UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

T QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 or

 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2009    or2010

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number:  333-108057

COMMONWEALTH INCOME & GROWTH FUND V
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Pennsylvania65-1189593
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

Brandywine Bldg. One, Suite 200
2 Christy Drive
Chadds Ford, PA 19317
(Address, including zip code, of principal executive offices)

(610) 594-9600
(Registrant’s telephone number including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (i) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (ii) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days:
YES  T      NO  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).YES  ¨      NO  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of "accelerated filer, “large accelerated filer" and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ¨
Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer ¨
Smaller reporting company T
 (Do not check if a smaller reporting company.) 
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).      YES  ¨ NO T

 
 



 
1

FORM 10-Q
MARCHMarch 31, 2009    2010

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 PART I 
Item 1.Financial Statements3
Item 2.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations13  12
Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk17  15
Item 4T.Controls and Procedures17  15
 PART II 
Item 1.Legal Proceedings17  15
7ItemItem 1 A.Risk Factors18  15
Item 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds18  16
Item 3.Defaults Upon Senior Securities19  16
Item 4.Submission of Matters to a Vote of Securities Holders19  16
Item 5.Other Information19  16
Item 6.Exhibits19  16
   



2


Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
 
Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund V
 
Condensed Balance Sheets 
       
  March 31,  December 31, 
  2010  2009 
  (unaudited)    
Assets      
Cash and cash equivalents $287,602  $556,766 
Lease income receivable, net of reserve of $58,415 at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively  432,675   360,920 
Accounts receivable, Commonwealth Capital Corp.  60,266   - 
Accounts receivable, affiliated limited partnerships  228   10,869 
Other receivables  24,703   16,559 
Prepaid expenses  10,313   4,447 
   815,787   949,561 
         
Computer equipment, at cost  21,668,884   22,568,787 
Accumulated depreciation  (16,264,771)  (16,197,086)
   5,404,113   6,371,701 
         
Equipment acquisition costs and deferred expenses, net of accumulated amortization of  $280,524 and  $353,192 at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively  131,776   160,798 
Prepaid acquisition fees  50,392   55,491 
   182,168   216,289 
         
Total Assets $6,402,068  $7,537,551 
         
Liabilities and Partners' Capital        
Liabilities        
Accounts payable $138,939  $145,883 
Accounts payable, General Partner  99,810   54,394 
Accounts payable, Commonwealth Capital Corp.  -   20,748 
Other accrued expenses  40,767   20,497 
Unearned lease income  162,529   222,701 
Notes payable  182,719   260,986 
Total Liabilities  624,764   725,209 
         
Partners' Capital        
General Partner  1,000   1,000 
Limited Partners  5,776,304   6,811,342 
Total Partners' Capital  5,777,304   6,812,342 
         
Total Liabilities and Partners' Capital $6,402,068  $7,537,551 

see accompanying notes to condensed financial statements


3


 
Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund V
 
Condensed Statements of Operations 
(unaudited) 
       
  Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 2010  March 31, 2009 
       
Revenue      
Lease $937,180  $1,527,745 
Interest and other  26,394   20,908 
Gain on sale of computer equipment  82,096   1,486 
Total Revenue  1,045,670   1,550,139 
         
Expenses        
Operating, excluding depreciation  268,561   374,661 
Equipment management fee, General Partner  46,859   76,992 
Interest  3,701   21,889 
Depreciation  1,074,139   1,377,584 
Amortization of equipment acquisition costs and deferred expenses  34,123   60,673 
Bad debt expense  -   13,000 
Total expenses  1,427,383   1,924,799 
         
Net (loss) $(381,713) $(374,660)
         
Net (loss) allocated to Limited Partners $(387,909) $(380,887)
         
Net (loss) per equivalent limited partnership unit $(0.31) $(0.31)
         
Weighted average number of equivalent limited partnership units outstanding during the period  1,241,923   1,245,500 
Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund V 
Condensed Balance Sheets 
     
  March, 31  December 31, 
  2009  2008 
  (unaudited)    
Assets      
       
Cash $1,922,078  $3,053,703 
Lease income receivable, net of reserve of $115,617  and $128,617 at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively  467,391   320,541 
Accounts receivable, GP  18,516   18,516 
Accounts receivable, CCC  148,450   394,435 
Accounts receivable, affiliated limited partnerships  4,203   300 
Prepaid expenses  16,034   6,422 
   2,576,672   3,793,917 
         
Computer equipment, at cost  22,356,818   21,267,794 
Accumulated depreciation  (13,411,917)  (12,060,593)
   8,944,901   9,207,201 
         
Equipment acquisition costs and deferred expenses, net of accumulated amortization of $482,272 and $449,553 at
March 31, 2009 and at December 31, 2008, respectively
  232,091   247,773 
Prepaid acquisition Fees  135,214   180,205 
   367,305   427,978 
         
         
Total Assets $11,888,878   13,429,096 
         
         
Liabilities and Partners' Capital        
         
Liabilities        
Accounts payable $86,819  $357,751 
Accounts payable, General Partner  31,763   41,112 
Accounts payable, Commonwealth Capital Corp.  12,676   35,387 
Other accrued expenses  48,361   11,302 
Unearned lease income  322,837   142,203 
Notes payable  1,116,057   1,551,477 
Total Liabilities  1,618,513   2,139,232 
         
Partners' Capital        
General partner  1,000   1,000 
Limited partners  10,269,365   11,288,864 
Total Partners' Capital  10,270,365   11,289,864 
         
         
Total Liabilities and Partners' Capital $11,888,878  $13,429,096 


see accompanying notes to condensed financial statements

 
 

34



 
Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund V
 
Condensed Statements of Partners' Capital 
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 
(unaudited) 
                
