UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

Commission File No. 33-7591

(An Electric Membership Corporation)
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.Yes ý    No o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):Large Accelerated Filer o    Accelerated Filer o    Non-Accelerated Filer ý(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    Smaller Reporting Company o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).Yes o    No ý

        Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.The registrant is a membership corporation and has no authorized or outstanding equity securities.

(This page has been left blank intentionally.)

OGLETHORPE POWER CORPORATION
INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31,JUNE 30, 2008

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements

Oglethorpe Power Corporation
Condensed Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
March 31,June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.

Oglethorpe Power Corporation
Condensed Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
March 31,June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.

Oglethorpe Power Corporation
Condensed Statements of Revenues and Expenses (Unaudited)
For the Three and Six Months Ended March 31,June 30, 2008 and 2007

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.

Oglethorpe Power Corporation
Condensed Statements of Patronage Capital and Membership Fees
and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Deficit (Unaudited)
For the ThreeSix Months Ended March 31,June 30, 2008 and 2007

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.

Oglethorpe Power Corporation
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
For the ThreeSix Months Ended March 31,June 30, 2008 and 2007

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.

Oglethorpe Power Corporation
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements
March 31,June 30, 2008 and 2007

(A)

General.    The condensed financial statements included in this report have been prepared by Oglethorpe Power Corporation (Oglethorpe), pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In the opinion of management, the information furnished in this report reflects all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) and estimates necessary to fairly state, in all material respects, the results for the periods ended March 31,June 30, 2008 and 2007. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to SEC rules and regulations, although Oglethorpe believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included in Oglethorpe's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the SEC. The results of operations for the three-month periodand six-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full year. As noted in Oglethorpe's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, substantially all of Oglethorpe's sales are to its 38 electric distribution cooperative members (the Members) and, thus, the receivables on the accompanying balance sheets are principally from its Members. (See "Notes to Financial Statements" in Oglethorpe's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.)

(B)

Adoption of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements." On January 1, 2008, Oglethorpe adopted SFAS No. 157. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 does not require any new fair value measurements. In November 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued a one-year deferral for the implementation of SFAS No. 157 for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a nonrecurring basis. The deferral is applicable for asset retirement obligations measured at fair value upon initial recognition under FASB Statement No. 143 "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations", or upon a remeasurement event. The effective date for the implementation of SFAS No. 157 for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities is January 1, 2009.

SFAS No. 157 is to be applied prospectively as of the first interim period for the fiscal year in which it is initially adopted, except for limited retrospective adoption for the following three items:

•

The valuation of financial instruments using blockage factors;



•

Financial instruments that were measured at fair value using the transaction price (as indicated in Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue 02-3); and



•

The valuation of hybrid financial instruments that were measured at fair value using the transaction price (as indicated in SFAS No. 155).

The impact of adoption in these areas would be applied as a cumulative-effect adjustment to opening retained earnings, measured as the difference between the carrying amounts and the fair values of relevant assets and liabilities at the date of adoption. Oglethorpe does not have any of the three aforementioned items, therefore no transition adjustment will be recorded.

SFAS No. 157 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

•

Level 1.    Quoted prices from active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. Quoted prices in active markets provide the most reliable evidence of fair value and shall be used to measure fair value whenever available. Level 1 primarily consists of financial instruments that are exchange-traded.



•

Level 2.    Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date. Level 2 includes financial instruments that are valued using models or other valuation methodologies. These models are primarily industry-standard models that consider various assumptions, including quoted forward prices for commodities, time value, volatility factors, and current market and contractual prices for the underlying instruments, as well as other relevant economic measures. Level 2 primarily consists of financial instruments that are non-exchange-traded but have significant observable inputs.



•

Level 3.    Pricing inputs include significant inputs that are generally less observable from objective sources. These inputs may be used with internally developed methodologies that result in management's best estimate of fair value. Level 3 financial instruments are those whose fair value is based on significant unobservable inputs.

As required by SFAS No. 157, assets and liabilities measured at fair value are based on one or more of the following three valuation techniques:

1.

Market approach.    The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities (including a business) and deriving fair value based on these inputs.



2.

Income approach.    The income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts (for example, cash flows or earnings) to a single present amount (discounted). The measurement is based on the value indicated by current market expectations about those future amounts.



3.

Cost approach.    The cost approach is based on the amount that currently would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset (often referred to as current replacement cost). This approach assumes that the fair value would not exceed what it would cost a market participant to acquire or construct a substitute asset or comparable utility, adjusted for obsolescence.

The tables below detail assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis (dollars in thousands).

---


Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis


---

				Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
				Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs
		June 30, 2008		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Decommissioning funds		$229,968		$219,288		$10,618		$62
Bond, reserve, and construction funds		4,591		4,591		—		—
Long-term investments		93,047		58,471		—		34,576
Restricted short term investments		61		—		61		—
Natural gas swaps		15,662		—		15,662		—
Deposit on Rocky Mountain transactions		104,689		—		—		104,689
Investments in associated companies		44,849		—		—		44,849

---


Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)


---

			Interest Rate Swaps
Liabilities:
Balance at January 1, 2008			$30,526
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized):
	Included in other comprehensive deficit		3,245
	Included in regulatory assets and liabilities		(33,771	)
Balance at June 30, 2008			$  —

(1)

Based on market conditions, Oglethorpe changed its valuation technique for auction rate securities to an income approach using a discounted cash flow model. Accordingly, these investments, which are included in long-term investments on the condensed balance sheet, changed from Level 1 to Level 3 within SFAS No. 157's three-tier fair value hierarchy during the period ending March 31,June 30, 2008.

