UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

~~Washington,~~WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

~~Form~~FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED ~~JUNE~~SEPTEMBER 30, 2011

Commission File Number001-16407

ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

13-4151777

~~Delaware~~

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

~~13-4151777~~

(IRS Employer

Identification No.)

345 East Main Street, Warsaw, IN 46580

(Address of principal executive offices)

Telephone:(574) 267-6131

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þx No o¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 ofRegulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þx No o¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated ~~filer, or a smaller reporting company.~~filer. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” inRule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. ~~(Check one):~~


Large accelerated filer þx	Accelerated filer o¨	Non-accelerated filer o¨	Smaller reporting company o¨
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

~~(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)~~

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined inRule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o¨ No þx

As of ~~July 25,~~October 26, 2011, ~~190,474,286~~179,176,972 shares of the registrant’s $.01 par value common stock were outstanding.

ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC.

INDEX TOFORM 10-Q

~~June~~September 30, 2011


			Page

		Part I — Financial Information
	~~Item 1.~~
Item 1.		Condensed Financial Statements

			Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the Three and ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and 2010		3
			Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010		4
			Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and 2010		5
			Notes to Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		6
	Item 2.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		22
	Item 3.		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		3233
	Item 4.		Controls and Procedures		33


			Part II — Other Information
			There is no information required to be reported under any items except those indicated ~~below~~below.
Item 1.		Legal Proceedings		34
Item 1A.		~~Item 1.~~Risk Factors		~~Legal Proceedings~~		3334
	Item ~~1A.~~2.		~~Risk Factors~~		33
	~~Item 2.~~		Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		33
	~~Item 5.~~		~~Other Information~~		34
	Item 6.5.		~~Exhibits~~Other Information		34
Item 6.		~~Signatures~~Exhibits		35
~~EX-31.1~~Signatures
~~EX-31.2~~
~~EX-32~~
~~EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT~~36
~~EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT~~
~~EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT~~
~~EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT~~
~~EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT~~
~~EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT~~

Part I — Financial Information


Item 1.	*Financial Statements*

ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

(Inin millions, except per share amounts, unaudited)

Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended

June 30, June 30,
2011 2010 2011 2010

Net Sales
$ 1,137.4 $ 1,057.7 $ 2,253.0 $ 2,120.5
Cost of products sold 287.9 250.6 566.9 519.0

Gross Profit
849.5 807.1 1,686.1 1,601.5

Research and development 57.0 54.2 112.6 104.7
Selling, general and administrative 469.9 438.3 928.2 885.5
Certain claims (Note 15) 50.0 75.0 50.0 75.0
Special items (Note 2) 13.5 11.5 39.0 14.1

Operating expenses 590.4 579.0 1,129.8 1,079.3

Operating Profit
259.1 228.1 556.3 522.2
Interest expense, net 9.8 14.3 20.8 28.9

Earnings before income taxes 249.3 213.8 535.5 493.3
Provision for income taxes 45.5 48.3 122.8 122.4

Net Earnings of Zimmer Holdings, Inc.
$ 203.8 $ 165.5 $ 412.7 $ 370.9

Earnings Per Common Share

Basic $ 1.06 $ 0.82 $ 2.15 $ 1.83
Diluted $ 1.06 $ 0.82 $ 2.14 $ 1.82
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding

Basic 191.5 201.9 192.1 202.4
Diluted 192.7 203.0 193.3 203.6


	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010		2011			2010
Net Sales	$	1,031.5		$	965.0	$	3,284.5		$	3,085.5
Cost of products sold		251.9			219.1		818.8			738.1

Gross Profit		779.6			745.9		2,465.7			2,347.4

Research and development		61.0			57.3		173.6			162.0
Selling, general and administrative		444.0			412.0		1,372.2			1,297.5
Certain claims (Note 14)		—			—		50.0			75.0
Special items (Note 2)		8.0			5.0		47.0			19.1

Operating expenses		513.0			474.3		1,642.8			1,553.6

Operating Profit		266.6			271.6		822.9			793.8
Interest expense, net		11.7			14.2		32.5			43.1

Earnings before income taxes		254.9			257.4		790.4			750.7
Provision for income taxes		63.7			66.3		186.5			188.7

Net earnings		191.2			191.1		603.9			562.0
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest		(0.3	)		—		(0.3	)		—

Net Earnings of Zimmer Holdings, Inc.	$	191.5		$	191.1	$	604.2		$	562.0

Earnings Per Common Share
Basic	$	1.02		$	0.96	$	3.17		$	2.79
Diluted	$	1.01		$	0.96	$	3.15		$	2.78
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding
Basic		187.7			198.7		190.6			201.2
Diluted		188.8			199.7		191.8			202.3

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Inin millions, unaudited)

June 30,
December 31,

2011 2010

ASSETS
Current Assets:

Cash and cash equivalents $ 624.1 $ 668.9
Short-term investments 321.4 265.1
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts 888.4 775.9
Inventories, net 975.1 936.4
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 66.7 127.7
Deferred income taxes 232.6 235.7

Total Current Assets 3,108.3 3,009.7
Property, plant and equipment, net 1,213.0 1,213.8
Goodwill 2,694.0 2,580.8
Intangible assets, net 811.5 827.1
Other assets 422.4 368.5

Total Assets
$ 8,249.2 $ 7,999.9

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities:

Accounts payable $ 124.0 $ 129.6
Income taxes 31.1 48.9
Other current liabilities 523.9 524.0

Total Current Liabilities 679.0 702.5
Other long-term liabilities 407.1 384.0
Long-term debt 1,147.3 1,142.1

Total Liabilities
2,233.4 2,228.6

Commitments and Contingencies (Note 15)

Stockholders’ Equity:

Common stock, $0.01 par value, one billion shares authorized, 255.5 million (254.6 million in 2010) issued 2.5 2.5
Paid-in capital 3,355.4 3,293.5
Retained earnings 6,111.3 5,699.4
Accumulated other comprehensive income 447.5 321.0
Treasury stock, 65.1 million shares (59.0 million shares in 2010) (3,900.9 ) (3,545.1 )

Total Stockholders’ Equity
6,015.8 5,771.3

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
$ 8,249.2 $ 7,999.9


	September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	553.0		$	668.9
Short-term investments		424.9			265.1
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts		827.9			775.9
Inventories		968.4			936.4
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		68.5			127.7
Deferred income taxes		230.6			235.7

Total Current Assets		3,073.3			3,009.7
Property, plant and equipment, net		1,210.3			1,213.8
Goodwill		2,634.3			2,580.8
Intangible assets, net		794.7			827.1
Other assets		486.2			368.5

Total Assets	$	8,198.8		$	7,999.9


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	108.6		$	129.6
Income taxes		39.6			48.9
Other current liabilities		526.4			524.0

Total Current Liabilities		674.6			702.5
Other long-term liabilities		372.0			384.0
Long-term debt		1,543.5			1,142.1

Total Liabilities		2,590.1			2,228.6

Commitments and Contingencies (Note 14)
Stockholders’ Equity:
Zimmer Holdings, Inc. Stockholders’ Equity:
Common stock, $0.01 par value, one billion shares authorized, 255.6 million shares issued in 2011 (254.6 million in 2010)		2.5			2.5
Paid-in capital		3,375.3			3,293.5
Retained earnings		6,302.8			5,699.4
Accumulated other comprehensive income		370.1			321.0
Treasury stock, 75.2 million shares (59.0 million shares in 2010)		(4,450.2	)		(3,545.1	)

Total Zimmer Holdings, Inc. stockholders’ equity		5,600.5			5,771.3
Noncontrolling interest		8.2			—

Total Stockholders’ Equity		5,608.7			5,771.3

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	8,198.8		$	7,999.9

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

~~CONSENSED~~CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Inin millions, unaudited)

For the Six Months

Ended June 30,
2011 2010

Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities:

Net earnings of Zimmer Holdings, Inc. $ 412.7 $ 370.9
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 174.7 165.8
Share-based compensation 31.7 30.6
Income tax benefit from stock option exercises 9.5 2.9
Excess income tax benefit from stock option exercises (3.6 ) (1.0 )
Inventorystep-up
7.8 1.3
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions:
Income taxes (11.5 ) (70.5 )
Receivables (76.0 ) (51.3 )
Inventories (21.8 ) 27.5
Accounts payable and accrued expenses (42.2 ) (37.4 )
Other assets and liabilities (48.1 ) 93.4

Net cash provided by operating activities 433.2 532.2

Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities:

Additions to instruments (85.2 ) (83.1 )
Additions to other property, plant and equipment (34.0 ) (26.7 )
Purchases of investments (186.7 ) (4.0 )
Sales of investments 169.8 37.0
Investments in other assets (26.4 ) (15.1 )

Net cash used in investing activities (162.5 ) (91.9 )

Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities:

Net proceeds under revolving credit facilities 0.2 —
Proceeds from employee stock compensation plans 29.1 8.1
Excess income tax benefit from stock option exercises 3.6 1.0
Repurchase of common stock (357.2 ) (178.9 )

Net cash used in financing activities (324.3 ) (169.8 )

Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents 8.8 (8.5 )

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (44.8 ) 262.0
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 668.9 691.7

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 624.1 $ 953.7


	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010
Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities:
Net earnings	$	603.9		$	562.0
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		265.6			249.5
Share-based compensation		46.1			45.4
Income tax benefit from stock option exercises		10.6			3.4
Excess income tax benefit from stock option exercises		(4.0	)		(1.1	)
Inventory step-up		9.6			1.3
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions:
Income taxes		6.8			(69.3	)
Receivables		(39.7	)		(13.1	)
Inventories		(27.7	)		6.9
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(41.3	)		(9.1	)
Other assets and liabilities		(46.1	)		76.6

Net cash provided by operating activities		783.8			852.5

Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities:
Additions to instruments		(128.9	)		(133.1	)
Additions to other property, plant and equipment		(67.8	)		(40.6	)
Purchases of investments		(403.8	)		(100.6	)
Sales of investments		225.0			56.5
Investments in other assets		(35.6	)		(17.6	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(411.1	)		(235.4	)

Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities:
Net proceeds under revolving credit facilities		375.2			—
Proceeds from employee stock compensation plans		34.0			12.9
Excess income tax benefit from stock option exercises		4.0			1.1
Repurchase of common stock		(906.5	)		(404.6	)

Net cash used in financing activities		(493.3	)		(390.6	)

Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents		4.7			0.4

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(115.9	)		226.9
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year		668.9			691.7

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	553.0		$	918.6

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.
1.	Basis of Presentation

The financial data presented herein is unaudited and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in the 2010 Annual Report onForm 10-K filed by Zimmer Holdings, Inc. The condensed consolidated financial statements for the majority of our international subsidiaries are for periods that ended on September 25, 2011 and 2010. For these international subsidiaries, the three month results included in these condensed consolidated financial statements are for the period of June 26 to September 25 and the nine month results are for the period of December 26 through September 25 or the period of January 1 through September 25.

In our opinion, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The December 31, 2010 condensed balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Results for interim periods should not be considered indicative of results for the full year. Certain amounts in the 2010 condensed consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2011 presentation.

In the three month period ended September 30, 2011, we acquired a controlling financial interest, but not an exclusive financial interest, in Zfx GmbH. This acquisition will expand our presence in the digital dentistry arena. Further information about the acquisition of this controlling financial interest has not been presented because it did not have a material effect on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

The words “we,” “us,” “our” and similar words refer to Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Zimmer Holdings refers to the parent company only.

2.
2.	Significant Accounting Policies

Special Items — We recognize expenses resulting directly from our business combinations, employee termination benefits, certain contract terminations, consulting fees and asset impairment charges connected with global restructuring, quality excellence and transformation initiatives, and other items as “Special items” in our condensed consolidated statement of earnings. “Special items” included (in millions):

Three Months
Six Months

Ended
Ended

June 30, June 30,
2011 2010 2011 2010

Impairment/loss on disposal of assets $ 0.4 $ 7.7 $ 2.9 $ 8.1
Consulting and professional fees 4.9 0.9 8.4 1.9
Employee severance and retention 3.6 2.3 19.8 2.2
Information technology integration — — — 0.1
Facility and employee relocation 0.6 0.5 0.9 0.5
Distributor acquisitions 0.5 — 1.1 —
Certain litigation matters — (0.5 ) 0.1 (1.3 )
Contract terminations 1.7 0.6 2.7 2.6
Other 1.8 — 3.1 —

Special items $ 13.5 $ 11.5 $ 39.0 $ 14.1


	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010		2011		2010
Impairment/loss on disposal of assets	$	0.3		$	—	$	3.2	$	8.1
Consulting and professional fees		3.2			0.7		11.6		2.6
Employee severance and retention		1.1			0.8		20.9		3.0
Information technology integration		—			—		—		0.1
Facility and employee relocation		(0.2	)		—		0.7		0.5
Vacated facilities		—			0.2		—		0.2
Distributor acquisitions		0.5			0.8		1.6		0.8
Certain litigation matters		—			1.0		0.1		(0.3	)
Contract terminations		1.8			0.6		4.5		3.2
Other		1.3			0.9		4.4		0.9

Special items	$	8.0		$	5.0	$	47.0	$	19.1

In the first ~~six~~nine months of 2011 we terminated employees as part of a reduction of management layers, expansion of management spans of control, and changes in our organizational structure. Approximately 500 employees from across the globe were affected by these actions. As a result, we incurred expenses related to

ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

severance benefits, share-based compensation acceleration and other employee termination-related costs. The vast majority of these termination benefits were provided in accordance with our existing or local government policies and are considered ongoing benefits. These costs were accrued when they became probable and estimable and were recorded as part of other current liabilities. The majority of these costs have been paid or will be paid by the end of 2011.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements —There are no recently issued accounting pronouncements that we have not yet adopted that are expected to have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

~~ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)~~

3.
3.	Comprehensive Income

The reconciliation of net earnings to comprehensive income is as follows:

Three Months
Six Months

Ended
Ended

June 30, June 30,
2011 2010 2011 2010
(In millions) (In millions)

Net earnings of Zimmer Holdings, Inc. $ 203.8 $ 165.5 $ 412.7 $ 370.9
Other Comprehensive Income:
Foreign currency cumulative translation adjustments 38.9 (97.0 ) 169.6 (179.4 )
Unrealized cash flow hedge gains/(losses), net of tax (10.9 ) 24.3 (58.2 ) 53.0
Reclassification adjustments on foreign currency hedges, net of tax 8.8 (8.3 ) 13.2 (9.2 )
Unrealized gains on securities, net of tax 0.3 — 0.5 —
Adjustments to prior service cost and unrecognized actuarial assumptions, net of tax 0.7 0.2 1.4 1.1

Total Other Comprehensive Gain/(Loss) 37.8 (80.8 ) 126.5 (134.5 )

Comprehensive Income Attributable to Zimmer Holdings, Inc. $ 241.6 $ 84.7 $ 539.2 $ 236.4


