NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 (UNAUDITED)

NOTE 1     OVERVIEW                   

Forward Industries, Inc. was incorporated under the laws of the State of New York and began operations in 1961 as a manufacturer and distributor of specialty and promotional products. The Company designs, markets, and distributes carry and protective solutions, primarily for hand held electronic devices. Its principal customer market is original equipment manufacturers, or “OEMs” (or the contract manufacturing firms of these OEM customers), that either package the Company’s products as accessories “in box” together with their product offerings, or sell them through their retail distribution channels, which the Company services in its OEM division. The Company’s OEM products include carrying cases and other accessories for medical monitoring and diagnostic kits, portable consumer electronic devices (such as smartphones, tablets, personnelpersonal computers, notebooks, and GPS devices), and a variety of other portable electronic and non-electronic products (such as firearms, sporting, and other recreational products). The Company’s OEM customers are located in the Americas, the EMEA Region, and the APAC Region. 

On June 21, 2012, the Company determined to exit its global retail business (“discontinued operations”) and focus solely on growing its OEM business.  The Company is currently expanding its product rangedecision to include caseseliminate the retail division was primarily driven by the longer than estimated path to bring it to profitability and accessories for a wide array of consumer electronic devices, including smartphones, tablets, portable computersthe strong top line growth and other electronic devices; as well as developing its capability to market and distribute such products to customerscost rationalizations in the Americas and EMEA Region throughOEM business. As such, the OEM,Company has reflected the retail and corporate channels. The Company’s product range destined for retail distribution includes both “Forward”-branded and non-“Forward” branded cases and accessories. Duringbusiness as discontinued operations in the three and six month periods ended March 31, 2012, net sales of Retail products accounted for approximately 13% and 12% of the Company’s total net sales.accompanying consolidated financial statements.

The Company does not manufacture any of the products that it designs, markets, and distributes.  The Company sources substantially all of its products from independent suppliers in China and the United States.China. 

In the opinion of management, the accompanying consolidated financial statements presented in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q reflect all normal recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position and results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented herein, but are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2012. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company's audited consolidated financial statements included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, and with the disclosures and risk factors presented herein and therein, respectively. The September 30, 2011 balance sheet has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 2     ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Accounting Estimates

The preparation of the Company's consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Forward Industries, Inc. ("Forward") and its wholly owned subsidiaries (Forward US, Forward Switzerland, Forward HK, Forward APAC, and Forward UK). All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Reclassifications

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified, in addition to discontinued operations as disclosed in Note 3, to conform to the current period presentation.

7

8

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 (UNAUDITED)

NOTE 2     ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents consist primarily of cash on deposit and highly liquid money market accounts, short-term bonds, and certificates of deposit with original contractual maturities of three months or less, predominately in U.S. dollar denominated instruments. The Company may purchase these short-term bonds with anticipated maturity of 90 days or less at a premium or discount. The Company records these investments as cash and cash equivalents net of amortization of premium or discount. The Company minimizes its credit risk associated with cash and cash equivalents by investing in high quality instruments and by periodically evaluating the credit quality of the primary financial institution issuers of such instruments. The Company holds cash and cash equivalents at major financial institutions in the United States, at which cash amounts may significantly exceed FDIC insured limits. At March 31,June 30, 2012, this amount was approximately $7.3$4.2 million. Historically, the Company has not experienced any losses due to such cash concentrations.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable consist of unsecured trade accounts with customers or their contract manufacturers. The Company performs periodic credit evaluations of its customers including an evaluation of days outstanding, payment history, recent payment trends, and perceived credit worthiness, and believes that adequate allowances for any uncollectible receivables are maintained. Credit terms to customers generally range from net thirty (30) days to net ninety (90) days. The Company has not historically experienced significant credit or collection problems with its OEM customers or their contract manufacturers. In addition, the Company maintains credit insurance that provides up to 90% coverage on trade accounts with customers in the EMEA region. The Company did not require anAt June 30, 2012, no allowance for doubtful accounts at March 31, 2012.relating to the Company’s continuing operations was deemed necessary. At September 30, 2011, the allowance for doubtful accounts was approximately $14,000.

Inventories

Inventories consist primarily of finished goods and are stated at the lower of cost (determined by the first-in, first-out method) or market.  Based on management’s estimates, an allowance is made to reduce excess, obsolete, or otherwise un-saleable inventories to net realizable value. The allowance is established through charges to cost of goods sold onin the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. As reserved inventory is disposed of, the Company charges off the associated allowance.  In determining the adequacy of the allowance, management’s estimates are based upon several factors, including analyses of inventory levels, historical loss trends, sales history, and projections of future sales demand. The Company’s estimates of the allowance may change from time to time based on management’s assessments, and such changes could be material. At March 31,June 30, 2012, the allowance for obsolete inventory of the Company’s continuing operations was approximately $12,000.$90,000. At September 30, 2011, no allowance for obsolete inventory was deemed necessary.