Realized losses included in earnings for the period are reported in other (expense) income.




---


Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Nonrecurring Basis


---

(C)

New Accounting Pronouncement.    In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, "Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." The new standard is intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entity's financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. The new standard is effective January 1, 2009. Currently, the adoption of SFAS No. 161 is not expected to have any impact on Oglethorpe's results of operations or financial condition.

(D)

Accumulated Comprehensive Deficit.    The table below provides detail of the beginning and ending balance for each classification of accumulated other comprehensive deficit along with the amount of any reclassification adjustments included in margin for each of the periods presented in the Condensed Statements of Patronage Capital and Membership Fees and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Deficit. There were no material changes in the nature, timing or amounts of expected (gain) loss reclassified to net margin from the amounts disclosed in Oglethorpe's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. See Note G for further discussion regarding the termination of the interest rate swap arrangements.

Oglethorpe's effective tax rate is zero; therefore, all amounts below are presented net of tax.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Deficit

(E)

Environmental Matters.    Set forth below are environmental matters that could have an effect on Oglethorpe's financial condition or results of operations. At this time, the resolution of these matters is uncertain, and Oglethorpe has made no accruals for such contingencies and cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of loss with respect to these matters.

1.    General.    As is typical for electric utilities, Oglethorpe is subject to various federal, state and local air and water quality requirements which, among other things, regulate emissions of pollutants, such as particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and mercury into the air and discharges of other pollutants, including heat, into waters of the United States. Oglethorpe is also subject to federal, state and local waste disposal requirements that regulate the manner of transportation, storage and disposal of various types of waste.

In general, environmental requirements are becoming increasingly stringent. New requirements may substantially increase the cost of electric service by requiring changes in the design or operation of existing facilities or changes or delays in the location, design, construction or operation of new facilities. Failure to comply with these requirements could result in the imposition of civil and criminal penalties as well as the complete shutdown of individual generating units not in compliance. Certain of Oglethorpe's debt instruments require us to comply in all material respects with laws, rules, regulations and orders imposed by applicable governmental authorities, which include current or future environmental laws and regulations. Should we fail to be in compliance with these requirements, it would constitute a default under such debt instruments. Oglethorpe cannot provide assurance that it will always be in compliance with current and future regulations.regulations on Oglethorpe.

2.    Clean Air Act.    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced on March 27, 2008 that, in response to the Supreme Court's April 2007 decision in Massachusetts v. EPA, it intends to issue an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) later this spring to consider potential regulation of greenhouse gas emissions from stationary and mobile sources under the Clean Air Act. Oglethorpe cannot predict at this time whether regulation of greenhouse gas emissions from its power plants will ultimately result from this action and the effects of any such regulation.

In April 2007, the Sierra Club and the Coosa River Basin Initiative appealed two unsuccessful permit challenges involving operating permit renewals for Plants Scherer (co-owned by Oglethorpe), Bowen, Hammond and Branch to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. The permits were all challenged on the basis of not including compliance schedules to bring the sources into compliance with applicable opacity standards, not including an adequate statement of basis, and, for Scherer and Bowen, not including compliance schedules to bring the sources into compliance with Prevention of Significant Deterioration requirements. Oglethorpe filed a motion to intervene on behalf of EPA in the case and that motion was granted. Briefing on the case was completed in December 2007, and oral argument occurred on March 31, 2008. A decision is expected from the Court later in 2008.

(F)

Pollution Control Revenue Bonds (PCBs).    The three major credit rating agencies are in the process of an on-going review of the monoline bond insurers primarily as a result of the exposure some insurers have to financial guarantees provided onand credit default swaps related to structured finance obligations, primarily those backed by subprime residential mortgages. Several bond insurers have already been downgraded below their historical triple-A rating levels or have had negative outlooks assigned to their triple-A ratings, including threethe insurers that provide guarantees on a significant portion of Oglethorpe's outstanding variable rate PCB indebtedness.

BondThese bond insurer downgrades have been most material as it relates to their impactcaused a corresponding downgrade of the ratings on auction rate securities (ARS) guaranteed by the insurer,insured bonds, leading to increased focus on the underlying issuer credit, wider credit spreads, and in some cases failed auctions. A bond insurer downgrade can also affectauctions in the credit spread of insuredauction rate securities (ARS) market and failed remarketings in the variable rate demand bondsbond (VRDB); however, any effect is generally less

than on ARS due to market. However, the bank liquidity support on a VRDB which allows bonds to be put to the liquidity facilitythat is typically used in the eventVRDB market may somewhat mitigate the otherwise negative effect of a failed remarketing.bond insurer downgrades versus the ARS market which relies on the broker/dealers for liquidity support.

On March 31,April 1, 2008, Oglethorpe had outstanding $435 million of PCBs in the ARS mode and $410 million of PCBs in the VRDB mode. Oglethorpe has recently seen some of its ARS auctions fail due to investors moving away from the ARS market, and has also had VRDBs put to the supporting bank liquidity facilities due to the remarketing agents' inability to remarket the bonds as a result of a downgrade of the bond insurer. These events have resulted in higher variable rates of interest on the bonds, in some instances as high as 12.0%. At March 31, 2008, the weighted average interest rate on all of Oglethorpe's outstanding PCB debt was 6.3%.12.0 percent.

In light of these events, in two separate remarketings that closed in April 2008, Oglethorpe converted $312 million of its PCBs from the ARS mode to a Term Rate mode of interest (2-year

and 3-year terms) as it had the option to do pursuant to the underlying bond documents. At April 1, 2008, the weighted average interest rate on all of Oglethorpe's outstanding PCB debt was 6.3 percent, and at June 30, 2008 it was 4.9 percent. For more information on these interest rate mode conversions, see Oglethorpe's Form 8-K dated April 17, 2008 and Form 8-K dated April 24, 2008.

