UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM
10-Q

(Mark One)

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended JuneSeptember 30, 2023

OR

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ___________________
to ___________________

Commission File Number: file number
001-40384

TALARIS THERAPEUTICS,

TOURMALINE BIO, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Delaware

83-2377352

(State or other jurisdictionOther Jurisdiction of

incorporation

Incorporation or organization)

Organization)

(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

93 Worcester St.
Wellesley, MA

02481

27 West 24th Street, Suite 702
New York, NY
10010
(Address of principal executive offices)

Principal Executive Offices)

(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: Telephone Number, Including Area Code:
(646)
481-9832
Not Applicable
(502) 398-9250

Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

Trading

Symbol(s)

Symbol

Name of each exchange
on which registered

Common Stock, $0.0001 par value $0.0001 per share

TALS

TRML

The Nasdaq Global Market

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrantregistrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrantregistrant was required to file such reports),; and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    
Yes
  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrantregistrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation
S-T
232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrantregistrant was required to submit such files).    
Yes
  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated
filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,”company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule
12b-2
of the Exchange Act.

(Check one):

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated
filer

Smaller reporting company

Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the Registrantregistrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2
of the Exchange Act).    Yes      No  

As of August 1, 2023, the

The registrant had 42,764,165outstanding
20,336,741
 shares of common stock, $0.0001 par value per share, outstanding.as of November 10, 2023.


EXPLANATORY NOTE

On October 19, 2023, the Delaware corporation formerly known as “Talaris Therapeutics, Inc.” completed its previously announced merger transaction in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 22, 2023 (the “Merger Agreement”), by and among Talaris Therapeutics, Inc. (“Talaris”), Tourmaline Bio, Inc. (“Legacy Tourmaline”) and Terrain Merger Sub, Inc., a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Talaris (“Merger Sub”), pursuant to which Merger Sub merged with and into Legacy Tourmaline, with Legacy Tourmaline surviving as a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Talaris and the surviving corporation of the merger (the “Merger”). Additionally, as a result of the Merger, (i) Legacy Tourmaline changed its name from “Tourmaline Bio, Inc.” to “Tourmaline Sub, Inc.”, and (ii) Talaris changed its name from “Talaris Therapeutics, Inc.” to “Tourmaline Bio, Inc.” (the “Company”).

On October 19, 2023, in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, Talaris filed a Certificate of Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation effecting a 1-for-10 reverse stock split of Talaris’ common stock (the “Reverse Stock Split”). As a result of the Reverse Stock Split, the number of issued and outstanding shares of Talaris’ common stock immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split was reduced such that every 10 shares of Talaris’ common stock held by a stockholder immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split were combined and reclassified into one share of common stock after the Reverse Stock Split. Except where otherwise indicated, the information in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as of and for the periods prior to the effective time of the Merger gives effect to the Reverse Stock Split.

Because the Merger was consummated after the period covered by the financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the historical financial information included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2023, unless otherwise indicated or as the context otherwise requires, is that of Talaris prior to the Merger.

In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, unless the context indicates otherwise, the terms “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to (i) Talaris Therapeutics, Inc., for periods prior to the effectiveness of the Merger and (ii) Tourmaline Bio, Inc. (as a combined company) for periods following the effectiveness of the Merger.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains references to trademarks belonging to other entities, which are the property of their respective holders. We do not intend our use or display of other companies’ trade names or trademarks to imply a relationship with, or endorsement or sponsorship of us by, any other companies.


TOURMALINE BIO, INC.

FORM 10-Q


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

Page

PART I.

FINANCIAL INFORMATION1

Item 1.

Financial Statements (unaudited)1

Balance Sheets

1

PageStatements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss

2

Statements of Stockholder’s Equity

3

Statement of Cash Flows

4

Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)

5

PART I.Item 2.

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

1

Item 1.

Financial Statements (Unaudited)

1

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

1

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

2

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

3

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

4

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

5

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

19

22

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

31

34

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

31

34

PART II.

OTHER INFORMATION

32

36

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

32

36

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

32

36

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities, and Use of Proceeds, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

77

86

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

77

86

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

77

86

Item 5.

Other Information

77

86

Item 6.

Exhibits

78

Exhibits
86

Signatures

79

Signature88

i


SUMMARY OF THE MATERIAL RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH OUR BUSINESS

Our business is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including those described in Part II, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this “Quarterly Report”). The principal risks and uncertainties affecting our business include the following:

We may fail to complete, or there may be delays in completing, the proposed Merger with Tourmaline Bio that may materially and adversely affect our operations, business, financial results and/or stock price.
If the Merger or another strategic transaction is not consummated, our board of directors may decide to pursue a dissolution and liquidation. In such an event, the amount of cash available for distribution to our stockholders will depend heavily on the timing of such liquidation as well as the amount of cash that will need to be reserved for commitments and contingent liabilities.
We are substantially dependent on our remaining employees to facilitate the consummation of the Merger.
Even if we are successful in completing the Merger or a strategic transaction, we may be exposed to other operational and financial risks.
If we do not complete the Merger, we may face substantial competition for attractive counterparties for any proposed strategic transactions.
We have never paid, and other than in connection with the Merger, do not intend to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
Our corporate restructuring and the associated headcount reduction may not result in anticipated savings, could result in total costs and expenses that are greater than expected and could disrupt our business.
We may become involved in litigation, including securities class action litigation, that could divert management’s attention and harm the company’s business, and insurance coverage may not be sufficient to cover all costs and damages.
Should we resume development of a biopharmaceutical candidate, our business will substantially depend upon the successful development and regulatory approval of a biopharmaceutical candidate. If we are unable to obtain regulatory approval of a biopharmaceutical candidate, our business may be materially harmed.
We are a biotechnology company and we have incurred net losses since our inception. We anticipate that we will continue to incur significant net losses for the foreseeable future and may never achieve or maintain profitability.
We have not yet completed any registrational trials and have no history of commercializing products, which may make it difficult to evaluate the success of our business to date and to assess our future viability.
Our product candidates represent a novel therapeutic approach that could result in heightened regulatory scrutiny. The regulatory landscape that applies to biopharmaceutical candidates is rigorous, complex, uncertain and subject to change.
Clinical drug development involves a lengthy and expensive process with an uncertain outcome. Should we resume development of a biopharmaceutical candidate, the inability to successfully and timely conduct clinical trials and obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates would substantially harm our business.
Should we resume development of a biopharmaceutical candidate, delays or difficulties in the enrollment of patients in clinical trials, would have a material adverse effect on our business.
The results of preclinical studies or earlier clinical trials are not necessarily predictive of future results. Should we resume development of a biopharmaceutical candidate, any product candidate we advance into clinical trials, may not have favorable efficacy or safety in later clinical trials or receive regulatory approval.
Interim, “top line” or preliminary data from our clinical trials that we may announce or share with regulatory authorities from time to time may change as more patient data become available and are subject to audit and verification procedures that could result in material changes in the final data.
Should we resume production of a biopharmaceutical candidate, or associated conditioning regimens or treatment protocols, they may cause undesirable side effects that could delay or prevent their regulatory approval, limit the commercial profile of an approved label or result in significant negative consequences following any regulatory approval.
Even if we resume development of a biopharmaceutical candidate and receive regulatory approval, we will still face extensive ongoing regulatory requirements and continued regulatory review, which may result in significant additional expense, and our products may still face future development and regulatory difficulties.
Should we resume development of a biopharmaceutical candidate, we may fail to successfully operate our manufacturing facility, which could adversely affect our clinical trials and the commercial viability of our product candidates.
If our manufacturing facility is damaged or destroyed or production at our manufacturing facility is otherwise interrupted, our business would be negatively affected.
We have historically been dependent on a limited number of suppliers and, in some cases sole suppliers, for some of our components and materials used in our development process.
We have historically relied and may in the future rely on third parties to conduct our clinical trials and perform some of our research and preclinical studies. If these third parties do not satisfactorily carry out their contractual duties or fail to meet expected deadlines, our development programs may be delayed or subject to increased costs, each of which may have an adverse effect on our business and prospects.
As we do not have in-house research capabilities, we will depend on intellectual property licensed from third parties, and termination of any such licenses could result in the loss of significant rights, which would materially harm our business.


Should we resume development of a biopharmaceutical candidate, we expect such product candidates to be regulated as biological products, or biologics, and therefore they may be subject to competition sooner than anticipated.
Should we resume development of a biopharmaceutical candidate, we may be unable to obtain and maintain sufficient intellectual property protection for our product candidates and manufacturing process. If the scope of the intellectual property protection is not sufficiently broad, our ability to commercialize such product candidates successfully and to compete effectively may be adversely affected.
Our recent reductions in force may negatively impact employee morale and productivity. Further, uncertainties surrounding the future of our clinical programs may increase retention risk.
While positions have been eliminated, certain functions necessary to our reduced operations remain, and we may be unsuccessful in re-distributing duties and obligations to our remaining employees and consultants.


SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact are “forward-looking statements” for purposes offacts contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. 10-Q, including statements regarding our future results of operations and financial position, business strategy, product candidates, planned preclinical studies and clinical trials and results thereof, research and development costs, planned regulatory submissions, regulatory approvals, timing and likelihood of success, as well as plans and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that are in some cases beyond our control and may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.

In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminologyterms such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue” “could,” “estimate,” “expects,“expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “target,” “will,” or “would” or the negative of these terms or plural of those terms, andother similar expressions.

Forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q include, but are not limited to, statements about:

the success, cost and timing of our development activities, non-clinical studies and clinical trials;

the timing and outcome of our ability to consummate the proposed Merger with Tourmaline Bio;

our expectations regarding the safety or efficacy profile of potential biopharmaceutical product candidates;
our ability to advance any product candidate into or successfully complete any clinical trial;
our ability to obtain regulatory approval for any of biopharmaceutical product candidates;
our ability to successfully manufacture biopharmaceutical product candidates forcurrent and future clinical trials, or for commercial use, if approved;
and the ability to license additional intellectual property relating to anyreporting of data from those trials;

the therapeutic potential of TOUR006 and future product candidates;

our ability to commercialize products in light of

the intellectual property rights of others;

the success of competing therapies that are or become available;
our ability to obtain funding for our operations;
the commercialization of any biopharmaceutical product candidates, if approved;
our plansoperations, including funding necessary to research, develop and commercialize any biopharmaceutical product candidates;
our current and future agreements with third parties in connection with the development or commercialization of any biopharmaceutical product candidates, and any other approved product;subject to regulatory approvals:

our ability to extend our operating capital;

the rate and degree of market acceptancepotential of our product candidates;

regulatorytechnologies and political developments in the United States and foreign countries, including but not limitedour ability to the Russia-Ukraine conflict and associated sanctions;execute on our corporate strategy;

our ability to contract with third-party suppliers and manufacturers and their ability to perform adequately;

our reliance on third parties to manufacture and conduct preclinical studies and clinical trials of our current and future product candidates;

the success of competing therapies that are or may become available;

our ability to obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates and any related restrictions, limitations and/or warnings in the label of any approved product candidate;

existing regulations and regulatory developments in the United States and other jurisdictions;

the strength and breadth of our patent portfolio;

our ability to obtain and adequately protect intellectual property rights for our product candidates;

potential claims relating to our intellectual property;

our financial performance;

our ability to develop and maintain our corporate infrastructure, including our ability to design and maintain an effective system of internal controls;

our ability to remediate the existing material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting;

our ability to attract and retain key scientific, ormedical, commercial and management personnel;

the accuracy of our estimates regarding expenses, future revenue, capital requirements and needs for additional financing;
the impact of laws and regulations; and
our expectations regarding

our ability to obtaincontinue to satisfy the listing requirements of The Nasdaq Stock Market and maintain intellectual property protection for any biopharmaceutical product candidates.

have our stock continue to trade thereon; and

the effects of macroeconomic and geopolitical conditions and unforeseeable events, such as the war in Ukraine and hostilities in the Middle East, potential bank failures and the COVID-19 pandemic.

These factors should not be construed as exhaustive and should be read in conjunction with the other cautionary statements that are included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. TheWe have based these forward-looking statements containedlargely on our current expectations and projections about our business, the industry in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qwhich we operate and financial trends that we believe may affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects and these forward-looking statements are madenot guarantees of future performance or development. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and we undertake no obligationsare subject to publicly updatea number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions described in the section titled “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Because forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which cannot be predicted or review any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise. Therefore,quantified, you should not rely on these forward-looking statements as representingpredictions of future events. The events and circumstances reflected in our viewsforward-looking statements may not be achieved or occur and actual results could differ materially from those projected in such statements. Except as required by applicable law, we do not plan to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements contained herein after we distribute this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, whether as a result of any date subsequentnew information, future events or otherwise.

ii


In addition, “we believe” and similar statements reflect our beliefs and opinions on the relevant subject. These statements are based upon information available to us as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.10-Q, and while we believe such information forms a reasonable basis for such statements, such information may be limited or incomplete, and our statements should not be read to indicate that we have conducted an exhaustive inquiry into, or review of, all potentially available relevant information. These statements are inherently uncertain, and you are cautioned not to unduly rely upon them.

iii


PART I—I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

TALARIS THERAPEUTICS,

ITEM 1.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TOURMALINE BIO, INC.

BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

(unaudited)

 

June 30, 2023

 

 

December 31, 2022

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

18,351

 

 

$

13,670

 

Marketable securities

 

 

133,901

 

 

 

167,612

 

Prepaid and other current assets

 

 

3,955

 

 

 

4,331

 

Total current assets

 

 

156,207

 

 

 

185,613

 

Property and equipment, net

 

 

226

 

 

 

5,348

 

Assets held for sale

 

 

1,500

 

 

 

 

Right-of-use assets

 

 

827

 

 

 

2,643

 

Restricted cash

 

 

250

 

 

 

 

Other assets

 

 

111

 

 

 

111

 

Total assets

 

$

159,121

 

 

$

193,715

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

2,934

 

 

$

3,887

 

Accrued expenses

 

 

6,349

 

 

 

6,665

 

Lease liability, current

 

 

601

 

 

 

910

 

Other current liabilities

 

 

250

 

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

 

 

10,134

 

 

 

11,462

 

Share repurchase liability

 

 

119

 

 

 

208

 

Other liabilities

 

 

11

 

 

 

16

 

Lease liability, net of current

 

 

425

 

 

 

1,974

 

Total liabilities

 

 

10,689

 

 

 

13,660

 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 9)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 140,000,000 shares authorized and 42,550,502
   issued and outstanding and
10,000,000 non-voting shares authorized as of June 30,
   2023 and
140,000,000 shares authorized and 41,629,426 issued and outstanding
   and
10,000,000 non-voting shares authorized as of December 31, 2022

 

 

4

 

 

 

4

 

Additional paid-in-capital

 

 

350,618

 

 

 

345,513

 

Accumulated deficit

 

 

(201,976

)

 

 

(164,741

)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

 

(214

)

 

 

(721

)

Total stockholders’ equity

 

 

148,432

 

 

 

180,055

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

$

159,121

 

 

$

193,715

 

   
September 30, 2023
  
December 31, 2022
 
Assets
   
Current assets:
   
Cash and cash equivalents  $67,083  $13,670 
Marketable securities   79,941   167,612 
Prepaid and other current assets   4,023   4,331 
          
Total current assets   151,047   185,613 
Property and equipment, net   —    5,348 
Assets held for sale   14   —  
Right-of-use
assets
   —    2,643 
Other assets   —    111 
          
Total assets  $151,061  $193,715 
          
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
         
Current liabilities:         
Accounts payable  $136  $3,887 
Accrued expenses   7,288   6,665 
Lease liability, current   634   910 
Other current liabilities   47   —  
          
Total current liabilities   8,105   11,462 
Share repurchase liability   82   208 
Other liabilities   —    16 
Lease liability, net of current   —    1,974 
          
Total liabilities   8,187   13,660 
          
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9)       
Stockholders’ equity         
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 140,000,000 shares authorized and 4,282,848 issued and outstanding and 10,000,000
non-voting
shares authorized as of September 30, 2023 and 140,000,000 shares authorized and 4,162,942 issued and outstanding and 10,000,000
non-voting
shares authorized as of December 31, 2022
   —    —  
Additional
paid-in-capital
   351,980   345,517 
Accumulated deficit   (208,991  (164,741
Accumulated other comprehensive loss   (115  (721
          
Total stockholders’ equity   142,874   180,055 
          
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity  $151,061  $193,715 
          
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

1

F-1

TALARIS THERAPEUTICS,

TOURMALINE BIO, INC.

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

(unaudited)

 

Three months ended June 30,

 

 

Six months ended June 30,

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

Operating expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Research and development

 

$

4,088

 

 

$

13,187

 

 

$

17,503

 

 

$

27,383

 

General and administrative

 

 

6,026

 

 

 

5,228

 

 

 

12,208

 

 

 

9,446

 

Restructuring costs

 

 

6,388

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,869

 

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

 

 

16,502

 

 

 

18,415

 

 

 

40,580

 

 

 

36,829

 

Loss from operations

 

 

(16,502

)

 

 

(18,415

)

 

 

(40,580

)

 

 

(36,829

)

Interest and other income (expense), net

 

 

1,764

 

 

 

319

 

 

 

3,345

 

 

 

474

 

Net loss

 

$

(14,738

)

 

$

(18,096

)

 

$

(37,235

)

 

$

(36,355

)

Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities

 

 

85

 

 

 

(217

)

 

 

507

 

 

 

(1,065

)

Total comprehensive loss

 

$

(14,653

)

 

$

(18,313

)

 

$

(36,728

)

 

$

(37,420

)

Net loss

 

$

(14,738

)

 

$

(18,096

)

 

$

(37,235

)

 

$

(36,355

)

Net loss per common share, basic and diluted

 

 

(0.35

)

 

 

(0.44

)

 

 

(0.89

)

 

 

(0.89

)

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding used in computation
   of net loss per common share, basic and diluted

 

 

42,171,841

 

 

 

41,088,085

 

 

 

41,985,372

 

 

 

41,034,447

 

   
Three months ended September 30,
  
Nine months ended September 30,
 
   
2023
  
2022
  
2023
  
2022
 
Operating expenses                 
Research and development  $267  $14,981  $17,770  $42,364 
General and administrative   9,114   4,842   21,322   14,288 
Restructuring costs   89   —    10,958   —  
                  
Total operating expenses   9,470   19,823   50,050   56,652 
Gain on asset sales   538   —    538   —  
                  
Loss from operations   (8,932  (19,823  (49,512  (56,652
Interest and other income (expense), net   1,917   812   5,262   1,286 
                  
Net loss  $(7,015 $(19,011 $(44,250 $(55,366
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities   99   (79  606   (1,144
                  
Total comprehensive loss  $(6,916 $(19,090 $(43,644 $(56,510
                  
Net loss  $(7,015 $(19,011 $(44,250 $(55,366
                  
Net loss per common share, basic and diluted   (1.64  (4.59  (10.48  (13.45
                  
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding used in computation of net loss per common share, basic and diluted   4,271,920   4,137,553   4,221,205   4,114,939 
                  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

2

F-2

TALARIS THERAPEUTICS,

TOURMALINE BIO, INC.

STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(in thousands, except share amounts)

(unaudited)

 

Common Stock

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated
Other

 

 

Total

 

 

Outstanding
Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Paid-in
Capital

 

 

Accumulated
Deficit

 

 

Comprehensive
Income (Loss)

 

 

Stockholders’
Equity (Deficit)

 

Balance at December 31, 2021

 

 

40,913,049

 

 

$

4

 

 

$

333,730

 

 

$

(90,847

)

 

$

(78

)

 

 

242,809

 

Issuance of common stock upon
   exercise of stock options

 

 

110,819

 

 

 

 

 

 

131

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

131

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,197

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,197

 

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(18,259

)

 

 

 

 

 

(18,259

)

Unrealized gain on marketable
   securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(848

)

 

 

(848

)

Balance at March 31, 2022

 

 

41,023,868

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

336,058

 

 

 

(109,106

)

 

 

(926

)

 

 

226,030

 

Issuance of common stock upon
   exercise of stock options

 

 

101,851

 

 

 

 

 

 

102

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

102

 

Issuance of common stock under
   2021 employee stock purchase
   plan

 

 

20,162

 

 

 

 

 

 

77

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

77

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,846

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,846

 

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(18,096

)

 

 

 

 

 

(18,096

)

Unrealized gain on marketable
   securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(217

)

 

 

(217

)

Balance at June 30, 2022

 

 

41,145,881

 

 

$

4

 

 

$

339,083

 

 

$

(127,202

)

 

$

(1,143

)

 

$

210,742

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2022

 

 

41,629,426

 

 

$

4

 

 

$

345,513

 

 

$

(164,741

)

 

$

(721

)

 

$

180,055

 

Issuance of common stock upon
   exercise of stock options

 

 

87,781

 

 

 

 

 

 

92

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

92

 

Vesting of restricted stock units

 

 

192,832

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,659

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,659

 

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(22,497

)

 

 

 

 

 

(22,497

)

Unrealized loss on marketable
   securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

422

 

 

 

422

 

Balance at March 31, 2023

 

 

41,910,039

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

349,264

 

 

 

(187,238

)

 

 

(299

)

 

 

161,731

 

Issuance of common stock upon
   exercise of stock options

 

 

179,752

 

 

 

 

 

 

177

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

177

 

Vesting of restricted stock units

 

 

457,489

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of common stock under
   2021 employee stock purchase
   plan

 

 

3,222

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,174

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,174

 

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(14,738

)

 

 

 

 

 

(14,738

)

Unrealized loss on marketable
   securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

85

 

 

 

85

 

Balance at June 30, 2023

 

 

42,550,502

 

 

$

4

 

 

$

350,618

 

 

$

(201,976

)

 

$

(214

)

 

$

148,432

 

   
Common Stock
   
Additional
      
Accumulated
Other
  
Total
 
   
Outstanding
Shares
   
Amount
   
Paid-in

Capital
   
Accumulated
Deficit
  
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
  
Stockholders’
Equity (Deficit)
 
Balance at December 31, 2021
   4,091,304   $—    $333,734   $(90,847 $(78  242,809 
Issuance of common stock upon exercise
of stock options
   11,081    —     131    —    —    131 
Stock-based compensation expense
   —     —     2,197    —    —    2,197 
Net loss
   —     —     —     (18,259  —    (18,259
Unrealized gain on marketable securities
   —     —     —     —    (848  (848
                             
Balance at March 31, 2022
   4,102,385    —     336,062    (109,106  (926  226,030 
Issuance of common stock upon exercise
of stock options
   10,185    —     102    —    —    102 
Issuance of common stock under 2021 employee
stock purchase plan
   2,016    —     77    —    —    77 
Stock-based compensation expense
   —     —     2,846    —    —    2,846 
Net loss
   —     —     —     (18,096  —    (18,096
Unrealized gain on marketable securities
   —     —     —     —    (217  (217
                             
Balance at June 30, 2022
   4,114,586   $—    $339,087   $(127,202 $(1,143 $210,742 
                             
Issuance of common stock upon exercise
of stock options
   18,164    —     174    —    —    174 
Vesting of restricted stock units
   15,438    —     —     —    —    —  
Stock-based compensation expense
   —     —     3,041    —    —    3,041 
Net loss
   —     —     —     (19,011  —    (19,011
Unrealized gain on marketable
securities
   —     —     —     —    (79  (79
                             
Balance at September 30, 2022
   4,148,188   $—    $342,302   $(146,213 $(1,222 $194,867 
                             
Balance at December 31, 2022
   4,162,942   $—    $345,517   $(164,741 $(721 $180,055 
Issuance of common stock upon exercise
of stock options
   8,778    —     92    —    —    92 
Vesting of restricted stock units
   19,283    —          —    —    —  
Stock-based compensation expense
   —     —     3,659    —    —    3,659 
Net loss
   —     —     —     (22,497  —    (22,497
Unrealized loss on marketable
securities
   —     —     —     —    422   422 
                             
Balance at March 31, 2023
   4,191,003    —     349,268    (187,238  (299  161,731 
Issuance of common stock upon exercise
of stock options
   17,975    —     177    —    —    177 
Vesting of restricted stock units
   45,748    —     —     —    —    —  
Issuance of common stock under 2021 employee
stock purchase plan
   322    —     3    —    —    3 
Stock-based compensation expense
   —     —     1,174    —    —    1,174 
Net loss
   —     —     —     (14,738  —    (14,738
Unrealized loss on marketable
securities
   —     —     —     —    85   85 
                             
Balance at June 30, 2023
   4,255,048    —     350,622    (201,976  (214  148,432 
Issuance of common stock upon exercise
of stock options
   10,985    —     111    —    —    111 
Vesting of restricted stock units
   11,531    —     —     —    —    —  
Stock-based compensation expense
   —     —     1,247    —    —    1,247 
Net loss
   —     —     —     (7,015  —    (7,015
Unrealized loss on marketable
securities
   —     —     —     —    99   99 
                             
Balance at September 30, 2023
   4,277,564   $—    $351,980   $(208,991 $(115 $142,874 
                             
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

3

F-3

TALARIS THERAPEUTICS,

TOURMALINE BIO, INC.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

 

Six months ended June 30,

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

$

(37,235

)

 

$

(36,355

)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

472

 

 

 

655

 

Accretion and amortization of marketable securities, net

 

 

(2,652

)

 

 

(92

)

Amortization of right-of-use assets

 

 

428

 

 

 

384

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

4,833

 

 

 

5,043

 

Asset impairment

 

 

3,424

 

 

 

 

Loss on disposal of assets

 

 

129

 

 

 

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prepaid and other current assets

 

 

376

 

 

 

(2,382

)

Other assets

 

 

 

 

 

(7

)

Accounts payable

 

 

(827

)

 

 

(84

)

Accrued expenses

 

 

(305

)

 

 

(553

)

Other current liabilities

 

 

250

 

 

 

 

Operating lease liability

 

 

(469

)

 

 

(262

)

Other liabilities

 

 

(5

)

 

 

93

 

Net cash used in operating activities

 

 

(31,581

)

 

 

(33,560

)

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases of property and equipment

 

 

(541

)

 

 

(2,433

)

Purchases of marketable securities

 

 

(74,630

)

 

 

(87,983

)

Maturities of marketable securities

 

 

111,500

 

 

 

130,771

 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

 

 

36,329

 

 

 

40,355

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

 

 

185

 

 

 

32

 

Payment for repurchase of forfeited restricted stock

 

 

(5

)

 

 

 

Proceeds from issuance of common stock under 2021 employee stock purchase plan

 

 

3

 

 

 

77

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

 

183

 

 

 

109

 

Net increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

 

 

4,931

 

 

 

6,904

 

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period

 

 

13,670

 

 

 

18,614

 

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period

 

$

18,601

 

 

$

25,518

 

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property and equipment additions included in accounts payable and
   accrued expenses

 

$

9

 

 

$

174

 

Decrease in right-of-use asset and operating lease liabilities due to remeasurement

 

$

1,388

 

 

$

 

Reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash reported within the balance sheet:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

 

$

18,351

 

 

$

25,518

 

Restricted cash

 

 

250

 

 

 

 

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period

 

$

18,601

 

 

$

25,518

 

   
Nine months ended September 30,
 
   
2023
  
2022
 
Cash flows from operating activities:
   
Net loss
  $(44,250 $(55,366
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
         
Depreciation and amortization
   494   1,029 
Accretion and amortization of marketable securities, net
   (3,872  (621
Amortization of
right-of-use
assets
   644   580 
Stock-based compensation expense
   6,081   8,084 
Asset impairment
   3,614   235 
Right-of-use
asset impairment
   469   —  
Gain on asset sales
   (538  —  
Loss on disposal of assets
   129   —  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
         
Prepaid and other current assets
   1,658   (1,634
Other assets
   111   (7
Accounts payable
   (3,626  (215
Accrued expenses
   635   1,260 
Other current liabilities
   47   —  
Operating lease liability
   (682  (423
Other liabilities
   (16  91 
          
Net cash used in operating activities
   (39,102  (46,987
          
Cash flows from investing activities:
         
Purchases of property and equipment
   (541  (2,774
Proceeds from asset sales
   650   —  
Purchases of marketable securities
   (85,154  (140,588
Maturities of marketable securities
   177,303   190,021 
          
Net cash provided by investing activities
   92,258   46,659 
          
Cash flows from financing activities:
         
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
   259   105 
Payment for repurchase of forfeited restricted stock
   (5  —  
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under 2021 employee stock purchase plan
   3   77 
          
Net cash provided by financing activities
   257   182 
          
Net increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
   53,413   (146
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
   13,670   18,614 
          
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $67,083  $18,468 
          
Supplemental disclosure of
non-cash
investing and financing activities:
         
Property and equipment additions included in accounts payable and accrued expenses
  $—   $178 
Deferred issuance costs included in accounts payable and accrued expenses
  $—    $81 
Decrease in
right-of-use
asset and operating lease liabilities due to remeasurement
  $1,388  $—  
Decrease in
right-of-use
asset and operating lease liabilities due to termination
  $142  $—  
Proceeds for asset sales included in other current assets
  $1,350  $—  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

4

F-4

TALARIS THERAPEUTICS, INC

TOURMALINE BIO, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

1. Nature of Business and Liquidity

Talaris Therapeutics, Inc. (“Talaris” or the “Company”) iswas a cell therapy company that was previously focused on developing an innovative method of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (“allo-HSCT”) to transform the standard of care in solid organ transplantation, certain severe autoimmune diseases and certain severe blood, immune and metabolic disorders. Talaris’ lead product candidate was FCR001. On October 19, 2023, Talaris completed its previously announced merger transaction in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 22, 2023 (the “Merger Agreement”), called Facilitated Allo-HSCT Therapy.by and among Talaris, Tourmaline Sub, Inc. (formerly known as Tourmaline Bio, Inc., “Legacy Tourmaline”) and Terrain Merger Sub, Inc., a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Talaris (“Merger Sub”), pursuant to which Merger Sub merged with and into Legacy Tourmaline, with Legacy Tourmaline surviving as a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Talaris and the surviving corporation of the merger (the “Merger”). On October 19, 2023, in connection with and prior to the completion of the Merger, Talaris effected a
1-for-10
reverse stock split of its common stock (the “Reverse Stock Split”). Upon the completion of the Merger, Legacy Tourmaline changed its name from “Tourmaline Bio, Inc.” to “Tourmaline Sub, Inc.”, and Talaris changed its name from “Talaris Therapeutics, Inc.” to “Tourmaline Bio, Inc.” (the “Company”). The Merger and the Reverse Stock Split are further described
below in Note 15.
Subsequent Events
.
Following the completion of the Merger, the business conducted by the Company maintains corporate officesbecame primarily the business conducted by Legacy Tourmaline, which is a late-stage clinical biotechnology company developing transformative medicines that dramatically improve the lives of patients with life-altering immune diseases. The Company’s lead product candidate is TOUR006, a fully human monoclonal antibody that selectively binds to
interleukin-6,
a key proinflammatory cytokine involved in Boston, Massachusetts, a laboratorythe pathogenesis of many autoimmune and inflammatory disorders. Founded on September 17, 2021, the Company is headquartered in Houston, Texas and its cell processing facilityNew York City.
Prior to the Merger, in Louisville, Kentucky.

In February 2023, the CompanyTalaris announced the discontinuation of our its

FREEDOM-1
and
FREEDOM-2
clinical trials evaluating FCR001’s ability to induce durable tolerance in living donor kidney transplant recipients. This decision was primarily attributable to the pace of enrollment and the associated timeline to critical milestones. The CompanyTalaris also announced a restructuring plan that resulted in the reduction in its workforce by
33
% (the "Initial“Initial Reduction in Force"Force”). The Company also announced and a comprehensive review of strategic alternatives focused on maximizing shareholder value, including, but not limited to, a reverse merger and/or a divestiture of the Company'sits cell therapy chemistry, manufacturing and controls ("CMC"(“CMC”) capabilities.

In March 2023, pending the outcome of the Company'sits review of strategic alternatives, the CompanyTalaris voluntarily paused enrollment in the
FREEDOM-3
Phase 2 clinical trial evaluating FCR001'sFCR001’s ability to induce tolerance in diffuse systemic scleroderma, a severe autoimmune disease, while continuing to evaluate patients for potential future enrollment.

In April 2023, the Company’sTalaris’ Board of Directors approved, and the CompanyTalaris announced, a further reduction in force (the “April Reduction in Force”) that resulted in the termination of approximately
80 additional employees, or approximately 95
% of the Company’sits remaining workforce. The April Reduction in Force was substantially completed in the second quarter of 2023.

On

In June 22, 2023, following a comprehensive review of strategic alternatives, Talaris entered into the CompanyMerger Agreement with Legacy Tourmaline (see Note 15).
In July 2023, Talaris entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”)asset purchase agreement with Tourmaline Bio,ImmunoFree, Inc. (“Tourmaline”ImmunoFree”), pursuant to which it sold certain clinical data and intellectual property related to FCR001 for approximately $2.2 million, including a wholly-owned subsidiarycombination of cash consideration, reimbursement of certain expenses and assumption of all current and future clinical wind-down liabilities (see Note 5).
In September 2023, Talaris sold certain long-lived assets primarily used in its CMC operations (see Note 5).
F-5

On October 19, 2023, Talaris completed the Company will mergeMerger with and intoLegacy Tourmaline with Tourmaline survivingpursuant to the Merger Agreement as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Merger”)described in Note 15.
Subsequent
Events
. The Reverse Stock Split has been retroactively applied to the accompanying financial statements and notes to the financial statements (see Note 15). In connection with the Merger, a special dividend of $64.7 million was paid to eligible pre-Merger Talaris stockholders (see Note 15).
The financial information included in the accompanying interim financial statements is that of Talaris prior to the Merger because the Merger was unanimously approvedconsummated after the period covered by Company’s board of directors, andthese financial statements. Unless the Company’s board of directors resolvedcontext indicates otherwise, the term “Company” as used hereinafter refers to recommend approval of the Merger(i) Talaris Therapeutics, Inc., for periods prior to the Company’s stockholders. The closing of the Merger is subject to approval by the Company’s and Tourmaline’s stockholders, as well as other customary closing conditions. If the Merger is completed, the business of Tourmaline will continue as the business of the combined company (see Note 14).

The Company’s future operations are highly dependent on the successeffectiveness of the Merger, and there can be no assurances that(ii) Tourmaline Bio, Inc. (as a combined company) for periods following the Merger will be successfully consummated. In the event that the Company does not complete the Merger, the Company may explore strategic alternatives, including, without limitation, another strategic transaction and/or pursue dissolution and liquidationeffectiveness of the Company.

Initial Public Offering

The Company completed an initial public offering (“IPO”) on May 11, 2021 in which the Company issued and sold 8,825,000 shares of its common stock at a public offering price of $17.00 per share. The Company’s aggregate gross proceeds from the sale of shares in the IPO was $150.0 million before underwriting discounts and commissions and other expenses of approximately $12.9 million. Upon completion of the offering, the Company’s outstanding convertible preferred stock was automatically converted into shares of common stock and non-voting common stock. Following the IPO, there were no shares of preferred stock outstanding. Prior to the IPO, on April 30, 2021, the Company’s board of directors and shareholders approved a one-for-5.35 reverse share split of issued and outstanding common shares and incentive shares and a proportional adjustment to the existing conversion ratios for the Company’s convertible preferred stock.

Merger.

Liquidity and Going Concern

The accompanying interim financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. Management has evaluated whether there are conditions and events that raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued. Since its inception, the Company has incurred net losses and negative cash flows from operations. During the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2023 and the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company incurred a net loss of $37.2$44.3 million and $73.9$73.9 million, respectively, and used $31.6$39.1 million and $60.9$60.9 million in cash for

5


operations, respectively. In addition, as of JuneSeptember 30, 2023, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $202.0$209.0 

million. The Company expects to continue to generate operating losses and negative cash flows for the foreseeable future.

The Company currently expects theits post-merger cash, and cash equivalents, of $18.4 million and marketable securities of $133.9

218.2
 million as of June 30, 2023, will be sufficient to fund its operating expenses and capital requirements for more than twelve months from the date the financial statements are available to be issued. However, due to consideration of certain qualitative factors, including the discontinuation of all clinical trials, CMC operations and research activities, as well as workforce reduction of all but a few custodial employees, the Company has concluded there is substantial doubt regarding the ability to continue as a going concern for more than twelve months from the date that the financial statements are available to be issued. These financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

The Company does not currently expect to progress any product candidate through clinical trials or commercial approval and it does not currently expect to generate any revenue from product sales. The Company expects to continue to incur costs and expenditures in connection with the process of consummating the Merger. There can be no assurance, however, that the Company will be able to successfully consummate the Merger or any other strategic transaction. The process of evaluating and executing strategic options is very costly, time-consuming and complex and the Company has incurred, and may in the future incur, significant costs related to this process, such as legal, accounting and advisory fees and expenses and other related charges.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make judgments, assumptions, and estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of financial statements, and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. The most significant estimates relate to the determination of the fair value of stock option grants and estimates related to the amount of prepaid and accrued research and development expenses as of the balance sheet date. Management evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other factors, including the current economic environment, and makes adjustments when the facts and circumstances dictate. These estimates are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements; therefore, actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, cash and cash equivalents consisted primarily of checking and savings deposits, money market fund holdings, and commercial paper.

Marketable Securities

The Company classifies its marketable securities as
available-for-sale
securities, which are carried at their fair value based on the quoted market prices of the securities. Unrealized gains and losses are reported as accumulated other comprehensive loss, a separate component of stockholders’ deficit. Realized gains and losses on
available-for-sale
securities are included in net loss in the period earned or incurred.

F-6

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation expense is recognized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of each asset. Equipment and furniture and fixtures are depreciated over five or seven year lives. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the lease term or the five-year estimated useful life of the asset. Computer equipment and computer software are depreciated over three years.years. Upon retirement or sale, the cost of assets disposed of and the related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is included in loss from operations. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.

in
cu

6


rred.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company evaluates its long-lived assets, which consist primarily of property and equipment, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to the future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. The Company determined a triggering event had occurred as of JuneDuring the three and nine months ended September 30, 2023, indicating the carrying amountCompany recorded
non-cash
impairment charges of certain assets may not be recoverable.$0.2 million and $3.6 million, respectively. For additional disclosures regarding the $3.4
3.6
 million
non-cash
impairment charge and accompanying analysis, refer to Note 6.7. During the year three and nine months ended December 31,September 30, 2022, the Companycompany recorded a $0.2 million
non-cash
impairment charge.

charges of
$0.2
 million.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentration of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents. The Company’s investment policy includes guidelines regarding the quality of the financial institutions and financial instruments and defines allowable investments that it believes minimizes the exposure to concentration of credit risk. The Company may invest in money market funds (minimum of $1$1 billion in assets), U.S. Treasury securities, corporate debt, bank debt, U.S. government-related agency securities, other sovereign debt, municipal debt and commercial paper. These deposits may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses historically in these accounts and believes that it is not exposed to significant credit risk as its deposits are held at financial institutions that management believes to be of high credit quality.


On March 10, 2023, Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”) was closed by the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) was appointed as receiver. On March 27, 2023, SVB was acquired by First-Citizen BancShares, Inc ("First-Citizen"(“First-Citizen”). Similarly, on May 1, 2023, First Republic Bank (“FRB”) was closed by the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation and the FDIC was appointed as receiver. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association (N.A.) acquired all of FRB’s deposit accounts and substantially all of its assets. The Company historically did not and currently does not have banking relationships with SVB or FRB.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair value is defined as the price that the Company would receive to sell an investment in a timely transaction or pay to transfer a liability in a timely transaction with an independent buyer in the principal market, or in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the investment or liability. A framework is used for measuring fair value utilizing a three-tier hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 investments) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 investments).

The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

Level
 1 inputs:
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;
Level
 2 inputs:
Quoted prices in markets that are not considered to be active or financial instrument valuations for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly; and
F-7

Level
 3 inputs:inputs
: Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.

Financial instruments are categorized in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and considers factors specific to the investment.

The Company’s money market funds and marketable securities are carried at fair value determined according to the fair value hierarchy described above (Level 1 and Level 2, respectively).

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses include (i) employee-related expenses, including salaries, benefits, travel and stock-based compensation expense; (ii) external research and development expenses incurred under arrangements with third parties, such as contract research organization agreements, investigational sites, and consultants; (iii) the cost of acquiring, developing, and manufacturing

7


clinical study materials; (iv) costs associated with preclinical and clinical activities and regulatory operations; (v) costs incurred in development of intellectual property; and (vi) an allocated portion of facilities and other infrastructure costs associated with our research and development activities. Costs incurred in connection with research and development activities are expensed as incurred.

The Company enters into consulting, research, and other agreements with commercial entities, researchers, universities, and others for the provision of goods and services. Such arrangements are generally cancelable upon reasonable notice and payment of costs incurred. Costs are considered incurred based on an evaluation of the progress to completion of specific tasks under each contract using information and data provided by the respective vendors, including the Company’s clinical sites. These costs consist of direct and indirect costs associated with specific projects, as well as fees paid to various entities that perform certain research on behalf of the Company. Depending upon the timing of payments to the service providers, the Company recognizes prepaid expenses or accrued expenses related to these costs. These accrued or prepaid expenses are based on management’s estimates of the work performed under service agreements, milestones achieved, and experience with similar contracts. The Company monitors each of these factors and adjusts estimates accordingly.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company measures all stock options and other stock-based awards granted to employees, nonemployees, and directors based on the fair value on the date of the grant and recognizes stock-based compensation expense of those awards over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period of the respective award. Generally, the Company issues stock option, restricted stock unit, and stock appreciation right awards with only service-based vesting conditions and records the expense for these awards using the straight-line method. The Company’s policy is to account for forfeitures when they occur.


The Company classifies stock-based compensation expense in its statement of operations in the same manner in which the award recipient’s payroll costs are classified or in which the award recipients’ service payments are classified.

The fair value of each stock option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Company recently completed its IPO and lacks company-specific historical and implied volatility information. Therefore, it estimates its expected stock volatility based on the historical volatility of a publicly traded set of peer companies and expects to continue to do so until it has adequate historical data regarding the volatility of its own traded stock price. The expected term of the Company’s stock options has been determined utilizing the “simplified” method for awards that qualify as “plain-vanilla” options. The expected term of stock options granted to
non-employees
is equal to the contractual term of the option award. The risk-free interest rate is determined by reference to the US Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant of the award for time periods approximately equal to the expected term of the award. Expected dividend yield is zero because
the Company has never paid cash dividends on common stock and doesdid not expect to pay any cash dividends inprior to completion of the foreseeable future.

Merger.

F-8

Prior to the Company’s IPO, the Company considered the estimated fair value of the common stock as of the measurement date in determining the exercise price for options granted. The estimated fair value of the common stock was determined at each grant date based upon a variety of factors, including the illiquid nature of the common stock,
arm’s-length
sales of the Company’s capital stock (including convertible preferred stock), the effect of the rights and preferences of the preferred shareholders, and the prospects of a liquidity event. Among other factors are the Company’s financial position and historical financial performance, forecasted future operations of the Company, an evaluation or benchmark of the Company’s competition, and the current business climate in the marketplace. Significant changes to the key assumptions underlying the factors used could result in different fair values of common stock at each valuation date. The fair value for options granted since the Company’s IPO are based on the closing stock price on grant date.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or in the Company’s tax returns. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined on the basis of the differences between the financial statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded in the provision for income taxes. The Company assesses the likelihood that its deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and, to the extent it believes, based upon the weight of available evidence, that it is more likely than not that all or a portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, a valuation allowance is established through a charge to income tax expense. Potential for recovery of deferred tax assets is evaluated by estimating the future taxable profits expected and considering prudent and feasible tax planning strategies.

The Company accounts for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements by applying a
two-step
process to determine the amount of tax benefit to be recognized. First, the tax position must be evaluated to determine the likelihood that it will be sustained upon external examination by the taxing authorities. If the tax position is deemed more likely than not to be sustained, the tax

8


position is then assessed to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the financial statements. The amount of the benefit that may be recognized is the largest amount that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The provision for income taxes includes the effects of any resulting tax reserves, or unrecognized tax benefits, that are considered appropriate as well as the related net interest and penalties.

The Company provides reserves for potential payments of tax to various tax authorities related to uncertain tax positions. These reserves are based on a determination of whether and how much of a tax benefit taken by the Company in its tax filings or positions is more likely than not to be realized following resolution of any potential contingencies present related to the tax benefit. Potential interest and penalties associated with such uncertain tax positions are recorded as a component of income tax expense. The Company had no significant uncertain tax positions as of JuneSeptember 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022.

Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Share

The Company calculates basic and diluted net loss per share using the
two-class
method. The
two-class
method requires income available to common stock as if all income for the period had been distributed. Accordingly, basic net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, without consideration of potential dilutive securities. Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period plus the dilutive effects of potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the period. Potentially dilutive securities include vested and unexercised stock options, restricted stock issued upon early exercise of stock options, convertible preferred shares and contingent stock liabilities. The dilutive effect of stock options and contingent stock liabilities are computed using the treasury stock method and the dilutive effect of convertible preferred shares is calculated using the
if-converted
method. The Company has generated a net loss for all periods presented, therefore diluted net loss per share is the same as basic net loss per share since the inclusion of potentially dilutive securities would be anti-dilutive.

F-9

Segments

Operating segments are defined as components of an entity for which separate financial information is made available and is regularly evaluated by the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) in making decisions regarding resource allocation and assessing performance. The Company’s CODM is the chief executive officer and operations are managed as a single segment for the purposes of assessing performance and making operating decisions.

Comprehensive Loss

Comprehensive loss represents net loss for the period plus the results of certain other changes in stockholders’ equity. The Company’s comprehensive loss included unrealized gains related to marketable securities for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2023 and 2022.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU
No. 2016-02,
Leases (Topic 842), and subsequently has issued additional guidance (collectively, “ASC 842”), which requires companies to generally recognize operating and financing lease liabilities and corresponding
right-of-use
assets on the balance sheet. The Company adopted ASC 842 on January 1, 2022 using the modified retrospective approach, with no restatement of prior periods. Upon adoption, the Company elected the package of transitional practical expedients which allowed the Company to carry forward prior conclusions related to whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, the lease classification for any expired or existing leases and initial direct costs for existing leases. In addition, the Company made an accounting policy election to not apply the recognition requirements in the leasing standards to short-term leases, which is a lease that at commencement date has a lease term of 12 months or less and does not contain a purchase option that it is reasonably certain to exercise.

As a result of the adoption of the new leasing standards, on January 1, 2022, the Company recorded
right-of-use
assets of $3.4$3.4 million and operating lease liabilities of $3.5$3.5 
million. The adoption did not have a material impact on the statement of operations or the statement of cash flows. For additional information on the adoption of the new leasing standard, refer to Note 8.

9


3. Fair Value of Financial Assets

The following table presents information about the Company’s financial instruments that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the inputs the Company utilized to determine such fair value

(in thousands):

 

June 30, 2023

 

 

Total

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

Financial assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Money market funds (cash equivalents)

 

$

17,851

 

 

$

17,851

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Marketable securities

 

 

133,901

 

 

 

7,754

 

 

 

126,147

 

 

 

 

Total financial assets measured at fair value

 

$

151,752

 

 

$

25,605

 

 

$

126,147

 

 

$

 

 

December 31, 2022

 

 

Total

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

Financial assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Money market funds (cash equivalents)

 

$

12,309

 

 

$

12,309

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Marketable securities

 

 

167,612

 

 

 

31,718

 

 

 

135,894

 

 

 

 

Total financial assets measured at fair value

 

$

179,921

 

 

$

44,027

 

 

$

135,894

 

 

$

 

:

   
September 30, 2023
 
   
Total
   
Level 1
   
Level 2
   
Level 3
 
Financial assets:
                    
Money market funds (cash equivalents)  $66,719   $66,719   $—    $—  
Marketable securities   79,941    7,826    72,115    —  
                     
Total financial assets measured at fair value  $146,660   $74,545   $72,115   $—  
                     
   
December 31, 2022
 
   
Total
   
Level 1
   
Level 2
   
Level 3
 
Financial assets:
                    
Money market funds (cash equivalents)  $12,309   $12,309   $—    $—  
Marketable securities   167,612    31,718    135,894    —  
                     
Total financial assets measured at fair value  $179,921   $44,027   $135,894   $—  
                     
F-10

4. Marketable Securities

The fair value of the Company’s marketable securities as of JuneSeptember 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 is based on level 1 and level 2 inputs. The Company’s investments consist mainly of U.S. government and agency securities, government-sponsored bond obligations and certain other corporate debt securities. Fair value is determined by taking into consideration valuations obtained from third-party pricing services. The third-party pricing services utilize industry standard valuation models, for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly, to estimate fair value. These inputs include reported trades of and broker/dealer quotes on the same or similar securities; issuer credit spreads; benchmark securities; and other observable inputs. There were no transfers between levels within the hierarchy during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2023 and the year ended December 31, 2022. The Company has assessed U.S. government treasuries as level 1 and all other marketable securities as level 2 within the fair value hierarchy of ASC 820. The Company classifies its entire investment portfolio as
available-for-sale
as defined in ASC 320, Debt Securities.Securities. Securities are carried at fair value with the unrealized gains (losses) reported in other comprehensive loss.

As of JuneSeptember 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, none of the Company’s investments were determined to be other than temporarily impaired.

The following table summarizes the Company’s investments

(in thousands)
:

 

June 30, 2023

 

 

Amortized
Cost

 

 

Unrealized
Gain

 

 

Unrealized
(Loss)

 

 

Estimated
Fair Value

 

Commercial paper

 

$

87,847

 

 

$

6

 

 

$

(125

)

 

$

87,728

 

Government and agency securities

 

 

46,268

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

(109

)

 

 

46,173

 

Total

 

$

134,115

 

 

$

20

 

 

$

(234

)

 

$

133,901

 

 

December 31, 2022

 

 

Amortized
Cost

 

 

Unrealized
Gain

 

 

Unrealized
(Loss)

 

 

Estimated
Fair Value

 

Commercial paper

 

$

119,313

 

 

$

19

 

 

$

(365

)

 

$

118,967

 

Corporate debt securities

 

 

43,016

 

 

 

 

 

 

(368

)

 

 

42,648

 

Government and agency securities

 

 

6,004

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7

)

 

 

5,997

 

Total

 

$

168,333

 

 

$

19

 

 

$

(740

)

 

$

167,612

 

   
September 30, 2023
 
   
Amortized
Cost
   
Unrealized
Gain
   
Unrealized
(Loss)
   
Estimated
Fair Value
 
Commercial paper  $35,371   $1   $(54  $35,318 
Government and agency securities   44,685    3    (65   44,623 
                     
Total  $80,056   $4   $(119  $79,941 
                     
   
December 31, 2022
 
   
Amortized
Cost
   
Unrealized
Gain
   
Unrealized
(Loss)
   
Estimated
Fair Value
 
Commercial paper  $119,313   $19   $(365  $118,967 
Government and agency securities   43,016    —     (368   42,648 
Corporate debt securities   6,004    —     (7   5,997 
                     
Total  $168,333   $19   $(740  $167,612 
                     
The aggregate fair value of
available-for-sale
securities in an unrealized loss position as of JuneSeptember 30, 2023 was $90.3$61.1 million. The Company has reviewed its portfolio of
available-for-sale
debt securities and determined that the decline in fair value below cost did not result from credit-loss related factors. As such,
no allowance for credit losses
was
recorded as of JuneSeptember 30, 2023.

10

5. Asset Sales
On July 7, 2023, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement with ImmunoFree, Inc. (the “ImmunoFree APA”), effective July 1, 2023. Pursuant to the terms of the ImmunoFree APA, the Company sold certain clinical data and intellectual property related
to
FCR001 for cash consideration of $
0.5 million, reimbursement of $0.2 million for certain expenses and assumption of all current and future clinical wind-down liabilities. In connection with this agreement, the Company relinquished its rights under the ULRF License Agreement in order to allow ImmunoFree to license such rights to FCR001 from ULRF (see Note 10).
The Company recorded a gain on sale of asset of $0.5 million in the accompanying statement of operations and comprehensive loss.
On September 29, 2023, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement with New York Blood Center, Inc. (“NYBC”) (the “NYBC APA”). Pursuant to the terms of the NYBC APA, the Company sold its long-lived assets primarily used in its CMC operations for cash consideration of $1.5 million and assumption of the Company’s lease obligations related to its laboratory space in Louisville, Kentucky and Houston, Texas (see Note 7).
F-11

6. Prepaid and Other Current Assets

Prepaid and other current assets consisted of the following

(in thousands):

 

June 30,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

Prepaid insurance

 

$

1,672

 

 

$

1,037

 

Prepaid research and development expenses

 

 

955

 

 

 

2,426

 

Other current assets

 

 

1,328

 

 

 

868

 

Total prepaid and other current assets

 

$

3,955

 

 

$

4,331

 

:

6.

   
September 30,
   
December 31,
 
   
2023
   
2022
 
Prepaid insurance  $1,179   $1,037 
Prepaid research and development expenses   —     2,426 
Receivable from asset sale   1,350    —  
Other current assets   1,494    868 
           
Total prepaid and other current assets  $4,023   $4,331 
           
7. Property and Equipment, Net and Assets Held for Sale

Property and equipment, net consisted of the following

(in thousands)
:

 

June 30,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

Equipment

 

$

 

 

$

6,562

 

Leasehold improvements

 

 

31

 

 

 

1,191

 

Computer equipment

 

 

335

 

 

 

859

 

Furniture and fixtures

 

 

262

 

 

 

674

 

Construction in progress

 

 

 

 

 

242

 

Total property and equipment

 

 

628

 

 

 

9,528

 

Less accumulated depreciation

 

 

(402

)

 

 

(4,180

)

Property and equipment, net

 

$

226

 

 

$

5,348

 


   
September 30,
   
December 31,
 
   
2023
   
2022
 
Equipment  $—    $6,562 
Leasehold improvements   —     1,191 
Computer equipment   —     859 
Furniture and fixtures   —     674 
Construction in progress   —     242 
           
Total property and equipment   
    9,528 
Less accumulated depreciation   
    (4,180
           
Property and equipment, net  $
   $5,348 
           
Depreciation expense was $0.1 millionimmaterial and $
0.5 million for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2023, respectively, and $0.4$0.4 and $0.7$1.0 million for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2022, respectively.

The Company reviewed the cumulative impact of its announcements in February, March and April of 2023 to discontinue its
FREEDOM-1
and
FREEDOM-2
clinical trials and initiate a reduction in force of 33%33% of its employees, pause enrollment in its
FREEDOM-3
clinical trial and initiate a second reduction in force of
95%95% of its remaining employees, respectively, on the carrying value of certain of its long-lived assets. The analysis resulted in the Company determining a triggering event had occurred in relation to the long-lived assets used primarily in the Company'sCompany’s CMC operations with a net book value of $4.7 million. The net book value of these assets consisted of $3.9 million of equipment, $0.5 million of leasehold improvements and $0.3 million of furniture and fixtures. The Company obtained third-party quotes to assess the current fair value of these assets and determine if an impairment had occurred. The value determined from these quotes was $2.0$2.0 million, resulting in the Company recording a
non-cash
impairment expense of $
2.7$2.7 million for the assets, during the period ended March 31, 2023. The impairment amount was allocated $2.2 million to equipment, $0.3 million to leasehold improvements and $0.2 million to furniture and fixtures.

In April 2023, the Company committed to a plan to sell it
s
long-lived assets used primarily in its CMC operations and therefore classified such assets as assets held for sale on the accompanying balance sheet as of June 30, 2023.operations. The assets held for sale were reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value, less costs to sell. In May 2023, the Company evaluated the fair value, less costs to sell, of its assets held for sale in connection with a potential sale and determined that an impairment had occurred. The Company recorded a
non-cash
impairment expense of $0.5 million.$0.5 million, during the period ended June 30, 2023. The Company received a cash deposit of $0.3 million in connection withcompleted the potential sale of its long-lived assets held for sale, which is recorded as restricted cash and other current liabilities on the accompanying balance sheet as of June 30, 2023.

used primarily in its CMC operations in September 2023 (see Note 5).

In June 2023, the Company reviewed the impact of its asset purchase agreement withthe ImmunoFree Inc. ("ImmunoFree")APA on the carrying value of certain long-lived assets (see Note 15)5). The analysis resulted in the Company determining a triggering event had occurred in relation to computer equipment with a net book value of $0.2 million.equipment. The Company determined the assets had no carrying value and recorded a
non-cash
impairment charge of $
0.2 million.

$0.2 million, during the period ended June 30, 2023.

7.

In September 2023, the Company committed to a plan to sell its remaining long-lived assets of primarily office furniture and computer equipment and therefore classified such assets as held for sale on the accompanying balance sheet as of September 30, 2023 (see Note 15). The assets held for sale were reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value, less costs to sell. The Company obtained third-party quotes to assess the current fair value of these assets and determine if an impairment had occurred. The value determined from these quotes was immaterial, resulting in the Company recording a
non-cash
impairment expense
of $0.2 million for the assets during the period ended September 30, 2023.
F-12

8. Restructuring Costs

In February 2023, after a review of the Company’s business, programs, resources and capabilities, including anticipated costs and timelines, the Company announced the decision to discontinue its
FREEDOM-1
and
FREEDOM-2
clinical trials and to conduct a comprehensive review of strategic alternatives.

The Company announced a restructuring plan that resulted in the Initial Reduction in Force and the April Reduction in Force, which were substantially completed as of JuneSeptember 30, 2023. During the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2023, the Company recorded restructuring costs of $5.7$0.1 million and $7.4$7.5 million, respectively, related to severance, employee termination, and retention costs.

11


Restructuring costs also included impairment expense of $0.7 millionzero and $3.4$3.4 million for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2023, respectively (see Note 6)7).

The Company'sCompany’s restructuring liability, which is included in accrued compensation and benefit costs (see Note 8)9), consisted of the following

(in thousands):

 

Employee-Related Costs

 

 

Three months ended
June 30, 2023

 

 

Six months ended
June 30, 2023

 

Accrued restructuring balance at beginning of period

 

$

1,327

 

 

$

 

Expenses incurred

 

 

5,677

 

 

 

7,446

 

Payments

 

 

(3,742

)

 

 

(4,184

)

Accrued restructuring balance at June 30, 2023

 

$

3,262

 

 

$

3,262

 

8.:


   
Employee-Related Costs
 
   
Three months ended
September 30, 2023
   
Nine months ended
September 30, 2023
 
Accrued restructuring balance at beginning of period  $3,262   $—  
Expenses incurred   89    7,535 
Payments   (1,993   (6,177
           
Accrued restructuring balance at September 30, 2023  $1,358   $1,358 
           
9. Accrued Expenses

Accrued expenses consisted of the following

(in thousands):

 

June 30,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

Compensation and benefit costs

 

$

3,376

 

 

$

3,566

 

Research and development expenses

 

 

1,474

 

 

 

1,978

 

Professional fees, consulting and other

 

 

1,499

 

 

 

1,121

 

Total accrued expenses

 

$

6,349

 

 

$

6,665

 

9.:


   
September 30,
   
December 31,
 
   
2023
   
2022
 
Compensation and benefit costs  $1,498   $3,566 
Research and development expenses   418    1,978 
Legal settlement   4,000    —  
Professional fees, consulting and other   1,372    1,121 
           
Total accrued expenses  $7,288   $6,665 
           
10. Commitments and Contingencies

Leases

The Company currently has fourhad one active lease agreementsagreement for office and laboratory space and related equipment.as of September 30, 2023. The Company'sCompany’s former cell processing facility lease iswas located on the University of Louisville campus in Louisville, Kentucky (the “Louisville Lease”). This lease hashad a termination date in November 2023, with an option to extend for three additional
one-year
renewals at the Company’s discretion. In May 2020, the Company added additional office and laboratory space to the Louisville Lease. In March 2023, the Company entered into an amended lease agreement for the Louisville Lease that increased the successive
one-year
renewal terms from three to five and reduces the written notice period for the successive
one-year
renewals from six months in advance to three months in advance.

The Company reviewed the cumulative impact of its announcements in February, March and April of 2023 to discontinue its FREEDOM-1 and FREEDOM-2 clinical trials and initiate a reduction in force of 33% of its employees, pause enrollment in its FREEDOM-3 clinical trial and initiate a second reduction in force of 95% of its remaining employees, respectively, on its lease terms. Based on this analysis, the Company determined a triggering event had occurred and it iswas not reasonably certain to exercise its option to renew the Louisville Lease upon its original termination in November 2023. As a result of this determination, the Company remeasured the associated
right-of-use
asset and operating lease liability. The Company prospectively modified the estimated useful lives of the existing leasehold improvements, which are included as a component of property and equipment, net on the accompanying balance sheet.improvements. These assets were subject to the
non-cash
impairment disclosed in Note 67.
F-13

In September 2023, the Company, NYBC and landlord entered into an assignment, assumption, and amendment of lease and landlord consent agreement (“Louisville Lease Assignment Agreement”). Pursuant to the future depreciation expense is modified followingLouisville Lease Assignment Agreement, the impairment allocation.