9

8

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 (UNAUDITED)

NOTE 2     ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consist of furniture, fixtures, and equipment and leasehold improvements and are recorded at cost. Expenditures for major additions and improvements are capitalized, and minor replacements, maintenance, and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. When property and equipment are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is included in the results of operations for the respective period. Depreciation is provided over the estimated useful lives of the related assets using the straight-line method for financial statement purposes.method. The estimated useful life for furniture, fixtures and equipment ranges from three to ten years. Amortization of leasehold improvements is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the remaining lease term or the estimated useful lives of the improvements. For the three-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company recorded approximately $31,000$30,000 and $15,000$17,000 of depreciation and amortization expense, respectively.respectively, in continuing operations. For the six-monthnine-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company recorded approximately $61,000$83,000 and $28,000$45,000 of depreciation and amortization expense, respectively.respectively, in continuing operations. Depreciation and amortization for production related property and equipment is included as a component of costs of goods sold in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Depreciation and amortization for selling and general and administrative related property and equipment is included as a component of operating expenses of continuing operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for its income taxes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which requires, among other things, recognition of future tax benefits and liabilities measured at enacted rates attributable to temporary differences between financial statement and income tax bases of assets and liabilities and to net tax operating loss carryforwards to the extent that realization of these benefits is more likely than not. The Company periodically evaluates the realizability of its net deferred tax assets.   See Note 7 to these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company’s policy is to account for interest and penalties relating to income taxes, if any, in “income tax expense” in its consolidated statement of operations and include accrued interest and penalties within “accrued liabilities” onin its consolidated balance sheets. For the three-monththree and nine-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2012 and 2011, presented in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations, no income tax related interest or penalties were assessed or recorded.

Revenue Recognition

The Company generally recognizes revenue from product sales to its customers when: (1) title and risk of loss are transferred (in general, these conditions occur at either point of shipment or point of destination, depending on the terms of sale); (2) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (3) the Company has no continuing obligations to the customer; and (4) collection of the related accounts receivable is reasonably assured. The Company offers certain of its customers a variety of sales and incentive programs, including discounts, allowances, and co-op advertising and marketing funds; such amounts are estimated and recorded as a reduction in revenue.

Shipping and Handling Costs

The Company classifies certain shipping and handling costs (including inbound and outbound freight charges, purchasing and receiving costs, inspection costs, warehousing costs, internal transfer costs, and other costs associated with the Company’s Hong Kong distribution facility and network) as a component of cost of goods sold in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

10

9

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 (UNAUDITED)

NOTE 2     ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Advertising and Promotion Costs

Advertising and promotion costs, consisting primarily of samples and tradeshow costs, are expensed as incurred. Advertising and promotion costs are included in sales and marketingselling expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and amounted to approximately $53,000$14,000 and $62,000$42,000 for the three-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively; and $104,000$30,000 and $83,000$125,000 for the six-monthnine-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. 

Foreign Currency Transactions

The functional currency of the Company and each of its wholly ownedwholly-owned foreign subsidiaries is the U.S. dollar (except for Forward UK, which is the British Pound). Transactions denominated in foreign currencies may generate accounts receivable or payable balances that are fixed in terms of the amount of foreign currency that will be received or paid. Fluctuations in exchange rates between such foreign currency and the functional currency increase or decrease the expected amount of functional currency cash flows upon settlement of the transaction. These increases or decreases in expected functional currency cash flows are foreign currency transaction gains or losses that are included in “other income (expense), net” in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. For the three-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company recorded approximately $15,000$(26,000) and $23,000$11,000 in foreign currency transaction gains (losses), respectively. For the six-monthnine-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company recorded approximately $20,000$(46,000) and $21,000 in foreign currency transaction losses and $12,000 in foreign currency transaction gains (losses), respectively.  Such foreign currency transaction losses were primarily the result of Euro denominated sales to certain customers.

Comprehensive (Loss) IncomeLoss

We calculate comprehensive income (loss)loss as the total of our net income (loss) and all other changes in equity (other than transactions with owners), including foreign currency translation adjustments. Comprehensive loss was $1,549,454$(3,316,000) and $554,788$(6,378,000) for the three-monththree and nine-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2012, and 2011, respectively; and $3,061,718 and $537,313respectively. The Company did not have any material components of comprehensive loss, other than net loss, for the six-monththree and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.June 30, 2011.

Fair value of financial instruments

For certain of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, note receivable, accounts payable, and other accrued liabilities, the carrying amount approximates fair value due to the short-term maturities of these instruments.

Share-Based Payment Expense

The Company recognizes share-based equity compensation in its consolidated statements of operations at the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity-based compensation. The determination of grant-date fair value is estimated using athe Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which includes variables such as the expected volatility of the Company’s share price, the exercise behavior of its grantees, interest rates, and dividend yields. These variables are projected based on the Company’s historical data, experience, and other factors. Changes in any of these variables could result in material increases to the valuation of options granted in future periods and increases in the expense recognized for share-based payments. In the case of awards with multiple vesting periods, the Company has elected to use the graded vesting attribution method, which recognizes compensation cost on a straight-line basis over each separately vesting portion of the award as if the award was, in-substance, multiple awards. Refer to Note 6 Share-Based Compensation. In addition, the Company recognizes share-based compensation to non-employees (refer to Note 6) based upon the fair value, using the Black-Scholes pricing model, determined at the deemed measurement dates over the related contract service period.

11

10

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 (UNAUDITED)

NOTE 2     ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Recent accounting pronouncements

In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-12, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220):  Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05. ASU No. 2011-12, defers the specific requirement to present items that are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to net income separately within their respective components of net income and other comprehensive income as described by Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) - Presentation of Comprehensive Income (ASU N0. 2011-05).  The Company will continue to report any applicable reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income consistent with the presentation requirements in effect before ASU No. 2011-05.

NOTE 3     DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

On June 21, 2012, the Company determined to exit its global retail business and focus solely on growing its OEM business.  The decision to eliminate the retail division was primarily driven by the longer than estimated path to bring it to profitability and the strong top line growth and cost rationalizations in the OEM business.