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
	(in millions)						(in millions)
Net earnings	$	191.2		$	191.1		$	603.9		$	562.0
Other Comprehensive Income:
Foreign currency cumulative translation adjustments		(108.1	)		144.5			61.5			(34.9	)
Unrealized cash flow hedge gains/(losses), net of tax		21.6			(36.9	)		(36.6	)		16.1
Reclassification adjustments on foreign currency hedges, net of tax		8.5			(5.4	)		21.7			(14.6	)
Unrealized gains/(losses) on securities, net of tax		(0.4	)		(0.1	)		0.1			(0.1	)
Adjustments to prior service cost and unrecognized actuarial assumptions, net of tax		1.0			(0.9	)		2.4			0.2

Total Other Comprehensive Gain/(Loss)		(77.4	)		101.2			49.1			(33.3	)
Comprehensive Income		113.8			292.3			653.0			528.7
Comprehensive loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest		(0.3	)		—			(0.3	)		—

Comprehensive Income Attributable to Zimmer Holdings, Inc.	$	114.1		$	292.3		$	653.3		$	528.7

4.
4.	Inventories

June 30,
December 31,

2011 2010
(In millions)

Finished goods $ 792.4 $ 757.3
Work in progress 53.5 47.0
Raw materials 129.2 132.1

Inventories, net $ 975.1 $ 936.4


5.	~~Property, Plant and Equipment~~

June 30,
December 31,

2011 2010
(In millions)

Land $ 22.3 $ 22.0
Buildings and equipment 1,199.0 1,162.0
Capitalized software costs 179.9 172.0
Instruments 1,448.6 1,365.6
Construction in progress 65.9 66.5

2,915.7 2,788.1
Accumulated depreciation (1,702.7 ) (1,574.3 )

Property, plant and equipment, net $ 1,213.0 $ 1,213.8


	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
	(in millions)
Finished goods	$	791.0	$	757.3
Work in progress		47.2		47.0
Raw materials		130.2		132.1

Inventories	$	968.4	$	936.4

ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

5.	Property, Plant and Equipment


	September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
	(in millions)
Land	$	22.5		$	22.0
Buildings and equipment		1,197.4			1,162.0
Capitalized software costs		195.5			172.0
Instruments		1,479.2			1,365.6
Construction in progress		59.6			66.5

		2,954.2			2,788.1
Accumulated depreciation		(1,743.9	)		(1,574.3	)

Property, plant and equipment, net	$	1,210.3		$	1,213.8

6.	Investments

We invest in short and long-term investments classified asavailable-for-sale securities. Information regarding our investments is as follows (in millions):

Amortized
Gross Unrealized
Cost Gains Losses Fair value

As of June 30, 2011

Corporate debt securities $ 240.4 $ 0.3 $ (0.1 ) $ 240.6
U.S. government and agency debt securities 37.9 — — 37.9
Municipal bonds 1.0 — — 1.0
Foreign government debt securities 7.5 — — 7.5
Commercial paper 9.5 — — 9.5
Certificates of deposit 129.1 0.1 — 129.2

Total short and long-term investments $ 425.4 $ 0.4 $ (0.1 ) $ 425.7

As of December 31, 2010

Corporate debt securities $ 203.9 �� $ 0.1 $ (0.2 ) $ 203.8
U.S. government and agency debt securities 47.9 — — 47.9
Municipal bonds 1.1 — — 1.1
Foreign government debt securities 10.3 — — 10.3
Commercial paper 16.1 — — 16.1
Certificates of deposit 131.5 — (0.1 ) 131.4

Total short and long-term investments $ 410.8 $ 0.1 $ (0.3 ) $ 410.6


	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized					Fair value
	Amortized Cost		Gains		Losses			Fair value
As of September 30, 2011
Corporate debt securities	$	308.8	$	0.1	$	(0.3	)	$	308.6
U.S. government and agency debt securities		83.9		—		—			83.9
Municipal bonds		1.0		—		—			1.0
Foreign government debt securities		7.5		—		—			7.5
Commercial paper		49.5		—		—			49.5
Certificates of deposit		135.5		0.1		—			135.6

Total short and long-term investments	$	586.2	$	0.2	$	(0.3	)	$	586.1

As of December 31, 2010
Corporate debt securities	$	203.9	$	0.1	$	(0.2	)	$	203.8
U.S. government and agency debt securities		47.9		—		—			47.9
Municipal bonds		1.1		—		—			1.1
Foreign government debt securities		10.3		—		—			10.3
Commercial paper		16.1		—		—			16.1
Certificates of deposit		131.5		—		(0.1	)		131.4

Total short and long-term investments	$	410.8	$	0.1	$	(0.3	)	$	410.6

Unrealized gains and losses on these investments are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income in our consolidated balance sheet.

The following table shows the fair value and gross unrealized losses for allavailable-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position deemed to be temporary (in millions):

As of June 30, 2011 As of December 31, 2010
Unrealized
Unrealized

Fair Value Losses Fair value Losses

Corporate debt securities $ 62.4 $ (0.1 ) $ 126.1 $ (0.2 )
Certificates of deposit — — 50.6 (0.1 )

Total $ 62.4 $ (0.1 ) $ 176.7 $ (0.3 )


	As of September 30, 2011					As of December 31, 2010
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair value		Unrealized Losses
Corporate debt securities	$	169.4	$	(0.3	)	$	126.1	$	(0.2	)
Certificates of deposit		—		—			50.6		(0.1	)

Total	$	169.4	$	(0.3	)	$	176.7	$	(0.3	)

ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

All securities in the table above have been in an unrealized loss position for less than twelve months. A total of 3686 securities were in an unrealized loss position as of ~~June~~September 30, 2011.

The unrealized losses on our investments in corporate debt securities were caused by increases in interest yields resulting from adverse conditions in the global credit markets. We believe the unrealized losses associated with ouravailable-for-sale securities as of ~~June~~September 30, 2011 are temporary because we do not intend to sell these investments before maturity, and we do not believe we will be required to sell them before recovery of their amortized cost basis.

~~ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)~~

The amortized cost and fair value of ouravailable-for-sale fixed-maturity securities by contractual maturity are as follows (in millions):

As of June 30, 2011
Amortized

Cost Fair Value

Due in one year or less $ 321.2 $ 321.4
Due after one year through two years 104.2 104.3

Total $ 425.4 $ 425.7


	As of September 30, 2011
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Due in one year or less	$	424.8	$	424.9
Due after one year through two years		161.4		161.2

Total	$	586.2	$	586.1

7.
7. Debt	~~Other Current Liabilities~~

June 30,
December 31,

2011 2010
(In millions)

Other current liabilities:
Salaries, wages and benefits $ 88.9 $ 118.1
Fair value of derivatives 43.2 29.4
Accrued liabilities 391.8 376.5

Total other current liabilities $ 523.9 $ 524.0


8.	~~Debt~~

We had no short-term debt as of ~~June~~September 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010. Long-term debt as of ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 on our condensed consolidated balance sheet consisted of the following (in millions):

June 30,
December 31,

2011 2010

Senior Notes due 2019 $ 500.0 $ 500.0
Senior Notes due 2039 500.0 500.0
Debt discount (1.2 ) (1.2 )
Interest rate swaps 5.5 1.5
Senior Credit Facility 143.0 141.8

Total long-term debt $ 1,147.3 $ 1,142.1


	September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
Senior Notes due 2019	$	500.0		$	500.0
Senior Notes due 2039		500.0			500.0
Debt discount		(1.2	)		(1.2	)
Adjustment related to interest rate swaps		26.7			1.5
Senior Credit Facility		518.0			141.8

Total long-term debt	$	1,543.5		$	1,142.1

The estimated fair value of our ~~Senior Notes~~senior notes as of ~~June~~September 30, 2011, based on quoted prices for the specific securities from transactions inover-the-counter markets, was ~~$1,039.4~~$1,139.0 million. The carrying value of ~~the Senior Credit Facility~~our senior credit facility approximates fair value, as the underlying instruments have variable interest rates at market value.

ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

8.
9.	Fair Value Measurement of Assets and Liabilities

The following assets and liabilities are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis (in millions):

As of June 30, 2011
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using:
Quoted

Prices in

Active
Significant

Markets for
Other
Significant

Identical
Observable
Unobservable

Recorded
Assets
Inputs
Inputs

Description Balance (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)

Assets

Available-for-sale securities

Corporate debt securities $ 240.6 $ — $ 240.6 $ —
U.S. government and agency debt securities 37.9 — 37.9 —
Municipal bonds 1.0 — 1.0 —
Foreign government debt securities 7.5 — 7.5 —
Commercial paper 9.5 — 9.5 —
Certificates of deposit 129.2 — 129.2 —

Totalavailable-for-sale securities
425.7 — 425.7 —
Derivatives, current and long-term
Foreign currency forward contracts and options 6.8 — 6.8 —
Interest rate swaps 5.5 — 5.5 —

$ 438.0 $ — $ 438.0 $ —

Liabilities

Derivatives, current and long-term
Foreign currency forward contracts and options $ 61.9 $ — $ 61.9 $ —
Cross-currency interest rate swaps 3.3 — 3.3 —

$ 65.2 $ — $ 65.2 $ —


Description	As of September 30, 2011
	Recorded Balance		Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using:
	Recorded Balance		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets
Available-for-sale securities
Corporate debt securities	$	308.6	$	—	$	308.6	$	—
U.S. government and agency debt securities		83.9		—		83.9		—
Municipal bonds		1.0		—		1.0		—
Foreign government debt securities		7.5		—		7.5		—
Commercial paper		49.5		—		49.5		—
Certificates of deposit		135.6		—		135.6		—

Total available-for-sale securities		586.1		—		586.1		—
Derivatives, current and long-term
Foreign currency forward contracts and options		16.0		—		16.0		—
Interest rate swaps		26.7		—		26.7		—

	$	628.8	$	—	$	628.8	$	—

Liabilities
Derivatives, current and long-term
Foreign currency forward contracts and options	$	34.5	$	—	$	34.5	$	—
Cross-currency interest rate swaps		11.2		—		11.2		—

	$	45.7	$	—	$	45.7	$	—

ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

As of December 31, 2010
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using:
Quoted

Prices in

Active
Significant

Markets for
Other
Significant

Identical
Observable
Unobservable

Recorded
Assets
Inputs
Inputs

Description Balance (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)

Assets

Available-for-sale securities

Corporate debt securities $ 203.8 $ — $ 203.8 $ —
U.S. government and agency debt securities 47.9 — 47.9 —
Municipal bonds 1.1 — 1.1 —
Foreign government debt securities 10.3 — 10.3 —
Commercial paper 16.1 — 16.1 —
Certificates of deposit 131.4 — 131.4 —

Totalavailable-for-sale securities
410.6 — 410.6 —
Derivatives, current and long-term
Foreign currency forward contracts and options 34.5 — 34.5 —
Interest rate swaps 1.5 — 1.5 —

$ 446.6 $ — $ 446.6 $ —

Liabilities

Derivatives, current and long-term
Foreign currency forward contracts and options $ 40.0 $ — $ 40.0 $ —

$ 40.0 $ — $ 40.0 $ —


Description	As of December 31, 2010
	Recorded Balance		Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using:
	Recorded Balance		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets
Available-for-sale securities
Corporate debt securities	$	203.8	$	—	$	203.8	$	—
U.S. government and agency debt securities		47.9		—		47.9		—
Municipal bonds		1.1		—		1.1		—
Foreign government debt securities		10.3		—		10.3		—
Commercial paper		16.1		—		16.1		—
Certificates of deposit		131.4		—		131.4		—

Total available-for-sale securities		410.6		—		410.6		—
Derivatives, current and long-term
Foreign currency forward contracts and options		34.5		—		34.5		—
Interest rate swaps		1.5		—		1.5		—

	$	446.6	$	—	$	446.6	$	—

Liabilities
Derivatives, current and long-term
Foreign currency forward contracts and options	$	40.0	$	—	$	40.0	$	—

	$	40.0	$	—	$	40.0	$	—

We value ouravailable-for-sale securities using a market approach based on broker prices for identical assets inover-the-counter ~~markets.~~

markets and assess counterparty credit risk.

We value our foreign currency forward contracts and foreign currency options using a market approach based on foreign currency exchange rates obtained from active markets and perform ongoing assessments of counterparty credit risk.

We value our interest rate swaps using a market approach based on publicly available market yield curves and the terms of our ~~swaps.~~

swaps and assess counterparty credit risk.

We value our cross-currency interest rate swaps using a market approach based upon publicly available market yield curves, foreign currency exchange rates obtained from active markets and the terms of our swaps. We also perform ongoing assessments of counterparty credit risk.

9.
~~10.~~	Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

We are exposed to certain market risks relating to our ongoing business operations, including foreign currency exchange rate risk, commodity price risk, interest rate risk and credit risk. We manage our exposure to these and other market risks through regular operating and financing activities. Currently, the only risks that we manage through the use of derivative instruments are interest rate risk and foreign currency exchange rate risk.

ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Interest Rate Risk

Derivatives Designated as Fair Value Hedges

We use interest rate derivative instruments to manage our exposure to interest rate movements by converting fixed-rate debt into variable-rate debt. Under these agreements, we agree to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between fixed and variable interest amounts calculated by reference to anagreed-upon notional principal amount. The objective of the instruments is to more closely align interest expense with interest income received on cash and cash equivalents. These derivative instruments are designated as fair value hedges under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument are recorded in current earnings and are offset by gains or losses on the underlying debt instrument.

In 2010, we entered into multiple nine-yearfixed-to-variable interest rate swap agreements with a total notional amount of $250 million. These interest rate swap agreements were designated as fair value hedges of the fixed interest rate obligation under our $500 million 4.625 percent Senior Notes due November 30, 2019. We receive a fixed interest rate of 4.625 percent and pay variable interest equal to the three-month LIBOR plus an average of 133 basis points on these interest rate swap agreements.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

We operate on a global basis and are exposed to the risk that our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates. To reduce the potential effects of foreign currency exchange rate movements on net earnings, we enter into derivative financial instruments in the form of foreign currency exchange forward contracts and options with major financial institutions. We are primarily exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk with respect to transactions and net assets denominated in Euros, Swiss Francs, Japanese Yen, British Pounds, Canadian Dollars, Australian Dollars, Korean Won, Swedish Krona, Czech Koruna, Thai Baht, Taiwan Dollars, South African Rand, Russian Rubles and Indian Rupees. We do not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

Derivatives Designated as Cash Flow Hedges

Our revenues are generated in various currencies throughout the world. However, a significant amount of our inventory is produced in U.S. Dollars. Therefore, movements in foreign currency exchange rates may have different proportional effects on our revenues compared to our cost of products sold. To minimize the effects of foreign currency exchange rate movements on cash flows, we hedge intercompany sales of inventory expected to occur within the next 30 months with foreign currency exchange forward contracts and options. We designate these derivative instruments as cash flow hedges.