Company assigned its rights and obligations under the Louisville Lease to NYBC effective September 29, 2023. The Company recorded a reduction to the associated

right-of-use
asset and operating lease liability. There was no impact to the accompanying statement of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2023.
In September 2021, the Company entered into a sublease agreement for separate office space in Louisville, Kentucky. This sublease hashad a termination date in November 2023.

In August 2023, the Company entered into an amended sublease agreement, effective August 1, 2023, to terminate the sublease for no cash consideration. The Company maintainsrecorded a reduction to the associated

right-of-use
asset and operating lease liability. There was no impact to the accompanying statement of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2023.
In July 2021, the Company entered into a lease agreement for laboratory space in Houston, Texas (the “Houston Lease”). The Houston Lease commenced in January 2022. The term of the lease was 36 months from the commencement date, terminating December 2024.
In
September 2023, the Company, NYBC and landlord entered into an assignment, assumption, and amendment of lease and landlord consent agreement (“Houston Lease Assignment Agreement”). Pursuant to the Houston Lease Assignment Agreement, the Company assigned its rights under the Houston Lease to NYBC effective September 29, 2023. The Company recorded a reduction to the associated
right-of-use
asset and operating lease liability. The Company recorded a minimal gain on disposal of the
right-of-use
asset as gain on asset sale in the accompanying statement of operations and comprehensive loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2023. Pursuant to the Houston Lease Assignment Agreement, the Company retained its obligations to the Houston Lease as a guarantor. The Company evaluated the conditions of its guarantee as of the balance sheet date and determine the fair value of the guarantee is
de-minimus.
The Company maintained a lease for office space in Wellesley, Massachusetts (the "Boston Lease"“Boston Lease”), as of September 30, 2023. The Boston Lease, that had an original termination date in March 2021.2021. In April 2021, the Company entered into an amended lease agreement providing for temporary space from April 2021 until an expansion of the Boston Lease was complete, from which the lease term extends 39 months from the expansion completion date. The expansion was completed in June 2022, resulting in the lease term extending to September 2025.

2025. In July 2021,October 2023, the Company entered into aan agreement to terminate the lease agreement for laboratory space in Houston, Texas (the “Houston Lease”)(see Note 15). The HoustonCompany determined a triggering event had occurred in relation to its Boston Lease commencedand recorded a

non-cash
impairment expense of $0.5 million related to its
right-of-use
asset during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2023, included in January 2022. The termgeneral and administrative expenses in the accompanying statements of the lease is 36 months from the commencement date, terminating December 2024.

12


operations and comprehensive loss.

The future minimum rent payments relating to all four of the Company’s ongoing facility operating leasesBoston Lease under the terms and conditions existing as of JuneSeptember 30, 2023, as well as amendmentswere
$0.6 
million for the year ending December 31, 2023. In October 2023, the Company paid $0.6 million in connection with its termination of the Boston Lease (see Note 15). Subsequent to the October payment on the Boston Lease, the Company has entered into between the date of these financial statements and the date they were available to be issued, are summarized as follows (in thousands):

Years Ending December 31,

 

 

 

2023

 

$

434

 

2024

 

 

411

 

2025

 

 

260

 

2026 and beyond

 

 

 

Total lease payments

 

$

1,105

 

Less: imputed interest

 

 

(79

)

Present value of lease liabilities

 

$

1,026

 

no remaining lease obligations.

The Company incurred rent expense of $0.2$0.2 million and $0.5$0.7 million for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2023, respectively, and $0.2$0.3 million and $0.5$0.8 million for three
and nine
months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2022, respectively.

The following table summarizes the operating lease term and discount rate as of June 30, 2023:

As of June 30, 2023

Weighted-average remaining lease term (years)

1.8

Weighted-average discount rate

6.8

%

Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of the Company'sCompany’s operating lease liability was $0.3$0.3 million and $0.5$0.5 million for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2023, respectively, and $0.2$0.2 million and $0.4$0.6 million for the three

and nine
months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2022, respectively.

F-14

License Agreement

In October 2018, the Company entered an amended and restated exclusive license agreement with ULRF related to certain licensed patent rights and
know-how
related to human facilitating cells for its Facilitated Allo-HSCTallo-HSCT Therapy approach. Pursuant to the ULRF License Agreement, ULRF granted the Company an exclusive, worldwide license under such patents and a nonexclusive royalty-bearing, worldwide license for such
know-how
to research, develop, commercialize and manufacture FCR001 and products containing FCR001 in all fields, without limitation. ULRF also granted the Company the right to grant sublicenses in accordance with the ULRF License Agreement. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company is obligated to compensate ULRF
three percent of net sales of all licensed products sold, one third of any
non-royalty
sublicensing income, and up to $
1.625$1.625 million in regulatory and sales milestones on each licensed product upon the occurrence of specific events as outlined in the license agreement; and annual license maintenance fees.

In addition, upon execution of the ULRF License Agreement, the Company granted contingent equity consideration equal to 65,186 shares of common stock to ULRF. Coincident with the completion of the Company’s IPO, the Company issued 48,889 shares of common stock to ULRF and provided a cash payment of approximately $0.3$0.3 million in lieu of issuing the remaining 16,297 shares of common stock.

The Company incurred $0.1$0.1 million in expense in January 2023 related to an annual maintenance fee pursuant to the ULRF License Agreement for the year endedend
ing
 December 31, 2023. The Company incurred $
0.1$0.1 million in expense in February 2022 related to an annual maintenance fee pursuant to the license agreement for the year ended December 31, 2022.

In connection with the transaction with ImmunoFree, the ULRF License Agreement relating to FCR001 was terminated, conditioned upon the license of Talaris'Talaris’ rights under the ULRF License Agreement to ImmunoFree.

Legal Proceedings

The Company is not currently a party to any material legal proceedings.

At each reporting date, the Company evaluates whether a potential loss amount or a potential range of loss is probable and reasonably estimable under the provisions of the authoritative guidance that addresses accounting for contingencies. The Company expenses the costs related to its legal proceedings as incurred.

The Company may be involved in litigation arising in the ordinary course of conducting business. The Company reviews all litigation on an ongoing basis when making accrual and disclosure decisions. The Company, in accordance with current accounting standards for loss contingencies and based upon information currently known by the Company, will establish reserves for litigation when it is probable that a loss associated with a claim or proceeding has been incurred and the amount of the loss or range of loss can be reasonably estimated. When no amount within the range of loss is a better estimate than any other amount, wethe Company will accrue the minimum amount of the estimable loss. To the extent that such litigation against the Company may have an exposure to a loss in excess of the

13


amount accrued, the Company believes that such excess would not be material to ourits financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

In September 2023, the Company received a purported notice of material breach from ImmunoFree (the “ImmunoFree Demand Letter”) alleging that the Company breached a provision of the ImmunoFree APA and that the Company fraudulently induced ImmunoFree to enter into the ImmunoFree APA. In the ImmunoFree Demand Letter, ImmunoFree alleged the Company failed to disclose certain information and costs related to a patient in the
FREEDOM-1
Study and demanded that the Company indemnify ImmunoFree for the cost of treatment for this patient. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2023, the Company recorded an expense of $
4.0
million related to the ImmunoFree Demand Letter (see Note 15). This expense is included in accrued expenses in the accompanying balance sheets (see Note 9) and general and administrative expenses in the accompanying statements of operations and comprehensive loss.
In addition, three individual lawsuits have been filed against Talaris and its directors related to the Merger: Wieder v. Talaris Therapeutics, Inc., et al., No. 1:23-cv-08355 (S.D.N.Y. filed Sept. 21, 2023), Carlisle v. Talaris Therapeutics, Inc., et al., No. 1:23-cv-08520 (S.D.N.Y. filed Sept. 27, 2023), and Roberts v. Talaris Therapeutics, Inc., et al., No. 1:23-cv-01063 (D. Del. filed Sept. 27, 2023) (collectively, the “Stockholder Litigation”). The complaints named Talaris and the Board of Directors of Talaris as defendants. Legacy Tourmaline and its officers and directors were not named as defendants in the complaints. The complaints asserted claims under Section 14(a) and Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Rule 14a-19 promulgated thereunder, and generally allege that the proxy statement filed by Talaris on July 20, 2023, and as amended on August 25, 2023 and September 11, 2023 (the “Proxy Statement”), misrepresents and/or omits certain purportedly material information relating to the Merger. The complaints sought a variety of equitable and injunctive relief including, among other things, an injunction enjoining the consummation of the Merger, rescission of the Merger if it is consummated, rescissory damages and costs and attorneys’ fees.
Between July 25 and September 20, 2023, six purported stockholders of Talaris sent demand letters regarding the Proxy Statement (the “Demand Letters”). Based on the same core allegations as the Stockholder Litigation, the Demand Letters requested that Talaris disseminate corrective disclosures in an amendment or supplement to the Proxy Statement.
On October 10, 2023, Talaris filed a Form 8-K to update and supplement the Proxy Statement with additional disclosures relating to the Merger (the “Supplemental Disclosures”). Thereafter, plaintiffs in the Stockholder Litigation voluntarily dismissed their complaints, and opposing counsel (for the stockholders in the Stockholder Litigation and Demand Letters) requested a mootness fee in connection with the Supplemental Disclosures. The ultimate outcome of any litigation is uncertain and unfavorable outcomes could have a negative impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition. Regardless of outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on the Company due to defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources, negative publicity and reputational harm, and other factors.
F-15

11. Common Stock

Common Stock

On April 30, 2021, the Company’s stockholders approved the third amended and restated certificate of incorporation of the Company, which included the authorization of 10,000,000 shares of undesignated preferred stock with a par value of $0.0001,$0.0001, authorization of 140,000,000 shares of voting common stock and 10,000,000 shares of
non-voting
common stock. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2023,
no undesignated preferred stock was outstanding.

Common Stock Reserved

The number of shares of common stock that have been reserved for outstanding stock-based awards granted and stock-based awards available for grant under the Company’s 2021 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “2021 Plan”) and the 2018 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2018 Plan”) and shares reserved for issuance under the Company’s 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “2021 ESPP”) are as follows:

 

June 30,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

Restricted stock related to early exercise of common stock options

 

 

82,505

 

 

 

158,154

 

Restricted stock units outstanding

 

 

720,157

 

 

 

1,144,994

 

Outstanding common stock options

 

 

5,728,727

 

 

 

6,264,898

 

Outstanding stock appreciation rights

 

 

1,000,000

 

 

 

 

Shares reserved for issuance under equity incentive plans

 

 

1,966,616

 

 

 

758,434

 

Shares reserved for issuance under the 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

 

 

1,581,097

 

 

 

1,166,444

 

Total

 

 

11,079,102

 

 

 

9,492,924

 

11.


   
September 30,
   
December 31,
 
   
2023
   
2022
 
Restricted stock related to early exercise of common stock options   5,281    15,815 
Restricted stock units outstanding   60,478    114,461 
Outstanding common stock options   533,900    626,373 
Outstanding stock appreciation rights   100,000    —  
Shares reserved for issuance under equity incentive plans   227,602    75,843 
Shares reserved for issuance under the 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan   158,109    116,644 
           
Total   1,085,370    949,136 
           
12. Stock-Based Compensation

2021
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan

On January 1, 2023, an additional 417,87541,787 shares were added to the 2021 ESPP, representing 1%1% of total common shares outstanding at December 31, 2022, pursuant to the terms of the plan. The expense incurred under this plan for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2023 and 2022 was immaterial to the financial statements. The amounts have been included in the total stock-based compensation line items in the accompanying financial statements and disclosures.

Equity Incentive Plans

On January 1, 2023 an additional 2,089,379208,937 shares were added to the 2021 Plan, representing 5%5% of total common shares outstanding at December 31, 2022, pursuant to the terms of the plan.

As of JuneSeptember 30, 2023, 1,966,616227,602 shares remained available for future grant under the 2021 Plan. 7,374,118694,378 stock-based award units were outstanding under the 2021 Plan and 2018 Plan as of JuneSeptember 30, 2023.

The Company’s 2021 Plan provides for the Company to sell or issue common stock or restricted common stock or to grant incentive stock options or nonqualified stock options for the purchase of common stock, to employees, nonemployees and members of the board of directors of the Company. The 2021 Plan is administered by the board of directors or at the discretion of the board of directors by the compensation committee of the board. The exercise prices, vesting periods, and other restrictions are determined at the discretion of the compensation committee of the board of directors, except that the exercise price per share of stock options may not be less than 100%100% of the fair market value of the share of common stock on the date of grant and the contractual term of stock option may not be greater than 10 years. Stock options granted to
date
typically vest over
four years.

14

years.
F-16

Stock Option Valuation

The assumptions used to determine the fair values of stock options granted to employees and directors are presented as follows:

 

Six months ended June 30,

 

2023

 

2022

Fair value of common stock

 

$1.73 - $2.54

 

$6.54 - $16.56

Dividend yield

 

—%

 

—%

Volatility

 

90.36% - 91.64%

 

82.49% - 86.69%

Risk-free interest rate

 

3.46% - 3.98%

 

1.46% - 3.08%

Expected term (years)

 

5.50 - 6.25

 

5.50 - 6.25

   
Nine months ended September 30,
   
2023
 
2022
Fair value of common stock  $17.30 - $25.40 $23.00 - $165.60  
Dividend yield  —% —%
Volatility  90.36% - 91.64% 82.29% - 88.41%
Risk-free interest rate  3.46% - 3.98% 1.46% - 3.38%
Expected term (years)  5.50 - 6.25 5.38 - 6.25
Summary of Option Activity

The Company’s stock option activity regarding employees, directors, and nonemployees is summarized as follows (

in thousands excepts share and per share amounts)
:

 

Shares

 

 

Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price

 

 

Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (in years)

 

 

Aggregate
intrinsic
value

 

Options outstanding—December 31, 2022

 

 

6,264,898

 

 

$

6.92

 

 

 

8.43

 

 

$

42

 

Granted

 

 

1,184,500

 

 

 

1.86

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

(197,078

)

 

 

0.94

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cancelled

 

 

(244,786

)

 

 

8.15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited

 

 

(1,278,807

)

 

 

6.97

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Options outstanding—June 30, 2023

 

 

5,728,727

 

 

$

6.02

 

 

 

8.23

 

 

$

2,009

 

Options exercisable—June 30, 2023

 

 

2,871,893

 

 

$

6.11

 

 

 

7.81

 

 

 

 

   
Shares
   
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
   
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (in
years)
   
Aggregate
intrinsic
value
 
Options outstanding—December 31, 2022   626,373   $69.20    8.43   $42 
Granted   118,450    18.56           
Exercised   (27,686   9.34           
Cancelled   (55,348   84.53           
Forfeited   (127,789   69.67           
Other   (100   59.58           
                     
Options outstanding—September 30, 2023   533,900   $60.20    8.02   $1,506 
                     
Options exercisable—September 30, 2023   240,475   $59.13    7.65      
                     
Additional information with regard to stock option activity involving employees and directors is as follows (
in thousands except per share amounts)
:

 

Six months ended June 30,

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

Weighted-average grant-date fair value per option of total options granted

 

$

1.37

 

 

$

6.40

 

Aggregate intrinsic value of stock options exercised

 

 

329

 

 

 

89

 

   
Nine months ended September 30,
 
   
2023
   
2022
 
Weighted-average grant-date fair value per option of total options granted  $13.73   $60.40 
Aggregate intrinsic value of stock options exercised   489    286 
As of JuneSeptember 30, 2023, total unrecognized compensation cost related to the unvested awards to employees, directors, and nonemployees is $2.8$2.5 
million, which is expected to be recognized overin October 2023 as a weighted-average periodresult of 1.8 years.

the Company’s merger (see Note 15).

Summary of Restricted Stock Unit Activity

The fair values of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) are based on the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Each RSU represents a contingent right to receive one share of the Company’s common stock upon vesting. In general, RSUs vest (i) annually in four equal installments on the grant anniversary or (ii) incrementally over two years. years. The following table summarizes the Company’s RSU activity for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2023:

 

Number of Restricted
Stock Units

 

 

Weighted-
Average Grant
Date Fair Value

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2022

 

 

1,144,994

 

 

$

6.76

 

Granted

 

 

1,419,000

 

 

 

1.73

 

Vested

 

 

(650,321

)

 

 

3.93

 

Forfeited

 

 

(1,193,516

)

 

 

3.89

 

Outstanding at June 30, 2023

 

 

720,157

 

 

$

4.16

 

15

F-17

   
Number of
Restricted
Stock Units
   
Weighted-
Average Grant
Date Fair Value
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2022   114,461   $67.64 
Granted   141,900    17.30 
Vested   (76,482   38.95 
Forfeited   (119,271   38.92 
Other   (130   55.10 
           
Outstanding at September 30, 2023   60,478   $42.39 
           
As of JuneSeptember 30, 2023, total unrecognized compensation cost related to the unvested awards to employees is $0.4$0.3 
million, which is expected to be recognized overin October 2023 as a weighted-average periodresult of 1.2 years.

the Company’s merger (see Note 15).

Stock Appreciation Rights Valuation

The fair values of stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) are based on the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Each SAR represents a contingent right to receive shares of the Company’s common stock equal to the increase in fair value from the date of grant upon exercise. In general, SARs vest incrementally over 18 months and have a contractual term of 10 years. The assumptions used to determine the fair values of stock appreciation right ("SAR") awardsSARs granted to employees and directors under the 2021 Plan are presented as follows:

Six months ended June 30,

2023

Fair value of common stock

$1.73

Dividend yield

—%

Volatility

90.83%

Risk-free interest rate

3.46%

Expected term (years)

4.0

   
Nine months ended September 30,
 
   
2023
 
Fair value of common stock  $17.30 
Dividend yield   — 
Volatility   90.83
Risk-free interest rate   3.46
Expected term (years)   4.0 
Summary of Stock Appreciation Rights Activity

All SARs granted to date vest incrementally over two years.

The Company’s SAR grant activity regarding employees is summarized as follows (
in thousands excepts share and per share amounts)
:

 

Number of SARs

 

 

Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price per SAR

 

 

Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (in years)

 

 

Aggregate
intrinsic
value

 

Outstanding—January 1, 2023

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

Granted

 

 

1,000,000

 

 

 

1.73

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding—June 30, 2023

 

 

1,000,000

 

 

$

1.73

 

 

 

9.60

 

 

$

1,310

 

Exercisable—June 30, 2023

 

 

258,332

 

 

$

1.73

 

 

 

9.60

 

 

 

 

   
Number
of SARs
   
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price per
SAR
   
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (in
years)
   
Aggregate
intrinsic
value
 
Outstanding—January 1, 2023
   —     $—      —     $—   
Granted   100,000    17.30           
Exercised   —     —            
Forfeited   —     —            
                     
Outstanding—September 30, 2023   100,000   $17.30    9.35   $1,080 
                     
Exercisable—September 30, 2023   33,332   $17.30    9.35      
                     
As of JuneSeptember 30, 2023, total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested awards to employees is $0.2$0.2 
million, which is expected to be recognized overin October 2023 as a weighted-average periodresult of 1.1 years.

the Company’s merger (see Note 15).

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense

regarding
its employees, directors, and nonemployees as follows
(in thousands):

 

Three months ended June 30,

 

 

Six months ended June 30,

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

Research and development expense

 

$

(169

)

 

$

1,703

 

 

$

1,816

 

 

$

2,979

 

General and administrative expense

 

 

1,343

 

 

 

1,143

 

 

 

3,017

 

 

 

2,064

 

Total

 

$

1,174

 

 

$

2,846

 

 

$

4,833

 

 

$

5,043

 

16

:
   
Three months ended
September 30,
   
Nine months ended

September 30,
 
   
2023
   
2022
   
2023
   
2022
 
Research and development expense  $40   $1,742   $1,856   $4,722 
General and administrative expense   1,207    1,299    4,224    3,362 
                     
Total  $1,247   $3,041   $6,080   $8,084 
                     
F-18
13. Net Loss Per Share Attributable to Common Stockholders

The following table summarizes the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders of the Company
(in thousands except share and per share amounts
).

 

Three months ended June 30,

 

 

Six months ended June 30,

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

Net loss and net loss attributable to common stockholders

 

$

(14,738

)

 

$

(18,096

)

 

$

(37,235

)

 

$

(36,355

)

Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders, basic and diluted

 

$

(0.35

)

 

$

(0.44

)

 

$

(0.89

)

 

$

(0.89

)

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding used in computation of
    net loss per common share, basic and diluted

 

 

42,171,841

 

 

 

41,088,085

 

 

 

41,985,372

 

 

 

41,034,447

 

   
Three months ended
September 30,
   
Nine months ended
September 30,
 
   
2023
   
2022
   
2023
   
2022
 
Net loss and net loss attributable to common stockholders  $(7,015  $(19,011  $(44,250  $(55,366
Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders, basic and diluted  $(1.64  $(4.59  $(10.48  $(13.45
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding used in computation of net loss per common share, basic and diluted   4,271,920    4,137,553    4,221,205    4,114,939 
The Company’s potential dilutive securities, which include convertible preferred stock, contingent stock liabilities, restricted stock related to early exercise of common stock options and common stock options, have been excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share as the effect would be antidilutive. Therefore, the weighted average number of common shares outstanding used to calculate both basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders is the same. The following potential dilutive securities, presented on an as converted basis, were excluded from the calculation of net loss per share due to their anti-dilutive effect:

 

Six months ended June 30,

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

Options to purchase common stock

 

 

5,728,727

 

 

 

6,178,773

 

Restricted stock units

 

 

720,157

 

 

 

860,263

 

Restricted stock related to early exercise of options to purchase common stock

 

 

82,505

 

 

 

338,064

 

Stock appreciation rights

 

 

1,000,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,531,389

 

 

 

7,377,100

 

   
Nine months ended
September 30,
 
   
2023
   
2022
 
Options to purchase common stock   533,900    623,298 
Restricted stock units   60,478    112,701 
Restricted stock related to early exercise of options to purchase common stock   5,281    23,792 
Stock appreciation rights   100,000    —  
           
    599,659    759,791 
           

13.

14. Defined Contribution Plan

The Company established a defined contribution savings plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. This plan covers substantially all employees who meet minimum age and service requirements and allows participants to defer a portion of their annual compensation on a pretax basis. Current Company match contributions to the plan are made to employees who meet minimum service requirements in the amount of 100%100% of the first 3%3%, and 50%50% of the next 2
%
of employee contributions, subject to certain limitations. TheContributions made by the Company made contributions in the amount of were immaterial and
$0.1 million and $
0.3
 million for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2023, respectively, and $0.2$0.1 million and $0.3$0.4 million for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2022, respectively.

14. Merger Agreement

On June 22, 2023, following a comprehensive review of strategic alternatives, the Company entered into the Merger Agreement with Tourmaline pursuant to which a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company will merge with and into Tourmaline, with Tourmaline surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The Merger was unanimously approved by the Company’s board of directors, and the Company’s board of directors resolved to recommend approval of the Merger to the Company’s stockholders. In connection with the closing of the Merger, Talaris expects to declare a cash dividend to the pre-Merger Talaris stockholders. The aggregate amount of the special cash dividend will not exceed an amount equal to (a) $67.5 million, minus (b) the Aggregate Cash Amount (as defined in the Merger Agreement).

The closing of the Merger is subject to approval by the Company’s and Tourmaline’s stockholders as well as other customary closing conditions, including the effectiveness of a registration statement filed with the SEC in connection with the transaction and Nasdaq’s approval of the listing of the shares of the Company’s common stock to be issued in connection with the transaction. If the Company is unable to satisfy certain closing conditions or if other mutual closing conditions are not satisfied, Tourmaline will not be obligated to complete the Merger. The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights of each of the Company and Tourmaline. Under certain circumstances detailed in the Merger Agreement, the Company could be required to pay Tourmaline a termination fee of $5.0 million or Tourmaline could be required to pay the Company a termination fee of $7.1 million. In addition, in certain circumstances upon the termination of the Merger Agreement, the Company could be required to pay the costs and expenses of Tourmaline in an amount not to exceed $0.5 million, or Tourmaline could be required to pay the Company’s costs and expenses in an amount not to exceed $0.5 million.

If the Merger is completed, the business of Tourmaline will continue as the business of the combined company.

17


15. Subsequent Events

The Company has evaluated subsequent events through AugustNovember 14, 2023, the date the financial statements were available to be issued. The Company has concluded no subsequent events have occurred that require disclosure, except for those referenced below.

Asset Sale

In July

ImmunoFree Demand Letter
On October 6, 2023, the Company and ImmunoFree executed a binding settlement agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company paid ImmunoFree $4.0 
million and ImmunoFree and the Company mutually released each other from any and all claims, liabilities and/or losses relating to the ImmunoFree APA, the
FREEDOM-1
Study, and the ImmunoFree Demand Letter and the allegations therein. As set forth in the Settlement Agreement, the Company denies any and all liability with respect to this matter, and has resolved it solely to avoid the risks and costs associated with litigating this matter and any risk to the consummation of the Merger Agreement.
F-19

Lease Termination
On October 4, 2023, the Company entered into an asset purchasea lease termination agreement with ImmunoFree, effective July 1, 2023.related to its Boston Lease. Pursuant to the terms of the asset purchaselease termination agreement, Talaris sold certain clinical datathe Company agreed to pay a termination fee of $
0.7 million, consisting of a payment of $0.6 million in cash and intellectual property related to FCR001$0.1 
million
non-cash
consideration for approximately $2.2 million, including a combination of cash consideration, reimbursement of certain expenses and assumption of allits security deposit. These amounts are included in lease liability, current and future clinical wind-down liabilities.other current assets in the accompanying balance sheets as of September 30, 2023. In connection with this agreement,the lease termination, the Company relinquishedsold its remaining long-lived assets held for sale, primarily office furniture and computer equipment.

Reverse Stock Split
Immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger, the Company effected a
1-for-10
Reverse Stock Split of its shares of common stock. As a result of the Reverse Stock Split, every 10 shares of the Company’s common stock held by a stockholder immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split were combined and reclassified into one share of the Company’s common stock. No fractional shares were issued in connection with the Reverse Stock Split. Any fractional shares resulting from the Reverse Stock Split were rounded down to the nearest whole number, and each Company stockholder who would otherwise be entitled to a fraction of a share of common stock upon the Reverse Stock Split (after aggregating all fractions of a share to which such stockholder would otherwise be entitled) was entitled to receive a cash payment in lieu thereof at a price equal to the fraction to which the stockholder would otherwise be entitled multiplied by the closing price of the Company’s common stock on October 19, 2023. No fractional shares of Company common stock were issuable to Legacy Tourmaline stockholders pursuant to the Merger, and no certificates or scrip for any such fractional shares were issued, with no cash being paid for any fractional share eliminated by such rounding.
Merger Agreement and Financing Transaction
On October 19, 2023, the Company completed the Merger with Legacy Tourmaline.
In connection with the Merger, the Company declared a special cash dividend to its stockholders on October 6, 2023 (the “Special Dividend”). The Special Dividend was $15.118 per share of Company common stock, payable in cash. The
ex-dividend
date in respect to the Special Dividend was before market open on October 20, 2023, and only
pre-Merger
stockholders of record as of October 16, 2023, record date for the Special
Dividend
, that continued to hold their eligible shares of the Company until market open on October 20, 2023 were entitled to the dividend payment. The Special Dividend was $
64.7
 million ($67.5 million less the Aggregate Cash Amount (as defined in the Merger Agreement)) and was contingent upon closing of the Merger.
Subject to the terms of the Merger Agreement, immediately prior to effective time of the Merger, (a) all unexpired and unvested Company stock options, stock appreciation rights, underand restricted stock units were accelerated, (b) all outstanding Company restricted stock units and all outstanding and
in-the-money
Company stock options and stock appreciation rights were settled for consideration equal to (i) 55% of each
award’s
value in shares of Company common stock and (ii) 45% of each
award’s
value in cash, and (c) all
out-of-the-money
outstanding Company stock options and stock appreciation rights were cancelled for no consideration. As a result, the ULRF LicenseCompany issued 176,835 shares of Company common stock and paid an Aggregate Cash Amount (as defined in the Merger Agreement) of $2.8 million to certain
pre-Merger
holders of Company stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock units.

Subject to the terms of the Merger Agreement, immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger, (a) certain new and current investors of Legacy Tourmaline purchased an aggregate of $
75.0 
million of common stock of Legacy Tourmaline (the “Pre-Merger Financing Transaction”) and (b) each share of Legacy Tourmaline’s preferred stock was converted into
one
share of Legacy Tourmaline’s common stock. At the effective time of the Merger, the Company issued an aggregate of approximately
15,877,090
shares of its common stock to Legacy Tourmaline’s stockholders, based on an exchange ratio of
0.7977
(without giving effect to the Reverse Stock Split) shares of the Company’s common stock for each share of Legacy Tourmaline common stock outstanding immediately prior to the Merger, including those shares of common stock issued upon the conversion of Legacy Tourmaline preferred stock and those shares of Legacy Tourmaline common stock issued in orderthe
Pre-Merger
Financing Transaction (but excluding shares canceled pursuant to allow ImmunoFreethe Merger Agreement and excluding any dissenting shares). The issuance of the shares of the Company’s common stock issued to license such rightsthe former stockholders of Legacy Tourmaline was registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the Company’s Registration Statement on Form
S-4
(File
No. 333-273335),
as amended.
F-20

Immediately following the effective time of the Merger, 
20,336,741
 shares of the Company’s common stock were issued and outstanding. Company securityholders as of immediately prior to FCR001 from ULRF.

the Merger owned approximately 
21.9
% of the outstanding shares of the Company and former Legacy Tourmaline securityholders, including those who purchased shares in the Pre-Merger Financing Transaction, owned approximately 
78.1
% of the outstanding shares of the Company.
In connection with the Merger, the Company paid an estimated $6.2 million for transaction-related expenses contingent on the Merger, including payments to certain former Talaris employees.
The Company is still evaluating the accounting impact of the Merger.
F-21

18


ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

You should read theThe following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations togetherand the unaudited interim condensed financial statements and related notes included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with (i) Talaris’ audited financial statements and the related notes and the discussion under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 filed with the “Selected Financial Data” sectionSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on March 31, 2023, (ii) Legacy Tourmaline’s audited financial statements and the related notes for the year ended December 31, 2022 and the period from September 17, 2021 (inception) to December 31, 2021 included in the proxy statement/prospectus (the “Proxy Statement/Prospectus”) filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), with the SEC on September 15, 2023 and (iii) the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and for the year ended December 31, 2022 included in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus.

This discussion and analysis and other parts of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this “Quarterly Report”) and our financial statements and the related notes appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. This discussion and other parts of this Quarterly Report contain forward-looking statements based upon current beliefs, plans and expectations related to future events and our future financial performance that involve risks, uncertainties and uncertainties,assumptions, such as statements regarding our intentions, plans, objectives and expectations intentions and projections.for our business. Our actual results and the timing of selected events could differ materially from those discusseddescribed in or implied by these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to,statements as a result of several factors, including those discussed in theset forth under “Risk Factors” sectionin Part II, Item 1A of this Quarterly Report.Report on Form 10-Q. See also the section titled “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”

OverviewRecent Developments

On October 19, 2023, Tourmaline Bio, Inc., formerly known as Talaris Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”), completed its previously announced merger transaction in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 22, 2023 (the “Merger Agreement”), by and among the Company, Tourmaline Bio, Inc. (“Legacy Tourmaline”) and Terrain Merger Sub, Inc., a direct wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub”), pursuant to which Merger Sub merged with and into Legacy Tourmaline, with Legacy Tourmaline surviving as a direct wholly owned subsidiary of the Company and the surviving corporation of the merger (the “Merger”). Following the completion of the Merger, the business conducted by the Company became primarily the business conducted by Tourmaline, which is a late-stage clinical biotechnology company developing transformative medicines that dramatically improve the lives of patients with life-altering immune diseases.

On October 19, 2023, in connection with and prior to the completion of the Merger, the Company effected a We1-for-10 reverse stock split of its common stock (the “Reverse Stock Split”), Legacy Tourmaline changed its name from “Tourmaline Bio, Inc.” to “Tourmaline Sub, Inc.”, and the Company changed its name from “Talaris Therapeutics, Inc.” to “Tourmaline Bio, Inc.”.

Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger, each share of Legacy Tourmaline’s preferred stock was converted into one share of Legacy Tourmaline’s common stock. At the effective time of the Merger, the Company issued an aggregate of approximately 15,877,090 shares of its common stock to Legacy Tourmaline’s stockholders, based on an exchange ratio of 0.7977 (without giving effect to the Reverse Stock Split) shares of the Company’s common stock for each share of Legacy Tourmaline common stock outstanding immediately prior to the Merger, including those shares of common stock issued upon conversion of the Legacy Tourmaline preferred stock and those shares of Legacy Tourmaline common stock issued in the Legacy Tourmaline pre-closing financing transaction (the “Pre-Merger Financing Transaction”) which closed on October 19, 2023, immediately prior to the closing of the Merger (but excluding shares to be canceled pursuant to the Merger Agreement and excluding any dissenting shares).

The issuance of the shares of the Company’s common stock issued to the former stockholders of Legacy Tourmaline was registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-273335), as amended.

The shares of the Company’s common stock listed on The Nasdaq Global Market, previously trading through the close of business on Thursday, October 19, 2023 under the ticker symbol “TALS,” is expected to commence trading on The Nasdaq Global Market on a post-Reverse Stock Split adjusted basis under the ticker symbol “TRML” on October 20, 2023.

The financial information included in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is that of the Company (referred to in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations as “Talaris” in order to avoid confusion) prior to the Merger because the Merger was consummated after the period covered by the financial statements included in this Quarterly Report. Accordingly, the historical financial information included in this Quarterly Report, unless otherwise indicated or as the context otherwise requires, is that of Talaris prior to the Merger.

22


Talaris Overview

As a result of the Merger, our historic business operations ceased and our going forward operations will be those of Legacy Tourmaline. Accordingly, the results of operations reported for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2023 and 2022 in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis are not indicative of the results of operations expected in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 and future years due to the termination of our historic business operations.

Prior to the Merger, Talaris was a cell therapy company that was focused on developing an innovative method of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation ("allo-HSCT"(“allo-HSCT”) that we believe has the potential to transform the standard of care in solid organ transplantation, certain severe autoimmune diseases and certain severe blood, immune and metabolic disorders. In the organ transplant setting, which was our initial focus, we believe our proprietary therapeutic approach, which we call "Facilitated Allo-HSCT Therapy", could prevent organ rejection without the morbidity and mortality that has been associated with the use of lifelong immunosuppression. Beyond the organ transplant setting, we believe that our Facilitated Allo-HSCT Therapy also has the potential to treat a range of severe blood, immune and metabolic disorders, in each case with potential for similar outcomes to what has previously been observed with HSCT, while mitigating the toxicities, morbidities and extended hospital stay associated with the fully myeloablative conditioning typically required by HSCT. We believe that these indications, individually and collectively, represent a significant unmet need and commercial opportunity.

We were incorporated as Regenerex, Inc. in 2018 under the laws of the State of Delaware, having converted from a limited liability company under the name Regenerex LLC. In 2019, we changed our corporate name from Regenerex, Inc. to Talaris Therapeutics, Inc.

Since our inception, we have devoted substantially all of our resources to developing ourTalaris’ lead product candidate FCR001, building our intellectual property portfolio, business planning, raising capital and providing general and administrative support for these operations. To date, we have principally financed our operations through private placements of convertible preferred stock, payments under a former research collaboration with Novartis, Inc., research grants and most recently, our IPO. Through June 30, 2023, we had received net proceeds of $186.2 million from sales of our convertible preferred stock and net proceeds of $137.2 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other expenses, from our IPO.was FCR001.

InPrior to the Merger, in February 2023, weTalaris announced the discontinuation of our its FREEDOM-1 and FREEDOM-2 clinical trials evaluating FCR001’s ability to induce durable tolerance in living donor kidney transplant ("LDKT"(“LDKT”) recipients. This decision was primarily attributable to the pace of enrollment and the associated timelines to critical milestones.

In February 2023, weTalaris also announced a comprehensive review of strategic alternatives focused on maximizing stockholder value, including, but not limited to, an acquisition, merger, possible business combinations and/or a divestiture of the Company’s cell therapy CMC capabilities. We expect to devote substantial time and resources to exploring strategic alternatives that our board of directors believes will maximize stockholder value. Despite devoting significant efforts to identify and evaluate potential strategic alternatives, there can be no assurance that this strategic review process will result in us pursuing any transaction or that any transaction, if pursued, will be completed on attractive terms or at all. We have not set a timetable for completion of this strategic review process, and our board of directors has not approved a definitive course of action. Additionally, there can be no assurances that any particular course of action, business arrangement or transaction, or series of transactions, will be pursued, successfully consummated or lead to increased stockholder value, or that we will make any additional cash distributions to our stockholders. In March 2023, pending the outcome of ourits review of strategic alternatives, weTalaris voluntarily paused enrollment in our its FREEDOM-3 Phase 2 clinical trial, while continuing to evaluate patients for potential future enrollment.

In connection with the evaluation of strategic alternatives and in order to extend our resources, weTalaris implemented a restructuring plan that included reducing our workforce by approximately one-third (the “Initial Reduction in Force”), with remaining employees primarily focused on maintaining ourits cell therapy CMCchemistry, manufacturing and controls (“CMC”) capabilities and executing FREEDOM-3.

In April 2023, the CompanyTalaris announced the April Reduction in Force, that is expected to resultwhich resulted in the termination of approximately 95% of the Company'sTalaris’ remaining workforce. The workforce reductions were substantially completed as of June 30, 2023.

After a comprehensive review of strategic alternatives, including identifying and reviewing potential candidates for a strategic transaction, onOn June 22, 2023, weTalaris entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (“Merger Agreement”), with Tourmaline, pursuant to which our wholly-owned subsidiary will merge with and into Tourmaline, with Tourmaline surviving as our wholly-owned subsidiary. The Merger was unanimously approved by our board of directors, and the board resolved to recommend approval of the Merger Agreement to our stockholders. The closing of the Merger is subject to approval by our and Tourmaline’s stockholders, as well as other customary closing conditions, including the effectiveness of a registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), in connection with the transaction and Nasdaq’s approval of the listing of the shares of our common stock to be issued inAgreement.

19


connection with the transaction. If the Merger is completed, the business of Tourmaline will continue as the business of the combined company.

Concurrently with the execution of the Merger Agreement, Legacy Tourmaline consummated the Pre-Merger Financing Transaction, pursuant to which certain new and existing investors of Legacy Tourmaline entered into a securities purchase agreement with Tourmaline, pursuant to which such investors have agreed to purchasepurchased $75.0 million of Legacy Tourmaline common stock, representing an aggregate commitment of $75.0 million, in the Tourmaline pre-closing financing. The Tourmaline pre-closing financing is expected to be consummated immediately prior to the closing of the Merger.stock.

Prior to the effective time of the Merger, we expect to declareTalaris declared a cash dividend to the pre-Merger Talaris stockholders. The aggregate amount of the special cash dividend will not exceed an amount equal to (a) $67.5 million, minus (b) the Aggregate Cash Amount (as defined in the Merger Agreement).was $64.7 million.

On July 1, 2023, weTalaris entered into an asset purchase agreement with ImmunoFree, pursuant to which weit sold certain clinical data and intellectual property related to FCR001 for approximately $2.2 million, including a combination of cash consideration, reimbursement of certain expenses and assumption of all current and future clinical wind-down liabilities. See Note 15 in the accompanying financial statements.

Our future operations are highly dependent on the success ofPrior to the Merger, Talaris did not generate any revenue and there can be no assurances thathas primarily financed its operations through private placements of convertible preferred stock, payments under a former research collaboration with Novartis, Inc., research grants and its initial public offering, or IPO, completed in May 2021.

Prior to the Merger, will be successfully consummated. There can be no assurance that the strategic review process or any transaction relatingTalaris had received net proceeds of $186.2 million from sales of its convertible preferred stock and net proceeds of $137.2 million from its IPO.

Talaris has never been profitable and has incurred net losses in each year since inception. Prior to a specific asset, including the Merger, or any asset sale, will result in us pursuing such a transaction(s), or that any transaction(s), if pursued, will be completed on terms favorable to us and our stockholders in the existing entity or any possible entity that results from a combination of entities. If the strategic review process is unsuccessful, our board of directors may decide to pursue a dissolution and liquidation.

Since our inception in 2018 and until recently, we had focused substantially all of our efforts and financial resources on organizing and staffing our company, business planning, raising capital, acquiring and developing our technology, identifying potential product candidates and undertaking preclinical studies and clinical trials, including FCR001. We do not have any products approved for sale and have not generated any revenue from product sales.

Since our inception, we have incurred significant operating losses. Our net loss was $37.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and $73.9 million for year ended December 31, 2022. As of June 30, 2023, weTalaris had an accumulated deficit of $202.0 million. We expect to continue to incur$209.0 million and Talaris’ net lossesloss for the foreseeable future.

We expect to continue to incur coststhree months ended September 30, 2023 and expenditures in connection with the processyear ended December 31, 2022 were $7.0 million and $73.9 million, respectively. As of evaluating our strategic alternatives and consummating the Merger. There can be no assurance, however, that we will be able to successfully consummate any particular strategic transaction, including the Merger. The processSeptember 30, 2023, Talaris had approximately $67.1 million of consummating the Merger and continuing to evaluate these strategic options may be very costly, time-consuming and complex and we have incurred, and may in the future incur, significant costs related to these efforts, such as legal, accounting and advisory fees and expenses and other related charges. A considerable portion of these costs will be incurred regardless of whether any such course of action is implemented or transaction is completed, including the Merger. Any such expenses will decrease the remaining cash available for use in our business. In addition, any strategic business combination or other transactions that we may consummate in the future, including the Merger, could have a variety of negative consequences and we may implement a course of action or consummate a transaction that yields unexpected results that adversely affects our business and decreases the remaining cash available for use in our business or the execution of our strategic plan. There can be no assurances that any particular course of action, business arrangement, transaction, including the Merger, or series of transactions, will be pursued, successfully consummated, lead to increased stockholder value, or achieve the anticipated results. Any failure of such potential transaction to achieve the anticipated results could significantly impair our ability to enter into any future strategic transactions and may significantly diminish or delay any future distributions to our stockholders.

Should we resume development of any biopharmaceutical product candidates, our ability to generate product revenue sufficient to achieve profitability will depend heavily on the successful development and eventual commercialization of one or more biopharmaceutical product candidates. In addition, we will incur substantial research and development costs and other expenditures if we should resume development of any biopharmaceutical product candidates. Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with product development, we are unable to predict the timing or amount of increased expenses or when or if we will be able to achieve or maintain profitability. Even if we are able to generate product sales, we may not become profitable. If we fail to become profitable or are unable to sustain profitability on a continuing basis, then we may be unable to continue our operations at planned levels and be forced to reduce or terminate our operations.

20


Based upon our current operating plan, we believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents and $79.9 million of marketable securities of $152.3 million as of June 30, 2023 will be sufficient to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements for more than 12 months from the date of the issuance of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. See “– Liquidity and Capital Resources.”securities.

License Agreement

In October 2018, we entered an amended and restated exclusive license agreement (“ULRF License Agreement”) with University of Louisville Research Foundation (“ULRF”) related to certain licensed patent rights and know-how related to human facilitating cells for our Facilitated Allo-HSCT Therapy approach. Pursuant to the ULRF License Agreement, ULRF granted us an exclusive, worldwide license under such patents and a nonexclusive royalty-bearing, worldwide license for such know-how to research, develop, commercialize and manufacture FCR001 and products containing FCR001 in all fields, without limitation. ULRF also granted us the right to grant sublicenses in accordance with the ULRF License Agreement. Under the terms of the agreement, we are obligated to compensate ULRF three percent of net sales of all licensed products sold, one third of any non-royalty sublicensing income, and up to $1.625 million in regulatory and sales milestones on each licensed product upon the occurrence of specific events as outlined in the license agreement; and annual license maintenance fees. As of June 30, 2023, we have paid ULRF $0.1 million in milestone payments and $0.2 million in annual maintenance fees, for a total of $0.3 million.23

In addition, upon execution of the ULRF License Agreement, we granted contingent equity consideration equal to 65,186 shares of common stock to ULRF. Pursuant to the ULRF License Agreement, on or prior to our first underwritten public offering or any transaction that is treated as a deemed liquidation event, we are required to either issue to ULRF the 65,186 shares in common stock or make a cash payment equal to the 65,186 shares of common stock multiplied by either the price per share of common stock in the underwritten public offering or by the price per share of common stock received in connection with such deemed liquidation event. Coincident with the completion of our IPO in May 2021, we issued to ULRF 48,889 shares of common stock in addition to $0.3 million in a cash payment to fully satisfy the contingent stock liability to ULRF.


In July 2023, we entered into an asset purchase agreement with ImmunoFree, pursuant to which we sold certain clinical data and intellectual property related to FCR001 for approximately $2.2million, including a combination of cash consideration, reimbursement of certain expenses and assumption of all current and future clinical wind-down liabilities. In connection with this agreement, we relinquished our rights under the ULRF License Agreement in order to allow ImmunoFree to license such rights to FCR001 from ULRF.

Components of Our Results of Operations

Revenue

We haveTalaris has not generated any revenue since ourits inception and dodoes not expect to generate any revenue from the sale of products in the future, if at all.

Operating Expenses

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses consistconsisted primarily of costs incurred in connection with the development and research of ourTalaris’ novel cell therapy, as well as unrelated discovery program expenses. We expenseTalaris expensed research and development costs as incurred. These expenses include:included:

employee-related expenses, including salaries, related benefits and stock-based compensation expense, for employees engaged in research and development functions;

external research and development expenses incurred under arrangements with third parties, such as CROs, investigational sites, and consultants;

the cost of acquiring, developing, and manufacturing clinical study materials;

costs associated with preclinical and clinical activities and regulatory operations;

costs incurred in development of intellectual property; and

an allocated portion of facilities and other infrastructure costs associated with ourits research and development activities.

We enterTalaris entered into consulting, research, and other agreements with commercial entities, researchers, universities, and others for the provision of goods and services. Such arrangements arewere generally cancelable upon reasonable notice and payment of costs incurred. Costs arewere considered incurred based on an evaluation of the progress to completion of specific tasks under each contract using

21


information and data provided by the respective vendors, including ourits clinical sites. These costs consistconsisted of direct and indirect costs associated with specific projects, as well as fees paid to various entities that performperformed certain research on behalf of us.it. Depending upon the timing of payments to the service providers, we recognizeTalaris recognized prepaid expenses or accrued expenses related to these costs. These accrued or prepaid expenses are based on management’s estimates of the work performed under service agreements, milestones achieved, and experience with similar contracts. We monitorTalaris monitored each of these factors and adjustadjusted estimates accordingly.

The successful clinical development and subsequent commercialization of product candidates is highly uncertain and we are not certain if or when we may resume development of product candidates. This is due to the numerous risks and uncertainties with product development and commercialization, including significant variations in our clinical development costs as well as the following factors:

per patient trial costs;
the number of trials required for approval;
the number of sites included in the trials;
the countries in which the trials are conducted;
the length of time required to enroll eligible patients;
the number of patients that participate in the trials;
the length of hospitalization of patients in our clinical trials
the drop-out or discontinuation rates of patients;
potential additional safety monitoring requested by regulatory agencies;
the duration of patient participation in the trials and follow-up;
the cost and timing of manufacturing product candidates;
the phase of development of product candidates;
the efficacy and safety profile of product candidates. the timing and progress of nonclinical and clinical development activities;
the number and scope of preclinical and clinical programs we decide to pursue;
raising necessary additional funds;
the progress of the development efforts of parties with whom we may enter into collaboration arrangements;
our ability to maintain our current development program and to establish new ones;
our ability to establish new licensing or collaboration arrangements;
the successful initiation and completion of clinical trials with safety, tolerability and efficacy profiles that are satisfactory to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") or any comparable foreign regulatory authority;
the receipt and related terms of regulatory approvals from applicable regulatory authorities;
the availability of drug substance and drug product for use in production of a product candidate;
the development of commercial scale manufacturing and distribution processes for product candidates;
establishing and maintaining agreements with third-party manufacturers for commercial manufacturing, if we pursue a third party manufacturing strategy outside of the United States, and if a product candidate is approved;
our ability to obtain and maintain patents, trade secret protection and regulatory exclusivity, both in the United States and internationally;
our ability to protect our rights in our intellectual property portfolio;
the commercialization of a product candidate, if and when approved;
obtaining and maintaining third-party insurance coverage and adequate reimbursement;
the acceptance of a product candidate, if approved, by patients, the medical community and third-party payors;

22


competition with other products; and
a continued acceptable safety profile of our therapies following approval.

Should we resume development of any biopharmaceutical product candidates, a change in the outcome of any of these variables with respect to the development of any such product candidate would significantly change the costs and timing associated with their development. We may never succeed in obtaining regulatory approval for any product candidate.

Research and development activities have historically accounted for a significant portion of our operating expenses. We expect our research and development expenses to decrease in the near future as we have discontinued our FREEDOM-1, FREEDOM-2 and FREEDOM-3 clinical trials and have focused on the evaluation and execution of strategic alternatives, including the Merger. Should we resume development of any biopharmaceutical product candidates, we expect research and development costs to increase significantly for the foreseeable future as any product candidate development program progresses.

We haveTalaris historically used ourits personnel and infrastructure resources across multiple research and development programs directed toward identifying and developing product candidates. OurIts direct research and development expenses were historically tracked on a program-by-program basis and consisted primarily of external costs, including fees paid to consultants, contractors and CROs in connection with ourits development activities and the cost of acquiring, developing, and manufacturing clinical study materials. At this time, we doTalaris did not fully allocate personnel costs to individual programs as many of ourits personnel arewere deployed across multiple programs.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses consistconsisted primarily of salaries and related costs for personnel in executive, finance, corporate and business development, human resources and administrative functions. General and administrative expenses also includeincluded legal fees relating to patent and corporate matters, professional fees for accounting, auditing, tax and administrative consulting services, insurance costs and other operating costs, including an allocated portion of facilities and other infrastructure costs associated with ourits general and administrative activities.

We anticipate that our general and administrative expenses to decrease in the near future due to our recent workforce reductions. We expect to incur significant costs, however, related to our evaluation and execution of strategic alternatives, including the Merger, including legal, accounting and advisory expenses and other related charges. We also anticipate that we will continue to incur accounting, legal, regulatory, compliance and director and officer insurance costs as well as investor and public relations expenses associated with being a public company.

24


Restructuring Costs

Restructuring costs consistconsisted of severance, employee termination costs and asset impairment related to ourTalaris’ long-lived assets used primarily in our chemistry, manufacturing and controls ("CMC")its CMC operations.

We anticipate that our restructuring costs may increase in the future as we continue our review of strategic alternatives, including the Merger.

Other Income (Expense), Net

Other income (expense), net iswas comprised of interest income earned on cash reserves in ourTalaris’ operating account and on ourits marketable securities and amortization expense and accretion income on ourits marketable securities.

Results of Operations

Comparison of Three Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, 2023 and 2022

The following table summarizes ourTalaris’ results of operations for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2023 and 2022:

23


 

Three months ended June 30,

 

 

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

Change

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

Operating expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Research and development

 

$

4,088

 

 

$

13,187

 

 

$

(9,099

)

General and administrative

 

 

6,026

 

 

 

5,228

 

 

 

798

 

Restructuring costs

 

 

6,388

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,388

 

Total operating expenses

 

 

16,502

 

 

 

18,415

 

 

 

(1,913

)

Loss from operations

 

 

(16,502

)

 

 

(18,415

)

 

 

1,913

 

Interest and other income (expense), net

 

 

1,764

 

 

 

319

 

 

 

1,445

 

Net loss

 

$

(14,738

)

 

$

(18,096

)

 

$

3,358

 

   Three months ended September 30, 
   2023   2022   Change 
       (in thousands)     

Operating expenses

      

Research and development

  $267   $14,981   $(14,714

General and administrative

   9,114    4,842    4,272 

Restructuring costs

   89    —      89 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

   9,470    19,823    (10,353

Gain on asset sale

   538    —      538 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Loss from operations

   (8,932   (19,823   10,891 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Interest and other income (expense), net

   1,917    812    1,105 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net loss

  $(7,015  $(19,011  $11,996 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Research and development expenses

 

Three months ended June 30,

 

 

 

 

  Three months ended September 30, 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

Change

 

  2023   2022   Change 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

      (in thousands)     

Direct research and development program expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

      

FCR001 clinical and pre-clinical programs

 

$

2,038

 

 

$

3,018

 

 

$

(980

)

  $(324  $4,294   $(4,618
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Indirect research and development expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

      

Personnel related (including stock-based compensation)

 

 

1,163

 

 

 

7,349

 

 

 

(6,186

)

   48    7,301    (7,253

Facilities and other operating costs

 

 

887

 

 

 

2,820

 

 

 

(1,933

)

   543    3,386    (2,843
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total research and development expenses

 

$

4,088

 

 

$

13,187

 

 

$

(9,099

)

  $267   $14,981   $(14,714
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Research and development expenses were $4.1$0.3 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2023, compared to $13.2$15.0 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2022. The decrease of $9.1$14.7 million was primarily due to:

a decrease of $6.2$7.3 million in personnel costs primarily due to a decrease in headcount as a result of ourthe Initial Reduction in Force and April Reduction in Force. Personnel costs for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2023 andincluded immaterial stock-based compensation expense. Personnel costs for the three months ended September 30, 2022 included stock-based compensation expense of ($0.2) million and $1.7 million, respectively;million;

a decrease of $4.6 million in FCR001 external clinical program expenses related to the discontinuation of Talaris’ FREEDOM-1, FREEDOM-2, and FREEDOM-3 clinical trials in the first quarter of 2023. Costs incurred in the third quarter of 2023 related to the close-out of these clinical trials; and

25


a decrease of $1.9 million in other costs primarily due to a decrease in consulting, research collaborations, and other services related to the discontinuation of the FREEDOM-1, FREEDOM-2 and FREEDOM-3 clinical trials, and pre-clinical activities in the first quarter of 2023; and
a decrease of $1.0 million in FCR001 external clinical program expenses related to the discontinuation of our FREEDOM-1, FREEDOM-2, and FREEDOM-3 clinical trials in the first quarter of 2023. Costs incurred in the second quarter of 2023 related to the wind-down of these clinical trials.

a decrease of $2.8 million in other costs primarily due to a decrease in consulting, research collaborations, and other services related to the discontinuation of the FREEDOM-1, FREEDOM-2 and FREEDOM-3 clinical trials, and pre-clinical activities in the first quarter of 2023.

General and Administrative Expenses

The following table summarizes ourTalaris’ general and administrative expenses to support ourits business activities for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2023 and 2022:

 

Three months ended June 30,

 

 

 

 

  Three months ended September 30, 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

Change

 

  2023   2022   Change 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

      (in thousands)     

Personnel related (including stock-based compensation)

 

$

1,430

 

 

$

2,472

 

 

$

(1,042

)

  $1,621   $2,699   $(1,078

Professional and consulting fees

 

 

3,356

 

 

 

808

 

 

 

2,548

 

   5,851    817    5,034 

Facility-related and other

 

 

1,240

 

 

 

1,948

 

 

 

(708

)

   1,642    1,326    316 
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total general and administrative expenses

 

$

6,026

 

 

$

5,228

 

 

$

798

 

  $9,114   $4,842   $4,272 
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

General and administrative expenses were $6.0$9.1 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2023 compared to $5.2$4.8 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2022. The increase in general and administrative costs of $0.8$4.3 million was primarily due to:

an increase of $2.5$5.0 million in professional and consulting fees relatedprimarily due to $4.0 million in legal settlement reserve as a result of the ImmunoFree Demand Letter (see Note 15 of the accompanying financial statements) and an increase in legal and consulting fees in connection with the Merger and evaluation of strategic alternatives;

and

24


a decrease of $1.0$1.1 million in personnel costs primarily due to a decrease in headcount and a decrease in stock-based compensation as a result of the Initial Reduction in Force and April Reduction in Force; and

an decrease of $0.7 million in facility-related and other expenses primarily due to a decrease in our director and officer insurance premiums and a decrease in IT expenses stemming from the decrease in personnel in the second quarter of 2023 as compared to 2022.

an increase of $0.3 million in facility-related and other expenses primarily due to non-cash impairment expense related to its Wellesley lease and long-lived assets offset by a decrease in its director and officer insurance premiums in 2023.

Restructuring Costs

Restructuring costs for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2023 were comprised of $5.7$0.1 million in severance and employee termination costs related to ourthe April Reduction in Force and a $0.7 million non-cash asset impairment related to computer equipment. WeForce. Talaris did not incur any restructuring costs in the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2022.

Other Income, Net

Other income, net in the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2023 was comprised of $1.4$1.2 million of net accretion income on ourTalaris’ marketable securities and $0.4$0.7 million in interest income from ourits marketable securities and operating cash balance. Other income, net in the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2022 was comprised of $0.2 million in interest income from ourits marketable securities and operating cash balance and $0.1$0.6 million of net accretion income on ourits marketable securities.

26


Comparison of SixNine Months Ended March 31,September 30, 2023 and 2022

The following table summarizes ourTalaris’ results of operations for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2023 and 2022:

 

Six months ended June 30,

 

 

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

Change

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

Operating expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Research and development

 

$

17,503

 

 

$

27,383

 

 

$

(9,880

)

General and administrative

 

 

12,208

 

 

 

9,446

 

 

 

2,762

 

Restructuring costs

 

 

10,869

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,869

 

Total operating expenses

 

 

40,580

 

 

 

36,829

 

 

 

3,751

 

Loss from operations

 

 

(40,580

)

 

 

(36,829

)

 

 

(3,751

)

Interest and other income (expense), net

 

 

3,345

 

 

 

474

 

 

 

2,871

 

Net loss

 

$

(37,235

)

 

$

(36,355

)

 

$

(880

)

   Nine months ended September 30, 
   2023   2022   Change 
       (in thousands)     

Operating expenses

      

Research and development

  $17,770   $42,364   $(24,594

General and administrative

   21,322    14,288    7,034 

Restructuring costs

   10,958    —      10,958 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

   50,050    56,652    (6,602

Gain on asset sale

   538    —      538 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Loss from operations

   (49,512   (56,652   7,140 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Interest and other income (expense), net

   5,262    1,286    3,976 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net loss

  $(44,250  $(55,366  $11,116 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Research and development expenses

 

Six months ended June 30,

 

 

 

 

  Nine months ended September 30, 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

Change

 

  2023   2022   Change 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

      (in thousands)     

Direct research and development program expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

      

FCR001 clinical and pre-clinical programs

 

$

5,379

 

 

$

7,111

 

 

$

(1,732

)

  $5,054   $11,405   $(6,351

Indirect research and development expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

      

Personnel related (including stock-based compensation)

 

 

8,516

 

 

 

14,064

 

 

 

(5,548

)

   8,564    21,366    (12,802

Facilities and other operating costs

 

 

3,608

 

 

 

6,208

 

 

 

(2,600

)

   4,152    9,593    (5,441
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total research and development expenses

 

$

17,503

 

 

$

27,383

 

 

$

(9,880

)

  $17,770   $42,364   $(24,594
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Research and development expenses were $17.5$17.8 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2023, compared to $27.4$42.4 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2022. The decrease of $9.9$24.6 million was primarily due to:

a decrease of $5.5$12.8 million in personnel costs primarily due to a decrease in headcount as a result of ourthe Initial Reduction in Force and April Reduction in Force. Personnel costs for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2023 and 2022 include stock-based compensation expense of $1.8 million and $3.0 million, respectively;

a decrease of $2.6 million in other operating costs primarily due to a decrease in consulting, research collaborations, and other services related to the discontinuation of the FREEDOM-1 and FREEDOM-2 clinical trials in February 2023; and
a decrease of $1.7 million in FCR001 external clinical program expenses related to the discontinuation of our FREEDOM-1, FREEDOM-2 and FREEDOM-3 clinical trials in the first quarter of 2023.

25


a decrease of $6.4 million in FCR001 external clinical program expenses related to the discontinuation of Talaris’ FREEDOM-1, FREEDOM-2 and FREEDOM-3 clinical trials in the first quarter of 2023; and

a decrease of $5.4 million in other operating costs primarily due to a decrease in consulting, research collaborations, and other services related to the discontinuation of the FREEDOM-1 and FREEDOM-2 clinical trials in the first quarter of 2023.