(G)

Interest Rate Swap Transactions.    As noted in Oglethorpe's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, Oglethorpe terminated both the AIG Financial Products Corp. (AIG-FP) interest rate swaps and the JPMorgan Chase Bank (JPMC) interest rate swaps in March 2008. Oglethorpe made a termination payment to AIG-FP of $36,611,000 and received a termination payment from JPMC of $2,840,000. The amounts have been recorded as a regulatory asset and regulatory liability in accordance with SFAS No. 71, "Accounting for Effects of Certain Types of Regulation" and will be amortized into expense over the remaining original life of the Series 1993A bonds and 1994A bonds, or 2016 and 2019, respectively.

(H)

Short-term Borrowings.    In the second quarter of 2008, Oglethorpe issued a total of approximately $260 million of commercial paper and used the proceeds to redeem the Series 1993A and Series 1994A PCBs, whose interest cost had increased due to a downgrade of the bond insurer. Oglethorpe expects to repay this commercial paper in late August 2008 using the proceeds from the issuance of the Series 2008 refunding bonds. See Financial Condition—"Liquidity" and "Financings" for a more detailed discussion.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Results of Operations

For the Three Months and Six Months Ended March 31,June 30, 2008 and 2007

Forward-Looking Statements and Associated Risks

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements, including statements regarding, among other items, (i) anticipated transactions by Oglethorpe, (ii) Oglethorpe's future capital requirements and sources of capital and (iii) achievement of a minimum 1.10 Margins for Interest Ratio (MFI Ratio). These forward-looking statements are based largely on Oglethorpe's current expectations and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, some of which are beyond Oglethorpe's control. For factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by these forward-looking statements, see Oglethorpe's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, in particular Item 1A—Risk1A-Risk Factors. In light of these risks and uncertainties, there can be no assurance that events anticipated by the forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report will in fact transpire.

Net Margin

Oglethorpe's net margin for the three-month periodand six-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2008 was $6.7$8.8 million and $15.5 million compared to $9.5$8.4 million and $17.8 million for the same periodperiods of 2007. The net margin variance for the three-monthsix-month period ended March 31,June 30, 2008 compared to the same period of 2007 was primarily due to budgeted interest on long-term debt and capital leases in 2008 being lowerhigher than the actual amount. In 2007 the actual amount of interest on long-term debt and capital leases was slightly lower than budgeted amount.anticipated.

Throughout the year, Oglethorpe monitors its financial results and, with Board approval, makes budget adjustments when and as necessary to ensure that a net margin equivalent to the minimum 1.10 MFI Ratio required under the Mortgage Indenture is achieved. Oglethorpe's management anticipates that the margin for the year ending December 31, 2008 will be approximately $19.5$19.9 million, which will yield an MFI Ratio of 1.10. For additional information on Oglethorpe's margin requirement, see "MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—Summary of Cooperative Operations—Rates and Regulation" in Oglethorpe's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.

Operating Revenues

Oglethorpe's operating revenues fluctuate from period to period based on factors including weather and other seasonal factors, load growth in the service territories of its Members, operating costs, availability of electric generation resources, Oglethorpe's decisions of whether to dispatch its owned or purchased resources or Member-owned resources over which it has dispatch rights, and by Members' decisions of whether to purchase a portion of their hourly energy requirements from Oglethorpe's resources or from other suppliers.

Total revenues from sales to Members were 8.7%5.5% and 7.0% higher in the three-month periodand six-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2008 than such revenues for the same periodperiods of 2007. Megawatt-hour (MWh) sales to Members increased 7.8%5.5% and 6.6% in the current quarter ofthree-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 versus the same quarterperiods of 2007. The average total revenue per MWh from sales to Members increased 0.9% forless than 0.5% during each of the three-month periodand six-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2008 compared to the same periodperiods of 2007.

The components of Member revenues for the three months and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2008 and 2007 were as follows (amounts in thousands except for cents per kilowatt hour):

Capacity revenues for the three-month period and six-month period ended March 31,June 30, 2008 remained relatively constant compared to the same periodperiods of 2007. Energy revenues were 21.3%12.4% and 16.3% higher for the three-month periodand six-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2008 compared to the same periodperiods of 2007. Oglethorpe's average energy revenue per MWh from sales to Members was 12.5%6.6% and 9.1% higher for the current periodperiods of 2008 as compared to the same periodperiods of 2007. The increase in energy revenues and average energy revenues per MWh for the three months and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2008 was primarily due to an increase in the pass through to Oglethorpe's Members of higher fuel costs (partly(primarily due to higher generation and partly due to the change in the generation mix)coal-fired generation) and higher purchased power energy costs (primarily due to the higher volume of purchased MWhs). For a discussion of fuel costs and purchased power costs, see "Operating Expenses" below.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses for the three-month periodand six-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2008 increased 9.3%3.2% and 6.0% compared to the same periodperiods of 2007. The increase in operating expenses for the current quarterperiods of 2008 compared to the same quarterperiods of 2007 was primarily due to higher fuel costs, production expenses and purchased power costs, offset somewhat by lower depreciation and amortization expense.and accretion expenses.

