UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 10-Q

(MARK ONE)

             [X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

               FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNESEPTEMBER 30, 2004

                                       OR

            [ ]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                         COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-11848

                   REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED
             (EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)

       MISSOURI                                           43-1627032
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION                             (IRS EMPLOYER
OF INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION)                       IDENTIFICATION NUMBER)

                          1370 TIMBERLAKE MANOR PARKWAY
                          CHESTERFIELD, MISSOURI 63017
                    (ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)
                                 (636) 736-7439
              (REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE)

      INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT (1) HAS FILED ALL REPORTS
REQUIRED TO BE FILED BY SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 DURING THE PRECEDING 12 MONTHS (OR FOR SUCH SHORTER PERIOD THAT THE
REGISTRANT WAS REQUIRED TO FILE SUCH REPORTS), AND (2) HAS BEEN SUBJECT TO SUCH
FILING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PAST 90 DAYS.

                                 YES [X] NO [ ]

INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT IS AN ACCELERATED FILER (AS
DEFINED IN RULE 12B-212b-2 OF THE EXCHANGE ACT). YES [X]  NO [NO[ ]

COMMON STOCK OUTSTANDING ($.01 PAR VALUE) AS OF JULYOCTOBER 31, 2004: 62,324,74062,384,481
SHARES



           REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                TABLE OF CONTENTS

ITEM PAGE - ---- ---- PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION 1 Financial Statements Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) JuneSeptember 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 3 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited) Three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2004 and 2003 4 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) SixNine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2004 and 2003 5 Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) 6-106 2 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 11-2612 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 2633 4 Controls and Procedures 2633 PART II - OTHER INFORMATION 1 Legal Proceedings 2733 2 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds 27 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 2734 6 Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K 2834 Signatures 2935 Index to Exhibits 3036
2 REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)
JuneSeptember 30, December 31, 2004 2003 ------------------------- -------------- (Dollars in thousands) ASSETS Fixed maturity securities: Available-for-sale at fair value (amortized cost of $4,538,843$5,480,005 and $4,298,597 at JuneSeptember 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively) $ 4,666,8755,775,597 $ 4,575,735 Mortgage loans on real estate 541,447552,250 479,312 Policy loans 901,098905,155 902,857 Funds withheld at interest 3,023,7022,535,741 2,717,278 Short-term investments 7,52914,996 28,917 Other invested assets 234,905239,096 179,320 ------------ --------------------------- Total investments 9,375,55610,022,835 8,883,419 Cash and cash equivalents 127,316129,206 84,586 Accrued investment income 72,27492,251 47,961 Premiums receivable 324,534327,649 412,413 ReinsurancecededReinsurance ceded receivables 382,497426,903 463,557 Deferred policy acquisition costs 1,954,2562,080,926 1,757,096 Other reinsurance balances 191,358159,373 387,108 Other assets 81,18774,243 77,234 ------------ --------------------------- Total assets $ 12,508,97813,313,386 $ 12,113,374 ============ =========================== LIABILITIES AND STOCK HOLDERS'STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Future policy benefits $ 3,601,3573,795,399 $ 3,550,156 Interest sensitive contract liabilities 4,514,9114,740,637 4,170,591 Other policy claims and benefits 1,192,9971,244,573 1,091,038 Other reinsurance balances 185,880221,308 267,706 Deferred income taxes 428,636505,202 438,973 Other liabilities 70,204130,186 90,749 Short-term debt 27,30427,180 - Long-term debt 374,101375,134 398,146 Company-obligated mandatorily redee mableredeemable preferred securities of subsidiary trust holding solely junior subordinated debentures of the Company 158,353158,385 158,292 ------------ --------------------------- Total liabilities 10,553,74311,198,004 10,165,651 Commitments and contingent liabilities - - Stockholders' Equity: Preferred stock (par value $.01 per share; 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding) - - Common stock (par value $.01 per share; 140,000,000 and 75,000,000 shares authorized, respectively; 63,128,273 shares issued at JuneSeptember 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003) 631 631 Warrants 66,915 66,915 Additional paid-in-capital 1,044,2281,045,087 1,042,444 Retained earnings 761,110796,765 641,502 Accumulated other comprehensive income: Accumulated currency translation adjustment, net of income taxes 30,82546,991 53,601 Unrealized appreciation of securities, net of income taxes 75,158181,488 170,658 ------------ --------------------------- Total stockholders' equity before treasury stock 1,978,8672,137,877 1,975,751 Less treasury shares held of 818,833765,364 and 967,927 at cost at JuneSeptember 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively (23,632)(22,495) (28,028) ------------ --------------------------- Total stockholders' equity 1,955,2352,115,382 1,947,723 ------------ --------------------------- Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 12,508,97813,313,386 $ 12,113,374 ============ ===========================
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited). 3 REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
Three months ended JuneSeptember 30, SixNine months ended JuneSeptember 30, ---------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------- 2004 2003 2004 2003 -------------- ----------- ----------- ---------------- ---- ---- ---- (Dollars in thousands, except per share data) REVENUES: Net premiums $ 797,308819,454 $ 582,561572,970 $ 1,611,1822,430,636 $ 1,127,7761,700,746 Investment income, net of related expenses 134,185 115,936 267,745 223,081144,582 122,153 412,327 345,234 Realized investment gains (losses), net 12,691 4,044 31,107 (5,784)664 6,560 31,771 776 Change in value of embedded derivatives 17,472(18,610) - 18,994384 - Other revenues 14,759 11,834 26,609 22,851 -------------- ----------- -----------13,374 10,819 39,983 33,670 ------------ ------------ ------------- ------------- Total revenues 976,415 714,375 1,955,637 1,367,924959,464 712,502 2,915,101 2,080,426 BENEFITS AND EXPENSES: Claims and other policy benefits 634,802 452,632 1,281,856 876,237641,618 457,844 1,923,474 1,334,081 Interest credited 44,332 43,867 91,350 84,66347,336 46,251 138,686 130,914 Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses 134,157 114,988 277,225 219,569148,090 111,334 425,315 330,903 Change in deferred acquisition costs associated with change in value of embedded derivatives 13,293(13,209) - 17,4934,284 - Other operating expenses 34,896 26,837 68,425 52,59236,868 24,683 105,293 77,275 Interest expense 9,542 9,042 19,080 18,001 -------------- ----------- -----------9,655 9,383 28,735 27,384 ------------ ------------ ------------- ------------- Total benefits and expenses 871,022 647,366 1,755,429 1,251,062870,358 649,495 2,625,787 1,900,557 Income from continuing operations before income taxes 105,393 67,009 200,208 116,86289,106 63,007 289,314 179,869 Provision for income taxes 37,003 23,423 68,824 40,116 -------------- ----------- -----------31,107 20,783 99,931 60,899 ------------ ------------ ------------- ------------- Income from continuing operations 68,390 43,586 131,384 76,74657,999 42,224 189,383 118,970 Discontinued operations: Loss from discontinued accident and health operations, net of income taxes (3,053) (1,027) (3,947) (1,445) -------------- ----------- -----------(18,604) (473) (22,551) (1,918) ------------ ------------ ------------- ------------- Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle 65,337 42,559 127,437 75,30139,395 41,751 166,832 117,052 Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of income taxes - - (361) - -------------- ----------- ----------- ------------ ------------ ------------- ------------- Net income $ 65,33739,395 $ 42,55941,751 $ 127,076166,471 $ 75,301 ============== =========== ===========117,052 ============ ============ ============= ============= BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE: Income from continuing operations $ 1.100.93 $ 0.880.85 $ 2.113.04 $ 1.552.39 Discontinued operations (0.05) (0.02) (0.06)(0.30) (0.01) (0.36) (0.03) Cumulative effect of change in accounting principal - - (0.01) - -------------- ----------- ----------- ------------ ------------ ------------- ------------- Net income $ 1.050.63 $ 0.860.84 $ 2.042.67 $ 1.52 ============== =========== ===========2.36 ============ ============ ============= ============= DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE: Income from continuing operations $ 1.090.92 $ 0.870.84 $ 2.093.02 $ 1.542.38 Discontinued operations (0.05) (0.02) (0.06) (0.03)(0.29) (0.01) (0.36) (0.04) Cumulative effect of change in accounting principal - - (0.01) - - -------------- ----------- ----------- ------------ ------------ ------------- ------------- Net income $ 1.040.63 $ 0.850.83 $ 2.032.65 $ 1.51 ============== =========== ===========2.34 ============ ============ ============= ============= DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER SHARE $ 0.06 $ 0.06 $ 0.12 $ 0.12 ============== =========== ===========0.18 0.18 ============ ============ ============= =============
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited). 4 REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
SixNine months ended JuneSeptember 30, --------------------------------------------------------- 2004 2003 ------------- ----------------------------------------- (Dollars in thousands) CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net income $ 127,076166,471 $ 75,301117,052 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Change in: Accrued investment income (24,484) (30,692)(44,179) (42,498) Premiums receivable 90,216 (73,708)90,143 (83,332) Deferred policy acquisition costs (190,057) (152,201) Reinsuranceceded(316,616) (244,916) Reinsurance ceded balances 81,060 42,42036,655 63,271 Future policy benefits, other policy claims and benefits, and other reinsurance balances 297,197 274,103514,368 342,263 Deferred income taxes 55,396 36,43061,929 61,932 Other assets and other liabilities, net (24,604) 29,58542,327 15,797 Amortization of net investment discounts and other (17,153) (20,929)(26,887) (31,302) Realized investment (gains) losses, net (31,107) 5,784(31,771) (776) Other, net (11,448) (14,056) ------------- -------------(8,410) 654 ------------ ------------ Net cash provided by operating activities 352,092 172,037484,030 198,145 CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Sales of fixed maturity securities-availablesecurities - available for sale 668,201 983,370867,516 1,294,644 Maturities of fixed maturity securities - available for sale 10,749 17,02230,059 20,955 Purchases of fixed maturity securities - available for sale (919,319) (1,111,533)(1,376,872) (1,426,275) Sales of mortgage loans 13,927 - Cash invested in mortgage loans ofon real estate (86,072) (139,204)(105,870) (215,616) Cash invested in policy loans (2,381) (1,812)(9,293) (9,181) Cash invested inprovided by (invested in) funds withheld at interest (24,549) (35,888)30,922 (42,671) Principal payments on mortgage loans on real estate 12,041 6,60720,955 8,891 Principal payments on policy loans 4,1406,995 - Change in short-term investments and other invested assets (43,155) (30,820) ------------- -------------(48,614) (71,898) ------------ ------------ Net cash used in investing activities (366,418) (312,258)(570,275) (441,151) CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Dividends to stockholders (7,468) (5,951)(11,208) (8,940) Borrowings under credit agreements 4,600 46,61863,448 Exercise of stock options 6,181 5,5508,176 9,054 Excess deposits on universal life and other investment type policies and contracts 54,263 160,229 ------------- -------------129,387 221,245 ------------ ------------ Net cash provided by financing activities 57,576 206,446130,955 284,807 Effect of ex changeexchange rate changes (520) 3,956 ------------- -------------(90) 3,396 ------------ ------------ Change in cash and cash equivalents 42,730 70,18144,620 45,197 Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 84,586 88,101 ------------- ------------------------- ------------ Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 127,316129,206 $ 158,282 ============= =============133,298 ============ ============ Supplementary disclosure of cash flow information: InterestCash paid for interest $ 18,91522,767 $ 14,468 Income21,634 Cash paid for income taxes paid $ 24,68622,330 $ 4,1775,938 Non-cash transfer from funds withheld at interest to fixed maturity securities $ 606,040 $ -
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited). 5 REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated ("RGA") and its subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company") have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the six-monthnine-month period ended JuneSeptember 30, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2004. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K ("2003 Annual Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 12, 2004. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated and its subsidiaries. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The Company has reclassified the presentation of certain prior-period information to conform to the 2004 presentation. Prior to January 1, 2003, the Company applied Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No. 25 in accounting for its stock plans and, accordingly, no compensation cost was recognized for its stock options in the financial statements. For issuances under employee stock plans after January 1, 2003, the Company follows the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 123 when recording its compensation expense. Had the Company determined compensation cost based on the fair value at the grant date for all stock option grants under SFAS No. 123, the Company's net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below. The effects of applying SFAS No. 123 may not be representative of the effects on reported net income for future years.
