QuickLinksTable of Contents-- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

ýQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 20082009


OR

o


TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                             to                            

Commission file number 1-9924

Citigroup Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 52-1568099
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

399 Park Avenue, New York, New York
(Address of principal executive offices)

 

10043
(Zip Code)

(212) 559-1000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý    No o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o    No o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ý Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 Smaller reporting company o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o    No ý

        Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date:

Common stock outstanding as of March 31, 2008: 5,249,833,1032009: 5,512,800,000

Available on the Web at www.citigroup.com




CITIGROUP INC.

Citigroup Inc.FIRST QUARTER OF 2009—FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part I—Financial Information



Page No.
Item 1.

THE COMPANY

 Financial Statements:



Consolidated Statement of Income (Unaudited)—Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 and 2007


60



Consolidated Balance Sheet—March 31, 2008 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2007


61



Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (Unaudited)—Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 and 2007


62



Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited)—Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 and 2007


63



Consolidated Balance Sheet—Citibank, N.A. and Subsidiaries March 31, 2008 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2007


64



Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)


65

Item 2.


Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations


5 - 58



Summary of Selected Financial Data


4



First Quarter of 2008 Management Summary


5



Events in 2008


6



Segment, Product and Regional Net Income and Net Revenues


8 - 11



Managing Global Risk


20



Interest Revenue/Expense and Yields


33



Capital Resources and Liquidity


38



Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements


44



Forward-Looking Statements


58

Item 3.


Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk


26 - 312
 

Citigroup Segments

 91 - 94
3

Item 4.

Citigroup Regions



Controls and Procedures


583

Part II—Other Information

Item 1.


Legal Proceedings


119

Item 1A.


Risk Factors


121

Item 2.


Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds


121

Item 4.


Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders


122

Item 6.


Exhibits


123

Signatures


124

Exhibit Index


125

THE COMPANY

        Citigroup Inc. (Citigroup and, together with its subsidiaries, the Company) is a global diversified financial services holding company whose businesses provide a broad range of financial services to consumer and corporate customers. Citigroup has more than 200 million customer accounts and does business in more than 100 countries. Citigroup was incorporated in 1988 under the laws of the State of Delaware.

        The Company is a bank holding company within the meaning of the U.S. Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 registered with, and subject to examination by, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB). Some of the Company's subsidiaries are subject to supervision and examination by their respective federal and state authorities.

        This quarterly report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with Citigroup's 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Additional financial, statistical, and business-related information, as well as business and segment trends, is included in a Financial Supplement that was filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on Apri1 18, 2008.

        The principal executive offices of the Company are located at 399 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10043, telephone number 212 559 1000. Additional information about Citigroup is available on the Company's Web site atwww.citigroup.com. Citigroup's annual report on Form 10-K, its quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, its current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to these reports are available free of charge through the Company's Web site by clicking on the "Investor Relations" page and selecting "All SEC Filings." The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Web site contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding the Company atwww.sec.gov.

        Citigroup was managed along the following segment and product lines through the first quarter of 2008:

GRAPHIC

The following are the six regions in which Citigroup operates. The regional results are fully reflected in the product results.

GRAPHIC


(1)
Disclosure includes Canada and Puerto Rico.

CITIGROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

 
 Three Months Ended
March 31,

  
 
In millions of dollars,
except per share amounts


 %
Change

 
 2008
 2007
 
Net interest revenue $13,473 $10,612 27%
Non-interest revenue  (254) 14,847 NM 
  
 
 
 
Revenues, net of interest expense $13,219 $25,459 (48)%
Operating expenses  16,216  15,571 4 
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims  6,026  2,967 NM 
  
 
 
 
Income (loss) before taxes and minority interest $(9,023)$6,921 NM 
Income taxes (benefits)  (3,891) 1,862 NM 
Minority interest, net of taxes  (21) 47 NM 
  
 
 
 
Net Income (loss) $(5,111)$5,012 NM 
  
 
 
 
Earnings per share         
 Basic $(1.02)$1.02 NM 
 Diluted(1)  (1.02) 1.01 NM 
Dividends declared per common share  0.32  0.54 (41)%
  
 
 
 
At March 31:         
Total assets $2,199,848 $2,020,966 9%
Total deposits  831,208  738,521 13 
Long-term debt  424,959  310,768 37 
Mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts  23,959  9,440 NM 
Common stockholders' equity  108,835  121,083 (10)
Total stockholders' equity  128,219  122,083 5 
  
 
 
 
Ratios:         
Return on common stockholders' equity(2)  (18.6)% 17.1%  
  
 
 
 
Tier 1 Capital  7.74% 8.26%  
Total Capital  11.22% 11.48   
Leverage(3)  4.39% 4.84   
  
 
 
 
Common Stockholders' equity to assets  4.95% 5.99%  
Dividend payout ratio(4)  N/A  53.5   
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends  0.45x  1.39x   
  
 
 
 

(1)
Due to the net loss in the first quarter of 2008, basic shares were used to calculate diluted earnings per share. Adding diluted securities to the denominator would result in anti-dilution.

(2)
The return on average common stockholders' equity is calculated using net income (loss) minus preferred stock dividends.

(3)
Tier 1 Capital divided by adjusted average assets.

(4)
Dividends declared per common share as a percentage of net income per diluted share. For the first quarter of 2008, the dividend payout ratio was not calculable due to the net loss.

NM
Not meaningful

        Certain statements in this Form 10-Q, including, but not limited to, statements made in "Management's Discussion and Analysis," are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on management's current expectations and are subject to uncertainty and changes in circumstances. Actual results may differ materially from those included in these statements due to a variety of factors including, but not limited to, those described in Citigroup's 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K under "Risk Factors" beginning on page 38.


4

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


6

FIRST QUARTER OF 2008 MANAGEMENT SUMMARYManagement Summary


6

        Citigroup reported a $5.1 billion net loss ($1.02 per share) for the first quarter of 2008. The first quarter results were driven by two main factors: write-downs and losses related to the continued disruption Events in the fixed income markets and higher U.S. consumer credit costs. Results also include a $661 million pretax gain on the sale of Redecard shares and a $633 million increase to pretax earnings for Visa-related items.2009

        Revenues were $13.2 billion, down 48% from a year ago, primarily as a result of a $13.4 billion decrease in CMB revenues, including $6.0 billion in write-downs and credit costs on subprime-related direct exposures, write-downs of $3.1 billion (net of underwriting fees) on funded and unfunded highly leveraged financing commitments, a downward credit value adjustment of $1.5 billion related to exposure to monoline insurers, and write-downs of $1.5 billion on auction rate securities inventory and $1.0 billion on Alt-A mortgage securities.

        International Consumer revenues were up 33% and International Global Wealth Management (GWM) revenues more than doubled, reflecting double-digit organic growth and results from Nikko Cordial. U.S. Consumer revenues were up 3% from the prior year, while Alternative Investments recorded negative revenues of $358 million. Transaction Services had another record quarter, with revenues up 42%.

        Customer volume growth was strong, with average loans up 17%, average deposits up 16%, and average interest-earning assets up 10%. International Cards purchase sales were up 41%, while U.S. Cards sales were up 4%. In GWM, client assets under fee-based management were up 15%.

        Net interest revenue increased 27% from last year, reflecting volume increases across most products. Net interest margin (NIM) in the first quarter of 2008 was 2.83%, up 36 basis points from the first quarter of 2007, reflecting significantly lower cost of funding, partially offset by a decrease in asset yields related to the decrease in the fed funds rate. (See discussion of NIM on page 33).

        Operating expenses increased 4% from the first quarter of 2007 (foreign exchange translation accounted for 3%). The major components of the change are $622 million in repositioning charges related to our re-engineering plan, a $250 million reserve related to an offer to facilitate GWM clients' liquidation from a specific Citi-managed fund, a $202 million write-down on the multi-strategy hedge fund intangible asset related to Old Lane and the impact of acquisitions. Partially offsetting these items were the $166 million Visa-related litigation reserve release and a $282 million benefit resulting from a legal vehicle restructuring in our Mexico business. The first quarter of 2007 included a $1.4 billion restructuring charge related to our Structural Expense Initiatives review. Expenses were down 2% from the fourth quarter of 2007.

        During the first quarter of 2008, the Company recorded a net build of $1.9 billion to its credit reserves. The build consisted of $1.8 billion in Global Consumer ($1.4 billion in U.S. Consumer and $424 million in International Consumer) and $148 million in Markets & Banking. The Global Consumer loss rate was 2.50%, an 81 basis-point increase from the first quarter of 2007. Corporate cash-basis loans increased $1.5 billion from year-ago levels.

        The effective tax rate (benefit) of (43)% in the first quarter of 2008 primarily resulted from the pretax losses in the Company's S&B business taxed in the U.S. (the U.S. is a higher tax jurisdiction). In addition, the tax benefits of permanent differences, including the tax benefit for not providing U.S. income taxes on the earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries that are indefinitely invested, favorably affected the Company's effective tax rate.

        Our stockholders' equity and trust preferred securities were $152.2 billion at March 31, 2008, reflecting preferred stock issuances of $19.4 billion during the quarter. We distributed $1.7 billion in common dividends to shareholders during the quarter. Citigroup maintained its "well-capitalized" position with a Tier 1 Capital Ratio of 7.74% at March 31, 2008.

        We raised an additional $6.0 billion of capital through a preferred stock issuance on April 28, 2008 and sold approximately $4.9 billion of common stock (scheduled to close on May 5, 2008), which includes the over-allotment option that was exercised on May 1, 2008. On a pro forma basis, taking into account the issuances of this preferred and common stock, the Company's March 31, 2008 Tier 1 Capital ratio would have been approximately 8.7%.

        On March 31, 2008, we announced a comprehensive reorganization of Citigroup's organizational structure to achieve greater client focus and connectivity, global product excellence, and clear accountability. The new organizational structure will allow us to focus resources towards growth in emerging and developed markets and improve efficiencies throughout the Company.


7

EVENTS IN 2008SEGMENT AND REGIONAL—NET INCOME (LOSS) AND REVENUES

Write-Downs on Subprime-Related Direct Exposures


12

During the first quarterCitigroup Net Income (Loss)—Segment View


12

Citigroup Net Income (Loss)—Regional View


13

Citigroup Revenues—Segment View


14

Citigroup Revenues—Regional View


15

GLOBAL CARDS


16

CONSUMER BANKING


18

INSTITUTIONAL CLIENTS GROUP (ICG)


20

GLOBAL WEALTH MANAGEMENT


22

CORPORATE/OTHER


23

REGIONAL DISCUSSIONS


24

North America


24

EMEA


25

Latin America


26

Asia


27

TARP AND OTHER REGULATORY PROGRAMS


28

MANAGING GLOBAL RISK


32

Details of 2008, the Company'sS&B business recorded unrealized losses of $6.0 billion pretax, net of hedges, on its subprime-related direct exposures.Credit Loss Experience


32

Non-Performing Assets


33

The Company's remaining $29.1 billionSignificant Exposures in U.S. subprime net direct exposure inS&B at March 31, 2008 consisted of (a) approximately $22.7 billion of net exposures to the super senior tranches of collateralized debt obligations, which are collateralized by asset-backed securities, derivatives on asset-backed securities or bothSecurities and (b) approximately $6.4 billion of subprime-related exposures in its lending and structuring business. See "Exposure to U.S. Residential Real Estate" on page 22 for a further discussion of such exposures and the associated losses recorded during the first quarter of 2008.Banking


35

Write-Downs on Highly Leveraged Loans and Financing Commitments

        Due to the continued dislocation of the credit markets and the reduced market interest in higher risk/higher yield instruments that began during the second half of 2007, liquidity in the market for highly leveraged financings has declined significantly.

        Citigroup's exposure to highly leveraged financings totaled $38 billion at March 31, 2008 ($21 billion in funded and $17 billion in unfunded commitments). This compares to total exposure of $43 billion ($22 billion in funded and $21 billion in unfunded commitments) at December 31, 2007. During the first quarter of 2008, the Company recorded a $3.1 billion pretax write-down on these exposures, net of underwriting fees.

        Since March 31, 2008, the Company transferred approximately $12 billion of loans to third parties, of which $8.5 billion relates to the highly leveraged loans and commitments. This structure allows Citigroup to lock in the sales proceeds and significantly reduces further downside price risk associated with these commitments. See "Highly Leveraged Financing Commitments" on page 56 for further discussion.

Write-Downs on Monoline Insurers

        During the first quarter of 2008, Citigroup recorded pretax write-downs on credit market value adjustments (CMVA) of $1.5 billion on its exposure to monoline insurers. The CMVA is calculated by applying the counterparty's current credit spread to the expected exposure on the trade. The majority of those receivables relate to hedges on super senior positions that were executed with various monoline insurance companies. During the quarter, credit spreads on monoline insurers continued to widen and expected exposures increased. See "Direct Exposure to Monolines" on page 24 for a further discussion.

Write-downs on Auction Rate Securities

        As of March 31, 2008 the Company reported $6.5 billion of auction rate securities classified as Trading assets. During the first quarter of 2008, S&B recorded $1.5 billion of pretax write-downs on auction rate securities, primarily due to failed auctions as liquidity diminished because of deterioration in the credit markets.

Write-downs on Alt-A Mortgage Securities in S&B

        During the first quarter of 2008, Citigroup recorded pretax losses of approximately $1.0 billion, net of hedges, on Alt-A mortgage securities held in S&B. For these purposes, Alt-A mortgage securities are non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) where: (1) the underlying collateral has weighted average FICO scores between 680 and 720 or, (2) for instances where FICO scores are greater than 720, RMBS have 30% or less of the underlying collateral comprised of full documentation loans.

        The Company had $18 billion in Alt-A mortgage securities carried at fair value at March 31, 2008 in S&B, which decreased from $22 billion at December 31, 2007. Of the $18 billion, $4.7 billion was classified as Trading assets, on which $900 million of fair value write-downs, net of hedging, were recorded in earnings, and $13.6 billion were classified as available-for-sale investments, on which $120 million of write-downs were recorded in earnings due to other than temporary impairments. In addition, $2.0 billion of pretax fair value write-downs were recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (OCI).

Write-Downs on Commercial Real Estate Exposures

        S&B's commercial real estate exposure can be split into three categories: assets held at fair value, loans and commitments, and equity and other investments. For the assets held at fair value, (which includes a $2 billion portfolio of available-for-sale securities), Citigroup recorded a $600 million of fair value write-downs, net of hedges, during the first quarter of 2008. See page 24 for a discussion of Citigroup's exposure to commercial real estate.

Credit Reserves

        During the first quarter of 2008, the Company recorded a net build of $1.9 billion to its credit reserves. The build consisted of $1.8 billion in Global Consumer ($1.4 billion in U.S. Consumer and $424 million in International Consumer) and $148 million in Markets & Banking.

        The $1.4 billion build in U.S. Consumer primarily reflected a weakening of leading credit indicators, including higher delinquencies on first and second mortgages, unsecured personal loans, credit cards and auto loans. Reserves also increased due to trends in the U.S. macro-economic environment, including the housing market downturn and rising unemployment rates, as well as portfolio growth.

        The $424 million build in International Consumer was primarily driven by Mexico and India cards and India consumer finance, as well as by acquisitions and portfolio growth.

        The build of $148 million in Markets & Banking primarily reflected an increase for specific counterparties.

Visa Restructuring and Litigation Matters


36

During the first quarter of 2008, Citigroup recorded a $633 million increaseDirect Exposure to pretax income resulting from events surrounding Visa. These events include (1) a $359 million gain on the redemption of Visa shares primarily recorded inU.S. Consumer; (2) a $108 million gain from an adjustment of the regional share allocation related to the fourth quarter 2007 Visa reorganization primarily recorded inInternational Consumer; and (3) a $166 million reduction of litigationMonolines


37

Highly Leveraged Financing Transactions


38

reserves that were originally booked DERIVATIVES


39

Market Risk Management Process


43

Operational Risk Management Process


45

Country and Cross-Border Risk


46

INTEREST REVENUE/EXPENSE AND YIELDS


47

AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES—ASSETS


48

Average Balances and Interest Rates—Liabilities and Equity, and Net Interest Revenue


49

Analysis of Changes in the fourth quarterInterest Revenue


50

Analysis of 2007 primarilyChanges inU.S. Consumer. Interest Expense and Net Interest Revenue


51

Repositioning ChargesCAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY


52

        In the first quarter Capital Resources


52

Common Equity


55

Funding


58

Liquidity


61

Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements


62

FAIR VALUATION


63

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES


63

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS


63

TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES


64

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


65

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


71

OTHER INFORMATION


154

Legal Proceedings


154

Risk Factors


156

Unregistered Sales of 2008, Citigroup recorded repositioning chargesEquity Securities and Use of $622 million relatedProceeds


157

Submission of Matters to Citigroup's ongoing reengineering plan, which will result in certain branch closings and headcount reductionsa Vote of approximately 9,000 employees.Security Holders


158

Signatures


161

Exhibit Index


162

Table of Contents


THE COMPANY

        Citigroup Inc. (Citigroup and, together with its subsidiaries, the Company, Citi or Citigroup) is a global diversified financial services holding company whose businesses provide a broad range of financial services to consumer and corporate customers. Citigroup has more than 200 million customer accounts and does business in more than 100 countries. Citigroup was incorporated in 1988 under the laws of the State of Delaware.

        The Company is a bank holding company within the meaning of the U.S. Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 registered with, and subject to examination by, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB). Some of the Company's subsidiaries are subject to supervision and examination by their respective federal and state authorities.

        This quarterly report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with Citigroup's 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Additional financial, statistical, and business-related information, as well as business and segment trends, are included in a Financial Supplement that was filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on Apri1 17, 2009. On January 16, 2009, Citigroup announced a realignment of its businesses to be effective, for financial reporting purposes, in the second quarter of 2009. Accordingly, Citi's businesses in this Form 10-Q are presented under the same structure that was reported at December 31, 2008.

        The principal executive offices of the Company are located at 399 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10043, telephone number 212 559 1000. Additional information about Citigroup is available on the Company's Web site atwww.citigroup.com. Citigroup's recent annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, as well as the Company's other filings with the SEC are available free of charge through the Company's Web site by clicking on the "Investors" page and selecting "All SEC Filings." The SEC Web site contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding the Company atwww.sec.gov.


Table of Contents

        At March 31, 2009, Citigroup was managed along the following segment and product lines:

GRAPHIC

        The following are the four regions in which Citigroup operates. The regional results are fully reflected in the segment results.

GRAPHIC


(1)
Asia includes Japan,Latin America includes Mexico, andNorth America includes U.S., Canada and Puerto Rico.

Table of Contents

CITIGROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

 
 Three Months Ended
March 31,
  
 
In millions of dollars,
except per share amounts
 %
Change
 
 2009 2008 

Net interest revenue

 $12,898 $13,068  (1)%

Non-interest revenue

  11,891  (627) NM 
        

Revenues, net of interest expense

  24,789  12,441  99%

Operating expenses

  12,087  15,775  (23)

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

  10,307  5,852  76 
        

Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations before Income Taxes

  2,395  (9,186) NM 

Income taxes (benefits)

  785  (3,939) NM 
        

Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations

  1,610  (5,247) NM 

Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, net of taxes

  (33) 115  NM 
        

Net Income (Loss) before attribution of Noncontrolling Interests

  1,577  (5,132) NM 

Net Income (Loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

  (16) (21) 24%
        

Citigroup's Net Income (Loss)

 $1,593 $(5,111) NM 
        

Less:

          
 

Preferred dividends—Basic

  1,221  83  NM 
 

Impact of the conversion price reset related to the $12.5 billion convertible preferred stock private issuance—Basic(1)

  1,285    NM 
 

Preferred stock Series H discount accretion—Basic(1)

  53    NM 
        

Income (loss) available to common stockholders for Basic EPS

 $(966)$(5,194) 81%
        

Earnings per share

          
 

Basic(2)

          
 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $(0.18)$(1.06) 83%
 

Net income (loss)

 $(0.18)$(1.03) 83 
        
 

Diluted(2)

          
 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $(0.18)$(1.06) 83%
 

Net income (loss)

  (0.18) (1.03) 83 

Dividends declared per common share

 $0.01 $0.32  (97)
        

At March 31:

          

Total assets

 $1,822,578 $2,199,697  (17)%

Total deposits

  762,696  831,208  (8)

Long-term debt

  337,252  424,959  (21)

Mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts

  24,532  23,959  2 

Common stockholders' equity

  69,688  108,684  (36)

Total stockholders' equity

 $143,934 $128,068  12 

Direct staff(in thousands)

  309  369  (16)
        

Ratios:

          

Return on common stockholders' equity(3)

  (5.6)% (18.6)%   
        

Tier 1 Common(4)

  2.16% 4.22%   

Tier 1 Capital

  11.92% 7.71%   

Total Capital

  15.61% 11.18%   

Leverage(5)

  6.60% 4.45%   
        

Common stockholders' equity to assets

  3.82% 4.94%   

Dividend payout ratio(6)

  N/A  N/A    

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends

  1.06x  NM    
        

(1)
The first quarter of 2009 Income available to common shareholders includes a reduction of $1.285 billion related to a conversion price reset pursuant to Citigroup's prior agreement with the purchasers of $12.5 billion convertible preferred stock issued in a private offering in January 2008. The conversion price was reset from $31.62 per share to $26.35 per share. The reset will result in Citigroup's issuing up to approximately 79 million additional common shares when the preferred stock is converted. There is no impact to net income, total stockholders' equity or capital ratios due to the reset. However, the reset resulted in a reclassification from Retained earnings to Additional paid-in capital of $1.285 billion and a reduction in Income available to common shareholders of $1.285 billion. Income available to common shareholders for the first quarter of 2009 also includes a reduction of $53 million related to the quarterly preferred stock Series H discount accretion.

(2)
The Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Staff Position (FSP) Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) 03-6-1 "Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities" on January 1, 2009. All prior periods have been restated to conform to the current presentation. The Diluted EPS calculation for the first quarters of 2008 and 2009 utilize Basic shares and Income available to common shareholders (Basic) due to the negative Income available to common shareholders. Using actual Diluted shares and Income available to common shareholders (Diluted) would result in anti-dilution.

(3)
The return on average common stockholders' equity is calculated using income/(loss) available to common stockholders.

(4)
The Tier 1 Common ratio represents Tier 1 Capital less perpetual preferred stock, qualifying minority interests in subsidiaries and qualifying trust preferred securities divided by risk-weighted assets.

(5)
The Leverage ratio represents Tier 1 Capital divided by each period's quarterly adjusted average assets.

Table of Contents

(6)
Dividends declared per common share as a percentage of net income per diluted share. For the first quarters of 2009 and 2008, the dividend payout ratio was not calculable due to the net loss.

NM    Not meaningful

        Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior periods' financial statements to conform to the current period's presentation.

        Certain statements in this Form 10-Q, including, but not limited to, statements made in "Management's Discussion and Analysis," are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on management's current expectations and are subject to uncertainty and changes in circumstances. Actual results may differ materially from those included in these statements due to a variety of factors including, but not limited to, those described in Citigroup's 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K under "Risk Factors."

        Within this Form 10-Q, please refer to the indices on pages 1 and 64 for page references to the Management's Discussion and Analysis section and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, respectively.


Table of Contents


MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

FIRST QUARTER OF 2009 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY

        Citigroup reported net income of $1.593 billion for the first quarter of 2009. The results reflected Revenues of $24.8 billion, driven by strong results inICG, partially offset by net write-downs, $7.3 billion in net credit losses and a $2.7 billion net loan loss reserve builds.

        The $0.18 loss per share reflected the reset in January 2009 of the conversion price of $12.5 billion of convertible preferred stock issued in a private offering in January 2008. This did not have an impact on net income or total capital but resulted in a reduction to income available to common shareholders of $1.285 billion or $0.24 per share. Without this reduction, EPS was positive. The loss per share also reflected preferred stock dividends and the quarterly accretion of the Series H warrant discount, which did not impact net income but reduced income available to common shareholders by $1.274 billion.

        Revenues of $24.8 billion increased 99% from year-ago levels, with sequential improvement across all regions. Strong trading results and lower net write-downs (partially attributable to a positive credit valuation adjustment (CVA) in respect of the Company's own debt and derivatives) in S&B drove revenues. The difficult economic environment continued to have a negative impact on all businesses.

        Net interest revenue declined 1% from the 2008 first quarter, reflecting the smaller balance sheet. Net interest margin in the first quarter of 2009 was 3.30%, up 50 basis points from the first quarter of 2008, reflecting significantly lower cost of funding, partially offset by a decrease in asset yields related to the decrease in the fed funds rate. Non-interest revenue increased $12.5 billion from a year ago, primarily reflecting lower write-downs on highly leveraged finance commitments, subprime-related direct exposures and other fixed income exposures.

        Operating expenses decreased 23% from the previous year, reflecting benefits from Citi's ongoing re-engineering efforts, the impact of foreign exchange translation, and a $250 million litigation reserve release. Expenses in the prior-year period included $626 million of net non-recurring charges. Expenses have continued their downward momentum, due to lower compensation costs and continued benefits from re-engineering efforts. Headcount was down 60,000 from March 31, 2008 and 14,000 from December 31, 2008.

        The Company's equity capital base and trust preferred securities were $168.5 billion at March 31, 2009. Citigroup's Stockholders' equity increased by $2.3 billion during the first quarter of 2009 to $143.9 billion. The Company issued $3.6 billion in preferred stock and warrants related to the loss-sharing agreement during the first quarter and distributed $1.06 billion in dividends to its preferred shareholders. Citigroup had a Tier 1 Capital Ratio of 11.92% at March 31, 2009.

        During the first quarter of 2009, the Company recorded a net build of $2.7 billion to its credit reserves. The net build consisted of $2.3 billion inGlobal Cards andConsumer Banking ($1.6 billion inNorth America Consumer and $642 million in regions outside ofNorth America), $313 million inICG and $94 million inGWM. The Consumer credit loss rate was 4.64%, a 212 basis-point increase from the first quarter of 2008. Corporate cash-basis loans were $10.8 billion at March 31, 2009, an increase of $8.8 billion from year-ago levels. This increase is primarily attributable to the transfer of non-accrual loans from the held-for-sale portfolio to the held-for-investment portfolio during the fourth quarter of 2008. The allowance for loan losses totaled $31.7 billion at March 31, 2009, a coverage ratio of 4.82% of total loans.

        The Company's effective tax rate was 32.8% in the first quarter of 2009, which includes a tax benefit of $110 million relating to the conclusion of the audit of certain issues in the Company's 2003-2005 U.S. Federal tax audit.

        At March 31, 2009, the Company had increased its structural liquidity (equity, long-term debt and deposits) as a percentage of assets from 66% at December 31, 2008 to approximately 68% at March 31, 2009. Citigroup has continued its deleveraging, reducing total assets from $1,938 billion at December 31, 2008 to $1,823 billion at March 31, 2009.

        At March 31, 2009, the maturity profile of Citigroup's senior long-term unsecured borrowings had a weighted average maturity of seven years.

        On February 27, 2009, the Company announced an exchange offer of its common stock for up to $27.5 billion of its existing preferred securities and trust preferred securities at a conversion price of $3.25 per share (Exchange Offer). On May 7, 2009, the Company announced that it will expand the Exchange Offer by increasing the maximum amount of preferred securities and trust preferred securities that it will accept in the Exchange Offer by $5.5 billion to a total of $33 billion. All other terms of the Exchange Offer, including that the U.S. government (USG) will match the Exchange Offer up to a maximum of $25 billion of its preferred stock at the same conversion price, remain unchanged. The increase in the Exchange Offer reflects the results of the USG's Supervisory Capital Assessment Program (SCAP) and will further increase the Company's Tier 1 Common without any additional USG investment or conversion of USG securities into common stock.

        In April 2009, Citi's shareholders elected four new directors to its board. Additionally, the Company recently announced several senior management appointments, including Edward (Ned) Kelly as Chief Financial Officer, replacing Gary Crittenden, who was appointed Chairman of Citi Holdings.

        During the first quarter of 2009, Citi continued to extend significant amounts of credit to U.S. consumers and continued to focus on supporting the U.S. housing market. In the first quarter of 2009, Citi successfully worked with approximately 80,000 borrowers, whose mortgages Citi owns or services, to avoid potential foreclosure through modifications, extensions, forbearances, and reinstatements of loans totaling more than $9 billion. Citi was able to keep more than 9 out of 10 distressed borrowers with Citi mortgages owned by the Company in their homes. Also, Citi's U.S. Cards business is currently providing help to 1.3 million card members to help them manage their credit card debt through a variety of forbearance programs.


Table of Contents

EVENTS IN 2009

        Certain significant events during the first quarter of 2009 had, or could have, an effect on Citigroup's current and future financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and capital resources. These events are summarized below and discussed in more detail throughout this MD&A.

EXCHANGE OFFER AND CONVERSIONS

        On February 27, 2009, Citigroup announced an exchange offer of its common stock for up to a total of $27.5 billion of its existing preferred securities and trust preferred securities at a conversion price of $3.25 per share (Exchange Offer). As described above, on May 7, 2009, the Company announced that it will expand the Exchange Offer by increasing the maximum amount of preferred securities and trust preferred securities that it will accept in the Exchange Offer by $5.5 billion to a total of $33 billion. All other terms of the Exchange Offer, including that the USG will match the Exchange Offer up to a maximum of $25 billion of its preferred stock at the same conversion price, remain unchanged. All remaining preferred stock held by the USG that is not converted to common stock in the Exchange Offer will be exchanged into newly issued 8% trust preferred securities.

        This transaction could increase Tier 1 Common of the Company from the first quarter of 2009 level of $22.1 billion to as much as $86.2 billion, which assumes the exchange of $33 billion of preferred securities and trust preferred securities, the maximum eligible under the transaction. Citi's tangible common equity (TCE), which was $30.9 billion as of March 31, 2009, will increase by as much as $60.4 billion to up to $91.3 billion.

        Based on the maximum participation in the Exchange Offer, the USG would own approximately 34% of Citi's outstanding common stock and existing common stockholders would own approximately 24% of the outstanding common stock.

        Citi intends to continue to pay full dividends on the preferred stock up to and including the closing of the public exchange offers, at which point the dividends will be suspended. Citi does not intend to pay common stock dividends during this period. The Company has no plans to suspend distributions at current rates on its trust preferred securities.

        The accounting for the Exchange Offer will result in the de-recognition of preferred stock and the recognition of the common stock issued at fair value, in theCommon stock andAdditional paid-in capital accounts in equity. The difference between the carrying amount of preferred stock and the fair value of the common stock will be recorded inRetained earnings (impacting net income available to common shareholders and EPS) orAdditional paid-in capital accounts in equity, depending on whether the preferred stock was originally non-convertible or convertible.

        For USG preferred stock that is converted to 8% trust preferred securities, the newly issued trust preferred securities will be initially recorded at fair value asLong-term debt. The difference between the carrying amount of the preferred stock and the fair value of the trust preferred securities will be recorded inRetained earnings after adjusting for appropriate deferred tax liability (impacting net income available to common shareholders and EPS).

        On January 23, 2009, pursuant to Citigroup's prior agreement with the purchasers of the $12.5 billion of convertible preferred stock issued in a private offering in January 2008, the conversion price was reset from $31.62 per share to $26.35 per share. The reset will result in Citigroup's issuing up to approximately 79 million additional common shares when the preferred stock is converted. There was no impact toNet income, total Citigroup stockholders' equity or capital ratios due to the reset. However, the reset resulted in a reclassification fromRetained earnings toAdditional paid-in capital of $1.285 billion reflecting the benefit of the reset to the preferred stockholders. The reclassification of $1.285 billion represents (i) the reset conversion rate ($12.5 billion divided by the reset price of $26.35) multiplied by (ii) the difference between Citi's stock price on the commitment date ($29.06) and the reset price ($26.35). This reclassification resulted in a corresponding reduction of income available to common shareholders during the first quarter of 2009, reducing basic and diluted EPS by approximately 24 cents.

THE SUPERVISORY CAPITAL ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (SCAP)

        On May 7, 2009, the USG released the results of its Supervisory Capital Assessment Program (SCAP). The SCAP constituted a comprehensive capital assessment of the 19 largest U.S. financial institutions, including Citi.

        Based on the results of the USG's assessment under the SCAP, Citi will be required to increase its Tier 1 Common by an additional $5.5 billion, which the Company intends to accomplish by expanding its previously-announced Exchange Offer (as described above) from $27.5 billion to $33 billion, an action that will require no additional USG investment or conversion of USG preferred securities into Citi common stock.

        Pursuant to the SCAP, any financial institution that is required to augment its capital as a result of the SCAP must develop a capital plan, to be approved by the Federal Reserve Board in consultation with the FDIC, and will have six months to implement this plan. Capital plans must be submitted and approved by June 8, 2009 and the required capital increase must be established by November 9, 2009. Like other financial institutions, Citi's capital plan must consist of three main elements:

        In addition, as required by the SCAP, Citi, like other financial institutions required to augment their capital, will review its existing management and Board of Directors in


Table of Contents

order to assure that the leadership of the Company has sufficient expertise and ability to manage the risks presented by the current economic environment and maintain capacity on its balance sheet sufficient to continue prudent lending to meet the credit needs of the economy. This review must be completed by June 8, 2009.

LOSS-SHARING AGREEMENT

        On January 16, 2009, Citigroup issued preferred shares to the U.S. Treasury (UST) and the FDIC, and a warrant to the UST, in exchange for $301 billion of loss protection on a specified pool of Citigroup assets. Under the agreement, the Company will absorb the first $39.5 billion of losses plus 10% of the remaining losses incurred.

        The fair value of the preferred shares of $3.529 billion was recorded asPreferred stock; the fair value of the warrant of $88 million was recorded as a credit toAdditional paid-in capital at the time of issuance; and an asset related to the loss-sharing agreement of $3.617 billion was recorded inOther assets. See "TARP and Other Regulatory Programs—U.S. Government Loss-Sharing Agreement." The loss-sharing agreement is accounted for as an indemnification agreement and amortized on a straight line basis over five years for non-residential assets and 10 years for residential assets. Amortization expense of $171 million was recorded in the first quarter of 2009.

        The USG has a 120-day confirmation period to finalize the composition of the asset pool from the date that Citi submitted its revised asset pool. The revised asset pool was submitted by Citigroup on April 15, 2009 and, therefore, is expected to be finalized by the USG by August 13, 2009. The advisor to the USG has commenced its review of the assets. In addition, as a result of receipt of principal repayments and charge-offs, the total asset pool has declined by approximately $17 billion from the original $301 billion. Approximately $2.0 billion of losses on the asset pool were recorded in the first quarter of 2009, bringing the agreement-to-date losses to approximately $2.9 billion. See "TARP and Other Regulatory Programs—U.S. Government Loss-Sharing Agreement."


Table of Contents

ITEMS IMPACTING THE SECURITIES AND BANKING BUSINESS

Securities and Banking Significant Revenue Items and Risk Exposure

 
 Pretax Revenue
Marks
(in millions)
 Risk Exposure
(in billions)
 
 
 First Quarter 2009 Mar. 31,
2009
 Dec. 31,
2008
 %
Change
 

Sub-prime related direct exposures

 $(2,296)$10.2 $14.1  (28)%

Private Equity and equity investments

  (1,240) 8.5  11.3  (25)

CVA related to exposure to monoline insurers

  (1,090) N/A  N/A   

Alt-A Mortgages(1)

  (490) 12.5  12.6  (1)

Highly leveraged loans and financing commitments(2)

  (247) 9.5  10.0  (5)

Commercial Real Estate (CRE) positions(2)(3)

  (186) 36.1  37.5  (4)

Structured Investment Vehicles' (SIVs) Assets

  (47) 16.2  16.6  (2)

Auction Rate Securities (ARS) proprietary positions

  (23) 8.5  8.8  (3)

CVA on Citi debt liabilities under fair value option

  180  N/A  N/A   

CVA on derivatives positions, excluding monoline insurers

  2,738  N/A  N/A   
          

Subtotal

 $(2,701)         

Non-credit accretion on reclassified assets

  541          
          

Total significant revenue items

 $(2,160)         
          

(1)
Net of hedges.

(2)
Net of underwriting fees.

(3)
Excludes CRE positions that were included in the SIV portfolio.

Subprime-Related Direct Exposures

        During the first quarter of 2009, S&B recorded write-downs of $2.296 billion pretax, net of hedges, on its subprime-related direct exposures. The Company's remaining $10.2 billion in U.S. subprime net direct exposure in S&B at March 31, 2009 consisted of (i) approximately $8.5 billion of net exposures to the super senior tranches of CDOs, which are collateralized by asset-backed securities, derivatives on asset-backed securities or both, and (ii) approximately $1.7 billion of subprime-related exposures in its lending and structuring business. See "Exposure to U.S. Residential Real Estate in Securities and Banking" for a further discussion of such exposures and the associated losses recorded.

Private Equity and Equity Investments

        In the first quarter of 2009, Citi recognized pretax losses of $1.240 billion on private equity and equity investments, reflecting weakness in the developed global equities markets during the first quarter of 2009. The Company had $8.5 billion in private equity and equity investments securities at March 31, 2009, which decreased $2.8 billion from December 31, 2008.

Monoline Insurers Credit Valuation Adjustment (CVA)

        During the first quarter of 2009, Citigroup recorded a pretax loss on CVA of $1.090 billion on its exposure to monoline insurers. CVA is calculated by applying forward default probabilities, which are derived using the counterparty's current credit spread, to the expected exposure profile. The majority of the exposure relates to hedges on super senior subprime exposures that were executed with various monoline insurance companies. See "Direct Exposure to Monolines" for a further discussion.

Alt-A Mortgage Securities

        In the first quarter of 2009, Citigroup recorded pretax losses of approximately $490 million, net of hedges, on Alt-A mortgage securities held in S&B. For these purposes, Alt-A mortgage securities are non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) where (i) the underlying collateral has weighted average FICO scores between 680 and 720 or (ii) for instances where FICO scores are greater than 720, RMBS have 30% or less of the underlying collateral composed of full documentation loans.

        The Company had $12.5 billion in Alt-A mortgage securities at March 31, 2009, which decreased $136 million from December 31, 2008. Of the $12.5 billion, $1.5 billion was classified asTrading account assets, on which $79 million of fair value losses, net of hedging, was recorded in earnings, $0.4 billion was classified as available-for-sale (AFS) investments, and $10.6 billion was classified as held-to-maturity (HTM) investments, on which $411 million of losses was recorded in earnings due to credit impairments.

Highly Leveraged Loans and Financing Commitments

        The Company recorded pretax losses of $247 million on funded and unfunded highly leveraged finance exposures in the first quarter of 2009. Citigroup's exposure to highly leveraged financings totaled $9.5 billion at March 31, 2009 ($9.0 billion in funded and $0.5 billion in unfunded commitments), reflecting a decrease of $0.5 billion from December 31, 2008. See "Highly Leveraged Financing Transactions" for a further discussion.


Table of Contents

Commercial Real Estate (CRE)

        S&B's commercial real estate exposure is split into three categories: assets held at fair value; held to maturity/held for investment; and equity. During the first quarter of 2009, pretax losses of $186 million, net of hedges, were booked on exposures recorded at fair value. S&B had $36.1 billion in CRE positions at March 31, 2009, which decreased $1.4 billion from December 31, 2008. See "Exposure to Commercial Real Estate" for a further discussion.

Credit Valuation Adjustment on Citi's Debt Liabilities for Which Citi Has Elected the Fair Value Option

        Under SFAS 157, the Company is required to use its own-credit spreads in determining the current value for its derivative liabilities and all other liabilities for which it has elected the fair value option. When Citi's credit spreads widen (deteriorate), Citi recognizes a gain on these liabilities because the value of the liabilities has decreased. When Citi's credit spreads narrow (improve), Citi recognizes a loss on these liabilities because the value of the liabilities has increased.

        During the first quarter of 2009, the Company recorded a gain of approximately $180 million on its fair value option liabilities (excluding derivative liabilities) due to the widening of the Company's credit spreads.

Credit Valuation Adjustment on Derivative Positions, excluding Monoline insurers

        During the first quarter of 2009, Citigroup recorded a net gain of approximately $2.7 billion on its derivative positions primarily due to the widening of the Company's credit default swap spread. See "Citigroup Derivatives" for a further discussion.

Non-Credit Accretion on Reclassified Assets

        In the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company reclassified $33.3 billion of debt securities from trading securities to HTM investments, $4.7 billion of debt securities from trading securities to AFS, and $15.7 billion of loans from held-for-sale to held-for-investment. All assets were reclassified with an amortized cost equal to the fair value on the date of reclassification. The difference between the amortized cost basis and the expected principal cash flows is treated as a purchase discount and accreted into income over the remaining life of the security or loan. In the first quarter of 2009, the Company recognized approximately $541 million of interest revenue based on this accretion.

DIVESTITURES

Joint Venture with Morgan Stanley

        On January 13, 2009, Citi and Morgan Stanley (MS) announced a joint venture (JV) that will combine theGlobal Wealth Management platform of MS with the Smith Barney, Quilter and Australia private client networks. Citi will sell 100% of these businesses to Morgan Stanley in exchange for a 49% stake in the JV and an estimated $2.7 billion of cash at closing. At the time of the announcement, the estimated pretax gain was $9.5 billion ($5.8 billion after-tax), based on valuations performed at that time. Since the actual gain that will be recorded is dependent upon the value of the JV on the date the transaction closes, it may differ from the estimated amount. The transaction is anticipated to close no later than third quarter of 2009. It is anticipated that Citi will continue to support the clearing and settling of the JV activities for a period of between two to three years.

Sale of Citigroup Technology Services Ltd.

        On December 23, 2008, Citigroup announced an agreement with Wipro Limited to sell all of Citigroup's interest in Citi Technology Services Ltd., Citigroup's India-based captive provider of technology infrastructure support and application development, for all cash consideration of approximately $127 million. The transaction closed on January 20, 2009 and resulted in an after-tax loss of $6 million after reflecting an allocation of a portion of the proceeds to the Master Services Agreement.

Sale of Citi's Nikko Citi Trust and Banking Corporation

        On December 16, 2008, Citigroup executed a definitive agreement to sell all of the shares of Nikko Citi Trust and Banking Corporation to Mitsubishi UFJ Trust and Banking Corporation (MUTB). At the closing, MUTB is to pay all cash consideration of ¥25 billion, subject to certain purchase price adjustments. The closing is subject to regulatory approvals and other closing conditions. Citi's announcement on May 1, 2009 of the Nikko Cordial Securities transaction (as described under "Subsequent Event" below) and certain other developments affect the rights of the parties under the agreement with MUTB. As was announced on March 26, 2009, the parties have agreed to extend the closing of the transaction and a new closing date will be announced when determined.

OTHER ITEMS

Income Taxes

        The Company's effective tax rate was 32.8% in the first quarter of 2009, versus 42.9% in the prior-year period, which includes a tax benefit of $110 million relating to the conclusion of the audit of certain issues in the Company's 2003-2005 U.S. federal tax audit.

        The Company expects to conclude the audit of its U.S. federal consolidated income tax returns for the years 2003-2005 within the next 12 months. The gross uncertain tax position at March 31, 2009 for the items expected to be resolved is approximately $245 million plus gross interest of about $50 million. The potential net tax benefit to continuing operations could be approximately $225 million. This is in addition to the $110 million benefit booked in the first quarter of 2009 for issues already concluded, discussed above.

        The Company's net deferred tax asset of $44.5 billion at December 31, 2008 decreased by approximately $1 billion at March 31, 2009, principally due to $1 billion in compensation deductions under SFAS 123(R) which reduced additional paid-in capital in the first quarter of 2009. Although realization is not assured, the Company believes that the realization of the recognized net deferred tax asset at March 31, 2009 is more likely than not based upon expectations as to future taxable income in the jurisdictions in which it operates and available tax planning strategies.


Table of Contents

Sale of Redecard Shares

        In the first quarter of 2008,2009, Citigroup sold approximately 46.8 million Redecard shares, which decreased Citigroup's ownershipits entire 17% equity interest in Redecard from approximately 23.9% to approximately 17%. Anthrough a private and public offering. The sale resulted in an after-tax gain of $426$704 million ($661 million1.116 billion pretax) and was recorded in theInternationalGlobal Cards business.business inLatin America.

SupportSUBSEQUENT EVENT

Sale of Structured Investment Vehicles (SIVs)Nikko Cordial

        On December 13, 2007, the Company announced a commitment to provide support facilities to its Citi-advised Structured Investment Vehicles (SIVs) for the purpose of resolving the uncertainty regarding the SIVs' senior debt ratings. As a result of this commitment, the Company consolidated the SIVs' assets and liabilities onto Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet.

        On February 12, 2008, the Company finalized the terms of these support facilities, which take the form of a commitment to provide $3.5 billion of mezzanine capital to the SIVs. During March 2008, five of the six facilities were drawn in the aggregate amount of $3.4 billion.

        For the first quarter of 2008, the Company recorded pretax trading account losses of $212 million related to these consolidated SIVs. See page 54 for further discussion.

Banamex Legal Vehicle Reorganization

        During the first quarter of 2008, Banamex completed a legal vehicle reorganization. As a result,May 1, 2009, Citigroup recognized an operating expense reduction of $282 million, primarily inInternational Consumer.

Citi-Managed Fund Reserve

        In the first quarter of 2008, GWM offered to facilitate the liquidation of its clients' investments in the Falcon multi-strategy fixed income funds (Falcon Funds) that have been negatively affected by recent market stress in certain fixed income assets. As a result, GWM recorded a $250 million reserve to cover the estimated cost of these arrangements.

Write-down of Intangible Asset Related to Old Lane

        As a result of the Old Lane hedge fund notifying its investors that they will have the opportunity to redeem their investments, without restriction, effective July 31, 2008, CAI recorded a pretax write-down of $202 million during the first quarter of 2008 of intangible assets related to this multi-strategy hedge fund. In April 2008, substantially all unaffiliated investors had notified Old Lane of their intention to redeem their investments. See note 10 on page 74 for additional information.

Issuance of Preferred Stock

        During the first quarter of 2008, the Company enhanced its capital base by issuing $12.5 billion of 7% convertible preferred stock in a private offering, and $3.2 billion of 6.5% convertible preferred stock in public offerings, and $3.715 billion of 8.125% of non-convertible preferred stock in public offerings. See Note 12 on page 78 for further information.

Nikko Cordial

        Citigroup began consolidating Nikko Cordial's financial results and the related minority interest on May 9, 2007, when Nikko Cordial became a 61%-owned subsidiary. Citigroup later, in 2007, increased its ownership stake in Nikko Cordial to approximately 68%. Nikko Cordial results are included within Citigroup'sSecurities and Banking, Smith Barney and International Consumer businesses.

        On January 29, 2008, Citigroup acquired the remaining Nikko Cordial shares outstanding by issuing 175 million Citigroup common shares (approximately $4.4 billion based on the exchange terms) in a public transaction in exchange for those Nikko Cordial shares.

Acquisition of Banco de Chile's US Branches

        In 2007, Citigroup and Quiñenco entered intoreached a definitive agreement to establishsell its Japanese domestic securities business, conducted principally through Nikko Cordial Securities Inc., to Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation in a strategic partnership that combinestransaction with a total cash value to Citi of approximately $7.9 billion (¥774.5 billion). Citi's ownership interests in Nikko Citigroup operationsLimited, Nikko Asset Management Co., Ltd., and Nikko Principal Investments Japan Ltd. are not included in Chile with Banco de Chile's local banking franchise to create a banking and financial services institution with approximately 20% market share of the Chilean banking industry.transaction. The transaction closed on January 1, 2008.

        Under the agreement, Citigroup contributed Citigroup's Chilean operations and other assets, and acquired an approximate 32.96% stake in LQIF, a wholly owned subsidiaryis expected to generate approximately $2.5 billion of Quiñenco that controls Banco de Chile, and is accountedtangible common equity (TCE) for under the equity method of accounting. As part of the overall transaction, Citigroup also acquired the U.S. branches of Banco de Chile for approximately $130 million. Citigroup has entered into an agreementCiti at closing, with Citi expected to acquire an additional 17.04% stake in LQIF for approximately $1 billion within three years. The new partnership calls for active participation by Citigroup in the management of Banco de Chile including board representation at both LQIF and Banco de Chile.

Sale of CitiCapital

        On April 17, 2008, Citigroup signed an agreement to sell CitiCapital, the equipment finance unit in North America. The sale consists of net assets of approximately $13 billion and will result inrecognize an after-tax loss of approximately $325 million, subject to closing adjustments.$0.2 billion. On a pro forma basis, Citi's March 31, 2009 Tier 1 Capital Ratio would have increased by approximately 27 basis points. The loss will be recorded in the second quarter of 2008 and the saletransaction is expected to close in the third quarter of 2008.

Sale of Citi Street

        On May 2, 2008, Citigroup and State Street Corporation announced that they have entered into a definitive agreement to sell CitiStreet, a benefits servicing business, to ING Group in an all-cash transaction valued at $900 million. CitiStreet is a joint venture formed in 2000, which is owned 50 percent each by Citi and State Street. The acquisition is expected to close, pending customary closing conditions, by the end of the thirdfourth quarter of 2008. The sale will result in an after-tax gain of approximately $200 million to Citigroup,2009, subject to regulatory approvals and customary closing adjustments, which will be recorded at the time of closing.conditions.


Table of Contents


SEGMENT PRODUCT AND REGIONAL—NET INCOME (LOSS) AND REVENUEREVENUES

        The following tables show the net income (loss) and revenues for Citigroup's businesses on a segment and product view and onas well as a regional view:

Citigroup Net Income—Income (Loss)—Segment and Product View

 
 First Quarter
  
 
In millions of dollars

 % Change
 
 2008
 2007(1)
 
Global Consumer         
 U.S. Cards $595 $897 (34)%
 U.S. Retail Distribution  101  388 (74)
 U.S. Consumer Lending  (476) 359 NM 
 U.S. Commercial Business  59  81 (27)
  
 
 
 
  Total U.S. Consumer(2) $279 $1,725 (84)%
  
 
 
 
 International Cards $703 $388 81%
 International Consumer Finance  (168) 25 NM 
 International Retail Banking  728  540 35 
  
 
 
 
  Total International Consumer $1,263 $953 33%
  
 
 
 
 Other $(108)$(85)(27)%
  
 
 
 
  Total Global Consumer $1,434 $2,593 (45)%
  
 
 
 
Markets & Banking         
 Securities and Banking $(6,401)$2,211 NM 
 Transaction Services  732  449 63%
 Other  (2) 1 NM 
  
 
 
 
  Total Markets & Banking $(5,671)$2,661 NM 
  
 
 
 
Global Wealth Management         
 Smith Barney $142 $324 (56)%
 Private Bank  157  124 27 
  
 
 
 
  Total Global Wealth Management $299 $448 (33)%
  
 
 
 
Alternative Investments $(509) 222 NM 
Corporate/Other(3)  (664) (912)27%
  
 
 
 
Total Net Income (Loss) $(5,111)$5,012 NM 
  
 
 
 
 
 First Quarter  
 
 
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

Global Cards

          
 

North America

 $(209)$537  NM 
 

EMEA

  (65) 42  NM 
 

Latin America

  669  516  30%
 

Asia

  22  131  (83)
        
  

Total Global Cards

 $417 $1,226  (66)%
        

Consumer Banking

          
 

North America

 $(1,245)$(333) NM 
 

EMEA

  (178) (85) NM 
 

Latin America

  81  271  (70)%
 

Asia

  116  199  (42)
        
  

Total Consumer Banking

 $(1,226)$52  NM 
        

Institutional Clients Group (ICG)

          
 

North America

 $(135)$(5,955) 98%
 

EMEA

  2,019  (1,142) NM 
 

Latin America

  442  382  16 
 

Asia

  507  358  42 
        
  

Total ICG

 $2,833 $(6,357) NM 
        

Global Wealth Management (GWM)

          
 

North America

 $244 $165  48%
 

EMEA

  26  26   
 

Latin America

  (9) 26  NM 
 

Asia

    77  (100)
        
  

Total GWM

 $261 $294  (11)%
        

Corporate/Other

 $(675)$(462) (46)%
        

Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations

 $1,610 $(5,247) NM 

Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations

 $(33)$115  NM 

Net Income (Loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

 $(16)$(21)   
        

Citigroup's Net Income (Loss)

 $1,593 $(5,111) NM 
        

(1)
Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.

(2)
U.S. disclosure includes Canada and Puerto Rico.

(3)
The 2007 first quarter includes a $1,377 million ($871 million after-tax) Restructuring charge related to the Company's Structural Expense Initiatives project announced on April 11, 2007.

NM

Not meaningful


Table of Contents

Citigroup Net Income—Income (Loss)—Regional View

 
 First Quarter
  
 
In millions of dollars

 % Change
 
 2008
 2007
 
U.S.(1)         
 Global Consumer $171 $1,640 (90)%
 Markets & Banking  (5,444) 1,039 NM 
 Global Wealth Management  163  361 (55)
  
 
 
 
  TotalU.S $(5,110)$3,040 NM 
  
 
 
 
Mexico         
 Global Consumer $340 $372 (9)%
 Markets & Banking  101  114 (11)
 Global Wealth Management  12  12  
  
 
 
 
  TotalMexico $453 $498 (9)%
  
 
 
 
EMEA         
 Global Consumer $66 $83 (20)%
 Markets & Banking  (1,142) 694 NM 
 Global Wealth Management  26  7 NM 
  
 
 
 
  TotalEMEA $(1,050)$784 NM 
  
 
 
 
Japan         
 Global Consumer $(8)$45 NM 
 Markets & Banking  (145) 35 NM 
 Global Wealth Management  27    
  
 
 
 
  TotalJapan $(126)$80 NM 
  
 
 
 
Asia (Excluding Japan)         
 Global Consumer $370 $383 (3)%
 Markets & Banking  725  561 29 
 Global Wealth Management  56  65 (14)
  
 
 
 
  TotalAsia $1,151 $1,009 14%
  
 
 
 
Latin America         
 Global Consumer $495 $70 NM 
 Markets & Banking  234  218 7%
 Global Wealth Management  15  3 NM 
  
 
 
 
  TotalLatin America $744 $291 NM 
  
 
 
 
Alternative Investments $(509)$222 NM 
Corporate/Other  (664) (912)27%
  
 
 
 
Total Net Income (Loss) $(5,111)$5,012 NM 
  
 
 
 
Total International $1,172 $2,662 (56)%
  
 
 
 
 
 First Quarter  
 
 
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

North America

          
 

Global Cards

 $(209)$537  NM 
 

Consumer Banking

  (1,245) (333) NM 
 

ICG

  (135) (5,955) 98%
  

Securities & Banking

  (269) (6,034) 96 
  

Transaction Services

  134  79  70 
 

GWM

  244  165  48 
        
  

TotalNorth America

 $(1,345)$(5,586) 76%
        

EMEA

          
 

Global Cards

 $(65)$42  NM 
 

Consumer Banking

  (178) (85) NM 
 

ICG

  2,019  (1,142) NM 
  

Securities & Banking

  1,728  (1,364) NM 
  

Transaction Services

  291  222  31%
 

GWM

  26  26   
        
  

TotalEMEA

 $1,802 $(1,159) NM 
        

Latin America

          
 

Global Cards

 $669 $516  30%
 

Consumer Banking

  81  271  (70)
 

ICG

  442  382  16 
  

Securities & Banking

  294  250  18 
  

Transaction Services

  148  132  12 
 

GWM

  (9) 26  NM 
        
  

TotalLatin America

 $1,183 $1,195  (1)%
        

Asia

          
 

Global Cards

 $22 $131  (83)%
 

Consumer Banking

  116  199  (42)
 

ICG

  507  358  42 
  

Securities & Banking

  237  59  NM 
  

Transaction Services

  270  299  (10)
 

GWM

    77  (100)
        
  

TotalAsia

 $645 $765  (16)%
        

Corporate/Other

 $(675)$(462) (46)%

Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations

 $1,610 $(5,247) NM 

Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations

 $(33)$115  NM 

Net Income (Loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

 $(16)$(21)   
        

Citigroup's Net Income (Loss)

 $1,593 $(5,111) NM 
        

(1)
Excludes Alternative Investments and Corporate/Other, which are predominantly related to theU.S. TheU.S. regional disclosure includes Canada and Puerto Rico. Global Consumer for theU.S. includes Other Consumer.

(2)
The 2007 first quarter includes a $1,377 million ($871 million after-tax) restructuring charge related to the Company's Structural Expense Initiatives project announced on April 11, 2007.

NM

Not meaningful


Table of Contents

Citigroup Revenues—Segment and Product View

 
 First Quarter
  
 
In millions of dollars

 % Change
 
 2008
 2007(1)
 
Global Consumer         
 U.S. Cards $3,217 $3,294 (2)%
 U.S. Retail Distribution  2,656  2,426 9 
 U.S. Consumer Lending  1,710  1,551 10 
 U.S. Commercial Business  422  474 (11)
  
 
 
 
  Total U.S. Consumer(2) $8,005 $7,745 3%
  
 
 
 
 International Cards $3,053 $1,739 76%
 International Consumer Finance  809  890 (9)
 International Retail Banking  3,325  2,759 21 
  
 
 
 
  Total International Consumer $7,187 $5,388 33%
  
 
 
 
 Other $15 $4 NM 
  
 
 
 
  Total Global Consumer $15,207 $13,137 16%
  
 
 
 
Markets & Banking         
 Securities and Banking $(6,823)$7,277 NM 
 Transaction Services  2,347  1,650 42%
 Other    (1)100 
  
 
 
 
  Total Markets & Banking $(4,476)$8,926 NM 
  
 
 
 
Global Wealth Management         
 Smith Barney $2,643 $2,246 18%
 Private Bank  631  572 10 
  
 
 
 
  Total Global Wealth Management $3,274 $2,818 16%
  
 
 
 
Alternative Investments $(358)$562 NM 
Corporate/Other  (428) 16 NM 
  
 
 
 
Total Net Revenues $13,219 $25,459 (48)%
  
 
 
 
 
 First Quarter  
 
 
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

Global Cards

          
 

North America

 $2,775 $3,343  (17)%
 

EMEA

  492  585  (16)
 

Latin America

  1,950  1,776  10 
 

Asia

  548  675  (19)
        
  

Total Global Cards

 $5,765 $6,379  (10)%
        

Consumer Banking

          
 

North America

 $3,955 $4,485  (12)%
 

EMEA

  506  700  (28)
 

Latin America

  818  1,048  (22)
 

Asia

  1,123  1,558  (28)
        
  

Total Consumer Banking

 $6,402 $7,791  (18)%
        

Institutional Clients Group (ICG)

          
 

North America

 $2,095 $(7,824) NM 
 

EMEA

  4,597  133  NM 
 

Latin America

  1,129  1,012  12%
 

Asia

  1,686  1,721  (2)
        
  

Total ICG

 $9,507 $(4,958) NM 
        

Global Wealth Management (GWM)

          
 

North America

 $1,981 $2,376  (17)%
 

EMEA

  126  170  (26)
 

Latin America

  60  100  (40)
 

Asia

  452  633  (29)
        
  

Total GWM

 $2,619 $3,279  (20)%
        

Corporate/Other

 $496 $(50) NM 
        

Total Net Revenues

 $24,789 $12,441  99%
        

(1)
Reclassified to conform to the current periods presentation.

(2)
U.S. disclosure includes Canada and Puerto Rico.

NM

Not meaningful


Table of Contents

Citigroup Revenues—Regional View

 
 First Quarter
  
 
In millions of dollars

 % Change
 
 2008
 2007
 
U.S.(1)         
 Global Consumer $8,020 $7,749 3%
 Markets & Banking  (7,466) 3,683 NM 
 Global Wealth Management  2,377  2,385  
  
 
 
 
  TotalU.S $2,931 $13,817 (79)%
  
 
 
 
Mexico         
 Global Consumer $1,458 $1,377 6%
 Markets & Banking  203  227 (11)
 Global Wealth Management  37  36 3 
  
 
 
 
  TotalMexico $1,698 $1,640 4%
  
 
 
 
EMEA         
 Global Consumer $1,861 $1,446 29%
 Markets & Banking  133  2,827 (95)
 Global Wealth Management  170  108 57 
  
 
 
 
  TotalEMEA $2,164 $4,381 (51)%
  
 
 
 
Japan         
 Global Consumer $640 $615 4%
 Markets & Banking  202  212 (5)
 Global Wealth Management  415    
  
 
 
 
  TotalJapan $1,257 $827 52%
  
 
 
 
Asia         
 Global Consumer $1,691 $1,359 24%
 Markets & Banking  1,827  1,404 30 
 Global Wealth Management  212  234 (9)
  
 
 
 
  TotalAsia $3,730 $2,997 24%
  
 
 
 
Latin America         
 Global Consumer $1,537 $591 NM 
 Markets & Banking  625  573 9%
 Global Wealth Management  63  55 15 
  
 
 
 
  TotalLatin America $2,225 $1,219 83%
  
 
 
 
Alternative Investments $(358)$562 NM 
Corporate/Other  (428) 16 NM 
  
 
 
 
Total Net Revenues $13,219 $25,459 (48)%
  
 
 
 
Total International $11,074 $11,064  
  
 
 
 
 
 First Quarter  
 
 
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

North America

          
 

Global Cards

 $2,775 $3,343  (17)%
 

Consumer Banking

  3,955  4,485  (12)
 

ICG

  2,095  (7,824) NM 
  

Securities & Banking

  1,512  (8,317) NM 
  

Transaction Services

  583  493  18 
 

GWM

  1,981  2,376  (17)
        
  

TotalNorth America

 $10,806 $2,380  NM 
        

EMEA

          
 

Global Cards

 $492 $585  (16)%
 

Consumer Banking

  506  700  (28)
 

ICG

  4,597  133  NM 
  

Securities & Banking

  3,810  (680) NM 
  

Transaction Services

  787  813  (3)
 

GWM

  126  170  (26)
        
  

TotalEMEA

 $5,721 $1,588  NM 
        

Latin America

          
 

Global Cards

 $1,950 $1,776  10%
 

Consumer Banking

  818  1,048  (22)
 

ICG

  1,129  1,012  12 
  

Securities & Banking

  794  680  17 
  

Transaction Services

  335  332  1 
 

GWM

  60  100  (40)
        
  

TotalLatin America

 $3,957 $3,936  1%
        

Asia

          
 

Global Cards

 $548 $675  (19)%
 

Consumer Banking

  1,123  1,558  (28)
 

ICG

  1,686  1,721  (2)
  

Securities & Banking

  1,069  1,012  6 
  

Transaction Services

  617  709  (13)
 

GWM

  452  633  (29)
        
  

TotalAsia

 $3,809 $4,587  (17)%
        

Corporate/Other

 $496 $(50) NM 
        

Total Net Revenue

 $24,789 $12,441  99%
        

(1)
Excludes Alternative Investments and Corporate/Other, which are predominantly related to theU.S. TheU.S. regional disclosure includes Canada and Puerto Rico. Global Consumer for theU.S. includes Other Consumer.

NM

Not meaningful


Table of Contents


GLOBAL CONSUMERCARDS

 
 First Quarter  
 
 
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

Net interest revenue

 $2,672 $2,706  (1)%

Non-interest revenue

  3,093  3,673  (16)
        

Revenues, net of interest expense

 $5,765 $6,379  (10)%

Operating expenses

  2,196  2,595  (15)

Provision for credit losses and for benefits and claims

  3,093  1,891  64 
        

Income before taxes and noncontrolling interests

 $476 $1,893  (75)%

Income taxes

  58  664  (91)

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  1  3  (67)
        

Net income

 $417 $1,226  (66)%
        

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $107 $123  (13)%

Return on assets

  1.58% 4.01%   
        

Revenues, net of interest expense, by region:

          
 

North America

 $2,775 $3,343  (17)%
 

EMEA

  492  585  (16)
 

Latin America

  1,950  1,776  10 
 

Asia

  548  675  (19)
        

Total revenues

 $5,765 $6,379  (10)%
        

Net income (loss) by region:

          
 

North America

 $(209)$537  NM 
 

EMEA

  (65) 42  NM 
 

Latin America

  669  516  30%
 

Asia

  22  131  (83)
        

Total net income (loss)

 $417 $1,226  (66)%
        

Key Drivers(in billions of dollar, except accounts)

          

Average loans

 $83.0 $92.8  (11)%

Purchase sales

  86.2  106.8  (19)

Open accounts(in millions)

  170.5  186.0  (8)
        

NM    Not meaningful

1Q09 vs. 1Q08

        Citigroup's Global Consumer Group provides a wide array of banking, lending, insurance and investment services through a network of 8,441 branches, approximately 20,000 ATMs and 538 Automated Lending Machines (ALMs), the Internet, telephone and mail, and the Primerica Financial Services sales force. Global Consumer serves more than 200 million customer accounts, providing products and services to meet the financial needs of both individuals and small businesses.

 
 First Quarter
  
 
In millions of dollars

 %
Change

 
 2008
 2007
 
Net interest revenue $8,749 $7,676 14%
Non-interest revenue  6,458  5,461 18 
  
 
 
 
Revenues, net of interest expense $15,207 $13,137 16%
Operating expenses  7,515  6,744 11 
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims  5,756  2,695 NM 
  
 
 
 
Income before taxes and minority interest $1,936 $3,698 (48)%
Income taxes  493  1,095 (55)
Minority interest, net of taxes  9  10 (10)
  
 
 
 
Net income $1,434 $2,593 (45)%
  
 
 
 
Average assets(in billions of dollars) $739 $702 5%
Return on assets  0.78% 1.50%  
  
 
 
 
Key Indicators(in billions of dollars)         
Average loans $531.4 $461.8 15%
Average deposits  312.2  271.6 15 
Total branches  8,441  8,140 4 
  
 
 
 

NM
Not meaningful

U.S. CONSUMER

        U.S. Consumer is composed of four businesses:Cards Retail Distribution, Consumer Lending andrevenue decreased 10% primarily due to higher credit losses flowing through the securitization trusts inCommercial BusinessNorth America.

 
 First Quarter
  
 
In millions of dollars

 %
Change

 
 2008
 2007
 
Net interest revenue $4,353 $4,217 3%
Non-interest revenue  3,652  3,528 4 
  
 
 
 
Revenues, net of interest expense $8,005 $7,745 3%
Operating expenses  3,827  3,613 6 
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims  3,771  1,479 NM 
  
 
 
 
Income before taxes and minority interest $407 $2,653 (85)%
Income taxes  124  920 (87)
Minority interest, net of taxes  4  8 (50)
  
 
 
 
Net income $279 $1,725 (84)%
  
 
 
 
Average assets(in billions of dollars) $467 $492 (5)%
Return on assets  0.24% 1.42%  
  
 
 
 
Key Indicators(in billions of dollars)         
Average loans $367.2 $335.8 9%
Average deposits  122.6  117.4 4%
Total branches  3,569  3,488 2%
  
 
 
 

NM
Not meaningful

1Q08 vs. 1Q07

Net Interest Revenue was 3% higher1% lower than the prior year as growthdriven by lower average loans of 11%. The decline in average loans and depositswas primarily due to a 19% decline in purchase sales.Non-Interest Revenue decreased 16% primarily due to lower securitization results inNorth America, reflecting higher credit costs flowing through the securitization trusts. A $1.1 billion pretax gain on the sale of 9% and 4%, respectively,the Company's remaining stake in Redecard was partially offset by spread compression.

Non-Interest Revenue increased 4%, primarily due to 4% growth inCards purchase sales,a prior-year pretax gain on sale of Redecard of $663 million and a pretax gain on sale of Visa shares of $349 million, higher gains on sales of mortgage loans, and growth in net servicing revenues in$439 million.

        InConsumer LendingNorth America. This increase, a 17% revenue decline was partially offsetmainly driven by lower securitization revenues, inCards primarily reflectingwhich reflected the impact of higher credit losses in the securitization trusts as well asand the absence of a prior-year $161$349 million pretax gain on the sale of MasterCardVisa shares. Purchase sales were 18% lower than the prior year reflecting a continued decline in discretionary and non-discretionary consumer spending.

        Outside ofNorth America, revenues decreased by 16% and 19% inEMEA andAsia, respectively, and increased by 10% inLatin America. The decreases inEMEA andAsia were driven by changes in foreign currency translation (generally referred to throughout this report as "FX translation") related to strengthening of the U.S. dollar, and declines in purchase sales inEMEA andLatin America. WhileLatin America purchase sales also declined, the pretax gain on sale of Redecard affectedLatin America in the current period by $1.1 billion, and by $663 million in the prior-year period. The prior-year period also included pretax gains related to Visa shares of $10 million inLatin America and $81 million inAsia.

        Operating expenseexpenses growth of 6% wasdecreased 15% primarily driven by adue to lower marketing costs, lower business volumes, restructuring efforts and prior-year repositioning charge of $130 million, volume growth, higher collection costs, acquisitions, and investment spending related to the 176 new branch openings during the past twelve months (99 in CitiFinancial and 77 in Citibank). This increase wascharges, which were partially offset by higher credit management costs, the absence of a prior-year pretax Visa-related litigation reserve release of $159 million reductionand a legal vehicle restructuring. Expenses decreased by 11% inNorth America, 27% inEMEA, 18% inLatin America, and 21% inAsia. Outside ofNorth America, FX translation also contributed to the Visa-related litigation reserve.decrease in expenses.

        Provisions for loancredit losses and for benefits and claims increased $2.3$1.202 billion, primarily reflecting increases of $695 million in net credit losses and $485 million in higher loan loss reserve builds. InNorth America, credit costs increased $840 million, driven by higher net credit losses, up $498 million or


Table of Contents

81%, and a higher loan loss reserve build, up $342 million. Higher credit costs reflected a weakening of leading credit indicators, including higher delinquencies on first and second mortgages, unsecured personal loans, credit cards and auto loans. Credit costs also increased due to trends in the U.S. macro-economic environment, including the housing market downturn, and rising unemployment rates, as well as portfolio growth.trends and higher bankruptcy filings, and the continued acceleration in the rate at which delinquent customers advanced to write-off. The net credit loss ratio increased 109by 503 basis points to 2.39%10.42%.


INTERNATIONAL CONSUMER

        International Consumer is composedOutside of three businesses:CardsNorth America, credit costs increased by $261 million and $110 million inConsumer FinanceEMEA andRetail BankingAsia, respectively, and decreased by $31 million inLatin America. International Consumer operatesNet credit losses were up $94 million, $61 million and $42 million in five geographies:MexicoEMEA,Latin America,EMEA,Japan, andAsia., respectively. Also contributing to the increase were higher loan loss reserve builds, which were up $143 million.

 
 First Quarter
  
 
In millions of dollars

 %
Change

 
 2008
 2007
 
Net interest revenue $4,433 $3,489 27%
Non-interest revenue  2,754  1,899 45 
  
 
 
 
Revenues, net of interest expense $7,187 $5,388 33%
Operating expenses  3,521  2,976 18 
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims  1,985  1,216 63 
  
 
 
 
Income before taxes and minority interest $1,681 $1,196 41%
Income taxes  413  241 71 
Minority interest, net of taxes  5  2 NM 
  
 
 
 
Net income $1,263 $953 33%
  
 
 
 
Revenues, net of interest expense, by region:         
 Mexico $1,458 $1,377 6%
 EMEA  1,861  1,446 29 
 Japan—Cards and Retail Banking  334  181 85 
 Asia  1,691  1,359 24 
 Latin America  1,537  591 NM 
  
 
 
 
Subtotal $6,881 $4,954 39%
 Japan Consumer Finance $306 $434 (29)
  
 
 
 
Total revenues $7,187 $5,388 33%
  
 
 
 
Net income by region         
 Mexico $340 $372 (9)%
 EMEA  66  83 (20)
 Japan—Cards and Retail Banking  61  36 69 
 Asia  370  383 (3)
 Latin America  495  70 NM 
  
 
 
 
Subtotal $1,332 $944 41%
 Japan Consumer Finance  (69) 9 NM 
  
 
 
 
Total net income $1,263 $953 33%
  
 
 
 
Average assets(in billions of dollars) $260 $199 31%
Return on assets  1.95% 1.94%  
  
 
 
 
Key indicators(in billions of dollars)         
Average loans $164.2 $126.0 30%
Average deposits  189.6  154.2 23 
EOP AUMs $163.6 $138.5 18 
Total branches  4,872  4,652 5 
  
 
 
 

        On December 18, 2008, the federal banking regulators adopted final rules under the Federal Truth-in-Lending Act and the Federal Trade Commission Act which represent a substantial overhaul of credit card disclosure rules and lender practices. These rules take effect July 1, 2010 and could have an adverse impact on theGlobal Cards business. Subsequent to March 31, 2009, the U.S. House of Representatives and the Senate have proposed additional legislation regarding credit card disclosures and practices. These bills, if passed, may further impact the U.S. credit card business.


Table of Contents


CONSUMER BANKING

 
 First Quarter  
 
 
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

Net interest revenue

 $4,845 $5,651  (14)%

Non-interest revenue

  1,557  2,140  (27)
        

Revenues, net of interest expense

 $6,402 $7,791  (18)%

Operating expenses

  3,536  4,309  (18)

Provision for credit losses and for benefits and claims

  5,213  3,643  43 
        

Income (loss) before taxes and noncontrolling interests

 $(2,347)$(161) NM 

Income taxes benefits

  (1,126) (215) NM 

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

  5  2  NM 
        

Net income (loss)

 $(1,226)$52  NM 
        

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $477 $568  (16)%

Return on assets

  (1.04)% 0.04%   
        

Revenues, net of interest expense, by region:

          
 

North America

 $3,955 $4,485  (12)%
 

EMEA

  506  700  (28)
 

Latin America

  818  1,048  (22)
 

Asia

  1,123  1,558  (28)
        

Total revenues

 $6,402 $7,791  (18)%
        

Net income (loss) by region:

          
 

North America

 $(1,245)$(333) NM 
 

EMEA

  (178) (85) NM 
 

Latin America

  81  271  (70)%
 

Asia

  116  199  (42)
        

Total net income (loss)

 $(1,226)$52  NM 
        

Consumer Finance Japan (CFJ)—NIR

 $162 $264  (39)%

Consumer Banking, excluding CFJ—NIR

 $4,683 $5,387  (13)%
        

CFJ—Operating expenses

 $59 $95  (38)%

Consumer Banking, excluding CFJ-operating expenses

 $3,477 $4,214  (17)%
        

CFJ—Net loss

 $(36)$(86) 58%

Consumer Banking, excluding CFJ—Net income (loss)

 $(1,190)$138  NM 
        

Key Indicators

          

Average loans(in billions of dollars)

 $366.2 $407.7  (10)%

Average deposits(in billions of dollars)

 $267.7 $297.8  (10)

Accounts(in millions)

  77.0  80.1  (4)

Branches

  7,310  8,160  (10)
        

NM

Not meaningful

1Q081Q09 vs. 1Q071Q08

        Consumer Banking revenue declined 18% driven by a 42% decline in investment sales, lower volumes and spread compression. A general slowdown in the global capital markets drove the decline in investment sales.Net interest revenue was 14% lower than the prior year with average loans and deposits both down 10%, and net interest margin decreasing as well.Non-interest revenue declined 27%, primarily due to the decline in investment sales. The impact of FX translation also contributed to the overall decline in revenue.

        InNorth America, revenues declined 12% primarily due to lower volumes and spread compression.Net Interest Revenue increased 27%,was 7% lower than the prior-year period, primarily driven by 30% growth in averagelower loan volumes and spread compression due largely to higher non-accrual loans and 23% growthlower interest rates on loan modifications. Average loans were down 8% while deposits increased by 4% compared with the prior-year period. The decrease in average deposits, including the impact of the acquisitions of Grupo Financiero Uno, Egg, Grupo Cuscatlan, and Bank of Overseas Chinese. The impact of foreign currency translation also contributedloan volume was mainly due to the increasea reduction in revenues.residential real estate loans.

Non-Interest Revenue increased 45%declined 24%, primarilymainly driven by higher run-off of the servicing portfolio due to mortgage refinancing, a $663 million gain on Redecard shares47% decline in investment sales, and a $97 million gain on the Initial Public Offering (IPO)absence of Visa shares, partially offset by a gain of $107 milliongains on the sale of MasterCard sharesassets in the prior-year period. The increase is alsoRevenues inEMEA declined 28% as investment sales and assets under management declined 64% and 49%, respectively, mainly due to adverse market conditions. Average loans were down 21% due to tighter underwriting criteria, the exiting from certain markets, and the impact of FX translation. Average deposits were down 35%, reflecting a decline in balances in the UK as customers aligned deposits with government insurance programs and the impact of FX translation. Revenue inLatin America declined 22% and average loans and deposits were down 7% and 19%, respectively, due to the impact of FX translation. InAsia, revenues declined 28% driven by a 41% increase in Cards purchase sales, a 14% increasesignificant decline in investment AUMs,revenues, reflecting a continued decline in equity markets across the region. Average loans and acquisitions, (including Nikko Cordial.)deposits declined 19% and 15%, respectively, mainly due to the impact of FX translation.

        Operating expenses increased bydeclined 18%, reflecting acquisitions, higher business volumethe benefits from re-engineering efforts and the impact of FX translation. The prior-year period also included a repositioning charge of $106$221 million partially offset by a $257 millionexpense benefit related to a legal vehicle restructuring in Mexico.


Table of Contents

In North America, Expenses were 14% lower than the prior-year period, with benefits from re-engineering efforts and the absence of a $126 million repositioning charge in the prior-year period being partially offset by higher collection and credit-related expenses. InEMEA, expenses were 40% lower than the prior-year period due to benefits of re-engineering efforts, the impact of FX translation and the absence of a $71 million repositioning charge in the prior-year period. InLatin America, expenses were 5% higher due to the absence of a $221 million expense benefit related to a legal vehicle restructuring, partially offset by the benefits of reengineering efforts and the impact of FX translation. InAsia, expenses were 26% lower than the prior-year period due to the benefits of re-engineering efforts including Consumer Finance Japan (CFJ).

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims increased $1.6 billion or 43% mainly due to higher net credit losses inNorth America residential real estate. The $1.2 billion net loan loss reserve build in the first quarter reflected the continued weakening of leading credit indicators, including a continued rise in delinquencies.

Credit costs inNorth America increased 51%, due to higher net credit losses, up 88% or $1.4 billion, and a $989 million net loan loss reserve build, driven primarily by residential real estate. The loan loss reserve build was $44 million lower than the prior-year period. Credit costs reflected a continued weakening of leading credit indicators, including a continued rise in delinquencies in first and second mortgages, personal, and commercial loans. Credit costs also reflected trends in the macro-economic environment, including the housing market downturn. The net credit loss ratio increased 213 basis points to 4.15%.

        InEMEA, credit costs nearly doubled as a result of higher net credit losses and an incremental net loan loss reserve build of $100 million. Higher credit costs reflected continued credit deterioration, particularly in Spain, Greece and the UK. The net credit loss ratio increased 256 basis points to 5.11%. InLatin America, credit costs increased 15% due to a $20 million incremental net loan loss reserve build. The net credit loss ratio increased 32 basis points to 4.10%. InAsia, credit costs were down slightly as higher net credit losses, mainly in India, were offset by a net loan loss reserve release in CFJ.


Table of Contents


INSTITUTIONAL CLIENTS GROUP (ICG)

 
 First Quarter  
 
 
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

Net interest revenue

 $5,348 $4,303 24%

Non-interest revenue

  4,159  (9,261)NM 
        

Revenues, net of interest expense

 $9,507 $(4,958)NM 

Operating expenses

  3,965  5,970 (34)%

Provision for credit losses and for benefits and claims

  1,889  297 NM 
        

Income (loss) before taxes and noncontrolling interests

 $3,653 $(11,225)NM 

Income taxes (benefits)

  841  (4,832)NM 

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests

  (21) (36)42%
        

Net income (loss)

 $2,833 $(6,357)NM 
        

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $1,062 $1,440 (26)%
        

Revenues, net of interest expense, by region:

         
 

North America

 $2,095 $(7,824)NM 
 

EMEA

  4,597  133 NM 
 

Latin America

  1,129  1,012 12%
 

Asia

  1,686  1,721 (2)
        

Total revenues

 $9,507 $(4,958)NM 
        

Net income (loss) by region:

         
 

North America

 $(135)$(5,955)98%
 

EMEA

  2,019  (1,142)NM 
 

Latin America

  442  382 16 
 

Asia

  507  358 42 
        

Total net income (loss)

 $2,833 $(6,357)NM 
        

Total net income (loss) by product:

         
 

Securities and Banking

 $1,990 $(7,089)NM 
 

Transaction Services

  843  732 15%
        

Total net income (loss)

 $2,833 $(6,357)NM 
        

Securities and Banking

         
 

Revenue details

         
 

Net Investment Banking

 $1,219 $(1,667)NM 
 

Lending

  (364) 584 NM 
 

Equity markets

  1,903  979 94%
 

Fixed income markets

  4,688  (7,023)NM 
 

Other Securities and Banking

  (261) (178)(47)
        

Total Securities and Banking Revenues

 $7,185 $(7,305)NM 

Transaction Services

  2,322  2,347 (1)%
        

Total revenues

 $9,507 $(4,958)NM 
        

NM    Not meaningful

1Q09 vs. 1Q08

Revenues, net of interest expense, were $7.2 billion in S&B mainly due to $4.7 billion of fixed income markets revenues reflecting strong trading results. Included in fixed income markets revenues is a $2.5 billion positive credit value adjustment (CVA) on derivative positions, excluding monolines and Citi debt liabilities, offset partially by $2.3 billion of net write-downs on subprime-related direct exposures, $1.2 billion in private equity and equity investment losses and $1.1 billion downward CVA related to exposure to monoline insurers and other revenue write-downs and losses detailed under "Items Impacting the Securities and Banking Business." Also included in S&B is $1.9 billion in equity markets revenues, primarily driven by derivatives, convertibles and equity trading, and $1.2 billion of net investment banking revenues mainly from debt underwriting. Revenue growth was offset partially by lending revenues of negative $364 million driven by losses on credit default swap hedges and $247 million of net write-downs and impairments on highly leveraged finance commitments. Transaction Services revenues declined 1% to $2.3 billion and average deposits and other customer liability balances declined 2%. Growth in both revenues and deposits, driven by double-digit revenue growth inNorth America and strong growth inEMEA, was more than offset by the impact of FX translation. Assets under custody declined 20% largely due to declining equity markets.

Operating expenses decreased 39% in S&B and included a $250 million litigation reserve release. The prior-year period included a $202 million write-down of the Old Lane intangible asset and $305 million of repositioning charges. Excluding these items from both periods, expenses declined 25%, driven by lower compensation due to headcount reductions and benefits from re-engineering and expense management. Transaction Services expenses declined 15%, driven by headcount reductions and re-engineering benefits, as well as the impact of FX translation.


Table of Contents

        Theprovision for credit losses in S&B increased significantly to $1.8 billion. Net credit losses were up $1.4 billion mainly due to the write-off of LyondellBasell. The $306 million net loan loss reserve build was driven by a $1.2 billion build for specific counterparties and a $506 million build to reflect a general weakening in the corporate credit environment, largely offset by a $1.4 billion release for specific counterparties, mainly LyondellBasell.


Table of Contents


GLOBAL WEALTH MANAGEMENT

 
 First Quarter  
 
 
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

Net interest revenue

 $698 $570  22%

Non-interest revenue

  1,921  2,709  (29)
        

Revenues, net of interest expense

 $2,619 $3,279  (20)%

Operating expenses

  2,101  2,796  (25)

Provision for credit losses and for benefits and claims

  112  21  NM 
        

Income before taxes and noncontrolling interest

 $406 $462  (12)%

Income taxes

  145  159  (9)

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

    9  (100)
        

Net income

 $261 $294  (11)%
        

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $93 $107  (13)%

Return on assets

  1.30% 2.00%   
        

Revenues, net of interest expense, by region:

          
 

North America

 $1,981 $2,376  (17)%
 

EMEA

  126  170  (26)
 

Latin America

  60  100  (40)
 

Asia

  452  633  (29)
        

Total revenues

 $2,619 $3,279  (20)%
        

Net income (loss) by region:

          
 

North America

 $244 $165  48%
 

EMEA

  26  26   
 

Latin America

  (9) 26  NM 
 

Asia

    77  (100)
        

Total net income

 $261 $294  (11)%
        

Key Indicators(in billions of dollars, except for offices)

          

Average loans

 $53 $64  (17)%

Average deposits and other customer liability balances

 $117 $132  (11)

Offices

  777  859  (10)

Total client assets

 $1,196 $1,707  (30)

Clients assets under fee-based management

 $293 $481  (39)
        

NM    Not meaningful

1Q09 vs. 1Q08

Revenues, net of interest expense, decreased 20% primarily due to lower investment management fees and the impact of lower client transactional activity, partially offset by higher banking revenues, driven by the bank deposit program and a higher net interest margin inNorth America. The impact of foreign currency translationmarket conditions on capital markets revenue was the main driver of decreased revenues inAsia. Other drivers of theInternational revenue decline included lower management fees and lower banking revenue.

Total client assets, including assets under fee-based management, decreased $511 billion, or 30%, mainly reflecting the impact of market declines over the past year. Net outflows of $40 billion in the quarter resulted from financial advisor attrition and client diversification. GWMhad 12,659 financial advisors/bankers as of March 31, 2009, compared with 15,241 as of March 31, 2008. The decline in advisors was weighted towards the lower end of the performance scale in North America, consistent with previously announced compensation plans, and also contributedreflected the elimination of low performing bankers and advisors in Asia.

Operating expenses decreased 25% primarily due to lower compensation costs and continued expense management. Lower expenses also reflect the absence of a first quarter 2008 reserve of $250 million related to an offer to facilitate the liquidation of investments in a Citi-managed fund for its clients.

        Theprovision for credit losses increased by $91 million, reflecting higher reserve builds of $83 million and increased net credit losses of $8 million. The reserve builds and net credit losses in the 2009 first quarter reflect the impact on clients of deteriorating financial and real estate markets. The reserve builds were mainly inNorth America for statistical builds (primarily related to residential real estate), SFAS 114 impaired loans and lending to address client liquidity needs related to auction rate securities holdings.


Table of Contents


CORPORATE/OTHER

 
 First Quarter 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

Net interest revenue

 $(665)$(162)

Non-interest revenue

  1,161  112 
      

Revenues, net of interest expense

 $496 $(50)

Operating expense

  289  105 
      

(Loss) from continuing operations before taxes

 $207 $(155)

Noncontrolling interests intersegment elimination

  16  21 

Income taxes

  867  286 
      

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $(675)$(462)

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

  (33) 115 
      

Net Income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests

 $(708)$(347)

Net Income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  (16) (21)
      

Citigroup's Net income (loss)

 $(692)$(326)
      

1Q09 vs. 1Q08

Revenues, net of interest expense, increased primarily driven by hedging activities and the impact of changes in U.S. dollar rates.

Operating Expenses increased primarily due to the increase$171 million amortization of the cost of the loss-sharing agreement with the USG.

Income Tax reflects higher taxes held at Corporate.


Table of Contents


REGIONAL DISCUSSIONS

        The following are the four regions in which Citigroup operates. The regional results are fully reflected in the previous segment discussions.

NORTH AMERICA

 
 First Quarter  
 
 
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

Net interest revenue

 $7,840 $6,691  17%

Non-interest revenue

  2,966  (4,311) NM 
        

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $10,806 $2,380  NM 

Total operating expenses

  6,343  8,277  (23)%

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

  7,205  3,889  85 
        

Loss before taxes and noncontrolling interests

 $(2,742)$(9,786) 72%

Income benefits

  (1,382) (4,165) 67 

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests

  (15) (35) 57 
        

Net loss

 $(1,345)$(5,586) 76%
        

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $1,021 $1,289  (21)%

Return on assets

  (0.53)% (1.74)%   
        

Key Drivers(in billions of dollars, except branches)

          

Average Loans

 $422.5 $442.3  (4)%

Average Consumer Banking Loans

 $283.3 $307.2  (8)

Average deposits (and other consumer liability balances)

 $281.4 $263.7  7 

Branches/offices

  3,955  4,251  (7)
        

NM    Not meaningful

1Q09 vs. 1Q08

Revenues, net of interest expense, increased $8.4 billion driven by significant fixed income market revenues inS&B, which reflected strong trading results and lower net write-downs. Included in fixed income market revenues is a positive credit value adjustment (CVA) on derivative positions, excluding monolines and Citi liabilities, offset partially by net write-downs on subprime-related direct exposures, private equity and equity investment losses, and a downward CVA related to exposure to monoline insurers and other revenue write-downs and losses detailed under "Items Impacting the Securities and Banking Business."

        InGlobal Cards, a 17% revenue decline was mainly driven by lower securitization revenues, which reflected the impact of higher credit losses in the securitization trusts and the absence of a $349 million pretax gain on the sale of Visa shares. Purchase sales were 18% lower than the prior year reflecting a confined decline in discretionary and non-discretionary consumer spending.

        InConsumer Banking, revenues declined 12% primarily due to lower volumes and spread compression.Net Interest Revenue was 7% lower than the prior-year period, primarily driven by lower loan volumes and spread compression due largely to higher non-accrual loans and lower interest rates on loan modifications. Average loans were down 8% while deposits increased by 4% compared with the prior-year period. The decrease in loan volume was mainly due to a reduction in residential real estate loans.Non-Interest Revenue declined 24%, mainly driven by higher run-off of the servicing portfolio due to mortgage refinancing, a 47% decline in investment sales, and the absence of gains on the sale of assets in the prior-year period.

        InGWM, revenues decreased 17% primarily due to lower investment management fees and the impact of lower client transactional activity, partially offset by higher banking revenues, driven by the bank deposit program and a higher net interest margin.

Operating expenses decreased 23%, primarily due to lower marketing costs, lower business volumes, restructuring efforts and prior-year repositioning charges, which were partially offset by higher credit management costs, the absence of a prior-year pretax Visa-related litigation reserve release and legal vehicle restructuring. Offsetting the decreases were higher collection and credit-related expenses.

        Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased 63%85%.Consumer Banking credit costs increased 51% mainly due to a $1.4 billion increase in net credit losses.Global Cards credit costs increased 91%, primarilydue to an increase of $498 million in net credit losses and an increase in reserve builds of $342 million.ICG increased $1.0 billion, mainly due to $1.1 billion increase in net credit losses.


Table of Contents

EMEA

 
 First Quarter  
 
 
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

Net interest revenue

 $2,031 $2,104  (3)%

Non-interest revenue

  3,690  (516) NM 
        

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $5,721 $1,588  NM 

Total operating expenses

  1,936  3,072  (37)%

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

  1,227  456  NM 
        

Income (loss) before taxes and noncontrolling interests

 $2,558 $(1,940) NM 

Income taxes (benefits)

  755  (802) NM 

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

  1  21  (95)%
        

Net income (loss)

 $1,802 $(1,159) NM 
        

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $286 $432  (34)%

Return on assets

  2.56% (1.08)%   
        

Key Drivers(in billions of dollars, except branches)

          

Average Loans

 $91.5 $123.2  (26)%

Average Consumer Banking Loans

 $19.9 $25.1  (21)

Average deposits (and other consumer liability balances)

 $135.4 $163.0  (17)

Branches/offices

  730  842  (13)
        

NM    Not meaningful

1Q09 vs. 1Q08

Revenues increased to $5.7 billion largely driven by MexicoS&B. Revenues inGlobal Cards and India, as well asConsumer Banking decreased by acquisitions16% and portfolio growth.

        In Japan Consumer Finance, a net loss of $69 million reflected28% respectively, driven by continued deterioration in the difficult operatingmarket environment and the ongoingnegative impact of consumer lending laws passedFX translation.

