.5$55.4 million from the prior-year third quarter total of $61.9$58.1 million. Increasing raw-materialSubstantially higher material costs as well as a less favorable sales mix and higher freight costs within the Specialty Foods segment, contributed to the lower gross margin.
Net income for the three months ended March 31, 2011 totaledquarter was approximately $19.4$21.3 million, or $.71$.78 per diluted share. Net income totaled approximately $24.2share, compared to $22.8 million, or $.81 per diluted share, in the third quarter of 2010, or $.86 per diluted share.
Year-to-date net sales for the period ended March 31, 2011 increased 3% to approximately $833.9 million from the prior year-to-date total of $808.6 million. Gross margin decreased to approximately $188.8 million from the prior year-to-date total of $210.4 million. Net income for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 totaled approximately $77.1 million, or $2.77 per diluted share. Net income totaled approximately $92.2 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2010, or $3.27 per diluted share.year.
RESULTS OF CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS
Net Sales and Gross Margin
                                                
 Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended    Three Months Ended   
 March 31 March 31    September 30   
 2011 2010 Change 2011 2010 Change  2011 2010 Change 
Net Sales
  
Specialty Foods $217,436 $216,471 $965  0% $692,539 $675,911 $16,628  2% $236,947 $220,512 $16,435  7%
Glassware and Candles 35,187 33,857 1,330  4% 141,373 132,692 8,681  7% 37,569 44,539  (6,970)  (16)%
                          
Total $252,623 $250,328 $2,295  1% $833,912 $808,603 $25,309  3% $274,516 $265,051 $9,465  4%
                          
Gross Margin
 $52,534 $61,923 $(9,389)  (15)% $188,849 $210,407 $(21,558)  (10)% $55,430 $58,071 $(2,641)  (5)%
                          
Gross Margin as a Percentage of Sales
  20.8%  24.7%  22.6%  26.0%   20.2%  21.9% 
                  
Consolidated net sales for the thirdfirst quarter and nine months ended March 31, 2011 increased 1% and 3%4%, respectively, reflecting higher sales in both operating segments.the Specialty Foods segment as partially offset by lower sales in the Glassware and Candles segment.
For the three and nine monthsquarter ended March 31,September 30, 2011, net sales of the Specialty Foods segment increased by less than 1% andtotaled approximately 2%, respectively. Contribution$236.9 million, an increase of 7% from the prior-year total of $220.5 million. Higher product pricing totaled approximately five percent of segment net sales. In addition to the higher pricing, for these respective periods was approximately 2% and less than 1%.retail sales also reflected the incremental benefit from some recently-introduced or newer food products. Sales volumes were also higher among branded retail products, especially frozen items. The segment’s foodservice net sales rose approximately 12% and 9% for the three and nine month periods, respectively,also increased on increasedexpanded volumes particularly from new programs with existing large chain restaurants, and higher pricing. Retail net sales for the nine month period were approximately 3% lower than the prior-year comparative period as influenced by the prior year rationalization of some product lines associated with the December 2009 closing of one of our dressing facilities. Retail net sales for the three-month period declined by approximately 9%, reflecting weaker demand for certain product lines, especially frozen rolls and refrigerated dips. The later Easter holiday occurring in 2011 also affected the sales comparisons, with the impact being estimated to total approximately 3% and 1%, respectively, of the segment’s net sales for the three and nine month periods. The later Easter timing should improve retail sales comparisons for the three months ended June 30, 2011, although the ultimate effect on demand from recently implemented pricing actions is uncertain.programs among existing customers.
The increase in netNet sales of the Glassware and Candles segment for both the three and nine monthsquarter ended MarchSeptember 30, 2011 totaled approximately $37.6 million, a 16% decrease from the prior-year total of $44.5 million. The decline in net sales was influenced by the exiting of some lower-margin business, including some seasonal candle programs, with higher pricing helping to offset some of these declines. We expect this segment’s sales to again markedly decline in the quarter ending December 31, 2011, primarily reflected the additionas a result of new customer accounts.lower seasonal sales of candles.