THREE MONTHS ENDED SIXNINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE(dollars in thousands, except per share information) SEPTEMBER 30, JUNESEPTEMBER 30, (in thousands)information) 2004 2003 2004 2003 ------------------------------------------------- ------- --------- --------- Net income as reported $65,337 $42,559 $127,076 $75,301$ 39,395 $41,751 $ 166,471 $ 117,052 Add compensation expense included in net income, net of income taxes 653674 272 1,188 5431,862 815 Deduct total fair value of compensation expense for all awards, net of income taxes (1,115) (942) (2,271) (1,895)(1,136) (870) (3,407) (2,765) --------- ------- ------- -------- ---------------- --------- Pro forma net income $64,875 $41,889 $125,993 $73,949$ 38,933 $41,153 $ 164,926 $ 115,102 Net income per share: As reported - basic $ 1.050.63 $ 0.860.84 $ 2.042.67 $ 1.522.36 Pro forma - basic $ 1.040.62 $ 0.840.83 $ 2.022.65 $ 1.492.32 As reported - diluted $ 1.040.63 $ 0.850.83 $ 2.032.65 $ 1.512.34 Pro forma - diluted $ 1.030.62 $ 0.840.82 $ 2.012.63 $ 1.48 ------- ------- -------- -------2.30
6 2. EARNINGS PER SHARE The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share on income from continuing operations (in(dollars in thousands, except per share information):
THREE MONTHS ENDED SIXNINE MONTHS ENDED JUNESEPTEMBER 30, JUNESEPTEMBER 30, 2004 2003 2004 2003 ----------------------------------------------- -------- -------- -------- Earnings: Income from continuing operations (numerator for basic and diluted calculations) $ 68,390 $43,586 $131,384 $76,746$57,999 $42,224 $189,383 $118,970 Shares: Weighted average outstanding shares (denominator for basic calculation) 62,275 49,741 62,243 49,64662,336 49,793 62,274 49,684 Equivalent shares from outstanding stock options 480 222 480 188 --------535 474 476 259 ------- ------- -------- --------------- Denominator for diluted calculation 62,755 49,963 62,723 49,83462,871 50,267 62,750 49,943 Earnings per share: Basic $ 1.100.93 $ 0.880.85 $ 2.113.04 $ 1.552.39 Diluted $ 1.090.92 $ 0.870.84 $ 2.093.02 $ 1.54 ======== ======= ======== =======2.38 ------- ------- -------- --------
The calculation of equivalent shares from outstanding stock options does not include the impact of options having a strike price that exceeds the average stock price for the earnings period, as the result would be antidilutive. The calculation of equivalent shares also excludes the impact of outstanding performance contingent shares as the conditions necessary for their issuance have not been satisfied as of the end of the reporting period. For the three- and six-monthnine-month periods ended JuneSeptember 30, 2004, all outstanding stock options were included in the calculation of common equivalent shares, while approximately 0.1 million performance contingent shares were excluded from the calculation. For the three and six month periodsmonths ended JuneSeptember 30, 2003, substantially all outstanding stock options were included in the calculation of common equivalent shares. For the nine months ended September 30, 2003, approximately 1.40.8 million of antidilutivein outstanding stock options were not included in the calculation of common equivalent shares. Diluted earnings per share exclude the antidilutive effect of 5.6 million shares that would be issued upon exercise of outstanding warrants to purchase Company common stock, as the Company could repurchase more shares than it could issue with the exercise proceeds. The warrants become dilutive once the Company's average stock price during a reporting period exceeds $39.98 per share. Approximately 0.3 million shares would be included as common stock equivalents if the Company's stock price were to average $42.50 and approximately 0.6 million shares would be included if the stock price were to average $45.00 per share during the period. 3. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME The following schedule reflects the change in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the three- and six-monthnine-month periods ended JuneSeptember 30, 2004 and 2003 (dollars in thousands):
--------------------------------------------------------------- THREE MONTHS ENDED SIXNINE MONTHS ENDED JUNESEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 JUNE 30, 2003 JUNE 30, 2004 JUNE 30, 2003 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- Net income $ 65,33739,395 $ 42,55941,751 $ 127,076 $ 75,301166,471 $117,052 Accumulated other comprehensive income (expense)(loss), net of income tax: Unrealized gains (losses), net of reclassification adjustment for gains (losses) included in net income (152,965) 121,683 (95,500) 105,939106,330 (35,410) 10,830 70,529 Foreign currency items (17,287) 26,173 (22,776) 35,87416,166 (3,210) (6,610) 32,664 -------- -------- --------- --------- --------- ----------------- Comprehensive income (loss) $(104,915)$161,891 $ 190,4153,131 $ 8,800 $ 217,114 ========= ========= ========= =========170,691 $220,245 -------- -------- --------- --------
7 4. SEGMENT INFORMATION The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in Note 2 of the 2003 Annual Report. The Company measures segment performance primarily based on profit or loss from operations before income taxes. There are no intersegment reinsurance transactions and the Company does not have any material long-lived assets. Investment income is allocated to the segments based upon average assets and related capital levels deemed appropriate to support the segment business volumes. Information related to total revenues and income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes for each reportable segment are summarized below (dollars in thousands).
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------- THREE MONTHS ENDED SIXNINE MONTHS ENDED JUNESEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 JUNE 30, 2003 JUNE 30, 2004 JUNE 30, 2003 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- REVENUES U.S $ 662,969636,256 $ 476,506468,814 $ 1,313,5331,949,789 $ 927,3121,396,126 Canada 92,167 77,175 177,642 145,19984,323 84,034 261,965 229,233 Europe & South Africa 121,337 84,411 243,681 169,777119,277 94,766 362,958 264,543 Asia Pacific 90,008 69,162 198,264 114,112107,581 60,196 305,845 174,308 Corporate & Other 9,934 7,121 22,517 11,524 -----------12,027 4,692 34,544 16,216 --------- --------- ----------- ----------- Total $ 976,415959,464 $ 714,375712,502 $ 1,955,6372,915,101 $ 1,367,924 ===========2,080,426 ========= ========= =========== =========== INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES U.S $ 75,81072,031 $ 55,76145,303 $ 146,057218,088 $ 98,399143,702 Canada 21,211 13,429 37,131 24,05615,835 19,529 52,966 43,585 Europe & South Africa 11,829 3,902 18,089 6,3119,577 3,098 27,666 9,409 Asia Pacific 4,694 4,527 11,491 5,895(1,406) 6,529 10,085 12,424 Corporate & Other (8,151) (10,610) (12,560) (17,799) -----------(6,931) (11,452) (19,491) (29,251) --------- --------- ----------- ----------- Total $ 105,39389,106 $ 67,00963,007 $ 200,208289,314 $ 116,862 ===========179,869 ========= ========= =========== ===========
Canada, Europe & South Africa and Asia Pacific assets increased approximately $100.9$264.0 million or 20.9%14%, $136.5 million or 28%, and $119.8$197.8 million or 29.0%48%, respectively, from the amounts disclosed in Note 17 of the 2003 Annual Report, primarily due to the continued growth in these segments. 5. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES The Company is currently a party to various litigation and arbitrations that involve its discontinued accident and health business, including medical reinsurance arrangements, personal accident business and(including London market excess of loss business), aviation bodily injury carve-out business and worker's compensation carve-out business. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2004, the ceding companies involved in these disputes have raised claims, or established reserves that may result in claims, that are $91.6in the amount of $5.6 million, which is $4.9 million in excess of the amounts held in reserve by the Company. The Company generally has little information regarding any reserves established by the ceding companies, and it is possible that any such reserves could be increased in the future. The Company believes it has substantial defenses upon which to contest these claims, including but not limited to misrepresentation and breach of contract by direct and indirect ceding companies. In addition, the Company is in the process of auditing ceding companies that have indicated that they anticipate asserting claims in the future against the Company that are $16.6in the amount of $24.1 million, which is $23.7 million in excess of the amounts held in reserve by the Company.Company as of September 30, 2004. Depending upon the audit findings in these cases, they could result in litigation or arbitrations in the future. See Note 21, "Discontinued Operations," in the Company's 2003 Annual Report for more information. 8 During the third quarter of 2004, the Company's discontinued accident and health operations recorded a $24.0 million pre-tax charge related to the negotiated settlement of all disputed claims associated with its largest identified accident and health exposure. Additionally, from time to time, the Company is subject to litigation and arbitration related to its life reinsurance business and to employment-related matters in the normal course of its business. While it is not feasible to predict or determine the ultimate outcome of the pending litigation or arbitrations or provide reasonable ranges of potential losses, it is the opinion of management, after consultation with counsel, that their outcomes, after consideration of the provisions made in the Company's consolidated financial statements, would not have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position. 8 As discussed in the Company's 2003 Annual Report, certain regulations were pending relating to permanently disabled participants of the privatized pension plans administered by Administradoras de Fondos de Jubilaciones y Pensiones ("AFJPs"). Recently, the Argentine government enacted those regulations. The new regulations require permanently disabled AFJP plan participants to elect a programmed withdrawal or an annuity with respect to deferred disability claims at a time when the AFJP fund unit values are significantly inflated. The new regulations are expected to accelerate permanent disability payments from reinsurers;reinsurers, particularly with respect to plan participants that elect programmed withdrawal. The Company cannot predict the percentage of plan participants that will elect programmed withdrawal as opposed to an annuity. Also,In addition, as discussed in the Company's 2003 Annual Report, AFJP claims payments are linked to AFJP fund unit values, which are artificially inflated because of the regulatory intervention of the Argentine government. In view of this fact, coupled with the acceleration of permanent disability payments, during the third quarter the Company has formally notified the AFJP ceding companies that it will no longer make claim payments at rates it considers to be artificially inflated, as it has been doing for some time under a reservation of rights, but rather will pay claims only on the basis of the market value of the underlying AFJP fund units. This formal notification could result in litigation or arbitrations in the future. While it is not feasible to predict or determine the ultimate outcome of any such future litigations or arbitrations or provide reasonable ranges of potential losses, it is the opinion of management, after consultation with counsel, that their outcomes, after consideration of the provisions made in the Company's consolidated financial statements, would not have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position. Additionally, as discussed in the Company's 2003 Annual Report, the Company had placed the Argentine Government on notice of its intent to file an arbitration with respect to alleged violations of the Treaty on Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investments, between the Argentine Republic and the United States of America, dated November 14, 1991 (the "Treaty"). On March 24, 2004, RGA Reinsurance filed a request for arbitration of its dispute relating to these alleged violations pursuant to the Washington Convention of 1965 on the Settlement of Investment Disputes under the auspices of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes of the World Bank. The Company has obtained letters of credit in favor of various affiliated and unaffiliated insurance companies from which the Company assumes business. This allows the ceding company to take statutory reserve credits. The letters of credit issued by banks represent a guarantee of performance under the reinsurance agreements. At JuneSeptember 30, 2004, there were approximately $38.7$34.9 million of outstanding letters of credit in favor of third-party entities. Additionally, the Company utilizes letters of credit to secure reserve credits when it retrocedes business to its offshore subsidiaries, including RGA Americas Reinsurance Company, Ltd. and RGA Reinsurance Company (Barbados) Ltd. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2004, $280.6$305.6 million in letters of credit from various banks were outstanding between the various subsidiaries of the Company. Fees associated with letters of credit are not fixed for periods in excess of one year and are based on the Company's ratings and the general availability of these instruments in the marketplace. RGA has issued guarantees of its subsidiaries' performance for the payment of amounts due under certain credit facilities and reinsurance treaties, whereby if a subsidiary fails to meet an obligation, RGA or one of its other subsidiaries will make a payment to fulfill the obligation. Treaty guarantees are granted to ceding companies in order to provide them additional security, particularly in cases where RGA's subsidiary is relatively new, unrated, or not of a significant size, relative to the ceding company. Liabilities supported by the treaty guarantees, before consideration for any legally offsetting amounts due from the guaranteed party, totaled $242.1$248.3 million as of JuneSeptember 30, 2004 and are reflected on the Company's consolidated balance sheet as future policy benefits. 9 Guarantees related to credit facilities provide additional security to third party banks should a subsidiary fail to make principal and/or interest payments when due. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2004, RGA's exposure related to credit facility guarantees was $51.8$52.7 million, the maximum potential amount under current facility terms. 6. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS The components of net periodic benefit costs were as follows:
------------------------------------------------------ PENSION BENEFITS OTHER BENEFITS FOR THE SIXNINE MONTHS FOR THE SIXNINE MONTHS ENDED JUNESEPTEMBER 30, ENDED JUNESEPTEMBER 30, (in thousands) 2004 2003 2004 2003 -------------------------------------------------------------- -------- ------- ------ DETERMINATION OF NET PERIODIC BENEFIT COST: Service cost $ 8841,370 $ 7371,105 $283 $ 188 $ 157236 Interest cost 631 526 182 152956 789 273 227 Expected return on plan assets (386) (322)(750) (482) -- -- Amortization of prior service cost 18 1522 22 -- -- Amortization of prior actuarial loss 85 71 36 30 -------- --------100 106 53 45 ------- ------- ---- ----- ------- Net periodic benefit cost $ 1,2321,698 $ 1,0271,540 $609 $ 406 $ 339 ======== ======== ===== =======508 ------- ------- ---- -----
The Company paid $2.9 million in pension contributions during the second quarter of 2004 and expects this to be the only contribution for the year. 9 7. NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS In March 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") of the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") reached further consensus on Issue No. 03-1, "The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments" ("EITF 03-1"). EITF 03-1 provides accounting guidance regarding the determination of when an impairment of debt and marketable equity securities and investments accounted for under the cost method should be considered other-than-temporary and recognized in income. An EITF 03-1 consensus reached in DecemberNovember 2003 also requires certain quantitative and qualitative disclosures for debt and marketable equity securities classified as available-for-sale or held-to-maturity under SFAS No. 115, Accounting"Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, that are impaired at the balance sheet date but for which an other-than-temporary impairment has not been recognized." The Company has complied with the disclosure requirements of EITF 03-1 which were effective December 31, 2003. The accounting guidance of EITF 03-1 willrelating to the recognition of investment impairment which was to be effective in the third quarter of 2004 has been delayed pending the development of additional guidance. The Company is actively monitoring the deliberations relating to this issue at the FASB and currently is not expectedunable to havedetermine the impact of EITF 03-1 on its unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements. In conformity with existing generally accepted accounting principles, the Company's gross unrealized losses totaling $27.2 million at September 30, 2004 are reflected as a material impactcomponent of other comprehensive income on the Company's consolidated financial statements.balance sheet. Depending on the ultimate guidance issued by the FASB, including guidance regarding management's assertion about intent and ability to hold available-for-sale investment securities, the Company could be required to report these unrealized losses in a different manner, including possibly reflecting these unrealized losses in the consolidated income statement as other-than-temporary impairments, even if the unrealized losses are attributable solely to interest rate movements. In March 2004, the EITF reached consensuses on Issue No. 03-6, "Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No. 128" ("EITF 03-6"). EITF 03-6 provides guidance in determining whether a security should be considered a participating security for purposes of computing earnings per share and how earnings should be allocated to the participating security. EITF 03-6, which was effective for the Company in the second quarter of 2004, did not have an impact on the Company's earnings per share calculations. In March 2004, the EITF reached consensus on Issue No. 03-16, "Accounting for Investments in Limited Liability Companies" ("EITF 03-16"). EITF 03-16 provides guidance regarding whether a limited liability company should 10 be viewed as similar to a corporation or similar to a partnership for purposes of determining whether a noncontrolling investment should be accounted for using the cost method or the equity method of accounting. EITF 03-16, which will be effective in the third quarter of 2004, isdid not expected to have a material impact on the Company's unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements. In December 2003, the FASB revised SFAS No. 132, "Employers' Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits -- an Amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88 and 106" ("SFAS 132(r)"). SFAS 132(r) retains most of the disclosure requirements of SFAS 132 and requires additional disclosure about assets, obligations, cash flows and net periodic benefit cost of defined benefit