        InICG, S&B had record revenues, based on significant contributions across all products, and in particular Rates & Currencies which benefited from high volatility and wide-spreads. The first quarter of 2008 included write-downs in subprime-related losses of $1.4 billion and $0.6 billion in commercial real estate and highly leveraged finance commitments. The current quarter included $0.6 billion of CVA on derivatives, which is now reported within the region. Transaction Services revenues decreased 3% largely due to a decline in customer liability balances, down 8%, and headwinds from FX translation and interest rates.

        Revenues inGWM declined by 26% due to lower capital markets and investment activity, FX translation impact and reduction in loan balances and customer deposits. Average loans declined 30% due to client pay-downs and active asset management, while client assets under fee-based management decreased 40% primarily due to lower market values and FX translation impact.

Operating Expenses were down 37% from the first quarter of 2008 driven by lower headcount and continued benefits from re-engineering efforts, the favorable impact of FX translation, lower incentive compensation and repositioning charges.

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claimsincreased by $771 million from the first quarter of 2008 due to ongoing deterioration in market conditions, predominantly in the fourth quarter 2006.UK, Spain and Greece, and losses associated with loan sales in ICG.


MARKETS & BANKINGTable of Contents

        Markets &LATIN AMERICA

 
 First Quarter  
 
 
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

Net interest revenue

 $1,597 $2,015  (21)%

Non-interest revenue

  2,360  1921  23 
        

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $3,957 $3,936  1%

Total operating expenses

  1,345  1,487  (10)

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

  887  781  14 
        

Income before taxes and noncontrolling interests

 $1,725 $1,668  3%

Income taxes

  541  472  15 

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

  1  1   
        

Net income

 $1,183 $1,195  (1)%
        

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $130 $153  (15)%

Return on assets

  3.69% 3.14%   
        

Key Drivers(in billions of dollars, except branches)

          

Average Loans

 $49.9 $60.3  (17)%

Average Consumer Banking Loans

  13.6  14.6  (7)

Average deposits (and other consumer liability balances)

 $56.2 $70.4  (20)

Branches/offices

  2,450  2,645  (7)
        

1Q09 vs. 1Q08

Revenues increased 1% over the prior year, with strong trading results and one-time gains mostly offset by the impact of FX translation across the region and unfavorable market conditions during the quarter.Global Cards revenue grew 10%, driven by the $1.1 billion gain on the sale of Redecard shares in the first quarter of 2009, offset partially by the prior-year $663 million gain on sale of Redecard shares.Consumer Banking provides revenue decreased 22% driven by a broad range of7% decline in average loans, a 19% decline in average deposits, and lower investment sales and assets under management.ICG revenue increased 12%, mostly due to S&B revenues being 17% higher, driven by stronger fixed income trading results, offset partially by declines in investment banking and commercial lending productslending. Transaction Services revenues were up 1% with stronger trade services performance due to higher spreads mostly offset by weakness in the securities and funds services to companies, governments, institutions and investors in approximately 100 countries. Markets & Banking includesbusiness.Securities and Banking,Transaction ServicesGWM and Other.

 
 First Quarter
  
 
In millions of dollars

 %
Change

 
 2008
 2007
 
Net interest revenue $4,356 $2,462 77%
Non-interest revenue  (8,832) 6,464 NM 
  
 
 
 
Revenues, net of interest expense $(4,476)$8,926 NM 
Operating expenses  5,298  5,127 3%
Provision for credit losses  249  254 (2)
  
 
 
 
Income (loss) before taxes and minority interest $(10,023)$3,545 NM 
Income taxes (benefits)  (4,367) 869 NM 
Minority interest, net of taxes  15  15  
  
 
 
 
Net income (loss) $(5,671)$2,661 NM 
  
 
 
 
Revenues, net of interest expense, by region:         
 U.S $(7,466)$3,683 NM 
 Mexico  203  227 (11)%
 EMEA  133  2,827 (95)
 Japan  202  212 (5)
 Asia  1,827  1,404 30 
 Latin America  625  573 9 
  
 
 
 
Total revenues $(4,476)$8,926 NM 
  
 
 
 
Total revenues, net of interest expense by product:         
Securities and Banking $(6,823)$7,277 NM 
Transaction Services  2,347  1,650 42%
Other    (1)100 
  
 
 
 
Total revenues $(4,476)$8,926 NM 
  
 
 
 
Net income (loss) by region:         
 U.S $(5,444)$1,039 NM 
 Mexico  101  114 (11)
 EMEA  (1,142) 694 NM 
 Japan  (145) 35 NM 
 Asia  725  561 29 
 Latin America  234  218 7 
  
 
 
 
Total net income (loss) $(5,671)$2,661 NM 
  
 
 
 
Total net income (loss) by product:         
Securities and Banking $(6,401)$2,211 NM 
Transaction Services  732  449 63%
Other  (2) 1 NM 
  
 
 
 
Total net income(loss) $(5,671)$2,661 NM 
  
 
 
 

NM
Not meaningful

1Q08 vs. 1Q07

Revenues, net of interest expense, were negative inSecurities and Banking due to substantial write-downs and losses related to the fixed income and credit markets. Included in these losses are $6.0 billion of write-downs on subprime-related direct exposure, $3.1 billion of write-downs (net of underwriting fees) on funded and unfunded highly leveraged finance commitments, $1.5 billion of downward credit market value adjustments related to exposure to monoline insurers, and $1.5 billion of write-downs on auction rate securities inventory due to failed auctions and deteriorationrevenue fell 40% driven by decreases in the credit markets.Transaction Services revenues grew a record 42%, with records in all threeinvestments, capital markets, and banking businesses (cash management, securities services and trade) driven by strong growth in customer liability balances and assets under custody.reflecting the impact of market conditions.

        Operating expenses increaseddecreased 10% from the prior-year quarter mainly due toTransaction Services' increased business volumes and re-engineering efforts which resulted in significant savings in addition to the acquisition of The Bisys Group. Expenses decreased inSecurities and Bankingbenefit from a decline in incentive compensation costs,FX translation, partially offset by a $295$282 million repositioning charge.

        Theprovision for credit losses decreased, due primarilybenefit related to the absence of a $290 million net charge to increase loan loss reserveslegal vehicle restructuring in Mexico in the prior-year period, offset by an increase in net credit losses of $123 million and a $157 million incremental charge to increase loan loss reserves for specific counterparties.


GLOBAL WEALTH MANAGEMENT

        Global Wealth Management is composed of theSmith Barney Private Client businesses (including Citigroup Wealth Advisors, Nikko Cordial, Quilter and the Citicorp Investment Services business), CitiPrivate Bank and Citi Investment Research.

 
 First Quarter
  
 
In millions of dollars

 %
Change

 
 2008
 2007
 
Net interest revenue $571 $529 8%
Non-interest revenue  2,703  2,289 18 
  
 
 
 
Revenues, net of interest expense $3,274 $2,818 16%
Operating expenses  2,780  2,102 32 
Provision for loan losses  21  17 24 
  
 
 
 
Income before taxes and minority interest $473 $699 (32)%
Income taxes  168  251 (33)
Minority interest, net of taxes  6    
  
 
 
 
Net income $299 $448 (33)%
  
 
 
 
Revenues, net of interest expense, by region:         
 U.S $2,377 $2,385  
 Mexico  37  36 3%
 EMEA  170  108 57 
 Japan  415    
 Asia  212  234 (9)
 Latin America  63  55 15 
  
 
 
 
Total revenues $3,274 $2,818 16%
  
 
 
 
Net income by region:         
 U.S $163 $361 (55)%
 Mexico  12  12  
 EMEA  26  7 NM 
 Japan  27    
 Asia  56  65 (14)
 Latin America  15  3 NM 
  
 
 
 
Total net income $299 $448 (33)%
  
 
 
 
Key indicators:(in billions of dollars)         
Total assets under fee-based management $482 $418 15%
Total client assets(1)  1,707  1,493 14 
Net client asset flows $(1)$6 NM 
Financial advisors (FA) / bankers(1)  15,241  13,605 12 
Annualized revenue per FA / banker(in thousands of dollars)  858  837 3 
Average deposits and other customer liability balances  129  113 14 
Average loans  64  46 39 
  
 
 
 

(1)
During the second quarter of 2007, U.S. Consumer'sRetail Distribution transferred approximately $47 billion of client assets, 686 Financial Advisors and 79 branches toSmith Barney related to the consolidation of Citicorp Investment Services (CIS) intoSmith Barney.

NM
Not meaningful

1Q08 vs. 1Q07prior year.

        Revenues, net of interest expenseProvisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims, increased 16% primarily14% mainly due to the impact of the Nikko Cordial acquisition, an increase in fee-based revenues reflecting the continued advisory-based strategy, an increase in Structured Lending revenue in the U.S., and an increase in international revenues driven mainly by growth in Banking and Capital Markets revenueincreases in EMEAICGand Consumer Banking.

Total client assets, including assets under fee-based management, increased $214 billion, or 14%, mainly reflecting the inclusion of client assets from Nikko Cordial. Net flows declined compared to the prior year, to ($1) billion from $6 billion. GWM had 15,241 financial advisors/bankers as of March 31, 2008, compared with 13,605 as of March 31, 2007, driven by the Nikko Cordial acquisition and the consolidation of the legacy Citicorp Investment Services business.

Operating expenses increased 32% primarily due to the impact of acquisitions, a reserve of $250 million related to an offer of facilitating the liquidation of investments in the Falcon fund for its clients, higher variable compensation and repositioning charges.

        Theprovision for loan losses increased 24% to $21 million, primarily driven by higher write-offs of loans in Asia.


ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS

        Alternative Investments (CAI) manages capital on behalf of Citigroup, as well as for third-party institutional and high-net-worth investors. CAI is an integrated alternative investment platform that manages a wide range of products across five asset classes, including private equity, hedge funds, real estate, structured products and managed futures.

 
 First Quarter
  
 
In millions of dollars

 %
Change

 
 2008
 2007
 
Net interest revenue $(34)$(20)(70)%
Non-interest revenue  (324) 582 NM 
  
 
 
 
Total revenues, net of interest expense $(358)$562 NM 
  
 
 
 
Net realized and net change in unrealized gains $(462)$444 NM 
Fees, dividends and interest  38  35 9%
Other  (46) (43)(7)
  
 
 
 
Total proprietary investment activities revenues  (470) 436 NM 
Client revenues(1)  112  126 (11)%
  
 
 
 
Total revenues, net of interest expense $(358)$562 NM 
Operating expenses  498  180 NM 
Provision for loan losses    1 (100)%
  
 
 
 
Income (loss) before taxes and minority interest $(856)$381 NM 
  
 
 
 
Income taxes  (304) 138 NM 
Minority interest, net of taxes  (43) 21 NM 
  
 
 
 
Net income (loss) $(509)$222 NM 
  
 
 
 
Revenue by product:         
Client(1) $112 $126 (11)%
  
 
 
 
 Private Equity $115 $361 (68)%
 Hedge Funds  (257) 47 NM 
 Other  (328) 28 NM 
  
 
 
 
Proprietary $(470) 436 NM 
  
 
 
 
Total $(358)$562 NM 
  
 
 
 
Key indicators:(in billions of dollars)         
Capital under management:         
 Client $43.4 $42.9 1%
 Proprietary  10.9  10.8 1 
  
 
 
 
Total $54.3 $53.7 1%
  
 
 
 

(1)
Includes fee income.

NM
Not meaningful

        TheProprietary Portfolio of CAI consists of private equity, single- and multi-manager hedge funds, real estate and Legg Mason, Inc. (Legg Mason) preferred shares. Private equity, which constitutes the largest proprietary investments on both a direct and an indirect basis, is in the form of equity and mezzanine debt financing in companies across a broad range of industries worldwide, including investments in developing economies. Such investments include Citigroup Venture Capital International Brazil, LP (CVC/Brazil, formerly CVC/Opportunity Equity Partners, LP), which has invested primarily in companies privatized by the government of Brazil in the mid-1990s.

        The Company's investment in CVC/Brazil was previously subject to a variety of unresolved matters, including the pending litigation involving some of its portfolio companies. On April 25, 2008, the Company executed settlement agreements which resolved these litigation uncertainties. The resolution of these uncertainties will facilitate the sale of certain portfolio companies. Certain sales transactions may be subject to regulatory approvals.

        TheClient Portfolio is composed of single- and multi-manager hedge funds, real estate, managed futures, private equity, and a variety of leveraged fixed income products (credit structures). Products are distributed to investors directly by CAI and through GWM'sPrivate Bank andSmith Barney platforms. Revenue includes management and performance fees earned on the portfolio.

        The remaining 8.4 million shares of Legg Mason were sold during the first quarter of 2008.

        On July 2, 2007, the Company completed the acquisition of Old Lane Partners, LP and Old Lane Partners, GP, LLC (Old Lane). Old Lane is the manager of a global, multi-strategy hedge fund and a private equity fund with total assets under management and private equity commitments of approximately $4.5 billion. In the first quarter of 2008, Old Lane notified investors in its multi-strategy hedge fund that they would have the opportunity to redeem their investments in the fund, without restriction, effective July 31, 2008. In April 2008, substantially all unaffiliated investors had notified Old Lane of their intention to redeem their investments. The Company is currently evaluating alternatives for the restructuring of the Old Lane multi-strategy hedge fund.

        On February 20, 2008, the Company entered into a $500 million credit facility with the Falcon multi-strategy fixed income funds (Falcon funds) managed by CAI. As a result of providing this facility, the Company became the primary


beneficiaryTable of the Falcon funds and consolidated the assets and liabilities in its Consolidated Balance Sheet. On March 31, 2008, the total assets of the Falcon funds were approximately $4 billion.

        On March 3, 2008, the Company made an equity investment of $661 million (under a $1 billion commitment) which provides for gain sharing with unaffiliated investors, in the Municipal Opportunity Funds (MOFs). MOFs are funds managed by Alternative Investments that make leveraged investments in tax-exempt municipal bonds and accept investments through feeder funds known as ASTA and MAT. As a result of the Company's equity commitment, the Company became the primary beneficiary of the MOFs and consolidated the assets and liabilities in its Consolidated Balance Sheet. On March 31, 2008, the total assets of the MOFs were approximately $2 billion.Contents

1Q08ASIA

 
 First Quarter  
 
 
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

Net interest revenue (NIR)

 $2,095 $2,419  (13)%

Non-interest revenue

  1,714  2,168  (21)
        

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $3,809 $4,587  (17)%

Total operating expenses

  2,174  2,834  (23)

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

  989  727  36%
        

Income before taxes and noncontrolling interests

 $646 $1,026  (37)%

Income taxes

  4  269  (99)

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests

  (3) (8) 63%
        

Net income

 $645 $765  (16)%
        

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $301 $364  (17)%

Return on assets

  0.87% 0.85%   
        

Consumer Finance Japan (CFJ)—NIR

 $162 $264  (39)%

Asia excluding CFJ—NIR

 $1,933 $2,155  (10)
        

CFJ—Operating Expenses

 $59 $95  (38)%

Asia excluding CFJ—Operating Expenses

 $2,115 $2,739  (23)%
        

CFJ—Provision for loan losses and for benefits and claims

 $264 $317  (17)%

Asia excluding CFJ—provision for loan losses and for benefits and claims

 $725 $410  77 
        

CFJ—Net loss

 $(36)$(86) 58%

Asia excluding CFJ—Net Income

 $681 $851  (20)
        

Key Drivers(in billions of dollars, except branches)

          

Average Loans

 $107.5 $135.5  (21)%

Average Consumer Banking Loans

 $41.8 $51.9  (19)

Average deposits (and other consumer liability balances)

 $189.7 $215.7  (12)

Branches/offices

  952  1,281  (26)%
        

1Q09 vs. 1Q07

Revenues, net of interest expense, of $(358) million for the first quarter of 2008 decreased $920 million.

Total proprietary investment activity revenues, of $(470) million for the first quarter of 2008 were composed of revenues from private equity of $115 million, hedge funds of $(257) million and other investment activity of $(328) million. Private equity revenue decreased $246 million from the first quarter of 2007, driven by lower gains. Hedge fund revenue decreased $304 million, largely due to lower investment performance. Other investment activities revenue decreased $356 million from the first quarter of 2007, largely due to a $212 million MTM loss in the SIVs and lower investment performance. Client revenues decreased $14 million, reflecting lower performance of fixed income-oriented products, partially offset by the inclusion of Old Lane.

Operating expenses in the first quarter of 2008 of $498 million increased $318 million from the first quarter of 2007, primarily due to inclusion of Old Lane and the write down of $202 million of the intangible asset as a result of the offer to investors to redeem their investments in the Old Lane multi-strategy hedge fund.

Minority interest, net of taxes, in the first quarter of 2008 of $(43) million decreased $64 million from 2007, primarily due to lower gains related to underlying investments held by consolidated majority-owned legal entities. The impact of minority interest is reflected in fees, dividends, and interest, and net realized and net change in unrealized gains/(losses) consistent with proceeds received by minority interests.

Client capital under management of $43.4 billion at March 31, 2008 increased $0.5 billion from year-ago levels, due to the acquisition of Old Lane in 2007 and capital raised in private equity funds, offset by mark-to-market losses in fixed income-oriented products.


CORPORATE/OTHER

        Corporate/Other includes treasury results, unallocated corporate expenses, offsets to certain line-item reclassifications reported in the business segments (intersegment eliminations), and unallocated taxes.

 
 First Quarter
 
In millions of dollars

 
 2008
 2007
 
Net interest revenue $(169)$(35)
Non-interest revenue  (259) 51 
  
 
 
Revenues, net of interest expense $(428)$16 
Operating expense  125  1,418 
Provision for loan losses     
  
 
 
(Loss) before taxes and minority interest $(553)$(1,402)
Income taxes (benefits)  120  (491)
Minority interest, net of taxes  (9) 1 
  
 
 
Net (loss) $(664)$(912)
  
 
 

1Q08 vs. 1Q07

        Revenues, net of interest expense, decreased primarily due to mark-to-market losses on Nikko Cordial equity holdings17%.Global Cards revenue decreased 19% as continued growth in core revenue was more than offset by the current quarter, including a $212 million write-downimpact of Nikko Cordial's interest in an equity investment, as well asFX translation and the absence of a prior-yearan $81 million gain on Visa shares in the saleprior-year period.Consumer Banking revenues, excluding Consumer Finance Japan (CFJ), decreased by 25%, driven by the impact of certain corporate-owned assets.FX translation, lower investment revenue due to market disruption, and lower deposit spreads as interest rates declined across the region. S&B revenues increased 6%, driven by strong results from rates and currencies trading which was partially offset by write-downs of $657 million on Private Equity and Equity Investments. Transaction Services revenue decreased 13%, mostly driven by reduced Securities Funds Services revenue, due to decline in global stock markets. GWM revenue declined by 29%, due to the global decline in stock markets, and de-leveraging by our customers.

        Operating expensesExpenses, excluding decreased 23% reflecting benefits of re-engineering efforts and the 2007 first quarter restructuring chargeimpact of $1,377 million, increased primarily due to lower intersegment eliminations, as well as higher technologyFX translation, and other unallocated expenses.the absence of repositioning charges in the prior-year period.

        Income taxProvisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims increased 36% primarily driven by a $152 million incremental loan loss reserve build related toGlobal Cards,Consumer Banking and S&B, in addition to higher credit costs in India.

Asia Excluding CFJ

        As disclosed in the table above, excluding CFJ, net interest revenue decreased 10%. Driven by a 19% decline in average loans and a 15% decline in deposits, which was mainly due to a lower pretax loss in the 2008 first quarterimpact of FX translation.Operating expenses excluding CFJ decreased 23% and additional taxes held at Corporate.net income excluding CFJ decreased 20%.


Table of Contents


TARP AND OTHER REGULATORY PROGRAMS

Issuance of $25 Billion of Perpetual Preferred Stock and a Warrant to Purchase Common Stock under TARP

        On October 28, 2008, Citigroup raised $25 billion through the sale of non-voting perpetual, cumulative preferred stock and a warrant to purchase common stock to the U.S. Department of the Treasury (UST) as part of the UST's Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) Capital Purchase Program. All of the proceeds were treated as Tier 1 Capital for regulatory capital purposes.

        The preferred stock has an aggregate liquidation preference of $25 billion and an annual dividend rate of 5% for the first five years and 9% thereafter. Dividends are cumulative and payable quarterly in cash. As previously disclosed, Citi will continue to pay full dividends on the preferred stock up to and including the closing of the public exchange offers, at which point the dividends will be suspended.

        Of the $25 billion in cash proceeds, $23.7 billion was allocated to preferred stock and $1.3 billion to the warrant on a relative fair value basis. The discount on the preferred stock will be accreted and recognized as a preferred dividend (reduction ofRetained earnings) over a period of five years. The warrant has a term of ten years, an exercise price of $17.85 per share and is exercisable for approximately 210.1 million shares of common stock, which would be reduced by one-half if Citigroup raises an additional $25 billion through the issuance of Tier 1-qualifying perpetual preferred or common stock by December 31, 2009. The value ascribed to the warrant was recorded in Citigroup's stockholders' equity and resulted in an increase inAdditional paid-in capital.

Additional Issuance of $20 Billion of Perpetual Preferred Stock and a Warrant to Purchase Common Stock under TARP

        On December 31, 2008, Citigroup raised an additional $20 billion through the sale of non-voting perpetual, cumulative preferred stock and a warrant to purchase common stock to the UST as part of TARP. All of the proceeds were treated as Tier 1 Capital for regulatory capital purposes.

        The preferred stock has an aggregate liquidation preference of $20 billion and an annual dividend rate of 8%. Dividends are cumulative and payable quarterly in cash. Of the $20 billion in cash proceeds, $19.5 billion was allocated to preferred stock and $0.5 billion to the warrant on a relative fair value basis. The discount on the preferred stock will not be accreted and will only be recognized as a preferred dividend (reduction ofRetained earnings) at the time of redemption. The warrant has a term of 10 years, an exercise price of $10.61 per share and is exercisable for approximately 188.5 million common shares. The value ascribed to the warrant was recorded in Citigroup's stockholders' equity and resulted in an increase inAdditional paid-in capital.

        The issuance of the warrants in October and December 2008, as well as other common stock issuances, resulted in a conversion price reset of the $12.5 billion of 7% convertible preferred stock sold in a private offering in January 2008. See "Events in 2009," "Capital Resources" and Note 13 for a further discussion. As previously disclosed, Citi will continue to pay full dividends on the preferred stock up to and including the closing of the public exchange offers, at which point the dividends will be suspended.

        For both the October 2008 and December 2008 issuances under TARP, the proceeds were allocated between the preferred stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis. The fair value for the preferred stock was calculated using a discounted cash flow approach. The cash flows were based on the stated dividend rate on the preferred stock. The discount rate was selected from the range of observable yield to maturities based on the secondary trading prices for similar instruments issued by Citigroup. The fair value for the warrants was calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The valuation was based on the Citigroup stock price, stock volatility, dividend yield, and the risk free rate on the measurement date for both the issuances.

FDIC's Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program

        Under the terms of the FDIC's Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (TLGP), the FDIC will guarantee, until the earlier of either its maturity or June 30, 2012 (for qualifying debt issued before April 1, 2009) or December 31, 2012 (for qualifying debt issued on or after April 1, 2009 through October 31, 2009), certain qualifying senior unsecured debt issued by certain Citigroup entities between October 31, 2008 and October 31, 2009 in amounts up to 125% of the qualifying debt for each qualifying entity. The FDIC charges Citigroup a fee ranging from 50 to 150 basis points in accordance with a prescribed fee schedule for any qualifying debt issued with the FDIC guarantee.

        As to any entity participating in the TLGP, the TLGP regulations grant discretion to the FDIC, after consultation with the participating entity's appropriate Federal banking agency, to determine that the entity will no longer be permitted to continue to participate in the TLGP. If the FDIC makes that determination, it will inform the entity that it will no longer be provided the protections of the TLGP. Such a determination will not affect the guarantee of prior debt issuances under the TLGP.

        As of March 31, 2009, Citigroup and its affiliates had issued $27.6 billion of long-term debt that is covered under the FDIC guarantee ($5.75 billion of which was issued by Citigroup in December 2008), with $6.35 billion maturing in 2010, $6.25 billion maturing in 2011 and $15.0 billion maturing in 2012. During the second quarter of 2009, Citigroup affiliates have issued an additional $7.0 billion of long-term debt under this program.

        In addition, Citigroup, through its subsidiaries, also had $29.9 billion in commercial paper and interbank deposits backed by the FDIC outstanding as of March 31, 2009. The FDIC also charges a fee ranging from 50 to 150 basis points in connection with the issuance of those instruments.

FDIC Increased Deposit Insurance

        On October 4, 2008, as a part of TARP, the FDIC increased the insurance it provides on U.S. deposits in most banks and savings associations located in the United States, including Citibank, N.A., from $100,000 to $250,000 per depositor, per insured bank.


Table of Contents

U.S. Government Loss-Sharing Agreement

Background

        On January 15, 2009, Citigroup entered into a definitive agreement with the UST, the FDIC and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (collectively, the USG) on losses arising on a $301 billion portfolio of Citigroup assets (valued as of November 21, 2008, other than with respect to approximately $99 billion in "replacement" assets which are valued as of January 15, 2009). As consideration for the loss-sharing agreement, Citigroup issued non-voting perpetual, cumulative preferred stock to the UST and the FDIC, as well as a warrant to the UST.

        The preferred stock issued to the UST and the FDIC has an aggregate liquidation preference of $7.059 billion and an annual dividend rate of 8%. As previously disclosed, Citi will continue to pay full dividends on the preferred stock up to and including the closing of the public exchange offers, at which point the dividends will be suspended.

        The warrant has a term of 10 years, an exercise price of $10.61 per share and is exercisable for approximately 66.5 million common shares. Citigroup received no additional cash proceeds for their issuance. Of the issuance, $3.617 billion, representing the total fair value of the issued shares and warrant, is treated as Tier 1 Capital.

        The loss-sharing program extends for 10 years for residential assets and five years for non-residential assets. Under the agreement, a "loss" on a portfolio asset is defined to include a charge-off or a realized loss upon collection, through a permitted disposition or exchange, or upon a foreclosure or short-sale loss, but not merely through a change in Citigroup's fair value accounting for the asset or the creation or increase of a related loss reserve. Once a loss is recognized under the agreement, the aggregate amount of qualifying losses across the portfolio in a particular period is netted against the aggregate recoveries and gains across the portfolio, all on a pretax basis. The resulting net loss amount on the portfolio is the basis of the loss-sharing agreement between Citigroup and the USG. Citigroup will bear the first $39.5 billion of such net losses, which amount was determined using (i) an agreed-upon $29 billion of first losses, (ii) Citigroup's then-existing reserve with respect to the portfolio of approximately $9.5 billion, and (iii) an additional $1.0 billion as an agreed-upon amount in exchange for excluding the effects of certain hedge positions from the portfolio. Net losses, if any, on the portfolio after Citigroup's losses exceed the $39.5 billion first-loss amount will be borne 90% by the USG and 10% by Citigroup in the following manner:

        As discussed below, the Company recognized approximately $2.9 billion of qualifying losses related to the portfolio (excluding the replacement assets) from November 21, 2008 through March 31, 2009. These losses count towards Citigroup's $39.5 billion first-loss position.

        The Federal Reserve Bank of New York will implement its loss-sharing obligations under the agreement by making a loan, after Citigroup's first-loss position and the obligations of the UST and FDIC have been exhausted, in an amount equal to the then aggregate value of the remaining covered asset pool (after reductions for charge-offs, pay-downs and realized losses) as determined in accordance with the agreement. Following the loan, as losses are incurred on the remaining covered asset pool, Citigroup will be required to immediately repay 10% of such losses to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The loan is non-recourse to Citigroup, other than with respect to the repayment obligation in the preceding sentence and interest on the loan. The loan is recourse only to the remaining covered asset pool, which is the sole collateral to secure the loan. The loan will bear interest at the overnight index swap rate plus 300 basis points.

        The covered asset pool includes U.S.-based exposures and transactions that were originated prior to March 14, 2008. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the composition of the covered asset pool, the amount of Citigroup's first-loss position and the premium paid for loss coverage are subject to final confirmation by the USG of, among other things, the qualification of assets under the asset eligibility criteria, expected losses and reserves. See "Events in 2009—Loss-Sharing Agreement."

        The USG has a 120-day confirmation period to finalize the composition of the asset pool from the date that Citi submitted its revised asset pool. The revised asset pool was submitted by Citigroup on April 15, 2009 and, therefore, is expected to be finalized by the USG by August 13, 2009. The advisor to the USG has commenced its review of the assets. In addition, as a result of receipt of principal repayments and charge-offs, the total asset pool has declined by approximately $17 billion from the original $301 billion. Approximately $2.0 billion of losses on the asset pool were recorded in the first quarter of 2009, bringing the agreement-to-date losses to approximately $2.9 billion.

        The agreement includes guidelines for governance and asset management with respect to the covered asset pool, including reporting requirements and notice and approval rights of the USG at certain thresholds. If covered losses exceed $27 billion, the USG has the right to change the asset manager for the covered asset pool.

Accounting and Regulatory Capital Treatment

        Citigroup accounts for the USG loss-sharing agreement as an indemnification agreement pursuant to the guidance in FASB Statement No. 141 (revised 2007),Business Combinations. Citigroup recorded an asset of $3.617 billion (equal to the fair value of the consideration issued to the USG) in Other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The asset will be amortized as an Other operating expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income on a straight-line basis over the coverage periods of 10 years for residential assets and five years for non-residential assets, based on the relative initial principal amounts of each group. During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, Citigroup recorded $171 million as an Other operating expense.

        Under indemnification accounting, recoveries (gains), if any, will be recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income in the same future periods that cumulative losses recorded under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) on the covered assets exceed our $39.5 billion first-loss amount. The Company will recognize and


Table of Contents

measure an indemnification asset on the same basis that it recognizes losses on the covered assets in the Consolidated Statement of Income. For example, for a covered loan classified as held-for-investment and reported in the balance sheet at amortized cost, the Company would recognize and measure an indemnification asset due from the USG at the same time related loan loss reserves are recorded for that loan equal to 90% of the amount of the loan loss reserve, subject to the first-loss limitation. Under indemnification accounting, recoveries (gains) may be recorded at times when such amounts are not contractually receivable from the USG based on the definition of covered losses in the loss-sharing program; such amounts may or may not thereafter become contractually receivable, depending upon whether or not they become covered "losses" (see above for definition of covered "loss"). Indemnification accounting matches the amount and timing of the recording of recoveries with the amount and timing of the recognition of losses based on the U.S. GAAP accounting for the covered assets, as opposed to the amount and timing of recognition as defined in the loss-sharing agreement. The indemnification asset amount recorded will be adjusted, as appropriate, to take into consideration additional revenue and expense amounts related to the covered assets specifically defined as recoverable or non-recoverable in the loss sharing program. As of March 31, 2009, the Company has recognized cumulative U.S. GAAP losses on the covered assets that are substantially below our first-loss amount and, therefore, no additional indemnification asset has been recognized at this time.

        The covered assets are risk-weighted at 20% for purposes of calculating the Tier 1 Capital ratio at March 31, 2009.

        The following table summarizes the assets that were part of the covered asset pool agreed to between Citigroup and the USG as of January 16, 2009, with their values as of November 21, 2008 (except as set forth in the note to the table below and as described above), and the balances as of March 31, 2009, reflecting changes in the balances of assets that remained qualified, plus approximately $10 billion of new replacement assets that Citi substituted for non-qualifying assets. The asset pool, as revised, remains subject to the USG's final confirmation process, anticipated to occur by August 13, 2009. See "Events in 2009—Loss-Sharing Agreement":

Assets

In billions of dollars March 31,
2009
 November 21,
2008(1)(2)
 

Loans:

       
 

First mortgages

 $91.6 $98.0 
 

Second mortgages

  54.5  55.4 
 

Retail auto loans

  14.2  16.2 
 

Other consumer loans

  19.2  19.7 
      

Total consumer loans

 $179.5 $189.3 
      
 

CRE loans

 $12.0 $12.0 
 

Highly leveraged finance loans

  1.9  2.0 
 

Other corporate loans

  14.0  14.0 
      

Total corporate loans

 $27.9 $28.0 
      

Securities:

       
 

Alt-A

 $10.9 $11.4 
 

SIVs

  6.1  6.1 
 

CRE

  1.4  1.4 
 

Other

  10.0  11.2 
      

Total securities

 $28.4 $30.1 
      

Unfunded Lending Commitments (ULC)

       
 

Second mortgages

 $20.7 $22.4 
 

Other consumer loans

  2.9  3.6 
 

Highly leveraged finance

  0.1  0.1 
 

CRE

  4.5  5.5 
 

Other commitments

  20.2  22.0 
      

Total ULC

 $48.4 $53.6 
      

Total covered assets

 $284.2 $301.0 
      

(1)
As a result of the initial confirmation process (conducted between November 21, 2008 and January 15, 2009), the covered asset pool includes approximately $99 billion of assets considered "replacement" assets (assets that were added to the pool to replace assets that were in the pool as of November 21, 2008 but were later determined not to qualify). Loss-sharing on qualifying losses incurred on these replacement assets was effective beginning January 15, 2009, instead of November 21, 2008.

(2)
Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.

Table of Contents

Exchange Offer

        On February 27, 2009, the Company announced an exchange offer of its common stock for up to $27.5 billion of its existing preferred securities and trust preferred securities at a conversion price of $3.25 per share. On May 7, 2009, as a result of the USG's Supervisory Capital Assessment Program (SCAP), the Company announced that it will expand the Exchange Offer by increasing the maximum amount of preferred securities and trust preferred securities that it will accept in the Exchange Offer by $5.5 billion to a total of $33 billion. The USG will match the exchange up to a maximum of $25 billion of its preferred stock at the same conversion price. See "Events in 2009—Exchange Offer and Conversions" and "—The Supervisory Capital Assessment Program (SCAP)."

Implementation and Management of TARP Programs

        After Citigroup received the TARP capital, it established a Special TARP Committee composed of senior executives to approve, monitor and track how the funds are utilized. The TARP securities purchase agreements stipulate that Citi will adhere to the following objectives as a condition of the UST's capital investment:

        The Committee has established specific guidelines, which are consistent with the objectives and spirit of the program. Pursuant to these guidelines, Citi will use TARP capital only for those purposes expressly approved by the Committee. TARP capital will not be used for compensation and bonuses, dividend payments, lobbying or government relations activities, or any activities related to marketing, advertising and corporate sponsorship. TARP capital will be used exclusively to support assets and not for expenses.

        Committee approval is the final stage in a four-step review process to evaluate proposals from Citi businesses for the use of TARP capital, considering the risk, the potential financial impact and returns.

        On February 3, 2009, Citi published a report summarizing its TARP spending initiatives for the 2008 fourth quarter and made this report available at www.citigroup.com. The report indicated that the Committee had authorized $36.5 billion in initiatives backed by TARP capital. Subsequently, an additional $8.25 billion of spending initiatives has been approved, bringing the total approved spending to $44.8 billion. As of March 31, 2009, the Company has deployed approximately $8.2 billion of funds under the approved initiatives.

        Separately from the Company's initiatives under TARP, the report also describes Citigroup's other efforts to help U.S. homeowners remain in their homes, assist distressed borrowers and support U.S consumers and businesses.

        Citi will update this TARP report each quarter following its quarterly earnings announcement and will make the report publicly available. In addition, Citi is committed to meeting all reporting requirements associated with TARP.


Table of Contents


MANAGING GLOBAL RISK

        Citigroup's risk management framework balances strong themed corporate oversight with well-defined independent risk management functions withinfor each business.business and region, as well as cross-business product expertise. The Citigroup risk management framework is described in Citigroup's 20072008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

DETAILS OF CREDIT LOSS EXPERIENCE

In millions of dollars

In millions of dollars

 1st Qtr.
2008

 4th Qtr.(1)
2007

 3rd Qtr.(1)
2007

 2nd Qtr.(1)
2007

 1st Qtr.(1)
2007

 In millions of dollars 1st Qtr.
2009
 4th Qtr
2008
 3rd Qtr.
2008
 2nd Qtr.
2008
 1st Qtr.
2008
 
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of periodAllowance for loan losses at beginning of period $16,117 $12,728 $10,381 $9,510 $8,940 

Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period

 $29,616 $24,005 $20,777 $18,257 $16,117 
 
 
 
 
 
             
Provision for loan lossesProvision for loan losses           

Provision for loan losses

 
Consumer $5,502 $6,539 $4,622 $2,577 $2,452  

Consumer(1)

 $8,127 $8,836 $7,855 $6,259 $5,332 
Corporate 249 883 154 (57) 254  

Corporate

 1,788 3,335 1,088 724 245 
 
 
 
 
 
           �� 
 $5,751 $7,422 $4,776 $2,520 $2,706 

 $9,915 $12,171 $8,943 $6,983 $5,577 
 
 
 
 
 
             
Gross credit lossesGross credit losses           

Gross credit losses

 
Consumer           

Consumer(1)

Consumer(1)

 
In U.S. offices $2,357 $1,914 $1,382 $1,264 $1,290 

In U.S. offices

 $4,159 $3,687 $3,069 $2,599 $2,325 
In offices outside the U.S.  1,851 1,601 1,617 1,346 1,341 

In offices outside the U.S. 

 1,936 1,818 1,914 1,798 1,637 
CorporateCorporate           

Corporate

 
In U.S. offices 40 596 18 22 7 

In U.S. offices

 1,140 287 160 185 40 
In offices outside the U.S.  97 169 74 30 29 

In offices outside the U.S. 

 424 756 200 197 97 
 
 
 
 
 
             
 $4,345 $4,280 $3,091 $2,662 $2,667 

 $7,659 $6,548 $5,343 $4,779 $4,099 
 
 
 
 
 
             
Credit recoveriesCredit recoveries           

Credit recoveries

 
ConsumerConsumer           

Consumer

 
In U.S. offices $179 $168 $166 $175 $214 

In U.S. offices

 $135 $132 $137 $148 $172 
In offices outside the U.S.  328 341 279 343 286 

In offices outside the U.S. 

 213 219 252 286 253 
CorporateCorporate           

Corporate

 
In U.S. offices 3 15 1 9 18 

In U.S. offices

 1 2 3 2 3 
In offices outside the U.S.  33 55 59 80 40 

In offices outside the U.S. 

 28 52 31 23 33 
 
 
 
 
 
             
 $543 $579 $505 $607 $558 

 $377 $405 $423 $459 $461 
 
 
 
 
 
             
Net credit lossesNet credit losses           

Net credit losses

 
In U.S. offices $2,215 $2,327 $1,233 $1,102 $1,065 

In U.S. offices

 $5,163 $3,840 $3,089 $2,634 $2,190 
In offices outside the U.S.  1,587 1,374 1,353 953 1,044 

In offices outside the U.S. 

 $2,119 $2,303 1,831 1,686 1,448 
 
 
 
 
 
             
TotalTotal 3,802 3,701 $2,586 $2,055 $2,109 

Total

 7,282 6,143 $4,920 $4,320 $3,638 
 
 
 
 
 
             
Other—net(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)Other—net(2)(3)(4)(5)(6) $191 $(332)$157 $406 $(27)

Other—net(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)

 $(546)$(417)$(795)$(143)$201 
 
 
 
 
 
             
Allowance for loan losses at end of periodAllowance for loan losses at end of period 18,257 16,117 $12,728 $10,381 $9,510 

Allowance for loan losses at end of period

 31,703 29,616 $24,005 $20,777 $18,257 
 
 
 
 
 
             

Allowance for loan losses as a % of total loans

Allowance for loan losses as a % of total loans

 4.82% 4.27% 3.35% 2.78% 2.31%
Allowance for unfunded lending commitments(7)Allowance for unfunded lending commitments(7) $1,250 $1,250 $1,150 $1,100 $1,100 

Allowance for unfunded lending commitments(7)

 $947 $887 $957 $1,107 $1,250 
 
 
 
 
 
             
Total allowance for loan losses and unfunded lending commitmentsTotal allowance for loan losses and unfunded lending commitments $19,507 $17,367 $13,878 $11,481 $10,610 

Total allowance for loan losses and unfunded lending commitments

 $32,650 $30,503 $24,962 $21,884 $19,507 
 
 
 
 
 
             

Allowance for loan losses as % of loans

Allowance for loan losses as % of loans

 
Net consumer credit lossesNet consumer credit losses $3,701 $3,006 $2,554 $2,092 $2,131 

Net consumer credit losses

 $5,747 $5,154 $4,594 $3,963 $3,537 
As a percentage of average consumer loansAs a percentage of average consumer loans 2.50% 2.02% 1.81% 1.56% 1.70%

As a percentage of average consumer loans

 4.64% 3.93% 3.35% 2.83% 2.52%
 
 
 
 
 
             
Net corporate credit losses/(recoveries)Net corporate credit losses/(recoveries) $101 $695 $32 $(37)$(22)

Net corporate credit losses/(recoveries)

 $1,535 $989 $326 $357 $101 
As a percentage of average corporate loansAs a percentage of average corporate loans 0.05% 0.34% 0.02% NM NM 

As a percentage of average corporate loans

 0.92% 0.56% 0.19% 0.19% 0.05%
 
 
 
 
 
             

(1)
Reclassified to conformIncluded in the allowance for loan losses are reserves for Troubled Debt Restructurings (TDRs) of $2,760 million, $2,180 million, $1,443 million, $882 million and $443 million as March 31, 2009, December 31, 2008, September 30, 2008, June 30, 2008, and March 31, 2008, respectively.

(2)
The first quarter of 2009 primarily includes reductions to the current period's presentationcredit loss reserves of $213 million related to securitizations and reductions of approximately $320 million primarily related to FX translation.

(2)(3)
The fourth quarter of 2008 primarily includes reductions to the credit loss reserves of approximately $400 million primarily related to FX translation.

(4)
The third quarter of 2008 primarily includes reductions to the credit loss reserves of $23 million related to securitizations, reductions of $244 million related to the pending sale of Citigroup's German Retail Banking Operation and reductions of approximately $500 million related to FX translation.

(5)
The second quarter of 2008 primarily includes reductions to the credit loss reserves of $21 million related to securitizations, reductions of $156 million related to the sale of CitiCapital and additions of $56 million related to purchase price adjustments for the Grupo Cuscatlan acquisition.

(6)
The first quarter of 2008 primarily includes reductions to the credit loss reserves of $58 million related to securitizations, additions of $50 million related to the Bank of Overseas ChineseBOOC acquisition and additions mainly related to foreign currency translation.

(3)
The fourth quarter of 2007 primarily includes reductions to the credit loss reserves of $150$217 million related to securitizations and $7 million related to transfers to Loans held-for-sale, reductions of $151 million related to purchase price adjustments to the Egg Bank acquisition and reductions of $83 million related to the transfer of the U.K. Citifinancial portfolio to Loans held-for-sale.

(4)
The third quarter of 2007 primarily includes additions related to purchase accounting adjustments related to the acquisition of Grupo Cuscatlan of $181 million offset by reductions of $73 million related to securitizations.

(5)
The second quarter of 2007 primarily includes additions to the loan loss reserve of $505 million related to the acquisition of Egg and Nikko Cordial, partially offset by reductions of $70 million related to securitizations and $77 million related to a balance sheet reclassification to Loans held-for-sale in the U.S. Cards portfolio.

(6)
The first quarter of 2007 includes reductions to the loan loss reserve of $98 million related to a balance sheet reclassification to Loans held-for-sale in the U.S. Cards portfolio and the addition of $75 million related to the acquisition of Grupo Financiero Uno.FX translation.

(7)
Represents additional credit loss reserves for unfunded corporate lending commitments and letters of credit recorded withinOther Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

NM
Not meaningful

Table of Contents

NON-PERFORMING ASSETS (NON-ACCRUAL LOANS, OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED AND OTHER REPOSSESSED ASSETS)

        The table below summarizes the Company's non-accrual loans. These are loans in which the borrower has fallen behind in interest payments, or for corporate loans where the Company has determined that the payment of interest or principal is doubtful, and are now considered impaired. In situations where the Company reasonably expects that only a portion of the principal and interest owed will ultimately be collected, all payments received are reflected as a reduction of principal and not as interest income.

In millions of dollars 1st Qtr.
2009
 4th Qtr
2008
 3rd Qtr.
2008
 2nd Qtr.
2008
 1st Qtr.
2008
 

Corporate non-accrual loans(1)

                

North America

 $3,305 $2,415 $715 $469 $443 

EMEA

  6,503  6,375  1,433  1,602  1,276 

Latin America

  322  238  133  81  74 

Asia

  679  541  385  124  241 
            

 $10,809 $9,569 $2,666 $2,276 $2,034 
            

Consumer non-accrual loans(1)(2)

                

North America

 $12,185 $9,876 $8,149 $6,471 $5,724 

EMEA

  1,085  886  801  815  663 

Latin America

  1,321  1,284  1,339  1,436  1,291 

Asia

  711  682  588  628  623 
            

 $15,302 $12,728 $10,877 $9,350 $8,301 
            

        The table below summarizes the Company's other real estate owned (OREO) assets. This represents the carrying value of all property acquired by foreclosure or other legal proceedings when the Company has taken possession of the collateral.

 
 1st Qtr.
2009
 4th Qtr
2008
 3rd Qtr.
2008
 2nd Qtr.
2008
 1st Qtr.
2008
 

Corporate OREO

                

North America

 $180 $246 $371 $453 $484 

EMEA

  15  23  15  17  13 

Latin America

  10  14  16  19  48 

Asia

  69  53       
            

 $274 $336 $402 $489 $545 
            

Consumer OREO

                

North America

 $846 $1,013 $1,112 $1,028 $856 

EMEA

  65  67  68  70  71 

Latin America

  15  15  19  20  77 

Asia

  2  2  1  3  4 
            

 $928 $1,097 $1,200 $1,121 $1,008 
            

Other repossessed assets(3)

 $78 $78 $81 $94 $107 
            

(1)
Excludes purchased distressed loans as they are accreting interest in accordance with Statement of Position 03-3, "Accounting for Certain Loans on Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer" (SOP 03-3). The carrying value of these loans was $1.328 billion at March 31, 2009, $1.510 billion at December 31, 2008, $1.550 billion at September 30, 2008, $1.891 billion at June 30, 2008, and $2.224 billion at March 31, 2008.

(2)
Includes the impact of the deterioration in the U.S. consumer real estate market.

(3)
Primarily transportation equipment, carried at lower of cost or fair value, less costs to sell.

Table of Contents

        There is no industry-wide definition of non-performing assets. As such, analysis against the industry is not always comparable. The table below represents the Company's view of non-performing assets. As a general rule, unsecured consumer loans are charged off at 120 days past due and credit card loans are charged off at 180 days contractually past due. Consumer loans secured with non-real-estate collateral are written down to the estimated value of the collateral, less costs to sell, at 120 days past due. Consumer real-estate secured loans are written down to the estimated value of the property, less costs to sell, when they are 180 days contractually past due. Impaired corporate loans and leases are written down to the extent that principal is judged to be uncollectible.

Non-performing assets 1st Qtr.
2009
 4th Qtr
2008
 3rd Qtr.
2008
 2nd Qtr.
2008
 1st Qtr.
2008
 

Corporate non-accrual loans

 $10,809 $9,569 $2,666 $2,276 $2,034 

Consumer non-accrual loans

  15,302  12,728  10,877  9,350  8,301 
            
 

Non-accrual loans (NAL)

 $26,111 $22,297 $13,543 $11,626 $10,335 
            

OREO

 $1,202 $1,433 $1,602 $1,610 $1,553 

Other repossessed assets

  78  78  81  94  107 
            
 

Non-performing assets (NPA)

 $27,391 $23,808 $15,226 $13,330 $11,995 
            

NAL as a % of total loans

  3.97% 3.21% 1.89% 1.56% 1.31%

NPA as a % of total assets

  1.50% 1.23% 0.74% 0.63% 0.55%

Allowance for loan losses as a % of NAL(1)

  121% 133% 177% 179% 177%
            

(1)
The $6.403 billion of non-accrual loans transferred from the held-for-sale portfolio to the held-for-investment portfolio during the fourth quarter of 2008 were marked-to-market at the transfer date and, therefore, no allowance was necessary at the time of the transfer. $2.426 billion of the par value of the loans reclassified was written off prior to transfer.

Consumer Loan Balances, Net of Unearned Income


 End of Period
 Average
 End of Period Average 
In billions of dollars

 Mar. 31,
2008

 Dec. 31,(1)
2007

 Mar. 31,(1)
2007

 1st Qtr.
2008

 4th Qtr.(1)
2007

 1st Qtr.(1)
2007

 Mar. 31,
2009
 Dec. 31,(1)
2008
 Mar. 31,(1)
2008
 1st Qtr.
2009
 4th Qtr.(1)
2008
 1st Qtr.(1)
2008
 
On-balance sheet(2) $593.0 $587.7 $512.2 $595.6 $585.2 $507.9 $488.9 $515.7 $561.6 $502.2 $521.0 $564.6 
Securitized receivables (all inU.S. Cards)  109.3 108.1 98.6 105.6 99.6 97.3 106.0 105.9 109.5 102.6 105.6 105.8 
Credit card receivables held-for-sale(3)  0.9 1.0 3.0 1.0 2.7 3.0   0.9   1.0 
 
 
 
 
 
 
             
Total managed(4) $703.2 $696.8 $613.8 $702.2 $687.5 $608.2 $594.9 $621.6 $672.0 $604.8 $626.6 $671.4 
 
 
 
 
 
 
             

(1)
Reclassified to conform to current period's presentation.

(2)
Total loans and total average loans exclude certain interest and fees on credit cards of approximately $2$3 billion and $2$3 billion for the first quarter of 2008,2009, approximately $3 billion and $3 billion for the fourth quarter of 20072008 and approximately $2 billion and $2 billion for the first quarter of 2007,2008, respectively, which are included in Consumer Loansloans on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

(3)
Included inOther Assetsassets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

(4)
This table presents loan information on a held basis and shows the impact of securitizations to reconcile to a managed basis. Although a managed basismanaged-basis presentation is not in conformity with GAAP, the Company believes managed credit statistics provide a representation of performance and key indicators of the credit card business that are consistent with the way management reviews operating performance and allocates resources. Held-basis reporting is the related GAAP measure.

        Citigroup's total allowanceAllowance for loans, leases and unfunded lending commitments of $19.5$32.650 billion is available to absorb probable credit losses inherent in the entire portfolio. For analytical purposes only, the portion of Citigroup's allowance for loan losses attributed to the Consumer portfolio was $14.4$24.281 billion at March 31, 2008, $12.42009, $22.366 billion at December 31, 20072008 and $6.3$14.368 billion at March 31, 2007.2008. The increase in the allowanceAllowance for loan losses from March 31, 20072008 of $8.1$9.913 billion included net builds of $7.9$11.619 billion.

        The builds consisted of $7.8$11.287 billion inGlobal Cards andConsumer Banking($6.28.514 billion in U.S. ConsumerNorth America and $1.6$2.773 billion in International Consumer),regions outsideNorth America) and $93$332 million inGlobal Wealth Management.Management.

        The build of $6.2$8.514 billion in U.S. ConsumerNorth America primarily reflected an increase in the estimate of losses embedded in the portfolioacross all portfolios based on weakening leading credit indicators, including increased delinquencies on first and second mortgages, unsecured personal loans, credit cards and auto loans. Also, theThe build also reflected trends in the U.S. macroeconomic environment, including the housing market downturn, rising unemployment rates and portfolio growth. The build of $1.6$2.773 billion in International Consumerregions outsideNorth America primarily reflected portfolio growth and the impact of recent acquisitions and credit deterioration in certain countries.Mexico, the U.K., Spain, Greece, and India.

        On-balance-sheet consumer loans of $593.0$488.9 billion increased $80.8decreased $72.7 billion, or 16%13%, from March 31, 2007,2008, primarily driven by a decrease in residential real estate lending inU.S. Consumer Lending, U.S. Retail Distribution, InternationalBanking North America as well as the impact of FX translation acrossGlobal Cards, International RetailConsumer Banking andPrivate BankGWM.. Net credit losses, delinquencies and the related ratios are affected by the credit performance of the portfolios, including bankruptcies, unemployment, global economic conditions, portfolio growth and seasonal factors, as well as macro-economic and regulatory policies.


EXPOSURE TO U.S. RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATETable of Contents

SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURES IN SECURITIES AND BANKING

U.S. Subprime-Related Direct Exposure inSecurities and Banking

        The following table summarizes Citigroup's U.S. subprime-related direct exposures inSecurities and Banking (S&B) at March 31, 20082009 and December 31, 2007:2008:

In billions of dollars

 December 31, 2007
exposures

 First quarter
2008 write-downs

 First quarter
2008 sales/transfers(1)

 March 31, 2008
exposures

 
Direct ABS CDO Super Senior Exposures:             
 Gross ABS CDO Super Senior Exposures (A) $39.8       $33.2 
 Hedged Exposures (B)  10.5        10.5 
Net ABS CDO Super Senior Exposures:             
 ABCP/CDO(2) $20.6 $(3.1)$(0.7)$16.8(4)
 High grade  4.9  (1.0) (0.1) 3.8(5)
 Mezzanine  3.6  (1.5)(3) (0.1) 2.0(6)
 ABS CDO-squared  0.2  (0.1)(3) (0.0) 0.1 
  
 
 
 
 
Total Net Direct ABS CDO Super Senior Exposures (A-B)=(C) $29.3 $(5.7)$(0.9)$22.7 
  
 
 
 
 
Lending & Structuring Exposures:             
 CDO warehousing/unsold tranches of ABS CDOs $0.2 $(0.1)$0.1 $0.2 
 Subprime loans purchased for sale or securitization  4.0  (0.2) (0.2) 3.6 
 Financing transactions secured by subprime  3.8  (0.0) (1.1) 2.6 
  
 
 
 
 
Total Lending and Structuring Exposures (D) $8.0 $(0.3)$(1.2)$6.4 
  
 
 
 
 
Total Net Exposures (C+D)(7) $37.3 $(6.0)$(2.1)$29.1 
  
 
 
 
 
Credit Adjustment on Hedged Counterparty Exposures (E)(8)    $(1.5)      
  
 
 
 
 
Total Net Write-Downs (C+D+E)    $(7.5)      
  
 
 
 
 
In billions of dollars December 31, 2008
exposures
 First
Quarter
2009 write-downs(1)
 First
Quarter
2009 sales/transfers(2)
 March 31, 2009 exposures 

Direct ABS CDO super senior exposures:

             
 

Gross ABS CDO super senior exposures (A)

 $18.9       $15.2 
 

Hedged exposures (B)

  6.9        6.6 

Net ABS CDO super senior exposures:

             
 

ABCP/CDO(3)

  9.9 $(2.0)$(0.4) 7.6 
 

High grade

  0.8  (0.1) 0.0  0.6 
 

Mezzanine

  1.3  (0.2)(4) (0.8) 0.3 
          

Total net ABS CDO super senior exposures (A-B=C)

 $12.0 $(2.3)$(1.2)(5)$8.5 
          

Lending and structuring exposures:

             
 

CDO warehousing/unsold tranches of ABS CDOs

 $0.1 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 
 

Subprime loans purchased for sale or securitization

  1.3  (0.1) (0.1) 1.1 
 

Financing transactions secured by subprime

  0.7  0.0(4) (0.1) 0.5 
          

Total lending and structuring exposures (D)

 $2.0 $(0.1)$(0.3)$1.7 
          

Total net exposures C+D(6)

 $14.1 $(2.4)$(1.4)$10.2 
          

Credit adjustment on hedged counterparty exposures (E)(7)

    $(1.1)      
          

Total net write-downs (C+D+E)

    $(3.5)      
          

Note:    Table may not foot or cross-foot due to roundings.

(1)
Includes net profits and losses associated with liquidations.

(2)
Reflects sales, transfers and repayment or liquidations of principal and liquidations.

(2)
Super senior tranches of older vintage, high grade ABS CDOs. During the fourth quarter of 2007 these were consolidated on Citigroup's balance sheet.principal.

(3)
Consists of older-vintage, high-grade ABS CDOs.

(4)
Includes $79$147 million recorded in credit costs.

(4)(5)
The $16.8 billionA portion of ABCP/CDO exposurethe underlying securities was purchased in liquidations of CDOs and reported asTrading account assets. As of March 31, 2008 is comprised of2009, $175 million relating to deals liquidated was held in the following vintages (41% of 2004 or prior) (40% of 2005) and (19% of 2006 or later).trading books.

(5)
The $3.8 billion of High grade exposure as of March 31, 2008 is comprised of the following vintages (6% of 2004 or prior) (14% of 2005) and (80% of 2006 or later).

(6)
The $2.0 billion of Mezzanine exposure as of March 31, 2008 is comprised of the following vintages (8% of 2004 or prior) (41% of 2005) and (51% of 2006 or later).

(7)
ComprisedComposed of net CDO Super Seniorsuper-senior exposures and gross Lendinglending and Structuringstructuring exposures.

(8)(7)
SFAS 157 adjustment related to counterparty credit risk.

Subprime-Related Direct Exposure inSecurities and Banking

The Company had approximately $29.1$10.2 billion in net U.S. subprime-related direct exposures in itsSecurities and Banking S&B business at March 31, 2008.2009.

        The exposure consisted of (a) approximately $22.7$8.5 billion of net exposures in the super senior tranches (i.e., the most senior tranches) of collateralized debt obligationsCDOs, which are collateralized by asset-backed securities, derivatives on asset-backed securities, or both (ABS CDOs), and (b) approximately $6.4$1.7 billion of subprime-related exposures in its lending and structuring business.

Direct ABS CDO Super Senior Exposures

        The net $22.7$8.5 billion in ABS CDO super senior exposures as of March 31, 20082009 is collateralized primarily by subprime residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS), derivatives on RMBS, or both. These exposures include $16.8$7.6 billion in commercial paper (ABCP) issued as the super senior tranches of ABS CDOs initially issued as commercial paper (ABCP) and approximately $5.9 billion$900 million of other super senior tranches of ABS CDOs.

        Citigroup's CDO super senior subprime direct exposures $22.7 billion at March 31, 2008, are Level 3 assets. The valuation of the high-grade and mezzanine ABS CDO positions uses trader prices based on the underlying assets of each high-grade and mezzanine ABS CDO. Unlike the ABCP- and CDO-squared positions, the high-grade and mezzanine positions are now largely hedged through the ABX and bond short positions, which are, by necessity, trader priced. This results in closer symmetry in the way these long and short positions are valued by the Company. Citigroup intends to use trader marks to value this portion of the portfolio going forward so long as it remains largely hedged.

        The valuation of the ABCP- and CDO-squared positions are subject to valuation based on significant unobservable inputs. Accordingly, fairFair value of these exposures is based on estimates of future cash flows from the mortgage loans underlying the assets of the of the ABS CDOs. To determine the performance of the underlying mortgage loan portfolios, , the Company estimates the prepayments, defaults and loss severities based on a number of macro-economicmacroeconomic factors, including housing price changes, unemployment rates, and interest rates, and borrower and loan attributes, such as age, credit scores, documentation status, loan-to-value (LTV) ratios and debt-to-income (DTI) ratios. The model is calibrated using available mortgage loan information including historical loan performance. In addition, the methodology estimates the impact of geographic concentration of mortgages and the impact of reported fraud in the origination of subprime mortgages. An appropriate discount rate is then applied to the cash flows generated for each super senior ABS CDO tranches,ABCP- and CDO-squared tranche, in order to estimate its fair value under current fair value.market conditions.

        When necessary, the valuation methodology used by Citigroup is refined and the inputs used for the purposes of estimation are modified, in part, to reflect ongoing market developments. More specifically, two refinementsthe inputs of home price appreciation (HPA) assumptions and delinquency data were made during the first quarter of 2008:updated along with discount rates that are based upon a more direct method of calculating estimated housing-price changes and a more


refined method for calculating the discount rate. During the fourth quarter 2007,Table of Contents

weighted average combination of implied spreads from single-name ABS bond prices and ABX indices, as well as CLO spreads under current market conditions. The housing-price changes were estimated using a series of factors including projected national housing-price changes. Duringforward-looking projection, which incorporated the first quarter of 2008 housing-price changes were estimated using a forward looking projection based on the S&P Case-Shiller Home PriceLoan Performance Index. This change facilitates a more direct estimation of subprime house price changes. The valuation ofIn addition, the Company's direct ABS CDO super senior exposuresmortgage default model also uses recent mortgage performance data, a period of sharp home price declines and high levels of mortgage foreclosures.

        The valuation as of March 31, 20082009, assumes a cumulative decline in U.S. househousing prices from peak to trough of 20%33%. This consistsrate assumes declines of 9.3% and 3.9% in 2009 and 2010, respectively, the remainder of the 9%33% decline observed pre-2008, with additional assumed declineshaving already occurred before the end of 8% and 3% in 2008 and 2009, respectively. Prior to the first quarter of 2008,2008.

        In addition, the discount rate used was based on observable CLO spreads applicable to the assumed rating of each ABS CDO super senior tranche. During the first quarter of 2008, the discount rate wasrates were based on a weighted average combination of the implied spreads from single namedsingle-name ABS bond prices, ABX indices and CLO spreads, depending on vintage and asset types. This refinement was made, in part, in responseTo determine the discount margin, the Company applies the mortgage default model to the combinationbonds underlying the ABX indices and other referenced cash bonds and solves for the discount margin that produces the current market prices of continuing rating agency downgrades of RMBS and ABS CDOs and the absence of observable CLO spreads at the resulting rating levels.those instruments.

        The primary drivers that currently impact the super seniormodel valuations are the discount rates used to calculate the present value of projected cash flows and projected mortgage loan performance. In valuing its direct ABS CDOABCP- and CDO-squared super senior exposures, the Company has made its best estimate of the key inputs that should be used in its valuation methodology. However, the size and nature of these positions as well as current market conditions are such that changes in inputs such as the discount rates used to calculate the present value of the cash flows can have a significant impact on the reported value of these exposures. For instance, each 10 basis point change in the discount rate used generally results in an approximate $90$25 million change in the fair value of the Company's direct ABS CDOABCP- and CDO-squared super senior exposures as atof March 31, 2008.2009. This applies to both decreases in the discount rate (which would increase the value of these assets and reducedecrease reported losses)write-downs) and increases in the discount rate (which would decrease the value of these assets and increase reported losses)write-downs).

        Estimates of the fair value of the CDO super senior exposures depend on market conditions and are subject to further change over time. In addition, while Citigroup believes that the methodology used to value these exposures is reasonable, the methodology is subject to continuing refinement, including those made as a result of market developments. Further, any observable transactions in respect of some or all of these exposures could be employed in the fair valuation process in accordance with and in the manner called for by SFAS 157.

Lending and Structuring Exposures

        The $6.4$1.7 billion of subprime-related exposures includes approximately $0.2$0.1 billion of CDO warehouse inventory and unsold tranches of ABS CDOs, approximately $3.6$1.1 billion of actively managed subprime loans purchased for resale or securitization at a discount to par during 2007 and approximately $2.6$0.5 billion of financing transactions with customers secured by subprime collateral. These amounts represent the fair value as determined based onusing observable inputs and other market data. The majority of the change from the December 31, 2008 balances reflects sales, transfers and liquidations.

        S&B also has trading positions, both long and short, in U.S. subprime RMBS and related products, including ABS CDOs, which are not included in the figures above. The exposure from these positions is actively managed and hedged, although the effectiveness of the hedging products used may vary with material changes in market conditions.


Direct Exposure to Monolines

        In its Securities and Banking business, the Company has exposure to various monoline bond insurers listed in the table below ("Monolines") from hedges on certain investments and from trading positions. The hedges are composed of credit default swaps and other hedge instruments. The Company recorded an additional $1.5 billion in credit market value adjustments during the first quarter of 2008 on the market value exposures to the Monolines as a result of widening credit spreads.

        The following table summarizes the net market value of the Company's direct exposures to and the corresponding notional amount of transactions with the various Monolines as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 in Securities and Banking:

 
 March 31, 2008
  
 
 
 Net Market
Value
Exposure
December 31,
2007

 
In millions of dollars at March 31, 2008
 Net Market
Value
Exposure

 Notional
Amount
of
Transactions

 
Direct Subprime ABS CDO Super Senior:          
AMBAC $2,946 $5,485 $1,815 
FGIC  1,031  1,460  909 
ACA  531  600  438 
Radian      100 
  
 
 
 
Subtotal Direct Subprime ABS CDO Super Senior $4,508 $7,545 $3,262 
  
 
 
 
Trading Assets—Subprime:          
AMBAC $1,207 $1,400 $1,150 
  
 
 
 
Trading Assets—Subprime $1,207 $1,400 $1,150 
  
 
 
 
Trading Assets—Non Subprime:          
MBIA $1,386 $5,874 $395 
FSA      121 
ACA  122  1,938  50 
Assured  47  503  7 
Radian  13  350  5 
AMBAC  (7) 1,759   
  
 
 
 
Trading Assets—Non Subprime $1,571 $14,345 $578 
  
 
 
 
Subtotal Trading Assets $2,778 $15,745 $1,728 
  
 
 
 
Credit Market Value Adjustment $(2,461)   $(967)
  
 
 
 
Total Net Market Value Direct Exposure $4,825    $4,023 
  
 
 
 

        As of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company had $10.5 billion notional amount of hedges against its Direct Subprime ABS CDO Super Senior positions. Of that $10.5 billion, $7.6 billion was purchased from Monolines and is included in notional amount of transactions in the table above. The net market value of the hedges provided by the Monolines against our Direct Subprime ABS CDO Super Senior positions was $4.5 billion as of March 31, 2008 and $3.3 billion as of December 31, 2007.

        In addition, there was $2.8 billion and $1.7 billion of net market value exposure to Monolines related to our trading assets as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. Trading assets include trading positions, both long and short, in U.S. subprime residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) and related products, including ABS CDOs. There were $1.4 billion in notional amount of transactions related to subprime positions with a net market value exposure of $1.2 billion as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007. The notional amount of transactions related to the remaining non-subprime trading assets as of March 31, 2008 was $14.3 billion with a corresponding net market value exposure of $1.6 billion. The $14.3 billion notional amount of transactions comprised $6.1 billion primarily in interest rate swaps with a corresponding net market value exposure of $40 million. The remaining notional amount of $8.2 billion was in the form of credit default swaps and total return swaps with a net market value exposure of $1.531 billion.

        The corresponding amounts for the notional amount of transactions related to the remaining non-subprime trading assets of December 31, 2007 was $11.3 billion with a corresponding net market value exposure of $578 million. The $11.3 billion notional amount of transactions comprised $4.1 billion primarily in interest rate swaps with a corresponding net market value exposure of $34 million. The remaining notional amount of $7.2 billion was in the form of credit default swaps and total return swaps with a net market value of $544 million.

        The net market value exposure, net of payable and receivable positions, represents the market value of the contract as of March 31, 2008. The notional amount of the transactions, including both long and short positions, is used as a reference value to calculate payments. The credit market value adjustment is a downward adjustment to the net market value exposure to a counterparty to reflect the counterparty's creditworthiness.

        In Global Consumer, the Company has purchased mortgage insurance from various monoline mortgage insurers on first mortgage loans. The notional amount of this insurance protection is approximately $600 million with nominal pending claims against this notional amount.

        In addition, Citigroup has indirect exposure to Monolines in various other parts of its businesses. For example, corporate or municipal bonds in the trading business may be insured by the Monolines. In this case, Citigroup is not a party to the insurance contract. The previous table does not capture this type of indirect exposure to the Monolines.

Exposure to Commercial Real Estate

        In itsSecurities and Banking and Alternative Investments businesses, the        The Company, through its business activities and as a capital markets participant, incurs exposures that are directly or indirectly tied to the global commercial real estate market. These exposures are represented primarily by the following three categories:

        (1)Assets held at fair value:value include: $5.7 billion, of which approximately $16$5.1 billion ofare securities, loans and other items linked to commercial real estate that are carried at fair value as Tradingtrading account assets, approximately $5$0.1 billion of commercial real estate loans and loan commitments classified aswhich are held-for-sale, and measured at the lower of cost or market (LOCOM), and approximately $2$0.5 billion ofwhich are securities backed by commercial real estate carried at fair value as available-for-sale Investments.investments. Changes in fair value for these Tradingtrading account assets and held-for-sale loans and loan commitments are reported in current earnings, while changes in fair value for these available for sale Investmentsavailable-for-sale investments are reported in OCI with other than temporaryother-than-temporary impairments reported in current earnings.


        The majority of these exposures are classified as Level 3 in the fair valuefair-value hierarchy. In recent months, weakeningWeakening activity in the trading markets for some of these instruments resulted in reduced liquidity, thereby decreasing the observable inputs for such valuations, and could have an adverse impact on how these instruments are valued in the future if such conditions persist. Changes in

        (2)Assets held at amortized cost include approximately $2.0 billion of securities classified as held-to-maturity and $23.8 billion of loans and commitments. The held-to-maturity securities were classified as such during the valuesfourth quarter of these positions2008 and were previously classified as either trading or available for sale. They are recognized through revenues.

        (2)accounted for at amortized cost, subject to other-than-temporary impairment. Loans and commitments: approximately $21 billion of commercial real estate loan exposures, including $12 billion of funded loans that are classified as held-for investment and $9 billion of unfunded loan commitments all of which are recorded at amortized cost, less loan loss reserves. The impact from changes in credit is reflected in the calculation of the allowance for loan losses and in net credit losses.

        (3)Equity and other investments: Approximately $6investments include approximately $4.6 billion of equity and other investments such as limited partner fund investments.investments which are accounted for under the equity method, which recognizes gains or losses based on the investor's share of the net income of the investee.


Table of Contents

Direct Exposure to Monolines

        In its S&B business, the Company has exposure to various monoline bond insurers (Monolines), listed in the table below, from hedges on certain investments and from trading positions. The hedges are composed of credit default swaps and other hedge instruments. The Company recorded an additional $1.1 billion in downward CVA related to exposure to Monolines during the first quarter of 2009, bringing the total CVA balance to $5.4 billion.

        The following table summarizes the market value of the Company's direct exposures to and the corresponding notional amounts of transactions with the various Monolines as well as the aggregate credit valuation adjustment associated with these exposures as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 in S&B:

 
 March 31, 2009 December 31, 2008 
In millions of dollars Fair-
value
exposure
 Notional
amount
of
transactions
 Fair-
value
exposure
 Notional
amount
of
transactions
 

Direct subprime ABS CDO super senior:

             

Ambac

 $4,649 $5,352 $4,461 $5,357 
          

Subtotal direct subprime ABS CDO super senior

 $4,649 $5,352 $4,461 $5,357 
          

Trading assets—non-subprime:

             

MBIA

 $2,209 $4,567 $1,924 $4,040 

FSA

  294  1,119  204  1,126 

Assured

  147  454  141  465 

Radian

  39  150  58  150 

Ambac

  19  821  21  1,106 
          

Subtotal trading assets—non-subprime

 $2,708 $7,111 $2,348 $6,887 
          

Total gross fair-value direct exposure

 $7,357    $6,809    

Credit valuation adjustment

 $(5,370)   $(4,279)   
          

Total net fair-value direct exposure

 $1,987    $2,530    
          

        The fair-value exposure, net of payable and receivable positions, represents the market value of the contract as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, excluding the CVA. The notional amount of the transactions, including both long and short positions, is used as a reference value to calculate payments. The credit valuation adjustment is a downward adjustment to the fair-value exposure to a counterparty to reflect the counterparty's creditworthiness in respect of the obligations in question.

        Credit valuation adjustments are based on credit spreads and on estimates of the terms and timing of the payment obligations of the Monolines. Timing in turn depends on estimates of the performance of the transactions to which the Company's exposure relates, estimates of whether and when liquidation of such transactions may occur and other factors, each considered in the context of the terms of the Monolines' obligations.

        As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had $6.6 billion and $6.9 billion, respectively, in notional amount of hedges against its direct subprime ABS CDO super senior positions. Of those amounts, $5.4 billion and $5.4 billion, respectively, were purchased from Monolines and are included in the notional amount of transactions in the table above.

        With respect to Citi's trading assets, there were $2.7 billion and $2.3 billion of fair-value exposure to Monolines as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. Trading assets include trading positions, both long and short in U.S. subprime RMBS and related products, including ABS CDOs.

        The notional amount of transactions related to the remaining non-subprime trading assets as of March 31, 2009, was $7.1 billion. The $7.1 billion notional amount of transactions comprised $2.1 billion primarily in interest-rate swaps with a corresponding fair value exposure of $10 million. The remaining notional amount of $5.0 billion was in the form of credit default swaps and total return swaps with a fair value exposure of $2.7 billion.

        The notional amount of transactions related to the remaining non-subprime trading assets at December 31, 2008, was $6.9 billion with a corresponding fair value exposure of $2.3 billion. The $6.9 billion notional amount of transactions comprised $1.8 billion primarily in interest-rate swaps with a fair value exposure of $3.9 million. The remaining notional amount of $5.1 billion was in the form of credit default swaps and total return swaps with a fair value of $2.3 billion.

        The Company has purchased mortgage insurance from various monoline mortgage insurers on first mortgage loans. The notional amount of this insurance protection was approximately $300 million and $400 million as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, with nominal pending claims against this notional amount.

        In addition, Citigroup has indirect exposure to Monolines in various other parts of its businesses. Indirect exposure includes circumstances in which the Company is not a contractual counterparty to the Monolines, but instead owns securities which may benefit from embedded credit enhancements provided by a Monoline. For example, corporate or municipal bonds in the trading business may be insured by the Monolines. The previous table does not capture this type of indirect exposure to the Monolines.


CITIGROUP Table of Contents

Highly Leveraged Financing Transactions

        Highly leveraged financing commitments are agreements that provide funding to a borrower with higher levels of debt (measured by the ratio of debt capital to equity capital of the borrower) than is generally the case for other companies. In recent years through mid-2008, highly leveraged financing had been commonly employed in corporate acquisitions, management buy-outs and similar transactions.

        In these financings, debt service (that is, principal and interest payments) absorbs a significant portion of the cash flows generated by the borrower's business. Consequently, the risk that the borrower may not be able to meet its debt obligations is greater. Due to this risk, the interest rates and fees charged for this type of financing are generally higher than for other types of financing.

        Prior to funding, highly leveraged financing commitments are assessed for impairment in accordance with SFAS 5, and losses are recorded when they are probable and reasonably estimable. For the portion of loan commitments that relates to loans that will be held for investment, loss estimates are made based on the borrower's ability to repay the facility according to its contractual terms. For the portion of loan commitments that relates to loans that will be held for sale, loss estimates are made in reference to current conditions in the resale market (both interest rate risk and credit risk are considered in the estimate). Loan origination, commitment, underwriting and other fees are netted against any recorded losses.

        Citigroup generally manages the risk associated with highly leveraged financings it has entered into by seeking to sell a majority of its exposures to the market prior to or shortly after funding. In certain cases, all or a portion of a highly leveraged financing to be retained is hedged with credit derivatives or other hedging instruments. Thus, when a highly leveraged financing is funded, Citigroup records the resulting loan as follows:

        Due to the dislocation of the credit markets and the reduced market interest in higher-risk/higher-yield instruments since the latter half of 2007, liquidity in the market for highly leveraged financings has been limited. This has resulted in the Company's recording pretax write-downs on funded and unfunded highly leveraged finance exposures of $247 million in the first quarter of 2009 and $4.9 billion in full year 2008.

        Citigroup's exposures to highly leveraged financing commitments totaled $9.5 billion at March 31, 2009 ($9.0 billion funded and $0.5 billion in unfunded commitments), reflecting a decrease of $0.5 billion from December 31, 2008.

        In 2008, the Company completed the transfer of approximately $12 billion of loans to third parties, of which $8.5 billion relates to highly leveraged loan commitments. In these transactions, the third parties purchased subordinate interests backed by the transferred loans. These subordinate interests absorb first loss on the transferred loans and provide the third parties with control of the loans. The Company retained senior debt securities backed by the transferred loans. These transactions were accounted for as sales of the transferred loans. The loans were removed from the balance sheet and the retained securities are classified as Available-for-sale securities on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet.

        In addition, the Company purchased protection on the senior debt securities from the third-party subordinate interest holders via total return swaps (TRS). The counterparty credit risk in the TRS is protected through margin agreements that provide for both initial margin and additional margin at specified triggers. Due to the initial cash margin received, the existing margin requirements on the TRS, and the substantive subordinate investments made by third parties, the Company believes that the transactions largely mitigate the Company's risk related to the transferred loans. The Company's sole remaining exposure to the transferred loans are the senior debt securities, which have an amortized cost basis of $6.3 billion and fair value of $4.7 billion at March 31, 2009, and the receivables under the TRS, which have a fair value of $1.5 billion at March 31, 2009. The change in the value of the retained senior debt securities that are classified as Available-for-sale securities are recorded in AOCI as they are deemed temporary. The offsetting change in the total return swaps are recorded as cash flow hedges within AOCI. See Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.


Table of Contents


DERIVATIVES

        Presented below are the notional and the mark-to-market receivables and payables for Citigroup's derivative exposures as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008:

Notionals(1)



 Trading
derivatives(2)

 Asset/liability
management hedges(3)


 Trading
derivatives(2)
 Non-trading
Derivatives(3)
 
In millions of dollars

In millions of dollars

 March 31,
2008

 December 31,
2007

 March 31,
2008

 December 31,
2007

In millions of dollars March 31,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 March 31,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 
Interest rate contractsInterest rate contracts        

Interest rate contracts

 
Swaps $18,977,760 $16,433,117 $607,524 $521,783

Swaps

 $13,903,004 $15,096,293 $274,692 $306,501 
Futures and forwards 2,345,714 1,811,599 180,841 176,146

Futures and forwards

 3,262,752 2,619,952 97,827 118,440 
Written options 3,667,458 3,479,071 23,061 16,741

Written options

 2,970,815 2,963,280 18,038 20,255 
Purchased options 3,871,563 3,639,075 119,537 167,080

Purchased options

 3,045,784 3,067,443 45,244 38,344 
 
 
 
 
         
Total interest rate contract notionalsTotal interest rate contract notionals $28,862,495 $25,362,862 $930,963 $881,750

Total interest rate contract notionals

 $23,182,355 $23,746,968 $435,801 $483,540 
 
 
 
 
         
Foreign exchange contractsForeign exchange contracts        

Foreign exchange contracts

 
Swaps $1,012,926 $1,062,267 $70,257 $75,622

Swaps

 $855,791 $882,327 $69,473 $62,491 
Futures and forwards 2,936,731 2,795,180 42,887 46,732

Futures and forwards

 1,853,854 2,165,377 34,561 40,694 
Written options 744,996 653,535 719 292

Written options

 435,205 483,036 9,258 3,286 
Purchased options 732,388 644,744 988 686

Purchased options

 480,574 539,164 292 676 
 
 
 
 
         
Total foreign exchange contract notionalsTotal foreign exchange contract notionals $5,427,041 $5,155,726 $114,851 $123,332

Total foreign exchange contract notionals

 $3,625,424 $4,069,904 $113,584 $107,147 
 
 
 
 
         
Equity contractsEquity contracts        

Equity contracts

 
Swaps $149,913 $140,256 $ $

Swaps

 $73,126 $98,315 $ $ 
Futures and forwards 34,543 29,233  

Futures and forwards

 14,060 17,390   
Written options 775,271 625,157  

Written options

 470,176 507,327   
Purchased options 746,779 567,030  

Purchased options

 442,612 471,532   
 
 
 
 
         
Total equity contract notionalsTotal equity contract notionals $1,706,506 $1,361,676 $ $

Total equity contract notionals

 $999,974 $1,094,564 $ $ 
 
 
 
 
         
Commodity and other contractsCommodity and other contracts        

Commodity and other contracts

 
Swaps $35,346 $29,415 $ $

Swaps

 $22,516 $44,020 $ $ 
Futures and forwards 82,820 66,860  

Futures and forwards

 72,103 60,625   
Written options 25,563 27,087  

Written options

 29,722 31,395   
Purchased options 29,347 30,168  

Purchased options

 33,303 32,892   
 
 
 
 
         
Total commodity and other contract notionalsTotal commodity and other contract notionals $173,076 $153,530 $ $

Total commodity and other contract notionals

 $157,644 $168,932 $ $ 
 
 
 
 
         
Credit derivatives(4)Credit derivatives(4)        

Credit derivatives(4)

 
Citigroup as the Guarantor:        

Citigroup as the Guarantor:

 
 Credit default swaps $1,857,744 $1,755,440 $ $ 

Credit default swaps

 $1,404,588 $1,441,117 $ $ 
 Total return swaps 7,165 12,121   

Total return swaps

 1,203 1,905   
 Credit default options 85 276   

Credit default options

 340 258   
Citigroup as the Beneficiary:        

Citigroup as the Beneficiary:

        
 Credit default swaps $2,021,534 $1,890,611 $ $ 

Credit default swaps

 1,514,613 1,560,087   
 Total return swaps 21,226 15,895   

Total return swaps

 22,347 29,990 6,321 8,103 
 Credit default options 187 450   

Credit default options

 216 135   
 
 
 
 
         
Total credit derivativesTotal credit derivatives $3,907,941 $3,674,793 $ $

Total credit derivatives

 $2,943,307 $3,033,492 $6,321 $8,103 
 
 
 
 
         
Total derivative notionalsTotal derivative notionals $40,077,059 $35,708,587 $1,045,814 $1,005,082

Total derivative notionals

 $30,908,704 $32,113,860 $555,706 $598,790 
 
 
 
 
         

See the following page for footnotes

[Table Continuescontinues on the following page.]


Table of Contents


Mark-to-Market (MTM) Receivables/Payables

 
 Derivatives
receivables—MTM

 Derivatives
payables—MTM

 
In millions of dollars

 March 31,
2008

 December 31,
2007

 March 31,
2008

 December 31,
2007

 
Trading Derivatives(2)             
 Interest rate contracts $382,454 $269,400 $374,712 $257,329 
 Foreign exchange contracts  123,719  77,942  118,963  71,991 
 Equity contracts  31,075  27,934  49,619  66,916 
 Commodity and other contracts  12,380  8,540  12,929  8,887 
 Credit derivatives:             
  Citigroup as the Guarantor  3,425  4,967  139,560  73,103 
  Citigroup as the Beneficiary  150,478  78,426  3,715  11,191 
  
 
 
 
 
  Total $703,531 $467,209 $699,498 $489,417 
  Less: Netting agreements, cash collateral and market value adjustments  (579,050) (390,328) (573,515) (385,876)
  
 
 
 
 
  Net Receivables/Payables $124,481 $76,881 $125,983 $103,541 
  
 
 
 
 
Asset/Liability Management Hedges(3)             
 Interest rate contracts $6,157 $8,529 $9,973 $7,176 
 Foreign exchange contracts  992  1,634  769  972 
  
 
 
 
 
  Total $7,149 $10,163 $10,742 $8,148 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 Derivatives
receivables—MTM
 Derivatives
payables—MTM
 
In millions of dollars March 31,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 March 31,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

Trading derivatives(2)

             
 

Interest rate contracts

 $615,052 $667,597 $595,184 $654,178 
 

Foreign exchange contracts

  106,245  153,197  114,285  160,628 
 

Equity contracts

  31,061  35,717  49,126  57,292 
 

Commodity and other contracts

  26,582  23,924  24,832  22,473 
 

Credit derivatives:(4)

             
  

Citigroup as the Guarantor

  6,796  5,890  206,411  198,233 
  

Citigroup as the Beneficiary

  231,023  222,461  6,375  5,476 
 

Cash collateral paid/received

  65,165  63,866  61,740  65,010 
          

Total

 $1,081,924 $1,172,652 $1,057,953 $1,163,290 
          
 

Less: Netting agreements and market value adjustments

  (986,064) (1,057,363) (976,815) (1,046,505)
          

Net receivables/payables

 $95,860 $115,289 $81,138 $116,785 
          

Non-trading derivatives

             
 

Interest rate contracts

 $10,078 $14,755 $5,070 $7,742 
 

Foreign exchange contracts

  4,853  2,408  3,609  3,746 
 

Credit Derivatives

  1,597       
          

Total

 $16,528 $17,163 $8,679 $11,488 
          

(1)
Includes the notional amounts for long and short derivative positions.

(2)
Trading Derivatives include proprietary positions, as well as hedging derivatives instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting in accordance with SFAS No. 133,"Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" (SFAS 133).

(3)
Asset/Liability Management Hedges include only those end-user derivative instruments whereReclassified to conform to the changes in market value are recorded to other assets or other liabilities.current period's presentation.

(4)
Credit Derivatives are arrangements designed to allow one party (the "beneficiary") to transfer the credit risk of a "reference asset" to another party (the "guarantor"). These arrangements allow a guarantor to assume the credit risk associated with the reference assets without directly purchasing it. The Company has entered into credit derivatives positions for purposes such as risk management, yield enhancement, reduction of credit concentrations, and diversification of overall risk.

Fair Valuation Adjustments for Derivatives

        The fair value adjustments applied by the Company to its derivative carrying values consist of the following items:

        The Company's CVA methodology comprises two steps. First, the exposure profile for each counterparty is determined using the terms of all individual derivative positions and a Monte Carlo simulation or other quantitative analysis to generate a series of expected cash flows at future points in time. The calculation of this exposure profile considers the effect of credit risk mitigants, including pledged cash or other collateral and any legal right of offset that exists with a counterparty through arrangements such as netting agreements. Individual derivative contracts that are subject to an enforceable master netting agreement with a counterparty are aggregated for this purpose, since it is those aggregate net cash flows that are subject to nonperformance risk. This process identifies specific, point in time future cash flows that are subject to nonperformance risk, rather than using the current recognized net asset or liability as a basis to measure the CVA. Second, market-based views of default probabilities derived from observed credit spreads in the credit default swap market, are applied to the expected future cash flows determined in step one. Own-credit CVA is determined using Citi-specific CDS spreads for the relevant tenor. Generally, counterparty CVA is determined using CDS spread indices for each credit rating and tenor. For certain identified facilities where individual analysis is practicable (for example, exposures to monoline counterparties) counterparty-specific CDS spreads are used.

        The CVA adjustment is designed to incorporate a market view of the credit risk inherent in the derivative portfolio as required by SFAS 157. However, most derivative instruments are negotiated bilateral contracts and are not commonly transferred to third parties. Derivative instruments are normally settled contractually, or if terminated early, are terminated at a value negotiated bilaterally between the counterparties. Therefore, the CVA (both counterparty and own-credit) may not be realized upon a settlement or termination in the normal course of business. In addition, all or a portion of the credit valuation adjustments may be reversed or otherwise adjusted in future periods in the event of changes in the credit risk of Citi or its counterparties, or changes in the credit mitigants (collateral and netting agreements) associated with the derivative instruments. Historically, Citigroup's credit spreads have moved in tandem with general counterparty credit spreads, thus providing offsetting CVAs affecting revenue. However, in the first quarter of 2009, Citigroup's credit spreads widened and


Table of Contents

counterparty credit spreads generally narrowed, each of which positively affected revenues.

        The table below summarizes pretax gains (losses) related to changes in credit valuation adjustments on derivative instruments for the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and 2008:

 
 Credit valuation
adjustment gain (loss)
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

Non-monoline counterparties

 $166 $(1,790)

Citigroup (own)

  2,572  1,513 
      

Net non-monoline CVA

 $2,738 $(277)

Monoline counterparties

  (1,091) (1,491)
      

Total CVA—derivative instruments

 $1,647 $(1,768)
      

        The table below summarizes the CVA applied to the fair value of derivative instruments as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.

 
 Credit valuation adjustment
Contra liability
(contra asset)
 
In millions of dollars March 31,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

Non-monoline counterparties

 $(8,100)$(8,266)

Citigroup (own)

  6,183  3,611 
      

Net non-monoline CVA

 $(1,917)$(4,655)

Monoline counterparties(1)

  (5,370) (4,279)
      

Total CVA—derivative instruments

 $(7,287)$(8,934)
     ��

(1)
Certain derivatives with monoline counterparties were terminated during 2008.

        The credit valuation adjustment amounts shown above relate solely to the derivative portfolio, and do not include:

Credit Derivatives

        The Company makes markets in and trades a range of credit derivatives, both on behalf of clients as well as for its own account. Through these contracts the Company either purchases or writes protection on either a single-name or portfolio basis. The Company uses credit derivatives to help mitigate credit risk in its corporate loan portfolio and other cash positions, to take proprietary trading positions, and to facilitate client transactions.

        Credit derivatives generally require that the seller of credit protection make payments to the buyer upon the occurrence of predefined events (settlement triggers). These settlement triggers are defined by the form of the derivative and the referenced credit and are generally limited to the market standard of failure to pay on indebtedness and bankruptcy of the reference credit and, in a more limited range of transactions, debt restructuring. Credit derivative transactions referring to emerging market reference credits will also typically include additional settlement triggers to cover the acceleration of indebtedness and the risk of repudiation or a payment moratorium. In certain transactions on a portfolio of referenced credits or asset-backed securities, the seller of protection may not be required to make payment until a specified amount of losses has occurred with respect to the portfolio and/or may only be required to pay for losses up to a specified amount.


Table of Contents

        The following tables summarize the key characteristics of the Company's credit derivative portfolio by activity, counterparty and derivative form as of March 31, 20082009 and December 31, 2007:2008:

March 31, 2008:2009:


 Market values
 Notionals
 Fair values Notionals 
In millions of dollars

 Receivable Payable Beneficiary Guarantor 
Receivable
 Payable
 Beneficiary
 Guarantor

By Activity:

 
Credit portfolio $63 $1,462 $91,909 $ $2,799 $28 $55,057 $ 
Dealer/client 153,840 141,813 1,951,038 1,864,994 236,617 212,758 1,488,440 1,406,131 
 
 
 
 
         
Total $153,903 $143,275 $2,042,947 $1,864,994

Total by Activity

 $239,416 $212,786 $1,543,497 $1,406,131 
 
 
 
 
         

By Industry/Counterparty:

 
Bank $65,458 $69,937 $1,115,287 $1,050,201 $131,386 $127,684 $965,983 $919,354 
Broker-dealer 49,613 49,943 707,879 646,173 60,990 57,443 380,412 345,582 
Monoline 7,360 113 15,660 961 7,434 91 9,942 139 
Non-financial 524 901 11,458 10,390 6,029 5,435 4,123 5,327 
Insurance and other financial institutions 30,948 22,381 192,663 157,269 33,577 22,133 183,037 135,729 
 
 
 
 
         
Total $153,903 $143,275 $2,042,947 $1,864,994

Total by Industry/Counterparty

 $239,416 $212,786 $1,543,497 $1,406,131 
 
 
 
 
         

By Instrument:

 
Credit default swaps and options $152,973 $142,527 $2,021,721 $1,857,829 $232,009 $212,166 $1,514,829 $1,404,928 
Total return swaps and other 930 748 21,226 7,165 7,407 620 28,668 1,203 
 
 
 
 
         
Total $153,903 $143,275 $2,042,947 $1,864,994

Total by Instrument

 $239,416 $212,786 $1,543,497 $1,406,131 
 
 
 
 
         


December 31, 2007(1):2008:

 
 Market values
 Notionals
In millions of dollars

 Receivable
 Payable
 Beneficiary
 Guarantor
Credit portfolio $626 $129 $91,228 $
Dealer/client  82,767  84,165  1,815,728  1,767,837
  
 
 
 
Total $83,393 $84,294 $1,906,956 $1,767,837
  
 
 
 
Bank $28,571 $34,425 $1,035,217 $970,831
Broker-dealer  28,183  31,519  633,745  585,549
Monoline  5,044  88  15,064  1,243
Non-financial  220  331  3,682  4,253
Insurance and other financial institutions  21,375  17,931  219,248  205,961
  
 
 
 
Total $83,393 $84,294 $1,906,956 $1,767,837
  
 
 
 
Credit default swaps and options $82,752 $83,015 $1,891,061 $1,755,716
Total return swaps and other  641  1,279  15,895  12,121
  
 
 
 
Total $83,393 $84,294 $1,906,956 $1,767,837
  
 
 
 

(1)
Reclassified to conform to current period's presentation.
 
