UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)


þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008


o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 001-14793

FIRST BANCORP.

(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)


Puerto Rico		~~66-0561882~~
(State or other jurisdiction of		~~(I.R.S. employer~~
incorporation or organization)		66-0561882 (I.R.S. employer identification number)

1519 Ponce de León Avenue, Stop 23		00908
Santurce, Puerto Rico		(Zip Code)
(Address of principal executive offices)

(787) 729-8200
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesþ Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):


Large accelerated filerþ	Accelerated filero	Non-accelerated filero	~~Smaller reporting company~~o
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller Reporting Companyo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yeso Noþ

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Common stock: 92,510,506 outstanding as of ~~July~~October 31, 2008.

Forward Looking Statements

This Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. When used in this Form 10-Q or future filings by First BanCorp (the “Corporation”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), in the Corporation’s press releases or in other public or shareholder communications, or in oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer, the word or phrases “would be,” “will allow,” “intends to,” “will likely result,” “are expected to,” “should,” “anticipate” and similar expressions are meant to identify “forward-looking statements.”

First BanCorp wishes to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such “forward-looking statements,” which speak only as of the date made, and represent First BanCorp’s expectations of future conditions or results and are not guarantees of future performance. First BanCorp advises readers that various factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any “forward-looking statement.” Such factors include, but are not limited to, the following:

	•		risks arising from credit and other risks of the Corporation’s lending and investment activities, including the Corporation’s condo conversion loans infrom its Miami ~~Agency~~Corporate Banking operations and the construction loan portfolio in Puerto ~~Rico;~~Rico, which may affect, among other things, the level of non-performing assets, charge-offs and loan loss provision;

	•		an adverse change in the Corporation’s ability to attract new clients and retain existing ones;

	•		changes in general economic conditions in the United States and Puerto Rico, including the ~~current~~ interest rate ~~scenario~~environment, market liquidity, market rates and prices, and disruptions in the ~~performance of the financial~~U.S. capital markets which may reduce interest margins, impact funding sources and affect demand for the Corporation’s products and services and the value of the Corporation’s assets, including the value of the interest rate swaps that economically hedge the interest rate risk mainly relating to brokered certificates of deposit and medium-term notes as well as other derivative instruments used for protection from interest rate fluctuations;

	•		~~risks arising from worsening economic conditions~~uncertainty about the effectiveness and impact of the U.S. government’s rescue plan, including the bailout of U.S. government-sponsored housing agencies, on the financial markets in general and on the Corporation’s business, financial condition and results of operations;

	•		uncertainty about the Corporation’s participation in the Troubled Asset Relief Program, if it should decide to apply to issue preferred stock through this program;

	•		changes in the fiscal and monetary policies and regulations of the federal government and including those determined by the Federal Reserve System (FED), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), government-sponsored housing agencies and local regulators in Puerto Rico and the ~~United States;~~U.S. and British Virgin Islands;

	•		risks of not being able to recover all assets pledged to Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc.;

	•		changes in the Corporation’s expenses associated with acquisitions and dispositions;

	•		developments in technology;

	•		the impact of Doral Financial Corporation’s and R&G Financial Corporation’s financial condition on the repayment of their outstanding secured loans to the Corporation;

	•		the Corporation’s ability to issue brokered certificates of deposit and fund operations;

	•		risks associated with ~~any~~ downgrades in the credit ratings of the Corporation’s securities; and

	•		general competitive factors and industry ~~consolidation; and~~

	•		risks associated with regulatory and legislative changes for financial services companies in Puerto Rico, the United States, and the U.S. and British Virgin Islands and changes in the regulation of housing government-sponsored enterprises.consolidation.

The Corporation does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation, to update any of the ~~“forward-looking~~“forward- looking statements” to reflect occurrences or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements except as required by the federal securities laws.

Investors should carefully consider these factors and the risk factors outlined under Item 1A, Risk Factors, inof Part II of this Quarterly Report on Form ~~10-Q.~~10-Q, and Item 1A, Risk Factors, in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.

FIRST BANCORP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

(Unaudited)


(In thousands, except for share information)	June 30, 2008			December 31, 2007			September 30, 2008			December 31, 2007
Assets
ASSETS

Cash and due from banks	$	122,979		$	195,809		$	151,040		$	195,809


Money market instruments		121,415			148,579			34,998			148,579
Federal funds sold		10,810			7,957			142,436			7,957
Time deposits with other financial institutions		16,646			26,600			116,684			26,600

Total money market investments		148,871			183,136			294,118			183,136

Investment securities available for sale, at fair value:
Securities pledged that can be repledged		3,006,577			789,271			2,691,829			789,271
Other investment securities		1,052,652			497,015			1,325,120			497,015

Total investment securities available for sale		4,059,229			1,286,286			4,016,949			1,286,286

Investment securities held to maturity, at amortized cost:
Securities pledged that can be repledged		1,336,541			2,522,509			985,230			2,522,509
Other investment securities		459,571			754,574			748,826			754,574

Total investment securities held to maturity, fair value of $1,779,015 (2007 - $3,261,934)		1,796,112			3,277,083
Total investment securities held to maturity, fair value of $1,711,586 (2007 - $3,261,934)								1,734,056			3,277,083

Other equity securities		82,126			64,908			60,796			64,908

Loans, net of allowance for loan and lease losses of $222,272 (2007 - $190,168)		11,998,579			11,588,654

Loans, net of allowance for loan and lease losses of $261,170 (2007 - $190,168)								12,419,422			11,588,654
Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or market		29,194			20,924			32,510			20,924

Total loans, net		12,027,773			11,609,578			12,451,932			11,609,578

Premises and equipment, net		170,733			162,635			172,285			162,635
Other real estate owned		38,620			16,116			40,422			16,116
Accrued interest receivable on loans and investments		97,971			107,979			91,158			107,979
Due from customers on acceptances		652			747			961			747
Other assets		283,720			282,654			290,723			282,654

Total assets	$	18,828,786		$	17,186,931		$	19,304,440		$	17,186,931

Liabilities & Stockholders’ Equity

Liabilities:
LIABILITIES

Deposits:
Non-interest-bearing deposits	$	690,451		$	621,884		$	661,197		$	621,884
Interest-bearing deposits (including $1,689,208 and $4,186,563 measured at fair value as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively)		10,837,333			10,412,637
Interest-bearing deposits (including $1,515,525 and $4,186,563 measured at fair value as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively)								12,158,635			10,412,637

Total deposits								12,819,832			11,034,521
Loans payable								300,000			—
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase		3,999,590			3,094,646			3,326,936			3,094,646
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB)		1,460,000			1,103,000			986,000			1,103,000
Notes payable (including $13,407 and $14,306 measured at fair value as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively)		27,944			30,543
Notes payable (including $12,445 and $14,306 measured at fair value as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively)								26,725			30,543
Other borrowings		231,865			231,817			231,890			231,817
Bank acceptances outstanding		652			747			961			747
Accounts payable and other liabilities		179,258			270,011			170,824			270,011

Total liabilities		17,427,093			15,765,285			17,863,168			15,765,285


Commitments and contingencies (Note 19)
Commitments and contingencies (Note 20)

Stockholders’ equity:
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred stock, authorized 50,000,000 shares: issued and outstanding 22,004,000 shares at $25 liquidation value per share		550,100			550,100			550,100			550,100

Common stock, $1 par value, authorized 250,000,000 shares; issued 102,408,306 as of June 30, 2008 (2007 - 102,402,306)		102,408			102,402
Common stock, $1 par value, authorized 250,000,000 shares; issued 102,408,306 as of September 30, 2008 (2007 - 102,402,306)								102,408			102,402
Less: Treasury stock (at par value)		(9,898	)		(9,898	)		(9,898	)		(9,898	)

Common stock outstanding		92,510			92,504
Common stock outstanding, 92,510,506 as of September 30, 2008 (2007 - 92,504,506)								92,510			92,504

Additional paid-in capital		108,326			108,279			108,326			108,279
Legal surplus		286,049			286,049			286,049			286,049
Retained earnings		443,473			409,978			451,474			409,978
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax benefit of $977 (2007 - $227)		(78,765	)		(25,264	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax benefit of $1,086 (2007 - $227)								(47,187	)		(25,264	)

Total stockholders’ equity		1,401,693			1,421,646			1,441,272			1,421,646

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	18,828,786		$	17,186,931		$	19,304,440		$	17,186,931

FIRST BANCORP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Unaudited)


	Quarter Ended						Six-Month Period Ended					Quarter Ended						Nine-Month Period Ended
	June 30,			June 30,			June 30,		June 30,			September 30,			September 30,			September 30,		September 30,
(In thousands, except per share data)	2008			2007			2008		2007			2008			2007			2008		2007
Interest income:
Loans	$	204,794		$	228,911		$	418,605	$	454,550		$	208,241		$	223,738		$	626,846	$	678,288
Investment securities		70,001			71,672			132,018		139,344			79,077			62,794			211,095		202,138
Money market investments		1,813			5,288			5,072		10,562			974			9,399			6,046		19,961

Total interest income		276,608			305,871			555,695		604,456			288,292			295,931			843,987		900,387


Interest expense:
Deposits		99,767			133,882			205,964		257,972			95,089			143,188			301,053		401,160
Loans payable													240			—			240		—
Federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements		28,969			39,390			62,908		81,160			35,790			34,300			98,698		115,460
Advances from FHLB		9,572			9,001			20,720		17,198			10,018			9,172			30,738		26,370
Notes payable and other borrowings		3,694			6,383			7,039		13,476			2,534			4,242			9,573		17,718

Total interest expense		142,002			188,656			296,631		369,806			143,671			190,902			440,302		560,708

Net interest income		134,606			117,215			259,064		234,650			144,621			105,029			403,685		339,679


Provision for loan and lease losses		41,323			24,628			87,116		49,542			55,319			34,260			142,435		83,802


Net interest income after provision for loan and lease losses		93,283			92,587			171,948		185,108			89,302			70,769			261,250		255,877


Non-interest income:
Other service charges on loans		1,418			2,418			2,731		4,209			1,612			1,290			4,343		5,499
Service charges on deposit accounts		3,191			3,185			6,555		6,376			3,170			3,160			9,725		9,536
Mortgage banking activities		804			351			1,123		1,113			1,231			1,125			2,354		2,238
Net (loss) gain on investments and impairments		(679	)		(1,436	)		15,514		(3,595	)		(564	)		(3,119	)		14,950		(6,714	)
Net gain on partial extinguishment and recharacterization of a secured commercial loan to a local financial institution		—			—			—		2,497			—			—			—		2,497
Rental income		579			669			1,122		1,333			583			620			1,705		1,953
Gain on sale of credit card portfolio		—			—			—		2,819			—			—			—		2,819
Insurance reimbursements and other agreements related to a contingency settlement													—			15,075			—		15,075
Other non-interest income		6,689			5,716			14,337		11,973			7,839			5,769			22,176		17,742

Total non-interest income		12,002			10,903			41,382		26,725			13,871			23,920			55,253		50,645


Non-interest expenses:
Employees’ compensation and benefits		34,994			33,352			71,320		69,724			35,629			33,995			106,949		103,719
Occupancy and equipment		15,541			14,496			30,520		28,878			15,647			14,970			46,167		43,848
Business promotion		4,802			4,864			9,067		9,794			4,083			2,973			13,150		12,767
Professional fees		4,919			5,608			9,978		12,005			2,724			4,473			12,702		16,478
Taxes, other than income taxes		3,988			3,653			8,014		7,234			4,242			4,015			12,256		11,249
Insurance and supervisory fees		3,945			1,799			7,929		3,491			4,213			5,282			12,142		8,773
Foreclosure-related expenses		3,172			266			6,428		541			5,626			588			12,054		1,129
Other non-interest expenses		10,402			9,416			20,694		21,151			10,212			8,656			30,906		29,807

Total non-interest expenses		81,763			73,454			163,950		152,818			82,376			74,952			246,326		227,770


Income before income taxes		23,522			30,036			49,380		59,015			20,797			19,737			70,177		78,752
Income tax benefit (provision)		9,472			(6,241	)		17,203		(12,388	)		3,749			(5,595	)		20,952		(17,983	)


Net income	$	32,994		$	23,795		$	66,583	$	46,627		$	24,546		$	14,142		$	91,129	$	60,769

Net income attributable to common stockholders	$	22,925		$	13,726		$	46,445	$	26,489		$	14,477		$	4,073		$	60,922	$	30,562


Net income per common share:
Basic	$	0.25		$	0.16		$	0.50	$	0.32		$	0.16		$	0.05		$	0.66	$	0.36

Diluted	$	0.25		$	0.16		$	0.50	$	0.32		$	0.16		$	0.05		$	0.66	$	0.36

Dividends declared per common share	$	0.07		$	0.07		$	0.14	$	0.14		$	0.07		$	0.07		$	0.21	$	0.21

FIRST BANCORP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)


	Six-Month Period Ended						Nine-Month Period Ended
	June 30,			June 30,			September 30,			September 30,
(In thousands)	2008			2007			2008			2007
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	66,583		$	46,627		$	91,129		$	60,769

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation		9,165			8,394			14,188			13,239
Amortization of core deposit intangible		1,695			1,660			2,695			2,477
Provision for loan and lease losses		87,116			49,542			142,435			83,802
Deferred income tax benefit		(15,068	)		(2,013	)
Deferred income tax (benefit) provision								(23,986	)		12,511
Stock-based compensation recognized		—			2,848			—			2,848
(Gain) loss on sale of investments, net		(16,003	)		732			(16,135	)		1,482
Other-than-temporary impairments on available-for-sale securities		489			2,863			1,185			5,232
Derivative instruments and hedging activities (gain) loss		(27,599	)		363			(31,889	)		6,481
Net gain on sale of loans and impairments		(617	)		(606	)		(1,635	)		(1,485	)
Net gain on partial extinguishment and recharacterization of a secured commercial loan to a local financial institution		—			(2,497	)		—			(2,497	)
Net amortization of premiums and discounts and deferred loan fees and costs		(539	)		(1,043	)		(956	)		(936	)
Amortization of broker placement fees		7,079			4,765			10,935			7,426
Accretion of basis adjustments on fair value hedges		—			(2,061	)		—			(2,061	)
Net accretion of premium and discounts on investment securities		(7,900	)		(18,246	)		(8,196	)		(29,550	)
Gain on sale of credit card portfolio		—			(2,819	)		—			(2,819	)
(Decrease) increase in accrued income tax payable		(4,715	)		9,963
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable		10,205			(2,451	)
Decrease in accrued income tax payable								(13,429	)		(4,791	)
Decrease in accrued interest receivable								17,018			6,088
Decrease in accrued interest payable		(31,588	)		(26,809	)		(37,906	)		(26,374	)
Decrease in other assets		12,365			622			12,716			2,279
Decrease in other liabilities		(23,244	)		(4,017	)		(15,378	)		(97,550	)

Total adjustments		841			19,190			51,662			(24,198	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		67,424			65,817			142,791			36,571


Cash flows from investing activities:
Principal collected on loans		1,446,537			1,607,937			2,081,236			2,330,949
Loans originated		(1,948,093	)		(1,807,982	)		(2,858,266	)		(2,619,987	)
Purchase of loans		(116,864	)		(99,533	)		(373,997	)		(147,848	)
Proceeds from sale of loans		70,601			69,844			106,583			97,500
Proceeds from sale of repossessed assets		37,190			27,904			54,127			43,756
Purchase of servicing assets		(621	)		(1,036	)		(621	)		(1,614	)
Proceeds from sale of available for sale securities		389,784			3,125			389,784			408,285
Purchase of securities held to maturity		(99	)		(254,586	)		(99	)		(417,450	)
Purchase of securities available for sale		(3,351,675	)		—			(3,368,093	)		—
Principal repayments and maturities of securities held to maturity		1,489,215			318,094			1,551,272			392,480
Principal repayments of securities available for sale		165,658			112,921			255,425			163,959
Additions to premises and equipment		(15,088	)		(11,553	)		(21,663	)		(19,294	)
Proceeds from sale of other investment securities		9,342			—			9,474			—
Increase in other equity securities		(17,106	)		(3,419	)
Decrease (increase) in other equity securities								4,224			(20,520	)
Net cash inflow on acquisition of business		5,154			—			5,154			—

Net cash used in investing activities		(1,836,065	)		(38,284	)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities								(2,165,460	)		210,216


Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase in deposits		432,637			785,821			1,723,172			622,608
Net increase in loans payable								300,000			—
Net increase (decrease) in federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements		904,944			(421,961	)		232,290			(1,168,698	)
Net FHLB advances taken		357,000			65,000
Net FHLB advances (paid) taken								(117,000	)		445,000
Repayments of notes payable and other borrowings		—			(150,000	)		—			(150,000	)
Dividends paid		(33,088	)		(31,793	)		(49,633	)		(44,981	)
Issuance of common stock								—			91,967
Exercise of stock options		53			—			53			—

Net cash provided by financing activities		1,661,546			247,067
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities								2,088,882			(204,104	)

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(107,095	)		274,600
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents								66,213			42,683
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		378,945			568,811			378,945			568,811

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	271,850		$	843,411		$	445,158		$	611,494

Cash and cash equivalents include:
Cash and due from banks	$	122,979		$	134,955		$	151,040		$	138,037
Money market instruments		148,871			708,456			294,118			473,457

	$	271,850		$	843,411		$	445,158		$	611,494

FIRST BANCORP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Unaudited)


	Six-Month Period Ended						Nine-Month Period Ended
	June 30, 2008			June 30, 2007
(In thousands)							September 30, 2008			September 30, 2007
Preferred Stock	$	550,100		$	550,100		$	550,100		$	550,100


Common Stock outstanding:
Balance at beginning of period		92,504			83,254			92,504			83,254
Issuance of common stock								—			9,250
Common stock issued under stock option plan		6			—			6			—

Balance at end of period		92,510			83,254			92,510			92,504


Additional Paid-In-Capital:
Balance at beginning of period		108,279			22,757			108,279			22,757
Issuance of common stock								—			82,717
Shares issued under stock option plan		47			—			47			—
Stock-based compensation recognized		—			2,848			—			2,848

Balance at end of period		108,326			25,605			108,326			108,322


Legal Surplus		286,049			276,848			286,049			276,848


Retained Earnings:
Balance at beginning of period		409,978			326,761			409,978			326,761
Net income		66,583			46,627			91,129			60,769
Cash dividends declared on common stock		(12,950	)		(11,655	)		(19,426	)		(18,131	)
Cash dividends declared on preferred stock		(20,138	)		(20,138	)		(30,207	)		(30,207	)
Cumulative adjustment for accounting change (adoption of FIN 48)		—			(2,615	)		—			(2,615	)
Cumulative adjustment for accounting change (adoption of SFAS No. 159)		—			91,778			—			91,778

Balance at end of period		443,473			430,758			451,474			428,355


Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, net of tax:
Balance at beginning of period		(25,264	)		(30,167	)		(25,264	)		(30,167	)
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax		(53,501	)		(30,086	)		(21,923	)		(11,776	)

Balance at end of period		(78,765	)		(60,253	)		(47,187	)		(41,943	)


Total stockholders’ equity	$	1,401,693		$	1,306,312		$	1,441,272		$	1,414,186

FIRST BANCORP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE ~~(LOSS)~~ INCOME

(Unaudited)

Quarter Ended Six-Month Period Ended
June 30, June 30, June 30, June 30,
(In thousands) 2008 2007 2008 2007
Net income $ 32,994 $ 23,795 $ 66,583 $ 46,627

Other comprehensive loss:
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities:
Unrealized holding loss arising during the period (66,258 ) (32,018 ) (48,079 ) (33,886 )
Less: Reclassification adjustments for net loss (gain) and other-than-temporary impairments included in net income 679 1,436 (6,172 ) 3,595
Income tax benefit related to items of other comprehensive income 511 230 750 205

Other comprehensive loss for the period, net of tax (65,068 ) (30,352 ) (53,501 ) (30,086 )

Total comprehensive (loss) income $ (32,074 ) $ (6,557 ) $ 13,082 $ 16,541


	Quarter Ended					Nine-Month Period Ended
	September 30,		September 30,			September 30,			September 30,
(In thousands)	2008		2007			2008			2007
Net income	$	24,546	$	14,142		$	91,129		$	60,769

Other comprehensive gain (loss):
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities:
Unrealized holding gain (loss) arising during the period		30,773		15,364			(17,306	)		(18,522	)
Less: Reclassification adjustments for net loss (gain) and other-than-temporary impairments included in net income		696		3,119			(5,476	)		6,714
Income tax benefit (expense) related to items of other comprehensive income		109		(173	)		859			32


Other comprehensive gain (loss) for the period, net of tax		31,578		18,310			(21,923	)		(11,776	)


Total comprehensive income	$	56,124	$	32,452		$	69,206		$	48,993

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

FIRST BANCORP

PART I — NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

1 — BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) have been prepared in conformity with the accounting policies stated in the Corporation’s Audited Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in the financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted from these statements pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC and, accordingly, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2007, included in the Corporation’s 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K. All adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the statement of financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods have been reflected. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The results of operations for the quarter and ~~six-month~~nine-month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year.

Recently issued accounting pronouncements

On April 30, 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Staff Position No. (“FSP”) FIN 39-1 (“FSP FIN 39-1”), which amends FIN 39, “Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Contracts.” FSP FIN 39-1 impacts entities that enter into master netting arrangements as part of their derivative transactions by allowing net derivative positions to be offset in the financial statements against the fair value of amounts (or amounts that approximate fair value) recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral or the obligation to return cash collateral under those arrangements. FSP FIN 39-1 became effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Corporation analyzed the potential impact of FSP FIN 39-1 on its financial statements. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2008, the Corporation did not apply this pronouncement since FSP FIN 39-1 applies only to cash collateral and all of the collateral received or delivered to counterparties for derivative instruments are investment securities.

In November 2007, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. (“SAB”) 109, “Written Loan Commitments That Are Accounted For At Fair Value Through Earnings Under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” This interpretation expresses the views of the staff regarding written loan commitments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings under GAAP. SAB 109 supersedes SAB 105, “Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments,” which provided the prior views of the staff regarding derivative loan commitments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. (“SFAS”) 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” SAB 109 expresses the current view of the staff that, consistent with the guidance in SFAS 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets,” and SFAS 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities,” the expected net future cash flows related to the associated servicing of the loan should be included in the measurement of all written loan commitments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings. SAB 109 became effective for fiscal quarters beginning after December 15, 2007. The adoption of this statement in 2008 did not have an effect on the Corporation’s financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — an amendment of ARB No. 51.” This Statement amends ARB 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. It requires consolidated net income to be reported at amounts that include the amounts attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest. It also requires disclosure, on the face of the consolidated statement of income, of the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest. This Statement is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008 (that is, January 1, 2009, for entities with calendar year-ends). Earlier adoption is prohibited. The Corporation is currently evaluating the possible effect, if any, of the adoption of this statement on its financial statements, commencing on January 1, 2009.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141R, “Business Combinations.” This Statement retains the fundamental requirements in Statement 141 that the acquisition method of accounting (which Statement 141 called the purchase method) be used for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination. This Statement defines the acquirer as the entity that obtains control of one or more businesses in the business combination and establishes the acquisition date as the date that the acquirer achieves control. This Statement requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, including contingent liabilities, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values as of that date, with limited exceptions specified in the Statement. This Statement applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. An entity may not apply it before that date. The Corporation is currently evaluating the possible effect, if any, of the adoption of this statement on its financial statements.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.” This Statement changes the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS 133 and its related interpretations, and (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. Although the Corporation continues to evaluate the disclosure framework dictated by this Statement, most of the required disclosures are included in Note 8 — “Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.”

In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting ~~Principles,~~Principles.”. This Statement identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with GAAP. Prior to the issuance of SFAS 162, GAAP hierarchy was defined in the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Statement on Auditing Standards No. (“SAS”) 69, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” SFAS 162 provides and direct the GAAP hierarchy to the entities instead of the auditor as provided by SAS 69 because the entities (not ~~its auditor)~~their auditors) are responsible for selecting accounting principles for financial statements that are presented in conformity with GAAP. Any effect of applying the provisions of SFAS 162 should be reported as a change in accounting principle in accordance with SFAS 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.” SFAS 162 is effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” The adoption of SFAS 162 ~~will~~did not impact the Corporation’s current accounting policies or the Corporation’s financial results.

In May 2008, the FASB issued ~~FASB Staff Position No.~~FSP APB 14-1 (“~~FSP-APB~~FSP—APB 14-1”). FSP-APB 14-1 clarifies that convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion (including partial cash settlement) are not addressed by paragraph 12 of APB Opinion No. 14, “Accounting for Convertible Debt and Debt Issued with Stock Purchase Warrants.” Additionally, FSP-APB 14-1 specifies that issuers of such instruments should separately account for the liability and equity components in a manner that will reflect the entity’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when interest cost is recognized in subsequent periods. FSP-APB 14-1 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2008, the Corporation does not have any convertible debt instrument.

In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS 163, “Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts ~~- -~~— an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 60.” This Statement requires that an insurance enterprise recognize a claim liability prior to an event of default (insured event) when there is evidence that credit deterioration has occurred in an insured financial obligation. This Statement also clarifies how SFAS 60 applies to financial guarantee insurance contracts, including the recognition and measurement to be used to account for premium revenue and claim liabilities. SFAS 163 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and all interim periods within those fiscal years, except for some disclosures about the insurance enterprise’s risk-management activities. Except for those disclosures, earlier application of SFAS 163 is not permitted. The Corporation is currently evaluating the possible effect, if any, of the adoption of this statement on its financial statements, commencing on January 1, 2009.

In June 2008, the FASB issued ~~FASB Staff Position No.~~FSP EITF 03-6-1 (“FSP EITF 03-6-1”), “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities.” FSP EITF 03-6-1 applies to entities with outstanding unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to nonforfeitable dividends. Furthermore, awards with dividends that do not need to be returned to the entity, if the employee forfeits, the award are considered participating securities. Accordingly, under FSP EITF 03-6-1 unvested share-based payment awards that are considered to be participating securities should be included in the computation of EPS pursuant to the two-class method under SFAS 128. FSP EITF 03-6-1 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. Early application is not permitted. The Corporation is currently evaluating this statement in light of the recently approved Omnibus Incentive Plan, however, as of ~~June~~September 30, 2008, there are no outstanding unvested share-based payment awards.

In September 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4 (“FSP FAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4”), “Disclosures about Credit Derivatives and Certain Guarantees: An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 and FASB Interpretation No. 45; and Clarification of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 161.” FSP FAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4 amends SFAS 133 to require disclosures by sellers of credit derivatives, including credit derivatives embedded in a hybrid instrument. A seller of credit derivatives must disclose information about its credit derivatives and hybrid instruments that have embedded credit derivatives to enable users of financial statements to assess their potential effect on its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. As of September 30, 2008, the Corporation is not involved in the credit derivatives market. This FSP also amends FASB Interpretation No. (“FIN”) 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others,” to require an additional disclosure about the current status of the payment/performance risk of a guarantee. Further, this FSP clarifies the FASB’s intent about the effective date of SFAS 161. This FSP clarifies the FASB’s intent that the disclosures required by SFAS 161 should be provided for any reporting period (annual or quarterly interim) beginning after November 15, 2008. The provisions of this FSP that amend SFAS 133 and FIN 45 will be effective for reporting periods (annual or interim) ending after November 15, 2008. The adoption of this pronouncement will not have a significant impact on the Corporation’s financial statements.

In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-3 (“FSP FAS 157-3”), “Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active.” FSP FAS 157-3 clarifies the application of SFAS 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” in a market that is not active and provides an example to illustrate key considerations in determining the fair value of a financial asset when the market for that financial asset is not active. This FSP became effective on October 10, 2008 and also applies to prior periods for which financial statements have not been issued. The adoption of this pronouncement did not impact the Corporation’s fair value methodologies on its financial assets.

2 — EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

The calculations of earnings per common share for the quarters and ~~six-month~~nine-month periods ended on ~~June~~September 30, 2008 and 2007 are as follows:


	Quarter Ended						Six-Month Period Ended						Quarter Ended						Nine-Month Period Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						September 30,						September 30,
	2008			2007			2008			2007			2008			2007			2008			2007
	(In thousands, except per share data)												(In thousands, except per share data)
Net Income:
Net income	$	32,994		$	23,795		$	66,583		$	46,627		$	24,546		$	14,142		$	91,129		$	60,769
Less: Preferred stock dividends		(10,069	)		(10,069	)		(20,138	)		(20,138	)		(10,069	)		(10,069	)		(30,207	)		(30,207	)

Net income available to common stockholders	$	22,925		$	13,726		$	46,445		$	26,489		$	14,477		$	4,073		$	60,922		$	30,562


Weighted-Average Shares:
Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding		92,505			83,254			92,505			83,254			92,511			87,075			92,507			84,542
Average potential common shares		203			622			145			503			58			242			116			416

Diluted weighted-average number of common shares outstanding		92,708			83,876			92,650			83,757			92,569			87,317			92,623			84,958


Earnings per common share:
Basic	$	0.25		$	0.16		$	0.50		$	0.32		$	0.16		$	0.05		$	0.66		$	0.36

Diluted	$	0.25		$	0.16		$	0.50		$	0.32		$	0.16		$	0.05		$	0.66		$	0.36

rights for a payment of $0.2 million. On January 21, 2007, the 1997 stock option plan expired; all outstanding awards grants under this plan ~~shall~~ continue in full force and effect, subject to their original terms.

On April 29, 2008, the Corporation’s stockholders approved the First BanCorp 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Omnibus Plan”). The Omnibus Plan provides for equity-based compensation incentives (the “awards”) through the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, and other stock-based awards. This plan allows the issuance of up to 3,800,000 shares of common stock, subject to adjustments for stock splits, reorganization and other similar events. The Corporation’s Board of Directors, upon receiving the relevant recommendation of the Compensation Committee, ~~shall have~~has the power and authority to determine those eligible to receive awards and to establish the terms and conditions of any ~~awards; however, the Omnibus Plan has~~awards subject to various limits and vesting restrictions that apply to individual and aggregate awards. As of the date of the filing of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, no awards have been granted under the Omnibus Plan.

The Corporation accounted for stock options using the “modified prospective” method under SFAS 123R, “Share-Based Payment.” There were no stock options granted during the first ~~six~~nine months of 2008. The compensation expense associated with stock options for the ~~six-month~~nine-month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2007 was approximately $2.8 million. All employee stock options granted during 2007 were fully vested at the time of grant.

The activity of stock options during the first ~~six~~nine months of 2008 is set forth below:


										Nine Month Period Ended
										September 30, 2008
	Six-Month Period Ended														Weighted-
	June 30, 2008												Weighted-		Average		Aggregate
						Weighted-Average		Aggregate Intrinsic					Average		Remaining		Intrinsic
				Weighted-Average		Remaining Contractual		Value (In		Number of			Exercise		Contractual		Value (In
	Number of Options			Exercise Price		Term (Years)		thousands)		Options			Price		Term (Years)		thousands)
Beginning of period		4,136,910		$	12.60						4,136,910		$	12.60
Options exercised		(6,000	)		8.85						(6,000	)		8.85
Options cancelled		(121,000	)		9.03						(121,000	)		9.03

End of period outstanding and exercisable		4,009,910		$	12.71		6.6	$	—		4,009,910		$	12.71		6.3	$	4,231

4 — INVESTMENT SECURITIES

Investment Securities Available-for-Sale

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, approximate fair value, weighted-average yield and contractual maturities of investment securities available for sale as of ~~June~~September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were as follows:


	June 30, 2008										December 31, 2007										September 30, 2008										December 31, 2007
			Gross						Weighted				Gross						Weighted				Gross						Weighted				Gross						Weighted
	Amortized		Unrealized				Fair		average		Amortized		Unrealized				Fair		average		Amortized		Unrealized				Fair		average		Amortized		Unrealized				Fair		average
	cost		gains		losses		value		yield%		cost		gains		losses		value		yield%		cost		gains		losses		value		yield%		cost		gains		losses		value		yield%
	(Dollars in thousands)																				(Dollars in thousands)
U.S. Treasury and Obligations of U.S.Government sponsored agencies:
Due within one year	$	8,324	$	—	$	9	$	8,315		1.11	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—		—
U.S. Treasury and Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored agencies:
After 5 to 10 years		—		—		—		—		—		6,975		26		—		7,001		6.05	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—		—	$	6,975	$	26	$	—	$	7,001		6.05
After 10 years		—		—		—		—		—		8,984		47		—		9,031		6.21		—		—		—		—		—		8,984		47		—		9,031		6.21
Puerto Rico Government obligations:
Due within one year		387		4		—		391		6.63		—		—		—		—		—		4,584		51		—		4,635		6.17		—		—		—		—		—
After 1 to 5 years		13,688		122		325		13,485		4.96		13,947		141		347		13,741		4.99		10,606		60		337		10,329		4.51		13,947		141		347		13,741		4.99
After 5 to 10 years		7,309		222		100		7,431		5.67		7,245		247		99		7,393		5.67		6,292		192		73		6,411		5.80		7,245		247		99		7,393		5.67
After 10 years		17,755		74		97		17,732		5.30		3,416		37		66		3,387		5.64		15,782		24		544		15,262		5.30		3,416		37		66		3,387		5.64

United States and Puerto Rico Government obligations		47,463		422		531		47,354		4.53		40,567		498		512		40,553		5.62		37,264		327		954		36,637		5.27		40,567		498		512		40,553		5.62

Mortgage-backed securities:
FHLMC certificates:
Due within 1 year		93		—		—		93		5.19		98		1		—		99		5.50
Due within one year																						47		—		—		47		4.99		98		1		—		99		5.50
After 1 to 5 years		318		8		—		326		7.23		640		20		—		660		7.01		234		4		—		238		7.03		640		20		—		660		7.01
After 5 to 10 years																						31		3		—		34		8.41		—		—		—		—		—
After 10 years		1,984,413		243		28,732		1,955,924		5.45		158,070		235		111		158,194		5.60		1,957,623		2,001		10,826		1,948,798		5.45		158,070		235		111		158,194		5.60

		1,984,824		251		28,732		1,956,343		5.45		158,808		256		111		158,953		5.61		1,957,935		2,008		10,826		1,949,117		5.45		158,808		256		111		158,953		5.61

GNMA certificates:
Due within 1 year		132		1		—		133		5.83		—		—		—		—		—
Due within one year																						99		1		—		100		5.88		—		—		—		—		—
After 1 to 5 years		226		7		—		233		6.73		496		8		—		504		6.48		216		7		—		223		6.74		496		8		—		504		6.48
After 5 to 10 years		639		7		—		646		5.54		708		6		5		709		6.01		602		13		—		615		5.34		708		6		5		709		6.01
After 10 years		344,865		604		3,725		341,744		5.38		42,665		582		120		43,127		5.93		338,674		692		1,707		337,659		5.38		42,665		582		120		43,127		5.93

		345,862		619		3,725		342,756		5.38		43,869		596		125		44,340		5.94		339,591		713		1,707		338,597		5.38		43,869		596		125		44,340		5.94

FNMA certificates:
Due within one year		3		—		—		3		6.89		—		—		—		—		—
After 1 to 5 years		16		—		—		16		6.78		34		1		—		35		7.08		59		5		—		64		10.01		34		1		—		35		7.08
After 5 to 10 years		274,979		319		523		274,775		5.00		289,125		138		750		288,513		4.93		260,550		588		272		260,866		4.98		289,125		138		750		288,513		4.93
After 10 years		1,326,762		3,216		12,238		1,317,740		5.57		608,942		5,290		582		613,650		5.65		1,315,718		5,547		2,915		1,318,350		5.58		608,942		5,290		582		613,650		5.65

		1,601,760		3,535		12,761		1,592,534		5.47		898,101		5,429		1,332		902,198		5.42		1,576,327		6,140		3,187		1,579,280		5.48		898,101		5,429		1,332		902,198		5.42

Mortgage pass-through certificates:
After 10 years		151,201		2		36,013		115,190		4.72		162,082		3		28,407		133,678		6.14		146,941		2		37,217		109,726		5.64		162,082		3		28,407		133,678		6.14


Mortgage-backed securities		4,083,647		4,407		81,231		4,006,823		5.43		1,262,860		6,284		29,975		1,239,169		5.55		4,020,794		8,863		52,937		3,976,720		5.46		1,262,860		6,284		29,975		1,239,169		5.55

Corporate bonds:
After 5 to 10 years		1,300		—		510		790		7.70		1,300		—		198		1,102		7.70		1,300		—		780		520		7.70		1,300		—		198		1,102		7.70
After 10 years		4,412		—		1,796		2,616		7.97		4,412		—		1,066		3,346		7.97		4,411		—		2,534		1,877		7.97		4,412		—		1,066		3,346		7.97

Corporate bonds		5,712		—		2,306		3,406		7.91		5,712		—		1,264		4,448		7.91		5,711		—		3,314		2,397		7.91		5,712		—		1,264		4,448		7.91


Equity securities (without contractual maturity)		2,149		—		503		1,646		—		2,638		—		522		2,116		—		1,453		—		258		1,195		1.94		2,638		—		522		2,116		—


Total investment securities available for sale	$	4,138,971	$	4,829	$	84,571	$	4,059,229		5.42	$	1,311,777	$	6,782	$	32,273	$	1,286,286		5.55	$	4,065,222	$	9,190	$	57,463	$	4,016,949		5.46	$	1,311,777	$	6,782	$	32,273	$	1,286,286		5.55

The following tables show the Corporation’s available-for-sale investments’ fair value and gross unrealized losses, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, as of ~~June~~September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007:


	As of June 30, 2008												As of September 30, 2008
	Less than 12 months				12 months or more				Total				Less than 12 months				12 months or more				Total
			Unrealized				Unrealized				Unrealized				Unrealized				Unrealized				Unrealized
	Fair Value		Losses		Fair Value		Losses		Fair Value		Losses		Fair Value		Losses		Fair Value		Losses		Fair Value		Losses
	(In thousands)												(In thousands)
Debt securities
U.S. Treasury	$	8,315	$	9	$	—	$	—	$	8,315	$	9

Puerto Rico Government obligations		3,083		43		13,681		479		16,764		522	$	11,928	$	418	$	13,624	$	536	$	25,552	$	954
Mortgage-backed securities
FHLMC		1,864,111		28,647		3,160		85		1,867,271		28,732		1,766,133		10,785		3,115		41		1,769,248		10,826
GNMA		301,362		3,723		101		2		301,463		3,725		297,689		1,707		—		—		297,689		1,707
FNMA		1,199,440		12,761		38		—		1,199,478		12,761		880,477		3,186		21		1		880,498		3,187
Mortgage pass-through trust certificates		23,318		6,463		91,552		29,550		114,870		36,013		—		—		109,421		37,217		109,421		37,217
Corporate bonds		—		—		3,406		2,306		3,406		2,306		—		—		2,397		3,314		2,397		3,314
Equity securities		1,234		503		—		—		1,234		503		474		258		—		—		474		258

	$	3,400,863	$	52,149	$	111,938	$	32,422	$	3,512,801	$	84,571	$	2,956,701	$	16,354	$	128,578	$	41,109	$	3,085,279	$	57,463

mortgage-backed securities relates to mortgage loans bought to R&G Financial Corporation (“R&G Financial”). R&G Financial must cover losses up to 10% of the aggregate outstanding balance according to recourse provisions included in the agreements. The Corporation’s investment in equity securities is minimal and none is related to U.S. financial institutions that recently failed in the midst of the current market turmoil. The Corporation’s policy is to review its investment portfolio for possible other-than temporary impairment, at least quarterly. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2008, management has the intent and ability to hold these investments for a reasonable period of time and for a forecasted recovery of fair value up to (or beyond) the cost of these investments; as a result, ~~the impairments are considered temporary.~~there is no other-than temporary impairment.

For the ~~six-month~~nine-month periods ended on ~~June~~September 30, 2008 and 2007, the Corporation recorded other-than-temporary impairments of approximately ~~$0.5~~$1.2 million and ~~$2.9~~$5.2 million, respectively, on certain equity securities held in its available-for-sale investment portfolio. Management concluded that the declines in value of the securities were other-than-temporary; as such, the cost basis of these securities was written down to the market value as of the date of the analyses and reflected in earnings as a realized loss.

Total proceeds from the sale of securities available for sale during the ~~six-month~~nine-month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008 amounted to approximately $389.8 million (2007 — ~~$3.1~~$408.3 million). The Corporation realized gross gains of approximately $6.9 million and approximately $0.2 million in gross losses for the first ~~six~~nine months of 2008 (2007 — ~~$0.2~~$0.4 million in gross realized gains and approximately ~~$0.9~~$1.9 million in gross realized losses).

Investment Securities Held to Maturity

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, approximate fair value, weighted-average yield and contractual maturities of investment securities held-to-maturity as of ~~June~~September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were as follows:


	June 30, 2008										December 31, 2007										September 30, 2008										December 31, 2007
			Gross						Weighted				Gross						Weighted				Gross						Weighted				Gross						Weighted
	Amortized		Unrealized				Fair		average		Amortized		Unrealized				Fair		average		Amortized		Unrealized				Fair		average		Amortized		Unrealized				Fair		average
	cost		gains		losses		value		yield%		cost		gains		losses		value		yield%		cost		gains		losses		value		yield%		cost		gains		losses		value		yield%
	(Dollars in thousands)																				(Dollars in thousands)
U.S. Treasury securities:
Due within 1 year	$	100	$	—	$	—	$	100		2.36	$	254,882	$	369	$	24	$	255,227		4.14	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—		—	$	254,882	$	369	$	24	$	255,227		4.14

Obligations of other U.S. Government sponsored agencies:
After 10 years		966,927		888		2,576		965,239		5.77		2,110,265		1,486		2,160		2,109,591		5.82		948,904		—		10,563		938,341		5.77		2,110,265		1,486		2,160		2,109,591		5.82
Puerto Rico Government obligations:
After 5 to 10 years		17,608		520		103		18,025		5.85		17,302		541		107		17,736		5.85		17,765		469		103		18,131		5.85		17,302		541		107		17,736		5.85
After 10 years		13,895		—		1		13,894		5.50		13,920		—		256		13,664		5.50		5,155		—		195		4,960		5.50		13,920		—		256		13,664		5.50

United States and Puerto Rico Government obligations		998,530		1,408		2,680		997,258		5.77		2,396,369		2,396		2,547		2,396,218		5.64		971,824		469		10,861		961,432		5.77		2,396,369		2,396		2,547		2,396,218		5.64


Mortgage-backed securities:
FHLMC certificates:
After 1 to 5 years		9,790		—		150		9,640		3.82		—		—		—		—		—		9,098		—		123		8,975		3.81		—		—		—		—		—
After 5 to 10 years		—		—		—		—		—		11,274		—		116		11,158		3.65		—		—		—		—		—		11,274		—		116		11,158		3.65

FNMA certificates:
After 1 to 5 years		9,001		—		125		8,876		3.88		—		—		—		—		—		8,252		—		94		8,158		3.87		—		—		—		—		—
After 5 to 10 years		449,566		—		8,642		440,924		4.49		69,553		—		1,067		68,486		4.30		717,292		—		11,009		706,283		4.47		69,553		—		1,067		68,486		4.30
After 10 years		327,225		—		6,728		320,497		4.55		797,887		61		13,785		784,163		4.42		25,590		—		412		25,178		5.31		797,887		61		13,785		784,163		4.42

Mortgage-backed securities		795,582		—		15,645		779,937		4.50		878,714		61		14,968		863,807		4.40		760,232		—		11,638		748,594		4.48		878,714		61		14,968		863,807		4.40


Corporate bonds:
After 10 years		2,000		—		180		1,820		5.80		2,000		—		91		1,909		5.80		2,000		—		440		1,560		5.80		2,000		—		91		1,909		5.80


Total investment securities held-to-maturity	$	1,796,112	$	1,408	$	18,505	$	1,779,015		5.21	$	3,277,083	$	2,457	$	17,606	$	3,261,934		5.31	$	1,734,056	$	469	$	22,939	$	1,711,586		5.21	$	3,277,083	$	2,457	$	17,606	$	3,261,934		5.31

5 — OTHER EQUITY SECURITIES

Institutions that are members of the FHLB system are required to maintain a minimum investment in FHLB stock. Such minimum is calculated as a percentage of aggregate outstanding mortgages, and an additional investment is required that is calculated as a percentage of total FHLB advances, letters of credit, and the collateralized portion of interest-rate swaps outstanding. The stock is capital stock issued at $100 par value. Both stock and cash dividends may be received on FHLB stock.

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Corporation had investments in FHLB stock with a book value of ~~$80.6~~$59.2 million and $63.4 million, respectively. The estimated market value of such investments is its redemption value determined by the ultimate recoverability of its par value. Dividend income from FHLB stock for the ~~second~~third quarter and ~~six-month~~nine-month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008 amounted to ~~$1.1~~$1.0 million and ~~$2.3~~$3.2 million, respectively, compared to ~~$0.7~~$0.8 million and ~~$1.2~~$2.0 million, respectively, for the same periods in 2007.

The Corporation has other equity securities that do not have a readily available fair value. The carrying value of such securities as of ~~June~~September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was $1.6 million. During the first quarter of 2008, the Corporation realized a one-time gain of $9.3 million on the mandatory redemption of part of its investment in VISA, Inc., which completed its initial public offering (IPO) in March 2008.

6 — LOAN PORTFOLIO

The following is a detail of the loan portfolio:


	As of			As of			As of			As of
	June 30,			December 31,			September 30,			December 31,
	2008			2007			2008			2007
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Residential real estate loans, mainly secured by first mortgages	$	3,364,740		$	3,143,497		$	3,438,292		$	3,143,497


Commercial loans:
Construction loans		1,467,544			1,454,644			1,478,076			1,454,644
Commercial mortgage loans		1,324,509			1,279,251			1,422,899			1,279,251
Commercial loans		3,502,929			3,231,126			3,602,123			3,231,126
Loans to local financial institutions collateralized by real estate mortgages		591,674			624,597			579,305			624,597

Commercial loans		6,886,656			6,589,618			7,082,403			6,589,618


Finance leases		373,588			378,556			371,982			378,556


Consumer loans		1,595,867			1,667,151			1,787,915			1,667,151


Loans receivable		12,220,851			11,778,822			12,680,592			11,778,822
Allowance for loan and lease losses		(222,272	)		(190,168	)		(261,170	)		(190,168	)

Loans receivable, net		11,998,579			11,588,654			12,419,422			11,588,654
Loans held for sale		29,194			20,924			32,510			20,924

Total loans	$	12,027,773		$	11,609,578		$	12,451,932		$	11,609,578

8 — DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES

One of the ~~primary~~ market risks facing the Corporation is interest rate risk, which includes the risk that changes in interest rates will result in changes in the value of the Corporation’s assets or liabilities and the risk that net interest income from its loan and investment portfolios will change in response to changes in interest rates. The overall objective of the Corporation’s interest rate risk management activities is to reduce the variability of earnings caused by changes in interest rates.

The Corporation uses various financial instruments, including derivatives, to manage the interest rate risk related primarily to the values of its brokered certificates of deposit (“CDs”) and medium-term notes.

The Corporation designates a derivative as a fair value hedge, a cash flow hedge or an economic undesignated hedge when it enters into the derivative contract. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2008, all derivatives held by the Corporation were considered economic undesignated hedges. These undesignated hedges are recorded at fair value with the resulting gain or loss recognized in current earnings.

The following summarizes most of the derivative activities used by the Corporation in managing interest rate risk:

Interest rate swaps — Interest rate swap agreements generally involve the exchange of fixed and floating-rate interest payment obligations without the exchange of the underlying notional principal amount. Since a substantial portion of the Corporation’s loans, mainly commercial loans, yield variable rates, the interest rate swaps are utilized to convert fixed-rate brokered ~~certificates of deposit~~CDs (liabilities), mainly those with long-term maturities, to a variable rate and mitigate the interest rate risk inherent in these variable rate loans. Similar to unrealized gains and losses arising from changes in fair value, net interest settlements on interest rate swaps are recorded as an adjustment to interest income or interest expense depending on whether an asset or liability is being economically hedged.

Interest rate cap agreements — Interest rate cap agreements provide the right to receive cash if a reference interest rate rises above a contractual rate. The value increases as the reference interest rate rises. The Corporation enters into interest rate cap agreements to protect against rising interest rates. Specifically, the interest rate ofon certain private label mortgage pass-through securities and certain of the Corporation’s commercial loans to other financial institutions is generally a variable rate limited to the weighted-average coupon of the pass-through certificate or referenced residential mortgage collateral, less a contractual servicing fee.

Indexed options — Indexed options are generally over-the-counter (OTC) contracts that the Corporation enters into in order to receive the appreciation of a specified Stock Index (e.g., Dow Jones Industrial Composite Stock Index) over a specified period in exchange for a premium paid at the contract’s inception. The option period is determined by the contractual maturity of the notes payable tied to the performance of the Stock Index. The credit risk inherent in these options is the risk that the exchange party may not fulfill its obligation.

The following table summarizes the effect of derivative instruments on the Statement of Income for the quarter and ~~six-month~~nine-month periods ended on ~~June~~September 30, 2008 and 2007:


		Unrealized Gain or (Loss)													Unrealized Gain or (Loss)
	Location of Unrealized Gain or (Loss)	Quarter Ended						Six-Month Period Ended						Location of Unrealized Gain or (Loss)	Quarter Ended						Nine-Month Period Ended
	Recognized in Income on	June 30,						June 30,						Recognized in Income on	September 30,						September 30,
	Derivatives	2008			2007			2008			2007			Derivatives	2008			2007			2008			2007
		(In thousands)																			(In thousands)
Interest rate contracts:
Interest rate swap agreements used to hedge fixed rate:
Brokered certificates of deposit	Interest Expense on Deposits	$	(29,805	)	$	(81,839	)	$	25,552		$	(62,057	)
Interest rate swap agreements used to hedge fixed-rate:
Brokered CDs														Interest expense - Deposits	$	5,667		$	61,598		$	31,219		$	(459	)
Notes payable	Interest Expense on Notes payable and other borrowings		(247	)		569			(114	)		1,054		Interest expense - Notes payable and other borrowings		16			168			(98	)		1,222
Loans	Interest Income on Loans		2,548			1,518			40			1,278		Interest income - Loans		(136	)		(1,856	)		(96	)		(578	)
Written and purchased interest rate cap agreements — mortgage-backed securities	Interest Income on Investment Securities		3,041			4,890			857			4,480		Interest income - Investment Securities		(1,416	)		(4,464	)		(559	)		16
Written and purchased interest rate cap agreements — loans	Interest Income on Loans		54			159			23			(132	)	Interest income - Loans		(22	)		(130	)		1			(262	)
Equity contracts:
Embedded written and purchased options on stock index deposits	Interest Expense on Deposits		(129	)		154			(150	)		(1	)	Interest expense - Deposits		2			373			(148	)		372
Embedded written and purchased options on stock index notes payable	Interest Expense on Notes payable and other borrowings		(67	)		(145	)		113			(350	)	Interest expense - Notes payable and other borrowings		32			190			145			(160	)

Total Unrealized (Loss) Gain on derivatives		$	(24,605	)	$	(74,694	)	$	26,321		$	(55,728	)		$	4,143		$	55,879		$	30,464		$	151

Derivative instruments, such as interest rate swaps, are subject to market risk. The Corporation’s derivatives are mainly composed of interest rate swaps that are used to convert the fixed interest payment on its brokered CDs and medium-term notes to variable payments (receive fixed/pay floating). As is the case with investment securities, the market value of derivative instruments is largely a function of the financial market’s expectations regarding the future direction of interest rates. Accordingly, current market values are not necessarily indicative of the future impact of derivative instruments on earnings. This will depend, for the most part, on the shape of the yield curve as well as the level of interest rates. The unrealized gains and losses in the fair value of derivatives that economically hedge certain callable brokered CDs and medium-term notes are partially offset by unrealized gains and losses on the valuation of such economically hedged liabilities that were elected to be measured at fair value under the provisions of SFAS 159. The Corporation includes the gain or loss on those economically hedged liabilities (brokered CDs and medium-term notes) in the same line item as the offsetting loss or gain on the related derivatives as set forth below:

Quarter ended June 30,
2008 2007
Loss Gain Net Unrealized (Loss) / Gain Gain Net Unrealized
(In thousands) on Derivatives on SFAS 159 liabilities Loss on Derivatives on SFAS 159 liabilities (Loss) / Gain
Interest expense on Deposits $ (29,934 ) $ 28,462 $ (1,472 ) $ (81,685 ) $ 75,607 $ (6,078 )
Interest expense on Notes payable and other borrowings (314 ) 2 (312 ) 424 252 676


	Quarter ended September 30,
	2008							2007
	Gain		(Loss) Gain			Net Unrealized		Gain		(Loss) Gain			Net Unrealized
(In thousands)	on Derivatives		on SFAS 159 liabilities			Gain		on Derivatives		on SFAS 159 liabilities			(Loss) / Gain
Interest expense — Deposits	$	5,669	$	(791	)	$	4,878	$	61,971	$	(62,973	)	$	(1,002	)
Interest expense — Notes payable and other borrowings		48		961			1,009		358		483			841

Six-Month Period ended June 30,
2008 2007
Gain / (Loss) (Loss) / Gain Net Unrealized (Loss) / Gain Gain Net Unrealized
on Derivatives on SFAS 159 liabilities Gain on Derivatives on SFAS 159 liabilities (Loss) / Gain
Interest expense on Deposits $ 25,402 $ (21,095 ) $ 4,307 $ (62,058 ) $ 56,398 $ (5,660 )
Interest expense on Notes payable and other borrowings (1 ) 899 898 704 130 834


	Nine-Month Period ended September 30,
	2008							2007
	Gain		(Loss) / Gain			Net Unrealized		(Loss) / Gain			(Loss) Gain			Net Unrealized
	on Derivatives		on SFAS 159 liabilities			Gain		on Derivatives			on SFAS 159 liabilities			(Loss) / Gain
Interest expense — Deposits	$	31,071	$	(21,886	)	$	9,185	$	(87	)	$	(6,575	)	$	(6,662	)
Interest expense — Notes payable and other borrowings		47		1,860			1,907		1,062			613			1,675

9 — GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLES

Goodwill as of ~~June~~September 30, 2008 amounted to $28.1 million (December 31, 2007 — $28.1 million), and was recognized as part of “Other ~~Assets,~~Assets.” ~~resulting~~The goodwill resulted primarily from the acquisition of Ponce General Corporation in 2005. No goodwill impairment was recognized during 2008 and 2007. Goodwill and other indefinite life intangibles are reviewed periodically for impairment at least annually. Impairment review will be conducted during the fourth quarter of 2008.

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2008, the gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of core deposit intangibles was $45.8 million and ~~$20.0~~$20.9 million, respectively, recognized as part of “Other Assets” in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition (December 31, 2007 — $41.2 million and $18.3 million, respectively). The increase in the gross amount from December 2007 relates to the acquisition of the Virgin Islands Community Bank (“VICB”) on January 28, 2008. During the quarters ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008 and 2007, the amortization expense of core deposits amounted to $0.9 million and $0.8 million, respectively. For ~~each of~~ the ~~six-month~~nine-month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008 and 2007, the amortization expense of core deposits amounted to ~~$1.7 million.~~$2.6 million and $2.5 million, respectively.

10 — DEPOSITS

The following table summarizes deposit balances:


	As of		As of		As of		As of
	June 30,		December 31,		September 30,		December 31,
	2008		2007		2008		2007
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
Non-interest bearing checking account deposits	$	690,451	$	621,884	$	661,197	$	621,884
Savings accounts		1,252,217		1,036,662		1,353,211		1,036,662
Interest-bearing checking accounts		616,152		518,570		591,820		518,570
Certificates of deposit		1,868,615		1,680,344		1,845,731		1,680,344

Brokered certificates of deposit (includes $1,689,208 and $4,186,563 measured at fair value as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively)		7,100,349		7,177,061
Brokered CDs (includes $1,515,525 and $4,186,563 measured at fair value as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively)						8,367,873		7,177,061

	$	11,527,784	$	11,034,521	$	12,819,832	$	11,034,521

Total interest expense on deposits includes net cash settlements on interest rate swaps that economically hedge brokered CDs that for the quarter and ~~six-month~~nine-month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008 amounted to net interest realized of ~~$12.9~~$10.3 million and ~~$19.9~~$30.2 million, respectively (2007 — net interest incurred of ~~$3.5~~$3.4 million for the ~~second~~third quarter and ~~$7.3~~$10.8 million for the ~~six-month~~nine-month period).

11 — LOANS PAYABLE

As of September 30, 2008 loans payable consist of $300 million in short-term borrowings under the Federal Reserve (FED) Discount Window Program bearing interest at 2.25%. As of September 30, 2008, the Corporation had additional capacity of approximately $180 million on this credit facility based on collateral pledged at the FED, including the haircut reflecting the perceived risk associated with holding the collateral. Haircut refers to the percentage by which an asset’s market value is reduced for the purpose of collateral levels.

12 — FEDERAL FUNDS PURCHASED AND SECURITIES SOLD UNDER AGREEMENTS TO REPURCHASE

Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase (repurchase agreements) consist of the following:


	June 30,		December, 31		September 30,		December, 31
	2008		2007		2008		2007
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
Federal funds purchased, interest ranging from 4.50% to 5.12%	$	—	$	161,256	$	—	$	161,256
Repurchase agreements, interest ranging from 2.24% to 5.39% (2007 - 3.26% to 5.67%)		3,999,590		2,933,390
Repurchase agreements, interest ranging from 2.75% to 5.39% (2007 - 3.26% to 5.67%)						3,326,936		2,933,390

Total	$	3,999,590	$	3,094,646	$	3,326,936	$	3,094,646

As of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the securities underlying such agreements were delivered to the dealers with which the repurchase agreements were transacted.

Repurchase agreements as of September 30, 2008, grouped by counterparty, were as follows:


(Dollars in thousands)			Weighted-Average
Counterparty	Amount		Maturity (In Months)
Morgan Stanley	$	580,800		24
Credit Suisse First Boston		1,171,136		34
JP Morgan Chase		575,000		36
Barclays Capital		500,000		39
UBS Financial Services, Inc.		100,000		46
Citigroup Global Markets		400,000		59

	$	3,326,936

1213 — ADVANCES FROM THE FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK (FHLB)

Following is a detail of the advances from the FHLB:

June 30, December, 31
2008 2007
(In thousands)
Advances from FHLB, tied to 3-month LIBOR, with an average interest rate of 2.80% (2007 - 4.98%) $ 400,000 $ 400,000
Fixed-rate advances from FHLB, with a weighted-average interest rate of 3.11% (2007 - 4.58%) 1,060,000 703,000

Total $ 1,460,000 $ 1,103,000


	September 30,		December, 31
	2008		2007
	(In thousands)
Advances from FHLB, tied to 3-month LIBOR, with an average interest rate of 2.85% (2007 - 4.98%)	$	400,000	$	400,000
Fixed-rate advances from FHLB, with a weighted-average interest rate of 3.98% (2007 - 4.58%)		586,000		703,000

Total	$	986,000	$	1,103,000

Advances from FHLB mature as follows:


	June 30,		September 30,
	2008		2008
	(In thousands)		(In thousands)
One to thirty days	$	510,000	$	29,000
Over thirty to ninety days		—		400,000
Over ninety days to one year		514,000		115,000
One to three years		215,000		211,000
Three to five years		221,000		231,000

Total	$	1,460,000	$	986,000

1415 — OTHER BORROWINGS

Other borrowings consist of:

As of As of
June 30, December 31,
2008 2007
(In thousands)
Junior subordinated debentures due in 2034, interest-bearing at a floating-rate of 2.75% over 3-month LIBOR (5.56% as of June 30, 2008 and 7.74% as of December 31, 2007) $ 102,999 $ 102,951

Junior subordinated debentures due in 2034, interest-bearing at a floating-rate of 2.50% over 3-month LIBOR (5.30% as of June 30, 2008 and 7.43% as of December 31, 2007) 128,866 128,866

$ 231,865 $ 231,817


	As of		As of
	September 30,		December 31,
	2008		2007
	(In thousands)
Junior subordinated debentures due in 2034, interest-bearing at a floating-rate of 2.75% over 3-month LIBOR (5.57% as of September 30, 2008 and 7.74% as of December 31, 2007)	$	103,024	$	102,951

Junior subordinated debentures due in 2034, interest-bearing at a floating-rate of 2.50% over 3-month LIBOR (5.70% as of September 30, 2008 and 7.43% as of December 31, 2007)		128,866		128,866

	$	231,890	$	231,817

1516 — INCOME TAXES

Income tax expense includes Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands income taxes as well as applicable U.S. federal and state taxes. The Corporation is subject to Puerto Rico income tax on its income from all sources. As a Puerto Rico corporation, First BanCorp is treated as a foreign corporation for U.S. income tax purposes and is generally subject to United States income tax only on its income from sources within the United States or income effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the United States. Any such tax paid is creditable, within certain conditions and limitations, against the Corporation’s Puerto Rico tax liability. The Corporation is also subject to U.S. Virgin Islands taxes on its income from sources within this jurisdiction. Any such tax paid is creditable against the Corporation’s Puerto Rico tax liability, subject to certain conditions and limitations.

Under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code of 1994, as amended (“PR Code”), First BanCorp is subject to a maximum statutory tax rate of 39%. The PR Code also includes an alternative minimum tax of 22% that applies if the Corporation’s regular income tax liability is less than the alternative minimum tax requirements.

The Corporation has maintained an effective tax rate lower than the maximum statutory rate mainly by investing in government obligations and mortgage-backed securities exempt from U.S. and Puerto Rico income taxes and doing business through international banking entities (“IBEs”) of the Corporation and the Bank and through the Bank’s subsidiary, FirstBank Overseas Corporation, in which the interest income and gain on sales is exempt from Puerto Rico and U.S. income taxation. The IBEs and FirstBank Overseas Corporation were created under the International Banking Entity Act of Puerto Rico, which provides for total Puerto Rico tax exemption on net income derived by IBEs operating in Puerto Rico. ~~Since 2004,~~ IBEs that operate as a unit of a bank pay income taxes at normal rates to the extent that the IBEs’ net income exceeds 20% of the bank’s total net taxable income.

For the ~~six-month period ended June 30,~~first nine months of 2008, the Corporation recognized an income tax benefit of ~~$17.2~~$21.0 million compared to an income tax expense of ~~$12.4~~$18.0 million for the same period in 2007. The positive fluctuation on the financial results was mainly due to two ~~non-recurrent~~non-ordinary transactions: (i) a reversal of $10.6 million of Unrecognized Tax Benefits (“UTBs”) during the second quarter of 2008 for positions taken on income tax returns recorded under the provisions of ~~FASB Interpretation (“FIN”)~~FIN 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” as explained below, and (ii) the recognition of an income tax benefit of $5.4 million in connection with an agreement entered into with the Puerto Rico Department of Treasury during the first quarter of 2008 that establishes a multi-year allocation schedule for deductibility of the payment of $74.25 million made by the

Corporation during 2007 to settle the securities class action suit. Also, ~~higher deferred tax benefits were recorded in connection with a higher provision for loan and lease losses, and~~ the current income tax provision was lower, excluding the reversal of the FIN 48 contingency, due to ~~lower taxable~~higher tax-exempt income. A significant portion of the increase in revenues was associated with exempt operations conducted through the international banking entity, FirstBank Overseas Corporation.

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2008, the Corporation evaluated its ability to realize the deferred tax asset and concluded, based on the evidence available, that it is more likely than not that some of the deferred tax asset will not be realized and, thus, established a valuation allowance of $6.6 million, compared to a valuation allowance of $4.9 million as of December 31, 2007. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2008, the deferred tax asset, net of the valuation allowance of $6.6 million, amounted to approximately ~~$105.9~~$115.0 million compared to $90.1 million, net of the valuation allowance of $4.9 million as of December 31, 2007.

The Corporation adopted FIN 48 as of January 1, 2007. FIN 48 prescribes a comprehensive model for the financial statement recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of income tax uncertainties with respect to positions taken or expected to be taken on income tax returns. Under FIN 48, income tax benefits are recognized and measured based upon a two-step model: 1) a tax position must be more likely than not to be sustained based solely on its technical merits in order to be recognized, and 2) the benefit is measured as the largest dollar amount of that position that is more likely than not to be sustained upon settlement. The difference between the benefit recognized in accordance with FIN 48 and the tax benefit claimed on a tax return is referred to as an unrecognized tax benefit.

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2008, the balance of the Corporation’s UTBs amounted to ~~$15.1~~$15.6 million (excluding accrued interest), all of which would, if recognized, affect the Corporation’s effective tax rate. The Corporation classifies all interest and penalties, if any, related to tax uncertainties as income tax expense. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2008, the Corporation’s accrual for interest that relates to tax uncertainties amounted to ~~$6.0~~$6.4 million. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2008, there is no need to accrue for the payment of penalties. For the ~~six-month~~nine-month periods ended on ~~June~~September 30, 2008 and 2007, the total amount of interest recognized by the Corporation as part of income tax expense related with tax uncertainties was ~~$0.8~~$1.3 million and ~~$1.1~~$1.7 million, respectively. The amount of UTBs may increase or decrease in the future for various reasons, including changes in the amounts for current tax year positions, the expiration of open income tax returns due to the

statutes of limitations, changes in management’s judgment about the level of uncertainty, the status of examinations, litigation and legislative activity and the addition or elimination of uncertain tax positions. During the second quarter of 2008, the Corporation reversed UTBs by approximately $7.1 million and accrued interest of $3.5 million as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute of limitations for the 2003 taxable ~~year 2003.~~year. For the remaining outstanding UTBs, the Corporation cannot make any reasonably reliable estimate of the timing of future cash flows or changes, if any, associated with such obligations.

The Corporation’s liability for income taxes includes the liability for UTBs and interest which relate to tax years still subject to review by taxing authorities. Audit periods remain open for review until the statute of limitations has passed. The statute of limitations under the PR Code is 4 years, and under the Virgin Islands and U.S. income tax purposes is 3 years after a tax return is due or filed, whichever is later. The completion of an audit by the taxing authorities or the expiration of the statute of limitations for a given audit period could result in an adjustment to the Corporation’s liability for income taxes. Any such adjustment could be material to results of operations for any given quarterly or annual period based, in part, upon the results of operations for the given period. All tax years subsequent to 2003 remain open to examination under the PR Code and taxable years subsequent to 2004 remain open to examination for Virgin Islands and U.S. income tax purposes.

1617 — FAIR VALUE

Effective January 1, 2007, the Corporation adopted SFAS 157, ~~“Fair Value Measurement,”~~ which provides a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP.

The Corporation also adopted SFAS 159 effective January 1, 2007. SFAS 159 generally permits the measurement of selected eligible financial instruments at fair value at specified election dates. The Corporation

elected to adopt the fair value option for certain of its brokered CDs and medium-term notes (“SFAS 159 liabilities”) on the adoption date.

Fair Value Option

Callable Brokered CDs and Certain Medium-Term Notes

The Corporation elected ~~to account for at~~the fair value option for certain financial liabilities that were hedged with interest rate swaps that were previously designated for fair value hedge accounting in accordance with SFAS 133. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2008, these liabilities included callable brokered CDs with an aggregate fair value of ~~$1.69~~$1.52 billion and principal balance of ~~$1.70~~$1.53 billion recorded in interest-bearing deposits, and certain medium-term notes with a fair value of ~~$13.4~~$12.4 million and principal balance of $15.4 million recorded in notes payable. Interest ~~paid~~paid/accrued on these instruments is recorded as part of interest expense and the accrued interest is part of the fair value of the SFAS 159 liabilities. Electing the fair value option allows the Corporation to eliminate the burden of complying with the requirements for hedge accounting under SFAS 133 (e.g., documentation and effectiveness assessment) without introducing earnings volatility. Interest rate risk on the callable brokered CDs and medium-term notes measured at fair value under SFAS 159 continues to be economically hedged with callable interest rate swaps with the same terms and conditions. The Corporation did not elect the fair value option for the vast majority of other brokered CDs because these are not hedged by derivatives. Effective January 1, 2007, the Corporation discontinued the use of fair value hedge accounting for interest rate swaps that hedged a $150 million medium-term note since the interest rate swaps were no longer effective in offsetting the changes in the fair value of the $150 million medium-term note and, as a consequence, the Corporation did not elect the fair value option for this note either. The Corporation redeemed the $150 million medium-term note during the second quarter of 2007.

Callable brokered CDs and medium-term notes for which the Corporation has elected the fair value option are priced using observable market data in the institutional markets.