General and Administrative Expenses

The following table summarizes ourTalaris’ general and administrative expenses to support ourits business activities for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2023 and 2022:

 

Six months ended June 30,

 

 

 

 

  Nine months ended September 30, 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

Change

 

  2023   2022   Change 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

      (in thousands)     

Personnel related (including stock-based compensation)

 

$

4,847

 

 

$

4,720

 

 

$

127

 

  $6,468   $7,418   $(950

Professional and consulting fees

 

 

4,442

 

 

 

1,370

 

 

 

3,072

 

   10,293    2,187    8,106 

Facility-related and other

 

 

2,919

 

 

 

3,356

 

 

 

(437

)

   4,561    4,683    (122
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total general and administrative expenses

 

$

12,208

 

 

$

9,446

 

 

$

2,762

 

  $21,322   $14,288   $7,034 
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

27


General and administrative expenses were $12.2$21.3 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2023, compared to $9.4$14.3 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2022. The increase in general and administrative costs of $2.8$7.0 million was primarily due to:

an increase of $3.1$8.1 million in professional and consulting fees related to $4.0 million legal settlement reserve as a result of the ImmunoFree Demand Letter and an increase in legal and consulting fees in connection with the Merger and evaluating our strategic alternatives;

an increase

a decrease of $0.1$1.0 million in personnel costs primarily due to increased stock-based compensation expense stemming from additional incentive equity grants;a decrease in headcount as a result of the Initial Reduction in Force and April Reduction in Force, offset by an increase in stock based compensation; and

a decrease of $0.4$0.1 million in facility-related and other expenses primarily due to a decrease in ourTalaris’ director and officer insurance premiums.

Restructuring Costs

Restructuring costs in the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2023 waswere comprised of $7.4$7.5 million in severance and employee termination costs related to our reductionsthe Initial Reductions in forces announcedForce and the April Reduction in February and April 2023,Force and $3.4 million non-cash asset impairment primarily related to long-lived assets used primarily in ourTalaris’ CMC operations. WeTalaris did not incur any restructuring costs in the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2022.

Other Income, Net

Other income, net in the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2023 was comprised of $2.6$3.9 million of net accretion income on ourTalaris’ marketable securities and $0.7$1.4 million in interest income from ourits marketable securities and operating cash balance. Other income, net in the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2022 was comprised of $0.4$0.6 million in interest income from ourits marketable securities and operating cash balance and $0.1$0.7 million of net accretion income on ourits marketable securities.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Since ourTalaris’ inception, we haveit incurred significant operating losses. We haveIt did not yet commercializedcommercialize any products and we doit will not expect to generate revenue from sales of products for several years, if at all.in the future. Since 2018, we have funded ourTalaris financed its operations primarily with proceeds from the sale of ourits convertible preferred stock and ourits IPO in May 2021. Through JuneSeptember 30, 2023, weit had received net proceeds of $186.2 million from sales of ourits convertible preferred stock and net proceeds of $137.2 million from its IPO, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other expenses, from our IPO.expenses.

Cash in excess of immediate requirements iswas invested in accordance with ourTalaris’ investment policy, primarily with a view to liquidity and capital preservation. OurTalaris’ primary use of cash iswas to fund operating expenses, which historically has consisted primarily of research and development expenditures, and to a lesser extent, general and administrative expenditures. Cash used to fund operating expenses iswere impacted by the timing of when we payit paid these expenses, as reflected in the change in ourits outstanding accounts payable and accrued expenses. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2023, weTalaris had cash and cash equivalents of $18.4$67.1 million and marketable securities of $133.9$79.9 million.

Prior to the effective time of the Merger, Talaris declared a cash dividend to the 26pre-Merger Talaris stockholders. The aggregate amount of the special cash was $64.7 million. In connection with the Merger, Legacy Tourmaline consummated the Pre-Merger Financing Transaction, raising gross proceeds of $75.0 million, before deducting transaction-related expenses. Upon the consummation of the Merger and the Pre-Merger Financing Transaction, the post-merger combined company had cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities of approximately $218.2 million.

The Company expects there will be no further material cash expenditures related to Talaris’ FCR001 clinical trials. From the date of the Merger, the activities of the Company will become those of Legacy Tourmaline.

28


The Company is in the business of developing biopharmaceuticals, and it has no current or near-term revenues. The Company is incurring substantial clinical and other costs in its drug development efforts. The Company expects it will need to raise additional capital in order to fully realize management’s plans.

After the consummation of the Merger, the Company believes that its current financial resources are sufficient to fund its operations for its operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements through 2026.

Cash Flows

The following table summarizes ourTalaris’ sources and uses of cash for each of the periods presented:

 

Six months ended June 30,

 

 

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

Change

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

Net cash used in operating activities

 

$

(31,581

)

 

$

(33,560

)

 

$

1,979

 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

 

 

36,329

 

 

 

40,355

 

 

 

(4,026

)

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

 

183

 

 

 

109

 

 

 

74

 

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash

 

$

4,931

 

 

$

6,904

 

 

$

(1,973

)

   Nine months ended September 30,     
   2023   2022   Change 
   (in thousands) 

Net cash used in operating activities

  $(39,102  $(46,987  $7,885 

Net cash provided by investing activities

   92,258    46,659    45,599 

Net cash provided by financing activities

   257    182    75 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash

  $53,413   $(146  $53,559 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash Flow from Operating Activities

During the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2023, operating activities used $31.6$39.1 million of cash, due to ourTalaris’ net loss of $37.2$44.3 million and $1.0$1.9 million of cash used from changes in ourits operating assets and liabilities, partially offset by non-cash charges of $6.1$7.0 million. Net cash used from changes in ourits operating assets and liabilities primarily consisted of a $1.1$3.0 million decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses related to payment of accrued compensation arrangements and a $0.5$0.7 million decrease in ourits operating lease liability. These were offset by a $0.4$1.7 million decrease in prepaids and other current assets driven by amortization of annual subscriptions and director and officer insurance premiums in the quarter and a $0.2 million increase in other liabilities. premiums. Non-cash charges primarily consisted of $4.8$6.1 million of stock-based compensation expense, $2.9$3.6 million long-lived asset impairment, $0.5 million right-of-use asset impairment and $0.1 million in loss on disposal of assets, offset by a net $1.7$2.7 million of depreciation on fixed assets, accretion of marketable securities and amortization of right-of-use assets. assets and $0.5 million gain on asset sale.

During the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2022, operating activities used $33.6$47.0 million of cash, due to ourTalaris’ net loss of $36.4$55.4 million and $3.2$0.9 million of cash used from changes in ourits operating assets and liabilities, partially offset by non-cash charges of $6.0$9.3 million. Net cash used from changes in ourits operating assets and liabilities primarily consisted of a $2.4$1.7 million increase in prepaids and other current assets driven by annual director and officer insurance premium paid in the quarter ending June 30, 2022, a net $0.6 million decrease in accounts payablepremiums, timing of CRO prepaids, and accrued expenses driven by compensationdeferred offering costs related accrualsto its registration statement on Form S-3 and a $0.3$0.4 million decrease in operating lease liability driven by lease payments. These were offset by a $0.6 million increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses driven by compensation related accruals and $0.1 million increase in other liabilities. Non-cash charges primarily consisted of $5.0$8.1 million of stock-based compensation expense, $0.6$0.4 million of depreciation on fixed assets and amortization of marketable securities, and $0.4$0.6 million of amortization of right-of-use assets. assets, and $0.2 million of asset impairment.

Cash Flow from Investing Activities

During the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2023, investing activities provided $36.3$92.3 million of cash, due to maturities of marketable securities of $111.5$177.3 million, partially offset by purchases of marketable securities of $74.6$85.2 million and purchases of property and equipment of $0.5 million.

During the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2022, investing activities provided $40.4$46.7 million of cash, due to maturities of marketable securities of $130.8$190.0 million, partially offset by purchases of marketable securities of $88.0$140.6 million and purchases of property and equipment of $4.2$2.8 million.

29


Cash Flow from Financing Activities

During the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2023, net cash provided by financing activities was $0.3 million primarily consisting of proceeds from exercise of stock options.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2022, net cash provided by financing activities was $0.2 million primarily consisting of proceeds from exercise of stock options.

During the six months ended June 30, 2022, net cash provided by financing activities was $0.1 million primarily consisting of proceeds from ESPP share issuances and exercise of stock options.

Future Funding Requirements

We currentlySince inception, the Company has not generated any revenue from product sales. Management does not expect ourto generate any meaningful product revenue unless and until Tourmaline obtains regulatory approval of and commercializes its product candidate and any future product candidates, and management does not know when, or if, that will occur. Until the Company can generate significant revenue from product sales, if ever, it will continue to require substantial additional capital to develop its product candidate and any future product candidates and fund operations for the foreseeable future. Management expects the Company’s expenses to decreaseincrease in 2023 comparedconnection with its ongoing activities as described in greater detail below. The Company is subject to 2022 as a resultall the risks incident in the development of our decision to discontinue our FREEDOM-1, FREEDOM-2new biopharmaceutical products, and FREEDOM-3 clinical trialsit may encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications, delays, and conduct workforce reductions while we evaluate and execute strategic alternatives, including the Merger. As of June 30, 2023, we had cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of $152.3 million. Based on our current operating plans, we believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities will enable us to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements for more than twelve months from the date of issuance of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We have based this estimate on assumptionsother unknown factors that may prove to be wrong, and we could exhaust our available capital resources sooner than we expect. harm the Company’s business.

In addition, our resource requirements could materially change depending on the outcome of our

27


ongoing strategic review process, including to the extent we identify and enter into any potential strategic transaction. Because our resource requirements could materially change depending on the outcome of our ongoing strategic alternative review process, we are unable to estimate the exact amount of our working capital requirements.

Developing pharmaceutical products, including conducting preclinical studies and clinical trials, is a time-consuming, expensive and uncertain process that takes yearsorder to complete the development of TOUR006 and we may never generate the necessary data or results required to obtain marketing approval for any future product candidates or generate revenue fromand to build the sale of any product candidate for which we may obtainsales, marketing approval. In addition, ourand distribution infrastructure that management believes will be necessary to commercialize product candidates, if approved, may not achieve commercial success. Our commercial revenues, if any, may be derived from sales of drugs that we do not expect to be commercially available for many years, if ever. Accordingly, wethe Company will need to obtainrequire substantial additional funds to achieve our business objectives should we resume development of any pharmaceutical products.

Adequate additional funds may not be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all. We do not currently have any committed external source of funds. Untilcapital. Accordingly, until such time that the Company can generate a sufficient amount of revenue from product sales or other sources, if ever, as we can generate substantial product revenue, we expectmanagement expects to finance our cash needsseek to raise any necessary additional capital through a combination ofprivate or public equity offerings, royalty-based financings,or debt financings, loans or other capital sources, which could include income from collaborations, strategic alliances, andpartnerships or other marketing, distribution, licensing or licensingother strategic arrangements with third parties.parties, or from grants. To the extent that we raisethe Company raises additional capital through the sale of equity financings or convertible debt securities, the ownership interest mayof its stockholders will be materiallyor could be diluted, and the terms of suchthese securities couldmay include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect yourthe rights as aof its common stockholder.stockholders. Debt financing royalty-based financing and preferred equity financing, if available, may involve agreements that include restrictive covenants that limit ourlimiting or restricting the Company’s ability to take specifiedspecific actions, such as incurringincluding restricting its operations and limiting its ability to incur liens, issue additional debt, makingpay dividends, repurchase its own common stock, make certain investments or engage in merger, consolidation, licensing, or asset sale transactions. If the Company raises capital expenditures or declaring dividends. If we raise funds through royalty-based financings, collaborations, strategic alliances or marketing, distribution or licensingpartnerships, and other similar arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies, future revenue streams, research programs or product candidates or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. If we are unable to raise additional funds through equity or debt financings or other arrangements when needed, weit may be required to delay, reduce or eliminate our product development or future commercialization efforts, or grant rights to develop and market product candidates that wethe Company would otherwise prefer to develop and market ourselves.themselves. The Company may be unable to raise additional capital from these sources on favorable terms, or at all. the Company’s ability to raise additional capital may be adversely impacted by potential worsening global economic conditions and the recent disruptions to, and volatility in, the credit and financial markets in the United States and worldwide resulting from recent bank failures, other general macroeconomic conditions and otherwise. The failure to obtain sufficient capital on acceptable terms when needed could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations or financial condition, including requiring the Company to delay, reduce or curtail its research, product development or future commercialization efforts. The Company may also be required to license rights to product candidates at an earlier stage of development or on less favorable terms than the Company would otherwise choose. Management cannot provide assurance that the Company will ever generate positive cash flow from operating activities.

Contractual Obligations

We are currently a party to four operating leases for our manufacturing facility in Louisville, Kentucky, laboratory space in Houston, Texas, corporate office space in Wellesley, Massachusetts, and additional corporate office space in Louisville, Kentucky. The future minimum lease obligations for these leases total $1.1 million over the next three years. Furthermore, as discussed elsewhere in this quarterly report, we are party to the ULRF License Agreement. Under the termsBecause of the ULRF License Agreement,numerous risks and uncertainties associated with research, development and commercialization of product candidates, the Company is obligatedunable to compensate ULRF three percentestimate the exact amount and timing of netits capital requirements. The Company’s future funding requirements will depend on many factors, including:

the scope, timing, progress, results, and costs of researching and developing TOUR006, and conducting larger and later-stage clinical trials;

the scope, timing, progress, results, and costs of researching and developing other product candidates that the Company may pursue;

the costs, timing, and outcome of regulatory review of TOUR006 and any future product candidates;

30


the costs of future activities, including product sales, medical affairs, marketing, manufacturing, and distribution, for TOUR006 and any future product candidates for which it receives marketing approval;

the costs of all licensedmanufacturing commercial-grade products sold, oneand sufficient inventory to support commercial launch;

the revenue, if any, received from commercial sale of Tourmaline’s products, should any of its product candidate and any future product candidates receive marketing approval;

the cost and timing of attracting, hiring, and retaining skilled personnel to support Tourmaline’s operations and continued growth;

the costs of preparing, filing and prosecuting patent applications, maintaining and enforcing Tourmaline’s intellectual property rights and defending intellectual property-related claims;

Tourmaline’s ability to establish, maintain, and derive value from collaborations, partnerships or other marketing, distribution, licensing, or other strategic arrangements with third parties on favorable terms, if at all;

the extent to which the profile of marketed or development stage competing products affects the clinical and commercial potential of Tourmaline’s products;

the extent to which Tourmaline acquires or in-licenses other product candidates and technologies, if any; and

the costs associated with operating as a public company.

A change in the outcome of any non-royalty sublicensing income,of these or other factors with respect to the development of TOUR006 and up to $1.625 million in regulatoryany of Tourmaline’s future product candidates could significantly change the costs and sales milestones on each licensedtiming associated with the development of that product upon occurrence of specific events as outlinedcandidate. Furthermore, Tourmaline’s operating plans may change in the ULRF License Agreement;future, and annual license maintenance fees.Tourmaline may need additional capital to meet the capital requirements associated with such operating plans.

In July 2023, we entered into an asset purchase agreement with ImmunoFree, pursuant to which we sold certain clinical data and intellectual property related to FCR001. In connection with this agreement, we relinquished our rights under the ULRF License Agreement in order to allow ImmunoFree to license such rights to FCR001 from ULRF.

We have entered into other contracts in the normal course of business with certain CROs and other third parties for nonclinical research studies and testing, as well as clinical trials. These contracts do not contain any minimum purchase commitments and are cancelable by us upon prior notice. Payments due upon cancellation consist only of payments for services provided and expenses incurred, including non-cancelable obligations of our service providers, up to the date of cancellation.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our management'sTalaris’ management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based on ourits financial statements, which arewere prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States. The preparation of ourTalaris’ financial statements and related disclosures requires usrequired it to make estimates and judgments that affectaffected the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, costs and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities in ourits financial statements. We base ourTalaris based its estimates on historical experience, known trends and events and various other factors that we believeit believes are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. We evaluate ourTalaris evaluated its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. OurIts actual results maycould differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

While ourTalaris’ significant accounting policies are described in more detail in Note 2 to ourits accompanying financial statements, we believeit believes that the following accounting policies are those most critical to the judgments and estimates used in the preparation of ourits financial statements.

Research and Development Contract Costs and Accruals

28


As part of the process of preparing ourTalaris’ financial statements, we areit was required to estimate ourits accrued research and development expenses. This process involvesinvolved reviewing open contracts and purchase orders, communicating with ourits applicable personnel to identify services that have been performed on ourits behalf and estimating the level of service performed and the associated cost incurred for the service when we haveit has not yet been invoiced or otherwise notified of actual costs. The majority of ourTalaris’ service providers invoice usinvoiced it in arrears for services performed, on a pre-determined schedule or when contractual milestones are met; however, some requirerequired advance payments. We makeTalaris

31


made estimates of ourits accrued expenses as of each balance sheet date in the financial statements based on facts and circumstances known to usit at that time. WeTalaris periodically confirmconfirmed the accuracy of these estimates with the service providers and makemade adjustments, if necessary. Examples of estimated accrued research and development expenses includeincluded fees paid to vendors in connection with clinical development activities and CROs and investigative sites in connection with pre-clinical, non-clinical, and human clinical trials.

We baseTalaris based the expense recorded related to external research and development on ourits estimates of the services received and efforts expended pursuant to quotes and contracts with multiple CROs that supply, conductsupplied, conducted and managemanaged clinical trials on ourits behalf. The financial terms of these agreements arewere subject to negotiation, varyvaried from contract to contract and may resulthave resulted in uneven payment flows. There may bewere instances in which payments made to ourits vendors will exceedexceeded the level of services provided and resultresulted in a prepayment of the expense. In accruing service fees, we estimateTalaris estimated the time period over which services will bewere performed and the level of effort to be expended in each period. If the actual timing of the performance of services or the level of effort variesvaried from the estimate, we adjustTalaris adjusted the accrual or the amount of prepaid expenses accordingly. Although we doTalaris does not expect ourits estimates to be materially different from amounts actually incurred, ourits understanding of the status and timing of services performed relative to the actual status and timing of services performed may vary and may result in reporting amounts that are too high or too low in any particular period. To date, there have not been any material adjustments to ourTalaris’ prior estimates of accrued research and development expenses. There have been no changes to ourits process of determining external research and development expense accruals during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2023.

Stock Based Compensation Expense

We measureTalaris measured stock-based awards granted to employees, directors, and nonemployees based on their fair value on the date of the grant and recognizerecognized compensation expense for those awards over the requisite service period, which iswas generally the vesting period of the respective award. For stock-based awards with service-based vesting conditions, we recognizeTalaris recognized compensation expense using the straight-line method. The fair value of each stock option grant iswas estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which requiresrequired inputs based on certain subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility, the expected term of the option, the risk-free interest rate for a period that approximates the expected term of the option, and ourTalaris’ expected dividend yield. The fair value of each option to purchase common stock award iswas estimated on the date of grant based on the fair value of ourits common stock on that same date.

As there had beenwas no public market for ourTalaris common stock prior to the closing of ourits IPO, the estimated fair value of ourits common stock was determined by ourits board of directors as of the date of each option grant with input from management, considering ourits most recently available third-party valuations of common stock, and ourits board of directors’ assessment of additional objective and subjective factors that it believed were relevant and which may have changed from the date of the most recent valuation through the date of the grant. These independent third-party valuations of ourTalaris equity instruments were performed contemporaneously with identified value inflection points. OurTalaris common stock valuation was prepared using the option-pricing method (“OPM”), which used a market approach to estimate ourits enterprise value, as well as the probability-weighted expected return method (“PWERM”) and the hybrid method, a combination of OPM and PWERM.

For all stock-based awards granted ended after the closing of ourTalaris’ IPO, weit did not have not had to estimate the fair value of ourits common stock as it has beenwas determined based on the quoted market price of ourTalaris’ common stock. For the threenine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2023, the quoted market price of ourTalaris’ common stock was used in determining the fair value of ourits stock-based compensation awards, and no other significant estimates were used in determining those amounts.

Emerging Growth Company and Smaller Reporting Status

In April 2012, the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (“JOBS Act”) was enacted. Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that an “emerging growth company” (“EGC”) can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“Securities Act”), for complying with new or revised accounting standards. Thus, an EGC can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We haveTalaris has elected to use the extended transition period for new or revised accounting standards during the period in which we remainit remains an emerging growth company; however, weit may adopt certain new or revised accounting standards early to the extent allowed by the standard.

We

32


The Company will remain an emerging growth company until the earliest to occur of: (i) the last day of the fiscal year in which we haveit has more than $1.235 billion in annual revenue; (ii) the date we qualifyit qualifies as a “large accelerated filer,” with at least $700.0 million of equity securities held by non-affiliates; (iii) the date on which we haveit has issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt securities during the prior three-year period; and (iv) the last day of the fiscal year ending after the fifth anniversary of ourits initial public offering.

29


We areThe Company is also a “smaller reporting company” meaning that the market value of ourits stock held by non-affiliates is less than $700 million and ourits annual revenue was less than $100 million during the most recently completed fiscal year. WeThe Company may continue to be a smaller reporting company if either (i) the market value of ourits stock held by non-affiliates is less than $250 million or (ii) ourits annual revenue was less than $100 million during the most recently completed fiscal year and the market value of ourits stock held by non-affiliates is less than $700 million. If we arethe Company is a smaller reporting company at the time we ceaseit ceases to be an emerging growth company, weit may continue to rely on exemptions from certain disclosure requirements that are available to smaller reporting companies. Specifically, as a smaller reporting company weit may choose to present only the two most recent fiscal years of audited financial statements in ourits Annual Report on Form 10-K and, similar to emerging growth companies, smaller reporting companies have reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We did not have during the periods presented, and we do not currently have, any off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

A description of recently issued accounting pronouncements that may potentially impact ourTalaris’ financial position and results of operations is disclosed in Note 2 to ourits financial statements appearing at the beginning of this Quarterly Report.

30

33


ITEM 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and are not required to provide the information specified under this item.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Our primary exposure to market risk relates to changes in interest rates. As of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, we had cash and cash equivalents of $18.4 million and $13.7 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, we had marketable securities of $133.9 million and $167.6 million, respectively. Our exposure to interest rate sensitivity is affected by changes in the general level of U.S. interest rates. If market interest rates were to increase immediately and uniformly by 100 basis points, or one percentage point, the net fair value of our interest sensitive marketable securities would not experience a material change in fair market value.

All of our employees and our operations are currently located in the United States. We have, from time to time, engaged in contracts with contractors or other vendors in a currency other than the U.S. dollar. To date, we have had minimal exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates as the time period between the date that transactions are initiated, and the date of payment or receipt of payment is generally of short duration. Accordingly, we believe we do not have a material exposure to foreign currency risk.

Inflation generally affects us by increasing our cost of labor. We continue to monitor the impact of rising inflation on our business and do not believe that inflation had a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations during the three months ended June 30, 2023 and year ended December 31, 2022.

ITEM 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation and supervision of our interim Chief Executive Officer and President andour Interim Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of JuneSeptember 30, 2023. The term “disclosure2023, the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Disclosure controls and procedures” as (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), mean controls and other procedures of a company thatAct) are designed to ensureprovide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by usa company in the reports that we fileit files or submitsubmits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC")SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to oura company’s management, including ourits principal executive officer and our principal financial officer (our interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer),officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.disclosure.

Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgement in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on thetheir evaluation, of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2023, our interimthe Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective atas of September 30, 2023 because of the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting described below.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable assurance level.possibility that a material misstatement of annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

We identified material weaknesses in the design and operating effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting primarily related to limited staffing levels within the finance and accounting departments that were not commensurate with our financial accounting and reporting requirements. We had to rely increasingly on outsourced service providers and specialists, without adequate resources to monitor such work and did not maintain appropriate segregation of duties. Based on this, we did not fully implement components of the COSO framework, resulting in material weaknesses either individually, or in the aggregate, in the control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring components.

As discussed above, the unaudited interim financial statements included in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are those of the Company prior to the Merger because the Merger was consummated after the period covered by the unaudited interim financial statements. There were no adjustments that resulted from the above material weaknesses. However, these material weaknesses could, in the future, result in a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements that would not be prevented or detected.

Remediation Plans

We have taken and will continue to take certain measures to remediate the material weaknesses described above.

As of September 30, 2023, we have continued with the remediation steps that were initiated in the third quarter of 2023, including, but not limited to, hiring additional accounting personnel with expertise commensurate with our financial accounting and reporting requirements and that have the requisite experience to oversee outsourced service providers and specialists, upgrading our financial systems and implementing information technology general controls, establishing controls to identify, assess, and respond to the risks of material misstatement, and establishing controls to identify and account for certain non-routine, unusual or complex transactions in a timely fashion.

The elements of our remediation plans can only be accomplished over time, and we can offer no assurance that these initiatives will ultimately have the intended effects. As management continues to evaluate and work to improve our internal control over financial reporting, management may determine it is necessary to take additional measures to address the material weaknesses. These material weaknesses will not be considered remediated unless and until

34


such time as management designs and implements effective controls that operate for a sufficient period of time and concludes, through testing, that these controls are effective. Until the controls have been operating for a sufficient period of time and management has concluded, through testing, that these controls are operating effectively, the material weaknesses described above will continue to exist. Management is monitoring the progress of the remediation plan and reporting regularly to the audit committee of the board of directors on the progress and results of the remediation plan, including the identification, status and resolution of internal control deficiencies. We can provide no assurance that the measures we have taken and plan to take in the future will remediate the material weaknesses identified or that any additional material weakness or restatements of financial results will not arise in the future due to a failure to implement and maintain adequate internal control over financial reporting or circumvention of these controls. In addition, even if we are successful in strengthening our controls and procedures, in the future these controls and procedures may not be adequate to prevent or identify irregularities or errors or to facilitate the fair presentation of our financial statements.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There hasFor the three months ended September 30, 2023, other than the remediation efforts described above, there have been no changeother changes in our internal controlscontrol over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act, for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2023 that hashave materially affected, or isare reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls

All control systems have inherent limitations including the realities that judgements in decision making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of the controls. Because of such limitations, there is a risk that material misstatements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.35

31


PART II—II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

Fromtime to time, we may become involved in litigation or other legal proceedings. As of June 30, 2023, we are not currently a party to any litigation or legal proceedings arising from the ordinary course of business. For additional information regarding legal proceedings, if any, see Note 10 “Commitments and Contingencies—Legal Proceedings” to our unaudited interim financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We believe there are currently no pending legal proceedings to which we or our property are subject that in the opinion of our management, are probable tocould have a material adverse effect on our business. Regardless of outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition,position, results of operations and prospects because of defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources and other factors.or cash flows.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, as well astogether with all of the other information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including our financial statements and the related notes thereto and the section of this Quarterly Report titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”Operations,” before deciding to invest in our common stock. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties that we are unaware of, or that we currently believe are not material, may also become important factors that affect us. We cannot assure you make an investment decision. The occurrence ofthat any of the events or developments describeddiscussed below could harmwill not occur. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, prospects, operating results and financial condition results of operations and prospects. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial also may impair our business operations. As a result,could suffer materially. In such event, the markettrading price of our common stock could decline and you maymight lose all or part of your investment.

Summary Risk Factors

An investment in our common stock involves various risks, and prospective investors are urged to carefully consider the matters discussed in the section titled “Risk Factors” prior to making an investment in our common stock. TheThese risks described below are not intended to be exhaustive and are not the only risks facing the Company. New risk factors can emerge from time to time, and it is not possible to predict the impact that any factor or combination of factors may have on our business, prospects, financial condition or results of operations.

Risks Related to Talaris’ Strategic Alternative Process

Failure to complete, or delays in completing, the proposed Merger with Tourmaline could materially and adversely affect Talaris’ results of operations, business, financial results and/or stock price.

In February 2023, Talaris announced that it intended to conduct a comprehensive review of strategic alternatives for the company and its assets. Talaris undertook a comprehensive review of strategic alternatives, including identifying and reviewing potential candidates for a merger.

On June 22, 2023, Talaris entered into an agreement and plan of merger and reorganization (the "Merger Agreement") with Terrain Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Talaris (“Merger Sub”), and Tourmaline Bio, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Tourmaline”), pursuant to which, among other matters, and subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub will merge with and into Tourmaline, with Tourmaline continuing as a wholly owned subsidiary of Talaris and the surviving corporation of the merger (the “Merger”).Subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, at the closing of the Merger and related transactions, (a) each then-outstanding share of Tourmaline common stock (including shares of Tourmaline common stock issued upon conversion of Tourmaline preferred stock and shares of Tourmaline common stock issued in a concurrent financing transaction, whereby Tourmaline agreed to sell shares of Tourmaline common stock for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $75,000,000 immediately prior to the closing of the Merger) will be converted into the right to receive a number of shares of Talaris common stock calculated in accordance with the Merger Agreement and (b) each then-outstanding option to purchase Tourmaline common stock will be converted into an option to purchase Talaris common stock, subject to adjustment as set forth in the Merger Agreement.

The closing of the Merger is subject to approval by the stockholders of Talaris and Tourmaline as well as other customary closing conditions. If the Merger is completed, the business of Tourmaline will continue as the business of the combined company. Any failure to satisfy a required condition to closing may prevent, delay or otherwise materially and adversely affect the completion of the Merger, which could materially and adversely affect Talaris’ results of operations, business, financial results and/or stock price. Talaris cannot predict with certainty whether or when any of the required closing conditions will be satisfied or if another uncertainty may arise and cannot assure you that the proposed Merger will be successfully consummated or that Talaris will be able to successfully consummate the proposed Merger as currently contemplated under the Merger Agreement or at all.

Risks related to the failure to consummate, or delay in consummating, the proposed Merger with Tourmaline include, but are not limited to, the following:

Talaris would not realize any or all of the potential benefits of the Merger, which could have a negative effect on Talaris’ results of operations, business or stock price;

under some circumstances, Talaris may be required to pay a termination fee to Tourmaline of $5 million, plus expense reimbursement of up to $500,000;

Talaris would remain liable for significant transaction costs, including legal, accounting, financial advisory and other costs relating to the Merger regardless of whether the Merger is consummated;

32


the trading price of Talaris’ common stock may decline to the extent that the current market price for Talaris’ stock reflects a market assumption that the Merger will be completed;

the attention of Talaris’ management and employees may have been diverted to the Merger rather than to Talaris’ historical operations and the pursuit of other opportunities that could have been beneficial to Talaris;

Talaris could be subject to litigation related to any failure to complete the Merger;

Talaris could potentially lose key personnel during the pendency of the Merger; and

under the Merger Agreement, Talaris is subject to certain customary restrictions on the conduct of Talaris’ business prior to completing the Merger, which restrictions could adversely affect Talaris’ ability to conduct Talaris’ business as Talaris otherwise would have done if Talaris was not subject to these restrictions.

The occurrenceWe have incurred net losses every year since our inception and have no source of any of these events individually or in combination could materiallyproduct revenue. We expect to continue to incur significant operating losses and adversely affect Talaris’ results of operations,may never become profitable.

Our business and Talaris’ stock price.

If Talaris does not successfully consummate the Merger or another strategic transaction, the Talaris board may decide to pursue a dissolution and liquidation of Talaris. In such an event, the amount of cash available for distribution to Talaris’ stockholders will depend heavilyis highly dependent on the timingsuccess of such liquidationTOUR006 as well as the amountany other potential future product candidates. If we are unable to successfully complete clinical development of, cash thatobtain regulatory approval for, or commercialize, TOUR006 or any other potential future product candidates, or if we experience delays in doing so, our business will be materially harmed.

We will need significant additional capital to proceed with development and commercialization of TOUR006 and any potential future product candidates and our other operations. We may not be reserved for commitmentsable to access sufficient capital on acceptable terms, if at all, and, contingent liabilities, as a result, we may be required to which Talaris can give you no assurance.

There can be no assurance that the Merger will be completed. If the Merger is not completed, the Talaris board may decide to pursue a dissolution and liquidation of Talaris. In such an event, the amount of cash available for distribution to Talaris’ stockholders will depend heavily on the timingdelay, scale back or discontinue development of such decisionproduct candidates or other operations.

We have a limited operating history and ultimately, such liquidation, sinceno history of commercializing products, which may make it difficult for an investor to evaluate the amountsuccess of cash available for distribution continuesour business to decreasedate and to assess our future viability.

We will incur additional costs and increased demands upon management as Talaris funds its operations while pursuing the Merger. In addition, if the Talaris board were to approve and recommend, and Talaris’ stockholders were to approve, a dissolution and liquidation of the company, Talaris would be required under Delaware corporate law to pay Talaris’ outstanding obligations, as well as to make reasonable provision for contingent and unknown obligations, prior to making any distributions in liquidation to stockholders. Talaris’ commitments and contingent liabilities may include obligations under Talaris’ employment and related agreements or policies with certain employees that provide for severance and other payments following a termination of employment occurring for various reasons, including a change in control of the company, litigation against Talaris, and other various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business, and other unexpected and/or contingent liabilities. As a result of this requirement, a portioncomplying with the laws and regulations appliable to public companies.

We may not be able to obtain and maintain the relationships with third parties that are necessary to develop, commercialize and manufacture TOUR006 and any potential future product candidates.

We rely completely on contract development and manufacturing organization (“CDMOs”) for the manufacture and testing of Talaris’ assets would need to be reserved pending the resolution of such obligations.

In addition, Talaris may beTOUR006 and any potential future product candidates under current good manufacturing practices (“cGMP”), and we are subject to litigation or other claims related tomany manufacturing risks, any of which could substantially increase our costs and limit supply of any potential product candidates and any future products.

Our manufacturing and testing of bulk drug substance for TOUR006 currently takes place in China through a dissolutionglobal CDMO with facilities in China and liquidation of Talaris. If a dissolution and liquidation were to be pursued,around the Talaris board, in consultation with Talaris’ advisors, would need to evaluate these matters and make a determination about a reasonable amount to reserve. Accordingly, holders of Talaris’ common stock could lose all or aworld. A significant portion of their investmentdisruption in the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding upoperation of the company. A liquidation would bemanufacturing facility in China, a lengthy and uncertain process with no assurance of any value ever being returned to Talaris’ stockholders.

Talaris is substantially dependent on Talaris’ remaining employees to facilitate the consummation of the Merger.

Talaris’ ability to consummate a strategic transaction depends upon its ability to retain its remaining employees required to consummate such a transaction, the loss of whose services maytrade war or political unrest could materially adversely impact the ability to consummate such transaction. In February and April 2023, Talaris undertook organizational restructurings that significantly reduced its workforce in order to conserve its capital resources. As of June 30, 2023, Talaris had only four full-time employees. Talaris’ ability to successfully complete the Merger depends in large part on Talaris’ ability to retain these remaining personnel. Despite Talaris’ efforts to retain these employees, one or more may terminate their employment with Talaris on short notice. Talaris’ cash conservation activities may yield other unintended consequences, such as reduced employee morale, which may cause remaining employees to seek alternative employment. The loss of the services of certain employees could potentially harm Talaris’ ability to consummate the Merger, to run Talaris’ day-to-day business operations, as well as to fulfill Talaris’ reporting obligations as a public company.

Even if Talaris is successful in completing a strategic transaction, Talaris may be exposed to other operational and financial risks.

Although there can be no assurance that a strategic transaction will result from the process Talaris has undertaken to identify and evaluate strategic alternatives, the negotiation and consummation of any such transaction will require significant time on the part of Talaris’ management, and the diversion of management’s attention may disrupt Talaris’ business.

The negotiation and consummation of any such transaction may also require more time or greater cash resources than Talaris anticipates and exposes Talaris to other operational and financial risks, including:

increased near-term and long-term expenditures;

33


exposure to unknown liabilities;

higher than expected transaction costs;

difficulty and cost in combining the operations and personnel of any acquired business with Talaris’ operations and personnel;

impairment of relationships with third parties of any acquired business due to changes in management and ownership;

inability to retain key employees of Talaris or any acquired business; and

possibility of future litigation.

Any of the foregoing risks could have a material adverse effect on Talaris’affect our business, financial condition and prospects.results of operations.

If Talaris does36


We may seek to establish business development arrangements (“BD Arrangements”), and, if we are not complete the Merger, Talaris may face substantial competition for attractive counterparties for any proposed strategic transactions.

There can be no assurance that the Merger will be completed. If the Merger is not completed, the Talaris board may decideable to pursue an alternative strategic transaction. Talaris may face substantial competition for attractive counterparties for any proposed strategic transactions. For example, there may be many other biotech and pharmaceutical companies that halt development of their programs and instead choose to pursue strategic transactions like the ones Talaris has been exploring in connection with its strategic review process. These companies may possess greater financial and managerial resources than Talaris does, and theyestablish them on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, we may have more attractive product candidates, intellectual property or other assets. As a result, these other companies may prove to be more attractive than Talaris to counterparties pursuing strategic transactions. There can be no assurance that its strategic review process will result in Talaris pursuing a transaction, or that any transaction, if pursued, will be completed on terms favorable to Talarisalter our development and its stockholders.commercialization plans.

Talaris has never paid

TOUR006 and other than in connection with the Merger, does not intend to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future, so any returns will be limited to the value of Talaris’ capital stock.

Talaris has never paid cash dividends on any of its capital stock. Talaris currently anticipates that it will retain future earnings and does not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends for the foreseeable future, other than the special cash dividend contemplated in connection with the Merger. In addition, Talaris may enter into agreements that prohibit it from paying cash dividends without prior written consent from Talaris’ contracting parties, or with other terms prohibiting or limiting the amount of dividends that may be declared or paid on Talaris common stock. Any return to stockholders will therefore be limited to the appreciation of their stock, which may never occur.

Talaris may become involved in litigation, including securities class action litigation, which could divert management’s attention and harm Talaris’ business, and insurance coverage may not be sufficient to cover all costs and damages.

In the past, litigation, including securities class action litigation, has often followed certain significant business transactions, such as the sale of a company or announcement of any other strategic transaction, or the announcement of negative events, such as negative results from clinical trials. These events may also result in investigations by the SEC. Talaris may be exposed to such litigation even if no wrongdoing occurred. Litigation is usually expensive and diverts management’s attention and resources, which could adversely affect Talaris’ business and cash resources and Talaris’ ability to consummate a potential strategic transaction or the ultimate value its stockholders receive in any such transaction.

Risks Related to Talaris’ Business and Product Candidates

Risks Related to Clinical Development

Should Talaris resume the development of biopharmaceutical product candidates, its business would substantially depend upon the successful development and regulatory approval of a biopharmaceutical product candidate. If Talaris is unable to obtain regulatory approval for any such candidate, its business may be materially harmed.

Talaris currently has no products approved for sale and has historically invested substantially all of its efforts and financial resources in the development of its Facilitated Allo-HSCT Therapy, specifically in FCR001. Should Talaris resume development of biopharmaceutical candidates, successful development and ultimate regulatory approval of a product candidate for any potential indications would be critical to the future success of its business. Talaris would need to raise sufficient funds for, and successfully enroll and complete, clinical development for a product candidate.

There is no guarantee that any of product candidate Talaris may choose to develop will proceed in clinical development or achieve regulatory approval. The process for obtaining marketing approval for any product candidate is very long and risky and there will be significant challenges for Talaris to address in order to obtain marketing approval as planned or, if at all. The potential regulatory approval of any product candidate Talaris may develop is subject to a number of risks, including the following:

34


successful initiation and completion of clinical trials;

successful patient enrollment in clinical trials;

successful data from clinical trials that supports an acceptable risk-benefit profile of Talaris product candidates in the intended populations; and

receipt and maintenance of marketing approvals from applicable regulatory authorities.

In addition, because Talaris has limited financial and personnel resources and is currently placing significant focus on pursuing strategic alternatives, Talaris may forgo or delay pursuit of opportunities with otherour future product candidates and indications that later prove to have greater commercial potential. Talaris’ resource allocation decisions may cause it to fail to capitalize on viable commercial products or profitable market opportunities. In addition, the resources spent on current and future initiatives may not yield successful outcomes.

Many of these risks are beyond the control of Talaris, including the risks related to clinical development and the regulatory submission process. If Talaris is unable to develop and receive regulatory approval for any product candidate it chooses to pursue for the indications Talaris are developing it for, or if Talaris experiences delays as a result of any of these risks or otherwise, its business could be materially harmed.

Clinical drug development involves a lengthy and expensive process with an uncertain outcome. Should Talaris resume the development of biopharmaceutical product candidates, the inability to successfully and timely conductmust undergo rigorous clinical trials and obtainbefore seeking regulatory approval for Talaris’ product candidates would substantially harm Talaris’ business.

Talaris cannot commercialize product candidates in the United States without first obtaining regulatory approval from the FDA; similarly, Talaris cannot commercialize product candidates outside of the United States without obtaining regulatory approval from comparable foreign regulatory authorities. Before obtaining regulatory approvals, for the commercial sale of any product candidate for a target indication, Talaris must demonstrate with substantial evidence gathered in preclinical studies and clinical trials that the product candidate is safe and effective for Talaris for that target indication and that the manufacturing facilities, processes and controls are adequate with respect to such product candidate to assure safety, purity and potency.

Clinical testing is expensive and can take many years to complete, and its outcome is inherently uncertain. Failure can occurmay be delayed, suspended or terminated at any time during the clinical trial process. Product candidates in later stagesfor many reasons, any of which could delay or prevent regulatory approval and, if approval is granted, commercialization of our product candidates.

If clinical trials mayof TOUR006 or any potential future product candidates fail to show the desiredinitiate, complete, or produce positive results or fail to demonstrate safety and efficacy traits despite having progressed through preclinical studies and clinical trials.

The time required to obtain approval by the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities is unpredictable but typically takes many years following the commencement of preclinical studies and clinical trials and depends upon numerous factors, including the study designs and substantial discretionsatisfaction of the regulatory authorities. In addition, approval policies, regulations,Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) or the type and amount of clinical data necessarycomparable health authorities or sufficiently to gain approvaldemonstrate differentiation from other approved therapies or therapies in development, we may change duringincur additional costs or experience delays in completing, or ultimately be unable to complete, the course of a product candidate’s clinical development and may vary among jurisdictions. Talaris has not obtained regulatory approval for any product candidate and it is possible that none of Talaris’ existing product candidates or any future product candidates will ever obtain regulatory approval.

Should Talaris resume the development of biopharmaceutical product candidates, Talaris’ product candidates could fail to receive regulatory approval from the FDA or a comparable foreign regulatory authority for many reasons, including:

disagreement with the design or conduct of Talaris’ clinical trials;

failure to demonstrate to the satisfaction of regulatory agencies that its product candidate, is safe and effective, or has a positive benefit/risk profile for its proposed indications;

failure of clinical trials to meet the level of statistical significance required for approval;

disagreement with Talaris’ interpretation of data from preclinical studies or clinical trials;

the insufficiency of data collected from clinical trials of Talaris’ product candidates to support the submission and filing of a Biologics License Application (“BLA”) or other submission or to obtain regulatory approval;

failure to obtain approval of Talaris’ manufacturing processes, Talaris’ own manufacturing facility, or facilities of third-party manufacturers with whom Talaris may in the future contract for clinical and commercial supplies; or

changes in the approval policies or regulations that render Talaris’ preclinical and clinical data insufficient for approval.

This lengthy approval process, as well as the unpredictability of future clinical trial results, may result in Talaris’ failing to obtain regulatory approval to market Talaris’ product candidates, which would significantly harm Talaris’ business, results of operations and prospects. The FDA or a comparable foreign regulatory authority may require more information, including additional preclinical or clinical data to support approval, which may delay or prevent approval and Talaris’ commercialization plans, or Talaris may decide to abandon the development program. If Talaris was to obtain approval, regulatory authorities may approve any of Talaris’

35


product candidates for fewer or more limited indications than Talaris requests (including failing to approve the most commercially promising indications), may grant approval contingent on the performance of costly post-marketing clinical studies, or may approve a product candidate with a label that does not include the labeling claims necessary or desirable for the successful commercialization of thatour product candidate.candidates.

Should Talaris resume the development of biopharmaceutical product candidates,

If we experience delays or difficulties in the enrollment of patients in clinical trials, development of TOUR006, or any potential future product candidates, may be delayed or prevented, which would have a material adverse effect on Talaris’our business.

Even if we obtain approval to market TOUR006 or other potential future product candidates, these products may become subject to unfavorable pricing regulations, reimbursement practices from third-party payors or healthcare reform initiatives in the United States (“U.S.”) and abroad, which could harm our business.

We expect to expand our clinical development, manufacturing and regulatory capabilities and potentially implement sales, marketing and distribution capabilities, and as a result, we may encounter difficulties in managing our growth, which could disrupt our operations.

Healthcare reform may negatively impact our ability to profitably sell TOUR006 and any potential future product candidates, if approved.

Our international operations may expose us to business, regulatory, political, operational, financial, pricing and reimbursement risks associated with doing business outside of the U.S.

Product liability lawsuits against us could cause us to incur substantial liabilities and to limit commercialization of any products that we may develop.

Our relationships with healthcare providers, customers and third-party payors will be subject to applicable anti-kickback, fraud and abuse, transparency and other healthcare laws and regulations, which, if violated, could expose us to criminal sanctions, civil penalties, contractual damages, reputational harm, administrative burdens and diminished profits and future earnings.

Our business could be materially and adversely affected in the future by the effects of disease outbreaks, epidemics and pandemics.

Our ability to use our US net operating loss carryforwards and certain other U.S. tax attributes may be limited.

We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. If we are unable to remediate these material weaknesses, or if we identify additional material weaknesses in the future or otherwise fail to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to accurately or timely report our financial condition or results of operations, which may adversely affect our business.

37


Our internal control over financial reporting may not meet the standards required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and failure to achieve and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, could have a material adverse effect on our business and share price.

Risks Related to Our Financial Condition and Capital Needs

We have a limited operating history and no history of commercializing products, which may make it difficult for an investor to evaluate the success of our business to date and to assess our future viability.

We are a biotechnology company with a limited operating history and a single product candidate, TOUR006, in development to date. Legacy Tourmaline was formed in 2021 and commenced operations in 2022. To date, we have not yet demonstrated our ability to successfully complete pivotal clinical trials, obtain regulatory approvals, manufacture a product on a commercial scale or arrange for a third-party to do so on our behalf, or conduct sales and marketing activities necessary for successful commercialization, and we may not be successful in doing so in the future. Consequently, any predictions about our future success or viability may not be as accurate as they could be if we had a longer operating history or a history of successfully developing and commercializing products.

In Februaryaddition, as a business with a limited operating history, we may encounter unforeseen expenses, technical or regulatory challenges, or unanticipated delays in development timelines. We will eventually need to transition from a company with a clinical development focus to a company, if TOUR006 or any potential future product candidates are approved, capable of supporting commercial activities. We may not be successful in such a transition.

We have incurred net losses every year since our inception and have no source of product revenue. We expect to continue to incur significant operating losses and may never become profitable.

We have no products approved for commercial sale and have not generated any revenue from product sales to date. Legacy Tourmaline has incurred losses in each year since it commenced operations.

We expect to continue to incur significant research and development (“R&D”) costs and other expenses related to our ongoing operations for the foreseeable future, particularly to fund R&D of, and seek regulatory approvals for, TOUR006 and any potential future product candidates. Legacy Tourmaline expects to continue to incur significant operating losses in 2023 Talaris announcedand over the next several years as our research, development, manufacturing, preclinical study, clinical trial and related activities grow. We expect our accumulated deficit will also increase in future periods. The size of our future net losses will depend, in part, on the amount of our expenses and our ability to generate revenue. Our prior losses and expected future losses have had, and will continue to have, an adverse effect on our stockholders’ deficit and working capital.

In addition, we will not be able to generate product revenue unless and until TOUR006 or any potential future product candidates successfully completes clinical trials, receives regulatory approval and is successfully commercialized or generates revenues through business development activities. We do not expect to receive product revenue from our product candidates for a number of years, if ever.

Our ability to generate any product revenue from TOUR006 and any potential future product candidates also depends on a number of additional factors, including our ability, or the ability of any potential future third-party partner, to successfully:

complete research and clinical development of current and future product candidates and obtain regulatory approval for those product candidates;

establish and maintain supply and manufacturing relationships, and ensure adequate, scaled up and legally compliant manufacturing of bulk drug substances and drug products to maintain sufficient supply;

38


launch and commercialize TOUR006 or any potential future product candidates for which marketing approval is obtained, if any, and, if launched independently by us without a partner, successfully establish a sales force and marketing and distribution infrastructure;

demonstrate the necessary safety data (and, if accelerated approval is obtained, verify the clinical benefit) post-approval to ensure continued regulatory approval;

obtain coverage and adequate product reimbursement from third-party payors, including government payors, for any approved products;

achieve market acceptance for any approved products;

enter into collaboration, partnering, licensing, or other similar arrangements on economically favorable terms;

establish, maintain, protect and enforce our intellectual property rights; and/or

attract, hire and retain qualified personnel.

Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with pharmaceutical product development, including that TOUR006 and any potential future product candidates may not advance through development or be approved for commercial sale, we are unable to predict if or when we will generate product revenue or achieve or maintain profitability.

Even if we successfully complete development and obtain health authority approval for commercialization for any product candidates that we take forward, we anticipate incurring significant costs associated with launching and commercializing any products. If we fail to become profitable or do not sustain profitability on a continuing basis, we may be unable to continue our operations at planned levels and be forced to reduce or cease operations.

Our business is highly dependent on the success of TOUR006 as well as any other potential future product candidates. If we are unable to successfully complete clinical development of, obtain regulatory approval for, or commercialize, TOUR006 or any other potential future product candidates, or if we experience delays in doing so, our business will be materially harmed.

Our future success and ability to generate revenue from TOUR006 or any potential future product candidates, which we do not expect will occur for several years, if ever, is dependent on our ability to successfully develop, obtain regulatory approval for and commercialize one or more product candidates. We have identified thyroid eye disease (“TED”) as the lead indication for TOUR006. We submitted an investigational new drug application (“IND”) in the U.S. to support initiation of a Phase 2b trial of TOUR006 in first-line TED, which IND was cleared by the FDA in August 2023. In September, 2023, we initiated this study. In addition, our plans to initiate an open-label basket study in additional TED patient cohorts to further inform the utility of TOUR006 for the treatment of additional TED subpopulations. If TOUR006 encounters undesirable safety signals, insufficient efficacy results, development delays, regulatory issues or other problems, our development plans and business would be significantly harmed.

Our second indication for TOUR006 is expected to be atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (“ASCVD”). TOUR006 for ASCVD is in an earlier stage of development and will require substantial additional investment for clinical development, regulatory review and approval in one or more jurisdictions.

39


We will need significant additional capital to proceed with the development and commercialization of TOUR006 and any potential future product candidates and our other operations. We may not be able to access sufficient capital on acceptable terms, if at all, and, as a result, we may be required to delay, scale back or discontinue development of such product candidates or other operations.

Our operations have consumed substantial amounts of cash since inception, and we will require substantial additional capital to finance our operations and pursue our product development strategy both in the short- and the long-term, and the amount of funding we will need depends on many factors, including:

the rate of progress in the development of TOUR006 and our other potential future product candidates;

the initiation, progress, timing, delays, costs and results of preclinical studies and clinical trials for TOUR006 and any potential future product candidates;

the number and development requirements of product candidates that we may pursue;

the outcome, timing and cost of seeking and obtaining regulatory approvals from the FDA and comparable foreign health authorities, including the potential for such authorities to require that we perform more studies than those that we currently expect;

the cost to establish, maintain, expand, enforce and defend the scope of our intellectual property portfolio, including the amount and timing of any payments we may be required to make, or that we may receive, in connection with licensing, preparing, filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing any patents or other intellectual property rights;

the cost and timing of selecting and auditing a manufacturing site for later-stage clinical and commercial-scale manufacturing;

the cost and timing of performing manufacturing process validation sufficient to meet regulatory expectations and requirements;

the effect of products that may compete with TOUR006 and any potential future product candidates or other market developments;

market acceptance of any approved product candidates, including product pricing and product reimbursement by third-party payors;

the cost of potentially acquiring, licensing or investing in additional businesses, products, product candidates and technologies; and

the cost of establishing sales, marketing and distribution capabilities for TOUR006 and any potential future product candidates for which we may receive regulatory approval and that we decide to commercialize ourselves or in collaboration with partners.

We believe that our working capital will be sufficient to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements for more than twelve months from the date of issuance of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Moreover, based on our current development plans and related assumptions, we believe our cash position is sufficient to fund our key programs through 2026. We have based these estimates on plans and assumptions that may prove to be insufficient or inaccurate (for example, with respect to anticipated costs, timing or success of certain activities), and we could utilize our available capital resources sooner than we currently expect. In addition, our forecast of the period of time through which our financial resources will be adequate to support our operations is a forward-looking statement that involves risks and uncertainties, and actual results could vary materially as a result of a number of factors.

We plan to finance our future cash needs through public or private equity or debt offerings, BD Arrangements or a combination of these potential financing sources. For example, we may seek BD Arrangements in the future to facilitate clinical development that requires significantly more capital and resources that may otherwise not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all, such as large cardiovascular outcome trials of TOUR006 in patients with

40


ASCVD. Additional capital may not be available in sufficient amounts, on reasonable terms or when we need it, if at all. In addition, our ability to obtain financing may be adversely impacted by potential worsening global economic conditions and the disruptions to, and volatility in, the credit and financial markets in the U.S. and worldwide resulting from geopolitical tensions, such as the ongoing war in Ukraine and hostilities in the Middle East, global pandemics, inflation, rising interest rates, and liquidity concerns at, and failures of, banks and other financial institutions. The global economy, including credit and financial markets, has experienced extreme volatility and disruptions, including severely diminished liquidity and credit availability, declines in economic growth, increases in inflation rates, higher interest rates and uncertainty about economic stability. If the financial market disruptions and economic slowdown deepen or persist, we may not be able to access additional capital on favorable terms, or at all, which could in the future negatively affect our financial condition and our ability to pursue our business strategy.

If adequate funds are not available from public or private equity or debt offerings, or BD Arrangements on acceptable terms when needed, in order to continue the development of TOUR006 or any of our potential future product candidates we may need to:

seek strategic alliances for R&D programs when we otherwise would not, at an earlier stage than we would otherwise desire or on terms less favorable than might otherwise be available; or

enter into BD Arrangements that could require us to relinquish, or license, on potentially unfavorable terms, our rights to intellectual property, product candidates or products that we otherwise would develop or seek to commercialize ourselves.

We may not be able to raise adequate additional capital on a timely basis, on acceptable terms or at all. If we are unable to do so, we may need to significantly delay, scale back or discontinue development of or abandon TOUR006 or any potential future product candidates, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects, or we may be required to cease operations altogether.

We will incur additional costs and increased demands upon management as a result of complying with the laws and regulations appliable to public companies.

We will incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses as a public company that we did not incur as a private company, including costs associated with public company reporting obligations under the Exchange Act. Our management team consists of the executive officers of Legacy Tourmaline prior to the Merger, some of whom have not previously managed and operated a public company. These executive officers and other personnel will need to devote substantial time to gaining expertise related to public company reporting requirements and compliance with applicable laws and regulations to ensure that we comply with all of these requirements. Any changes we make to comply with these obligations may not be sufficient to allow us to satisfy our obligations as a public company on a timely basis, or at all. These reporting requirements, rules and regulations, coupled with the increase in potential litigation exposure associated with being a public company, could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on the board of directors or onboard committees or to serve as executive officers, or to obtain certain types of insurance, including directors’ and officers’ insurance, on acceptable terms.

Once we are no longer an emerging growth company, a smaller reporting company or otherwise no longer qualify for applicable exemptions, we will be subject to additional laws and regulations affecting public companies that will increase our costs and the demands on management and could harm our operating results.

We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, which requires, among other things, that we file with the SEC, annual, quarterly and current reports with respect to our business and financial condition as well as other disclosure and corporate governance requirements. However, as an emerging growth company we may take advantage of exemptions from various requirements such as an exemption from the requirement to have our independent auditors attest to our internal control over financial reporting under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as well as an exemption from the “say on pay” voting requirements pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act. After we no longer qualify as an emerging growth company, we may still qualify as a “smaller reporting company” which may allow us to take advantage of some of the same exemptions from disclosure requirements including not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and reduced

41


disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements. Even after we no longer qualify as an emerging growth company, we expect to still qualify as a “smaller reporting company,” as such term is defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act, in at least the near term, which will allow us to take advantage of many of the same exemptions from disclosure requirements, including not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in periodic reports and proxy statements. Once we are no longer an emerging growth company, a smaller reporting company or otherwise qualify for these exemptions, we will be required to comply with these additional legal and regulatory requirements applicable to public companies and will incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses to do so. If we are not able to comply with the requirements in a timely manner or at all, our financial condition or the market price of our common stock may be harmed. For example, if we or our independent auditor identifies deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses, we could face additional costs to remedy those deficiencies, the market price of our stock could decline or we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by the SEC or other regulatory authorities, which would require additional financial and management resources.

Risks Related to Our Dependence on Third Parties

We may not be able to obtain and maintain the relationships with third parties that are necessary to develop, commercialize and manufacture TOUR006 and any potential future product candidates.

We expect to depend on third parties, including contract research organizations (“CROs”), clinical data management organizations, clinical investigators, and CDMOs and other third-party partners and service providers to support our development efforts, to conduct our clinical trials and certain aspects of our research and preclinical studies, to manufacture clinical and commercial-scale quantities of our drug substances and drug products under cGMP and to market, sell and distribute any products we successfully develop and for which we obtain regulatory approval. Any problems we experience with any of these third parties could delay the development, manufacturing or commercialization of TOUR006 or any potential future product candidates, which could harm our results of operations.

We cannot guarantee that we or, as applicable, any of our partners will be able to successfully negotiate agreements for, and maintain relationships with, third-party partners and service providers on favorable terms, if at all. If we or any of our partners are unable to obtain and maintain these agreements, we may not be able to clinically develop, manufacture, obtain regulatory approvals for or commercialize TOUR006 or any potential future product candidates, which will, in turn, adversely affect our business. If we or any of our partners need to enter into alternative arrangements, it could delay our product development and, if applicable, commercialization activities and such alternative arrangements may not be available on terms acceptable to us.

We expect to continue to expend substantial time and effort to enter into relationships with third parties and, if we successfully enter into such relationships, to manage these relationships. In addition, our reliance on these third parties for development activities reduces our control over these activities but does not relieve us of our responsibilities. For example, we remain responsible for ensuring that our clinical trials are conducted in accordance with the general investigational plan and protocols for the trial and we remain responsible for ensuring that manufacturing activities are conducted under cGMP. However, we cannot control the amount or timing of resources our partners will devote to our programs, TOUR006 or potential future product candidates, and we cannot guarantee that these parties will fulfill their obligations to us under these arrangements in a timely fashion, if at all. If these third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties, meet expected deadlines or conduct their clinical trials or other R&D activities in accordance with regulatory requirements, we will not be able to obtain, or may be delayed in obtaining, marketing approvals for TOUR006 or any potential future product candidates and will not be able to, or may be delayed in our efforts to, successfully commercialize any approved products. In addition, we base our expense accruals related to clinical trials on our estimates of the services received and efforts expended pursuant to contracts with multiple research institutions and CROs that conduct and manage clinical trials on our behalf and, if their estimates are not accurate, it could negatively affect the accuracy of our financial statements.

42


Any agreements we have or may enter into with third-party partners and service providers may give rise to disputes regarding the rights and obligations of the parties. Disagreements could develop over contract interpretation, rights to ownership or use of intellectual property, the scope and direction of our programs, the approach for regulatory approvals or commercialization strategy. Any disputes or commercial conflicts could lead to the termination of Talaris’ FREEDOM-1our agreements, delay progress of our product development programs, compromise our ability to renew agreements or obtain future agreements, lead to the loss of intellectual property rights, result in increased financial obligations for us or result in costly and FREEDOM-2time-consuming arbitration or litigation.

We rely completely on CDMOs for the manufacture and testing of TOUR006 and any potential future product candidates under cGMP, and we are subject to many manufacturing risks, any of which could substantially increase our costs and limit supply of any potential product candidates and any future products.

We require the services of third-party CDMOs to provide process development, analytical method development, formulation development, and manufacturing. We do not have, and do not currently plan to acquire or develop, the facilities or capabilities to manufacture and test bulk drug substance or filled drug product for use in clinical trials evaluating FCR001or commercialization. As a result, we rely completely on CDMOs, which entails risks to which we would not be subject if we manufactured TOUR006 or any potential future product candidates or products ourselves, including risks related to reliance on third parties for availability of drug product to use in LDKT. This decision was primarily attributableour clinical trials and for regulatory compliance and quality assurance with respect to such drug product, the possibility of breach of the manufacturing agreement by third parties because of factors beyond our control (including a failure to manufacture TOUR006 and any potential future product candidates or any products we may eventually commercialize in accordance with our specifications) and the possibility of termination or nonrenewal of agreements by third parties, based on their own business priorities, at a time that is costly or damaging to us.