For the three-month periodand six-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2008 compared to the same periodperiods of 2007, total fuel costs increased 20.9%13.7% and 16.9% while total generation increased 7.1%5.1% and 6.1%. Average fuel costs per MWh increased 12.9%8.2% and 10.2% in the current periodperiods of 2008 compared to the same periodperiods of 2007. The increase in total and average fuel costs for the three-month periodand six-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2008 as compared to the same periodperiods of 2007 resulted primarily from increased generation ofa 14.8% and 9.8% increase, respectively, in higher cost coal-fired generation at Plant WansleyPlants Scherer and from higher cost natural gas-firedWansley. Coal-fired generation from the Chattahoochee energy facility. Gas-fired and coal-fired generation havehas a higher average cost per MWh of generation as compared to nuclear generation.

Production costs increased 9.5%5.9% and 7.7% for the three-month periodand six-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2008 compared to the same periodperiods of 2007. The increase wasincreases were primarily due to (1) major maintenance outage costs at the Doyle energy facility in 2008 (there were no major maintenance outage costs in the same periodperiods of 2007), (2) an increaseincreased staffing at nuclear Plants Hatch and Vogtle in response to new fitness for duty regulations impacting operations, maintenance and security personnel headcount at the nuclear generating facilities as well as hiring of replacement workers for a retiring workforce,departments, and (3) an increase in amortization of deferred nuclear refueling outage costs and increased amortization of deferred operationsrefueling and maintenance (O&M) outage costs forat several of the nuclear and coal-fired generation plantsunits due to the higher expense of longer, more complex outages These increases were offset somewhat by lower property tax expense in the current periods of 2008 compared to the same periods of 2007 due to a favorable ruling from the Georgia Supreme Court regarding Monroe County property tax assessments. (See "Notes to Financial Statements" in Oglethorpe's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.)

Total purchased power costs increased 17.9%7.0% and 11.7% for the three-month periodand six-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2008 compared to the same periodperiods of 2007. Purchased MWhs increased 29.2%19.6% and 23.7% for the three months and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2008 compared to the same periodperiods of 2007. The average cost per MWh of total purchased power decreased 8.8%10.6% and 9.7% for the three months and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2008 compared to the same periodperiods of 2007.

Purchased power costs were as follows (amounts in thousands except for cents per kilowatt hour):

Purchased power capacity costs remained relatively unchanged in the current quarterperiods of 2008 compared to the same quarterperiods of 2007. Purchased power energy costs for the three-month periodand six-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2008 increased 25.6%8.3% and 15.4% compared to the same periodperiods of 2007. The average cost of purchased power energy decreased 2.8%9.5% and 6.8% for the three-month periodand six-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2008 compared to the same periodperiods of 2007. The increase in MWhs acquired under Oglethorpe's energy replacement program, which replaces power from Oglethorpe owned generation facilities with lower price spot market purchased power energy, was primarily responsible for the increase in purchased power energy costs and for the increase in the volume of purchased power MWhs, along with the corresponding decrease in the average cost per MWh of purchased power energy. In addition, an increase in MWhs acquired under a purchased power agreement with Morgan Stanley also contributed to the increase in purchased power energy costs. These increases were offset somewhat by reduced purchases of MWhs under a purchased power agreement with Hartwell Energy Limited Partnership.

The line item "Other" under operating expenses includes accretion expense. Accretion expense represents the change in Oglethorpe's asset retirement obligations due to the passage of time. For nuclear decommissioning, Oglethorpe records a regulatory asset or liability for the timing difference in accretion recognized under SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations", compared to the expense recovered for ratemaking purposes. The accretion expense recognized by Oglethorpe is equal to the lesser of the earnings from both the decommissioning trust fund and the internal decommissioning fund or the asset retirement obligation for nuclear decommissioning expenses to be recognized under SFAS No. 143. The earnings on the decommissioning funds infor the first quarter ofthree months and six months ended June 30, 2008 were $2.0$6.5 million and $8.4 million lower than in the same periodperiods of 2007. As a result, accretion expense decreased $2.0$6.5 million and $8.4 million during the three months and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2008 as compared to the same periodperiods of 2007.

Depreciation and amortization expense decreased 17.9% (or $6.5 million)18.3% and 18.1% for the three-month periodand six-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2008 compared to the same periodperiods of 2007. Depreciation and amortization expenses infor the three-month and six-month periods of 2008 were lower primarily due to lower depreciation expenses for Plant Vogtle of $7.2 million.million and $14.3 million compared to the same periods of 2007. In June 2007, Georgia Power Company (GPC), as agent for the co-owners, filed an application with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to extend the licenses for Vogtle Unit No. 1 and Unit No. 2 for an additional 20 years. Effective July 1, 2007, Oglethorpe, under the provisions of SFAS No. 71, began deferring the difference between Plant Vogtle depreciation expense based on the current 40-year operating license versus depreciation expense based on the applied for 20-year license

extension. The deferral amount will be amortized to depreciation expense over the remaining life of Plant Vogtle beginning in the year the license extension is approved by the NRC. The approval from the NRC is expected mid-2009 or later.

Other Income

Investment income decreased 34.1%79.4% (or $4.0$9.3 million) and 56.8% (or $13.2 million) in the three-month periodand six-month periods ending March 31,June 30, 2008 compared to the same periodperiods of 2007. The decrease for the three months and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2008 compared to the same periodperiods of 2007 resulted partly from decreased interest earnings on cash and cash equivalent investments partly as a result of higherlower average investment balances and partly from higher

lower interest rates on those investments in 20072008 as compared to 2008. In addition,2007. As discussed above, lower earnings from the decommissioning trust fundfunds in 2008 compared to the same period of 2007 also contributed to the decrease as discussed above.decrease.