Accordingly, the results of operations for the retail division have been recorded as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for all periods presented. During the three and nine-month period ended June 30, 2012, total discontinued operations include charges of $876,000 to write down inventory to net realizable value, $681,000 related to sales returns and price protection, and $150,000 to write-off forfeited advances made to suppliers.

Summarized operating results and assets and liabilities of discontinued operations are presented in the following tables:

12

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 (UNAUDITED)

NOTE 3     DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)

The Company expects to complete its exit of its retail business by September 30, 2012 and does not expect to have any continuing involvement in the retail business after this date. The Company anticipates an additional loss from discontinued operations of approximately $1.3 million, all of which the Company anticipates incurring in the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2012.

NOTE 4     NOTE RECEIVABLE

            On January 5, 2011, the Company entered into a loan agreement with Flash Ventures, Inc. (“Flash”), an unrelated party, to provide a credit facility of up to $1,000,000 that was originally due December 1, 2011.  Pursuant to the agreement Flash, executed an unsecured, unsubordinated term note in favor of the Company, bearing interest at 11% per annum on any unpaid principal, payable quarterly commencing March 31, 2011.   On January 6, 2011 and January 19, 2011, Flash drew $600,000 and $400,000, respectively, in funds under the note, leaving no further funding available.  Effective December 1, 2011, the terms of the loan were amended to, among other things, extend the maturity date to April 1, 2012 and provide the Company with a security interest and lien on all of Flash’s assets.  In connection with such amendment, Flash made a principal payment of $250,000 on December 1, 2011. Effective March 30, 2012, the terms of the loan were further amended to, among other things, extend the maturity date to June 1, 2012. In connection with such second amendment, Flash made a principal payment of $150,000 on March 30, 2012. On May 14, 2012, Flash paid the remaining principal balance of $600,000 and satisfied the loan in full. The Company recorded approximately $449,000 in sales to Flash under its customary terms of sale during the six-monthnine-month period ended March 31,June 30, 2011.

NOTE 4     PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS

            Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the following at:

NOTE 5     SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Anti-takeover Provisions

The Company is authorized to issue up to 4,000,000 shares of "blank check" preferred stock. The Board of Directors has the authority and discretion, without shareholder approval, to issue preferred stock in one or more series for any consideration it deems appropriate, and to fix the relative rights and preferences thereof including their redemption, dividend and conversion rights.

Stock Repurchase

In September 2002 and January 2004, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to an aggregate of 486,200 shares of outstanding common stock. Under those authorizations, as of March 31,June 30, 2012, the Company had repurchased an aggregate of 172,603 shares at a cost of approximately $403,000, but none during the three and six-monthnine-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2012 and 2011.

13

11

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 (UNAUDITED)

NOTE 5     SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (CONTINUED)

Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

Changes in shareholders’ equity for the six-monthnine-month period ended March 31,June 30, 2012 are summarized below:

NOTE 6     SHARE BASEDSHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

2011 Long TermLong-Term Incentive Plan

In March 2011 shareholders of the Company approved the 2011 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “2011 Plan”), which authorizes 850,000 shares of common stock for grants of various types of equity awards to officers, directors, employees, consultants, and independent contractors. Under the 2011 Plan, as of March 31,June 30, 2012, the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Compensation Committee”) has approved awards of stock options to purchase an aggregate of 825,000965,000 shares of common stock to certain of the Company’s executive officers and employees (590,000(730,000 shares), a consultant (160,000 shares), non-employee directors (70,000 shares), and to a non-employee executive officer (5,000).  Of these awards, 132,000365,500 shares were forfeited and reverted to, and are eligible for re-grant under, the 2011 Plan.  As of March 31,June 30, 2012, the total shares of common stock available for grants of equity awards under the 2011 Plan was 157,000.250,500. The prices at which equity awards may be granted and the exercise prices of stock options granted may not be less than the fair market value of the common stock as quoted at the close on the Nasdaq Stock Market on the grant date. The Compensation Committee administers the plan.  Options generally expire ten years after the date of grant and vest one year from the date of grant for non-employee directors, and, in the case of initial grants to officers and employees, vest over five years with 50%, 25% and 25% vesting on the third, fourth, and fifth anniversary of the grant date, respectively. Options granted under a consulting agreement in November 2011 expire three years after the grant date and vestvested equally over the term of the Consulting Agreement,consulting agreement, which concluded February 29, 2012. Refer to Note 10 – Commitments and Contingencies – Consulting Agreement.

14

12

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 (UNAUDITED)

NOTE 6     SHARE BASED COMPENSATION (CONTINUED)

2007 Equity Incentive Plan

The 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”), which was approved by shareholders of the Company in May 2007, and, as amended, in February 2010, authorizes an aggregate of 800,000 shares of common stock for grants of restricted common stock and stock options to officers, employees, and non-employee directors of the Company. Under the 2007 Plan, the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors approved awards of restricted common stock and stock options of 836,000, in the aggregate, to certain officers, employees and non-employee directors. Of these awards, 68,36678,366 shares were forfeited and reverted to, and are eligible for re-grant under, the 2007 Plan.  As of March 31,June 30, 2012, the total shares of common stock available for grants of equity awards under the 2007 Plan was 32,366.42,366. The prices at which restricted common stock may be granted and the exercise price of stock options granted may not be less than the fair market value of the common stock as quoted at the close on the Nasdaq Stock Market on the grant date. The Compensation Committee administers the 2007 Plan.  Options generally expire ten years after the date of grant, and in the case of non-employee directors, vest on the first anniversary of the date of grant. In the case of officers and employees, options either vest in equal amounts over three to five years or vest over five years with 50%, 25% and 25% vesting on the third, fourth, and fifth anniversary of the grant date, respectively. Restricted stock grants generally vest in equal proportions over three years.

1996 Stock Incentive Plan

The Company’s 1996 Stock Incentive Plan (the “1996 Plan”) expired in accordance with its terms in November 2006.  The exercise price of incentive options granted under the 1996 Plan to officers, employees, and non-employee directors of the Company was required by 1996 Plan provisions to be equal at least to the fair market value of the common stock at the date of grant. In general, options under this plan expire ten years after the date of grant and generally vest in equal proportions over three years.  Unexercised options granted  prior to 1996 Plan expiration remain outstanding until the earlier of exercise or option expiration. Under the 1996 Plan 30,000 fully vested common stock options are the only awards that remain outstanding and unexercised, all at exercise prices higher than the fair market value of the common stock at March 31,June 30, 2012.

NOTE 6     SHARE BASED COMPENSATION (CONTINUED)

Stock Option Awards

Under the 2011 and 2007 Plans, the Compensation Committee has approved awards of stock options to purchase an aggregate of 1,477,5001,617,500 shares of common stock to the Company’s current and certain former non-employee directors, to certain key employees, to current and certain former Company officers, and to a consultant, of which awards covering 45,00055,000 shares from the 2007 Plan and 132,000365,500 shares from the 2011 Plan of common stock were forfeited, with such shares reverting to the respective plans and eligible for grant. The exercise prices of the awards granted was, in each case equal, to the closing market value of the Company’s common stock on the Nasdaq Stock Market on the various grant dates.

The Company recognized a recovery of approximately $187,000$(81,000) and $43,000an expense of $116,000 of compensation expensein continuing operations for stock option awards in its consolidated statements of operations for the three-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively; and $320,000a recovery of approximately $(142,000) and $135,000an expense of $16,000 of compensation in discontinued operations for stock option awards in its consolidated statements of operations for the six-monththree-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

The Company recognized approximately $170,000 and $251,000 of compensation in continuing operations for stock option awards in its consolidated statements of operations for the nine-month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively; and a recovery of $(48,000) and an expense of $21,000 of compensation in discontinued operations for stock option awards in its consolidated statements of operations for the nine-month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

As of March 31,June 30, 2012, there was approximately $1,045,000$426,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to 874,000740,500 shares of unvested stock option awards granted under the 2007 and 2011 Plans, which is expected to be recognized over the remainder of the weighted average vesting period (extending to February 2017).

15

13

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 (UNAUDITED)

NOTE 6     SHARE BASED COMPENSATION (CONTINUED)

Stock Option Awards (continued)

The following table summarizes stock option activity under the 2011 Plan and 2007 Plan from September 30, 2011 through March 31,June 30, 2012 (there was no activity during such period in respect of 1996 Plan grants):

NOTE 6     SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION (CONTINUED)

Stock Option Awards (continued)

During the six-monthnine-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company granted 280,000420,000 and 685,000 stock options at weighted average grant date fair values of $0.91$0.96 and $2.09, respectively.

The fair value of each stock option on the date of grant was estimated using athe Black-Scholes option-pricing formula applying the following assumptions for each respective period:

16

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 (UNAUDITED)

The expected term represents the period over which the stock option awards are expected to be outstanding. The Company based the risk-free interest rate used in its assumptions on the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining term equivalent to the award’s expected term. The volatility factor used in the Company’s assumptions is based on the historical price of its stock over the most recent period commensurate with the expected term of the award. The Company historically has not paid any dividends on its common stock and had no intention to do so on the date the share-based awards were granted. Accordingly, the Company used a dividend yield of zero in its assumptions. The Company estimates the expected term, volatility and forfeitures of share-based awards based upon historical data. The Company adjusted its estimated forfeiture rate effective October 1, 2011 and recognized a recovery of approximately $46,000 during the three-month period ended December 31, 2011. No suchIn addition, the Company recognized a recovery was recognizedfor actual forfeitures in the amount of $305,000 during the three-month period ended March 31,June 30, 2012.

14

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 (UNAUDITED)

NOTE 6     SHARE BASED COMPENSATION (CONTINUED)

Restricted Stock Awards

Under the 2007 Plan, the Compensation Committee has approved and granted awards of 183,500 shares of restricted stock, in the aggregate, to certain key employees. Of these awards, 152,634 have vested and 23,366 shares of restricted stock were forfeited and reverted to, and are eligible for re-grant under, the 2007 Plan. No awards of restricted stock were made during the three and six monthnine-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2012.  Vesting of restricted stock awards is generally subject to a continued service condition with one-third of the awards vesting each year on the three successive anniversary dates of the grant date, typically commencing on the first such anniversary date.  The fair value of the awards granted was equal to the closing market value of the Company’s common stock as quoted on the Nasdaq Stock Market on the grant date. During the three-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company recognized approximately ($1,000)$1,000 and $3,000,$(15,000), respectively, of compensation expense (recovery) in continuing operations in its consolidated statements of operations related to restricted stock awards; and $3,000$4,000 and $13,000$(1,000) for the six-monthnine-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

NOTE 6     SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION (CONTINUED)

Restricted Stock Awards (Continued)

The following table summarizes restricted stock activity under the 2007 Plan from September 30, 2011, through March 31,June 30, 2012.

                As of March 31,June 30, 2012, there was approximately $3,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to 7,500 shares of unvested restricted stock awards (reflected in the table above) granted under the 2007 Plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over the remainder of the requisite service (vesting) periods (approximately 96 months). The total grant date fair value of restricted stock that vested during the six-monthnine-month period ended March 31,June 30, 2012 was approximately $35,000.

Warrants

    As of March 31,June 30, 2012, warrants to purchase 75,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.75 issued in fiscal 1999 were outstanding. By their terms these warrants expire 90 days after a registration statement registering common stock (other than pursuant to employee benefit plans) is declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission. As of March 31,June 30, 2012, no such registration statement has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

17

15

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 (UNAUDITED)

NOTE 7  INCOME TAXES

The Company’s provision (benefit) for income taxes from continuing operations consists of the following United States Federal and State, and foreign components:

The provision for income taxes of approximately $5,000 and $6,000 recorded in the three and six-month periods ended March 31, 2012 is primarily attributable to Forward UK. As of March 31, 2012, and September 30, 2011, the Company hasFor each period presented, there was no unrecognized income tax benefits.provision related to discontinued operations.

NOTE 7  INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED)

At March 31,June 30, 2012, the Company had available net operating loss carryforwards for U.S. Federal and state income tax purposes of approximately $4,837,000$6,342,000 and $5,782,000,$7,287,000, respectively, expiring through 2031, resulting in deferred tax assets in respect of U.S. Federal and state income taxes of approximately $1,645,000$2,156,000 and $167,000,$196,000, respectively. In addition, at March 31,June 30, 2012, the Company had available net operating loss carryforwards for foreign income tax purposes of approximately $1,663,000$3,805,000 resulting in a deferred tax asset of approximately $146,000,$335,000, expiring through 2017.  Total net deferred tax assets, before valuation allowances, was $2,284,000$2,739,000 and $1,381,000 at March 31,June 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011, respectively. As of March 31, 2012, the undistributedUndistributed earnings of the Company’s Swiss subsidiary of $317,000foreign subsidiaries are considered to be permanently invested; therefore, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S., no provision for U.S. Federal and state income taxes on thosewould result. As of June 30, 2012, there were no accumulated earnings has been provided.of any of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries.

As of March 31,June 30, 2012, as part of its periodic evaluation of the necessity to maintain a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets, and after consideration of all factors, both positive and negative (including, among others, projections of future taxable income, current year net operating loss carryforward utilization and the extent of the Company’s cumulative losses in recent years), the Company determined that, on a more likely than not basis, it would not be able to use its remaining deferred tax assets (except in respect of United States income taxes in the event the Company elects to effect the repatriation of certain foreign source income of its Swiss subsidiary, which income is currently considered to be permanently invested and for which no United States tax liability has been accrued). Accordingly, the Company has determined to maintain a full valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets; asassets. As of March 31,June 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011, the valuation allowances were approximately $2,284,000$2,739,000 and $1,381,000, respectively.  If the Company determines in a future reporting period that it will be able to use some or all of its deferred tax assets, the adjustment to reduce or eliminate the valuation allowance would reduce its tax expense and increase after-tax income. Changes in deferred tax assets and valuation allowance are reflected in the “Provision for Income Taxes”“Benefit from income taxes” line item of the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

18

16

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 (UNAUDITED)

NOTE 7  INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED)

As of March 31,June 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011, the Company has not accrued any interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions. It is the Company’s policy to recognize interest and/or penalties, if any, related to income tax matters in income tax expense in the statement of operations. For the periods presented in the accompanying statements of operations, no income tax related interest or penalties were assessed or recorded. All fiscal years prior to the fiscal year ended September 30, 20082009 are closed to Federal and State examination, except with respect to net operating losses generated in prior fiscal years.

NOTE 8     (LOSS) / INCOMELOSS PER SHARE

Basic per share data for each period presented is computed using the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each such period.  Diluted per share data is computed using the weighted-average number of common and dilutive common-equivalent shares outstanding during each period. Dilutive common-equivalent shares consist of shares that would be issued upon the exercise of stock options and warrants, computed using the treasury stock method. Diluted loss per share data for the three-month and six-monthnine-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2012 and 2011 excludes 1,328,000 and 39,429exclude 1,224,500 of outstanding common equivalent shares as inclusion of such shares would be anti-dilutive. Diluted loss per share data for the three-month and nine-month periods ended June 30, 2011 exclude 539,299 and 108,798, respectively, of outstanding common equivalent shares as inclusion of such shares would be anti-dilutive.

19

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 (UNAUDITED)

NOTE 9     OPERATING SEGMENT INFORMATION

In the first quarterAs of itsJune 30, 2012, fiscal year, the Company changed its internal reporting used by its senior management for evaluating segment performance and allocating resources. The new reporting disaggregates the Company’s operations into two divisions; OEM and Retail (including “Forward”-branded products), and represented a change in the Company’s operating segments under ASC 280, “Segment Reporting.” Duringduring its 2011 fiscal year, the Company reported and managed its businesscontinuing operations based on a single operating segment under ASC 280.

The OEM segment consists ofsegment: the design and distribution of custom carry and protective solutions, to OEM’s that either package the Company’s products as accessories “in box” together with their product offerings, or sell them through their retail distribution channels. The Company’s OEM productsprimarily for hand held electronic devices. Products designed and distributed by this segment include soft-sided carrying cases and other accessories for medical monitoring and diagnostic kits, bar code scanners,portable consumer electronics (includingelectronic devices (such as smartphones, tablets, personnel tablets and computers,, smartphones, notebooks, and GPS devices), and a variety of other portable electronic and non-electronic products (such as firearms, sporting, and other recreational products. The OEMproducts). This segment operates in geographic regions that include primarily APAC, the Americas, and EMEA.Europe. Geographic regions are defined by reference primarily to the location of the customer or its contract manufacturer.  The following table presents net sales related to these geographic segments:

The                                                                             (all amounts in thousands of dollars)

*Totals may not total due to rounding

On June 21, 2012, the Company determined to wind down its Retail segment, which commenced during the three-month period ended December 31, 2011, consists ofand focus solely on growing its OEM business.  The decision to eliminate the design, marketing,retail division was primarily driven by the longer than estimated path to bring it to profitability and distribution of casesthe strong top line growth and accessories for consumer electronics devices such as smartphones, tablets, portable computers and other consumer electronics products.cost rationalizations in the OEM business. The Company is currently developingexpects to complete its own lineexit of “Forward”-branded productsits retail business by September 30, 2012 and its capabilitydoes not expect to market and distribute such products to retail customershave any continuing involvement in the Americas an EMEA Region.retail business after this date.

17

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 (UNAUDITED)

NOTE 9     OPERATING SEGMENT INFORMATION (CONTINUED)

The following table presents net sales of each segment by geographical region:

*Totals may not total due to rounding

18

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 (UNAUDITED)

NOTE 10   COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Employment Agreements

On April 2, 2012, the Company appointed Robert Garrett Jr. and Brett Johnson as Co-Chief Executive Officers of the Company.  Mr. Johnson has served as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer since August 2010.  Mr. Garrett has served as a consultant to the Company pursuant to a consulting agreement (refer to “Consultancy Agreement” section below) since October 1, 2011. In connection with Mr. Garrett’s appointment as the Company’s Co-Chief Executive Officer, the Consulting Agreementconsulting agreement was terminated effective as of February 29, 2012. As of August 1, 2012, Forward and Co-CEO, Mr. Johnson, have opted not to renew Mr. Johnson’s employment contract, with his employment to end August 31, 2012.

Robert Garrett Employment Agreement

Under his employment agreement, Mr. Garrett is employed as the Company’s Co-Chief Executive Officer, effective as of March 1, 2012, at an annual salary of $250,000. In executing his employment agreement, Mr. Garrett received a signing bonus of $9,167. During Mr. Garrett’s first year of employment he shall receive a bonus not less than $50,000.  In addition, during each year of his employment, Mr. Garrett is eligible to receive an annual bonus at the discretion of the Compensation Committee in a combination of cash or equity based compensation. Mr. Garrett’s employment agreement also entitles him to awards of stock options to purchase an aggregate of 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the 2011 Long Term Incentive Plan.

20

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 (UNAUDITED)

NOTE 10   COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (CONTINUED)

Employment Agreements (Continued)

Mr. Garrett’s employment agreement provides for successive one-year renewal terms, unless either party provides written notice of its intention not to renew the agreement not later than 90 days prior to the end of the term (or renewal period). In the event of the termination of Mr. Garrett’s employment, depending on the circumstances, Mr. Garrett could be entitled to receive a severance payment which could be up to (12) twelve months of his salary, and under certain circumstances, the immediate vesting of any unvested options pursuant to applicable equity compensation plans, as well as any accrued discretionary bonus.

Mr. Garrett’s employment agreement binds him to customary non-competition and non-solicitation covenants of up to one year following the expiration of the employment term.

Brett Johnson Employment Agreement

Under his employment agreement, Mr. Johnson iswas employed as the Company’s Co-Chief Executive Officer, effective March 1, 2012, at an annual salary of $250,000.  During Mr. Johnson’s first year of employment, he iswas eligible to earn a bonus of up to $50,000, based on achievement of certain performance goals defined in his employment agreement. In addition, during each year of his employment, Mr. Johnson iswas eligible to receive an annual bonus at the discretion of the Compensation Committee in a combination of cash or equity based compensation.

Mr. Johnson’s employment agreement providesprovided for successive one-year renewal terms, unless either party provides written notice of its intention not to renew the agreement not later than 90 days prior to the end of the term (or renewal period). In the event of termination of Mr. Johnson’s employment, depending on the circumstances, Mr. Johnson could be entitled to receive a severance payment which could be up to (12) twelve months of his salary, and under certain circumstances the immediate vesting of any unvested options pursuant to applicable equity compensation plans, as well as any accrued discretionary bonus.

Mr. Johnson’s employment agreement binds him to customary non-competition and non-solicitation covenants of up to one year following the expiration of the employment term.

19

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 (UNAUDITED)

NOTE 10   COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (CONTINUED)

Employment Agreements (Continued)and Co-CEO, Mr. Johnson, have opted not to renew Mr. Johnson’s employment contract, with his employment to end August 31, 2012.

James McKenna Employment Agreement

James O. McKenna serves as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary pursuant to an Amended Employment Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2011 (the “Employment Agreement”), between the Company and Mr. McKenna.  The Employment Agreement provides for an annual salary of $225,000 and Mr. McKenna will be eligible to earn bonus compensation based on achievement of targets set by the Board’s Compensation Committee in respect of each fiscal year during the term.  Under the Employment Agreement, Mr. McKenna is entitled to reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket costs incurred in relocation to the Los Angeles area, and payment of a housing allowance of $7,500 per month, to be phased out over time.  The term of the Employment Agreement expires on December 31, 2012, with automatic renewal for successive terms of one year each.  Pursuant to the Employment Agreement, Mr. McKenna is entitled to a payment equal to one year of his salary as severance in the event of his termination “without cause” and termination for “good reason” (as such terms are defined in the Employment Agreement).  In addition, in case of termination for good reason or without cause, in either case within the first 36 months after relocation to the Los Angeles area, Mr. McKenna is entitled to reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket costs incurred in connection with relocation of his primary residence back to Florida.

Consultancy Agreement

On November 1, 2011, the Company entered into an agreement with RGJR Capital Partners LLC (“RGJR”) to provide Robert Garrett, Jr. as a consultant for a term of up to six months to assist management in implementation of its growth strategy pursuant to a letter agreement, effective as of October 1, 2011. Under the RGJR agreement, Mr. Garrett received a consulting fee of $30,000 per month and was awarded options to purchase up to 160,000 shares of common stock of the Company pursuant to the 2011 Long Term Incentive Plan. In connection with Mr. Garrett’s appointment as the Company’s Co-Chief Executive Officer (refer to “Employment Agreements” section above), the Consulting Agreement was terminated effective as of February 29, 2012.

21

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 (UNAUDITED)

NOTE 10   COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (CONTINUED)

Letters of Intent

Waterproof Case License

In September 2011, the Company entered into a Letter of Intent with a Florida corporation (“FloridaCo”) that has invented a patent pending waterproof electronics case. Under the Letter of Intent, the Company will be granted the exclusive worldwide license to manufacture, develop, distribute, and otherwise use the waterproof case, subject to maintaining certain minimum monthly sales levels, in exchange for making certain royalty payments to FloridaCo. In addition, the Company agreed to make four quarterly payments of advance royalties to FloridaCo, in the amount of $25,000 each, commencing December 1, 2011.  Such advance royalty payments are non-refundable and interest free.  However, a portion of these payments may be used by the Company to offset its performance-based royalty obligations to FloridaCo until all such advance royalties have been fully recouped by the Company. As of the date of this report, the Company had paid $50,000 of such advance royalties to FloridaCo, which are included in “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2012.

20

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 (UNAUDITED)

NOTE 10   COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (CONTINUED)

Letters of Intent (continued)

Folding Keyboard License

In January 2012, the Company entered into a Letter of Intent with a Delaware corporation (“DelawareCo”) that has invented a patent pending, folding, Bluetooth keyboard (the “Folding Keyboard”). Under the Letter of Intent, the Company would have been granted the exclusive worldwide license to manufacture, develop, distribute, and otherwise use the Folding Keyboard in exchange for making certain royalty payments to DelawareCo based on the Company’s sales of the Folding Keyboard over the term of the license agreement. In addition, the Company agreed to pay DelawareCo $100,000 of advance royalties in the event DelawareCo raises $100,000 of capital for the launch of the Folding Keyboard. On March 24,July 2012, upon mutual agreement, the Company withdrew its Letter of Intent with DelawareCo., and asFloridaCo. As of the date of such date, notermination, the Company had paid FloridaCo $50,000 of advance royalties, have been paid to DelawareCo.which are non-refundable and interest free. The Company included these royalty payments in its “selling expenses” in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations during the three and nine-month period ended June 30, 2012.

Guarantee Obligation

In February 2010, Forward Switzerland and its European logistics provider (freight forwarding and customs agent) entered into a Representation Agreement whereby, among other things, the European logistics provider agreed to act as such subsidiary's Fiscal representative in The Netherlands for the purpose of providing services in connection with any value added tax matters. As part of this agreement, which succeeds a substantially similar agreement (except as to the amount and term of the undertaking) between the parties that expired March 31,June 30, 2009, the subsidiary agreed to provide an undertaking (in the form of a bank letter of guarantee) to the logistics provider with respect to any value added tax liability arising in The Netherlands that the logistics provider is required to pay to Dutch tax authorities on the subsidiary's behalf. As of February 1, 2010, such subsidiary entered into a guarantee agreement with a Swiss bank relating to the repayment of any amount up to €75,000 (equal to approximately $100,000 as of March 31,June 30, 2012) paid by such bank to the logistics provider in order to satisfy such undertaking pursuant to the bank letter of guarantee.  The subsidiary would be required to perform under the guarantee agreement only in the event that: (i) a value added tax liability is imposed on the Company's sales in The Netherlands, (ii) the logistics provider asserts that it has been called upon in its capacity as surety by the Dutch Receiver of Taxes to pay such taxes, (iii) the subsidiary or the Company on its behalf fails or refuses to remit the amount of value added tax due to the logistics provider upon its demand, and (iv) the logistics provider makes a drawing under the bank letter of guarantee. Under the Representation Agreement the subsidiary agreed that the letter of guarantee would remain available for drawing for three years following the date that its relationship terminates with the logistics provider to satisfy any value added tax liability arising prior to expiration of the Representation Agreement but asserted by The Netherlands after expiration. The initial term of the bank letter of guarantee expired February 28, 2011, but was renewed for one year and may be renewedrenews automatically for one-year periods until February 28, 2014, unless the subsidiary provides the Swiss bank with written notice of termination at least 60 days prior to the renewal date. It is the intent of the subsidiary and the logistics provider that the bank letter of guarantee amount be adjusted annually. In consideration of the issuance of the letter of guarantee, the subsidiary has granted the Swiss bank a security interest on all of the subsidiary’s assets on deposit with, held by, or credited to the subsidiary’s accounts with, the Swiss bank (approximately $300,000 at March 31,June 30, 2012). As of March 31,June 30, 2012, the Company had not incurred a liability in connection with this guarantee.

22

21

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 (UNAUDITED)

NOTE 10   COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (CONTINUED)

Buying Agency and Supply Agreement

On March 12, 2012, the Company, entered into a Buying Agency and Supply Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Seaton Global Corporation, a British Virgin Islands corporation (“SGC”), dated as of March 7, 2012.  The Agreement provides that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth therein, SGC shall act as the Company’s exclusive buying agent and supplier of Products (as defined in the Agreement) in the Asia Pacific region.  The Company shall purchase products at SGC’s cost, and shall pay a service fee on the net purchase price.  The Agreement shall terminate on March 11, 2014, subject to renewal.  Terence Wise, a director of the Company, is a principal of SGC. During the three and six-monthnine-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2012, the Company recorded $70,000$270,000 and $332,000 of SGC service fees, respectively, which are included as a component of costs of goods sold in continuing operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. As a result of this agreement, the Company is engaged in shutting down its legacy Hong Kong sourcing, logistics and quality assurance operations and expects to complete such activities by September 30, 2012.

NOTE 11   BINDING MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

In August 2011, the Company entered into a binding Memorandum of Understanding (“(the “Prior MOU”) with G-Form LLC (“G-Form”), a manufacturer of consumer and athletic products incorporating proprietary extreme protective technology.  Under the Prior MOU, the Company iswas granted the exclusive right to use G-Form’s protective technology in the Company’s designated territory, subject to meeting certain minimum annual sales levels (or at the Company’s option, the making of royalty payments at corresponding levels) commencing with the twelve-month period after shipment of the first Forward-branded licensed product that usesused this technology, with the minimum levels increasing in the subsequent second and third twelve-month periods.  After the first twelve-month period, the Company may terminate the MOU by providing six months notice, provided that the Company has paid all royalties and other charges incurred.  The Agreement may be terminated by G-Form if there is an uncorrected, material breach by the Company of the terms of the Agreement.

As of September 30, 2011, the Company had paid G-Form a $490,000 non-refundable advance against the first year’s royalties to be offset by cancellation of the $500,000 of loans made by the Company to G-Form in its capacity as a prospective joint venture partner. This amount increased to $500,000 as of March 31,30, 2012. 

On June 21, 2012, in connection with the Company’s determination to exit its global retail business, the Company entered into a second Memorandum of Understanding (the “New MOU”) with G-Form.  The $500,000New MOU contemplates, among other things, (i) that G-Form will repurchase from the Company certain G-Form inventory held by the Company, (ii) that the Company will assist G-Form on a short-term basis with certain operational and sales functions previously performed by Forward for G-Form products, (iii) that G-Form may offer employment to certain of Forward’s non-US based employees, (iv) that the Company and G-Form have agreed to work together to distribute the Company’s remaining inventory of products and to transition the Company’s distribution channels relating to G-Form products to G-Form, and (v) the Company and G-Form have agreed on the settlement of advanced royalties ispaid under the Prior MOU.  Pursuant to the New MOU, the Prior MOU was terminated. The remaining balance of the advanced royalties as of June 30, 2012 was approximately $116,000 and included in “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” on“Current assets of discontinued operations” in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2012. As of March 31, 2012, there have been no sales of Forward-branded licensed product. The MOU is a binding agreement but the parties have agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to replace the MOU with a mutually agreeable long-form license agreement reflecting the terms of the MOU and other customary terms and conditions.sheets.

23

22

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 (UNAUDITED)

NOTE 12 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Targus Group International, Inc., et al. v., Forward Industries, Johnson, et al.

On September 19, 2011, the Company, Brett Johnson (our President and Chief Executive Officer), and one of our employees were named in a Complaint filed in Orange County Superior Court by Targus Group International, Inc. and two of its affiliates.  The Complaint alleged a claim for breach of contract against Mr. Johnson.  The Complaint further alleged a "breach“breach of fiduciary duty/duty of loyalty"loyalty” against the employee, and it asserted claims against Mr. Johnson and the Company for allegedly aiding and abetting that alleged breach.  The Complaint also asserted a cause of action against all Defendants for unfair competition.  An Amended Complaint was filed on October 11, 2011.  In addition to the claims asserted in the original Complaint, the Amended Complaint added an additional Targus affiliate as a plaintiff and named an additional employee of the Company as a defendant.  The Amended Complaint asserted a claim against that employee for breach of contract and for "breach“breach of fiduciary duty/duty of loyalty," ” and it added new claims against the Company and Mr. Johnson for allegedly interfering with that employee'semployee’s contract and for allegedly aiding and abetting his breach of duty.  The claim for unfair competition in the Amended Complaint relies on these new allegations as well.  All of the claims asserted in this action arise out of the decisions of former employees of one or more of the plaintiffs to accept offers of employment with the Company.  The amount of damages sought is not specified.  On November 11, 2011, the Company, Brett Johnson, and James Berberian filed a demurrer with respect to certain of the claims asserted in the Amended Complaint.  On January 30, 2012, the district court sustained the demurrer in part and ruled that Plaintiffs had not pled a valid cause of action against Mr. Johnson with respect to its claim against him for breach of contract.  The court permitted Plaintiffs to amend this defective claim and on February 10, 2012, Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Complaint. On March 12, 2012, Mr. Johnson filed a demurrer to the breach of contract claim that was re-pled against him in the Second Amended Complaint.  A hearing onThe court overruled Mr. Johnson’s demurrer is scheduled for May 22,in an order dated June 11, 2012.  The Company believes it has substantial defenses to these claims and intends to vigorously defend the action. The Company has not recorded a loss provision for these complaints as of March 31,June 30, 2012.

Other Litigation

            From time to time, the Company may become a party to other legal actions or proceedings in the ordinary course of its business.  As of March 31,June 30, 2012, there were no such actions or proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, that, if decided adversely to the Company’s interests, the Company believes would be material to its business.

24

23