pension plans and other defined postretirement plans. SFAS 132(r) was primarily effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2003; however, certain disclosures about foreign plans and estimated future benefit payments are effective for fiscal years ending after June 15, 2004. The Company's adoption of SFAS 132(r) on December 31, 2003 did not have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements since it only revised disclosure requirements. Effective July, 1, 2004, the Company adopted FASB Staff Position ("FSP") No. 106-2, "Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003" ("FSP 106-2"), which provides accounting guidance to a sponsor of a post-retirement health care plan that provides prescription drug benefits. The impact of the Company's application of FSP 106-2 was immaterial. In July 2003, the Accounting Standards Executive Committee issued Statement of Position ("SOP") 03-1, "Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises for Certain Nontraditional Long-Duration Contracts and for Separate Accounts." SOP 03-1 provides guidance on separate account presentation and valuation, the accounting for sales inducements and the classification and valuation of long-duration contract liabilities. The Company adopted the provisions of SOP 03-1 on January 1, 2004, recording a charge of $361 thousand,$0.4 million, net of income taxes. In April 2003, the FASB cleared SFAS No. 133 Implementation Issue No. B36, "Embedded Derivatives: Modified Coinsurance Arrangements and Debt Instruments That Incorporate Credit Risk Exposures That Are Unrelated or Only Partially Related to the Creditworthiness of the Obligor under Those Instruments" ("Issue B36"). Issue B36 concluded that (i) a company's funds withheld payable and/or receivable under certain reinsurance arrangements and (ii) a debt instrument that incorporates credit risk exposures that are unrelated or only partially related to the creditworthiness of the obligor include an embedded derivative feature that is not clearly and closely related to the host contract. Therefore, the embedded derivative feature must be measured at fair value on the balance sheet and changes in fair value reported in income. The Company adopted the provisions of Issue B36 during the fourth quarter of 2003 and recorded a net gain of $0.5 million as a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle. In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB")FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities" ("FIN 46"), an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, "Consolidated Financial Statements," which requires the consolidation by a business enterprise of variable interest entities if the business enterprise is the primary beneficiary. FIN 46 was effective January 31, 2003, for the Company with respect to interests in variable interest entities obtained after that date. With respect to interests in variable interest entities existing prior to February 1, 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003), which extended the effective date of FIN 46 to the period ending March 31, 2004. The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 46 as of March 31, 2004 and is not required to consolidate any material interests in variable interest entities. 8. SIGNIFICANT TRANSACTION During December 2003, the Company completed a large coinsurance agreement with Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America ("Allianz Life"). Under this agreement, RGA Reinsurance assumed the traditional life reinsurance business of Allianz Life, including yearly renewable term reinsurance and coinsurance of term policies. The business assumed does not include any accident and health risk, annuities or related guaranteed minimum death benefits or guaranteed minimum income benefits. This transaction adds additional scale to the Company's U.S. traditional business, but does not significantly add to its client base since most of the underlying ceding companies are already clients. The Company is usingcontinues to make commercially reasonable efforts to novate the underlying treaties from Allianz Life to RGA Reinsurance. Novation results in the underlying client companies reinsuring the business directly to RGA Reinsurance versus passing through Allianz Life. The profitability of the business is not dependent on novation. The transaction was effective retroactive to July 1, 2003. 1011 9. SUBSEQUENT EVENT On October 26, 2004, the Company announced that its board of directors increased the quarterly dividend by 50 percent to $0.09 per share from $0.06 per share, payable to shareholders of record as of November 8, 2004. ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OVERVIEW Our primary business is life reinsurance, which involves reinsuring life insurance policies that are often in force for the remaining lifetime of the underlying individuals insured, with premiums earned typically over a period of 10 to 30 years. Each year, however, a portion of the business under existing treaties terminates due to, among other things, lapses or surrenders of underlying policies, deaths of policyholders, and the exercise of recapture options by ceding companies. We derive revenues primarily from renewal premiums from existing reinsurance treaties, new business premiums from existing or new reinsurance treaties, income earned on invested assets, and fees earned from financial reinsurance transactions. We believe that industry trends have not materially changed from those discussed in our 2003 Annual Report. In addition, our critical accounting policies are substantially the same as those disclosed in our 2003 Annual Report. Our profitability primarily depends on the volume and amount of death claims incurred and our ability to adequately price the risks we assume. While death claims are reasonably predictable over a period of many years, claims become less predictable over shorter periods and are subject to significant fluctuation from quarter to quarter and year to year. Effective July 1, 2003, we increased the maximum amount of coverage that we retain per life from $4 million to $6 million. This increase does not affect business written prior to July 1, 2003. Claims in excess of this retention amount are retroceded to retrocessionaires; however, we remain fully liable to the ceding company, our customer, for the entire amount of risk we assume. The increase in our retention limit from $4 million to $6 million reduces the amount of premiums we pay to our retrocessionaires, but increases the maximum impact a single death claim can have on our results and therefore may result in additional volatility to our results from operations. We believe our sources of liquidity are sufficient to cover the potential increase in claims payments on both a short-term and long-term basis. We measure performance based on income or loss from continuing operations before income taxes for each of our five segments. Our U.S., Canada, Asia Pacific and Europe & South Africa operations provide traditional life reinsurance to their clients. Our U.S. operations also provide asset-intensive and financial reinsurance products. We also provide insurers with critical illness reinsurance in our Canada, Asia Pacific and Europe & South Africa operations. Asia Pacific operations provide a limited amount of financial reinsurance. The Corporate and Other segment results include the corporate investment activity, general corporate expenses, interest expense of RGA, Argentine privatized pension business in run-off and the provision for income taxes. Our discontinued accident and health operations are not reflected in our results from continuing operations. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Consolidated income from continuing operations before income taxes increased $38.4$26.1 million, or 57.3%41%, and $83.3$109.4 million, or 71.3%61%, for the secondthird quarter and first sixnine months of 2004, respectively, primarily due to higher revenue levels, including net capital gains on investment transactions. Our coinsurance agreement with Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America ("Allianz Life"), signed in December 2003 and effective as of July 1, 2003, continued to provide positive results concurrent with growth in life reinsurance premiums in all of our operating segments. Consolidated premiums increased $214.7$246.5 million, or 36.9%43%, and $483.4$729.9 million, or 42.9%43%, during the secondthird quarter and first sixnine months of 2004, respectively. The Allianz Life transaction contributed $121.1$122.3 million of this increase during the secondthird quarter and $239.6$361.9 for the first sixnine months of 2004. Consolidated investment income, net of related expenses, increased $18.2$22.4 million, or 15.7%18%, and $44.7$67.1 million, or 20%19%, during the secondthird quarter and first sixnine months of 2004, respectively, primarily due to a larger invested asset base. Invested assets as of JuneSeptember 30, 2004 totaled $9.4$10.0 billion, a 23.1%29% increase over JuneSeptember 30, 2003. While our invested asset base has grown significantly since JuneSeptember 30, 2003, the average yield earned on investments excluding funds withheld decreased from 6.67%6.59% during the secondthird quarter of 2003 to 5.79%6.03% for the secondthird 12 quarter of 2004. The decreasing yield is the result of the Company investing proceeds from operations and investing activities in a lower interest rate environment. The average yield will vary from quarter to quarter and year to year depending on a number of variables, including the prevailing interest rate and credit spread environment and changes in the mix of our underlying investments. Investment income isand a portion of realized gains (losses) are allocated to the segments based upon average assets and related capital levels deemed appropriate to support the segment business volumes. 11 EffectiveThe effective tax ratesrate on a consolidated basis was 34.9% for the secondthird quarter and 34.5% for the first nine months of 2004, compared to 33.0% and 33.9% for the comparable prior-year periods. The lower rates in the prior-year periods were due to the release of valuation allowances on certain foreign subsidiaries. CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES Our accounting policies are described in Note 2 in the 2003 were 35.1%Annual Report. We believe our most critical accounting policies include the capitalization and 35.0%, respectively.amortization of deferred acquisition costs; the establishment of liabilities for future policy benefits, other policy claims and benefits, including incurred but not reported claims; the valuation of investment impairments; and the establishment of arbitration or litigation reserves. The balances of these accounts are significant to our financial position and require extensive use of assumptions and estimates, particularly related to the future performance of the underlying business. Costs of acquiring new business, which vary with and are primarily related to the production of new business, have been deferred to the extent that such costs are deemed recoverable from future premiums or gross profits. Deferred policy acquisition costs ("DAC") reflect our expectations about the future experience of the business in force and include commissions and allowances as well as certain costs of policy issuance and underwriting. Some of the factors that can affect the carrying value of DAC include mortality assumptions, interest spreads and policy lapse rates. We perform periodic tests to determine that DAC remains recoverable, and the cumulative amortization is re-estimated and, if necessary, adjusted by a cumulative charge or credit to current operations. Liabilities for future policy benefits under long-term life insurance policies (policy reserves) are computed based upon expected investment yields, mortality and withdrawal (lapse) rates, and other assumptions, including a provision for adverse deviation from expected claim levels. We primarily rely on our own valuation and administration systems to establish policy reserves. The policy reserves we establish may differ from those established by our ceding companies (clients) due to the use of different mortality and other assumptions. However, we rely on our clients to provide accurate data, including policy-level information, premiums and claims, which is the primary information used to establish reserves. Our administration departments work directly with our clients to help ensure information is submitted by them in accordance with the reinsurance contracts. Additionally, we perform periodic audits of the information provided by ceding companies. We establish reserves for processing backlogs with a goal of clearing all backlogs within a ninety-day period. The backlogs are usually due to data errors we discover or computer file compatibility issues, since much of the data reported to us is in electronic format and is uploaded to our computer systems. We continually review actual historical experience and relative anticipated experience compared to the assumptions used to establish policy reserves. Further, we establish premium deficiency reserves if actual and anticipated experience indicates that existing policy reserves together with the present value of future gross premiums are not sufficient to cover the present value of future benefits, settlement and maintenance costs and to recover unamortized acquisition costs. The premium deficiency reserve is established along with a charge to income, as well as a reduction to unamortized acquisition costs and, to the extent there are no unamortized acquisition costs, an increase to future policy benefits. Because of the many assumptions and estimates used in establishing reserves and the long-term nature of our reinsurance contracts, the reserving process, while based on actuarial science, is inherently uncertain. If our assumptions, particularly on mortality, are not correct, our reserves may not be adequate to pay claims and there could be a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. Other policy claims and benefits include claims payable for incurred but not reported losses, which are determined using case basis estimates and lag studies of past experience. These estimates are periodically reviewed and any adjustments to such estimates, if necessary, are reflected in current operations. The time lag from the date of the claim or death to the date when the ceding company reports the claim to us can vary significantly by ceding company and business segment, but generally averages around 2.5 months on a consolidated basis. We update our 13 analysis of incurred but not reported claims, including lag studies, on a quarterly basis and adjust our claim liabilities accordingly. The adjustments in a given period are generally not significant relative to the overall policy liabilities and may result in an increase or decrease in liabilities. We primarily invest in fixed maturity securities. We monitor our fixed maturity securities to determine potential impairments in value. In conjunction with our external investment managers, we evaluate factors such as the financial condition of the issuer, payment performance, the extent to which the market value has been below amortized cost, compliance with covenants, general market and industry sector conditions, the intent and ability to hold securities, and various other subjective factors. Securities, based on management's judgments, with an other-than-temporary impairment in value are written down to management's estimate of fair value. Differences in actual experience compared with the assumptions and estimates utilized in the justification of the recoverability of DAC, in establishing reserves for future policy benefits and claim liabilities, or in the determination of other-than-temporary impairments to investment securities can have a material effect on our results of operations and financial condition. Further discussion and analysis of the results for 2004 compared to 2003 are presented by segment. Certain prior-year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current-year presentation. References to income before income taxes exclude the effects of discontinued operations and the cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles. 14 U.S. OPERATIONS U.S. operations consist of two major sub-segments: Traditional and Non-Traditional. The Traditional sub-segment primarily specializes in mortality-risk reinsurance. The Non-traditional category consists of Asset-Intensive and Financial Reinsurance. FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNESEPTEMBER 30, 2004 (IN THOUSANDS)
-------------------------------------------------- NON-TRADITIONAL ASSET- FINANCIAL TOTAL TRADITIONAL INTENSIVE REINSURANCE U.S. ------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ------------- REVENUES: Net premiums $ 530,129538,524 $ 1,1901,227 $ -- $ 531,319539,751 Investment income, net of related expenses 53,974 47,495 72 101,54153,305 53,134 14 106,453 Realized investment gains (losses),losses, net 3,662 (821)(840) (966) -- 2,841(1,806) Change in value of embedded derivatives -- 17,472(18,610) -- 17,472(18,610) Other revenues 931 1,907 6,958 9,796928 2,644 6,896 10,468 ----------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------------------- Total revenues 588,696 67,243 7,030 662,969591,917 37,429 6,910 636,256 BENEFITS AND EXPENSES: Claims and other policy benefits 429,423 3,246 -- 432,669412,021 7,831 2 419,854 Interest credited 12,117 31,70412,073 34,652 -- 43,82146,725 Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses 72,714 8,484 2,280 83,47887,121 7,201 2,349 96,671 Change in deferred acquisition costs associated with change in value of embedded derivatives -- 13,293(13,209) -- 13,293(13,209) Other operating expenses 11,341 1,028 1,529 13,89811,695 1,295 1,194 14,184 ----------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------------------- Total benefits and expenses 525,595 57,755 3,809 587,159522,910 37,770 3,545 564,225 Income (loss) before income taxes $ 63,10169,007 $ 9,488(341) $ 3,2213,365 $ 75,81072,031 =========== =========== ========== ========== ========== =======================
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNESEPTEMBER 30, 2003 (IN THOUSANDS)
-------------------------------------------------- NON-TRADITIONAL ASSET- FINANCIAL TOTAL TRADITIONAL INTENSIVE REINSURANCE U.S. ------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ------------- REVENUES: Net premiums $ 378,382368,171 $ 1,0061,093 $ --- $ 379,388369,264 Investment income, net of related expenses 45,175 42,204 -- 87,37947,370 44,385 97 91,852 Realized investment gains (losses),losses, net (714) 1,148 -- 434(1,059) (367) - (1,426) Other revenues 884 1,766 6,655 9,305 ---------- ---------- ----------- ----------489 2,022 6,613 9,124 --------- -------- ------ --------- Total revenues 423,727 46,124 6,655 476,506414,971 47,133 6,710 468,814 BENEFITS AND EXPENSES: Claims and other policy benefits 297,525 1,771 -- 299,296297,654 776 - 298,430 Interest credited 14,931 28,580 -- 43,51114,919 30,703 - 45,622 Policy acquisition costs and other insurance 56,714 8,003 2,721 67,438 expenses 56,738 10,861 2,206 69,805 Other operating expenses 8,484 826 1,190 10,500 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------7,515 891 1,248 9,654 --------- -------- ------ --------- Total benefits and expenses 377,654 39,180 3,911 420,745376,826 43,231 3,454 423,511 Income before income taxes $ 46,07338,145 $ 6,9443,902 $3,256 $ 2,744 $ 55,761 ==========45,303 ========= ========== ================== ====== =========
1215 FOR THE SIXNINE MONTHS ENDED JUNESEPTEMBER 30, 2004 (IN THOUSANDS)
-------------------------------------------------- NON-TRADITIONAL ASSET- FINANCIAL TOTAL TRADITIONAL INTENSIVE REINSURANCE U.S. ------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ------------- REVENUES: Net premiums $ 1,061,3401,599,864 $ 2,3723,599 $ -- $1,063,712$ 1,603,463 Investment income, net of related expenses 108,027 92,962 115 201,104161,332 146,096 129 307,557 Realized investment gains (losses), net 11,220 (677)10,380 (1,643) -- 10,5438,737 Change in value of embedded derivatives -- 18,994384 -- 18,994384 Other revenues 2,265 3,577 13,338 19,1803,193 6,221 20,234 29,648 ----------- ---------- ---------- --------------------- ----------- ------------- Total revenues 1,182,852 117,228 13,453 1,313,5331,774,769 154,657 20,363 1,949,789 BENEFITS AND EXPENSES: Claims and other policy benefits 860,314 2,225 -- 862,5391,272,335 10,056 2 1,282,393 Interest credited 24,195 66,19836,268 100,850 -- 90,393137,118 Policy acquisition costs and other insurance 148,145 16,129 4,574 168,848 expenses 235,266 23,330 6,923 265,519 Change in deferred acquisition costs associated with change in value of embedded derivatives -- 17,4934,284 -- 17,4934,284 Other operating expenses 23,065 2,187 2,951 28,20334,760 3,482 4,145 42,387 ----------- ---------- ---------- --------------------- ----------- ------------- Total benefits and expenses 1,055,719 104,232 7,525 1,167,4761,578,629 142,002 11,070 1,731,701 Income before income taxes $ 127,133196,140 $ 12,99612,655 $ 5,9289,293 $ 146,057218,088 =========== ========== ========== ===================== =========== =============
FOR THE SIXNINE MONTHS ENDED JUNESEPTEMBER 30, 2003 (IN THOUSANDS)
-------------------------------------------------- NON-TRADITIONAL ASSET- FINANCIAL TOTAL TRADITIONAL INTENSIVE REINSURANCE U.S. ------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ------------- REVENUES: Net premiums $ 747,1891,115,360 $ 2,1043,197 $ --- $ 749,2931,118,557 Investment income, net of related expenses 87,876 78,538 -- 166,414135,246 122,923 97 258,266 Realized investment losses, net (5,958) (1,713) -- (7,671)(7,017) (2,080) - (9,097) Other revenues 2,697 3,013 13,566 19,276 ---------- --------- ---------- ----------3,186 5,035 20,179 28,400 ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------- Total revenues 831,804 81,942 13,566 927,3121,246,775 129,075 20,276 1,396,126 BENEFITS AND EXPENSES: Claims and other policy benefits 591,251 3,390 -- 594,641888,905 4,166 - 893,071 Interest credited 30,250 53,721 -- 83,97145,169 84,424 - 129,593 Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses 107,519 16,031 5,241 128,791164,257 26,892 7,447 198,596 Other operating expenses 16,939 1,938 2,633 21,510 ---------- --------- ---------- ----------24,454 2,829 3,881 31,164 ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------- Total benefits and expenses 745,959 75,080 7,874 828,9131,122,785 118,311 11,328 1,252,424 Income before income taxes $ 85,845123,990 $ 6,86210,764 $ 5,6928,948 $ 98,399 ========== ========= ========== ==========143,702 =========== =========== =========== =============
Income before income taxes for the U.S. Operations segment totaled $75.8$72.0 million and $146.1$218.1 million for the secondthird quarter and first sixnine months of 2004, increases of 36.0%59.0% and 48.4%51.8% from the comparable prior-year periods. The increase in income can befor the first nine months was attributed to higher revenue levels and net capital gains on investment transactions fortransactions. Current period results also include the current-year periods.large Allianz coinsurance transaction that was completed in the fourth quarter of 2003. Improved mortality experience, in the traditional sub-segment, primarily in the third quarter also contributed to the increase in income. Traditional Reinsurance The U.S. traditional sub-segment provides life reinsurance to domestic clients for a variety of life products through yearly renewable term agreements, coinsurance, and modified coinsurance arrangements. These reinsurance arrangements may be either facultative or automatic agreements. During the secondthird quarter and first sixnine months of 16 2004, this sub-segment added $51.7$39.3 billion and $95.9$135.2 billion face amount of new business compared to $39.5$29.7 billion 13 and $66.0$95.8 billion for the same periods in 2003. Total assumed reinsurance in force, as measured by policy face amount, totaled $965.3$990.3 billion, an increase of 65.2% over the total at JuneSeptember 30, 2003. The Allianz Life transaction, completed in the fourth quarter of 2003, contributed 50.4%$297.6 billion of the increase for the comparable periods. Management believes life insurance industry consolidations and the trend towards reinsuring mortality risks should continue to provide opportunities for growth, although transactions the size of Allianz Life may or may not occur. Income before income taxes for U.S. traditional reinsurance increased $ 17.0$30.9 million, or 37.0%80.9%, and $ 41.3$72.2 million, or 48.1%58.2%, in the secondthird quarter and first sixnine months of 2004, respectively. This increase for the comparable periods was driven by growth in net premiums, including the Allianz transaction, and net realized investment gains somewhat offset by higherand improved mortality experience during the third quarter of 2004. Net premiums for U.S. traditional reinsurance increased 40.1%46.3% and 42.0%43.4% or $170.3 million and $484.5 million for the secondthird quarter and first sixnine months of 2004, respectively. The increaseincreases for comparablethe 2004 periods waswere primarily attributeddue to the Allianz transaction, which contributed 32.0%$122.3 million and 32.1%$361.9 million, respectively, of the increaseincreases for the comparable periods. New premiums from facultative and automatic treaties and renewal premiums on existing blocks of business also contributed to the growth. Net investment income increased 19.5%12.5% and 22.9%19.3% or $5.9 million and $26.1 million for the secondthird quarter and first sixnine months of 2004, respectively. The increase is due to growth in the invested asset base, primarily due to the Allianz Life transaction, and increased cash flows from operating activities on traditional reinsurance. Loss ratios (claims and other policy benefits divided by net premiums) were 81.0%76.5% and 81.1%79.5% during the secondthird quarter and first sixnine months, respectively, compared to 78.6%80.8% and 79.1%79.7% for the same periods in 2003. The increasedecrease in the loss ratiosratio for the comparable periodsthird quarter is the result of somewhat higher claims experience in 2004 compared to favorable claimsimproved claim experience in the first and second quarter of 2003.current quarter. Management believes death claims are reasonably predictable over a period of many years, but are less predictable over shorter periods and are subject to significant fluctuation. Interest credited relates to amounts credited on the Company's cash value products in this sub-segment, which have a significant mortality component. This amount fluctuates with the changes in deposit levels, cash surrender values and investment performance. As a percentage of net premiums, policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses were 13.7%16.2% and 14.0%14.7% for the secondthird quarter and first sixnine months of 2004, respectively, compared to 15.0%15.4% and 14.4%14.7% for the same periods in 2003. These percentages will fluctuate due to varying allowance levels within coinsurance-type arrangements and the amortization pattern of previously capitalized amounts, which are based on the form of reinsurance agreement and the underlying insurance polices. Additionally, the mix of first year coinsurance versus yearly renewable term can cause the percentage to fluctuate from period to period. Other operating expenses increased $4.2 million, or 56%, in the third quarter of 2004 and $10.3 million, or 42%, in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2004. The increases are commensurate with the growth in business volume and net premiums, including growth from the Allianz transaction. As a percentage of net premiums, other operating expenses remained relatively level at 2.17% for both the third quarter and first nine months of 2004, compared to 2.04% and 2.19% for the same periods in 2003. Asset-Intensive Reinsurance The U.S. asset-intensive sub-segment concentrates on the investment risk within underlying annuities and corporate-owned life insurance policies. Most of these agreements are coinsurance or modified coinsurance of non-mortality risks such that the Company recognizes profit or losses primarily from the spread between the investment earnings and interest credited on the underlying deposit liabilities. SeveralAs of September 30, 2004, two of the coinsurance agreements areremain on a funds withheld at interest basis. In the third quarter of 2004, two annuity treaties, from one ceding company, were converted from a funds withheld at interest agreement to a coinsurance agreement. The conversion resulted in a transfer of assets, primarily fixed maturity securities, from the ceding company to RGA. As of September 30, 2004, these assets had a reported value of approximately $709.7 million. Income (loss) before income taxes for the secondthird quarter and first sixnine months of 2004 was $9.5$(0.3) million and $13.0$12.7 million, respectively, compared to $6.9$3.9 million and $10.8 million for both comparable prior-year periods in 2003. Contributing17 The decrease for the current quarter compared to the increase forprior period is almost entirely related to the comparable periods was the continued growthdecline in annuity business coupled with the change in the fair market value of embedded derivatives. The fair market value of the embedded derivatives can fluctuate significantly due primarily to changes in credit spreads. Year-to-date the increase in income from the prior period can be attributed to the continued growth in the asset base for annuity business. The average asset base supporting this segment grew from $2.6$2.7 billion in the secondthird quarter of 2003 to $3.2$3.3 billion for the same quarter in 2004. The growth in the asset base was primarily driven by new business written on existing annuity treaties. Invested assets outstanding as of JuneSeptember 30, 2004 and 2003 were $3.3$3.5 billion and $2.9$3.0 billion, of which $2.2$1.7 billion and $1.7$1.8 billion were funds withheld at interest, respectively. The change in value of embedded derivatives was largely offset by the associated change in deferred acquisition costs. Total revenues, which are comprised primarily of investment income, were $67.2$37.4 million and $117.2$154.7 million in the secondthird quarter and first sixnine months of 2004, respectively, compared to $46.1$47.1 million and $81.9$129.1 million for the comparable prior-year periods. This growthThe decrease in revenues for the third quarter compared to the prior year third quarter is primarily due to the decline in fair value of embedded derivatives. Growth in revenue for the first nine months of 2004 compared to the prior year is primarily the result of the increase in the average asset base for the comparable periods and the change in the fair value of embedded derivatives. 14 as discussed above. Total expenses, which are comprised primarily of interest credited, policy benefits and acquisition costs, were $57.8$37.8 million and $104.2$142.0 million for secondthird quarter and first sixnine months in 2004, respectively, compared to $39.2$43.2 million and $75.1$118.3 million in the prior-year periods. The increasedecrease in expenses was attributedfor the third quarter compared to the prior year period is primarily due to the change in deferred acquisition costs associated with the change in value of embedded derivatives. Further,The increase in expenses for the first nine months of 2004 compared to the same prior-year period was primarily related to an increase in interest credited, which is generally offset by the increase in investment income, was thea result of the growth in the asset base supporting this segment. Financial Reinsurance The U.S. financial reinsurance sub-segment includes net fees earned on financial reinsurance agreements. Financial reinsurance agreements represent low risk business that the Company structures for its third party clients. Generally, the Company assumes and generally subsequently retrocedes withlow-risk business and earns a net fee, earnedwhich is based on the transaction.financial reinsurance outstanding, as measured by pre-tax statutory surplus relief provided. The fees earned from the assumption of financial reinsurance contracts are reflected in other revenues, and the fees paid to retrocessionaires are reflected in policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses. Income before income taxes totaled $3.2$3.4 million and $5.9$9.3 million in the secondthird quarter and first sixnine months of 2004, respectively, compared to $2.7$3.3 million and $5.7$8.9 million for the same periods in 2003. The increase for the first nine months of the year was attributed to growth in net fees somewhat offset by higher operating expenses. At JuneSeptember 30, 2004 and 2003, financial reinsurance outstanding as measured by pre-tax statutory surplus, was $1.2$1.3 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively. 18 CANADA OPERATIONS The Company conducts reinsurance business in Canada through RGA Life Reinsurance Company of Canada ("RGA Canada"), a wholly-owned company. RGA Canada is a leading life reinsurer in Canada, assisting clients with capital management activity and mortality risk management, and is primarily engaged in traditional individual life reinsurance, as well as non-guaranteed critical illness products.
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED FOR THE SIXNINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 30, (in thousands) JUNE 30, 2004 JUNE 30, 2003 JUNE 30, 2004 JUNE 30, 2003 ------------ ------------- ------------- ------------- REVENUES: Net premiums $ 61,83059,231 $53,144 $181,209 $ 52,017 $ 121,978 $ 100,603153,747 Investment income, net of related expenses 23,437 21,509 47,417 41,27525,142 22,244 72,559 63,519 Realized investment gains (losses), net 6,869 3,825 8,178 3,562(19) 8,596 8,159 12,158 Other revenues 31 (176) 69 (241) --------- --------- ---------(31) 50 38 (191) -------- ------- -------- --------- Total revenues 92,167 77,175 177,642 145,19984,323 84,034 261,965 229,233 BENEFITS AND EXPENSES: Claims and other policy benefits 59,499 56,149 118,865 105,27959,568 56,132 178,433 161,411 Interest credited 418 264 795 553530 536 1,325 1,089 Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses 8,278 4,864 15,361 10,4575,672 5,257 21,033 15,714 Other operating expenses 2,761 2,469 5,490 4,854 --------- --------- ---------2,718 2,580 8,208 7,434 -------- ------- -------- --------- Total benefits and expenses 70,956 63,746 140,511 121,14368,488 64,505 208,999 185,648 Income before income taxes $ 21,21115,835 $19,529 $ 13,42952,966 $ 37,131 $ 24,056 ========= ========= =========43,585 ======== ======= ======== =========
Income before income taxes increased $7.8decreased $3.7 million, or 57.9%18.9%, and $13.1increased $9.4 million, or 54.4%21.5%, in the secondthird quarter and first sixnine months of 2004, respectively. The increasesdecrease in the third quarter of 2004 werewas primarily related to a decrease in the realized investment gains of $8.6 million, offset by better than expected mortality experience. The increase in the first nine months of 2004 was primarily related to better than expected mortality experience and increasesoffset by a decrease in realized investment gains of $3.0 million and $4.6 million in the second quarter and first six months, respectively.$4.0 million. Additionally, a stronger Canadian dollar versus the U.S. dollar contributed $0.4$0.7 million and $2.0$2.7 million in the secondthird quarter and first sixnine months, respectively, to income before income taxes. Net premiums increased $9.8$6.1 million, or 18.9%11.5%, and $21.4$27.5 million, or 21.2%17.9%, in the secondthird quarter and first sixnine months of 2004, respectively. A stronger Canadian dollar during 2004 contributed $1.9$2.9 million and $9.5$12.4 million in the secondthird quarter and first sixnine months, respectively, to net premiums reported during 2004. Premium levels are 15 significantly influenced by large transactions, mix of business, and reporting practices of ceding companies and, therefore, can fluctuate from period to period. Net investment income increased 9.0%$2.9 million, or 13.0%, and 14.9%$9.0 million, or 14.2%, in the secondthird quarter and first sixnine months of 2004, respectively. Investment performance varies with the composition of investments. In 2004, the increase was due to an increase in the invested asset base and the strengthening of the foreign exchange rate, the latter of which contributed $0.6$1.3 million and $3.5$4.7 million in the secondthird quarter and first sixnine months of 2004, respectively. The invested asset base growth is due to higher positive operating cash flows on traditional reinsurance and interest on an increasing amount of funds withheld at interest related to one treaty.reinsurance. Loss ratios for this segment were 96.2%101.0% and 97.4%98.5% in the secondthird quarter and first sixnine months of 2004, respectively, compared to 107.9%105.6% and 104.6%105.0% in the comparable prior-year periods. Lower loss ratios for the current periods are primarily due to better mortality experience compared to the prior-year periods. Historical loss ratios for this segment have generally exceeded 100% primarily as a result of several large inforcein force blocks assumed in 1998 and 1997. These blocks are mature blocks of level premium business where loss ratios are expected to increase over time as thebusiness. The Company is required to investinvests the amounts received in excess of mortality costs to fund claims in future years.years, and so loss ratios are expected to increase over time in 19 normal fashion. Claims and other policy benefits as a percentage of net premiums and investment income were 69.8%70.6% and 70.2%70.3% in the secondthird quarter and first sixnine months of 2004, respectively, compared to 76.4%74.5% and 74.2%74.3% in the prior-year periods. Management believes death claims are reasonably predictable over a period of many years, but are less predictable over shorter periods and are subject to significant fluctuation. Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses as a percentage of net premiums totaled 13.4%9.6% and 12.6%11.6% in the secondthird quarter and first sixnine months of 2004, respectively, compared to 9.4%9.9% and 10.4%10.2% in the prior-year periods. Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses as a percentage of net premiums vary from period to period primarily due to the mix of business in the segment. EUROPE & SOUTH AFRICA OPERATIONS The Europe & South Africa segment writes business in Europe (primarily in the United Kingdom and Spain), India and South Africa. This segment provides life reinsurance for a variety of products through yearly renewable term and coinsurance agreements, and reinsurance of accelerated critical illness coverage (pays on the earlier of death or diagnosis of a pre-defined critical illness). Reinsurance agreements may be either facultative or automatic agreements covering primarily individual risks and in some markets, group risks.
-------------------------------------------------------------------- FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED FOR THE SIXNINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 30, (in thousands) JUNE 30, 2004 JUNE 30, 2003 JUNE 30, 2004 JUNE 30, 2003 --------------------------------------------------------------------- --- ---------- ---- ---- ---- ---- REVENUES: Net premiums $118,887$116,873 $ 83,450 $236,090 $167,32792,502 $352,963 $259,829 Investment income, net of related expenses 863 639 2,407 1,4791,390 1,329 3,797 2,808 Realized investment gains, net 1,143 23 4,302 848341 1,040 4,643 1,888 Other revenues 444 299 882 123673 (105) 1,555 18 -------- -------- -------- -------- Total revenues 121,337 84,411 243,681 169,777119,277 94,766 362,958 264,543 BENEFITS AND EXPENSES: Claims and other policy benefits 73,809 47,450 155,806 101,23376,089 60,435 231,895 161,668 Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses 29,842 28,689 58,873 54,22327,752 27,293 86,625 81,516 Other operating expenses 5,524 4,106 10,206 7,5465,480 3,682 15,686 11,228 Interest expense 333 264 707 464379 258 1,086 722 -------- -------- -------- -------- Total benefits and expenses 109,508 80,509 225,592 163,466109,700 91,668 335,292 255,134 Income before income taxes $ 11,8299,577 $ 3,9023,098 $ 18,08927,666 $ 6,3119,409 ======== ======== ======== ========
16 Income before income taxes increased from $3.1 million to $9.6 million during the secondthird quarter of 2004, compared to 2003 increased 203.2%and from $3.9$9.4 million to $11.8$27.7 million for the first nine months of 2004. These increases were driven by a 42.5% growth in premiums from $83.5$92.5 million in the third quarter of 2003 to $118.9$116.9 million during the third quarter of 2004, and higherfrom $259.8 million for the first nine months in 2003 to $353.0 million for the first nine months of 2004. Additionally in 2004, favorable mortality and morbidity experience and an increase in realized investment gains. Forgains of $2.8 million during the sixfirst nine months ended June 30,of 2004 contributed to the improved income from continuing operations before income taxes grew from $6.3 million to $18.1 million, primarily attributable to a 41.1% increase in premiums from $167.3 million to $236.1 million and higher realized investment gains. In addition, strengtheningtaxes. Strengthening foreign currencies contributed $0.9$1.3 million and $1.5$2.7 million to income from continuing operations before income taxes for the secondthird quarter and the first sixnine months of 2004, respectively. Net premiums increased 42.5%$24.4 million, or 26.3%, and 41.1%$93.1 million, or 35.9%, in the secondthird quarter and first sixnine months of 2004, respectively. This was primarilyThese increases were due to new businessfirst year premiums from new treaties and renewal premiums from existing treaties, combined with favorable currency exchange rates. Several foreign currencies, particularly the British pound, the euro, and the South African rand, were stronger against the U.S. dollar in the 2004 periods compared to 2003. Stronger local currencies contributed approximately $11.5$13.4 million and $28.8$42.3 million to net premiums for the secondthird quarter and first sixnine months of 2004, respectively. Also, aA portion of the growth in 20 premiums was also due to reinsurance of accelerated critical illness. This coverage provides a benefit in the event of a death from or the diagnosis of a defined critical illness. Premiums earned during the secondthird quarter and first sixnine months of 2004 associated with critical illness coverage totaled $41.2 million and $86.9$128.0 million, respectively, compared to $31.6$36.7 million and $70.2$106.9 million in the prior-year periods. Premium levels are significantly influenced by large transactions and reporting practices of ceding companies and therefore can fluctuate from period to period. Net investment income increased by $0.2 million in the second quarter of 2004 and $0.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 due to growth in the investment assets in the United Kingdom and South Africa, growth in the allocated invested asset base, and favorable exchange rates. Investment performance varies with the composition of investments and the relative allocation of capital to the operating segments. Loss ratios were 62.1%65.1% and 66.0%65.7% in the secondthird quarter and first sixnine months of 2004, respectively, compared to 56.9%65.3% and 60.5%62.2% in the prior-year periods. This ratio will fluctuate due to variations in the mixture and materiality of business being reinsured and the timing of client company reporting. Death claims are reasonably predictable over a period of many years, but are less predictable over shorter periods and are subject to significant fluctuation. In addition, in 2004, there was a decrease in the mixture of business to the total segment that related to treaties in the United Kingdom that carry a high percentage of policy acquisition costs to premiums. Accordingly, this variation in the mixture of business in 2004 caused the loss ratio to slightly increase and caused the policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses as a percentage of net premiums to slightly decrease. Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses as a percentage of net premiums totaled 25.1%23.8% and 24.9%24.5% for the secondthird quarter and first sixnine months of 2004, respectively, compared to 34.4%29.5% and 32.4%31.4% in the prior-year periods. These percentages fluctuate due to variations in the mixture of business being reinsured and the relative maturity of the business. In addition, as the segment grows, renewal premiums, which have lower allowances than first year premiums, represent a greater percentage of the total premiums. Accordingly, the ratio of allowances to premiums declines. Policy acquisition costs are capitalized and charged to expense in proportion to premium revenue recognized. Acquisition costs, as a percentage of premiums, associated with some treaties in the United Kingdom are typically higher than those experienced in the Company's other segments. Future recoverability of the capitalized policy acquisition costs on this business is primarily sensitive to mortality and morbidity experience. If actual experience suggests higher mortality and morbidity rates going forward than currently contemplated in management's estimates, the Company may record a charge to income, due to a reduction in deferred acquisition costs and, to the extent there are no unamortized acquisition costs, an increase in future policy benefits. No such changes were necessary during the periods presented. Other operating expenses, as a percentage of net premiums were 4.6%4.7% and 4.3%4.4% for the secondthird quarter and first sixnine months of 2004, respectively, compared to 4.9%4.0% and 4.5%4.3% in the prior-year periods. The Company believes that sustained growthincrease in expenses as a percentage of premiums should lessen the burden of start-up expensesreflects an increase in costs associated with supporting higher business volumes in new and expansion costs over time.existing markets. Interest expense increased in 2004 over 2003 due to higher interest rates, an increase in debt levels in the United Kingdom to support the growth in operations, and the effect of foreign exchange rates increasing against the U.S. dollar over the prior year. ASIA PACIFIC OPERATIONS The Asia Pacific segment writes business primarily in Australia, Hong Kong, Japan, Malaysia, New Zealand, South Korea and Taiwan. The principal types of reinsurance for this segment include life, critical care and illness, 17 disability income, superannuation, and financial reinsurance. Superannuation is the Australian government mandated compulsory retirement savings program. Superannuation funds accumulate retirement funds for employees, and in addition, offer life and disability insurance coverage. Reinsurance agreements may be either facultative or automatic agreements covering primarily individual risks and in some markets, group risks. The Company operates multiple offices throughout each region to best meet the needs of the local client companies. 21
---------------------------------------------------------------- FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED FOR THE SIXNINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 30, (in thousands) JUNE 30, 2004 JUNE 30, 2003 JUNE 30, 2004 JUNE 30, 2003 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- REVENUES: Net premiums $ 84,178103,362 $ 66,16557,261 $291,079 $ 187,717 $ 108,575165,836 Investment income, net of related expenses 3,029 2,421 6,764 5,1484,398 3,050 11,162 8,198 Realized investment gains (losses), net (149) (131) 198 (518)244 (104) 442 (622) Other revenues 2,950 707 3,585 907(423) (11) 3,162 896 --------- --------- ----------------- -------- --------- Total revenues 90,008 69,162 198,264 114,112107,581 60,196 305,845 174,308 BENEFITS AND EXPENSES: Claims and other policy benefits 67,380 47,190 142,225 74,45484,611 41,101 226,836 115,555 Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses 11,878 13,006 33,408 24,52817,514 8,873 50,922 33,401 Other operating expenses 5,673 4,189 10,415 8,7166,478 3,370 16,893 12,086 Interest expense 383 250 725 519384 323 1,109 842 --------- --------- ----------------- -------- --------- Total benefits and expenses 85,314 64,635 186,773 108,217108,987 53,667 295,760 161,884 Income (loss) before income taxes $ 4,694(1,406) $ 4,5276,529 $ 11,49110,085 $ 5,895 --------- --------- --------- ---------12,424 ========= ======== ======== =========
Income before income taxes increased from $4.5 million to $4.7was $(1.4) million during the secondthird quarter of 2004 as compared to $6.5 million during the third quarter of 2003, and from $5.9 million to $11.5$10.1 million for the first sixnine months of 2004.2004 as compared to $12.4 million for the first nine months of 2003. Strengthening foreign currencies contributed $0.4increased the segment's loss before income taxes by $1.1 million and $1.0 million tofor the third quarter of 2004. The effect of changes in foreign currencies on income before income taxes for the second quarter and first sixnine months ofending September 30, 2004 respectively. While thewas not significant. The Asia Pacific segment did experience 27.2%81% growth in net premiums from $66.2 million to $84.2for the quarter, reaching $103.3 million during the secondthird quarter of 2004 as compared to $57.3 million during the third quarter of 2003, and a 72.9%75.5% growth in net premiums from $108.6year-to-date, reaching $291.1 million to $187.7 million forduring the first sixnine months of 2004 as compared to $165.8 million during the first nine months of 2003. However, increased loss ratios prevented an equivalent percentage growth in income before income taxes for the respective periods. The percentage growth in net premiums for the six-monthnine-month comparable periods is not necessarily indicative of the percentages the Company expects for the year ending December 31, 2004. As the comparable net premium base grows, this percentage is expected to decrease. The growth in net premiums for the quarter in the Asia Pacific segment was generated by new business premiums from facultative and automatic treaties and renewal premiums from existing treaties, including premiums associated with accelerated critical illness coverage. The growth was also aided by favorable exchange rates, with several of the local currencies strengthening against the U.S. dollar. Stronger local currencies contributed approximately $6.4$5.7 million and $20.4$26.1 million to net premiums for the secondthird quarter and first sixnine months of 2004, respectively. Premiums earned during the secondthird quarter of 2004 associated with critical illness coverage totaled $9.8$8.5 million compared to $7.7$7.4 million in the secondthird quarter of 2003. Premiums earned associated with critical illness coverage for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2004 totaled $18.2$26.7 million, compared to $10.3$16.2 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2003. Premium levels are significantly influenced by large transactions and reporting practices of ceding companies and therefore may fluctuate from period to period. Net investment income increased to $3.0$4.4 million in the secondthird quarter of 2004 from $3.1 million in the third quarter of 2003, and to $11.1 million for the first nine months of 2004 from $8.2 million for the first nine months of 2003 due to an increase in allocated assets supporting the growth in the overall business. Investment income and realized investment gains and losses are allocated to the operating segments on the basis of capital required to support underlying business and investment performance varies with the composition of investments and the relative allocation of capital to units. Other revenues increased $2.2 million and $2.7$2.3 million during the second quarter and first sixnine months of 2004 respectively,as compared to the same period of the prior year, primarily due to fees associated with the recapture of two treaties and new fees earned on financial reinsurance transactions. 18However, other revenues for the third quarter of 2004 were $(423) thousand due to certain reclassifications of such fees. 22 Loss ratios in Asia Pacific increased from 71.3%to 81.9% for the secondthird quarter of 2004 from 71.8% for the third quarter of 2003, and to 80.0%77.9% for the second quarter ofnine months ended September 30, 2004 and from 68.6%69.7% for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2003 primarily due to 75.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2004. This ratioadverse claims experience and reserve strengthening in Australia and New Zealand. Loss ratios will fluctuate due to timing of client company reporting, variations in the mixture of business being reinsured, and the relative maturity of the business. Management believes death claims are reasonably predictable over a period of many years, but are less predictable over shorter periods and are subject to significant fluctuation. Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses as a percentage of net premiums were 14.1%16.9% in the secondthird quarter of 2004 compared to 19.7%15.5% in the secondthird quarter of 2003, and 17.8%17.5% for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2004 compared to 22.6%20.1% for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2003. These percentages fluctuate due to the timing of client company reporting and variations in the type of business being written, along with the mix of new and renewal business. Other operating expenses increased to 6.3% of premiums for the third quarter increasedof 2004 from 6.3%5.9% of premiums in 2003, while they decreased to 6.7% in 2004, while5.8% of premiums for the first sixnine months it decreasedended September 30, 2004 from 8.0% to 5.5%.7.3% of premiums for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. Generally, as net premiums grow, the burden of start-up expenses and expansion costs are somewhat alleviated. The timing of the entrance into and development of new markets may cause other operating expenses as a percentage of premiums to be somewhat volatile on a comparative quarter basis. Interest expense increased in 2004 over 2003 due to higher interest rates, an increase in debt levels in Australia to support the growth in operations, and the effect of foreign exchange rates increasing against the U.S. dollar over the prior year. CORPORATE AND OTHER OPERATIONS Corporate and Other revenues include investment income from invested assets not allocated to support segment operations and undeployed proceeds from the Company's capital raising efforts, in addition to unallocated realized capital gains or losses. General corporate expenses consist of unallocated overhead and executive costs and interest expense related to debt and the $225.0$225 million of 5.75% mandatorily redeemable trust preferred securities. Additionally, the Corporate and Other operations segment includes results from RGA Technology Partners ("RTP"), a wholly-owned subsidiary that develops and markets technology solutions for the insurance industry, the Company's Argentine privatized pension business, which is currently in run-off (see discussion of status below), and an insignificant amount of business from direct insurance operations in Argentina.