2830

Fair Value Measurement

SFAS 157 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. SFAS 157 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:


Level 1
Valuations of Level 1		assets and liabilities are obtained from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities. Level 1 assets and liabilities include equity securities that are traded in an active exchange market, as well as certain U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government and agency securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active markets. ~~Valuations are obtained from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities.~~


Level 2
Valuations of Level 2		~~Observable~~ assets and liabilities are based on observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; ~~quoted prices in markets that are not active;~~ or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 2 assets and liabilities include (i) mortgage-backed securities for which the fair value is estimated based on the value ~~for~~of identical or comparable assets, (ii) debt securities with quoted prices that are traded less frequently than exchange-traded instruments and (iii) derivative contracts and financial liabilities (e.g., callable brokered CDs and medium-term notes elected for fair value option under SFAS 159) whose value is determined using a pricing model with inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.


Level 3
Valuations of Level 3		~~Unobservable~~ assets and liabilities are based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.

The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value:

Callable Brokered CDs

The fair value of callable brokered CDs, which are included within deposits, is determined using discounted cash flow analyses over the full term of the CDs. The valuation uses a “Hull-White Interest Rate Tree” approach for the CDs with callable option components, an industry-standard approach for valuing instruments with interest rate call options. The model assumes that the embedded options are exercised economically. The fair value of the CDs is computed using the outstanding principal amount. The discount rates used are based on US dollar LIBOR and swap rates. At-the-money implied swaption volatility term structure (volatility by time to maturity) is used to calibrate the model to current market prices and value the cancellation option in the deposits.

Medium-Term Notes

The fair value of medium-term notes is determined using a discounted cash flow analysis over the full term of the borrowings. This valuation also uses the “Hull-White Interest Rate Tree” approach to value the option components of the term notes. The model assumes that the embedded options are exercised economically. The fair value of medium-term notes is computed using the notional amount outstanding. The

prices and value the cancellation option in the term notes. Effective January 1, 2007, the Corporation updated its methodology to calculate the impact of its own credit standing. The net gain from fair value changes attributable to the Corporation’s own credit to the medium-term notes for which the Corporation has elected the fair value option recorded for the ~~six-month~~nine-month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008 and 2007 amounted to ~~$0.9~~$1.8 million and ~~$1.0~~$1.6 million, respectively. The cumulative mark-to-market unrealized gain on the medium-term notes since the adoption of SFAS 159 attributed to credit risk amounted to ~~$2.6~~$3.5 million as of ~~June~~September 30, 2008. For the medium-term notes, the credit risk is measured using the difference in yield curves between Swap rates and Treasury rates at a tenor comparable to the time to maturity of the note and option.

Investment Securities

The fair value of investment securities is the market value based on quoted market prices, when available, or market prices for similar instruments. If listed prices or quotes are not available, fair value is based upon models that use unobservable inputs due to the limited market activity of the ~~instrument.~~instrument (Level 3) as is the case with certain private label mortgage-backed securities held by the Corporation. Unlike U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities, the fair value of these private label securities cannot be readily determined because they are not actively traded in securities markets. Significant information used for fair value determination is proprietary with regard to specific characteristics such as the prepayment model, which follows the amortizing schedule of the underlying loans, which is an unobservable input. Private label mortgage-backed securities are collateralized by fixed-rate mortgages on single-family residential properties in the United States and the market valuation is calculated by discounting the estimated net cash flows over the projected life of the pool of underlying assets using prepayment, default and interest rate assumptions that market participants would commonly use for similar mortgage asset classes that are subject to prepayment, credit and interest rate risk.

Derivative instruments

The fair value of the derivative instruments ~~was~~is based on observable market parameters and ~~take~~takes into consideration the Corporation’s own credit standing. The “Hull-White Interest Rate Tree” approach is used to value the option components of derivative instruments and the discounting of the cash flows is performed using US dollar LIBOR based discount rates. Certain derivatives with limited market activity are valued using models that consider unobservable market ~~parameters.~~parameters, as is the case with derivative instruments named as “reference caps” (Level 3). Reference caps are used to mainly hedge interest rate risk inherent on private label mortgage-backed securities, thus are tied to the notional amount of the underlying fixed-rate mortgage loans originated in the United States. Significant information used for fair value determination is proprietary with regards to specific characteristics such as the prepayment model which follows the amortizing schedule of the underlying loans, which is an unobservable input. The valuation model uses the Black formula, which is a benchmark standard in financial industry. The Black formula is similar to the Black-Scholes formula for valuing stock options except that the spot price of the underlying is replaced by the forward price. The Black formula uses as inputs the strike price of the cap, forward LIBOR rates, volatility estimates and discount rates to estimate the option value. LIBOR rates and swap rates used in the model are obtained from Bloomberg everyday and build zero coupon curve based on the Bloomberg LIBOR/Swap curve. The discount factor is then calculated from the zero coupon curve. The cap is the sum of all caplets. For each caplet, the rate is reset at the beginning of each reporting period and payments are made at the end of each period. The cash flow of a caplet is then discounted from each payment date.

Although most of the derivative instruments are fully collateralized, a credit spread is considered for those that are not secured in full. The cumulative mark-to-market effect of credit risk in the valuation of derivative instruments resulted in an unrealized gain of approximately $0.9 million as of September 30, 2008 (an immaterial

The table below presents a reconciliation for all assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the quarter and ~~six-month~~nine-month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008.

Level 3 Instruments Only Total Fair Value Measurements ( Quarter ended June 30, 2008) Total Fair Value Measurements ( Six-month period ended June 30, 2008)
(In thousands) Derivatives (1) Securities Available For Sale (2) Derivatives (1) Securities Available For Sale (2)
Beginning balance $ 2,888 $ 119,051 $ 5,103 $ 133,678
Total gains or (losses) (realized/unrealized):
Included in earnings 3,095 — 880 —
Included in other comprehensive income — 3,025 — (7,607 )
Principal repayments and amortization — (6,886 ) — (10,881 )

Ending balance $ 5,983 $ 115,190 $ 5,983 $ 115,190

Level 3 Instruments Only


	Total Fair Value Measurements						Total Fair Value Measurements
	(Quarter ended September 30, 2008)						(Nine-month period ended September 30, 2008)
(In thousands)	Derivatives (1)			Securities Available For Sale (2)			Derivatives (1)			Securities Available For Sale (2)
Beginning balance	$	5,982		$	115,190		$	5,102		$	133,678
Total gains or (losses) (realized/unrealized):
Included in earnings		(1,438	)		—			(558	)		—
Included in other comprehensive income		—			(1,203	)		—			(8,810	)
New instruments acquired		—			—			—			—
Principal repayments and amortization		—			(4,261	)		—			(15,142	)
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3		—			—			—			—

Ending balance	$	4,544		$	109,726		$	4,544		$	109,726


(1)		Amounts related to the valuation of interest rate cap agreements which were carried at fair value prior to the adoption of SFAS 159.

(2)		Amounts mostly related to certain private label mortgage-backed securities.

the reportable segments based on the internal reporting used to evaluate performance and to assess where to allocate resources. Other factors such as the Corporation’s organizational chart, nature of the products, distribution channels and the economic characteristics of the products were also considered in the determination of the reportable segments.

The Commercial and Corporate Banking segment consists of the Corporation’s lending and other services for large customers represented by the public sector and specialized and middle-market clients. The Commercial and Corporate Banking segment offers commercial loans, including commercial real estate and construction loans, and other products such as cash management and business management services. The Mortgage Banking segment’s operations consist of the origination, sale and servicing of a variety of residential mortgage loans. The Mortgage Banking segment also acquires and sells mortgages in the secondary markets. In addition, the Mortgage Banking segment includes mortgage loans purchased from other local banks or mortgage brokers. The Consumer (Retail) Banking segment consists of the Corporation’s consumer lending and deposit-taking activities conducted mainly through its branch network and loan centers. The Treasury and Investments segment is responsible for the Corporation’s investment portfolio and treasury functions executed to manage and enhance liquidity. This segment loans funds to the Commercial and Corporate ~~Banking;~~Banking, Mortgage ~~Banking;~~Banking, and Consumer (Retail) Banking segments to finance their lending activities and borrows from those segments. The Consumer (Retail) Banking segment also loans funds to other segments. The interest rates charged or credited by Treasury and Investments and the Consumer (Retail) Banking segments are allocated based on market rates. The difference between the allocated interest income or expense and the Corporation’s actual net interest income from centralized management of funding costs is reported in the Treasury and Investments segment. The Other category is mainly composed of insurance, finance leases and other products.

The following table presents information about the reportable segments (in thousands):


	Mortgage			Consumer			Commercial and			Treasury and									Mortgage			Consumer			Commercial and			Treasury and
	Banking			(Retail) Banking			Corporate			Investments			Other			Total			Banking			(Retail) Banking			Corporate			Investments			Other			Total
For the quarter ended June 30, 2008:
For the quarter ended September 30, 2008:
Interest income	$	47,455		$	40,022		$	85,666		$	71,254		$	32,211		$	276,608		$	47,786		$	45,577		$	83,226		$	79,222		$	32,481		$	288,292
Net (charge) credit for transfer of funds		(35,066	)		23,808			(49,502	)		64,451			(3,691	)		—			(36,071	)		16,968			(50,306	)		72,413			(3,004	)		—
Interest expense		—			(19,563	)		—			(114,004	)		(8,435	)		(142,002	)		—			(19,027	)		—			(115,946	)		(8,698	)		(143,671	)

Net interest income		12,389			44,267			36,164			21,701			20,085			134,606			11,715			43,518			32,920			35,689			20,779			144,621

Provision for loan and lease losses		(1,259	)		(14,414	)		(20,037	)		—			(5,613	)		(41,323	)		(1,295	)		(8,572	)		(32,694	)		—			(12,758	)		(55,319	)
Non-interest income (loss)		853			6,674			1,137			(587	)		3,925			12,002			1,260			7,779			1,210			(466	)		4,088			13,871
Direct non-interest expenses		(6,125	)		(25,546	)		(8,099	)		(1,586	)		(11,400	)		(52,756	)		(5,778	)		(25,643	)		(9,118	)		(1,596	)		(11,255	)		(53,390	)

Segment income	$	5,858		$	10,981		$	9,165		$	19,528		$	6,997		$	52,529
Segment income (loss)																			$	5,902		$	17,082		$	(7,682	)	$	33,627		$	854		$	49,783


Average earnings assets	$	2,909,308		$	1,720,661		$	5,992,390		$	5,487,619		$	1,357,393		$	17,467,371		$	2,998,292		$	1,902,188		$	6,092,228		$	5,944,814		$	1,401,779		$	18,339,301

For the quarter ended June 30, 2007:
For the quarter ended September 30, 2007:
Interest income	$	40,944		$	46,506		$	109,183		$	76,148		$	33,090		$	305,871		$	41,335		$	46,172		$	104,158		$	71,388		$	32,878		$	295,931
Net (charge) credit for transfer of funds		(30,933	)		26,202			(72,460	)		81,750			(4,559	)		—			(32,193	)		24,340			(74,318	)		89,581			(7,410	)		—
Interest expense		—			(19,921	)		—			(160,598	)		(8,137	)		(188,656	)		—			(20,719	)		—			(161,721	)		(8,462	)		(190,902	)

Net interest income (loss)		10,011			52,787			36,723			(2,700	)		20,394			117,215			9,142			49,793			29,840			(752	)		17,006			105,029

Provision for loan and lease losses		(1,237	)		(12,091	)		(8,171	)		—			(3,129	)		(24,628	)		(738	)		(14,019	)		(11,727	)		—			(7,776	)		(34,260	)
Non-interest income (loss)		372			6,275			1,272			(1,297	)		4,281			10,903			1,182			5,643			764			(2,977	)		4,233			8,845
Direct non-interest expenses		(5,114	)		(22,707	)		(3,658	)		(2,023	)		(11,230	)		(44,732	)		(5,684	)		(24,117	)		(6,254	)		(2,051	)		(12,005	)		(50,111	)

Segment income (loss)	$	4,032		$	24,264		$	26,166		$	(6,020	)	$	10,316		$	58,758		$	3,902		$	17,300		$	12,623		$	(5,780	)	$	1,458		$	29,503


Average earnings assets	$	2,527,577		$	1,835,842		$	5,401,162		$	5,369,401		$	1,307,741		$	16,441,723		$	2,585,239		$	1,811,466		$	5,434,273		$	5,705,114		$	1,327,513		$	16,863,605

2021 — FIRST BANCORP (Holding Company Only) Financial Information

The following condensed financial information presents the financial position of the Holding Company only as of ~~June~~September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 and the results of its operations for the quarters and ~~six-month~~nine-month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008 and 2007.


	As of		As of		As of		As of
	June 30,		December 31,		September 30,		December 31,
	2008		2007		2008		2007
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
Assets

Cash and due from banks	$	26,888	$	43,519	$	52,700	$	43,519
Money market investments		40,250		46,293		25,236		46,293
Investment securities available for sale, at market:
Mortgage-backed securities		—		41,234		—		41,234
Equity investments		1,647		2,117		1,195		2,117
Other investment securities		1,550		1,550		1,550		1,550
Loans receivable, net		—		2,597		—		2,597
Investment in FirstBank Puerto Rico, at equity		1,422,132		1,457,899		1,462,136		1,457,899
Investment in FirstBank Insurance Agency, at equity		5,982		4,632		5,088		4,632
Investment in Ponce General Corporation, at equity		109,994		106,120		109,324		106,120
Investment in PR Finance, at equity		2,678		2,979		2,719		2,979
Accrued interest receivable		—		376		—		376
Investment in FBP Statutory Trust I		3,093		3,093		3,093		3,093
Investment in FBP Statutory Trust II		3,866		3,866		3,866		3,866
Other assets		16,590		1,503		7,254		1,503

Total assets	$	1,634,670	$	1,717,778	$	1,674,161	$	1,717,778


Liabilities & Stockholders’ Equity

Liabilities:
Other borrowings	$	231,865	$	282,567	$	231,890	$	282,567
Accounts payable and other liabilities		1,112		13,565		999		13,565

Total liabilities		232,977		296,132		232,889		296,132

Stockholders’ equity		1,401,693		1,421,646		1,441,272		1,421,646

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,634,670	$	1,717,778	$	1,674,161	$	1,717,778


	Quarter Ended						Six-month Period Ended						Quarter Ended						Nine-month Period Ended
	June 30,			June 30,			June 30,			June 30,			September 30,			September 30,			September 30,			September 30,
	2008			2007			2008			2007			2008			2007			2008			2007
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)						(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Income:
Interest income on investment securities	$	57		$	852		$	790		$	1,435		$	282		$	826		$	1,072		$	2,261
Interest income on other investments		204			6			733			17			—			498			733			515
Interest income on loans		—			89			—			462			—			80			—			542
Dividend from FirstBank Puerto Rico		30,001			20,963			41,872			22,991			20,000			45,017			61,872			68,008
Dividend from other subsidiaries		—			—			2,500			1,000			1,500			—			4,000			1,000
Other income		93			141			213			279			98			142			311			421

		30,355			22,051			46,108			26,184			21,880			46,563			67,988			72,747


Expense:
Notes payable and other borrowings		3,126			4,670			7,389			9,340			3,287			4,747			10,676			14,087
Interest on funding to subsidiaries		—			843			550			1,708			—			842			550			2,550
(Recovery) Provision for loan losses		—			—			(1,398	)		1,320			—			—			(1,398	)		1,320
Other operating expenses		563			640			1,034			1,634			497			514			1,531			2,148

		3,689			6,153			7,575			14,002			3,784			6,103			11,359			20,105


Net loss on investments and impairments		(489	)		(1,437	)		(489	)		(3,595	)		(696	)		(2,370	)		(1,185	)		(5,965	)


Net loss on partial extinguishment and recharacterization of secured commercial loans to a local financial institution		—			—			—			(1,207	)		—			—			—			(1,207	)


Income before income taxes and equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries		26,177			14,461			38,044			7,380
Income before income taxes and equity in undistributed earnings (losses) of subsidiaries														17,400			38,090			55,444			45,470

Income tax (provision) benefit		(1	)		1,212			(546	)		2,501

Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries		6,818			8,122			29,085			36,746
Income tax benefit (provision)														—			1,619			(546	)		4,120
Equity in undistributed earnings (losses) of subsidiaries														7,146			(25,567	)		36,231			11,179


Net income	$	32,994		$	23,795		$	66,583		$	46,627		$	24,546		$	14,142		$	91,129		$	60,769

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (MD&A)

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
(In thousands, except for per share and financial ratios)


	Quarter ended					Six-month period ended					Quarter ended					Nine-month period ended
	June 30,					June 30,					September 30,		September 30,			September 30,
	2008		2007			2008		2007			2008		2007			2008		2007
Condensed Income Statements:
Total interest income	$	276,608	$	305,871		$	555,695	$	604,456		$	288,292	$	295,931		$	843,987	$	900,387
Total interest expense		142,002		188,656			296,631		369,806			143,671		190,902			440,302		560,708
Net interest income		134,606		117,215			259,064		234,650			144,621		105,029			403,685		339,679
Provision for loan and lease losses		41,323		24,628			87,116		49,542			55,319		34,260			142,435		83,802
Non-interest income		12,002		10,903			41,382		26,725			13,871		23,920			55,253		50,645
Non-interest expenses		81,763		73,454			163,950		152,818			82,376		74,952			246,326		227,770
Income before income taxes		23,522		30,036			49,380		59,015			20,797		19,737			70,177		78,752
Income tax benefit (provision)		9,472		(6,241	)		17,203		(12,388	)		3,749		(5,595	)		20,952		(17,983	)
Net income		32,994		23,795			66,583		46,627			24,546		14,142			91,129		60,769
Net income attributable to common stockholders		22,925		13,726			46,445		26,489			14,477		4,073			60,922		30,562
Per Common Share Results:
Net income per share basic	$	0.25	$	0.16		$	0.50	$	0.32		$	0.16	$	0.05		$	0.66	$	0.36
Net income per share diluted	$	0.25	$	0.16		$	0.50	$	0.32		$	0.16	$	0.05		$	0.66	$	0.36
Cash dividends declared	$	0.07	$	0.07		$	0.14	$	0.14		$	0.07	$	0.07		$	0.21	$	0.21
Average shares outstanding		92,505		83,254			92,505		83,254			92,511		87,075			92,507		84,542
Average shares outstanding diluted		92,708		83,876			92,650		83,757			92,569		87,317			92,623		84,958
Book value per common share	$	9.21	$	9.08		$	9.21	$	9.08		$	9.63	$	9.34		$	9.63	$	9.34
Tangible book value per common share											$	9.06	$	8.78		$	9.06	$	8.78
Selected Financial Ratios (In Percent):
Profitability:
Return on Average Assets		0.72		0.56			0.74		0.54			0.52		0.32			0.67		0.47
Interest Rate Spread (1)		2.92		2.34			2.78		2.35			3.03		2.15			2.87		2.28
Net Interest Margin (1)		3.28		2.88			3.19		2.91			3.37		2.67			3.25		2.83
Return on Average Total Equity		9.16		7.16			9.26		7.45			6.98		4.14			8.51		6.28
Return on Average Common Equity		10.29		7.05			10.46		7.55			6.76		1.99			9.26		5.50
Average Total Equity to Average Total Assets		7.91		7.76			8.04		7.31			7.39		7.78			7.81		7.47
Dividend payout ratio		28.25		42.46			27.88		44.00			44.73		159.00			31.89		59.33
Efficiency ratio (2)		55.77		57.33			54.57		58.47			51.97		58.13			53.67		58.35
Asset Quality:
Allowance for loan and lease losses to loans receivable		1.82		1.47			1.82		1.47			2.06		1.57			2.06		1.57
Net charge-offs (annualized) to average loans		0.97		0.75			0.91		0.77			0.79		0.77			0.87		0.77
Provision for loan and lease losses to net charge-offs		139.86		117.06			158.36		115.67			223.44		157.28			178.56		129.70
Non-performing assets to total assets		2.65		1.91			2.65		1.91			2.86		2.48			2.86		2.48
Non-accruing loans to total loans receivable		3.67		2.81			3.67		2.81			3.95		3.58			3.95		3.58
Allowance to total non-accruing loans		49.56		52.29			49.56		52.29			52.20		43.86			52.20		43.86
Allowance to total non-accruing loans, excluding residential real estate loans		101.85		98.45			101.85		98.45			103.83		85.24			103.83		85.24

Other Information:
Common Stock Price: End of period	$	6.34	$	10.99		$	6.34	$	10.99		$	11.06	$	9.50		$	11.06	$	9.50

ECONOMIC AND MARKET ENVIRONMENT

In recent weeks and months, the volatility and disruptions in the capital and credit markets have reached unprecedented levels. Bankruptcies and forced mergers of major investment banks and commercial banks in the United States, government bailouts of mortgage giants Fannie Mae (“FNMA”) and Freddie Mac (“FHLMC”), government support of the insurance company American International Group and increasing concerns about the ability of other financial institutions to stay capitalized have exacerbated the market disruptions and stress in the credit markets that have affected the economy over the past year. Following a series of market interventions to bail out particular firms, a $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program to stimulate economic growth and inspire confidence in the financial markets by the purchase of distressed assets and capitalization of the banking industry was signed into law on October 3, 2008. The legislation also increases the limit on deposit insurance at banks and credit unions and authorizes the Federal Reserve to pay interest on reserves. The credit market has remained tight despite passage of the rescue plan. Banks continue to hold cash to meet their own funding needs, wary of lending either to other banks or to businesses and individuals. The Federal Reserve has taken steps to support market liquidity by lowering the Federal Funds rate and the discount rate, encouraging banks to use their short-term lending windows and determining to provide a facility to increase the availability of commercial paper to eligible issuers. The central banks of Canada, England, Sweden and Switzerland and the European Central Bank have also announced reductions in policy interest rates.

As is the case with most commercial banks, the lack of liquidity in global credit markets may affect the Corporation’s access to regular and customary sources of funding. Also, the slowing economy and deteriorating housing market in the United States have required increased reserves on the Corporation’s loan portfolio, in particular on the $251 million loans originally disbursed as condo-conversion in the U.S. mainland. However, the Corporation is well capitalized and profitable and maintains sufficient liquidity to operate in a sound and safe manner. The Corporation has taken precautionary steps to enhance its liquidity positions and safeguard the access to credit by, among other things, increasing its borrowing capacity with the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) and the Federal Reserve (FED) through the Discount Window Program, the issuance of additional brokered CDs to increase its liquidity levels and the extension of the maturities of its borrowings to reduce exposure to high levels of market volatility.

The Corporation has not been active in subprime or adjustable rate mortgage loans (“ARMs”), nor has it been exposed to collateral debt obligations or other types of exotic products that aggravated the current financial crisis in the United States. More than 90% of the Corporation’s outstanding balance in its residential mortgage loan portfolio consists of fixed-rate, fully amortizing, full documentation loans and over 91% of the Corporation’s securities portfolio is invested in U.S. Government and Agency debentures and U.S. government sponsored-agency fixed-rate mortgage-backed securities (mainly FNMA and FHLMC fixed-rate securities). In connection with the placement of FNMA and FHLMC into conservatorship by the U.S. Treasury in September 2008, the Treasury entered into agreements to invest up to approximately $100 billion in each agency to, among other things, protects debt and mortgage-backed securities of the agencies. As of September 30, 2008 the Corporation has $4.3 billion and $0.9 billion in FNMA and FHLMC mortgage-backed securities and debt securities, respectively, representing approximately 85% of the total investment portfolio. The Corporation’s investment in equity securities is minimal and none of its equity securities is related to U.S. financial institutions that recently failed. Also, as part of its credit risk management, the Corporation maintains strict and conservative underwriting guidelines, diversifies the counterparties used and monitors the concentration of risk to limit its counterparty exposure. As of September 30, 2008, the Corporation’s unsecured counterparty exposure to the Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. bankruptcy filing is approximately $1.4 million, which has been reserved and relates to interest rate swaps agreements. For more information on current exposure with respect to the Corporation’s derivative instruments and outstanding repurchase agreements by counterparty, management of liquidity risk and current liquidity levels, see the “Risk Management” discussion below and Notes 20 and 12 to the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements .

The Corporation’s principal market is Puerto Rico. Although affected by the economic situation in the United States, Puerto Rico’s economy has been in a recession since early 2006 due to several local conditions including budget shortfalls, diminished consumer buying power driven by increases in utility costs, gasoline prices, and highway toll charges, the implementation of sales taxes, and periodic impasses between the Executive and the Legislature branches of the government. The above conditions together with a recession looming also in the U.S. mainland and rising food prices will continue to adversely affect the economy in Puerto Rico.

The Corporation has seen stress in the credit quality of, and worsening trends affecting its construction loan portfolio, in particular condo conversion loans in the U.S. mainland (mainly in the state of Florida) affected by the continuing deterioration in the health of the economy, an oversupply of new homes and declining housing prices in the United States. To a lesser extent, the Corporation also increased its reserves for the residential mortgage and construction loan portfolio from the 2007 level to account for the increased credit risk tied to recessionary conditions in Puerto Rico’s economy. Nevertheless, the Puerto Rico housing market has not seen the dramatic decline in housing prices that is affecting the U.S. mainland but there is a lower demand due to the diminished consumer’s acquisition power. Recent decreases in oil prices should provide a relief to consumers and should immediately impact consumers’ purchasing power positively. In addition, since 2005 the Corporation has taken actions and implemented initiatives designed to strengthen the Corporation’s credit policies as well as loss mitigation initiatives that have begun to have the desired effects as reflected by a decrease in non-performing consumer loans and consumer loans charge-offs and a relative stability in non-performing residential mortgage loans. The degree of the impact of economic conditions on the Corporation’s financial results is dependent upon the duration and severity of the aforementioned conditions. As an example, the credit risk is affected by a deteriorating economy to the extent that the borrowers’ spending capacity is decreased and, as a result, may not be able to make their payments when due. A deteriorating economy could also lead to a decline in real estate values and therefore the reduction of the borrowers’ capacity to refinance loans and increase the Corporation’s exposure to loss upon default. For more information on credit quality, see the “Risk Management — Non-performing Assets and Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses” discussion below.

OVERVIEW OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This discussion and analysis relates to the accompanying consolidated interim unaudited financial statements of First BanCorp and should be read in conjunction with the interim unaudited financial statements and the notes thereto.

First BanCorp’s results of operations depend primarily upon its net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income earned on its interest-earning assets, including investment securities and loans, and the interest expense on its interest-bearing liabilities, including deposits and borrowings. Net interest income is affected by various factors, including: the interest rate scenario; the volumes, mix and composition of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities; and the re-pricing characteristics of these assets and liabilities. The Corporation’s results of operations also depend on the provision for loan and lease losses, non-interest expenses (such as personnel, occupancy and other costs), non-interest income (mainly ~~insurance income and~~ service charges and fees on loans and ~~deposits)~~deposits and insurance income), the results of its hedging activities, gains (losses) on investments, gains (losses) on sale of loans, and income taxes.

Net income for the quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008 amounted to ~~$33.0~~$24.5 million or ~~$0.25~~$0.16 per diluted common share, compared to ~~$23.8~~$14.1 million or ~~$0.16~~$0.05 per diluted common share for the quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2007. The Corporation’s financial performance for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008, as compared to the ~~second~~third quarter of 2007, was principally impacted by ~~the following factors: (1)~~ an increase of ~~$17.4~~$39.6 million in net interest ~~income due to a decrease~~income. By being liability sensitive, (which in general terms means that interest bearing liabilities reprice faster than interest earning assets) the ~~average cost of funds resulting~~Corporation benefited from lower short-term interest rates ~~coupled with changes in the mix and volume of the Corporation’s balance sheet, and (2) an income tax benefit of $9.5 million recorded for the second quarter,~~on its interest-bearing liabilities as compared to ~~an income tax expense~~rate

levels during the third quarter of $6.2 million for the same period a year ago, mainly in connection to the reversal of $10.6 million of Unrecognized Tax Benefits (“UTBs”) for positions taken on income tax returns recorded under the provisions of Financial Interpretation No. (“FIN”) 48. These factors were2007. This was partially offset byby: (i) an increase of ~~$16.7~~$21.1 million in the provision for loan and lease losses due to ~~additional~~a higher volume of impaired construction and commercial loans, increases in reserves ~~allocated to certain impaired commercial and construction loans as well as increases to the reserve factors~~ for potential losses inherent in the loan portfolio associated with weakening economic conditions, ~~in Puerto Rico~~ and the ~~slowdown in the United States housing sector and the overall increase in the volume~~growth of the ~~portfolio.~~Corporation’s total loan portfolio (ii) a decrease of $10.0 million in non-interest income that reflects the impact on the third quarter results of 2007 of income of $15.1 million recorded in connection with an agreement reached with insurance carriers and former executives for indemnity of expenses related to the class action lawsuit brought against the Corporation that was settled in 2007, and (iii) an increase of $7.4 million in non-interest expenses mainly due to higher foreclosure-related expenses. A lower current income tax provision due to higher tax-exempt income resulted in an income tax benefit of $3.7 million for the third quarter of 2008, compared to an income tax expense of $5.6 million recorded for the same period a year ago.

The highlights and key drivers of the Corporation’s financial results for the quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008 ~~included~~include the following:

	•		Net interest income for the quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008 was ~~$134.6~~$144.6 million, compared to ~~$117.2~~$105.0 million for the same period in 2007. The net interest spread and margin, on an adjusted tax equivalent basis, for the quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008 were ~~2.92%~~3.03% and ~~3.28%~~3.37%, respectively, compared to ~~2.34%~~2.15% and ~~2.88%~~2.67%, respectively, for the same period in 2007. The increase in net interest income is mainly associated with a higher interest rate spread and margin ~~was mainly associated with~~due to a decrease in the average cost of funds resulting from lower short-term interest rates and ~~changes in the mix and~~to a lesser extent a higher volume of ~~the~~interest earning assets. The Corporation’s liability sensitive balance ~~sheet. The current interest rate scenario~~sheet position has allowed the Corporation to ~~replace brokered certificates~~benefit from lower short-term interest rates as compared to rate levels during the third quarter of ~~deposit (“CDs”) that matured or were called during 2008~~2007. The decrease in funding costs associated with lower rates brokered CDs that are not hedged with interest rate swaps and, to a lesser extent, with other low cost borrowings such as Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances. Most of the brokered CDs called in 2008 were hedged with interest rate swaps. By reducing the exposure to swapped-to-floating interest rate swaps that hedge brokered CDs, the Corporation locked-inshort-term interest rates ~~for longer periods, thus reducing interest~~was partially offset by lower loan yields due to the repricing of variable rate ~~risk.~~construction and commercial loans tied to short-term indexes and the increase in non-accrual loans as compared to 2007 volumes.

			~~Furthermore, given market opportunities, the Corporation increased the volume of~~Average earning assets ~~through~~for the ~~purchased, during the second~~third quarter of 2008 increased by approximately $1.6 billion as compared to the same period in 2007. Average loans increased by $1.3 billion driven by the growth in internal originations, in particular commercial and residential real estate loans, and to a lesser extent purchases of loans, including the acquisition of a $218 million auto loan portfolio during the third quarter of 2008 that contributed to a wider interest rate spread. In addition, the Corporation purchased approximately ~~$2.2~~$3.2 billion in U.S. government ~~agency~~agencies fixed-rate mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) athaving an average yield of ~~5.50%,~~5.44% during the first half of 2008, which is ~~significantly~~ higher than the cost of borrowings required to finance the purchase of such assets; thus contributing to a higher net

interest ~~income. Average earning assets for the second quarter of 2008 increased by approximately $1.1 billion~~income as compared to ~~the same period in~~ 2007. Refer to the “Net Interest Income” discussion below for additional information.


	•		For the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008, the Corporation’s provision for loan and lease losses amounted to ~~$41.3~~$55.3 million, compared to ~~$24.6~~$34.3 million for the same period in 2007. Refer to the discussion under the “Risk Management” section below for an analysis of the allowance for loan and lease losses and non-performing assets and related ratios. The increase in the provision for 2008 was primarily due to ~~additional reserves allocated to certain~~a higher volume of impaired construction and commercial ~~and construction~~ loans, ~~as well as~~ increases to the reserve factors for potential losses inherent in the loan portfolio associated with the weakening economic conditions in the United States and Puerto Rico, and the ~~slowdown~~overall growth of the loan portfolio.

			The Corporation has seen stress in the credit quality of, and worsening trends affecting its construction loan portfolio, in particular condo-conversion loans in the U.S. mainland (mainly in the state of Florida) affected by the continuing deterioration in the health of the economy, an oversupply of new homes and declining housing prices in the United States. The total exposure of the Corporation to loans originally disbursed as condo-conversion loans in the United States ~~housing sector. Additional~~is approximately $251 million or 2% of the

			total loan portfolio. A total of approximately $182.2 million of this condo conversion portfolio is considered impaired under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. (“SFAS”) 114, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan,” with a specific reserve of $31.4 million allocated to these impaired loans. With respect to the United States mainland market, the Corporation recorded approximately $16.7 million in additional reserves ~~recorded~~for impaired loans during the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008, including $9.6 million for ~~new~~a condo-conversion loan in Miami, Florida with an outstanding principal balance of $52.6 million. For the third quarter of 2007, approximately $8.1 million was recorded as a specific reserve for a previously reported impaired relationship tied to the Miami Corporate Banking operations in the U.S. mainland. With respect to the Puerto Rico market, specific reserves of approximately $17.9 million were allocated to commercial and construction loans ~~classified~~that were identified as impaired ~~amounted to approximately $17.7 million. The growth~~loans during the third quarter of ~~the Corporation’s residential and commercial mortgage loan portfolio also contributed to the increase in the provision for loan and lease losses.~~2008.

	•		For the quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008, the Corporation’s non-interest income amounted to ~~$12.0~~$13.9 million, compared to ~~$10.9~~$23.9 million for the quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2008.~~2007. The ~~increase~~financial results for the third quarter of 2007 include an income recognition of $15.1 million in connection with an agreement reached with insurance carriers and former executives for indemnity of expenses related to the class action lawsuit brought against the Corporation that was settled in 2007. Excluding this transaction, non-interest income ~~was~~increased by $5.0 million, as compared to the third quarter of 2007 due to a combination of factors, including lower other-than-temporary impairment charges on equity securities, an increase in point of sale (POS) and ATM interchange fee income, and ~~a recovery~~an increase in ~~value of servicing rights.~~fee income from cash management services provided to corporate customers. Refer to the “Non Interest Income” discussion below for additional information.

	•		Non-interest expenses for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008 amounted to ~~$81.8~~$82.4 million, compared to ~~$73.5~~$75.0 million for the same period in 2007. The increase in non-interest expenses for 2008 was mainly due to an increase of approximately ~~$2.9~~$5.0 million in foreclosure-related expenses, mainly ~~maintenance, insurance, repairs~~due to a higher inventory of repossessed properties and ~~legal expenses for~~charges in connection with valuation adjustments and realized losses on the sale of foreclosed properties in ~~the Miami Agency,~~Puerto Rico, together with an increase ~~of $2.0 million~~in repairs, legal expenses and management fees paid in connection with foreclosures of properties in the ~~new assessment system adopted by~~United States (mainly condo conversion projects in the ~~FDIC effective in 2007,~~state of Florida). Furthermore, higher non-interest expenses was related to: (i) an increase of $1.6 million in employees’ compensation and benefit expenses due to higher average compensation and related benefits, (ii) an increase of $1.1 million in business promotion expenses to support initiatives directed to increase the Corporation’s deposit base and amortgage loan originations, and (iii) an increase of $1.0 million ~~increase~~and $0.7 million in data processing fees and occupancy and equipment expenses, respectively, to support the expansion of the Corporation’s operations. Refer to the “Non Interest Expenses” discussion below for additional information.

	•		For the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008, the ~~Corporation’s~~Corporation recorded an income tax benefit ~~amounted to $9.5~~of $3.7 million, compared to an income tax expense of ~~$6.2~~$5.6 million for the same period in 2007. The ~~positive~~ fluctuation ~~on the financial results was~~is mainly ~~due~~related to the reversal of $10.6 million of UTBs for positions taken on income tax returns recorded under the provision of FIN 48 because of the lapse of the statute of limitations. Also, higher deferred tax benefits were recorded in connection with a ~~higher provision for~~

			Corporation increased its cash and money market investments by $66.2 million in part as a precautionary measure given the ~~increase~~current crisis in ~~total assets, as compared to~~ the ~~balance as of December 31, 2007, was related to the increase in loan portfolio of $450.3 million (before the allowance for loan and lease losses) driven by new originations.~~financial markets.

	•		As of ~~June~~September 30, 2008, total liabilities amounted to ~~$17.4~~$17.9 billion, an increase of approximately ~~$1.6~~$2.1 billion as compared to $15.8 billion as of December 31, 2007. The increase in total liabilities was mainly ~~attributed to a higher volume of securities sold under repurchase agreements aligned with the increase in MBS. In addition, total liabilities increased due~~attributable to a higher volume of deposits, ~~an increase~~as the Corporation has been issuing brokered CDs to finance its lending activities, pay off repurchase agreements issued to finance the purchase of ~~$493.3~~MBS in the first half of 2008, accumulate additional liquidity due to current market volatility and extend the maturity of its borrowings. Total deposits, excluding brokered CDs, increased by $594.5 million ~~compared to~~from the balance as of December 31, 2007. ~~Other sources of~~Refer to “Risk management — Liquidity and Capital Adequacy” discussion below for additional information about the Corporation’s funding including FHLB advances increased by $357.0 million, as compared to December 31, 2007, reflecting the use of alternative sources to replace brokered CDs that matured or were called and to finance lending activities.sources.

	•		Total loan production, including purchases, for the quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008 was ~~$1.0~~$1.2 billion, compared to ~~$932.8~~$860.3 million for the comparable period in 2007. The increase in loan production during 2008, as compared to the ~~second~~third quarter of 2007, was mainly ~~due to increases~~associated with the purchase of a $218 million auto loan portfolio. In addition, there was an increase of $139.2 million in commercial ~~and residential real estate mortgage~~ loan originations of $141.2 million and $54.2 million, respectively. Among other things, residential mortgage loan originations in Puerto Rico were favorably affected by recent legislation approved by the Puerto Rico Government (Act 197) which provides credits when individuals purchase certain new or existing homes. Loan originations of the Corporation covered by Act 197 amounted to approximately $31.3 million for the second quarter of 2008. The increase in commercial and residential mortgage loan originations was partially offset by a lower loan production of consumer loans, which was negatively impacted by worsening economic conditions in Puerto Rico.originations.

	•		Total non-performing ~~loans~~assets as of ~~June~~September 30, 2008 amounted to ~~$448.5~~$552.9 million compared to ~~$413.1~~$439.3 million as of December 31, 2007. The slowing economy and deteriorating housing market in the United States coupled with recessionary conditions in Puerto Rico’s economy have resulted in higher non-performing balances in most of the Corporation’s loan portfolios. Total non-performing assets in the United States increased by $23.0 million. With regards to the United States portfolio, two condo conversion loans totaling approximately $17.5 million were classified as non-performing during 2008. Also in Florida, two commercial mortgage loans totaling $12.9 million contributed to the increase in ~~non-performing~~non-accrual loans. The balance of non-accruing residential mortgage loans was ~~mainly related to~~also adversely affected by deteriorating economic conditions in the ~~commercial loan portfolio (other than construction loans) and~~United States, which accounted for $9.9 million of the ~~residential mortgage loan portfolio, which increased by $53.7 million and $21.2 million, respectively, partially offset by lower construction and consumer loans in non-accrual status. The~~ increase in non-accruing ~~commercial loans is related~~residential mortgages as compared to continuing adverse economic conditions in Puerto Rico that caused the classification as non-accrual during the first half of 2008 of several commercial loans originated in Puerto Rico, mainly secured by land and real estate properties,including $24.6 million of new commercial loans identified as impaired during 2008. Also, there was a classification as non-accrual during the second quarter of 2008 of a participation in a syndicated commercial loan in the U.S. Virgin Islands with a carrying value of $13.0 millionbalances as of June 30, 2008, net of a $9.1 million charge-off recorded in the second quarter of 2008. The charge-off was lower than the reserve amount of $11.9 million provided for during the first quarter of 2008, as the loss in this relationship will be lower than originally estimated given recent negotiations for the settlement of the loan.December 31, 2007.

			~~The decrease~~Partially offsetting the increase in ~~non-accruing construction~~non-performing loans and assets in the United States was ~~principally related to~~ the sale, during the first half of 2008, of one ~~of the~~ impaired ~~loans~~condo conversion loan in ~~an impaired~~a single relationship ~~in the~~on its Miami ~~Agency. This relationship was originally identified as impaired during the second quarter of 2007 as reported in previous periodic filings of the Corporation.~~Corporate Banking operations portfolio. The loan’s carrying amount was $21.8 million (net of an impairment of $2.4 million), and the loan was sold for $22.5 million. Also, during the first half of 2008, the Corporation added approximately $18.6 million to its other real estate owned (OREO) portfolio, as a result of collateral repossessed in settlement of two other loans in this impaired relationship. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2008, and as a result of the transactions completed during the fourth quarter of 2007 and first half of 2008, there were no outstanding loans associated with this relationship. Refer to “Risk Management — Non-accruing and Non-performing Assets” section below for additional information about non-performing assets in the United States.

			In Puerto Rico, non-performing assets increased by $93.0 million from balances as of December 31, 2007 driven by increases in the residential and commercial non-performing loan portfolio. The increase in non-accruing commercial loans is related to continuing adverse economic conditions in Puerto Rico, including the classification as non-accrual of approximately $33.1 million impaired commercial loans identified during 2008. Increases in the Puerto Rico’s non-accruing construction loans portfolio was driven by the classification as non-accrual of a $15.2 million impaired loan extended for land development and construction of a residential housing project in Puerto Rico. The weakening economic conditions in Puerto Rico have also affected the volume of non-performing residential mortgage loans, which increased by $28.2 million; however, the non-performing to total loan ratio for this portfolio remained flat. The relative stability of non-performing residential loans in Puerto Rico reflects, to some extent, the positive impact of loans modified through the loan loss mitigation program that begun in the third quarter of 2007.

4145

With respect to the U.S. Virgin Islands, a third party purchased, during the third quarter of 2008, ~~there were no~~the outstanding ~~loans associated with this relationship~~debt related to a syndicated commercial loan in the ~~Miami Agency. The reduction to $18.6 million held~~U.S. Virgin Islands on which the Corporation had a participation and that was placed in non-accrual in the ~~OREO portfolio, net~~second quarter of ~~charge-offs~~2008. The purchase agreement provided a full release of ~~$4.2~~the borrower’s obligation to the participant banks, thus the carrying value of approximately $13.0 million on this participation was taken out of non-accrual during the third quarter of 2008. On September 15, 2008, the Corporation collected approximately $ 6.5 million from this borrower. The remaining balance of approximately $ 6.5 million is a significant decrease in the balance of this impaired relationship from the $60.5 million balance when it was identified as impaired during the first half of 2007. As of the date of the filing of this Form 10-Q, the Corporation has identified interested purchasers for the two foreclosed properties. However, the Corporation cannot predict whether the properties will be ultimately sold to these parties.due on January 14, 2009.


			The ~~decrease in~~ non-accruing consumer loan portfolio, mainly composed of Puerto Rico loans, ~~resulted~~reflects a decrease of $6.0 million from successful collection efforts and net charge-offs of approximately $13.4 million and $27.3 million for the second quarter and first half of 2008, respectively. Consumer loans delinquencies have shown signs of improvement, particularly inDecember 31, 2007, principally related to the auto loan portfolio. This portfolio continues to show signs of stability and ~~the net charge offs~~benefited from changes in underwriting standards implemented in late 2005. The consumer loan portfolio with an average life of approximately four years has been replenished by new originations under revised standards.

			Refer to ~~average loans ratio on the consumer portfolio (including finance leases) improved during the quarter to 3.02% from 3.20%~~“Risk Management — Non-accruing and Non-performing Assets” section below for ~~the first quarter of 2008.~~additional information.

Although the balance of non-accruing residential mortgage loans increased by $21.2 million due to adverse economic conditions in Puerto Rico, as compared to the balance as of December 31, 2007, this portfolio has remained stable since the end of the first quarter of 2008 due to improved collection efforts and, to some extent, the impact of loans modified through the loan loss mitigation program that were returned to accruing status as borrowers have made consistent payments over a sustained period. Refer to “Risk Management — Non-accruing and Non-performing Assets” section below for additional information.

Critical Accounting Policies and Practices

The accounting principles of the Corporation and the methods of applying these principles conform with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States and to general practices within the banking industry. The Corporation’s critical accounting policies relate to the 1) allowance for loan and lease losses; 2) other-than-temporary impairments; 3) income taxes; 4) classification and related values of investment securities; 5) valuation of financial instruments; 6) derivative financial instruments; and 7) income recognition on loans. These critical accounting policies involve judgments, estimates and assumptions made by management that affect the recorded assets and liabilities and contingent assets and liabilities disclosed as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from estimates, if different assumptions or conditions prevail. Certain determinations inherently have greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions, and judgments and, as such, have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than those originally reported.

The Corporation’s critical accounting policies are described in the Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of First BanCorp’s 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K. There have not been any material changes in the Corporation’s critical accounting policies since December 31, 2007.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income is the excess of interest earned by First BanCorp on its interest-earning assets over the interest incurred on its interest-bearing liabilities. First BanCorp’s net interest income is subject to interest rate risk due to the re-pricing and maturity mismatch of the Corporation’s assets and liabilities. Net interest income for the quarter and ~~six-month~~nine-month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008 was ~~$134.6~~$144.6 million and ~~$259.1~~$403.7 million, respectively, compared to ~~$117.2~~$105.0 million and ~~$234.7~~$339.7 million, respectively, for the comparable periods in 2007. On an adjusted tax equivalent basis, excluding the changes in the fair value of derivative instruments and unrealized gains and losses on SFAS 159 liabilities, net interest income for the quarter and ~~six-month~~nine-month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008 was ~~$144.5~~$158.2 million and ~~$275.8~~$433.9 million, respectively, compared to ~~$119.5~~$114.9 million and ~~$241.3~~$356.2 million, respectively, for the same periods in 2007.

Part I of the following table presents average volumes and rates on an adjusted tax equivalent basis and Part II presents, also on an adjusted tax equivalent basis, the extent to which changes in interest rates and changes in volume of interest-related assets and liabilities have affected the Corporation’s net interest income. For each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided on changes attributable to (i) changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior period rates) and, (ii) changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior period volumes). Rate-volume variances (changes in rate multiplied by changes in volume) have been allocated to the changes in volume and rate based upon their respective percentage of the combined totals.

The net interest income is computed on an adjusted tax equivalent basis (for definition and reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure, refer to discussions below) and excluding: (1) the change in the fair value of derivative instruments and (2) unrealized gains or losses on SFAS 159 liabilities.

4347

Part I


	Average volume				Interest income (1) / expense				Average rate (1)						Average volume				Interest income (1) / expense				Average rate (1)
Quarter ended June 30,	2008		2007		2008		2007		2008			2007
															September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,			September 30,
Quarter ended															2008		2007		2008		2007		2008			2007
	(Dollars in thousands)														(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Money market investments	$	374,559	$	424,877	$	1,813	$	5,288		1.95	%		4.99	%	$	178,973	$	743,628	$	974	$	9,418		2.17	%		5.02	%
Government obligations⁽²⁾		1,303,468		2,634,794		20,566		39,139		6.35	%		5.96	%		1,031,654		2,781,044		18,218		40,694		7.03	%		5.81	%
Mortgage-backed securities		3,806,115		2,340,279		58,034		29,295		6.13	%		5.02	%		4,809,138		2,220,250		78,214		27,954		6.47	%		5.00	%
Corporate bonds		6,103		6,964		141		143		9.29	%		8.24	%		6,103		7,711		143		144		9.32	%		7.41	%
FHLB stock		66,703		44,099		1,140		748		6.87	%		6.80	%		69,427		43,919		968		802		5.55	%		7.24	%
Equity securities		4,183		8,515		—		2		0.00	%		0.09	%		3,692		7,033		18		—		1.94	%		—

Total investments⁽³⁾		5,561,131		5,459,528		81,694		74,615		5.91	%		5.48	%		6,098,987		5,803,585		98,535		79,012		6.43	%		5.40	%

Residential real estate loans		3,308,950		2,877,844		54,239		46,847		6.59	%		6.53	%		3,427,707		2,942,505		54,756		47,093		6.36	%		6.35	%
Construction loans		1,475,995		1,447,779		20,745		31,403		5.65	%		8.70	%		1,487,779		1,469,983		20,286		30,070		5.42	%		8.12	%
Commercial loans		5,379,906		4,740,338		73,461		90,738		5.49	%		7.68	%		5,477,213		4,767,201		74,164		90,528		5.39	%		7.53	%
Finance leases		376,007		381,609		8,108		8,342		8.67	%		8.77	%		372,404		384,302		7,842		8,350		8.38	%		8.62	%
Consumer loans		1,613,563		1,737,817		46,479		50,794		11.59	%		11.72	%		1,800,336		1,713,625		52,142		50,587		11.52	%		11.71	%

Total loans^{(4) (5)}		12,154,421		11,185,387		203,032		228,124		6.72	%		8.18	%		12,565,439		11,277,616		209,190		226,628		6.62	%		7.97	%

Total interest-earning assets	$	17,715,552	$	16,644,915	$	284,726	$	302,739		6.46	%		7.30	%	$	18,664,426	$	17,081,201	$	307,725	$	305,640		6.56	%		7.10	%


Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing deposits	$	11,045,132	$	10,503,431	$	98,295	$	127,804		3.58	%		4.88	%
Brokered CDs															$	7,643,238	$	8,268,728	$	73,962	$	107,065		3.85	%		5.14	%
Other interest-bearing deposits																3,677,632		3,160,418		26,005		35,121		2.81	%		4.41	%
Loans payable																42,391		—		240		—		2.25	%		—
Other borrowed funds		3,724,955		3,648,460		32,351		46,449		3.49	%		5.11	%		4,296,355		3,183,421		39,333		39,383		3.64	%		4.91	%
FHLB advances		1,151,861		675,530		9,572		9,001		3.34	%		5.34	%		1,212,121		671,026		10,018		9,172		3.29	%		5.42	%

Total interest-bearing liabilities⁽⁶⁾	$	15,921,948	$	14,827,421	$	140,218	$	183,254		3.54	%		4.96	%	$	16,871,737	$	15,283,593	$	149,558	$	190,741		3.53	%		4.95	%

Net interest income					$	144,508	$	119,485											$	158,167	$	114,899

Interest rate spread										2.92	%		2.34	%										3.03	%		2.15	%
Net interest margin										3.28	%		2.88	%										3.37	%		2.67	%

Part II


				Quarter ended June 30,										Six-month period ended June 30,							Quarter ended September 30,									Nine-month period ended September 30,
				2008 compared to 2007										2008 compared to 2007							2008 compared to 2007									2008 compared to 2007
				Increase (decrease)										Increase (decrease)							Increase (decrease)									Increase (decrease)
				Due to:										Due to:							Due to:									Due to:
	Volume			Rate				Total			Volume			Rate				Total			Volume			Rate			Total			Volume			Rate			Total
								(In thousands)													(In thousands)
Interest income on interest-earning assets:
Money market investments	$	(565	)		$	(2,910	)	$	(3,475	)	$	(334	)		$	(5,260	)	$	(5,594	)	$	(4,825	)	$	(3,619	)	$	(8,444	)	$	(5,934	)	$	(8,104	)	$	(14,038	)
Government obligations		(20,470	)			1,897			(18,573	)		(28,387	)			6,618			(21,769	)		(28,168	)		5,692			(22,476	)		(55,517	)		11,209			(44,308	)
Mortgage-backed securities		21,234				7,505			28,739			20,858				11,899			32,757			40,104			10,156			50,260			59,842			23,175			83,017
Corporate bonds		(20	)			18			(2	)		(36	)			30			(6	)		(34	)		33			(1	)		(91	)		147			56
FHLB stock		384				8			392			707				352			1,059			407			(241	)		166			1,112			113			1,225
Equity securities		(1	)			(1	)		(2	)		(10	)			18			8			(9	)		27			18			(20	)		46			26

Total investments		562				6,517			7,079			(7,202	)			13,657			6,455			7,475			12,048			19,523			(608	)		26,586			25,978

Residential real estate loans		6,941				451			7,392			13,506				85			13,591			7,623			40			7,663			21,168			86			21,254
Construction loans		493				(11,151	)		(10,658	)		435				(19,186	)		(18,751	)		234			(10,018	)		(9,784	)		678			(29,213	)		(28,535	)
Commercial loans		10,452				(27,729	)		(17,277	)		18,999				(40,801	)		(21,802	)		11,300			(27,664	)		(16,364	)		30,435			(68,601	)		(38,166	)
Finance leases		(136	)			(98	)		(234	)		76				(259	)		(183	)		(266	)		(242	)		(508	)		(170	)		(521	)		(691	)
Consumer loans		(3,704	)			(611	)		(4,315	)		(6,823	)			(1,122	)		(7,945	)		2,454			(899	)		1,555			(4,422	)		(1,968	)		(6,390	)

Total loans		14,046				(39,138	)		(25,092	)		26,193				(61,283	)		(35,090	)		21,345			(38,783	)		(17,438	)		47,689			(100,217	)		(52,528	)

Total interest income		14,608				(32,621	)		(18,013	)		18,991				(47,626	)		(28,635	)		28,820			(26,735	)		2,085			47,081			(73,631	)		(26,550	)


Interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing deposits		5,635				(35,144	)		(29,509	)		7,432				(49,473	)		(42,041	)
Brokered CDs																						(7,667	)		(25,436	)		(33,103	)		(10,724	)		(63,992	)		(74,716	)
Other interest-bearing deposits																						4,614			(13,730	)		(9,116	)		11,737			(21,281	)		(9,544	)
Loans payable																						240			—			240			240			—			240
Other borrowed funds		797				(14,895	)		(14,098	)		(1,109	)			(23,516	)		(24,625	)		11,859			(11,909	)		(50	)		11,550			(36,225	)		(24,675	)
FHLB advances		5,159				(4,588	)		571			10,580				(7,058	)		3,522			5,881			(5,035	)		846			16,481			(12,113	)		4,368

Total interest expense		11,591				(54,627	)		(43,036	)		16,903				(80,047	)		(63,144	)		14,927			(56,110	)		(41,183	)		29,284			(133,611	)		(104,327	)

Change in net interest income	$	3,017			$	22,006		$	25,023		$	2,088			$	32,421		$	34,509		$	13,893		$	29,375		$	43,268		$	17,797		$	59,980		$	77,777

The following table summarizes the components of the net unrealized gains and losses on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges) and net unrealized gains and losses on SFAS 159 liabilities which are included in interest expense.


	Quarter ended June 30,						Six month period ended June 30,						Quarter ended September 30,						Nine-month period ended September 30,
(In thousands)	2008			2007			2008			2007			2008			2007			2008			2007
Unrealized loss (gain) on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges):
Unrealized (gain) loss on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges):
Interest rate swaps and other derivatives on brokered CDs	$	29,934		$	81,685		$	(25,402	)	$	62,058		$	(5,669	)	$	(61,971	)	$	(31,071	)	$	87
Interest rate swaps and other derivatives on medium-term notes		314			1,522			1			1,357			(48	)		(358	)		(47	)		999

Net unrealized loss (gain) on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges)	$	30,248		$	83,207		$	(25,401	)	$	63,415
Net unrealized (gain) loss on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges)													$	(5,717	)	$	(62,329	)	$	(31,118	)	$	1,086


Unrealized (gain) loss on SFAS 159 liabilities:
Unrealized (gain) loss on brokered CDs		(28,462	)		(75,607	)		21,095			(56,398	)
Unrealized loss on brokered CDs														791			62,973			21,886			6,575
Unrealized gain on medium-term notes		(2	)		(252	)		(899	)		(130	)		(961	)		(483	)		(1,860	)		(613	)

Net unrealized (gain) loss on SFAS 159 liabilities	$	(28,464	)	$	(75,859	)	$	20,196		$	(56,528	)	$	(170	)	$	62,490		$	20,026		$	5,962


Net unrealized loss (gain) on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges) and SFAS 159 liabilities	$	1,784		$	7,348		$	(5,205	)	$	6,887
Net unrealized (gain) loss on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges) and SFAS 159 liabilities													$	(5,887	)	$	161		$	(11,092	)	$	7,048

Derivative instruments, such as interest rate swaps, are subject to market risk. While the Corporation does have certain trading derivatives to facilitate customer transactions, the Corporation does not utilize derivative instruments for speculative purposes. The Corporation’s derivatives are mainly composed of interest rate swaps that are used to convert the fixed interest payments on its brokered CDs and medium-term notes to variable payments (receive fixed/pay floating). Refer to Note 8 “Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” of the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for further details concerning the notional amounts of derivative instruments and additional information. As is the case with investment securities, the market value of derivative instruments is largely a function of the financial market’s expectations regarding the future direction of interest rates. Accordingly, current market values are not necessarily indicative of the future impact of the values of derivative instruments on net interest income. This will depend, for the most part, on the shape of the yield curve as well as the level of interest rates.

Net interest income increased ~~15%~~38% to ~~$134.6~~$144.6 million for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008 from ~~$117.2~~$105.0 million in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2007 and by ~~10%~~19% to ~~$259.1~~$403.7 million for the first ~~six~~nine months of 2008 from ~~$234.7~~$339.7 million infor the ~~first half of 2007.~~same period a year ago. First BanCorp’s net interest spread and margin, on an adjusted tax equivalent basis, for the quarter and ~~six-month~~nine-month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008 were ~~2.92%~~3.03% and ~~3.28%~~3.37% and ~~2.78%~~2.87% and ~~3.19%~~3.25%, respectively, compared to ~~2.34%~~2.15% and ~~2.88%~~2.67% and ~~2.35%~~2.28% and ~~2.91%~~2.83%, respectively, for the same periods in 2007. The increase in net interest income, spread and margin reflects the effect of both changes in interest rates and changes in the mix and volume of the Corporation’s balance sheet. Net interest income benefited from lower short-term interest rates and the Corporation’s liability sensitive balance sheet position. The average rate paid by the Corporation on its interest-bearing liabilities decreased by 142 and ~~107~~120 basis points during the ~~second~~third quarter and first ~~half~~nine months of 2008 when compared to same periods in 2007, mainly due to ~~the decrease in~~lower short-term rates and ~~its~~their effect inon the mix of borrowings.

The Corporation has been extending the duration of its borrowings to reduce exposure to high levels of market volatility. Since the first half of 2008 the Corporation has been replacing swapped-to-floating brokered certificates of deposit (“CDs”) that matured or were called (due to lower short-term rates) with brokered CDs that were not hedged with interest rate swaps; in this way, the Corporation locked-in current lower interest rates for longer periods. The decrease in short-term interest rates resulted in the call by counterparties of approximately ~~$1.4~~$2.6 billion of interest rate swaps used by the Corporation to convert fixed-rate brokered CDs to a floating rate, during the ~~second quarter~~first nine months of 2008 ($~~2.4 billion~~167.2 million for the ~~first half~~third quarter of 2008). Following the cancellation of these swaps, the Corporation exercised its call option on approximately ~~$1.3~~$2.5 billion swapped-to-floating brokered CDs ($~~2.4 billion~~129.2 million for the ~~first half~~third quarter of 2008). ~~The current interest rate scenario has allowed~~

Also, the Corporation has extended the maturity of other funding sources by, among other things, entering into long-term repurchase agreements at lower rates compared to ~~replace brokered CDs that matured or were called with brokered CDs that are not hedged with~~rate levels a year ago. The comparisons against the previous year results reflect improvements in net interest spreads and margins. However, the extension of the maturity of interest bearing liabilities and increasing costs due to the current credit crisis in the U.S. financial markets could increase the Corporation’s current overall cost of funding in the foreseeable future. This possible increase in the cost of funds is expected to be offset by higher and more rational loan pricing in the markets where the Corporation operates.

A lower overall average cost of funds is also related to the repricing of borrowings as reflected to some extent by net interest settlement income on interest rate swaps of approximately $10.3 million and ~~has~~$30.2 million for the third quarter and first nine months of 2008, respectively, compared to net interest settlement expenses of $3.4 million and $10.8 million, respectively, for the comparable periods in 2007. Meanwhile, interest income was adversely affected by lower ~~rates than~~yields in the ~~brokered CDs that were hedged~~loan portfolio attributable to the re-pricing of variable rate commercial and construction loans tied to short-term indexes and the increase in the balance of non-performing loans.

The increase in net interest income was also associated with ~~interest rate swaps~~a higher volume of interest-earning assets, driven by an increase of $1.3 billion in average loans over the third quarter of 2007 and of $991.3 million over the first nine-months of 2007. This increase was driven by the growth in internal originations, in particular commercial and residential real estate loans, and to a lesser extent ~~with other lower cost borrowings such as FHLB advances. This has reduced~~purchases of loans, including the ~~overall~~acquisition of a $218 million auto loan portfolio during the third quarter of 2008 which contributed to a wider interest rate spread. The weighted-average coupon of this portfolio is approximately 10.89%, a significant spread over the average cost of funding. ~~By reducing~~

For the ~~exposure to swapped-to-floating interest rate swaps that hedged brokered CDs,~~investments side, the ~~Corporation locked-in interest rates for longer periods, thus reducing interest rate risk.~~

~~The~~ drop in rates in the long end of the yield curve, as compared to previous year rates, adversely affected interest income in the first nine months of 2008 due to the early redemption through call exercises ~~in the second quarter of 2008~~ of approximately ~~$1.1~~$1.2 billion of U.S. Agency debentures with an average yield of 5.87% ($~~1.2 billion for the first half of 2008~~18.4 million with an average yield of ~~5.88%)~~5.40% for the third quarter of 2008). In spite of this, and given market opportunities, the Corporation bought U.S. government sponsored ~~agency~~agencies MBS amounting to ~~$2.2 billion at an average yield of 5.50% during the second quarter of 2008 ($3.2~~$3.2 billion at an average yield of 5.44% ~~for~~during the first half of ~~2008)~~2008, which is significantly higher than the cost of borrowings used to finance the purchase of such assets. ~~The increase~~Also, the lack of liquidity in the ~~volume~~financial markets has caused several call dates go by in 2008 without counterparties actions to exercise call provisions embedded in approximately $949 million of the investment portfolio also contributed to a higher net interest income during the first half of 2008 as reflected in the increase on the weighted-average yield of investment securities of 43 and 39 basis points during the second quarter and first half of 2008, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2007. Average earning assets increasedU.S. agency debentures still held by ~~approximately $1.1 billion for the second quarter of 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007 and by $687.9 million for the first half of 2008,as compared to the same period a year ago.~~

Also, a lower overall average cost of funds is related to the repricing of borrowings as reflected to some extent by net interest settlement income of approximately $12.9 million and $19.9 million for the second quarter and first half of 2008, respectively, compared to net interest settlement expenses of $3.5 million and $7.3 million,

respectively, for the comparable periods in 2007. Meanwhile, net interest income was adversely affected by lower yields in the loan portfolio attributed to the re-pricing of variable rate commercial and construction loans tied to short-term indexes, the increase in the balance of non-performing loans, and market disruptions in the U.S. mainland which have increased the spread between the interest rates on Brokered CDs and LIBOR/swap rates and have kept the Corporation as of September 30, 2008. The Corporation has benefited from ~~capturing the full benefit of the decrease in interest rates in the wholesale funding source.~~higher than current market yields on these instruments.

As shown on the tables above, the results of operations for the ~~second~~third quarter and first ~~half~~nine months of 2008 and 2007 were impacted by changes in the valuation of derivative instruments that economically hedge the Corporation’s brokered CDs and medium-term notes and unrealized gains and losses on SFAS 159 liabilities. The change in the valuation of derivative instruments, net unrealized gains and losses on SFAS 159 liabilities and the basis adjustment (for 2007 results) recorded as part of net interest income resulted in a net gain of ~~$3.9~~$4.3 million and ~~$6.1~~$10.4 million for the ~~second~~third quarter and first ~~half~~nine months of 2008, respectively, compared to a net ~~gain~~loss of ~~$1.2~~$6.6 million and ~~$0.8~~$5.8 million, respectively, for the comparable periods in 2007. The results for 2008 include a net gain of ~~$4.0~~$0.5 million for the ~~second~~third quarter and of ~~$4.4~~$4.8 million for the first ~~half,~~nine months, resulting from the reversal of the cumulative mark-to-market valuation of swaps and brokered CDs called. During the first half of 2008, approximately $2.4 billion of interest rate swaps were cancelled by the counterparties, mainly due to lower 3-month LIBOR and the Corporation, following the swaps cancellation, exercised its call option on approximately $2.4 billion swapped to floating brokered CDs.

On an adjusted tax equivalent basis, net interest income, excluding the changes in the fair value of derivative instruments and unrealized gains and losses on SFAS 159 liabilities, increased by ~~$25.0~~$43.3 million, or ~~21%~~38%, and ~~$34.5~~$77.8 million, or ~~14%~~22%, for the ~~second~~third quarter and first ~~half~~nine months of 2008, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2007. The increase in the adjusted tax equivalent net interest income was principally due to an increase in tax-equivalent adjustments and the ~~above mentioned discussions about~~ declining interest rates and changes in the mix and volume of the Corporation’s balance ~~sheet.~~sheet discussed above. The adjusted tax equivalent basis includes an adjustment that increases interest income on tax-exempt securities and loans by an amount which makes tax-exempt income comparable, on a pre-tax basis, to the Corporation’s taxable income. For the ~~second~~third quarter and first ~~half~~nine months of 2008, tax-equivalent adjustments amounted to ~~$13.8~~$17.9 million and ~~$22.8~~$40.7 million, respectively, compared to ~~$3.4~~$3.3 million and ~~$7.4~~$10.7 million, respectively, for the comparable periods in 2007. The increase in tax-equivalent adjustments was mainly related to increases in the interest rate spread on tax-exempt assets due to ~~the declines in~~lower short-term interest rates.

Provision and Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

Refer to the discussions under “Credit Risk Management” below for an analysis of the allowance for loan and lease losses and non-performing assets and related ratios.

~~First BanCorp’s provision for loan and lease losses for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2008 increased by $16.7 million, or 68%, and by $37.6 million, or 76%, respectively,~~The increase, as compared to ~~the same period in 2007. The increase in the provision for the 2008~~2007 periods, ~~was primarily due~~is mainly attributable to ~~additional reserves allocated to certain~~a higher volume of impaired construction and commercial ~~and construction~~ loans, ~~as well as~~ increases to the reserve factors for potential losses inherent in the ~~loans~~loan portfolio, ~~associated with the weakening economic conditions in Puerto Rico~~ and the slowdown in the United States housing sector. Increases to reserve factors due to economic conditions in Puerto Rico include higher provisions for the residential mortgage loan portfolio. Puerto Rico’s economy continued in a recession caused by, among other things, higher utilities prices, higher taxes, government budgetary imbalances and higher oil prices. The increase in non-accruing loans coupled with the growth of the Corporation’s ~~commercial and residential mortgage loans portfolio also contributed to the increase in the provision for~~total loan ~~and lease losses.~~portfolio.

The Corporation ~~identified~~has seen stress in the ~~first half~~credit quality of, ~~2008 several commercial~~ and worsening affecting its construction loan portfolio, in particular condo-conversion loans ~~amounting~~in the U.S. mainland (mainly in the state of Florida) affected by continuing deterioration in the health of the economy, an oversupply of new homes and declining housing prices in the United States. The total exposure of the Corporation to ~~$239.6~~loans originally disbursed as condo-conversion loans in the United States is approximately $251 million ~~that it determined should be classified as~~or 2% of the total loan portfolio. A total of approximately $182.2 million of this condo conversion portfolio is considered impaired ~~of which $188.6 million had~~under SFAS 114 with a specific reserve of ~~$27.4 million. Refer~~$31.4 million allocated to ~~the discussion under “Credit Risk Management” below for additional information regarding the composition of~~these impaired loans. Specific reserves of $8.1 million were recorded for impaired loans in the United States for the quarter and first nine months of 2007.

The increase in the provision for loan losses for 2008 ~~periods,~~was significantly driven by three large impaired loan relationships, two in the United States and one in Puerto Rico, which required significant specific reserves. With respect to the United States mainland market, the Corporation recorded approximately $16.7 million in additional reserves for impaired loans during the third quarter of 2008 ($36.3 million for the first nine months of 2008), including approximately $10.0 million in the third quarter of 2008 ($22.1 million for the first nine months of 2008) for two condo-conversion loans in Miami, Florida with an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $81.7 million. With respect to the Puerto Rico market, specific reserves of approximately $17.9 million were allocated to commercial and construction loans that were identified as ~~compared~~impaired loans during the third quarter of 2008 ($24.6 million for those identified during the first nine months of 2008), including a $4.8 million reserve allocated to ~~2007,~~a loan extended for land development and construction of a mid-rise residential housing project with an outstanding principal of $15.2 million. The construction of a second phase of this mid-rise residential project has been delayed in light of lower than expected demand due to diminished consumer purchasing power and general economic conditions. This loan is in non-accrual status as of September 30, 2008. The construction loan portfolio is affected by the deterioration in the economy because the underlying loans’ repayment capacity is dependent on the ability to attract home-purchasers and maintain housing prices.

To a lesser extent, the Corporation also ~~reflects higher~~increased its reserve factors for the ~~Miami Agency~~residential mortgage and construction loan portfolio ~~since~~from 2007 level to account for the ~~second half~~increased credit risk tied to recessionary conditions in Puerto Rico’s economy. Puerto Rico’s economy has been in a recession for about three years caused by, among other things, increases in utility costs, gasoline prices and highway toll charges, the implementation of ~~2007.~~

~~The Corporation maintains a constant monitoring~~sales taxes and periodic impasses between the executive and the legislative branches of the ~~Miami Agency portfolio. Recent loan reviews showed that the Miami Agency construction loan portfolio has an added susceptibility to current general market~~Commonwealth. The above conditions, ~~and real estate trends~~together with a recession looming also in the U.S. mainland and rising food prices, will continue to adversely affect the economy in Puerto Rico. The Puerto Rico housing market has not seen the dramatic decline in housing prices that is affecting the U.S. mainland, but there is a lower demand due to the ~~overbuilding~~diminished consumer purchasing power. Recent decreases in ~~certain areas~~oil prices should provide a relief to consumers and ~~downward price pressures. Based on these factors and a detailed review of~~should immediately impact the ~~portfolio, the Corporation determined it was prudent to further increase general provisions allocated to this portfolio.~~consumers’ purchasing power positively.

Non-Interest Income


	Quarter Ended						Six-Month Period Ended						Quarter Ended						Nine-Month Period Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						September 30,			September 30,			September 30,
	2008			2007			2008			2007			2008			2007			2008			2007
	(In thousands)												(In thousands)
Other service charges on loans	$	1,418		$	2,418		$	2,731		$	4,209		$	1,612		$	1,290		$	4,343		$	5,499
Service charges on deposit accounts		3,191			3,185			6,555			6,376			3,170			3,160			9,725			9,536
Mortgage banking activities		804			351			1,123			1,113			1,231			1,125			2,354			2,238
Rental income		579			669			1,122			1,333			583			620			1,705			1,953
Insurance income		2,551			2,625			5,279			5,574			2,631			2,681			7,910			8,255
Other operating income		4,138			3,091			9,058			6,399			5,208			3,088			14,266			9,487


Non-interest income before net (loss) gain on investments, net gain on partial extinguishment and recharacterization of a secured commercial loan to a local financial institution and gain on sale of credit card portfolio		12,681			12,339			25,868			25,004
Non-interest income before net (loss) gain on investments, insurance reimbursement and other agreements related to a contingency settlement, net gain on partial extinguishment and recharacterization of a secured commercial loan to a local financial institution and gain on sale of credit card portfolio														14,435			11,964			40,303			36,968


Gain on VISA shares		—			—			9,342			—
Gain on VISA shares and other proceeds														132			—			9,474			—
Net (loss) gain on sale of investments		(190	)		—			6,661			(732	)		—			(750	)		6,661			(1,482	)
Impairment on investments		(489	)		(1,436	)		(489	)		(2,863	)		(696	)		(2,369	)		(1,185	)		(5,232	)

Net (loss) gain on investments		(679	)		(1,436	)		15,514			(3,595	)		(564	)		(3,119	)		14,950			(6,714	)
Insurance reimbursement and other agreements related to a contingency settlement														—			15,075			—			15,075
Gain on partial extinguishment and recharacterization of a secured commercial loan to a local financial institution		—			—			—			2,497			—			—			—			2,497
Gain on sale of credit card portfolio		—			—			—			2,819			—			—			—			2,819


Total	$	12,002		$	10,903		$	41,382		$	26,725		$	13,871		$	23,920		$	55,253		$	50,645

The net gain (loss) on investment securities reflects gains or losses as a result of sales that are consistent with the Corporation’s investment policies as well as other-than-temporary impairment charges on the Corporation’s investment portfolio.

Non-interest income ~~increased 10%~~decreased 42% to ~~$12.0~~$13.9 million for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008 from ~~$10.9~~$23.9 million for the same period a year ago. ~~This is~~The financial results for the third quarter of 2007 included an income recognition of $15.1 million in connection with an agreement reached with insurance carriers and former executives for indemnity of expenses related to the class action lawsuit brought against the Corporation that was settled in 2007. Excluding this transaction, non-interest income increased by $5.0 million as compared to the third quarter of 2007 due to a combination of factors, including lower other-than-temporary impairment charges on equity securities, an increase in ~~POS~~point of sale (POS) and ATM interchange fee income, and ~~a recovery~~an increase in ~~value of servicing rights.~~fee income from cash management services provided to corporate customers.

For the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008, other-than-temporary impairment charges on ~~investment~~equity securities amounted to ~~$0.5~~$0.7 million, compared to a ~~$1.4~~$2.4 million charge recorded for the same period a year ago. Most of the Corporation’s investment portfolio is comprised of fixed-rate MBS issued or guaranteed by FNMA, FHLMC or GNMA and U.S. agency senior debt obligations. Thus, payment of a substantial portion is secured by mortgages and guaranteed by a U.S. government sponsored entity or backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. In connection with the placement of FNMA and FHLMC into conservatorship by the U.S. Treasury in September 2008, the Treasury entered into agreements to invest up to approximately $100 billion in each agency to, among other things, protects debt and mortgage-backed securities of the agencies. The fluctuation in non-interest income, as compared to the same period in 2007, also reflects the absence of sales of investment securities during the third quarter of 2008 compared to a loss of $0.8 million recorded for the same period of 2007 on the sale of certain low-yielding U.S. Treasury securities and U.S. sponsored agency MBS as part of the repositioning strategy of the investment portfolio.

POS and ATM interchange fee income increased by approximately $0.7 million, as compared to the third quarter of 2007, based on a change in the calculation of interchange fees charged between financial institutions in Puerto Rico from ~~the~~a fixed fee calculation to a percentage of the sale amount since the ~~second half~~latter part of 2007. ~~Recent increases in long-term rates and lower prepayment rates caused a recovery of $0.7~~Fee income from cash management services provided to corporate customers increased by $0.3 million ~~in the value of servicing rights~~ for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008, as compared to ~~$0.1 million for~~ the ~~comparable~~same period a year ~~ago. The above mentioned factors were partially offset~~ago, positively affected by a decrease of $1.0 million in fees and service charges on loans primarily related to certain non-recurrent transactions recorded during the second quarter of last year including income of $0.5 million related to syndication fees on a commercial loan and fees of approximately $0.6 million in connection with a credit card portfolio interim servicing agreement. This interim servicing agreement was related to a credit card portfolio sold by the Corporation early in 2007.lower short-term interest rates.

First BanCorp’s non-interest income for the first ~~half~~nine months of 2008 amounted to ~~$41.4~~$55.3 million, compared to ~~$26.7~~$50.6 million for the same period in 2007. Aside from the items mentioned above, the increase in non-interest income was mainly attributable to a one-time gain of $9.3 million on the sale of part of the Corporation’s investment in VISA, Inc. in connection with VISA’s initial public offering, ~~coupled~~together with a realized gain of $6.9 million on the sale of approximately $242 million of 5.5% FNMA fixed-rate MBS during the first quarter of 2008. Also, on a comparative basis to the first ~~half~~nine months of 2007, non-interest income was favorably affected by the lower other-than-temporary impairment charges on investment securities ~~which~~that decreased to ~~$0.5~~$1.2 million for the first ~~half~~nine months of 2008 compared to an impairment charge of ~~$2.9~~$5.2 million recorded in the first ~~half~~nine months of 2007. POS and ATM interchange fee income increased by approximately $1.8 million for the first nine months of 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007, and fee income from cash management services increased by $0.75

Professional fees decreased by ~~$0.7~~$1.7 million and ~~$2.0~~$3.8 million during the ~~second~~third quarter and first ~~half~~nine months of 2008, respectively, as compared to the same periods a year ago. The decrease was primarily attributable to lower legal, accounting and consulting fees due to, among other things, the conclusion of the process to file all required reports under the federal securities laws and the settlement of legal and regulatory matters.

For the first ~~half~~nine months of 2008, other expenses decreased by ~~$2.2~~$1.8 million, compared to the first ~~half~~nine months of 2007. The decrease reflects the impact of approximately $3.3 million in costs associated with capital raising efforts recorded in the first half of 2007. This was partially offset by a higher provision for sundry losses and an increase in the amortization of core deposit intangibles, mainly due to the acquisition of VICB in the first quarter of 2008.

Notwithstanding the above mentioned increases in non-interest expenses, the Corporation’s efficiency ratio for the ~~second~~third quarter and first ~~half~~nine months of 2008 was ~~55.77%~~51.97% and ~~54.57%~~53.67%, respectively, compared to ~~57.33%~~58.13% and ~~58.47%~~58.35% for the same periods a year ago, as the Corporation has been able to continue the expansion of its operations without incurring substantial additional operating expenses.

Provision for Income Tax

For the quarter ~~and six-month~~ended September 30, 2008, the Corporation recorded an income tax benefit of $3.7 million, compared to an income tax expense of $5.6 million recorded for the same period ~~ended June 30,~~in 2007. The fluctuation is mainly

related to a lower current income tax provision due to higher tax-exempt income.

For the first nine months of 2008, the Corporation recognized an income tax benefit of ~~$9.5~~$21.0 million ~~and $17.2 million, respectively,~~ compared to an income tax expense of ~~$6.2~~$18.0 million ~~and $12.4 million, respectively,~~ for the same ~~periods~~period in 2007. The positive fluctuation on the financial results was mainly due to two ~~non-recurrent~~non-ordinary transactions: (i) a reversal of $10.6 million of ~~UTBs~~Unrecognized Tax Benefits (“UTBs”) during the second quarter of 2008 for positions taken on income tax returns recorded under the provisions of FIN 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” as explained below, and (ii) the recognition of an income tax benefit of $5.4 million in connection with an agreement entered into with the Puerto Rico Department of Treasury during the first quarter of 2008 that establishes a multi-year allocation schedule for deductibility of the payment of $74.25 million made by the Corporation during 2007 to settle the securities class action suit. Also, ~~higher deferred tax benefits were recorded in connection with a higher provision for loan and lease losses, and~~ the current income tax provision was lower, excluding the reversal of the FIN 48 contingency, due to ~~lower taxable~~higher tax-exempt income. A significant portion of the increase in revenues was associated with exempt operations conducted through the international banking entity, FirstBank Overseas Corporation.

During the second quarter of 2008, the Corporation reversed UTBs by approximately $7.1 million and accrued interest of $3.5 million as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute of limitations for the 2003 taxable ~~year 2003. The Corporation does not anticipate any significant changes to its UTBs within the next 12 months.~~year. The amount of UTBs may increase or decrease in the future for various reasons, including changes in the amounts for current tax year positions, the expiration of open income tax returns due to the ~~applicable~~ statute of limitations, changes in management’s judgment about the level of uncertainty, the status of examinations, litigation and legislative activity and the addition or elimination of uncertain tax positions. For the outstanding UTBs, the Corporation cannot make any reasonably reliable estimate of the timing of future cash flows or changes, if any, associated with such obligations.

For additional information relating to income taxes, see Note 1516 in the accompanying notes to the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.

5559

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND OPERATING DATA ANALYSIS

Loan Production

First BanCorp relies primarily on its retail network of branches to originate residential and consumer loans. The Corporation supplements its residential mortgage loan originations with wholesale servicing released mortgage loan purchases from ~~small~~ mortgage bankers. The Corporation manages its construction and commercial loan originations through a centralized unit and most of its originations come from existing customers as well as through referrals and direct solicitations. For commercial loan originations, the Corporation also has regional offices to provide services to designated territories.

Total loan production, including purchases, for the quarter and ~~six-month~~nine-month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008 was ~~$1.0~~$1.2 billion and ~~$2.1~~$3.2 billion, respectively, compared to ~~$932.8~~$860.3 million and ~~$1.9~~$2.8 billion, respectively, for the comparable periods in 2007. The increase in loan production was mainly due to increases in commercial and residential real estate mortgage loan ~~originations. The increase in commercial~~originations and ~~residential mortgage~~to the purchase of a $218 million auto loan ~~originations was partially offset by a lower loan production~~portfolio during the third quarter of ~~consumer loans and finance leases, which was negatively impacted by worsening economic conditions in Puerto Rico.~~2008.

The following table details the First BanCorp’s loan production for the periods indicated:


	Quarter ended June 30,				Six-month period ended June 30,				Quarter ended September 30,				Nine-month period ended
(In thousands)	2008		2007		2008		2007		2008		2007		2008		2007
Residential real estate	$	205,542	$	151,362	$	391,360	$	319,701	$	168,808	$	155,331	$	560,168	$	475,032
Commercial and construction		652,884		575,954		1,337,874		1,161,881		603,542		514,733		1,941,416		1,676,614
Finance leases		28,784		35,973		58,086		83,145		29,131		28,651		87,217		111,796
Consumer(1)		140,064		169,473		277,637		342,788		374,556		161,605		652,193		504,393

Total loan production	$	1,027,274	$	932,762	$	2,064,957	$	1,907,515	$	1,176,037	$	860,320	$	3,240,994	$	2,767,835

From the financial institution’s perspective: (1) the credit may be used against income taxes, including estimated taxes, for years commencing after December 31, 2007 in three installments, subject to certain limitations, between January 1, 2008 and June 30, 2011; (2) the credit may be ceded, sold or otherwise transferred to any other person; and (3) any tax credit not used in a given tax year, as certified by the Secretary of Treasury, may be claimed as a refund.

Loan originations of the Corporation covered by Act 197 amounted to approximately ~~$31.3~~$18.2 million and ~~$62.7~~$80.9 million for the ~~second~~third quarter and first ~~half~~nine months of 2008, respectively. ~~Residential~~The increase in residential mortgage ~~loan originations increase~~loans was also related to higher purchases through the Corporation’s Partners in Business program as explained below, which amounted to ~~$57.7 million and $116.9~~$164.5 million for the ~~second quarter and~~ first ~~half~~nine months of 2008, ~~respectively,~~ compared to ~~$49.7~~$147.8 million ~~and $99.5 million, respectively,~~ for the comparable ~~periods~~period in 2007.

Residential real estate loans represent ~~19%~~17% of total loans originated and purchased for the first ~~half~~nine months of 2008. The Corporation’s strategy is to penetrate markets by providing customers with a variety of high quality mortgage products. The Corporation’s residential mortgage loan originations continued to be driven by FirstMortgage, its mortgage loan origination subsidiary. The Corporation continues to commit substantial resources to this operation with the goal of becoming a leading institution in the highly competitive residential mortgage loans market. FirstMortgage supplements its internal direct originations through its retail network with an indirect business strategy. The Corporation’s Partners in Business, a division of FirstMortgage, partners with mortgage brokers and small mortgage bankers in Puerto Rico to purchase ongoing mortgage loan production. FirstMortgage Realty Group focuses on building relationships with realtors by providing resources, office amenities and personnel to assist real estate brokers in building their individual businesses and closing transactions. FirstMortgage’s multi-channel strategy has proven to be effective in capturing business.

Commercial and Construction Loans

Commercial and construction loan production for the ~~second~~third quarter and first ~~half~~nine months of 2008 increased by ~~$76.9~~$88.8 million, or ~~13%~~17%, and by ~~$176.0~~$264.8 million, or ~~15%~~16%, compared to the same periods in 2007. The increase in commercial and construction loan production was experienced mainly in ~~both geographic segments,~~ Puerto ~~Rico and Miami.~~Rico. Commercial ~~loans~~loan originations in Puerto Rico increased by approximately ~~$226.5~~$382.3 million for the first ~~half~~nine months of 2008, as compared to the same period in ~~2007,~~2007. Commercial originations include floor plan lending activities which depends on inventory levels (autos) financed and intheir turnover. Floor plan originations amounted to approximately $545.1 million for the ~~Miami Agency increased by $61.1~~first nine months of 2008, compared to $528.3 million ~~driven by~~for the same period a ~~commercial loan secured by real estate amounting to $52.5 million to finance the acquisition of a commercial office complex.~~year ago. This was partially offset by lower construction loan originations in the ~~Miami Agency,~~United States, which decreased by ~~$74.2~~$91.4 million for the first ~~half~~nine months of 2008, as compared to the first ~~half~~nine months of 2007 due to the slowdown in the U.S. housing market and the strategic decision by the Corporation to reduce its exposure to condo-conversion loans ~~in the~~on its Miami ~~Agency.~~Corporate Banking operations. Also, there was a decrease in construction loan originations in Puerto Rico due to current weakening economic conditions.

Commercial loan originations come from existing customers as well as through referrals and direct solicitations. The Corporation follows a strategy aimed to cater to customer needs in the commercial loans middle-market segment by building strong relationships and offering financial solutions that meet customers’ unique needs. The Corporation has expanded its distribution network and participation in the commercial loans middle-market segment by focusing on customers with financing needs in amounts up to $5 million. The Corporation ~~established~~has 5 regional offices that provide coverage throughout Puerto Rico. The offices are staffed with

~~$65.2~~ $147.8 million, ~~or 19%, respectively,~~ compared to the same periods in 2007. The ~~decrease~~increase was related to the purchase of a $218 million auto loan portfolio from Chrysler Financial Services Caribbean, LLC (“Chrysler”) in July 2008. Aside from this transaction, the consumer loan ~~originations was~~production decreased for the third quarter and first nine months of 2008 by $5.3 million, or 3%, and by $70.5 million, or 14%, compared to the same periods in 2007, mainly due to adverse economic conditions in Puerto Rico.

Finance Leases

For the ~~second~~third quarter ~~and~~of 2008, finance lease originations remained flat as compared to the same period a year ago. For the first ~~half~~nine months of 2008, finance lease originations, which are mostly composed of loans to individuals to finance the acquisition of a motor vehicle, decreased by ~~$7.2~~$24.6 million, or ~~20%, and by $25.1 million, or 30%~~22%, as compared to the same ~~periods~~period in 2007, also affected by adverse economic ~~condition~~conditions in Puerto Rico.

Assets

Total assets as of ~~June~~September 30, 2008 amounted to ~~$18.8~~$19.3 billion, asan increase of $2.1 billion compared to ~~$17.2 billion~~total assets as of December 31, ~~2007, an~~2007. The Corporation’s loan portfolio increased by $913.4 million (before the allowance for loan and lease losses) driven by new originations and the purchase of the $218 million auto loan portfolio during the third quarter of 2008. Also, the increase ~~of $1.6 billion. This~~in total assets is ~~mainly~~ attributable to the ~~increase in the Corporation’s portfolio of MBS resulting from the aforementioned~~ purchase of approximately $3.2 billion of U.S. government agency fixed-rate MBS during the first half of 2008 as market conditions presented an opportunity for the Corporation to obtain attractive yields, improve its net interest margin and ~~mitigate~~replace the ~~impact of~~ $1.2 billion of U.S. Agency debentures called by counterparties. ~~Also,~~The Corporation increased its cash and money market investments by $66.2 million in part as a precautionary measure given the ~~increase in total assets, as compared to the balance as of December 31, 2007, was related to the increase~~current crisis in the ~~loan portfolio of $450.3 million (before allowance for loan and lease losses) driven by new originations.~~financial markets.

Loan Portfolio

The composition of the Corporation’s loan portfolio, including loans held for sale, for the periods indicated is as follows:


	June 30,		December 31,		September 30,		December 31,
(In thousands)	2008		2007		2008		2007
Residential real estate loans	$	3,393,934	$	3,164,421	$	3,470,802	$	3,164,421


Commercial loans:
Construction loans		1,467,544		1,454,644		1,478,076		1,454,644
Commercial real estate loans		1,324,509		1,279,251		1,422,899		1,279,251
Commercial loans		3,502,929		3,231,126		3,602,123		3,231,126
Loans to local financial institutions collateralized by real estate mortgages		591,674		624,597		579,305		624,597

Commercial loans		6,886,656		6,589,618		7,082,403		6,589,618


Finance leases		373,588		378,556		371,982		378,556


Consumer and other loans		1,595,867		1,667,151		1,787,915		1,667,151

Total loans	$	12,250,045	$	11,799,746	$	12,713,102	$	11,799,746

The Corporation’s construction lending volume has decreased due to the slowdown in the U.S. housing market and the current economic environment in Puerto Rico. The Corporation has reduced its exposure to condo-conversion loans in ~~the~~its Miami ~~Agency~~Corporate Banking operations and is closely evaluating market conditions and opportunities in Puerto Rico. Current absorption rates in condo-conversion loans in the United States are low and properties collateralizing some of these condo conversion loans have been formally reverted to rental properties with a future plan for the sale of converted units upon an improvement in the United States real estate market. As of September 30, 2008, approximately $43.3 million of loans originally disbursed as condo-conversion construction loans have been reverted to income-producing loans. Given more conservative underwriting standards of the banks in general and a reduction of market participants in the lending business, the Corporation believes that the rental market will grow and rental properties will hold their values.

The composition of the Corporation’s construction loan portfolio as of ~~June~~September 30, 2008 by category and geographic location follows:


	Puerto			Virgin			United						Puerto			Virgin			United
As of June 30, 2008	Rico			Islands			States			Total
As of September 30, 2008													Rico			Islands			States			Total
	(In thousands)												(In thousands)
Loans for residential housing projects:
High-Rise (1)	$	158,961		$	—		$	559		$	159,520
Mid-Rise (2)		114,630			3,687			43,412			161,729
Single-Family detach		93,182			2,341			49,406			144,929
High-rise (1)													$	168,647		$	—		$	559		$	169,206
Mid-rise (2)														108,510			4,842			46,564			159,916
Single-family detach														105,291			2,376			45,687			153,354

Total for residential housing projects		366,773			6,028			93,377			466,178			382,448			7,218			92,810			482,476

Construction loans to individual secured by residential properties		16,043			38,760			—			54,803
Construction loans to individuals secured by residential properties														14,680			40,032			—			54,712
Condo-conversion loans(3)		—			—			250,375			250,375			—			—			207,835			207,835
Loans for commercial projects		152,788			75,786			33,794			262,368			184,328			81,044			23,624			288,996
Bridge and Land loans		162,469			38,677			205,837			406,983			170,753			37,794			209,392			417,939
Working Capital		30,603			1			—			30,604
Working capital														31,004			—			—			31,004

Total before net deferred fees and allowance for loan losses		728,676			159,252			583,383			1,471,311			783,213			166,088			533,661			1,482,962
Net deferred fees		(2,898	)		(602	)		(267	)		(3,767	)		(4,185	)		(461	)		(240	)		(4,886	)

Total construction loan portfolio, gross	$	725,778		$	158,650		$	583,116		$	1,467,544			779,028			165,627			533,421			1,478,076
Allowance for loan losses														(22,122	)		(1,292	)		(48,553	)		(71,967	)

Total construction loan portfolio, net													$	756,906		$	164,335		$	484,868		$	1,406,109

Finance Leases

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2008, finance leases, which are mostly composed of loans to individuals to finance the acquisition of a motor vehicle, decreased by ~~$5.0~~$6.6 million as compared to the portfolio balance as of December 31, 2007. These leases typically have five-year terms and are collateralized by a security interest in the underlying assets.

Investment Activities

As part of its strategy to diversify its revenue sources and maximize its net interest income, First BanCorp maintains an investment portfolio that is classified as available-for-sale or held-to-maturity. The Corporation’s investment portfolio, other than short-term money market investments, as of ~~June~~September 30, 2008 amounted to ~~$5.9~~$5.8 billion, an increase of ~~$1.3~~$1.2 billion when compared with the investment portfolio as of December 31, 2007. The increase in investment securities was mainly due to the previously discussed purchase of approximately $3.2 billion of U.S. government sponsored agency fixed-rate MBS during the first half of 2008 as market conditions presented an opportunity for the Corporation to obtain attractive yields, improve its net interest margin and mitigate the impact of $1.2 billion U.S. Agency debentures called by counterparties. The Corporation also sold approximately $242 million of MBS in the first quarter of 2008 as a spike and subsequent contraction in the yield spread during the first quarter provided an opportunity to sell the MBS at a gain.

Over 91% of the Corporation’s carrying amount in the securities portfolio is invested in U.S. Government and Agency debentures and fixed-rate U.S. government sponsored-agency mortgage-backed securities (mainly FNMA and FHLMC fixed-rate securities). As of September 30, 2008 the Corporation had $4.3 billion and $0.9 billion in FNMA and FHLMC mortgage-backed securities and debt securities, respectively, representing 85% of the total investment portfolio. The Corporation’s investment in equity securities is minimal and none of its equity securities is related to U.S. financial institutions that recently failed.

Net interest income of future periods may be affected by the acceleration in prepayments of mortgage-backed securities. Acceleration in the prepayments of mortgage-backed securities would lower yields on securities purchased at a premium, as the amortization of premiums paid upon acquisition of these securities would accelerate. Conversely, acceleration in the prepayments of mortgage-backed securities would increase yields on securities purchased at a discount, as the amortization of the discount would accelerate. Also, net interest income in future periods might be affected by the Corporation’s investment in callable securities. Approximately $1.2 billion of U.S. Agency debentures with an average yield of ~~5.88%~~5.87% were called during the first ~~half~~nine months of ~~2008, however,~~2008. However, given market opportunities, the Corporation bought U.S. government sponsored ~~agency~~agencies MBS amounting to $3.2 billion at an average yield of 5.44% during the first half of 2008, which is significantly higher than the cost of borrowings used to finance the purchase of such assets. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2008, there are still approximately ~~$967 million~~$0.9 billion in U.S. agency debentures with embedded calls. Lower reinvestment rates and a time lag between calls, prepayments and/or the maturity of investments and actual reinvestment of proceeds into new investments might affect net interest income in the future. These risks are directly linked to future period market interest rate fluctuations. Refer to the “Risk Management” discussion below for further analysis of the effects of changing interest rates on the Corporation’s net interest income and for the interest rate risk management strategies followed by the Corporation. Also refer to Note 4 to the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding the Corporation’s investment portfolio.

~~Sources of Funds~~RISK MANAGEMENT

The Corporation has in place a risk management framework to monitor, evaluate and manage the principal risks assumed in conducting its activities. First BanCorp’s business is subject to eight broad categories of risks: (1) liquidity risk, (2) interest rate risk, (3) market risk, (4) credit risk, (5) operational risk, (6) legal and compliance risk, (7) reputation risk, and (8) contingency risk. First BanCorp has adopted policies and procedures designed to identify and manage risks to which the Corporation is exposed, specifically those relating to liquidity risk, interest rate risk, credit risk, and operational risk.

The Corporation’s ~~principal~~risk management policies are described below as well as in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of First BanCorp’s 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Liquidity and Capital Adequacy

Liquidity is the ongoing ability to accommodate liability maturities and deposit withdrawals, fund asset growth and business operations, and meet contractual obligations through unconstrained access to funding at reasonable market rates. Liquidity management involves forecasting funding requirements and maintaining sufficient capacity to meet the needs and accommodate fluctuations in asset and liability levels due to changes in our business operations or unanticipated events.

The Corporation manages liquidity at two levels. The first is the liquidity of the parent company, which is the holding company that owns the banking and nonbanking subsidiaries. The second is the liquidity of the banking subsidiaries. The Asset and Liability Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for establishing the Corporation’s liquidity policy as well as approving operating and contingency procedures, and monitoring liquidity on an ongoing basis. The Management’s Investment and Asset Liability Committee of the Corporation (“MIALCO”), using measures of liquidity developed by management, which involve the use of several assumptions, reviews the Corporation’s liquidity position on a monthly basis. The MIALCO oversees liquidity management, interest rate risk and other related matters. The MIALCO, which reports to the Board of Directors’ Asset and Liability Committee, is composed of senior management officers, including the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, the Chief Operating Officer, the Chief Risk Officer, the Wholesale Banking Executive, the Risk Manager of the Treasury and Investments Division, the Financial Risk Manager and the Treasurer. The Treasury and Investments Division is responsible for planning and executing the Corporation’s funding activities and strategy; monitors liquidity availability on a daily basis and reviews liquidity measures on a weekly basis. The Treasury and Investments Accounting and Operations area of the Comptroller’s Department is responsible for calculating the liquidity measurements used by the Treasury and Investment Division to review the Corporation’s liquidity position.

In order to ensure adequate liquidity through the full range of potential operating environments and market conditions, the Corporation conducts its liquidity management and business activities in a manner that will preserve and enhance funding stability, flexibility and diversity. Key components of this operating strategy include a strong focus on customer-based funding, maintaining direct relationships with wholesale market funding providers, and maintaining the ability to liquidate certain assets when, and if, requirements warrant.

The Corporation develops and maintains contingency funding plans for both the parent company and bank liquidity positions. These plans evaluate the Corporation’s liquidity position under various operating circumstances and allow the Corporation to ensure that it will be able to operate through periods of stress when access to normal sources of funding is constrained. The plans project funding requirements during a potential period of stress, specify and quantify sources of liquidity, outline actions and procedures for effectively managing through a difficult period, and define roles and responsibilities. In the Contingency Funding Plan, the Corporation stresses the balance sheet and the liquidity position to critical levels that imply difficulties in getting new funds or even maintaining its current funding position, thereby ensuring the ability to honor its commitments, and establishing liquidity triggers monitored by the MIALCO in order to maintain the ordinary funding of banking business. Three different scenarios are defined in the Contingency Funding Plan: local market event, credit rating downgrade, and a concentration event. They are reviewed and approved annually by the Board of Directors’ Asset and Liability Committee.

The Corporation maintains a basic surplus (cash, short-term assets minus short-term liabilities, and secured lines of credit) in excess of a 5% self-imposed minimum limit amount over total assets. As of September 30, 2008, the basic surplus ratio of approximately 10.9% included un-pledged assets, FHLB lines of credit, collateral pledged at the FED Discount Window Program, and cash. Un-pledged assets as of September 30,

2008 are mainly composed of U.S. Agency fixed rate debentures, money market investments and mortgage-backed securities totaling $1.2 billion, which can be sold under agreements to repurchase. The Corporation does not rely on uncommitted inter-bank lines of credit (federal funds lines) to fund its operations; and does not include them in the basic surplus computation. The financial market disruptions that began in 2007, and became exacerbated in 2008, continued to impact the financial services sector and may affect access to regular and customary sources of funding, including repurchase agreements, as counterparties may not be willing to enter into additional agreements in order to protect their liquidity. However, the Corporation has taken direct actions to enhance its liquidity positions and to safeguard the access to credit. Such initiatives include, among other things, the posting of additional collateral and thereby increasing its borrowing capacity with the FHLB and the FED through the Discount Window Program, the issuance of additional brokered CDs to increase its liquidity levels and the extension of its borrowing maturities to reduce exposure to high levels of market volatility. The Corporation understands that current conditions of liquidity and credit limitations could continue to be observed well into 2009. Thus, the Corporation will continue to monitor the different alternatives available under programs announced by the FED and the FDIC such as the Term Auction Facility (TAF) for short-term loans, expansions to qualifying collateral that the government will loan against, including commercial paper, guarantees of new issuances of senior unsecured debts and the issuance of preferred stock under the Troubled-Asset Relief Program (TARP).

Sources of Funding

The Corporation utilizes different sources of funding to help ensure that adequate levels of liquidity are available when needed. Diversification of funding sources is of great importance to protect the Corporation’s liquidity from market disruptions. The principal sources of short-term funds are ~~retail brokered CDs, branch-based~~ deposits, ~~institutional deposits, federal funds purchased,~~ securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and lines of credit with the FHLB, the FED Discount Window Program, and other unsecured lines established with financial institutions. The Credit Committee of the Board of Directors reviews credit availability on a regular basis. In the past, the Corporation has securitized and sold mortgage loans as a supplementary source of funding. Commercial paper has also provided additional funding as well as long-term funding through the issuance of notes ~~payable~~ and ~~FHLB advances.~~long-term brokered CDs. The cost of these different alternatives, among other things, is taken into consideration.

AsRecent initiatives by the FED to ease the credit crisis have included, among other things, cuts to the discount rate, the availability of ~~June 30, 2008, total liabilities amounted~~the TAF to ~~$17.4 billion, an increase~~provide short-term loans to banks and expanding the qualifying collateral it will lend against, to include commercial paper. Meanwhile the FDIC announced a program to strengthen confidence and encourage liquidity in the banking system by guaranteeing newly issued senior unsecured debt of ~~approximately $1.6 billion, as compared~~banks, thrifts, and certain holding companies, and by providing full coverage of non-interest bearing deposit transaction accounts, regardless of dollar amount. The FDIC also raise the cap on deposit insurance coverage from $100,000 to ~~$15.8 billion as of~~$250,000 until December 31, ~~2007.~~ 2009. Additional actions include the announcement of a federal government program to purchase stock in private U.S. financial firms, including banks. These actions made the federal government a viable source of funding in the current environment.

The ~~increase in total liabilities was mainly attributed~~Corporation’s principal sources of funding are:

Brokered CDs- A large portion of the Corporation’s funding is retail brokered CDs issued by the Bank subsidiary, FirstBank Puerto Rico. Total brokered CDs increased from $7.2 billion at year end 2007 to a higher volume of securities sold under repurchase agreements aligned with the increase in MBS. In addition, total liabilities increased due to a higher volume of deposits, an increase of $493.3 million compared to the balance as of December 31, 2007.$8.4 billion at September 30, 2008. The Corporation has been issuing brokered CDs to finance its lending activities, pay off repurchase agreements issued to finance the purchase of MBS in the first half of 2008, accumulate additional liquidity due to current market volatility, and extend the maturity of its borrowings.

In the event that the Corporation’s Bank subsidiary falls below the ratios of a well-capitalized institution, it faces the risk of not being able to ~~attract clients by offering competitive rates~~replace funding through this source. The Bank currently complies and ~~additional interest-bearing products. In terms~~exceeds the minimum requirements of ~~core deposit accounts,~~ratios for a “well-capitalized” institution and does not foresee falling below required levels to issue brokered deposits. The average term to maturity of the ~~Corporation has added more than 44,000 new accounts since~~retail brokered CDs

The following table presents a maturity summary of CDs with denominations of $100,000 or higher ~~including brokered CDs,~~ as of ~~June~~September 30, 2008. As


(In thousands)	Total
Three months or less	$	1,762,077
Over three months to six months		1,222,191
Over six months to one year		1,912,439
Over one year		4,503,666

Total	$	9,400,373

Certificates of ~~June 30, 2008, brokered CDs over $100,000 amounted to $7.1 billion.~~

(In thousands) Total
Three months or less $ 2,121,983
Over three months to six months 964,747
Over six months to one year 1,865,767
Over one year 3,206,341

Total $ 8,158,838

~~Despite most of the brokered CDs included in the table above are issued and settled in large block trades~~deposits with ~~brokers through the Depository Trust Corporation (DTC), these brokered CDs are sold by third-party intermediaries in denominations~~principal amounts of $100,000 or ~~less within FDIC insurance limit.~~

The Corporation maintains unsecured lines of credit with other banks. As of June 30, 2008, the Corporation’s total unused lines of credit with these banks amounted to $290.0 million. As of June 30, 2008, the Corporation had an available line of credit with the FHLB, guaranteed by mortgage loans pledged to the FHLBmore include brokered deposits issued in the ~~amount~~form of ~~$203.3 million. Also, there are available approximately $97.0 million through~~large ($100,000 or more) certificates of deposit that have been participated out by the ~~Federal Reserve discount window program.~~broker in shares of less that $100,000.

Retail deposits- The Corporation’s deposit products also include regular savings accounts, demand deposit accounts, money market accounts ~~CDs,~~ and ~~brokered~~retail CDs. Refer to “Note 10 — Deposits” in the accompanying notes to the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements for further details. Total deposits, ~~amounted~~excluding brokered CDs, increased from $3.9 billion at December 31, 2007 to ~~$11.5~~$4.5 billion ~~as of June~~at September 30, 2008 ~~compared to $11.0 billion~~mainly driven by an increase in money market accounts and non-time deposits as a result of ~~December 31, 2007.~~direct campaigns and cross-selling strategies.

Refer to the “Net Interest Income” discussion above for information about average balances of interest-bearing deposits, and the average interest rate paid on deposits for the quarters and ~~six-month~~nine-month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008 and 2007.

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase- The growth of the Corporation’s investment portfolio is substantially funded with repurchase agreements. Securities sold under repurchase agreements were $3.3 billion at September 30, 2008, compared with $2.9 billion at December 31, 2007. One of the Corporation’s strategies is the use of structured repurchase agreements and long-term repurchase agreements to reduce exposure to interest rate risk by lengthening the final maturities of its liabilities while keeping funding cost at reasonable levels. Of the total of $3.3 billion repurchase agreements outstanding as of September 30, 2008, approximately $2.2 billion consist of structured repos and $600 million of long-term repos. The access to this type of funding has been affected by the current liquidity problems in the financial markets as certain counterparties are not willing to enter into additional repurchase agreements and the capacity to extend the term of maturing repurchase agreements has been reduced. Refer to Note 12 in the accompanying notes to the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements for further details about repurchase agreements outstanding by counterparty and maturities.

6470

Under the Corporation’s repurchase agreements, as is the case with derivative contracts, the Corporation is required to deposit cash or qualifying securities to meet margin requirements. To the extent that the value of securities previously pledged as collateral declines because of changes in interest rates, a liquidity crisis or any other factor, the Corporation will be required to deposit additional cash or securities to meet its margin requirements, thereby adversely affecting its liquidity. Given the quality of the collateral pledged, the Corporation has not experienced significant margin calls from counterparties recently arising from write-downs in valuations.

Advances from the FHLB —The Corporation’s Bank subsidiary is a member of the FHLB system and obtains advances to fund its operations under a collateral agreement with the FHLB that requires the Bank to maintain minimum qualifying mortgages as collateral for advances taken. As of September 30, 2008, the outstanding balance of FHLB advances was $986.0 million, compared to $1.1 billion as of December 31, 2007. Approximately $442.0 million of outstanding advances from the FHLB matured over one year. As part of its precautionary initiatives to safeguard access to credit, the Corporation increased its capacity under FHLB credit facilities by posting additional collateral and, as of September 30, 2008, it had $803 million available for additional borrowings.

FED Discount window —As of September 30, 2008, the Corporation had $300 million outstanding in short-term borrowings from the FED Discount Window. FED initiatives to ease the credit crisis have included cuts to the discount rate, which was lowered from 5.75% to 1.75% through nine separate actions since September 2007, and adjustments to previous practices to facilitate financing for longer periods. This make the FED Discount Window a viable source of funding given current market conditions. The Corporation had pledged U.S. government agency fixed-rate MBS on this short-term borrowing channel and recently has increased its capacity by posting additional collateral with the FED. As of September 30, 2008, the Corporation had $180 million available for use through the FED Discount Window Program.

Credit Lines— The Corporation maintains unsecured and un-committed lines of credit with other banks. As of September 30, 2008, the Corporation’s total unused lines of credit with other banks amounted to $220 million. The Corporation has not used these lines of credit.

Though currently not in use, other sources of short-term funding for the Corporation include commercial paper and federal funds purchased. Furthermore, the Corporation has entered in previous years into several financing transactions to diversify its funding sources, including the issuance of notes payable and Junior subordinated debentures as part of its longer-term liquidity and capital management activities. The Corporation continues to evaluate its financing options, including available options resulting from recent federal government initiatives to deal with the crisis in the financial markets.

The Corporation’s principal uses of funds are the origination of loans and the repayment of maturing brokered CDs and borrowings. Over the last four years, the Corporation has committed substantial resources to its mortgage banking subsidiary, FirstMortgage Inc., with the goal of becoming a leading institution in the highly competitive residential mortgage loans market. As a result, residential real estate loans as a percentage of total loans receivable have increased over time from 14% at December 31, 2004 to 27% at September 30, 2008. Commensurate with the increase in its mortgage banking activities, the Corporation has also invested in technology and personnel to enhance the Corporation’s secondary mortgage market capabilities. The enhanced capabilities improve the Corporation’s liquidity profile as it allows the Corporation to derive liquidity, if needed, from the sale of mortgage loans in the secondary market. Recent disruptions in the credit markets and a reduced investors’ demand for mortgage debt have adversely affected the liquidity of the secondary mortgage markets. The U.S. (including Puerto Rico) secondary mortgage market is still highly liquid in large part because of the sale or guarantee programs of the FHA, VA, HUD, FNMA and FHLMC. In connection with the placement of FNMA and FHLMC into conservatorship by the U.S. Treasury in September 2008, the Treasury entered into agreements to invest up to approximately $100 billion in each agency.

Credit Ratings

FirstBank’s long-term senior debt rating is currently rated Ba1 by Moody’s Investor Service (“Moodys”) and BB+ by Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”), one notch under their definition of investment grade. Fitch Ratings Ltd. (“Fitch”) has rated the Corporation’s long-term senior debt a rating of BB, which is two notches under investment grade. However, the credit ratings outlook for Moody’s and S&P are stable while Fitch’s is still negative. The Corporation does not have any outstanding debt or derivative agreements that would be affected by a credit downgrade. The Corporation’s liquidity is contingent upon its ability to obtain external sources of funding to finance its operations. Any future downgrades in credit ratings can hinder the Corporation’s access to external funding and/or cause external funding to be more expensive, which could in turn adversely affect the results of operations. Also, any change in credit ratings may affect the fair value of certain liabilities and unsecured derivatives which considered the Corporation’s own credit risk as part of the valuation.

Cash Flows

Cash and cash equivalents was $445.2 million and $611.5 million at September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. These balances increased by $66.2 million and $42.7 million from December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The following discussion highlights the major activities and transactions that affected the Corporation’s cash flows during the first nine months of 2008 and 2007.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

First BanCorp’s operating assets and liabilities vary significantly in the normal course of business due to the amount and timing of cash flows. Management believes cash flows from operations, available cash balances and the Corporation’s ability to generate cash through short- and long-term borrowings will be sufficient to fund the Corporation’s operating liquidity needs.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, net cash provided by operating activities was $142.8 million. Net cash generated from operating activities was higher than net income largely as a result of adjustments for operating items such as the provision for loan and lease losses and depreciation and amortization.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, net cash provided by operating activities was $36.6 million, which was lower than net income as a result of: (i) the monetary payment of $74.25 million during the third quarter of 2007 for the settlement of the class action brought against the Corporation relating to the accounting for mortgage-related transactions that led to the restatement of financial statements for years 2000 through 2004, and (ii) non-cash adjustments, including the accretion and discount amortizations associated to the Corporations’ investment portfolio.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

The Corporation’s investing activities primarily include originating loans to be held to maturity and its available-for-sale and held-to-maturity investment portfolios. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, net cash of $2.2 billion was used in investing activities, primarily for purchases of available-for-sale investment securities as market conditions presented an opportunity for the Corporation to obtain attractive yields, improve its net interest margin and mitigate the impact of investments securities, mainly U.S. Agency debentures, called by counterparties prior to maturity, for loan originations disbursements and for the purchase of a $218 million auto loan portfolio. Partially offsetting these uses of cash were proceeds from sales and maturities of available-for-sale securities as well as proceeds from held-to-maturity securities called during 2008; proceeds from sales of loans and the non-recurrent gain on the mandatory redemption of part of the Corporation’s investment in VISA, Inc., which completed its initial public offering (IPO) in March 2008.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, net cash provided by investing activities was $210.2 million, primarily from collections on loans, sales and maturities of investment securities and residential mortgage loans. Partially offsetting these cash proceeds were cash used for loan origination disbursements and purchases of held to maturity securities.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

The Corporation’s financing activities primarily include the receipt of deposits and issuance of brokered CDs, the issuance and payments of long-term debt, the issuance of equity instruments and activities related to its short-term funding. In addition, the Corporation pays monthly dividends on its preferred stock and quarterly dividends on its common stock. In the first nine months of 2008, net cash provided by financing activities was $2.1 billion due to increases in its deposit base, including brokered CDs to finance lending activities; the use of the FED Discount Window Program to further increase liquidity levels; and increases in securities sold under repurchase agreements to finance the Corporation’s securities inventory. Partially offsetting these cash proceeds was the payment of cash dividends.

In the first nine months of 2007, net cash used in financing activities was $204.1 million due to a net decrease in securities sold under repurchase agreements aligned with the Corporation’s decrease in investments securities that resulted from maturities and prepayments received and the Corporation’s decision back in 2007 to de-leverage its investment portfolio in order to protect earnings from margin erosions under a flat-to-inverted yield curve scenario; the early redemption of a $150 million medium-term note during the second quarter of 2007 and the payment of cash dividends. Partially offsetting these uses of cash were proceeds from the issuance of brokered CDs and additional advances from FHLB used in part to pay down repurchase agreements and notes payable and proceeds from the issuance of 9.250 million common shares in a private placement.

Capital

The Corporation’s stockholders’ equity amounted to $1.4 billion as of ~~June~~September 30, 2008, ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$20.0~~$19.6 million compared to the balance as of December 31, ~~2007. The decrease in stockholders’ equity as~~2007 driven by the net income of ~~June 30, 2008 is mainly attributable~~$91.1 million recorded for the first nine months of 2008. Partially offsetting the increase due to current period earnings was a net unrealized ~~losses~~loss of ~~$53.5~~$21.9 million on the fair value of available for sale securities recorded as part of comprehensive income in connection ~~to recent decreases~~with fluctuations in MBS prices. Also, dividends declared during the first ~~half~~nine months of 2008 amounted to ~~$33.1 million. These factors were partially offset by~~$49.6 million ($19.4 million in common stock and $30.2 million in preferred stock). In terms of dividend payments, the ~~net income of $66.6 million recorded for~~Corporation is confident, based on its internal forecast that it will be able to continue paying the ~~first half of 2008.~~current dividend amounts to common, preferred and trust preferred shareholders.

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2008, First BanCorp, FirstBank Puerto Rico and FirstBank Florida were in compliance with regulatory capital requirements that were applicable to them as a financial holding company, a state non-member bank and a thrift, respectively (i.e., total capital and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 8% and 4%, respectively, and Tier 1 capital to average assets of at least 4%). Set forth below are First BanCorp’s, FirstBank Puerto Rico’s and FirstBank Florida’s regulatory capital ratios as of ~~June~~September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, based on existing Federal Reserve, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Office of Thrift Supervision guidelines.

~~For each~~The Corporation is well capitalized and positioned to manage economic downturns. The total regulatory capital ratio is 13.1% and the Tier 1 capital ratio is 11.8%. This translates to $413 million and $783 million of total capital and Tier 1 capital, respectively, in excess of the ~~six-month periods ended on June 30, 2008~~total capital and ~~2007,~~Tier 1 capital well capitalized requirements of 10% and 6%, respectively. The Corporation is evaluating the issuance of preferred stock through the U.S. Treasury’s recently announced Troubled-Asset Relief Program (TARP). The maximum amount of capital that the Corporation ~~declared cash dividends~~can issue is 3% of ~~$0.14 per common share. Total cash dividends paid on common shares amounted to $13.0 million for~~its risk-weighted assets. A capital raise of this nature would increase the first half of 2008 and $11.7 million for the same period in 2007, an increase attributable to the 9.250 million additional shares issued during the third quarter of 2007. Dividends declared on preferred stock amountedtotal regulatory capital ratio to approximately ~~$20.2~~16%, or $800 million ~~for each~~in excess of well capitalized requirement, and the Tier 1 capital ratio to approximately 14.7%, or approximately $1.2 billion in excess of the ~~six-month periods ended on June 30, 2008 and 2007.~~well capitalized requirement. For purposes of projected capital ratios shown above, a risk-weight factor of 20% was assigned to proceeds from the issuance of stock.

The Corporation’s risk management policies are described below as well as in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of First BanCorp’s 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Liquidity and Capital Adequacy

In order to ensure adequate liquidity through the ~~ordinary course~~full range of ~~business,~~potential operating environments and market conditions, the Corporation ~~engages~~conducts its liquidity management and business activities in ~~financial transactions~~a manner that ~~are not recorded~~will preserve and enhance funding stability, flexibility and diversity. Key components of this operating strategy include a strong focus on customer-based funding, maintaining direct relationships with wholesale market funding providers, and maintaining the ability to liquidate certain assets when, and if, requirements warrant.

2008 are mainly composed of U.S. Agency fixed rate debentures, money market investments and mortgage-backed securities totaling $1.2 billion, which can be sold under agreements to repurchase. The Corporation does not rely on uncommitted inter-bank lines of credit (federal funds lines) to fund its operations; and does not include them in the basic surplus computation. The financial market disruptions that began in 2007, and became exacerbated in 2008, continued to impact the financial services sector and may affect access to regular and customary sources of funding, including repurchase agreements, as counterparties may not be ~~recorded on~~willing to enter into additional agreements in order to protect their liquidity. However, the ~~balance sheet in amounts~~Corporation has taken direct actions to enhance its liquidity positions and to safeguard the access to credit. Such initiatives include, among other things, the posting of additional collateral and thereby increasing its borrowing capacity with the FHLB and the FED through the Discount Window Program, the issuance of additional brokered CDs to increase its liquidity levels and the extension of its borrowing maturities to reduce exposure to high levels of market volatility. The Corporation understands that current conditions of liquidity and credit limitations could continue to be observed well into 2009. Thus, the Corporation will continue to monitor the different alternatives available under programs announced by the FED and the FDIC such as the Term Auction Facility (TAF) for short-term loans, expansions to qualifying collateral that the government will loan against, including commercial paper, guarantees of new issuances of senior unsecured debts and the issuance of preferred stock under the Troubled-Asset Relief Program (TARP).

Sources of Funding

The Corporation utilizes different sources of funding to help ensure that adequate levels of liquidity are ~~different than~~available when needed. Diversification of funding sources is of great importance to protect the ~~full contract or notional amount~~Corporation’s liquidity from market disruptions. The principal sources of short-term funds are deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and lines of credit with the FHLB, the FED Discount Window Program, and other unsecured lines established with financial institutions. The Credit Committee of the ~~transaction.~~Board of Directors reviews credit availability on a regular basis. In the past, the Corporation has securitized and sold mortgage loans as a supplementary source of funding. Commercial paper has also provided additional funding as well as long-term funding through the issuance of notes and long-term brokered CDs. The cost of these different alternatives, among other things, is taken into consideration.

Recent initiatives by the FED to ease the credit crisis have included, among other things, cuts to the discount rate, the availability of the TAF to provide short-term loans to banks and expanding the qualifying collateral it will lend against, to include commercial paper. Meanwhile the FDIC announced a program to strengthen confidence and encourage liquidity in the banking system by guaranteeing newly issued senior unsecured debt of banks, thrifts, and certain holding companies, and by providing full coverage of non-interest bearing deposit transaction accounts, regardless of dollar amount. The FDIC also raise the cap on deposit insurance coverage from $100,000 to $250,000 until December 31, 2009. Additional actions include the announcement of a federal government program to purchase stock in private U.S. financial firms, including banks. These ~~transactions are designed to (1) meet~~actions made the ~~financial needs~~federal government a viable source of ~~customers, (2) manage~~funding in the current environment.

The Corporation’s ~~credit, market or liquidity risks, (3) diversify~~principal sources of funding are:

Brokered CDs- A large portion of the Corporation’s funding ~~sources~~is retail brokered CDs issued by the Bank subsidiary, FirstBank Puerto Rico. Total brokered CDs increased from $7.2 billion at year end 2007 to $8.4 billion at September 30, 2008. The Corporation has been issuing brokered CDs to finance its lending activities, pay off repurchase agreements issued to finance the purchase of MBS in the first half of 2008, accumulate additional liquidity due to current market volatility, and ~~(4) optimize capital.~~extend the maturity of its borrowings.

In the event that the Corporation’s Bank subsidiary falls below the ratios of a well-capitalized institution, it faces the risk of not being able to replace funding through this source. The Bank currently complies and exceeds the minimum requirements of ratios for a “well-capitalized” institution and does not foresee falling below required levels to issue brokered deposits. The average term to maturity of the retail brokered CDs

outstanding as of September 30, 2008 is approximately 3 years. Approximately 28% of the principal value of these certificates is callable at the Corporation’s option.

~~As a provider~~The use of ~~financial services,~~brokered CDs has been particularly important for the growth of the Corporation. The Corporation encounters intense competition in attracting and retaining regular retail deposits in Puerto Rico. The brokered CDs market is very competitive and liquid, and the Corporation ~~routinely enters into commitments with off-balance sheet risk~~has been able to ~~meet~~obtain substantial amounts of funding in short periods of time. This strategy enhances the ~~financial needs of its customers. These financial instruments may include loan commitments~~Corporation’s liquidity position, since the brokered CDs are insured by the FDIC up to regulatory limits and ~~standby letters of credit. These commitments are subject~~can be obtained faster compared to ~~the same credit policies and approval process used~~regular retail deposits. Demand for ~~on-balance sheet instruments. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess~~brokered CDs has recently increased as a result of the ~~amount recognized~~move by investors from riskier investments, such as equities, to federally guaranteed instruments such as brokered CDs and the recent increase in ~~the statements of financial position. As of June 30, 2008, commitments~~FDIC deposit insurance from $100,000 to extend credit and commercial and financial standby letters of credit amounted to approximately $1.7 billion and $100.3 million, respectively. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to customers as long as the conditions established in the contract are met. Generally, the Corporation’s mortgage banking activities do not enter into interest rate lock agreements with its prospective borrowers.

~~Contractual Obligations and Commitments~~$250,000.

The following table presents a ~~detail~~maturity summary of CDs with denominations of $100,000 or higher as of September 30, 2008.


(In thousands)	Total
Three months or less	$	1,762,077
Over three months to six months		1,222,191
Over six months to one year		1,912,439
Over one year		4,503,666

Total	$	9,400,373

Certificates of deposits with principal amounts of $100,000 or more include brokered deposits issued in the ~~maturities~~form of large ($100,000 or more) certificates of deposit that have been participated out by the broker in shares of less that $100,000.

Retail deposits- The Corporation’s deposit products also include regular savings accounts, demand deposit accounts, money market accounts and retail CDs. Refer to “Note 10 — Deposits” in the accompanying notes to the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements for further details. Total deposits, excluding brokered CDs, increased from $3.9 billion at December 31, 2007 to $4.5 billion at September 30, 2008 mainly driven by an increase in money market accounts and non-time deposits as a result of direct campaigns and cross-selling strategies.

Refer to the “Net Interest Income” discussion above for information about average balances of interest-bearing deposits, and the average interest rate paid on deposits for the quarters and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase- The growth of the Corporation’s ~~contractual obligations~~investment portfolio is substantially funded with repurchase agreements. Securities sold under repurchase agreements were $3.3 billion at September 30, 2008, compared with $2.9 billion at December 31, 2007. One of the Corporation’s strategies is the use of structured repurchase agreements and ~~commitments, which~~long-term repurchase agreements to reduce exposure to interest rate risk by lengthening the final maturities of its liabilities while keeping funding cost at reasonable levels. Of the total of $3.3 billion repurchase agreements outstanding as of September 30, 2008, approximately $2.2 billion consist of structured repos and $600 million of long-term repos. The access to this type of funding has been affected by the current liquidity problems in the financial markets as certain counterparties are not willing to enter into additional repurchase agreements and the capacity to extend the term of maturing repurchase agreements has been reduced. Refer to Note 12 in the accompanying notes to the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements for further details about repurchase agreements outstanding by counterparty and maturities.

The Corporation’s principal uses of funds are the origination of loans and the repayment of maturing brokered CDs ~~long-term contractual debt obligations, commitments~~and borrowings. Over the last four years, the Corporation has committed substantial resources to ~~sell~~its mortgage banking subsidiary, FirstMortgage Inc., with the goal of becoming a leading institution in the highly competitive residential mortgage loans market. As a result, residential real estate loans as a percentage of total loans receivable have increased over time from 14% at December 31, 2004 to 27% at September 30, 2008. Commensurate with the increase in its mortgage banking activities, the Corporation has also invested in technology and ~~commitments~~personnel to ~~extend credit:~~enhance the Corporation’s secondary mortgage market capabilities. The enhanced capabilities improve the Corporation’s liquidity profile as it allows the Corporation to derive liquidity, if needed, from the sale of mortgage loans in the secondary market. Recent disruptions in the credit markets and a reduced investors’ demand for mortgage debt have adversely affected the liquidity of the secondary mortgage markets. The U.S. (including Puerto Rico) secondary mortgage market is still highly liquid in large part because of the sale or guarantee programs of the FHA, VA, HUD, FNMA and FHLMC. In connection with the placement of FNMA and FHLMC into conservatorship by the U.S. Treasury in September 2008, the Treasury entered into agreements to invest up to approximately $100 billion in each agency.

Credit Ratings

Contractual Obligations and Commitments
As of June 30, 2008
Total Less than 1 year 1-3 years 3-5 years After 5 years
(In thousands)
Contractual obligations (1):
Certificates of deposit (2) $ 8,968,964 $ 5,597,645 $ 1,580,372 $ 129,694 $ 1,661,253
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase 3,999,590 1,912,090 787,500 500,000 800,000
Advances from FHLB 1,460,000 1,024,000 215,000 221,000 —
Notes payable 27,944 — 7,564 6,973 13,407
Other borrowings 231,865 — — — 231,865

Total contractual obligations $ 14,688,363 $ 8,533,735 $ 2,590,436 $ 857,667 $ 2,706,525

Commitments to sell mortgage loans $ 71,307 $ 71,307

Standby letters of credit $ 100,298 $ 100,298

Commitments to extend credit:
Lines of credit $ 1,222,199 $ 1,222,199
Letters of credit 30,671 30,671
Commitments to originate loans 404,724 404,724

Total commercial commitments $ 1,657,594 $ 1,657,594

FirstBank’s long-term senior debt rating is currently rated Ba1 by Moody’s Investor Service (“Moodys”) and BB+ by Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”), one notch under their definition of investment grade. Fitch Ratings Ltd. (“Fitch”) has rated the Corporation’s long-term senior debt a rating of BB, which is two notches under investment grade. However, the credit ratings outlook for Moody’s and S&P are stable while Fitch’s is still negative. The Corporation does not have any outstanding debt or derivative agreements that would be affected by a credit downgrade. The Corporation’s liquidity is contingent upon its ability to obtain external sources of funding to finance its operations. Any future downgrades in credit ratings can hinder the Corporation’s access to external funding and/or cause external funding to be more expensive, which could in turn adversely affect the results of operations. Also, any change in credit ratings may affect the fair value of certain liabilities and unsecured derivatives which considered the Corporation’s own credit risk as part of the valuation.

Cash Flows

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Capital

The Corporation’s stockholders’ equity amounted to $1.4 billion as of September 30, 2008, an increase of $19.6 million compared to the balance as of December 31, 2007 driven by the net income of $91.1 million recorded for the first nine months of 2008. Partially offsetting the increase due to current period earnings was a net unrealized loss of $21.9 million on the fair value of available for sale securities recorded as part of comprehensive income in connection with fluctuations in MBS prices. Also, dividends declared during the first nine months of 2008 amounted to $49.6 million ($19.4 million in common stock and $30.2 million in preferred stock). In terms of dividend payments, the Corporation is confident, based on its internal forecast that it will be able to continue paying the current dividend amounts to common, preferred and trust preferred shareholders.

As of September 30, 2008, First BanCorp, FirstBank Puerto Rico and FirstBank Florida were in compliance with regulatory capital requirements that were applicable to them as a financial holding company, a state non-member bank and a thrift, respectively (i.e., total capital and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 8% and 4%, respectively, and Tier 1 capital to average assets of at least 4%). Set forth below are First BanCorp’s, FirstBank Puerto Rico’s and FirstBank Florida’s regulatory capital ratios as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, based on existing Federal Reserve, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Office of Thrift Supervision guidelines.


				Banking Subsidiaries
	First						FirstBank			To be well
	BanCorp			FirstBank			Florida			capitalized
As of September 30, 2008
Total capital (Total capital to risk-weighted assets)		13.06	%		12.41	%		11.51	%		10.00	%
Tier 1 capital ratio (Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets)		11.81	%		11.16	%		10.41	%		6.00	%
Leverage ratio (1)		8.38	%		7.92	%		7.52	%		5.00	%

As of December 31, 2007
Total capital (Total capital to risk-weighted assets)		13.86	%		13.23	%		10.92	%		10.00	%
Tier 1 capital ratio (Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets)		12.61	%		11.98	%		10.42	%		6.00	%
Leverage ratio (1)		9.29	%		8.85	%		7.79	%		5.00	%


(1)		~~$21.1 million~~Tier 1 capital to average assets in the case of ~~tax liability, including accrued interest~~First BanCorp and FirstBank and Tier 1 Capital to adjusted total assets in the case of $6.0 million, associated with unrecognized tax benefits under FIN 48 has been excluded due to the high degree of uncertainty regarding the timing of future cash outflows associated with such obligations.

~~(2)~~		~~Include $7.1 million of brokered CDs sold by third-party intermediaries in denominations of $100,000 or less, within FDIC insurance limits.~~FirstBank Florida.

The ~~Corporation has obligations~~decrease in regulatory capital ratios is mainly related to the increase in the volume of risk-weighted assets driven by the aforementioned purchases of MBS and ~~commitments~~a higher commercial and consumer loan portfolio. On October 7, 2008, the federal bank and thrift regulatory agencies announced a proposal to ~~make future payments under contracts,~~reduce from 20% to 10% the risk weight assigned to claims on, and portions of claims guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Claims include all credit exposures, such as senior and subordinated debt and ~~under other commitments to sell mortgage loans at fair value~~counterparty credit risk exposures, but do not include preferred or common stock. The adoption of this proposal may result in an increase of First BanCorp, FirstBank and ~~commitments to extend credit. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation~~FirstBank Florida regulatory capital ratios. As of ~~any condition established in the contract. Since certain commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon,~~September 30, 2008 the total ~~commitment~~capital ratio and Tier 1 capital ratio of First BanCorp would have increased to 13.6% and 12.3%, respectively, applying the aforementioned proposal.

The Corporation is well capitalized and positioned to manage economic downturns. The total regulatory capital ratio is 13.1% and the Tier 1 capital ratio is 11.8%. This translates to $413 million and $783 million of total capital and Tier 1 capital, respectively, in excess of the total capital and Tier 1 capital well capitalized requirements of 10% and 6%, respectively. The Corporation is evaluating the issuance of preferred stock through the U.S. Treasury’s recently announced Troubled-Asset Relief Program (TARP). The maximum amount ~~does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. In the case~~ of ~~credit cards and personal lines of credit,~~capital that the Corporation can ~~at any time~~issue is 3% of its risk-weighted assets. A capital raise of this nature would increase the total regulatory capital ratio to approximately 16%, or $800 million in excess of well capitalized requirement, and ~~without cause, cancels~~ the ~~unused credit facility. In~~Tier 1 capital ratio to approximately 14.7%, or approximately $1.2 billion in excess of the ~~ordinary course~~well capitalized requirement. For purposes of projected capital ratios shown above, a risk-weight factor of 20% was assigned to proceeds from the issuance of stock.

6674

The Corporation’s risk management policies are described below as well as in the ~~Management~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of First BanCorp’s 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

~~Interest Rate Risk Management~~Liquidity and Capital Adequacy

~~First BanCorp manages its asset/~~Liquidity is the ongoing ability to accommodate liability ~~position~~maturities and deposit withdrawals, fund asset growth and business operations, and meet contractual obligations through unconstrained access to funding at reasonable market rates. Liquidity management involves forecasting funding requirements and maintaining sufficient capacity to meet the needs and accommodate fluctuations in ~~order~~asset and liability levels due to ~~limit the effects of~~ changes in ~~interest rates~~our business operations or unanticipated events.

The Corporation manages liquidity at two levels. The first is the liquidity of the parent company, which is the holding company that owns the banking and nonbanking subsidiaries. The second is the liquidity of the banking subsidiaries. The Asset and Liability Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for establishing the Corporation’s liquidity policy as well as approving operating and contingency procedures, and monitoring liquidity on ~~net interest income.~~an ongoing basis. The Management’s Investment and Asset Liability Committee of the Corporation (“MIALCO”), using measures of liquidity developed by management, which involve the use of several assumptions, reviews the Corporation’s liquidity position on a monthly basis. The MIALCO oversees liquidity management, interest rate risk ~~liquidity management~~ and other related matters. The MIALCO, which reports to the ~~Investment Subcommittee of the~~ Board of Directors’ ~~Asset/~~Asset and Liability ~~Risk~~ Committee, is composed of senior management officers, including the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, the Chief Operating Officer, the Chief Risk Officer, the Wholesale Banking Executive, the Risk Manager of the Treasury and Investments Division, the Financial Risk Manager and the Treasurer. The Treasury and Investments Division is responsible for planning and executing the Corporation’s funding activities and strategy; monitors liquidity availability on a daily basis and reviews liquidity measures on a weekly basis. The Treasury and Investments Accounting and Operations area of the Comptroller’s Department is responsible for calculating the liquidity measurements used by the Treasury and Investment Division to review the Corporation’s liquidity position.

Sources of Funding

The Corporation utilizes different sources of funding to help ensure that adequate levels of liquidity are available when needed. Diversification of funding sources is of great importance to protect the Corporation’s liquidity from market disruptions. The principal sources of short-term funds are deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and lines of credit with the FHLB, the FED Discount Window Program, and other unsecured lines established with financial institutions. The Credit Committee of the Board of Directors reviews credit availability on a regular basis. In the past, the Corporation has securitized and sold mortgage loans as a supplementary source of funding. Commercial paper has also provided additional funding as well as long-term funding through the issuance of notes and long-term brokered CDs. The cost of these different alternatives, among other things, is taken into consideration.

Recent initiatives by the FED to ease the credit crisis have included, among other things, cuts to the discount rate, the availability of the TAF to provide short-term loans to banks and expanding the qualifying collateral it will lend against, to include commercial paper. Meanwhile the FDIC announced a program to strengthen confidence and encourage liquidity in the banking system by guaranteeing newly issued senior unsecured debt of banks, thrifts, and certain holding companies, and by providing full coverage of non-interest bearing deposit transaction accounts, regardless of dollar amount. The FDIC also raise the cap on deposit insurance coverage from $100,000 to $250,000 until December 31, 2009. Additional actions include the announcement of a federal government program to purchase stock in private U.S. financial firms, including banks. These actions made the federal government a viable source of funding in the current environment.

The Corporation’s principal sources of funding are:

Brokered CDs- A large portion of the Corporation’s funding is retail brokered CDs issued by the Bank subsidiary, FirstBank Puerto Rico. Total brokered CDs increased from $7.2 billion at year end 2007 to $8.4 billion at September 30, 2008. The Corporation has been issuing brokered CDs to finance its lending activities, pay off repurchase agreements issued to finance the purchase of MBS in the first half of 2008, accumulate additional liquidity due to current market volatility, and extend the maturity of its borrowings.

outstanding as of September 30, 2008 is approximately 3 years. Approximately 28% of the principal value of these certificates is callable at the Corporation’s option.

The use of brokered CDs has been particularly important for the growth of the Corporation. The Corporation encounters intense competition in attracting and retaining regular retail deposits in Puerto Rico. The brokered CDs market is very competitive and liquid, and the Corporation has been able to obtain substantial amounts of funding in short periods of time. This strategy enhances the Corporation’s liquidity position, since the brokered CDs are insured by the FDIC up to regulatory limits and can be obtained faster compared to regular retail deposits. Demand for brokered CDs has recently increased as a result of the move by investors from riskier investments, such as equities, to federally guaranteed instruments such as brokered CDs and the recent increase in FDIC deposit insurance from $100,000 to $250,000.

The following table presents a maturity summary of CDs with denominations of $100,000 or higher as of September 30, 2008.


(In thousands)	Total
Three months or less	$	1,762,077
Over three months to six months		1,222,191
Over six months to one year		1,912,439
Over one year		4,503,666

Total	$	9,400,373

Certificates of deposits with principal amounts of $100,000 or more include brokered deposits issued in the form of large ($100,000 or more) certificates of deposit that have been participated out by the broker in shares of less that $100,000.

Refer to the “Net Interest Income” discussion above for information about average balances of interest-bearing deposits, and the average interest rate paid on deposits for the quarters and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.

Credit Ratings

Cash Flows

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Capital


				Banking Subsidiaries
	First						FirstBank			To be well
	BanCorp			FirstBank			Florida			capitalized
As of September 30, 2008
Total capital (Total capital to risk-weighted assets)		13.06	%		12.41	%		11.51	%		10.00	%
Tier 1 capital ratio (Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets)		11.81	%		11.16	%		10.41	%		6.00	%
Leverage ratio (1)		8.38	%		7.92	%		7.52	%		5.00	%

As of December 31, 2007
Total capital (Total capital to risk-weighted assets)		13.86	%		13.23	%		10.92	%		10.00	%
Tier 1 capital ratio (Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets)		12.61	%		11.98	%		10.42	%		6.00	%
Leverage ratio (1)		9.29	%		8.85	%		7.79	%		5.00	%


(1)		Tier 1 capital to average assets in the case of First BanCorp and FirstBank and Tier 1 Capital to adjusted total assets in the case of FirstBank Florida.

The decrease in regulatory capital ratios is mainly related to the increase in the volume of risk-weighted assets driven by the aforementioned purchases of MBS and a higher commercial and consumer loan portfolio. On October 7, 2008, the federal bank and thrift regulatory agencies announced a proposal to reduce from 20% to 10% the risk weight assigned to claims on, and portions of claims guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Claims include all credit exposures, such as senior and subordinated debt and counterparty credit risk exposures, but do not include preferred or common stock. The adoption of this proposal may result in an increase of First BanCorp, FirstBank and FirstBank Florida regulatory capital ratios. As of September 30, 2008 the total capital ratio and Tier 1 capital ratio of First BanCorp would have increased to 13.6% and 12.3%, respectively, applying the aforementioned proposal.

The Corporation is well capitalized and positioned to manage economic downturns. The total regulatory capital ratio is 13.1% and the Tier 1 capital ratio is 11.8%. This translates to $413 million and $783 million of total capital and Tier 1 capital, respectively, in excess of the total capital and Tier 1 capital well capitalized requirements of 10% and 6%, respectively. The Corporation is evaluating the issuance of preferred stock through the U.S. Treasury’s recently announced Troubled-Asset Relief Program (TARP). The maximum amount of capital that the Corporation can issue is 3% of its risk-weighted assets. A capital raise of this nature would increase the total regulatory capital ratio to approximately 16%, or $800 million in excess of well capitalized requirement, and the Tier 1 capital ratio to approximately 14.7%, or approximately $1.2 billion in excess of the well capitalized requirement. For purposes of projected capital ratios shown above, a risk-weight factor of 20% was assigned to proceeds from the issuance of stock.

Off -Balance Sheet Arrangements

In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation engages in financial transactions that are not recorded on the balance sheet, or may be recorded on the balance sheet in amounts that are different than the full contract or notional amount of the transaction. These transactions are designed to (1) meet the financial needs of customers, (2) manage the Corporation’s credit, market or liquidity risks, (3) diversify the Corporation’s funding sources and (4) optimize capital.

As a provider of financial services, the Corporation routinely enters into commitments with off-balance sheet risk to meet the financial needs of its customers. These financial instruments may include loan commitments and standby letters of credit. These commitments are subject to the same credit policies and approval process used for on-balance sheet instruments. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the statements of financial position. As of September 30, 2008, commitments to extend credit and commercial and financial standby letters of credit amounted to approximately $1.7 billion and $103.8 million, respectively. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to customers as long as the conditions established in the contract are met. Generally, the Corporation’s mortgage banking activities do not enter into interest rate lock agreements with its prospective borrowers.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

The following table presents a detail of the maturities of the Corporation’s contractual obligations and commitments, which consist of CDs, long-term contractual debt obligations, commitments to sell mortgage loans and commitments to extend credit:


	Contractual Obligations and Commitments
	As of September 30, 2008
	Total		Less than 1 year		1-3 years		3-5 years		After 5 years
	(In thousands)
Contractual obligations (1):
Certificates of deposit (2)	$	10,213,604	$	5,552,263	$	2,639,326	$	571,085	$	1,450,930
Loans payable		300,000		300,000		—		—		—
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase		3,326,936		539,436		1,187,500		800,000		800,000
Advances from FHLB		986,000		544,000		211,000		231,000		—
Notes payable		26,725		—		7,452		6,828		12,445
Other borrowings		231,890		—		—		—		231,890

Total contractual obligations	$	15,085,155	$	6,935,699	$	4,045,278	$	1,608,913	$	2,495,265

Commitments to sell mortgage loans	$	23,126	$	23,126

Standby letters of credit	$	103,761	$	103,761

Commitments to extend credit:
Lines of credit	$	1,059,125	$	1,059,125
Letters of credit		48,135		48,135
Commitments to originate loans		551,180		551,180

Total commercial commitments	$	1,658,440	$	1,658,440


(1)		$22.0 million of tax liability, including accrued interest of $6.4 million, associated with unrecognized tax benefits under FIN 48 has been excluded due to the high degree of uncertainty regarding the timing of future cash outflows associated with such obligations.

(2)		Include $8.4 billion of brokered CDs sold by third-party intermediaries in denominations of $100,000 or less, within FDIC insurance limits.

The Corporation has obligations and commitments to make future payments under contracts, such as debt, and under other commitments to sell mortgage loans at fair value and commitments to extend credit. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Since certain commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. For most of the commercial lines of credit, the Corporation has the option to reevaluate the agreement prior to additional disbursements. There have been no

significant or unexpected draws on existing commitments. The funding needs patterns of the customers have not significantly changed as a result of the latest market disruptions. In the case of credit cards and personal lines of credit, the Corporation can, at any time and without cause, cancel the unused credit facility. In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation enters into operating leases and other commercial commitments. There have been no significant changes in such contractual obligations since December 31, 2007.

Interest Rate Risk Management

First BanCorp manages its asset/liability position in order to limit the effects of changes in interest rates on net interest income. The MIALCO oversees interest rate risk and meetings focus on, among other things, current and expected conditions in world financial markets, competition and prevailing rates in the local deposit market, liquidity, unrealized gains and losses in securities, recent or proposed changes to the investment portfolio, alternative funding sources and their costs, hedging and the possible purchase of derivatives such as swaps and caps, and any tax or regulatory issues which may be pertinent to these areas. The MIALCO approves funding decisions in light of the Corporation’s overall growth strategies and objectives. ~~On a quarterly basis, the MIALCO performs a comprehensive asset/liability review, examining interest rate risk as described below together with other issues such as liquidity and capital.~~

The Corporation performs on a quarterly basis a net interest income simulation analysis on a consolidated basis to estimate the potential change in future earnings from projected changes in interest rates. These simulations are carried out over a one-year and a five-year time horizon, assuming gradual upward and downward interest rate movements of 200 basis points, achieved during a twelve-month period. Simulations are carried out in two ways:

	~~(1)~~		~~using a static balance sheet as the Corporation had on the simulation date, and~~

	~~(2)~~		(1) using a static balance sheet as the Corporation had on the simulation date, and (2) using a growing balance sheet based on recent growth patterns and strategies.

The balance sheet is divided into groups of assets and liabilities detailed by maturity or re-pricing and their corresponding interest yields and costs. As interest rates rise or fall, these simulations incorporate expected future lending rates, current and expected future funding sources and costs, the possible exercise of options, changes in prepayment rates, ~~deposits~~deposit decay and other factors ~~which~~that may be important in projecting the future growth of net interest income.

The Corporation uses asset-liability management software to project future movements in the Corporation’s balance sheet and income statement. The starting point of the projections generally corresponds to the actual values of the balance sheet on the date of the simulations.

These simulations are highly complex, and use many simplifying assumptions that are intended to reflect the general behavior of the Corporation over the period in question. There can be no assurance that actual events will match these assumptions in all cases. For this reason, the results of these simulations are only approximations of the true sensitivity of net interest income to changes in market interest rates.

The following table presents the results of the simulations as of ~~June~~September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007. Consistent with prior ~~years,~~periods, these exclude non-cash changes in the fair value of derivatives and SFAS 159 liabilities:


				June 30, 2008												December 31, 2007									September 30, 2008												December 31, 2007
	Net Interest Income Risk (Projected for the next 12 months)												Net Interest Income Risk (Projected for the next 12 months)												Net Interest Income Risk (Projected for the next 12 months)												Net Interest Income Risk (Projected for the next 12 months)
	Static Simulation						Growing Balance Sheet						Static Simulation						Growing Balance Sheet						Static Simulation						Growing Balance Sheet						Static Simulation						Growing Balance Sheet
(Dollars in millions)	$ Change			% Change			$ Change			% Change			$ Change			% Change			$ Change			% Change			$ Change			% Change			$ Change			% Change			$ Change			% Change			$ Change			% Change
+200 bps ramp	$	(16.9	)		(2.99	)%	$	(16.1	)		(2.75	)%	$	(8.1	)		(1.64	)%	$	(8.4	)		(1.66	)%	$	10.5			2.01	%	$	10.0			1.81	%	$	(8.1	)		(1.64	)%	$	(8.4	)		(1.66	)%
-200 bps ramp	$	(5.1	)		(0.91	)%	$	(5.1	)		(0.87	)%	$	(13.2	)		(2.68	)%	$	(13.2	)		(2.60	)%	$	(15.3	)		(2.92	)%	$	(13.7	)		(2.48	)%	$	(13.2	)		(2.68	)%	$	(13.2	)		(2.60	)%

policy target levels. Interest rate risk, as measured by the sensitivity of net interest income to shifts in rates, changed ~~slightly in~~when compared to December 31, 2007. In order to reduce the ~~second quarter. During~~exposure to high levels of market volatility, during the first ~~half~~nine months of 2008, the Corporation ~~increased earning assets through~~has been extending the ~~purchase~~maturity of its funding sources by, among other things, entering into long-term repurchase agreements and issuing brokered CDs to longer terms. During the quarter ended September 30, 2008, the Corporation issued approximately ~~$3.2~~$1.4 billion ~~of fixed-rate U.S. government agency mortgage-backed securities. The increase included~~in brokered CDs with average maturities exceeding one year and reduced FHLB advances and regular repurchase agreements by more than $800 million when compared to the ~~replacement of $1.2 billion of U.S. Agency debentures that were called by the issuer; and net growth~~previous quarter ended June 30, 2008. Some of the ~~investment portfolio in response to favorable market conditions. The increase in volume of securities sold under~~FHLB advances and repurchase agreements ~~was aligned~~were replaced with long-term structured repurchase agreements with maturities exceeding 3 years. Also, the Corporation increased its loans portfolio by approximately $913 million since December 31, 2007; the increase ~~in mortgage-backed securities.~~

~~Also during~~was mainly driven by commercial loans tied to short-term LIBOR repricing; 30 years mortgages and the first half of 2008, $2.4 billion of interest rate swaps were cancelled prior to maturity by the counterparties under call option provisions. Due to the economic hedge effect of holding the swapped CD’s, approximately the same amount in brokered CD’s were called by the Corporation and re-issued in different maturity terms.

~~Assuming parallel shifts in interest rates, the Corporation’s net interest income would compress in rising rates scenarios and expand in falling rates scenarios over~~auto portfolio, which increased significantly as a ~~five-year modeling horizon, due to the current composition~~result of the ~~balance sheet. However, during~~previously mentioned auto loan portfolio purchased from Chrysler.

During the first 12 months of the income simulation, under a parallel falling rates scenario, net interest income is expected to compress ~~slightly~~ due to the embedded ~~option~~call options sold on U.S. Agency debentures, in the asset side of the balance sheet. In a declining rate scenario, the callable feature of the ~~U.S.~~US Agency debentures would shorten the duration of the assets, with the potential ~~trigger~~ of ~~calls that would~~triggering the call options; which could lead to ~~the Corporation to reinvest~~reinvestment of proceeds from called securities in lower yielding assets. Due to current market conditions and the drop in the long end of the yield curve during the third quarter of 2008, the probability of exercise of the embedded calls on approximately $949 million of US Agency debentures has increased and is expected to be effective in both, the base and falling rates scenarios; this, despite the fact that the lack of liquidity in the financial markets has caused several call dates go by during 2008 without the embedded calls being exercised.

Taking into consideration the above described facts for purpose modeling, the net interest income for the next twelve months in a growing balance sheet scenario, is estimated to decrease by $13.7 million in a parallel downward move of 200 basis points, and the change for the same period, is an increase of $10.0 million in a parallel upward move of 200 basis points. As noted, the impact of the callability feature in the Agency Securities and the reinvestment of those securities into lower yielding assets could result in a shift in the Corporation’s interest rate risk exposure from being in a liability sensitive position to an asset sensitive position for the first twelve months of the simulation. However, assuming parallel shifts in interest rates, the Corporation’s net interest income would continue to decrease in rising rates scenarios and expand in falling rates scenarios over a five-year modeling horizon.

The Corporation used the gap analysis tool to evaluate the potential effect of rate shocks on income over the selected time periods. The gap report as of September 30, 2008 showed a positive cumulative gap for 3 month of $1.3 billion and a negative cumulative gap of $1.0 billion for 1 year, compared to negative cumulative gaps of $2.3 billion and $1.6 billion for 3 months and 1 year, respectively, as of December 31, 2007. These results show that the Corporation is reducing the mismatch between the assets and the liabilities that reprice in the selected time period.

Derivatives

First BanCorp uses derivative instruments and other strategies to manage its exposure to interest rate risk caused by changes in interest rates beyond management’s control. The following summarizes major strategies, including derivatives activities, used by the Corporation in managing interest rate risk:

Structured repurchase agreements — The Corporation uses structured repurchase agreements, with embedded call options, to reduce the Corporation’s exposure to interest rate risk by lengthening the contractual maturities of its liabilities, while keeping funding costs low. Another type of structured repurchase agreement includes repurchased agreements with embedded cap corridors; these instruments also provide protection from a rising rate scenario.

For detailed information regarding the volume of derivative activities (e.g. notional amounts), location and fair values of derivative instruments in the Statements of Financial Condition and the amount of gains and losses reported in the Statements of Income, refer to Note 8 “Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” in the accompanying unaudited interim financial statements.

During the first ~~half~~nine months of 2008, approximately ~~$2.4~~$2.6 billion of interest rate swaps were ~~cancelled~~called by the counterparties, mainly due to lower 3-month LIBOR. Following the cancellation of the interest rate swaps, the Corporation exercised its call option on approximately ~~$2.4~~$2.5 billion swapped to floating brokered CDs. The Corporation recorded a net unrealized gain of ~~$4.4~~$4.8 million as a result of these transactions resulting from the reversal of the cumulative mark-to-market valuation of the swaps and the brokered CDs called.

Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc. (“Lehman”) was counterparty to the Corporation on certain interest rate swap agreements. During the third quarter of 2008, Lehman failed to pay the scheduled net cash settlement due to the Corporation, which constitutes an event of default under these interest rate swap agreements. The Corporation terminated all interest rate swaps with Lehman and replaced them with another counterparty under similar terms and conditions. As of September 30, 2008, the Corporation has an unsecured counterparty exposure with Lehman, which filed for bankruptcy on October 3, 2008, of approximately $1.4 million. This exposure has been reserved. Further, the Corporation is in the process of reviewing its options for the recovery of securities pledged under these agreements with Lehman to guarantee the Corporation’s performance thereunder. The market value of the pledged securities as of September 30, 2008 amounted to approximately $63 million. The Corporation believes that the securities pledged as collateral should not be part of the bankruptcy estate. At this early stage in the bankruptcy proceedings the Corporation is not able to determine whether it will succeed in recovering all or a substantial portion of the collateral or its equivalent value.

The use of derivatives involves market and credit risk. The market risk of derivatives stems principally from the potential for changes in the value of derivatives contracts based on changes in interest rates. The credit risk of derivatives arises from the potential of default from the counterparty. To manage this credit risk, the Corporation deals with counterparties of good credit standing, enters into master netting agreements whenever possible and, when appropriate, obtains collateral. Master netting agreements incorporate rights of set-off that provide for the net settlement of contracts with the same counterparty in the event of default. Currently, the Corporation is mostly engaged in derivative instruments with counterparties with a credit rating of single A or better. All of the Corporation’s interest rate swaps are supported by securities collateral agreements, which allow the delivery of securities to and from the counterparties depending on the fair value of the instruments, to minimize credit risk.

A “Hull-White Interest Rate Tree” approach is used to value the option components of derivative instruments. The discounting of the cash flows is performed using US dollar LIBOR-based discount rates. Although most of the derivative instruments are fully collateralized, a credit spread is considered for those that are not secured in full. The cumulative mark-to-market effect of credit risk in the valuation of derivative instruments resulted in an unrealized gain of approximately $0.9 million as of September 30, 2008 (an immaterial gain of approximately $13,000 relates to the first nine months of 2008). The Corporation compares the valuations obtained with valuations received from counterparties, as an internal control procedure.

7079

Set forth below is a detailed analysis of the Corporation’s credit exposure by counterparty with respect to derivative instruments outstanding as of September 30, 2008.


			As of September 30, 2008
					Total
					Exposure at		Negative			Total			Accrued interest
Counterparty	Rating (1)		Notional		Fair Value (2)		Fair Values			Fair Value			receivable (payable)
Interest rate swaps with rated counterparties:
JP Morgan Chase		AA-	$	728,358	$	1,290	$	(13,347	)	$	(12,057	)	$	742
Citigroup		AA-		388,982		—		(6,529	)		(6,529	)		2,694
Credit Suisse First Boston		AA-		182,621		32		(3,001	)		(2,969	)		103
UBS Financial Services, Inc.		AA-		16,304		—		(290	)		(290	)		147
Goldman Sachs		AA-		16,165		1,180		(158	)		1,022			60
Bank of Montreal		AA-		4,925		4		—			4			59
Merrill Lynch		A+		326,707		—		(5,625	)		(5,625	)		573
Wachovia		A+		16,570		—		(225	)		(225	)		26
Morgan Stanley		A		117,225		1,638		(1,107	)		531			152

				1,797,857		4,144		(30,282	)		(26,138	)		4,556
Other derivatives (3)				335,482		4,743		(3,847	)		896			(208	)

Total			$	2,133,339	$	8,887	$	(34,129	)	$	(25,242	)	$	4,348


(1)		Based on the S&P and Fitch Long Term Issuer Credit Ratings.

(2)		For each counterparty, this amount includes derivatives with positive fair value excluding the related accrued interest receivable/payable.

(3)		Credit exposure with several local companies for which a credit rating is not readily available. Approximately $4.5 million of the credit exposure with local companies relates to caps referenced to mortgages bought from R&G Premier Bank.

Credit Risk Management

First BanCorp is subject to credit risk mainly with respect to its portfolio of loans receivable and off-balance sheet instruments, mainly derivatives and loan commitments. Loans receivable represents loans that First BanCorp holds for investment and, therefore, First Bancorp is at risk for the term of the loan. Loan commitments represent commitments to extend credit, subject to specific ~~condition,~~conditions, for specific amounts and maturities. These commitments may expose the Corporation to credit risk and are subject to the same review and approval process as for loans. Refer to “Contractual Obligations and Commitments” above for further details. The credit risk of derivatives arises from the potential of the counterparty’s default on its contractual obligations. To manage this credit risk, the Corporation deals with counterparties of good credit standing, enters into master netting agreements whenever possible and, when appropriate, obtains collateral. For further details and information on the Corporation’s derivative credit risk exposure, refer to ~~“Interest~~"—Interest Rate Risk Management” ~~section~~discussion above. The Corporation manages its credit risk through credit policy, underwriting, and quality control procedures and an established delinquency committee. The Corporation also employs proactive collection and loss mitigation efforts. Also, there are Loan Workout functions responsible for avoiding defaults and minimizing losses upon default of commercial and construction loans. The group utilizes relationship officers, collection specialists and attorneys. In the case of residential construction projects, the workout function monitors project specifics, such as project management and marketing, as deemed necessary.

The Corporation may also have risk of default in the securities portfolio. The securities held by the Corporation are principally fixed-rate mortgage-backed securities and U.S. Treasury and agency securities. Thus, a substantial portion of these instruments are backed by mortgages, a guarantee of a U.S. government-sponsored entity or backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government and are deemed to be of the highest credit quality.

Management’s Credit Committee, comprised of the Corporation’s Chief Credit Risk Officer and other senior executives, has primary responsibility for setting strategies to achieve the Corporation’s credit risk goals and objectives. Those goals and objectives are documented in the Corporation’s Credit Policy.

Non-performing Assets and Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

The provision for loan and lease losses is charged to earnings to maintain the allowance for loan and lease losses at a level that the Corporation considers adequate to absorb probable losses inherent in the portfolio. The Corporation establishes the allowance for loan and lease losses based on its asset classification report to cover the total amount of any assets classified as a “loss,” the probable loss exposure of other classified assets, and the estimated probable losses of assets not classified. The adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses is also based upon a number of additional factors including historical loan and lease loss experience, current economic conditions, the fair value of the underlying collateral, and the financial condition of the borrowers, and, as such, includes amounts based on judgments and estimates made by the Corporation. Although management believes that the allowance for loan and lease losses is adequate, factors beyond the Corporation’s control, including factors affecting the economies of Puerto Rico, the United States (principally the state of Florida), the U.S.VI or British VI, may contribute to delinquencies and defaults, thus necessitating additional reserves.

For small, homogeneous loans, including residential mortgage loans, auto loans, consumer loans, finance lease loans, and commercial and construction loans in amounts under $1.0 million, the Corporation evaluates a specific allowance based on average historical loss experience for each corresponding type of loan and market conditions. The methodology of accounting for all probable losses is made in accordance with the guidance provided by SFAS 5, “Accounting for Contingencies.”

Commercial and construction loans in amounts over $1.0 million are individually evaluated on a quarterly basis for impairment in accordance with the provisions of SFAS ~~114, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan.”~~114. A loan is impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the

Corporation will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The impairment loss, if any, on each individual loan identified as impaired is generally measured based on the present value of expected cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate. As a practical expedient, impairment may be measured based on the loan’s observable market price, or the fair value of the collateral, if the loan is collateral dependent. If foreclosure is probable, the creditor is required to measure the impairment based on the fair value of the collateral. The fair value of the collateral is generally obtained from appraisals. Updated appraisals are obtained when the Corporation determines that loans are impaired and for certain loans on a spot basis selected by specific characteristics such as delinquency levels and loan-to-value ratios. Should the appraisal show a deficiency, the Corporation records an allowance for loan losses related to these loans.

As a general procedure, the Corporation internally reviews appraisals on a spot basis as part of the underwriting and approval process. For construction loans in ~~the~~its Miami ~~Agency,~~Corporate Banking operations, appraisals are reviewed by an outsourced contracted appraiser. Once a loan backed by real estate collateral deteriorates or is accounted for in non-accrual status, a full assessment of the value of the collateral is performed. If the Corporation commences litigation to collect an outstanding loan or commences foreclosure proceedings against a borrower (which includes the collateral), a new appraisal report is requested and the book value is adjusted accordingly, either by a corresponding reserve or a charge-off.

The Credit Risk area requests new collateral appraisals for impaired collateral dependent loans. In order to determine present market conditions in Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands, and to gauge property appreciation rates, opinions of value are requested for a sample of delinquent residential real estate loans. The valuation information gathered through these appraisals is considered in the Corporation’s allowance model assumptions.

Substantially all of the Corporation’s loan portfolio is located within the boundaries of the U.S. economy. Whether the collateral is located in Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands or the U.S. mainland, the performance of the Corporation’s loan portfolio and the value of the collateral backing the transactions are dependent upon

The following tables set forth an analysis of the activity in the allowance for loan and lease losses during the periods indicated :


	Quarter ended						Six Month Period Ended						Quarter ended						Nine Month Period Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						September 30,						September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2008			2007			2008			2007			2008			2007			2008			2007
Allowance for loan and lease losses, beginning of period	$	210,495		$	161,419		$	190,168		$	158,296		$	222,272		$	165,009		$	190,168		$	158,296
Provision for loan and lease losses		41,323			24,628			87,116			49,542			55,319			34,260			142,435			83,802

Loans charged-off:
Residential real estate		(1,129	)		(1,102	)		(2,368	)		(1,267	)		(1,649	)		(107	)		(4,017	)		(1,374	)
Commercial		(11,350	)		(2,520	)		(15,768	)		(5,777	)		(6,391	)		(2,906	)		(22,159	)		(8,683	)
Construction		(2,526	)		(5	)		(6,311	)		(8	)		(1,176	)		(160	)		(7,487	)		(168	)
Finance leases		(2,061	)		(2,292	)		(4,976	)		(4,418	)		(2,591	)		(3,167	)		(7,567	)		(7,585	)
Consumer		(14,536	)		(16,500	)		(29,565	)		(34,126	)		(15,368	)		(16,833	)		(44,933	)		(50,959	)
Recoveries		2,056			1,381			3,976			2,767			2,417			1,390			6,393			4,157

Net charge-offs		(29,546	)		(21,038	)		(55,012	)		(42,829	)		(24,758	)		(21,783	)		(79,770	)		(64,612	)

Other adjustments (1)														8,337			—			8,337			—

Allowance for loan and lease losses, end of period	$	222,272		$	165,009		$	222,272		$	165,009		$	261,170		$	177,486		$	261,170		$	177,486

Allowance for loan and lease losses to period end total loans receivable		1.82	%		1.47	%		1.82	%		1.47	%		2.06	%		1.57	%		2.06	%		1.57	%
Net charge-offs annualized to average loans outstanding during the period		0.97	%		0.75	%		0.91	%		0.77	%		0.79	%		0.77	%		0.87	%		0.77	%
Provision for loan and lease losses to net charge-offs during the period		1.40x			1.17x			1.58x			1.16x			2.23	x		1.57	x		1.79	x		1.30	x

The U.S. mainland real estate market also has slowed, influenced, among other things, by increases in property taxes and insurance premiums, the tightening of credit origination standards, overbuilding in certain areas and general market economic conditions that may threaten the performance of the Corporation’s loan portfoliocondo-conversion loans in the U.S. mainland ~~principally~~(mainly in the ~~Corporation’s~~state of Florida) affected by the continuing deterioration in the health of the economy, an oversupply of new homes and declining housing prices in the United States. To a lesser extent, the Corporation also increased its reserves factors for the residential mortgage and construction loan portfolio from the 2007 level to account for the increased credit risk tied to recessionary conditions in Puerto Rico’s economy. The Puerto Rico housing market has not seen the ~~Miami Agency. Approximately 39% of the Corporation’s exposure~~dramatic decline in housing prices that is affecting the U.S. mainland, but there is ~~comprised of construction loans. Refer~~a lower demand due to ~~“Loan Portfolio — Commercial and Construction Loans” discussion above for detailed information about~~ the ~~Corporation’s construction loan portfolio.~~

diminished consumer purchasing power. The Corporation also does business in the Eastern Caribbean Region. Growth has been fueled by an expansion in the construction, residential mortgage and small loan business sectors. Refer to “Provision and Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses” and “Loan Portfolio — Commercial and Construction Loans” discussion above for specific details about troubled loan relationships and, the exposure to the geographic segments where the Corporation operates and detailed information about the Corporation’s construction loan portfolio.

~~The Corporation identified in~~During the first ~~half~~nine months of 2008, the Corporation identified several commercial and construction loans amounting to ~~$239.6~~$321.5 million that it determined should be classified as impaired, of which ~~$188.6~~$285.0 million ~~had~~have a specific reserve of ~~$27.4~~$57.1 million. ~~Most~~Approximately $211.1 million of the ~~new~~$321.5 million commercial and construction loans ~~identified~~that were determined to be impaired during 2008 is related to the Miami Corporate Banking operation, mainly condo conversion loans. As of September 30, 2008, approximately ~~77%~~$182.2 million, or 73%, ~~for which~~of a total portfolio originally disbursed as condo-conversion amounting to $251 million is considered impaired with a specific reserve ~~was allocated are construction loans originated by the Miami Agency. At the same time,~~of $31.4 million.

Meanwhile, the Corporation’s impaired loans decreased by approximately ~~$53.8~~$64.0 million during the first ~~half~~nine months of 2008 principally as a result of foreclosed loans inrelated to the Miami ~~Agency~~Corporate Banking operations, with a principal balance of approximately $22.4 million, which had a related impairment reserve of $4.2 million at the time of ~~foreclosure and~~foreclosure. Also, a loan was sold, inrelated to the Miami ~~Agency~~operations, that carried a principal balance of approximately $24.1 million with a related impairment reserve of $2.4 million at the time of sale. The latter was sold for $22.5 million during the second quarter of 2008. ~~Refer to “Non-accruing~~Other decreases in impaired loans may include loans paid in full, loans no longer considered impaired and ~~Non-performing Assets” discussion below for additional information.~~loans charged-off.

The Corporation continues its constant monitoring of ~~the Miami Agency~~its construction and commercial loan portfolio ~~due to susceptibility to current general market conditions and real estate trends in~~on the U.S. ~~market~~mainland and ~~had~~ obtained new appraisals during 2008 for more than ~~94%~~93% of the entire portfolio originally disbursed as condo-conversion ~~construction loan portfolio in the~~loans on its Miami ~~Agency.~~Corporate Banking operations.

Net charge-offs for the ~~second~~third quarter and first ~~half~~nine months of 2008 were ~~$29.5~~$24.8 million and ~~$55.0~~$79.8 million, respectively ~~(0.97%~~(0.79% and ~~0.91%~~0.87%, respectively, of average loans on an annualized basis), compared to ~~$21.0~~$21.8 million and ~~$42.8~~$64.6 million ~~(0.75% and 0.77%, respectively,~~(0.77% of average loans on an annualized ~~basis)~~basis for each period) for the same periods in 2007. The increase in net charge-offs for the 2008 periods, compared to 2007, was mainly associated with the Corporation’s commercial and construction loan portfolio including a $9.1 million charge-off for the second quarter of 2008 related to the previously reported participation in a syndicated commercial loan ~~collateralized by a marina, commercial real estate, and a high-end apartment complex~~ in the U.S. Virgin Islands and ~~$2.4~~$6.2 million in charge-offs for the ~~second quarter of 2008 ($6.2 million for the~~ first half of ~~2008)~~2008 related to the above mentioned repossession and sale of loans inof its Miami Corporate Banking operations. Despite the ~~Miami Agency. Notwithstanding this~~ increase, the Corporation experienced a decrease in net charge-offs for consumer loans ~~that~~which amounted to ~~$13.4~~$13.5 million and ~~$27.3~~$40.8 million for the ~~second~~third quarter and first ~~half~~nine months of 2008, respectively, as compared to ~~$15.5~~$15.9 million and ~~$32.2~~$48.1 million for the ~~second~~third quarter and first ~~half~~nine months of 2007. The decrease in net charge offs as compared to 2007 ~~respectively, that reflects~~is attributable to the ~~effect of~~ changes in underwriting standards ~~since~~implemented in late 2005 onand as a consumer loan portfolio with an average life of approximately four years ~~as the consumer loan portfolio is~~has been replenished by new originations under these revised standards. Recoveries made from previously written-off accounts were $2.1 million and $4.0 million for the second quarter and first half of 2008, respectively, compared to $1.4 million and $2.8 million, respectively, for the same periods in 2007.

7483

The following table presents annualized charge-offs to average loans held-in-portfolio by geographic segment:


	For the Quarter Ended			For the Quarter Ended			For the Nine Month Period Ended			For the Nine Month Period Ended
	September 30, 2008			September 30, 2007			September 30, 2008			September 30, 2007
PUERTO RICO:
Residential mortgage loans		0.18	%		0.02	%		0.18	%		0.09	%
Commercial loans		0.46	%		0.28	%		0.32	%		0.26	%
Construction loans		0.55	%		0.10	%		0.22	%		0.02	%
Consumer loans (1)		2.85	%		3.72	%		3.00	%		3.58	%
Total loans		0.87	%		0.95	%		0.79	%		0.93	%

VIRGIN ISLANDS:
Residential mortgage loans		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.03	%		0.00	%
Commercial loans (2)		0.14	%		-0.02	%		6.16	%		0.14	%
Construction loans		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.00	%
Consumer loans		3.39	%		1.70	%		3.24	%		2.04	%
Total loans		0.50	%		0.26	%		1.78	%		0.37	%

UNITED STATES:
Residential mortgage loans		0.47	%		0.00	%		0.18	%		0.00	%
Commercial loans		0.63	%		0.00	%		0.28	%		0.00	%
Construction loans		0.00	%		0.00	%		1.36	%		0.00	%
Consumer loans		3.98	%		2.16	%		4.26	%		2.17	%
Total loans		0.45	%		0.06	%		0.85	%		0.05	%


(1)		Includes Lease Financing.

(2)		Loan recoveries for the third quarter 2007 in Virgin Islands exceeded loan charge-offs.

Non-accruing and Non-performing Assets

�� Total non-performing assets are the sum of non-accruing loans, foreclosed real estate and other repossessed properties. Non-accruing loans are loans as to which interest is no longer being recognized. When loans fall into non-accruing status, all previously accrued and uncollected interest is reversed and charged against interest income.

Non-accruing Loans Policy

Residential Real Estate Loans- The Corporation classifies real estate loans in non-accruing status when interest and principal have not been received for a period of 90 days or more.

Commercial and Construction Loans- The Corporation places commercial loans (including commercial real estate and construction loans) in non-accruing status when interest and principal have not been received for a period of 90 days or more. The risk exposure of this portfolio is diversified as to individual borrowers and industries among other factors. In addition, a large portion is secured with real estate collateral.

Finance Leases- Finance leases are classified in non-accruing status when interest and principal have not been received for a period of 90 days or more.

Consumer Loans- Consumer loans are classified in ~~non accruing~~non-accruing status when interest and principal have not been received for a period of 90 days or more.

Other Real Estate Owned (OREO)

OREO acquired in settlement of loans is carried at the lower of cost (carrying value of the loan) or fair value less estimated costs to sell the real estate at the date of acquisition (estimated realizable value).

Other Repossessed Property

The other repossessed property category includes repossessed boats and autos acquired in settlement of loans. Repossessed boats and autos are recorded at the lower of cost or estimated realizable value.

Past Due Loans

Past due loans are accruing loans, which are contractually delinquent for 90 days or more. Past due loans are either current as to interest but delinquent in the payment of principal or are insured or guaranteed under applicable FHA and VA programs.

The Corporation may also classify loans in non-accruing status and recognize revenue only when cash payments are received because of the deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower and payment in full of principal or interest is not expected. ~~The Corporation started during~~During the third quarter of 2007, the Corporation started a loan loss mitigation program providing homeownership preservation assistance. Loans modified through this program are reported as non-performing loans and interest is recognized on a cash basis. When there is reasonable assurance of repayment and the borrower has made payments over a sustained period, the loan is returned to accruing status.

7585

depend on the length of time, the amount of professional assistance required, the amount of proceeds upon the disposition of the collateral and other factors not susceptible to current estimation.

In Puerto Rico, non-performing assets increased by $93.0 million from balances as of December 31, 2007 driven by increases in the residential and commercial non-performing loan portfolio. The ~~decrease~~increase in non-accruing ~~consumer~~commercial loans resulted from successful collection efforts and net charge-offs of approximately $13.4 million and $27.3 million for the second quarter and first half of 2008, respectively. Consumer loan delinquencies have shown signs of improvement, particularly in the auto loan portfolio, and the net charge offsis related to ~~average loans ratio on the consumer portfolio (including finance leases) improved during the quarter to 3.02% from 3.20% for the first quarter of 2008.~~

~~Although the balance of non-accruing residential mortgage loans increased by $21.2 million due to~~continuing adverse economic conditions in Puerto Rico, including the classification as ~~compared~~non-accrual of approximately $33.1 million impaired commercial loans identified during 2008. Increases in the Puerto Rico’s non-accruing construction loans portfolio was driven by the classification as non-accrual of a $15.2 million impaired loan extended for land development and construction of a residential housing project in Puerto Rico. The weakening economic conditions in Puerto Rico have also affected the volume of non-performing residential mortgage loans, which increased by $28.2 million, however, the non-performing to ~~the balance as of December 31, 2007,~~total loan ratio for this portfolio ~~has~~ remained ~~stable since the end~~flat. The relative stability of ~~the first quarter of 2008 due to improved collection efforts and~~non-performing residential loans in Puerto Rico reflects, to some extent, to the positive impact of loans modified through the loan loss mitigation ~~program that were returned to accruing status as borrowers have made consistent payments over a sustained period.~~program. Since the inception of the loan loss mitigation program in the third quarter of 2007, the Corporation has completed approximately ~~295~~335 loan modifications with an outstanding balance of approximately ~~$50.6 million.~~$55.3 million as of September 30, 2008. Of this amount, loans of approximately ~~$37.0 million were eligible to be returned to accruing status and $22.3~~$31.6 million have been returned to accruing status after a sustained period of repayments. Modifications involve changes in one or more of the loan terms that bring a defaulted loan current and provide sustainable affordability. Changes may include the refinancing of any past-due amounts, including interest and escrow, the extension of the maturity of the loans and modifications of the loan rate.

The Corporation’s residential mortgage loan portfolio amounted to $3.4 billion or approximately 28% of the total loan portfolio. More than 90% of the Corporation’s residential mortgage loan portfolio consist of fixed-rate, fully amortizing, full documentation loans that have a lower risk than the typical sub-prime loans that have affected and continue to affect the U.S. real estate market. The Corporation has not been active in negative amortization loans or adjustable rate mortgage loans (“ARMs”) with teaser rates. Historically, the Corporation has experienced a low rate of losses on its residential real estate portfolio, given that the real estate market in Puerto Rico has not shown notable declines in the market value of properties in almost four decades, overall comfortable loan-to-value ratios, and the limited amount of construction considering Puerto Rico is an island with finite land recourses. The net charge-offs to average loans ratio on the Corporation’s residential mortgage loan portfolio ~~was 0.14%~~were 0.19% and ~~0.15%~~0.16% for the ~~second~~third quarter and first ~~half~~nine months of 2008, respectively, and 0.03% for the year ended on December 31, 2007, significantly lower than in the United States mainland market.

With respect to the U.S. Virgin Islands, a third party purchased, during the third quarter of 2008, the outstanding debt related to a syndicated commercial loan in the U.S. Virgin Islands on which the Corporation had a participation and that was placed in non-accrual in the second quarter of 2008. The purchase agreement provided a full release of the borrower’s obligation to the participant banks, thus the carrying value of approximately $13.0 million on this participation was taken out of non-accrual during the third quarter of 2008. On September 15, 2008, the Corporation collected approximately $6.5 million from this borrower. The remaining balance of approximately $6.5 million is due on January 14, 2009.

The non-accruing consumer loan portfolio, mainly composed of Puerto Rico loans, reflects a decrease of $6.0 million, from December 31, 2008, principally related to the auto loan portfolio. This portfolio continues to show signs of stability and benefited from changes in underwriting standards implemented in late 2005. The consumer loan portfolio with an average life of approximately four years has been replenished by new originations under revised standards.

In view of current conditions in the Unites States housing market and weakening economic conditions in Puerto Rico, the Corporation may experience further deterioration on its portfolio, in particular the commercial and construction loan portfolio.

7787

~~Liquidity Risk~~

In order to ensure adequate liquidity through the full range of potential operating environments and market conditions, the liquidity management and business activities are conducted in a manner that will preserve and enhance funding stability, flexibility and diversity. Key components of this operating strategy include a strong focus on customer-based funding, maintaining direct relationships with wholesale market funding providers, and maintaining the ability to liquefy certain assets when, and if, requirements warrant.

The Corporation utilizes different sources of funding to help ensure that adequate levels of liquidity are available when needed. Diversification of funding sources is of great importance to protect the Corporation’s liquidity from market disruptions. The principal sources of short-term funds are deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and lines of credit with the FHLB, the Federal Reserve Discount Window program, and other unsecured lines established with financial institutions. MIALCO reviews credit availability on a regular basis. The Corporation has securitized and sold mortgage loans as supplementary sources of funding. Also, broker dealers have provided additional funding through the issuance of notes and long-term brokered certificates of deposit. The cost of these different alternatives, among other things, is taken into consideration. The Corporation’s principal uses of funds are the origination of loans and the repayment of maturing deposit accounts and borrowings.

Over the last four years, the Corporation has committed substantial resources to its mortgage banking subsidiary, FirstMortgage Inc., with the goal of becoming a leading institution in the highly competitive residential mortgage loans market. As a result, residential real estate loans as a percentage of total loans receivable have increased over time from 14% at December 31, 2004 to 28% at June 30, 2008. Commensurate with the increase in its mortgage banking activities, the Corporation has also invested in technology and personnel to enhance the Corporation’s secondary mortgage market capabilities. The enhanced capabilities improve the Corporation’s liquidity profile as it allows the Corporation to derive, if needed, liquidity from the sale of mortgage loans in the secondary market. Recent disruptions in the credit markets and a reduced investors’ demand for mortgage debt have adversely affected the liquidity of the secondary mortgage markets.

The U.S. (including Puerto Rico) secondary mortgage market is still highly liquid in large part because of the sale or guarantee programs of the FHA, VA, HUD, FNMA and FHLMC. The troubled housing and mortgage markets in the United States have raised concerns about the capacity of U.S. government sponsored entities to raise money from investors to cover rising losses from loan defaults, and potential bail out by the government. However the federal government recently passed legislation expanding the government’s line of credit to the agencies and allowing the government to buy shares of the agencies if needed. Also, the Federal Reserve agreed to open its discount window to the agencies.

A large portion of the Corporation’s funding is retail brokered CDs issued by the Bank subsidiary. In the event that the Corporation’s Bank subsidiary falls below the ratios of a well-capitalized institution, it faces the risk of not being able to replace funding through this source. The Bank currently complies with the minimum requirements of ratios for a “well-capitalized” institution and does not foresee falling below required levels to issue brokered deposits. In addition, the average term to maturity of the retail brokered CDs was approximately 3.3 years as of June 30, 2008. Approximately 29.5% of the value of these certificates is callable at the Corporation’s option.

The Corporation maintains a basic surplus (cash, short-term assets minus short-term liabilities, and secured lines of credit) in excess of a 5% self-imposed minimum limit over total assets. As of June 30, 2008, the basic surplus ratio of approximately 5.22% included un-pledged assets, Federal Home Loan Bank lines of credit, the Federal Reserve Discount Window Program, and cash. Access to regular and customary sources of funding have remained unrestricted, including the repurchase agreements, given the liquidity and credit quality of the securities held in portfolio. The Corporation does not rely on uncommitted inter-bank lines of credit (federal funds lines) to fund its operations; and does not include them on the basic surplus computation. The Corporation’s exposure to non-rated or sub-prime mortgage-backed securities is not-material; therefore, it is not subject to liquidity threats stemming from such exposure.

Operational Risk

The Corporation faces ongoing and emerging risk and regulatory pressure related to the activities that surround the delivery of banking and financial products. Coupled with external influences such as market conditions, security risks, and legal risk, the potential for operational and reputational loss has increased. In order to mitigate and control operational risk, the Corporation has developed, and continues to enhance, specific internal controls, policies and procedures that are designated to identify and manage operational risk at appropriate levels throughout the organization. The purpose of these mechanisms is to provide reasonable assurance that the Corporation’s business operations are functioning within the policies and limits established by management.

The Corporation classifies operational risk into two major categories: business specific and corporate-wide affecting all business lines. For business specific risks, a risk assessment group works with the various business units to ensure consistency in policies, processes and assessments. With respect to corporate-wide risks, such as information security, business recovery, legal and compliance, the Corporation has specialized groups, such as the Legal Department, Information Security, Corporate Compliance, Information Technology and Operations. These groups assist the lines of business in the development and implementation of risk management practices specific to the needs of the business groups.

Legal and Regulatory Risk

Legal and regulatory risk includes the risk of non-compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements, the risk of adverse legal judgments against the Corporation, and the risk that a counterparty’s performance obligations will be unenforceable. The Corporation is subject to extensive regulation in the different jurisdictions in which it conducts it business, and this regulatory scrutiny has been significantly

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In the opinion of the Company’s management, the pending and threatened legal proceedings of which management is aware will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Corporation.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

For a detailed discussion of certain risk factors that could affect First BanCorp’s operations, financial condition or results for future periods see the risk factors below and Item 1A, Risk Factors, in First BanCorp’s 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Adverse Credit Market Conditions may affect the Corporation’s ability to meet liquidity needs

The credit markets have been experiencing extreme volatility and disruption for more than twelve months. In recent weeks, the volatility and disruptions have reached unprecedented levels. In some cases, the markets have exerted downward pressures on availability of liquidity and credit capacity for certain issuers.

The Corporation needs liquidity to, among other things, pay its operating expenses, interest on its debt and dividends on its capital stock, maintain its lending activities and replace certain maturing liabilities. Without sufficient liquidity, the Corporation may be forced to curtail its operations. The availability of additional financing will depend on a variety of factors such as market conditions, the general availability of credit and the Corporation’s credit ratings and credit capacity. The Corporation’s financial condition and cash flows could be materially affected by disruptions in financial markets.

There can be no assurance that actions of the U.S. Government, Federal Reserve and Other Governmental and Regulatory Bodies for the purpose of stabilizing the financial markets will achieve the intended effect

In response to the financial crisis affecting the banking system and financial markets and going concern threats to investment banks and other financial institutions, on October 3, 2008, President Bush signed the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act (“EESA”) into law. Pursuant to the EESA, the U.S. Treasury has the authority to, among other things, purchase up to $700 billion of mortgage-backed and other securities from financial institutions for the purpose of stabilizing the financial markets. The Federal Government, Federal Reserve and other governmental and regulatory bodies have taken or are considering taking other actions to address the financial crisis. There can be no assurance as to what impact such actions will have on the financial markets, including the extreme levels of volatility currently being experienced. Such continued volatility could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, or the trading price of our common stock.

The Failure of Other Financial Institutions could adversely affect the Corporation

The Corporation has exposure to different counterparties, including brokers and dealers, investment banks and commercial banks. Many of these transactions expose the Corporation to credit risk in the event of default of the counterparty. In addition, with respect to secured transactions with derivative instruments, the Corporation may be at risk of not being able to recover all assets pledged. Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc. (“Lehman”) was counterparty to the Corporation on certain interest rate swap agreements. During the third quarter of 2008, Lehman failed to pay the scheduled net cash settlement due to the Corporation, which constitutes an event of default under these interest rate swap agreements. The Corporation terminated all interest rate swaps with Lehman and replaced them with another counterparty under similar terms and conditions. As of September 30, 2008, the Corporation has an unsecured counterparty exposure with Lehman, which filed for bankruptcy on October 3, 2008, of approximately $1.4 million. This exposure has been reserved. Further, the Corporation is in the process of reviewing its options for the recovery of securities pledged under these agreements with Lehman to guarantee the Corporation’s performance thereunder. The market value of the pledged securities as of September 30, 2008 amounted to approximately $63 million. The Corporation believes that the securities pledged as collateral should not be part of the bankruptcy estate. At this early stage in the bankruptcy proceedings the Corporation is not able to determine whether it will succeed in recovering all or a substantial portion of the collateral or its equivalent value.

Changes in Accounting Standards issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or Other Standard-Setting Bodies may adversely affect the Corporation’s financial statements

The Corporation’s financial statements are subject to the application of GAAP, which is periodically revised and/or expanded. Accordingly, from time to time the Corporation is required to adopt new or revised accounting standards issued by recognized authoritative bodies, including the FASB. Market conditions have prompted accounting standard setters to promulgate new guidance which further interprets or seeks to revise accounting pronouncements related to financial instruments, structures or transactions as well as to issue new standards expanding disclosures. The impact of accounting pronouncements that have been issued but not yet implemented is disclosed in the Corporation’s annual and quarterly reports on Form 10-K and Form 10-Q. An assessment of proposed standards is not provided as such proposals are subject to change through the exposure process and, therefore, the effects on the Corporation’s financial statements cannot be meaningfully assessed. It is possible that future accounting standards that the Corporation is required to adopt could change the current accounting treatment that the Corporation applies to its consolidated financial statements and that such changes could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s financial condition and results of operations.

Further, the federal government, under the EESA, will conduct an investigation of fair value accounting during the fourth quarter of 2008 and has granted the SEC the authority to suspend fair value accounting for any registrant or group of registrants at its discretion. The impact of such actions on registrants who apply fair value accounting cannot be readily determined at this time; however, actions taken by the federal government could have a material adverse effect on the financial condition and results of operations of companies, including First BanCorp, that apply fair value accounting.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Not applicable.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not applicable.

8291


	PAGE
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements:
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition (Unaudited) as of ~~June~~September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007		4
Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited) -— Quarters ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008 and ~~June~~September 30, 2007 and ~~Six-months~~Nine-months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008 and ~~June~~September 30, 2007		5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) ~~- Six-months~~— Nine-months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008 and ~~June~~September 30, 2007		6
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited) — ~~Six-months~~Nine-months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008 and ~~June~~September 30, 2007		7
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive ~~(Loss)~~ Income (Unaudited) — Quarters ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008 and ~~June~~September 30, 2007 and ~~Six-months~~Nine-months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008 and ~~June~~September 30, 2007		8
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)		9
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		3840
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		8189
Item 4. Controls and Procedures		8189

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings		8290
Item 1A. Risk Factors		8290
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		8291
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities		8291
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		8392
Item 5. Other Information		8392
Item 6. Exhibits		8392

SIGNATURES
~~Section 302 Certification of the CEO~~EX-3.1
~~Section 302 Certification of the CFO~~EX-31.1
~~Section 906 Certification of the CEO~~EX-31.2
~~Section 906 Certification of the CFO~~EX-32.1
EX-32.2


	2007
Weighted-average stock price at grant date and exercise price	$	9.20
Stock option estimated fair value	$	2.40 - $2.45
Weighted-average estimated fair value	$	2.43
Expected stock option term (years)		4.31-4.59
Expected volatility		32	%
Expected dividend yield		3.0	%
Risk-free interest rate		5.1	%


	As of		As of		As of		As of
	June 30,		December 31,		September 30,		December 31,
	2008		2007		2008		2007
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
Impaired loans	$	335,523	$	151,818	$	407,348	$	151,818
Impaired loans with valuation allowance		206,456		66,941		296,351		66,941
Allowance for impaired loans		31,115		7,523		58,963		7,523


	Notional Amounts				Notional Amounts
	As of		As of		As of		As of
	June 30,		December 31,		September 30,		December 31,
	2008		2007		2008		2007
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
Economic undesignated hedges:

Interest rate contracts:
Interest rate swap agreements used to hedge fixed rate brokered certificates of deposit, notes payable and loans	$	1,829,801	$	4,244,473
Interest rate swap agreements used to hedge fixed rate brokered CDs, notes payable and loans					$	1,619,010	$	4,244,473
Written interest rate cap agreements		128,059		128,075		128,052		128,075
Purchased interest rate cap agreements		283,770		294,982		279,247		294,982

Equity contracts:
Embedded written options on stock index deposits and notes payable		53,515		53,515		53,515		53,515
Purchased options used to manage exposure to the stock market on embedded stock index options		53,515		53,515		53,515		53,515

	$	2,348,660	$	4,774,560	$	2,133,339	$	4,774,560


	As of			As of			As of			As of
	June 30,			December 31,			September 30,			December 31,
	2008			2007			2008			2007
	(Dollars in thousands)						(Dollars in thousands)
Pay fixed/receive floating (generally used to economically hedge variable rate loans):
Notional amount	$	79,840		$	80,212		$	79,349		$	80,212
Weighted-average receive rate at period end		4.39	%		7.09	%		4.59	%		7.09	%
Weighted-average pay rate at period end		6.76	%		6.75	%		6.75	%		6.75	%
Floating rates range from 167 to 252 basis points over 3-month LIBOR

Receive fixed/pay floating (generally used to economically hedge fixed-rate brokered CDs and notes payable):
Notional amount	$	1,749,961		$	4,164,261		$	1,539,661		$	4,164,261
Weighted-average receive rate at period end		5.32	%		5.26	%		5.32	%		5.26	%
Weighted-average pay rate at period end		2.82	%		5.07	%		3.15	%		5.07	%
Floating rates range from 2 basis points to 54 basis points over 3-month LIBOR


	As of December 31, 2007
	Less than 12 months				12 months or more				Total
			Unrealized				Unrealized				Unrealized
	Fair Value		Losses		Fair Value		Losses		Fair Value		Losses
	(In thousands)
Debt securities
Puerto Rico Government obligations	$	—	$	—	$	13,648	$	512	$	13,648	$	512
Mortgage-backed securities
FHLMC		48,202		40		3,436		71		51,638		111
GNMA		625		11		26,887		114		27,512		125
FNMA		285,973		274		221,902		1,058		507,875		1,332
Mortgage pass-through certificates		133,337		28,407		—		—		133,337		28,407
Corporate bonds		—		—		4,448		1,264		4,448		1,264
Equity securities		1,384		522		—		—		1,384		522

	$	469,521	$	29,254	$	270,321	$	3,019	$	739,842	$	32,273


(1)		Carryover of the allowance for loan losses related to a $218 million auto loan portfolio acquired in the third quarter of 2008.


	Asset Derivatives					Liability Derivatives					Asset Derivatives					Liability Derivatives
		As of		As of			As of		As of			As of		As of			As of		As of
		June 30,		December 31,			June 30,		December 31,			September 30,		December 31,			September 30,		December 31,
		2008		2007			2008		2007		Statement of	2008		2007		Statement of	2008		2007
	Balance Sheet	Fair		Fair		Balance Sheet	Fair		Fair		Financial Condition	Fair		Fair		Financial Condition	Fair		Fair
	Location	Value		Value		Location	Value		Value		Location	Value		Value		Location	Value		Value
				(Dollars in thousands)												(In thousands)
Economic undesignated hedges:

Interest rate contracts:
Interest rate swap agreements used to hedge fixed rate brokered certificates of deposit, notes payable and loans	Other Assets	$	284	$	213	Accounts payable and other liabilities	$	32,650	$	58,057
Interest rate swap agreements used to hedge fixed rate brokered CDs, notes payable and loans											Other assets	$	207	$	213	Accounts payable and other liabilities	$	30,281	$	58,057
Written interest rate cap agreements	Other Assets		—		—	Accounts payable and other liabilities		62		47	Other assets		—		—	Accounts payable and other liabilities		77		47
Purchased interest rate cap agreements	Other Assets		6,044		5,149	Accounts payable and other liabilities		—		—	Other assets		4,621		5,149	Accounts payable and other liabilities		—		—

Equity contracts:
Embedded written options on stock index deposits	Other Assets		—		—	Interest bearing deposits		1,723		4,375	Other assets		—		—	Interest-bearing deposits		1,424		4,375
Embedded written options on stock index notes payable	Other Assets		—		—	Notes payable		2,729		4,673	Other assets		—		—	Notes payable		2,347		4,673
Purchased options used to manage exposure to the stock market on embedded stock index options	Other Assets		4,706		9,339	Accounts payable and other liabilities		—		—	Other assets		4,059		9,339	Accounts payable and other liabilities		—		—

		$	11,034	$	14,701		$	37,164	$	67,152		$	8,887	$	14,701		$	34,129	$	67,152


(1)		Related to brokered CDs not elected for the fair value option under SFAS 159.


	As of June 30, 2008										As of September 30, 2008
	Fair Value Measurements Using										Fair Value Measurements Using
								Assets/ (Liabilities)										Assets/ (Liabilities)
(In thousands)	Level 1		Level 2			Level 3		at Fair Value			Level 1		Level 2			Level 3		at Fair Value
Callable brokered CDs (1)	$	—	$	(1,689,208	)	$	—	$	(1,689,208	)	$	—	$	(1,515,525	)	$	—	$	(1,515,525	)
Medium-term notes (1)		—		(13,407	)		—		(13,407	)		—		(12,445	)		—		(12,445	)
Securities available forsale (2)		13,367		3,930,672			115,190		4,059,229
Securities available for sale (2)												3,592		3,903,631			109,726		4,016,949
Derivative instruments (3)		—		(32,110	)		5,983		(26,127	)		—		(29,786	)		4,544		(25,242	)


(1)		Amounts represent items for which the Corporation has elected the fair value option under SFAS 159.

(2)		Carried at fair value prior to the adoption of SFAS 159.

(3)		Derivatives as of ~~June~~September 30, 2008 include derivative assets of ~~$11.0~~$8.9 million and derivative liabilities of ~~$37.1~~$34.1 million, all of which were carried at fair value prior to the adoption of SFAS 159.


	Changes in Fair Value for the Quarter Ended									Changes in Fair Values for the Six-Month Period Ended								Changes in Fair Value for the Quarter Ended								Changes in Fair Values for the Nine-Month Period Ended
	June 30, 2008, for items Measured at Fair Value Pursuant									June 30, 2008, for items Measured at Fair Value Pursuant								September 30, 2008, for items Measured at Fair Value Pursuant								September 30, 2008, for items Measured at Fair Value Pursuant
	to Election of the Fair Value Option									to Election of the Fair Value Option								to Election of the Fair Value Option								to Election of the Fair Value Option
	Unrealized Losses			Unrealized Losses			Total Changes in			Unrealized Losses			Unrealized Gains		Total Changes in								Total								Total
	and Interest			and Interest			Fair Value Unrealized Losses			and Interest			and Interest		Fair Value Unrealized								Changes in Fair Value								Changes in Fair Value
	Expense			Expense			and Interest Expense			Expense			Expense		(Losses) Gains and Interest			Unrealized Losses and			Unrealized Gains and		Unrealized (Losses) Gains			Unrealized Losses and			Unrealized Gains and		Unrealized (Losses) Gains
	included in			included in			Included in			included in			included in		Expense Included in			Interest Expense included			Interest Expense included		and Interest Expense			Interest Expense included			Interest Expense included		and Interest Expense
	Interest Expense			Interest Expense			Current-Period			Interest Expense			Interest Expense		Current-Period			in Interest Expense			in Interest Expense		included in			in Interest Expense			in Interest Expense		included in
	on Deposits (1)			on Notes Payable (1)			Earnings (1)			on Deposits (1)			on Notes Payable (1)		Earnings (1)
(In thousands)																		on Deposits (1)			on Notes Payable (1)		Current-Period Earnings (1)			on Deposits (1)			on Notes Payable (1)		Current-Period Earnings (1)
Callable brokered CDs	$	(1,320	)	$	—		$	(1,320	)	$	(99,992	)	$	—	$	(99,992	)	$	(22,841	)	$	—	$	(22,841	)	$	(122,833	)	$	—	$	(122,833	)
Medium-term notes		—			(211	)		(211	)		—			474		474			—			749		749			—			1,223		1,223

	$	(1,320	)	$	(211	)	$	(1,531	)	$	(99,992	)	$	474	$	(99,518	)	$	(22,841	)	$	749	$	(22,092	)	$	(122,833	)	$	1,223	$	(121,610	)


(1)		Changes in fair value for the quarter and ~~six-~~nine- month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008 include interest expense on callable brokered CDs of ~~$29.8~~$22.1 million, and ~~$78.9~~$100.9 million, respectively, and interest expense on medium-term notes of $0.2 million and ~~$0.4~~$0.6 million, respectively. Interest expense on callable brokered CDs and medium-term notes that have been elected to be carried at fair value under the provisions of SFAS 159 are recorded in interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income based on their contractual coupons.


Level 3 Instruments Only	Total Fair Value Measurements ( Quarter ended June 30, 2008)					Total Fair Value Measurements ( Six-month period ended June 30, 2008)
(In thousands)	Derivatives (1)		Securities Available For Sale (2)			Derivatives (1)		Securities Available For Sale (2)
Beginning balance	$	2,888	$	119,051		$	5,103	$	133,678
Total gains or (losses) (realized/unrealized):
Included in earnings		3,095		—			880		—
Included in other comprehensive income		—		3,025			—		(7,607	)
Principal repayments and amortization		—		(6,886	)		—		(10,881	)

Ending balance	$	5,983	$	115,190		$	5,983	$	115,190


	Changes in Unrealized Gains
Level 3 Instruments Only	Quarter Ended		Six-Month Period Ended
(In thousands)	June 30, 2008		June 30, 2008

Changes in unrealized gains relating to assets still held at reporting date (1) (2):

Interest income on loans	$	54	$	23
Interest income on investment securities		3,041		857

	$	3,095	$	880


	Changes in Unrealized (Losses) Gains
	Quarter Ended			Nine-Month Period Ended
(In thousands)	September 30, 2008			September 30, 2008
Changes in unrealized (losses) gains relating to assets still held at reporting date (1) (2):

Interest income on loans	$	(22	)	$	1
Interest income on investment securities		(1,416	)		(559	)

	$	(1,438	)	$	(558	)


(1)		Amount represents valuation of interest rate cap agreements which were carried at fair value prior to the adoption of SFAS 159.

(2)		Unrealized ~~gain~~loss of ~~$3.0~~$1.2 million and ~~unrealized loss~~ of ~~$7.6~~$8.8 million on Level 3 available for sale securities were recognized as part of other comprehensive income for the quarter and ~~six-month~~nine-month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008, respectively.


																							Losses recorded
																							for the Nine-
																			Valuation				month period
							Valuation		Losses recorded for		Losses recorded for								allowance as of		Losses recorded for		ended
							allowance as of		the Quarter ended		the Six-month period								September 30,		the Quarter ended		September 30,
	Carrying value as of June, 2008						June 30, 2008		June 30, 2008		ended June 30, 2008		Carrying value as of September 30, 2008						2008		September 30, 2008		2008
(In thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3								Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Loans receivable⁽¹⁾	$	—	$	—	$	175,341	$	31,115	$	21,896	$	40,685	$	—	$	—	$	237,388	$	58,963	$	36,707	$	61,213
Loans held for sale⁽²⁾		—		29,194		—		457		457		457
Other Real Estate Owned⁽³⁾		—		—		38,620		2,563		522		843
Other Real Estate Owned⁽²⁾														—		—		40,422		5,176		2,388		2,892


(1)		Mainly impaired commercial and construction loans. The impairment was generally measured based on the fair value of the collateral in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 114, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan.” The fair values are derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations but adjusted for specific characteristics and assumptions of the collateral (e.g. absorption rates), which are not market observable.

(2)		~~Fair value is primarily derived from quotations based on the mortgage-backed securities market.~~

~~(3)~~		The fair value is derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations but adjusted for specific characteristics and assumptions of the properties (e.g. absorption rates), which are not market observable. Valuation allowance is based on market valuation adjustments after the ~~transference~~transfer from the loan to the Other Real Estate Owned (“OREO”) portfolio.


1-		On a tax equivalent basis (see “Net Interest Income” discussion below).

2-		Non-interest expenses to the sum of net interest income and non-interest income. The denominator includes non-recurring income and changes in the fair value of derivative instruments and financial instruments measured at fair value under SFAS 159.


(1)		On an adjusted tax equivalent basis. The adjusted tax equivalent yield was estimated by dividing the interest rate spread on exempt assets by (1 less Puerto Rico statutory tax rate of 39%) and adding to it the cost of interest-bearing liabilities. When adjusted to a tax equivalent basis, yields on taxable and exempt assets are comparable. Changes in the fair value of derivative and unrealized gains or losses on SFAS 159 liabilities are excluded from interest income and interest expense ~~for average rate calculation purposes~~ because the changes in valuation do not affect interest paid or received.

(2)		Government obligations include debt issued by government sponsored agencies.

(3)		Unrealized gains and losses in available-for-sale securities are excluded from the average volumes.

(4)		Average loan balances include the average of non-accruing ~~loans, on which interest income is recognized when collected.~~loans.

(5)		Interest income on loans includes ~~$2.9~~$2.5 million and ~~$2.4~~$2.0 million for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008 and 2007, respectively, and ~~$5.4~~$7.9 million and ~~$5.9~~$9.0 million for the ~~six-month~~nine-month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, of income from prepayment penalties and late fees related to the Corporation’s loan portfolio.

(6)		Unrealized gains and losses on SFAS 159 liabilities are excluded from the average volumes.


(1)		Includes the purchase of a $218 million auto loan portfolio during the third quarter of 2008.


(1)		United States ~~construction loans~~loan portfolio include approximately ~~$250.4~~$251.2 million of loans originally disbursed as condo-conversion loans, ~~originated by the Miami Agency.~~for which a reserve of $31.4 million was allocated as of September 30, 2008.


(1)		For purposes of the above table, ~~above,~~ high-rise portfolio is composed of buildings with more than 7 ~~stories. As of June 30, 2008 is~~stories, mainly composed of two projects that represent approximately ~~77%~~75% of the Corporation’s total outstanding high-rise residential construction loan portfolio in Puerto Rico.

(2)		Mid-rise relates to buildings up to 7 stories.

(3)		During the third quarter of 2008, approximately $43.3 million of loans originally disbursed as condo-conversion construction loans have been formally reverted to income-producing loans and included as part of the commercial real estate portfolio.


(In thousands)
				(Dollars in thousands)
Total undisbursed funds under existing commitments	$	401,775		$	537,247


Construction loans in non-accrual status	$	49,283		$	72,203


Net charge offs — Construction loans (1)	$	6,311		$	7,333


Allowance for loan losses — Construction loans	$	46,120		$	71,967


Non-performing construction loans to total construction loans		3.36	%		4.88	%


Allowance for loan losses — construction loans to total construction loans		3.14	%		4.87	%


Net charge-offs (annualized) to total average construction loans (1)		0.86	%		0.66	%


(1)		Includes charge-offs of $6.2 million related to the repossession and sale of impaired loans in the Miami ~~Agency~~Corporate Banking operations.


(In thousands)
Under $300K	$	56,195	$	82,187
$300K-$600k		179,268		162,242
Over $600k		131,310		138,019

	$	366,773	$	382,448


	Carrying		Weighted		Carrying		Weighted
(Dollars in thousands)	amount		average yield %		amount		average yield %
U.S. Government and agencies obligations					$	948,904		5.77
Due within one year	$	8,415		1.12

Due after ten years		966,927		5.77		948,904		5.77

		975,342		5.73


Puerto Rico Government obligations
Due within one year		391		6.63		4,635		6.17
Due after one year through five years		13,485		4.96		10,329		4.51
Due after five years through ten years		25,039		5.80		24,176		5.84
Due after ten years		31,627		5.39		20,417		5.35

		70,542		5.46		59,557		5.47


Corporate bonds
Due after five years through ten years		790		7.70		520		7.70
Due after ten years		4,616		7.03		3,877		6.85

		5,406		7.13		4,397		6.95


Total		1,051,290		5.72		1,012,858		5.76

Mortgage-backed securities		4,802,405		5.28		4,736,952		5.30
Equity securities		1,646		—		1,195		1.94

Total investment securities — available-for-sale and held-to-maturity	$	5,855,341		5.36	$	5,751,005		5.38


														Payments Due by Period
														Maturity								Maturity
														Less Than		Maturity			Maturity			In Excess			Total
(In thousands)	Payments Due by Period													One Year		1-3 Years			3-5 Years			of 5 Years			Fair Value
	Maturity							Maturity
	Less Than		Maturity			Maturity		In Excess			Total
As of June 30, 2008	One Year		1-3 Years			3-5 Years		of 5 Years			Fair Value
As of September 30, 2008
Pricing from observable market inputs	$	43	$	(474	)	$	91	$	(31,770	)	$	(32,110	)	$	1	$	(411	)	$	(324	)	$	(29,052	)	$	(29,786	)
Pricing that consider unobservable market inputs		—		—			—		5,983			5,983			—		—			—			4,544			4,544

	$	43	$	(474	)	$	91	$	(25,787	)	$	(26,127	)	$	1	$	(411	)	$	(324	)	$	(24,508	)	$	(25,242	)


(1)		As of ~~June~~September 30, 2008, other real estate owned include approximately ~~$18.6~~$21.9 million ~~from the previously reported impaired relationship~~of foreclosed properties in the ~~Miami Agency.~~U.S. mainland.


~~31.1~~	-	~~CEO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.~~

~~31.2~~	-	~~CFO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.~~

~~32.1~~	-	~~CEO Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.~~

~~32.2~~	-	3.1 — By-Laws of First BanCorp, as amended effective April 29, 2008. 31.1 — CEO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 31.2 — CFO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 32.1 — CEO Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 32.2 — CFO Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


		First BanCorp. ~~Registrant~~
~~Date: August 11, 2008~~	~~By:~~	~~/s/ Luis M. Beauchamp~~
		~~Luis M. Beauchamp~~Registrant
		~~Chairman, President and~~ ~~Chief Executive Officer~~
Date: November 10, 2008		By:	/s/ Luis M. Beauchamp
		Luis M. Beauchamp
		Chairman, President and Chief
		Executive Officer

Date: ~~August 11,~~November 10, 2008		By:	/s/ Fernando Scherrer
		Fernando Scherrer
		Executive Vice President
		and Chief Financial Officer