Interest Charges

Interest on long-term debt and capital leases increased by 6.5%1.5% and 4.0% in the three months ended March 31,current periods of 2008 compared to the same periodperiods of 2007. This increase resulted primarily from negative events in the capital markets which affected the cost of borrowing for Oglethorpe as it relates to PCBs in ARS mode and PCBs in VRDB mode as well as the borrowing costs incurred under the AIG-FP and JPMC interest rate swap transactions. For further discussion of the negative events in the capital markets and the early termination of the interest rate swaps, see NoteNotes F and G of Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements.

Balance Sheet Analysis as of March 31,June 30, 2008

Assets

Property additions for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2008 totaled $89.0$170.1 million. The expenditures were primarily for environmental control systems being installed at Oglethorpe's coal-fired generation plants, nuclear fuel, and normal additions and replacements to existing generation facilities.

The $22.1$36.6 million increase in nuclear fuel was due primarily to the timing of purchases and increased uranium costs.

Construction work in progress increased by $33.1$60.2 million in the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2008, primarily due to costs incurred for various replacement and improvement projects (including environmental control systems) at existing generation facilities.

The $16.1 million decrease in long-term investments was primarily due to a $7.8 million decrease in the fair market value of the investments and an $8.4 million decrease in auction rate securities held by Oglethorpe.

Cash and cash equivalents decreased $186.8$190.7 million principally due to payments for property additions, payments to GPC for operation and maintenance costs, the timing of certain principal and interest payments and interest rate swap termination payments.

Restricted cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2007 represented a portion of the proceeds obtained from the October 2007 refinancing of certain indebtedness associated with PCBs. These proceeds, which were on deposit with a trustee, were subsequently used in the first quarter of 2008 to pay principal related to the refinanced PCB debt that was called or matured in January 2008.

Restricted short-term investments represent funds deposited into a Rural Utilities Service (RUS) Cushion of Credit Account with the U.S. Treasury. Funds in the account earn interest at a guaranteed rate of 5% per annum, which is more than Oglethorpe is currently earning on its general fund investments. The funds, and any interest earned thereon, can only be applied to future debt service on RUS and RUS-guaranteed Federal Financing Bank notes.

During the first quarter ofsix months ended June 30, 2008, receivables increased $31.3$75.1 million, or 51.7%123.8%. The December 31, 2007 receivables balance included approximately $46.7 million of credit available to the Members for a Board approved reduction to 2007 revenue requirements. The increase in receivables was largely due to approximately $24.2$43.2 million of these credits being realized by the Members during the first quarter

2008. In addition, receivables for energy related costs were approximately $19.9 million higher in June 2008 as a result of 2008.increased generation. The increase was also partially due to an additional $16.5a $19.5 million receivable from GPC being recorded during the first quarter of 2008, which was primarily for the amount of estimated payments made to GPC for certain plant capital expenditures that exceeded the amounts incurred. Receivables from Smarr EMC for costs associated with operating its facilities increased by $6.6 million. Partially offsetting the increase in receivables was a $7.7$15.4 million increase in the contra receivable associated with the unrealized gain on natural gas hedges.

The $6.2$16.2 million increase in prepayments and other current assets was primarily the result of a $7.7$15.4 million increase in the asset associated with the unrealized gain on natural gas hedges.contracts. The

unrealized gain increased as a result of an increase in the mark to market prices. Partially offsetting thisThe increase was the amortization ofis also partially attributable to an increase in prepaid insurance balances.

Deferred outage costs increased $8.5$4.5 million (net of amortization), or 28.4%15.1%, as a result of the deferral of approximately $9.9$10.8 million of refueling outage costs incurred at Plant Hatch Unit No. 1 and $5.8$9.2 million at Plant Vogtle Unit No. 1 during the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2008. In addition, approximately $1.6 million was deferred for scheduled major maintenance costs at Plant Wansley Unit No. 2. Deferred outage costs are amortized over the plant's operating cycle.

As a result of the termination of the AIG-FP interest rate swaps during the quarter ended March 31, 2008, Oglethorpe recorded a $36.6 million regulatory asset. For further discussion regarding the interest rate swap terminations, see Note G of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements.

Deferred depreciation expense represents amounts being deferred in relation to the application made to the NRC to extend the licenses for Vogtle Unit No. 1 and Unit No. 2 for an additional 20 years. For further discussion regarding this deferral of depreciation expense, see "Operating Expenses" above.

The increase in the deferred asset associated with retirement obligations iswas primarily due to a $13.4$14.8 million decrease in the unrealized gain associated with the nuclear decommissioning fund and the corresponding increase in the deferred charge (a $5.6 million deferred credit existed at December 31, 2007). Consistent with Oglethorpe's ratemaking policy, unrealized gains or losses from the nuclear decommissioning fund are added to or deducted from the deferred asset retirement obligation assets or credits. The deferred asset or credit also increases or decreases to the extent of timing differences between accretion expense recognized under SFAS No. 143 and amounts recovered through ratemaking policy (via decommissioning fund earnings). Earnings on the decommissioning fund were approximately $1.3$6.9 million less than the related accretion expense, which resulted in the deferred charge also being increased by this amount. For further discussion regarding accretion expense, see "Operating Expenses" above.

Deferred depreciation expense represents amounts being deferred in relation to the application made to the NRC to extend the licenses for Vogtle Unit No. 1 and Unit No. 2 for an additional 20 years. For further discussion regarding this deferral of depreciation expense, see "Operating Expenses" above.

Other deferred charges decreased $4.9 million primarily due to a $3.0 million decrease in equipment prepayments to GPC. These prepayments are associated with refueling outages at Plant Hatch and Plant Vogtle. The decrease was also partially due to the termination of the JPMC interest rate swaps. For further discussion regarding the interest rate swap terminations, see Note G of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements.

Equity and Liabilities

Primarily as a result of the termination payment made to settle the AIG-FP interest rate swaps, accumulated other comprehensive deficit decreased by $30.3$28.3 million. For further discussion regarding the accumulated other comprehensive deficit and the interest rate swap terminations, see Notes D and G of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements.

Long-term debt and capital leases due within one year decreased 23.3%24.9%, or $33.4$35.7 million. The decrease was primarily a result of PCB debt payments made in January 2008. In addition to the normal PCB current maturities, the December 31, 2007 balance included approximately $30.1 million for PCB debt that was redeemed early. The March 31,June 30, 2008 balance for PCB debt included only the normal scheduled current maturities.maturities, which was affected by the early redemption of certain PCB debt in April.

Short-term borrowings represent commercial paper issued by Oglethorpe. The commercial paper was issued to redeem certain PCB debt during the second quarter of 2008. For further discussion regarding the issuance of commercial paper, see "Financial Condition—Financings" below.

Accounts payable decreased 39.8%increased 22.1%, or $16.6$9.2 million, primarily as a result of a $16.8$24.3 million increase in purchases of natural gas in June 2008 as compared to December 2007. This increase was primarily due to increased generation at the natural gas fired plants and partially to an increase in the price of natural gas. In addition, the payable to Smarr EMC for amounts billed by Oglethorpe on its behalf increased by $6.3 million. Spot market purchases of energy also increased approximately $1.7 million, partially offset by a $22.9 million decrease in the payable to GPC for operation, maintenance and capital costs. The payable to GPC includes true-up amounts for current and prior month expenditures. The true-up amounts vary to the extent that actual expenditures are different from GPC's estimates of these costs. At March 31,June 30, 2008, the estimated payments made for costs at certain plants exceeded the estimates and these true-up amounts were recorded as a receivable from GPC.GPC was recorded.

AsAccrued interest increased primarily as a result of the normal monthly accruals for interest expense.

Accrued and withheld taxes increased $6.8 million as a result of the normal monthly accruals for property taxes, net of payments made during the year.

Other current liabilities decreased by $11.7 million. The decrease was primarily due to the December 31, 2007 balance containing a $9.0 million liability recorded for negative cash. No such liability existed at June 30, 2008. The decrease was also due in part to accrued payroll charges, which decreased by $1.1 million as a result of the March 2008 payment for 2007 performance pay. Miscellaneous accounts payable also decreased by $1.3 million.

Primarily as a result of a $13.4$14.8 million decrease in the unrealized gain associated with the nuclear decommissioning fund, the deferred liability associated with asset retirement obligations converted to a deferred charge and was recorded as an asset.

The liability associated with the interest rate swap arrangements was settled by the payment made to terminate the AIG-FP interest rate swap.swaps. For further discussion regarding the interest rate swap terminations, see Note G of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements.

Financial Condition

Capital Requirements and Liquidity and Sources of Capital

Environmental Capital Requirements

Oglethorpe's future capital expenditures depend in part on future environmental regulations, including future implementation of existing laws, and regulations, judicial decisions and how Oglethorpe and the other co-owners of coal-fired Plants Scherer and Wansley choose to comply with these regulations once finalized. Regulations adopted by the Georgia Environmental Protection Division (EPD) specify certain environmental control equipment that must be added to Georgia electric generating units by specific dates, including Plants Scherer and Wansley. As described in "MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—Financial Condition—Capital Requirements" in Oglethorpe's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, Oglethorpe forecasts expenditures of $900 million in the period 2008 through 2014 to complete environmental compliance projects underway at Plants Scherer and Wansley. As regulations are finalized and design work continues to determine how best to retrofit the units with the required equipment, and as the construction environment, including the rising cost of material and labor, continues to evolve, the estimated cost to install these retrofits continues to be refined. Large construction projects such as these entail certain risks, as described in Item 1A—Risk Factors of Oglethorpe's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. These forecasted expenditures are based on information available to Oglethorpe on the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q; however, there can be no assurance that the cost of compliance with these regulations will not be higher, nor that future regulations will not require additional reductions in

emissions or earlier compliance. See Note E of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements for more information on environmental compliance matters.

On July 11, 2008, the U.S. Court of Appeals D.C. Circuit issued its decision in litigation challenging the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR). The D.C. Circuit vacated CAIR in its entirety, remanding it back to EPA for further rulemaking. This decision comes on the heels of the same Court's February 8, 2008 decision vacating the EPA's Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR). Together, CAIR and CAMR were the primary federal drivers behind the decisions by the co-owners of Plants Scherer and Wansley (including Oglethorpe) to add air pollution control equipment to those plants in the 2007 to 2014 time frame in order to reduce emissions of sulfur dioxide, oxides of nitrogen and mercury. While the control equipment being added at the plants continues to be required under a separate Georgia EPD regulation, Oglethorpe cannot predict whether this equipment will meet the requirements of any new federal rules that may be promulgated to replace CAIR and CAMR.

On July 30, 2008 an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was published in the Federal Register. Created in response to the Supreme Court's April 2007 decision in Massachusetts v. EPA, the ANPR solicits public comment on whether greenhouse gases from stationary and mobile sources should be regulated under the Clean Air Act and, if so, what issues might arise from such regulation. In addition, the possibility of Congressional legislation that would lead to regulation of emissions of greenhouse gases from mobile and stationary sources continues. Oglethorpe cannot predict at this time whether these actions will result in the regulation of greenhouse gas emissions from its power plants, nor the effects of any such regulation.

On June 30, 2008, a Fulton County, Georgia Superior Court Judge overturned an air quality permit to Longleaf Energy Associates LLC for the construction of a coal-fired power plant in Early County, Georgia. This permit had previously been upheld by the Office of State Administrative Hearings (OSAH) after an appeal by the Sierra Club and Friends of the Chattahoochee. The judgment set aside OSAH's decision on every issue raised on appeal, and concluded that carbon dioxide emissions are regulated, an issue with the potential to bring the permitting of new air emission sources of any significant size in Georgia (including new electric generating plants currently being considered by Oglethorpe) to a halt. Both the Georgia Environmental Protection Division and Longleaf Energy Associates are requesting that the ruling be reviewed by the Georgia Court of Appeals. Oglethorpe participated as Amicus Curiae in urging the Court to accept the appeal but cannot determine whether the appeal will be accepted and whether any ruling will ultimately impact the process of permitting new or modified sources in Georgia.

Liquidity

As of March 31, 2008, Oglethorpe had $654 million of unrestricted available liquidity toTo meet short-term cash needs and liquidity requirements. Thisrequirements, at June 30, 2008, Oglethorpe had liquidity consistedconsisting of (i) $104$100 million in cash and cash equivalents, and (ii) $550$290 million available under three committed working capital line of credit facilities.facilities described below.

Oglethorpe has in place a five-year $450 million committed working capital line of credit supporting its commercial paper program that matures in July 2012. Under its commercial paper program, Oglethorpe is authorized to issue commercial paper in amounts that do not exceed the amount of any committed backup lines of credit, thereby providing 100% dedicated backup support for any paper outstanding. In addition to providing support for commercial paper, funds may also be advanced under this line of credit for working capital purposes. However, any funds drawn for working capital will reduce the amount of commercial paper that Oglethorpe can issue. At June 30, 2008, Oglethorpe had $260 million of commercial paper outstanding (see further discussion below), leaving $190 million available to be drawn under the working capital facility or available to support additional commercial paper issuance.

The $450 million line of credit contains a financial covenant requiring Oglethorpe to maintain minimum levels of patronage capital. At June 30, 2008, the required level of patronage capital of at least $400was

approximately $414 million and at March 31, 2008, Oglethorpe hadOglethorpe's actual patronage capital in excess of $523was $532 million. The facility also contains an additional covenant limiting Oglethorpe's secured indebtedness to no more than $8.5 billion and its unsecured indebtedness to no more than $4.0 billion. Oglethorpe's current debt levels are well below these thresholds.

Oglethorpe also has in place two $50 million committed lines of credit, one with National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corporation (CFC) that matures in October 2008, and one with CoBank, ACB that matures in November 2008. Oglethorpe expects to renew the CFC and CoBank credit

facilities prior to their respective expiration dates. There are currently no amounts outstanding under either the CFC or CoBank credit facilities.

In April and May 2008, Oglethorpe issued a total of approximately $260 million of commercial paper and used the proceeds to redeem the Series 1993A and Series 1994A PCBs, whose interest cost had increased due to a downgrade of the bond insurer. Oglethorpe expects to repay this commercial paper in July 2008 using the proceeds from the issuance of the Series 2008 refunding bonds.bonds in late August 2008. See "Financings" below for a more detailed discussion of the Series 1993A and Series 1994A redemptions and the related refinancing of these bonds.PCBs.

Oglethorpe also has in place two $50 million committed lines of credit, one with National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corporation (CFC) that matures in October 2008, and one with CoBank, ACB that matures in November 2008. Oglethorpe expects to renew the CFC and CoBank credit facilities prior to their respective expiration dates. There are currently no amounts outstanding under either the CFC or CoBank credit facilities.

In addition to the unrestricted available liquidity discussed above, Oglethorpe also had approximately $51$35 million invested in ARS at March 31,June 30, 2008. These securities have maturities in excess of one year and as such are classified as long-term investments. However, most of these securities re-price in auctions that occur every 35 days or less, and Oglethorpe can seek to liquidate these securities at the end of any auction period. Recently, however, there have been failed auctions on the auction rate investmentsARS held by Oglethorpe, requiring Oglethorpe to hold the investments during the subsequent auction period. Oglethorpe is currently liquidating thesewas able to liquidate approximately $15 million of ARS in the second quarter and will liquidate its remaining ARS investments when possible. See "Footnote F herein and "MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—Financial Condition—Negative Events in the Capital Markets" in Oglethorpe's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 for a more detailed discussion of current events causing failed auctions.

Financings

Oglethorpe embarked on a program to refinance or otherwise reamortize a portion of its Federal Financing Bank and PCB debt to extend the maturities of this debt in connection with the extension, in 2005, of its Member wholesale power contracts from 2025 to 2050. This program will be completed later this year in connection with a Series 2008 PCB refinancing, totaling approximately $220$456 million, which Oglethorpe anticipates closing in October.November 2008. There are several aspects to this financing transaction, including: i)(i) the refinancing of $10 million of PCB principal maturing January 1, 2009 and an extension of the maturities on this debt, ii)(ii) the refinancing of the remaining $123 million of PCBs in the ARS mode and an extension of the maturities on this debt, (iii) the refinancing of $238 million of Series 2006 PCBs due to the downgrade of the bond insurer supporting the debt (GTC has an assumed obligation for approximately $40 million of this debt), and iii) issuing(iv) the issuance of approximately $85 million in new tax-exempt debt. The new tax-exempt debt is part of $150$200 million in newstate tax-exempt financing allocations received in 2005 and 2006 forto fund costs related to qualifying solid-waste equipment in connection with environmental compliance projects underway at Plants Scherer and Wansley. This PCB debt will be secured under the Mortgage Indenture.