16


As a percentage of sales, our consolidated gross margin for the three and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2011 was 20.8% and 22.6%20.2%, respectively, as compared to 24.7% and 26.0%21.9% achieved in the prior-year comparative periods.period. Higher raw-material costs contributed to the lower percentage.
In the Specialty Foods segment, gross margin percentages declined in bothfor the three and nine months ended March 31, 2011,quarter, reflecting comparatively higher ingredient costs (especially for soybean oil dairy products, sugar and eggs)flour), as partially offset by higher distribution costs, a less favorable sales mix and lower production levels within our frozen roll operations.pricing. We estimate that higher material costs adversely affected our gross margins in these periods by approximately 3% and 2%seven percent of segment net sales, respectively. The increase in freight and warehousing costs were, in part, influenced by higher diesel costs.sales. Looking forward, we see higher material and freight costs continuing to persist, presenting a comparative challenge to the fourth fiscal quarter. Based onunder current market conditions, we expectsee our material costs

15


continuing to offset mostpose a comparative challenge through the second quarter of 2012, but anticipate less of an impact for the second half of the higher material costs with the benefit of recent price increases, including various retail pricing actions taken late in the third fiscal quarter.year.
Despite the benefits of achieving higher sales volumes, grossGross margin percentages in the Glassware and Candles segment declined slightly from the prior-year periodsperiod primarily due to the impact of continued higher wax costs, which we believe are likelylower sales and reduced production levels. These factors were somewhat mitigated by higher pricing and an improved sales mix. We expect the segment’s gross margins to persist and adversely affect comparative resultsremain similarly challenged through at least the endsecond quarter of our fiscal 2011. This segment also experienced a less favorable sales mix.2012.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
                
                                 Three Months Ended   
 Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended    September 30   
 March 31 March 31    2011 2010 Change 
 2011 2010 Change 2011 2010 Change 
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
 $23,060 $24,328 $(1,268)  (5)% $72,441 $69,196 $3,245  5% $22,918 $23,245 $(327)  (1)%
                          
SG&A Expenses as a Percentage of Sales
  9.1%  9.7%  8.7%  8.6%   8.3%  8.8% 
                  
Consolidated selling, general and administrative costs of approximately $23.1 million and $72.4$22.9 million for the three and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2011 decreased by 5% and increased by 5%, respectively,1% from the $24.3$23.2 million and $69.2 million incurred for the three and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2010, respectively. The third quarter decrease reflectsand were lower consumer-directed marketing expenses and professional fees withinas a percentage of sales compared to the Specialty Foods segment. Higher sales-based expenses, increased compensation expense, greatersame period in the prior year due to lower consumer-directed marketing costs and higherlower corporate expenses related to idle real estate contributed to the overall increaseavailable for the nine months ended March 31, 2011.sale.
Restructuring and Impairment Charges
Specialty Foods Segment — Fiscal 2010
In 2010, we closed our dressings and sauces manufacturing operation located in Wilson, New York. During the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010, we recorded restructuring charges of approximately $0.1 million (less than $0.1 million after taxes) and $2.3 million ($1.5 million after taxes), respectively. The total costs associated with this plant closure were approximately $2.3 million ($1.5 million after taxes) and were mainly recorded in the first half of 2010. This closure was essentially complete at December 31, 2009. We do not expect any other restructuring costs or cash expenditures related to this closure.

17


Operating Income (Loss)
The foregoing factors contributed to consolidated operating income totaling approximately $29.5 million and $116.4$32.5 million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2011, respectively. These amounts represent decreases of 21% and 16%, respectively, from the corresponding periods of the prior year.September 30, 2011. By segment, our operating income can be summarized as follows:
                                 
  Three Months Ended          Nine Months Ended    
  March 31          March 31    
  2011  2010  Change  2011  2010  Change 
Operating Income
                                
Specialty Foods $31,664  $38,702  $(7,038)  (18)% $121,025  $138,000  $(16,975)  (12)%
Glassware and Candles  676   1,672   (996)  (60)%  5,044   9,485   (4,441)  (47)%
Corporate Expenses  (2,866)  (2,866)     0%  (9,661)  (8,407)  (1,254)  15%
                         
