UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q


þ		Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the Quarter Ended~~September 30, 2008~~March 31, 2009


o		Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number0-19969

ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware		71-0673405

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

3801 Old Greenwood Road
Fort Smith, Arkansas 72903
(479) 785-6000

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including

area code, of the registrant’s principal executive offices)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.)


Large accelerated filerþ		Accelerated filero		Non-accelerated filer o ~~(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)~~		Smaller reporting companyo


Class		Outstanding at ~~October 31, 2008~~April 30, 2009

Common Stock, $.01 par value		~~25,286,080~~25,293,279 shares

PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS


					March 31		December 31
	September 30		December 31		2009		2008
	2008		2007		(Unaudited)
	(Unaudited)				($ thousands, except share data)
	($ thousands, except share data)
ASSETS

CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	157,453	$	93,805	$	58,001	$	100,880
Short-term investment securities		73,986		79,373		130,538		117,855
Accounts receivable, less allowances (2008 – $4,087; 2007 – $3,942)		148,414		141,565
Other accounts receivable, less allowances (2008 – $1,020; 2007 – $774)		7,651		8,963
Accounts receivable, less allowances (2009 - $3,365; 2008 - $3,513)						110,880		111,452
Other accounts receivable, less allowances (2009 - $1,028; 2008 - $1,001)						6,716		6,611
Prepaid expenses		8,956		11,243		12,632		10,670
Deferred income taxes		36,602		36,585		35,409		36,079
Prepaid income taxes		1,952		3,699
Prepaid and refundable income taxes						36,621		17,661
Other		8,178		7,184		6,327		6,982

TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS		443,192		382,417		397,124		408,190

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Land and structures		234,207		231,169		237,459		235,861
Revenue equipment		523,880		509,627		494,565		514,503
Service, office and other equipment		149,483		142,635		152,120		150,524
Leasehold improvements		21,163		19,794		21,529		21,697

		928,733		903,225		905,673		922,585
Less allowances for depreciation and amortization		469,790		437,087		473,566		473,010

		458,943		466,138		432,107		449,575

OTHER ASSETS		54,337		70,803		48,132		50,636

GOODWILL		63,960		63,991		63,887		63,897


	$	1,020,432	$	983,349	$	941,250	$	972,298

ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS — continued


							March 31			December 31
	September 30			December 31			2009			2008
	2008			2007			(Unaudited)
	(Unaudited)						($ thousands, except share data)
	($ thousands, except share data)
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

CURRENT LIABILITIES
Bank overdraft and drafts payable	$	13,113		$	15,248		$	8,676		$	15,189
Accounts payable		66,596			60,341			51,231			51,646
Income taxes payable		3,540			2,414			165			758
Accrued expenses		161,876			166,631			150,455			147,540
Current portion of long-term debt		238			171			162			159

TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES		245,363			244,805			210,689			215,292

LONG-TERM DEBT, less current portion		1,498			1,400			1,423			1,457

PENSION AND POSTRETIREMENT LIABILITIES		48,476			48,859			74,616			89,472

OTHER LIABILITIES		19,428			25,093			15,939			17,314

DEFERRED INCOME TAXES		32,186			30,806			33,082			24,017

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common stock, $.01 par value, authorized 70,000,000 shares; issued 2008: 26,696,446 shares; 2007: 26,549,038 shares		267			265
Common stock, $.01 par value, authorized 70,000,000 shares; issued 2009: 26,718,027 shares; 2008: 26,702,222 shares								267			267
Additional paid-in capital		266,892			258,878			269,500			268,396
Retained earnings		486,181			457,536			449,356			471,360
Treasury stock, at cost, 1,677,932 shares		(57,770	)		(57,770	)		(57,770	)		(57,770	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(22,089	)		(26,523	)		(55,852	)		(57,507	)

TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY		673,481			632,386			605,501			624,746


	$	1,020,432		$	983,349		$	941,250		$	972,298

ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF ~~INCOME~~OPERATIONS


													Three Months Ended
	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended						March 31
	September 30						September 30						2009			2008
	2008			2007			2008			2007			(Unaudited)
	(Unaudited)												($ thousands, except share and per share data)
	($ thousands, except share and per share data)
OPERATING REVENUES	$	495,815		$	486,039		$	1,441,840		$	1,377,555		$	339,677		$	447,511

OPERATING EXPENSES AND COSTS		470,323			457,853			1,377,514			1,312,275			368,278			434,359


OPERATING INCOME		25,492			28,186			64,326			65,280
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)														(28,601	)		13,152

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
Interest and dividend income		1,492			1,477			4,759			4,023			930			1,819
Interest expense and other related financing costs		(206	)		(290	)		(881	)		(885	)		(341	)		(339	)
Other, net		(681	)		601			(1,174	)		1,575			(1,082	)		(511	)

		605			1,788			2,704			4,713			(493	)		969


INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES		26,097			29,974			67,030			69,993
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES														(29,094	)		14,121

FEDERAL AND STATE INCOME TAXES
Current provision		8,469			12,318			28,709			26,491
Deferred provision (benefit)		2,186			(1,260	)		(1,821	)		166
Current (benefit) provision														(19,408	)		5,201
Deferred provision														8,471			376

		10,655			11,058			26,888			26,657			(10,937	)		5,577


NET INCOME	$	15,442		$	18,916		$	40,142		$	43,336
NET INCOME (LOSS)													$	(18,157	)	$	8,544


EARNINGS PER SHARE
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
Basic	$	0.62		$	0.76		$	1.61		$	1.75		$	(0.73	)	$	0.34
Diluted		0.61			0.75			1.59			1.72			(0.73	)		0.34


AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING
Basic		25,013,314			24,820,079			24,956,205			24,806,290			25,038,626			24,873,651
Diluted		25,382,786			25,137,398			25,275,024			25,137,140			25,038,626			24,967,412


CASH DIVIDENDS DECLARED AND PAID PER COMMON SHARE	$	0.15		$	0.15		$	0.45		$	0.45		$	0.15		$	0.15

ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Accumulated
Additional Other
Common Stock Paid-In Retained Treasury Stock Comprehensive Total
Shares Amount Capital Earnings Shares Amount Loss Equity
(Unaudited)
($ and shares, thousands)
Balances at January 1, 2008
26,549 $ 265 $ 258,878 $ 457,536 1,678 $ (57,770 ) $ (26,523 ) $ 632,386
Net income 40,142 40,142
Change in foreign currency translation, net of tax of $77 (123 ) (123 )
Amortization of unrecognized net periodic benefit costs, net of tax of $1,600:
Net actuarial loss 2,174 2,174
Prior service costs 304 304
Net transition obligation 35 35
Pension settlement expense, net of tax of $599 941 941
Unrecognized net actuarial gain, net of tax of $702 1,103 1,103

Total comprehensive income⁽¹⁾
44,576

Issuance of common stock under share-based compensation plans 147 2 2,904 2,906
Tax effect of share-based compensation plans and other 587 �� 587
Share-based compensation expense 4,523 4,523
Dividends paid on common stock (11,497 ) (11,497 )

Balances at September 30, 2008
26,696 $ 267 $ 266,892 $ 486,181 1,678 $ (57,770 ) $ (22,089 ) $ 673,481


																Accumulated
					Additional											Other
	Common Stock				Paid-In			Retained			Treasury Stock					Comprehensive			Total
	Shares		Amount		Capital			Earnings			Shares		Amount			Loss			Equity
	(Unaudited)
	($ and shares, thousands)

Balances at January 1, 2009		26,702	$	267	$	268,396		$	471,360			1,678	$	(57,770	)	$	(57,507	)	$	624,746
Net loss									(18,157	)										(18,157	)
Change in foreign currency translation, net of tax of $33																	(51	)		(51	)
Amortization of unrecognized net periodic benefit costs, net of tax of $1,087:
Net actuarial loss																	1,609			1,609
Prior service costs																	76			76
Net transition obligation																	21			21

Total comprehensive loss⁽¹⁾																				(16,502	)

Issuance of common stock under share-based compensation plans		16		—		153														153
Tax effect of share-based compensation plans and other						(172	)													(172	)
Share-based compensation expense						1,123														1,123
Dividends paid on common stock									(3,847	)										(3,847	)

Balances at March 31, 2009		26,718	$	267	$	269,500		$	449,356			1,678	$	(57,770	)	$	(55,852	)	$	605,501


(1)		Total comprehensive income for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2008 was ~~$17.8~~$9.8 million. ~~Total comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 was $20.8 million and $48.1 million, respectively.~~

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS


							Three Months Ended
	Nine Months Ended						March 31
	September 30						2009			2008
	2008			2007			(Unaudited)
	(Unaudited)						($ thousands)
	($ thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	40,142		$	43,336
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Net income (loss)							$	(18,157	)	$	8,544
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided (used) by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		57,469			57,769			19,333			19,291
Other amortization		220			188			73			73
Pension settlement expense		1,540			1,336			—			1,093
Share-based compensation expense		4,523			3,526			1,123			1,127
Provision for losses on accounts receivable		1,210			1,064			1,008			300
Deferred income tax (benefit) provision		(1,821	)		166
Deferred income tax provision								8,471			376
Gain on sales of assets		(2,994	)		(2,745	)		(717	)		(1,873	)
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation		(657	)		(683	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Receivables		(6,842	)		(18,984	)		(583	)		(4,307	)
Prepaid expenses		2,287			2,727			(1,962	)		(2,103	)
Other assets		5,914			(1,420	)		2,895			4,671
Accounts payable, taxes payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities⁽¹⁾		2,764			6,691			(30,311	)		(1,993	)

NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES		103,755			92,971
NET CASH PROVIDED (USED) BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES								(18,827	)		25,199


INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchases of property, plant and equipment, net of capital leases⁽¹⁾		(45,425	)		(76,327	)		(1,968	)		(2,581	)
Proceeds from asset sales		14,984			7,404			2,086			10,674
Purchases of short-term investment securities		(80,386	)		(230,695	)		(44,277	)		—
Proceeds from sales of short-term investment securities		85,004			224,650			31,595			78,604
Capitalization of internally developed software and other		(4,040	)		(3,382	)		(1,243	)		(1,242	)

NET CASH USED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES		(29,863	)		(78,350	)
NET CASH PROVIDED (USED) BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES								(13,807	)		85,455


FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Payments on long-term debt		(175	)		(1,273	)		(39	)		(106	)
Net change in bank overdraft		(2,135	)		1,446			(6,513	)		(3,579	)
Payment of common stock dividends		(11,497	)		(11,360	)		(3,847	)		(3,803	)
Purchases of treasury stock		—			(4,945	)
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation		657			683
Deferred financing costs		—			(800	)
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options and other		2,906			2,685			154			—

NET CASH USED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES		(10,244	)		(13,564	)		(10,245	)		(7,488	)


NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		63,648			1,057
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS								(42,879	)		103,166
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		93,805			5,009			100,880			93,805

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD	$	157,453		$	6,066		$	58,001		$	196,971

ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE A — ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS

Arkansas Best Corporation (the “Company”) is a holding company engaged, through its subsidiaries, primarily in motor carrier ~~transportation operations.~~transportation. The Company’s principal operations are conducted through ABF Freight System, Inc. and other affiliated subsidiaries of the Company (collectively “ABF”).

Approximately ~~76%~~74% of ABF’s employees are covered under a five-year collective bargaining agreement with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (“IBT”). The agreement with the IBT, which became effective April 1, 2008, provides for compounded annual contractual wage and benefit increases of approximately 4%, subject to wage rate cost-of-living adjustments.

NOTE B — FINANCIAL STATEMENT PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) pertaining to interim financial information. Accordingly, these interim financial statements do not include all information or footnote disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements and, therefore, should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and accompanying notes included in the Company’s ~~2007~~2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K and other current filings with the Commission. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which are of a normal and recurring nature) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. ABF is impacted by seasonal fluctuations which affect tonnage and shipment levels and consequently revenues and operating results. The second and third calendar ~~quarter~~quarters of each year usually ~~has~~have the highest tonnage levels while the first quarter generally has the lowest, although other factors including the state of the U.S. and global economies may influence quarterly tonnage levels. Operating results for the interim periods presented may not necessarily be indicative of the results for the fiscal year.

Preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosed amounts of contingent liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. If the underlying estimates and assumptions upon which the financial statements are based change in future periods, actual amounts may differ from those included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

~~Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year’s financial statements to conform to the current year’s presentation.~~ The ~~statements of income~~effective tax benefit rate for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended September 30, 2007 include reclassifications to report revenue and purchased transportation expense on a gross basis for certain shipments involving third-party interline carriers and certain brokerage transactions where ABF utilizes a third-party carrier for pickup or delivery of freight but remains the primary obligor to provide servicesMarch 31, 2009 was 37.6% as compared to the ~~customer.~~effective tax provision rate of 39.5% for the same period of 2008. The ~~amounts reclassified were $6.2~~difference between the Company’s effective tax rate and the federal statutory rate primarily results from the effect of state income taxes, nondeductible expenses and alternative fuel tax credits. The federal tax benefit recorded in the first quarter of 2009 will be realized by refund of taxes paid in prior years through loss carrybacks allowed by the U.S. Internal Revenue Code.