TOUR006 is a biologic, and the manufacture and testing of biologic products is complex, highly regulated and requires significant expertise and capital investment, including the development of advanced manufacturing techniques, process controls, and advanced analytical testing capability. As a result, the manufacture and testing of our product candidate is subject to many risks, including the following, some of which we may experience:

product loss or other negative consequences due to contamination, equipment failure, improper installation or operation of equipment, vendor or operator error, shortages of qualified personnel or improper delivery or storage conditions;

difficulties with product yields, quality control release testing, including challenges related to analytical method development and the qualification and implementation of those methods for release testing, which can delay availability of clinical trial materials;

challenges with long-term stability of our product candidate and products at reasonable and expected storage conditions;

challenges with comparability of product made following changes in the manufacturing process such as a change in the manufacturing facility, scale-up, changes in the storage container used for drug product, or other changes;

the negative consequences of failure to comply with strictly enforced federal, state and foreign regulations;

major deviations from normal manufacturing processes, which may result in reduced production yields, product defects and other supply disruptions;

the presence of microbial, viral or other contaminants discovered in our product candidate or in the manufacturing facilities in which it is made, which can necessitate closure of facilities for an extended period of time to investigate and eliminate the contamination;

the negative consequences of our CDMOs’ failure to be approved for commercial production following an audit by regulatory authorities, by us or by our partners;

Our CDMOs’ changing strategies and business priorities, which can affect the availability of facilities where we intend to manufacture our product candidate; and

43


Our CDMOs’ manufacturing facilities being adversely affected by labor, raw material and component shortages, turnover of qualified staff or financial difficulties of their owners or operators, including as a result of natural disasters, power failures, local political unrest or other factors.

We cannot ensure that issues relating to the pacemanufacture or testing of our product candidates, such as those described above, will not occur or continue to occur in the future. If we or our CDMOs experience any such issues there could be a shortage of drug substance or drug product for use in our clinical trials, which could delay clinical and regulatory timelines significantly and have an adverse effect on our business.

In addition, to date, TOUR006 has been manufactured and tested by our drug substance and drug product CDMOs solely for clinical trials. We intend to continue to use CDMOs for these purposes, and also for the supply of larger quantities that may be required to conduct accelerated or expanded early clinical trials or larger, later clinical trials and for commercialization if we advance any of our product candidates through regulatory approval and to commercialization. These manufacturers may not have sufficient manufacturing capacity and may not be able to scale up the production of drug substance or drug product in the quantities we need and at the level of quality required in a timely or effective manner, or at all. In particular, there is increased competition in the biotechnology industry for CDMO manufacturing slots and other capabilities generally, which has had, and may continue to have, a negative impact on the availability of manufacturing capacity and therefore our ability to supply clinical trial materials for planned, ongoing or expanded clinical trials or commercialization.

The scale up and validation of the manufacturing processes in the CDMOs’ facilities to manufacture larger quantities or different formats such as a pre-filled syringe involve complex activities and coordination. Scale up and process validation activities entail risks such as process reproducibility and robustness, stability of in-process intermediates, product quality consistency and other technical challenges. We may be unable to scale up or validate our manufacturing processes, which can be expensive and time-consuming and could delay the initiation or completion of our clinical trials.

Similarly, we or our CDMOs may make changes to our manufacturing processes at various points in product development for many reasons, including changing manufacturing facilities, scaling up, facility fit, raw material or component availability, improving process robustness and reproducibility, decreasing processing times, changing the storage container, or others. In some circumstances, we may fail to demonstrate that the product from the new process is comparable to product from the prior process and we may be required to perform additional bridging studies, animal or human studies to demonstrate that the product used in earlier clinical trials are comparable to the product we intend to use in later trials or later stages of an ongoing trial. These efforts are expensive and there is no assurance that they will be successful, which could impact our ability to continue or initiate clinical trials in a timely manner, or at all, and could require the conduct of additional clinical trials.

Any future adverse developments affecting manufacturing operations or the scale up or validation of manufacturing processes for TOUR006 or any of our future product candidates may result in shipment delays, lot failures, clinical trial delays or discontinuations, or, if we are commercializing products, inventory shortages, product withdrawals or recalls or other interruptions in supply. We may also have to record inventory write-offs and incur other charges and expenses for drug substance or drug product that fail to meet specifications or cannot be used before its expiration date. In addition, for out of specification materials, we may need to undertake costly remediation efforts or manufacture new batches at considerable cost and time delays or, in the longer run, seek more expensive manufacturing alternatives.

We currently have a single source of supply for our drug substance and for our drug product. Single sourcing minimizes our leverage with our CDMOs, who may take advantage of our reliance on them to increase the pricing of their manufacturing services or require us to change our intended manufacturing plans based on their strategies and priorities. Single sourcing also imposes a risk of interruption or delays in supply in the event of manufacturing, quality or compliance difficulties and/or other difficulties in timely supplying us with materials. We do not currently have arrangements in place for redundant supply for drug substance or drug product. If one of our suppliers fails or refuses to supply us for any reason or we otherwise choose to engage a new supplier for TOUR006 or any of our future product candidates, including a second-source supplier to mitigate the risks of single-source supply, it may take a significant amount of time and cost to implement and execute the necessary technology transfer to, and qualification of, a new supplier. The FDA or comparable foreign health authority must approve manufacturers of commercial drug substance and drug product. If there are any delays in qualifying new suppliers or facilities or a new supplier is unable to meet the requirements of the FDA or comparable foreign health authority for approval of production of our commercial supply, there could be a shortage of drug substance or drug product with respect to the affected product candidates.

44


If our CDMOs are unable to source certain raw materials and components from their supplier and if they must obtain such materials from a different supplier, additional testing, and regulatory approvals, may be required, which may negatively impact manufacturing timelines. Any significant delay in the acquisition or decrease in the availability of these materials, components or other items, or failure to successfully qualify alternative materials or components, could considerably delay the manufacture of our product candidates, which could adversely impact the timing or completion of any ongoing and planned trials or the timing of regulatory approvals, if any, of our product candidates.

In addition, our CDMOs’ facilities and operations may be adversely affected by labor, raw material and component shortages, high turnover of staff and difficulties in hiring trained and qualified replacement staff and the operations of our CDMOs may be requisitioned, diverted or allocated by U.S. or foreign government orders such as under emergency, disaster and civil defense declarations. Changes in economic conditions, supply chain constraints, labor, raw material and component shortages and steps taken by governments and central banks could also lead to higher inflation than previously experienced or expected, which could, in turn, lead to an increase in costs.

If any CDMO with whom we contract fails to perform its obligations, we may be forced to manufacture the materials ourselves, for which we may not have the capabilities or resources, or enter into an agreement with a different CDMO, which we may not be able to do on reasonable terms, if at all. In either scenario, our clinical trials supply could be delayed significantly as we establish alternative supply sources. In some cases, the technical skills required to manufacture our products or product candidates may be unique or proprietary to the original CDMO and we may have difficulty, or there may be contractual restrictions prohibiting us from, transferring such skills to a back-up or alternate supplier, or we may be unable to transfer such skills at all. In addition, if we are required to change CDMOs for any reason, we will be required to verify that the new CDMO maintains facilities and procedures that comply with quality standards and with all applicable regulations. We would also need to verify, such as through a manufacturing comparability study, that any new manufacturing process will produce our product candidate according to the specifications previously submitted to the FDA or another regulatory authority. The delays associated with the verification of a new CDMO could negatively affect our ability to develop product candidates or commercialize our products in a timely manner or within budget. Furthermore, a CDMO may possess technology related to the manufacture of our product candidate that such CDMO owns independently. This would increase our reliance on such CDMO or require us to obtain a license from such CDMO in order to have another CDMO manufacture our product candidates.

Our manufacturing and testing of bulk drug substance for TOUR006 currently takes place in China through a global CDMO with facilities in China and around the world. A significant disruption in the operation of the manufacturing facility in China, a trade war or political unrest could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We currently contract manufacturing operations to third parties. TOUR006 bulk drug substance is manufactured by a third-party facility in China. TOUR006 drug product is manufactured in Austria and packaged in Germany. Any disruption in production or inability of our manufacturers in those countries to produce adequate quantities to meet our needs, whether as a result of a natural disaster or other causes, could impair our ability to operate our business on a day-to-day basis and to continue development of our product candidates. Furthermore, since bulk drug substance is produced in China, we are exposed to the possibility of product supply disruption and increased costs in the event of changes in the policies of the U.S. or Chinese governments, political unrest or unstable economic conditions in China. Any of these matters could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations. In addition, manufacturing interruptions or failure to comply with regulatory requirements by any of these manufacturers could significantly delay clinical development of potential products and reduce third-party or clinical researcher interest and support of proposed trials. Furthermore, any recall of the manufacturing lots or similar action regarding our product candidates used in clinical trials could delay the trials or detract from the integrity of the trial data and its potential use in future regulatory filings. These interruptions or failures could also impede commercialization of our product candidates and impair our competitive position. Further, we may be exposed to fluctuations in the value of the local currencies. Future appreciation of the local currencies could increase our costs. In addition, our labor costs could continue to rise as wage rates increase due to increased demand for skilled laborers and the availability of skilled labor declines in such countries.

45


We may seek to establish BD Arrangements, and, if we are not able to establish them on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, we may have to alter our development and commercialization plans.

Our product development programs and the potential commercialization of TOUR006 or any of our future product candidates will require substantial additional cash to fund expenses. For TOUR006 or any of our future product candidates, we may decide to collaborate with pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies for the development and potential commercialization of those product candidates.

We face significant competition in seeking appropriate collaborators. Whether we reach a definitive agreement for a BD Arrangement will depend, among other things, upon our assessment of the collaborator’s resources and expertise, the terms and conditions of the proposed collaboration and the proposed collaborator’s own evaluation of a potential collaboration. Such factors a potential collaborator will use to evaluate a BD Arrangement may include the design or results of clinical trials, the likelihood of approval by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, the potential market for the subject product candidate, the costs and complexities of manufacturing and delivering such product candidate to patients, the potential of competing products, the existence of uncertainty with respect to our ownership of technology, which can exist if there is a challenge to such ownership without regard to the merits of the challenge and industry and market conditions generally. The collaborator may also consider alternative product candidates or technologies for similar indications that may be available to collaborate on and whether such a BD Arrangement could be more attractive than one with us for our product candidate. The terms of any additional BD Arrangements or other arrangements that we may establish may not be favorable to us.

We may in the future be restricted under our current BD Arrangements from entering into potential future BD Arrangements on certain terms with potential collaborators. BD Arrangements are complex and time-consuming to negotiate and document. In addition, there have been a significant number of recent business combinations among large pharmaceutical companies that have resulted in a reduced number of potential future collaborators.

We may not be able to negotiate BD Arrangements on a timely basis, on acceptable terms, or at all. If we are unable to do so, we may have to curtail the development of the product candidate for which we are seeking to collaborate, reduce or delay our development program or one or more of our other development programs, delay our potential commercialization or reduce the scope of any sales or marketing activities, or increase our expenditures and undertake development or commercialization activities at our own expense. If we elect to increase our expenditures to fund development or commercialization activities on our own, we may need to obtain additional capital, which may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. If we do not have sufficient funds, we may not be able to further develop our product candidates or bring them to market and generate product revenue.

In addition, any future BD Arrangements that we enter into may not be successful. The success of our BD Arrangements will depend heavily on the efforts and activities of our collaborators. Collaborators generally have significant discretion in determining the efforts and resources that they will apply to these collaborations. Disagreements between parties to a BD Arrangement regarding clinical development and commercialization matters can lead to delays in the development process or commercializing the applicable product candidate and, in some cases, termination of the BD Arrangement. These disagreements can be difficult to resolve if neither of the parties has final decision-making authority. BD Arrangements with pharmaceutical or biotechnology companies and other third parties often are terminated or allowed to expire by the other party. Any such termination or expiration would adversely affect us financially and could harm our business reputation.

We have no experience in sales, marketing and distribution and may have to enter into agreements with third parties to perform these functions, which could prevent us from successfully commercializing TOUR006 or any potential future product candidates.

We currently have no sales, marketing or distribution capabilities. To commercialize TOUR006 or any potential future product candidates we must either develop our own sales, marketing and distribution capabilities or make arrangements with third parties to perform these services for us. If we decide to market or distribute any of our products on our own, we will have to commit significant resources to developing a marketing and sales force and supporting

46


distribution capabilities. If we decide to enter into arrangements with third parties for performance of these services, we may find that they are not available on terms acceptable to us, or at all. If we are not able to establish and maintain successful arrangements with third parties or build our own sales and marketing infrastructure, we may not be able to commercialize our product candidates, which would adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Risks Related to the Discovery, Development and Regulatory Approval of Our Product Candidates

TOUR006 and any other of our future product candidates must undergo rigorous clinical trials before seeking regulatory approvals, and clinical trials may be delayed, suspended or terminated at any time for many reasons, any of which could delay or prevent regulatory approval and, if approval is granted, commercialization of our product candidates.

TOUR006 and any other product candidates we might develop are subject to rigorous and extensive clinical trials before we can seek regulatory approval from the FDA and comparable foreign health authorities such as the European Medicines Authority. Clinical trials may be delayed, altered, suspended or terminated at any time for reasons including but not limited to:

ongoing discussions with the FDA or comparable foreign health authorities regarding the scope or design of our clinical trials;

delays in obtaining, or the inability to obtain, required approvals from institutional review boards (“IRBs”) and ethics committees or other governing entities at clinical trial sites selected for participation in our clinical trials;

delays in reaching agreement on acceptable terms with clinical trial sites on clinical budgets and/or clinical trial agreements;

lack and/or loss of personnel at clinical trial sites to conduct our trials, including patient screening, patient visits and/or assessments, data entry of patient data into the clinical database and/or processing of patient samples;

institutional policies related to in-person patient visits resulting in delays to treatments or assessments being conducted, CRO and/or sponsor visits to conduct monitoring visits to verify data and/or site adherence to regulatory requirements;

delays in patient enrollment and other key trial activities;

delays in reaching agreement on acceptable terms with prospective CROs;

the associated timelinefailure of CROs, testing laboratories and other third parties to critical milestones.satisfy their contractual duties to us or meet expected deadlines;

deviations from the trial protocol by clinical trial sites and investigators, or failures to conduct the trial in accordance with regulatory requirements;

alterations in the size and scope of the trial;

lower than anticipated retention rates of participants in clinical trials, including patients dropping out due to protocol non-compliance, side effects or disease progression;

missing or incomplete data;

failure of enrolled patients to complete treatment or to return for post-treatment follow-up;

47


for clinical trials in selected patient populations, delays in identification and auditing of central or other laboratories and the transfer and validation of assays or tests to be used to identify selected patients and test any patient samples;

implementation of new, or changes to, guidance or interpretations from the FDA or comparable foreign health authorities with respect to approval pathways for TOUR006 and any potential future product candidates we are pursuing;

the need to repeat or conduct additional clinical trials as a result of inconclusive or negative results, poorly executed testing or changes in required endpoints or other changes to the trial or analysis;

insufficient supply or deficient quality of drug substance, drug product or other clinical trial material necessary to conduct our clinical trials, as well as delays in the testing, validation, manufacturing and delivery to clinical trial sites of such material;

withdrawal of clinical trial sites or investigators from our clinical trials for any reason, including as a result of changing standards of care or the ineligibility of a site to participate in our clinical trials;

unfavorable FDA or comparable foreign health authority inspection or review of a clinical trial site or records of any clinical or preclinical investigation;

drug-related adverse effects or tolerability issues experienced by participants in our clinical trials;

changes in government regulations or administrative actions;

lack of adequate funding to continue the clinical trials;

ability to hire and retain key R&D personnel; or

the placement of a clinical hold on a trial by the FDA or comparable foreign health authorities.

We cannot guarantee that we will be able to successfully obtain FDA or other global health authority clearance to proceed with any planned clinical investigations of TOUR006 or any potential future product candidates or to accomplish required regulatory and/or manufacturing activities or all of the other activities necessary to initiate and complete clinical trials in a timely fashion, if at all. As a result, our preclinical studies and clinical trials may be extended, delayed or terminated, and we may be unable to obtain regulatory approvals or successfully commercialize our products. In addition, we have only limited experience in March 2023, pending the outcomeconducting late-stage clinical trials required to obtain regulatory approval. In any event, we do not know whether any of its review of strategic alternatives, Talaris voluntarily paused enrollmentour clinical trials will begin as planned, will need to be restructured or will be completed on schedule, or at all.

Our product development costs will increase if we experience delays in its FREEDOM-3clinical testing. Significant clinical trial delays could also shorten any periods during which we may have the exclusive right to commercialize our product candidates or allow our competitors to bring products to market before we do, which would impair our ability to successfully commercialize our product candidates and may harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. We or our partners’ inability to timely complete clinical development could result in severe scleroderma. Talarisadditional costs to us or impair our ability to generate product revenue or development, regulatory, commercialization and sales milestone payments and royalties on product sales.

48


If clinical trials of TOUR006 or any potential future product candidates fail to initiate, complete, or produce positive results or to demonstrate safety and efficacy to the satisfaction of the FDA or comparable health authorities or sufficient to demonstrate differentiation from other approved therapies or therapies in development, we may incur additional costs or experience similar outcomesdelays in completing, or ultimately be unable to complete, the development and commercialization of our product candidates.

Before obtaining marketing approval from health authorities for the sale of TOUR006 or any potential future product candidates, we or our partners must conduct extensive preclinical studies and clinical trials to demonstrate its safety and efficacy in humans. Preclinical studies and clinical trials are expensive, take several years to complete and may not yield results that support further clinical development or product approvals. The design of a clinical trial can determine whether its results will support approval of a product, and flaws in the design of a clinical trial may not become apparent until the clinical trial is well advanced. There is a high failure rate for drugs and biologic products proceeding through clinical trials and failure can occur at any stage of testing. Because we have limited experience designing clinical trials, we may be unable to design and execute a clinical trial to support regulatory approval.

We may also not be successful in generating clinical data sufficient to differentiate TOUR006 from other products in the same therapeutic area. If our competitors’ products are, or are perceived to be, more effective, more convenient, less costly or safer than TOUR006, or we are unable to demonstrate differentiation in any of those factors, we may not be able to achieve a competitive position in the market.

In addition, data obtained from preclinical and clinical activities are subject to varying interpretations, which may delay, limit or prevent regulatory approval. In any event, it is impossible to predict when or if any of our product candidates will prove safe and effective in humans or will receive regulatory approval. If we are unable to successfully discover, develop or enable our partners to develop drugs that regulatory authorities deem effective and safe in humans, we will not have a viable business.

We may not be able to file INDs, IND amendments, or clinical trial applications (“CTAs”) to commence clinical trials on the timelines we expect, and even if we are able to, the FDA or comparable health authorities may not permit us to proceed.

We may not be able to file INDs or CTAs for TOUR006 or any future product candidate it choosescandidates on the timelines we expect, if at all. For example, we may experience, or our partners may experience, manufacturing delays or other delays with IND-enabling studies. Moreover, we cannot be sure that submission of an IND or CTA will result in the FDA or comparable health authority allowing initial or later-stage clinical trials to pursue. In particular, Talarisbegin, or that, once begun, issues will not arise that suspend or terminate clinical trials. Additionally, even if such regulatory authorities agree with the design and implementation of the clinical trials set forth in an IND or CTA, we cannot guarantee that such regulatory authorities will not change their requirements in the future. These considerations also apply to new clinical trials we may submit as amendments to existing INDs or to a new IND or CTAs. Any failure to file INDs and CTAs on the timelines we expect or to obtain regulatory approvals for our trials may prevent us from completing our clinical trials or commercializing our products on a timely basis, if at all.

If we experience delays or difficulties in the enrollment of patients in clinical trials, development of TOUR006, or any potential future product candidates, may be delayed or prevented, which would have a material adverse effect on our business.

We may not be able to initiate or continue clinical trials for anyour product candidatescandidate if Talariswe, or a potential future sponsor, are unable to locate and enroll a sufficient number of eligible patients to participate in these continuing trials as required by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities. Patient enrollment is a significant factor in the timing of clinical trials. In particular, if Talaris’ clinical trials are focused on indications with relatively small patient populations, Talaris’ ability to enroll eligible patients may be limited or may result in slower enrollment than Talaris anticipates.

Patient enrollment may be affected if Talaris’our competitors have ongoing clinical trials for product candidates that are under development for the same indications as Talaris’our product candidates, at clinical trial sites participating in our clinical trials, or at clinical trial sites not participating in our clinical trials and patients who would otherwise be eligible for Talaris’our clinical trials instead enroll in clinical trials of Talaris’our competitors’ product candidates.

Furthermore, because Talaris has historically investigated the treatment of complex indications that require specialized medical care by means of an HSCT procedure, which is itself a complex procedure performed by specialized physicians and treatment centers, Talaris has faced inherent challenges in recruiting clinical trial sites to participate in Talaris’ trials and to complete Talaris’ trials on a timely basis. For example, in LDKT, each site that participated in Talaris’ trials needed to identify a lead clinician from each of the solid organ transplant and HSCT departments, who are willing and able to coordinate closely on the care and follow-up of Talaris’ patients. Talaris has historically relied on Talaris’ relationships with transplant centers of excellence to assist in identifying eligible patients and carrying out Talaris’ clinical trials, and any inability to secure or deterioration of those or similar relationships could impede Talaris’ ability to successfully enroll patients in a timely manner, if at all.

Patient enrollment may also be affected by other factors, including:

size and nature of the patient population;

49


severity of the disease under investigation;

patient eligibility criteria for the trial in question;

nature of the trial protocol;

our ability to recruit clinical trial investigators with the appropriate competencies and experience;

perceived risks and benefits of the product candidate under study;

the occurrence of adverse events attributable to our lead product candidate;

efforts to facilitate timely enrollment in clinical trials;

the number and nature of competing products or product candidates and ongoing clinical trials of competing product candidates for the same indication at clinical trial sites participating in our clinical trials, or at clinical trial sites not participating in our clinical trials;

patient referral practices of physicians;

risk that enrolled subjects will drop out or die before completion;

competition for patients from other clinical trials at clinical trial sites participating in our clinical trials, or at clinical trial sites not participating in our clinical trials;

the ability to monitor patients adequately during and after treatment;

proximity and availability of clinical trial sites for prospective patients; and

continued enrollment of prospective patients by clinical trial sites.

size and nature of the patient population;

severity of the disease under investigation;

patient eligibility criteria for the trial in question;

nature of the trial protocol;

Talaris’ ability to recruit clinical trial investigators with the appropriate competencies and experience;

perceived risks and benefits of the product candidate under study;

the occurrence of adverse events attributable to FCR001;

efforts to facilitate timely enrollment in clinical trials;

the number and nature of competing products or product candidates and ongoing clinical trials of competing product candidates for the same indication;

patient referral practices of physicians;

risk that enrolled subjects will drop out or die before completion;

competition for patients from other clinical trials;

the ability to monitor patients adequately during and after treatment;

delays in or temporary suspension of the enrollment of patients in Talaris’ ongoing and planned clinical trials;

proximity and availability of clinical trial sites for prospective patients; and

continued enrollment of prospective patients by clinical trial sites.

Even if Talaris iswe are able to enroll a sufficient number of patients in Talaris’our clinical trials, if the pace of enrollment is slower than Talaris expects,expected, the development costs for Talaris’our product candidates may increase and the completion of Talaris’our trials may be delayed or Talaris’our trials could become too expensive to complete. Any delays in completing Talaris’our clinical trials will increase

36


Talaris’ costs, delay or prevent Talaris’ product candidate development and approval process and jeopardize Talaris’our ability to commence product sales and generate revenue. Any delays in completing Talaris’our clinical studies for Talaris’our product candidates may also decrease the period of commercial exclusivity. Any of these occurrences may significantly harm Talaris’our business, financial condition, and prospects.

Should Talaris pursue and initiate the development of biopharmaceutical product candidates, it will face substantial competition, which may result in others discovering, developing or commercializing products before or more successfully than Talaris does.

Should Talaris pursue and initiate the development of product candidates, it will face competition from numerous pharmaceutical and biotechnology enterprises, as well as from academic institutions, government agencies and private and public research institutions. Talaris’ commercial opportunities will be significantly impacted if Talaris’ competitors develop and commercialize products that are safer, more effective, have fewer side effects, are less expensive or obtain more significant acceptance in the market than any product candidates that Talaris develops. Additionally, Talaris’ commercial opportunities will be significantly impacted if novel upstream products or changes in treatment protocols reduce the overall incidence or prevalence of diseases in Talaris’ current or future target population. Competition could result in reduced sales and pricing pressure on Talaris’ product candidates, if approved by applicable regulatory authorities. In addition, significant delays in the development of Talaris’ product candidates could allow Talaris’ competitors to bring products to market before Talaris and impair any ability to commercialize Talaris’ product candidates.

For example, while there are currently no FDA or European Medicines Agency (“EMA”) approved cell-based therapies for the indications Talaris had focused on targeting, other approved or commonly used drugs and therapies for Talaris’ prior target diseases, such as nintedanib to slow the rate of decline in lung function in patients with scleroderma-associated interstitial lung disease, are more well established and are accepted by physicians, patients and third-party payors. Some of these drugs are branded and subject to patent protection, and other drugs are available on a generic basis. Insurers and other third-party payors may encourage the use of generic products or specific branded products. In addition, a number of companies, academic institutions and government agencies are seeking to address limitations of existing therapies that Talaris also sought to address. For example, a number of third parties, such as Jasper Therapeutics, Inc. and bluebird bio, Inc., are seeking to develop conditioning regimens for HSCT that have lower toxicities, morbidities and mortalities than the current standard of care. Similarly, Johns Hopkins University and the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center have previously administered non-myeloablative conditioning treatments. If competitive endeavors such as these prove to be successful, the anticipated advantages of any product candidates Talaris develops in such indications in comparison to the then existing standard of care would be eliminated and the demand for Talaris’ product candidates would be materially impacted.

Talaris expects that, if any product candidates it may develop are approved, they will be priced in a manner that will reflect its long-term clinical, economic, and humanistic value. Such a pricing model may entail a single upfront cost or multiple installments contingent upon demonstration of continued benefit that will likely be more expensive than the upfront cost or initial annual costs of competitive generic products that must be taken chronically. Absent differentiated and compelling clinical evidence, pricing premiums may impede the adoption of Talaris’ products over currently approved or commonly used therapies, which may adversely impact Talaris’ business. In addition, many companies are developing new therapeutics, and Talaris cannot predict what the standard of care will become as Talaris’ product candidates continue in clinical development. Many of Talaris’ competitors or potential competitors have significantly greater market presence, financial resources and expertise in research and development, manufacturing, preclinical testing, conducting clinical trials, obtaining regulatory approvals and marketing approved products than Talaris does, and as a result may have a competitive advantage over Talaris. Smaller or early-stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, including through collaborative arrangements or mergers with large and established companies. These third parties may also compete with Talaris in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific, commercial and management personnel, establishing clinical trial sites and patient registration for clinical trials, as well as in acquiring technologies and technology licenses complementary to Talaris’ programs or advantageous to Talaris’ business.

As a result of these factors, these competitors may obtain regulatory approval of their products before Talaris is able to, which will limit Talaris’ ability to develop or commercialize any product candidates. Talaris’ competitors may also develop products that are safer, more effective, more widely used and cheaper than Talaris’, and may also be more successful than Talaris in manufacturing and marketing their products. These appreciable advantages could render Talaris’ product candidates obsolete or noncompetitive before Talaris can recover the expenses of development and commercialization.

Should Talaris resume the development of biopharmaceutical product candidates, delays in the clinical development or delays in or Talaris’ ability to achieve regulatory approval, if at all, and commercialization of Talaris’ product candidates, if approved, would have a material adverse effect on Talaris’ business.

Talaris may experience delays in Talaris’ future clinical trials and Talaris does not know whether clinical trials will begin or enroll subjects on time, will need to be redesigned or will be completed on schedule, if at all. Should Talaris resume the development of biopharmaceutical product candidates, clinical trials may be delayed, suspended or prematurely terminated for a variety of reasons, such as:

37


delay or failure in reaching agreement with the FDA or a comparable foreign regulatory authority on the design and implementation of clinical trials;

delay or failure in obtaining authorization to commence a trial, including the delay or ability to generate sufficient preclinical data to support initiation of clinical trials, or inability to comply with conditions imposed by a regulatory authority regarding the scope or design of a trial;

delay or failure in reaching agreement on acceptable terms with prospective contract research organizations (“CROs”) and clinical trial sites, the terms of which can be subject to extensive negotiation and may vary significantly among different CROs and trial sites;

the inability of CROs to perform under these agreements;

delay or failure in obtaining institutional review board (“IRB”) approval or the approval of other reviewing entities, including comparable foreign regulatory authorities, to conduct a clinical trial at each site;

withdrawal of clinical trial sites from Talaris’ clinical trials or the ineligibility of a site to participate in Talaris’ clinical trials;

delay or failure in recruiting and enrolling suitable subjects to participate in a trial;

delay or failure in subjects completing a trial or returning for post-treatment follow-up;

inability to identify and maintain a sufficient number of trial sites, including because potential trial sites may not have the capabilities required for the indication that Talaris is treating;

failure of Talaris’ third-party clinical trial managers to satisfy their contractual duties, meet expected deadlines or return trustworthy data;

delay or failure in adding new trial sites, including due to changes in policies of the clinical research sites or local IRBs;

interim results or data that are ambiguous or negative or are inconsistent with earlier results or data;

feedback from the FDA, the IRB, data safety monitoring boards (“DSMBs”) or comparable foreign authorities, or results from earlier stage or concurrent preclinical studies and clinical trials, which might require modification to the protocol for a trial;

unacceptable benefit/risk profile, unforeseen safety issues or adverse side effects;

failure to demonstrate a benefit from using a product candidate;

lack of adequate funding to continue a trial, including the incurrence of unforeseen costs due to enrollment delays, requirements to conduct additional trials or increased expenses associated with the services of Talaris’ CROs and other third parties; or

changes in governmental regulations or administrative actions, failure by Talaris or third parties to comply with regulatory requirements, or lack of adequate funding to continue a clinical trial.

Furthermore, clinical trials may be delayed, suspended or prematurely terminated for a variety of reasons, including as a result of clinical sites, investigators or other third parties deviating from the trial protocol, failing to conduct the trial in accordance with regulatory and contractual requirements, and/or dropping out of a trial.

Talaris could also encounter delays if a clinical trial is suspended or terminated by Talaris, by the IRBs of the institutions in which such trials are being conducted, by a data safety monitoring board or committee (“DSMB”) for such trial or by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities. Such authorities may impose such a suspension or termination due to a number of factors, including failure to conduct the clinical trial in accordance with regulatory requirements or Talaris’ clinical protocols, inspection of the clinical trial operations or trial site by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities resulting in the imposition of a clinical hold, unforeseen safety issues or adverse side effects, including a suspected unexpected serious adverse reaction, such as the death of a patient in Talaris’ FREEDOM-1 trial, failure to demonstrate a benefit from using a drug, changes in governmental regulations or administrative actions or lack of adequate funding to continue the clinical trial. In addition, changes in regulatory requirements and policies may occur, and Talaris may need to amend clinical trial protocols to comply with these changes. Amendments may require Talaris to resubmit Talaris’ clinical trial protocols to IRBs for reexamination, which may impact the costs, timing or successful completion of a clinical trial.

Risks Related to the Results of Preclinical Studies and/or Clinical Trials

The results of preclinical studies or earlier clinical trials are not necessarily predictive of future results. Any product candidate Talaris advances into clinical trials may not have favorable results or receive regulatory approval.operations, and prospects.

Success in preclinical studies or earlier-stage clinical trials for TOUR006, or evidence from published observations, clinical studies, or other literature for other anti-IL-6 or anti-IL-6 receptor agents, may not be indicative of such results in future or ongoing clinical trials for TOUR006.

To date, the data supporting our drug discovery and earlierdevelopment programs are derived in part from laboratory and preclinical studies and earlier-stage clinical trials conducted by Pfizer. Owing in part to the complexity of biological pathways, when used to treat human patients, as well as differences in the design or conduct of clinical trials, TOUR006 might not demonstrate the biochemical and pharmacological properties we anticipate based on laboratory studies or earlier-stage clinical trials, and it may interact with human biological systems or other drugs in unforeseen, ineffective or harmful ways. Success in preclinical studies and earlier-stage clinical trials does not ensure that later clinical trials will generate findings consistent with Talaris’ earlier clinical trials, includingthe same results or otherwise provide adequate or positive data to demonstrate the efficacyeffectiveness and safety. Likewise, a numbersafety of our current and potential future product candidates. In this regard, the data supporting our drug discovery and development programs are derived from laboratory and preclinical studies, and future clinical trials in humans may show that one or more of our product candidates are not safe and effective, in which event we may need to abandon development of such product candidates. In fact, many companies in

38


the pharmaceutical and

50


biotechnology industries including those with greater resources and experience than Talaris, have suffered significant setbacks in late-stage clinical trials even after seeingachieving promising results in earlier preclinical studies orand earlier-stage clinical trials. Despite theSimilarly, preliminary data and interim results reportedfrom clinical trials may not be predictive of final results. As a general matter, there is also a substantial risk that Phase 3 trials with larger numbers of patients and/or longer durations of therapy will fail to replicate efficacy and safety results observed in earlier clinical trials. The impact of such differences may lead to a clinical trial(s) of TOUR006 failing to reproduce any positive efficacy, safety, or other findings from laboratory and preclinical studies orand earlier-stage clinical trials for Talaris’ product candidates, to date,TOUR006.

In addition, the rationale supporting our drug discovery and development programs is also based upon published articles describing positive results may not be replicated in subsequent trials, and Talaris does not know whetherfrom clinical trial(s) and/or the clinical trials Talaris may conduct will demonstrate adequateexperience of physicians using tocilizumab (and other inhibitors of IL-6 or IL-6 receptor) in various diseases. For example, part of the rationale supporting the development and investigation for TOUR006 in TED is from published articles describing the off-label use of tocilizumab in TED, which report observations of positive efficacy and safety results.

Results from our future or ongoing clinical trials of TOUR006 may differ significantly from those from published articles in the literature of other molecules in the anti-IL-6 or anti-IL-6R class. For example, differences in clinical results may arise from differences between drug targets or between molecules that inhibit the same drug target. In addition, there may be substantial differences, even if the same disease or indication, between clinical trial(s) of TOUR006 and published literature (e.g., case series or reports, clinical trials, etc.) for other molecules in the anti-IL-6 or anti-IL-6R class based upon factors such as the clinical use setting, patient population being treated or investigated, assessments (e.g., efficacy, safety, pharmacodynamics, etc.), data collection and handling, analysis, study conduct, or other factors. Bias may have also been introduced in the published clinical reports that led to resultan incorrect determination or overestimate of the efficacy and safety results for TOUR006 because of the open-label nature and lack of controls or other robustness measures in regulatory approvalthese case series and uncontrolled clinical studies. There also can be publication bias, if only examples of successful cases of the clinical use of an anti-IL-6 or anti-IL-6R molecule (e.g., tocilizumab, satralizumab, sarilumab, siltuximab, ziltivekimab, etc.) may have been published, while treatment experiences for such molecules that were unsuccessful and/or associated with adverse safety outcomes were not published.

The impact of such differences may lead to a clinical trial(s) of TOUR006 failing to reproduce any product candidates Talaris develops. Inaccuraciespositive efficacy, safety, or other findings in Talaris’ earlier clinical data and deviations from Talaris’ clinical trial protocols can impactrelation to inhibition of IL-6 or the integrityIL-6 receptor that were reported in publications of those data, including safety data, and could impactother molecules. If such an event was to occur, there is a risk that the ability of those data to support regulatory approval. Additionally, certain of Talaris’ clinical trial endpoints also may not be adequately poweredTOUR006 development program in a particular subpopulation of Talaris’ trial population. For example, Talaris’ Phase 2 trial of FCR001 was a “single arm” trial for which there was no comparator arm to permit a comparison of Talaris’ investigational therapy against standard of care treatment. Furthermore,indication(s) or all of Talaris’indications is terminated, longer or more expensive development programs (including larger, longer, and/or costlier clinical trials conducted to date have been open-label trials. This means that both the patient and investigator know whether the patient is receiving an investigational therapy or standard of care therapy. Open-label clinical trials can be subject to various limitations that may exaggerate any therapeutic effect, as patients in open-label clinical trials are aware when they are receiving treatment. Open-label clinical trialstrials) may be subjectrequired to a “patient bias.” Moreover, patients selected for early clinical studies often include the most severe sufferers and their symptoms may have been bound to improve notwithstanding the new treatment. In addition, open-label clinical trials may be subject to an “investigator bias” where those assessing and reviewing the physiological outcomes of the clinical trials are aware of which patients have received treatment and may interpret the information of the treated group more favorably given this knowledge. While Talaris believes its trials utilized objective assessment measures for measuring primary endpoints and therefore were unlikely to be influenced in any mannerinvestigate TOUR006, TOUR006 is not approved by patient or investigator bias, such trials may utilize secondary endpoint patient reported outcome measures, and it is unknown whether the open-label design will be predictive of future clinical trial results with this or other product candidates for which Talaris may conduct an open-label clinical trial when studied in a controlled environment or with only objective endpoints. In addition, clinical data obtained from a clinical trial with an allogeneic product candidate such as FCR001 may not yield the same or better results on certain relevant outcome measures as compared to an autologous product candidate. Moreover, preclinical and clinical data are often susceptible to varying interpretations and analyses, which risk may be heightened in open-label trials where outcomes are subject to patient and investigator bias, and many companies that believed their product candidates performed satisfactorily in such trials nonetheless failed to obtain FDA, EMA or other necessary regulatory agency approval.

Even if Talaris believes that it has adequate data to support an application for regulatory approval to market any of Talaris’ product candidates, the FDA or other regulatory authorities, mayTOUR006 is not agree with Talaris’ interpretation and may require that Talaris conduct additional clinical trials to supportreimbursed by payors or other similar bodies, or there is limited or no success achieved in the regulatory approvalcommercialization of Talaris’ product candidates. If Talaris fails to obtainTOUR006.

Preliminary, initial, or interim results in Talaris’ planned and future preclinical and clinical activities and studies sufficient to meet the requirements of the relevant regulatory agencies, the development timeline and regulatory approval and commercialization prospects for any potential product candidate, and, correspondingly, Talaris’ business and financial prospects, would be materially adversely affected.

Interim, “top line” or preliminary data from Talaris’ clinical trials that Talaris maywe announce, present, or share with regulatory authoritiespublish from time to time may change as more patient data and information become available and(or are subject toupdated based upon audit, validation and verification procedures of the data/information commonly performed for clinical trials) that could result in material changes in the final data.trial results.

Talaris may announce clinical updates or share with regulatory authorities interim “top line” or preliminary data from Talaris’ clinical trials, fromFrom time to time, which is based on awe may announce, present or publish preliminary, analysis of then-available data. The outcome of preclinical development testinginitial, or interim data or other information from our clinical trials. Any such data and earlyother results from our clinical trials may materially change as more patient data and information become available. Such data and information may also undergo significant change following subsequent auditing, validation and/or verification procedures that are commonly conducted in clinical trials. Thus, any preliminary, initial, or interim data or other information may not be predictive of the success of later clinical trials, and interimfinal results of afrom the clinical trial do not necessarily predict final results. In particular, additional data from subsequent patients may not be comparable or positive with respect to efficacy, safety or target engagement. For example, in June 2022, Talaris announced interim results from Talaris’ FREEDOM-1 Phase 3 clinical trial, including limited efficacy and safety data for the first seven patients dosed. Subsequently, in October 2022, Talaris reported that one of the first seven patients, who had experienced graft versus host disease (“GvHD”) symptoms that were treatment responsive and resolved in June 2022, had been hospitalized with grade IV GvHD that was complicated by serious infections leading to respiratory and renal failure, and ultimately death.

Moreover, preclinical and clinical data are often susceptible to varying interpretations and analyses, and many companies that have believed their product candidates performed satisfactorily in preclinical studies and clinical trials have nonetheless failed to obtain marketing approval of their product candidates. These data and related findings and conclusions are subject to change following a more comprehensive review of the data related to the particular trial. Talaris also makes assumptions, estimations, calculations and conclusions as part of Talaris’ analyses of interim, “top line” or preliminary data, and Talaris may not have received or had the opportunity to fully and carefully evaluate all data.

As a result, the top-line or preliminary results that Talaris reports may differ from future results of the same trials, or different conclusions or considerations may qualify such results, once additional data have been received and fully evaluated. Interim data from clinical trials that Talaris may complete are subject to the risk that one or more of the clinical outcomes may materially change as patient enrollment continues and more patient data become available. Talaris also makes assumptions, estimations, calculations and conclusions as part of Talaris’ analyses of data, and Talaris may not have received or had the opportunity to fully and carefully evaluate all data. Preliminary or “top line” data also remain subject to audit and verification procedures that may result in the final data being materially different from the preliminary data Talaris previously announced. As a result, interim, “top-line,” and

39


preliminary data should be viewed with caution until the final data are available. Adverse differencesWe may also arrive at different conclusions, or other determinations that may qualify such results, once we have received and fully evaluated the additional data. Differences between preliminary, “top-line,”initial or interim dataresults and final dataresults could impactlead to significantly different interpretations or conclusions of the regulatory approval of, and significantly harm the prospects for any product candidate that is impacted by the applicable data.trial outcomes.

Further, others, including regulatory agencies,authorities and collaboration or regional partners, may not accept or agree with Talaris’our assumptions, estimates, calculations, conclusions or analyses or may interpret or weigh the importance of data differently, which could impact the value of the particular program,TOUR006, the approvability or commercialization of the particularTOUR006 or any future product candidate or productcandidates, and Talaris’ businessus in general. In addition, the information Talaris chooseswe choose to publicly disclose regarding a particular study or clinical trial is based on what is typically extensive information, and you or others may not agree with what Talaris determineswe determine is the material or otherwise appropriate information to include in Talaris’ disclosure, and any information Talaris determines not to disclose may ultimately be deemed significant with respect to future decisions, conclusions, views, activities or otherwise regarding a particular product candidate or Talaris’ business. our disclosure.

51


If the clinical updates,preliminary, initial or the interim “top-line,” or preliminary data that Talarisour reports differsdiffer from actual results, or if others, including regulatory authorities, disagree with the conclusions reached, Talaris’our ability to obtain approval for, and commercialize, Talaris’ product candidates, Talaris’TOUR006 may be harmed, which could significantly harm our business, operating results, prospects or financial condition, may be harmed.results of operations and prospects.

Risks Related to Potential Side Effects and the Safety and Efficacy Profile of Product Candidates

Biopharmaceutical product candidates, or associated conditioning regimens or treatment protocols,TOUR006 may cause undesirable side effects or adverse events or have other properties or safety risks, which could terminate further development of this product candidate, result in a lack of product approval by the FDA or other regulatory authorities, delay the timing (and/or increase the cost) of a product approval by the FDA or other regulatory authorities, lead to a restrictive product label that could delay or prevent their regulatory approval, limit the commercial profilesignificantly limits prescribing of an approved labelproduct, delay or result inpreclude reimbursement by payors, or significantly limit or preclude the commercialization of TOUR006.

A concerning safety signal (such as that involving serious adverse events, life-threatening adverse events, or deaths, or a nonserious adverse event that may occur at a high or concerning frequency and/or severity or if rare, leads to a significant negative consequences following any regulatory approval.

Undesirablesafety concern), tolerability concern (e.g., undesirable side effects that cannot be tolerated by patients, require suboptimal dosing alterations require additional monitoring and/or lead to patients missing or delaying doses) or other safety issue caused by TOUR006 may be observed in any future or risks exacerbated byongoing clinical trial of TOUR006. For example, dosing in the 200 mg arm of the prior Phase 2 trial of TOUR006 in systemic lupus erythematosus was stopped for safety concerns based on an unblinded data review and recommendation from the internal review committee for that study. Prior safety (clinical and nonclinical) data for TOUR006, safety data and observations for other molecules in the anti-IL-6 and anti-IL-6R classes, and published safety data and observations for other molecules in the anti-IL-6 and anti-IL-6R classes used in the same disease or indication as that being investigated in TOUR006 clinical trial(s) may not be indicative of similar safety and tolerability results or profile for TOUR006 in future or ongoing clinical trials. For example, some potential therapeutics developed in the biopharmaceutical industry that initially showed therapeutic promise in early-stage trials have later been found to have a problematic safety or tolerability profile that prevented their further development.

In addition, TOUR006 is a recombinant protein. Recombinant proteins can sometimes induce host immune responses that can cause the production of anti-drug antibodies (“ADAs”). ADAs may neutralize the effectiveness of the product candidatescandidate, can require that higher doses be used to obtain a therapeutic effect or associated conditioning regimenscan cross react with substances naturally occurring in a subject’s body, which can cause unintended effects, including potential impacts on efficacy and adverse events. For example, the ADAs may prevent the drug from offering a therapeutic benefit or treatment protocols couldlead to a less efficacious effect. ADAs may also cause Talarishypersensitivity reactions (including anaphylaxis) that may require patients to stop taking that drug or regulatory authoritiescan, in some cases, be serious, life-threatening, or fatal. If we determine that ADAs are causing safety or efficacy concerns for TOUR006, we may need to interrupt, delay, halt, or haltterminate our clinical trials and could result in a more restrictive label or the delay or denial ofaffected product candidates. TOUR006 may never obtain regulatory approval by the FDA or other comparable foreign regulatory authority. Asauthorities. We cannot provide assurance that the detection of ADAs will not occur at a result ofhigher rate than what we have observed historically or that ADA will not lead to meaningful impacts upon efficacy or safety, or toxicity issues that Talaris may experiencethe detection of ADAs will not otherwise result in Talaris’ clinical trials, Talaris mayTOUR006 not receive approval to market any product candidates, which could prevent Talaris from ever generating revenues or achieving profitability. Results of Talaris’ trials could reveal an unacceptably high severity and incidence of side effects, or side effects outweighing the benefits of Talaris’ product candidates. In such an event, Talaris’ trials could be delayed, suspended or terminated andbeing approved by the FDA or comparable foreignother regulatory authoritiesauthorities.

If a safety signal, tolerability concern, ADA concern, or other safety issue emerges from any future or ongoing clinical trial for TOUR006, or any other IL-6 inhibitor product candidate, this could order Talaris to cease further developmentresult in:

slowing of or deny approval of Talaris’ product candidates for any or all targeted indications. Additionally, during the course of Talaris’ product development programs, FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authority review teams may change and new agency personnel may view the risk-benefit profile of any product candidates Talaris may develop differently than prior agency review teams. Any negative views as to the risk-benefit profile of any product candidates Talaris may developpatient enrollment in the future could lead FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities to require that Talaris conduct additionalour clinical trials or inability to enroll the trials;

a meaningful rate of patients dropping out of trials (which could require more onerouslead to a delay in completing the clinical trial designs for any ongoing or futureadversely impact the trial’s probability of success in observing a positive efficacy result);

a meaningful rate of patients missing or postponing their trial procedures (including but not limited to dosing, study visits and efficacy assessments) which in turn could lead to a delay in completing the clinical trials. The drug-related side effects could affect patient recruitment or the ability of enrolled subjects to complete the trial or resultadversely impact the trial’s probability of success in potential product liability claims. In addition, while Talaris notesobserving a positive efficacy result;

an inability to use a dose that offers efficacy or necessitating the summaryuse of safety findings Talaris has gathereda lower dose that may offer only low or partial efficacy;

52


suspension of the clinical trial by us, the FDA or other regulatory authority, or local IRB or ethics committee;

termination of the clinical trial;

need for additional and/or larger clinical trial(s) to date, certain populations of patients receiving Talaris’ product candidates may experience side effects in greater frequency or severity than others who may receive Talaris’ product candidates and additional clinical research is planned to more fully understandfurther evaluate the safety profile of Talaris’ product candidates in Talaris’ patient populations and indicationsTOUR006;

abandonment of focus. Furthermore, Talaris or others may later identify undesirable side effects caused by Talaris’ products, including during any long-term follow-up observation period, such as that involved in Talaris’ previous trials of FCR001.

40


For example, LDKT and HSCT involve certain known potential post-procedure complications that may manifest several weeks or months after a transplant and which may be more common in certain patient populations. For example, up to 20% of patients with inherited metabolic diseases treated with HSCT experience primary engraftment failure, resulting in severe complications, including death. GvHD also accounts for approximately 10% of deaths following allogeneic HSCT. In June 2022, Talaris reported three cases of low-grade acute GvHD (“aGvHD”) in Talaris’ FREEDOM-1 clinical trial. One of the three aGvHD patients was subsequently diagnosed with moderate chronic GvHD and was also responding to treatment at the time of the June 2022 update. In October 2022, Talaris reported that the patient who had been diagnosed with chronic GvHD had died. The patient had been hospitalized with grade IV GvHD that was complicated by serious infections leading to respiratory and renal failure, and ultimately death. This event triggered a pre-specified, temporary stopping requirement and review by the FREEDOM-1 Data Monitoring Committee (“DMC”). After their review of this case, the DMC determined that trial enrollment and dosing could continue. Talaris also reported the event and the DMC’s recommendation to the FDA.

Should Talaris resume the development of biopharmaceutical product candidates, if theseTOUR006 for that particular indication being evaluated by the clinical trial or for other indications or as a program altogether;

refusal by the FDA or other serious adverse events, undesirable side effects, regulatory authority to grant product approval;

restrictions on the product labeling (such as a black boxed warning, warnings and precautions, limitations of use, and/or unexpected characteristics are identified duringnarrowed and limited indication) that may significantly limit the developmentprescribing and usage of any of Talaris’ product candidates, it may be difficultTOUR006;

requirement to determine whether these complications were or were not related to Talaris’ investigational therapy, and Talaris may need to limit, delay or abandon Talaris’ further clinical development of those product candidates, even if such events, effects or characteristics were potentially the result of related procedures generally, and not directly or specifically caused or exacerbated by Talaris’ product candidates. All serious adverse events or unexpected side effects will be continually monitored per the clinical trial’s approved protocol. If serious adverse events are determined to be directly or specifically caused or exacerbated by Talaris’ product candidates, Talaris would follow the trial protocol’s requirements, which include certain pre-specified stopping requirements, and which call for Talaris’ DSMB to review all available clinical data in making a recommendation regarding the trial’s continuation. However, there may be a failure by trial sites to effectively execute Talaris’ clinical trial protocols, including during any long-term follow-up period for Talaris’ clinical trials during the conduct of future clinical trials or following any product approval Talaris may receive. For example, HSCT is associated with an increased risk of cancer. Among the likely causes of this increased risk is the total body irradiation and high-dose chemotherapy used in myeloablative conditioning regimens. Patients who received Facilitated Allo-HSCT Therapy in clinical trials after non-myeloablative conditioning have developed cancer after transplant. For example, a patient, a lifelong smoker, in Talaris’ Phase 2 clinical trial developed non-small cell carcinoma of the lung approximately four years after HSCT.

Additionally, if any of Talaris’ product candidates receives regulatory approval, and Talaris or others later identify undesirable side effects caused or risks exacerbated by such product, a number of potentially significant negative consequences could result. For example, the FDA could require Talaris to adoptdevelop a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (“REMS”) for TOUR006 in the U.S. or a similar strategy as required by a comparable foreign regulatory authority;

a view by healthcare professionals that TOUR006 presents an unfavorable benefit-risk profile which in turn may significantly limit the prescribing and usage of TOUR006;

a meaningful rate of patients either choosing to ensurenot start TOUR006 treatment or to prematurely discontinue usage of TOUR006;

use of additional monitoring by healthcare professionals, either on their own or due to the recommendations of expert panels or treatment guidelines, in the use of TOUR006 that in turn may significantly limit the benefitsprescribing and usage of treatment with such product candidate outweighTOUR006;

a view by payors that TOUR006 presents an unfavorable benefit-risk profile which in turn may significantly limit the risksreimbursement of TOUR006;

a requirement to conduct additional post-market studies, including clinical trials;

lawsuit(s) that results in us being held liable for each potential patient, which may include, amongharm caused to trial participants or other things, a communication planpatients; and/or

reputational injury to health care practitioners, patient education, extensive patient monitoring or distribution systems and processes that are highly controlled, restrictive and more costly than what is typical for the industry. Talaris or its collaborators may also be required to adopt a REMS or engage in similar actions, such as patient education, certification of health care professionals or specific monitoring, if Talaris or others later identify undesirable side effects caused by any product that Talaris develops alone or with collaborators. Other potentially significant negative consequences include that:us.

Talaris may be forced to suspend marketing of that product, or decide to remove the product form the marketplace;

regulatory authorities may withdraw or change their approvals of that product;

regulatory authorities may require additional warnings on the label or limit access of that product to selective specialized centers with additional safety reporting and with requirements that patients be geographically close to these centers for all or part of their treatment;

Talaris may be required to create a medication guide outlining the risks of the product for patients, or to conduct post-marketing studies;

Talaris may be required to change the way the product is administered;

Talaris could be subject to fines, injunctions, or the imposition of criminal or civil penalties, or to sued and held liable for harm caused to subjects or patients; and

the product may become less competitive, and Talaris’ reputation may suffer.

Any of these eventsoccurrences could diminish the usage or otherwise limit the commercial success of Talaris’ product candidatesmaterially and prevent Talaris from achieving or maintaining market acceptance of the affected product candidate, if development is resumed and they are approved by applicable regulatory authorities.

If Talaris pursues the development of product candidates and its clinical trials fail to demonstrate safety and efficacy to the satisfaction of the FDA or similar regulatory authorities outside the United States or otherwise produce negative results, Talaris

41


may incur additional costs or experience delays in completing, or ultimately be unable to complete, the development and commercialization of such product candidates.

Before obtaining regulatory approval for the sale of Talaris’ product candidates, Talaris must conduct extensive clinical trials to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of such product candidates in humans. Clinical testing is expensive, difficult to design and implement, can take many years to complete and the outcome is uncertain. Despite preclinical and early clinical trial data, any product candidate can unexpectedly fail at any stage of further development. The historical failure rate for product candidates is high. The outcome of preclinical studies and early clinical trials may not be predictive of the success of later clinical trials, and interimadversely affect our business, financial condition, results of a clinical trial do not necessarily predict final results. Even if Talaris’ clinical trials are completed as planned, Talaris cannot be certain that their results will support Talaris’ proposed indications. In addition, if Talaris’ clinical results are not successful, Talaris may terminate clinical trials foroperations and prospects.

TOUR006 is a product candidate within the IL-6 inhibitor and abandon any further research or studies of the product candidate. Any delay in, or termination of, Talaris’ clinical trials will delay and possibly preclude the filing of any BLAs with the FDA and, ultimately, Talaris’ ability to commercialize Talaris’ product candidates and generate product revenues.IL-6R

Risks Related to Combination Therapies

Should Talaris resume the development of biopharmaceutical product candidates, Talaris may develop product candidates in multiple indications and in combination with other therapies, which exposes Talaris to additional risks. Combination therapies and multiple indications involve additional complexity and risk that could delay or cause Talaris’ programs to stall or fail; development of such programs may be more costly, may take longer to achieve regulatory approval inhibitor class and may be associated with unanticipated adverse events.

Clinical development and commercialization of combination therapies involve additional complexity and risk, including without limitation, those involving drug-drug interactions, dose selection, unanticipated adverse events, clinical design and approvals of regulatory bodies and therapeutic development networks of patient advocacy groups. Even if any product candidate Talaris develops were to receive marketing approval or be commercializedadversely impacted by results for Talaris in combination with other existing therapies, Talaris would continue to bear the risks that the FDA or similar foreign regulatory authorities could revoke approval of the therapy used in combination with Talaris’ product candidate or that safety, efficacy, manufacturing or supply issues could arise with these existing therapies. If Talaris is unable to manage the additional complexities and risks of the development and commercialization of combination therapies, the development of any product candidate could be delayed, halted or otherwise fail to receive or maintain approval and may be less successful commercially.

Should Talaris resume the development of biopharmaceutical product candidates, Talaris may develop product candidates for a number of different indications. Depending on the indication, patients may manifest a variety of differing co-morbidities, and may be more or less susceptible to certain severe adverse events or complicationsmembers in the nearclass, which could delay, terminate or longer term. If any of these conditions or complications were to affect a patient who is participating in one of Talaris’ clinical trials, it may be difficult or impossible to determine whether these adverse events or complications are related toincrease the original or underlying condition or to Talaris’ product candidate. If Talaris’ trials enroll a relatively small number of patients, even a small number of severe adverse events or serious complications could result in the delay or haltcost of development of Talaris’ product candidates in oneTOUR006, delay or more of Talaris’ targeted indications.

Risks Related to Regulatory Matters and Approvals

Talaris’ product candidates may represent a novel therapeutic approach that could result in heightened regulatory scrutiny. The regulatory landscape that applies to novel therapies is rigorous, complex, uncertain and subject to change.

The clinical trial requirements of the FDA, the EMA, and other regulatory authorities and the criteria these regulators use to determine the safety and efficacy of a product candidate vary substantially according to the type, complexity, novelty, and intended use and market of the potential products. The regulatoryprevent approval process for novel product candidates can be more expensive and take longer than for other, better known, or more extensively studied pharmaceutical or other product candidates. If Talaris develops novel potential treatments for conditions in which there is little clinical experience with new endpoints and methodologies, there is heightened risk that the FDA, the EMA or other regulatory bodies may not consider the clinical trial endpoints to provide clinically meaningful results, and the resulting clinical data and results may be more difficult to analyze. Regulatory agencies administering existing or future regulations or legislation may not allow production and marketing of products utilizing cell therapies in a timely manner or under technically or commercially feasible conditions. In addition, regulatory action or private litigation could result in expenses, delays, or other impediments to Talaris’ research programs or the commercialization of resulting products.

For example, Talaris’ single-dose cell therapy represented a novel combination of nonmyeloablative conditioning, FCR001, and stem cell transplant-oriented treatment protocols, developing and commercializing FCR001 subjected Talaris to a number of challenges, including obtaining regulatory approval from the FDA and other regulatory authorities, which have limited experience with regulating the development and commercialization of stem cell therapies. Regulatory requirements governing the development of cell therapy products have changed frequently and may continue to change in the future. In 2016, the FDA established the Office of

42


Tissues and Advanced Therapies (“OTAT”) within the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (“CBER”), to consolidate the review of cell therapy, and related products, and to advise the CBER on its review. In September 2022, the FDA announced retitling of OTAT to the Office of Therapeutic Products (“OTP”) and elevation of OTP to a “Super Office” to meet its growing cell and gene therapy workload. Moreover, serious adverse events or developments in clinical trials of cell therapy product candidates conducted by others may cause the FDA or other regulatory bodiesauthorities, lead to initiate a restrictive product label that significantly limits prescribing, delay or preclude reimbursement by payors, or significantly limit or preclude the commercialization of TOUR006.

TOUR006 is a member of the IL-6 inhibitor and IL-6R inhibitor class. There are other products and product candidates within this class that are being developed or commercialized by third parties over which we have no control and for which we do not have any information beyond what is publicly available. It is possible that negative data or information may emerge from one or more of these other products or product candidates related to a limitation or failure of efficacy, safety concern, negative publicity or other issue. Such an occurrence may adversely impact TOUR006 or its perceived product profile and could terminate further development of TOUR006, result in a lack of product approval by the FDA or other regulatory authorities, delay the timing (and/or increase the cost) of a product approval, lead to a restrictive product label that significantly limits prescribing, delay or preclude reimbursement by payors, or significantly limit or preclude the commercialization of TOUR006.

53


We face significant competition from other biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies targeting autoimmune and cardiovascular disease indications. Our operating results will suffer if we fail to compete effectively.