Total $29,474  $37,508  $(8,034)  (21)% $116,408  $139,078  $(22,670)  (16)%
                         
Operating Income as a Percentage of Sales                            
Specialty Foods  14.6%  17.9%          17.5%  20.4%        
Glassware and Candles  1.9%  4.9%          3.6%  7.1%        
Consolidated  11.7%  15.0%          14.0%  17.2%        
Other Income — Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act
The Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (“CDSOA”) provides for the distribution of monies collected by U.S. Customs from antidumping cases to qualifying domestic producers. Our reported CDSOA receipts totaled approximately $1.0 million in the second quarter of 2011, as compared to a distribution of approximately $0.9 million in the corresponding period of 2010. These remittances related to certain candles being imported from the People’s Republic of China.
Legislation was enacted in February 2006 to repeal the applicability of the CDSOA to duties collected on products imported after September 2007. Accordingly, we may receive some level of annual distributions for an undetermined period of years in the future as the monies collected that relate to entries filed prior to October 2007 are administratively finalized by U.S. Customs. Without further legislative action, we expect these distributions will eventually cease.
In addition to this legislative development, cases have been brought in U.S. courts challenging the CDSOA. In two separate cases, the U.S. Court of International Trade (“CIT”) ruled that the procedure for determining recipients eligible to receive CDSOA distributions is unconstitutional. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed both CIT decisions and the U.S. Supreme Court did not hear either case. This effectively ended the constitutional challenges brought in these cases, but other cases challenging the CDSOA remain active.
Subsequent to March 31, 2011, we received notice of special CDSOA distributions totaling approximately $12.5 million, of which we have received $2.6 million and expect to receive the remainder by June 30, 2011. These distributions relate to the resolution of the constitutional challenges discussed above.
We are unable to determine, at this time, what the ultimate outcome of other litigation will be, and it is possible that further legal action, potential additional changes in the law and other factors could affect the amount of funds available for distribution, including funds relating to entries prior to October 2007. Accordingly, we cannot predict the amount of future distributions we may receive. Any change in CDSOA distributions could affect our earnings and cash flow.
                 
  Three Months Ended    
  September 30    
  2011  2010  Change 
Operating Income (Loss)
                
Specialty Foods $35,199  $37,973  $(2,774)  (7)%
Glassware and Candles  (337)  2   (339)  N/M 
Corporate Expenses  (2,350)  (3,149)  799   (25)%
             
Total $32,512  $34,826  $(2,314)  (7)%
             
Operating Income (Loss) as a Percentage of Sales
                
Specialty Foods  14.9%  17.2%        
Glassware and Candles  (0.9)%  %        
Consolidated  11.8%  13.1%        
Interest Income and Other — Net
Interest income and other was less than $0.1 million and approximately $0.1 million for the threequarters ended September 30, 2011 and nine months ended March 31, 2011, respectively, as compared to less than $0.1 million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010.

18


Income Before Income Taxes
As impacted by the factors discussed above, income before income taxes for the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2011 decreased by approximately $8.0$2.3 million to $29.5$32.5 million from the prior-year total of $37.5$34.8 million. Income before income taxes for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $117.5 million and $140.0 million, respectively. Our effective tax rate of 34.4%34.6% for the ninethree months ended March 31,September 30, 2011 increased slightly fromwas comparable to the prior-year rate of 34.2%34.7%. This increase reflected, in part, the prior-year favorable resolution of certain previously-reserved state tax matters, as further discussed in Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements.
Net Income
ThirdFirst quarter net income for 20112012 of approximately $19.4$21.3 million decreased from the preceding year’sprior-year’s net income for the quarter of $24.2$22.8 million, as influenced by the factors noted above. Year-to-date net income of approximately $77.1 million was lower than the prior year-to-date total of $92.2 million. Net income per share for the thirdfirst quarter of 20112012 totaled $.71approximately $.78 per basic and diluted share, as compared to $.86$.81 per basic and diluted share recorded in the prior year. Year-to-date net income per share was $2.77 per basic and diluted share, as compared to $3.27 per basic and diluted share for the prior-year period.

16


FINANCIAL CONDITION
For the ninethree months ended March 31,September 30, 2011, net cash provided by operating activities totaled approximately $98.0$17.6 million as compared to $86.9$9.3 million in the prior-year period. The increase results from the relative changes in working capital, includingparticularly the effectlower level of routine differencesinventory held in the timingGlassware and amounts associated with our Federal income tax accruals and payments, as partially offset by lower net income.Candles segment. The increase in receivables since June 20102011 primarily relates to seasonal influences on sales within the strength ofGlassware and Candles segment but is also impacted by higher sales in March relative to June.the Specialty Foods segment.
Cash used in investing activities for the ninethree months ended March 31,September 30, 2011 was approximately $26.6$4.7 million as compared to $9.0$6.3 million in the prior year. This increasedecrease reflects a higherlower level of capital expenditures in 2011 due to2012 as we substantially completed the expansion of our frozen roll facility in Kentucky. This project is anticipated to be completed by the middle of calendarKentucky during June 2011.
Cash used in financing activities for the ninethree months ended March 31,September 30, 2011 of approximately $64.6$16.9 million increased slightly from the prior-year total of $20.7 million$16.4 million. This increase was due primarily to the relative changes in the cash overdraft balance and higher dividend payments, as partially offset by a higherlower level of share repurchases and lower proceeds fromin the exercise of stock awards.current year. At March 31,September 30, 2011, approximately 1,679,0001,483,000 shares remained authorized for future buyback under the existing share repurchase program.
Under our unsecured revolving credit facility, we may borrow up to a maximum of $160 million at any one time. Loans may be used for general corporate purposes. We had no borrowings outstanding under this facility at March 31,September 30, 2011. The facility expires in October 2012, and all outstanding amounts are then due and payable. At March 31,September 30, 2011, we had approximately $6.6$6.7 million of standby letters of credit outstanding, which reducereduced the amount available for borrowing on the unsecured revolving credit facility.
The facility contains certain restrictive covenants, including limitations on indebtedness, asset sales and acquisitions, and financial covenants relating to interest coverage and leverage. At March 31,September 30, 2011, we were in compliance with all applicable provisions and covenants of the facility, and we met the requirements of the financial covenants by substantial margins.
We currently expect to remain in compliance with the facility’s covenants for the foreseeable future. A default under the facility could accelerate the repayment of any outstanding indebtedness and limit our access to additional credit available under the facility. Such an event could require curtailment of cash dividends or share repurchases, reduce or delay beneficial expansion or investment plans, or otherwise impact our ability to meet our obligations when due. At March 31,September 30, 2011, we were not aware of any event that would constitute a default under the facility.
We believe that internally generated funds and our existing aggregate balances in cash and equivalents, in addition to our currently available bank credit arrangements, should be adequate to meet our foreseeable cash requirements. If we were to borrow outside of our credit facility under current market terms, our average interest rate may increase significantly and have an adverse effect on our results of operations.
For additional information regarding our credit facility, see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.

19


CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
We have various contractual obligations that are appropriately recorded as liabilities in our consolidated financial statements. Certain other items, such as purchase obligations, are not recognized as liabilities in our consolidated financial statements. Examples of items not recognized as liabilities in our consolidated financial statements are commitments to purchase raw materials or inventory that have not yet been received as of March 31,September 30, 2011 and future minimum lease payments for the use of property and equipment under operating lease agreements. Aside from expected changes in raw-material needs due to changes in product demand, and the planned plant expansion noted in the following paragraph, there have been no significant changes to the contractual obligations disclosed in our 20102011 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
In August 2010, Sister Schubert’s Homemade Rolls, Inc. (“SS”), an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of ours, entered into a Construction Contract (the “Contract”) with Gray Construction, Inc. (“Gray”) for an addition to the existing SS production facility located in Hart County, Kentucky. Subject to certain conditions, the Contract provides that the total cost to be charged SS for Gray’s work is not to exceed a guaranteed maximum price of approximately $13 million. The Contract was included as Exhibit 10.1 on our Form 8-K, which was filed on August 27, 2010. As of March 31, 2011, we were still obligated for approximately $4 million under the Contract and we had equipment purchase commitments of approximately $4 million outstanding.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
There have been no changes in critical accounting policies from those disclosed in our 20102011 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

17


RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
There were no recentlyIn September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued accounting pronouncementsAccounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-09,“Compensation — Retirement Benefits — Multiemployer Plans: Disclosures about an Employer’s Participation in a Multiemployer Plan”(“ASU 11-09”). This ASU requires that employers provide additional separate quantitative and qualitative disclosures for multiemployer pension plans and multiemployer other postretirement benefit plans. ASU 11-09 will be effective for annual periods for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08,“Intangibles — Goodwill and Other: Testing Goodwill for Impairment”(“ASU 11-08”). This ASU permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. The entity is not required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying value. ASU 11-08 will be effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05,“Comprehensive Income: Presentation of Comprehensive Income”(“ASU 11-05”). This ASU amends current comprehensive income guidance to eliminate the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of shareholders equity. Instead, it requires entities to report components of comprehensive income in either (1) a continuous statement of comprehensive income or (2) two separate but consecutive statements. ASU 11-05 will be effective for public companies for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
We desire to take advantage of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “PSLRA”). This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains various “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the PSLRA and other applicable securities laws. Such statements can be identified by the use of the forward-looking words “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project,” “believe,” “intend,” “plan,” “expect,” “hope” or similar words. These statements discuss future expectations; contain projections regarding future developments, operations or financial conditions; or state other forward-looking information. Such statements are based upon assumptions and assessments made by us in light of our experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors we believe to be appropriate. These forward-looking statements involve various important risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ as a result of factors over which we have no, or limited, control including, without limitation, the specific influences outlined below. Management believes these forward-looking statements to be reasonable; however, you should not place undue reliance on such statements that are based on current expectations. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update such forward-looking statements.statements, except as required by law. More detailed statements regarding significant events that could affect our financial results are included in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K and also our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are available on our website at www.lancastercolony.com.
Specific influences relating to these forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:
  the potential for loss of larger programs or key customer relationships;
 
  the effect of consolidation of customers within key market channels;
 
  the continued solvency of key customers;
 
  the success and cost of new product development efforts;
 
  the lack of market acceptance of new products;

20


  the reaction of customers or consumers to the effect of price increases we may implement;
changes in demand for our products, which may result from loss of brand reputation or customer goodwill;

18


changes in demand for our products, which may result from loss of brand reputation or customer goodwill;
  changes in market trends;
 
  the extent to which future business acquisitions are completed and acceptably integrated;
 
  the possible occurrence of product recalls or other defective or mislabeled product costs;
efficiencies in plant operations, including the ability to optimize overhead utilization in candle operations;
efficiencies in plant operations, including the ability to optimize overhead utilization in candle operations;
  the overall strength of the economy;
 
  changes in financial markets;
 
  slower than anticipated sales growth;
 
  the extent of operational efficiencies achieved;
 
  price and product competition;
the uncertainty regarding the effect or outcome of any decision to explore further strategic alternatives among our nonfood operations;
fluctuations in the cost and availability of raw materials;
adverse changes in energy costs and other factors that may affect costs of producing, distributing or transporting our products;
the impact of fluctuations in our pension plan asset values on funding levels, contributions required and benefit costs;
the uncertainty regarding the effect or outcome of any decision to explore further strategic alternatives among our nonfood operations;
fluctuations in the cost and availability of raw materials;
adverse changes in energy costs and other factors that may affect costs of producing, distributing or transporting our products;
the impact of fluctuations in our pension plan asset values on funding levels, contributions required and benefit costs;
  maintenance of competitive position with respect to other manufacturers, including import sources of production;
 
  dependence on key personnel;
 
  stability of labor relations;
 
  dependence on contract copackers and limited or exclusive sources for certain goods;
 
  effect of governmental regulations, including environmental matters;
  legislation and litigation affecting the future administration of the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000;
 
  access to any required financing;
 
  changes in income tax laws;
 
  unknown costs relating to the holding or disposition of idle real estate;
 
  changes in estimates in critical accounting judgments;
the outcome of any litigation or arbitration; and
 
  innumerable other factors.
Item 3. 
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our market risks have not changed materially from those disclosed in our 20102011 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 4. 
Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer evaluated, with the participation of management, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)). Based upon this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31,September 30, 2011 to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is 1) recorded, processed,

21


summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and 2) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our

19


Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, in a manner that allows timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.No changes were made to our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during our most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART IIOTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. 
Risk Factors
There have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed under Item 1A in our 20102011 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 2. 
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(c) In November 2010, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase authorization of 2,000,000 shares, of which approximately 1,679,0001,483,000 shares remained authorized for future repurchases at March 31,September 30, 2011. This share repurchase authorization does not have a stated expiration date. In the thirdfirst quarter, we made the following repurchases of our common stock:
                 
          Total Number    
  Total  Average  of Shares  Maximum Number 
  Number  Price  Purchased as  of Shares That May 
  of Shares  Paid Per  Part of Publicly  Yet be Purchased 
Period Purchased  Share  Announced Plans  Under the Plans 
                 
January 1–31, 2011  70,163  $54.34   70,163   1,852,822 
February 1–28, 2011(1)
  92,374  $57.52   92,374   1,760,448 
March 1–31, 2011  81,904  $56.51   81,904   1,678,544 
               
 
Total  244,441  $56.27   244,441   1,678,544 
               
                 
          Total Number    
  Total  Average  of Shares  Maximum Number 
  Number  Price  Purchased as  of Shares That May 
  of Shares  Paid Per  Part of Publicly  Yet be Purchased 
Period Purchased  Share  Announced Plans  Under the Plans 
 
July 1-31, 2011    $      1,618,350 
August 1-31, 2011  75,221  $57.57   75,221   1,543,129 
September 1-30, 2011  60,178  $59.14   60,178   1,482,951 
             
Total  135,399  $58.27   135,399   1,482,951 
             
(1)Includes 7,128 shares that were repurchased in satisfaction of tax withholding obligations arising from the vesting of restricted stock granted to employees under the Lancaster Colony Corporation 2005 Stock Plan.
Item 6. 
Exhibits
See Index to Exhibits following Signatures.

 

22

20


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
     
 Lancaster Colony Corporation

(Registrant)
 
 
Date: May 10,November 7, 2011 By:  /s/John B. Gerlach, Jr.   
  John B. Gerlach, Jr.  
  Chairman, Chief Executive Officer,
President and Director
(Principal (Principal Executive Officer)
 
 
   
Date: May 10,November 7, 2011 By:  /s/John L. Boylan   
  John L. Boylan  
  Treasurer, Vice President, Assistant
Assistant Secretary,
Chief Financial Officer and Director
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 
 

 

2321


LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
MARCH 31,SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
       
Exhibit    
Number Description Located at
 
10.1*Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for employees and consultants under the Lancaster Colony Corporation 2005 Stock PlanFiled herewith
10.2*Form of Stock Appreciation Rights Award Agreement for employees and consultants under the Lancaster Colony Corporation 2005 Stock PlanFiled herewith
 31.1  Certification of CEO under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Filed herewith
 
 31.2  Certification of CFO under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Filed herewith
 
 32  Certification of CEO and CFO under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Filed herewith
 
101.INS  XBRL Instance Document Furnished herewith
 
101.SCH  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document Furnished herewith
 
101.CAL  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document Furnished herewith
 
101.DEF  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document Furnished herewith
 
101.LAB  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document Furnished herewith
 
101.PRE  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document Furnished herewith
*Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement in which any Director or any Executive Officer participates.

 

2422