NOTE C — SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS

Short-term investments consist of FDIC-insured certificates of deposit recorded at cost plus accrued interest totaling $130.5 million and ~~$16.9~~$117.9 million ~~for the three~~at March 31, 2009 and ~~nine months ended September 30, 2007,~~December 31, 2008, respectively. ~~There was no impact on ABF’s operating income and only a minor impact on ABF’s operating ratio as a result of this reclassification.~~

ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — continued

~~NOTE C — SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS~~

~~The following is a summary of short-term investments:~~

September 30 December 31
2008 2007
($ thousands)
Certificates of deposit, at cost plus accrued interest $ 73,986 $ —
Auction rate debt securities consisting of U.S. state and local municipal securities, at fair value — 74,373
Preferred equity securities, at fair value — 5,000

Total $ 73,986 $ 79,373

~~As of September 30, 2008, short-term investments consist of FDIC-insured certificates of deposit with maturities ranging from ninety-one days to one year.~~

NOTE D ~~— EARNINGS PER SHARE~~

~~The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:~~

Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30 September 30
2008 2007 2008 2007
($ thousands, except share and per share data)
Numerator:

Numerator for earnings per share:
Net income $ 15,442 $ 18,916 $ 40,142 $ 43,336

Denominator:

Denominator for basic earnings per share - weighted-average shares 25,013,314 24,820,079 24,956,205 24,806,290
Effect of dilutive securities:
Restricted stock awards and stock options 369,472 317,319 318,819 330,850

Denominator for diluted earnings per share — adjusted weighted-average shares and assumed conversions 25,382,786 25,137,398 25,275,024 25,137,140

NET INCOME PER SHARE

Basic
$ 0.62 $ 0.76 $ 1.61 $ 1.75

Diluted
$ 0.61 $ 0.75 $ 1.59 $ 1.72

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, outstanding stock awards of 173,424 were antidilutive and not included in the net income per diluted share calculations. For the three months ended September 30, 2008 and the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, no outstanding stock awards were antidilutive.

~~ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — continued~~

~~NOTE E — STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY~~

~~Dividends on Common Stock~~

~~On October 21, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.15 per share payable to stockholders of record as of November 4, 2008.~~

~~The following table is a summary of dividends declared during the applicable quarter:~~

2008 2007
Per Share Amount Per Share Amount
($ thousands, except per share data)
First quarter $ 0.15 $ 3,803 $ 0.15 $ 3,780
Second quarter $ 0.15 $ 3,846 $ 0.15 $ 3,790
Third quarter $ 0.15 $ 3,848 $ 0.15 $ 3,790
Fourth quarter $ 0.15 $ 3,847 $ 0.15 $ 3,805

~~Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss~~

~~Components of accumulated other comprehensive loss are as follows:~~

September 30 December 31
2008 2007
($ thousands)
Pre-tax amounts:
Foreign currency translation $ (622 ) $ (422 )
Unrecognized net periodic benefit costs (35,530 ) (42,988 )

Total $ (36,152 ) $ (43,410 )

After-tax amounts:
Foreign currency translation $ (380 ) $ (257 )
Unrecognized net periodic benefit costs (21,709 ) (26,266 )

Total $ (22,089 ) $ (26,523 )

~~The unrecognized net periodic benefit costs as of September 30, 2008 are presented in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158,~~~~Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans~~~~(“FAS 158”), and do not reflect changes in nonunion pension plan assets associated with financial market declines since December 31, 2007 (see Note G).~~

~~NOTE F — SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION~~

As of September 30, 2008, the Company had outstanding stock options granted under the 1992 Stock Option Plan, the 2000 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan and the 2002 Stock Option Plan and outstanding restricted stock and restricted stock units granted under the 2005 Ownership Incentive Plan (“the 2005 Plan”). The 1992 Stock Option Plan expired on December 31, 2001. As of September 30, 2008, the Company had not elected to treat any exercised options as Employer Stock Appreciation Rights (“SARs”) and no employee SARs had been granted. No stock options have been granted since 2004.

~~ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — continued~~

The 2005 Plan supersedes the Company’s 2000 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan and 2002 Stock Option Plan with respect to future awards and provides for the granting of 1.5 million shares, which may be awarded as incentive and nonqualified stock options, SARs, restricted stock or restricted stock units. Any outstanding stock options under the 1992, 2000 or 2002 stock option plans which are forfeited or otherwise unexercised will be included in the shares available for grant under the 2005 Plan.

~~The following table summarizes the Company’s share-based compensation expense, which has been recognized in the accompanying consolidated financial statements:~~

Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30 September 30
2008 2007 2008 2007
($ thousands, except per share data)
Share-based compensation expense (pre-tax):
Restricted stock and restricted stock units $ 1,377 $ 1,087 $ 4,099 $ 2,767
Stock options 140 249 424 759

$ 1,517 $ 1,336 $ 4,523 $ 3,526

Share-based compensation expense (net of tax):
Restricted stock and restricted stock units $ 838 $ 661 $ 2,491 $ 1,682
Stock options 122 204 371 621

$ 960 $ 865 $ 2,862 $ 2,303

Share-based compensation expense (net of tax) per diluted share:
Restricted stock and restricted stock units $ 0.03 $ 0.02 $ 0.09 $ 0.07
Stock options — 0.01 0.02 0.02

$ 0.03 $ 0.03 $ 0.11 $ 0.09

~~Restricted Stock~~

~~A summary of the Company’s restricted stock program, which consists of restricted stock and restricted stock units awarded under the 2005 Plan, is presented below:~~

Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Shares/Units Fair Value

Outstanding — January 1, 2008 491,560 $ 37.35
Granted 183,380 39.48
Vested (23,783 ) 36.20
Forfeited (18,552 ) 37.65

Outstanding — September 30, 2008 632,605 $ 38.00

The Compensation and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committees of the Company’s Board of Directors are responsible for the granting of all share-based compensation under the 2005 Plan. The Company’s policies state that the grant dates for each award shall generally be five business days following the Company’s first quarter earnings release for a given year. In accordance with these policies, on April 21, 2008, the Compensation and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committees approved an award of 183,380 restricted stock units to be granted on April 30, 2008. On that date, the closing market price of the Company’s stock was $39.48 per share.

~~ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — continued~~

~~Stock Options~~

~~A summary of the Company’s stock option program is presented below:~~

Weighted-
Average
Weighted- Remaining Intrinsic
Shares Average Contractual Value⁽¹⁾
Under Option Exercise Price Term (Years) ($ thousands)

Outstanding — January 1, 2008 722,784 $ 25.24
Granted — —
Exercised (138,040 ) 22.34
Forfeited (3,180 ) 29.10

Outstanding — September 30, 2008 581,564 $ 25.90 3.7 $ 4,529

Options outstanding at September 30, 2008 which are vested or expected to vest 579,447 $ 25.89 3.7 $ 4,519

Exercisable — September 30, 2008 534,529 $ 25.62 3.6 $ 4,313


~~(1)~~		Intrinsic value represents the fair value of the Company’s Common Stock on September 30, 2008, less the weighted-average exercise price of the stock options, multiplied by the number of shares under option.

~~ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — continued~~

~~NOTE G — PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS~~

~~Nonunion Defined Benefit Pension, Supplemental Benefit Pension and Postretirement Health Plans~~

~~The following is a summary of the components of net periodic benefit cost:~~

Three Months Ended September 30
Nonunion Defined Supplemental Postretirement
Benefit Pension Plan Benefit Pension Plan Health Plan
2008 2007 2008 2007 2008 2007
($ thousands)
Service cost $ 2,294 $ 2,499 $ 145 $ 191 $ 44 $ 46
Interest cost 2,934 2,757 259 308 292 285
Expected return on plan assets (3,429 ) (3,511 ) — — — —
Transition (asset) obligation recognition — — (15 ) (29 ) 33 34
Amortization of prior service (credit) cost (225 ) (224 ) 390 390 — —
Pension settlement expense — — 447 87 — —
Recognized net actuarial loss and other 819 1,038 174 335 165 259

Net periodic benefit cost $ 2,393 $ 2,559 $ 1,400 $ 1,282 $ 534 $ 624

Nine Months Ended September 30
Nonunion Defined Supplemental Postretirement
Benefit Pension Plan Benefit Pension Plan Health Plan
2008 2007 2008 2007 2008 2007
($ thousands)
Service cost $ 6,884 $ 7,497 $ 450 $ 607 $ 130 $ 138
Interest cost 8,800 8,272 802 953 876 855
Expected return on plan assets (10,289 ) (10,533 ) — — — —
Transition (asset) obligation recognition — — (43 ) (87 ) 101 101
Amortization of prior service (credit) cost (673 ) (672 ) 1,170 1,170 — —
Pension settlement expense — — 1,540 1,336 — —
Recognized net actuarial loss and other 2,455 3,115 610 1,113 493 776

Net periodic benefit cost $ 7,177 $ 7,679 $ 4,529 $ 5,092 $ 1,600 $ 1,870

The Company’s full-year 2008 nonunion defined benefit pension plan expense is estimated to be $9.6 million compared to $10.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. In April 2008, the Company made a voluntary tax-deductible contribution of $5.0 million to its nonunion defined benefit pension plan. The Company’s nonunion defined benefit pension plan covers substantially all noncontractual employees hired before January 1, 2006. All eligible noncontractual employees hired subsequent to December 31, 2005 participate in a defined contribution plan. As described in the 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company’s nonunion pension expense and related asset and liability balances are estimated based on a number of assumptions and using the services of a third-party actuary.

In determining the funded status of the nonunion pension plan at September 30, 2008, the Company used an expected return on plan assets of 7.6%, which was established considering the historical returns for the plan’s current investment mix and its investment advisor’s range of expected returns for the plan’s current investment mix. Considering the decline in the overall equity markets during 2008, the expected return on plan assets may not be achieved in the near term. Therefore, the pension liability recorded as of September 30, 2008, which is presented in accordance with FAS 158, does not represent the actual funded status of the plan as of that date.

~~ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — continued~~

The annual remeasurement of the plan will occur as of December 31, 2008. In accordance with FAS 158, the impact on the pension liability as a result of the difference between the expected and actual return on plan assets will be recognized as an actuarial loss at year-end in other comprehensive income, net of taxes. The Company amortizes actuarial losses of the nonunion pension plan over the average remaining service period of the plan participants, which approximates 10 years. Higher future amortization of actuarial losses, which could result from lower returns on plan assets in 2008, as well as changes in the expected future returns on plan assets may result in an increase in annual pension expense for 2009. Based upon current information, the Company is evaluating making additional contributions by December 31, 2008 of up to $20.0 million, which would not exceed the maximum tax-deductible contributions.

The Company has an unfunded supplemental benefit pension plan for the purpose of providing additional retirement benefits to certain executive officers of the Company. The Company is required to record pension settlement expense when cash payouts exceed annual service and interest costs of the related plan.

~~The following is a summary of the obligations settled and pension settlement expense related to the supplemental benefit pension plan:~~

Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30 September 30
2008 2007 2008 2007
($ thousands, except per share data)
Obligations settled $ 2,423 $ 319 $ 6,218 $ 4,028
Pension settlement expense, pre-tax $ 447 $ 87 $ 1,540 $ 1,336
Pension settlement expense per share, net of taxes $ 0.01 $ — $ 0.04 $ 0.03

The Company does not anticipate settling additional pension obligations or recording additional pension settlement expense during the remainder of 2008. During the last three months of 2007, the Company recorded pension settlement expense of $0.4 million on a pre-tax basis, or $0.01 per diluted share, net of taxes.

~~Multiemployer Plans~~

Under the provisions of the Taft-Hartley Act, retirement and health care benefits for ABF’s contractual employees are provided by a number of multiemployer plans. The trust funds for these plans are administered by trustees, an equal number of whom generally are appointed by the IBT and certain management carrier organizations or other appointing authorities for employer trustees as set forth in the fund’s trust agreements. ABF contributes to these plans monthly based generally on the time worked by its contractual employees, as specified in the collective bargaining agreement and other supporting supplemental agreements. ABF recognizes as expense the contractually required contribution for the period and recognizes as a liability any contributions due and unpaid. The Company intends to meet its obligations to the multiemployer plans under its collective bargaining agreement with the IBT.

In 2006, the Pension Protection Act (the “Act”) became law and together with related regulations established new minimum funding requirements for multiemployer pension plans. The Act mandates that multiemployer pension plans that are below certain funding levels or that have projected funding deficiencies adopt a funding improvement plan or a rehabilitation program to improve the funding levels over a defined period of time. The Act also accelerates the timing of annual funding notices and requires additional disclosures from multiemployer pension plans if such plans fall below the required funding levels.

~~ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — continued~~

ABF currently contributes to 27 multiemployer pension plans, which vary in size and in funding status. In the event of the termination of a multiemployer pension plan or if ABF were to withdraw from a multiemployer pension plan, ABF would have material liabilities for its share of the unfunded vested liabilities of each such plan. ABF has not received notification of any plan termination, and ABF does not currently intend to withdraw from these plans. Therefore, the Company believes the occurrence of events that would require recognition of liabilities for its share of unfunded vested benefits is remote.

Approximately 50% of ABF’s multiemployer pension contributions are made to the Central States Southeast and Southwest Area Pension Fund (“Central States Pension Fund”). The Company understands that the funded percentage of the Central States Pension Fund was 70% to 75% as of December 31, 2007, but that the funding percentage has likely decreased during the first nine months of 2008 due to declines in the overall equity markets. In March 2008, the Central States Pension Fund reported that it adopted a rehabilitation plan as a result of its actuarial certification for the plan year beginning January 1, 2008 which, as a result of the Act, placed the Central States Pension Fund in “critical status.”