The markets for autoimmune disease therapies are competitive and are characterized by significant technological development and new product introduction. For example, there are several large and small pharmaceutical companies focused on delivering therapeutics for TED or ASCVD. We anticipate that, if we obtain regulatory approval of TOUR006, we will face significant competition from other approved therapies or drugs that become available in the future for the treatment of our target indications. If approved, TOUR006 may also compete with unregulated, unapproved and off-label treatments. TOUR006 may also face biosimilar competition following loss of regulatory exclusivity and/or patent expiry. Even if an approved biosimilar product is less effective than TOUR006, a less effective biosimilar may be more quickly adopted by physicians and patients than our competing product candidate based upon cost. TOUR006 will have to compete with existing therapies, some of which are widely known and accepted by physicians and patients. To compete successfully in this market, we will have to demonstrate that the relative cost, safety and efficacy of our product, if approved, provides an attractive alternative to existing and other new therapies to gain a share of some patients’ discretionary budgets and to gain physicians’ attention within their clinical holdpractices. Some of the companies that may offer competing products also have a broad range of other product offerings, large direct sales forces and long-term customer relationships with our target physicians, which could inhibit our market penetration efforts. Such competition could lead to reduced market share for our product candidate and contribute to downward pressure on Talaris’the pricing of our product candidate, which could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We expect to face competition from agents with different mechanisms of action in both TED and ASCVD. For example, in January 2020, the FDA approved Amgen Inc.’s (formerly Horizon Therapeutics Public Limited Company) Tepezza (teprotumumab), an anti-IGF-1R antibody, for the treatment of TED. In addition, there are multiple other agents in various stages of development for the treatment of TED, including Roche’s satralizumab, an anti-IL-6R monoclonal antibody. The first line of treatment for patients with TED is generally immunosuppressive therapy, including high doses of corticosteroids. For ASCVD, several classes of therapies are routinely used, including statins, beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors, ARBs, aspirin, and other anti-platelet agents. Additionally, we are aware of two IL-6 blockers currently being developed for the treatment of ASCVD.

Many of our existing or potential competitors have substantially greater financial, technical and human resources than we do and significantly greater experience in the discovery and development of product candidates, as well as in obtaining regulatory approvals of those product candidates in the U.S. and in foreign countries. Many of our current and potential future competitors also have significantly more experience commercializing drugs that have been approved for marketing. Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries could result in even more resources being concentrated among a smaller number of our competitors. Competition may reduce the number and types of patients available to us to participate in clinical trials because some patients who might have opted to enroll in our trials may instead opt to enroll in a trial being conducted by one of our competitors.

Due to varying regulatory requirements in certain foreign countries, there are many more products and procedures available for use to treat autoimmune diseases in some international markets than are approved for use in the U.S. In certain international markets, there are also fewer limitations on the claims that our competitors can make about the effectiveness of their products and the manner in which they can market their products.

Our ability to compete successfully will depend largely on our ability to:

develop and commercialize therapies in our target indications that are competitive with other products in the market;

demonstrate through our clinical trials that TOUR006 or otherwise change the requirementsany potential future product candidates is differentiated from existing and future therapies;

attract and retain qualified scientific, product development, manufacturing and commercial personnel;

obtain patent or other proprietary protection for approvalTOUR006 and any potential future product candidates;

54


obtain required regulatory approvals, including approvals to market TOUR006 or any potential future product candidates we develop;

have commercial quantities of any of Talaris’approved product candidates. Although themanufactured at acceptable cost and quality levels and in compliance with FDA decides whether individual cell therapy protocols may proceed, the review process and determinations of other reviewing bodies can impede or delay the initiation of a clinical trial, even if the FDA has reviewed the trial and approved its initiation. Adverse developments in preclinical studies or clinical trials conducted by others in the field of cell therapy may cause the FDA, the EMA, and other regulatory bodies to amend the requirements for approval ofrequirements;

successfully commercialize TOUR006 or any potential future product candidates, Talarisif approved;

obtain coverage and adequate reimbursement from, and negotiate competitive pricing with, third-party payors; and

avoid regulatory exclusivities or patents held by competitors that may develop orinhibit our products’ entry to the market.

The availability of our competitors’ products could limit the use of products utilizing cell therapies, either of which could harm Talaris’ business.

Talaris may not bedemand and the price we are able to obtain orphan drug designation for any product candidates, or to obtain and maintain the benefits associated with orphan drug designation.

Regulatory authorities in some jurisdictions, including the United States and Europe, may designate drugs or therapies for relatively small patient populations as orphan drugs. Under the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may designate a product as an orphan drug if it is intended to treat a rare disease or condition, which is generally defined as a patient population of fewer than 200,000 individuals annually in the United States. In the European Union (the “EU”), the prevalence of the condition must not be more than five in 10,000. Orphan drug designation neither shortens the development time or regulatory review time of a drug nor gives the drug any advantage in the regulatory review or approval process.

If a product that has orphan drug designation from the FDA subsequently receives the first FDA approval for a particular active ingredient for the disease for which it has such designation, the product is entitled to orphan product exclusivity, which means that the FDA may not approve any other applications, including a BLA, to market the same biologic for the same indication, for seven years, except in limited circumstances such as a showing of clinical superiority to the product with orphan product exclusivity or if FDA finds that the holder of the orphan exclusivity has not shown that it can ensure the availability of sufficient quantities of the orphan product to meet the needs of patients with the disease or condition for which the product was designated. Even if Talaris or Talaris’ collaborators obtain orphan designation to a product candidate, Talaris may not be the first to obtain marketing approval for any particular orphan indication due to the uncertainties associated with developing pharmaceutical products. The scope of exclusivity is limited to the scope of any approved indication, even if the scope of the orphan designation is broader than the approved indication. Additionally, exclusive marketing rights may be limited if Talaris or Talaris’ collaborators seek approval for an indication broader than the orphan designated indication and may be lost if the FDA later determines that the request for designation was materially defective or if the manufacturer is unable to assure sufficient quantities of the product to meet the needs of patients with the rare disease or condition. Further, even if a product obtains orphan drug exclusivity, that exclusivity may not effectively protect the product from competition because different drugs with different active moieties can be approved for the same condition. Even after an orphan drug is approved, the FDA can subsequently approve a product with the same active moiety for the same condition if the FDA concludes that the later product is safer, more effective, or makes a major contribution to patient care. Furthermore, the FDA can waive orphan exclusivity if Talaris or Talaris’ collaborators are unable to manufacture sufficient supply of the product. The FDA may further reevaluate the Orphan Drug Act and its regulations and policies. Talaris does not know if, when, or how the FDA may change the orphan drug regulations and policies in the future, and it is uncertain how any changes might affect Talaris’ business. Depending on what changes the FDA may make to its orphan drug regulations and policies, Talaris’ business could be adversely impacted.

Similarly, in Europe, a medicinal product may receive orphan designation under Article 3 of Regulation (EC) 141/2000. This applies to products that are intended for a life-threatening or chronically debilitating condition and either (1) such condition affects no more than five in 10,000 persons in the E.U. when the application is made, or (2) the product, without the benefits derived from orphan status, would be unlikely to generate sufficient returns in the E.U. to justify the necessary investment. Moreover, in order to obtain orphan designation in the E.U. it is necessary to demonstrate that there exists no satisfactory method of diagnosis, prevention or treatment of such condition authorized for marketing in the E.U. or, if such a method exists, the product will be of significant benefit to those affected by the condition. In the E.U., orphan medicinal products are eligible for financial incentives such as reduction of fees or fee waivers and applicants can benefit from specific regulatory assistance and scientific advice. Products receiving orphan designation in the E.U. can receive ten years of market exclusivity, during which time no similar medicinal product for the same indication may be placed on the market. An orphan product can also obtain an additional two years of market exclusivity in the E.U. for pediatric studies. However, the ten-year market exclusivity may be reduced to six years if, at the end of the fifth year, it is established that the product no longer meets the criteria for orphan designation-for example, if the product is sufficiently profitable not to justify maintenance of market exclusivity. Additionally, marketing authorization may be granted to a similar product for the same indication at any time if:

the second applicant can establish that its product, although similar, is safer, more effective or otherwise clinically superior;

the first applicant consents to a second orphan medicinal product application; or

the first applicant cannot supply enough orphan medicinal product.

43


If Talaris does not receive or maintain orphan drug designation to product candidates for which Talaris seeks such designation, it could limit Talaris’ ability to realize revenues from such product candidates.

The incidence and prevalence of the target patient populationcharge for any product candidate Talaris develops will be basedwe develop. The inability to compete with existing or subsequently introduced treatments would have an adverse impact on estimatesour business, financial condition, results of operations and third-party sources. prospects.

If the market opportunityopportunities for Talaris’TOUR006 and any potential future product candidates isare smaller than Talaris estimateswe estimate or if any approval that Talaris obtainswe obtain is based on a narrower definition of the patient population, Talaris’then our revenue potential and ability to achieve profitability mightwill be materially and adversely affected.

Talaris has made and may in the future make estimates regarding the incidence and prevalence of target patient populations based on various third-party sources and internally generated analysis. These estimates may be inaccurate or based on imprecise data. For example, theThe total addressable market opportunity for aTOUR006 and any other potential future product candidate in any given indicationcandidates we may develop will ultimately depend on,upon, among other things, acceptancethe proportion of such product candidatepatients identified as sensitive to our treatments, acceptance by the medical community, and patient access, drug and any related companion diagnostic pricing and their reimbursement.

We intend to initially seek regulatory approval of TOUR006 as therapies for patients with TED and ASCVD. The number of patients in the addressableour targeted commercial markets and elsewhere may turn out to be lower than expected, patients may not be otherwise amenable to treatment with such product candidate,our drugs or new patients may become increasingly difficult to identify or gain access to, all of which would adversely affect our results of operations and our business. In addition, we may significantly harm Talaris’not be successful in our efforts to identify additional product candidates. Due to our limited resources and access to capital, we must prioritize development of certain product candidates, which may prove to be the wrong choice and may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We may not successfully identify new product candidates to expand our development pipeline.

TalarisThe success of our business over the longer term depends upon our ability to identify and validate new potential therapeutics. Efforts to identify new product candidates require substantial technical, financial and human resources, and our methodology may nevernot successfully identify medically relevant potential therapeutics to be developed as product candidates. Moreover, our research and business development efforts may identify molecules that initially show promise yet fail to yield product candidates for clinical development for multiple reasons. For example, potential product candidates may, on further study, be shown to have inadequate efficacy, harmful side effects, suboptimal drug profiles, suboptimal manufacturability or stability, or other characteristics suggesting that they are unlikely to be commercially viable products. Our inability to successfully identify additional new product candidates to advance into clinical trials could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

55


Risks Related to the Marketing and Commercialization of Our Product Candidates

Even if any of our current or future product candidates receive marketing approval, they may fail to achieve the degree of market acceptance by physicians, patients, third-party payors and others in the medical community necessary for commercial success.

If TOUR006 or any of our potential future product candidates receive marketing approval, they may nonetheless fail to gain sufficient market acceptance by physicians, patients, third-party payors and others in the medical community. If our product candidates do not achieve an adequate level of acceptance, we may not generate significant product revenues and we may not become profitable. The degree of market acceptance of our current or potential future candidates, if approved for commercial sale, will depend on a number of factors, including:

the efficacy, safety and potential advantages compared to alternative treatments, including pharmaceutical and nonpharmaceutical interventions;

the acceptance of our product candidates as front-line treatments for various indications;

the prevalence and severity of any side effects, in particular compared to alternative treatments;

limitations or warnings contained in the labeling approved by the FDA or other regulatory authorities;

the size of the target patient population;

the willingness and ability of the target patient population to try new therapies and adhere or comply with taking such therapy as prescribed and of physicians to prescribe these therapies;

our ability to offer our products for sale at competitive prices;

our ability to protect our approved products from generic or biosimilar competition through the use of regulatory exclusivity or patents;

the convenience and ease of administration compared to alternative treatments;

the amount of clinical burden upon healthcare professionals or patients related to any additional monitoring or other measures needed in order for patients to initiate and/or continue receiving such products;

the strength of marketing, sales and distribution support;

publicity for our product candidates and competing products and treatments;

the availability of third-party payor coverage and adequate reimbursement;

the timing of any marketing approval in relation to other product approvals;

support from patient advocacy groups; and

any restrictions on the use of our products together with other medications.

Even if we obtain approval to market TOUR006 or other potential future product candidates, these products may become subject to unfavorable pricing regulations, reimbursement practices from third-party payors or healthcare reform initiatives in the U.S. and abroad, which could harm our business.

56


The regulations that govern marketing approvals, pricing and reimbursement for new drug products vary widely from country to country. Current and future legislation may significantly change the approval requirements in ways that could involve additional costs and cause delays in obtaining approvals. In many regions, including the European Union (“EU”), Japan and Canada, the pricing of prescription drugs is controlled by the government and some countries require approval of the sale price of a drug before it can be marketed. In many countries, the pricing review period begins after regulatory approval for the product is granted. Regulatory agencies in those countries could determine that the pricing for our products should be based on prices of other commercially available drugs for the same disease, rather than allowing us to market our products at a premium as new drugs. As a result, we might obtain marketing approval for a product in a particular country, but then be subject to price regulations that delay or limit its commercial launch of the product, possibly for lengthy time periods, which could negatively impact the revenue we generate from the sale of the product in that particular country. In some foreign markets, prescription pharmaceutical pricing remains subject to continuing governmental control even after initial approval is granted. Adverse pricing limitations may hinder our ability to recoup our investment in one or more product candidates, even if our product candidates obtain marketing approval.

Our commercial success also depends on coverage and adequate reimbursement of our product candidates by third-party payors, including government payors, private health insurers, health maintenance organizations and other organizations, which may be difficult or time-consuming to obtain, may be limited in scope and may not be obtained in all jurisdictions in which we may seek to market our products. In the U.S. and markets in other countries, governments and private insurers closely examine medical products to determine whether they should be covered by reimbursement and, if so, the level of reimbursement that will apply. In the U.S., the principal decisions about reimbursement for new medicines are typically made by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”), an agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”). CMS decides whether and to what extent a new medicine will be covered and reimbursed under Medicare and private payors tend to follow CMS to a substantial degree. Government authorities and other third-party payors have attempted to control costs by limiting coverage and the amount of reimbursement for particular drugs. Increasingly, third-party payors are requiring that drug companies provide them with predetermined discounts from list prices and are challenging the prices charged for drug products. We cannot be sure that coverage and reimbursement will be available for any product that we or our partners commercialize and, if reimbursement is available, what the level of reimbursement will be. Coverage and reimbursement may impact the demand for, or the price of, any product candidate for which we or our partners obtain regulatory approval. If coverage and reimbursement are not available or reimbursement is available only to limited levels, we and our partners may not be able to successfully commercialize any product candidate for which marketing approval is obtained.

There may be significant delays in obtaining coverage and reimbursement for newly approved drugs, and coverage may be more limited than the purposes for which the drug is approved by the FDA or comparable foreign health authorities. Moreover, eligibility for coverage and reimbursement does not imply that a drug will be paid for in all cases or at a rate that covers our costs, including costs of research, development, manufacture, sale and distribution. Interim reimbursement levels for new drugs, if applicable, may also not be sufficient to cover our costs and may only be temporary. Reimbursement rates may vary according to the use of the drug and the clinical setting in which it is used, may be based on reimbursement levels already set for lower cost drugs and may be incorporated into existing payments for other services. Net prices for drugs may be reduced by mandatory discounts or rebates required by government healthcare programs or private payors and by any future relaxation of laws that presently restrict imports of drugs from countries where they may be sold at lower prices than in the U.S. In addition, many pharmaceutical manufacturers must calculate and report certain price reporting metrics to the government, such as average sales price and best price. Penalties may apply in some cases when such metrics are not submitted accurately and timely. Further, these prices for drugs may be reduced by mandatory discounts or rebates required by government healthcare programs. Our inability to promptly obtain coverage and profitable reimbursement rates from both government-funded and private payors for any approved products that we develop could have a material adverse effect on our operating results, ability to raise capital needed to commercialize products and overall financial condition.

Even if we are able to obtain regulatory approval for TOUR006 or any of our future product candidates, we may receive an undesirable label, including, but not limited to, a black boxed warning, which could impede our ability to successfully commercialize TOUR006 or any of our future product candidates or compete successfully.

Even if we receive regulatory approval for any of our product candidates, the FDA may determine that labels for our product candidates may require safety restrictions such as a black boxed warning, warnings and precautions, limitations of use, and/or narrowed and limited indication that may significantly limit the prescribing and usage of TOUR006. Safety restrictions such as a black boxed warning may impede our ability to successfully market and commercialize our product candidates and our ability to compete successfully against our competitors.

57


Two approved therapies in the IL-6 class, tocilizumab (Actemra®) and sarilumab (Kevzara®) have received black boxed warning for risks of serious infections. Two approved therapies in the IL-6 class, satralizumab (Enspryng®) and siltuximab (Sylvant®) have not. We cannot guarantee or ensure that TOUR006 will not get a black boxed warning or significant safety restrictions on its product labels, if approved.

Our estimates of market opportunity and forecasts of market growth may prove to be inaccurate, and even if the markets in which we compete achieve the forecasted growth, our business may not grow at similar rates, or at all.

Our market opportunity estimates and growth forecasts are subject to significant uncertainty and are based on assumptions and estimates which may not prove to be accurate. Our estimates and forecasts relating to size and expected growth of our target market may prove to be inaccurate. Even if the markets in which we compete meet our size estimates and growth forecasts, our business may not grow at similar rates, or at all. Our growth is subject to many factors, including our success in implementing our business strategy, which is subject to many risks and uncertainties.

Our revenue will be dependent, in part, upon the size of the markets in the territories for which we gain regulatory approval, the accepted price for the product, the ability to obtain coverage and reimbursement, the ability to gain market share and whether we own the commercial rights for that territory. If the number of our addressable patients is not as significant as our estimates, the indication approved by regulatory authorities is narrower than we expect or the treatment population is narrowed by competition, physician choice or treatment guidelines, we may not generate significant revenue from sales of such products, even if approved.

Product liability lawsuits against us could cause us to incur substantial liabilities and to limit commercialization of any products that we may develop.

We face an inherent risk of product liability exposure related to the testing of our product candidates in human clinical trials and will face an even greater risk if we or our partner commercializes any resulting products. Product liability claims may be brought against us by subjects enrolled in our clinical trials, patients, healthcare providers or others using, administering or selling our products. If we cannot successfully defend ourselves against claims that our product candidates or products that we may develop caused injuries, we could incur substantial liabilities. Regardless of merit or eventual outcome, liability claims may result in:

decreased demand for any product candidates or products that we may develop;

termination of clinical trial sites or entire trial programs;

injury to our reputation and significant negative media attention;

withdrawal of clinical trial participants;

significant costs to defend the related litigation;

substantial monetary awards to trial subjects or patients;

loss of revenue;

diversion of management and scientific resources from our business operations; and

the inability to commercialize any products that we may develop.

58


Our clinical trial liability insurance coverage may not adequately cover all liabilities that we may incur. We may not be able to maintain insurance coverage at a reasonable cost or in an amount adequate to satisfy any liability that may arise. Our inability to obtain product liability insurance at an acceptable cost or to otherwise protect against potential product liability claims could prevent or delay the commercialization of any products or product candidates that we develop. We intend to expand our insurance coverage for products to include the sale of commercial products if we obtain marketing approval for TOUR006 or any potential future product candidates, but we may be unable to obtain commercially reasonable product liability insurance for any products approved for marketing. Large judgments have been awarded in class action lawsuits based on drugs that had unanticipated side effects. If we are sued for any injury caused by our products, product candidates or processes, our liability could exceed our product liability insurance coverage and our total assets. Claims against us, regardless of their merit or potential outcome, may also generate negative publicity or hurt our ability to obtain physician endorsement of our products or expand our business.

Risks Related to Government Regulation

The regulatory approval processes of the FDA and comparable foreign health authorities are lengthy and inherently unpredictable. Our inability to obtain regulatory approval for TOUR006 would substantially harm our business.

Currently, we have no product candidate that has received regulatory approval and TOUR006 or any potential future product candidates is not expected to be commercially available for several years, if at all. The time required to obtain approval from the FDA and comparable foreign health authorities is unpredictable but typically takes many years following the commencement of preclinical studies and clinical trials and depends upon numerous factors, including the substantial discretion of the health authorities. In addition, approval policies, regulations or the type and amount of preclinical and clinical data necessary to gain approval may change during the course of a product candidate’s development and may vary among jurisdictions. It is possible that none of our existing or future product candidates will ever obtain regulatory approval.

TOUR006 or any of our future product candidates could fail to receive regulatory approval from the FDA or a comparable foreign health authority for many reasons, including:

disagreement with the design or implementation of our clinical trials;

failure to demonstrate that a product candidate is safe and effective for its proposed indication;

failure of results of clinical trials to meet the level of statistical significance required for approval;

failure to demonstrate that a product candidate’s clinical and other benefits outweigh its safety risks;

disagreement with our interpretation of data from preclinical studies or clinical trials;

the insufficiency of data collected from clinical trials to support the submission and filing of a Biologics License Application (“BLA”) or other submission or to obtain regulatory approval;

failure to obtain approval of the manufacturing processes or facilities of third-party manufacturers with whom we contract for clinical and commercial supplies;

unfavorable quality review or audit/inspection findings; or

changes in the United States,approval policies or regulations that render our preclinical and clinical data insufficient for approval.

The FDA or a comparable foreign health authority may require more information, including additional preclinical or clinical data, to support approval, which may delay or prevent approval and commercialization, or we may decide to abandon the development program for other reasons. For example, the FDA may require us to conduct a Phase 1 trial for TOUR006 in ASCVD. If we obtain approval, regulatory authorities may approve TOUR006 or any potential future product candidates for fewer or more limited indications than we request, may grant accelerated approval or conditional marketing authorization based on a surrogate endpoint and contingent on the successful outcome of costly and time-consuming post-marketing confirmatory clinical trials or may approve a product candidate with a label that does not include the labeling claims necessary or desirable for the successful commercialization of that product candidate.

59


We may seek fast track and/or breakthrough therapy designations or priority review for one or more of our product candidates, but we might not receive such designation or priority review, and even if Talariswe do, such designation or priority review may not lead to a faster development or regulatory review or approval process, and does Talarisnot assure FDA approval of our product candidates. Even if a product qualifies for such designation or priority review, the FDA may never obtainlater decide that the product no longer meets the conditions for qualification or may decide that the time period for FDA review or approval will not be shortened.

We may seek fast track and/or breakthrough therapy designations for one or commercializemore of our product candidates.

The FDA may issue a fast track designation to a product candidate if it is intended, whether alone or in combination with one or more other products, for the treatment of a serious or life-threatening disease or condition, and it demonstrates the potential to address unmet medical needs for such a disease or condition. Fast track designation applies to the combination of the product and the specific indication for which it is being studied. The sponsor of a new biologic may request that the FDA designate the biologic as a fast track product at any time during the clinical development of the product. For fast track products, sponsors may have greater interactions with the FDA during product development. A fast track product may also be eligible for rolling review, where the FDA may consider for review sections of the BLA on a rolling basis before the complete application is submitted, if the sponsor provides a schedule for the submission of the sections of the BLA, the FDA agrees to accept sections of the BLA and determines that the schedule is acceptable, and the sponsor pays any required user fees upon submission of the first section of the BLA. However, the FDA’s PDUFA goal for reviewing a BLA fast track application under the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (“PDUFA”) does not begin until the last section of the application is submitted. Fast track designation may be withdrawn by the FDA if the FDA believes that the designation is no longer supported by data emerging in the clinical trial process.

A breakthrough therapy is defined as a product candidate that is intended, alone or in combination with one or more other drugs, to treat a serious or life-threatening disease or condition, and preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the product candidate may demonstrate substantial improvement over existing therapies on one or more clinically significant endpoints, such as substantial treatment effects observed early in clinical development. For product candidates that have been designated as breakthrough therapies, interaction and communication between the FDA and the sponsor of the trial can help to identify the most efficient path for clinical development while minimizing the number of patients placed in ineffective control regimens. Product candidates designated as breakthrough therapies by the FDA are also eligible for priority review if supported by clinical data at the time of the submission of the BLA.

Fast track designation and breakthrough therapy designation are within the discretion of the FDA. Accordingly, even if we believe that one of our product candidates meets the criteria for any such designation, the FDA may disagree and instead determine not to make such designation. In any event, the receipt of such designation may expedite the development or approval process, but does not change the standards for approval. Even if a product qualifies for one or more of these programs, the FDA may later decide that the product no longer meets the conditions for qualification or decide that the BLA is eligible only for standard review.

In the EU, innovative products that target an unmet medical need and are expected to be of major public health interest may be eligible for a number of expedited development and review programs, such as the Priority Medicines (“PRIME”), scheme, which provides incentives similar to the breakthrough therapy designation in the U.S.

Sponsors that benefit from PRIME designation are potentially eligible for accelerated assessment of their marketing authorization applications, although this is not guaranteed. If a product for which PRIME designation was granted is the subject of an accelerated assessment, the product may be placed on the market in the EU before our product candidate with a similar therapeutic indication.

Inadequate funding for the FDA, the SEC and other jurisdiction,government agencies, including from government shutdowns, or other disruptions to these agencies’ operations, could hinder their ability to hire and retain key leadership and other personnel, prevent new products and services from being developed or commercialized in a timely manner or otherwise prevent those agencies from performing normal business functions on which the operation of our business may rely, which could negatively impact our business.

60


The ability of the FDA to review and approve new products can be affected by a variety of factors, including government budget and funding levels, the ability to hire and retain key personnel and accept the payment of user fees, and statutory, regulatory and policy changes. Average review times at the agency have fluctuated in recent years as a result. In addition, government funding of the SEC and other government agencies on which our operations may rely, including those that fund research and development activities, is subject to the political process, which is inherently fluid and unpredictable.

Disruptions at the FDA and other agencies may also slow the time necessary for new product candidates to be reviewed and/or approved by necessary government agencies, which would limit Talaris’adversely affect our business. If a prolonged government shutdown occurs, it could significantly impact the ability of the FDA to timely review and process our regulatory submissions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Further, future government shutdowns could impact our ability to realize their fullaccess the public markets and obtain necessary capital in order to properly capitalize and continue our operation.

Our failure to obtain health authority approval in foreign jurisdictions would prevent us from marketing TOUR006 or any potential future product candidates outside the U.S.

If we or our partners succeed in developing any products, we intend to market potential.

Inthem in the EU and other foreign jurisdictions in addition to regulations in the United States,U.S. In order to market and sell product candidatesour products in the EU, many Asian countries and other jurisdictions, Talariswe must obtain separate regulatorymarketing approvals and comply with numerous and varying regulatory requirements, both from a clinical and manufacturing perspective.requirements. The approval procedure varies among countries and can involve additional testing and validation and additional administrative review periods.testing. The time required to obtain approval may differ substantially from that required to obtain FDA approval. The regulatory approval process outside the United StatesU.S. generally includes all of the risks associated with obtaining FDA approval. ClinicalIn addition, in many countries outside the U.S., we must secure product pricing and reimbursement approvals before health authorities will approve the product for sale in that country. Obtaining foreign regulatory approvals and compliance with foreign regulatory requirements could result in significant delays, difficulties and costs for us and could delay or prevent the introduction of our products in certain countries. Further, clinical trials acceptedconducted in one country may not be accepted by regulatoryhealth authorities in other countries. In addition, many countries outside the United States require that a product be approved for reimbursement before it can be approved for sale in that country. A product candidate that has been approved for sale in a particular country may not receive reimbursementand regulatory approval in that country. Talaris may not be able to obtain approvals from regulatory authorities or payor authorities outside the United States on a timely basis, if at all. Approval by the FDAone country does not ensure approval by regulatory or payor authorities in other countries or jurisdictions, and approval by one regulatory or payor authority outside the United States does not ensure approval by regulatory authorities in other countries or jurisdictions or by the FDA. Talaris may not be able to file for regulatory approvals and may not receive necessary approvals to commercialize Talaris’ products in any market.other country, while a failure or delay in obtaining regulatory approval in one country may have a negative effect on the regulatory approval process in others. If Talaris is unablewe fail to obtain approval of TOUR006 or any potential future product candidates by regulatory or payorhealth authorities in the EU, Asia or elsewhere,another country, we will be unable to commercialize our product in that country, and the commercial prospects of that product candidate may be significantly diminished. Talaris does not have any product candidates approved for sale in any jurisdiction, including international markets, and Talaris does not have experience in obtainingour business prospects could decline. In addition, failure to obtain regulatory approval in international markets. If Talaris fails to comply with regulatory requirements in international marketsone country or to obtain and maintain required approvals, or ifregion could adversely affect future regulatory approvals in international markets are delayed, Talaris’ target market will be reduced and Talaris’ ability to realize the full market potential of Talaris’ products will be unrealized.other countries.

Even if Talaris pursues the development ofTOUR006 and any potential future product candidates and receivesreceive regulatory approval, Talaristhey will still face extensive ongoing regulatory requirements, and continued regulatory review, which may result in significant additional expense,expenses, and Talaris’ products may still face future development and regulatory difficulties.

Even if Talaris obtainswe obtain regulatory approval for a product candidate, it would be subject to ongoing requirements by the FDA and comparable foreign regulatoryhealth authorities governing the manufacture, quality control, further development, labeling, packaging, storage, distribution, adverse event reporting, safety surveillance, import, export, advertising, promotion, recordkeeping and reporting of safety and other post-marketingpost-market information. TheseWe will be subject to ongoing requirements, includeincluding submissions of safety and other post-marketing information, and reports, establishment registration and product listing as well asrequirements, requirements relating to current cGMP, applicable product tracking and tracing requirements, quality control, quality assurance and corresponding maintenance of records and documents, and recordkeeping. We will also need to ensure continued compliance by Talarisit and/or any future CDMOscontract manufacturing organizations and CROs for any post-approval clinical trials that Talaris conducts. Thewe conduct. Even if marketing approval of a product candidate is granted, the approval may be subject to limitations on the indicated uses for which the product may be marketed or to conditions of approval, or contain requirements for costly post-marketing testing and surveillance to monitor the safety or efficacy of the product. Additionally, under the Food and Drug Omnibus Reform Act of 2022, sponsors of approved drugs and biologics must provide 6 months’ notice to the FDA of any changes in marketing status, such as the withdrawal of a drug, and failure to do so could result in the FDA placing the product on a list of discontinued products, which would revoke the product’s ability to be marketed.

61


Even after approval, the FDA and comparable foreign health authorities will continue to closely monitor the safety profile of any product will continue to be closely monitored by the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authoritieseven after approval. If the FDA or comparable foreign regulatoryhealth authorities become aware of new safety information after approval of TOUR006 and any of Talaris’potential future product candidates, they may require labeling changes or establishment of a REMS, or similar strategy, impose significant restrictions on a product’s indicated uses or marketing or impose ongoing requirements for potentially costly post-approval studies or post-market surveillance. Failure to comply with any related obligations may result in the suspension or withdrawal of an obtained approval and in civil and/or criminal penalties. Receipt of approval for narrower indications than sought, restrictions on marketing through a REMS or similar strategy imposed by the FDA or in an EU member state or other foreign country, or significant labeling restrictions or requirements in an approved label such as a black boxed warning could have a negative impact on our ability to recoup our R&D costs and to successfully commercialize that product, any of which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects. In any event, if we are unable to comply with our post-marketing obligations imposed as part of the marketing approvals in the U.S., the EU, or other countries, our approval may be varied, suspended or revoked, product supply may be delayed and our sales of our products could be materially adversely affected.

In addition, manufacturers of cell therapiesdrug substance and drug product and their facilities are subject to initial and continual review and periodic inspections by the FDA and other regulatorycomparable foreign health authorities for compliance with current good manufacturing practices (“cGMP”), good clinical practices (“GCP”), current good tissue practices (“cGTP”), and othercGMP, regulations. For certain commercial prescription and biologic products, manufacturers and other parties involved in the supply chain must also meet chain of distribution requirements and build electronic, interoperable systems for product tracking and tracing and for notifying the FDA of counterfeit, diverted, stolen and intentionally adulterated products or other products that are otherwise unfit for distribution in the United States. If Talariswe or a regulatory agency discover previously unknown problems with a product, such as adverse events of unanticipated severity or

44


frequency, or problems with the facility where the product is manufactured, a regulatory agency may impose restrictions on that product, the manufacturing facility or Talaris,us, including requiring recall or withdrawal of the product from the market or suspension of manufacturing. Manufacturers and other parties involved in the drug supply chain for prescription drug products must also comply with product tracking and tracing requirements and for notifying the FDA of counterfeit, diverted, stolen and intentionally adulterated products or products that are otherwise unfit for distribution in the U.S. If Talaris, Talaris’ product candidateswe or the manufacturing facilities for Talaris’TOUR006 or any potential future product candidates fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, or if TOUR006 or any potential future product candidates are found to cause undesirable or unacceptable side effects, a regulatory agency may:

issue warning letters or untitled letters;

issue safety alerts, Dear Healthcare Provider letters, press releases or other communications containing warnings about such product;

mandate modifications to promotional materials or require Talaris

issue warning letters or untitled letters;

mandate modifications to promotional materials or require us to provide corrective information to healthcare practitioners, or require other restrictions on the labeling or marketing of such products;

require Talaris to enter into a consent decree, which can include imposition of various fines, reimbursements for inspection costs, required due dates for specific actions and penalties for noncompliance;

seek an injunction or impose civil or criminal penalties or monetary fines;

suspend, withdraw or modify regulatory approval;

suspend or modify any ongoing clinical trials;

refuse to approve pending applications or supplements to applications filed by Talaris;

suspend or impose restrictions on operations, including costly new manufacturing requirements; or

seize or detain products, refuse to permit the import or export of products, or require Talaris to initiate a product recall.

Should Talaris resume the developmentlabelling or marketing of biopharmaceutical product candidates,such products;

require that we conduct and complete post-marketing studies;

require us to enter into a consent decree, which can include imposition of various fines, reimbursements for inspection costs, required due dates for specific actions and penalties for noncompliance;

seek an injunction or impose civil or criminal penalties or monetary fines;

suspend marketing of, withdraw or modify regulatory approval of or initiate a recall of such product;

suspend or modify any ongoing clinical trials;

refuse to approve pending applications or supplements to applications filed by us;

suspend or impose restrictions on operations, including costly new manufacturing requirements; or

seize or detain products or refuse to permit the import or export of products.

The occurrence of any event or penalty described above may inhibit Talaris’our ability to successfully commercialize Talaris’ products.our products and generate revenue.

62


Advertising and promotion of any product candidate that obtains approval in the United StatesU.S. will be heavily scrutinized by the FDA, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”), the Office of Inspector General (“OIG”) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”),DOJ, HHS, OIG, state attorneys general, members of the U.S. Congress and the public. Additionally, advertising andViolations, including promotion of any product candidate that obtains approval outside of the United States will be heavily scrutinized by comparable foreign entities and stakeholders. Violations, including actual or alleged promotion of Talaris’our products for unapproved or off-label(or off-label) uses, are subject to enforcement letters, inquiries and investigations and civil and criminal sanctions by the FDA or comparable foreign bodies.government. Any actual or alleged failure to comply with labeling and promotion requirements may result in fines, warning letters, mandates to corrective information to healthcare practitioners, injunctions, or civil or criminal penalties.

The FDA Additionally, comparable foreign health authorities, public prosecutors, industry associations, healthcare professionals and other regulatory authorities’members of the public will heavily scrutinize advertising and promotion of any product candidate outside of the U.S.

In the U.S., engaging in the impermissible promotion of our products for off-label uses can subject us to false claims litigation under federal and state statutes, which can lead to civil and criminal penalties and fines and agreements that materially restrict the manner in which a company promotes or distributes drug products. These false claims statutes include the federal FCA, which allows any individual to bring a lawsuit against a pharmaceutical company on behalf of the federal government alleging submission of false or fraudulent claims, or causing to present such false or fraudulent claims, for payment by a federal program such as Medicare or Medicaid. If the government prevails in the lawsuit, the individual will share in any fines or settlement funds. Since 2004, these FCA lawsuits against pharmaceutical companies have increased significantly in volume and breadth, leading to several substantial civil and criminal settlements regarding certain sales practices promoting off-label drug uses involving fines in excess of $1 billion. This growth in litigation has increased the risk that a pharmaceutical company will have to defend a false claim action, pay settlement fines or restitution, agree to comply with burdensome reporting and compliance obligations and be excluded from Medicare, Medicaid and other federal and state healthcare programs. If we do not lawfully promote our approved products, we may become subject to such litigation and, if we do not successfully defend against such actions, those actions may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The FDA’s policies may change, and additional government regulations may be enacted that could prevent, limit or delay regulatory approval of TOUR006 or any current orpotential future product candidate. Talaris cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative action, either in the United States or abroad.candidates. If Talaris iswe are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or to the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if Talaris iswe are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, Talariswe may lose any marketing approval that Talariswe may have obtained. Non-compliance by Talarisobtained, which would adversely affect our business, prospects and ability to achieve or any future collaborator with regulatory requirements, including safety monitoring or pharmacovigilance,sustain profitability.

In the EU, the advertising and with requirements related to the developmentpromotion of medicinal products for the pediatric population can also result in significant financial penalties.

Risks Related to Healthcare Legislation and Reform

Talaris’ relationships with customers, third-party payors, physicians and healthcare providers will beare subject to applicable anti-kickback, fraudboth EU and abuse, and otherEU member state laws and regulations, which could expose Talaris to criminal sanctions, civil penalties, contractual damages, reputational harm, and diminished profits.

Healthcare providers, physicians and third-party payors will play a primary role in the recommendation and prescriptiongoverning promotion of any product candidates for which Talaris obtains regulatory approval. Physicians, hospitals and third-party payors are often slow to adopt newmedicinal products, technologies and treatment practices that require additional upfront costs and training. Additionally, third-party payors may not cover, or provide adequate reimbursement for, long-term follow-up evaluations required following the use of Talaris’ products. Patients are unlikely to use Talaris’ product candidates unless insurance coverage is provided, and reimbursement is adequate, to cover a significant portion of the cost of Talaris’ product candidates because patients generally rely on third-party payors to reimburse all or part of the costs associated with their treatment. Adequate coverage and reimbursement from governmental healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, and commercial payors is critical to new product acceptance. There is also significant uncertainty related to the insurance coverage and reimbursement of newly approved products and coverage may be more limited than the purposes for which the medicine is approved by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities. In the United States, the principal decisions about reimbursement for new medicines are typically made by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”), an agency within the HHS. CMS decides whether and to what extent a new medicine will be covered and reimbursed under Medicare and private payors tend to follow CMS to a substantial degree. Factors payors consider in determining reimbursement are based on whether the product is (i) a covered benefit under the payor’s health plan; (ii) safe, effective and medically necessary; (iii) appropriate for the specific patient; (iv) cost-effective; and (v) neither experimental nor investigational.

45


If Talaris’ product candidates have a higher cost of goods than conventional therapies, and require long-term follow-up evaluations, the risk that coverage and reimbursement rates may be inadequate for Talaris to achieve profitability may be greater. Based on these and other factors, hospitals, physicians and payors may decide that the benefits of this new therapy do not or will not outweigh its costs. Talaris’ arrangements with third parties may expose Talaris to broadly applicable federal and varied state fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations that may constrain the business or financial arrangements and relationships through which Talaris conducts research as well as markets, sells and distributes its products. As a pharmaceutical company, even though Talaris does not and will not control referrals of healthcare services or bill directly to Medicare, Medicaid or other third-party payors, federal and state healthcare laws and regulations pertaining to fraud and abuse and patients’ rights are, and will be, applicable to Talaris’ business. Restrictions under applicable federal and state healthcare laws and regulations that may affect Talaris’ ability to operate include, but are not limited to, the following:

the federal healthcare Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, persons and entities from knowingly and willfully soliciting, offering, receiving, paying or providing remuneration, directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind, to induce or reward, or in return for, either the referral of an individual for, or the purchase, lease, order, arrangement, or recommendation of, any good, facility, item or service, for which payment may be made, in whole or in part, under a federal healthcare program such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs. A person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute or specific intent to violate it to have committed a violation. Violations are subject to civil and criminal fines and penalties for each violation, plus up to three times the remuneration involved, imprisonment, and exclusion from government healthcare programs. In addition, the government may assert that a claim including items or services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the federal False Claims Act (the “FCA”) or federal civil monetary penalties. This statute has been interpreted to apply to arrangements between pharmaceutical manufacturers on the one hand, and prescribers, purchasers and formulary managers, among others, on the other;

federal civil and criminal false claims laws, including the FCA, and the civil monetary penalties law, which prohibit, among other things, individuals or entities from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, false or fraudulent claims for payment to, or approval by, Medicare, Medicaid, or other federal healthcare programs, knowingly making, using or causing to be made or used a false record or statement material to a false or fraudulent claim or obligation to pay or transmit money or property to the federal government, or knowingly concealing or knowingly and improperly avoiding or decreasing or concealing an obligation to pay money to the federal government. Manufacturers can be held liable under the FCA even when they do not submit claims directly to government payors if they are deemed to “cause” the submission of false or fraudulent claims. In addition, the government may assert that a claim including items or services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the federal FCA. The FCA also permits a private individual acting as a “whistleblower” to bring actions on behalf of the federal government alleging violations of the FCA and to share in any monetary recovery;

the federal beneficiary inducement statute, includes, without limitation, any transfer of items or services for free or for less than fair market value (with limited exceptions), to a Medicare or Medicaid beneficiary that the person knows or should know is likely to influence the beneficiary’s selection of a particular supplier of items or services reimbursable by a federal or state governmental program;

the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”), which created additional federal criminal statutes that prohibit knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program or obtain, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, any of the money or property owned by, or under the custody or control of, any healthcare benefit program, regardless of the payor (e.g., public or private) and knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or making any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements in connection with the delivery of or payment for healthcare benefits, items or services relating to healthcare matters. Similar to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, a person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation;

HIPAA, as amended by as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009 (“HITECH”) and their respective implementing regulations, including the Final Omnibus Rule published in January 2013, which impose requirements on certain covered healthcare providers, health plans, and healthcare clearinghouses as well as their respective business associates, independent contractors or agents of covered entities, that perform services for them that involve the creation, maintenance, receipt, use, or disclosure of, individually identifiable health information as well as their covered subcontractors relating to the privacy, security and transmission of individually identifiable health information. HITECH also created new tiers of civil monetary penalties, amended HIPAA to make civil and criminal penalties directly applicable to business associates, and gave state attorneys general new authority to file civil actions for damages or injunctions in federal court to enforce the federal HIPAA laws and seek attorneys’ fees and costs associated with pursuing federal civil actions. In addition, there may be additional federal, state and non-U.S. laws which govern the privacy and security of health and other personal information in certain circumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and may not have the same effect, thus complicating compliance efforts;

46


the federal transparency requirements under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (collectively, the “ACA”), including the provision commonly referred to as the Physician Payments Sunshine Act (the “Sunshine Act”), and its implementing regulations, which requires manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies for which payment is available under Medicare, Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program (with certain exceptions) to report annually to the CMS information related to payments or other transfers of value to physicians (defined to include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists and chiropractors), and teaching hospitals, as well as ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family members. As of January 1, 2022, these reporting obligations now extend to include transfers of value by manufacturers that are made to physician assistants, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, anesthesiologist assistants, certified registered nurse anesthetists and certified nurse midwives;

federal price reporting laws, which require manufacturers to calculate and report complex pricing metrics to government programs, where such reported prices may be used in the calculation of reimbursement and/or discounts on approved products;

Federal consumer protection and unfair competition laws, which broadly regulate marketplace activities and activities that potentially harm consumers; and

analogous state and foreign law equivalents of each of the above federal laws, such as anti-kickback and false claims laws which may apply to items or services reimbursed by any third-party payor, including commercial insurers or patients; state laws that require pharmaceutical companies to comply with the industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines and the applicable compliance guidance promulgated by the federal government or otherwise restrict payments that may be made to healthcare providers and other potential referral sources; state and local laws that require the licensure of sales representatives; and state laws that require drug manufacturers to report information related to payments and other transfers of value to physicians and other healthcare providers or marketing expenditures and pricing information. In addition, some states have passed laws that require pharmaceutical companies to comply with the April 2003 Office of Inspector General Compliance Program Guidance for Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and/or the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America’s (“PhRMA”) Code on Interactions with Healthcare Professionals.

Efforts to ensure that Talaris’ business arrangements with third parties, and Talaris’ business generally, continue to comply with applicable healthcare laws and regulations will involve substantial costs. It is possible that governmental authorities will conclude that Talaris’ business practices do not comply with any such laws and regulations. If Talaris’ operations, including Talaris’ arrangementsinteractions with physicians and other healthcare providers,professionals, misleading and comparative advertising and unfair commercial practices. Although general requirements for advertising and promotion of medicinal products are foundestablished under EU directives, the details are governed by regulations in each member state and can differ from one country to beanother. For example, applicable laws require that promotional materials and advertising in violationrelation to medicinal products comply with the product’s Summary of any suchProduct Characteristics (“SmPC”), as approved by the competent authorities in connection with a marketing authorization. The SmPC is the document that provides information to physicians concerning the safe and effective use of the product. Promotional activity that does not comply with the SmPC is considered off-label and is prohibited in the EU. Direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medicinal products is also prohibited in the EU.

Failure to comply with EU, EU member state, and other country laws or any other governmental regulations that may apply to Talaris, Talaristhe conduct of clinical trials, manufacturing approval, marketing authorization of medicinal products and marketing of such products, both before and after grant of a marketing authorization, or with other applicable regulatory requirements, may result in administrative, civil or criminal penalties. These penalties could include delays or refusal to authorize the conduct of clinical trials, or to grant marketing authorization, product withdrawals and recalls, product seizures, suspension, withdrawal or variation of the marketing authorization, total or partial suspension of production, distribution, manufacturing or clinical trials, operating restrictions, injunctions, suspension of licenses, fines and criminal penalties. In addition, directives adopted at the EU level may be subject to significant civil, criminalimplemented differently by individual member states. These directives, and administrative penalties, damages, fines, imprisonment, reputational harm, exclusion from government-funded healthcare programs, such as Medicaretheir differing implementations in member states, increase our legal and Medicaid, disgorgement, additional reporting requirements, and/or the curtailment or restructuring of Talaris’ operations, as well as additional reporting obligations oversight if Talaris becomes subject to a corporate integrity agreement or other agreement to resolve allegations of non-compliance with these laws. If any physicians or other healthcare providers or entities with whom Talaris expects to do business are found to not be infinancial compliance with applicable laws, theycosts and may be subject to similar penalties.make some activities more time-consuming and expensive.

63


Healthcare legislative measures aimed at reducingreform may negatively impact our ability to profitably sell TOUR006 and any potential future product candidates, if approved.

Third-party payors, whether domestic or foreign, or governmental or commercial, are developing increasingly sophisticated methods of controlling healthcare costs maycosts. The U.S. and many foreign jurisdictions have a material adverse effect on Talaris’ business and results of operations.

In the United States, there have been a number ofenacted or proposed legislative and regulatory changes and proposed changes regardingaffecting the healthcare system that could prevent or delay regulatorymarketing approval of TOUR006 or any potential future product candidates, restrict or regulate post-approval activities and affect Talaris’our ability to profitably sell any product candidates for which Talaris obtains regulatorywe obtain marketing approval. Talaris expects that current laws, as well as

For example, on July 9, 2021, President Biden issued an executive order directing the FDA to, among other healthcare reform measures that may be adopted inthings, continue to clarify and improve the future, may result in additional reductions inapproval framework for generic drugs and biosimilars, including the standards for interchangeability of biological products, facilitate the development and approval of biosimilar and interchangeable products, clarify existing requirements and procedures related to the review and submission of BLAs, and identify and address any efforts to impede generic drug and biosimilar competition.

Additionally, on August 16, 2022, President Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (the “IRA”), into law, which among other things, (1) directs the HHS, to negotiate the price of certain single-source drugs and biologics covered under Medicare and other healthcare funding, more rigorous coverage criteria, new payment methodologies(2) imposes rebates under Medicare Part B and in additional downward pressure onMedicare Part D to penalize price increases that outpace inflation. The IRA includes certain exemptions to the price negotiation program, including a limited exemption for products with orphan drug designation. This exemption applies only to products with one orphan drug designation that Talaris,is (i) for a rare disease or any collaborators,condition and (ii) is approved for indication(s) for such rare disease or condition. By limiting price negotiation exemption to products with only one orphan drug designation, the IRA may receivedecrease our interest in pursuing orphan drug designation for any approved products.

There have been,our product candidates in multiple indications. The IRA also, among other things, extends enhanced subsidies for individuals purchasing health insurance coverage in ACA marketplaces through plan year 2025 and likelyeliminates the “donut hole” under the Medicare Part D program beginning in 2025 by significantly lowering the beneficiary maximum out-of-pocket cost through a newly established manufacturer discount program. These provisions will take effect progressively starting in fiscal year 2023, although the Medicare drug pricing negotiation program is currently subject to legal challenges. The IRA permits HHS to implement many of these provisions through guidance, as opposed to regulation, for the initial years. HHS has and will continue to issue and update guidance as these programs are implemented. It is currently unclear how the IRA will be legislative and regulatory proposals atimplemented but is likely to have a significant impact on the foreign, federal and state levels directed at broadening the availability of healthcare and containing or lowering the cost of healthcare. The implementation of cost containment measures or other healthcare reforms may prevent Talaris from being able to generate revenue, attain profitability, or commercialize Talaris’ product candidates. Such reforms could have an adverse effect on anticipated revenue from product candidates that Talaris may successfully develop and for which Talaris may obtain regulatory approval and may affect Talaris’ overall financial condition and ability to develop product candidates.

For example,pharmaceutical industry. Further, in March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act, collectively referred to as the ACA, was enacted, in the United States. The ACAwhich includes measures that have significantly changed and are expected to continue to significantly change, the way healthcarehealth care is financed by both governmental and private insurers. Among the provisions of the ACA of greatest importance to the pharmaceutical industry are that the ACA: made several changes to the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program, including increasing pharmaceutical manufacturers’ rebate liability by raising the minimum basic Medicaid rebate on average manufacturer price (“AMP”) on most branded prescription drugs and adding a new rebate calculation for “line extensions” (i.e., new formulations, such as extended release formulations) of solid oral dosage forms of branded products, as well as potentially impacting their rebate liability by modifying the statutory definition of AMP; imposed a requirement on manufacturers of branded drugs to provide a 50% point-of-sale discount (increased to 70% pursuant to the Bipartisan Budget Act

47


of 2018, effective as of January 1, 2019) off the negotiated price of branded drugs dispensed to Medicare Part D beneficiaries in the coverage gap (i.e., “donut hole”) as a condition for a manufacturer’s outpatient drugs being covered under Medicare Part D;

extended a manufacturer’s Medicaid rebate liability to covered drugs dispensed to individuals who are enrolled in Medicaid managed care organizations;

expanded the entities eligible for discounts under the 340B Drug Discount Program;

established a new methodology by which rebates owed by manufacturers under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program are calculated for drugs that are inhaled, infused, instilled, implanted, or injected;

imposed an annual, nondeductible fee on any entity that manufactures or imports certain branded prescription drugs, apportioned among these entities according to their market share in certain government healthcare programs, and

established the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute to oversee, identify priorities in, and conduct comparative clinical effectiveness research, along with funding for such research. The research conducted by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute may affect the market for certain pharmaceutical products. The ACA established the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation within CMS to test innovative payment and service delivery models to lower Medicare and Medicaid spending, potentially including prescription drug spending. Funding has been allocated to support the mission of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation through 2019.

Since its enactment, thereThere have been numerousexecutive, judicial administrative, executive, and legislativecongressional challenges to certain aspects of the ACA. While Congress has not passed comprehensive legislation repealing the ACA, such legislation may be reintroduced. Members of Congress have introduced legislation to modify or replace certain provisions of the ACA. It is unclear how these efforts to repeal and/or replace the ACA will impact the ACA and Talaris expects that there will be additional challengesour business. For example, the Tax Cuts and amendments toJobs Act (the “2017 Tax Act”), repealed the tax-based shared responsibility payment imposed by the ACA inon certain individuals who fail to maintain qualifying health coverage that is commonly referred to as the future.“individual mandate.” On June 17, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed the most recent judiciala challenge toon procedural grounds that argued the ACA broughtis unconstitutional in its entirety because the “individual mandate” was repealed by several states without specifically ruling on the constitutionality of the ACA.Congress. Prior to the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision,Court ruling, on January 28, 2021, President Biden issued an executive order to initiatethat initiated a special enrollment period from February 15, 2021 through August 15, 2021 for purposes of obtaining health insurance coverage through the ACA marketplace. The executive order also instructed certain governmental agencies to review and reconsider their existing policies and rules that limit access to healthcare, including among others, reexamining Medicaid demonstration projects and waiver programs that include work requirements, and policies that create unnecessary barriers to obtaining access to health insurance coverage through Medicaid or the ACA. It is possible that the ACA and IRA may be subject to judicial or Congressional challenges in the future. It is unclear how otherany additional healthcare reform measures may impact the ACA or IRA, increase the pressure on drug pricing or limit the availability of coverage and adequate reimbursement for TOUR006 and any potential future product candidates, which would adversely affect our business.

There has also been increasing executive, legislative and enforcement interest in the U.S. with respect to drug pricing practices. There have been U.S. congressional inquiries, presidential executive orders and proposed and enacted legislation designed to, among other things, bring more transparency to drug pricing, reduce the cost of prescription drugs under Medicare, review the relationship between pricing and manufacturer patient programs and reform government program reimbursement methodologies for drugs. For example, in an executive order, the

64


administration of President Biden expressed its intent to pursue certain policy initiatives to reduce drug prices and, in response, HHS released a Comprehensive Plan for Addressing High Drug Prices that outlines principles for drug pricing reform and sets out a variety of potential legislative policies that Congress could pursue to lower drug prices. Further, in response to the Biden administration or other efforts, ifadministration’s October 2022 executive order, on February 14, 2023, HHS released a report outlining three new models for testing by the CMS, Innovation Center which will be evaluated on their ability to lower the cost of drugs, promote accessibility, and improve the quality of care. It is unclear whether the models will be utilized in any to challenge, repeal or replacehealth reform measures in the ACA will impact Talaris’ business. In addition, other legislative and regulatory changesfuture. We expect that the healthcare reform measures that have been proposedadopted and may be adopted in the United States sincefuture may result in more rigorous coverage criteria and additional downward pressure on the ACA was enacted:price that we receive for any approved product and could seriously harm its future revenues. Any reduction in reimbursement from Medicare or other government programs may result in a similar reduction in payments from private payors. The implementation of cost containment measures or other healthcare reforms may prevent us from being able to generate revenue, attain profitability or commercialize our products.

On August 2, 2011, the U.S. Budget Control Act of 2011, among other things, included aggregate reductions of Medicare payments to providers of 2% per fiscal year, which remain in effect through 2031. Due to the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, estimated budget deficit increases resulting from the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, and subsequent legislation, Medicare payments to providers will be further reduced starting in 2025 absent further legislation.

On January 2, 2013, the U.S. American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 was signed into law, which, among other things, further reduced Medicare payments to several types of providers and increased the statute of limitations period for the government to recover overpayments to providers from three to five years.

On April 13, 2017, CMS published a final rule that gives states greater flexibility in setting benchmarks for insurers in the individual and small group marketplaces, which may have the effect of relaxing the essential health benefits required under the ACA for plans sold through such marketplaces.

On May 30, 2018, the Right to Try Act, was signed into law. The law, among other things, provides a federal framework for certain patients to access certain investigational new drug products that have completed a Phase 1 clinical trial and that are undergoing investigation for FDA approval. Under certain circumstances, eligible patients can seek treatment without enrolling in clinical trials and without obtaining FDA permission under the FDA expanded access program. There is no obligation for a pharmaceutical manufacturer to make its drug products available to eligible patients as a result of the Right to Try Act.

On May 23, 2019, CMS published a final rule to allow Medicare Advantage Plans the option of using step therapy for Part B drugs beginning January 1, 2020.

On December 20, 2019, former President Trump signed into law the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, which repealed the Cadillac tax, the health insurance provider tax, and the medical device excise tax. It is impossible to determine whether similar taxes could be instated in the future.

On March 11, 2021, President Biden signed the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 into law, which eliminates the statutory Medicaid drug rebate cap, currently set at 100% of a drug’s AMP, for single source and innovator multiple source drugs, beginning January 1, 2024.

There have been, and likely will continue to be, legislative and regulatory proposals at the foreign, federal and state levels directed at broadening the availability of healthcare and containing or lowering the cost of healthcare. Should Talaris resume the development of biopharmaceutical product candidates, the implementation of cost containment measures or other healthcare reforms may prevent Talaris from being able to

48


generate revenue, attain profitability, or commercialize Talaris’ product. Such reforms could have an adverse effect on anticipated revenue from TOUR006 and any potential future product candidates that Talariswe may successfully develop and for which Talariswe may obtain regulatory approval and may affect Talaris’our overall financial condition and ability to develop product candidates.

Additionally, there has beenIn many countries outside the U.S., government-sponsored healthcare systems are the primary payors for drugs. With increasing legislativebudgetary constraints and/or difficulty in understanding the value of medicines, governments and enforcement interestpayors in many countries are applying a variety of measures to exert downward price pressure and we expect that legislators, policy makers and healthcare insurance funds in the UnitedEU Member States will continue to propose and implement cost cutting measures. These measures include mandatory price controls, price referencing, therapeutic-reference pricing, increases in mandates, incentives for generic substitution and biosimilar usage, government-mandated price cuts, limitations on coverage of target population and introduction of volume caps.

Many countries implement health technology assessment (“HTA”), procedures that use formal economic metrics such as cost-effectiveness to determine prices, coverage and reimbursement of new therapies. These assessments are increasingly implemented in established and emerging markets. In the EU, Regulation (EU) 2021/2282 on Health Technology Assessment, which will become effective on January 12, 2025, will allow EU member states to use common HTA tools, methodologies and procedures to conduct joint clinical assessments and joint scientific consultations whereby HTA authorities may provide advice to health technology developers. Each EU member state will, however, remain exclusively competent for assessing the relative effectiveness of health technologies and making pricing and reimbursement decisions. Given that the extent to which pricing and reimbursement decisions are influenced by the HTA process currently varies between EU member states, it is possible that our products may be subject to favorable pricing and reimbursement status only in certain EU countries. If we are unable to maintain favorable pricing and reimbursement status in EU member states that represent significant markets, including following periodic review, our anticipated revenue from and growth prospects for our products in the EU could be negatively affected. Moreover, in order to obtain reimbursement for our products in some EU member states, we may be required to compile additional data comparing the cost-effectiveness of our products to other available therapies. Efforts to generate additional data for the HTA process will involve additional expenses which may substantially increase the cost of commercializing and marketing our products in certain EU member states.

We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of healthcare reform initiatives that may arise from future legislation or administrative action. However, it is possible that countries will continue taking aggressive actions to seek to reduce expenditures on drugs. Similarly, fiscal constraints may also affect the extent to which countries are willing to approve new and innovative therapies and/or allow access to new technologies.

If we or any third parties we may engage are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we or such third parties are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, our product candidates may lose any regulatory approval that may have been obtained and we may not achieve or sustain profitability.

Our relationships with respecthealthcare providers, customers and third-party payors will be subject to drug pricing practices. Specifically, there has been heightened governmental scrutiny overapplicable anti-kickback, fraud and abuse, transparency and other healthcare laws and regulations, which, if violated, could expose us to criminal sanctions, civil penalties, contractual damages, reputational harm, administrative burdens and diminished profits and future earnings.

65


Healthcare providers, including physicians, and third-party payors will play a primary role in the manner inrecommendation and prescription of any product candidates for which manufacturers set priceswe or our partner obtains marketing approval. Our arrangements with healthcare providers, third-party payors and customers may expose us to broadly applicable fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations that may constrain the business or financial arrangements and relationships through which we research, market, sell and distribute products for their marketed products, which has resulted in several U.S. Congressional inquiries and proposed and enactedwe or our partner obtain marketing approval. Restrictions under applicable federal and state legislation designed to,healthcare laws and regulations, include the following:

the federal Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits persons from, among other things, bring more transparencyknowingly and willfully soliciting, offering, receiving or providing remuneration, directly or indirectly, in cash or in kind, to drug pricing, reduceinduce or reward, or in return for, the costreferral of prescription drugsan individual for the furnishing or arranging for the furnishing, or the purchase, lease or order, or arranging for or recommending purchase, lease or order, of any good or service for which payment may be made under a federal healthcare program, such as Medicare and reviewMedicaid. A person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the relationship between pricingfederal Anti-Kickback Statute or specific intent to violate it to have committed a violation. Violations are subject to civil and manufacturer patientcriminal fines and penalties for each violation, plus up to three times the remuneration involved, imprisonment, and exclusion from government healthcare programs. In addition, the government may assert that a claim including items or services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the federal FCA or federal civil monetary penalties;

the FCA imposes criminal and civil penalties, including through civil whistleblower or qui tam actions, against individuals or entities for knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, to the federal government, claims for payment that are false or fraudulent or making a false statement to avoid, decrease or conceal an obligation to pay money to the federal government. Manufacturers can be held liable under the FCA even when they do not submit claims directly to government payors if they are deemed to “cause” the submission of false or fraudulent claims. The FCA also permits a private individual acting as a “whistleblower” to bring actions on behalf of the federal government alleging violations of the FCA and to share in any monetary recovery;

HIPAA, imposes criminal liability for knowingly and willfully executing a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program, knowingly and willfully embezzling or stealing from a healthcare benefit program, willfully obstructing a criminal investigation of a healthcare offense or knowingly and willfully making false statements relating to healthcare matters. Similar to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, a person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation;

AtHIPAA, as amended by the federal level, President Biden signed an Executive Order on July 9, 2021 affirming the administration’s policy to (i) support legislative reforms that would lower the prices of prescription drugs and biologics, including by allowing Medicare to negotiate drug prices, by imposing inflation caps, and by supporting the development and market entry of lower-cost generic drugs and biosimilars; and (ii) support the enactment of a public health insurance option. Among other things, the Executive Order also directs HHS to provide a report on actions to combat excessive pricing of prescription drugs, enhance the domestic drug supply chain, reduce the price that the Federal government pays for drugs, and address price gouging in the industry; and directs the FDA to work with states and Indian Tribes that propose to develop section 804 Importation Programs in accordance with the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003, and the FDA’s implementing regulations. FDA released such implementing regulations on September 24, 2020, which went into effect on November 30, 2020, providing guidance for states to build and submit importation plans for drugs from Canada. On September 25, 2020, CMS stated drugs imported by states under this rule will not be eligible for federal rebates under Section 1927 of the Social Security Act and manufacturers would not report these drugs for “best price” or AMP purposes. Since these drugs are not considered covered outpatient drugs, CMS further stated it will not publish a National Average Drug Acquisition Cost for these drugs. If implemented, importation of drugs from Canada may materially and adversely affect the price Talaris receives for any product candidates.

On November 20, 2020, CMS issued an Interim Final Rule implementing the most favored nations model (“MFN”) model under which Medicare Part B reimbursement rates would have been calculated for certain drugs and biologicals based on the lowest price drug manufacturers receive in OrganizationHealth Information Technology for Economic Cooperation and Development countries with a similar gross domestic product per capita. However,Clinical Health Act (“HITECH”), also imposes obligations on December 29, 2021, CMS rescindedcertain covered entity healthcare providers, health plans and healthcare clearinghouses, and their business associates that perform certain services involving the MFN rule.

Additionally, on November 30, 2020, HHS published a regulation removing safe harbor protection for price reductions from pharmaceutical manufacturers to plan sponsors under Part D, either directlyuse or through pharmacy benefit managers, unless the price reduction is required by law. The rule also creates a new safe harbor for price reductions reflected at the point-of-sale,disclosure of individually identifiable health information as well as a safe harbortheir covered subcontractors, including mandatory contractual terms, with respect to safeguarding the privacy, security, processing and transmission of individually identifiable health information. HITECH also created new tiers of civil monetary penalties, amended HIPAA to make civil and criminal penalties directly applicable to business associates, and gave state attorneys general new authority to file civil actions for damages or injunctions in federal courts to enforce the federal HIPAA laws and seek attorneys’ fees and costs associated with pursuing federal civil actions. In addition, there may be additional federal, state and non-U.S. laws which govern the privacy and security of health and other personal information in certain fixed fee arrangements between pharmacy benefit managerscircumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and manufacturers. Pursuant to court order,may not have the removal and addition of the aforementioned safe harbors were delayed and recent legislation imposed a moratorium on implementation of the rule until January 1, 2026. This deadline was pushed back further to January 1, 2027 by the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act and could potentially be pushed back to January 1, 2032 by the Inflation Reduction Act.same effect, thus complicating compliance efforts;

Further, on December 31, 2020, CMS published a new rule, effective January 1, 2023, requiring manufacturers to ensure the full value of co-pay assistance is passed on to the patient or these dollars will count toward the AMP and Best Price calculation of the drug. On May 17, 2022, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia granted the PhRMA motion for summary judgment invalidating the accumulator adjustment rule.

The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, (the “IRA”) includes several provisions that may impact Talaris’ business to varying degrees, including provisions that reduce the out-of-pocket spending cap for Medicare Part D beneficiaries from $7,050 to $2,000 starting in 2025, thereby effectively eliminating the coverage gap; impose new manufacturer financial liability on certain drugs under Medicare Part D, allow the U.S. government to negotiate Medicare Part B and Part D price caps for certain high-cost drugs and biologics without generic or biosimilar competition; require companies to pay rebates to Medicare for certain drug prices that increase faster than inflation; and delay until January 1, 2032 the implementation of the HHS rebate rule that would have limited the fees that pharmacy benefit managers can charge. Further, under the IRA, orphan drugs are exempted from the Medicare drug price negotiation program, but only if they have one rare disease designation and for which the only approved indication is for that disease or condition. If a product receives multiple rare disease designations or has multiple approved indications, it may not qualify for the orphan drug exemption. The effects of the IRA on Talaris’ business and the healthcare industry in general is not yet known.

In February 2023, HHS also issued a proposal in response to an October 2022 executive order from President Biden that includes a proposed prescription drug pricing model that will test whether targeted Medicare payment adjustments will sufficiently incentivize manufacturers to complete confirmatory trials for drugs approved through FDA’s accelerated approval pathway. Although a number of these and other proposed measures may require authorization through additional legislation to become effective, and the Biden administration may reverse or otherwise change these measures, both the Biden administration and Congress have indicated that they will continue to seek new legislative measures to control drug costs.

49


Talaris cannot predict the initiatives that may be adopted infederal Sunshine Act, as amended, and its implementing regulations, requires manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies for which payment is available under Medicare, Medicaid or the future. The continuing efforts ofChildren’s Health Insurance Program (with certain exceptions) to report annually to the government, insurance companies, managed care organizations and other payors of healthcare servicesHHS information related to contain or reduce costs of healthcare and/or impose price controls may adversely affect:

the demand for Talaris’ product candidates, if Talaris obtains regulatory approval;

Talaris’ ability to set a price that Talaris believes is fair for Talaris’ products, if licensed;

Talaris’ ability to generate revenue and achieve or maintain profitability;

the level of taxes that Talaris is required to pay; and

the availability of capital.

Any reduction in reimbursement from Medicare“payments or other government programs may result in a similar reduction in payments from private payors, which may adversely affect Talaris’ future profitability. Talaris expects that additional U.S. federal healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the future, anytransfers of which could limit the amounts that the U.S. Federal Government will pay for healthcare drugsvalue” made to physicians (defined to include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists and services, which could result in reduced demand for Talaris’ drug candidates or additional pricing pressures.

Individual states in the United States have also become increasingly active in passing legislation and implementing regulations designed to control pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain drug access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and designed to encourage importation fromchiropractors), other countries and bulk purchasing. Legally mandated price controls on payment amounts by third-party payors or other restrictions could harm Talaris’ business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. In addition, regional healthcare authorities and individual hospitals are increasingly using bidding procedures to determine what pharmaceutical products and which suppliers will be included in their prescription drug and other healthcare programs. This could reduce the ultimate demand for Talaris’ drugs or put pressure on Talaris’ drug pricing, which could negatively affect Talaris’ business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Risks Related to Privacy and Data Security Laws

Talaris is subject to stringent and changing privacy and data security laws, contractual obligations, self-regulatory schemes, government regulation, and standards related to data privacy and security. The actual or perceived failure by Talaris, Talaris’ collaborators, vendors or other relevant third parties to comply with such obligations could harm Talaris’ reputation, subject Talaris to significant fines and liability, or otherwise adversely affect Talaris’ business, operations and financial performance.

Talaris collects, receives, stores, processes, uses, generates, transfers, discloses, makes accessible, protects and shares personal information and other information, including information Talaris collects about patients and healthcare providers in connection with clinical trials.

There are numerous federal, state, local and international laws, regulations and guidance regarding privacy, information security and processing, the number and scope of which is changing, subject to differing applications and interpretations, and which may be inconsistent among jurisdictions, or in conflict with other rules, laws or data protection obligations. Data protection laws and data protection worldwide is, and is likely to remain, uncertain for the foreseeable future, and Talaris’ failure or perceived failure to address or comply with these laws could: increase Talaris’ compliance and operational costs; expose Talaris to regulatory scrutiny, actions, fines and penalties; result in reputational harm; lead to a loss of customers; reduce the use of Talaris’ products; result in litigation and liability; and otherwise result in other material harm to Talaris’ business.

For example, in the United States, HIPAA, as amended by HITECH, imposes privacy, security and breach reporting obligations with respect to individually identifiable health information upon “covered entities” (health plans, health care clearinghousesprofessionals (such as physician assistants and certain health care providers),nurse practitioners) and their respective business associates, individuals or entities that create, receive, maintain or transmit protected health information in connection with providing a service for or on behalf of a covered entity,teaching hospitals, as well as information regarding ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their covered subcontractors. HIPAA mandates the reporting of certain breachesimmediate family members; and

66


analogous state and foreign laws and regulations, such as state anti-kickback and false claims laws, which may apply to sales or marketing arrangements and claims involving healthcare items or services reimbursed by non-governmental third-party payors, including private insurers; state and foreign laws that require pharmaceutical companies to comply with the pharmaceutical industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines and the relevant compliance guidance promulgated by the federal government or otherwise restrict payments that may be made to healthcare providers; state and local laws requiring the registration of pharmaceutical sales representatives; state and foreign laws that require drug manufacturers to report information related to payments and other transfers of value to physicians and other healthcare providers, marketing expenditures or pricing; federal consumer protection and unfair competition laws, which broadly regulate marketplace activities and activities that potentially harm consumers; and state and foreign laws that govern the privacy and security and other processing of health information in certain circumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and often are not preempted by HIPAA, thus complicating compliance efforts.

Efforts to HHS, affected individualsensure that our business arrangements with third parties comply with applicable healthcare laws and if the breachregulations will involve substantial costs. It is large enough, the media. Entitiespossible that governmental authorities will conclude that our business practices may not comply with current or future statutes, regulations or case law interpreting applicable fraud and abuse or other healthcare laws and regulations. If our operations are found to be in violation of HIPAA as the resultany of a breach of unsecured protected health information, a complaint about privacy practicesthese laws or an audit by HHS,any other governmental regulations that may apply to us, we may be subject to significant civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, fines, additional regulatory oversight, litigation, imprisonment, exclusion from government funded healthcare programs, such as Medicare and penalties and/Medicaid, and the curtailment or additional reporting and oversight obligations if required to enter into a resolution agreement and corrective action plan with HHS to settle allegationsrestructuring of HIPAA non-compliance. Even when HIPAA does not apply, according to the FTC, failing to take appropriate steps to keep consumers’ personal information secure constitutes unfair acts or practices in or affecting commerce in violation of Section 5(a)our operations. If any of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(a). The FTC expects a company’s data security measuresphysicians or other healthcare providers or entities with whom we expect to do business is found not to be reasonable and appropriate in light of the sensitivity and volume of consumer information it holds, the size and complexity of its business, and the cost of available tools to improve security and reduce vulnerabilities. Individually identifiable health information is considered sensitive data that merits stronger safeguards. The FTC’s guidance for appropriately securing consumers’ personal information is similar to what is required by the HIPAA security regulations.

50


Additionally, U.S. States have begun introducing privacy legislation. For example, California recently enacted the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), which creates new individual privacy rights for California consumers (as defined in the law) and places increased privacy and security obligations on entities handling personal data of consumers or households. The CCPA, which went into effect on January 1, 2020, requires covered companies to provide certain disclosures to consumers about its data collection, use and sharing practices, and to provide affected California residents with ways to opt-out of certain sales or transfers of personal information. The CCPA also provides for civil penalties for violations, as well as a private right of action for data breaches that may increase Talaris’ risk to data breach class action litigation. The CCPA will be expanded substantially on January 1, 2023, when the California Privacy Rights Act of 2020 (“CPRA”) becomes fully operative. The CPRA will, among other things, give California residents the ability to limit use of certain sensitive personal information, establish restrictions on the retention of personal information, expand the types of data breaches subject to the CCPA’s private right of action, and establish a new California Privacy Protection Agency to implement and enforce the new law. The CCPA and the CPRA could substantially impact Talaris’ business.

Additionally, some observers have noted that the CCPA and CPRA could mark the beginning of a trend toward more stringent privacy legislation in the U.S., which could increase Talaris’ potential liability and adversely affect Talaris’ business. Already, in the United States, Talaris has witnessed significant developments at the state level. For example, in 2021, Virginia and Colorado enacted state legislation that becomes effective January 1, 2023. In 2022, Utah and Connecticut also enacted privacy legislation. With bills proposed in many other jurisdictions, it remains quite possible that other states will follow suit. Such proposed legislation, if enacted, may add additional complexity, variation in requirements, restrictions and potential legal risk, require additional investment of resources in compliance programs, impact strategies and the availability of previously useful data and could result in increased compliance costs and/with applicable laws, that person or changes in business practices and policies. The existence of comprehensive privacy laws in different states in the country will make Talaris’ compliance obligations more complex and costly and may increase the likelihood that Talarisentity may be subject to enforcement actionscriminal, civil or otherwise incur liability for noncompliance.administrative sanctions, including exclusions from government funded healthcare programs.

The increasing number and complexity of regional, country and U.S. state data protection laws, and other changes in laws or regulations across the globe, especially those associated with the enhanced protection of certain types of sensitive data could lead to government enforcement actions and significant penalties against Talaris and could have a material adverse effect on Talaris’ business, financial condition or results of operations.

Talaris may also be subject to additional privacy restrictions in various foreign jurisdictions around the world in which Talaris may operate or process personal information. The collection, use, storage, disclosure, transfer, or other processing of personal information regarding individuals in the European Economic Area (“EEA”), including personal health data, is subject to the General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679 (“GDPR”). The GDPR is wide-ranging and imposes numerous requirements on companies that process personal data, including requirements relating to processing health and other sensitive data, obtaining consent of the individuals to whom the personal data relates, providing information to individuals regarding data processing activities, implementing safeguards to protect the security and confidentiality of personal data, providing notification of data breaches, and taking certain measures when engaging third-party processors. The GDPR also imposes strict rules on the transfer of personal data to countries outside the EU, including the United States, and permits data protection authorities to impose large penalties for violations of the GDPR, including potential fines of up to €20 million or 4% of annual global revenues, whichever is greater. The GDPR also confers a private right of action on data subjects and consumer associations to lodge complaints with supervisory authorities, seek judicial remedies, and obtain compensation for damages resulting from violations of the GDPR. Compliance with the GDPR is a rigorous and time-intensive process that may increase Talaris’ cost of doing business or require Talaris to change its business practices, and despite those efforts, there is a risk that Talaris may be subject to fines and penalties, litigation, and reputational harm in connection with any European activities.

In addition, further to the UK’s exit from the EU on January 31, 2020, the GDPR ceased to apply in the UK at the end of the transition period on December 31, 2020. However, as of January 1, 2021, the UK’s European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 incorporated the GDPR (as it existed on December 31, 2020 but subject to certain UK specific amendments) into UK law, referred to as the UK GDPR. The UK GDPR and the UK Data Protection Act 2018 set out the UK’s data protection regime, which is independent from but aligned to the EU’s data protection regime. Non-compliance with the UK GDPR may result in monetary penalties of up to £17.5 million or 4% of worldwide revenue, whichever is higher. Complying with these laws, if enacted, would require significant resources and leave Talaris vulnerable to possible fines and penalties if Talaris is unable to comply.

In addition, GDPR prohibits the transfer of personal data from the EU toOutside the U.S., interactions between pharmaceutical companies and other countries in respect of which the European Commission or other relevant regulatory body has not issued a so-called “adequacy decision” (known as “third countries”), unless the parties to the transfer have implemented specific safeguards to protect the transferred personal data. One of the primary safeguards used for transfers of personal data to the U.S. was the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield framework administeredhealth care professionals are also governed by the U.S. Department of Commerce. However, certain recent EU court decisions cast doubt on the ability to utilize one of the primary alternatives to the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield, namely the European Commission’s Standard Contractual Clauses, to lawfully transfer personal data to the U.S. and other third countries. In addition, the European Commission has recently published new versions of the Standard Contractual Clauses, which must be used for all new transfers of personal data from the EEA to third countries (including the United States) as of September 2021, and all existing transfers of personal data from the EU to third countries relying on the existing versions of the Standard Contractual Clauses must be replaced by December 2022. The implementation of the new Standard Contractual Clauses may necessitate significant contractual overhaul of Talaris’ data transfer arrangements with third parties. Use of

51


both the existing and the new Standard Contractual Clauses must now be assessed on a case-by-case basis taking into account the legal regime applicable in the destination country, in particular applicable surveillance

strict laws, and rights of individuals, and additional supplementary technical, organizational and/or contractual measures and/or contractual provisions may need to be put in place.

At present, there are few if any viable alternatives to the Standard Contractual Clauses, and there remains some uncertainty with respect to the nature and efficacy of such supplementary measures in ensuring an adequate level of protection of personal data. As supervisory authorities issue further guidance on personal data export mechanisms (including circumstances where the Standard Contractual Clauses can and cannot be used) and/or start taking enforcement action, Talaris could suffer additional costs, complaints and/or regulatory investigations or fines. In addition, if Talaris is unable to transfer personal data between and among countries and regions in which Talaris operates and/or engages providers and/or otherwise transfers personal data, this could affect the manner in which Talaris receives and/or provides Talaris’ services, the geographical location or segregation of Talaris’ relevant systems and operations, and could adversely affect Talaris’ financial results and generally increase compliance risk as a result. Additionally, other countries outside of Europe have enacted or are considering enacting similar cross-border data transfer restrictions and laws requiring local data residency, which could increase the cost and complexity of operating Talaris’ business.

Furthermore, following Brexit, the relationship between the U.K. and the EEA in relation to certain aspects of data protection law remains somewhat uncertain. In June 2021, the European Commission issued an adequacy decision under the GDPR which allows transfers (other than those carried out for the purposes of U.K. immigration control) of personal data from the EEA to the U.K. to continue without restriction for a period of four years. After that period, the adequacy decision may be renewed only if the U.K. continues to ensure an adequate level of data protection. During these four years, the European Commission will continue to monitor the legal situation in the U.K. and could intervene at any point if the U.K. deviates from the level of data protection in place at the time of issuance of the adequacy decision. If the adequacy decision is withdrawn or not renewed, transfers of personal data from the EEA to the U.K. will require a valid “transfer mechanism” and Talaris may be required to implement new processes and put new agreements in place, such as Standard Contractual Clauses, to enable transfersnational anti-bribery laws of personal data from the EEA to the U.K. to continue, which could disrupt Talaris’ operations.

In addition, while the U.K. data protection regime currently permits data transfers from the U.K. to the EEAEU member states, national sunshine rules, regulations, industry self-regulation codes of conduct and other third countries covered by a European Commission adequacy decision, and currently includes a framework to permit the continued usephysicians’ codes of the existing version of the Standard Contractual Clauses for personal data transfers from the U.K. to third countries, this is subject to change in the future, and any such changes could have implications for Talaris’ transfers of personal data from the U.K. to the EEA and other third countries. In particular, the U.K. Information Commissioner’s Office has stated that it is working on its own bespoke version of the Standard Contractual Clauses and it is not clear whether the new Standard Contractual Clauses published by the European Commission will be accepted as a valid mechanism to permit the transfer of personal data from the U.K. to third countries and/or whether any U.K. version of the Standard Contractual Clauses will supersede the existing and/or new EU version of the Standard Contractual Clauses. This could necessitate the implementation of both U.K. and EU versions of Standard Contractual Clauses, which would require significant resources and result in significant cost to implement and manage.

Talaris is also subject to the terms of external and internal privacy and security policies, representations, certifications, standards, publications and frameworks, and contractual obligations to third parties related to privacy, information security and processing.

With applicable data protection laws, privacy policies and data protection obligations imposing complex and burdensome obligations, and with substantial uncertainty over the interpretation and application of these requirements, Talaris has faced and may face additional challenges in addressing and complying with them, and making necessary changes to Talaris’ privacy policies and practices, and may incur material costs and expenses in an effort to do so, any of which could materially adversely affect Talaris’ business operations and financial results, and may reduce the overall demand for Talaris’ products.

Talaris strives to comply with applicable data protection laws, privacy policies and data protection obligations to the extent possible, but Talaris may at times fail to do so, or may be perceived to have failed to do so. Moreover, despite Talaris’ efforts, Talaris may not be successful in achieving compliance if Talaris’ personnel, collaborators or vendors do not comply with applicable data protection laws, privacy policies and data protection obligations. Any failure or perceived failure by Talaris or Talaris’ collaborators, service providers and contractors to comply with federal or foreign laws or regulation, Talaris’ internal policies and procedures, representations or Talaris’ contracts governing the processing of personal data could result in negative publicity, disruptions or interruptions in Talaris’ operations, fines, penalties, lawsuits, liability, inability to process personal data, diversion of time and effort, proceedings against Talaris by governmental entities, or other adverse effects to Talaris’ business.

Risks Related to Dependence on Third Parties

Talaris has historically been, and may in the future be, dependent on a limited number of suppliers and, in some cases sole suppliers, for some of Talaris’ components and materials used in Talaris’ product candidates.

52


The manufacturing process for FCR001, like that of a number of other cell therapy companies, was characterized by limited numbers of suppliers, and in some cases sole source suppliers, with the manufacturing capabilities and know-how to create or source the reagents, materials and equipment necessary for the production of Talaris’ product candidates. For example, like many other cell therapy companies, Talaris’ manufacturing process for FCR001 depended on certain cell manipulation equipment and related reagents, all of which were available from Miltenyi Biotec (“Miltenyi”) as the sole supplier.

Talaris cannot be sure that its suppliers will remain in business, or that they will not be purchased by one of Talaris’ competitors or another company that decides not to continue producing these materials for Talaris. Additionally, during a public health emergency, there is a potential for certain manufacturing facilities and materials to be commandeered under the Defense Production Act of 1950, or equivalent foreign legislation, which may make it more difficult to obtain materials or reagents for Talaris’ product candidates for Talaris’ clinical trials or for commercial production, if approved, which could lead to delays in these trials or issues with Talaris’ commercial supply. Talaris’ use of a sole or a limited number of suppliers of raw materials, components and finished goods exposes Talaris to several risks, including disruptions in supply, price increases, late deliveries and an inability to meet customer demand. While Talaris tries to mitigate these risks by purchasing excess supplies, some of these components, such as reagents, typically expire after approximately four to six months. This short expiration period means that stocking the reagents in large quantities for future needs would not be an effective strategy to mitigate against the risk of shortage due to disruption of the supply chain or termination of Talaris’ business relationship. Talaris has pursued multiple sources for the critical components of Talaris’ manufacturing process, but there are, in general, relatively few alternative sources of supply for certain components and Talaris may not be successful in securing additional sources at all or on a timely basis. These vendors may be unable or unwilling to meet Talaris’ future demands for Talaris’ clinical trials or commercial sale. If Talaris is able to find a replacement supplier, the replacement supplier would need to be qualified and may require additional regulatory authority approval, which could result in further delay. For example, the FDA or EMA could require additional supplemental data, manufacturing data and comparability data up to and including clinical trial data if Talaris relies upon a new supplier. Any disruption in supply from any supplier or manufacturing location, could lead to supply delays or interruptions which would damage Talaris’ business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. If Talaris is required to switch to a replacement supplier, the manufacture and delivery of product candidates could be interrupted for an extended period, adversely affecting Talaris’ business. Establishing additional or replacement suppliers may not be accomplished quickly. While Talaris seeks to maintain adequate inventory of the components and materials that it expects to use, any interruption or delay in the supply of components or materials, or Talaris’ inability to obtain components or materials from alternate sources at acceptable prices in a timely manner, could impair Talaris’ ability to conduct Talaris’ clinical trials and, if Talaris’ product candidates are approved, to meet the demand of Talaris’ customers and cause them to cancel orders.

In addition, as part of the FDA’s approval of Talaris’ product candidates, the FDA must review and approve the individual components of Talaris’ production process, which includes raw materials, the manufacturing processes and facilities of Talaris’ suppliers and CDMOs. Some of Talaris’ prior suppliers may not have undergone this process, and may not have had any components included in any product approved by the FDA.

Talaris’ historical reliance on external suppliers subjected and may in the future subject Talaris to a number of risks that could harm Talaris’ reputation, business, and financial condition, including, among other things:

the interruption of supply resulting from modifications to or discontinuation of a supplier’s operations;

delays in product shipments resulting from uncorrected defects, reliability issues, or a supplier’s variation in a component;

a lack of long-term commercial supply arrangements for key components with Talaris’ suppliers;

the inability to obtain adequate supply in a timely manner, or to obtain adequate supply on commercially reasonable terms;

difficulty and cost associated with locating and qualifying alternative suppliers for Talaris’ components in a timely manner;

production delays related to the evaluation and testing of products from alternative suppliers, and corresponding regulatory qualifications;

a delay in delivery due to Talaris’ suppliers prioritizing other customer orders over Talaris’; and

fluctuation in delivery by Talaris’ suppliers due to changes in demand from Talaris or their other customers.

If any of these risks materialize, costs could significantly increase and Talaris’ ability to conduct Talaris’ clinical trials and, if Talaris’ product candidates are approved, to meet demand for Talaris’ products could be impacted. Some of these events could be the basis for FDA or other regulatory authority action, including injunction, recall, seizure, or total or partial suspension of production of Talaris’ product candidates.

Talaris has historically relied, and may in the future rely, on third parties to conduct Talaris’ clinical trials and perform some of Talaris’ research and preclinical studies. If these third parties do not satisfactorily carry out their contractual duties or fail to meet expected deadlines, Talaris’ development programs may be delayed or subject to increased costs, each of which may have an adverse effect on Talaris’ business and prospects.

53


Talaris does not have the ability to conduct all aspects of clinical trials itself. As a result, Talaris has historically been, and may in the future be, dependent on third parties to conduct future clinical trials of Talaris’ product candidates, including but not limited to governmental agencies and university laboratories, CDMOs, CROs, distribution and supply (logistics) services organizations, contract testing organizations (“CTOs”), consultants or consultant organization with specialized knowledge-based expertise. The timing of the initiation and completion of these trials will therefore be partially controlled by such third parties and may result in delays to Talaris’ development programs. Specifically, Talaris expects CROs, clinical investigators, and consultants to play a significant role in the conduct of these trials and the subsequent collection and analysis of data. However, Talaris will not be able to control all aspects of their activities. Nevertheless, Talaris is responsible for ensuring that each of Talaris’ trials is conducted in accordance with the applicable protocol and legal, regulatory and scientific standards, and Talaris’ reliance on the CROs, CTOs, and other third parties does not relieve Talaris of its regulatory responsibilities. For example, Talaris relied on a single third-party investigator to provide ongoing data from Talaris’ Phase 2 clinical trial. Talaris, Talaris’ CROs and clinical sites are required to comply with GCP requirements, which are regulations and guidelines enforced by the FDA, the Competent Authorities of the Member States of the EEA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities for all of Talaris’ current product candidates and any future product candidates in clinical development. Regulatory authorities enforce these GCP requirements through periodic inspections of trial sponsors, clinical trial investigators and clinical trial sites. If any of Talaris’ third-party investigators or other third parties fail to adhere to Talaris’ clinical trial protocols or to comply with applicable GCP requirements, the data generated in such clinical trials may be deemed unreliable, and the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may require Talaris to perform additional clinical trials before approving Talaris’ marketing applications. In addition, Talaris’ clinical trials must be conducted with product produced under cGMP regulations. Talaris’ failure to comply with these regulations may require Talaris to stop and/or repeat clinical trials, which would delay the marketing approval process. Moreover, principal investigators for Talaris’ clinical trials may serve as scientific advisors or consultants to Talaris from time to time and receive compensation in connection with such services. Under certain circumstances, Talaris may be required to report some of these relationships to the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities. The FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authority may conclude that a financial relationship between Talaris and a principal investigator has created a conflict of interest or otherwise affected interpretation of the trial. The FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authority may therefore question the integrity of the data generated at the applicable clinical trial site and the utility of the clinical trial itself may be jeopardized. This could result in a delay in approval, or rejection, of Talaris’ marketing applications by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authority, as the case may be, and may ultimately lead to the denial of marketing approval of Talaris’ product candidates.

There is no guarantee that any such CROs, clinical trial investigators or other third parties on which Talaris relies will devote adequate time and resources to Talaris’ development activities or perform as contractually required. Further, the performance of Talaris’ CROs has been, and may again in the future be interrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic, including due to travel or quarantine policies, heightened exposure of CRO staff who are healthcare providers to COVID-19 or prioritization of resources toward the pandemic. If any of these third parties fail to meet expected deadlines, adhere to Talaris’ clinical protocols or meet regulatory requirements, otherwise performs in a substandard manner, or terminates its engagement with Talaris, the timelines for Talaris’ development programs may be extended or delayed or Talaris’ development activities may be suspended or terminated.

If any of Talaris’ clinical trial sites terminates for any reason, Talaris may experience the loss of follow-up information on subjects enrolled in such clinical trials unless Talaris is able to transfer those subjects to another qualified clinical trial site, which may be difficult or impossible. If these relationships and any related compensation result in perceived or actual conflicts of interest, or the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities concludes that the financial relationship may have affected the interpretation of the trial, the integrity of the data generated at the applicable clinical trial site may be questioned and the utility of the clinical trial itself may be jeopardized, which could result in the delay or rejection of any marketing application Talaris submits by the FDA or any comparable foreign regulatory authority. Any such delay or rejection could prevent Talaris from commercializing Talaris’ current product candidates and any future product candidates.

Risks Related to Manufacturing

Risks Related to Talaris’ Manufacturing Facility

Talaris may fail to successfully operate its manufacturing facility, which could adversely affect its clinical trials and the commercial viability of its product candidates.

In connection with the development of FCR001, Talaris operated its own dedicated cGMP cell processing facility, located on the campus of the University of Louisville, where Talaris manufactured FCR001 for its clinical trials. Although Talaris operated its own manufacturing facility, Talaris’ operations remained subject to review and oversight by the FDA, and the FDA could object to Talaris’ use of its manufacturing facility or the processes used therein.

Talaris had begun to scale-up its manufacturing and processing approaches to appropriately address its anticipated commercial needs for FCR001 for LDKT. While those scale-up efforts have been deferred, in order to scale-up Talaris’ manufacturing capabilities to support Talaris’ potential commercial needs, Talaris will require substantial additional funds and will need to hire and retain significant additional personnel and comply with extensive cGMP regulations applicable to a commercial facility. If Talaris fails to

54


complete any construction in an efficient manner, recruit the required personnel and generally manage its growth effectively, the development and production of Talaris’ product candidates could be curtailed or delayed. Talaris’ manufacturing facility would also need to be licensed for the production of product candidates by the FDA. Even if its manufacturing facility is approved by the FDA, Talaris would be subject to ongoing periodic unannounced inspection by the FDA, corresponding state agencies and potentially third-party collaborators to ensure strict compliance with cGMPs and other government regulations.

Talaris may encounter difficulties if it determines to scale its manufacturing processes. Significant scale-up of manufacturing may result in unanticipated technical challenges and may require additional FDA approvals. Talaris may encounter difficulties in scaling out production, including problems involving raw material suppliers, production yields, technical difficulties, scaled-up product characteristics, quality control and assurance, shortage of qualified personnel, capacity constraints, compliance with FDA and foreign regulations, environmental compliance, production costs and development of advanced manufacturing techniques and process controls. The actual cost to manufacture and process Talaris’ product candidates could also be greater than Talaris expects and could materially and adversely affect the commercial viability of Talaris’ product candidates. Any of these difficulties, if they occur and are not overcome to the satisfaction of the FDA or other regulatory agency, could lead to significant delays and possibly the termination of the development program for such product candidate. These risks become more acute if Talaris scales up for commercial quantities, where a reliable source of product becomes critical to commercial success. The commercial viability of any of product candidates, if approved, will depend on Talaris’ ability to produce Talaris’ product candidates at a large scale. Failure to achieve this level of supply could jeopardize the successful commercialization of Talaris’ product candidates.

The manufacture of a cell therapy is complex and requires significant expertise, including the development of advanced manufacturing techniques and process controls. Manufacturers of cell therapy products often encounter difficulties in production, particularly in scaling out and validating initial production and ensuring the absence of contamination. These problems include difficulties with production costs and yields, quality control, including stability of the product, quality assurance testing, operator error, shortages of qualified personnel, shortages of raw materials, as well as compliance with strictly enforced federal, state and foreign regulations. For example, in late 2021, Talaris was required to undertake an additional apheresis of a donor when quality testing revealed that the product prepared from that donor’s stem cells was contaminated. While there can be no assurance at what point the donor blood product was contaminated, whether at the point of apheresis or during the manufacturing process, Talaris nonetheless has reviewed and enhanced its quality control procedures and believes the risk of future contamination to be low. Furthermore, if contaminants are discovered in Talaris’ cell therapy or in the manufacturing facilities, such manufacturing facilities may need to be closed for an extended period of time to investigate and remedy the contamination. Talaris cannot ensure that any stability or other issues relating to the manufacture of Talaris’ product candidates will not occur in the future.

Talaris may fail to manage the logistics of collecting and shipping raw material to the manufacturing site and shipping the product candidate to the patient. Logistical and shipment delays and problems caused by Talaris, Talaris’ vendors or other factors not in Talaris’ control, such as weather, could cause breakage or contamination of Talaris’ products and prevent or delay the delivery of product candidates to patients. Additionally, Talaris has to maintain a complex chain of identity and chain of custody with respect to donor material as it moves to the manufacturing facility, through the manufacturing process, and to the recipient. Failure to maintain chain of identity and chain of custody could result in patient death, loss of product or regulatory action.

Talaris’ manufacturing capabilities could be affected by cost-overruns, resource constraints, unexpected delays, equipment failures, labor shortages or disputes, natural disasters, power failures and numerous other factors that could prevent Talaris from realizing the intended benefits of Talaris’ manufacturing strategy, jeopardize Talaris’ ability to provide Talaris’ product candidates to patients, and have a material adverse effect on Talaris’ business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Talaris’ manufacturing process needs to comply with regulations relating to the quality and reliability of such processes. Should Talaris resume the development of biopharmaceutical product candidates, any failure to comply with relevant regulations could result in delays in or termination of Talaris’ clinical programs and suspension or withdrawal of any regulatory approvals. Further, if Talaris’ preclinical and clinical programs and the manufacture of Talaris’ product candidates are dependent on human donor material, Talaris could be subject to additional regulations and requirements.

The FDA, EMA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities require that any products that Talaris may eventually commercialize be manufactured according to cGMP, cGTP and similar jurisdictional standards. These requirements include, among other things, quality control, quality assurance and the maintenance of records and documentation. The FDA and comparable foreign regulatory agencies may also implement new standards at any time, or change their interpretations and enforcement of existing standards, including for the manufacture, packaging or testing of biological products.

Talaris may encounter difficulties in achieving quality control and quality assurance or meeting regulatory expectations. Talaris’ facilities are subject to inspections by the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities to confirm compliance with applicable regulatory requirements. Any failure to follow cGMP, cGTP or other regulatory requirements or delay, interruption or other issues that arise in the manufacture, packaging, or storage of Talaris’ product candidates as a result of Talaris’ failure to comply with regulatory requirements or pass any regulatory authority inspection could significantly impair Talaris’ ability to develop and commercialize Talaris’ product candidates, including leading to significant delays in the availability of Talaris’ product candidates for Talaris’ clinical trials or the termination of or suspension of a clinical trial, or the delay or prevention of a filing or approval of marketing

55


applications for Talaris’ product candidates. Significant non-compliance could also result in the imposition of sanctions, including warning or untitled letters, fines, injunctions, civil penalties, failure of regulatory authorities to grant marketing approvals, delays, suspension or withdrawal of approvals, license revocation, seizures or recalls of products, operating restrictions and criminal prosecutions, any of which could damage Talaris’ reputation and Talaris’ business.

In addition, Talaris’ clinical programs and the manufacture of FCR001 have been dependent on human donor material. Procurement of certain human organs for transplantation is subject to the National Organ Transplant Act of 1984 (“NOTA”), which prohibits the acquisition, receipt, or transfer of any human organ for valuable consideration for Talaris in human transplantation. Talaris depends on third parties who arrange for LDKT to comply with applicable NOTA requirements and Talaris does not know whether any failure by such third parties to comply with NOTA requirements could impact the integrity or usability of data in Talaris’ clinical trials.

If Talaris fails to comply with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, Talaris could become subject to fines or penalties or incur costs that could have a material adverse effect on the success of Talaris’ business.

Talaris is subject to numerous environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, including those governing laboratory procedures and the handling, use, storage, treatment and disposal of hazardous materials and wastes. Talaris’ operations involve the use of hazardous and flammable materials, including chemicals and biological materials. Talaris’ operations also produce hazardous waste products. Talaris generally contracts with third parties for the disposal of these materials and wastes. Talaris cannot eliminate the risk of contamination or injury from these materials. In the event of contamination or injury resulting from Talaris’ use of hazardous materials, Talaris could be held liable for any resulting damages, and any liability could exceed Talaris’ resources. Talaris also could incur significant costs associated with civil or criminal fines and penalties.

Although Talaris maintains workers’ compensation insurance to cover Talaris for costs and expenses, Talaris may incur due to injuries to Talaris’ employees resulting from the use of hazardous materials with a policy limit that Talaris believes is customary for similarly situated companies and adequate to provide Talaris with insurance coverage for foreseeable risks, this insurance may not provide adequate coverage against potential liabilities. Talaris does not maintain insurance for environmental liability or toxic tort claims that may be asserted against Talaris in connection with Talaris’ storage or disposal of biological or hazardous materials.

In addition, Talaris may incur substantial costs in order to comply with current or future environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. These current or future laws and regulations may impair Talaris’ research, development or production efforts.professional conduct. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations also may result in substantial fines, penalties or other sanctions, which could adversely affect Talaris’ business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Risks Related to the Manufacturing of Talaris’ Product Candidates

Should Talaris resume the development of cell therapy product candidates, Talaris may encounter difficulties in production, particularly with respect to scaling Talaris’ manufacturing capabilities.

Optimizing manufacturing processes is a difficult and uncertain task and there are risks associated with scaling to the level required for advanced clinical trials or commercialization, including, among others, cost overruns, potential problems with process scale-up, process reproducibility, stability issues, lot consistency and timely availability of reagents or raw materials. If Talaris is unable to adequately validate or scale-up Talaris’ manufacturing processes, Talaris may encounter lengthy delays in commercializing any product candidates that Talaris may be developing. Talaris may continue to manufacture product itself or it may ultimately decide to outsource its manufacturing to a third party CDMO. Talaris may not be successful in transferring its production system to such manufacturer, or the manufacturer(s) on whom Talaris relies may not have the necessary capabilities to complete the implementation and development process. If Talaris is able to adequately validate and scale-up the manufacturing processes for any product candidates with a contract manufacturer, Talaris will still need to negotiate an agreement for commercial supply with that contract manufacturer and it is not certain Talaris will be able to come to agreement on terms acceptable to Talaris. As a result, Talaris may ultimately be unable to reduce the cost of goods for any product candidates to levels that will allow for an attractive return on investment if and when those product candidates are approved and commercialized.

The manufacturing process for any products that Talaris may develop is subject to the FDA and foreign regulatory authority approval processes and, if Talaris chooses to outsource Talaris’ commercial production, Talaris will need to contract with manufacturers who Talaris believes can meet applicable FDA and foreign regulatory authority requirements on an ongoing basis. If Talaris is unable to reliably produce any product candidate to specifications acceptable to the FDA or other regulatory authorities, Talaris may not obtain or maintain the approvals Talaris needs to commercialize Talaris’ products. Even if Talaris obtains regulatory approval for any of Talaris’ product candidates, there is no assurance that either Talaris or any CDMOs Talaris may contract with in the future will be able to manufacture the approved product to specifications and under cGMPs acceptable to the FDA or other regulatory authorities, to produce it in sufficient quantities to meet the requirements for the potential launch of the product, or to meet potential future demand. Any of these challenges could delay completion of clinical trials, require bridging clinical trials or the repetition of one or more clinical trials, increase clinical trial costs, delay approval of Talaris’ product candidates, impair

56


commercialization efforts, increase Talaris’ cost of goods and have an adverse effect on Talaris’ business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.

Should Talaris resume the development of any cell therapy product candidates, Talaris’ future success will depend on Talaris’ ability to manufacture Talaris’ products on a timely basis with acceptable manufacturing costs, while at the same time maintaining good quality control and complying with applicable regulatory requirements. Talaris’ inability to do so could have a material adverse effect on Talaris’ business, financial condition, prospects and results of operations. In addition, Talaris could incur higher manufacturing costs if manufacturing processes or standards change and Talaris could need to replace, modify, design or build and install equipment, all of which would require additional capital expenditures.

There is a risk of manufacturing issues associated with the differences in donor starting materials, interruptions in the manufacturing process, contamination, equipment or reagent failure, improper installation or operation of equipment, vendor or operator error, and variability in product characteristics. Even minor deviations from Talaris’ normal manufacturing processes could result in reduced production yields, lot failures, product defects, product delays, product recalls, product liability claims and other supply disruptions. If for any reason Talaris loses a donor’s starting material or one of Talaris’ custom-manufactured products at any point in the process, the manufacturing process for that recipient will need to be restarted and the resulting delay may adversely affect that recipient’s outcome. If Talaris’ product candidates are manufactured for each particular patient, like FCR001 was, Talaris will be required to maintain a chain of identity with respect to materials as they move from the donor to the manufacturing facility, through the manufacturing process and on to the patient. Further, as Talaris’ product candidate is developed through preclinical to later-stage clinical trials towards approval and commercialization, it is common that various aspects of the development program, such as manufacturing methods, are altered in an effort to optimize processes and results. If Talaris makes these types of changes, Talaris may not achieve Talaris’ intended objectives and any of these changes could cause Talaris’ product candidates to perform differently than Talaris expects, potentially affecting the results of clinical trials.

In addition, the FDA, the EMA and other foreign regulatory authorities may require Talaris to submit samples of any personalized product lot, together with the protocols showing the results of applicable tests at any time. Under some circumstances, the FDA, the EMA or other foreign regulatory authorities may require that Talaris not distribute a specific product lot until the relevant agency authorizes its release. Slight deviations in the manufacturing process, including those affecting quality attributes and stability, may result in unacceptable changes in the product that could result in lot failures or product recalls. Lot failures or product recalls could cause Talaris to delay product launches or clinical trials, which could be costly to Talaris and otherwise harm Talaris’ business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. Problems in Talaris’ manufacturing process could restrict Talaris’ ability to meet market demand for Talaris’ products.

Any problems in Talaris’ manufacturing process or facilities could make Talaris a less attractive collaborator for potential partners, including larger pharmaceutical companies and academic research institutions, which could limit Talaris’ access to additional attractive development programs.

Should Talaris resume the development of cell therapy product candidates, they may require specific shipping, storage, handling and administration at the clinical sites, including cold-chain logistics, which could subject Talaris’ product candidates toreputational risk, of loss or damage.

Cell therapy product candidates may be sensitive to temperature, storage and handling conditions. They must be stored at very low temperatures in specialized freezers or specialized shipping containers. For example, for administration of FCR001, the cryopreserved product container was required to be carefully removed from storage, and rapidly thawed under controlled temperature conditions in an area proximal to the patient’s bedside and administered into the patient. The handling, thawing and administration of the cryopreserved therapy product was required to be performed according to specific instructions, typically using specific disposables, specific bags and in some steps within specific time periods. Failure to correctly handle cell therapy product candidates and/or failure to administer such product candidates within the specified period post-thaw could negatively impact the efficacy and or safety of those product candidates, or cause a loss of such product candidates.

For example, FCR001 was required to be cryopreserved/frozen using specialized equipment and following specific procedures in order to be stored without damage in a cost-efficient manner and without degradation. In the future, Talaris could encounter difficulties in further optimization of freezing and thawing methodologies, and also in obtaining the necessary regulatory approvals for using such methodologies in treatment. If Talaris cannot adequately demonstrate similarity of Talaris’ frozen product to the unfrozen or thawed form to the satisfaction of the FDA, Talaris could face substantial delays in Talaris’ regulatory approvals. If Talaris is unable to freeze any cell-based therapies Talaris may develop for storage and shipping purposes, Talaris’ ability to promote adoption and standardization of Talaris’ products, as well as achieve economies of scale by centralizing production facilities, will be limited.

Even if Talaris is able to successfully freeze and thaw any cell-based therapies without damage in a cost-efficient manner and without degradation to the satisfaction of the FDA to support regulatory approval, Talaris will still need to scale-up a cost-effective and reliable cold-chain distribution and logistics network, which Talaris may be unable to accomplish. Failure to effectively scale-up Talaris’ cold-chain supply logistics, by Talaris or third parties, could in the future lead to additional manufacturing costs and delays in

57


Talaris’ ability to supply required quantities for commercial supply. For these and other reasons, Talaris may not be able to manufacture any other cell-based therapies Talaris may develop at commercial scale or in a cost-effective manner.

The process of manufacturing cell therapies is inherently susceptible to contamination. If microbial, viral or other contaminations are discovered in any product candidate or in Talaris’ manufacturing facility, Talaris’ manufacturing facility may need to be closed for an extended period of time to allow Talaris to investigate and remedy the contamination. Because Talaris’ cell therapy product candidates are manufactured from the cells of third-party donors, the process of manufacturing is susceptible to the availability of the third-party donor material. The process of developing products that can be commercialized may be particularly challenging, even if they otherwise prove to be safe and effective. The manufacture of these product candidates involves complex processes. Some of these processes require specialized equipment and highly skilled and trained personnel. The process of manufacturing these product candidates will be susceptible to additional risks, given the need to maintain aseptic conditions throughout the manufacturing process. Contamination with viruses or other pathogens in either the donor material or materials utilized in the manufacturing process or ingress of microbiological material at any point in the process may result in contaminated or unusable product. These types of contaminations could result in manufacturing delays which could result in delays in the development of Talaris’ product candidates. These contaminations could also increase the risk of adverse side effects.

Risks Related to Talaris’ Intellectual Property

As Talaris does not have in-house research capabilities, Talaris will depend on intellectual property licensed from third parties for development of biopharmaceutical product candidates and termination of any of such licenses could result in the loss of significant rights, which would harm Talaris’ business.

In connection with the potential development of product candidates, Talaris may need to enter license intellectual property from third parties. License agreements to intellectual property may require Talaris to use diligent efforts or meet development thresholds, to maintain the license, including establishing a set timeline for developing and commercializing products. If Talaris fails to comply with any of the obligations under such license agreements, including payment terms and diligence terms, licensors may have the right to terminate its agreements, in which case Talaris may lose important intellectual property rights and it may not be able to develop, manufacture, market or sell the products covered by its agreements or it may face otherpublic reprimands, administrative penalties, under such agreements. In addition, such a termination could result in the licensor reacquiring the intellectual property rights and subsequently enabling a competitor to access the technology. Any such occurrence could materially adversely affect the value of the product candidate being developed under any such agreement. Termination of license agreements or reduction or elimination of its rights under them may result in its having to negotiate a new or reinstated agreement, which may not be available to Talaris on equally favorable terms, or at all, which may mean Talaris is unable to develop or commercialize the affected product candidate or cause Talaris to lose its rights under the agreement.

Further, the agreements under which Talaris may license intellectual property or technology from third parties may be are complex, and certain provisions in such agreements may be susceptible to multiple interpretations. Accordingly, material disputes may arise between Talaris and its licensor, or its licensor and its licensors, regarding intellectual property subject to a license agreement, including those relating to:

the scope of rights, if any, granted under the license agreement and other interpretation-related issues;

whether and the extent to which Talaris’ technology and processes infringe on intellectual property of the licensor that is not subject to the license agreement;

whether Talaris’ licensor or its licensor had the right to grant the license agreement;

whether third parties are entitled to compensation or equitable relief, such as an injunction, for its use of the intellectual property without their authorization;

Talaris’ right to sublicense patent and other rights to third parties under collaborative development relationships;

whether Talaris is complying with its obligations with respect to the use of the licensed technology in relation to its development and commercialization of product candidates;

its involvement in the prosecution of the licensed patents and Talaris’ licensors’ overall patent enforcement strategy;

the allocation of ownership of inventions and know-how resulting from the joint creation or use of intellectual property by Talaris’ licensors and by Talaris and its partners; and

the amounts of royalties, milestones or other payments due under the license agreement.

The resolution of any contract interpretation disagreement that may arise could narrow what Talaris believes to be the scope of its rights to the relevant intellectual property or technology, increase what Talaris believes to be its financial or other obligations under the relevant agreement, or decrease the financial or other benefits Talaris might otherwise receive under the relevant agreement. If material disputes over intellectual property that Talaris has licensed prevent or impair its ability to maintain licensing arrangements on

58


acceptable terms, or are insufficient to provide Talaris the necessary rights to use the intellectual property, Talaris may be unable to successfully develop and commercialize the affected product candidates. If Talaris or any such licensors fail to adequately protect this intellectual property, its ability to commercialize any product candidates could suffer. Any material disputes with licensors or any termination of the licenses on which Talaris depends could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Talaris may rely on third parties from whom Talaris licenses proprietary technology to file and prosecute patent applications and maintain patents and otherwise protect the intellectual property Talaris licenses from them. Talaris may have limited control over these activities or any other intellectual property that may be related to Talaris’ in-licensed intellectual property. For example, Talaris cannot be certain that such activities by these licensors will be conducted in compliance with applicable laws and regulations or will result in valid and enforceable patents and other intellectual property rights. Talaris may have limited control over the manner in which Talaris’ licensors initiate an infringement proceeding against a third-party infringer of the intellectual property rights, or defend certain of the intellectual property that may be licensed to Talaris. It is possible that the licensors’ infringement proceeding or defense activities may be less vigorous than if Talaris conducts them itself.

Talaris is generally also subject to all of the same risks with respect to protection of intellectual property that Talaris licenses, as Talaris is for intellectual property that Talaris owns, which are described below. If Talaris or Talaris’ licensors fail to adequately protect such licensed intellectual property, Talaris’ ability to commercialize products could suffer.

If Talaris is unable to obtain and maintain sufficient intellectual property protection for Talaris’ product candidates and manufacturing process, or if the scope of the intellectual property protection is not sufficiently broad, Talaris’ ability to commercialize Talaris’ product candidates successfully and to compete effectively may be adversely affected.

Talaris has relied upon a combination of patents, trademarks, trade secrets and confidentiality agreements that it owns or possesses or that are owned or possessed by Talaris’ collaborators that were in-licensed to Talaris under licenses, including the amended and restated exclusive license agreement (“ULRF License Agreement”) with University of Louisville Research Foundation, Inc. (“ULRF”) (which terminated in connection with Talaris' entry into a transaction with ImmunoFree, Inc. ("ImmunoFree"), conditioned upon the license of Talaris’ rights under the ULRF License Agreement to ImmunoFree), to protect the intellectual property related to Talaris’ technology and product candidates. When Talaris refers to “Talaris’” technologies, inventions, patents, patent applications or other intellectual property rights, Talaris is referring to both the rights that it owns or possesses as well as those that it in-licenses, many of which have been critical to Talaris’ intellectual property protection and Talaris’ historical business. For example, Talaris’ historical product candidates and Facilitating Allo-HSCT Therapy are protected by patents or patent applications of ULRF that Talaris had licensed and as confidential know-how and trade secrets. Additionally, Talaris’ earlier stage product candidates are not yet protected by any patents or patent applications. If the intellectual property that Talaris relies on is not adequately protected, competitors may be able to access Talaris’ technologies and erode or negate any competitive advantage Talaris may have.

The patentability of inventions and the validity, enforceability and scope of patents in the biotechnology field is highly uncertain because it involves complex legal, scientific and factual considerations, and it has in recent years been the subject of significant litigation. Moreover, the standards applied by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) and non-U.S. patent offices in granting patents are not always applied uniformly or predictably. For example, there is no uniform worldwide policy regarding patentable subject matter or the scope of claims allowable in biotechnology patents.

There is no assurance that all potentially relevant prior art relating to Talaris’ patents and patent applications is known to Talaris or has been found in the instances where searching was done. Further, publications of discoveries in the scientific literature often lag behind the actual discoveries, and patent applications in the United States and other jurisdictions are typically not published until 18 months after filing or, in some cases, not at all. Thus, Talaris may be unaware of prior art that could be used to invalidate an issued patent or prevent a pending patent application from issuing as a patent. There also may be prior art of which Talaris is aware, but which Talaris does not believe affects the validity or enforceability of a claim of one of Talaris’ patents or patent applications, which may, nonetheless, ultimately be found to affect the validity or enforceability of such claim. As a consequence of these and other factors, Talaris’ patent applications may fail to result in issued patents with claims that cover Talaris’ product candidates in the United States or in other countries.

Even if patents have issued or do successfully issue from patent applications, and even if these patents cover Talaris’ product candidates, third parties may challenge the validity, ownership, enforceability or scope thereof, which may result in these patents being narrowed, invalidated, circumvented, or held to be unenforceable. No assurance can be given that if challenged, Talaris’ patents would be declared by a court to be valid or enforceable.

Even if unchallenged, Talaris’ patents and patent applications or other intellectual property rights may not adequately protect Talaris’ intellectual property, provide exclusivity for Talaris’ product candidates, or prevent others from designing around Talaris’ claims. The possibility exists that others will develop products on an independent basis which have the same or similar effects as Talaris’ product candidates and which do not infringe Talaris’ patents or other intellectual property rights, or that others will design around the claims of patents that Talaris has had issued that cover Talaris’ product candidates. If the breadth or strength of protection

59


provided by Talaris’ patents and patent applications with respect to Talaris’ product candidates is threatened, it could jeopardize Talaris’ ability to commercialize Talaris’ product candidates and dissuade companies from collaborating with Talaris.

Talaris may also desire to seek a license from a third party who owns intellectual property that may be necessary or useful for providing exclusivity for Talaris’ product candidates, or for providing the ability to develop and commercialize a product candidate in an unrestricted manner. There is no guarantee that Talaris will be able to obtain a license from such a third party on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.

Obtaining and enforcing biopharmaceutical patents is costly, time consuming and complex, and Talaris may not be able to file and prosecute all necessary or desirable patent applications, or maintain, enforce and license any patents that may issue from such patent applications, at a reasonable cost or in a timely manner. It is also possible that Talaris will fail to identify patentable aspects of Talaris’ research and development output before it is too late to obtain patent protection. Talaris may not have the right to control the preparation, filing and prosecution of patent applications, or to maintain patents licensed from third parties. Talaris may have limited control over the manner in which Talaris’ licensors initiate an infringement proceeding against a third-party infringer of the intellectual property rights, or defend certain of the intellectual property that may be licensed to Talaris. It is possible that the licensors’ infringement proceeding or defense activities may be less vigorous than if Talaris conducts them itself. Therefore, these patents and applications may not be prosecuted and enforced in a manner consistent with the best interests of Talaris’ business.

Talaris and Talaris’ collaborators have filed a number of patent applications covering FCR001 or methods of using or making FCR001. Talaris cannot offer any assurances about which, if any, patents will be issued with respect to these pending patent applications, the breadth of any such patents that are ultimately issued or whether any issued patents will be found invalid and unenforceable or will be threatened by third parties. Because patent applications in the United States and most other countries are confidential for a period of time after filing, and some remain so until issued, Talaris cannot be certain that Talaris or Talaris’ collaborators were the first to file any patent application related to a product candidate. Talaris or Talaris’ collaborators may also become involved in proceedings regarding Talaris’ patents, including patent infringement lawsuits, interference or derivation proceedings, oppositions, reexaminations, and inter partes and post-grant review proceedings before the USPTO, the European Patent Office and other non-U.S. patent offices.

Even if granted, patents have a limited lifespan. In the United States, if all maintenance fees are timely paid, the natural expiration of a patent generally occurs 20 years after the earliest U.S. non-provisional application is filed. Although various extensions may be available if certain conditions are met, the life of a patent and the protection it affords is limited. If Talaris encounters delays in Talaris’ clinical trials or in obtaining regulatory approvals, the period of time during which Talaris could exclusively market any of Talaris’ product candidates under patent protection, if approved, could be reduced. Given the amount of time required for the development, testing and regulatory review of new product candidates, patents protecting such candidates might expire before or shortly after such candidates are commercialized. Even if patents covering Talaris’ product candidates are obtained, once the patent life has expired for a product, Talaris may be vulnerable to competition from biosimilar products, as Talaris may be unable to prevent competitors from entering the market with a product that is similar or identical to Talaris’ product candidates.

In the United States, a patent that covers an FDA-approved drug or biologic may be eligible for a term extension designed to restore the period of the patent term that is lost during the premarket regulatory review process conducted by the FDA. Depending upon the timing, duration and conditions of FDA marketing approval of Talaris’ product candidates, one or more of Talaris’ U.S. patents may be eligible for limited patent term extension under the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 (“Hatch-Waxman Act”), which permits a patent term extension of up to five years for a patent covering an approved product as compensation for effective patent term lost during product development and the FDA regulatory review process. A patent term extension cannot extend the remaining term of a patent beyond a total of 14 years from the date of product approval, and only claims covering such approved drug product, a method for using it or a method for manufacturing it may be extended. In the EU, Talaris’ product candidates may be eligible for term extensions based on similar legislation. In either jurisdiction, however, Talaris may not receive an extension if Talaris fails to apply within applicable deadlines, fail to apply prior to expiration of relevant patents or otherwise fails to satisfy applicable requirements. Even if Talaris is granted such extension, the duration of such extension may be less than Talaris’ request. If Talaris is unable to obtain a patent term extension, or if the term of any such extension is less than Talaris’ request, the period during which Talaris can enforce Talaris’ patent rights for that product will be in effect shortened and Talaris’ competitors may obtain approval to market competing products sooner. The resulting reduction of years of revenue from applicable products could be substantial.

In addition, the United States federal government retains certain rights in inventions produced with its financial assistance under the Bayh-Dole Act. The federal government retains a “nonexclusive, nontransferable, irrevocable, paid-up license” for its own benefit. The Bayh-Dole Act also provides federal agencies with “march-in rights.” March-in rights allow the government, in specified circumstances, to require the contractor or successors in title to the patent to grant a “nonexclusive, partially exclusive, or exclusive license” to a “responsible applicant or applicants.” If the patent owner refuses to do so, the government may grant the license itself. Some of Talaris’ licensed patents are subject to the provisions of the Bayh-Dole Act.

Should Talaris pursue development of clinical product candidates, Talaris may not be able to protect its intellectual property rights throughout the world.

60


Filing, prosecuting, enforcing and defending patents on all of Talaris’ potential product candidates in all countries throughout the world would be prohibitively expensive. Talaris’ intellectual property rights in certain countries outside the United States may be less extensive than those in the United States. In addition, the laws of certain foreign countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as laws in the United States. Consequently, Talaris and Talaris’ future collaborators may not be able to prevent third parties from practicing Talaris’ inventions in countries outside the United States, or from selling or importing infringing products made using Talaris’ inventions in and into the United States or other jurisdictions. Competitors may use Talaris’ technologies in jurisdictions where Talaris has not obtained patent protection or where Talaris does not have exclusive rights under the relevant patents to develop their own products and, further, may export otherwise-infringing products to territories where Talaris and Talaris’ collaborators have patent protection but where enforcement is not as strong as that in the United States. These infringing products may compete with Talaris’ product candidates in jurisdictions where Talaris or Talaris’ future collaborators have no issued patents or where Talaris does not have exclusive rights under the relevant patents, or Talaris’ patent claims and other intellectual property rights may not be effective or sufficient to prevent them from so competing.

Many companies have encountered significant problems in protecting and defending intellectual property rights in foreign jurisdictions. The legal systems of certain countries, particularly certain developing countries, do not favor the enforcement of patents and other intellectual property protection, particularly those relating to biopharmaceuticals, which could make it difficult for Talaris and Talaris’ collaborators to stop the infringement of Talaris’ patents or marketing of competing products in violation of Talaris’ intellectual property rights generally. Proceedings to enforce Talaris’ patent rights in foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial costs and divert Talaris’ attention from other aspects of Talaris’ business, could put Talaris’ patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly, could put Talaris’ patent applications at risk of not issuing, and could provoke third parties to assert claims against Talaris or Talaris’ future collaborators. Talaris or Talaris’ future collaborators may not prevail in any lawsuits that Talaris or Talaris’ collaborators initiate, and even if Talaris or Talaris’ collaborators are successful, the damages or other remedies awarded, if any, may not be commercially meaningful.

In some jurisdictions, including EU countries, compulsory licensing laws compel patent owners to grant licenses to third parties. In addition, some countries limit the enforceability of patents against government agencies or government contractors. In these countries, the patent owner may have limited remedies, which could materially diminish the value of such patent. If Talaris or any of Talaris’ future collaborators are forced to grant a license to third parties under patents relevant to Talaris’ business, or if Talaris or Talaris’ future collaborators are prevented from enforcing patent rights against third parties, Talaris’ competitive position may be substantially impaired in such jurisdictions.

Should Talaris resume the development of biopharmaceutical product candidates, obtaining and maintaining Talaris’ patent protection depends on compliance with various procedural, document submission, fee payment and other requirements imposed by governmental patent agencies, and Talaris’ patent protection could be reduced or eliminated for non-compliance with these requirements.

Periodic maintenance fees, renewal fees, annuity fees and various other governmental fees on patents and/or applications will be due to be paid to the USPTO and various governmental patent agencies outside of the United States in several stages over the lifetime of the patents and/or applications. Talaris has systems in place to remind itself to pay these fees, and Talaris employs an outside firm and relies on its outside counsel to pay these fees due to non-U.S. patent agencies. The USPTO and various non-U.S. governmental patent agencies require compliance with a number of procedural, documentary, fee payment and other similar provisions during the patent application process. Talaris employs reputable law firms and other professionals to help it comply, and in many cases, an inadvertent lapse can be cured by payment of a late fee or by other means in accordance with the applicable rules. However, there are situations in which non-compliance can result in abandonment or lapse of the patent or patent application, resulting in partial or complete loss of patent rights in the relevant jurisdiction. In such an event, Talaris’ competitors might be able to enter the market and this circumstance would have a material adverse effect on Talaris’ business.

If Talaris is unable to protect the confidentiality of Talaris’ trade secrets and other proprietary information, the value of Talaris’ technology could be materially adversely affected and Talaris’ business could be harmed.

In addition to seeking the protection afforded by patents, Talaris relies on trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements to protect proprietary know-how that is not patentable or that Talaris elects not to patent, processes for which patents are difficult to enforce, and other elements of Talaris’ technology, discovery and development processes that involve proprietary know-how, information or technology that is not covered by patents. Any disclosure to or misappropriation by third parties of Talaris’ confidential proprietary information could enable competitors to quickly duplicate or surpass Talaris’ technological achievements, including by enabling them to develop and commercialize products substantially similar to or competitive with Talaris’ product candidates, thus eroding Talaris’ competitive position in the market.

Trade secrets can be difficult to protect. Talaris seeks to protect Talaris’ proprietary technology and processes, in part, by entering into confidentiality agreements and invention assignment agreements with Talaris’ employees, consultants, and outside scientific advisors, contractors and collaborators. These agreements are designed to protect Talaris’ proprietary information. Although Talaris uses reasonable efforts to protect Talaris’ trade secrets, Talaris’ employees, consultants, contractors, collaborators, or outside

61


scientific advisors might intentionally or inadvertently disclose Talaris’ trade secrets or confidential, proprietary information to Talaris’ competitors. In addition, Talaris’ competitors may otherwise gain access to Talaris’ trade secrets or independently develop substantially equivalent information and techniques. If any of Talaris’ confidential proprietary information were to be lawfully obtained or independently developed by a competitor, Talaris would have no right to prevent such competitor from using that technology or information to compete with Talaris, which could harm Talaris’ competitive position.

Enforcing a claim that a third party illegally obtained and is using any of Talaris’ trade secrets is expensive and time consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. In addition, the laws of certain foreign countries do not protect proprietary rights such as trade secrets to the same extent or in the same manner as the laws of the United States. Misappropriation or unauthorized disclosure of Talaris’ trade secrets to third parties could impair Talaris’ competitive advantage in the market and could materially adversely affect Talaris’ business, results of operations and financial condition.

If Talaris’ trademarks and trade names are not adequately protected, then Talaris may not be able to build name recognition in Talaris’ markets of interest and Talaris’ business may be adversely affected.

If Talaris’ trademarks and trade names are not adequately protected, then Talaris may not be able to build name recognition in Talaris’ markets of interest and Talaris’ business may be adversely affected. Talaris may not be able to protect Talaris’ rights to these trademarks and trade names, which Talaris needs to build name recognition among potential collaborators or customers in Talaris’ markets of interest. At times, competitors may adopt trade names or trademarks similar to Talaris’, thereby impeding Talaris’ ability to build brand identity and possibly leading to market confusion. In addition, there could be potential trade name or trademark infringement claims brought by owners of other registered trademarks or trademarks that incorporate variations of Talaris’ unregistered trademarks or trade names. Over the long term, if Talaris is unable to successfully register Talaris’ trademarks and trade names and establish name recognition based on Talaris’ trademarks and trade names, then Talaris may not be able to compete effectively and Talaris’ business may be adversely affected. Talaris’ efforts to enforce or protect Talaris’ proprietary rights related to trademarks, trade secrets, domain names, copyrights or other intellectual property may be ineffective and could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and could adversely impact Talaris’ financial condition or results of operations.

Risks Related to Potential Third Party Claims

If Talaris is sued for infringing the intellectual property rights of third parties, the resulting litigation could be costly and time-consuming and could prevent or delay Talaris’ development and commercialization efforts.

Talaris’ commercial success depends, in part, on it and its future collaborators not infringing the patents and proprietary rights of third parties. However, Talaris’ research, development and commercialization activities may be subject to claims that Talaris infringes or otherwise violates patents or other intellectual property rights owned or controlled by third parties. There is a substantial amount of litigation and other adversarial proceedings, both within and outside the United States, involving patents and other intellectual property rights in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries, including patent infringement lawsuits, interference or derivation proceedings, oppositions, reexaminations, and inter partes and post-grant review proceedings before the USPTO and non-U.S. patent offices. Numerous U.S. and non-U.S. issued patents and pending patent applications owned by third parties exist in the fields in which Talaris is developing and may develop Talaris’ product candidates. As the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries expand and more patents are issued, the risk increases that Talaris’ product candidates may be subject to claims of infringement of third parties’ patent rights, as it may not always be clear to industry participants, including Talaris, which patents cover various types of products or methods of use. The coverage of patents is subject to interpretation by the courts, and the interpretation is not always uniform or predictable. For example, Talaris is aware of certain issued patents that may cover some of Talaris’ product candidates, and while Talaris believes these patent claims are not valid and would not establish a basis for Talaris’ operations to be enjoined, Talaris may be subject to litigation and be obligated to pay reasonable royalties to the patent owners. In addition, many companies in intellectual property-dependent industries, including the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries, have employed intellectual property litigation as a means to gain an advantage over their competitors. Some claimants may have substantially greater resources than Talaris does and may be able to sustain the costs of complex intellectual property litigation to a greater degree and for longer periods of time than Talaris could. In addition, patent holding companies that focus solely on extracting royalties and settlements by enforcing patent rights may target Talaris.

Third parties may assert infringement claims against Talaris based on existing or future intellectual property rights, alleging that Talaris is employing their proprietary technology without authorization. There may be third-party patents or patent applications with claims to materials, formulations, methods of manufacture or methods for treatment related to the use or manufacturing of Talaris’ product candidates that Talaris failed to identify. For example, patent applications covering Talaris’ product candidates could have been filed by others without Talaris’ knowledge, since these applications generally remain confidential for some period of time after their filing date. Even pending patent applications that have been published, including some of which Talaris is aware, could be later amended in a manner that could cover Talaris’ product candidates or their use or manufacture. After issuance, the scope of patent claims remains subject to construction as determined by an interpretation of the law, the written disclosure in a patent and the patent’s prosecution history. In addition, Talaris may have analyzed patents or patent applications of third parties that Talaris believes are relevant to Talaris’ activities and believe that Talaris is free to operate in relation to any of Talaris’ product candidates, but Talaris’

62


competitors may obtain issued claims, including in patents Talaris considers to be unrelated, which may block Talaris’ efforts or potentially result in any of Talaris’ product candidates or Talaris’ activities infringing their claims.

If Talaris or Talaris’ future collaborators are sued for patent infringement, Talaris would need to demonstrate that Talaris’ product candidates, products and methods either do not infringe the patent claims of the relevant patent or that the patent claims are invalid or unenforceable, and Talaris may not be able to do this. Proving that a patent is invalid or unenforceable is difficult and even if Talaris is successful in the relevant proceedings, Talaris may incur substantial costs and the time and attention of Talaris’ management and scientific personnel could be diverted from other activities. If any issued third-party patents were held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be valid and enforceable and cover aspects of Talaris’ materials, formulations, methods of manufacture or methods for treatment, Talaris could be forced, including by court order, to cease developing, manufacturing or commercializing the relevant product candidate until the relevant patent expires. Alternatively, Talaris may desire or be required to obtain a license from such third party in order to Talaris the infringing technology and to continue developing, manufacturing or marketing the infringing product candidate. However, Talaris may not be able to obtain any required license on commercially reasonably terms, or at all. Even if Talaris were able to obtain a license, the rights may be nonexclusive, which could result in Talaris’ competitors gaining access to the same intellectual property licensed to Talaris. Additionally, in the event of a successful intellectual property claim against Talaris, Talaris may have to pay substantial damages, including treble damages and attorneys’ fees if Talaris is found to have willfully infringed a patent, or to redesign Talaris’ infringing product candidates, which may be impossible or technically infeasible, or require substantial time and monetary expenditure. In addition to paying monetary damages, Talaris may lose valuable intellectual property rights or personnel and the parties making claims against Talaris may obtain injunctive or other equitable relief, which could impose limitations on the conduct of Talaris’ business.

Talaris may be subject to claims that Talaris’ employees, consultants or independent contractors have wrongfully used or disclosed confidential information of third parties or that Talaris’ employees have wrongfully used or disclosed alleged trade secrets of their former employers.

As is common in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industry, Talaris has employed individuals who are or were previously employed at universities or other biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies, including Talaris’ competitors or potential competitors. In particular, Talaris’ founder and former Senior Scientific Advisor, Suzanne T. Ildstad, MD, is the Jewish Hospital Distinguished Professor of Transplantation Research, Director of the Institute for Cellular Therapeutics, and a Professor in the Department of Surgery with associate appointments in the Departments of Physiology & Biophysics and Microbiology & Immunology at the University of Louisville School of Medicine. Talaris’ former Chief Technology Officer, Michael Zdanowski, and certain other employees or consultants were previously employed at Medeor Therapeutics, Inc., which is developing a cell therapy similar to Talaris’. Although Talaris tries to ensure that its employees, consultants and independent contractors do not use the proprietary information or know-how of others in their work for Talaris, Talaris may be subject to claims that it or its employees, consultants or independent contractors have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed intellectual property, including trade secrets or other proprietary information, of any of Talaris’ employee’s former employer or other third parties. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. If Talaris fails in defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, Talaris may lose valuable intellectual property rights or personnel, which could adversely impact Talaris’ business. Even if Talaris is successful in defending against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management and other employees.

Talaris may face claims that it misappropriated, or otherwise acted unjustly or in bad faith with respect to, the confidential information or trade secrets of third parties, including collaborators or former collaborators. If Talaris is found to have misappropriated a third party’s trade secrets, or otherwise to have acted unjustly or in bad faith with respect to such trade secrets, Talaris may be prevented from further using these trade secrets, which could limit Talaris’ ability to develop Talaris’ product candidates, or may be otherwise subject to monetary damages.

Talaris may face claims that it misappropriated, or otherwise acted unjustly or in bad faith with respect to, the confidential information or trade secrets of third parties, including collaborators or former collaborators. Defending against intellectual property claims could be costly and time consuming, regardless of the outcome. Thus, even if Talaris were to ultimately prevail, or to settle before a final judgment, any litigation could burden Talaris with substantial unanticipated costs. Parties making claims against Talaris may be able to sustain the costs of litigation more effectively than Talaris can because they have substantially greater resources. In addition, litigation or threatened litigation could result in significant demands on the time and attention of Talaris’ management team, distracting them from the pursuit of other company business. During the course of any intellectual property litigation, there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, rulings on motions, and other interim proceedings in the litigation and these announcements may have negative impact on the perceived value of Talaris’ product candidates, programs or intellectual property. Any uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of any litigation could have material adverse effect on Talaris’ ability to raise additional funds or otherwise have a material adverse effect on Talaris’ business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. As a result of all of the foregoing, any actual or threatened intellectual property claim, including claims that Talaris acted unjustly or in bad faith with respect to the intellectual property of others, could prevent Talaris from developing or commercializing a product candidate, subject Talaris to monetary damages, or force Talaris to cease some aspect of Talaris’ business operations.

63


Talaris cannot ensure that additional patent rights relating to inventions described and claimed in Talaris’ pending patent applications will issue or that patents based on Talaris’ patent applications will not be challenged and rendered invalid and/or unenforceable.

Talaris has issued and pending U.S. and foreign patent applications in Talaris’ portfolio, however, Talaris cannot predict:

if and when additional patents may issue based on Talaris’ patent applications;

the scope of protection of any patent issuing based on Talaris’ patent applications;

whether the claims of any patent issuing based on Talaris’ patent applications will provide protection against competitors;

whether or not third parties will find ways to invalidate or circumvent Talaris’ patent rights;

whether or not others will obtain patents claiming aspects similar to those covered by Talaris’ patents and patent applications;

whether Talaris will need to initiate litigation or administrative proceedings to enforce and/or defend Talaris’ patent rights which will be costly whether Talaris wins or loses; and

whether the patent applications that Talaris owns or in-licenses will result in issued patents with claims that cover Talaris’ product candidates or uses thereof in the United States or in other foreign countries.

Talaris cannot be certain that the claims in Talaris’ pending patent applications directed to Talaris’ product candidates and/or technologies will be considered patentable by the USPTO or by patent offices in foreign countries. One aspect of the determination of patentability of Talaris’ inventions depends on the scope and content of the “prior art,” information that was or is deemed available to a person of skill in the relevant art prior to the priority date of the claimed invention. There may be prior art of which Talaris is not aware that may affect the patentability of Talaris’ patent claims or, if issued, affect the validity or enforceability of a patent claim. The examination process may require Talaris to narrow Talaris’ claims, which may limit the scope of patent protection that Talaris may obtain. Even if the patents are issued based on Talaris’ patent applications, third parties may challenge the validity, enforceability or scope thereof, which may result in such patents being narrowed, invalidated or held unenforceable. Furthermore, even if they are unchallenged, patents in Talaris’ portfolio may not adequately exclude third parties from practicing relevant technology or prevent others from designing around Talaris’ claims. If the breadth or strength of Talaris’ intellectual property position with respect to Talaris’ product candidates is threatened, it could dissuade companies from collaborating with Talaris to develop and threaten Talaris’ ability to commercialize Talaris’ product candidates. In the event of litigation or administrative proceedings, Talaris cannot be certain that the claims in any of Talaris’ issued patents will be considered valid by courts in the United States or foreign countries.

Talaris may become involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce Talaris’ intellectual property, which could be expensive, time-consuming and unsuccessful and have a material adverse effect on the success of Talaris’ business.

Third parties may infringe Talaris’ patents or misappropriate or otherwise violate Talaris’ intellectual property rights. Talaris’ patent applications cannot be enforced against third parties practicing the technology claimed in these applications unless and until a patent issues from the applications, and then only to the extent the issued claims cover the technology. In the future, Talaris or Talaris’ collaborators may elect to initiate legal proceedings to enforce or defend Talaris’ or Talaris’ collaborators’ intellectual property rights, to protect Talaris’ or Talaris’ collaborators’ trade secrets or to determine the validity, ownership, enforceability or scope of Talaris’ intellectual property rights. Any claims that Talaris or Talaris’ collaborators assert against perceived infringers could also provoke these parties to assert counterclaims against Talaris or Talaris’ collaborators alleging that Talaris or Talaris’ collaborators infringe their intellectual property rights or that Talaris’ intellectual property rights are invalid or unenforceable.

Interference or derivation proceedings provoked by third parties, brought by Talaris or Talaris’ collaborators, or declared by the USPTO may be necessary to determine the priority of inventions or matters of inventorship with respect to Talaris’ patents or patent applications. Talaris or Talaris’ collaborators may also become involved in other proceedings, such as reexamination or opposition proceedings, inter partes review, post-grant review or other pre-issuance or post-grant proceedings before the USPTO or in non-U.S. jurisdictions relating to Talaris’ intellectual property or the intellectual property of others. An unfavorable outcome in any of these proceedings could result in Talaris losing Talaris’ valuable intellectual property rights, require Talaris or Talaris’ collaborators to cease using the related technology and commercializing Talaris’ product candidates, or require Talaris to license rights to it from the prevailing party. Talaris’ business could be harmed if the prevailing party does not offer Talaris or Talaris’ collaborators a license on commercially reasonable terms if any license is offered at all. Even if Talaris or Talaris’ licensors obtain a license, it may be non-exclusive, thereby giving Talaris’ competitors access to the same technologies licensed to Talaris or Talaris’ collaborators. In addition, if the breadth or strength of protection provided by Talaris’ patents and patent applications is threatened, it could dissuade companies from collaborating with Talaris to license, develop or commercialize current or future product candidates.

Any intellectual property proceedings can be expensive and time-consuming. Talaris’ or Talaris’ collaborators’ adversaries in these proceedings may have the ability to dedicate substantially greater resources to prosecuting these legal actions than Talaris or Talaris’ collaborators can. Accordingly, despite Talaris’ or Talaris’ collaborators’ efforts, Talaris or Talaris’ collaborators may not be able to prevent third parties from infringing upon or misappropriating Talaris’ intellectual property rights, particularly in countries

64


where the laws may not protect Talaris’ rights as fully as in the United States. Even if Talaris is successful in the relevant proceedings, Talaris may incur substantial costs and the time and attention of Talaris’ management and scientific personnel could be diverted from other activities. In addition, in an infringement proceeding, a court may decide that one or more of Talaris’ patents is invalid or unenforceable, in whole or in part, or may refuse to stop the other party from using the technology at issue on the grounds that Talaris’ patents do not cover the technology in question. An adverse result in any litigation proceeding could put one or more of Talaris’ patents at risk of being invalidated, held unenforceable or interpreted narrowly.

Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of Talaris’ confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during this type of litigation. In addition, there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments, and if securities analysts or investors view these announcements in a negative light, the price of Talaris common stock could be adversely affected.

Risks Related to Intellectual Property Laws and Regulations

Some of Talaris’ intellectual property has been discovered through government-funded programs and thus may be subject to federal regulations such as certain reporting requirements, a preference for U.S.-based companies, and the possibility of “march-in” rights. Compliance with such regulations or the inability to obtain a waiver for meeting such requirements may limit Talaris’ ability to contract with non-U.S. manufacturers, or, in the unlikely event of the government exercising their “march-in” rights, may limit Talaris’ exclusive rights.

Some of Talaris’ intellectual property rights were generated through the use of U.S. government funding and are therefore subject to certain federal regulations. As a result, the U.S. government may have certain rights to intellectual property embodied in certain of Talaris’ current or future product candidates pursuant to the Bayh-Dole Act. These U.S. government rights in certain inventions developed under a government-funded program include a non-exclusive, non-transferable, irrevocable worldwide license to Talaris inventions for any governmental purpose. In addition, the U.S. government has the right, under certain limited circumstances, to require Talaris to grant exclusive, partially exclusive, or non-exclusive licenses to any of these inventions to a third party if it determines that: (i) adequate steps have not been taken to commercialize the invention; (ii) government action is necessary to meet public health or safety needs; or (iii) government action is necessary to meet requirements for public use under federal regulations (also referred to as “march-in rights”). To Talaris’ knowledge, however, the U.S. government has, to date, not exercised any march-in rights on any patented technology that was generated using U.S. government funds. The U.S. government also has the right to take title to these inventions if Talaris or the applicable grantee fail to disclose the invention to the government and fail to file an application to register the intellectual property within specified time limits. Intellectual property generated under a government funded program is also subject to certain reporting requirements, compliance with which may require Talaris to expend substantial resources. In addition, the U.S. government requires that any products embodying the subject invention or produced through the use of the subject invention be manufactured substantially in the United States. The manufacturing preference requirement can be waived if the owner of the intellectual property can show that reasonable but unsuccessful efforts have been made to grant licenses on similar terms to potential licensees that would be likely to manufacture substantially in the United States or that under the circumstances domestic manufacture is not commercially feasible. This preference for U.S. manufacturers may limit Talaris’ ability to contract with non-U.S. product manufacturers for products covered by such intellectual property. To the extent any of Talaris’ current or future intellectual property is generated through the use of U.S. government funding, the provisions of the Bayh-Dole Act may similarly apply.

Changes in U.S. or foreign patent laws could diminish the value of patents in general, thereby impairing Talaris’ ability to protect Talaris’ products.

Changes in either the patent laws or interpretation of the patent laws in the United States or non-U.S. jurisdictions could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of patent applications and the enforcement or defense of issued patents. Assuming that other requirements for patentability are met, prior to March 2013, in the United States, the first to invent the claimed invention was entitled to the patent, while outside the United States, the first to file a patent application was entitled to the patent. After March 2013, under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (the “America Invents Act”), enacted in September 2011, the United States transitioned to a first inventor to file system in which, assuming that other requirements for patentability are met, the first inventor to file a patent application will be entitled to the patent on an invention regardless of whether a third party was the first to invent the claimed invention. A third party that files a patent application in the USPTO after March 2013, but before Talaris, could therefore be awarded a patent covering an invention of Talaris’ even if Talaris had made the invention before it was made by such third party. This will require Talaris to be cognizant of the time from invention to filing of a patent application and be diligent in filing patent applications, but circumstances could prevent Talaris from promptly filing patent applications on Talaris’ inventions. Since patent applications in the United States and most other countries are confidential for a period of time after filing or until issuance, Talaris cannot be certain that Talaris or Talaris’ licensors were the first to either (i) file any patent application related to Talaris’ product candidates or (ii) invent any of the inventions claimed in Talaris’ or Talaris’ licensor’s patents or patent applications.

The America Invents Act also included a number of significant changes that affect the way patent applications are prosecuted and also affects patent litigation. These include allowing third party submission of prior art to the USPTO during patent prosecution

65


and additional procedures to attack the validity of a patent by Talaris PTO administered post-grant proceedings, including post-grant review and, inter partes review, and derivation proceedings. Because of a lower evidentiary standard in USPTO proceedings compared to the evidentiary standard in United States federal courts necessary to invalidate a patent claim, a third party could potentially provide evidence in a USPTO proceeding sufficient for the USPTO to hold a claim invalid even though the same evidence would be insufficient to invalidate the claim if first presented in a district court action.

Accordingly, a third party may attempt to Talaris the USPTO procedures to invalidate Talaris’ patent claims that would not have been invalidated if first challenged by the third party as a defendant in a district court action. Therefore, the America Invents Act and its implementation could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of Talaris’ owned or in-licensed patent applications and the enforcement or defense of Talaris’ owned or in-licensed issued patents, all of which could have a material adverse effect on Talaris’ business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

In addition, the patent positions of companies in the development and commercialization of biologics and pharmaceuticals are particularly uncertain. U.S. Supreme Court rulings have narrowed the scope of patent protection available in certain circumstances and weakened the rights of patent owners in certain situations. This combination of events has created uncertainty with respect to the validity and enforceability of patents, once obtained. Depending on future actions by the U.S. Congress, the federal courts, and the USPTO, the laws and regulations governing patents could change in unpredictable ways that could have a material adverse effect on Talaris’ existing patent portfolio and Talaris’ ability to protect and enforce Talaris’ intellectual property in the future.

Risks Related to Talaris’ Financial Condition and Capital Needs

Talaris is a biotechnology company and Talaris has incurred net losses since its inception. Talaris anticipates that it will continue to incur significant net losses for the foreseeable future, and may never achieve or maintain profitability.

Talaris is a biotechnology company with a limited operating history. Investment in biopharmaceutical product development is highly speculative because it entails substantial upfront capital expenditures and significant risk that any potential product candidate will fail to demonstrate adequate effect or an acceptable safety profile, gain regulatory approval and become commercially viable. Talaris has no products approved for commercial sale and have not generated any revenue to date. As a result, Talaris is not profitable and has incurred net losses in each period since its inception. Since Talaris’ inception, Talaris has devoted substantially all of Talaris’ resources to developing Talaris’ product candidate, FCR001, building Talaris’ intellectual property portfolio, business planning, raising capital and providing general and administrative support for these operations. Talaris’ financial condition and operating results, including net losses, may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter and year to year. Accordingly, one should not rely upon the results of any quarterly or annual periods as indications of future operating performance. Additionally, net losses and negative cash flows have had, and will continue to have, an adverse effect on Talaris’ stockholders’ equity and working capital. Talaris’ net loss was $37.2 million and $36.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, respectively, and $73.9 million and $47.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Talaris had an accumulated deficit of $$202.0 million and $164.7 million as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. Talaris expects to continue to incur net losses for the foreseeable future, including costs associated with its review of strategic alternatives. These expenses could increase or change depending on the outcome of such review.

Talaris anticipates that its expenses will increase substantially if and as it pursues the development of any product candidates, including if it:

seeks to identify new product candidates and initiate research, preclinical and clinical development efforts for any future product candidates;

seeks regulatory approvals for any future product candidates that successfully complete clinical development;

scales its in-house manufacturing process to address anticipated commercial needs;

seeks to meet regulatory requirements for its in-house manufacturing process;

adds operational, financial and management information systems and personnel, including personnel to help it comply with its obligations as a public company;

hires and retains additional personnel, such as clinical, quality control, scientific, manufacturing, commercial and administrative personnel, to support its product candidate development;

maintains, expands and protects its intellectual property portfolio;

establishes sales, marketing, distribution, manufacturing, supply chain and other commercial infrastructure in the future to commercialize any product candidates for which Talaris may obtain regulatory approval;

adapts Talaris’ regulatory compliance efforts to incorporate requirements applicable to marketed products;

adds equipment and physical infrastructure to support Talaris’ research and development; and

66


acquires or in-licenses other product candidates and technologies.

Talaris’ expenses could increase beyond Talaris’ expectations if Talaris is required by the FDA or other regulatory authorities to perform clinical trials in addition to those that Talaris currently expects, if there are any delays in establishing appropriate manufacturing arrangements for Talaris’ product candidates, or if Talaris experiences delays in the initiation or completion of Talaris’ clinical trials or the development of any of Talaris’ product candidates for any reason.

Raising capital may cause dilution to Talaris’ existing stockholders, restrict Talaris’ operations or require Talaris to relinquish rights to its product candidates on terms that are unfavorable to Talaris.

Talaris may seek additional capital through a variety of means, including through private and public equity offerings and debt financings. To the extent that Talaris raises additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the ownership interest of existing stockholders will be diluted, and the terms may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect the rights of stockholders. Debt financing, if available, may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting Talaris’ ability to take certain actions, including incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures, entering into licensing arrangements or declaring dividends. If Talaris raises additional funds from third parties, Talaris may have to relinquish valuable rights to Talaris’ technologies or product candidates or grant licenses on terms that are not favorable to Talaris. Market volatility may further adversely impact Talaris’ ability to access capital as and when needed. If Talaris is unable to raise additional funds through equity or debt financing when needed, Talaris may be required to delay, limit, reduce or terminate Talaris’ product development or commercialization efforts for Talaris’ product candidates, grant to others the rights to develop and market product candidates that Talaris would otherwise prefer to develop and market itself or take other actions that are adverse to Talaris’ business.

Risks Related to Talaris’ Business, Growth and Industry

Risks Related to Employees

Talaris’ recent reductions in force may negatively impact employee morale and productivity.

In connection with the evaluation of strategic alternatives and in order to conserve its capital resources, in February 2023 and April 2023, Talaris undertook organizational restructurings that significantly reduced its workforce by approximately 33% and 95%, respectively. In order to retain remaining employees to evaluate and assist with the evaluation of strategic alternatives, Talaris offered assurance of severance arrangements and retention benefits to each of its remaining four employees. There can be no assurance that these programs will allow Talaris to retain the personnel necessary to implement its strategic assessment plans.

Talaris’ employees, principal investigators, consultants and collaborators may engage in misconduct or other improper activities, including noncompliance with regulatory standards and requirements, which could cause significant liability for Talaris and harm Talaris’ reputation.

Talaris is exposed to the risk of employee and third party fraud or other misconduct, including intentional failures to comply with FDA regulations or similar regulations of comparable foreign regulatory authorities, provide accurate information to the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, comply with manufacturing standards Talaris has established, comply with federal and state healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations and similar laws and regulations established and enforced by comparable foreign regulatory authorities, report financial information or data accurately or disclose unauthorized activities to Talaris. Misconduct could also involve the improper use of information obtained in the course of clinical trials, which could result in regulatory sanctions, litigation and serious harm to Talaris’ reputation. It is not always possible to identify and deter employee and third-party misconduct, and the precautions Talaris takes to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses or in protecting Talaris from governmental investigations or other actions or lawsuits stemming from a failure to be in compliance with such laws or regulations. If any such actions are instituted against Talaris, and Talaris is not successful in defending itself or asserting Talaris’ rights, those actions could have a significant impact on Talaris’ business and results of operations, including the imposition of significant fines or other sanctions, including the imposition of civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, monetary fines, imprisonment, possible exclusion from participation in Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs, additional reporting requirements and oversight if Talaris becomes subject to a corporate integrity agreement or similar agreement to resolve allegations of noncompliance with these laws, contractual damages, reputational harm, diminished profits and future earnings, and curtailment of Talaris’ operations, any of which could adversely affect Talaris’ ability to operate Talaris’ business, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Related to Business Disruptions

If Talaris’ security measures are compromised now, or in the future, or the security, confidentiality or integrity or availability of Talaris’ information technology, software, services, communications or data is compromised, limited, or fails, this could result in a materially adverse impact, including without limitation, damage to Talaris’ reputation, significant financial and legal exposure,

67


breach or triggering of data protection laws, privacy policies and data protection obligations, disruption to Talaris’ clinical trial or administrative activities, or loss of customers or collaborators.

Talaris relies on information technology systems that Talaris or Talaris’ third-party providers operate to process, transmit and store electronic information in Talaris’ day-to-day operations. In connection with Talaris’ business, Talaris may collect and use a variety of personal data, such as name, mailing address, email addresses, phone number and clinical trial information, as well as intellectual property, trade secrets, and proprietary business information owned or controlled by itself or other parties.

Despite the implementation of security measures, Talaris’ internal computer systems and those of any CROs and other contractors, consultants and relevant third parties are vulnerable to several threats, including without limitation damage from computer viruses, unauthorized access, terrorism, war, natural disasters, and telecommunication and electrical failures. Talaris exercises little or no control over these third parties, which increases Talaris’ vulnerability to problems with their systems. A successful cyberattack could result in the theft or destruction of intellectual property, data, or other misappropriation of assets, or otherwise compromise Talaris’ confidential or proprietary information and disrupt Talaris’ operations. Cyberattacks are increasing in their frequency, sophistication and intensity, and have become increasingly difficult to detect. Cyberattacks could include wrongful conduct by hostile foreign governments, industrial espionage, wire fraud and other forms of cyber fraud, the deployment of harmful malware, phishing attacks, denial-of-service, social engineering fraud or other means to threaten data security, confidentiality, integrity and availability. Although Talaris has not, to Talaris’ knowledge, experienced a material security incident, Talaris realizes that cyberattacks are a threat, and there can be no assurance that Talaris’ efforts will prevent information security breaches.

Talaris may be required to expend significant resources, fundamentally change Talaris’ business activities and practices, or modify Talaris’ services, software, operations or information technology in an effort to protect against security breaches and to mitigate, detect, and remediate actual and potential vulnerabilities. Applicable data protection laws, privacy policies and other data protection obligations may require Talaris to implement specific security measures or use industry-standard or reasonable measures to protect against security breaches.

If Talaris, Talaris’ service providers, collaborators, or other relevant third parties have experienced or in the future experience, any security incident(s) that result in any data loss, deletion or destruction, unauthorized access to, loss of, unauthorized acquisition or disclosure of, or inadvertent disclosure of sensitive information or compromise related to the security, confidentiality, integrity or availability of Talaris’ (or their) information technology, software, services, communications or data, it may result in a material adverse impact, including without limitation, legal liability, government investigations an inability to conduct Talaris’ clinical trials, regulatory investigations, enforcement actions, indemnity obligations, the disruption of Talaris’ operations, delays to the development and commercialization of Talaris’ product candidates, negative publicity and financial loss. A failure by Talaris or relevant third parties to detect, anticipate, measure or detect such security incidents could result in similar material adverse impacts.

Additionally, applicable data protection laws, privacy policies and data protection obligations may require Talaris to notify relevant stakeholders of security breaches, including affected individuals, customer and regulators. Such disclosures are costly, and the disclosures or the failure to comply with such requirements could lead to material adverse impacts, including without limitation, negative publicity, a loss of customer confidence in Talaris’ products or security measures or a breach of contract claim. There can be no assurances that the limitations of liability in Talaris’ contract would be enforceable or adequate or would otherwise protect Talaris from liabilities or damages.

Failures or significant downtime of Talaris’ information technology or telecommunication systems or those used by Talaris’ third-party service providers could cause significant interruptions in Talaris’ operations and adversely impact the confidentiality, integrity and availability of sensitive or confidential information. While Talaris has not experienced any such material system failure or security breach to date, if such an event were to occur and cause interruptions in Talaris’ operations, it could result in a material disruption of Talaris’ development programs and Talaris’ business operations. For example, the loss of data from completed or future preclinical studies and clinical trials could result in delays in Talaris’ regulatory approval efforts and significantly increase Talaris’ costs to recover or reproduce the data.

While Talaris maintains general liability insurance coverage and coverage for errors or omissions, Talaris cannot assure that such coverage will be adequate or otherwise protect Talaris from or adequately mitigate liabilities or damages with respect to claims, costs, expenses, litigation, fines, penalties, business loss, data loss, regulatory actions or other material adverse impacts arising out of Talaris’ privacy and security actions Talaris may experience, or that such coverage will continue to be available on acceptable terms or at all. The successful assertion of one or more large claims against Talaris that exceeds its available insurance coverage, or that results in changes to its insurance policies (including premium increases or the imposition of large deductible or co-insurance requirements), could have an adverse effect on Talaris’ business. In addition, Talaris cannot be sure that its existing insurance coverage and coverage for errors and omissions will continue to be available on acceptable terms or that Talaris’ insurers will not deny coverage as to any future claim.

Business disruptions could seriously harm Talaris’ financial condition and increase Talaris’ costs and expenses.

Talaris could be subject to earthquakes, power shortages, telecommunications failures, water shortages, floods, hurricanes, typhoons, fires, extreme weather conditions, medical epidemics and other natural or man-made disasters or business interruptions, for

68


which Talaris is predominantly self-insured. The occurrence of any of these business disruptions could seriously harm Talaris’ operations and financial condition and increase Talaris’ costs and expenses.

Market and economic conditions may have serious adverse consequences on Talaris’ business, financial condition and stock price.

Market conditions such as inflation, volatile energy costs, geopolitical issues, unstable global credit markets and financial conditions could lead to periods of significant economic instability, diminished liquidity and credit availability, diminished expectations for the global economy and expectations of slower global economic growth going forward. Talaris’ business and operations may be adversely affected by such instability, including any such inflationary fluctuations, economic downturns, volatile business environments and continued unstable or unpredictable economic and market conditions. There can be no assurance that further deterioration in credit and financial markets and confidence in economic conditions will not occur. Talaris’ general business strategy may be adversely affected by any such economic downturn, volatile business environment or continued unpredictable and unstable market conditions. If the current equity and credit markets deteriorate, or do not improve, it may make any necessary debt or equity financing more difficult, more costly, and more dilutive.

Failure to secure any necessary financing in a timely manner and on favorable terms could have a material adverse effect on Talaris’ growth strategy, financial performance and stock. In addition, there is a risk that one or more of Talaris’ current service providers, manufacturers and other collaborators may not survive these difficult economic times, which could directly affect Talaris’ ability to attain Talaris’ operating goals on schedule and on budget.

Furthermore, Talaris’ stock price may decline due in part to the volatility of the stock market and general economic downturn.

Global economic uncertainty and weakening product demand caused by political instability, changes in trade agreements and conflicts, such as the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, could adversely affect Talaris’ business and financial performance.

Economic uncertainty in various global markets caused by political instability and conflict has resulted, and may continue to result, in difficulty in forecasting Talaris’ financial results. Political developments impacting government spending and international trade, including current or potential government-imposed sanctions, potential government shutdowns and trade disputes and tariffs, may negatively impact markets and cause weaker macro-economic conditions. The continuing effect of any or all of these events could harm Talaris’ operations and weaken Talaris’ financial results.

Risks Related to Laws and Regulations that May Affect Talaris’ Businessimprisonment.

Legislation or other changes in U.S. tax law could adversely affect Talaris’our business and financial condition.

The rules dealing with U.S. federal, state, and local income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the Internal Revenue Service and the U.S. Treasury Department. Changes to tax laws (which changes may have retroactive application) could adversely affect Talaris or holders of Talaris common stock.us. In recent years, many changes have been made to applicable tax laws and changes are likely to continue to occur in the future.

It cannot be predicted whether, when, in what form, or with what effective dates, new tax laws may be enacted, or regulations and rulings may be enacted, promulgated or issued under existing or new tax laws, which could result in an increase in Talaris’ or Talaris’ shareholders’our tax liability or require changes in the manner in which Talaris operateswe operate in order to minimize or mitigate any adverse effects of changes in tax law or in the interpretation thereof.

69


Talaris’Our ability to use Talaris’our U.S. net operating loss carryforwards and certain other U.S. tax attributes may be limited.

As of December 31, 2022, Talariswe had U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $96.9$1.2 million. Under current law, unused U.S. federal net operating losses generated for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017 are not subject to expiration and may be carried forward indefinitely. Such U.S. federal net operating losses generally may not be carried back to prior taxable years, except that, net operating losses generated in 2018, 2019 and 2020 may be carried back to each of the five tax years preceding the tax years of such losses. Additionally, theThe amount of net operating loss carryforwards generated in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 that Talaris iswe are permitted to deduct in a taxable year beginning after December 31, 2020, is limited to 80% of taxable income in each such taxable year to which the net operating loss carryforwards are applied. In addition, Talaris’our U.S. federal net operating losses and tax credits may be subject to limitations under Sections 382 and 383 of the Code, if Talaris haswe have undergone or undergoesundergo an “ownership change,” generally defined as a greater than 50 percentage point change (by value) in its equity ownership by certain stockholders over a rolling three-year period. TalarisWe may have experienced such ownership changes in the past and may experience ownership changes in the future as a result of shifts in itsour stock ownership, some of which are outside its control, and will likely experience an ownership change as a result of the Merger. Talaris’our control. Our net operating losses and tax credits may also be impaired or restricted under state law. Talaris’Our ability to utilize itsour net operating loss carryforwards could be limited by an “ownership change” as described above, which could result in increased tax liability to Talaris.us.

67


Future changes in financial accounting standards or practices may cause adverse and unexpected revenue fluctuations and adversely affect our reported results of operations.

Future changes in financial accounting standards may cause adverse, unexpected revenue fluctuations and affect our reported financial position or results of operations. Financial accounting standards in the U.S. are constantly under review and new pronouncements and varying interpretations of pronouncements have occurred frequently in the past and are expected to occur again in the future. As a result, we may be required to make changes in our accounting policies. Those changes could affect our financial condition and results of operations or the way in which such financial condition and results of operations are reported. Compliance with new accounting standards may also result in additional expenses. As a result, we intend to invest all reasonably necessary resources to comply with evolving standards, and this investment may result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from business activities to compliance activities.

Risks Related to Our Business Operations, Employee Matters and Managing Growth

TalarisOur internal control over financial reporting may not meet the standards required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and failure to achieve and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, could have a material adverse effect on our business and share price.

Our management is required to establish and maintain an adequate internal control structure and procedures for financial reporting. The rules governing the standards that must be met for our management to assess our internal control over financial reporting are complex and require significant documentation, testing and possible remediation.

Any failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could severely inhibit our ability to accurately report our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. If we are unable to conclude that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, or if our independent registered public accounting firm determines we have a material weakness or significant deficiency in our internal control over financial reporting once that firm begins our reporting on internal control over financial reporting, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, the market price of our common stock could decline, and we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by Nasdaq, the SEC or other regulatory authorities. Failure to remedy any material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, or to implement or maintain other effective control systems required of public companies, could also restrict our future access to the capital markets.

We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. If we are unable to remediate these material weaknesses, or if we identify additional material weaknesses in the future or otherwise fail to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to accurately or timely report our financial condition or results of operations, which may adversely affect our business.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Effective internal control over financial reporting is necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports in a timely manner commensurate with the financial reporting requirements of an SEC registrant. Prior to the completion of the Merger, we were a private company and therefore had not designed or maintained internal controls over financial reporting commensurate with the financial reporting requirements of an SEC registrant.

Our management identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting primarily related to limited staffing levels within the finance and accounting departments that were not commensurate with our financial accounting and reporting requirements. We had to rely increasingly on outsourced service providers and specialists, without adequate resources to monitor such work and did not maintain appropriate segregation of duties. Based on this, we did not fully implement components of the COSO framework, resulting in material weaknesses either individually, or in the aggregate, in the control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring components.

68


However, the material weaknesses described above could result in a misstatement of one or more account balances or disclosures that would result in a material misstatement to the annual or interim consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected.

We are in the process of implementing measures designed to improve our internal control over financial reporting and remediate these material weaknesses. Such measures include, but are not limited to: hiring additional accounting personnel with expertise commensurate with our financial accounting and reporting requirements and that have the requisite experience to oversee outsourced service providers and specialists, upgrading our financial systems and implementing information technology general controls, establishing controls to identify, assess, and respond to the risks of material misstatement, and establishing controls to identify and account for certain non-routine, unusual or complex transactions in a timely fashion. While we are currently in the process of remediating the material weaknesses outlined above, we cannot assure you that these efforts will remediate the material weaknesses in a timely manner, or at all.

We expect to expand our clinical development, manufacturing and regulatory capabilities and potentially implement sales, marketing and distribution capabilities, and as a result, we may encounter difficulties in managing our growth, which could disrupt our operations.

As of September 30, 2023, we had 28 full-time employees, including 18 who are engaged in research and development activities, and no part-time employees. As our development progresses, we expect to experience significant growth in the number of our employees and the scope of our operations, particularly in the areas of clinical product development, business development, regulatory affairs and, if TOUR006 or any potential future product candidates receives marketing approval, sales, marketing and distribution. To manage our anticipated future growth, we must continue to implement and improve our managerial, operational and financial systems, expand our facilities and continue to recruit and train additional qualified personnel. Due to our limited financial resources and the limited experience of our management team in managing a company with such anticipated growth, we may not be able to effectively manage the expansion of our operations or recruit and train additional qualified personnel. Our choice to focus on multiple therapeutic areas may negatively affect our ability to develop adequately the specialized capability and expertise necessary for operations. The expansion of our operations may lead to significant costs and may divert our management and business development resources. Any inability to manage growth could delay the execution of our business plans or disrupt our operations.

We must attract and retain highly skilled employees in order to succeed. If we are not able to retain our current senior management team or to continue to attract and retain qualified scientific, technical and business personnel, our business may suffer.

To succeed, we must recruit, retain, manage and motivate qualified clinical, scientific, technical and management personnel and we face significant competition for experienced personnel. If we do not succeed in attracting and retaining qualified personnel, particularly at the management level, it could adversely affect our ability to execute our business plan and harm our operating results. An important element of our strategy is to take advantage of the R&D and other expertise of our current management. The loss of any one of our executive officers, other senior members of the leadership team, or other key personnel could result in a significant loss in the knowledge and experience that we, as an organization, possess and could cause significant delays, or outright failure, in the development and further commercialization of TOUR006 and any potential future product candidates.

There is intense competition for qualified personnel, including management, in the technical fields in which we operate and we may not be able to attract and retain qualified personnel necessary for the successful research, development and future commercialization, if any, of TOUR006 and any potential future product candidates.

69


Our Executive Severance and Change in Control Plan with certain of our executive officers may require us to pay severance benefits to any of those persons who are terminated in connection with a change in control of us, which could harm our financial condition or results.

Certain of our executive officers are parties to our Executive Severance and Change in Control Plan that contains change in control and severance provisions providing for aggregate cash payments for severance and other benefits and acceleration of vesting of stock options in the event of a termination of employment in connection with a change in control of us. The accelerated vesting of options could result in dilution to our existing stockholders and harm the market price of our common stock. The payment of these severance benefits could harm our financial condition and results. In addition, these potential severance payments may discourage or prevent third parties from seeking a business combination with us.

Our international operations may expose us to business, regulatory, political, operational, financial, pricing and reimbursement risks associated with doing business outside of the U.S.

Our business is subject to risks associated with conducting business internationally. Some of our manufacturing and clinical trial sites are located outside of the U.S. anti-corruptionFurthermore, if we or any future partner succeeds in developing TOUR006 or any of our potential future product candidates, we intend to market them in the EU and other jurisdictions in addition to the U.S. If approved, we or any future partner may hire sales representatives and conduct physician and patient association outreach activities outside of the U.S. Doing business internationally involves a number of challenges and risks, including but not limited to:

multiple, conflicting and changing laws and regulations, such as privacy and can face serious consequencesdata protection regulations, tax laws, export and import restrictions, employment laws, regulatory requirements and other governmental approvals, permits and licenses;

failure by us to obtain and maintain regulatory approvals for violations.the use of our products in various countries;

rejection or qualification of foreign clinical trial data by the competent authorities of other countries;

delays or interruptions in the supply of clinical trial material resulting from any events affecting raw material or component supply or manufacturing capabilities abroad;

additional potentially relevant third-party patent rights;

complexities and difficulties in obtaining, maintaining, protecting and enforcing our intellectual property rights;

difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations;

complexities associated with managing multiple payor reimbursement regimes, government payors or patient self-pay systems;

limits on our ability to penetrate international markets;

financial risks, such as longer payment cycles, difficulty collecting accounts receivable, the impact of inflation and local and regional financial crises on demand and payment for our products and exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations;

natural disasters, political, global geopolitical and economic instability, including geopolitical conflicts such as the ongoing war in Ukraine and hostilities in the Middle East, terrorism and political unrest, disease outbreaks, epidemics and pandemics; and

Talaris is subject70


regulatory and compliance risks that relate to anti-corruption laws, includingcompliance and record-keeping that may fall within the U.S. domestic bribery statute contained in 18 U.S.C. 201, the U.S. Travel Act, andpurview of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, its accounting provisions or its anti-bribery provisions or provisions of 1977,anti-corruption or anti-bribery laws in other countries.

Any of these factors could harm our ongoing international clinical operations and supply chain, as amended. These anti-corruption laws generally prohibit companieswell as any future international expansion and their employees, agents,operations and, intermediaries from authorizing, promising, offering, or providing, directly or indirectly, corrupt or improper payments or anything elseconsequently, our business, financial condition, prospects and results of value to recipientsoperations.

Our business could be materially and adversely affected in the publicfuture by the effects of disease outbreaks, epidemics and pandemics.

Disease outbreaks, epidemics and pandemics in regions where we may have clinical trial sites or private sector. Talaris can be held liableother business operations could adversely affect our business, including by causing significant disruptions in our operations and/or in the operations of third-party manufacturers and CROs upon whom we rely. Disease outbreaks, epidemics and pandemics have negative impacts on our ability to initiate new clinical trial sites, to enroll new patients and to maintain existing patients who are participating in our clinical trials, which may include increased clinical trial costs, longer timelines and delay in our ability to obtain regulatory approvals of TOUR006 and any potential future product candidates, if at all. Disease outbreaks, epidemics and pandemics also could adversely impact clinical trial results for TOUR006 or other future potential product candidates, such as by diminishing or eliminating their efficacy or by producing a safety concern, either through direct biological effects or through confounding of the corrupt or illegal activitiesdata collection and analysis. This adverse impact could terminate further development of Talaris’ agents and intermediaries, even if Talaris does not explicitly authorize or have actual knowledge of such activities. Violations of anti-corruption laws canTOUR006, result in substantial criminal finesa lack of product approval by the FDA or other regulatory authorities, delay the timing (and/or increase the cost) of a product approval by the FDA or other regulatory authorities, lead to a restrictive product label that significantly limits prescribing of an approved product, delay or preclude reimbursement by payors, or significantly limit or preclude the commercialization of TOUR006.

General supply chain issues may be exacerbated during disease outbreaks, epidemics and civil penalties, imprisonment,pandemics and may also impact the lossability of trade privileges, debarment, tax reassessments, breachour clinical trial sites to obtain basic medical supplies used in our trials in a timely fashion, if at all. If our CDMOs are required to obtain an alternative source of contractcertain raw materials and fraud litigation, reputational harm,components, for example, additional testing, validation activities and other consequences. Likewise, any investigation of potential violations of anti-corruption laws couldregulatory approvals may be required which can also have an adversea negative impact on Talaris’ reputation, Talaris’timelines. Any associated delays in the manufacturing and supply of drug substance and drug product for our clinical trials could adversely affect our ability to conduct ongoing and future clinical trials of TOUR006 on our anticipated development timelines. Likewise, the operations of our third-party manufacturers may be requisitioned, diverted or allocated by U.S. or foreign government orders. If any of our CDMOs or raw materials or components suppliers become subject to acts or orders of U.S. or foreign government entities to allocate or prioritize manufacturing capacity, raw materials or components to the manufacture or distribution of vaccines or medical supplies needed to test or treat patients in a disease outbreak, epidemic or pandemic, this could delay our clinical trials, perhaps substantially, which could materially and adversely affect our business.

Unfavorable global economic conditions could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Our results of operations could be adversely affected by general conditions in the global economy and in the global financial markets. Political developments impacting government spending and international trade, including current or potential government-imposed sanctions, potential government shutdowns and trade disputes and tariffs, may negatively impact markets and cause weaker macro-economic conditions. A severe or prolonged economic downturn could result in a variety of risks to our business, including, weakened demand for our current and future potential product candidates and our ability to raise additional capital when needed on acceptable terms, if at all. A weak or declining economy could also strain our suppliers, possibly resulting in supply disruption, or cause our customers to delay making payments for our services. Any of the foregoing could harm our business and we cannot anticipate all of the ways in which the current economic climate and financial condition.market conditions could adversely impact our business.

71


Our operations are vulnerable to interruption by fire, earthquake, power loss, telecommunications failure, terrorist activity and other events beyond our control, which could harm our business.

Our facilities may experience electrical blackouts as a result of a shortage of available electrical power. Future blackouts, which may be implemented by the local electricity provider in the face of high winds and dry conditions, could disrupt our operations. We have not undertaken a systematic analysis of the potential consequences to our business and financial results from a major earthquake, fire, power loss, terrorist activity or other disasters and do not have a comprehensive recovery plan for such disasters. In addition, we do not carry sufficient insurance to compensate us for actual losses from interruption of our business that may occur, and any losses or damages incurred by us could harm our business.

If product liability lawsuitsWe use and generate materials that may expose us to material liability.

Our research programs involve the use of hazardous materials, chemicals and radioactive and biological materials. We are brought against, Talarissubject to foreign, federal, state and local environmental and health and safety laws and regulations governing, among other matters, the use, manufacture, handling, storage and disposal of hazardous materials and waste products. We may incur substantial liabilitiessignificant costs to comply with these current or future environmental and health and safety laws and regulations. In addition, we cannot completely eliminate the risk of contamination or injury from hazardous materials and may be requiredincur material liability as a result of such contamination or injury. In the event of an accident, an injured party may seek to limit commercializationhold us liable for any damages that result. Any liability could exceed the limits or fall outside the coverage of any products that Talaris may develop.

Talaris faces an inherent risk of product liability exposure related to the testing of biopharmaceutical product candidates in human clinical trialsour workers’ compensation, property and will face an even greater risk if Talaris commercially sells any products that it may develop. Product liability claims may be brought against Talaris by subjects enrolled in Talaris’ clinical trials, patients, healthcare providers or others using, administering or selling Talaris’ products. If Talaris cannot successfully defend itself against claims that Talaris’ product candidates or products caused injuries, Talaris could incur substantial liabilities. Regardless of merit or eventual outcome, liability claims may result in:

decreased demand for any product candidates or products that Talaris may develop;

termination of clinical trial sites or entire trial programs;

injury to Talaris’ reputation and significant negative media attention;

withdrawal of clinical trial participants;

significant costs to defend the related litigation;

substantial monetary awards to study subjects or patients;

loss of revenue;

exhaustion of any available insurance and Talaris’ capital resources;

diversion of management and scientific resources from Talaris’ business operations;

the inability to commercialize any products that Talaris may develop; and

a decline in Talaris’ share price.

Talaris currently holds product liabilitybusiness interruption insurance coverage at a level that Talaris believes is customary for similarly situated companies and adequate to provide Talaris with insurance coverage for foreseeable risks, but which may not be adequate to cover all liabilities that Talaris may incur. Talariswe may not be able to maintain insurance coverageon acceptable terms, if at all. We currently carry no insurance specifically covering environmental claims.    

We may be exposed to increased litigation, including stockholder litigation, which could have an adverse effect on our business and operations.

We may be exposed to increased litigation from stockholders, suppliers and other third parties from time to time, including litigation due to the Merger. Such litigation may have an adverse impact on our business and results of operations or may cause disruptions to our operations. In addition, in the past, stockholders have initiated class action lawsuits against biotechnology companies following periods of volatility in the market prices of these companies’ common stock. Such litigation, if instituted against us, could cause us to incur substantial costs and divert management’s attention and resources, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

72


Our disclosure controls and procedures may not prevent or detect all errors or acts of fraud.

We designed our disclosure controls and procedures to reasonably assure that information we must disclose in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, and recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. We believe that any disclosure controls and procedures or internal controls and procedures, no matter how well-conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.

These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by an unauthorized override of the controls. Accordingly, because of the inherent limitations in our control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property

Our success depends in significant part upon our ability to obtain and maintain intellectual property protection for our products and technologies.

Our success depends in significant part on our ability and the ability of our current or future licensors, licensees, partners and collaborators to establish and maintain adequate intellectual property rights covering the product candidates, products and technologies that we plan to develop. In addition to taking other steps designed to protect our intellectual property, we have applied for, and intend to continue applying for, patents with claims covering our technologies, processes and product candidates when and where we deem it appropriate to do so. However, the patent prosecution process is expensive and time-consuming, and we and our current or future licensors, licensees, partners or collaborators may not be able to prepare, file and prosecute all necessary or desirable patent applications at a reasonable cost or in a timely manner. It is also possible that we or our current or future licensors, licensees, partners or collaborators will fail to identify patentable aspects of inventions made in the course of development and commercialization activities before it is too late to obtain patent protection for them. Pending and future patent applications filed by us or our current or future licensors’, licensees’, partners’ or collaborators’ may not result in patents being issued that protect our technology or product candidates, or products resulting therefrom, in whole or in part, or that effectively prevent others from commercializing competitive technologies and products.

We have filed five provisional patent applications in the U.S. to obtain patent rights to our inventions, with claims directed to methods of use, combination therapy and other technologies relating to our product candidates. There can be no assurance that any of these patent applications will issue as patents or, for those applications that do mature into patents, whether the claims of the patents will exclude others from making, using or selling our product or product candidates, or products or product candidates that are substantially similar to us for the same or similar uses. In countries where we have not and do not seek patent protection, third parties may be able to manufacture and sell products that are substantially similar or identical to our products or product candidates without our permission, and we may not be able to stop them from doing so.

Similar to other biotechnology companies, our patent position is highly uncertain and involves complex legal and factual questions. In this regard, we cannot be certain that we or our current or future licensors, licensees, partners or collaborators were the first to make an invention, or the first inventors to file a patent application claiming an invention in our owned or licensed patents or pending patent applications. In addition, even if patents are issued, given the amount adequateof time required for the development, testing and regulatory review of our product candidates, any patents protecting such candidates might expire before or shortly after the resulting products are commercialized. Moreover, the laws and regulations governing patents could change in unpredictable ways that could weaken the ability of us and our current or future licensors, licensees, partners or collaborators to obtain new patents or to enforce existing patents and patents we may obtain in the future. In any event, our patent rights and those of our current or future licensors, licensees, partners or collaborators may not effectively prevent others from commercializing competitive technologies and products.

73


In some circumstances, we may not have the right to control the preparation, filing and prosecution of patent applications, or to maintain or enforce the patents, covering technology that we license from or license to third parties and may be reliant on our current or future licensors, licensees, partners or collaborators to perform these activities, which means that these patent applications may not be prosecuted or maintained, and these patents may not be enforced, in a manner consistent with the best interests of our business. If our current or future licensors, licensees, partners or collaborators fail to establish, maintain, protect or enforce such patents and other intellectual property rights, such rights may be reduced or eliminated. If our current or future licensors, licensees, partners or collaborators are not fully cooperative or disagree with us as to the prosecution, maintenance or enforcement of any patent rights, such patent rights could be compromised.

In addition, the legal protection afforded to inventors and owners of intellectual property in countries outside of the U.S. may not be as broad or effective as that in the U.S. and we may be unable to acquire and enforce intellectual property rights outside the U.S. to the same extent as in the U.S., if at all. Accordingly, our efforts, and those of our licensors, licensees, partners and collaborators, to enforce intellectual property rights around the world may be inadequate to obtain a commercial advantage from the intellectual property that we own or license.

We do not currently own or have a license to any issued patents that cover TOUR006, although this product candidate is disclosed and its use claimed in our pending U.S. non-provisional applications. The patent landscape surrounding TOUR006 is crowded, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to secure patent protection that would adequately cover the use of such product candidate, that we will obtain sufficiently broad claims to be able to prevent others from selling competing products for the same or similar uses, or that we will be able to protect and maintain any patent protection that we initially secure.

Any changes we make to TOUR006 to cause it to have what we view as more advantageous properties may not be covered by its existing patent applications, and we may be required to file new patent applications and/or seek other forms of protection for any such altered product candidate.

We are dependent on patents, know-how and technology, both our own and licensed from others. In particular, we are dependent on our license agreements with Pfizer and Lonza. Any termination, or reduction or narrowing, of these licenses could result in the loss of significant rights and could harm our ability to commercialize TOUR006 and any potential future product candidates.

Disputes may also arise between us and our current licensor and future licensors regarding intellectual property subject to a license agreement, including:

the scope of rights granted under the license agreement and other interpretation-related issues;

whether and the extent to which our product candidates and technologies infringe intellectual property rights of the licensor that are not subject to the licensing agreement;

our right to sublicense patent rights and other rights to third parties under collaborative development relationships;

our diligence obligations with respect to the use of the licensed technology in relation to our development and commercialization of TOUR006 and any potential future product candidates, and the activities that are deemed to satisfy those diligence obligations;

the ownership of inventions and know-how resulting from the joint creation or use of intellectual property by our licensors and us and our partners; and

our payment obligations with respect to licensed intellectual property.

Additionally, with regard to the Pfizer License Agreement, if we fail to cure a material breach Pfizer has customary rights to terminate the Pfizer License Agreement. With regard to the Lonza License Agreement, Lonza has the right to terminate the Lonza License Agreement in the event of a change of control or if we contest the secret or substantial nature of the licensed know-how.

74


If disputes over intellectual property that we have licensed prevent or impair our ability to maintain our current or future licensing arrangements on acceptable terms, or if Pfizer or Lonza terminates their respective license agreement, we may be unable to successfully develop and commercialize the affected product candidates and technologies.

We are generally also subject to all of the same risks with respect to protection of intellectual property that we license, as it is for intellectual property that we own, which are described herein. If we, Pfizer, Lonza or any liabilityother current or future licensors fail to adequately protect any licensed intellectual property, our ability to commercialize products could suffer.

We may be unable to obtain intellectual property rights or technologies necessary to develop and commercialize TOUR006 or any potential future product candidates.

Several third parties are actively researching and seeking and obtaining patent protection in the fields of TED and Cardiovascular Disease, and there are issued third-party patents and published third-party patent applications in these fields. The patent landscape around our product candidate is complex, and we are aware of several third-party patents and patent applications containing claims directed to compositions-of-matter, methods of use and related subject matter, some of which pertain, at least in part, to subject matter that might be relevant to our product candidate. However, we may not be aware of all third-party intellectual property rights potentially relating to our product candidate and technologies, since patent applications are not published until eighteen months after their initial filing date. Therefore, we cannot know whether certain unpublished patent applications, if ultimately issued, may recover relevant uses of TOUR006 or other products of ours.

Depending on what patent claims ultimately issue and how courts construe the issued patent claims, as well as the ultimate formulation and methods of use of our product candidate, we may need to obtain a license to practice the technology claimed in such patents. There can be no assurance that such licenses will be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. If we are unable to successfully obtain rights to required third-party intellectual property rights or maintain the existing rights to third-party intellectual property rights we have, we might be unable to develop and commercialize TOUR006 or any potential future product candidates, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We could lose the ability to continue the development, manufacture and commercialization of TOUR006 or any potential future product candidates if we breach any license agreement with service providers and vendors related to those product candidates.

Our commercial success depends upon our ability, and the ability of our current and future licensors, licensees, partners and collaborators, to develop, manufacture, market and sell our products and product candidates and use our proprietary technologies without infringing the proprietary rights of third parties. A third-party may hold intellectual property rights, including patent rights, that are important or necessary to the development of our product candidates and products. As a result, we are a party to a number of technology and patent licenses that are important to our business, and we expect to enter into additional licenses in the future. If we fail to comply with the obligations under these agreements, including payment and diligence obligations, our licensors may have the right to terminate these agreements. In the event of a termination of these agreements, we may not be able to develop, manufacture, market or sell any product that is covered by the intellectual property rights that are the subject of these agreements or to engage in any other activities necessary to our business that require the freedom-to-operate afforded by the agreements, or we may face other penalties under the agreements. For example, in addition to the license agreements with Pfizer and Lonza described above we are party to license agreements with multiple vendors, under which we license technology used to produce TOUR006. We are required to obtain prior consent from some of these vendors to grant sub-licenses under these agreements. Therefore, these vendors may prevent us from granting sub-licenses to third parties, which could affect our ability to use certain desired manufacturers in order to manufacture our current and future product candidates. In the event of a termination of any of our license agreements, our ability to manufacture or develop any product candidates covered by these agreements may be limited or halted unless we can develop or obtain the rights to technology necessary to produce these product candidates.

75


Any of the foregoing could materially adversely affect the value of the product or product candidate being developed under any such agreement. Termination of these agreements or reduction or elimination of our rights under these agreements may result in having to negotiate new or amended agreements, which may not be available to us on equally favorable terms, or at all, or cause us to lose our rights under these agreements, including our rights to intellectual property or technology important to our development programs.

We may become involved in lawsuits or other proceedings to protect or enforce our intellectual property rights, which could be expensive, time-consuming and unsuccessful and have a material adverse effect on the success of our business.

Third parties may infringe patents or misappropriate or otherwise violate intellectual property rights owned or controlled by us or our current or future licensors, licensees, partners or collaborators. In the future, it may be necessary to initiate legal proceedings to enforce or defend these intellectual property rights, to protect trade secrets or to determine the validity or scope of intellectual property rights that are owned or controlled by us or our current or future licensors, licensees, partners or collaborators. Litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of management resources, which could harm our business and financial results.

If we or our current or future licensors, licensees, partners or collaborators initiate legal proceedings against a third party to enforce a patent covering a product candidate, the defendant could counterclaim that such patent is invalid or unenforceable. In patent litigation in the U.S., defendant counterclaims alleging invalidity or unenforceability are commonplace. Grounds for a validity challenge could be an alleged failure to meet any of several statutory requirements, including lack of novelty, obviousness or non-enablement. Grounds for an unenforceability assertion could be an allegation that someone connected with prosecution of the patent withheld relevant information from the USPTO, or made a misleading statement during prosecution. In an infringement or declaratory judgment proceeding, a court may decide that a patent owned by or licensed to us or our current or future licensors, licensees, partners or collaborators is invalid or unenforceable, or may refuse to stop the other party from using the technology at issue on the grounds that the patent does not cover the technology in question. An adverse result in any litigation proceeding could put one or more of the patents at risk of being invalidated, narrowed, held unenforceable or interpreted in such a manner that would not preclude third parties from entering the market with competing products.

Third parties may initiate legal proceedings against us or our current or future licensors, licensees, partners or collaborators to challenge the validity or scope of intellectual property rights we own or control. For example, generic or biosimilar drug manufacturers or other competitors or third parties may challenge the scope, validity or enforceability of patents owned or controlled by us or our current or future licensors, licensees, partners or collaborators. These proceedings can be expensive and time-consuming, and many of our adversaries may have the ability to dedicate substantially greater resources to prosecuting these legal actions than us. Accordingly, despite our efforts, we or our current or future licensors, licensees, partners or collaborators may not be able to prevent third parties from infringing upon or misappropriating intellectual property rights we own, control or have rights to, particularly in countries where the laws may not protect those rights as fully as in the U.S.

There is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during litigation because of the substantial amount of discovery required. Additionally, many foreign jurisdictions have rules of discovery that are different than those in the U.S. and that may arise. Talaris intendsmake defending or enforcing our patents extremely difficult. There also could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments. If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to expand Talaris’be negative, it could have a material adverse effect on the price of shares of our common stock.

Third-party pre-issuance submission of prior art to the USPTO, opposition, derivation, revocation, reexamination, inter partes review or interference proceedings, or other pre-issuance or post-grant proceedings, as well as other patent office proceedings or litigation in the U.S. or other jurisdictions brought by third parties against patents or patent applications owned or controlled by us or our current or future licensors, licensees, partners or collaborators, may affect the inventorship, priority, patentability or validity of these patents or patent applications. An unfavorable outcome could leave our technology or current and future product candidates without patent protection and allow third parties to commercialize its technology or product candidates without payment to us. Additionally, potential licensees, partners or collaborators could be dissuaded from collaborating with us to license, develop or commercialize current or future product candidates if the breadth or strength of protection provided by our patents and patent applications is threatened. Even if we successfully defend such litigation or proceeding, we may incur substantial costs and we may distract our management and other employees.

76


Third parties may initiate legal proceedings against us alleging that we infringe their intellectual property rights or we may initiate legal proceedings against third parties to challenge the validity or scope of the third-party intellectual property rights, the outcome of which would be uncertain and could have a material adverse effect on the success of our business.

Third parties may initiate legal proceedings against us or our current or future licensors, licensees, partners or collaborators alleging that we infringe their intellectual property rights. Alternatively, we may initiate legal proceedings to challenge the validity or scope of intellectual property rights controlled by third parties, including in oppositions, interferences, revocations, reexaminations, inter partes review or derivation proceedings before the USPTO or its counterparts in other jurisdictions. In this regard, we are aware of several third-party patents and patent applications containing claims directed to compositions-of-matter, methods of use and related subject matter, some of which pertain, at least in part, to subject matter that might be relevant to TOUR006. These proceedings can be expensive and time-consuming, and many of our adversaries may have the ability to dedicate substantially greater resources to prosecuting these legal actions than us.

In addition, we may be subject to claims that we or our employees have used or disclosed confidential information or intellectual property, including trade secrets or other proprietary information, of any such employee’s former employer, or that third parties have an interest in our patents as an inventor or co-inventor. Likewise, we and our current and future licensors, licensees, partners and collaborators may be subject to claims that former employees, partners, collaborators or other third parties have an interest in our owned or in-licensed patents, trade secrets or other intellectual property as an inventor or co-inventor or an owner of rights via assignment from such an inventor or co-inventor. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims.

Even if we believe third-party intellectual property claims are without merit, there is no assurance that a court would find in our favor on questions of infringement, validity, enforceability or priority. In order to successfully challenge the validity of any such U.S. patent in federal court, we would need to overcome a presumption of validity in favor of the granted third-party patent. This is a high burden, requiring us to present clear and convincing evidence as to the invalidity of any such U.S. patent claim.

An unfavorable outcome in any such proceeding could require us and our current or future licensors, licensees, partners or collaborators to cease using the related intellectual property or developing or commercializing the product or product candidate, or to attempt to license rights to us from the prevailing party, which may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. Additionally, we could be found liable for monetary damages, including treble damages and attorneys’ fees, if we are found to have willfully infringed a patent. A finding of infringement could prevent us from commercializing TOUR006 or any potential future product candidates or force us to cease some of our business operations, which could materially harm our business.

Reliance on third parties requires us to share our proprietary information, which increases the possibility that such information will be misappropriated or disclosed.

Because we rely on third parties for aspects of development, manufacture, or commercialization of TOUR006 and our technologies, or if we collaborate with third parties for the development or commercialization of our future product candidates and technologies, we must, at times, share proprietary information with them. We seek to protect our proprietary technology in part by entering into confidentiality agreements and, if applicable, material transfer agreements, consulting agreements or other similar agreements with our advisors, employees, third-party contractors and consultants prior to beginning research or disclosing proprietary information. These agreements typically limit the rights of the third parties to use or disclose our confidential information. Despite the contractual provisions employed when working with third parties, the need to share confidential information increases the risk that such information become known by our competitors, is inadvertently incorporated into the technology of others, or is disclosed or used in violation of these agreements. Given that our proprietary position is based, in part, on our know-how, a competitor’s discovery of our know-how or other unauthorized use or disclosure could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

77


In addition, these agreements typically restrict the ability of our advisors, employees, third-party contractors and consultants to publish data potentially relating to our know-how. Despite our efforts to protect our know-how, we may not be able to prevent the unauthorized disclosure or use of our technical know-how by the parties to these agreements. Moreover, we cannot guarantee that we have entered into such agreements with each party that may have or have had access to our confidential information or proprietary technology and processes. Monitoring unauthorized uses and disclosures is difficult, and we do not know whether the steps we have taken to protect our proprietary technologies will be effective. If any of the collaborators, scientific advisors, employees, contractors and consultants who are parties to these agreements breaches or violates the terms of any of these agreements, we may not have adequate remedies for any such breach or violation. Moreover, if confidential information that is licensed or disclosed to us by our partners, collaborators, or others is inadvertently disclosed or subject to a breach or violation, we may be exposed to liability to the owner of that confidential information. Enforcing a claim that a third-party illegally obtained and is using our proprietary information, like patent litigation, is expensive and time-consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. In addition, courts outside the U.S. are sometimes less willing to protect proprietary information.

We may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights throughout the world.

Filing, prosecuting and defending patents in all countries throughout the world would be prohibitively expensive, and our intellectual property rights in some countries outside the U.S. can be less extensive than those in the U.S. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as federal and state laws in the U.S., even in jurisdictions where we do pursue patent protection. Consequently, we may not be able to prevent third parties from practicing its or its licensors’ inventions in all countries outside the U.S., even in jurisdictions where we or our licensors pursue patent protection. Competitors may use our technologies in jurisdictions where we have not obtained patent protection to develop its own competing products and, further, may export otherwise infringing products to territories where it has patent protection, but enforcement is not as strong as that in the U.S.

Many countries have compulsory licensing laws under which a patent owner may be compelled to grant licenses to third parties. In addition, many countries limit the enforceability of patents against government agencies or government contractors. In these countries, the patent owner may have limited remedies, which could materially diminish the value of such patent. If we are forced to grant a license to third parties with respect to any patents relevant to our business, our competitive position may be impaired, and our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may be adversely affected.

In Europe, expected by the end of 2023, European applications will soon have the option, upon grant of a patent, of becoming a Unitary Patent which will be subject to the jurisdiction of the Unitary Patent Court (the “UPC”). This will be a significant change in European patent practice. As the UPC is a new court system, there is no precedent for the court, increasing the uncertainty of any litigation. It is our initial belief that the UPC, while offering a cheaper streamlined process, has potential disadvantages to patent holders, such as making a single European patent vulnerable in all jurisdictions when challenged in a single jurisdiction.

We, our CROs, our CDMOs, service providers, our current and potential future partners or other third parties upon which we rely, could experience a security incident, system disruption or failure, data loss, cyberattack, or similar event that could compromise the confidentiality, integrity and availability of systems and data, result in material disruptions to our business operations, lead to regulatory investigations or actions, litigation, fines and penalties, affect our reputation, revenue or profits, or otherwise harm our business.

We collect, store and transmit proprietary, confidential and sensitive information, including personal information (such as health-related data of clinical trial participants and employee information), in the course of our business. Similarly, our third-party providers possess or process certain of that information on our behalf. The secure maintenance of this information is critical to our operations and business strategy. Our technology systems and the information and data processed and stored by us or by third parties with whom we work (e.g., research collaborators, partners, CROs, CDMOs, contractors, consultants and other third parties), may be vulnerable to a variety of evolving online and offline threats that could result in security incidents, including unauthorized, unlawful, or accidental loss, damage, corruption, access, use or disclosure or misappropriation of such systems or data. A security incident or other interruption could disrupt our ability (and that of third parties upon whom we rely ) to operate our business and may have other adverse effects.

78


We and third parties on which we rely face threats that are constantly evolving and growing in frequency, sophistication, and intensity. For example, these threats may include (without limitation) malware, viruses, software vulnerabilities and bugs, software or hardware failure, hacking, denial of service attacks, social engineering (including phishing), ransomware, inside threats, credential stuffing or other cyberattacks, telecommunications failures, loss or theft of devices, data or other information technology assets, earthquakes, fires, floods and similar threats. Threats such as ransomware attacks, for example, are becoming increasingly prevalent and severe, and attackers are increasingly leveraging multiple attack methods to extort payment from victims, such as data theft and disabling systems. Extortion payments may alleviate the negative impact of a ransomware attack, but we may be unwilling or unable to make such payments due to, for example, applicable laws or regulations prohibiting such payments.

Security incidents may result from the actions of a wide variety of actors with a wide range of motives and expertise, including traditional hackers, our personnel or the personnel of the third parties we work with, sophisticated nation-states and nation-state-supported actors. During times of war and other major conflicts, we, the third party upon which we rely, and our customers may be vulnerable to a heightened risk of these attacks, including retaliatory cyber-attacks, that could materially disrupt our systems and operations, supply chain, and ability to produce, sell and distribute our goods and services.

We may be required to, or we may choose to, expend significant resources or modify our business activities (including our clinical trial activities) in an effort to protect against security incidents, particularly where required by applicable data privacy and security laws or regulations or industry standards. While we have developed systems and processes designed to protect the integrity, confidentiality and security of the confidential and personal information under our control, we cannot assure you that any security measures that we or our third-party service providers implement will be effective in preventing security incidents, disruptions, cyberattacks, or other similar events. There are many different cyber-crime and hacking techniques, and as such techniques continue to evolve, we and our third-party providers may be unable to anticipate or detect attempted security incidents, identify them before our information is exploited or react in a timely manner.

Certain functional areas of our workforce work remotely on a full- or part-time basis outside of our corporate network security protection boundaries or otherwise utilize network connections, computers and devices outside of our premises or network, which imposes additional risks to our business, including increased risk of industrial espionage, phishing and other cybersecurity attacks, and unauthorized dissemination of proprietary or confidential information, including personal information, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Additionally, future or past business transactions (such as acquisitions or integrations) could expose us to additional cybersecurity risks and vulnerabilities, as our systems could be negatively affected by vulnerabilities present in acquired or integrated entities’ systems and technologies.

In addition, our reliance on third-party service providers could introduce new cybersecurity risks and vulnerabilities, and other threats to our business operations. For example, we rely on third parties to operate critical business systems and process sensitive data in a variety of contexts, including, without limitation, cloud-based infrastructure, data center facilities, encryption and authentication technology, personnel email, and other functions. We also rely on third parties, including CROs, clinical trial sites and clinical trial vendors, to collect, store, and transmit sensitive data as part of our research activities. Our ability to monitor these third parties is limited, and these third parties may not have adequate information security measures in place and may expose us to cyberattacks and other security incidents. Supply-chain attacks have also increased in frequency and severity, and we cannot guarantee that third parties’ infrastructure in our supply chain or our third-party partners’ supply chains have not been compromised.

If our information systems or data, or that of the third parties on which we rely, are compromised, it could interrupt our operations, disrupt our development programs and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. For example, the loss or corruption of clinical trial data from completed or future clinical trials could result in delays in our regulatory approval efforts and significantly increase our costs to recover or reproduce the data. Likewise, we rely on third parties for the manufacture of TOUR006, to analyze clinical trial samples and to conduct clinical trials, and security incidents experienced by these third parties could have a material adverse effect on our business. Security incidents affecting us or the third parties we rely on or partner with could also result in substantial remediation costs and expose us to litigation (including class claims), regulatory enforcement action (for example, investigations, fines, penalties, audits and inspections), additional reporting requirements and/or oversight, fines, penalties, indemnification obligations, negative publicity, reputational harm, monetary fund

79


diversions, interruptions in our operations (including availability of data), financial loss and other liabilities and harms. Additionally, such incidents may trigger data privacy and security obligations requiring us to notify relevant stockholders or take other remedial or corrective actions, and may subject us to liability under laws and regulations that protect the privacy and security of personal information. Such disclosures and remediation efforts may be costly, and related requirements or the failure to comply with them could lead to adverse consequences. Even a perceived security incident or failure in compliance by us or a third-party partner may result in negative publicity, harm to our reputation, or other adverse effects.

Our contracts may not contain limitations of liability, and even where they do, there can be no assurance that limitations of liability in our contracts are sufficient to protect us from claims related to our data privacy and security obligations. Additionally, we cannot be certain that our insurance coverage will be adequate for data security liabilities actually incurred, will continue to be available to us on economically and commercially reasonable terms, or at all, or that any insurer will not deny coverage as to any future claim. The successful assertion of one or more large claims against us that exceed available insurance coverage, or the occurrence of changes in our insurance policies, including premium increases or the imposition of large deductible or co-insurance requirements, could adversely affect our reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to rapidly changing and increasingly stringent foreign and domestic laws and regulations relating to privacy, data protection and information security. The restrictions imposed by these requirements or our actual or perceived failure to comply with them could harm our business.

We may collect, use, transfer or otherwise process proprietary, confidential and sensitive information, including personal information (including health-related data), which subjects us to numerous evolving and complex data privacy and security obligations, including various laws, regulations, guidance, industry standards, external and internal privacy and security policies, contracts and other obligations that govern the processing of such information in connection with our business.

Outside the U.S., an increasing number of laws, regulations, and industry standards may govern data privacy and security. For example, the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation, (“EU GDPR”) and the United Kingdom’s GDPR, or UK GDPR and the Swiss Federal Data Protection Act, or Swiss FADP, (collectively, “European Data Protection Laws”) impose strict requirements for processing personal information, including relating to transfer of personal information to countries like the U.S. European Data Protection Laws and other relevant laws govern patient confidentiality and storage of personal health data, and may apply to us processing of personal information from clinical trial participants and other individuals located in the EEA, the UK, or Switzerland and, if TOUR006 or any potential future product candidates are approved, our possible commercialization of those products in the EEA, the UK, or Switzerland (as applicable). Companies that violate the EU GDPR can face private litigation, regulatory investigations and enforcement actions, prohibitions on data processing, other administrative measures, reputational damage and fines of up to include the salegreater of commercial products if Talaris obtains regulatory approval for Talaris’ product candidate20 million Euros or 4% of their worldwide annual revenue. The EU GDPR requires us to, among other things: give detailed disclosures about how we collect, use and share personal information; contractually commit to data protection measures in development,our contracts with vendors; maintain adequate data security measures; notify regulators and affected individuals of certain personal data breaches; meet extensive privacy governance and documentation requirements; and honor individuals’ data protection rights, including their rights to access, correct and delete their personal information. The UK has incorporated an amended version of the EU GDPR into UK law, commonly referred to as the UK GDPR, which is independent from, but Talarisat present materially aligned with, the EU GDPR, which together with the UK Data Protection Act of 2018, or UK DPA, covers the processing of personal information of UK residents. Non-compliance with UK GDPR may result in substantially similar adverse consequences to those in relation to the EU GDPR, including monetary penalties of up to £17.5 million or 4% of worldwide revenue, whichever is higher. Enforcement uncertainty and the costs associated with ensuring compliance may be unable

70


to obtain commercially reasonable product liability insurance for any products that receive regulatory approval. Large judgments have been awarded in class action lawsuits based on drugs that had unanticipated side effects. A successful product liability claim or series of claims brought against Talaris, particularly if judgments exceed Talaris’ insurance coverage, could decrease Talaris’ cashonerous and adversely affect Talaris’our business, operating results, prospects and financial condition.

Certain jurisdictions have enacted data localization restrictions or laws and regulations restricting cross-border transfers of personal information, except in limited circumstances where adequate safeguards are in place. In particular, regulators and courts in the EEA, the UK, and Switzerland have significantly restricted the transfer of personal information to the U.S. and other countries that have not been declared “adequate” for data protection purposes by a relevant governmental authority. Other jurisdictions may adopt similarly stringent interpretations of their data localization and cross-border data transfer laws. Although there are currently various mechanisms that may

80


be used to transfer personal information from the EEA, the UK, or Switzerland to the U.S. in compliance with European Data Protection Laws, currently the standard contractual clauses issued by the European Commission in June 2021 and the modifications mandated by UK and Swiss regulators are the most viable mechanism for us and similar companies in the U.S. to implement. However, these mechanisms (including the standard contractual clauses) are subject to legal challenges, and have recently come under significant scrutiny by EU regulators. For example, on May 22, 2023, the Irish Data Protection Commission announced that it had issued a €1.2 billion administrative fine against a U.S. technology and social media company for failing to ensure adequate protections for EU personal data transferred to the U.S. under the standard contractual clauses, as well as requiring the company to suspend future transfers of such EU personal data to the U.S. Although we and other clinical trial sponsors are not typically subject to some of the U.S. national security laws and requirements that raise concerns for data protection authorities under European Data Protection Laws, there is no assurance that we can satisfy or rely on measures like the standard contractual clauses to lawfully transfer personal information to the U.S.

Further, the free flow of personal data between the EU to the UK may eventually require additional safeguards. On June 28, 2021, the European Commission adopted an adequacy decision permitting flows of personal data between the EU and the UK to continue without additional safeguards (such as standard contractual clauses). The UK Government also adopted a reciprocal adequacy decision in respect of EEA member states permitting flows of personal data from the UK to the EEA. However, the European Commission’s UK adequacy decision will automatically expire in June 2025 unless the European Commission re-assesses and renews/extends that decision and remains under review by the European Commission during this period. The entry into force of the US-UK Data Access Agreement on October 3, 2022 may put at risk the European Commission’s adequacy decision granted to the UK. If such adequacy decision were to be withdrawn, personal data could not flow freely between the UK and the EU and additional safeguards would need to be adopted, which could result in additional compliance costs for us (e.g., engaging in new contract negotiations with third parties that aid in such data flows).

The relationship between the UK and the EU in relation to certain aspects of data protection laws remains unclear, and it is unclear how UK data protection laws and regulations will develop in the medium to longer term, and how data transfers to and from the UK will be regulated in the long term. The UK’s Data Protection and Digital Information Bill (No.2) (the “Bill”), was laid before the UK Parliament on March 8, 2023, introducing reforms intended to update and simplify the UK’s data protection framework, deviating from the EU GDPR. However, the Bill’s progress through Parliament is currently on pause following changes to the UK Government’s leadership. The Bill is expected to re-enter the legislative process in due course. Development of a secondary framework, particularly if it hinders cross-border data flows between the EU and UK, may result in increased compliance costs.

We continue to monitor changes in data protection laws related to the cross-border transfer of personal information; however, uncertainty remains regarding any future regulations, interpretations of existing law or guidance that may be issued, particularly by the EU authorities. If we are unable to implement a valid compliance solution for cross-border transfers of personal information, or if the requirements for a legally-compliant transfer are too onerous, we will face increased exposure to significant adverse consequences, including substantial fines, regulatory actions, as well as injunctions against the export and processing of personal information from the EEA, UK, Switzerland, or other countries that implement cross-border data transfer restrictions. Our inability to import personal information from the EEA, UK or Switzerland or other countries may also restrict or prohibit our clinical trial activities in those countries; limit our ability to collaborate with CROs, service providers, contractors and other companies subject to laws restricting cross-border data transfers; require us to increase our data processing capabilities in other countries at significant expense and may otherwise negatively impact our business operations. We may also become subject to new laws in the EEA and other jurisdictions that regulate cybersecurity and non-personal data, such as data collected through the internet of things. Depending on how these laws are interpreted, we may have to make changes to our business practices and products to comply with such obligations.

Additionally, other countries have enacted or are considering enacting similar cross-border data transfer restrictions and laws requiring local data residency, which could increase the cost and complexity of delivering our services and operating our business.

81


Privacy and data security laws in the U.S. at the federal, state and local level are increasingly complex and changing rapidly. For example, at the federal level, HIPAA, as amended by HITECH, imposes specific requirements relating to the privacy, security and transmission of individually identifiable health information. Additionally, at the state level, the privacy and data protection landscape is changing rapidly. Many states have enacted comprehensive privacy laws. For example, the CCPA, first took effect on January 1, 2020. The CCPA gives California residents certain rights similar to the individual rights given under the EU GDPR, including the right to access and delete their personal information, opt-out of certain personal information sharing and receive detailed information about how their personal information is used. The CCPA provides for civil penalties for violations, including statutory fines for noncompliance and a limited private right of action in connection with certain data breaches. In addition, the CCPA was amended by the California Privacy Rights Act of 2020 which became operative January 1, 2023. The CCPA as amended has expanded requirements, including in that it applies to personal information of business representatives and employees, and establishes a new regulatory agency to implement and enforce the law. While the CCPA contains an exemption for certain personal information processed in connection with clinical trials, we may process other personal information that is subject to the CCPA. Other states, such as Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, and Utah, have also passed comprehensive privacy laws that become effective in 2023, and similar laws have been passed or are being considered in several other states, as well as at the federal and local levels. The evolving patchwork of differing state and federal privacy and data security laws increases the cost and complexity of operating our business and increases our exposure to liability, including from third-party litigation and regulatory investigations, enforcement, fines, and penalties. We may also be bound by contractual obligations and our public statements related to data privacy and security, and our efforts to comply with such obligations may not be successful. We may publish privacy policies, marketing materials and other statements, such as compliance with certain certifications or self-regulatory principles, regarding data privacy and security. If these policies, materials or statements are found to be deficient, lacking in transparency, deceptive, unfair or misrepresentative of our practices, we may be subject to investigation, enforcement actions by regulators or other adverse consequences.

Our obligations related to data privacy and security are quickly changing in an increasingly stringent fashion. These obligations may be subject to differing applications and interpretations, which may be inconsistent or in conflict among jurisdictions. Monitoring, preparing for and complying with these obligations requires us to devote significant resources (including, without limitation, financial and time-related resources). These obligations may necessitate changes to our information technologies, systems and practices and to those of any third parties that process personal information on its behalf. In addition, these obligations may require us to change aspects of our business model. Although we endeavor to comply with applicable data privacy and security obligations, we may at times fail (or be perceived to have failed) to do so. Moreover, despite our efforts, our personnel or third parties upon whom we rely may fail to comply with such obligations, which could impact whether or not we are in compliance.

If we (or third parties upon which we rely) fail, or are perceived to have failed, to address or comply with data privacy, protection and security obligations, we could face significant consequences, including (without limitation): government enforcement actions (e.g., investigations, fines, penalties, audits, inspections and similar); litigation (including class-related claims); additional reporting requirements and/or oversight; bans on processing personal information; orders to destroy or not use personal information; and/or imprisonment of company officials. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business or financial condition, including but not limited to: loss of customers; interruptions or stoppages in our business operations (including clinical trials); inability to process personal information or to operate in certain jurisdictions; limited ability to develop or commercialize our products; expenditure of time and resources to defend any claim or inquiry; adverse publicity; or revision or restructuring of our operations.

Risks Related to Ownership of TalarisOur Common Stock

Risks Related to Talaris Common Stock

The market price of Talaris’our common stock mayis expected to be volatile, and one could lose all or part of their investment.

The tradingthe market price of Talaristhe common stock is likely to be highly volatile andmay drop.

The market price of our common stock could be subject to wide fluctuations in responsesignificant fluctuations. Some of the factors that may cause the market price of our common stock to various factors, somefluctuate include:

results of which are beyond Talaris’ control, including limited trading volume. In additionclinical trials and preclinical studies of our current and future potential product candidates, or those of our competitors or our existing or future collaborators;

failure to meet or exceed financial and development projections we may provide to the factors discussedpublic;

82


failure to meet or exceed the financial and development projections of the investment community;

failure of us to achieve the perceived benefits of the Merger as rapidly or to the extent anticipated by financial or industry analysts;

announcements of significant acquisitions, strategic collaborations, joint ventures or capital commitments by us or our competitors;

actions taken by regulatory agencies with respect to our current and future potential product candidates, clinical studies, manufacturing process or sales and marketing terms;

disputes or other developments relating to proprietary rights, including patents, litigation matters, and our ability to obtain patent protection for our technologies;

additions or departures of key personnel;

significant lawsuits, including patent or stockholder litigation;

if securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or if we issue adverse or misleading opinions regarding our business and stock;

changes in this “Risk Factors” sectionthe market valuations of similar companies;

general market or macroeconomic conditions or market conditions in the pharmaceutical and elsewherebiotechnology sectors;

sales of securities by us or our securityholders in this proxy statement/prospectus, these factors include:the future;

if we fail to raise an adequate amount of capital to fund our operations and continued development of our current and future potential product candidates;

trading volume of our common stock;

announcements by competitors of new commercial products, clinical progress or lack thereof, significant contracts, commercial relationships or capital commitments;

adverse publicity relating to IL-6

inhibitor and IL-6R

inhibitor product candidates, including with respect to other such products on the consummation of the Merger;market;

the introduction of technological innovations or new therapies that compete with the products and services of ours; and

period-to-period

actual or anticipated variations fluctuations in quarterly operating results;our financial results.

the outcome of Talaris’ evaluation of strategic alternatives;

Talaris’ cash position;

Talaris’ failure to meet the estimates and projections of the investment community or that Talaris may otherwise provide to the public;

changes in the market valuations of similar companies;

overall performance of the equity markets;

sales of Talaris common stock by Talaris or Talaris’ stockholders in the future;

trading volume of Talaris common stock;

changes in accounting practices;

ineffectiveness of Talaris’ internal controls;

disputes or other developments relating to intellectual property or proprietary rights, including patents, litigation matters and Talaris’ ability to obtain patent protection for Talaris’ technologies;

significant lawsuits, including intellectual property or stockholder litigation;

changes in the structure of health care payment systems;

general political and economic conditions; and

other events or factors, many of which are beyond Talaris’ control.

In addition,Moreover, the stock marketmarkets in general and the market for biopharmaceutical companies in particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuationssubstantial volatility that havehas often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of theseindividual companies. BroadThese broad market and industry factorsfluctuations may negativelyalso adversely affect the markettrading price of Talarisour common stock, regardlessstock. In addition, a recession, depression or other sustained adverse market event resulting from rising interest rates, inflation, global geopolitical conflict, or other macroeconomic conditions could materially and adversely affect our business and the value of Talaris’ actual operating performance.our common stock. In the past, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against companies following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities. This typesecurities, stockholders have often instituted class action securities litigation against such companies. Furthermore, market volatility may lead to increased shareholder activism if we experience a market valuation that activists believe is not reflective of litigation, if instituted,our intrinsic value. Activist campaigns that contest or conflict with our strategic direction or seek changes in the composition of our board of directors could resulthave an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.

83


Provisions in substantial costsour charter documents and a diversionunder Delaware law could make an acquisition of management’s attentionus more difficult and resources, which would harm Talaris’ business, financial condition, results of operation and future prospects.

Talaris’ principal stockholders and management own a significant percentage of Talaris’ stock and will be able to exert significant influence over matters subject to stockholder approval.

Talaris’ executive officers, directors, and 5% stockholders beneficially owned approximately 67.5% of Talaris’ outstanding voting common stock as of June 30, 2023. Therefore, these stockholders will have the ability to influence Talaris through this ownership position. Thesemay discourage any takeover attempts stockholders may be ableconsider favorable, and may lead to determine all matters requiring stockholder approval. For example, these stockholders may be able to control electionsentrenchment of directors, amendmentsmanagement.

Provisions of Talaris’ organizational documents, or approvalour amended and restated certificate of any merger, sale of assets, or other major corporate transaction, including the proposals in this proxy statement/prospectus. This may prevent or discourage unsolicited acquisition proposals or offers for Talaris common stock that one may feel are in their best interestincorporation, as one of Talaris’ stockholders.

71


Talaris’ business is affected by macroeconomic conditions, including rising inflation, interest ratesamended, and supply chain constraints.

Various macroeconomic factors could adversely affect Talaris’ businessamended and the results of Talaris’ operations and financial condition, including changes in inflation, interest rates and overall economic conditions and uncertainties such as those resulting from the current and future conditions in the global financial markets. For instance, rising interest rates have impacted Talaris’ net income. Recent supply chain constraints have led to higher inflation, which if sustained could have a negative impact on Talaris’ product development and operations. If inflation or other factors were to significantly increase Talaris’ business costs, Talaris’ ability to develop Talaris’ current pipeline and new therapeutic products may be negatively affected. Interest rates, the liquidity of the credit markets and the volatility of the capital markets could also affect the operation of Talaris’ business and Talaris’ ability to raise capital on favorable terms, or at all, in order to fund Talaris’ operations. Similarly, these macroeconomic factors could affect the ability of Talaris’ third-party suppliers and manufacturers to manufacture clinical trial materials for Talaris’ product candidates.

Risks Related to Talaris’ Filer Status

Talaris is an emerging growth company and a smaller reporting company, and Talaris cannot be certain if the reduced reporting requirements applicable to emerging growth companies and smaller reporting companies will make Talaris common stock less attractive to investors.

Talaris is an emerging growth company, as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (the “JOBS Act”), enacted in April 2012. For as long as Talaris continues to be an emerging growth company, Talaris may take advantage of exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies, including not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in this proxy statement/prospectus and Talaris’ periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding nonbinding advisory votes on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved.

Talaris could be an emerging growth company for up to five years following the completion of Talaris’ offering in May 2021, although circumstances could cause Talaris to lose that status earlier. Talaris will remain an emerging growth company until the earlier of (1) the last day of the fiscal year (a) following the fifth anniversary of the closing of Talaris’ initial public offering (“IPO”), (b) in which Talaris has total annual gross revenue of at least $1.235 billion or (c) in which Talaris is deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which requires the market value of Talaris common stock and non-voting common stock that are held by non-affiliates to exceed $700 million as of the prior June 30th, and (2) the date on which Talaris has issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt during the prior three-year period.

Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can also delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies. Talaris has elected to not “opt out” of this exemption from complying with new or revised accounting standards and, therefore, Talaris will adopt new or revised accounting standards at the time private companies adopt the new or revised accounting standard and will do so until such time that Talaris either (i) irrevocably elects to “opt out” of such extended transition period or (ii) no longer qualifies as an emerging growth company.

Even after Talaris no longer qualifies as an emerging growth company, it may still qualify as a “smaller reporting company,” which would allow it to continue to take advantage of many of the same exemptions from disclosure requirements, including not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in Talaris’ periodic reports and proxy statements.

Talaris cannot predict if investors will find Talaris common stock less attractive because it may rely on these exemptions applicable to emerging growth companies and smaller reporting companies. If some investors find Talaris common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for Talaris common stock and Talaris’ stock price may be more volatile.

Risks Related to Talaris’ Charter and Bylaws

Anti-takeover provisions under Talaris’ charter andrestated bylaws and Delaware law could delay or prevent a change ofchanges in control which could limit the market price of Talaris common stock and may prevent or frustrate attempts by Talaris’ stockholders to replace or remove Talaris’ current management.

Talaris’ charter and bylaws contain provisions that could delay or prevent a change of control of Talaris’ company or changes in management without the Talarisconsent of the board of directors. These provisions will include the following:

a board of directors divided into three classes serving staggered three-year terms, such that Talaris’not all members of the board will be elected at one time;

a prohibition on stockholder action through written consent, which requires that all stockholder actions be taken at a meeting of our stockholders;

a requirement that special meetings of stockholders might consider favorable. Somebe called only by the board of these provisions include:directors acting pursuant to a resolution approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the directors then in office;

advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals and nominations for election to our board;

a board of directors divided into three classes serving staggered three-year terms, such that not all members of the board will be elected at one time;

a prohibition on stockholder action through written consent, which requires that all stockholder actions be taken at a meeting of Talaris’ stockholders;

72


a requirement that special meetings of stockholders be called only by the board of directors acting pursuant to a resolution approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the directors then in office;

advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals and nominations for election to the Talaris board;

a requirement that no member of the Talarisour board may be removed from office by Talaris’our stockholders except for cause and, in addition to any other vote required by law, upon the approval of not less than two-thirds of all outstanding shares of Talaris’our voting stock then entitled to vote in the election of directors;

a requirement of approval of not less than two-thirds of all outstanding shares of Talaris’our voting stock to amend any bylaws by stockholder action or to amend specific provisions of Talaris’our charter; and

84


the authority of the board of directors to issue preferred stock on terms determined by the board of directors without stockholder approval and which preferred stock may include rights superior to the rights of the holders of common stock.

the authority of the board of directors to issue preferred stock on terms determined by the board of directors without stockholder approval and which preferred stock may include rights superior to the rights of the holders of common stock.

In addition, because Talaris is incorporatedthese provisions would apply even if we were to receive an offer that some stockholders may consider beneficial.

We will also be subject to the anti-takeover provisions contained in Delaware, Talaris is governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the DGCL, whichDGCL. Under Section 203, a corporation may prohibit certainnot, in general, engage in a business combinationscombination with stockholders owningany holder of 15% or more of Talaris’ outstanding voting stock. These anti-takeover provisions andits capital stock unless the holder has held the stock for three years or, among other provisions in Talaris’ charter and restated bylaws could make it more difficult for stockholders or potential acquirers to obtain control ofexceptions, the Talaris board or initiate actions that are opposed by the then-current board of directors and could also delay or impede a merger, tender offer, or proxy contest and other stockholders to elect directorshas approved the transaction.

Our bylaws provide that the Court of one’s choosing or cause Talaris to take other corporate actions one desires. Any delay or preventionChancery of a changethe State of control transaction or changes inDelaware is the Talaris board could cause the market price of Talaris common stock to decline.

Talaris’ bylaws designate certain courts as the sole and exclusive forum for certain types of actionssubstantially all disputes between us and proceedings that may be initiated by Talaris’our stockholders, which could limit Talaris’our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with Talarisus or Talaris’our directors, officers or other employees.

Talaris’Our bylaws provide that unless Talaris consents in writing to an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will beis the sole and exclusive forum for any state law claims for (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on itsour behalf, (ii)any action asserting a breach of fiduciary duty, any action asserting a claim against us arising pursuant to any provisions of breachthe DGCL, our certificate of fiduciary duty owed by any of its directors, officers, and employees to itincorporation or its stockholders, (iii)bylaws, or any action asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL, Talaris’ charter or bylaws or (iv) any action asserting a claimagainst us that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine, in each case subject to the Court of Chancery having personal jurisdiction over the indispensable parties named as defendants therein (the “Delaware Forum Provision”).doctrine. The Delaware Forum Provision willexclusive forum provision does not apply to any causes of actionactions arising under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act. Talaris’The amended and restated bylaws furtherwill also provide that unless it consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the federal district courts of the United States shallof America will be the sole and exclusive forum for resolvingthe resolution of any complaint asserting a cause or causes of action arising under the Securities Act (the “Federal Forum Provision”). In addition, Talaris’ bylaws provide that any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of Talaris common stock is deemed to have notice of and consented to the foregoing provisions; provided, however, that stockholders cannot and will not be deemed to have waived Talaris’ compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder.

Act. The Delaware Forum Provision and the Federal Forum Provision in Talaris’ bylaws may impose additional litigation costs on stockholders in pursuing any such claims. Additionally, the forum selection clauses in Talaris’ bylawsprovision may limit Talaris’ stockholders’a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that they findit finds favorable for disputes with Talarisus or Talaris’our directors, officers or other employees, which may discourage such lawsuits against Talarisus and Talaris’our directors, officers and employees even thoughother employees. Alternatively, if a court were to find the choice of forum provision contained in the certificate of incorporation and bylaws to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, if successful, might benefit Talaris’ stockholders. In addition, while the Delaware Supreme Court ruled in March 2020 that federal forum selection provisions purporting to require claims under the Securities Act be brought in federal court were “facially valid” under Delaware law, there is uncertainty as to whether other courts will enforce Talaris’ Federal Forum Provision. If the Federal Forum Provision is found to be unenforceable, Talariswe may incur additional costs associated with resolving such matters. The Federal Forum Provision may also impose additional litigation costs on stockholders who assert that the provision is not enforceable or invalid. The Court of Chancery of the State of Delawareaction in other jurisdictions, which could materially and the federal district courts of the United States may also reach different judgments or results than would other courts, including courts where a stockholder considering an action may be located or would otherwise choose to bring the action, and such judgments may be more or less favorable to Talaris than Talaris’ stockholders.

General Risk Factors

Adverse developments affecting the financial services industry, such as actual events or concerns involving liquidity, defaults, or non-performance by financial institutions or transactional counterparties, could adversely affect Talaris’ current and projected business operations and its financial condition and results of operations.

Adverse developments involving limited liquidity, defaults, non-performance or other adverse developments that affect financial institutions, transactional counterparties or other companies in the financial services industry or the financial services industry generally, or concerns or rumors about any events of these kinds or other similar risks, have in the past and may in the future lead to

73


market-wide liquidity problems. For example, on March 10, 2023, Silicon Valley Bank (“Silicon Valley Bank”), was closed by the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), as receiver. The Department of the Treasury, the Federal Reserve and the FDIC indicated that all depositors of Silicon Valley Bank would have access to all of their money, including funds held in uninsured deposit accounts, after only one business day of closure. Similarly, on May 1, 2023, First Republic Bank (“FRB”) was closed by the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation and the FDIC was appointed as receiver. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association (N.A.) acquired all of FRB’s deposit accounts and substantially all of its assets. The U.S. Department of Treasury, FDIC and Federal Reserve Board have announced a program to provide up to $25 billion of loans to financial institutions secured by certain of such government securities held by financial institutions to mitigate the risk of potential losses on the sale of such instruments, widespread demands for customer withdrawals or other liquidity needs of financial institutions for immediately liquidity may exceed the capacity of such program. There is no guarantee, however, that the U.S. Department of Treasury, FDIC and Federal Reserve Board will provide access to uninsured funds in the future in the event of the closure of other banks or financial institutions, or that they would do so in a timely fashion.

Talaris does not hold cash deposits or securities at Silicon Valley Bank or FRB and have not experienced any adverse impact to Talaris’ liquidity or to Talaris’ current and projected business operations, financial condition or results of operations. However, uncertainty remains over liquidity concerns in the broader financial services industry, and Talaris’ business, Talaris’ business partners, or industry as a whole may be adversely impacted in ways that Talaris cannot predict at this time.

Although Talaris assesses its banking and customer relationships as it believes necessary or appropriate, Talaris’ access to funding sources and other credit arrangements in amounts adequate to finance or capitalize Talaris’ current and projected future business operations could be significantly impaired by factors that affect Talaris, the financial institutions with which Talaris has credit agreements or arrangements directly, or the financial services industry or economy in general. These factors could include, among others, events such as liquidity constraints or failures, the ability to perform obligations under various types of financial, credit or liquidity agreements or arrangements, disruptions or instability in the financial services industry or financial markets, or concerns or negative expectations about the prospects for companies in the financial services industry. These factors could involve financial institutions or financial services industry companies with which Talaris has financial or business relationships, but could also include factors involving financial markets or the financial services industry generally.

The results of events or concerns that involve one or more of these factors could include a variety of material and adverse impacts on Talaris’ current and projected business operations and Talaris’ financial condition and results of operations. These could include, but may not be limited to delayed access to deposits or other financial assets or the uninsured loss of deposits or other financial assets and termination of cash management arrangements and/or delays in accessing or actual loss of funds subject to cash management arrangements.

In addition, widespread investor concerns regarding the U.S. or international financial systems could result in less favorable commercial financing terms, including higher interest rates or costs and tighter financial and operating covenants, or systemic limitations on access to credit and liquidity sources, thereby making it more difficult for Talaris to acquire financing on acceptable terms or at all. Any decline in available funding or access to Talaris’ cash and liquidity resources could, among other risks, adversely impact Talaris’ ability to meet Talaris’ operating expenses, financial obligations or fulfill Talaris’ other obligations, result in breaches of Talaris’ financial and/or contractual obligations or result in violations of federal or state wage and hour laws. Any of these impacts, or any other impacts resulting from the factors described above or other related or similar factors not described above, could have material adverse impacts on Talaris’ liquidity and Talaris’ current and/or projected business operations and financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, a critical vendor, CDMO, or business partner could be adversely affected by any of the liquidity or other risks that are described above as factors, which in turn, could have a material adverse effect on Talaris’ current and/or projected business operations and results of operations and financial condition. Any CDMO, business partner, or supplier bankruptcy or insolvency, or any breach or default by a CDMO, business partner, or supplier, or the loss of any significant supplier relationships, could result in material adverse impacts on Talaris’ current and/or projected business operations and financial condition.

Unfavorable global economic conditions could adversely affect Talaris’ business, financial condition or results of operations.

Talaris’ results of operations could be adversely affected by economic and political changes in the location in which Talaris, or Talaris’ suppliers and vendors, maintain operations. For example, out business may be generally exposed to the impact of political or civil unrest or military action, including the current conflict between Russia and Ukraine and, while Talaris does not have direct exposure to Ukraine, Talaris does have interests in securing regulatory approval in Europe. The approval process may be impacted based upon the events taking place there. Any of the foregoing could harm Talaris’ business and Talaris cannot anticipate all of the ways in which the current economic climate and financial market conditions could adversely impact Talaris’ business.

Talaris incurs significant increased costs as a result of operating as a public company, and Talaris’ management is required to devote substantial time to compliance initiatives.

74


As a public company, Talaris incurs significant legal, accounting, and other expenses that it did not incur as a private company. Talaris is subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, which will require, among other things, that Talaris files with the SEC, annual, quarterly, and current reports with respect to Talaris’ business and financial condition. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, as well as rules subsequently adopted by the SEC and The Nasdaq Global Market to implement provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, impose significant requirements on public companies, including requiring establishment and maintenance of effective disclosure and financial controls and changes in corporate governance practices. Further, in July 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) was enacted. There are significant corporate governance and executive compensation related provisions in the Dodd-Frank Act that require the SEC to adopt additional rules and regulations in these areas, such as “say on pay” and proxy access. Recent legislation permits emerging growth companies to implement many of these requirements over a longer period and up to five years from the pricing of the IPO. Talaris intends to take advantage of this new legislation but cannot guarantee that Talaris will not be required to implement these requirements sooner than budgeted or planned and thereby incur unexpected expenses. Stockholder activism, the current political environment, and the current high level of government intervention and regulatory reform may lead to substantial new regulations and disclosure obligations, which may lead to additional compliance costs and impact the manner in which Talaris operates its business in ways it cannot currently anticipate.

Talaris expects the rules and regulations applicable to public companies to substantially increase Talaris’ legal and financial compliance costs and to make some activities more time-consuming and costly. If these requirements divert the attention of Talaris’ management and personnel from other business concerns, they could have a material adverse effect on Talaris’our business, financial condition and results of operations. The increased costs

We do not anticipate that we will decrease Talaris’ net income or increase Talaris’ net loss and may require Talaris to reduce costs in other areas of Talaris’ business or increase the prices of Talaris’ products or services. For example, Talaris expects these rules and regulations to make it more difficult and more expensive for Talaris to obtain director and officer liability insurance and Talaris may be required to incur substantial costs to maintain the same or similar coverage. Talaris cannot predict or estimate the amount or timing of additional costs Talaris may incur to respond to these requirements. The impact of these requirements could also make it more difficult for Talaris to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on the Talaris board, the Talaris board committees, or as executive officers.

Actions of activist stockholders could cause Talaris to incur substantial costs, divert management’s attention and resources, and have an adverse effect on Talaris’ business.

Stockholder activism, which could take many forms or arise in a variety of situations, has been increasing recently. From time to time, Talaris may be subject to proxy solicitations or proposals by activist stockholders urging Talaris to take certain corporate actions, or otherwise effect changes or assert influence on the Talaris board and management. For example, volatilitypay any cash dividends in the priceforeseeable future.

The current expectation is that we will retain our future earnings, if any, to fund the growth of Talarisour business as opposed to paying dividends. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our common stock or other reasons may inwill be our stockholders’ sole source of gain for the future cause Talaris to become the target of stockholder activism. If activist stockholder activities ensue, Talaris’ business could be adversely affected because responding to proxy contests and reacting to other actions by activist stockholders can be costly and time-consuming, disrupt Talaris’ operations and divert the attention of management and Talaris’ employees. For example, Talaris may be required to retain the services of various professionals to advise Talaris on activist stockholder matters, including legal, financial and communications advisors, the costs of which may negatively impact Talaris’ future financial results. In addition, perceived uncertainties as to Talaris’ future direction, strategy or leadership created as a consequence of activist stockholder initiatives may result in the loss of potential business opportunities, harm Talaris’ ability to enter into strategic transactions, harm Talaris’ ability to attract new investors, customers, employees and joint venture partners and cause Talaris’ stock price to experience periods of volatility or stagnation.foreseeable future.

If Talaris fails to establish and maintain proper and effective internal control over financial reporting, Talaris’ operating results and Talaris’ ability to operate Talaris’ business could be harmed.

Ensuring that Talaris has adequate internal financial and accounting controls and procedures in place so that Talaris can produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis is a costly and time-consuming effort that needs to be re-evaluated frequently. Talaris’ internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Talaris has begun the process of documenting, reviewing, and improving Talaris’ internal controls and proceduresAn active trading market for compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which will require annual management assessment of the effectiveness of Talaris’ internal control over financial reporting. Talaris has begun recruiting additional finance and accounting personnel with certain skill sets that Talaris will need as a public company.

Implementing any appropriate changes to Talaris’ internal controls may distract Talaris’ officers and employees, entail substantial costs to modify Talaris’ existing processes, and take significant time to complete. These changesour common stock may not however,develop and our stockholders may not be effective in maintaining the adequacy of Talaris’ internal controls, and any failureable to maintain that adequacy, or consequent inability to produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis, could increase Talaris’ operating costs and harm Talaris’ business. In addition, investors’ perceptions that Talaris’ internal controls are inadequate or that Talaris is unable to produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis may harm Talaris’ stock price and make it more difficult for Talaris to effectively market and sell Talaris’ service to new and existing customers.

75


Talaris may be at an increased risk of securities class action litigation.

Historically, securities class action litigation has often been brought against a company following a decline in the market price of its securities. This risk is especially relevant for Talaris because biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies have experienced significant stock price volatility in recent years. If Talaris were to be sued, it could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources, which could harm Talaris’ business.

76


Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None.

Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities

On May 11, 2021, we completed our initial public offering, (our “IPO”), in which we issued and sold 8,825,000resell their shares of common stock $0.0001 par value per share,for a profit, if at a priceall.

Prior to the Merger, there was no public of $17.00 per share. The offer and sale of themarket for shares in the IPO was registered under the Securities Act pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-255316) that was filed with the SEC on May 3, 2021 and declared effective on May 6, 2021. The underwriters of the offering were Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, SVB Leerink LLC, Evercore Group L.L.C. and Guggenheim Securities, LLC. Our IPO commenced on May 7, 2021.

We raised approximately $137.2 million in net proceeds after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions of $10.5 million and other offering expenses of approximately $2.4 million payable by us. No underwriting discounts and commissions or offering expenses were paid directly or indirectly to any of our directors or officers (or their affiliates) or persons owning ten percent or more of any classcapital stock. An active trading market for shares of our equity securitiescommon stock may never develop or be sustained. If an active market for our common stock does not develop or is not sustained, it may be difficult for our stockholders to any other affiliates.sell their shares at an attractive price or at all.

We are holding a significant portion of the balance of the net proceeds in a variety of capital preservation investments, including money market funds, short-term investment-grade, interest bearing instruments and U.S. government securities. Since our IPO through February 2023, there had been no material change in the planned use of proceeds, as described in our final prospectus filed with the SEC on May 10, 2021 pursuant to Rule 424(b) under the Securities Act. In February 2023, we announced a comprehensive review of strategic alternatives focused on maximizing stockholder value, including, but not limited to, an acquisition, merger, possible business combinations and/or a divestiture of our cell therapy CMC capabilities. After a comprehensive review of strategic alternatives, including identifying and reviewing potential candidates for a strategic transaction, on June 22, 2023, we entered into the Merger Agreement with Tourmaline, pursuant to which our wholly-owned subsidiary will merge with and into Tourmaline, with Tourmaline surviving as our wholly-owned subsidiary. The planned use of our remaining net proceeds from our IPO will be used, in part, for the execution of the Merger. We expect to devote substantial time and resources to executing the Merger and/or any strategic alternatives that our board of directors believes will maximize stockholder value. There can be no assurances that the Merger, any particular course of action, business arrangement or transaction, or series of transactions, will be pursued, successfully consummated or lead to increased stockholder value, or that we will make any additional cash distributions to our stockholders.

Issuer Repurchases of Equity Securities85


ITEM 2.

UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES, USE OF PROCEEDS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

None.

Not applicable.

ITEM 3.

DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

Not applicable.

ITEM 4.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

ITEM 5.

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 5. Other Information.Effective November 10, 2023, we entered into a side letter (the “Side Letter”) with Ryan Robinson, our Interim Chief Financial Officer, Vice President, Finance and Controller. Pursuant to the Side Letter, we agree to pay Mr. Robinson an additional $3,750 per semi-monthly pay period, less applicable withholdings, during the period Mr. Robinson serves as our Interim Chief Financial Officer, with such payments effective as of October 19, 2023 (such payments, the “Additional Compensation”). The Additional Compensation is in addition to, and not in lieu of the base salary, benefits and other terms as described in Mr. Robinson’s existing offer letter dated June 7, 2023 (the “Offer Letter”).

None.Effective November 10, 2023, we entered into a participation agreement with Mr. Robinson under our Executive Severance and Change in Control Plan (the “Severance Plan”). Pursuant to the Severance Plan and the participation agreement thereunder, if, within the 3 month period prior to or the 12 month period following a “change in control” (as defined in the Severance Plan), we terminate the employment of Mr. Robinson without “cause” (excluding death or disability) or Mr. Robinson resigns for “good reason” (each, as defined in the Severance Plan) and within no more than 60 days of such termination the Mr. Robinson executes and does not revoke a separation agreement and release of claims, Mr. Robinson will be entitled to receive (i) a lump sum payment equal to the sum of (a) six months of then current annual base salary and (b) a multiple of then current annual target bonus in an amount equal to the then current annual target bonus, multiplied by the quotient of the Severance Period (as defined in the participation agreement) divided by 12, less applicable withholdings, (ii) payment of premiums to maintain group health insurance continuation benefits pursuant to COBRA for up to six months for Mr. Robinson and Mr. Robinson’s respective eligible dependents, and (iii) vesting acceleration as to 100% of the then-unvested shares subject to then outstanding equity awards (and in the case of awards subject to performance-based vesting conditions, such performance-based awards shall vest as specified in the applicable award agreement governing such award).

77


Pursuant to the Severance Plan and the participation agreements thereunder, if, outside of the 3 month period prior to or the 12 month period following a “change in control”, we terminate the employment of Mr. Robinson without “cause” (excluding death or disability) or Mr. Robinson resigns for “good reason” and within 60 days of such termination Mr. Robinson executes and does not revoke a separation agreement and release of claims, Mr. Robinson will be entitled to receive (i) continuing payments of his or her then current annual base salary for a period of three months, and (ii) payment of premiums to maintain group health insurance continuation benefits pursuant to COBRA for Mr. Robinson and Mr. Robinson’s respective eligible dependents for up to three months.

Item 6. Exhibits.Pursuant to the Severance Plan, in the event any payment to Mr. Robinson would be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended (the “Code”), as a result of a payment being classified as a parachute payment under Section 280G of the Code, Mr. Robinson will receive such payment as would entitle Mr. Robinson to receive the greatest after-tax benefit, even if it means that we pay Mr. Robinson a lower aggregate payment so as to minimize or eliminate the potential excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code.

The foregoing descriptions of the Side Letter, Offer Letter and Severance Plan and related participation agreement do not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Side Letter, Offer Letter and Severance Plan and related participation agreement, copies of which are filed as Exhibits 10.14, 10.7 and 10.1 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, respectively, and are incorporated by reference herein.

ExhibitITEM 6.

Number

EXHIBITS

      Incorporated by Reference

Exhibit

No.

  Description  Form  File No.  Exhibit  Filing Date

3.1*

  Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended through October 19, 2023.        

3.2

  Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant.  8-K  001-40384  3.2  May 11, 2021

10.1#

  Tourmaline Bio, Inc. Executive Severance and Change in Control Plan and Form of Participation Agreement.  8-K  001-40384  10.1  October 27, 2023

10.2#

  Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy.  8-K  001-40384  10.2  October 27, 2023

10.3#

  Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Registrant and each of its directors and executive officers.  S-4  333-273335  10.6  July 20, 2023

10.4#

  Offer Letter, dated as of October 18, 2023, by and between the Registrant and Sandeep Kulkarni, M.D.  8-K  001-40384  10.2  October 20, 2023

10.5#

  Offer Letter, dated as of October 18, 2023, by and between the Registrant and Brad Middlekauff, J.D.  8-K  001-40384  10.3  October 20, 2023

10.6#

  Offer Letter, dated as of October 18, 2023, by and between the Registrant and Susan Dana Jones, Ph.D.  8-K  001-40384  10.4  October 20, 2023

10.7#

  Offer Letter, dated as of June 7, 2023, by and between the Registrant and Ryan Robinson.  8-K  001-40384  10.5  October 20, 2023

10.8#

  Tourmaline Bio, Inc. 2022 Equity Incentive Plan and forms of award agreements thereunder.  S-4/A  333-273335  10.1  September 13, 2023

86


10.9#

  Tourmaline Bio, Inc. 2023 Equity Incentive Plan.  8-K  001-40384  10.7  October 20, 2023

10.10#

  Forms of Option Grant Notice, Option Agreement and Notice of Exercise under Tourmaline Bio, Inc. 2023 Equity Incentive Plan.  8-K  001-40384  10.8  October 20, 2023

10.11#

  Forms of Restricted Stock Unit Grant Notice and Award Agreement under Tourmaline Bio, Inc. 2023 Equity Incentive Plan.  8-K  001-40384  10.9  October 20, 2023

10.12#

  Tourmaline Bio, Inc. 2023 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.  8-K  001-40384  10.10  October 20, 2023

10.13

  Amendment No. 1 to Strategic Advisor Agreement, by and between the Registrant and Scott Requadt, dated August 25, 2023.  S-4/A  333-273335  10.22  August 25, 2023

10.14#*

  Side Letter, dated as of November 10, 2023, by and between the Registrant and Ryan Robinson.        

31.1*

  Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.        

31.2*

  Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.        

32.1*+

  Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.        

101.ins*

  Instance Document        

101.sch*

  Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document        

101.cal*

  Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document        

101.def*

  Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document        

101.lab*

  Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document        

101.pre*

  Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document        

104*

  Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)        

*

DescriptionFiled herewith.

+

   2.1+

AgreementFurnished herewith and Plannot deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Merger, dated asSection 18 of June 22, 2023, by and among Talaris Therapeutics, Inc., Terrain Merger Sub, Inc. and Tourmaline Bio, Inc. (incorporated by reference Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant's 8-K (File No. 001-40384) filed on June 22, 2023)

   3.1

Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant's Form 8-K (File No. 001-40384) filed on May 11, 2021).

   3.2

Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant's Form 8-K (File No. 001-40384) filed on May 11, 2021).

  10.1

Retention Agreement between the Registrant and Mary Kay Fenton, dated April 14, 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Form 8-K (File No. 001-40384) filed on April 14, 2023).

  10.2

Strategic Advisor Agreement, by and between the Registrant and Scott Requadt, dated May 26, 2023(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Registrant's Form S-4 (File No. 333-273335) filed on July 19, 2023).

  31.1*

Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting and Financial Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuantamended, and shall not be deemed to Section 302 ofbe incorporated by reference into any filing under the Sarbanes-OxleySecurities Act of 2002.

  32.1**

Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting and Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,1933, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 ofamended, or the Sarbanes-OxleySecurities Exchange Act of 2002.1934, as amended.

#

101.INS

Inline XBRL Instance Document – the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.

101.SCH

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

104

Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document)Indicates a management contract or any compensatory plan, contract or arrangement.

* Filed herewith.87


SIGNATURE

** The certifications furnished in Exhibits 32.1 hereto are deemed to be furnished with this Quarterly Report and will not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.

+ Exhibits and/or schedules have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(a)(5) of Regulation S-K. The registrant hereby undertakes to furnish supplementally copies of any of the omitted exhibits and schedules upon request by the SEC; provided, however, that the registrant may request confidential treatment pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the Exchange Act for any exhibits or schedules so furnished.

# Indicates a management contract or any compensatory plan, contract or arrangement.

78


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

TOURMALINE BIO, INC.

Date: November 14, 2023
By:

TALARIS THERAPEUTICS, INC./s/ Sandeep Kulkarni

Name:Sandeep Kulkarni
Title:

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer

)

Date: AugustNovember 14, 2023

By:

By:

/s/ Mary Kay FentonRyan Robinson

Mary Kay Fenton

Name:Ryan Robinson

Title:

Interim Chief Executive Officer and President and Chief Financial Officer, Vice President, Finance and Controller

((Principal ExecutiveFinancial and Accounting Officer and Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)

)

7988