  General Partner Units  Limited Partner Units  General Partner  Limited Partner  Total 
Balance, January 1, 2010  50   1,242,246  $1,000  $6,811,342  $6,812,342 
Net Income (loss)  -   -   6,196   (387,909)  (381,713)
Redemptions  -   (3,675)  -   (33,920)  (33,920)
Distributions  -   -   (6,196)  (613,209)  (619,405)
Balance, March 31, 2010  50   1,238,571  $1,000  $5,776,304  $5,777,304 
Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund V 
Condensed Statements of Operations 
       
       
       
  Three Months Ended  Three Months Ended 
  March 31,  March 31, 
  2009  2008 
  (unaudited)  (unaudited) 
Revenue      
Lease $1,527,745  $1,827,678 
Interest and other  20,908   28,670 
Gain on sale of computer equipment  1,486   - 
Total Revenue  1,550,139   1,856,348 
         
Expenses        
Operating, excluding depreciation  374,661   373,474 
Equipment management fee, General Partner  76,992   86,305 
Interest  21,889   43,294 
Depreciation  1,377,584   1,363,141 
Amortization of equipment acquisition costs and deferred expenses  60,673   77,779 
Bad debt expense  13,000   - 
Loss on sale of computer equipment  -   4,966 
Total expenses  1,924,799   1,948,959 
         
Net (loss) $(374,660) $(92,611)
         
Net (loss) allocated to limited partners $(380,887) $(98,861)
         
Net (loss) per equivalent limited partnership unit $(0.31) $(0.08)
         
Weighted average number of equivalent limited partnership units outstanding during the period  1,245,500   1,249,951 


see accompanying notes to condensed financial statements



45


Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund V 
Condensed Statements of Cash Flow 
(unaudited) 
       
  Three Months ended 
  March 31, 2010  March 31, 2009 
       
Net cash provided by operating activities $408,613  $627,014 
         
Investing activities:        
Capital expenditures  (127,499)  (1,124,779)
Net proceeds from the sale of computer equipment  103,047   10,979 
Net cash (used in) investing activities  (24,452)  (1,113,800)
         
Financing activities:        
Redemptions  (33,920)  (22,249)
Distributions to partners  (619,405)  (622,590)
Net cash (used in) financing activities  (653,325)  (644,839)
         
Net (decrease) in cash  (269,164)  (1,131,625)
         
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  556,766   3,053,703 
         
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $287,602  $1,922,078 
Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund V 
Condensed Statements of Partners' Capital 
For the three months ended March 31, 2009 
(unaudited) 
  
  
General
Partner Units
  
Limited
Partner Units
  General Partner  Limited Partner  Total 
Balance, January 1, 2009  50   1,245,852  $1,000  $11,288,864  $11,289,864 
Net Income (loss)  -   -   6,227   (380,887)  (374,660)
Redemptions  -   (2,000)  -   (22,249)  (22,249)
Distributions  -   -   (6,227)  (616,363)  (622,589)
Balance, March 31, 2009  50   1,243,852  $1,000  $10,269,365  $10,270,365 

see accompanying notes to condensed financial statements


5


Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund V 
Condensed Statements of Cash Flow 
       
  Three Months ended  Three Months ended 
  March 31,  March 31, 
  2009  2008 
  (unaudited)  (unaudited) 
       
Net cash provided by operating activities $627,014  $734,134 
         
Investing activities:        
Capital Expenditures  (1,124,779)  (512,509)
Prepaid acquisition fees  44,991   20,500 
Net proceeds from the sale of computer equipment  10,979   4,856 
Equipment acquisition fees, General Partner  (44,991)  (20,500)
Net cash (used in) investing activities  (1,113,800)  (507,653)
         
Financing activities:        
Redemptions  (22,249)  - 
Distributions to partners  (622,590)  (624,974)
Net cash (used in) financing activities  (644,839)  (624,974)
         
Net (decrease) in cash  (1,131,625)  (398,493)
Cash beginning of period  3,053,703   4,114,953 
         
Cash end of period $1,922,078  $3,716,460 

see accompanying notes to condensed financial statements
6



NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Business

Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund V (the “Partnership”) is a limited partnership organized in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania onin May 19, 2003.  The Partnership offered for sale up to 1,250,000 units of the limited partnership at the purchase price of $20 per unit (the “Offering”“offering”).  The Partnership reached the minimum amount in escrow and commenced operations on March 14, 2005.  As of February 24, 2006, the Partnership was fully subscribed.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010 limited partners redeemed 3,675 units of the partnership for a total redemption price of approximately $34,000 in accordance with the terms of the limited partnership agreement.

The Partnership used the proceeds of the Offeringoffering to acquire, own and lease various types of information technology (I.T.) equipment and other similar capital equipment, which is leased primarily to U.S. corporations and institutions. 
Commonwealth Capital Corp. (“CCC”), on behalf of the Partnership and other affiliated partnerships, acquires computer equipment subject to associated debt obligations and lease agreements and allocatesallocate a participation in the cost, debt and lease revenue to the various partnerships that it manages based on certain risk factors.

The Partnership’s General Partner is Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund, Inc. (the “General Partner”), a Pennsylvania corporation which is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of CCC.  CCC is a member of the Investment Program Association (IPA), Financial Planning Association (FPA), and the Equipment Leasing and Finance Association (ELFA).  Approximately ten years after the commencement of operations, the Partnership intends to sell or otherwise dispose of all of its computer equipment, make final distributions to partners, and to dissolve.  Unless sooner terminated, the Partnership will continue until December 31, 2015.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”), which provides guidance on measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities. SFAS 157 applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value but does not expand the use of fair value to any new circumstances. This standard also requires additional disclosures in both annual and quarterly reports.  As of January 1, 2008 the Partnership adopted SFAS No. 157 for all financial assets.  Adoption of this pronouncement did not impact the 2008 financial statements of the Partnership.   In February 2008,  FASB issued FSP FAS 157-2 to provide a one-year deferral of the effective date of Statement 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed in financial statements at fair value on a recurring basis (that is, at least annually).   The adoption of SFAS 157-2 on January 1, 2009 did not have a material impact on the Partnership’s financial statements.