The Company anticipates that a number of other plans in which ABF participates will have to adopt either a funding improvement plan or a rehabilitation program, depending on their current funding status as required by the Act. Based upon information currently available to it, the Company believes that the contribution rates under the new collective bargaining agreement will comply with any rehabilitation plan that may be adopted for the majority of other multiemployer pension plans in which ABF participates. If the contribution rates in the collective bargaining agreement fail to meet the requirements established by the rehabilitation or funding improvement plan required by the Act for underfunded plans, the plan’s trustees would have the ability to take a wide range of actions which may include requesting an extension of the amortization period from the IRS, obtaining changes to or waivers of the requirements used by the plan to calculate funding levels or modifying pension benefits to a level where the requirements are met. If the trustees are unable to resolve a future funding deficiency through a rehabilitation or funding improvement plan, the Act could impose additional contribution requirements on ABF in the form of a surcharge of an additional 5% to 10%. However, under ABF’s five-year collective bargaining agreement that became effective April 1, 2008, any surcharges required by the Act will be included in the contractual contribution rate and should not increase ABF’s overall contribution obligation.

The underfunded status of many plans in which ABF participates occurred over many years, and management believes that an improved funded status will also take time to be achieved. The Company believes that the trustees of these funds will take appropriate measures to fulfill their fiduciary duty to preserve the integrity of the plans utilizing a combination of several possible initiatives as they have done in the past, although the Company cannot make any assurances in this regard. While increasing employer contributions is one potential remedy to address the underfunded status, it is the Company’s understanding that ABF’s annual contribution increases are limited to negotiated contribution rates through March 2013 as provided in the current collective bargaining agreement, which also complies with the Central States Pension Fund’s rehabilitation plan. Other alternatives that may be pursued by the trustees of underfunded plans include reducing or eliminating certain “adjustable benefits” of the plan or redesigning the plan structure. Furthermore, legislative changes or action taken by governmental agencies could provide relief. Based upon publically reported events, in September 2008, the IBT requested that Congress make a number of legislative changes including a request to allow pension plans more time to make up funding shortfalls caused by recent investment losses.

~~ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — continued~~

~~NOTE H — OPERATING SEGMENT DATA~~

The Company uses the “management approach” to determine its reportable operating segments, as well as to determine the basis of reporting the operating segment information. The management approach focuses on financial information that the Company’s management uses to make decisions about operating matters. Management uses operating revenues, operating expense categories, operating ratios, operating income and key operating statistics to evaluate performance and allocate resources to the Company’s operations. ABF, which provides transportation of general commodities, represents the Company’s only reportable operating segment.

The Company eliminates intercompany transactions in consolidation. However, the information used by the Company’s management with respect to its reportable segment is before intercompany eliminations of revenues and expenses. Intercompany revenues and expenses are not significant. Further classifications of operations or revenues by geographic location are impractical and are, therefore, not provided. The Company’s foreign operations are not significant.

~~ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — continued~~

The following tables reflect reportable operating segment information for the Company, as well as a reconciliation of reportable segment information to the Company’s consolidated financial statements:

Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30 September 30
2008 2007 2008 2007
($ thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES

ABF $ 476,323 $ 468,416 $ 1,383,592 $ 1,329,424
Other revenues and eliminations 19,492 17,623 58,248 48,131

$ 495,815 $ 486,039 $ 1,441,840 $ 1,377,555

OPERATING EXPENSES AND COSTS

ABF
Salaries, wages and benefits $ 271,138 $ 277,539 $ 802,652 $ 809,203
Supplies and expenses 94,023 75,444 272,911 215,955
Operating taxes and licenses 11,880 12,328 35,779 36,048
Insurance 5,652 6,746 15,899 16,412
Communications and utilities 3,689 3,936 11,381 11,574
Depreciation and amortization 18,302 18,744 55,319 55,430
Rents and purchased transportation 45,759 44,045 124,227 118,567
Gain on sale of property and equipment (671 ) (941 ) (2,997 ) (2,741 )
Other 1,375 2,118 4,835 4,232

Total ABF operating expenses and costs 451,147 439,959 1,320,006 1,264,680

Other expenses and eliminations 19,176 17,894 57,508 47,595

$ 470,323 $ 457,853 $ 1,377,514 $ 1,312,275

OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)

ABF $ 25,176 $ 28,457 $ 63,586 $ 64,744
Other income and eliminations 316 (271 ) 740 536

$ 25,492 $ 28,186 $ 64,326 $ 65,280

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)

Interest and dividend income $ 1,492 $ 1,477 $ 4,759 $ 4,023
Interest expense and other related financing costs (206 ) (290 ) (881 ) (885 )
Other, net (681 ) 601 (1,174 ) 1,575

$ 605 $ 1,788 $ 2,704 $ 4,713

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
$ 26,097 $ 29,974 $ 67,030 $ 69,993

~~NOTE I — LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AND ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS~~

The Company is involved in various legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company maintains liability insurance against certain risks arising out of the normal course of its business, subject to certain self-insured retention limits. The Company routinely establishes and reviews the adequacy of reserves for estimated legal and environmental exposures. While management believes that amounts accrued in the accompanying consolidated financial statements are adequate, estimates of these liabilities may change as circumstances develop. Considering amounts recorded, these matters are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition, cash flows or results of operations.

~~ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — continued~~

On July 30, 2007, Farm Water Technological Services, Inc., d/b/a Water Tech, and C.B.J.T., d/b/a Agricultural Supply, on behalf of themselves and other plaintiffs, filed a putative class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California against the Company and eleven other companies engaged in the LTL trucking business. This lawsuit alleges that the carriers violated U.S. antitrust laws regarding fuel surcharges and seeks unspecified treble damages allegedly sustained by class members, along with injunctive relief, attorney’s fees and costs of litigation. After the original suit was filed, other plaintiffs filed similar cases in various courts across the country. On December 20, 2007, the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation entered an order centralizing and transferring the pending lawsuits for pretrial proceedings to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia as requested by the defendants, including the Company. The defendants have asked the Court to dismiss the case. The motion to dismiss has been fully briefed by the parties and is under consideration by the Court. The Company believes that the motion to dismiss rests on strong legal grounds but it cannot predict how the Court will rule or when the Court might issue its decision. This class action litigation is in a preliminary stage and the Company cannot predict its outcome, as the litigation process is inherently uncertain. If an adverse outcome were to occur, it could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition, cash flows and results of operations. However, the Company believes that the allegations in this litigation are without merit and intends to contest such allegations and defend itself vigorously.

The Company’s subsidiaries store fuel for use in tractors and trucks in 71 underground tanks located in 23 states. Maintenance of such tanks is regulated at the federal and, in some cases, state levels. The Company believes that it is in substantial compliance with these regulations. The Company’s underground storage tanks are required to have leak-detection systems. The Company is not aware of any leaks from such tanks that could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

The Company has received notices from the Environmental Protection Agency and others that it has been identified as a potentially responsible party under the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act, or other federal or state environmental statutes, at several hazardous waste sites. After investigating the Company’s or its subsidiaries’ involvement in waste disposal or waste generation at such sites, the Company has either agreed to de minimus settlements (aggregating approximately $103,000 over the last 10 years, primarily at seven sites) or believes its obligations, other than those specifically accrued for with respect to such sites, would involve immaterial monetary liability, although there can be no assurances in this regard.

At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company’s reserve for estimated environmental clean-up costs of properties currently or previously operated by the Company totaled $1.1 million, which is included in accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Amounts accrued reflect management’s best estimate of the future undiscounted exposure related to identified properties based on current environmental regulations. The Company’s estimate is based on management’s experience with similar environmental matters and on testing performed at certain sites.

~~NOTE J~~ — FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

~~In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued~~ Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157,Fair Value Measurements(“FAS 157”)~~. This statement clarifies the definition of~~, defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands the disclosures on fair value measurements. ~~In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FAS 157-2,~~~~Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157~~(“FSP 157-2”), which provides a one-year deferral of the effective date of FAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed in the financial statements at fair value at least annually.

~~ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — continued~~

Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the provisions of FAS 157 with respect to its financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value within the financial statements on a recurring basis. The partial adoption of FAS 157 for financial assets and liabilities did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company does not expect the application of FAS 157 to its nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements when that portion of the statement becomes effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2009.

FAS 157 specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s market assumptions. The fair value hierarchy specified by FAS 157 is as follows:

	•		Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.

	•		Level 2 — Quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

	•		Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

~~On October 10, 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FAS 157-3,~~~~Determining the~~Assets Measured at Fair Value ofon a ~~Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not Active~~(“FSP 157-3”), which clarifies the application of FAS 157 in cases where a market is not active. FSP 157-3 was effective upon issuance, including prior periods for which financial statements have not been issued. The adoption of FSP 157-3 did not have an effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements or disclosures at September 30, 2008.

~~ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — continued~~Recurring Basis

The following table presents, for each of the fair value hierarchy levels, the Company’s assets ~~and liabilities at September 30, 2008~~ that are measured at fair value on a recurring ~~basis:~~basis at March 31, 2009:

Fair Value Measurements Using
Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
($ thousands)
Assets

Money market funds (U.S. treasury and other government securities)⁽¹⁾
$ 149,127 $ 149,127 $ — $ —
Available for sale security⁽²⁾
719 — 719 —
Equity, bond and money market mutual funds held in trust related to a nonqualified deferred compensation plan⁽³⁾
9,179 9,179 — —

Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis $ 159,025 $ 158,306 $ 719 $ —

Liabilities

Nonqualified deferred compensation plan liabilities⁽⁴⁾
$ 9,179 $ 9,179 $ — $ —


			Fair Value Measurements Using
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	($ thousands)
Money market funds (U.S. government obligations including U.S. Treasury securities)⁽¹⁾	$	52,119	$	52,119	$	—	$	—
Available for sale security⁽²⁾		598		—		598		—
Equity, bond and money market mutual funds held in trust related to a nonqualified deferred compensation plan⁽³⁾		6,176		6,176		—		—


	$	58,893	$	58,295	$	598	$	—


(1)		Included in cash and cash equivalents in the consolidated balance sheet. Quoted market prices were used to determine fair values.

(2)		Consists of an insured, investment-grade auction rate debt security which is included in other long-term assets in the consolidated balance sheet.

(3)		Represents assets related to the deferral of compensation, the Company’s match and investment earnings related to the Company’s Voluntary Savings Plan. These securities, which are considered general assets of the Company until distributed to the participant, ~~and~~ are included in other long-term assets in the consolidated balance sheet. A corresponding liability is included in other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet. Quoted market prices were used to determine fair values of the investments, which consist of U.S. and international equity mutual funds, government and corporate bond mutual funds and money market funds, held in a trust with a third-party brokerage firm.

ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — continued

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

The Company also has assets that under certain conditions are subject to measurement at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. The following table presents assets that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis for the three months ended March 31, 2009:


			Fair Value Measurements Using
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
			($ thousands)

Assets held for sale⁽¹⁾	$	2,551	$	—	$	2,551	$	—


~~(4)~~(1)		~~Represents liabilities to participants under the Company’s Voluntary Savings Plan. These liabilities~~Assets held for sale are included in other ~~long-term liabilities~~noncurrent assets in the consolidated balance ~~sheet. The~~sheet at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144,Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. Assets held for sale primarily represent ABF’s older revenue equipment. Quoted prices for similar assets in active markets were used to determine fair values. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, assets held for sale with a carrying amount of $0.7 million were written down to their fair value of ~~nonqualified deferred compensation plan liabilities equals the fair value~~$0.4 million, resulting in a loss of $0.3 million which was reported in operating loss. In certain cases, carrying amounts of assets held ~~in trust~~ for ~~the plan, as such assets are intended to satisfy the plan liabilities.~~sale may be lower than current fair values.

NOTE E — PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS

Nonunion Defined Benefit Pension, Supplemental Benefit Pension and Postretirement Health Plans

The following is a summary of the components of net periodic benefit cost:


	Three Months Ended March 31
	Nonunion Defined						Supplemental					Postretirement
	Benefit Pension Plan						Benefit Pension Plan					Health Plan
	2009			2008			2009		2008			2009		2008
	($ thousands)

Service cost	$	2,271		$	2,295		$	153	$	156		$	42	$	43
Interest cost		3,090			2,933			276		288			278		292
Expected return on plan assets		(2,359	)		(3,430	)		—		—			—		—
Transition (asset) obligation recognition		—			—			—		(11	)		34		34
Amortization of prior service cost (credit)		(224	)		(224	)		349		390			—		—
Pension settlement expense		—			—			—		1,093			—		—
Recognized net actuarial loss and other		2,360			818			132		233			142		164

Net periodic benefit cost	$	5,138		$	2,392		$	910	$	2,149		$	496	$	533

The Company’s full-year 2009 nonunion defined benefit pension plan expense is estimated to be $20.6 million compared to $9.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. In March 2009, the Company made voluntary tax-deductible contributions totaling $15.5 million to its nonunion defined benefit pension plan. The Company may make additional contributions to the nonunion pension plan in 2009 of up to $10.0 million, which would not exceed the maximum tax-deductible contribution. The Company’s nonunion defined benefit pension plan covers substantially all noncontractual employees hired before January 1, 2006. All eligible noncontractual employees hired subsequent to December 31, 2005 participate in a defined contribution plan.

ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — continued

months ended March 31, 2008, the Company settled obligations of $3.8 million and recorded pension settlement expense of $1.1 million on a pre-tax basis, or $0.03 per share, net of taxes. During the last nine months of 2009, the Company anticipates settling obligations of $3.0 million and recording pension settlement expense of approximately $0.5 million on a pre-tax basis, or $0.01 per diluted share, net of taxes. The final settlement expense is dependent upon the pension actuarial valuation, which is based on the applicable discount rate determined at the settlement date. During the last nine months of 2008, the Company recorded pension settlement expense of $0.4 million on a pre-tax basis, or $0.01 per diluted share, net of taxes.

Multiemployer Plans

Under the provisions of the Taft-Hartley Act, retirement and health care benefits for ABF’s contractual employees are provided by a number of multiemployer plans. ABF contributes to these plans monthly based generally on the time worked by its contractual employees, as specified in ABF’s five-year collective bargaining agreement that became effective on April 1, 2008 and other supporting supplemental agreements. ABF recognizes as expense the contractually required contribution for the period and recognizes as a liability any contributions due and unpaid.

ABF currently contributes to 26 multiemployer pension plans, which vary in size and in funding status. In the event of the termination of a multiemployer pension plan or if ABF were to withdraw from a multiemployer pension plan, ABF would have material liabilities for its share of the unfunded vested liabilities of each such plan. ABF has not received notification of any plan termination, and ABF does not currently intend to withdraw from these plans. Therefore, the Company believes the occurrence of events that would require recognition of liabilities for its share of unfunded vested benefits is remote.

There have been no significant changes in information available to the Company related to multiemployer plans as disclosed in the Company’s 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

NOTE F — STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Dividends on Common Stock

On April 21, 2009, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.15 per share payable to stockholders of record as of May 5, 2009.

The following table is a summary of dividends declared during the applicable quarter:


	2009				2008
	Per Share		Amount		Per Share		Amount
	($ thousands, except per share data)

First quarter	$	0.15	$	3,847	$	0.15	$	3,803
Second quarter (2009 amount estimated)	$	0.15	$	3,893	$	0.15	$	3,846

ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — continued

Stock Awards

As of March 31, 2009, the Company had outstanding stock options granted under the 1992 Stock Option Plan, the 2000 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan and the 2002 Stock Option Plan and outstanding restricted stock and restricted stock units granted under the 2005 Ownership Incentive Plan (“the 2005 Plan”). The 1992 Stock Option Plan expired on December 31, 2001. As of March 31, 2009, the Company had not elected to treat any exercised options as Employer Stock Appreciation Rights (“SARs”) and no employee SARs had been granted. No stock options have been granted since 2004.

Restricted Stock

A summary of the Company’s restricted stock program, which consists of restricted stock and restricted stock units awarded under the 2005 Plan, is presented below:


				Weighted-Average
				Grant Date
	Shares/Units			Fair Value


Outstanding - January 1, 2009		627,522		$	38.03
Granted		—			—
Vested		(9,970	)		36.23
Forfeited		(9,598	)		38.53

Outstanding - March 31, 2009		607,954		$	38.05

The Compensation and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committees of the Company’s Board of Directors are responsible for the granting of all share-based compensation under the 2005 Plan. The Company’s policies state that the grant dates for each award shall generally be five business days following the Company’s first quarter earnings release for a given year. In accordance with these policies, on April 20, 2009, the Compensation and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committees approved an award of 306,730 restricted stock units to be granted on April 29, 2009. On that date, the closing market price of the Company’s stock was $22.55 per share.

ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — continued

Stock Options

A summary of the Company’s stock option program is presented below:


						Weighted-
						Average
				Weighted-		Remaining		Intrinsic
	Shares			Average		Contractual		Value⁽¹⁾
	Under Option			Exercise Price		Term (*Years*)		*($ thousands)*


Outstanding - January 1, 2009		576,364		$	26.02
Granted		—			—
Exercised		(9,000	)		17.00
Forfeited		(9,900	)		28.68

Outstanding - March 31, 2009		557,464		$	26.12


Options outstanding at March 31, 2009 which are vested or expected to vest		557,464		$	26.12		3.3	$	152


Exercisable - March 31, 2009		557,464		$	26.12		3.3	$	152


(1)		The intrinsic value for each option represents the excess, if any, of the market value of the Company’s Common Stock on March 31, 2009 over the exercise price of the option.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

Components of accumulated other comprehensive loss are as follows:


	March 31			December 31
	2009			2008
	($ thousands)
Pre-tax amounts:
Foreign currency translation	$	(1,106	)	$	(1,022	)
Unrecognized net periodic benefit costs		(90,304	)		(93,097	)

Total	$	(91,410	)	$	(94,119	)


After-tax amounts:
Foreign currency translation	$	(676	)	$	(625	)
Unrecognized net periodic benefit costs		(55,176	)		(56,882	)

Total	$	(55,852	)	$	(57,507	)

NOTE G — EARNINGS PER SHARE

Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted FASB Staff Position No. EITF 03-6-1,Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities(“FSP EITF 03-6-1”). FSP EITF 03-6-1 established that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities. The Company’s unvested restricted stock and restricted stock units are paid nonforfeitable dividends or dividend equivalents at the same rate and at the same time as the dividends paid on outstanding shares of Common Stock and are therefore considered participating securities. In accordance with FSP EITF 03-6-1, the Company’s calculation of earnings per share allocates

ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — continued

dividends paid and a portion of unallocated net income, but not losses, to unvested restricted stock and restricted stock units. The adoption of FSP EITF 03-6-1, which also requires retrospective adjustment of earnings per share for prior-periods, did not have an effect on earnings per share for the periods presented.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:


	Three Months Ended
	March 31
	2009			2008
	($ thousands, except share and per share data)
Basic earnings per share
Numerator:
Net income (loss)	$	(18,157	)	$	8,544
Effect of unvested restricted stock awards		(82	)		(148	)

Adjusted net income (loss)	$	(18,239	)	$	8,396


Denominator:
Weighted-average shares		25,038,626			24,873,651


Net income (loss) per share	$	(0.73	)	$	0.34


Diluted earnings per share
Numerator:
Net income (loss)	$	(18,157	)	$	8,544
Effect of unvested restricted stock awards		(82	)		(148	)

Adjusted net income (loss)	$	(18,239	)	$	8,396


Denominator:
Weighted-average shares		25,038,626			24,873,651
Effect of dilutive securities		—			93,761

Adjusted weighted-average shares and assumed conversions		25,038,626			24,967,412


Net income (loss) per share	$	(0.73	)	$	0.34

For the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, outstanding stock awards of 692,396 and 506,801, respectively, were not included in the per diluted share calculations because their inclusion would have the effect of decreasing the loss per share in the first quarter of 2009 and increasing the earnings per share in the first quarter of 2008.

NOTE H — OPERATING SEGMENT DATA

ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — continued

The Company eliminates intercompany transactions in consolidation. However, the information used by the Company’s management with respect to its reportable segment is before intersegment eliminations of revenues and expenses. Intersegment revenues and expenses are not significant. Further classifications of operations or revenues by geographic location are impractical and are, therefore, not provided. The Company’s foreign operations are not significant.


	Three Months Ended
	March 31
	2009			2008
	($ thousands)
OPERATING REVENUES
ABF	$	323,113		$	427,747
Other revenues and eliminations		16,564			19,764

	$	339,677		$	447,511


OPERATING EXPENSES AND COSTS
ABF
Salaries, wages and benefits	$	233,497		$	257,723
Fuel, supplies and expenses		50,528			81,858
Operating taxes and licenses		10,514			11,939
Insurance		3,503			4,833
Communications and utilities		3,971			4,009
Depreciation and amortization		18,610			18,556
Rents and purchased transportation		27,886			36,021
Gain on sale of property and equipment		(717	)		(1,874	)
Other		2,164			1,802

Total ABF operating expenses and costs		349,956			414,867


Other expenses and eliminations		18,322			19,492

	$	368,278		$	434,359


OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)
ABF	$	(26,843	)	$	12,880
Other income (loss) and eliminations		(1,758	)		272

	$	(28,601	)	$	13,152


OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
Interest and dividend income	$	930		$	1,819
Interest expense and other related financing costs		(341	)		(339	)
Other, net		(1,082	)		(511	)

	$	(493	)	$	969


INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES	$	(29,094	)	$	14,121

ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) — continued

NOTE I — LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AND ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS

The Company is involved in various legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company maintains liability insurance against certain risks arising out of the normal course of its business, subject to certain self-insured retention limits. The Company routinely establishes and reviews the adequacy of reserves for estimated legal and environmental exposures. While management believes that amounts accrued in the accompanying consolidated financial statements are adequate, estimates of these liabilities may change as circumstances develop. Considering amounts recorded, these matters are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, cash flows or results of operations.

On July 30, 2007, Farm Water Technological Services, Inc., d/b/a Water Tech, and C.B.J.T., d/b/a Agricultural Supply, on behalf of themselves and other plaintiffs, filed a putative class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California against the Company and eleven other companies engaged in the less-than-truckload transportation business. This lawsuit alleged that the carriers violated U.S. antitrust laws regarding fuel surcharges and sought unspecified treble damages allegedly sustained by class members, along with injunctive relief, attorney’s fees and costs of litigation. After the original suit was filed, other plaintiffs filed similar cases in various courts across the country. On December 20, 2007, the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation entered an order centralizing and transferring the pending lawsuits for pretrial proceedings to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (the “Court”) as requested by the defendants, including the Company. On January 28, 2009, the Court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the case, ruling that the plaintiffs’ complaint did not allege sufficient facts to properly state a claim upon which relief could be granted under the legal standards applicable to antitrust conspiracy claims. The Court allowed the plaintiffs until March 16, 2009 to move to amend their complaint in order to add additional detailed allegations. The plaintiffs failed to amend their complaint and the dismissal has become final.

The Company’s subsidiaries store fuel for use in tractors and trucks in 71 underground tanks located in 23 states. Maintenance of such tanks is regulated at the federal and, in some cases, state levels. The Company believes that it is in substantial compliance with all such regulations. The Company’s underground storage tanks are required to have leak detection systems. The Company is not aware of any leaks from such tanks that could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

The Company has received notices from the Environmental Protection Agency and others that it has been identified as a potentially responsible party under the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act, or other federal or state environmental statutes, at several hazardous waste sites. After investigating the Company’s or its subsidiaries’ involvement in waste disposal or waste generation at such sites, the Company has either agreed to de minimis settlements (aggregating approximately $103,000 over the last ten years, primarily at seven sites) or believes its obligations, other than those specifically accrued for with respect to such sites, would involve immaterial monetary liability, although there can be no assurances in this regard.

At March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company’s reserve for estimated environmental clean-up costs of properties currently or previously operated by the Company totaled $1.1 million, which is included in accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Amounts accrued reflect management’s best estimate of the future undiscounted exposure related to identified properties based on current environmental regulations. The Company’s estimate is based on management’s experience with similar environmental matters and on testing performed at certain sites.

~~ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION~~
~~AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS~~


ITEM 2.		MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

General

Arkansas Best Corporation (the “Company”), a Delaware corporation, is a holding company engaged through its subsidiaries primarily in motor carrier ~~transportation operations.~~freight transportation. The Company’s principal operations are conducted through ABF Freight System, Inc. and other affiliated subsidiaries of the Company (collectively “ABF”).

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations describes the principal factors affecting critical accounting policies, liquidity and capital resources, and results of operations of the Company. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the accompanying quarterly unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2007.~~2008. The Company’s ~~2007~~2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K includes additional information about significant accounting policies, practices and the transactions that underlie the Company’s financial results, as well as a detailed discussion of the most significant risks and uncertainties to which its financial and operating results are subject. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Critical Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Impacting the Company

The Company’s accounting policies that are “critical,” or the most important, to understand the Company’s financial condition and results of operations and that require management of the Company to make the most difficult judgments are described in the Company’s ~~2007~~2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K. There have been no material changes in these critical accounting policies during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2008.~~March 31, 2009.

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157,Fair Value Measurements(“FAS 157”). This statement ~~clarifies the definition of~~defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands the disclosures on fair value measurements. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FAS 157-2,Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157(“FSP 157-2”), which provides a one-year deferral of the effective date of FAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and ~~nonfinancial~~ liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed in the financial statements at fair value at least annually. In accordance with FSP 157-2, the Company adopted the provisions of FAS 157 with respect to its ~~financial~~ assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value within the financial statements on a recurring basis effective January 1, 2008 ~~(see Note J~~and adopted the provisions of FAS 157 with respect to its nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value within the ~~Company’s accompanying consolidated~~ financial ~~statements).~~statements on a nonrecurring basis as of January 1, 2009. The ~~partial~~ adoption of FAS 157 ~~for financial assets and liabilities~~ did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial ~~statements. The Company does not expect~~statements (see Note D to the ~~application of FAS 157 to its nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities to have a material effect on its~~accompanying consolidated financial ~~statements when that portion of the statement becomes effective for~~statements).

Effective January 1, 2009, the Company ~~beginning January 1, 2009.~~

~~On October 10, 2008, the FASB issued~~adopted FASB Staff Position ~~FAS 157-3,~~No. EITF 03-6-1,Determining ~~the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not Active~~Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities(“FSP ~~157-3”~~EITF 03-6-1”)~~, which clarifies~~. FSP EITF 03-6-1 established that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities. The Company’s unvested restricted stock and restricted stock units are paid nonforfeitable dividends or dividend equivalents at the ~~application~~same rate and at the same time as the dividends paid on outstanding shares of ~~FAS 157 in cases where~~Common Stock and are therefore considered participating securities. In accordance with FSP EITF 03-6-1, the Company’s calculation of earnings per share allocates dividends paid and a ~~market is~~portion of unallocated net income, but not ~~active. FSP 157-3 was effective upon issuance, including prior periods for which financial statements have not been issued.~~losses, to unvested restricted stock and restricted stock units. The adoption of FSP ~~157-3~~EITF 03-6-1, which also requires retrospective adjustment of earnings per


ITEM 2.		MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — continued

share for prior-periods, did not have an effect on earnings per share for the ~~Company’s~~periods presented (see Note G to the accompanying consolidated financial ~~statements or disclosures at September 30, 2008.~~

~~ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION~~
~~AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — continued~~statements).

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company’s primary sources of liquidity are cash and short-term investments on-hand, cash generated by operations and borrowing capacity under its revolving Credit Agreement.

Cash Flow and Short-Term Investments:Components of cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments are as follows:

September 30 December 31
2008 2007
($thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents, primarily money market funds (U.S. treasury and other government securities) $ 157,453 $ 93,805
Short-term investments:
Certificates of deposit 73,986 —
Auction rate debt and preferred equity securities — 79,373

Total $ 231,439 $ 173,178


	March 31		December 31
	2009		2008
	($ thousands)

Cash and cash equivalents, primarily money market funds (U.S. government obligations including U.S. Treasury securities)	$	58,001	$	100,880
Short-term investments (FDIC-insured certificates of deposit)		130,538		117,855

Total	$	188,539	$	218,735

During the three months ended March 31, 2009, cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments declined $30.2 million, reflecting cash used by operating activities totaling $18.8 million, repayment of bank overdrafts of $6.5 million and payment of dividends on Common Stock of $3.8 million. Cash used by operating activities includes contributions of $15.5 million to the nonunion pension plan during the first quarter of 2008, the Company transitioned out of its short-term investments in auction rate debt and preferred equity securities, resulting in the sale of $78.6 million of short-term investments with no realized gains or losses. As of September 30, 2008, short-term investments consist of FDIC-insured certificates of deposit with maturities ranging from ninety-one days to one year.2009.

During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2008, cash provided from operations of ~~$103.8~~$25.2 million and proceeds from asset sales of ~~$15.0~~$10.7 million were used to purchase ~~revenue equipment (tractors and trailers used primarily in ABF’s operations) and other~~ property and equipment totaling ~~$45.4~~$2.6 million, reduce bank overdrafts by $3.6 million and pay dividends on Common Stock of ~~$11.5~~$3.8 million.

~~During~~ The decrease in operating cash flow in the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2007, cash provided from operations~~first quarter of ~~$93.0 million and proceeds from asset sales~~2009 as compared to the first quarter of ~~$7.4 million were~~2008 primarily used to purchase revenue equipment (tractors and trailers used primarily in ABF’s operations) and other property and equipment totaling $76.3 million, make payments on long-term debt of $1.3 million, purchase 125,000 sharesreflects the effect of the ~~Company’s Common Stock for $4.9 million~~weaker freight tonnage environment on ABF’s operating results and ~~pay dividends on Common Stock of $11.4 million.~~the 2009 contributions to the nonunion pension plan.

Credit Agreement:The Company has a revolving credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with a syndicate of financial institutions. The Credit Agreement, which has a maturity date of May 4, 2012, provides for up to $325.0 million of revolving credit loans (including a $150.0 million sublimit for letters of credit). Borrowing capacity under the revolving Credit Agreement is presented below:

September 30 December 31
2008 2007
($thousands)
Revolving credit limit $ 325,000 $ 325,000
Outstanding revolver advances — —
Letters of credit (51,803 ) (53,557 )

Borrowing capacity $ 273,197 $ 271,443

~~ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION~~
~~AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — continued~~


	March 31			December 31
	2009			2008
	($ thousands)

Revolving credit limit	$	325,000		$	325,000
Outstanding revolver advances		—			—
Letters of credit		(51,478	)		(50,918	)

Borrowing capacity	$	273,522		$	274,082

The Credit Agreement allows the Company to request extensions of the maturity date for a period not to exceed two years, subject to approval of a majority of the participating financial institutions. The Credit Agreement also allows the Company to request an increase in the amount of revolving credit loans of up to $200.0 million to an aggregate amount of $525.0 million, to the extent commitments are received from participating lenders.


ITEM 2.		MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — continued

Interest rates under the agreement are at variable rates as defined by the Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreement contains a pricing grid, based on the Company’s senior debt ratings, that determines its Eurodollar margin, facility fees, utilization fees and letter of credit fees. The Company has a senior unsecured debt rating of BBB+ with a stable outlook by Standard & Poor’s Rating Service and a senior unsecured debt rating of Baa2 with a stable outlook by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. The Credit Agreement requires the payment of a utilization fee if the borrowings under the Credit Agreement exceed 50% of the facility amount. The Credit Agreement contains various customary covenants which limit, among other things, indebtedness and dispositions of assets and which require the Company to maintain compliance with certain quarterly financial ratios. As of ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, the Company was in compliance with the covenants.

Contractual Obligations:The following table provides the aggregate annual contractual obligations of the Company including capital and operating lease obligations, purchase obligations and near-term estimated benefit plan distributions as of ~~September 30, 2008:~~March 31, 2009:


	Payments Due by Period										Payments Due by Period
	($thousands)										($ thousands)
			Less Than		1-3		3-5		More Than				Less Than		1-3		3-5		More Than
Contractual Obligations	Total		1 Year		Years		Years		5 Years		Total		1 Year		Years		Years		5 Years


Capital lease obligations, including interest	$	2,209	$	335	$	503	$	479	$	892	$	2,008	$	250	$	508	$	450	$	800
Operating lease obligations⁽¹⁾		42,553		12,514		16,857		8,478		4,704		37,915		11,207		15,843		7,025		3,840
Purchase obligations⁽²⁾		10,899		10,899								43,316		43,316		—		—		—
Voluntary savings plan distributions⁽³⁾		1,041		1,041								2,091		2,091		—		—		—
Postretirement health distributions⁽⁴⁾		725		725
Postretirement health expenditures⁽⁴⁾												825		825		—		—		—
Deferred salary distributions⁽⁵⁾		1,148		1,148								1,144		1,144		—		—		—
Supplemental pension distributions⁽⁶⁾		—		—								2,971		2,971		—		—		—

Total	$	58,575	$	26,662	$	17,360	$	8,957	$	5,596	$	90,270	$	61,804	$	16,351	$	7,475	$	4,640


(1)		While the Company owns the majority of its larger terminals and distribution centers, certain facilities and equipment are leased. As of ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, the Company had future minimum rental commitments, net of noncancelable subleases, totaling ~~$41.3~~$37.5 million for terminal facilities and ~~$1.3~~$0.4 million for other equipment. The future minimum rental commitments are presented exclusive of executory costs such as insurance, maintenance and taxes. In addition, the Company has provided lease guarantees through March 2012 totaling ~~$0.9~~$0.7 million related to Clipper, a former subsidiary of the Company.

(2)		Purchase obligations relating to revenue equipment, other equipment and property are cancelable if certain conditions are met. These commitments are included in the Company’s ~~2008~~2009 annual net capital expenditure plan, which is estimated to be approximately ~~$45~~$45.0 million to ~~$55~~$50.0 million. Due to the freight environment and timing of certain real estate opportunities, this revised expenditure plan is lower than the $60 million to $70 million range estimated at the beginning of the year.

(3)		Represents elective distributions anticipated within the next twelve months under the Voluntary Savings Plan, a nonqualified deferred compensation plan. Future distributions are subject to change for retirement, death or disability of current employees. As a result, estimates of distributions beyond one year cannot be made with a reasonable level of accuracy and are not presented.

~~ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION~~
~~AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — continued~~





(4)		Represents distributions projected over the next twelve months related to postretirement health benefits. Future distributions are subject to change based upon increases and other changes in premiums and medical costs and continuation of the plan for current participants. As a result, estimates of distributions beyond one year are not presented. ~~Postretirement health plan liabilities accrued in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet totaled $19.9 million as of September 30, 2008.~~


ITEM 2.		MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — continued


(5)		Represents deferred salary agreement distributions projected over the next twelve months. Future distributions are subject to change based upon assumptions for projected salaries and retirements, deaths, disability or early retirement of current employees. As a result, estimates of distributions beyond one year cannot be made with a reasonable level of accuracy and are not presented. ~~Deferred salary liabilities accrued in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet totaled $8.8 million as of September 30, 2008.~~

(6)		~~The Company does not anticipate any~~Represents distributions within the next twelve months under the unfunded supplemental pension benefit plan. The amounts and dates of distributions in future periods are dependent upon actual retirement dates of eligible officers and other events and factors, including assumptions involved in distribution calculations such as the discount rate, years of service and future salary changes. As a result, estimates of distributions beyond one year cannot be made with a reasonable level of accuracy and are not presented. ~~Supplemental pension benefit plan liabilities accrued in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet totaled $17.4 million as of September 30, 2008.~~

The Company ~~does not have required minimum~~made voluntary tax-deductible contributions totaling $15.5 million to its ~~qualified~~ nonunion pension plan in 2008, but made a voluntary tax-deductible contribution of $5.0 million in April 2008. The Pension Protection Act of 2006 did not have a material impact on the future required contributions to the Company’s nonunion defined benefit pension plan as of the last actuarial valuation on January 1, 2008.March 2009. Based upon current information, the Company is evaluating making additional contributions ~~by December 31, 2008~~in 2009 of up to ~~$20.0~~$10.0 million, which would not exceed the maximum tax-deductible ~~contributions~~contribution (see Note GE to the ~~Company’s~~accompanying consolidated financial statements).

ABF contributes to multiemployer health, welfare and pension plans based generally on the time worked by its contractual employees, as specified in the collective bargaining agreement and other supporting supplemental agreements (see Note GE to the ~~Company’s~~accompanying consolidated financial statements).

Other Liquidity Information:Management believes cash generated by operations, cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and amounts available under the existing Credit Agreement will be sufficient for the foreseeable future to finance the Company’s lease commitments; letter of credit commitments; quarterly dividends; stock repurchases; nonunion benefit plan contributions; unfunded supplemental pension benefits; capital expenditures; health, welfare and pension contributions under collective bargaining agreements; and other expenditures. The recent disruption in the credit markets has had a significant adverse impact on a number of financial institutions. At this point in time, the Company’s liquidity has not been significantly impacted by the current credit ~~environment, and due, in part, to the Credit Agreement maturing in May 2012, management~~environment. Management does not expect that liquidity will be materially impacted in the near ~~future.~~future due, in part, to the existing Credit Agreement which does not mature until May 2012.

The Company expects to continue to pay quarterly dividends in the foreseeable future, although there can be no assurances in this regard since future dividends are dependent upon future earnings, capital requirements, the Company’s financial condition and other factors.

~~ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION~~
~~AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — continued~~

Financial Instruments:The Company has not historically entered into financial instruments for ~~speculative~~trading purposes, nor has the Company historically engaged in a program for hedging fuel prices. No such instruments were outstanding ~~during the nine months ended September 30, 2008~~as of March 31, 2009 or ~~in 2007.~~2008.

Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements:The Company’s off-balance-sheet arrangements include future minimum rental commitments, net of noncancelable subleases, of ~~$42.6~~$37.9 million under operating lease agreements. The Company has no investments, loans or any other known contractual arrangements with affiliated special-purpose entities, variable interest entities or financial partnerships.

2520

~~ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION~~


ITEM 2.		MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — continued

Results of Operations

Executive Overview

Arkansas Best Corporation ~~(the “Company”)~~ is a holding company engaged through its subsidiaries primarily in motor carrier ~~transportation operations.~~freight transportation. The Company’s principal operations are conducted through ABF Freight System, Inc. and other affiliated subsidiaries of the Company (collectively “ABF”). ABF represented ~~96%~~95% of the Company’s consolidated revenues for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2008.~~March 31, 2009.

On an ongoing basis, ABF’s ability to operate profitably and generate cash is impacted by tonnage (gross weight hauled), which influences operating leverage as tonnage levels vary; the pricing environment; customer account mix; and the ability to manage costs effectively, primarily in the area of salaries, wages and benefits (“labor”).

For the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company reported a consolidated net loss of $18.2 million after taxes, primarily reflecting the operating results of ABF. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, ABF’s revenues decreased 23.3% on a per-day basis compared to the same period in 2008. This revenue decline primarily reflects decreases in tonnage levels and changes in revenue per hundredweight, including fuel surcharges. ABF’s first quarter 2009 operating ratio increased to 108.3% from 97.0% in the first quarter of 2008. The ABF operating results are more fully discussed in the ABF section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

ABF’s operations are affected by general economic conditions, as well as a number of other competitive factors that are more fully described in the General Development of Business and Risk Factors sections of the Company’s ~~2007~~2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The instability in the global financial and credit markets combined with its influence on business and consumer confidence levels has contributed to an unfavorable economic environment. ~~A prolonged~~The economic downturn ~~could~~has adversely ~~impact~~impacted our customers’ ~~access to adequate financial resources and, consequently, the levels of~~ business activities ~~in the industries in~~ which ~~we operate. This could have~~has had a corresponding adverse effect on ABF’s tonnage levels and ~~potentially limit~~limited ABF’s ability to secure adequate pricing for its services. ~~ABF is generally effective~~ABF’s first quarter 2009 operating results were impacted by a 15.7% year-over-year decline in ~~managing its costs to business levels. However, further~~tonnage per day, which was preceded by year-over-year declines in tonnage ~~levels could impact ABF’s ability to correspondingly adjust its cost structure throughout the ABF system and have a significant adverse effect on its operating results.~~

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, ABF’s revenues increased 0.1% and 3.5%, respectively, on a per-day basis compared to the same periods in 2007. The revenue improvement primarily reflects an increase in revenue per hundredweight influenced by higher fuel surcharge, partially offset by decreases in tonnage levels. Tonnage per day ~~for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 decreased by~~of 5.1% and ~~1.8%, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2007.~~

~~ABF’s third quarter 2008 operating ratio increased to 94.7% from 93.9%~~11.5% in the third ~~quarter~~and fourth quarters of ~~2007. During the nine months ended September 30,~~ 2008, ABF’s operating ratio increased slightly to 95.4% from 95.1% in the same period of 2007. The ABF operating ratio is more fully discussed below in the ABF section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

ABF has experienced significant fluctuations in year-over-year tonnage levels in recent years. Through the first nine months of 2007, tonnage per day declined 6.2% below the same period in 2006. Although business levels remained depressed, year-over-year tonnage levels stabilized somewhat from the third quarter 2007 through the first half of 2008. However, ABF’s year-over-year monthly tonnage levels declined at an increasing rate each month of third quarter 2008, resulting in a 5.1% decrease in total third quarter tonnage per day.respectively. ABF’s management believes that recent tonnage trends are representative of the ~~weakening~~weakened domestic and global economies due, in part, to turmoil in the financial markets and the related effects on industrial production and the residential and commercial construction and retail sectors. For the month of ~~October 2008,~~April 2009, average daily total tonnage for ABF declined approximately 7%17% compared to the same period last year. There can be no assurances that ABF will not experience further declines in tonnage levels due to a number of factors including, but not limited to, continued weakness in general economic trends.

As a result of the prolonged period of an unfavorable economic environment and the significant decline in tonnage that has occurred since the third quarter of 2008, ABF has implemented cost reduction programs. ABF is generally effective in managing its costs to business levels. However, incremental reductions in labor and other operating costs become increasingly challenging and less effective as ABF maintains service levels and continues its focus on serving the regional markets. Furthermore, a larger proportion of ABF’s costs are fixed in nature when maintaining customer service levels. The historically severe declines in tonnage levels that occurred in the fourth quarter of 2008 and continued through the first quarter of 2009 had a significant impact on ABF’s operating results due to ABF’s inability to correspondingly adjust its cost structure throughout the ABF system and to secure adequate pricing. ABF’s operating results will continue to be adversely impacted if tonnage remains at these levels.

2621

~~ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION~~


ITEM 2.		MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — continued

The industry pricing environment is another key to ABF’s operating performance. The pricing environment, which generally becomes more competitive during periods of lower tonnage levels, influences ABF’s ability to obtain compensatory margins and price increases on customer accounts. ABF’s pricing is typically measured by billed revenue per ~~hundredweight.~~hundredweight, which is a reasonable, although approximate, measure of price change. This measure is affected by freight profile factors such as average shipment size, average length of haul, freight density and customer and geographic mix. ~~For many years, consistent freight profile characteristics made~~ABF focuses on individual account profitability rather than billed revenue per hundredweight ~~changes a reasonable, although approximate, measure of price change. In~~when considering customer account or market evaluations due to the ~~last few years, it has become more difficult to quantify~~difficulty in quantifying, with sufficient accuracy, the impact of changes in freight profile characteristics, which is necessary to estimate true price changes. ~~ABF focuses on individual account profitability and rarely considers revenue per hundredweight in its customer account or market evaluations. For ABF,~~However, total company profitability ~~must be~~for ABF is considered together with measures of billed revenue per hundredweight. ~~The pricing environment generally becomes more competitive during periods of lower tonnage levels. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, the pricing environment was competitive.~~ Total billed revenue per hundredweight ~~increased 5.8% and 5.6%, respectively,~~decreased 9.4% during the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008~~March 31, 2009 versus the same ~~periods in 2007~~period of 2008, primarily due to lower fuel surcharges resulting from ~~higher~~lower fuel-related costs. ABF also experienced freight profile changes during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2008~~March 31, 2009 that impacted the reported billed revenue per hundredweight, as further discussed in the ABF section. Excluding freight profile changes and the ~~increase~~changes in fuel surcharges, pricing on ABF’s traditional less-than-truckload (“LTL”) business improved only slightly in the ~~third~~first quarter of 2009. The fuel surcharge constituted a higher proportion of the total freight rate during the majority of 2008, as further discussed below. Management believes that higher fuel surcharges, along with the competitive environment, prevented ABF from securing adequate increases in base LTL rates during periods of higher fuel levels in 2008. Obtaining base rate increases involves a lengthy process to address the pricing and resulting profitability of individual customer accounts. Prolonged periods with insufficient ~~price improvement would~~base LTL rate improvements result in operating ratio deterioration as elements of unit cost, including contractual wage rates, ~~increase throughout ABF’s system. Management~~continue to increase. The pricing environment was very competitive during the first quarter of 2009 and management expects the pricing environment ~~in 2008~~ to remain competitive in 2009.

Effective January 5, 2009, ABF implemented a general rate increase of 5.79% to cover known and expected cost increases, although ~~there can be no assurances~~the amounts vary by lane and shipment characteristic. The 2009 general rate increase, which is in ~~this regard.~~line with increases announced by other LTL carriers, was implemented four weeks earlier than the 2008 increase. The general rate increase affected approximately 45% of ABF’s first quarter 2009 business, while rate increases on the remaining business are subject to individual negotiations. ABF’s ability to retain the general rate increase and to increase rates on the remainder of its business is dependent on the competitive pricing environment.

The transportation industry is dependent upon the availability of adequate fuel supplies. The Company has not experienced a lack of available fuel but could be adversely impacted if a fuel shortage were to develop. ABF charges a fuel surcharge based on changes in diesel fuel prices compared to a national index. The ABF fuel surcharge rate in effect is available on the ABF Web site atabf.com. (The information contained on the ABF Web site is not a part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference into this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.) Although revenues from fuel surcharges generally more than offset increases in direct diesel fuel costs, other operating costs have been, and may continue to be, impacted by fluctuating fuel prices. The total impact of ~~higher~~ energy prices on other nonfuel-related expenses is difficult to ascertain. ABF cannot predict, with reasonable certainty, future fuel price fluctuations, the impact of ~~higher~~ energy prices on other cost elements, recoverability of ~~higher~~ fuel costs through fuel surcharges, and the effect of fuel surcharges on ABF’s overall rate structure or the total price that ABF will receive from its customers. During periods of changing diesel fuel prices, the fuel surcharge and associated direct diesel fuel costs also vary by different degrees. Depending upon the rates of these changes and the impact on costs in other fuel- and energy-related areas, operating margins could be impacted. ABF experienced significantly higher fuel prices in the first nine months of 2008 compared to the same period in 2007, and as a result, ABF’s cost increases in fuel and other energy-related areas outpaced increases in revenue, including fuel surcharge, which negatively impacted margins. Whether fuel prices fluctuate or remain constant, ABF’s operating income may be adversely affected if competitive pressures limit its ability to recover fuel surcharges. ~~Through~~Throughout the first ~~nine~~three months of ~~2008,~~2009, the fuel surcharge mechanism ~~continued to have~~had strong market acceptance among


ITEM 2.		MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — continued

ABF ~~customers, although certain nonstandard arrangements have limited the amount of fuel surcharge recovered.~~customers. While the fuel surcharge is one of several components in ABF’s overall rate structure, the actual rate paid by customers is governed by market forces based on value provided to the customer. ABF experienced significantly higher fuel prices in the first ten months of 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. Beginning in the middle of July 2008, fuel prices began to steadily decline, and as of ~~late-October,~~the end of April 2009, the fuel surcharge rate was approximately 1525 revenue percentage points below the ~~third quarter~~ peak reached in July 2008. As fuel prices ~~decline, lower~~and the related fuel surcharge levels ~~may over time improve ABF’s ability~~have declined in recent quarters, ABF has not been able to increase other elements of margin ~~although there can be no assurances in this regard. However, as mentioned above, pricing on ABF’s base LTL business improved only slightly over the prior year third quarter,~~primarily due to the competitive environment ~~during the recent periods~~which has been influenced by lower levels of ~~lower tonnage levels.~~

~~ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION~~
~~AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — continued~~available tonnage.

Labor costs are impacted by ABF’s contractual obligations under its labor agreement primarily with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (“IBT”). The current five-year collective bargaining agreement, which became effective April 1, 2008, provides for compounded annual contractual wage and benefit increases of approximately 4%, subject to wage rate cost-of-living ~~adjustments.~~adjustments, as further discussed in the ABF section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis. Labor costs include retirement and health care benefits for ABF’s contractual employees that are provided by a number of multiemployer plans (see Note E to the accompanying consolidated financial statements). ABF’s ability to effectively manage labor costs, which amounted to ~~approximately 58%~~72.3% of ABF’s revenues for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, has a direct impact on its operating performance. ABF is generally effective in managing its labor costs to business levels, although incremental labor reductions are more challenging during periods of rapid declines in tonnage and over prolonged periods of depressed tonnage levels. Shipments per dock, street and yard (“DSY”) hour and total pounds per mile are measures ABF uses to assess the effectiveness of labor costs. Shipments per DSY hour is used to measure effectiveness in ABF’s local operations, although total pounds per DSY hour is also a relevant measure when the average shipment size is changing. Total pounds per mile is used by ABF to measure the effectiveness of its linehaul operations, although this metric is influenced by other factors including freight density, loading efficiency, average length of haul and the degree to which rail service is used. ABF’s rail utilization and average length of haul ~~has~~have been declining in recent quarters, ~~primarily reflecting~~due in part to the enhanced regional service offering ~~and, as~~discussed in the following paragraph. As a result, total pounds per mile has become a less ~~relevant~~effective measure of the ~~effectiveness~~productivity of ABF’s operations and labor costs. Labor costs include retirement and health care benefits for ABF’s contractual employees that are provided by a number of multiemployer plans (see Note G to the accompanying consolidated financial statements).

In addition to the traditional long-haul operating model, ABF has implemented a regional network to facilitate its customers’ next-day and second-day delivery needs. The operational implementation of this regional network began in June 2005 in certain ABF facilities in the northeast United States. Through a multi-phased program, ABF’s regional network now covers the eastern two-thirds of the United States. Further operational changes, which were implemented in ~~August 2008 and marketed beginning in late September~~the third quarter of 2008, reduced transit times in the regional network and in certain of ABF’s long-haul lanes. These changes ~~are~~were facilitated by ABF’s ~~new~~current labor contract, which became effective April 1, 2008. Management estimates that the costs of the regional initiative increased ABF’s operating ratio by 1.9 percentage points for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to 1.0 percentage point for the three months ended March 31, 2008. Anticipated future expansion of the regional network to the Western region of the United States ~~which may be implemented in 2009,~~ and the operational changes implemented during the third quarter of 2008 in the eastern two-thirds of the United States will increase the annual cost of operating this program and, depending on revenue levels, may ~~impact~~continue to adversely effect ABF’s operating ~~ratio.~~ratio in 2009.

The Company ended the ~~third~~first quarter ~~2008~~of 2009 with ~~$231.4~~$188.5 million of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, ~~$673.5~~$605.5 million in stockholders’ equity and no borrowings under its revolving Credit Agreement. Because of the Company’s financial position at ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, the Company should continue to be in a position to pursue various initiatives.

2823

~~ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION~~


ITEM 2.		MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — continued

Consolidated Results


									Three Months Ended March 31
									2009			2008
	Three Months Ended September 30								($ thousands, except workdays
	2008		2007			% Change			and per share data)
	($ thousands, except workdays and per share data)
WORKDAYS		64.0		63.0						62.5			63.5

OPERATING REVENUES
ABF	$	476,323	$	468,416					$	323,113		$	427,747
Other revenues and eliminations		19,492		17,623						16,564			19,764

	$	495,815	$	486,039			2.0	%	$	339,677		$	447,511


OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)
ABF	$	25,176	$	28,457					$	(26,843	)	$	12,880
Other and eliminations		316		(271	)					(1,758	)		272

	$	25,492	$	28,186			(9.6	)%	$	(28,601	)	$	13,152


DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE	$	0.61	$	0.75			(18.7	)%
DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE									$	(0.73	)	$	0.34

Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30 September 30
2008 2007 2008 2007
EFFECT ON DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:

(Decrease) increase in cash surrender value of life insurance policies, included in other income⁽¹⁾
$ (0.03 ) $ 0.04 $ (0.06 ) $ 0.07
Interest and dividend income, net of taxes⁽²⁾
0.04 0.05 0.12 0.15
Alternative fuels tax credit⁽³⁾
0.01 0.03 0.03 0.03

~~ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION~~
~~AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — continued~~


~~(2)~~		The decrease in interest and dividend income, net of taxes, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 reflects a decline in the after-tax return on cash equivalents and short-term investments in 2008 compared to 2007.