We perform quarterly assessments of hedge effectiveness by verifying and documenting the critical terms of the hedge instrument and that forecasted transactions have not changed significantly. We also assess on a quarterly basis whether there have been adverse developments regarding the risk of a counterparty default. For derivatives which qualify as hedges of future cash flows, the effective portion of changes in fair value is temporarily recorded in other comprehensive income and then recognized in cost of products sold when the hedged item affects net earnings. The ineffective portion of a derivative’s change in fair value, if any, is immediately reported in cost of products sold.

For forward contracts and options outstanding at ~~June~~September 30, 2011, we have obligations to purchase U.S. Dollars and sell Euros, Japanese Yen, British Pounds, Canadian Dollars, Australian Dollars, Korean Won, Swedish Krona, Czech Koruna, Thai Baht, Taiwan Dollars, South African Rand, Russian Rubles and Indian Rupees and purchase Swiss Francs and sell U.S. Dollars at set maturity dates ranging from ~~July~~October 2011 through ~~December 2013.~~March 2014. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2011, the notional amounts of outstanding forward contracts and options

ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

entered into with third parties to purchase U.S. Dollars were ~~$1.4~~$1.2 billion. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2011, the notional amounts of outstanding forward contracts and options entered into with third parties to purchase Swiss Francs were ~~$183.8~~$220.8 million.

~~ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)~~

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments

We enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts with terms of one month to manage currency exposures for monetary assets and liabilities denominated in a currency other than an entity’s functional currency. As a result, any foreign currency remeasurement gains/losses recognized in earnings are generally offset with gains/losses on the foreign currency forward exchange contracts in the same reporting period. These offsetting gains/losses are recorded in cost of products sold as the underlying assets and liabilities exposed to remeasurement include inventory-related transactions. These contracts are settled on the last day of each reporting period. Therefore, there is no outstanding balance related to these contracts recorded on the balance sheet as of the end of the reporting period. The notional amounts of these contracts are typically in a range of $1.2 billion to $1.7 billion per quarter.

Foreign Currency Exchange and Interest Rate Risk

Derivatives Designated as Cash Flow Hedges

In 2011, our subsidiary in Japan, ~~subsidiary,~~ with a functional currency of Japanese Yen, borrowed variable-rate debt of $143.0 million denominated in U.S. Dollars under our Senior Credit Facility. To manage the foreign currency exchange risk associated with remeasuring the debt to Japanese Yen and the interest rate risk associated with the variable-rate debt, we have entered into multiple cross-currency interest rate swap agreements with a total notional amount of 11,798 million Japanese Yen. We designated these swaps as cash flow hedges of the foreign currency exchange and interest rate risks. The effective portion of changes in fair value of the cross-currency interest rate swaps is temporarily recorded in other comprehensive income and then recognized in interest expense, net when the hedged item affects net earnings. We pay a fixed interest rate of 0.1 percent and receive variable interest equal to the three-month LIBOR plus 18.5 basis points on these cross-currency interest rate swap agreements.

Income Statement Presentation

Derivatives Designated as Fair Value Hedges

Derivative instruments designated as fair value hedges had the following effects on our condensed consolidated statement of earnings (in millions):

Gain on Instrument Loss on Hedged Item
Three Months
Six Months
Three Months
Six Months
Ended
Ended
Ended
Ended
Location on
June 30, June 30, June 30, June 30,
Derivative Instrument Statement of Earnings 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010

Interest rate swaps Interest expense, net $ 7.1 $ — $ 4.0 $ — $ (7.1 ) $ — $ (4.0 ) $ —


Derivative Instrument	Location on Statement of Earnings	Gain on Instrument								Loss on Hedged Item
		Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,				Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
		2011		2010		2011		2010		2011			2010		2011			2010
Interest rate swaps	Interest expense, net	$	21.2	$	—	$	25.2	$	—	$	(21.2	)	$	—	$	(25.2	)	$	—

We had no ineffective fair value hedging instruments during the three and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and 2010.

ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Derivatives Designated as Cash Flow Hedges

Derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges had the following effects on other comprehensive income (OCI) on our condensed consolidated balance sheet and our condensed consolidated statement of earnings (in millions):

Amount of
Amount of

Gain/(Loss)
Gain/(Loss)

Recognized in OCI Reclassified from OCI
Three Months
Six Months
Three Months
Six Months

Ended
Ended
Ended
Ended

June 30, June 30, Location on
June 30, June 30,
Derivative Instrument 2011 2010 2011 2010 Statement of Earnings 2011 2010 2011 2010

Foreign exchange forward contracts $ (16.0 ) $ 28.3 $ (74.1 ) $ 58.9 Cost of products sold $ (12.2 ) $ 8.0 $ (17.4 ) $ 7.6
Foreign exchange options 2.8 — 3.7 — Cost of products sold — — — —
Cross-currency interest rate swaps (0.8 ) — 0.2 — Interest expense, net (0.5 ) — (3.5 ) —

$ (14.0 ) $ 28.3 $ (70.2 ) $ 58.9 $ (12.7 ) $ 8.0 $ (20.9 ) $ 7.6


Derivative Instrument	Amount of Gain / (Loss) Recognized in OCI											Location on Statement of Earnings	Amount of Gain / (Loss) Reclassified from OCI
	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010			2011			2010		2011			2010
Foreign exchange forward contracts	$	31.8		$	(49.3	)	$	(42.3	)	$	9.6	Cost of products sold	$	(7.0	)	$	5.0	$	(24.4	)	$	12.6
Foreign exchange options		(2.2	)		—			1.5			—	Cost of products sold		—			—		—			—
Cross-currency interest rate swaps		—			—			0.2			—	Interest expense, net		(7.9	)		—		(11.4	)		—

	$	29.6		$	(49.3	)	$	(40.6	)	$	9.6		$	(14.9	)	$	5.0	$	(35.8	)	$	12.6

The net amount recognized in earnings during the three and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and 2010 due to ineffectiveness and amounts excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness was not significant.

The fair value of outstanding derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges and recorded on the balance sheet at ~~June~~September 30, 2011, together with settled derivatives where the hedged item has not yet affected earnings, was a net unrealized loss of ~~$73.4~~$37.2 million, or ~~$45.0~~$19.0 million after taxes, which is deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income. Of the net unrealized loss, ~~$43.0~~$25.1 million, or ~~$28.3~~$12.5 million after taxes, is expected to be reclassified to earnings over the next twelve months.

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments

The following gains/(losses) from these derivative instruments were recognized on our condensed consolidated statement of earnings (in millions):

Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
Location on
June 30, June 30,
Derivative Instrument Statement of Earnings 2011 2010 2011 2010

Foreign exchange forward contracts Cost of products sold $ 1.3 $ 11.1 $ (13.7 ) $ 18.3


Derivative Instrument	Location on Statement of Earnings	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
Derivative Instrument	Location on Statement of Earnings	2011		2010			2011			2010
Foreign exchange forward contracts	Cost of products sold	$	9.7	$	(14.7	)	$	(4.0	)	$	3.6

This impact does not include any offsetting gains/losses recognized in earnings as a result of foreign currency remeasurement of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in a currency other than an entity’s functional currency.

ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Balance Sheet Presentation

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, all derivative instruments designated as fair value hedges and cash flow hedges are recorded at fair value on the balance sheet. On our consolidated balance sheet, we recognize individual forward contracts and options with the same counterparty on a net asset/liability basis if we have a master

~~ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)~~

netting agreement with the counterparty. The fair value of derivative instruments on a gross basis is as follows (in millions):

June 30, 2011 December 31, 2010
Balance
Balance

Sheet
Fair
Sheet
Fair
Location Value Location Value

Asset Derivatives

Foreign exchange forward contracts Other current assets $ 27.1 Other current assets $32.2
Foreign exchange options Other current assets 1.8 Other current assets 0.4
Foreign exchange forward contracts Other assets 5.8 Other assets 11.6
Foreign exchange options Other assets 4.6 Other assets 2.3
Interest rate swaps Other assets 5.5 Other assets 1.5

Total asset derivatives
$ 44.8 $48.0

Liability Derivatives

Foreign exchange forward contracts Other current liabilities $ 66.3 Other current liabilities $37.6
Cross-currency interest rate swaps Other current liabilities 3.3 Other current liabilities —
Foreign exchange forward contracts Other long-term liabilities 28.1 Other long-term liabilities 14.4

Total liability derivatives
$ 97.7 $52.0


	September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
	Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value
*Asset Derivatives*
Foreign exchange forward contracts	Other current assets	$	26.1	Other current assets	$	32.2
Foreign exchange options	Other current assets		2.3	Other current assets		0.4
Foreign exchange forward contracts	Other assets		12.5	Other assets		11.6
Foreign exchange options	Other assets		1.8	Other assets		2.3
Interest rate swaps	Other assets		26.7	Other assets		1.5

Total asset derivatives		$	69.4		$	48.0

*Liability Derivatives*
Foreign exchange forward contracts	Other current liabilities	$	43.6	Other current liabilities	$	37.6
Cross-currency interest rate swaps	Other current liabilities		11.2	Other current liabilities		—
Foreign exchange forward contracts	Other long-term liabilities		17.6	Other long-term liabilities		14.4

Total liability derivatives		$	72.4		$	52.0

10.
~~11.~~	Income Taxes

We operate on a global basis and are subject to numerous and complex tax laws and regulations. Our income tax filings are regularly under audit in multiple federal, state and foreign jurisdictions. Income tax audits may require an extended period of time to reach resolution and may result in significant income tax adjustments when interpretation of tax laws or allocation of company profits is disputed. During the first and second quarters of 2011, we resolved tax matters in multiple jurisdictions resulting in a reduction in both the net amount of tax liability for unrecognized tax benefits and income tax expense. The net amount of tax liability for unrecognized tax benefits may change within the next twelve months due to changes in audit status, expiration of statutes of limitations and other events which could impact our determination of unrecognized tax benefits. Currently, we cannot reasonably estimate the amount by which our unrecognized tax benefits will change.

In the three and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, our effective tax ~~rate was 18.2~~rates were 25.0 percent and ~~22.9~~23.6 percent, respectively. Our effective tax rates were lower than the U.S. statutory income tax rate of 35 percent primarily due to income earned in foreign locations with lower tax rates, the resolution of certain tax matters discussed above, and the accrual of $50.0 million “Certain claims” expense in the second quarter of 2011, which lowered the U.S. tax jurisdiction income relative to the income of our foreign operations.

In May 2011, the IRS concluded their examination of our U.S. federal returns for years 2005 through 2007 and issued income tax assessments reallocating profits between certain of our U.S. and foreign subsidiaries. We believe that we have followed applicable U.S. tax laws and are vigorously defending our income tax positions. The ultimate resolution of this matter is uncertain and could have a material impact on our income tax expense, results of operations, and cash flows for future periods.

ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

11.
~~12.~~	Retirement Benefit Plans

We have defined benefit pension plans covering certain U.S. and Puerto Rico employees. The employees who are not participating in the defined benefit plans receive additional benefits under our defined contribution plans. Plan benefits are primarily based on years of credited service and the participant’s compensation. In addition to the

~~ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)~~

U.S. and Puerto Rico defined benefit pension plans, we sponsor variousnon-U.S. pension arrangements, including retirement and termination benefit plans required by local law or coordinated with government sponsored plans.

The components of net pension expense for our U.S. andnon-U.S. defined benefit retirement plans are as follows (in millions):

Three Months
Six Months

Ended
Ended

June 30, June 30,
2011 2010 2011 2010

Service cost $ 7.2 $ 6.2 $ 14.1 $ 12.5
Interest cost 5.2 4.4 10.2 9.0
Expected return on plan assets (8.0 ) (6.4 ) (15.8 ) (12.9 )
Amortization of prior service cost (0.2 ) (0.3 ) (0.4 ) (0.4 )
Amortization of unrecognized actuarial loss 1.8 0.8 3.7 1.7

Net periodic benefit cost $ 6.0 $ 4.7 $ 11.8 $ 9.9


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Service cost	$	7.4		$	6.4		$	21.5		$	18.9
Interest cost		5.2			4.5			15.4			13.5
Expected return on plan assets		(8.1	)		(6.5	)		(23.9	)		(19.4	)
Amortization of prior service cost		(0.3	)		(0.2	)		(0.7	)		(0.6	)
Amortization of unrecognized actuarial loss		1.9			0.8			5.6			2.5

Net periodic benefit cost	$	6.1		$	5.0		$	17.9		$	14.9

We contributed $36.5 million during the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 to our U.S. and Puerto Rico defined benefit plans and do not expect to contribute additional funds to these plans during the remainder of 2011. We contributed ~~$7.9~~$12.1 million to our foreign-based defined benefit plans in the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and expect to contribute ~~approximately $8~~$4.1 million to these foreign-based plans during the remainder of 2011.

12.
~~13.~~	Earnings Per Share

The following is a reconciliation of weighted average shares for the basic and diluted shares computations (in millions):

Three Months
Six Months

Ended
Ended

June 30, June 30,
2011 2010 2011 2010

Weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share 191.5 201.9 192.1 202.4
Effect of dilutive stock options and other equity awards 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.2

Weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share 192.7 203.0 193.3 203.6


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
Weighted average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per share		187.7		198.7		190.6		201.2
Effect of dilutive stock options and other equity awards		1.1		1.0		1.2		1.1

Weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net earnings per share		188.8		199.7		191.8		202.3

During the three and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, an average of ~~11.6~~13.8 million options and ~~12.2~~12.7 million options, respectively, to purchase shares of common stock were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise prices of these options were greater than the average market price of the common stock. During the three and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, an average of ~~13.3~~14.4 million options and ~~13.1~~13.5 million options, respectively, were not included in the computation.

In the three month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, we repurchased ~~1.8~~10.1 million shares of our common stock at an average price of ~~$66.21~~$54.30 per share for a total cash outlay of ~~$121.1~~$549.3 million, including commissions. In the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, we repurchased ~~6.1~~16.2 million shares of our common stock at an

ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

average price of ~~$58.97~~$56.05 per share for a total cash outlay of ~~$357.2~~$906.5 million, including commissions. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2011, approximately ~~$0.8~~$0.3 billion remained authorized under a $1.5 billion repurchase program, which will expire on December 31, 2013.

~~ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)~~

13.
~~14.~~	Segment Information

We design, develop, manufacture and market orthopaedic reconstructive implants, dental implants, spinal implants, trauma products and related surgical products which include surgical supplies and instruments designed to aid in surgical procedures and post-operation rehabilitation. We also provide other healthcare-related services which generate revenues that are less than 1 percent of our total net sales. We manage operations through three major geographic segments — the Americas, which is comprised principally of the U.S. and includes other North, Central and South American markets; Europe, which is comprised principally of Europe and includes the Middle East and African markets; and Asia Pacific, which is comprised primarily of Japan and includes other Asian and Pacific markets. This structure is the basis for our reportable segment information discussed below. Management evaluates reportable segment performance based upon segment operating profit exclusive of operating expenses pertaining to share-based payment expense, inventorystep-up, “Certain claims,” goodwill impairment, “Special items” and global operations and corporate functions. Global operations and corporate functions include research, development engineering, medical education, brand management, corporate legal, finance, and human resource functions, U.S. and Puerto Rico-based manufacturing operations and logistics and intangible amortization resulting from business combination accounting. Intercompany transactions have been eliminated from segment operating profit.

Net sales and segment operating profit are as follows (in millions):

Net Sales Operating Profit
Three Months
Three Months

Ended
Ended

June 30, June 30,
2011 2010 2011 2010

Americas $ 608.6 $ 609.3 $ 302.0 $ 307.5
Europe 324.7 276.5 105.4 101.8
Asia Pacific 204.1 171.9 73.1 65.7

Total $ 1,137.4 $ 1,057.7

Share-based compensation (17.4 ) (17.9 )
Inventorystep-up
(3.4 ) —
Certain Claims (50.0 ) (75.0 )
Special items (13.5 ) (11.5 )
Global operations and corporate functions (137.1 ) (142.5 )

Operating profit $ 259.1 $ 228.1


	Net Sales				Operating Profit
	Three Months Ended September 30,				Three Months Ended September 30,
	2011		2010		2011			2010
Americas	$	582.1	$	583.2	$	293.2		$	290.0
Europe		252.5		215.8		75.6			68.8
Asia Pacific		196.9		166.0		69.2			64.3

Total	$	1,031.5	$	965.0

Share-based compensation						(14.4	)		(14.8	)
Inventory step-up						(1.8	)		—
Certain claims						—			—
Special items						(8.0	)		(5.0	)
Global operations and corporate functions						(147.2	)		(131.7	)

Operating profit					$	266.6		$	271.6

ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Net Sales Operating Profit
Six Months
Six Months

Ended
Ended

June 30, June 30,
2011 2010 2011 2010

Americas $ 1,238.3 $ 1,225.0 $ 613.4 $ 614.3
Europe 623.9 562.6 216.2 206.6
Asia Pacific 390.8 332.9 147.0 126.8

Total $ 2,253.0 $ 2,120.5

Share-based compensation (31.7 ) (30.6 )
Inventorystep-up
(7.8 ) (1.3 )
Certain Claims (50.0 ) (75.0 )
Special items (39.0 ) (14.1 )
Global operations and corporate functions (291.8 ) (304.5 )

Operating profit $ 556.3 $ 522.2


	Net Sales				Operating Profit
	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011		2010		2011			2010
Americas	$	1,820.4	$	1,808.2	$	906.6		$	904.4
Europe		876.4		778.4		291.8			275.4
Asia Pacific		587.7		498.9		216.2			191.1

Total	$	3,284.5	$	3,085.5

Share-based compensation						(46.1	)		(45.4	)
Inventory step-up						(9.6	)		(1.3	)
Certain claims						(50.0	)		(75.0	)
Special items						(47.0	)		(19.1	)
Global operations and corporate functions						(439.0	)		(436.3	)

Operating profit					$	822.9		$	793.8

Net sales by product category are as follows (in millions):

Three Months
Six Months

Ended
Ended

June 30, June 30,
2011 2010 2011 2010

Reconstructive
Knees $ 470.9 $ 452.9 $ 933.1 $ 913.3
Hips 345.0 317.1 682.3 632.8
Extremities 40.7 38.2 83.6 76.6

Total 856.6 808.2 1,699.0 1,622.7

Dental 67.1 55.9 129.5 107.6
Trauma 69.1 57.8 139.2 118.2
Spine 56.4 57.9 113.3 117.9
Surgical and other 88.2 77.9 172.0 154.1

Total $ 1,137.4 $ 1,057.7 $ 2,253.0 $ 2,120.5


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
Reconstructive
Knees	$	416.7	$	402.9	$	1,349.8	$	1,316.2
Hips		315.6		287.3		997.9		920.1
Extremities		36.0		33.6		119.6		110.2

Total		768.3		723.8		2,467.3		2,346.5

Dental		55.1		49.0		184.6		156.6
Trauma		69.3		58.1		208.5		176.3
Spine		55.2		56.5		168.5		174.4
Surgical and other		83.6		77.6		255.6		231.7

Total	$	1,031.5	$	965.0	$	3,284.5	$	3,085.5

14.
~~15.~~	Commitments and Contingencies

Product Liability and Related Claims

We are subject to product liability claims arising in the ordinary course of our business. We establish standard accruals for product liability claims in conjunction with outside counsel based on current information and historical settlement information for open claims, related legal fees and claims incurred but not reported. These standard product liability accruals are recognized in selling, general and administrative expense. We may also establish provisions for certain product liability claims outside of the standard accruals that are recorded separately on our statement of earnings, such as the provision for claims related to theDurom^® Acetabular Component (DuromCup) discussed below. We maintain insurance, subject to self-insured retention requirements, for losses from these and other claims.

~~ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)~~

On July 22, 2008, we temporarily suspended marketing and distribution of theDuromCup in the U.S. Subsequently, a number of product liability lawsuits and other claims have been asserted against us. We have settled some of these claims and the others are still pending. Additional claims may be asserted in the future.

ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

We have recorded provisions totaling $229.0 million as “Certain claims” on our statement of earnings, including $50.0 million and $75.0 million in the three month periods ending June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, representing our estimate of theDuromCup-related claims we expect to be made for revision surgeries. Initially, the “Certain claims” provision was limited to original surgeries performed before July 22, 2008, with a revision surgery occurring within two years of the original surgery. However, based upon subsequent claims received we revised our estimate to include all claims for original surgeries performed before July 22, 2008 on a worldwide basis, regardless of the amount of time between the revision surgery and the original surgery. We have received claims in excess of our ~~previous~~initial estimates, which necessitated subsequent adjustments including the additional $50.0 million provision in the three month period ended June 30, 2011.

From 2008 through March 31, 2010, we recorded $42.7 million as part of our standard product liability accruals for worldwide claims relating to revisions ofDuromCup cases where the revisions had occurred, or were estimated to occur, more than two years after the original surgery. Of this amount, $10.9 million was recorded in the three month period ended March 31, 2010. Beginning with the second quarter of 2010, any additional provisions for such claims are recorded as part of the “Certain claims” accrual, as described above.

Therefore, the total amount of provisions recorded for original surgeries which occurred before July 22, 2008, is $271.7 million. We will continue to record any provisions for claims relating toDuromCup cases where the original surgery was performed after July 22, 2008 as part of our standard product liability accruals. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2011, we have recorded cumulative provisions totaling ~~$9.0~~$10.2 million for such post-suspension claims.

Our estimate as of ~~June~~September 30, 2011 of the remaining liability for allDuromCup-related claims relating to original surgeries performed before July 22, 2008 is ~~$159.8~~$142.6 million, of which $42.5 million is classified as short-term in “Other current liabilities” and ~~$117.3~~$100.1 million is classified as long-term in “Other long-term liabilities” on our consolidated balance sheet. We expect to pay the majority of theDuromCup-related claims within the next three years.

We rely on significant estimates in determining the provisions forDuromCup-related claims, including the number of claims that we will receive and the average amount we will pay per claim. The actual number of claims that we receive and the amount we pay per claim may differ from our estimates. We cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of loss that may result fromDuromCup-related claims in excess of the losses we have accrued.

On August 20, 2008, Margo and Daniel Polett filed an action against us and an unrelated third party, Public Communications, Inc. (PCI), in the Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania seeking an unspecified amount of damages for injuries and loss of consortium allegedly suffered by Mrs. Polett and her spouse, respectively. The complaint alleged that defendants were negligent in connection with Mrs. Polett’s participation in a promotional video featuring one of our knee products. The case was tried in November 2010 and the jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiffs. The jury awarded $27.6 million in compensatory damages and apportioned fault 30 percent to plaintiffs, 34 percent to us and 36 percent to PCI. Under applicable law, we may be liable for any portion of the damages apportioned to PCI that it does not pay. On December 2, 2010, we and PCI filed a Motion for Post-Trial Relief seeking a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, a new trial or a remittitur. On June 10, 2011, the trial court entered an order denying our Motion for Post-Trial Relief and affirming the jury verdict in full and entered judgment for $20.3 million against us and PCI. On June 29, 2011, we filed a Notice of Appeal to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania and posted a bond for the verdict amount plus interest. We do not believe the facts and evidence support the jury’s verdict. We have not recorded any charge relating to this matter in our condensed consolidated statement of earnings for the quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 or for any prior period, because we believe we have strong arguments for reversing the jury verdict on appeal. As a result, we do not believe that it is probable that we have incurred a liability consistent with the verdict and we cannot reasonably estimate any loss that might eventually be incurred. Although we believe we have strong grounds to reverse the jury’s verdict, the ultimate resolution of this matter is uncertain. We could in the future be required to record a charge to our consolidated statement of earnings that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in any particular period.

ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Intellectual Property and Related Claims

We are subject to claims of patent infringement and other intellectual property-related claims and lawsuits in the ordinary course of our business.

~~On February 15,~~

As previously reported, in 2005 Howmedica Osteonics Corp. (Howmedica) filed an action against us ~~and an unrelated party~~ in ~~the~~ U.S. District Court ~~for the District of New Jersey~~ alleging infringement of four U.S. ~~Patent Nos. 6,174,934; 6,372,814; 6,664,308; and 6,818,020. On June 13,~~patents. In 2007, the District Court granted our motion for summary judgment on the invalidity of the asserted claims of ~~U.S. Patent Nos. 6,174,934; 6,372,814; and 6,664,308 by ruling that all~~three of the asserted claims are invalid for indefiniteness. On August 19, 2008, the Court granted our motion for summary judgment of non-infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,818,020, reducing the number of claims at issue in the suit to five. On April 9, 2009, in response to our earlier petition, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) instituted re-examination proceedings against U.S. Patent No. 6,818,020. The USPTO rejected all previously issued claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,818,020 as being unpatentable in light of one or more prior art references. On September 30, 2009, the Court issued an order staying proceedings in the litigation pending the outcome of the~~re-examination~~ ~~process. Subsequent to that stay order, Howmedica filed a motion seeking to certify an appeal of the summary judgment ruling on the ’934, ’814 and ’308~~four patents. ~~That motion was granted on January 13, 2010. On October 13,~~In 2010, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the District Court’s ruling on the invalidity of the asserted claims of the ’934, ’814 and ’308 patents. On November 12, 2010, Howmedica filed a petition for a re-hearing en banc, which was denied on December 14, 2010. On March 14, 2011,ruling. Howmedica filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court seeking review of the Federal Circuit decision, which was denied onin May ~~16,~~ 2011. ~~The case otherwise remains stayed~~Also as previously reported, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) instituted re-examination proceedings against the fourth patent, and the District Court issued an order staying proceedings in the litigation pending the ~~USPTO’s re-examination~~outcome of the ~~‘020 patent.~~re-examination process. At this time, all claims of that patent have been rejected as unpatentable by the USPTO. We ~~continue to believe that our defenses against infringement of the ‘020 patent are valid and meritorious, and we~~do not intend to ~~continue to defend~~provide further updates on this ~~lawsuit vigorously.~~

matter until the re-examination process is concluded and/or the stay order is lifted.

We are involved in certain ongoing contractual and other disputes pertaining to royalty arrangements with licensors of technology. We intend to defend ourselves vigorously against the licensors’ claims. Because these matters are in ~~the preliminary stages of the~~an ongoing dispute resolution process, we cannot estimate the possible loss, if any, we may incur or predict the likely outcome of these matters.

An adverse result in the legal proceedings could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

Government Investigations

In September 2007, we and other orthopaedic companies settled a U.S. government investigation pertaining to consulting contracts, professional services agreements and other agreements by which remuneration is provided to orthopaedic surgeons. As part of the settlement, we entered into a Corporate Integrity Agreement (CIA) with the Office of Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services (OIG-HHS). Under the CIA, which has a term expiring in 2012, we agreed, among other provisions, to continue the operation of our enhanced Corporate Compliance Program, designed to promote compliance with federal healthcare program requirements. We also agreed to retain an independent review organization to perform annual reviews to assist us in assessing our compliance with the obligations set forth in the CIA to ensure that arrangements we enter into do not violate the Anti-Kickback Statute (42 U.S.C.§ 1320a-7b). A material breach of the CIA may subject us to exclusion byOIG-HHS from participation in all federal healthcare programs, which would have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

In September 2007, the Staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) informed us that it was conducting an investigation regarding potential violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) in the sale of medical devices in a number of foreign countries by companies in the medical device industry. In November 2007, we received a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) requesting that any information provided to the SEC also be provided to the DOJ on a voluntary basis. In the course of continuing dialogues with the agencies, we have voluntarily disclosed information to the SEC and DOJ relating to sales of our products by independent distributors in two South American countries. In the first quarter of 2011, we received a subpoena from the SEC seeking documents and other records pertaining to our business activities in substantially all countries in the Asia Pacific

~~ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)~~

region where we operate. We are in the process of responding to the subpoena. We cannot currently predict the outcome of this investigation.

If the result of the investigation is that we are found to be in violation of the FCPA, we could face significant monetary penalties or be required to take other remedial actions.

Putative Class Actions

On August 5, 2008, a complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union 719 Pension Fund v. Zimmer Holdings, Inc., et al., naming us and two of our executive officers as defendants. The complaint related to a putative class action on behalf of persons who

ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

purchased our common stock between January 29, 2008 and July 22, 2008. The complaint alleged that the defendants violated the federal securities law by allegedly failing to disclose developments relating to our orthopaedic surgical products manufacturing operations in Dover, Ohio and theDuromCup. The plaintiff sought unspecified damages and interest, attorneys’ fees, costs and other relief. On December 24, 2008, the lead plaintiff filed a consolidated complaint that alleged the same claims and related to the same time period. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated complaint on February 23, 2009. On December 1, 2009, the ~~Court~~trial court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss, without prejudice. On January 15, 2010, the plaintiff filed a motion for leave to amend the consolidated complaint. On January 28, 2011, the ~~Court~~trial court denied the plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend the consolidated complaint and dismissed the case. On February 25, 2011, the plaintiff filed a notice of appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. The appellate court heard oral argument in the appeal on October 18, 2011 but has not yet ruled. We believe this lawsuit is without merit, and we and the individual defendants intend to defend it vigorously.

On November 20, 2008, a complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, Dewald v. Zimmer Holdings, Inc., et al., naming us and certain of our current and former directors and employees as defendants. The complaint relates to a putative class action on behalf of all persons who were participants in or beneficiaries of our U.S. or Puerto Rico Savings and Investment Programs (plans) between October 5, 2007 and the date of filing and whose accounts included investments in our common stock. The complaint alleges, among other things, that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties in violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, by continuing to offer Zimmer stock as an investment option in the plans when the stock purportedly was no longer a prudent investment and that defendants failed to provide plan participants with complete and accurate information sufficient to advise them of the risks of investing their retirement savings in Zimmer stock. The plaintiff seeks an unspecified monetary payment to the plans, injunctive and equitable relief, attorneys’ fees, costs and other relief. On January 23, 2009, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint that alleges the same claims and clarifies that the class period is October 5, 2007 through September 2, 2008. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint on March 23, 2009. The motion to dismiss is pending with the court. On June 12, 2009, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation entered an order transferring the Dewald case to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the Plumbers & Pipefitters Local Union 719 Pension Fund case referenced above. We believe this lawsuit is without merit, and we and the individual defendants intend to defend it vigorously.