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED FOR THE SIXNINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 30, (in thousands) JUNE 30, 2004 JUNE 30, 2003 JUNE 30, 2004 JUNE 30, 2003 ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- REVENUES: Net premiums $ 1,094237 $ 1,541799 $ 1,6851,922 $ 1,9782,777 Investment income, net of related expenses 5,315 3,988 10,053 8,7657,199 3,678 17,252 12,443 Realized investment gains (losses), net 1,987 (107) 7,886 (2,005)1,904 (1,546) 9,790 (3,551) Other revenues 1,538 1,699 2,893 2,7862,687 1,761 5,580 4,547 -------- -------- -------- -------- Total revenues 9,934 7,121 22,517 11,52412,027 4,692 34,544 16,216 BENEFITS AND EXPENSES: Claims and other policy benefits 1,445 2,547 2,421 6301,496 1,746 3,917 2,376 Interest credited 81 93 92 162 139243 232 Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses 681 991 735 1,570481 106 1,216 1,676 Other operating expenses 7,040 5,573 14,111 9,9668,008 5,397 22,119 15,363 Interest expense 8,826 8,528 17,648 17,0188,892 8,802 26,540 25,820 -------- -------- -------- -------- Total benefits and expenses 18,085 17,731 35,077 29,32318,958 16,144 54,035 45,467 Loss before income taxes $ (8,151) $(10,610) $(12,560) $(17,799)(6,931) $(11,452) $(19,491) $(29,251) ======== ======== ======== ========
23 Losses before income taxes decreased 23.2%39.5% and 29.4%33.4% for the three- and six-monthnine-month periods ended JuneSeptember 30, 2004, respectively. Increases in investment income and net realized investment gains helped drive losses before income taxes lower for both periods compared to 2003. These increases were offset in part by higher claims and other policy 19 benefits for the year-to-date comparables. Foreign currency gains in the prior year helped reduce the level of claims and policy benefits on a year-to-date basis. Other operating expenses increased $2.6 million, or 48.4%, during the third quarter of 2004 compared to 2003 and $6.8 million, or 44.0%, during the first nine months of 2004 compared to 2003. The increases during both periods were primarily due to growth inhigher segment headcountcompensation expenses and related compensation expenses.external audit fees. As discussed in the Company's 2003 Annual Report, certain regulations were pending relating to permanently disabled participants of the privatized pension plans administered by Administradoras de Fondos de Jubilaciones y Pensiones ("AFJPs"). Recently, the Argentine government enacted those regulations. The new regulations require permanently disabled AFJP plan participants to elect a programmed withdrawal or an annuity with respect to deferred disability claims at a time when the AFJP fund unit values are significantly inflated. The new regulations are expected to accelerate permanent disability payments from reinsurers;reinsurers, particularly with respect to plan participants that elect programmed withdrawal. The Company cannot predict the percentage of plan participants that will elect programmed withdrawal as opposed to an annuity. Also,In addition, as discussed in the Company's 2003 Annual Report, AFJP claims payments are linked to AFJP fund unit values, which are artificially inflated because of the regulatory intervention of the Argentine government. In view of this fact, coupled with the acceleration of permanent disability payments, during the third quarter the Company has formally notified the AFJP ceding companies that it will no longer make claim payments at rates it considers to be artificially inflated, as it has been doing for some time under a reservation of rights, but rather will pay claims only on the basis of the market value of the underlying AFJP fund units. This formal notification could result in litigation or arbitrations in the future. While it is not feasible to predict or determine the ultimate outcome of any such future litigations or arbitrations or provide reasonable ranges of potential losses, it is the opinion of management, after consultation with counsel, that their outcomes, after consideration of the provisions made in the Company's consolidated financial statements, would not have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position. Additionally, as discussed in the Company's 2003 Annual Report, the Company had placed the Argentine Government on notice of its intent to file an arbitration with respect to alleged violations of the Treaty on Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investments, between the Argentine Republic and the United States of America, dated November 14, 1991 (the "Treaty"). On March 24, 2004, RGA Reinsurance filed a request for arbitration of its dispute relating to these alleged violations pursuant to the Washington Convention of 1965 on the Settlement of Investment Disputes under the auspices of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes of the World Bank. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS The discontinued accident and health division reported a loss, net of taxes, of $3.1$18.6 million for the secondthird quarter of 2004 compared to a loss, net of taxes, of $1.0$0.5 million for the secondthird quarter of 2003. The increase in net loss was due primarily to an arbitrationa negotiated settlement that exceeded estimated reserves.of all disputed claims associated with the Company's largest identified accident and health exposure. As a result of this settlement, the Company's discontinued accident and health operation recorded a $24.0 million pre-tax charge during the third quarter of 2004. As of September 30, 2004, amounts in dispute or subject to audit exceed the Company's reserves by approximately $28.6 million. The calculation of the claim reserve liability for the entire portfolio of accident and health business requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported claim reserve levels. Management must make estimates and assumptions based on historical loss experience, changes in the nature of the business, anticipated outcomes of claim disputes and claims for rescission, and projected future premium run-off, all of which may affect the level of the claim reserve liability. Due to the significant uncertainty associated with the run-off of this business, net income in future periods could be affected positively or negatively. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES The Holding Company RGA is a holding company whose primary uses of liquidity include, but are not limited to, the immediate capital needs of its operating companies associated with the Company's primary businesses, dividends paid by RGA to its shareholders, interest payments on its senior indebtedness and junior subordinated notes (See Notes 15, "Long-Term 24 Debt," and 16, "Issuance of Trust Piers Units," in the 2003 Annual Report), and repurchases of RGA common stock under a plan approved by the board of directors. In 2001, the Company's board of directors approved a repurchase program authorizing RGA to purchase up to $50.0 million of its shares of stock. RGA purchased approximately 0.2 million shares of treasury stock under the program at an aggregate cost of $6.6 million during 2002. The Company has not purchased any of its shares since 2002 and has no plans to purchase additional shares at this time. The primary sources of RGA's liquidity include proceeds from its capital raising efforts, interest income on undeployed corporate investments, interest income received on surplus notes with two operating subsidiaries, and dividends from operating subsidiaries. As the Company continues its expansion efforts, RGA will continue to be dependent on these sources of liquidity. The Company believes that it has sufficient liquidity to fund its cash needs under various scenarios that include the potential risk of the early recapture of a reinsurance treaty by the ceding company and significantly higher than expected death claims. Historically, the Company has generated positive net cash flows from operations. However, in the event of significant unanticipated cash requirements beyond normal liquidity, the Company has multiple liquidity alternatives available based on market conditions and the amount and timing of the liquidity need. These options include borrowings under committed credit facilities, secured borrowings, the ability to issue long-term debt, capital securities or common equity and, if necessary, the sale of invested assets subject to market conditions. As previously mentioned, as part of its normal review of risk management and retention levels, the Company increased its retention limit from $4.0 million to $6.0 million per life for business written after July 1, 2003. The higher retention limit will naturally lead to larger death claim payments for certain policies, but these larger payments will be partially offset by smaller premium outflows to the Company's retrocessionaires. The Company believes its sources of liquidity are sufficient to cover the potential increase in claims payments on both a short-term and long-term basis. Cash Flows The Company's net cash flows fromprovided by operating activities for the nine-month periods ended JuneSeptember 30, 2004 and 2003 were $352.1$484.0 million and $172.0$198.1 million, respectively. Cash flows from operating activities are affected by the timing of premiums received, claims paid, and working capital changes. The $285.9 million net increase in operating cash flows during the first nine months of 2004 compared to the same period in 2003 was primarily a result of cash inflows related to premiums and investment income increasing more than cash outflows related to claims, acquisition costs and other operating expenses. Cash from premiums and investment income increased $903.4 million and $65.4 million, respectively, during the first nine months of 2004, and was partially offset by higher operating cash outlays of $682.9 million. The Company believes the short-term cash requirements of its business operations will be sufficiently met by the positive cash flows generated. Additionally, the Company believes it maintains a high quality fixed maturity portfolio with goodpositive liquidity characteristics. These securities are available for sale and generally cancould be easily sold if necessary to meet the Company's obligations, if necessary. 20 short and long-term obligations. Net cash used in investing activities was $366.4$570.3 million and $312.3$441.2 million in 2004 and 2003, respectively. ChangesThe increase in cash provided byused in investing activities and, in particular, the purchases of fixed maturity securities, primarily relaterelated to the management of the Company's investment portfolios and the investment of excess capitalcash generated by operating and financing activities. Net cash provided by financing activities was $57.6$131.0 million and $206.4$284.8 million in 2004 and 2003, respectively. ChangesThe $153.9 million decrease in cash provided by financing activities primarily relaterelated to a $91.9 million decrease in cash inflows from excess deposits on universal life and other investment type policies and contracts. Additionally, the issuance of equity or debt securities,Company increased its borrowings or payments under the Company's existing credit agreements treasury stock activity, and excess deposits or withdrawals under investment type contracts.by just $4.6 million during 2004 compared to $63.4 million in the prior year. Debt and Preferred Securities Certain of the Company's debt agreements contain financial covenant restrictions related to, among others, liens, the issuance and disposition of stock of restricted subsidiaries, minimum requirements of net worth ranging from $600 million to $700 million, and minimum rating requirements. A material ongoing covenant default could require immediate payment of the amount due, including principal, under the various agreements. Additionally, the Company's debt agreements contain cross-default covenants, which would make outstanding borrowings immediately payable in the event of a material uncured covenant default under any of the agreements, including, but 25 not limited to, non-payment of indebtedness when due for amounts greater than $10 million or $25 million depending on the agreement, bankruptcy proceedings, and any event which results in the acceleration of the maturity of indebtedness. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2004, the Company had $401.4$402.3 million in outstanding borrowings under its debt agreements and was in compliance with all covenants under those agreements. The Company's U.S. credit facility expires in May 2006 and has a total capacity of $175.0 million. The Company generally may not pay dividends under the credit agreement unless, at the time of declaration and payment, a default would not exist under the agreement. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2004, the Company had $50.0$50 million outstanding under this facility and theat a blended interest rate of 2.38%. The average interest rate on all long-term debt outstanding, excluding the Company-obligated mandatorily redeemable preferred securities of subsidiary trust holding solely junior subordinated debentures of the Company ("Trust Preferred Securities"), was 6.14%6.20%. Interest is expensed on the face amount, or $225.0$225 million, of the Trust Preferred Securities at a rate of 5.75%. Statutory Dividend Limitations The ability of the Company to make principal and interest payments depends primarily on the earnings and surplus of its subsidiaries, investment earnings on undeployed capital proceeds, and the Company's ability to raise additional funds. At JuneSeptember 30, 2004, Reinsurance Company of Missouri, Incorporated ("RCM") and RGA Canada had statutory capital and surplus of $779.8$762.5 million and $235.5$245.6 million, respectively. RCM's primary asset is its investment in RGA Reinsurance Company, the Company's principal operating subsidiary based in Missouri. The transfer of funds, including dividends, from the subsidiaries to RGA is subject to applicable insurance laws and regulations. The Company expects any future increases in liquidity needs due to treaty recaptures, relatively large policy loans or unanticipated material claims levels would be met first by operating cash flows and then by selling fixed-income securities or short-term investments. Asset / Liability Management The Company actively manages its assets using an approach that is intended to balance quality, diversification, asset/liability matching, liquidity and investment return. The goals of the investment process are to optimize after-tax, risk-adjusted investment income and after-tax, risk-adjusted total return while managing the assets and liabilities on a cash flow and duration basis. The Company has established target asset portfolios for each major insurance product, which represent the investment strategies intended to profitably fund its liabilities within acceptable risk parameters. These strategies include objectives for effective duration, yield curve sensitivity and convexity, liquidity, asset sector concentration and credit quality. The Company's liquidity position (cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments) was $144.2 million and $113.5 million at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. Liquidity needs are determined from valuation analyses conducted by operational units and are driven by product portfolios. Annual evaluations of demand liabilities and short-term liquid assets are designed to adjust specific portfolios, as well as their durations and maturities, in response to anticipated liquidity needs. Future Liquidity and Capital Needs During the first quarter of 2004, RGA Reinsurance Company became a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines ("FHLB"). One of the benefits of being a member is the ability to borrow money on short notice by pledging investments. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2004, the Company had no outstanding borrowing from or assets pledged to the FHLB. Based on the historic cash flows and the current financial results of the Company, subject to any dividend limitations which may be imposed by various insurance regulations, management believes RGA's cash flows from operating activities, together with undeployed proceeds from its capital raising efforts, including interest and investment income on those proceeds, interest income received on surplus notes with two operating subsidiaries, and its ability to raise funds in the capital markets, will be sufficient to enable RGA to make dividend payments to its shareholders, to make interest payments on its senior indebtedness and junior subordinated notes, to repurchase RGA common stock under the plan approved by the board of directors, and to meet its other obligations. A general economic downturn or a downturn in the equity and other capital markets could adversely affect the market for many annuity and life insurance products. Because the Company obtains substantially all of its revenues through reinsurance arrangements that cover a portfolio of life insurance products, as well as annuities, its business would be harmed if the market for annuities or life insurance were adversely affected. 2126 The ability of RGA Reinsurance to write reinsurance partially depends on its financial condition and its ratings. RGA Reinsurance and RGA Canada have been assigned ratings of "A+" (Superior) by A.M. Best Company, which is the second highest out of fifteen possible ratings. A rating of "A+" is assigned to companies that have, in A.M. Best's opinion, a superior ability to meet their ongoing obligations to policyholders. RGA Reinsurance also maintains ratings from Standard & Poor's ("S&P") and Moody's Investor Services ("Moody's"). S&P has assigned RGA Reinsurance a financial strength rating of "AA-", which is the fourth highest rating out of twenty-one possible ratings. According to S&P's rating scale, a rating of "AA-" means that, in S&P's opinion, the insurer has very strong financial security characteristics. Moody's has assigned RGA Reinsurance a rating of "A1", which is the fifth highest rating out of twenty-one possible ratings. A Moody's "A1" rating means that Moody's believes that the insurance company offers good financial security; however, elements may be present which suggest a susceptibility to impairment sometime in the future. These ratings are based on an insurance company's ability to pay policyholder obligations and are not directed toward the protection of investors. Additionally, S&P has assigned a "AA-" financial strength rating to RGA Canada and RGA International Reinsurance Company. RGA has senior long-term debt ratings of "A-" from S&P (seventh highest rating out of twenty-two possible ratings), "Baa1" from Moody's (eighth highest rating out of twenty-two possible ratings) and "a-" from A.M. Best (seventh highest rating out of twenty-two possible ratings). Each of these credit ratings is considered investment grade. According to S&P, a rating of "A-" is somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than obligations in higher-rated categories. However, the obligor's capacity to meet its financial commitment of the obligation is still strong. According to Moody's, a rating of "Baa1" is subject to moderate credit risk. According to A.M. Best, a rating of "a-" is considered strong. A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities. It is subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating organization, and each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. INVESTMENTS The Company had total cash and invested assets of $9.5$10.2 billion and $7.8$7.9 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. All investments made by RGA and its subsidiaries conform to the qualitative and quantitative limits prescribed by the applicable jurisdiction's insurance laws and regulations. In addition, the Boards of Directors of the various operating companies periodically review the investment portfolios of their respective subsidiaries. The RGA Board of Directors also receives reports on material investment portfolios. The Company's investment strategy is to maintain a predominantly investment-grade, fixed maturity portfolio, to provide adequate liquidity for expected reinsurance obligations, and to maximize total return through prudent asset management. The Company's earned yield on invested assets, excluding funds withheld, was 5.79%6.03% during the secondthird quarter of 2004, compared with 6.67%6.59% for the secondthird quarter of 2003. See "Note 5 - INVESTMENTS" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of the 2003 Annual Report for additional information regarding the Company's investments. The Company's fixed maturity securities are invested primarily in commercial and industrial bonds, public utilities, U.S. and Canadian government securities, as well as mortgage and asset-backed securities. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2004, approximately 98%97.6% of the Company's consolidated investment portfolio of fixed maturity securities was investment-grade. Important factors in the selection of investments include diversification, quality, yield, total rate of return potential, and call protection. The relative importance of these factors is determined by market conditions and the underlying product or portfolio characteristics. Cash equivalents are invested in high-grade money market instruments. The largest asset class in which fixed maturities were invested was in corporate securities, including commercial, industrial, finance and utility bonds, which represented approximately 44.7%44.3% and 39.7%52.9% of fixed maturity securities as of JuneSeptember 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. These corporate securities had an average Standard and Poor's ("S&P") rating of "A""BBB+" at JuneSeptember 30, 2004. Within the fixed maturity security portfolio, the Company holds approximately $75.5$149.6 million in asset-backed securities at JuneSeptember 30, 2004, which include credit card and automobile receivables, home equity loans, manufactured housing bonds and collateralized bond obligations. The Company's asset-backed securities are diversified by issuer and contain both floating and fixed rate securities. In addition to the risks associated with floating rate securities, principal risks in holding asset-backed securities are structural, credit and capital market risks. Structural risks include the securities priority in the issuer's capital structure, the adequacy of and ability to realize proceeds from collateral, and the potential for prepayments. Credit risks include consumer or corporate 27 credits such as credit card holders, equipment lessees, and corporate obligors. Capital market risks include general level of interest rates and the liquidity for these securities in the marketplace. The Company monitors its fixed maturity securities to determine impairments in value. In conjunction with its external investment managers, the Companyvalue and evaluates factors such as financial condition of the issuer, payment performance, the length of time and the extent to which the market value has been below amortized cost, compliance with covenants, general market conditions and industry sector, current intent and ability to hold securities and various other subjective factors. Based on management's judgment, securities determined to have an other-than-temporary impairment in value are written down to fair value. The Company recorded other-than-temporary write-downs of $0.1$2.5 million and $11.9$16.6 million for the sixnine months ending JuneSeptember 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The circumstances that gave rise to the impairments during 20032004 were the deterioration in financial condition of one issuer and decline in collateral value supporting two asset-backed securities. During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, the Company sold fixed maturity securities with a fair value of $162.0$216.1 million at a net loss of $7.7$8.5 million. The following table presents the total gross unrealized losses for 820413 fixed maturity securities where the estimated fair value had declined and remained below amortized cost by the indicated amount (in thousands):
At JuneSeptember 30, 2004 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Gross Unrealized Losses % of Total ------ -------------------------- ---------------- Less than 20% $76,348 100%$ 26,203 96.5% 20% or more for less than six months - -%951 3.5% 20% or more for six months or greater - -% ------- ---- -------- ----- Total $76,348 100%$ 27,154 100.0%
22 While all of these securities are monitored for potential impairment, the Company's experience indicates that the first two categories do not present as great a risk of impairment, and often, fair values recover over time. These securities have generally been adversely affected primarily by overall economic conditions, primarily an increase in the interest rate environment. The following table presents the estimated fair values and gross unrealized losses for the 820413 fixed maturity securities that have estimated fair values below amortized cost as of JuneSeptember 30, 2004. These investments are presented by class and grade of security, as well as the length of time the related market value has remained below amortized cost.
AS OF JUNESEPTEMBER 30, 2004 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN LESS THAN 12 MONTHS 12 MONTHS TOTAL ---------------------------- ---------------------------- ----------------------------- Estimated------------------------- ------------------------- ------------------------- Gross Gross Gross Estimated GrossUnrealized Estimated GrossUnrealized Estimated Unrealized (in thousands) Fair Value Unrealized Loss Fair Value Unrealized Loss Fair Value Unrealized Loss ---------- --------------- ---------- --------------- ---------- ------------------------- ---------- ---------- INVESTMENT GRADE SECURITIES: COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL $ 642,752292,681 $ 24,9046,552 $ 5,41336,570 $ 5871,932 $ 648,165329,251 $ 25,4918,484 PUBLIC UTILITIES 304,153 12,693 - - 304,153 12,693104,532 1,850 2,845 141 107,377 1,991 ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES 34,298 533 2,280 204 36,578 73739,437 2,449 39,437 2,449 CANADIAN AND CANADIAN PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS 87,722 5,366 - - 87,722 5,36634,037 1,233 34,037 1,233 MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES 71,030 1,162 4,327 197 75,357 1,35954,402 965 1,396 108 55,798 1,073 FINANCE 247,071 11,161 15,322 735 262,393 11,896153,129 3,917 26,535 699 179,664 4,616 U.S. GOVERNMENT AND AGENCIES 610,818 15,909 - - 610,818 15,909397,060 5,117 12,201 465 409,261 5,582 FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS 119,976 2,117 - - 119,976 2,117105,747 1,062 105,747 1,062 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- INVESTMENT GRADE SECURITIES 2,117,820 73,845 27,342 1,723 2,145,162 75,5681,181,025 23,145 79,547 3,345 1,260,572 26,490 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- NON-INVESTMENT GRADE SECURITIES: COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL 10,826 444 - - 10,826 444 PUBLIC UTILITIES 8,878 336 - - 8,878 33614,873 408 14,873 408 ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES 4,855 256 4,855 256 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- NON-INVESTMENT GRADE SECURITIES 19,704 78019,728 664 - - 19,704 78019,728 664 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- TOTAL $2,137,524$1,200,753 $ 74,62523,809 $ 27,34279,547 $ 1,723 $2,164,8663,345 $1,280,300 $ 76,34827,154 ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
The Company believes that the analysis of each security whose price has been below market for greater than twelve months or longer indicated that the financial strength, liquidity, leverage, future outlook and/or recent management actions support the view that the security was not other-than-temporarily impaired as of JuneSeptember 30, 2004. The unrealized losses did not exceed 6%8.0% on an individual security basis and are primarily a result of rising interest 28 rates, changes in credit spreads and the long-dated maturities of the securities. Additionally, 99% of the gross unrealized losses are associated witheach security whose price has been below market for twelve months or longer is investment grade securities.grade. The Company's mortgage loan portfolio consists principally of investments in U.S.-based commercial offices and retail locations. The mortgage loan portfolio is diversified by geographic region and property type. All mortgage loans are performing and no valuation allowance has been established as of JuneSeptember 30, 2004. Policy loans present no credit risk because the amount of the loan cannot exceed the obligation due the ceding company upon the death of the insured or surrender of the underlying policy. The provisions of the treaties in force and the underlying policies determine the policy loan interest rates. Because policy loans represent premature distributions of policy liabilities, they have the effect of reducing future disintermediation risk. In addition, the Company earns a spread between the interest rate earned on policy loans and the interest rate credited to corresponding liabilities. Funds withheld at interest comprised approximately 31.8%25.0% and 30.3% of the Company's cash and invested assets as of JuneSeptember 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. For agreements written on a modified coinsurance basis and certain agreements written on a coinsurance basis, assets equal to the net statutory reserves are withheld and legally owned and managed by the ceding company, and are reflected as funds withheld at interest on RGA's balance sheet. In the event of a ceding company's insolvency, RGA would need to assert a claim on the assets supporting its reserve liabilities. However, the risk of loss to RGA is mitigated by its ability to offset amounts it owes the ceding company for claims or allowances with amounts owed to RGA from the ceding company. Interest accrues to these assets at rates defined by the treaty terms. The Company is subject to the investment performance on the withheld assets, although it does not directly control them. These assets are primarily fixed maturity investment securities and pose risks similar to the fixed maturity securities the Company owns. To mitigate this risk, the Company helps set 23 the investment guidelines followed by the ceding company and monitors compliance. Ceding companies with funds withheld at interest had a minimum A.M. Best rating of "A-". CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS The following table displays the Company's contractual obligations that have materially changed since December 31, 2003 (in millions):
Payment Due by Period ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Less than Contractual Obligations: Total 1 Year 1 - 3 Years 4 - 5 Years After 5 Years - ------------------------ --------------- --------- ----------- ----------- ------------- LongShort - term debt $ 401.427.2 $ 27.3 $ 174.2 $ - $ 199.9 Life claims payable(1) $ 620.9 $ 620.927.2 $ - $ - $ - -------- -------- -------- -------- --------Long - term debt $ 375.1 $ - $ 175.2 $ - $ 199.9 Fixed-rate interest on senior notes $ 115.8 $ 20.8 $ 34.3 $ 13.5 $ 47.2 Fixed-rate interest on Trust Preferred Securities(2) $ 601.6 $ 12.9 $ 25.9 $ 12.9 $ 549.9 Life claims payable(1) $ 618.4 $ 618.4 $ - $ - $ -
(1) Included in the Otherother policy claims and benefits line item in the condensed consolidated balance sheet. A significant portion(2) Assumes that all securities will be held until the stated maturity date of theMarch 18, 2051. The Company's insurance liabilities, including most future policy benefits and interest sensitive contract liabilities, represent future obligations, where the timing of payment is unknown because the payment depends on an insurable event, such as the death of an insured, or policyholder behavior, such as the surrender or lapse of a policy. These future obligations are established based primarily on actuarial principles and are reflected on the Company's consolidated balance sheet, but have been excluded from the table above due to the uncertain timing of payment. 29 MORTALITY RISK MANAGEMENT In the normal course of business, the Company seeks to limit its exposure to loss on any single insured and to recover a portion of benefits paid by ceding reinsurance to other insurance enterprises or reinsurers under excess coverage and coinsurance contracts. In the U.S., the Company retains a maximum of $6.0 million of coverage per individual life. For other countries, particularly those with higher risk factors or smaller books of business, the Company systematically reduces its retention. The Company has a number of retrocession arrangements whereby certain business in force is retroceded on an automatic or facultative basis. Generally, RGA's insurance subsidiaries retrocede amounts in excess of their retention to RGA Reinsurance, RGA Barbados, or RGA Americas. Retrocessions are arranged through the Company's retrocession pools for amounts in excess of its retention. The Company also retrocedes most of its financial reinsurance business to other insurance companies to alleviate the strain on statutory surplus created by this table becausebusiness. For a majority of the retrocessionaires that were not rated, letters of credit or trust assets have been given as additional security in favor of RGA Reinsurance. In addition, the Company performs annual financial and in force reviews of its retrocessionaires to evaluate financial stability and performance. The Company has never experienced a material default in connection with retrocession arrangements, nor has it experienced any material difficulty in collecting claims recoverable from retrocessionaires; however, no assurance can be given as to the future performance of such amountsretrocessionaires or as to the recoverability of any such claims. The Company maintains two catastrophe insurance programs that renew on August 13th of each year. The current programs began August 13, 2004. The primary program covers all of RGA's business worldwide and provides protection for losses incurred during any event involving 10 or more insured deaths. Under this program, RGA retains the first $50 million in claims, the catastrophe program covers the next $30 million in claims, and RGA retains all claims in excess of $80 million. This program covers terrorism related losses including those due to nuclear, chemical or biological events. Under the second program, which covers events involving 5 or more insured deaths, RGA retains the first $25 million in claims, the catastrophe program covers the next $25 million in claims, and RGA retains all claims in excess of $50 million. It covers only losses under US guaranteed issue (COLI, BOLI, etc) reinsurances and includes losses due to acts of terrorism but excludes terrorism losses due to nuclear, chemical and/or their timingbiological events. Both programs are inherently subjective.insured by several insurance companies and Lloyds Syndicates with no single entity providing more than $10 million of coverage. COUNTERPARTY RISK In the normal course of business, the Company seeks to limit its exposure to reinsurance contracts by ceding a portion of the reinsurance to other insurance companies or reinsurers. Should a counterparty not be able to fulfill its obligation to the Company under a reinsurance agreement, the impact could be material to the Company's financial condition and results of operations. MARKET RISK Market risk is the risk of loss that may occur when fluctuations in interest and currency exchange rates and equity and commodity prices change the value of a financial instrument. Both derivative and nonderivative financial instruments have market risk so the Company's risk management extends beyond derivatives to encompass all financial instruments held that are sensitive to market risk. RGA is primarily exposed to interest rate risk and foreign currency risk. Interest Rate Riskrate risk arises from many of the Company's primary activities, as the Company invests substantial funds in interest-sensitive assets and also has certain interest-sensitive contract liabilities. The Company manages interest rate risk and credit risk to maximize the return on the Company's capital effectively and to preserve the value created by its business operations. As such, certain management monitoring processes are designed to minimize the impact of sudden and sustained changes in interest rates on fair value, cash flows, and net interest income. The Company is subject to foreign currency translation, transaction, and net income exposure. The Company generally does not hedge the foreign currency translation exposure related to its investment in foreign subsidiaries as it views these investments to be long-term. Translation differences resulting from translating foreign subsidiary balances to U.S. dollars are reflected in equity. The Company generally does not hedge the foreign currency exposure of its subsidiaries transacting business in currencies other than their functional currency (transaction exposure). 30 There has been no significant change in the Company's quantitative or qualitative aspects of market risk during the quarter ended JuneSeptember 30, 2004 from that disclosed in the 2003 Annual Report. NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS In March 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") of the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") reached further consensus on Issue No. 03-1, "The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments" ("EITF 03-1"). EITF 03-1 provides accounting guidance regarding the determination of when an impairment of debt and marketable equity securities and investments accounted for under the cost method should be considered other-than-temporary and recognized in income. An EITF 03-1 consensus reached in DecemberNovember 2003 also requires certain quantitative and qualitative disclosures for debt and marketable equity securities classified as available-for-sale or held-to-maturity under SFAS No. 115, Accounting"Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, that are impaired at the 24 balance sheet date but for which an other-than-temporary impairment has not been recognized." The Company has complied with the disclosure requirements of EITF 03-1 which were effective December 31, 2003. The accounting guidance of EITF 03-1 willrelating to the recognition of investment impairment which was to be effective in the third quarter of 2004 has been delayed pending the development of additional guidance. The Company is actively monitoring the deliberations relating to this issue at the FASB and currently is not expectedunable to havedetermine the impact of EITF 03-1 on its unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements. In conformity with existing generally accepted accounting principles, the Company's gross unrealized losses totaling $27.2 million at September 30, 2004 are reflected as a material impactcomponent of other comprehensive income on the Company's consolidated financial statements.balance sheet. Depending on the ultimate guidance issued by the FASB, including guidance regarding management's assertion about intent and ability to hold available-for-sale investment securities, the Company could be required to report these unrealized losses in a different manner, including possibly reflecting these unrealized losses in the consolidated income statement as other-than-temporary impairments, even if the unrealized losses are attributable solely to interest rate movements. In March 2004, the EITF reached consensuses on Issue No. 03-6, "Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No. 128" ("EITF 03-6"). EITF 03-6 provides guidance in determining whether a security should be considered a participating security for purposes of computing earnings per share and how earnings should be allocated to the participating security. EITF 03-6, which was effective for the Company in the second quarter of 2004, did not have an impact on the Company's earnings per share calculations. In March 2004, the EITF reached consensus on Issue No. 03-16, "Accounting for Investments in Limited Liability Companies" ("EITF 03-16"). EITF 03-16 provides guidance regarding whether a limited liability company should be viewed as similar to a corporation or similar to a partnership for purposes of determining whether a noncontrolling investment should be accounted for using the cost method or the equity method of accounting. EITF 03-16, which will be effective in the third quarter of 2004, isdid not expected to have a material impact on the Company's unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements. In December 2003, the FASB revised SFAS No. 132, "Employers' Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits -- an Amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88 and 106" ("SFAS 132(r)"). SFAS 132(r) retains most of the disclosure requirements of SFAS 132 and requires additional disclosure about assets, obligations, cash flows and net periodic benefit cost of defined benefit pension plans and other defined postretirement plans. SFAS 132(r) was primarily effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2003; however, certain disclosures about foreign plans and estimated future benefit payments are effective for fiscal years ending after June 15, 2004. The Company's adoption of SFAS 132(r) on December 31, 2003 did not have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements since it only revised disclosure requirements. Effective July, 1, 2004, the Company adopted FASB Staff Position ("FSP") No. 106-2, "Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003" ("FSP 106-2"), which provides accounting guidance to a sponsor of a post-retirement health care plan that provides prescription drug benefits. The impact of the Company's application of FSP 106-2 was immaterial. In July 2003, the Accounting Standards Executive Committee issued Statement of Position ("SOP") 03-1, "Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises for Certain Nontraditional Long-Duration Contracts and for Separate Accounts." SOP 03-1 provides guidance on separate account presentation and valuation, the accounting for sales inducements and the classification and valuation of long-duration contract liabilities. The Company adopted the provisions of SOP 03-1 on January 1, 2004, recording a charge of $361 thousand, net of income taxes. 31 In April 2003, the FASB cleared SFAS No. 133 Implementation Issue No. B36, "Embedded Derivatives: Modified Coinsurance Arrangements and Debt Instruments That Incorporate Credit Risk Exposures That Are Unrelated or Only Partially Related to the Creditworthiness of the Obligor under Those Instruments" ("Issue B36"). Issue B36 concluded that (i) a company's funds withheld payable and/or receivable under certain reinsurance arrangements and (ii) a debt instrument that incorporates credit risk exposures that are unrelated or only partially related to the creditworthiness of the obligor include an embedded derivative feature that is not clearly and closely related to the host contract. Therefore, the embedded derivative feature must be measured at fair value on the balance sheet and changes in fair value reported in income. The Company adopted the provisions of Issue B36 during the fourth quarter of 2003 and recorded a net gain of $0.5 million as a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle. In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB")FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities" ("FIN 46"), an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, "Consolidated Financial Statements," which requires the consolidation by a business enterprise of variable interest entities if the business enterprise is the primary beneficiary. FIN 46 was effective January 31, 2003, for the Company with respect to interests in variable interest entities obtained after that date. With respect to interests in variable interest entities existing prior to February 1, 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003), which extended the effective date of FIN 46 to the period ending March 31, 2004. The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 46 as of March 31, 2004 and is not required to consolidate any material interests in variable interest entities. FORWARD-LOOKING AND CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including, among others, statements relating to projections of the earnings, revenues, income or loss, future financial performance and growth potential of Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated and its subsidiaries (referred(which we refer to in the following paragraphs as "we," "us" or "our"). The words "intend," "expect," "project," "estimate," "predict," "anticipate," "should," "believe," and other similar expressions also are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which cannot be predicted or quantified. Future events and actual results, performance and achievements could differ materially from those set forth in, contemplated by or underlying the forward-looking statements. Numerous important factors could cause actual results and events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements including, without limitation, (1) adverse changes in mortality, morbidity or claims experience, (2) changes in our financial strength and credit ratings or those of MetLife, Inc. ("MetLife"), the beneficial owner of a majority of our common shares, or its subsidiaries, and the effect of such changes on our future results of operations and financial condition, (3) general economic conditions affecting the demand for insurance and reinsurance in our current and planned markets, (4) market or economic conditions that adversely affect our ability to make timely sales of investment securities, (5) risks inherent in our risk management and investment strategy, including changes in investment portfolio yields and valuations due to interest rate or credit quality changes, (6) fluctuations in U.S. or foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates, or securities and real estate markets, (7) adverse litigation or arbitration results, (8) the adequacy of reserves relating to settlements, awards and terminated and discontinued lines of business, (9) the stability of governments and economies and actions taken by governments in the markets in which we operate, (9)(10) competitive factors and competitors' responses to our initiatives, (10)(11) the success of our clients, (11)(12) successful execution of our entry into new markets, (12)(13) successful development and introduction of new products, (13)(14) our ability to successfully integrate and operate 25 reinsurance business that we acquire, including without limitation, the traditional life reinsurance business of Allianz Life, (14)(15) regulatory action that may be taken by state Departments of Insurance with respect to us, MetLife, or its subsidiaries, (15)(16) our dependence on third parties, including those insurance companies and reinsurers to which we cede some reinsurance, third-party investment managers and others, (17) changes in laws, regulations, and accounting standards applicable to us, our subsidiaries, or our business, and (16)(18) other risks and uncertainties described in this document and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC").Commission. Forward-looking statements should be evaluated together with the many risks and uncertainties that affect our business, including those mentioned in this document and the cautionary statements described in the periodic reports we file with the SEC. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on theSecurities and Exchange Commission. These forward-looking statements which speak only as of the date on which they are made. We do not undertake any obligations to update these forward-looking statements, even though our situation may change in the future. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements. For a discussion of these risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements, you are advised to consult the sections named "Risk Factors" and "Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" contained in our Registration Statement on Form S-3, as amended, filed with the SEC on July 9, 2004.32 ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK. See "Item 2 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - - Market Risk" which is incorporated by reference herein. ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES As of the end of the period covered by this report, management, including theThe Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures with respect to the information generated for useas defined in this Quarterly Report. Based upon, andExchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) as of the dateend of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that thethese disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms.effective. There was no change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) during the quarter ended JuneSeptember 30, 2004, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. 26 PART II - OTHER INFORMATION ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS The Company is currently a party to various litigation and arbitrations that involve its discontinued accident and health business, including medical reinsurance arrangements, personal accident business and(including London market excess of loss business), aviation bodily injury carve-out business and worker's compensation carve-out business. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2004, the ceding companies involved in these disputes have raised claims, or established reserves that may result in claims, that are $91.6in the amount of $5.6 million, which is $4.9 million in excess of the amounts held in reserve by the Company. The Company generally has little information regarding any reserves established by the ceding companies, and it is possible that any such reserves could be increased in the future. The Company believes it has substantial defenses upon which to contest these claims, including but not limited to misrepresentation and breach of contract by direct and indirect ceding companies. In addition, the Company is in the process of auditing ceding companies that have indicated that they anticipate asserting claims in the future against the Company that are $16.6in the amount of $24.1 million, which is $23.7 million in excess of the amounts held in reserve by the Company.Company as of September 30, 2004. Depending upon the audit findings in these cases, they could result in litigation or arbitrations in the future. See Note 21, "Discontinued Operations," in the Company's 2003 Annual Report for more information. During the third quarter of 2004, the Company's discontinued accident and health operations recorded a $24.0 million pre-tax charge related to the negotiated settlement of all disputed claims associated with its largest identified accident and health exposure. Additionally, from time to time, the Company is subject to litigation and arbitration related to its life reinsurance business and to employment-related matters in the normal course of its business. While it is not feasible to predict or determine the ultimate outcome of the pending litigation or arbitrations or provide reasonable ranges of potential losses, it is the opinion of management, after consultation with counsel, that their outcomes, after consideration of the provisions made in the Company's consolidated financial statements, would not have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position. In addition, as discussed in the Company's Annual Report, AFJP claims payments are linked to AFJP fund unit values, which are artificially inflated because of the regulatory intervention of the Argentine government. In view of this fact, coupled with the acceleration of permanent disability payments, during the third quarter the Company has formally notified the AFJP ceding companies that it will no longer make artificially inflated claim payments, as it has been doing for some time under a reservation of rights, but rather will pay claims only on the basis of the market value of the AFJP fund units. This formal notification could result in litigation or arbitrations in the future. While it is not feasible to predict or determine the ultimate outcome of any such future litigations or arbitrations or provide reasonable ranges of potential losses, it is the opinion of management, after consultation with counsel, that their outcomes, after consideration of the provisions made in the Company's consolidated financial statements, would not have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position. 33 ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS Under a Board of Directors approved plan, the Company may purchase at its discretion up to $50 million of its common stock on the open market. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2004, the Company had purchased 225,500 shares of treasury stock under this program at an aggregate price of $6.6 million. All purchases were made during 2002. The Company generally uses treasury shares to support the future exercise of options granted under its stock option plans. ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS The Company's Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on May 26, 2004. At the Annual Meeting, the following proposals were voted upon by the shareholders as indicated below: (1) Election of the following Directors:
Directors Voted For Withheld --------- --------- -------- William J. Bartlett 59,342,143 1,070,529 Alan C. Henderson 59,242,725 1,169,947 A. Greig Woodring 48,122,735 12,289,937
Voted For Voted Against Abstain --------- ------------- ------- (2) Proposal to amend to the Company's Second Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of outstanding shares 58,306,107 2,048,580 57,985 (3) Proposal to amend the Articles of Incorporation to delete Section D and renumber Section E 60,323,068 13,612 75,992 (4) Proposal to amend Section A of Article Six of the Articles of Incorporation regarding the number of directors 59,950,425 386,797 75,450
27 (5) Proposal to amend Sections C of Article Six and Section B of Article Nine of the Articles of Incorporation regarding advance notice of nominations and proposals 42,367,051 15,690,082 87,981 (6) Proposal to amend the Articles of Incorporation adding new Article Thirteen 59,778,535 547,498 86,639 (7) Proposal to authorize the sale of certain types of securities from time to time to MetLife, Inc. or its affiliates 42,212,315 15,856,085 76,714 (8) Proposal to amend the Company's Flexible Stock Plan 59,560,054 520,218 332,400
ITEM 6 EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K (a) See index to exhibits. (b) The following reports on Form 8-K were filed or furnished with the Securities and Exchange Commission during the quarter ended June 30, 2004: 1. The Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 29, 2004, furnishing, under Items 9 and 12, its press release discussing results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2004. The press release was attached thereto as Exhibit 99.1. 2. The Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 26, 2004, disclosing, under Items 5 and 7, certain voting results from its annual meeting. The Company's restated articles of incorporation were attached thereto as Exhibit 3.1. 2834 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated By: /s/ A. Greig Woodring AugustNovember 5, 2004 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A. Greig Woodring President & Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) By: /s/ Jack B. Lay AugustNovember 5, 2004 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jack B. Lay Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) 2935 INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit Number Description - ------ ----------- 2.1 Master Agreement by and between Allianz Life Insurance of North America and RGA Reinsurance Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 9, 2003 (file no. 1-11848). 2.2 Life Coinsurance Retrocession Agreement by and between Allianz Life Insurance of North America and RGA Reinsurance Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 9, 2003 (file no. 1-11848). 3.1 Restated Articles of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 30, 2004. 3.2 Bylaws of RGA, as amended, effective May 26,incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed August 6, 2004. 10.1 Third Amendment effective as of May 26, 2004 to the RGA Flexible Stock Plan, as amended and restated July 1, 1998 31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
3036