In January 2009, FASB issued FSP EITF 99-20-1, “Amendments to the Impairment Guidance of EITF Issue No. 99-20 (“FSP EITF 99-20-1”). FSP EITF 99-20-1 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2008. Retroactive application is not permitted. The adoption of FSP EITF 99-20-1 did not have a significant impact on the Partnership’s financial position or results of operations.

7

In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 107-1 (“FSP FAS 107-1”) and APB 28-1 (“APB 28-1”), which amends FASB Statement No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments and APB Opinion NO. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, to require disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods. FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 will be effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of this staff position is not expected to have a material impact on the Partnership’s financial position or results of operation

Basis of Presentation

The financial information presented as of any date other than December 31, 20082009 has been prepared from the books and records without audit.  Financial information as of December 31, 20082009 has been derived from the audited financial statements of the Partnership, but does not include all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles to be included in audited financial statements.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial information for the periods indicated, have been included.  For further information regarding the Partnership’s accounting policies, refer to the financial statements and related notes included in the Partnership’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.2009.  Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 20092010 are not necessarily indicative of financial results that may be expected for the full year ended December 31, 2010.

Disclosure of Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Estimated fair value was determined by management using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies.  However, judgment was necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated fair value.  The Partnership holds no financial instruments, except notes payable. Cash, receivables, accounts payable and accrued expenses and other liabilities are carried at amounts which reasonably approximate their fair values as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.

The Partnership’s long-term debt consists of notes payable, which are secured by specific computer equipment and are nonrecourse liabilities of the Partnership. The estimated fair value of this debt at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 approximates the carrying value of these instruments, due to the interest rates approximating current market values.

Disclosure about fair value of financial instruments is based on pertinent information available to management as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. 

7

Long-Lived Assets

The Partnership evaluates its long-lived assets when events or circumstances indicate that the value of the asset may not be recoverable.  The Partnership determines whether an impairment exists by estimating the undiscounted cash flows to be generated by each asset.  If the estimated undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value of the asset, then an impairment exists.  The amount of the impairment is determined based on the difference between the carrying value and the fair value.  FairThe fair value is determined based on estimated discounted cash flows to be generated by the asset.  The Partnershippartnership determined that no impairment existedanalysis was necessary at March 31, 2010 and 2009 and 2008.as no impairment indicators were noted.

Depreciation on computer equipment for financial statement purposes is based on the straight-line method estimated generally over useful lives of three toor four years.

Reimbursable Expenses

Reimbursable expenses, which are charged to the Partnership by CCC in connection with the administration and operation of the Partnership, are allocated to the Partnership based upon several factors including, but not limited to, the number of investors, compliance issues, and the number of existing leases.  For example, if the Partnership has more investors than another program sponsored by CCC, then higher amounts of expenses related to investor services, mailing and printing costs will be allocated to the Partnership.  Also, while a Partnership is in its offering stage, higher compliance costs are allocated to it than to a program not in its offering stage, as compliance resources are utilized to review incoming investor suitability and proper documentation.  Finally, lease related expenses, such as due diligence, correspondence,corres pondence, collection efforts and analysis staff costs, increase as programs purchase more leases, and decrease as leases terminate and equipment is sold. All of these factors contribute to CCC’s determination as to the amount of expenses to allocate to the Partnership or to other sponsored programs.  For the Partnership, all reimbursable expenses are expensed as they are incurred.

8

Cash and cash equivalents

At March 31, 20092010 cash was held in two accounts maintained at one financial institution. The accounts were, in the aggregate, federally insured for up to $250,000.  At March 31, 2009,2010, the total cash balance was as follows:

At March 31, 2009   
Total balance Bank $2,442,071 
FDIC insurable limit $250,000 
Exceeded FDIC limit by $2,192,071 
     
At March 31, 2010
Total bank balance $   308,000
FDIC insurable limit  (250,000)
Uninsured amount $     58,000

The Partnership can mitigate thismitigates the risk by depositing funds with more than one institution andof holding uninsured deposits by only depositing funds with major a financial institutions.institution.  The Partnership deposits its funds with a Moody's Aaa-Rated banking institution which is one of only three Aaa-Rated banks listed on the New York Stock Exchange.  The Partnership has not experienced any losses in such accounts, and believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk. The amount in such accounts will fluctuate throughout 20092010 due to many factors, including the pace of additional revenues,cash receipts, equipment acquisitions and distributions. distributions to investors.

Net Income (Loss) Per Equivalent Limited Partnership Unit

The net income (loss) per equivalent limited partnership unit is computed based upon net income (loss) allocated to the limited partners and the weighted average number of equivalent units outstanding during the period.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-06 (“ASC Update 2010-06”) Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements, to enhance the usefulness of fair value measurements. ASU 2010-06 amends the disclosures about fair value measurements in FASB Accounting Standards Codification™ (ASC) 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.  The amended guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disaggregation requirement for the reconciliation disclosure of Level 3 measurements, which is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those years. The Partnership adopted this ASU in the first quarter of 2010. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Partnership’s financial statements.

In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-04 (“ASC Update 2010-04”) Accounting for Various Topics – Technical Corrections to SEC Paragraphs.  The purpose of this ASU is to make technical corrections to certain guidance issued by the SEC that is included in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC).  Primarily, this ASU changes references to various FASB and AICPA pronouncements to the appropriate ASC paragraph numbers. The Partnership adopted this ASU in the first quarter of 2010. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Partnership’s financial statements.

In December 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-17, (“ASC Update 2009-17”), Consolidations (ASC 810) – Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities. This ASU incorporates FAS 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), into the Codification. The new requirements are effective as of the beginning of the Partnership’s first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2009. During the first quarter of 2010, the Partnership adopted this ASU. The adoption of this s tandard did not have a material impact on the Partnership’s financial statements.

In December 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-16, (“ASC Update 2009-16”) Transfers and Servicing (ASC 860) – Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets . This ASU incorporates FAS 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140, into the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification). The new requirements are effective for transfers of financial assets occurring in fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009.This standard will require more information about transferred financial assets, including securitization transactions, and where entities have continuing exposur e to the risks related to transferred financial assets. During the first quarter of 2010, the Partnership adopted this ASU. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Partnership’s financial statements.

8

3. Computer Equipment

The Partnership is the lessor of equipment under operating leases with periods that generally rangingwill range from 12 to 48 months.  In general, associated costs such as repairs and maintenance, insurance and property taxes are paid by the lessee.

Through March 31, 2009,2010, the Partnership has onlysolely entered into operating leases.  Lease revenue is recognized on thea monthly straight-line basis which is generally in accordance with the terms of the operating lease agreements.  

The company’sPartnership’s leases do not contain any step-rent provisions or escalation clauses nor are lease revenues adjusted based on any index.

9

Remarketing fees are paid to the leasing companies from which the Partnership purchases leases.  These are fees that are earned by the leasing companies when the initial terms of the lease have been met and the equipment is re-leased or sold.met.  The General Partner believes that this strategy adds value since it entices the leasing company to "stay with the lease" for potential extensions, remarketing or sale of equipment.  This strategy potentially minimizesis designed to minimize any conflicts the leasing company may have with a potential new leaselessee and will potentiallymay assist in maximizing overall portfolio performance.  The remarketing fee is tied into lease performance thresholds and is factoreda factor in the negotiation of the fee.  Remarketing fees incurred in connection with lease extensions are accounted for as operating costs.  Remarketing fees incurred in connectioncon nection with the sale of computer equipment are included in our gain or loss calculations.  For the three months ended March 31, 20092010 and 2008,2009, the Partnership incurred remarketing fees of approximately $7,000$23,000 and $2,600,$7,000, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 the Partnership paid approximately $12,000 and $5,000, respectively, in such fees.  No such fees were paid for the three months ended March 31, 2008.

CCC, on behalf of the Partnership and on behalf of other affiliated partnerships, acquires computer equipment subject to associated debt obligations and lease agreements and allocates a participation in the cost, debt and lease revenue to the various partnerships based on certain risk factors.    The Partnership’s share of the computer equipment in which it participates with other partnerships at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 20082010 was approximately $9,920,000$11,691,000 and $9,480,000, respectively, which is included in the Partnership’s fixed assets on its balance sheet.  The total cost of the equipment shared by the Partnership with other partnerships at March 31, 2009 and2010 was approximately $35,417,000.  
The Partnership’s share of the equipment in which it participates with other partnerships at December 31, 20082009 was approximately $25,068,000$11,564,000 and $23,272,000, respectively.is included in the Partnership’s fixed assets on its balance sheet.  The total cost of the equipment shared by the Partnership with other partnerships at December 31, 2009 was approximately $34,907,000.   The Partnership’s share of the outstanding debt associated with this equipment at MarchDecember 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was $923,000 and $1,183,000, respectively.$201,000.  The total outstanding debt related to the equipment shared by the Partnership at MarchDecember 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was approximately $2,728,000$973,000.

As the Partnership and $3,349,000, respectively.the other programs managed by the General Partner increase their overall portfolio size, opportunities for shared participation are expected to continue. Sharing in the acquisition of a lease portfolio gives the fund an opportunity to acquire additional assets and revenue streams, while allowing the fund to remain diversified and reducing its overall risk with respect to one portfolio.  Thus, total shared equipment and related debt should continue to trend higher for the remainder of 2010 as the Partnership builds its portfolio.

The following is a schedule of future minimum rentals on noncancellablenon-cancellable operating leases at March 31, 2009:2010:
Amount
Nine Months ended December 31, 2010$   1,651,000
Year ended December 31, 20111,187,000
Year ended December 31, 2012307,000
$   3,145,000

9

  Amount 
    
Nine months ended December 31, 2009 $3,746,203 
Year ended December 31, 2010  1,330,970 
Year ended December 31, 2011  569,544 
Year ended December 31, 2012  112,855 
  $5,759,572 
     

4. Related Party Transactions

Receivables/Payables

As of March 31, 2009,2010, the Partnership’s related party receivables and payables are short term, unsecured, and non-interest bearing.
 
Three months ended March 31,20102009
   
Reimbursable expenses  
Reimbursable expenses, which are charged to the Partnership by CCC in connection with the administration and operation of the Partnership, are allocated to the Partnership based upon several factors including, but not limited to, the number of investors, compliance issues, and the number of existing leases.  See "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Reimbursable Expenses," above.$   227,000$   341,000

   
Equipment acquisition fee  
The General Partner earned an equipment acquisition fee of 4% of the purchase price of each item of equipment purchased as compensation for the negotiation of the acquisition of the equipment and lease thereof or sale under a conditional sales contract.   At March 31, 2010, the remaining balance of prepaid acquisition fees was approximately $50,000, which is expected to be earned in future periods.$   5,000$   45,000
   
Debt placement fee  
As compensation for arranging term debt to finance the acquisition of equipment by the Partnership, the General Partner is paid a fee equal to 1% of such indebtedness, provided, however, that such fee shall be reduced to the extent the Partnership incurs such fees to third parties, unaffiliated with the General Partner or the lender, with respect to such indebtedness and no such fee will be paid with respect to borrowings from the General Partner or its affiliates.$   -$   -

   
Equipment management fee  
The General Partner is entitled to be paid for managing the equipment portfolio a monthly fee equal to the lesser of (i) the fees which would be charged by an independent third party for similar services for similar equipment or (ii) the sum of (a) two percent of (1) the gross lease revenues attributable to equipment which is subject to full payout net leases which contain net lease provisions plus (2) the purchase price paid on conditional sales contracts as received by the Partnership and (b) 5% of the gross lease revenues attributable to equipment which is subject to operating and capital leases.$   47,000$   77,000
   
Equipment liquidation fee  
With respect to each item of equipment sold by the General Partner (other than in connection with a conditional sales contract), a fee equal to the lesser of (i) 50% of the competitive equipment sale commission or (ii) three percent of the sales price for such equipment is payable to the General Partner.  The payment of such fee is subordinated to the receipt by the limited partners of (i) a return of their net capital contributions and a 10% per annum cumulative return, compounded daily, on adjusted capital contributions and (ii) the net disposition proceeds from such sale in accordance with the Partnership Agreement.  Such fee will be reduced to the extent any liquidation or resale fees are paid to unaffiliated parties.$   2,500$   300
   
10

 
Reimbursable Expenses

See “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies- Reimbursable Expenses,” above. During the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Partnership recorded approximately $341,000 and $376,000, respectively, for reimbursement of expenses to the General Partner.

Equipment Acquisition Fee

The General Partner is entitled to be paid an equipment acquisition fee of 4% of the purchase price of each item of equipment purchased as compensation for the negotiation of the acquisition of the equipment and lease thereof or sale under a conditional sales contract.  For the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, equipment acquisition fees of approximately $45,000 and $20,000, respectively, were earned.  The remaining balance of approximately $135,000 will be earned in future periods.
Debt Placement Fee

As compensation for arranging term debt to finance the acquisition of equipment by the Partnership, the General Partner is paid a fee equal to 1% of such indebtedness; provided, however, that such fee shall be reduced to the extent the Partnership incurs such fees to third parties, unaffiliated with the General Partner or the lender, with respect to such indebtedness and no such fee will be paid with respect to borrowings from the General Partner or its affiliates.  There were no debt placement fees earned by the General Partner for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.

Equipment Management Fee

The General Partner is entitled to be paid a monthly fee equal to the lesser of (i) the fees which would be charged by an independent third party for similar services for similar equipment or (ii) the sum of (a) two percent of (1) the gross lease revenues attributable to equipment which is subject to full payout net leases which contain net lease provisions plus (2) the purchase price paid on conditional sales contracts as received by the Partnership and (b) 5% of the gross lease revenues attributable to equipment which is subject to operating and capital leases.  For the three months ended March 31, 2009, and 2008, equipment management fees of approximately $77,000, and $86,000, respectively, were earned by the General Partner.

Equipment Liquidation Fee

With respect to each item of equipment sold by the General Partner (other than in connection with a conditional sales contract), a fee equal to the lesser of (i) 50% of the competitive equipment sale commission or (ii) three percent of the sales price for such equipment is payable to the General Partner.  The payment of such fee is subordinated to the receipt by the limited partners of (i) a return of their net capital contributions and a 10% per annum cumulative return, compounded daily, on adjusted capital contributions and (ii) the net disposition proceeds from such sale in accordance with the Partnership Agreement.  Such fee will be reduced to the extent any liquidation or resale fees are paid to unaffiliated parties.  For the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, equipment liquidation fees of approximately $300 and $200, respectively, were earned by the General Partner.
11

 
5. Notes Payable

Notes payable consisted of the following:following amounts:

  
March 31,
 2010
  
December 31,
 2009
 
       
        
Installment notes payable to banks; interest ranging from 5.40% to 5.85% due in quarterly installments of  $23,643 and  $31,661, including interest, with final payments from January through July 2010 $62,000   $115,000 
          
Installment note payable to bank; interest at 5.75% due in quarterly installments of $22,756 including interest, with final payment in January 2011  88,000    109,000 
          
Installment note payable to bank; interest at 6.21%, due in monthly installments of $1,368, including interest, with final payment in May 2012  33,000    37,000 
  $183,000   $261,000 
 
  March 31, 2009  December 31, 2008 
       
Installment notes payable to banks; interest ranging from 5.25% to 6.20% due in quarterly or monthly installments ranging from $6,588 to $134,671, including interest, with final payments from February through October 2009 $626,766  $989,358 
         
Installment notes payable to banks; interest ranging from 5.40% to 5.85% due in quarterly installments ranging from $23,643 to $31,661, including interest, with final payments from January through July 2010  271,402   322,037 
         
Installment note payable to bank; interest at 5.75% due in quarterly installments of $22,756 including interest, with final payment in January 2011  170,816   190,829 
         
Installment note payable to bank; interest at 6.21%, due in monthly installments of $1,368, including interest, with final payment in May 2012.  47,073   49,253 
  $1,116,057  $1,551,477 


TheThese notes are secured by specific computer equipment and are nonrecourse liabilities of the Partnership.  As such, the notes do not contain any debt covenants with which we must comply on either an annual or quarterly basis.  Aggregate maturities of notes payable for each of the periods subsequent to March 31, 20092010 are as follows:

  Amount 
    
Nine months ending December 31, 2009 $855,070 
Year ended December 31, 2010  216,350 
Year ended December 31, 2011  37,903 
Year ended December 31, 2012  6,734 
  $1,116,057 
     
Amount
Nine months ending December 31, 2010$      138,000
Year ended December 31, 201138,000
Year ended December 31, 20127,000
$      183,000

12

At March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the estimated fair value of our debt approximates the carrying value of such instruments due to the interest rates on such debt approximating current market rates.

6. Supplemental Cash Flow Information

Other noncash activities included in the determination of net loss are as follows:

Three months ended March 31, 2009  2008 
Lease income, net of interest expense on notes payable realized as a result of direct payment of principal by lessee to bank $435,421  $495,179 
Three months ended March 31, 201020102009
Lease revenue net of interest expense on notes payable realized as a result of  direct payment of principal by lessee to bank $      78,000 $    435,000
   

No interest or principal on notes payable was paid by the Partnership because direct payment was made by lessee to the bank in lieu of collection of lease income and payment of interest and principal by the Partnership.

11


Noncash investing and financing activities include the following:following:

Three months ended March 31, 2009  2008 
Equipment acquisition fees earned by General Partner upon purchase of equipment from prepaid acquisition fees $44,991  $20,500 
Three months ended March 31, 201020102009
Equipment acquisition fees earned by General Partner, upon purchase of equipment, from prepaid acquisition fees $       5,000 $         45,000

At March 31, 2010, the Partnership wrote-off fully amortized acquisition and finance fees of approximately $107,000.

Item 2: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements within this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PSLRA”). These statements are being made pursuant to the PSLRA, with the intention of obtaining the benefits of the “safe harbor” provisions of the PSLRA, and, other than as required by law, we assume no obligation to update or supplement such statements. Forward-looking statements are those that do not relate solely to historical fact. They include, but are not limited to, any statement that may predict, forecast, indicate or imply future results, performance, achievements or events. You can identify these statements by the use of words such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “anticipate,” “believe,“b elieve,” “estimate,” “expects,” “intend,” “predict” or “project” and variations of these words or comparable words or phrases of similar meaning. These forward-looking statements reflect our current beliefs and expectations with respect to future events and are based on assumptions and are subject to risks and uncertainties and other factors outside our control that may cause actual results to differ materially from those projected.

13

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The Partnership'sOur discussion and analysis of itsour financial condition and results of operations are based upon itsour financial statements which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires the Partnershipus to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. The Partnership bases itsWe base these estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

The Partnership believesWe believe that itsour critical accounting policies affect itsour more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of itsour financial statements.

COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
 
Commonwealth Capital Corp., on our behalf and on behalf of the Partnership and other affiliated partnerships, acquires computer equipment subject to associated debt obligations and lease revenue and allocates a participation in the cost, debt and lease revenue to the various partnerships based on certain risk factors.  Depreciation on computer equipment for financial statement purposes is based on the straight-line method estimated generally over estimated useful lives of two to four years.

REVENUE RECOGNITION

Through March 31, 2009, the Partnership has only2010, we have solely entered into operating leases.  Lease revenue is recognized on a monthly straight-line basis which is generally in accordance with the terms of the operating lease agreement. The Partnership’s

Our leases do not contain any step-rent provisions or escalation clauses nor are lease revenues adjusted based on any index.

The Partnership reviewsWe review a customer’s credit history before extending credit and establishescredit. In the event of a default, we may establish a provision for uncollectible accounts receivable based upon the credit risk of specific customers, historical trends andor other information.

12

LONG-LIVED ASSETS

The Partnership evaluates itsWe evaluate our long-lived assets when events or circumstances indicate that the value of the asset may not be recoverable.  The Partnership determinesWe determine whether an impairment exists by estimating the undiscounted cash flows to be generated by each asset.  If the estimated undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value of the asset anthen impairment exists.  The amount of the impairment is determined based on the difference between the carrying value and the fair value.  FairThe fair value is determined based on estimated discounted cash flows to be generated by the asset. The PartnershipWe determined that no impairment existed as ofanalysis was necessary at March 31, 2010 and 2009 and 2008.as no impairment indicators were noted.

Depreciation on computer equipment for financial statement purposes is based on the straight-line method estimated generally over useful lives of three to four years.

14

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Partnership’sOur primary source of cash for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 20082010 was cash provided by operating activities of approximately $627,000$409,000 and $734,000, respectively.  Duringfrom the proceeds from the sale of equipment of approximately $103,000.  This compares to the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, equipmentwhere our primary source of cash was purchased in the amountfrom operating activities of approximately $1,125,000$627,000 and $513,000, respectively,proceeds from the sale of equipment were approximately $11,000.

Our primary use of cash for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was for the purchase of new information technology equipment of approximately $128,000 and also for distributions were made to partners in the amount of approximately $623,000 and $625,000, respectively.

The Partnership intends to invest approximately $2,000,000 in additional equipment for the remainder of 2009.  The acquisition of this equipment will be funded by debt financing and cash flows from lease rental payments.

$619,000.  For the three months ended March 31, 2009 distributions to partners were approximately $623,000, and our capital expenditures were approximately $1,125,000.

Capital expenditures and distributions are expected to increase overall during the Partnership generatedremainder of 2010, as management focuses on additional equipment acquisitions and funding limited partner distributions. We intend to invest approximately $1,350,000 in additional equipment during the remainder of 2010.  The acquisition of this equipment will be primarily funded by debt financing. Any debt service will be funded from cash flows from lease rental payments, and not from public offering proceeds.

Cash was provided by operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2010 of approximately $409,000, which includes a net loss of approximately $382,000 and depreciation and amortization expenses of approximately $1,108,000. Other non-cash activities included in the determination of net loss include direct payments of lease income by lessees to banks of approximately $78,000. Additionally we had a gain on the sale of equipment in the amount of $82,000 and an increase in receivables of lease revenue of $72,000.  For the three months ended March 31, 2009 cash was also generated by operating activities of approximately $627,000, which includes a net loss of approximately $375,000 and depreciation and amortization expenses of approximately $1,438,000. Other non-cash activities included in the determination of net income includeloss incl ude direct payments of lease income by lessees to banks of approximately $435,420.$435,000.

ForAs we continue to increase the three months ended March 31, 2008,size of our equipment portfolio, operating expenses will increase, which reflects the Partnership generated cash flows fromadministrative costs of servicing the portfolio, but because of our investment strategy of leasing technology equipment primarily through triple-net leases, we avoid operating activities of approximately $734,000, which includes a net loss of approximately $93,000, loss on sale of computerexpenses related to equipment of approximately $5,000 and depreciation and amortizationmaintenance or taxes.  Depreciation expenses of approximately $1,441,000.  Other non-cash activities included in the determination of net income include direct payments of lease income by lesseeswill likely increase more rapidly than operating expenses as we add technology equipment to banks of approximately $495,000.our portfolio.

13

At March 31, 2009,2010 cash was held in two accounts maintained at one financial institution. The accounts were, in the aggregate, federally insured for up to $250,000.  At March 31, 2009,2010, the total cash balance was as follows:

At March 31, 2009   
Total balance Bank $2,442,071 
FDIC insurable limit $250,000 
Exceeded FDIC limit by $2,192,071 
     
At March 31, 2010
Total bank balance $   308,000
FDIC insurable limit  (250,000)
Uninsured amount $    58,000
 
The Partnership canWe mitigate thisthe risk by depositing funds with more than one institution andof holding uninsured deposits by only depositing funds with major a financial institutions. The Partnership hasinstitution.  We deposit our funds with a Moody's Aaa-Rated banking institution which is one of only three Aaa-Rated banks listed on the New York Stock Exchange.  We have not experienced any losses in such accounts, and believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk. The amount in such accounts will fluctuate throughout 20092010 due to many factors, including the pace of additional revenues,cash receipts, equipment acquisitions and distributions. distributions to investors.

The Partnership'sOur investment strategy of acquiring computer equipment and generally leasing it under “triple-net leases”triple-net leases to operators who generally meet specified financial standards minimizes the Partnership'sour operating expenses.  As of March 31, 2009, the Partnership2010, we had future minimum rentals on non-cancelable operating leases of approximately $3,746,000$1,651,000 for the balance of the year ending December 31, 20092010 and approximately $2,013,000$1,494,000 thereafter.  

As of March 31, 2009, the Partnership’s outstanding2010, our debt was approximately $1,116,000$183,000, with interest rates ranging from 5.25%5.40% to 6.21%, and will be payable through May 2012.

15

The Partnership’sOur cash from operations is expected to continue to be adequate to cover all operating expenses, liabilities, and preferred distributions to Partners during the next 12-month period.   If available cash flow or net disposition proceeds are insufficient to cover the Partnershipour expenses and liabilities on a short and long term basis, the Partnershipwe will attempt to obtain additional funds by disposing of or refinancing equipment, or by borrowing within itsour permissible limits.  The Partnership may, from time to time, reduce the distributions to its Partners if it deems necessary.  Since the Partnership’sour leases are on a “triple-net”triple-net basis, no reserve for maintenance and repairs is deemed necessary.
 
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Three months ended March 31, 20092010 compared to three months ended March 31, 20082009

For the three months ended March 31, 2010, we recognized revenue of approximately $1,046,000 and expenses of approximately $1,428,000, resulting in a net loss of approximately $382,000.  This net loss is primarily due to depreciation and amortization expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2010 which were greater than lease revenue for the same period.  For the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Partnershipwe recognized revenue of approximately $1,550,000 and expenses of approximately $ 1,925,000, resulting in a net loss of approximately $ 375,000.  For

Our lease revenue decreased to approximately $937,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Partnership recognized revenue of approximately $1,856,000 and expenses of approximately $1,949,000, resulting in a net loss of approximately $93,000.

Lease revenue decreased 16 % to2010, from approximately $1,528,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009, from approximately $1,828,0002009.  This decrease was primarily due to more lease agreements ending versus new lease agreements being acquired during the three months ended March 31, 2010.

Interest and other revenue increased to $26,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2008.  This decrease was primarily attributable more lease agreements ending versus new leases commencing, during2010 from $21,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009.2009 due to an increase in other income from our lessees, related to damaged equipment, partially offset by lower interest income attributable to decreased cash balances held in financial institutions. The amounts in our bank accounts that generate interest revenue will fluctuate throughout 2010 due to many factors, including the pace of cash receipts, equipment acquisitions and distributions to limited partners.

OperatingOur operating expenses, excluding depreciation, primarily consist of accounting and legal fees, outside service fees and reimbursement of expenses to CCC for administration and operation of the Partnership.  These expenses ofdecreased to approximately $375,000 remained relatively consistent$269,000 for the three months ended March 31, 20092010, from approximately $375,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009.  This decrease is primarily attributable to decreases in accounting, legal and 2008 primarilyvarious administrative expenses due to the steady continuing operation of the Partnership, without the occurrence of any unusual or unexpected expenses.enhanced operating efficiencies.

14

We pay an equipment management fee to our general partner for managing our equipment portfolio. The equipment management fee is approximately 5% of the gross lease revenue attributable to equipment that is subject to operating leases. The equipment management fee decreased 11 % to approximately $47,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 from approximately $77,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009, from approximately $86,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2008, which is consistent with the decrease in lease revenue.

16

Depreciation and amortization expenses consist of depreciation on computer equipment and amortization of equipment acquisition fees. These expenses slightly decreased to approximately $1,108,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, from $1,438,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009, from $1,441,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2008.2010. This decrease is primarily attributablewas due to equipment and acquisition fees being fully depreciated/amortized and depreciated and not being replaced with as many new leases.equipment purchases.

The PartnershipWe sold computer equipment with a net book value of approximately $21,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, for a net gain of approximately $82,000. This compared to equipment that we sold for the three months ended March 31, 2009 with a net book value of approximately $9,500, for the three months ended March 31, 2009, for a net gain of approximately $1,500.  The Partnership sold computer equipment with a net book value of approximately $10,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2008, for a net loss of approximately $5,000.  

Item 3. Quantitative3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

N/A

Item 4T.  Controls and Procedures

Our management, under the supervision and with the participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial offer, have evaluated the effectiveness of our controls and procedures related to our reporting and disclosure obligations as of March 31, 20092010 which is the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.  Based on that evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are sufficienteffective to provide that (a) material information relating to us, including our consolidated affiliates is made known to these officers by us and our consolidated affiliates’ other employees, particularly material information related to the period for which this periodic report is being prepared; and (b) this information is recorded,recorde d, processed, summarized, evaluated and reported, as applicable, within the time periods specified in the rules and forms promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.  There have been no significant changes in the General Partner’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect our disclosure controls and procedures in the first quarter of 20092010 or subsequent to the date of the evaluation.

Part II:   OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings

    In April 2007, our lessee Quick Loan Funding, Inc. began defaulting on its lease payments.  From April 2007 through the first quarter of 2008 we attempted several times to collect payment of outstanding lease payments and to recover the equipment from this lessee. On April 2, 2008, we filed suit in the Superior Court of Orange County, California (Docket No. 30-2008-00104785) against Quick Loan Funding, Inc. and its owner, Daniel Sadek, to recover the unpaid lease payments, late fees and the equipment. In July 2008, we recovered a portion of the equipment leased to Quick Loan Funding, and we are continuing to pursue all available means to recover the remainder of the equipment and the outstanding amounts owed to us.  On September 24, 2008, we obtained a judgment against Quick Loan Funding for all amounts owed to us. We are currently in the process of executing this judgment against any available assets of Quick Loan Funding.  While we believe Quick Loan Funding is currently insolvent, to our knowledge noThe Partnership’s legal proceedings in bankruptcy have been initiated. We believe, based on our physical inspection of Quick Loan’s physical assets during our repossession efforts, that Quick Loan Funding may have sufficient assets to cover our judgment lien against it.  To date, the Partnership has recorded a reserve against all outstanding rentals in the amount of approximately $43,000.   For the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Partnership recorded impairment charges of approximately $63,000 and $18,000, respectively. As of December 31, 2008 the equipment has a net book value of zero.  The Partnership has not experienced any significant changes related to this matter during the first quarter of 2009.

    In August 2007, a lessee, MobilePro, Inc. defaulted on lease payments for wi-fi equipment owned by the fund.  We were able to cover unpaid amounts by retaining cash collateral in the form of security deposits, which covered approximately eight months of additional rent. Since that period, we communicated with and attempted to work with MobilePro on a resolution, through an equipment sale that could satisfy their obligations to us.

17

     As of December 31, 2008, it became clear that they could not locate a buyer for the equipment.  Therefore, we began to make several demands for payments of back rent not satisfied by the security deposits, and these demands were not satisfied.  Subsequently, on February 10, 2009, our General Partner filed suit against MobilePro and other related parties for collection, in the US District Court for the District of Arizona.

    Simultaneously, we also filed suit against the City of Tempe, Arizona remain open.  Please see the description of the MobilePro/Tempe proceedings in order to seek access to our equipment, so that we could repossessthe Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 under the heading “Legal Proceedings” for a more complete description of this matter.  The parties are currently engaged in the discovery process and remarket the equipment, as Tempe has denied us access.  On March 27, 2009,have set a tentative trial date of September 13, 2010.  Our General Partner may engage in settlement discussions with the City of Tempe filed a response and counterclaim, seeking an unspecified amount for the use of the right-of-way on the utility poles where the equipment is located, as well as an unspecified fee for electricity used by the equipment and the city is additionally seeking entitlementprior to ownership of the equipment. We believe both counterclaims are without merit for several reasons and will continue to enforce our rights to the equipment.  On May 4, 2009, Mobile Pro filed its response generally denying liability, and counterclaimed for unspecified damages due to our alleged failure to mitigate our damages. We believe Mobile Pro’s counterclaims are without merit and will continue to pursue our action for damages.  trial.  To date, the Partnership has taken reserves against outstanding rentals of approximately $31,000 to cover potential loss exposure.

    AsIn October 2009 we entered into a cure resolution agreement with Chrysler LLC, pursuant to which Chrysler paid, in November 2009, approximately $62,000 of March 31, 2009,past due amounts to cure its pre-bankruptcy defaults under its leases. Based upon this cure payment, we recovered 82.4% of the Partnership had approximately $126,000 in accounts receivablepre-bankruptcy receivables due from Chrysler LLC.  In light ofand we are no longer involved in Chrysler’s recent filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on April 30, 2009, we believe that a portion of that amount may be uncollectible.  Prior to their bankruptcy filing, the fund reserved approximately $55,000, due to trouble in collections efforts.  Once Chrysler’s reorganization plan is confirmed, we expect to know which of their leases will be affirmed or rejected.  Based on information currently available, we believe there is a significant likelihood that the past due amounts will be collectible, therefore we believe the current amount of reserve is adequate through the quarter ended March 31, 2009.  As further information becomes available, the Fund may need to increase its reserve in future periods to cover potential loss exposure.proceedings. 

Item 1A.   Risk Factors

Changes in economic conditions could materially and negatively affect our business.
 
Our business is directly impacted by factors such as economic, political, and market conditions, broad trends in industry and finance, legislative and regulatory changes, changes in government monetary and fiscal policies, and inflation, all of which are beyond our control.  Beginning in 2008 and continuing through the first quarter of 2009,2010, general worldwide economic conditions experienced a downturn due to the sequential effects of the subprime lending crisis, general credit market crisis, collateral effects on the finance and banking industries, increased energy costs, concerns about inflation, slower economic activity, decreased consumer confidence, reduced corporate profits and capital spending, adverse business conditions and liquidity concerns.  A deterioration in economic conditions, whether caused by national or locallo cal concerns, especially within our market area, could result in the following consequences, any of which could hurt business materially: lease delinquencies may increase; problem leases and defaults could increase; and demand for information technology products generally may decrease as businesses attempt to reduce expenses.

Item 2.                                Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

N/A

1815

Item 2.          Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
N/A
Item 3.          Defaults Upon Senior Securities
N/A
Item 4.Submission of Matters to a Vote of Securities Holders
N/A
Item 5.Other Information
N/A
Item 6.Exhibits
Item 3.                                Defaults Upon Senior Securities

N/A

Item 4.                                Submission of Matters to a Vote of Securities Holders

N/A

Item 5.                                Other Information

N/A

Item 6.                                Exhibits

31.1 THE RULE 15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
31.2 THE RULE 15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
32.1 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
32.2 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

SIGNATURE
SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 COMMONWEALTH INCOME & GROWTH FUND V
 BY: COMMONWEALTH INCOME & GROWTH FUND, INC., General Partner


May 15, 200917, 2010
By: /s/ Kimberly A. Springsteen-Abbott
DateKimberly A. Springsteen-Abbott
 Chief Executive Officer
  
May 15, 200917, 2010/s/By: /s/  Lynn A. Franceschina
DateLynn A. Franceschina
 Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer