UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

T QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 or

 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31,JUNE 30, 2009    or

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number:  333-108057

COMMONWEALTH INCOME & GROWTH FUND V
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Pennsylvania65-1189593
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

Brandywine Bldg. One, Suite 200
2 Christy Drive
Chadds Ford, PA 19317
(Address, including zip code, of principal executive offices)

(610) 594-9600
(Registrant’s telephone number including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (i) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (ii) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days:
YES  T      NO  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).YES  ¨      NO  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of "accelerated filer, “large accelerated filer" and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ¨
Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer ¨
Smaller reporting company T
 (Do not check if a smaller reporting company.) 
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).      YES  ¨ NO T

 
 

1


FORM 10-Q
MARCH 31,JUNE 30, 2009

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 PART I 
Item 1.Financial Statements3
Item 2.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations1314
Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk1718
Item 4T.Controls and Procedures1718
 PART II 
Item 1.Legal Proceedings1718
7ItemItem 1 A.Risk Factors1819
Item 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds1819
Item 3.Defaults Upon Senior Securities19
Item 4.Submission of Matters to a Vote of Securities Holders19
Item 5.Other Information19
Item 6.Exhibits19
   


2


Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements

Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund VCommonwealth Income & Growth Fund V Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund V 
Condensed Balance SheetsCondensed Balance Sheets Condensed Balance Sheets 
         
 March, 31  December 31,  June 30,  December 31, 
 2009  2008  2009  2008 
 (unaudited)     (unaudited)    
Assets            
            
Cash $1,922,078  $3,053,703  $140,025  $3,053,703 
Lease income receivable, net of reserve of $115,617 and $128,617 at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively  467,391   320,541 
Accounts receivable, GP  18,516   18,516 
Accounts receivable, CCC  148,450   394,435 
Lease income receivable, net of reserve of $128,617 at June 30, 2009 and $115,617 and December 31, 2008, respectively  456,387   320,541 
Accounts receivable, General Partner  -   18,516 
Accounts receivable, Commonwealth Capital Corp.  93,210   394,435 
Accounts receivable, affiliated limited partnerships  4,203   300   1,563   300 
Prepaid expenses  16,034   6,422   9,629   6,422 
  2,576,672   3,793,917   700,814   3,793,917 
                
Computer equipment, at cost  22,356,818   21,267,794   24,208,709   21,267,794 
Accumulated depreciation  (13,411,917)  (12,060,593)  (14,759,681)  (12,060,593)
  8,944,901   9,207,201   9,449,028   9,207,201 
                
Equipment acquisition costs and deferred expenses, net of accumulated amortization of $482,272 and $449,553 at
March 31, 2009 and at December 31, 2008, respectively
  232,091   247,773 
Equipment acquisition costs and deferred expenses, net of accumulated amortization of $447,723 and
$518,860 at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively
  255,503   247,773 
Prepaid acquisition Fees  135,214   180,205   55,893   180,205 
  367,305   427,978 
          311,396   427,978 
                
Total Assets $11,888,878   13,429,096  $10,461,238   13,429,096 
                
                
Liabilities and Partners' Capital                
                
Liabilities                
Accounts payable $86,819  $357,751  $140,686  $357,751 
Accounts payable, General Partner  31,763   41,112   27,709   41,112 
Accounts payable, Commonwealth Capital Corp.  12,676   35,387   -   35,387 
Other accrued expenses  48,361   11,302   18,895   11,302 
Unearned lease income  322,837   142,203   287,136   142,203 
Notes payable  1,116,057   1,551,477   815,356   1,551,477 
Total Liabilities  1,618,513   2,139,232   1,289,782   2,139,232 
                
Partners' Capital                
General partner  1,000   1,000   1,000   1,000 
Limited partners  10,269,365   11,288,864   9,170,456   11,288,864 
Total Partners' Capital  10,270,365   11,289,864   9,171,456   11,289,864 
                
        
Total Liabilities and Partners' Capital $11,888,878  $13,429,096  $10,461,238  $13,429,096 

see accompanying notes to condensed financial statements

3


Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund VCommonwealth Income & Growth Fund V Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund V 
Condensed Statements of OperationsCondensed Statements of Operations Condensed Statements of Operations 
      
      
(unaudited)(unaudited) 
                  
 Three Months Ended  Three Months Ended             
 March 31,  March 31,  Three Months Ended  Six Months Ended 
 2009  2008  June 30,  June 30, 
 (unaudited)  (unaudited)  2009  2008  2009  2008 
Revenue                  
Lease $1,527,745  $1,827,678  $1,458,570  $1,739,599  $2,986,315  $3,567,278 
Interest and other  20,908   28,670   12,418   21,125   33,326   49,795 
Gain on sale of computer equipment  1,486   -   17,674   87,240   19,160   82,274 
Total Revenue  1,550,139   1,856,348   1,488,662   1,847,964   3,038,801   3,699,347 
                        
Expenses                        
Operating, excluding depreciation  374,661   373,474   359,879   422,466   734,540   795,940 
Equipment management fee, General Partner  76,992   86,305   72,324   92,059   149,316   178,364 
Interest  21,889   43,294   15,991   39,201   37,880   82,495 
Depreciation  1,377,584   1,363,141   1,454,353   1,395,027   2,831,937   2,758,168 
Amortization of equipment acquisition costs and deferred expenses  60,673   77,779   55,909   78,992   116,582   156,772 
Bad debt expense  13,000   -   -   -   13,000   - 
Loss on sale of computer equipment  -   4,966 
Total expenses  1,924,799   1,948,959   1,958,456   2,027,745   3,883,255   3,971,739 
                        
Net (loss) $(374,660) $(92,611) $(469,794) $(179,781) $(844,454) $(272,392)
                        
Net (loss) allocated to limited partners $(380,887) $(98,861) $(476,010) $(186,031) $(856,896) $(284,892)
                        
Net (loss) per equivalent limited partnership unit $(0.31) $(0.08) $(0.38) $(0.15) $(0.69) $(0.23)
                        
Weighted average number of equivalent limited partnership units outstanding during the period  1,245,500   1,249,951   1,243,852   1,248,951   1,244,352   1,248,951 

see accompanying notes to condensed financial statements



4




Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund VCommonwealth Income & Growth Fund V Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund V
Condensed Statements of Partners' CapitalCondensed Statements of Partners' Capital Condensed Statements of Partners' Capital
For the three months ended March 31, 2009 
For the six months ended June 30, 2009For the six months ended June 30, 2009
(unaudited)(unaudited) (unaudited)
 
 
General
Partner Units
  
Limited
Partner Units
  General Partner  Limited Partner  Total  General Partner Units Limited Partner Units General Partner Limited Partner Total
Balance, January 1, 2009  50   1,245,852  $1,000  $11,288,864  $11,289,864                           50               1,245,852 $                  1,000 $       11,288,864 $      11,289,864
Net Income (loss)  -   -   6,227   (380,887)  (374,660)                             -                                -                     12,442                (856,896)             (844,454)
Redemptions  -   (2,000)  -   (22,249)  (22,249)                             -                       (2,648)                             -                  (29,654)                (29,654)
Distributions  -   -   (6,227)  (616,363)  (622,589)                             -                                -                   (12,442)             (1,231,858)          (1,244,300)
Balance, March 31, 2009  50   1,243,852  $1,000  $10,269,365  $10,270,365 
Balance, June 30, 200950               1,243,204 $                  1,000 $         9,170,456 $        9,171,456

see accompanying notes to condensed financial statements


5



Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund V 
Condensed Statements of Cash Flow 
(unaudited) 
       
  Six Months ended  Six Months ended 
  June 30,  June 30, 
  2009  2008 
       
Net cash provided by operating activities $1,414,880  $1,019,161 
         
Investing activities:        
Capital Expenditures  (3,107,805)  (583,599)
Prepaid acquisition fees  -   (14,039)
Net proceeds from the sale of computer equipment  53,201   507,602 
Net cash (used in) investing activities  (3,054,604)  (90,036)
         
Financing activities:        
Redemptions  (29,654)  (15,192)
Distributions to partners  (1,244,300)  (1,249,576)
Debt placement fee paid to General Partner  -   (2,916)
Net cash (used in) financing activities  (1,273,954)  (1,267,684)
         
Net (decrease) in cash  (2,913,678)  (338,559)
Cash beginning of period  3,053,703   4,114,953 
         
Cash end of period $140,025  $3,776,394 
Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund V 
Condensed Statements of Cash Flow 
       
  Three Months ended  Three Months ended 
  March 31,  March 31, 
  2009  2008 
  (unaudited)  (unaudited) 
       
Net cash provided by operating activities $627,014  $734,134 
         
Investing activities:        
Capital Expenditures  (1,124,779)  (512,509)
Prepaid acquisition fees  44,991   20,500 
Net proceeds from the sale of computer equipment  10,979   4,856 
Equipment acquisition fees, General Partner  (44,991)  (20,500)
Net cash (used in) investing activities  (1,113,800)  (507,653)
         
Financing activities:        
Redemptions  (22,249)  - 
Distributions to partners  (622,590)  (624,974)
Net cash (used in) financing activities  (644,839)  (624,974)
         
Net (decrease) in cash  (1,131,625)  (398,493)
Cash beginning of period  3,053,703   4,114,953 
         
Cash end of period $1,922,078  $3,716,460 

see accompanying notes to condensed financial statements

6

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Business

Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund V (the “Partnership”) is a limited partnership organized in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania on May 19, 2003.  The Partnership offered for sale up to 1,250,000 units of the limited partnership at the purchase price of $20 per unit (the “Offering”).  The Partnership reached the minimum amount in escrow and commenced operations on March 14, 2005.  As of February 24, 2006, the Partnership was fully subscribed.

The Partnership used the proceeds of the Offering to acquire, own and lease various types of information technology (I.T.) equipment and other similar capital equipment, which is leased primarily to U.S. corporations and institutions.  Commonwealth Capital Corp. (“CCC”), on behalf of the Partnership and other affiliated partnerships, acquires computer equipment subject to associated debt obligations and lease agreements and allocates a participation in the cost, debt and lease revenue to the various partnerships based on certain risk factors.

The Partnership’s General Partner is Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund, Inc. (the “General Partner”), a Pennsylvania corporation which is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of CCC.  CCC is a member of the Investment Program Association (IPA), Financial Planning Association (FPA), and the Equipment Leasing and Finance Association (ELFA).  Approximately ten years after the commencement of operations, the Partnership intends to sell or otherwise dispose of all of its computer equipment, make final distributions to partners and to dissolve.  Unless sooner terminated, the Partnership will continue until December 31, 2015.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In  September 2006,June 2009, the FASB issued Statement of FinancialNo. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards 157, “Fair Value Measurements”Codification (Codification) and the Hierarchy of GAAP (“SFAS 157”168”), which provides guidance on measuringreplaces SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of GAAP and establishes the fair valueCodification as the single source of assets and liabilities. SFAS 157 applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit assets or liabilitiesauthoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB to be measured at fair valueapplied by nongovernmental entities.  SEC rules and interpretive releases are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants.  SFAS 168 modifies the GAAP hierarchy to include only two levels of GAAP: authoritative and nonauthoritative.  SFAS 168 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009.  As SFAS 168 is not intended to change or alter existing GAAP, it will not impact the Partnership’s condensed financial statements.  The Partnership will adjust historical GAAP references in its third quarter 2009 Form 10-Q to reflect accounting guidance references included in the Codification.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (“SFAS 167”), which amended certain requirements of FIN 46R to improve financial reporting disclosure by companies involved with variable interest entities and to provide more relevant and reliable information to users of financial statements. SFAS 167 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter, with early adoption prohibited. The Partnership is currently evaluating the potential impact of the adoption of SFAS 167 on its condensed financial statements.