~~(3)~~		The alternative fuels tax credit associated with propane usage during the first nine months of 2007 was recorded for the first time in third quarter 2007 following the certification process. The third quarter 2008 reflects the related tax credit for the three months ended September 30, 2008.

ABF Freight System, Inc.

The following table sets forth a summary of operating expenses and operating income (loss) as a percentage of revenue for ABF, the Company’s only reportable operating segment:


													Three Months Ended
													March 31
	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended						2009			2008
	September 30						September 30
	2008			2007			2008			2007
ABF OPERATING EXPENSES AND COSTS

Salaries, wages and benefits		56.9	%		59.3	%		58.0	%		60.9	%		72.3	%		60.3	%
Supplies and expenses		19.7			16.1			19.7			16.2
Fuel, supplies and expenses														15.6			19.1
Operating taxes and licenses		2.5			2.6			2.6			2.7			3.3			2.8
Insurance		1.2			1.4			1.1			1.2			1.1			1.1
Communications and utilities		0.8			0.8			0.8			0.9			1.2			0.9
Depreciation and amortization		3.8			4.0			4.0			4.2			5.8			4.3
Rents and purchased transportation		9.6			9.4			9.0			8.9			8.6			8.4
Gain on sale of property and equipment		(0.1	)		(0.2	)		(0.2	)		(0.2	)		(0.2	)		(0.4	)
Other		0.3			0.5			0.4			0.3			0.6			0.5

		94.7	%		93.9	%		95.4	%		95.1	%		108.3	%		97.0	%


ABF OPERATING INCOME		5.3	%		6.1	%		4.6	%		4.9	%
ABF OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)														(8.3	)%		3.0	%

Three Months Ended September 30
2008 2007 % Change
Workdays 64.0 63.0
Billed revenue* per hundredweight, including fuel surcharges $ 27.75 $ 26.22 5.8 %
Pounds 1,708,073,753 1,771,179,959 (3.6 )%
Pounds per day 26,688,652 28,113,968 (5.1 )%
Shipments per DSY hour 0.481 0.478 0.6 %
Pounds per DSY hour 639.07 614.16 4.1 %
Pounds per shipment 1,328 1,284 3.4 %
Pounds per mile 18.56 17.99 3.2 %

~~ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION~~
~~AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — continued~~


								Three Months Ended March 31
								2009		2008		% Change
	Nine Months Ended September 30
	2008		2007		% Change
Workdays		191.5		190.5					62.5		63.5
Billed revenue* per hundredweight, including fuel surcharges	$	27.17	$	25.74		5.6	%	$	23.85	$	26.32		(9.4	)%
Pounds		5,106,065,085		5,173,102,809		(1.3	)%		1,357,394,548		1,636,261,073		(17.0	)%
Pounds per day		26,663,525		27,155,395		(1.8	)%		21,718,313		25,767,891		(15.7	)%
Shipments per DSY hour		0.486		0.482		0.8	%		0.486		0.489		(0.6	)%
Pounds per DSY hour		638.59		613.40		4.1	%		620.18		621.15		(0.2	)%
Pounds per shipment		1,314		1,272		3.3	%		1,275		1,270		0.4	%
Pounds per mile		19.09		18.54		3.0	%		19.09		19.24		(0.8	)%


ITEM 2.		MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — continued

ABF’s revenue for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008~~March 31, 2009 was ~~$476.3~~$323.1 million ~~and $1,383.6 million, respectively,~~ compared to ~~$468.4 million and $1,329.4~~$427.7 million reported for the same ~~periods~~period in ~~2007.~~2008. ABF’s revenue per day ~~increased 0.1% and 3.5%~~decreased 23.3% for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008, respectively,~~March 31, 2009 as compared to the same ~~periods~~period in ~~2007.~~2008. The revenue ~~increase~~decrease primarily reflects a ~~5.8%~~15.7% decline in tonnage per day and ~~5.6% increase~~a 9.4% decrease in billed revenue per hundredweight for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008, respectively,~~March 31, 2009, as compared to the same ~~periods~~period in ~~2007, which was largely attributable to higher fuel surcharges.~~2008. The ~~increase~~decrease in billed revenue per hundredweight was ~~partially offset by tonnage declines~~largely attributable to lower fuel surcharges. ABF charges a fuel surcharge based on changes in ~~the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 of 5.1% and 1.8%, respectively, on a per-day basis~~diesel fuel prices compared to a national index. The ABF fuel surcharge rate in effect is available atabf.com. (The information contained on the ~~same periods in 2007.~~ABF Web site is not a part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference into the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.)

Effective January 5, 2009 and February 4, 2008, ~~and March 26, 2007,~~ ABF implemented general rate increases to cover known and expected cost increases. Nominally, the increases were ~~5.45%~~5.79% and ~~4.95%~~5.45%, respectively, although the amounts vary by lane and shipment characteristics. The ~~2008~~2009 general rate increase, which is in line with increases announced by other LTL carriers, was implemented ~~seven~~four weeks earlier than the ~~increase put in place in 2007.~~2008 increase. For the ~~first nine~~three months ~~of 2008,~~ended March 31, 2009, approximately ~~60%~~55% of ABF’s ~~LTL~~ revenue was generated from customers that were not immediately impacted by the general rate increase due to other pricing arrangements that are effective at various times throughout the year. ABF’s ability to retain rate increases is dependent on the competitive pricing environment. ~~ABF also charges a fuel surcharge based on changes in diesel fuel prices compared to a national index. The ABF fuel surcharge rate in effect is available at abf.com.~~

ABF’s ~~5.8% and 5.6% increase in~~ billed revenue per hundredweight for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008~~March 31, 2009 compared to the same ~~periods~~period in ~~2007~~2008 was impacted not only by lower fuel surcharges and the general rate increase, ~~and fuel surcharge,~~ but also by changes in profile such as length of haul, pounds per shipment, freight density and customer and geographic mix. ~~Total weight per shipment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased 3.4% and 3.3% compared to the same periods in 2007.~~ ABF’s length of haul decreased ~~3.1% and 2.8%~~1.4% in the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008~~March 31, 2009 compared to the same ~~periods~~period in ~~2007,~~2008, influenced in part by the regional freight initiative. Total weight per shipment for the three months ended March 31, 2009 increased slightly compared to the same period in 2008. In addition, ABF experienced a higher proportion of truckload-rated shipments, including business in the volume spot market. ~~Increased weight per shipment, combined with a~~A shorter length of haul combined with increased weight per shipment and a higher mix of truckload-rated shipments, has the effect of decreasing the nominal revenue per hundredweight without a commensurate impact on effective pricing or shipment profitability. As fuel prices ~~have~~ increased substantially ~~compared to~~throughout the ~~prior year,~~first half of 2008, the associated higher fuel surcharges ~~have~~

~~ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION~~
~~AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — continued~~

constituted a larger proportion of the total freight rate and influenced ABF’s ability to obtain increases in base freight rates. ~~Excluding freight profile changes and the increase in fuel surcharges, pricing on ABF’s traditional LTL business improved slightly during the third quarter of 2008 compared to the prior year period.~~ Fuel prices and the associated fuel surcharge have significantly declined since the middle of July 2008. ABF’s average fuel surcharge in effect during the first quarter of 2009 was 13.2 revenue percentage points below the comparable prior year quarter. ABF’s ability to improve its operating ratio during periods of rapidly declining fuel surcharge levels is dependent on securing price increases to cover contractual wage rates and other increases in cost elements. However, obtaining overall base rate increases involves a lengthy process to address the pricing and resulting profitability of individual customer accounts. Excluding freight profile changes and the increase in fuel surcharges, pricing on ABF’s traditional LTL business during the first quarter of 2009, which reflects the impact of the recent general rate increase, improved only slightly compared to the prior year period. For the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, billed revenue per hundredweight compared to the same ~~periods~~period in ~~2007~~2008 reflects a very competitive pricing environment.

ABF generated an operating ~~income~~loss of ~~$25.2 million and $63.6~~$26.8 million for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008~~March 31, 2009 versus ~~$28.5 million and $64.7~~operating income of $12.9 million during the same ~~periods~~period in ~~2007.~~

2008. ABF’s ~~third~~first quarter ~~2008~~2009 operating ratio increased to ~~94.7%~~108.3% from ~~93.9%~~97.0% in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2007. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, ABF’s operating ratio increased slightly to 95.4% from 95.1%~~2008. The increase in ~~the same period in 2007.~~ ABF’s operating ratio was influenced by ~~changes~~the decline in freight tonnage levels previously discussed and the effects of base LTL rates not adequately covering increases in elements of cost, including contractual wage rates. Changes in operating expenses, aswhich had an impact on ABF’s operating ratio, are discussed in the following paragraphs.


ITEM 2.		MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — continued

Salaries, wages and benefits expense for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008 decreased 2.4% and 2.9%~~March 31, 2009 increased 12.0% of revenues ~~respectively.~~compared to the same period in 2008. Portions of salaries, wages and benefits are fixed in nature and ~~decrease,~~increase, as a percent of revenue, with ~~increases~~decreases in revenue levels including fuel surcharges. ~~Salaries, wages and benefits expense was favorably impacted by~~ABF is generally effective in managing ~~labor~~its costs to business levels. However, during periods of declining tonnage levels which ABF has experienced in recent quarters, incremental reductions in labor and other operating costs become increasingly challenging and less effective as ~~measured~~ABF maintains service levels and continues its focus on serving the regional markets. The challenges of adjusting the cost structure throughout the ABF system are evidenced by the 0.6% decrease in shipments per DSY, a slight decrease in pounds per DSY hour and ~~pounds per mile. For~~ the ~~three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, pounds per DSY hour increased 4.1% and~~0.8% decrease in pounds per mile ~~increased 3.2% and 3.0%, respectively,~~for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared ~~with~~to same period of 2008. These measures improved sequentially throughout the ~~prior year periods, primarily reflecting improved management of labor costs.~~first quarter 2009 due, in part, to cost control initiatives.

~~Compared to the same prior year period, the decrease~~The increase in salaries, wages and benefits as a percent of revenues for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2009 compared to the first quarter of 2008 was impacted by a $5.6 million and $7.3 million reduction in workers’ compensation costs primarily reflecting a decline in the frequency and severity of existing claims and the associated loss development on those claims. The change in workers’ compensation expense from the nine months ended September 30, 2008 versus the comparable prior year period was also influenced by lower development factors applied to existing claims resulting from ABF’s annual first quarter review of historical claims development. Workers’ compensation costs as a percent of revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 were below ABF’s ten-year historical average.

~~The decrease in salaries, wages and benefits described above was offset, in part,~~ by contractual increases under the IBT National Freight Industry Standards Agreement. The annual contractual wage increases effective on April 1, of2009 and 2008 were 1.8% and ~~2007 were~~ 2.2% ~~and 2.3%~~, respectively. On August 1, ~~2007,~~2008, health, welfare and pension benefit costs under the agreement increased ~~6.0%~~8.1%. The ~~contractual~~ increase in salaries, wages and benefits as a percent of revenues was also influenced by an increase in ABF’s nonunion pension expense in the first quarter of 2009 compared to the first quarter of 2008, which impacted the operating ratio comparison by one percentage point. The increase in nonunion pension costs is primarily attributable to higher amortization of actuarial losses and lower expected returns on pension assets in 2009 associated with the effect of market declines on the value of nonunion pension plan assets. The Company’s full-year 2009 nonunion pension cost, which is predominantly related to ABF, is estimated to be approximately $11.0 million more than the amount recognized in 2008 (see Note E to the accompanying consolidated financial statements). In addition, salaries, wages and benefits as a percent of revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was impacted by an increase in ABF’s nonunion health ~~welfare~~claims costs, primarily reflecting unfavorable claims experience under the Company’s self-insured program, which impacted the year-over-year operating ratio comparison by 0.7%. Salaries, wages and ~~pension benefit~~benefits costs ~~effective on August 1, 2008~~were influenced by a decrease in workers’ compensation expense, which impacted ABF’s operating ratio for the three months ended March 31, 2009 by 0.4% compared to the prior year period. ABF’s annual first quarter review of historical workers’ compensation claims development resulted in lower factors applied to existing claims as compared to the prior year and was ~~8.1%.~~the primary component of the decline in workers’ compensation expense. The remaining decrease in workers’ compensation costs was attributable to favorable claims experience. Workers’ compensation costs as a percent of revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2009 were below ABF’s ten-year historical average.

~~Supplies~~Fuel, supplies and expenses ~~increased 3.6% and~~decreased 3.5% of revenues for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008, respectively,~~March 31, 2009 compared to the same ~~periods~~period in ~~2007.~~2008. This ~~increase~~decrease primarily reflects significantly ~~higher~~lower fuel costs as the average price per gallon of fuel ~~increased 56.7% and 57.1%~~decreased 48.8% in the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008, respectively,~~March 31, 2009, compared to the same ~~periods~~period in ~~2007.~~2008.

~~Insurance costs decreased 0.2%~~Operating taxes and licenses increased 0.5% of revenues and communications and utilities increased 0.3% of revenues for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2008 and declined slightly as a percent of revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2008~~March 31, 2009 versus the comparable prior year ~~periods.~~ period. A portion of these expenses are fixed in nature and increase as a percent of revenue, with decreases in revenue levels including fuel surcharges.