Regulatory Matters

In July 2011, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) conducted an inspection of our Warsaw, Indiana manufacturing facility, following which it issued a Form FDA-483 (Form 483 notice). The Form 483 notice identified certain inspectional observations regarding the facility’s quality systems. The facility manufactures reconstructive products that are sold globally. We have responded in writing to the observations and met with representatives of the district office of the FDA to discuss our response and action plans. We expect the FDA to conduct a re-inspection of this facility in the future to determine whether we have taken sufficient actions to address the observations described in the Form 483 notice. At this time, we do not know whether the FDA will take additional actions with respect to the matters included in the Form 483 notice and so we are unable to estimate the impact, if any, this development may have on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.


Item 2.	*Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations*

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and corresponding notes included elsewhere in thisForm 10-Q. Certain percentages presented in this discussion and analysis are calculated from the underlying whole-dollar amounts and therefore may not recalculate from the rounded numbers used for disclosure purposes. In addition, certain amounts in the 2010 condensed consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2011 presentation.

Overview

We believe the following developments or trends are important in understanding our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the three and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and our expected results for the remainder of 2011.

Demand (Volume and Mix) Trends

Increased volume and changes in the mix of product sales contributed 3 percentage points ofyear-over-year sales growth during the three month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, which is 12 percentage ~~point less~~points more than the three month period ended September 30, 2010, and the same as the three month period ended June 30, ~~2010, as well as the three month period ended March 31,~~ 2011.

Volume and mix trends continued to be challenged by the global ~~economy, especially~~economy. We believe reconstructive procedure volumes in the third quarter continued to be lower than historical utilization rates and lower than demographic trends would indicate. This effect was particularly pronounced in our Americas operating ~~segment. We believe continued~~segment, where the impact of ongoing high unemployment ~~levels are linked~~and low consumer confidence, contributed to ~~lower enrollment in private health insurance plans, which has affected the patient pool for joint replacement procedures.~~

softness.

Long-term indicators still point toward sustained growth driven by an aging global population, obesity, more active lifestyles, growth in emerging markets, new material technologies, advances in surgical techniques and proven clinical benefits of joint replacement procedures. In addition, the ongoing shift in demand to premium products, such asProlong^® Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene,Trabecular Metal^TM Technology products, hip stems withKinectiv^®Technology, high-flex knees, porous hip stems and the introduction of patient specific devices, is expected to continue to positively affect sales growth.

Pricing Trends

Global selling prices had a negative effect of 1 percent onyear-over-year sales growth during the three month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, which is consistent with the three month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, as well as the three month period ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011. Selling prices in the Americas had a negative effect of 2 percent on sales growth in that operating segment during the three month period ended September 30, 2011. Europe selling prices had a positive effect of 1 percent on sales growth in that operating segment during the three month period ended ~~June 30, 2011. Europe selling prices had minimal effects on sales growth in that operating segment during the three month period ended June~~September 30, 2011. In our Asia Pacific operating segment, ~~the pricing trends improved from~~selling prices had a negative ~~3 percent~~ effect on~~year-over-year~~ ~~sales growth in the three month period ended March 31, 2011, to a negative~~of 1 percent effect in the three month period ended June 30, 2011. This is mainly attributable to the anniversary of bi-annual pricing adjustments in Japan that went into effect on April 1, 2010. Accordingly, we expect pricing trends consistent with the three month period ended June 30, 2011 for the rest of the year in the Asia Pacific operating segment.sales growth. We ~~now~~ expect selling prices will be down approximately 1 percent on a global basis for 2011 largely due to governmental healthcare cost containment efforts and continuing pricing pressure from local hospitals and health systems.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rates

For the three month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, foreign currency exchange rates resulted in a 65 percent increase in sales. Assuming currency rates remain at ~~June~~September 30, 2011 rates, for the year ending December 31, 2011, we estimate that an overall weaker U.S. Dollar versus foreign currency exchange rates will have a positive effect of approximately 32.5 percent on sales. We seek to mitigate currency risk through regular operating and financing activities and, under appropriate circumstances and subject to proper authorization, through the use of forward contracts and foreign currency options solely for managing foreign currency volatility and risk. Changes to foreign currency exchange rates affect sales growth, but due to offsetting gains/losses on hedge contracts, which are recorded in cost of products sold, the effect on net earnings in the near term is expected to be minimal.

2011 Outlook

We estimate our sales will grow between ~~5.5~~4.8 and ~~6.5~~5.2 percent for the full year in 2011. Such sales growth assumes the market for global knee and hip procedures will be flat to slightly positive. As discussed previously, we expect pricing to have a negative effect on sales growth of approximately 1 percent, and foreign currency exchange rates to have a positive effect on sales growth of approximately 32.5 percent based upon ~~June~~September 30, 2011 rates.

Assuming currencies remain at ~~June~~September 30, 2011 rates, we expect our gross margin to be approximately 75 percent of sales in 2011. This takes into account anticipated losses from foreign currency hedge contracts resulting from relative weakness in the U.S. Dollar. We expect to continue making investments in research and development (R&D) in the range of 55.0 to 5.5 percent of sales. Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) as a percent of sales is expected to be approximately 41 percent as we continue to invest to further build out our global sales channels and realize a higher mix of revenues from overseas markets.

We expect to incur ~~$75~~$55 to ~~$80~~$60 million of expenses in 2011 related to ongoing global restructuring and transformation initiatives. We also expect to incur an additional $15 to $20 million for certain integration costs connected with recent acquisitions. We anticipate recognizing some of the ~~$90~~$70 to ~~$100~~$80 million in cost of products sold and the majority in “Special items” on our statement of net earnings. The gross margin and SG&A percentages discussed above do not include these expenses.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Net Sales by Operating Segment

The following tables present net sales by operating segment and the components of the percentage changes (dollars in millions):

Three Months Ended

June 30, Volume/
Foreign

2011 2010 % Inc Mix Price Exchange

Americas $ 608.6 $ 609.3 — % 1 % (1 ) % — %
Europe 324.7 276.5 17 5 — 12
Asia Pacific 204.1 171.9 19 7 (1 ) 13

Total $ 1,137.4 $ 1,057.7 8 3 (1 ) 6


	Three Months Ended September 30,				% Inc			Volume/ Mix			Price			Foreign Exchange
	2011		2010		% Inc			Volume/ Mix			Price			Foreign Exchange
Americas	$	582.1	$	583.2		—	%		1	%		(2	)%		1	%
Europe		252.5		215.8		17			6			1			10
Asia Pacific		196.9		166.0		19			8			(1	)		12

Total	$	1,031.5	$	965.0		7			3			(1	)		5

“Foreign Exchange” as used in the tables in this report represents the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on sales growth.

Six Months Ended

June 30, Volume/
Foreign

2011 2010 % Inc Mix Price Exchange

Americas $ 1,238.3 $ 1,225.0 1 % 2 % (1 ) % — %
Europe 623.9 562.6 11 4 1 6
Asia Pacific 390.8 332.9 17 9 (2 ) 10

Total $ 2,253.0 $ 2,120.5 6 4 (1 ) 3


	Nine Months Ended September 30,				% Inc			Volume/ Mix			Price			Foreign Exchange
	2011		2010		% Inc			Volume/ Mix			Price			Foreign Exchange
Americas	$	1,820.4	$	1,808.2		1	%		2	%		(2	)%		1	%
Europe		876.4		778.4		13			4			1			8
Asia Pacific		587.7		498.9		18			8			(1	)		11

Total	$	3,284.5	$	3,085.5		6			4			(1	)		3

Net Sales by Product Category

The following tables present net sales by product category and the components of the percentage changes (dollars in millions):

Three Months Ended

June 30, % Inc
Volume/
Foreign

2011 2010 (Dec) Mix Price Exchange

Reconstructive

Knees $ 470.9 $ 452.9 4 % 1 % (2 ) % 5 %
Hips 345.0 317.1 9 4 (2 ) 7
Extremities 40.7 38.2 7 5 (1 ) 3

Total 856.6 808.2 6 2 (2 ) 6

Dental 67.1 55.9 20 8 8 4
Trauma 69.1 57.8 20 12 2 6
Spine 56.4 57.9 (3 ) (5 ) (1 ) 3
Surgical and other 88.2 77.9 13 8 — 5

Total $ 1,137.4 $ 1,057.7 8 3 (1 ) 6

Six Months Ended

June 30, % Inc
Volume/
Foreign

2011 2010 (Dec) Mix Price Exchange

Reconstructive

Knees $ 933.1 $ 913.3 2 % 1 % (2 ) % 3 %
Hips 682.3 632.8 8 5 (2 ) 5
Extremities 83.6 76.6 9 8 (1 ) 2

Total 1,699.0 1,622.7 5 3 (2 ) 4

Dental 129.5 107.6 20 9 9 2
Trauma 139.2 118.2 18 13 1 4
Spine 113.3 117.9 (4 ) (4 ) (2 ) 2
Surgical and other 172.0 154.1 12 7 — 5

Total $ 2,253.0 $ 2,120.5 6 4 (1 ) 3


	Three Months Ended September 30,				% Inc (Dec)			Volume/ Mix			Price			Foreign Exchange
	2011		2010		% Inc (Dec)			Volume/ Mix			Price			Foreign Exchange
Reconstructive
Knees	$	416.7	$	402.9		3	%		2	%		(2	)%		3	%
Hips		315.6		287.3		10			6			(2	)		6
Extremities		36.0		33.6		7			5			(1	)		3

Total		768.3		723.8		6			3			(2	)		5

Dental		55.1		49.0		12			1			8			3
Trauma		69.3		58.1		19			14			—			5
Spine		55.2		56.5		(2	)		(4	)		(1	)		3
Surgical and other		83.6		77.6		8			4			—			4

Total	$	1,031.5	$	965.0		7			3			(1	)		5


	Nine Months Ended September 30,				% Inc (Dec)			Volume/ Mix			Price			Foreign Exchange
	2011		2010		% Inc (Dec)			Volume/ Mix			Price			Foreign Exchange
Reconstructive
Knees	$	1,349.8	$	1,316.2		3	%		1	%		(2	)%		4	%
Hips		997.9		920.1		8			5			(2	)		5
Extremities		119.6		110.2		9			7			(1	)		3

Total		2,467.3		2,346.5		5			3			(2	)		4

Dental		184.6		156.6		18			7			8			3
Trauma		208.5		176.3		18			13			1			4
Spine		168.5		174.4		(3	)		(5	)		(1	)		3
Surgical and other		255.6		231.7		10			6			—			4

Total	$	3,284.5	$	3,085.5		6			4			(1	)		3

The following table presents net sales by product category by region (dollars in millions):

Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
2011 2010 % Inc (Dec) 2011 2010 % Inc (Dec)

Reconstructive

Knees
Americas
$ 266.5 $ 279.8 (5 ) % $ 544.3 $ 566.0 (4 ) %
Europe
127.9 106.1 21 245.1 219.7 12
Asia Pacific
76.5 67.0 14 143.7 127.6 13
Hips
Americas
151.4 148.4 2 306.0 295.2 4
Europe
121.8 109.2 12 236.0 221.0 7
Asia Pacific
71.8 59.5 20 140.3 116.6 20
Extremities
Americas
31.1 29.6 5 64.3 59.2 9
Europe
6.9 6.2 10 13.7 12.7 8
Asia Pacific
2.7 2.4 14 5.6 4.7 20

Total 856.6 808.2 6 1,699.0 1,622.7 5

Dental
Americas
33.6 28.5 18 68.3 55.7 23
Europe
25.0 21.4 16 45.7 40.2 13
Asia Pacific
8.5 6.0 44 15.5 11.7 33
Trauma
Americas
35.1 31.3 12 72.1 63.9 13
Europe
15.9 11.2 43 30.0 23.0 31
Asia Pacific
18.1 15.3 19 37.1 31.3 18
Spine
Americas
37.3 41.7 (11 ) 76.1 85.7 (11 )
Europe
14.4 12.6 15 28.2 25.5 11
Asia Pacific
4.7 3.6 29 9.0 6.7 34
Surgical and other
Americas
53.6 50.0 7 107.2 99.3 8
Europe
12.8 9.8 32 25.2 20.5 23
Asia Pacific
21.8 18.1 20 39.6 34.3 15

Total $ 1,137.4 $ 1,057.7 8 $ 2,253.0 $ 2,120.5 6


	Three Months Ended September 30,							Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011		2010		% Inc (Dec)			2011		2010		% Inc (Dec)
Reconstructive
Knees
Americas	$	252.7	$	263.3		(4	)%	$	797.0	$	829.3		(4	)%
Europe		89.9		77.4		16			335.0		297.1		13
Asia Pacific		74.1		62.2		19			217.8		189.8		15
Hips
Americas		142.2		142.3		—			448.2		437.5		2
Europe		103.5		88.1		18			339.5		309.1		10
Asia Pacific		69.9		56.9		23			210.2		173.5		21
Extremities
Americas		27.5		26.3		5			91.8		85.5		7
Europe		6.0		4.9		21			19.7		17.6		11
Asia Pacific		2.5		2.4		7			8.1		7.1		15

Total		768.3		723.8		6			2,467.3		2,346.5		5

Dental
Americas		32.8		27.6		18			101.1		83.3		21
Europe		15.8		14.4		10			61.5		54.6		12
Asia Pacific		6.5		7.0		(7	)		22.0		18.7		18
Trauma
Americas		36.6		32.3		13			108.7		96.2		13
Europe		14.6		11.0		33			44.6		34.0		31
Asia Pacific		18.1		14.8		22			55.2		46.1		20
Spine
Americas		37.6		40.8		(8	)		113.7		126.5		(10	)
Europe		11.8		11.1		7			40.0		36.6		10
Asia Pacific		5.8		4.6		23			14.8		11.3		30
Surgical and other
Americas		52.7		50.6		4			159.9		149.9		7
Europe		10.9		8.9		22			36.1		29.4		23
Asia Pacific		20.0		18.1		11			59.6		52.4		14

Total	$	1,031.5	$	965.0		7		$	3,284.5	$	3,085.5		6

Knees

Knee sales increased 43 percent ~~and 2 percent~~ in both the three and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, respectively, when compared to the same prior year periods. We estimate that industry procedure volumes were ~~likely~~ flat to slightly positive on a global basis in the first ~~half~~nine months of 2011, while pricing was negative. ~~Whileyear-over-year~~ ~~comparisons ease in the second half of 2011, we~~We believe procedure volumes will continue to be pressured from a cyclical downturn related to ~~unemployment levels.~~

macroeconomic conditions.

TheNexGen^® Complete Knee Solution product line, includingGender Solutions^® Knee Femoral Implants, theNexGenLPS-Flex Knee and theNexGenCR-Flex Knee, together with theGender Solutions Natural-Knee^®Flex System, led knee sales. In addition, sales of theGender SolutionsPatello Femoral Joint andZimmer^®Patient Specific Instruments exhibited growth. In ~~Europe, we completed a large tender contract to the ministry of health in a~~

~~government-run healthcare system in the three month period ended June 30, 2011, which contributed to knee sales growth in that operating segment. Additionally in~~ Europe, changes in foreign currency exchange rates positively affected knee sales by 129 percent and 67 percent in the three and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, respectively. In Asia Pacific, changes in foreign currency exchange rates positively affected knee sales by 12 percent ~~and 11 percent~~ in both the three and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2011, respectively.~~

2011.

Hips

Hip sales increased 910 percent and 8 percent in the three and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, respectively, when compared to the same prior year periods. The increase was driven primarily by ourContinuum^® Acetabular System and ourZimmerM/L Taper Stem withKinectivTechnology. Additionally, negative publicity in the marketplace over the use of hip systems that usemetal-on-metal technology may have contributed to an increase in sales of hip systems with alternative bearing surfaces.Metal-on-metal technology represents only a small portion of our hip sales. Therefore, our market share position may have benefited from customers using our hip systems instead of a competitor’s metal-on-metal system.

~~metal-on-metal~~ ~~system.~~

TheZimmerM/L Taper Stem, theZimmerM/L Taper Stem withKinectivTechnology, theCLS^®Spotorno^® Stem from theCLSHip System and theAlloclassic^®Zweymüller^®Hip Stem led hip stem ~~sales. In~~sales.In addition, sales of theContinuumAcetabular System,Trilogy^®IT Acetabular System andAllofit^®ITAlloclassicAcetabular System and theTrabecular MetalRevision Shell and Augment Cups were strong when compared to the prior year periods, as were sales ofBIOLOX^{^®¹}deltaHeads andFitmore^® Hip Stems. In Europe, changes in foreign currency exchange rates positively affected hip sales by 1312 percent and 78 percent in the three and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, respectively. In Asia Pacific, our December 2010 acquisition of Beijing Montagne Medical Device Co., Ltd. made a contribution to that operating segment’s sales growth in the three and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011. Additionally in Asia Pacific, changes in foreign currency exchange rates positively affected hip sales by 1312 percent ~~and 11 percent~~ in both the three and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, respectively.

Extremities

Extremities sales increased by 7 percent and 9 percent in the three and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, respectively, when compared to the same prior year periods. TheBigliani/Flatow^® Complete Shoulder Solution and theZimmer Trabecular MetalReverse Shoulder System led extremities sales. We continue to see competitive pressure in this category, but expect that new product and instrument introductions will help to accelerate growth.

Dental

Dental sales increased by 2012 percent and 18 percent in the three and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, respectively, when compared to the same prior year periods, including increases of 8 percent ~~and 9 percent, respectively,~~in both periods due to pricing. A significant portion of this pricing increase was due to a change in the agreement by which we distribute certain regenerative products. Under the prior agreement we did not take title to the products and only received a commission from the end-user sale. Under the new agreement, we take title to the product and recognize the final end-user sale along with the cost of products sold and any other selling-related costs. Sales were led by theTapered Screw-Vent^® Implant System.

Trauma

Trauma sales increased 2019 percent and 18 percent in the three and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, respectively, when compared to the same prior year periods. We have continued the launch of theZimmer Natural Nail^® System, which has significantly increased sales. In addition to theZimmer Natural NailSystem,ZimmerPeriarticular Locking Plates and theZimmer NCB^®Plating System led trauma sales, while sales of cable products also made a strong contribution.

¹~~BIOLOX~~^{^®} ~~is a trademark of CeramTec AG~~

Spine

~~Spine~~

Spine sales decreased 32 percent and 43 percent in the three and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, respectively, when compared to the same prior year periods. Our spine business in the Americas operating

¹BIOLOX^® is a trademark of CeramTec AG

segment continued to experience operational challenges, a difficult reimbursement landscape and challenges related to theDynesys^® Dynamic Stabilization System. Solid sales of thePathFinder^® andSequoia^® Pedicle Screw Systems, ourUniversal Clamp^TM System andTrabecular MetalTechnology products partly offset a decline in sales of theDynesysSystem.

Surgical and other

Surgical sales increased 138 percent and 1210 percent in the three and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, respectively, when compared to the same prior year periods. Surgical sales were led byPALACOS^{^®}² Bone Cement and tourniquet products. Our wound debridement products also made a strong contribution to sales results, as did our December 2010 acquisition of Sodem Diffusion S.A.

Expenses as a Percent of Net Sales

Three Months
Six Months Ended

Ended June 30, June 30,
2011 2010 Inc (Dec) 2011 2010 Inc (Dec)

Cost of products sold 25.3 % 23.7 % 1.6 25.2 % 24.5 % 0.7
Research and development 5.0 5.1 (0.1 ) 5.0 4.9 0.1
Selling, general and administrative 41.3 41.4 (0.1 ) 41.2 41.8 (0.6 )
Certain claims 4.4 7.1 (2.7 ) 2.2 3.5 (1.3 )
Special items 1.2 1.1 0.1 1.7 0.7 1.0
Operating profit 22.8 21.6 1.2 24.7 24.6 0.1


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Inc (Dec)			Nine Months Ended September 30,						Inc (Dec)
	2011			2010			Inc (Dec)			2011			2010			Inc (Dec)
Cost of products sold		24.4	%		22.7	%		1.7			24.9	%		23.9	%		1.0
Research and development		5.9			5.9			0.0			5.3			5.3			0.0
Selling, general and administrative		43.0			42.7			0.3			41.8			42.1			(0.3	)
Certain claims		—			—			0.0			1.5			2.4			(0.9	)
Special items		0.8			0.5			0.3			1.4			0.6			0.8
Operating profit		25.8			28.1			(2.3	)		25.1			25.7			(0.6	)

Cost of Products Sold

The increase in cost of products sold as a percentage of net sales for the three month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 compared to the same prior year period is primarily due to foreign currency hedge losses recorded in the current year period compared to foreign currency hedge gains recorded in the prior year period. Under our hedging program, for derivatives which qualify as hedges of future cash flows, the effective portion of changes in fair value is temporarily recorded in other comprehensive income and then recognized in cost of products sold when the hedged item affects earnings. Additionally, the average cost per unit as a percentage of net sales was higher in the current year period than the prior year period, ~~but this~~partially due to lower average selling prices. This was partially offset by lower excess and obsolescence charges from some product specific matters and lower royalty expense.

The increase in cost of products sold as a percentage of net sales for the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 compared to the same prior year period is primarily due to foreign currency losses recorded in the current year period compared to foreign currency hedge gains recorded in the prior year period. ~~This~~Additionally, inventory step-up costs and the average cost per unit as a percentage of net sales was higher in the current year period than the prior year period, but this was partially offset by lower royalty ~~expense.~~

expense and lower excess and obsolescence charges from some product specific matters.

Operating Expenses

R&D expenses increased in both the three and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, when compared to the same prior year periods, while R&D as a percent of sales stayed ~~relatively stable~~the same when comparing to the same periods. The expense increase is in line with our strategy to focus more investment into new product development activities across nearly all of our product categories as well as to increase spending on external research, clinical, regulatory and quality initiatives. We expect R&D spending in 2011 to be 55.0 to 5.5 percent of sales for the full year.

²PALACOS^{^®} is a trademark of Heraeus Kulzer GmbH

SG&A expenses increased in dollar terms in the three and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2011, but have decreased~~2011. SG&A as a percent of sales was higher in the three month period ended September 30, 2011, when compared to the same prior year ~~periods.~~period, but was lower for the 2011 nine month period compared to the prior year. The dollar increases in both the three and ~~six~~nine month periods are primarily from variable selling and distribution expenses resulting from higher net sales in the 2011 periods compared to the 2010 periods, increased intangible amortization from our December 2010 acquisitions and other intangible asset investments, the weakening of the U.S. Dollar which resulted in higher translated expenses from international subsidiaries, and higher medical education expenses as we ~~continue~~have continued to expand training and education on the safe and effective use of our products.

In the three month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, SG&A as a percent of sales ~~was only slightly lower than~~increased by 30 basis points from the same prior year period ~~as savings from certain cost savings initiatives have been reinvested in sales channels in emerging~~primarily due to increased legal costs, including product liability related costs, and ~~other key markets and a~~ higher ~~mix of revenues in overseas markets.~~

bad debt expenses.

In the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, SG&A as a percent of sales decreased by 6030 basis ~~points~~points. While there was an increase in product liability related costs in the third quarter of 2011 compared to the third quarter of 2010, for ~~similar reasons as~~ the ~~three~~nine month period in ~~addition to lower~~2011 product liability ~~costs.~~related costs were significantly lower than the prior year period. See Note 1514 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for a more complete discussion of product liability claims.

In addition to the lower product liability related costs, we have implemented a variety of other savings initiatives.

“Certain claims” expense is a provision for estimated liabilities toDuromCup patients undergoing revision surgeries. A provision of $104.0 million was originally recorded during 2008 and 2009 with an additional $50.0 million and $75.0 million recorded during the ~~three~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, bringing the total provision to $229.0 million for these claims. For more information regarding these claims, see Note 1514 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

“Special items” for the three and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 increased to ~~$13.5~~$8.0 million and ~~$39.0~~$47.0 million, respectively, from ~~$11.5~~$5.0 million and ~~$14.1~~$19.1 million in the same prior year periods, respectively. The largest component of “Special items” in 2011 was employee severance and termination-related expenses resulting from a reduction in management layers, expansion of management spans of control, and changes in our organizational structure. “Special items” also includes expenses relating to integration of business acquisitions, ~~and~~ fixed asset ~~impairments.~~impairments, and consulting expenses related to quality and operational excellence initiatives. The 2010 expenses were primarily related to expenses resulting from business acquisitions. See Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for more information regarding “Special items” charges.

Interest Expense, Income Taxes and Net Earnings

Interest expense, net for the three and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, decreased to ~~$9.8~~$11.7 million and ~~$20.8~~$32.5 million, respectively, from ~~$14.3~~$14.2 million and ~~$28.9~~$43.1 million in the same prior year periods, respectively. The decrease in interest expense is the result of interest rate swap agreements we entered into in late 2010 and early 2011 to convert a portion of our fixed-rate debt into variable-rate debt. Additionally, interest income has increased due to higher balances of cash and cash equivalents and short-term and long-term investments and higher returns on certain investments.

The effective tax rate on earnings before income taxes for the three and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 decreased to ~~18.2~~25.0 percent and ~~22.9~~23.6 percent, respectively, from ~~22.6~~25.8 percent and ~~24.8~~25.1 percent in the same prior year periods, respectively. The effective tax rates in the 2011 periods were positively affected by the favorable resolution of certain tax matters and the tax effect of the “Certain claims” provision. The effective tax rates in the 2010 periods were positively affected by the “Certain claims” provision. We anticipate the outcome of various federal, state and foreign audits as well as expiration of certain statutes of limitations could potentially impact our 2011 effective tax rate in ~~future quarters.~~the fourth quarter. Currently, we cannot reasonably estimate the impact of these items on our financial results.

Net earnings ~~increased 23 percent to $203.8~~were almost flat at $191.5 million for the three month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, compared to ~~$165.5~~$191.1 million in the same prior year period. Net earnings increased 118 percent to ~~$412.7~~$604.2 million for the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, compared to ~~$370.9~~$562.0 million in the same prior year period. The ~~improvements~~changes in net earnings were due to the changes in revenues and expenses discussed above. For the three month

period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, basic and diluted earnings per share ~~both~~ increased 296 percent and 5 percent, respectively, to ~~$1.06~~$1.02 and $1.01, respectively, from ~~$0.82~~$0.96 in the same prior year ~~period.~~periods. For the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, basic and diluted earnings per share ~~both~~ increased 1814 percent and 13 percent, respectively, to ~~$2.15~~$3.17 and ~~$2.14,~~$3.15, respectively, from ~~$1.83~~$2.79 and ~~$1.82,~~$2.78, respectively, in the same prior year ~~period.~~periods. The ~~disproportional~~disproportionate change in earnings per share as compared with net earnings is attributed to the effect of 2011 and 2010 share repurchases.

Non-GAAP operating performance measures

We use non-GAAP financial measures to evaluate our operating performance that differ from financial measures determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Our non-GAAP financial measures exclude the impact of inventorystep-up charges, “Certain claims” and “Special items,” and the taxes on those items in addition to certain other tax adjustments. We use this information internally and believe it is helpful to investors because it allows more meaningfulperiod-to-period comparisons of our ongoing operating results, it helps to perform trend analysis and to better identify operating trends that may otherwise be masked or distorted by these types of items, and it provides a higher degree of transparency of certain items. Certain of these non-GAAP financial measures are used as metrics for our incentive compensation programs.

Our non-GAAP adjusted net earnings used for internal management purposes for the three and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 were ~~$232.5~~$197.2 million and ~~$463.4~~$660.6 million, respectively, compared to ~~$221.2~~$192.4 million and ~~$428.6~~$621.0 million in the same prior year periods, respectively. Our non-GAAP adjusted diluted earnings per share for the three and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 were ~~$1.21~~$1.04 and ~~$2.40,~~$3.44, respectively, compared to ~~$1.09~~$0.96 and ~~$2.10~~$3.07 in the same prior year periods, respectively.

Our non-GAAP adjusted net earnings and adjusted diluted earnings per share increased in the 2011 periods compared to the 2010 periods due to increased sales, disciplined spending in SG&A, and lower product liability costs. These improvements were slightly offset by higher product costs, higher surgeon medical training and education expenses and additional intangible amortization.

The following are reconciliations from our GAAP net earnings and diluted earnings per share to our non-GAAP adjusted net earnings and non-GAAP adjusted diluted earnings per share.

Three Months
Six Months

Ended
Ended

June 30, June 30,
(In millions) 2011 2010 2011 2010

Net Earnings of Zimmer Holdings, Inc. $ 203.8 $ 165.5 $ 412.7 $ 370.9
Inventorystep-up
3.4 — 7.8 1.3
Certain claims 50.0 75.0 50.0 75.0
Special items 13.5 11.5 39.0 14.1
Taxes on inventorystep-up, certain claims and special items and tax adjustments related to resolution of certain tax matters*
(38.2 ) (30.8 ) (46.1 ) (32.7 )

Adjusted Net Earnings $ 232.5 $ 221.2 $ 463.4 $ 428.6


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
(In millions)	2011			2010			2011			2010
Net Earnings of Zimmer Holdings, Inc.	$	191.5		$	191.1		$	604.2		$	562.0
Inventory step-up		1.8			—			9.6			1.3
Certain claims		—			—			50.0			75.0
Special items		8.0			5.0			47.0			19.1
Taxes on inventory step-up, certain claims and special items and tax adjustments related to resolution of certain tax matters*		(4.1	)		(3.7	)		(50.2	)		(36.4	)

Adjusted Net Earnings	$	197.2		$	192.4		$	660.6		$	621.0


*		The tax effect is calculated based upon the statutory rates for the jurisdictions where the items were incurred.

Three Months
Six Months

Ended
Ended

June 30, June 30,
2011 2010 2011 2010

Diluted EPS $ 1.06 $ 0.82 $ 2.14 $ 1.82
Inventorystep-up
0.02 — 0.04 0.01
Certain claims 0.26 0.37 0.26 0.37
Special items 0.07 0.05 0.20 0.06
Taxes on inventorystep-up, certain claims and special items and tax adjustments related to resolution of certain tax matters*
(0.20 ) (0.15 ) (0.24 ) (0.16 )

Adjusted Diluted EPS $ 1.21 $ 1.09 $ 2.40 $ 2.10


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Diluted EPS	$	1.01		$	0.96		$	3.15		$	2.78
Inventory step-up		0.01			—			0.05			0.01
Certain claims		—			—			0.26			0.37
Special items		0.04			0.02			0.24			0.09
Taxes on inventory step-up, certain claims and special items and tax adjustments related to resolution of certain tax matters*		(0.02	)		(0.02	)		(0.26	)		(0.18	)

Adjusted Diluted EPS	$	1.04		$	0.96		$	3.44		$	3.07


*		The tax effect is calculated based upon the statutory rates for the jurisdictions where the items were incurred.

Healthcare Reform in the U.S.

We continue to assess the impact that federal healthcare reform will have on our business. Federal healthcare reform includes a 2.3 percent excise tax on a majority of our U.S. sales that is scheduled to be implemented in 2013.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash flows provided by operating activities were ~~$433.2~~$783.8 million for the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, compared to ~~$532.2~~$852.5 million in the same prior year period. The principal source of cash from operating activities was net earnings. Non-cash items included in net earnings accounted for another ~~$214.2~~$321.3 million of operating cash. All other items of operating cash flows reflect a use of ~~$193.7~~$141.4 million of cash, compared to a use of ~~$36.4~~$5.7 million in the same 2010 period. The lower cash flows provided by operating activities in the 2011 period were primarily due to lower receivable collections, investments in inventory, increased pension funding, and increased product liability payments.

At ~~June~~September 30, 2011, we had 6871 days of sales outstanding in trade accounts receivable, which represents an increase of 23 days compared to ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 and an increase of 74 days compared to ~~June~~September 30, 2010, reflecting changes in certain accounts receivable factoring programs and the economic environment in our Europe operating segment. At ~~June~~September 30, 2011, we had ~~307~~348 days of inventory on hand, which is ~~a decrease~~an increase of 541 days compared to ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 and a decrease of 1132 days from ~~June~~September 30, 2010. ~~Despite an~~The third quarter increase over the second quarter reflects the pattern of seasonality in ~~inventory value~~our reconstructive business. In comparison to ~~support new product launches,~~September 30, 2010, days of inventory on hand have decreased ~~slightly~~ due to higher cost of products sold ~~that are part~~as a percentage of ~~the denominator~~net sales, most notably from foreign currency hedge losses, and a reduction in ~~this calculation.~~

��

U.S. consignment inventory.

Cash flows used in investing activities were ~~$162.5~~$411.1 million for the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, compared to ~~$91.9~~$235.4 million in the same prior year period. Additions to instruments ~~increased~~have decreased slightly in the 2011 ~~period compared to the 2010 period to support new product launches, such as our~~~~Continuum~~~~Acetabular System, and to support sales growth.~~period. Spending on other property, plant and equipment increased in the 2011 period compared to the 2010 period, reflecting cash outlays necessary to complete new product-related investments, ~~and~~ replace older machinery and ~~equipment.~~equipment, and invest in software technologies. We invest our cash and cash equivalents in highly rated debt securities. The purchases and any sales or maturities of these investments are reflected as cash flows from investing activities. We increased our purchases of investments beginning in the second half of 2010 and into 2011, which explains the increased investment activity in the first ~~six~~nine months of 2011 compared to the same 2010 period. Investments in other assets increased in the 2011 period compared to the 2010 period primarily for payments to acquire certain foreign-based distributors and payments for exclusive distribution rights for certain products.

Cash flows used in financing activities were ~~$324.3~~$493.3 million for the ~~three~~nine month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, compared to ~~$169.8~~$390.6 million in the same 2010 period. In the 2011 period, we borrowed $375.2 million under our $1,350 million revolving, multi-currency, senior unsecured credit facility (Senior Credit Facility). With those borrowings in addition to operating cash flows, we repurchased ~~6.1~~16.2 million common shares for a total of ~~$357.2~~$906.5 million, including commissions, under our share repurchase program authorized by our Board of Directors, compared to ~~$178.9~~$404.6 million in the same 2010 period. Proceeds from our stock compensation plans increased in the ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, compared to the same 2010 period, due to an increase in employee stock option exercises.

We have two outstanding tranches of senior unsecured ~~senior~~ notes (Senior Notes): $500 million aggregate principal amount of 4.625 percent Senior Notes due November 30, 2019 and $500 million aggregate principal amount of 5.75 percent Senior Notes due November 30, 2039. Interest on the Senior Notes is payable on May 30 and November 30 of each year until maturity.

We may redeem the Senior Notes at our election in whole or in part at any time prior to maturity at a redemption price equal to the greater of 1) 100 percent of the principal amount of the notes being redeemed; or 2) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest (not including any

portion of such payments of interest accrued as of the date of redemption), discounted to the date of redemption on a semi-annual basis at the Treasury Rate (as defined in the debt agreement), plus 20 basis points, in the case of the 2019 notes, and 25 basis points, in the case of the 2039 notes. We will also pay the accrued and unpaid interest on the Senior Notes to the redemption date.

~~We have a five year $1,350 million revolving, multi-currency, senior unsecured credit facility maturing~~Our Senior Credit Facility will mature on November 30, ~~2012 (Senior Credit Facility).~~2012. We had ~~$143.0~~$518.0 million in outstanding borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility as of ~~June~~September 30, 2011, and an availability of ~~$1,207.0~~$832.0 million.

We also have available uncommitted credit facilities totaling ~~$53.5~~$61.7 million.

We place our cash and cash equivalents in highly rated financial institutions and limit the amount of credit exposure to any one entity. We invest only in high-quality financial instruments in accordance with our internal investment policy.

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2011, we had short-term and long-term investments in debt securities with a fair value of ~~$425.7~~$586.1 million. These investments are in debt securities of many different issuers and therefore we have no significant concentration of risk with a single issuer. All of these debt securities are highly-rated and therefore we believe the risk of default by the ~~issuer~~issuers is low.

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2011, ~~$909.4~~$1,008.7 million of our cash and cash equivalents and short-term and long-term investments are held in jurisdictions outside of the U.S and expected to be indefinitely reinvested for continued use in foreign operations. Repatriation of these assets to the U.S. would have negative tax consequences. Approximately ~~$780~~$870.0 million of this amount is denominated in U.S. Dollars and therefore bears no foreign currency translation risk. The balance of these assets is denominated in currencies of the various countries where we operate.

We may use excess cash to repurchase additional common stock under our share repurchase program. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2011, approximately ~~$0.8~~$0.3 billion remained authorized under a $1.5 billion repurchase program, which will expire on December 31, 2013.

Management believes that cash flows from operations and available borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility are sufficient to meet our working capital, capital expenditure and debt service needs. Should investment opportunities arise, we believe that our earnings, balance sheet and cash flows will allow us to obtain additional capital, if necessary.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

There are no recently issued accounting pronouncements that we have not yet adopted that are expected to have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Critical Accounting Estimates
There were no changes in the nine month period ended September 30, 2011 to the application of critical accounting policies as described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. As discussed in the prior year Annual Report on Form 10-K, our annual impairment test of goodwill occurs in the fourth quarter every year. In 2010, the annual impairment test resulted in an impairment charge related to our U.S. Spine reporting unit. Accordingly, the estimated fair value of that reporting unit did not substantially exceed its carrying value. We have other reporting units with goodwill assigned to them. As of the annual impairment test in 2010, the estimated fair values for those reporting units substantially exceeded their carrying values.

Forward-Looking Statements

This quarterly report contains certain statements that are forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. When used in this report, the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “would,” “could,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “plan,” “seek,” “believe,” “predict,” “estimate,” “potential,” “project,” “target,” “forecast,” “intend,” “strategy,” “future,” “opportunity,” “assume,” “guide” and similar expressions are intended

to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:

our compliance through 2012 with the Corporate Integrity Agreement we entered into as part of the 2007 settlement with the U.S. government;

the outcome of the investigation by the U.S. government into Foreign Corrupt Practices Act matters announced in 2007;


	•	~~our compliance through 2012 with the Corporate Integrity Agreement we entered into as part of the 2007 settlement with the United States government;~~

	•	~~the outcome of the investigation by the U.S. government into Foreign Corrupt Practices Act matters announced in 2007;~~

	•	~~competition;~~

	•	~~pricing pressures;~~

	•	~~changes in customer demand for our products and services caused by demographic changes or other factors;~~

	•	~~dependence on new product development, technological advances and innovation;~~

competition;

pricing pressures;

changes in customer demand for our products and services caused by demographic changes or other factors;

dependence on new product development, technological advances and innovation;

product liability claims;

retention of our independent agents and distributors;

our ability to protect proprietary technology and other intellectual property and claims for infringement of the intellectual property rights of third parties;

the possible disruptive effect of additional strategic acquisitions and our ability to successfully integrate acquired companies;

our ability to form and implement strategic alliances;

our dependence on a limited number of suppliers for key raw materials and outsourced activities;

the impact of the federal healthcare reform legislation, including the impact of the new excise tax on medical devices;

reductions in reimbursement levels by third-party payors and cost containment efforts of healthcare purchasing organizations;

challenges relating to changes in and compliance with governmental laws and regulations affecting our U.S. and international businesses, including regulations of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and foreign government regulators, such as more stringent requirements for regulatory clearance of our products;

tax reform measures, tax authority examinations and associated tax risks and potential obligations;

the success of our quality and operational improvement initiatives, including our ability to successfully resolve the observations contained in Form FDA-483 following the July 2011 inspection of our Warsaw, Indiana facility;

the costs of defending or resolving putative class action litigation arising out of trading or ownership of our stock;

changes in prices of raw materials and products and our ability to control costs and expenses;

changes in general domestic and international economic conditions, including interest rate and currency exchange rate fluctuations;

changes in general industry and market conditions, including domestic and international growth rates; and

shifts in our product category sales mix or our regional sales mix away from products or geographic regions that generate higher operating margins.


	•	~~product liability claims;~~

	•	~~retention of our independent agents and distributors;~~

	•	~~our ability to protect proprietary technology and other intellectual property and claims for infringement of the intellectual property rights of third parties;~~

	•	~~the possible disruptive effect of additional strategic acquisitions and our ability to successfully integrate acquired companies;~~

	•	~~our ability to form and implement strategic alliances;~~

	•	~~our dependence on a limited number of suppliers for key raw materials and outsourced activities;~~

	•	~~the impact of the federal healthcare reform legislation, including the impact of the new excise tax on medical devices;~~

	•	~~reductions in reimbursement levels by third-party payors and cost containment efforts of healthcare purchasing organizations;~~

	•	challenges relating to changes in and compliance with governmental laws and regulations affecting our U.S. and international businesses, including regulations of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and foreign government regulators, such as more stringent requirements for regulatory clearance of our products;

	•	~~tax reform measures, tax authority examinations and associated tax risks and potential obligations;~~

	•	~~the success of our quality and operational improvement initiatives;~~

	•	~~the costs of defending or resolving putative class action litigation arising out of trading or ownership of our stock;~~

	•	~~changes in prices of raw materials and products and our ability to control costs and expenses;~~

	•	~~changes in general domestic and international economic conditions, including interest rate and currency exchange rate fluctuations;~~

	•	~~changes in general industry and market conditions, including domestic and international growth rates; and~~

	•	~~shifts in our product category sales mix or our regional sales mix away from products or geographic regions that generate higher operating margins.~~

Our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 contains a detailed discussion of these and other important factors under the heading “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item IA of that report. You should understand that it is not possible to predict or identify all factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from forward-looking statements. Consequently, you should not consider any list or discussion of such factors to be a complete set of all potential risks or uncertainties.

Readers of this report are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. While we believe the assumptions on which the forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, there can be no assurance that these forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate. This cautionary statement is applicable to all forward-looking statements contained in this report.

We expressly disclaim any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. You are advised, however, to consult any further disclosures we make on related subjects in ourForm ~~10-Q,8-K~~10-Q, 8-K and10-K reports and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


Item 3.	*Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk*

There have been no material changes other than what is discussed below from the information provided in our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Credit Risk

As discussed in the Annual Report on Form 10-K, essentially all of our trade receivables are concentrated in the public and private hospital and healthcare industry in the U.S. and internationally or with distributors or dealers who operate in international markets and, accordingly, are exposed to their respective business, economic and country specific variables. Repayment is dependent upon the financial stability of these industry sectors and the respective countries’ national economic and healthcare systems. In our Europe operating segment more so than our other operating segments, healthcare is sponsored by governments. We continue to monitor the credit and economic conditions in Europe and the effects it may have on our ability to collect outstanding trade receivables. We believe our current reserves for losses are adequate, but if conditions worsen we may have to make adjustments to our allowance for doubtful accounts in the future.


Item 4.	*Controls and Procedures*

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inRules 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Because of inherent limitations, disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of disclosure controls and procedures are met.

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective at a reasonable assurance level.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined inRule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Part II — Other Information


Item 1.	*Legal Proceedings*

Information pertaining to legal proceedings can be found in Note 1514 to the interim condensed consolidated financial statements included in Part I of this report.


Item 1A.	*Risk Factors*

There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2010.~~

2010, except for the following:

In July 2011, we received Form FDA-483 Inspectional Observations from the FDA concerning quality systems at our Warsaw, Indiana manufacturing facility and we may not be able to timely and adequately address the quality system issues raised by the FDA.

Following a July 2011 routine inspection of our Warsaw, Indiana manufacturing facility, the FDA issued a Form 483 notice. The Form 483 notice identified certain inspectional observations regarding the facility’s quality systems. The facility manufactures reconstructive products that are sold globally. We have responded in writing to the observations and met with representatives of the district office of the FDA to discuss our response and action plans. We expect the FDA to conduct a re-inspection of this facility in the future to determine whether we have taken sufficient actions to address the observations described in the Form 483 notice. If the FDA is not satisfied with our response to the issues identified in the Form 483 notice, the FDA could take additional actions such as issuing a warning letter to us, which, among other things, could adversely affect our ability to receive approvals of regulatory applications until the issues are resolved. Any of these possible sanctions could have an adverse impact on our revenues, financial position, results of operations and cash flows, and otherwise harm our business and reputation.


Item 2.	*Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds*

The following table summarizes repurchases of common stock settled during the three month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011:

Total Number of
Approximate

Shares Purchased
Dollar Value of

as Part of
Shares that May

Total Number
Publicly
Yet Be Purchased

of Shares
Average Price
Announced Plans
Under Plans

Purchased Paid per Share or Programs* or Programs

April 2011 — $ — 63,267,163 $ 969,670,852
May 2011 1,040,000 69.16 64,307,163 897,748,742
June 2011 789,000 62.33 65,096,163 848,568,032

Total 1,829,000 $ 66.21 65,096,163 $ 848,568,032


	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs*		Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under Plans or Programs
July 2011		—	$	—		65,096,163	$	848,568,032
August 2011		4,023,400		52.79		69,119,563		636,158,255
September 2011		6,089,687		55.29		75,209,250		299,444,449

Total		10,113,087	$	54.30		75,209,250	$	299,444,449

* Includes repurchases made under expired programs as well as the current program authorizing $1.5 billion of repurchases through December 31, 2013.

Item 5.

Other Information


~~Item 5.~~	*~~Other Information~~*

During the ~~three month~~three-month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors was not asked to, and did not, approve the engagement of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, to perform any non-audit services. This disclosure is made pursuant to Section 10A(i)(2) of the Exchange Act, as added by Section 202 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Item 6. Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed or furnished as part of this report:

31 .1 Certification pursuant toRule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of the Chief Executive Officer, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31 .2 Certification pursuant toRule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of the Chief Financial Officer, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32 Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101 .INS XBRL Instance Document*
101 .SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document*
101 .CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document*
101 .LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document*
101 .PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document*
101 .DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document*


*
~~Pursuant~~ 31.1		Certification pursuant to~~Regulation S-T,~~ this interactive data file is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ~~and otherwise is not subject~~of the Chief Executive Officer, as adopted pursuant to ~~liability under these sections.~~Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2		Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of the Chief Financial Officer, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32		Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

SIGNATURES

~~SIGNATURES~~

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



	ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC.
	(Registrant)
Date: November 2, 2011	By:
~~Date: August 8, 2011~~		~~By:~~		/s/ James T. Crines
			James T. Crines
	~~James T. Crines~~
				Executive Vice President, Finance and
				Chief Financial Officer


Date: November 2, 2011	By:
~~Date: August 8, 2011~~		~~By:~~		/s/ Derek M. Davis
			Derek M. Davis
	~~Derek M. Davis~~
				Vice President, Finance and Corporate
				Controller and Chief Accounting Officer


	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2011		2010		2011		2010

Net Sales	$	1,137.4	$	1,057.7	$	2,253.0	$	2,120.5
Cost of products sold		287.9		250.6		566.9		519.0

Gross Profit		849.5		807.1		1,686.1		1,601.5

Research and development		57.0		54.2		112.6		104.7
Selling, general and administrative		469.9		438.3		928.2		885.5
Certain claims (Note 15)		50.0		75.0		50.0		75.0
Special items (Note 2)		13.5		11.5		39.0		14.1

Operating expenses		590.4		579.0		1,129.8		1,079.3

Operating Profit		259.1		228.1		556.3		522.2
Interest expense, net		9.8		14.3		20.8		28.9

Earnings before income taxes		249.3		213.8		535.5		493.3
Provision for income taxes		45.5		48.3		122.8		122.4

Net Earnings of Zimmer Holdings, Inc.	$	203.8	$	165.5	$	412.7	$	370.9

Earnings Per Common Share
Basic	$	1.06	$	0.82	$	2.15	$	1.83
Diluted	$	1.06	$	0.82	$	2.14	$	1.82
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding
Basic		191.5		201.9		192.1		202.4
Diluted		192.7		203.0		193.3		203.6


	June 30,			December 31,
	2011			2010

ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	624.1		$	668.9
Short-term investments		321.4			265.1
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts		888.4			775.9
Inventories, net		975.1			936.4
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		66.7			127.7
Deferred income taxes		232.6			235.7

Total Current Assets		3,108.3			3,009.7
Property, plant and equipment, net		1,213.0			1,213.8
Goodwill		2,694.0			2,580.8
Intangible assets, net		811.5			827.1
Other assets		422.4			368.5

Total Assets	$	8,249.2		$	7,999.9


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	124.0		$	129.6
Income taxes		31.1			48.9
Other current liabilities		523.9			524.0

Total Current Liabilities		679.0			702.5
Other long-term liabilities		407.1			384.0
Long-term debt		1,147.3			1,142.1

Total Liabilities		2,233.4			2,228.6

Commitments and Contingencies (Note 15)
Stockholders’ Equity:
Common stock, $0.01 par value, one billion shares authorized, 255.5 million (254.6 million in 2010) issued		2.5			2.5
Paid-in capital		3,355.4			3,293.5
Retained earnings		6,111.3			5,699.4
Accumulated other comprehensive income		447.5			321.0
Treasury stock, 65.1 million shares (59.0 million shares in 2010)		(3,900.9	)		(3,545.1	)

Total Stockholders’ Equity		6,015.8			5,771.3

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	8,249.2		$	7,999.9


	For the Six Months
	Ended June 30,
	2011			2010

Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities:
Net earnings of Zimmer Holdings, Inc.	$	412.7		$	370.9
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		174.7			165.8
Share-based compensation		31.7			30.6
Income tax benefit from stock option exercises		9.5			2.9
Excess income tax benefit from stock option exercises		(3.6	)		(1.0	)
Inventorystep-up		7.8			1.3
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions:
Income taxes		(11.5	)		(70.5	)
Receivables		(76.0	)		(51.3	)
Inventories		(21.8	)		27.5
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(42.2	)		(37.4	)
Other assets and liabilities		(48.1	)		93.4

Net cash provided by operating activities		433.2			532.2

Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities:
Additions to instruments		(85.2	)		(83.1	)
Additions to other property, plant and equipment		(34.0	)		(26.7	)
Purchases of investments		(186.7	)		(4.0	)
Sales of investments		169.8			37.0
Investments in other assets		(26.4	)		(15.1	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(162.5	)		(91.9	)

Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities:
Net proceeds under revolving credit facilities		0.2			—
Proceeds from employee stock compensation plans		29.1			8.1
Excess income tax benefit from stock option exercises		3.6			1.0
Repurchase of common stock		(357.2	)		(178.9	)

Net cash used in financing activities		(324.3	)		(169.8	)

Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents		8.8			(8.5	)

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(44.8	)		262.0
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year		668.9			691.7

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	624.1		$	953.7


	Three Months					Six Months
	Ended					Ended
	June 30,					June 30,
	2011		2010			2011		2010

Impairment/loss on disposal of assets	$	0.4	$	7.7		$	2.9	$	8.1
Consulting and professional fees		4.9		0.9			8.4		1.9
Employee severance and retention		3.6		2.3			19.8		2.2
Information technology integration		—		—			—		0.1
Facility and employee relocation		0.6		0.5			0.9		0.5
Distributor acquisitions		0.5		—			1.1		—
Certain litigation matters		—		(0.5	)		0.1		(1.3	)
Contract terminations		1.7		0.6			2.7		2.6
Other		1.8		—			3.1		—

Special items	$	13.5	$	11.5		$	39.0	$	14.1


	Amortized			Gross Unrealized
	Cost			Gains		Losses			Fair value

As of June 30, 2011
Corporate debt securities	$	240.4		$	0.3	$	(0.1	)	$	240.6
U.S. government and agency debt securities		37.9			—		—			37.9
Municipal bonds		1.0			—		—			1.0
Foreign government debt securities		7.5			—		—			7.5
Commercial paper		9.5			—		—			9.5
Certificates of deposit		129.1			0.1		—			129.2

Total short and long-term investments	$	425.4		$	0.4	$	(0.1	)	$	425.7

As of December 31, 2010
Corporate debt securities	$	203.9	��	$	0.1	$	(0.2	)	$	203.8
U.S. government and agency debt securities		47.9			—		—			47.9
Municipal bonds		1.1			—		—			1.1
Foreign government debt securities		10.3			—		—			10.3
Commercial paper		16.1			—		—			16.1
Certificates of deposit		131.5			—		(0.1	)		131.4

Total short and long-term investments	$	410.8		$	0.1	$	(0.3	)	$	410.6


	As of June 30, 2011					As of December 31, 2010
			Unrealized					Unrealized
	Fair Value		Losses			Fair value		Losses

Corporate debt securities	$	62.4	$	(0.1	)	$	126.1	$	(0.2	)
Certificates of deposit		—		—			50.6		(0.1	)

Total	$	62.4	$	(0.1	)	$	176.7	$	(0.3	)


	As of June 30, 2011
			Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using:
			Quoted
			Prices in
			Active		Significant
			Markets for		Other		Significant
			Identical		Observable		Unobservable
	Recorded		Assets		Inputs		Inputs
Description	Balance		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)

Assets
Available-for-sale securities
Corporate debt securities	$	240.6	$	—	$	240.6	$	—
U.S. government and agency debt securities		37.9		—		37.9		—
Municipal bonds		1.0		—		1.0		—
Foreign government debt securities		7.5		—		7.5		—
Commercial paper		9.5		—		9.5		—
Certificates of deposit		129.2		—		129.2		—

Totalavailable-for-sale securities		425.7		—		425.7		—
Derivatives, current and long-term
Foreign currency forward contracts and options		6.8		—		6.8		—
Interest rate swaps		5.5		—		5.5		—

	$	438.0	$	—	$	438.0	$	—

Liabilities
Derivatives, current and long-term
Foreign currency forward contracts and options	$	61.9	$	—	$	61.9	$	—
Cross-currency interest rate swaps		3.3		—		3.3		—

	$	65.2	$	—	$	65.2	$	—


	Amount of											Amount of
	Gain/(Loss)											Gain/(Loss)
	Recognized in OCI											Reclassified from OCI
	Three Months					Six Months						Three Months					Six Months
	Ended					Ended						Ended					Ended
	June 30,					June 30,					Location on	June 30,					June 30,
Derivative Instrument	2011			2010		2011			2010		Statement of Earnings	2011			2010		2011			2010

Foreign exchange forward contracts	$	(16.0	)	$	28.3	$	(74.1	)	$	58.9	Cost of products sold	$	(12.2	)	$	8.0	$	(17.4	)	$	7.6
Foreign exchange options		2.8			—		3.7			—	Cost of products sold		—			—		—			—
Cross-currency interest rate swaps		(0.8	)		—		0.2			—	Interest expense, net		(0.5	)		—		(3.5	)		—

	$	(14.0	)	$	28.3	$	(70.2	)	$	58.9		$	(12.7	)	$	8.0	$	(20.9	)	$	7.6


	June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
	Balance			Balance
	Sheet	Fair		Sheet	Fair
	Location	Value		Location	Value

*Asset Derivatives*
Foreign exchange forward contracts	Other current assets	$	27.1	Other current assets	$32.2
Foreign exchange options	Other current assets		1.8	Other current assets	0.4
Foreign exchange forward contracts	Other assets		5.8	Other assets	11.6
Foreign exchange options	Other assets		4.6	Other assets	2.3
Interest rate swaps	Other assets		5.5	Other assets	1.5

Total asset derivatives		$	44.8		$48.0

*Liability Derivatives*
Foreign exchange forward contracts	Other current liabilities	$	66.3	Other current liabilities	$37.6
Cross-currency interest rate swaps	Other current liabilities		3.3	Other current liabilities	—
Foreign exchange forward contracts	Other long-term liabilities		28.1	Other long-term liabilities	14.4

Total liability derivatives		$	97.7		$52.0


	Three Months Ended
	June 30,							Volume/						Foreign
	2011		2010		% Inc			Mix			Price			Exchange

Americas	$	608.6	$	609.3		—	%		1	%		(1	) %		—	%
Europe		324.7		276.5		17			5			—			12
Asia Pacific		204.1		171.9		19			7			(1	)		13

Total	$	1,137.4	$	1,057.7		8			3			(1	)		6


	Three Months Ended
	June 30,				% Inc			Volume/						Foreign
	2011		2010		(Dec)			Mix			Price			Exchange

Reconstructive
Knees	$	470.9	$	452.9		4	%		1	%		(2	) %		5	%
Hips		345.0		317.1		9			4			(2	)		7
Extremities		40.7		38.2		7			5			(1	)		3

Total		856.6		808.2		6			2			(2	)		6

Dental		67.1		55.9		20			8			8			4
Trauma		69.1		57.8		20			12			2			6
Spine		56.4		57.9		(3	)		(5	)		(1	)		3
Surgical and other		88.2		77.9		13			8			—			5

Total	$	1,137.4	$	1,057.7		8			3			(1	)		6


	Three Months Ended June 30,							Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011		2010		% Inc (Dec)			2011		2010		% Inc (Dec)

Reconstructive
Knees
Americas	$	266.5	$	279.8		(5	) %	$	544.3	$	566.0		(4	) %
Europe		127.9		106.1		21			245.1		219.7		12
Asia Pacific		76.5		67.0		14			143.7		127.6		13
Hips
Americas		151.4		148.4		2			306.0		295.2		4
Europe		121.8		109.2		12			236.0		221.0		7
Asia Pacific		71.8		59.5		20			140.3		116.6		20
Extremities
Americas		31.1		29.6		5			64.3		59.2		9
Europe		6.9		6.2		10			13.7		12.7		8
Asia Pacific		2.7		2.4		14			5.6		4.7		20

Total		856.6		808.2		6			1,699.0		1,622.7		5

Dental
Americas		33.6		28.5		18			68.3		55.7		23
Europe		25.0		21.4		16			45.7		40.2		13
Asia Pacific		8.5		6.0		44			15.5		11.7		33
Trauma
Americas		35.1		31.3		12			72.1		63.9		13
Europe		15.9		11.2		43			30.0		23.0		31
Asia Pacific		18.1		15.3		19			37.1		31.3		18
Spine
Americas		37.3		41.7		(11	)		76.1		85.7		(11	)
Europe		14.4		12.6		15			28.2		25.5		11
Asia Pacific		4.7		3.6		29			9.0		6.7		34
Surgical and other
Americas		53.6		50.0		7			107.2		99.3		8
Europe		12.8		9.8		32			25.2		20.5		23
Asia Pacific		21.8		18.1		20			39.6		34.3		15

Total	$	1,137.4	$	1,057.7		8		$	2,253.0	$	2,120.5		6


					Total Number of		Approximate
					Shares Purchased		Dollar Value of
					as Part of		Shares that May
	Total Number				Publicly		Yet Be Purchased
	of Shares		Average Price		Announced Plans		Under Plans
	Purchased		Paid per Share		or Programs*		or Programs

April 2011		—	$	—		63,267,163	$	969,670,852
May 2011		1,040,000		69.16		64,307,163		897,748,742
June 2011		789,000		62.33		65,096,163		848,568,032

Total		1,829,000	$	66.21		65,096,163	$	848,568,032