 Fair values Notionals 
In millions of dollars Receivable Payable Beneficiary Guarantor 

By Activity:

             

Credit portfolio

 $3,257 $15 $71,131 $ 

Dealer/client

  225,094  203,694  1,527,184  1,443,280 
          

Total by Activity

 $228,351 $203,709 $1,598,315 $1,443,280 
          

By Industry/Counterparty:

             

Bank

 $128,042 $121,811 $996,248 $943,949 

Broker-dealer

  59,321  56,858  403,501  365,664 

Monoline

  6,886  91  9,973  139 

Non-financial

  4,874  2,561  5,608  7,540 

Insurance and other financial institutions

  29,228  22,388  182,985  125,988 
          

Total by Industry/Counterparty

 $228,351 $203,709 $1,598,315 $1,443,280 
          

By Instrument:

             

Credit default swaps and options

 $221,159 $203,220 $1,560,222 $1,441,375 

Total return swaps and other

  7,192  489  38,093  1,905 
          

Total by Instrument

 $228,351 $203,709 $1,598,315 $1,443,280 
          

        The marketfair values shown are prior to the application of any netting agreements, cash collateral, and market or credit value adjustments.

        The Company actively participates in trading a variety of credit derivatives products as both an active two-way market-maker for clients and to manage credit risk. During 2007, Citigroup and the industry experienced a material increase in trading volumes. The volatility and liquidity challenges in the credit markets during the third and fourth quarters drove derivatives trading volumes as credit derivatives became the instrument of choice for managing credit risk. The majority of this activity was transacted with other financial intermediaries, including both banks and broker-dealers.

        During the full year 2007, the total notional amount of protection purchased and sold increased $906 billion and $824 billion, respectively, and by various market participants. The total market value increase of $69 billion for each protection purchased and sold was primarily due to an increase in volume growth of $63 billion and $62 billion, and market spread changes of $6 billion and $7 billion for protection purchased and sold, respectively.

        During the first quarter of 2008, the total notional amount of protection purchased and sold increased $136 billion and $97 billion, respectively as volume continued to grow. The corresponding market value increased $71 billion for protection purchased and $59 billion for protection sold. These market value increases were primarily due to an increase in volume growth of $17 billion and $ 8 billion, and changes in market spreads of $54 billion and $51 billion, respectively.

The Company generally has a mismatch between the total notional amounts of protection purchased and sold and it may hold the reference assets directly, rather than entering into offsetting credit derivative contracts as and when desired. The open risk exposures from credit derivative contracts are largely matched after certain cash positions in reference assets are considered and after notional amounts are adjusted, either to a duration-based equivalent basis or to reflect the level of subordination in tranched structures.

        The Company actively monitors its counterparty credit risk in credit derivative contracts. Approximately 84% and 77%91% of the gross receivables as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007,


respectively,2009 are from counterparties with which the Company maintains collateral agreements. A majority of the Company's top 15 counterparties (by receivable balance owed to the Company) are banks, financial institutions or other dealers. Contracts with these counterparties do not include ratings-based termination events. However, counterparty rating downgrades may have an incremental effect by lowering the threshold at which the Company may call for additional collateral. A number of the remaining significant counterparties are monolines. See page 24 for a discussion


Table of the Company's exposure to monolines. The master agreements with these monoline insurance counterparties are generally unsecured, and the few ratings-based triggers (if any) generally provide the ability to terminate only upon significant downgrade. As with all derivative contracts, the Company considers counterparty credit risk in the valuation of its positions and recognizes credit valuation adjustments as appropriate. Recent reports and credit agency actions and announcements suggest that ratings downgrades of one or more monoline insurers are being contemplated.Contents

MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESS

        Market risk encompasses liquidity risk and price risk, both of which arise in the normal course of business of a global financial intermediary. Liquidity risk is the risk that an entity may be unable to meet a financial commitment to a customer, creditor, or investor when due. Liquidity risk is discussed in the "Capital Resources and Liquidity" section beginning on page 38.Liquidity." Price risk is the earnings risk from changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity and commodity prices, and in their implied volatilities. Price risk arises in non-trading portfolios, as well as in trading portfolios.


Interest Rate Exposure (IRE)

        The exposures in the following table represent the approximate annualized risk to Net Interest Revenue (NIR) assuming an unanticipated parallel instantaneous 100bp change, as well as a more gradual 100bp (25bps per quarter) parallel change in rates as compared with the market forward interest rates in selected currencies.

 
 March 31, 2009 December 31, 2008 March 31, 2008 
In millions of dollars Increase Decrease Increase Decrease Increase Decrease 

U.S. dollar

                   

Instantaneous change

 $(1,654)$1,543 $(801)$391 $(1,423)$1,162 

Gradual change

 $(888)$660 $(456)$81 $(781)$666 
              

Mexican peso

                   

Instantaneous change

 $(20)$20 $(18)$18 $(20)$20 

Gradual change

 $(14)$14 $(14)$14 $4 $(4)
              

Euro

                   

Instantaneous change

 $11 $(12)$(56)$57 $(51)$51 

Gradual change

 $12 $(12)$(43)$43 $(39)$39 
              

Japanese yen

                   

Instantaneous change

 $195  NM $172  NM $65  NM 

Gradual change

 $122  NM $51  NM $43  NM 
              

Pound sterling

                   

Instantaneous change

 $1 $(5)$(1)$1 $(17)$17 

Gradual change

 $(1)$1 $ $ $(4)$4 
              

        The exposures in the following tables do not include Interest Rate Exposures (IREs) for the Nikko Cordial portion of Citigroup's operations inJapan due to the unavailability of information. Nikko Cordial's IRE is primarily denominated in Japanese yen.

 
 March 31, 2008
 December 31, 2007
 March 31, 2007
 
In millions of dollars

 
 Increase
 Decrease
 Increase
 Decrease
 Increase
 Decrease
 
U.S. dollar                   
Instantaneous change $(1,423)$1,162 $(940)$837 $(677)$470 
Gradual change $(781)$666 $(527)$540 $(335)$348 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mexican peso                   
Instantaneous change $(20)$20 $(25)$25 $21 $(21)
Gradual change $4 $(4)$(17)$17 $21 $(21)
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
Euro                   
Instantaneous change $(51)$51 $(63)$63 $(123)$123 
Gradual change $(39)$39 $(32)$32 $(57)$57 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
Japanese yen                   
Instantaneous change $65  NM $67  NM $(38) NM 
Gradual change $43  NM $43  NM $(26) NM 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pound sterling                   
Instantaneous change $(17)$17 $(16)$16 $(22)$22 
Gradual change $(4)$4 $(4)$4 $(11)$11 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 

NM
Not meaningful. A 100 basis point decrease in interest rates would imply negative rates for the Japanese yen yield curve.

        The changes in the U.S. dollar interest rate exposures from December 31, 2007 primarily reflect movements in customer-related asset and liability mix, as well as Citigroup's2008 are related to Citi's view of prevailing interest rates.rates and incremental assets added to the non-trading portfolio that were previously held as mark to market securities.

        The following table shows the risk to NIR from six different changes in the implied forward rates. Each scenario assumes that the rate change will occur on a gradual basis every three months over the course of one year.


 Scenario 1
 Scenario 2
 Scenario 3
 Scenario 4
 Scenario 5
 Scenario 6
  Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4 Scenario 5 Scenario 6 
Overnight rate change (bp)  100 200 (200) (100)    100 200 (200) (100)  
10-year rate change (bp) (100)  100 (100)  100  (100)  100 (100)  100 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Impact to net interest revenue(in millions of dollars) $(149)$(686)$(1,479)$1,169 $620 $(108) 
$

(98

)

$

(748

)

$

(1,337

)

$

616
 
$

411
 
$

(161

)
 
 
 
 
 
 
              

Table of Contents

Value at Risk (VAR)

        For Citigroup's major trading centers, the aggregate pretax VAR in the trading portfolios was $393$292 million, $191$319 million, and $122$393 million at March 31, 2008,2009, December 31, 2007,2008, and March 31, 2007,2008, respectively. Daily exposures averaged $341$291 million during the first quarter of 20082009 and ranged from $308$251 million to $393$335 million.

The following table summarizes VAR to Citigroup in the trading portfolios at March 31, 2008,2009, December 31, 2007,2008, and March 31, 2007,2008, including the Total VAR, the specific risk only component of VAR, and Total—Generalgeneral market factors only VAR, along with the quarterly averages:

In million of dollars

 March 31,
2008(1)

 First Quarter
2008 Average(1)

 December 31,
2007

 Fourth Quarter
2007 Average

 March 31,
2007

 First Quarter
2007 Average

 
Interest rate $281 $283 $89 $97 $99 $95 
Foreign exchange  77  45  28  28  29  28 
Equity  235  125  150  129  77  70 
Commodity  53  47  45  45  27  28 
Covariance adjustment  (253) (159) (121) (130) (110) (100)
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total—All market risk factors, including general and specific risk $393 $341 $191 $169 $122 $121 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
Specific risk only component $39 $37 $28 $29 $5 $12 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total—General market factors only $354 $304 $163 $140 $117 $109 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 

(1)
The Sub-Prime Group (SPG) exposures, became fully integrated into VAR during the first quarter of 2008, adding approximately $108 million and $166 million to the March 31, 2008 VAR and first quarter of 2008 average VAR, respectively.

In million of dollars March 31,
2009
 First Quarter
2009 Average
 December 31,
2008
 Fourth Quarter
2008 Average
 March 31,
2008
 First Quarter
2008 Average
 

Interest rate

 $239 $272 $320 $272 $281 $283 

Foreign exchange

  38  73  118  80  77  45 

Equity

  144  97  84  94  235  125 

Commodity

  34  22  15  16  53  47 

Covariance adjustment

  (163) (173) (218) (167) (253) (159)
              

Total—All market risk factors, including general and specific risk

 $292 $291 $319 $295 $393 $341 
              

Specific risk only component

 $14 $19 $8 $25 $39 $37 
              

Total—General market factors only

 $278 $272 $311 $270 $354 $304 
              

        The specific risk only component represents the level of equity and debt issuer-specific risk embedded in VAR. Citigroup's specific risk model conforms to the 4x-multiplier treatment and is subject to extensive annual hypothetical back-testing.

        The table below provides the range of VAR in each type of trading portfolio that was experienced during the quarters ended:


 March 31, 2008
 December 31, 2007
 March 31, 2007
In millions of dollars

 March 31, 2009 December 31, 2008 March 31, 2008 
In millions of dollars

Low
 High
 Low
 High
 Low
 High
 Low High Low High Low High 
 $278 $293 $88 $104 $71 $125 $209 $320 $227 $328 $278 $293 
Foreign exchange  23  77  23  37  21  35 29 140 43 130 23 77 
Equity  58  235  106  164  55  85 47 167 68 122 58 235 
Commodity  36  58  33  56  17  34 12 34 12 22 36 58 
 
 
 
 
 
 
             

Table of Contents

OPERATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESS

        Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, peoplesystems or systems,human factors, or from external events. It includes the reputation and franchise risk associated with business practices or market conduct thatin which the Company undertakes.is involved. Operational risk is inherent in Citigroup's global business activities and, as with other risk types, is managed through an overall framework designed to balance strong corporate oversight with checks and balances that include:well-defined independent risk management. This framework includes:

        The goal is to keep operational risk at appropriate levels relative to the characteristics of our businesses, the markets in which we operate, our capital and liquidity, and the competitive, economic and regulatory environment. Notwithstanding these controls, Citigroup incurs operational losses.

Framework

        Citigroup's approach toTo monitor, mitigate and control operational risk, is defined in the Citigroup Riskmaintains a system of comprehensive policies and Control Self-Assessment (RCSA)/Operational Risk Policy.

        The objective of the Policy is to establishhas established a consistent, value-added framework for assessing and communicating operational risk and the overall effectiveness of the internal control environment across Citigroup. An Operational Risk Council has been established to provide oversight for operational risk across Citigroup. The Council's membership includes senior members of the Chief Risk Officer's organization covering multiple dimensions of risk management with representatives of the Business and Regional Chief Risk Officers' organizations and the Business Management Group. The Council's focus is on further advancing operational risk management at Citigroup with focus on proactive identification and mitigation of operational risk and related incidents. The Council works with the business segments and the control functions to help ensure a transparent, consistent and comprehensive framework for managing operational risk globally.

Each major business segment must implement an operational risk process consistent with the requirements of this Policy.

framework. The RCSA standards establish a formal governance structure to provide direction, oversight, and monitoring of Citigroup's RCSA programs. The RCSA standardsprocess for risk and control assessment are applicable to all businesses and staff functions. They establish RCSA as the process whereby important risks inherent in the activities of a business are identified and the effectiveness of the key controls over those risks are evaluated and monitored. RCSA processes facilitate Citigroup's adherence to internal control over financial reporting, regulatory requirements (including Sarbanes-Oxley) FDICIA, the International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards (Basel II), and other corporate initiatives, including Operational Risk Management and alignment of capital assessments withoperational risk management objectives. The entire process is subjectincludes the following steps:

        The operational risk standards facilitate the effective communication and mitigation of operational risk both within and across businesses. As new products and business activities are developed, processes are designed, modified or sourced through alternative means and operational risks are considered. Information about the businesses' operational risk, historical losses, and the control environment is reported by each major business segment and functional area, and summarized for senior managementSenior Management and the Citigroup Board of Directors.

Measurement and Basel II

        To support advanced capital modeling and management, the businesses are required to capture relevant operational risk capital information. An enhanced version of the risk capital model for operational risk has been developed and implemented across the major business segments as a step toward readiness for Basel II capital calculations. The risk capital calculation is designed to qualify as an "Advanced Measurement Approach" (AMA) under Basel II. It uses a combination of internal and external loss data to support statistical modeling of capital requirement estimates, which are then adjusted to reflect qualitative data regarding the operational risk and control environment.

Information Security and Continuity of Business

        Information security and the protection of confidential and sensitive customer data are a priority of Citigroup. The Company has implemented an Information Security Program that complies with the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and other regulatory guidance. The Information Security Program is reviewed and enhanced periodically to address emerging threats to customers' information.

        The Corporate Office of Business Continuity, with the support of senior management,Senior Management, continues to coordinate global preparedness and mitigate business continuity risks by reviewing and testing recovery procedures.


Table of Contents

COUNTRY AND CROSS-BORDER RISK

        The table below shows all countries where total FFIEC cross-border outstandings exceed 0.75% of total Citigroup assets:

March 31, 2008
 December 31, 2007
March 31, 2009March 31, 2009 December 31, 2008 
Cross-Border Claims on Third Parties

Cross-Border Claims on Third Parties

Cross-Border Claims on Third Parties 
In Billions
of U.S. dollars


 Banks
 Public
 Private
 Total
 Trading
and
Short-
Term
Claims

 Investments
in and
Funding of
Local
Franchises

 Total
Cross-
Border
Outstandings

 Commitments
 Total
Cross-
Border
Outstandings

 Commitments
 Banks Public Private Total Trading
and
Short-
Term
Claims
 Investments
in and
Funding of
Local
Franchises
 Total
Cross-
Border
Outstandings
 Commitments Total
Cross-
Border
Outstandings
 Commitments 
India $1.1 $0.2 $11.2 $12.5 $10.3 $21.1 $33.6 $1.3 $39.0 $1.7 $1.0 $ $6.9 $7.9 $5.0 $19.6 $27.5 $1.5 $28.0 $1.6 

South Korea

 2.4 1.0 4.4 7.8 7.6 17.6 25.4 14.3 22.0 15.7 
Germany  10.9  8.3  10.4  29.6  26.9    29.6  40.9  29.3  46.4 9.2 3.0 8.2 20.4 18.5 4.5 24.9 45.9 29.9 48.6 

Cayman Islands

 0.1  22.3 22.4 20.8  22.4 7.2 22.1 8.2 
France  10.1  3.8  12.9  26.8  25.6    26.8  91.6  24.3  107.8 11.9 2.2 7.3 21.4 18.4 0.4 21.8 64.3 21.4 66.4 

United Kingdom

 9.4 0.1 9.0 18.5 16.2  18.5 122.5 26.3 128.3 
Netherlands  6.9  2.1  15.7  24.7  18.9    24.7  16.8  23.1  20.2 5.6 1.6 9.7 16.9 11.5  16.9 64.0 17.7 67.4 
United Kingdom  8.4  0.1  13.6  22.1  20.7    22.1  478.4  24.7  366.0
South Korea  1.9  0.5  3.1  5.5  5.4  16.8  22.3  20.2  21.9  22.0
Spain  3.3  5.7  8.6  17.6  16.4  3.3  20.9  8.3  21.3  7.4

Australia

 1.2  1.4 2.6 1.7 12.5 15.1 24.0 12.5 24.8 
Italy  2.1  8.8  4.1  15.0  14.3  4.5  19.5  5.6  18.8  5.1 0.9 7.5 2.0 10.4 8.6 ��3.5 13.9 17.5 14.7 20.2 

Canada

 1.5 0.3 3.1 4.9 3.7 8.2 13.1 30.8 16.1 36.1 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                     

Table of Contents


INTEREST REVENUE/EXPENSE AND YIELDS

Average Rates- Interest Revenue, Interest Expense, and Net Interest Margin

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

In millions of dollars

In millions of dollars

 1st Qtr.
2008

 4th Qtr.
2007

 1st Qtr.
2007

 % Change
1Q08 vs. 1Q07

 In millions of dollars 1st Qtr.
2009
 4th Qtr.
2008
 1st Qtr.
2008(1)
 Change
1Q09 vs. 1Q08
 
Interest Revenue(1) $29,950 $32,618 $28,174 6%
Interest Expense(2) 16,477 19,993 17,562 (6)

Interest Revenue(2)

Interest Revenue(2)

 $20,609 $23,911 $29,190 (29)%

Interest Expense(3)

Interest Expense(3)

 7,711 10,658 16,122 (52)
 
 
 
 
           
Net Interest Revenue(1)(2) $13,473 $12,625 $10,612 27%

Net Interest Revenue(2)(3)

Net Interest Revenue(2)(3)

 $12,898 $13,253 $13,068 (1)%
 
 
 
 
           
Interest Revenue—Average RateInterest Revenue—Average Rate 6.29% 6.53% 6.56%(27) bps 

Interest Revenue—Average Rate

 5.27% 5.81% 6.24% (97) bps 
Interest Expense—Average RateInterest Expense—Average Rate 3.77% 4.37% 4.55%(78) bps 

Interest Expense—Average Rate

 2.16% 2.79% 3.75% (159) bps 
Net Interest Margin (NIM)Net Interest Margin (NIM) 2.83% 2.53% 2.47%36 bps 

Net Interest Margin (NIM)

 3.30% 3.22% 2.80% 50 bps 
 
 
 
 
           
Interest Rate Benchmarks:Interest Rate Benchmarks:         

Interest Rate Benchmarks:

 
Federal Funds Rate—End of PeriodFederal Funds Rate—End of Period 2.25% 4.25% 5.25%(300) bps 

Federal Funds Rate—End of Period

 0.00-0.25% 0.00-0.25% 2.25% (200+) bps 
 
 
 
 
           
2 Year U.S. Treasury Note—Average Rate2 Year U.S. Treasury Note—Average Rate 2.03% 3.49% 4.76%(273) bps 

2 Year U.S. Treasury Note—Average Rate

 0.90% 1.22% 2.03% (113) bps 
10 Year U.S. Treasury Note—Average Rate10 Year U.S. Treasury Note—Average Rate 3.67% 4.27% 4.68%(101) bps 

10 Year U.S. Treasury Note—Average Rate

 2.74% 3.23% 3.67% (93) bps 
 
 
 
 
           
10 Year vs. 2 Year Spread 164 bps 78 bps (8) bps   

10 Year vs. 2 Year Spread

 184 bps 201 bps 164 bps   
 
 
 
 
           

(1)
Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation and to exclude discontinued operations.

(2)
Excludes taxable equivalent adjustment (based on the U.S. Federalfederal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $48$97 million, $31$159 million, and $15$48 million for the first quarter of 2008,2009, the fourth quarter of 2007,2008 and the first quarter of 2007,2008, respectively.

(2)(3)
Excludes expenses associated with hybrid financial instruments and beneficial interest in consolidated VIEs. These obligations are classified as Long-Term DebtLong-term debt and accounted for at fair value with changes recorded inPrincipal Transactions.transactions.

        A significant portion of the Company's business activities areis based upon gathering deposits and borrowing money and then lending or investing those funds, including market-making activities in tradable securities. Net interest margin (NIM) is calculated by dividing gross interest revenue less gross interest expense by average interest earning assets.

        During the first quarter of 2008,2009, the significantly lower cost of funding more than offset the lower asset yields, resulting in higher Net interest margin.NIM. The widening between the short-term and the long-term spreads as well as the short-term liability sensitive positions contributed to the upward movement of the Net interest margin. OnNIM. The impact of a full quarter of significantly lower Fed Funds target rate affected the assets side, the average yield was negatively impacted by the decline in the rates foryields on all lines and most significantly on our Deposits with banks and Fed Funds Sold as well ason the shift inasset side and the Consumer loan portfolioDeposits and Fed Funds Purchased on the liability side. Additionally, the yield on the floating long-term debt decreased significantly from higher yielding credit card receivables to lower yielding assets such as mortgages and home equity loans.prior quarters.


Table of Contents


AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES—ASSETS(1)(2)(3)(4)



 Average Volume
 Interest Revenue
 % Average Rate
 
 Average Volume Interest Revenue % Average Rate 
In millions of dollars

In millions of dollars

 1st Qtr.
2008

 4th Qtr.
2007

 1st Qtr.
2007

 1st Qtr.
2008

 4th Qtr.
2007

 1st Qtr.
2007

 1st Qtr.
2008

 4th Qtr.
2007

 1st Qtr.
2007

 In millions of dollars 1st Qtr.
2009
 4th Qtr.
2008
 1st Qtr.
2008
 1st Qtr.
2009
 4th Qtr.
2008
 1st Qtr.
2008
 1st Qtr.
2009
 4th Qtr.
2008
 1st Qtr.
2008
 
AssetsAssets                         Assets 
Deposits with banks(4) $65,460 $63,902 $45,306 $805 $825 $709 4.95%5.12%6.35%
Deposits with banks(5)Deposits with banks(5) $170,463 $120,963 $63,314 $432 $759 $784 1.03% 2.50% 4.98%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                     
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell(5)                         
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell(6)Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell(6) 
In U.S. officesIn U.S. offices $177,420 $188,647 $184,069 $1,746 $2,630 $2,879 3.96%5.53%6.34%In U.S. offices $128,004 $141,482 $177,420 $550 $727 $1,746 1.74% 2.04% 3.96%
In offices outside the U.S.(4)  104,895  126,044  109,226  1,426  1,683  1,410 5.47 5.30 5.24 
In offices outside the U.S.(5)In offices outside the U.S.(5) 54,631 68,238 104,895 338 677 1,426 2.51 3.95 5.47 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                     
TotalTotal $282,315 $314,691 $293,295 $3,172 $4,313 $4,289 4.52%5.44%5.93%Total $182,635 $209,720 $282,315 $888 $1,404 $3,172 1.97% 2.66% 4.52%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                     
Trading account assets(6)(7)                         
Trading account assets(7)(8)Trading account assets(7)(8) 
In U.S. officesIn U.S. offices $254,155 $273,007 $236,977 $3,634 $3,962 $2,822 5.75%5.76%4.83%In U.S. offices $147,516 $180,350 $254,155 $1,984 $2,708 $3,634 5.45% 5.97% 5.75%
In offices outside the U.S.(4)  180,714  187,482  133,274  1,165  1,074  1,108 2.59 2.27 3.37 
In offices outside the U.S.(5)In offices outside the U.S.(5) 116,492 128,375 180,714 974 1,184 1,165 3.39 3.67 2.59 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                     
TotalTotal $434,869 $460,489 $370,251 $4,799 $5,036 $3,930 4.44%4.34%4.30%Total $264,008 $308,725 $434,869 $2,958 $3,892 $4,799 4.54% 5.02% 4.44%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                     
Investments(1)Investments(1)                         Investments(1) 
In U.S. officesIn U.S. offices                         In U.S. offices 
Taxable $104,474 $108,548 $160,372 $1,179 $1,343 $2,000 4.54%4.91%5.06%Taxable $121,901 $113,882 $104,474 $1,480 $1,377 $1,179 4.92% 4.81% 4.54%
Exempt from U.S. income tax  13,031  16,196  16,810  159  204  190 4.91 5.00 4.58 Exempt from U.S. income tax 14,574 15,159 13,031 118 180 159 3.28 4.72 4.91 
In offices outside the U.S.(4)  100,866  110,016  107,079  1,361  1,466  1,350 5.43 5.29 5.11 
In offices outside the U.S.(5)In offices outside the U.S.(5) 107,639 90,311 99,762 ��1,578 1,329 1,349 5.95 5.85 5.44 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                     
TotalTotal $218,371 $234,760 $284,261 $2,699 $3,013 $3,540 4.97%5.09%5.05%Total $244,114 $219,352 $217,267 $3,176 $2,886 $2,687 5.28% 5.23% 4.97%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                     
Loans (net of unearned income)(8)                         
Loans (net of unearned income)(9)Loans (net of unearned income)(9) 
Consumer loansConsumer loans                         Consumer loans 
In U.S. officesIn U.S. offices $398,362 $397,386 $362,860 $7,751 $8,393 $7,500 7.83%8.38%8.38%In U.S. offices $356,600 $364,433 $385,485 $6,252 $6,826 $7,528 7.11% 7.45% 7.85%
In offices outside the U.S.(4)  199,665  195,815  151,523  5,333  5,087  4,033 10.74 10.31 10.79 
In offices outside the U.S.(5)In offices outside the U.S.(5) 148,014 159,494 181,151 3,507 3,974 4,829 9.61 9.91 10.72 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                     
Total consumer loansTotal consumer loans $598,027 $593,201 $514,383 $13,084 $13,480 $11,533 8.80%9.02%9.09%Total consumer loans $504,614 $523,927 $566,636 $9,759 $10,800 $12,357 7.84% 8.20% 8.77%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                     
Corporate loansCorporate loans                         Corporate loans 
In U.S. officesIn U.S. offices $43,423 $40,266 $28,685 $648 $680 $503 6.00%6.70%7.11%In U.S. offices $46,868 $48,184 $43,523 $579 $670 $648 5.01% 5.53% 5.99%
In offices outside the U.S.(4)  152,934  159,708  136,103  3,409  3,673  2,906 8.97 9.12 8.66 
In offices outside the U.S.(5)In offices outside the U.S.(5) 120,233 129,269 153,034 2,517 2,983 3,409 8.49 9.18 8.96 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                     
Total corporate loansTotal corporate loans $196,357 $199,974 $164,788 $4,057 $4,353 $3,409 8.31%8.64%8.39%Total corporate loans $167,101 $177,453 $196,557 $3,096 $3,653 $4,057 7.51% 8.19% 8.30%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                     
Total loansTotal loans $794,384 $793,175 $679,171 $17,141 $17,833 $14,942 8.68%8.92%8.92%Total loans $671,715 $701,380 $763,193 $12,855 $14,453 $16,414 7.76% 8.20% 8.65%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                     
Other interest-earning AssetsOther interest-earning Assets $119,148 $114,484 $68,379 $1,334 $1,598 $764 4.50%5.54%4.53%Other interest-earning Assets $53,163 $75,714 $119,148 $300 $517 $1,334 2.29% 2.72% 4.50%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                     
Total interest-earning AssetsTotal interest-earning Assets $1,914,547 $1,981,501 $1,740,663 $29,950 $32,618 $28,174 6.29%6.53%6.56%Total interest-earning Assets $1,586,098 $1,635,854 $1,880,106 $20,609 $23,911 $29,190 5.27% 5.81% 6.24%
          
 
 
 
 
 
               
Non-interest-earning assets(6)  410,972  304,299  204,255                
Non-interest-earning assets(7)Non-interest-earning assets(7) 321,873 406,405 407,606             
Total Assets from discontinued operationsTotal Assets from discontinued operations  $11,415 37,656             
 
 
 
                          
Total assetsTotal assets $2,325,519 $2,285,800 $1,944,918                Total assets $1,907,971 $2,053,674 $2,325,368             
 
 
 
                          

(1)
Interest revenue excludes the taxable equivalent adjustments (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $48$97 million, $31$159 million and $15$48 million for the first quarter of 2008,2009, the fourth quarter of 2007,2008 and the first quarter of 2007,2008, respectively.

(2)
Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities associated with the respective asset and liability categories. See Note 15 on page 91.16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(3)
Monthly or quarterly averages have been used by certain subsidiaries where daily averages are unavailable.

(4)
Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

(5)
Average rates reflect prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary correction in certain countries.

(5)(6)
Average volumes of securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell are reported net pursuant to FIN 41 and Interest revenue excludes the impact of FIN 41.

(6)(7)
The fair value carrying amounts of derivative and foreign exchange contracts are reported in non-interest-earning assets and other non-interest-bearing liabilities.

(7)(8)
Interest expense onTrading account liabilities of Markets & BankingICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported inTrading account assets andTrading account liabilities, respectively.

(8)(9)
Includes cash-basis loans.

Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.


Table of Contents

AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES—LIABILITIES AND EQUITY,
AND NET INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)(4)



 Average Volume
 Interest Expense
 % Average Rate
 
 Average Volume Interest Expense % Average Rate 
In millions of dollars

In millions of dollars

 1st Qtr.
2008

 4th Qtr.
2007

 1st Qtr.
2007

 1st Qtr.
2008

 4th Qtr.
2007

 1st Qtr.
2007

 1st Qtr.
2008

 4th Qtr.
2007

 1st Qtr.
2007

 In millions of dollars 1st Qtr.
2009
 4th Qtr.
2008
 1st Qtr.
2008
 1st Qtr.
2009
 4th Qtr.
2008
 1st Qtr.
2008
 1st Qtr.
2009
 4th Qtr.
2008
 1st Qtr.
2008
 
LiabilitiesLiabilities                         Liabilities 
DepositsDeposits                         Deposits 
In U. S. officesIn U. S. offices                         In U. S. offices 
Savings deposits(4) $164,945 $155,703 $145,259 $1,040 $1,203 $1,170 2.54%3.07%3.27%Savings deposits(5) $164,977 $164,111 $164,945 $334 $587 $1,040 0.82% 1.42% 2.54%
Other time deposits  64,792  70,217  54,946  777  1,012  807 4.82 5.72 5.96 Other time deposits 61,283 58,359 64,792 715 659 777 4.73 4.49 4.82 
In offices outside the U.S.(5)  521,160  532,291  448,074  4,483  5,490  4,581 3.46 4.09 4.15 
In offices outside the U.S.(6)In offices outside the U.S.(6) 408,840 434,845 506,228 1,799 2,834 4,377 1.78 2.59 3.48 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                     
TotalTotal $750,897 $758,211 $648,279 $6,300 $7,705 $6,558 3.37%4.03%4.10%Total $635,100 $657,315 $735,965 $2,848 $4,080 $6,194 1.82% 2.47% 3.38%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                     
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase(6)                         
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase(7)Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase(7) 
In U.S. officesIn U.S. offices $209,878 $233,351 $237,732 $2,035 $3,146 $3,541 3.90%5.35%6.04%In U.S. offices $152,256 $176,526 $209,878 $316 $547 $2,035 0.84% 1.23% 3.90%
In offices outside the U.S.(5)  120,066  132,501  128,641  1,868  2,056  1,942 6.26 6.16 6.12 
In offices outside the U.S.(6)In offices outside the U.S.(6) 71,133 85,673 120,066 803 1,179 1,868 4.58 5.47 6.26 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                     
TotalTotal $329,944 $365,852 $366,373 $3,903 $5,202 $5,483 4.76%5.64%6.07%Total $223,389 $262,199 $329,944 $1,119 $1,726 $3,903 2.03% 2.62% 4.76%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                     
Trading account liabilities(7)(8)                         
Trading account liabilities(8)(9)Trading account liabilities(8)(9) 
In U.S. officesIn U.S. offices $37,713 $37,012 $42,319 $270 $293 $235 2.88%3.14%2.25%In U.S. offices $20,712 $30,206 $37,713 $93 $173 $270 1.82% 2.28% 2.88%
In offices outside the U.S.(5)  53,432  54,831  45,340  63  89  72 0.47 0.64 0.64 
In offices outside the U.S.(6)In offices outside the U.S.(6) 31,965 33,562 53,432 20 25 63 0.25 0.30 0.47 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                     
TotalTotal $91,145 $91,843 $87,659 $333 $382 $307 1.47%1.65%1.42%Total $52,677 $63,768 $91,145 $113 $198 $333 0.87% 1.24% 1.47%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                     
Short-term borrowingsShort-term borrowings                         Short-term borrowings 
In U.S. officesIn U.S. offices $167,619 $176,035 $143,544 $1,152 $1,605 $1,262 2.76%3.62%3.57%In U.S. offices $148,673 $147,386 $167,619 $367 $546 $1,152 1.00% 1.47% 2.76%
In offices outside the U.S.(5)  66,827  71,084  40,835  298  309  202 1.79 1.72 2.01 
In offices outside the U.S.(6)In offices outside the U.S.(6) 41,249 48,834 64,414 130 165 229 1.28 1.34 1.43 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                     
TotalTotal $234,446 $247,119 $184,379 $1,450 $1,914 $1,464 2.49%3.07%3.22%Total $189,922 $196,220 $232,033 $497 $711 $1,381 1.06% 1.44% 2.39%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                     
Long-term debt(9)                         
Long-term debt(10)Long-term debt(10) 
In U.S. officesIn U.S. offices $310,984 $310,132 $252,833 $3,988 $4,212 $3,385 5.16%5.39%5.43%In U.S. offices $309,670 $306,933 $299,347 $2,820 $3,560 $3,831 3.69% 4.61% 5.15%
In offices outside the U.S.(5)  41,866  43,064  27,084  503  578  365 4.83 5.32 5.47 
In offices outside the U.S.(6)In offices outside the U.S.(6) 34,108 34,323 39,790 314 383 480 3.73 4.44 4.85 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                     
TotalTotal $352,850 $353,196 $279,917 $4,491 $4,790 $3,750 5.12%5.38%5.43%Total $343,778 $341,256 $339,137 $3,134 $3,943 $4,311 3.70% 4.60% 5.11%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                     
Total interest-bearing liabilitiesTotal interest-bearing liabilities $1,759,282 $1,816,221 $1,566,607 $16,477 $19,993 $17,562 3.77%4.37%4.55%Total interest-bearing liabilities $1,444,866 $1,520,758 $1,728,224 $7,711 $10,658 $16,122 2.16% 2.79% 3.75%
          
 
 
 
 
 
               
Demand deposits in U.S. officesDemand deposits in U.S. offices  12,960  13,670  11,157                Demand deposits in U.S. offices 15,383 15,162 12,960             
Other non-interest-bearing liabilities(7)  426,171  335,375  247,402                
Other non-interest-bearing liabilities(8)Other non-interest-bearing liabilities(8) 304,425 370,536 438,301             
Total liabilities from discontinued operationsTotal liabilities from discontinued operations  10,122 18,928             
 
 
 
                          
Total liabilitiesTotal liabilities $2,198,413 $2,165,266 $1,825,166                Total liabilities $1,764,674 $1,916,578 $2,198,413             
 
 
 
                          
Total stockholders' equity $127,106 $120,534 $119,752                
Total Citigroup stockholders' equity(11)Total Citigroup stockholders' equity(11) $143,297 $137,096 $126,955             
 
 
 
                          
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $2,325,519 $2,285,800 $1,944,918                
Total liabilities and Citigroup stockholders' equityTotal liabilities and Citigroup stockholders' equity $1,907,971 $2,053,674 $2,325,368             
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                     
Net interest revenue as a percentage of average interest-earning assets(10)                         
Net interest revenue as a percentage of average interest-earning assets(12)Net interest revenue as a percentage of average interest-earning assets(12) 
In U.S. officesIn U.S. offices $1,127,735 $1,103,354 $1,049,574 $6,199 $6,135 $5,159 2.21%2.21%1.99%In U.S. offices $970,429 $944,288 $1,064,593 $6,643 $6,706 $6,132 2.78% 2.83% 2.32%
In offices outside the U.S.(5)  786,812  878,147  691,089  7,274  6,490  5,453 3.72%2.93%3.20%
In offices outside the U.S.(6)In offices outside the U.S.(6) 615,669 691,566 815,513 6,255 6,547 6,936 4.12 3.77 3.42 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                     
TotalTotal $1,914,547 $1,981,501 $1,740,663 $13,473 $12,625 $10,612 2.83%2.53%2.47%Total $1,586,098 $1,635,854 $1,880,106 $12,898 $13,253 $13,068 3.30% 3.22% 2.80%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                     

(1)
Interest revenue excludes the taxable equivalent adjustments (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $48$97 million, $31$159 million and $15$48 million for the first quarter of 2008,2009, the fourth quarter of 2007,2008 and the first quarter of 2007,2008, respectively.

(2)
Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities associated with the respective asset and liability categories. See Note 15 on page 91.16.

(3)
Monthly or quarterly averages have been used by certain subsidiaries where daily averages are unavailable.

(4)
Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

(5)
Savings deposits consist of Insured Money Market Rate accounts, NOW accounts, and other savings deposits.

(5)(6)
Average rates reflect prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.

(6)(7)
Average volumes of securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase are reported net pursuant to FIN 41 and Interest expense excludes the impact of FIN 41.

(7)(8)
The fair value carrying amounts of derivative and foreign exchange contracts are reported in non-interest-earning assets and other non-interest-bearing liabilities.

(8)(9)
Interest expense onTrading account liabilities of Markets & BankingICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported inTrading account assets andTrading account liabilities, respectively.

(9)(10)
Excludes hybrid financial instruments and beneficial interests in consolidated VIEs that are classified as long-termLong-term debt as these obligations are accounted for at fair value with changes recorded inPrincipal Transactions.transactions. In addition, the majority of the funding provided by Treasury to CitiCapital is excluded from this line.

(10)(11)
Includes stockholders' equity from discontinued operations.

(12)
Includes allocations for capital and funding costs based on the location of the asset.

Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.


Table of Contents

ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)


 1st Qtr. 2008 vs. 4th Qtr. 2007
 1st Qtr. 2008 vs. 1st Qtr. 2007
  1st Qtr. 2009 vs. 4th Qtr. 2008 1st Qtr. 2009 vs. 1st Qtr. 2008 

 Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in:

  
 Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in:

  
  Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in:
  
 Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in:
  
 
In millions of dollars
 Average
Volume

 Average Rate
 Net Change
 Average
Volume

 Average Rate
 Net Change
  Average
Volume
 Average Rate Net Change Average
Volume
 Average Rate Net Change 
Deposits with banks(3) $20 $(40)$(20)$270 $(174)$96 

Deposits with banks(4)

 $235 $(562)$(327)$609 $(961)$(352)
 
 
 
 
 
 
              
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell              
In U.S. offices $(149)$(735)$(884)$(101)$(1,032)$(1,133) $(65)$(112)$(177)$(396)$(800)$(1,196)
In offices outside the U.S.(3) (287) 30 (257) (57) 73 16 

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

 (117) (222) (339) (509) (579) (1,088)
 
 
 
 
 
 
              
Total $(436)$(705)$(1,141)$(158)$(959)$(1,117) $(182)$(334)$(516)$(905)$(1,379)$(2,284)
 
 
 
 
 
 
              
Trading account assets(4)             

Trading account assets(5)

 
In U.S. offices $(270)$(58)$(328)$215 $597 $812  $(460)$(264)$(724)$(1,445)$(205)$(1,650)
In offices outside the U.S.(3) (40) 131 91 340 (283) 57 

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

 (105) (105) (210) (481) 290 (191)
 
 
 
 
 
 
              
Total $(310)$73 $(237)$555 $314 $869  $(565)$(369)$(934)$(1,926)$85 $(1,841)
 
 
 
 
 
 
              
Investments(1)              
In U.S. offices $(87)$(122)$(209)$(691)$(161)$(852) $88 $(47)$41 $221 $39 $260 
In offices outside the U.S.(3) (123) 18 (105) (81) 92 11 

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

 254 (5) 249 111 118 229 
 
 
 
 
 
 
              
Total $(210)$(104)$(314)$(772)$(69)$(841) $342 $(52)$290 $332 $157 $489 
 
 
 
 
 
 
              
Loans—consumer              
In U.S. offices $21 $(663)$(642)$707 $(456)$251  $(144)$(430)$(574)$(540)$(736)$(1,276)
In offices outside the U.S.(3) 101 145 246 1,286 14 1,300 

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

 (278) (189) (467) (822) (500) (1,322)
 
 
 
 
 
 
              
Total $122 $(518)$(396)$1,993 $(442)$1,551  $(422)$(619)$(1,041)$(1,362)$(1,236)$(2,598)
 
 
 
 
 
 
              
Loans—corporate              
In U.S. offices $51 $(83)$(32)$229 $(84)$145  $(18)$(73)$(91)$47 $(116)$(69)
In offices outside the U.S.(3) (153) (111) (264) 371 132 503 

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

 (200) (266) (466) (696) (196) (892)
 
 
 
 
 
 
              
Total $(102)$(194)$(296)$600 $48 $648  $(218)$(339)$(557)$(649)$(312)$(961)
 
 
 
 
 
 
              
Total loans $20 $(712)$(692)$2,593 $(394)$2,199  $(640)$(958)$(1,598)$(2,011)$(1,548)$(3,559)
 
 
 
 
 
 
              
Other interest-earning assets $63 $(327)$(264)$568 $2 $570  $(137)$(80)$(217)$(546)$(488)$(1,034)
 
 
 
 
 
 
              
Total interest revenue $(853)$(1,815)$(2,668)$3,056 $(1,280)$1,776  $(947)$(2,355)$(3,302)$(4,447)$(4,134)$(8,581)
 
 
 
 
 
 
              

(1)
The taxable equivalent adjustment is based on the U.S. Federalfederal statutory tax rate of 35%, and is excluded from this presentation.

(2)
Rate/volume variance is allocated based on the percentage relationship of changes in volume and changes in rate to the total net change.

(3)
Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

(4)
Changes in average rates reflect changes in prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.

(4)(5)
Interest expense onTrading account liabilities of Markets & BankingICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported inTrading account assets andTrading account liabilities, respectively.

Table of Contents

ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN INTEREST EXPENSE AND NET INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)


 1st Qtr. 2008 vs. 4th Qtr. 2007
 1st Qtr. 2008 vs. 1st Qtr. 2007
  1st Qtr. 2009 vs. 4th Qtr. 2008 1st Qtr. 2009 vs. 1st Qtr. 2008 

 Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in:

  
 Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in:

  
  Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in:
  
 Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in:
  
 
In millions of dollars
 Average
Volume

 Average Rate
 Net Change
 Average
Volume

 Average Rate
 Net Change
  Average
Volume
 Average Rate Net Change Average
Volume
 Average Rate Net Change 
Deposits              
In U.S. offices $37 $(435)$(398)$267 $(427)$(160) $21 $(218)$(197)$(27)$(741)$(768)
In offices outside the U.S.(3) (113) (894) (1,007) 687 (785) (98)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

 (161) (874) (1,035) (726) (1,852) (2,578)
 
 
 
 
 
 
              
Total $(76)$(1,329)$(1,405)$954 $(1,212)$(258) $(140)$(1,092)$(1,232)$(753)$(2,593)$(3,346)
 
 
 
 
 
 
              
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase              
In U.S. offices $(293)$(818)$(1,111)$(378)$(1,128)$(1,506) $(68)$(163)$(231)$(445)$(1,274)$(1,719)
In offices outside the U.S.(3) (193) 5 (188) (132) 58 (74)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

 (183) (193) (376) (636) (429) (1,065)
 
 
 
 
 
 
              
Total $(486)$(813)$(1,299)$(510)$(1,070)$(1,580) $(251)$(356)$(607)$(1,081)$(1,703)$(2,784)
 
 
 
 
 
 
              
Trading account liabilities(4)             

Trading account liabilities(5)

 
In U.S. offices $5 $(28)$(23)$(28)$63 $35  $(47)$(33)$(80)$(97)$(80)$(177)
In offices outside the U.S.(3) (2) (24) (26) 11 (20) (9)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

 (1) (4) (5) (20) (23) (43)
 
 
 
 
 
 
              
Total $3 $(52)$(49)$(17)$43 $26  $(48)$(37)$(85)$(117)$(103)$(220)
 
 
 
 
 
 
              
Short-term borrowings              
In U.S. offices $(74)$(379)$(453)$192 $(302)$(110) $5 $(184)$(179)$(118)$(667)$(785)
In offices outside the U.S.(3) (19) 8 (11) 118 (22) 96 

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

 (24) (11) (35) (75) (24) (99)
 
 
 
 
 
 
              
Total $(93)$(371)$(464)$310 $(324)$(14) $(19)$(195)$(214)$(193)$(691)$(884)
 
 
 
 
 
 
              
Long-term debt              
In U.S. offices $12 $(236)$(224)$751 $(148)$603  $31 $(771)$(740)$128 $(1,139)$(1,011)
In offices outside the U.S.(3) (16) (59) (75) 181 (43) 138 

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

 (2) (67) (69) (62) (104) (166)
 
 
 
 
 
 
              
Total $(4)$(295)$(299)$932 $(191)$741  $29 $(838)$(809)$66 $(1,243)$(1,177)
 
 
 
 
 
 
              
Total interest expense $(656)$(2,860)$(3,516)$1,669 $(2,754)$(1,085) $(429)$(2,518)$(2,947)$(2,078)$(6,333)$(8,411)
 
 
 
 
 
 
              
Net interest revenue $(197)$1,045 $848 $1,387 $1,474 $2,861  $(518)$163 $(355)$(2,369)$2,199 $(170)
 
 
 
 
 
 
              

(1)
The taxable equivalent adjustment is based on the U.S. Federalfederal statutory tax rate of 35%, and is excluded from this presentation.

(2)
Rate/volume variance is allocated based on the percentage relationship of changes in volume and changes in rate to the total net change.

(3)
Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

(4)
Changes in average rates reflect changes in prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.

(4)(5)
Interest expense onTrading account liabilities of Markets & BankingICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported inTrading account assets andTrading account liabilities, respectively.

Table of Contents


CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY

CAPITAL RESOURCES

Overview

        Capital is generally generated by earnings from operating businesses. This is augmented through issuances of common stock, convertible preferred stock, preferred stock, subordinated debt underlying trust preferred securities, and equity issued through awards under employee benefit plans. Capital is used primarily to support assets in the Company's businesses and to absorb expected and unexpected market, credit or operational losses. The Company's uses of capital, particularly to pay dividends and repurchase common stock, became severely restricted during the latter half of 2008 as explained more fully in the 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K. See also "Events in 2009" and "TARP and Other Regulatory Programs" and "Common Equity."

        Citigroup's capital management framework is designed to ensure that Citigroup and its principal subsidiaries maintain sufficient capital consistent with the Company's risk profile, all applicable regulatory standards and guidelines, and external rating agency considerations. The capital management process is centrally overseen by senior management and is reviewed at the consolidated, legal entity and country level.

        Senior management oversees the capital management process of Citigroup and its principal subsidiaries mainly through Citigroup's Finance and Asset and Liability Committee (FinALCO). The Committee is composed of the senior-most management of Citigroup for the purpose of engaging management in decision-making and related discussions on capital and liquidity matters. Among other things, the Committee's responsibilities include: determining the financial structure of Citigroup and its principal subsidiaries; ensuring that Citigroup and its regulated entities are adequately capitalized; determining appropriate asset levels and return hurdles for Citigroup and individual businesses; reviewing the funding and capital markets plan for Citigroup; and monitoring interest-rate risk, corporate and bank liquidity and the impact of currency translation on non-U.S. earnings and capital. The FinALCO has established capital targets for Citigroup and for significant subsidiaries. At March 31, 2009, these targets exceeded the regulatory standards.

Impact of Recent U.S. Government Agreements

        During the first quarter of 2009, Citigroup issued $7.059 billion of preferred stock to the U.S. Treasury and the FDIC, and a warrant to purchase common stock to the U.S. Treasury, as consideration for the loss-sharing agreement with the USG. See "TARP and Other Regulatory Programs." Citigroup received no additional cash proceeds for their issuance. Of the issuance, $3.617 billion, representing the fair value of the issued shares and warrant, was treated as Tier 1 Capital, adding approximately 35 basis points to the Tier 1 Capital ratio during the first quarter.

        In addition, on February 27, 2009, the Company announced an exchange offer of its common stock for up to a total of $27.5 billion of its existing preferred stock and trust preferred securities. On May 7, 2009, as a result of the USG's Supervisory Capital Assessment Program (SCAP), the Company announced that it will expand the Exchange Offer by increasing the maximum amount of preferred securities and trust preferred securities that it will accept in the Exchange Offer by $5.5 billion to a total of $33 billion. The USG will match the exchange by converting up to a maximum of $25 billion of its preferred stock into common stock. This transaction could increase Tier 1 Common of the Company from the first quarter of 2009 level of $22.1 billion to as much as $86.2 billion, which assumes the exchange of $33 billion of preferred securities and trust preferred securities, the maximum eligible under the transaction. Citi's tangible common equity (TCE), which was $30.9 billion as of March 31, 2009, will increase by as much as $60.4 billion to up to $91.3 billion.There will be no impact to Tier 1 Capital resulting from the exchange offer.

        These first quarter 2009 transactions built upon actions taken by the Company, in conjunction with the USG, during the latter part of 2008 to increase its capital, including without limitation the issuance of an aggregate of $45 billion in preferred stock and warrants to the USG under TARP, all of which was treated as Tier 1 Capital for regulatory capital purposes. See "Events in 2009" and "TARP and Other Regulatory Programs." As a result of these and other issuances of preferred stock, the conversion price of the Company's preferred stock issued in a private offering in January 2008 was reset, resulting in a reclassification fromRetained earnings toAdditional paid in capital of approximately $1.285 billion. See "Events in 2009—Exchange Offer and Conversions."

        Future business results of the Company, including events such as corporate dispositions, will continue to affect the Company's capital levels. Moreover, changes that the FASB has proposed regarding off-balance sheet assets, consolidation and sale treatment could also have an incremental impact on capital ratios. See also Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, including "Funding, Liquidity Facilities and Subordinate Interests."


Table of Contents

Capital Ratios

        Citigroup is subject to risk-based capital ratio guidelines issued by the FRB.Federal Reserve Board (FRB). Capital adequacy is measured, viain part, based on two risk-based capital ratios, the Tier 1 and Total Capital (Tier 1 + Tier 2 Capital). ratios. Tier 1 Capital is consideredconsists of core capital, while Total Capital also includes other items such as subordinated debt and loan loss reserves. Both measures of capital adequacy are stated as a percentpercentage of risk-adjustedrisk-weighted assets. Risk-adjusted

        Citigroup's risk-weighted assets are measured primarily on their perceivedprincipally derived from application of the risk-based capital guidelines related to the measurement of credit risk, under which on-balance sheet assets and includethe credit equivalent amount of certain off-balance-sheetoff-balance sheet exposures such(such as financial guarantees, unfunded loanlending commitments, and letters of credit, and derivatives) are assigned to one of several prescribed risk weight categories based upon the notional amountsperceived credit risk associated with the obligor, or if relevant, the guarantor, the nature of derivativethe collateral, or external credit ratings. Risk-weighted assets also incorporate a measure for market risk on covered trading account positions, and all foreign exchange contracts.and commodity positions whether or not carried in the trading account. Excluded from risk-weighted assets are any assets, such as goodwill and deferred tax assets, to the extent required to be deducted from regulatory capital.

        Citigroup is also subject to thea Leverage Ratio requirement, a non-risk-based asset ratio,measure of capital adequacy, which is defined as Tier 1 Capital as a percentage of quarterly adjusted average assets.

        To be "well capitalized" under federal bank regulatory agency definitions, a bank holding company must have a Tier 1 Capital Ratio of at least 6%, a Total Capital Ratio of at least 10%, and a Leverage Ratio of at least 3%, and not be subject to an FRB directive to maintain higher capital levels.

        In conjunction with the conclusion of the SCAP, the Banking Regulators have developed a new measure of capital called Tier 1 Common defined as Tier 1 Capital less non-common elements including qualified perpetual preferred stock, qualifying minority interest in subsidiaries and qualifying trust preferred securities.

As noted in the following table, Citigroup maintained awas "well capitalized" positionunder federal bank regulatory agency definitions at March 31, 20082009 and December 31, 2007.2008.

Citigroup Regulatory Capital Ratios(1)Ratios


 March 31,
2008(2)

 December 31,
2007(2)

 

 Mar. 31,
2009
 Dec. 31,
2008
 

Tier 1 Common

 2.16% 2.30%
Tier 1 Capital 7.74%7.12% 11.92 11.92 
Total Capital (Tier 1 and Tier 2) 11.22 10.70  15.61 15.70 
Leverage(3) 4.39 4.03 

Leverage(1)

 6.60 6.08 
     

(1)
The FRB granted industry-wide interim capital relief for the impact of adopting SFAS 158.

(2)
The impact of including Citigroup's own credit rating in valuing liabilities for which the fair value option has been selected is excluded from Tier 1 Capital at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.

(3)
Tier 1 Capital divided by each period's quarterly adjusted average assetsassets.

Table of Contents

Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines

In millions of dollars

In millions of dollars

 Mar. 31,
2008

 Dec. 31,(1)
2007

 In millions of dollars Mar. 31,
2009
 Dec. 31,
2008(1)
 
Tier 1 Capital     
Common stockholders' equity $108,835 $113,598 
Qualifying perpetual preferred stock 19,384  
Qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts 23,959 23,594 
Minority interest 1,506 4,077 
Less: Net unrealized gains/(losses) on securities available-for-sale(2) (1,916) 471 
Tier 1 CommonTier 1 Common 
Citigroup common stockholders' equityCitigroup common stockholders' equity $69,688 $70,966 
Less: Net unrealized gains (losses) on securities available-for-sale, net of tax(2)Less: Net unrealized gains (losses) on securities available-for-sale, net of tax(2) (10,040) (9,647)
Less: Accumulated net losses on cash flow hedges, net of taxLess: Accumulated net losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax (4,801) (3,163)Less: Accumulated net losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax (3,706) (5,189)
Less: Pension liability adjustment, net of tax(3)Less: Pension liability adjustment, net of tax(3) (1,026) (1,057)Less: Pension liability adjustment, net of tax(3) (2,549) (2,615)
Less: Cumulative effect included in fair value of financial liabilities attributable to credit worthiness, net of tax(4)Less: Cumulative effect included in fair value of financial liabilities attributable to credit worthiness, net of tax(4) 1,409 1,352 Less: Cumulative effect included in fair value of financial liabilities attributable to credit worthiness, net of tax(4) 3,487 3,391 
Less: Restricted Core Capital Elements(5)  1,364 
Less: Disallowed Deferred Tax Assets(6) 3,715  
Less: Disallowed deferred tax assets(5)Less: Disallowed deferred tax assets(5) 22,920 23,520 
Less: Intangible assets:Less: Intangible assets:     Less: Intangible assets: 
Goodwill 43,622 41,204 Goodwill 26,410 27,132 
Other disallowed intangible assets 12,262 10,511 Other disallowed intangible assets 10,205 10,607 
OtherOther (1,331) (1,361)Other (870) (840)
 
 
       
Total Tier 1 CommonTotal Tier 1 Common $22,091 $22,927 
     
Qualifying perpetual preferred stockQualifying perpetual preferred stock $74,246 $70,664 
Qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trustsQualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts 24,532 23,899 
Minority interestMinority interest 1,056 1,268 
     
Total Tier 1 CapitalTotal Tier 1 Capital $99,088 $89,226 Total Tier 1 Capital $121,925 $118,758 
 
 
       
Tier 2 CapitalTier 2 Capital     Tier 2 Capital 
Allowance for credit losses(7) $16,102 $15,778 
Qualifying debt(8) 27,332 26,690 
Allowance for credit losses(6)Allowance for credit losses(6) $13,200 $12,806 
Qualifying debt(7)Qualifying debt(7) 24,379 24,791 
Unrealized marketable equity securities gains(2)Unrealized marketable equity securities gains(2) 1,086 1,063 Unrealized marketable equity securities gains(2) 157 43 
Restricted Core Capital Elements(5)  1,364 
 
 
       
Total Tier 2 CapitalTotal Tier 2 Capital $44,520 $44,895 Total Tier 2 Capital $37,736 $37,640 
 
 
       
Total Capital (Tier 1 and Tier 2)Total Capital (Tier 1 and Tier 2) $143,608 $134,121 Total Capital (Tier 1 and Tier 2) $159,661 $156,398 
 
 
       
Risk-Adjusted Assets(9) $1,279,586 $1,253,321 
Risk-Weighted Assets(8)Risk-Weighted Assets(8) $1,023,038 $996,247 
 
 
       

(1)
Reclassified to conform to the current period'speriod presentation.

(2)
Tier 1 Capital excludes net unrealized gains and losses(losses) on available-for-sale debt securities and net unrealized gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair values, in accordance with regulatory risk-based capital guidelines. InstitutionsIn arriving at Tier 1 Capital, institutions are required to deduct from Tier 1 Capital net unrealized holding gainslosses on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair values, net of tax. The federal bank regulatory agencies permit institutionsInstitutions are permitted to include in Tier 2 Capital up to 45% of pretax net unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair values, net of tax.values.

(3)
The FRB granted industry-wide interim capital relief for the impact of adopting SFAS 158.

(4)
The impact of including Citigroup's own credit rating in valuing liabilities for which the fair value option has been selectedelected is excluded from Tier 1 Capital, at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.in accordance with regulatory risk-based capital guidelines.

(5)
RepresentsOf the excessCompany's approximately $43 billion of allowable restricted core capital in Tier 1 Capital. Restricted core capital is limited to 25% of all core capital elements, net of goodwill.

(6)
Represents net deferred tax assets that did not qualify for inclusionat March 31, 2009, approximately $15 billion of such assets were includable without limitation in regulatory capital pursuant to the risk-based capital guidelines, while approximately $23 billion of such assets exceeded the limitation imposed by these guidelines and, as "disallowed deferred tax assets," were deducted in arriving at Tier 1 capital basedCapital. The Company's other approximately $5 billion of net deferred tax assets at March 31, 2009 primarily represented the deferred tax effects of unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt securities, which are permitted to be excluded prior to deriving the capital guidelinesamount of net deferred tax assets subject to limitation under the guidelines. The Company had approximately $24 billion of disallowed deferred tax assets at MarchDecember 31, 2008.

(7)(6)
Can includeIncludable up to 1.25% of risk-adjustedrisk-weighted assets. Any excess allowance is deducted from risk-adjustedrisk-weighted assets.

(8)(7)
Includes qualifying subordinated debt in an amount not exceeding 50% of Tier 1 Capital.

(9)(8)
Includes risk-weighted credit equivalent amounts, net of applicable bilateral netting agreements, of $115.1$91.9 billion for interest rate, commodity and equity derivative contracts, and foreign-exchange contracts and credit derivatives as of March 31, 2008,2009, compared with $91.3$102.9 billion as of December 31, 2007.2008. Market-risk-equivalent assets included in risk-adjustedrisk-weighted assets amounted to $115.6$96.2 billion at March 31, 20082009 and $109.0$101.8 billion at December 31, 2007, respectively. Risk-adjusted2008. Risk-weighted assets also include the effect of certain other off-balance-sheetoff-balance sheet exposures, such as unused loanlending commitments and letters of credit, and reflect deductions for certain intangible assets and any excess allowance for credit losses.

        Common stockholders' equityAll three of Citigroup's primary credit card securitization trusts—Master Trust, Omni Trust, and Broadway Trust—have had bonds placed on ratings watch by rating agencies. The Master Trust and Broadway Trust had bonds placed on ratings watch with negative implications during the first quarter of 2009. As a result of the ratings watch status, certain actions were taken or announced with respect to the Master Trust. The actions subordinated certain senior interests in the trust assets that were retained by Citigroup, which effectively placed these interests below investor interests in terms of priority of payment. While the Omni Trust bonds had not been placed on ratings watch status until April 2009, the Omni Trust had nonetheless previously issued a subordinated note with a face amount of $265 million in October 2008 to Citibank (South Dakota) N.A., in order to avert a downgrade of its outstanding AAA and A securities. The Federal Reserve has concluded that as a result of these actions commencing with the first quarter of 2009, Citigroup is also required to include the sold assets of the Master and Omni trusts in its risk-weighted assets for purposes of calculating its risk-based capital ratios. The effect of this decision increased Citigroup's risk-weighted assets by approximately $82 billion at March 31, 2009, and decreased Citigroup's Tier 1 Capital ratio by approximately $4.8 billion to $108.8 billion, representing 4.9% of total assets100 bps, as of March 31, 2008 from $113.6 billion and 5.2% at December 31, 2007.

        During2009. See Note 15 to the first quarter of 2008, the Company completed or announced the following preferred stock issuances:

        Subsequent to March 31, 2008, the Company issued $6 billion of Series E 8.40% fixed rate/floating rate non-cumulative preferred stock, which settled on April 28, 2008. The Series E preferred stock will pay, when and if declared by the Company's Board of Directors, dividends in cash at a rate of 8.40% per annum, payable semi-annually until April 2018, and quarterly thereafter at a floating rate. The first dividend payment date will be October 30, 2008. The Series E preferred stock is perpetual and has no maturity date.

        We raised an additional $6.0 billion of capital through a preferred stock issuance on April 28, 2008 and sold approximately $4.9 billion of common stock (scheduled to close on May 5, 2008), which includes the over-allotment option that was exercised on May 1, 2008 (194,327,721 total shares that were priced at $25.27 per share on April 30, 2008). On a pro forma basis, taking into account the issuances of this preferred and common stock, the Company's March 31, 2008 Tier 1 Capital ratio would have been approximately 8.7%.Consolidated Financial Statements.


Table of Contents

Common Equity

        Citigroup's common stockholders' equity decreased approximately $1.3 billion to $69.7 billion, and represents 3.8% of total assets as of March 31, 2009, from $71.0 billion and 3.7% at December 31, 2008.

        The table below summarizes the change in Citigroup's common stockholders' equity:equity during the first three months of 2009:

In billions of dollars

  
   
 
Common Equity, December 31, 2007 $113.6 
Common equity, December 31, 2008 $71.0 
Net income (5.1) 1.6 
Employee benefit plans and other activities 0.4 
Dividends (1.8) (1.1)
Issuance of shares for Nikko Cordial acquisition 4.4 
Net change in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax (2.7) (1.8)
 
    
Common Equity, March 31, 2008 $108.8 
Common equity, March 31, 2009 $69.7 
 
    

        As of March 31, 2008,2009, $6.7 billion of stock repurchases remained under authorized repurchase programs after no material repurchases were made in 2008. Under TARP, the repurchase of $0.7 billion in shares during 2007. As a result of developmentsCompany is restricted from repurchasing common stock, subject to certain exceptions, including in the latter halfordinary course of 2007business as part of employee benefit programs. In addition, in accordance with various TARP programs, Citigroup has agreed not to pay a quarterly common stock dividend exceeding $0.01 per share per quarter for three years (beginning in 2009) without the consent of the U.S. Treasury. Further, as previously announced, in connection with the proposed exchange offer, Citi suspended dividends on its common stock. See "Events in 2009—Exchange Offer and early 2008, including CDO write-downs and recent acquisitions,Conversions."

Tangible Common Equity (TCE)

        Citigroup management believes TCE is useful because it is anticipated thata measure utilized by market analysts in evaluating a company's financial condition and capital strength. Tangible common equity (TCE), as defined by the Company, will not resume its share repurchase programrepresentsCommon equity lessGoodwill andIntangible assets (excluding MSRs) net of therelated deferred tax liabilities. TCE was $30.9 billion at March 31, 2009 and $31.1 at December 31, 2008.

        The TCE Ratio (TCE divided by risk-weighted assets (see above under "Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines"), was 3.0% at March 31, 2009, and 3.1% at December 31, 2008, respectively.

        TCE and the TCE Ratio are non-GAAP financial measures. Other companies may calculate TCE in a manner different from Citigroup. A reconciliation of Citigroup's total stockholders' equity to TCE follows:

In millions of dollars, except ratio March 31,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 
Total Citigroup Stockholders' Equity $143,934 $141,630 
Preferred Stock  (74,246) (70,664)
      
Common Equity $69,688 $70,966 
 Goodwill  (26,410) (27,132)
 Intangible Assets (excluding MSRs)  (13,612) 1,254 
 Related net deferred tax liabilities  (14,159) 1,382 
      
Tangible Common Equity (TCE) $30,920 $31,057 
      
Tangible Assets       
GAAP assets $1,822,578 $1,938,470 
 Goodwill  (26,410) (27,132)
 Intangible Assets (excluding MSRs)  (13,612) (14,159)
 Related deferred tax assets  (1,275) (1,285)
      
Tangible Assets (TA)(1) $1,781,281 $1,895,894 
      
Risk-Weighted Assets (RWA) $1,023,038 $996,247 
      
TCE/TA RATIO  1.7% 1.6%
      
TCE RATIO (TCE/RWA)  3.0% 3.1%
      

(1)
GAAP Assets less Goodwill and Intangible Assets excluding MSRs, and the near future.related deferred tax assets.

Table of Contents

Capital Resources of Citigroup's Depository Institutions

        Citigroup's subsidiary depository institutions in the United States are subject to risk-based capital guidelines issued by their respective primary federal bank regulatory agencies, which are similar to the FRB's guidelines. To be "well capitalized" under federal bank regulatory agency definitions, Citigroup's depository institutions must have a Tier 1 Capital Ratio of at least 6%, a Total Capital (Tier 1 + Tier 2 Capital) Ratio of at least 10% and a Leverage Ratio of at least 5%, and not be subject to a regulatory directive to meet and maintain higher capital levels.

        At March 31, 2008,2009, all of Citigroup's subsidiary depository institutions were "well capitalized" under the federal regulatory agencies' definitions, including Citigroup's primary depository institution, Citibank, N.A., as noted in the following table:

Citibank, N.A. Components of Capital and Ratios Under Regulatory Capital Ratios(1)Guidelines


 March 31,
2008(2)(3)

 December 31,
2007(2)

 
In billions of dollars Mar. 31,
2009
 Dec. 31,
2008
 
Tier 1 Capital 8.59%8.98% $98.7 $71.0 
Total Capital (Tier 1 and Tier 2) 12.88 13.33  122.5 108.4 
Leverage(4) 6.09 6.65 
     
Tier 1 Capital Ratio 14.64% 9.94%
Total Capital Ratio (Tier 1 and Tier 2) 18.19 15.18 
Leverage Ratio(1) 8.38 5.82 
     

(1)
The U.S. Banking Agencies granted industry-wide interim capital relief for the impact of adopting SFAS 158.

(2)
The impact of including Citigroup's own credit rating in valuing liabilities for which the fair value option has been selected is excluded from Tier 1 Capital at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.

(3)
Net deferred tax assets that did not qualify for inclusion in Tier 1 Capital based on the capital guidelines was $1.2 billion at March 31, 2008.

(4)
Tier 1 Capital divided by each period's quarterly adjusted average assets.

Citibank, N.A. Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines(1)

In billions of dollars

 March 31,
2008(2)(3)

 December 31,
2007(2)

Tier 1 Capital $80.9 $82.0
Total Capital (Tier 1 and Tier 2)  121.2  121.6

(1)
The U.S. Banking Agencies granted industry-wide interim capital relief for the impact of adopting SFAS 158.

(2)
The impact of including Citigroup's own credit rating in valuing liabilities for which the fair value option has been selected is excluded from Tier 1 Capital at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.

(3)
Net deferred tax assets that did not qualify for inclusion in Tier 1 Capital based on the capital guidelines were $1.2 billion at March 31, 2008.

        Citibank, N.A. had a net lossincome of $0.9$1.5 billion for the first quarter of 2008.2009.

        Citibank, N.A. did not issue any additional subordinated notes duringDuring the first quarter of 2008. For the full year 2007,2009, Citibank, N.A. issued an additional $5.2received capital contributions from its parent company of $27.5 billion. Citibank, N.A. redeemed $13.2 billion of subordinated notes to Citicorp Holdings Inc. that qualify for inclusion in Citibank, N.A.'s Tier 2 Capital.the first quarter of 2009. Total subordinated notes issued to Citicorp Holdings Inc. that were outstanding at March 31, 20082009 and December 31, 2007,2008 and included in Citibank, N.A.'s Tier 2 Capital, amounted to $15.0 billion and $28.2 billion.billion, respectively. The significant events in 2008 and the first quarter of 2009 impacting the capital of Citigroup, and the potential future events discussed under "Capital Resources and Liquidity," also affected, or could affect, Citibank, N.A.


Table of Contents

        The following table presents the estimated sensitivity of Citigroup's and Citibank, N.A.'s Capital Ratios to changes of $100 million of Tier 1 or Total Capital (numerator), or changes of $1 billion in risk-adjustedrisk-weighted assets or adjusted average assets (denominator). based on financial information as of March 31, 2009. This information is provided solely for the purpose of analyzing the impact that a change in the Company's financial position or results of operations hascould have on these ratios. These sensitivities only consider a single change to either a component of Capital, risk-adjustedrisk-weighted assets or adjusted average assets. Accordingly, an event that affects more than one factor may have a larger basis pointbasis-point impact than what is reflected in this table.

 
 Tier 1 Capital Ratio
 Total Capital Ratio
 Leverage Ratio
 
 Impact of $100
million change
in Tier 1 Capital

 Impact of $1
billion change
in risk-adjustedrisk-weighted
assets

 Impact of $100
million change
in Total Capitaltotal capital

 Impact of $1
billion change
in risk-adjustedrisk-weighted
assets

 Impact of $100
million change
in Tier 1 Capital

 Impact of $1
billion change
in adjusted
average assets

Citigroup1.0 bps1.2 bps1.0 bps1.5 bps0.5 bps0.4 bps
Citibank, N.A. 1.5 bps2.2 bps1.5 bps2.7 bps 0.8 bps 0.60.7 bps 
0.8 bps 0.9 bps 0.4 bps 0.2 bps
Citibank, N.A.  1.1 bps 0.9 bps 1.1 bps 1.4 bps0.8 bps0.5 bps

Broker-Dealer Subsidiaries

        At March 31, 2008,2009, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., an indirect wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiary of Citigroup Global MarketMarkets Holdings Inc. (CGMHI), had net capital, computed in accordance with the Net Capital Rule, of $4.0$8.5 billion, which exceeded the minimum requirement by $3.1$7.7 billion.

        In addition, certain of the Company's broker-dealer subsidiaries are subject to regulation in the other countries in which they do business, including requirements to maintain specified levels of net capital or its equivalent. The Company's broker-dealer subsidiaries were in compliance with their capital requirements at March 31, 2008.2009.

Regulatory Capital Standards Developments

        Citigroup supports the move to a new set of risk-based regulatory capital standards, published on June 26, 2004 (and subsequently amended in November 2005) by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, consisting of central banks and bank supervisors from 13 countries. The international version of the Basel II framework will allow Citigroup to leverage internal risk models used to measure credit, operational, and market risk exposures to drive regulatory capital calculations.

        On December 7, 2007, the U.S. banking regulators published the rules for large banks to comply with Basel II in the U.S. These rules require Citigroup, as a large and internationally active bank, to comply with the most advanced Basel II approaches for calculating credit and operational risk capital requirements. The U.S. implementation timetable consists of a parallel calculation period under the current regulatory capital regime (Basel I) and Basel II, starting any timeanytime between April 1, 2008, and April 1, 2010 followed by a three-year transition period, typically starting 12 months after the beginning of parallel reporting. The U.S. regulators have reserved the right to change how Basel II is applied in the U.S. following a review at the end of the second year of the transitional period, and to retain the existing prompt corrective action and leverage capital requirements applicable to banking organizations in the U.S.

        The Company is currently reviewing its timetable for adoption.intends to implement Basel II within the timeframe required by the final rules.


Table of Contents

FUNDING

Overview

        AsBecause Citigroup is a financialbank holding company, substantially all of Citigroup'sits net earnings are generated within its operating subsidiaries. These subsidiaries make funds available to Citigroup, primarily in the form of dividends. Certain subsidiaries' dividend payingdividend-paying abilities may be limited by covenant restrictions in credit agreements, regulatory requirements and/or rating agencyrating-agency requirements that also impact their capitalization levels.

        DuringAs discussed in more detail in the second halfCompany's 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K, global financial markets faced unprecedented disruption in the latter part of 2008. Citigroup and other U.S. financial services firms are currently benefiting from numerous government programs that are improving markets and providing Citigroup and other institutions with significant current funding capacity and significant liquidity support. See "TARP and Other Regulatory Programs."

        In addition to the above programs, since the middle of 2007, and the first quarter of 2008 the Company tookhas taken a series of actions to reduce potential funding risks related to short-term market dislocations. The amount of commercial paper outstanding was reduced and the weighted-average maturity was extended, the Parent Companyparent company liquidity portfolio (a portfolio of cash and highly liquid securities) and broker-dealer "cash box" (unencumbered cash deposits) were increased substantially, and the amount of unsecured overnight bank borrowings was reduced. For each of the past eleven months in the period ending March 31, 2009, the Company was, on average, a net lender of funds in the interbank market or had excess cash placed in its account at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. As of March 31, 2008,2009, the Parent Companyparent company liquidity portfolio and broker-dealer "cash box" totaled $30.0$65.1 billion as compared with $24.2$66.8 billion at December 31, 20072008 and $11.4$30.0 billion at June 30, 2007. AsMarch 31, 2008.

        These actions to reduce funding risks, the reduction of the balance sheet and the substantial support provided by U.S. government programs have allowed the combined parent and broker-dealer entities to maintain sufficient liquidity to meet all maturing unsecured debt obligations due within a resultone-year time horizon, without accessing the unsecured markets.

        Citigroup's funding sources are diversified across funding types and geography, a benefit of recent fundingits global franchise. Funding for Citigroup and capital actions, this balance totaled $54.8 billion at April 30, 2008.its major operating subsidiaries includes a geographically diverse retail and corporate deposit base of $762.7 billion. These deposits are diversified across products and regions, with approximately two-thirds of them outside of the U.S. This diversification provides the Company with an important, stable and low-cost source of funding. A significant portion of these deposits has been, and is expected to be, long-term and stable, and are considered to be core.

        Excluding the impact of changes in foreign exchange rates during the quarter ended March 31, 2009, the Company's deposit base remained stable. On a volume basis, deposit increases were noted in U.S. and International Retail Banking, and in Smith Barney. This was partially offset by declines in Corporate balances and the Private Bank.

Banking Subsidiaries

        There are various legal limitations on the ability of Citigroup's subsidiary depository institutions to extend credit, pay dividends or otherwise supply funds to Citigroup and its nonbanknon-bank subsidiaries. The approval of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, in the case of national banks, or the Office of Thrift Supervision, in the case of federal savings banks, is required if total dividends declared in any calendar year exceed amounts specified by the applicable agency's regulations. State-chartered depository institutions are subject to dividend limitations imposed by applicable state law.

        As of March 31, 2008, Citigroup's subsidiary depository institutions could declare dividends to their parent companies, without regulatory approval, of approximately $8.3 billion. In determining the declaration of dividends, each depository institution must also consider its effect on applicable risk-based capital and leverage ratio requirements, as well as policy statements of the federal regulatory agencies that indicate that banking organizations should generally pay dividends out of current operating earnings. Consistent with these rules and other considerations, Citigroup estimates that, as of March 31, 2008,2009, its subsidiary depository institutions couldwould distribute dividends to Citigroup of approximately $205 million.


Table of Contents

Non-Banking Subsidiaries

        Citigroup also receives dividends from its non-bank subsidiaries. These non-bank subsidiaries are generally not subject to regulatory restrictions on dividends. However, the entire $8.3 billion.ability of CGMHI to declare dividends can be restricted by capital considerations of its broker-dealer subsidiaries.

        CGMHI's consolidated balance sheet is liquid, with the vast majority of its assets consisting of marketable securities and collateralized short-term financing agreements arising from securities transactions. CGMHI monitors and evaluates the adequacy of its capital and borrowing base on a daily basis to maintain liquidity and to ensure that its capital base supports the regulatory capital requirements of its subsidiaries.

        Some of Citigroup's non-bank subsidiaries, including CGMHI, have credit facilities with Citigroup's subsidiary depository institutions, including Citibank, N.A. Borrowings under these facilities must be secured in accordance with Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act. There are various legal restrictions on the extent to which a bank holding company and certain of its non-bank subsidiaries can borrow or obtain credit from Citigroup's subsidiary depository institutions or engage in certain other transactions with them. In general, these restrictions require that transactions be on arm's length terms and be secured by designated amounts of specified collateral. See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

        At March 31, 2008,2009, long-term debt and commercial paper outstanding for Citigroup, Parent Company, CGMHI, Citigroup Funding Inc. (CFI) and Citigroup's Subsidiariessubsidiaries were as follows:

In billions of dollars

 Citigroup
Parent
company

 CGMHI(1)
 Citigroup
Funding
Inc.(1)

 Other
Citigroup
Subsidiaries(2)

 Citigroup
parent
company
 CGMHI(2) Citigroup
Funding
Inc.(2)
 Other
Citigroup
Subsidiaries
 
Long-term debt $181.1 $25.1 $37.9 $180.9 $188.8 $15.3 $40.5 $92.6(1)
Commercial paper $ $ $37.3 $2.0 $ $ $29.1 $0.1 
 
 
 
 
         

(1)
At March 31, 2009, approximately $53.2 billion relates to collateralized advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank.

(2)
Citigroup Inc. guarantees all of CFI's debt and CGMHI's publicly issued securities.

(2)
At March 31, 2008, approximately $85.9 billion relates to collateralized advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank and $38.4 billion related to the consolidation of the CAI Structured Investment Vehicles.

        See "TARP and Other Regulatory Programs—FDIC Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program" regarding FDIC guarantees of certain long-term debt and commercial paper and interbank deposits. See also Note 1112 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 75 for further detail on long-term debt and commercial paper outstanding.


Table of Contents

Credit Ratings

        Citigroup's ability to access the capital markets and other sources of wholesale funds is currently significantly subject to government funding and liquidity support. Any ability to access the capital markets or other sources of funds, as well as the cost of these funds and its ability to maintain certain deposits, is highly dependent on its credit ratings. The table below indicates the current ratings for Citigroup.

        On January 15, 2008, Standard & Poor's lowered Citigroup Inc.'s senior debt rating to "AA-" from "AA" and Citibank, N.A.'s long-term rating to "AA" from "AA+". Standard & Poor's changed the outlook on the ratings to "negative" and removed the "CreditWatch with negative implications" designation.

        On April 18,November 24, 2008, Fitch Ratings lowered Citigroup Inc.'s and Citibank, N.A.'s senior debt rating to "AA-"A+" from "AA"."AA-." In doing so, Fitch removed the rating from "Watch Negative" and applied a "Negative Outlook". Also on April 18, 2008,"Stable Outlook."

        On February 27, 2009, Moody's Investors Service lowered Citigroup Inc.'s senior debt rating to "A3" from "A2" and Citibank, N.A.'s long-term rating to "A1" from "Aa3." In doing so, Moody's removed the ratings from "Under Review for possible downgrade" and applied a "Stable Outlook."

        On December 19, 2008, Standard & Poor's lowered Citigroup Inc.'s senior debt rating to "A" from "AA-" and Citibank, N.A.'s long-term rating to "A+" from "AA." In doing so, Standard & Poor's removed the rating from "CreditWatch Negative" and applied a "Stable Outlook." On December 19, 2008, Standard & Poor's also lowered the short-term and commercial paper ratings of Citigroup and Citibank, N.A. to "A-1" from "A-1+". On February 27, 2009, Standard & Poor's placed the ratings of Citigroup Inc. and its subsidiaries on "Negative Outlook", andOutlook." On May 4, 2009, Standard & Poor's changedplaced the outlook onratings of Citigroup Inc. and its subsidiaries on "Credit Watch Negative." On May 8th 2009 Standard & Poor's affirmed the ratings to "CreditWatchof Citigroup Inc. and its Subsidiaries. In doing so Standard & Poor's removed the rating from "Credit Watch Negative" from "Negativeand applied a "Stable Outlook".

        As a result of the Citigroup guarantee, changes in ratings and ratings outlooks for Citigroup Funding Inc. are the same as those of Citigroup Inc. noted above.

Citigroup's Debt Ratings as of March 31, 20082009

 
 Citigroup Inc.
 Citigroup Funding Inc.
 Citibank, N.A.
 
 Senior
Debt
debt

 Commercial
paper

 Senior
debt

 Commercial
paper

 Long-
term

 Short-
term

Fitch Ratings

 AAA+ F1+ AAA+ F1+ AAA+ F1+

Moody's Investors Service

 Aa3A3 P-1 Aa3A3 P-1 Aa1A1 P-1

Standard & Poor's

 AA-A A-1+A-1 AA-A A-1+A-1 AAA+ A-1+A-1

        Ratings downgrades by Fitch Ratings, Moody's Investors Service or Standard & Poor's have had and could continue to have impacts on funding and liquidity, and could also have further explicit impact on liquidity due to collateral triggers and other cash requirements. Because of the current credit ratings of Citigroup Inc., a one-notch downgrade of its senior debt/long-term rating would likely impact Citigroup Inc.'s commercial paper/short-term rating. As of April 30, 2009, a one-notch downgrade of the senior debt/long-term rating of Citigroup Inc. accompanied by a one-notch downgrade of Citigroup Inc.'s commercial paper/short-term rating would result in an approximately $12.0 billion funding requirement in the form of collateral and cash obligations. Further, as of April 30, 2009, a one-notch downgrade of the senior debt/long-term ratings of Citibank, N.A. would result in an approximately $5.0 billion funding requirement in the form of collateral and cash obligations. Because of the credit ratings of Citibank, N.A., a one-notch downgrade of its senior debt/long-term rating is unlikely to have any impact on its commercial paper/short-term rating.


Table of Contents

LIQUIDITY

        Citigroup's liquidity management is structured to optimize the free flow of funds through the Company's legal and regulatory structure. Principal constraints relate to legal and regulatory limitations, sovereign risk and tax considerations. Consistent with these constraints, Citigroup's primary objectives for liquidity management are established by entity and in aggregate across three main operating entities as follows:

        Within this construct, there is a funding framework for the Company's activities. The primary benchmark for the Parent and Broker-DealerBroker—Dealer Entities is that on a combined basis, Citigroup maintains sufficient liquidity to meet all maturing unsecured debt obligations due within a one-year time horizon without accessing the unsecured markets. The resulting "short-term ratio" is monitored on a daily basis.

        Starting in the latter part of 2008, serious credit and other market disruptions caused significant potential constraints on liquidity for financial institutions. Citigroup and other U.S. financial services firms are currently benefiting from numerous government programs that are providing Citigroup and other institutions with significant liquidity support. See "TARP and Other Regulatory Programs."


Table of Contents

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

Overview

        Citigroup and its subsidiaries are involved with numerousseveral types of off-balance-sheetoff-balance sheet arrangements, including special purpose entities (SPEs), linesprimarily in connection with securitization activities inGlobal Cards,Consumer Banking and letters of creditICG. Citigroup and loan commitments.

Uses ofits subsidiaries use SPEs

        An SPE is an entity in the form of a trust or other legal vehicle designed to fulfill a specific limited need of the company that organized it.

        The principal uses of SPEs are principally to obtain liquidity and favorable capital treatment by securitizing certain of Citigroup's financial assets, to assistassisting clients in securitizing their financial assets and to createcreating investment products for clients. For further information about the Company's securitization activities and involvement in SPEs, may be organized as trusts, partnerships, or corporations. In a securitization, the company transferring assets to an SPE converts those assets into cash before they would have been realized in the normal course of business, through the SPE's issuing debt and equity instruments, certificates, commercial paper, and other notes of indebtedness, which are recorded on the balance sheet of the SPE and not reflected on the transferring company's balance sheet, assuming applicable accounting requirements are satisfied. Investors usually have recoursesee Note 15 to the assets in the SPE and often benefit from other credit enhancements, such as a collateral account or overcollateralization in the form of excess assets in the SPE, or from a liquidity facility, such as a line of credit, liquidity put option or asset purchase agreement. The SPE can typically obtain a more favorable credit rating from rating agencies than the transferor could obtain for its own debt issuances, resulting in less expensive financing costs. The SPE may also enter into derivative contracts in order to convert the yield or currency of the underlying assets to match the needs of the SPE investors, or to limit or change the credit risk of the SPE. Citigroup may be the provider of certain credit enhancements as well as the counterparty to any related derivative contracts.

        SPEs may be Qualifying SPEs (QSPEs) or Variable Interest Entities (VIEs) or neither.

Qualifying SPEs

        QSPEs are a special class of SPEs defined in FASB Statement No. 140, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing ofConsolidated Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities" (SFAS 140). These SPEs have significant limitations on the types of assets and derivative instruments they may own and the types and extent of activities and decision-making they may engage in. Generally, QSPEs are passive entities designed to purchase assets and pass through the cash flows from those assets to the investors in the QSPE. QSPEs may not actively manage their assets through discretionary sales and are generally limited to making decisions inherent in servicing activities and issuance of liabilities. QSPEs are generally exempt from consolidation by the transferor of assets to the QSPE and any investor or counterparty.

Variable Interest EntitiesStatements.

        VIEs are entities defined in FASB Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (revised December 2003)" (FIN 46-R), and are entities that have either a total equity investment at risk that is insufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or whose equity investors lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest (i.e., ability to make significant decisions through voting rights, right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity, and obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity). Investors that finance the VIE through debt or equity interests, or other counterparties that provide other forms of support, such as guarantees, subordinated fee arrangements, or certain types of derivative contracts, are variable interest holders in the entity. The variable interest holder, if any, that will absorb a majority of the entity's expected losses, receive a majority of the entity's expected residual returns, or both, is deemed to be the primary beneficiary and must consolidate the VIE. Consolidation under FIN 46-R is based onexpected losses and residual returns, which consider various scenarios on a probability-weighted basis. Consolidation of a VIE is, therefore, determined based primarily on variability generated in scenarios that are considered most likely to occur, rather than based on scenarios that are considered more remote. Certain variable interests may absorb significant amounts of losses or residual returns contractually, but if those scenarios are considered very unlikely to occur, they may not lead to consolidation of the VIE.

        All of these facts and circumstances are taken into consideration when determining whether the Company has variable interests that would deem it the primary beneficiary and, therefore, require consolidation of the related VIE or otherwise rise to the level where disclosure would provide useful information to the users of the Company's financial statements. In some cases, it is qualitatively clear based on the extent of the Company's involvement or the seniority of its investments that the Company is not the primary beneficiary of the VIE. In other cases, a more detailed and quantitative analysis is required to make such a determination.

        The Company generally considers the following typestables describe certain characteristics of involvement to be significant:

        Thus, the Company's definition of "significant" involvement generally includes all variable interests held by the Company, even those where the likelihood of loss or the notional amount of exposure to any single legal entity is small. Involvement with a VIE as described above, regardless of the


seniority or perceived risk of the Company's involvement, is included as significant.

        In various other transactions the Company may act as a derivative counterparty (for example, interest rate swap, cross-currency swap, or purchaser of credit protection under a credit default swap or total return swap where the Companypays the total return on certain assets to the SPE); may act as underwriter or placement agent; may provide administrative, trustee, or other services; or may make a market in debt securities or other instruments issued by VIEs. The Company generally considers such involvement, by itself, "not significant" under FIN 46-R.

        Citigroup's total involvement with SPEs, including QSPEs, consolidated VIEs andidentified significant unconsolidated VIEs as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 is presented below:

 
 March 31, 2008
In millions of dollars of SPE assets

 Total
involvement
with SPEs

 QSPE assets
 Consolidated
VIE assets

 Significant
unconsolidated
VIE assets(1)

Global Consumer            
 Credit card securitizations $120,695 $120,695 $ $
 Mortgage loan securitizations  517,907  517,845  62  
 Investment funds  935    254  681
 Leasing  35    35  
 Other  16,158  14,539  1,619  
  
 
 
 
Total $655,730 $653,079 $1,970 $681
  
 
 
 
Markets & Banking            
 Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP) $71,858 $ $ $71,858
 Third-party commercial paper conduits  27,131      27,131
 Collateralized debt obligations (CDOs)  64,932    18,198  46,734
 Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs)  22,336    1,139  21,197
 Mortgage loan securitizations  87,832  87,832    
 Asset-based financing  114,901    3,179  111,722
 Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs)  37,748  9,758  15,751  12,239
 Municipal investments  15,635    991  14,644
 Client intermediation  17,094    4,627  12,467
 Other  31,359  8,568  12,954  9,837
  
 
 
 
Total $490,826 $106,158 $56,839 $327,829
  
 
 
 
Global Wealth Management            
 Investment Funds $584 $ $538 $46
  
 
 
 
Alternative Investments            
 Structured investment vehicles $46,809 $ $46,809 $
 Investment funds  16,719    6,577  10,142
  
 
 
 
Total $63,528 $ $53,386 $10,142
  
 
 
 
Corporate/Other            
 Trust preferred securities $24,121 $ $ $24,121
  
 
 
 
Citigroup Total $1,234,789 $759,237 $112,733 $362,819
  
 
 
 

(1)
A significant unconsolidated VIE is an entity where the Company has any variable interest, considered to be significant as discussed above, regardless of the likelihood of loss or the notional amount of exposure.

 
 December 31, 2007
In millions of dollars of SPE assets

 Total
involvement
with SPEs

 QSPE assets
 Consolidated
VIE assets

 Significant
unconsolidated
VIE assets(1)

Global Consumer            
 Credit card securitizations $125,109 $125,109 $ $
 Mortgage loan securitizations  516,865  516,802  63  
 Investment funds  886    276  610
 Leasing  35    35  
 Other  16,267  14,882  1,385  
  
 
 
 
Total $659,162 $656,793 $1,759 $610
  
 
 
 
Markets & Banking            
 Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP) $72,558 $ $ $72,558
 Third-party commercial paper conduits  27,021      27,021
 Collateralized debt obligations (CDOs)  74,106    22,312  51,794
 Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs)  23,227    1,353  21,874
 Mortgage loan securitizations  84,093  84,093    
 Asset-based financing  96,072    4,468  91,604
 Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs)  50,129  10,556  17,003  22,570
 Municipal investments  13,715    53  13,662
 Client intermediation  12,383    2,790  9,593
 Other  37,466  14,526  12,642  10,298
  
 
 
 
Total $490,770 $109,175 $60,621 $320,974
  
 
 
 
Global Wealth Management            
 Investment Funds $642 $ $590 $52
  
 
 
 
Alternative Investments            
 Structured investment vehicles $58,543 $ $58,543 $
 Investment funds  10,979    45  10,934
  
 
 
 
Total $69,522 $ $58,588 $10,934
  
 
 
 
Corporate/Other            
 Trust preferred securities $23,756 $ $  $23,756
  
 
 
 
Citigroup Total $1,243,852 $765,968 $121,558 $356,326
  
 
 
 

(1)
A significant unconsolidated VIE is an entity where the Company has any variable interest considered to be significant as discussed above, regardless of the likelihood of loss, or the notional amount of exposure.