Depreciation and amortization increased 1.5% of revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. Depreciation and amortization charges are generally fixed in nature and increase as a percentage of revenue with decreases in revenue levels including fuel surcharges.The ~~favorable change~~increase in ~~insurance expense is primarily the result~~these costs also reflects higher depreciation due to higher unit costs of revenue equipment, partially offset by a decrease in ~~cargo loss and damage claims, reflecting ABF’s attention~~fleet size in the first quarter of 2009 compared to ~~careful cargo handling as measured by an improved cargo claim ratio.~~the first quarter of 2008.

3227

~~ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION~~


ITEM 2.		MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — continued

Depreciation and amortization decreased 0.2% of revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same periods in 2007. This change primarily reflects lower depreciation on revenue equipment due to the timing of purchases of replacement equipment, combined with a modest reduction in fleet size associated with the lower tonnage levels.

Rents and purchased transportation decreased $8.1 million, but increased 0.2% of revenues for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2008 and increased slightly as a percent of revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2008~~March 31, 2009 versus the ~~comparable~~ prior year ~~periods.~~period. The ~~increase~~decrease in ~~third quarter 2008 reflects the increase in the cost of rail services, largely~~costs is primarily due to ~~higher~~lower fuel surcharges ~~partially offset by~~on purchased transportation costs over the comparable periods and a decline in rail utilization to ~~11.8%~~10.0% of total miles in ~~third~~the first quarter ~~2008~~of 2009 from ~~13.6%~~10.3% of total miles in ~~third quarter 2007.~~the same prior year period. Certain of these costs are fixed in nature and increase as a percent of revenues with decreases in revenue levels.

~~Accounts Receivable~~Prepaid and Refundable Income Taxes

~~Accounts receivable, less allowances,~~Prepaid and refundable income taxes increased ~~$6.8~~$19.0 million from December 31, ~~2007~~2008 to ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, primarily due to ~~an increase~~the operating loss in ~~revenue levels~~the first quarter of 2009 and tax benefits of the $15.5 million contributions made in ~~September 2008 compared~~March 2009 to ~~December 2007.~~the nonunion defined benefit pension plan.

~~Other Long-Term Assets~~Pension and Postretirement Liabilities

~~Other long-term assets~~Pension and postretirement liabilities decreased ~~$16.5~~$14.9 million from December 31, ~~2007~~2008 to ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2009, primarily due to contributions made to the nonunion defined benefit pension plan.

Deferred Income Tax Liabilities

Net deferred income tax liabilities increased $9.1 million from December 31, 2008 to March 31, 2009, primarily due to the ~~sale~~effect of ~~assets classified as held~~contributions made to the nonunion defined benefit pension plan and the effect of accelerated depreciation methods used for ~~sale and distributions made from the trust of the Company’s Voluntary Savings Plan, a non-qualified deferred compensation program.~~

~~Accounts Payable~~

~~Accounts payable increased $6.3 million from December 31, 2007 to September 30, 2008, primarily due to accruals for revenue equipment received but not yet paid for as of September 30, 2008.~~

~~Other Long-Term Liabilities~~

Other long-term liabilities decreased $5.7 million from December 31, 2007 to September 30, 2008, primarily due to distributions from the Voluntary Savings Plan, a nonqualified deferred compensation plan.income tax purposes.

Income Taxes

The difference between the Company’s effective tax rate and the federal statutory rate primarily results from the effect of state income taxes, nondeductible expenses and alternative fuel tax ~~credits and, for 2007 only, tax-exempt income.~~credits. The federal tax benefit recorded in the first quarter of 2009 will be realized by refund of taxes paid in prior years through loss carrybacks allowed by the U.S. Internal Revenue Code.

Seasonality

ABF is impacted by seasonal fluctuations, which affect tonnage and shipment levels. Freight shipments, operating costs and earnings are also affected adversely by inclement weather conditions. The second and third calendar ~~quarter~~quarters of each year usually ~~has~~have the highest tonnage levels while the first quarter generally has the lowest, although other factors, including the state of the economy, may influence quarterly freight tonnage levels.

~~ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION~~
~~AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — continued~~

Effects of Inflation

Management believes that, for the periods presented, inflation has not had a material effect on the Company’s operating results as inflationary increases in labor and fuel costs, which are discussed above, have generally been offset through price increases and fuel surcharges. In periods of increasing fuel prices, the effect of higher associated fuel surcharges on the overall price to the customer influences ABF’s ability to obtain increases in base freight rates. In ~~subsequent~~ periods with rapidly declining fuel surcharge levels, the timing and extent of base price increases on ABF’s revenues may not correspond with contractual increases in wage rates and other inflationary increases in cost elements and as a result could impact the Company’s operating results. ABF’s revenue equipment (tractors and trailers used primarily in ABF’s operations) will likely be replaced during the normal replacement cycles at higher costs which could result in higher depreciation charges on a per-unit basis. ABF


ITEM 2.		MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — continued

considers these costs in setting its pricing policies, although ABF’s overall freight rate structure is governed by market forces based on value provided to the customer.

Forward-Looking Statements

Statements contained in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis section of this report that are not based on historical facts are “forward-looking statements.” Terms such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “intend,” “plan,” “predict,” ~~“prospect,~~“prospects,” “scheduled,” “should,” ~~“would”~~“would,” and similar expressions and the negatives of such terms are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are by their nature subject to uncertainties and risk, including, but not limited to, ~~union relations;~~current adverse economic conditions; the impact of any limitations on our customers’ access to adequate financial resources; availability and cost of capital; shifts in market demand; weather conditions; the performance and needs of industries served by ~~the Company’s~~Arkansas Best Corporation’s subsidiaries; ~~actual~~ future costs of operating expenses such as fuel and related taxes; self-insurance ~~claims;~~claims and insurance premium costs; relationships with employees, including unions; union and ~~nonunion~~non-union employee wages and ~~benefits; actual~~benefits, including changes in required contributions to multiemployer pension plans; governmental regulations and policies; costs of continuing investments in technology; the timing and amount of capital expenditures; the cost, integration and performance of any future acquisitions; competitive initiatives, pricing pressures and ~~pricing pressures; general economic conditions;~~the effect of volatility in fuel prices and the associated changes in fuel surcharges on securing increases in base freight rates; and other financial, operational and legal risks and uncertainties detailed from time to time in ~~the Company’s~~Arkansas Best Corporation’s Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) public filings.

3429

~~ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK~~


ITEM 3.		QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market Risk

~~The Company is exposed to market risk, including changes in certain interest rates, prices of diesel fuel and credit ratings.~~ Since December 31, ~~2007,~~2008, there have been no significant changes in the Company’s market risks as reported in the Company’s ~~2007~~2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K; however, the instability in the financial and credit markets has created volatility in various interest rates and returns on invested assets during the nine months ended September 30, 2008. In addition, equity and fixed income assets held in the Company’s non-union pension plan are subject to market risk (see Note G, Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans, under Item 1 of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q).10-K.

3530

~~ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES~~


ITEM 4.		CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was performed with the participation of the Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of ~~September 30, 2008.~~March 31 2009. There have been no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

3631

PART II.
OTHER INFORMATION
ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

For information related to the Company’s legal proceedings, see Note I, Legal Proceedings and Environmental Matters under Part 1,I, Item 1, of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

The Company’s risk factors are fully described in the Company’s ~~2007~~2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K. No material changes to the Company’s risk factors have occurred since the Company filed its ~~2007~~2008 Form 10-K.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

~~(a) Recent sales of unregistered securities.~~

(a)

Recent sales of unregistered securities.

None.

~~(b) Use of proceeds from registered securities.~~

(b)

Use of proceeds from registered securities.

None.

~~(c) Purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers.~~

(c)

Purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers.

The Company has a program to repurchase $75.0 million of its Common Stock in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. The repurchases may be made either from the Company’s cash reserves or from other available sources. The program has no expiration date but may be terminated at any time at the Board of Directors’ discretion. As of ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, the Company has purchased 1,618,150 shares for an aggregate cost of $56.8 million, leaving $18.2 million available for repurchase under the program. The Company made no repurchases during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2008.~~March 31, 2009.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

None.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

None.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

3732

PART II. — continued

OTHER INFORMATION
ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.

The following exhibits are filed or furnished with this report or are incorporated by reference to previously filed material:


Exhibit
No.

3.1			Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 under the Securities Act of 1933 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) on March 17, 1992, Commission File No. 33-46483, and incorporated herein by reference).

3.2	*	~~Amended and Restated Bylaws~~	Certificate of Designations of $2.875 Series A Cumulative Convertible Exchangeable Preferred Stock of the ~~Company dated as~~Company.

3.3			Certificate of ~~October 18, 2007~~Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (previously filed as Exhibit ~~3.2~~3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on ~~October~~April 24, ~~2007,~~2009, Commission File No. 0-19969, and incorporated herein by reference).

3.4			Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company dated as of April 21, 2009 (previously filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on April 24, 2009, Commission File No. 0-19969, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.1			First Amended and Restated Rights Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2001 between Arkansas Best Corporation and Computershare Investor Services, LLC, as Rights Agent (including exhibits thereto)~~. (Previously~~ (previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-A/A Amendment No. 2 filed with the Commission on May 16, 2001, Commission File No. 000-19969, and incorporated herein by ~~reference.)~~reference).

4.2			Amendment to First Amended and Restated Rights Agreement, dated as of April 4, 2003 between Arkansas Best Corporation and LaSalle Bank, National Association, as Rights ~~Agent. (Previously~~Agent (previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Form 8-A/A Amendment No. 3 filed with the Commission on April 4, 2003, Commission File No. 000-19969, and incorporated herein by ~~reference.)~~reference).

4.3			Second Amendment to First Amended and Restated Rights Agreement, dated as of May 18, 2007 between Arkansas Best Corporation and LaSalle Bank, National Association, as Rights ~~Agent. (Previously~~Agent (previously filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 18, 2007, Commission File No. 000-19969, and incorporated herein by ~~reference.)~~reference).

31.1*10.1	#*		The Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (Non-Employee Directors — with deferral feature).

10.2	#*		The Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (Employees).

10.3	#		The [__] Schedule — ABF Annual Incentive Compensation Plan and form of award (previously filed as Exhibit 10.13 to the Company’s 2008 Form 10-K filed with the Commission on February 20, 2009, Commission File No. 000-19969, and incorporated herein by reference).

PART II. — continued

OTHER INFORMATION
ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS. — continued


Exhibit
No.

10.4	#	The [__] Schedule — ABC Annual Incentive Compensation Plan and form of award (previously filed as Exhibit 10.14 to the Company’s 2008 Form 10-K filed with the Commission on February 20, 2009, Commission File No. 000-19969, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.5	#	The ABC/DTC/ABF Long-Term (3-Year) Incentive Compensation Plan — Total, ROCE Portion and Growth Portion and form of award (previously filed as Exhibit 10.15 to the Company’s 2008 Form 10-K filed with the Commission on February 20, 2009, Commission File No. 000-19969, and incorporated herein by reference).

31.1	*	Certifications Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2*31.2	*	Certifications Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32**		Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


#		Designates a compensation plan or arrangement for Directors or Executive Officers.

*		Filed herewith.

**		Furnished herewith.

3834

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


			ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION
		(Registrant)

Date: ~~November~~May 5, ~~2008~~	2009	/s/ Judy R. McReynolds

			Judy R. McReynolds
		Senior Vice President — Chief Financial Officer,
		Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer

3935


				Page

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

	Item 1.		Financial Statements

			Consolidated Balance Sheets — March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008		3
~~Item 1. Financial Statements~~

Consolidated ~~Balance Sheets —- September 30,~~Statements of Operations — For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 ~~and December 31, 2007~~		3	5

~~Consolidated Statements of Income — For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007~~		5

~~Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008~~		6

~~Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007~~		7

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~		8

~~Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations~~		21

~~Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk~~		35

~~Item 4. Controls and Procedures~~		36

~~PART II. OTHER INFORMATION~~
			Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009		6
~~Item 1. Legal Proceedings~~		37
			Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008		7

			Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		8

	Item 2.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		17

	Item 3.		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		30

	Item 4.		Controls and Procedures		31

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

~~Item 1A. Risk Factors~~		37Item 1.		Legal Proceedings		32

	Item 1A.		Risk Factors		32

	Item 2.		Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			37	32

	Item 3.		Defaults Upon Senior Securities			37	32

	Item 4.		Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders			37	32

~~Item 5. Other Information~~		37Item 5.		Other Information		32

~~Item 6. Exhibits~~		38Item 6.		Exhibits		33

~~SIGNATURES~~
39SIGNATURES					35

Certifications Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002					36
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002					38
EX-3.2
EX-10.1
EX-10.2
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32


(1)		~~Does not include $3.1 million and $3.7~~Includes $15.5 million of ~~equipment which was received but not yet paid~~contributions to the Company’s nonunion pension plan for ~~at September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.~~the three months ended March 31, 2009.


~~(1)~~ITEM 2.		The decrease in the cash surrender value of life insurance policies for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 reflects the overall decline in the financial markets during 2008. Changes in cash surrender value of life insurance policies do not affect income tax expense.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — continued


*		Billed revenue does not include revenue deferral required for financial statement purposes under the Company’s revenue recognition policy.