In order to reduce the interest rate that Oglethorpe was paying on $255 million of outstanding PCBs due to a downgrade of the existing bond insurer of such PCBs, in April and May of 2008 Oglethorpe issued commercial paper and used the proceeds to redeem the Series 1993A and Series 1994A bonds. Oglethorpe expects to pay off the commercial paper through the issuance of $255 million of Series 2008 refunding bonds in Julylate August 2008. While this transaction is being undertaken mainly due to replace the downgradeddowngrade of the bond insurer, with a triple-A rated bond insurer, this transactionit will also provide for an immediate extension of the maturities,

rather than over time as the principal of the 1993A and 1994A bonds was scheduled to mature in January of each year through 2016 and 2019, respectively. TheThis PCB debt will be secured under the Mortgage Indenture.

In 2006, Oglethorpe received an allocation from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to issue up to $24 million of Clean Renewable Energy Bonds (CREBs) to fund an upgrade project currently underway at its Rocky Mountain generating facility. CREBs are zero coupon bonds, and in lieu of receiving an interest payment from the issuer the bondholder receives a credit against federal income tax liability. Oglethorpe had its CREB application submitted to the IRS on its behalf by CFC, along with the applications of other electric cooperatives. CFC, as a qualified issuer under the program, will issue the bonds and in turn loan the proceeds at a low rate of interest (approximately one percent) to the cooperatives whose applications were approved. Unless federal authority forThe CREBs is expanded,

program requires the bonds mustto be issued by December 31, 2008.2008, and Oglethorpe anticipates closing its CREBs related loan for up to $24 million with CFC later in October 2008. This loan will be secured under the Mortgage Indenture.

In late 2008 or early 2009, Oglethorpe plans to issue $500 million or more of taxable, fixed rate first mortgage bonds to fund capital expenditure needs and to increase liquidity reserves. The first mortgage bonds will be secured under the Mortgage Indenture.

Oglethorpe also anticipates filing four loan applications with the RUS totaling approximately $1.3 billion by September 2008, including a $121 million loan application for general improvements to existing facilities, a $186 million loan application for environmental control projects underway at Plants Scherer and Wansley, and two $500 million loan applications covering the construction of two 100 MW biomass facilities. For a further discussion of the biomass projects, see "Other Future Power Resources" in Oglethorpe's Form 8-K dated July 2, 2008. If approved, all of the RUS loans will be funded through the Federal Financing Bank (FFB) and guaranteed by the RUS, and the debt will be secured under the Mortgage Indenture.

In connection with Oglethorpe's anticipated participation in two new nuclear units at the existing Plant Vogtle site (see "Future Power Resources—Vogtle Units No. 3 and No. 4" in Oglethorpe's Form 8-K dated July 2, 2008), in July 2008 Oglethorpe submitted preliminary information to the Department of Energy (DOE) in connection with the DOE Loan Guarantee Program seeking funding for these proposed nuclear units. Oglethorpe is pursuing this additional funding source as a result of a moratorium currently in place at RUS regarding the funding of new baseload generating plants. The DOE loan guarantee program, which is intended to support commercialization of innovative technologies to reduce air pollutants including greenhouse gases, was initially authorized pursuant to the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and was subsequently funded and extended. The loan structure would entail a loan funded through the FFB carrying a federal loan guarantee provided by the DOE. Even if DOE funding is secured, it will not cover the full cost of the project and Oglethorpe will therefore seek other sources of funding, including the issuance of taxable bonds and tax-exempt bonds for any equipment that may qualify for such funding.

For more detailed information regarding Oglethorpe's financing plans, see "MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—Financial Condition—Financing Activities" in Oglethorpe's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.

Credit Rating Risk

Oglethorpe has financial and other contractual agreements in place containing provisions which, upon a credit rating downgrade below specified levels, may require the posting of collateral in the form of letters of credit or other acceptable collateral. Specifically, such agreements will require Oglethorpe to post collateral in the event of a credit rating change to BBB-/Baa3 or below. At June 30, 2008, the

maximum potential collateral requirement was $50 million at a senior secured rating level of BBB-/Baa3, and approximately $200 million at a senior secured rating level of BB+/Ba1 or below.

Provisions in the RUS Loan Contract, certain PCB loan agreements and the commercial paper backup line of credit agreement contain covenants based on credit ratings that, upon a credit rating downgrade below specified levels, could result in increased interest rates or restrictions on issuing debt. Also, borrowing rates and commitment fees in the CFC and commercial paper line of credit agreements are based on credit ratings and could therefore increase if Oglethorpe's ratings are lowered. None of these covenants, however, would result in acceleration of any debt due to credit rating downgrades.

Given its current level of ratings, Oglethorpe's management does not have any reason to expect a downgrade that would put its ratings below the rating triggers contained in any of its financial and contractual agreements. However, Oglethorpe's ratings reflect the views of the rating agencies and not of Oglethorpe, and therefore Oglethorpe cannot give any assurance that its ratings will be maintained at current levels for any period of time.

Newly Adopted or Issued Accounting Standards

For a discussion of SFAS No. 157 and SFAS No. 161, see Notes B and C of Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements, respectively.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Oglethorpe's market risks have not changed materially from the risks reported in Oglethorpe's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

As of March 31,June 30, 2008, Oglethorpe had carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including its President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Based on this evaluation, the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that Oglethorpe's disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

There have been no changes in Oglethorpe's internal control over financial reporting or other factors that occurred during the quarter ended March 31,June 30, 2008 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Oglethorpe's internal control over financial reporting.