2009. These tables do not include:

Primary Uses of SPEs by Consumer

Securitization of Credit Card Receivables

        Credit card receivables are securitized through trusts, which are established to purchase the receivables. Credit card securitizations are revolving securitizations; that is, as customers pay their credit card balances, the cash proceeds are used to purchase new receivables and replenish the receivables in the trust. The Company relies on securitizations to fund a significant portion of its managedU.S. Cards business, which includes both on-balance-sheet and securitized receivables.


        The following table reflects amounts related to the Company's securitized credit card receivables at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007:

In billions of dollars

 March 31,
2008

 December 31,
2007

Principal amount of credit card receivables in trusts $120.7 $125.1
  
 
Ownership interests in principal amount of trust credit card receivables:      
Sold to investors via trust-issued securities $102.8 $102.3
Retained by Citigroup as trust-issued securities  5.5  4.5
Retained by Citigroup via non-certificated interests recorded as consumer loans  12.4  18.3
  
 
Total ownership interests in principal amount of trust credit card receivables $120.7 $125.1
  
 
Other amounts recorded on the balance sheet related to interests retained in the trusts:      
Amounts receivable from trusts $4.0 $4.4
Amounts payable to trusts  1.7  1.6
Residual interest retained in trust cash flows  3.4  2.7
  
 

        The Company recorded net gains from securitization of credit card receivables of $221 million and $335 million during the first quarter of 2008 and 2007, respectively. Net gains reflect the following:

Securitization of Originated Mortgage and Other Consumer Loans

        The Company's Consumer business provides a wide range of mortgage and other consumer loan products to its customers. Once originated, the Company often securitizes these loans (primarily mortgage and student loans). In addition to providing a source of liquidity and less expensive funding, securitizing these assets also reduces the Company's credit exposure to the borrowers.

        The Company's mortgage and student loan securitizationsVIEs are primarily non-recourse, thereby effectively transferring the risk of future credit lossesdescribed in Note 15 to the purchasers of the securities issued by the trust. However, the Company's Consumer business generally retains the servicing rights.

        The Company recognized gains relatedConsolidated Financial Statements. See also Note 1 to the securitization of these mortgage and other consumer loan products of $3 million and $53 million in first quarter of 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Subprime Loan Modification Framework

        In the 2007 fourth quarter, the American Securitization Forum (ASF) issued the "Streamlined Foreclosure and Loss Avoidance Framework for Securitized Subprime Adjustable Rate Mortgage Loans" (the ASF Framework) with the support of the U.S. Department of the Treasury. The purpose of this guidance is to provide evaluation procedures and prevent losses on securitized subprime residential mortgages that originated between January 1, 2005 and July 31, 2007 and that have an initial interest rate reset between January 1, 2008 and July 31, 2010. The framework segments securitized loans based on various factors, including the ability of the borrower to meet the initial terms of the loan and obtain refinancing. For certain eligible loans in the scope of the ASF Framework, a fast-track loan modification plan may be applied, under which the loan interest rate will be frozen at the introductory rate for a period of five years following the upcoming reset date. To qualify for fast-track modification, a loan must: currently be no more than 30 days delinquent and no more than 60 days delinquent in the past 12 months; have a loan-to-value ratio greater than 97%; be ineligible for FHA Secure; be subject to payment increases greater than 10% upon reset; and be for the primary residence of the borrower.

Primary Uses of SPEs by Markets & Banking

Citi-administered Asset-backed Commercial Paper Conduits

        The Company is active in the asset-backed commercial paper conduit business as administrator of several multi-seller commercial paper conduits, and also as a service provider to single-seller and other commercial paper conduits sponsored by third parties.

        The multi-seller commercial paper conduits are designed to provide the Company's customers access to low-cost funding in the commercial paper markets. The conduits purchase assets from or provide financing facilities to customers and are funded by issuing commercial paper to third-party investors. The conduits generally do not purchase assets originated by the Company. The funding of the conduit is facilitated by the liquidity support and credit enhancements provided by the Company and by certain third parties. As administrator to the conduits, the Company is responsible for selecting and structuring of assets purchased or financed by the conduits, making decisions regarding the funding of the conduits, including determining the tenor and other features of the commercial paper issued, monitoring the quality and performance of the conduits' assets, and facilitating the operations and cash flows of the conduits.

        In return, the Company earns structuring fees from clients for individual transactions and earns an administration fee from the conduit, which is equal to the income from client program and liquidity fees of the conduit after payment of interest costs and other fees. This administration fee is fairly


stable, since most risks and rewards of the underlying assets are passed back to the customers and, once the asset pricing is negotiated, most ongoing income, costs and fees are relatively stable as a percentage of the conduit's size.

        The conduits administered by the Company do not generally invest in liquid securities that are formally rated by third parties. The assets are privately negotiated and structured transactions that are designed to be held by the conduit, rather than actively traded and sold. The yield earned by the conduit on each asset is generally tied to the rate on the commercial paper issued by the conduit, thus passing interest rate risk to the client. Each asset purchased by the conduit is structured with transaction-specific credit enhancement features provided by the third-party seller, including over-collateralization, cash and excess spread collateral accounts, direct recourse or third-party guarantees. Credit enhancements are sized based on historic asset performance to achieve an internal risk rating that, on average, approximates an AA or A rating.

        Substantially all of the funding of the conduits is in the form of commercial paper, with a weighted average life generally ranging from 30-40 days. As of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the weighted average life of the commercial paper issued was approximately 30 days. In addition, the conduits have issued Subordinate Loss Notes and equity with a notional amount of approximately $78 million and $77 million as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, with varying remaining tenors ranging from three months to eight years.

        The primary credit enhancement provided to the conduit investors is in the form of transaction-specific credit enhancement described above. In addition, there are two additional forms of credit enhancement that protect the commercial paper investors from defaulting assets. First, the Subordinate Loss Notes issued by each conduit absorb any credit losses up to their full notional amount. It is expected that the Subordinate Loss Notes issued by each conduit are sufficient to absorb a majority of the expected losses from each conduit, thereby making the single investor in the Subordinate Loss Note the primary beneficiary under FIN 46-R. Second, each conduit has obtained either a letter of credit from the Company or a surety bond from a monoline insurer that will reimburse the conduit for any losses up to a specified amount, which is generally 8-10% of the conduit's assets. Where surety bonds are obtained, the Company, in turn, provides the surety bond provider a reimbursement guarantee up to a stated amount for aggregate losses incurred by any of the conduits covered by the surety bond. The total of the letters of credit and the reimbursement guarantee provided by the Company is approximately $2.1 billion and is considered in the Company's maximum exposure to loss. The net result across all multi-seller conduits administered by the Company is that, in the event of defaulted assets in excess of the transaction-specific credit enhancement described above, any losses in each conduit are allocated in the following order:

        The Company, along with third parties, also provides the conduits with two forms of liquidity facilities that are used to provide funding to the conduits in the event of a market disruption, among other events. Each asset of the conduit is supported by a transaction-specific liquidity facility in the form of an asset purchase agreement (APA). Under the APA, the Company has agreed to purchase non-defaulted eligible receivables from the conduit at par. Any assets purchased under the APA are subject to increased pricing. The APA is not designed to provide credit support to the conduit, as it generally does not permit the purchase of defaulted or impaired assets and generally reprices the assets purchased to consider any potential increased credit risk. The APA covers all assets in the conduits and is considered in the Company's maximum exposure to loss. In addition, the Company provides the conduits with program-wide liquidity in the form of short-term lending commitments. Under these commitments, the Company has agreed to lend to the conduits in the event of a short-term disruption in the commercial paper market, subject to specified conditions. The total notional exposure under the program-wide liquidity agreement is $10.6 billion and is considered in the Company's maximum exposure to loss. The Company receives fees for providing both types of liquidity agreements, and considers these fees to be on fair market terms.

        Finally, the Company is one of several named dealers in the commercial paper issued by the conduits and earns a market-based fee for providing such services. Along with third-party dealers, the Company makes a market in the commercial paper and may from time to time fund commercial paper pending sale to a third party. On specific dates with less liquidity in the market, the Company may hold in inventory commercial paper issued by conduits administered by the Company, as well as conduits administered by third parties. The amount of commercial paper issued by its administered conduits held in inventory fluctuates based on market conditions and activity. As of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company owned less than $12 million and $10 million, respectively, of commercial paper issued by its administered conduits.

        FIN 46-R requires that the Company quantitatively analyze the expected variability of the Conduit to determine whether the Company is the primary beneficiary of the conduit. The Company performs this analysis on a quarterly basis, and has concluded that the Company is not the primary beneficiary of the conduits as defined in FIN 46-R and, therefore, does not consolidate the conduits it administers. In conducting this analysis, the Company considers three primary sources of variability in the conduit: credit risk, interest rate risk and fee variability.

        The Company models the credit risk of the conduit's assets using a Credit Value at Risk (C-VaR) model. The C-VaR model considers changes in credit spreads (both within a rating class as well as due to rating upgrades and downgrades), name-specific changes in credit spreads, credit defaults and recovery rates and diversification effects of pools of financial assets. The model incorporates data from independent rating agencies as well as the Company's own proprietary


information regarding spread changes, ratings transitions and losses given default. Using this credit data, a Monte Carlo simulation is performed to develop a distribution of credit risk for the portfolio of assets owned by each conduit, which is then applied on a probability-weighted basis to determine expected losses due to credit risk. In addition, the Company continuously monitors the specific credit characteristics of the conduit's assets and the current credit environment to confirm that the C-VaR model used continues to incorporate the Company's best information regarding the expected credit risk of the conduit's assets.

        The Company also analyzes the variability in the fees that it earns from the conduit using monthly actual historical cash flow data to determine average fee and standard deviation measures for each conduit. Because any unhedged interest rate and foreign currency risk not contractually passed on to customers is absorbed by the fees earned by the Company, the fee variability analysis incorporates those risks.

        The fee variability and credit risk variability are then combined into a single distribution of the conduit's overall returns. This return distribution is updated and analyzed on at least a quarterly basis to ensure that the amount of the Subordinate Loss Notes issued to third parties is sufficient to absorb greater than 50% of the total expected variability in the conduit's returns. The expected variability absorbed by the Subordinate Loss Note investors is therefore measured to be greater than the expected variability absorbed by the Company through its liquidity arrangements and other fees earned, the surety bond providers, and the investors in commercial paper and medium-term notes. While the notional amounts of the Subordinate Loss Notes are quantitatively small compared to the size of the conduits, this is reflective of the fact that most of the substantive risks of the conduits are absorbed by the enhancements provided by the sellers and other third parties that provide transaction-level credit enhancement. Because FIN 46-R requires these risks and related enhancements to be excluded from the analysis, the remaining risks and expected variability are quantitatively small. The calculation of variability under FIN46-R focuses primarily onexpected variability, rather than the risks associated with extreme outcomes (for example, large levels of default) that are expected to occur very infrequently. So while the Subordinate Loss Notes are sized appropriately compared to expected losses as measured in FIN 46-R, they do not provide significant protection against extreme or unusual credit losses.

        The following tables describe the important characteristics of assets owned by the administered multi-seller conduits as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007:

 
  
 Credit rating distribution
 
 
 Weighted average life
 
 
 AAA
 AA
 A
 BBB
 
March 31, 2008 1.3 years 28%62%8%2%
  
 
 
 
 
 
December 31, 2007 2.5 years 30%59%9%2%
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 % of Total Portfolio
 
Asset Class

 March 31, 2008
 December 31, 2007
 
Student loans 23%21%
Trade receivables 15%16%
Credit cards and consumer loans 12%13%
Portfolio finance 11%11%
Commercial loans and corporate credit 11%10%
Export finance 9%9%
Auto 9%8%
Residential mortgage 5%7%
Other 5%5%
  
 
 
Total 100%100%
  
 
 

Third-party Conduits

        The Company also provides liquidity facilities to single- and multi-seller conduits sponsored by third parties. These conduits are independently owned and managed and invest in a variety of asset classes, depending on the nature of the conduit. The facilities provided by the Company typically represent a small portion of the total liquidity facilities obtained by each conduit, and are collateralized by the assets of each conduit. The notional amount of these facilities is approximately $2.0 billion and $2.2 billion as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. No amounts were funded under these facilities as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007.


Collateralized Debt Obligations

        A collateralized debt obligation (CDO) is an SPE that purchases a pool of assets consisting of asset-backed securities and synthetic exposures through derivatives on asset-backed securities and issues multiple tranches of equity and notes to investors. A third-party manager is typically retained by the CDO to select the pool of assets and manage those assets over the term of the CDO. The Company earns fees for warehousing assets prior to the creation of a CDO, structuring CDOs, and placing debt securities with investors. In addition, the Company has retained interests in many of the CDOs it has structured and makes a market in those issued notes.

        A cash CDO, or arbitrage CDO, is a CDO designed to take advantage of the difference between the yield on a portfolio of selected assets, typically residential mortgage-backed securities, and the cost of funding the CDO through the sale of notes to investors. "Cash flow" CDOs are vehicles in which the CDO passes on cash flows from a pool of assets, while "market value" CDOs pay to investors the market value of the pool of assets owned by the CDO at maturity. Both types of CDOs are typically managed by a third-party asset manager. In these transactions, all of the equity and notes issued by the CDO are funded, as the cash is needed to purchase the debt securities. In a typical cash CDO, a third-party investment manager selects a portfolio of assets, which the Company funds through a "warehouse" financing arrangement prior to the creation of the CDO. The Company then sells the debt securities to the CDO in exchange for cash raised through the issuance of notes. The Company's involvement in cash CDOs after issuance is typically limited to investing in a portion of the notes or loans issued by the CDO, making a market in those securities, and acting as derivative counterparty for interest rate or foreign currency swaps used in the structuring of the CDO.

        A synthetic CDO is similar to a cash CDO, except that the CDO obtains exposure to all or a portion of the referenced assets synthetically through derivative instruments, such as credit default swaps. Because the CDO does not need to raise cash sufficient to purchase the entire referenced portfolio, a substantial portion of the senior tranches of risk is typically passed on to CDO investors in the form of unfunded liabilities or derivative instruments. Thus, the CDO writes credit protection on selected referenced debt securities to the Company or third parties, and the risk is then passed on to the CDO investors in the form of funded notes or purchased credit protection through derivative instruments. Any cash raised from investors is invested in a portfolio of collateral securities or investment contracts. The collateral is then used to support the CDO's obligations on the credit default swaps written to counterparties. The Company's involvement in synthetic CDOs after issuance generally includes purchasing credit protection through credit default swaps with the CDO, owning a portion of the capital structure of the CDO in the form of both unfunded derivative positions (primarily super senior exposures discussed below) and funded notes, entering into interest rate swap and total return swap transactions with the CDO, lending to the CDO, and making a market in those funded notes.

        The following table describes credit ratings of assets of unconsolidated CDOs with which the Company had significant involvement as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007:

 
  
 Credit rating distribution
 
 
 Weighted
average
life

 A or
higher

 BBB
 BB/B
 CCC
 Unrated
 
March 31, 2008 4.6 years 28%27%14%25%6%
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
December 31, 2007 5.1 years 40%20%12%25%3%
  
 
 
 
 
 
 

Commercial Paper CDOs (CPCDOs)

        During the second half of 2007, the market interest rates on commercial paper issued by certain CDO structures increased significantly. To pre-empt the formal exercise of liquidity puts provided by the Company to its CDO structures, the Company purchased all of the outstanding commercial paper issued by these entities, which totaled approximately $25 billion. Because of these purchases, which are deemed to be FIN 46-R reconsideration events, and because the value of the CDOs' commercial paper and subordinated tranches was deteriorating as the underlying collateral of the CDOs (primarily residential mortgage-backed securities) was being downgraded, the Company concluded that it was the primary beneficiary of these entities and began consolidating them in the fourth quarter of 2007.

        Upon consolidation, the Company reflected the underlying assets of the CDOs on its balance sheet in Trading account assets at fair value, eliminated the commercial paper assets previously recognized, and recognized the subordinate CDO liabilities (owned by third parties) at fair value. This resulted in a balance sheet gross-up of approximately $400 million as of December 31, 2007 compared to the prior accounting treatment as unconsolidated VIEs.

        During the first quarter of 2008 and the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company recognized pretax losses of $3.1 billion and $4.3 billion, respectively, for changes in the fair value of the consolidated CDOs' assets.

CDO Super Senior Exposure

        In addition to asset-backed commercial paper positions in consolidated CDOs, the Company has retained significant portions of the "super senior" positions issued by certain CDOs. These positions are referred to as "super senior," because they represent the most senior positions in the CDO and, at the time of structuring, were senior to tranches rated AAA by independent rating agencies. However, since inception of these transactions, the subordinate positions have diminished significantly in value and in rating. There have been substantial reductions in value of these super senior positions during the first quarter of 2008 and fourth quarter of 2007.


        While at inception of the transactions, the super senior tranches were well protected from the expected losses of these CDOs, subsequent declines in value of the subordinate tranches and the super senior tranches in the fourth quarter of 2007 indicated that the super senior tranches now are exposed to a significant portion of the expected losses of the CDOs, based on current market assumptions. The Company evaluates these transactions for consolidation when reconsideration events occur, as defined in FIN 46-R. The Company continues to monitor its involvement in these transactions and, if the Company were to acquire additional interests in these vehicles or if the CDOs' contractual arrangements were to be changed to reallocate expected losses or residual returns among the various interest holders, the Company may be required to consolidate the CDOs. The net result of such consolidation would be to gross up the Company's balance sheet by the current fair value of the subordinate securities held by third parties, which amounts are not considered material.

Collateralized Loan Obligations

        A collateralized loan obligation (CLO) is substantially similar to the CDO transactions described above, except that the assets owned by the SPE (either cash instruments or synthetic exposures through derivative instruments) are corporate loans and to a lesser extent corporate bonds, rather than asset-backed debt securities.

        The following table describes credit ratings of assets of unconsolidated CLOs with which the Company had significant involvement as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively:

 
  
 Credit rating distribution
 
 
 Weighted
average
life

 A or
Higher

 BBB
 BB/B
 CCC
 Unrated
 
March 31, 2008 5.5 years 5%6%78%0%10%
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
December 31, 2007 5.0 years 7%11%56%0%26%
  
 
 
 
 
 
 

Mortgage Loan Securitizations

        CMB is active in structuring and underwriting residential and commercial mortgage-backed securitizations. In these transactions, the Company or its customer transfers loans into a bankruptcy-remote SPE. These SPEs are designed to be QSPEs as described above. The Company may hold residual interests and other securities issued by the SPEs until they can be sold to independent investors and makes a market in those securities on an ongoing basis. These securities are held as trading assets on the balance sheet, are managed as part of the Company's trading activities, and are marked to market with most changes in value recognized in earnings. The Company sometimes retains servicing rights for certain entities. The table on page 45 shows the assets for mortgage QSPEs in which CMB acted as principal in transferring mortgages to the QSPE.

Asset-Based Financing

        The Company provides loans and other forms of financing to VIEs that hold assets. Those loans are subject to the same credit approvals as all other loans originated or purchased by the Company, and related loan loss reserves are reported as part of the Company's Allowance for credit losses. Financings in the form of debt securities or derivatives are, in most circumstances, reported in Trading account assets and accounted for at fair value through earnings.

        The primary types of asset-based financing, total assets of the unconsolidated VIEs with significant involvement, and the Company's maximum exposure to loss at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 are shown below. For the Company to realize that maximum loss, the VIE (borrower) would have to default with no recovery from the assets held by the VIE.

In billions of dollars
 March 31, 2008
 December 31, 2007
Type
 Total
assets

 Maximum
exposure

 Total
assets

 Maximum
exposure

Commercial and other real estate $48.0 $16.1 $34.3 $16.0
Hedge funds and equities  44.5  14.9  36.0  13.1
Asset purchasing vehicles/SIVs  7.7  2.3  10.2  2.5
Airplanes, ships and other assets  11.5  2.9  11.1  2.7
  
 
 
 
Total $111.7 $36.2 $91.6 $34.3
  
 
 
 

        The Company's involvement in the asset purchasing vehicles and Structured Investment Vehicles (SIVs) sponsored and managed by third parties is primarily in the form of provided backstop liquidity. Those vehicles finance a majority of their asset purchases with commercial paper and short-term notes. Certain of the assets owned by the vehicles have suffered significant declines in fair value, leading to an inability to re-issue maturing commercial paper and short-term notes. Citigroup has been required to provide loans to those vehicles to replace maturing commercial paper and short-term notes, in accordance with the original terms of the backstop liquidity facilities.


        The asset quality of the third-party asset purchasing vehicle and SIVs to which the Company had provided backstop liquidity as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 consisted of the following:

 
 Credit rating distribution
 
 
 A or
Higher

 BBB
 BB/B
 CCC
 Unrated
 
March 31, 2008 94%2%4%0%0%
  
 
 
 
 
 
December 31, 2007 96%1%3%0%0%
  
 
 
 
 
 

Municipal Securities Tender Option Bond (TOB) Trusts

        The Company sponsors TOB trusts that hold fixed- and floating-rate, tax-exempt securities issued by state and local municipalities. The trusts are single-issuer trusts whose assets are purchased from the Company and from the secondary market. The trusts issue long-term senior floating-rate notes ("Floaters") and junior residual securities ("Residuals"). The Floaters have a long-term rating based on the long-term rating of the underlying municipal bond and a short-term rating based on that of the liquidity provider to the trust. The Residuals are generally rated based on the long-term rating of the underlying municipal bond and entitle the holder to the residual cash flows from the issuing trust.

        The Company sponsors three kinds of TOB trusts: customer TOB trusts, proprietary TOB trusts, and QSPE TOB trusts.

        The total assets and other characteristics of the three categories of TOB trusts as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 are as follows:

March 31, 2008

 
  
  
 Credit rating distribution
 
TOB trust type
 Total
assets
(in billions)
 Weighted
average
life

 AAA/Aaa
 AA/Aa1-
AA-/Aa3

 Less
than
AA-/Aa3

 
Customer TOB Trusts (Not consolidated) $11.7 9.9 years 68%18%14%
Proprietary TOB Trusts (Consolidated and Non-consolidated) $22.9 21.5 years 69%28%3%
QSPE TOB Trusts (Not consolidated) $9.8 2.8 years 79%21% 
  
 
 
 
 
 

December 31, 2007

 
  
  
 Credit rating distribution
TOB trust type
 Total
assets
(in billions)
 Weighted
average
life

 AAA/Aaa
 AA/Aa1-
AA-/Aa3

 Less
than
AA-/Aa3

Customer TOB Trusts (Not consolidated) $17.6 8.4 years 84%16%
Proprietary TOB Trusts (Consolidated and Non-consolidated) $22.0 18.1 years 67%33%
QSPE TOB Trusts (Not consolidated) $10.6 3.0 years 80%20%
  
 
 
 
 

        Credit rating distribution is based on the external rating of the municipal bonds within the TOB trusts, including any credit enhancement provided by monoline insurance companies or the Company in the primary or secondary markets, as discussed below. The total assets for proprietary TOB Trusts (Consolidated and Non-consolidated) include $7.1 billion and $5.0 billion of assets as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, where the Residuals are held by hedge funds that are consolidated and managed by the Company.


        The TOB trusts fund the purchase of their assets by issuing Floaters along with Residuals, which are frequently less than 1% of a trust's total funding. The tenor of the Floaters matches the maturity of the TOB trust and is equal to or shorter than the tenor of the municipal bond held by the trust, and the Floaters bear interest rates that are typically reset weekly to a new market rate (based on the SIFMA index). Floater holders have an option to tender the Floaters they hold back to the trust periodically. Customer TOB trusts issue the Floaters and Residuals to third parties. Proprietary and QSPE TOB trusts issue the Floaters to third parties, and the Residuals are held by the Company.

        Approximately $4.5 billion as of March 31, 2008 and $5.7 billion as of December 31, 2007 of the municipal bonds owned by TOB trusts have an additional credit guarantee provided by the Company. In all other cases, the assets are either unenhanced or are insured with a monoline insurance provider in the primary market or in the secondary market. While the trusts have not encountered any adverse credit events as defined in the underlying trust agreements, certain monoline insurance companies have experienced downgrades. In these cases, the Company has proactively managed the TOB programs by applying additional secondary market insurance on the assets or proceeding with orderly unwinds of the trusts.

        The Company, in its capacity as remarketing agent, facilitates the sale of the Floaters to third parties at inception of the trust and facilitates the reset of the Floater coupon and tenders of Floaters. If Floaters are tendered and the Company (in its role as remarketing agent) is unable to find a new investor within a specified period of time, it can declare a failed remarketing (in which case the trust is unwound) or may choose to buy the Floaters into its own inventory and may continue to try to sell it to a third party investor. While the levels of the Company's inventory of Floaters fluctuates, the Company held approximately $0.4 billion and $0.9 billion of Floater inventory related to the TOB programs as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.

        If a trust is unwound early due to an event other than a credit event on the underlying municipal bond, the underlying municipal bond is sold in the secondary market. If there is an accompanying shortfall in the trust's cash flows to fund the redemption of the Floaters after the sale of the underlying municipal bond, the trust draws on a liquidity agreement in an amount equal to the shortfall. Liquidity agreements are generally provided to the trust directly by the Company. For customer TOBs where the Residual is less than 25% of the trust's capital structure, the Company has a reimbursement agreement with the Residual holder under which the Residual holder reimburses the Company for any payment made under the liquidity arrangement. Through this reimbursement agreement, the Residual holder remains economically exposed to fluctuations in value of the municipal bond. These reimbursement agreements are actively margined based on changes in value of the underlying municipal bond to mitigate the Company's counterparty credit risk. In cases where a third party provides liquidity to a proprietary or QSPE TOB trust, a similar reimbursement arrangement is made whereby the Company (or a consolidated subsidiary of the Company) as Residual holder absorbs any losses incurred by the liquidity provider. As of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, liquidity agreements provided with respect to customer TOB trusts totaled $10.4 billion and $14.4 billion, offset by reimbursement agreements in place with a notional amount of $8.1 billion and $11.5 billion, respectively. The remaining exposure relates to TOB transactions where the Residual owned by the customer is at least 25% of the bond value at the inception of the transaction. In addition, the Company has provided liquidity arrangements with a notional amount of $9.5 billion as of March 31, 2008, and $11.4 billion as of December 31, 2007, to QSPE TOB trusts and other non-consolidated proprietary TOB trusts described above.

        The Company considers the customer and proprietary TOB trusts (excluding QSPE TOB trusts) to be variable interest entities within the scope of FIN 46-R. Because third party investors hold the Residual and Floater interests in the customer TOB trusts, the Company's involvement and variable interests include only its role as remarketing agent and liquidity provider. On the basis of the variability absorbed by the customer through the reimbursement arrangement or significant residual investment, the Company does not consolidate the Customer TOB trusts. The Company's variable interests in the Proprietary TOB trusts include the Residual as well as the remarketing and liquidity agreements with the trusts. On the basis of the variability absorbed through these contracts (primarily the Residual), the Company generally consolidates the Proprietary TOB trusts. Finally, certain proprietary TOB trusts and QSPE TOB trusts are not consolidated by application of specific accounting literature. For the nonconsolidated proprietary TOB trusts and QSPE TOB trusts, the Company recognizes only its residual investment on its balance sheet at fair value and the third-party financing raised by the trusts is off-balance sheet.

Municipal Investments

        Municipal Investment transactions represent partnerships that finance the construction and rehabilitation of low-income affordable rental housing. The Company generally invests in these partnerships as a limited partner and earns a return primarily through the receipt of tax credits earned from the affordable housing investments made by the partnership.

Client Intermediation

        Client intermediation transactions represent a range of transactions designed to provide investors with specified returns based on the returns of an underlying security, referenced asset or index. These transactions include credit-linked notes and equity-linked notes. In these transactions, the SPE typically obtains exposure to the underlying security, referenced asset or index through a derivative instrument such as a total return swap or a credit default swap. In turn, the SPE issues notes to investors that pay a return based on the specified underlying security, referenced asset or index. The SPE invests the proceeds in a financial asset or a guaranteed insurance contract (GIC) that serves as collateral for the derivative contract over the term of the transaction. The Company's involvement in these transactions includes being the counterparty to the SPE's derivative instruments and investing in a portion of the notes issued by the SPE. In certain transactions, the investor's maximum risk of loss is limited and the Company absorb risk of loss above a specified level.


        The Company's maximum risk of loss in these transactions is defined as the amount invested in notes issued by the SPE and the notional amount of any risk of loss absorbed by the Company through a separate instrument issued by the SPE. The derivative instrument held by the Company may generate a receivable from the SPE (for example, where the Company purchases credit protection from the SPE in connection with the SPE's issuance of a credit-linked note), which is collateralized by the assets owned by the SPE. These derivative instruments are not considered to be variable interests under FIN 46-R and any associated receivables are not included in the calculation of maximum exposure to the SPE.

Mutual Fund Deferred Sales Commission (DSC) Securitizations

        Mutual Fund Deferred Sales Commission (DSC) receivables are assets purchased from distributors of mutual funds that are backed by distribution fees and contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) generated by the distribution of certain shares to mutual fund investors. These share investors pay no upfront load, but the shareholder agrees to pay, in addition to the management fee imposed by the mutual fund, the distribution fee over a period of time and the CDSC (a penalty for early redemption to recover lost distribution fees). Asset managers use the proceeds from the sale of DSC receivables to cover sales commissions owed to brokers associated with the shares sold.

        The Company purchases these receivables from mutual fund distributors and sells a diversified pool of receivables to a trust. The trust in turn issues two tranches of securities:

Primary Uses of SPEs by Alternative Investments

Structured Investment Vehicles

        Structured Investment Vehicles (SIVs) are SPEs that issue junior notes and senior debt (medium-term notes and short-term commercial paper) to fund the purchase of high quality assets. The junior notes are subject to the "first loss" risk of the SIVs. The SIVs provide a variable return to the junior note investors based on the net spread between the cost to issue the senior debt and the return realized by the high quality assets. The Company acts as investment manager for the SIVs and, prior to December 13, 2007, was not contractually obligated to provide liquidity facilities or guarantees to the SIVs.

        In response to the ratings review of the outstanding senior debt of the SIVs, for a possible downgrade announced by two ratings agencies and the continued reduction of liquidity in the SIV-related asset-backed commercial paper and medium-term note markets, on December 13, 2007, Citigroup announced its commitment to provide support facilities that would support the SIVs' senior debt ratings. As a result of this commitment, Citigroup became the SIVs' primary beneficiary and began consolidating these entities.

        On February 12, 2008, Citigroup finalized the terms of the support facilities, which take the form of a commitment to provide mezzanine capital to the SIVs in the event the market value of their junior notes approaches zero. The facilities rank senior to the junior notes but junior to the commercial paper and medium-term notes. The facilities are on arm's-length terms. Interest will be paid on the drawn amount of the facilities and a commitment fee will be paid on the unused portion. The termination date of the facilities is January 15, 2011, cancelable at any time at the discretion of the SIVs.

        The impact of this consolidation on Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 is as follows:

In billions of dollars
 March 31,
2008

 December 31,
2007

Assets      
 Cash and due from banks $12.0 $11.8
 Trading account assets  34.2  46.4
 Other assets  0.6  0.3
  
 
Total assets $46.8 $58.5
  
 
Liabilities      
 Short-term borrowings $4.2 $11.7
 Long-term borrowings  41.6  45.9
 Other liabilities  1.0  0.9
  
 
Total liabilities $46.8 $58.5
  
 

        Balances include intercompany assets of $1 billion and intercompany liabilities of $7 billion as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, which are eliminated in consolidation. In addition, Long-term borrowings include the current portion of medium-term notes with an original maturity of greater than 364 days.


        The following tables summarize the seven Citigroup-advised SIVs as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 as well as the aggregate asset mix and credit quality of the SIV assets.

In billions of dollars
 March 31, 2008
 December 31, 2007
SIV
 Assets
 Short-term
borrowings

 Long-term
borrowings

 Assets
 Short-term
borrowings

 Long-term
borrowings

Beta $13.0 $0.1 $12.7 $14.8 $0.4 $14.2
Centauri  12.8  0.0  12.4  14.9  0.8  13.8
Dorada  6.8  0.3  6.4  8.4  1.0  7.2
Five  6.6  0.5  5.9  8.7  2.6  6.0
Sedna  5.8  2.5  3.3  9.1  5.5  3.6
Zela  1.3  0.7  0.6  1.9  1.1  0.7
Vetra  0.5  0.1  0.3  0.7  0.3  0.4
  
 
 
 
 
 
Total $46.8 $4.2 $41.6 $58.5 $11.7 $45.9
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 March 31, 2008
 December 31, 2007
 
 
 Average
Asset

 Average Credit Quality(1)(2)
 Average
Asset

 Average Credit Quality(1)(2)
 
 
 Mix
 Aaa
 Aa
 A/Baa(3)
 Mix
 Aaa
 Aa
 A
 
Financial Institutions Debt 61%12%43%6%59%12%43%4%
Sovereign Debt     1%1%  
Structured Finance                 
MBS—Non-U.S. residential 12%12%  12%12%  
CBOs, CLOs, CDOs 6%6%  6%6%  
MBS—U.S. residential 6%6%  7%7%  
CMBS 4%4%  4%4%  
Student loans 6%6%  6%6%  
Credit cards 5%5%  5%5%  
Total Structured Finance 39%39%  40%40%  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total 100%51%43%6%100%53%43%4%
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

(1)
Credit ratings based on Moody's ratings as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007.

(2)
The SIVs have no direct exposure to U.S. subprime assets and have approximately $51 million and $50 million of indirect exposure to subprime assets through CDOs, which are Aaa rated and carry credit enhancements as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007.

(3)
The breakout between A rated financial institution debt and Baa rated debt is 4% and 2% respectively.

Investment Funds

        The Company is the investment manager for certain investment funds that invest in various asset classes including private equity, hedge funds, real estate, fixed income and infrastructure. The Company earns a management fee which is a percentage of capital under management, and may earn performance fees. In addition, for some of these funds, the Company has an ownership interest in the investment funds.

        The Company has also established a number of investment funds as opportunities for qualified employees to invest in private equity investments. The Company acts as investment manager to these funds and may provide employees with financing on both a recourse and non-recourse basis for a portion of the employees' investment commitments.

Certain Fixed Income Funds Managed by Alternative Investments

Falcon multi-strategy fixed income funds

        On February 20, 2008, the Company entered into a $500 million credit facility with the Falcon multi-strategy fixed income funds (the "Falcon funds") managed by Alternative Investments. As a result of providing this facility, the Company became the primary beneficiary of the Falcon funds and consolidated the assets and liabilities in its Consolidated Balance Sheet. At March 31, 2008, the total assets of the Falcon funds were approximately $4 billion.

ASTA/MAT municipal funds

        On March 3, 2008, the Company made an equity investment of $661 million (under a $1 billion commitment) which provides for gain sharing with unaffiliated investors, in the Municipal Opportunity Funds (MOFs). The MOFs are funds managed by Alternative Investments that make leveraged investments in tax-exempt municipal bonds and accept investments through feeder funds known as ASTA and MAT. As a result of the Company's equity commitment, the Company became the primary beneficiary of the MOFs and consolidated the assets and liabilities in its Consolidated Balance Sheet. At March 31, 2008, the total assets of the MOFs were approximately $2 billion.


Primary Uses of SPEs by Corporate/Other

Trust Preferred Securities

        The Company has raised financing through the issuance of trust preferred securities. In these transactions, the Company forms a statutory business trust and owns all of the voting equity shares of the trust. The trust issues preferred equity securities to third-party investors and invests the gross proceeds in junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures issued by the Company. These trusts have no assets, operations, revenues or cash flows other than those related to the issuance, administration, and repayment of the preferred equity securities held by third-party investors. These trusts' obligations are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Company.

        Because the sole asset of the trust is a receivable from the Company, the Company is not permitted to consolidate the trusts under FIN 46-R, even though the Company owns all of the voting equity shares of the trust, has fully guaranteed the trusts' obligations, and has the right to redeem the preferred securities in certain circumstances. The Company recognizes the subordinated debentures on its balance sheet as long-term liabilities.

        See Note 11 on page 75 for additional information about the Company's involvement with trust preferred securities. See Note 14 on page 80 for additional information regarding the Company's off-balance-sheet arrangements with respect to securitizations and SPEs.

EliminationFinancial Statements, "Elimination of QSPEs and Changes in the FIN 46(R) Consolidation ModelModel."

 
  
  
 Credit rating distribution 
Citi-Administered Asset-Backed Commercial Paper Conduits Total
assets
(in billions)
 Weighted
average
life
 AAA AA A BBB/BBB+
and below
 

 $50.3 4.1 years  43% 37% 17% 3%
              


Asset class% of total
portfolio

Student loans

28%

Trade receivables

10%

Credit cards and consumer loans

7%

Portfolio finance

14%

Commercial loans and corporate credit

16%

Export finance

15%

Auto

7%

Residential mortgage

3%

Total

100%


 
  
  
 Credit rating distribution 
Collateralized Debt and Loan Obligations Total
assets
(in billions)
 Weighted
average life
 A or higher BBB BB/B CCC Unrated 

Collateralized debt obligations (CDOs)

 $16.8 4.0 years  27% 14% 12% 39% 8%

Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs)

 $22.9 6.1 years  3% 2% 50% 2% 43%
                


 
 Credit rating distribution 
Municipal Securities Tender Option Bond Trusts (TOB) Total
assets
(in billions)
 Weighted
average
life
 AAA/Aaa AA/Aa1— AA-/Aa3 Less
than
AA-/Aa3
 

Customer TOB trusts (not consolidated)

 $7.8 11.5 years  53% 43% 4%

Proprietary TOB trusts (consolidated and non-consolidated)

 $15.1 19.9 years  58% 30% 12%

QSPE TOB trusts (not consolidated)

 $5.6 9.2 years  66% 27% 7%
            

        In April 2008, the FASB voted to eliminate Qualifying Special Purpose Entities (QSPEs) from the guidance in SFAS 140, "Accounting for Transfers and ServicingTable of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities." While the revised standard has not been finalized and the Board's proposals will be subject to a public comment period, this change may have a significant impact on Citigroup's consolidated financial statements as the Company may lose sales treatment for assets previously sold to a QSPE, as well as for future sales. This proposed revision could be effective as early as January 2009. As of March 31, 2008, the total assets of QSPEs to which Citigroup, acting as principal, has transferred assets and received sales treatment were $760 billion.

        In connection with the proposed changes to SFAS 140, the FASB also is proposing three key changes to the consolidation model in FIN 46(R). First, the Board will now include former QSPEs in the scope of FIN 46(R). In addition, the FASB supports amending FIN 46(R) to change the method of analyzing which party to a variable interest entity (VIE) should consolidate the VIE to a primarily qualitative determination of control instead of today's risks and rewards model. Finally, the proposed amendment is expected to require all VIEs and their primary beneficiaries to be reevaluated quarterly. The previous rules required reconsideration only when specified reconsideration events occurred. As of March 31, 2008, the total assets of significant unconsolidated VIEs with which Citigroup is involved were approximately $363 billion.

        The Company will be evaluating the impact of these changes on Citigroup's consolidated financial statements once the actual guidelines are completed.Contents

Credit Commitments and Lines of Credit

        The table below summarizes Citigroup's credit commitments as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007:

In millions of dollars

 U.S.
 Outside
of U.S.

 March 31,
2008

 December 31,
2007

Financial standby letters of credit and foreign office guarantees $53,347 $28,603 $81,950 $87,066
Performance standby letters of credit and foreign office guarantees  5,994  12,531  18,525  18,055
Commercial and similar letters of credit  1,650  8,099  9,749  9,175
One- to four-family residential mortgages  5,893  763  6,656  4,587
Revolving open-end loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties  30,266  3,346  33,612  35,187
Commercial real estate, construction and land development  3,291  812  4,103  4,834
Credit card lines(1)  961,838  157,858  1,119,696  1,103,535
Commercial and other consumer loan commitments(2)  295,614  160,897  456,511  473,631
  
 
 
 
Total $1,357,893 $372,909 $1,730,802 $1,736,070
  
 
 
 

(1)
Credit card lines are unconditionally cancelable by the issuer.

(2)
Includes commercial commitments to make or purchase loans, to purchase third-party receivables, and to provide note issuance or revolving underwriting facilities. Amounts include $238 billion and $259 billion with original maturity of less than one year at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.

        See Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 107 for additional information on credit commitments and lines of credit.

Highly Leveraged Financing Commitments

        Included in the line item "Commercial and other consumer loan commitments" in the table above are highly leveraged financing commitments, which are agreements that provide funding to a borrower with higher levels of debt (measured by the ratio of debt capital to equity capital of the borrower) than is generally the case for other companies. Highly leveraged


financing is commonly employed in corporate acquisitions, management buy-outs and similar transactions.

        As a result, debt service (that is, principal and interest payments) absorbs a significant portion of the cash flows generated by the borrower's business. Consequently, the risk that the borrower may not be able to service its debt obligations is greater. Due to this risk, the interest rates and fees charged for this type of financing are generally higher than other types of financing.

        Prior to funding, highly leveraged financing commitments are assessed for impairment in accordance with SFAS 5 and losses are recorded when they are probable and reasonably estimable. For the portion of loan commitments that relate to loans that will be held for investment, loss estimates are made based on the borrower's ability to repay the facility according to its contractual terms. For the portion of loan commitments that relate to loans that will be held for sale, loss estimates are made in reference to current conditions in the resale market (both interest rate risk and credit risk are considered in the estimate). Loan origination, commitment, underwriting, and other fees are netted against any recorded losses.

        Citigroup generally manages the risk associated with highly leveraged financings it generally has entered into by seeking to sell a majority of its exposures to the market prior to or shortly after funding. In certain cases, all or a portion of a highly leveraged financing to be retained is hedged with credit derivatives or other hedging instruments. Thus, when a highly leveraged financing is funded, Citigroup records the resulting loan as follows:

    The portion that Citigroup will seek to sell is recorded as a loan held-for-sale in Other Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, and measured at the lower-of-cost-or-market (LOCOM)

    The portion that will be retained is recorded as a loan held-for-investment in Loans and measured at amortized cost less impairment.

        Due to the dislocation of the credit markets and the reduced market interest in higher risk/higher yield instruments during the second half of 2007 and the first quarter of 2008, liquidity in the market for highly leveraged financings has continued to decline significantly during that period.

        Citigroup's exposures for highly leveraged financings totaled $38 billion at March 31, 2008 ($21 billion in funded and $17 billion in unfunded commitments). This compares to total commitments of $43 billion ($22 billion funded and $21 billion unfunded) at December 31, 2007. During the first quarter of 2008, the Company recorded a net $3.1 billion pretax write down on its highly leveraged financing commitments as a result of the reduction in liquidity in the market for such instruments.

        Subsequent to March 31, 2008, the Company transferred approximately $12 billion of loans to third parties, of which $8.5 billion relates to the highly leveraged loans and commitments. In these transactions, the third parties purchased subordinate interests backed by the transferred loans. These subordinate interests absorb first loss on the transferred loans and provide the third parties with control of the loans. The company retained senior debt securities backed by the transferred loans, and purchased protection on these retained senior positions via total return swaps. The credit risk in the total return swap is protected through margin arrangements that provide for both initial margin as well as additional margin at specified triggers. These transactions were accounted for as sales of the transferred loans. The loans were removed from the balance sheet and the retained securities are classified as available-for-sale securities on the Company's balance sheet. Due to the initial cash margin received and ongoing margin requirements on the total return swaps, and the substantive subordinate investments made by third parties, the Company believes that the transactions substantially mitigate the Company's risk related to these transferred loans.



FAIR VALUATION

        For a divisiondiscussion of fair value of assets and liabilities, see Note 16Notes 17 and 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 95.Statements.


CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure

        The Company's management, with the participation of the Company's CEO and CFO, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of March 31, 20082009 and, based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that at that date the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Financial Reporting

        There were no changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 20082009 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

        In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Company uses certain forward-looking statements whenWhen describing future business conditions.conditions in this Form 10-Q, including, but not limited to, descriptions in the section titled "Management's Discussion and Analysis," the Company makes certain statements that are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Company's actual results may differ materially from those included in the forward-looking statements, andwhich are indicated by words such as "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "estimate," "may increase," "may fluctuate," and similar expressions, or future or conditional verbs such as "will," "should," "would," and "could."

        These forward-looking statements are based on management's current expectations and involve external risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, those described under "Risk Factors" in the Company's 2007Citigroup's 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K section entitled "Risk Factors": economic conditions; credit, market and liquidity risk; competition; country risk; operational risk; fiscal and monetary policies; reputational and legal risk; and certain regulatory considerations. Risks10-K. Other risks and uncertainties disclosed in this 10-Qherein include, but are not limited to:


Citigroup Inc.

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Citigroup Inc.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
 Page No.
Financial Statements:  
 
Consolidated Statement of Income (Unaudited)—Three Months Ended March 31, 20082009 and 20072008

 

6065
 
Consolidated Balance Sheet—March 31, 20082009 (Unaudited) and December 31, 20072008

 

6166
 
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (Unaudited)—Three Months Ended March 31, 20082009 and 20072008

 

6267
 
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited)—Three Months Ended March 31, 20082009 and 20072008

 

6369
 
Consolidated Balance Sheet—Citibank, N.A. and Subsidiaries Subsidiaries—March 31, 20082009 (Unaudited) and
December 31, 20072008

 

6470

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited):

 

 
 
Note 1—Basis of Presentation

 

6571
 
Note 2—Business SegmentsDiscontinued Operations

 

6876
 
Note 3—Business Segments


77

Note 4—Interest Revenue and Expense

 

6877
 
Note 4—5—Commissions and Fees

 

69

Note 5—Retirement Benefits77


70
 
Note 6—RestructuringRetirement Benefits

 

7178
 
Note 7—Restructuring


79

Note 8—Earnings Per Share

 

7281
 
Note 8—9—Trading Account Assets and Liabilities

 

73

Note 9—Investments82


73
 
Note 10—Investments


83

Note 11—Goodwill and Intangible Assets

 

74

Note 11—Debt92


75
 
Note 12—Preferred StockDebt

 

7893
 
Note 13—Preferred Stock


96

Note 14—Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) ("AOCI")

 

7997
 
Note 14—15—Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities

 

80

Note 15—Derivatives Activities98


91
 
Note 16—Fair ValueDerivatives Activities

 

95115
 
Note 17—Guarantees and Credit CommitmentsFair-Value Measurement (SFAS 157)

 

107121
 
Note 18—ContingenciesFair-Value Elections (SFAS 155, SFAS 156 and SFAS 159)

 

110133
 
Note 19—Guarantees


139

Note 20—Contingencies


145

Note 21—Citibank, N.A. and Subsidiaries Statement of Changes in Stockholder's Equity (Unaudited)

 

111146
 
Note 20—22—Condensed Consolidating Financial Statement Schedules

 

112147


CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CITIGROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME (Unaudited)


 Three Months Ended March 31,
In millions of dollars, except per share amounts

 Three months ended March 31, 
In millions of dollars, except per share amounts

2008
 2007(1)
 2009 2008(1) 
 
Interest revenue $29,950 $28,174 $20,609 $29,190 
Interest expense 16,477 17,562 7,711 16,122 
 
 
     
Net interest revenue $13,473 $10,612 $12,898 $13,068 
 
 
     
Commissions and fees $1,671 $5,602 $4,326 $1,576 
Principal transactions (6,661) 3,168 3,794 (6,663)
Administration and other fiduciary fees 2,317 1,949 1,662 2,298 
Realized gains (losses) from sales of investments (119) 473
Realized gains (losses) on sales of investments 757 197 
Other-than-temporary impairment losses on investments (For the three months ended March 31, 2009, gross impairment losses were $1,379 of which $631 was recognized in AOCI.)(2) (748) (316)
Insurance premiums 983 838 755 843 
Other revenue 1,555 2,817 1,345 1,438 
 
 
     
Total non-interest revenues $(254)$14,847 $11,891 $(627)
 
 
     
Total revenues, net of interest expense $13,219 $25,459 $24,789 $12,441 
 
 
     
Provision for credit losses and for benefits and claims    
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims 
Provision for loan losses $5,751 $2,706 $9,915 $5,577 
Policyholder benefits and claims 275 261 332 275 
Provision for unfunded lending commitments   60  
 
 
     
Total provision for credit losses and for benefits and claims $6,026 $2,967
Total provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims $10,307 $5,852 
 
 
     
Operating expenses     
Compensation and benefits $9,080 $8,699 $6,419 $8,764 
Net occupancy expense 1,788 1,529
Technology/communication expense 1,226 979
Advertising and marketing expense 679 617
Restructuring expense 15 1,377
Other operating expenses 3,428 2,370
Premises and equipment 1,144 1,356 
Technology/communication 1,179 1,542 
Advertising and marketing 343 636 
Restructuring (13) 15 
Other operating 3,015 3,462 
 
 
     
Total operating expenses $16,216 $15,571 $12,087 $15,775 
 
 
     
Income (loss) before income taxes and minority interest $(9,023)$6,921
Provision (benefits) for income taxes (3,891) 1,862
Minority interest, net of income taxes (21) 47
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes $2,395 $(9,186)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes 785 (3,939)
     
Income (loss) from continuing operations $1,610 $(5,247)
     
Discontinued operations 
Income (loss) from discontinued operations $(18)$163 
Gain (loss) on sale (12)  
Provision (benefit) for income taxes 3 48 
     
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes $(33)$115 
     
Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling Interests $1,577 $(5,132)
Net Income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling Interests (16) (21)
     
Citigroup's net income (loss) $1,593 $(5,111)
     
Basic earnings per share(3) 
Income (loss) from continuing operations $(0.18)$(1.06)
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes  0.03 
 
 
     
Net income (loss) $(5,111)$5,012 $(0.18)$(1.03)
 
 
     
Basic earnings per share $(1.02)$1.02
 
 
Weighted average common shares outstanding 5,085.6 4,877.0 5,385.0 5,085.6 
 
 
     
Diluted earnings per share(2) $(1.02)$1.01
Diluted earnings per share(3) 
Income (loss) from continuing operations $(0.18)$(1.06)
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes  0.03 
     
Net income (loss) $(0.18)$(1.03)
 
 
     
Adjusted weighted average common shares outstanding 5,591.1 4,967.9 5,953.3 5,575.7 
 
 
     

(1)
Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.

(2)
Diluted Shares usedFirst quarter 2009 OTTI losses on investments are accounted for in accordance FSP FAS 115-2 (see "Accounting Changes" in Note 1).

(3)
The Company adopted FSP EITF 03-6-1 on January 1, 2009. All prior periods have been restated to conform to the dilutedcurrent presentation. The Diluted EPS calculation represent basic shares for the first quarter of 2009 and 2008 utilizes Basic shares and Income available to common shareholders (Basic) due to the net loss.negative Income available to common shareholders. Using actual dilutedDiluted shares and Income available to common shareholders (Diluted) would result in anti-dilution.

See Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.


CITIGROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

In millions of dollars, except shares

In millions of dollars, except shares

 March 31,
2008

 December 31,
2007

 In millions of dollars, except shares March 31,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 


 (Unaudited)
  
 
 (Unaudited)
  
 
AssetsAssets     Assets 
Cash and due from banks (including segregated cash and other deposits)Cash and due from banks (including segregated cash and other deposits) $30,837 $38,206 Cash and due from banks (including segregated cash and other deposits) $31,063 $29,253 
Deposits at interest with banks 73,318 69,366 
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell (including $77,126 and $84,305 as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, at fair value) 239,006 274,066 
Deposits with banksDeposits with banks 159,503 170,331 
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell (including $79,674 and $70,305 as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value)Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell (including $79,674 and $70,305 as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value) 179,603 184,133 
Brokerage receivablesBrokerage receivables 65,653 57,359 Brokerage receivables 43,329 44,278 
Trading account assets (including $140,404 and $157,221 pledged to creditors as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively) 578,437 538,984 
Investments (including $22,306 and $21,449 pledged to creditors as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively) 204,155 215,008 
Trading account assets (including $119,211 and $148,703 pledged to creditors at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively)Trading account assets (including $119,211 and $148,703 pledged to creditors at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively) 335,222 377,635 
Investments (including $15,459 and $14,875 pledged to creditors at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively)Investments (including $15,459 and $14,875 pledged to creditors at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively) 238,806 256,020 
Loans, net of unearned incomeLoans, net of unearned income     Loans, net of unearned income 
Consumer 596,987 592,307 Consumer (including$32 and $36 at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value) 489,805 519,673 
Corporate (including $3,304 and $3,727 as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, at fair value) 192,856 185,686 Corporate (including $2,321 and $2,696 at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value) 167,487 174,543 
 
 
       
Loans, net of unearned incomeLoans, net of unearned income $789,843 $777,993 Loans, net of unearned income $657,292 $694,216 
Allowance for loan losses (18,257) (16,117)Allowance for loan losses (31,703) (29,616)
 
 
       
Total loans, netTotal loans, net $771,586 $761,876 Total loans, net $625,589 $664,600 
GoodwillGoodwill 43,622 41,204 Goodwill 26,410 27,132 
Intangible assets (including $7,716 and $8,380 at March 31,2008 and December 31,2007, respectively, at fair value) 23,945 22,687 
Other assets (including $2,648 and $9,802 as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 respectively, at fair value) 169,289 168,875 
Intangible assets (other than MSRs)Intangible assets (other than MSRs) 13,612 14,159 
Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs)Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) 5,481 5,657 
Other assets (including $8,253 and $5,722 as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 respectively, at fair value)Other assets (including $8,253 and $5,722 as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 respectively, at fair value) 163,960 165,272 
 
 
       
Total assetsTotal assets $2,199,848 $2,187,631 Total assets $1,822,578 $1,938,470 
 
 
       
LiabilitiesLiabilities     Liabilities 
Non-interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices $43,779 $40,859 Non-interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices $83,245 $60,070 
Interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices (including $1,500 and $1,337 as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, at fair value) 226,285 225,198 Interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices (including $1,188 and $1,335 at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value) 214,673 229,906 
Non-interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S.  45,230 43,335 Non-interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S.  36,602 37,412 
Interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S. (including $2,142 and $2,261 as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, at fair value) 515,914 516,838 Interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S. (including $1,061 and $1,271 at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value) 428,176 446,797 
 
 
       
Total depositsTotal deposits $831,208 $826,230 Total deposits $762,696 $774,185 
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase (including $179,917 and $199,854 as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, at fair value) 279,561 304,243 
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase (including $122,317 and $138,866 as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value)Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase (including $122,317 and $138,866 as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value) 184,803 205,293 
Brokerage payablesBrokerage payables 95,597 84,951 Brokerage payables 58,950 70,916 
Trading account liabilitiesTrading account liabilities 201,986 182,082 Trading account liabilities 130,826 167,478 
Short-term borrowings (including $9,023 and $13,487 as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, at fair value) 135,799 146,488 
Long-term debt (including $71,147 and $79,312 as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, at fair value) 424,959 427,112 
Other liabilities (including $2,568 and $1,568 as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, at fair value) 102,519 102,927 
Short-term borrowings (including $7,289 and $17,607 at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value)Short-term borrowings (including $7,289 and $17,607 at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value) 116,389 126,691 
Long-term debt (including $23,335 and $27,263 at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value)Long-term debt (including $23,335 and $27,263 at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value) 337,252 359,593 
Other liabilities (including $8,065 and $3,696 as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value)Other liabilities (including $8,065 and $3,696 as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value) 85,735 90,292 
 
 
       
Total liabilitiesTotal liabilities $2,071,629 $2,074,033 Total liabilities $1,676,651 $1,794,448 
 
 
       
Stockholders' equity     
Preferred stock ($1.00 par value; authorized shares: 30 million), at aggregate liquidation value $19,384 $ 
Common stock ($.01 par value; authorized shares: 15 billion), issued shares-5,477,416,086 shares at March 31, 2008 and at December 31, 2007 55 55 
Citigroup stockholders' equityCitigroup stockholders' equity 
Preferred stock ($1.00 par value; authorized shares: 30 million), issued shares:835,632 at March 31, 2009, at aggregate liquidation valuePreferred stock ($1.00 par value; authorized shares: 30 million), issued shares:835,632 at March 31, 2009, at aggregate liquidation value $74,246 $70,664 
Common stock ($0.01 par value; authorized shares: 15 billion), issued shares:5,671,743,807 at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008. Common stock ($0.01 par value; authorized shares: 15 billion), issued shares:5,671,743,807 at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.  57 57 
Additional paid-in capitalAdditional paid-in capital 11,131 18,007 Additional paid-in capital 16,525 19,165 
Retained earningsRetained earnings 115,050 121,920 Retained earnings 86,115 86,521 
Treasury stock, at cost: March 31, 2008—227,582,983 shares and December 31, 2007—482,834,568 shares (10,020) (21,724)
Treasury stock, at cost:March 31, 2009—158,895,165 shares and December 31, 2008—221,675,719 sharesTreasury stock, at cost:March 31, 2009—158,895,165 shares and December 31, 2008—221,675,719 shares (5,996) (9,582)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (7,381) (4,660)Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (27,013) (25,195)
 
 
       
Total stockholders' equity $128,219 $113,598 
Total Citigroup stockholders' equityTotal Citigroup stockholders' equity $143,934 $141,630 
Noncontrolling interestNoncontrolling interest 1,993 2,392 
 
 
       
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $2,199,848 $2,187,631 
Total equityTotal equity $145,927 $144,022 
 
 
       
Total liabilities and equityTotal liabilities and equity $1,822,578 $1,938,470 
     

See Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.


CITIGROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Unaudited)


 Three Months Ended March 31,
 
In millions of dollars, except shares in thousands

 
 Three Months Ended March 31, 
In millions of dollars, except shares in thousands

2008
 2007
  2009 2008 
 
Balance, beginning of period $ $1,000  $70,664 $ 
Issuance of preferred stock 19,384   3,582 19,384 
 
 
      
Balance, end of period $19,384 $1,000  $74,246 $19,384 
 
 
      
Common stock and additional paid-in capital      
Balance, beginning of period $18,062 $18,308  $19,222 $18,062 
Employee benefit plans (3,387) (913) (4,013) (3,387)
Issuance of shares for Nikko Cordial acquisition (3,485)    (3,485)
Issuance of TARP-related warrants 88  
Reset of convertible preferred stock conversion price 1,285  
Other (4) 1   (4)
 
 
      
Balance, end of period $11,186 $17,396  $16,582 $11,186 
 
 
      
Retained earnings      
Balance, beginning of period $121,920 $129,267  $86,521 $121,920 
Adjustment to opening balance, net of tax(1)  (186)
Adjustment to opening balance, net of tax(1)(2) 413 (151)
 
 
      
Adjusted balance, beginning of period $121,920 $129,081  $86,934 $121,769 
Net income (loss) (5,111) 5,012  1,593 (5,111)
Common dividends(2) (1,676) (2,682)
Common dividends(3) (63) (1,676)
Preferred dividends (83) (16) (1,011) (83)
Preferred stock Series H discount accretion (53)  
Reset of convertible preferred stock conversion price (1,285)  
 
 
      
Balance, end of period $115,050 $131,395  $86,115 $114,899 
 
 
      
Treasury stock, at cost      
Balance, beginning of period $(21,724)$(25,092) $(9,582)$(21,724)
Issuance of shares pursuant to employee benefit plans 3,843 1,904  3,579 3,843 
Treasury stock acquired(3) (6) (645)
Treasury stock acquired(4) (1) (6)
Issuance of shares for Nikko Cordial acquisition 7,858    7,858 
Other 9   8 9 
 
 
      
Balance, end of period $(10,020)$(23,833) $(5,996)$(10,020)
 
 
      
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)      
Balance, beginning of period $(4,660)$(3,700) $(25,195)$(4,660)
Adjustment to opening balance, net of tax(4)  149 
Adjustment to opening balance, net of tax(1) (413)  
 
 
      
Adjusted balance, beginning of period $(4,660)$(3,551) $(25,608)$(4,660)
Net change in unrealized gains and losses on investment securities, net of tax (2,387) 159  20 (2,387)
Net change in cash flow hedges, net of tax (1,638) (439) 1,483 (1,638)
Net change in foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax 1,273 (121)
Net change in FX translation adjustment, net of tax (2,974) 1,273 
Pension liability adjustment, net of tax 31 77  66 31 
 
 
      
Net change in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) $(2,721)$(324) $(1,405)$(2,721)
 
 
      
Balance, end of period $(7,381)$(3,875) $(27,013)$(7,381)
 
 
      
Total common stockholders' equity (shares outstanding: 5,249,833 at March 31, 2008 and 4,994,581 at December 31, 2007) $108,835 $121,083 
Total Citigroup common stockholders' equity (shares outstanding: 5,512,849 at
March 31, 2009
and 5,450,068 at December 31, 2008)
 $69,688 $108,684 
 
 
      
Total stockholders' equity $128,219 $122,083 
Total Citigroup stockholders' equity $143,934 $128,068 
 
 
      
Comprehensive income (loss)     
Net income (loss) $(5,111)$5,012 
Net change in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (2,721) (324)
Noncontrolling interests 
Balance, beginning of period $2,392 $5,308 
Initial origination of a noncontrolling interests  1,409 
Transactions between noncontrolling interest shareholders and the related
consolidating subsidiary
 (120) (2,465)
Transactions between Citigroup and the noncontrolling interest shareholders (216) (98)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest shareholders (16) (21)
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interest shareholders (6) (56)
Accumulated other comprehensive income—Net change in unrealized gains
and losses on investments securities, net of tax
 (3) 1 
Accumulated other comprehensive income—Net change in FX translation
adjustment, net of tax
 (86) 69 
All other 48 95 
 
 
      
Total comprehensive income (loss) $(7,832)$4,688 
Net change in noncontrolling interests $(399)$(1,066)
 
 
      
Balance, end of period $1,993 $4,242 
     
Total equity $145,927 $132,310 
     

 
 Three Months Ended March 31, 
In millions of dollars, except shares in thousands 2009 2008 
Comprehensive income (loss)       
Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests $1,577 $(5,132)
Net change in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)  (1,494) (2,651)
      
Total comprehensive income (loss) $83 $(7,783)
Comprehensive income attributable to the noncontrolling interest  (105) 49 
      
Comprehensive income attributable to Citigroup $188 $(7,832)
      

(1)
The adjustment to the opening balance ofbalances for Retained earnings and Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) represents the totalcumulative effect of initially adopting FSP FAS 115-2. See Note 1 for further disclosure.

(2)
Citigroup's openingRetained earnings balance in 2008 has been reduced by $151 million to reflect a prior period adjustment toGoodwill. This reduction adjustsGoodwill to reflect a portion of the after-tax gain (loss) amounts forlosses incurred in January 2002, related to the adoptionsale of an Argentinean subsidiary Banamex, Bansud, which was recorded as an adjustment to the following accounting pronouncements:purchase price of Banamex. There is no tax benefit and there is no income statement impact from this adjustment.

SFAS 157 for $75 million,

SFAS 159 for ($99) million,

FSP 13-2 for ($148) million, and

FIN 48 for ($14) million.
(2)(3)
Common dividends declared were $0.01 per share in the first quarter of 2009 and $0.32 per share in the first quarter of 2008 and $0.54 per share in the first quarter of 2007.2008.

(3)(4)
All open market repurchases were transacted under an existing authorized share repurchase plan.

(4)
The after-tax adjustment to the opening balance of Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) represents the reclassification of the unrealized gains (losses) related to the Legg Mason securities as well as several miscellaneous items previously reported in accordance with SFAS No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities" (SFAS 115). The related unrealized gains and losses were reclassified to Retained earnings upon the adoption of the fair value option in accordance with SFAS 159. See Notes 1 and 16 on pages 65 and 95 for further discussions.

See Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.


CITIGROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)



 Three Months Ended March 31,
 
 Three Months Ended March 31, 
In millions of dollars

In millions of dollars

 In millions of dollars 2009 2008(1) 
2008
 2007
 
Net income (loss) $(5,111)$5,012 
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities     
Cash flows from operating activities of continuing operationsCash flows from operating activities of continuing operations 
Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interestsNet income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests $1,577 $(5,132)
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interestsNet income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests (16) (21)
     
Citigroup's net income (loss)Citigroup's net income (loss) $1,593 $(5,111)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes (21) 115 
Gain on sale, net of taxes (12)  
     
Income (loss) from continuing operations—excluding noncontrolling interests $1,626 $(5,226)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operationsAdjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations 
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits 81 79 Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits 101 81 
Additions to deferred policy acquisition costs (105) (110)Additions to deferred policy acquisition costs (90) (105)
Depreciation and amortization 812 573 Depreciation and amortization 13 812 
Provision for credit losses 5,751 2,706 Provision for credit losses 9,975 5,751 
Change in trading account assets (39,453) (66,140)Change in trading account assets 42,413 (39,453)
Change in trading account liabilities 19,904 28,015 Change in trading account liabilities (36,652) 19,904 
Change in federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell 35,060 (21,108)Change in federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell 4,530 35,060 
Change in federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase (24,682) 44,435 Change in federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase (20,490) (24,682)
Change in brokerage receivables net of brokerage payables 2,352 (3,928)Change in brokerage receivables net of brokerage payables (11,017) 2,352 
Net losses/(gains) from sales of investments 119 (473)Net losses (gains) from sales of investments (757) 119 
Change in loans held-for-sale 6,369 (1,513)Change in loans held-for-sale (889) 6,369 
Other, net 489 (5,965)Other, net 2,911 769 
 
 
       
Total adjustmentsTotal adjustments $6,697 $(23,429)Total adjustments $9,952 $6,977 
 
 
       
Net cash used in operating activities $1,586 $(18,417)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operationsNet cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations $(8,326)$1,751 
 
 
       
Cash flows from investing activities     
Cash flows from investing activities of continuing operationsCash flows from investing activities of continuing operations 
Change in deposits at interest with banksChange in deposits at interest with banks $(3,952)$(2,384)Change in deposits at interest with banks $10,828 $(3,952)
Change in loansChange in loans (83,273) (72,413)Change in loans (31,999) (83,273)
Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loansProceeds from sales and securitizations of loans 67,525 61,333 Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans 60,329 67,525 
Purchases of investmentsPurchases of investments (92,497) (81,229)Purchases of investments (58,136) (92,497)
Proceeds from sales of investmentsProceeds from sales of investments 39,571 39,017 Proceeds from sales of investments 27,774 39,571 
Proceeds from maturities of investmentsProceeds from maturities of investments 58,849 34,393 Proceeds from maturities of investments 32,928 58,849 
Capital expenditures on premises and equipmentCapital expenditures on premises and equipment (744) (784)Capital expenditures on premises and equipment (282) (744)
Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment, subsidiaries and affiliates, and repossessed assetsProceeds from sales of premises and equipment, subsidiaries and affiliates, and repossessed assets 1,165 516 Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment, subsidiaries and affiliates, and repossessed assets 1,032 1,165 
Business acquisitions  (2,353)
 
 
       
Net cash used in investing activities $(13,356)$(23,904)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing operationsNet cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing operations $42,474 $(13,356)
 
 
       
Cash flows from financing activities     
Cash flows from financing activities of continuing operationsCash flows from financing activities of continuing operations 
Dividends paidDividends paid $(1,759)$(2,698)Dividends paid $(1,074)$(1,759)
Issuance of common stockIssuance of common stock 46 394 Issuance of common stock  46 
Issuance of preferred stock 19,384  
Issuance (redemptions) of preferred stockIssuance (redemptions) of preferred stock  19,384 
Treasury stock acquiredTreasury stock acquired (6) (645)Treasury stock acquired (1) (6)
Stock tendered for payment of withholding taxesStock tendered for payment of withholding taxes (286) (819)Stock tendered for payment of withholding taxes (88) (286)
Issuance of long-term debtIssuance of long-term debt 19,900 34,760 Issuance of long-term debt 65,398 19,900 
Payments and redemptions of long-term debtPayments and redemptions of long-term debt (27,502) (25,393)Payments and redemptions of long-term debt (74,055) (27,502)
Change in depositsChange in deposits 4,978 24,902 Change in deposits (11,489) 4,978 
Change in short-term borrowingsChange in short-term borrowings (10,689) 9,718 Change in short-term borrowings (10,302) (10,689)
 
 
       
Net cash provided by financing activities $4,066 $40,219 
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities of continuing operationsNet cash (used in) provided by financing activities of continuing operations $(31,611)$4,066 
 
 
       
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalentsEffect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents $335 $9 Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents $(756)$335 
     
Net cash from discontinued operationsNet cash from discontinued operations $29 $(165)
 
 
       
Change in cash and due from banksChange in cash and due from banks $(7,369)$(2,093)Change in cash and due from banks $1,810 $(7,369)
Cash and due from banks at beginning of periodCash and due from banks at beginning of period $38,206 $26,514 Cash and due from banks at beginning of period $29,253 $38,206 
 
 
       
Cash and due from banks at end of periodCash and due from banks at end of period $30,837 $24,421 Cash and due from banks at end of period $31,063 $30,837 
 
 
       
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information     
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information for continuing operationsSupplemental disclosure of cash flow information for continuing operations 
Cash paid during the period for income taxesCash paid during the period for income taxes $(141)$1,826 Cash paid during the period for income taxes $1,111 $(141)
Cash paid during the period for interestCash paid during the period for interest $17,120 $15,332 Cash paid during the period for interest $8,362 $17,120 
 
 
       
Non-cash investing activitiesNon-cash investing activities     Non-cash investing activities 
Transfers to repossessed assetsTransfers to repossessed assets $766 $453 Transfers to repossessed assets $643 $766 
 
 
       

(1)
Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation

See Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.


CITIBANK, N.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

In millions of dollars, except shares

In millions of dollars, except shares

 March 31,
2008

 December 31,
2007

  March 31,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 


 (Unaudited)

  
  (Unaudited)
  
 
AssetsAssets      
Cash and due from banksCash and due from banks $23,138 $28,966  $24,479 $22,107 
Deposits at interest with banks 58,460 57,216 
Deposits with banks 148,462 156,774 
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resellFederal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell 27,649 23,563  21,747 41,613 
Trading account assets (including $21,469 and $22,716 pledged to creditors as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively) 259,778 215,454 
Investments (including $2,769 and $3,099 pledged to creditors as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively) 135,604 150,058 
Trading account assets (including $9,924 and $12,092 pledged to creditors at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively) 165,032 197,052 
Investments (including $2,371 and $3,028 pledged to creditors at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively) 168,782 165,914 
Loans, net of unearned incomeLoans, net of unearned income 655,303 644,597  528,104 555,198 
Allowance for loan lossesAllowance for loan losses (11,972) (10,659) (19,443) (18,273)
 
 
      
Total loans, netTotal loans, net $643,331 $633,938  $508,661 $536,925 
GoodwillGoodwill 19,857 19,294  9,706 10,148 
Intangible assetsIntangible assets 10,271 11,007  7,423 7,689 
Premises and equipment, netPremises and equipment, net 7,797 8,191  4,959 5,331 
Interest and fees receivableInterest and fees receivable 8,088 8,958  6,662 7,171 
Other assetsOther assets 98,530 95,070  77,648 76,316 
 
 
      
Total assetsTotal assets $1,292,503 $1,251,715  $1,143,561 $1,227,040 
 
 
      
LiabilitiesLiabilities      
Non-interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices $43,993 $41,032 
Interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices 181,173 186,080 
Non-interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S.  40,910 38,775 
Interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S.  520,316 516,517 
Non-interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices $86,245 $59,808 
Interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices 160,306 180,737 
Non-interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S.  32,890 33,769 
Interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S.  432,378 480,984 
 
 
      
Total depositsTotal deposits $786,392 $782,404  $711,819 $755,298 
Trading account liabilitiesTrading account liabilities 89,669 59,472  79,634 110,599 
Purchased funds and other borrowingsPurchased funds and other borrowings 85,992 74,112  102,589 116,333 
Accrued taxes and other expense 11,085 12,752 
Accrued taxes and other expenses 6,475 8,192 
Long-term debt and subordinated notesLong-term debt and subordinated notes 177,192 184,317  88,525 113,381 
Other liabilitiesOther liabilities 45,840 39,352  44,338 40,797 
 
 
      
Total liabilitiesTotal liabilities $1,196,170 $1,152,409  $1,033,380 $1,144,600 
 
 
      
Stockholder's equity     
Citibank stockholder's equity 
Capital stock ($20 par value) outstanding shares: 37,534,553 in each periodCapital stock ($20 par value) outstanding shares: 37,534,553 in each period $751 $751  $751 $751 
Surplus 69,154 69,135 
Surplus 102,219 74,767 
Retained earningsRetained earnings 31,026 31,915  23,724 21,735 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(1)Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(1) (4,598) (2,495) (17,373) (15,895)
 
 
      
Total stockholder's equity $96,333 $99,306 
Total Citibank stockholder's equity $109,321 $81,358 
Noncontrolling interest 860 1,082 
 
 
      
Total liabilities and stockholder's equity $1,292,503 $1,251,715 
Total equity $110,181 $82,440 
 
 
      
Total liabilities and equity $1,143,561 $1,227,040 
     

(1)
Amounts at March 31, 20082009 and December 31, 20072008 include the after-tax amounts for net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities of ($3.204)8.535) billion and ($1.262)8.008) billion, respectively, for foreign currencyFX translation of $2.486($6.070) billion and $1.687$(3.964) billion, respectively, for cash flow hedges of ($3.093)2.116) billion and ($2.085)3.247) billion, respectively, and for pension liability adjustments of ($787)652) million and ($835)676) million, respectively.

See Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.


CITIGROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

1.     Basis of PresentationBASIS OF PRESENTATION

        The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statementsUnaudited Consolidated Financial Statements as of March 31, 20082009 and for the three-month period ended March 31, 20082009 include the accounts of Citigroup Inc. (Citigroup) and its subsidiaries (collectively, the Company). In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation, have been reflected. The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statementsUnaudited Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements and related notes included in Citigroup's 20072008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

        Certain financial information that is normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, but is not required for interim reporting purposes, has been condensed or omitted.

        Management must make estimates and assumptions that affect the Consolidated Financial Statements and the related footnote disclosures. While management makes its best judgment, actual results could differ from those estimates. Current market conditions increase the risk and complexity of the judgments in these estimates.

        Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior-period's financial statements to conform to the current period's presentation.

Significant Accounting Policies

        The Company's accounting policies are fundamental to understanding management's discussion and analysis of results of operations and financial condition. The Company has identified fivesix policies as being significant because they require management to make subjective and/or complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain. These policies relate to Valuations of Financial Instruments, Allowance for Credit Losses, Securitizations, Goodwill, Income Taxes and Legal Reserves. The Company, in consultation with the Audit and Risk Management Committee of the Board of Directors, has reviewed and approved these significant accounting policies, which are further described in the Company's 20072008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ACCOUNTING CHANGES

SEC Staff GuidanceOther-Than-Temporary Impairments on Loan Commitments RecordedInvestment Securities

        In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, "Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments," (FSP FAS 115-2) which amends the recognition guidance for other-than-temporary impairments (OTTI) of debt securities and expands the financial statement disclosures for OTTI on debt and equity securities. Citigroup adopted the FSP in the first quarter of 2009.

        As a result of the FSP, the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income reflects the full impairment (that is, the difference between the security's amortized cost basis and fair value) on debt securities that the Company intends to sell or would more-likely-than-not be required to sell before the expected recovery of the amortized cost basis. For AFS and HTM debt securities that management has no intent to sell and believes that it is more-likely-than-not will not be required to be sold prior to recovery, only the credit loss component of the impairment is recognized in earnings, while the rest of the fair value loss is recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (AOCI). The credit loss component recognized in earnings is identified as the amount of principal cash flows not expected to be received over the remaining term of the security as projected using the Company's cash flow projections using its base assumptions. As a result of the adoption of the FSP, Citigroup's income in the first quarter is higher by $631 million on a pretax basis ($391 million after-tax).

        The cumulative effect of the change included an increase in the opening balance of Retained earnings at January 1, 2009 of $665 million on a pretax basis ($413 million after-tax).

        See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Investments, for disclosures related to the Company's investment securities and OTTI.

Measurement of Fair Value through Earningsin Inactive Markets

        In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-4, "Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly." The FSP reaffirms that fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. The FSP also reaffirms the need to use judgment in determining if a formerly active market has become inactive and in determining fair values when the market has become inactive.

        The adoption of the FSP had no effect on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

Revisions to the Earnings per Share Calculation

        In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP EITF 03-6-1, "Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities." Under the FSP, unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends are considered to be a separate class of common stock and included in the EPS calculation using the "two-class method." Citigroup's restricted and deferred share awards meet the definition of a participating security. In accordance with the FSP, restricted and deferred shares are now included in the basic EPS calculation.


        The following table shows the effect of adopting the FSP on Citigroup's basic and diluted EPS for 2008 and 2009:

 
 1Q08 2Q08 3Q08 4Q08 Full Year
2008
 1Q09 

Basic and Diluted Earnings per Share(1)

                   

As reported

 $(1.02)$(0.54)$(0.60)$(3.40)$(5.59) N/A 

Two-class method

 $(1.03)$(0.55)$(0.61)$(3.40)$(5.61)$(0.18)
              

N/A    Not Applicable

(1)
Diluted EPS is the same as Basic EPS for all periods presented due to the net loss available to common shareholders. Using actual diluted shares would result in anti-dilution.

Additional Disclosures for Derivative Instruments

        On January 1, 2008,2009, the Company adopted Staff Accounting BulletinSFAS No. 109 (SAB 109)161,Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment to SFAS 133 (SFAS 161). The standard requires enhanced disclosures about derivative instruments and hedged items that are accounted for under SFAS 133 and related interpretations. No comparative information for periods prior to the effective date is required. See Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Derivatives Activities, for disclosures related to the Company's hedging activities and derivative instruments. SFAS 161 had no impact on how Citigroup accounts for these instruments.

Business Combinations

        In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141(revised),Business Combinations (SFAS 141(R)), which is designed to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial reports about a business combination and its effects. The Statement replaces SFAS 141,Business Combinations. SFAS 141(R) retains the fundamental requirements in SFAS 141 that the acquisition method of accounting (which Statement 141 called the purchase method) be used for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination. SFAS 141(R) also retains the guidance in SFAS 141 for identifying and recognizing intangible assets separately from goodwill. The most significant changes in SFAS 141(R) are: (1) acquisition costs and restructuring costs will now be expensed; (2) stock consideration will be measured based on the quoted market price as of the acquisition date instead of the date the deal is announced; and (3) the acquirer will record a 100% step-up to fair value for all assets and liabilities, including the minority interest portion, and goodwill is recorded as if a 100% interest was acquired.

        Citigroup adopted SFAS 141(R) on January 1, 2009, and the standard is applied prospectively.

Noncontrolling Interests in Subsidiaries

        In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 160,Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements (SFAS 160), which establishes standards for the accounting and reporting of noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries (previously called minority interests) in consolidated financial statements and for the loss of control of subsidiaries. Upon adoption, SFAS 160 requires that the equity interest of noncontrolling shareholders, partners, or other equity holders in subsidiaries be presented as a separate item in Citigroup's stockholders' equity, rather than as a liability. After the initial adoption, when a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained noncontrolling equity investment in the former subsidiary must be measured at fair value at the date of deconsolidation.

        The gain or loss on the deconsolidation of the subsidiary is measured using the fair value of a written loan commitmentthe remaining investment, rather than the previous carrying amount of that is marked to market through earnings should include the future cash flows related to the loan's servicing rights. However, the fair value measurement of a written loan commitment still must exclude the expected net cash flows related to internally developed intangible assets (such as customer relationship intangible assets).

        SAB 109 applies to two types of loan commitments: (1) written mortgage loan commitments for loans that will be held-for-sale when funded that are marked to market as derivatives under FAS 133 (derivative loan commitments); and (2) other written loan commitments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings under Statement 159's fair-value election. SAB 109 supersedes SAB 105, which applied only to derivative loan commitments and allowed the expected future cash flows related to the associated servicing of the loan to be recognized only after the servicing asset had been contractually separated from the underlying loan by sale or securitization of the loan with servicing retained. SAB 109 was applied prospectively to loan commitments issued or modified in fiscal quarters beginning after December 15, 2007. The impact of adopting this SAB was immaterial.retained investment.

Netting        Citigroup adopted SFAS 160 on January 1, 2009. As a result, $2.392 billion of Cash Collateral against Derivative Exposuresnoncontrolling interests was reclassified fromOther liabilities to Citigroup'sStockholders' equity.

Sale with Repurchase Financing Agreements

        During April 2007,In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FIN 39-1, "Amendment of FASB Interpretation No. 39" (FSP FIN 39-1) modifying certain provisions of FIN 39, "Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Contracts". This amendment clarified the acceptability of the existing market practice of offsetting the amounts recorded for cash collateral receivables or payables against the fair value amounts recognized for net derivative positions executed with the same counterparty under the same master netting agreement, which was the Company's prior accounting practice. Thus, this amendment did not affect the Company's consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2008.

Adoption of SFAS 157—Fair Value Measurements

        The Company elected to early-adopt SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements" (SFAS 157), as of January 1, 2007. SFAS 157 defines fair value, expands disclosure requirements around fair value and specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company's market assumptions. These two types of inputs create the following fair value hierarchy:

    Level 1—Quoted prices foridentical instruments in active markets.

    Level 2—Quoted prices forsimilar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets.

    Level 3—Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.

            This hierarchy requires the Company to use observable market data, when available, and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value.

            For some products or in certain market conditions, observable inputs may not always be available. For example, during the market dislocations that occurred in the second half of 2007, certain markets became illiquid, and some key observable inputs used in valuing certain exposures were unavailable. When and if these markets are liquid, the valuation of these exposures will use the related observable inputs available at that time from these markets.

            Under SFAS 157, Citigroup is required to take into account its own credit risk when measuring the fair value of derivative positions as well as the other liabilities for which fair value accounting has been elected under SFAS 155,(FSP) FAS 140-3, "Accounting for certain Hybrid Financial Instruments" (SFAS 155) and SFAS 159, "The Fair Value Option forTransfers of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities" (SFAS 159).Repurchase Financing Transactions." This FSP provides implementation guidance on whether a security transfer with a contemporaneous repurchase financing involving the transferred financial asset must be evaluated as one linked transaction or two separate de-linked transactions.

            The adoption of SFAS 157 has also resulted in some other changes to the valuation techniques used by Citigroup when determining fair value, most notably the changes to the way that the probability of default of a counterparty is factored in and the elimination of a derivative valuation adjustment which is no longer necessary under SFAS 157. The cumulative effect at January 1, 2007, of making these changes was a gain of $250 million after-tax ($402 million pretax), or $0.05 per diluted share, which was recorded in the first quarter of 2007 earnings within theSecurities and Banking business.

            SFAS 157 also precludes the use of block discounts for instruments traded in an active market, which were previously applied to large holdings of publicly traded equity securities, andFSP requires the recognition of trade-date gains after considerationthe transfer and the repurchase agreement as one linked transaction, unless all of all appropriate valuation adjustments relatedthe following criteria are met: (1) the initial transfer and the repurchase financing are not contractually contingent on one another; (2) the initial transferor has full recourse upon default, and the repurchase agreement's price is fixed and not at fair value; (3) the financial asset is readily obtainable in the marketplace and the transfer and repurchase financing are executed at market rates; and (4) the maturity of the repurchase financing is before the maturity of the financial asset. The scope of this FSP is limited to certain derivative tradestransfers and subsequent repurchase financings that use unobservable inputsare entered into contemporaneously or in determining their fair value. Previous accounting guidance allowedcontemplation of one another. Citigroup adopted the use of block discounts in certain circumstances and prohibited the recognition of day-one gainsFSP on certain derivative trades when determining the fair value of instruments not traded in an active market. The cumulative effect of these changes resulted in an increase to January 1, 2007 retained earnings2009. The impact of $75 million.adopting this FSP was not material.


            The following accounting pronouncements became effective for Citigroup on January 1, 2009. The impact of adopting these pronouncements did not have a material impact on Citigroup's Consolidated Financial Statements.

    Fair Value Option (SFAS 159)Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity's Own Stock

            In conjunction with the adoption of SFAS 157, the Company early-adopted SFAS 159, "The Fair Value OptionEITF Issue 07-5, "Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity's Own Stock."

    Transition Guidance for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities" (SFAS 159), as of January 1, 2007. SFAS 159 provides an option on an instrument-by-instrument basisConforming Changes to Issue No. 98-5

            EITF Issue 08-4, "Transition Guidance for most financial assets and liabilitiesConforming Changes to be reported at fair value with changes in fair value reported in earnings. After the initial adoption, the election is made at the acquisition of a financial asset, financial liability, or a firm commitment and it may not be revoked. SFAS 159 provides an opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings that resulted prior to its adoption from being required to apply fair value accounting to certain economic hedges (e.g., derivatives) while having to measure the assets and liabilities being economically hedged using an accounting method other than fair value.Issue No. 98-5."

    Equity Method Investment Accounting Considerations

            Under the SFAS 159 transition provisions, the Company elected to apply fair value accounting to certain financial instruments held at January 1, 2007 with future changes in value reported in earnings. The adoption of SFAS 159 resulted in a decrease to January 1, 2007 retained earnings of $99 million.

            See Note 16 on page 95 for additional information.EITF Issue 08-6, "Equity Method Investment Accounting Considerations."

    Accounting for Uncertainty in Income TaxesDefensive Intangible Assets

            In July 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48,EITF Issue 08-7, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,Defensive Intangible Assets." which attempts to set out a consistent framework for preparers to use to determine the appropriate level of tax reserves to maintain for uncertain tax positions. This interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 uses a two-step approach wherein a tax benefit is recognized if a position is more-likely-than-not to be sustained. The amount

    Determination of the benefit is then measured to be the highest tax benefit which is greater than 50% likely to be realized. FIN 48 also sets out disclosure requirements to enhance transparencyUseful Life of an entity's tax reserves. Citigroup adopted this Interpretation as of January 1, 2007. The adoption of FIN 48 resulted in a reduction to 2007 opening retained earnings of $14 million.Intangible Assets

            The Company is presently under audit by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for 2003-2005. It is reasonably possible that the exam will conclude within the next 12 months. An estimateFSP FAS 142-3 "Determination of the change in FIN 48 liabilities cannot be made at this time due to the numberUseful Life of items still being reviewed by the IRS.Intangible Assets."

    Leveraged Leases

            On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FASB Staff Position No. 13-2, "Accounting for a Change or Projected Change in the Timing of Cash Flows Relating to Income Taxes Generated by a Leverage Lease Transaction" (FSP 13-2), which provides guidance regarding changes or projected changes in the timing of cash flows relating to income taxes generated by a leveraged lease transaction.

            Leveraged leases can provide significant tax benefits to the lessor, primarily as a result of the timing of tax payments. Since changes in the timing and/or amount of these tax benefits may have a significant effect on the cash flows of a lease transaction, a lessor, in accordance with FSP 13-2, will be required to perform a recalculation of a leveraged lease when there is a change or projected change in the timing of the realization of tax benefits generated by that lease. Previously, Citigroup did not recalculate the tax benefits if only the timing of cash flows had changed.

    FUTURE APPLICATION OF ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

    Business CombinationsInterim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments

            In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, "Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments." The FSP requires disclosing qualitative and quantitative information about the fair value of all financial instruments on a quarterly basis, including methods and significant assumptions used to estimate fair value during the period. These disclosures were previously only done annually. The disclosures required by the FSP are effective for the quarter ending June 30, 2009. The FSP has no effect on how Citigroup accounts for these instruments.

    Fair Value Disclosures about Pension Plan Assets

            In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 132(R)-1, "Employers' Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets." This FSP requires that information about plan assets be disclosed, on an annual basis, based on the fair value disclosure requirements of SFAS 157. Citigroup will be required to separate plan assets into the three fair value hierarchy levels and provide a rollforward of the changes in fair value of plan assets classified as Level 3. The disclosures about plan assets required by this FSP are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. This FSP will have no effect on the Company's accounting for plan benefits and obligations.

    Loss-Contingency Disclosures

            In December 2007,June 2008, the FASB issued an exposure draft proposing expanded disclosures regarding loss contingencies accounted for under FASB Statement No. 141 (revised),5,"Business CombinationsAccounting for Contingencies" (SFAS 141(R)), which attempts to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial reports about a business combination and its effects. This Statement replaces SFAS 141,"Business Combinations". SFAS 141(R) retains. This proposal increases the fundamental requirements in Statement 141 that the acquisition methodnumber of accounting (which Statement 141 called thepurchase method) be used for all business combinationsloss contingencies subject to disclosure and for an acquirerrequires substantial quantitative and qualitative information to be identifiedprovided about those loss contingencies. The proposed effective date is December 31, 2009, but will have no effect on the Company's accounting for each business combination. This Statement also retainsloss contingencies.


    Elimination of QSPEs and Changes in the FIN 46(R) Consolidation Model

            The FASB has issued an exposure draft of a proposed standard that would eliminate Qualifying Special Purpose Entities (QSPEs) from the guidance in SFAS 141140,Accounting for identifyingTransfers and recognizing intangibleServicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. While the proposed standard has not been finalized, if it is issued in its current form, this change may have a significant impact on Citigroup's Consolidated Financial Statements as the Company may lose sales treatment for certain assets separately from goodwill. The most significant changes in


    SFAS 141(R) are: (1) acquisitionpreviously sold to a QSPE, as well as for certain future sales, and restructuring would be now expensed; (2) stock consideration will be measured based on the quoted market price asfor certain transfers of the acquisition date insteadportions of the date the deal is announced; (3) contingent consideration arising from contractual and noncontractual contingencies that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold will be measured and recognized as an asset or liability at fair value at the acquisition date using a probability-weighted discounted cash flows model, with subsequent changes in fair value reflected in earnings. Noncontractual contingenciesassets that do not meet the more-likely-than-not criteriaproposed definition of participating interests. This proposed revision could become effective in January 2010 and should this occur, these QSPEs will continuethen become subject to review under FIN 46(R).

            In connection with the proposed changes to SFAS 140, the FASB has also issued a separate exposure draft of a proposed standard that details three key changes to the consolidation model in FASB Interpretation No. 46 (Revised December 2003), "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities" (FIN 46(R)). First, the FASB will now include former QSPEs in the scope of FIN 46(R). In addition, the FASB supports amending FIN 46(R) to change the method of analyzing which party to a variable interest entity (VIE) should consolidate the VIE (the primary beneficiary) to that of a qualitative determination of power combined with benefits and losses instead of the current risks and rewards model. Finally, the proposed standard requires that the analysis of primary beneficiaries be recognizedreevaluated whenever circumstances change. The existing rules require reconsideration only when specified reconsideration events occur.

            FASB is currently redeliberating these proposed standards; therefore, they are probablestill subject to change. Since QSPEs will likely be eliminated from SFAS 140 and reasonably estimable;thus become subject to FIN 46(R) consolidation guidance, and (4) acquirer records 100% step-upsince FIN 46(R)'s method of determining which party must consolidate a VIE will likely change, we expect to fair value for all assets & liabilities, includingconsolidate only certain of the minority interest portionVIEs and goodwillQSPEs with which Citigroup is recorded as if a 100% interest was acquired.involved.

            SFAS 141(R) is effective for Citigroup on January 1, 2009. The Company is currently evaluatingCompany's estimate of the potentialincremental impact of adopting this statement.

    Noncontrolling Interests in Subsidiaries

            In December 2007,these changes on Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet and risk-weighted assets, based on March 31, 2009 balances, reflecting Citigroup's understanding of the FASB issued Statement No. 160,"Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements" (SFAS 160), which establishes standards for the accounting and reporting of noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries (that is, minority interests) in consolidated financial statements and for the loss of control of subsidiaries.

            SFAS 160 requires: (1) the equity interest of noncontrolling shareholders, partners, or other equity holders in subsidiaries to be accounted for and presented in equity, separately from the parent shareholder's equity, rather than as liabilities or as "mezzanine" items between liabilities and equity; (2) the amount of consolidated net income attributableproposed changes to the parentstandards and to the noncontrolling interests be clearly identified and presented on the face of the consolidated statement of income; and (3) when a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained noncontrolling equity investment in the former subsidiary be initially measured at fair value. The gain or loss on the deconsolidation of the subsidiary is measured using the fair value of any noncontrolling equity investment rather than the carrying amount of that retained investment.

            SFAS 160 is effective for Citigroup onproposed January 1, 2009. Early application2010 effective date is not allowed.presented below. The Company is currently evaluating the potentialactual impact of adopting this statement.

    Sale with Repurchase Financing Agreementsthe amended standards as of January 1, 2010 could materially differ.

            In February 2008,The pro forma impact of the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 140-3, "Accountingproposed changes on GAAP assets and resulting risk-weighted assets for Transfersthose entities we estimate would likely require consolidation under the proposed rules, and assuming application of Financial Assets and Repurchase Financing Transactions." The objective of this FSP is to provide implementation guidanceexisting risk-based capital rules, at January 1, 2010 (based on whether the security transfer and contemporaneous repurchase financing involving the transferred financial asset must be evaluated as one linked transaction or two separate de-linked transactions.

            Current practice records the transfer as a sale and the repurchase agreement as a financing. The FSP requiresbalances at March 31, 2009) would result in the recognition of incremental assets as follows:

     
     Incremental 
    In billions of dollars GAAP
    assets
     Risk-
    weighted
    assets(1)
     

    Credit cards

     $90.5 $1.3 

    Commercial paper conduits

      50.3   

    Private label consumer mortgages

      4.1  2.5 

    Student loans

      14.2  3.8 

    Muni bonds

      4.8  1.6 

    Mutual fund deferred sales commission securitization

      0.8  0.6 

    Investment funds

      1.1  1.1 
          

    Total

     $165.8 $10.9 
          

    (1)
    As of March 31, 2009, approximately $82 billion of incremental risk-weighted assets associated with Citigroup's primary credit card securitization vehicles were included in its risk-based capital ratios, as a result of having taken certain actions in support of these off-balance sheet vehicles. See Note 15 to the transfer andConsolidated Financial Statements.

            The table reflects (i) the repurchase agreement as one linked transaction, unless allestimated portion of the following criteria are met: (1)assets of QSPEs to which Citigroup, acting as principal, has transferred assets and received sales treatment as of March 31, 2009 (totaling approximately $767.7 billion), and (ii) the initial transferestimated assets of significant unconsolidated VIEs as of March 31, 2009 with which Citigroup is involved (totaling approximately $264.3 billion) that would be consolidated under the proposal. Due to the variety of transaction structures and the repurchase financing are not contractually contingent on one another; (2) the initial transferor has full recourse upon default, and the repurchase agreement's price is fixed and not at fair value; (3) the financial asset is readily obtainable in the marketplace and the transfer and repurchase financing are executed at market rates; and (4) the maturitylevel of the repurchase financing is before the maturityCompany's involvement in individual QSPEs and VIEs, only a subset of the financial asset. The scope of this FSP is limited to transfersQSPEs and subsequent repurchase financings that are entered into contemporaneously or in contemplation of one another.

            The FSP will be effective for Citigroup on January 1, 2009. Early adoption is prohibited. TheVIEs with which the Company is currently evaluatinginvolved are expected to be consolidated under the potential impact of adopting this FSP.proposed change.

    Investment Company Audit Guide (SOP 07-1)

            In July 2007, the AICPA issued Statement of Position 07-1, "Clarification of the Scope of the Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment Companies and Accounting by Parent Companies and Equity Method Investors for Investments in Investment Companies" (SOP 07-1), which was expected to be effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2007. However, in February 2008, the FASB delayed the effective date indefinitely by issuing an FSP SOP 07-1-1, "Effective Date of AICPA Statement of Position 07-1." SOP 07-1 sets forth more stringent criteria for qualifying as an investment company than does the predecessor Audit Guide. In addition, SOP 07-1 establishes new criteria for a parent company or equity method investor to retain investment company accounting in their consolidated financial statements. Investment companies record all their investments at fair value with changes in value reflected in earnings. The Company is


    currently evaluating the potential impact of adopting SOP 07-1.


    Elimination2.     DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

    Sale of QSPEs and Changes in the FIN 46(R) Consolidation ModelCitigroup's German Retail Banking Operations

            In AprilOn December 5, 2008, Citigroup sold its German retail banking operations to Credit Mutuel for Euro 5.2 billion in cash plus the FASB voted to eliminate Qualifying Special Purpose Entities (QSPEs) fromGerman retail bank's operating net earnings accrued in 2008 through the guidanceclosing. The sale resulted in SFAS 140, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicingan after-tax gain of Financial Assets and Extinguishmentapproximately $3.9 billion including the after-tax gain on the foreign currency hedge of Liabilities." While$383 million recognized during the revised standard has not been finalized and the Board's proposals will be subject to a public comment period, this change may have a significant impact on Citigroup's consolidated financial statements as the Company may lose sales treatment for assets previously sold to a QSPE, as well as for future sales. This proposed revision could be effective as early as January 2009. Asfourth quarter of March 31, 2008, the total assets of QSPEs to which Citigroup, acting as principal, has transferred assets and received sales treatment were $760 billion.

            In connection with the proposed changes to SFAS 140, the FASB also is proposing three key changes to the consolidation model in FIN 46(R). First, the Board will now include former QSPEs in the scope of FIN 46(R). In addition, the FASB supports amending FIN 46(R) to change the method of analyzing which party to a variable interest entity (VIE) should consolidate the VIE to a primarily qualitative determination of control instead of today's risks and rewards model. Finally, the proposed amendment is expected to require all VIEs and their primary beneficiaries to be reevaluated quarterly. The previous rules required reconsideration only when specified reconsideration events occurred. As of March 31, 2008, the total assets of significant


    unconsolidated VIEs with which Citigroup is involved were approximately $363 billion.2008.

            The Company will be evaluatingsale did not include the impact of these changes on Citigroup's consolidated financial statements oncecorporate and investment banking business or the actual guidelines are completed.Germany-based European data center.

    Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

            In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, "Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" (SFAS 161), an amendment of SFAS 133. The standard requires enhanced disclosures about derivative instruments and hedged items that are accounted for under SFAS 133 and related interpretations. The standard will be effective        Results for all of the Company's interim and annual financial statementsGerman retail banking businesses sold, are reported asDiscontinued operations for all periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early adoption permitted. The standard expands the disclosure requirements for derivatives and hedged items and has no impact on how Citigroup accounts for these instruments.presented.

    2.     Business Segments        Summarized financial information forDiscontinued operations, including cash flows, related to the sale of the German retail banking operations is as follows:

     
     Three Months Ended March 31, 
    In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

    Total revenues, net of interest expense

     $6 $579 
          

    Income (loss) from discontinued operations

     $(19)$159 

    Gain on sale(1)

      (41)  

    Provision for income taxes and minority interest, net of taxes

        56 
          

    Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

     $(60)$103 
          

    (1)
    First quarter 2009 activity represents transactions related to a transitional service agreement between Citigroup and Credit Mutuel as well as adjustments against the gain on sale for the final settlement which occurred in April 2009.
     
     Three Months
    Ended March 31,
     
    In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

    Cash flows from operating activities

     $19 $(818)

    Cash flows from investing activities

      (10) (975)

    Cash flows from financing activities

      (9) 1,627 
          

    Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations

     $ $(166)
          

    CitiCapital

            On July 31, 2008, Citigroup sold substantially all of CitiCapital, the equipment finance unit inNorth America. The total proceeds from the transaction were approximately $12.5 billion and resulted in an after-tax loss to Citigroup of $305 million. This loss is included inIncome from discontinued operations on the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income for the second quarter of 2008.

            Results for all of the CitiCapital businesses sold, are reported asDiscontinued operations for all periods presented.

            Summarized financial information forDiscontinued operations, including cash flows, related to the sale of CitiCapital is as follows:

     
     Three Months Ended March 31, 
    In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

    Total revenues, net of interest expense

     $9 $199 
          

    Income from discontinued operations(1)

     $1 $4 

    Benefit for income taxes and minority interest, net of taxes

      (7) (8)
          

    Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes

     $8 $12 
          

    (1)
    The $1 million in income from discontinued operations for the first quarter of 2009 relates to a transitional service agreement.
     
     Three Months Ended March 31, 
    In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

    Cash flows from operating activities

     $ $(143)

    Cash flows from investing activities

        175 

    Cash flows from financing activities

        (31)
          

    Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations

     $ $1 
          

    Combined Results for Discontinued Operations

            The following is summarized financial information for the German retail banking operations and CitiCapital business. Additionally, contingency consideration payments received during the first quarter of 2009, of $29 million pretax ($19 million after tax) related to the sale of Citigroup's Asset Management business, which was sold in December 2005, is also included in these balances.

     
     Three Months Ended March 31, 
    In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

    Total revenues, net of interest expense

     $15 $778 
          

    Income (loss) from discontinued operations

     $(18)$163 

    Gain on sale

      (12)  

    Provision (benefit) for income taxes and minority interest, net of taxes

      3  48 
          

    Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes

     $(33)$115 
          

    Cash Flows from Discontinued Operations

     
     Three Months Ended March 31 
    In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

    Cash flows from operating activities

     $19 $(961)

    Cash flows from investing activities

      19  (800)

    Cash flows from financing activities

      (9) 1,596 
          

    Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations

     $29 $(165)
          

    3.     BUSINESS SEGMENTS

            The following table presents certain information regarding the Company's operations by segment:

     
     Revenues, net
    of interest expense

     Provision (benefit)
    for income taxes

     Net income (loss)(1)(2)
     Identifiable assets
     
     First Quarter
      
      
    In millions of dollars, except
    identifiable assets in billions


     Mar. 31,
    2008

     Dec. 31,
    2007(3)

     2008
     2007(3)
     2008
     2007(3)
     2008
     2007(3)
    Global Consumer $15,207 $13,137 $493 $1,095 $1,434 $2,593 $748 $736
    Markets & Banking  (4,476) 8,926  (4,367) 869  (5,671) 2,661  1,233  1,233
    Global Wealth Management  3,274  2,818  168  251  299  448  112  104
    Alternative Investments  (358) 562  (304) 138  (509) 222  67  73
    Corporate/Other(2)  (428) 16  119  (491) (664) (912) 40  42
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Total $13,219 $25,459 $(3,891)$1,862 $(5,111)$5,012 $2,200 $2,188
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     Revenues, net
    of interest expense
     Provision (benefit)
    for income taxes
     Income (loss) from
    continuing operations(1)
     Identifiable assets 
     
     First Quarter  
      
     
    In millions of dollars, except
    identifiable assets in billions
     Mar. 31,
    2009
     Dec. 31,
    2008(2)
     
     2009 2008(2) 2009 2008(2) 2009 2008(2) 

    Global Cards

     $5,765 $6,379 $58 $664 $417 $1,226 $102 $114 

    Consumer Banking

      6,402  7,791  (1,126) (215) (1,226) 52  473  496 

    Institutional Clients Group

      9,507  (4,958) 841  (4,832) 2,833  (6,357) 949  1,003 

    Global Wealth Management

      2,619  3,279  145  159  261  294  91  99 

    Corporate/Other

      496  (50) 867  285  (675) (462) 208  226 
                      

    Total

     $24,789 $12,441 $785 $(3,939)$1,610 $(5,247)$1,823 $1,938 
                      

    (1)
    Includes pretax provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims in theGlobal ConsumerCards results of $5.8$3.1 billion and $2.7$1.9 billion; in the Markets &Consumer Banking results of $249 million$5.2 billion and $254$3.6 billion; in theICG results of $1.9 billion and $297 million; and in theGWM results of $21$112 million and $17$21 million for the first quarterquarters of 20082009 and 2007,2008, respectively.

    (2)
    Corporate/Other reflects the restructuring charge of $1.377 billion in the 2007 first quarter. Of this total charge, $942 million is attributable to Global Consumer; $277 million to Markets & Banking; $55 million to GWM; $7 million to Alternative Investments; and $96 million to Corporate/Other. See Note 6 on page 71 for further discussion.

    (3)
    Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.

    3.     Interest Revenue and Expense4.     INTEREST REVENUE AND EXPENSE

            For the three months ended March 31, 20082009 and 20072008, respectively, interest revenue and expense consisted of the following:


     Three Months Ended March 31,
    In millions of dollars

     Three Months Ended March 31, 
    In millions of dollars

    2008
     2007(1)
     2009 2008 
     
    Loan interest, including fees $17,141 $14,942 $12,855 $16,414 
    Deposits at interest with banks 805 709 432 784 
    Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell 3,172 4,289

    Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

     888 3,172 
    Investments, including dividends 2,699 3,540 3,176 2,687 
    Trading account assets(2)(1) 4,799 3,930 2,958 4,799 
    Other interest 1,334 764 300 1,334 
     
     
         
    Total interest revenue $29,950 $28,174 $20,609 $29,190 
     
     
         
    Interest expense     
    Deposits $6,300 $6,558 $2,848 $6,194 
    Trading account liabilities(2) 333 307
    Short-term debt and other liabilities 5,353 6,947

    Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

     1,119 3,903 

    Trading account liabilities(1)

     113 333 

    Short-term borrowings

     497 1,381 
    Long-term debt 4,491 3,750 3,134 4,311 
     
     
         
    Total interest expense $16,477 $17,562 $7,711 $16,122 
     
     
         
    Net interest revenue $13,473 $10,612 $12,898 $13,068 
    Provision for loan losses 5,751 2,706 9,915 5,577 
     
     
         
    Net interest revenue after provision for loan losses $7,722 $7,906 $2,983 $7,491 
     
     
         

    (1)
    Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.

    (2)
    Interest expense onTrading account liabilities of Markets & BankingICG is reported as a reduction of interest revenue for fromTrading account assets.assets.

    4.     Commissions and Fees5.     COMMISSIONS AND FEES

            Commissions and fees revenue includes charges to customers for credit and bank cards, including transaction-processing fees and annual fees; advisory, and equity and debt underwriting services; lending and deposit-related transactions, such as loan commitments, standby letters of credit, and other deposit and loan servicing activities; investment management- relatedmanagement-related fees, including brokerage services, and custody and trust services; and insurance fees and commissions.

            The following table presents commissions and fees revenue for the three months ended March 31, 20082009 and 2007:2008:

    In millions of dollars

     2008
     2007(1)
     2009 2008(1) 
    Credit cards and bank cards $1,213 $1,270 $977 $1,204 
    Investment banking 795 1,390 814 795 
    Smith Barney 763 774 515 763 
    Markets & Banking trading-related 702 686

    ICG trading-related

     347 702 
    Other Consumer 356 216 241 311 
    Transaction services 353 231 316 353 
    Checking-related 330 287 264 290 
    Nikko Cordial-related(2) 300  181 300 
    Other Markets & Banking 130 57

    OtherICG

     150 130 
    Primerica 110 116 73 110 
    Loan servicing(3) (284) 261 196 (284)
    Corporate finance(4) (3,111) 295 250 (3,111)
    Other 14 19 2 13 
     
     
         
    Total commissions and fees $1,671 $5,602 $4,326 $1,576 
     
     
         

    (1)
    Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.

    (2)
    Commissions and fees for Nikko Cordial have not been detailed due to unavailability of the information.

    (3)
    Includes fair value adjustments on mortgage servicing assets. The mark-to-market on the underlying economic hedges of the MSRs is included in Other revenue.

    (4)
    Includes write-downs recorded in the first quarter of 2008 of approximately $3.1 billion, net of underwriting fees on funded and unfunded highly leveraged finance commitments. Write-downs were recorded on all highly leveraged finance commitments where there was value impairment, regardless of funding date.

    5.     Retirement Benefits6.     RETIREMENT BENEFITS

            The Company has several non-contributory defined benefit pension plans covering U.S. employees and has various defined benefit pension and termination indemnity plans covering employees outside the United States. The principal U.S. defined benefit plan, which formerly covered substantially all U.S. employees, is closed to new entrants and, effective January 1, 2008, no longer accrues benefits for most employees. Employees satisfying certain age and service requirements remain covered by a prior final pay formula.

            The Company also offers postretirement health care and life insurance benefits to certain eligible U.S. retired employees, as well as to certain eligible employees outside the United States. For information on the Company's Retirement Benefit Plansretirement benefit plans and Pension Assumptions,pension assumptions, see Citigroup's 20072008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

            The following table summarizestables summarize the components of the net expense recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the three months ended March 31, 20082009 and 2007.2008.

    Net Expense (Benefit)



     Three Months Ended March 31,
     


     Pension Plans
     Postretirement
    Benefit Plans

     
     Three Months Ended March 31, 


     U.S. Plans(1)(2)
     Plans Outside U.S.
     U.S. Plans
     Plans Outside U.S.
     
     Pension Plans Postretirement
    Benefit Plans
     
    In millions of dollars

     

     U.S. Plans(1) Plans Outside U.S. U.S. Plans Plans Outside U.S. 
    In millions of dollars

    In millions of dollars

    2008
     2007
     2008
     2007
     2008
     2007
     2008
     2007
     In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 
     $8 $67 $51 $44 $ $1 $7 $6 

    Benefits earned during the period

     $6 $8 $37 $51 $ $ $7 $7 
    Interest cost on benefit obligationInterest cost on benefit obligation  164  163  83  74  15  15  20  18 

    Interest cost on benefit obligation

     163 164 70 83 15 15 21 20 
    Expected return on plan assetsExpected return on plan assets  (233) (222) (128) (107) (2) (3) (28) (24)

    Expected return on plan assets

     (229) (233) (78) (128) (2) (2) (18) (28)
    Amortization of unrecognized:Amortization of unrecognized:                         

    Amortization of unrecognized:

     
    Net transition obligation        1         

    Net transition obligation

             
    Prior service cost (benefit)  (1) (1) 1      (1)    

    Prior service cost (benefit)

     1 (1)  1     
    Net actuarial loss    27  9  13    1  3  2 

    Net actuarial loss

       15 9 1  4 3 
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
                       
    Net expense (benefit)Net expense (benefit) $(62)$34 $16 $25 $13 $13 $2 $2 

    Net expense (benefit)

     $(59)$(62)$44 $16 $14 $13 $14 $2 
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
                       

    (1)
    The U.S. plans exclude nonqualified pension plans, for which the net expense was $10 million and $12 million for both the three months ended March 31, 20082009 and 2007, respectively.

    (2)
    In 2006, the Company announced that commencing January 1, 2008, the U.S. qualified pension plan would be frozen. Accordingly, effective January 1, 2008 existing plan participants no longer accrue cash balance benefits. However, certain employees still covered under the prior final pay benefit formula will continue to accrue benefits.2008.

    Employer Contributions

            Citigroup's pension funding policy for U.S. plans and non-U.S. plans is generally to fund to applicable minimum funding requirements, rather than to the amounts of accumulated benefit obligations. For the U.S. plans, the Company may increase its contributions above the minimum required contribution under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), if appropriate to its tax and cash position and the plan's funded position. At March 31, 20082009 and December 31, 2007,2008, there were no minimum required contributions and no discretionary cash or non-cash contributions are currently planned for the U.S. plans. For the non-U.S. plans, the Company contributed $31$51 million as ofin the three months ended March 31, 2008.2009. Citigroup presently anticipates contributing an additional $116$109 million to fund its non-U.S. plans in 20082009 for a total of $147$160 million.


    6.     Restructuring7.     RESTRUCTURING

            DuringIn the firstfourth quarter of 2008, Citigroup recorded a pretax restructuring expense of $1.797 billion related to the implementation of a Company-wide re-engineering plan. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, Citigroup recorded a pretax net restructuring release of $10 million composed of a gross charge of $29 million and a credit of $39 million due to changes in estimates. This initiative will generate headcount reductions of approximately 20,600. The charges related to the 2008 Re-engineering Projects Restructuring Initiative are reported in the Restructuring line on the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income and are recorded in each segment.

            In 2007, the Company completed a review of its structural expense base in a Company-wide effort to create a more streamlined organization, reduce expense growth, and provide investment funds for future growth initiatives.

            For the three months ended March 31, 2008, Citigroup recorded As a result of this review, a pretax restructuring charge of $15 million.$1.4 billion was recorded inCorporate/Other during the first quarter of 2007. Additional net charges of $151 million were recognized in subsequent quarters throughout 2007, and net releases of $31 million and $3 million in 2008 and 2009, due to changes in estimates. The charges related to the 2007 Structural Expense Review Restructuring Initiative are reported in the Restructuring line on the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.

            The primary goals of the 2008 Re-engineering Projects and Restructuring Initiatives and the 2007 Structural Expense Review and Restructuring were:

            The implementation of these restructuring initiatives also caused certain related premises and equipment assets to become redundant. The remaining depreciable lives of these assets were shortened, and accelerated depreciation charges began in the second quarter of 2007 and fourth quarter of 2008 for the 2007 and 2008 initiatives, respectively, in addition to normal scheduled depreciation.

            Additional charges totaling approximately $29 million pre-tax are anticipated to be recorded by the end of the second quarter of 2008. Of this charge, $5 million is attributable to Global Consumer, $2 million to Global Wealth Management and $22 million to Corporate/Other.

    The following table detailstables detail the Company's restructuring reserves.

     
     Severance
      
      
      
      
     
    In millions of dollars

     SFAS
    112(1)

     SFAS
    146(2)

     Contract
    termination
    costs

     Asset
    write-
    downs(3)

     Employee
    termination
    cost

     Total
    Citigroup

     
    Total Citigroup (pretax)                   
     Original restructuring charge, First quarter of 2007 $950 $11 $25 $352 $39 $1,377 
     Utilization        (268)   (268)
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     Balance at March 31, 2007 $950 $11 $25 $84 $39 $1,109 
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     Second quarter of 2007:                   
     Additional Charge $8 $12 $23 $19 $1 $63 
     Foreign exchange  8    1      9 
     Utilization  (197) (18) (12) (72) (4) (303)
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     Balance at June 30, 2007 $769 $5 $37 $31 $36 $878 
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     Third quarter of 2007:                   
     Additional Charge $11 $14 $ $ $10 $35 
     Foreign exchange  8    1      9 
     Utilization  (195) (13) (9) (10) (23) (250)
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     Balance at September 30, 2007 $593 $6 $29 $21 $23 $672 
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     Fourth quarter of 2007:                   
     Additional Charge  23  70  6  8    107 
     Foreign Exchange  3          3 
     Utilization  (155) (44) (7) (13) (6) (225)
     Changes in Estimates(4)  (39)   (6) (1) (8) (54)
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     Balance at December 31, 2007 $425 $32 $22 $15 $9 $503 
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     First quarter of 2008:                   
     Additional Charge  5  5  3  2    15 
     Foreign Exchange  5          5 
     Utilization  (114) (22) (4) (2) (1) (143)
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     Balance at March 31, 2008 $321 $15 $21 $15 $8 $380 
      
     
     
     
     
     
     

    2008 Re-engineering Projects Restructuring Charges

     
     Severance  
      
      
      
     
     
     Contract
    termination
    costs
     Asset
    write-
    downs(3)
     Employee
    termination
    cost
     Total
    Citigroup(4)
     
    In millions of dollars SFAS 112(1) SFAS 146(2) 

    Total Citigroup (pretax)

                       

    Original restructuring charge

     $1,254 $295 $55 $123 $19 $1,746 
                  

    Utilization

      (114) (3) (2) (100)   (219)
                  

    Balance at December 31, 2008

     $1,140 $292 $53 $23 $19 $1,527 
                  

    Additional charge

     $14 $6 $4 $5 $ $29 

    Foreign exchange

      (14) 2    (12) (1) (25)

    Utilization

      (541) (294) (11) (7) (5) (858)

    Changes in estimates

      (38) (1)       (39)
                  

    Balance at March 31, 2009

     $561 $5 $46 $9 $13 $634 
                  

    2007 Structural Expense Review Restructuring Charges

     
     Severance  
      
      
      
     
     
     Contract
    termination
    costs
     Asset
    write-
    downs(3)
     Employee
    termination
    cost
     Total(5)
    Citigroup
     
    In millions of dollars SFAS 112(1) SFAS 146(2) 

    Total Citigroup (pretax)

                       

    Original restructuring charge

     $950 $11 $25 $352 $39 $1,377 
                  

    Additional charge

     $42 $96 $29 $27 $11 $205 

    Foreign exchange

      19    2      21 

    Utilization

      (547) (75) (28) (363) (33) (1,046)

    Changes in estimates

      (39)   (6) (1) (8) (54)
                  

    Balance at December 31, 2007

     $425 $32 $22 $15 $9 $503 
                  

    Additional charge

     $10 $14 $43 $6 $ $73 

    Foreign exchange

      (11)   (4)     (15)

    Utilization

      (288) (34) (22) (7) (6) (357)

    Changes in estimates

      (93) (2) (2) (4) (3) (104)
                  

    Balance at December 31, 2008

     $43 $10 $37 $10 $ $100 
                  

    Foreign exchange

      (1)   (1)     (2)

    Utilization

      (41) (10) (35) (9)   (95)

    Changes in estimates

      (1)   (1) (1)   (3)
                  

    Balance at March 31, 2009

     $ $ $ $ $ $ 
                  

    (1)
    Accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 112, "Employer'sEmployer's Accounting for Post Employment Benefits"Benefits (SFAS 112).

    (2)
    Accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 146, "AccountingAccounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities"Activities (SFAS 146).

    (3)
    Accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 144, "AccountingAccounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets"Assets (SFAS 144).

    (4)
    The change in estimate is attributable to lower than anticipated costs of implementing certain projects and a reductionTotal Citigroup charge in the scopetable above does not include a $51 million one-time pension curtailment charge related to this restructuring initiative, which is recorded as part of certain initiatives.the Company'sRestructuring charge in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

    (5)
    The 2007 structural expense review restructuring initiative was fully utilized as of March 31, 2009.

            Since the beginning of this initiative approximately 18,700 positions have been eliminated, after considering attrition and redeployment within the Company.


            The total restructuring reserve balance and total charges as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 related to the net restructuring charges for first quarter 2008 and the cumulative net restructuring charges incurred to date under the first quarter 2007 restructuring initiativeRe-engineering Projects Restructuring Initiatives are presented below by business segment. These net charges were includedsegment in the Corporate/Other segment because this company-wide restructuring was a corporate initiative.following tables. These charges are reported in the Restructuring line on the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income and are recorded in each segment.

     
      
     Restructuring charges
    In millions of dollars

     Ending balance
    March 31, 2008

     Three months ended
    March 31, 2008

     Cumulative
    balance since
    inception(1)

    Global Consumer $258 $11 $1,015
    Markets & Banking  43  1  300
    Global Wealth Management  28  1  97
    Alternative Investments      7
    Corporate/Other  51  2  124
      
     
     
    Total Citigroup (pretax) $380 $15 $1,543
      
     
     

    2008 Re-engineering Projects

     
     For the quarter ended March 31, 2009 
    In millions of dollars Total
    restructuring
    reserve
    balance as of
    March 31,
    2009
     Restructuring
    charges
    recorded in the
    three months
    ended March 31,
    2009
     Total
    restructuring
    charges since
    inception(1)(2)
     

    Consumer Banking

     $115 $2 $382 

    Global Cards

      58    111 

    Institutional Clients Group

      146  12  600 

    Global Wealth Management

      48    302 

    Corporate/Other

      267  15  392 
            

    Total Citigroup (pretax)

     $634 $29 $1,787 
            

    (1)
    Includes pension curtailment charges of $51 million recorded during the fourth quarter of 2008.

    (2)
    Amounts shown net of $54$39 million related to changes in estimates recorded during the first quarter of 2009.
     
     For the year ended December 31, 2008 
    In millions of dollars Total
    restructuring
    reserve
    balance as of
    December 31,
    2008
     Total
    restructuring
    charges,
    excluding
    pension
    curtailment
     Pension
    curtailment
    charges
     Total
    restructuring
    charges(1)
     

    Consumer Banking

     $265 $356 $26 $382 

    Global Cards

      111  118  1  119 

    Institutional Clients Group

      515  594  14  608 

    Global Wealth Management

      293  300  5  305 

    Corporate/Other

      343  378  5  383 
              

    Total Citigroup (pretax)

     $1,527 $1,746 $51 $1,797 
              

    (1)
    Represents the total charges incurred since inception and pension curtailment charges of $51 million recorded during the fourth quarter 2007, of which $41 million is attributable to Global Consumer, $7 million to Markets & Banking, $2 million to GWM and $4 million to Corporate/Other.2008.

    7.     Earnings Per Share8.     EARNINGS PER SHARE

            The following is a reconciliation of the income and share data used in the basic and diluted earnings per share computations for the three months ended March 31, 20082009 and 2007:2008:

    In millions, except per share amounts

     March 31, 2008
     March 31, 2007
      March 31, 2009 March 31, 2008(1) 
    Net income (loss) $(5,111)$5,012 
    Income (loss) from continuing operations $1,610 $(5,247)
    Discontinued operations (33) 115 
    Noncontrolling interest (16) (21)
    Preferred dividends (83) (16) (1,221) (83)
    Impact on the conversion price reset related to the $12.5 billion convertible preferred stock private issuance(2) (1,285)  
    Preferred stock Series H discount accretion (53)  
     
     
          
    Income available to common stockholders for basic EPS (5,194) 4,996 
    Income (loss) available to common stockholders for basic EPS (966) (5,194)
    Effect of dilutive securities 66   270 66 
     
     
          
    Income available to common stockholders for diluted EPS(1) $(5,128)$4,996 
    Income (loss) available to common stockholders for diluted EPS(3) $(696)$(5,128)
     
     
          
    Weighted average common shares outstanding applicable to basic EPS 5,085.6 4,877.0  5,385.0 5,085.6 
    Effect of dilutive securities:      
    Convertible securities 489.2   568.3 489.2 
    Options 0.9 26.7   0.9 
    Restricted and deferred stock 15.4 64.2 
     
     
          
    Adjusted weighted average common shares outstanding applicable to diluted EPS 5,591.1 4,967.9 
    Adjusted weighted average common shares outstanding applicable to diluted EPS(3) 5,953.3 5,575.7 
     
     
          
    Basic earnings per share $(1.02)$1.02 
    Basic earnings per share(3)(4) 
    Loss from continuing operations $(0.18)$(1.06)
    Discontinued operations  0.03 
     
     
          
    Diluted earnings per share(1)(2) $(1.02)$1.01 
    Net loss $(0.18)$(1.03)
    Diluted earnings per share(3)(4) 
    Loss from continuing operations $(0.18)$(1.06)
    Discontinued operations  0.03 
     
     
          
    Net loss $(0.18)$(1.03)
         

    (1)
    The Company adopted FSP EITF 03-6-1 on January 1, 2009. All prior periods have been restated to the current period's presentation.

    (2)
    The first quarter of 2009 income available to common shareholders includes a reduction of $1,285 million related to the conversion price reset pursuant to Citigroup's prior agreement with the purchasers of $12.5 billion convertible preferred stock issued in a private offering in January 2008. The conversion price was reset from $31.62 per share to $26.35 per share.

    (3)
    Due to the net loss available to common shareholders in the first quarterquarters of 2008 incomeand 2009, loss available to common stockholders for basic EPS was used to calculate diluted earnings per share. Adding back the effect of dilutive securities would result in anti-dilution.

    (2)(4)
    Due to the net loss available to common shareholders in the first quarterquarters of 2008 and 2009, basic shares were used to calculate diluted earnings per share. Adding dilutive securities to the denominator would result in anti-dilution.

    8.     Trading Account Assets and Liabilities9.     TRADING ACCOUNT ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

            Trading account assets and liabilities, at fair value, consisted of the following at March 31, 20082009 and December 31, 2007:2008:

    In millions of dollars

     March 31,
    2008

     December 31,
    2007(1)

    In millions of dollars March 31,
    2009
     December 31,
    2008(1)
     
    Trading account assets    

    Trading account assets

     
    U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities $33,664 $32,180

    Trading mortgage-backed securities

    Trading mortgage-backed securities

     

    Agency guaranteed

     $24,479 $32,981 

    Prime

     2,355 1,416 

    Alt-A

     1,225 913 

    Subprime

     11,512 14,552 

    Non-U.S. residential

     399 2,447 

    Commercial

     2,501 2,501 
         

    Total Trading mortgage-backed securities

    Total Trading mortgage-backed securities

     $42,471 $54,810 
         

    U.S. Treasury and Federal Agencies

    U.S. Treasury and Federal Agencies

     

    U.S. Treasuries

     $8,530 $7,370 

    Agency and direct obligations

     5,653 4,017 
         

    Total U.S. Treasury and Federal Agencies

    Total U.S. Treasury and Federal Agencies

     $14,183 $11,387 
         
    State and municipal securities 18,005 18,574

    State and municipal securities

     6,614 9,510 
    Foreign government securities 68,748 52,332

    Foreign government securities

     62,213 57,422 
    Corporate and other debt securities 140,481 156,242

    Corporate

    Corporate

     55,076 54,654 
    Derivatives(2) 124,481 76,881

    Derivatives(2)

     95,860 115,289 
    Equity securities 90,373 106,868

    Equity securities

     33,987 48,503 
    Mortgage loans and collateralized mortgage securities 51,761 56,740
    Other 50,924 39,167

    Other debt securities

    Other debt securities

     $24,818 $26,060 
     
     
         
    Total trading account assets $578,437 $538,984

    Total trading account assets

     $335,222 $377,635 
     
     
         
    Trading account liabilities    

    Trading account liabilities

     
    Securities sold, not yet purchased $76,003 $78,541

    Securities sold, not yet purchased

     $49,688 $50,693 
    Derivatives(2) 125,983 103,541

    Derivatives(2)

     81,138 116,785 
     
     
         
    Total trading account liabilities $201,986 $182,082

    Total trading account liabilities

     $130,826 $167,478 
     
     
         

    (1)
    Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.

    (2)
    PursuantPresented net, pursuant to master netting agreements. See Note 16—Derivative Activities for a discussion regarding the accounting and reporting for derivatives.

    9.     Investments10.   INVESTMENTS

    In millions of dollars

     March 31, 2008
     December 31, 2007
    Securities available-for-sale $181,165 $193,113
    Non-marketable equity securities carried at fair value(1)  14,603  13,603
    Non-marketable equity securities carried at cost(2)  8,386  8,291
    Debt securities held-to-maturity(3)  1  1
      
     
    Total $204,155 $215,008
      
     
    In millions of dollars March 31,
    2009
     December 31,
    2008
     

    Securities available-for-sale

     $163,311 $175,189 

    Debt securities held-to-maturity(1)

      60,760  64,459 

    Non-marketable equity securities carried at fair value(2)

      7,595  9,262 

    Non-marketable equity securities carried at cost(3)

      7,140  7,110 
          

    Total investments

     $238,806 $256,020 
          

    (1)
    Recorded at amortized cost.

    (2)
    Unrealized gains and losses for non-marketable equity securities carried at fair value are recognized in earnings.

    (2)(3)
    Non-marketable equity securities carried at cost are periodically evaluated for other-than-temporary impairment.

    (3)
    Recorded at amortized cost.primarily consist of shares issued by the Federal Reserve Bank, Federal Home Loan Bank, foreign central banks and various clearing houses of which Citigroup is a member.

    Securities Available-for-Sale

            The amortized cost and fair value of securities available-for-sale at March 31, 20082009 and December 31, 20072008 were as follows:


     March 31, 2008
     December 31, 2007

     March 31, 2009 December 31, 2008(1) 
    In millions of dollars

     Amortized
    cost

     Gross
    unrealized
    gains

     Gross
    unrealized
    losses

     Fair value
     Amortized cost
     Fair value
    In millions of dollars Amortized
    cost
     Gross
    unrealized
    gains
     Gross
    unrealized
    losses
     Fair value Amortized
    cost
     Gross
    unrealized
    gains
     Gross
    unrealized
    losses
     Fair value 
    Securities available-for-sale            

    Debt securities available-for-sale:

    Debt securities available-for-sale:

     
    Mortgage-backed securities $62,017 $432 $4,086 $58,363 $63,888 $63,075

    Mortgage-backed securities

     
    U.S. Treasury and federal agencies 17,208 124 61 17,271 19,428 19,424

    U.S. government agency guaranteed

     $27,012 $462 $65 $27,409 $23,527 $261 $67 $23,721 

    Prime

     8,969 2 2,763 6,208 8,475 3 2,965 5,513 

    Alt-A

     413  16 397 54  9 45 

    Subprime

     36  24 12 38  21 17 

    Non-U.S. residential

     420  7 413 185 2  187 

    Commercial

     598 1 130 469 519  134 385 
                     

    Total mortgage-backed securities

    Total mortgage-backed securities

     $37,448 $465 $3,005 $34,908 $32,798 $266 $3,196 29,868 

    U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

    U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

     

    U.S. Treasury

     4,892 142  5,034 3,465 125  3,590 

    Agency obligations

     9,336 32 39 9,329 20,237 215 77 20,375 
                     

    Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

    Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

     $14,228 $174 $39 $14,363 $23,702 $340 $77 $23,965 
    State and municipal 13,604 81 946 12,739 13,342 13,206

    State and municipal

     17,520 161 3,649 14,032 18,156 38 4,370 13,824 
    Foreign government 69,889 570 474 69,985 72,339 72,075

    Foreign government

     65,773 843 489 66,127 79,505 945 408 80,042 
    U.S. corporate 11,770 48 588 11,230 13,250 12,850

    Corporate

    Corporate

     21,293 193 933 20,553 10,646 65 680 10,031 
    Other debt securities 7,683 87 112 7,658 8,734 8,717

    Other debt securities

     10,094 61 1,926 8,229 11,784 36 224 11,596 
     
     
     
     
     
     
                     
    Total debt securities available-for-sale $182,171 $1,342 $6,267 $177,246 $190,981 $189,347

    Total debt securities available- for-sale

    Total debt securities available- for-sale

     166,356 1,897 10,041 158,212 176,591 1,690 8,955 169,326 
     
     
     
     
     
     
                     
    Marketable equity securities available-for-sale $1,506 $2,431 $18 $3,919 $1,404 $3,766

    Marketable equity securities available-for-sale

     4,750 753 404 5,099 5,768 554 459 5,863 
     
     
     
     
     
     
                     
    Total securities available-for-sale $183,677 $3,773 $6,285 $181,165 $192,385 $193,113

    Total securities available-for-sale

     $171,106 $2,650 $10,445 $163,311 $182,359 $2,244 $9,414 $175,189 
     
     
     
     
     
     
                     

    (1)
    Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.

            The Company conducts and documents periodic reviews of all securities with unrealized losses to evaluate whether the impairment is other than temporary. As discussed in more detail below, prior to January 1, 2009, these reviews were conducted pursuant to FASB Staff Position No. 115-1,The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments (FSP FAS 115-1). Any unrealized loss identified as other than temporary was recorded directly in the Consolidated Statement of Income. As of January 1, 2009, the Company adopted FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2. Accordingly, any credit-related impairment related to debt securities the Company does not plan to sell and is more-likely-than-not not to be required to sell is recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income, with the non-credit-related impairment recognized in OCI. For other impaired debt securities, the entire impairment is recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income. See Note 1 for additional information.


            Citigroup invests in certain complex investment company structures known as Master-Feeder funds by making directThe table below shows the fair value of investments in available-for-sale securities that have been in an unrealized loss position for less than 12 months or for 12 months or longer as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008:

     
     March 31, 2009 
     
     Less than 12 months 12 months or longer Total 
    In millions of dollar Fair value Gross
    unrealized
    losses
     Fair value Gross
    unrealized
    losses
     Fair value Gross
    unrealized
    losses
     

    Securities available-for-sale

                       

    Mortgage-backed securities

                       
     

    U.S. government agency guaranteed

     $3,249 $3 $977 $62 $4,226 $65 
     

    Prime

      1,102  51  5,042  2,712  6,144  2,763 
     

    Alt-A

      354  7  41  9  395  16 
     

    Subprime

          9  24  9  24 
     

    Non-U.S. residential

        2  375  5  375  7 
     

    Commercial

      140  17  287  113  427  130 
                  

    Total mortgage-backed securities

      4,845  80  6,731  2,925  11,576  3,005 

    U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

                       
     

    U.S. Treasury

                 
     

    Agency obligations

      2,279  32  1  7  2,280  39 
                  

    Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

      2,279  32  1  7  2,280  39 

    State and municipal

      10,866  2,031  3,280  1,618  14,146  3,649 

    Foreign government

      12,871  244  2,752  245  15,623  489 

    Corporate

      1,536  227  8,446  706  9,982  933 

    Other debt securities

      5,646  1,705  514  221  6,160  1,926 

    Marketable equity securities available-for-sale

      3,268  330  97  74  3,365  404 
                  

    Total securities available-for-sale

     $41,311 $4,649 $21,821 $5,796 $63,132 $10,445 
                  


     
     December 31, 2008(1) 
     
     Less than 12 months 12 months or longer Total 
    In millions of dollar Fair value Gross
    unrealized
    losses
     Fair value Gross
    unrealized
    losses
     Fair value Gross
    unrealized
    losses
     

    Securities available-for-sale

                       

    Mortgage-backed securities

                       
     

    U.S. government agency guaranteed

     $5,281 $9 $432 $58 $5,713 $67 
     

    Prime

      2,258  1,127  3,108  1,838  5,366  2,965 
     

    Alt-A

      38  8  5  1  43  9 
     

    Subprime

          15  21  15  21 
     

    Non- U.S. residential

      10        10   
     

    Commercial

      213  33  233  101  446  134 
                  

    Total mortgage-backed securities

      7,800  1,177  3,793  2,019  11,593  3,196 

    U.S. Treasury and federal agencies

                       
     

    U.S. Treasury

                 
     

    Agency obligations

      1,654  76  1  1  1,655  77 
                  

    Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

      1,654  76  1  1  1,655  77 

    State and municipal

      12,827  3,872  3,762  498  16,589  4,370 

    Foreign government

      10,697  201  9,080  207  19,777  408 

    Corporate

      1,985  270  4,393  410  6,378  680 

    Other debt securities

      944  96  303  128  1,247  224 

    Marketable equity securities available-for-sale

      3,254  386  102  73  3,356  459 
                  

    Total securities available-for-sale

     $39,161 $6,078 $21,434 $3,336 $60,595 $9,414 
                  

    (1)
    Reclassified to conform to the Feeder funds. Each Feeder fund records its netcurrent period's presentation.

            The following table presents the amortized cost and fair value of debt securities available-for-sale by contractual maturity dates as of March 31, 2009, and December 31, 2008:

     
     March 31,2009 December 31, 2008(1) 
    In millions of dollars Amortized
    cost
     Fair
    value
     Amortized
    cost
     Fair
    value
     
    Mortgage-backed securities(2)             
    Due within 1 year $2 $4 $87 $80 
    After 1 but within 5 years  38  38  639  567 
    After 5 but within 10 years  882  889  1,362  1,141 
    After 10 years(3)  36,526  33,977  30,710  28,080 
              
    Total $37,448 $34,908 $32,798 $29,868 
              
    U.S. Treasury and federal agencies             
    Due within 1 year $3,295 $3,300 $15,736 $15,846 
    After 1 but within 5 years  4,160  4,177  5,755  5,907 
    After 5 but within 10 years  3,183  3,200  1,902  1,977 
    After 10 years(3)  3,590  3,686  309  235 
              
    Total $14,228 $14,363 $23,702 $23,965 
              
    State and municipal             
    Due within 1 year $219 $219 $214 $214 
    After 1 but within 5 years  85  88  84  84 
    After 5 but within 10 years  405  406  411  406 
    After 10 years(3)  16,811  13,319  17,447  13,120 
              
    Total $17,520 $14,032 $18,156 $13,824 
              
    Foreign government             
    Due within 1 year $23,345 $23,413 $26,481 $26,937 
    After 1 but within 5 years  34,698  35,179  45,652  45,462 
    After 5 but within 10 years  6,801  6,576  6,771  6,899 
    After 10 years(3)  929  959  601  744 
              
    Total $65,773 $66,127 $79,505 $80,042 
              
    All other(4)             
    Due within 1 year $4,908 $4,954 $4,160 $4,319 
    After 1 but within 5 years  15,409  15,075  2,662  2,692 
    After 5 but within 10 years  9,582  7,714  12,557  11,842 
    After 10 years(3)  1,488  1,039  3,051  2,774 
              
    Total $31,387 $28,782 $22,430 $21,627 
              
    Total debt securities available-for-sale $166,356 $158,212 $176,591 $169,326 
              

    (1)
    Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.

    (2)
    Includes mortgage-backed securities of U.S. federal agencies.

    (3)
    Investments with no stated maturities are included as contractual maturities of greater than 10 years. Actual maturities may differ due to call or prepayment rights.

    (4)
    Includes U.S. corporate, asset-backed securities issued by U.S. corporations, and other debt securities.

            The following table presents interest and dividends on investments for the first quarter ended March 31, 2009 and 2008:

    In millions of dollars Three months
    ended
    March 31,
    2009
     Three months
    ended
    March 31,
    2008
     
    Taxable interest $2,916 $2,389 
    Interest exempt from U.S. federal income tax  215  189 
    Dividends  45  109 
          
    Total interest and dividends $3,176 $2,687 
          

            The following table presents realized gains and losses on investments for the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. The gross realized investment losses exclude losses from other-than-temporary impairment:

    In millions of dollars Three months
    ended
    March 31,
    2009
     Three months
    ended
    March 31,
    2008
     
    Gross realized investment gains $781 $239 
    Gross realized investment losses  (24) (42)
          
    Net realized gains (losses) $757 $197 
          

    Debt Securities Held-to-Maturity

            The carrying value and fair value of securities held-to-maturity at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were as follows:

    In millions of dollars Amortized
    cost(1)
     Net unrealized
    loss on date of
    transfer
     Carrying
    value(2)
     Gross
    unrecognized
    gains
     Gross
    unrecognized
    losses
     Fair
    value
     
    March 31, 2009                   
    Debt securities held-to-maturity                   
    Mortgage-backed securities                   
     U.S. government agency guaranteed $ $ $ $ $ $ 
     Prime  7,128  1,332  5,796  4  1,430  4,370 
     Alt-A  16,296  4,390  11,906  20  3,131  8,795 
     Subprime  1,267  95  1,172  3  188  987 
     Non-U.S. residential  8,085  934  7,151    535  6,616 
     Commercial  1,507  69  1,438  33  304  1,167 
                  
     Total mortgage-backed securities  34,283  6,820  27,463  60  5,588  21,935 
    U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities                   
     U.S. Treasury  1    1      1 
     Agency and direct obligations             
                  
     Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities  1    1      1 
    State and municipal  3,161  16  3,145  2  119  3,028 
    Corporate  7,257  347  6,910  37  1,154  5,793 
    Asset-backed securities  20,871  373  20,498  130  717  19,911 
    Other debt securities  3,094  351  2,743  13  436  2,320 
                  
    Total debt securities held-to-maturity $68,667 $7,907 $60,760 $242 $8,014 $52,988 
                  
    December 31, 2008(3)                   
    Debt securities held-to-maturity                   
    Mortgage-backed securities                   
     U.S. government agency guaranteed $ $ $ $ $ $ 
     Prime  7,481  1,436  6,045    623  5,422 
     Alt-A  16,658  4,216  12,442  23  1,802  10,663 
     Subprime  1,368  125  1,243  15  163  1,095 
     Non-U.S. residential  10,496  1,128  9,368  5  397  8,976 
     Commercial  1,021    1,021    130  891 
                  
     Total mortgage-backed securities  37,024  6,905  30,119  43  3,115  27,047 
    U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities                   
     U.S. Treasury  1    1      1 
     Agency and direct obligations             
                  
     Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities  1    1      1 
    State and municipal  3,371  183  3,188  14  253  2,949 
    Corporate  6,906  175  6,731  130  305  6,556 
    Asset-backed securities  22,698  415  22,283  86  555  21,814 
    Other debt securities  2,478  341  2,137    127  2,010 
                  
    Total debt securities held-to-maturity $72,478 $8,019 $64,459 $273 $4,355 $60,377 
                  

    (1)
    For securities transferred to held-to-maturity fromTrading account assets, amortized cost is defined as the fair value amount of the securities at the date of transfer. For securities transferred to held-to-maturity from available-for-sale, amortized cost is defined as the original purchase cost, plus or minus any accretion or amortization of interest, less any impairment previously recognized in earnings.

    (2)
    Held-to-maturity securities are carried on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at amortized cost and the changes in the Master fund, whichvalue of these securities, other than impairment charges, are not reported on the financial statements.

    (3)
    Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.

            The net unrealized losses classified in accumulated other comprehensive income that relates to debt securities reclassified from available-for-sale investments to held-to-maturity investments was $7.9 billion as of March 31, 2009, compared to $8.0 billion as of December 31, 2008. This balance is amortized over the remaining life of the related securities as an adjustment of yield in a manner consistent with the accretion of discount on the same transferred debt securities. This will have no impact on the Company's net income, because the amortization of the unrealized holding loss reported in equity will offset the effect on interest income of the accretion of the discount on these securities.


            The table below shows the fair value of investments in held-to-maturity that have been in an unrealized loss position for less than 12 months or longer as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008:

     
     Less than 12 months 12 months or longer Total 
    In millions of dollars Fair
    value
     Gross
    unrealized
    losses
     Fair
    value
     Gross
    unrealized
    losses
     Fair
    value
     Gross
    unrealized
    losses
     
    March 31, 2009                   
    Debt securities held-to-maturity                   
    Mortgage-backed securities $2,186 $396 $18,938 $5,192 $21,124 $5,588 
    State and municipal  1,308  119      1,308  119 
    Corporate      5,735  1,154  5,735  1,154 
    Asset-backed securities  8,098  454  5,226  263  13,324  717 
    Other debt securities      2,319  436  2,319  436 
                  
    Total debt securities held-to-maturity $11,592 $969 $32,218 $7,045 $43,810 $8,014 
                  
    December 31, 2008(1)                   
    Debt securities held-to-maturity                   
    Mortgage-backed securities $2,348 $631 $24,236 $2,484 $26,584 $3,115 
    State and municipal  2,499  253      2,499  253 
    Corporate  23    4,107  305  4,130  305 
    Asset-backed securities  9,051  381  4,164  174  13,215  555 
    Other debt securities  439    5,246  127  5,685  127 
                  
    Total debt securities held-to-maturity $14,360 $1,265 $37,753 $3,090 $52,113 $4,355 
                  

    (1)
    Reclassified to conform to current period's presentation.

            Excluded from the gross unrealized losses presented in the above table is the sole$7.9 billion and $8.0 billion of gross unrealized losses recorded in AOCI related to the held-to-maturity securities that were reclassified from available-for-sale investments as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. Approximately $5.6 billion and $5.2 billion of these unrealized losses relate to securities that have been in a loss position for 12 months or principallonger at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively,

            The following table presents the carrying value and fair value of debt securities held-to-maturity by contractual maturity dates as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008:

    In millions of dollars Carrying
    value
     Fair
    value
     
    March 31, 2009:       
    Mortgage-backed securities       
    Due within 1 year $ $ 
    After 1 but within 5 years  103  103 
    After 5 but within 10 years     
    After 10 years(1)  27,360  21,832 
          
    Total $27,463 $21,935 
          
    State and municipal       
    Due within 1 year $6 $6 
    After 1 but within 5 years  76  76 
    After 5 but within 10 years  105  104 
    After 10 years(1)  2,958  2,842 
          
    Total $3,145 $3,028 
          
    All other(2)       
    Due within 1 year $7,261 $7,109 
    After 1 but within 5 years  7,428  7,217 
    After 5 but within 10 years  9,581  8,293 
    After 10 years(1)  5,882  5,406 
          
    Total $30,152 $28,025 
          
    Total debt securities held-to-maturity $60,760 $52,988 
          
    December 31, 2008(3):       
    Mortgage-backed securities       
    Due within 1 year $88 $65 
    After 1 but within 5 years  363  282 
    After 5 but within 10 years  513  413 
    After 10 years (1)  29,155  26,287 
          
    Total $30,119 $27,047 
          
    State and municipal       
    Due within 1 year $86 $86 
    After 1 but within 5 years  105  105 
    After 5 but within 10 years  112  106 
    After 10 years(1)  2,885  2,652 
          
    Total $3,188 $2,949 
          
    All other(2)       
    Due within 1 year $4,482 $4,505 
    After 1 but within 5 years  10,892  10,692 
    After 5 but within 10 years  6,358  6,241 
    After 10 years(1)  9,420  8,943 
          
    Total $31,152 $30,381 
          
    Total debt securities held-to-maturity $64,459 $60,377 
          

    (1)
    Investments with no stated maturities are included as contractual maturities of greater than 10 years. Actual maturities may differ due to call or prepayment rights.

    (2)
    Includes asset-backed securities and all other debt securities.

    (3)
    Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.

    Evaluating Investments for Other-than-Temporary Impairments

            The Company conducts periodic reviews to identify and evaluate each investment that has an unrealized loss, in accordance with FSP FAS 115-1 and FSP FAS 115-2. An unrealized loss exists when the current fair value of an individual security is less than its amortized cost basis. Unrealized losses that are determined to be temporary in nature are recorded, net of tax, inAccumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) for available-for-sale securities, while such losses related to held-to-maturity securities are not recorded, as these investments are carried at their amortized cost. For securities transferred to held-to-maturity fromTrading account assets, amortized cost is defined as the fair value amount of the Feeder fund,securities at the date of transfer plus any accretion income and less any impairment recognized in earnings subsequent to transfer. For securities transferred to held-to-maturity from available-for-sale, amortized cost is defined as the original purchase cost, plus or minus any accretion or amortization of a purchase discount or premium, less any impairment recognized in earnings subsequent to transfer.

            Regardless of the classification of the securities as available-for-sale or held-to-maturity, the Company has assessed each position for credit impairment.

            Factors considered in determining whether a loss is temporary include:

            The Company's review for impairment generally entails:

            For debt securities that are not deemed to be credit impaired, management performs additional analysis to assess whether it intends to sell or would more-likely-than-not not be required to sell the investment before the expected recovery of the amortized cost basis. In most cases, management has asserted that it has no intent to sell and that it believes it is more-likely-than-not that it will not be required to sell the investment before recovery of its amortized cost basis. Where such an assertion has not been made, the security's decline in fair value is deemed to be other than temporary and is recorded in earnings.

            Similarly, for equity securities, management considers the various factors described above, including its intent and ability to hold the equity security for a period of time sufficient for recovery to amortized cost. Where management lacks that intent or ability, the security's decline in fair value is deemed to be other than temporary and is recorded in earnings.

            For debt securities, a critical component of the evaluation for Other-than-temporary impairments is the identification of credit impaired securities, where management does not consolidateexpect to receive cash flows sufficient to recover the Master Fund. Citigroup consolidates Feeder fundsentire amortized cost basis of the security. The extent of the Company's analysis regarding credit quality and the stress on assumptions used in the analysis have been refined for securities where it has a controlling interest. Atthe current fair value or other characteristics of the security warrant. The paragraphs below describe the Company's process for identifying credit impairment in security types with the most significant unrealized losses as of March 31, 2008,2009.

    Mortgage-Backed Securities

            For U.S. mortgage-backed securities (and in particular for Alt-A and other mortgage-backed securities that have significant unrealized losses as a percentage of amortized cost), credit impairment is assessed using a cash flow model that estimates the cash flows on the underlying mortgages, using the security-specific collateral and transaction structure. The model estimates cash flows from the underlying mortgage loans and distributes those cash flows to various tranches of securities, considering the transaction structure and any subordination and credit enhancements that exist in that structure. The cash flow model incorporates actual cash flows on the mortgage-backed securities through the current period and then projects the remaining cash flows using a number of assumptions, including default rates, prepayment rates, and recovery rates (on foreclosed properties).

            Management develops specific assumptions using as much market data as possible and includes internal estimates as well as estimates published by rating agencies and other third-party sources. Default rates are projected by considering current underlying mortgage loan performance, generally assuming the default of a) 10% of current loans, b) 25% of 30-59 day delinquent loans, c) 75% of 60-90 day delinquent loans and d) 100% of 91+ day delinquent loans. These estimates are extrapolated along a default timing curve to estimate the total assetslifetime pool default rate. Other assumptions used contemplate the actual collateral attributes, including geographic concentrations, rating agency loss projections, rating actions and current market prices. The key base assumptions for mortgage-backed securities as of March 31, 2009 are in the table below:


    March 31, 2009

    Prepayment rate

    3-8 CRR

    Loss severity(1)

    45%-75%

    Unemployment rate

    9%

    Peak-to-trough housing price decline

    33%

    (1)
    Loss severity rates are estimated considering collateral characteristics and generally range from 45%-55% for prime bonds, 50%-60% for Alt-A bonds, and 65%-75% for sub-prime bonds.

            In addition, cash flow projections are developed using more stressful parameters, and management assesses the results of those stress tests (including the severity of any cash shortfall indicated and the likelihood of the stress scenario actually occurring based on the underlying pool's characteristics and performance) to assess whether management expects to recover the amortized cost basis of the security. If cash flow projections indicate that the Company does not expect to recover its amortized cost basis, the Company recognizes the estimated credit loss in earnings.

    State and Municipal Securities

    Citigroup's consolidated Feeder funds amounted to approximately $0.5 billion.available-for-sale state and municipal bonds consist primarily of bonds that are financed through Tender Option Bond programs. The process for identifying credit impairment for bonds in this program is largely based on third-party credit ratings. Individual bond positions must meet minimum ratings requirements, which vary based on the sector of the bond issuer. The average portfolio rating, ignoring any insurance, is Aa3/AA-. Citigroup monitors the bond issuer and insurer ratings on a daily basis. In the event of a downgrade of the bond below the Aa3/AA-, the subject bond is specifically reviewed for potential shortfall in contractual principal and interest. Citigroup has not consolidated approximately $3.2 billionrecorded any credit impairments on bonds held as part of additional assetsthe Tender Option Bond program. The remainder of Citigroup's available-for-sale state and liabilities recordedmunicipal bonds, outside of the Tender Option Bond Programs, are specifically reviewed for credit impairment based on instrument-specific estimates of cash flows, probability of default and loss given default.

    Recognition and Measurement of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment

            AFS and HTM debt securities that have been identified as other-than-temporarily impaired are written down to their current fair value. For debt securities that are intended to be sold, or that management believes it is more-likely-than-not that it will be required to be sold prior to recovery, the full impairment is recognized immediately in earnings.

            For AFS and HTM debt securities that management has no intent to sell and believes that it is more-likely-than not that it will not be required to be sold prior to recovery, only the related Master Funds' financial statements.credit loss component of the impairment is recognized in earnings, while the rest of the fair value loss is recognized in OCI. The credit loss component recognized in earnings is identified as the amount of principal cash flows not expected to be received over the remaining term of the security as projected using the Company's cash flow projections using its base assumptions.

            AFS equity securities deemed other-than-temporarily impaired are written down to fair value, with the full difference between fair value and amortized cost recognized in earnings.

            The following table presents the total other-than-temporary impairments recognized during the first quarter of 2009.

    Other-Than-Temporary Impairments on Investments

    In millions of dollars Available-for-
    Sale Securities
     Held-to-Maturity Securities Total 
    Impairment losses related to securities which the Company does not intend to sell or it is more-likely-than-not that it will not be required to sell:          
     Total OTTI losses recognized during the quarter ended March 31, 2009 $55 $1,285 $1,340 
     Less: portion of OTTI loss recognized in Other comprehensive income (before taxes)  14  617  631 
            
    Net impairment losses recognized in earnings for securities that the Company does not intend to sell or it is more likely-than-not that it will not be required to sell $41 $668 $709 
    OTTI losses recognized in earnings for securities that the Company intends to sell or more-likely-than-not will be required to sell before recovery  39    39 
            
    Total impairment losses recognized in earnings $80 $668 $748 
            

            The first quarter of 2009 roll forward of the credit-related position recognized in earnings for all securities still held as of March 31, 2009 is as follows:

     
     Cumulative Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Credit Losses Recognized in Earnings
    for Available-for-Sale Securities
     
    In millions of dollars January 1, 2009
    Cumulative OTTI
    credit losses recognized
    for securities still held
     Additions for OTTI
    securities where no credit
    losses were recognized
    prior to
    January 1, 2009
     Additions for OTTI
    securities where credit
    losses have been
    recognized prior to
    January 1, 2009
     Reductions due to
    sales of credit
    impaired securities
     March 31, 2009
    Cumulative OTTI credit
    losses recognized for
    securities still held
     
    OTTI credit losses recognized for available-for-sale debt securities                
    Mortgage-backed securities                
     Commercial real estate $1 $1     $2 
    Corporate  53  22  10  (1) 84 
    Asset backed securities    2      2 
    Other debt securities    6      6 
                
    Total OTTI credit losses recognized for available-for-sale debt securities $54 $31 $10 $(1)$94 
                


     
     Cumulative Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Credit Losses Recognized in Earnings
    For Held-to-Maturity Securities
     
    In millions of dollars January 1, 2009
    Cumulative OTTI
    credit losses recognized
    for securities still held
     Additions for OTTI
    securities where no credit
    losses were recognized
    prior to
    January 1, 2009
     Additions for OTTI
    securities where credit
    losses have been
    recognized prior to
    January 1, 2009
     March 31, 2009
    Cumulative OTTI credit
    losses recognized for
    securities still held
     
    OTTI credit losses recognized for held-to-maturity debt securities             
    Mortgage-backed securities             
     Prime $8     $8 
     Alt-A  1,091  395  19  1,505 
     Subprime  85  10    95 
     Non- U.S. residential  28  6    34 
     Commercial real estate  4  0    4 
    Corporate    221    221 
    Asset backed securities  17  15    32 
    Other debt securities    2    2 
              
    Total OTTI credit losses recognized for held-to-maturity debt securities $1,233 $649 $19 $1,901 
              

    10.   Goodwill and Intangible Assets11.   GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

    Goodwill

            The changes in goodwill during the first three months of 20082009 were as follows:

    In millions of dollars

     Goodwill
    Balance at December 31, 2007 $41,204
    Purchase of the remaining shares of Nikko Cordial  1,492
    Purchase accounting adjustment—BOOC acquisition  100
    Acquisition of the U.S. branches of Banco de Chile  88
    Purchase accounting adjustment—Bisys acquisition  68
    Foreign exchange translation and other  670
      
    Balance at March 31, 2008 $43,622
      
    In millions of dollars Goodwill 

    Balance at December 31, 2008

     $27,132 

    Foreign exchange translation

      (844)

    Purchase accounting adjustments and other

      122 
        

    Balance at March 31, 2009

     $26,410 
        

            During the first quarter of 2008,2009, no goodwill was written off due to impairment.

    Intangible Assets

            The components of intangible assets were as follows:


     March 31, 2008
     December 31, 2007
     March 31, 2009 December 31, 2008 
    In millions of dollars

     Gross
    carrying
    amount

     Accumulated
    amortization

     Net
    carrying
    amount

     Gross
    carrying
    amount

     Accumulated
    amortization

     Net
    carrying
    amount

     Gross
    carrying
    amount
     Accumulated
    amortization
     Net
    carrying
    amount
     Gross
    carrying
    amount
     Accumulated
    amortization
     Net
    carrying
    amount
     
    Purchased credit card relationships $8,846 $4,287 $4,559 $8,499 $4,045 $4,454 $8,334 $4,560 $3,774 $8,443 $4,513 $3,930 
    Core deposit intangibles 1,570 687 883 1,435 518 917 1,314 671 643 1,345 662 683 
    Other customer relationships 4,328 207 4,121 2,746 197 2,549 3,662 168 3,494 4,031 168 3,863 
    Present value of future profits 429 261 168 427 257 170 414 267 147 415 264 151 
    Other(1) 5,422 1,228 4,194 5,783 1,157 4,626 5,512 1,349 4,163 5,343 1,285 4,058 
     
     
     
     
     
     
                 
    Total amortizing intangible assets $20,595 $6,670 $13,925 $18,890 $6,174 $12,716 $19,236 $7,015 $12,221 $19,577 $6,892 $12,685 
    Indefinite-lived intangible assets 2,304 N/A 2,304 1,591 N/A 1,591 1,391 N/A 1,391 1,474 N/A 1,474 
    Mortgage servicing rights 7,716 N/A 7,716 8,380 N/A 8,380 5,481 N/A 5,481 5,657 N/A 5,657 
     
     
     
     
     
     
                 
    Total intangible assets $30,615 $6,670 $23,945 $28,861 $6,174 $22,687 $26,108 $7,015 $19,093 $26,708 $6,892 $19,816 
     
     
     
     
     
     
                 

    (1)
    Includes contract-related intangible assets.

    N/A

    Not Applicable.

            The changes in intangible assets during the first three monthsquarter of 20082009 were as follows:

    In millions of dollars

     Net carrying
    amount at
    December 31,
    2007

     Acquisitions
     Amortization
     Impairments(1)
     FX and
    other(2)

     Net carrying
    amount at
    March 31,
    2008

     Net carrying
    amount at
    December 31,
    2008
     Acquisitions Amortization Impairments FX and
    other(1)
     Net carrying
    amount at
    March 31,
    2009
     
    Purchased credit card relationships $4,454 $85 $(165)$ $185 $4,559 $3,930 $ $(145)$ $(11)$3,774 
    Core deposit intangibles 917  (39)  5 883 683  (29)  (11) 643 
    Other customer relationships 2,549 1,355 (57)  274 4,121 3,863  (79)  (290) 3,494 
    Present value of future profits 170  (3)  1 168 151  (3)  (1) 147 
    Indefinite-lived intangible assets 1,591 550   163 2,304 1,474    (83) 1,391 
    Other 4,626 78 (82) (202) (226) 4,194

    Other(3)

     4,058 220 (75)  (40) 4,163 
     
     
     
     
     
     
                 
     $14,307 $2,068 $(346)$(202)$402 $16,229 $14,159 $220 $(331)$ $(436)$13,612 
     
     
     
     
     
     
                 
    Mortgage servicing rights(3) 8,380         7,716

    Mortgage servicing rights(2)

     5,657         5,481 
     
             
           
    Total intangible assets $22,687         $23,945 $19,816         $19,093 
     
     
     
     
     
     
           

    (1)
    During the first quarter of 2008, Old Lane notified investors in its multi-strategy hedge fund that they would have the opportunity to redeem their investments in the fund, without restriction, effective July 31, 2008. In April 2008, substantially all unaffiliated investors had notified Old Lane of their intention to redeem their investments. Based on the Company's expectation of the level of redemptions in the fund, the Company expects that the cash flows from the hedge fund management contract will be lower than previously estimated. The Company performed an impairment analysis of the intangible asset relating to the hedge fund management contract. As a result, an impairment loss of $202 million, representing the remaining unamortized balance of the intangible assets, was recorded in operating expenses in the results of the Alternative Investments segment. The fair value was estimated using a discounted cash flow approach.

    (2)
    Includes foreign exchange translation and purchase accounting adjustments.

    (3)(2)
    See page 82Note 15 for the roll-forward of mortgage servicing rights.

    (3)
    During the 2009 first quarter, Citigroup paid $220 million to extend and modify certain contractual rights. The intangible asset related to those contractual rights is amortized over a 16-year period. The contract is up for renewal in 9 years.

    11.   Debt
    12.    DEBT

    Short-Term Borrowings

            Short-term borrowings consist of commercial paper and other borrowings as follows:

    In millions of dollars

     March 31, 2008
     December 31, 2007
    Commercial paper      
    Citigroup Funding Inc.  $37,331 $34,939
    Other Citigroup Subsidiaries  2,016  2,404
      
     
      $39,347 $37,343
    Other short-term borrowings  96,452  109,145
      
     
    Total short-term borrowings $135,799 $146,488
      
     

    In millions of dollars March 31,
    2009
     December 31,
    2008
     

    Commercial paper

           

    Citigroup Funding Inc. 

     $29,141 $28,654 

    Other Citigroup Subsidiaries

      107  471 
          

     $29,248 $29,125 

    Other short-term borrowings

      87,141  97,566 
          

    Total short-term borrowings

     $116,389 $126,691 
          

            Borrowings under bank lines of credit may be at interest rates based on LIBOR, CD rates, the prime rate, or bids submitted by the banks. Citigroup pays commitment fees for its lines of credit.

            Some of Citigroup's nonbank subsidiaries have credit facilities with Citigroup's subsidiary depository institutions, including Citibank, N.A. Borrowings under these facilities must be secured in accordance with Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act.

            CGMHI has committed financing with unaffiliated banks. At March 31, 2009, CGMHI had drawn down the full $1.175 billion available under these facilities, of which $725 million is guaranteed by Citigroup. CGMHI has bilateral facilities totaling $575 million with unaffiliated banks with maturities occurring on various dates in the second half of 2009 and early 2010. They also have substantial borrowing agreements consisting of facilities that CGMHI has been advised are available, but where no contractual lending obligation exists. These arrangements are reviewed on an ongoing basis to ensure flexibility in meeting CGMHI's short-term requirements.

    Long-Term Debt

    In millions of dollars at year end

     March 31,
    2008

     December 31,
    2007

    In millions of dollars March 31,
    2009
     December 31,
    2008
     
    Citigroup Parent Company $181,109 $171,637 $188,826 $192,281 
    Other Citigroup Subsidiaries(1) 180,876 187,657 92,592 109,314 
    Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc.(2) 25,095 31,401
    Citigroup Funding Inc.(3)(4) 37,879 36,417
    Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc.  15,311 20,623 
    Citigroup Funding Inc.(2) 40,523 37,375 
     
     
         
    Total long term debt $424,959 $427,112 $337,252 $359,593 
     
     
         

    (1)
    At March 31, 20082009 and December 31, 2007,2008, collateralized advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank are $85.9$53.2 billion and $86.9$67.4 billion, respectively.

    (2)
    Includes Targeted Growth Enhanced Term Securities (TARGETS) with no carrying value at March 31, 2008 and $48 million issued by TARGETS Trust XXIV at December 31, 2007 (the "CGMHI Trust"). CGMHI owns all of the voting securities of the CGMHI Trust. The CGMHI Trust has no assets, operations, revenues or cash flows other than those related to the issuance, administration, and repayment of the TARGETS and the CGMHI Trust's common securities. The CGMHI Trust's obligations under the TARGETS are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by CGMHI, and CGMHI's guarantee obligations are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Citigroup.

    (3)
    Includes Targeted Growth Enhanced Term Securities (CFI TARGETS) with carrying values of $54 million and $55 million issued by TARGETS Trusts XXV and XXVI at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, (collectively, the "CFI Trusts"). CFI owns all of the voting securities of the CFI Trusts. The CFI Trusts have no assets, operations, revenues or cash flows other than those related to the issuance, administration, and repayment of the CFI TARGETS and the CFI Trusts' common securities. The CFI Trusts' obligations under the CFI TARGETS are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by CFI, and CFI's guarantee obligations are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Citigroup.

    (4)
    Includes Principal-Protected Trust Securities (Safety First Trust Securities) with carrying values of $312$468 million issued by Safety First Trust Series 2006-1, 2007-1, 2007-2, 2007-3, 2007-4, 2008-1, 2008-2, 2008-3, 2008-4, 2008-5, 2008-6, and 2008-12009-1 at March 31, 20082009 and $301$452 million issued by Safety First Trust Series 2006-1, 2007-1, 2007-2, 2007-3, 2007-4, 2008-1, 2008-2, 2008-3, 2008-4, 2008-5 and 2007-42008-6 (collectively, the "Safety First Trusts") at December 31, 2007.2008. CFI owns all of the voting securities of the Safety First Trusts. The Safety First Trusts have no assets, operations, revenues or cash flows other than those related to the issuance, administration, and repayment of the Safety First Trust Securities and the Safety First Trusts' common securities. The Safety First Trusts' obligations under the Safety First Trust Securities are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by CFI, and CFI's guarantee obligations are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Citigroup.

            CGMHI has a syndicated five-year committed uncollateralized revolving line of credit facility with unaffiliated banks totaling $3.0 billion, which matures in 2011. CGMHI also has three-year and one-year bilateral facilities totaling $1.375 billion with unaffiliated banks with borrowings maturing on various dates in 2008 and 2009. At March 31, 2008, $800 million of the bilateral facilities were drawn.

            CGMHI also has committed long-term financing facilities with unaffiliated banks. At March 31, 2008,2009, CGMHI had drawn down the full $2.075 billion$900 million available under these facilities, of which $1.08 billion$350 million is guaranteed by Citigroup. A bank can terminate these facilities by giving CGMHI prior notice (generally one year).

            CGMHI also has substantial borrowing arrangements consisting of facilities that CGMHI has been advised are available, but where no contractual lending obligation exists. These arrangements are reviewed on an ongoing basis to ensure flexibility in meeting CGMHI's short-term requirements.

            The Company issues both fixed and variable rate debt in a range of currencies. It uses derivative contracts, primarily interest rate swaps, to effectively convert a portion of its fixed rate debt to variable rate debt and variable rate debt to fixed rate debt. The maturity structure of the derivatives generally corresponds to the maturity structure of the debt being hedged. In addition, the Company uses other derivative contracts to manage the foreign exchange impact of certain debt issuances.

            Long-term debt at March 31, 20082009 and December 31, 20072008 includes $24.1$24.7 billion and $23.8$24.1 billion, respectively, of junior subordinated debt. The Company formed statutory business trusts under the laws of the state of Delaware. The trusts exist for the exclusive purposes of (i) issuing Trust Securitiestrust securities representing undivided beneficial interests in the assets of the Trust;trust; (ii) investing the gross proceeds of the Trusttrust securities in junior subordinated deferrable interest


    debentures (subordinated debentures) of its parent; and (iii) engaging in only those activities necessary or incidental thereto. Upon approval from the Federal Reserve, Citigroup has the right to redeem these securities.

            Citigroup has contractually agreed not to redeem or purchase (i) the 6.50% Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities of Citigroup Capital XV before September 15, 2056, (ii) the 6.45% Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities of Citigroup Capital XVI before December 31, 2046, (iii) the 6.35%


    Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities of Citigroup Capital XVII before March 15, 2057, (iv) the 6.829% Fixed Rate/Floating Rate Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities of Citigroup Capital XVIII before June 28, 2047, (v) the 7.250% Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities of Citigroup Capital XIX before August 15, 2047, (vi) the 7.875% Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities of Citigroup Capital XX before December 15, 2067, and (vii) the 8.300% Fixed Rate/Floating Rate Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities of Citigroup Capital XXI before December 21, 2067 unless certain conditions, described in Exhibit 4.03 to Citigroup's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 18, 2006, in Exhibit 4.02 to Citigroup's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 28, 2006, in Exhibit 4.02 to Citigroup's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 8, 2007, in Exhibit 4.02 to Citigroup's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 2, 2007, in Exhibit 4.02 to Citigroup's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 17, 2007, in Exhibit 4.2 to Citigroup's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 27, 2007, and in Exhibit 4.2 to Citigroup's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 21, 2007, respectively, are met. These agreements are for the benefit of the holders of Citigroup's 6.00% Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures due 2034.

            Citigroup owns all of the voting securities of these subsidiary trusts. These subsidiary trusts have no assets, operations, revenues or cash flows other than those related to the issuance, administration, and repayment of the subsidiary trusts and the subsidiary trusts' common securities. These subsidiary trusts' obligations are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Citigroup.


            The following table summarizes the financial structure of each of the Company's subsidiary trusts at March 31, 2008:2009:

    Trust securities
    with distributions
    guaranteed by
    Citigroup

      
      
      
      
      
     Junior subordinated debentures owned by trust
     
      
      
      
     Common
    shares
    issued
    to parent

    Issuance
    date

     Securities
    issued

     Liquidation
    value

     Coupon
    rate

     Amount(1)
     Maturity
     Redeemable
    by issuer
    beginning

    In millions of dollars, except share amounts                  

      
      
      
      
      
     Junior subordinated debentures
    owned by trust
     
    Trust securities with distributions
    guaranteed by Citigroup
    In millions of dollars, except share amounts
     Issuance
    date
     Securities
    issued
     Liquidation
    value
     Coupon
    rate
     Common
    shares issued
    to parent
     Amount(1) Maturity Redeemable
    by issuer
    beginning
     
    Citigroup Capital III Dec. 1996 200,000 $200 7.625%6,186 $206 Dec. 1, 2036 Not redeemable Dec. 1996 200,000 $200 7.625% 6,186 $206 Dec. 1, 2036 Not redeemable 
    Citigroup Capital VII July 2001 46,000,000  1,150 7.125%1,422,681  1,186 July 31, 2031 July 31, 2006 July 2001 46,000,000 1,150 7.125% 1,422,681 1,186 July 31, 2031 July 31, 2006 
    Citigroup Capital VIII Sept. 2001 56,000,000  1,400 6.950%1,731,959  1,443 Sept. 15, 2031 Sept. 17, 2006 Sept. 2001 56,000,000 1,400 6.950% 1,731,959 1,443 Sept. 15, 2031 Sept. 17, 2006 
    Citigroup Capital IX Feb. 2003 44,000,000  1,100 6.000%1,360,825  1,134 Feb. 14, 2033 Feb. 13, 2008 Feb. 2003 44,000,000 1,100 6.000% 1,360,825 1,134 Feb. 14, 2033 Feb. 13, 2008 
    Citigroup Capital X Sept. 2003 20,000,000  500 6.100%618,557  515 Sept. 30, 2033 Sept. 30, 2008 Sept. 2003 20,000,000 500 6.100% 618,557 515 Sept. 30, 2033 Sept. 30, 2008 
    Citigroup Capital XI Sept. 2004 24,000,000  600 6.000%742,269  619 Sept. 27, 2034 Sept. 27, 2009 Sept. 2004 24,000,000 600 6.000% 742,269 619 Sept. 27, 2034 Sept. 27, 2009 
    Citigroup Capital XIV June 2006 22,600,000  565 6.875%40,000  566 June 30, 2066 June 30, 2011 June 2006 22,600,000 565 6.875% 40,000 566 June 30, 2066 June 30, 2011 
    Citigroup Capital XV Sept. 2006 47,400,000  1,185 6.500%40,000  1,186 Sept. 15, 2066 Sept. 15, 2011 Sept. 2006 47,400,000 1,185 6.500% 40,000 1,186 Sept. 15, 2066 Sept. 15, 2011 
    Citigroup Capital XVI Nov. 2006 64,000,000  1,600 6.450%20,000  1,601 Dec. 31, 2066 Dec. 31, 2011 Nov. 2006 64,000,000 1,600 6.450% 20,000 1,601 Dec. 31, 2066 Dec. 31, 2011 
    Citigroup Capital XVII Mar. 2007 44,000,000  1,100 6.350%20,000  1,101 Mar. 15, 2067 Mar. 15, 2012 Mar. 2007 44,000,000 1,100 6.350% 20,000 1,101 Mar. 15, 2067 Mar. 15, 2012 
    Citigroup Capital XVIII June 2007 500,000  994 6.829%50  994 June 28, 2067 June 28, 2017 June 2007 500,000 717 6.829% 50 717 June 28, 2067 June 28, 2017 
    Citigroup Capital XIX Aug. 2007 49,000,000  1,225 7.250%20  1,226 Aug. 15, 2067 Aug. 15, 2012 Aug. 2007 49,000,000 1,225 7.250% 20 1,226 Aug. 15, 2067 Aug. 15, 2012 
    Citigroup Capital XX Nov. 2007 31,500,000  788 7.875%20,000  788 Dec. 15, 2067 Dec. 15, 2012 Nov. 2007 31,500,000 788 7.875% 20,000 788 Dec. 15, 2067 Dec. 15, 2012 
    Citigroup Capital XXI Dec. 2007 3,500,000  3,500 8.300%500  3,501 Dec. 21, 2077 Dec. 21, 2037 Dec. 2007 3,500,000 3,500 8.300% 500 3,501 Dec. 21, 2077 Dec. 21, 2037 
    Citigroup Capital XXIX Nov. 2007 1,875,000  1,875 6.320%10  1,875 Mar. 15, 2041 Mar. 15, 2013 Nov. 2007 1,875,000 1,875 6.320% 10 1,875 Mar. 15, 2041 Mar. 15, 2013 
    Citigroup Capital XXX Nov. 2007 1,875,000  1,875 6.455%10  1,875 Sept. 15, 2041 Sept. 15, 2013 Nov. 2007 1,875,000 1,875 6.455% 10 1,875 Sept. 15, 2041 Sept. 15, 2013 
    Citigroup Capital XXXI Nov. 2007 1,875,000  1,875 6.700%10  1,875 Mar. 15, 2042 Mar. 15, 2014 Nov. 2007 1,875,000 1,875 6.700% 10 1,875 Mar. 15, 2042 Mar. 15, 2014 
    Citigroup Capital XXXII Nov. 2007 1,875,000  1,875 6.935%10  1,875 Sept. 15, 2042 Sept. 15, 2014 Nov. 2007 1,875,000 1,875 6.935% 10 1,875 Sept. 15, 2042 Sept. 15, 2014 
    Adam Capital Trust III Dec. 2002 17,500  18 3 mo. LIB +335 bp. 542  18 Jan. 07, 2033 Jan. 07, 2008 Dec. 2002 17,500 18 3 mo. LIB
    +335 bp.
     542 18 Jan. 07, 2033 Jan. 07, 2008 
    Adam Statutory Trust III Dec. 2002 25,000  25 3 mo. LIB +325 bp. 774  26 Dec. 26, 2032 Dec. 26, 2007 Dec. 2002 25,000 25 3 mo. LIB
    +325 bp.
     774 26 Dec. 26, 2032 Dec. 26, 2007 
    Adam Statutory Trust IV Sept. 2003 40,000  40 3 mo. LIB +295 bp. 1,238  41 Sept. 17, 2033 Sept. 17, 2008 Sept. 2003 40,000 40 3 mo. LIB
    +295 bp.
     1,238 41 Sept. 17, 2033 Sept. 17, 2008 
    Adam Statutory Trust V Mar. 2004 35,000  35 3 mo. LIB +279 bp. 1,083  36 Mar. 17, 2034 Mar. 17, 2009 Mar. 2004 35,000 35 3 mo. LIB
    +279 bp.
     1,083 36 Mar. 17, 2034 Mar. 17, 2009 
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
             
    Total obligated     $23,525     $23,687         $23,248     $23,410     
         
         
                 

    (1)
    Represents the proceeds received from the Trusttrust at the date of issuance.

            In each case, the coupon rate on the debentures is the same as that on the trust securities. Distributions on the trust securities and interest on the debentures are payable quarterly, except for Citigroup Capital III, Citigroup Capital XVIII and Citigroup Capital XXI on which distributions are payable semiannually.

            During 2007,the first quarter of 2009, Citigroup issued $1.1 billion, $0.9 billion, $1.225 billion, $788 million, $3.5 billion and $7.5 billion related to thedid not issue any Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities of Citigroup Capital XVII, XVIII, XIX, XX, XXI, and XXIX-XXXII (ADIA) respectively.Securities.


    12.   Preferred Stock13.   PREFERRED STOCK

            The following table summarizes the Company's Preferredpreferred stock outstanding at March 31, 20082009 and December 31, 2007:2008:

     
      
      
      
      
     Carrying Value
    (in millions of dollars)
     
      
      
      
     Approximately
    convertible to
    Citigroup common
    shares

     
     Dividend Rate
     Redemption
    price per
    depositary share

     Number
    of depositary shares

     March 31,
    2008

     December 31,
    2007

    Series T(1) 6.500%$50 63,373,000 93,944,135 $3,169 $
    Series A(2) 7.000%$50 137,600,000 217,573,120  6,880  
    Series B(2) 7.000%$50 60,000,000 94,872,000  3,000  
    Series C(2) 7.000%$50 20,000,000 31,624,000  1,000  
    Series D(2) 7.000%$50 15,000,000 23,718,000  750  
    Series J(2) 7.000%$50 9,000,000 14,230,800  450  
    Series K(2) 7.000%$50 8,000,000 12,649,600  400  
    Series L1(2) 7.000%$50 100,000 158,120  5  
    Series N(2) 7.000%$50 300,000 474,360  15  
    Series AA(3) 8.125%$25 148,600,000   3,715  
      
     
     
     
     
     
             489,244,135 $19,384 $
             
     
       
     
      
      
      
      
     Carrying value
    (in millions of dollars)
     
     
      
      
      
     Convertible to
    approximate
    number of
    Citigroup common
    shares
     
     
      
     Redemption
    price per
    depositary share /
    preference share
      
     
     
     Dividend rate Number
    of depositary shares
     March 31,
    2009
     December 31,
    2008
     
    Series A1(1)  7.000%$50  137,600,000  261,083,726 $6,880 $6,880 
    Series B1(1)  7.000% 50  60,000,000  113,844,648  3,000  3,000 
    Series C1(1)  7.000% 50  20,000,000  37,948,216  1,000  1,000 
    Series D1(1)  7.000% 50  15,000,000  28,461,162  750  750 
    Series E(2)  8.400% 1,000  6,000,000    6,000  6,000 
    Series F(3)  8.500% 25  81,600,000    2,040  2,040 
    Series G(4)  8.000% 1,000,000  7,059    3,529   
    Series H(5)  5.000% 1,000,000  25,000    23,780  23,727 
    Series I(6)  8.000% 1,000,000  20,000    19,513  19,513 
    Series J1(1)  7.000% 50  9,000,000  17,076,698  450  450 
    Series K1(1)  7.000% 50  8,000,000  15,179,287  400  400 
    Series L2(1)  7.000% 50  100,000  189,742  5  5 
    Series N1(1)  7.000% 50  300,000  569,224  15  15 
    Series T(7)  6.500% 50  63,373,000  93,940,986  3,169  3,169 
    Series AA(8)  8.125% 25  148,600,000    3,715  3,715 
                  
                568,293,689 $74,246 $70,664 
                     

    (1)
    Issued on January 23, 2008 as depositary shares, each representing a 1/1,000th interest in a share of the corresponding series of Non-Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock. Redeemable in whole or in part on or after February 15, 2015. Under the terms of pre-existing conversion price reset agreements with holders of Series A, B, C, D, J, K, L1 and N (the "Old Preferred Stock"), on February 17, 2009, Citigroup exchanged shares of new preferred stock (the "New Preferred Stock") for an equal number of shares of Old Preferred Stock. The terms and conditions of the New Preferred Stock are identical in all material respects to the terms and conditions of the Old Preferred Stock, except that the Conversion Price and Conversion Rate of the New Preferred Stock have been reset to $26.3517 and 1,897.4108, respectively. All shares of the Old Preferred Stock were canceled. The dividend of $0.88 per depositary share is payable quarterly when, as and if declared by the Company's Board of Directors. Redemption is subject to a capital replacement covenant.

    (2)
    Issued on April 28, 2008 as depositary shares, each representing a 1/25th interest in a share of the corresponding series of Fixed Rate/Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock. Redeemable in whole or in part on or after April 30, 2018. Dividends are payable semi-annually for the first 10 years until April 30, 2018 at $42.00 per depositary share and thereafter quarterly at a floating rate when, as and if declared by the Company's Board of Directors.

    (3)
    Issued on May 13, 2008 and May 28, 2008 as depositary shares, each representing a 1/1,000th interest in a share of the corresponding series of Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock. Redeemable in whole or in part on or after June 15, 2013. The dividend of $0.53 per depositary share is payable quarterly when, as and if declared by the Company's Board of Directors.

    (4)
    Issued on January 15, 2009 as shares of Cumulative Preferred Stock to the United States Treasury and the FDIC under the Troubled Asset Relief Program as fee for guaranteeing $300.8 billion of ring fenced assets. Redeemable in whole or in part subject to approval of the investor and compliance with certain conditions. The dividend of $20,000 per preferred share is payable quarterly when, as and if declared by the Company's Board of Directors.

    (5)
    Issued on October 28, 2008 as shares of Cumulative Preferred Stock to the United States Treasury under the Troubled Asset Relief Program. Redeemable in whole or in part subject to approval of the investor and compliance with certain conditions. Dividends are payable quarterly for the first five years until February 15, 2013 at $12,500 per preferred share and thereafter at $22,500 per preferred share when, as and if declared by the Company's Board of Directors.

    (6)
    Issued on December 31, 2008 as shares of Cumulative Preferred Stock to the United States Treasury under the Troubled Asset Relief Program. Redeemable in whole or in part subject to approval of the investor and compliance with certain conditions. The dividend of $20,000 per preferred share is payable quarterly when, as and if declared by the Company's Board of Directors.

    (7)
    Issued on January 23, 2008 and January 29, 2008 as depositary shares, each representing a 1/1000th1,000th interest in a share of the corresponding series of Non-Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock. Redeemable in whole or in part on or after February 15, 2015. Convertible into Citigroup common stock at a conversion rate of approximately 1.48241,482.3503 per depositary share, which is subject to adjustment under certain conditions. The dividend of $0.81 per depositary share is payable quarterly when, as and if declared by the Company's Board of Directors. Redemption is subject to a capital replacement covenant.

    (2)(8)
    Issued on January 23, 2008 as depositary shares, each representing a 1/1000th interest in a share of the corresponding series of Non-Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock. Redeemable in whole or in part on or after February 15, 2015. Convertible into Citigroup common stock at a conversion rate of approximately 1.5812 per depositary share, which is subject to adjustment under certain conditions. The dividend of $0.88 per depositary share is payable quarterly when, as and if declared by the Company's Board of Directors. Redemption is subject to a capital replacement covenant.

    (3)
    Issued on January 25, 2008 as depositary shares, each representing a 1/1000tth1,000th interest in a share of the corresponding series of Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock. Redeemable in whole or in part on or after February 15, 2018. The dividend of $0.51 per depositary share is payable quarterly when, as and if declared by the Company's Board of Directors. Redemption is subject to a capital replacement covenant.

            On April 28, 2008,If dividends are declared on Series E as scheduled, the Company issued an additional $6 billion of 8.40% fixed rate/floating rate non-cumulativeimpact from preferred dividends on earnings per share in the first and third quarters will be lower than the impact in the second and fourth quarters. All other series currently have a quarterly dividend declaration schedule. As previously announced, in connection with the proposed exchange offer, Citigroup intends to pay full dividends on the preferred stock known as Series E, in athrough and until the closing of the public offering. Dividends will be paid semi-annually onexchange offers, at which point the Series E at a fixed rate for the first 10 years, until April 30, 2018, after which dividends will be paid quarterly at a floating rate so long as the Series E preferred stock remains outstanding.suspended.


    13.   Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)14.   CHANGES IN ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

            Changes in each component of "AccumulatedAccumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)" for the three-month period ended March 31, 20082009 were as follows:

    In millions of dollars

     Net unrealized
    gains (losses)
    on
    investment
    securities

     Foreign
    currency
    translation
    adjustment

     Cash flow
    hedges

     Pension
    liability
    adjustments

     Accumulated other
    comprehensive
    income (loss)

     
    Balance, December 31, 2007 $471 $(772)$(3,163)$(1,196)$(4,660)
    Decrease (increase) in net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities, net of taxes(1)  (2,345)       (2,345)
    Less: Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income, net of taxes  (42)       (42)
    Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes(2)    1,273      1,273 
    Cash flow hedges, net of taxes(3)      (1,638)   (1,638)
    Pension liability adjustment, net of taxes        31  31 
      
     
     
     
     
     
    Change $(2,387)$1,273 $(1,638)$31 $(2,721)
      
     
     
     
     
     
    Balance, March 31, 2008 $(1,916)$501 $(4,801)$(1,165)$(7,381)
      
     
     
     
     
     
    In millions of dollars Net unrealized
    gains (losses) on
    investment
    securities
     Foreign
    currency
    translation
    adjustment,
    net of hedges
     Cash flow
    hedges
     Pension
    liability
    adjustments
     Accumulated other
    comprehensive
    income (loss)
     
    Balance, December 31, 2008 $(9,647)$(7,744)$(5,189)$(2,615)$(25,195)
    Cumulative effect of accounting change (FSP FAS 115-2)  (413)       (413)
                
    Balance, January 1, 2009 $(10,060)$(7,744)$(5,189)$(2,615)$(25,608)
    Decrease (increase) in net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities, net of taxes(1)(3)  31        31 
    Less: Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income, net of taxes  (11)       (11)
    FX translation adjustment, net of taxes(2)    (2,974)     (2,974)
    Cash flow hedges, net of taxes(3)      1,483    1,483 
    Pension liability adjustment, net of taxes        66  66 
                
    Change $20 $(2,974)$1,483 $66 $(1,405)
                
    Citigroup Stockholders AOCI balance, March 31, 2009 $(10,040)$(10,718)$(3,706)$(2,549)$(27,013)
                

    (1)
    Primarily related to mortgage-backedmunicipal securities activity.

    (2)
    Reflects, among other items, the movements in the Japanese yen, Korean won, Euro, Pound Sterling, Polish Zloty, Mexican peso Euro, Korean won, and Turkish lirathe Singapore dollar against the U.S. dollar, and changes in related tax effects.

    (3)
    Primarily reflectsDecrease (increase) in net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities, net of taxes includes the decreasechange in marketthe hedged senior debt securities retained from the sale of a portfolio of highly leveraged loans. The offsetting change in the corresponding cash flow hedge is reflected in Cash Flow hedges, net of taxes.

    15.   SECURITIZATIONS AND VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

    Overview

            Citigroup and its subsidiaries are involved with several types of off-balance sheet arrangements, including special purpose entities (SPEs). See Note 1 for a discussion of proposed accounting changes to SFAS 140,Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities (SFAS 140), and FASB Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (revised December 2003) (FIN 46 (R))."

    Uses of SPEs

            An SPE is an entity designed to fulfill a specific limited need of the company that organized it.

            The principal uses of SPEs are to obtain liquidity and favorable capital treatment by securitizing certain of Citigroup's financial assets to assist clients in securitizing their financial assets, and to create investment products for clients. SPEs may be organized in many legal forms including trusts, partnerships or corporations. In a securitization, the company transferring assets to an SPE converts those assets into cash before they would have been realized in the normal course of business, through the SPE's issuance of debt and equity instruments, certificates, commercial paper and other notes of indebtedness, which are recorded on the balance sheet of the SPE and not reflected on the transferring company's balance sheet, assuming applicable accounting requirements are satisfied. Investors usually have recourse to the assets in the SPE and often benefit from other credit enhancements, such as a collateral account or over collateralization in the form of excess assets in the SPE, or from a liquidity facility, such as a line of credit, liquidity put option or asset purchase agreement. The SPE can typically obtain a more favorable credit rating from rating agencies than the transferor could obtain for its own debt issuances, resulting in less expensive financing costs. The SPE may also enter into derivative contracts in order to convert the yield or currency of the underlying assets to match the needs of the SPE investors, or to limit or change the credit risk of the SPE. Citigroup may be the provider of certain credit enhancements as well as the counterparty to any related derivative contracts.

            SPEs may be Qualifying SPEs (QSPEs) or Variable Interest Entities (VIEs) or neither.

    Qualifying SPEs

            QSPEs are a special class of SPEs defined in SFAS 140. QSPEs have significant limitations on the types of assets and derivative instruments they may own or enter into and the types and extent of activities and decision-making they may engage in. Generally, QSPEs are passive entities designed to purchase assets and pass through the cash flows from those assets to the investors in the QSPE. QSPEs may not actively manage their assets through discretionary sales and are generally limited to making decisions inherent in servicing activities and issuance of liabilities. QSPEs are generally exempt from consolidation by the transferor of assets to the QSPE and any investor or counterparty.

    Variable Interest Entities

            VIEs are entities defined in FIN 46(R), as entities that have either a total equity investment that is insufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or whose equity investors lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest rates during(i.e., ability to make significant decisions through voting rights, right to receive the first quarterexpected residual returns of 2008the entity and obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity). Investors that finance the VIE through debt or equity interests or other counterparties that provide other forms of support, such as guarantees, subordinated fee arrangements, or certain types of derivative contracts, are variable interest holders in Citigroup's pay-fixed/receive-floating swap programs hedging floating rate depositsthe entity. The variable interest holder, if any, that will absorb a majority of the entity's expected losses, receive a majority of the entity's expected residual returns, or both, is deemed to be the primary beneficiary and long-term debt. Also reflectsmust consolidate the wideningVIE. Consolidation of a VIE is, therefore, determined based primarily on variability generated in scenarios that are considered most likely to occur, rather than based on scenarios that are considered more remote. Certain variable interests may absorb significant amounts of losses or residual returns contractually, but if those scenarios are considered very unlikely to occur, they may not lead to consolidation of the VIE.

            All of these facts and circumstances are taken into consideration when determining whether the Company has variable interests that would deem it the primary beneficiary and, therefore, require consolidation of the related VIE or otherwise rise to the level where disclosure would provide useful information to the users of the Company's financial statements. In some cases, it is qualitatively clear based on the extent of the Company's involvement or the seniority of its investments that the Company is not the primary beneficiary of the VIE. In other cases, a more detailed and quantitative analysis is required to make such a determination.

            The Company generally considers the following types of involvement to be significant:

            In various other transactions, the Company may act as a derivative counterparty (for example, interest rate spreads duringswap, cross-currency swap, or purchaser of credit protection under a credit default swap or total return swap where the period.Company pays the total return on certain assets to the SPE); may act as underwriter or placement agent; may provide administrative, trustee, or other services; or may make a market in debt securities or other


    instruments issued by VIEs. The Company generally considers such involvement, by itself, "not significant" under FIN 46(R).


    14.   Securitizations         Citigroup's involvement with QSPEs, Consolidated and Variable Interest EntitiesUnconsolidated VIEs with which the Company holds significant variable interests as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 is presented below:

    As of March 31, 2009 
     
      
      
      
      
     Maximum exposure to loss in significant unconsolidated VIEs(1) 
     
      
      
      
      
     Funded exposures(3) Unfunded exposures(4) 
    In millions of dollars Total
    involvement
    with SPE assets
     QSPE
    assets
     Consolidated
    VIE assets
     Significant
    unconsolidated
    VIE assets(2)
     Debt
    investments
     Equity
    investments
     Funding
    commitments
     Guarantees and
    derivatives
     
    Consumer Banking                         
    Credit card securitizations $117,943 $117,943 $ $ $ $ $ $ 
    Mortgage securitizations  539,628  539,628             
    Student loan securitizations  15,333  15,333             
    Other  1,273    1,273           
                      
    Total $674,177 $672,904 $1,273 $ $ $ $ $ 
                      
    Institutional Clients Group                         
    Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP) $50,323 $ $ $50,323 $5 $ $49,368 $950 
    Third-party commercial paper conduits  18,955      18,955  2    1,167  20 
    Collateralized debt obligations (CDOs)  25,197    8,409  16,788  655      473 
    Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs)  23,013    68  22,945  1,837    43  225 
    Mortgage loan securitization  84,629  84,629             
    Asset-based financing  88,590    2,725  85,865  21,624  112  2,951  117 
    Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs)  28,456  5,595  14,704  8,157  185    6,515  107 
    Municipal investments  17,142    871  16,271    2,315  749   
    Client intermediation  9,602    3,023  6,579  1,463       
    Investment funds  8,280    1,302  6,978    167     
    Other  15,159  4,546  3,972  6,641  784  85  334   
                      
    Total $369,346 $94,770 $35,074 $239,502 $26,555 $2,679 $61,127 $1,892 
                      
    Global Wealth Management                         
    Investment funds $57 $ $37 $20 $17 $ $2 $ 
    Other  30    30           
                      
    Total $87 $ $67 $20 $17 $ $2 $ 
                      
    Corporate/Other                         
    Trust preferred securities $24,694 $ $ $24,694 $ $162 $ $ 
                      
    Total Citigroup $1,068,304 $767,674 $36,414 $264,216 $26,572 $2,841 $61,129 $1,892 
                      

    (1)
    The definition of maximum exposure to loss is included in the text that follows.

    (2)
    A significant unconsolidated VIE is an entity where the Company has any variable interest considered to be significant, regardless of the likelihood of loss or the notional amount of exposure.

    (3)
    Included in Citigroup's March 31, 2009 Consolidated Balance Sheet.

    (4)
    Not included in Citigroup's March 31, 2009 Consolidated Balance Sheet.

     As of March 31, 2009
    (continued)
     As of December 31, 2008(1)
    In millions of dollars
     
     
    Total
    maximum exposure to loss
    in significant unconsolidated
    VIEs (continued)(3)
     Total
    involvement
    with SPEs
     QSPE
    assets
     Consolidated
    VIE assets
     Significant
    unconsolidated
    VIE assets(2)
     Maximum exposure to loss in
    significant unconsolidated
    VIE assets(3)
     
     $ $123,867 $123,867 $ $ $ 
        584,154  584,151  3     
        15,650  15,650       
        1,446    1,446     
                 
     $ $725,117 $723,668 $1,449 $ $ 
                 
     $50,323 $59,635 $ $ $59,635 $59,635 
      1,189  20,755      20,755  1,399 
      1,128  30,060    11,466  18,594  1,473 
      2,105  22,953    122  22,831  1,682 
        87,209  87,209       
      24,804  102,154    3,847  98,307  28,231 
      6,807  30,071  6,504  14,619  8,948  7,884 
      3,064  17,138    866  16,272  3,536 
      1,463  9,464    3,811  5,653  1,537 
      167  10,556    2,157  8,399  158 
      1,203  18,411  4,751  5,270  8,390  1,262 
                 
     $92,253 $408,406 $98,464 $42,158 $267,784 $106,797 
                 
     $19 $71 $ $45 $26 $32 
        9    9     
                 
     $19 $80 $ $54 $26 $32 
                 
     $162 $23,899 $ $ $23,899 $162 
                 
     $92,434 $1,157,502 $822,132 $43,661 $291,709 $106,991 
                 

    (1)
    Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.

    (2)
    A significant unconsolidated VIE is an entity where the Company has any variable interest considered to be significant, regardless of the likelihood of loss or the notional amount of exposure.

    (3)
    The definition of maximum exposure to loss is included in the text that follows.

            This table does not include:

            The asset balances for consolidated VIEs represent the carrying amounts of the assets consolidated by the Company. The carrying amount may represent the amortized cost or the current fair value of the assets depending on the legal form of the asset (e.g., security or loan) and the Company's standard accounting policies for the asset type and line of business.

            The asset balances for unconsolidated VIEs where the Company has significant involvement represent the most current information available to the Company. In most cases, the asset balances represent an amortized cost basis without regard to impairments in fair value, unless fair value information is readily available to the Company. For VIEs that obtain asset exposures synthetically through derivative instruments (for example, synthetic CDOs), the Company includes the full original notional amount of the derivative as an asset.

            The maximum funded exposure represents the balance sheet carrying amount of the Company's investment in the VIE. It reflects the initial amount of cash invested in the VIE plus any accrued interest and is adjusted for any impairments in value recognized in earnings and any cash principal payments received. The maximum exposure of unfunded positions represents the remaining undrawn committed amount, including liquidity and credit facilities provided by the Company, or the notional amount of a derivative instrument considered to be a variable interest, adjusted for any declines in fair value recognized in earnings. In certain transactions, the Company has entered into derivative instruments or other arrangements that are not considered variable interests in the VIE under FIN 46(R) (e.g., interest rate swaps, cross-currency swaps, or where the Company is the purchaser of credit protection under a credit default swap or total return swap where the Company pays the total return on certain assets to the SPE). Receivables under such arrangements are not included in the maximum exposure amounts.

    Consolidated VIEs—Balance Sheet Classification

            The following table presents the carrying amounts and classifications of consolidated assets that are collateral for consolidated VIE obligations:

    In billions of dollars March 31,
    2009
     December 31,
    2008
     
    Cash $0.9 $1.9 
    Trading account assets  14.4  21.0 
    Investments  16.6  15.8 
    Loans  2.2  2.6 
    Other assets  2.3  2.4 
          
    Total assets of consolidated VIEs $36.4 $43.7 
          

            The following table presents the carrying amounts and classification of the third-party liabilities of the consolidated VIEs:

    In billions of dollars March 31,
    2009
     December 31,
    2008
     
    Trading account liabilities $1.1 $0.5 
    Short-term borrowings  16.6  17.0 
    Long-term debt  5.9  6.8 
    Other liabilities  0.8  3.0 
          
    Total liabilities of consolidated VIEs $24.4 $27.3 
          

            The consolidated VIEs included in the table above represent hundreds of separate entities with which the Company primarilyis involved. In general, the third-party investors in the obligations of consolidated VIEs have legal recourse only to the assets of the VIEs and do not have such recourse to the Company, except where the Company has provided a guarantee to the investors or is the counterparty to certain derivative transactions involving the VIE. In addition, the assets are generally restricted only to pay such liabilities. Thus, the Company's maximum legal exposure to loss related to consolidated VIEs is significantly less than the carrying value of the consolidated VIE assets due to outstanding third-party financing. Intercompany liabilities are excluded from the table.

    Significant Interests in VIEs—Balance Sheet Classification

            The following table presents the carrying amounts and classification of significant interests in VIEs:

    In billions of dollars March 31,
    2009
     December 31,
    2008
     
    Trading account assets $5.8 $6.3 
    Investments  8.8  11.0 
    Loans  14.5  15.9 
    Other assets  0.6  0.5 
          
    Total assets of significant interest in consolidated VIEs $29.7 $33.7 
          


    In billions of dollars March 31,
    2009
     December 31,
    2008
     
    Trading account liabilities $0.0 $0.2 
    Long-term debt  0.4  0.4 
    Other liabilities  0.5  0.6 
          
    Total liabilities of significant interest in consolidated VIEs $0.9 $1.2 
          

    Credit Card Securitizations

            The Company securitizes credit card receivables through trusts which are established to purchase the receivables. Citigroup sells receivables into the QSPE trusts on a non-recourse basis. Credit card securitizations are revolving securitizations; that is, as customers pay their credit card balances, the cash proceeds are used to purchase new receivables and mortgages. Other typesreplenish the receivables in the trust. The Company relies on securitizations to fund a significant portion of its managedNorth America Cards business.

            The following table reflects amounts related to the Company's securitized credit card receivables at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008:

    In billions of dollars March 31,
    2009
     December 31,
    2008
     
    Principal amount of credit card receivables in trusts $117.9 $123.9 
          
    Ownership interests in principal amount of trust credit card receivables:       
    Sold to investors via trust-issued securities  97.5  98.2 
    Retained by Citigroup as trust-issued securities  7.8  6.5 
    Retained by Citigroup via non-certificated interests recorded as consumer loans  12.6  19.2 
          
    Total ownership interests in principal amount of trust credit card receivables $117.9 $123.9 
          
    Other amounts recorded on the balance sheet related to interests retained in the trusts:       
    Other retained interests in securitized assets $4.0 $3.1 
    Residual interest in securitized assets(1)  1.5  1.7 
    Amounts payable to trusts  2.5  1.7 
          

    (1)
    Includes net unbilled interest in sold balances of $0.6 billion and $0.6 billion as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.

            The Company recorded net gains (losses) from securitization of credit card receivables of $35 million and $221 million during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Net gains (losses) reflect the following:

            The following table summarizes selected cash flow information related to credit card securitizations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008:

    In billions of dollars March 31,
    2009
     March 31,
    2008
     
    Proceeds from new securitizations $12.9 $10.0 
    Proceeds from collections reinvested in new receivables  47.0  55.0 
    Contractual servicing fees received  0.5  0.5 
    Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows  1.5  2.0 
          

            Key assumptions used in measuring the fair value of retained interests at the date of sale or securitization of credit card receivables for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, are as follows:

     
     March 31,
    2009
     March 31,
    2008
    Discount rate 19.7% 17.9%
    Constant prepayment rate 6.0% to 11.0% 7.5% to 11.6%
    Anticipated net credit losses 12.6% 7.2%
         

            The constant prepayment rate assumption range reflects the projected payment rates over the life of a credit card balance, excluding new card purchases. This results in a high payment in the early life of the securitized include corporate debt instruments (in cashbalances followed by a much lower payment rate, which is depicted in the disclosed range.

            The effect of two negative changes in each of the key assumptions used to determine the fair value of retained interests is required to be disclosed. The negative effect of each change must be calculated independently, holding all other assumptions constant. Because the key assumptions may not in fact be independent, the net effect of simultaneous adverse changes in the key assumptions may be less than the sum of the individual effects shown below.

            At March 31, 2009, the key assumptions used to value retained interests and synthetic form), auto loans,the sensitivity of the fair value to adverse changes of 10% and student loans.20% in each of the key assumptions were as follows:


    March 31,
    2009
    Discount rate19.7%
    Constant prepayment rate6.0% to 10.7%
    Anticipated net credit losses12.6%
    Weighted average life11.7 months


    In millions of dollars Residual
    interest
     Retained
    certificates
     Other
    retained
    interests
     
    Carrying value of retained interests $904 $7,446 $4,641 
            
    Discount rates          
     Adverse change of 10% $(42)$(84)$(6)
     Adverse change of 20%  (83) (167) (12)
    Constant prepayment rate          
     Adverse change of 10% $(82)$ $ 
     Adverse change of 20%  (156)    
    Anticipated net credit losses          
     Adverse change of 10% $(378)$ $(77)
     Adverse change of 20%  (747)   (154)
            

    Managed Loans

            After securitization of credit card receivables, the Company continues to maintain credit card customer account relationships and provides servicing for receivables transferred to the trusts. As a result, the Company considers the securitized credit card receivables to be part of the business it manages.

    The Company also arranges for third partiesfollowing tables present a reconciliation between the managed basis and on-balance sheet credit card portfolios and the related delinquencies (loans which are 90 days or more past due) and credit losses, net of recoveries.

    In millions of dollars, except loans in billions March 31,
    2009
     December 31,
    2008
     
    Loan amounts, at period end       
    On balance sheet $75.2 $87.5 
    Securitized amounts  106.0  105.9 
    Loans held-for-sale     
          
    Total managed loans $181.2 $193.4 
          
    Delinquencies, at period end       
    On balance sheet $2,583 $2,490 
    Securitized amounts  3,138  2,655 
    Loans held-for-sale     
          
    Total managed delinquencies $5,721 $5,145 
          


    Credit losses, net of recoveries, for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 2008 
    On balance sheet $1,943 $1,248 
    Securitized amounts  2,549  1,591 
    Loans held-for-sale     
          
    Total managed $4,492 $2,839 
          

    Funding, Liquidity Facilities and Subordinated Interests

            Citigroup securitizes credit card receivables through three securitization trusts. The trusts are funded through a mix of sources, including commercial paper and medium- and long-term notes. Term notes can be issued at a fixed or floating rate.

            During the first quarter of 2009, the credit card securitization trusts increased their participation in certain government programs aimed at financing the purchase of asset-backed securities. As of March 31, 2009, the Omni Master Trust (the "Omni Trust") had approximately $14.9 billion of commercial paper outstanding, issued directly or indirectly through the Commercial Paper Funding Facility (CPFF), up from $6.9 billion at December 31, 2008. In addition, during the first quarter of 2009, the Citibank Master Credit Card Trust (the "Master Trust") issued a $3 billion term note through the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF), which was a new program launched by the government in March 2009.

            Citigroup is the sole provider of full liquidity facilities to the commercial paper programs of the two primary securitization trusts with which it transacts. Both of these facilities, which represent contractual obligations on the part of Citigroup to provide liquidity for the issued commercial paper, are made available on market terms to each of the trusts. The liquidity facilities require Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. to purchase the commercial paper issued by each trust at maturity, if the commercial paper does not roll over, as long as there are available credit enhancementenhancements outstanding, typically in the form of subordinated notes. The liquidity commitment related to the trusts, including cash collateral accounts, subordinated securities,Omni Trust commercial paper programs, amounted to $12.5 billion at March 31, 2009 and letters$8.5 billion at December 31, 2008, respectively. The liquidity commitment related to the Master Trust commercial paper program amounted to $11 billion at both March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008. As of credit. As specified in someMarch 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, none of the sale agreements,liquidity commitments were drawn. During the net revenue collected each month is accumulated upsecond quarter of 2009, $4 billion of the Omni Trust liquidity facility was drawn.

            In addition, Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. provides liquidity to a predetermined maximum amount,third-party, non-consolidated multi-seller commercial paper conduit, which is not a VIE. The commercial paper conduit has acquired notes issued by the Omni Trust. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. provides the liquidity facility on market terms. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. will be required to act in its capacity as liquidity provider as long as there are available credit enhancements outstanding and if: (1) the conduit is availableunable to roll over its maturing commercial paper; or (2) Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. loses its A-1/P-1 credit rating. The liquidity commitment to the remaining termthird party conduit was $6.1 billion at March 31, 2009 and $4 billion at December 31, 2008. As of that transactionMarch, 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, none of this liquidity commitment was drawn.

            All three securitization trusts—Master Trust, Omni Trust, and Broadway Trust—have had bonds placed on ratings watch by rating agencies. The Master Trust and Broadway Trust had bonds placed on ratings watch with negative implications during the first quarter of 2009. As a result of the ratings watch status, certain actions were taken or announced with respect to make payments of yield, fees, and transaction coststhe Master Trust. The actions subordinated certain senior interests in the eventtrust assets that net cash flows fromwere retained by Citigroup, which effectively placed these interests below investor interests in terms of priority of payment. While the receivables areOmni Trust bonds had not sufficient. Oncebeen placed on ratings watch status until April 2009, the predeterminedOmni Trust had nonetheless previously issued a subordinated note with a face amount of $265 million in October 2008 to Citibank (South Dakota) N.A., in order to avert a downgrade of its outstanding AAA and A securities. The Federal Reserve concluded that as a result of these actions, commencing with the first quarter of 2009, Citigroup is reached, net revenue is recognizedalso required to include the sold assets of the Master and Omni trusts in its risk-weighted assets for purposes of calculating its risk-based capital ratios. The effect of this decision increased Citigroup's risk-weighted assets by approximately $82 billion, and decreased Citigroup's Tier 1 Capital ratio by approximately 100 bps, as of March 31, 2009. In April 2009, the Omni Trust issued $2.3 billion of additional subordinated bonds. The bonds were acquired by Citibank (South Dakota) N.A. The subordinated bonds were issued by the Omni Trust in response to the ratings watch status.

            On April 30, 2009, the Broadway Trust issued a subordinated note with a face amount of $82 million. This note was acquired by Citibank, N.A. As with the Master and Omni trust actions, this action will also require the inclusion of the sold assets of the Broadway Trust in Citigroup's risk-


    weighted assets in the second quarter of 2009, thereby increasing Citigroup's risk-weighted assets by approximately $900 million.

            In December 2008, the excess spread for the Master Trust fell below the trigger level of 4.50%. Beginning in January 2009, this event required the excess cash in the Master Trust to be diverted to a spread account set aside for the benefit of the investors in the Trust, instead of reverting back to Citigroup subsidiaryimmediately. The excess spread is a measure of the profitability of the credit card accounts in the Master Trust expressed as a percent of the principal balance outstanding. In February 2009, the three-month average excess spread moved back above the trigger level of 4.50%. As such, the funds that soldhad been deposited into the receivables.spread account were released back to Citigroup.


    Mortgage Securitizations

            The Company provides a wide range of mortgage and other loan products to a diverse customer base. In connection with the securitization of these loans, the Company's U.S. Consumer mortgage business retains the servicing rights, which entitle the Company to a future stream of cash flows based on the outstanding principal balances of the loans and the contractual servicing fee. Failure to service the loans in accordance with contractual requirements may lead to a termination of the servicing rights and the loss of future servicing fees. In non-recourse servicing, the principal credit risk to the Company is the cost of temporary advances of funds. In recourse servicing, the servicer agrees to share credit risk with the owner of the mortgage loans, such as FNMA or FHLMC, or with a private investor, insurer or guarantor. Losses on recourse servicing occur primarily when foreclosure sale proceeds of the property underlying a defaulted mortgage loan are less than the outstanding principal balance and accrued interest of the loan and the cost of holding and disposing of the underlying property. The Company's mortgage loan securitizations are primarily non-recourse, thereby effectively transferring the risk of future credit losses to the purchasers of the securities issued by the trust. Markets &Securities and Banking retains servicing for a limited number of its mortgage securitizations.

            The Company's Consumer business provides a wide range of mortgage loan products to its customers. Once originated, the Company often securitizes these loans through the use of QSPEs. These QSPEs are funded through the issuance of Trust Certificates backed solely by the transferred assets. These certificates have the same average life as the transferred assets. In addition to providing a source of liquidity and less expensive funding, securitizing these assets also reduces the Company's credit exposure to the borrowers. These mortgage loan securitizations are primarily non-recourse, thereby effectively transferring the risk of future credit losses to the purchasers of the securities issued by the trust. However, the Company generally retains the servicing rights and in certain instances retains investment securities, interest-only strips and residual interests in future cash flows from the trusts.

            The following tables summarize selected cash flow information related to credit card, mortgage and certain other securitizations for the three months ended March 31, 20082009 and 2007:2008:

     
     Three Months Ended March 31, 2008
    In billions of dollars

     Credit
    cards

     U.S. Consumer
    mortgages

     Markets &
    Banking
    mortgages

     Other
    Proceeds from new securitizations $10.0 $23.7 $2.0 $0.1
    Proceeds from collections reinvested in new receivables  55.0      0.3
    Contractual servicing fees received  0.5  0.4    
    Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows  2.0  0.2  0.1  0.1
      
     
     
     

     Three Months Ended March 31, 2007
     Three months ended
    March 31, 2009
     
    In billions of dollars

     Credit
    cards

     U.S. Consumer
    mortgages

     Markets &
    Banking
    mortgages

     Other
     U.S.
    Consumer
    mortgages
     Securities
    and Banking
    mortgages
     
    Proceeds from new securitizations $6.3 $20.5 $16.5 $1.4 $20.0 $1.3 
    Proceeds from collections reinvested in new receivables 51.9   0.5
    Contractual servicing fees received 0.5 0.3   0.4  
    Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows 2.1    0.1  
     
     
     
     
         


     
     Three months ended
    March 31, 2008
     
    In billions of dollars U.S.
    Consumer
    mortgages
     Securities
    and Banking
    mortgages
     
    Proceeds from new securitizations $23.7 $2.0 
    Contractual servicing fees received  0.4   
    Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows  0.2  0.1 
          

            The Company recognizeddid not recognize gains (losses) on securitizationsthe securitization of U.S. Consumer mortgages in the first quarter of 2009. There were securitization gains of $2 million and $53 million for the three months periods ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The gains declined in 2008 due to the adoption of SFAS 159 for most mortgage loans held-for-sale. In the first quarter of 2008 and 2007, the Company recorded gains of $221 million and $335 million related to the securitization of credit card receivables.2008. Gains (losses) recognized on the securitization of Markets &Securities and Banking activities and other assets during the first three months ended March 31 of 2009 and 2008 and 2007 were $5$4 million and $13$4 million, respectively.


            Key assumptions used for the securitization of credit cards, mortgages, and certain other assets during the first quarter of 2008 and 2007 in measuring the fair value of retained interests at the date of sale or securitization of mortgage receivables for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:

     
     Three Months Ended months ended
    March 31, 20082009

     
     Credit cardsU.S.
    Consumer
    mortgages

     U.S. ConsumerSecurities
    Mortgagesand Banking
    mortgages

    Markets & Banking
    Mortgages

    Discount rate 13.3%12.9% to 17.9%15.0% 10.6%2.9% to 13.2%0.7% to 47.8%52.2%
    Constant prepayment rate 7.0%6.4% to 21.1%18.2% 7.3%2.0% to 25.3%4.0% to 37.5%48.3%
    Anticipated net credit losses 4.7% to 7.2%0.1% N/A20.0%40.0% to 85.0%
     


     
     Three Months Ended months ended
    March 31, 200731,2008

     
     Credit cardsU.S.
    Consumer
    mortgages

     U.S. ConsumerSecurities
    Mortgagesand Banking
    mortgages

    Markets & Banking
    Mortgages

    Discount rate 12.8%10.6% to 16.2%13.2% 10.4%0.7% to 17.2%4.1% to 27.9%47.8%
    Constant prepayment rate 6.5%7.3% to 21.2%25.3% 7.9%4.0% to 21.4%10.0% to 52.5%37.5%
    Anticipated net credit losses 3.7% to 6.1% N/A20.0% to 85.0%
     24.0% to 100.0%

            The range in the key assumptions for retained interests in Securities and Banking is due to the different characteristics of the interests retained by the Company. The interests retained by Securities and Banking range from highly rated and/or senior in the capital structure to unrated and/or residual interests.

            As required by SFAS 140, theThe effect of two negative changes in each of the key assumptions used to determine the fair value of retained interests mustis required to be disclosed. The negative effect of each change must be calculated independently, holding all other assumptions constant. Because the key assumptions may not in fact be independent, the net effect of simultaneous adverse changes in the key assumptions may be less than the sum of the individual effects shown below.

            At March 31, 2008,2009, the key assumptions used to value retained interests and the sensitivity of the fair value to adverse changes of 10% and 20% in each of the key assumptions were as follows:

    Key Assumptions at March 31, 2008

     
     March 31, 20082009
     
     Credit CardsU.S. Consumer
    mortgages

     U.S. ConsumerSecurities and
    Mortgages(1)Banking mortgages

    Markets & Banking
    Mortgages

    Other(2)
    Discount rate 14.5%11.2%2.9% to 17.9%13.8%0.7% to 47.8%11.0% to 13.0%52.2%
    Constant prepayment rate 7.0%28.6%2.0% to 20.4%14.5%4.0% to 37.5%1.5% to 11.5%48.3%
    Anticipated net credit losses 5.2% to 6.7%0.1%N/A20.0%40.0% to 85.0%0.3% to 0.7%
    Weighted average life10.6 to 11.0 months7 years0.7 to 17.4 years3.8 years

    (1)
    Includes mortgage servicing rights.

    (2)
    Other includes student loans and other assets.

     
     March 31, 2008
     
    In millions of dollars

     Credit
    cards

     U.S. Consumer
    mortgages

     Markets & Banking
    mortgages

     Other(1)
     
    Carrying value of retained interests $12,594 $13,278 $3,401 $1,784 
      
     
     
     
     
    Discount Rates             
    Adverse change of 10% $(38)$(363)$(216)$(27)
    Adverse change of 20%  (134) (700) (310) (53)
      
     
     
     
     
    Constant prepayment rate             
    Adverse change of 10% $(211)$(593)$(19)$(13)
    Adverse change of 20%  (413) (1,155) (32) (26)
      
     
     
     
     
    Anticipated net credit losses             
    Adverse change of 10% $(536)$(7)$(97)$(8)
    Adverse change of 20%  (1,067) (15) (171) (15)
      
     
     
     
     

    (1)
    Other includes student loans and other assets. Sensitivity analysis excludes $609 million of retained interests that are valued using third-party quotations and thus are not dependent on proprietary valuation models.

    Managed Loans

     After securitization of credit card receivables, the Company continues to maintain credit card customer account relationships and provides servicing for receivables transferred to the trusts. As a result, the Company considers the securitized credit card receivables to be part of the business it manages.


    In millions of dollars U.S. Consumer
    mortgages
     Securities and
    Banking mortgages
     

    Carrying value of retained interests

     $6,755 $1,158 
          

    Discount rates

           
     

    Adverse change of 10%

     $(154)$(30)
     

    Adverse change of 20%

      (300) (63)

    Constant prepayment rate

           
     

    Adverse change of 10%

     $(462)$(8)
     

    Adverse change of 20%

      (877) (17)

    Anticipated net credit losses

           
     

    Adverse change of 10%

     $(21)$(39)
     

    Adverse change of 20%

      (42) (75)
          

            The following tables present a reconciliation between the managed basis and on-balance sheet credit card portfolios and the related delinquencies (loans which are 90 days or more past due) and credit losses, net of recoveries.

    In millions of dollars, except loans in billions

     Mar. 31,
    2008

     Dec. 31,
    2007

    Loan amounts, at period end      
    On balance sheet $83.7 $88.5
    Securitized amounts  109.3  108.1
    Loans held-for-sale  0.9  1.0
      
     
    Total managed loans $193.9 $197.6
      
     
    Delinquencies, at period end      
    On balance sheet $1,792 $1,820
    Securitized amounts  2,113  1,864
    Loans held-for-sale  14  14
      
     
    Total managed delinquencies $3,919 $3,698
      
     
    Credit losses, net of recoveries, for the quarter ended March 31,

     2008
     2007
    On balance sheet $1,178 $823
    Securitized amounts  1,590  1,150
    Loans held-for-sale    
      
     
    Total managed $2,768 $1,973
      
     

    Mortgage Servicing Rights

            The fair value of capitalized mortgage loan servicing rights (MSRs)(MSR) was $7.7$5.5 billion and $8.8$7.7 billion at March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The MSRs correspond to principal loan balances of $610 billion and 2007,$626 billion as of March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The following table summarizes the changes in capitalized MSRs:MSRs for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008:


     Three Months Ended March 31,
     
    In millions of dollars

      2009 2008 
    2008
     2007
     
    Balance, beginning of period $8,380 $5,439 
    Balance, beginning of year $5,657 $8,380 
    Originations 345 427  235 345 
    Purchases 1 3,119   1 
    Changes in fair value of MSRs due to changes in inputs and assumptions (561) 125  174 (561)
    Transfer to Trading account assets (104)    (104)
    Other changes(1) (345) (278) (585) (345)
     
     
          
    Balance, end of period $7,716 $8,832 
    Balance, end of year $5,481 $7,716 
     
     
          

    (1)
    Represents changes due to customer payments and passage of time.

            The market for MSRs is not sufficiently liquid to provide participants with quoted market prices. Therefore, the Company uses an option-adjusted spread valuation approach to determine the fair value of MSRs. This approach consists of projecting servicing cash flows under multiple interest rate scenarios and discounting these cash flows using risk-adjusted discount rates. The key assumptions used in the valuation of MSRs include mortgage prepayment speeds and discount rates. The model assumptions and the MSRs' fair value estimates are compared to observable trades of similar MSR portfolios and interest-only security portfolios, as available, as well as to MSR broker valuations and industry surveys. The cash flow model and underlying prepayment and interest rate models used to value these MSRs are subject to validation in accordance with the Company's model validation policies.

            The fair value of the MSRs is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates. In managing this risk, the Company economically hedges a significant portion of the value of its MSRs through the use of interest rate derivative contracts, forward purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities and purchased securities classified as trading.

            The Company receives fees during the course of servicing previously securitized mortgages. The amount of contractually specified servicingthese fees late fees and ancillary fees earned were $411 million, $26 million and $17 million, respectively, for the first quarterthree months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 and $287 million, $16 million, and $12 million, respectively, for the first quarter of 2007.were as follows:

    In millions of dollars 2009 2008 
    Servicing fees $429 $411 
    Late fees  25  26 
    Ancillary fees  20  17 
          
    Total MSR fees $474 $454 
          

            These fees are classified in the Consolidated Statement of Income asCommissions and Fees.

    feesSpecial-Purpose Entities.


    Primary Uses of and Involvement in SPEsStudent Loan Securitizations

            Citigroup is involved with many types of special-purpose entities (SPEs) in the normal course of business. The primary uses of SPEs are to obtain sources of liquidity for the Company and its clients through securitization vehicles and commercial paper conduits; to create investment products for clients; to provide asset-based financing to clients; or to raise financing for the Company.

            The Company provides various products and servicesmaintains programs to SPEs. For example, it may:


            SPEs used by the Company are generally accounted for as qualifying SPEs (QSPEs) or Variable Interest Entities (VIEs), as described below.

    Qualifying SPEs

            QSPEs are a special class of SPEs defined in FASB Statement No. 140, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities" (SFAS 140). These SPEs have significant limitations on the types of assets and derivative instruments they may own and the types and extent of activities and decision-making they may engage in. Generally, QSPEs are passive entities designed to purchase assets and pass through the cash flows from those assets to the investors in the QSPE. QSPEs may not actively manage their assets through discretionary sales and are generally limited to making decisions inherent in servicing activities and issuance of liabilities. QSPEs are generally exempt from consolidation by the transferor of assets to the QSPE and any investor or counterparty.


            The following table summarizes the Company's involvement in QSPEs by business segment at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007:

     
     Assets of QSPEs
     Retained interests
    In million of dollars

     Mar. 31,
    2008

     Dec.31,
    2007

     Mar. 31,
    2008

     Dec. 31,
    2007

    Global Consumer            
    Credit Cards $120,695 $125,109 $12,594 $11,739
    Mortgages  517,845  516,802  13,308  13,801
    Other  14,539  14,882  892  981
      
     
     
     
    Total $653,079 $656,793 $26,794 $26,521
      
     
     
     
    Securities & Banking            
    Mortgages $87,832 $84,093 $3,401 $4,617
    Municipal TOBs  9,758  10,556  609  817
    DSC Securitizations and other  8,568  14,526  253  344
      
     
     
     
    Total $106,158 $109,175 $4,263 $5,778
      
     
     
     
    Citigroup Total $759,237 $765,968 $31,057 $32,299
      
     
     
     

    Credit Card Master Trusts

            The Company securitizes credit card receivables through trusts which are established to purchase the receivables. Citigroup sells receivables into the QSPE trusts on a non-recourse basis. Credit card securitizations are revolving securitizations; that is, as customers pay their credit card balances, the cash proceeds are used to purchase new receivables and replenish the receivables in the trust. The Company relies on securitizations to fund a significant portion of its managedU.S. Cards business.

            Citigroup is a provider of liquidity facilities to the commercial paper programs of the two primary securitization trusts it transacts with. Both facilities are made available on market terms to each trust. With respect to the Palisades commercial paper program in the Omni Master Trust, Citibank (South Dakota), N. A. is the sole provider of a full liquidity facility. The liquidity facility requires Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. to purchase Palisades's commercial paper at maturity if the commercial paper does not roll over as long as there are available credit enhancements outstanding, typicallyretains interests in the form of subordinated notes. The Palisades liquidity commitment amounted to $8.0 billion at March 31, 2008residual interests (i.e., interest-only strips) and $7.5 billion December 31, 2007. With respect to the Dakota commercial paper programservicing rights.

            Under terms of the Citibank Master Credit Card Trust, Citibank (South Dakota) N.A. became a partial liquidity provider duringtrust arrangements, the 2008 1st quarter. The liquidity commitmentCompany has no obligations to provide financial support and has not provided such support. A substantial portion of the credit risk associated with the securitized loans has been transferred to third-party guarantors or insurers either under the facility is limited to 15%Federal Family Education Loan Program, authorized by the U.S. Department of Education under the amountHigher Education Act of commercial paper outstanding. As of March 31, 2008, Citibank (South Dakota) N.A.'s participation is for approximately 43% of the facility, with the remainder provided by third party institutions. This facility requires Citibank (South Dakota) N.A. to purchase Dakota commercial paper 390 days after its issuance if the commercial paper does not roll over. As of March 31, 2008, the Dakota program had $9 billion of commercial paper outstanding.

    Mortgage and Other Consumer Loan Securitization Vehicles1965, as amended, or private credit insurance.

            The Company's Consumer business provides a wide range of mortgage and other consumer loan productsfollowing table summarizes selected cash flow information related to its customers. Once originated, the Company often securitizes these loans (primarily mortgage and student loans) through the use of QSPEs. In addition to providing a source of liquidity and less expensive funding, securitizing these assets also reduces the Company's credit exposure to the borrowers. These mortgage and student loan securitizations are primarily non-recourse, thereby effectively transferringfor the risk of future credit lossesthree months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008:

    In billions of dollars March 31,
    2009
     March 31,
    2008
     
    Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows $0.1 $ 
          

            At March 31, 2009, the key assumptions used to value retained interests and the purchaserssensitivity of the securities issued byfair value to adverse changes of 10% and 20% in each of the trust. However, the Company generally retains the servicing rights and a residual interest in future cash flows from the trusts.key assumptions were as follows:


    Retained interests
    Discount rate10.8% to 15.8%
    Constant prepayment rate0.6% to 6.8%
    Anticipated net credit losses0.2% to 1.6%


    In millions of dollars Retained interests 
    Carrying value of retained interests $841 
    Discount rates    
     Adverse change of 10% $(27)
     Adverse change of 20%  (51)
    Constant prepayment rate    
     Adverse change of 10% $(9)
     Adverse change of 20%  (17)
    Anticipated net credit losses    
     Adverse change of 10% $(7)
     Adverse change of 20%  (13)
        

    Municipal Tender Option Bond (TOB) QSPEsOn-Balance Sheet Securitizations

            The Company sponsors QSPE TOB trustsengages in on-balance sheet securitizations. These are securitizations that hold municipal securities and issue long-term senior floating-rate notes ("Floaters") to third-party investors and junior residual securities ("Residuals") todo not qualify for sales treatment; thus, the Company.

            Unlike other Proprietary TOB trusts, and to conform to the requirements for a QSPE, the Company has no ability to unilaterally unwind QSPE TOB trusts. The Company would reconsider consolidation of the QSPE TOB trusts in the event that the amount of Floaters held by third parties decreased to such a level that the QSPE TOB trusts no longer met the definition of a QSPE because of insufficient third-party investor ownership of the Floaters.

    Mutual Fund Deferred Sales Commission (DSC) Securitizations

            Mutual Fund Deferred Sales Commission (DSC) receivables are assets purchased from distributors of mutual funds that are backed by distribution fees and contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) generated by the distribution of certain shares to mutual fund investors. These share investors pay no upfront load, but the shareholder agrees to pay, in addition to the management fee imposed by the mutual fund, the distribution fee over a period of time and the CDSC (a penalty for early redemption to recover lost distribution fees). Asset managers use the proceeds from the sale of DSC receivables to cover the sales commissions associated with the shares sold.

            The Company purchases these receivables from mutual fund distributors and sells a diversified pool of receivables to a trust. The trust in turn issues two tranches of securities:


    Mortgage Loan Securitizations

            Markets & Banking is active in structuring and underwriting residential and commercial mortgage-backed securitizations. In these transactions, the Company or its customer transfers loans into a bankruptcy-remote SPE. These SPEs are designed to be QSPEs as described above. The Company may hold residual interests and other securities issued by the SPEs until


    they can be sold to independent investors, and makes a market in those securities on an ongoing basis. The Company sometimes retains servicing rights for certain entities. These securities are held as trading assetsremain on the Company's balance sheet, are managed as part of the Company's trading activities, and are marked—to-market with most changes in value recognized in earnings. The table above shows the assets and retained interests for mortgage QSPEs in which the Company acted as principal in transferring mortgages to the QSPE.

    Variable Interest Entities

            VIEs are entities defined in FIN 46-R as entities which either have a total equity investment at risk that is insufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or whose equity investors lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest (i.e., ability to make significant decisions through voting rights, right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity, and obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity). Investors that finance the VIE through debt or equity interests, or other counterparties that provide other forms of support, such as guarantees, subordinated fee arrangements, or certain types of derivative contracts, are variable interest holders in the entity. The variable interest holder, if any, that will absorb a majority of the entity's expected losses, receive a majority of the entity's expected residual returns, or both, is deemed to be the primary beneficiary and must consolidate the VIE. Consolidation under FIN 46-R is based onexpected losses and residual returns, which consider various scenarios on a probability-weighted basis. Consolidation of a VIE is, therefore, determined based primarily on variability generated in scenarios that are considered most likely to occur, rather than based on scenarios that are considered more remote. Certain variable interests may absorb significant amounts of losses or residual returns contractually, but if those scenarios are considered very unlikely to occur, they may not lead to consolidation of the VIE.

            All of these facts and circumstances are taken into consideration when determining whether the Company has variable interests that would deem it the primary beneficiary and, therefore, require consolidation of the related VIE or otherwise rise to the level where disclosure would provide useful information to the users of the Company's financial statements. In some cases, it is qualitatively clear based on the extent of the Company's involvement or the seniority of its investments that the Company is not the primary beneficiary of the VIE. In other cases, more detailed and quantitative analysis is required to make such a determination.

            FIN 46-R requires disclosure of the Company's maximum exposure to loss where the Company has "significant" variable interests in an unconsolidated VIE. FIN 46-R does not define "significant" and, as such, judgment is required. The Company generally considers the following types of involvement to be "significant":

            Thus, the Company's definition of "significant" involvement generally includes all variable interests held by the Company, even those where the likelihood of loss or the notional amount of exposure to any single legal entity is small. Involvement with a VIE as described above, regardless of the seniority or perceived risk of the Company's involvement, is included as significant. The Company believes that this more expansive interpretation of "significant" provides more meaningful and consistent information regarding its involvement in various VIE structures and provides more data for an independent assessment of the potential risks of the Company's involvement in various VIEs and asset classes.

            In various other transactions the Company may act as a derivative counterparty (for example, interest rate swap, cross-currency swap, or purchaser of credit protection under a credit default swap or total return swap where the Companypays the total return on certain assets to the SPE); may act as underwriter or placement agent; may provide administrative, trustee, or other services; or may make a market in debt securities or other instruments issued by VIEs. The Company generally considers such involvement, by itself, "not significant" under FIN 46-R.


    This page intentionally left blank


            The following tables summarize the Company's significant involvement in VIEs in millions of dollars:

    As of March 31, 2008
     
      
      
     Maximum exposure to loss in significant unconsolidated VIEs(2)
     
      
      
     Funded exposures
     Unfunded exposures
     
     Consolidated
    VIE assets

     Significant
    unconsolidated
    VIE assets(1)

     Debt
    investments

     Equity
    investments

     Funding
    Commitments

     Guarantees and
    derivatives

    Global Consumer                  
    Mortgages $62 $ $ $ $ $
    Investment funds  254  681  7  10    
    Leasing  35          
    Other  1,619          
      
     
     
     
     
     
    Total $1,970 $681 $7 $10 $ $
      
     
     
     
     
     
    Markets & Banking                  
    Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP) $ $71,858 $ $ $71,858 $
    Third-party commercial paper conduits    27,131      1,954  17
    Collateralized debt obligations (CDOs)  18,198  46,734  3,611      5,718
    Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs)  1,139  21,197  2,433    401  314
    Asset-based financing  3,179  111,722  28,403  45  7,761  
    Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs)  15,751  12,239      10,943  
    Municipal investments  991  14,644    1,676  954  
    Client intermediation  4,627  12,467  2,536    2  
    Other  12,954  9,837  1,440  47  380  
      
     
     
     
     
     
    Total $56,839 $327,829 $38,423 $1,768 $94,253 $6,049
      
     
     
     
     
     
    Global Wealth Management                  
    Investment funds $538 $46 $39 $ $6 $
      
     
     
     
     
     
    Alternative Investments                  
    Structured investment vehicles $46,809 $ $ $ $ $
    Investment funds  6,577  10,142    504    
      
     
     
     
     
     
    Total $53,386 $10,142 $ $504 $ $
      
     
     
     
     
     
    Corporate/Other                  
    Trust Preferred Securities $ $24,121 $ $162 $ $
      
     
     
     
     
     
    Total Citigroup $112,733 $362,819 $38,469 $2,444 $94,259 $6,049
      
     
     
     
     
     

    (1)
    A significant unconsolidated VIE is an entity where the Company has any variable interest considered to be significant as discussed on page 84, regardless of the likelihood of loss, or the notional amount of exposure.

    (2)
    The definition of maximum exposure to loss is included in the text that follows.

    As of March 31, 2008
    (continued)

      
      
      
    Maximum exposure to loss
    in significant unconsolidated
    VIEs (continued)

     As of December 31, 2007
    Total maximum exposure

     Consolidated
    VIE assets

     Significant
    unconsolidated
    VIE assets(1)

     Maximum exposure to loss in
    significant unconsolidated
    VIE assets(2)

    $ $63 $ $
     17  276  610  14
       35    
       1,385    

     
     
     
    $17 $1,759 $610 $14

     
     
     
     71,858 $ $72,558 $72,558
     1,971    27,021  2,154
     9,329  22,312  51,794  13,979
     3,147  1,353  21,874  4,762
     36,209  4,468  91,604  34,297
     10,943  17,003  22,570  17,843
     2,630  53  13,662  2,711
     2,538  2,790  9,593  1,643
     1,867  12,642  10,298  1,875

     
     
     
    $140,492 $60,621 $320,974 $151,822

     
     
     
    $45 $590 $52 $45
       
     
     
    $ $58,543 $ $
     504  45  10,934  205

     
     
     
    $504 $58,588 $10,934 $205

     
     
     
    $162 $ $23,756 $162

     
     
     
    $141,220 $121,558 $356,326 $152,248

     
     
     

    (1)
    A significant unconsolidated VIE is an entity where the Company has any variable interest considered to be significant, regardless of the likelihood of loss, or the notional amount of exposure.

    (2)
    The definition of maximum exposure to loss is included in the text that follows.

            These tables do not include:


            The asset balances for consolidated VIEs represent the carrying amounts of the assets consolidated by the Company. The carrying amount may represent the amortized cost or the current fair value of the assets depending on the legal form of the asset (security or loan) and the Company's standard accounting policies for the asset type and line of business.

            The asset balances for unconsolidated VIEs where the Company has significant involvement represent the most current information available to the Company regarding the remaining principal balance of cash assets owned. In most cases, the asset balances represent an amortized cost basis


    without regard to impairments in fair value, unless fair value information is readily available to the Company. For VIEs that obtain asset exposures synthetically through derivative instruments (for example, synthetic CDOs), the Company includes the full original notional amount of the derivative as an asset.

            The maximum funded exposure represents the balance sheet carrying amount of the Company's investment in the VIE in the form of purchased debt, funded loans or retained equity interest. It reflects the initial amount of cash invested in the VIE plus any accrued interest and is adjusted for any impairments in value recognized in earnings and any cash principal payments received. The maximum exposure of unfunded positions represents the remaining undrawn committed amount, including liquidity and credit facilities (such as guarantees) provided by the Company, or the notional amount of a derivative instrument considered to be a variable interest, adjusted for any declines in fair value recognized in earnings. In certain transactions, the Company has entered into derivative instruments or other arrangements that are not considered variable interests in the VIE under FIN 46-R (for example, interest rate swaps, cross-currency swaps, or where the Company is the purchaser of credit protection under a credit default swap or total return swap where the Companypays the total return on certain assets to the SPE). Receivables under such arrangements are not included in the maximum exposure amounts.

    Consolidated VIEs—Balance Sheet Classification

    sheet. The following table presents the carrying amounts and classification of consolidated assets thatand liabilities transferred in transactions from the Consumer credit card, student loan, mortgage and auto businesses, accounted for as secured borrowings:

    In billions of dollars March 31,
    2009
     December 31,
    2008
     
    Cash $0.4 $0.3 
    Available-for-sale securities  0.4  0.1 
    Loans  9.4  7.5 
    Allowance for loan losses  (0.1) (0.1)
          
    Total assets $10.1 $7.8 

    Long-term debt

     

    $

    8.0

     

    $

    6.3

     
    Other liabilities  0.1  0.3 
          
    Total liabilities $8.1 $6.6 
          

            All assets are collateral for VIE obligations:

    In billions of dollars

     March 31,
    2008

     December 31,
    2007

    Cash $14.4 $12.3
    Trading account assets  70.1  87.3
    Investments  17.8  15.0
    Loans  2.8  2.2
    Other assets  7.6  4.8
      
     
    Total assets of consolidated VIEs $112.7 $121.6
      
     

    restricted from being sold or pledged as collateral. The consolidated VIEs included incash flows from these assets are the table above represent hundreds of separate entities withonly source used to pay down the associated liabilities, which the Company is involved. In general, the third-party investors in the obligations of consolidated VIEs have recourse onlyare non-recourse to the assets of the VIEs and do not have recourse to the Company, except where the Company has provided a guarantee to the investors or is the counterparty to certain derivative transactions involving the VIE. Thus, the Company's maximum exposure to loss related to consolidated VIEs is significantly less than the carrying value of the consolidated VIE assets due to outstanding third-party financing.general assets.

    Citi-Administered Asset-Backed Commercial Paper Conduits

            The Company is active in the asset-backed commercial paper conduit business as administrator of several multi-seller commercial paper conduits, and also as a service provider to single-seller and other commercial paper conduits sponsored by third parties.

            The multi-seller commercial paper conduits are designed to provide the Company's customers access to low-cost funding in the commercial paper markets. The conduits purchase assets from or provide financing facilities to customers and are funded by issuing high-grade commercial paper to third-party investors. The conduits generally do not purchase assets originated by the Company. The funding of the conduit is facilitated by the liquidity support and credit enhancementenhancements provided by the Company and by certain third parties.Company.

            As administrator to the conduits, the Company is responsible for selecting and structuring of assets purchased or financed by the conduits, making decisions regarding the funding of the conduit,conduits, including determining the tenor and other features of the commercial paper issued, monitoring the quality and performance of the conduit'sconduits' assets, and facilitating the operations and cash flows of the conduit.conduits. In return, the Company earns structuring fees from clientscustomers for individual transactions and earns an administration fee from the conduit, which is equal to the income from client program and liquidity fees of the conduit after payment of interest costs and other fees. This administration fee is fairly stable, since most risks and rewards of the underlying assets are passed back to the customers and, once the asset pricing is negotiated, most ongoing income, costs and fees are relatively stable as a percentage of the conduit's size.

            The conduits administered by the Company do not generally invest in liquid securities that are formally rated


    by third parties. The assets are privately negotiated and structured transactions that are designed to be held by the conduit, rather than actively traded and sold. The yield earned by the conduit on each asset is generally tied to the rate on the commercial paper issued by the conduit, thus passing interest rate risk to the client. Each asset purchased by the conduit is structured with transaction-specific credit enhancement features provided by the third-party seller, including over-collateralization, cash and excess spread collateral accounts, direct recourse or third-party guarantees. These credit enhancements are sized with the objective of approximating a credit rating of A or above, based on the Company's internal risk ratings.

            Substantially all of the funding of the conduits is in the form of short-term commercial paper, with a weighted average life generally ranging from 30-45 days. As of March 31, 2009, and December 31, 2008, the weighted average life of the commercial paper issued was approximately 33 and 37 days, respectively. In addition, the conduits have issued subordinate loss notes and equity with a notional amount of approximately $80 million and varying remaining tenors ranging from three months to six years.

            The primary credit enhancement provided to the conduit investors is in the form of transaction-specific credit enhancement described above. In addition, there are two additional forms of credit enhancement that protect the commercial paper investors from defaulting assets. First, the subordinate loss notes issued by each conduit absorb any credit losses up to their full notional amount. It is expected that the subordinate loss notes issued by each conduit are sufficient to absorb a majority of the expected losses from each conduit, thereby making the single investor in the Subordinate Loss Note the primary beneficiary under FIN 46(R). Second, each conduit has obtained a letter of credit from the Company, which is generally 8-10% of the conduit's assets. The letters of credit provided by the Company total approximately $5.5 billion and are included in the Company's maximum exposure to loss. The net result across all multi-seller conduits administered by the Company is that, in the event defaulted assets exceed the transaction-specific credit enhancement described above, any losses in each conduit are allocated in the following order:

            The Company also provides the conduits with two forms of liquidity agreements that are used to provide funding to the conduits in the event of a market disruption, among other events. Each asset of the conduit is supported by a transaction-specific liquidity facility in the form of an asset purchase agreement (APA). Under the APA, the Company has agreed to purchase non-defaulted eligible receivables from the conduit at par. Any assets purchased under the APA are subject to increased pricing. The APA is not designed to provide credit support to the conduit, as it generally does not permit the purchase of defaulted or impaired assets and generally reprices the assets purchased to consider potential increased credit risk. The APA covers all assets in the conduits and is considered in the Company's maximum exposure to loss. In addition, the Company provides the conduits with program-wide liquidity in the form of short-term lending commitments. Under these commitments, the Company has agreed to lend to the conduits in the event of a short-term disruption in the commercial paper market, subject to specified conditions. The total notional exposure under the program-wide liquidity agreement is $11.3 billion and is considered in the Company's maximum exposure to loss. The Company receives fees for providing both types of liquidity agreement and considers these fees to be on fair market terms.

            Finally, the Company is one of several named dealers in the commercial paper issued by the conduits and earns a market-based fee for providing such services. Along with third-party dealers, the Company makes a market in the commercial paper and may from time to time fund commercial paper pending sale to a third party. On specific dates with less liquidity in the market, the Company may hold in inventory commercial paper issued by conduits administered by the Company, as well as conduits administered by third parties. The amount of commercial paper issued by its administered conduits held in inventory fluctuates based on market conditions and activity. As of March 31, 2009, the Company owned $5 million of commercial paper issued by its administered conduits.

            FIN 46(R) requires that the Company quantitatively analyze the expected variability of the conduit to determine whether the Company is the primary beneficiary of the conduit. The Company performs this analysis on a quarterly basis and has concluded that the Company is not the primary beneficiary of the conduits as defined in FIN 46(R) and, therefore, does not consolidate the conduits it administers. In conducting this analysis, the Company considers three primary sources of variability in the conduit: credit risk, interest-rate risk and fee variability.

            The Company models the credit risk of the conduit's assets using a Credit Value at Risk (C-VaR) model. The C-VaR model considers changes in credit spreads (both within a rating class as well as due to rating upgrades and downgrades), name-specific changes in credit spreads, credit defaults and recovery rates and diversification effects of pools of financial assets. The model incorporates data from independent rating agencies as well as the Company's own proprietary information regarding spread changes, ratings transitions and losses given default. Using this credit data, a Monte Carlo simulation is performed to develop a distribution of credit risk for the portfolio of assets owned by each conduit, which is then applied on a probability-weighted basis to determine expected losses due to credit risk. In addition, the Company continuously monitors the specific credit characteristics of the conduit's assets and the current credit environment to confirm that the C-VaR model used continues to incorporate the Company's best information regarding the expected credit risk of the conduit's assets.

            The Company also analyzes the variability in the fees that it earns from the conduit using monthly actual historical cash flow data to determine average fee and standard deviation measures for each conduit. Because any unhedged interest rate and foreign-currency risk not contractually passed on to


    customers is absorbed by the fees earned by the Company, the fee variability analysis incorporates those risks.

            The fee variability and credit risk variability are then combined into a single distribution of the conduit's overall returns. This return distribution is updated and analyzed on at least a quarterly basis to ensure that the amount of the subordinate loss notes issued to third parties is sufficient to absorb greater than 50% of the total expected variability in the conduit's returns. The expected variability absorbed by the subordinate loss note investors is therefore measured to be greater than the expected variability absorbed by the Company through its liquidity arrangements and other fees earned, and the investors in commercial paper and medium-term notes. While the notional amounts of the subordinate loss notes are quantitatively small compared to the size of the conduits, this is reflective of the fact that most of the substantive risks of the conduits are absorbed by the enhancements provided by the sellers (customers) and other third parties that provide transaction-level credit enhancement. Because FIN 46(R) requires these risks and related enhancements to be excluded from the analysis, the remaining risks and expected variability are quantitatively small. The calculation of variability under FIN 46(R) focuses primarily onexpected variability, rather than the risks associated with extreme outcomes (for example, large levels of default) that are expected to occur very infrequently. So while the subordinate loss notes are sized appropriately compared to expected losses as measured in FIN 46(R), they do not provide significant protection against extreme or unusual credit losses.

    Third-Party Commercial Paper Conduits

            The Company also provides liquidity facilities to single-andsingle- and multi-seller conduits sponsored by third parties. These conduits are independently owned and managed and invest in a variety of asset classes, depending on the nature of the conduit. The facilities provided by the Company typically represent a small portion of the total liquidity facilities obtained by each conduit, and are collateralized by the assets of each conduit. TheAs of March 31, 2009, the notional amount of these facilities iswas approximately $2.0$1.2 billion as of March 31, 2008, and $2.2 billion as of December 31, 2007. No amounts were$2 million was funded under these facilities.

    Collateralized Debt and Loan Obligations

            A collateralized debt obligation (CDO) is an SPE that purchases a pool of assets consisting of asset-backed securities and/orand synthetic exposures through derivatives on asset-backed securities and issues multiple tranches of equity and notes to investors. A third-party manager is typically retained by the CDO to select the pool of assets and manage those assets over the term of the CDO. The Company earns fees for warehousing assets prior to the creation of a CDO, structuring CDOs and placing debt securities with investors. In addition, the Company has retained interests in many of the CDOs it has structured and makes a market in those issued notes.

    Collateralized Loan Obligations        A cash CDO, or arbitrage CDO, is a CDO designed to take advantage of the difference between the yield on a portfolio of selected assets, typically residential mortgage-backed securities, and the cost of funding the CDO through the sale of notes to investors. "Cash flow" CDOs are vehicles in which the CDO passes on cash flows from a pool of assets, while "market value" CDOs pay to investors the market value of the pool of assets owned by the CDO at maturity. Both types of CDOs are typically managed by a third-party asset manager. In these transactions, all of the equity and notes issued by the CDO are funded, as the cash is needed to purchase the debt securities. In a typical cash CDO, a third-party investment manager selects a portfolio of assets, which the Company funds through a warehouse financing arrangement prior to the creation of the CDO. The Company then sells the debt securities to the CDO in exchange for cash raised through the issuance of notes. The Company's continuing involvement in cash CDOs is typically limited to investing in a portion of the notes or loans issued by the CDO and making a market in those securities, and acting as derivative counterparty for interest rate or foreign currency swaps used in the structuring of the CDO.

            A synthetic CDO is similar to a cash CDO, except that the CDO obtains exposure to all or a portion of the referenced assets synthetically through derivative instruments, such as credit default swaps. Because the CDO does not need to raise cash sufficient to purchase the entire referenced portfolio, a substantial portion of the senior tranches of risk is typically passed on to CDO investors in the form of unfunded liabilities or derivative instruments. Thus, the CDO writes credit protection on select referenced debt securities to the Company or third parties and the risk is then passed on to the CDO investors in the form of funded notes or purchased credit protection through derivative instruments. Any cash raised from investors is invested in a portfolio of collateral securities or investment contracts. The collateral is then used to support the CDO's obligations on the credit default swaps written to counterparties. The Company's continuing involvement in synthetic CDOs generally includes purchasing credit protection through credit default swaps with the CDO, owning a portion of the capital structure of the CDO, in the form of both unfunded derivative positions (primarily super senior exposures discussed below) and funded notes, entering into interest-rate swap and total-return swap transactions with the CDO, lending to the CDO, and making a market in those funded notes.

            A collateralized loan obligation (CLO) is substantially similar to the CDO transactions described above, except that the assets owned by the SPE (either cash instruments or synthetic exposures through derivative instruments) are corporate loans and to a lesser extent corporate bonds, rather than asset-backed debt securities.

            CertainConsolidation

            The Company has retained significant portions of the assets"super senior" positions issued by certain CDOs. These positions are referred to as "super senior" because they represent the most senior positions in the CDO and, exposure amounts relateat the time of structuring, were senior to CLO warehouses, wherebytranches rated AAA by independent rating agencies. These positions include facilities structured in the form of short-term commercial paper, where the Company provideswrote put options ("liquidity puts") to certain CDOs. Under the terms of the liquidity puts, if the CDO was unable to issue commercial paper at a rate below a specified maximum (generally LIBOR + 35bps to LIBOR + 40 bps), the Company


    was obligated to fund the senior financingtranche of the CDO at a specified interest rate. As of March 31, 2009, the Company had purchased all $25 billion of the commercial paper subject to these liquidity puts.

            Since inception of many CDO transactions, the subordinate tranches of the CDOs have diminished significantly in value and in rating. The declines in value of the subordinate tranches and in the super senior tranches indicate that the super senior tranches are now exposed to a significant portion of the expected losses of the CDOs, based on current market assumptions. The Company evaluates these transactions for consolidation when reconsideration events occur, as defined in FIN 46(R).

            Upon a reconsideration event, the Company is at risk for consolidation only if the Company owns a majority of either a single tranche or a group of tranches that absorb the remaining risk of the CDO. Due to reconsideration events during 2007 and 2008, the Company has consolidated 33 of the 51 CDOs/CLOs in which the Company holds a majority of the senior interests of the transaction.

            The Company continues to monitor its involvement in unconsolidated VIEs and if the Company were to acquire additional interests in these vehicles or if the CDOs' contractual arrangements were to be changed to reallocate expected losses or residual returns among the various interest holders, the Company may be required to consolidate the CDOs. For cash CDOs, the net result of such consolidation would be to gross up the Company's balance sheet by the current fair value of the subordinate securities held by third parties, which amounts are not considered material. For synthetic CDOs, the net result of such consolidation may reduce the Company's balance sheet by eliminating intercompany derivative receivables and payables in consolidation.

    Cash Flows and Retained Interests

            The following tables summarize selected cash flow information related to CDO and CLO to purchase assetssecuritizations for the three months ended March 31, 2009:

    In billions of dollarsCDOsCLOs
    Cash flows received on retained interests

            The key assumptions, used for the securitization of CDOs and CLOs during the warehouse period.three months ended March 31, 2009, in measuring the fair value of retained interests at the date of sale or securitization, are as follows:


    CDOsCLOs
    Discount rate43.3% to 47.2%5.5% to 6.0%

            The senior financingeffect of two negative changes in discount rates used to determine the fair value of retained interests is repaid upon issuance of notes to third-parties.disclosed below.


    In millions of dollars CDOs CLOs 
    Carrying value of retained interests $236 $1,043 
    Discount rates       
     Adverse change of 10% $(26)$(17)
     Adverse change of 20%  (50) (33)
          

    Asset-Based Financing

            The Company provides loans and other forms of financing to VIEs that hold assets. Those loans are subject to the same credit approvals as all other loans originated or purchased by the Company, and related loan loss reserves are reported as part of the Company's Allowance for credit losses. FinancingCompany. Financings in the form of debt securities or derivatives is,are, in most circumstances, reported inTrading account assets and accounted for at fair value through earnings.

            The primary types of asset-based financing, total assets of the unconsolidated VIEs with significant involvement and the Company's maximum exposure to loss at March 31, 2009 are shown below. For the Company to realize that maximum loss, the VIE (borrower) would have to default with no recovery from the assets held by the VIE.

    In billions of dollars
    Type
     Total
    assets
     Maximum
    exposure
     
    Commercial and other real estate $48.4 $9.1 
    Hedge funds and equities  15.9  6.5 
    Corporate loans  7.4  6.3 
    Airplanes, ships and other assets  14.2  2.9 
          
    Total $85.9 $24.8 
          

            The following table summarizes selected cash flow information related to asset-based financing for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008:

     
     Three months ended
    March 31,
     
    In billions of dollars 2009 2008 
    Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows $1.9 $ 
          

            The effect of two negative changes in discount rates used to determine the fair value reported in earnings.of retained interests is disclosed below.

    In millions of dollars Asset based
    financing
     
    Carrying value of retained interests $4,695 
     Value of underlying portfolio    
     Adverse change of 10% $(480)
     Adverse change of 20%  (960)
        

    Municipal Securities Tender Option Bond (TOB) Trusts

            The Company sponsors TOB trusts that hold fixed- and floating-rate, tax-exempt securities issued by state or local municipalities. The trusts are typically single-issuer trusts whose assets are purchased from the Company and from the secondary market. The trusts issue long-term senior floating rate notes ("Floaters")(Floaters) and junior residual securities ("Residuals")(Residuals). The Floaters have a long-term rating based on the long-term rating of the underlying municipal bond and a short-term rating based on that of the liquidity provider to the trust. The Residuals are generally rated based on the long-term rating of the underlying municipal bond and entitle the holder to the residual cash flows from the issuing trust.

            The Company sponsors three kinds of TOB trusts: customer TOB trusts, proprietary TOB trusts and QSPE TOB trusts.

            Credit rating distribution is based on the external rating of the municipal bonds within the TOB trusts, including any credit enhancement provided by monoline insurance companies or the Company in the primary or secondary markets, as discussed below. The total assets for proprietary TOB Trusts (consolidated and non-consolidated) includes $0.4 billion of assets where the Residuals are held by a hedge fund that is consolidated and managed by the Company.

            The TOB trusts fund the purchase of their assets by issuing Floaters along with Residuals, which are frequently less than 1% of a trust's total funding. The tenor of the three categoriesFloaters matches the maturity of the TOB trust and is equal to or shorter than the tenor of the municipal bond held by the trust, and the Floaters bear interest rates that are typically reset weekly to a new market rate (based on the SIFMA index). Floater holders have an option to tender the Floaters they hold back to the trust periodically. Customer TOB trusts issue the Floaters and Residuals to third parties. Proprietary and QSPE TOB trusts issue the Floaters to third parties and the Residuals are held by the Company.

            Approximately $3.4 billion of the municipal bonds owned by TOB trusts have an additional credit guarantee provided by the Company. In all other cases, the assets are either unenhanced or are insured with a monoline insurance provider in the primary market or in the secondary market. While the trusts have not encountered any adverse credit events as defined in the underlying trust agreements, certain monoline insurance companies have experienced downgrades. In these cases, the Company has proactively managed the TOB programs by applying additional secondary market insurance on the assets or proceeding with orderly unwinds of the trusts.

            The Company, in its capacity as remarketing agent, facilitates the sale of the Floaters to third parties at inception of the trust and facilitates the reset of the Floater coupon and tenders of Floaters. If Floaters are tendered and the Company (in its role as remarketing agent) is unable to find a new investor within a specified period of time, it can declare a failed remarketing (in which case the trust is unwound) or may choose to buy the Floaters into its own inventory and may continue to try to sell it to a third-party investor. While the level of the Company's inventory of Floaters fluctuates, the Company held approximately $1.6 billion of Floater inventory related to the Customer, Proprietary and QSPE TOB programs as of March 31, 20082009.

            If a trust is unwound early due to an event other than a credit event on the underlying municipal bond, the underlying municipal bond is sold in the secondary market. If there is an accompanying shortfall in the trust's cash flows to fund the redemption of the Floaters after the sale of the underlying municipal bond, the trust draws on a liquidity agreement in an amount equal to the shortfall. Liquidity agreements are generally provided to the trust directly by the Company. For customer TOBs where the Residual is less than 25% of the trust's capital structure, the Company has a reimbursement agreement with the Residual holder under which the Residual holder reimburses the Company for any payment made under the liquidity arrangement. Through this reimbursement agreement, the Residual holder remains economically exposed to fluctuations in value of the municipal bond. These reimbursement agreements are actively margined based on changes in value of the underlying municipal bond to mitigate the Company's counterparty credit risk. In cases where a third party provides liquidity to a proprietary or QSPE TOB trust, a similar reimbursement arrangement is made whereby the Company (or a consolidated subsidiary of the Company) as Residual holder absorbs any losses incurred by the liquidity provider. As of March 31, 2009, liquidity agreements provided with respect to customer TOB trusts totaled $6.1 billion, offset by reimbursement agreements in place with a notional amount of $4.7 billion. The remaining exposure relates to TOB transactions where the Residual owned by the customer is at least 25% of the bond value at the inception of the transaction. In addition, the Company has provided liquidity arrangements with a notional amount of $5.0 billion to QSPE TOB trusts and Decemberother non-consolidated proprietary TOB trusts described above.


            The Company considers the customer and proprietary TOB trusts (excluding QSPE TOB trusts) to be variable interest entities within the scope of FIN 46(R). Because third-party investors hold the Residual and Floater interests in the customer TOB trusts, the Company's involvement and variable interests include only its role as remarketing agent and liquidity provider. On the basis of the variability absorbed by the customer through the reimbursement arrangement or significant residual investment, the Company does not consolidate the Customer TOB trusts. The Company's variable interests in the Proprietary TOB trusts include the Residual as well as the remarking and liquidity agreements with the trusts. On the basis of the variability absorbed through these contracts (primarily the Residual), the Company generally consolidates the Proprietary TOB trusts. Finally, certain proprietary TOB trusts and QSPE TOB trusts are not consolidated by application of specific accounting literature. For the nonconsolidated proprietary TOB trusts and QSPE TOB trusts, the Company recognizes only its residual investment on its balance sheet at fair value and the third-party financing raised by the trusts is off-balance sheet.

            The following table summarizes selected cash flow information related to municipal bond securitizations for the three months ended March 31, 2007 are as follows:2009 and 2008:

    In billions of dollars

     March 31,
    2008

     December 31,
    2007

    TOB trust type      
    Customer TOB Trusts (Not consolidated) $11.7 $17.6
    Proprietary TOB Trusts (Consolidated and Non- consolidated) $22.9 $22.0
    QSPE TOB Trusts (Not consolidated) $9.8 $10.6
      
     
     
     Three months ended March 31, 
    In billions of dollars 2009 2008 
    Proceeds from new securitizations   $0.1 
    Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows   $0.1 
          

    Municipal Investments

            Municipal investment transactions represent partnerships that finance the construction and rehabilitation of low-income affordable rental housing. The Company generally invests in these partnerships as a limited partner and earns a return primarily through the receipt of tax credits accordedearned from the affordable housing investments made by the partnership.


    Client Intermediation

            Client intermediation transactions represent a range of transactions designed to provide investors with specified returns based on the returns of an underlying security, referenced asset or index. These transactions include credit-linked notes and equity-linked notes. In these transactions, the SPE typically obtains exposure to the underlying security, referenced asset or index through a derivative instrument, such as a total returntotal-return swap or a credit defaultcredit-default swap. In turn the SPE issues notes to investors that pay a return based on the specified underlying security, referenced asset or index. The SPE invests the proceeds in a financial asset or a guaranteed insurance contract (GIC) that serves as collateral for the derivative contract over the term of the transaction.

    The Company's involvement in these transactions includes being the counterparty to the SPE's derivative instruments and investing in a portion of the notes issued by the SPE.

    Other In certain transactions, the investor's maximum risk of loss is limited and the Company absorbs risk of loss above a specified level.

            Other vehicles includeThe Company's maximum risk of loss in these transactions is defined as the Company'samount invested in notes issued by the SPE and the notional amount of any risk of loss absorbed by the Company through a separate instrument issued by the SPE. The derivative instrument held by the Company may generate a receivable from the SPE (for example, where the Company purchases credit protection from the SPE in connection with the SPE's issuance of a credit-linked note), which is collateralized by the assets owned by the SPE. These derivative instruments are not considered variable interests under FIN 46(R) and any associated receivables are not included in entities establishedthe calculation of maximum exposure to facilitate various client financing transactions as well as a variety of investment partnerships.the SPE.

    Structured Investment Vehicles

            Structured Investment Vehicles (SIVs) are SPEs that issue junior notes and senior debt (medium-term notes and short-term commercial paper) to fund the purchase of high-quality assets. The junior notes are subject to the "first loss" risk of the SIVs. The SIVs provide a variable return to junior note holders based on the net spread between the cost to issue the senior debt and the return realized by the high-qualityhigh quality assets. The Company acts as investment manager for the SIVs and, prior to December 13, 2007, was not contractually obligated to provide liquidity facilities or guarantees to the SIVs.

            On December 13, 2007, the Company announced itsAs a result of a commitment to provide support facilities that would resolve uncertainties regarding senior debt ratings facing the Citi-advised SIVs. The Company's commitment was a response to the ratings review for possible downgradeSIVs announced by two rating agencies of the outstanding senior debt of the SIVs, and the continued reduction of liquidity in the SIV-related asset-backed commercial paper and medium-term note markets. These markets are the traditional funding sources for the SIVs. The Company's actions are designed to support the SIVs' senior debt ratings and to allow the SIVs to continue to pursue their asset reduction plan. As a result of this commitment, the Companyon December 13, 2007, Citigroup became the SIVs' primary beneficiary and began consolidating these entities.

            On February 12, 2008, Citigroup finalizedIn order to complete the termswind-down of the support facilities, which takeSIVs, the formCompany purchased the remaining assets of a commitment to provide $3.5 billion of mezzanine capital to the SIVs inat fair value, with a trade date of November 18, 2008. The Company funded the eventpurchase of the market value of their juniorSIV assets by assuming the obligation to pay amounts due under the medium-term notes approaches zero. At March 31, 2008, $3.4 billion has been drawn in aggregateissued by the SIVs, underas the support facilities.medium-term notes mature. The net funding provided by the Company to fund the purchase of the SIV assets was $0.3 billion. During the period to November 18, 2008, the Company wrote down $3.3 billion on SIV assets.

            As of March 31, 2009, the carrying amount of the purchased SIV assets was $16.2 billion, of which $16.1 billion is classified as HTM assets.


    Investment Funds

            The Company is the investment manager for certain VIEsinvestment funds that invest in various asset classes including private equity, hedge funds, real estate, fixed income and infrastructure. The Company earns a management fee, which is a percentage of capital under management, and may earn performance fees. In addition, for some of these funds the Company has an ownership interest in the investment funds. As of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 the total amount invested in these funds was $0.5 billion and $0.2 billion, respectively.

            The Company has also established a number of investment funds as opportunities for qualified employees to invest in private equity investments. The Company acts as investment manager to these funds and may provide employees with financing on both a recourse and non-recourse basis for a portion of the employees' investment commitments.

    Certain Fixed Income Funds Managed by Alternative Investments

    Falcon multi-strategy fixed income funds

            On February 20, 2008, the Company entered into a $500 million credit facility with the Falcon multi-strategy fixed income funds (the "Falcon funds") managed by Alternative Investments. As a result of providing this facility, the Company became the primary beneficiary of the Falcon funds and consolidated the assets and liabilities in its Consolidated Balance Sheet. At March 31, 2008, the total assets of the Falcon funds were approximately $4 billion.

    ASTA/MAT municipal funds

            On March 3, 2008, the Company made an equity investment of $661 million (under a $1 billion commitment) which provides for gain sharing with unaffiliated investors, in the Municipal Opportunity Funds (MOFs). The MOFs are funds managed by Alternative Investments that make leveraged investments in tax-exempt municipal bonds and accept investments through feeder funds known as ASTA and MAT. As a result of the Company's equity commitment, the Company became the primary beneficiary of the MOFs and consolidated the assets and liabilities in its Consolidated Balance Sheet. At March 31, 2008, the total assets of the MOFs were approximately $2 billion.

    Trust Preferred Securities

            The Company has raised financing through the issuance of trust preferred securities. In these transactions, the Company forms a statutory business trust and owns all of the voting equity shares of the trust. The trust issues preferred equity securities to third-party investors and invests the gross proceeds in junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures issued by the Company. These trusts have no assets, operations, revenues or cash flows other than those related to the issuance, administration and repayment of the preferred equity securities held by third-party investors. These trusts' obligations are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Company.

            Because the sole asset of the trust is a receivable from the Company, the Company is not permitted to consolidate the trusts under FIN 46-R,46(R), even though the Company owns all of the voting equity shares of the trust, has fully guaranteed the trusts' obligations, and has the right to redeem the preferred securities in certain circumstances. The Company recognizes the subordinated debentures on its balance sheet as long-term liabilities.



    15.    Derivatives Activities
    16.   DERIVATIVES ACTIVITIES

            In the ordinary course of business, Citigroup enters into various types of derivative transactions. These derivative transactions include:

            Citigroup enters into these derivative contracts relating to interest rate, foreign currency, commodity, and other market/credit risks for the following reasons:

            ��A more detailed explanation of Citi's use of and exposure to credit derivatives is provided in Footnote 19—Guarantees.

            Derivatives may expose Citigroup to market, credit or liquidity risks in excess of the amounts recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Market risk on a derivative product is the exposure created by potential fluctuations in interest rates, foreign-exchange rates and other factors and is a function of the type of product, the volume of transactions, the tenor and terms of the agreement, and the underlying volatility. Credit risk is the exposure to loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the transaction where the value of any collateral held is not adequate to cover such losses. The recognition in earnings of unrealized gains on these transactions is subject to management's assessment as to collectibility. Liquidity risk is the potential exposure that arises when the size of the derivative position may not be able to be rapidly adjusted in periods of high volatility and financial stress at a reasonable cost.

            Information pertaining to the volume of derivative activity is provided in the tables below. The notional amounts, for both long and short derivative positions, of Citigroup's derivative instruments as of March 31, 2009 are presented in the table below:


    Notionals

     
     Hedging
    Instruments
    under
    SFAS 133(1)
     Other Derivative Instruments 
    In millions of dollars at March 31, 2009  
     Trading
    Derivatives(2)
     Management
    Hedges(3)
     
    Interest rate contracts          
     Swaps $119,966 $13,903,004 $154,726 
     Futures and forwards    3,262,752  97,827 
     Written options    2,970,815  18,038 
     Purchased options    3,045,784  45,244 
            
    Total interest rate contract notionals $119,966 $23,182,355 $315,835 
            
    Foreign exchange contracts          
     Swaps $29,166 $855,791 $40,307 
     Futures and forwards  33,536  1,824,123  30,756 
     Written options  1,329  435,205  7,929 
     Purchased options  6,258  474,608   
            
    Total foreign exchange contract notionals $70,289 $3,589,727 $78,992 
            
    Equity contracts          
     Swaps $ $73,126 $ 
     Futures and forwards    14,060   
     Written options    470,176   
     Purchased options    442,612   
            
    Total equity contract notionals $ $999,974 $ 
            
    Commodity and other contracts          
     Swaps $ $22,516 $ 
     Futures and forwards    72,103   
     Written options    29,722   
     Purchased options    33,303   
            
    Total commodity and other contract notionals $ $157,644 $ 
            
    Credit derivatives(4)          
     Citigroup as the Guarantor $ $1,406,131 $ 
     Citigroup as the Beneficiary  6,321  1,537,176   
            
    Total credit derivatives $6,321 $2,943,307 $ 
            
    Total derivative notionals $196,576 $30,873,007 $394,827 
            

    (1)
    Derivatives in hedge accounting relationships accounted for under SFAS 133 are recorded in either Other assets/liabilities or Trading account assets/liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

    (2)
    Trading derivatives include include proprietary positions, as well as certain derivative instruments that qualify for hedge accounting in accordance with SFAS No. 133,Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 133), and are recorded in Trading account assets/liabilities on the Consolidated Balance sheet.

    (3)
    Management hedges represent derivative instruments used in certain economic hedging relationships that are identified for management purposes, but for which SFAS 133 hedge accounting is not applied. These derivatives are recorded in Other assets/liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

    (4)
    Credit derivatives are arrangements designed to allow one party (the "beneficiary") to transfer the credit risk of a "reference asset" to another party (the "guarantor"). These arrangements allow a guarantor to assume the credit risk associated with the reference asset without directly purchasing it. The Company has entered into credit derivatives positions for purposes such as risk management, yield enhancement, reduction of credit concentrations and diversification of overall risk.

    Mark-to-Market (MTM) Receivables/Payables

     
     Derivative instruments designated as
    SFAS 133 hedges
     Other derivative instruments 
    In millions of dollars at March 31, 2009 Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities 
    Derivatives classified in Trading account assets/liabilities             
     Interest rate contracts $553 $1,785 $614,499 $593,399 
     Foreign exchange contracts  829  523  105,416  113,762 
     Equity contracts      31,061  49,126 
     Commodity and other contracts      26,582  24,832 
     Credit derivatives      237,819  212,786 
              
    Total derivatives in Trading account assets/liabilities(1) $1,382 $2,308 $1,015,377 $993,905 
              
    Derivatives classified in Other assets/liabilities             
     Interest rate contracts $6,479 $3,303 $3,599 $1,767 
     Foreign exchange contracts  2,869  2,448  1,984  1,161 
     Credit derivatives  1,597       
              
    Total Derivatives in Other Assets / Liabilities(2) $10,945 $5,751 $5,583 $2,928 
              

    (1)
    These trading derivative assets do not include cash collateral paid with respect to SFAS 133 hedges and Other derivative instruments of $65,165 million as of March 31, 2009. The cash collateral received, totals $61,740 million as of March 31, 2009 and it is not included in the trading derivative liabilities shown here.

    (2)
    Other assets exclude cash collateral paid with respect to SFAS 133 hedges and other derivative instruments of $1,111 million. The cash collateral received, not included in the derivatives classified in Other liabilities, totals $2,526 million as of March 31, 2009.

            All derivatives are reported on the balance sheet at fair value. The balances presented in the table above are reported gross, prior to counterparty netting and cash collateral netting in accordance with existing master netting agreements, as well as market valuation adjustment. The effect from these items on the gross derivative assets and liabilities was a reduction of $986,064 million and $976,815 million, respectively. Within these balances, the amount of payables in respect of cash collateral received that was netted with unrealized gains from derivative was $48,937 million, while the amount of receivables in respect of cash collateral paid that was netted with unrealized losses from derivatives was $56,376 million as of March 31, 2009.

            The trading derivatives fair values are presented in Note 9—Trading Account Assets and Liabilities.

            The amounts recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 related to derivatives not designated in a qualifying SFAS 133 hedging relationship are shown in the table below:

     
     Non-designated
    derivatives(1)—gains (losses)
     
    In millions of dollars for the three months ended March 31, 2009 Principal
    transactions
     Other
    revenues
     
     Interest rate contracts $6,155 $228 
     Foreign exchange contracts  250  996 
     Equity contracts  (85)  
     Commodity and other contracts  337   
     Credit derivatives  338   
          
    Total gain (loss) on non-designated derivatives(1) $6,995 $1,224 
          

    (1)
    Non-designated derivatives are derivative instruments not designated in qualifying SFAS 133 hedging relationships.

    Accounting for Derivative Hedging

            Citigroup accounts for its hedging activityactivities in accordance with SFAS 133. As a general rule, SFAS 133 hedge accounting is permitted for those situations where the Company is exposed to a particular risk, such as interest rateinterest-rate or foreign-exchange risk, that causes changes in the fair value of an asset or liability, or variability in the expected future cash flows of an existing asset, liability or a forecasted transaction that may affect earnings.

            Derivative contracts hedging the risks associated with the changes in fair value are referred to asfair value hedges,, while contracts hedging the risks affecting the expected future cash flows are calledcash flow hedges.hedges. Hedges that utilize derivatives or debt instruments to manage the foreign exchange risk associated with equity investments in non-U.S. dollar functional currency foreign subsidiaries (net investment in a foreign operation) are callednet investment hedges.

            All derivatives are reported on the balance sheet at fair value. In addition, where applicable, all such contracts covered by master netting agreements are reported net. Gross positive fair values are netted with gross negative fair values by counterparty pursuant to a valid master netting agreement. In addition payables and receivables in respect of cash collateral received from or paid to a given counterparty is included in this netting. However, non-cash collateral is not included.

            As of March 31, 2008, and December 31, 2007, the amount of payables in respect of cash collateral received that was netted with unrealized gains from derivatives was $45 billion and $37 billion, respectively, while the amount of receivables in respect of cash collateral paid that was netted with unrealized losses from derivatives was $36 billion and $26 billion, respectively.hedges.

            If certain hedging criteria specified in SFAS 133 are met, including testing for hedge effectiveness, special hedge accounting may be applied. The hedge-effectivenesshedge effectiveness assessment methodologies for similar hedges are performed in a similar manner and are used consistently throughout the hedging relationships. For fair-valuefair value hedges, the changes in value of the hedging derivative, as well as the changes in value of the related hedged item due to the risk being hedged, are reflected in current earnings. For cash-flowcash flow hedges and net-investmentnet investment hedges, the changes in value of the hedging derivative are reflected in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in Citigroup's stockholders' equity, to the extent


    the hedge wasis effective. Hedge ineffectiveness, in either case, is reflected in current earnings.

            Continuing with the example referred to above, for Asset/Liability Management Hedging,For asset/liability management hedging, the fixed-rate long-term debt may be recorded at amortized cost under current U.S. GAAP. However, by electing to use SFAS 133 hedge accounting, the carrying value of this notethe debt is adjusted for changes in the benchmark interest rate, with any such changes in value recorded in current earnings. The related interest-rate swap is also recorded on the balance sheet at fair value, with any changes in fair value reflected in earnings. Thus, any ineffectiveness resulting from the hedging relationship is recorded in current earnings. Alternatively, an economic hedge, which does not meet the SFAS 133 hedging criteria, would involve only recording the derivative at fair value on the balance sheet, with its associated changes in fair


    value recorded in earnings. The debt would continue to be carried at amortized cost and, therefore, current earnings would be impacted only by the interest rate shifts and other factors that cause the change in the swap's value and the underlying yield of the debt. This type of hedge is undertaken when SFAS 133 hedge requirements cannot be achieved or management decides not to apply SFAS 133 hedge accounting. Another alternative for the Company would be to elect to carry the notedebt at fair value under SFAS 159. Once the irrevocable election is made upon issuance of the note,debt, the full change in fair value of the notedebt would be reported in earnings. The related interest rate swap, with changes in fair value also reflected in earnings, provides a natural offset to the note'sdebt's fair value change. To the extent the two offsets would not be exactly equal, the difference would be reflected in current earnings. This type of economic hedge is undertaken when the Company prefers to follow this simpler method that achieves generally similar financial statement results to an SFAS 133 fair-value hedge.

            Key aspects of achieving SFAS 133 hedge accounting are documentation of hedging strategy and hedge effectiveness at the hedge inception and substantiating hedge effectiveness on an ongoing basis. A derivative must be highly effective in accomplishing the hedge objective of offsetting either changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item for the risk being hedged. Any ineffectiveness in the hedge relationship is recognized in current earnings. The assessment of effectiveness excludes changes in the value of the hedged item that are unrelated to the risks being hedged. Similarly, the assessment of effectiveness may exclude changes in the fair value of a derivative related to time value that, if excluded, are recognized in current earnings.

    Fair-valueFair value hedges

            Citigroup also hedges exposure to changes in the fair value of fixed-rate assets, including available-for-sale debt securities and interbank placements.loans. The hedging instruments mainly used are receive-variable, pay-fixed interest rate swaps for the remaining hedged asset categories.swaps. Most of these fair-value hedging relationships use dollar-offset ratio analysis to assessdetermine whether the hedging relationships are highly effective at inception and on an ongoing basis, while certain others use regression analysis.

            For a limited number of fair-value hedges of benchmark interest-rate risk, Citigroup uses the "shortcut" method as SFAS 133 allows the Company to assume no ineffectiveness if the hedging relationship involves an interest-bearing financial asset or liability and an interest-rate swap. In order to assume no ineffectiveness, Citigroup ensures that all the shortcut method requirements of SFAS 133 for these types of hedging relationships are met. The amount of shortcut method hedges that Citigroup uses is de minimis.


            The following table summarizes certain information related to the Company's fair value hedges for the quarter ended March 31, 2009:

    In millions of dollars for the three months ended March 31, 2009 Principal
    Transactions
     Other
    Revenue
     
    Gain (loss) on fair value designated and qualifying hedges       
     Interest rate contracts $456 $(2,199)
     Foreign exchange contracts  117  (145)
          
    Total gain (loss) on fair value designated and qualifying hedges $573 $(2,344)
          
    Gain (loss) on the hedged item in designated and qualifying fair value hedges       
     Interest rate hedges $(449)$2,444 
     Foreign exchange hedges  155  288 
          
    Total gain (loss) on the hedged item in designated and qualifying fair value hedge $(294)$2,732 
          
    Hedge ineffectiveness recognized in earnings on designated and qualifying fair value hedges       
     Interest rate hedges $81 $255 
     Foreign exchange hedges  11  137 
          
    Total hedge ineffectiveness recognized in earnings on designated and qualifying fair value hedges $92 $392 
          
    Net gain (loss) excluded from assessment of the effectiveness of fair value hedges       
     Interest rate contracts $(74)$(10)
     Foreign exchange contracts  261  6 
          
    Total net gain/(loss) excluded from assessment of the effectiveness of fair value hedges $187 $(4)
          

    Cash-flowCash flow hedges

    Citigroup also hedges variable cash flows resulting from investments in floating-rate available-for-sale debt securities. Variable cash flows from those assets are converted to fixed-rate cash flows by entering into receive-fixed,receive fixed, pay-variable interest rateinterest-rate swaps. These cash-flow hedging relationships use either regression analysis prospectively and or dollar-offset ratio analysis retrospectively to assess whether the hedging relationships are highly effective at inception and on an ongoing basis. Since efforts are made to align the terms of the derivatives to those of the hedged forecasted cash flows as closely as possible, the amount of hedge ineffectiveness is not significant.

            Citigroup is currently not using The hedge ineffectiveness on the shortcut methodcash flow hedges recognized in earnings totals $4 million for any cash-flow hedging relationships.

    the three months ended March 31, 2009.
    Hedging of foreign exchange risk—Citigroup locks in the functional currency equivalent of cash flows of various balance sheet liability exposures, including deposits, short-term borrowings and long-term debt (and the forecasted issuances or rollover of such items) that are denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of the issuing entity. Depending on the risk managementrisk-management objectives, these types of hedges are designated as either cash-flow hedges of only foreign exchange risk or cash-flow hedges of both foreign exchangeforeign-exchange and interest-rateinterest rate risk, and the hedging instruments used are foreign-exchange forward contracts, cross-currency swaps and foreign-currency options. For some hedges, Citigroup matches all terms of the hedged item and the hedging derivative at inception and on an ongoing basis to eliminate hedge ineffectiveness. Citigroup does not exclude any terms from consideration when applying the matched terms method. To the extent all terms are not perfectly matched, any ineffectiveness is measured using the "hypothetical derivative method" from FASB Derivative Implementation Group Issue G7. Efforts are made to match up the terms of the hypothetical and actual derivatives used as closely as possible. As a result, the amount of hedge ineffectiveness is not significant even when the terms do not match perfectly.

            The change in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) from cash flow hedges for the three months ended March 31, 2009 is presented below:

    In millions of dollars Three months
    ended
    March 31, 2009
     
    Effective portion of cash flow hedges included in AOCI, pretax    
     Interest rate contracts $168 
     Foreign exchange contracts  400 
     Credit derivatives  1,493 
        
    Total Effective portion of cash flow hedges included in AOCI, pretax $2,061 
        
    Effective portion of cash flow hedges reclassified from AOCI to Earnings    
     Interest rate contracts(1) $412 
     Foreign exchange contracts(2)  86 
     Credit derivatives   
        
    Total effective portion of cash flow hedges reclassified from AOCI to Earnings $(326)
        

    (1)
    The amount reclassified from AOCI, related to interest rate cash flow hedges, to Other revenue and Principal transactions is ($367) million and ($45) million, respectively.

    (2)
    The amount reclassified from AOCI, related to foreign exchange cash flow hedges, to Other Revenue and Principal transactions is $88 million and ($2) million, respectively.

    Hedging the overall        For cash flow hedges, any changes in cash flows—the fair value of the end-user derivative remaining inAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss)In situations where on the contractual rateConsolidated Balance Sheet will be included in earnings of a variable-rate asset or liability is not a benchmark rate, Citigroup designatesfuture periods to offset the riskvariability of overall changes inthe hedged cash flows as the hedged risk. Citigroup primarily hedges variability in the totalwhen such cash flows related to non-benchmark-rate-based liabilities, such as customer deposits, and uses receive-variable, pay-fixed interest rate swaps as the hedging instrument. Theseaffect earnings. The net loss associated with cash flow hedging relationships use either regression analysis or dollar-offset ratio analysishedges expected to assess effectiveness at inception andbe reclassified fromAccumulated other comprehensive income within 12 months of March 31, 2009 is approximately $2.2 billion.

            The impact of cash flow hedges on an ongoing basis.AOCI is also included within Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Changes in Accumulated Comprehensive Income (Loss).

    Net investment hedges

            Consistent with SFAS No. 52, "ForeignForeign Currency Translation"Translation (SFAS 52), SFAS 133 allows hedging of the foreign-currency risk of a net investment in a foreign operation. Citigroup primarily uses foreign-currency forwards, options and swaps and foreign-currency-denominated debt instruments to manage the foreign-exchange risk associated with Citigroup's equity investments in several non-U.S. dollar functional currency foreign subsidiaries. In accordance with SFAS 52, Citigroup records the change in the carrying amount of these investments in the cumulativeCumulative translation adjustment account withinAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Simultaneously, the effective portion of the hedge of this exposure is also recorded in the cumulativeCumulative translation adjustment account and the ineffective portion, if any, is immediately recorded in earnings.

            For derivatives used in net-investmentnet investment hedges, Citigroup follows the forward rateforward-rate method from FASB Derivative Implementation Group Issue H8.H8, "Foreign Currency Hedges: Measuring the Amount of Ineffectiveness in a Net Investment Hedge." According to that method, all changes in fair value, including changes related to the forward rateforward-rate component of the foreign-currency forward contracts and the time valuetime-value of foreign currencyforeign-currency options, are recorded in the cumulativeCumulative translation adjustment account. For foreign- currency-denominatedforeign-currency denominated debt instruments that are designated as hedges of net investments, the translation gain or loss that is recorded in the cumulative translation adjustment account is based on the spot exchange rate between the functional currency of the respective subsidiary and the U.S. dollar, which is the functional currency of Citigroup. To the extent the notional amount of the hedging instrument exactly matches the hedged net investment and the underlying exchange rate of the derivative hedging instrument relates to the exchange rate between the functional currency of the net investment and Citigroup's functional currency (or, in the case of thea non-derivative debt instrument, such instrument is denominated in the functional currency of the net investment), no ineffectiveness is recorded in earnings.

            Key aspects of achieving SFAS 133 hedge accounting are documentation of hedging strategy and hedge effectiveness at the hedge inception and substantiating hedge effectiveness on an ongoing basis. A derivative must be highly effective in accomplishing the hedge objective of offsetting either changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item for the risk being hedged. Any ineffectiveness in the hedge relationship is recognized in current earnings. The assessment of effectiveness excludes changes in the value of the hedged item that are unrelated to the risks being hedged. Similarly, the assessment of effectiveness may exclude changes in the fair value of a derivative related to time value that, if excluded, are recognized in current earnings.

            The following table summarizes certain information related to the Company's hedging activitiesnet investment hedges for the quarter ended March 31, 2009:

    Net Investments Hedges(1)
    In millions of dollars
     Three months ended
    March 31, 2009
     
    Pretax gain included in FX translation adjustment with AOCI $539 
    Gain on hedge ineffectiveness on net investment hedges included in Other revenue  9 
        

    (1)
    No amount, related to the effective portion of net investment hedges, was reclassed from AOCI to earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007:

     
     First Quarter
     
    In millions of dollars
     2008
     2007
     
    Fair value hedges       
    Hedge ineffectiveness recognized in earnings $49 $17 
    Net gain (loss) excluded from assessment of effectiveness  117  82 
    Cash flow hedges       
    Hedge ineffectiveness recognized in earnings  (10)  
    Net gain (loss) excluded from assessment of effectiveness  (6)  
    Net investment hedges       
    Net gain (loss) included in foreign currency translation adjustment within Accumulated other comprehensive income $(166)$(23)
      
     
     

            For cash-flow hedges, any changes in2009. Additionally, no amount was excluded from the fair valueassessment of the end-user derivative remaining in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on the Consolidated Balance Sheet will be included in earnings of future periods to offset the variabilityeffectiveness of the hedged cash flows when such cash flows affects earnings.

            The change in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) from cash-flownet investment hedges forduring the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 can be summarized as follows (after-tax):2009.

    Credit-Risk-Related Contingent Features in Derivatives

    In millions of dollars
     2008
     2007
     
    Beginning balance, January 1 $(3,163)$(61)
    Net gain (loss) from cash flow hedges  (1,833) (347)
    Net amounts reclassified to earnings  195  (92)
      
     
     
    Ending balance, March 31 $(4,801)$(500)
      
     
     

            Derivatives may expose CitigroupCertain derivative instruments contain provisions that require the Company to market,either post additional collateral or immediately settle any outstanding liability balances upon the occurrence of a specified credit or liquidity risksrisk-related event. These events, which are defined by the existing derivative contracts, are primarily downgrades in excessthe credit rating of the amounts recorded onCompany and its affiliates. The fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that are in a liability position at March 31, 2009 is $27 billion. The Company has posted $18 billion as collateral for this exposure in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Market risk on a derivative product isnormal course of business as of March 31, 2009. Each downgrade would trigger additional collateral requirements for the exposure created by potential fluctuations in interest rates, foreign-exchange ratesCompany and other values, and is a function of the type of product, the volume of transactions, the tenor and terms of the agreement, and the underlying volatility. Credit risk is the exposure to lossits affiliates. However, in the event that each legal entity was downgraded to below investment grade credit rating as of nonperformance byMarch 31, 2009, the other partyCompany would be required to the transaction where the valuepost additional collateral of any collateral held is not adequateup to cover such losses. The recognition in earnings of unrealized gains on these transactions is subject to management's assessment as to collectibility. Liquidity risk is the potential exposure that arises when the size of the derivative position may not be able to be rapidly adjusted in periods of high volatility and financial stress at a reasonable cost.$10 billion.



    16.    Fair Value17.   FAIR-VALUE MEASUREMENT (SFAS 155, SFAS 156, SFAS 157, and SFAS 159)
    157)

            Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted SFAS 157 and SFAS 159. Both standards address aspects of the expanding application of fair-value accounting.157. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure requirements about fair-value measurements. SFAS 157, among other things, requires the Company to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. In addition, SFAS 157 precludes the use of block discounts when measuring the fair value of instruments traded in an active market, which discounts were previously applied to large holdings of publicly traded equity securities. It also requires recognition of trade-date gains related to certain derivative transactions whose fair value has been determined using unobservable market inputs. This guidance supersedes the guidance in Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 02-3, "Issues Involved in Accounting for Derivative Contracts Held for Trading Purposes and Contracts Involved in Energy Trading and Risk Management Activities" (EITF Issue 02-3), which prohibited the recognition of trade-date gains for such derivative transactions when determining the fair value of instruments not traded in an active market.

            As a result of the adoption of SFAS 157, the Company has made some amendments to the techniques used in measuring the fair value of derivative and other positions. These amendments change the way that the probability of default of a counterparty is factored into the valuation of derivative positions, include for the first time the impact of Citigroup's own credit risk on derivatives and other liabilities measured at fair value, and also eliminate the portfolio servicing adjustment that is no longer necessary under SFAS 157.

            Under SFAS 159, the Company may elect to report most financial instruments and certain other items at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis with changes in fair value reported in earnings. After the initial adoption, the election is made at the acquisition of an eligible financial asset, financial liability, or firm commitment or when certain specified reconsideration events occur. The fair value election may not be revoked once an election is made.

            Additionally, the transition provisions of SFAS 159 permit a one-time election for existing positions at the adoption date with a cumulative-effect adjustment included in opening retained earnings and future changes in fair value reported in earnings.

            The Company also has elected the fair value accounting provisions permitted under FASB Statement No. 155, "Accounting for certain Hybrid Financial Instruments" (SFAS 155), and FASB Statement No 156, "Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets" (SFAS 156) for certain assets and liabilities. In accordance with SFAS 155, which was primarily adopted on a prospective basis, hybrid financial instruments—such as structured notes containing embedded derivatives that otherwise would require bifurcation, as well as certain interest-only instruments—may be accounted for at fair value if the Company makes an irrevocable election to do so on an instrument-by-instrument basis. The changes in fair value are recorded in current earnings. Additional discussion regarding the applicable areas in which SFAS 155 was adopted is presented below.

            SFAS 156 requires all servicing rights to be initially recognized at fair value. At its initial adoption, the standard permits a one-time irrevocable election to re-measure each class of servicing rights at fair value, with the changes in fair value recorded in current earnings. The classes of servicing rights are identified based on the availability of market inputs used in determining their fair values and the methods for managing their risks. The Company has elected fair-value accounting for its mortgage and student loan classes of servicing rights. The impact of adopting this standard was not material. See Note 14 on page 80 for further discussions regarding the accounting and reporting of mortgage servicing rights.

    Fair-Value Hierarchy

            SFAS 157 specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company's market assumptions. These two types of inputs have created the following fair-value hierarchy:

            This hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available. The Company considers relevant and observable market prices in its valuations where possible. The frequency of transactions, the size of the bid-ask spread and the amount of adjustment necessary when comparing similar transactions are all factors in determining the liquidity of markets and the relevance of observed prices in those markets.

    Determination of Fair Value

            For assets and liabilities carried at fair value, the Company measures such value using the procedures set out below, irrespective of whether these assets and liabilities are carried at fair value as a result of an election under SFAS 159, SFASFASB Statement No. 155,Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments (SFAS 155), or SFASFASB Statement No. 156,Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets (SFAS 156), or whether they were previously carried at fair value.

            When available, the Company generally uses quoted market prices to determine fair value and classifies such items in Level 1. In some cases where a market price is available, the Company will make use of acceptable practical expedients (such as matrix pricing) to calculate fair value, in which case the items are classified in Level 2.

            If quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based upon internally developed valuation techniques that use, where possible, current market-based or independently sourced market parameters, such as interest rates, currency rates, option volatilities, etc. Items valued using such internally generated valuation techniques are classified according to the lowest level input or value driver that is significant to the valuation. Thus, an item may be classified


    in Level 3 even though there may be some significant inputs that are readily observable.

            Where available, the Company may also make use of quoted prices for recent trading activity in positions with the same or similar characteristics to that being valued. The frequency and size of transactions and the amount of the bid-ask spread are among the factors considered in determining the liquidity of markets and the relevance of observed prices from those markets. If relevant and observable prices are available, those valuations would be classified as Level 2. If prices are not available, other valuation techniques would be used and the item would be classified as Level 3.

            Fair-value estimates from internal valuation techniques are verified, where possible, to prices obtained from independent vendors or brokers. Vendors and brokers' valuations may be based on a variety of inputs ranging from observed prices to proprietary valuation models.

            The following section describes the valuation methodologies used by the Company to measure various financial instruments at fair value, including an indication of the level in the fair valuefair-value hierarchy in which each instrument is generally classified. Where appropriate, the description includes details of the valuation models, the key inputs to those models as well as any significant assumptions.

    Securities purchased under agreements to resell &and securities sold under agreements to repurchase

            No quoted prices exist for such instruments and so fair value is determined using a discounted cash-flow technique. Cash flows are estimated based on the terms of the contract, taking into account any embedded derivative or other features. Expected cash flows are discounted using market rates appropriate to the maturity of the instrument as well as the nature and amount of collateral taken or received. Generally, such instruments are classified within Level 2 of the fair-value hierarchy as the inputs used in the fair valuation are readily observable.


    Trading Account Assets—Assets and Liabilities—Trading Securities and Trading Loans

            When available, the Company uses quoted market prices to determine the fair value of trading securities; such items are classified in Level 1 of the fair-value hierarchy. Examples include some government securities and exchange-traded equity securities.

            For bonds and secondary market loans traded over the counter, the Company generally determines fair value utilizing internal valuation techniques. Fair valuesFair-value estimates from internal valuation techniques are verified, where possible, to prices obtained from independent vendors. Vendors compile prices from various sources and may apply matrix pricing for similar bonds or loans where no price is observable. If available, the Company may also use quoted prices for recent trading activity of assets with similar characteristics to the bond or loan being valued. Trading securities and loans priced using such methods are generally classified as Level 2. However, when less liquidity exists for a security or loan, a quoted price is stale or prices from independent sources vary, a loan or security is generally classified as Level 3.

            Where the Company's principal market for a portfolio of loans is the securitization market, the Company uses the securitization price to determine the fair value of the portfolio. The securitization price is determined from the assumed proceeds of a hypothetical securitization in the current market, adjusted for transformation costs (i.e., direct costs other than transaction costs) and securitization uncertainties such as market conditions and liquidity. As a result of the severe reduction in the level of activity in certain securitization markets insince the second half of 2007, which continues through the first quarter of 2008, observable securitization prices for certain directly comparable portfolios of loans have not been readily available. Therefore, such portfolios of loans are generally classified withinin Level 3 of the fair valuefair-value hierarchy. However, for other loan securitization markets, such as those related to conforming prime fixed ratefixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate mortgage loans, pricing verification of the hypothetical securitizations has been possible, since these markets have remained active. Accordingly, these loan portfolios are classified as Level 2 withinin the fair valuefair-value hierarchy.

    Trading Account Assets and Liabilities—Derivatives

            Exchange-traded derivatives are generally fair valued using quoted market (i.e., exchange) prices and so are classified withinin Level 1 of the fair-value hierarchy.

            The majority of derivatives entered into by the Company are executed over the counter and so are valued using internal valuation techniques as no quoted market prices exist for such instruments. The valuation techniques and inputs depend on the type of derivative and the nature of the underlying.underlying instrument. The principal techniques used to value these instruments are discounted cash flows, Black-Scholes and Monte Carlo simulation. The fair values of derivative contracts reflect cash the Company has paid or received (for example, option premiums paid and received).

            The key inputs depend upon the type of derivative and the nature of the underlying instrument and include interest rate yield curves, foreign-exchange rates, the spot price of the underlying volatility and correlation. The item is placed in either Level 2 or Level 3 depending on the observability of the significant inputs to the model. Correlation and items with longer tenors are generally less observable.

    Subprime-Related Direct Exposures in CDOs

            The Company accounts for its CDO super senior subprime direct exposures and the underlying securities on a fair-value basis with all changes in fair value recorded in earnings. Citigroup's CDO super senior subprime direct exposures are not subject to valuation based on observable transactions. Accordingly, the fair value of these exposures is based on management's best estimates based on facts and circumstances as of the date of these consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements.

            Citigroup's CDO super senior subprime direct exposures $22.7 billion at March 31, 2008, are Level 3 assets. The valuation of the high-grade and mezzanine ABS CDO positions uses trader prices based on the underlying assets of each high-grade and mezzanine ABS CDO. Unlike the ABCP- and CDO-squared positions, the high-grade and mezzanine positions are now largely hedged through the ABX and bond short positions, which are, by necessity, trader priced. This results in closer symmetry in the way these long and short positions are valued by the Company. Citigroup intends to use trader marks to value this portion of the portfolio going forward so long as it remains largely hedged.

            The valuation of the ABCP and CDO-squared positions are subject to valuation based on significant unobservable inputs. Accordingly, fairFair value of these exposures is based on estimates of the future cash flows from the mortgage loans underlying the assets of the ABS CDOs. To determine the performance of the underlying mortgage loan portfolios, , the Company estimates the prepayments, defaults and loss severityseverities based on a number of macro-economicmacroeconomic factors, including housing price changes, unemployment rates, and interest rates and borrower and loan attributes, such as age, credit scores, documentation status, loan-to-value (LTV) ratios and debt-to-income (DTI) ratios. The model is calibrated using available mortgage loan information including historical loan performance. In addition, the methodology estimates the impact of geographic concentration of mortgages and the impact of reported fraud in the origination of subprime mortgages. An appropriate discount rate is then applied to the cash flows generated for each super senior ABS CDOABCP and CDO-squared tranche, in order to estimate its fair value under current fair value.market conditions.

            When necessary, the valuation methodology used by Citigroup is refined and the inputs used for the purposes of estimation are modified, in part, to reflect ongoing market developments. More specifically, two refinementsthe inputs of home price appreciation (HPA) assumptions and delinquency data were made


    during the first quarterupdated along with discount rates that are based upon a weighted average combination of 2008: a more direct method of calculating estimated housing-price changesimplied spreads from single name ABS bond prices and a more refined method for calculating the discount rate. During the fourth quarter 2007,ABX indices, as well as CLO spreads under current market conditions.

            The housing-price changes were estimated using a seriesforward-looking projection, which incorporated the Loan Performance Index. In addition, the Company's mortgage default model also uses recent mortgage performance data, a period of factors including projected national housing-price changes. Duringsharp home price declines and high levels of mortgage foreclosures.

            The valuation as of March 31, 2009 assumes a cumulative decline in U.S. housing prices from peak to trough of 33%. This


    rate assumes declines of 9.3% and 3.9% in 2009 and 2010, respectively, the first quarterremainder of 2008 housing-price changes were estimated using a forward looking projection based on the S&P Case-Shiller Home Price Index. This change facilitates a more direct estimation33% decline having already occurred before the end of subprime house price changes. Prior to the first quarter of 2008,2008.

            In addition, the discount rate used was based on observable CLO spreads applicable to the assumed rating of each ABS CDO super senior tranche. During the first quarter of 2008, the discount rate wasrates were based on a weighted average combination of the implied spreads from single namedname ABS bond prices, ABX indices and CLO spreads, depending on vintage and asset types. This refinement was made, in part, in responseTo determine the discount margin, the Company applies the mortgage default model to the combinationbonds underlying the ABX indices and other referenced cash bonds and solves for the discount margin that produces the current market prices of continuing rating agency downgrades of RMBS and ABS CDOs and the absence of observable CLO spreads at the resulting rating levels.those instruments.

            The primary drivers that currently impact the super senior valuations are the discount rates used to calculate the present value of projected cash flows and projected mortgage loan performance.

            Given the above, the Company's CDO super senior subprime direct exposures were classified in Level 3 of the fair-value hierarchy throughout 2007 and the first quarter of 2008.

            For most of the lending and structuring direct subprime exposures (excluding super seniors), fair value is determined utilizing observable transactions where available, other market data for similar assets in markets that are not active and other internal valuation techniques.

    Investments

            The investments category includes available-for-sale debt and marketable equity securities, whose fair value is determined using the same procedures described for trading securities above.above or, in some cases, using vendor prices as the primary source.

            Also included in investments are nonpublic investments in private equity and real estate entities held by theAlternative Investments andSecurities and Banking businesses. S&B business. Determining the fair value of nonpublic securities involves a significant degree of management resources and judgment as no quoted prices exist and such securities are generally very thinly traded. In addition, there may be transfer restrictions on private equity securities. The Company uses an established process for determining the fair value of such securities, using commonly accepted valuation techniques, including the use of earnings multiples based on comparable public securities, industry specificindustry-specific non-earnings-based multiples and discounted cash flow models. In determining the fair value of nonpublic securities, the Company also considers events such as a proposed sale of the investee company, initial public offerings, equity issuances, or other observable transactions.

            Private equity securities are generally classified in Level 3 of the fair valuefair-value hierarchy.

    Short-Term Borrowings and Long-Term Debt

            TheWhere fair-value accounting has been elected, the fair value of non-structured liabilities is determined by discounting expected cash flows using the appropriate discount rate for the applicable maturity. Such instruments are generally classified in Level 2 of the fair-value hierarchy as all inputs are readily observable.

            The Company determines the fair value of structured liabilities (where performance is linked to structured interest rates, inflation or currency risks) and hybrid financial instruments (performance linked to risks other than interest rates, inflation or currency risks) using the appropriate derivative valuation methodology (described above) given the nature of the embedded risk profile. Such instruments are classified in Level 2 or Level 3 depending on the observability of significant inputs to the model.

    Market Valuation Adjustments

    such offset exists) with a counterparty through arrangements such as netting agreements.

    Auction Rate Securities

            Auction rate securities (ARS) are long-term municipal bonds, corporate bonds, securitizations and preferred stocks with interest rates or dividend yields that are reset through periodic auctions. The coupon paid in the current period is based on the rate determined by the prior auction. In the event of an auction failure, ARS holders receive a "fail rate" coupon, which is specified by the original issue documentation of each ARS.

            Where insufficient orders to purchase all of the ARS issue to be sold in an auction were received, the primary dealer or auction agent would traditionally have purchased any residual unsold inventory (without a contractual obligation to do so). This residual inventory would then be repaid through subsequent auctions, typically in a short timeframe. Due to this auction mechanism and generally liquid market, ARS have historically traded and were valued as short-term instruments.

            Citigroup acted in the capacity of primary dealer for approximately $72 billion of ARS and continued to purchase residual unsold inventory in support of the auction mechanism until mid-February 2008. After this date, liquidity in the ARS market deteriorated significantly, auctions failed due to a lack of bids from third-party investors, and Citigroup ceased to purchase unsold inventory. Following a number of ARS refinancings, at March 31, 2009, Citigroup continued to act in the capacity of primary dealer for approximately $35 billion of outstanding ARS.

    The Company classifies its auction rate securities (ARS)ARS as held-to-maturity, available-for-sale and trading securities and accounts for them on a fair-value basis with all changes in fair value recorded in earnings.securities.

            Prior to our first auctionauction's failing in the first quarter of 2008, Citigroup valued ARS based on observation of auction market prices, because the auctions had a short maturity period (7, 28


    and 35 days). This generally resulted in valuations at par. Once the auctions failed, ARS could no longer be valued using observation of auction market prices. Accordingly, the fair value of ARS is currently estimated using internalinternally developed discounted cash flow valuation techniques that incorporatespecific to the specific characteristicsnature of the assets underlying each ARS.

            For ARS with U.S. municipal securities as underlying assets, future cash flows are estimated based on the terms of the securities underlying each individual ARS and discounted at an estimated discount rate in order to estimate the current fair value. The key assumptions that impact the ARS valuations are estimated prepayments and take into accountrefinancings, estimated fail rate coupons (i.e., the rate paid in the event of auction failure, which varies according to the current credit rating of the issuer) and the discount rate used to calculate the present value of projected cash flows. The discount rate used for each ARS is based on rates observed for straight issuances of other municipal securities. In order to arrive at the appropriate discount rate, these observed rates were adjusted upward to factor in the specifics of the ARS structure being valued, such as callability, and the illiquidity in the ARS market.


            For ARS with student loans as underlying assets, future cash flows are estimated based on the terms of the loans underlying each individual ARS, discounted at an appropriate rate in order to estimate the current fair value. The key assumptions that impact the ARS inventory was movedvaluations are the expected weighted average life of the structure, estimated fail rate coupons, the amount of leverage in each structure and the discount rate used to Level 3 duringcalculate the present value of projected cash flows. The discount rate used for each ARS is based on rates observed for basic securitizations with similar maturities to the loans underlying each ARS being valued. In order to arrive at the appropriate discount rate, these observed rates were adjusted upward to factor in the specifics of the ARS structure being valued, such as callability, and the illiquidity in the ARS market.

            During the first quarter of 2008, asARS for which the entire auction rate security marketauctions failed and where no secondary market developed.has developed were moved to Level 3, as the assets were subject to valuation using significant unobservable inputs. For ARS which are subject to SFAS 157 classification, the majority continue to be classified in Level 3.

    Alt-A Mortgage Securities

            The Company reportsclassifies its Alt-A mortgage securities inas Held-to-Maturity, Available-for-Sale, and Trading account assetsinvestments. The securities classified as trading and available-for-sale Investments. In both cases the securities are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value reported in current earnings and OCI,AOCI, respectively. For these purposes, Alt-A mortgage securities are non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) where:where (1) the underlying collateral has weighted average FICO scores between 680 and 720 or (2) for instances where FICO scores are greater than 720, RMBS have 30% or less of the underlying collateral comprisedcomposed of full documentation loans.

            Similar to the valuation methodologies used for other Tradingtrading securities and Tradingtrading loans, the Company generally determines the fair value of Alt-A mortgage securities utilizing internal valuation techniques. Fair valueFair-value estimates from internal valuation techniques are verified, where possible, to prices obtained from independent vendors. Vendors compile prices from various sources. Where available, the Company may also make use of quoted prices for recent trading activity in securities with the same or similar characteristics to that being valued.

            The internal valuation techniques used for Alt-A mortgage securities, as with other mortgage exposures, consider estimated housing price changes, unemployment rates, interest rates and borrower attributes. They also consider prepayment rates as well as other market indicators.

            Alt-A mortgage securities that are valued using these methods are generally classified as Level 2. However, Alt-A mortgage securities backed by Alt-A mortgages of lower quality or more recent vintages are mostly classified in Level 3 due to the reduced liquidity that exists for such positions, which reduces the reliability of prices available from independent sources.

    Commercial Real Estate Exposure

            Citigroup reports a number of different exposures linked to commercial real estate at fair value with changes in fair value reported in earnings, including securities, loans and investments in entities that hold commercial real estate loans or commercial real estate directly. The Company also reports securities backed by commercial real estate as available-for-saleAvailable-for-sale investments, which are carried at fair value with changes in fair valuefair-value reported in OCI.AOCI.

            Similar to the valuation methodologies used for other Tradingtrading securities and Tradingtrading loans, the Company generally determines the fair value of securities and loans linked to commercial real estate utilizing internal valuation techniques. Fair valueFair-value estimates from internal valuation techniques are verified, where possible, to prices obtained from independent vendors. Vendors compile prices from various sources. Where available, the Company may also make use of quoted prices for recent trading activity in securities or loans with the same or similar characteristics to that being valued. Securities and loans linked to commercial real estate valued using these methodologies are generally classified as Level 3 as a result of the reduced liquidity currently in the market for such exposures.

            The fair value of investments in entities that hold commercial real estate loans or commercial real estate directly is determined using a similar methodology to that used for other non-public investments in real estate held by the Alternative Investments andSecurities and BankingS&B business. The Company uses an established process for determining the fair value of such securities, using commonly accepted valuation techniques, including the use of earnings multiples based on comparable public securities, industry specificindustry-specific non-earnings-based multiples and discounted cash flow models. In determining the fair value of such investments, the Company also considers events, such as a proposed sale of the investee company, initial public offerings, equity issuances, or other observable transactions. Such investments are generally classified in Level 3 of the fair-value hierarchy.

    Highly Leveraged Financing Commitments

            The Company reports approximately $800 million of highly leveraged loans as held for sale, which are measured on a LOCOM basis. The fair value hierarchy.of such exposures is determined,


    where possible, using quoted secondary-market prices and classified in Level 2 of the fair-value hierarchy if there is a sufficient level of activity in the market and quotes or traded prices are available with suitable frequency.

            However, due to the dislocation of the credit markets and the reduced market interest in higher risk/higher yield instruments since the latter half of 2007, liquidity in the market for highly leveraged financings has been limited. Therefore, a majority of such exposures are classified in Level 3 as quoted secondary market prices do not generally exist. The fair value for such exposures is determined using quoted prices for a similar asset or assets, adjusted for the specific attributes of the loan being valued.


    Fair-Value Elections

            The following table presents, as of March 31, 2008, those positions selected for fair-value accounting in accordance with SFAS 159, SFAS 156, and SFAS 155, as well as the changes in fair value for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007.

     
      
     Changes in fair value gains (losses)
     
     
      
     First Quarter 2008
     First Quarter 2007
     
    In millions of dollars
     March 31,
    2008

     Principal
    transactions

     Other
     Principal
    transactions

     Other
     
    Assets                
     Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell                
      Selected portfolios of securities purchased under agreements to resell, securities borrowed(1) $77,126 $1,093 $ $137 $ 
      
     
     
     
     
     
     Trading account assets:                
      Legg Mason convertible preferred equity securities originally classified as available-for-sale  10  (13)   (7)  
      Selected letters of credit hedged by credit default swaps or participation notes  10      2   
      Certain credit products  23,896  (635)   224   
      Certain mortgage loans held-for-sale  9,273    39     
      Certain hybrid financial instruments  63  3       
      Retained interests from asset securitizations  5,610  80    200   
      
     
     
     
     
     
     Total trading account assets  38,862  (565) 39  419   
      
     
     
     
     
     
     Investments:                
      Certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures  615    3    (3)
      Certain equity method investments  1,004    (18)   38 
      Other  354    3    5 
      
     
     
     
     
     
     Total investments  1,973    (12)   40 
      
     
     
     
     
     
    Loans:                
      Certain credit products  2,609  85    23   
      Certain mortgage loans held-for-sale  30    (2)    
      Certain hybrid financial instruments  665  (4)   (23)  
      
     
     
     
     
     
     Total loans  3,304  81  (2)    
      
     
     
     
     
     
    Other assets:                
      Mortgage servicing rights  7,716    (353)   125 
      
     
     
     
     
     
     Total other assets  7,716    (353)   125 
      
     
     
     
     
     
    Total $128,981 $609 $(328)$556 $165 
      
     
     
     
     
     
    Liabilities                
     Interest-bearing deposits:                
      Certain structured liabilities $334 $1 $ $ $ 
      Certain hybrid financial instruments  3,308  280    10   
      
     
     
     
     
     
     Total interest-bearing deposits  3,642  281    10   
      
     
     
     
     
     
     Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase                
     Selected portfolios of securities sold under agreements to repurchase, securities loaned(1)  179,917  (163)   (23)  
      
     
     
     
     
     
      Trading account liabilities:                
     Certain hybrid financial instruments  11,515  1,176    (78)  
      
     
     
     
     
     
     Short-term borrowings:                
      Certain non-collateralized short-term borrowings  4,930  (83)   (3)  
      Certain hybrid financial instruments  3,523  31    6   
      Certain non-structured liabilities  570         
      
     
     
     
     
     
    Total short-term borrowings  9,023  (52)   3   
      
     
     
     
     
     
     Long-term debt:                
      Certain structured liabilities  3,209  102    9   
      Certain non-structured liabilities  43,432  2,409       
      Certain hybrid financial instruments  24,506  870    544   
      
     
     
     
     
     
     Total long-term debt  71,147  3,381    553   
      
     
     
     
     
     
    Total $275,244 $4,623 $ $465 $ 
      
     
     
     
     
     

    (1)
    Reflects netting of the amounts due from securities purchased under agreements to resell and the amounts owed under securities sold under agreements to repurchase in accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 41, "Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Repurchase and Reverse Repurchase Agreements."

            The fair value of liabilities for which the fair-value option was elected, other than the liabilities of the SIVs consolidated by the Company, was impacted by the widening of the Company's credit spread. The estimated change in the fair value of these liabilities due to such changes in the Company's own credit risk (or instrument-specific credit risk) was a gain of $1,279 million and $131 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007, respectively. Changes in fair value resulting from changes in instrument-specific credit risk were estimated by incorporating the Company's current observable credit spreads into the relevant valuation technique used to value each liability as described above.

    Impact on Retained earnings of certain fair-value elections in accordance with SFAS 159

            Detailed below are the December 31, 2006 carrying values prior to adoption of SFAS 159, the transition adjustments booked to opening Retained earnings and the fair values (that is, the carrying values at January 1, 2007 after adoption) for those items that were selected for fair-value option accounting and that had an impact on Retained earnings:

    In millions of dollars
     December 31,
    2006
    (carrying
    value prior to
    adoption)

     Cumulative-
    effect
    adjustment
    to
    January 1,
    2007
    retained
    earnings—
    gain (loss)

     January 1,
    2007
    fair value
    (carrying
    value
    after
    adoption)

    Legg Mason convertible preferred equity securities originally classified as available-for-sale(1) $797 $(232)$797
    Selected portfolios of securities purchased under agreements to resell(2)  167,525  25  167,550
    Selected portfolios of securities sold under agreements to repurchase(2)  237,788  40  237,748
    Selected non-collateralized short-term borrowings  3,284  (7) 3,291
    Selected letters of credit hedged by credit default swaps or participation notes    14  14
    Various miscellaneous eligible items(1)  96  3  96
      
     
     
    Pretax cumulative effect of adopting fair value option accounting    $(157)  
    After-tax cumulative effect of adopting fair value option accounting     (99)  
      
     
     

    (1)
    The Legg Mason securities as well as several miscellaneous items were previously reported at fair value within available-for-sale securities. The cumulative-effect adjustment represents the reclassification of the related unrealized gain/loss from Accumulated other comprehensive income to Retained earnings upon the adoption of the fair value option.

    (2)
    Excludes netting of the amounts due from securities purchased under agreements to resell and the amounts owed under securities sold under agreements to repurchase in accordance with FIN 41.

            Additional information regarding each of these items follows.

    Legg Mason convertible preferred equity securities

            The Legg Mason convertible preferred equity securities (Legg shares) were acquired in connection with the sale of Citigroup's Asset Management business in December 2005. The Company held these shares as a non-strategic investment for long-term appreciation and, therefore, selected fair-value option accounting in anticipation of the future implementation of the Investment Company Audit Guide Statement of Position 07-1, "Clarification of the Scope of Audit and Accounting GuideAudits of Investment Companies and Accounting by Parent Companies and Equity Method Investors for Investment Companies" (SOP), which was to be effective beginning January 1, 2008. In February 2008, the FASB delayed the implementation of the SOP indefinitely.

            Under the current investment company accounting model, investments held in investment company vehicles are recorded at full fair value (where changes in fair value are recorded in earnings) and are not subject to consolidation guidelines. Under the SOP, non-strategic investments not held in investment companies, which are deemed similar to non-strategic investments held in Citigroup's investment companies, must be accounted for at full fair value in order for Citigroup to retain investment company accounting in the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements. Therefore, we have utilized the fair-value option to migrate the Legg shares from available-for-sale (where changes in fair value are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)) to a full fair value model (where changes in value are recorded in earnings).

            Prior to the election of fair value option accounting, the shares were classified as available-for-sale securities with the unrealized loss of $232 million as of December 31, 2006 included in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). In connection with the Company's adoption of SFAS 159, this unrealized loss was recorded as a reduction of January 1, 2007 Retained earnings as part of the cumulative-effect adjustment.

            During the first quarter of 2008, the Company sold the remaining 8.4 million shares of Legg at a pretax loss of $10.3 million ($6.7 million after-tax).

    Selected portfolios of securities purchased under agreements to resell, securities borrowed, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, securities loaned, and certain non-collateralized short-term borrowings

            The Company elected the fair-value option retrospectively for our United States and United Kingdom portfolios of fixed-income securities purchased under agreements to resell and fixed-income securities sold under agreements to repurchase (and certain non-collateralized short-term borrowings). The fair-value option was also elected prospectively in the second quarter of 2007 for certain portfolios of fixed-income


    securities lending and borrowing transactions based in Japan. In each case, the election was made because these positions are managed on a fair value basis. Specifically, related interest-rate risk is managed on a portfolio basis, primarily with derivative instruments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings. Previously, these positions were accounted for on an accrual basis.

            The cumulative effect of $58 million pretax ($37 million after-tax) from adopting the fair-value option for the U.S. and U.K. portfolios was recorded as an increase in the January 1, 2007 Retained earnings balance. The March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 net balance of $77.1 billion and $84.3 billion, respectively, for Securities purchased under agreements to resell and Securities borrowed, and $179.9 billion and $199.9 billion for Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and Securities loaned are included as such in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The uncollateralized short-term borrowings of $4.9 billion and $5.1billion as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, are recorded in that account in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

            Changes in fair value for transactions in these portfolios are recorded in Principal transactions. The related interest revenue and interest expense are measured based on the contractual rates specified in the transactions and are reported as interest revenue and expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

    Selected letters of credit and revolving loans hedged by credit default swaps or participation notes

            The Company has elected fair-value accounting for certain letters of credit that are hedged with derivative instruments or participation notes. Upon electing the fair-value option, the related portions of the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for unfunded lending commitments were reversed. Citigroup elected the fair-value option for these transactions because the risk is managed on a fair-value basis, and to mitigate accounting mismatches.

            The cumulative effect of $14 million pretax ($9 million after-tax) of adopting fair-value option accounting was recorded as an increase in the January 1, 2007 Retained earnings balance. The change in fair value as well as the receipt of related fees was reported as Principal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.

            The notional amount of these unfunded letters of credit was $1.4 billion as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. The amount funded was insignificant with no amounts 90 days or more past due or on a non-accrual status at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007.

            These items have been classified appropriately in Trading account assets or Trading account liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

    Various miscellaneous eligible items

            Several miscellaneous eligible items previously classified as available-for-sale securities were selected for fair-value option accounting. These items were selected in preparation for the adoption of the Investment Company Audit Guide SOP, as previously discussed. In February 2008, the FASB delayed the implementation of this SOP indefinitely.

    Other items for which the fair value option was selected in accordance with SFAS 159

            The Company has elected the fair-value option for the following eligible items, which did not affect opening Retained earnings:

    Certain credit products

            Citigroup has elected the fair-value option for certain originated and purchased loans, including certain unfunded loan products, such as guarantees and letters of credit, executed by Citigroup's trading businesses. None of these credit products are highly leveraged financing commitments. Significant groups of transactions include loans and unfunded loan products that will either be sold or securitized in the near term, or transactions where the economic risks are hedged with derivative instruments. Citigroup has elected the fair-value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications. Fair value was not elected for most lending transactions across the Company, including where those management objectives would not be met.

            The balances for these loan products, which are classified in Trading account assets or Loans, were $23.9 billion and $2.6 billion as of March 31, 2008, and $26.0 billion and $3.0 billion as of December 31, 2007, respectively. The aggregate unpaid principal balances exceeded the aggregate fair values by $1.4 billion and $894 million as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. $174 million and $186 million of these loans were on a non-accrual basis as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. For those loans that are on a non-accrual basis, the aggregate unpaid principal balances exceeded the aggregate fair values by $83 million as of March 31, 2008 and $68 million as of December 31, 2007.

            In addition, $180 million and $141 million of unfunded loan commitments related to certain credit products selected for fair-value accounting were outstanding as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.

            Changes in fair value of funded and unfunded credit products are classified in Principal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income. Related interest revenue is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as Interest revenue on trading account assets or loans depending on their balance sheet classifications. The changes in fair value for the three months ended March 31, 2008 due to instrument-specific credit risk totaled to a loss of $16 million.

    Certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures

            Citigroup invests in private equity and real estate ventures for the purpose of earning investment returns and for capital appreciation. The Company has elected the fair-value option for certain of these ventures in anticipation of the future


    implementation of the Investment Company Audit Guide SOP, because such investments are considered similar to many private equity or hedge fund activities in our investment companies, which are reported at fair value. See previous discussion regarding the SOP. The fair-value option brings consistency in the accounting and evaluation of certain of these investments. As required by SFAS 159, all investments (debt and equity) in such private equity and real estate entities are accounted for at fair value.

            These investments, which totaled $615 million and $539 million as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, are classified as Investments on Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet. Changes in the fair values of these investments are classified in Other revenue in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.

    Certain structured liabilities

            The Company has elected the fair-value option for certain structured liabilities whose performance is linked to structured interest rates, inflation or currency risks ("structured liabilities"), but do not qualify for the fair value election under SFAS 155.

            The Company has elected the fair-value option for structured liabilities, because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and, therefore, are managed on a fair-value basis. These positions will continue to be classified as debt, deposits or derivatives according to their legal form on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet. The balances for these structured liabilities, which are classified as Interest-bearing deposits and Long-term debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, are $334 million and $3.2 billion as of March 31, 2008 and $264 million and $3.0 billion as of December 31, 2007.

            For those structured liabilities classified as Long-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected, the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeds the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $58 million as of March 31, 2008 and $7 million as of December 31, 2007.

            The change in fair value for these structured liabilities is reported in Principal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.

            Related interest expense is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the Consolidated Income Statement.

    Certain non-structured liabilities

            The Company has elected the fair-value option for certain non-structured liabilities with fixed and non-structured floating interest rates ("non-structured liabilities"). The Company has elected the fair-value option where the interest-rate risk of such liabilities is economically hedged with derivative contracts or the proceeds are used to purchase financial assets that will also be fair valued. The election has been made to mitigate accounting mismatches and to achieve operational simplifications. These positions are reported in Short-term borrowings and Long-term debt on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet. The balance of these non-structured liabilities as of March 31, 2008 was $570 million and $43.4 billion, and as of December 31, 2007 was $4.8 billion and $49.1 billion, respectively.

            The majority of these non-structured liabilities are a result of the Company's election of the fair value option for liabilities associated with the consolidation of CAI's Structured Investment Vehicles (SIVs) during the fourth quarter of 2007. The change in fair values of the SIV's liabilities reported in earnings was $2.1 billion for the quarter ended March 31, 2008.

            For these non-structured liabilities classified as Long-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected, the aggregate fair value exceeds the aggregate unpaid principal balance of such instruments by $1.2 billion as of March 31, 2008 and $434 million as of December 31, 2007.

            The change in fair value for these non-structured liabilities is reported in Principal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.

            Related interest expense continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the Consolidated Income Statement.

    Certain equity-method investments

            Citigroup adopted fair-value accounting for various non-strategic investments in leveraged buyout funds and other hedge funds that previously were required to be accounted for under the equity method. Management elected fair-value accounting to reduce operational and accounting complexity. Since the funds account for all of their underlying assets at full fair value, the impact of applying the equity method to Citigroup's investment in these funds was equivalent to fair value accounting. Thus, this fair-value election had no impact on opening Retained earnings.

            These fund investments, which totaled $1.0 billion and as of March 31, 2008, and $1.1 billion as of December 31, 2007, are classified as Investments on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Changes in the fair values of these investments are classified in other revenue in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

    Certain mortgage loans held-for-sale

            Citigroup has elected the fair-value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans held-for-sale. These loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments. The Company has elected the fair-value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications. The fair-value option was not elected for loans held-for-investment, as those loans are not hedged with derivative instruments. This election was effective for applicable instruments originated or purchased since September 1, 2007.

            The balance of these mortgage loans held-for-sale, which were classified as Trading assets as of March 31, 2008, was $9.3 billion. As of December 31, 2007, the balance was $6.4 billion and was classified as Other assets. The aggregate fair value exceeded the unpaid principal balances by $195 million as of March 31, 2008, and $136 million as of December 31, 2007. The balance of these loans 90 days or more past due and on a non-accrual basis was $16 million at March 31, 2008, and $17 million at December 31, 2007, with aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeding aggregate fair values by $6 million at March 31, 2008. The difference between aggregate fair values and aggregate unpaid principal balance was immaterial at December 31, 2007.


            The changes in fair values of these mortgage loans held-for-sale is reported in other revenue for the 2008 first quarter in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income. The changes in fair value during the three months ended March 31, 2008 due to instrument-specific credit risk were immaterial. Related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the Consolidated Income Statement.

    Items selected for fair-value accounting in accordance with SFAS 155 and SFAS 156

    Certain hybrid financial instruments

            The Company has elected to apply fair-value accounting under SFAS 155 for certain hybrid financial assets and liabilities whose performance is linked to risks other than interest rate, foreign exchange or inflation (e.g., equity, credit or commodity risks). In addition, the Company has elected fair-value accounting under SFAS 155 for residual interests retained from securitizing certain financial assets.

            The Company has elected fair-value accounting for these instruments because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and, therefore, are managed on a fair-value basis. In addition, the accounting for these instruments is simplified under a fair-value approach as it eliminates the complicated operational requirements of bifurcating the embedded derivatives from the host contracts and accounting for each separately. The hybrid financial instruments are classified as loans, deposits, trading liabilities (for pre-paid derivatives) or debt on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet according to their legal form, while residual interests in certain securitizations are classified as trading account assets.

            The outstanding balances for these hybrid financial instruments classified in Loans is $665 million, while $3.3 billion was in Interest-bearing deposits, $11.5 billion in Trading account liabilities, $3.5 billion in Short-term borrowings and $24.5 billion in Long-term debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2008. As of December 31, 2007, the outstanding balances for such instruments were classified in loans was $689 million, while $3.3 billion was in Interest-bearing deposits, $12.1 billion in Trading account liabilities, $3.6 billion in Short-term borrowings and $27.3 billion in Long-term debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. In addition, $5.6 billion of the $5.7 billion reported in Trading account assets as of March 31, 2008 and $2.5 billion of the $2.6 billion reported as of December 31, 2007, respectively, were for the retained interests in securitizations.

            For hybrid financial instruments for which fair-value accounting has been elected under SFAS 155 and that are classified as Long-term debt, the aggregate fair value exceeds the aggregate unpaid principal balance by$342 million and $460 million as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, while the difference for those instruments classified as Loans is immaterial.

            Changes in fair value for hybrid financial instruments, which in most cases includes a component for accrued interest, are recorded in Principal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income. Interest accruals for certain hybrid instruments classified as trading assets are recorded separately from the change in fair value as Interest revenue in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.

    Mortgage servicing rights

            The Company accounts for mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) at fair value in accordance with SFAS 156. Fair value for MSRs is determined using an option-adjusted spread valuation approach. This approach consists of projecting servicing cash flows under multiple interest-rate scenarios and discounting these cash flows using risk-adjusted discount rates. The model assumptions used in the valuation of MSRs include mortgage prepayment speeds and discount rates. The fair value of MSRs is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates. In managing this risk, the Company hedges a significant portion of the values of its MSRs through the use of interest-rate derivative contracts, forward-purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities, and purchased securities classified as trading. See Note 14 on page 80 for further discussions regarding the accounting and reporting of MSRs.

            These MSRs, which totaled $7.7 billion and $8.4 billion as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, are classified as Intangible assets on Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet. Changes in fair value for MSRs are recorded in Commissions and fees in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.


    Items Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

            The following tables present for each of the fair-value hierarchy levels the Company's assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at March 31, 20082009 and December 31, 2007.2008. The Company often hedges positions that have been classified in the Level 3 category with financial instruments that have been classified as Level 1 or Level 2. In addition, the Company also hedges items classified in the Level 3 category with instruments classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The effects of these hedges are presented gross in the following table.

    In millions of dollars at March 31, 2008

     Level 1
     Level 2
     Level 3
     Gross
    inventory

     Netting(1)
     Net
    balance

    Assets                  
    Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell $ $122,443 $16 $122,459 $(45,333)$77,126
    Trading account assets                  
     Trading securities and loans  126,152  237,132  90,672  453,956    453,956
     Derivatives  12,354  650,680  40,497  703,531  (579,050) 124,481
    Investments  45,295  129,935  20,539  195,769    195,769
    Loans(2)    3,211  93  3,304    3,304
    Mortgage servicing rights      7,716  7,716    7,716
    Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis    10,462  812  11,274  (8,626) 2,648
      
     
     
     
     
     
    Total assets $183,801 $1,153,863 $160,345 $1,498,009 $(633,009)$865,000
       12.3% 77.0% 10.7% 100.0%     
      
     
     
     
     
     
    Liabilities                  
    Interest-bearing deposits $ $3,537 $105 $3,642 $ $3,642
    Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase    219,042  6,208  225,250  (45,333) 179,917
    Trading account liabilities                  
     Securities sold, not yet purchased  60,998  13,188  1,817  76,003    76,003
     Derivatives  13,568  644,481  41,449  699,498  (573,515) 125,983
    Short-term borrowings    2,873  6,150  9,023    9,023
    Long-term debt    23,948  47,199  71,147    71,147
    Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis    11,194    11,194  (8,626) 2,568
      
     
     
     
     
     
    Total liabilities $74,566 $918,263 $102,928 $1,095,757 $(627,474)$468,283
       6.8% 83.8% 9.4% 100.0%     
      
     
     
     
     
     
    In millions of dollars at December 31, 2007

     Level 1
     Level 2
     Level 3
     Gross
    inventory

     Netting(1)
     Net
    balance

    Assets                  
    Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell $ $132,383 $16 $132,399 $(48,094)$84,305
    Trading account assets                  
     Trading securities and loans  151,684  234,846  75,573  462,103    462,103
     Derivatives  7,204  428,779  31,226  467,209  (390,328) 76,881
    Investments  64,375  125,282  17,060  206,717    206,717
    Loans(2)    3,718  9  3,727    3,727
    Mortgage servicing rights      8,380  8,380    8,380
    Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis    13,570  1,171  14,741  (4,939) 9,802
      
     
     
     
     
     
    Total assets $223,263 $938,578 $133,435 $1,295,276 $(443,361)$851,915
       17.2% 72.5% 10.3% 100.0%     
      
     
     
     
     
     
    Liabilities                  
    Interest-bearing deposits $ $3,542 $56 $3,598 $ $3,598
    Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase    241,790  6,158  247,948  (48,094) 199,854
    Trading account liabilities                  
     Securities sold, not yet purchased  68,928  9,140  473  78,541    78,541
     Derivatives  8,602  447,119  33,696  489,417  (385,876) 103,541
    Short-term borrowings    8,471  5,016  13,487    13,487
    Long-term debt    70,359  8,953  79,312    79,312
    Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis    6,506  1  6,507  (4,939) 1,568
      
     
     
     
     
     
    Total liabilities $77,530 $786,927 $54,353 $918,810 $(438,909)$479,901
       8.4% 85.7% 5.9% 100.0%     
      
     
     
     
     
     
    In millions of dollars at March 31, 2009 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Gross
    inventory
     Netting(1) Net balance 
    Assets                   
    Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell $ $106,306 $ $106,306 $(26,632)$79,674 
    Trading securities                   
     Trading mortgage-backed securities                   
      U.S. government sponsored $ $23,091 $1,388 $24,479 $ $24,479 
      Prime    1,070  1,285  2,355    2,355 
      Alt-A    393  832  1,225    1,225 
      Subprime    476  11,036  11,512    11,512 
      Non-U.S. residential    218  181  399    399 
      Commercial    481  2,020  2,501    2,501 
                  
     Total trading mortgage-backed securities $ $25,729 $16,742 $42,471 $ $42,471 
                  
     U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities                   
      U.S. Treasury $8,297 $233 $ $8,530 $ $8,530 
      Agency obligations  79  5,523  51  5,653    5,653 
                  
     Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities $8,376 $5,756 $51 $14,183 $ $14,183 
                  
     Other trading securities                   
     State and municipal $ $6,416 $198 $6,614 $ $6,614 
     Foreign government $48,860 $12,342 $1,011 $62,213 $ $62,213 
     Corporate $ $42,694 $12,382 $55,076 $ $55,076 
     Equity securities $28,241 $4,006 $1,740 $33,987 $ $33,987 
     Other debt securities $ $14,072 $10,746 $24,818 $ $24,818 
                  
    Total trading securities $85,477 $111,015 $42,870 $239,362 $ $239,362 
                  
    Derivatives $7,703 $1,024,159 $49,911 $1,081,773 $(985,913)$95,860 
                  
    Investments                   
     Mortgage-backed securities                   
      U.S. government sponsored $ $27,409 $ $27,409 $ $27,409 
      Prime    5,083  1,125  6,208    6,208 
      Alt-A    220  177  397    397 
      Subprime      12  12    12 
      Non-U.S. residential    413    413    413 
      Commercial      469  469    469 
                  
     Total investment mortgage-backed securities $ $33,125 $1,783 $34,908 $ $34,908 
                  
     U.S. Treasury and federal Agency securities                   
       U.S. Treasury $4,629 $405 $ $5,034 $ $5,034 
       Agency obligations  224  9,105    9,329    9,329 
                  
     Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency $4,853 $9,510 $ $14,363 $ $14,363 
                  
     State and municipal $ $13,825 $207 $14,032 $ $14,032 
     Foreign government $34,918 $30,566 $643 $66,127 $ $66,127 
     Corporate $ $18,361 $2,192 $20,553 $ $20,553 
     Equity securities $1,624 $626 $2,849 $5,099 $ $5,099 
     Other debt securities $ $687 $7,542 $8,229 $ $8,229 
    Non-Marketable equity securities $24 $92 $7,479 $7,595 $ $7,595 
                  
    Total investments $41,419 $106,792 $22,695 $170,906 $ $170,906 
                  
    Loans(2) $ $2,182 $171 $2,353 $ $2,353 
    Mortgage servicing rights $ $ $5,481 $5,481 $ $5,481 
    Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis $ $8,265 $2,515 $10,780 $(2,527)$8,253 
                  
    Total assets $134,599 $1,358,719 $123,643 $1,616,961 $(1,015,072)$601,889 
       8.3% 84.0% 7.7% 100.0%      
                  


    In millions of dollars at March 31, 2009 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Gross
    inventory
     Netting(1) Net
    balance
     
    Liabilities                   
    Interest-bearing deposits $ $2,208 $41 $2,249 $ $2,249 
    Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase $ $138,217 $10,732 $148,949 $(26,632)$122,317 
    Trading account liabilities                   
     Securities sold, not yet purchased $36,253 $12,124 $1,311 $49,688 $ $49,688 
     Derivatives $7,847 $1,003,651 $46,372 $1,057,870 $(976,732)$81,138 
    Short-term borrowings $ $6,259 $1,030 $7,289 $ $7,289 
    Long-term debt $ $12,897 $10,438 $23,335 $ $23,335 
    Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis $ $10,591 $1 $10,592 $(2,527)$8,065 
                  
    Total liabilities $44,100 $1,185,947 $69,925 $1,299,972 $(1,005,891)$294,081 
       3.4% 91.2% 5.4% 100.0%      
                  

    (1)
    Represents netting of: (i) the amounts due under securities purchased under agreements to resell and the amounts owed under securities sold under agreements to repurchase in accordance with FIN 41, and (ii) derivative exposures covered by a qualifying master netting agreement in accordance with FIN 39, cash collateral, and the market value adjustment.

    (2)
    There is no allowance for loan losses recorded for loans reported at fair value.

    In millions of dollars at December 31, 2008 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Gross
    inventory
     Netting(1) Net balance 
    Assets                   
    Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell $ $96,524 $ $96,524 $(26,219)$70,305 
    Trading account assets                   
     Trading securities and loans  90,530  121,043  50,773  262,346    262,346 
     Derivatives  9,675  1,102,252  60,725  1,172,652  (1,057,363) 115,289 
    Investments  44,342  111,836  28,273  184,451    184,451 
    Loans(2)    2,572  160  2,732    2,732 
    Mortgage servicing rights      5,657  5,657    5,657 
    Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis    9,890  359  10,249  (4,527) 5,722 
                  
    Total assets $144,547 $1,444,117 $145,947 $1,734,611 $(1,088,109)$646,502 
       8.3% 83.3% 8.4% 100.0%      
                  
    Liabilities                   
    Interest-bearing deposits $ $2,552 $54 $2,606 $ $2,606 
    Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase    153,918  11,167  165,085  (26,219) 138,866 
    Trading account liabilities                   
     Securities sold, not yet purchased  36,848  13,192  653  50,693    50,693 
     Derivatives  10,038  1,096,113  57,139  1,163,290  (1,046,505) 116,785 
    Short-term borrowings    16,278  1,329  17,607    17,607 
    Long-term debt    16,065  11,198  27,263    27,263 
    Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis    8,222  1  8,223  (4,527) 3,696 
                  
    Total liabilities $46,886 $1,306,340 $81,541 $1,434,767 $(1,077,251)$357,516 
       3.3% 91.0% 5.7% 100.0%      
                  

    (1)
    Represents netting of: (i) the amounts due under securities purchased under agreements to resell and the amounts owed under securities sold under agreements to repurchase in accordance with FIN 41, and (ii) derivative exposures covered by a qualifying master netting agreement in accordance with FIN 39, cash collateral, and the market value adjustment.

    (2)
    There is no allowance for loan losses recorded for loans reported at fair value.

    Changes in Level 3 Fair-Value Category

            TheDecember 31, the following tables present the changes in the Level 3 fair-value category for the three months ended March 31, 20082009 and 2007.December 31, 2008. The Company classifies financial instruments in Level 3 of the fair-value hierarchy when there is reliance on at least one significant unobservable input to the valuation model. In addition to these unobservable inputs, the valuation models for Level 3 financial instruments typically also rely on a number of inputs that are readily observable either directly or indirectly. Thus, the gains and losses presented below include changes in the fair value related to both observable and unobservable inputs.

            The Company often hedges positions with offsetting positions that are classified in a different level. For example, the gains and losses for assets and liabilities in the Level 3 category presented in the tables below do not reflect the effect of offsetting losses and gains on hedging instruments that have been classified by the Company in the Level 1 and Level 2 categories. In addition, the Company hedges items classified in the Level 3 category with instruments also classified in Level 3 of the fair-value hierarchy. The effects of these hedges are presented gross in the following tables.

     
      
     Net realized/
    unrealized gains
    (losses) included in

      
      
      
      
     
     
      
     Transfers
    in and/or
    out of
    Level 3

     Purchases,
    issuances
    and
    settlements

      
     Unrealized
    gains
    (losses)
    still held(3)

     
    In millions of dollars

     December 31, 2007
     Principal
    transactions

     Other(1)(2)
     March 31,
    2008

     
    Assets                      
    Securities purchased under agreements to resell $16 $ $ $ $ $16 $ 
    Trading account assets                      
     Trading securities and
        loans(4)
      75,573  (8,416)   17,952  5,563  90,672  (8,548)
    Investments  17,060    (1,336) 3,432  1,383  20,539  (747)
    Loans  9  6      78  93  6 
    Mortgage servicing rights  8,380    (353)   (311) 7,716  (316)
    Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis  1,171    17  (519) 143  812  32 
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Liabilities                      
    Interest-bearing deposits $56 $(9)$ $13 $27 $105 $(4)
    Securities sold under agreements to repurchase  6,158  (139)   344  (433) 6,208  (135)
    Trading account liabilities                      
     Securities sold, not yet
        purchased
      473  5    672  677  1,817  49 
     Derivatives, net(5)  2,470  1,474    1,075  (1,119) 952  1,650 
    Short-term borrowings(6)  5,016  (70)   1,508  (444) 6,150  (74)
    Long-term debt(6)  8,953  163    37,954  455  47,199  (325)
    Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis  1    1         
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
      
     Net realized/
    unrealized gains
    (losses) included in

      
      
      
      
     
     
      
     Transfers
    in and/or
    out of
    Level 3

      
      
     Unrealized
    gains
    (losses)
    still held(3)

     
    In millions of dollars

     January 1,
    2007

     Principal
    transactions

     Other(1)(2)
     Purchases,
    issuances and settlements

     March 31,
    2007

     
    Assets                      
    Securities purchased under agreements to resell $16 $ $ $ $ $16 $ 
    Trading account assets                      
     Trading securities and
        loans(7)
      22,415  493    2,341  6,994  32,243  970 
     Derivatives, net(5)  1,875  406    286  (1,333) 1,234  109 
    Investments  11,468    183  580  422  12,653  29 
    Loans               
    Mortgage servicing rights  5,439    125    3,268  8,832  125 
    Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis  948    144  (418) 242  916  140 
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Liabilities                      
    Interest-bearing deposits $60 $1 $ $ $48 $107 $2 
    Securities sold under agreements to repurchase  6,778  (60)   (193) (367) 6,278  (20)
    Trading account liabilities                      
     Securities sold, not yet purchased  467  28    (98) 93  434  (75)
    Short-term borrowings  2,214  (8)   (21) (312) 1,889  (1)
    Long-term debt  1,693        (344) 1,349   
    Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis          8  8   
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
      
     Net realized/ unrealized gains (losses) included in  
      
      
      
     
     
      
     Transfers
    in and/or
    out of
    Level 3
     Purchases,
    issuances
    and
    settlements
      
     Unrealized
    gains
    (losses)
    still held(3)
     
    In millions of dollars at March 31, 2009 December 31,
    2008
     Principal
    transactions
     Other(1)(2) March 31,
    2009
     
    Assets                      
    Trading securities                      
     Trading mortgage-backed securities                      
      U.S. government sponsored $1,397 $(28)$ $10 $9 $1,388 $(1)
      Prime  850  (35)   439  31  1,285  (19)
      Alt-A  735  (69)   (187) 353  832  (9)
      Subprime  14,494  (2,363)   (710) (385) 11,036  (2,049)
      Non-U.S. residential  714  (32)   (490) (11) 181  (3)
      Commercial  2,086  (200)   159  (25) 2,020  (161)
                    
     Total trading mortgage-backed securities $20,276 $(2,727)$ $(779)$(28)$16,742 $(2,242)
                    
     U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities                      
      U.S. Treasury $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 
      Agency obligations  59  (9)     1  51  (9)
                    
     Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities $59 $(9)$ $ $1 $51 $(9)
                    
     Other trading securities                      
     State and municipal $233 $1   $56 $(92)$198 $ 
     Foreign government  1,261  36    23  (309) 1,011  31 
     Corporate  16,027  (924)   (1,041) (1,680) 12,382  (1,045)
     Equity securities  1,387  (21)   17  357  1,740  31 
     Other debt securities  11,530  (327)   (1,307) 850  10,746  (23)
                    
    Total trading securities $50,773 $(3,971)$  (3,031)$(901)$42,870 $(3,257)
                    
    Derivatives, net(4) $3,586 $116 $ $(1,081)$918 $3,539 $26 
                    
    Investments                      
     Mortgage-backed securities                      
      Prime $1,163 $ $2 $204 $(244)$1,125 $(5)
      Alt-A  111    (7) 8  65  177  (10)
      Subprime  25    (6)   (7) 12  (5)
      Commercial  964    (19) (402) (74) 469  (18)
                    
     Total investment mortgage-backed debt securities $2,263 $  (30) (190) (260)$1,783 $(38)
                    
     State and municipal $222 $ $ $(15)$ $207 $ 
     Foreign government  571      72    643   
     Corporate  1,019    (23) 753  443  2,192  (2)
     Equity securities  3,807    (529) (123) (306) 2,849  (389)
     Other debt securities  11,324    (1,670) (562) (1,550) 7,542  (1,741)
     Non-Marketable equity securities  9,067    (727) (858) (3) 7,479  (530)
                    
    Total investments $28,273 $ $(2,979)$(923)$(1,676)$22,695 $(2,700)
                    

     
      
     Net realized/ unrealized gains (losses) included in  
      
      
      
     
     
      
     Transfers
    in and/or
    out of
    Level 3
     Purchases,
    issuances
    and
    settlements
      
     Unrealized
    gains
    (losses)
    still held(3)
     
    In millions of dollars at March 31, 2009 December 31,
    2008
     Principal
    transactions
     Other(1)(2) March 31,
    2009
     
    Loans $160 $ $(5)$ $16 $171 $(5)
    Mortgage servicing rights  5,657    (130)   (46) 5,481  (130)
    Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis  359    1,919  427  (190) 2,515  1,640 
                    
    Liabilities                      
    Interest-bearing deposits $54 $ $4 $ $(9)$41 $3 
    Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase  11,167  32    (329) (74) 10,732  32 
    Trading account liabilities                      
     Securities sold, not yet purchased  653  36    419  275  1,311  (8)
    Short-term borrowings  1,329    (108) (697) 290  1,030  (86)
    Long-term debt  11,198    448  (377) 65  10,438  309 
    Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis  1    (1)   (1) 1  (1)
                    

     
      
     Net realized/unrealized gains (losses) included in  
      
      
      
     
     
      
     Transfers
    in and/or
    out of
    Level 3
     Purchases,
    issuances
    and
    settlements
      
     Unrealized
    gains
    (losses)
    Still held(3)
     
    In millions of dollars December 31,
    2007
     Principal
    transactions
     Other(1)(2) March 31,
    2008
     
    Assets                      
    Securities purchased under agreements to resell $16 $ $ $ $(16)$ $ 
    Trading account assets                      
     Trading securities and loans  75,573  (28,052)   7,418  (4,166) 50,773  (19,572)
     Derivatives, net(4)  (2,470) 7,804    (2,188) 440  3,586  9,622 
    Investments  17,060    (4,917) 5,787  10,343  28,273  (801)
    Loans  9    (15)   166  160  (19)
    Mortgage servicing rights  8,380    (1,870)   (853) 5,657  (1,870)
    Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis  1,171    86  422  (1,320) 359  86 
                    
    Liabilities                      
    Interest-bearing deposits $56 $(5)$ $13 $(20)$54 $(3)
    Securities sold under agreements to repurchase  6,158  (273)   6,158  (1,422) 11,167  (136)
    Trading account liabilities                      
     Securities sold, not yet purchased  473  153    1,036  (703) 653  328 
    Short-term borrowings  5,016  106    (1,798) (1,783) 1,329  (63)
    Long-term debt  8,953  2,228    38,792  (34,319) 11,198  1,115 
    Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis  1    (61)   (61) 1   
                    

    (1)
    Changes in fair value for available-for-sale investments (debt securities) are recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income, while gains and losses from sales are recorded inRealized gains (losses) from sales of investments on the Consolidated Statement of Income.

    (2)
    Unrealized gains (losses) on MSRs are recorded inCommissions and fees on the Consolidated Statement of Income.

    (3)
    Represents the amount of total gains or losses for the period, included in earnings (and Accumulated other comprehensive income for changes in fair value for available-for-sale investments), attributable to the change in fair value relating to assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 that are still held at March 31, 20082009 and 2007.2008.

    (4)
    Total Level 3 derivative exposures have been netted on these tables for presentation purposes only.

    The increasefollowing is a discussion of the changes to the Level 3 balances for each of the roll-forward tables presented above. The significant changes from December 31, 2008 to March 31, 2009 in Level 3 tradingassets and liabilities are due to:

            The $15.1 billion increase in trading securities and loans was largelymainly driven by:

    Items Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

            Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a non-recurringnonrecurring basis and therefore are not included in the tables above. These include assets measured at cost that have been written down to fair value during the periods as a result of an impairment. In addition, assets such as loans held-for-saleheld for sale that are measured at the lower of cost or market (LOCOM) that were recognized at fair value below cost at the end of the period. Assets measured at cost that have been written down to fair value during the period as a result of an impairment are also included.

            The fair value of loans measured on a LOCOM basis is determined where possible using quoted secondary-market prices. Such loans are generally classified in Level 2 of the fair-value hierarchy given the level of activity in the market and the frequency of available quotes. If no such quoted price exists, the fair value of a loan is determined using quoted prices for a similar asset or assets, adjusted for the specific attributes of that loan.

            The following table presents all loans held-for-sale that are carried at LOCOM as of March 31, 20082009 and December 200731, 2008 (in billions):

     
     Aggregate
    Cost

     Fair value
     Level 2
     Level 3
    March 31, 2008 $39.1 $35.0 $5.5 $29.5
    December 31, 2007  33.6  31.9  5.1  26.8
      
     
     
     
     
     Aggregate
    Cost
     Fair
    Value
     Level 2 Level 3 

    March 31, 2009

     $1.0 $0.5 $0.5 $0.0 

    December 31, 2008

      3.1  2.1  0.8  1.3 


    18.    FAIR-VALUE ELECTIONS (SFAS 155, SFAS 156 and SFAS 159)

            Under SFAS 159, the Company may elect to report most financial instruments and certain other items at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis with changes in fair value reported in earnings. After the initial adoption, the election is made upon the acquisition of an eligible financial asset, financial liability or firm commitment or when certain specified reconsideration events occur. The fair-value election may not be revoked once an election is made.

            Additionally, the transition provisions of SFAS 159 permit a one-time election for existing positions at the adoption date with a cumulative-effect adjustment included in opening retained earnings and future changes in fair value reported in earnings.

            The Company also has elected the fair-value accounting provisions permitted under SFAS 155 and SFAS 156 for certain assets and liabilities. In accordance with SFAS 155, which was primarily adopted on a prospective basis, hybrid financial instruments, such as structured notes containing embedded derivatives that otherwise would require bifurcation, as well as certain interest-only instruments, may be accounted for at fair value if the Company makes an irrevocable election to do so on an instrument-by-instrument basis. The changes in fair value are recorded in current earnings. Additional discussion regarding the applicable areas in which SFAS 155 was adopted is presented in Note 17.

            SFAS 156 requires all servicing rights to be recognized initially at fair value. At its initial adoption, the standard permits a one-time irrevocable election to re-measure each class of servicing rights at fair value, with the changes in fair value recorded in current earnings. The classes of servicing rights are identified based on the availability of market inputs used in determining their fair values and the methods for managing their risks. The Company has elected fair-value accounting for its mortgage and student loan classes of servicing rights. The impact of adopting this standard was not material. See Note 15 for further discussions regarding the accounting and reporting of mortgage servicing rights.


            For         The following table presents, as of March 31, 2009, the fair value of those positions selected for fair-value accounting in accordance with SFAS 159, SFAS 156, and SFAS 155, as well as the changes in fair value for the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008.

     
     Fair Value at Changes in fair value gains
    (losses) for quarters ended
    March 31,
     
    In millions of dollars March 31,
    2009
     December 31,
    2008
     2009 2008(2) 
    Assets             
    Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell Selected portfolios of securities purchased under agreements to resell, securities borrowed(1) $79,674 $70,305 $(289)$1,093 
              
    Trading account assets:             
     Legg Mason convertible preferred equity securities originally classified as available-for-sale $ $ $ $(13)
     Selected letters of credit hedged by credit default swaps or participation notes  3    2   
     Certain credit products  13,047  16,254  1,139  (635)
     Certain hybrid financial instruments  18  33    3 
     Retained interests from asset securitizations  2,728  3,026  507  80 
              
    Total trading account assets $15,796 $19,313 $1,648 $(565)
              
    Investments:             
     Certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures $411 $469 $(28)$3 
     Other  227  295  (72) 3 
              
    Total investments $638 $764 $(100)$6 
              
    Loans:             
     Certain credit products $1,944 $2,315 $(21)$(15)
     Certain mortgage loans  32  36  (1) (2)
     Certain hybrid financial instruments  377  381  (18) (5)
              
    Total loans $2,353 $2,732 $(40)$(22)
              
    Other assets:             
     Mortgage servicing rights $5,481 $5,657 $130 $(353)
     Certain mortgage loans  5,256  4,273  116  105 
     Certain equity method investments  759  936  (22) (18)
              
    Total other assets $11,496 $10,866 $224 $(266)
              
    Total $109,957 $103,980 $1,443 $246 
              
    Liabilities             
    Interest-bearing deposits:             
     Certain structured liabilities $232 $320 $ $1 
     Certain hybrid financial instruments  2,017  2,286  (74) 276 
              
    Total interest-bearing deposits $2,249 $2,606 $(74)$277 
              
    Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase             
     Selected portfolios of securities sold under agreements to repurchase, securities loaned(1) $122,317 $138,866 $27 $(163)
              
    Trading account liabilities:             
     Selected letters of credit hedged by credit default swaps or participation notes $35 $72 $37 $ 
     Certain hybrid financial instruments  4,237  4,679  528  1,176 
              
    Total trading account liabilities $4,272 $4,751 $565 $1,176 
              
    Short-term borrowings:             
     Certain non-collateralized short-term borrowings $1,342 $2,303 $34 $(83)
     Certain hybrid financial instruments  615  2,112  30  31 
     Certain structured liabilities  3  3     
     Certain non-structured liabilities  5,329  13,189  8   
              
    Total short-term borrowings $7,289 $17,607 $72 $(52)
              
    Long-term debt:             
     Certain structured liabilities $2,802 $3,083 $229 $102 
     Certain non-structured liabilities  5,870  7,189  44  2,409 
     Certain hybrid financial instruments  14,663  16,991  512  870 
              
    Total long-term debt $23,335 $27,263 $785 $3,381 
              
    Total $159,462 $191,093 $1,375 $4,619 
              

    (1)
    Reflects netting of the amounts due from securities purchased under agreements to resell and the amounts owed under securities sold under agreements to repurchase in accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 41, "Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Repurchase and Reverse Repurchase Agreements" (FIN 41).

    (2)
    Reclassified to conform to current period's presentation.

    Own-Credit Valuation Adjustment

            The fair value of debt liabilities for which the fair-value option was elected (other than non-recourse and similar liabilities) was impacted by the widening of the Company's credit spread. The estimated change in the fair value of these debt liabilities due to such changes in the Company's own credit risk (or instrument-specific credit risk) was a gain of $180 million and $1.28 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008, and 2007, the resulting charges taken on loans held-for-sale carried atrespectively. Changes in fair value below costresulting from changes in instrument-specific credit risk were $2.3estimated by incorporating the Company's current observable credit spreads into the relevant valuation technique used to value each liability as described above.

            During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company changed the source of its credit spreads from those observed in the credit default swap market to those observed in the bond market. Had this modification been in place since the beginning of 2008, the change in the Company's own credit spread would have been a gain of $1.25 billion, or approximately $30 million less than that previously reported.

    SFAS 159 The Fair-Value Option for Financial Assets and $1.8 billion, respectively.Financial Liabilities

    Highly Leveraged Financing CommitmentsLegg Mason convertible preferred equity securities

            The Legg Mason convertible preferred equity securities (Legg shares) were acquired in connection with the sale of Citigroup's Asset Management business in December 2005. Prior to the election of fair-value option accounting, the shares were classified as available-for-sale securities with the unrealized loss of $232 million as of December 31, 2006 included inAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss). In connection with the Company's adoption of SFAS 159, this unrealized loss was recorded as a reduction of January 1, 2007Retained earnings as part of the cumulative-effect adjustment.

            During the first quarter of 2008, the Company sold the remaining 8.4 million Legg shares at a pretax loss of $10.3 million ($6.7 million after-tax).

    Selected portfolios of securities purchased under agreements to resell, securities borrowed, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, securities loaned and certain non-collateralized short-term borrowings

            The Company reportselected the fair-value option retrospectively for our United States and United Kingdom portfolios of fixed-income securities purchased under agreements to resell and fixed-income securities sold under agreements to repurchase (and certain non-collateralized short-term borrowings). The fair-value option was also elected prospectively in the second quarter of 2007 for certain portfolios of fixed-income securities lending and borrowing transactions based in Japan. In each case, the election was made because the related interest-rate risk is managed on a numberportfolio basis, primarily with derivative instruments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings. Previously, these positions were accounted for on an accrual basis.

            Changes in fair value for transactions in these portfolios are recorded inPrincipal transactions. The related interest revenue and interest expense are measured based on the contractual rates specified in the transactions and are reported as interest revenue and expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

    Selected letters of credit and revolving loans hedged by credit default swaps or participation notes

            The Company has elected the fair-value option for certain letters of credit that are hedged with derivative instruments or participation notes. Upon electing the fair-value option, the related portions of the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for unfunded lending commitments were reversed. Citigroup elected the fair-value option for these transactions because the risk is managed on a fair-value basis and to mitigate accounting mismatches.

            The notional amount of these unfunded letters of credit was $1.4 billion as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008. The amount funded was insignificant with no amounts 90 days or more past due or on a non-accrual status at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.

            These items have been classified appropriately inTrading account assets orTrading account liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Changes in fair value of these items are classified inPrincipal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.

    Certain credit products

            Citigroup has elected the fair-value option for certain originated and purchased loans, including certain unfunded loan products, such as guarantees and letters of credit, executed by Citigroup's trading businesses. None of these credit products is a highly leveraged financing commitment. Significant groups of transactions include loans and unfunded loan products that are expected to be either sold or securitized in the near term, or transactions where the economic risks are hedged with derivative instruments such as held-for-sale,purchased credit default swaps or total return swaps where the Company pays the total return on the underlying loans to a third party. Citigroup has elected the fair-value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications. Fair value was not elected for most lending transactions across the Company, including where those management objectives would not be met.


            The following table provides information about certain credit products carried at fair value:

     
     March 31, 2009 December 31, 2008 
    In millions of dollars Trading
    assets
     Loans Trading
    assets
     Loans 
    Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet $13,047 $1,944 $16,254 $2,315 
    Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value $5,601 $13 $6,501 $3 
    Balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $243 $1,055 $77 $1,113 
    Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $114 $(1)$190 $(4)
              

            In addition to the amounts reported above, $75 million and $72 million of unfunded loan commitments related to certain credit products selected for fair-value accounting were outstanding as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.

            Changes in fair value of funded and unfunded credit products are classified inPrincipal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income. Related interest revenue is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported asInterest revenue on trading account assets or loans depending on their balance sheet classifications. The changes in fair value for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 due to instrument-specific credit risk totaled to a loss of $9 million and $16 million, respectively.

    Certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity method investments

            Citigroup invests in private equity and real estate ventures for the purpose of earning investment returns and for capital appreciation. The Company has elected the fair-value option for certain of these ventures, because such investments are considered similar to many private equity or hedge fund activities in our investment companies, which are measuredreported at fair value. The fair-value option brings consistency in the accounting and evaluation of certain of these investments. As required by SFAS 159, all investments (debt and equity) in such private equity and real estate entities are accounted for at fair value. These investments are classified asInvestments on Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet.

            Citigroup also holds various non-strategic investments in leveraged buyout funds and other hedge funds that previously were required to be accounted for under the equity method. The Company elected fair-value accounting to reduce operational and accounting complexity. Since the funds account for all of their underlying assets at fair value, the impact of applying the equity method to Citigroup's investment in these funds was equivalent to fair-value accounting. Thus, this fair-value election had no impact on openingRetained earnings. These investments are classified asOther assets on Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet.

            Changes in the fair values of these investments are classified inOther revenue in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.

    Certain structured liabilities

            The Company has elected the fair-value option for certain structured liabilities whose performance is linked to structured interest rates, inflation or currency risks ("structured liabilities"). The Company elected the fair-value option, because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and, therefore, are managed on a LOCOMfair-value basis. These positions will continue to be classified as debt, deposits or derivatives (Trading account liabilities) on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet according to their legal form.

            For those structured liabilities classified asLong-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected, the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeds the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $9 million as of March 31, 2009 and $277 million as of December 31, 2008.

            The change in fair value for these structured liabilities is reported inPrincipal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.

            Related interest expense is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the Consolidated Income Statement.

    Certain non-structured liabilities

            The Company has elected the fair-value option for certain non-structured liabilities with fixed and floating interest rates ("non-structured liabilities"). The Company has elected the fair-value option where the interest-rate risk of such liabilities is economically hedged with derivative contracts or the proceeds are used to purchase financial assets that will also be accounted for at fair value through earnings. The election has been made to mitigate accounting mismatches and to achieve operational simplifications. These positions are reported inShort-term borrowings andLong-term debt on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet.

            For those non-structured liabilities classified asShort-term borrowings for which the fair-value option has been elected, the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeds the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $12 million as of March 31, 2009 and the aggregate fair value exceeds the aggregate unpaid principal balance by $5 million as December 31, 2008.

            For non-structured liabilities classified asLong-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected, the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeded the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $95 million and $97 million as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The change in fair value for these non-structured liabilities is reported inPrincipal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.

            Related interest expense continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the Consolidated Income Statement.


    Certain mortgage loans

            Citigroup has elected the fair-value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans held-for-sale. These loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments. The Company has elected the fair-value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications. The fair-value option was not elected for loans held-for-investment, as those loans are not hedged with derivative instruments. This election was effective for applicable instruments originated or purchased on or after September 1, 2007.

            The following table provides information about certain mortgage loans carried at fair value:

    In millions of dollars March 31,
    2009
     December 31,
    2008
     
    Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet $5,256 $4,273 
    Aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principal balance $155 $138 
    Balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $10 $9 
    Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $6 $2 
          

            The changes in fair values of these mortgage loans is reported inOther revenue in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income. The changes in fair value during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008 due to instrument-specific credit risk resulted in a $5 million loss and $8 million loss, respectively. Related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

    Items selected for fair-value accounting in accordance with SFAS 155 and SFAS 156

    Certain hybrid financial instruments

            The Company has elected to apply fair-value accounting under SFAS 155 for certain hybrid financial assets and liabilities whose performance is linked to risks other than interest rate, foreign exchange or inflation (e.g., equity, credit or commodity risks). In addition, the Company has elected fair-value accounting under SFAS 155 for residual interests retained from securitizing certain financial assets.

            The Company has elected fair-value accounting for these instruments because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and, therefore, are managed on a fair-value basis. In addition, the accounting for these instruments is simplified under a fair-value approach as it eliminates the complicated operational requirements of bifurcating the embedded derivatives from the host contracts and accounting for each separately. The hybrid financial instruments are classified asTrading account assets, Loans,Deposits,Trading account liabilities (for prepaid derivatives),Short-term borrowings orLong-Term Debt on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet according to their legal form, while residual interests in certain securitizations are classified asTrading account assets.

            For hybrid financial instruments for which fair-value accounting has been elected under SFAS 155 and that are classified asLong-term debt, the aggregate unpaid principal exceeds the aggregate fair value by $2.4 billion and $1.9 billion as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The difference for those instruments classified asLoans is immaterial.

            Changes in fair value for hybrid financial instruments, which in most cases includes a component for accrued interest, are recorded inPrincipal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income. Interest accruals for certain hybrid instruments classified as trading assets are recorded separately from the change in fair value asInterest revenue in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.


    Mortgage servicing rights

            The Company accounts for mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) at fair value in accordance with SFAS 156. Fair value for MSRs is determined using an option-adjusted spread valuation approach. This approach consists of projecting servicing cash flows under multiple interest-rate scenarios and discounting these cash flows using risk-adjusted rates. The model assumptions used in the valuation of MSRs include mortgage prepayment speeds and discount rates. The fair value of such exposuresMSRs is determined, where possible, using quoted secondary-market prices and classifiedprimarily affected by changes in Level 2prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates. In managing this risk, the Company hedges a significant portion of the fair-value hierarchy if there is a sufficient levelvalues of activity inits MSRs through the marketuse of interest-rate derivative contracts, forward-purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities, and quotes or traded prices are available with suitable frequency.purchased securities classified as trading. See Note 15 for further discussions regarding the accounting and reporting of MSRs.

            However, due to the dislocation        These MSRs, which totaled $5.5 billion and $5.7 billion as of the credit marketsMarch 31, 2009 and the reduced market interest in higher risk/higher yield instruments during the second half of 2007 and first quarter ofDecember 31, 2008, liquidity in the market for highly leveraged financings has continued to decline significantly during that period. Therefore, a majority of such exposuresrespectively, are classified as Level 3 as quoted secondary market prices do not generally exist. TheMortgage servicing rights on Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet. Changes in fair value for such exposures is determined using quoted prices for a similar asset or asset, adjusted forof MSRs are recorded inCommissions and fees in the specific attributesCompany's Consolidated Statement of the loan being valued.Income.



    17.    Guarantees19.    GUARANTEES

            The Company provides a variety of guarantees and indemnifications to Citigroup customers to enhance their credit standing and enable them to complete a wide variety of business transactions. FASB Interpretation No. 45, "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others" (FIN 45), provides initial measurement and disclosure guidance in accounting for guarantees. FIN 45 requires that, for certain contracts meeting the definition of a guarantee, the guarantor must recognize, at inception, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee.

            In addition, the guarantor must disclose the maximum potential amount of future payments the guarantor could be required to make under the guarantee, if there were a total default by the guaranteed parties. The determination of the maximum potential future payments is based on the notional amount of the guarantees without consideration of possible recoveries under recourse provisions or from collateral held or pledged. Such amounts bear no relationship to the anticipated losses, if any, on these guarantees.

            The following tables present information about the Company's guarantees at March 31, 20082009 and December 31, 2007:2008:

     
     Maximum potential amount of future payments
      
    In billions of dollars at March 31, except carrying value in millions

     Expire within
    1 year

     Expire after
    1 year

     Total amount
    outstanding

     Carrying value
    (in millions)

    2008            
    Financial standby letters of credit $28.6 $53.3 $81.9 $149.5
    Performance guarantees  10.5  8.0  18.5  26.7
    Derivative instruments  98.5  267.4  365.9  30,548.7
    Loans sold with recourse    0.4  0.4  44.6
    Securities lending indemnifications(1)  163.3    163.3  
    Credit card merchant processing(1)  59.6    59.6  
    Custody indemnifications and other(1)    46.8  46.8  140.0
      
     
     
     
    Total $360.5 $375.9 $736.4 $30,909.5
      
     
     
     

     Maximum potential amount of future payments
      
    In billions of dollars at December 31, except carrying value in millions

     Expire within
    1 year

     Expire after
    1 year

     Total amount
    outstanding

     Carrying value
    (in millions)

    2007(2)        

     Maximum potential amount of future payments  
     
    In billions of dollars at March 31,
    except carrying value in millions
     Expire within
    1 year
     Expire after
    1 year
     Total amount
    outstanding
     Carrying value
    (in millions)
     
    2009 
    Financial standby letters of credit $43.5 $43.6 $87.1 $160.6 $63.8 $30.7 $94.5 $296.6 
    Performance guarantees 11.3 6.8 18.1 24.4 11.5 3.5 15.0 24.9 
    Derivative instruments 121.5 381.6 503.1 23,083.3
    Derivative instruments considered to be guarantees 9.3 4.3 13.6 2,259.1 
    Loans sold with recourse  0.5 0.5 45.5  0.3 0.3 54.8 
    Securities lending indemnifications(1) 153.4  153.4  33.8  33.8  
    Credit card merchant processing(1) 64.0  64.0  48.1  48.1  
    Custody indemnifications and other(1)  53.4 53.4 306.0
    Custody indemnifications and other  20.8 20.8 151.0 
     
     
     
     
             
    Total $393.7 $485.9 $879.6 $23,619.8 $166.5 $59.6 $226.1 $2,786.4 
     
     
     
     
             


     
     Maximum potential amount of future payments  
     
    In billions of dollars at December 31,
    except carrying value in millions
     Expire within
    1 year
     Expire after
    1 year
     Total amount
    outstanding
     Carrying value
    (in millions)
     
    2008             
    Financial standby letters of credit $31.6 $62.6 $94.2 $289.0 
    Performance guarantees  9.4  6.9  16.3  23.6 
    Derivative instruments considered to be guarantees(2)  7.6  7.2  14.8  1,308.4 
    Guarantees of collection of contractual cash flows(1)    0.3  0.3   
    Loans sold with recourse    0.3  0.3  56.4 
    Securities lending indemnifications(1)  47.6    47.6   
    Credit card merchant processing(1)  56.7    56.7   
    Custody indemnifications and other    21.6  21.6  149.2 
              
    Total $152.9 $98.9 $251.8 $1,826.6 
              

    (1)
    The carrying values of guarantees of collections of contractual cash flows, securities lending indemnifications and credit card merchant processing and custody indemnifications are not material, as the Company has determined that the amount and probability of potential liabilities arising from these guarantees are not significant and the carrying amount of the Company's obligations under these guarantees is immaterial.significant.

    (2)
    Reclassified to conform to the current period'speriod presentation.

    Financial Standby Letters of Credit

            Citigroup issues standby letters of credit which substitute its own credit for that of the borrower. If a letter of credit is drawn down, the borrower is obligated to repay Citigroup. Standby letters of credit protect a third party from defaults on contractual obligations. Financial standby letters of credit include guarantees of payment of insurance premiums and reinsurance risks that support industrial revenue bond underwriting and settlement of payment obligations to clearing houses, and also support options and purchases of securities or are in lieu of escrow deposit accounts. Financial standbys also backstop loans, credit facilities, promissory notes and trade acceptances.

    Performance Guarantees

            Performance guarantees and letters of credit are issued to guarantee a customer's tender bid on a construction or systems installationsystems-installation project or to guarantee completion of such projects in accordance with contract terms. They are also issued to support a customer's obligation to supply specified products, commodities, or maintenance or warranty services to a third party.

    Derivative Instruments Considered to Be Guarantees

            Derivatives are financial instruments whose cash flows are based on a notional amount or an underlying instrument, where there is little or no initial investment, and whose terms require or permit net settlement.

            The main use Derivatives may be used for a variety of derivatives isreasons, including risk management, or to reduce risk for one party while offering the potential for high return (at increased risk) to another.enhance returns. Financial institutions often act as intermediaries for their clients, helping clients reduce their risks. However, derivatives may also be used to take a risk position. Certain

            The derivative contracts entered into byinstruments considered guarantees, which are presented in the Company meettable above, include only those instruments that require Citi to make payments to the definition of a guarantee, including credit default swaps, total return swaps and certain written options. However, credit derivatives (that is, credit default swaps and total return swaps) with banks and broker-dealers are


    excluded from this definition as thesecounterparty based on changes in an underlying that is related to an asset, a liability, or an equity security held by the guaranteed party. More specifically, derivative instruments considered guarantees include certain over-the-counter written put options where the counterparty is not a bank, hedge fund or broker-dealer (such counterparties are considered to be dealers in these instruments withmarkets, and may therefore not hold the primary purpose of taking a risk position.underlying instruments). However, credit derivatives sold by the Company are excluded from this presentation, as they are disclosed separately within this note below. In addition, non-credit derivative contracts that are cash settled and for which the Company is unable to assert that it is probable the counterparty held the underlying instrument at the inception of the contract are also not considered guarantees under FIN 45. Accordingly, these contracts are excluded from the disclosure above.

            In instances where the Company's maximum potential future payment is unlimited, such as in certain written foreign currency options, the notional amount of the contract is disclosed.

    Guarantees of Collection of Contractual Cash Flows

            Guarantees of collection of contractual cash flows protect investors in credit card receivables securitization trusts from loss of interest relating to insufficient collections on the underlying receivables in the trusts. The notional amount of these guarantees as of December 31, 2008 is $300 million. No such guarantees were outstanding at March 31, 2009.

    Loans Sold with Recourse

            Loans sold with recourse represent the Company's obligations to reimburse the buyers for loan losses under certain circumstances. Recourse refers to the clause in a sales agreement under which a lender will fully reimburse the buyer/investor for any losses resulting from the purchased loans. This may be accomplished by the seller's taking back any loans that become delinquent.

    Securities Lending Indemnifications

            Owners of securities frequently lend those securities for a fee to other parties who may sell them short or deliver them to another party to satisfy some other obligation. Banks may administer such securities lending programs for their clients. Securities lending indemnifications are issued by the bank to guarantee that a securities lending customer will be made whole in the event that the security borrower does not return the security subject to the lending agreement and collateral held is insufficient to cover the market value of the security.

    Credit Card Merchant Processing

            Credit card merchant processing guarantees represent the Company's indirect obligations in connection with the processing of private label and bankcard transactions on behalf of merchants.

    Custody Indemnifications

            Custody indemnifications are issued to guarantee that custody clients will be made whole in the event that a third-party subcustodian fails to safeguard clients' assets. Beginning with the 2006 third quarter, the scope of the custody indemnifications was broadened to cover all clients' assets held by third-party subcustodians.

    Other

            In the fourth quarter of 2007, Citigroup recorded a $306 million (pretax) charge related to certain of Visa USA's litigation matters. In March 2008, in connection with the IPO, Visa used a portion of its IPO proceeds to fund an escrow account with respect to those litigation matters. This has enabled Citigroup to recognize a $166 million (pretax) reduction of its $306 million reserve. The carrying value of the reserve is included in Other liabilities.

    Other Guarantees and Indemnifications

            Citigroup's primary credit card business is the issuance of credit cards to individuals. In addition, the Company provides transaction processing services to various merchants with respect to bankcard and private labelprivate-label cards. In the event of a billing dispute with respect to a bankcard transaction between a merchant and a cardholder that is ultimately resolved in the cardholder's favor, the third party holds the primary contingent liability to credit or refund the amount to the cardholder and charge back the transaction to the merchant. If the third party is unable to collect this amount from the merchant, it bears the loss for the amount of the credit or refund paid to the cardholder.

            The Company continues to have the primary contingent liability with respect to its portfolio of private labelprivate-label merchants. The risk of loss is mitigated as the cash flows between the third party or the Company and the merchant are settled on a net basis and the third party or the Company has the right to offset any payments with cash flows otherwise due to the merchant. To further mitigate this risk, the third party or the Company may require a merchant to make an escrow deposit, delay settlement, or include event triggers to provide the third party or the Company with more financial and operational control in the event of the financial deterioration of the merchant, or require various credit enhancements (including letters of credit and bank guarantees). In the unlikely event that a private label merchant is unable to deliver products, services or a refund to its private label cardholders, Citigroup is contingently liable to credit or refund cardholders. In addition, although a third party holds the primary contingent liability with respect to the processing of bankcard transactions, in the event that the third party does not have sufficient collateral from the merchant or sufficient financial resources of its own to provide the credit or refunds to the cardholders, Citigroup would be liable to credit or refund the cardholders.

            The Company's maximum potential contingent liability related to both bankcard and private label merchant processing services is estimated to be the total volume of credit card transactions that meet the requirements to be valid chargeback transactions at any given time. At March 31, 20082009 and December 31, 2007,2008, this maximum potential exposure was estimated to be $60$48 billion and $64$57 billion, respectively.

            However, the Company believes that the maximum exposure is not representative of the actual potential loss exposure based on the Company's historical experience and its position as a secondary guarantor (in the case of bankcards). In most cases, this contingent liability is unlikely to arise, as most products and services are delivered when purchased and amounts are refunded when items are returned to merchants. The Company assesses the probability and amount of its contingent liability related to merchant processing based on the financial strength of the primary guarantor (in the case of bankcards) and the extent and nature of unresolved chargebacks and its historical loss experience. At March 31, 20082009 and December 31, 2007,2008, the estimated losses incurred and the carrying amounts of the Company's contingent obligations related to merchant processing activities were immaterial.

            In addition,Custody Indemnifications

            Custody indemnifications are issued to guarantee that custody clients will be made whole in the event that a third-party subcustodian or depository institution fails to safeguard clients' assets.

    Other

            As of December 31, 2008, Citigroup carried a reserve of $149 million related to certain of Visa USA's litigation matters. As of March 31, 2009, the carrying value of the reserve was $151 


    million. This reserve is included inOther liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

    Other Guarantees and Indemnifications

            The Company, through its credit card business, provides various cardholder protection programs on several of its card products, including programs that provide insurance coverage for rental cars, coverage for certain losses associated with purchased products, price protection for certain purchases and protection for lost luggage. These guarantees are not included in the table, since the total


    outstanding amount of the guarantees and the Company's maximum exposure to loss cannot be quantified. The protection is limited to certain types of purchases and certain types of losses and it is not possible to quantify the purchases that would qualify for these benefits at any given time. The Company assesses the probability and amount of its potential liability related to these programs based on the extent and nature of its historical loss experience. At March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the actual and estimated losses incurred and the carrying value of the Company's obligations related to these programs were immaterial.

            In the normal course of business, the Company provides standard representations and warranties to counterparties in contracts in connection with numerous transactions and also provides indemnifications that protect the counterparties to the contracts in the event that additional taxes are owed due either to a change in the tax law or an adverse interpretation of the tax law. Counterparties to these transactions provide the Company with comparable indemnifications. While such representations, warranties and tax indemnifications are essential components of many contractual relationships, they do not represent the underlying business purpose for the transactions. The indemnification clauses are often standard contractual terms related to the Company's own performance under the terms of a contract and are entered into in the normal course of business based on an assessment that the risk of loss is remote. Often these clauses are intended to ensure that terms of a contract are met at inception (for example, that loans transferred to a counterparty in a sales transaction did in fact meet the conditions specified in the contract at the transfer date). No compensation is received for these standard representations and warranties, and it is not possible to determine their fair value because they rarely, if ever, result in a payment. In many cases, there are no stated or notional amounts included in the indemnification clauses and the contingencies potentially triggering the obligation to indemnify have not occurred and are not expected to occur. There are no amounts reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31, 20082009 and December 31, 2007,2008, related to these indemnifications and they are not included in the table.

            In addition, the Company is a member of or shareholder in hundreds of value transfervalue-transfer networks (VTNs) (payment clearing and settlement systems as well as securities exchanges) around the world. As a condition of membership, many of these VTNs require that members stand ready to backstop the net effect on the VTNs of a member's default on its obligations. The Company's potential obligations as a shareholder or member of VTN associations are excluded from the scope of FIN 45, since the shareholders and members represent subordinated classes of investors in the VTNs. Accordingly, the Company's participation in VTNs is not reported in the table and there are no amounts reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31, 20082009 or December 31, 20072008 for potential obligations that could arise from the Company's involvement with VTN associations.

            At March 31, 20082009 and December 31, 2007,2008, the total carrying amounts of the liabilities related to the guarantees and indemnifications included in the table amounted to approximately $31 billion$2,786 million and $24 billion,$1,827 million, respectively. The carrying value of derivative instruments is included in eitherTrading liabilities orOther liabilities, depending upon whether the derivative was entered into for trading or non-trading purposes. The carrying value of financial and performance guarantees is included inOther liabilities.liabilities. For loans sold with recourse, the carrying value of the liability is included inOther liabilities.liabilities. In addition, at March 31, 20082009 and December 31, 2007, 2008,Other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet include an allowance for credit losses of $1.25 billion$947 million and $887 million relating to letters of credit and unfunded lending commitments.commitments, respectively.

            In addition to the collateral available in respect of the credit card merchant processing contingent liability discussed above, the Company has collateral available to reimburse potential losses on its other guarantees.Collateral

            Cash collateral available to the Company to reimburse losses realized under these guarantees and indemnifications amounted to $104$25 billion and $112$33 billion at March 31, 20082009 and December 31, 2007,2008, respectively. Securities and other marketable assets held as collateral amounted to $72$18 billion and $54$27 billion, andthe majority of which collateral is held to reimburse losses realized under securities lending indemnifications. The decrease from December 31, 2008 is in line with the decrease in the notional amount of these indemnifications, which are collateralized. Additionally, letters of credit in favor of the Company held as collateral amounted to $498$597 million and $192$503 million at March 31, 20082009 and December 31, 2007,2008, respectively. Other property may also be available to the Company to cover losses under certain guarantees and indemnifications; however, the value of such property has not been determined.

    Performance Risk

            Citigroup evaluates the performance risk of its guarantees based on the assigned referenced counterparty internal or external ratings. Where external ratings are used, investment-grade ratings are considered to be Baa/BBB and above, while anything below is considered non-investment grade. The Citigroup internal ratings are in line with the related external rating system. On certain underlying referenced credits or entities, ratings are not available. Such referenced credits are included in the "Not-rated" category. The maximum potential amount of the future payments related to guarantees and credit derivatives sold is determined to be the notional amount of these contracts, which is the par amount of the assets guaranteed.

            Presented in the tables below is the maximum potential amount of future payments classified based upon internal and external credit ratings as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008. As previously mentioned, the determination of the maximum potential future payments is based on the notional


    amount of the guarantees without consideration of possible recoveries under recourse provisions or from collateral held or pledged. Such amounts bear no relationship to the anticipated losses, if any, on these guarantees.

     
     Maximum potential amount of future payments 
    In billions of dollars as of March 31, 2009 Investment
    grade
     Non-investment
    grade
     Not rated Total 
    Financial standby letters of credit $36.4 $28.5 $29.6 $94.5 
    Performance guarantees  5.9  3.8  5.3  15.0 
    Derivative instruments deemed to be guarantees      13.6  13.6 
    Loans sold with recourse      0.3  0.3 
    Securities lending indemnifications      33.8  33.8 
    Credit card merchant processing      48.1  48.1 
    Custody indemnifications and other  17.6  3.2    20.8 
              
    Total $59.9 $35.5 $130.7 $226.1 
              


     
     Maximum potential amount of future payments 
    In billions of dollars as of December 31, 2008 Investment grade Non-investment grade Not rated Total 
    Financial standby letters of credit $49.2 $28.6 $16.4 $94.2 
    Performance guarantees  5.7  5.0  5.6  16.3 
    Derivative instruments deemed to be guarantees      14.8  14.8 
    Guarantees of collection of contractual cash flows      0.3  0.3 
    Loans sold with recourse      0.3  0.3 
    Securities lending indemnifications      47.6  47.6 
    Credit card merchant processing      56.7  56.7 
    Custody indemnifications and other  18.5  3.1    21.6 
              
    Total $73.4 $36.7 $141.7 $251.8 
              

    Credit Derivatives

            A credit derivative is a bilateral contract between a buyer and a seller under which the seller agrees to provide protection to the buyer against the credit risk of a particular entity ("reference entity" or "reference credit"). Credit derivatives generally require that the seller of credit protection make payments to the buyer upon the occurrence of predefined credit events (commonly referred to as "settlement triggers"). These settlement triggers are defined by the form of the derivative and the reference credit and are generally limited to the market standard of failure to pay on indebtedness and bankruptcy of the reference credit and, in a more limited range of transactions, debt restructuring. Credit derivative transactions referring to emerging market reference credits will also typically include additional settlement triggers to cover the acceleration of indebtedness and the risk of repudiation or a payment moratorium. In certain transactions, protection may be provided on a portfolio of referenced credits or asset-backed securities. The seller of such protection may not be required to make payment until a specified amount of losses has occurred with respect to the portfolio and/or may only be required to pay for losses up to a specified amount.

            The Company makes markets in and trades a range of credit derivatives, both on behalf of clients as well as for its own account. Through these contracts, the Company either purchases or writes protection on either a single name or a portfolio of reference credits. The Company uses credit derivatives to help mitigate credit risk in its corporate loan portfolio and other cash positions, to take proprietary trading positions, and to facilitate client transactions.

            The range of credit derivatives sold includes credit default swaps, total return swaps and credit options.

            A credit default swap is a contract in which, for a fee, a protection seller (guarantor) agrees to reimburse a protection buyer (beneficiary) for any losses that occur due to a credit event on a reference entity. If there is no credit default event or settlement trigger, as defined by the specific derivative contract, then the guarantor makes no payments to the beneficiary and receives only the contractually specified fee. However, if a credit event occurs as defined in the specific derivative contract sold, the guarantor will be required to make a payment to the beneficiary.

            A total return swap transfers the total economic performance of a reference asset, which includes all associated cash flows, as well as capital appreciation or depreciation. The protection buyer (beneficiary) receives a floating rate of interest and any depreciation on the reference asset from the protection seller (guarantor) and, in return, the protection seller receives the cash flows associated with the reference asset plus any appreciation. Thus, according to the total return swap agreement, the beneficiary will be obligated to make a payment any time the floating interest rate payment and any depreciation of the reference asset exceed the cash flows associated with the underlying asset. A total return swap may terminate upon a default of the reference asset subject to the provisions of the related total return swap agreement between the protection seller (guarantor) and the protection buyer (beneficiary).

            A credit option is a credit derivative that allows investors to trade or hedge changes in the credit quality of the reference


    asset. For example, in a credit spread option, the option writer (guarantor) assumes the obligation to purchase or sell the reference asset at a specified "strike" spread level. The option purchaser (beneficiary) buys the right to sell the reference asset to, or purchase it from, the option writer at the strike spread level. The payments on credit spread options depend either on a particular credit spread or the price of the underlying credit-sensitive asset. The options usually terminate if the underlying assets default.

            A credit-linked note is a form of credit derivative structured as a debt security with an embedded credit default swap. The purchaser of the note writes credit protection to the issuer, and receives a return which will be negatively affected by credit events on the underlying reference credit. If the reference entity defaults, the purchaser of the credit-linked note may assume the long position in the debt security and any future cash flows from it, but will lose the amount paid to the issuer of the credit-linked note. Thus the maximum amount of the exposure is the carrying amount of the credit-linked note. As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the amount of credit-linked notes held by the Company in trading inventory was immaterial.

            The following tables summarize the key characteristics of the Company's credit derivative portfolio as protection seller (guarantor) as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008:

    In millions of dollars as of March 31, 2009 Maximum potential
    amount of
    future payments
     Fair value
    payable
     
    By industry/counterparty       
    Bank $919,354 $123,437 
    Broker-dealer  345,582  56,181 
    Monoline  139  91 
    Non-financial  5,327  5,121 
    Insurance and other financial institutions  135,729  21,581 
          
    Total by industry/counterparty $1,406,131 $206,411 
          
    By instrument:       
    Credit default swaps and options $1,404,928 $206,057 
    Total return swaps and other  1,203  354 
          
    Total by instrument $1,406,131 $206,411 
          
    By rating:       
    Investment grade $808,602 $88,952 
    Non-investment grade  362,851  79,409 
    Not rated  234,678  38,050 
          
    Total by rating $1,406,131 $206,411 
          


    In millions of dollars as of December 31, 2008 Maximum potential
    amount of
    future payments
     Fair value
    payable
     
    By industry/counterparty       
    Bank $943,949 $118,428 
    Broker-dealer  365,664  55,458 
    Monoline  139  91 
    Non-financial  7,540  2,556 
    Insurance and other financial institutions  125,988  21,700 
          
    Total by industry/counterparty $1,443,280 $198,233 
          
    By instrument:       
    Credit default swaps and options $1,441,375 $197,981 
    Total return swaps and other  1,905  252 
          
    Total by instrument $1,443,280 $198,233 
          
    By rating:       
    Investment grade $851,426 $83,672 
    Non-investment grade  410,483  87,508 
    Not rated  181,371  27,053 
          
    Total by rating $1,443,280 $198,233 
          

            Citigroup evaluates the payment/performance risk of the credit derivatives to which it stands as guarantor based on the credit rating which has been assigned to the underlying referenced credit. Where external ratings by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations (such as Moody's and S&P), are used, investment grade ratings are considered to be Baa/BBB or above, while anything below is considered non-investment grade. The Citigroup internal ratings are in line with the related external credit rating system. On certain underlying referenced credit, mainly related to over-the-counter credit derivatives, ratings are not available, and these are included in the not-rated category. Credit derivatives written on an underlying non-investment grade referenced credit represent greater payment risk to the Company. The non-investment grade category in the table above primarily includes credit derivatives where the underlying referenced entity has been downgraded subsequent to the inception of the derivative.


    Credit Commitments

            The table below summarizes Citigroup's other commitments as of March 31, 20082009 and December 31, 2007.2008.

    In millions of dollars

     U.S.
     Outside of
    U.S.

     March 31,
    2008

     December 31,
    2007

     U.S. Outside
    U.S.
     March 31,
    2009
     December 31,
    2008
     
    Commercial and similar letters of credit $1,650 $8,099 $9,749 $9,175 $2,085 $5,233 $7,318 $8,215 
    One- to four-family residential mortgages 5,893 763 6,656 4,587 734 258 992 937 
    Revolving open-end loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties 30,266 3,346 33,612 35,187 24,611 2,573 27,184 25,212 
    Commercial real estate, construction and land development 3,291 812 4,103 4,834 1,744 581 2,325 2,702 
    Credit card lines 961,838 157,858 1,119,696 1,103,535 750,451 126,881 877,332 1,002,437 
    Commercial and other consumer loan commitments 295,614 160,897 456,511 473,631 199,803 86,558 286,361 309,997 
     
     
     
     
             
    Total $1,298,552 $331,775 $1,630,327 $1,630,949 $979,428 $222,084 $1,201,512 $1,349,500 
     
     
     
     
             

            The majority of unused commitments are contingent upon customers' maintaining specific credit standards. Commercial commitments generally have floating interest rates and fixed expiration dates and may require payment of fees. Such fees (net of certain direct costs) are deferred and, upon exercise of the commitment, amortized over the life of the loan or, if exercise is deemed remote, amortized over the commitment period.

    Commercial and similar letters of credit

            A commercial letter of credit is an instrument by which Citigroup substitutes its credit for that of a customer to enable the customers to finance the purchase of goods or to incur


    other commitments. Citigroup issues a letter on behalf of its client to a supplier and agrees to pay them upon presentation of documentary evidence that the supplier has performed in accordance with the terms of the letter of credit. When drawn, the customer then is required to reimburse Citigroup.

    One- to four-family residential mortgages

            A one- to four-family residential mortgage commitment is a written confirmation from Citigroup to a seller of a property that the bank will advance the specified sums enabling the buyer to complete the purchase.

    Revolving open-end loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties

            Revolving open-end loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties are essentially home equity lines of credit. A home equity line of credit is a loan secured by a primary residence or second home to the extent of the excess of fair market value over the debt outstanding for the first mortgage.

    Commercial Real Estate, Construction and Land Development

            Commercial real estate, construction and land development include unused portions of commitments to extend credit for the purpose of financing commercial and multifamily residential properties as well as land development projects. Both secured by realsecured-by-real estate and unsecured commitments are included in this line. In addition, undistributed loan proceeds where there is an obligation to advance for construction progress, payments are also included.included in this line. However, this line only includes those extensions of credit that once funded will be classified as Loans on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

    Credit card lines

            Citigroup provides credit to customers by issuing credit cards. The credit card lines are unconditionally cancellable by the issuer.

    Commercial and other consumer loan commitments

            Commercial and other consumer loan commitments include commercial commitments to make or purchase loans, to purchase third-party receivables and to provide note issuance or revolving underwriting facilities. Amounts include $238$130 billion and $259$140 billion with an original maturity of less than one year at March 31, 20082009 and December 31, 2007,2008, respectively.

    In addition, included in this line item are highly leveraged financing commitments which are agreements that provide funding to a borrower with higher levels of debt (measured by the ratio of debt capital to equity capital of the borrower) than is generally considered normal for other companies. This type of financing is commonly employed in corporate acquisitions, management buy-outs and similar transactions.



    18.    Contingencies
    20.    CONTINGENCIES

            As described in the "Legal Proceedings" discussion on page 119, theThe Company has beenis a defendant in numerous lawsuits and other legal proceedings, arising out of alleged misconduct in connection with:

            As of March 31, 2008, the Company's litigation reserve for these matters, net of amounts previously paid or not yet paid but committed to be paid in connection with the Enron class action settlement, the Enron bankruptcy and credit-linked notes settlements described under "Legal Proceedings" on page 119, and other settlements arising out of these matters, was approximately $1.1 billion. The Company believes that this reserve is adequate to meet all of its remaining exposure for these matters.

            As described in the "Legal Proceedings" discussion on page 119, the Company is also a defendant in numerous lawsuits and other legal proceedingsProceedings," arising out of alleged misconduct in connection with othercertain matters. In view of the large number of litigationsuch matters, the uncertainties of the timing and outcome of this type of litigation, the novel issues presented, and the significant amounts involved, it is possible that the ultimate costs of these matters may exceed or be below the Company's litigation reserves. The Company will continue to defend itself vigorously in these cases, and seek to resolve them in the manner management believes is in the best interests of the Company.

            In addition, in the ordinary course of business, Citigroup and its subsidiaries are defendants or co-defendants or parties in various litigation and regulatory matters incidental to and typical of the businesses in which they are engaged. In the opinion of the Company's management, the ultimate resolution of these legal and regulatory proceedings would not be likely to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition of the Company but, if involving monetary liability, may be material to the Company's operating results for any particular period.


    19.   Citibank,21.   CITIBANK, N.A. Stockholder's EquityEQUITY

    Statement of Changes in Stockholder's Equity (Unaudited)


     Three Months Ended March 31,
      Three Months Ended March 31, 
    In millions of dollars, except shares
     2008
     2007
      2009 2008 
    Common stock ($20 par value)      
    Balance, beginning of period—Shares: 37,534,553 in 2008 and 2007 $751 $751 
    Balance, beginning of period—Shares: 37,534,553 in 2009 and 2008 $751 $751 
     
     
          
    Balance, end of period—Shares: 37,534,553 in 2008 and 2007 $751 $751 
    Balance, end of period—Shares: 37,534,553 in 2009 and 2008 $751 $751 
     
     
          
    Surplus      
    Balance, beginning of period $69,135 $43,753  $74,767 $69,135 
    Capital contribution from parent company 18 2,030  27,451 18 
    Employee benefit plans 1 11  1 1 
     
     
          
    Balance, end of period $69,154 $45,794  $102,219 $69,154 
     
     
          
    Retained earnings      
    Balance, beginning of period $31,915 $30,358  $21,735 $31,915 
    Adjustment to opening balance, net of taxes(1)  (96) 402  
     
     
          
    Adjusted balance, beginning of period $31,915 $30,262  $22,137 $31,915 
    Net income (loss) (881) 2,155  1,470 (881)
    Dividends paid (8) (18)  (8)
    Other(2) 117  
     
     
          
    Balance, end of period $31,026 $32,399  $23,724 $31,026 
     
     
          
    Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)      
    Balance, beginning of period $(2,495)$(1,709) $(15,895)$(2,495)
    Adjustment to opening balance, net of taxes(2)  (1)
    Adjustment to opening balance, net of taxes(1) (402)  
     
     
          
    Adjusted balance, beginning of period $(2,495)$(1,710) $(16,297)$(2,495)
    Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities available-for-sale, net of taxes (1,942) 130  (125) (1,942)
    Net change in foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes 799 141 
    Net change in FX translation adjustment, net of taxes (2,106) 799 
    Net change in cash flow hedges, net of taxes (1,008) (270) 1,131 (1,008)
    Pension liability adjustment, net of taxes 48 67  24 48 
     
     
          
    Net change in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) $(2,103)$68  $(1,076)$(2,103)
     
     
          
    Balance, end of period $(4,598)$(1,642) $(17,373)$(4,598)
     
     
          
    Total common stockholder's equity and total stockholder's equity $96,333 $77,302 
    Total Citibank common stockholder's equity and total Citibank stockholder's equity $109,321 $96,333 
         
    Noncontrolling interest 
    Balance, beginning of period 1,082 1,266 
    Transactions between Citi and the noncontrolling interest shareholders (130)  
    Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest shareholders 8 25 
    Dividends paid to noncontrolling interest shareholders (6) (6)
    Accumulated other comprehensive income—Net change in unrealized gains and losses on investments securities, net of tax (3) 1 
    Accumulated other comprehensive income—Net change in FX translation adjustment, net of tax (86) 69 
    All other (5) (2)
         
    Net change in noncontrolling interest $(222)$87 
         
    Balance, end of period $860 $1,353 
         
    Total equity $110,181 $97,686 
     
     
          
    Comprehensive income (loss)      
    Net income (loss) $(881)$2,155  $1,478 $(856)
    Net change in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (2,103) 68  (1,165) (2,033)
     
     
          
    Comprehensive income (loss) $(2,984)$2,223  $313 $(2,889)
    Comprehensive income attributable to the noncontrolling interest 81 (95)
     
     
          
    Comprehensive income attributable to Citibank $394 $(2,984)
         

    (1)
    The adjustment to opening balance for Retained earnings represents the total of the after-tax gain (loss) amounts for the adoption of the following accounting pronouncements:

    SFAS 157 for $9 million,

    SFAS 159 for $15 million,

    FSP 13-2 for $(142) million, and

    FIN 48 for $22 million.
    (2)
    The after-tax adjustment to the opening balance of balances forRetained earnings andAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss) represents represent the reclassificationcumulative effect of initially adopting FSP FAS 115-2. (See Note 1 for further disclosure).

    (2)
    Represents the unrealized gains (losses) related to several miscellaneous items previously reportedaccounting in accordance with SFAS 115. The related unrealized gains141,Business Combinations for the transfers of assets and losses were reclassified to retained earnings uponliabilities between Citibank, N.A and other affiliates under the adoptioncommon control of the fair value option in accordance with SFAS 159. See Notes 1 and 16 on pages 65 and 95 for further discussions.Citigroup.

    20.   Condensed Consolidating Financial Statement Schedules22.    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

            These unaudited condensed consolidating financial statement schedules are presented for purposes of additional analysis but should be considered in relation to the consolidated financial statements of Citigroup taken as a whole.

    Citigroup Parent Company

            The holding company, Citigroup Inc.

    Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. (CGMHI)

            Citigroup guarantees various debt obligations of CGMHI as well as all of the outstanding debt obligations under CGMHI's publicly issued debt.

    Citigroup Funding Inc. (CFI)

            CFI is a first-tier subsidiary of Citigroup, which issues commercial paper, medium-term notes and structured equity-linked and credit-linked notes, all of which are guaranteed by Citigroup.

    CitiFinancial Credit Company (CCC)

            An indirect wholly-ownedwholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup. CCC is a wholly-ownedwholly owned subsidiary of Associates. Citigroup has issued a full and unconditional guarantee of the outstanding indebtedness of CCC.

    Associates First Capital Corporation (Associates)

            A wholly-ownedwholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup. Citigroup has issued a full and unconditional guarantee of the outstanding long-term debt securities and commercial paper of Associates. In addition, Citigroup guaranteed various debt obligations of Citigroup Finance Canada Inc. (CFCI), a wholly-ownedwholly owned subsidiary of Associates. CFCI continues to issue debt in the Canadian market supported by a Citigroup guarantee. Associates is the immediate parent company of CCC.

    Other Citigroup Subsidiaries

            Includes all other subsidiaries of Citigroup, intercompany eliminations, and intercompany eliminations.income/loss from discontinued operations.

    Consolidating Adjustments

            Includes Citigroup parent company elimination of distributed and undistributed income of subsidiaries, investment in subsidiaries and the elimination of CCC, which is included in the Associates column.


    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOMETable of Contents

     
     Three Months Ended March 31, 2008
     
    In millions of dollars

     Citigroup parent company
     CGMHI
     CFI
     CCC
     Associates
     Other Citigroup subsidiaries, eliminations
     Consolidating adjustments
     Citigroup consolidated
     
    Revenues                         
    Dividends from subsidiary banks and bank holding companies $1,366 $ $ $ $ $ $(1,366)$ 
    Interest revenue  134  5,824    1,812  2,092  21,900  (1,812) 29,950 
    Interest revenue—intercompany  1,306  445  1,412  11  151  (3,314) (11)  
    Interest expense  2,291  4,063  961  41  175  8,987  (41) 16,477 
    Interest expense—intercompany  (27) 1,406  108  624  693  (2,180) (624)  
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Net interest revenue $(824)$800 $343 $1,158 $1,375 $11,779 $(1,158)$13,473 
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Commissions and fees $ $2,233 $ $20 $47 $(609)$(20)$1,671 
    Commissions and fees—intercompany  (10) 72    7  11  (73) (7)  
    Principal transactions  958  (7,568) 816    (4) (863)   (6,661)
    Principal transactions—intercompany  (284) 176  (582)   23  667     
    Other income  (1,756) 964  (66) 109  134  5,460  (109) 4,736 
    Other income—intercompany  1,306  540  70  7  26  (1,942) (7)  
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Total non-interest revenues $214 $(3,583)$238 $143 $237 $2,640 $(143)$(254)
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Total revenues, net of interest expense $756 $(2,783)$581 $1,301 $1,612 $14,419 $(2,667)$13,219 
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims $ $16 $ $989 $1,086 $4,924 $(989)$6,026 
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Expenses                         
    Compensation and benefits $(7)$2,804 $ $198 $274 $6,009 $(198)$9,080 
    Compensation and benefits— intercompany  2  236    49  50  (288) (49)  
    Other expense  49  959    125  167  5,961  (125) 7,136 
    Other expense—intercompany  33  329  15  81  104  (481) (81)  
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Total operating expenses $77 $4,328 $15 $453 $595 $11,201 $(453)$16,216 
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Income (loss) before taxes, minority interest, and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries $679 $(7,127)$566 $(141)$(69)$(1,706)$(1,225)$(9,023)
    Income taxes (benefits)  (437) (2,744) 200  (45) (16) (894) 45  (3,891)
    Minority interest, net of taxes            (21)   (21)
    Equities in undistributed income of subsidiaries  (6,227)           6,227   
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Net income (loss) $(5,111)$(4,383)$366 $(96)$(53)$(791)$4,957 $(5,111)
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME


     Three Months Ended March 31, 2007
     Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 
    In millions of dollars

     Citigroup parent company
     CGMHI
     CFI
     CCC
     Associates
     Other Citigroup subsidiaries, eliminations
     Consolidating adjustments
     Citigroup Consolidated
     Citigroup
    parent
    company
     CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
    Citigroup
    subsidiaries,
    eliminations
     Consolidating
    adjustments
     Citigroup
    consolidated
     
    Revenues                         
    Dividends from subsidiary banks and bank holding companies $2,805 $ $ $ $ $ $(2,805)$ $19 $ $ $ $ $ $(19)$ 
    Interest revenue  97  7,282    1,524  1,791  19,004  (1,524) 28,174 120 2,269  1,633 1,864 16,356 (1,633) 20,609 
    Interest revenue—intercompany  1,284  295  1,245  37  123  (2,947) (37)  802 708 1,060 10 116 (2,686) (10)  
    Interest expense  1,790  5,722  891  46  181  8,978  (46) 17,562 2,224 691 516 25 102 4,178 (25) 7,711 
    Interest expense—intercompany  (13) 1,170  191  496  660  (2,008) (496)  (236) 1,099 179 576 470 (1,512) (576)  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
                     
    Net interest revenue $(396)$685 $163 $1,019 $1,073 $9,087 $(1,019)$10,612 $(1,066)$1,187 $365 $1,042 $1,408 $11,004 $(1,042)$12,898 
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
                     
    Commissions and fees $ $2,847 $ $18 $41 $2,714 $(18)$5,602 $ $1,653 $ $11 $30 $2,643 $(11)$4,326 
    Commissions and fees—intercompany    25    5  5  (30) (5)   33  19 21 (54) (19)  
    Principal transactions  6  1,066  (128)     2,224    3,168 (357) (1,704) 986  (2) 4,871  3,794 
    Principal transactions—intercompany  3  112  1      (116)    143 3,138 (673)  (10) (2,598)   
    Other income  26  1,120  52  107  146  4,733  (107) 6,077 3,522 702 (40) 102 148 (561) (102) 3,771 
    Other income—intercompany  41  382  (44) 7  (16) (363) (7)  (2,369) 18 30  24 2,297   
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
                     
    Total non-interest revenues $76 $5,552 $(119)$137 $176 $9,162 $(137)$14,847 $939 $3,840 $303 $132 $211 $6,598 $(132)$11,891 
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
                     
    Total revenues, net of interest expense $2,485 $6,237 $44 $1,156 $1,249 $18,249 $(3,961)$25,459 $(108)$5,027 $668 $1,174 $1,619 $17,602 $(1,193)$24,789 
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
                     
    Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims $ $7 $ $426 $478 $2,482 $(426)$2,967 $ $24 $ $956 $1,051 $9,232 $(956)$10,307 
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
                     
    Expenses                         
    Compensation and benefits $21 $3,613 $ $160 $214 $4,851 $(160)$8,699 $(50)$1,857 $ $120 $148 $4,464 $(120)$6,419 
    Compensation and benefits—intercompany  2      40  41  (43) (40)  2 193   37 (232)   
    Other expense  114  988    155  206  5,564  (155) 6,872 228 659 1 109 147 4,633 (109) 5,668 
    Other expense—intercompany  26  425  21  77  95  (567) (77)  109 6 3 166 153 (271) (166)  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
                     
    Total operating expenses $163 $5,026 $21 $432 $556 $9,805 $(432)$15,571 $289 $2,715 $4 $395 $485 $8,594 $(395)$12,087 
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
                     
    Income before taxes, minority interest and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries $2,322 $1,204 $23 $298 $215 $5,962 $(3,103)$6,921
    Income (Loss) before taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries $(397)$2,288 $664 $(177)$83 $(224)$158 $2,395 
    Income taxes (benefits)  (241) 361  9  106  64  1,669  (106) 1,862 651 692 232 (59) 32 (822) 59 785 
    Minority interest, net of taxes            47    47
    Equities in undistributed income of subsidiaries  2,449            (2,449)  2,641      (2,641)  
    Income (Loss) from continuing operations $1,593 $1,596 $432 $(118)$51 $598 $(2,542)$1,610 
    Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes      (33)  (33)
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
                     
    Net income $5,012 $843 $14 $192 $151 $4,246 $(5,446)$5,012
    Net income (Loss) before attribution of Noncontrolling Interests $1,593 $1,596 $432 $(118)$51 $565 $(2,542)$1,577 
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
                     
    Net Income (Loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests  (1)    (15)  (16)
                     
    Citigroup's Net Income (Loss) $1,593 $1,597 $432 $(118)$51 $580 $(2,542)$1,593 
                     

    Table of Contents

    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME

     
     Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 
    In millions of dollars Citigroup
    parent
    company
     CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
    Citigroup
    subsidiaries,
    eliminations
     Consolidating
    adjustments
     Citigroup
    consolidated
     
    Revenues                         
    Dividends from subsidiary banks and bank holding companies $1,366 $ $ $ $ $ $(1,366)$ 
    Interest revenue  134  5,824    1,812  2,092  21,140  (1,812) 29,190 
    Interest revenue—intercompany  1,306  445  1,412  11  151  (3,314) (11)  
    Interest expense  2,291  4,063  961  41  175  8,632  (41) 16,122 
    Interest expense—intercompany  (27) 1,406  108  624  693  (2,180) (624)  
                      
    Net interest revenue $(824)$800 $343 $1,158 $1,375 $11,374 $(1,158)$13,068 
                      
    Commissions and fees $ $2,233 $ $20 $47 $(704)$(20)$1,576 
    Commissions and fees—intercompany  (10) 72    7  11  (73) (7)  
    Principal transactions  958  (7,568) 816    (4) (865)   (6,663)
    Principal transactions—intercompany  (284) 176  (582)   23  667     
    Other income  (1,756) 964  (66) 109  134  5,184  (109) 4,460 
    Other income—intercompany  1,306  540  70  7  26  (1,942) (7)  
                      
    Total non-interest revenues $214 $(3,583)$238 $143 $237 $2,267 $(143)$(627)
                      
    Total revenues, net of interest expense $756 $(2,783)$581 $1,301 $1,612 $13,641 $(2,667)$12,441 
                      
    Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims $ $16 $ $989 $1,086 $4,750 $(989)$5,852 
                      
    Expenses                         
    Compensation and benefits $(7)$2,804 $ $198 $274 $5,693 $(198)$8,764 
    Compensation and benefits—intercompany  2  236    49  50  (288) (49)  
    Other expense  49  959    125  167  5,836  (125) 7,011 
    Other expense—intercompany  33  335  15  81  104  (487) (81)  
                      
    Total operating expenses $77 $4,334 $15 $453 $595 $10,754 $(453)$15,775 
                      
    Income (Loss) before taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries $679 $(7,133)$566 $(141)$(69)$(1,863)$(1,225)$(9,186)
    Income taxes (benefits)  (437) (2,744) 200  (45) (16) (942) 45  (3,939)
    Equities in undistributed income of subsidiaries  (6,227)           6,227   
    Income (Loss) from continuing operations $(5,111)$(4,389)$366 $(96)$(53)$(921)$4,957 $(5,247)
    Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes            115    115 
                      
    Net income (Loss) before attribution of Noncontrolling Interests $(5,111)$(4,389)$366 $(96)$(53)$(806)$4,957 $(5,132)
                      
    Net Income (Loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests    (6)       (15)   (21)
                      
    Citigroup's Net Income (Loss) $(5,111)$(4,383)$366 $(96)$(53)$(791)$4,957 $(5,111)
                      

    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETTable of Contents

     
     March 31, 2008
     
    In millions of dollars

     Citigroup
    parent
    company

     CGMHI
     CFI
     CCC
     Associates
     Other
    Citigroup
    subsidiaries
    and
    eliminations

     Consolidating
    adjustments

     Citigroup
    consolidated

     
    Assets                         
    Cash and due from banks $1 $3,690 $ $207 $314 $26,832 $(207)$30,837 
    Cash and due from banks—intercompany  20  785  5  141  161  (971) (141)  
    Federal funds sold and resale agreements    213,454        25,552    239,006 
    Federal funds sold and resale agreements—intercompany    16,573        (16,573)    
    Trading account assets  28  261,752  846    24  315,787    578,437 
    Trading account assets—intercompany  260  10,954  1,661    13  (12,888)    
    Investments  14,380  506    2,302  2,837  186,432  (2,302) 204,155 
    Loans, net of unearned income    756    50,032  59,136  729,951  (50,032) 789,843 
    Loans, net of unearned income—intercompany      120,812  5,964  12,111  (132,923) (5,964)  
    Allowance for loan losses    (84)   (1,992) (2,201) (15,972) 1,992  (18,257)
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Total loans, net $ $672 $120,812 $54,004 $69,046 $581,056 $(54,004)$771,586 
    Advances to subsidiaries  126,313          (126,313)    
    Investments in subsidiaries  162,273            (162,273)  
    Other assets  8,955  94,792  62  5,687  7,278  264,740  (5,687) 375,827 
    Other assets—intercompany  8,191  36,816  4,646  265  983  (50,636) (265)  
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Total assets $320,421 $639,994 $128,032 $62,606 $80,656 $1,193,018 $(224,879)$2,199,848 
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Liabilities and stockholders' equity                         
    Deposits $ $ $ $ $ $831,208 $ $831,208 
    Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold    226,964        52,597    279,561 
    Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold—intercompany    12,750        (12,750)    
    Trading account liabilities    107,132  62      94,792    201,986 
    Trading account liabilities—intercompany  372  9,717  616      (10,705)    
    Short-term borrowings  1,234  18,598  44,055    1,249  70,663    135,799 
    Short-term borrowings—intercompany    50,076  41,712  8,505  39,572  (131,360) (8,505)  
    Long-term debt  181,108  25,095  37,880  2,718  12,547  168,329  (2,718) 424,959 
    Long-term debt—intercompany    43,786  856  42,343  18,802  (63,444) (42,343)  
    Advances from subsidiaries  2,552          (2,552)    
    Other liabilities  4,313  106,974  381  2,065  2,047  84,401  (2,065) 198,116 
    Other liabilities—intercompany  2,623  29,049  178  695  210  (32,060) (695)  
    Stockholders' equity  128,219  9,853  2,292  6,280  6,229  143,899  (168,553) 128,219 
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $320,421 $639,994 $128,032 $62,606 $80,656 $1,193,018 $(224,879)$2,199,848 
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET


     December 31, 2007
      March 31, 2009 
    In millions of dollars

     Citigroup parent company
     CGMHI
     CFI
     CCC
     Associates
     Other
    Citigroup
    subsidiaries
    and
    eliminations

     Consolidating
    adjustments

     Citigroup
    consolidated

      Citigroup
    parent
    company
     CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
    Citigroup
    subsidiaries
    and
    eliminations
     Consolidating
    adjustments
     Citigroup
    consolidated
     
    Assets                          
    Cash and due from banks $ $4,405 $2 $182 $280 $33,519 $(182)$38,206  $ $2,901 $ $136 $190 $27,972 $(136)$31,063 
    Cash and due from banks—intercompany  19  892    139  160  (1,071) (139)   14 1,262 1 139 153 (1,430) (139)  
    Federal funds sold and resale agreements    242,771        31,295    274,066   163,989    15,614  179,603 
    Federal funds sold and resale agreements—intercompany    12,668        (12,668)      23,912    (23,912)   
    Trading account assets  12  273,662  303    30  264,977    538,984  25 135,342 296  12 199,547  335,222 
    Trading account assets—intercompany  262  7,648  1,458    5  (9,373)     466 10,736 3,555  185 (14,942)   
    Investments  10,934  431    2,275  2,813  200,830  (2,275) 215,008  10,034 329  2,105 2,359 226,084 (2,105) 238,806 
    Loans, net of unearned income    758    49,705  58,944  718,291  (49,705) 777,993   519  46,651 52,943 603,830 (46,651) 657,292 
    Loans, net of unearned income—intercompany      106,645  3,987  12,625  (119,270) (3,987)     137,373 5,152 9,271 (146,644) (5,152)  
    Allowance for loan losses    (79)   (1,639) (1,828) (14,210) 1,639  (16,117)  (143)  (3,378) (3,629) (27,931) 3,378 (31,703)
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
                      
    Total loans, net $ $679 $106,645 $52,053 $69,741 $584,811 $(52,053)$761,876  $ $376 $137,373 $48,425 $58,585 $429,255 $(48,425)$625,589 
                     
    Advances to subsidiaries  111,155          (111,155)     134,731     (134,731)   
    Investments in subsidiaries  166,017            (166,017)   182,783      (182,783)  
    Other assets  7,804  88,333  76  5,552  7,227  256,051  (5,552) 359,491  16,416 69,188 53 6,216 7,032 319,606 (6,216) 412,295 
    Other assets—intercompany  6,073  32,051  4,846  273  480  (43,450) (273)   16,984 50,462 2,949 228 846 (71,241) (228)  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
                      
    Total assets $302,276 $663,540 $113,330 $60,474 $80,736 $1,193,766 $(226,491)$2,187,631  $361,453 $458,497 $144,227 $57,249 $69,362 $971,822 $(240,032)$1,822,578 
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
                      
    Liabilities and stockholders' equity                         
    Liabilities and equity 
    Deposits $ $ $ $ $ $826,230 $ $826,230  $ $ $ $ $ $762,696 $ $762,696 
    Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold    260,129        44,114    304,243   148,382    36,421  184,803 
    Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold—intercompany  1,486  10,000        (11,486)     185 9,603    (9,788)   
    Trading account liabilities    117,627  121      64,334    182,082   63,108    67,718  130,826 
    Trading account liabilities—intercompany  161  6,327  375    21  (6,884)     781 9,689 2,706   (13,176)   
    Short-term borrowings  5,635  16,732  41,429    1,444  81,248    146,488  2,364 7,080 30,912  7 76,026  116,389 
    Short-term borrowings—intercompany    59,461  31,691  5,742  37,181  (128,333) (5,742)    90,375 63,531 7,355 36,442 (190,348) (7,355)  
    Long-term debt  171,637  31,401  36,395  3,174  13,679  174,000  (3,174) 427,112  186,740 15,311 40,523 2,124 7,691 86,987 (2,124) 337,252 
    Long-term debt—intercompany    39,606  957  42,293  19,838  (60,401) (42,293)   2,083 41,720 1,375 39,762 17,654 (62,832) (39,762)  
    Advances from subsidiaries  3,555          (3,555)     10,508     (10,508)   
    Other liabilities  4,580  98,425  268  2,027  1,960  82,645  (2,027) 187,878  7,657 57,000 952 1,857 1,672 77,404 (1,857) 144,685 
    Other liabilities—intercompany  1,624  9,640  165  847  271  (11,700) (847)   7,201 6,491 98 852 518 (14,308) (852)  
    Stockholders' equity  113,598  14,192  1,929  6,391  6,342  143,554  (172,408) 113,598 
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
                      
    Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $302,276 $663,540 $113,330 $60,474 $80,736 $1,193,766 $(226,491)$2,187,631 
    Total liabilities $217,519 $448,759 $140,097 $51,950 $63,984 $806,292 $(51,950)$1,676,651 
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
                      
    Citigroup stockholder's equity 143,934 9,330 4,130 5,299 5,378 163,945 (188,082) 143,934 
    Noncontrolling interest  408    1,585  1,993 
                     
    Total equity $143,934 $9,738 $4,130 $5,299 $5,378 $165,530 $(188,082)$145,927 
                     
    Total liabilities and equity $361,453 $458,497 $144,227 $57,249 $69,362 $971,822 $(240,032)$1,822,578 
                     

    Table of Contents

    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET

     
     December 31, 2008 
    In millions of dollars Citigroup
    parent
    company
     CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
    Citigroup
    subsidiaries
    and
    eliminations
     Consolidating
    adjustments
     Citigroup
    consolidated
     
    Assets                         
    Cash and due from banks $ $3,142 $ $149 $211 $25,900 $(149)$29,253 
    Cash and due from banks—intercompany  13  1,415  1  141  185  (1,614) (141)  
    Federal funds sold and resale agreements    167,589        16,544    184,133 
    Federal funds sold and resale agreements—intercompany    31,446        (31,446)    
    Trading account assets  20  155,136  88    15  222,376    377,635 
    Trading account assets—intercompany  818  11,197  4,439    182  (16,636)    
    Investments  25,611  382    2,059  2,366  227,661  (2,059) 256,020 
    Loans, net of unearned income    663    48,663  55,387  638,166  (48,663) 694,216 
    Loans, net of unearned income—intercompany      134,744  3,433  11,129  (145,873) (3,433)  
    Allowance for loan losses    (122)   (3,415) (3,649) (25,845) 3,415  (29,616)
                      
    Total loans, net $ $541 $134,744 $48,681 $62,867 $466,448 $(48,681)$664,600 
    Advances to subsidiaries  167,043          (167,043)    
    Investments in subsidiaries  149,424            (149,424)  
    Other assets  12,148  74,740  51  6,156  6,970  332,920  (6,156) 426,829 
    Other assets—intercompany  14,998  108,952  3,997  254  504  (128,451) (254)  
                      
    Total assets $370,075 $554,540 $143,320 $57,440 $73,300 $946,659 $(206,864)$1,938,470 
                      
    Liabilities and equity                         
    Deposits $ $ $ $ $ $774,185 $ $774,185 
    Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold    165,914        39,379    205,293 
    Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold—intercompany  8,673  34,007        (42,680)    
    Trading account liabilities    70,006  14      97,458    167,478 
    Trading account liabilities—intercompany  732  12,751  2,660      (16,143)    
    Short-term borrowings  2,571  9,735  30,994    222  83,169    126,691 
    Short-term borrowings—intercompany    87,432  66,615  6,360  39,637  (193,684) (6,360)  
    Long-term debt  192,290  20,623  37,374  2,214  8,333  100,973  (2,214) 359,593 
    Long-term debt—intercompany    60,318  878  40,722  17,655  (78,851) (40,722)  
    Advances from subsidiaries  7,660          (7,660)    
    Other liabilities  7,347  75,247  855  1,907  1,808  75,951  (1,907) 161,208 
    Other liabilities—intercompany  9,172  10,213  232  833  332  (19,949) (833)  
                      
    Total liabilities $228,445 $546,246 $139,622 $52,036 $67,987 $812,148 $(52,036)$1,794,448 
                      
    Citigroup stockholders' equity  141,630  7,819  3,698  5,404  5,313  132,594  (154,828) 141,630 
    Noncontrolling interest    475        1,917    2,392 
                      
    Total equity $141,630 $8,294 $3,698 $5,404 $5,313 $134,511 $(154,828)$144,022 
                      
    Total liabilities and equity $370,075 $554,540 $$143,320 $57,440 $73,300 $946,659 $(206,864)$1,938,470 
                      

    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWSTable of Contents

     
     Three Months Ended March 31, 2008
     
    In millions of dollars

     Citigroup
    parent
    company

     CGMHI
     CFI
     CCC
     Associates
     Other
    Citigroup
    subsidiaries
    and
    eliminations

     Consolidating
    adjustments

     Citigroup
    Consolidated

     
    Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities $5,942 $28,583 $(26)$987 $593 $(33,506)$(987)$1,586 
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Cash flows from investing activities                         
    Change in loans $ $54 $(14,069)$(1,288)$(1,239)$(68,019)$1,288 $(83,273)
    Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans    19        67,506    67,525 
    Purchases of investments  (47,741) (75)   (207) (322) (44,359) 207  (92,497)
    Proceeds from sales of investments  8,565      65  162  30,844  (65) 39,571 
    Proceeds from maturities of investments  35,988      90  98  22,763  (90) 58,849 
    Changes in investments and advances—intercompany  (16,236)     (1,978) 514  15,722  1,978   
    Business acquisitions                 
    Other investing activities    (20,058)       16,527    (3,531)
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities $(19,424)$(20,060)$(14,069)$(3,318)$(787)$40,984 $3,318 $(13,356)
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Cash flows from financing activities                         
    Dividends paid $(1,759)$ $ $ $ $ $ $(1,759)
    Dividends paid-intercompany    (27)       27     
    Issuance of common stock  46              46 
    Issuance of preferred stock  19,384              19,384 
    Treasury stock acquired  (6)             (6)
    Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt—third-party, net  2,775  (5,989) 1,318  (456) (1,132) (4,574) 456  (7,602)
    Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt-intercompany, net    4,190    50  (1,036) (3,154) (50)  
    Change in deposits            4,978    4,978 
    Net change in short-term borrowings and other investment banking and brokerage borrowings—third-party  (4,213) 1,866  2,726    6  (11,074)   (10,689)
    Net change in short-term borrowings and other advances—intercompany  (2,457) (9,385) 10,053  2,764  2,391  (602) (2,764)  
    Capital contributions from parent                 
    Other financing activities  (286)   1      (1)   (286)
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities $13,484 $(9,345)$14,098 $2,358 $229 $(14,400)$(2,358)$4,066 
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and due from banks $ $ $ $ $ $335 $ $335 
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks $2 $(822)$3 $27 $35 $(6,587)$(27)$(7,369)
    Cash and due from banks at beginning of period  19  5,297  2  321  440  32,448  (321) 38,206 
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Cash and due from banks at end of period $21 $4,475 $5 $348 $475 $25,861 $(348)$30,837 
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information                         
    Cash paid during the year for:                         
    Income taxes $1,033 $(1,976)$91 $36 $16 $695 $(36)$(141)
    Interest  2,458  6,143  1,119  682  93  7,307  (682) 17,120 
    Non-cash investing activities:                         
    Transfers to repossessed assets $ $ $ $380 $394 $372 $(380)$766 
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS


     Three Months Ended March 31, 2007
      Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 
    In millions of dollars

     Citigroup
    parent
    company

     CGMHI
     CFI
     CCC
     Associates
     Other
    Citigroup
    subsidiaries
    and
    eliminations

     Consolidating
    adjustments

     Citigroup
    Consolidated

      Citigroup parent company CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
    Citigroup
    subsidiaries
    and
    eliminations
     Consolidating
    adjustments
     Citigroup
    Consolidated
     
    Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities $849 $(17,858)$73 $710 $1,255 $(2,736)$(710)$(18,417) $(17,530)$15,551 $1,623 $981 $826 $(8,796)$(981)$(8,326)
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
                      
    Cash flows from investing activities                          
    Change in loans $ $(13)$ $(769)$(883)$(71,517)$769 $(72,413) $ $ $(2,468)$817 $1,053 $(30,584)$(817)$(31,999)
    Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans            61,333    61,333   97    60,232  60,329 
    Purchases of investments  (4,147)     (173) (401) (76,681) 173  (81,229) (9,590) (13)  (195) (211) (48,322) 195 (58,136)
    Proceeds from sales of investments  1,688      50  121  37,208  (50) 39,017  6,892   34 42 20,840 (34) 27,774 
    Proceeds from maturities of investments  2,966      71  218  31,209  (71) 34,393  17,159   122 165 15,604 (122) 32,928 
    Changes in investments and advances—intercompany  (4,113)   (10,537) 121  606  14,044  (121)   7,526   (1,719) 1,858 (9,384) 1,719  
    Business acquisitions            (2,353)   (2,353)         
    Other investing activities    1,757        (4,409)   (2,652)  3,312    8,266  11,578 
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
                      
    Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities $(3,606)$1,744 $(10,537)$(700)$(339)$(11,166)$700 $(23,904) $21,987 $3,396 $(2,468)$(941)$2,907 $16,652 $941 $42,474 
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
                      
    Cash flows from financing activities                          
    Dividends paid $(2,698)$ $ $ $ $ $ $(2,698) $(1,074)$ $ $ $ $ $ $(1,074)
    Dividends paid-intercompany    (1,036)       1,036      (56)     56   
    Issuance of common stock  394              394          
    Issuance of preferred stock         
    Treasury stock acquired  (645)             (645) (1)       (1)
    Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt—third-party, net  8,943  (1,967) 6,080  (128) 195  (3,884) 128  9,367  1,791 (1,428) 4,047 (90) (642) (12,425) 90 (8,657)
    Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt-intercompany, net  (369) 2,124    208  (2,051) 296  (208)    (18,200)  (960) (1) 18,201 960  
    Change in deposits            24,902    24,902       (11,489)  (11,489)
    Net change in short-term borrowings and other investment banking and brokerage borrowings—third-party  (4) 4,895  (2,019) (934) (1,941) 8,787  934  9,718   (2,656) (126)  51 (7,571)  (10,302)
    Net change in short-term borrowings and other advances—intercompany  (2,037) 12,417  6,320  787  2,821  (19,521) (787)   (5,028) 2,943 (3,076) 994 (3,195) 8,356 (994)  
    Capital contributions from parent      100      (100)             
    Other financing activities  (819)             (819) (88)       (88)
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
                      
    Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities $2,765 $16,433 $10,481 $(67)$(976)$11,516 $67 $40,219  $(4,456)$(19,341)$845 $(56)$(3,787)$(4,872)$56 $(31,611)
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
                      
    Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and due from banks $ $ $ $ $ $9 $ $9  $ $ $ $ $ $(756)$ $(756)
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
                      
    Net cash used in discontinued operations $ $ $ $ $ $29 $ $29 
                     
    Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks $8 $319 $17 $(57)$(60)$(2,377)$57 $(2,093) $1 $(394)$ $(16)$(54)$2,257 $16 $1,810 
    Cash and due from banks at beginning of period  21  4,421    388  503  21,569  (388) 26,514  13 4,557 1 290 396 24,286 (290) 29,253 
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
                      
    Cash and due from banks at end of period $29 $4,740 $17 $331 $443 $19,192 $(331)$24,421  $14 $4,163 $1 $274 $342 $26,543 $(274)$31,063 
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
                      
    Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information                          
    Cash paid during the year for:                          
    Income taxes $(61)$644 $(20)$34 $25 $1,238 $(34)$1,826  $(27)$ $148 $53 $94 $896 $(53)$1,111 
    Interest  1,718  6,921  1,078  738  116  5,499  (738) 15,332  2,237 3,314 813 763 185 1,813 (763) 8,362 
    Non-cash investing activities:                          
    Transfers to repossessed assets $ $ $ $308 $315 $138 $(308)$453  $ $ $ $367 $380 $263 $(367)$643 
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
                      

    Table of Contents

    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

     
     Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 
    In millions of dollars Citigroup parent company CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
    Citigroup
    subsidiaries
    and
    eliminations
     Consolidating
    adjustments
     Citigroup
    Consolidated
     
    Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities $5,962 $28,583 $(26)$987 $593 $(33,361)$(987)$1,751 
                      
    Cash flows from investing activities                         
    Change in loans $ $54 $(14,069)$(1,288)$(1,239)$(68,019)$1,288 $(83,273)
    Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans    19        67,506    67,525 
    Purchases of investments  (47,741) (75)   (207) (322) (44,359) 207  (92,497)
    Proceeds from sales of investments  8,565      65  162  30,844  (65) 39,571 
    Proceeds from maturities of investments  35,988      90  98  22,763  (90) 58,849 
    Changes in investments and advances—intercompany  (16,236)     (1,978) 514  15,722  1,978   
    Business acquisitions                 
    Other investing activities    (20,058)       16,527    (3,531)
                      
    Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities $(19,424)$(20,060)$(14,069)$(3,318)$(787)$40,984 $3,318 $(13,356)
                      
    Cash flows from financing activities                         
    Dividends paid $(1,759)$ $ $ $ $ $ $(1,759)
    Dividends paid-intercompany    (27)       27     
    Issuance of common stock  46              46 
    Issuance of preferred stock  19,384              19,384 
    Treasury stock acquired  (6)             (6)
    Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt—third-party, net  2,755  (5,989) 1,318  (456) (1,132) (4,554) 456  (7,602)
    Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt-intercompany, net    4,190    50  (1,036) (3,154) (50)  
    Change in deposits            4,978    4,978 
    Net change in short-term borrowings and other investment banking and brokerage borrowings—third-party  (4,213) 1,866  2,726    6  (11,074)   (10,689)
    Net change in short-term borrowings and other advances—intercompany  (2,457) (9,385) 10,053  2,764  2,391  (602) (2,764)  
    Capital contributions from parent                 
    Other financing activities  (286)   1      (1)   (286)
                      
    Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities $13,464 $(9,345)$14,098 $2,358 $229 $(14,380)$(2,358)$4,066 
                      
    Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and due from banks $ $ $ $ $ $335 $ $335 
                      
    Net cash used in discontinued operations $ $ $ $ $ $(165)$ $(165)
                      
    Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks $2 $(822)$3 $27 $35 $(6,587)$(27)$(7,369)
    Cash and due from banks at beginning of period  19  5,297  2  321  440  32,448  (321) 38,206 
                      
    Cash and due from banks at end of period $21 $4,475 $5 $348 $475 $25,861 $(348)$30,837 
                      
    Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information                         
    Cash paid during the year for:                         
    Income taxes $1,033 $(1,976)$91 $36 $16 $695 $(36)$(141)
    Interest  2,458  6,143  1,119  682  93  7,307  (682) 17,120 
    Non-cash investing activities:                         
    Transfers to repossessed assets $ $ $ $380 $394 $372 $(380)$766 
                      

    Table of Contents


    PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

    Item 1.    Legal Proceedings

            The following information supplements and amends our discussion set forth under Part I, Item 3 "Legal Proceedings" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.2008.

    Enron Corp.

            In April 2009, the parties in DK ACQUISITION PARTNERS, L.P., ET AL. v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE & CO., ET AL., AVENUE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT II, L.P., ET AL. v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE & CO., ET AL., and UNICREDITO ITALIANO SpA, ET AL. v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, ET AL., reached agreements in principle to settle these actions. The three actions, which were commenced separately but were consolidated and pending trial, were brought against Citigroup and its affiliates, and JPMorgan Chase and its affiliates, in their capacity as co-agents on certain Enron revolving credit facilities.

    Research

            Metromedia Fiber Network.    On February 27, 2009, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York approved the class action settlement, and entered a final judgment dismissing the action with prejudice.

    Subprime-Mortgage-Related Litigation and Other Matters

            Securities Actions.    On February 20, 2009, plaintiffs in IN RE CITIGROUP INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, filed an amended consolidated class action complaint. On March 13, 2009, defendants filed motions to dismiss the complaints in IN RE CITIGROUP INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION and IN RE CITIGROUP INC. BOND LITIGATION.

            On March 13 and 16, 2009, two cases were filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging violations of the Securities Act of 1933—BUCKINGHAM v. CITIGROUP INC., ET AL. and CHEN v. CITIGROUP INC., ET AL. and were later designated as related to IN RE CITIGROUP INC. BOND LITIGATION. On April 9, 2009, another case asserting violations of the Securities Act of 1933—PELLEGRINI v. CITIGROUP INC., ET AL.—was filed in the United Stated District Court for the Southern District of New York and the parties have jointly requested that the PELLEGRINI action be designated as related to IN RE CITIGROUP INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION and IN RE CITIGROUP INC. BOND LITIGATION.

            On March 20, 2009, an action was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and related claims in connection with the marketing of certain CDO securities—EPIRUS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. v. CITIGROUP INC., ET AL. On April 24, 2009, defendants requested that the case be designated as related to IN RE CITIGROUP INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION.

            On March 23, 2009, a case was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California alleging violations of both the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934—BRECHER v. CITIGROUP INC., ET AL. On April 16, 2009, Citigroup filed a motion before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation for transfer of the BRECHER action to the Southern District of New York for coordinated pre-trial proceedings with IN RE CITIGROUP INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION and IN RE CITIGROUP INC. BOND LITIGATION.

            Derivative Actions.    On February 24, 2009, the Delaware Court of Chancery granted in substantial part defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint in IN RE CITIGROUP INC. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION. The court dismissed all but one claim for failure to make a pre-suit demand on the Citigroup Board of Directors or to plead demand futility. The sole surviving claim is for alleged waste in connection with the November 4, 2007 letter agreement with Charles Prince, Citigroup's former Chief Executive Officer. Discovery is ongoing.

            Other Matters. Underwriting Actions.    On March 20, 2009, four separately filed actions were consolidated by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York under the caption IN RE AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION.

            Discrimination in Lending Actions.    Two putative class actions have been filed alleging claims of racial discrimination in mortgage lending under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act, and/or the Civil Rights Act. The first action, PUELLO, ET AL. v. CITIFINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., ET AL., was filed against Citigroup and its affiliates in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The second action, NAACP v. AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE CO., ET AL., was filed against one of Citigroup's affiliates in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. In each action, defendants' motions to dismiss have been denied.

            Public Nuisance and Related Actions.    On February 12, 2009, BREWTONv. DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST CO., ET AL. was dismissed with prejudice due to plaintiff's lack of standing.

            On January 7, 2009, the court held a hearing on the motion to sever filed by CitiFinancial, Inc. and CitiMortgage, Inc. in CITY OF CLEVELAND v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., ET AL.

            Governmental and Regulatory Matters.    Citigroup and certain of its affiliates are subject to formal and informal investigations, as well as subpoenas and/or requests for information, from various governmental and self-regulatory agencies relating to subprime mortgage—related activities. Citigroup and its affiliates are cooperating fully and are engaged in discussions on these matters.

    Auction Rate Securities-Related Litigation and Other Matters

            Securities Actions.    Beginning in March 2008, Citigroup, its affiliates and certain current and former officers, directors, and employees, have been named as defendants in several individual and putative class action lawsuits related to Auction Rate Securities (ARS). The putative securities class actions have been consolidated in the United States District Court for


    Table of Contents

    the Southern District of New York as IN RE CITIGROUP INC. AUCTION RATE SECURITIES LITIGATION. Several individual ARS actions also have been filed in state and federal courts, asserting, among other things, violations of federal and state securities laws. Citigroup has moved the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to transfer all of the individual ARS actions pending in federal court to the Southern District of New York for consolidation or coordination with IN RE CITIGROUP INC. AUCTION RATE SECURITIES LITIGATION.

            Antitrust Actions.    On January 15, 2009, defendants filed motions to dismiss the complaints in MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE, MARYLAND v. CITIGROUP INC., ET AL. and RUSSELL MAYFIELD, ET AL. v. CITIGROUP INC., ET AL.

    Falcon and ASTA/MAT-Related Litigation and Other Matters

            In re MAT Five Securities Litigation.    On December 4, 2008, Citigroup announced an agreementdefendants filed a motion in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York to settle actions fileddismiss the complaint in this consolidated action brought by Enroninvestors in its Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings seekingMAT Five LLC. On February 2, 2009, lead plaintiffs informed the court they intended to recover payments to Citigroup as alleged preferences or fraudulent conveyances, to disallow or equitably subordinate claims of Citigroup and Citigroup transferees on the basis of alleged fraud, and to recover damages from Citigroup for allegedly aiding and abetting breaches of fiduciary duty. Under the termsdismiss voluntarily this action in light of the settlement (whichin MARIE RAYMOND REVOCABLE TRUST, ET AL. v. MAT FIVE LLC, ET AL. in the Delaware Chancery Court, which is currently being appealed. On April 16, 2009, lead plaintiffs requested that the action be stayed pending the outcome of the appeal in the Delaware case.

            Puglisi v. Citigroup Alternative Investments LLC, et al.    On January 9, 2009, plaintiff filed a motion to remand this action, previously consolidated with IN RE MAT FIVE SECURITIES LITIGATION, to New York Supreme Court, after defendants had removed it to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

            Goodwill v. MAT Five LLC, et al.    A settlement of this action was approved by the BankruptcyUnited States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and this action was dismissed on March 12, 2009.

            Marie Raymond Revocable Trust, et al. v. MAT Five LLC, et al.    An appeal from the Delaware Chancery Court's judgment approving the settlement was filed by objectors on January 14, 2009.

            ECA Acquisitions, Inc. et al. v. MAT Three LLC, et al.    Defendants removed this putative class action, filed by investors in MAT One LLC, MAT Two LLC, and MAT Three LLC, to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on April 24, 2008), Citigroup will make a pretax payment of $1.66 billion to Enron, and will waive certain claims against Enron's estate. Enron also will allow specified Citigroup-related claims in the bankruptcy proceeding, including all of the bankruptcy claims of parties holding approximately $2.4 billion of Enron credit-linked notes ("CLNs"), and will release all claims against Citigroup. Citigroup separately agreed to settle an action brought by certain trusts that issued the CLNs in question, by the related indenture trustee and by certain holders of those securities. The amounts of both settlements are fully covered by Citigroup's existing litigation reserves.

            On February 14, 2008, Citigroup agreed to settleConnecticut Resources Recovery Authority v.Lay, et al., an action brought by the Attorney General of Connecticut in connection with an Enron-related transaction; subsequently, the District Court dismissed the case on March 5, 2008. The amount paid to settle this action was covered by existing Citigroup litigation reserves.

    Parmalat

            InIn re Parmalat Securities Litigation, the Company filed aJanuary 21, 2009. Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgmentremand, filed on February 29, 2008. The motion27, 2009, is currently pending.

            InBondi        Hahn, et al. v.Citigroup Inc., pending in New Jersey Superior Court, the Company filed a motion for summary judgment with respect to each of plaintiff's claims and with respect to Citibank's counterclaims. Plaintiff also filed a motion for summary judgment with respect to Citibank's counterclaims. On April 15, 2008 the Court granted the Company's motion for summary judgment on all claims, except the claim relating to allegations of aiding and abetting Parmalat insiders in breaching their fiduciary duties to Parmalat, insofar as that claim pertains to the insiders' larceny from Parmalat. The Court also denied Bondi's motion for summary judgment on Citibank's counterclaim. Trial is set for May 5, 2008 on the remaining claim and Citibank's counterclaims.

            In the criminal investigation into alleged bankruptcy offenses relating to the collapse of Parmalat pending in Parma, Italy, a preliminary hearing began on April 21, 2008 with respect to 10 current and former Company employees. The next hearing is scheduled for May 28, 2008, when it is expected that two additional former Company employees will be added to the proceedings.

    Subprime Mortgage-Related Litigation

            Derivative Actions.et al.    On February 5, 2008,3, 2009, investors in MAT Five LLC filed this action against Citigroup and related entities in New York Supreme Court. On April 9, 2009, defendants moved in the four derivative actions filed in Delaware Chancery Court were consolidated underfor an order enforcing the captionIn re Citigroup Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation. A consolidated amended derivative complaint wasMARIE RAYMOND REVOCABLE TRUST settlement and enjoining plaintiffs from pursuing this action in New York Supreme Court. On April 15, 2009, defendants filed on February 19, 2008.a motion in New York Supreme Court to dismiss this action.

            OtherGovernmental and Regulatory Matters.    Putative class actions brought by shareholders of American Home Mortgage Investment Corp., pending in the Eastern District of New York, were consolidated on March 21, 2008. On April 4, 2008, lead plaintiff in the multi-district litigation filed a new putative class action complaint alleging violations of the securities laws arising out of underwriting activity by the Company and other investment banks, on behalf of American Home Mortgage. A consolidated amended complaint is scheduled to be filed by May 20, 2008.

            Two of three putative class actions brought by shareholders of Countrywide Financial Corp. were consolidated under the captionIn re Countrywide Financial Corp. Securities Litigation. The third,Luther v.Countrywide Financial Corp., et al., was remanded to California state court on February 28, 2008.

            On February 22, 2008, Citibank, N.A. filed a complaint against the City of Cleveland, Ohio seeking declaratory and injunctive relief on the ground that the City of Cleveland's public nuisance claim, asserted in a separate action, is preempted by federal law and may not be asserted against national banks and their operating subsidiaries.

            On April 14, 2008, a putative class action was filed against the Company in the Southern District of Florida, alleging that the Company violated the federal securities laws and Florida state law in connection with its marketing of the Falcon Strategies Two B hedge fund.

    Interchange Fees

    Citigroup Inc. and certain of its subsidiariesaffiliates are defendants, together with Visa, MasterCard,also subject to investigations, subpoenas and/or requests for information from various governmental and various other banks,self-regulatory agencies relating to the marketing and management of the Falcon and ASTA/MAT funds. Citigroup and its affiliates are cooperating fully on these matters.

    Adelphia Communications Corporation

            On December 3, 2008, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that plaintiff in actions filed on behalf of a putative class of retail merchants that accept Visa and MasterCard payment cards. The first of these actions was filed in June 2005, and the lawsuits were subsequently consolidated for pretrial proceedings, together with related lawsuits brought by individual plaintiffs against Visa and MasterCard, inW.R. HUFF ASSET MANAGEMENT CO., LLC v. DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP, ET AL. lacked standing to sue. On January 6, 2009, the United States District Court for


    the EasternSouthern District of New York underdismissed the captionIn re Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Litigation.action. On April 24, 2006, putative class plaintiffs filed20, 2009, the United States Supreme Court denied plaintiff's petition for a First Consolidated and Amended Class Action Complaint ("Consolidated Complaint"). The Consolidated Complaint alleges, among other things, that Defendants have engaged in conspiracies to set the pricewrit of interchange and merchant discount fees on credit and off-line debit card transactions, in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act and a California statute. The complaint also alleges additional federal antitrust violations by Defendants of Section 1 and Section 2 of the Sherman Act, including alleged unlawful contracts in restraint of trade pertaining to various rules governing merchant conduct maintained by Visa or MasterCard, alleged unlawful tying and bundling arrangements, alleged unlawful exclusive dealing arrangements, and alleged unlawful maintenance of monopoly power by Visa. The District Court granted Defendants' motion to dismiss all claims for damages that pre-date January 1, 2004. On May 22, 2006, the putative class plaintiffs filed a supplemental complaint against MasterCard and certain other bank defendants, including Citigroup Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries, alleging that MasterCard's initial public offering in 2006 violated Section 7 of the Clayton Act and Section 1 of the Sherman Act. The supplemental complaint also alleged that the MasterCard initial public offering was a fraudulent conveyance under New York state law. The defendants to the supplemental complaint filed a motion to dismiss its claims; the magistrate has issued a report recommending denying the motion in part, and granting it in part with leave to amend, which is pending before the Court for decision. Discovery is ongoing, and plaintiffs are anticipated to file a motion seeking class certification on May 8, 2008.certiorari.

    Other Matters

            Three putative class actions        Pension Plan Litigation.    On March 20, 2009, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral argument on defendants' appeal and one individual action have been filed against the Company and related entities and individualsplaintiffs' cross-appeal.

            Japan Regulatory Matters.    Beginning in the Southern District of New York, asserting various claims under the federal securities laws and state common law arising out of plaintiffs' investments in auction rate securities. The Company, along with other industry participants, also haslate 2008, certain Citigroup affiliates received a subpoenarequests for information from a state governmental agencyJapanese regulators relating to auction rate securities.the accuracy of their large shareholding reporting in Japan. Citigroup and its affiliates are cooperating fully with such requests.

            Lehman Brothers—Structured Notes.    Certain Citigroup subsidiaries served as a distributor of notes issued and guaranteed by Lehman Brothers to retail customers outside the United States. Following the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers, numerous retail customers have filed, and threatened to file, claims for the loss in value of those investments. In addition, a Public Prosecutor in Belgium has begun a criminal investigation. The Company is cooperating fully with that inquiry.

            A purported class action complaint,Leber v.Citigroup Inc., et al., was filed againstthe Belgian Public Prosecutor as well as with various other regulatory authorities outside the United States who continue to show an interest in the Company's role in the distribution of Lehman notes. In March 2009, the Ministry of Development in Greece imposed a $1.3 million fine for alleged violations of the Greek Consumer Protection Act, which the Company andintends to appeal.

    Settlement Payments

            Any payments required by Citigroup or its administration and investment committees, alleging that defendants engagedaffiliates in prohibited transactions and breached their fiduciary duties of loyalty and prudenceconnection with the settlement agreements described above either have been made, or are covered by authorizing or causing the Citigroup 401(k) Plan to invest in Citigroup-affiliated mutual funds and to purchase services from Citigroup-affiliated entities. The complaint was brought on behalf of all participants in the Citigroup 401(k) Plan from 2001 through the present.existing litigation reserves.


    Table of Contents

    Item 1A.    Risk Factors

            There are no material changes from the risk factors set forth under Part I, Item 1A. "Risk Factors" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.2008.


    Table of Contents


    Item 2.    Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

    (c)    Share Repurchases

            Under its long-standing repurchase program, the Company buys back common shares in the market or otherwise from time to time. This program is used for many purposes, including to offset dilution from stock-based compensation programs.

            The following table summarizes the Company's share repurchases during the first three months of 2008:2009:

    In millions, except per share amounts

     Total
    shares
    repurchased

     Average
    price paid
    per share

     Dollar
    value of
    remaining
    authorized
    repurchase
    program

    January 2008        
     Open market repurchases(1) 0.2 $27.19 $6,743
     Employee transactions(2) 4.5  25.18  N/A
    February 2008        
     Open market repurchases  $ $6,743
     Employee transactions 0.3  28.14  N/A
    March 2008        
     Open market repurchases  $ $6,743
     Employee transactions 0.2  22.77  N/A
      
     
     
    First quarter 2008        
     Open market repurchases 0.2 $27.19 $6,743
     Employee transactions 5.0  25.26  N/A
      
     
     
    Total first quarter 2008 5.2 $25.31 $6,743
      
     
     
    In millions, except per share amounts Total shares
    purchased(1)
     Average
    price paid
    per share
     Approximate
    dollar value
    of shares that
    may yet be
    purchased under
    the plans or programs
     
    January 2009          
     Open market repurchases(1)   $ $6,741 
     Employee transactions(2)  9.6  3.52  N/A 
    February 2009          
     Open market repurchases(1)  0.1 $3.23 $6,741 
     Employee transactions(2)  0.4  5.66  N/A 
    March 2009          
     Open market repurchases(1)  0.1 $2.52 $6,741 
     Employee transactions(2)  0.7  2.81  N/A 
            
    First quarter 2009          
     Open market repurchases(1)  0.2 $3.03 $6,741 
     Employee transactions(2)  10.7  3.56  N/A 
            
    Total first quarter 2009  10.9 $3.55 $6,741 
            

    (1)
    All open market repurchases were transacted under an existing authorized share repurchase plan. On April 17, 2006, the Board of Directors authorized up to an additional $10 billion in share repurchases. Shares repurchased in the first quarter of 20082009 relate to customer fails/errors.

    (2)
    Consists of shares added to treasury stock related to activity on employee stock option program exercises, where the employee delivers existing shares to cover the option exercise, or under the Company's employee restricted or deferred stock program, where shares are withheld to satisfy tax requirements.

    N/A

    Not applicable.

            In accordance with the various U.S. government programs or agreements to which the Company is party, the Company has agreed not to pay a quarterly common stock dividend exceeding $0.01 per share per quarter for three years (beginning in 2009), or to repurchase its common stock (subject to certain limited exceptions), without the consent of the U.S. Treasury. Citi intends to continue to pay full dividends on its outstanding preferred stock through and until the closing of the public exchange offers, at which point the dividends will be suspended. Citi does not intend to pay common stock dividends during this period and for so long as the preferred stock dividends are suspended.


    Table of Contents


    Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

            Citigroup's Annual Meeting of Stockholders was held on April 22, 2008.21, 2009. At the meeting:

    (1)
    14 persons were elected to serve as directors of Citigroup;

    (2)
    the selection of KPMG LLP to serve as the independent registered public accounting firm of Citigroup for 20082009 was ratified;

    (3)
    the Citigroup 2009 Stock Incentive Plan was approved;

    (4)
    Citigroup's 2008 Executive Compensation was approved;

    (5)
    a stockholder proposal requesting a report on prior governmental service of certain individuals was defeated;

    (4)(6)
    a stockholder proposal requesting a report on political contributions was withdrawn, therefore no votes were tabulated for this proposal;defeated;

    (5)(7)
    a stockholder proposal requesting that executive compensation be limited to 100 times the average compensation paid to worldwide employeesa report on predatory credit card practices was defeated;

    (6)(8)
    a stockholder proposal requesting that two candidates be nominated for each board position was defeated;

    (7)(9)
    a stockholder proposal requesting a report on the EquatorCarbon Principles was defeated;

    (8)
    a stockholder proposal requesting the adoption of certain employment principles for executive officers was defeated;

    (9)
    a stockholder proposal requesting that Citi amend its GHG emissions policies was defeated;

    (10)
    a stockholder proposal requesting a report on how investment policies address or could address human rightsthat executive officers retain 75% of the shares acquired through compensation plans for two years following termination of employment was defeated;

    (11)
    a stockholder proposal requesting an independent board chairmanadditional disclosure regarding Citigroup's compensation consultants was defeated; and

    (12)
    a stockholder proposal requesting an advisory votethat stockholders holding at least 10% of Citigroup's outstanding common stock have the right to ratify executive compensationcall special shareholder meetings was defeated; and

    (13)
    a stockholder proposal requesting cumulative voting was defeated.

            Set forth below, with respect to each such matter, are the number of votes cast for or against, and where applicable, the number of abstentions and the number of broker non-votes.


     FOR
     AGAINST
     ABSTAINED
     BROKER
    NON-VOTES

     FOR AGAINST ABSTAINED BROKER
    NON-VOTES
    (1) Election of Directors:         

    NOMINEE

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    C. Michael Armstrong

     

    3,820,417,775

     

    522,161,209

     

    N/A

     

    N/A

     

    2,652,446,041

     

    1,116,831,414

     

    N/A

     

    N/A
    Alain J.P. Belda 3,040,259,490 1,294,074,101 N/A N/A 3,022,486,697 904,215,624 N/A N/A
    Sir Winfried Bischoff 4,002,698,728 342,064,865 N/A N/A
    Kenneth T. Derr 3,102,086,781 1,237,934,146 N/A N/A
    John M. Deutch 3,950,243,007 390,586,751 N/A N/A 2,763,632,744 1,082,994,711 N/A N/A
    Roberto Hernández Ramirez 4,075,489,581 261,321,134 N/A N/A
    Jerry A. Grundhofer 3,644,626,322 281,823,648 N/A N/A
    Andrew N. Liveris 4,008,777,045 326,484,533 N/A N/A 3,324,738,608 518,759,237 N/A N/A
    Anne Mulcahy 3,330,413,156 1,012,940,300 N/A N/A 2,971,366,829 878,616,981 N/A N/A
    Michael E. O'Neill 3,635,947,437 293,286,786 N/A N/A
    Vikram S. Pandit 4,210,146,130 136,096,281 N/A N/A 3,589,130,584 342,950,642 N/A N/A
    Richard D. Parsons 2,991,539,847 1,320,422,738 N/A N/A 3,250,927,915 517,709,078 N/A N/A
    Lawrence R. Ricciardi 3,610,264,074 318,141,540 N/A N/A
    Judith Rodin 3,988,211,318 352,686,481 N/A N/A 3,321,205,768 526,914,875 N/A N/A
    Robert E. Rubin 4,011,661,455 335,411,884 N/A N/A
    Robert L. Ryan 4,111,694,383 228,019,040 N/A N/A 3,595,912,438 330,821,814 N/A N/A
    Franklin A. Thomas 4,064,472,435 277,220,558 N/A N/A

    (2) Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

     

    4,229,370,453

     

    120,318,220

     

    60,621,974

     

    N/A

    (3) Stockholder Proposal
    Requesting a report on prior governmental service of certain individuals.

     

    215,850,154

     

    2,607,759,569

     

    535,495,962

     

    1,051,171,152
    Anthony M. Santomero 3,626,107,977 302,147,372 N/A N/A
    William S. Thompson, Jr.  3,640,847,453 290,582,223 N/A N/A

    (2) Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

     

    3,773,157,923

     

    167,307,553

     

    37,393,365

     

    N/A

    (3) Proposal to approve the Citigroup 2009 Stock Incentive Plan.

     

    1,623,698,012

     

    617,074,829

     

    32,050,809

     

    1,732,444,835


    (4) Stockholder Proposal
    Requesting a report on political contributions was withdrawn.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    (5) Stockholder Proposal
    Requesting that executive compensation be limited to 100 times the average compensation paid to worldwide employees. 

     

    208,269,405

     

    2,939,541,561

     

    211,289,768

     

    1,051,176,104

    (6) Stockholder Proposal
    Requesting that two candidates be nominated for each board position. 

     

    169,779,291

     

    2,888,044,042

     

    301,276,978

     

    1,051,176,526

    (7) Stockholder Proposal
    Requesting a report on the Equator Principles. 

     

    132,998,595

     

    2,580,931,368

     

    645,170,121

     

    1,051,176,754

    (8) Stockholder Proposal
    Requesting the adoption of certain employment principles for executive officers. 

     

    1,093,707,179

     

    1,944,578,784

     

    320,815,371

     

    1,051,175,502

    (9) Stockholder Proposal
    Requesting that Citi amend its GHG emissions policies. 

     

    106,189,246

     

    2,622,127,350

     

    630,764,315

     

    1,051,195,926

    (10) Stockholder Proposal
    Requesting a report on how investment policies address or could address human rights. 

     

    261,472,163

     

    2,452,138,033

     

    645,476,153

     

    1,051,190,489

    (11) Stockholder Proposal
    Requesting an independent board chairman. 

     

    581,833,851

     

    2,591,982,929

     

    185,271,417

     

    1,051,188,641

    (12) Stockholder Proposal
    Requesting an advisory vote to ratify executive compensation. 

     

    1,277,659,624

     

    1,772,367,063

     

    309,062,004

     

    1,051,188,146

    Table of Contents

     
     FOR AGAINST ABSTAINED BROKER
    NON-VOTES

    (4) Proposal to approve Citi's 2008 Executive Compensation. 

     

     

    3,287,458,436

     

     

    618,660,115

     

    71,739,578

     

    N/A

    (5) Stockholder Proposal
    Requesting a report on prior governmental service of certain individuals. 

     

     

    220,803,277

     

     

    1,977,720,383

     

    74,294,752

     

    1,732,450,073

    (6) Stockholder Proposal
    Requesting a report on political contributions. 

     

     

    586,173,849

     

     

    1,370,127,454

     

    316,517,105

     

    1,732,450,077

    (7) Stockholder Proposal
    Requesting a report on predatory credit card practices. 

     

     

    600,201,556

     

     

    1,513,330,891

     

    159,290,010

     

    1,732,446,028

    (8) Stockholder Proposal
    Requesting that two candidates be nominated for each board position. 

     

     

    200,880,442

     

     

    1,948,417,876

     

    123,521,877

     

    1,732,448,290

    (9) Stockholder Proposal
    Requesting a report on the Carbon Principles. 

     

     

    141,241,356

     

     

    1,783,956,465

     

    347,591,916

     

    1,732,478,748

    (10) Stockholder Proposal
    Requesting that executive officers retain 75% of the shares acquired through compensation plans for two years following termination of employment. 

     

     

    704,417,260

     

     

    1,538,534,342

     

    29,866,903

     

    1,732,449,980

    (11) Stockholder Proposal
    Requesting additional disclosure regarding Citi's compensation consultants. 

     

     

    1,029,895,487

     

     

    1,215,878,347

     

    27,045,018

     

    1,732,449,633

    (12) Stockholder Proposal
    Requesting that stockholders holding at least 10% of Citigroup's outstanding common stock have the right to call special shareholder meetings. 

     

     

    1,051,475,100

     

     

    1,186,034,929

     

    35,313,706

     

    1,732,444,749

    (13) Stockholder Proposal
    Requesting cumulative voting. 

     

     

    858,253,671

     

     

    1,370,976,659

     

    43,572,860

     

    1,732,465,295

    Table of Contents

    Item 6. Exhibits

            See Exhibit Index.


    Table of Contents


    SIGNATURES

            Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 2nd8th day of May, 2008.2009.




    CITIGROUP INC.
        (Registrant)

     

     

    ByCITIGROUP INC.
        (Registrant)



    By


    /s/ GARY CRITTENDEN      EDWARD J. KELLY, III

    Gary CrittendenEdward J. Kelly, III
    Chief Financial Officer
    (Principal Financial Officer)

     

     

    By



    /s/ 
    JOHN C. GERSPACH

    John C. Gerspach
    Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
    (Principal Accounting Officer)

    Table of Contents


    EXHIBIT INDEX



    3.01.1 Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Citigroup Inc. (the Company), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.01 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed December 15, 1998 (No. 333-68949).


    3.01.2

     

    Certificate of Designation of 5.321% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series YY, of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.45 to Amendment No. 1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed January 22, 1999 (No. 333-68949).


    3.01.3

     

    Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company dated April 18, 2000, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01.3 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2000 (File No. 1-9924).


    3.01.4

     

    Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company dated April 17, 2001, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01.4 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2001 (File No. 1-9924).


    3.01.5

     

    Certificate of Designation of 6.767% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series YYY, of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01.5 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 (File No. 1-9924).


    3.01.6

     

    Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company dated April 18, 2006, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01.6 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006 (File No. 1-9924).


    3.01.7

     

    Certificate of Designation of 7% Non-Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, Series A,A1, of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 25, 2008February 18, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).


    3.01.8

     

    Certificate of Designation of 7% Non-Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, Series B,B1, of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.02 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 25, 2008February 18, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).


    3.01.9

     

    Certificate of Designation of 7% Non-Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, Series C,C1, of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.03 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 25, 2008February 18, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).


    3.01.10

     

    Certificate of Designation of 7% Non-Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, Series D,D1, of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.04 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 25, 2008February 18, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).


    3.01.11

     

    Certificate of Designation of 7% Non-Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, Series J,J1, of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.05 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 25, 2008February 18, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).


    3.01.12

     

    Certificate of Designation of 7% Non-Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, Series K,K1, of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.06 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 25, 2008February 18, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).


    3.01.13

     

    Certificate of Designation of 7% Non-Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, Series L1,L2, of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.07 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 25, 2008February 18, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).


    3.01.14

     

    Certificate of Designation of 7% Non-Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, Series N,N1, of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.08 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 25, 2008February 18, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).


    3.01.15

     

    Certificate of Designation of 6.5% Non-Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, Series T, of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.09 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 25, 2008 (File No. 1-9924).


    3.01.16

     

    Certificate of Designation of 8.125% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series AA, of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.10 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 25, 2008 (File No. 1-9924).


    3.01.17

     

    Certificate of Designation of 8.40% Fixed Rate/Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series E, of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 28, 2008 (File No. 1-9924).

    3.02

    3.01.18

     

    Certificate of Designation of 8.50% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series F, of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 13, 2008 (File No. 1-9924).


    3.01.19


    Certificate of Designations of Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series H, of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 30, 2008 (File No. 1-9924).


    3.01.20


    Certificate of Designations of Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series I, of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 31, 2008 (File No. 1-9924).





    Table of Contents

    3.01.21Certificate of Designations of Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series G, of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 16, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).


    3.02


    By-Laws of the Company, as amended, effective October 16, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 19, 2007 (File No. 1-9924).


    4.01


    Warrant, dated October 28, 2008, issued by the Company to the United States Department of the Treasury (the UST), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 30, 2008 (File No. 1-9924).


    4.02


    Warrant, dated December 31, 2008, issued by the Company to the UST, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 31, 2008 (File No. 1-9924).


    4.03


    Warrant, dated January 15, 2009, issued by the Company to the UST, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 16, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).


    10.01


    Amendment to the Travelers Group Capital Accumulation Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.05.3 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (File No. 1-9924) (the Company's 2008 10-K).


    10.02


    Amendment to the Citigroup Employee Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.08.2 to the Company's 2008 10-K.


    10.03


    Amendment to the Citicorp 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11.3 to the Company's 2008 10-K.


    10.04


    Citigroup Deferred Cash Award Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 21, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).


    10.05


    Citigroup 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (as amended and restated effective January 1, 2009), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Company's 2008 10-K.


    10.06


    Citigroup 2009 Stock Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 22, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).


    10.07


    2009 Deferred Cash Executive Retention Award Plan (amended and restated as of January 1, 2009), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the Company's 2008 10-K.


    10.08


    Master Agreement, dated as of January 15, 2009, among the Company, certain affiliates of the Company named therein, the UST, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the FDIC) and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 16, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).


    10.09


    Securities Purchase Agreement, dated January 15, 2009, among the Company, the UST and the FDIC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 16, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).


    10.10


    Joint Venture Contribution and Formation Agreement, dated as of January 13, 2009, by and between the Company and Morgan Stanley, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 16, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).


    10.11


    Form of Citigroup Performance Stock Award Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 21, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).


    10.12


    Form of Citigroup Executive Premium Price Option Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 21, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).


    10.13

    +

    Deferral Agreement entered into by Michael S. Klein,Letter of Understanding, dated December 29, 2006.April 22, 2008, between the Company and Ajaypal Banga.


    12.01

    +

    Calculation of Ratio of Income to Fixed Charges.


    12.02

    +

    Calculation of Ratio of Income to Fixed Charges (including preferred stock dividends).


    31.01

    +

    Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

     

     

     



    Table of Contents


    31.02
    +

    Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


    32.01

    +

    Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


    99.01

    +

    Residual Value Obligation Certificate.

    The total amount of securities authorized pursuant to any instrument defining rights of holders of long-term debt of the Company does not exceed 10% of the total assets of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries. The Company will furnish copies of any such instrument to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

    +
    Filed herewith



    QuickLinks

    TABLE OF CONTENTS
    Part I—Financial Information
    Citigroup Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS
    PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
    SIGNATURES
    EXHIBIT INDEX