7
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (“SFAS 166”), which was issued to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial statements about (1) a transfer of its financial assets, (2) the effects of such a transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows, and (3) a reporting entity’s continuing involvement, if any, in the transferred financial assets. SFAS 166 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter, with early adoption prohibited. The Partnership is currently evaluating the potential impact of the adoption of SFAS 166, but does not expandbelieve that it will have a material impact on its financial statements.

In May 2009, the use of fair value to any new circumstances. This standard also requires additionalFASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events (“SFAS 165”), which sets forth principles and requirements for subsequent events, specifically (1) the period during which management should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition and disclosure, (2) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date, and (3) the disclosures in both annualthat an entity should make about events and quarterly reports.  As of January 1, 2008transactions occurring after the balance sheet date. SFAS 165 is effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Partnership adopted SFAS No. 157 for all financial assets.  Adoption165 during the second quarter of this pronouncement did not impact the 2008 financial statements of the Partnership.   In February 2008,  FASB issued FSP FAS 157-2 to provide a one-year deferral of the effective date of Statement 157 for nonfinancial assets2009 and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed in financial statements at fair value on a recurring basis (that is, at least annually).   The adoption of SFAS 157-2 on January 1, 2009it did not have a material impact on the Partnership’s condensed financial statements.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (“FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2”).  This FSP provides a framework to perform an other-than-temporary impairment analysis, in compliance with GAAP, which determines whether the holder of an investment in a debt or equity security, for which changes in fair value are not regularly recognized in earnings, should recognize a loss in earnings when the investment is impaired.  Additionally this FSP amends the other-than-temporary impairment guidance for debt securities to make the guidance more operational and to improve the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity securities in the financial statements.   FAS 115-2 is effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009.  The Partnership adopted FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 in the quarter ended June 30, 2009.  The adoption did not have a material impact on the Partnership’s condensed financial statements.

In April 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Staff Position (FSP) FAS No. 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1), which amends Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, to require disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods, as well as annual reporting periods. FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 are effective for all interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009 and shall be applied prospectively.  The Partnership adopted FSP 107-1 in the second quarter of 2009. Except for the disclosure requirements, the adoption of FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1 did not have a material impact on the Partnership’s condensed financial statements.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly (“FAS 157-4”).  This FSP provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with FASB Statement No. 157 when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased and provides guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly.  FAS 157-4 is effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009.  The Partnership adopted FAS 157-4 in the quarter ended June 30, 2009.  The adoption did not have a material impact on the Partnership’s condensed financial statements.

In January 2009, FASB issued FSP EITF 99-20-1, “Amendments to the Impairment Guidance of EITF Issue No. 99-20 (“FSP EITF 99-20-1”). FSP EITF 99-20-1 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2008. Retroactive application is not permitted. The adoption of FSP EITF 99-20-1 did not have a significant impact on the Partnership’s financial position or results of operations.

7
In April 2009, theFebruary 2008,  FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 107-1 (“FSP FAS 107-1”)157-2 to provide a one-year deferral of the effective date of Statement 157 for nonfinancial assets and APB 28-1 (“APB 28-1”), which amends FASB Statement No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments and APB Opinion NO. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, to require disclosures about thenonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed in financial statements at fair value on a recurring basis (that is, at least annually).   The Partnership adopted the provisions of financial instruments for interim reporting periods. FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 will be effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15,157-2 in the quarter ended March 31, 2009.  The adoption of this staff position isrequired provisions did not expected to have a material impact on the Partnership’s condensed financial position or results of operationstatements.

8
Basis of Presentation

The financial information presented as of any date other than December 31, 2008 has been prepared from the books and records without audit.  Financial information as of December 31, 2008 has been derived from the audited financial statements of the Partnership, but does not include all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles to be included in audited financial statements.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial information for the periods indicated, have been included.  For further information regarding the Partnership’s accounting policies, refer to the financial statements and related notes included in the Partnership’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.  Operating results for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of financial results that may be expected for the full year ended December 31, 2009.

Pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 165 (“FASB No. 165”), subsequent events have been evaluated through August 12, 2009, the date these financial statements were available to be issued, and there were no subsequent events to be reported.

Disclosure of Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Effective April 2009, the Partnership has adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Staff Position SFAS 107-1 and Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (FSP SFAS 107-1 and APB 28-1). The FSP amends SFAS 107 to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in both interim and annual financial statements. This FSP also amends APB 28 to require those disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting periods.

Estimated fair value was determined by management using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies.  However, judgment was necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated fair value.  The partnership holds no financial instruments, except notes payable. Cash, receivables, accounts payable, and accrued expenses and other liabilities are carried at amounts which reasonably approximate their fair values as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.

The Partnership’s long-term debt consists of notes payable, which are secured by specific computer equipment and are nonrecourse liabilities of the Partnership. The estimated fair value of this debt at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 approximates the carrying value of these instruments, due to the interest rates approximating current market values.

Disclosure about fair value of financial instruments is based on pertinent information available to management as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. 

9
Long-Lived Assets

The Partnership evaluates its long-lived assets when events or circumstances indicate that the value of the asset may not be recoverable.  The Partnership determines whether an impairment exists by estimating the undiscounted cash flows to be generated by each asset.  If the estimated undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value of the asset, then an impairment exists.  The amount of the impairment is determined based on the difference between the carrying value and the fair value.  Fair value is determined based on estimated discounted cash flows to be generated by the asset.  The Partnership determined that no impairment existed at March 31, 2009 andJune 30, 2009.  The Partnership determined that impairment in the amount of approximately $15,000 existed as of June 30, 2008.

Depreciation on computer equipment for financial statement purposes is based on the straight-line method estimated generally over useful lives of three to four years.

Reimbursable Expenses

Reimbursable expenses, which are charged to the Partnership by CCC in connection with the administration and operation of the Partnership, are allocated to the Partnership based upon several factors including, but not limited to, the number of investors, compliance issues, and the number of existing leases.  For example, if the Partnership has more investors than another program sponsored by CCC, then higher amounts of expenses related to investor services, mailing and printing costs will be allocated to the Partnership.  Also, while a Partnership is in its offering stage, higher compliance costs are allocated to it than to a program not in its offering stage, as compliance resources are utilized to review incoming investor suitability and proper documentation.  Finally, lease related expenses, such as due diligence, correspondence, collection efforts and analysis staff costs, increase as programs purchase more leases, and decrease as leases terminate and equipment is sold. All of these factors contribute to CCC’s determination as to the amount of expenses to allocate to the Partnership or to other sponsored programs.  For the Partnership, all reimbursable expenses are expensed as they are incurred.

8
Cash

At March 31,June 30, 2009, cash was held in two accounts maintained at one financial institution. The accounts were, in the aggregate, federally insured for up to $250,000.  At March 31,June 30, 2009, the total cash balance was as follows:

At March 31, 2009   
Total balance Bank $2,442,071 
FDIC insurable limit $250,000 
Exceeded FDIC limit by $2,192,071 
     
At June 30, 2009   
Total bank balance $651,954 
FDIC insurable limit $250,000 
Uninsured amount $401,954 

The Partnership can mitigatemitigates this risk by depositing funds with more than one institution and by only depositing funds with major financial institutions. The Partnership has not experienced any losses in such accounts, and believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk. The amount in such accounts will fluctuate throughout 2009 due to many factors, including the pace of additional revenues, equipment acquisitions and distributions. 

Net Income (Loss) Per Equivalent Limited Partnership Unit

The net income (loss) per equivalent limited partnership unit is computed based upon net income (loss) allocated to the limited partners and the weighted average number of equivalent units outstanding during the period.

Reclassification

Certain prior amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. The net results of the reclassifications did not have an impact on the Partnership’s previously reported financial position, cash flows, or results of operations.

10
3. Computer Equipment

The Partnership is the lessor of equipment under operating leases with periods generally ranging from 12 to 48 months.  In general, associated costs such as repairs and maintenance, insurance and property taxes are paid by the lessee.

Through March 31,June 30, 2009, the Partnership has only entered into operating leases.  Lease revenue is recognized on the monthly straight-line basis which is generally in accordance with the terms of the operating lease agreements.  The company’s leases do not contain any step-rent provisions or escalation clauses nor are lease revenues adjusted based on any index.

9
Remarketing fees are paid to the leasing companies from which the Partnership purchases leases.  These are fees that are earned by the leasing companies when the initial terms of the lease have been met and the equipment is re-leased or sold.  The General Partner believes that this strategy adds value since it entices the leasing company to "stay with the lease" for potential extensions, remarketing or sale of equipment.  This strategy potentially minimizes any conflicts the leasing company may have with a potential new lease and will potentially assist in maximizing overall portfolio performance.  The remarketing fee is tied into lease performance thresholds and is factored in the negotiation of the fee.  Remarketing fees incurred in connection with lease extensions are accounted for as operating costs.  Remarketing fees incurred in connection with the sale of computer equipment are included in our gain or loss calculations.  For the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Partnership incurred remarketing fees of approximately $7,000$33,000 and $2,600,$5,000, respectively. For the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2009 the Partnership paid approximately $5,000$25,000 in such fees.  No such fees were paid for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2008.

The Partnership’s share of the computer equipment in which it participates with other partnerships at March 31,June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was approximately $9,920,000$10,328,000 and $9,480,000, respectively, whichand is included in the Partnership’s fixed assets on its balance sheet.  The total cost of the equipment shared by the Partnership with other partnerships at March 31,June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was approximately $25,068,000$25,884,000 and $23,272,000, respectively.  The Partnership’s share of the outstanding debt associated with this equipment at March 31,June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was $923,000$681,000 and $1,183,000, respectively.  The total outstanding debt related to the equipment shared by the Partnership at March 31,June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was approximately $2,728,000$2,142,000 and $3,349,000, respectively.

The following is a schedule of future minimum rentals on noncancellable operating leases at March 31,June 30, 2009:

  Amount 
    
Six months ending December 31, 2009 $2,016,502 
Year ended December 31, 2010  1,992,898 
Year ended December 31, 2011  1,189,000 
Year ended December 31, 2012  303,886 
  $5,502,286 
11
  Amount 
    
Nine months ended December 31, 2009 $3,746,203 
Year ended December 31, 2010  1,330,970 
Year ended December 31, 2011  569,544 
Year ended December 31, 2012  112,855 
  $5,759,572 
     

4. Related Party Transactions

Receivables/Payables

As of March 31,June 30, 2009, the Partnership’s related party receivables and payables are short term, unsecured, and non-interest bearing.
10

Reimbursable Expenses

See “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies- Reimbursable Expenses,” above. During the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Partnership recorded approximately $341,000$691,000 and $376,000,$750,000, respectively, for reimbursement of expenses to the General Partner.

Equipment Acquisition Fee

The General Partner is entitled to be paid an equipment acquisition fee of 4% of the purchase price of each item of equipment purchased as compensation for the negotiation of the acquisition of the equipment and lease thereof or sale under a conditional sales contract.  For the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2009 and 2008, equipment acquisition fees of approximately $45,000$124,000 and $20,000,$35,000, respectively, were earned.  TheAt June 30, 2009, the remaining balance ofwas approximately $135,000$56,000 and will be earned in future periods.

Debt Placement Fee

As compensation for arranging term debt to finance the acquisition of equipment by the Partnership, the General Partner is paid a fee equal to 1% of such indebtedness; provided, however, that such fee shall be reduced to the extent the Partnership incurs such fees to third parties, unaffiliated with the General Partner or the lender, with respect to such indebtedness and no such fee will be paid with respect to borrowings from the General Partner or its affiliates.  There were no debt placement fees earned by the General Partner for the threesix months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.June 30, 2009. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, the General Partner earned approximately $3,000 in such fees.

Equipment Management Fee

The General Partner is entitled to be paid a monthly fee equal to the lesser of (i) the fees which would be charged by an independent third party for similar services for similar equipment or (ii) the sum of (a) two percent of (1) the gross lease revenues attributable to equipment which is subject to full payout net leases which contain net lease provisions plus (2) the purchase price paid on conditional sales contracts as received by the Partnership and (b) 5% of the gross lease revenues attributable to equipment which is subject to operating and capital leases.  For the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2009, and 2008, equipment management fees of approximately $77,000,$149,000 and $86,000,$178,000, respectively, were earned by the General Partner.

Equipment Liquidation Fee

With respect to each item of equipment sold by the General Partner (other than in connection with a conditional sales contract), a fee equal to the lesser of (i) 50% of the competitive equipment sale commission or (ii) three percent of the sales price for such equipment is payable to the General Partner.  The payment of such fee is subordinated to the receipt by the limited partners of (i) a return of their net capital contributions and a 10% per annum cumulative return, compounded daily, on adjusted capital contributions and (ii) the net disposition proceeds from such sale in accordance with the Partnership Agreement.  Such fee will be reduced to the extent any liquidation or resale fees are paid to unaffiliated parties.  For the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2009 and 2008, equipment liquidation fees of approximately $300$1,700 and $200,$17,000, respectively, were earned by the General Partner.

1112
 
5. Notes Payable

Notes payable consisted of the following:

 March 31, 2009  December 31, 2008       
       June 30, 2009  December 31, 2008 
Installment notes payable to banks; interest ranging from 5.25% to 6.20% due in quarterly or monthly installments ranging from $6,588 to $134,671, including interest, with final payments from February through October 2009 $626,766  $989,358 
Installment notes payable to banks; interest ranging from 5.25% to 6.20% due in quarterly or monthly installments ranging from $6,589 to $134,671, including interest, with final payments from January through October 2009 $401,098  $989,358 
                
Installment notes payable to banks; interest ranging from 5.40% to 5.85% due in quarterly installments ranging from $23,643 to $31,661, including interest, with final payments from January through July 2010  271,402   322,037   220,059   322,037 
                
Installment note payable to bank; interest at 5.75% due in quarterly installments of $22,756 including interest, with final payment in January 2011  170,816   190,829   150,515   190,829 
                
Installment note payable to bank; interest at 6.21%, due in monthly installments of $1,368, including interest, with final payment in May 2012.  47,073   49,253   43,684   49,253 
 $1,116,057  $1,551,477  $815,356  $1,551,477 


TheThese notes are secured by specific computer equipment and are nonrecourse liabilities of the Partnership.  As such, the notes do not contain any debt covenants with which we must comply on either an annual or quarterly basis.  Aggregate maturities of notes payable for each of the periods subsequent to March 31,June 30, 2009 are as follows:

 Amount  Amount 
      
Nine months ending December 31, 2009 $855,070 
Six months ending December 31, 2009 $554,372 
Year ended December 31, 2010  216,350   216,348 
Year ended December 31, 2011  37,903   37,903 
Year ended December 31, 2012  6,734   6,733 
 $1,116,057  $815,356 
    

12
At March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the estimated fair value of our debt approximates the carrying value of such instruments due to the interest rates on such debt approximating current market rates.

6. Supplemental Cash Flow Information

Other noncash activities included in the determination of net loss are as follows:

Three months ended March 31, 2009  2008 
Six months ended June 30, 2009  2008 
      
Lease income, net of interest expense on notes payable realized as a result of direct payment of principal by lessee to bank $435,421  $495,179  $736,121  $997,491 

No interest or principal on notes payable was paid by the Partnership because direct payment was made by lessee to the bank in lieu of collection of lease income and payment of interest and principal by the Partnership.

13

Noncash investing and financing activities include the following:

Three months ended March 31, 2009  2008 
Six months ended June 30, 2009  2008 
Debt assumed in connection with purchase of computer equipment $-  $291,642 
Equipment acquisition fees earned by General Partner upon purchase of equipment from prepaid acquisition fees $44,991  $20,500  $124,312  $35,010 
        

The Partnership wrote-off fully amortized acquisition and finance fees of approximately $188,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2009.

Item 2: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements within this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PSLRA”). These statements are being made pursuant to the PSLRA, with the intention of obtaining the benefits of the “safe harbor” provisions of the PSLRA, and, other than as required by law, we assume no obligation to update or supplement such statements. Forward-looking statements are those that do not relate solely to historical fact. They include, but are not limited to, any statement that may predict, forecast, indicate or imply future results, performance, achievements or events. You can identify these statements by the use of words such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expects,” “intend,” “predict” or “project” and variations of these words or comparable words or phrases of similar meaning. These forward-looking statements reflect our current beliefs and expectations with respect to future events and are based on assumptions and are subject to risks and uncertainties and other factors outside our control that may cause actual results to differ materially from those projected.

13
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The Partnership's discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based upon its financial statements which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires the Partnership to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. The Partnership bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

The Partnership believes that its critical accounting policies affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its financial statements.

COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
 
Commonwealth Capital Corp., on behalf of the Partnership and other affiliated partnerships, acquires computer equipment subject to associated debt obligations and lease revenue and allocates a participation in the cost, debt and lease revenue to the various partnerships based on certain risk factors. Depreciation on computer equipment for financial statement purposes is based on the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of four years.

14
REVENUE RECOGNITION

Through March 31,June 30, 2009, the Partnership has only entered into operating leases.  Lease revenue is recognized on a monthly straight-line basis which is generally in accordance with the terms of the operating lease agreement. The Partnership’s leases do not contain any step-rent provisions or escalation clauses nor are lease revenues adjusted based on any index.

The Partnership reviews a customer’s credit history before extending credit and establishes a provision for uncollectible accounts receivable based upon the credit risk of specific customers, historical trends and other information.

LONG-LIVED ASSETS

The Partnership evaluates its long-lived assets when events or circumstances indicate that the value of the asset may not be recoverable.  The Partnership determines whether an impairment exists by estimating the undiscounted cash flows to be generated by each asset.  If the estimated undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value of the asset, an impairment exists.  The amount of the impairment is determined based on the difference between the carrying value and the fair value.  Fair value is determined based on estimated discounted cash flows to be generated by the asset.  The Partnership determined that no impairment existed at June 30, 2009.  The Partnership determined that impairment in the amount of approximately $15,000 existed as of March 31, 2009 andJune 30, 2008.

Depreciation on computer equipment for financial statement purposes is based on the straight-line method estimated generally over useful lives of three to four years.

14
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Partnership’s primary source of cash for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2009 and 2008 was cash provided by operating activities of approximately $627,000$1,415,000 and $734,000,$1,019,000, respectively.  During the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2009 and 2008, equipment was purchased in the amount of approximately $1,125,000 and $513,000, respectively,$3,108,000 and distributions were made to partnerspaid in the amount of approximately $623,000$1,244,000.   Equipment was purchased in the amount of approximately $584,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and $625,000, respectively.distributions were paid in the amount of approximately $1,250,000.  

The Partnership intends to invest approximately $2,000,000$1,000,000 in additional equipment for the remainder of 2009.  The acquisition of this equipment will be funded by debt financing and cash flows from lease rental payments.

For the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2009, the Partnership generated cash flows from operating activities of approximately $627,000,$1,415,000, which includes a net loss of approximately $375,000$844,000, a gain on sale of computer equipment of approximately $19,000 and depreciation and amortization expenses of approximately $1,438,000.$2,949,000.  Other non-cash activities included in the determination of net income include direct payments of lease income by lessees to banks of approximately $435,420.$736,000.

For the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2008, the Partnership generated cash flows from operating activities in the amount of approximately $734,000,$1,019,000, which includes a net loss of approximately $93,000, loss$272,000, a gain on sale of computer equipment of approximately $5,000$82,000 and depreciation and amortization expenses of approximately $1,441,000.$2,915,000.  Other non-cash activities included in the determination of net income include direct payments of lease income by lessees to banks of approximately $495,000.$997,000.

15
At March 31,June 30, 2009, cash was held in two accounts maintained at one financial institution. The accounts were, in the aggregate, federally insured for up to $250,000.  At March 31,June 30, 2009, the total cash balance was as follows:
 
At March 31, 2009   
Total balance Bank $2,442,071 
FDIC insurable limit $250,000 
Exceeded FDIC limit by $2,192,071 
     
At June 30, 2009   
Total bank balance $651,954 
FDIC insurable limit $250,000 
Uninsured amount $401,954 
 
The Partnership can mitigatemitigates this risk by depositing funds with more than one institution and by only depositing funds with major financial institutions. The Partnership has not experienced any losses in such accounts, and believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk. The amount in such accounts will fluctuate throughout 2009 due to many factors, including the pace of additional revenues, equipment acquisitions and distributions. 

The Partnership's investment strategy of acquiring computer equipment and generally leasing it under “triple-net leases” to operators who generally meet specified financial standards minimizes the Partnership's operating expenses.  As of March 31,June 30, 2009, the Partnership had future minimum rentals on non-cancelable operating leases of approximately $3,746,000$2,017,000 for the balance of the year ending December 31, 2009 and approximately $2,013,000$3,486,000 thereafter.  As of March 31,June 30, 2009, the Partnership’s outstanding debt was approximately $1,116,000$815,000 with interest rates ranging from 5.25% to 6.21%, and will be payable through May 2012.

15
The Partnership’s cash from operations is expected to continue to be adequate to cover all operating expenses, liabilities, and preferred distributions to Partners during the next 12-month period.  If available cash flow or net disposition proceeds are insufficient to cover the Partnership expenses and liabilities on a short and long term basis, the Partnership will attempt to obtain additional funds by disposing of or refinancing equipment, or by borrowing within its permissible limits.  The Partnership may, from time to time, reduce the distributions to its Partners if it deems necessary.  Since the Partnership’s leases are on a “triple-net” basis, no reserve for maintenance and repairs is deemed necessary.
 
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Three months ended March 31,June 30, 2009 compared to three months ended March 31,June 30, 2008

For the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2009, the Partnership recognized revenue of approximately $1,550,000$1,489,000 and expenses of approximately $ 1,925,000,$1,958,000, resulting in a net loss of approximately $ 375,000.$469,000.  For the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2008, the Partnership recognized revenue of approximately $1,856,000$1,848,000 and expenses of approximately $1,949,000,$2,028,000, resulting in a net loss of approximately $93,000.$180,000.  

Lease revenue decreased 16 %16% to approximately $1,528,000$1,459,000 for the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2009, from approximately $1,828,000$1,740,000 for the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2008.  This decrease was primarily attributable more lease agreements ending versus new leases commencing, during the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2009.

16
Operating expenses, excluding depreciation, primarily consist of accounting, legal, outside service fees and reimbursement of expenses to CCC for administration and operation of the Partnership.  These expenses ofdecreased 15% to approximately $375,000 remained relatively consistent$360,000 for the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2009 andfrom approximately $422,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2008 primarily due to the steady continuing operationdecreases in reimbursable expenses and Partnership taxes. See “Summary of the Partnership, without the occurrence of any unusual or unexpected expenses.Significant Accounting Policies- Reimbursable Expenses,” in note 2.

The equipment management fee is approximately 5% of the gross lease revenue attributable to equipment that is subject to operating leases. The equipment management fee decreased 11 %21% to approximately $77,000$72,000 for the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2009, from approximately $86,000$92,000 for the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2008, which is consistent with the decrease in lease revenue.

16
Depreciation and amortization expenses consist of depreciation on computer equipment and amortization of equipment acquisition fees. These expenses slightly decreasedincreased to approximately $1,438,000$1,510,000 for the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2009, from $1,441,000$1,474,000 for the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2008. This decreaseincrease is primarily attributable to the acquisition of new equipment being fully amortized and depreciated and not being replacedassociated with as manythe purchase of new leases.

The Partnership sold computer equipment with a net book value of approximately $9,500$25,000 for the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2009, for a net gain of approximately $1,500.$18,000.  The Partnership sold computer equipment with a net book value of approximately $10,000$416,000 for the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2008, for a net gain of approximately $87,000.  

Six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to Six months ended June 30, 2008

For the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Partnership recognized revenue of approximately $3,039,000, and expenses of approximately $3,883,000 resulting in a net loss of approximately $5,000.$844,000.  For the six months ended June 30, 2008, the Partnership recognized revenue of approximately $3,699,000, and expenses of approximately $3,972,000, resulting in a net loss of approximately $272,000.  

Lease revenue decreased 16% to $2,986,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2009, from $3,567,000, for the six months ended June 30, 2008. This decrease was primarily attributable more lease agreements ending versus new leases commencing, during the six months ended June 30, 2009.

Operating expenses, excluding depreciation, primarily consist of accounting, legal, outside service fees and reimbursement of expenses to CCC, a related party, for administration and operation of the Partnership.  These expenses decreased to approximately $735,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2009, from $796,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2009, primarily due to decreases in reimbursable expenses and Partnership taxes. See “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies- Reimbursable Expenses,” in note 2.
17
The equipment management fee is approximately 5% of the gross lease revenue attributable to equipment that is subject to operating leases. The equipment management fee decreased to approximately $149,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2009, from $178,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2008, which is consistent with the decrease in lease income.

Depreciation and amortization expenses consist of depreciation on computer equipment and amortization of equipment acquisition fees. These expenses slightly increased to approximately $2,949,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2009, from $2,915,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2008. This increase was due to the acquisition of new equipment attributable to the purchase of new leases.

The Partnership sold computer equipment with a net book value of approximately $34,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2009, for a net gain of approximately $19,000.  The Partnership sold computer equipment with a net book value of approximately $425,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2008, for a net gain of approximately $82,000.  

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

N/A

Item 4T.  Controls and Procedures

Our management, under the supervision and with the participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial offer, have evaluated the effectiveness of our controls and procedures related to our reporting and disclosure obligations as of March 31,June 30, 2009 which is the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.  Based on that evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are sufficient to provide that (a) material information relating to us, including our consolidated affiliates is made known to these officers by us and our consolidated affiliates’ other employees, particularly material information related to the period for which this periodic report is being prepared; and (b) this information is recorded, processed, summarized, evaluated and reported, as applicable, within the time periods specified in the rules and forms promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.  There have been no significant changes in the General Partner’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect our disclosure controls and procedures in the firstsecond quarter of 2009 or subsequent to the date of the evaluation.

Part II:   OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.                                Legal Proceedings

    In April 2007, our lessee Quick Loan Funding, Inc. began defaulting on its lease payments.  From April 2007 through the first quarter of 2008 we attempted several times to collect payment of outstanding lease payments and to recover the equipment from this lessee. On April 2, 2008, we filed suit in the Superior Court of Orange County, California (Docket No. 30-2008-00104785) against Quick Loan Funding, Inc. and its owner, Daniel Sadek, to recover the unpaid lease payments, late fees and the equipment. In July 2008, we recovered a portion of the equipment leased to Quick Loan Funding, and we are continuing to pursue all available means to recover the remainder of the equipment and the outstanding amounts owed to us.  On September 24, 2008, we obtained a judgment against Quick Loan Funding for all amounts owed to us. We are currently in the process of executing this judgment against any available assets of Quick Loan Funding.  While we believe Quick Loan Funding is currently insolvent, to our knowledge no proceedings in bankruptcy have been initiated. We believe, based on our physical inspection of Quick Loan’s physical assets during our repossession efforts, that Quick Loan Funding may have sufficient assets to cover our judgment lien against it.  To date, the Partnership has recorded a reserve against all outstanding rentals for Quick Loan Funding in the amount of approximately $43,000.   For the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Partnership recorded impairment charges of approximately $63,000 and $18,000, respectively.  As of December 31, 2008June 30, 2009, the equipment has a net book value of zero.  The Partnership has not experienced any significant changes related to this matter during the first quarterAdditionally, in July, known assets of 2009.

    In August 2007, a lessee, MobilePro, Inc. defaulted on lease payments for wi-fi equipment ownedQuick Loan Funding were sold at auction in Orange County, CA and were purchased by the fund.  We were able to cover unpaid amounts by retaining cash collateralour General Partner.  The General Partner is in the formprocess of security deposits, which covered approximately eight monthsreselling certain assets with value, with resale proceeds to be delivered to the Partnership, in an attempt to reduce equity lost on this lease transaction.  Please see the description of additional rent. Since that period, we communicated with and attempted to work with MobileProthe Quick Loan Funding proceeding in the Partnership’s Annual Report on a resolution, through an equipment sale that could satisfy their obligations to us.

17
     As ofForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 it became clear that they could not locate a buyer forunder the equipment.  Therefore, we began to make several demands for payments of back rent not satisfied by the security deposits, and these demands were not satisfied.  Subsequently, on February 10, 2009, our General Partner filed suit against MobilePro and other related parties for collection, in the US District Court for the District of Arizona.heading “Legal Proceedings.”

    Simultaneously, we also filed suitThe Partnership’s legal proceedings against Mobile Pro, Inc. and the City of Tempe, Arizona remain open.  Please see the description of the MobilePro and Tempe proceedings in order to seek access to our equipment, so that we could repossess and remarket the equipment, as Tempe has denied us access.  On March 27, 2009, the City of Tempe filed a response and counterclaim, seeking an unspecified amountPartnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the usefiscal year ended December 31, 2008 under the heading “Legal Proceedings” for a more complete description of the right-of-way on the utility poles where the equipment is located, as well as an unspecified fee for electricity used by the equipment and the city is additionally seeking entitlement to ownership of the equipment. We believe both counterclaims are without merit for several reasons and willthis matter.  The parties continue to enforce our rights toprepare for the equipment.  On May 4, 2009, Mobile Pro filed its response generally denying liability,discovery process and counterclaimed for unspecified damages due to our alleged failure to mitigate our damages. We believe Mobile Pro’s counterclaims are without merit and will continue to pursue our action for damages.  have set a tentative trial date of September 13, 2010.  To date, the Partnership has taken reserves against outstanding rentals of approximately $31,000 to cover potential loss exposure.

As of March 31,June 30, 2009, the Partnership hadhas approximately $126,000$307,000 in accounts receivable due from Chrysler LLC.  In light of Chrysler’s recent filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on April 30, 2009, weChrysler. We believe that a portion of that amount may be uncollectible. PriorTo date, the Partnership has recorded a reserve against all outstanding rentals for Chrysler in the amount of $55,000.  We are currently negotiating a cure resolution agreement with Chrysler, pursuant to their bankruptcy filing, the fund reserved approximately $55,000, duewhich Chrysler is expected to trouble in collections efforts.  Once Chrysler’s reorganization plan is confirmed, we expectagree to know which of their leases will be affirmed or rejected.  Based on information currently available, we believe there is a significant likelihood that thepay certain past due amounts and cure its pre-bankruptcy defaults under its leases.  We expect that upon signing of the cure resolution agreement, we will be collectible, thereforerecover a meaningful percentage of the outstanding receivables.   Therefore, as we have not yet reached a definitive agreement on the cure amounts, we believe the current amount of reserve is adequate through the quarter ended March 31,June 30, 2009.  As further information becomes available, the FundWe may, however, determine that additional reserves may need to increase its reserve in future periodsbe taken to cover potential loss exposure.exposure at a later time.

18
Item 1A.                      Risk Factors

Changes in economic conditions could materially and negatively affect our business.
 
Our business is directly impacted by factors such as economic, political, and market conditions, broad trends in industry and finance, legislative and regulatory changes, changes in government monetary and fiscal policies, and inflation, all of which are beyond our control.  Beginning in 2008 and continuing through the firstsecond quarter of 2009, general worldwide economic conditions experienced a downturn due to the sequential effects of the subprime lending crisis, general credit market crisis, collateral effects on the finance and banking industries, increased energy costs, concerns about inflation, slower economic activity, decreased consumer confidence, reduced corporate profits and capital spending, adverse business conditions and liquidity concerns.  A deterioration in economic conditions, whether caused by national or local concerns, especially within our market area, could result in the following consequences, any of which could hurt business materially: lease delinquencies may increase; problem leases and defaults could increase; and demand for information technology products generally may decrease as businesses attempt to reduce expenses.
Item 2.            Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
N/A
Item 3.            Defaults Upon Senior Securities
N/A
Item 4.Submission of Matters to a Vote of Securities Holders
N/A
Item 5.Other Information
N/A
Item 6.Exhibits

Item 2.                                Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

N/A

18
Item 3.                                Defaults Upon Senior Securities

N/A

Item 4.                                Submission of Matters to a Vote of Securities Holders

N/A

Item 5.                                Other Information

N/A

Item 6.                                Exhibits

31.1 THE RULE 15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
31.2 THE RULE 15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
32.1 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
32.2 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 COMMONWEALTH INCOME & GROWTH FUND V
 BY: COMMONWEALTH INCOME & GROWTH FUND, INC., General Partner


May 15,August 13, 2009
By: /s/ Kimberly A. Springsteen-Abbott
DateKimberly A. Springsteen-Abbott
 Chief Executive Officer
  
May 15,August 13, 2009/s/By: /s/  Lynn A. Franceschina
DateLynn A. Franceschina
 Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer