Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

ý QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009

OR

o

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                             to                              

Commission file number 1-9924

Citigroup Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 52-1568099
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

399 Park Avenue, New York, New York
(Address of principal executive offices)

 

10043
(Zip Code)
(212) 559-1000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

(212) 559-1000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.:

Large accelerated filer ý Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
 Smaller reporting company o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý

        Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date:

Common stock outstanding as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009: 5,507,716,97422,863,947,261

Available on the Webweb at www.citigroup.com


CITIGROUP INC.

SECONDTHIRD QUARTER OF 2009—FORM 10-Q

THE COMPANY

 3
 

Citigroup Segments and Regions

 
4

SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

 
5

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Management Summary

 
7
 

Management Summary


7

Significant Events in the Third Quarter of 2009

 
89

SEGMENT, BUSINESS AND PRODUCT INCOME (LOSS) AND REVENUES

 
1512
 

Citigroup Income (Loss)

 
1512
 

Citigroup Revenues

 
1613

CITICORP

 
1714

Regional Consumer Banking

 
1815
 

North America Regional Consumer Banking

 
1916
 

EMEA Regional Consumer Banking

 
2118
 

Latin America Regional Consumer Banking

 
2219
 

Asia Regional Consumer Banking

 
2320

Institutional Clients Group (ICG)

 
2421
 

Securities and Banking

 
2522
 

Transaction Services

 
2724

CITI HOLDINGS

 
2825
 

Brokerage and Asset Management

 
2926
 

Local Consumer Lending

 
3027
 

Special Asset Pool

 
3229

CORPORATE/OTHER

 
3332

TARP AND OTHER REGULATORYGOVERNMENT PROGRAMS

 
3433

MANAGING GLOBAL RISK

 
3836

LOAN AND CREDIT DETAILS


36
 

Loans Outstanding


36

Details of Credit Loss Experience

 
3840
 

Non-PerformingNon-Accrual Assets

 
3941
 

Consumer Loan Details


43

Consumer Loan Modification Programs


44

U.S. Consumer Mortgage Lending


45

N.A. Cards


50

U.S. Installment and Other Revolving Loans


53

Corporate Loan Details


54

U.S. Subprime-Related Direct Exposure in Citi HoldingsHoldings—Special Asset Pool

 
4157

U.S. Exposure to Commercial Real Estate

 
4258

Direct Exposure to Monolines

 
4359

Highly Leveraged Financing Transactions

 
4460

DERIVATIVES

 
4560

Market Risk Management Process

 
4964

Operational Risk Management Process

 
5166

Country and Cross-Border Risk

 
5367

INTEREST REVENUE/EXPENSE AND YIELDS

 
5468
 

Average Balances and Interest Rates—Assets

 
5569
 

Average Balances and Interest Rates—Liabilities and Equity, and Net Interest Revenue

 
5670
 

Analysis of Changes in Interest Revenue

 
6073
 

Analysis of Changes in Interest Expense and Net Interest Revenue

 
6074

CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY

 
6276
 

Capital Resources

 
6276
 

Common Equity

 
6578
 

Funding


68

and Liquidity

 
7081
 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 
7184

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS


85

FAIR VALUATION

 
7285

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 
7285

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 
7285

TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES

 
7386

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 
7487

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 
8093

OTHER INFORMATION

 
179195
 

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

 
179195
 

Item 1A. Risk Factors

 
181198
 

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

 
182199
 

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 
183200
 

Item 6. Exhibits

 
184201
 

Signatures

 
185202
 

Exhibit Index

 
186203

Table of Contents


THE COMPANY

        Citigroup Inc. (Citigroup and, together with its subsidiaries, the Company, Citi or Citigroup) is a global diversified financial services holding company whose businesses provide a broad range of financial services to consumer and corporate customers. Citigroup has more thanapproximately 200 million customer accounts and does business in more than 100140 countries. Citigroup was incorporated in 1988 under the laws of the State of Delaware.

        The Company is a bank holding company within the meaning of the U.S. Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 registered with, and subject to examination by, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB). Citibank, N.A. is a U.S. national bank subject to supervision and examination by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). Some of the Company's other subsidiaries are also subject to supervision and examination by their respective federal and state authorities.authorities or, in the case of overseas subsidiaries, the regulators of the respective jurisdictions.

        This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with Citigroup's 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K), Citigroup's updated 2008 historical financial statements and notes filed on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on October 13, 2009 and Citigroup's Quarterly ReportReports on Form 10-Q for the quarterquarters ended June 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009. Additional financial, statistical, and business-related information for the third quarter of 2009, as well as business and segment trends, are included in a Financial Supplement that was filedfurnished as Exhibit 99.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)SEC on July 17,October 15, 2009.

        The principal executive offices of the Company are located at 399 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10043, telephone number 212 559 1000. Additional information about Citigroup is available on the Company's web site atwww.citigroup.com. Citigroup's recent annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, as well as the Company's other filings with the SEC, are available free of charge through the Company's web site by clicking on the "Investors" page and selecting "All SEC Filings." The SEC web site contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding the Company atwww.sec.gov.


Table of Contents

        Citigroup is managed along the following segment and product lines:

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

        The following are the four regions in which Citigroup operates. The regional results are fully reflected in the segment results.

GRAPHICGRAPHIC


(1)
Asia includes Japan,Latin America includes Mexico, andNorth America includes U.S., Canada and Puerto Rico.

Table of Contents

CITIGROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA—Page 1

 
 Second Quarter  
 Six Months Ended  
 
In millions of dollars,
except per share amounts
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
 2009 2008 2009 2008 
Net interest revenue $12,829 $13,986  (8)%$25,755 $27,074  (5)%
Non-interest revenue  17,140  3,552  NM  28,735  2,621  NM 
              
Revenues, net of interest expense $29,969 $17,538  71%$54,490 $29,695  83%
Operating expenses  11,999  15,214  (21) 23,684  30,591  (23)
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims  12,676  7,100  79  22,983  12,952  77 
              
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations before Income Taxes $5,294 $(4,776) NM $7,823 $(13,848) NM 
Income taxes (benefits)  907  (2,447) NM  1,742  (6,333) NM 
              
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations $4,387 $(2,329) NM $6,081 $(7,515) NM 
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, net of taxes  (142) (94) (51)% (259) (35) NM 
              
Net Income (Loss) before attribution of Noncontrolling Interests $4,245 $(2,423) NM $5,822 $(7,550) NM 
Net Income (Loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests  (34) 72  NM  (50) 56  NM 
              
Citigroup's Net Income (Loss) $4,279 $(2,495) NM $5,872 $(7,606) NM 
              
Less:                   
 Preferred dividends—Basic $(1,495)$(361) NM $(2,716)$(444) NM 
  Impact of the conversion price reset related to the $12.5 billion convertible preferred stock private issuance—Basic(1)        (1,285)    
 Preferred stock Series H discount accretion—Basic  (54)     (107)    
              
Income (loss) available to common stockholders for Basic EPS $2,730 $(2,856) NM $1,764 $(8,050) NM 
              
Convertible Preferred Stock Dividends  270  270    540  336  61 
              
Income (loss) available to common stockholders for Diluted EPS $3,000 $(2,586) NM $2,304 $(7,714) NM 
              
Earnings per share                   
 Basic(2)                   
 Income (loss) from continuing operations $0.51 $(0.53) NM $0.36 $(1.56) NM 
 Net income (loss)  0.49  (0.55) NM  0.31  (1.57) NM 
              
 Diluted(2)                   
 Income (loss) from continuing operations $0.51 $(0.53) NM $0.36 $(1.56) NM 
 Net income (loss)  0.49  (0.55) NM  0.31  (1.57) NM 
              

 
  
  
  
 Nine Months Ended
September 30,
  
 
 
 Third Quarter  
  
 
In millions of dollars,
except per share amounts
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Net interest revenue

 $11,998 $13,404  (10)%$37,753 $40,478  (7)%

Non-interest revenue

  8,392  2,854  NM  37,127  5,475  NM 
              

Revenues, net of interest expense

 $20,390 $16,258  25%$74,880 $45,953  63%

Operating expenses

  11,824  14,007  (16) 35,508  44,598  (20)

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

  9,095  9,067    32,078  22,019  46 
              

Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations before Income Taxes

 $(529)$(6,816) 92 $7,294 $(20,664) NM 

Income taxes (benefits)

  (1,122) (3,295) 66  620  (9,628) NM 
              

Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations

 $593 $(3,521) NM $6,674 $(11,036) NM 

Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, net of taxes

  (418) 613  NM  (677) 578  NM 
              

Net Income (Loss) before attribution of Noncontrolling Interests

 $175 $(2,908) NM $5,997 $(10,458) NM 

Net Income (Loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

  74  (93) NM  24  (37) NM 
              

Citigroup's Net Income (Loss)

 $101 $(2,815) NM $5,973 $(10,421) NM 
              

Less:

                   
 

Preferred dividends—Basic

 $(272)$(389) 30%$(2,988)$(833) NM 
 

Impact of the conversion price reset related to the $12.5 billion convertible preferred stock private issuance—Basic(1)

        (1,285)   NM 
 

Preferred stock Series H discount accretion—Basic

  (16)   NM  (123)   NM 
 

Impact of the Public and Private Preferred stock exchange offer

  (3,055)   NM  (3,055)   NM 
              

Income (loss) available to common stockholders

  (3,242) (3,204) (1) (1,478) (11,254) 87 
 

Allocation of dividends to common stock and participating securities, net of forfeitures

    (1,738) NM  (63) (5,151) 99 
              

Undistributed earnings (loss) for basic EPS

 $(3,242)$(4,942) 34%$(1,541)$(16,405) 91%

Convertible Preferred Stock Dividends

    270  NM  540  606  (11)
              

Undistributed earnings (loss) for diluted EPS

 $(3,242)$(4,672) 31%$(1,001)$(15,799) 94%
              

Earnings per share

                   
 

Basic(2)

                   
 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $(0.23)$(0.72) 68%$(0.10)$(2.28) 96%
 

Net income (loss)

  (0.27) (0.61) 56  (0.19) (2.17) 91 
              
 

Diluted(2)

                   
 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $(0.23)$(0.72) 68%$(0.10)$(2.28) 96%
 

Net income (loss)

  (0.27) (0.61) 56  (0.19) (2.17) 91 
              

[Continued on the following page, including notes to table.]


Table of Contents

SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA—Page 2

 
 Second Quarter  
 Six Months Ended  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 
At June 30:                   
Total assets $1,848,533 $2,100,385  (12)%         
Total deposits  804,736  803,642            
Long-term debt  348,046  417,928  (17)         
Mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary Trusts (included in Long-term debt)  24,034  23,658  2          
Common stockholders' equity  78,001  108,981  (28)         
Total stockholders' equity $152,302 $136,405  12          
Direct staff(in thousands)  279  363  (23)         
              
Ratios:                   
Return on common stockholders' equity(3)  14.8% (10.4)%    4.9% (14.5)%   
              
Tier 1 Common(4)  2.75% 4.43%            
Tier 1 Capital  12.74% 8.74%            
Total Capital  16.62% 12.29%            
Leverage(5)  6.92% 5.04%            
              
Common stockholders' equity to assets  4.22% 5.19%            
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends  1.40  0.62     1.23  0.52    
              

 
  
  
  
 Nine Months Ended
September 2009,
  
 
 
 Third Quarter  
  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

At September 30:

                   

Total assets

 $1,888,599 $2,050,131  (8)%         

Total deposits

  832,603  780,343  7          

Long-term debt

  379,557  393,097  (3)         

Mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary Trusts (included in Long-term debt)

  34,531  23,836  45          

Common stockholders' equity

  140,530  98,638  42          

Total stockholders' equity

  140,842  126,062  12          

Direct staff(in thousands)

  276  352  (22)         
              

Ratios:

                   

Return on common stockholders' equity(3)

  (12.2)% (12.2)%    (2.3)% (13.8)%   
              

Tier 1 Common(4)

  9.12% 3.72%            

Tier 1 Capital

  12.76% 8.19%            

Total Capital

  16.58% 11.68%            

Leverage(5)

  6.87% 4.70%            
              

Common stockholders' equity to assets

  7.4% 4.8%            

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends

  0.96  NM     1.16  NM    
              

(1)
The sixFor the nine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009, Income available to common shareholdersstockholders includes a reduction of $1.285 billion related to a conversion price reset pursuant to Citigroup's prior agreement with the purchasers of $12.5 billion convertible preferred stock issued in a private offering in January 2008. The conversion price was reset from $31.62 per share to $26.35 per share. See "Events in 2009—Public and Private Exchange Offers" below. There was no impact to net income, total stockholders' equity or capital ratios due to the reset. However, the reset resulted in a reclassification from Retained earnings to Additional paid-in capital of $1.285 billion and a reduction in Income available to common shareholdersstockholders of $1.285 billion. The 2009 third quarter Income available to common stockholders includes a reduction of $3.055 billion related to the preferred stock exchanged for common stock and trust preferred securities as part of the exchange offers.

(2)
The Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Staff Position (FSP) Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) 03-6-1Codification (ASC) 260-10-45 to 65, "Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities" (Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 260-10-45 to 65) on January 1, 2009. All prior periods have been restated to conform to the current presentation. The Diluted EPS calculation for the secondthird quarter and sixnine months of 2009 and 2008 utilize Basic shares and Income available to common shareholdersstockholders (Basic) due to the negative Income available to common shareholders.stockholders. Using actual Diluted shares and Income available to common shareholdersstockholders (Diluted) would result in anti-dilution.

(3)
The return on average common stockholders' equity is calculated using income (loss) available to common stockholders.

(4)
As defined by the banking regulators, the Tier 1 Common ratio represents Tier 1 Capital less perpetual preferred stock, qualifying noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries and qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts divided by risk-weighted assets. Tier 1 Common ratio is a non-GAAP measure. See "Capital Resources and Liquidity" below for additional information on this measure, including a reconciliaton to the most directly comparable GAAP measure.

(5)
The Leverage ratio represents Tier 1 Capital divided by each period's quarterly adjusted average total assets.

NM    Not meaningful

        Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior periods' financial statements to conform to the current period's presentation.

        Certain statements in this Form 10-Q, including, but not limited to, statements made in "Management's Discussion and Analysis," are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on management's current expectations and are subject to uncertainty and changes in circumstances. Actual results may differ materially from those included in these statements due to a variety of factors including, but not limited to, those described in Citigroup's 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K under "Risk Factors."

Within this Form 10-Q, please refer to the indices on pages 2 and 7386 for page references to the Management's Discussion and Analysis section and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, respectively.


Table of Contents


MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

SECOND THIRD QUARTER OF 2009 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY

        Citigroup reported net income of $4.279 billion, $0.49$101 million, and a loss of ($0.27) per diluted share, for the secondthird quarter of 2009. The results included a $6.7 billion after-tax gain on the sale of Smith Barney. The $0.49 earnings($0.27) loss per share reflected a $3.1 billion charge to retained earnings related to the closing of the exchange offers, the remaining preferred stock dividends required to be paid prior to the closing of the exchange offers and the remaining quarterly accretion of the Series H preferred stock discount (the preferred stock issued to the U.S. Treasury as part of TARP in October 2008). See "TARP and Other Regulatory Programs" below.discount.

        Revenues of $30.0$20.4 billion increased 71%25% from year-ago levels due primarily to the Smith Barney gain on sale and positive revenue marks and gains in Citi Holdings relative to the prior-year period, in Citi Holdings,and a $1.4 billion gain from the extinguishment of debt associated with the closing of the exchange offers. The increase was partially offset by credit valuation adjustments (CVA) of $1.7 billion in Securities and Banking, the impactabsence of Smith Barney revenues of $2.0 billion in the third quarter of 2009 and foreign exchange translation and declines in Regional Consumer Banking revenues, primarily in Cards. The difficult economic environment continued to have a negative impact on all businesses.currency translation.

        Net interest revenue declined 8%10% from the 2008 secondthird quarter, primarily reflecting the Company's smaller balance sheet. Net interest margin in the secondthird quarter of 2009 was 3.24%2.95%, up 7down 20 basis points from the secondthird quarter of 2008, reflecting significantly lower cost of funding, largely offset by a decrease in asset yields related to the decrease in the Federal funds rate, and the FDIC special assessment of $333 million.largely offset by significantly lower funding costs.Non-interest revenue increased $13.6$5.5 billion from a year ago, primarily reflecting the gain on saleabsence of significant losses in the Citi Holdings Special Asset Pool portfolio.

        Operating expenses decreased 16% from the year-ago quarter and were down 1% from the second quarter of 2009 primarily due to divestitures, including Smith Barney, lower write-downs and gains on exposures inthe re-sizing of the Citi Holdings.

Operating expenses decreased 21% fromHoldings businesses, the previous year, reflecting benefits from Citi's ongoing re-engineering efforts,of Citicorp processes, expense control, and the impact of foreign exchangecurrency translation. Headcount of 279,000276,000 was down 84,00076,000 from September 30, 2008 and down 3,000 from June 30, 2008 and 30,000 from March 31, 2009.

        The Company's equity capital base and trust preferred securities were $176.3total allowance for loan losses totaled $36.4 billion at September 30, 2009, a coverage ratio of 5.85% of total loans up from 5.6% at June 30, 2009. Citigroup's stockholders' equity increased2009, even though corporate loans declined by $8.4$13 billion during the second quarter of 2009 to $152.3 billion, primarily reflecting net income less dividend payouts and an improvement inAccumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The Company distributed $1.55 billion in dividends to its preferred stockholders during the quarter. Citigroup had a Tier 1 Capital ratio of 12.74% at June 30, 2009.

        On July 23, 2009 and July 29, 2009, Citigroup closed its exchange offers with the private and public holders, respectively, of preferred stock and trust preferred securities, as applicable ($32.8 billion in aggregate liquidation value). In connection with these exchanges, the U.S. Treasury (UST) also exchanged $25 billion of aggregate liquidation value of its preferred stock, for a total exchange of $57.8consumer loans decreased by $6 billion. Following an increase in Citigroup's authorized common stock, and the conversion of interim securities to common stock, the UST will own approximately 33.6% of Citigroup's outstanding common stock (not including the exercise of the warrants issued to the UST as part of TARP). See "Events of 2009—Public and Private Exchange Offers" and "TARP and Other Regulatory Programs."

        As a result of the closing of the private and public exchange offers, Citigroup will increase its Tier 1 common by approximately $64 billion from the second quarter of 2009 level of $27 billion to approximately $91 billion. In addition, Citigroup's Tangible Common Equity (TCE), which was $40 billion as of June 30, 2009, will increase by approximately $60 billion to approximately $100 billion. (TCE and Tier 1 Common are non-GAAP financial measures. See "Capital Resources and Liquidity" for additional information on these measures, including a reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP measures.)

During the secondthird quarter of 2009, the Company recorded a net build of $3.9 billion$802 million to its credit reserves. The build for the quarter was $3.1 billion lower than the second quarter of 2009, consisting of a net build consisted of $1.2$893 million for consumer loans and a net release of $91 million for corporate loans.

        Consumer non-accrual loans totaled $17.9 billion at September 30, 2009, compared to $15.8 billion at June 30, 2009 and $10.8 billion at September 30, 2008, primarily related to the recognition of SFAS 114 charge-offs in Citicorp ($0.6 billion in Regional Consumer Banking and $0.6 billion in ICG) and $2.7 billion in Citi Holdings (almost all in Local Consumer Lending).the quarter. The consumer loan delinquency rate was 4.70% at September 30, 2009, compared to 4.24% at June 30, 2009 compared to 3.93% at March 31, 2009 and 2.30%2.66% a year ago. Delinquencies continue to rise for the first mortgage portfolio in the U.S. due primarily to the lengthening of the foreclosure process by many states and the increasing impact of the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP). Loans in the HAMP trial modification period are reported as delinquent if the original contractual payments are not received on time (even if the reduced payments agreed to under the program are made by the borrower) until the loan has completed the trial period under the program (see "Loan and Credit Details—Consumer Loan Modification Programs" and "—U.S. Consumer Mortgage Lending" below).

Corporate non-accrual loans were $14.8 billion at September 30, 2009, compared to $12.4 billion at June 30, 2009 compared to $11.2 billion at March 31, 2009 and $2.2$2.7 billion a year-ago.year ago. The increase from the prior quarter is mainly due to the Company's continued policy of actively moving loans into non-accrual at earlier stages of anticipated distress. Over two-thirds of the non-accrual corporate loans are current and continue to make their contractual payments. The increase from prior-year levels is primarilyalso attributable to the transfer of non-accrual loans from the held-for-sale portfolio (which are carried at lower-of-cost-or-fair value and excluded from non-accrual loans) to the held-for-investment portfolio during the fourth quarter of 2008. The total allowance for loan losses totaled $35.9loss reserve balance for funded corporate loans remained stable at $8 billion at June 30, 2009, a coverage ratiothe end of 5.60%the quarter, or 4.4% of total loans.corporate loans, up from 4.1% in the second quarter of 2009.

        The Company's effective tax rate was 17.1%on continuing operations in the secondthird quarter of 2009 whichwas 212% versus 48% in the prior-year period. The tax provision reflected a higher proportion of income earned and indefinitely reinvested in countries with relatively lower tax rates as well as a higher proportion of income from tax advantaged sources. The current quarter also includes a tax benefit of $129$103 million in continuing operations relating to the conclusiona release of an audit of certain issuestax reserves on interchange fees, which was supported by a favorable Tax Court decision in the Company's 2003-2005 U.S. Federal tax audit.a case litigated by another financial institution.

        Total deposits were approximately $804.7$833 billion at September 30, 2009, up 3% from June 30, 2009 and up 6%7% from March 31, 2009 and flat with prior-yearyear-ago levels. At JuneSeptember 30, 2009, the Company hashad increased its structural liquidity (equity, long-term debt and deposits) as a percentage of assets from 68%66% at MarchDecember 31, 20092008 to approximately 71%72% at JuneSeptember 30, 2009. Over the past six months, Citigroup and its subsidiaries have issued $20 billion of non-guaranteed debt outside of the FDIC's TLGP.

        Citigroup has continued its deleveraging, reducing total assets from $2,100$2,050 billion a year ago to $1,849$1,889 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2009. Asset reductions in Citi Holdings made up approximately 98% of the decline, reflecting the Company's continued strategy of reducing its assets and exposures in this business segment, which are down by almost one-third since the peak levels of early 2008.

        Primarily as a result of the exchange offers, Citigroup increased its Tier 1 Common by $63 billion from the second quarter of 2009 to $90 billion. In Julyaddition, the Company's Tangible Common Equity (TCE) increased by $62 billion from the second quarter of 2009 Citi appointed three new directors to its board. Additionally,$102 billion at September 30, 2009. (TCE and Tier 1 Common are non-GAAP financial


Table of Contents

measures. See "Capital Resources and Liquidity" for additional information on these measures.)

        The closing of the Company recently announced several senior management appointments, including John Gerspach as Chief Financial Officer, replacing Ned Kelly, who was appointed Vice Chairmanexchange offers also resulted in a reconstitution of Citigroup,the Company's equity base. Common Equity increased 98% from December 31, 2008 to $140.5 billion. Citigroup's total stockholders' equity decreased by $11.5 billion during the third quarter of 2009 to $140.8 billion, primarily reflecting the impact of the exchange offers, partially offset by a $4.0 billion improvement inAccumulated Other Comprehensive Income. Citigroup's total equity capital base and Eugene McQuade as Chief Executive Officer for Citibank, N.A.trust preferred securities were $175.4 billion at September 30, 2009. The Tier 1 Capital ratio and Tier 1 Common ratio were 12.76% and 9.12%, respectively, at September 30, 2009.


Table of Contents


SIGNIFICANT EVENTS IN THE THIRD QUARTER OF 2009

        Certain significant events have occurred during the fiscal year to date, including events subsequent to JuneSeptember 30, 2009, that had, or could have, an effect on Citigroup's current and future financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and capital resources. Certain of theseThese events are summarized below and discussed in more detail throughout this MD&A.

PUBLIC AND PRIVATE EXCHANGE OFFERS

Private Exchange Offers

        On July 23, 2009, Citigroup closed its exchange offers with the private holders of $12.5 billion aggregate liquidation value of preferred stock. As previously disclosed, theThe U.S. Treasury (UST) matched these exchange offers by exchanging $12.5 billion aggregate liquidation value of its preferred stock, for a total closing of $25 billion. The preferredFollowing the approval, on September 2, 2009, by Citi shareholders of an increase in Citi's authorized common stock, held byon September 10, 2009, the private holders and the UST was exchanged forreceived an aggregate of approximately 7,692 shares of interim securities and warrants. The warrants will terminate and the interim securities will automatically convert into Citigroup common stock upon the increase, subject to shareholder approval, in Citigroup's authorized common stock at a ratio of one million shares of common stock for each interim security. Following the authorized share increase, the interim securities issued to the private holders and the UST in this closing will convert into approximately 7.7 billion shares of Citigroup common stock.

        The shareholder approval on the proposed increase in Citigroup's authorized common stock is scheduled to occur on September 2, 2009. In addition, see "Public Exchange Offers" below.

Public Exchange Offers

        On July 29, 2009, Citigroup closed its exchange offers with certainthe holders of its publicly-held preferred stock and trust preferred securities. Approximately $20.3approximately $20.4 billion in aggregate liquidation value of publicly-held preferred stock and trust preferred securities, were validly tendered and not withdrawn in the public exchange offers. This representsrepresenting 99% of the total liquidation value of securities that Citigroup was offering to exchange.

Upon closing of the public exchange offers, Citi issued approximately 5.8 billion shares of common stock to the public exchange offer participants. In accordance with the instructions given by the participants in the public exchange offers, these shares of common stock are subject to an irrevocable proxy to vote in favor of the proposal to increase Citigroup's authorized common stock, among other matters, which will result in the termination of the warrants and the automatic conversion of the interim securities issued to the UST and the private holders in the private exchange offers into common stock (see "Private Exchange Offers" above).

        In addition, as previously disclosed, on July 30, 2009, the UST matched the public exchange offers by exchanging an additional $12.5 billion aggregate liquidation value of its preferred stock. Following the increase in Citigroup's authorized common stock, resulting in Citi's issuing approximately 3,846 additional shares of interim securities toon September 10, 2009, the UST and increasing the number of shares of common stock the UST may acquire upon exercise of the warrant issued to it in connection with the private exchange offers closing. The warrant will terminate and these interim securities will convert intoreceived an additional approximately 3.8 billion shares of Citigroup common stock following the authorized share increase.stock.

        In total, approximately $58 billion in aggregate liquidation value of preferred stock and trust preferred securities were exchanged tofor common stock and interim securities asupon completion of all stages of the exchange offers. As a result of the completion of the private and public exchange offers, and the associated exchange by the UST. Upon the increase in Citigroup's authorized common stock, and the conversion of the interim securities to common stock, the UST will ownowned approximately 33.6% of Citigroup's outstanding common stock, not including the exercise of the warrants issued to the UST as part of TARP and pursuant to the loss-sharing agreement. See "TARP and Other Regulatory"Government Programs" below.

Capital Impact

        As a result of the closing of the private and public exchange offers and the associated exchange by the UST on a proforma basis, Citigroup increased its Tier 1 Common by approximately $64 billion from the second quarter of 2009 level of approximately $27 billion to approximately $91 billion. In addition, Citigroup's tangible common equity (TCE), which was approximately $40 billion as of June 30, 2009, increased by approximately $60 billion to approximately $100 billion on a proforma basis. (TCE and Tier 1 Common are non-GAAP financial measures. See "Capital Resources and Liquidity" below for additional information on these measures, including a reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP measures.)

8% Trust Preferred Securities

        On July 30, 2009, all remaining preferred stock of Citigroup held by the UST and FDIC (the UST and FDIC are collectively referred to as the "USG")FDIC that was not exchanged into Citigroup common stock in connection with the private or public exchange offers, in an aggregate liquidation amount of approximately $27.1 billion, was exchanged into newly issued 8% trust preferred securities. An aggregate liquidation amount of approximately $27.1 billion in trust preferred securities was issued to the USG in exchange for an aggregate of $27.059 billion liquidation value of preferred stock.

Accounting Impact

        The accounting for the exchange offers will resultresulted in the de-recognition of preferred stock and the recognition of the common stock issued at fair value in theCommon stock andAdditional paid-in capital accounts in equity. The difference between the carrying amount of preferred stock and the fair value of the common stock will bewas recorded inRetained earnings (impacting net income available to common shareholders and EPS) orAdditional paid-in capital accounts in equity, depending on whether the preferred stock was originally non-convertible or convertible.

        For USGthe U.S. Government (USG) preferred stock that was converted to 8% trust preferred securities, the newly issued trust preferred securities will bewere initially recorded at fair value asLong-term debt. The difference between the carrying amount of the preferred stock and the fair value of the trust preferred securities will be


Table of Contents

was recorded inRetained earnings after adjusting for the appropriate deferred tax liability (impacting net income available to common shareholders and EPS). For trust preferred securities exchanged for common stock, the carrying amount currently recorded as long-term debt will bewas de-recognized and the common stock issued will bewas recorded at fair value in theCommon Stock and theAdditional Paid-in Capital accounts in equity. The difference between the carrying amount of the trust preferred securities and the fair value of the common stock will bewas recorded in Other revenue in the current earningsthird quarter of the period in which the transaction will occur.2009.


Table of Contents

        The following table presents the impact of the completion of all stages of the exchange offers to Citigroup's common shares outstanding and to its balance sheet:

(in millions of dollars, except incremental number of Citigroup common shares)
 Impact on 
Security Notional
Amounts
 Converting
Into
 Incremental
Number of
Citigroup
Common
Shares
 Date of
Settlement
 Other
Assets(4)
 Long-
Term
Debt
 Preferred
Stock
 Common
Stock
 Additional
Paid In
Capital
 Income
Statement(3)
 Retained
Earnings(2)
 
 
  
  
 (in millions)
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 

Convertible Preferred Stock held by Private Investors

 $12,500 Interim
Securities/
Common
Stock(1)
  3,846  7/23/2009 $   $(12,500)$38 $21,801 $ $(9,340)

Convertible Preferred Stock held by Public Investors

  3,146 Common
Stock
  823  7/29/2009      (3,146) 8  5,127    (1,990)

Non-Convertible Preferred Stock held by Public Investors

  11,465 Common
Stock
  3,351  7/29/2009      (11,465) 34  9,116    2,316 

Trust Preferred Securities held by Public Investors

  5,760 Common
Stock
  1,660  7/29/2009  (622)* (6,034)*   17  4,515  893* 893*

USG TARP Preferred Stock matching the Preferred Stock held by Private Investors

  12,500 Interim
Securities/
Common
Stock(1)
  3,846  7/23/2009      (11,924) 38  10,615    1,270 

USG TARP Preferred Stock matching the Preferred Stock and Trust Preferred Securities held by Public Investors

  12,500 Interim
Securities/
Common
Stock(1)
  3,846  7/30/2009      (11,926) 38  10,615    1,272 

USG TARP Preferred Stock

  20,000 TruPS    7/30/2009  (2,883) 12,004  (19,514)       4,627 

Non-Convertible Preferred Stock held by U.S. Treasury and FDIC related to covered asset guarantee (loss-sharing agreement)

  7,059 TruPS    7/30/2009  (503) 4,237  (3,530)       (1,210)

Total

       17,372    $(4,008)$10,207 $(74,005)$173 $61,789 $893 $(2,162)

(in millions of dollars, except incremental number of Citigroup common shares)
 Impact on 
Security Notional
Amounts
 Converted
Into
 Incremental
Number of
Citigroup
Common
Shares
 Date of
Settlement
 Other
Assets(3)
 Long-
Term
Debt
 Preferred
Stock
 Common
Stock
 Additional
Paid In
Capital
 Income
Statement(2)
 Retained
Earnings(1)
 
 
  
  
 (in millions)
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 

Convertible Preferred Stock held by Private Investors

 $12,500 Common Stock  3,846  7/23/2009 $   $(12,500)$38 $21,801 $ $(9,340)

Convertible Preferred Stock held by Public Investors

  3,146 Common Stock  823  7/29/2009      (3,146) 8  5,128    (1,990)

Non-Convertible Preferred Stock held by Public Investors

  11,465 Common Stock  3,351  7/29/2009      (11,465) 33  9,116    2,316 

Trust Preferred Securities held by Public Investors

  5,773 Common Stock  1,660  7/29/2009  (602) (5,972)   17  4,515  851  851 

USG TARP Preferred Stock matching the Preferred Stock held by Private Investors

  12,500 Common Stock  3,846  7/23/2009      (11,924) 38  10,615    1,270 

USG TARP Preferred Stock matching the Preferred Stock and Trust Preferred Securities held by Public Investors

  12,500 Common Stock  3,846  7/30/2009      (11,926) 39  10,615    1,272 

USG TARP Preferred Stock

  20,000 TruPS    7/30/2009  (2,883) 12,004  (19,514)       4,627 

Non-Convertible Preferred Stock held by U.S. Treasury and FDIC related to covered asset guarantee (loss-sharing agreement)

  7,059 TruPS    7/30/2009  (503) 4,237  (3,530)       (1,210)

Total

       17,372    $(3,988)$10,269 $(74,005)$173 $61,790 $851 $(2,204)

*
Preliminary and subject to change

Note: Table may not foot due to roundings.

Summary of Impact of Exchange Offers

        The additional estimatedDuring the third quarter of 2009, TCE increased by $60 billion of TCE is primarily theas a result of the exchange of approximately $74 billion carrying amount of preferred shares and $6 billion carrying value of trust preferred securities for 17,372 million shares of common stock and approximately $27.1 billion liquidation amount of trust preferred securities (recorded asLong-term Debtdebt at its fair value of $16.2 billion). This resulted in an increase to common stock and APIC of $62 billion and a reduction inRetained earnings of approximately $2 billion, for a total increase in TCE of approximately $60 billion.

The additional $64 billion of Tier 1 Common includes the impact of the above plus a reduction in the disallowed Deferred tax asset (which increases Tier 1 Common) that arises from the accounting for the transactions. TCE and Tier 1 Common are non-GAAP financial measures. See "Capital Resources and Liquidity" below for additional information on these measures, including a reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP measures.

(1)
Upon shareholder approval of the increase in Citigroup's authorized common stock, the interim securities will be automatically converted into common stock (anticipated in early September 2009).

(2)
TheRetained earnings impact primarily reflects:

a)
Difference between the carrying value of the preferred stock exchanged versus the fair value of the common stock and trust preferred securities issued.

b)
Value of inducement offer to the convertible preferred stock holders (calculated as the incremental shares received in excess of the original terms multiplied by stock price on the commitment date).; and

c)
Estimated after-taxAfter-tax gain from extinguishment of debt associated with the trust preferred securities held by public investors.

(3)(2)
Estimated after-taxAfter-tax gain to be reflected in third quarter 2009 earnings of approximately $0.9 billion from the extinguishment of debt associated with the trust preferred securities held by public investors.

(4)(3)
Primarily represents the impact on deferred taxes of the various exchange transactions, which will benefit Tier 1 Common and Tier 1 Capital.

        Earnings per share in the third quarter of 2009 will bewas impacted by (1) the increase in shares outstanding as a result of the issuance of common shares and interim securities and the timing thereof, (2) the net impact toRetained earnings and income statement resulting from the preferred share and trust preferred securities exchange offers and (3) dividends on USG preferred shares accrued up to the date of their conversion to interim securities and trust preferred securities.


Table of Contents


DEFERRED TAX BENEFITS PRESERVATION PLANASSET

        Deferred taxes are recorded for the future consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or tax returns, based upon enacted tax laws and rates. Deferred tax assets (DTAs) are recognized subject to management's judgment that realization is more likely than not.

        As of JuneSeptember 30, 2009, Citigroup had recognized a net deferred tax assetsasset of approximately $38 billion, down $4 billion from approximately $42 billion a portionat June 30, 2009 and down $6.5 billion from approximately $44.5 billion at December 31, 2008. Approximately $13 billion of whichthe net deferred tax asset is included in TCE.Tier 1 and Tier 1 Common regulatory capital. The principal items reducing the deferred tax asset during 2009 were a decrease of approximately $3.9 billion relating to the exchange offers and $2.8 billion due to an increase in Other Comprehensive Income.

        Although realization is not assured, the Company believes that the realization of the recognized net deferred tax asset at September 30, 2009 is more likely than not based upon expectations of future taxable income in the jurisdictions in which it operates and available tax planning strategies.

        Approximately $17 billion of Citigroup's DTA is represented by U.S. federal, state and local tax return carry-forwards subject to expiration substantially beginning in 2017 and continuing through 2028. The remaining $21 billion DTA is largely due to timing differences between the recognition of income for GAAP and tax, representing net deductions that have not yet been taken on a tax return and are not currently subject to expiration. The most significant source of these timing differences is the loan loss reserve build, which accounts for approximately $14 billion of the net DTA. In general, Citigroup would need to generate approximately $85 billion of taxable income during the respective carry-forward periods to fully realize its U.S. federal, state and local DTA.

        Citi's ability to utilize its deferred tax assets to offset future taxable income may be significantly limited if Citi experiences an "ownership change",change," as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). In general, an ownership change will occur if there is a cumulative change in Citi's ownership by "5% shareholders" (as defined in the Code) that exceeds 50 percentage points over a rolling three-year period. As such, if the Company experiences an ownership change, its TCE may be reduced.

        While theThe common stock issued pursuant to the private and public exchange offers (described above) did not result in an ownership change under the Code, the common stock issued did increase the cumulative change percentage for Section 382 purposes.Code. On June 9, 2009, the board of directors of Citigroup adopted a tax benefits preservation plan (the "Plan"). The purpose of the Plan is to minimize the likelihood of an ownership change occurring for Section 382 purposes and thus protect Citigroup's ability to utilize certain of its deferred tax assets, such as net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards, to offset future income.

        In connection with the Despite adoption of the Plan, Citigroup's boardfuture stock issuance or transactions in our stock that may not be in our control, including sales by the USG, may cause Citi to experience an ownership change and thus limit the Company's ability to utilize its deferred tax asset and reduce its TCE and stockholders' equity.

DIVESTITURES

Sale of directors declared a dividend of one preferred stock purchase right (a "Right") for each outstanding (i) share of common and (ii) 1-millionth of a share of the interim securities. The dividend was paid to holders of record of Citigroup's common stock on June 22, 2009. Shares of Citigroup's common stock and interim securities issued after June 22, 2009 will be issued with the Right attached. The terms and conditions of the Rights are set forth in the Tax Benefits Preservation Plan attached as Exhibit 4.1 to Citigroup's Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 10, 2009.

THE SUPERVISORY CAPITAL ASSESSMENT PROGRAMNikko Cordial Securities

        On May 7,October 1, 2009, Citigroup completed the USG released the resultssale of its Supervisory Capital Assessment Program (SCAP)domestic Japanese domestic securities business, conducted principally through Nikko Cordial Securities Inc. (NCS) to Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation in a transaction with a total cash value of approximately $8.7 billion (¥776 billion). The SCAP constituted a comprehensive capital assessmenttransaction will be recorded in the fourth quarter of 2009. After considering the impact of foreign exchange hedges of the 19 largest U.S. financial institutions, including Citi. Based on the resultsproceeds of the USG's assessment undertransaction (most of which has been recorded in the SCAP, Citi was requiredsecond and third quarters of 2009), the sale will result in an immaterial after-tax gain to increase its previously announced plan to increase Tier 1 Common by an additional $5.5 billion. See "Events in 2009—Public and Private Exchange Offers" above. In addition, Citi was required to develop and submit a capital plan to the FRB and FDIC. The Company submitted its capital plan to the regulators on June 8, 2009, as required. For additional information on the requirements of the capital plan, as well as other information on SCAP, see the "Events in 2009" section of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009.

LOSS-SHARING AGREEMENTCitigroup.

        On January 15, 2009, Citigroup issued preferred shares to the UST and the FDIC, and a warrant to the UST, in exchange for $301 billion of loss protection on a specified pool of Citigroup assets. The Company is required to absorb the first $39.5 billion of qualifying losses under the agreement, plus 10% of the remaining losses incurred.

        As a result of receipt of principal repayments and charge-offs, the total asset pool has declined by approximately $35 billion from the original $301 billion to approximately $266.4 billion. Approximately $2.5 billion of GAAP losses on the asset pool were recordedBeginning in the second quarter of 2009, bringing the GAAP losses to date to approximately $5.3 billion. See "TARPresults of NCS and Other Regulatory Programs—U.S. Government Loss-Sharing Agreement" below.its related companies are reflected as Discontinued Operations in the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements. At September 30, 2009, assets of $23.6 billion and liabilities of $16.0 billion are reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as "Assets/ Liabilities of discontinued operations held for sale", respectively, including $3.8 billion of identifiable goodwill and intangibles.

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

        The shares of preferred stock issuedAs required by SFAS 165, Subsequent Events, the Company has evaluated subsequent events through November 6, 2009, which is the date its Consolidated Financial Statements were issued.

ACCOUNTING CHANGES AND FUTURE APPLICATION OF ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

        See Note 1 to the USTConsolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of "Accounting Changes" and FDIC in consideration for the loss-sharing agreement were subsequently exchanged into newly issued 8% trust preferred securities pursuant to the exchange offers, as described under "Public and Private Exchange Offers" above. For additional information"Future Application of the warrant issued to the UST as part of this transaction, see "TARP and Other Regulatory Programs" below.Accounting Standards."


Table of Contents

ITEMS IMPACTING CITICORP—
SEGMENT, BUSINESS AND PRODUCT INCOME (LOSS) AND REVENUES

        The following tables show the income (loss) and revenues for Citigroup on a segment, business and product view:


Citigroup Income (Loss)

 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars
 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Income from Continuing Operations

                   

CITICORP

                   

Regional Consumer Banking

                   
 

North America

 $163 $(44) NM $345 $470  (27)%
 

EMEA

  (23) 31  NM  (166) 87  NM 
 

Latin America

  29  102  (72)% 268  867  (69)
 

Asia

  446  357  25  969  1,344  (28)
              
  

Total

 $615 $446  38 $1,416 $2,768  (49)%
              

Securities and Banking

                   
 

North America

 $(77)$1,340  NM $2,493 $3,368  (26)%
 

EMEA

  548  102  NM  3,466  674  NM 
 

Latin America

  216  227  (5)% 1,137  853  33 
 

Asia

  68  569  (88) 1,720  1,502  15 
              
  

Total

 $755 $2,238  (66)%$8,816 $6,397  38%
              

Transaction Services

                   
 

North America

 $152 $94  62%$471 $243  94%
 

EMEA

  308  348  (11) 984  925  6 
 

Latin America

  148  159  (7) 458  451  2 
 

Asia

  331  317  4  904  899  1 
              
  

Total

 $939 $918  2%$2,817 $2,518  12%
              
 

Institutional Clients Group

 $1,694 $3,156  (46)%$11,633 $8,915  30%

Total Citicorp

 $2,309 $3,602  (36)%$13,049 $11,683  12%
              

CITI HOLDINGS

                   

Brokerage and Asset Management

 $139 $(57) NM $7,011 $96  NM 

Local Consumer Lending

  (2,099) (2,285) 8% (7,711) (3,366) NM 

Special Asset Pool

  142  (4,594) NM  (5,095) (18,041) 72%

Total Citi Holdings

 $(1,818)$(6,936) 74%$(5,795)$(21,311) 73%
              

Corporate/Other

 $102 $(187) NM $(580)$(1,408) 59 

Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations

 $593 $(3,521) NM $6,674 $(11,036) NM 
              

Discontinued Operations

 $(418)$613    $(677)$578    

Net Income (Loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

  74 $(93)    24 $(37)   
              

Citigroup's Net Income (Loss)

 $101 $(2,815) NM $5,973 $(10,421) NM 
              

NM    Not meaningful


Table of Contents


Citigroup Revenues

 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars
 2009 2008 2009 2008 

CITICORP

                   

Regional Consumer Banking

                   
 

North America

 $1,754 $1,472  19%$5,604 $5,917  (5)%
 

EMEA

  415  498  (17) 1,169  1,467  (20)
 

Latin America

  1,826  2,300  (21) 5,436  6,906  (21)
 

Asia

  1,680  1,839  (9) 4,842  5,674  (15)
              
  

Total

 $5,675 $6,109  (7)%$17,051 $19,964  (15)%
              

Securities and Banking

                   
 

North America

 $1,312 $4,018  (67)%$8,454 $11,117  (24)%
 

EMEA

  2,198  1,395  58  8,974  5,098  76 
 

Latin America

  703  469  50  2,547  1,872  36 
 

Asia

  680  1,463  (54) 4,214  4,382  (4)
              
  

Total

 $4,893 $7,345  (33)%$24,189 $22,469  8%
              

Transaction Services

                   
 

North America

 $643 $540  19%$1,888 $1,557  21%
 

EMEA

  845  953  (11) 2,549  2,784  (8)
 

Latin America

  337  378  (11) 1,020  1,092  (7)
 

Asia

  632  695  (9) 1,857  2,029  (8)
              
  

Total

 $2,457 $2,566  (4)$7,314 $7,462  (2)%
              
 

Institutional Clients Group

 $7,350 $9,911  (26)%$31,503 $29,931  5%

Total Citicorp

 $13,025 $16,020  (19)%$48,554 $49,895  (3)%
              

CITI HOLDINGS

                   

Brokerage and Asset Management

 $670 $2,094  (68)%$14,710 $6,951  NM 

Local Consumer Lending

  4,647  5,432  (14) 15,030  19,156  (22)%

Special Asset Pool

  1,377  (6,822) NM  (3,844) (27,842) 86 

Total Citi Holdings

 $6,694 $704  NM $25,896 $(1,735) NM 
              

Corporate/Other

 $671 $(466) NM $430 $(2,207) NM 

Total Net Revenues

 $20,390 $16,258  25%$74,880 $45,953  63%
              

NM    Not meaningful


Table of Contents


CITICORP

 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 
 

Net interest revenue

 $8,435 $8,316  1%$25,067 $24,980   
 

Non-interest revenue

  4,590  7,704  (40) 23,487  24,915  (6)%
              

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $13,025 $16,020  (19)%$48,554 $49,895  (3)%
              

Provision for credit losses and for benefits and claims

                   
 

Net credit losses

 $1,718 $1,317  30%$4,515 $3,535  28%
 

Credit reserve build (release)

  465  799  (42) 2,570  1,846  39 
              
 

Provision for loan losses

 $2,183 $2,116  3 $7,085 $5,381  32%
 

Provision for benefits & claims

  14      41  3  NM 
 

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

    (80) 100  115  (155) NM 
              
  

Total provision for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 $2,197 $2,036  8%$7,241 $5,229  38%
              

Total operating expenses

 $8,181 $8,948  (9)$23,227 $28,174  (18)%
              

Income from continuing operations before taxes

 $2,647 $5,036  (47)%$18,086 $16,492  10%

Provision for income taxes

  338  1,434  (76) 5,037  4,809  5 
              

Income from continuing operations

 $2,309 $3,602  (36)%$13,049 $11,683  12%

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  25  16  56  25  50  (50)
              

Citicorp's net income

 $2,284 $3,586  (36)%$13,024 $11,633  12%
              

Balance Sheet Data (in billions)

                   

Total EOP assets

 $1,014 $1,158  (12)%         

Average assets

 $1,032 $1,175  (12)%$1,024 $1,287  (20)%

Total EOP deposits

 $728 $683  7%         
              

NM    Not meaningful


Table of Contents


REGIONAL CONSUMER BANKING

 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Net interest revenue

 $3,992 $4,224  (5)%$11,508 $12,429  (7)%

Non-interest revenue

  1,683  1,885  (11) 5,543  7,535  (26)
              

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $5,675 $6,109  (7)%$17,051 $19,964  (15)%
              

Total operating expenses

 $3,547 $4,029  (12)%$10,344 $12,005  (14)%
              
  

Net credit losses

 $1,426 $1,096  30%$3,978 $2,940  35%
  

Credit reserve build (release)

  319  514  (38) 1,575  1,346  17 
  

Provision for benefits & claims

  14      41  3  NM 
              

Provision for loan losses and for benefits and claims

 $1,759 $1,610  9%$5,594 $4,289  30%
              

Income from continuing operations before taxes

  369 $470  (21) 1,113 $3,670  (70)%

Income taxes (benefits)

  (246) 24  NM  (303) 902  NM 
              

Income from continuing operations

 $615 $446  38%$1,416 $2,768  (49)%

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  2  5  (60) 2  10  (80)
              

Net income

 $613 $441  39%$1,414 $2,758  (49)%
              

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $201 $222  (9)% 191 $225  (15)%

Return on assets

  1.21% 0.79%    0.99% 1.64%   

Average deposits(in billions of dollars)

  275  266  3%         

Net credit losses as a % of average loans

  4.70% 3.35%            
              

Revenue by business

                   
 

Retail Banking

 $3,315 $3,531  (6)%$9,463 $10,559  (10)%
 

Citi-Branded Cards

  2,360  2,578  (8) 7,588  9,405  (19)
              
   

Total revenues

 $5,675 $6,109  (7)%$17,051 $19,964  (15)%
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations by business

                   
 

Retail Banking

 $609 $563  8%$1,480 $1,826  (19)%
 

Citi-Branded Cards

  6  (117) NM  (64) 942  NM 
              
   

Total

 $615 $446  38%$1,416 $2,768  (49)%
              

NM    Not meaningful


Table of Contents


NORTH AMERICA REGIONAL CONSUMER BANKING

 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Net interest revenue

 $1,224 $978  25%$3,394 $2,673  27%

Non-interest revenue

  530  494  7  2,210  3,244  (32)
              

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $1,754 $1,472  19%$5,604 $5,917  (5)%
              

Total operating expenses

 $1,331 $1,444  (8)%$4,023 $4,507  (11)%
              
 

Net credit losses

 $280 $144  94%$843 $425  98%
 

Credit reserve build (release)

  30  (9) NM  402  286  41 
 

Provision for benefits and claims

  14      41  2  NM 
              

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

 $324 $135  NM $1,286 $713  80%
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes

 $99 $(107) NM $295 $697  (58)%

Income taxes (benefits)

  (64) (63) (2)% (50) 227  NM 
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $163 $(44) NM $345 $470  (27)%

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

             
              

Net income (loss)

 $163 $(44) NM $345 $470  (27)%
              

Average deposits(in billions of dollars)

 $139 $121  15%         

Net credit losses as a % of average loans

  5.94% 3.51%            
              

Revenue by business

                   
 

Retail banking

 $1,070 $1,004  7%$2,907 $2,806  4%
 

Citi-branded cards

  684  468  46  2,697  3,111  (13)
              
  

Total

 $1,754 $1,472  19%$5,604 $5,917  (5)%
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations by business

                   
 

Retail banking

 $150 $143  5%$319 $205  56%
 

Citi-branded cards

  13  (187) NM  26  265  (90)
              
  

Total

 $163 $(44) NM $345 $470  (27)%
              

NM    Not meaningful

3Q09 vs. 3Q08

        Overall, most key revenue drivers in North America regional consumer banking were stable or higher in the third quarter of 2009 as compared to the second quarter of 2009. The key focus in Citi's North America consumer businesses will likely remain on engagement with customers to raise deposits and to offer loans. However, recovery is expected to be driven by improvement in credit in the key North American businesses. For a further discussion, see "Loan and Credit Details—Consumer Loan Modification Programs" and "—U.S. Consumer Mortgage Lending" below.

Revenues, net of interest expense, increased 19%, primarily reflecting higher net interest margin in cards, higher volumes in retail banking, and better securitization revenue, offset by higher credit losses in the securitization trusts.Net interest revenue was up 25% driven by higher net interest margin in cards as a result of higher interest revenue from pricing actions and lower funding costs, and by the impact of higher deposit and loan volumes in retail banking. Average deposits were 15% higher than the prior year, driven by growth in both consumer and commercial deposits.Non-interest revenue increased 7% primarily driven by better securitization revenue, partially offset by higher credit losses flowing through the securitization trusts.

Operating expenses declined 8%, primarily reflecting the benefits from re-engineering efforts and lower marketing costs.

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased $189 million primarily due to rising net credit losses in both cards and retail banking. Continued weakening of leading credit indicators and trends in the macro-economic environment, including rising unemployment and higher bankruptcy filings, drove higher credit costs. The cards net credit loss ratio increased 339 basis points to 7.06%, while the retail banking net credit loss ratio increased 120 basis points to 4.23%.

        The increase inNet Income also reflected a tax benefit resulting from the federal tax reserve release in the third quarter of 2009.

3Q09 YTD vs. 3Q08 YTD

Revenues, net of interest expense, declined 5%, primarily reflecting higher credit losses in the securitization trusts, offset by higher net interest margin in cards and higher volumes in retail banking.Net interest revenue was up 27% driven by the impact of pricing actions and lower funding costs in cards, and by higher deposit volumes in retail banking, with average deposits up 10% from the prior-year period.Non-interest revenue declined 32% driven by higher credit losses flowing through the securitization trusts partially offset by better


Table of Contents

securitization revenue, and by the absence of a $349 million gain on the sale of Visa shares and a $170 million gain from a cards portfolio sale in the prior-year period.

Operating expenses declined 11%, reflecting the benefits from re-engineering efforts, lower marketing costs, and the absence of $126 million of repositioning charges recorded in the prior-year period, offset by the absence of a prior-year $159 million Visa litigation reserve release.

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased $573 million or 80% primarily due to rising net credit losses in both cards and retail banking. Continued weakening of leading credit indicators and trends in the macro-economic environment, including rising unemployment and higher bankruptcy filings, drove higher credit costs. The cards net credit loss ratio increased 332 basis points to 6.74%, while the retail banking net credit loss ratio increased 70 basis points to 4.12%.


Table of Contents


EMEA REGIONAL CONSUMER BANKING

 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Net interest revenue

 $262 $350  (25)%$729 $984  (26)%

Non-interest revenue

  153  148  3  440  483  (9)
              

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $415 $498  (17)%$1,169 $1,467  (20)%
              

Total operating expenses

 $270 $372  (27)%$808 $1,142  (29)%
              
 

Net credit losses

 $139 $55  NM $349 $150  NM 
 

Credit reserve build (release)

  67  33  NM  297  64  NM 
              

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

 $206 $88  NM $646 $214  NM 
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes

 $(61)$38  NM $(285)$111  NM 

Income taxes (benefits)

  (38) 7  NM  (119) 24  NM 
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $(23)$31  NM $(166)$87  NM 

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  2  5  (60)% 2  11  (82)%
              

Net income (loss)

 $(25)$26  NM $(168)$76  NM 
              

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $11 $14  (21)%$11 $14  (21)%

Return on assets

  (0.90)% 0.74%    (2.04)% 0.73%   

Average deposits(in billions of dollars)

  10  11  (9)%         

Net credit losses as a % of average loans

  6.34% 2.10%            
              

Revenue by business

                   
 

Retail banking

 $237 $310  (24)%$676 $931  (27)%
 

Citi-branded cards

  178  188  (5) 493  536  (8)
              
  

Total

 $415 $498  (17)%$1,169 $1,467  (20)%
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations by business

                   
 

Retail banking

 $(23)$(2) NM $(140)$(4) NM 
 

Citi-branded cards

    33  (100)% (26) 91  NM 
              
  

Total

 $(23)$31  NM $(166)$87  NM 
              

NM    Not meaningful

3Q09 vs. 3Q08

Revenues, net of interest expense, declined 17%. More than half of the revenue decline was attributable to changes in foreign currency translation (generally referred to throughout this report as "FX translation"). Other drivers included lower wealth management and lending revenues due to lower volumes and spread compression. Investment sales and assets under management declined by 29% and 25%, respectively.Net interest revenue was 25% lower than the prior-year period with average loans for retail banking down 22% as a result of a lower risk profile, branch closures and the impact of FX translation.

Operating expenses declined 27%, reflecting expense control actions, lower marketing expenditure and the impact of FX translation. Cost savings were primarily achieved by branch closures, headcount reductions and re-engineering efforts.

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased $118 million to $206 million in the third quarter of 2009. While delinquencies improved during the third quarter of 2009 as compared to the second quarter of 2009, net credit losses continued to increase from $55 million to $139 million, and the loan loss reserve build increased from $33 million to $67 million. Higher credit costs reflected continued credit deterioration, particularly in the UAE, Turkey, Poland and Russia.

3Q09 YTD vs. 3Q08 YTD

Revenues, net of interest expense, declined 20%. Over half of the revenue decline was attributable to the impact of FX translation. Other drivers included lower wealth management and lending revenues due to lower volumes and spread compression. Investment sales and assets under management declined by 42% and 25%, respectively.Net interest revenue was 26% lower than the prior-year period with average loans for retail banking down 20% and average deposits down 22%.Non-interest revenue decreased by 9%, primarily due to the impact of FX translation.

Operating expenses declined 29%, reflecting expense control actions, lower marketing spend and the impact of FX translation. Cost savings were achieved by branch closures, headcount reductions and re-engineering efforts.

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased $432 million to $646 million. Net credit losses increased from $150 million to $349 million, while the loan loss reserve build increased from $64 million to $297 million. Higher credit costs reflected continued credit deterioration across the region.


Table of Contents


LATIN AMERICA REGIONAL CONSUMER BANKING

 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Net interest revenue

 $1,339 $1,669  (20)%$3,940 $5,046  (22)%

Non-interest revenue

  487  631  (23) 1,496  1,860  (20)
              

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $1,826 $2,300  (21)%$5,436 $6,906  (21)%
              

Total operating expenses

 $1,077 $1,292  (17)%$3,027 $3,475  (13)%
              
 

Net credit losses

 $656 $640  3%$1,809 $1,661  9%
 

Credit reserve build (release)

  141  301  (53) 461  695  (34)
 

Provision for benefits and claims

          1  (100)
              

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

 $797 $941  (15)%$2,270 $2,357  (4)%
              

Income from continuing operations before taxes

 $(48)$67  NM $139 $1,074  (87)%

Income taxes (benefits)

  (77) (35) NM  (129) 207  NM 
              

Income from continuing operations

 $29 $102  (72)%$268 $867  (69)%

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

             
              

Net income

 $29 $102  (72)%$268 $867  (69)%
              

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

  61 $81  (25)% 59 $78  (24)%

Return on assets

  0.19% 0.50%    0.61% 1.48%   

Average deposits(in billions of dollars)

  36  42  (14)%         

Net credit losses as a % of average loans

  9.04  7.79             
              

Revenue by business

                   
 

Retail banking

 $969 $1,067  (9)%$2,843 $3,180  (11)%
 

Citi-branded cards

  857  1,233  (30) 2,593  3,726  (30)
              
  

Total

 $1,826 $2,300  (21)%$5,436 $6,906  (21)%
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations by business

                   
 

Retail banking

 $106 $112  (5)%$436 $573  (24)%
 

Citi-branded cards

  (77) (10) NM  (168) 294  NM 
              
  

Total

 $29 $102  (72)%$268 $867  (69)%
              

NM    Not meaningful

3Q09 vs. 3Q08

Revenues, net of interest expense, declined 21%, mainly due to the impact of FX translation, lower cards receivables and spread compression, partially offset by higher business volumes in retail banking. Net interest revenue was 20% lower than the prior year caused by the decrease in cards receivables as well as lower spreads resulting from a lower risk profile, partially offset by higher business volumes in retail banking. Average deposits were down 14%, due primarily to the impact of FX translation. Non-interest revenue declined 23%, primarily due to the impact of FX translation.

Operating expenses declined 17%, reflecting the benefits from re-engineering efforts and the impact of FX translation.

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims decreased $144 million mainly due to lower loan loss reserve build of $160 million. While delinquencies decreased during the third quarter 2009 as compared to the second quarter 2009, cards net credit loss rates increased from 16.2% to 18.1%. Rising losses were apparent in Brazil and Mexico; however, the business continues to focus on repositioning and de-risking the portfolio, particularly in the Mexico cards business.

3Q09 YTD vs. 3Q08 YTD

Revenues, net of interest expense, declined 21% driven by the impact of FX translation, lower volumes and spread compression in the cards business. Net interest revenue was 22% lower than the prior year with average credit cards loans down 22%, and net interest margin decreasing as well due to the cards spread compression impact. Non-interest revenue declined 20%, primarily due to the decline in cards fees as well as the impact of FX translation.

Operating expenses declined 13%, reflecting the benefits from re-engineering efforts and the impact of FX translation. The prior-year period also included a $257 million expense benefit related to a legal vehicle restructuring in Mexico.

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims decreased $87 million or 4%. Cards net credit loss rates increased from 11.6% to 16.7%. Credit deterioration was apparent in Brazil and Mexico where the business has focused its repositioning and derisking efforts.


Table of Contents


ASIA REGIONAL CONSUMER BANKING

 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Net interest revenue

 $1,167 $1,227  (5)%$3,445 $3,726  (8)%

Non-interest revenue

  513  612  (16) 1,397  1,948  (28)
              

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $1,680 $1,839  (9)%$4,842 $5,674  (15)%
              

Total operating expenses

 $869 $921  (6)%$2,486 $2,881  (14)%
              
 

Net credit losses

 $351 $257  37  977 $704  39%
 

Credit reserve build (release)

  81  189  (57)% 415  301  38 
              

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

 $432 $446  (3)%$1,392 $1,005  39%
              

Income from continuing operations before taxes

 $379 $472  (20)%$964 $1,788  (46)%

Income taxes (benefits)

  (67) 115  NM  (5) 444  NM 
              

Income from continuing operations

 $446 $357  25%$969 $1,344  (28)%

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

          (1) 100 
              

Net income

 $446 $357  25%$969 $1,345  (28)%
              

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $92 $95  (3)%$87 $96  (9)

Return on assets

  1.92% 1.49%    1.49% 1.87%   

Average deposits(in billions of dollars)

  91  93  (2)         

Net credit losses as a % of average loans

  2.17  1.44             
              

Revenue by business

                   
 

Retail banking

 $1,039 $1,150  (10)%$3,037 $3,642  (17)%
 

Citi-branded cards

  641  689  (7) 1,805  2,032  (11)
              
  

Total

 $1,680 $1,839  (9)%$4,842 $5,674  (15)%
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations by business

                   
 

Retail banking

 $376 $310  21%$865 $1,052  (18)%
 

Citi-branded cards

  70  47  49  104  292  (64)
              
  

Total

 $446 $357  25%$969 $1,344  (28)%
              

NM    Not meaningful

3Q09 vs. 3Q08

Revenues, net of interest expense, declined 9% driven by the absence of Visa assets sales gains in the 2008 third quarter, lower investment product revenues, lower loan volumes and the impact of FX translation. Net interest revenue was 5% lower than the prior-year period. Average loans and deposits were down 9% and 1%, respectively, in each case primarily due to the impact of FX translation. Non-interest revenue declined 16%, primarily due to the decline in investment revenues, lower Cards Purchase sales, the absence of Visa share sales gains and the impact of FX translation.

Operating expenses declined 6%, reflecting the benefits from re-engineering efforts and the impact of FX translation.

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims decreased 3%, mainly due to impact of lower credit reserve build, offset by an increase in net credit losses and the impact of FX translation. Rising credit losses were particularly apparent in the portfolios in India and Korea. Compared to the second quarter of 2009, delinquencies improved and net credit losses flattened as this region showed possible early signs of economic recovery and increased levels of customer activity.

3Q09 YTD vs. 3Q08 YTD

Revenues, net of interest expense, declined 15% driven by absence of Visa assets sales gains, a 34% decline in investment sales, lower loan and deposit volumes, and the impact of FX translation. Net interest revenue was 8% lower than the prior-year period reflecting lower Average loans and deposits. Non-interest revenue declined 28%, primarily due to the absence of Visa asset sales gains and the decline in investment sales.

Operating expenses declined 14%, reflecting the benefits from re-engineering efforts and the impact of FX translation.

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased 39% mainly due to higher net credit losses in India and Korea and a higher credit reserve build.


Table of Contents


INSTITUTIONAL CLIENTS GROUP (ICG)

 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Commissions and Fees

 $565 $754  (25)%$1,500 $2,269  (34)%

Administration and Other Fiduciary Fees

  1,258  1,397  (10) 3,717  4,148  (10)

Investment banking

  1,063  740  44  3,245  3,005  8 

Principal transactions

  (535) 3,116  NM  7,699  8,065  (5)

Other

  556  (188) NM  1,783  (107) NM 
              
 

Total non-interest revenue

 $2,907 $5,819  (50)%$17,944 $17,380  3%
 

Net interest revenue (including dividends)

  4,443  4,092  9  13,559  12,551  8 
              

Total revenues, net of interest expenses

 $7,350 $9,911  (26)%$31,503 $29,931  5%

Total operating expenses

  4,634�� 4,919  (6) 12,883  16,169  (20)
 

Net credit losses

  292  221  32  537  595  (10)
 

Provisions for unfunded lending commitments

    (80) 100  115  (155) NM 
 

Credit reserve build (release)

  146  285  (49) 995  500  99 
              

Provision for credit losses

 $438 $426  3%$1,647 $940  75%
              

Income from continuing operations before taxes

 $2,278 $4,566  (50)%$16,973 $12,822  32%

Income taxes (benefits)

  584  1,410  (59) 5,340  3,907  37 
              

Income from continuing operations

 $1,694 $3,156  (46)%$11,633 $8,915  30%

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  23  11  NM  23  40  (43)
              

Net income

 $1,671 $3,145  (47)%$11,610 $8,875  31%
              

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $831 $953  (13)%$833 $1,062  (22)%

Return on assets

  0.80% 1.31%    1.86% 1.12%   
              

Revenue by region:

                   
 

North America

 $1,955 $4,558  (57)%$10,342 $12,674  (18)%
 

EMEA

  3,043  2,348  30  11,523  7,882  46 
 

Latin America

  1,040  847  23  3,567  2,964  20 
 

Asia

  1,312  2,158  (39) 6,071  6,411  (5)
              
  

Total

 $7,350 $9,911  (26)%$31,503 $29,931  5%
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations by region:

                   
 

North America

 $75 $1,434  (95)%$2,964 $3,611  (18)%
 

EMEA

  856  450  90  4,450  1,599  NM 
 

Latin America

  364  386  (6) 1,595  1,304  22 
 

Asia

  399  886  (55) 2,624  2,401  9 
              
  

Total

 $1,694 $3,156  (46)%$11,633 $8,915  30%
              

Average loans by region(in billions):

                   
 

North America

 $43 $52  (17)%         
 

EMEA

  42  49  (14)         
 

Latin America

  21  24  (13)         
 

Asia

  27  36  (25)         
              
  

Total

 $133 $161  (17)%         
              

NM    Not meaningful


Table of Contents


SECURITIES AND BANKING

 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Net interest revenue

 $3,050 $2,670  14%$9,305 $8,520  9%

Non-interest revenue

  1,843  4,675  (61) 14,884  13,949  7 
              

Revenues, net of interest expense

 $4,893 $7,345  (33)%$24,189 $22,469  8%

Operating expenses

  3,493  3,667  (5) 9,580  12,322  (22)
 

Net credit losses

  294  223  32  539  593  (9)
 

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

    (74) 100  115  (149) NM 
 

Credit reserve build (release)

  151  288  (48) 994  494  NM 
              

Provision for credit losses

 $445 $437  2%$1,648 $938  76%
              

Income before taxes and noncontrolling interest

 $955 $3,241  (71)%$12,961 $9,209  41%

Income taxes

  200  1,003  (80) 4,145  2,812  47 

Income from continuing operations

  755  2,238  (66) 8,816  6,397  38 

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

  18  2  NM  19  14  36 
              

Net income

 $737 $2,236  (67)%$8,797 $6,383  38%
              

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $771 $883  (13)%$774 $990  (22)%

Return on assets

  0.38% 1.01%    1.52% 0.86%   
              

Revenues by region:

                   
 

North America

 $1,312 $4,018  (67)%$8,454 $11,117  (24)%
 

EMEA

  2,198  1,395  58  8,974  5,098  76 
 

Latin America

  703  469  50  2,547  1,872  36 
 

Asia

  680  1,463  (54) 4,214  4,382  (4)
              

Total revenues

 $4,893 $7,345  (33)%$24,189 $22,469  8%
              

Net income (loss) from continuing operations by region:

                   
 

North America

 $(77)$1,340  NM $2,493 $3,368  (26)%
 

EMEA

  548  102  NM  3,466  674  NM 
 

Latin America

  216  227  (5)% 1,137  853  33 
 

Asia

  68  569  (88) 1,720  1,502  15 
              

Total net income from continuing operations

 $755 $2,238  (66)%$8,816 $6,397  38%
              

Securities and Banking

                   
 

Revenue details:

                   
 

Net Investment Banking

 $1,163 $618  88%$3,305 $2,783  19%
 

Lending

  (699) 1,262  NM  (1,956) 2,026  NM 
 

Equity markets

  446  550  (19) 3,151  3,237  (3)
 

Fixed income markets

  3,945  4,756  (17) 19,739  13,927  42 
 

Private bank

  520  563  (8) 1,496  1,789  (16)
 

Other Securities and Banking

  (482) (404) (19) (1,546) (1,293) (20)
              

Total Securities and Banking Revenues

 $4,893 $7,345  (33)%$24,189 $22,469  8%
              

NM    Not meaningful

3Q09 vs. 3Q08

Revenues, net of interest expense, decreased 33% or $2.5 billion to $4.9 billion mainly from revenue marks of negative $1.4 billion, set forth in greater detail below, and a decrease in lending revenues of $2.0 billion to negative $699 million (mainly from losses on credit derivative positions). Fixed income markets revenues declined $811 million to $3.9 billion due to negative credit value adjustments of $760 million (mainly due to narrowing in Citigroup spreads, partially offset by the narrowing of counterparty spreads), compared to positive credit value adjustments of $2.6 billion in the third quarter of 2008, partially offset by stronger performances across most fixed income categories as market conditions improved. Equity markets revenues declined $104 million or 19% primarily driven by negative credit value adjustments of $878 million, offset by stronger results in proprietary trading and derivatives. Investment banking revenues increased $545 million, led by stronger high yield and investment grade debt issuances in debt underwriting, and stronger volumes in equity underwriting, with a decline in advisory revenues resulting from lower global M&A activity.

Operating expenses decreased 5% or $174 million to $3.5 billion, mainly driven by lower severance and the benefit of FX translation, offset partially by an increase in compensation costs.

Provisions for credit losses increased by 2% or $8 million to $445 million, mainly from higher net credit losses and a release of provisions for unfunded lending commitments in the prior-year period, offset partially by lower credit reserve builds.

3Q09 YTD vs. 3Q08 YTD

Revenues, net of interest expense, increased 8% or $1.7 billion, mainly due to an increase in fixed income markets of $5.8 billion to $19.7 billion reflecting strong trading results, particularly in the first and second quarters of 2009, offset partially by a decrease in lending revenues of $4.0 billion to


Table of Contents

negative $2.0 billion (mainly from losses on credit default swap hedges).

Operating expenses decreased 22% or $2.7 billion driven by lower compensation due to headcount reductions and benefits from re-engineering and expense management.

Provisions for credit losses increased 76% or $710 million to $1.6 billion mainly from increased credit reserve builds on funded loans and higher provisions for unfunded lending commitments.

Third Quarter Revenue Impacting Citicorp—Securities and Banking Significant Revenue Items

        While not as significant as in prior quarters, certain items continued to impact Securities and Risk ExposureBanking revenues during the third quarter of 2009. These items are set forth in the table below.

 
 Pretax Revenue
Marks
(in millions)
 Risk Exposure
(in billions)
 
 
 Second Quarter 2009 Second Quarter 2008 June 30,
2009
 Mar. 31,
2009
 %
Change
 

Private Equity and equity investments

 $11 $(6) 1.8 $1.7  6%

Alt-A Mortgages(1)

  99  (48) 1.2  0.9  33 

Commercial Real Estate (CRE) positions(1)

  (32) (65) 7.0  6.2  13 

CVA on Citi debt liabilities under fair value option

  (1,452) (228) N/A  N/A   

CVA on derivatives positions, excluding monoline insurers

  597  48  N/A  N/A   
            

Total significant revenue items

 $(777)$(299)         
            

 
 Pretax Revenue
(in millions)
 
 
 Third
Quarter
2009
 Third
Quarter
2008
 

Private Equity and equity investments

 $79 $(50)

Alt-A Mortgages(1)(2)

  142  (221)

Commercial Real Estate (CRE) positions(1)(3)

  20  130 

CVA on Citi debt liabilities under fair value option

  (955) 1,526 

CVA on derivatives positions, excluding monoline insurers

  (722) 1,178 
      

Total significant revenue items

 $(1,436)$2,563 
      

(1)
Net of hedges.

Private Equity and Equity Investments

        In the second quarter of 2009, Citicorp recognized pretax gains of approximately $11 million on private equity and equity investments. Citicorp had $1.8 billion in private equity and equity investments securities at June 30, 2009, which increased approximately $85 million from March 31, 2009.

Alt-A Mortgage Securities

        In the second quarter of 2009, Citigroup recorded pretax gains of approximately $99 million, net of hedges, on Alt-A mortgage securities held in Citicorp.

(2)
For these purposes, Alt-A mortgage securities are non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) where (i) the underlying collateral has weighted average FICO scores between 680 and 720 or (ii) for instances where FICO scores are greater than 720, RMBS have 30% or less of the underlying collateral composed of full documentation loans.

        Citicorp had $1.2 billion in Alt-A mortgage securities at June 30, 2009, which increased $0.3 billion from March 31, 2009. Of the $1.2 billion, approximately $0.7 billion was classified asTrading account assets See "Loan and $0.5 billion was classified as available-for-sale investments.

Commercial Real Estate

        Citicorp'sCredit Details—U.S. Consumer Mortgage Lending."

(3)
Securities and Banking's commercial real estate (CRE) exposure is split into three categories: assetscategories of assets: held at fair value; held to maturity/held for investment; and equity. DuringSee "Exposure to Commercial Real Estate" below for a further discussion.

Credit Valuation Adjustment on Citi's Debt Liabilities for Which Citi Has Elected the secondFair Value Option

        The Company is required to use its own credit spreads in determining the current value of its derivative liabilities and all other liabilities for which it has elected the fair value option. When Citi's credit spreads widen (deteriorate), Citi recognizes a gain on these liabilities because the value of the liabilities has decreased. When Citi's credit spreads narrow (improve), Citi recognizes a loss on these liabilities because the value of the liabilities has increased. The approximately $955 million of losses recorded by Securities and Banking on its fair value option liabilities (excluding derivative liabilities) during the third quarter of 2009 was principally due to the narrowing (improving) of the Company's credit spreads.

Credit Valuation Adjustment on Derivative Positions, excluding Monoline insurers

        The approximately $722 million of pretax losses recorded by Securities and Banking on its derivative positions during the third quarter of $322009 was due to the narrowing of the Company's credit default swap spreads on its derivative liabilities. These losses were partially offset by gains due to the narrowing of the credit spreads of the Company's counterparties on its derivative assets. See "Derivatives—Fair Valuation Adjustments for Derivatives" below for a further discussion.


Table of Contents


TRANSACTION SERVICES

 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Net interest revenue

 $1,393 $1,422  (2)%$4,254 $4,031  6%

Non-interest revenue

  1,064  1,144  (7) 3,060  3,431  (11)
              

Revenues, net of interest expense

 $2,457 $2,566  (4)%$7,314 $7,462  (2)%

Operating expenses

  1,141  1,252  (9) 3,303  3,847  (14)

Provision for credit losses and for benefits and claims

  (7) (11) 36  (1) 2  NM 
              

Income before taxes and noncontrolling interest

 $1,323 $1,325   $4,012 $3,613  11%

Income taxes

  384  407  (6)% 1,195  1,095  9 

Income from continuing operations

  939  918  2  2,817  2,518  12 

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  5  9  (44) 4  26  (85)
              

Net income

 $934 $909  3%$2,813 $2,492  13%
              

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $60 $70  (14)%$59 $72  (18)%

Return on assets

  6.18% 5.17%    6.37% 4.62%   
              

Revenues by region:

                   
 

North America

 $643 $540  19%$1,888 $1,557  21%
 

EMEA

  845  953  (11) 2,549  2,784  (8)
 

Latin America

  337  378  (11) 1,020  1,092  (7)
 

Asia

  632  695  (9) 1,857  2,029  (8)
              

Total revenues

 $2,457 $2,566   $7,314 $7,462  (2)%
              

Net income (loss) from continuing operations by region:

                   
 

North America

 $152 $94  62%$471 $243  94%
 

EMEA

  308  348  (11) 984  925  6 
 

Latin America

  148  159  (7) 458  451  2 
 

Asia

  331  317  4  904  899  1 
              

Total net income from continuing operations

 $939 $918  2%$2,817 $2,518  12%
              

Key Indicators(in billions of dollars)

                   

Average deposits and other customer liability balances

 $314 $273  15%         

EOP assets under custody(in trillions of dollars)

 $11.8 $11.9  (1)         
              

NM    Not meaningful

3Q09 vs. 3Q08

Revenues, net of interest expense, were $2.5 billion, down $109 million or 4% from strong prior-year performance due to spread compression (as global rates declined) and lower volumes as well as negative foreign exchange impact. This was partly offset by strong growth in liability balances and higher trade fees.

Operating expenses declined 9% or $111 million to $1.1 billion, driven by headcount reductions, re-engineering efforts, expense management initiatives and a benefit from FX translation.

3Q09 YTD vs. 3Q08 YTD

Revenues, net of interest expense, of $7.3 billion decreased slightly from the prior period driven primarily by the impact of lower fee revenues and negative foreign exchange. Average liability balances grew 6% driven by strong growth in North America as a result of successful implementation of deposit growth strategy.

Operating expenses declined 14%, driven by headcount reduction and re-engineering benefits.


Table of Contents


CITI HOLDINGS

 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 
 

Net interest revenue

 $4,024 $5,766  (30)%$13,902 $17,292  (20)%
 

Non-interest revenue

  2,670  (5,062) NM  11,994  (19,027) NM 
              

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $6,694 $704  NM $25,896 $(1,735) NM 
              

Provision for credit losses and for benefits and claims

                   
 

Net credit losses

 $6,250 $3,603  73%$19,090 $9,332  NM 
 

Credit reserve build (release)

  338  3,224  (90) 4,743  6,790  (30)%
              
 

Provision for loan losses

 $6,588 $6,827  (4)%$23,833 $16,122  48%
 

Provision for benefits & claims

  310  273  14  923  805  15 
 

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

    (70) 100  80  (138) NM 
              
 

Total provision for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 $6,898 $7,030  (2)%$24,836 $16,789  48%
              

Total operating expenses

 $3,202 $5,136  (38)%$11,417 $16,406  (30)%
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes

 $(3,406)$(11,462) 70%$(10,357)$(34,930) 70%

Provision (benefits) for income taxes

  (1,588) (4,526) 65  (4,562) (13,619) 67 
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $(1,818)$(6,936) 74%$(5,795)$(21,311) 73%

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  49  (109) NM  (1) (87) 99 
              

Citi Holding's net income (loss)

 $(1,867)$(6,827) 73%$(5,794)$(21,224) 73%
              

Balance Sheet Data (in billions)

                   

Total EOP assets

 $617 $775  (20)%         

Total EOP deposits

  90  83  8          
              

NM    Not meaningful


Table of Contents


BROKERAGE AND ASSET MANAGEMENT

 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Net interest revenue

 $(56)$318  NM $460 $727  (37)%

Non-interest revenue

  726  1,776  (59)% 14,250  6,224  NM 
              

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $670 $2,094  (68)%$14,710 $6,951  NM 
              

Total operating expenses

 $358 $2,085  (83)%$3,000 $6,537  (54)%
              
  

Net credit losses

   $1  (100)%$3 $11  (73)%
  

Credit reserve build (release)

 $(11) (3) NM  35  7  NM 
  

Provision for benefits and claims

  38  58  (34) 113  155  (27)
              

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

 $27 $56  (52)%$151 $173  (13)%
              

Income from continuing operations before taxes

 $285 $(47) NM $11,559 $241  NM 

Income taxes

  146  10  NM  4,548  145  NM 
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $139 $(57) NM $7,011 $96  NM 

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  16  (98) NM  5  (60) NM 
              

Net income

 $123 $41  NM $7,006 $156  NM 
              

EOP assets(in billions of dollars)

 $59 $62  (5)%         

EOP deposits (in billions of dollars)

  60 $53  13          
              

NM    Not meaningful

3Q09 vs. 3Q08

Revenues, net of interest expense, decreased 68% primarily driven by the decrease in the Company's share of Smith Barney revenue resulting from the joint venture transaction. Revenues in the prior-year period included a $347 million pre-tax gain on sale of CitiStreet and charges related to settlement of auction rate securities (ARS) of $306 million pre-tax. 2009 third quarter revenue includes a $320 million pre-tax gain on the sale of the Managed Futures business to the Morgan Stanley Smith Barney joint venture.

Operating expenses decreased 83% from the prior-year period, mainly driven by the absence of Smith Barney expenses and the absence of restructuring expenses in retail alternative investments.

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims decreased by 52% mainly reflecting lower provisions for benefits and claims.

End of Period Assets include approximately $24 billion of assets of discontinued operations held for sale.

3Q09 YTD vs. 3Q08 YTD

Revenues, net of interest expense, increased $7.8 billion due to an $11.1 billion pre-tax gain on sale ($6.7 billion after-tax) on the Morgan Stanley Smith Barney joint venture transaction, which closed on June 1, 2009. Excluding the gain, revenues declined $3.3 billion driven by the absence of Smith Barney revenues as well as the impact of market conditions on Smith Barney transactional and fee-based revenue compared to the prior year.

Operating expenses decreased $3.5 billion primarily driven by the absence of Smith Barney expenses, lower variable compensation and re-engineering efforts, particularly in retail alternative investments.

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims declined 13% mainly reflecting lower provisions for benefits and claims.


Table of Contents


LOCAL CONSUMER LENDING

 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Net interest revenue

 $3,453 $4,612  (25)%$10,730 $14,015  (23)%

Non-interest revenue

  1,194  820  46  4,300  5,141  (16)
              

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $4,647 $5,432  (14)%$15,030 $19,156  (22)%
              

Total operating expenses

 $2,611 $2,847  (8)%$7,746 $9,094  (15)%
              
 

Net credit losses

 $4,929 $3,487  41%$14,617 $9,116  60%
 

Credit reserve build (release)

  604  2,702  (78) 5,003  5,858  (15)
 

Provision for benefits and claims

  272  215  27  810  650  25 
              

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

 $5,805 $6,404  (9)%$20,430 $15,624  31%
              

Loss from continuing operations before taxes

 $(3,769)$(3,819) 1%$(13,146)$(5,562) NM 

Income taxes (benefits)

  (1,670) (1,534) (9) (5,435) (2,196) NM 
              

Loss from continuing operations

 $(2,099)$(2,285) 8%$(7,711)$(3,366) NM 

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

  13  1  NM  23  13  77%
              

Net loss

 $(2,112)$(2,286) 8%$(7,734)$(3,379) NM 
              

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $384 $456  (16)%$397 $471  (16)%

Net credit losses as a % of average loans

  6.11% 3.83%            
              

NM    Not meaningful

3Q09 vs. 3Q08

Revenues, net of interest expense, decreased 14% due to lower net interest margin, partially offset by increased Cards securitization revenues of $0.7 billion.Net interest revenue was 25% lower than the prior year due to lower balances and the impact of delinquencies and loan modifications in Real Estate, North America Consumer Finance, and Cards. Net interest revenue as a percent of average loans decreased 98 basis points from the prior-year quarter in North America (ex Cards) and decreased 99 basis points in International, due principally to volume decreases. Average loans decreased 12%, with North America (ex Cards) down 10%, North America Cards down 19%, and International down 19%.Non-interest revenue increased 46% reflecting the increased revenue from Cards securitization.

Operating expenses declined 8% primarily due to lower volumes and reductions from expense re-engineering actions, partially offset by higher real estate owned (OREO) and collection costs.

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims decreased 9% from the prior period reflecting lower reserve builds of $2.1 billion, partially offset by increased net credit losses of $1.4 billion, primarily in Real Estate and EMEA. The credit reserve build for the quarter included $350 million related to the UK Cards portfolio which was transferred to held-for-sale. The net credit loss ratio increased 228 basis points from the prior-year quarter with North America (ex Cards) up 184 basis points to 4.78%, International up 375 basis points to 9.77%, and North America Cards up 575 basis points to 14.58%.

3Q09 YTD vs. 3Q08 YTD

Revenues, net of interest expense, decreased 22% due to a decline in net interest revenue, higher net credit losses flowing through the securitization trusts in North America and a higher FDIC assessment.Net interest revenue was 23% lower than the prior year driven by lower balances (due to run-off and credit tightening) and spread compression due largely to higher non-accrual loans, the higher FDIC assessment and the impact of loan modifications.Non-interest revenue declined 16% primarily due to higher credit costs flowing through the securitization trusts in North America and lower securitization gains. Year-to-date non-interest revenue for 2009 also included a $1.1 billion pretax gain on the sale of the Company's remaining stake in Redecard as compared to a prior-year period pre-tax gain on sale of Redecard of $663 million.

Operating expenses decreased 15% primarily due to re-engineering actions, lower volumes and marketing expenses and the absence of prior-year repositioning charges. The declines in expenses were partially offset by higher OREO and collections costs.

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased 31% reflecting higher net credit losses of $5.5 billion, partially offset by decreased reserve builds of $855 million.


Table of Contents

        The following table provides additional information, as of September 30, 2009, regarding the Local Consumer Lending loan details. For additional information on loans within Local Consumer Lending, see "Loan and Credit Details—Consumer Loan Details" below.

Composition of Loans within
Local Consumer Lending
 Carrying Value of Assets September 30, 2009 
in billions of dollars September 30,
2009
 June 30,
2009
 % of Assets under U.S.
Government Loss-
Sharing Agreement(1)
 Net credit
loss ratio
 90+ Days
Past Due %
 

North America

                
 

First mortgages

 $123.3 $126.9  66% 3.46% 10.12%
 

Second mortgages

  56.9  59.4  87  7.70  3.01 
 

Student

  26.5  26.6    0.39  3.25 
 

Cards (Retail Partners)

  21.7  22.8  4  14.58  4.08 
 

Personal and Other

  19.3  20.1  10  10.17  3.32 
 

Auto

  15.0  16.2  72  6.61  1.83 
 

Commercial Real Estate

  10.8  11.1  88  2.42  2.38 
            

Total North America

 $273.5 $283.1  56%. 5.61% 6.26%
            

International

                
 

EMEA

 $26.1 $28.6    7.69% 4.52%
 

Asia

  10.9  11.4    14.71  2.40 
 

Latin America

  0.3  0.3    19.14  1.74 
            

Total International

 $37.3 $40.3    9.77% 3.88%
            

Total

 $310.8 $323.4  49% 6.11% 5.97%
            

(1)
See "Government Programs—U.S. Government Loss-Sharing Agreement" below for a description of the agreement.

Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding.


Table of Contents


SPECIAL ASSET POOL

 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
In millions of dollars
 2009 2008 % Change 2009 2008 % Change 

Net interest revenue

 $627 $836  (25)%$2,712 $2,550  6%

Non-interest revenue

  750  (7,658) NM  (6,556) (30,392) 78 
              

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $1,377 $(6,822) NM $(3,844)$(27,842) 86%
              

Total operating expenses

 $233 $204  14%$671 $775  (13)%
              
 

Net credit losses

 $1,321 $115  NM $4,470 $205  NM 
 

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

    (70) 100% 80  (138) NM 
 

Credit reserve builds (release)

  (255) 525  NM  (295) 925  NM 
              

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 $1,066 $570  87%$4,255 $992  NM 
              

Income (Loss) from continuing operations before taxes

 $78 $(7,596) NM $(8,770)$(29,609) 70%

Income taxes (benefits)

  (64) (3,002) 98% (3,675) (11,568) 68 
              

Income (Loss) from continuing operations

 $142 $(4,594) NM $(5,095)$(18,041) 72%

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  20  (12) NM  29  (40) 28 
              

Net Income (loss)

 $122 $(4,582) NM $(5,066)$(18,001) 72%
              

EOP assets(in billions of dollars)

 $182 $261  (31)%         
              

NM
Not meaningful

3Q09 vs. 3Q08

Revenues, net of interest expense, increased $8.2 billion primarily due to favorable net revenue marks relative to the prior-year quarter, which are described in more detail below. Revenue in the current quarter included positive marks of $2.0 billion on subprime-related direct exposures and non-credit accretion of $502 million, partially offset by write-downs on CRE of $586 million and $506 million of other write-downs and losses.

Operating expenses increased 14% driven by the USG loss-sharing agreement (see "Government Programs—U.S. Government Loss-Sharing Agreement" below), partially offset by lower compensation expenses.

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims increased $496 million primarily driven by $1.2 billion in increased net credit losses, partially offset by a lower provision of $780 million.

3Q09 YTD vs. 3Q08 YTD

Revenues, net of interest expense, increased $24.0 billion primarily due to favorable net revenue marks relative to the prior year. Revenue year-to-date included a $1.2 billion positive CVA on derivative positions, excluding monoline insurers, and positive marks of $284 million on subprime-related direct exposures, offset by negative revenue of $1.1 billion on Alt-A mortgages. Revenue year-to-date was also negatively impacted by $3.4 billion related to CVA on fair value option liabilities and monolines, CRE, and negative marks for private equity positions.

Operating expenses decreased 13% mainly driven by lower volumes and lower transaction expenses.

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims increased $3.3 billion primarily driven by the $4.3 billion increase in write-offs over the prior period. Significant write-offs included exposures in Lyondell Basell. The net $295 million net credit reserve release in the current period was driven by a $2.1 billion release for specific counterparties (including Lyondell Basell), partially offset by builds for specific counterparties.

Assets declined 30% versus the prior year primarily driven by amortization/prepayments, sales, and marks/charge-offs.


Table of Contents

        The following table provides details of the composition of the Special Asset Pool assets as of September 30, 2009.

Assets within Special Asset Pool

 
 Carrying Value of Assets September 30, 2009 
in billions of dollars
 September 30,
2009
 June 30,
2009
 % of Assets under U.S.
Government Loss-Sharing
Program(1)
 Face Value Carrying value
as % of Face
Value
 

Securities in AFS/HTM(2)

                
 

Corporates

 $14.8 $17.1  4%$15.1  98%
 

Prime and Non-U.S. MBS

  16.0  16.2  33  20.2  80 
 

Auction Rate Securities

  8.0  8.3  15  10.8  74 
 

Alt-A mortgages

  9.0  9.5  99  17.5  52 
 

Government Agencies

  0.7  6.2    0.8  97 
 

Other Securities(3)

  6.3  7.4  35  8.7  73 
            

Total Securities in AFS/HTM

 $54.8 $64.7  33%$72.9  75%
            

Loan, leases & LC in HFI/HFS(4)

                
 

Corporates

 $26.4 $28.2  33%$28.4  93%
 

Commercial Real Estate (CRE)

  15.3  15.8  65  16.7  92 
 

Other

  3.7  4.7    4.3  85 
 

Loan Loss Reserves

  (4.0) (4.1) NM  NM  NM 
            

Total Loan, leases & LC in HFI/HFS

 $41.4 $44.6  NM  NM  NM 
            

Mark to Market

                
 

Subprime securities(5)

 $8.0 $8.0   $20.9  38%
 

Other Securities(6)

  6.9  8.4  8% 29.5  24 
 

Derivatives

  9.4  10.8    NM  NM 
 

Loans, Leases and Letters of Credit

  7.3  7.8  28  11.5  63 
 

Repurchase agreements

  6.9  7.3    NM  NM 
            

Total Mark to Market

 $38.5 $42.1  9% NM  NM 
            

Highly Lev. Fin. Commitments

 $3.5 $4.6  5%$6.1  57%

Equities (excludes ARS in AFS)

  12.9  13.8    NM  NM 

SIVs

  16.2  16.2  36  21.0  77 

Monolines

  1.3  1.7    NM  NM 

Consumer and Other(7)

  13.3  13.2  NM  NM  NM 
            

Total

 $181.9 $201.0          
            

(1)
See "Government Programs—U.S. Government Loss-Sharing Agreement" below.

(2)
AFS accounts for approximately one-third of the total.

(3)
Includes CRE ($2.2 billion), Municipals ($1.5 billion) and ABS ($1.6 billion).

(4)
HFS accounts for approximately $1.1 billion of the total.

(5)
These $8.0 billion of assets are reflected in the exposures set forth under "U.S. Subprime-Related Direct Exposure in Citi Holdings—Special Asset Pool" below.

(6)
Includes $3.2 billion of Corporates and $0.7 billion of CRE.

(7)
Includes $4.8 billion of Small Business Banking & Finance loans.

Table of Contents

Items Impacting Special Asset Pool Revenues

        The table below provides additional information regarding the favorable net revenue marks affecting the Special Asset Pool during the third quarter of 2009.

 
 Pretax Revenue
(in millions)
 
 
 Third
Quarter
2009
 Third
Quarter
2008
 

Sub-prime related direct exposures(1)(2)

 $1,967 $(394)

Private Equity and equity investments

  (20) (430)

Alt-A Mortgages(1)(3)

  (196) (932)

Highly leveraged loans and financing commitments(4)

  (24) (792)

Commercial Real Estate (CRE) positions(1)(5)

  (594) (649)

Structured Investment Vehicles' (SIVs) Assets

  (40) (2,004)

Auction Rate Securities (ARS) proprietary positions

    (166)

CVA related to exposure to monoline insurers

  (61) (920)

CVA on Citi debt liabilities under fair value option

  (64)  

CVA on derivatives positions, excluding monoline insurers

  43  (64)
      

Subtotal

 $1,011 $(6,351)

Accretion on reclassified assets

  502   
      

Total significant revenue items

 $1,513 $(6,351)
      

(1)
Net of hedges.

(2)
See "U.S. Subprime-Related Direct Exposures in Citi Holdings—Special Asset Pool" below for a further discussion of the related risk exposures and the associated marks recorded.

(3)
For these purposes, Alt-A mortgage securities are non-agency RMBS where (i) the underlying collateral has weighted average FICO scores between 680 and 720 or (ii) for instances where FICO scores are greater than 720, RMBS have 30% or less of the underlying collateral composed of full documentation loans. See "Loan and Credit Details—U.S. Consumer Mortgage Lending".

(4)
Net of underwriting fees. See "Highly Leveraged Financing Transactions" below for a further discussion.

(5)
The aggregate $594 million is comprised primarily of $497 million, net of hedges, were booked on exposures recorded at fair value. Citicorp had $7.0 billion invalue and $104 million of losses on equity method investments. Citi Holdings' CRE positionsexposure is split into three categories of assets: held at June 30, 2009, which increased $0.8 billion from March 31, 2009.fair value; held to maturity/held for investment; and equity. See "Exposure to Commercial Real Estate" below for a further discussion.

Credit Valuation Adjustment Related to Monoline Insurers

        CVA is calculated by applying forward default probabilities, which are derived using the counterparty's current credit spread, to the expected exposure profile. The exposure primarily relates to hedges on super senior subprime exposures that were executed with various monoline insurance companies. See "Direct Exposure to Monolines" below for a further discussion.

Credit Valuation Adjustment on Citi's Debt Liabilities for Which Citi Has Elected the Fair Value Option

        Under SFAS 157 (ASC 820-10-35-18), theThe Company is required to use its own credit spreads in determining the current value for its derivative liabilities and all other liabilities for which it has elected the fair value option. When Citi's credit spreads widen (deteriorate), Citi recognizes a gain on these liabilities because the value of the liabilities has decreased. When Citi's credit spreads narrow (improve), Citi recognizes a loss on these liabilities because the value of the liabilities has increased.

        During the second quarter The approximately $64 million of 2009, Citicorplosses recorded losses of approximately $1,452 millionby Citi Holdings on its fair value option liabilities (excluding derivative liabilities) during the third quarter of 2009 was principally due to the narrowing (improving) of the Company's credit spreads.

Credit Valuation Adjustment on Derivative Positions, excluding Monoline insurers

        DuringThe approximately $43 million net gain on Citi Holdings' derivative positions during the secondthird quarter of 2009 Citicorp recorded pretax net gain of approximately $597 million on its derivative positionswas due to the narrowing of the credit default swap spreads of the Company's counterparties on its derivative assets. A majority of the gains were offset by losses due to narrowing in the Company's own credit spreads on the Company's derivative liabilities. See "Derivatives" below for a further discussion.

        See, generally, "Managing Global Risk" below for additional information on the risk exposures discussed above.


Table of Contents

ITEMS IMPACTING CITI HOLDINGS

Citi Holdings Significant Revenue Items and Risk Exposure Predominantly in Special Asset Pool

 
 Pretax Revenue
(in millions)
 Risk Exposure
(in billions)
 
 
 Second Quarter 2009 Second Quarter 2008 June 30,
2009
 Mar. 31,
2009
 %
Change
 

Sub-prime related direct exposures

 $613 $(3,395)$9.6 $10.2  (6)%

Private Equity and equity investments

  (37) 183  6.2  6.0  3 

Alt-A Mortgages(1)

  (390) (277) 10.0  11.6  (14)

Highly leveraged loans and financing commitments(2)

  (237) (428) 8.5  9.5  (11)

Commercial Real Estate (CRE) positions(1)(3)

  (354) (480) 28.6  29.9  (4)

Structured Investment Vehicles' (SIVs) Assets

  50  11  16.2  16.2   

Auction Rate Securities (ARS) proprietary positions

    197  8.3  8.5  (2)

CVA related to exposure to monoline insurers

  157  (2,428) N/A  N/A   

CVA on Citi debt liabilities under fair value option

  (156)   N/A  N/A   

CVA on derivatives positions, excluding monoline insurers

  804  52  N/A  N/A   
            

Subtotal

 $450 $(6,565)         

Accretion on reclassified assets

  501            
            

Total significant revenue items

 $951 $(6,565)         
            

(1)
Net of hedges.

(2)
Net of underwriting fees.

(3)
Excludes CRE positions that are included in the SIV portfolio.

Subprime-Related Direct Exposures

        In the second quarter of 2009, Citi Holdings recorded gains of approximately $613 million, net of hedges, on its subprime-related direct exposures. The Company's remaining $9.6 billion in U.S. subprime net direct exposure in Citi Holdings at June 30, 2009 consisted of (i) approximately $8.3 billion of net exposures to the super senior tranches of CDOs, which are collateralized by asset-backed securities, derivatives on asset-backed securities or both, and (ii) approximately $1.4 billion of subprime-related exposures in its lending and structuring business. See "U.S. Subprime-Related Direct Exposures" below for a further discussion of such exposures and the associated marks recorded.

Private Equity and Equity Investments

        In the second quarter of 2009, Citi Holdings recognized pretax losses of approximately $37 million on private equity and equity investments. Citi Holdings had $6.2 billion in private equity and equity investments securities at June 30, 2009, which increased approximately $150 million from March 31, 2009.

Alt-A Mortgage Securities

        In the second quarter of 2009, Citigroup recorded pretax losses of approximately $390 million, net of hedges, on Alt-A mortgage securities held in Citi Holdings. For these purposes, Alt-A mortgage securities are non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) where (i) the underlying collateral has weighted average FICO scores between 680 and 720 or (ii) for instances where FICO scores are greater than 720, RMBS have 30% or less of the underlying collateral composed of full documentation loans.

        Citi Holdings had $10.0 billion in Alt-A mortgage securities at June 30 2009, which decreased $1.6 billion from March 31, 2009. Of the $10.0 billion, approximately $0.4 billion was classified asTrading account assets, on which $29 million of fair value losses, net of hedging, was recorded in earnings, $0.1 billion was classified as available-for-sale (AFS) investments, and $9.5 billion was classified as held-to-maturity (HTM) investments. HTM securities decreased $1.1 billion from March 31, 2009, due to principal pay-downs and impairments recognized during the quarter.

Highly Leveraged Loans and Financing Commitments

        The Company recorded pretax losses of approximately $237 million on funded and unfunded highly leveraged finance exposures in the second quarter of 2009. Citigroup's exposure to highly leveraged financings totaled $8.5 billion at June 30, 2009 (approximately $8.1 billion in funded and $0.4 billion in unfunded commitments), reflecting a decrease of approximately $1.0 billion from March 31, 2009. See "Highly Leveraged Financing Transactions" below for a further discussion.

Commercial Real Estate

        Citi Holdings' commercial real estate (CRE) exposure is split into three categories: assets held at fair value; held to maturity/held for investment; and equity. During the second quarter of 2009, pretax losses of $213 million, net of hedges, were booked on exposures recorded at fair value, $135 million of losses were booked on equity method investments, and $6 million of impairments were booked on HTM positions. Citi Holdings had $28.6 billion in CRE positions at June 30, 2009, which decreased $1.3 billion from March 31, 2009. See "Exposure to Commercial Real Estate" below for a further discussion.

Monoline Insurers Credit Valuation Adjustment

        During the second quarter of 2009, Citi Holdings recorded a pretax gain on credit value adjustments (CVA) of approximately $157 million on its exposure to monoline insurers. CVA is calculated by applying forward default


Table of Contents

probabilities, which are derived using the counterparty's current credit spread, to the expected exposure profile. The exposure primarily relates to hedges on super senior subprime exposures that were executed with various monoline insurance companies. See "Direct Exposure to Monolines" below for a further discussion.

Credit Valuation Adjustment on Citi's Debt Liabilities for Which Citi Has Elected the Fair Value Option

        Under SFAS 157 (ASC 820-10-35-18), the Company is required to use its own credit spreads in determining the current value for its derivative liabilities and all other liabilities for which it has elected the fair value option. When Citi's credit spreads widen (deteriorate), Citi recognizes a gain on these liabilities because the value of the liabilities has decreased. When Citi's credit spreads narrow (improve), Citi recognizes a loss on these liabilities because the value of the liabilities has increased.

        During the second quarter of 2009, Citi Holdings recorded a loss of approximately $156 million on its fair value option liabilities (excluding derivative liabilities) due to the narrowing of the Company's credit spreads.

Credit Valuation Adjustment on Derivative Positions, excluding Monoline insurers

        During the second quarter of 2009, Citi Holdings recorded a net gain of approximately $804 million on its derivative positions primarily due to the narrowing of the credit default swap spreads of the Company's counterparties on its derivative assets. See "Derivatives""Derivatives—Fair Valuation Adjustments for Derivatives" below for a further discussion.

Accretion on Reclassified Assets

        In the fourth quarter of 2008, the CompanyCiti Holdings reclassified $33.3 billion of debt securities from trading securities to HTM investments, $4.7 billion of debt securities from trading securities to AFS, and $15.7 billion of loans from held-for-sale to held-for-investment. All assets were reclassified with an amortized cost equal to the fair value on the date of reclassification. The difference between the amortized cost basis and the expected principal cash flows is treated as a purchase discount and accreted into income over the remaining life of the security or loan. InDuring the secondthird quarter of 2009, the CompanyCiti Holdings recognized approximately $501$502 million of interest revenue from this accretion.

        See, generally, "Managing Global Risk" below for additional information on the risk exposures discussed above.


Table of Contents

DIVESTITURES

Joint Venture with Morgan Stanley

        Pursuant to a previously disclosed agreement, on June 1, 2009, Citi and Morgan Stanley established a joint venture (JV) that combines the Global Wealth Management platform of Morgan Stanley with Citi's Smith Barney, Quilter and Australia private client networks. Citi sold 100% of these businesses to Morgan Stanley in exchange for a 49% stake in the JV and an upfront cash payment of $2.75 billion. The Brokerage and Asset Management business recorded a pretax gain of approximately $11.1 billion ($6.7 billion after-tax) on this sale. Both Morgan Stanley and Citi will access the JV for retail distribution and each firm's institutional businesses will continue to execute order flow from the JV.

        In addition, as previously disclosed, on August 1, 2009, Citi sold its managed futures business to the Morgan Stanley Smith Barney JV. This sale will result in an after-tax gain of approximately $160 million in the third quarter of 2009 and will not impact Citi's 49% ownership stake in the JV.

Sale of Nikko Cordial Securities

        On May 1, 2009, Citigroup entered into a definitive agreement to sell its Japanese domestic securities business, conducted principally through Nikko Cordial Securities Inc., to Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation in a transaction with a total cash value to Citi of approximately $7.9 billion (¥774.5 billion). Citi's ownership interests in Nikko Citigroup Limited, Nikko Asset Management Co., Ltd., and Nikko Principal Investments Japan Ltd. were not included in the transaction. Citi expects to recognize an immaterial after-tax gain on the transaction when the transaction closes. The transaction is expected to close by the end of the fourth quarter of 2009, subject to regulatory approvals and customary closing conditions. The results of Nikko Cordial are reflected as Discontinued Operations in the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

Sale of NikkoCiti Trust

        On July 1, 2009, Citigroup entered into a definitive agreement to sell all of the shares of NikkoCiti Trust and Banking Corporation (NCT) to Nomura Trust & Banking Co., Ltd. for an all cash consideration of $197 million, subject to certain closing purchase price adjustments. The sale is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2009, subject to regulatory approvals and customary closing conditions.

OTHER ITEMS

Income Taxes

        The Company's effective tax rate on continuing operations was 17.1% in the second quarter of 2009 versus 51.2% in the prior-year period. The current quarter includes a tax benefit of $129 million in continuing operations (plus $34 million in discontinued operations) relating to the conclusion of an audit of various issues in the Company's 2003-2005 U.S. federal tax audit. The Company expects to conclude the audit of its U.S. federal consolidated income tax returns for the years 2003-2005 within the next 12 months. The gross uncertain tax position at June 30, 2009 for the items expected to be resolved is approximately $85 million plus gross interest of approximately $8 million. The potential net tax benefit to continuing operations could be approximately $90 million. This is in addition to the $110 million and $163 million benefits booked in the first and second quarters of 2009, respectively, for issues already resolved.

        The Company's net deferred tax asset of $41.6 billion at June 30, 2009 decreased by approximately $2.9 billion from December 31, 2008. The principal items reducing the deferred tax asset were approximately $1.4 billion due to an increase in other comprehensive income and approximately $1.2 billion in compensation tax benefits under SFAS 123(R)(ASC 718-740) which reducedadditional paid-in capital in 2009. Although realization is not assured, the Company believes that the realization of the recognized net deferred tax asset at June 30, 2009 is more likely than not based upon expectations of future taxable income in the jurisdictions in which it operates and available tax planning strategies.

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Public and Private Exchange Offers

        On July 23, 2009 and July 29, 2009, Citigroup closed its exchange offers with the private and public holders of preferred stock and trust preferred securities, as applicable ($32.8 billion in aggregate liquidation value). In connection with these exchanges, the U.S. Treasury also exchanged $25 billion of aggregate liquidation value of its preferred stock, for a total exchange of $57.8 billion. See "Events in 2009—Public and Private Exchange Offers" above.

Sale of Nikko Asset Management

        On July 30, 2009, Citigroup entered into a definitive agreement to sell its entire ownership interest in Nikko Asset Management to The Sumitomo Trust and Banking Co., Ltd. for an all-cash consideration of approximately $795 million (¥75.6 billion). The sale is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2009, subject to regulatory approvals and customary closing conditions, and is not expected to have a material impact on Citi's net income.

        As required by SFAS 165, Subsequent Events, the Company has evaluated subsequent events through August 7, 2009, which is the date its Consolidated Financial Statements were issued.

ACCOUNTING CHANGES AND FUTURE APPLICATION OF ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

        See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of "Accounting Changes" and "Future Application of Accounting Standards."


Table of Contents


SEGMENT, BUSINESS AND PRODUCT INCOME (LOSS) AND REVENUES

        The following tables show the income (loss) and revenues for Citigroup on a segment, business and product view:

Citigroup Income (Loss)

 
 Second Quarter  
 Six Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Income from Continuing Operations

                   

CITICORP

                   

Regional Consumer Banking

                   
 

North America

 $(15)$169  NM $182 $514  (65)%
 

EMEA

  (110) 37  NM  (143) 56  NM 
 

Latin America

  70  334  (79)% 239  765  (69)
 

Asia

  272  451  (40) 523  987  (47)
              
  

Total

 $217 $991  (78)%$801 $2,322  (66)%
              

Securities and Banking

                   
 

North America

 $3 $646  (100)%$2,570 $2,028  27%
 

EMEA

  746  376  98  2,918  572  NM 
 

Latin America

  522  325  61  921  626  47 
 

Asia

  596  306  95  1,652  933  77 
              
  

Total

 $1,867 $1,653  13%$8,061 $4,159  94%
              

Transaction Services

                   
 

North America

 $181 $61  NM $319 $149  NM 
 

EMEA

  350  299  17% 676  577  17%
 

Latin America

  150  151  (1) 310  292  6 
 

Asia

  293  278  5  573  582  (2)
              
  

Total

 $974 $789  23%$1,878 $1,600  17%
              
 

Institutional Clients Group

 $2,841 $2,442  16%$9,939 $5,759  73%
              
  

Total Citicorp

 $3,058 $3,433  (11)%$10,740 $8,081  33%
              

CITI HOLDINGS

                   

Brokerage and Asset Management

 $6,814 $267  NM $6,872 $153  NM 

Local Consumer Lending

  (4,193) (1,206) NM  (5,612) (1,081) NM 

Special Asset Pool

  (1,262) (4,286) 71% (5,237) (13,447) 61%
              
  

Total Citi Holdings

 $1,359 $(5,225) NM $(3,977)$(14,375) 72%
              

Corporate/Other

 $(30)$(537) 94%$(682)$(1,221) 44%
              

Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations

 $4,387 $(2,329) NM $6,081 $(7,515) NM 
              

Discontinued Operations

 $(142)$(94)   $(259)$(35)   

Net Income (Loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

 $(34)$72    $(50)$56    
              

Citigroup's Net Income (Loss)

 $4,279 $(2,495) NM $5,872 $(7,606) NM 
              

NM    Not meaningful


Table of Contents

Citigroup Revenues

 
 Second Quarter  
 Six Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

CITICORP

                   

Regional Consumer Banking

                   
 

North America

 $1,761 $2,111  (17)%$3,850 $4,445  (13)%
 

EMEA

  394  508  (22) 754  969  (22)
 

Latin America

  1,819  2,371  (23) 3,610  4,606  (22)
 

Asia

  1,631  1,891  (14) 3,162  3,835  (18)
              
  

Total

 $5,605 $6,881  (19)%$11,376 $13,855  (18)%
              

Securities and Banking

                   
 

North America

 $1,898 $3,507  (46)%$7,142 $7,099  1%
 

EMEA

  2,555  1,970  30  6,776  3,703  83 
 

Latin America

  1,046  722  45  1,844  1,403  31 
 

Asia

  1,373  1,207  14  3,534  2,919  21 
              
  

Total

 $6,872 $7,406  (7)%$19,296 $15,124  28%
              

Transaction Services

                   
 

North America

 $656 $511  28%$1,245 $1,017  22%
 

EMEA

  860  947  (9) 1,704  1,831  (7)
 

Latin America

  340  374  (9) 683  714  (4)
 

Asia

  627  647  (3) 1,225  1,334  (8)
              
  

Total

 $2,483 $2,479   $4,857 $4,896  (1)%
              
 

Institutional Clients Group

 $9,355 $9,885  (5)%$24,153 $20,020  21%
              
  

Total Citicorp

 $14,960 $16,766  (11)%$35,529 $33,875  5%
              

CITI HOLDINGS

                   

Brokerage and Asset Management

 $12,339 $2,467  NM $14,040 $4,857  NM 

Local Consumer Lending

  3,930  6,224  (37)% 10,383  13,724  (24)%

Special Asset Pool

  (519) (6,612) 92% (5,221) (21,020) 75%
              
  

Total Citi Holdings

 $15,750 $2,079  NM $19,202 $(2,439) NM 
              

Corporate/Other

 $(741)$(1,307) 43%$(241)$(1,741) 86%
              
  

Total Net Revenues

 $29,969 $17,538  71%$54,490 $29,695  83%
              

NM    Not meaningful


Table of Contents


CITICORP

 
 Second Quarter  
 Six Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 
 

Net interest revenue

 $8,445 $8,634  (2)%$16,632 $16,664   
 

Non-interest revenue

  6,515  8,132  (20) 18,897  17,211  10%
              

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $14,960 $16,766  (11)%$35,529 $33,875  5%
              

Provision for credit losses and for benefits and claims

                   
 

Net credit losses

 $1,560 $1,289  21%$2,797 $2,218  26%
 

Credit reserve build/ (release)

  1,165  573  NM  2,105  1,047  NM 
              
 

Provision for loan losses

 $2,725 $1,862  46%$4,902 $3,265  50%
 

Provision for benefits & claims

  15  2  NM  27  3  NM 
 

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

  83  (75) NM  115  (75) NM 
              
  

Total provision for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 $2,823 $1,789  58%$5,044 $3,193  58%
              

Total operating expenses

 $7,849 $9,900  (21)%$15,046 $19,226  (22)%
              

Income from continuing operations before taxes

 $4,288 $5,077  (16)%$15,439 $11,456  35%

Provision for income taxes

  1,230  1,644  (25) 4,699  3,375  39 
              

Income from continuing operations

 $3,058 $3,433  (11)%$10,740 $8,081  33%

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  3  21  (86)   34  (100)
              

Citicorp's net income

 $3,055 $3,412  (10)%$10,740 $8,047  33%
              

Balance Sheet Data (in billions)

                   

Total EOP assets

 $985 $1,160  (15)%         

Average assets

 $1,000 $1,307  (23)%$1,019 $1,343  (24)%

Total EOP deposits

 $702 $681  3%         
              

NM    Not meaningful


Table of Contents

REGIONAL CONSUMER BANKING

 
 Second Quarter  
 Six Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Net interest revenue

 $3,903 $4,220  (8)%$7,516 $8,205  (8)%

Non-interest revenue

  1,702  2,661  (36) 3,860  5,650  (32)
              

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $5,605 $6,881  (19)%$11,376 $13,855  (18)%
              

Total operating expenses

 $3,491 $4,194  (17)%$6,797 $7,976  (15)%
              
  

Net credit losses

 $1,392 $981  42%$2,552 $1,844  38%
  

Credit reserve build/ (release)

  592  382  55  1,256  832  51 
  

Provision for benefits & claims

  15  2  NM  27  3  NM 
              

Provision for loan losses and for benefits and claims

 $1,999 $1,365  46%$3,835 $2,679  43%
              

Income from continuing operations before taxes

 $115 $1,322  (91)%$744 $3,200  (77)%

Income taxes (benefits)

  (102) 331  NM  (57) 878  NM 
              

Income from continuing operations

 $217 $991  (78)%$801 $2,322  (66)%

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

    4  (100)   5  (100)
              

Net income

 $217 $987  (78)%$801 $2,317  (65)%
              

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $191 $230  (17)%$187 $227  (18)%

Return on assets

  0.46% 1.73%    0.86% 2.05%   

Average deposits(in billions of dollars)

 $268 $272  (1)%         
              

Net credit losses as a % of average loans

  4.78% 2.99%            
              

Revenue by business

                   
 

Retail Banking

 $3,193 $3,577  (11)%$6,148 $7,028  (13)%
 

Citi-Branded Cards

  2,412  3,304  (27) 5,228  6,827  (23)
              
   

Total revenues

 $5,605 $6,881  (19)%$11,376 $13,855  (18)%
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations by business

                   
 

Retail Banking

 $428 $563  (24)%$871 $1,263  (31)%
 

Citi-Branded Cards

  (211) 428  NM  (70) 1,059  NM 
              
   

Total

 $217 $991  (78)%$801 $2,322  (66)%
              

NM    Not meaningful


Table of Contents

NORTH AMERICA REGIONAL CONSUMER BANKING

 
 Second Quarter  
 Six Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Net interest revenue

 $1,150 $887  30%$2,170 $1,695  28%

Non-interest revenue

  611  1,224  (50) 1,680  2,750  (39)
              

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $1,761 $2,111  (17)%$3,850 $4,445  (13)%
              

Total operating expenses

  1,337 $1,590  (16)%$2,692 $3,063  (12)%
              
 

Net credit losses

 $305 $136  NM $563 $281  100%
 

Credit reserve build/(release)

  130  126  3% 372  295  26 
 

Provision for benefits and claims

  15  2  NM  27  2  NM 
              

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

 $450 $264  70%$962 $578  66%
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes

 $(26)$257  NM $196 $804  (76)%

Income taxes (benefits)

  (11) 88  NM  14  290  (95)
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $(15)$169  NM $182 $514  (65)%

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

             
              

Net income (loss)

 $(15)$169  NM $182 $514  (65)%
              

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $33 $38  (13)%$33 $39  (15)%

Return on assets

  (0.18)% 1.79%    1.11% 2.65%   

Average deposits(in billions of dollars)

 $136 $122  11%         
              

Net credit losses as a % of average loans

  6.51% 3.42%            
              

Revenue by business

                   
 

Retail banking

 $955 $952   $1,837 $1,802  2%
 

Citi-branded cards

  806  1,159  (30)% 2,013  2,643  (24)
              
  

Total

 $1,761 $2,111  (17)%$3,850 $4,445  (13)%
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations by business

                   
 

Retail banking

 $88 $60  47%$169 $62  NM 
 

Citi-branded cards

  (103) 109  NM  13  452  (97)%
              
  

Total

 $(15)$169  NM $182 $514  (65)%
              

NM    Not meaningful

2Q09 vs. 2Q08

Revenues, net of interest expense declined 17%, primarily reflecting higher credit losses flowing through the credit card securitization trusts.Net interest revenue was up 30% driven by higher net interest margin in cards as a result of higher interest revenue from pricing actions and lower funding costs, and by the impact of higher deposit and loan volumes in retail banking. Average deposits were 11% higher than the prior year, driven by growth in consumer CDs and commercial deposits.Non-interest revenue declined 50%, primarily driven by higher credit losses flowing through the securitization trusts partially offset by other securitization revenue, and by the absence of a prior-year $170 million gain on a cards portfolio sale.

Operating expenses declined 16%, reflecting the benefits from re-engineering efforts, lower marketing costs, and the absence of a $55 million repositioning charge in the second quarter of 2008.

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased 70% primarily due to rising net credit losses in both cards and retail banking. The $130 million loan loss reserve build in the second quarter reflected the continued weakness in consumer credit. The cards net credit loss ratio increased 400 basis points to 7.51%, while the retail banking net credit loss ratio increased 174 basis points to 4.85%.

2Q09 YTD vs. 2Q08 YTD

Revenues, net of interest expense declined 13%, primarily reflecting higher credit losses flowing through the credit card securitization trusts.Net interest revenue was up 28% driven by the impact of pricing actions and lower funding costs in cards, and by higher deposit and loan volumes in retail banking, with average deposits up 8% from the prior-year period.Non-interest revenue declined 39%, driven by higher credit losses flowing through the securitization trusts partially offset by other securitization revenue, and by the absence of a $349 million gain on the sale of Visa shares and a $170 million gain on a cards portfolio sale in the prior-year period.

Operating expenses declined 12%, reflecting the benefits from re-engineering efforts, lower marketing costs, and the absence of $120 million of repositioning charges in the prior-year period, which were partially offset by the absence of a prior-year $159 million Visa litigation reserve release.

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased 66% primarily due to rising net credit losses in both cards and retail banking. Continued weakness in consumer credit and trends in the macro-economic environment,


Table of Contents

including rising unemployment and higher bankruptcy filings, drove higher credit costs. The cards net credit loss ratio increased 330 basis points to 6.61%, while the retail banking net credit loss ratio increased 39 basis points to 4.06%.

Recent Legislative Actions

The Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009

        On May 22, 2009, The Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 (CARD Act) was enacted into law. The CARD Act will affect various credit card practices of card issuers, including Citigroup, such as marketing, underwriting, pricing, billing and disclosure requirements, thus reshaping the way consumers have access to and use their credit cards. Many of the provisions in the CARD Act will take effect in February 2010, although some take effect earlier in August 2009 and some later in August 2010.

        Among other things, the CARD Act:

        Certain provisions of the CARD Act are consistent with Citigroup's existing practices and will not require any changes or modifications. Other provisions, however, such as those that restrict the ability of an issuer to increase APRs on outstanding balances or that establish standards for penalty fees and payment allocation will require Citigroup to make fundamental changes to its credit card business model. The impact of the CARD Act on Citigroup's credit businesses is not fully known at this time. Such impact will ultimately depend upon the successful implementation of changes to Citigroup's business model and the continued regulatory interpretations of the CARD Act, among other considerations.

Mortgage Modification Programs

        See "Citi Holdings—Local Consumer Lending" below for a description of the Obama administration's Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) and Citigroup's mortgage modification programs generally.


Table of Contents

EMEA REGIONAL CONSUMER BANKING

 
 Second Quarter  
 Six Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Net interest revenue

 $243 $335  (27)%$467 $634  (26)%

Non-interest revenue

  151  173  (13) 287  335  (14)
              

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $394 $508  (22)%$754 $969  (22)%
              

Total operating expenses

 $282 $395  (29)%$538 $770  (30)%
              
 

Net credit losses

 $121 $48  NM $210 $95  NM 
 

Credit reserve build/(release)

  158  15  NM  230  31  NM 
              

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

 $279 $63  NM $440 $126  NM 
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes

 $(167)$50  NM $(224)$73  NM 

Income taxes (benefits)

  (57) 13  NM  (81) 17  NM 
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $(110)$37  NM $(143)$56  NM 

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

    4  (100)%   6  (100)%
              

Net income (loss)

 $(110)$33  NM $(143)$50  NM 
              

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $11 $14  (21)%$11 $14  (21)%

Return on assets

  (4.01)% 0.95%    (2.62)% 0.72%   

Average deposits(in billions of dollars)

 $9 $12  (25)%         
              

Net credit losses as a % of average loans

  5.78% 1.91%            
              

Revenue by business

                   
 

Retail banking

 $234 $325  (28)%$439 $621  (29)%
 

Citi-branded cards

  160  183  (13) 315  348  (9)
              
  

Total

 $394 $508  (22)%$754 $969  (22)%
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations by business

                   
 

Retail banking

 $(76)$6  NM $(117)$(2) NM 
 

Citi-branded cards

  (34) 31  NM  (26) 58  NM 
              
  

Total

 $(110)$37  NM $(143)$56  NM 
              

NM    Not meaningful

2Q09 vs. 2Q08

Revenues, net of interest expense, declined 22%. More than half of the revenue decline is attributable to changes in foreign currency translation (generally referred to throughout this report as "FX translation"). Other drivers included lower wealth management and lending revenues due to lower volumes and spread compression. Investment sales and assets under management declined by 38% and 32%, respectively.Net interest revenue was 27% lower than the prior-year period with average loans for retail banking down 22% as a result of a lower risk profile, branch closures, and the impact of FX translation. Average deposits were down 25%, primarily due to FX translation. Retail banking net interest margin declined from 11.0% to 9.8%.Non-interest revenue declined 13%, primarily due to the impact of FX translation.

Operating expenses declined 29%, reflecting expense control actions, lower marketing expenditure, and the impact of FX translation. Cost savings were achieved by branch closures, headcount reductions and re-engineering efforts.

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased $216 million, to $279 million in the second quarter of 2009. Net credit losses increased from $48 million to $121 million, while the loan loss reserve build increased from $15 million to $158 million. Higher credit costs reflected continued credit deterioration, particularly in UAE, Turkey, Poland and Russia.

2Q09 YTD vs. 2Q08 YTD

Revenues, net of interest expense, declined 22%. Over half of the revenue decline is attributable to the impact of FX translation. Other drivers included lower wealth management and lending revenues due to lower volumes and spread compression. Investment sales and assets under management declined by 47% and 32%, respectively.Net interest revenue was 26% lower than the prior year with average loans for retail banking down 21%, average deposits down 25%, and net interest margin decreasing as well.Non-interest revenue declined 14%, primarily due to the impact of FX translation.

Operating expenses declined 30%, reflecting expense control actions, lower marketing spend, and the impact of FX translation. Cost savings were achieved by branch closures, headcount reductions and re-engineering efforts.

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased $314 million, to $440 million for during the first six months of 2009. Net credit losses increased from $95 million to $210 million, while the loan loss reserve build increased from $31 million to $230 million. Higher credit costs reflected continued credit deterioration across the region.


Table of Contents

LATIN AMERICA REGIONAL CONSUMER BANKING

 
 Second Quarter  
 Six Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Net interest revenue

 $1,350 $1,741  (22)%$2,601 $3,377  (23)%

Non-interest revenue

  469  630  (26) 1,009  1,229  (18)
              

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $1,819 $2,371  (23)%$3,610 $4,606  (22)%
              

Total operating expenses

 $1,039 $1,238  (16)%$1,950 $2,183  (11)%
              
 

Net credit losses

 $612 $555  10%$1,153 $1,021  13%
 

Credit reserve build/(release)

  154  157  (2) 320  394  (19)
 

Provision for benefits and claims

          1  (100)
              

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

 $766 $712  8%$1,473 $1,416  4%
              

Income from continuing operations before taxes

 $14 $421  (97)%$187 $1,007  (81)%

Income taxes (benefits)

  (56) 87  NM  (52) 242  NM 
              

Income from continuing operations

 $70 $334  (79)%$239 $765  (69)%

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

             
              

Net income

 $70 $334  (79)%$239 $765  (69)%
              

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $61 $80  (24)%$59 $77  (23)%

Return on assets

  0.46% 1.68%    0.82% 2.00%   

Average deposits(in billions of dollars)

 $36 $42  (14)%         
              

Net credit losses as a % of average loans

  8.83% 6.91%            
              

Revenue by business

                   
 

Retail banking

 $981 $1,060  (7)%$1,874 $2,113  (11)%
 

Citi-branded cards

  838  1,311  (36) 1,736  2,493  (30)
              
  

Total

 $1,819 $2,371  (23)%$3,610 $4,606  (22)%
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations by business

                   
 

Retail banking

 $150 $149  1%$330 $461  (28)%
 

Citi-branded cards

  (80) 185  NM  (91) 304  NM 
              
  

Total

 $70 $334  (79)%$239 $765  (69)%
              

NM    Not meaningful

2Q09 vs. 2Q08

Revenues, net of interest expense, declined 23%, mainly due to the impact of FX translation, lower cards receivables and spread compression, partially offset by higher business volumes in retail banking.Net interest revenue was 22% lower than the prior year caused by the decrease in cards receivables as well as lower spreads resulting from a lower risk profile, partially offset by higher business volumes in retail banking. Average deposits were down 14%, due primarily to the impact of FX translation.Non-interest revenue declined 26%, primarily due to the decline in cards fees as well as the impact of FX translation.

Operating expenses declined 16%, reflecting the benefits from re-engineering efforts and the impact of FX translation.

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased 8% as a result of continued losses, especially in the cards business, which were partially offset by the impact of FX translation. Cards net credit loss rates increased from 11.4% to 16.2%. Rising losses were particularly apparent in the Mexico cards portfolio.

2Q09 YTD vs. 2Q08 YTD

Revenues, net of interest expense, declined 22% driven by the impact of FX translation, lower volumes and spread compression in the cards business.Net interest revenue was 23% lower than the prior year with average credit cards loans down 23%, and net interest margin decreasing as well due to the cards spread compression impact.Non-interest revenue declined 18%, primarily due to the decline in cards fees as well as the impact of FX translation.

Operating expenses declined 11%, reflecting the benefits from re-engineering efforts and the impact of FX translation. The prior-year period also included a $257 million expense benefit related to a legal vehicle restructuring in Mexico.

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased 4% as result of deteriorating credit conditions, especially in the cards business, which were partially offset by the impact of FX translation. Cards net credit loss rates increased from 10.9% to 16.1%. Credit deterioration was particularly apparent in the Mexico cards portfolio.


Table of Contents

ASIA REGIONAL CONSUMER BANKING

 
 Second Quarter  
 Six Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Net interest revenue

 $1,160 $1,257  (8)%$2,278 $2,499  (9)%

Non-interest revenue

  471  634  (26) 884  1,336  (34)
              

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $1,631 $1,891  (14)%$3,162 $3,835  (18)%
              

Total operating expenses

 $833 $971  (14)%$1,617 $1,960  (18)%
              
 

Net credit losses

 $354 $242  46%$626 $447  40%
 

Credit reserve build/(release)

  150  84  79  334  112  NM 
              

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

 $504 $326  55%$960 $559  72%
              

Income from continuing operations before taxes

 $294 $594  (51)%$585 $1,316  (56)%

Income taxes (benefits)

  22  143  (85) 62  329  (81)
              

Income from continuing operations

 $272 $451  (40)%$523 $987  (47)%

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

          (1) 100 
              

Net income

 $272 $451  (40)%$523 $988  (47)%
              

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $86 $98  (12)%$85 $97  (12)%

Return on assets

  1.27% 1.85%    1.24% 2.05%   

Average deposits(in billions of dollars)

 $88 $97  (9)%         
              

Net credit losses as a % of average loans

  2.30% 1.32%            
              

Revenue by business

                   
 

Retail banking

 $1,023 $1,240  (18)%$1,998 $2,492  (20)%
 

Citi-branded cards

  608  651  (7) 1,164  1,343  (13)
              
  

Total

 $1,631 $1,891  (14)%$3,162 $3,835  (18)%
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations by business

                   
 

Retail banking

 $266 $348  (24)%$489 $742  (34)%
 

Citi-branded cards

  6  103  (94) 34  245  (86)
              
  

Total

 $272 $451  (40)%$523 $987  (47)%
              

NM    Not meaningful

2Q09 vs. 2Q08

Revenue, net of interest expense declined 14% driven by a 35% decline in investment sales and the impact of FX translation.Net interest revenue was 8% lower than the prior-year period. Average loans and deposits were down 16% and 9%, respectively, and net interest margin decreased as well, in each case primarily due to the impact of FX translation.Non-interest revenue declined 26%, primarily due to the decline in investment sales.

Operating expenses declined 14%, reflecting the benefits from re-engineering efforts and the impact of FX translation.

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased 55% mainly due to deteriorating credit conditions, partially offset by FX translation. Rising losses were particularly apparent in the card portfolios in India and Korea.

2Q09 YTD vs. 2Q08 YTD

Revenue, net of interest expense declined 18% driven by a 51% decline in investment sales and the impact of FX translation.Net interest revenue was 9% lower than the prior-year period. Average loans were down 17% and deposits were down 13%, respectively, and net interest margin decreased as well.Non-interest revenue declined 34%, primarily due to the decline in investment sales.

Operating expenses declined 18%, reflecting the benefits from re-engineering efforts and the impact of FX translation.

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased 72% mainly due to higher net credit losses in India and Korea.


Table of Contents

INSTITUTIONAL CLIENTS GROUP (ICG)

 
 Second Quarter  
 Six Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Commissions and Fees

 $466 $690  (32)%$884 $1,429  (38)%

Administration and Other Fiduciary Fees

  1,262  1,433  (12) 2,510  2,833  (11)

Investment banking

  1,242  1,396  (11) 2,182  2,265  (4)

Principal transactions

  1,081  1,954  (45) 8,231  4,958  66 

Other

  762  (2) NM  1,230  76  NM 
              
 

Total non-interest revenue

 $4,813 $5,471  (12)%$15,037 $11,561  30%
 

Net interest revenue (including dividends)

  4,542  4,414  3  9,116  8,459  8 
              

Total revenues, net of interest expenses

 $9,355 $9,885  (5)%$24,153 $20,020  21%

Total operating expenses

  4,358  5,706  (24) 8,249  11,250  (27)
 

Net credit losses

  168  308  (45) 245  374  (34)
 

Provisions for unfunded lending commitments

  83  (75) NM  115  (75) NM 
 

Credit reserve build/ (release)

  573  191  NM  849  215  NM 
              

Provision for credit losses

 $824 $424  94%$1,209 $514  NM 
              

Income from continuing operations before taxes

 $4,173 $3,755  11%$14,695 $8,256  78%

Income taxes (benefits)

  1,332  1,313  1  4,756  2,497  90 
              

Income from continuing operations

 $2,841 $2,442  16%$9,939 $5,759  73%

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  3  17  (82)   29  (100)
              

Net income

 $2,838 $2,425  17%$9,939 $5,730  73%
              

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $809 $1,077  (25%)$832 $1,117  (26)%

Return on assets

  1.41% 0.91%    2.41% 1.03%   
              

Revenue by region:

                   
 

North America

 $2,554 $4,018  (36)%$8,387 $8,116  3%
 

EMEA

  3,415  2,917  17  8,480  5,534  53 
 

Latin America

  1,386  1,096  26  2,527  2,117  19 
 

Asia

  2,000  1,854  8  4,759  4,253  12 
              
  

Total

 $9,355 $9,885  (5)%$24,153 $20,020  21%
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations by region:

                   
 

North America

 $184 $707  (74)%$2,889 $2,177  33%
 

EMEA

  1,096  675  62  3,594  1,149  NM 
 

Latin America

  672  476  41  1,231  918  34 
 

Asia

  889  584  52  2,225  1,515  47 
              
  

Total

 $2,841 $2,442  16%$9,939 $5,759  73%
              

Average loans by region(in billions):

                   
 

North America

 $43 $48  (10)%         
 

EMEA

  47  54  (13)         
 

Latin America

  20  25  (20)         
 

Asia

  28  37  (24)         
              
  

Total

 $138 $164  (16)%         
              

NM    Not meaningful


Table of Contents

SECURITIES AND BANKING

 
 Second Quarter  
 Six Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Net interest revenue

 $3,087 $3,100   $6,255 $5,850  7%

Non-interest revenue

  3,785  4,306  (12)% 13,041  9,274  41 
              

Revenues, net of interest expense

 $6,872 $7,406  (7)%$19,296 $15,124  28%

Operating expenses

  3,270  4,371  (25) 6,087  8,655  (30)
 

Net credit losses

  171  305  (44) 245  370  (34)
 

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

  83  (75) NM  115  (75) NM 
 

Credit reserve build (release)

  565  183  NM  843  206  NM 
              

Provision for credit losses

  819  413  98  1,203  501  NM 
              

Income before taxes and noncontrolling interest

 $2,783 $2,622  6%$12,006 $5,968  NM 

Income taxes

  916  969  (5) 3,945  1,809  NM 

Income from continuing operations

  1,867  1,653  13  8,061  4,159  94%

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

    8  (100) 1  12  (92)
              

Net income

 $1,867 $1,645  13%$8,060 $4,147  94%
              

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $749 $1,004  (25)%$772 $1,044  (26)%

Return on assets

  1.00% 0.66%    2.11% 0.80%   
              

Revenues by region:

                   
 

North America

 $1,898 $3,507  (46)%$7,142 $7,099  1%
 

EMEA

  2,555  1,970  30  6,776  3,703  83 
 

Latin America

  1,046  722  45  1,844  1,403  31 
 

Asia

  1,373  1,207  14  3,534  2,919  21 
              

Total revenues

 $6,872 $7,406  (7)%$19,296 $15,124  28%
              

Net income (loss) from continuing operations by region:

                   
 

North America

 $3 $646  (100)%$2,570 $2,028  27%
 

EMEA

  746  376  98  2,918  572  NM 
 

Latin America

  522  325  61  921  626  47 
 

Asia

  596  306  95  1,652  933  77 
              

Total net income from continuing operations

 $1,867 $1,653  13%$8,061 $4,159  94%
              

Securities and Banking

                   
 

Revenue details:

                   
 

Net Investment Banking

 $1,160 $1,335  (13)%$2,142 $2,165  (1)%
 

Lending

  (928) (155) NM  (1,257) 764  NM 
 

Equity markets

  1,101  1,526  (28) 2,705  2,687  1 
 

Fixed income markets

  5,573  4,439  26  15,794  9,171  72 
 

Private bank

  477  593  (20) 976  1,226  (20)
 

Other Securities and Banking

  (511) (332) (54) (1,064) (889) (20)
              

Total Securities and Banking Revenues

 $6,872 $7,406  (7)%$19,296 $15,124  28%
              

NM    Not meaningful

2Q09 vs. 2Q08

Revenues, net of interest expense decreased 7% primarily due to revenue marks of negative $777 million and lending revenues of negative $928 million, due mainly to losses on credit default swap hedges, which offset strong trading results in fixed income markets revenues. Investment banking revenues were down 13% from the second quarter of 2008, a quarter driven by stronger M&A and equity volumes, due primarily to lower advisory and equity underwriting revenues. Equity markets revenues were down 28% from the prior-year period, primarily driven by net negative revenue marks of $694 million due to the narrowing in Citigroup credit spreads, partially offset by the narrowing of counterparty spreads. Private bank revenues were down 20% on lower assets under management, decreased investment sales and lower average lending volumes. Fixed income markets revenues were up 26% driven by strong results across most fixed income categories reflecting favorable positioning and sustained client activity.

Operating expenses decreased 25% driven by headcount reductions, repositioning charges recorded in the second quarter of 2008 and reductions in other operating expenses.

Provision for credit losses and for benefits and claims increased by 98% mainly due to increased credit reserve builds and provisions for unfunded lending commitments, partially offset by lower net credit losses.

2Q09 YTD vs. 2Q08 YTD

Revenues, net of interest expense increased 28% mainly due to an increase in fixed income markets of $6.6 billion to $15.8 billion, mostly in the first quarter of 2009, reflecting strong trading results, offset by a decrease in lending revenues to a negative $1.3 billion mainly from losses on credit default swap hedges.

Operating expenses decreased 30% driven by lower compensation due to headcount reductions and benefits from re-engineering and expense management.


Table of Contents

Provision for credit losses and for benefits and claims increased $0.5 billion to $1.2 billion mainly from increased credit reserve builds.


Table of Contents

TRANSACTION SERVICES

 
 Second Quarter  
 Six Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Net interest revenue

 $1,455 $1,314  11%$2,861 $2,609  10%

Non-interest revenue

  1,028  1,165  (12) 1,996  2,287  (13)
              

Revenues, net of interest expense

 $2,483 $2,479   $4,857 $4,896  (1)%

Operating expenses

  1,088  1,335  (19)% 2,162  2,595  (17)

Provision for credit losses and for benefits and claims

  5  11  (55) 6  13  (54)
              

Income before taxes and noncontrolling interest

 $1,390 $1,133  23%$2,689 $2,288  18%

Income taxes

  416  344  21  811  688  18 

Income from continuing operations

  974  789  23  1,878  1,600  17 

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  3  9  (67) (1) 17  NM 
              

Net income

 $971 $780  24%$1,879 $1,583  19%
              

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $60 $73  (18)%$60 $73  (18)%

Return on assets

  6.49% 4.30%    6.32% 4.36%   
              

Revenues by region:

                   
 

North America

 $656 $511  28%$1,245 $1,017  22%
 

EMEA

  860  947  (9) 1,704  1,831  (7)
 

Latin America

  340  374  (9) 683  714  (4)
 

Asia

  627  647  (3) 1,225  1,334  (8)
              

Total revenues

 $2,483 $2,479   $4,857 $4,896  (1)%
              

Net income (loss) from continuing operations by region:

                   
 

North America

 $181 $61  NM $319 $149  NM 
 

EMEA

  350  299  17% 676  577  17%
 

Latin America

  150  151  (1) 310  292  6 
 

Asia

  293  278  5  573  582  (2)
              

Total net income from continuing operations

 $974 $789  23%$1,878 $1,600  17%
              

Key Indicators(in billions of dollars)

                   

Average deposits and other customer liability balances

 $288 $275  5%         

EOP assets under custody(in trillions of dollars)

 $11.1 $12.8  (13)         
              

NM    Not meaningful

2Q09 vs. 2Q08

Revenues, net of interest expense were $2.5 billion, in line with the prior-year period as clients remained actively engaged. Growth in deposits and increasing spreads were offset by the impact of FX translation and declines in assets under custody. Average deposits increased by 5%, driven by growth in North America and Asia. Assets under custody declined by 13% from the prior-year period, primarily due to lower equity markets.

Operating expenses declined by 19% driven by headcount reduction, re-engineering efforts, expense management initiatives and the impact of FX translation.

2Q09 YTD vs. 2Q08 YTD

Revenues, net of interest expense of $4.9 billion decreased slightly from the prior-year period driven primarily by the impact of FX translation, as well as by lower volumes and asset under custody valuations.

Operating expenses declined 17% driven by headcount reduction and re-engineering benefits, as well as the impact of FX translation.


Table of Contents


CITI HOLDINGS

 
 Second Quarter  
 Six Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 
 

Net interest revenue

 $4,495 $5,929  (24)%$9,878 $11,526  (14)%
 

Non-interest revenue

  11,255  (3,850) NM  9,324  (13,965) NM 
              

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $15,750 $2,079  NM $19,202 $(2,439) NM 
              

Provision for credit losses and for benefits and claims

                   
 

Net credit losses

 $6,795 $3,021  NM $12,840 $5,729  NM 
 

Credit reserve build/ (release)

  2,711  2,100  29% 4,405  3,566  24%
              
 

Provision for loan losses

 $9,506 $5,121  86%$17,245 $9,295  86%
 

Provision for benefits & claims

  294  258  14  613  532  15 
 

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

  52  (68) NM  80  (68) NM 
              
 

Total provision for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 $9,852 $5,311  86%$17,938 $9,759  84%
              

Total operating expenses

 $3,827 $5,316  (28)%$8,215 $11,270  (27)%
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes

 $2,071 $(8,548) NM $(6,951)$(23,468) 70%

Provision (benefits) for income taxes

  712  (3,323) NM  (2,974) (9,093) 67 
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $1,359 $(5,225) NM $(3,977)$(14,375) 72%

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  (37) 52  NM  (50) 22  NM 
              

Citi Holding's net income (loss)

 $1,396 $(5,277) NM $(3,927)$(14,397) 73%
              

Balance Sheet Data (in billions)

                   

Total EOP assets

 $649 $833  (22)%         
              

Average assets

 $677 $852  (21)%         
              

Total EOP deposits

 $88 $84  5%         
              

NM    Not meaningful


Table of Contents

BROKERAGE AND ASSET MANAGEMENT

 
 Second Quarter  
 Six Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars
 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Net interest revenue

 $168 $230  (27)%$516 $409  26%

Non-interest revenue

  12,171  2,237  NM  13,524  4,448  NM 
              

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $12,339 $2,467  NM $14,040 $4,857  NM 
              

Total operating expenses

 $1,096 $2,002  (45)%$2,642 $4,452  (41)%
              
 

Net credit losses

 $1 $   $3 $10  (70)%
 

Credit reserve build/(release)

  3  9  (67)% 46  10  NM 
 

Provision for benefits and claims

  34  45  (24) 75  97  (23)
              

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

 $38 $54  (30)%$124 $117  6%
              

Income from continuing operations before taxes

 $11,205 $411  NM $11,274 $288  NM 

Income taxes (benefits)

  4,391  144  NM  4,402  135  NM 
              

Income from continuing operations

 $6,814 $267  NM $6,872 $153  NM 

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  6  49  (88)% (11) 38  NM 
              

Net income

 $6,808 $218  NM $6,883 $115  NM 
              

EOP assets (in billions of dollars)

 $56 $65  (14)%         

EOP deposits (in billions of dollars)

 $56 $50  12          
              

NM    Not meaningful

2Q09 vs. 2Q08

Revenues, net of interest expense increased $9.9 billion due to an $11.1 billion pretax gain on sale ($6.7 billion after-tax) on the Morgan Stanley Smith Barney joint venture transaction, which closed on June 1, 2009. Excluding the gain, revenues declined $1.2 billion driven by the absence of one month of Smith Barney revenues as well as the impact of market conditions on Smith Barney transactional and fee-based revenue relative to the prior year.

Operating expenses decreased 45% from the prior-year period, primarily driven by lower revenue-driven expenses in Smith Barney, a one month absence of Smith Barney expenses, lower variable compensation and re-engineering efforts, particularly in retail alternative investments.

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims decreased by 30% mainly reflecting lower provisions for benefits and claims.

2Q09 YTD vs. 2Q08 YTD

Revenues, net of interest expense increased $9.2 billion due to an $11.1 billion pre-tax gain on sale ($6.7 billion after-tax) on the Morgan Stanley Smith Barney joint venture transaction which closed on June 1, 2009. Excluding the gain, revenue declined $1.9 billion driven by the absence of one month of Smith Barney revenues as well as the impact of market conditions on Smith Barney transactional and fee-based revenue relative to the prior year.

Operating expenses decreased $1.8 billion, or 41%, primarily driven by lower revenue-driven expenses in Smith Barney, a one month absence of Smith Barney expenses, lower variable compensation and re-engineering efforts, particularly in retail alternative investments.

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased by 6% due to reserve builds in Smith Barney for SFAS 114 (ASC 310-10-35) impaired loans and lending to address client liquidity needs related to auction rate securities holdings, partially offset by lower provisions for benefits and claims.


Table of Contents

LOCAL CONSUMER LENDING

 
 Second Quarter  
 Six Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Net interest revenue

 $3,387 $4,807  (30)%$7,277 $9,403  (23)%

Non-interest revenue

  543  1,417  (62) 3,106  4,321  (28)
              

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $3,930 $6,224  (37)%$10,383 $13,724  (24)%
              

Total operating expenses

 $2,524 $3,046  (17)%$5,135 $6,247  (18)%
              
 

Net credit losses

 $5,156 $2,982  73%$9,688 $5,629  72%
 

Credit reserve build/(release)

  2,812  1,862  51  4,399  3,156  39 
 

Provision for benefits and claims

  260  213  22  538  435  24 
              

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

 $8,228 $5,057  63%$14,625 $9,220  59%
              

Loss from continuing operations before taxes

 $(6,822)$(1,879) NM $(9,377)$(1,743) NM 

Income taxes (benefits)

  (2,629) (673) NM  (3,765) (662) NM 
              

Loss from continuing operations

 $(4,193)$(1,206) NM $(5,612)$(1,081) NM 

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

  5  8  (38)% 10  12  (17)%
              

Net loss

 $(4,198)$(1,214) NM $(5,622)$(1,093) NM 
              

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $398 $478  (17)%$403 $479  (16)%
              

Net credit losses as a % of average loans

  6.26% 3.16%            
              

NM    Not meaningful

2Q09 vs. 2Q08

Revenues, net of interest expense decreased 37% mainly due to a decline in net interest revenue, higher net credit losses flowing through the securitization trusts in North America and a special FDIC assessment.Net interest revenue was 30% lower than the prior year driven by lower balances (due to run-off and credit tightening) and spread compression due largely to higher non-accrual loans, the FDIC special assessment and the impact of loan modifications. Average loans were down 13%, with North America (ex Cards) down 11%, North America Cards down 20%, and International down 21%.Non-interest revenue declined 62%, primarily due to higher credit costs flowing through the securitization trusts in North America and lower securitization gains. Non-interest revenue was also negatively impacted by $266 million of losses on credit default swap hedges.

Operating expenses decreased 17% primarily due to re-engineering actions, lower volumes and marketing expenses and the absence of a $85 million repositioning charge in the prior-year quarter. The declines in expenses were partially offset by higher other real estate owned assets (OREO) and collections costs.

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased by 63%, reflecting higher reserve builds of $1.0 billion and increased net credit losses of $2.2 billion driven by deteriorating economic conditions globally. The reserve builds in the 2009 second quarter were mainly driven by increases for residential mortgage loans in North America as well as increases in EMEA. Net credit losses were higher versus the prior year across all businesses. The net credit reserve build for residential mortgages was driven by increases in first and second mortgages as well as continued deterioration in the housing market. Credit costs in North America also reflected a continued increase in credit losses in credit cards and commercial real estate. International credit costs reflected continued deterioration in CitiFinancial Japan, the U.K., Greece and Spain. The net credit loss ratio increased 310 basis points from the prior-year quarter with North America (ex Cards) up 267 basis points to 4.98%, International up 422 basis points to 9.69% and North America Cards up 707 basis points to 14.83%.

2Q09 YTD vs. 2Q08 YTD

Revenues, net of interest expense decreased 24% due to a decline in net interest revenue, higher net credit losses flowing through the securitization trusts in North America and a special FDIC assessment.Net interest revenue was 23% lower than the prior year driven by lower balances (due to run-off and credit tightening) and spread compression due largely to higher non-accrual loans, the FDIC special assessment and the impact of loan modifications.Non-interest revenue declined 28%, primarily due to higher credit costs flowing through the securitization trusts in North America and lower securitization gains. Non-interest revenue was also negatively impacted by $266 million of losses on credit default swap hedges. Year-to-date non-interest revenue also included a $1.1 billion pretax gain on the sale of the Company's remaining stake in Redecard as compared to a prior-year pretax gain on sale of Redecard of $663 million.

Operating expenses decreased 18% primarily due to re-engineering actions, lower volumes and marketing expenses and the absence of prior-year repositioning charges. The declines in expenses were partially offset by higher OREO and collections costs.

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased by 59%, reflecting higher reserve builds of $1.2 billion and increased net credit losses of $4.1 billion driven by deteriorating economic conditions globally. The reserve builds in 2009 were mainly driven by increases for residential mortgage loans and retail partners cards in North America as well as increases in EMEA; net credit losses were higher versus the prior year across all businesses.

Assets declined 16%, primarily driven by lower loans due to run-off and the impact of credit tightening.


Table of Contents

Mortgage Modifications and Recent Legislative Actions

Citigroup Mortgage Modification Programs

        The Company has instituted a variety of programs to assist borrowers with financial difficulties to stay in their homes. These programs include modifying the original loan terms, reducing interest rates, extending the remaining loan duration and/or waiving a portion of the remaining principal balance. Each borrower's financial situation is evaluated individually. If a borrower meets certain criteria (for example, based on verifiable cash reserves and the level of debt to income), Citi works to develop a modification program suited to the needs of the borrower's situation.

        In addition, Citi expects a significant number of loan modifications will be offered under the U.S. Treasury's Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP), which was rolled out in the second quarter.

        During the second quarter of 2009, Citi observed declines in mortgage delinquencies for loans that were delinquent in the 90 day to 179 day bucket. Well over half of these declines were attributable to loss mitigation and modification initiatives that the Company has put in place, including the loan modification programs described above. The future loss rates associated with these loan modification programs (both for those loans that qualify under HAMP and for those made under Citi's loan modification programs) could have an impact on the Company's future delinquency trends and loan loss reserving actions.

Home Affordable Modification Program

        On March 4, 2009, the U.S. Treasury (UST) announced details of the Obama administration's Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP). HAMP is designed to reduce the monthly mortgage payments to a 31% housing debt ratio by lowering the interest rate, extending the term of the loan and forbearing principal of certain eligible borrowers who have defaulted on their mortgages, or who are at risk of imminent default due to economic hardship. In order to be entitled to loan modifications, borrowers must complete a three-month trial period, and must be current at the end of the trial period. During the trial period, the original terms of the loans remain in effect pending final modification.

        With respect to interest rate reductions, if the reduced interest rate is equal to or greater than the Freddie Mac Survey Rate at the time of modification, the reduced rate is permanent. If the reduced rate is less than the Freddie Mac Survey Rate at the time of modification, the rate will remain in effect for a period of five years. After five years, the interest rate may increase annually to a rate capped at the Freddie Mac Survey Rate at the time of original modification. The financial impact of interest rate reductions are shared between participating financial institutions, including Citi's wholly-owned subsidiary, CitiMortgage Inc., and the UST.

        Under HAMP, investors and servicers of mortgages are entitled to receive certain payments from the UST based on the completion of loan modifications and continued borrower performance under the modified terms. To date, Citi has not recorded any fees under HAMP, as the trial period began in June 2009. During the trial period, the borrower continues to owe interest at the original contractual rate and recognizes interest to the extent permitted under Citi's nonaccrual policy. In addition, the Company does not record charge-offs while the loans are in the trial period if at least one payment under the trial period terms has been made.

The Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009

        See "Citicorp—North America Retail Consumer Banking" above for a description of The Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 (CARD Act) and the potential impact of the CARD Act on Citigroup's credit card businesses.


Table of Contents

SPECIAL ASSET POOL

 
 Second Quarter  
 Six Months  
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 % Change 2009 2008 % Change 

Net interest revenue

 $940 $892  5%$2,085 $1,714  22%

Non-interest revenue

  (1,459) (7,504) 81  (7,306) (22,734) 68 
              

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $(519)$(6,612) 92%$(5,221)$(21,020) 75%
              

Total operating expenses

 $207 $268  (23)%$438 $571  (23)%
              
 

Net credit losses

 $1,638 $39  NM $3,149 $90  NM 
 

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

  52  (68) NM  80  (68) NM 
 

Credit reserve builds (release)

  (104) 229  NM  (40) 400  NM 
              

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 $1,586 $200  NM $3,189 $422  NM 
              

(Loss) from continuing operations before taxes

 $(2,312)$(7,080) 67%$(8,848)$(22,013) 60%

Income taxes (benefits)

  (1,050) (2,794) 62  (3,611) (8,566) 58 
              

(Loss) from continuing operations

 $(1,262)$(4,286) 71%$(5,237)$(13,447) 61%

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  (48) (5) NM  (49) (28) (75)
              

Net (loss)

 $(1,214)$(4,281) 72%$(5,188)$(13,419) 61%
              

EOP assets(in billions of dollars)

  201  299  (33)%         
              

NM    Not meaningful

2Q09 vs. 2Q08

Revenues, net of interest expense increased 92% primarily due to favorable net revenue marks relative to the prior-year quarter. Revenue in the current quarter included positive marks of $613 million on subprime-related direct exposures and $804 million positive CVA on derivative positions, excluding monoline insurers, partially offset by $967 million other revenue write-downs and losses. Revenue in the current quarter was also negatively impacted by $1.1 billion of losses related to hedges of various asset positions.

Operating expenses declined 23%, mainly driven by lower volumes and lower transaction expenses.

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims increased by $1.4 billion primarily driven by $1.6 billion in write-offs, partially offset by a lower loan loss reserve of $213 million. The net $104 million net credit reserve release in the second quarter of 2009 was driven by a $750 million release for specific counterparties, partially offset by builds for specific counterparties.

2Q09 YTD vs. 2Q08 YTD

Revenues, net of interest expense increased 75% primarily due to favorable net revenue relative to the prior period. Revenue year-to-date included a $1.1 billion positive CVA on derivative positions, offset by negative revenue of $1.7 billion on subprime-related direct exposures and $1.1 billion of negative marks for private equity positions. Revenue year-to-date was also negatively impacted by $2.9 billion related to CVA on fair value option liabilities and monolines, Alt-A mortgages, CRE, and leveraged finance commitments.

Operating expenses declined 23% mainly driven by lower volumes and lower transaction expenses.

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims increased by $2.8 billion primarily driven by the $3.1 billion increase in write-offs over the period. Significant write-offs included exposures in Lyondell Basell. The net $40 million net credit reserve release in the current period was driven by a $2.1 billion release for specific counterparties (including Lyondell Basell), partially offset by builds for specific counterparties.


Table of Contents


CORPORATE/OTHER

 
 Second Quarter Six Months 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Net interest revenue

 $(111)$(577)$(755)$(1,116)

Non-interest revenue

  (630) (730) 514  (625)
          

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $(741)$(1,307)$(241)$(1,741)

Total operating expenses

  323  (2) 423  95 

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

  1    1   
          

(Loss) from continuing operations before taxes

 $(1,065)$(1,305)$(665)$(1,836)

Income taxes (benefits)

  (1,035) (768) 17  (615)
          

(Loss) from continuing operations

 $(30)$(537)$(682)$(1,221)

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

  (142) (94) (259) (35)
          

Net (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests

 $(172)$(631)$(941)$(1,256)

Net Income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

    (1)    
          

Net (loss)

 $(172)$(630)$(941)$(1,256)
          

 
 Third Quarter Nine Months 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Net interest revenue

 $(461)$(678)$(1,216)$(1,794)

Non-interest revenue

  1,132  212  1,646  (413)
          

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $671 $(466)$430 $(2,207)

Total operating expenses

  441  (77) 864  18 

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

    1  1  1 
          

Income (Loss) from continuing operations before taxes

 $230  (390)$(435)$(2,226)

Income taxes (benefits)

  128  (203) 145  (818)
          

Income (Loss) from continuing operations

 $102 $(187)$(580)$(1,408)

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

  (418) 613  (677) 578 
          

Net Income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests

 $(316)$426 $(1,257)$(830)

Net Income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

         
          

Net Income (loss)

 $(316)$426 $(1,257)$(830)
          

2Q093Q09 vs. 2Q083Q08

        Revenues,net of interest expense, increased primarily due to lower intersegment eliminations, partiallythe pretax gain related to the preferred exchange, partly offset by hedging activities.the interest cost of the trust preferred securities.

        Operating Expenses increased primarily due to lower intersegment eliminations.

Income Taxes (benefits) decreased due to higher tax benefits held at Corporate ineliminations and the current year.absence of prior-year reserve releases.

2Q093Q09 YTD vs 2Q08vs. 3Q08 YTD

        Revenues,net of interest expense, increased primarily due to lowerthe pretax gain related to the preferred exchange, intersegment eliminations, hedging activities, and the impact of changes in U.S. dollar rates.rates, partly offset by the interest cost of the trust preferred securities.

        Operating Expenses increased primarily due to lower intersegment eliminations.eliminations and the absence of prior-year reserve releases.


Table of Contents


TARP AND OTHER REGULATORYGOVERNMENT PROGRAMS

Issuance of $45 Billion of PreferredCommon Stock and Warrants Issued to Purchase Common StockUST under TARP

        OnIn connection with its participation in TARP in October 28, 2008 and December 31, 2008, Citigroup raised $25 billion and $20 billion, respectively, through the sale of preferred stock andCiti issued two warrants to purchaseexercisable for common stock to the UST as part ofUST. These warrants remain outstanding following the UST's Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) Capital Purchase Program. All of the proceeds were treated as Tier 1 Capital for regulatory capital purposes.

        As part of the public and private exchange offers, the aggregate $25 billion of preferred stock issued to the UST in October 2008 was exchanged for interim securities and a warrant. The warrant will terminate, and the interim securities will automatically convert into Citigroup common stock, following shareholder approval of the increase in the Company's authorized common stock. See "Events in 2009—Public and Private Exchange Offers" above. In addition, as part of the public and private exchange offers, the aggregate $20 billion of preferred stock issued to the UST in December 2008 was exchanged for newly issued 8% trust preferred securities. See "Events in 2009—Public and Private Exchange Offers" above.

        For a discussion of the accounting impactcompletion of the exchange offers, see "Events in 2009—Public and Private Exchange Offers" above.offers.

        The warrant issued to the UST in October 2008 has a term of 10 years, an exercise price of $17.85 per share and is exercisable for approximately 210.1 million shares of common stock, which will be reduced by one-half if Citigroup raises an additional $25 billion through the issuance of Tier 1-qualifying perpetual preferred or common stock by December 31, 2009.stock. The value ascribed to the warrant, or $1.3 billion out of the $25 billion in cash proceeds, on a relative fair value basis, was recorded in Citigroup's stockholders' equity and resulted in an increase inAdditional paid-in capital.

        The warrant issued to the UST in December 2008 also has a term of 10 years, an exercise price of $10.61 per share and is exercisable for approximately 188.5 million shares of common stock. The value ascribed to the warrant, or $0.5 billion out of the $20 billion in cash proceeds, on a relative fair value basis, was recorded in Citigroup's stockholders' equity and resulted in an increase inAdditional paid-in capital.

        The fair value for the warrants was calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The valuation was based on the Citigroup stock price, stock volatility, dividend yield, and the risk free rate on the measurement date for both the issuances.

        See "U.S. Government Loss-Sharing Agreement" below for a description of the third common stock warrant issued, outstanding and held by the UST.

Implementation and Management of TARP Programs

        Citigroup has established a Special TARP Committee composed of senior executives to approve, monitor and track how the USG's TARP funds invested in Citi, or $45 billion, are utilized. Citi is required to adhere to the following objectives as a condition of the USG's capital investments:

        The Committee has established specific guidelines, which are consistent with the objectives and spirit of TARP. Pursuant to these guidelines, Citi will use TARP capital only for those purposes expressly approved by the Committee.

        Committee approval is the final stage in a four-step review process to evaluate proposals from Citi businesses for the use of TARP capital, considering the risk, the potential financial impact and returns.

        On August 11, 2009, Citi published its most recent quarterly report summarizing its TARP spending initiatives for the second quarter of 2009 (the report is available at www.citigroup.com). The report states that the Committee had authorized $50.8 billion in initiatives backed by TARP capital which has subsequently been increased to $53.8 billion. As of September 30, 2009, the Company has deployed approximately $18.3 billion of funds under the approved initiatives.

FDIC's Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program

        Under the terms of the FDIC's Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (TLGP), the FDIC will guarantee,guaranteed, until the earlier of either its maturity or June 30, 2012 (for qualifying debt issued before April 1, 2009) or December 31, 2012 (for qualifying debt issued on or after April 1, 2009 through October 31, 2009), certain qualifying senior unsecured debt issued by certain Citigroup entities between October 31, 2008 and October 31, 2009 in amounts up to 125% of the qualifying debt for each qualifying entity. The FDIC chargescharged Citigroup a fee ranging from 50 to 150 basis points in accordance with a prescribed fee schedule for any qualifying debt issued with the FDIC guarantee.

        As to any entity participating in the The TLGP the TLGP regulations grant discretion to the FDIC, after consultation with the participating entity's appropriate Federal banking agency, to determine that the entity will no longer be permitted to continuewas terminated on October 31, 2009 and Citigroup and its affiliates have elected not to participate in the TLGP. If the FDIC makes that determination, it will inform the entity that it will no longer be provided the protectionsany FDIC-approved extension of the TLGP. Such a determination will not affect the guarantee of prior debt issuances under the TLGP.program.

        As of JuneSeptember 30, 2009, Citigroup and its affiliates had issued a total of $44.7$54.6 billion of long-term debt that is covered under the FDIC guarantee, with $6.35 billion maturing in 2010, $14.75$18.75 billion maturing in 2011 and $23.5$29.5 billion maturing in 2012.

        In addition, as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009, Citigroup, through its subsidiaries, also had $27.7$4.37 billion in outstanding commercial paper and interbank deposits backed by the FDIC. The FDIC also chargescharged a fee ranging from 50 to 150 basis points in connection with the issuance of those instruments.

FDIC Increased Deposit Insurance

        On October 4, 2008, As approved by the FDIC, increasedeffective October 1, 2009 through the insurance it providestermination of the TLGP program on U.S. deposits in most banksOctober 31, 2009, Citigroup issued commercial paper of various tenors without the FDIC guarantee.

        See "Capital Resources and savings associations located in the United States, including Citibank, N.A., from $100,000 to $250,000 per depositor, per insured bank.


Table of ContentsLiquidity" below for further information on Citi's funding and liquidity programs.

U.S. Government Loss-Sharing Agreement

Background

        On January 15, 2009, Citigroup entered into a definitivean agreement with the UST, the FDIC and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (collectively referred to in this section as the USG) on losses arising on a $301 billion portfolio of Citigroup assets (valued as of November 21, 2008, other than as set forth in note 1 to the table below). As shown in the table below,Primarily as a result of the receipt of principal repayment and charge-offs to date, the total asset pool has declined by approximately $35$50 billion on a GAAP basis to approximately $266.4$250.4 billion from the original $301 billion.as of September 30, 2009.

        As consideration for the loss-sharing agreement, Citigroup issued approximately $7.1 billion in preferred stock to the UST and the FDIC, as well as a warrant exercisable for common stock to the UST. Of the issuance, $3.617 billion, representing the total fair value of the issued shares and warrant, was treated as Tier 1 Capital.

As part of the public and private exchange offers, the approximately $7.1 billion of preferred stock issued to the UST and FDIC in consideration for the loss-sharing agreement was exchanged for newly issued 8% trust preferred securities. See "Events"Significant Events in the Third Quarter of 2009—Public and Private Exchange Offers" above. The warrant issued to the UST as consideration for the loss-sharing agreement has a term of 10 years, an exercise price of $10.61 per share and is exercisable for approximately 66.5 million shares of common stock. The fair value of the warrant of $88


Table of Contents

million was recorded as a credit toAdditional paid-in capital at the time of issuance.

Terms of Agreement

        The loss-sharing agreement extends for 10 years for residential assets and five years for non-residential assets. Under the agreement, a "loss" on a portfolio asset is generally defined to include a charge-off or a realized loss upon collection, through a permitted disposition or exchange, or upon a foreclosure or short-sale loss, but not merely through a change in Citigroup's fair value accounting for the asset or the creation or increase of a related loss reserve. Once a loss is recognized under the agreement, the aggregate amount of qualifying losses across the portfolio in a particular period is netted against the aggregate recoveries and gains across the portfolio, all on a pretax basis.

        The resulting net loss amount on the portfolio is the basis of the loss-sharing agreement between Citigroup and the USG. Citigroup will bear the first $39.5 billion of such net losses, which amount was determined using (i) an agreed-upon $29 billion of first losses, (ii) Citigroup's then-existing reserve with respect to the portfolio of approximately $9.5 billion, and (iii) an additional $1.0 billion as an agreed-upon amount in exchange for excluding the effects of certain hedge positions from the portfolio. Net losses, if any, on the portfolio after Citigroup's losses exceed the $39.5 billion first-loss amount will be borne 90% by the USG and 10% by Citigroup in the following manner:

        Approximately $2.5$2.8 billion of GAAP losses on the asset pool were recorded in the secondthird quarter of 2009, bringing the GAAP losses on the portfolio to date to approximately $5.3$8.1 billion (i.e., for the period of November 21, 2008 through JuneSeptember 30, 2009). These losses count towards Citigroup's $39.5 billion first-loss position.

        The Federal Reserve Bank of New York will implement its loss-sharing obligations under the agreement, if any, by making a loan after Citigroup's first-loss position and the obligations of the UST and FDIC have been exhausted, in an amount equal to the then aggregate value of the remaining covered asset pool (after reductions for charge-offs, pay-downs and realized losses) as determined in accordance with the agreement. Following the loan, as losses are incurred on the remaining covered asset pool, Citigroup will be required to immediately repay 10% of such losses to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The loan is non-recourse to Citigroup, other than with respect to the repayment obligation in the preceding sentence and interest on the loan. The loan is recourse only to the remaining covered asset pool, which is the sole collateral to secure the loan. The loan will bear interest at the overnight index swap rate plus 300 basis points.

        The covered asset pool includes U.S.-based exposures and transactions that were originated prior to March 14, 2008. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the compositionUSG had a 120-day period, beginning April 15, 2009, to review the asset pool to confirm asset eligibility. The USG has completed its review and, in October 2009, substantially agreed with Citigroup on the final asset pool's composition. The USG's final approval of the covered assetpool is expected in November 2009. After final approval of the pool, the amount ofUSG has the right to review and confirm Citigroup's first-loss position ($39.5 billion) and the premiumconsideration paid by Citigroup for the loss coverage, are subject to final confirmation by the USG of, among other things, the qualification of assets under the asset eligibility criteria,each based on expected losses and reserves. See "Events in 2009—Loss-Sharing Agreement."

reserves associated with the final pool (using a methodology and assumptions consistent with those used to set the $39.5 billion first-loss position). The USG has a 120-day confirmation periodis expected to complete this review in the compositionfourth quarter of the asset pool from the date that Citi submitted its revised asset pool. The revised asset pool was submitted by Citigroup on April 15, 2009. The advisor to the USG has been conducting its review of the assets and it is thus currently expected that the USG will complete its review by August 13, 2009. The final composition of the asset pool will be established within 90 days after the USG completes its review.

        The agreement includes guidelines for governance and asset management with respect to the covered asset pool, including reporting requirements and notice and approval rights of the USG at certain thresholds. If covered losses exceed $19 billion, the USG may increase the required reporting or alter the thresholds for notice and approval. If covered losses exceed $27 billion, the USG has the right to changereplace Citi as the asset manager for the covered asset pool, among other things.

Accounting and Regulatory Capital Treatment

        Citigroup accounts for the loss-sharing agreement as an indemnification agreement pursuant to the guidance in FASB Statement No. 141 (revised 2007),ASC 805-20-30-18,Business CombinationsCombinations. (ASC 805-20-30-18). Citigroup recorded an asset of $3.617 billion (equal to the fair value of the consideration issued to the USG, described above)USG) inOther assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The asset will be amortized as anOther operating expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income on a straight-line basis over the coverage periods of 10 years for residential assets and five years, for non-residential assets,respectively, based on the relative initial principal amounts of each


Table of Contents

group. During the quarter and nine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009, Citigroup recorded $120$122 million and $412 million, respectively, as anOther operating expense.

        Under indemnification accounting, recoveries (gains), if any, will be recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income in the same future periods that cumulative losses recorded under U.S. GAAP on the covered assets exceed the $39.5 billion first-loss amount. The Company will recognize and measure an indemnification asset on the same basis that it recognizes losses on the covered assets in the Consolidated Statement of Income. For example, for a covered loan classified as held-for-investment and reported in the balance sheet at amortized cost, the Company would recognize and measure an indemnification asset due from the USG at the same time related loan loss reserves are recorded for that loan equal to 90% of the amount of the loan loss reserve, subject to the first-loss limitation.

        UnderFurther, under indemnification accounting, recoveries (gains) may be recorded at times when such amounts are not contractually receivable from the USG based on the definition of covered losses in the loss-sharing agreement. Such amounts may or may not thereafter become contractually receivable, depending upon whether or not they become covered "losses" (see above for definition of covered "loss"). Indemnification accounting matches the amount and timing of the recording of recoveries with the amount and timing of the recognition of losses based on the U.S. GAAP accounting for the covered assets, as opposed to the amount and timing of recognition as defined in the loss-sharing agreement. The indemnification asset amount recorded will be adjusted, as appropriate, to take into consideration additional revenue and expense amounts related to the covered assets specifically defined as


Table of Contents

recoverable or non-recoverable in the loss-sharing program. As of June 30, 2009, the Company has recognized cumulative U.S. GAAP losses on the covered assets that are substantially below our first-loss amount and, therefore, no additional indemnification asset has been recognized as of such time.

        The fair value of the warrant issued to the UST, which remains outstanding is $88 million and was recorded as a credit toAdditional paid-in capital at the time of issuance.

        The covered assets are risk-weighted at 20% for purposes of calculating the Tier 1 Capital ratio at JuneSeptember 30, 2009.

Asset Values as of September 30, 2009

        The following table summarizes the assets that were part of the covered asset pool agreed to between Citigroup and the USG as of January 16,15, 2009, with their values as of November 21, 2008 (except as set forth in the note 1 to the table below), and the balances as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009, reflecting changes in the balances of assets that remained qualified, plus approximately $10 billion of new replacement assets that Citi substituted for non-qualifying assets.assets between January 15, 2009 and April 15, 2009. The $266.4$250.4 billion of covered assets at JuneSeptember 30, 2009 are recorded in Citi Holdings within Local Consumer Lending ($183.2171.9 billion) and Special Asset Pool ($83.278.5 billion). TheAs discussed above, the asset pool, as revised, remains subject to the USG's final review process, anticipated to be completed by August 13, 2009, with final composition of the asset pool established within 90 days after the USG's completion of its review.approval, which is expected in November 2009.

Assets

In billions of dollars June 30,
2009
 November 21,
2008(1)(2)
 

Loans:

       
 

First mortgages

 $86.0 $98.0 
 

Second mortgages

  52.0  55.4 
 

Retail auto loans

  12.9  16.2 
 

Other consumer loans

  18.4  19.7 
      

Total consumer loans

 $169.3 $189.3 
      
 

CRE loans

 $11.4 $12.0 
 

Highly leveraged finance loans

  1.3  2.0 
 

Other corporate loans

  12.2  14.0 
      

Total corporate loans

 $24.9 $28.0 
      

Securities:

       
 

Alt-A

 $9.5 $11.4 
 

SIVs

  5.9  6.1 
 

CRE

  1.6  1.4 
 

Other

  9.0  11.2 
      

Total securities

 $26.0 $30.1 
      

Unfunded lending commitments (ULC)

       
 

Second mortgages

 $19.6 $22.4 
 

Other consumer loans

  2.6  3.6 
 

Highly leveraged finance

  0.0  0.1 
 

CRE

  4.2  5.5 
 

Other commitments

  19.8  22.0 
      

Total ULC

 $46.2 $53.6 
      

Total covered assets

 $266.4 $301.0 
      

In billions of dollars September 30,
2009
 November 21,
2008(1)
 

Loans:

       
 

First mortgages

 $81.0 $98.0 
 

Second mortgages

  49.6  55.4 
 

Retail auto loans

  10.8  16.2 
 

Other consumer loans

  17.6  19.7 
      

Total consumer loans

 $159.0 $189.3 
      
 

CRE loans

 $10.8 $12.0 
 

Highly leveraged finance loans

  0.2  2.0 
 

Other corporate loans

  10.5  14.0 
      

Total corporate loans

 $21.5 $28.0 
      

Securities:

       
 

Alt-A

 $9.1 $11.4 
 

SIVs

  5.8  6.1 
 

CRE

  1.5  1.4 
 

Other

  8.2  11.2 
      

Total securities

 $24.6 $30.1 
      

Unfunded lending commitments (ULC)

       
 

Second mortgages

 $18.3 $22.4 
 

Other consumer loans

  2.4  3.6 
 

Highly leveraged finance

  0.0  0.1 
 

CRE

  3.8  5.5 
 

Other commitments

  20.8  22.0 
      

Total ULC

 $45.3 $53.6 
      

Total covered assets

 $250.4 $301.0 
      

(1)
As a result of the initial confirmation process (conducted between November 21, 2008 and January 15, 2009), the covered asset pool includes approximately $99 billion of assets considered "replacement" assets (assets that were added to the pool to replace assets that were in the pool as of November 21, 2008 but were later determined not to qualify). Loss-sharing on qualifying losses incurred on these replacement assets was effective beginning January 15, 2009, instead of November 21, 2008.

(2)
Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.

Table of Contents

Implementation and Management of TARP Programs

        After Citigroup received the TARP capital, it established a Special TARP Committee composed of senior executives to approve, monitor and track how the funds are utilized. Citi is required to adhere to the following objectives as a condition of the USG's capital investment:

        The Committee has established specific guidelines, which are consistent with the objectives and spirit of the program. Pursuant to these guidelines, Citi will use TARP capital only for those purposes expressly approved by the Committee. TARP capital will not be used for compensation and bonuses, dividend payments, lobbying or government relations activities, or any activities related to marketing, advertising and corporate sponsorship. TARP capital will be used exclusively to support assets and not for expenses.

        Committee approval is the final stage in a four-step review process to evaluate proposals from Citi businesses for the use of TARP capital, considering the risk, the potential financial impact and returns.

        On May 12, 2009, Citi published its quarterly report summarizing its TARP spending initiatives for the first quarter of 2009 (the report is available at www.citigroup.com). The report states that the Committee has authorized $44.75 billion in initiatives backed by TARP capital which has subsequently been increased to $50.8 billion. As of June 30, 2009, the Company has deployed approximately $15.1billion of funds under the approved initiatives.


Table of Contents


MANAGING GLOBAL RISK

        Citigroup's risk management framework balances strong corporate oversight with well-defined independent risk management functions for each business and region, as well as cross-business product expertise. The Citigroup risk management framework is described in Citigroup's 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

DETAILS OF
LOAN AND CREDIT LOSS EXPERIENCEDETAILS

Loans Outstanding

In millions of dollars 2nd Qtr.
2009
 1st Qtr.
2009
 4th Qtr.
2008
 3rd Qtr.
2008
 2nd Qtr.
2008
 

Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period

 $31,703 $29,616 $24,005 $20,777 $18,257 
            

Provision for loan losses

                
  

Consumer

 $10,010 $8,010 $8,592 $7,831 $6,194 
  

Corporate

  2,223  1,905  3,579  1,112  789 
            

 $12,233 $9,915 $12,171 $8,943 $6,983 
            

Gross credit losses

                

Consumer(1)

                
 

In U.S. offices

 $4,694 $4,124 $3,610 $3,073 $2,584 
 

In offices outside the U.S. 

  2,305  1,936  1,818  1,914  1,798 

Corporate

                
 

In U.S. offices

  1,216  1,176  364  156  190 
 

In offices outside the U.S. 

  558  424  756  200  197 
            

 $8,773 $7,660 $6,548 $5,343 $4,769 
            

Credit recoveries

                

Consumer

                
 

In U.S. offices

 $131 $136 $132 $137 $145 
 

In offices outside the U.S. 

  261  213  219  252  289 

Corporate

                
 

In U.S. offices

  20  1  2  3  2 
 

In offices outside the U.S. 

  6  28  52  31  23 
            

 $418 $378 $405 $423 $459 
            

Net credit losses

                
 

In U.S. offices

 $5,759 $5,163 $3,840 $3,089 $2,627 
 

In offices outside the U.S. 

  2,596  2,119  2,303  1,831  1,683 
            

Total

 $8,355 $7,282 $6,143 $4,920 $4,310 
            

Other—net(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)

 $359 $(546)$(417)$(795)$(153)
            

Allowance for loan losses at end of period

 $35,940 $31,703 $29,616 $24,005 $20,777 
            

Allowance for loan losses as a % of total loans

  5.60% 4.82% 4.27% 3.35% 2.78%

Allowance for unfunded lending commitments(7)

 $1,082 $947 $887 $957 $1,107 
            

Total allowance for loan losses and unfunded lending commitments

 $37,022 $32,650 $30,503 $24,962 $21,884 
            

Net consumer credit losses

 $6,607 $5,711 $5,077 $4,598 $3,948 

As a percentage of average consumer loans

  5.88% 4.95% 4.12% 3.57% 2.95%
            

Net corporate credit losses/(recoveries)

 $1,748 $1,571 $1,066 $322 $362 

As a percentage of average corporate loans

  0.89% 0.79% 0.60% 0.19% 0.16%
            

Allowance for loan losses at end of period(8)

                
 

Citicorp

 $10,046 $8,520 $7,684 $6,651 $6,143 
 

Citi Holdings

  25,894  23,183  21,932  17,354  14,634 
            
   

Total Citigroup

 $35,940 $31,703 $29,616 $24,005 $20,777 
            

In millions of dollars September 30,
2009
 June 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

Consumer loans

          

In U.S. offices:

          
 

Mortgage and real estate(1)

 $191,748 $197,358 $219,482 
 

Installment, revolving credit, and other

  63,668  67,661  71,360 
 

Cards

  36,039  33,750  44,418 
 

Lease financing

  15  16  31 
        

 $291,470 $298,785 $335,291 
        

In offices outside the U.S.:

          
 

Mortgage and real estate(1)

 $47,568 $45,986 $44,382 
 

Installment, revolving credit, and other

  48,027  48,467  44,189 
 

Cards

  41,443  42,262  42,586 
 

Commercial and industrial

  11,835  10,947  13,897 
 

Lease financing

  345  339  304 
        

 $149,218 $148,001 $145,358 
        

Total consumer loans

 $440,688 $446,786 $480,649 

Unearned income

  803  866  738 
        

Consumer loans, net of unearned income

 $441,491 $447,652 $481,387 
        

Corporate loans

          

In U.S. offices:

          
 

Commercial and industrial

 $23,345 $30,567 $33,450 
 

Loans to financial institutions

  7,666  8,181  10,200 
 

Mortgage and real estate(1)

  23,221  23,862  16,643 
 

Installment, revolving credit, and other

  14,081  15,414  15,047 
 

Lease financing

  1,275  1,284  1,476 
        

 $69,588 $79,308 $76,816 
        

In offices outside the U.S.:

          
 

Commercial and industrial

 $73,564 $78,512 $85,492 
 

Installment, revolving credit, and other

  10,949  11,638  23,158 
 

Mortgage and real estate(1)

  12,023  11,887  11,375 
 

Loans to financial institutions

  16,906  15,856  18,413 
 

Lease financing

  1,462  1,560  1,850 
 

Governments and official institutions

  826  713  385 
        

 $115,730 $120,166 $140,673 
        

Total corporate loans

 $185,318 $199,474 $217,489 

Unearned income

  (4,598) (5,436) (4,660)
        

Corporate loans, net of unearned income

 $180,720 $194,038 $212,829 
        

Total loans—net of unearned income

 $622,211 $641,690 $694,216 
        

Allowance for loan losses—on drawn exposures

  (36,416) (35,940) (29,616)
        

Total loans—net of unearned income and allowance for credit losses

 $585,795 $605,750 $664,600 

Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans—net of unearned income

  5.85% 5.60% 4.27%
        

Allowance for consumer loan losses as a percentage of total consumer loans—net of unearned income

  6.44% 6.25% 4.61%

Allowance for corporate loan losses as a percentage of total corporate loans—net of unearned income

  4.42  4.11  3.48 
        

(1)
IncludedLoans secured primarily by real estate.

Table of Contents

Loan Accounting Policies

        The following are the Company's accounting policies for Loans, Allowance for Loan Losses and related lending activities.

Loans

        Loans are reported at their outstanding principal balances net of any unearned income and unamortized deferred fees and costs except that credit card receivable balances also include accrued interest and fees. Loan origination fees and certain direct origination costs are generally deferred and recognized as adjustments to income over the lives of the related loans.

        As described in Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company has elected fair value accounting for certain loans. Such loans are carried at fair value with changes in fair value reported in earnings. Interest income on such loans is recorded inInterest revenue at the contractually specified rate.

        Loans for which the fair value option has not been elected are classified upon origination or acquisition as either held-for-investment or held-for-sale. This classification is based on management's initial intent and ability with regard to those loans.

        Loans that are held-for-investment are classified asLoans, net of unearned income on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, and the related cash flows are included within the cash flows from investing activities category in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows on the line Changes in loans. However, when the initial intent for holding a loan has changed from held-for-investment to held-for-sale, the loan is reclassified to held-for-sale, but the related cash flows continue to be reported in cash flows from investing activities in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows on the line Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans.

        Substantially all of the consumer loans sold or securitized by Citigroup are U.S. prime residential mortgage loans or U.S. credit card receivables. The practice of the U.S. prime mortgage business has been to sell all of its loans except for nonconforming adjustable rate loans. U.S. prime mortgage conforming loans are classified as held-for-sale at the time of origination. The related cash flows are classified in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows in the cash flows from operating activities category on the line Change in loans held-for-sale.

        U.S. credit card receivables are classified at origination as loans-held-for sale to the extent that management does not have the intent to hold the receivables for the foreseeable future or until maturity. The U.S. credit card securitization forecast for the three months following the latest balance sheet date is the basis for the amount of such loans classified as held-for-sale. Cash flows related to U.S. credit card loans classified as held-for-sale at origination or acquisition are reported in the cash flows from operating activities category on the line Change in loans held-for-sale.

Consumer Loans

        Consumer loans represent loans and leases managed primarily by theRegional Consumer Banking andLocal Consumer Lending businesses. As a general rule, interest accrual ceases for installment and real estate (both open and closed end) loans when payments are 90 days contractually past due. For credit cards and unsecured revolving loans, however, the Company generally accrues interest until payments are 180 days past due. Citi's charge-off policies follow the general guidelines below:

        For a discussion of the impact of mortgage loan and credit card modification and forbearance programs on Citi's consumer loan businesses, see "Consumer Loan Modification Programs" below.

Corporate Loans

        Corporate loans represent loans and leases managed by ICG or the Special Asset Pool. Corporate loans are identified as impaired and placed on a cash (non-accrual) basis when it is determined that the payment of interest or principal is doubtful or when interest or principal is 90 days past due, except when the loan is well collateralized and in the process of collection. Any interest accrued on impaired corporate loans and leases is reversed at 90 days and charged against current earnings, and interest is thereafter included in earnings only to the extent actually received in cash. When there is doubt regarding the ultimate collectability of principal, all cash receipts are thereafter applied to reduce the recorded investment in the loan.


Table of Contents

        Impaired corporate loans and leases are written down to the extent that principal is judged to be uncollectible. Impaired collateral-dependent loans and leases, where repayment is expected to be provided solely by the sale of the underlying collateral and there are no other available and reliable sources of repayment, are written down to the lower of cost or collateral value. Cash-basis loans are returned to an accrual status when all contractual principal and interest amounts are reasonably assured of repayment and there is a sustained period of repayment performance in accordance with the contractual terms.

Loans Held-for-Sale

        Corporate and consumer loans that have been identified for sale are classified as loans held-for-sale included inOther assets. With the exception of certain mortgage loans for which the fair-value option has been elected, these loans are accounted for at the lower of cost or market value, with any write-downs or subsequent recoveries charged toOther revenue.

Allowance for Loan Losses

        Allowance for loan losses represents management's best estimate of probable losses inherent in the portfolio, as well as probable losses related to large individually evaluated impaired loans and troubled debt restructurings. Attribution of the allowance is made for analytical purposes only, and the entire allowance is available to absorb probable credit losses inherent in the overall portfolio. Additions to the allowance are made through the provision for credit losses. Credit losses are deducted from the allowance, and subsequent recoveries are added. Securities received in exchange for loan claims in debt restructurings are initially recorded at fair value, with any gain or loss reflected as a recovery or charge-off to the allowance, and are subsequently accounted for as securities available-for-sale.

Corporate Loans

        In the corporate portfolios, larger-balance, non-homogeneous exposures representing significant individual credit exposures are evaluated based upon the borrower's overall financial condition, resources, the prospects for support from any financially responsible guarantors and, if appropriate, the realizable value of any collateral. Reserves are established for these loans based upon an estimate of probable losses for the individual loans deemed to be impaired. This estimate may consider the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's contractual effective rate, the secondary market value of the loan or the fair value of collateral less disposal costs. The allowance for credit losses attributed to the remaining portfolio is established via a process that estimates the probable loss inherent in the portfolio based upon various analyses. These analyses consider historical default rates and loss severities, internal risk ratings, and geographic, industry, and other environmental factors.

        Management also considers overall portfolio indicators, including trends in internally risk-rated exposures, classified exposures, cash-basis loans, historical and forecasted write-offs, and a review of industry, geographic, and portfolio concentrations, including current developments within those segments. In addition, management considers the current business strategy and credit process, including credit limit setting and compliance, credit approvals, loan underwriting criteria, and loan workout procedures.

Consumer Loans

        ForConsumer loans, each portfolio of smaller-balance, homogeneous loans—including consumer mortgage, installment, revolving credit, and most other consumer loans—is independently evaluated for impairment. The allowance for loan losses attributed to these loans is established via a process that estimates the probable losses inherent in the specific portfolio based upon various analyses. These include migration analysis, in which historical delinquency and credit loss experience is applied to the current aging of the portfolio, together with analyses that reflect current trends and conditions.

        Management also considers overall portfolio indicators, including historical credit losses, delinquent, non-performing, and classified loans, trends in volumes and terms of loans, an evaluation of overall credit quality, the credit process, including lending policies and procedures, and economic, geographical, product and other environmental factors.

        In addition, valuation allowances are determined for impaired smaller-balance homogenous loans whose terms have been modified due to the borrowers' financial difficulties and where it has been determined that a concession will be granted to the borrower. Such modifications may include interest rate reductions, principal forgiveness and/or term extensions. These allowances are determined by comparing estimated cash flows of the loans discounted at the loans' original contractual interest rates to the carrying value of the loans.


Table of Contents

Reserve Estimates and Policies

        Management provides reserves for an estimate of probable losses inherent in the funded loan portfolio on the balance sheet in the form of an allowance for loan losses. These reserves are established in accordance with Citigroup's Credit Reserve Policies, as approved by the Audit and Risk Management Committee of the Company's Board of Directors. The Company's Chief Risk Officer and Chief Financial Officer review the adequacy of the credit loss reserves each quarter with representatives from the Risk Management and Finance staffs for each applicable business area.

        During these reviews, the above-mentioned representatives covering the business area having classifiably managed portfolios (that is, portfolios where internal credit-risk ratings are assigned, which are primarilyICG, Regional Consumer Banking andLocal Consumer Lending) and modified consumer loans where a concession was granted due to the borrowers' financial difficulties, and present recommended reserve balances for their funded and unfunded lending portfolios along with supporting quantitative and qualitative data. The quantitative data include:

        In addition, representatives from both the Risk Management and Finance staffs that cover business areas that have delinquency-managed portfolios containing smaller homogeneous loans (primarily the non-commercial lending areas ofConsumer Banking) present their recommended reserve balances based upon leading credit indicators, including loan delinquencies and changes in portfolio size as well as economic trends including housing prices, unemployment and GDP. This methodology is applied separately for each individual product within each different geographic region in which these portfolios exist.

        This evaluation process is subject to numerous estimates and judgments. The frequency of default, risk ratings, loss recovery rates, the size and diversity of individual large credits, and the ability of borrowers with foreign currency obligations to obtain the foreign currency necessary for orderly debt servicing, among other things, are all taken into account during this review. Changes in these estimates could have a direct impact on the credit costs in any quarter and could result in a change in the allowance. Changes to the reserve flow through the Consolidated Statement of Income on the linesProvision for loan losses andProvision for unfunded lending commitments.

Allowance for Unfunded Lending Commitments

        A similar approach to the allowance for loan losses are reservesis used for Troubled Debt Restructurings (TDRs)calculating a reserve for the expected losses related to unfunded loan commitments and standby letters of $3,810 million, $2,760 million, $2,180 million, $1,443 million, and $882 million ascredit. This reserve is classified on the balance sheet inOther liabilities.


Table of June 30, 2009, March 31, 2009, December 31, 2008, September 30, 2008, and June 30, 2008, respectively.Contents


Details of Credit Loss Experience

In millions of dollars 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009(1)
 1st Qtr.
2009
 4th Qtr
2008
 3rd Qtr.
2008
 

Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period

 $35,940 $31,703 $29,616 $24,005 $20,777 
            

Provision for loan losses

                
  

Consumer

 $7,321 $10,010 $8,010 $8,592 $7,831 
  

Corporate

  1,450  2,223  1,905  3,579  1,112 
            

 $8,771 $12,233 $9,915 $12,171 $8,943 
            

Gross credit losses

                

Consumer

                
 

In U.S. offices

 $4,459 $4,694 $4,124 $3,610 $3,073 
 

In offices outside the U.S. 

  2,406  2,305  1,936  1,818  1,914 

Corporate

                
 

In U.S. offices

  1,101  1,216  1,176  364  156 
 

In offices outside the U.S. 

  483  558  424  756  200 
            

 $8,449 $8,773 $7,660 $6,548 $5,343 
            

Credit recoveries

                

Consumer

                
 

In U.S. offices

 $149 $131 $136 $132 $137 
 

In offices outside the U.S. 

  288  261  213  219  252 

Corporate

                
 

In U.S. offices

  30  4  1  2  3 
 

In offices outside the U.S. 

  13  22  28  52  31 
            

 $480 $418 $378 $405 $423 
            

Net credit losses

                
 

In U.S. offices

 $5,381 $5,775 $5,163 $3,840 $3,089 
 

In offices outside the U.S. 

  2,588  2,580  2,119  2,303  1,831 
            

Total

 $7,969 $8,355 $7,282 $6,143 $4,920 
            

Other—net(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)

 $(326)$359 $(546)$(417)$(795)
            

Allowance for loan losses at end of period(7)

 $36,416 $35,940 $31,703 $29,616 $24,005 
            

Allowance for loan losses as a % of total loans

  5.85% 5.60% 4.82% 4.27% 3.35%

Allowance for unfunded lending commitments(8)

 $1,074 $1,082 $947 $887 $957 
            

Total allowance for loan losses and unfunded lending commitments

 $37,490 $37,022 $32,650 $30,503 $24,962 
            

Net consumer credit losses

 $6,428 $6,607 $5,711 $5,077 $4,598 

As a percentage of average consumer loans

  5.66% 5.88% 4.95% 4.12% 3.57%
            

Net corporate credit losses

 $1,541 $1,748 $1,571 $1,066 $322 

As a percentage of average corporate loans

  0.82% 0.89% 0.79% 0.60% 0.15%
            

Allowance for loan losses at end of period(9)

                
 

Citicorp

 $10,286 $10,046 $8,520 $7,684 $6,651 
 

Citi Holdings

  26,130  25,894  23,183  21,932  17,354 
            
   

Total Citigroup

 $36,416 $35,940 $31,703 $29,616 $24,005 
            

(1)
Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.

(2)
The third quarter of 2009 primarily includes a reduction to the credit loss reserves of $562 million related to the transfer of the U.K. Cards portfolio to held-for-sale partially offset by increases related to FX translation.

(3)
The second quarter of 2009 primarily includes increases to the credit loss reserves primarily related to FX translation.

(3)(4)
The first quarter of 2009 primarily includes reductions to the credit loss reserves of $213 million related to securitizations and reductions of approximately $320 million primarily related to FX translation.

(4)(5)
The fourth quarter of 2008 primarily includes reductions to the credit loss reserves of approximately $400 million primarily related to FX translation.

(5)(6)
The third quarter of 2008 primarily includes reductions to the credit loss reserves of $23 million related to securitizations, reductions of $244 million related to the sale of Citigroup's German Retail Banking Operation and reductions of approximately $500 million related to FX translation.

(6)(7)
The second quarterIncluded in the allowance for loan losses are reserves for troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) of $4,587 million, $3,810 million, $2,760 million, $2,180 million, and $1,443 million as of September 30, 2009, June 30, 2009, March 31, 2009, December 31, 2008, primarily includes reductions to the credit loss reserves of $21 million related to securitizations, reductions of $156 million related to the sale of CitiCapital and additions of $56 million related to purchase price adjustments for the Grupo Cuscatlan acquisition.September 30, 2008, respectively.

(7)(8)
Represents additional credit loss reserves for unfunded corporate lending commitments and letters of credit recordedOther Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

(8)(9)
Allowance for Creditloan losses represents management's best estimate of probable losses inherent in the portfolio.portfolio, as well as probable losses related to large individually evaluated impaired loans and troubled debt restructurings. Attribution of the allowance is made for analytical purposes only, and the entire allowance is available to absorb probable credit losses inherent in the overall portfolio.

Table of Contents

NON-PERFORMING ASSETS (NON-ACCRUAL LOANS, OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED AND OTHER REPOSSESSED ASSETS)
Non-Accrual Assets

        The table below summarizes the Company's view of non-accrual loans. Theseloans as of the periods indicated. Non-accrual loans are loans in which the borrower has fallen behind in interest payments, or, for corporate loans, where the Company has determined that the payment of interest or principal is doubtful, and are nowtherefore considered impaired. InAs discussed under "Accounting Policies" above, in situations where the Company reasonably expects that only a portion of the principal and interest owed will ultimately be collected, all payments received are reflected as a reduction of principal and not as interest income. There is no industry-wide definition of non-accrual assets, however, and as such, analysis against the industry is not always comparable.

        As discussed above under "Third Quarter of 2009 Management Summary," the Company has been actively moving corporate loans into the non-accrual category at earlier stages of anticipated distress. Corporate non-accrual loans may still be current on interest payments, however. Of the total portfolio of non-accrual corporate loans as of September 30, 2009, over two-thirds are current and continue to make their contractual payments.

Non-accrual loans

In millions of dollars 2nd Qtr.
2009
 1st Qtr.
2009
 4th Qtr.
2008
 3rd Qtr.
2008
 2nd Qtr.
2008
 

Citicorp

 $5,314 $3,829 $3,193 $2,408 $2,438 

Citi Holdings

  22,932  22,282  19,104  11,135  9,188 
            
 

Total Non-accrual loans (NAL)

 $28,246 $26,111 $22,297 $13,543 $11,626 
            

Corporate non-accrual loans(1)

                

North America

 $3,499 $3,789 $2,660 $851 $544 

EMEA

  7,690  6,479  6,330  1,406  1,557 

Latin America

  230  300  229  125  74 

Asia

  1,013  639  513  357  40 
            

 $12,432 $11,207 $9,732 $2,739 $2,215 
            
 

Citicorp

 $3,045 $1,825 $1,364 $605 $280 
 

Citi Holdings

 $9,387 $9,382 $8,368 $2,134 $1,935 
            

 $12,432 $11,207 $9,732 $2,739 $2,215 
            

Consumer non-accrual loans(1)(2)

                

North America

 $12,154 $11,687 $9,617 $7,941 $6,400 

EMEA

  1,356  1,128  948  904  856 

Latin America

  1,520  1,338  1,290  1,343  1,441 

Asia

  784  751  710  616  714 
            

 $15,814 $14,904 $12,565 $10,804 $9,411 
            
 

Citicorp

 $2,269 $2,004 $1,829 $1,803 $2,158 
 

Citi Holdings

  13,545  12,900  10,736  9,001  7,253 
            

 $15,814 $14,904 $12,565 $10,804 $9,411 
            

In millions of dollars 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 1st Qtr.
2009
 4th Qtr.
2008
 3rd Qtr.
2008
 

Citicorp

 $5,131 $5,314 $3,829 $3,193 $2,408 

Citi Holdings

  27,553  22,932  22,282  19,104  11,135 
            
 

Total Non-accrual loans (NAL)

 $32,684 $28,246 $26,111 $22,297 $13,543 
            

Corporate non-accrual loans(1)

                

North America

 $5,263 $3,499 $3,789 $2,660 $851 

EMEA

  7,969  7,690  6,479  6,330  1,406 

Latin America

  416  230  300  229  125 

Asia

  1,128  1,013  639  513  357 
            

 $14,776 $12,432 $11,207 $9,732 $2,739 
            
 

Citicorp

 $2,999 $3,045 $1,825 $1,364 $605 
 

Citi Holdings

 $11,777 $9,387 $9,382 $8,368 $2,134 
            

 $14,776 $12,432 $11,207 $9,732 $2,739 
            

Consumer non-accrual loans(1)

                

North America(2)

 $14,609 $12,154 $11,687 $9,617 $7,941 

EMEA

  1,314  1,356  1,128  948  904 

Latin America

  1,342  1,520  1,338  1,290  1,343 

Asia

  643  784  751  710  616 
            

 $17,908 $15,814 $14,904 $12,565 $10,804 
            
 

Citicorp

 $2,132 $2,269 $2,004 $1,829 $1,803 
 

Citi Holdings

  15,776  13,545  12,900  10,736  9,001 
            

 $17,908 $15,814 $14,904 $12,565 $10,804 
            

(1)
Excludes purchased distressed loans as they are accreting interest in accordance with Statement of Position 03-3, "Accounting for Certain Loans on Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer" (SOP 03-3/ASC 310-30).interest. The carrying value of these loans was $1.267 billion at September 30, 2009, $1.509 billion at June 30, 2009, $1.328 billion at March 31, 2009, $1.510 billion at December 31, 2008, and $1.550 billion at September 30, 2008, and $1.891 billion at June 30, 2008.

(2)
IncludesThe recent increases reflect the impact of the deterioration in the U.S. consumer real estate market.

Table of Contents

Non-Accrual Assets (Continued)

        The table below summarizes the Company's other real estate owned (OREO) assets. This represents the carrying value of all property acquired by foreclosure or other legal proceedings when the Company has taken possession of the collateral.

OREO 2nd Qtr.
2009
 1st Qtr.
2009
 4th Qtr.
2008
 3rd Qtr.
2008
 2nd Qtr.
2008
 

Citicorp

 $291 $307 $371 $425 $512 

Citi Holdings

  664  854  1,022  1,092  1,010 

Corporate/Other

  14  41  40  85  88 
            
 

Total OREO

 $969 $1,202 $1,433 $1,602 $1,610 
            

North America

 $789 $1,115 $1,349 $1,525 $1,528 

EMEA

  97  65  66  61  63 

Latin America

  29  20  16  14  17 

Asia

  54  2  2  2  2 
            

 $969 $1,202 $1,433 $1,602 $1,610 
            

Other repossessed assets(1)

 $72 $78 $78 $81 $94 
            

OREO 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 1st Qtr.
2009
 4th Qtr.
2008
 3rd Qtr.
2008
 

Citicorp

 $284 $291 $307 $371 $425 

Citi Holdings

  585  664  854  1,022  1,092 

Corporate/Other

  15  14  41  40  85 
            
 

Total OREO

 $884 $969 $1,202 $1,433 $1,602 
            

North America

 $682 $789 $1,115 $1,349 $1,525 

EMEA

  105  97  65  66  61 

Latin America

  40  29  20  16  14 

Asia

  57  54  2  2  2 
            

 $884 $969 $1,202 $1,433 $1,602 
            

Other repossessed assets(1)

 $76 $72 $78 $78 $81 
            

(1)
Primarily transportation equipment, carried at lower of cost or fair value, less costs to sell.

Table of Contents

        There is no industry-wide definition of non-performing assets. As such, analysis against the industry is not always comparable. The table below represents the Company's view of non-performing assets. As a general rule, unsecured consumer loans are charged off at 120 days past due and credit card loans are charged off at 180 days contractually past due. Consumer loans secured with non-real-estate collateral are written down to the estimated value of the collateral, less costs to sell, at 120 days past due. Consumer real-estate secured loans are written down to the estimated value of the property, less costs to sell, when they are 180 days contractually past due. Impaired corporate loans and leases are written down to the extent that principal is judged to be uncollectible.

Non-performing assets—Total Citigroup
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 1st Qtr.
2009
 4th Qtr.
2008
 3rd Qtr.
2008
 2nd Qtr.
2008
 

Corporate non-accrual loans

 $12,432 $11,207 $9,732 $2,739 $2,215 

Consumer non-accrual loans

  15,814  14,904  12,565  10,804  9,411 
            
 

Non-accrual loans (NAL)

 $28,246 $26,111 $22,297 $13,543 $11,626 
            

OREO

 $969 $1,202 $1,433 $1,602 $1,610 

Other repossessed assets

  72  78  78  81  94 
            
 

Non-performing assets (NPA)

 $29,287 $27,391 $23,808 $15,226 $13,330 
            

NAL as a % of total loans

  4.40% 3.97% 3.21% 1.89% 1.56%

NPA as a % of total assets

  1.59% 1.50% 1.23% 0.74% 0.63%

Allowance for loan losses as a % of NAL(1)

  127% 121% 133% 177% 179%
            
Non-accrual assets—Total Citigroup 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 1st Qtr.
2009
 4th Qtr.
2008
 3rd Qtr.
2008
 

Corporate non-accrual loans

 $14,776 $12,432 $11,207 $9,732 $2,739 

Consumer non-accrual loans

  17,908  15,814  14,904  12,565  10,804 
            
 

Non-accrual loans (NAL)

 $32,684 $28,246 $26,111 $22,297 $13,543 
            

OREO

 $884 $969 $1,202 $1,433 $1,602 

Other repossessed assets

  76  72  78  78  81 
            
 

Non-accrual assets (NAA)

 $33,644 $29,287 $27,391 $23,808 $15,226 
            

NAL as a % of total loans

  5.25% 4.40% 3.97% 3.21% 1.89%

NAA as a % of total assets

  1.78% 1.59% 1.50% 1.23% 0.74%

Allowance for loan losses as a % of NAL(1)

  111% 127% 121% 133% 177%
            

(1)
The $6.403 billion of non-accrual loans transferred from the held-for-sale portfolio to the held-for-investment portfolio during the fourth quarter of 2008 were marked to market at the transfer date and, therefore, no allowance was necessary at the time of the transfer. $2.426 billion of the par value of the loans reclassified was written off prior to transfer.
Non-performing assets—Total Citicorp
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 1st Qtr.
2009
 4th Qtr.
2008
 3rd Qtr.
2008
 2nd Qtr.
2008
 

Non-accrual loans (NAL)

 $5,314 $3,829 $3,193 $2,408 $2,438 

OREO

 $291 $307 $371 $425 $512 

Other repossessed assets

  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A 
            
 

Non-performing assets (NPA)

 $5,605 $4,136 $3,564 $2,833 $2,950 
            

NPA as a % of total assets

  0.57% 0.43% 0.36% 0.24% 0.25%

Allowance for loan losses as a % of NAL

  189% 223% 241% 276% 252%
            

Non-performing assets—Total Citi Holdings

                

Non-accrual loans (NAL)

 $22,932 $22,282 $19,104 $11,135 $9,188 

OREO

 $664  854  1,022  1,092  1,010 

Other repossessed assets

  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A 
            
 

Non-performing assets (NPA)

 $23,596 $23,136 $20,126 $12,227 $10,198 
            

NPA as a % of total assets

  3.64% 3.49% 2.81% 1.58% 1.22%

Allowance for loan losses as a % of NAL

  113% 104% 115% 156% 159%
            

Non-accrual assets—Total Citicorp 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 1st Qtr.
2009
 4th Qtr.
2008
 3rd Qtr.
2008
 

Non-accrual loans (NAL)

 $5,131 $5,314 $3,829 $3,193 $2,408 

OREO

  284  291  307  371  425 

Other repossessed assets

  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A 
            
 

Non-accrual assets (NAA)

 $5,415 $5,605 $4,136 $3,564 $2,833 
            

NAA as a % of total assets

  0.53% 0.57% 0.43% 0.36% 0.24%

Allowance for loan losses as a % of NAL

  200% 189% 223% 241% 276%
            

Non-accrual assets—Total Citi Holdings

                

Non-accrual loans (NAL)

 $27,553 $22,932 $22,282 $19,104 $11,135 

OREO

  585  664  854  1,022  1,092 

Other repossessed assets

  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A 
            
 

Non-accrual assets (NAA)

 $28,138 $23,596 $23,136 $20,126 $12,227 
            

NAA as a % of total assets

  4.56% 3.64% 3.49% 2.81% 1.58%

Allowance for loan losses as a % of NAL

  95% 113% 104% 115% 156%
            

N/A    Not available at the Citicorp or Citi Holdings level.


Table of Contents


Consumer Loan Details

Consumer Loan Delinquency Amounts, Net Credit Losses and Ratios
Table presents consumer credit information on a held basis.

 
 Total loans(1) 90 days or more past due(2)  
 Net credit losses(2) 
In millions of dollars, except total and average loan amounts in billions
 Sept.
2009
 Sept.
2009
 June
2009
 Sept.
2008
 Average loans(1)
3Q
2009
 3Q
2009
 2Q
2009
 3Q
2008
 

Citicorp

                         

Total

 $124.3 $1,909 $2,218 $1,634 $120.5 $1,426 $1,392 $1,096 
 

Ratio

     1.54% 1.89% 1.29%    4.70% 4.78% 3.35%

Retail Bank

                         
 

Total

  80.0  749  831  616  77.7  379  414  317 
  

Ratio

     0.94% 1.10% 0.77%    1.93% 2.22% 1.51%
 

North America

  7.5  93  97  54  7.4  79  86  35 
  

Ratio

     1.24% 1.35% 1.10%    4.23% 4.85% 3.03%
 

EMEA

  5.7  62  70  35  5.7  84  74  36 
  

Ratio

     1.09% 1.23% 0.48%    5.84% 5.34% 1.99%
 

Latin America

  17.7  324  360  323  16.9  113  140  147 
  

Ratio

     1.83% 2.18% 1.89%    2.65% 3.43% 3.29%
 

Asia

  49.1  270  304  204  47.7  103  114  99 
  

Ratio

     0.55% 0.66% 0.40%    0.85% 0.99% 0.73%

Citi-Branded Cards(3)

                         
 

Total

  44.3  1,160  1,387  1,018  42.8  1,047  978  779 
  

Ratio

     2.61% 3.29% 2.20%    9.71% 9.32% 6.58%
 

North America(4)

  12.4  241  248  118  11.3  201  219  109 
  

Ratio

     1.94% 2.21% 0.94%    7.06% 7.51% 3.67%
 

EMEA

  3.0  85  94  35  3.0  55  47  19 
  

Ratio

     2.83% 3.35% 1.12%    7.43% 6.70% 2.45%
 

Latin America

  11.9  519  695  603  11.9  543  472  493 
  

Ratio

     4.36% 5.89% 4.31%    18.05% 16.22% 13.16%
 

Asia

  17.0  315  350  262  16.6  248  240  158 
  

Ratio

     1.85% 2.15% 1.57%    5.93% 6.00% 3.63%

Citi Holdings—Local Consumer Lending

                         
 

Total

  310.8  18,538  16,486  11,294  319.6  4,929  5,156  3,487 
  

Ratio

     5.96% 5.10% 3.13%    6.12% 6.25% 3.83%
 

International

  37.3  1,447  1,535  1,033  39.5  973  976  737 
  

Ratio

     3.88% 3.81% 2.21%    9.77% 9.69% 6.02%
 

North America Retail Partners Cards(3)(4)

  21.7  885  917  810  23.7  867  872  646 
  

Ratio

     4.08% 4.06% 2.73%    14.51% 14.82% 8.80%
 

North America (excluding Cards)

  251.8  16,206  14,034  9,451  256.4  3,089  3,308  2,104 
  

Ratio

     6.44% 5.39% 3.33%    4.78% 4.98% 2.94%
                  

Total Citigroup (excluding Special Asset Pool)

 $435.1 $20,447 $18,704 $12,928 $440.1 $6,355 $6,548 $4,583 
  

Ratio

     4.70% 4.24% 2.66%    5.73% 5.87% 3.70%
                  

(1)
Total loans and average loans exclude interest and fees on credit cards.

(2)
The ratios of 90 days or more past due and net credit losses are calculated based on end-of-period loans and average loans, respectively, both net of unearned income.

(3)
The 90 days or more past due balance for Citi-branded cards and retail partners cards are generally still accruing interest. As discussed under "Loan Accounting Policies" above, the Company's policy is generally to accrue interest on credit card loans until 180 days past due, unless notification of bankruptcy filing has been received earlier.

(4)
In September 2009, the Citi-branded cards and retail partner cards businesses in North America changed their bankruptcy loss recognition practice from 10 days after receipt of notification of a cardmember's bankruptcy filing to 30 days after receipt of notification. The change was made to improve the accuracy in bankruptcy loss recognition and to closer align Citigroup's practices with industry norms. The effect of this change was not material.

Table of Contents


Consumer Loan Modification Programs

        The Company has instituted a variety of programs to assist borrowers with financial difficulties. These programs include modifying the original loan terms, reducing interest rates, extending the remaining loan duration and/or waiving a portion of the remaining principal balance. The Company's programs consist of the U.S. Treasury's Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP), as well as short-term forbearance and long-term modification programs, summarized below. The short and long-term programs are available to credit card, residential mortgage, personal installment, and auto borrowers both internationally and in the U.S.

        HAMP.    As of September 30, 2009, $5.7 billion of first mortgages, have been enrolled in HAMP, pending successful completion of a trial period (described below). The HAMP is designed to reduce monthly mortgage payments to a 31% housing debt ratio by lowering the interest rate, extending the term of the loan and forbearing principal of certain eligible borrowers who have defaulted on their mortgages or who are at risk of imminent default due to economic hardship. In order to be entitled to loan modifications, borrowers must complete a three- to five-month trial period, make the agreed payments and provide the required documentation before the end of the trial period. During the trial period, the original terms of the loans remain in effect pending final modification.

        Short-Term Programs.    Citigroup has also instituted programs to assist borrowers experiencing temporary hardships. These programs include short-term (twelve months or less) interest rate reductions and deferrals of past due payments. The loan volume under these short-term programs has increased significantly during 2009. As of September 30, 2009, short-term interest rate reduction programs covered loans in the residential mortgage ($7.4 billion), personal installment ($0.9 billion), credit card ($0.9 billion) and auto ($0.5 billion) businesses. Payment deferrals primarily occur in the U.S. residential mortgage business. Appropriate loan loss reserves have been established, giving consideration to the higher risk associated with those borrowers.

        Long-Term Programs.    Long-term modification programs, or "Troubled Debt Restructurings" (TDRs), occur when the terms of a loan have been modified due to the borrowers' financial difficulties and a long-term concession has been granted to the borrower. TDRs totaled $13.6 billion as of September 30, 2009. TDRs can be applied to credit card, residential mortgage, personal installment and auto loans. Valuation allowances for TDRs are determined by comparing estimated cash flows of the loans discounted at the loans' original contractual interest rates to the carrying value of the loans.


Table of Contents


U.S. Consumer Mortgage Lending

Overview

        The Company's U.S. consumer mortgage portfolio consists of both first lien and second lien mortgages, managed primarily by Local Consumer Lending (LCL) within Citi Holdings. However, $0.5 billion of first lien mortgages and $1.7 billion of second lien mortgages are reported in Citicorp. As of September 30, 2009, the U.S. first lien mortgage portfolio totaled approximately $122 billion while the U.S. second lien mortgage portfolio was approximately $53 billion.

        Data appearing throughout this report, including in the tables below, have been sourced from the Company's risk systems and, as such, may not reconcile with Citi's disclosures elsewhere generally due to differences in methodology and/or inconsistencies or variations in the manner in which information is captured. In addition, while the Company's risk management function continually reviews and refines its data capture and processing systems, certain Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) and loan-to-value (LTV) data on the Company's mortgage portfolio is not available. The Company has noted such variations or inabilities to capture data, as applicable, below where material.

        It is generally the Company's credit risk policy not to offer option ARMs/negative amortizing mortgage products to its customers. Option ARMs/negative amortizing mortgages represent a very insignificant portion of total balances that were acquired only incidentally as part of prior portfolio and business purchases.

        A portion of loans in the Company's U.S. mortgage portfolio currently requires a payment to satisfy only the current accrued interest for the payment period or an interest-only payment. The Company's mortgage portfolio includes approximately $30 billion of first and second lien home equity lines of credit (HELOCs) with the interest-only payment feature that are still within their revolving period and have not commenced amortization. The interest-only payment feature during the revolving period is standard for the HELOC product across the industry. The first mortgage portfolio also contains approximately $35 billion of mostly adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs) that are currently required to make an interest-only payment. These loans will be required to make a fully amortizing payment upon expiration of their interest-only payment period, and most will do so within a few years of origination. Borrowers that are currently required to make an interest only payment cannot select a lower payment that will negatively amortize the loan. First mortgage loans with the interest-only payment feature are primarily to high credit quality borrowers that have on average significantly higher refreshed FICO scores than other loans in the first mortgage portfolio.

Loan Balances

        First Mortgages—Loan Balances.    Approximately 83% of the Company's first lien mortgage portfolio had FICO credit scores of at least 620 at origination. As a consequence of the difficult economic environment and the decrease in housing prices, LTV ratios and FICO scores have deteriorated since originations, as depicted in the tables below. On a refreshed basis, approximately 31% of first lien mortgages had a FICO score below 620, compared to approximately 17% at origination.

Balances: September 30, 2009—First Lien Mortgages

At Origination
 FICO³660 620£FICO<660 FICO<620 

LTV£ 80%

  57% 5% 6%

80% < LTV < 90%

  3% 2% 4%

LTV³ 90%

  10% 6% 7%


Refreshed
 FICO³660 620£FICO<660 FICO£620 

LTV£ 80%

  29% 4% 11%

80% < LTV < 90%

  8% 1% 4%

LTV³ 90%

  23% 4% 16%

Note: First lien mortgage table excludes loans in Canada, Puerto Rico and loans sold with recourse. Balances exclude deferred fees/costs. Refreshed FICO scores based on updated credit scores obtained from Fair Isaac Corporation. Refreshed LTV ratios are derived from data at origination updated using mainly the Case-Shiller Home Price Index or the Federal Housing Finance Agency Price Index. Tables exclude $3.1 billion from At Origination balances and $2.6 billion from Refreshed balances for which FICO or LTV data was unavailable. The 90 or more days past due (90+DPD) delinquency rate for mortgages with unavailable FICO or LTV is 13.9% At Origination and 10.2% from Refreshed vs. 10.2% for total portfolio. Excluding government-insured loans, loans subject to long-term standby commitments and PMI loans described below, the 90+DPD delinquency rate for the first lien mortgage portfolio as of September 30, 2009 is 9.0%.

        The Company's first lien mortgage portfolio includes $4.8 billion of loans with Federal Housing Administration or Veterans Administration guarantees. These portfolios consist of loans originated to low-to-moderate-income borrowers with lower FICO scores and generally have higher LTVs. These loans have high delinquency rates (approximately 37% 90+DPD) but, given the guarantees, the Company has experienced negligible credit losses on these loans. The first lien mortgage portfolio also includes $2.4 billion of loans with LTVs above 80%, which have insurance through private mortgage insurance (PMI) companies, and $4.2 billion of loans subject to Long-Term Standby Commitments(1) with Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSE), for which the Company has limited exposure to credit losses.


(1)
A Long-Term Standby Commitment (LTSC) is a structured transaction in which the Company transfers the credit risk of certain eligible loans to an investor in exchange for a fee. These loans remain on balance sheet unless they reach a certain delinquency level (between 120 and 180 days), in which case the LTSC investor is required to buy the loan at par.

Table of Contents

        Second Mortgages—Loan Balances.    In the second lien mortgage portfolio, the majority of loans are in the higher FICO categories. However, the challenging economic conditions have created a migration towards lower FICO scores and higher LTV ratios. Approximately 61% of that portfolio had refreshed LTV ratios of 90% or more, compared to about 36% at origination. However, many of the loans in the portfolio are HELOC's, where the LTV ratio is calculated as if the line were fully drawn. As a majority of lines are only partially drawn, current LTVs on a drawn basis will be lower.

Balances: September 30, 2009—Second Lien Mortgages

At Origination
 FICO³660 620£FICO<660 FICO<620 

LTV£ 80%

  48% 2% 2%

80% < LTV < 90%

  10% 1% 1%

LTV³ 90%

  33% 2% 1%


Refreshed
 FICO³660 620£FICO<660 FICO<620 

LTV£ 80%

  22% 2% 3%

80% < LTV < 90%

  9% 1% 2%

LTV³ 90%

  44% 5% 12%

Note: Second lien mortgage table excludes loans in Canada and Puerto Rico. Refreshed FICO scores based on updated credit scores obtained from Fair Isaac Corporation. Refreshed LTV ratios are derived from data at origination updated using mainly the Case-Shiller Home Price Index or the Federal Housing Finance Agency Price Index. Tables exclude $1.8 billion from At Origination balances and $1.6 billion from Refreshed balances for which FICO or LTV data was unavailable. As of September 30, 2009, the 90+ DPD delinquency rate for mortgages with unavailable FICO or LTV is 3.8% At Origination and 7.1% from Refreshed vs. 3.1% for total portfolio.

        The second lien mortgage portfolio includes $1.8 billion of loans subject to LTSC with one of the GSE, hence limiting the Company's exposure to credit losses.

Delinquencies and Net Credit Losses

        The tables below provide delinquency statistics for loans 90+DPD, as a percentage of outstandings in each of the FICO/LTV combinations, in both the first lien and second lien mortgage portfolios. For example, loans with FICO³ 660 and LTV£ 80% at origination have a 90+DPD rate of 6.6%.

        As evidenced by the tables below, loans with FICO scores of less than 620 exhibit significantly higher delinquencies than in any other FICO band. Similarly, loans with LTVs equal to or greater than 90% have higher delinquencies than LTVs of less than 90%.

        In addition, the first mortgage delinquencies continued to rise during the third quarter. Further breakout of the FICO below 620 segment indicates that delinquencies in this segment, on a refreshed basis, are about three times higher than in the overall first mortgage portfolio.

Delinquencies: 90+DPD Rates—First Lien Mortgages

At Origination
 FICO³660 620£FICO<660 FICO<620 

LTV£ 80%

  6.6% 11.3% 13.5%

80%> < LTV < 90%

  7.9% 14.3% 17.8%

LTV³ 90%

  10.1% 17.6% 24.7%


Refreshed
 FICO³660 620£FICO<660 FICO<620 

LTV£ 80%

  0.2% 3.4% 17.8%

80%£ LTV < 90%

  0.5% 5.9% 24.7%

LTV³ 90%

  1.7% 13.7% 36.3%

Note: 90+DPD are based on balances referenced in the tables above.

Delinquencies: 90+DPD Rates—Second Lien Mortgages

At Origination
 FICO³660 620£FICO<660 FICO<620 

LTV£ 80%

  1.5% 4.0% 5.1%

80% < LTV < 90%

  3.3% 5.0% 5.8%

LTV³ 90%

  4.7% 5.6% 7.6%


Refreshed
 FICO³660 620£FICO<660 FICO<620 

LTV£ 80%

  0.0% 0.9% 8.3%

80% < LTV < 90%

  0.0% 0.7% 8.5%

LTV³ 90%

  0.3% 3.6% 18.1%

Note: 90+DPD are based on balances referenced in the tables above.

        The following charts detail the quarterly trends in delinquencies and net credit losses for the Company's first and second N.A. consumer mortgage portfolios.

        Both losses and delinquencies for the first mortgage portfolio have been impacted by the HAMP. As set forth in the first chart, first mortgage delinquencies continued to increase in the third quarter of 2009, exacerbated in part by the reduction in loan balances. However, the continued increase in first mortgage delinquencies during the third quarter 2009 is largely explained by the impact of HAMP. As mentioned elsewhere in this report, loans in the HAMP trial modification period are reported as delinquent if the original contractual payments are not received on time (even if the reduced payments agreed to under the program are made by the borrower).

        Further, HAMP impacted Citi's net credit losses in the first mortgage portfolio during the third quarter of 2009 as


Table of Contents

loans in the trial period are not charged off at 180 DPD as long as they have made at least one payment. Nearly half of the sequential decline in net credit losses on first mortgages during the third quarter 2009 was attributable to HAMP. The Company has increased its loan loss provisions to offset this impact.

        Based on these trends described above, the Company believes that the success rate of HAMP will be a key factor influencing net credit losses from delinquent first mortgage loans in the near future, and the outcome of the program will largely depend on the success rates of borrowers completing the trial period and meeting the documentation requirements.

        By contrast, during the third quarter of 2009, second mortgage delinquencies began to moderate, as did net credit losses, as compared to the prior quarter. The Company continues to actively manage this exposure by reducing the riskiest accounts, including by tightening credit requirements through higher FICOs, lower LTVs, increased documentation and verifications.

        It should be noted that first mortgage net credit losses, as a percentage of average loans, are nearly half the level of those in the second mortgage portfolio, despite much higher delinquencies in the first mortgage portfolio. The Company believes that two major factors explain this relationship:


Table of Contents

GRAPHIC

Note: Includes loans for Canada, Puerto Rico and loans held for sale. Balances include deferred fees/costs.

GRAPHIC

Note: Includes loans for Canada and Puerto Rico.

Origination Channel, Geographic Distribution and Origination Vintage

        The following tables detail the Company's first and second U.S. Consumer mortgage portfolios by origination channels, geographic distribution and origination vintage.

By Origination Channel

        The Company's U.S. consumer mortgage portfolio has been originated from three main channels: retail, broker and correspondent.


Table of Contents

First Lien Mortgages: September 30, 2009

CHANNEL
($ in billions)
 First Lien
Mortgages
 Channel
% Total
 90+DPD % *FICO < 620 *LTV³ 90 

Retail

 $50.5  41.5% 4.4%$14.6 $16.4 

Broker

 $21.0  17.3% 10.5%$4.2 $10.0 

Correspondent

 $50.2  41.2% 15.9%$18.6 $26.0 

*
Refreshed FICO and LTV.

Note: First lien mortgage table excludes Canada and Puerto Rico, deferred fees/costs and loans sold with recourse.

        As of September 30, 2009, approximately 41% of the first lien mortgage portfolio was originated through the correspondent channel, a reduction from approximately 43% as of the end of 2008. Given that loans originated through correspondents have exhibited higher 90+DPD delinquency rates than retail originated mortgages, the Company terminated business with a number of correspondent sellers in 2007 and 2008. During 2008, the Company severed relationships with a number of brokers, only maintaining those who have produced strong, high-quality and profitable volume.

Second Lien Mortgages: September 30, 2009

CHANNEL
($ in billions)
 Second Lien
Mortgages
 Channel
% Total
 90+DPD % *FICO < 620 *LTV³ 90 

Retail

 $27.0  50.8% 1.6%$3.9 $12.4 

Broker

 $13.2  24.9% 4.0%$2.2 $9.9 

Correspondent

 $12.9  24.3% 5.2%$3.1 $9.5 

*
Refreshed FICO and LTV.

Note: Excludes Canada and Puerto Rico.

        For second lien mortgages, approximately 49% of the loans were originated through third-party channels. As these mortgages have demonstrated a higher incidence of delinquencies, the Company no longer originates second mortgages through third-party channels, which represented approximately 54% of the portfolio as of the end of 2008.

By State

        Approximately half of the Company's U.S. consumer mortgage portfolio is located in five states: California, New York, Florida, Texas and Illinois. Those states represent 49% of first lien mortgages and 54% of second lien mortgages.

        Florida and Illinois have above average 90+DPD delinquency rates. Florida has 39% of its first mortgage lien portfolio in the FICO<620 band; and 66% of its loan portfolio has refreshed LTV³90. Illinois has 33% of its loans in the FICO<620 band; and 54% of its loan portfolio has LTV³90. Texas, despite having 44% of its portfolio with FICO<620, has a lower delinquency rate relative to the overall portfolio. Texas has only 8% of its loan portfolio with refreshed LTV³90.

First Lien Mortgages: September 30, 2009

STATES
($ in billions)
 First Lien
Mortgages
 State
% Total
 90+DPD % *FICO < 620 *LTV³ 90 

California

 $32.3  26.6% 9.0%$5.2 $18.3 

New York

 $10.0  8.2% 6.8%$2.0 $1.7 

Florida

 $7.3  6.0% 16.8%$2.8 $4.8 

Texas

 $5.3  4.3% 8.7%$2.3 $0.4 

Illinois

 $5.2  4.3% 11.4%$1.7 $2.8 

Others

 $61.7  50.7% 10.6%$23.4 $24.3 

*
Refreshed FICO and LTV.

Note: First lien mortgage table excludes Canada and Puerto Rico, deferred fees/costs and loans sold with recourse.

        In the second lien mortgage portfolio, Florida continues to experience above-average delinquencies, with approximately 81% of their loans with LTV³ 90 compared to 60% overall for second lien mortgages.

Second Lien Mortgages: September 30, 2009

STATES
($ in billions)
 Second Lien
Mortgages
 State
% Total
 90+DPD % *FICO < 620 *LTV³ 90 

California

 $14.6  27.4% 3.8%$2.0 $10.4 

New York

 $6.9  12.9% 1.9%$0.8 $2.2 

Florida

 $3.6  6.8% 5.2%$0.8 $2.9 

Illinois

 $2.1  3.9% 3.0%$0.4 $1.5 

Texas

 $1.5  2.8% 1.2%$0.2 $0.2 

Others

 $24.5  46.1% 2.8%$5.0 $14.5 

*
Refreshed FICO and LTV.

Note: Excludes Canada and Puerto Rico.


Table of Contents

By Vintage

        For the Company's combined U.S. consumer mortgage portfolio (first and second lien mortgages), approximately half of the portfolio consists of 2006 and 2007 vintages, which demonstrate above average delinquencies. In first mortgages, approximately 43% of the portfolio is of 2006 and 2007 vintages, which have 90+DPD rates well above the overall portfolio rate. In second mortgages, 64% of the portfolio is of 2006 and 2007 vintages, which again have higher delinquencies compared to the overall portfolio rate.

First Lien Mortgages: September 30, 2009

VINTAGES
($ in billions)
 First Lien
Mortgages
 Vintage
% Total
 90+DPD % *FICO < 620 *LTV³ 90 

2009

 $4.1  3.3% 0.3%$0.6 $0.9 

2008

 $15.1  12.4% 5.2%$3.3 $5.5 

2007

 $30.0  24.6% 15.8%$11.5 $18.7 

2006

 $22.2  18.2% 13.7%$7.6 $13.3 

2005

 $20.8  17.1% 7.5%$5.0 $9.6 

£ 2004

 $29.5  24.3% 7.7%$9.5 $4.5 

*
Refreshed FICO and LTV.

Note: First lien mortgage table excludes Canada and Puerto Rico, deferred fees/costs and loans sold with recourse.

Second Lien Mortgages: September 30, 2009

VINTAGES
($ in billions)
 Second Lien
Mortgages
 Vintage
% Total
 90+DPD % *FICO < 620 *LTV³ 90 

2009

 $0.5  0.9% 0.6%$0.0 $0.0 

2008

 $4.4  8.3% 0.9%$0.5 $1.5 

2007

 $16.0  30.0% 3.5%$3.0 $10.4 

2006

 $17.8  33.6% 3.8%$3.4 $12.9 

2005

 $10.1  18.9% 2.7%$1.5 $6.2 

£ 2004

 $4.4  8.3% 1.7%$0.7 $0.9 

*
Refreshed FICO and LTV.

Note: Excludes Canada and Puerto Rico.


N.A. Cards

        The Company's N.A. cards portfolio consists of its Citi-branded and retail partner cards portfolios located in Citicorp and Citi Holdings—Local Consumer Lending, respectively. As of September 30, 2009, the U.S. Citi-branded portfolio totaled approximately $84 billion while the U.S. retail partner cards portfolio was approximately $57 billion, both reported on a managed basis.

        In the Company's experience to date, these portfolios have significantly different characteristics:

        As set forth in the table below, on a refreshed basis approximately 73% of the Citi-branded portfolio had FICO credit scores of at least 660 as of September 30, 2009, while 62% of the retail partner cards portfolio had scores of at least 660.

Balances: September 30, 2009

Refreshed Citi Branded Retail Partners 

FICO³ 660

  73% 62%

620£FICO<660

  11% 13%

FICO<620

  16% 25%

Note: Based on balances of $138 billion. Balances include interest and fees. Excludes Canada, Puerto Rico, Installment and Classified portfolios. Excludes balances where FICO was unavailable ($0.9 billion for Citi-branded, $2.2 billion for retail partner cards). 90+DPD delinquency rate for balances where FICO was unavailable is 9.83% for Citi-branded and 9.38% for retail partner cards vs. overall rate of 2.63% for Citi-branded and 4.49% for retail partner cards.

        In each of the two portfolios, Citi has been actively eliminating riskier accounts and sales to mitigate losses. First, the Company has removed high risk customers from the portfolio by either reducing available lines of credit or closing accounts. End-of-period open accounts are down 16% in branded cards and 13% in retail partner cards versus prior year levels. Second, the Company has improved the tools used to identify and manage exposure in each of the portfolios by targeting unique customer attributes. Loss mitigation programs that entail a reduction in customers' monthly payments obligation constitutes less than 5% of the overall managed portfolio as of September 30, 2009. These programs along with other loss mitigation activities have stabilized reported delinquencies and net credit losses and importantly, early indicators of re-default rates related to these programs are within expected norms.


Table of Contents

        The table below provides delinquency statistics for loans 90+DPD for both the Citi-branded and retail partner cards portfolios as of September 30, 2009. Given the economic environment, customers have migrated down from higher FICO score ranges, driven by their delinquencies with Citi and/or with other creditors. As these customers roll through the delinquency buckets, they materially damage their credit score and may ultimately go to charge-off. Loans with FICO scores less than 620, which constitute 16% of the Citi-branded portfolio, have a 90+DPD rate of 15.2%; in the retail partner cards portfolio, loans with FICO scores less than 620 constitute 25% of the portfolio and have a 90+DPD rate of 16.8%.

90+DPD Delinquency Rate: September 30, 2009

Refreshed Citi Branded
90+DPD%
 Retail Partners
90+DPD%
 

FICO³ 660

  0.1% 0.2%

620£FICO<660

  0.3% 0.6%

FICO<620

  15.2% 16.8%

Note: Based on balances of $138 billion. Balances include interest and fees. Excludes Canada, Puerto Rico, Installment and Classified portfolios. Loans 90 days or more past due are more likely to be associated with low refreshed FICO scores both because low scores are indicative of repayment risk and because their delinquency has been reported by the Company to the credit bureaus.

        The following charts detail the quarterly trends in delinquencies and net credit losses for the Company's N.A. Citi-branded and retail partner cards portfolios.

        The Company believes that net credit losses in each of the cards portfolios will continue to remain at elevated levels and will continue to be highly dependent on the external environment and industry changes.


Table of Contents

GRAPHIC


Note: Includes Puerto Rico.

GRAPHIC


Note: Includes Canada and Puerto Rico.

The Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009

        On May 22, 2009, The Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 (CARD Act) was enacted into law. The CARD Act will affect various credit card practices of card issuers, including Citigroup, such as marketing, underwriting, pricing, billing and disclosure requirements, thus reshaping the way consumers have access to and use their credit cards. Currently, many of the provisions in the CARD Act are to take effect in February 2010, although some provisions were effective in August 2009 and some will take effect in August 2010. However, legislation has been introduced in Congress to accelerate certain provisions of the CARD Act.

        Certain provisions of the CARD Act are consistent with Citigroup's existing practices and will not require any changes or modifications. Other provisions, however, such as those that restrict the ability of an issuer to increase APRs on outstanding balances or that establish standards for penalty fees and payment allocation, will require Citigroup to make fundamental changes to its credit card business model. The impact of the CARD Act on Citigroup's credit businesses is not fully known at this time. The final impact will ultimately depend upon the successful implementation of changes to Citigroup's business model and the continued regulatory actions on and interpretations of the CARD Act, among other considerations.


Table of Contents


U.S. Installment and Other Revolving Loans

        In the table below, the Company's U.S. Installment portfolio consists of consumer loans in the following businesses: Consumer Finance, Retail Banking, Auto, Student Lending and Cards. Other Revolving consists of consumer loans (Ready Credit and Checking Plus products) in the Consumer Retail Banking business. Commercial-related loans are not included.

        As of September 30, 2009, the U.S. Installment portfolio totaled approximately $58 billion, while the U.S. Other Revolving portfolio was approximately $1 billion. While substantially all of the U.S. Installment portfolio is managed under LCL within Citi Holdings, it does include $0.4 billion of Consumer Retail Banking loans which are reported in Citicorp. The U.S. Other Revolving portfolio is managed under Citicorp. The U.S. Installment portfolio includes $21 billion of student loans originated under the Federal Family Education Loan Program where losses are substantially mitigated by federal guarantees if the loans are properly serviced.

        Approximately 44% of the Installment portfolio had FICO credit scores less than 620 on a refreshed basis. The Company continues to execute its strategy to wind down the assets in Citi Holdings. Approximately 29% of the Other Revolving portfolio is composed of loans having FICO less than 620.

Balances: September 30, 2009

Refreshed
 Installment Other Revolving 

FICO³ 660

  41% 56%

620£FICO<660

  15% 15%

FICO<620

  44% 29%

Note: Based on balances of $56 billion for Installment and $0.9 billion for Other Revolving. Excludes Canada and Puerto Rico. Excludes balances where FICO was unavailable ($2.3 billion for Installment, $0.1 billion for Other Revolving). 90+ DPD delinquency rate for balances where FICO was unavailable is 3.55% for Installment and 6.34% for Other Revolving vs. overall rate of 2.84% for Installment and 3.12% for Other Revolving.

        The table below provides delinquency statistics for loans 90+DPD for both the Installment and Other Revolving portfolios. On a refreshed basis, loans with FICO scores of less than 620 exhibit significantly higher delinquencies than in any other FICO band and will drive the majority of the losses.

90+DPD Delinquency Rate: September 30, 2009

Refreshed
 Installment
90+DPD%
 Other Revolving
90+DPD%
 

FICO³ 660

  0.1% 0.0%

620£FICO<660

  0.3% 0.4%

FICO<620

  6.2% 9.2%

Note: Based on balances of $56 billion for Installment and $0.9 billion for Other Revolving. Excludes Canada and Puerto Rico. Loans 90 days or more past due are more likely to be associated with low refreshed FICO scores both because low scores are indicative of repayment risk and because their delinquency has been reported by the Company to the credit bureaus.


Table of Contents


Corporate Loan Details

        For corporate clients and investment banking activities across Citigroup, the credit process is grounded in a series of fundamental policies, including:

Corporate Credit Portfolio

        The following table presents credit data for the Company's corporate loans and unfunded lending commitments at September 30, 2009:

 
 At September 30, 2009 
Corporate Loans(1)(in millions of dollars) Recorded Investment
in Loans(2)
 % of Total(3) Unfunded
Lending Commitments
 % of Total(3) 

Investment grade(4)

 $96,689  57%$275,556  88%

Non-investment grade(4)

             
 

Noncriticized

  21,010  12  14,268  5 
 

Criticized performing(5)

  36,803  22  20,384  6 
  

Commercial real estate (CRE)

  6,170  4  1,786  0 
  

Commercial & Industrial

  30,633  18  18,598  6 
 

Criticized non-performing(5)

  14,776  9  3,246  1 
  

Commercial real estate (CRE)

  3,783  3  913  0 
  

Commercial & Industrial

  10,993  6  2,333  1 
          

Total non-investment grade

 $72,589  43%$37,898  12%

Private Banking loans managed on a delinquency basis(4)(6)

  14,565     2,275    

Loans at fair value

  1,475         
          

Total Corporate Loans

 $185,318    $315,754    

Unearned income

  (4,598)        
          

Corporate Loans, net of unearned income

 $180,720    $315,754    
          

(1)
Includes $575 million of TDRs for which concessions, such as the reduction of interest rates or the deferral of interest or principal payments, have been granted as a result of deterioration in the borrowers' financial condition. Each of the borrowers is current under the restructured terms.

(2)
Recorded investment in a loan includes accrued interest, net deferred loan fees and costs, unamortized premium or discount, less any direct write-downs.

(3)
Percentages disclosed above exclude Private Banking loans managed on a delinquency basis and loans at fair value.

(4)
Held-for-investment loans accounted for on an amortized cost basis.

(5)
Criticized exposures corresponds to the Special Mention, Substandard and Doubtful asset categories defined by regulatory authorities.

(6)
Approximately $0.2 billion are 90+DPD.

Table of Contents

        The following tables represent the corporate credit portfolio (excluding Private Banking), before consideration of collateral, by maturity at September 30, 2009. The corporate portfolio is broken out by direct outstandings which include drawn loans, overdrafts, interbank placements, bankers' acceptances, certain investment securities and leases and unfunded commitments which include unused commitments to lend, letters of credit and financial guarantees.

 
 At September 30, 2009 
In billions of dollars Due
within
1 year
 Greater
than 1 year
but within
5 years
 Greater
than
5 years
 Total
exposure
 

Direct outstandings

 $158 $88 $8 $254 

Unfunded lending commitments

  182  126  9  317 
          

Total

 $340 $214 $17 $571 
          


 
 At December 31, 2008 
In billions of dollars Due
within
1 year
 Greater
than 1 year
but within
5 years
 Greater
than
5 years
 Total
exposure
 

Direct outstandings

 $161 $100 $9 $270 

Unfunded lending commitments

  206  141  12  359 
          

Total

 $367 $241 $21 $629 
          

Portfolio Mix

        The corporate credit portfolio (excluding Private Banking) is diverse across counterparty, industry and geography. The following table shows direct outstandings and unfunded commitments by region:

 
 September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

North America

  46% 48%

EMEA

  32  31 

Latin America

  9  8 

Asia

  13  13 
      

Total

  100% 100%
      

        The maintenance of accurate and consistent risk ratings across the corporate credit portfolio facilitates the comparison of credit exposure across all lines of business, geographic regions and products.

        Obligor risk ratings reflect an estimated probability of default for an obligor and are derived primarily through the use of statistical models (which are validated periodically), external rating agencies (under defined circumstances) or approved scoring methodologies. Facility risk ratings are assigned, using the obligor risk rating, and then factors that affect the loss-given default of the facility, such as support or collateral, are taken into account.

        Internal obligor ratings equivalent to BBB and above are considered investment grade. Ratings below the equivalent of the BBB category are considered non-investment grade.

        The following table presents the corporate credit portfolio (excluding Private Banking) by facility risk rating at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, as a percentage of the total portfolio:

 
 Direct outstandings and
unfunded commitments
 
 
 September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

AAA/AA/A

  54% 57%

BBB

  25  24 

BB/B

  13  13 

CCC or below

  8  6 

Unrated

     
      

Total

  100% 100%
      

        The corporate credit portfolio (excluding Private Banking) is diversified by industry, with a concentration only in the financial sector, including banks, other financial institutions, insurance companies, investment banks and government and central banks. The following table shows the allocation of direct outstandings and unfunded commitments to industries as a percentage of the total corporate portfolio:

 
 Direct outstandings and
unfunded commitments
 
 
 September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

Government and central banks

  14% 12%

Investment banks

  6  7 

Banks

  10  7 

Other financial institutions

  5  5 

Utilities

  5  5 

Insurance

  4  4 

Petroleum

  5  4 

Agriculture and food preparation

  5  4 

Telephone and cable

  3  3 

Industrial machinery and equipment

  3  3 

Global information technology

  2  3 

Chemicals

  3  3 

Other industries(1)

  35  40 
      

Total

  100% 100%
      

(1)
Includes all other industries, none of which exceeds 2% of total outstandings.

Table of Contents

Credit Risk Mitigation

        As part of its overall risk management activities, the Company uses credit derivatives and other risk mitigants to hedge portions of the credit risk in its portfolio, in addition to outright asset sales. The purpose of these transactions is to transfer credit risk to third parties. The results of the mark-to-market and any realized gains or losses on credit derivatives are reflected in thePrincipal transactions line on the Consolidated Statement of Income.

        At September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, $66.3 billion and $95.5 billion, respectively, of credit risk exposure were economically hedged. Citigroup's expected loss model used in the calculation of its loan loss reserve does not include the favorable impact of credit derivatives and other risk mitigants. In addition, the reported amounts of direct outstandings and unfunded commitments in this report do not reflect the impact of these hedging transactions. At September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the credit protection was economically hedging underlying credit exposure with the following risk rating distribution, respectively:

Rating of Hedged Exposure

 
 September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

AAA/AA/A

  45% 54%

BBB

  37  32 

BB/B

  11  9 

CCC or below

  7  5 
      

Total

  100% 100%
      

        At September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the credit protection was economically hedging underlying credit exposure with the following industry distribution, respectively:

Industry of Hedged Exposure

 
 September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

Utilities

  9% 10%

Telephone and cable

  8  9 

Agriculture and food preparation

  7  7 

Petroleum

  6  7 

Industrial machinery and equipment

  6  6 

Insurance

  4  5 

Chemicals

  7  5 

Retail

  4  5 

Other financial institutions

  4  4 

Autos

  5  4 

Pharmaceuticals

  5  4 

Natural gas distribution

  4  4 

Global information technology

  3  4 

Metals

  4  3 

Other industries(1)

  24  23 
      

Total

  100% 100%
      

(1)
Includes all other industries, none of which is greater than 2% of the total hedged amount.

Table of Contents


U.S. Subprime-Related Direct Exposure in Citi Holdings—Special Asset Pool

        The following table summarizes Citigroup's U.S. subprime-related direct exposures in Citi Holdings at JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and March 31,June 30, 2009:

In billions of dollars
 March 31, 2009
exposures
 Second
Quarter
2009
write-ups
(downs)(1)
 Second
Quarter
2009
Other(2)
 June 30, 2009
exposures
 

Direct ABS CDO super senior exposures:

             
 

Gross ABS CDO super senior exposures (A)

 $15.2       $14.5 
 

Hedged exposures (B)

  6.6        6.3 

Net ABS CDO super senior exposures:

             
 

ABCP/CDO(3)

  7.6 $0.6 $(0.9) 7.3 
 

High grade

  0.6  0.1  (0.1) 0.7 
 

Mezzanine

  0.3  (0.1)(4) 0.0  0.2 
          

Total net ABS CDO super senior exposures (A-B=C)

 $8.5 $0.6 $(0.9)(5)$8.3 
          

Lending and structuring exposures:

             
 

CDO warehousing/unsold tranches of ABS CDOs

 $0.0 $(0.0)$0.0 $0.0 
 

Subprime loans purchased for sale or securitization

  1.1  (0.0) (0.1) 1.0 
 

Financing transactions secured by subprime

  0.5  (0.0)(4) (0.2) 0.4 
          

Total lending and structuring exposures (D)

 $1.7 $(0.0)$(0.3)$1.4 
          

Total net exposures (C+D)(6)

 $10.2 $0.6 $(1.2)$9.6 
          

Credit adjustment on hedged counterparty exposures (E)(7)

    $0.2       
          

Total net write-ups (downs) (C+D+E)

    $0.8       
          

In billions of dollars
 June 30, 2009
exposures
 Third
Quarter
2009
write-ups
(downs)(1)
 Third Quarter
2009
Other(2)
 September 30, 2009
exposures
 

Direct ABS CDO super senior exposures:

             
 

Gross ABS CDO super senior exposures (A)

 $14.5       $15.1 
 

Hedged exposures (B)

  6.3        6.3 

Net ABS CDO super senior exposures:

             
 

ABCP/CDO(3)

  7.3 $1.6 $(1.3) 7.7 
 

High grade

  0.7  0.1    0.8 
 

Mezzanine

  0.2  0.2(4) (0.1) 0.3 
          

Total net ABS CDO super senior exposures (A-B=C)

 $8.3 $2.0 $(1.5)(4)$8.8 
          

Lending and structuring exposures (D)

 $1.4 $ $(0.1)$1.2 
          

Total net exposures (C+D)(5)(6)

 $9.6 $2.0 $(1.7)$10.0 
          

Credit adjustment on hedged counterparty exposures (E)(7)

    $(0.1)      
          

Total net write-ups (downs) (C+D+E)

    $1.9       
          

Note: Table may not foot or cross-foot due to roundings.

(1)
Includes net profits and losses associated with liquidations.

(2)
Reflects sales, transfers and repayment or liquidations of principal.

(3)
Consists of older-vintage, high-grade ABS CDOs.

(4)
Includes $7 million recorded in credit costs.

(5)
A portion of the underlying securities was purchased in liquidations of CDOs and reported asTrading account assets. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2009, $156$303 million relating to deals liquidated was held in the trading books.

(6)(5)
Composed of net CDO super-senior exposures and gross lending and structuring exposures.

(6)
These $10.0 billion in net direct exposures include the $8.0 billion of assets reflected in the table entitled "Assets within Special Asset Pool" under "Citi Holdings—Special Asset Pool" above.

(7)
SFAS 157 (ASC 820-10) adjustmentAdjustment related to counterparty credit risk.

        The CompanyCiti Holdings had approximately $9.6$10.0 billion in net U.S. subprime-related direct exposures in the Special Asset Pool at JuneSeptember 30, 2009. The exposure consisted of (a) approximately $8.3$8.8 billion of net exposures in the super senior tranches (i.e., the most senior tranches) of CDOs, which are collateralized by asset-backed securities, derivatives on asset-backed securities, or both (ABS CDOs), and (b) approximately $1.4$1.2 billion of exposures in its lending and structuring business.

        The Special Asset Pool also has trading positions, both long and short, in U.S. subprime RMBS and related products, including ABS CDOs, which are not included in the figures above. The exposure from these positions is actively managed and hedged, although the effectiveness of the hedging products used may vary with material changes in market conditions.

Direct ABS CDO Super Senior Exposures

        The net $8.3$8.8 billion in ABS CDO super senior exposures as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 is collateralized primarily by subprime residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS),RMBS, derivatives on RMBS, or both. These exposures include $7.3 billion in the super senior tranches of ABS CDOs initially issued as commercial paper (ABCP) and approximately $0.9 billion of other super senior tranches of ABS CDOs.

        Citigroup'sCiti Holdings' CDO super senior subprime direct exposures are Level 3 assets. The valuation of the high-grade and mezzanine ABS CDO positions uses trader prices based on the underlying assets of each high-grade and mezzanine ABS CDO. Unlike the ABCP- and CDO-squaredABCP positions, the high-grade and mezzanine positions are now largely hedged through the ABX and bond short positions, which are by necessity, trader priced. This results in closer symmetry in the way these long and short positions are valued by the Company. Citigroupbusiness. Citi Holdings intends to use trader marks to value this portion of the portfolio going forward so long as it remains largely hedged.

        The valuation of the ABCP- and CDO-squaredABCP positions areis subject to valuation based on significant unobservable inputs. Fair value of these exposures is based on estimates of future cash flows from the mortgage loans underlying the assets of the ABS CDOs. To determine the performance of the underlying mortgage loan portfolios, the Company estimates the prepayments, defaults and loss severities based on a number of macroeconomic factors, including housing price changes, unemployment rates, interest rates, and borrower and loan attributes, such as age, credit scores, documentation status, loan-to-value (LTV) ratios and debt-to-income (DTI) ratios.factors. The model is calibrated using available mortgage loan information including historical loan performance. In addition, the methodology estimates the impact of geographic concentration of mortgages and the impact of reported fraud in the origination of subprime mortgages. An appropriate discount rate is then applied to the cash flows generated for each ABCP- and CDO-squaredABCP tranche, in order to estimate its fair value under current market conditions.

        When necessary, the valuation methodology used by Citigroup is refined and the inputs used for purposes of estimation are modified, in part, to reflect ongoing market developments. More specifically, the inputs of home price appreciation (HPA) assumptions and delinquency data were updated along with discount rates that are based upon a weighted average combination of implied spreads from single-name ABS bond prices and ABX indices, as well as CLO spreads under current market conditions. The housing-price changes are estimated using a forward-looking projection, which incorporated the Loan Performance Index. In addition,


Table of Contents

the Company's mortgage default model also uses recent mortgage performance data, a period of sharp home price declines and high levels of mortgage foreclosures.

The valuation as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 assumes a cumulative decline in U.S. housing prices from peak to trough of 32.3%30.5%. This rate assumes declines of 10% and 3% in 2009 and flat for 2010, respectively, the remainder of the 32.3%30.5% decline having already occurred before the end of 2008.

        In addition, the discount rates were based on a weighted average combination of the implied spreads from single-name ABS bond prices, ABX indices and CLO spreads, depending on vintage and asset types. To determine the discount margin, the Company applies the mortgage default model to the bonds underlying the ABX indices and other referenced cash bonds and solves for the discount margin that produces the current market prices of those instruments.

        The primary drivers that currently impact the model valuations are the discount rates used to calculate the present value of projected cash flows and projected mortgage loan performance. In valuing its direct ABCP- and CDO-squared super senior exposures, the Company has made its best estimate of the key inputs that should be used in its valuation methodology. However, the size and nature of these positions as well as current market conditions are such that changes in inputs such as the discount rates used to calculate the present value of the cash flows can have a significant impact on the reported value of these exposures. For instance, eachEach 10 basis point change in the discount rate used generally results in an approximate $24$26 million change in the fair value of the Company's direct ABCP- and CDO-squared super seniorABCP exposures as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009. This applies to both decreases in the discount rate (which would increase the value of these assets and decrease reported write-downs) and increases in the discount rate (which would decrease the value of these assets and increase reported write-downs).

        Estimates of the fair value of the CDO super senior exposures depend on market conditions and are subject to further change over time. In addition, while Citigroup believes thatFor a further discussion of the valuation methodology and assumptions used to value thesedirect ABS CDO super senior exposures is reasonable,to U.S. Subprime Mortgages, see Note 17 to the methodology is subject to continuing refinement, including as a resultConsolidated Financial Statements, "Fair Value Measurement."


Table of market developments. Further, any observable transactions in respect of some or all of these exposures could be employed in the fair valuation process in accordance with and in the manner called for by SFAS 157 (ASC 820-10).Contents

Lending and Structuring Exposures

        The $1.4$1.2 billion of subprime-related exposures includes approximately $1.0$0.8 billion of actively managed subprime loans purchased for resale or securitization at a discount to par during 2007 and approximately $0.4 billion of financing transactions with customers secured by subprime collateral. These amounts represent thecollateral, and are carried at fair value as determined using observable inputs and other market data. The majority of the change from the March 31, 2009 balances reflects sales, transfers and liquidations.

        The Special Asset Pool also has trading positions, both long and short, in U.S. subprime RMBS and related products, including ABS CDOs, which are not included in the figures above. The exposure from these positions is actively managed and hedged, although the effectiveness of the hedging products used may vary with material changes in market conditions.value.


Exposure to Commercial Real Estate

        The Company,ICG and the Special Asset Pool, through itstheir business activities and as a capital markets participant, incursparticipants, incur exposures that are directly or indirectly tied to the commercial real estate market. These exposures are represented primarily by the following three categories:

        (1)   Assets held at fair value include: $5.1include approximately $5.7 billion, of which approximately $4.3$4.6 billion are securities, loans and other items linked to commercial real estate (CRE)CRE that are carried at fair value as trading account assets, $0.1and of which approximately $1.0 billion of loans which are held-for-sale, and approximately $0.7 billion which are securities backed by CRE carried at fair value as available-for-sale (AFS) investments. Changes in fair value for these trading account assets are reported in current earnings, while AFS investments are reported in OCI with other-than-temporary impairments reported in current earnings.

        The majority of these exposures are classified as Level 3 in the fair-value hierarchy. Weakening activity in the trading markets for some of these instruments resulted in reduced liquidity, thereby decreasing the observable inputs for such valuations, and could have an adverse impact on how these instruments are valued in the future if such conditions persist.

        (2)   Assets held at amortized cost include approximately $2.0$1.8 billion of securities classified as held-to-maturity (HTM)HTM and $24.0$22.8 billion of loans and commitments. The HTM securities were classified as such during the fourth quarter of 2008 and were previously classified as either trading or AFS. They are accounted for at amortized cost, subject to other-than-temporary impairment. Loans and commitments are recorded at amortized cost, less loan loss reserves. The impact from changes in credit is reflected in the calculation of the allowance for loan losses and in net credit losses.

        (3)   Equity and other investments include approximately $4.5$4.9 billion of equity and other investments such as limited partner fund investments which are accounted for under the equity method, which recognizes gains or losses based on the investor's share of the net income of the investee.


Table of Contents


Direct Exposure to Monolines

        Through Citi Holdings—Holdings has exposure, via the Special Asset Pool, the Company has exposure to various monoline bond insurers (Monolines), listed in the table below, from hedges on certain investments and from trading positions. The hedges are composed of credit default swaps and other hedge instruments. The CompanyCiti Holdings recorded a reduction of $157an additional $61 million in downward CVA related to exposure to Monolines during the secondthird quarter of 2009, bringing the total CVA balance to $5.2$5.3 billion.

        The following table summarizes the market value of the Company'sCiti Holdings' direct exposures to and the corresponding notional amounts of transactions with the various Monolines as well as the aggregate credit valuation adjustment associated with these exposures as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and March 31,June 30, 2009.

 
 June 30, 2009 March 31, 2009 
In millions of dollars Fair-
value
exposure
 Notional
amount
of
transactions
 Fair-
value
exposure
 Notional
amount
of
transactions
 

Direct subprime ABS CDO super senior—Ambac

 $4,525 $5,328 $4,649 $5,352 
          

Trading assets—non-subprime:

             

MBIA

 $2,123 $3,868 $2,209 $4,567 

FSA

  128  1,108  294  1,119 

Assured

  126  466  147  454 

Radian

  19  150  39  150 

Ambac

    407  19  821 
          

Subtotal trading assets—non-subprime

 $2,396 $5,999 $2,708 $7,111 
          

Total gross fair-value direct exposure

 $6,921    $7,357    

Credit valuation adjustment

  (5,213)    (5,370)   
          

Total net fair-value direct exposure

 $1,708    $1,987    
          

 
 September 30, 2009 June 30, 2009 
In millions of dollars
 Fair-value
exposure
 Notional
amount of
transactions
 Fair-value exposure Notional
amount of
transactions
 

Direct subprime ABS CDO super senior—Ambac

 $4,495 $5,295 $4,525 $5,328 
          

Trading assets—non-subprime:

             

MBIA

 $1,898 $3,871 $2,123 $3,868 

FSA

  74  847  128  1,108 

Assured

  80  458  126  466 

Radian

  8  150  19  150 

Ambac

    407    407 
          

Subtotal trading assets—non-subprime

 $2,061 $5,733 $2,396 $5,999 
          

Total gross fair-value direct exposure

 $6,556    $6,921    

Credit valuation adjustment

  (5,274)    (5,213)   
          

Total net fair-value direct exposure

 $1,282    $1,708    
          

        The fair-value exposure, net of payable and receivable positions, represents the market value of the contract as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and March 31,June 30, 2009, respectively, excluding the CVA. The notional amount of the transactions, including both long and short positions, is used as a reference value to calculate payments. The CVA is a downward adjustment to the fair-value exposure to a counterparty to reflect the counterparty's creditworthiness in respect of the obligations in question.

        Credit valuation adjustments are based on credit spreads and on estimates of the terms and timing of the payment obligations of the Monolines. Timing in turn depends on estimates of the performance of the transactions to which the Company's exposure relates, estimates of whether and when liquidation of such transactions may occur and other factors, each considered in the context of the terms of the Monolines' obligations.

        As of September 30, 2009 and June 30, 2009, and March 31, 2009, the CompanyCiti Holdings had $6.3 billion and $6.6 billion, respectively, in notional amount of hedges against its direct subprime ABS CDO super senior positions. Of those amounts, $5.3 billion and $5.4 billion, respectively, werewas purchased from Monolines and areis included in the notional amount of transactions in the table above.

        With respect to Citi'sCiti Holdings' trading assets, there were $2.4$2.1 billion and $2.7$2.4 billion of fair-value exposure to Monolines as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and March 31,June 30, 2009, respectively. Trading assets include trading positions, both long and short, in U.S. subprime RMBS and related products, including ABS CDOs.

        The notional amount of transactions related to the remaining non-subprime trading assets as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 was $6.0$5.7 billion. The $6.0Of the $5.7 billion, notional amount of transactions comprised $955 million primarily in interest-rate swaps with a corresponding fair value exposure of $2.1 million net payable. The remaining notional amount of $5.0 billion was in the form of credit default swaps and total return swaps with a fair value exposure of $2.4$2.1 billion. The remaining notional amount comprised $697 million primarily in interest-rate swaps with a corresponding fair value exposure of $9 million net payable.

        The notional amount of transactions related to the remaining non-subprime trading assets at March 31,June 30, 2009 was $7.1$6.0 billion with a corresponding fair value exposure of $2.7$2.4 billion. The $7.1Of the $6.0 billion, notional amount of transactions comprised $2.1 billion primarily in interest-rate swaps with a corresponding fair value exposure of $10 million. The remaining notional amount of $5.0 billion was in the form of credit default swaps and total return swaps with a fair value of $2.7$2.4 billion. The remaining notional amount comprised $955 million primarily in interest-rate swaps with a corresponding fair value exposure of $2.1 million net payable.

        The Company has purchased mortgage insurance from various monoline mortgage insurers on first mortgage loans. The notional amount of this insurance protection was approximately $316$243 million and $300$316 million as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and March 31,June 30, 2009, respectively, with nominal pending claims against this notional amount.

        In addition, Citigroup has indirect exposure to Monolines in various other parts of its businesses. Indirect exposure includes circumstances in which the Company is not a contractual counterparty to the Monolines, but instead owns securities which may benefit from embedded credit enhancements provided by a Monoline. For example, corporate or municipal bonds in the trading business may be insured by the Monolines. The previous table doesand discussion above do not capturereflect this type of indirect exposure to the Monolines.


Table of Contents


Highly Leveraged Financing Transactions

        Highly leveraged financing commitments are agreements that provide funding to a borrower with higher levels of debt (measured by the ratio of debt capital to equity capital of the borrower) than is generally the case for other companies. In recent years through mid-2008, highly leveraged financing had been commonly employed in corporate acquisitions, management buy-outs and similar transactions.

        In these financings, debt service (that is, principal and interest payments) absorbs a significant portion of the cash flows generated by the borrower's business. Consequently, the risk that the borrower may not be able to meet its debt obligations is greater. Due to this risk, the interest rates and fees charged for this type of financing are generally higher than for other types of financing.

        Prior to funding, highly leveraged financing commitments are assessed for impairment in accordance with SFAS 5 (ASC 450-20-25), and losses are recorded when they are probable and reasonably estimable. For the portion of loan commitments that relates to loans that will be held for investment, loss estimates are made based on the borrower's ability to repay the facility according to its contractual terms. For the portion of loan commitments that relates to loans that will be held-for-sale, loss estimates are made in reference to current conditions in the resale market (both interest rate risk and credit risk are considered in the estimate). Loan origination, commitment, underwriting and other fees are netted against any recorded losses.

        Citigroup generally manages the risk associated with highly leveraged financings it has entered into by seeking to sell a majority of its exposures to the market prior to or shortly after funding. In certain cases, all or a portion of a highly leveraged financing to be retained is hedged with credit derivatives or other hedging instruments. Thus, when a highly leveraged financing is funded, Citigroup records the resulting loan as follows:

        Due to the dislocation of the credit markets and the reduced market interest in higher-risk/higher-yield instruments since the latter half of 2007, liquidity in the market for highly leveraged financings has been limited. This has resulted in the Company's recording pretax write-downs on funded and unfunded highly leveraged finance exposures of $237$24 million in the secondthird quarter of 2009, bringing the cumulative write-downs for the first halfnine months of 2009 to $484$508 million.

        Citigroup's exposures to highly leveraged financing commitments totaled $8.5$6.2 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2009 ($8.15.9 billion funded and $0.4$0.3 billion in unfunded commitments), reflecting a decrease of $1.0$2.3 billion from March 31,June 30, 2009.

        In 2008, the Company completed the transfer of approximately $12.0 billion of loans to third parties, of which $8.5 billion relates to highly leveraged loan commitments. In these transactions, the third parties purchased subordinate interests backed by the transferred loans. These subordinate interests absorb first loss on the transferred loans and provide the third parties with control of the loans. The Company retained senior debt securities backed by the transferred loans. These transactions were accounted for as sales of the transferred loans. The loans were removed from the balance sheet and the retained securities are classified as AFS securities on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet.

        In addition, the Company purchased protection on the senior debt securities from the third-party subordinate interest holders via total return swaps (TRS). The counterparty credit risk in the TRS is protected through margin agreements that provide for both initial margin and additional margin at specified triggers. Due to the initial cash margin received, the existing margin requirements on the TRS, and the substantive subordinate investments made by third parties, the Company believes that the transactions largely mitigate the Company's risk related to the transferred loans.

        The Company's sole remaining exposure to the transferred loans are the senior debt securities, which have an amortized cost basis of $6.7$6.8 billion and fair value of $6.3$6.9 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2009, and the receivablespayables under the TRS, which have a fair value of $0.4$0.1 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2009. The change in the value of the retained senior debt securities that are classified as AFS securities are recorded in AOCI as they are deemed temporary. The offsetting change in the TRS are recorded as cash flow hedges within AOCI. See Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.


Table of Contents


DERIVATIVES

        Presented below are the notional and the mark-to-market receivables and payables for Citigroup's derivative exposures as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:

Notionals(1)

 
 Trading
derivatives(2)(3)
 Non-trading
Derivatives(3)
 
In millions of dollars June 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 June 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

Interest rate contracts

             
 

Swaps

 $15,307,390 $15,096,293 $303,754 $306,501 
 

Futures and forwards

  3,724,252  2,619,952  101,832  118,440 
 

Written options

  3,063,580  2,963,280  18,850  20,255 
 

Purchased options

  3,227,193  3,067,443  50,726  38,344 
          

Total interest rate contract notionals

 $25,322,415 $23,746,968 $475,162 $483,540 
          

Foreign exchange contracts

             
 

Swaps

 $914,889 $882,327 $55,642 $62,491 
 

Futures and forwards

  2,042,436  2,165,377  32,399  40,694 
 

Written options

  435,498  483,036  6,473  3,286 
 

Purchased options

  453,971  539,164  474  676 
          

Total foreign exchange contract notionals

 $3,846,794 $4,069,904 $94,988 $107,147 
          

Equity contracts

             
 

Swaps

 $90,794 $98,315 $ $ 
 

Futures and forwards

  13,557  17,390     
 

Written options

  463,668  507,327     
 

Purchased options

  442,601  471,532     
          

Total equity contract notionals

 $1,010,620 $1,094,564 $ $ 
          

Commodity and other contracts

             
 

Swaps

 $27,451 $44,020 $ $ 
 

Futures and forwards

  84,905  60,625     
 

Written options

  30,663  31,395     
 

Purchased options

  30,254  32,892     
          

Total commodity and other contract notionals

 $173,273 $168,932 $ $ 
          

Credit derivatives(4)

             
 

Citigroup as the Guarantor:

             
  

Credit default swaps

 $1,363,683 $1,441,117 $ $ 
  

Total return swaps

  1,950  1,905     
  

Credit default options

  55  258     
 

Citigroup as the Beneficiary:

            
  

Credit default swaps

  1,450,451  1,560,087     
  

Total return swaps

  22,997  27,359  6,668  8,103 
  

Credit default options

  150  135     
          

Total credit derivatives

 $2,839,286 $3,030,861 $6,668 $8,103 
          

Total derivative notionals

 $33,192,388 $32,111,229 $576,818 $598,790 
          

See the following page for footnotesNote 16 to this table.

[Table continues on the following page.]


Table of Contents


Mark-to-Market (MTM) Receivables/Payables

 
 Derivatives
receivables—MTM
 Derivatives
payables—MTM
 
In millions of dollars June 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 June 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

Trading derivatives(2)

             
 

Interest rate contracts

 $486,623 $667,597 $466,686 $654,178 
 

Foreign exchange contracts

  87,813  153,197  92,241  160,628 
 

Equity contracts

  24,444  35,717  45,070  57,292 
 

Commodity and other contracts

  21,331  23,924  20,447  22,473 
 

Credit derivatives:(4)

             
  

Citigroup as the Guarantor

  16,191  5,890  117,127  198,233 
  

Citigroup as the Beneficiary

  134,467  222,461  16,217  5,476 
 

Cash collateral paid/received

  55,356  63,866  51,227  65,010 
          

Total

 $826,225 $1,172,652 $809,015 $1,163,290 
          
 

Less: Netting agreements and market value adjustments

  (753,067) (1,057,363) (745,467) (1,046,505)
          

Net receivables/payables

 $73,158 $115,289 $63,548 $116,785 
          

Non-trading derivatives

             
 

Interest rate contracts

 $7,847 $14,755 $7,019 $7,742 
 

Foreign exchange contracts

  3,398  2,408  4,006  3,746 
 

Credit Derivatives

  370       
          

Total

 $11,615 $17,163 $11,025 $11,488 
          

(1)
Includes the notional amounts for long and short derivative positions. The notional amounts are presented based on the derivatives classification on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

(2)
Trading Derivatives include proprietary positions, as well as hedging derivatives instruments that do not qualifyFinancial Statements for hedge accounting in accordance with SFAS No. 133,"Accounting for Derivative Instrumentsa discussion and Hedging Activities" (SFAS 133/ASC 815).

(3)
Reclassified to conformdisclosures related to the current period's presentation.

(4)
Company's Derivative activities. The following discussions relate to the Fair Valuation Adjustment for Derivatives and Credit Derivatives are arrangements designed to allow one party (the "beneficiary") to transfer the credit risk of a "reference asset" to another party (the "guarantor"). These arrangements allow a guarantor to assume the credit risk associated with the reference assets without directly purchasing it. The Company has entered into credit derivatives positions for purposes such as risk management, yield enhancement, reduction of credit concentrations, and diversification of overall risk.
activities.

Fair Valuation Adjustments for Derivatives

        The fair value adjustments applied by the Company to its derivative carrying values consist of the following items:

        The Company's CVA methodology comprises two steps. First, the exposure profile for each counterparty is determined using the terms of all individual derivative positions and a Monte Carlo simulation or other quantitative analysis to generate a series of expected cash flows at future points in time. The calculation of this exposure profile considers the effect of credit risk mitigants, including pledged cash or other collateral and any legal right of offset that exists with a counterparty through arrangements such as netting agreements. Individual derivative contracts that are subject to an enforceable master netting agreement with a counterparty are aggregated for this purpose, since it is those aggregate net cash flows that are subject to nonperformance risk. This process identifies specific, point in time future cash flows that are subject to nonperformance risk, rather than using the current recognized net asset or liability as a basis to measure the CVA.

        Second, market-based views of default probabilities derived from observed credit spreads in the credit default swap market, are applied to the expected future cash flows determined in step one. Own-credit CVA is determined using Citi-specific CDS spreads for the relevant tenor. Generally, counterparty CVA is determined using CDS spread indices for each credit rating and tenor. For certain identified facilities where individual analysis is practicable (for example, exposures to monoline counterparties) counterparty-specific CDS spreads are used.

        The CVA adjustment is designed to incorporate a market view of the credit risk inherent in the derivative portfolio as required by SFAS 157 (ASC 820-10).portfolio. However, most derivative instruments are negotiated bilateral contracts and are not commonly transferred to third parties. Derivative instruments are normally settled contractually, or if terminated early, are terminated at a value negotiated bilaterally between the counterparties. Therefore, the CVA (both counterparty and own-credit) may not be realized upon a settlement or termination in the normal course of business.

        In addition, all or a portion of the credit valuation adjustmentsCVA may be reversed or otherwise adjusted in future periods in the event of changes in the credit risk of Citi or its counterparties, or changes in the credit mitigants (collateral and netting agreements) associated with the derivative instruments. Historically, Citigroup's credit spreads have moved in tandem


Table of Contents

with general counterparty credit spreads, thus providing offsetting CVAs affecting revenue. However, in the first quarter of 2009, Citigroup's credit spreads widened and counterparty credit spreads generally narrowed, each of which positively affected revenues. Conversely, in the second and third quarters of 2009, Citigroup's credit spreads narrowed and negatively affected revenues.

        The table below summarizes pretax gains (losses) related to changes in CVAs on derivative instruments for the quarters ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008:2008, respectively:

 
 Credit valuation
adjustment gain
(loss)
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

Non-monoline counterparties

 $4,381 $405 

Citigroup (own)

  (2,980) (299)
      

Net non-monoline CVA

 $1,401 $106 

Monoline counterparties

  157  (2,428)
      

Total CVA—derivative instruments

 $1,558 $(2,322)
      

 
 Credit valuation
adjustment gain (loss)
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

Non-monoline counterparties

 $855 $(851)

Citigroup (own)

  (1,534) 1,951 
      

Net non-monoline CVA

 $(679)$1,100 

Monoline counterparties

  (61) (920)
      

Total CVA—derivative instruments

 $(740)$180 
      

        The table below summarizes pretax gains (losses) related to changes in CVAs on derivative instruments for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008:2008, respectively:

 
 Credit valuation
adjustment gain
(loss)
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

Non-monoline counterparties

 $4,533 $(1,385)

Citigroup (own)

  (357) 1,214 
      

Net non-monoline CVA

 $4,176 $(171)

Monoline counterparties

  (934) (3,919)
      

Total CVA—derivative instruments

 $3,242 $(4,090)
      

 
 Credit valuation
adjustment gain (loss)
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

Non-monoline counterparties

 $5,387 $(2,236)

Citigroup (own)

  (1,891) 3,165 
      

Net non-monoline CVA

 $3,496 $929 

Monoline counterparties

  (995) (4,839)
      

Total CVA—derivative instruments

 $2,501 $(3,910)
      

        The table below summarizes the CVA applied to the fair value of derivative instruments as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.2008, respectively.

 
 Credit valuation adjustment
Contra liability
(contra asset)
 
In millions of dollars June 30, 2009 December 31, 2008 

Non-monoline counterparties

 $(3,733)$(8,266)

Citigroup (own)

  3,289  3,611 
      

Net non-monoline CVA

 $(444)$(4,655)

Monoline counterparties

  (5,213) (4,279)
      

Total CVA—derivative instruments

 $(5,657)$(8,934)
      

 
 Credit valuation adjustment
Contra liability (contra asset)
 
In millions of dollars September 30, 2009 December 31, 2008 

Non-monoline counterparties

 $(2,878)$(8,266)

Citigroup (own)

  1,754  3,611 
      

Net non-monoline CVA

 $(1,124)$(4,655)

Monoline counterparties

  (5,274) (4,279)
      

Total CVA—derivative instruments

 $(6,398)$(8,934)
      

        The CVA amounts shown above relate solely to the derivative portfolio, and do not include:


Table of Contents

Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

Credit Derivatives

        The Company makes markets in and trades a range of credit derivatives, both on behalf of clients as well as for its own account. Through these contracts the Company either purchases or writes protection on either a single-name or portfolio basis. The Company uses credit derivatives to help mitigate credit risk in its corporate loan portfolio and other cash positions, to take proprietary trading positions, and to facilitate client transactions.

        Credit derivatives generally require that the seller of credit protection make payments to the buyer upon the occurrence of pre-defined events (settlement triggers). These settlement triggers are defined by the form of the derivative and the referenced credit and are generally limited to the market standard of failure to pay on indebtedness and bankruptcy (or comparable events) of the reference credit and, in a more limited range of transactions, debt restructuring.

        Credit derivative transactions referring to emerging market reference credits will also typically include additional settlement triggers to cover the acceleration of indebtedness and the risk of repudiation or a payment moratorium. In certain transactions on a portfolio of referenced credits or asset-backed securities, the seller of protection may not be required to make payment until a specified amount of losses has occurred with respect to the portfolio and/or may only be required to pay for losses up to a specified amount.


Table of Contents

        The following tables summarize the key characteristics of the Company's credit derivative portfolio by activity, counterparty and derivative forminstrument as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:2008, respectively:

JuneSeptember 30, 2009:

 
 Fair values Notionals 
In millions of dollars Receivable Payable Beneficiary Guarantor 

By Activity:

             

Credit portfolio

 $1,391 $164 $52,135 $ 

Dealer/client

  149,637  133,180  1,428,131  1,365,688 
          

Total by Activity

 $151,028 $133,344 $1,480,266 $1,365,688 
          

By Industry/Counterparty:

             

Bank

 $83,725 $82,057 $936,852 $899,598 

Broker-dealer

  35,842  33,912  339,239  322,349 

Monoline

  7,007  89  9,925  123 

Non-financial

  291  262  3,780  4,805 

Insurance and other financial institutions

  24,163  17,024  190,470  138,813 
          

Total by Industry/Counterparty

 $151,028 $133,344 $1,480,266 $1,365,688 
          

By Instrument:

             

Credit default swaps and options

 $147,947 $132,288 $1,450,601 $1,363,738 

Total return swaps and other

  3,081  1,056  29,665  1,950 
          

Total by Instrument

 $151,028 $133,344 $1,480,266 $1,365,688 
          

 
 Fair values Notionals 
In millions of dollars Receivable Payable Beneficiary Guarantor 

By Industry/Counterparty:

             

Bank

 $62,785 $61,679 $914,418 $860,437 

Broker-dealer

  23,425  22,323  321,199  301,216 

Monoline

  6,572  1  8,299   

Non-financial

  181  193  3,405  2,127 

Insurance and other financial institutions

  19,264  16,379  202,054  151,326 
          

Total by Industry/Counterparty

 $112,227 $100,575 $1,449,375 $1,315,106 
          

By Instrument:

             

Credit default swaps and options

 $107,770 $99,376 $1,418,691 $1,314,282 

Total return swaps

  4,457  1,199  30,684  824 
          

Total by Instrument

 $112,227 $100,575 $1,449,375 $1,315,106 
          


December 31, 2008(1):

 
 Fair values Notionals 
In millions of dollars Receivable Payable Beneficiary Guarantor 

By Activity:

             

Credit portfolio

 $3,257 $15 $71,131 $ 

Dealer/client

  225,094  203,694  1,524,553  1,443,280 
          

Total by Activity

 $228,351 $203,709 $1,595,684 $1,443,280 
          

By Industry/Counterparty:

             

Bank

 $128,042 $121,811 $996,248 $943,949 

Broker-dealer

  59,321  56,858  403,501  365,664 

Monoline

  6,886  91  9,973  139 

Non-financial

  4,874  2,561  5,608  7,540 

Insurance and other financial institutions

  29,228  22,388  180,354  125,988 
          

Total by Industry/Counterparty

 $228,351 $203,709 $1,595,684 $1,443,280 
          

By Instrument:

             

Credit default swaps and options

 $221,159 $203,220 $1,560,222 $1,441,375 

Total return swaps and other

  7,192  489  35,462  1,905 
          

Total by Instrument

 $228,351 $203,709 $1,595,684 $1,443,280 
          

 
 Fair values Notionals 
In millions of dollars Receivable Payable Beneficiary Guarantor 

By Industry/Counterparty:

             

Bank

 $128,042 $121,811 $996,248 $943,949 

Broker-dealer

  59,321  56,858  403,501  365,664 

Monoline

  6,886  91  9,973  139 

Non-financial

  4,874  2,561  5,608  7,540 

Insurance and other financial institutions

  29,228  22,388  180,354  125,988 
          

Total by Industry/Counterparty

 $228,351 $203,709 $1,595,684 $1,443,280 
          

By Instrument:

             

Credit default swaps and options

 $221,159 $203,220 $1,560,222 $1,441,375 

Total return swaps

  7,192  489  35,462  1,905 
          

Total by Instrument

 $228,351 $203,709 $1,595,684 $1,443,280 
          

(1)
Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.

        The fair values shown are prior to the application of any netting agreements, cash collateral, and market or credit value adjustments.

        The Company actively participates in trading a variety of credit derivatives products as both an active two-way market-maker for clients and to manage credit risk. The majority of this activity was transacted with other financial intermediaries, including both banks and broker-dealers. The Company generally has a mismatch between the total notional amounts of protection purchased and sold and it may hold the reference assets directly, rather than entering into offsetting credit derivative contracts as and when desired. The open risk exposures from credit derivative contracts are largely matched after certain cash positions in reference assets are considered and after notional amounts are adjusted, either to a duration-based equivalent basis or to reflect the level of subordination in tranched structures.

        The Company actively monitors its counterparty credit risk in credit derivative contracts. Approximately 88%87% of the gross receivables as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 are from counterparties with which the Company maintains collateral agreements. A majority of the Company's top 15 counterparties (by receivable balance owed to the Company) are banks, financial institutions or other dealers. Contracts with these counterparties do not include ratings-based termination events. However, counterparty rating downgrades may have an incremental effect by lowering the threshold at which the Company may call for additional collateral. A number of the remaining significant counterparties are monolines.


Table of Contents


MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESS

        Market risk encompasses liquidity risk and price risk, both of which arise in the normal course of business of a global financial intermediary. Liquidity risk is the risk that an entity may be unable to meet a financial commitment to a customer, creditor, or investor when due. Liquidity risk is discussed in "Capital Resources and Liquidity" below. Price risk is the earnings risk from changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity and commodity prices, and in their implied volatilities. Price risk arises in non-trading portfolios, as well as in trading portfolios.

Interest Rate Exposure (IRE)

        The exposures in the following table represent the approximate annualized risk to Net Interest Revenue (NIR) assuming an unanticipated parallel instantaneous 100bp100 basis points change, as well as a more gradual 100bp (25bps100 basis points (25 basis points per quarter) parallel change in rates as compared with the market forward interest rates in selected currencies.

 
 June 30, 2009 March 31, 2009 June 30, 2008 
In millions of dollars Increase Decrease Increase Decrease Increase Decrease 

U.S. dollar

                   

Instantaneous change

 $(1,767)$1,935 $(1,654)$1,543 $(1,236)$1,170 

Gradual change

 $(1,005)$936 $(888)$660 $(756)$633 
              

Mexican peso

                   

Instantaneous change

 $(21)$21 $(20)$20 $(24)$24 

Gradual change

 $(15)$15 $(14)$14 $(19)$19 
              

Euro

                   

Instantaneous change

 $(29)$21 $11 $(12)$(71)$71 

Gradual change

 $(35)$35 $12 $(12)$(51)$51 
              

Japanese yen

                   

Instantaneous change

 $215  NM $195  NM $131  NM 

Gradual change

 $122  NM $122  NM $73  NM 
              

Pound sterling

                   

Instantaneous change

 $(11)$11 $1 $(5)$13 $(13)

Gradual change

 $(14)$14 $(1)$1 $15 $(15)
              

 
 September 30, 2009 June 30, 2009 September 30, 2008 
In millions of dollars Increase Decrease Increase Decrease Increase Decrease 

U.S. dollar

                   

Instantaneous change

 $(1,193)$1,427 $(1,767)$1,935 $(1,811)$893 

Gradual change

 $(563)$526 $(1,005)$936 $(707)$490 
              

Mexican peso

                   

Instantaneous change

 $25 $(25)$(21)$21 $(23)$23 

Gradual change

 $11 $(11)$(15)$15 $(19)$19 
              

Euro

                   

Instantaneous change

 $52 $(4)$(29)$21 $(52)$52 

Gradual change

 $12 $(12)$(35)$35 $(41)$41 
              

Japanese yen

                   

Instantaneous change

 $228  NM $215  NM $142  NM 

Gradual change

 $135  NM $122  NM $72  NM 
              

Pound sterling

                   

Instantaneous change

 $(11)$24 $(11)$11 $16 $(16)

Gradual change

 $(11)$11 $(14)$14 $13 $(13)
              

NM    Not meaningful. A 100 basis point decrease in interest rates would imply negative rates for the Japanese yen yield curve.

        The changes in the U.S. dollar interest rate exposures from March 31,June 30, 2009 to JuneSeptember 30, 2009 are related to customer-related asset and liability mix, the impact of the Morgan Stanley Smith Barney joint venture,term debt issuance, as well as Citigroup's view of prevailing interest rates.

        Certain risk positions in the non-trading portfolio are economically hedged with offsetting positions in the mark-to-market portfolio, which are reflected in the Value at Risk metrics. If the effect of these hedging transactions were netted against the non-trading portfolio it would reduce Citi's risk from an instantaneous parallel increase in rates from ($1,193) million to ($569) million and decrease Citi's opportunity from an instantaneous parallel decrease in rates from $1,427 million to $803 million.

        The following table shows the risk to NIR from six different changes in the implied forward rates. Each scenario assumes that the rate change will occur on a gradual basis every three months over the course of one year.

 
 Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4 Scenario 5 Scenario 6 

Overnight rate change (bp)

    100  200  (200) (100)  

10-year rate change (bp)

  (100)   100  (100)   100 

Impact to net interest revenue(in millions of dollars)

 
$

1
 
$

(853

)

$

(1,711

)

$

686
 
$

812
 
$

(89

)
              

 
 Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4 Scenario 5 Scenario 6 

Overnight rate change (bp)

    100  200  (200) (100)  

10-year rate change (bp)

  (100)   100  (100)   100 

Impact to net interest revenue
(in millions of dollars)

 
$

8
 
$

(514

)

$

(1,131

)

$

62
 
$

269
 
$

(61

)
              

Table of Contents

Value at Risk

        For Citigroup's major trading centers, the aggregate pretax value at risk (VAR) in the trading portfolios was $273 million, $277 million, $292$319 million and $255$237 million at September 30, 2009, June 30, 2009, MarchDecember 31, 2009,2008 and JuneSeptember 30, 2008, respectively. Daily exposuresCitigroup trading VAR averaged $260$281 million and ranged from $247 million to $312 million during the secondthird quarter of 2009 and ranged from $224 million to $290 million.2009. The following table summarizes VAR tofor Citigroup trading portfolios at September 30, 2009, June 30, 2009, MarchDecember 31, 2009,2008 and JuneSeptember 30, 2008, including the total VAR, the specific risk only component of VAR, and general market factors only VAR,factor VAR's, along with the quarterly averages:

In million of dollars June 30,
2009
 Second Quarter
2009 Average
 March 31,
2009
 First Quarter
2009 Average
 June 30,
2008
 Second Quarter
2008 Average
 
Interest rate $226 $217 $239 $272 $288 $301 
Foreign exchange  84  61  38  73  47  49 
Equity  65  94  144  97  95  79 
Commodity  36  38  34  22  45  51 
Diversification benefit  (134) (150) (163) (173) (220) (188)
              
Total—All market risk factors, including general and specific risk $277 $260 $292 $291 $255 $292 
              
Specific risk only component $18 $20 $14 $19 $15 $7 
              
Total—General market factors only $259 $240 $278 $272 $240 $285 
              

In million of dollars September 30,
2009
 Third
Quarter
2009
Average
 June 30,
2009
 Second
Quarter
2009
Average
 December 31,
2008
 Fourth
Quarter
2008
Average
 September 30,
2008
 Third
Quarter
2008
Average
 

Interest rate

 $240 $237 $226 $217 $320 $272 $240 $265 

Foreign exchange

  98  90  84  61  118  80  40  43 

Equity

  51  62  65  94  84  94  106  99 

Commodity

  41  38  36  38  15  16  20  20 

Diversification benefit

  (157) (146) (134) (150) (218) (167) (169) (187)
                  

Total—All market risk factors, including general and specific risk

 $273 $281 $277 $260 $319 $295 $237 $240 
                  

Specific risk only component

 $12 $17 $18 $20 $8  25 $20 $14 
                  

Total—General market factors only

 $261 $264 $259 $240 $311 $270 $217 $226 
                  

        The specific risk only component represents the level of equity and debt issuer-specific risk embedded in VAR. Citigroup's specific risk model conforms to the 4x-multiplier treatment and is subject to extensive annual hypothetical back-testing.

        The table below provides the range of VAR in each typemarket factor VARs, inclusive of trading portfolio that was experienced duringspecific risk, across the quarters ended:

 
 June 30, 2009 March 31, 2009 June 30, 2008 
In millions of dollars Low High Low High Low High 

Interest rate

 $193 $240 $209 $320 $268 $339 

Foreign exchange

  31  91  29  140  33  81 

Equity

  50  153  47  167  63  181 

Commodity

  26  50  12  34  40  60 
              

 
 September 30,
2009
 June 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 September 30,
2008
 
In millions of dollars Low High Low High Low High Low High 

Interest rate

 $218 $260 $193 $240 $227 $328 $239 $292 

Foreign exchange

  55  110  31  91  43  130  28  71 

Equity

  51  95  50  153  68  122  80  134 

Commodity

  32  45  26  50  12  22  12  46 
                  

        The following table provides the VAR for Citicorp's Securities and Banking business for the second and third quarters of 2009:

In millions of dollars September 30,
2009
 June 30,
2009
 

Total—All market risk factors, including general and specific risk

 $168 $213 
      

Average—during quarter

  184  186 

High—during quarter

  247  214 

Low—during quarter

  148  148 
      

Table of Contents


OPERATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESS

        Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, systems or human factors, or from external events. It includes the reputation and franchise risk associated with business practices or market conduct in which the Company is involved. Operational risk is inherent in Citigroup's global business activities and, as with other risk types, is managed through an overall framework designed to balance strong corporate oversight with well-defined independent risk management. This framework includes:

        The goal is to keep operational risk at appropriate levels relative to the characteristics of our businesses, the markets in which we operate our capital and liquidity, and the competitive, economic and regulatory environment. Notwithstanding these controls, Citigroup incurs operational losses.

Framework

        To monitor, mitigate and control operational risk, Citigroup maintains a system of comprehensive policies and has established a consistent, value-added framework for assessing and communicating operational risk and the overall effectiveness of the internal control environment across Citigroup. An Operational Risk Council has been established to provide oversight for operational risk across Citigroup. The Council's membership includes senior members of the Chief Risk Officer's organization covering multiple dimensions of risk management with representatives of the Business and Regional Chief Risk Officers' organizations and the Business Management Group. The Council's focus is on further advancing operational risk management at Citigroup with focus on proactive identification and mitigation of operational risk and related incidents. The Council works with the business segments and the control functions to help ensure a transparent, consistent and comprehensive framework for managing operational risk globally.

        Each major business segment must implement an operational risk process consistent with the requirements of this framework. The process for operational risk management includes the following steps:

        The operational risk standards facilitate the effective communication and mitigation of operational risk both within and across businesses. As new products and business activities are developed, processes are designed, modified or sourced through alternative means and operational risks are considered. Information about the businesses' operational risk, historical losses, and the control environment is reported by each major business segment and functional area, and summarized for senior management and the Citigroup Board of Directors.


Table of Contents

Measurement and Basel II

        To support advanced capital modeling and management, the businesses are required to capture relevant operational risk capital information. An enhanced version of the risk capital model for operational risk has been developed and implemented across the major business segments as a step toward readiness for Basel II capital calculations. The risk capital calculation is designed to qualify as an "Advanced Measurement Approach" under Basel II. It uses a combination of internal and external loss data to support statistical modeling of capital requirement estimates, which are then adjusted to reflect qualitative data regarding the operational risk and control environment.

Information Security and Continuity of Business

        Information security and the protection of confidential and sensitive customer data are a priority of Citigroup. The Company has implemented an Information Security Program that complies with the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and other regulatory guidance. The Information Security Program is reviewed and enhanced periodically to address emerging threats to customers' information.

        The Corporate Office of Business Continuity, with the support of senior management, continues to coordinate global preparedness and mitigate business continuity risks by reviewing and testing recovery procedures.


Table of Contents


COUNTRY AND CROSS-BORDER RISK

        The table below shows all countries where total Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) cross-border outstandings exceed 0.75% of total Citigroup assets:

June 30, 2009 December 31, 2008 
Cross-Border Claims on Third Parties 
In billions of U.S. dollars Banks Public Private Total Trading
and
Short-
Term
Claims(1)
 Investments
in and
Funding of
Local
Franchises
 Total
Cross-
Border
Outstandings
 Commitments(2) Total
Cross-
Border
Outstandings
 Commitments(2) 

Germany

 $7.9 $4.0 $8.2 $20.1 $18.4 $13.4 $33.5 $52.1 $29.9 $48.6 

France

  9.9  5.1  10.0  25.0  21.1  0.2  25.2  73.3  21.4  66.4 

India

  1.1    7.6  8.7  5.7  14.5  23.2  1.5  28.0  1.6 

South Korea

  2.1  1.1  4.1  7.3  7.1  12.8  20.1  14.2  22.0  15.7 

Netherlands

  5.0  1.4  12.8  19.2  14.9    19.2  69.5  17.7  67.4 

United Kingdom

  7.6    10.2  17.8  15.1    17.8  132.1  26.3  128.3 

Canada

  1.5  0.6  3.7  5.8  4.2  9.5  15.3  32.4  16.1  36.1 

Cayman Islands

  0.1    14.7  14.8  13.2    14.8  6.9  22.1  8.2 

Australia

  1.4  0.3  1.5  3.2  2.3  9.3  12.5  23.6  12.5  24.8 

Italy

  0.9  6.9  2.4  10.2  7.8  1.9  12.1  21.1  14.7  20.2 
                      

 
 September 30, 2009 December 31, 2008 
In Billions of U.S. dollars 
 Cross-Border Claims on Third Parties 
 
 Banks Public Private Total Trading
and
Short-Term
Claims
 Investments
in and
Funding of
Local
Franchises
 Total
Cross-Border
Outstandings
 Commitments Total
Cross-Border
Outstandings
 Commitments 

Germany

 $9.0 $4.9 $7.2 $21.1 $19.4 $6.3 $27.4 $56.6 $29.9 $48.6 

France

  10.1  5.9  8.9  24.9  21.0  0.1  25.0  75.2  21.4  66.4 

India

  0.9  0.2  6.9  8.0  5.0  15.0  23.0  1.6  28.0  1.6 

Netherlands

  6.3  3.3  10.5  20.1  16.2    20.1  73.8  17.7  67.4 

South Korea

  2.0  0.9  5.1  8.0  7.8  11.2  19.2  14.1  22.0  15.7 

United Kingdom

  6.3  0.2  9.5  16.0  13.4    16.0  135.5  26.3  128.3 

Italy

  0.8  8.7  3.0  12.5  10.1  3.1  15.6  21.7  14.7  20.2 

Cayman Islands

  0.2    14.2  14.4  13.3    14.4  6.8  22.1  8.2 

Canada

  1.3  0.5  3.5  5.3  3.6  8.0  13.3  7.4  16.1  36.1 
                      

(1)
Included in total cross-border claims on third parties.

(2)
Commitments (not included in total cross-border outstandings) include legally binding cross-border letters of credit and other commitments and contingencies as defined by the FFIEC. Effective March 31, 2006, the FFIEC revised the definition of commitments to include commitments to local residents to be funded with local currency local liabilities.

Table of Contents


INTEREST REVENUE/EXPENSE AND YIELDS

Average Rates- Rates—Interest Revenue, Interest Expense, and Net Interest Margin

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

In millions of dollars 2nd Qtr.
2009
 1st Qtr.
2009(1)
 2nd Qtr.
2008(1)
 Change
2Q09 vs. 2Q08
 

Interest Revenue(2)

 $19,671 $20,583 $27,337  (28)%

Interest Expense(3)

  6,842  7,657  13,351  (49)
          

Net Interest Revenue(2)(3)

 $12,829 $12,926 $13,986  (8)%
          

Interest Revenue—Average Rate

  4.97% 5.31% 6.21% (124) bps

Interest Expense—Average Rate

  1.94% 2.16% 3.29% (135) bps

Net Interest Margin (NIM)

  3.24% 3.33% 3.17% 7 bps 
          

Interest Rate Benchmarks:

             

Federal Funds Rate—End of Period

  0.00-0.25% 0.00-0.25% 2.00% (175+) bps
          

2 Year U.S. Treasury Note—Average Rate

  1.02% 0.90% 2.42% (140)bps

10 Year U.S. Treasury Note—Average Rate

  3.32% 2.74% 3.88% (56) bps
          
 

10 Year vs. 2 Year Spread

  230 bps  184 bps  146 bps    
          

In millions of dollars 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009(1)
 3rd Qtr.
2008(1)
 Change
3Q09 vs. 3Q08
 

Interest Revenue(2)

 $18,678 $19,671 $26,130  (29)%

Interest Expense(3)

  6,680  6,842  12,726  (48)
          

Net Interest Revenue(2)(3)

 $11,998 $12,829 $13,404  (10)%
          

Interest Revenue—Average Rate

 ��4.59% 4.97% 6.14% (155) bps

Interest Expense—Average Rate

  1.83% 1.93% 3.23% (140) bps

Net Interest Margin (NIM)

  2.95% 3.24% 3.15% (20) bps
          

Interest Rate Benchmarks:

             

Federal Funds Rate—End of Period

  0.00-0.25% 0.00-0.25% 2.00% (175+) bps
          

2 Year U.S. Treasury Note—Average Rate

  1.03% 1.02% 2.36% (133) bps

10 Year U.S. Treasury Note—Average Rate

  3.52% 3.32% 3.86% (34) bps
          
 

10 Year vs. 2 Year Spread

  249 bps  230 bps  150 bps    
          

(1)
Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation and to exclude discontinued operations.

(2)
Excludes taxable equivalent adjustment (based on the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $387 million, $82 million, $97and $51 million and $65 million for the third quarter of 2009, the second quarter of 2009, the first quarter of 2009, and the secondthird quarter of 2008, respectively.

(3)
Excludes expenses associated with hybrid financial instruments and beneficial interest in consolidated VIEs. These obligations are classified asLong-term debt and are accounted for at fair value with changes recorded inPrincipal transactions.

        A significant portion of the Company's business activities are based upon gathering deposits and borrowing money and then lending or investing those funds, including market-making activities in tradable securities. Net interest margin (NIM) is calculated by dividing annualized gross interest revenue less gross interest expense by average interest earning assets.

        During the secondthird quarter of 2009, the yields across both the interest earning assets as well as the interest earning liabilities dropped significantly from the same period in 2008. The lower cost of funds compared to prior yearasset yields more than offset the lower asset yields,cost of funds, resulting is slightly higher NIM.in lower NIM compared to the prior-year period.

        Net interest margin decreased by 29 basis points compared to the firstsecond quarter of 2009, driven mainly by lower yieldstwo principal items. First, the Company experienced a higher cost of borrowings due to debt issuances outside of the government programs (e.g., non-TLGP debt) as well the increased interest paid on the consumeradditional trust preferred securities outstanding as a result of the completion of the exchange offers. Second, Citi's business spread compression, generally of two types—narrowing of yields in Citi's asset businesses, due to the continued de-risking of loan portfolio both domesticallyportfolios and expansion of loss mitigation efforts, and the natural compression of spreads in the Company's deposit businesses as well as internationally. The second quartera result of 2009 NIM also includes the one-time FDIC special assessment of $333 million, which negatively impacted NIM by 8bps. This charge was included incontinued low interest expense on deposits.rate environment.


Table of Contents


AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES—ASSETS(1)(2)(3)(4)

 
 Average Volume Interest Revenue % Average Rate 
In millions of dollars 2nd Qtr.
2009
 1st Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2008
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 1st Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2008
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 1st Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2008
 
Assets                            
Deposits with banks(5) $168,631 $169,142 $62,582 $377 $436 $761  0.90% 1.05% 4.89%
                    
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell(6)                            
In U.S. offices $131,522 $128,004 $182,672 $515 $550 $1,326  1.57% 1.74% 2.92%
In offices outside the U.S.(5)  61,382  52,431  55,762  279  335  1,044  1.82  2.59  7.53 
                    
Total $192,904 $180,435 $238,434 $794 $885 $2,370  1.65% 1.99% 4.00%
                    
Trading account assets(7)(8)                            
In U.S. offices $134,334 $147,516 $241,068 $1,785 $1,984 $3,249  5.33% 5.45% 5.42%
In offices outside the U.S.(5)  120,468  108,451  160,687  1,136  967  1,385  3.78  3.62  3.47 
                    
Total $254,802 $255,967 $401,755 $2,921 $2,951 $4,634  4.60% 4.68% 4.64%
                    
Investments(1)                            
In U.S. offices                            
 Taxable $123,181 $121,901 $110,977 $1,674 $1,480 $1,105  5.45% 4.92% 4.00%
 Exempt from U.S. income tax  16,293  14,574  13,089  247  118  138  6.08  3.28  4.24 
In offices outside the U.S.(5)  118,891  106,950  97,456  1,514  1,578  1,305  5.11  5.98  5.39 
                    
Total $258,365 $243,425 $221,522 $3,435 $3,176 $2,548  5.33% 5.29% 4.63%
                    
Loans (net of unearned income)(9)                            
Consumer loans                            
In U.S. offices $306,273 $322,986 $346,975 $5,410 $6,051 $6,976  7.09% 7.60% 8.09%
In offices outside the U.S.(5)  153,352  149,341  182,294  3,236  3,512  4,782  8.46  9.54  10.55 
                    
Total consumer loans $459,625 $472,327 $529,269 $8,646 $9,563 $11,758  7.55% 8.21% 8.94%
                    
Corporate loans                            
In U.S. offices $79,074 $80,482 $75,372 $844 $780 $757  4.28% 3.93% 4.04%
In offices outside the U.S.(5)  117,242  118,906  149,960  2,439  2,512  3,426  8.34  8.57  9.19 
                    
Total corporate loans $196,316 $199,388 $225,332 $3,283 $3,292 $4,183  6.71% 6.70% 7.47%
                    
Total loans $655,941 $671,715 $754,601 $11,929 $12,855 $15,941  7.29% 7.76% 8.50%
                       
Other interest-earning Assets $57,416 $51,631 $92,988 $215 $280 $1,083  1.50% 2.20% 4.68%
                          
Total interest-earning Assets $1,588,059 $1,572,315 $1,771,882 $19,671 $20,583 $27,337  4.97% 5.31% 6.21%
                    
Non-interest-earning assets(7)  262,840  315,573  367,459                   
                          
Total Assets from discontinued operations $19,048 $20,083 $56,520                   
                          
Total assets $1,869,947 $1,907,971 $2,195,861                   
                          

 
 Average Volume Interest Revenue % Average Rate 
In millions of dollars 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 3rd Qtr.
2008
 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 3rd Qtr.
2008
 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 3rd Qtr.
2008
 

Assets

                            

Deposits with banks(5)

 $190,269 $168,631 $65,667 $313 $377 $792  0.65% 0.90% 4.80%
                    

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell(6)

                            

In U.S. offices

 $140,756 $131,522 $157,355 $476 $515 $1,272  1.34% 1.57% 3.22%

In offices outside the U.S.(5)

  70,790  61,382  73,631  252  279  943  1.41  1.82  5.10 
                    

Total

 $211,546 $192,904 $230,986 $728 $794 $2,215  1.37% 1.65% 3.81%
                    

Trading account assets(7)(8)

                            

In U.S. offices

 $138,781 $134,334 $210,248 $1,668 $1,785 $2,740  4.77% 5.33% 5.18%

In offices outside the U.S.(5)

  129,135  120,468  150,985  986  1,136  1,397  3.03  3.78  3.68 
                    

Total

 $267,916 $254,802 $361,233 $2,654 $2,921 $4,137  3.93% 4.60% 4.56%
                    

Investments(1)

                            

In U.S. offices

                            
 

Taxable

 $122,608 $123,181 $118,950 $1,568 $1,674 $1,185  5.07% 5.45% 3.96%
 

Exempt from U.S. income tax

  18,666  16,293  13,057  226  247  136  4.80  6.08  4.14 

In offices outside the U.S.(5)

  121,950  118,891  92,241  1,489  1,514  1,276  4.84  5.11  5.50 
                    

Total

 $263,224 $258,365 $224,248 $3,283 $3,435 $2,597  4.95% 5.33% 4.61%
                    

Loans (net of unearned income)(9)

                            

Consumer loans

                            

In U.S. offices

 $299,069 $306,273 $329,520 $5,346 $5,410 $6,755  7.09% 7.09% 8.16%

In offices outside the U.S.(5)

  151,124  153,352  179,660  3,339  3,236  4,709  8.77  8.46  10.43 
                    

Total consumer loans

 $450,193 $459,625 $509,180 $8,685 $8,646 $11,464  7.65% 7.55% 8.96%
                    

Corporate loans

                            

In U.S. offices

 $71,401 $79,074 $73,976 $593 $844 $778  3.30% 4.28% 4.18%

In offices outside the U.S.(5)

  117,087  117,242  135,766  2,323  2,439  3,286  7.87  8.34  9.63 
                    

Total corporate loans

 $188,488 $196,316 $209,742 $2,916 $3,283 $4,064  6.14% 6.71% 7.71%
                    

Total loans

 $638,681 $655,941 $718,922 $11,601 $11,929 $15,528  7.21% 7.29% 8.59%
                    

Other interest-earning Assets

 $43,869 $57,416 $91,182 $99 $215 $861  0.90% 1.50% 3.76%
                    

Total interest-earning Assets

 $1,615,505 $1,588,059 $1,692,238 $18,678 $19,671 $26,130  4.59% 4.97% 6.14%
                       

Non-interest-earning assets(7)

  253,316  262,840  357,433                   
                    

Total Assets from discontinued operations

 $21,418 $19,048 $45,337                   
                          

Total assets

 $1,890,239 $1,869,947 $2,095,008                   
                    

(1)
Interest revenue excludes the taxable equivalent adjustments (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $387 million, $82 million, $97and $51 million and $65 million for the third quarter of 2009, the second quarter of 2009, the first quarter of 2009, and the secondthird quarter of 2008, respectively.

(2)
Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities associated with the respective asset and liability categories.

(3)
Monthly or quarterly averages have been used by certain subsidiaries where daily averages are unavailable.

(4)
Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

(5)
Average rates reflect prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary correction in certain countries.

(6)
Average volumes of securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell are reported net pursuant to FIN 41 (ASC 210-20-45) andnet. However, Interest revenue excludes the impact of FIN 41(ASC 210-20-45).is reflected gross.

(7)
The fair value carrying amounts of derivative and foreign exchange contracts are reported in non-interest-earning assets and other non-interest-bearing liabilities.

(8)
Interest expense onTrading account liabilities of the ICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported inTrading account assets andTrading account liabilities, respectively.

(9)
Includes cash-basis loans.

Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.


Table of Contents


AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES—LIABILITIES AND EQUITY,
AND NET INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)(4)

 
 Average Volume Interest Expense % Average Rate 
In millions of dollars 2nd Qtr.
2009
 1st Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2008
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 1st Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2008
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 1st Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2008
 
Liabilities                            
Deposits                            
In U. S. offices                            
 Savings deposits(5) $167,713 $164,977 $163,923 $999 $633 $683  2.39% 1.56% 1.68%
 Other time deposits  57,869  61,283  57,911  278  416  614  1.93  2.75  4.26 
In offices outside the U.S.(6)  428,188  408,840  488,304  1,563  1,799  3,785  1.46  1.78  3.12 
                    
Total $653,770 $635,100 $710,138 $2,840 $2,848 $5,082  1.74% 1.82% 2.88%
                    
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase(7)                            
In U.S. offices $133,948 $152,256 $195,879 $288 $316 $1,299  0.86% 0.84% 2.67%
In offices outside the U.S.(6)  74,346  68,184  84,448  643  788  1,648  3.47  4.69  7.85 
                    
Total $208,294 $220,440 $280,327 $931 $1,104 $2,947  1.79% 2.03% 4.23%
                    
Trading account liabilities(8)(9)                            
In U.S. offices $19,592 $20,712 $29,764 $50 $93 $413  1.02% 1.82% 5.58%
In offices outside the U.S.(6)  36,652  31,101  45,054  19  15  37  0.21  0.20  0.33 
                    
Total $56,244 $51,813 $74,818 $69 $108 $450  0.49% 0.85% 2.42%
                    
Short-term borrowings                            
In U.S. offices $136,200 $148,673 $152,356 $209 $367 $814  0.62% 1.00% 2.15%
In offices outside the U.S.(6)  35,299  35,214  59,531  106  96  147  1.20  1.11  0.99 
                    
Total $171,499 $183,887 $211,887 $315 $463 $961  0.74% 1.02% 1.82%
                    
Long-term debt(10)                            
In U.S. offices $296,324 $309,670 $315,686 $2,427 $2,820 $3,454  3.29% 3.69% 4.40%
In offices outside the U.S.(6)  29,318  34,058  37,585  260  314  457  3.56  3.74  4.89 
                    
Total $325,642 $343,728 $353,271 $2,687 $3,134 $3,911  3.31% 3.70% 4.45%
                    
Total interest-bearing liabilities $1,415,449 $1,434,968 $1,630,441 $6,842 $7,657 $13,351  1.94% 2.16% 3.29%
                       
Demand deposits in U.S. offices  25,039  15,383  13,402                   
Other non-interest-bearing liabilities(8)  267,055  300,614  378,465                   
Total liabilities from discontinued operations  12,122  11,698  32,229                   
                          
Total liabilities $1,719,665 $1,762,663 $2,054,537                   
                          
Citigroup equity(11) $148,448 $143,297 $135,010                   
                          
Noncontrolling Interest  1,834  2,011  6,314                   
                          
Total Equity $150,282 $145,308 $141,324                   
                          
Total Liabilities and Equity $1,869,947 $1,907,971 $2,195,861                   
                    
Net interest revenue as a percentage of average interest-earning assets(12)                            
In U.S. offices $944,819 $970,429 $1,036,000 $6,452 $6,643  6,631  2.74% 2.78% 2.57%
In offices outside the U.S.(6)  643,240  601,886  735,882  6,377  6,283  7,355  3.98  4.23  4.02 
                    
Total $1,588,059 $1,572,315 $1,771,882 $12,829 $12,926 $13,986  3.24% 3.33% 3.17%
                    

 
 Average Volume Interest Expense % Average Rate 
In millions of dollars 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 3rd Qtr.
2008
 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 3rd Qtr.
2008
 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 3rd Qtr.
2008
 

Liabilities

                            

Deposits

                            

In U.S. offices

                            
 

Savings deposits(5)

 $173,999 $173,168 $161,437 $613 $999 $611  1.40% 2.31% 1.51%
 

Other time deposits

  62,256  57,869  54,928  224  278  554  1.43  1.93  4.01 

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

  459,142  428,188  464,429  1,461  1,563  3,750  1.26  1.46  3.21 
                    

Total

 $695,397 $659,225 $680,794 $2,298 $2,840 $4,915  1.31% 1.73% 2.87%
                    

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase(7)

                            

In U.S. offices

 $131,641 $133,948 $160,202 $248 $288 $1,185  0.75% 0.86% 2.94%

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

  72,302  74,346  99,047  524  643  1,536  2.88  3.47  6.17 
                    

Total

 $203,943 $208,294 $259,249 $772 $931 $2,721  1.50% 1.79% 4.18%
                    

Trading account liabilities(8)(9)

                            

In U.S. offices

 $21,204 $19,592 $30,251 $28 $50 $251  0.52% 1.02% 3.30%

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

  39,431  36,652  41,816  15  19  34  0.15  0.21  0.32 
                    

Total

 $60,635 $56,244 $72,067 $43 $69 $285  0.28% 0.49% 1.57%
                    

Short-term borrowings

                            

In U.S. offices

 $108,474 $136,200 $149,398 $259 $209 $729  0.95% 0.62% 1.94%

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

  30,985  35,299  45,497  91  106  195  1.17  1.20  1.71 
                    

Total

 $139,459 $171,499 $194,895 $350 $315 $924  1.00% 0.74% 1.89%
                    

Long-term debt(10)

                            

In U.S. offices

 $318,610 $296,324 $323,788 $2,952 $2,427 $3,460  3.68% 3.29% 4.25%

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

  27,447  29,318  36,375  265  260  421  3.83  3.56  4.60 
                    

Total

 $346,057 $325,642 $360,163 $3,217 $2,687 $3,881  3.69% 3.31% 4.29%
                    

Total interest-bearing liabilities

 $1,445,491 $1,420,904 $1,567,168 $6,680 $6,842 $12,726  1.83% 1.93% 3.23%
                       

Demand deposits in U.S. offices

  34,592  19,584  7,326                   

Other non-interest-bearing liabilities(8)

  250,768  267,055  351,379                   

Total liabilities from discontinued operations

  14,189  12,122  30,467                   
                          

Total liabilities

 $1,745,040 $1,719,665 $1,956,340                   
                          

Citigroup equity(11)

 $143,547 $148,448 $131,771                   
                          

Noncontrolling Interest

  1,652  1,834  6,897                   
                          

Total Equity

 $145,199 $150,282 $138,668                   
                          

Total Liabilities and Equity

 $1,890,239 $1,869,947 $2,095,008                   
                    

Net interest revenue as a percentage of average interest-earning assets(12)

                            

In U.S. offices

 $947,414 $944,819 $976,773 $5,694 $6,452  6,424  2.38% 2.74% 2.62%

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

  668,091  643,240  715,465  6,304  6,377  6,980  3.74  3.98  3.88 
                    

Total

 $1,615,505 $1,588,059 $1,692,238 $11,998 $12,829 $13,404  2.95% 3.24% 3.15%
                    

(1)
Interest revenue excludes the taxable equivalent adjustments (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $387 million, $82 million, $97and $51 million and $65 million for the third quarter of 2009, the second quarter of 2009, the first quarter of 2009, and the secondthird quarter of 2008, respectively.

(2)
Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities associated with the respective asset and liability categories.

(3)
Monthly or quarterly averages have been used by certain subsidiaries where daily averages are unavailable.

(4)
Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

(5)
Savings deposits consist of Insured Money Market Rate accounts, NOW accounts, and other savings deposits. The second quarter of 2009 interest expense includes the one-time FDIC special assessment of $333 million.

(6)
Average rates reflect prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.

(7)
Average volumes of securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase are reported net pursuant to FIN 41(ASC 210-20-45) andnet. However, Interest expense excludes the impact of FIN 41(ASC 210-20-45).revenue is reflected gross.

(8)
The fair value carrying amounts of derivative and foreign exchange contracts are reported in non-interest-earning assets and other non-interest-bearing liabilities.

(9)
Interest expense onTrading account liabilities of the ICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported inTrading account assets andTrading account liabilities, respectively.

(10)
Excludes hybrid financial instruments and beneficial interests in consolidated VIEs that are classified as long-term debt as these obligations are accounted for at fair value with changes recorded in Principal Transactions. In addition, the majority of the funding provided by Corporate Treasury to CitiCapital operations is excluded from this line.

(11)
Includes stockholders' equity from discontinued operations.

(12)
Includes allocations for capital and funding costs based on the location of the asset.

Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.


Table of Contents

AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES—ASSETS(1)(2)(3)(4)

 
 Average Volume Interest Revenue % Average Rate 
In millions of dollars Six Months
2009
 Six Months
2008
 Six Months
2009
 Six Months
2008
 Six Months
2009
 Six Months
2008
 
Assets                   
Deposits with banks(5) $168,887 $61,952 $813 $1,537  0.97% 4.99%
              
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell(6)                   
In U.S. offices $129,763 $180,046 $1,065 $3,072  1.66% 3.43%
In offices outside the U.S.(5)  56,907  78,460  614  2,464  2.18  6.32 
              
Total $186,670 $258,506 $1,679 $5,536  1.81% 4.31%
              
Trading account assets(7)(8)                   
In U.S. offices $140,925 $247,612 $3,769 $6,883  5.39% 5.59%
In offices outside the U.S.(5)  114,460  166,454  2,103  2,542  3.71  3.07 
              
Total $255,385 $414,066 $5,872 $9,425  4.64% 4.58%
              
Investments(1)                   
In U.S. offices                   
 Taxable $122,541 $107,726 $3,154 $2,284  5.19% 4.26%
 Exempt from U.S. income tax  15,434  13,060  365  297  4.77  4.57 
In offices outside the U.S.(5)  112,921  98,609  3,092  2,654  5.52  5.41 
              
Total $250,896 $219,395 $6,611 $5,235  5.31% 4.80%
              
Loans (net of unearned income)(9)                   
Consumer loans                   
In U.S. offices $314,630 $349,900 $11,461 $14,158  7.35% 8.14%
In offices outside the U.S.(5)  151,347  180,186  6,748  9,420  8.99  10.51 
              
Total consumer loans $465,977 $530,086 $18,209 $23,578  7.88% 8.94%
              
Corporate loans                   
In U.S. offices $79,778 $75,778 $1,624 $1,751  4.11% 4.65%
In offices outside the U.S.(5)  118,074  153,034  4,951  7,026  8.46  9.23 
              
Total corporate loans $197,852 $228,812 $6,575 $8,777  6.70% 7.71%
              
Total loans $663,829 $758,898 $24,784 $32,355  7.53% 8.57%
              
Other interest-earning assets $54,524 $105,473 $495 $2,410  1.83% 4.59%
              
Total interest-earning assets $1,580,191 $1,818,290 $40,254 $56,498  5.14% 6.25%
                
Non-interest-earning assets(7)  289,207  384,383             
Total assets from discontinued operations  19,566  57,945             
                  
Total assets $1,888,964 $2,260,618             
                  

 
 Average Volume Interest Revenue % Average Rate 
In millions of dollars Nine Months
2009
 Nine Months
2008
 Nine Months
2009
 Nine Months
2008
 Nine Months
2009
 Nine Months
2008
 

Assets

                   

Deposits with banks(5)

 $176,014 $63,190 $1,126 $2,329  0.86% 4.92%

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell(6)

                   

In U.S. offices

 $133,427 $172,482 $1,541 $4,344  1.54% 3.36%

In offices outside the U.S.(5)

  61,534  76,851  866  3,407  1.88  5.92 
              

Total

 $194,961 $249,333 $2,407 $7,751  1.65% 4.15%
              

Trading account assets(7)(8)

                   

In U.S. offices

 $140,210 $235,157 $5,437 $9,623  5.18% 5.47%

In offices outside the U.S.(5)

  119,351  161,297  3,089  3,939  3.46  3.26 
              

Total

 $259,561 $396,454 $8,526 $13,562  4.39% 4.57%
              

Investments(1)

                   

In U.S. offices

                   
 

Taxable

 $122,563 $111,467 $4,722 $3,469  5.15% 4.16%
 

Exempt from U.S. income tax

  16,511  13,059  591  433  4.79  4.43 

In offices outside the U.S.(5)

  115,930  96,486  4,581  3,930  5.28  5.44 
              

Total

 $255,004 $221,012 $9,894 $7,832  5.19% 4.73%
              

Loans (net of unearned income)(9)

                   

Consumer loans

                   

In U.S. offices

 $309,443 $343,107 $16,807 $20,913  7.26% 8.14%

In offices outside the U.S.(5)

  151,272  180,010  10,087  14,129  8.92  10.48 
              

Total consumer loans

 $460,715 $523,117 $26,894 $35,042  7.80% 8.95%
              

Corporate loans

                   

In U.S. offices

 $76,986 $75,177 $2,217 $2,529  3.85% 4.49%

In offices outside the U.S.(5)

  117,745  147,278  7,274  10,312  8.26  9.35 
              

Total corporate loans

 $194,731 $222,455 $9,491 $12,841  6.52% 7.71%
              

Total loans

 $655,446 $745,572 $36,385 $47,883  7.42% 8.58%
              

Other interest-earning assets

 $50,972 $100,709 $594 $3,271  1.56% 4.34%
              

Total interest-earning assets

 $1,591,958 $1,776,270 $58,932 $82,628  4.95% 6.21%
                

Non-interest-earning assets(7)

  277,243  375,399             

Total assets from discontinued operations

  20,183  53,742             
                  

Total assets

 $1,889,384 $2,205,411             
                  

(1)
Interest revenue excludes the taxable equivalent adjustments (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $179$566 million and $113$164 million for the first sixnine months of 2009 and 2008, respectively.

(2)
Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities associated with the respective asset and liability categories.

(3)
Monthly or quarterly averages have been used by certain subsidiaries where daily averages are unavailable.

(4)
Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

(5)
Average rates reflect prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary correction in certain countries.

(6)
Average volumes of securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell are reported net pursuant to FIN 41(ASC 210-20-45) and interestnet. However, Interest revenue excludes the impact of FIN 41(ASC 210-20-45).is reflected gross.

(7)
The fair value carrying amounts of derivative and foreign exchange contracts are reported in non-interest-earning assets and other non-interest bearing liabilities.

(8)
Interest expense onTrading account liabilitiesof theICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported inTrading account assetsandTrading account liabilities, respectively.

(9)
Includes cash-basis loans.

Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.


Table of Contents

AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES—LIABILITIES AND EQUITY,
AND NET INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)(4)

 
 Average Volume Interest Expense % Average Rate 
In millions of dollars Six Months
2009
 Six Months
2008
 Six Months
2009
 Six Months
2008
 Six Months
2009
 Six Months
2008
 
Liabilities                   
Deposits                   
In U. S. offices                   
 Savings deposits(5) $166,345 $164,434 $1,632 $1,723  1.98% 2.11%
 Other time deposits  59,576  61,352  694  1,391  2.35  4.56 
In offices outside the U.S.(6)  418,514  497,266  3,362  8,162  1.62  3.30 
              
Total $644,435 $723,052 $5,688 $11,276  1.78% 3.14%
              
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase(7)                   
In U.S. offices $143,102 $202,879 $604 $3,334  0.85% 3.30%
In offices outside the U.S.(6)  71,265  101,132  1,431  3,504  4.05  6.97 
              
Total $214,367 $304,011 $2,035 $6,838  1.91% 4.52%
              
Trading account liabilities(8)(9)                   
In U.S. offices $20,152 $33,739 $143 $683  1.43% 4.07%
In offices outside the U.S.(6)  33,877  48,673  34  96  0.20  0.40 
              
Total $54,029 $82,412 $177 $779  0.66% 1.90%
              
Short-term borrowings                   
In U.S. offices $142,437 $159,988 $576 $1,966  0.82% 2.47%
In offices outside the U.S.(6)  35,257  58,909  202  343  1.16  1.17 
              
Total $177,694 $218,897 $778 $2,309  0.88% 2.12%
              
Long-term debt(10)                   
In U.S. offices $302,997 $307,517 $5,247 $7,285  3.49% 4.76%
In offices outside the U.S.(6)  31,688  38,641  574  937  3.65  4.88 
              
Total $334,685 $346,158 $5,821 $8,222  3.51% 4.78%
              
Total interest-bearing liabilities $1,425,210 $1,674,530 $14,499 $29,424  2.05% 3.53%
                
Demand deposits in U.S. offices  20,214  13,180             
Other non-interest bearing liabilities(8)  283,835  405,821             
Total liabilities from discontinued operations  11,910  31,285             
                  
Total liabilities $1,741,169 $2,124,816             
                  
Total Citigroup equity(11) $145,873 $130,983             
Noncontrolling interest  1,922  4,819             
                  
Total Equity $147,795 $135,802             
                  
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $1,888,964 $2,260,618             
              
Net interest revenue as a percentage of average interest-earning assets(12)                   
In U.S. offices $957,624 $1,050,297 $13,095 $12,763  2.76% 2.44%
In offices outside the U.S.(6)  622,567  767,993  12,660  14,311  4.10  3.75 
              
Total $1,580,191 $1,818,290 $25,755 $27,074  3.29% 2.99%
              

 
 Average Volume Interest Expense % Average Rate 
In millions of dollars Nine Months
2009
 Nine Months
2008
 Nine Months
2009
 Nine Months
2008
 Nine Months
2009
 Nine Months
2008
 

Liabilities

                   

Deposits

                   

In U.S. offices

                   
 

Savings deposits(5)

 $170,715 $166,799 $2,245 $2,334  1.76% 1.87%
 

Other time deposits

  60,469  59,210  918  1,946  2.03  4.39 

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

  432,057  486,320  4,823  11,912  1.49  3.27 
              

Total

 $663,241 $712,329 $7,986 $16,191  1.61% 3.04%
              

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase(7)

                   

In U.S. offices

 $139,282 $188,653 $852 $4,519  0.82% 3.20%

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

  71,611  100,437  1,955  5,040  3.65  6.70 
              

Total

 $210,893 $289,090 $2,807 $9,559  1.78% 4.42%
              

Trading account liabilities(8)(9)

                   

In U.S. offices

 $20,503 $32,576 $171 $934  1.12% 3.83%

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

  35,728  46,387  49  130  0.18  0.37 
              

Total

 $56,231 $78,963 $220 $1,064  0.52% 1.80%
              

Short-term borrowings

                   

In U.S. offices

 $131,116 $156,458 $835 $2,695  0.85% 2.30%

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

  33,833  54,438  293  538  1.16  1.32 
              

Total

 $164,949 $210,896 $1,128 $3,233  0.91% 2.05%
              

Long-term debt(10)

                   

In U.S. offices

 $308,201 $312,940 $8,199 $10,745  3.56% 4.59%

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

  30,274  37,885  839  1,358  3.71  4.79 
              

Total

 $338,475 $350,825 $9,038 $12,103  3.57% 4.61%
              

Total interest-bearing liabilities

 $1,433,789 $1,642,103 $21,179 $42,150  1.97% 3.43%
                

Demand deposits in U.S. offices

  23,186  7,865             

Other non-interest bearing liabilities(8)

  272,809  387,673             

Total liabilities from discontinued operations

  12,670  31,013             
                  

Total liabilities

 $1,742,454 $2,068,654             
                  

Total Citigroup equity(11)

 $145,097 $131,245             

Noncontrolling interest

  1,833  5,512             
                  

Total Equity

 $146,930 $136,757             
                  

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

 $1,889,384 $2,205,411             
              

Net interest revenue as a percentage of average interest-earning assets(12)

                   

In U.S. offices

 $954,220 $1,025,789 $18,789 $19,187  2.63% 2.50%

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

  637,738  750,481  18,964  21,291  3.98  3.79 
              

Total

 $1,591,958 $1,776,270 $37,753 $40,478  3.17% 3.04%
              

(1)
Interest revenue excludes the taxable equivalent adjustments (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $179$566 million and $133$164 million for the first sixnine months of 2009 and 2008, respectively.

(2)
Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities associated with the respective asset and liability categories.

(3)
Monthly or quarterly averages have been used by certain subsidiaries where daily averages are unavailable.

(4)
Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

(5)
Savings deposits consist of Insured Money Market Rate accounts, NOW accounts, and other savings deposits. The second quarter of 2009 interest expense includes the one-time FDIC special assessment of $333 million.

(6)
Average rates reflect prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.

(7)
Average volumes of securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase are reported net pursuant to FIN 41(ASC 210-20-45) and interest expense excludes the impact of FIN 41(ASC 210-20-45).net. However, Interest revenue is reflected gross.

(8)
The fair value carrying amounts of derivative and foreign exchange contracts are reported in non-interest-earning assets and other non-interest bearing liabilities.

(9)
Interest expense onTrading account liabilitiesof the ICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported inTrading account assetsandTrading account liabilities, respectively.

(10)
Excludes hybrid financial instruments and beneficial interests in consolidated VIEs that are classified as long-term debt as these obligations are accounted for at fair value with changes recorded in Principal Transactions. In addition, the majority of the funding provided by Corporate Treasury to CitiCapital is excluded from this line.

(11)
Includes stockholders' equity from discontinued operations.

(12)
Includes allocations for capital and funding costs based on the location of the asset.

Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.


Table of Contents


ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)

 
 2nd Qtr. 2009 vs. 1st Qtr. 2009 2nd Qtr. 2009 vs. 2nd Qtr. 2008 
 
 Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in:
  
 Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in:
  
 
In millions of dollars Average
Volume
 Average Rate Net Change Average
Volume
 Average Rate Net Change 
Deposits with banks(4) $(1)$(58)$(59)$579 $(963)$(384)
              
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell                   
In U.S. offices $15 $(50)$(35)$(307)$(504)$(811)
In offices outside the U.S.(4)  51  (107) (56) 96  (861) (765)
              
Total $66 $(157)$(91)$(211)$(1,365)$(1,576)
              
Trading account assets(5)                   
In U.S. offices $(175)$(24)$(199)$(1,419)$(45)$(1,464)
In offices outside the U.S.(4)  111  58  169  (370) 121  (249)
              
Total $(64)$34 $(30)$(1,789)$76 $(1,713)
              
Investments(1)                   
In U.S. offices $36 $287 $323 $169 $509 $678 
In offices outside the U.S.(4)  165  (229) (64) 275  (66) 209 
              
Total $201 $58 $259 $444 $443 $887 
              
Loans—consumer                   
In U.S. offices $(305)$(336)$(641)$(769)$(797)$(1,566)
In offices outside the U.S.(4)  93  (369) (276) (693) (853) (1,546)
              
Total $(212)$(705)$(917)$(1,462)$(1,650)$(3,112)
              
Loans—corporate                   
In U.S. offices $(14)$78 $64 $38 $49 $87 
In offices outside the U.S.(4)  (35) (38) (73) (700) (287) (987)
              
Total $(49)$40 $(9)$(662)$(238)$(900)
              
Total loans $(261)$(665)$(926)$(2,124)$(1,888)$(4,012)
              
Other interest-earning assets $29 $(94)$(65)$(313)$(555)$(868)
              
Total interest revenue $(30)$(882)$(912)$(3,414)$(4,252)$(7,666)
              

 
 3rd Qtr. 2009 vs. 2nd Qtr. 2009 3rd Qtr. 2009 vs. 3rd Qtr. 2008 
 
 Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in:
  
 Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in:
  
 
In millions of dollars Average
Volume
 Average
Rate
 Net
Change
 Average
Volume
 Average
Rate
 Net
Change
 

Deposits with banks(4)

 $44 $(108)$(64)$611 $(1,090)$(479)
              

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

                   

In U.S. offices

 $34 $(73)$(39)$(122)$(674)$(796)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  39  (66) (27) (35) (656) (691)
              

Total

 $73 $(139)$(66)$(157)$(1,330)$(1,487)
              

Trading account assets(5)

                   

In U.S. offices

 $58 $(175)$(117)$(872)$(200)$(1,072)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  77  (227) (150) (186) (225) (411)
              

Total

 $135 $(402)$(267)$(1,058)$(425)$(1,483)
              

Investments(1)

                   

In U.S. offices

 $25 $(152)$(127)$98 $375 $473 

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  38  (63) (25) 376  (163) 213 
              

Total

 $63 $(215)$(152)$474 $212 $686 
              

Loans—consumer

                   

In U.S. offices

 $(128)$64 $(64)$(591)$(818)$(1,409)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  (48) 151  103  (689) (681) (1,370)
              

Total

 $(176)$215 $39 $(1,280)$(1,499)$(2,779)
              

Loans—corporate

                   

In U.S. offices

 $(76)$(175)$(251)$(26)$(159)$(185)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  (3) (113) (116) (417) (546) (963)
              

Total

 $(79)$(288)$(367)$(443)$(705)$(1,148)
              

Total loans

 $(255)$(73)$(328)$(1,723)$(2,204)$(3,927)
              

Other interest-earning assets

 $(43)$(73)$(116)$(309)$(453)$(762)
              

Total interest revenue

 $17 $(1,010)$(993)$(2,162)$(5,290)$(7,452)
              

(1)
The taxable equivalent adjustment is based on the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate of 35% and is excluded from this presentation.

(2)
Rate/volume variance is allocated based on the percentage relationship of changes in volume and changes in rate to the total net change.

(3)
Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

(4)
Changes in average rates reflect changes in prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.

(5)
Interest expense onTrading account liabilities of ICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported inTrading account assets andTrading account liabilities, respectively.

Table of Contents


ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN INTEREST EXPENSE AND NET INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)

 
 2nd Qtr. 2009 vs. 1st Qtr. 2009 2nd Qtr. 2009 vs. 2nd Qtr. 2008 
 
 Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in:
  
 Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in:
  
 
In millions of dollars Average
Volume
 Average Rate Net Change Average
Volume
 Average Rate Net Change 
Deposits                   
In U.S. offices $(3)$231 $228 $22 $(42)$(20)
In offices outside the U.S.(4)  82  (318) (236) (420) (1,802) (2,222)
              
Total $79 $(87)$(8)$(398)$(1,844)$(2,242)
              
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase                   
In U.S. offices $(39)$11 $(28)$(322)$(689)$(1,011)
In offices outside the U.S.(4)  66  (211) (145) (178) (827) (1,005)
              
Total $27 $(200)$(173)$(500)$(1,516)$(2,016)
              
Trading account liabilities(5)                   
In U.S. offices $(5)$(38)$(43)$(107)$(256)$(363)
In offices outside the U.S.(4)  3  1  4  (6) (12) (18)
              
Total $(2)$(37)$(39)$(113)$(268)$(381)
              
Short-term borrowings                   
In U.S. offices $(28)$(130)$(158)$(78)$(527)$(605)
In offices outside the U.S.(4)    10  10  (69) 28  (41)
              
Total $(28)$(120)$(148)$(147)$(499)$(646)
              
Long-term debt                   
In U.S. offices $(118)$(275)$(393)$(201)$(826)$(1,027)
In offices outside the U.S.(4)  (42) (12) (54) (89) (108) (197)
              
Total $(160)$(287)$(447)$(290)$(934)$(1,224)
              
Total interest expense $(84)$(731)$(815)$(1,448)$(5,061)$(6,509)
              
Net interest revenue $54 $(151)$(97)$(1,966)$809 $(1,157)
              

 
 3rd Qtr. 2009 vs. 2nd Qtr. 2009 3rd Qtr. 2009 vs. 3rd Qtr. 2008 
 
 Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in:
  
 Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in:
  
 
In millions of dollars Average
Volume
 Average
Rate
 Net
Change
 Average
Volume
 Average
Rate
 Net
Change
 

Deposits

                   

In U.S. offices

 $28 $(468)$(440)$99 $(427)$(328)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  108  (210) (102) (42) (2,247) (2,289)
              

Total

 $136 $(678)$(542)$57 $(2,674)$(2,617)
              

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

                   

In U.S. offices

 $(5)$(35)$(40)$(181)$(756)$(937)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  (17) (102) (119) (340) (672) (1,012)
              

Total

 $(22)$(137)$(159)$(521)$(1,428)$(1,949)
              

Trading account liabilities(5)

                   

In U.S. offices

 $4 $(26)$(22)$(59)$(164)$(223)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  1  (5) (4) (2) (17) (19)
              

Total

 $5 $(31)$(26)$(61)$(181)$(242)
              

Short-term borrowings

                   

In U.S. offices

 $(49)$99 $50 $(164)$(306)$(470)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  (13) (2) (15) (52) (52) (104)
              

Total

 $(62)$97 $35 $(216)$(358)$(574)
              

Long-term debt

                   

In U.S. offices

 $191 $334 $525 $(55)$(453)$(508)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  (17) 22  5  (93) (63) (156)
              

Total

 $174 $356 $530 $(148)$(516)$(664)
              

Total interest expense

 $231 $(393)$(162)$(889)$(5,157)$(6,046)
              

Net interest revenue

 $(214)$(617)$(831)$(1,273)$(133)$(1,406)
              

(1)
The taxable equivalent adjustment is based on the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate of 35% and is excluded from this presentation.

(2)
Rate/volume variance is allocated based on the percentage relationship of changes in volume and changes in rate to the total net change.

(3)
Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

(4)
Changes in average rates reflect changes in prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.

(5)
Interest expense onTrading account liabilities ofICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported inTrading account assets andTrading account liabilities, respectively.

Table of Contents

ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN INTEREST REVENUE, INTEREST EXPENSE, AND NET INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)

 
 Six Months 2009 vs. Six Months 2008 
 
 Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in:
  
 
In millions of dollars Average Volume Average Rate Net
Change(2)
 
Deposits at interest with banks(4) $1,195 $(1,919)$(724)
        
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell          
In U.S. offices $(702)$(1,305)$(2,007)
In offices outside the U.S.(4)  (546) (1,304) (1,850)
        
Total $(1,248)$(2,609)$(3,857)
        
Trading account assets(5)          
In U.S. offices $(2,862)$(252)$(3,114)
In offices outside the U.S.(4)  (892) 453  (439)
        
Total $(3,754)$201 $(3,553)
        
Investments(1)          
In U.S. offices $397 $541 $938 
In offices outside the U.S.(4)  392  46  438 
        
Total $789 $587 $1,376 
        
Loans—consumer          
In U.S. offices $(1,356)$(1,341)$(2,697)
In offices outside the U.S.(4)  (1,392) (1,280) (2,672)
        
Total $(2,748)$(2,621)$(5,369)
        
Loans—corporate          
In U.S. offices $89 $(216)$(127)
In offices outside the U.S.(4)  (1,504) (571) (2,075)
        
Total $(1,415)$(787)$(2,202)
        
Total loans $(4,163)$(3,408)$(7,571)
        
Other interest-earning assets $(852)$(1,063)$(1,915)
        
Total interest revenue $(8,033)$(8,211)$(16,244)
        
Deposits          
In U.S. offices $2 $(790)$(788)
In offices outside the U.S.(4)  (1,136) (3,664) (4,800)
        
Total $(1,134)$(4,454)$(5,588)
        
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase          
In U.S. offices $(775)$(1,955)$(2,730)
In offices outside the U.S.(4)  (855) (1,218) (2,073)
        
Total $(1,630)$(3,173)$(4,803)
        
Trading account liabilities(5)          
In U.S. offices $(207)$(333)$(540)
In offices outside the U.S.(4)  (24) (38) (62)
        
Total $(231)$(371)$(602)
        
Short-term borrowings          
In U.S. offices $(195)$(1,195)$(1,390)
In offices outside the U.S.(4)  (136) (5) (141)
        
Total $(331)$(1,200)$(1,531)
        
Long-term debt          
In U.S. offices $(106)$(1,932)$(2,038)
In offices outside the U.S.(4)  (151) (212) (363)
        
Total $(257)$(2,144)$(2,401)
        
Total interest expense $(3,583)$(11,342)$(14,925)
        
Net interest revenue $(4,450)$3,131 $(1,319)
        

 
 Nine Months 2009 vs. Nine Months 2008 
 
 Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in:
  
 
In millions of dollars Average
Volume
 Average
Rate
 Net
Change(2)
 

Deposits at interest with banks(4)

 $1,809 $(3,012)$(1,203)
        

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

          

In U.S. offices

 $(827)$(1,976)$(2,803)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  (574) (1,967) (2,541)
        

Total

 $(1,401)$(3,943)$(5,344)
        

Trading account assets(5)

          

In U.S. offices

 $(3,705)$(481)$(4,186)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  (1,074) 224  (850)
        

Total

 $(4,779)$(257)$(5,036)
        

Investments(1)

          

In U.S. offices

 $491 $920 $1,411 

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  771  (120) 651 
        

Total

 $1,262 $800 $2,062 
        

Loans—consumer

          

In U.S. offices

 $(1,946)$(2,160)$(4,106)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  (2,081) (1,961) (4,042)
        

Total

 $(4,027)$(4,121)$(8,148)
        

Loans—corporate

          

In U.S. offices

 $60 $(372)$(312)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  (1,914) (1,124) (3,038)
        

Total

 $(1,854)$(1,496)$(3,350)
        

Total loans

 $(5,881)$(5,617)$(11,498)
        

Other interest-earning assets

 $(1,165)$(1,512)$(2,677)
        

Total interest revenue

 $(10,155)$(13,541)$(23,696)
        

Deposits

          

In U.S. offices

 $96 $(1,212)$(1,116)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  (1,206) (5,883) (7,089)
        

Total

 $(1,110)$(7,095)$(8,205)
        

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

          

In U.S. offices

 $(954)$(2,713)$(3,667)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  (1,192) (1,893) (3,085)
        

Total

 $(2,146)$(4,606)$(6,752)
        

Trading account liabilities(5)

          

In U.S. offices

 $(262)$(501)$(763)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  (25) (56) (81)
        

Total

 $(287)$(557)$(844)
        

Short-term borrowings

          

In U.S. offices

 $(380)$(1,480)$(1,860)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  (185) (60) (245)
        

Total

 $(565)$(1,540)$(2,105)
        

Long-term debt

          

In U.S. offices

 $(160)$(2,386)$(2,546)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  (244) (275) (519)
        

Total

 $(404)$(2,661)$(3,065)
        

Total interest expense

 $(4,512)$(16,459)$(20,971)
        

Net interest revenue

 $(5,643)$2,918 $(2,725)
        

(1)
The taxable equivalent adjustment is based on the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate of 35% and is excluded from this presentation.

(2)
Rate/volume variance is allocated based on the percentage relationship of changes in volume and changes in rate to the total net change.

(3)
Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

(4)
Changes in average rates reflect changes in prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.

(5)
Interest expense onTrading account liabilities of the ICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported inTrading account assets andTrading account liabilities, respectively.

Table of Contents


CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY

CAPITAL RESOURCES

Overview

        CapitalGenerally, capital is generally generated by earnings from Citi's operating businesses. This is augmentedPrimarily as a result of the exchange offers, Citigroup increased its Tier 1 Common by $63 billion from the second quarter of 2009 to $90 billion. In addition, the Company's Tangible Common Equity (TCE) increased by $62 billion from the second quarter of 2009 to $102 billion at September 30, 2009. Tier 1 Common, TCE and related ratios are used and relied on by the Company's banking regulators as a measure of capital adequacy, but are considered "non-GAAP financial measures" for SEC purposes. See "Capital Ratios," "Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines" and "Tangible Common Equity" below for additional information on these measures.

        The Company may also augment its capital through issuances of common stock, convertible preferred stock, preferred stock, subordinated debt underlying trust preferred securities, and equity issued through awards under employee benefit plans. Future business results of the Company, including events such as corporate dispositions, also affect the Company's capital levels. Moreover, changes that the FASB has adopted regarding off-balance sheet assets, consolidation and sale treatment will have an incremental impact on Citi's capital ratios. For more information on this, see Note 1 "Future Application of Accounting Standards" and Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, including "Funding, Liquidity Facilities and Subordinate Interests."

Capital is used primarily to support assets in the Company's businesses and to absorb expected and unexpected market, credit or operational losses. The Company's potential further uses ofWhile capital particularlymay be used for other purposes, such as to pay dividends andor repurchase common stock, became severelythe Company's ability to utilize its capital for these purposes is currently restricted during the latter half of 2008due to its participation in TARP and during 2009, to date,other government programs, as explained more fully in the Company's 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K and its Quarterly ReportReports on Form 10-Q for the quarterquarters ended June 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, and as discussed in this MD&A.respectively.

        Citigroup's capital management framework is designed to ensure that Citigroup and its principal subsidiaries maintain sufficient capital consistent with the Company's risk profile, all applicable regulatory standards and guidelines, and external rating agency considerations. The capital management process is centrally overseen by senior management and is reviewed at the consolidated, legal entity and country level.

        Senior management oversees the capital management process of Citigroup and its principal subsidiaries mainly through Citigroup's Finance and Asset and Liability Committee (FinALCO). The Committee is composed of the senior-most management of Citigroup for the purpose of engaging management in decision-making and related discussions on capital and liquidity matters. Among other things, the Committee's responsibilities include: determining the financial structure of Citigroup and its principal subsidiaries; ensuring that Citigroup and its regulated entities are adequately capitalized; determining appropriate asset levels and return hurdles for Citigroup and individual businesses; reviewing the funding and capital markets plan for Citigroup; and monitoring interest-rate risk, corporate and bank liquidity and the impact of currency translation on non-U.S. earnings and capital.

        Certain of the capital measures discussed in this section, including Tier 1 Common, Tangible Common Equity (TCE) and related ratios, are non-GAAP financial measures. See "Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines" and "Tangible Common Equity" below for additional information on these measures, including a reconciliation of these measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures.

Exchange Offers

        Upon completion of the public and private exchange offers (see "Events in 2009—Public and Private Exchange Offers" above), an aggregate of approximately $58 billion in aggregate liquidation value of outstanding preferred stock and trust preferred securities, including an aggregate $25 billion liquidation value of preferred stock held by the UST, was exchanged for Citigroup common stock and/or interim securities convertible into Citi common stock. In addition, an additional approximately $27.1 billion in aggregate liquidation value of preferred stock held by the USG was exchanged for newly issued 8% trust preferred securities. As a result of these exchanges, Citigroup's Tier 1 Common will increase by approximately $64 billion and its Tier 1 Common ratio will increase to approximately 9%, each based on June 30, 2009 levels. In addition, the Company's TCE will increase by approximately $60 billion to approximately $100 billion. See "Events in 2009—Public and Private Exchange Offers" and "Subsequent Events" above for an additional discussion of the capital impact of the exchange offers on Citi.

        Future business results of the Company, including events such as corporate dispositions, will continue to affect the Company's capital levels. Moreover, changes that the FASB has adopted regarding off-balance sheet assets, consolidation and sale treatment will have an incremental impact on Citi's capital ratios. For more information on this, see Note 1 "Future Application of Accounting Standards" and Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, including "Funding, Liquidity Facilities and Subordinate Interests."


Table of Contents

Capital Ratios

        Citigroup is subject to risk-based capital guidelines issued by the Federal Reserve Board (FRB). CapitalFRB. Historically, capital adequacy ishas been measured, in part, based on two risk-based capital ratios, the Tier 1 and Total Capital (Tier 1 + Tier 2 Capital) ratios. Tier 1 Capital consists of core capital, while Total Capital also includes other items such as subordinated debt and allowance for credit losses. Both measures of capital adequacy are stated as a percentage of risk-weighted assets. In conjunction with the conclusion of the Supervisory Capital Assessment Program (SCAP), the banking regulators developed a new measure of capital called Tier 1 Common defined as Tier 1 Capital less non-common elements including qualifying perpetual preferred stock, qualifying noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries and qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts.

        Citigroup's risk-weighted assets are principally derived from application of the risk-based capital guidelines related to the measurement of credit risk, under which on-balance sheet assets and the credit equivalent amount of certain off-balance sheet exposures (such as financial guarantees, unfunded lending commitments, letters of credit, and derivatives) are assigned to one of several prescribed risk weight categories based upon the perceived credit risk associated with the obligor, or if relevant, the guarantor, the nature of the collateral, or external credit ratings. Risk-weighted assets also incorporate a measure for market risk on covered trading account positions, and all foreign exchange and commodity positions whether or not carried in the trading account. Excluded from risk-weighted assets are any assets, such as goodwill and deferred tax assets, to the extent required to be deducted from regulatory capital. See "Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines" below.

        Citigroup is also subject to a Leverage ratio requirement, a non-risk-based measure of capital adequacy, which is defined as Tier 1 Capital as a percentage of quarterly adjusted average total assets.

        To be "well capitalized" under federal bank regulatory agency definitions, a bank holding company must have a Tier 1 Capital ratio of at least 6%, a Total Capital ratio of at least 10%, and a Leverage Ratio of at least 3%, and not be subject to an FRB directive to maintain higher capital levels. As noted in the table below, Citigroup was "well capitalized" under these federal bank regulatory agency definitions as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.

        In addition, in conjunction with the conclusion of the Supervisory Capital Assessment Program (SCAP), the results of which were released by the USG on May 7, 2009, the banking regulators developed a new measure of capital called Tier 1 Common defined as Tier 1 Capital less non-common elements including qualifying perpetual preferred stock, qualifying noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries and qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts.

The following table sets forth Citigroup's regulatory capital ratios as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.


Table of Contents

Citigroup Regulatory Capital Ratios

 
 Jun. 30,
2009
 Dec. 31,
2008
 

Tier 1 Common

  2.75% 2.30%

Tier 1 Capital

  12.74  11.92 

Total Capital (Tier 1 and Tier 2)

  16.62  15.70 

Leverage(1)

  6.92  6.08 
      

 
 Sept. 30,
2009
 Dec. 31,
2008
 

Tier 1 Common

  9.12% 2.30%

Tier 1 Capital

  12.76  11.92 

Total Capital (Tier 1 and Tier 2)

  16.58  15.70 

Leverage(1)

  6.87  6.08 
      

(1)
Tier 1 Capital divided by each period's quarterly adjusted average total assets.

Table        As noted in the table above, Citigroup was "well capitalized" under the federal bank regulatory agency definitions as of ContentsSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.

Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines

In millions of dollars Jun. 30,
2009
 Dec. 31,
2008(1)
 
Tier 1 Common       
Citigroup common stockholders' equity $78,001 $70,966 
Less: Net unrealized losses on securities available-for-sale, net of tax(2)  (7,055) (9,647)
Less: Accumulated net losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax  (3,665) (5,189)
Less: Pension liability adjustment, net of tax(3)  (2,611) (2,615)
Less: Cumulative effect included in fair value of financial liabilities attributable to the change in own credit worthiness, net of tax(4)  2,496  3,391 
Less: Disallowed deferred tax assets(5)  24,448  23,520 
Less: Intangible assets:       
 Goodwill(6)  26,111  27,132 
 Other disallowed intangible assets(6)  10,023  10,607 
Other  (893) (840)
      
Total Tier 1 Common $27,361 $22,927 
      
Qualifying perpetual preferred stock $74,301 $70,664 
Qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts  24,034  23,899 
Qualifying noncontrolling interests  1,082  1,268 
      
Total Tier 1 Capital $126,778 $118,758 
      
Tier 2 Capital       
Allowance for credit losses(7) $12,769 $12,806 
Qualifying subordinated debt(8)  25,208  24,791 
Net unrealized pretax gains on available-for- sale equity securities(2)  669  43 
      
Total Tier 2 Capital $38,646 $37,640 
      
Total Capital (Tier 1 and Tier 2) $165,424 $156,398 
      
Risk-Weighted Assets(9) $995,414 $996,247 
      

In millions of dollars Sept. 30,
2009
 Dec. 31,
2008(1)
 

Tier 1 Common

       

Citigroup common stockholders' equity

 $140,530 $70,966 

Less: Net unrealized losses on securities available-for-sale, net of tax(2)

  (4,242) (9,647)

Less: Accumulated net losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax

  (4,177) (5,189)

Less: Pension liability adjustment, net of tax(3)

  (2,619) (2,615)

Less: Cumulative effect included in fair value of financial liabilities attributable to the change in own credit worthiness, net of tax(4)

  1,862  3,391 

Less: Disallowed deferred tax assets(5)

  21,917  23,520 

Less: Intangible assets:

       
 

Goodwill(6)

  26,436  27,132 
 

Other disallowed intangible assets(6)

  10,179  10,607 

Other

  (892) (840)
      

Total Tier 1 Common

 $90,282 $22,927 
      

Qualifying perpetual preferred stock

 $312 $70,664 

Qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts

  34,403  23,899 

Qualifying noncontrolling interests

  1,288  1,268 
      

Total Tier 1 Capital

 $126,285 $118,758 
      

Tier 2 Capital

       

Allowance for credit losses(7)

 $12,701 $12,806 

Qualifying subordinated debt(8)

  24,355  24,791 

Net unrealized pretax gains on available-for- sale equity securities(2)

  753  43 
      

Total Tier 2 Capital

 $37,809 $37,640 
      

Total Capital (Tier 1 and Tier 2)

 $164,094 $156,398 
      

Risk-Weighted Assets(9)

 $989,711 $996,247 
      

(1)
Reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

(2)
Tier 1 Capital excludes net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt securities and net unrealized gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair values, in accordance with risk-based capital guidelines. In arriving at Tier 1 Capital, banking organizations are required to deduct net unrealized losses on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair values, net of tax. Banking organizations are permitted to include in Tier 2 Capital up to 45% of pretax net unrealized gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair values.

(3)
The FRB granted interim capital relief for the impact of adopting SFAS 158 (ASC 715-20-65)ASC 715-20-65 (SFAS 158).

(4)
The impact of including Citigroup's own credit rating in valuing liabilities for which the fair value option has been elected is excluded from Tier 1 Capital, in accordance with risk-based capital guidelines.

(5)
Of the Company's approximately $42$38 billion of net deferred tax assets at JuneSeptember 30, 2009, approximately $13 billion of such assets were includable without limitation in regulatory capital pursuant to risk-based capital guidelines, while approximately $24$22 billion of such assets exceeded the limitation imposed by these guidelines and, as "disallowed deferred tax assets," were deducted in arriving at Tier 1 Capital. The Company's other approximately $5$3 billion of net deferred tax assets at JuneSeptember 30, 2009 primarily represented the deferred tax effects of unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt securities, which are permitted to be excluded prior to deriving the amount of net deferred tax assets subject to limitation under the guidelines. The Company had approximately $24 billion of disallowed deferred tax assets at December 31, 2008.

(6)
Includes goodwill/intangible assets of related to assets of discontinued operations held for sale and assets held for sale.

(7)
Includable up to 1.25% of risk-weighted assets. Any excess allowance is deducted in arriving at risk-weighted assets.

(8)
Includes qualifying subordinated debt in an amount not exceeding 50% of Tier 1 Capital.

(9)
Includes risk-weighted credit equivalent amounts, net of applicable bilateral netting agreements, of $76.9$70.3 billion for interest rate, commodity, and equity derivative contracts, foreign-exchange contracts, and credit derivatives as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009, compared with $102.9 billion as of December 31, 2008. Market-risk-equivalent assets included in risk-weighted assets amounted to $78.2$91.1 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and $101.8 billion at December 31, 2008. Risk-weighted assets also include the effect of certain other off-balance sheet exposures, such as unused lending commitments and letters of credit, and reflect deductions for certain intangible assets and any excess allowance for credit losses.

Recent Actions Impacting Citigroup's Risk-Weighted Assets

        All three of Citigroups'sCitigroup's primary credit card securitization trusts—the Master Trust, Omni Trust and Broadway Trust—had bonds placed on ratings watch with negative implications by rating agencies during the first and second quarters of 2009. As a result of the ratings watch status, certain actions were taken by Citi with respect to each of the trusts. In general, the actions subordinated certain senior interests in the trust assets that were retained by Citi, which effectively placed these interests below investor interests in terms of priority of payment.

        With respect to the Master Trust, in the first quarter of 2009, Citi subordinated a portion of its "seller's interest",interest," which represents a senior interest in trust receivables, thus making those cash flows available to pay investor couponcoupons each month. In addition, during the second quarter of 2009, a subordinated note with a $3 billion principal amount was issued by the Master Trust and retained by Citibank (South Dakota), N.A., in order to provide additional credit support for the senior note classes. The note is classified as a held-to-maturity investment security.

        With respect to the Omni Trust, in the second quarter of 2009, subordinated notes with a principal amount of $2 billion were issued by the trust and retained by Citibank (South Dakota), N.A., in order to provide additional credit support for the senior note classes. The notes are classified as Trading account assets. These notes are in addition to a $265 million subordinated note issued by Omni Trust and retained by Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. in the fourth quarter of 2008 for the same purpose of providing additional credit support for senior noteholders.

        With respect to the Broadway Trust, in the second quarter of 2009, subordinated notes with a principal amount of $82 million were issued by the trust and retained by Citibank, N.A., in order to provide additional credit support for the senior note classes. The notes are classified as Trading account assets.

        As a result of these actions, based on the applicable regulatory capital rules, Citigroup included the sold assets of the Master and Omni Trusts (commencing with the first quarter of


Table of Contents

2009) and the Broadway Trust (commencing with the second quarter of 2009) in its risk-weighted assets for purposes of calculating its risk-based capital ratios. The effect of this changethese changes increased Citigroup's risk-weighted assets by approximately $82 billion, and decreased Citigroup's Tier 1 Capital ratio by approximately 100 bps,basis points, each as of March 31, 2009, with respect to the Master and Omni Trusts. The inclusion of the Broadway Trust increased Citigroup's risk-weighted assets by an additional approximately $900 million at June 30, 2009. All bond ratings for each of the trusts have been


Table of Contents

affirmed by the rating agencies, and no downgrades have occurred as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009.


Common Equity

        Citigroup's common stockholders' equity increased by approximately $7.0$70 billion to $78$141 billion, and represented 4.2%7.4% of total assets as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009, from $71 billion and 3.7% at December 31, 2008.

        The table below summarizes the change in Citigroup's common stockholders' equity during the first sixnine months of 2009:

In billions of dollars  
 

Common equity, December 31, 2008

 $71.0 

Net income

  5.9 

Employee benefit plans and other activities

  0.1 

Dividends

  (2.6)

Net change in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

  3.6 
    

Common equity, June 30, 2009

 $78.0 
    

In billions of dollars  
 

Common equity, December 31, 2008

 $71.0 

Net income(1)

  6.0 

Employee benefit plans and other activities

  0.5 

Dividends

  (3.4)

Exchange offers(1)

  58.9 

Net change in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

  7.5 
    

Common equity, September 30, 2009

 $140.5 
    

(1)
Net income includes $0.9 billion related to the conversion of trust preferred securities held by public investors into common stock as described under "Significant Events in the Third Quarter of 2009—Exchange Offers" above.

        As of JuneSeptember 30, 2009, $6.7 billion of stock repurchases remained under authorized repurchase programs after noprograms. No material repurchases were made in 2008 and the first sixnine months of 2009. Under various of its agreements with the USG, the Company is restricted from repurchasing common stock, subject to certain exceptions, including in the ordinary course of business as part of employee benefit programs. In addition, in accordance with its recent exchange agreements with the USG, Citigroup agreed not to pay a quarterly common stock dividend exceeding $0.01 per share per quarter for so long as the USG holds any debt or equity security of Citigroup (or any affiliate thereof) acquired by the USG in connection with the public and private exchange offers (without the consent of the USG). See "Events in 2009—Public and Private Exchange Offers" above. Any such dividend on Citi's outstanding common stock would need to be made in compliance with Citi's obligations to any remaining outstanding preferred stock.

Tangible Common Equity

        Citigroup's management believes TCE is useful because it is a measure utilized by regulators and market analysts in evaluating a company's financial condition and capital strength.        TCE, as defined by Citigroup, representsCommon equity lessGoodwill andIntangible assets (excluding MSRs) net of therelated net deferred tax liabilities. Other companies may calculate TCE in a manner different from Citigroup. Citi's TCE was $40.0$102.3 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and $31.1 billion at December 31, 2008.

        The TCE ratio (TCE divided by risk-weighted assets, assets—see "Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines" above) was 4.0%10.3% at JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 3.1% at December 31, 2008. A reconciliation of Citigroup's total stockholders' equity to TCE follows:

In millions of dollars, except ratio June 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

Total Citigroup Stockholders' Equity

 $152,302 $141,630 

Less:

       
 

Preferred Stock

  74,301  70,664 
      

Common Equity

 $78,001 $70,966 

Less:

       
 

Goodwill—as reported

  25,578  27,132 
 

Intangible Assets (other than MSRs)—as reported

  10,098  14,159 
 

Goodwill and Intangible Assets—recorded as Assets of Discontinued Operations Held for Sale

  3,618   
  

Less: Related Net Deferred Tax Liabilities

  1,296  1,382 
      

Tangible Common Equity (TCE)

 $40,003 $31,057 
      

Tangible Assets

       

GAAP Assets

 $1,848,533 $1,938,470 

Less:

       
 

Goodwill—as reported

  25,578  27,132 
 

Intangible Assets (other than MSRs)—as reported

  10,098  14,159 
 

Goodwill and Intangible Assets— recorded as Assets of Discontinued Operations Held for Sale

  3,618   
 

Related deferred tax assets

  1,283  1,285 
      

Tangible Assets (TA)(1)

 $1,807,956 $1,895,894 
      

Risk-Weighted Assets (RWA) under"Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines"

 $995,414 $996,247 
      

TCE/TA RATIO

  2.2% 1.6%
      

TCE RATIO (TCE/RWA)

  4.0% 3.1%
      


(1)
GAAP Assets less Goodwill and Intangible Assets excluding MSRs, and the related deferred tax assets.
In millions of dollars, except ratio September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

Total Citigroup Stockholders' Equity

 $140,842 $141,630 

Less:

       
 

Preferred Stock

  312  70,664 
      

Common Equity

 $140,530 $70,966 

Less:

       
 

Goodwill—as reported

  25,423  27,132 
 

Intangible Assets (other than MSRs)—as reported

  8,957  14,159 
 

Goodwill and Intangible Assets—recorded as Assets of Discontinued Operations Held for Sale

  3,856   
 

Goodwill and Intangible Assets— recorded as Assets held-for-sale

  1,377   
  

Less: Related Net Deferred Tax Liabilities

  1,381  1,382 
      

Tangible Common Equity (TCE)

 $102,298 $31,057 
      

Tangible Assets

       

GAAP Assets—as reported

 $1,888,599 $1,938,470 

Less:

       
 

Goodwill—as reported

  25,423  27,132 
 

Intangible Assets (other than MSRs)—as reported

  8,957  14,159 
 

Goodwill and Intangible Assets— recorded as Assets of Discontinued Operations Held for Sale

  3,856   
 

Goodwill and Intangible Assets— recorded as Assets held-for-sale

  1,377   
 

Related deferred tax assets

  1,272  1,285 
      

Tangible Assets (TA)

 $1,847,714 $1,895,894 
      

Risk-Weighted Assets (RWA) under"Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines"

 $989,711 $996,247 
      

TCE/TA RATIO

  5.5% 1.6%
      

TCE RATIO (TCE/RWA)

  10.3% 3.1%
      

Table of Contents

Capital Resources of Citigroup's Depository Institutions

        Citigroup's U.S. subsidiary depository institutions in the U.S. are subject to risk-based capital guidelines issued by their respective primary federal bank regulatory agencies, which are similar to the FRB's guidelines. To be "well capitalized" under federal bankthese regulatory agency definitions, Citigroup's depository institutions must have a Tier 1 Capital ratio of at least 6%, a Total Capital (Tier 1 + Tier 2 Capital) ratio of at least 10% and a Leverage ratio of at least 5%, and not be subject to a regulatory directive to meet and maintain higher capital levels.

        At JuneSeptember 30, 2009, all of Citigroup's subsidiary depository institutions were "well capitalized" under federal bank regulatory agency definitions, including Citigroup's primary depository institution, Citibank, N.A., as noted in the following table:

Citibank, N.A. Components of Capital and Ratios Under Regulatory Guidelines

In billions of dollars Jun. 30,
2009
 Dec. 31,
2008
 

Tier 1 Capital

 $94.3 $71.0 

Total Capital (Tier 1 and Tier 2)

  112.5  108.4 
      

Tier 1 Capital Ratio

  14.58% 9.94%

Total Capital Ratio (Tier 1 and Tier 2)

  17.40  15.18 

Leverage Ratio(1)

  8.23  5.82 
      

In billions of dollars Sept. 30,
2009
 Dec. 31,
2008
 

Tier 1 Capital

 $95.8 $71.0 

Total Capital (Tier 1 and Tier 2)

  110.8  108.4 
      

Tier 1 Capital Ratio

  15.16% 9.94%

Total Capital Ratio (Tier 1 and Tier 2)

  17.53  15.18 

Leverage Ratio(1)

  8.37  5.82 
      

(1)
Tier 1 Capital divided by each period's quarterly adjusted average total assets.

        Citibank, N.A. had a net loss of $1.5$2.3 billion for the first sixnine months of 2009.

        In addition, during the first sixnine months of 2009, Citibank, N.A. received capital contributions from its immediate parent company, Citicorp, in the amount of $27.5$30.5 billion.

        Total subordinated notes issued to Citibank, N.A.'s immediate parent company, Citicorp, Holdings Inc. that were outstanding at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, and included in Citibank, N.A.'s Tier 2 Capital amounted to $9.5 billion anddeclined from $28.2 billion respectively,outstanding at December 31, 2008 to $6.5 billion outstanding at September 30, 2009, reflecting the redemption of $18.7$21.7 billion of subordinated notes in the first sixnine months of 2009.

        The significant events in the latter half of 2008 and the first sixnine months of 2009 impacting the capital of Citigroup also affected, or could affect, Citibank, N.A. Citibank, N.A.which is subject to separate banking regulation and examination.


Table of Contents

        The following table presents the estimated sensitivity of Citigroup's and Citibank, N.A.'s capital ratios to changes of $100 million of Tier 1 or Total Capital (numerator), or changes of $1 billion in risk-weighted assets or adjusted average total assets (denominator) based on financial information as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009. This information is provided solely for the purpose of analyzing the impact that a change in the Company's financial position or results of operations could have on these ratios. These sensitivities only consider a single change to either a component of capital, risk-weighted assets or adjusted average total assets. Accordingly, an event that affects more than one factor may have a larger basis-point impact than is reflected in this table.

 
 Tier 1 Common Ratio Tier 1 Capital Ratio Total Capital Ratio Leverage Ratio 
 
 Impact of $100
$100 million
change in
Tier 1
Common
 Impact of $1
$1 billion
change in
risk-weighted
assets
 Impact of $100
$100 million
change in
Tier 1
Capital
Impact of
$1 billion
change in
risk-weighted
assets
Impact of
$100 million
change in
total capital
Impact of
$1 billion
change in
risk-weighted
assets
Impact of
$100 million
change in
Tier 1 Capital
 Impact of $1
$billion change in
risk-weighted
assets
Impact of $100
million change in
total capital
Impact of $1
billion change in
risk-weighted
assets
Impact of $100
million change in
Tier 1 Capital
Impact of $1
billion
change in
adjusted average
total
assets
 

Citigroup

  1.0 bps  0.30.9 bps  1.0 bps  1.3 bps  1.0 bps  1.7 bps  0.60.5 bps  0.4 bps 
                  

Citibank, N.A. 

      1.51.6 bps  2.32.4 bps  1.51.6 bps  2.72.8 bps  0.9 bps  0.7 bps 
                  

Broker-Dealer Subsidiaries

        At JuneSeptember 30, 2009, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc., had net capital, computed in accordance with the SEC's net capital rule, of $8.1$9.1 billion, which exceeded the minimum requirement by $7.5$8.4 billion.

        In addition, certain of the Company's broker-dealer subsidiaries are subject to regulation in the other countries in which they do business, including requirements to maintain specified levels of net capital or its equivalent. The Company's broker-dealer subsidiaries were in compliance with their capital requirements at JuneSeptember 30, 2009. The requirements applicable to these subsidariessubsidiaries in the U.S. and in particular other jurisdictions are the subject toof political debate and potential change in light of recent events.

Regulatory Capital Standards Developments

        Citigroup supports the move to a new set of risk-based capital standards, published on June 26, 2004 (and subsequently amended in November 2005) by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, consisting of central banks and bank supervisors from 13 countries. The international version of the Basel II framework will allow Citigroup to leverage internal risk models used to measure credit, operational, and market risk exposures to drive regulatory capital calculations.

        On December 7, 2007, the U.S. banking regulators published the rules for large banks to comply with Basel II in the U.S. These rules require Citigroup, as a large and internationally active bank, to comply with the most advanced Basel II approaches for calculating credit and operational risk capital requirements. The U.S. implementation timetable consists of a parallel calculation period under the current regulatory capital regime (Basel I) and Basel II, starting anytime between April 1, 2008 and April 1, 2010, followed by a three-year transition period, typically starting 12 months after the beginning of parallel reporting. The U.S. regulators have reserved the right to change how Basel II is applied in the U.S. following a review at the end of the second year of the transitional period, and to retain the existing prompt corrective action and leverage capital requirements applicable to banking organizations in the U.S.

The Company intends to implement Basel II within the timeframe required by the final rules. The Basel II (or its successor) requirements are the subject of political debate and potential change in light of recent events.


Table of Contents


FUNDING AND LIQUIDITY

Overview

        Because Citigroup is a bank holding company, substantially all of its net earnings are generated within its operating subsidiaries. These subsidiaries make funds available to Citigroup, primarily in the form of dividends. CertainCitigroup's liquidity management is structured to optimize the free flow of funds through the Company's legal and regulatory structure; however, various constraints, discussed below, limit certain subsidiaries' dividend-paying abilities mayabilities. Consistent with these constraints, Citigroup's primary objectives for liquidity management are established by entity and in aggregate across three main operating entities, as follows: (i) Citigroup, as the parent holding company; (ii) banking subsidiaries; and (iii) non-banking subsidiaries.

Citigroup

        As a result of continued deleveraging, deposit growth, term securitization under government and non-government programs, and the issuance of long-term debt under government guarantees and non-guaranteed debt, over the last several quarters, Citigroup has substantially increased its cash balances and reduced its short-term borrowings. In addition, as of September 30, 2009, Citigroup had largely eliminated utilization of short-term government funding programs.

        Beginning in October 2008, Citi and certain of its subsidiaries participated in the FDIC's TLGP pursuant to which certain qualifying senior unsecured debt issued by such entities is guaranteed, pursuant to the applicable time period, in amounts up to 125% of the qualifying debt for each qualifying entity (see "Government Programs—FDIC's Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program" above). As of September 30, 2009, Citigroup and its affiliates have issued a total of approximately $54.7 billion of long-term debt that is covered under the FDIC guarantee. Also as of September 30, 2009, Citigroup, through its subsidiaries, has issued approximately $4.37 billion in commercial paper and interbank deposits backed by the FDIC program.

        The TLGP expired on October 31, 2009 and Citigroup and its affiliates have elected not to participate in any FDIC- approved extension of the program. In anticipation of the expiration of the program, and as market conditions began to improve, Citigroup and its first tier subsidiaries have issued $20 billion of non-guaranteed debt outside of TLGP over the past six months. Such issuances have been at various maturities, with a weighted average maturity of over 10 years, in multiple currencies. In addition, beginning October 1, 2009, Citigroup has been issuing commercial paper, of any tenor, outside of the TLGP and the Company currently anticipates that commercial paper will continue to be limited by covenant restrictions in credit agreements, regulatory requirements and/or rating-agency requirements that also impact their capitalizationan important funding source during 2010, although not at 2008/2009 levels.

        As discussed in more detail in the Company's 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K, global financial markets faced unprecedented disruption in the latter part of 2008. CitigroupAt September 30, 2009, long-term debt and other U.S. financial services firms are currently benefiting from government programs that are improving markets and providing Citigroup and other institutions with significant current funding capacity and significant liquidity support. See "TARP and Other Regulatory Programs" above.

        In addition to the above programs, since the middle of 2007, the Company has taken a series of actions to reduce potential funding risks related to short-term market dislocations. The amount of commercial paper outstanding was reducedfor Citigroup, CGMHI, Citigroup Funding Inc. (CFI) and other Citigroup subsidiaries, collectively, were as follows:

In billions of dollars Citigroup
parent
company
 CGMHI(1) CFI(1) Other
Citigroup
Subsidiaries
 

Long-term debt

 $215.0 $15.4 $51.2 $98.0(2)

Commercial paper

 $ $ $10.0 $0.4 
          

(1)
Citigroup guarantees all of CFI's debt and CGMHI's publicly issued securities.

(2)
At September 30, 2009, approximately $30.6 billion relates to collateralized advances from the weighted-average maturity was extended,Federal Home Loan Bank.

        The table below details the parent companylong-term debt issuances of Citigroup during the past four quarters.

In billions of dollars 4Q08 1Q09 2Q09 3Q09 Total 

Debt issued under TLGP guarantee

 $5.8 $21.9 $17.0 $10.0 $54.7 

Debt issued without TLGP guarantee:

                
 

Citigroup parent company/CFI

  0.3  2.0  7.4  12.6  22.3 
 

Other Citigroup subsidiaries

  0.5  0.5  10.1(1) 7.9(2) 19.0 
            

Total

 $6.6 $24.4 $34.5 $30.5 $96.0 
            

(1)
Includes $8.5 billion issued by The Student Loan Corporation through the U.S. government sponsored Department of Education Conduit Facility, and $1 billion issued by Citigroup Pty. Ltd. in Australia and guaranteed by the Commonwealth of Australia.

(2)
Includes $3.3 billion issued by The Student Loan Corporation through the U.S. government sponsored Department of Education Conduit Facility, and $1 billion issued by Citigroup Pty. Ltd. in Australia and guaranteed by the Commonwealth of Australia.

        See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further detail on Citigroup's and its affiliates' long-term debt and commercial paper outstanding.

        Outside of long-term debt funding, Citi has been actively building its structural liquidity portfolio (a portfolioin two important ways. First, Citi has focused on growing a geographically diverse retail and corporate deposit base which stood at approximately $833 billion as of cashSeptember 30, 2009, up $28 billion compared to June 30, 2009. On a volume basis, deposit increases were noted in Regional Consumer Banking, particularly in North America, and highly liquid securities)in Transaction Services due to growth in all regions and broker-dealer "cash box" (unencumbered cash deposits) werestrength in Treasury and Trade Solutions, excluding the impact of foreign exchange on a volume basis. Citi's deposit base has increased substantially,sequentially over each of the last five quarters. These deposits are diversified across products and regions, with approximately 61% outside of the amountU.S. This diversification provides the Company with an important and low-cost source of unsecured overnight bank borrowings was reduced.funding. A significant portion of these deposits has been, and is currently expected to be, long-term and stable and is considered to be core.

        Second, total assets as of September 30, 2009 have declined 8% as compared to September 30, 2008. Loans, which are one of the Company's most illiquid assets, are down $107 billion, or approximately 15%.


Table of Contents

        As of JuneSeptember 30, 2009, the parent companyCitigroup and affiliates liquidity portfolio and broker-dealer "cash box" totaled $65.0$76.0 billion as compared with $66.8 billion at December 31, 2008 and $64.8$50.5 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2008. In addition, as of June 30, 2009,2008, and Citigroup's bank subsidiaries had an aggregate of approximately $110$148.8 billion of cash on deposit with major Central Banks (including the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the European Central Bank, Bank of England, Swiss National Bank and Bank of Japan). This compares, compared with approximately $72 billion at December 31, 2008. These amounts are in addition to cash deposited from the broker-dealer "cash box" noted above. Citigroup's bank subsidiaries also have significant additional liquidity resources through unencumbered highly liquid securities and other assets available for secured funding through private markets or that are, or could be, pledged to the major Central Banks and the U.S. Federal Home Loan Banks.

        These actions to reduce funding risks, the reduction The liquidity value of the balance sheetliquid securities was $59.4 billion at September 30, 2009 compared with $53.3 billion at June 30, 2009. Significant amounts of cash and liquid securities are also available in other Citigroup entities.

        As a result of the actions described above and the substantial support provided by U.S. government programs have allowed theCompany's current funding levels, management currently believes Citi is largely pre-funded heading into 2010, with a deliberately liquid and flexible balance sheet. The combined parent and broker-dealer entities to maintain sufficient liquidity to meet all maturing unsecured debt obligations due within a one-year time horizon, without accessing the unsecured markets.

        Citigroup's funding sources are diversified across funding types and geography, a benefit of its global franchise. Funding for Citigroup and its major operating subsidiaries includes a geographically diverse retail and corporate deposit base of approximately $804.7 billion at June 30, 2009. These deposits are diversified across products and regions, with approximately two-thirds of them outside of the U.S. This diversification provides the Company with an important and low-cost source of funding. A significant portion of these deposits has been, and is currently expected to be, long term and stable, and is considered to be core.

        During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, the Company's deposit base increased by $42 billion compared to March 31, 2009, approximately half of which was due to FX translation. On a volume basis, deposit increases were noted in Regional Consumer Banking, particularly in North America, and in Global Transaction Services due to growth in all regions and strength in Treasury and Trade Solutions. These increases were partially offset by declines in Securities and Banking related to reduction of higher cost wholesale deposits.

Banking SubsidiariesSubsidiaries—Constraints on Dividends

        There are various legal limitations on the ability of Citigroup's subsidiary depository institutions to extend credit, pay dividends or otherwise supply funds to Citigroup and its non-bank subsidiaries. Currently, the approval of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency,OCC, in the case of national banks, or the Office of Thrift Supervision, in the case of federal savings banks, is required if total dividends declared in any calendar year exceed amounts specified by the applicable agency's regulations. State-chartered depository institutions are subject to dividend limitations imposed by applicable state law.

        In determining the declaration of dividends, each depository institution must also consider its effect on applicable risk-based capital and leverage ratio requirements, as well as policy statements of the federal regulatory agencies that indicate that banking organizations should generally pay dividends out of current operating earnings. Citigroup did not receive any dividends from its banking subsidiaries during the secondthird quarter of 2009.

Non-Banking SubsidiariesSubsidiaries—Constraints on Dividends

        Citigroup receives dividends from its non-bank subsidiaries. TheseCitigroup's non-bank subsidiaries, including Citigroup Global Market Holdings Inc. (CGMHI), are generally not subject to regulatory restrictions on dividends. However, the ability of CGMHI to declare dividends can be restricted by capital considerations of its broker-dealer subsidiaries.

        CGMHI's consolidated balance sheet is liquid, with the vast majority of its assets consisting of marketable securities and collateralized short-term financing agreements arising from securities transactions. CGMHI monitors and evaluates the adequacy of its capital and borrowing base on a daily basis to maintain liquidity and to ensure that its capital base supports the regulatory capital requirements of its subsidiaries.

        Some of Citigroup's non-bank subsidiaries, including CGMHI, have credit facilities with Citigroup's subsidiary depository institutions, including Citibank, N.A. Borrowings under these facilities must be secured in accordance with Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act. There are various legal restrictions on the extent to which a bank holding company and certain of its non-bank subsidiaries can borrow or obtain credit from Citigroup's subsidiary depository institutions or engage in certain other transactions with them. In general, these restrictions require that transactions be on arm's lengtharm's-length terms and be secured by designated amounts of


Table of Contents

specified collateral. See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


        At June 30, 2009, long-term debt and commercial paper outstanding for Citigroup, CGMHI, Citigroup Funding Inc. (CFI) and other Citigroup subsidiaries, collectively, were as follows:

In billions of dollars Citigroup
parent
company
 CGMHI(1) CFI(1) Other
Citigroup
Subsidiaries
 

Long-term debt

 $192.3 $15.1 $44.1 $96.5(2)

Commercial paper

 $ $ $27.9 $0.6 
          

(1)
Citigroup guarantees all

®Table of CFI's debt and CGMHI's publicly issued securities.

(2)
At June 30, 2009, approximately $38.5 billion relates to collateralized advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank.

        The table below details the long-term debt issuances of Citigroup during the past three quarters.Contents

In billions of dollars 4Q08 1Q09 2Q09 Total 

Debt issued under TLGP guarantee

 $5.8 $21.9 $17.0 $44.7 

Debt issued without TLGP guarantee

  0.8  2.5  17.5(1) 20.8 
          

Total

 $6.6 $24.4 $34.5 $65.5 
          

(1)
Includes $8.5 billion issued through the U.S. Government sponsored Department of Education Conduit Facility, and $1 billion issued by Citibank Pty. Ltd. Australia and guaranteed by the Commonwealth of Australia.

        See "TARP and Other Regulatory Programs—FDIC Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program" regarding FDIC guarantees of certain long-term debt and commercial paper and interbank deposits. See also Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further detail on Citigroup's (and its affiliates') long-term debt and commercial paper outstanding.

Credit Ratings

        Citigroup's ability to access the capital markets and other sources of wholesale funds is currently significantly subject to government funding and liquidity support. Any ability to access the capital markets or other sources of funds, as well as the cost of these funds and its ability to maintain certain deposits, is highly dependent on its credit ratings. The table below indicates the current ratings for Citigroup.

        On November 24, 2008, Fitch Ratings lowered Citigroup Inc.'s Generally, since May of 2009, Citigroup's ratings have largely been consistent and Citibank, N.A.'s senior debt rating to "A+" from "AA-." In doing so, Fitch removed the rating from "Watch Negative" and applied a "Stable Outlook."

        On February 27, 2009, Moody's Investors Service lowered Citigroup Inc.'s senior debt rating to "A3" from "A2" and Citibank, N.A.'s long-term rating to "A1" from "Aa3." In doing so, Moody's removed the ratings from "Under Review for possible downgrade" and applied a "Stable Outlook."

        On December 19, 2008, Standard & Poor's lowered Citigroup Inc.'s senior debt rating to "A" from "AA-" and Citibank, N.A.'s long-term rating to "A+" from "AA." In doing so, Standard & Poor's removed the rating from "CreditWatch Negative" and applied a "Stable Outlook." On December 19, 2008, Standard & Poor's also lowered the short-term and commercial paper ratings of Citigroup and Citibank, N.A. to "A-1" from "A-1+". On February 27, 2009, Standard & Poor's placed the ratings of Citigroup Inc. and its subsidiaries on "Negative Outlook." On May 4, 2009, Standard & Poor's placed the ratings of Citigroup Inc. and its subsidiaries on "Credit Watch Negative." On May 8, 2009, Standard & Poor's affirmed the ratings of Citigroup Inc. and its subsidiaries. In doing so, Standard & Poor's removed the rating from "Credit Watch Negative" and applied a "Stable Outlook."stable.

        As a result of the Citigroup guarantee, changes in ratings and ratings outlooks for Citigroup Funding Inc.CFI are the same as those of Citigroup noted above.

Citigroup's Debt Ratings as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009

 
 Citigroup Inc. Citigroup Funding Inc. Citibank, N.A. 
 
 Senior
debt
 Commercial
paper
 Senior
debt
 Commercial
paper
 Long-
term
 Short-
term
 

Fitch Ratings

 A+  F1+ A+  F1+ A+  F1+ 

Moody's Investors Service

 A3  P-1 A3  P-1 A1  P-1 

Standard & Poor's

 A  A-1 A  A-1 A+  A-1 
              

        Ratings downgrades by Fitch Ratings, Moody's Investors Service or Standard & Poor's have had and could continue to have impacts on funding and liquidity, and could also have further explicit impact on liquidity due to collateral triggers and other cash requirements. Because of the current credit ratings of Citigroup Inc., a one-notch downgrade of its senior debt/long-term rating would likely impact Citigroup Inc.'s commercial paper/short-term rating. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2009, a one-notch downgrade of the senior debt/long-term rating of Citigroup Inc., accompanied by a one-notch downgrade of Citigroup Inc.'s commercial paper/short-term rating, would result in an approximately $12.2$15.9 billion funding requirement in the form of collateral and cash obligations. Further, as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009, a one-notch downgrade of the senior debt/long-term ratings of Citibank, N.A. would result in an approximately $4.2$4.4 billion funding requirement in the form of collateral and cash obligations. Because of the current credit ratings of Citibank, N.A., a one-notch downgrade of its senior debt/long-term rating is unlikely to have any impact on its commercial paper/short-term rating.


Table        As a result of Contents

LIQUIDITY

        Citigroup's liquidity managementthe adoption of SFAS No. 166 and SFAS 167 (see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements), certain credit rating agencies have raised concerns about the loss of GAAP sale treatment in certain securitization transactions and the resulting effects under the FDIC's securitization rule. Specifically, under the FDIC's securitization rule, so long as a securitization is structuredaccounted for as a sale for GAAP purposes and certain other conditions are satisfied, the FDIC, when acting as conservator or receiver of an insolvent bank, will also treat the transferred assets as sold and thus surrender its rights to optimizereclaim the free flow of funds through the Company's legal and regulatory structure. Principal constraints relate to legal and regulatory limitations, sovereign risk and tax considerations. Consistent with these constraints, Citigroup's primary objectives for liquidity management are established by entity and in aggregate across three main operating entities as follows:

        Within this construct, there is a funding framework for the Company's activities. The primary benchmark for the Parent and Broker—Dealer Entities is that on a combined basis, Citigroup maintains sufficient liquidity to meet all maturing unsecured debt obligations due within a one-year time horizon without accessing the unsecured markets. The resulting "short-term ratio" is monitored on a daily basis.

        Startingfinancial assets transferred in the latter partsecuritization. With the adoption of 2008, seriousSFAS 166 and SFAS 167, GAAP sales treatment will be eliminated in certain securitizations, thus potentially putting securitized assets at risk of seizure by the FDIC in cases of conservatorship or receivership.

        The FDIC is considering a revision to its current regulations that would continue to recognize the legal isolation of securitized assets after the adoption of SFAS 166 and SFAS 167; however, it is unclear at this time what changes to the rules, if any, will be made or if the affected securitization structures will need to be modified in order to comply with those rules. If the FDIC does not act and/or if the affected securitization vehicles are unable to take appropriate steps to restructure their programs, the bond ratings of certain notes issued by these securitization vehicles, including Citi's credit and other market disruptions caused significant potential constraints on liquidity for financial institutions. Citigroup and other U.S. financial services firms are currently benefiting from government programscard securitization vehicles, could be lowered or withdrawn. In addition, these securitization vehicles may be unable to issue new bonds with a rating that are providing Citigroup and other institutions with significant liquidity support. See "TARP and Other Regulatory Programs" above.is higher than the sponsoring bank's then-current rating.


Table of Contents


OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

        Citigroup and its subsidiaries are involved with several types of off-balance sheet arrangements, including special purpose entities (SPEs), primarily in connection with securitization activities in Regional Consumer Banking and Local Consumer Lending. Citigroup and its subsidiaries use SPEs principally to obtain liquidity and favorable capital treatment by securitizing certain of Citigroup's financial assets, assisting clients in securitizing their financial assets and creating investment products for clients. For further information about the Company's securitization activities and involvement in SPEs, see Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

        The following tables describe certain characteristics of assets owned by certain identified significant unconsolidated variable interest entities (VIEs) as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009. These VIEs and the Company's exposure to the VIEs are described in Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

        See also Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Elimination of QSPEs and Changes in the Consolidation Model for Variable Interest Entities."

 
  
  
 Credit rating distribution 
Citi-Administered Asset-Backed Commercial Paper Conduits Total
assets
(in billions)
 Weighted
average
life
 AAA AA A BBB/BBB+
and below
 

 $44.7 4.3 years  41% 43% 13% 3%
              

 
  
  
 Credit rating distribution 
Citi-Administered Asset-Backed
Commercial Paper Conduits
 Total
assets
(in billions)
 Weighted
average
life
 AAA AA A BBB/BBB+
and below
 

 $39.7 4.55 years  41% 44% 11% 4%
              


Asset class % of total
portfolio
 

Student loans

  2931%

Trade receivables

  9%

Credit cards and consumer loans

  64%

Portfolio finance

  1211%

Commercial loans and corporate credit

  17%

Export finance

  1719%

Auto

  65%

Residential mortgage

  4%
    

Total

  100%
    

 

 
  
  
 Credit rating distribution 
 
 Total
assets
(in billions)
 Weighted
average
life
 
Collateralized Debt and Loan Obligations A or higher BBB BB/B CCC Unrated 

Collateralized debt obligations (CDOs)

 $15.9 4.0 years  27% 14% 13% 38% 8%

Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs)

 $20.7 5.5 years  1% 0% 53% 4% 42%
                

 
  
  
 Credit rating distribution 
Collateralized Debt and Loan
Obligations
 Total
assets
(in billions)
 Weighted
average
life
 A or higher BBB BB/B CCC Unrated 

Collateralized debt obligations (CDOs)

 $16.1 3.9 years  12% 12% 12% 49% 15%
                

Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs)

 $13.8 6.6 years  1% 1% 45% 8% 45%
                

 

 
 Credit rating distribution 
Municipal Securities Tender Option Bond Trusts (TOB) Total
assets
(in billions)
 Weighted
average
life
 AAA/Aaa AA/Aa1—
AA-/Aa3
 Less
than
AA-/Aa3
 

Customer TOB trusts (not consolidated)

 $8.3 12.1 years  13% 85% 2%

Proprietary TOB trusts (consolidated and non-consolidated)

 $19.5 17.4 years  11% 81% 8%

QSPE TOB trusts (not consolidated)

 $0.8 31.9 years  82% 18% 0%
            

 
 Credit rating distribution 
Municipal Securities Tender Option
Bond Trusts (TOB)
 Total
assets
(in billions)
 Weighted
average
life
 AAA/Aaa AA/Aa1 –
AA-/Aa3
 Less than
AA-/Aa3
 

Customer TOB trusts (not consolidated)

 $8.5 12.4 years  12% 85% 3%

Proprietary TOB trusts (consolidated and non-consolidated)

 $13.0 16.3 years  8% 77% 15%

QSPE TOB trusts (not consolidated)

 $0.7 10.9 years  88% 12% 0%
            

Table of Contents


CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

        See the Company's 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K and Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, herein, for a discussion of contractual obligations.


FAIR VALUATION

        For a discussion of fair value of assets and liabilities, see Note 17 and Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure

        The Company's management, with the participation of the Company's CEO and CFO, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and, based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that at that date the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Financial Reporting

        There were no changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

        When describing future business conditionsCertain statements in this Form 10-Q, including but not limited to descriptions instatements included within the section titled "Management's Discussion and Analysis," the Company makes certain statements that are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. TheGenerally, "forward-looking statements" are not based on historical facts but instead represent only the Company's actual resultsand management's beliefs regarding future events. Such statements may differ materially from those included in the forward-looking statements, which are indicatedbe identified by words such as "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "estimate," "may increase," "may fluctuate," and similar expressions, or future or conditional verbs such as "will," "should," "would,""would" and "could."

        These forward-lookingSuch statements are based on management's current expectations and involve external risksare subject to uncertainty and uncertaintieschanges in circumstances. Actual results may differ materially from those included in these statements due to a variety of factors, including but not limited to those described below:


Table of Contents

Citigroup Inc.

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
 Page No.

Financial Statements:

  
 

Consolidated Statement of Income (Unaudited)—Three and SixNine Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008

 
7487
 

Consolidated Balance Sheet—JuneSeptember 30, 2009 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2008

 
7588
 

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity (Unaudited)—SixNine Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008

 
7689
 

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited)—SixNine Months Ended JuneSept 30, 2009 and 2008

 
7891
 

Consolidated Balance Sheet—Citibank, N.A. and Subsidiaries—JuneSeptember 30, 2009 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2008

 
7992

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited):

  
 

Note 1—Basis of Presentation

 
8093
 

Note 2—Discontinued Operations

 
8699
 

Note 3—Business Segments

 
88101
 

Note 4—Interest Revenue and Expense

 
89102
 

Note 5—Commissions and Fees

 
90103
 

Note 6—Retirement Benefits

 
91104
 

Note 7—Restructuring

 
92105
 

Note 8—Earnings Per Share

 
94108
 

Note 9—Trading Account Assets and Liabilities

 
95109
 

Note 10—Investments

 
96110
 

Note 11—Goodwill and Intangible Assets

 
106120
 

Note 12—Debt

 
108122
 

Note 13—Preferred Stock

 
111125
 

Note 14—Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 
113127
 

Note 15—Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities

 
114128
 

Note 16—Derivatives Activities

 
135150
 

Note 17—Fair-Value Measurement (SFAS 157/ASC 820-10)

 
143158
 

Note 18—Fair-Value Elections (SFAS 155/ASC 815-15-25, SFAS 156/ASC 860-50-35 and SFAS 159/ASC 825-10)

 
156172
 

Note 19—Fair Value of Financial Instruments (SFAS 107/ASC 825-10-50)

 
162178
 

Note 20—Guarantees

 
163179
 

Note 21—Contingencies

 
168184
 

Note 22—Citibank, N.A. Equity (Unaudited)

 
169185
 

Note 23—Subsequent Events

 
170186
 

Note 24—Condensed Consolidating Financial Statement Schedules

 
170186

Table of Contents


CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CITIGROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME (Unaudited)

Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries

 
 Three months ended June 30 Six months ended June 30, 
In millions of dollars, except per share amounts 2009 2008(1) 2009 2008(1) 
Revenues             
Interest revenue $19,671 $27,337 $40,254 $56,498 
Interest expense  6,842  13,351  14,499  29,424 
          
Net interest revenue $12,829 $13,986 $25,755 $27,074 
          
Commissions and fees $5,437 $5,799 $9,605 $7,140 
Principal transactions  433  (5,802) 4,103  (12,434)
Administration and other fiduciary fees  1,472  2,197  3,078  4,398 
Realized gains (losses) on sales of investments  535  29  1,292  226 
Other-than-temporary impairment losses on investments(2)             
 Gross impairment losses  (2,329) (168) (3,708) (484)
 Less: Impairments recognized in OCI  1,634    2,265   
          
 Net impairment losses recognized in earnings $(695)$(168)$(1,443)$(484)
          
Insurance premiums  745  847  1,500  1,690 
Other revenue  9,213  650  10,600  2,085 
          
Total non-interest revenues $17,140 $3,552 $28,735 $2,621 
          
Total revenues, net of interest expense $29,969 $17,538 $54,490 $29,695 
          
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims             
Provision for loan losses $12,233 $6,983 $22,148 $12,560 
Policyholder benefits and claims  308  260  640  535 
Provision for unfunded lending commitments  135  (143) 195  (143)
          
Total provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims $12,676 $7,100 $22,983 $12,952 
          
Operating expenses             
Compensation and benefits $6,359 $8,692 $12,594 $17,254 
Premises and equipment  1,091  1,347  2,174  2,641 
Technology/communication  1,154  1,519  2,296  3,019 
Advertising and marketing  351  616  685  1,217 
Restructuring  (32) (44) (45) (29)
Other operating  3,076  3,084  5,980  6,489 
          
Total operating expenses $11,999 $15,214 $23,684 $30,591 
          
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes $5,294 $(4,776)$7,823 $(13,848)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  907  (2,447) 1,742  (6,333)
          
Income (loss) from continuing operations $4,387 $(2,329)$6,081 $(7,515)
          
Discontinued operations             
Income (loss) from discontinued operations $(279)$337 $(431)$391 
Gain (loss) on sale  14  (517) 2  (517)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  (123) (86) (170) (91)
          
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes $(142)$(94)$(259)$(35)
          
Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests $4,245 $(2,423)$5,822 $(7,550)
Net Income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests  (34) 72  (50) 56 
          
Citigroup's net income (loss) $4,279 $(2,495)$5,872 $(7,606)
          
Basic earnings per share(3)             
Income (loss) from continuing operations $0.51 $(0.53)$0.36 $(1.56)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes  (0.02) (0.02) (0.05) (0.01)
          
Net income (loss) $0.49 $(0.55)$0.31 $(1.57)
          
Weighted average common shares outstanding  5,399.5  5,287.4  5,392.3  5,186.5 
          
Diluted earnings per share(3)             
Income (loss) from continuing operations $0.51 $(0.53)$0.36 $(1.56)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes  (0.02) (0.02) (0.05) (0.01)
          
Net income (loss) $0.49 $(0.55)$0.31 $(1.57)
          
Adjusted weighted average common shares outstanding  5,967.8  5,776.8  5,960.6  5,676.3 
          

 
 Three months ended September 30, Nine months ended September 30, 
In millions of dollars, except per share amounts 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Revenues

             

Interest revenue

 $18,678 $26,130 $58,932 $82,628 

Interest expense

  6,680  12,726  21,179  42,150 
          

Net interest revenue

 $11,998 $13,404 $37,753 $40,478 
          

Commissions and fees

 $3,218 $3,208 $12,823 $10,348 

Principal transactions

  1,660  (3,013) 5,763  (15,447)

Administration and other fiduciary fees

  1,085  2,081  4,163  6,479 

Realized gains (losses) on sales of investments

  427  150  1,719  376 

Other-than-temporary impairment losses on investments(1)

             
 

Gross impairment losses

  (2,453) (755) (6,161) (1,239)
 

Less: Impairments recognized in OCI

  1,741    4,006   
          
 

Net impairment losses recognized in earnings

 $(712)$(755)$(2,155)$(1,239)
          

Insurance premiums

  763  823  2,263  2,513 

Other revenue

  1,951  360  12,551  2,445 
          

Total non-interest revenues

 $8,392 $2,854 $37,127 $5,475 
          

Total revenues, net of interest expense

 $20,390 $16,258 $74,880 $45,953 
          

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

             

Provision for loan losses

 $8,771 $8,943 $30,919 $21,503 

Policyholder benefits and claims

  324  274  964  809 

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

    (150) 195  (293)
          

Total provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 $9,095 $9,067 $32,078 $22,019 
          

Operating expenses

             

Compensation and benefits

 $6,136 $7,544 $18,730 $24,798 

Premises and equipment

  1,035  1,342  3,209  3,983 

Technology/communication

  1,114  1,515  3,410  4,534 

Advertising and marketing

  317  496  1,002  1,713 

Restructuring

  (34) 8  (79) (21)

Other operating

  3,256  3,102  9,236  9,591 
          

Total operating expenses

 $11,824 $14,007 $35,508 $44,598 
          

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

 $(529)$(6,816)$7,294 $(20,664)

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

  (1,122) (3,295) 620  (9,628)
          

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $593 $(3,521)$6,674 $(11,036)
          

Discontinued operations

             

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

 $(204)$507 $(635)$898 

Gain (loss) on sale

    9  2  (508)

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

  214  (97) 44  (188)
          

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

 $(418)$613 $(677)$578 
          

Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests

 $175 $(2,908)$5,997 $(10,458)

Net Income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  74  (93) 24  (37)
          

Citigroup's net income (loss)

 $101 $(2,815)$5,973 $(10,421)
          

Basic earnings per share(2)

             

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $(0.23)$(0.72)$(0.10)$(2.28)

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

  (0.04) 0.11  (0.09) 0.11 
          

Net income (loss)

 $(0.27)$(0.61)$(0.19)$(2.17)
          

Weighted average common shares outstanding

  12,104.3  5,341.8  7,629.6  5,238.3 
          

Diluted earnings per share(2)

             

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $(0.23)$(0.72)$(0.10)$(2.28)

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

  (0.04) 0.11  (0.09) 0.11 
          

Net income (loss)

 $(0.27)$(0.61)$(0.19)$(2.17)
          

Adjusted weighted average common shares outstanding

  12,216.0  5,831.1  8,045.7  5,727.9 
          

(1)
Reclassified to conform to current period's presentation.

(2)
For the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009, OTTI losses on investments are accounted for in accordance FSPASC 320-10-65-1 (FSP FAS 115-2 (ASC 320-10-65-1)115-2) (see "Accounting Changes" in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

(3)(2)
The Company adopted FSP EITF 03-6-1 (ASCASC 260-10-45 to 65)65 (FSP EITF 03-6-1) on January 1, 2009. All prior periods have been restated to conform to the current presentation. The Diluted EPS calculation for 2009 and 2008 utilizes Basic shares and Income available to common shareholders (Basic) due to the negative Income available to common shareholders. Using actual Diluted shares and Income available to common shareholders (Diluted) would result in anti-dilution.

See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


Table of Contents

CITIGROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries

In millions of dollars, except shares June 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 
 
 (Unaudited)
  
 

Assets

       

Cash and due from banks (including segregated cash and other deposits)

 $26,915 $29,253 

Deposits with banks

  182,577  170,331 

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell (including $73,755 and $70,305 as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value)

  179,503  184,133 

Brokerage receivables

  34,598  44,278 

Trading account assets (including $125,977 and $148,703 pledged to creditors at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively)

  325,037  377,635 

Investments (including $32,159 and $14,875 pledged to creditors at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively)

  266,757  256,020 

Loans, net of unearned income

       
 

Consumer (including $32 and $36 at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value)

  447,652  481,387 
 

Corporate (including $1,799 and $2,696 at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value)

  194,038  212,829 
      

Loans, net of unearned income

 $641,690 $694,216 
 

Allowance for loan losses

  (35,940) (29,616)
      

Total loans, net

 $605,750 $664,600 

Goodwill

  25,578  27,132 

Intangible assets (other than MSRs)

  10,098  14,159 

Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs)

  6,770  5,657 

Other assets (including $19,300 and $21,372 as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 respectively, at fair value)

  165,538  165,272 

Assets of discontinued operations held for sale

  19,412   
      

Total assets

 $1,848,533 $1,938,470 
      

Liabilities

       

Deposits

       
 

Non-interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices

 $82,854 $60,070 
 

Interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices (including $998 and $1,335 at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value)

  228,576  229,906 
      

Total U.S. deposits

 $311,430 $289,976 
 

Non-interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S. 

  40,389  37,412 
 

Interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S. (including $1,109 and $1,271 at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value)

  452,917  446,797 
      

Total international deposits

 $493,306 $484,209 
      

Total deposits

 $804,736 $774,185 

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase (including $116,133 and $138,866 as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value)

  172,016  205,293 

Brokerage payables

  52,696  70,916 

Trading account liabilities

  119,312  167,478 

Short-term borrowings (including $3,358 and $17,607 at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value)

  101,894  126,691 

Long-term debt (including $24,690 and $27,263 at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value)

  348,046  359,593 

Other liabilities (including $12,667 and $11,889 as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value)

  83,291  90,292 

Liabilities of discontinued operations held for sale

  12,374   
      

Total liabilities

 $1,694,365 $1,794,448 
      

Citigroup stockholders' equity

       

Preferred stock ($1.00 par value; authorized shares: 30 million), issued shares:835,632 at June 30, 2009, at aggregate liquidation value

 $74,301 $70,664 

Common stock ($0.01 par value; authorized shares: 15 billion), issued shares:5,671,743,807 at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. 

  57  57 

Additional paid-in capital

  16,663  19,165 

Retained earnings

  88,874  86,521 

Treasury stock, at cost:June 30, 2009—164,026,833 shares and December 31, 2008—221,675,719 shares

  (5,950) (9,582)

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

  (21,643) (25,195)
      

Total Citigroup stockholders' equity

 $152,302 $141,630 

Noncontrolling interest

  1,866  2,392 
      

Total equity

 $154,168 $144,022 
      

Total liabilities and equity

 $1,848,533 $1,938,470 
      

In millions of dollars, except shares September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 
 
 (Unaudited)
  
 

Assets

       

Cash and due from banks (including segregated cash and other deposits)

 $26,482 $29,253 

Deposits with banks

  217,730  170,331 

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell (including $87,886 and $70,305 as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value)

  197,357  184,133 

Brokerage receivables

  34,667  44,278 

Trading account assets (including $128,154 and $148,703 pledged to creditors at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively)

  340,697  377,635 

Investments (including $18,413 and $14,875 pledged to creditors at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively)

  261,890  256,020 

Loans, net of unearned income

       
 

Consumer (including $30 and $36 at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value)

  441,491  481,387 
 

Corporate (including $1,475 and $2,696 at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value)

  180,720  212,829 
      

Loans, net of unearned income

 $622,211 $694,216 
 

Allowance for loan losses

  (36,416) (29,616)
      

Total loans, net

 $585,795 $664,600 

Goodwill

  25,423  27,132 

Intangible assets (other than MSRs)

  8,957  14,159 

Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs)

  6,228  5,657 

Other assets (including $13,670 and $21,372 as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 respectively, at fair value)

  159,769  165,272 

Assets of discontinued operations held for sale

  23,604   
      

Total assets

 $1,888,599 $1,938,470 
      

Liabilities

       

Deposits

       
 

Non-interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices

 $77,460 $55,485 
 

Interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices (including $919 and $1,335 at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value)

  244,856  234,491 
      

Total U.S. deposits

 $322,316 $289,976 
 

Non-interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S. 

  40,606  37,412 
 

Interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S. (including $1,110 and $1,271 at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value)

  469,681  446,797 
      

Total international deposits

 $510,287 $484,209 
      

Total deposits

 $832,603 $774,185 

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase (including $116,693 and $138,866 as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value)

  178,159  205,293 

Brokerage payables

  57,672  70,916 

Trading account liabilities

  130,540  165,800 

Short-term borrowings (including $1,443 and $17,607 at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value)

  64,731  126,691 

Long-term debt (including $27,186 and $27,263 at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value)

  379,557  359,593 

Other liabilities (including $14,819 and $11,889 as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value)

  86,384  91,970 

Liabilities of discontinued operations held for sale

  16,004   
      

Total liabilities

 $1,745,650 $1,794,448 
      

Citigroup stockholders' equity

       

Preferred stock ($1.00 par value; authorized shares: 30 million), issued shares:12,038 at September 30, 2009, at aggregate liquidation value

 $312 $70,664 

Common stock ($0.01 par value; authorized shares: 60 billion), issued shares:23,044,331,654 and 5,671,743,807 at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. 

  230  57 

Additional paid-in capital

  78,802  19,165 

Retained earnings

  85,208  86,521 

Treasury stock, at cost:September 30, 2009—180,384,393 shares and December 31, 2008—221,675,719 shares

  (6,059) (9,582)

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

  (17,651) (25,195)
      

Total Citigroup stockholders' equity

 $140,842 $141,630 

Noncontrolling interest

  2,107  2,392 
      

Total equity

 $142,949 $144,022 
      

Total liabilities and equity

 $1,888,599 $1,938,470 
      

See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


Table of Contents

CITIGROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (Unaudited)

 
 Six Months Ended June 30, 
In millions of dollars, except shares in thousands 2009 2008 
Preferred stock at aggregate liquidation value       
Balance, beginning of period $70,664 $ 
Issuance of preferred stock  3,637  27,424 
      
Balance, end of period $74,301 $27,424 
      
Common stock and additional paid-in capital       
Balance, beginning of period $19,222 $18,062 
 Employee benefit plans  (3,892) (2,695)
 Issuance of Common stock    4,911 
 Issuance of shares for Nikko Cordial acquisition    (3,500)
 Issuance of TARP-related warrants  88   
 Reset of convertible preferred stock conversion price  1,285   
 Other  17  (127)
      
Balance, end of period $16,720 $16,651 
      
Retained earnings       
Balance, beginning of period $86,521 $121,769 
 Adjustment to opening balance, net of tax(1)  413   
      
 Adjusted balance, beginning of period $86,934 $121,769 
 Net income (loss)  5,872  (7,606)
 Common dividends(2)  (37) (3,429)
 Preferred dividends  (2,502) (444)
 Preferred stock Series H discount accretion  (108)  
 Reset of convertible preferred stock conversion price  (1,285)  
      
Balance, end of period $88,874 $110,290 
      
Treasury stock, at cost       
Balance, beginning of period $(9,582)$(21,724)
 Issuance of shares pursuant to employee benefit plans  3,617  3,941 
 Treasury stock acquired(3)  (2) (6)
 Issuance of shares for Nikko Cordial acquisition    7,858 
 Other  17  20 
      
Balance, end of period $(5,950)$(9,911)
      
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)       
Balance, beginning of period $(25,195)$(4,660)
 Adjustment to opening balance, net of tax(1)  (413)  
      
 Adjusted balance, beginning of period $(25,608)$(4,660)
 Net change in unrealized gains and losses on investment securities, net of tax  3,005  (3,715)
 Net change in cash flow hedges, net of tax  1,524  (760)
 Net change in FX translation adjustment, net of tax  (568) 1,111 
 Pension liability adjustment, net of tax  4  (25)
      
Net change in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) $3,965 $(3,389)
      
Balance, end of period $(21,643)$(8,049)
      
Total Citigroup common stockholders' equity (shares outstanding: 5,507,717 at June 30, 2009 and 5,450,068 at December 31, 2008) $78,001 $108,981 
      
Total Citigroup stockholders' equity $152,302 $136,405 
      
Noncontrolling interests       
Balance, beginning of period $2,392 $5,308 
 Initial origination of a noncontrolling interests    1,409 
 Transactions between noncontrolling interest shareholders and the related consolidating subsidiary  (134) (2,237)
 Transactions between Citigroup and the noncontrolling interest shareholders  (359) (261)
 Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest shareholders  (50) 56 
 Dividends paid to noncontrolling interest shareholders  (16) (61)
 Accumulated other comprehensive income—Net change in unrealized gains and losses on investments securities, net of tax  1  (12)
 Accumulated other comprehensive income—Net change in FX translation adjustment, net of tax  (31) 126 
 All other  63  187 
      
Net change in noncontrolling interests $(526)$(793)
      
Balance, end of period $1,866 $4,515 
      
Total equity $154,168 $140,920 
      

 
 Nine Months Ended September 30, 
In millions of dollars, except shares in thousands 2009 2008 

Preferred stock at aggregate liquidation value

       
 

Balance, beginning of period

 $70,664 $ 
 

Issuance of preferred stock

  3,653  27,424 
 

Conversion of preferred stock

  (74,005)  
      

Balance, end of period

 $312 $27,424 
      

Common stock and additional paid-in capital

       
 

Balance, beginning of period

 $19,222 $18,062 
 

Employee benefit plans

  (3,508) (2,405)
 

Issuance of Common stock

  173  4,911 
 

Issuance of shares for Nikko Cordial acquisition

    (3,500)
 

Issuance of TARP-related warrants

  88   
 

Reset of convertible preferred stock conversion price

  1,285   
 

Conversion of preferred stock to common stock

  61,790   
 

Other

  (18) (127)
      

Balance, end of period

 $79,032 $16,941 
     ��

Retained earnings

       

Balance, beginning of period

 $86,521 $121,769 
 

Adjustment to opening balance, net of tax(1)

  413   
      
 

Adjusted balance, beginning of period

 $86,934 $121,769 
 

Net income (loss)

  5,973  (10,421)
 

Common dividends(2)

  (34) (5,175)
 

Preferred dividends

  (3,201) (833)
 

Preferred stock Series H discount accretion

  (124)  
 

Reset of convertible preferred stock conversion price

  (1,285)  
 

Conversion of Preferred stock

  (3,055)  
      

Balance, end of period

 $85,208 $105,340 
      

Treasury stock, at cost

       

Balance, beginning of period

 $(9,582)$(21,724)
 

Issuance of shares pursuant to employee benefit plans

  3,505  4,210 
 

Treasury stock acquired(3)

  (3) (7)
 

Issuance of shares for Nikko Cordial acquisition

    7,858 
 

Other

  21  21 
      

Balance, end of period

 $(6,059)$(9,642)
      

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

       

Balance, beginning of period

 $(25,195)$(4,660)
 

Adjustment to opening balance, net of tax(1)

  (413)  
      
 

Adjusted balance, beginning of period

 $(25,608)$(4,660)
 

Net change in unrealized gains and losses on investment securities, net of tax

  5,818  (6,657)
 

Net change in cash flow hedges, net of tax

  1,012  (312)
 

Net change in FX translation adjustment, net of tax

  1,131  (2,419)
 

Pension liability adjustment, net of tax

  (4) 47 
      
 

Net change in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

 $7,957 $(9,341)
      

Balance, end of period

 $(17,651)$(14,001)
      

Total Citigroup common stockholders' equity (shares outstanding: 22,863,947 at September 30, 2009 and 5,450,068 at December 31, 2008)

 $140,530 $98,638 
      

Total Citigroup stockholders' equity

 $140,842 $126,062 
      

Noncontrolling interests

       

Balance, beginning of period

 $2,392 $5,308 
 

Initial origination of a noncontrolling interest

  124  1,409 
 

Transactions between noncontrolling interest shareholders and the related consolidating subsidiary

  (134) (2,347)
 

Transactions between Citigroup and the noncontrolling interest shareholders

  (350) (836)
 

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest shareholders

  24  (37)
 

Dividends paid to noncontrolling interest shareholders

  (16) (136)
 

Accumulated other comprehensive income—Net change in unrealized gains and losses on investments securities, net of tax

  7  3 
 

Accumulated other comprehensive income—Net change in FX translation adjustment, net of tax

  31  6 
 

All other

  29  92 
      

Net change in noncontrolling interests

 $(285)$(1,846)
      

Balance, end of period

 $2,107 $3,462 
      

Total equity

 $142,949 $129,524 
      

Table of Contents


Comprehensive income (loss)       
 Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests $5,822 $(7,550)
 Net change in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)  3,935  (3,275)
      
Total comprehensive income (loss) $9,757 $(10,825)
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to the noncontrolling interest  (80) 170 
      
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Citigroup $9,837 $(10,995)
      

Comprehensive income (loss)

       
 

Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests

 $5,997 $(10,458)
 

Net change in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

  7,995  (9,332)
      

Total comprehensive income (loss)

 $13,992 $(19,790)

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to the noncontrolling interest

  62  (28)
      

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Citigroup

 $13,930 $(19,762)
      

(1)
The adjustment to the opening balances for Retained earnings and Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) represents the cumulative effect of initially adopting FSPASC 320-10-65-1 (FSP FAS 115-2 (ASC 320-10-65-1)115-2). See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further disclosure.

(2)
Common dividends declared were $0.01 per share in the first quarter of 2009 and $0.32 per share in the first, second and secondthird quarters of 2008.

(3)
All open market repurchases were transacted under an existing authorized share repurchase plan.plan and relate to customer fails/errors.

See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


Table of Contents

CITIGROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)

 
 Six Months Ended June 30, 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008(1) 
Cash flows from operating activities of continuing operations       
Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests $5,822 $(7,550)
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests  (50) 56 
      
Citigroup's net income (loss) $5,872 $(7,606)
 Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes  (261) 278 
 Gain (loss) on sale, net of taxes  2  (313)
      
 Income (loss) from continuing operations—excluding noncontrolling interests $6,131 $(7,571)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations       
 Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits  196  167 
 Additions to deferred policy acquisition costs  (221) (222)
 Depreciation and amortization  859  1,410 
 Provision for credit losses  22,343  12,628 
 Change in trading account assets  48,322  33,545 
 Change in trading account liabilities  (47,786) 7,386 
 Change in federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell  1,324  53,897 
 Change in federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase  (31,804) (58,136)
 Change in brokerage receivables net of brokerage payables  (7,763) 6,348 
 Net losses (gains) from sales of investments  (1,231) 258 
 Change in loans held-for-sale  (820) 16,340 
 Other, net  (10,287) (12,902)
      
Total adjustments $(26,868)$60,719 
      
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations $(20,737)$53,148 
      
Cash flows from investing activities of continuing operations       
 Change in deposits at interest with banks $(12,689)$1,421 
 Change in loans  (86,734) (134,903)
 Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans  127,034  142,939 
 Purchases of investments  (120,361) (213,470)
 Proceeds from sales of investments  47,441  59,265 
 Proceeds from maturities of investments  57,536  131,466 
 Capital expenditures on premises and equipment  (615) (1,509)
 Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment, subsidiaries and affiliates, and repossessed assets  4,845  2,216 
      
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing operations $16,457 $(12,575)
      
Cash flows from financing activities of continuing operations       
 Dividends paid $(2,539)$(3,873)
 Issuance of common stock    4,961 
 Issuance (redemptions) of preferred stock    27,424 
 Treasury stock acquired  (2) (6)
 Stock tendered for payment of withholding taxes  (108) (325)
 Issuance of long-term debt  60,205  49,878 
 Payments and redemptions of long-term debt  (66,652) (57,780)
 Change in deposits  30,552  (22,588)
 Change in short-term borrowings  (20,497) (32,043)
      
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities of continuing operations $959 $(34,352)
      
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents $171 $212 
      
Net cash from discontinued operations $812 $185 
      
Change in cash and due from banks $(2,338)$6,618 
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period $29,253 $38,206 
      
Cash and due from banks at end of period $26,915 $44,824 
      
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information for continuing operations       
 Cash (received) paid during the period for income taxes $(585)$915 
 Cash paid during the period for interest $15,084 $30,856 
      
Non-cash investing activities       
 Transfers to repossessed assets $1,363 $1,505 
      

(1)
Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation

See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


Table of Contents

CITIGROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)

 
 Nine Months Ended September 30, 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

Cash flows from operating activities of continuing operations

       

Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests

 $5,997 $(10,458)

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  24  (37)
      

Citigroup's net income (loss)

 $5,973 $(10,421)
 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

  (679) 882 
 

Gain (loss) on sale, net of taxes

  2  (304)
      
 

Income (loss) from continuing operations—excluding noncontrolling interests

 $6,650 $(10,999)

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations

       
 

Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits

  298  252 
 

Additions to deferred policy acquisition costs

  (354) (311)
 

Depreciation and amortization

  1,290  1,953 
 

Provision for credit losses

  31,114  21,210 
 

Change in trading account assets

  28,355  81,930 
 

Change in trading account liabilities

  (32,437) (12,799)
 

Change in federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

  (19,061) 48,657 
 

Change in federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

  (24,008) (53,824)
 

Change in brokerage receivables net of brokerage payables

  (2,360) 9,412 
 

Net losses (gains) from sales of investments

  (1,719) 863 
 

Change in loans held-for-sale

  (1,605) 22,398 
 

Other, net

  3  (9,796)
      

Total adjustments

 $(20,484)$109,945 
      

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations

 $(13,834)$98,946 
      

Cash flows from investing activities of continuing operations

       

Change in deposits at interest with banks

 $(47,797)$(9,326)

Change in loans

  (127,661) (187,859)

Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans

  185,442  203,863 

Purchases of investments

  (167,115) (272,815)

Proceeds from sales of investments

  66,890  60,255 

Proceeds from maturities of investments

  90,218  194,312 

Capital expenditures on premises and equipment

  (859) (2,111)

Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment, subsidiaries and affiliates, and repossessed assets

  5,590  15,644 
      

Net cash provided by investing activities of continuing operations

 $4,708 $1,963 
      

Cash flows from financing activities of continuing operations

       

Dividends paid

 $(3,235)$(6,008)

Issuance of common stock

    4,961 

Issuance (redemptions) of preferred stock

    27,424 

Treasury stock acquired

  (3) (7)

Stock tendered for payment of withholding taxes

  (116) (377)

Issuance of long-term debt

  90,464  67,311 

Payments and redemptions of long-term debt

  (83,850) (94,073)

Change in deposits

  58,418  (32,411)

Change in short-term borrowings

  (56,143) (41,633)
      

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities of continuing operations

 $5,535 $(74,813)
      

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 $582 $(1,105)
      

Net cash from discontinued operations

 $238 $(171)
      

Change in cash and due from banks

 $(2,771)$24,820 

Cash and due from banks at beginning of period

 $29,253 $38,206 
      

Cash and due from banks at end of period

 $26,482 $63,026 
      

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information for continuing operations

       

Cash (received)paid during the period for income taxes

 $(1,251)$2,123 

Cash paid during the period for interest

 $21,338 $44,294 
      

Non-cash investing activities

       

Transfers to repossessed assets

 $2,149 $2,574 
      

See Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.


Table of Contents

CITIBANK, N.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

In millions of dollars, except shares June 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 
 
 (Unaudited)
  
 
Assets       
Cash and due from banks $20,387 $22,107 
Deposits with banks  171,639  156,774 
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell  18,297  41,613 
Trading account assets (including $1,100 and $12,092 pledged to creditors at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively)  153,031  197,052 
Investments (including $1,707 and $3,028 pledged to creditors at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively)  190,070  165,914 
Loans, net of unearned income  525,265  555,198 
Allowance for loan losses  (22,881) (18,273)
      
Total loans, net $502,384 $536,925 
Goodwill  9,908  10,148 
Intangible assets  8,582  7,689 
Premises and equipment, net  5,005  5,331 
Interest and fees receivable  6,764  7,171 
Other assets  79,333  76,316 
      
Total assets $1,165,400 $1,227,040 
      
Liabilities       
Non-interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices $86,285 $59,808 
Interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices  176,284  180,737 
Non-interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S.   36,655  33,769 
Interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S.   456,793  480,984 
      
Total deposits $756,017 $755,298 
Trading account liabilities  57,215  110,599 
Purchased funds and other borrowings  107,693  116,333 
Accrued taxes and other expenses  8,070  8,192 
Long-term debt and subordinated notes  85,904  113,381 
Other liabilities  39,774  40,797 
      
Total liabilities $1,054,673 $1,144,600 
      
Citibank stockholder's equity       
Capital stock ($20 par value) outstanding shares: 37,534,553 in each period $751 $751 
Surplus  102,263  74,767 
Retained earnings  20,780  21,735 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(1)  (13,964) (15,895)
      
Total Citibank stockholder's equity $109,830 $81,358 
Noncontrolling interest  897  1,082 
      
Total equity $110,727 $82,440 
      
Total liabilities and equity $1,165,400 $1,227,040 
      

 
 Citibank, N.A. and Subsidiaries
 
In millions of dollars, except shares September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 
 
 (Unaudited)
  
 

Assets

       

Cash and due from banks

 $21,016 $22,107 

Deposits with banks

  207,082  156,774 

Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell

  16,396  41,613 

Trading account assets (including $9,539 and $12,092 pledged to creditors at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively)

  163,542  197,052 

Investments (including $2,633 and $3,028 pledged to creditors at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively)

  187,406  165,914 

Loans, net of unearned income

  507,629  555,198 

Allowance for loan losses

  (23,299) (18,273)
      

Total loans, net

 $484,330 $536,925 

Goodwill

  10,210  10,148 

Intangible assets

  8,010  7,689 

Premises and equipment, net

  4,954  5,331 

Interest and fees receivable

  6,740  7,171 

Other assets

  77,068  76,316 
      

Total assets

 $1,186,754 $1,227,040 
      

Liabilities

       

Non-interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices

 $80,425 $55,223 

Interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices

  188,803  185,322 

Non-interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S. 

  39,403  33,769 

Interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S. 

  477,170  480,984 
      

Total deposits

 $785,801 $755,298 

Trading account liabilities

  56,917  108,921 

Purchased funds and other borrowings

  88,889  116,333 

Accrued taxes and other expenses

  9,347  8,192 

Long-term debt and subordinated notes

  85,573  113,381 

Other liabilities

  44,508  42,475 
      

Total liabilities

 $1,071,035 $1,144,600 
      

Citibank stockholder's equity

       

Capital stock ($20 par value) outstanding shares: 37,534,553 in each period

 $751 $751 

Surplus

  105,293  74,767 

Retained earnings

  19,988  21,735 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(1)

  (11,415) (15,895)
      

Total Citibank stockholder's equity

 $114,617 $81,358 

Noncontrolling interest

  1,102  1,082 
      

Total equity

 $115,719 $82,440 
      

Total liabilities and equity

 $1,186,754 $1,227,040 
      

(1)
Amounts at JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 include the after-tax amounts for net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities of ($6.680)4.653) billion and ($8.008) billion, respectively, for FX translation of ($4.128)3.114) billion and ($3.964) billion, respectively, for cash flow hedges of ($2.509)2.965) billion and ($3.247) billion, respectively, and for pension liability adjustments of ($647)683) million and ($676) million, respectively.

See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


Table of Contents

CITIGROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

1.     BASIS OF PRESENTATION

        The accompanying Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and for the three- and six-monthnine-month periods ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 include the accounts of Citigroup Inc. (Citigroup) and its subsidiaries (collectively, the Company). In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation, have been reflected. The accompanying Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included in Citigroup's 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

        Certain financial information that is normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, but is not required for interim reporting purposes, has been condensed or omitted.

        Management must make estimates and assumptions that affect the Consolidated Financial Statements and the related footnote disclosures. While management makes its best judgment, actual results could differ from those estimates. Current market conditions increase the risk and complexity of the judgments in these estimates.

        Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior-period's financial statements to conform to the current period's presentation.

        As noted above, the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are unaudited, including any reclassifications to December 31, 2008 balances related to the new Citicorp/Citi Holdings organizational structure.unaudited.

FASB Launches Accounting Standards Codification

        The FASB has issued FASB Statement No. 168,The "FASB Accounting Standards Codification™" and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (ASC 105). The Statement 168 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification™ (Codification or ASC) as the single source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The Codification supersedes all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other nongrandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification willhave become nonauthoritative.

        Following the Codification, the Board will not issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, it will issue Accounting Standards Updates (ASU), which will serve to update the Codification, provide background information about the guidance and provide the basis for conclusions on the changes to the Codification.

        GAAP is not intended to be changed as a result of the FASB's Codification project, but it willwhat does change is the way the guidance is organized and presented. As a result, these changes will have a significant impact on how companies reference GAAP in their financial statements and in their accounting policies for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. Citigroup has begun the process of implementing the Codification in this quarterly report byis providing references to the Codification topics alongside references to the existing standards.

Significant Accounting Policies

        The Company's accounting policies are fundamental to understanding management's discussion and analysis of results of operations and financial condition. The Company has identified six policies as being significant because they require management to make subjective and/or complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain. These policies relate to Valuations of Financial Instruments, Allowance for Credit Losses, Securitizations, Goodwill, Income Taxes and Legal Reserves. The Company, in consultation with the Audit and Risk Management Committee of the Board of Directors, has reviewed and approved these significant accounting policies, which are further described in the Company's 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ACCOUNTING CHANGES

Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments

        In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, "Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments," (ASC 825-10-65-1). This FSP requires disclosing qualitative and quantitative information about the fair value of all financial instruments on a quarterly basis, including methods and significant assumptions used to estimate fair value during the period. These disclosures were previously only done annually. The disclosures required by this FSP arewere effective for the quarter ended June 30, 2009. This FSP has no effect on how Citigroup accounts for these instruments.

Other-Than-Temporary Impairments on Investment Securities

        In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, "Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments" (FSP(ASC 320-10-65-1/FSP FAS 115-2/ASC 320-10-65-1)115-2), which amends the recognition guidance for other-than-temporary impairments (OTTI) of debt securities and expands the financial statement disclosures for OTTI on debt and equity securities. Citigroup adopted the FSP in the first quarter of 2009.

        As a result of the FSP, the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income reflects the full impairment (that is, the difference between the security's amortized cost basis and fair value) on debt securities that the Company intends to sell or would more-likely-than-not be required to sell before the expected recovery of the amortized cost basis. For available-for-sale (AFS) and held-to-maturity (HTM) debt securities that


Table of Contents

management has no intent to sell and believes that it more-likely-than-not will not be required to sell prior to recovery,


Table of Contents

only the credit loss component of the impairment is recognized in earnings, while the rest of the fair value loss is recognized inAccumulated Other Comprehensive Incomeother comprehensive income (AOCI). The credit loss component recognized in earnings is identified as the amount of principal cash flows not expected to be received over the remaining term of the security as projected using the Company's cash flow projections using its base assumptions. As a result of the adoption of the FSP, Citigroup's income in the first and second quartersquarter of 2009 was higher by $631 million and $1,634 million on a pretax basis $391 million and $1,013($391 million on an after-tax basis), respectively.

        The cumulative effect of the change included an increase in the opening balance ofRetained earnings at January 1, 2009 of $665 million on a pretax basis ($413 million after-tax).

        See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Investments, for disclosures related to the Company's investment securities and OTTI.

Measurement of Fair Value in Inactive Markets

        In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-4, "Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly" (ASC 820-10-65-4). The FSP reaffirms that fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. The FSP also reaffirms the need to use judgment in determining ifwhether a formerly active market has become inactive and in determining fair values when the market has become inactive. The adoption of the FSP had no effect on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value

        In August 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-05,Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure (Topic 820): Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value. This ASU provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using one or more of the following techniques:

    1.
    A valuation technique that uses quoted prices for similar liabilities (or an identical liability) when traded as assets.

    2.
    Another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of Topic 820.

        This ASU also clarifies that both a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability at the measurement date and the quoted price for the identical liability when traded as an asset in an active market when no adjustments to the quoted price of the asset are required, are Level 1 fair value measurements.

        This ASU is effective immediately and does not have a material impact to Citigroup.

Revisions to the Earnings per Share Calculation

        In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP EITF 03-6-1, "Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities" (ASC 260-10-45 to 65). Under the FSP, unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends are considered to be a separate class of common stock and included in the EPS calculation using the "two-class method." Citigroup's restricted and deferred share awards meet the definition of a participating security. In accordance with the FSP, restricted and deferred shares are now included in the basic EPS calculation.


Table of Contents

        The following table shows the effect of adopting the FSPchanged accounting for participating securities on Citigroup's basic and diluted EPS for 2008 and 2009:

 
 1Q08 2Q08 3Q08 4Q08 Full Year
2008
 1Q09 

Basic and Diluted Earnings per Share(1)

                   

As reported

 $(1.02)$(0.54)$(0.60)$(3.40)$(5.59) N/A 

Two-class method

 $(1.03)$(0.55)$(0.61)$(3.40)$(5.61)$(0.18)
              

N/A    Not Applicable

(1)
Diluted EPS is the same as Basic EPS for all periods presented due to the net loss available to common shareholders. Using actual diluted shares would result in anti-dilution.

Additional Disclosures for Derivative Instruments

        On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted SFAS No. 161,Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment to SFAS 133 (SFAS 161/ASC 815-10-65-1)(ASC 815-10-65-1 /SFAS 161). The standard requires enhanced disclosures about derivative instruments and hedged items that are accounted for under SFAS 133 (ASC 815-10)ASC 815-10 (SFAS 133) and related interpretations. No comparative information for periods prior to the effective date is required. See Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Derivatives Activities, for disclosures related to the Company's hedging activities and derivative instruments. SFAS 161 (ASC 815-10-65-1)ASC 815-10-65-1 (SFAS 161) had no impact on how Citigroup accounts for these instruments.

Business Combinations

        In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141(revised),Business Combinations (SFAS(ASC 805-10/SFAS 141(R)/ASC 805-10)), which is designed to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial reports about a business combination and its effects. The Statement replaces SFAS 141,Business Combinations. SFAS 141(R) (ASC 805-10) retains the fundamental requirements in SFAS 141 that the acquisition method of accounting (which Statement 141was called the purchase method) be used for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination. SFAS 141(R) (ASC 805-10)The Statement also retains the guidance in SFAS 141 for identifying and recognizing intangible assets separately from goodwill. The most significant changes in SFAS 141(R) (ASC 805-10) are: (1) acquisition costs and restructuring costs will now be expensed; (2) stock consideration will be measured based on the quoted market price as of the acquisition date instead of the date the deal is announced; and (3) the acquirer will record a 100% step-up to fair value for all assets and liabilities, including the noncontrolling interest portion, and goodwill is recorded as if a 100% interest was acquired.

        Citigroup adopted SFASASC 805-10 (SFAS 141(R) (ASC 805-10)) on January 1, 2009, and the standard is applied prospectively.

Noncontrolling Interests in Subsidiaries

        In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 160,Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements (SFAS 160/ASC 810-10-65-1)(ASC 810-10-65-1/SFAS 160), which establishes standards for the accounting and reporting of noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries (previously called minority interests) in consolidated financial statements and for the loss of control of subsidiaries. Upon adoption, SFAS 160 (ASC 810-10-65-1)ASC 810-10-65-1 (SFAS 160) requires that the equity interest of noncontrolling shareholders, partners, or other equity holders in subsidiaries be presented as a separate item in Citigroup's stockholders' equity, rather than as a liability. After the initial adoption, when a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained noncontrolling equity investment in the former subsidiary must be measured at fair value at the date of deconsolidation.

        The gain or loss on the deconsolidation of the subsidiary is measured using the fair value of the remaining investment, rather than the previous carrying amount of that retained investment.

        Citigroup adopted SFAS 160 (ASC 810-10-65-1)ASC 810-10-65-1 (SFAS 160) on January 1, 2009. As a result, $2.392 billion of noncontrolling interests was reclassified fromOther liabilities to Citigroup's Stockholders' equity.

Sale with Repurchase Financing Agreements

        In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 140-3, "Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets and Repurchase Financing Transactions" (ASC 860-10-40). This FSP provides implementation guidance on whether a security transfer with a contemporaneous repurchase financing involving the transferred financial asset must be evaluated as one linked transaction or two separate de-linked transactions.

        The FSP requires the recognition of the transfer and the repurchase agreement as one linked transaction, unless all of the following criteria are met: (1) the initial transfer and the repurchase financing are not contractually contingent on one another; (2) the initial transferor has full recourse upon default, and the repurchase agreement's price is fixed and not at fair value; (3) the financial asset is readily obtainable in the marketplace and the transfer and repurchase financing are executed at market rates; and (4) the maturity of the repurchase financing is before the maturity of the financial asset. The scope of this FSP is limited to transfers and subsequent repurchase financings that are entered into contemporaneously or in contemplation of one another.

        Citigroup adopted the FSP on January 1, 2009. The impact of adopting this FSP was not material.


Table of Contents

        The following accounting pronouncements became effective for Citigroup on January 1, 2009. The impact of adopting these pronouncements did not have a material impact on Citigroup's Consolidated Financial Statements.

Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity's Own Stock

        EITF Issue 07-5, "Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity's Own Stock" (ASC 815-40).

Transition Guidance for Conforming Changes to Issue No. 98-5

        EITF Issue 08-4, "Transition Guidance for Conforming Changes to Issue No. 98-5" (ASC 470-20-65-2).

Equity Method Investment Accounting Considerations

        EITF Issue 08-6, "Equity Method Investment Accounting Considerations" (ASC 323-10).

Accounting for Defensive Intangible Assets

        EITF Issue 08-7, "Accounting for Defensive Intangible Assets" (ASC 350-30).

Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets

        FSP FAS 142-3 "Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets" (ASC 350-30).

FUTURE APPLICATION OF ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

Fair Value Disclosures about Pension Plan Assets

        In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 132(R)-1, "Employers' Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets" (ASC 715-20-65-2). This FSP requires that information about plan assets be disclosed on an annual basis, based on the fair value disclosure requirements of SFAS 157 (ASC 820-10).basis. Citigroup will be required to separate plan assets into the three fair value hierarchy levels and provide a rollforward of the changes in fair value of plan assets classified as Level 3 in Citigroup's annual Consolidated Financial Statements.

        The disclosures about plan assets required by this FSP are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. This FSP will have no effect on the Company's accounting for plan benefits and obligations.

Investments in Certain Entities that Calculate Net Asset Value per Share

        On September 30, 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2009-12,Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or its Equivalent), to provide guidance on measuring the fair value of certain alternative investments. The ASU permits entities to use net asset value as a practical expedient to measure the fair value of its investments in certain investment funds. The ASU also requires additional disclosures regarding the nature and risks of such investments. The ASU provides guidance on the classification of such investments as Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair-value hierarchy. The ASU is effective for reporting periods ending after December 15, 2009. This ASU is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's accounting for its investments in alternative investment funds.

Proposed Additional Disclosures Regarding Fair Value Measurements

        On August 28, 2009, the FASB issued an exposure draft of a proposed ASU,Improving Disclosures About Fair Value Measurements, which proposes new disclosures about fair value measurements. Certain of the proposed amendments would be effective for reporting periods ending after December 15, 2009. Additional disclosures have been proposed that would require a sensitivity analysis regarding the impact of unobservable inputs on the fair valuation of Level 3 instruments, which would be effective for reporting periods ending after March 15, 2010.

Loss-Contingency Disclosures

        In June 2008, the FASB issued an exposure draft proposing expanded disclosures regarding loss contingencies accounted for under FASB Statement No. 5,Accounting for Contingencies (ASC 450-10 to 20,20), and SFASASC 805-10 (SFAS 141(R) (ASC 805-10)). This proposal increases the number of loss contingencies subject to disclosure and requires substantial quantitative and qualitative information to be provided about those loss contingencies. The proposed effective date isfor fiscal years ending after December 31,15, 2009, but will have no effect on the Company's accounting for loss contingencies.

Elimination of QSPEs and Changes in the Consolidation Model for Variable Interest Entities

        In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166,Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (SFAS 166), that will eliminate Qualifying Special Purpose Entities (QSPEs) from the guidance in SFAS 140,Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities (ASC 860). This change will have a significant impact on Citigroup's Consolidated Financial Statements as the Company will lose sales treatment for certain assets previously sold to QSPEs, as well as for certain future sales, and for certain transfers of portions of assets that do not meet the definition of participating interests. SFAS 166 is effective for fiscal years that begin after November 15, 2009.

        Simultaneously, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167,Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (SFAS 167), which details three key changes to the consolidation model in FASB Interpretation No. 46 (Revised December 2003), "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities" (FIN 46(R)/ASC 810-10).model. First, former QSPEs will now be included in the scope of SFAS 167. In addition, the FASB has changed the method of analyzing which party to a variable interest entity (VIE) should consolidate the VIE (known as the primary beneficiary) to a qualitative determination of which party to the VIE has power combined with potentially significant benefits and losses, instead of the current quantitative risks and rewards model. The entity that has power has the ability to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance. Finally, the new standard


Table of Contents

requires that the primary beneficiary analysis be re-evaluated whenever circumstances change. The current rules require reconsideration of the primary beneficiary only when specified reconsideration events occur.

        As a result of implementing these new accounting standards, Citigroup expects to be required to consolidate certain of the VIEs and former QSPEs with which it currently has involvement. An ongoing evaluation of the application of these new requirements could, with the resolution of certain uncertainties, result in the identification of additional VIEs and QSPEs, other than those presented below, needing to be consolidated. It is not currently anticipated, however, that any such newly identified VIEs and QSPEs would have a significant impact on Citigroup's Consolidated Financial Statements or capital position.

        In accordance with SFAS 167, Citigroup is currently evaluating two approaches for consolidating all of the VIEs and QSPEs that it expects to consolidate. The first approach would require initially measuring the assets, liabilities, and noncontrolling interests of the VIEs and QSPEs at their carrying values (the amounts at which the assets, liabilities, and noncontrolling interests would have been carried in the Consolidated Financial Statements, if Citigroup were to be designated as the primary beneficiary). The second approach under consideration would be to elect the fair value option, in which all of the financial assets and liabilities of certain designated VIEs and QSPEs would be recorded at fair value upon adoption of SFAS 167 and continue to be marked to market thereafter, with changes in fair value reported in earnings.

        While this review has not yet been completed, Citigroup's tentative approach would be to consolidate all of the VIEs and QSPEs that it expects to consolidate at carrying value, except for Local Consumer Lendingcertain private label residential mortgages, for which the


Table of Contents

fair value option would be elected. The following tables present the pro forma impact of adopting these new accounting standards applying this tentative approach. The actual impact of adopting these new accounting requirements could, however, be significantly different should Citigroup change from this methodology. For instance, if Citigroup were to consolidate its off-balance sheet credit card securitization vehicles applying the fair value option, an associated allowance for loan losses would not be established upon adoption of SFAS 167, with an offsetting charge toRetained earnings. Rather, the charge toRetained earnings would be affected by the difference between the fair value of the assets and liabilities that Citigroup would consolidate, which would result in a lesser charge toRetained earnings than under the carrying value approach.

        The pro forma impact of these impending changes on incremental GAAP assets and resulting risk-weighted assets for those VIEs and former QSPEs that are currently expected to be consolidated or deconsolidated for accounting purposes as of January 1, 2010 (based on financial information as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009), reflecting Citigroup's present understanding of the new requirements, and assuming continued application of existing risk-based capital rules, would be as follows:

 
 Incremental 
In billions of dollars GAAP
assets
 Risk-
weighted
assets(1)
 

Credit cards

 $85.5 $0.5 

Commercial paper conduits

  44.5   

Student loans

  14.2  4.1 

Private label consumer mortgages

  9.2  5.3 

Investment funds

  3.3  0.5 

Commercial mortgages

  1.3  1.3 

Muni bonds

  0.7  0.1 

Mutual fund deferred sales commissions

  0.6  0.4 
      

Total

 $159.3 $12.2 
      

 
 Incremental 
In billions of dollars GAAP
assets
 Risk-
weighted
assets(1)
 

Impact of Consolidation:

       

Credit cards

 $84.2 $0.9 

Commercial paper conduits

  39.7   

Student loans

  13.9  4.0 

Private label consumer mortgages

  7.7  4.6 

Investment funds

  3.8  0.4 

Commercial mortgages

  1.4  1.3 

Muni bonds

  0.6  0.1 

Mutual fund deferred sales commissions

  0.6  0.6 
      
 

Subtotal

 $151.9 $11.9 
      

Impact of Deconsolidation:

       

Collateralized debt obligations(2)

 $1.9 $5.9 
      

Total

 $153.8 $17.8 
      

(1)
Citigroup undertook certain actions during the first and second quarters of 2009 in support of its off-balance sheet credit card securitization vehicles. As a result of these actions, Citigroup included approximately $82 billion of incremental risk-weighted assets in its risk-based capital ratios as of March 31, 2009 and an additional approximately $900 million as of June 30, 2009. See Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(2)
The implementation of SFAS 167 will result in the deconsolidation of certain synthetic and cash collateralized debt obligation (CDO) VIEs that were previously consolidated under the requirements of ASC 810 (FIN 46(R)). Upon deconsolidation of these synthetic CDOs, Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet will reflect the recognition of current receivables and payables related to purchased and written credit default swaps entered into with these VIEs, which had previously been eliminated in consolidation. The deconsolidation of certain cash CDOs will have a minimal impact on GAAP assets, but will cause a sizable increase in risk-weighted assets. The impact on risk-weighted assets results from replacing, in Citigroup's trading account, largely investment grade securities owned by these VIEs when consolidated, with Citigroup's holdings of non-investment grade or unrated securities issued by these VIEs when deconsolidated.

        In September 2009, the U.S. banking and thrift regulatory agencies issued a notice of proposed rulemaking in which the agencies proposed, in part, to eliminate the existing provision in the risk-based capital rules that permits a banking organization, if it is required to consolidate for accounting purposes a qualifying ABCP program that it sponsors, to exclude the consolidated assets from its risk-weighted assets.

        If this exclusion under the existing risk-based capital rules for qualifying ABCP programs, such as commercial paper conduits, were to be eliminated, as proposed, Citigroup's total incremental risk-weighted assets (based on financial information as of September 30, 2009) would be greater by approximately an additional $15.9 billion.

        The above table reflects: (i) the estimated portion of the assets of former QSPEs to which Citigroup, acting as principal, has transferred assets and received sales treatment as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 (totaling approximately $747.0$733.5 billion), and (ii) the estimated assets of significant unconsolidated VIEs as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 with which Citigroup is involved (totaling approximately $238.4$231.4 billion) that would be required to be consolidated under the new accounting standards. Due to the variety of transaction structures and the level of Citigroup involvement in individual former QSPEs and VIEs, only a portion of the former QSPEs and VIEs with which the Company is involved is expected to be consolidated.

        In addition, the cumulative effect of adopting these new accounting standards as of January 1, 2010, based on financial information as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009, would result in an estimated aggregate after-tax charge toRetained earnings of approximately $8.3$7.8 billion, reflecting the net effect of an overall pretax charge toRetained earnings (primarily relating to the establishment of loan loss reserves and the reversal of residual interests held) of approximately $13.3$12.5 billion and the recognition of related deferred tax assets amounting to approximately $5.0$4.7 billion.


Table of Contents

        The pro forma impact on certain of Citigroup's regulatory capital ratios of adopting these new accounting standards (based on financial information as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009), and assuming the continued application of the existing risk-based capital rules, would be as follows:

 
 As of June 30, 2009 
 
 As Reported Pro Forma Impact 

Tier 1 Capital

  12.74% 11.40% (134) bps 

Total Capital

  16.62% 15.30% (132) bps 

 
 As of September 30, 2009 
 
 As Reported Pro Forma Impact 

Tier 1 Capital

  12.76% 11.44% (132) bps 

Total Capital

  16.58% 15.26% (132) bps 

        Elimination of the exclusion noted above under the existing risk-based capital rules for qualifying ABCP programs, such as commercial paper conduits, would further adversely affect certain of Citigroup's regulatory capital ratios. The pro forma impact on Citigroup's Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital ratios (based on financial information as of September 30, 2009), including the additional approximately $15.9 billion of risk-weighted assets arising from the consolidation of the commercial paper conduits, would be a total reduction in these ratios from those reported at September 30, 2009 of approximately 151 bps and 154 bps, respectively.

        The actual impact of adopting the new accounting standards on January 1, 2010 could differ, as financial information changes from the JuneSeptember 30, 2009 estimates


Table of Contents

and as several uncertainties in the application of these new standards are resolved.

Investment Company Audit Guide (SOP 07-1)

        In July 2007, the AICPA issued Statement of Position 07-1, "Clarification of the Scope of the Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment Companies and Accounting by Parent Companies and Equity Method Investors for Investments in Investment Companies" (SOP 07-1/ASC 946-10)(ASC 946-10/SOP 07-1), which was expected to be effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2007. However, in February 2008, the FASB delayed the effective date indefinitely by issuing an FSP SOP 07-1-1, "Effective Date of AICPA Statement of Position 07-1." This statement sets forth more stringent criteria for qualifying as an investment company than does the predecessor Audit Guide. In addition, SOP 07-1(ASC 946-10)946-10 (SOP 07-1) establishes new criteria for a parent company or equity method investor to retain investment company accounting in their consolidated financial statements. Investment companies record all their investments at fair value with changes in value reflected in earnings. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of adopting SOP 07-1(ASC 946-10).the SOP.


Table of Contents

2.     DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

Sale of Nikko Cordial

        On MayOctober 1, 2009, Citigroup entered into a definitive agreement to sell its Japanese domestic securities business, conducted principally throughthe Company announced the successful completion of the sale of Nikko Cordial Securities Inc., to Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation in aCorporation. The transaction withhas a total cash value to Citi of approximately $7.9¥776 billion (¥774.5 billion)(US$8.7 billion at an exchange rate of ¥89.60 to US$1.00 as of September 30, 2009). Citi's ownership interestsThe cash value is composed of the purchase price for the transferred business of ¥545 billion, the purchase price for certain Japanese-listed equity securities held by Nikko Cordial Securities of ¥30 billion, and ¥201 billion of excess cash derived through the repayment of outstanding indebtedness to Citi. After considering the impact of foreign exchange hedges of the proceeds of the transaction (most of which has been recorded in Nikko Citigroup Limited, Nikko Asset Management Co.the second and third quarters of 2009), Ltd., and Nikko Principal Investments Japan Ltd. were notthe sale will result in an immaterial after-tax gain to Citigroup. A total of about 7,800 employees are included in the transaction. The transaction is expected to close by the end of the fourth quarter of 2009, subject to regulatory approvals and customary closing conditions.

        The Nikko Cordial operations had total assets and total liabilities as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 of $19.4$23.6 billion and $12.4$16.0 billion, respectively.

        Results for all of the Nikko Cordial businesses sold are reported asDiscontinued operations for all periods presented. The assets and liabilities of the businesses being sold are included inAssets of discontinued operations held for sale andLiabilities of discontinued operations held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

        The following is a summary as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 of the assets and liabilities ofDiscontinued operations held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheet for the operations related to the Nikko Cordial businesses to be sold:

In millions of dollars June 30,
2009
 

Assets

    

Cash due from banks

 $800 

Deposits at interest with banks

  443 

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

  3,306 

Brokerage receivables

  1,711 

Trading account assets

  6,185 

Investments

  486 

Goodwill

  533 

Intangibles

  3,085 

Other assets

  2,863 
    

Total assets

 $19,412 
    

Liabilities

    

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase sold under agreements to repurchase

 $1,473 
 

Brokerage payables

  2,488 
 

Trading account liabilities

  2,289 
 

Short term borrowings

  4,300 

Other Liabilities

  1,824 
    

Total liabilities

 $12,374 
    

In millions of dollars September 30,
2009
 

Assets

    

Cash due from banks

 $224 

Deposits at interest with banks

  398 

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

  5,837 

Brokerage receivables

  1,293 

Trading account assets

  8,583 

Investments

  490 

Goodwill

  567 

Intangibles

  3,289 

Other assets

  2,923 
    

Total assets

 $23,604 
    

Liabilities

    

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase sold under agreements to repurchase

 $3,126 

Brokerage payables

  2,566 

Trading account liabilities

  2,823 

Short term borrowings

  5,817 

Other liabilities

  1,672 
    

Total liabilities

 $16,004 
    

        Summarized financial information for discontinued operations, including cash flows, related to the sale of Nikko Cordial follows:

 
 Three Months
Ended June 30,
 Six Months
Ended June 30,
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Total revenues, net of interest expense

 $112 $539 $380 $823 
          

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

 $(248)$105 $(382)$(5)

Provision (benefit) for income taxes and noncontrolling interest, net of taxes

  (83) 43  (133) (10)
          

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

 $(165)$62 $(249)$5 
          


 
 Six Months
Ended June 30,
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

Cash flows from operating activities

 $4,129 $(1,535)

Cash flows from investing activities

  (5,472) (3,229)

Cash flows from financing activities

  2,126  5,134 
      

Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations

 $783 $370 
      
 
 Three Months
Ended Sept. 30,
 Nine Months
Ended Sept. 30,
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Total revenues, net of interest expense

 $173 $422 $553 $1,245 
          

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

 $(221)$6 $(603)$2 

Provision (benefit) for income taxes and noncontrolling interest, net of taxes(1)

  208  1  75  (9)
          

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

 $(429)$5 $(678)$11 
          

(1)
Includes a tax expense of $290 million in the third quarter of 2009 related to the fourth quarter 2009 sale of Nikko Cordial.

 
 Nine Months
Ended Sept. 30,
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

Cash flows from operating activities

 $(1,320)$(4,519)

Cash flows from investing activities

  (9,579) (1,381)

Cash flows from financing activities

  11,108  5,907 
      

Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations

 $209 $7 
      

Table of Contents

Sale of Citigroup's German Retail Banking Operations

        On December 5, 2008, Citigroup sold its German retail banking operations to Credit Mutuel for Euro 5.2 billion in cash plus the German retail bank's operating net earnings accrued in 2008 through the closing. The sale resulted in an after-tax gain of approximately $3.9 billion including the after-tax gain on the foreign currency hedge of $383 million recognized during the fourth quarter of 2008.

        The sale did not include the corporate and investment banking business or the Germany-based European data center. Results for all of the German retail banking businesses sold are reported asDiscontinued operations for all periods presented.

        Summarized financial information forDiscontinued operations, including cash flows, related to the sale of the German retail banking operations is as follows:

 
 Three Months
Ended June 30,
 Six Months
Ended June 30,
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Total revenues, net of interest expense

 $30 $575 $36 $1,154 
          

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

 $(20)$189 $(39)$348 

Gain (loss) on sale(1)

      (41)  

Provision (benefit) for income taxes and noncontrolling interest, net of taxes

  (41) 67  (48) 123 
          

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

 $21 $122 $(32)$225 
          

 
 Three Months
Ended Sept. 30,
 Nine Months
Ended Sept. 30,
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Total revenues, net of interest expense

 $25 $847 $61 $2,001 
          

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

 $18 $503 $(21)$851 

Gain (loss) on sale(1)

      (41)  

Provision (benefit) for income taxes and noncontrolling interest, net of taxes

  6  (101) (42) 22 
          

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

 $12 $604 $(20)$829 
          

(1)
First half of 2009 YTD activity represents transactions related to a transitional service agreement between Citigroup and Credit Mutuel as well as adjustments against the gain on sale for the final settlement which occurred in April 2009.
 
 Six Months
Ended June 30,
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

Cash flows from operating activities

 $8 $(2,116)

Cash flows from investing activities

    432 

Cash flows from financing activities

  (8) 1,498 
      

Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations

 $ $(186)
      

 
 Nine Months
Ended Sept. 30,
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

Cash flows from operating activities

 $6 $(1,252)

Cash flows from investing activities

  1  1,833 

Cash flows from financing activities

  (7) (760)
      

Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations

 $ $(179)
      

CitiCapital

        On July 31, 2008, Citigroup sold substantially all of CitiCapital, the equipment finance unit inNorth America. The total proceeds from the transaction were approximately $12.5 billion and resulted in an after-tax loss to Citigroup of $305 million. This loss is included inIncome from discontinued operations on the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income for the second quarter of 2008.

        Results for all of the CitiCapital businesses sold are reported asDiscontinued operations for all periods presented.

        Summarized financial information forDiscontinued operations, including cash flows, related to the sale of CitiCapital is as follows:

 
 Three Months
Ended June 30,
 Six Months
Ended June 30,
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Total revenues, net of interest expense

 $21 $(281)$30 $(82)
          

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

 $(11)$43 $(10)$47 

Gain (loss) on sale(1)

  14  (517) 14  (517)

Provision (benefit) for income taxes and noncontrollinginterest, net of taxes

  1  (196) 1  (204)
          

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

 $2 $(278)$3 $(266)
          

 
 Three Months
Ended Sept. 30,
 Nine Months
Ended Sept. 30,
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Total revenues, net of interest expense

 $7 $96 $37 $14 
          

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

 $(1)$(2)$(11)$45 

Gain (loss) on sale(1)

    9  14  (508)

Provision (benefit) for income taxes and noncontrolling interest, net of taxes

    3  1  (201)
          

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

 $(1)$4 $2 $(262)
          

(1)
The $3 million in income from discontinued operations for the first half of 2009 relates to a transitional service agreement.
 
 Six Months
Ended June 30,
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

Cash flows from operating activities

 $ $(287)

Cash flows from investing activities

    349 

Cash flows from financing activities

    (61)
      

Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations

 $ $1 
      

 
 Nine Months
Ended Sept. 30,
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

Cash flows from operating activities

 $ $(287)

Cash flows from investing activities

    349 

Cash flows from financing activities

    (61)
      

Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations

 $ $1 
      

Table of Contents

Combined Results for Discontinued Operations

        The following is summarized financial information for the Nikko Cordial business, German retail banking operations and CitiCapital business. Additionally, contingency consideration payments received during the first quarter of 2009 of $29 million pretax ($19 million after-tax) related to the sale of Citigroup's Asset Management business, which was sold in December 2005, is also included in these balances.

 
 Three Months
Ended June 30,
 Six Months
Ended June 30,
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Total revenues, net of interest expense

 $163 $833 $446 $1,895 
          

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

 $(279)$337 $(431)$391 

Gain (loss) on sale

  14  (517) 2  (517)

Provision (benefit) for income taxes and noncontrolling interest, net of taxes

  (123) (86) (170) (91)
          

Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes

 $(142)$(94)$(259)$(35)
          

 
 Three Months
Ended Sept. 30,
 Nine Months
Ended Sept. 30,
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Total revenues, net of interest expense

 $205 $1,365 $651 $3,260 
          

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

 $(204)$507 $(635)$898 

Gain (loss) on sale

    9  2  (508)

Provision (benefit) for income taxes and noncontrolling interest, net of taxes

  214  (97) 44  (188)
          

Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes

 $(418)$613 $(677)$578 
          

Cash Flows from Discontinued Operations

 
 Six Months
Ended June 30,
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

Cash flows from operating activities

 $4,137 $(3,938)

Cash flows from investing activities

  (5,443) (2,448)

Cash flows from financing activities

  2,118  6,571 
      

Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations

 $812 $185 
      

 
 Nine Months
Ended Sept. 30,
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

Cash flows from operating activities

 $(1,314)$(6,058)

Cash flows from investing activities

  (9,549) 801 

Cash flows from financing activities

  11,101  5,086 
      

Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations

 $238 $(171)
      

3.     BUSINESS SEGMENTS

        The following table presents certain information regarding the Company's operations by segment:

 
 Revenues, net
of interest expense
 Provision (benefit)
for income taxes
 Income (loss) from
continuing operations(1)
 Identifiable assets(2) 
 
 Three Months Ended June 30,  
  
 
In millions of dollars, except
identifiable assets in billions
 Jun. 30,
2009
 Dec. 31,
2008
 
 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Regional Consumer Banking

 $5,605 $6,881 $(102)$331 $217 $991 $198 $200 

Institutional Clients Group

  9,355  9,885  1,332  1,313  2,841  2,442  787  802 
                  
 

Subtotal Citicorp

  14,960  16,766  1,230  1,644  3,058  3,433  985  1,002 

Citi Holdings

  15,750  2,079  712  (3,323) 1,359  (5,225) 649  715 

Corporate/Other

  (741) (1,307) (1,035) (768) (30) (537) 213  221 
                  

Total

 $29,969 $17,538 $907 $(2,447)$4,387 $(2,329)$1,847 $1,938 
                  

 
 Revenues, net
of interest expense
 Provision (benefit)
for income taxes
 Income (loss) from
continuing operations(1)
 Identifiable assets(2) 
 
 Three Months Ended September 30,  
  
 
In millions of dollars, except
identifiable assets in billions
 Sept. 30,
2009
 Dec. 31,
2008
 
 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Regional Consumer Banking

 $5,675 $6,109 $(246)$24 $615 $446 $205 $200 

Institutional Clients Group

  7,350  9,911  584  1,410  1,694  3,156  809  802 
                  
 

Subtotal Citicorp

  13,025  16,020  338  1,434  2,309  3,602  1,014  1,002 

Citi Holdings

  6,694  704  (1,588) (4,526) (1,818) (6,936) 617  715 

Corporate/Other

  671  (466) 128  (203) 102  (187) 258  221 
                  

Total

 $20,390 $16,258 $(1,122)$(3,295)$593 $(3,521)$1,889 $1,938 
                  

 

 
 Revenues, net
of interest expense
 Provision (benefit)
for income taxes
 Income (loss) from
continuing operations(1)
 
 
 Six Months Ended June 30, 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Regional Consumer Banking

 $11,376 $13,855 $(57)$878 $801 $2,322 

Institutional Clients Group

  24,153  20,020  4,756  2,497  9,939  5,759 
              
 

Subtotal Citicorp

  35,529  33,875  4,699  3,375  10,740  8,081 

Citi Holdings

  19,202  (2,439) (2,974) (9,093) (3,977) (14,375)

Corporate/Other

  (241) (1,741) 17  (615) (682) (1,221)
              

Total

 $54,490 $29,695 $1,742 $(6,333)$6,081 $(7,515)
              

 
 Revenues, net
of interest expense
 Provision (benefit)
for income taxes
 Income (loss) from
continuing operations(1)
 
 
 Nine Months Ended September 30, 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Regional Consumer Banking

 $17,051 $19,964 $(303)$902 $1,416 $2,768 

Institutional Clients Group

  31,503  29,931  5,340  3,907  11,633  8,915 
              
 

Subtotal Citicorp

  48,554  49,895  5,037  4,809  13,049  11,683 

Citi Holdings

  25,896  (1,735) (4,562) (13,619) (5,795) (21,311)

Corporate/Other

  430  (2,207) 145  (818) (580) (1,408)
              

Total

 $74,880 $45,953 $620 $(9,628)$6,674 $(11,036)
              

(1)
Includes pretax provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims in Regional Consumer Banking results of $2.0$1.8 billion and $1.4$1.6 billion, in ICG results of $0.8$0.4 billion and $0.4 billion and in Citi Holdings results of $9.9$6.9 billion and $5.3$7.0 billion for the secondthird quarters of 2009 and 2008, respectively. Includes pretax provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims in Regional Consumer Banking results of $3.8$5.6 billion and $2.7$4.3 billion, ICG results of $1.2$1.6 billion and $0.5$0.9 billion and in Citi Holdings results of $17.9$24.8 billion and $9.8$16.8 billion for the sixnine months of 2009 and 2008, respectively.

(2)
Identifiable assets at JuneSeptember 30, 2009 include assets of discontinued operations held for sale of $19.4$23.6 billion recorded in Corporate/Other.Citi Holdings.

Table of Contents

4.     INTEREST REVENUE AND EXPENSE

        For the three- and six-monthnine-month periods ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008, interest revenue and expense consisted of the following:

 
 Three Months
Ended June 30,
 Six Months
Ended June 30,
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008(1) 2009 2008(1) 

Interest revenue

             

Loan interest, including fees

 $11,929 $15,941 $24,784 $32,355 

Deposits at interest with banks

  377  761  813  1,537 

Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell

  794  2,370  1,679  5,536 

Investments, including dividends

  3,435  2,548  6,611  5,235 

Trading account assets(2)

  2,921  4,634  5,872  9,425 

Other interest

  215  1,083  495  2,410 
          

Total interest revenue

 $19,671 $27,337 $40,254 $56,498 
          

Interest expense

             

Deposits

 $2,840 $5,082 $5,688 $11,276 

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

  931  2,947  2,035  6,838 

Trading account liabilities(2)

  69  450  177  779 

Short-term borrowing

  315  961  778  2,309 

Long-term debt

  2,687  3,911  5,821  8,222 
          

Total interest expense

 $6,842 $13,351 $14,499 $29,424 
          

Net interest revenue

 $12,829 $13,986 $25,755 $27,074 

Provision for loan losses

  12,233  6,983  22,148  12,560 
          

Net interest revenue after provision for loan losses

 $596 $7,003 $3,607 $14,514 
          

 
 Three Months
Ended September 30,
 Nine Months
Ended September 30,
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Interest revenue

             

Loan interest, including fees

 $11,601 $15,528 $36,385 $47,883 

Deposits at interest with banks

  313  792  1,126  2,329 

Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell

  728  2,215  2,407  7,751 

Investments, including dividends

  3,283  2,597  9,894  7,832 

Trading account assets(1)

  2,654  4,137  8,526  13,562 

Other interest

  99  861  594  3,271 
          

Total interest revenue

 $18,678 $26,130 $58,932 $82,628 
          

Interest expense

             

Deposits(2)

 $2,298 $4,915 $7,986 $16,191 

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

  772  2,721  2,807  9,559 

Trading account liabilities(1)

  43  285  220  1,064 

Short-term borrowing

  350  924  1,128  3,233 

Long-term debt

  3,217  3,881  9,038  12,103 
          

Total interest expense

 $6,680 $12,726 $21,179 $42,150 
          

Net interest revenue

 $11,998 $13,404 $37,753 $40,478 

Provision for loan losses

  8,771  8,943  30,919  21,503 
          

Net interest revenue after provision for loan losses

 $3,227 $4,461 $6,834 $18,975 
          

(1)
Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.

(2)
Interest expense on trading account liabilities of the ICG is reported as a reduction of interest revenue forTrading account assets.

(2)
Includes FDIC deposit insurance fees and charges.

Table of Contents

5.     COMMISSIONS AND FEES

        Commissions and fees revenue includes charges to customers for credit and bank cards, including transaction-processing fees and annual fees; advisory and equity and debt underwriting services; lending and deposit-related transactions, such as loan commitments, standby letters of credit, and other deposit and loan servicing activities; investment management-related fees, including brokerage services, and custody and trust services; and insurance fees and commissions.

        The following table presents commissions and fees revenue for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008:

 
 Three Months
Ended June 30,
 Six Months
Ended June 30,
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008(1) 2009 2008(1) 

Loan servicing(2)

 $1,367 $1,393 $1,563 $1,107 

Credit cards and bank cards

  1,000  997  1,977  1,792 

Investment banking

  1,071  1,186  1,885  2,391 

Smith Barney

  321  744  836  1,507 

ICG trading-related

  475  600  822  1,302 

Other Consumer

  324  320  612  635 

Transaction services

  327  364  643  717 

Checking-related

  249  298  512  585 

Other ICG

  80  114  188  244 

Primerica

  76  107  149  217 

Corporate finance(3)

  171  (389) 421  (3,500)

Other

  (24) 65  (3) 143 
          

Total commissions and fees

 $5,437 $5,799 $9,605 $7,140 
          

 
 Three Months
Ended September 30,
 Nine Months
Ended September 30,
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Credit cards and bank cards

 $1,048 $1,113 $3,025 $3,504 

Investment banking

  774  545  2,659  2,337 

Smith Barney

  1  688  837  2,196 

ICG trading-related

  466  628  1,288  1,930 

Other Consumer

  323  235  935  870 

Transaction services

  337  359  980  1,076 

Checking-related

  261  282  773  868 

Other ICG

  176  338  364  582 

Primerica

  78  98  227  315 

Loan servicing(1)

  (339) (336) 1,224  771 

Corporate finance(2)

  130  (649) 551  (4,149)

Other

  (37) (93) (40) 48 
          

Total commissions and fees

 $3,218 $3,208 $12,823 $10,348 
          

(1)
Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.

(2)
Includes fair value adjustments on mortgage servicing assets. The mark-to-market on the underlying economic hedges of the MSRs is included in Other revenue.

(3)(2)
Includes write-downs of approximately $237$24 million for the secondthird quarter of 2009 and $484$508 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009, and $428$792 million for the secondthird quarter of 2008 and $3.5$4.3 billion for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, net of underwriting fees on funded and unfunded highly leveraged finance commitments. Write-downs were recorded on all highly leveraged finance commitments where there was value impairment, regardless of funding date.

Table of Contents

6.     RETIREMENT BENEFITS

        The Company has several non-contributory defined benefit pension plans covering U.S. employees and has various defined benefit pension and termination indemnity plans covering employees outside the United States. The principal U.S. defined benefit plan which formerly covered substantially all U.S. employees, is closed to new entrants and effective January 1, 2008 no longer accrues benefits for most employees. Employees satisfying certain age and service requirements remain covered by a prior final pay formula.

        The Company also offers post-retirementpostretirement health care and life insurance benefits to certain eligible U.S. retired employees, as well as to certain eligible employees outside the United States. For information on the Company's Retirement Benefit Plansretirement benefit plans and Pension Assumptions,pension assumptions, see Citigroup's 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

        The following tables summarize the components of the net expense recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008.

Net Expense (Benefit)

 
 Three Months Ended June 30, 
 
 Pension Plans Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 
 
 U.S. Plans(1) Plans Outside U.S. U.S. Plans Plans Outside U.S. 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 
Benefits earned during the period $6 $7 $34 $52 $ $1 $6 $12 
Interest cost on benefit obligation  163  165  74  99  15  15  22  30 
Expected return on plan assets  (229) (234) (84) (122) (3) (3) (20) (29)
Amortization of unrecognized:                         
 Net transition obligation      (1) 1         
 Prior service cost (benefit)  (2)   2  1         
 Net actuarial loss  2    18  4      5  8 
                  
Net expense (benefit) $(60)$(62)$43 $35 $12 $13 $13 $21 
                  

 
 Three Months Ended September 30, 
 
 Pension Plans Postretirement Benefit Plans 
 
 U.S. Plans(1) Plans Outside U.S. U.S. Plans Plans Outside U.S. 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Benefits earned during the period

 $1 $3 $38 $54 $1 $ $7 $9 

Interest cost on benefit obligation

  177  176  78  93  16  17  23  26 

Expected returns on plan assets

  (232) (245) (87) (128) (2) (4) (19) (29)

Amortization of unrecognized:

                         
 

Net transition obligation

      (1)          
 

Prior service cost (benefit)

      1  1  (1)      
 

Net actuarial loss

  (1)   18  6    3  4  5 

Curtailment (gain) loss

  29               
                  

Net expense (benefit)

 $(26)$(66)$47 $26 $14 $16 $15 $11 
                  

 

 
 Six Months Ended June 30, 
 
 Pension Plans Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 
 
 U.S. Plans(1) Plans Outside U.S. U.S. Plans Plans Outside U.S. 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 
Benefits earned during the period $12 $15 $71 $103 $ $1 $13 $19 
Interest cost on benefit obligation  326  329  144  182  30  30  43  50 
Expected return on plan assets  (458) (467) (162) (250) (5) (5) (38) (57)
Amortization of unrecognized:                         
 Net transition obligation      (1) 1         
 Prior service cost (benefit)  (1) (1) 2  2         
 Net actuarial loss  2    33  13  1    9  11 
                  
Net expense (benefit) $(119)$(124)$87 $51 $26 $26 $27 $23 
                  

 
 Nine Months Ended September 30, 
 
 Pension Plans Postretirement Benefit Plans 
 
 U.S. Plans(1) Plans Outside U.S. U.S. Plans Plans Outside U.S. 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Benefits earned during the period

 $13 $18 $109 $157 $1 $1 $20 $28 

Interest cost on benefit obligation

  503  505  222  275  46  47  66  76 

Expected returns on plan assets

  (690) (712) (249) (378) (7) (9) (57) (86)

Amortization of unrecognized:

                         
 

Net transition obligation

      (1) 1         
 

Prior service cost (benefit)

  (1) (1) 3  3  (1)      
 

Net actuarial loss

  1    51  19  1  3  13  16 

Curtailment (gain) loss

  29               
                  

Net expense (benefit)

 $(145)$(190)$135 $77 $40 $42 $42 $34 
                  

(1)
The U.S. plans exclude nonqualified pension plans for which the net expense was $9$12 million and $10$9 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $19$31 million and $20$29 million for the first sixnine months of 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Table of Contents

Employer Contributions

        Citigroup's pension funding policy for U.S. plans and non-U.S. plans is generally to fund to applicable minimum funding requirements, rather than to the amounts of accumulated benefit obligations. For the U.S. plans, the Company may increase its contributions above the minimum required contribution under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), if appropriate to its tax and cash position and the plan's funded position. At JuneAs of September 30, 2009, and December 31, 2008, therethe Company contributions to the U.S. pension plan include $9 million relating to certain investment advisory fees that were paid by the Company. There were no minimum required contributions and no discretionary cash or non-cash contributions are currently planned for the U.S. plans. For the non-U.S. plans, the Company contributed $79$124 million during the six months ended Juneas of September 30, 2009. Citigroup presently anticipates contributing an additional $152$113 million to fund its non-U.S. plans in the remainder of 2009 for a total of $231$237 million.

7.     RESTRUCTURING

        In the fourth quarter of 2008, Citigroup recorded a pretax restructuring expense of $1.581 billion related to the implementation of a Company-wide re-engineering plan. For the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009, Citigroup recorded a pretax net restructuring release of $32$34 million composed of a gross charge of $25$12 million and a credit of $57$46 million due to changes in estimates. The charges related to the 2008 Re-engineering Projects Restructuring Initiative are reported in the Restructuring line on the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income and are recorded in each segment.

        In 2007, the Company completed a review of its structural expense base in a Company-wide effort to create a more streamlined organization, reduce expense growth, and provide investment funds for future growth initiatives. As a result of this review, a pretax restructuring charge of $1.4 billion was recorded inCorporate/Other during the first quarter of 2007. Additional net charges of $151 million were recognized in subsequent quarters throughout 2007, and net releases of $31 million and $3 million in 2008 and 2009, due to changes in estimates. The charges related to the 2007 Structural Expense Review Restructuring Initiative are reported in the Restructuring line on the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.

        The primary goals of the 2008 Re-engineering Projects Restructuring Initiative and the 2007 Structural Expense Review Restructuring Initiative were:

    eliminate layers of management/improve workforce management;

    consolidate certain back-office, middle-office and corporate functions;

    increase the use of shared services;

    expand centralized procurement; and

    continue to rationalize operational spending on technology.

        The implementation of these restructuring initiatives also caused certain related premises and equipment assets to become redundant. The remaining depreciable lives of these assets were shortened, and accelerated depreciation charges began in the second quarter of 2007 and fourth quarter of 2008 for the 2007 and 2008 initiatives, respectively, in addition to normal scheduled depreciation.


Table of Contents

        The following tables detail the Company's restructuring reserves.

2008 Re-engineering Projects Restructuring Charges

 
 Severance  
  
  
  
 
 
 Contract
termination
costs
 Asset
write-downs(3)
 Employee
termination
cost
 Total
Citigroup
 
In millions of dollars SFAS 112(1) SFAS 146(2) 
Total Citigroup (pretax)                   
Original restructuring charge $1,254 $79 $55 $123 $19 $1,530 
Utilization  (114) (3) (2) (100)   (219)
              
Balance at December 31, 2008 $1,140 $76 $53 $23 $19 $1,311 
              
Additional charge $14 $6 $4 $5 $ $29 
Foreign exchange  (14)     (12) (1) (27)
Utilization  (541) (76) (11) (7) (5) (640)
Changes in estimates  (38) (1)       (39)
              
Balance at March 31, 2009 $561 $5 $46 $9 $13 $634 
              
Additional charge $6 $17 $1 $1 $ $25 
Foreign exchange  26    2  1    29 
Utilization  (190) (19) (8) (3) (1) (221)
Changes in estimates  (53) (1) (1)   (2) (57)
              
Balance at June 30, 2009 $350 $2 $40 $8 $10 $410 
              

 
 Severance  
  
  
  
 
 
 Contract
termination
costs
 Asset
write-downs(3)
 Employee
termination
cost
 Total
Citigroup
 
In millions of dollars ASC 712(1) ASC 420(2) 

Total Citigroup (pretax)

                   

Original restructuring charge

 $1,254 $79 $55 $123 $19 $1,530 
              

Utilization

  (114) (3) (2) (100)   (219)
              

Balance at December 31, 2008

 $1,140 $76 $53 $23 $19 $1,311 
              

Additional charge

 $14 $6 $4 $5 $ $29 

Foreign exchange

  (14)     (12) (1) (27)

Utilization

  (541) (76) (11) (7) (5) (640)

Changes in estimates

  (38) (1)       (39)
              

Balance at March 31, 2009

 $561 $5 $46 $9 $13 $634 
              

Additional charge

 $6 $17 $1 $1 $ $25 

Foreign exchange

  26    2  1    29 

Utilization

  (190) (19) (8) (3) (1) (221)

Changes in estimates

  (53) (1) (1)   (2) (57)
              

Balance at June 30, 2009

 $350 $2 $40 $8 $10 $410 
              

Additional charge

 $ $5 $6 $1 $ $12 

Foreign exchange

  3    1      4 

Utilization

  (84) (6) (6) (2)   (98)

Changes in estimates

  (38)   (2) (4) (2) (46)
              

Balance at September 30, 2009

 $231 $1 $39 $3 $8 $282 
              

Note: The total Citigroup charge in the table above does not include a $51 million one-time pension curtailment charge related to this restructuring initiative, which is recorded as part of the Company'sRestructuring charge in the Consolidated Statement of Income at December 31, 2008.


Table of Contents

2007 Structural Expense Review Restructuring Charges

 
 Severance  
  
  
  
 
 
 Contract
termination
costs
 Asset
write-downs(3)
 Employee
termination
cost
 Total
Citigroup
 
In millions of dollars SFAS 112(1) SFAS 146(2) 
Total Citigroup (pretax)                   
Original restructuring charge $950 $11 $25 $352 $39 $1,377 
Additional charge $42 $96 $29 $27 $11 $205 
Foreign exchange  19    2      21 
Utilization  (547) (75) (28) (363) (33) (1,046)
Changes in estimates  (39)   (6) (1) (8) (54)
              
Balance at December 31, 2007 $425 $32 $22 $15 $9 $503 
              
Additional charge $10 $14 $43 $6 $ $73 
Foreign exchange  (11)   (4)     (15)
Utilization  (288) (34) (22) (7) (6) (357)
Changes in estimates  (93) (2) (2) (4) (3) (104)
              
Balance at December 31, 2008 $43 $10 $37 $10 $ $100 
              
Foreign exchange  (1)   (1)     (2)
Utilization  (41) (10) (35) (9)   (95)
Changes in estimates  (1)   (1) (1)   (3)
              
Balance at March 31, 2009 $ $ $ $ $ $ 
              

 
 Severance  
  
  
  
 
 
 Contract
termination
costs
 Asset
write-downs(3)
 Employee
termination
cost
 Total
Citigroup
 
In millions of dollars ASC 712(1) ASC 420(2) 

Total Citigroup (pretax)

                   

Original restructuring charge

 $950 $11 $25 $352 $39 $1,377 
              

Additional charge

 $42 $96 $29 $27 $11 $205 

Foreign exchange

  19    2      21 

Utilization

  (547) (75) (28) (363) (33) (1,046)

Changes in estimates

  (39)   (6) (1) (8) (54)
              

Balance at December 31, 2007

 $425 $32 $22 $15 $9 $503 
              

Additional charge

 $10 $14 $43 $6 $ $73 

Foreign exchange

  (11)   (4)     (15)

Utilization

  (288) (34) (22) (7) (6) (357)

Changes in estimates

  (93) (2) (2) (4) (3) (104)
              

Balance at December 31, 2008

 $43 $10 $37 $10 $ $100 
              

Foreign exchange

  (1)   (1)     (2)

Utilization

  (41) (10) (35) (9)   (95)

Changes in estimates

  (1)   (1) (1)   (3)
              

Balance at March 31, 2009

 $ $ $ $ $ $ 
              

(1)
Accounted for in accordance with SFASASC 712 (SFAS No. 112,Employer's Accounting for Post Employment BenefitsBenefits) (SFAS 112/ASC 712-10).

(2)
Accounted for in accordance with SFASASC 420 (SFAS No. 146,Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal ActivitiesActivities) (SFAS 146/ASC 420-10).

(3)
Accounted for in accordance with SFASASC 360 (SFAS No. 144,Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived AssetsAssets) (SFAS 144/ASC 360-10).

Note: The 2007 structural expense review restructuring initiative was fully utilized as of March 31, 2009.


Table of Contents

        The total restructuring reserve balance and total charges as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 related to the 2008 Re-engineering Projects Restructuring Initiatives are presented below by business in the following tables. These charges are reported in the Restructuring line on the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income and are recorded in each business.

2008 Re-engineering Projects

 
 For the quarter ended June 30, 2009 
In millions of dollars Total
restructuring
reserve
balance as of
June 30,
2009
 Restructuring
charges
recorded in the
three months
ended June 30,
2009
 Total
restructuring
charges since
inception(1)(2)
 
Citicorp $198 $10 $859 
Citi Holdings  34  10  246 
Corporate/Other  178  5  383 
        
Total Citigroup (pretax) $410 $25 $1,488 
        

 
 For the quarter ended September 30, 2009 
In millions of dollars Total
restructuring
reserve
balance as of
September 30,
2009
 Restructuring
charges
recorded in the
three months
ended September 30,
2009
 Total
restructuring
charges since
inception(1)(2)
 

Citicorp

 $132 $5 $846 

Citi Holdings

  14  1  239 

Corporate/Other

  136  6  369 
        

Total Citigroup (pretax)

 $282 $12 $1,454 
        

(1)
Excludes pension curtailment charges of $51 million recorded during the fourth quarter of 2008.

(2)
Amounts shown net of $46 million, $57 million and $39 million related to changes in estimates recorded during the third, second quarter and first quarterquarters of 2009, respectively.
 
 For the year ended December 31, 2008 
In millions of dollars
 Total
restructuring
reserve
balance as of
December 31,
2008
 Total
restructuring
charges(1)
 
Citicorp $789 $890 
Citi Holdings  184  267 
Corporate/Other  338  373 
      
Total Citigroup (pretax) $1,311 $1,530 
      

 
 For the year ended December 31, 2008 
In millions of dollars Total
restructuring
reserve
balance as of
December 31,
2008
 Total
restructuring
charges(1)
 

Citicorp

 $789 $890 

Citi Holdings

  184  267 

Corporate/Other

  338  373 
      

Total Citigroup (pretax)

 $1,311 $1,530 
      

(1)
Represents the total charges incurred since inception and excludes pension curtailment charges of $51 million recorded during the fourth quarter of 2008.

Table of Contents

8.     EARNINGS PER SHARE

        The following is a reconciliation of the income and share data used in the basic and diluted earnings per share computations for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008:

 
 Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, 
In millions, except per share amounts 2009 2008(1) 2009 2008(1) 
Income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests $4,387 $(2,329)$6,081 $(7,515)
Noncontrolling interest  (34) 72  (50) 56 
          
Net income (loss) from continuing operations (for EPS purposes) $4,421 $(2,401)$6,131 $(7,571)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes  (142) (94) (259) (35)
          
Citigroup's net income (loss) $4,279 $(2,495)$5,872 $(7,606)
Preferred dividends  (1,495) (361) (2,716) (444)
Impact on the conversion price reset related to the $12.5 billion convertible preferred stock private issuance(2)      (1,285)  
Preferred stock Series H discount accretion  (54)   (107)  
          
Income (loss) available to common stockholders for basic EPS(3)  2,730  (2,856) 1,764  (8,050)
Effect of dilutive securities  270  270  540  336 
          
Income (loss) available to common stockholders for diluted EPS(4) $3,000 $(2,586)$2,304 $(7,714)
          
Weighted average common shares outstanding applicable to basic EPS  5,399.5  5,287.4  5,392.3  5,186.5 
Effect of dilutive securities:             
Convertible securities  568.3  489.2  568.3  489.2 
Options    0.2    0.6 
          
Adjusted weighted average common shares outstanding applicable to diluted EPS(3)  5,967.8  5,776.8  5,960.6  5,676.3 
          
Basic earnings per share(3)(4)             
Income (loss) from continuing operations $0.51 $(0.53)$0.36 $(1.56)
Discontinued operations  (0.02) (0.02) (0.05) (0.01)
          
Net income (loss) $0.49 $(0.55)$0.31 $(1.57)
Diluted earnings per share(3)(4)             
Income (loss) from continuing operations $0.51 $(0.53)$0.36 $(1.56)
Discontinued operations  (0.02) (0.02) (0.05) (0.01)
          
Net income (loss) $0.49 $(0.55)$0.31 $(1.57)
          

 
 Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, 
In millions, except per share amounts 2009 2008(1) 2009 2008(1) 

Income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests

 $593 $(3,521)$6,674 $(11,036)

Noncontrolling interest

  74  (93) 24  (37)
          

Net income (loss) from continuing operations (for EPS purposes)

 $519 $(3,428)$6,650 $(10,999)

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

  (418) 613  (677) 578 
          

Citigroup's net income (loss)

 $101 $(2,815)$5,973 $(10,421)

Preferred dividends

  (272) (389) (2,988) (833)

Impact of the conversion price reset related to the $12.5 billion convertible preferred stock private issuance(2)

      (1,285)  

Preferred stock Series H discount accretion

  (16)   (123)  

Impact of the Public and Private Preferred Stock exchange offer

  (3,055)   (3,055)  
          

Income (loss) available to common stockholders

  (3,242) (3,204) (1,478) (11,254)

Allocation of dividends to common stock and participating securities, net of forfeitures

    (1,738) (63) (5,151)

Undistributed earnings (loss) for basic EPS(3)

  (3,242) (4,942) (1,541) (16,405)

Effect of dilutive securities

    270  540  606 
          

Undistributed earnings (loss) for diluted EPS(4)

 $(3,242)$(4,672)$(1,001)$(15,799)
          

Weighted average common shares outstanding applicable to basic EPS

  12,104.3  5,341.8  7,629.6  5,238.3 

Effect of dilutive securities:

             

Convertible securities

  111.7  489.2  416.1  489.2 

Options

    0.1    0.4 
          

Adjusted weighted average common shares outstanding applicable to diluted EPS(3)

  12,216.0  5,831.1  8,045.7  5,727.9 
          

Basic earnings per share(3)(4)

             

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $(0.23)$(0.72)$(0.10)$(2.28)

Discontinued operations

  (0.04) 0.11  (0.09) 0.11 
          

Net income (loss)

 $(0.27)$(0.61)$(0.19)$(2.17)

Diluted earnings per share(3)(4)

             

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $(0.23)$(0.72)$(0.10)$(2.28)

Discontinued operations

  (0.04) 0.11  (0.09) 0.11 
          

Net income (loss)

 $(0.27)$(0.61)$(0.19)$(2.17)
          

(1)
The Company adopted FSP EITF 03-6-1(ASC 260-10-45 to 65)65 (FSP EITF 03-6-1) on January 1, 2009. All prior periods have been restated to conform to the current period's presentation.

(2)
The sixFor the nine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009, income available to common shareholders includes a reduction of $1,285 million related to the conversion price reset pursuant to Citigroup's prior agreement with the purchasers of $12.5 billion convertible preferred stock issued in a private offering in January 2008. The conversion price was reset from $31.62 per share to $26.35 per share.

(3)
Due to the net loss available to common shareholders for Basic EPS in the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008, loss available to common stockholders for basic EPS was used to calculate Diluted earnings per share. Adding back the effect of dilutive securities would result in anti-dilution.

(4)
Due to the net loss available to common shareholders for Diluted EPS in the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008, basic shares were used to calculate Diluted earnings per share. Adding dilutive securities to the denominator would result in anti-dilution.

Table of Contents

9.     TRADING ACCOUNT ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

        Trading account assets and liabilities, at fair value, consisted of the following at JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:

In millions of dollars June 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

Trading account assets

       

Trading mortgage-backed securities

       
 

Agency guaranteed

 $27,174 $32,981 
 

Prime

  1,051  1,416 
 

Alt-A

  1,307  913 
 

Subprime

  10,583  14,552 
 

Non-U.S. residential

  1,586  2,447 
 

Commercial

  3,635  2,501 
      

Total Trading mortgage-backed securities

 $45,336 $54,810 
      

U.S. Treasury and Federal Agencies

       
 

U.S. Treasuries

 $9,763 $7,370 
 

Agency and direct obligations

  4,290  4,017 
      

Total U.S. Treasury and Federal Agencies

 $14,053 $11,387 
      

State and municipal securities

 $6,056 $9,510 

Foreign government securities

  57,670  57,422 

Corporate

  55,780  54,654 

Derivatives(1)

  73,158  115,289 

Equity securities

  39,932  48,503 

Other debt securities

  33,052  26,060 
      

Total trading account assets

 $325,037 $377,635 
      

Trading account liabilities

       

Securities sold, not yet purchased

 $55,764 $50,693 

Derivatives(1)

  63,548  116,785 
      

Total trading account liabilities

 $119,312 $167,478 
      

In millions of dollars September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

Trading account assets

       

Trading mortgage-backed securities

       
 

Agency guaranteed

 $23,549 $32,981 
 

Prime

  1,177  1,416 
 

Alt-A

  1,305  913 
 

Subprime

  10,638  14,552 
 

Non-U.S. residential

  1,923  2,447 
 

Commercial

  3,975  2,501 
      

Total trading mortgage-backed securities

 $42,567 $54,810 
      

U.S. Treasury and Federal Agencies

       
 

U.S. Treasuries

 $20,803 $7,370 
 

Agency and direct obligations

  3,933  4,017 
      

Total U.S. Treasury and Federal Agencies

 $24,736 $11,387 
      

State and municipal securities

 $7,196 $9,510 

Foreign government securities

  66,425  57,422 

Corporate

  47,485  54,654 

Derivatives(1)

  68,670  115,289 

Equity securities

  46,463  48,503 

Other debt securities

  37,155  26,060 
      

Total trading account assets

 $340,697 $377,635 
      

Trading account liabilities

       

Securities sold, not yet purchased

 $67,988 $50,693 

Derivatives(1)

  62,552  115,107 
      

Total trading account liabilities

 $130,540 $165,800 
      

(1)
Presented net, pursuant to master netting agreements. See Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Derivatives Activities, for a discussion regarding the accounting and reporting for derivatives.

Table of Contents

10.   INVESTMENTS

In millions of dollars June 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

Securities available-for-sale

 $191,238 $175,189 

Debt securities held-to-maturity(1)

  59,622  64,459 

Non-marketable equity securities carried at fair value(2)

  7,935  9,262 

Non-marketable equity securities carried at cost(3)

  7,962  7,110 
      

Total investments

 $266,757 $256,020 
      

In millions of dollars September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

Securities available-for-sale

 $190,252 $175,189 

Debt securities held-to-maturity(1)

  55,816  64,459 

Non-marketable equity securities carried at fair value(2)

  7,765  9,262 

Non-marketable equity securities carried at cost(3)

  8,057  7,110 
      

Total investments

 $261,890 $256,020 
      

(1)
Recorded at amortized cost.

(2)
Unrealized gains and losses for non-marketable equity securities carried at fair value are recognized in earnings.

(3)
Non-marketable equity securities carried at cost primarily consist of shares issued by the Federal Reserve Bank, Federal Home Loan Bank, foreign central banks and various clearing houses of which Citigroup is a member.

Securities Available-for-Sale

        The amortized cost and fair value of securities available-for-sale (AFS) at JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were as follows:

 
 June 30, 2009 December 31, 2008(1) 
In millions of dollars Amortized
cost
 Gross
unrealized
gains
 Gross
unrealized
losses
 Fair
value
 Amortized
cost
 Gross
unrealized
gains
 Gross
unrealized
losses
 Fair
value
 

Debt securities available-for-sale:

                         

Mortgage-backed securities

                         
 

U.S. government agency guaranteed

 $28,289 $377 $225 $28,441 $23,527 $261 $67 $23,721 
 

Prime

  8,017  86  2,070  6,033  8,475  3  2,965  5,513 
 

Alt-A

  483  52  12  523  54    9  45 
 

Subprime

  35    18  17  38    21  17 
 

Non-U.S. residential

  286    7  279  185  2    187 
 

Commercial

  947  3  161  789  519    134  385 
                  

Total mortgage-backed securities

 $38,057 $518 $2,493 $36,082 $32,798 $266 $3,196  29,868 

U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

                         
 

U.S. Treasury

  7,730  10  129  7,611  3,465  125    3,590 
 

Agency obligations

  16,738  35  96  16,677  20,237  215  77  20,375 
                  

Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

 $24,468 $45 $225 $24,288 $23,702 $340 $77 $23,965 

State and municipal

  19,890  93  2,305  17,678  18,156  38  4,370  13,824 

Foreign government

  74,590  914  350  75,154  79,505  945  408  80,042 

Corporate

  21,388  266  333  21,321  10,646  65  680  10,031 

Other debt securities

  11,387  123  620  10,890  11,784  36  224  11,596 
                  

Total debt securities available- for-sale

  189,780  1,959  6,326  185,413  176,591  1,690  8,955  169,326 
                  

Marketable equity securities available-for-sale

  4,339  2,299  813  5,825  5,768  554  459  5,863 
                  

Total securities available-for-sale

 $194,119 $4,258 $7,139 $191,238 $182,359 $2,244 $9,414 $175,189 
                  

 
 September 30, 2009 December 31, 2008(1) 
In millions of dollars Amortized
cost
 Gross
unrealized
gains
 Gross
unrealized
losses
 Fair
value
 Amortized
cost
 Gross
unrealized
gains
 Gross
unrealized
losses
 Fair
value
 

Debt securities available-for-sale:

                         

Mortgage-backed securities

                         
 

U.S. government agency guaranteed

 $23,163 $487 $31 $23,619 $23,527 $261 $67 $23,721 
 

Prime

  7,436  102  1,260  6,278  8,475  3  2,965  5,513 
 

Alt-A

  390  86  6  470  54    9  45 
 

Subprime

  36    17  19  38    21  17 
 

Non-U.S. residential

  271    5  266  185  2    187 
 

Commercial

  919  10  120  809  519    134  385 
                  

Total mortgage-backed securities

  32,215  685  1,439  31,461  32,798  266  3,196  29,868 

U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

                         
 

U.S. Treasury

  6,194  41  1  6,234  3,465  125    3,590 
 

Agency obligations

  16,897  84  14  16,967  20,237  215  77  20,375 
                  

Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

  23,091  125  15  23,201  23,702  340  77  23,965 

State and municipal

  17,967  197  1,339  16,825  18,156  38  4,370  13,824 

Foreign government

  79,965  974  268  80,671  79,505  945  408  80,042 

Corporate

  20,444  436  172  20,708  10,646  65  680  10,031 

Other debt securities

  11,701  201  255  11,647  11,784  36  224  11,596 
                  

Total debt securities available- for-sale

  185,383  2,618  3,488  184,513  176,591  1,690  8,955  169,326 
                  

Marketable equity securities available-for-sale

  4,065  1,929  255  5,739  5,768  554  459  5,863 
                  

Total securities available-for-sale

 $189,448 $4,547 $3,743 $190,252 $182,359 $2,244 $9,414 $175,189 
                  

(1)
Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.

        The Company conducts and documents periodic reviews of all securities with unrealized losses to evaluate whether the impairment is other than temporary. As discussed in more detail below, prior to January 1, 2009, these reviews were conducted pursuant to FASB Staff Position No. 115-1,The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments (FSP FAS 115-1/ASC(ASC 320-10-35). Any unrealized loss identified as other than temporary was recorded directly in the Consolidated Statement of Income. As of January 1, 2009, the Company adopted FSPASC 320-10-65-1 (FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 (ASC 320-10-65-1)124-2). Accordingly, any credit-related impairment related to debt securities the Company does not plan to sell and is more-likely-than-not will not to be required to sell is recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income, with the non-credit-related impairment recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (OCI). For other impaired debt securities, the entire impairment is recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.


Table of Contents

The table below shows the fair value of investments in AFS securities that have been in an unrealized loss position for less than 12 months or for 12 months or longer as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:

 
 Less than 12 months 12 months or longer Total 
In millions of dollar Fair
value
 Gross
unrealized
losses
 Fair
value
 Gross
unrealized
losses
 Fair
value
 Gross
unrealized
losses
 

June 30, 2009

                   

Securities available-for-sale

                   

Mortgage-backed securities

                   
 

U.S. government agency guaranteed

 $9,754 $108 $2,116 $117 $11,870 $225 
 

Prime

  5,019  2,016  256  54  5,275  2,070 
 

Alt-A

  94  2  49  10  143  12 
 

Subprime

  4  1  13  17  17  18 
 

Non-U.S. residential

  279  7      279  7 
 

Commercial

  118  55  499  106  617  161 
              

Total mortgage-backed securities

  15,268  2,189  2,933  304  18,201  2,493 

U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

                   
 

U.S. Treasury

  4,841  125  49  4  4,890  129 
 

Agency obligations

  4,306  89  2,223  7  6,529  96 
              

Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

  9,147  214  2,272  11  11,419  225 

State and municipal

  11,084  1,297  4,500  1,008  15,584  2,305 

Foreign government

  11,563  164  5,733  186  17,296  350 

Corporate

  2,039  84  1,947  249  3,986  333 

Other debt securities

  404  98  4,871  522  5,275  620 

Marketable equity securities available-for-sale

  2,063  742  134  71  2,197  813 
              

Total securities available-for-sale

 $51,568 $4,788 $22,390 $2,351 $73,958 $7,139 
              

December 31, 2008(1)

                   

Securities available-for-sale

                   

Mortgage-backed securities

                   
 

U.S. government agency guaranteed

 $5,281 $9 $432 $58 $5,713 $67 
 

Prime

  2,258  1,127  3,108  1,838  5,366  2,965 
 

Alt-A

  38  8  5  1  43  9 
 

Subprime

      15  21  15  21 
 

Non- U.S. residential

  10        10   
 

Commercial

  213  33  233  101  446  134 
              

Total mortgage-backed securities

  7,800  1,177  3,793  2,019  11,593  3,196 

U.S. Treasury and federal agencies

                   
 

U.S. Treasury

             
 

Agency obligations

  1,654  76  1  1  1,655  77 
              

Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

  1,654  76  1  1  1,655  77 

State and municipal

  12,827  3,872  3,762  498  16,589  4,370 

Foreign government

  10,697  201  9,080  207  19,777  408 

Corporate

  1,985  270  4,393  410  6,378  680 

Other debt securities

  944  96  303  128  1,247  224 

Marketable equity securities available-for-sale

  3,254  386  102  73  3,356  459 
              

Total securities available-for-sale

 $39,161 $6,078 $21,434 $3,336 $60,595 $9,414 
              

 
 Less than 12 months 12 months or longer Total 
In millions of dollar Fair
value
 Gross
unrealized
losses
 Fair
value
 Gross
unrealized
losses
 Fair
value
 Gross
unrealized
losses
 

September 30, 2009

                   

Securities available-for-sale

                   

Mortgage-backed securities

                   
 

U.S. government agency guaranteed

 $3,024 $23 $300 $8 $3,324 $31 
 

Prime

  4,999  1,224  268  36  5,267  1,260 
 

Alt-A

  90    47  6  137  6 
 

Subprime

  4    13  17  17  17 
 

Non-U.S. residential

  266  5      266  5 
 

Commercial

  84  64  389  56  473  120 
              

Total mortgage-backed securities

  8,467  1,316  1,017  123  9,484  1,439 

U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

                   
 

U.S. Treasury

  97    61  1  158  1 
 

Agency obligations

  2,995  14  1    2,996  14 
              

Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

  3,092  14  62  1  3,154  15 

State and municipal

  4,321  214  877  1,125  5,198  1,339 

Foreign government

  22,290  129  5,732  139  28,022  268 

Corporate

  956  56  1,266  116  2,222  172 

Other debt securities

  1,183  93  1,378  162  2,561  255 

Marketable equity securities available-for-sale

  2,555  225  117  30  2,672  255 
              

Total securities available-for-sale

 $42,864 $2,047 $10,449 $1,696 $53,313 $3,743 
              

December 31, 2008(1)

                   

Securities available-for-sale

                   

Mortgage-backed securities

                   
 

U.S. government agency guaranteed

 $5,281 $9 $432 $58 $5,713 $67 
 

Prime

  2,258  1,127  3,108  1,838  5,366  2,965 
 

Alt-A

  38  8  5  1  43  9 
 

Subprime

      15  21  15  21 
 

Non-U.S. residential

  10        10   
 

Commercial

  213  33  233  101  446  134 
              

Total mortgage-backed securities

  7,800  1,177  3,793  2,019  11,593  3,196 

U.S. Treasury and federal agencies

                   
 

U.S. Treasury

             
 

Agency obligations

  1,654  76  1  1  1,655  77 
              

Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

  1,654  76  1  1  1,655  77 

State and municipal

  12,827  3,872  3,762  498  16,589  4,370 

Foreign government

  10,697  201  9,080  207  19,777  408 

Corporate

  1,985  270  4,393  410  6,378  680 

Other debt securities

  944  96  303  128  1,247  224 

Marketable equity securities available-for-sale

  3,254  386  102  73  3,356  459 
              

Total securities available-for-sale

 $39,161 $6,078 $21,434 $3,336 $60,595 $9,414 
              

(1)
Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.

Table of Contents

        The following table presents the amortized cost and fair value of AFS debt securities AFS by contractual maturity dates as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009, and December 31, 2008:

 
 June 30, 2009 December 31, 2008(1) 
In millions of dollars Amortized
cost
 Fair
value
 Amortized
cost
 Fair
value
 

Mortgage-backed securities(2)

             

Due within 1 year

 $18 $18 $87 $80 

After 1 but within 5 years

  146  142  639  567 

After 5 but within 10 years

  700  663  1,362  1,141 

After 10 years(3)

  37,193  35,259  30,710  28,080 
          

Total

 $38,057 $36,082 $32,798 $29,868 
          

U.S. Treasury and federal agencies

             

Due within 1 year

 $7,560 $7,556 $15,736 $15,846 

After 1 but within 5 years

  6,609  6,593  5,755  5,907 

After 5 but within 10 years

  5,864  5,832  1,902  1,977 

After 10 years(3)

  4,435  4,307  309  235 
          

Total

 $24,468 $24,288 $23,702 $23,965 
          

State and municipal

             

Due within 1 year

 $216 $212 $214 $214 

After 1 but within 5 years

  129  134  84  84 

After 5 but within 10 years

  690  703  411  406 

After 10 years(3)

  18,855  16,629  17,447  13,120 
          

Total

 $19,890 $17,678 $18,156 $13,824 
          

Foreign government

             

Due within 1 year

 $29,089 $28,291 $26,481 $26,937 

After 1 but within 5 years

  37,851  38,045  45,652  45,462 

After 5 but within 10 years

  6,380  6,101  6,771  6,899 

After 10 years(3)

  1,270  2,717  601  744 
          

Total

 $74,590 $75,154 $79,505 $80,042 
          

All other(4)

             

Due within 1 year

 $3,152 $3,152 $4,160 $4,319 

After 1 but within 5 years

  23,273  22,782  2,662  2,692 

After 5 but within 10 years

  2,669  2,199  12,557  11,842 

After 10 years(3)

  3,681  4,078  3,051  2,774 
          

Total

 $32,775 $32,211 $22,430 $21,627 
          

Total debt securities available-for-sale

 $189,780 $185,413 $176,591 $169,326 
          

 
 September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008(1)
 
In millions of dollars Amortized
Cost
 Fair
value
 Amortized
cost
 Fair
value
 

Mortgage-backed securities(2)

             

Due within 1 year

 $2 $2 $87 $80 

After 1 but within 5 years

  29  30  639  567 

After 5 but within 10 years

  690  658  1,362  1,141 

After 10 years(3)

  31,494  30,771  30,710  28,080 
          

Total

 $32,215 $31,461 $32,798 $29,868 
          

U.S. Treasury and federal agencies

             

Due within 1 year

 $5,546 $5,556 $15,736 $15,846 

After 1 but within 5 years

  7,600  7,629  5,755  5,907 

After 5 but within 10 years

  6,535  6,593  1,902  1,977 

After 10 years(3)

  3,410  3,423  309  235 
          

Total

 $23,091 $23,201 $23,702 $23,965 
          

State and municipal

             

Due within 1 year

 $219 $219 $214 $214 

After 1 but within 5 years

  111  121  84  84 

After 5 but within 10 years

  354  381  411  406 

After 10 years(3)

  17,283  16,104  17,447  13,120 
          

Total

 $17,967 $16,825 $18,156 $13,824 
          

Foreign government

             

Due within 1 year

 $34,753 $34,824 $26,481 $26,937 

After 1 but within 5 years

  37,442  37,945  45,652  45,462 

After 5 but within 10 years

  6,711  6,706  6,771  6,899 

After 10 years(3)

  1,059  1,196  601  744 
          

Total

 $79,965 $80,671 $79,505 $80,042 
          

All other(4)

             

Due within 1 year

 $2,893 $2,883 $4,160 $4,319 

After 1 but within 5 years

  23,456  23,711  2,662  2,692 

After 5 but within 10 years

  3,282  3,327  12,557  11,842 

After 10 years(3)

  2,514  2,434  3,051  2,774 
          

Total

 $32,145 $32,355 $22,430 $21,627 
          

Total debt securities available-for-sale

 $185,383 $184,513 $176,591 $169,326 
          

(1)
Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.

(2)
Includes mortgage-backed securities of U.S. federal agencies.

(3)
Investments with no stated maturities are included as contractual maturities of greater than 10 years. Actual maturities may differ due to call or prepayment rights.

(4)
Includes corporate securities and other debt securities.

        The following tables present interest and dividends on investments for the periods ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008:

 
 Three months ended 
In millions of dollars June 30,
2009
 June 30,
2008
 

Taxable interest

 $3,115 $2,194 

Interest exempt from U.S. federal income tax

  247  210 

Dividends

  73  144 
      

Total interest and dividends

 $3,435 $2,548 
      

 
 Three months ended 
In millions of dollars Sept 30,
2009
 Sept 30,
2008
 

Taxable interest

 $2,956 $2,334 

Interest exempt from U.S. federal income tax

  226  136 

Dividends

  101  127 
      

Total interest and dividends

 $3,283 $2,597 
      

 

 
 Six months ended 
In millions of dollars June 30,
2009
 June 30,
2008
 

Taxable interest

 $6,031 $4,583 

Interest exempt from U.S. federal income tax

  462  399 

Dividends

  118  253 
      

Total interest and dividends

 $6,611 $5,235 
      

 
 Nine months ended 
In millions of dollars Sept 30,
2009
 Sept 30,
2008
 

Taxable interest

 $9,084 $7,019 

Interest exempt from U.S. federal income tax

  591  433 

Dividends

  219  380 
      

Total interest and dividends

 $9,894 $7,832 
      

        The following table presents realized gains and losses on investments for the periods ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008. The gross realized investment losses exclude losses from other-than-temporary impairment:

 
 Three months ended Six months ended 
In millions of dollars June 30,
2009
 June 30,
2008
 June 30,
2009
 June 30,
2008
 

Gross realized investment gains

 $577 $75 $1,358 $314 

Gross realized investment losses

  (42) (46) (66) (88)
          

Net realized gains (losses)

 $535 $29 $1,292 $226 
          

 
 Three months ended Nine months ended 
In millions of dollars Sept 30,
2009
 Sept 30,
2008
 Sept 30,
2009
 Sept 30,
2008
 

Gross realized investment gains

 $439 $192 $1,797 $506 

Gross realized investment losses

  (12) (42) (78) (130)
          

Net realized gains (losses)

 $427 $150 $1,719 $376 
          

Table of Contents

Debt Securities Held-to-Maturity

        The carrying value and fair value of securities held-to-maturity (HTM) at JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were as follows:

In millions of dollars Amortized
cost(1)
 Net unrealized
loss recognized
in OCI
 Carrying
value(2)
 Gross
unrecognized
gains
 Gross
unrecognized
losses
 Fair
value
 
June 30, 2009                   
Debt securities held-to-maturity                   
Mortgage-backed securities                   
 U.S. government agency guaranteed $ $ $ $�� $ $ 
 Prime  6,991  1,362  5,629  5  1,000  4,634 
 Alt-A  16,309  4,902  11,407  52  2,446  9,013 
 Subprime  1,122  178  944  3  119  828 
 Non-U.S. residential  9,702  1,195  8,507  160  624  8,043 
 Commercial  1,124  23  1,101    392  709 
              
 Total mortgage-backed securities  35,248  7,660  27,588  220  4,581  23,227 
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities                   
 U.S. Treasury             
 Agency and direct obligations             
              
 Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities             
State and municipal  3,265  142  3,123  38  358  2,803 
Corporate  7,220  218  7,002  187  526  6,663 
Asset-backed securities  22,334  426  21,908  647  824  21,731 
Other debt securities  5  4  1      1 
              
Total debt securities held-to-maturity $68,072 $8,450 $59,622 $1,092 $6,289 $54,425 
              
December 31, 2008(3)                   
Debt securities held-to-maturity                   
Mortgage-backed securities                   
 U.S. government agency guaranteed $ $ $ $ $ $ 
 Prime  7,481  1,436  6,045    623  5,422 
 Alt-A  16,658  4,216  12,442  23  1,802  10,663 
 Subprime  1,368  125  1,243  15  163  1,095 
 Non-U.S. residential  10,496  1,128  9,368  5  397  8,976 
 Commercial  1,021    1,021    130  891 
              
 Total mortgage-backed securities  37,024  6,905  30,119  43  3,115  27,047 
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities                   
 U.S. Treasury  1    1      1 
 Agency and direct obligations             
              
 Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities  1    1      1 
State and municipal  3,371  183  3,188  14  253  2,949 
Corporate  6,906  175  6,731  130  305  6,556 
Asset-backed securities  22,698  415  22,283  86  555  21,814 
Other debt securities  2,478  341  2,137    127  2,010 
              
Total debt securities held-to-maturity $72,478 $8,019 $64,459 $273 $4,355 $60,377 
              

In millions of dollars Amortized
cost(1)
 Net unrealized
loss recognized
in OCI
 Carrying
value(2)
 Gross
unrecognized
gains
 Gross
unrecognized
losses
 Fair
value
 

September 30, 2009

                   

Debt securities held-to-maturity

                   

Mortgage-backed securities

                   
 

U.S. government agency guaranteed

 $ $ $ $ $ $ 
 

Prime

  6,388  1,211  5,177  50  50  5,177 
 

Alt-A

  15,436  4,609  10,827  411  419  10,819 
 

Subprime

  1,165  171  994  56  117  933 
 

Non-U.S. residential

  9,485  1,168  8,317  364  240  8,441 
 

Commercial

  1,308  52  1,256    377  879 
              
 

Total mortgage-backed securities

  33,782  7,211  26,571  881  1,203  26,249 

U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

                   
 

U.S. Treasury

             
 

Agency and direct obligations

             
              
 

Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

             

State and municipal

  3,169  146  3,023  200  138  3,085 

Corporate

  7,365  307  7,058  472  138  7,392 

Asset-backed securities

  19,590  427  19,163  435  722  18,876 

Other debt securities

  7  6  1      1 
              

Total debt securities held-to-maturity

 $63,913 $8,097 $55,816 $1,988 $2,201 $55,603 
              

December 31, 2008

                   

Debt securities held-to-maturity

                   

Mortgage-backed securities

                   
 

U.S. government agency guaranteed

 $ $ $ $ $ $ 
 

Prime

  7,481  1,436  6,045    623  5,422 
 

Alt-A

  16,658  4,216  12,442  23  1,802  10,663 
 

Subprime

  1,368  125  1,243  15  163  1,095 
 

Non-U.S. residential

  10,496  1,128  9,368  5  397  8,976 
 

Commercial

  1,021    1,021    130  891 
              
 

Total mortgage-backed securities

  37,024  6,905  30,119  43  3,115  27,047 

U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

                   
 

U.S. Treasury

  1    1      1 
 

Agency and direct obligations

             
              
 

Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

  1    1      1 

State and municipal

  3,371  183  3,188  14  253  2,949 

Corporate

  6,906  175  6,731  130  305  6,556 

Asset-backed securities

  22,698  415  22,283  86  555  21,814 

Other debt securities

  2,478  341  2,137    127  2,010 
              

Total debt securities held-to-maturity

 $72,478 $8,019 $64,459 $273 $4,355 $60,377 
              

(1)
For securities transferred to HTM fromTrading account assets, amortized cost is defined as the fair value amount of the securities at the date of transfer. For securities transferred to HTM from AFS, amortized cost is defined as the original purchase cost, plus or minus any accretion or amortization of interest, less any impairment previously recognized in earnings.

(2)
HTM securities are carried on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at amortized cost and the changes in the value of these securities, other than impairment charges, are not reported on the financial statements.

(3)
Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.

        The net unrealized losses classified in accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) that relate to debt securities reclassified from AFS investments to HTM investments, and to additional declines in fair value for HTM securities that suffer credit impairment. The balance was $8.5$8.1 billion as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009, compared to $8.0 billion as of December 31, 2008. This balance is amortized over the remaining life of the related securities as an adjustment of yield in a manner consistent with the accretion of discount on the same transferred debt securities. This will have no impact on the Company's net income because the amortization of the unrealized holding loss reported in equity will offset the effect on interest income of the accretion of the discount on these securities.


Table of Contents

        The table below shows the fair value of investments in HTM that have been in an unrealized loss position for less than 12 months or for 12 months or longer as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:

 
 Less than 12 months 12 months or longer Total 
In millions of dollars Fair
value
 Gross
unrealized
losses
 Fair
value
 Gross
unrealized
losses
 Fair
value
 Gross
unrealized
losses
 
June 30, 2009                   
Debt securities held-to-maturity                   
Mortgage-backed securities $5,548 $1,405 $13,244 $3,176 $18,792 $4,581 
State and municipal  951  358      951  358 
Corporate  3,997  525  134  1  4,131  526 
Asset-backed securities  6,132  778  1,397  46  7,529  824 
Other debt securities             
              
Total debt securities held-to-maturity $16,628 $3,066 $14,775 $3,223 $31,403 $6,289 
              
December 31, 2008(1)                   
Debt securities held-to-maturity                   
Mortgage-backed securities $2,348 $631 $24,236 $2,484 $26,584 $3,115 
State and municipal  2,499  253      2,499  253 
Corporate  23    4,107  305  4,130  305 
Asset-backed securities  9,051  381  4,164  174  13,215  555 
Other debt securities  439    5,246  127  5,685  127 
              
Total debt securities held-to-maturity $14,360 $1,265 $37,753 $3,090 $52,113 $4,355 
              


(1)
Reclassified to conform to current period's presentation.
 
 Less than 12 months 12 months or longer Total 
In millions of dollars Fair
value
 Gross
unrealized
losses
 Fair
value
 Gross
unrealized
losses
 Fair
value
 Gross
unrealized
losses
 

September 30, 2009

                   

Debt securities held-to-maturity

                   

Mortgage-backed securities

 $5,235 $1,046 $13,656 $157 $18,891 $1,203 

State and municipal

  733  138      733  138 

Corporate

  2,801  138      2,801  138 

Asset-backed securities

  5,713  701  807  21  6,520  722 

Other debt securities

             
              

Total debt securities held-to-maturity

 $14,482 $2,023 $14,463 $178 $28,945 $2,201 
              

December 31, 2008

                   

Debt securities held-to-maturity

                   

Mortgage-backed securities

 $2,348 $631 $24,236 $2,484 $26,584 $3,115 

State and municipal

  2,499  253      2,499  253 

Corporate

  23    4,107  305  4,130  305 

Asset-backed securities

  9,051  381  4,164  174  13,215  555 

Other debt securities

  439    5,246  127  5,685  127 
              

Total debt securities held-to-maturity

 $14,360 $1,265 $37,753 $3,090 $52,113 $4,355 
              

        Excluded from the gross unrealized losses presented in the above table is the $8.5$8.1 billion and $8.0 billion of gross unrealized losses recorded in AOCI related to the HTM securities that were reclassified from AFS investments as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. Approximately $5.9$6.6 billion and $5.2 billion of these unrealized losses relate to securities that have been in a loss position for 12 months or longer at JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.


Table of Contents

        The following table presents the carrying value and fair value of HTM debt securities HTM by contractual maturity dates as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:

 
 June 30, 2009 December 31, 2008(1) 
In millions of dollars Carrying
value
 Fair
value
 Carrying
value
 Fair
value
 

Mortgage-backed securities

             

Due within 1 year

 $2 $2 $88 $65 

After 1 but within 5 years

  425  274  363  282 

After 5 but within 10 years

  532  365  513  413 

After 10 years(2)

  26,629  22,586  29,155  26,287 
          

Total

 $27,588 $23,227 $30,119 $27,047 
          

State and municipal

             

Due within 1 year

 $4 $3 $86 $86 

After 1 but within 5 years

  45  45  105  105 

After 5 but within 10 years

  1,463  1,300  112  106 

After 10 years(2)

  1,611  1,455  2,885  2,652 
          

Total

 $3,123 $2,803 $3,188 $2,949 
          

All other(3)

             

Due within 1 year

 $6,689 $7,213 $4,482 $4,505 

After 1 but within 5 years

  7,557  7,502  10,892  10,692 

After 5 but within 10 years

  10,304  9,639  6,358  6,241 

After 10 years(2)

  4,361  4,041  9,420  8,943 
          

Total

 $28,911 $28,395 $31,152 $30,381 
          

Total debt securities held-to-maturity

 $59,622 $54,425 $64,459 $60,377 
          

 
 September 30, 2009 December 31, 2008 
In millions of dollars Carrying
value
 Fair
value
 Carrying
value
 Fair
value
 

Mortgage-backed securities

             

Due within 1 year

 $1 $1 $88 $65 

After 1 but within 5 years

  479  314  363  282 

After 5 but within 10 years

  1,922  1,787  513  413 

After 10 years(1)

  24,169  24,147  29,155  26,287 
          

Total

 $26,571 $26,249 $30,119 $27,047 
          

State and municipal

             

Due within 1 year

 $6 $6 $86 $86 

After 1 but within 5 years

  48  81  105  105 

After 5 but within 10 years

  168  140  112  106 

After 10 years(2)

  2,801  2,858  2,885  2,652 
          

Total

 $3,023 $3,085 $3,188 $2,949 
          

All other(2)

             

Due within 1 year

 $5,618 $5,888 $4,482 $4,505 

After 1 but within 5 years

  5,636  5,587  10,892  10,692 

After 5 but within 10 years

  6,852  7,087  6,358  6,241 

After 10 years(1)

  8,116  7,707  9,420  8,943 
          

Total

 $26,222 $26,269 $31,152 $30,381 
          

Total debt securities held-to-maturity

 $55,816 $55,603 $64,459 $60,377 
          

(1)
Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.

(2)
Investments with no stated maturities are included as contractual maturities of greater than 10 years. Actual maturities may differ due to call or prepayment rights.

(3)(2)
Includes asset-backed securities and all other debt securities.

Table of Contents

Evaluating Investments for Other-than-Temporary Impairments

        The Company conducts and documents periodic reviews of all securities with unrealized losses to evaluate whether the impairment is other than temporary. Prior to January 1, 2009, these reviews were conducted pursuant to FASB Staff Position No. FAS 115-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and its Application to Certain Investments (FSP FAS 115-1/ASC(ASC 320-10-35). Any unrealized loss identified as other than temporary was recorded directly in the Consolidated Statement of Income. As of January 1, 2009, the Company adopted FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 (ASC 320-10-65-1). Accordingly, any credit-related impairment related to debt securities the Company does not plan to sell and is not likely to be required to sell is recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income, with the non-credit-related impairment recognized in OCI. For other impaired debt securities, the entire impairment is recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

        An unrealized loss exists when the current fair value of an individual security is less than its amortized cost basis. Unrealized losses that are determined to be temporary in nature are recorded, net of tax, in AOCI for AFS securities, while such losses related to HTM securities are not recorded, as these investments are carried at their amortized cost. For securities transferred to HTM fromTrading account assets, amortized cost is defined as the fair value amount of the securities at the date of transfer, plus any accretion income and less any impairment recognized in earnings subsequent to transfer. For securities transferred to HTM from AFS, amortized cost is defined as the original purchase cost, plus or minus any accretion or amortization of a purchase discount or premium, less any impairment recognized in earnings subsequent to transfer.

        Regardless of the classification of the securities as AFS or HTM, the Company has assessed each position for credit impairment.

        Factors considered in determining whether a loss is temporary include:

    the length of time and the extent to which fair value has been below cost;

    the severity of the impairment;

    the cause of the impairment and the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer;

    activity in the market of the issuer which may indicate adverse credit conditions; and

    the Company's ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery.

        The Company's review for impairment generally entails:

    identification and evaluation of investments that have indications of possible impairment;

    analysis of individual investments that have fair values less than amortized cost, including consideration of the length of time the investment has been in an unrealized loss position and the expected recovery period;

    discussion of evidential matter, including an evaluation of factors or triggers that could cause individual investments to qualify as having other-than-temporary impairment and those that would not support other-than-temporary impairment; and

    documentation of the results of these analyses, as required under business policies.

        For equity securities, management considers the various factors described above, including its intent and ability to hold the equity security for a period of time sufficient for recovery to amortized cost. Where management lacks that intent or ability, the security's decline in fair value is deemed to be other than temporary and is recorded in earnings.

        For debt securities that are not deemed to be credit impaired, management performs additional analysis to assess whether it intends to sell or more-likely-than-not would more-likely-than-not not be required to sell the investment before the expected recovery of the amortized cost basis. In most cases, management has asserted that it has no intent to sell and that it believes it is more-likely-than-not that it will not be required to sell the investment before recovery of its amortized cost basis. Where such an assertion has not been made, the security's decline in fair value is deemed to be other than temporary and is recorded in earnings.

        For debt securities, a critical component of the evaluation for other-than-temporary impairments is the identification of credit impaired securities, where management does not expect to receive cash flows sufficient to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security. For securities purchased and classified as AFS with the expectation of receiving full principal and interest cash flows, this analysis considers the likelihood of receiving all contractual principal and interest. For securities reclassified out of the trading category in the fourth quarter of 2008, the analysis consideredconsiders the likelihood of receiving the expected principal and interest cash flows anticipated as of the date of reclassification in the fourth quarter of 2008. The extent of the Company's analysis regarding credit quality and the stress on assumptions used in the analysis have been refined for securities where the current fair value or other characteristics of the security warrant. The paragraphs below describe the Company's process for identifying credit impairment in security types with the most significant unrealized losses as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009.

        AFS equity securities deemed other-than-temporarily impaired are written down to fair value, with the full difference between fair value and amortized cost recognized in earnings.

Mortgage-Backed Securities

        For U.S. mortgage-backed securities (and in particular for Alt-A and other mortgage-backed securities that have significant unrealized losses as a percentage of amortized cost), credit impairment is assessed using a cash flow model that estimates the cash flows on the underlying mortgages, using the security-specific collateral and transaction structure. The model estimates cash flows from the underlying mortgage loans and distributes those cash flows to various tranches of securities, considering the transaction structure and any subordination and credit enhancements that exist in that structure. The cash flow model incorporates actual cash flows on the mortgage-backed securities through the current period and then projects the remaining cash flows using a number of assumptions, including default rates, prepayment rates, and recovery rates (on foreclosed properties).


Table of Contents

        Management develops specific assumptions using as much market data as possible and includes internal estimates


Table of Contents

as well as estimates published by rating agencies and other third-party sources. Default rates are projected by considering current underlying mortgage loan performance, generally assuming the default of (1) 10% of current loans, (2) 25% of 30-59 day delinquent loans, (3) 75% of 60-90 day delinquent loans and (4) 100% of 91+ day delinquent loans. These estimates are extrapolated along a default timing curve to estimate the total lifetime pool default rate. Other assumptions used contemplate the actual collateral attributes, including geographic concentrations, rating agency loss projections, rating actions and current market prices.

        The key base assumptions for mortgage-backed securities as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 are in the table below:

 
 JuneSeptember 30, 2009 

Prepayment rate

  3-8 CRR 

Loss severity(1)

  45%-75%

Unemployment rate

 ��10%

Peak-to-trough housing price decline

  32.3%
    

(1)
Loss severity rates are estimated considering collateral characteristics and generally range from 45%-55%-60% for prime bonds, 50%-65%-70% for Alt-A bonds, and 65%-75% for sub-primesubprime bonds.

        In addition, cash flow projections are developed using more stressful parameters, and management assesses the results of those stress tests (including the severity of any cash shortfall indicated and the likelihood of the stress scenarioscenario's actually occurring based on the underlying pool's characteristics and performance) to assess whether management expects to recover the amortized cost basis of the security. If cash flow projections indicate that the Company does not expect to recover its amortized cost basis, the Company recognizes the estimated credit loss in earnings.

State and Municipal Securities

        Citigroup's AFS state and municipal bonds consist primarily of bonds that are financed through Tender Option Bond programs. The process for identifying credit impairment for bonds in this program is largely based on third-party credit ratings. Individual bond positions must meet minimum ratings requirements, which vary based on the sector of the bond issuer. The average portfolio rating, ignoring any insurance, is Aa3/AA-.

        Citigroup monitors the bond issuer and insurer ratings on a daily basis. In the event of a downgrade of the bond below the Aa3/AA-, the subject bond is specifically reviewed for potential shortfall in contractual principal and interest. Citigroup has not recorded any credit impairments on bonds held as part of the Tender Option Bond program.

        The remainder of Citigroup's AFS state and municipal bonds, outside of the Tender Option Bond Programs, are specifically reviewed for credit impairment based on instrument-specific estimates of cash flows, probability of default and loss given default.

Recognition and Measurement of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment

        AFS and HTM debt securities that have been identified as other-than-temporarily impaired are written down to their current fair value. For debt securities that are intended to be sold or that management believes more-likely-than-not will be required to be sold prior to recovery, the full impairment is recognized immediately in earnings.

        For AFS and HTM debt securities that management has no intent to sell and believes that it more-likely-than-not will not be required to be sold prior to recovery, only the credit loss component of the impairment is recognized in earnings, while the rest of the fair value loss is recognized in OCI. The credit loss component recognized in earnings is identified as the amount of principal cash flows not expected to be received over the remaining term of the security as projected using the Company's cash flow projections using its base assumptions.

        AFS equity securities deemed other-than-temporarily impaired are written down to fair value, with the full difference between fair value and amortized cost recognized in earnings.


Table of Contents

Recognition and Measurement of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment

        The following table presents the total other-than-temporary impairments recognized during the three months and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009:

Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (OTTI) on Investments

 
 Three months ended June 30, 2009 Six months ended June 30, 2009 
In millions of dollars AFS HTM Total AFS HTM Total 
Impairment losses related to securities which the Company does not intend to sell nor will likely be required to sell:                   
 Total OTTI losses recognized during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 $50 $2,263 $2,313 $105 $3,548 $3,653 
 Less: portion of OTTI loss recognized in OCI (before taxes)  15  1,619  1,634  29  2,236  2,265 
              
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings for securities that the Company does not intend to sell nor will likely be required to sell $35 $644 $679 $76 $1,312 $1,388 
OTTI losses recognized in earnings for securities that the Company intends to sell or more-likely-than-not will be required to sell before recovery  16    16  55    55 
              
Total impairment losses recognized in earnings $51 $644 $695 $131 $1,312 $1,443 
              

 
 Three months ended Sept. 30, 2009 Nine months ended Sept. 30, 2009 
In millions of dollars AFS HTM Total AFS HTM Total 

Impairment losses related to securities which the Company does not intend to sell nor will likely be required to sell:

                   
 

Total OTTI losses recognized during the quarter ended September 30, 2009

 $158 $2,182 $2,340 $263 $5,730 $5,993 
 

Less: portion of OTTI loss recognized in OCI (before taxes)

  25  1,716  1,741  54  3,952  4,006 
              

Net impairment losses recognized in earnings for securities that the Company does not intend to sell nor will likely be required to sell

 $133 $466 $599 $209 $1,778 $1,987 

OTTI losses recognized in earnings for securities that the Company intends to sell or more-likely-than-not will be required to sell before recovery

  113    113  168    168 
              

Total impairment losses recognized in earnings

 $246 $466 $712 $377 $1,778 $2,155 
              

        The following is a three-month roll forward of the credit-related position recognized in earnings for AFS and HTM debt securities held as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009:

 
 Cumulative Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Credit Losses Recognized in Earnings 
In millions of dollars March 31, 2009
Balance
 Credit impairments
recognized in
earnings on
securities not
previously impaired
 Credit impairments
recognized in
earnings on
securities than
have been
previously impaired
 Reductions due
to sales of credit
impaired
securities sold
or matured
 June 30, 2009
Balance
 
AFS debt securities                
Mortgage-backed securities                
 Prime $ $7 $ $ $7 
 Commercial real estate  2        2 
            
 Total mortgage-backed securities  2  7      9 
Foreign government    14      14 
Corporate  84  8  5    97 
Asset backed securities  2  1      3 
Other debt securities  6        6 
            
Total OTTI credit losses recognized for AFS debt securities $94 $30 $5 $ $129 
            
HTM debt securities                
Mortgage-backed securities                
 Prime $8 $6 $ $ $14 
 Alt-A  1,505  396      1,901 
 Subprime  95  10      105 
 Non-U.S. residential  34  62      96 
 Commercial real estate  4        4 
            
 Total mortgage-backed securities  1,646  474      2,120 
Corporate  221  169    (70) 320 
Asset backed securities  32        32 
Other debt securities  2  1      3 
            
Total OTTI credit losses recognized for HTM debt securities $1,901 $644 $ $(70)$2,475 
            

 
 Cumulative Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Credit Losses Recognized in Earnings 
In millions of dollars June 30, 2009
Balance
 Credit impairments
recognized in
earnings on
securities not
previously impaired
 Credit impairments
recognized in
earnings on
securities than
have been
previously impaired
 Reductions due
to sales of credit
impaired
securities sold
or matured
 Sept. 30, 2009
Balance
 

AFS debt securities

                

Mortgage-backed securities

                
 

Prime

 $7 $92 $ $ $99 
 

Commercial real estate

  2        2 
            
 

Total mortgage-backed securities

  9  92      101 

Foreign government

  14      (1) 13 

Corporate

  97  24  10    131 

Asset backed securities

  3    5    8 

Other debt securities

  6  2      8 
            

Total OTTI credit losses recognized for AFS debt securities

 $129 $118 $15 $(1)$261 
            

HTM debt securities

                

Mortgage-backed securities

                
 

Prime

 $14 $93 $1 $ $108 
 

Alt-A

  1,901  297      2,198 
 

Subprime

  105  66      171 
 

Non-U.S. residential

  96        96 
 

Commercial real estate

  4        4 
            
 

Total mortgage-backed securities

  2,120  456  1    2,577 

Corporate

  320  8    (3) 325 

Asset backed securities

  32        32 

Other debt securities

  3    1    4 
            

Total OTTI credit losses recognized for HTM debt securities

 $2,475 $464 $2 $(3)$2,938 
            

Table of Contents

        The following is a six-monthnine-month roll forward of the credit-related position recognized in earnings for AFS and HTM debt securities held as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009:

 
 Cumulative Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Credit Losses Recognized in Earnings 
In millions of dollars January 1, 2009
Balance
 Credit impairments
recognized in
earnings on
securities not
previously impaired
 Credit impairments
recognized in
earnings on
securities than
have been
previously impaired
 Reductions due
to sales of credit
impaired
securities sold
or matured
 June 30, 2009
Balance
 
AFS debt securities                
Mortgage-backed securities                
 Prime $ $7 $ $ $7 
 Commercial real estate  1  1      2 
            
 Total mortgage-backed securities  1  8      9 
Foreign government    14      14 
Corporate  53  30  15  (1) 97 
Asset backed securities    3      3 
Other debt securities    6      6 
            
Total OTTI credit losses recognized for AFS debt securities $54 $61 $15 $(1)$129 
            
HTM debt securities                
Mortgage-backed securities                
 Prime $8 $6 $ $ $14 
 Alt-A  1,091  791  19    1,901 
 Subprime  85  20      105 
 Non- U.S. residential  28  68      96 
 Commercial real estate  4        4 
            
 Total mortgage-backed securities  1,216  885  19    2,120 
Corporate    390    (70) 320 
Asset backed securities  17  15      32 
Other debt securities    3      3 
            
Total OTTI credit losses recognized for HTM debt securities $1,233 $1,293 $19 $(70)$2,475 
            

 
 Cumulative Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Credit Losses Recognized in Earnings 
In millions of dollars January 1, 2009
Balance
 Credit impairments
recognized in
earnings on
securities not
previously impaired
 Credit impairments
recognized in
earnings on
securities than
have been
previously
impaired
 Reductions due
to sales of credit
impaired
securities sold
or matured
 Sept. 30, 2009
Balance
 
AFS debt securities                
Mortgage-backed securities                
 Prime $ $99 $ $ $99 
 Commercial real estate  1  1      2 
            
 Total mortgage-backed securities  1  100      101 
Foreign government    14    (1) 13 
Corporate  53  54  25  (1) 131 
Asset backed securities    3  5    8 
Other debt securities    8      6 
            
Total OTTI credit losses recognized for AFS debt
    securities
 $54 $179 $30 $(2)$261 
            
HTM debt securities                
Mortgage-backed securities                
 Prime $8 $99 $1 $ $108 
 Alt-A  1,091  1,088  19    2,198 
 Subprime  85  86      171 
 Non- U.S. residential  28  68      96 
 Commercial real estate  4        4 
            
 Total mortgage-backed securities  1,216  1,341  20    2,577 
Corporate    398    (73) 325 
Asset backed securities  17  15      32 
Other debt securities    3  1    4 
            
Total OTTI credit losses recognized for HTM debt
    securities
 $1,233 $1,757 $21 $(73)$2,938 
            

Table of Contents

11.   GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Goodwill

        The changes in goodwill during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 were as follows:

In millions of dollars Goodwill 
Balance at December 31, 2008 $27,132 
Foreign exchange translation  (844)
Purchase accounting adjustments and other  122 
    
Balance at March 31, 2009 $26,410 
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney joint venture  (1,146)
Estimated impact from the Sale of Nikko Cordial Securities, reclassified asAssets of discontinued operations held for sale  (533)
Foreign exchange translation  847 
    
Balance at June 30, 2009 $25,578 
    

Identification of New Reporting Units

        The changes in the organizational structure resulted in the creation of new reporting segments. As a result, commencing with the second quarter 2009, the Company has identified new reporting units as required under SFAS 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Goodwill affected by the reorganization has been reassigned from ten reporting units to nine, using a fair value approach. Subsequent to June 30, 2009, goodwill will be allocated to disposals and tested for impairment under the new reporting units.

In millions of dollars Goodwill 

Balance at December 31, 2008

 $27,132 

Foreign exchange translation

  (844)

Purchase accounting adjustments and other

  122 
    

Balance at March 31, 2009

 $26,410 

Morgan Stanley Smith Barney joint venture

  (1,146)

Estimated impact from the Sale of Nikko Cordial Securities, reclassified asAssets of discontinued operations held for sale

  (533)

Foreign exchange translation

  847 
    

Balance at June 30, 2009

 $25,578 

Estimated impact from the Sale of Nikko Asset Management, reclassified asOther Assets of businesses held for sale

  (446)

Foreign exchange translation

  409 

Purchase accounting adjustments and other

  (118)
    

Balance at September 30, 2009

 $25,423 
    

        During the first sixnine months of 2009, no goodwill was written off due to impairment.

        While The Company performed its annual goodwill impairment test during the third quarter of 2009 and while no impairment was noted in step one for any of the Company's reporting unit impairment test,units, goodwill for the new Latin America Regional Consumer Banking and Local Consumer Lending—Cards reporting units may be particularly sensitive to further deterioration in economic conditions. The fair value as a percentage of allocated book value for Latin America Regional Consumer Banking and Local Consumer Lending—Cards is 111% and 112%, respectively. If the future were to differ adversely from management's best estimate of key economic assumptions and associated cash flows were to decrease by a small margin, the Company could potentially experience future material impairment charges with respect to the $1,265$1,317 million and $4,781$4,751 million of goodwill remaining in our Latin America Regional Consumer Banking and Local Consumer Lending—Cards reporting units, respectively. Any such charges, by themselves, would not negatively affect the Company's Tier 1, Tier 1 Common and Total Capital regulatory ratios, its Tangible Common Equity or the Company's liquidity position.

        The following tables present the Company's goodwill balances by reporting unit and by segment at JuneSeptember 30, 2009:

In millions of dollars June 30, 2009 
By Reporting Unit    
North America Regional Consumer Banking $2,406 
EMEA Regional Consumer Banking  306 
Asia Regional Consumer Banking  5,392 
Latin America Regional Consumer Banking  1,265 
Securities and Banking  8,516 
Transaction Services  1,561 
Brokerage and Asset Management  1,299 
Local Consumer Lending—Cards  4,781 
Local Consumer Lending—Other  52 
    
 Total $25,578 
    
By Segment    
Regional Consumer Banking $9,370 
Institutional Clients Group  10,077 
Citi Holdings  6,131 
    
 Total $25,578 
    

In millions of dollars September 30, 2009 

By Reporting Unit

    

North America Regional Consumer Banking

 $2,461 

EMEA Regional Consumer Banking

  342 

Asia Regional Consumer Banking

  5,375 

Latin America Regional Consumer Banking

  1,317 

Securities and Banking

  8,767 

Transaction Services

  1,579 

Brokerage and Asset Management

  831 

Local Consumer Lending—Cards

  4,751 

Local Consumer Lending—Other

   
    
 

Total

 $25,423 
    

By Segment

    

Regional Consumer Banking

 $9,495 

Institutional Clients Group

  10,346 

Citi Holdings

  5,582 
    
 

Total

 $25,423 
    

Table of Contents

Intangible Assets

        The components of intangible assets were as follows:

 
 June 30, 2009 December 31, 2008 
In millions of dollars Gross
carrying
amount
 Accumulated
amortization
 Net
carrying
amount
 Gross
carrying
amount
 Accumulated
amortization
 Net
carrying
amount
 
Purchased credit card relationships $8,418 $4,748 $3,670 $8,443 $4,513 $3,930 
Core deposit intangibles  1,359  722  637  1,345  662  683 
Other customer relationships  707  162  545  4,031  168  3,863 
Present value of future profits  417  272  145  415  264  151 
Other(1)  5,018  1,311  3,707  5,343  1,285  4,058 
              
Total amortizing intangible assets $15,919 $7,215 $8,704 $19,577 $6,892 $12,685 
Indefinite-lived intangible assets  1,394  N/A  1,394  1,474  N/A  1,474 
Mortgage servicing rights  6,770  N/A  6,770  5,657  N/A  5,657 
              
Total intangible assets $24,083 $7,215 $16,868 $26,708 $6,892 $19,816 
              

 
 September 30, 2009 December 31, 2008 
In millions of dollars Gross
carrying
amount
 Accumulated
amortization
 Net
carrying
amount
 Gross
carrying
amount
 Accumulated
amortization
 Net
carrying
amount
 

Purchased credit card relationships

 $8,138 $4,684 $3,454 $8,443 $4,513 $3,930 

Core deposit intangibles

  1,351  744  607  1,345  662  683 

Other customer relationships

  696  170  526  4,031  168  3,863 

Present value of future profits

  416  275  141  415  264  151 

Other(1)

  4,965  1,292  3,673  5,343  1,285  4,058 
              

Total amortizing intangible assets

 $15,566 $7,165 $8,401 $19,577 $6,892 $12,685 

Indefinite-lived intangible assets

  556  N/A  556  1,474  N/A  1,474 

Mortgage servicing rights

  6,228  N/A  6,228  5,657  N/A  5,657 
              

Total intangible assets

 $22,350 $7,165 $15,185 $26,708 $6,892 $19,816 
              

(1)
Includes contract-related intangible assets.

N/A    Not Applicable.


Table of Contents

        The changes in intangible assets during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 were as follows:

In millions of dollars Net carrying
amount at
December 31,
2008
 Acquisitions /
Divestitures
 Amortization Impairments FX and
other(1)
 Net carrying
amount at
June 30,
2009
 
Purchased credit card relationships $3,930 $ $(287)$ $27 $3,670 
Core deposit intangibles  683    (58) (3) 15  637 
Other customer relationships(2)  3,863  (3,016) (116)   (186) 545 
Present value of future profits  151    (7)   1  145 
Indefinite-lived intangible assets  1,474  (69)     (11) 1,394 
Other  4,058  (155) (149) (46) (1) 3,707 
              
  $14,159 $(3,240)$(617)$(49)$(155)$10,098 
              
Mortgage servicing rights(3)  5,657              6,770 
                  
Total intangible assets $19,816             $16,868 
                  

In millions of dollars Net carrying
amount at
December 31,
2008
 Acquisitions /
Divestitures
 Amortization Impairments FX and
other(1)
 Net carrying
amount at
September 30,
2009
 

Purchased credit card relationships

 $3,930 $(72)$(444)$ $40 $3,454 

Core deposit intangibles

  683    (86) (3) 13  607 

Other customer relationships(2)

  3,863  (3,253) (145)   61  526 

Present value of future profits

  151    (10)     141 

Indefinite-lived intangible assets(2)

  1,474  (967)     49  556 

Other

  4,058  (133) (222) (53) 23  3,673 
              

 $14,159 $(4,425)$(907)$(56)$186 $8,957 
              

Mortgage servicing rights(3)

  5,657              6,228 
                  

Total intangible assets

 $19,816             $15,185 
                  

(1)
Includes the impact of FX translation and purchase accounting adjustments.

(2)
Decrease during the secondthird quarter of 2009 is due to the reclassification of assets of the Nikko Cordial businessesasset management business toOther Assets of discontinued operations held for sale as described in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(3)
See Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the roll-forward of mortgage servicing rights.

Table of Contents


12.    DEBT

Short-Term Borrowings

        Short-term borrowings consist of commercial paper and other borrowings as follows:

In millions of dollars June 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 
Commercial paper       
Citigroup Funding Inc.  $27,862 $28,654 
Other Citigroup subsidiaries  633  471 
      
  $28,495 $29,125 
Other short-term borrowings  73,399  97,566 
      
Total short-term borrowings $101,894 $126,691 
      

In millions of dollars September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

Commercial paper

       

Citigroup Funding Inc. 

 $9,983 $28,654 

Other Citigroup subsidiaries

  433  471 
      

 $10,416 $29,125 

Other short-term borrowings

  54,315  97,566 
      

Total short-term borrowings

 $64,731 $126,691 
      

        Borrowings under bank lines of credit may be at interest rates based on LIBOR, CD rates, the prime rate, or bids submitted by the banks. Citigroup pays commitment fees for its lines of credit.

        Some of Citigroup's non-bank subsidiaries have credit facilities with Citigroup's subsidiary depository institutions, including Citibank, N.A. Borrowings under these facilities must be secured in accordance with Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act.

        Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. (CGMHI) has committed financing with unaffiliated banks. At JuneSeptember 30, 2009, CGMHI had drawn down the full $1.175 billion available under these facilities, of which $725 million is guaranteed by Citigroup. CGMHI has a bilateral facilitiesfacility totaling $500$400 million with an unaffiliated banks with maturities occurring on various dates in the second half of 2009.bank maturing prior to year end. It also has substantial borrowing agreements consisting of facilities that CGMHI has been advised are available, but where no contractual lending obligation exists. These arrangements are reviewed on an ongoing basis to ensure flexibility in meeting CGMHI's short-term requirements.

Long-Term Debt

In millions of dollars June 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 
Citigroup parent company $192,295 $192,290 
Other Citigroup subsidiaries(1)  96,497  109,306 
Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. (CGMHI)  15,134  20,623 
Citigroup Funding Inc. (CFI)(2)  44,120  37,374 
      
Total long term debt $348,046 $359,593 
      

In millions of dollars September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

Citigroup parent company

 $214,981 $192,290 

Other Citigroup subsidiaries(1)

  97,965  109,306 

Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. (CGMHI)

  15,403  20,623 

Citigroup Funding Inc. (CFI)(2)

  51,208  37,374 
      

Total long term debt

 $379,557 $359,593 
      

(1)
At JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, collateralized advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank are $38.5$30.6 billion and $67.4 billion, respectively.

(2)
Includes Principal-Protected Trust Securities (Safety First Trust Securities) with carrying values of $494$521 million issued by Safety First Trust Series 2006-1, 2007-1, 2007-2, 2007-3, 2007-4, 2008-1, 2008-2, 2008-3, 2008-4, 2008-5, 2008-6, 2009-1, 2009-2, and 2009-3 (collectively, the "Safety First Trusts") at JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and $452 million issued by Safety First Trust Series 2006-1, 2007-1, 2007-2, 2007-3, 2007-4, 2008-1, 2008-2, 2008-3, 2008-4, 2008-5 and 2008-6 at December 31, 2008. CFI owns all of the voting securities of the Safety First Trusts. The Safety First Trusts have no assets, operations, revenues or cash flows other than those related to the issuance, administration, and repayment of the Safety First Trust Securities and the Safety First Trusts' common securities. The Safety First Trusts' obligations under the Safety First Trust Securities are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by CFI, and CFI's guarantee obligations are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Citigroup.

        CGMHI has a syndicated five-year committed uncollateralized revolving line of credit facility with unaffiliated banks totaling $3.0 billion, which was undrawn at JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and matures in 2011. CGMHI also has committed long-term financing facilities with unaffiliated banks. At JuneSeptember 30, 2009, CGMHI had drawn down the full $900 million available under these facilities, of which $350$150 million is guaranteed by Citigroup. Generally, a bank can terminate these facilities by giving CGMHI one-year prior notice.

        The Company issues both fixed and variable rate debt in a range of currencies. It uses derivative contracts, primarily interest rate swaps, to effectively convert a portion of its fixed rate debt to variable rate debt and variable rate debt to fixed rate debt. The maturity structure of the derivatives generally corresponds to the maturity structure of the debt being hedged. In addition, the Company uses other derivative contracts to manage the impact of FX translation certain debt issuances.

        Citigroup and other U.S. financial services firms are currently benefiting from government programs that are improving markets and providing Citigroup and other institutions with significant current funding capacity and significant liquidity support, including the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (TLGP). See "TARP and Other Regulatory Programs" above.

        Long-term debt at JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 includes $24.2$34.5 billion and $24.1 billion, respectively, of junior subordinated debt. The Company formed statutory business trusts under the laws of the state of Delaware. The trusts exist for the exclusive purposes of (1) issuing trust securities representing undivided beneficial interests in the assets of the trust; (2) investing the gross proceeds of the trust securities in junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (subordinated debentures) of its parent; and (3) engaging in only those activities necessary or incidental thereto. Upon approval from the Federal Reserve Board, Citigroup has the right to redeem these securities.

        Citigroup has contractually agreed not to redeem or purchase (i) the 6.50% Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities of Citigroup Capital XV before September 15, 2056, (ii) the 6.45% Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities of Citigroup


Table of Contents

Capital XVI before December 31, 2046, (iii) the 6.35% Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities of Citigroup Capital XVII before March 15, 2057, (iv) the 6.829% Fixed Rate/Floating Rate Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities of Citigroup Capital XVIII before June 28, 2047, (v) the 7.250% Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities of Citigroup Capital XIX before August 15, 2047, (vi) the 7.875% Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities of Citigroup Capital XX before December 15, 2067, and (vii) the 8.300% Fixed Rate/Floating Rate Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities of Citigroup Capital XXI before December 21, 2067, unless certain conditions, described in Exhibit 4.03 to Citigroup's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 18, 2006, in Exhibit 4.02 to Citigroup's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 28, 2006, in Exhibit 4.02 to Citigroup's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 8, 2007, in Exhibit 4.02 to Citigroup's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 2, 2007, in Exhibit 4.02 to Citigroup's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 17, 2007, in Exhibit 4.2 to Citigroup's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 27, 2007, and in Exhibit 4.2 to Citigroup's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 21, 2007, respectively, are met. These agreements are for the benefit of the holders of Citigroup's 6.00% Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures due 2034. In addition, see Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Exchange Offers," below.

        Citigroup owns all of the voting securities of these subsidiary trusts. These subsidiary trusts have no assets, operations, revenues or cash flows other than those related to the issuance, administration, and repayment of the subsidiary trusts and the subsidiary trusts' common securities. These subsidiary trusts' obligations are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Citigroup.


Table of Contents

        The following table summarizes the financial structure of each of the Company's subsidiary trusts at JuneSeptember 30, 2009:

 
  
  
  
  
  
 Junior subordinated debentures
owned by trust
 
Trust securities with distributions
guaranteed by Citigroup
In millions of dollars, except share amounts
 Issuance
date
 Securities
issued
 Liquidation
value
 Coupon
rate
 Common
shares issued
to parent
 Amount(1) Maturity Redeemable
by issuer
beginning
 
Citigroup Capital III  Dec. 1996  200,000 $200  7.625% 6,186 $206  Dec. 1, 2036  Not redeemable 
Citigroup Capital VII  July 2001  46,000,000  1,150  7.125% 1,422,681  1,186  July 31, 2031  July 31, 2006 
Citigroup Capital VIII  Sept. 2001  56,000,000  1,400  6.950% 1,731,959  1,443  Sept. 15, 2031  Sept. 17, 2006 
Citigroup Capital IX  Feb. 2003  44,000,000  1,100  6.000% 1,360,825  1,134  Feb. 14, 2033  Feb. 13, 2008 
Citigroup Capital X  Sept. 2003  20,000,000  500  6.100% 618,557  515  Sept. 30, 2033  Sept. 30, 2008 
Citigroup Capital XI  Sept. 2004  24,000,000  600  6.000% 742,269  619  Sept. 27, 2034  Sept. 27, 2009 
Citigroup Capital XIV  June 2006  22,600,000  565  6.875% 40,000  566  June 30, 2066  June 30, 2011 
Citigroup Capital XV  Sept. 2006  47,400,000  1,185  6.500% 40,000  1,186  Sept. 15, 2066  Sept. 15, 2011 
Citigroup Capital XVI  Nov. 2006  64,000,000  1,600  6.450% 20,000  1,601  Dec. 31, 2066  Dec. 31, 2011 
Citigroup Capital XVII  Mar. 2007  44,000,000  1,100  6.350% 20,000  1,101  Mar. 15, 2067  Mar. 15, 2012 
Citigroup Capital XVIII  June 2007  500,000  824  6.829% 50  824  June 28, 2067  June 28, 2017 
Citigroup Capital XIX  Aug. 2007  49,000,000  1,225  7.250% 20  1,226  Aug. 15, 2067  Aug. 15, 2012 
Citigroup Capital XX  Nov. 2007  31,500,000  788  7.875% 20,000  788  Dec. 15, 2067  Dec. 15, 2012 
Citigroup Capital XXI  Dec. 2007  3,500,000  3,500  8.300% 500  3,501  Dec. 21, 2077  Dec. 21, 2037 
Citigroup Capital XXIX  Nov. 2007  1,875,000  1,875  6.320% 10  1,875  Mar. 15, 2041  Mar. 15, 2013 
Citigroup Capital XXX  Nov. 2007  1,875,000  1,875  6.455% 10  1,875  Sept. 15, 2041  Sept. 15, 2013 
Citigroup Capital XXXI  Nov. 2007  1,875,000  1,875  6.700% 10  1,875  Mar. 15, 2042  Mar. 15, 2014 
Citigroup Capital XXXII  Nov. 2007  1,875,000  1,875  6.935% 10  1,875  Sept. 15, 2042  Sept. 15, 2014 
Adam Capital Trust III  Dec. 2002  17,500  18  3 mo. LIB
+335 bp.
  542  18  Jan. 07, 2033  Jan. 07, 2008 
Adam Statutory Trust III  Dec. 2002  25,000  25  3 mo. LIB
+325 bp.
  774  26  Dec. 26, 2032  Dec. 26, 2007 
Adam Statutory Trust IV  Sept. 2003  40,000  40  3 mo. LIB
+295 bp.
  1,238  41  Sept. 17, 2033  Sept. 17, 2008 
Adam Statutory Trust V  Mar. 2004  35,000  35  3 mo. LIB
+279 bp.
  1,083  36  Mar. 17, 2034  Mar. 17, 2009 
                        
Total obligated       $23,355       $23,517       
                        

 
  
  
  
  
  
 Junior subordinated debentures
owned by trust
 
Trust securities with distributions
guaranteed by Citigroup
In millions of dollars, except share amounts
 Issuance
date
 Securities
issued
 Liquidation
value
 Coupon
rate
 Common
shares issued
to parent
 Amount(1) Maturity Redeemable
by issuer
beginning
 
Citigroup Capital III  Dec. 1996  194,053 $194  7.625% 6,003 $200  Dec. 1, 2036  Not redeemable 
Citigroup Capital VII  July 2001  35,885,898  897  7.125% 1,109,874  925  July 31, 2031  July 31, 2006 
Citigroup Capital VIII  Sept. 2001  43,651,597  1,091  6.950% 1,350,050  1,125  Sept. 15, 2031  Sept. 17, 2006 
Citigroup Capital IX  Feb. 2003  33,874,813  847  6.000% 1,047,675  873  Feb. 14, 2033  Feb. 13, 2008 
Citigroup Capital X  Sept. 2003  14,757,823  369  6.100% 456,428  380  Sept. 30, 2033  Sept. 30, 2008 
Citigroup Capital XI  Sept. 2004  18,387,128  460  6.000% 568,675  474  Sept. 27, 2034  Sept. 27, 2009 
Citigroup Capital XIV  June 2006  12,227,281  306  6.875% 40,000  307  June 30, 2066  June 30, 2011 
Citigroup Capital XV  Sept. 2006  25,210,733  630  6.500% 40,000  631  Sept. 15, 2066  Sept. 15, 2011 
Citigroup Capital XVI  Nov. 2006  38,148,947  954  6.450% 20,000  954  Dec. 31, 2066  Dec. 31, 2011 
Citigroup Capital XVII  Mar. 2007  28,047,927  701  6.350% 20,000  702  Mar. 15, 2067  Mar. 15, 2012 
Citigroup Capital XVIII  June 2007  99,901  160  6.829% 50  160  June 28, 2067  June 28, 2017 
Citigroup Capital XIX  Aug. 2007  22,771,968  569  7.250% 20,000  570  Aug. 15, 2067  Aug. 15, 2012 
Citigroup Capital XX  Nov. 2007  17,709,814  443  7.875% 20,000  443  Dec. 15, 2067  Dec. 15, 2012 
Citigroup Capital XXI  Dec. 2007  2,345,801  2,346  8.300% 500  2,346  Dec. 21, 2077  Dec. 21, 2037 
Citigroup Capital XXIX  Nov. 2007  1,875,000  1,875  6.320% 10  1,875  Mar. 15, 2041  Mar. 15, 2013 
Citigroup Capital XXX  Nov. 2007  1,875,000  1,875  6.455% 10  1,875  Sept. 15, 2041  Sept. 15, 2013 
Citigroup Capital XXXI  Nov. 2007  1,875,000  1,875  6.700% 10  1,875  Mar. 15, 2042  Mar. 15, 2014 
Citigroup Capital XXXII  Nov. 2007  1,875,000  1,875  6.935% 10  1,875  Sept. 15, 2042  Sept. 15, 2014 
Citigroup Capital XXXIII  July 2009  27,059,000  27,059  8.000% 100  27,059  July 30, 2039  July 30, 2014 
Adam Capital Trust III  Dec. 2002  17,500  18  3 mo. LIB
+335 bp.
  542  18  Jan. 7, 2033  Jan. 7, 2008 
Adam Statutory Trust III  Dec. 2002  25,000  25  3 mo. LIB
+325 bp.
  774  26  Dec. 26, 2032  Dec. 26, 2007 
Adam Statutory Trust IV  Sept. 2003  40,000  40  3 mo. LIB
+295 bp.
  1,238  41  Sept. 17, 2033  Sept. 17, 2008 
Adam Statutory Trust V  Mar. 2004  35,000  35  3 mo. LIB
+279 bp.
  1,083  36  Mar. 17, 2034  Mar. 17, 2009 
                        
Total obligated       $44,644       $44,770       
                        

(1)
Represents the proceeds received from the trust at the date of issuance.

        In each case, the coupon rate on the debentures is the same as that on the trust securities. Distributions on the trust securities and interest on the debentures are payable quarterly, except for Citigroup Capital III, Citigroup Capital XVIII and Citigroup Capital XXI on which distributions are payable semiannually.

During the secondthird quarter of 2009, pursuant to the "Exchange Offers", Citigroup did not issue anyconverted $5.8 billion liquidation value of trust preferred securities. In addition, see Note 23securities across Citigroup Capital III, Citigroup Capital VII, Citigroup Capital VIII, Citigroup Capital IX, Citigroup Capital X, Citigroup Capital XI, Citigroup Capital XIV, Citigroup Capital XV, Citigroup Capital XVI, Citigroup Capital XVII, Citigroup Capital XVIII, Citigroup Capital XIX, Citigroup Capital XX and Citigroup Capital XXI to common stock and issued $27.1 billion of Citigroup Capital XXXIII trust preferred securities to the Consolidated Financial Statements,"Exchange Offers," below.USG in exchange for the Series G and I of preferred stock.


Table of Contents


13.    PREFERRED STOCK

        The following table summarizes the Company's preferred stock outstanding at September 30, 2009, June 30, 2009, and December 31, 2008:

 
  
  
  
  
 Carrying value
(in millions of dollars)
 
 
  
  
  
 Convertible to
approximate
number of
Citigroup common
shares
 
 
  
 Redemption
price per
depositary share /
preference share
  
 
 
 Dividend rate Number
of depositary shares
 June 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

Series A1(1)

  7.000%$50  137,600,000  261,083,726 $6,880 $6,880 

Series B1(1)

  7.000% 50  60,000,000  113,844,648  3,000  3,000 

Series C1(1)

  7.000% 50  20,000,000  37,948,216  1,000  1,000 

Series D1(1)

  7.000% 50  15,000,000  28,461,162  750  750 

Series E(2)

  8.400% 1,000  6,000,000    6,000  6,000 

Series F(3)

  8.500% 25  81,600,000    2,040  2,040 

Series G(4)

  8.000% 1,000,000  7,059    3,529   

Series H(5)

  5.000% 1,000,000  25,000    23,835  23,727 

Series I(6)

  8.000% 1,000,000  20,000    19,513  19,513 

Series J1(1)

  7.000% 50  9,000,000  17,076,698  450  450 

Series K1(1)

  7.000% 50  8,000,000  15,179,287  400  400 

Series L2(1)

  7.000% 50  100,000  189,742  5  5 

Series N1(1)

  7.000% 50  300,000  569,224  15  15 

Series T(7)

  6.500% 50  63,373,000  93,940,986  3,169  3,169 

Series AA(8)

  8.125% 25  148,600,000    3,715  3,715 
              

           568,293,689 $74,301 $70,664 
                 

 
  
  
  
 Carrying value
(in millions of dollars)
 
 
  
 Redemption
price per
depositary share /
preference share
  
 
 
 Dividend rate Number
of depositary shares
 September 30,
2009
 June 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

Series A1(1)

  7.000%$50  137,600,000 $ $6,880 $6,880 

Series B1(1)

  7.000% 50  60,000,000    3,000  3,000 

Series C1(1)

  7.000% 50  20,000,000    1,000  1,000 

Series D1(1)

  7.000% 50  15,000,000    750  750 

Series E(2)

  8.400% 1,000  6,000,000  121  6,000  6,000 

Series F(3)

  8.500% 25  81,600,000  71  2,040  2,040 

Series G(4)

  8.000% 1,000,000  7,059    3,529   

Series H(5)

  5.000% 1,000,000  25,000    23,835  23,727 

Series I(6)

  8.000% 1,000,000  20,000    19,513  19,513 

Series J1(1)

  7.000% 50  9,000,000    450  450 

Series K1(1)

  7.000% 50  8,000,000    400  400 

Series L2(1)

  7.000% 50  100,000    5  5 

Series N1(1)

  7.000% 50  300,000    15  15 

Series T(7)

  6.500% 50  63,373,000  23  3,169  3,169 

Series AA(8)

  8.125% 25  148,600,000  97  3,715  3,715 
              

          $312 $74,301 $70,664 
                 

(1)
Issued on January 23, 2008 as depositary shares, each representing a 1/1,000th interest in a share of the corresponding series of Non-Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock. Redeemable in whole or in part on or after February 15, 2015. Under the terms of pre-existing conversion price reset agreements with holders of Series A, B, C, D, J, K, L1 and N (the "Old Preferred Stock"), on February 17, 2009, Citigroup exchanged shares of new preferred stock (the "New Preferred Stock") for an equal number of shares of Old Preferred Stock. The terms and conditions of the New Preferred Stock were identical in all material respects to the terms and conditions of the Old Preferred Stock, except that the Conversion Price and Conversion Rate of the New Preferred Stock were reset to $26.3517 and 1,897.4108, respectively. All shares of the Old Preferred Stock were canceled. The dividend of $0.88 per depositary share iswas payable quarterly when, as and if declared by the Company's Board of Directors. Redemption iswas subject to a capital replacement covenant.

(2)
Issued on April 28, 2008 as depositary shares, each representing a 1/25th interest in a share of the corresponding series of Fixed Rate/Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock. Redeemable in whole or in part on or after April 30, 2018. Dividends are payable semi-annually for the first 10 years until April 30, 2018 at $42.00 per depositary share and thereafter quarterly at a floating rate when, as and if declared by the Company's Board of Directors.

(3)
Issued on May 13, 2008 and May 28, 2008 as depositary shares, each representing a 1/1,000th interest in a share of the corresponding series of Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock. Redeemable in whole or in part on or after June 15, 2013. The dividend of $0.53 per depositary share is payable quarterly when, as and if declared by the Company's Board of Directors.

(4)
Issued on January 15, 2009 as shares of Cumulative Preferred Stock to the U.S. Treasury and the FDIC as consideration for guaranteeing approximately $300.8 billion of assets. Redeemable in whole or in part subject to approval of the investor and compliance with certain conditions. The dividend of $20,000 per preferred share iswas payable quarterly when, as and if declared by the Company's Board of Directors.

(5)
Issued on October 28, 2008 as shares of Cumulative Preferred Stock to the U.S. Treasury under the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). Redeemable in whole or in part subject to approval of the investor and compliance with certain conditions. Dividends arewere payable quarterly for the first five years until February 15, 2013 at $12,500 per preferred share and thereafter at $22,500 per preferred share when, as and if declared by the Company's Board of Directors.

(6)
Issued on December 31, 2008 as shares of Cumulative Preferred Stock to the U.S. Treasury under TARP. Redeemable in whole or in part subject to approval of the investor and compliance with certain conditions. The dividend of $20,000 per preferred share iswas payable quarterly when, as and if declared by the Company's Board of Directors.

(7)
Issued on January 23, 2008 and January 29, 2008 as depositary shares, each representing a 1/1,000th interest in a share of the corresponding series of Non-Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock. Redeemable in whole or in part on or after February 15, 2015. Convertible into Citigroup common stock at a conversion rate of approximately 1,482.3503 per share, which is subject to adjustment under certain conditions. The dividend of $0.81 per depositary share is payable quarterly when, as and if declared by the Company's Board of Directors. Redemption is subject to a capital replacement covenant.

(8)
Issued on January 25, 2008 as depositary shares, each representing a 1/1,000th interest in a share of the corresponding series of Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock. Redeemable in whole or in part on or after February 15, 2018. The dividend of $0.51 per depositary share is payable quarterly when, as and if declared by the Company's Board of Directors. Redemption is subject to a capital replacement covenant.

        If dividends were to be declared on Series E as scheduled, the impact from preferred dividends on earnings per share in the first and third quarters will be lower than the impact in the second and fourth quarters. All other series have a quarterly dividend declaration schedule. As previously announced, following the closing of the public exchange offers, Citigroup suspended payment of dividends on all remaining outstanding preferred securities.

        Other than securities containing customary anti-dilution provisions, Citigroup's only outstanding instruments subject to potential resets are the warrant to purchase 210,084,034 shares of common stock issued to the U.S. Treasury as part of TARP on November 28, 2008, the warrant to purchase 188,501,414 shares of common stock issued to the U.S. Treasury as part of


Table of Contents

TARP on December 31, 2008, and the warrant to purchase 66,531,728 shares of common stock issued to the U.S. Treasury as consideration for the loss-sharing agreement on January 15, 2009. Under the terms of the warrants, the number of shares of common stock for which the warrants are exercisable and the exercise price of the warrants will be subject to a reset if, prior to the third anniversary of issue date of the warrants, Citigroup issues shares of common stock (or


Table of Contents

rights or warrants or other securities exercisable or convertible into or exchangeable for shares of common stock) (collectively, "convertible securities") without consideration or at a consideration per share (or having a conversion price per share) that is less than 90% of the market price of Citigroup's common stock on the last trading day preceding the date of the agreement on pricing such shares (or such convertible securities), subject to specified exceptions.

Exchange Offers

        During the third quarter of 2009, Citigroup closed its exchange offers with the private and public holders of preferred stock. The UST matched $25 billion of these exchange offers. In addition, see Note 23 tototal, approximately $74 billion in preferred stock was exchanged for common stock and converted into TRuPs as a result of the Consolidated Financial Statements,"Exchange Offers," below.completion of the exchange offers.


Table of Contents


14.    CHANGES IN ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

        Changes in each component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (AOCI) for the first and secondthree quarters of 2009 were as follows:

In millions of dollars Net unrealized
gains (losses) on
investment
securities
 Foreign
currency
translation
adjustment,
net of hedges
 Cash flow
hedges
 Pension
liability
adjustments
 Accumulated other
comprehensive
income (loss)
 
Balance, December 31, 2008 $(9,647)$(7,744)$(5,189)$(2,615)$(25,195)
Cumulative effect of accounting change (FSP FAS 115-2 /ASC 320-10-65-1)  (413)       (413)
            
Balance, January 1, 2009 $(10,060)$(7,744)$(5,189)$(2,615)$(25,608)
Decrease (increase) in net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities, net of taxes(1)(3)  31        31 
Less: Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income, net of taxes  (11)       (11)
FX translation adjustment, net of taxes(2)    (2,974)     (2,974)
Cash flow hedges, net of taxes(3)      1,483    1,483 
Pension liability adjustment, net of taxes        66  66 
            
Change $20 $(2,974)$1,483 $66 $(1,405)
            
Citigroup Stockholders AOCI balance, March 31, 2009 $(10,040)$(10,718)$(3,706)$(2,549)$(27,013)
            
Decrease (increase) in net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities, net of taxes(1)(3)  2,890        2,890 
Less: Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income, net of taxes  95        95 
FX translation adjustment, net of taxes(4)    2,406      2,406 
Cash flow hedges, net of taxes(3)      41    41 
Pension liability adjustment, net of taxes        (62) (62)
            
Change $2,985 $2,406 $41 $(62)$5,370 
            
Citigroup Stockholders AOCI balance, June 30, 2009 $(7,055)$(8,312)$(3,665)$(2,611)$(21,643)
            

In millions of dollars Net unrealized
gains (losses) on
investment
securities
 Foreign
currency
translation
adjustment,
net of hedges
 Cash flow
hedges
 Pension
liability
adjustments
 Accumulated other
comprehensive
income (loss)
 

Balance, December 31, 2008

 $(9,647)$(7,744)$(5,189)$(2,615)$(25,195)

Cumulative effect of accounting change (ASC 320-10-65- 1/FSP FAS 115-2)

  (413)       (413)
            

Balance, January 1, 2009

 $(10,060)$(7,744)$(5,189)$(2,615)$(25,608)

Decrease (increase) in net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities, net of taxes(1)(3)

  31        31 

Less: Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income, net of taxes

  (11)       (11)

FX translation adjustment, net of taxes(2)

    (2,974)     (2,974)

Cash flow hedges, net of taxes(3)

      1,483    1,483 

Pension liability adjustment, net of taxes

        66  66 
            

Change

 $20 $(2,974)$1,483 $66 $(1,405)
            

Citigroup Stockholders AOCI balance, March 31, 2009

 $(10,040)$(10,718)$(3,706)$(2,549)$(27,013)
            

Decrease (increase) in net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities, net of taxes(1)(3)

  2,890        2,890 

Less: Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income, net of taxes

  95        95 

FX translation adjustment, net of taxes(4)

    2,406      2,406 

Cash flow hedges, net of taxes(3)

      41    41 

Pension liability adjustment, net of taxes

        (62) (62)
            

Change

 $2,985 $2,406 $41 $(62)$5,370 
            

Citigroup Stockholders AOCI balance, June 30, 2009

 $(7,055)$(8,312)$(3,665)$(2,611)$(21,643)
            

Decrease (increase) in net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities, net of taxes(1)(3)

  2,968        2,968 

Less: Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income, net of taxes

  (155)       (155)

FX translation adjustment, net of taxes(5)

    1,699      1,699 

Cash flow hedges, net of taxes(3)

      (512)   (512)

Pension liability adjustment, net of taxes

        (8) (8)
            

Change

 $2,813 $1,699 $(512)$(8)$3,992 
            

Citigroup Stockholders AOCI balance, September 30, 2009

 $(4,242)$(6,613)$(4,177)$(2,619)$(17,651)
            

(1)
Primarily related to AFS Prime MBS, municipal and other debt securities.

(2)
Reflects, among other items, the movements in the Japanese yen,Yen, Korean won,Won, Euro, Pound Sterling, Polish Zloty, Mexican pesoPeso and the Singapore dollarDollar against the U.S. dollar,Dollar, and changes in related tax effects.

(3)
Decrease (increase) in net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities, net of taxes includes the change in the hedged senior debt securities retained from the sale of a portfolio of highly leveraged loans. The offsetting change in the corresponding cash flow hedge is reflected in Cash Flow hedges, net of taxes.

(4)
Reflects, among other items, the movements in the British Pound, Mexican Peso, Japanese Yen, Australian Dollar, Korean Won, and the Euro against the U.S. dollar, and changes in related tax effects.

(5)
Reflects among other items, the movements in the Japanese Yen, Korean Won, Brazilian Real, Australian Dollar, Polish Zloty, Canadian Dollar, Euro, British Pound and the Mexican Peso against the U.S. dollar, and changes in related tax effects.

Table of Contents


15.    SECURITIZATIONS AND VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

Overview

        Citigroup and its subsidiaries are involved with several types of off-balance sheet arrangements, including special purpose entities (SPEs). See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of impending accounting changes to SFAS 140,Accountingthe accounting for Transferstransfers and Servicingservicing of Financial Assetsfinancial assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities (SFAS 140 /ASC 860), and FASB Interpretation No. 46, "ConsolidationConsolidation of Variable Interest Entities, (revised December 2003) (FIN 46 (R)/ASC 810-10)."including the elimination of qualifying SPEs

Uses of SPEs

        An SPE is an entity designed to fulfill a specific limited need of the company that organized it.

        The principal uses of SPEs are to obtain liquidity and favorable capital treatment by securitizing certain of Citigroup's financial assets, to assist clients in securitizing their financial assets, and to create investment products for clients. SPEs may be organized in many legal forms including trusts, partnerships or corporations. In a securitization, the company transferring assets to an SPE converts those assets into cash before they would have been realized in the normal course of business, through the SPE's issuance of debt and equity instruments, certificates, commercial paper and other notes of indebtedness, which are recorded on the balance sheet of the SPE and not reflected on the transferring company's balance sheet, assuming applicable accounting requirements are satisfied. Investors usually have recourse to the assets in the SPE and often benefit from other credit enhancements, such as a collateral account or over collateralization in the form of excess assets in the SPE, or from a liquidity facility, such as a line of credit, liquidity put option or asset purchase agreement. The SPE can typically obtain a more favorable credit rating from rating agencies than the transferor could obtain for its own debt issuances, resulting in less expensive financing costs. The SPE may also enter into derivative contracts in order to convert the yield or currency of the underlying assets to match the needs of the SPE investors, or to limit or change the credit risk of the SPE. Citigroup may be the provider of certain credit enhancements as well as the counterparty to any related derivative contracts.

        SPEs may be Qualifying SPEs (QSPEs) or Variable Interest Entities (VIEs) or neither.

Qualifying SPEs

        QSPEs are a special class of SPEs defined in SFAS 140 /ASC 860-40-15. QSPEsthat have significant limitations on the types of assets and derivative instruments they may own or enter into and the types and extent of activities and decision-making they may engage in. Generally, QSPEs are passive entities designed to purchase assets and pass through the cash flows from those assets to the investors in the QSPE. QSPEs may not actively manage their assets through discretionary sales and are generally limited to making decisions inherent in servicing activities and issuance of liabilities. QSPEs are generally exempt from consolidation by the transferor of assets to the QSPE and any investor or counterparty.

Variable Interest Entities

        VIEs are entities defined in FIN 46(R)/ASC 810-10-15, as entities that have either a total equity investment that is insufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or whose equity investors lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest (i.e., ability to make significant decisions through voting rights, right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity and obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity). Investors that finance the VIE through debt or equity interests or other counterparties that provide other forms of support, such as guarantees, subordinated fee arrangements, or certain types of derivative contracts, are variable interest holders in the entity. The variable interest holder, if any, that will absorb a majority of the entity's expected losses, receive a majority of the entity's expected residual returns, or both, is deemed to be the primary beneficiary and must consolidate the VIE. Consolidation of a VIE is determined based primarily on variability generated in scenarios that are considered most likely to occur, rather than based on scenarios that are considered more remote. Certain variable interests may absorb significant amounts of losses or residual returns contractually, but if those scenarios are considered very unlikely to occur, they may not lead to consolidation of the VIE.

        All of these facts and circumstances are taken into consideration when determining whether the Company has variable interests that would deem it the primary beneficiary and, therefore, require consolidation of the related VIE or otherwise rise to the level where disclosure would provide useful information to the users of the Company's financial statements. In some cases, it is qualitatively clear based on the extent of the Company's involvement or the seniority of its investments that the Company is not the primary beneficiary of the VIE. In other cases, a more detailed and quantitative analysis is required to make such a determination.

        The Company generally considers the following types of involvement to be significant:

    assisting in the structuring of a transaction and retaining any amount of debt financing (e.g., loans, notes, bonds or other debt instruments) or an equity investment (e.g., common shares, partnership interests or warrants);

    writing a "liquidity put" or other liquidity facility to support the issuance of short-term notes;

    writing credit protection (e.g., guarantees, letters of credit, credit default swaps or total return swaps where the Company receives the total return or risk on the assets held by the VIE); or

    certain transactions where the Company is the investment manager and receives variable fees for services.

        In various other transactions, the Company may act as a derivative counterparty (for example, interest rate swap, cross-currency swap, or purchaser of credit protection under a credit default swap or total return swap where the Company pays the total return on certain assets to the SPE); may act as underwriter or placement agent; may provide administrative, trustee, or other services; or may make a market in debt securities or other instruments issued by VIEs. The Company generally considers such involvement, by itself, "not significant" under FIN 46(R)/ASC 810-10-25..


Table of Contents

        Citigroup's involvement with QSPEs and Consolidated and Unconsolidated VIEs with which the Company holds significant variable interests as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 is presented below:

As of June 30, 2009 
 
  
  
  
  
 Maximum exposure to loss in significant unconsolidated VIEs(1) 
 
  
  
  
  
 Funded exposures(3) Unfunded exposures(4) 
In millions of dollars Total
involvement
with SPE assets
 QSPE
assets
 Consolidated
VIE assets
 Significant
unconsolidated
VIE assets(2)
 Debt
investments
 Equity
investments
 Funding
commitments
 Guarantees and
derivatives
 
Citicorp                         
Credit card securitizations $77,382 $77,382 $ $ $ $ $ $ 
Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP)  29,884      29,884  178    29,706   
Third-party commercial paper conduits  9,623      9,623      562  20 
Collateralized debt obligations (CDOs)  3,495      3,495  12       
Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs)  4,801      4,801  187       
Mortgage loan securitization  85,072  85,072             
Asset-based financing  15,260    1,522  13,738  3,275  45  410  149 
Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs)  26,271  759  16,484  9,028  48    6,543  558 
Municipal investments  591      591    34     
Client intermediation  8,211    2,754  5,457  1,202  22     
Investment funds  124    34  90  14      2 
Trust preferred securities  24,034      24,034    161     
Other  9,703  3,537  1,903  4,263  352  4     
                  
Total $294,451 $166,750 $22,697 $105,004 $5,268 $266 $37,221 $729 
                  
Citi Holdings                         
Credit card securitizations $42,566 $42,566 $ $ $ $ $ $ 
Mortgage securitizations  521,830  521,830             
Student loan securitizations  15,042  15,042             
Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP)  14,809    237  14,572      14,180  392 
Third-party commercial paper conduits  6,112      6,112  301    169   
Collateralized debt obligations (CDOs)  20,619    8,170  12,449  651      524 
Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs)  15,983    72  15,911  1,602    12  247 
Asset-based financing  58,948    475  58,473  17,179  68  1,543   
Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs)  2,260    2,260           
Municipal investments  16,824    879  15,945    2,005  611   
Client intermediation  639    280  359  27       
Investment funds  9,392    1,248  8,144    143     
Other  5,360  777  3,137  1,446  227  122  269   
                  
Total $730,384 $580,215 $16,758 $133,411 $19,987 $2,338 $16,784 $1,163 
                  
Total Citigroup $1,024,835 $746,965 $39,455 $238,415 $25,255 $2,604 $54,005 $1,892 
                  

As of September 30, 2009 
 
  
  
  
  
 Maximum exposure to loss in significant unconsolidated VIEs(1) 
 
  
  
  
  
 Funded exposures(2) Unfunded exposures(3) 
 
 Total
involvement
with SPE
assets
  
  
  
 
In millions of dollars QSPE
assets
 Consolidated
VIE assets
 Significant
unconsolidated
VIE assets(4)
 Debt
investments
 Equity
investments
 Funding
commitments
 Guarantees
and
derivatives
 

Citicorp

                         

Credit card securitizations

 $78,346 $78,346 $ $ $ $ $ $ 

Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP)

  24,733      24,733  109    24,250  374 

Third-party commercial paper conduits

  4,114      4,114      353   

Collateralized debt obligations (CDOs)

  3,477      3,477  15       

Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs)

  3,991      3,991  44       

Mortgage loan securitization

  82,916  82,916             

Asset-based financing

  19,763    1,426  18,337  3,965  44  649  491 

Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs)

  19,754  710  9,781  9,263      6,079  689 

Municipal investments

  577      577    40  17   

Client intermediation

  7,525    2,948  4,577  1,225  12     

Investment funds

  108    38  70  13      2 

Trust preferred securities

  34,531      34,531    128     

Other

  7,643  1,809  1,782  4,052  258    10   
                  

Total

 $287,478 $163,781 $15,975 $107,722 $5,629 $224 $31,358 $1,556 
                  

Citi Holdings

                         

Credit card securitizations

 $41,315 $41,315 $ $ $ $ $ $ 

Mortgage securitizations

  513,004  513,004             

Student loan securitizations

  14,691  14,691             

Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP)

  15,106    153  14,953      14,935  18 

Third-party commercial paper conduits

  7,770      7,770  298    252   

Collateralized debt obligations (CDOs)

  21,148    8,491  12,657  962      463 

Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs)

  9,896    72  9,824  1,543    32  247 

Asset-based financing

  53,381    430  52,951  16,166  75  1,697   

Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs)

  2,336    2,336           

Municipal investments

  16,294    879  15,415    2,012  529   

Client intermediation

  671    226  445  43      353 

Investment funds

  10,042    1,283  8,759  — —  247  169   

Other

  3,427  694  1,866  867  203  125  224   
                  

Total

 $709,081 $569,704 $15,736 $123,641 $19,215 $2,459 $17,838 $1,081 
                  

Total Citigroup

 $996,559 $733,485 $31,711 $231,363 $24,844 $2,683 $49,196 $2,637 
                  

(1)
The definition of maximum exposure to loss is included in the text that follows.

(2)
Included in Citigroup's September 30, 2009 Consolidated Balance Sheet.

(3)
Not included in Citigroup's September 30, 2009 Consolidated Balance Sheet.

(4)
A significant unconsolidated VIE is an entity where the Company has any variable interest considered to be significant, regardless of the likelihood of loss or the notional amount of exposure.

(3)
Included in Citigroup's June 30, 2009 Consolidated Balance Sheet.

(4)
Not included in Citigroup's June 30, 2009 Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Table of Contents

 As of June 30, 2009
(continued)
 As of December 31, 2008(1)
In millions of dollars
 
 
Total
maximum exposure to loss
in significant unconsolidated
VIEs (continued)(3)
 Total
involvement
with SPEs
 QSPE
assets
 Consolidated
VIE assets
 Significant
unconsolidated
VIE assets(2)
 Maximum exposure to loss in
significant unconsolidated VIE assets(3)
 
 $ $78,254 $78,254 $ $ $ 
  29,884  36,108      36,108  36,108 
  582  10,589      10,589  579 
  12  4,042      4,042  12 
  187  3,343      3,343  2 
    84,953  84,953       
  3,879  16,930    1,629  15,301  4,556 
  7,149  27,047  5,964  12,135  8,948  7,884 
  34  593      593  35 
  1,224  8,332    3,480  4,852  1,476 
  16  71    45  26  31 
  161  23,899      23,899  162 
  356  10,394  3,737  2,419  4,238  370 
             
 $43,484 $304,555 $172,908 $19,708 $111,939 $51,215 
             
 $ $45,613 $45,613 $ $ $ 
    586,410  586,407  3     
    15,650  15,650       
  14,572  23,527      23,527  23,527 
  470  10,166      10,166  820 
  1,175  26,018    11,466  14,552  1,461 
  1,861  19,610    122  19,488  1,680 
  18,790  85,224    2,218  83,006  23,676 
    3,024  540  2,484     
  2,616  16,545    866  15,679  2,915 
  27  1,132    331  801  61 
  143  10,330    2,084  8,246  158 
  618  9,472  1,014  4,306  4,152  892 
             
 $40,272 $852,721 $649,224 $23,880 $179,617 $55,190 
             
 $83,756 $1,157,276 $822,132 $43,588 $291,556 $106,405 
             

As of September 30, 2009
(continued)
 As of December 31, 2008(1)
In millions of dollars
 
Total maximum exposure
to loss in significant
unconsolidated VIEs
(continued)(3)
 Total
involvement
with SPEs
 QSPE
assets
 Consolidated
VIE assets
 Significant
unconsolidated
VIE assets(2)
 Maximum exposure to
loss in significant
unconsolidated
VIE assets(3)
 
$ $78,254 $78,254 $ $ $ 
 24,733  36,108      36,108  36,108 
 353  10,589      10,589  579 
 15  4,042      4,042  12 
 44  3,343      3,343  2 
   84,953  84,953       
 5,149  16,930    1,629  15,301  4,556 
 6,768  27,047  5,964  12,135  8,948  7,884 
 57  593      593  35 
 1,237  8,332    3,480  4,852  1,476 
 15  71    45  26  31 
 128  23,899      23,899  162 
 268  10,394  3,737  2,419  4,238  370 
            
$38,767 $304,555 $172,908 $19,708 $111,939 $51,215 
            
$ $45,613 $45,613 $ $ $ 
   586,410  586,407  3     
   15,650  15,650       
 14,953  23,527      23,527  23,527 
 550  10,166      10,166  820 
 1,425  26,018    11,466  14,552  1,461 
 1,822  19,610    122  19,488  1,680 
 17,938  85,224    2,218  83,006  23,676 
   3,024  540  2,484     
 2,541  16,545    866  15,679  2,915 
 396  1,132    331  801  61 
 416  10,330    2,084  8,246  158 
 552  9,472  1,014  4,306  4,152  892 
            
$40,593 $852,721 $649,224 $23,880 $179,617 $55,190 
            
$79,360 $1,157,276 $822,132 $43,588 $291,556 $106,405 
            

(1)
Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.

(2)
A significant unconsolidated VIE is an entity where the Company has any variable interest considered to be significant, regardless of the likelihood of loss or the notional amount of exposure.

(3)
The definition of maximum exposure to loss is included in the text that follows.

Table of Contents

        This table does not include:

    certain venture capital investments made by some of the Company's private equity subsidiaries, as the Company accounts for these investments in accordance with the Investment Company Audit Guide;

    certain limited partnerships where the Company is the general partner and the limited partners have the right to replace the general partner or liquidate the funds;

    certain investment funds for which the Company provides investment management services and personal estate trusts for which the Company provides administrative, trustee and/or investment management services;

    VIEs structured by third parties where the Company holds securities in inventory. These investments are made on arm's-length terms; and

    transferred assets to a VIE where the transfer did not qualify as a sale and where the Company did not have any other involvement that is deemed to be a variable interest with the VIE. These transfers are accounted for as secured borrowings by the Company.

        The asset balances for consolidated VIEs represent the carrying amounts of the assets consolidated by the Company. The carrying amount may represent the amortized cost or the current fair value of the assets depending on the legal form of the asset (e.g., security or loan) and the Company's standard accounting policies for the asset type and line of business.

        The asset balances for unconsolidated VIEs where the Company has significant involvement represent the most current information available to the Company. In most cases, the asset balances represent an amortized cost basis without regard to impairments in fair value, unless fair value information is readily available to the Company. For VIEs that obtain asset exposures synthetically through derivative instruments (for example, synthetic CDOs), the table includes the full original notional amount of the derivative as an asset.

        The maximum funded exposure represents the balance sheet carrying amount of the Company's investment in the VIE. It reflects the initial amount of cash invested in the VIE plus any accrued interest and is adjusted for any impairments in value recognized in earnings and any cash principal payments received. The maximum exposure of unfunded positions represents the remaining undrawn committed amount, including liquidity and credit facilities provided by the Company, or the notional amount of a derivative instrument considered to be a variable interest, adjusted for any declines in fair value recognized in earnings. In certain transactions, the Company has entered into derivative instruments or other arrangements that are not considered variable interests in the VIE under FIN 46(R)/ASC 810-10-15 (e.g., interest rate swaps, cross-currency swaps, or where the Company is the purchaser of credit protection under a credit default swap or total return swap where the Company pays the total return on certain assets to the SPE). Receivables under such arrangements are not included in the maximum exposure amounts.

Funding Commitments for Significant Unconsolidated VIEs—Liquidity Facilities and Loan Commitments

        The following table presents the notional amount of liquidity facilities and loan commitments that are classified as funding commitments in the SPE table as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009:

In billions of dollars Liquidity
Facilities
 Loan
Commitments
 
Citicorp       
Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP) $25,506 $4,200 
Third-party commercial paper conduits  552  10 
Asset-based financing    410 
Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs)  6,543   
      
Total Citicorp $32,601 $4,620 
      
Citi Holdings       
Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP) $14,180 $ 
Third-party commercial paper conduits  169   
Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs)    12 
Asset-based financing    1,543 
Municipal investments    611 
Other    269 
      
Total Citi Holdings $14,349 $2,435 
      
Total Citigroup funding commitments $46,950 $7,055 
      

In billions of dollars Liquidity Facilities Loan Commitments 

Citicorp

       

Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP)

 $22,456 $1,794 

Third-party commercial paper conduits

  353   

Asset-based financing

    649 

Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs)

  6,079   

Municipal investments

    17 

Other

  10   
      

Total Citicorp

 $28,898 $2,460 
      

Citi Holdings

       

Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP)

 $13,329 $1,606 

Third-party commercial paper conduits

  252   

Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs)

  32   

Asset-based financing

    1,697 

Municipal investments

    529 

Investment Funds

    169 

Other

    224 
      

Total Citi Holdings

 $13,613 $4,225 
      

Total Citigroup funding commitments

 $42,511 $6,685 
      

Table of Contents

Citicorp's Consolidated VIEs—Balance Sheet Classification

        The following table presents the carrying amounts and classifications of consolidated assets that are collateral for consolidated VIE obligations:

In billions of dollars June 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 
Cash $0.4 $0.7 
Trading account assets  3.0  4.3 
Investments  17.0  12.5 
Loans  0.2  0.5 
Other assets  2.1  1.7 
      
Total assets of consolidated VIEs $22.7 $19.7 
      

In billions of dollars September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

Cash

 $0.0 $0.7 

Trading account assets

  3.5  4.3 

Investments

  10.2  12.5 

Loans

  0.3  0.5 

Other assets

  2.0  1.7 
      

Total assets of consolidated VIEs

 $16.0 $19.7 
      

        The following table presents the carrying amounts and classification of the third-party liabilities of the consolidated VIEs:

In billions of dollars June 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 
Short-term borrowings $16.8 $14.2 
Long-term debt  5.7  5.6 
Other liabilities  0.2  0.9 
      
Total liabilities of consolidated VIEs $22.7 $20.7 
      

In billions of dollars September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

Short-term borrowings

 $9.4 $14.2 

Long-term debt

  5.6  5.6 

Other liabilities

  0.2  0.9 
      

Total liabilities of consolidated VIEs

 $15.2 $20.7 
      

        The consolidated VIEs included in the table above represent hundreds of separate entities with which the Company is involved. In general, the third-party investors in the obligations of consolidated VIEs have legal recourse only to the assets of the VIEs and do not have such recourse to the Company, except where the Company has provided a guarantee to the investors or is the counterparty to certain derivative transactions involving the VIE. In addition, the assets are generally restricted only to pay such liabilities. Thus, the Company's maximum legal exposure to loss related to consolidated VIEs is significantly less than the carrying value of the consolidated VIE assets due to outstanding third-party financing. Intercompany liabilities are excluded from the table.

Citi Holdings' Consolidated VIEs—Balance Sheet Classification

        The following table presents the carrying amounts and classifications of consolidated assets that are collateral for consolidated VIE obligations:

In billions of dollars June 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 
Cash $0.7 $1.2 
Trading account assets  10.5  16.6 
Investments  3.1  3.3 
Loans  1.8  2.1 
Other assets  0.7  0.7 
      
Total assets of consolidated VIEs $16.8 $23.9 
      

In billions of dollars September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

Cash

 $0.5 $1.2 

Trading account assets

  10.9  16.6 

Investments

  3.1  3.3 

Loans

  0.6  2.1 

Other assets

  0.6  0.7 
      

Total assets of consolidated VIEs

 $15.7 $23.9 
      

        The following table presents the carrying amounts and classification of the third-party liabilities of the consolidated VIEs:

In billions of dollars June 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 
Trading account liabilities $0.2 $0.5 
Short-term borrowings  2.9  2.8 
Long-term debt  0.5  1.2 
Other liabilities  1.2  2.1 
      
Total liabilities of consolidated VIEs $4.8 $6.6 
      

In billions of dollars September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

Trading account liabilities

 $0.2 $0.5 

Short-term borrowings

  3.0  2.8 

Long-term debt

  0.5  1.2 

Other liabilities

  1.2  2.1 
      

Total liabilities of consolidated VIEs

 $4.9 $6.6 
      

Citicorp's Significant Interests in Unconsolidated VIEs—Balance Sheet Classification

        The following table presents the carrying amounts and classification of significant interests in unconsolidated VIEs:

In billions of dollars June 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 
Trading account assets $1.2 $1.9 
Investments  0.2  0.2 
Loans  3.4  3.5 
Other assets  0.6  0.4 
      
Total assets of significant interest in unconsolidated VIEs $5.4 $6.0 
      


In billions of dollars June 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

Long-term debt

 $0.5 $0.4 
      

Total liabilities of significant interest in unconsolidated VIEs

 $0.5 $0.4 
      
In billions of dollars September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

Trading account assets

 $3.4 $1.9 

Investments

  0.8  0.2 

Loans

  2.4  3.5 

Other assets

  0.6  0.4 
      

Total assets of significant interest in unconsolidated VIEs

 $7.2 $6.0 
      

In billions of dollars September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

Long-term debt

 $0.5 $0.4 
      

Total liabilities of significant interest in unconsolidated VIEs

 $0.5 $0.4 
      

Citi Holdings' Significant Interests in Unconsolidated VIEs—Balance Sheet Classification

        The following table presents the carrying amounts and classification of significant interests in unconsolidated VIEs:

In billions of dollars June 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 
Trading account assets $4.0 $4.4 
Investments  9.8  8.2 
Loans  12.8  12.4 
Other assets  0.1  2.6 
      
Total assets of significant interest in unconsolidated VIEs $26.7 $27.6 
      


In billions of dollars June 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

Trading account liabilities

 $0.5 $0.2 

Other liabilities

  0.4  0.6 
      

Total liabilities of significant interest in unconsolidated VIEs

 $0.9 $0.8 
      
In billions of dollars September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

Trading account assets

 $2.8 $4.4 

Investments

  8.8  8.2 

Loans

  12.6  12.4 

Other assets

  0.1  2.6 
      

Total assets of significant interest in unconsolidated VIEs

 $24.3 $27.6 
      

In billions of dollars September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

Trading account liabilities

 $0.0 $0.2 

Other liabilities

  0.3  0.6 
      

Total liabilities of significant interest in unconsolidated VIEs

 $0.3 $0.8 
      

Table of Contents

Credit Card Securitizations

        The Company securitizes credit card receivables through trusts that are established to purchase the receivables. Citigroup sells receivables into the QSPE trusts on a non-recourse basis. Credit card securitizations are revolving securitizations; that is, as customers pay their credit card balances, the cash proceeds are used to purchase new receivables and replenish the receivables in the trust. The Company relies on securitizations to fund a significant portion of its managedNorth America Cards business.

        The following table reflects amounts related to the Company's securitized credit card receivables at JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:

 
 Citicorp Citi Holdings 
In billions of dollars June 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 June 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 
Principal amount of credit card receivables in trusts $77.4 $78.3 $42.6 $45.7 
          
Ownership interests in principal amount of trust credit card receivables:��            
Sold to investors via trust-issued securities  65.5  68.2  28.3  30.0 
Retained by Citigroup as trust-issued securities  5.1  1.2  9.0  5.4 
Retained by Citigroup via non-certificated interests recorded as consumer loans  6.8  8.9  5.3  10.3 
          
Total ownership interests in principal amount of trust credit card receivables $77.4 $78.3 $42.6 $45.7 
          
Other amounts recorded on the balance sheet related to interests retained in the trusts:             
Other retained interests in securitized assets $1.2 $1.2 $1.6 $2.0 
Residual interest in securitized assets(1)  0.3  0.3  1.0  1.4 
Amounts payable to trusts  1.2  1.0  0.7  0.7 
          

 
 Citicorp Citi Holdings 
In billions of dollars September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

Principal amount of credit card receivables in trusts

 $78.3 $78.3 $41.3 $45.7 
          

Ownership interests in principal amount of trust credit card receivables:

             

Sold to investors via trust-issued securities

  65.5  68.2  26.5  30.0 

Retained by Citigroup as trust-issued securities

  5.1  1.2  9.5  5.4 

Retained by Citigroup via non-certificated interests recorded as consumer loans

  7.7  8.9  5.3  10.3 
          

Total ownership interests in principal amount of trust credit card receivables

 $78.3 $78.3 $41.3 $45.7 
          

Other amounts recorded on the balance sheet related to interests retained in the trusts:

             

Other retained interests in securitized assets

 $1.3 $1.2 $1.6 $2.0 

Residual interest in securitized assets(1)

  0.3  0.3  1.0  1.4 

Amounts payable to trusts

  1.1  1.0  0.7  0.7 
          

(1)
JuneSeptember 30, 2009 balances include net unbilled interest of $0.3B$0.3 billion for Citicorp and $0.4B$0.4 billion for Citi Holdings. December 31, 2008 balances included net unbilled interest of $0.3B for Citicorp and $0.3B for Citi Holdings.

Credit Card Securitizations—Citicorp

        In the secondthird quarter of 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded net gains (losses) from securitization of Citicorp's credit card receivables of $51$102 million and ($141)682) million, and $151$253 million and ($146)828) million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Net gains (losses) reflect the following:

    incremental gains (losses) from new securitizations;

    the reversal of the allowance for loan losses associated with receivables sold;

    net gains on replenishments of the trust assets offset by other-than-temporary impairments; and

    changes in fair value for the portion of the residual interest classified as trading assets.

        The following tables summarize selected cash flow information related to Citicorp's credit card securitizations for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008:

 
 Three months ended 
In billions of dollars June 30,
2009
 June 30,
2008
 

Proceeds from new securitizations

 $5.9 $3.2 

Proceeds from collections reinvested in new receivables

  36.1  44.6 

Contractual servicing fees received

  0.3  0.3 

Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

  0.7  1.0 
      

 
 Three months ended 
In billions of dollars September 30,
2009
 September 30,
2008
 

Proceeds from new securitizations

 $1.0 $0.8 

Proceeds from collections reinvested in new receivables

  38.5  42.4 

Contractual servicing fees received

  0.3  0.3 

Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

  0.7  1.0 
      

 

 
 Six months ended 
In billions of dollars June 30,
2009
 June 30,
2008
 

Proceeds from new securitizations

 $10.6 $9.2 

Proceeds from collections reinvested in new receivables

  71.5  86.7 

Contractual servicing fees received

  0.6  0.6 

Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

  1.6  2.1 
      

 
 Nine months ended 
In billions of dollars September 30,
2009
 September 30,
2008
 

Proceeds from new securitizations

 $11.7 $10.0 

Proceeds from collections reinvested in new receivables

  110.0  129.1 

Contractual servicing fees received

  1.0  1.0 

Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

  2.3  3.1 
      

        As of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the residual interest in securitized credit card receivables was valued at $0 for Citicorp. As such, key assumptions used in measuring the fair value of the residual interest are not provided for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 or as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009. Key assumptions used in measuring the fair value of the residual interests at the date of sale or securitization of Citicorp's credit card receivables for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30 2008 are as follows:

 
 JuneSeptember 30,
2009
 JuneSeptember 30,
2008

Discount rate

 NA 14.5% to 17.4%

Constant prepayment rate

 NA 5.9% to 20.3%20.0%

Anticipated net credit losses

 NA 5.1%5.8% to 5.2%6.2%
     

Table of Contents

        At JuneSeptember 30, 2009, the sensitivity of the fair value to adverse changes of 10% and 20% in each of the key assumptions were as follows:

In millions of dollars Residual
interest
 Retained
certificates
 Other
retained
interests
 

Carrying value of retained interests

 $ $5,177 $1,426 
        

Discount rates

          
 

Adverse change of 10%

 $ $(13)$(1)
 

Adverse change of 20%

    (25) (2)

Constant prepayment rate

          
 

Adverse change of 10%

 $ $ $ 
 

Adverse change of 20%

       

Anticipated net credit losses

          
 

Adverse change of 10%

 $ $ $(36)
 

Adverse change of 20%

      (71)
        

In millions of dollars Residual
interest
 Retained
certificates
 Other
retained
interests
 

Carrying value of retained interests

 $ $5,186 $1,547 
        

Discount rates

          
 

Adverse change of 10%

 $ $(6)$(1)
 

Adverse change of 20%

    (12) (2)

Constant prepayment rate

          
 

Adverse change of 10%

 $ $ $ 
 

Adverse change of 20%

       

Anticipated net credit losses

          
 

Adverse change of 10%

 $ $ $(31)
 

Adverse change of 20%

      (62)
        

Managed Loans—Citicorp

        After securitization of credit card receivables, the Company continues to maintain credit card customer account relationships and provides servicing for receivables transferred to the trusts. As a result, the Company considers the securitized credit card receivables to be part of the business it manages.

        Managed-basis (Managed) presentations are non-GAAP financial measures. Managed presentations include results from both the on-balance sheet loans and off-balance sheet loans, and exclude the impact of card securitization activity. Managed presentations assume that securitized loans have not been sold and present the results of the securitized loans in the same manner as Citigroup's owned loans. Citigroup's management believes that Managed presentations provide a greater understanding of ongoing operations and enhance comparability of those results in prior periods as well as demonstrating the effects of unusual gains and charges in the current period. Management further believes that a meaningful analysis of the Company's financial performance requires an understanding of the factors underlying that performance and that investors find it useful to see these non-GAAP financial measures to analyze financial performance without the impact of unusual items that may obscure trends in Citigroup's underlying performance.

        The following tables present a reconciliation between the Managed basis and on-balance sheet credit card portfolios and the related delinquencies (loans which are 90 days or more past due) and credit losses, net of recoveries.

In millions of dollars, except loans in billions June 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

Loan amounts, at period end

       

On balance sheet

 $42.1 $45.5 

Securitized amounts

  70.7  69.5 
      

Total managed loans

 $112.8 $115.0 
      

Delinquencies, at period end

       

On balance sheet

 $1,459 $1,402 

Securitized amounts

  1,898  1,543 
      

Total managed delinquencies

 $3,357 $2,945 
      

In millions of dollars, except loans in billions September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

Loan amounts, at period end

       

On balance sheet

 $44.3 $45.5 

Securitized amounts

  70.8  69.5 
      

Total managed loans

 $115.1 $115.0 
      

Delinquencies, at period end

       

On balance sheet

 $1,160 $1,126 

Securitized amounts

  1,730  1,543 
      

Total managed delinquencies

 $2,890 $2,669 
      

 

Credit losses, net of recoveries, for the three months ended June 30, 2009 2008 

On balance sheet

 $978 $700 

Securitized amounts

  1,838  1,043 
      

Total managed

 $2,816 $1,743 
      

Credit losses, net of recoveries, for the
three months ended September 30,
 2009 2008 

On balance sheet

 $1,047 $779 

Securitized amounts

  1,876  1,123 
      

Total managed

 $2,923 $1,902 
      

 

Credit losses, net of recoveries, for the six months ended June 30, 2009 2008 

On balance sheet

 $1,815 $1,338 

Securitized amounts

  3,329  1,923 
      

Total managed

 $5,144 $3,261 
      

Credit losses, net of recoveries, for the
nine months ended September 30,
 2009 2008 

On balance sheet

 $2,862 $2,117 

Securitized amounts

  5,205  3,046 
      

Total managed

 $8,067 $5,163 
      

Credit Card Securitizations—Citi Holdings

        In the secondthird quarter of 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded net gains (losses) from securitization of Citi Holding's credit card receivables of ($612)105) million and ($35),762) million, and ($676)781) million and $192($570) million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

        The following tables summarize selected cash flow information related to Citi Holding's credit card securitizations for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008:

 
 Three months ended 
In billions of dollars June 30,
2009
 June 30,
2008
 
Proceeds from new securitizations $10.6 $6.8 
Proceeds from collections reinvested in new receivables  13.6  13.0 
Contractual servicing fees received  0.2  0.2 
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows  0.6  0.9 
      

 
 Three months ended 
In billions of dollars September 30,
2009
 September 30,
2008
 

Proceeds from new securitizations

 $4.3 $2.5 

Proceeds from collections reinvested in new receivables

  11.1  13.9 

Contractual servicing fees received

  0.2  0.2 

Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

  0.7  0.8 
      

 

 
 Six months ended 
In billions of dollars June 30,
2009
 June 30,
2008
 
Proceeds from new securitizations $18.7 $10.8 
Proceeds from collections reinvested in new receivables  25.8  26.4 
Contractual servicing fees received  0.4  0.4 
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows  1.2  1.8 
      

 
 Nine months ended 
In billions of dollars September 30,
2009
 September 30,
2008
 

Proceeds from new securitizations

 $23.0 $13.3 

Proceeds from collections reinvested in new receivables

  36.9  40.3 

Contractual servicing fees received

  0.5  0.5 

Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

  1.9  2.6 
      

Table of Contents

        Key assumptions used in measuring the fair value of the residual interest at the date of sale or securitization of Citi Holding's credit card receivables for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, are as follows:

 
 June 30,
2009
 June 30,
2008
Discount rate 19.7% 17.9%
Constant prepayment rate 6.0% to 10.7% 7.1% to 12.2%
Anticipated net credit losses 12.2% to 13.1% 6.6% to 6.8%


Table of Contents

September 30,
2009
September 30,
2008

Discount rate

19.7%17.9% to 20.9%

Constant prepayment rate

6.0% to 10.7%6.4% to 12.4%

Anticipated net credit losses

13.1% to 13.2%6.8% to 8.3%

        The constant prepayment rate assumption range reflects the projected payment rates over the life of a credit card balance, excluding new card purchases. This results in a high payment in the early life of the securitized balances followed by a much lower payment rate, which is depicted in the disclosed range.

        The effect of two negative changes in each of the key assumptions used to determine the fair value of retained interests is required to be disclosed. The negative effect of each change must be calculated independently, holding all other assumptions constant. Because the key assumptions may not in fact be independent, the net effect of simultaneous adverse changes in the key assumptions may be less than the sum of the individual effects shown below.

        At JuneSeptember 30, 2009, the key assumptions used to value retained interests and the sensitivity of the fair value to adverse changes of 10% and 20% in each of the key assumptions were as follows:

 
 JuneSeptember 30, 2009

Discount rate

 19.7%

Constant prepayment rate

 6.1%6.0% to 10.7%10.6%

Anticipated net credit losses

 13.1%13.2%

Weighted average life

 11.7 months
   

 

In millions of dollars Residual
interest
 Retained
certificates
 Other
retained
interests
 
Carrying value of retained interests $562 $8,784 $2,005 
        
Discount rates          
 Adverse change of 10% $(32)$(26)$(5)
 Adverse change of 20%  (62) (52) (10)
Constant prepayment rate          
 Adverse change of 10% $(39)$ $ 
 Adverse change of 20%  (74)    
Anticipated net credit losses          
 Adverse change of 10% $(377)$ $(43)
 Adverse change of 20%  (560)   (85)
        

In millions of dollars Residual
interest
 Retained
certificates
 Other
retained
interests
 

Carrying value of retained interests

 $628 $9,398 $1,926 
        

Discount rates

          
 

Adverse change of 10%

 $(31)$(14)$(6)
 

Adverse change of 20%

  (61) (29) (12)

Constant prepayment rate

          
 

Adverse change of 10%

 $(33)$ $ 
 

Adverse change of 20%

  (63)    

Anticipated net credit losses

          
 

Adverse change of 10%

 $(353)$ $(41)
 

Adverse change of 20%

  (628)   (83)
        

Managed Loans—Citi Holdings

        After securitization of credit card receivables, the Company continues to maintain credit card customer account relationships and provides servicing for receivables transferred to the trusts. As a result, the Company considers the securitized credit card receivables to be part of the business it manages.

        Managed-basis (Managed) presentations are non-GAAP financial measures. Managed presentations include results from both the on-balance sheet loans and off-balance sheet loans, and exclude the impact of card securitization activity. Managed presentations assume that securitized loans have not been sold and present the results of the securitized loans in the same manner as Citigroup's owned loans. Citigroup's management believes that Managed presentations provide a greater understanding of ongoing operations and enhance comparability of those results in prior periods as well as demonstrating the effects of unusual gains and charges in the current period. Management further believes that a meaningful analysis of the Company's financial performance requires an understanding of the factors underlying that performance and that investors find it useful to see these non-GAAP financial measures to analyze financial performance without the impact of unusual items that may obscure trends in Citigroup's underlying performance.

        The following tables present a reconciliation between the Managed basis and on-balance sheet credit card portfolios and the related delinquencies (loans which are 90 days or more past due) and credit losses, net of recoveries.

In millions of dollars, except loans in billions June 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 
Loan amounts, at period end       
On balance sheet $22.8 $30.1 
Securitized amounts  37.6  36.3 
Loans held-for-sale     
      
Total managed loans $60.4 $66.4 
      
Delinquencies, at period end       
On balance sheet $845 $741 
Securitized amounts  1,214  1,113 
Loans held-for-sale     
      
Total managed delinquencies $2,059 $1,854 
      

In millions of dollars, except loans in billions September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

Loan amounts, at period end

       

On balance sheet

 $21.7 $30.1 

Securitized amounts

  36.5  36.3 
      

Total managed loans

 $58.2 $66.4 
      

Delinquencies, at period end

       

On balance sheet

 $885 $1,017 

Securitized amounts

  1,219  1,113 
      

Total managed delinquencies

 $2,104 $2,130 
      

 

Credit losses, net of recoveries, for the three months ended June 30, 2009 2008 
On balance sheet $872 $565 
Securitized amounts  1,278  725 
Loans held-for-sale     
      
Total managed $2,150 $1,290 
      

Credit losses, net of recoveries, for the
three months ended September 30,
 2009 2008 

On balance sheet

 $867 $646 

Securitized amounts

  1,137  812 
      

Total managed

 $2,004 $1,458 
      

 

Credit losses, net of recoveries, for the six months ended June 30, 2009 2008 
On balance sheet $1,773 $1,048 
Securitized amounts  2,335  1,436 
Loans held-for-sale     
      
Total managed $4,108 $2,484 
      

Credit losses, net of recoveries, for the
nine months ended September 30,
 2009 2008 

On balance sheet

 $2,640 $1,694 

Securitized amounts

  3,472  2,248 
      

Total managed

 $6,112 $3,942 
      

Funding, Liquidity Facilities and Subordinated Interests

        Citigroup securitizes credit card receivables through three securitization trusts—Citibank Credit Card Master Trust ("Master Trust"), which is part of Citicorp and the Citibank OMNI Master Trust ("Omni Trust") and Broadway Credit Card Trust ("Broadway Trust"), which are part of Citi Holdings.

        Master Trust issues fixed and floating-rate term notes as well as commercial paper through the Dakota program.paper. Some of the term notes are issued to multi-seller commercial paper conduits. In the first half of 2009, the Master Trust has issued $4.3 billion of notes that are eligible for the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF) program, where investors can borrow from the Federal Reserve using the trust securities as collateral. The


Table of Contents

weighted average maturity of the term notes issued by the Master Trust was 3.53.7 years as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 3.8 years as of December 31, 2008.


Table of Contents

Master Trust liabilities:

In billions June 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 
Term notes issued to multi-seller CP conduits $0.5 $1.0 
Term notes issued to other third parties  54.0  56.2 
Term notes retained by Citigroup affiliates  5.1  1.2 
Dakota commercial paper program  11.0  11.0 
      
Total Master Trust liabilities $70.6 $69.4 
      

In billions of dollars September 30, 2009 December 31, 2008 

Term notes issued to multi- seller CP conduits

 $0.5 $1.0 

Term notes issued to other third parties

  53.0  56.2 

Term notes retained by Citigroup affiliates

  5.1  1.2 

Commercial paper

  12.0  11.0 
      

Total Master Trust liabilities

 $70.6 $69.4 
      

        Both Omni and Broadway Trusts issue fixed and floating-rate term notes, some of which are purchased by multi-seller commercial paper conduits. The Omni Trust also issues commercial paper through the Palisades program. Apaper. From time to time, a portion of the PalisadesOmni Trust commercial paper has been purchased by the Federal Reserve's Commercial Paper Funding Facility (CPFF). In addition, some of the multi-seller conduits that hold Omni Trust term notes have placed commercial paper with CPFF. The total amount of Omni Trust liabilities funded directly or indirectly through the CPFF was $9.3$5.2 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and $6.9 billion at December 31, 2008.

        In the secondthird quarter of 2009, Omni Trust issued $4.0$3.7 billion of term notes that are eligible for the TALF program. The weighted average maturity of the third party term notes issued by the Omni Trust was 0.92.6 years as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 0.5 years as of December 31, 2008. The weighted average maturity of the third party term notes issued by the Broadway Trust was 3.12.4 years as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 3.3 years as of December 31, 2008.

Omni Trust liabilities:

In billions June 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 
Term notes issued to multi- seller CP conduits $13.3 $17.8 
Term notes issued to other third parties  5.1  2.3 
Term notes retained by Citigroup affiliates  8.7  5.1 
Palisades commercial paper program  8.5  8.5 
      
Total Omni Trust liabilities $35.6 $33.7 
      

In billions of dollars September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

Term notes issued to multi- seller CP conduits

 $12.3 $17.8 

Term notes issued to other third parties

  8.3  2.3 

Term notes retained by Citigroup affiliates

  9.2  5.1 

Commercial paper

  4.4  8.5 
      

Total Omni Trust liabilities

 $34.2 $33.7 
      

Broadway Trust liabilities:

In billions June 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

Term notes issued to multi- seller CP conduits

 $0.4 $0.4 

Term notes issued to other third parties

  1.0  1.0 

Term notes retained by Citigroup affiliates

  0.3  0.3 
      

Total Broadway Trust liabilities

 $1.7 $1.7 
      

In billions of dollars September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

Term notes issued to multi- seller CP conduits

 $0.5 $0.4 

Term notes issued to other third parties

  1.0  1.0 

Term notes retained by Citigroup affiliates

  0.3  0.3 
      

Total Broadway Trust liabilities

 $1.8 $1.7 
      

Table of Contents

        Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. is the sole provider of full liquidity facilities to the commercial paper programs of the Master and Omni Trusts. Both of these facilities, which represent contractual obligations on the part of Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. to provide liquidity for the issued commercial paper, are made available on market terms to each of the trusts. The liquidity facilities require Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. to purchase the commercial paper issued by each trust at maturity, if the commercial paper does not roll over, as long as there are available credit enhancements outstanding, typically in the form of subordinated notes. The liquidity commitment related to the Omni Trust commercial paper programs, amounted to $4.4 billion at September 30, 2009 and $8.5 billion at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. During the second quarter of 2009, $4 billion of the Omni Trust liquidity facility was drawn to pay down maturing commercial paper held by a single investor. This investor made its initial investment in Omni Trust commercial paper in January 2009 and was covered by the Citibank (South Dakota) N.A. liquidity facility. The portion of the liquidity facility related to the maturing commercial paper was cancelled during the 2009 second quarter and is no longer outstanding as of June 30, 2009. The liquidity commitment related to the Master Trust commercial paper program amounted to $12 billion at September 30, 2009 and $11 billion at both June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, none of the Master Trust or Omni Trust liquidity commitments were drawn.

        In addition, Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. provides liquidity to a third-party, non-consolidated multi-seller commercial paper conduit, which is not a VIE. The commercial paper conduit has acquired notes issued by the Omni Trust. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. provides the liquidity facility on market terms. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. will be required to act in its capacity as liquidity provider as long as there are available credit enhancements outstanding and if: (1) the conduit is unable to roll over its maturing commercial paper; or (2) Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. loses its A-1/P-1 credit rating. The liquidity commitment to the third-party conduit was $5.2 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and $4 billion at December 31, 2008. As of June,September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, none of this liquidity commitment was drawn.

        All three of Citigroup's primary credit card securitization trusts have had bonds placed on ratings watch with negative implications by rating agencies during the first, second and secondthird quarters of 2009. As a result of the ratings watch status, certain actions were taken with respect to each of the trusts. In general, the actions subordinated certain senior interests in the trust assets that were retained by Citigroup, which effectively placed these interests below investor interests in terms of priority of payment. With respect to the Master Trust, in the first quarter of 2009, Citigroup subordinated a portion of its "seller's interest", which represents a senior interest in Trust receivables, thus making those cash flows available to pay investor coupon each month. In addition, during the second quarter of 2009, a subordinated note with a $3 billion principal amount was issued by the Master Trust and retained by Citibank (South Dakota), N.A., in order to provide additional credit support for the senior note classes. The note is


Table of Contents

classified as Held-to-maturity Investment Securitiesheld-to-maturity investment securities as Citigroup has the intent and ability to hold the security until its maturity. With respect to the Omni Trust, in the second quarter of 2009, subordinated notes with a principal amount of $2 billion were issued by the Trust and retained by Citibank (South Dakota), N.A., in order to provide additional credit support for the senior note classes. The notes are classified asTrading account assets.assets. These notes are in addition to a $265 million subordinated note issued by Omni Trust and retained by Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. in the fourth quarter of 2008 for the purpose of providing additional credit support for senior noteholders. With respect to the Broadway Trust, subordinated notes with a principal amount of $82 million were issued by the Trust and retained by Citibank, N.A., in order to provide additional credit support for the senior note classes. The notes are classified asTrading account assets.assets.


Table of Contents

Mortgage Securitizations

        The Company provides a wide range of mortgage loan products to a diverse customer base. In connection with the securitization of these loans, the Company's U.S. Consumer mortgage business retains the servicing rights, which entitle the Company to a future stream of cash flows based on the outstanding principal balances of the loans and the contractual servicing fee. Failure to service the loans in accordance with contractual requirements may lead to a termination of the servicing rights and the loss of future servicing fees. In non-recourse servicing, the principal credit risk to the Company is the cost of temporary advances of funds. In recourse servicing, the servicer agrees to share credit risk with the owner of the mortgage loans, such as FNMA or FHLMC, or with a private investor, insurer or guarantor. Losses on recourse servicing occur primarily when foreclosure sale proceeds of the property underlying a defaulted mortgage loan are less than the outstanding principal balance and accrued interest of the loan and the cost of holding and disposing of the underlying property. The Company's mortgage loan securitizations are primarily non-recourse, thereby effectively transferring the risk of future credit losses to the purchasers of the securities issued by the trust. Securities and Banking and Special Asset Pool retains servicing for a limited number of its mortgage securitizations.

        The Company's Consumer business provides a wide range of mortgage loan products to its customers. Once originated, the Company often securitizes these loans through the use of QSPEs. These QSPEs are funded through the issuance of Trust Certificates backed solely by the transferred assets. These certificates have the same average life as the transferred assets. In addition to providing a source of liquidity and less expensive funding, securitizing these assets also reduces the Company's credit exposure to the borrowers. These mortgage loan securitizations are primarily non-recourse, thereby effectively transferring the risk of future credit losses to the purchasers of the securities issued by the trust. However, the Company generally retains the servicing rights and in certain instances retains investment securities, interest-only strips and residual interests in future cash flows from the trusts.

Mortgage Securitizations—Citicorp

        The following tables summarize selected cash flow information related to mortgage securitizations for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008:

 
 Three months ended
June 30, 2009
 Three months ended
June 30, 2008
 
In billions of dollars U.S. agency
sponsored
mortgages
 Non-agency
sponsored
mortgages
 Agency and non-agency
sponsored mortgages
 
Proceeds from new securitizations $4.5 $1.1 $1.2 
Contractual servicing fees received       
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows       
        

 
 Three months ended
September 30, 2009
 Three months ended
September 30, 2008
 
In billions of dollars U.S. agency
sponsoredp
mortgages
 Non-agency
sponsored
mortgages
 Agency and non-agency
sponsored mortgages
 

Proceeds from new securitizations

 $3.5 $1.5 $0.7 

Contractual servicing fees received

       

Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

       
        

 

 
 Six months ended
June 30, 2009
 Six months ended
June 30, 2008
 
In billions of dollars U.S. agency
sponsored
mortgages
 Non-agency
sponsored
mortgages
 Agency and non-agency
sponsored mortgages
 
Proceeds from new securitizations $5.3 $1.6 $3.2 
Contractual servicing fees received       
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows       

 
 Nine months ended
September 30, 2009
 Nine months ended
September 30, 2008
 
In billions of dollars U.S. agency
sponsoredp
mortgages
 Non-agency
sponsored
mortgages
 Agency and non-agency
sponsored mortgages
 

Proceeds from new securitizations

 $8.8 $3.2 $5.9 

Contractual servicing fees received

       

Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

      0.2 
        

        Gains (losses) recognized on the securitization of non-agency sponsored mortgage activity during the second quarter of 2009 was ($5) million. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, losses recognized on the securitization of non-agency sponsored mortgages were ($4) million.

        Losses recognized on the securitization of agency sponsored mortgage activity during the secondthird quarter of 2009 were ($10)$4 million. For the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, of 2009, losses recognized on the securitization of agency sponsored mortgages were ($7) million.

        There were no gains (losses) recognized on the securitization of agency and non-agency sponsored mortgages in the second quarter of 2008.were ($2) million and $21 million, respectively.

        Agency and non-agency securitization gains (losses) for the sixthree and nine months ended June30,September 30, 2008 were $4 million.$1 and ($14) million, respectively.


Table of Contents

        Key assumptions used in measuring the fair value of retained interests at the date of sale or securitization of mortgage receivables for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:

 
 Three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 Three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008
 
 U.S. agency
sponsored mortgages
 Non-agency
sponsored mortgages
 Agency and non-agency
sponsored mortgages

Discount rate

 0.7%2.6% to 24.0%43.3% 3.7%0.4% to 39.3%46.8% 2.7%4.6% to 34.9%53.8%

Constant prepayment rate

 21.7%1.2% to 45.5%45.6% 3.0%4.0% to 26.6%31.3% 2.0% to 28.4%23.2%

Anticipated net credit losses

  50.0%6.0% to 80.0%70.0% 20.0%25.0% to 100.0%80.0%

        The range in the key assumptions for retained interests in Securities and Banking is due to the different characteristics of the interests retained by the Company. The interests retained by Securities and Banking and Special Asset Pool range from highly rated and/or senior in the capital structure to unrated and/or residual interests.

        The effect of adverse changes of 10% and 20% in each of the key assumptions used to determine the fair value of retained interests is disclosed below. The negative effect of each change is calculated independently, holding all other assumptions constant. Because the key assumptions may not in fact be independent, the net effect of simultaneous adverse changes in the key assumptions may be less than the sum of the individual effects shown below.

        At JuneSeptember 30, 2009, the key assumptions used to value retained interests and the sensitivity of the fair value to adverse changes of 10% and 20% in each of the key assumptions were as follows:

 
 JuneSeptember 30, 2009
 
 U.S. agency
sponsored mortgages
 Non-agency
sponsored mortgages

Discount rate

 0.7%2.6% to 24.0%43.3% 3.7%0.4% to 39.3%46.8%

Constant prepayment rate

 21.7%1.2% to 45.5%45.6% 3.0%4.0% to 26.6%31.3%

Anticipated net credit losses

 NA 50.0%6.0% to 80.0%70.0%

 

In millions of dollars U.S. agency
sponsored mortgages
 Non-agency
sponsored mortgages
 
Carrying value of retained interests $1,149 $472 
      
Discount rates       
 Adverse change of 10% $(12)$(10)
 Adverse change of 20%  (24) (21)
Constant prepayment rate       
 Adverse change of 10% $(3)$(1)
 Adverse change of 20%  (5) (3)
Anticipated net credit losses       
 Adverse change of 10% $ $(11)
 Adverse change of 20%    (22)
      

In millions of dollars U.S. agency
sponsored mortgages
 Non-agency
sponsored mortgages
 

Carrying value of retained interests

 $396 $655 
      

Discount rates

       
 

Adverse change of 10%

 $(8)$(17)
 

Adverse change of 20%

  (15) (33)

Constant prepayment rate

       
 

Adverse change of 10%

 $(2)$(4)
 

Adverse change of 20%

  (4) (8)

Anticipated net credit losses

       
 

Adverse change of 10%

 $ $(32)
 

Adverse change of 20%

    (58)
      

Table of Contents

Mortgage Securitizations—Citi Holdings

        The following tables summarize selected cash flow information related to mortgage securitizations for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008:

 
 Three months ended June 30, 2009 Three months ended June 30, 2008 
In billions of dollars U.S. agency
sponsored mortgages
 Non-agency
sponsored mortgages
 Agency and non-agency
sponsored mortgages
 
Proceeds from new securitizations $25.0 $ $26.3 
Contractual servicing fees received  0.3    0.4 
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows  0.1    0.2 
        

 
 Three months ended September 30, 2009 Three months ended September 30, 2008 
In billions of dollars U.S. agency
sponsored mortgages
 Non-agency
sponsored mortgages
 Agency and non-agency
sponsored mortgages
 

Proceeds from new securitizations

 $15.9 $ $19.1 

Contractual servicing fees received

  0.3    0.4 

Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

  0.1    0.2 
        

 

 
 Six months ended June 30, 2009 Six months ended June 30, 2008 
In billions of dollars U.S. agency
sponsored mortgages
 Non-agency
sponsored mortgages
 Agency and non-agency
sponsored mortgages
 
Proceeds from new securitizations $45.1 $ $48.3 
Contractual servicing fees received  0.7    0.7 
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows  0.2  0.1  0.5 
        


 
 Nine months ended September 30, 2009 Nine months ended September 30, 2008 
In billions of dollars U.S. agency
sponsored mortgages
 Non-agency
sponsored mortgages
 Agency and non-agency
sponsored mortgages
 

Proceeds from new securitizations

 $61.0 $ $65.5 

Contractual servicing fees received

  1.0    1.1 

Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

  0.3  0.1  0.6 
        

Table of Contents

        The Company did not recognize gains (losses) on the securitization of U.S. agency and non-agency sponsored mortgages in the secondthird quarter of 2009, as well as the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009. There were gains (losses) from the securitization of agency and non-agency sponsored mortgages of $55($81) million and $57($4) million in the secondthird quarter of 2008 and the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, respectively.

        Key assumptions used in measuring the fair value of retained interests at the date of sale or securitization of mortgage receivables for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:

 
 Three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 Three months ended June 30, 2008September 30,2008
 
 U.S. agency
sponsored mortgages
 Non-agency
sponsored mortgages
 Agency and non-agency
sponsored mortgages

Discount rate

 7.9%11.7% to 8.6%12.0% NA 12.4%10.8% to 15.3%

Constant prepayment rate

 2.8%3.7% to 5.1%4.2% NA 3.6%4.7% to 6.1%8.0%

Anticipated net credit losses

  NA 

Table of Contents

        The range in the key assumptions for Special Asset Poolthe retained interests in Special Asset Pool is due to the different characteristics of the interests retained by the Company. The interests retained by Securities and Banking range from highly rated and/or senior in the capital structure to unrated and/or residual interests.

        The effect of adverse changes of 10% and 20% in each of the key assumptions used to determine the fair value of retained interests is disclosed below. The negative effect of each change is calculated independently, holding all other assumptions constant. Because the key assumptions may not in fact be independent, the net effect of simultaneous adverse changes in the key assumptions may be less than the sum of the individual effects shown below.

        At JuneSeptember 30, 2009, the key assumptions used to value retained interests and the sensitivity of the fair value to adverse changes of 10% and 20% in each of the key assumptions were as follows:

 
 JuneSeptember 30, 2009
 
 U.S. agency
sponsored mortgages
 Non-agency
sponsored mortgages

Discount rate

 11.8%13.1% 3.7%0.4% to 39.3%41.3%

Constant prepayment rate

 14.9%14.4% 3.0%4.0% to 27.7%33.6%

Anticipated net credit losses

 0.1% 0.3% to 65.0%70.0%

Weighted average life

 0.5 to 6.26.0 years 0.1 to 8.77.8 years

 

In millions of dollars U.S. agency
sponsored mortgages
 Non-agency
sponsored mortgages
 
Carrying value of retained interests $7,205 $1,092 
      
Discount rates       
 Adverse change of 10% $(233)$(53)
 Adverse change of 20%  (451) (103)
Constant prepayment rate       
 Adverse change of 10% $(387)$(56)
 Adverse change of 20%  (744) (109)
Anticipated net credit losses       
 Adverse change of 10% $(35)$(46)
 Adverse change of 20%  (71) (91)
      

In millions of dollars U.S. agency
sponsored mortgages
 Non-agency
sponsored mortgages
 

Carrying value of retained interests

 $6,037 $1,011 
      

Discount rates

       
 

Adverse change of 10%

 $(201)$(41)
 

Adverse change of 20%

  (388) (79)

Constant prepayment rate

       
 

Adverse change of 10%

 $(361)$(51)
 

Adverse change of 20%

  (693) (96)

Anticipated net credit losses

       
 

Adverse change of 10%

 $(19)$(44)
 

Adverse change of 20%

  (37) (86)
      

Mortgage Servicing Rights

        The fair value of capitalized mortgage loan servicing rights (MSR) was $6.7$6.2 billion and $8.9$8.3 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The MSRs correspond to principal loan balances of $586$577 billion and $578$648 billion as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The following table summarizes the changes in capitalized MSRs for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008:

 
 Three Months Ended June 30, 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 
Balance, at March 31 $5,481 $7,716 
Originations  391  424 
Purchases     
Changes in fair value of MSRs due to changes in inputs and assumptions  1,343  1,066 
Transfer to Trading account assets    (59)
Other changes(1)  (445) (213)
      
Balance, at June 30 $6,770 $8,934 
      

 
 Three Months Ended September 30, 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

Balance, at June 30

 $6,770 $8,934 

Originations

  267  297 

Purchases

     

Changes in fair value of MSRs due to changes in inputs and assumptions

  (490) (595)

Transfer toTrading account assets

     

Other changes(1)

  (319) (290)
      

Balance, at September 30

 $6,228 $8,346 
      

 

 
 Six Months Ended June 30, 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 
Balance, at December 31 $5,657 $8,380 
Originations  626  769 
Purchases    1 
Changes in fair value of MSRs due to changes in inputs and assumptions  1,517  505 
Transfer to Trading account assets    (163)
Other changes(1)  (1,030) (558)
      
Balance, at June 30 $6,770 $8,934 
      

 
 Nine Months Ended September 30, 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

Balance, beginning of period

 $5,657 $8,380 

Originations

  893  1,066 

Purchases

    1 

Changes in fair value of MSRs due to changes in inputs and assumptions

  1,027  (90)

Transfer toTrading account assets

    (163)

Other changes(1)

  (1,349) (848)
      

Balance, end of period

 $6,228 $8,346 
      

(1)
Represents changes due to customer payments and passage of time.

        The market for MSRs is not sufficiently liquid to provide participants with quoted market prices. Therefore, the Company uses an option-adjusted spread valuation approach to determine the fair value of MSRs. This approach consists of projecting servicing cash flows under multiple interest rate scenarios and discounting these cash flows using risk-adjusted discount rates. The key assumptions used in the valuation of MSRs include mortgage prepayment speeds and discount rates. The model assumptions and the MSRs' fair value


Table of Contents

estimates are compared to observable trades of similar MSR portfolios and interest-only security portfolios, as available, as well as to MSR broker valuations and industry surveys. The cash flow model and underlying prepayment and interest rate models used to value these MSRs are subject to validation in accordance with the Company's model validation policies.

        The fair value of the MSRs is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates. In managing this risk, the Company economically hedges a significant portion of the value of its MSRs through the use of interest rate derivative contracts, forward purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities and purchased securities classified as trading.


Table of Contents

        The Company receives fees during the course of servicing previously securitized mortgages. The amount of these fees for the months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:

 
 Three months ended, Six months ended, 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 
Servicing fees $429 $420 $858 $831 
Late fees  23  24  48  50 
Ancillary fees  22  17  42  35 
          
Total MSR fees $474 $461 $948 $916 
          

 
 Three months ended, Nine months ended, 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Servicing fees

 $397 $429 $1,255 $1,261 

Late fees

  23  25  71  75 

Ancillary fees

  18  16  60  50 
          

Total MSR fees

 $438 $470 $1,386 $1,386 
          

        These fees are classified in the Consolidated Statement of Income asCommissions and fees.

Student Loan Securitizations

        Through the Company's Local Consumer Lending business within Citi Holdings, the Company maintains programs to securitize certain portfolios of student loan assets. Under these securitization programs, transactions qualifying as sales are off-balance sheet transactions in which the loans are removed from the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company and sold to a QSPE. These QSPEs are funded through the issuance of pass-through term notes collateralized solely by the trust assets. For these off-balance sheet securitizations, the Company generally retains interests in the form of subordinated residual interests (i.e., interest-only strips) and servicing rights.

        Under terms of the trust arrangements, the Company has no obligations to provide financial support and has not provided such support. A substantial portion of the credit risk associated with the securitized loans has been transferred to third-party guarantors or insurers either under the Federal Family Education Loan Program, authorized by the U.S. Department of Education under the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended, or private credit insurance.

        The following tables summarize selected cash flow information related to student loan securitizations for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008:

 
 Three months ended 
In billions of dollars June 30,
2009
 June 30,
2008
 
Proceeds from new securitizations $ $2.0 
Proceeds from collections reinvested in new receivables     
Contractual servicing fees received     
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows    0.1 
      


Three months ended
In billions of dollarsSeptember 30,
2009
September 30,
2008

Proceeds from new securitizations

$$

Proceeds from collections reinvested in new receivables

Contractual servicing fees received

Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

 

 
 Six months ended 
In billions of dollars June 30,
2009
 June 30,
2008
 
Proceeds from new securitizations $ $2.0 
Proceeds from collections reinvested in new receivables     
Contractual servicing fees received     
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows  0.1  0.1 
      

 
 Nine months ended 
In billions of dollars September 30,
2009
 September 30,
2008
 

Proceeds from new securitizations

 $ $2.0 

Proceeds from collections reinvested in new receivables

     

Contractual servicing fees received

  0.1  0.1 

Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

  0.1  0.1 
      

        The Company did not recognize any gains or losses during the third quarters of 2009 and 2008. The company recognized a gain of $1 million during the 9 months ended September 30, 2008.

        Key assumptions used in measuring the fair value of the residual interest at the date of sale or securitization of Citi Holding's student loan receivables for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, are as follows:

 
 JuneSeptember 30,
2009
 JuneSeptember 30,
2008

Discount rate

 NA 5.8%11.1% to 13.6%14.1%

Constant prepayment rate

 NA 1.2%1.1% to 11.6%9.9%

Anticipated net credit losses

 NA 0.3% to 0.9%

        At JuneSeptember 30, 2009, the key assumptions used to value retained interests and the sensitivity of the fair value to adverse changes of 10% and 20% in each of the key assumptions were as follows:

 
 Retained interests

Discount rate

 5.2%10.8% to 16.6%16.3%

Constant prepayment rate

0.4% to 6.5%
Anticipated net credit losses

 0.2% to 5.2%

Anticipated net credit losses

0.3% to 0.7%

Weighted average life

 4.04.1 to 10.210.4 years

 

In millions of dollars Retained interests 
Carrying value of retained interests $977 
Discount rates    
 Adverse change of 10% $(29)
 Adverse change of 20%  (56)
Constant prepayment rate    
 Adverse change of 10% $(5)
 Adverse change of 20%  (11)
Anticipated net credit losses    
 Adverse change of 10% $(5)
 Adverse change of 20%  (10)
    

In millions of dollars Retained interests 

Carrying value of retained interests

 $1,045 

Discount rates

    
 

Adverse change of 10%

 $(29)
 

Adverse change of 20%

  (55)

Constant prepayment rate

    
 

Adverse change of 10%

 $(4)
 

Adverse change of 20%

  (9)

Anticipated net credit losses

    
 

Adverse change of 10%

 $(5)
 

Adverse change of 20%

  (10)
    

Table of Contents

On-Balance Sheet Securitizations—Citi Holdings

        The Company engages in on-balance sheet securitizations. These are securitizations that do not qualify for sales treatment; thus, the assets remain on the Company's balance sheet. The following table presents the carrying amounts and classification of consolidated assets and liabilities transferred in transactions from the Consumer credit card, student loan, mortgage and auto businesses, accounted for as secured borrowings:

In billions of dollars June 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 
Cash $0.2 $0.3 
Available-for-sale securities  0.1  0.1 
Loans  17.7  7.5 
Allowance for loan losses  (0.2) (0.1)
Other  0.5   
      
Total assets $18.3 $7.8 
      
Long-term debt $13.7 $6.3 
Other liabilities  0.1  0.3 
      
Total liabilities $13.8 $6.6 
      

In billions of dollars September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

Cash

 $0.7 $0.3 

Available-for-sale securities

  0.1  0.1 

Loans

  21.8  7.5 

Allowance for loan losses

  (0.2) (0.1)

Other

  1.0   
      

Total assets

 $23.4 $7.8 
      

Long-term debt

 $17.2 $6.3 

Other liabilities

  3.9  0.3 
      

Total liabilities

 $21.1 $6.6 
      

        All assets are restricted from being sold or pledged as collateral. The cash flows from these assets are the only source used to pay down the associated liabilities, which are non-recourse to the Company's general assets.

Citi-Administered Asset-Backed Commercial Paper Conduits

        The Company is active in the asset-backed commercial paper conduit business as administrator of several multi-seller commercial paper conduits, and also as a service provider to single-seller and other commercial paper conduits sponsored by third parties.

        The multi-seller commercial paper conduits are designed to provide the Company's customers access to low-cost funding in the commercial paper markets. The conduits purchase assets from or provide financing facilities to customers and are funded by issuing commercial paper to third-party investors. The conduits generally do not purchase assets originated by the Company. The funding of the conduit is facilitated by the liquidity support and credit enhancements provided by the Company.

        As administrator to the conduits, the Company is responsible for selecting and structuring of assets purchased or financed by the conduits, making decisions regarding the funding of the conduits, including determining the tenor and other features of the commercial paper issued, monitoring the quality and performance of the conduits' assets, and facilitating the operations and cash flows of the conduits. In return, the Company earns structuring fees from customers for individual transactions and earns an administration fee from the conduit, which is equal to the income from client program and liquidity fees of the conduit after payment of interest costs and other fees. This administration fee is fairly stable, since most risks and rewards of the underlying assets are passed back to the customers and, once the asset pricing is negotiated, most ongoing income, costs and fees are relatively stable as a percentage of the conduit's size.

        The conduits administered by the Company do not generally invest in liquid securities that are formally rated by third parties. The assets are privately negotiated and structured transactions that are designed to be held by the conduit, rather than actively traded and sold. The yield earned by the conduit on each asset is generally tied to the rate on the commercial paper issued by the conduit, thus passing interest rate risk to the client. Each asset purchased by the conduit is structured with transaction-specific credit enhancement features provided by the third-party seller, including over-collateralization, cash and excess spread collateral accounts, direct recourse or third-party guarantees. These credit enhancements are sized with the objective of approximating a credit rating of A or above, based on the Company's internal risk ratings.

        Substantially all of the funding of the conduits is in the form of short-term commercial paper, with a weighted average life generally ranging from 30-45 days. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the weighted average life of the commercial paper issued was approximately 3647 and 37 days, respectively. In addition, the conduits have issued subordinate loss notes and equity with a notional amount of approximately $78$76 million and varying remaining tenors ranging from one10 month to six6 years.

        The primary credit enhancement provided to the conduit investors is in the form of transaction-specific credit enhancement described above. In addition, there are generally two additional forms of credit enhancement that protect the commercial paper investors from defaulting assets. First, the subordinate loss notes issued by each conduit absorb any credit losses up to their full notional amount. It is expected that the subordinate loss notes issued by each unconsolidated conduit are sufficient to absorb a majority of the expected losses from each conduit, thereby making the single investor in the Subordinate Loss Notesubordinate loss note the primary beneficiary under FIN 46(R)(ASC 810-10-25).beneficiary. Second, each conduit has obtained a letter of credit from the Company, which is generally 8-10% of the conduit's assets. The letters of credit provided by the Company total approximately $4.2$3.7 billion and are included in the Company's maximum exposure to loss. The net result across all multi-seller conduits administered by the Company is that, in the event defaulted assets exceed the transaction-specific credit enhancement described above, any losses in each conduit are allocated in the following order:

    Subordinatesubordinate loss note holders,

    the Company, and

    the commercial paper investors.

        The Company also provides the conduits with two forms of liquidity agreements that are used to provide funding to the conduits in the event of a market disruption, among other events. Each asset of the conduit is supported by a transaction-specific liquidity facility in the form of an asset purchase agreement (APA). Under the APA, the Company has agreed to purchase non-defaulted eligible receivables from the conduit at par. Any assets purchased under the APA are subject to increased pricing. The APA is not designed to provide credit support to the conduit, as it generally does not permit the purchase of defaulted or impaired assets and generally reprices the assets purchased to consider potential increased credit risk.


Table of Contents

the assets purchased to consider potential increased credit risk. The APA covers all assets in the conduits and is considered in the Company's maximum exposure to loss. In addition, the Company provides the conduits with program-wide liquidity in the form of short-term lending commitments. Under these commitments, the Company has agreed to lend to the conduits in the event of a short-term disruption in the commercial paper market, subject to specified conditions. The total notional exposure under the program-wide liquidity agreement is $11.8$11.3 billion and is considered in the Company's maximum exposure to loss. The Company receives fees for providing both types of liquidity agreement and considers these fees to be on fair market terms.

        Finally, the Company is one of several named dealers in the commercial paper issued by the conduits and earns a market-based fee for providing such services. Along with third-party dealers, the Company makes a market in the commercial paper and may from time to time fund commercial paper pending sale to a third party. On specific dates with less liquidity in the market, the Company may hold in inventory commercial paper issued by conduits administered by the Company, as well as conduits administered by third parties. The amount of commercial paper issued by its administered conduits held in inventory fluctuates based on market conditions and activity. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2009, the Company owned approximately $0.2 billion$109 million of the commercial paper issued by its administered conduits.

        FIN 46(R)(ASC 810-10-25) requires that theThe Company is required to quantitatively analyze the expected variability of the conduit to determine whether the Company is the primary beneficiary of the conduit. The Company performs this analysis on a quarterly basis. For conduits where the subordinate loss notes or third partythird-party guarantees are sufficient to absorb a majority of the expected loss of the conduit, the Company does not consolidate. In circumstances where the subordinate loss notes or third partythird-party guarantees are insufficient to absorb a majority of the expected loss, the Company consolidates the conduit as its primary beneficiary due to the additional credit enhancement provided by the Company. In conducting this analysis, the Company considers three primary sources of variability in the conduit: credit risk, interest-rate risk and fee variability.

        The Company models the credit risk of the conduit's assets using a Credit Value at Risk (C-VaR)(C-VAR) model. The C-VaRC-VAR model considers changes in credit spreads (both within a rating class as well as due to rating upgrades and downgrades), name-specific changes in credit spreads, credit defaults and recovery rates and diversification effects of pools of financial assets. The model incorporates data from independent rating agencies as well as the Company's own proprietary information regarding spread changes, ratings transitions and losses given default. Using this credit data, a Monte Carlo simulation is performed to develop a distribution of credit risk for the portfolio of assets owned by each conduit, which is then applied on a probability-weighted basis to determine expected losses due to credit risk. In addition, the Company continuously monitors the specific credit characteristics of the conduit's assets and the current credit environment to confirm that the C-VaRC-VAR model used continues to incorporate the Company's best information regarding the expected credit risk of the conduit's assets.

        The Company also analyzes the variability in the fees that it earns from the conduit using monthly actual historical cash flow data to determine average fee and standard deviation measures for each conduit. Because any unhedged interest rate and foreign-currency risk not contractually passed on to customers is absorbed by the fees earned by the Company, the fee variability analysis incorporates those risks.

        The fee variability and credit risk variability are then combined into a single distribution of the conduit's overall returns. This return distribution is updated and analyzed on at least a quarterly basis to ensure that the amount of the subordinate loss notes issued to third parties is sufficient to absorb greater than 50% of the total expected variability in the conduit's returns. The expected variability absorbed by the subordinate loss note investors is therefore measured to be greater than the expected variability absorbed by the Company through its liquidity arrangements and other fees earned, and the investors in commercial paper and medium-term notes. While the notional amounts of the subordinate loss notes are quantitatively small compared to the size of the conduits, this is reflective of the fact that most of the substantive risks of the conduits are absorbed by the enhancements provided by the sellers (customers) and other third parties that provide transaction-level credit enhancement. Because FIN 46(R) (ASC 810-10-25) generally requires these risks and related enhancements are generally required to be excluded from the analysis, the remaining risks and expected variability are quantitatively small. The calculation of variability under FIN 46(R)(ASC 810-10-25) focuses primarily onexpected variability, rather than the risks associated with extreme outcomes (for example, large levels of default) that are expected to occur very infrequently. So while the subordinate loss notes are sized appropriately compared to expected losses, as measured in FIN 46(R)(ASC 810-10-25), they do not provide significant protection against extreme or unusual credit losses. Where such credit losses occur or become expected to occur, the Company would consolidate the conduit due to the additional credit enhancement provided by the Company.

Third-Party Commercial Paper Conduits

        The Company also provides liquidity facilities to single- and multi-seller conduits sponsored by third parties. These conduits are independently owned and managed and invest in a variety of asset classes, depending on the nature of the conduit. The facilities provided by the Company typically represent a small portion of the total liquidity facilities obtained by each conduit, and are collateralized by the assets of each conduit. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2009, the notional amount of these facilities was approximately $1 billion$903 million and $301$298 million was funded under these facilities.

Collateralized Debt and Loan Obligations

        A collateralized debt obligation (CDO) is an SPE that purchases a pool of assets consisting of asset-backed securities and synthetic exposures through derivatives on asset-backed securities and issues multiple tranches of equity and notes to investors. A third-party manager is typically retained by the CDO to select the pool of assets and manage those assets over


Table of Contents

the term of the CDO. The Company earns fees for


Table of Contents

warehousing assets prior to the creation of a CDO, structuring CDOs and placing debt securities with investors. In addition, the Company has retained interests in many of the CDOs it has structured and makes a market in those issued notes.

        A cash CDO, or arbitrage CDO, is a CDO designed to take advantage of the difference between the yield on a portfolio of selected assets, typically residential mortgage-backed securities, and the cost of funding the CDO through the sale of notes to investors. "Cash flow" CDOs are vehicles in which the CDO passes on cash flows from a pool of assets, while "market value" CDOs pay to investors the market value of the pool of assets owned by the CDO at maturity. Both types of CDOs are typically managed by a third-party asset manager. In these transactions, all of the equity and notes issued by the CDO are funded, as the cash is needed to purchase the debt securities. In a typical cash CDO, a third-party investment manager selects a portfolio of assets, which the Company funds through a warehouse financing arrangement prior to the creation of the CDO. The Company then sells the debt securities to the CDO in exchange for cash raised through the issuance of notes. The Company's continuing involvement in cash CDOs is typically limited to investing in a portion of the notes or loans issued by the CDO and making a market in those securities, and acting as derivative counterparty for interest rate or foreign currency swaps used in the structuring of the CDO.

        A synthetic CDO is similar to a cash CDO, except that the CDO obtains exposure to all or a portion of the referenced assets synthetically through derivative instruments, such as credit default swaps. Because the CDO does not need to raise cash sufficient to purchase the entire referenced portfolio, a substantial portion of the senior tranches of risk is typically passed on to CDO investors in the form of unfunded liabilities or derivative instruments. Thus, the CDO writes credit protection on select referenced debt securities to the Company or third parties and the risk is then passed on to the CDO investors in the form of funded notes or purchased credit protection through derivative instruments. Any cash raised from investors is invested in a portfolio of collateral securities or investment contracts. The collateral is then used to support the CDO's obligations on the credit default swaps written to counterparties. The Company's continuing involvement in synthetic CDOs generally includes purchasing credit protection through credit default swaps with the CDO, owning a portion of the capital structure of the CDO, in the form of both unfunded derivative positions (primarily super senior exposures discussed below) and funded notes, entering into interest-rate swap and total-return swap transactions with the CDO, lending to the CDO, and making a market in those funded notes.

        A collateralized loan obligation (CLO) is substantially similar to the CDO transactions described above, except that the assets owned by the SPE (either cash instruments or synthetic exposures through derivative instruments) are corporate loans and to a lesser extent corporate bonds, rather than asset-backed debt securities.

Consolidation

        The Company has retained significant portions of the "super senior" positions issued by certain CDOs. These positions are referred to as "super senior" because they represent the most senior positions in the CDO and, at the time of structuring, were senior to tranches rated AAA by independent rating agencies. These positions include facilities structured in the form of short-term commercial paper, where the Company wrote put options ("liquidity puts") to certain CDOs. Under the terms of the liquidity puts, if the CDO was unable to issue commercial paper at a rate below a specified maximum (generally LIBOR + 35bps35 bps to LIBOR + 40 bps), the Company was obligated to fund the senior tranche of the CDO at a specified interest rate. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2009, the Company had purchased all $25 billion of the commercial paper subject to these liquidity puts.

        Since inception of many CDO transactions, the subordinate tranches of the CDOs have diminished significantly in value and in rating. The declines in value of the subordinate tranches and in the super senior tranches indicate that the super senior tranches are now exposed to a significant portion of the expected losses of the CDOs, based on current market assumptions. The Company evaluates these transactions for consolidation when reconsideration events occur, as defined in FIN 46(R) (ASC 810-10-25).occur.

        Upon a reconsideration event, the Company is at risk for consolidation only if the Company owns a majority of either a single tranche or a group of tranches that absorb the remaining risk of the CDO. Due to reconsideration events during 2007 and 2008, the Company has consolidated 30 of the 46 CDOs/CLOs in which the Company holds a majority of the senior interests of the transaction.

        The Company continues to monitor its involvement in unconsolidated VIEs and if the Company were to acquire additional interests in these vehicles or if the CDOs' contractual arrangements were to be changed to reallocate expected losses or residual returns among the various interest holders, the Company may be required to consolidate the CDOs. For cash CDOs, the net result of such consolidation would be to gross up the Company's balance sheet by the current fair value of the subordinate securities held by third parties, which amounts are not considered material. For synthetic CDOs, the net result of such consolidation may reduce the Company's balance sheet by eliminating intercompany derivative receivables and payables in consolidation.


Table of Contents

Cash Flows and Retained Interests—CiticorpCiti Holdings

        The following tables summarize selected cash flow information related to CDO and CLO securitizations for the three and nine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009:

 
 Three months ended
JuneSeptember 30, 2009
 
In billions of dollars CDOs CLOs 

Cash flows received on retained interests

     
      

 

 
 SixNine months ended
JuneSeptember 30, 2009
 
In billions of dollars CDOs CLOs 

Cash flows received on retained interests

     
      

        The key assumptions, used for the securitization of CDOs and CLOs during the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009, in measuring the fair value of retained interests at the date of sale or securitization, are as follows:

 
 CDOs CLOs

Discount rate

 N/A36.4% to 39.7% 13.5%5.7% to 14.8%
6.3%

        The effect of two negative changes in discount rates used to determine the fair value of retained interests is disclosed below.

In millions of dollars CDOs CLOs 
Carrying value of retained interests NA $168 
Discount rates      
 Adverse change of 10% NA $(3)
 Adverse change of 20% NA  (6)
      

Cash Flows and Retained Interests—Citi Holdings

        The following tables summarize selected cash flow information related to CDO and CLO securitizations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009:


Three months ended
June 30, 2009
In billions of dollarsCDOsCLOs
Cash flows received on retained interests



Six months ended
June 30, 2009
In billions of dollarsCDOsCLOs
Cash flows received on retained interests

        The key assumptions, used for the securitization of CDOs and CLOs during the three months ended June 30, 2009, in measuring the fair value of retained interests at the date of sale or securitization, are as follows:


CDOsCLOs
Discount rate36.4% to 39.7%4.3% to 4.8%

        The effect of two negative changes in discount rates used to determine the fair value of retained interests is disclosed below.

In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars CDOs CLOs In millions of dollars CDOs CLOs 
Carrying value of retained interestsCarrying value of retained interests $273 $702 

Carrying value of retained interests

 $251 $709 
Discount ratesDiscount rates 

Discount rates

 
Adverse change of 10% $(26)$(11)

Adverse change of 10%

 $(24)$(11)
Adverse change of 20% (49) (23)

Adverse change of 20%

 (47) (23)
           

Asset-Based Financing—Citicorp

        The Company provides loans and other forms of financing to VIEs that hold assets. Those loans are subject to the same credit approvals as all other loans originated or purchased by the Company. Financings in the form of debt securities or derivatives are, in most circumstances, reported inTrading account assets and accounted for at fair value through earnings.

        The primary types of Citicorp's asset-based financing, total assets of the unconsolidated VIEs with significant involvement and the Company's maximum exposure to loss at JuneSeptember 30, 2009 are shown below. For the Company to realize that maximum loss, the VIE (borrower) would have to default with no recovery from the assets held by the VIE.

In billions of dollars
Type
 Total
assets
 Maximum
exposure
 
Commercial and other real estate $1.0 $ 
Hedge funds and equities  5.4  3.0 
Corporate loans     
Airplanes, ships and other assets  7.3  0.9 
      
Total $13.7 $3.9 
      

In billions of dollars
Type
 Total
assets
 Maximum
exposure
 

Commercial and other real estate

 $0.6 $ 

Hedge funds and equities

  5.8  3.1 

Airplanes, ships and other assets

  11.9  2.1 
      

Total

 $18.3 $5.2 
      

Asset-Based Financing—Citi Holdings

        The Company provides loans and other forms of financing to VIEs that hold assets. Those loans are subject to the same credit approvals as all other loans originated or purchased by the Company. Financings in the form of debt securities or derivatives are, in most circumstances, reported inTrading account assets and accounted for at fair value through earnings.

        The primary types of Citi Holdings' asset-based financing, total assets of the unconsolidated VIEs with significant involvement and the Company's maximum exposure to loss at JuneSeptember 30, 2009 are shown below. For the Company to realize that maximum loss, the VIE (borrower) would have to default with no recovery from the assets held by the VIE.

In billions of dollars
Type
 Total
assets
 Maximum
exposure
 
Commercial and other real estate $45.4 $8.9 
Hedge funds and equities  3.2  1.8 
Corporate loans  7.8  6.6 
Airplanes, ships and other assets  2.1  1.5 
      
Total $58.5 $18.8 
      


In billions of dollars
Type
 Total
assets
 Maximum
exposure
 

Commercial and other real estate

 $36.9 $7.0 

Hedge funds and equities

  2.2  0.8 

Corporate loans

  7.9  6.7 

Airplanes, ships and other assets

  6.0  3.4 
      

Total

 $53.0 $17.9 
      

Table of Contents

        The following table summarizes selected cash flow information related to asset-based financing for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008:

 
 Three months ended June 30, 
In billions of dollars 2009 2008 
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows $0.1 $ 
      

 
 Three months ended
September 30,
 
In billions of dollars 2009 2008 

Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

 $0.4 $ 
      

 

 
 Six months ended June 30, 
In billions of dollars 2009 2008 
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows $2.0 $ 
      

 
 Nine months ended
September 30,
 
In billions of dollars 2009 2008 

Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

 $2.4 $ 
      

        The effect of two negative changes in discount rates used to determine the fair value of retained interests is disclosed below.

In millions of dollars Asset based financing 

Carrying value of retained interests

 $6,297 

Value of underlying portfolio

    
 

Adverse change of 10%

 $(584)
 

Adverse change of 20%

  (1,215)
    

In millions of dollars Asset based financing 

Carrying value of retained interests

 $6,882 

Value of underlying portfolio

    
 

Adverse change of 10%

 $ 
 

Adverse change of 20%

  (436)
    

Table of Contents

Municipal Securities Tender Option Bond (TOB) Trusts

        The Company sponsors TOB trusts that hold fixed- and floating-rate, tax-exempt securities issued by state or local municipalities. The trusts are typically single-issuer trusts whose assets are purchased from the Company and from the secondary market. The trusts issue long-term senior floating rate notes (Floaters) and junior residual securities (Residuals). The Floaters have a long-term rating based on the long-term rating of the underlying municipal bond and a short-term rating based on that of the liquidity provider to the trust. The Residuals are generally rated based on the long-term rating of the underlying municipal bond and entitle the holder to the residual cash flows from the issuing trust.

        The Company sponsors three kinds of TOB trusts: customer TOB trusts, proprietary TOB trusts and QSPE TOB trusts.

    Customer TOB trusts are trusts through which customers finance investments in municipal securities and are not consolidated by the Company. Proprietary and QSPE TOB trusts, on the other hand, provide the Company with the ability to finance its own investments in municipal securities.

    Proprietary TOB trusts are generally consolidated, in which case the financing (the Floaters) is recognized on the Company's balance sheet as a liability. However, certain proprietary TOB trusts are not consolidated by the Company, where the Residuals are held by hedge funds that are consolidated and managed by the Company. The assets and the associated liabilities of these TOB trusts are not consolidated by the hedge funds (and, thus, are not consolidated by the Company) under the application of the AICPA ASC 946,Financial Services—Investment Company Audit Guide,Companies, which precludes consolidation of owned investments. The Company consolidates the hedge funds, because the Company holds controlling financial interests in the hedge funds. Certain of the Company's equity investments in the hedge funds are hedged with derivatives transactions executed by the Company with third parties referencing the returns of the hedge fund.

    QSPE TOB trusts provide the Company with the same exposure as proprietary TOB trusts and are not consolidated by the Company.

        Credit rating distribution is based on the external rating of the municipal bonds within the TOB trusts, including any credit enhancement provided by monoline insurance companies or the Company in the primary or secondary markets, as discussed below. The total assets for proprietary TOB Trusts (consolidated and non-consolidated) includes $0.7$0.8 billion of assets where the Residuals are held by a hedge fund that is consolidated and managed by the Company.

        The TOB trusts fund the purchase of their assets by issuing Floaters along with Residuals, which are frequently less than 1% of a trust's total funding. The tenor of the Floaters matches the maturity of the TOB trust and is equal to or shorter than the tenor of the municipal bond held by the trust, and the Floaters bear interest rates that are typically reset weekly to a new market rate (based on the SIFMA index). Floater holders have an option to tender the Floaters they hold back to the trust periodically. Customer TOB trusts issue the Floaters and Residuals to third parties. Proprietary and QSPE TOB trusts issue the Floaters to third parties and the Residuals are held by the Company.

        Approximately $3.1$2.2 billion of the municipal bonds owned by TOB trusts have an additional credit guarantee provided by the Company. In all other cases, the assets are either unenhanced or are insured with a monoline insurance provider in the primary market or in the secondary market. While the trusts have not encountered any adverse credit events as defined in the underlying trust agreements, certain monoline insurance companies have experienced downgrades. In these cases, the Company has proactively managed the TOB programs by applying additional secondary market insurance on the assets or proceeding with orderly unwinds of the trusts.

        The Company, in its capacity as remarketing agent, facilitates the sale of the Floaters to third parties at inception of the trust and facilitates the reset of the Floater coupon and tenders of Floaters. If Floaters are tendered and the Company (in its role as remarketing agent) is unable to find a new investor within a specified period of time, it can declare a failed remarketing (in which case the trust is unwound) or may choose to buy the Floaters into its own inventory and may continue to try to sell it to a third-party investor. While the level of the Company's inventory of Floaters fluctuates, the Company held approximately $0.4 billionnone of the Floater inventory related to the Customer, Proprietary and QSPE TOB programs as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009.

        If a trust is unwound early due to an event other than a credit event on the underlying municipal bond, the underlying municipal bond is sold in the secondary market. If there is an accompanying shortfall in the trust's cash flows to fund the redemption of the Floaters after the sale of the underlying


Table of Contents

municipal bond, the trust draws on a liquidity agreement in an amount equal to the shortfall. Liquidity agreements are generally provided to the trust directly by the Company. For customer TOBs where the Residual is less than 25% of the trust's capital structure, the Company has a reimbursement agreement with the Residual holder under which the Residual holder reimburses the Company for any payment made under the liquidity arrangement. Through this reimbursement agreement, the Residual holder remains economically exposed to fluctuations in value of the municipal bond. These reimbursement agreements are actively margined based on changes in value of the underlying municipal bond to mitigate the Company's counterparty credit risk. In cases where a third party provides liquidity to a proprietary or QSPE TOB trust, a similar reimbursement arrangement is made whereby the Company (or a consolidated subsidiary of the Company) as Residual holder absorbs any losses incurred by the liquidity provider. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2009, liquidity agreements provided with respect to customer TOB trusts totaled $6.5$6.1 billion, offset by reimbursement agreements in place with a notional amount of $4.9$4.6 billion. The remaining exposure relates to TOB transactions where the Residual owned by the customer is at least 25% of the bond value at the inception of the transaction. In addition, the Company has provided


Table of Contents

liquidity arrangements with a notional amount of $0.9$0.2 billion to QSPE TOB trusts and other non-consolidated proprietary TOB trusts described above.

        The Company considers the customer and proprietary TOB trusts (excluding QSPE TOB trusts) to be VIEs within the scope of FIN 46(R) (ASC 810-10-15).VIEs. Because third-party investors hold the Residual and Floater interests in the customer TOB trusts, the Company's involvement and variable interests include only its role as remarketing agent and liquidity provider. On the basis of the variability absorbed by the customer through the reimbursement arrangement or significant residual investment, the Company does not consolidate the Customer TOB trusts. The Company's variable interests in the Proprietary TOB trusts include the Residual as well as the remarking and liquidity agreements with the trusts. On the basis of the variability absorbed through these contracts (primarily the Residual), the Company generally consolidates the Proprietary TOB trusts. Finally, certain proprietary TOB trusts and QSPE TOB trusts are not consolidated by application of specific accounting literature. For the nonconsolidated proprietary TOB trusts and QSPE TOB trusts, the Company recognizes only its residual investment on its balance sheet at fair value and the third-party financing raised by the trusts is off-balance sheet.

        The following table summarizes selected cash flow information related to Citicorp's municipal bond securitizations for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008:

 
 Three months ended June 30, 
In billions of dollars 2009 2008 
Proceeds from new securitizations $0.2 $0.5 
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows $0.6 $0.2 
      

 
 Three months ended
September 30,
 
In billions of dollars 2009 2008 

Proceeds from new securitizations

 $0.1 $0.6 

Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

 $0.1 $0.1 
      

 

 
 Six months ended June 30, 
In billions of dollars
 2009 2008 
Proceeds from new securitizations $0.2 $0.5 
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows $0.6 $0.3 
      

 
 Nine months ended
September 30,
 
In billions of dollars 2009 2008 

Proceeds from new securitizations

 $0.3 $1.1 

Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

 $0.7 $0.4 
      

        The following table summarizes selected cash flow information related to Citi Holdings' municipal bond securitizations for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008:

 
 Three months ended June
September 30,
 
In billions of dollars
 2009 2008 

Proceeds from new securitizations

 $ $ 

Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

 $ $ 
      

 

 
 Six months ended June 30, 
In billions of dollars
 2009 2008 
Proceeds from new securitizations $ $0.1 
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows $ $ 
      

 
 Nine months ended
September 30,
 
In billions of dollars 2009 2008 

Proceeds from new securitizations

 $ $0.1 

Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

 $ $ 
      

Municipal Investments

        Municipal investment transactions represent partnerships that finance the construction and rehabilitation of low-income affordable rental housing. The Company generally invests in these partnerships as a limited partner and earns a return primarily through the receipt of tax credits earned from the affordable housing investments made by the partnership.

Client Intermediation

        Client intermediation transactions represent a range of transactions designed to provide investors with specified returns based on the returns of an underlying security, referenced asset or index. These transactions include credit-linked notes and equity-linked notes. In these transactions, the SPE typically obtains exposure to the underlying security, referenced asset or index through a derivative instrument, such as a total-return swap or a credit-default swap. In turn the SPE issues notes to investors that pay a return based on the specified underlying security, referenced asset or index. The SPE invests the proceeds in a financial asset or a guaranteed insurance contract (GIC) that serves as collateral for the


Table of Contents

derivative contract over the term of the transaction. The Company's involvement in these transactions includes being the counterparty to the SPE's derivative instruments and investing in a portion of the notes issued by the SPE. In certain


Table of Contents

transactions, the investor's maximum risk of loss is limited and the Company absorbs risk of loss above a specified level.

        The Company's maximum risk of loss in these transactions is defined as the amount invested in notes issued by the SPE and the notional amount of any risk of loss absorbed by the Company through a separate instrument issued by the SPE. The derivative instrument held by the Company may generate a receivable from the SPE (for example, where the Company purchases credit protection from the SPE in connection with the SPE's issuance of a credit-linked note), which is collateralized by the assets owned by the SPE. These derivative instruments are not considered variable interests under FIN 46(R) (ASC 810-10-15) and any associated receivables are not included in the calculation of maximum exposure to the SPE.

Structured Investment Vehicles

        Structured Investment Vehicles (SIVs) are SPEs that issue junior notes and senior debt (medium-term notes and short-term commercial paper) to fund the purchase of high quality assets. The Company acts as manager for the SIVs.

        In order to complete the wind-down of the SIVs, the Company purchased the remaining assets of the SIVs in November 2008. The Company funded the purchase of the SIV assets by assuming the obligation to pay amounts due under the medium-term notes issued by the SIVs, as the medium-term notes mature.

Investment Funds

        The Company is the investment manager for certain investment funds that invest in various asset classes including private equity, hedge funds, real estate, fixed income and infrastructure. The Company earns a management fee, which is a percentage of capital under management, and may earn performance fees. In addition, for some of these funds the Company has an ownership interest in the investment funds.

        The Company has also established a number of investment funds as opportunities for qualified employees to invest in private equity investments. The Company acts as investment manager to these funds and may provide employees with financing on both a recourse and non-recourse basis for a portion of the employees' investment commitments.

Trust Preferred Securities

        The Company has raised financing through the issuance of trust preferred securities. In these transactions, the Company forms a statutory business trust and owns all of the voting equity shares of the trust. The trust issues preferred equity securities to third-party investors and invests the gross proceeds in junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures issued by the Company. These trusts have no assets, operations, revenues or cash flows other than those related to the issuance, administration and repayment of the preferred equity securities held by third-party investors. These trusts' obligations are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Company.

        Because the sole asset of the trust is a receivable from the Company and the proceeds to the Company from the receivable exceed the Company's investment in the VIE's equity shares, the Company is not permitted to consolidate the trusts, under FIN 46(R) (ASC 810-10-15), even though the Company owns all of the voting equity shares of the trust, has fully guaranteed the trusts' obligations, and has the right to redeem the preferred securities in certain circumstances. The Company recognizes the subordinated debentures on its balance sheet as long-term liabilities.


Table of Contents


16.    DERIVATIVES ACTIVITIES

        In the ordinary course of business, Citigroup enters into various types of derivative transactions. These derivative transactions include:

    Futures and forward contracts which are commitments to buy or sell at a future date a financial instrument, commodity or currency at a contracted price and may be settled in cash or through delivery.

    Swap contracts which are commitments to settle in cash at a future date or dates that may range from a few days to a number of years, based on differentials between specified financial indices, as applied to a notional principal amount.

    Option contracts which give the purchaser, for a fee, the right, but not the obligation, to buy or sell within a limited time a financial instrument, commodity or currency at a contracted price that may also be settled in cash, based on differentials between specified indices or prices.

Citigroup enters into these derivative contracts relating to interest rate, foreign currency, commodity, and other market/credit risks for the following reasons:

    Trading Purposes—Customer NeedsNeeds—Citigroup offers its customers derivatives in connection with their risk-management actions to transfer, modify or reduce their interest rate, foreign exchange and other market/ credit risks or for their own trading purposes. As part of this process, Citigroup considers the customers' suitability for the risk involved, and the business purpose for the transaction. Citigroup also manages its derivative-risk positions through offsetting trade activities, controls focused on price verification, and daily reporting of positions to senior managers.

    Trading Purposes—Own AccountAccount—Citigroup trades derivatives for its own account, and as an active market maker. Trading limits and price verification controls are key aspects of this activity.

    HedgingHedging—Citigroup uses derivatives in connection with its risk-management activities to hedge certain risks or reposition the risk profile of the Company. For example, Citigroup may issue fixed-rate long-term debt and then enter into a receive-fixed, pay-variable-rate interest rate swap with the same tenor and notional amount to convert the interest payments to a net variable-rate basis. This strategy is the most common form of an interest rate hedge, as it minimizes interest cost in certain yield curve environments. Derivatives are also used to manage risks inherent in specific groups of on-balance sheet assets and liabilities, including investments, corporate and consumer loans, deposit liabilities, as well as other interest-sensitive assets and liabilities. In addition, foreign- exchange contracts are used to hedge non-U.S. dollar denominated debt, foreign-currency-denominated available-for-sale securities, net capital exposures and foreign-exchange transactions.

        Derivatives may expose Citigroup to market, credit or liquidity risks in excess of the amounts recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Market risk on a derivative product is the exposure created by potential fluctuations in interest rates, foreign-exchange rates and other factors and is a function of the type of product, the volume of transactions, the tenor and terms of the agreement, and the underlying volatility. Credit risk is the exposure to loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the transaction where the value of any collateral held is not adequate to cover such losses. The recognition in earnings of unrealized gains on these transactions is subject to management's assessment as to collectibility.collectability. Liquidity risk is the potential exposure that arises when the size of the derivative position may not be able to be rapidly adjusted in periods of high volatility and financial stress at a reasonable cost.

        Information pertaining to the volume of derivative activity is provided in the tables below. The notional amounts of Citigroup's derivative instruments for both long and short derivative positions, representing the volume of Citigroup's derivative instrumentsactivity, as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 are presented in the table below:


Table of Contents

Notionals

 
 Hedging
Instruments
under
SFAS 133
(ASC 815)(1)
 Other Derivative Instruments 
In millions of dollars at June 30, 2009  
 Trading
Derivatives
 Management
Hedges(2)
 
Interest rate contracts          
 Swaps $109,852 $15,297,418 $203,874 
 Futures and forwards    3,724,252  101,832 
 Written options    3,063,580  18,850 
 Purchased options    3,227,193  50,726 
        
Total interest rate contract notionals $109,852 $25,312,443 $375,282 
        
Foreign exchange contracts          
 Swaps $32,546 $914,889 $23,096 
 Futures and forwards  36,651  2,030,750  7,434 
 Written options  1,624  435,498  4,849 
 Purchased options  2,474  451,971   
        
Total foreign exchange contract notionals $73,295 $3,833,108 $35,379 
        
Equity contracts          
 Swaps $ $90,794 $ 
 Futures and forwards    13,557   
 Written options    463,668   
 Purchased options    442,601   
        
Total equity contract notionals $ $1,010,620 $ 
        
Commodity and other contracts          
 Swaps $ $27,451 $ 
 Futures and forwards    84,905   
 Written options    30,663   
 Purchased options    30,254   
        
Total commodity and other contract notionals $ $173,273 $ 
        
Credit derivatives(3)          
 Citigroup as the Guarantor $ $1,365,688 $ 
 Citigroup as the Beneficiary  6,668  1,473,598   
        
Total credit derivatives $6,668 $2,839,286 $ 
        
Total derivative notionals $189,815 $33,168,730 $410,661 
        

 
 Hedging
Instruments
under
ASC 815 (SFAS 133)(1)
 Other Derivative Instruments 
In millions of dollars at September 30, 2009  
 Trading
Derivatives
 Management
Hedges(2)
 

Interest rate contracts

          
 

Swaps

 $130,241 $14,903,492 $194,225 
 

Futures and forwards

    3,876,745  84,999 
 

Written options

    3,214,707  9,493 
 

Purchased options

    3,468,676  43,537 
        

Total interest rate contract notionals

 $130,241 $25,463,620 $332,254 
        

Foreign exchange contracts

          
 

Swaps

 $61,527 $867,475 $101,151 
 

Futures and forwards

  18,190  2,025,595  10,672 
 

Written options

  316  392,903  15,150 
 

Purchased options

  501  415,386  2,603 
        

Total foreign exchange contract notionals

 $80,534 $3,701,359 $129,576 
        

Equity contracts

          
 

Swaps

 $ $81,620 $ 
 

Futures and forwards

    14,567   
 

Written options

    528,027   
 

Purchased options

    505,812   
        

Total equity contract notionals

 $ $1,130,026 $ 
        

Commodity and other contracts

          
 

Swaps

 $ $29,746 $ 
 

Futures and forwards

    101,574   
 

Written options

    39,066   
 

Purchased options

    40,662   
        

Total commodity and other contract notionals

 $ $211,048 $ 
        

Credit derivatives(3)

          
 

Citigroup as the Guarantor

 $ $1,315,106 $ 
 

Citigroup as the Beneficiary

  6,773  1,442,602   
        

Total credit derivatives

 $6,773 $2,757,708 $ 
        

Total derivative notionals

 $217,548 $33,263,761 $461,830 
        

(1)
Derivatives in hedge accounting relationships accounted for under SFAS 133 (ASC 815) are recorded in either Other assets/liabilities or Trading account assets/liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

(2)
Management hedges represent derivative instruments used in certain economic hedging relationships that are identified for management purposes, but for which SFAS 133 (ASC 815) hedge accounting is not applied. These derivatives are recorded in Other assets/liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

(3)
Credit derivatives are arrangements designed to allow one party (the "beneficiary") to transfer the credit risk of a "reference asset" to another party (the "guarantor"). These arrangements allow a guarantor to assume the credit risk associated with the reference asset without directly purchasing it. The Company has entered into credit derivatives positions for purposes such as risk management, yield enhancement, reduction of credit concentrations and diversification of overall risk.

Table of Contents

Mark-to-Market (MTM) Receivables/Payables

 
 Derivatives classified in Trading
account assets / liabilities(1)
 Derivatives classified in Other
assets / liabilities
 
In millions of dollars at June 30, 2009 Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities 
Derivative instruments designated as SFAS 133 (ASC 815) hedges             
 Interest rate contracts $584 $1,705 $4,096 $1,207 
 Foreign exchange contracts  856  598  2,548  3,327 
 Credit derivatives      370   
          
Total derivative instruments designated as SFAS 133 (ASC 815) hedges $1,440 $2,303 $7,014 $4,534 
          
Other derivative instruments             
 Interest rate contracts $486,039 $464,981 $3,751 $5,812 
 Foreign exchange contracts  86,957  91,643  850  679 
 Equity contracts  24,444  45,070     
 Commodity and other contracts  21,331  20,447     
 Credit derivatives  150,658  133,344     
          
Total other derivative instruments $769,429 $755,485 $4,601 $6,491 
          
Total derivatives $770,869 $757,788 $11,615 $11,025 
Cash collateral paid/received  55,356  51,227  707  2,943 
 Less: Netting agreements and market value adjustments  (753,067) (745,467) (3,650) (3,650)
          
Net receivables/ payables $73,158 $63,548 $8,672 $10,318 
          

 
 Derivatives classified in Trading
account assets / liabilities(1)
 Derivatives classified in
Other
assets / liabilities
 
In millions of dollars at September 30, 2009 Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities 

Derivative instruments designated as hedges

             
 

Interest rate contracts

 $2,860 $4,380 $5,551 $1,156 
 

Foreign exchange contracts

  134  1,246  3,942  2,826 
 

Credit derivatives

        110 
          

Total derivative instruments designated as hedges

 $2,994 $5,626 $9,493 $4,092 
          

Other derivative instruments

             
 

Interest rate contracts

 $523,370 $505,442 $3,062 $4,727 
 

Foreign exchange contracts

  88,944  89,225  1,233  1,240 
 

Equity contracts

  23,706  47,070     
 

Commodity and other contracts

  16,692  16,275     
 

Credit derivatives(2)

  112,227  100,575     
          

Total other derivative instruments

 $764,939 $758,587 $4,295 $5,967 
          

Total derivatives

 $767,933 $764,213 $13,788 $10,059 

Cash collateral paid/received

  54,169  43,471  510  5,720 
 

Less: Netting agreements and market value adjustments

  (753,432) (745,132) (4,713) (4,713)
          

Net receivables/ payables

 $68,670 $62,552 $9,585 $11,066 
          

(1)
The trading derivatives fair values are presented in Note 9—Trading Assets and Liabilities.

(2)
The credit derivatives trading assets are comprised of $88,903 million related to protection purchased and $23,324 million related protection sold at September 30, 2009. The credit derivatives trading liabilities are comprised of $76,581 million related to protection sold and $23,994 related to protection purchased at September 30, 2009.

        All derivatives are reported on the balance sheet at fair value. In addition, where applicable, all such contracts covered by master netting agreements are reported net. Gross positive fair values are netted with gross negative fair values by counterparty pursuant to a valid master netting agreement. In addition, payables and receivables in respect of cash collateral received from or paid to a given counterparty are included in this netting. However, non-cash collateral is not included.

        As of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 the amount of payables in respect of cash collateral received that was netted with unrealized gains from derivatives was $40$36 billion, while the amount of receivables in respect of cash collateral paid that was netted with unrealized losses from derivatives was $50$46 billion.

        The amounts recognized in principal transactions in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the quarterthree and nine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 related to derivatives not designated in a qualifying SFAS 133 (ASC 815) hedging relationship are shown in the table below:below. Citigroup has elected to present this disclosure by business classification, showing derivative gains and losses related to its trading activities together with gains and losses related to non-derivative instruments within the same trading portfolios, as this better represents the way that these portfolios are risk managed.

 
 Non-designated derivatives(1)—gains (losses)
Three months ended June 30, 2009
 Non-designated derivatives(1)—gains (losses)
Six months ended June 30, 2009
 
In millions of dollars Principal
transactions
 Other
revenues
 Principal
transactions
 Other
revenues
 
 Interest rate contracts $(237)$192 $(2,583)$420 
 Foreign exchange contracts  1,797  (3,362) 2,047  (2,366)
 Equity contracts  674    589   
 Commodity and other contracts  (103)   234   
 Credit derivatives  (98)   240   
          
Total gain (loss) on non-designated derivatives(1) $2,033 $(3,170)$527 $(1,946)
          

In millions of dollars Gains (losses)
Three months ended September 30, 2009
 Gains (losses)
Nine months ended September 30, 2009
 
 

Fixed Income

 $428 $5,359 
 

Foreign exchange

  445  2,157 
 

Equity

  (353) 550 
 

Commodity and other products

  162  990 
 

Credit products

  846  (3,500)
      

Total(1)

 $1,528 $5,556 
      

(1)
Balance excludes gains (losses) on derivatives designated within qualifying FAS 133 hedging relationships.

Table of Contents

        The amounts recognized in other revenue in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 related to derivatives not designated in a qualifying hedging relationship, and not recorded within Trading account assets or liabilities are shown below.

In millions of dollars Gains (losses)
Three months ended September 30, 2009
 Gains (losses)
Nine months ended September 30, 2009
 
 

Interest rate contracts

 $(384)$36 
 

Foreign exchange contracts

  (2,130) (4,496)
 

Equity contracts

     
 

Commodity and other contracts

     
 

Credit derivatives

     
      

Total(1)

 $(2,514)$(4,460)
      

(1)
Non-designated derivatives are derivative instruments not designated in qualifying SFAS 133 (ASC 815) hedging relationships.

Accounting for Derivative Hedging

        Citigroup accounts for its hedging activities in accordance with SFAS 133 (ASC 815)ASC 815 (SFAS 133). As a general rule, SFAS 133 (ASC 815) hedge accounting is permitted for those situations where the Company is exposed to a particular risk, such as interest-rate or foreign-exchange risk, that causes changes in the fair value of an asset or liability, or variability in the expected future cash flows of an existing asset, liability or a forecasted transaction that may affect earnings.

        Derivative contracts hedging the risks associated with the changes in fair value are referred to as fair value hedges, while contracts hedging the risks affecting the expected future cash flows are called cash flow hedges. Hedges that utilize derivatives or debt instruments to manage the foreign exchange risk associated with equity investments in non-U.S. dollar functional currency foreign subsidiaries (net investment in a foreign operation) are called net investment hedges.

        If certain hedging criteria specified in SFAS 133 (ASC 815)ASC 815 (SFAS 133) are met, including testing for hedge effectiveness, special hedge accounting may be applied. The hedge effectiveness assessment methodologies for similar hedges are performed in a similar manner and are used consistently throughout the hedging relationships. For fair value hedges, the changes in value of the hedging derivative, as well as the changes in


Table of Contents

value of the related hedged item due to the risk being hedged, are reflected in current earnings. For cash flow hedges and net investment hedges, the changes in value of the hedging derivative are reflected in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in Citigroup's stockholders' equity, to the extent the hedge is effective. Hedge ineffectiveness, in either case, is reflected in current earnings.

        For asset/liability management hedging, the fixed-rate long-term debt may be recorded at amortized cost under current U.S. GAAP. However, by electing to use SFAS 133 (ASC 815) hedge accounting, the carrying value of the debt is adjusted for changes in the benchmark interest rate, with any such changes in value recorded in current earnings. The related interest-rate swap is also recorded on the balance sheet at fair value, with any changes in fair value reflected in earnings. Thus, any ineffectiveness resulting from the hedging relationship is recorded in current earnings. Alternatively, an economic hedge, which does not meet the SFAS 133 (ASC 815) hedging criteria, would involve only recording the derivative at fair value on the balance sheet, with its associated changes in fair value recorded in earnings. The debt would continue to be carried at amortized cost and, therefore, current earnings would be impacted only by the interest rate shifts and other factors that cause the change in the swap's value and the underlying yield of the debt. This type of hedge is undertaken when SFAS 133 (ASC 815) hedge requirements cannot be achieved or management decides not to apply SFAS 133 (ASC 815) hedge accounting. Another alternative for the Company would be to elect to carry the debt at fair value under SFAS 159 (ASC 825-10).value. Once the irrevocable election is made upon issuance of the debt, the full change in fair value of the debt would be reported in earnings. The related interest rate swap, with changes in fair value also reflected in earnings, provides a natural offset to the debt's fair value change. To the extent the two offsets would not be exactly equal, the difference would be reflected in current earnings. This type of economic hedge is undertaken when the Company prefers to follow this simpler method that achieves generally similar financial statement results to an SFAS 133 (ASC 815)a fair-value hedge.

        Key aspects of achieving SFAS 133 (ASC 815) hedge accounting are documentation of hedging strategy and hedge effectiveness at the hedge inception and substantiating hedge effectiveness on an ongoing basis. A derivative must be highly effective in accomplishing the hedge objective of offsetting either changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item for the risk being hedged. Any ineffectiveness in the hedge relationship is recognized in current earnings. The assessment of effectiveness excludes changes in the value of the hedged item that are unrelated to the risks being hedged. Similarly, the assessment of effectiveness may exclude changes in the fair value of a derivative related to time value that, if excluded, are recognized in current earnings.


Table of Contents

Fair value hedges

Hedging of benchmark interest rate risk

        Citigroup hedges exposure to changes in the fair value of outstanding fixed-rate issued debt and borrowings. The fixed cash flows from those financing transactions are converted to benchmark variable-rate cash flows by entering into receive fixed, pay-variable interest rate swaps. These fair-value hedge relationships use dollar-offset ratio analysis to determine whether the hedging relationships are highly effective at inception and on an ongoing basis.

        Citigroup also hedges exposure to changes in the fair value of fixed-rate assets, including available-for-sale debt securities and loans. The hedging instruments used are receive-variable, pay-fixed interest rate swaps. Most of these fair-value hedging relationships use dollar-offset ratio analysis to determine whether the hedging relationships are highly effective at inception and on an ongoing basis, while certain others use regression analysis.

Hedging of foreign exchange risk

        Citigroup hedges the change in fair value attributable to foreign-exchange rate movements in available-for-sale securities that are denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the entity holding the securities, which may be within or outside the U.S. The hedging instrument employed is a forward foreign-exchange contract. In this type of hedge, the change in fair value of the hedged available-for-sale security attributable to the portion of foreign exchange risk hedged is reported in earnings and not Accumulated other comprehensive income—a process that serves to offset substantially the change in fair value of the forward contract that is also reflected in earnings. Citigroup considers the premium associated with forward contracts (differential between spot and contractual forward rates) as the cost of hedging; this is excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness and reflected directly in earnings. Dollar-offset method is used to assess hedge effectiveness. Since that assessment is based on changes in fair value attributable to changes in spot rates on both the available-for-sale securities and the forward contracts for the portion of the relationship hedged, the amount of hedge ineffectiveness is not significant.


Table of Contents

        The following table summarizes certain information related to the Company's fair value hedges for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009:

 
 Three months ended June 30, 2009 Six months ended June 30, 2009 
In millions of dollars Principal
Transactions
 Other
Revenue
 Principal
Transactions
 Other
Revenue
 
Gain (loss) on fair value designated and qualifying hedges             
 Interest rate contracts $509 $(3,687)$965 $(5,886)
 Foreign exchange contracts  1,186  467  1,303  322 
          
Total gain (loss) on fair value designated and qualifying hedges $1,695 $(3,220)$2,268 $(5,564)
          
Gain (loss) on the hedged item in designated and qualifying fair value hedges             
 Interest rate hedges $(593)$3,546 $(1,042)$5,990 
 Foreign exchange hedges  (1,306) (571) (1,151) (283)
          
Total gain (loss) on the hedged item in designated and qualifying fair value hedge $(1,899)$2,975 $(2,193)$5,707 
          
Hedge ineffectiveness recognized in earnings on designated and qualifying fair value hedges             
 Interest rate hedges $50 $(170)$131 $85 
 Foreign exchange hedges  (3) (105) 8  32 
          
Total hedge ineffectiveness recognized in earnings on designated and qualifying fair value hedges $47 $(275)$139 $117 
          
Net gain (loss) excluded from assessment of the effectiveness of fair value hedges             
 Interest rate contracts $(134)$29 $(208)$19 
 Foreign exchange contracts  (117) 1  144  7 
          
Total net gain / (loss) excluded from assessment of the effectiveness of fair value hedges $(251)$30 $(64)$26 
          

 
 Three months ended
September 30, 2009
 Nine months ended
September 30, 2009
 
In millions of dollars Principal
Transactions
 Other
Revenue
 Principal
Transactions
 Other
Revenue
 

Gain (loss) on designated and qualifying fair value hedges

             
 

Interest rate contracts

 $(238)$1,511 $727 $(4,375)
 

Foreign exchange contracts

  (640) 323  663  645 
          

Total gain (loss) on fair value designated and qualifying hedges

 $(878)$1,834 $1,390 $(3,730)
          

Gain (loss) on the hedged item in designated and qualifying fair value hedges

             
 

Interest rate hedges

 $293 $(1,516)$(749)$4,474 
 

Foreign exchange hedges

  717  (293) (434) (576)
          

Total gain (loss) on the hedged item in designated and qualifying fair value hedge

 $1,010 $(1,809)$(1,183)$3,898 
          

Hedge ineffectiveness recognized in earnings on designated and qualifying fair value hedges

             
 

Interest rate hedges

 $182 $(106)$313 $(21)
 

Foreign exchange hedges

  14  60  22  92 
          

Total hedge ineffectiveness recognized in earnings on designated and qualifying fair value hedges

 $196 $(46)$335 $71 
          

Net gain (loss) excluded from assessment of the effectiveness of fair value hedges

             
 

Interest rate contracts

 $(127)$101 $(335)$120 
 

Foreign exchange contracts

  63  (30) 207  (23)
          

Total net gain (loss) excluded from assessment of the effectiveness of fair value hedges

 $(64)$71 $(128)$97 
          

Table of Contents

Cash flow hedges

Hedging of benchmark interest rate risk

        Citigroup hedges variable cash flows resulting from floating-rate liabilities and roll over (re-issuance) of short-term liabilities. Variable cash flows from those liabilities are converted to fixed-rate cash flows by entering into receive-variable, pay-fixed interest-rate swaps and receive-variable, pay-fixed forward-starting interest-rate swaps. For some hedges, the hedge ineffectiveness is eliminated by matching all terms of the hedged item and the hedging derivative at inception and on an ongoing basis. Citigroup does not exclude any terms from consideration when applying the matched terms method. To the extent all terms are not perfectly matched, these cash-flow hedging relationships use either regression analysis or dollar-offset ratio analysis to assess whether the hedging relationships are highly effective at inception and on an ongoing basis. Since efforts are made to match the terms of the derivatives to those of the hedged forecasted cash flows as closely as possible, the amount of hedge ineffectiveness is not significant even when the terms do not match perfectly.

Hedging of foreign exchange risk

        Citigroup locks in the functional currency equivalent of cash flows of various balance sheet liability exposures, including short-term borrowings and long-term debt (and the forecasted issuances or rollover of such items) that are denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of the issuing entity. Depending on the risk-management objectives, these types of hedges are designated as either cash-flow hedges of only foreign exchange risk or cash-flow hedges of both foreign-exchange and interest rate risk, and the hedging instruments used are foreign-exchange forward contracts, cross-currency swaps and foreign-currency options. For some hedges, Citigroup matches all terms of the hedged item and the hedging derivative at inception and on an ongoing basis to eliminate hedge ineffectiveness. Citigroup does not exclude any terms from consideration when applying the matched terms method. To the extent all terms are not perfectly matched, any ineffectiveness is measured using the "hypothetical derivative method" from FASB Derivative Implementation Group Issue G7(ASC 815-30-35-12 through 35-32). Efforts are made to match up the terms of the hypothetical and actual derivatives used as closely as possible. As a result, the amount of hedge ineffectiveness is not significant even when the terms do not match perfectly.

Hedging total return

        Citigroup generally manages the risk associated with highly leveraged financing it has entered into by seeking to sell a majority of its exposures to the market prior to or shortly after funding. The portion of the highly leveraged financing that is retained by Citigroup is hedged with a total return swap.

        The hedge ineffectiveness on the cash flow hedges recognized in earnings totals $5$3 million for the three months


Table of Contents

ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and $9$12 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009.

        The pretax change in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) from cash flow hedges for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 is presented below:

In millions of dollars Three months
ended
June 30, 2009
 Six months
ended
June 30, 2009
 

Effective portion of cash flow hedges included in AOCI

       
 

Interest rate contracts

 $402 $570 
 

Foreign exchange contracts

  233  633 
 

Credit derivatives

  (1,135) 358 
      

Total Effective portion of cash flow hedges included in AOCI

 $(500)$1,561 
      

Effective portion of cash flow hedges reclassified from AOCI to Earnings

       
 

Interest rate contracts(1)

 $(445)$(857)
 

Foreign exchange contracts(2)

  (65) 21 
 

Credit derivatives

     
      

Total effective portion of cash flow hedges reclassified from AOCI to Earnings

 $(510)$(836)
      

In millions of dollars Three months
ended
September 30, 2009
 Nine months
ended
September 30, 2009
 

Effective portion of cash flow hedges included in AOCI

       
 

Interest rate contracts

 $(291)$279 
 

Foreign exchange contracts

  (312) 321 
 

Credit derivatives

  (404) (46)
      

Total effective portion of cash flow hedges included in AOCI

 $(1,007)$554 
      

Effective portion of cash flow hedges reclassified from AOCI to Earnings

       
 

Interest rate contracts(1)

 $(431)$(1,288)
 

Foreign exchange contracts(2)

  (149) (128)
 

Credit derivatives

     
      

Total effective portion of cash flow hedges reclassified from AOCI to Earnings

 $(580)$(1,416)
      

(1)
The amount reclassified from AOCI, related to interest rate cash flow hedges, to Other revenue and Principal transactions is ($395)404) million and ($50)27) million, respectively for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009, and ($762)1,166) million and ($95)122) million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009, respectively.

(2)
The amount reclassified from AOCI, related to foreign exchange cash flow hedges, to Other Revenue and Principal transactions is $(63)$(146) million and ($2)3) million, respectively, for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009, and $25$(121) million and ($4)7) million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009, respectively.

        For cash flow hedges, any changes in the fair value of the end-user derivative remaining inAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on the Consolidated Balance Sheet will be included in earnings of future periods to offset the variability of the hedged cash flows when such cash flows affect earnings. The net loss associated with cash flow hedges expected to be reclassified fromAccumulated other comprehensive income within 12 months of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 is approximately $2$2.1 billion.

        The impact of cash flow hedges on AOCI is also included within Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Changes in Accumulated Comprehensive Income (Loss).

Net investment hedges

        Consistent with SFAS No. 52,Foreign Currency TranslationASC 815-20-25-58 (SFAS 52/ASC 830-20-35-5), SFAS 133 (ASC 815-20-25-58)133) allows hedging of the foreign-currency risk of a net investment in a foreign operation. Citigroup uses foreign-currency forwards, options and swaps and foreign-currency-denominated debt instruments to manage the foreign-exchange risk associated with Citigroup's equity investments in several non-U.S. dollar functional currency foreign subsidiaries. In accordance with SFAS 52(ASC 830-30-50-1), Citigroup records the change in the carrying amount of these investments in theCumulative translation adjustment account withinAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Simultaneously, the effective portion of the hedge of this exposure is also recorded in theCumulative translation


Table of Contents

adjustment account and the ineffective portion, if any, is immediately recorded in earnings.

        For derivatives used in net investment hedges, Citigroup follows the forward-rate method from FASB Derivative Implementation Group Issue H8 (ASC 815-35-35-16 through 35-26), "Foreign Currency Hedges: Measuring the Amount of Ineffectiveness in a Net Investment Hedge."method. According to that method, all changes in fair value, including changes related to the forward-rate component of the foreign-currency forward contracts and the time-value of foreign-currency options, are recorded in the Cumulative translation adjustment account. For foreign-currency denominated debt instruments that are designated as hedges of net investments, the translation gain or loss that is recorded in the cumulative translation adjustment account is based on the spot exchange rate between the functional currency of the respective subsidiary and the U.S. dollar, which is the functional currency of Citigroup. To the extent the notional amount of the hedging instrument exactly matches the hedged net investment and the underlying exchange rate of the derivative hedging instrument relates to the exchange rate between the functional currency of the net investment and Citigroup's functional currency (or, in the case of a non-derivative debt instrument, such instrument is denominated in the functional currency of the net investment), no ineffectiveness is recorded in earnings.

        The following table summarizes certain information related to the Company's net investment hedges for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009:

Net Investments Hedges(1)
In millions of dollars
 Three months
ended
June 30, 2009
 Six months
ended
June 30, 2009
 

Pretax gain (loss) included in FX translation adjustment with AOCI

 $(3,451)$(2,912)

Gain (loss) on hedge ineffectiveness on net investment hedges included in Other revenue

 $(5)$4 
      

Net Investments Hedges(1)
In millions of dollars
 Three months
ended
September 30, 2009
 Nine months
ended
September 30, 2009
 

Pretax gain (loss) included in FX translation adjustment with AOCI

 $(1,232)$(4,144)

Gain (loss) on hedge ineffectiveness on net investment hedges included in Other revenue

 $ $4 
      

(1)
No amount, related to the effective portion of net investment hedges, was reclassed from AOCI to earnings for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009. Additionally, no amount was excluded from the assessment of the effectiveness of the net investment hedges during the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009.

Credit Derivatives

        A credit derivative is a bilateral contract between a buyer and a seller under which the seller agrees to provide protection to the buyer against the credit risk of a particular entity ("reference entity" or "reference credit"). Credit derivatives generally require that the seller of credit protection make payments to the buyer upon the occurrence of predefined credit events (commonly referred to as "settlement triggers"). These settlement triggers are defined by the form of the derivative and the reference credit and are generally limited to the market standard of failure to pay on indebtedness and bankruptcy of the reference credit and, in a more limited range of transactions, debt restructuring. Credit derivative transactions referring to emerging market reference credits will also typically include additional settlement triggers to cover the acceleration of indebtedness and the risk of repudiation or a payment moratorium. In certain transactions,


Table of Contents

protection may be provided on a portfolio of referenced credits or asset-backed securities. The seller of such protection may not be required to make payment until a specified amount of losses has occurred with respect to the portfolio and/or may only be required to pay for losses up to a specified amount.

        The Company makes markets in and trades a range of credit derivatives, both on behalf of clients as well as for its own account. Through these contracts, the Company either purchases or writes protection on either a single name or a portfolio of reference credits. The Company uses credit derivatives to help mitigate credit risk in its corporate loan portfolio and other cash positions, to take proprietary trading positions, and to facilitate client transactions.

        The range of credit derivatives sold includes credit default swaps, total return swaps and credit options.

        A credit default swap is a contract in which, for a fee, a protection seller (guarantor) agrees to reimburse a protection buyer (beneficiary) for any losses that occur due to a credit event on a reference entity. If there is no credit default event or settlement trigger, as defined by the specific derivative contract, then the guarantor makes no payments to the beneficiary and receives only the contractually specified fee. However, if a credit event occurs as defined in the specific derivative contract sold, the guarantor will be required to make a payment to the beneficiary.

        A total return swap transfers the total economic performance of a reference asset, which includes all associated cash flows, as well as capital appreciation or depreciation. The protection buyer (beneficiary) receives a floating rate of interest and any depreciation on the reference asset from the protection seller (guarantor) and, in return, the protection seller receives the cash flows associated with the reference asset plus any appreciation. Thus, according to the total return swap agreement, the beneficiary will be obligated to make a payment any time the floating interest rate payment and any depreciation of the reference asset exceed the cash flows associated with the underlying asset. A total return swap may terminate upon a default of the reference asset subject to the provisions of the related total return swap agreement between the protection seller (guarantor) and the protection buyer (beneficiary).

        A credit option is a credit derivative that allows investors to trade or hedge changes in the credit quality of the reference asset. For example, in a credit spread option, the option writer (guarantor) assumes the obligation to purchase or sell the reference asset at a specified "strike" spread level. The option purchaser (beneficiary) buys the right to sell the reference asset to, or purchase it from, the option writer at the strike spread level. The payments on credit spread options depend either on a particular credit spread or the price of the underlying credit-sensitive asset. The options usually terminate if the underlying assets default.

        A credit-linked note is a form of credit derivative structured as a debt security with an embedded credit default swap. The purchaser of the note writes credit protection to the issuer, and receives a return which will be negatively affected by credit events on the underlying reference credit. If the reference entity defaults, the purchaser of the credit-linked note may assume the long position in the debt security and any future cash flows from it, but will lose the amount paid to the issuer of the credit-linked note. Thus the maximum amount of the exposure is the carrying amount of the credit-linked note. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31,


Table of Contents

2008, the amount of credit-linked notes held by the Company in trading inventory was immaterial.

        The following tables summarize the key characteristics of the Company's credit derivative portfolio as protection seller (guarantor) as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:

In millions of dollars as of
June 30, 2009
 Maximum potential
amount of
future payments
 Fair
value
payable
 

By industry/counterparty

       

Bank

 $899,598 $71,253 

Broker-dealer

  322,349  30,798 

Monoline

  123  89 

Non-financial

  4,805  231 

Insurance and other financial institutions

  138,813  14,756 
      

Total by industry/counterparty

 $1,365,688 $117,127 
      

By instrument:

       

Credit default swaps and options

 $1,363,738 $116,600 

Total return swaps and other

  1,950  527 
      

Total by instrument

 $1,365,688 $117,127 
      

By rating:

       

Investment grade

 $813,892  49,503 

Non-investment grade

  342,888  46,242 

Not rated

  208,908  21,382 
      

Total by rating

 $1,365,688 $117,127 
      


In millions of dollars as of
December 31, 2008
 Maximum potential
amount of
future payments
 Fair
value
payable
 

By industry/counterparty

       

Bank

 $943,949 $118,428 

Broker-dealer

  365,664  55,458 

Monoline

  139  91 

Non-financial

  7,540  2,556 

Insurance and other financial institutions

  125,988  21,700 
      

Total by industry/counterparty

 $1,443,280 $198,233 
      

By instrument:

       

Credit default swaps and options

 $1,441,375 $197,981 

Total return swaps and other

  1,905  252 
      

Total by instrument

 $1,443,280 $198,233 
      

By rating:

       

Investment grade

 $851,426 $83,672 

Non-investment grade

  410,483  87,508 

Not rated

  181,371  27,053 
      

Total by rating

 $1,443,280 $198,233 
      
In millions of dollars as of
September 30, 2009
 Maximum potential
amount of
future payments
 Fair value
payable(1)
 

By industry/counterparty

       

Bank

 $860,437 $46,071 

Broker-dealer

  301,216  17,661 

Monoline

     

Non-financial

  2,127  96 

Insurance and other financial institutions

  151,326  12,753 
      

Total by industry/counterparty

 $1,315,106 $76,581 
      

By instrument:

       

Credit default swaps and options

 $1,314,282 $76,383 

Total return swaps

  824  198 
      

Total by instrument

 $1,315,106 $76,581 
      

By rating:

       

Investment grade

 $759,845  23,362 

Non-investment grade

  422,865  33,231 

Not rated

  132,396  19,988 
      

Total by rating

 $1,315,106 $76,581 
      

(1)
In addition, fair value amounts receivable under credit derivatives sold were $23,324 million.

In millions of dollars as of
December 31, 2008
 Maximum potential
amount of
future payments
 Fair
value
payable(1)
 

By industry/counterparty

       

Bank

 $943,949 $118,428 

Broker-dealer

  365,664  55,458 

Monoline

  139  91 

Non-financial

  7,540  2,556 

Insurance and other financial institutions

  125,988  21,700 
      

Total by industry/counterparty

 $1,443,280 $198,233 
      

By instrument:

       

Credit default swaps and options

 $1,441,375 $197,981 

Total return swaps

  1,905  252 
      

Total by instrument

 $1,443,280 $198,233 
      

By rating:

       

Investment grade

 $851,426 $83,672 

Non-investment grade

  410,483  87,508 

Not rated

  181,371  27,053 
      

Total by rating

 $1,443,280 $198,233 
      

(1)
In addition, fair value amounts receivable under credit derivatives sold were $5,890 million.

        Citigroup evaluates the payment/performance risk of the credit derivatives to which it stands as guarantor based on the credit rating which has been assigned to the underlying referenced credit. Where external ratings by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations (such as Moody's and S&P), are used, investment grade ratings are considered to be Baa/BBB or above, while anything below is considered non-investment grade. The Citigroup internal ratings are in line with the related external credit rating system. On certain underlying referenced credit, mainly related to over-the-counter credit derivatives, ratings are not available, and these are included in the not-rated category. Credit derivatives written on an underlying non-investment grade referenced credit represent greater payment risk to the Company. The non-investment grade category in the table above primarily


Table of Contents

includes credit derivatives where the underlying referenced entity has been downgraded subsequent to the inception of the derivative.

        The maximum potential amount of future payments under credit derivative contracts presented in the table above is based on the notional value of the derivatives. The Company believes that the maximum potential amount of future payments for credit protection sold is not representative of the actual loss exposure based on historical experience. This amount has not been reduced by the Company's rights to the underlying assets and the related cash flows. In accordance with most credit derivative contracts, should a credit event (or settlement trigger) occur, the Company is usually liable for the difference between the protection sold and the recourse it holds in the value of the underlying assets. Thus, if the reference entity defaults, Citi will generally have a right to collect on the underlying reference credit and any related cash flows, while being liable for the full notional amount of credit protection sold to the buyer. Furthermore, this maximum potential amount of future payments for credit protection sold has not been reduced for any cash collateral paid to a given counterparty, as such payments would be calculated after netting all derivative exposures, including any credit derivatives with that counterparty in accordance with a related master netting agreement. Due to such netting processes, determining the amount of collateral that corresponds to credit derivative exposures only is not possible. The Company actively monitors open credit risk exposures, and manages this exposure by using a variety of strategies including purchased credit derivatives, cash collateral or direct holdings of the referenced assets. This risk mitigation activity is not captured in the table above.

Credit-Risk-Related Contingent Features in Derivatives

        Certain derivative instruments contain provisions that require the Company to either post additional collateral or immediately settle any outstanding liability balances upon the occurrence of a specified credit risk-related event. These events, which are defined by the existing derivative contracts, are primarily downgrades in the credit ratings of the Company and its affiliates. The fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that are in a liability position at JuneSeptember 30, 2009 is $20$21 billion. The Company has posted $14$13 billion as collateral for this exposure in the normal course of business as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009. Each downgrade would trigger additional collateral requirements for the Company and its affiliates. However, in the event that each legal entity was downgraded to below investment grade credit rating as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009, the Company would be required to post additional collateral of up to $3$5 billion.


Table of Contents


17.    FAIR-VALUE MEASUREMENT (SFAS 157/ASC 820-10)

        Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted SFAS 157(ASC 820-10)820-10 (SFAS 157). SFAS 157(ASC 820-10)820-10 (SFAS 157) defines fair value, establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure requirements about fair-value measurements. SFAS 157(ASC 820-10), amongAmong other things, the standard requires the Company to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. In addition, SFAS 157(ASC 820-10)it precludes the use of block discounts when measuring the fair value of instruments traded in an active market; such discounts were previously applied to large holdings of publicly traded equity securities. It also requires recognition of trade-date gains related to certain derivative transactions whose fair value has been determined using unobservable market inputs. This guidance supersedes the guidance in Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 02-3, "Issues Involved in Accounting for Derivative Contracts Held for Trading Purposes and Contracts Involved in Energy Trading and Risk Management Activities" (EITF Issue 02-3), which prohibited the recognition of trade-date gains for such derivative transactions when determining the fair value of instruments not traded in an active market.

        As a result of the adoption of SFAS 157(ASC 820-10),the standard, the Company made some amendments to the techniques used in measuring the fair value of derivative and other positions. These amendments change the way that the probability of default of a counterparty is factored into the valuation of derivative positions, include for the first time the impact of Citigroup's own credit risk on derivatives and other liabilities measured at fair value, and also eliminate the portfolio servicing adjustment that is no longer necessary under SFAS 157(ASC 820-10).necessary.

Fair-Value Hierarchy

        SFAS 157(ASC 820-10-35-37 to 35-55)820-10 (SFAS 157) also specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company's market assumptions. These two types of inputs have created the following fair-value hierarchy:

    Level 1—Quoted prices foridentical instruments in active markets.

    Level 2—Quoted prices forsimilar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets.

    Level 3—Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers areunobservable.

        This hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available. The Company considers relevant and observable market prices in its valuations where possible. The frequency of transactions, the size of the bid-ask spread and the amount of adjustment necessary when comparing similar transactions are all factors in determining the liquidity of markets and the relevance of observed prices in those markets.

Determination of Fair Value

        For assets and liabilities carried at fair value, the Company measures such value using the procedures set out below, irrespective of whether these assets and liabilities are carried at fair value as a result of an election under SFAS 159 (ASC 825-10-4 through 25-5), FASB Statement No. 155,Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments (SFAS 155/ASC 815-15-25-4 through 25-5), or FASB Statement No. 156,Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets (SFAS 156/ASC 860-50-35), or whether they were previously carried at fair value.

        When available, the Company generally uses quoted market prices to determine fair value and classifies such items in Level 1. In some cases where a market price is available, the Company will make use of acceptable practical expedients (such as matrix pricing) to calculate fair value, in which case the items are classified in Level 2.

        If quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based upon internally developed valuation techniques that use, where possible, current market-based or independently sourced market parameters, such as interest rates, currency rates, option volatilities, etc. Items valued using such internally generated valuation techniques are classified according to the lowest level input or value driver that is significant to the valuation. Thus, an item may be classified in Level 3 even though there may be some significant inputs that are readily observable.

        Where available, the Company may also make use of quoted prices for recent trading activity in positions with the same or similar characteristics to that being valued. The frequency and size of transactions and the amount of the bid-ask spread are among the factors considered in determining the liquidity of markets and the relevance of observed prices from those markets. If relevant and observable prices are available, those valuations would be classified as Level 2. If prices are not available, other valuation techniques would be used and the item would be classified as Level 3.

        Fair-value estimates from internal valuation techniques are verified, where possible, to prices obtained from independent vendors or brokers. Vendors and brokers' valuations may be based on a variety of inputs ranging from observed prices to proprietary valuation models.

        The following section describes the valuation methodologies used by the Company to measure various financial instruments at fair value, including an indication of the level in the fair-value hierarchy in which each instrument is generally classified. Where appropriate, the description includes details of the valuation models, the key inputs to those models as well as any significant assumptions.

Securities purchased under agreements to resell and securities sold under agreements to repurchase

        No quoted prices exist for such instruments and so fair value is determined using a discounted cash-flow technique. Cash flows are estimated based on the terms of the contract, taking into account any embedded derivative or other features. Expected cash flows are discounted using market rates appropriate to the maturity of the instrument as well as the nature and amount of collateral taken or received. Generally, such instruments are


Table of Contents

classified within Level 2 of the fair-value hierarchy as the inputs used in the fair valuation are readily observable.


Table of Contents

Trading Account Assets and Liabilities—Trading Securities and Trading Loans

        When available, the Company uses quoted market prices to determine the fair value of trading securities; such items are classified in Level 1 of the fair-value hierarchy. Examples include some government securities and exchange-traded equity securities.

        For bonds and secondary market loans traded over the counter, the Company generally determines fair value utilizing internal valuation techniques. Fair-value estimates from internal valuation techniques are verified, where possible, to prices obtained from independent vendors. Vendors compile prices from various sources and may apply matrix pricing for similar bonds or loans where no price is observable. If available, the Company may also use quoted prices for recent trading activity of assets with similar characteristics to the bond or loan being valued. Trading securities and loans priced using such methods are generally classified as Level 2. However, when less liquidity exists for a security or loan, a quoted price is stale or prices from independent sources vary, a loan or security is generally classified as Level 3.

        Where the Company's principal market for a portfolio of loans is the securitization market, the Company uses the securitization price to determine the fair value of the portfolio. The securitization price is determined from the assumed proceeds of a hypothetical securitization in the current market, adjusted for transformation costs (i.e., direct costs other than transaction costs) and securitization uncertainties such as market conditions and liquidity. As a result of the severe reduction in the level of activity in certain securitization markets since the second half of 2007, observable securitization prices for certain directly comparable portfolios of loans have not been readily available. Therefore, such portfolios of loans are generally classified in Level 3 of the fair-value hierarchy. However, for other loan securitization markets, such as those related to conforming prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate mortgage loans, pricing verification of the hypothetical securitizations has been possible, since these markets have remained active. Accordingly, these loan portfolios are classified as Level 2 in the fair-value hierarchy.

Trading Account Assets and Liabilities—Derivatives

        Exchange-traded derivatives are generally fair valued using quoted market (i.e., exchange) prices and so are classified in Level 1 of the fair-value hierarchy.

        The majority of derivatives entered into by the Company are executed over the counter and so are valued using internal valuation techniques as no quoted market prices exist for such instruments. The valuation techniques and inputs depend on the type of derivative and the nature of the underlying instrument. The principal techniques used to value these instruments are discounted cash flows, Black-Scholes and Monte Carlo simulation. The fair values of derivative contracts reflect cash the Company has paid or received (for example, option premiums paid and received).

        The key inputs depend upon the type of derivative and the nature of the underlying instrument and include interest rate yield curves, foreign-exchange rates, the spot price of the underlying volatility and correlation. The item is placed in either Level 2 or Level 3 depending on the observability of the significant inputs to the model. Correlation and items with longer tenors are generally less observable.

Subprime-Related Direct Exposures in CDOs

        The Company accounts for its CDO super senior subprime direct exposures and the underlying securities on a fair-value basis with all changes in fair value recorded in earnings. Citigroup's CDO super senior subprime direct exposures are not subject to valuation based on observable transactions. Accordingly, the fair value of these exposures is based on management's best estimates based on facts and circumstances as of the date of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

        Citigroup's CDO super senior subprime direct exposures are Level 3 assets. The valuation of the high-grade and mezzanine ABS CDO positions uses trader prices based on the underlying assets of each high-grade and mezzanine ABS CDO. Unlike the ABCP and CDO-squared positions, the high-grade and mezzanine positions are now largely hedged through the ABX and bond short positions, which are, by necessity, trader priced. This results in closer symmetry in the way these long and short positions are valued by the Company. Citigroup intends to use trader marks to value this portion of the portfolio going forward so long as it remains largely hedged.

        The valuation of the ABCP and CDO-squared positions are subject to valuation based on significant unobservable inputs. Fair value of these exposures is based on estimates of future cash flows from the mortgage loans underlying the assets of the ABS CDOs. To determine the performance of the underlying mortgage loan portfolios, the Company estimates the prepayments, defaults and loss severities based on a number of macroeconomic factors, including housing price changes, unemployment rates, interest rates and borrower and loan attributes, such as age, credit scores, documentation status, loan-to-value (LTV) ratios and debt-to-income (DTI) ratios. The model is calibrated using available mortgage loan information including historical loan performance. In addition, the methodology estimates the impact of geographic concentration of mortgages and the impact of reported fraud in the origination of subprime mortgages. An appropriate discount rate is then applied to the cash flows generated for each ABCP and CDO-squared tranche, in order to estimate its fair value under current market conditions.

        When necessary, the valuation methodology used by Citigroup is refined and the inputs used for the purposes of estimation are modified, in part, to reflect ongoing market developments. More specifically, the inputs of home price appreciation (HPA) assumptions and delinquency data were updated along with discount rates that are based upon a weighted average combination of implied spreads from single name ABS bond prices and ABX indices, as well as CLO spreads under current market conditions.

        The housing-price changes were estimated using a forward-looking projection, which incorporated the Loan Performance Index. In addition, the Company's mortgage default model also


Table of Contents

uses recent mortgage performance data, a period of sharp home price declines and high levels of mortgage foreclosures.

        The valuation as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 assumes a cumulative decline in U.S. housing prices from peak to trough of 32.3%30.5%.


Table of Contents

This rate assumes declines of 10% and 3% in 2009 and flat in 2010, respectively, the remainder of the 32.3%30.5% decline having already occurred before the end of 2008.

        In addition, the discount rates were based on a weighted average combination of the implied spreads from single name ABS bond prices, ABX indices and CLO spreads, depending on vintage and asset types. To determine the discount margin, the Company applies the mortgage default model to the bonds underlying the ABX indices and other referenced cash bonds and solves for the discount margin that produces the current market prices of those instruments.

        The primary drivers that currently impact the super senior valuations are the discount rates used to calculate the present value of projected cash flows and projected mortgage loan performance.

        For most of the lending and structuring direct subprime exposures (excluding super seniors), fair value is determined utilizing observable transactions where available, other market data for similar assets in markets that are not active and other internal valuation techniques.

Investments

        The investments category includes available-for-sale debt and marketable equity securities, whose fair value is determined using the same procedures described for trading securities above or, in some cases, using vendor prices as the primary source.

        Also included in investments are nonpublic investments in private equity and real estate entities held by the S&B business. Determining the fair value of nonpublic securities involves a significant degree of management resources and judgment as no quoted prices exist and such securities are generally very thinly traded. In addition, there may be transfer restrictions on private equity securities. The Company uses an established process for determining the fair value of such securities, using commonly accepted valuation techniques, including the use of earnings multiples based on comparable public securities, industry-specific non-earnings-based multiples and discounted cash flow models. In determining the fair value of nonpublic securities, the Company also considers events such as a proposed sale of the investee company, initial public offerings, equity issuances, or other observable transactions.

        Private equity securities are generally classified in Level 3 of the fair-value hierarchy.

Short-Term Borrowings and Long-Term Debt

        Where fair-value accounting has been elected, the fair value of non-structured liabilities is determined by discounting expected cash flows using the appropriate discount rate for the applicable maturity. Such instruments are generally classified in Level 2 of the fair-value hierarchy as all inputs are readily observable.

        The Company determines the fair value of structured liabilities (where performance is linked to structured interest rates, inflation or currency risks) and hybrid financial instruments (performance linked to risks other than interest rates, inflation or currency risks) using the appropriate derivative valuation methodology (described above) given the nature of the embedded risk profile. Such instruments are classified in Level 2 or Level 3 depending on the observability of significant inputs to the model.

Market Valuation Adjustments

        Liquidity adjustments are applied to items in Level 2 and Level 3 of the fair-value hierarchy to ensure that the fair value reflects the price at which the entire position could be liquidated. The liquidity reserve is based on the bid-offer spread for an instrument, adjusted to take into account the size of the position.

        Counterparty credit-risk adjustments are applied to derivatives, such as over-the-counter derivatives, where the base valuation uses market parameters based on the LIBOR interest rate curves. Not all counterparties have the same credit risk as that implied by the relevant LIBOR curve, so it is necessary to consider the market view of the credit risk of a counterparty in order to estimate the fair value of such an item.

        Bilateral or "own" credit-risk adjustments are applied to reflect the Company's own credit risk when valuing derivatives and liabilities measured at fair value, in accordance with the requirements of SFAS 157 (ASC 820-10-35-17 through 35-18).value. Counterparty and own credit adjustments consider the expected future cash flows between Citi and its counterparties under the terms of the instrument and the effect of credit risk on the valuation of those cash flows, rather than a point-in-time assessment of the current recognized net asset or liability. Furthermore, the credit-risk adjustments take into account the effect of credit-risk mitigants, such as pledged collateral and any legal right of offset (to the extent such offset exists) with a counterparty through arrangements such as netting agreements.

Auction Rate Securities

        Auction rate securities (ARS) are long-term municipal bonds, corporate bonds, securitizations and preferred stocks with interest rates or dividend yields that are reset through periodic auctions. The coupon paid in the current period is based on the rate determined by the prior auction. In the event of an auction failure, ARS holders receive a "fail rate" coupon, which is specified by the original issue documentation of each ARS.

        Where insufficient orders to purchase all of the ARS issue to be sold in an auction were received, the primary dealer or auction agent would traditionally have purchased any residual unsold inventory (without a contractual obligation to do so). This residual inventory would then be repaid through subsequent auctions, typically in a short timeframe. Due to this auction mechanism and generally liquid market, ARS have historically traded and were valued as short-term instruments.

        Citigroup acted in the capacity of primary dealer for approximately $72 billion of ARS and continued to purchase residual unsold inventory in support of the auction mechanism until mid-February 2008. After this date, liquidity in the ARS market deteriorated significantly, auctions failed due to a lack of bids from third-party investors, and Citigroup ceased to purchase unsold inventory. Following a number of ARS refinancings, at JuneSeptember 30, 2009, Citigroup continued to act in the capacity of primary dealer for approximately $34$31.5 billion of outstanding ARS.

        The Company classifies its ARS as held-to-maturity, available-for-sale and trading securities.


Table of Contents

        Prior to our first auction's failing in the first quarter of 2008, Citigroup valued ARS based on observation of auction market prices, because the auctions had a short maturity period (7, 28 and 35 days). This generally resulted in valuations at par. Once


Table of Contents

the auctions failed, ARS could no longer be valued using observation of auction market prices. Accordingly, the fair value of ARS is currently estimated using internally developed discounted cash flow valuation techniques specific to the nature of the assets underlying each ARS.

        For ARS with U.S. municipal securities as underlying assets, future cash flows are estimated based on the terms of the securities underlying each individual ARS and discounted at an estimated discount rate in order to estimate the current fair value. The key assumptions that impact the ARS valuations are estimated prepayments and refinancings, estimated fail rate coupons (i.e., the rate paid in the event of auction failure, which varies according to the current credit rating of the issuer) and the discount rate used to calculate the present value of projected cash flows. The discount rate used for each ARS is based on rates observed for straight issuances of other municipal securities. In order to arrive at the appropriate discount rate, these observed rates were adjusted upward to factor in the specifics of the ARS structure being valued, such as callability, and the illiquidity in the ARS market.

        For ARS with student loans as underlying assets, future cash flows are estimated based on the terms of the loans underlying each individual ARS, discounted at an appropriate rate in order to estimate the current fair value. The key assumptions that impact the ARS valuations are the expected weighted average life of the structure, estimated fail rate coupons, the amount of leverage in each structure and the discount rate used to calculate the present value of projected cash flows. The discount rate used for each ARS is based on rates observed for basic securitizations with similar maturities to the loans underlying each ARS being valued. In order to arrive at the appropriate discount rate, these observed rates were adjusted upward to factor in the specifics of the ARS structure being valued, such as callability, and the illiquidity in the ARS market.

        During the first quarter of 2008, ARS for which the auctions failed and where no secondary market has developed were moved to Level 3, as the assets were subject to valuation using significant unobservable inputs. ForThe majority of ARS which are subject to SFAS 157(ASC 820-10) classification, the majority continue to be classified in Level 3.

Alt-A Mortgage Securities

        The Company classifies its Alt-A mortgage securities as held-to-maturity, available-for-sale, and trading investments. The securities classified as trading and available-for-sale are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value reported in current earnings and AOCI, respectively. For these purposes, Alt-A mortgage securities are non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) where (1) the underlying collateral has weighted average FICO scores between 680 and 720 or (2) for instances where FICO scores are greater than 720, RMBS have 30% or less of the underlying collateral composed of full documentation loans.

        Similar to the valuation methodologies used for other trading securities and trading loans, the Company generally determines the fair value of Alt-A mortgage securities utilizing internal valuation techniques. Fair-value estimates from internal valuation techniques are verified, where possible, to prices obtained from independent vendors. Vendors compile prices from various sources. Where available, the Company may also make use of quoted prices for recent trading activity in securities with the same or similar characteristics to that being valued.

        The internal valuation techniques used for Alt-A mortgage securities, as with other mortgage exposures, consider estimated housing price changes, unemployment rates, interest rates and borrower attributes. They also consider prepayment rates as well as other market indicators.

        Alt-A mortgage securities that are valued using these methods are generally classified as Level 2. However, Alt-A mortgage securities backed by Alt-A mortgages of lower quality or more recent vintages are mostly classified in Level 3 due to the reduced liquidity that exists for such positions, which reduces the reliability of prices available from independent sources.

Commercial Real Estate Exposure

        Citigroup reports a number of different exposures linked to commercial real estate at fair value with changes in fair value reported in earnings, including securities, loans and investments in entities that hold commercial real estate loans or commercial real estate directly. The Company also reports securities backed by commercial real estate asAvailable-for-sale investments, which are carried at fair value with changes in fair-value reported in AOCI.

        Similar to the valuation methodologies used for other trading securities and trading loans, the Company generally determines the fair value of securities and loans linked to commercial real estate utilizing internal valuation techniques. Fair-value estimates from internal valuation techniques are verified, where possible, to prices obtained from independent vendors. Vendors compile prices from various sources. Where available, the Company may also make use of quoted prices for recent trading activity in securities or loans with the same or similar characteristics to that being valued. Securities and loans linked to commercial real estate valued using these methodologies are generally classified as Level 3 as a result of the reduced liquidity currently in the market for such exposures.

        The fair value of investments in entities that hold commercial real estate loans or commercial real estate directly is determined using a similar methodology to that used for other non-public investments in real estate held by the S&B business. The Company uses an established process for determining the fair value of such securities, using commonly accepted valuation techniques, including the use of earnings multiples based on comparable public securities, industry-specific non-earnings-based multiples and discounted cash flow models. In determining the fair value of such investments, the Company also considers events, such as a proposed sale of the investee company, initial public offerings, equity issuances, or other observable transactions. Such investments are generally classified in Level 3 of the fair-value hierarchy.


Table of Contents

Highly Leveraged Financing Commitments

        The Company reports approximately $900 million of highly leveraged loans as held for sale, which are measured on a LOCOM basis. The fair value of such exposures is determined, where possible, using quoted secondary-market prices and


Table of Contents

classified in Level 2 of the fair-value hierarchy if there is a sufficient level of activity in the market and quotes or traded prices are available with suitable frequency.

        However, due to the dislocation of the credit markets and the reduced market interest in higher risk/higher yield instruments since the latter half of 2007, liquidity in the market for highly leveraged financings has been limited. Therefore, a majority of such exposures are classified in Level 3 as quoted secondary market prices do not generally exist. The fair value for such exposures is determined using quoted prices for a similar asset or assets, adjusted for the specific attributes of the loan being valued.


Table of Contents

Items Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

        The following tables present for each of the fair-value hierarchy levels the Company's assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. The Company often hedges positions that have been classified in the Level 3 category with financial instruments that have been classified as Level 1 or Level 2. In addition, the Company also hedges items classified in the Level 3 category with instruments classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The effects of these hedges are presented gross in the following table.

In millions of dollars at June 30, 2009 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Gross
inventory
 Netting(1) Net
balance
 
Assets                   
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell $ $108,516 $ $108,516 $(34,761)$73,755 
Trading securities                   
 Trading mortgage-backed securities                   
  U.S. government sponsored   $25,930 $1,244 $27,174 $ $27,174 
  Prime    428  623  1,051    1,051 
  Alt-A    530  777  1,307    1,307 
  Subprime    582  10,001  10,583    10,583 
  Non-U.S. residential    1,241  345  1,586    1,586 
  Commercial    827  2,808  3,635    3,635 
              
 Total trading mortgage-backed securities $ $29,538 $15,798 $45,336 $ $45,336 
              
 U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities                   
  U.S. Treasury $6,766 $2,997 $ $9,763 $ $9,763 
  Agency obligations  1  4,240  49  4,290    4,290 
              
 Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities $6,767 $7,237 $49 $14,053 $ $14,053 
              
 Other trading securities                   
 State and municipal $ $5,947 $109 $6,056   $6,056 
 Foreign government  42,350  14,730  590  57,670    57,670 
 Corporate    46,345  9,435  55,780    55,780 
 Equity securities  30,497  7,569  1,866  39,932    39,932 
 Other debt securities    16,206  16,846  33,052    33,052 
              
Total trading securities $79,614 $127,572 $44,693 $251,879 $ $251,879 
              
Derivatives $5,987 $784,342 $35,896 $826,225  (753,067)$73,158 
              
Investments                   
 Mortgage-backed securities                   
  U.S. government sponsored $1,388 $26,975 $78 $28,441 $ $28,441 
  Prime    5,258  775  6,033    6,033 
  Alt-A    252  271  523    523 
  Subprime      17  17    17 
  Non-U.S. Residential    279    279    279 
  Commercial    70  719  789    789 
              
 Total investment mortgage-backed securities $1,388 $32,834 $1,860 $36,082 $ $36,082 
              
 U.S. Treasury and federal Agency securities                   
   U.S. Treasury $6,401 $1,210 $ $7,611 $ $7,611 
   Agency obligations    16,668  9  16,677    16,677 
              
 Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency $6,401 $17,878 $9  24,288 $ $24,288 
              
 State and municipal $ $17,426 $252 $17,678 $ $17,678 
 Foreign government  35,929  39,057  168  75,154    75,154 
 Corporate    19,633  1,688  21,321    21,321 
 Equity securities  2,796  211  2,818  5,825    5,825 
 Other debt securities  580  1,881  8,429  10,890    10,890 
Non-Marketable equity securities    135  7,800  7,935    7,935 
              
Total investments $47,094 $129,055 $23,024 $199,173 $ $199,173 
              
Loans(2)    1,635  196  1,831    1,831 
Mortgage servicing rights      6,770  6,770    6,770 
Assets of discontinued operations held for sale(3)  3,946  2,101  486  6,533    6,533 
Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis    21,305  1,645  22,950  (3,650) 19,300 
              
Total assets $136,641 $1,174,526 $112,710 $1,423,877 $(791,478)$632,399 
   9.6% 82.5% 7.9% 100.0%      
              

In millions of dollars at September 30, 2009 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Gross
inventory
 Netting(1) Net
balance
 

Assets

                   

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

 $ $114,841 $ $114,841 $(26,955)$87,886 

Trading securities

                   
 

Trading mortgage-backed securities

                   
  

U.S. government sponsored

   $22,387 $1,162 $23,549 $ $23,549 
  

Prime

    719  458  1,177    1,177 
  

Alt-A

    743  562  1,305    1,305 
  

Subprime

    880  9,758  10,638    10,638 
  

Non-U.S. residential

    1,633  290  1,923    1,923 
  

Commercial

    1,244  2,731  3,975    3,975 
              
 

Total trading mortgage-backed securities

 $ $27,606 $14,961 $42,567 $ $42,567 
              
  

U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

                   
  

U.S. Treasury

 $20,527 $276 $ $20,803 $ $20,803 
  

Agency obligations

    3,854  79  3,933    3,933 
              
 

Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

 $20,527 $4,130 $79 $24,736 $ $24,736 
              
 

Other trading securities

                   
 

State and municipal

 $ $6,744 $452 $7,196   $7,196 
 

Foreign government

  48,200  17,781  444  66,425    66,425 
 

Corporate

    38,856  8,629  47,485    47,485 
 

Equity securities

  34,989  10,319  1,155  46,463    46,463 
 

Other debt securities

    20,789  16,366  37,155    37,155 
              

Total trading securities

 $103,716 $126,225 $42,086 $272,027 $ $272,027 
              

Derivatives

 $4,977 $786,659 $30,466 $822,102 $(753,432)$68,670 
              

Investments

                   
 

Mortgage-backed securities

                   
  

U.S. government sponsored

 $1,387 $22,232 $ $23,619 $ $23,619 
  

Prime

    5,405  873  6,278    6,278 
  

Alt-A

    403  67  470    470 
  

Subprime

      19  19    19 
  

Non-U.S. Residential

    266    266    266 
  

Commercial

    45  764  809    809 
              
 

Total investment mortgage-backed securities

 $1,387 $28,351 $1,723 $31,461 $ $31,461 
              
 

U.S. Treasury and federal Agency securities

                   
    

U.S. Treasury

 $4,599 $1,635 $ $6,234 $ $6,234 
    

Agency obligations

    16,963  4  16,967    16,967 
              
 

Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency

 $4,599 $18,598 $4 $23,201 $ $23,201 
              
 

State and municipal

 $ $16,571 $254 $16,825 $ $16,825 
 

Foreign government

  37,313  43,087  271  80,671    80,671 
 

Corporate

    19,303  1,405  20,708    20,708 
 

Equity securities

  3,088  109  2,542  5,739    5,739 
 

Other debt securities

  553  2,492  8,602  11,647    11,647 
 

Non-marketable equity securities

    119  7,646  7,765    7,765 
              

Total investments

 $46,940 $128,630 $22,447 $198,017 $ $198,017 
              

                   

Table of Contents

In millions of dollars at June 30, 2009 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Gross
inventory
 Netting(1) Net balance 
Liabilities                   
Interest-bearing deposits $ $1,995 $112 $2,107 $ $2,107 
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase    143,690  7,204  150,894  (34,761) 116,133 
Trading account liabilities                   
 Securities sold, not yet purchased  36,325  18,478  961  55,764    55,764 
 Derivatives  6,088  768,211  34,716  809,015  (745,467) 63,548 
Short-term borrowings    2,981  377  3,358    3,358 
Long-term debt    13,489  11,201  24,690    24,690 
Liabilities of discontinued operations held for sale(3)  837  1,452    2,289    2,289 
Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis    16,298  19  16,317  (3,650) 12,667 
              
Total liabilities $43,250 $966,594 $54,590 $1,064,434 $(783,878)$280,556 
   4.1% 90.8% 5.1% 100.0%      
              

In millions of dollars at September 30, 2009 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Gross
inventory
 Netting(1) Net
balance
 

Loans(2)

   $1,290 $215 $1,505   $1,505 

Mortgage servicing rights

      6,228  6,228    6,228 

Assets of discontinued operations held for sale(3)

  5,961  2,516  727  9,204    9,204 

Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis

    17,199  1,184  18,383  (4,713)$13,670 
              

Total assets

 $161,594 $1,177,360 $103,353 $1,442,307 $(785,100)$657,207 

  11.2% 81.6% 7.2% 100.0%      
              

Liabilities

                   

Interest-bearing deposits

 $ $1,998 $31 $2,029 $ $2,029 

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

    135,165  8,483  143,648  (26,955) 116,693 

Trading account liabilities

                   
 

Securities sold, not yet purchased

  43,864  22,905  1,219  67,988    67,988 
 

Derivatives

  5,601  772,149  29,934  807,684  (745,132) 62,552 

Short-term borrowings

    1,284  159  1,443    1,443 

Long-term debt

    16,080  11,106  27,186    27,186 

Liabilities of discontinued operations held for sale(3)

  1,302  1,521    2,823    2,823 

Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis

    19,531  1  19,532  (4,713) 14,819 
              

Total liabilities

 $50,767 $970,633 $50,933 $1,072,333 $(776,800)$295,533 

  4.7% 90.6% 4.7% 100.0%      
              

(1)
Represents netting of: (i) the amounts due under securities purchased under agreements to resell and the amounts owed under securities sold under agreements to repurchase, in accordance with FIN 41(ASC 210-20-45-11 through 45-17), and (ii) derivative exposures covered by a qualifying master netting agreement, in accordance with FIN 39 (ASC 815-10-45), cash collateral, and the market value adjustment.

(2)
There is no allowance for loan losses recorded for loans reported at fair value.

(3)
Represents the assets and liabilities of Nikko Cordial businesses sold that are measured at fair value. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Discontinued Operations," for further discussion.

Table of Contents

In millions of dollars at December 31, 2008 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Gross
inventory
 Netting(1) Net
balance
 
Assets                   
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell $ $96,524 $ $96,524 $(26,219)$70,305 
Trading account assets                   
 Trading securities and loans  90,530  121,043  50,773  262,346    262,346 
 Derivatives  9,675  1,102,252  60,725  1,172,652  (1,057,363) 115,289 
Investments  44,342  111,836  28,273  184,451    184,451 
Loans(2)    2,572  160  2,732    2,732 
Mortgage servicing rights      5,657  5,657    5,657 
Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis    25,540  359  25,899  (4,527) 21,372 
              
Total assets $144,547 $1,459,767 $145,947 $1,750,261 $(1,088,109)$662,152 
   8.3% 83.4% 8.3% 100.0%      
              
Liabilities                   
Interest-bearing deposits $ $2,552 $54 $2,606 $ $2,606 
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase    153,918  11,167  165,085  (26,219) 138,866 
Trading account liabilities                   
 Securities sold, not yet purchased  36,848  13,192  653  50,693    50,693 
 Derivatives  10,038  1,096,113  57,139  1,163,290  (1,046,505) 116,785 
Short-term borrowings    16,278  1,329  17,607    17,607 
Long-term debt    16,065  11,198  27,263    27,263 
Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis    16,415  1  16,416  (4,527) 11,889 
              
Total liabilities $46,886 $1,314,533 $81,541 $1,442,960 $(1,077,251)$365,709 
   3.2% 91.1% 5.7% 100.0%      
              

In millions of dollars at December 31, 2008 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Gross
inventory
 Netting(1) Net
balance
 

Assets

                   

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

 $ $96,524 $ $96,524 $(26,219)$70,305 

Trading account assets

                   
 

Trading securities and loans

  90,530  121,043  50,773  262,346    262,346 
 

Derivatives

  9,675  1,102,252  60,725  1,172,652  (1,057,363) 115,289 

Investments

  44,342  111,836  28,273  184,451    184,451 

Loans(2)

    2,572  160  2,732    2,732 

Mortgage servicing rights

      5,657  5,657    5,657 

Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis

    25,540  359  25,899  (4,527) 21,372 
              

Total assets

 $144,547 $1,459,767 $145,947 $1,750,261 $(1,088,109)$662,152 

  8.3% 83.4% 8.3% 100.0%      
              

Liabilities

                   

Interest-bearing deposits

 $ $2,552 $54 $2,606 $ $2,606 

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

    153,918  11,167  165,085  (26,219) 138,866 

Trading account liabilities

                   
 

Securities sold, not yet purchased

  36,848  13,192  653  50,693    50,693 
 

Derivatives

  10,038  1,094,435  57,139  1,161,612  (1,046,505) 115,107 

Short-term borrowings

    16,278  1,329  17,607    17,607 

Long-term debt

    16,065  11,198  27,263    27,263 

Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis

    18,093  1  18,094  (4,527) 13,567 
              

Total liabilities

 $46,886 $1,314,533 $81,541 $1,442,960 $(1,077,251)$365,709 

  3.2% 91.1% 5.7% 100.0%      
              

(1)
Represents netting of: (i) the amounts due under securities purchased under agreements to resell and the amounts owed under securities sold under agreements to repurchase, in accordance with FIN 41(ASC 210-20-45-11 through 45-17), and (ii) derivative exposures covered by a qualifying master netting agreement, in accordance with FIN 39 (ASC 815-10-45), cash collateral, and the market value adjustment.

(2)
There is no allowance for loan losses recorded for loans reported at fair value.

Table of Contents

Changes in Level 3 Fair-Value Category

        The following tables present the changes in the Level 3 fair-value category for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. The Company classifies financial instruments in Level 3 of the fair-value hierarchy when there is reliance on at least one significant unobservable input to the valuation model. In addition to these unobservable inputs, the valuation models for Level 3 financial instruments typically also rely on a number of inputs that are readily observable either directly or indirectly. Thus, the gains and losses presented below include changes in the fair value related to both observable and unobservable inputs.

        The Company often hedges positions with offsetting positions that are classified in a different level. For example, the gains and losses for assets and liabilities in the Level 3 category presented in the tables below do not reflect the effect of offsetting losses and gains on hedging instruments that have been classified by the Company in the Level 1 and Level 2 categories. In addition, the Company hedges items classified in the Level 3 category with instruments also classified in Level 3 of the fair-value hierarchy. The effects of these hedges are presented gross in the following tables.

 
  
 Net realized/ unrealized
gains (losses) included in
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
 Transfers
in and/or
out of
Level 3
 Purchases,
issuances
and
settlements
  
 Unrealized
gains
(losses)
still held(3)
 
In millions of dollars March 31,
2009
 Principal
transactions
 Other(1)(2) June 30,
2009
 
Assets                      
Trading securities                      
 Trading mortgage-backed securities                      
  U.S. government sponsored $1,316 $244 $ $ $(316)$1,244 $268 
  Prime  582  (20)     61  623  (20)
  Alt-A  1,250  (50)     (423) 777  (49)
  Subprime  10,386  667      (1,052) 10,001  645 
  Non-U.S. residential  325  (42)     62  345  (34)
  Commercial  2,883  5      (80) 2,808  (26)
                
 Total trading mortgage-backed securities $16,742 $804 $ $ $(1,748)$15,798 $784 
                
 U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities                      
  U.S. Treasury $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 
  Agency obligations  51      (3) 1  49   
                
 Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities $51 $ $ $(3)$1 $49 $ 
                
 State and municipal $198 $(23)$ $(136)$70 $109 $(23)
 Foreign government  1,011  60    (390) (91) 590  20 
 Corporate  9,382  221    249  (417) 9,435  245 
 Equity securities  1,740  112    104  (90) 1,866  174 
 Other debt securities  13,746  338    109  2,653  16,846  222 
                
Total trading securities $42,870 $1,512 $ $(67)$378 $44,693 $1,422 
                
Derivatives, net(4) $3,539 $(2,492)$ $364 $(231)$1,180 $(2,678)
                
Investments                      
 Mortgage-backed securities                      
  U.S. government sponsored $ $ $ $75 $3 $78 $(2)
  Prime  1,125    159  (171) (338) 775  109 
  Alt-A  177    40  55  (1) 271  29 
  Subprime  12    (3) (10) 18  17  (3)
  Commercial  469    28  (61) 283  719  28 
                
 Total investment mortgage-backed debt securities $1,783 $ $224 $(112)$(35)$1,860 $161 
                
 U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities                      
  U.S. Treasury $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 
  Agency obligations        9    9   
                
 Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities $ $ $ $9 $ $9 $ 
                
 State and municipal $207 $ $ $45 $ $252 $ 
 Foreign government  643      (474) (1) 168   
 Corporate  992    67  (99) 728  1,688  35 
 Equity securities  2,849    49  (7) (73) 2,818  49 
 Other debt securities  8,742    1,243  (386) (1,170) 8,429  1,261 
 Non-Marketable equity securities  7,479    21  619  (319) 7,800  21 
                
Total investments $22,695 $ $1,604 $(405)$(870)$23,024 $1,527 
                
Loans $171 $ $24 $ $1 $196 $25 


Table of Contents

 
  
 Net realized/ unrealized
gains (losses) included in
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
 Transfers
in and/or
out of
Level 3
 Purchases,
issuances
and
settlements
  
 Unrealized
gains
(losses)
still held(3)
 
In millions of dollars March 31,
2009
 Principal
transactions
 Other(1)(2) June 30,
2009
 
Mortgage servicing rights $5,481 $ $1,310 $ $(21)$6,770 $1,310 
Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis  2,515    (1,107) 329  (92) 1,645 $(1,107)
                
Liabilities                      
Interest-bearing deposits $41 $ $(63)$ $8 $112 $(63)
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase  10,732  276    (3,391) 139  7,204  264 
Trading account liabilities                      
 Securities sold, not yet purchased  1,311  8    (434) 92  961  8 
Short-term borrowings  1,030    43  (49) (561) 377  43 
Long-term debt  10,438    (412) 51  300  11,201  (376)
Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis  1    (42)   (24) 19  (19)
                


 
  
 Net realized/ unrealized
gains (losses) included in
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
 Transfers
in and/or
out of
Level 3
 Purchases,
issuances
and
settlements
  
 Unrealized
gains
(losses)
still held(3)
 
In millions of dollars December 31,
2008
 Principal
transactions
 Other(1)(2) June 30,
2009
 
Assets                      
Trading securities                      
 Trading mortgage-backed securities                      
  U.S. government sponsored $1,325 $216 $ $10 $(307)$1,244 $245 
  Prime  147  (55)   439  92  623  15 
  Alt-A  1,153  (119)   (187) (70) 777  (119)
  Subprime  13,844  (1,696)   (710) (1,437) 10,001  (1,648)
  Non-U.S. residential  858  (74)   (490) 51  345  (58)
  Commercial  2,949  (195)   159  (105) 2,808  (220)
                
 Total trading mortgage-backed securities $20,276 $(1,923)$ $(779)$(1,776)$15,798 $(1,785)
                
 U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities                      
  U.S. Treasury $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 
  Agency obligations  59  (9)   (3) 2  49   
                
 Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities $59 $(9)$ $(3)$2 $49 $ 
                
 State and municipal $233 $(22)$ $(80)$(22)$109 $(23)
 Foreign government  1,261  96    (367) (400) 590  82 
 Corporate  13,027  (703)   (792) (2,097) 9,435  221 
 Equity securities  1,387  91    121  267  1,866  222 
 Other debt securities  14,530  11    (1,198) 3,503  16,846  336 
                
Total trading securities $50,773 $(2,459)$ $(3,098)$(523)$44,693 $(947)
                
Derivatives, net(4) $3,586 $(2,376)$ $(717)$687 $1,180 $(2,376)
                
Investments                      
 Mortgage-backed securities                      
  U.S. government sponsored $ $ $ $75 $3 $78 $ 
  Prime  1,163    161  33  (582) 775  161 
  Alt-A  111    33  63  64  271  22 
  Subprime  25    (9) (10) 11  17   
  Commercial  964    9  (463) 209  719  (4)
                
 Total investment mortgage-backed debt securities $2,263 $ $194 $(302)$(295)$1,860 $179 
                
 U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities                      
  U.S. Treasury $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 
  Agency obligations        9    9   
                
 Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities $ $ $ $9 $ $9 $ 
                
 State and municipal $222 $ $ $30 $ $252 $ 
 Foreign government  571      (402) (1) 168   

Table of Contents

 
  
 Net realized/ unrealized
gains (losses) included in
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
 Transfers
in and/or
out of
Level 3
 Purchases,
issuances
and
settlements
  
 Unrealized
gains
(losses)
still held(3)
 
In millions of dollars December 31,
2008
 Principal
transactions
 Other(1)(2) June 30,
2009
 
 Corporate $1,019 $ $44 $654 $(29)$1,688 $35 
 Equity securities  3,807    (480) (130) (379) 2,818  (480)
 Other debt securities  11,324    (427) (948) (1,520) 8,429  (427)
 Non-Marketable equity securities  9,067    (706) (239) (322) 7,800  (779)
                
Total investments $28,273 $ $(1,375)$(1,328)$(2,546)$23,024 $(1,472)
                
Loans $160 $ $19 $ $17 $196 $19 
Mortgage servicing rights  5,657    1,440    (327) 6,770  1,440 
Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis  359    552  756  (22) 1,645  552 
                
Liabilities                      
Interest-bearing deposits $54 $ $(59)$ $(1)$112 $(94)
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase  11,167  308    (3,720) 65  7,204  301 
Trading account liabilities                      
 Securities sold, not yet purchased  653  44    (15) 367  961  43 
Short-term borrowings  1,329    (65) (746) (271) 377  (65)
Long-term debt  11,198    36  (326) 365  11,201  (50)
Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis  1    (43)   (25) 19  (43)
                


 
  
 Net realized/ unrealized
gains (losses) included in
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
 Transfers
in and/or
out of
Level 3
 Purchases,
issuances
and
settlements
  
 Unrealized
gains
(losses)
still held(3)
 
In millions of dollars March 31,
2008
 Principal
transactions
 Other(1)(2) June 30,
2008
 
Assets                      
Securities purchased under agreements to resell $16 $ $ $ $(16)$ $ 
Trading account assets                      
 Trading securities and loans  90,672  (4,775)   793  (9,871) 76,819  (4,445)
Investments  20,539    (211) (461) 7,219  27,086  6 
Loans  93  5      47  145  5 
Mortgage servicing rights  7,716    1,317    (99) 8,934  1,317 
Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis  812    30  588  21  1,451  25 
                
Liabilities                      
Interest-bearing deposits $105 $(10)$ $ $(4)$111 $(5)
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase  6,208  210    (2,710) (122) 3,166  51 
Trading account liabilities                      
 Securities sold, not yet purchased  1,817  (13)   (40) (72) 1,718  (63)
 Derivatives, net(4)  952  1,323    (969) 1,442  102  (2)
Short-term borrowings  6,150  219    (3,791) (980) 1,160  82 
Long-term debt  47,199  246    65  (8,663) 38,355  136 
Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis      (15)   11  26  16 
                
 
  
 Net realized/ unrealized
gains (losses) included in
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
 Transfers
in and/or
out of
Level 3
 Purchases,
issuances
and
settlements
  
 Unrealized
gains
(losses)
still held(3)
 
In millions of dollars June 30,
2009
 Principal
transactions
 Other(1)(2) Sept. 30,
2009
 

Assets

                      

Trading securities

                      
 

Trading mortgage-backed securities

                      
  

U.S. government sponsored

 $1,244 $(71)$ $127 $(138)$1,162 $(116)
  

Prime

  623  (76)   (39) (50) 458  (37)
  

Alt-A

  777  18    (75) (158) 562  18 
  

Subprime

  10,001  1,752    (515) (1,480) 9,758  1,785 
  

Non-U.S. residential

  345  (3)   (142) 90  290  (3)
  

Commercial

  2,808  (1)   114  (190) 2,731  2 
                
 

Total trading mortgage-backed securities

 $15,798 $1,619 $ $(530)$(1,926)$14,961 $1,649 
                
 

U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

                      
  

U.S. Treasury

 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 
  

Agency obligations

  49  9    5  16  79  9 
                
 

Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

 $49 $9 $ $5 $16 $79 $9 
                
 

State and municipal

 $109 $(49)$ $300 $92 $452 $(49)
 

Foreign government

  590  24    (134) (36) 444  4 
 

Corporate

  9,435  404    (764) (446) 8,629  431 
 

Equity securities

  1,866  161    (899) 27  1,155  25 
 

Other debt securities

  16,846  1,133     (1,122) (491) 16,366  1,018 
                

Total trading securities

 $44,693 $3,301 $ $(3,144)$(2,764)$42,086 $3,087 
                

Derivatives, net(4)

 $1,180 $(2,407)$ $(1,107)$2,866 $532 $(3,064)
                

Investments

                      
 

Mortgage-backed securities

                      
  

U.S. government sponsored

 $78 $ $1 $ $(79)$ $1 
  

Prime

  775    50  99  (51) 873  59 
  

Alt-A

  271    11  (114) (101) 67  16 
  

Subprime

  17      2    19   
  

Commercial

  719    62  2  (19) 764  14 
                
 

Total investment mortgage-backed debt securities

 $1,860 $ $124 $(11)$(250)$1,723 $90 
                
 

U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

                      
  

U.S. Treasury

 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 
  

Agency obligations

  9        (5) 4   
                
 

Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

 $9 $ $ $ $(5)$4 $ 
                
 

State and municipal

 $252 $ $2 $ $ $254 $ 
 

Foreign government

  168      89  14  271   
 

Corporate

  1,688    3  (86) (200) 1,405 $5 
 

Equity securities

  2,818    (15) (22) (239) 2,542  10 
 

Other debt securities

  8,429    523  (194) (156) 8,602  454 
 

Non-marketable equity securities

  7,800    (40) (8) (106) 7,646  (226)
                

Total investments

 $23,024 $ $597 $(232)$(942)$22,447 $333 
                

Table of Contents


 
  
 Net realized/ unrealized
gains (losses) included in
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
 Transfers
in and/or
out of
Level 3
 Purchases,
issuances
and
settlements
  
 Unrealized
gains
(losses)
still held
 
In millions of dollars December 31,
2007
 Principal
transactions
 Other June 30, 2008 
Assets                      
Securities purchased under agreements to resell $16 $ $ $ $(16)$ $ 
Trading account assets                      
 Trading securities and loans  75,573  (13,191)   18,745  (4,308) 76,819  (10,556)
Investments  17,060    (1,547) 2,971  8,602  27,086  (267)
Loans  9  11      125  145  11 
Mortgage servicing rights  8,380    964    (410) 8,934  964 
Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis  1,171    47  69  164  1,451  58 
                
Liabilities                      
Interest-bearing deposits $56 $(19)$ $13 $23 $111 $(11)
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase  6,158  71    (2,366) (555) 3,166  (6)
Trading account liabilities                      
 Securities sold, not yet purchased  473  (8)   632  605  1,718  (36)
 Derivatives, net  2,470  2,797    106  323  102  3,868 
Short-term borrowings  5,016  149    (2,283) (1,424) 1,160  56 
Long-term debt  8,953  409    38,019  (8,208) 38,355  (108)
Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis  1    (14)   11  26  6 
                

 
  
 Net realized/ unrealized
gains (losses) included in
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
 Transfers
in and/or
out of
Level 3
 Purchases,
issuances
and
settlements
  
 Unrealized
gains
(losses)
still held(3)
 
In millions of dollars June 30,
2009
 Principal
transactions
 Other(1)(2) Sept. 30,
2009
 

Loans

 $196 $ $24 $ $(5)$215 $24 

Mortgage servicing rights

 $6,770 $ $(444)$ $(98)$6,228 $(444)

Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis

  1,645    (347) (67) (47) 1,184 $(347)
                

Liabilities

                      

Interest-bearing deposits

 $112 $ $63 $ $(18)$31 $63 

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

  7,204  (32)   1,622  (375) 8,483  (40)

Trading account liabilities

                      
 

Securities sold, not yet purchased

  961  (14)   (166) 410  1,219  15 

Short-term borrowings

  377    9  (75) (134) 159  9 

Long-term debt

  11,201    (385) 414  (894) 11,106  (456)

Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis

  19    (2)   (20) 1  (1)
                


 
  
 Net realized/ unrealized
gains (losses) included in
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
 Transfers
in and/or
out of
Level 3
 Purchases,
issuances
and
settlements
  
 Unrealized
gains
(losses)
still held(3)
 
In millions of dollars December 31,
2008
 Principal
transactions
 Other(1)(2) Sept. 30,
2009
 

Assets

                      

Trading securities

                      
  

Trading mortgage-backed securities

                      
   

U.S. government sponsored

 $1,325 $145 $ $137 $(445)$1,162 $89 
   

Prime

  147  (131)   400  42  458  (83)
   

Alt-A

  1,153  (101)   (262) (228) 562  (101)
   

Subprime

  13,844  56    (1,225) (2,917) 9,758  2,262 
   

Non-U.S. residential

  858  (77)   (632) 141  290  12 
   

Commercial

  2,949  (196)   273  (295) 2,731  (207)
                
  

Total trading mortgage-backed securities

 $20,276 $(304)$ $(1,309)$(3,702)$14,961 $1,972 
                
  

U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

                      
   

U.S. Treasury

 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 
   

Agency obligations

  59      2  18  79  2 
                
  

Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

 $59 $ $ $2 $18 $79 $2 
                
  

State and municipal

 $233 $(71)$ $220 $70 $452 $(49)
  

Foreign government

  1,261  120    (501) (436) 444  29 
  

Corporate

  13,027  (299)   (1,556) (2,543) 8,629  457 
  

Equity securities

  1,387  252    (778) 294  1,155  90 
  

Other debt securities

  14,530  1,144    (2,320) 3,012  16,366  1,044 
                

Total trading securities

 $50,773 $842 $ $(6,242)$(3,287)$42,086 $3,545 
                

Derivatives, net(4)

 $3,586 $(4,783)$ $(1,824)$3,553 $532 $(3,026)
                

Investments

                      
  

Mortgage-backed securities

                      
   

U.S. government sponsored

 $ $ $1 $75 $(76)$ $3 
   

Prime

  1,163    211  132  (633) 873  213 
   

Alt-A

  111    44  (51) (37) 67  17 
   

Subprime

  25    (9) (8) 11  19   
   

Commercial

  964    71  (461) 190  764  29 
                
  

Total investment mortgage-backed debt securities

 $2,263 $ $318 $(313)$(545)$1,723 $262 
                
  

U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

                      
   

U.S. Treasury

 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 
   

Agency obligations

        9  (5) 4   
                
  

Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

 $ $ $ $9 $(5)$4 $ 
                

Table of Contents


 
  
 Net realized/ unrealized
gains (losses) included in
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
 Transfers
in and/or
out of
Level 3
 Purchases,
issuances
and
settlements
  
 Unrealized
gains
(losses)
still held(3)
 
In millions of dollars December 31,
2008
 Principal
transactions
 Other(1)(2) Sept. 30,
2009
 
  

State and municipal

 $222 $ $2 $30 $ $254 $ 
  

Foreign government

  571      (313) 13  271  (1)
  

Corporate

  1,019    47  568  (229) 1,405  40 
  

Equity securities

  3,807    (495) (152) (618) 2,542  (34)
  

Other debt securities

  11,324    96  (1,142) (1,676) 8,602  643 
  

Non-marketable equity securities

  9,067    (746) (247) (428) 7,646  (238)
                

Total investments

 $28,273 $ $(778)$(1,560)$(3,488)$22,447 $672 
                

Loans

 $160 $ $43 $ $12 $215 $24 

Mortgage servicing rights

 $5,657 $ $996 $ $(425)$6,228 $996 

Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis

  359    205  689  (69) 1,184 $205 
                

Liabilities

                      

Interest-bearing deposits

 $54 $ $4 $ $(19)$31 $49 

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

  11,167  276    (2,098) (310) 8,483  (320)

Trading account liabilities

                      
  

Securities sold, not yet purchased

  653  30    (181) 777  1,219  25 

Short-term borrowings

  1,329    (56) (821) (405) 159  (72)

Long-term debt

  11,198    (349) 88  (529) 11,106  (215)

Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis

  1    (45)   (45) 1   
                


 
  
 Net realized/ unrealized
gains (losses) included in
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
  
 Purchases,
issuances
and
settlements
  
 Unrealized
gains
(losses)
still held(3)
 
In millions of dollars June 30,
2008
 Principal
transactions
 Other(1)(2) Transfers
in and/or
out of Level 3
 September 30,
2008
 

Assets

                      

Trading account assets

                      
 

Trading securities and loans

 $76,819 $(5,640)$ $13,283 $857 $85,319 $(5,439)

Investments

  27,086    (1,287) 3,818  (1,381) 28,236  (1,190)

Loans

  145  (14)     24  155  (22)

Mortgage servicing rights

  8,934    (396)   (192) 8,346  (396)

Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis

  1,451    (26) 353  (102) 1,676  (3)
                

Liabilities

                      

Interest-bearing deposits

 $111 $10 $ $ $(17)$84 $8 

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

  3,166  (159)   73  (579) 2,819  (39)

Trading account liabilities

                      
 

Securities sold, not yet purchased

  1,718  3    366  (950) 1,131  34 
 

Derivatives, net(4)

  102  2,904    3,072  2,878  3,148  3,092 

Short-term borrowings

  1,160  54    511  274  1,891  38 

Long-term debt

  38,355  940    3,277  (6,877) 33,815  403 

Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis

  26    (45)   (46) 25  (45)
                

Table of Contents


 
  
 Net realized/ unrealized
gains (losses) included in
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
 Transfers
in and/or
out of
Level 3
 Purchases,
issuances
and
settlements
  
 Unrealized
gains
(losses)
still held(3)
 
In millions of dollars December 31,
2007
 Principal
transactions
 Other(1)(2) September 30,
2008
 

Assets

                      

Securities purchased under agreements to resell

 $16 $ $ $ $(16)$ $ 

Trading account assets

                      
 

Trading securities and loans

  75,573  (18,831)   32,028  (3,451) 85,319  (14,065)

Investments

  17,060    (2,834) 6,789  7,221  28,236  (1,268)

Loans

  9  (3)     149  155  (2)

Mortgage servicing rights

  8,380    568    (602) 8,346  568 

Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis

  1,171    21  422  62  1,676  21 
                

Liabilities

                      

Interest-bearing deposits

 $56 $(9)$ $13 $6 $84 $(3)

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

  6,158  (88)   (2,293) (1,134) 2,819  45 

Trading account liabilities

                      
 

Securities sold, not yet purchased

  473  (5)   998  (345) 1,131  118 
 

Derivatives, net(4)

  2,470  5,701    3,178  3,201  3,148  3,638 

Short-term borrowings

  5,016  203    (1,772) (1,150) 1,891  110 

Long-term debt

  8,953  1,349    41,296  (15,085) 33,815  875 

Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis

  1    (59)   (35) 25  (5)
                

(1)
Changes in fair value for available-for-sale investments (debt securities) are recorded inAccumulated other comprehensive income, while gains and losses from sales are recorded inRealized gains (losses) from sales of investments on the Consolidated Statement of Income.

(2)
Unrealized gains (losses) on MSRs are recorded inCommissions and fees on the Consolidated Statement of Income.

(3)
Represents the amount of total gains or losses for the period, included in earnings (andAccumulated other comprehensive income for changes in fair value for available-for-sale investments), attributable to the change in fair value relating to assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 that are still held at JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008.

(4)
Total Level 3 derivative exposures have been netted in these tables for presentation purposes only.

Table of Contents

        The following is a discussion of the changes to the Level 3 balances for each of the roll-forward tables presented above.

        The significant changes from March 31,June 30, 2009 to JuneSeptember 30, 2009 Level 3 assets and liabilities are due to:

    A net increasedecrease in trading securities of $1.8$2.6 billion that was driven by netby:

    (i)
    Net realized / unrealized gains of $1.5$3.3 billion recorded inPrincipal transactions, composed mainly of gains on subprime mortgage-backed securities U.S. government sponsored mortgage-backed securities, corporate debt securities($1.7 billion) and other debt securities;securities ($1.1 billion);

    (ii)
    Net transfers to Level 2 of $3.1 billion, which relates mainly to securities issued by credit card securitization trusts, for which significant inputs into valuations became more readily observable during the quarter;

    (iii)
    Net settlements of $2.8 billion, including liquidations of subprime trading securities of $1.5 billion during the third quarter.

    A net increase in federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase of $1.3 billion. This was driven mainly by transfers to Level 3 during the third quarter of $1.6 billion, and relates to structured repurchase agreements with longer effective maturity dates.

The significant changes from December 31, 2008 to September 30, 2009 Level 3 assets and liabilities are due to:

    A net decrease in trading derivativessecurities of $8.7 billion that was mainly driven by:

    (i)
    Net transfers of $6.2 billion to Level 2 inventory, including corporate debt ($1.6 billion) and subprime trading securities ($1.2 billion) and other debt trading securities ($2.3 billion). The transfer of other debt securities to Level 2 was mainly due to securities issued by credit card securitization trusts, for which was driven by netsignificant inputs into valuations became more readily observable;

    (ii)
    Net realized / unrealized lossesgains of $2.5$0.8 billion recorded inPrincipal transactions,.

    (iii)
    Net settlements of $3.3 billion, primarily due to liquidations of subprime trading securities of $2.9 billion.

    A net decrease in investments of $5.8 billion that resulted from:

    (i)
    Net realized / unrealized losses recorded in other income of $0.8 billion, due primarily to losses on private equity investments and real estate fund investments;

    (ii)
    Net settlements of investment securities of $3.5 billion due to pay-downs and sales.

    (iii)
    Net transfers of $1.5 billion of investments to Level 2.

        A decrease in trading derivatives of $3.1 billion includes net realized and unrealized losses of $4.8 billion recorded inPrincipal transactions, mainly on complex derivative contracts such as those linked to credit and equity exposures. These losses are partially offset by gains recognized on instruments that have been classified in Levels 1 and 2.

The significantfollowing is a discussion of the changes from December 31, 2008 to June 30, 2009the Level 3 assets and liabilities are due to:balances for each of the rollforward tables presented above.

    A net decrease in trading securities of $6.1 billion that was mainly driven by:

    (i)
    Net realized / unrealized losses of $2.4 billion recorded inPrincipal transactions, mainly composed of write-downs on subprime mortgage-backed securities;

    (ii)
    Net transfers of $3.1 billion to Level 2 inventory as a result of better vendor pricing coverage for corporate debt.

    A decrease in investments of $5.3 billion that primarily resulted from:

    (i)
    Net realized / unrealized losses recorded in other income of $1.4 billion mainly driven by $1.6 billion in losses on hedged senior debt securities retained from the sale of a portfolio of highly leveraged loans; as well as losses on private equity investments and real estate fund investments. Offsetting this loss on the retained highly leveraged debt securities is a gain on the corresponding cash flow hedge that is reflected in AOCI and on the line Other Financial Assets measured on a recurring basis within the fair value hierarchy table presented above as a Level 3 asset.

    (ii)
    Net settlements of investment securities of $2.5 billion mainly due to pay-downs during the quarter.

    (iii)
    Net transfers of $1.4 billion of investments to Level 2.

    A decrease in trading derivatives was driven by net realized and unrealized losses of $2.4 billion recorded inPrincipal transactions, mainly on complex derivative contracts such as those linked to credit and equity exposures. These losses are partially offset by gains recognized on instruments that have been classified in Levels 1 and 2.

    For the period March 31,June 30, 2008 to JuneSeptember 30, 2008, the changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities are due to:

    (i)
    The decreaseincrease in trading account assetssecurities and loans of $14$8.5 billion, which was driven primarily by the net transfer of $13.3 billion of trading assets into Level 3, including ABS securities, warehouse loans backed by auto lease receivables, and certificates issued by the U.S. credit card securitization trust that are retained by the Company. This was offset by various write-downs on ABS-CDO super senior exposures plus approximately $9recognized by the Company during the quarter.

    The increase in net derivative trading account liabilities of $3.0 billion was due to $3.1 billion of net transfers into Level 3, as illiquid markets continued to negatively impact the availability of observable pricing inputs. $2.9 billion of net additions was offset by $2.9 billion of mark-to-market gains. A portion of these gains was offset by losses recognized for positions classified in Level 2.

    The decrease in long-term debt of $4.5 billion as maturities of the consolidated SIV's debt was offset by the transfer of certain debt obligations from Level 2 to Level 3. Long-term debt was also reduced by mark-to-market gains, driven by the widening of Company's own-credit spreads.

    The significant changes from December 31, 2007 to September 30, 2008 in Level 3 assets and liabilities are due to:

    A net increase in trading securities and loans of $9.7 billion as net write-downs recognized on various trading securities and net reductions from settlements/sales were more than offset by the net transfer of trading securities including CDO liquidations.into Level 3. The continued lack of availability of observable pricing inputs was the primary cause of this net transfer.

    (ii)
    The increase in investments of $7$11.2 billion which was largely due toprimarily resulted from the $8.7 billion ofin senior debt securities retained from the Company's April 17, 2008 sale of a corporate loan portfolio that included highly leverage loans, offset by net sales/settlementsleveraged loans. In addition, $1.4 billion of other investments.


(iii)
The increase in MSR

Table of $1.3 billion, which resulted from the mark-to-market gain recognized of $1.4 billion. This gain was offsetContents

certificates issued by the decrease of $2.1 billion in the value of the related non-Level 3 hedges.

(iv)
The reductions in securities sold under agreement to repurchase of $3 billion,U.S credit card securitization trust and short-term borrowings of $5 billion, which were driven primarilyretained by the transfers of certain positionsCompany were transferred from Level 3 to Level 2 as valuation methodology inputs considered to be unobservable were demonstrated to be insignificant to the overall valuation.

(v)
The decrease in long-term debt of $9 billion, as payments were made against the consolidated SIV's long-term debt.

The significant changes from December 31, 2007 to June 30, 2008 in Level 3 assets and liabilities are due to:

(i)
A minimal net increase in trading securities as net write-downs recognized for ABSCDO super senior exposures and Alt-A mortgage securities, plus a net reduction from settlements/sales of trading securities, were offset by a net transfer-in to Level 3 from Level 2 as prices and other valuation inputs became unobservable for a numberduring the third quarter of positions including auction rate securities and Alt-A mortgage securities.

2008.

      (ii)
      The increase in investments of $10 billion, which was due primarily to $8.7 billion of senior debt securities retained from the Company's April 17, 2008 sale of a corporate loan portfolio that included highly leverage loans.

      (iii)
      The reduction in securities sold under agreement to repurchase of $3$3.3 billion, which was primarily driven by the transfer of positions from Level 3 to Level 2 as valuation methodology inputs considered to be unobservable were demonstrateddetermined to be insignificant to the overall valuation.

      (iv)
      The decrease in short-term borrowings of $4$3.1 billion, which was primarily due to net transfers out of $2$1.8 billion as valuation methodology inputs considered to be unobservable were demonstrateddetermined to be insignificant to the overall valuation, and payments of $1$1.2 billion against the consolidated SIV's short-term debt.debt obligations.

      (v)
      The increase in long-term debt of $29$24.9 billion which was driven by the transfer of consolidated SIV liabilities to Level 3 due to the lack of observable inputs, offset by the payments made against this debt in the second quarterand third quarters of 2008.

Items Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

        Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and therefore are not included in the tables above. These include assets measured at cost that have been written down to fair value during the periods as a result of an impairment. In addition, assets such as loans held for sale that are measured at the lower of cost or market (LOCOM) that were recognized at fair value below cost at the end of the period.

        The fair value of loans measured on a LOCOM basis is determined where possible using quoted secondary-market prices. Such loans are generally classified in Level 2 of the fair-value hierarchy given the level of activity in the market and the frequency of available quotes. If no such quoted price exists, the fair value of a loan is determined using quoted prices for a similar asset or assets, adjusted for the specific attributes of that loan.

        The following table presents all loans held-for-sale that are carried at LOCOM as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (in billions):

 
 Aggregate
Cost
 Fair
Value
 Level 2 Level 3 

June 30, 2009

 $0.3 $0.1 $0.1 $ 

December 31, 2008

  3.1  2.1  0.8  1.3 
  

 
 Aggregate
Cost
 Fair
Value
 Level 2 Level 3 

September 30, 2009

 $2.8 $1.6 $0.5 $1.1 

December 31, 2008

  3.1  2.1  0.8  1.3 
          

Table of Contents


18.    FAIR-VALUE ELECTIONS (SFAS 155/ASC 815-15-25, SFAS 156/ASC 860-50-35 and SFAS 159/ASC 825-10)

        Under SFAS 159 (ASC 825-10), theThe Company may elect to report most financial instruments and certain other items at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis with changes in fair value reported in earnings. After the initial adoption, the election is made upon the acquisition of an eligible financial asset, financial liability or firm commitment or when certain specified reconsideration events occur. The fair-value election may not be revoked once an election is made.

        Additionally, the transition provisions of SFAS 159 (ASC 825-10)ASC 825-10 (SFAS 159) permit a one-time election for existing positions at the adoption date with a cumulative-effect adjustment included in opening retained earnings and future changes in fair value reported in earnings.

        The Company also has elected to adopt the fair-value accounting provisions permitted under SFAS 155 (ASC 815-15-25) and SFAS 156 (ASC 860-50-35) for certain assets and liabilities. In accordance with SFAS 155 (ASC 815-15-25), which was primarily adopted on a prospective basis, hybridliabilities prospectively. Hybrid financial instruments, such as structured notes containing embedded derivatives that otherwise would require bifurcation, as well as certain interest-only instruments, may be accounted for at fair value if the Company makes an irrevocable election to do so on an instrument-by-instrument basis. The changes in fair value are recorded in current earnings. Additional discussion regarding the applicable areas in which SFAS 155 (ASC 815-15-25) was adoptedfair value elections were made is presented in Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

        SFAS 156 (ASC 860-50-35) requires allAll servicing rights tomust now be recognized initially at fair value. At its initial adoption, the standard permits a one-time irrevocable election to re-measure each class of servicing rights at fair value, with the changes in fair value recorded in current earnings. The classes of servicing rights are identified based on the availability of market inputs used in determining their fair values and the methods for managing their risks. The Company has elected fair-value accounting for its mortgage and student loan classes of servicing rights. The impact of adopting this standard was not material. See Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussions regarding the accounting and reporting of mortgage servicing rights.


Table of Contents

        The following table presents, as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009, the fair value of those positions selected for fair-value accounting, in accordance with SFAS 159 (ASC 825-10), SFAS 156 (ASC 860-50-35), and SFAS 155 (ASC 815-15-25), as well as the changes in fair value for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and JuneSeptember 30, 2008.

 
 Fair Value at Changes in fair value gains
(losses) for six months ended
June 30,
 
In millions of dollars June 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 2009 2008(1) 
Assets             
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell Selected portfolios of securities purchased under agreements to resell, securities borrowed(2) $73,755 $70,305 $(1,256)$120 
          
Trading account assets:             
 Legg Mason convertible preferred equity securities originally classified as available-for-sale $ $ $ $(13)
 Selected letters of credit hedged by credit default swaps or participation notes  3    36  (2)
 Certain credit products  15,101  16,254  3,963  (1,172)
 Certain hybrid financial instruments  11  33    3 
 Retained interests from asset securitizations  2,285  3,026  1,279  307 
          
Total trading account assets $17,400 $19,313 $5,278 $(877)
          
Investments:             
 Certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures $387 $469 $(44)$(12)
 Other  230  295  (85) (20)
          
Total investments $617 $764 $(129)$(32)
          
Loans:             
 Certain credit products $1,373 $2,315 $8 $(11)
 Certain mortgage loans  32  36  (4) (8)
 Certain hybrid financial instruments  426  381  (37) (23)
          
Total loans $1,831 $2,732 $(33)$(42)
          
Other assets:             
 Mortgage servicing rights $6,770 $5,657 $1,440 $964 
 Certain mortgage loans  8,115  4,273  27  (48)
 Certain equity method investments  764  936  94  (110)
          
Total other assets $15,649 $10,866 $1,561 $806 
          
Total $109,252 $103,980 $5,421 $(25)
          
Liabilities             
Interest-bearing deposits:             
 Certain structured liabilities $246 $320 $1 $10 
 Certain hybrid financial instruments  1,861  2,286  (431) 297 
          
Total interest-bearing deposits $2,107 $2,606 $(430)$307 
          
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase             
 Selected portfolios of securities sold under agreements to repurchase, securities loaned(2) $116,133 $138,866 $215 $(10)
          
Trading account liabilities:             
 Selected letters of credit hedged by credit default swaps or participation notes $ $72 $37 $ 
 Certain hybrid financial instruments  5,745  4,679  (772) 1,058 
          
Total trading account liabilities $5,745 $4,751 $(735)$1,058 
          
Short-term borrowings:             
 Certain non-collateralized short-term borrowings $240 $2,303 $73 $9 
 Certain hybrid financial instruments  648  2,112  (27) 69 
 Certain structured liabilities  3  3     
 Certain non-structured liabilities  2,467  13,189  (24)  
          
Total short-term borrowings $3,358 $17,607 $22 $78 
          
Long-term debt:             
 Certain structured liabilities $3,069 $3,083 $81 $230 
 Certain non-structured liabilities  6,164  7,189  101  2,423 
 Certain hybrid financial instruments  15,457  16,991  (222) 713 
          
Total long-term debt $24,690 $27,263 $(40)$3,366 
          
Total $152,033 $191,093 $(968)$4,799 
          

 
 Fair Value at Changes in fair value gains
(losses) for nine months ended
September 30,
 
In millions of dollars September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 2009 2008(1) 

Assets

             

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

             
 

Selected portfolios of securities purchased under agreements to resell, securities borrowed(2)

 $87,886 $70,305 $(1,284)$675 
          

Trading account assets:

             

Legg Mason convertible preferred equity securities originally classified as available-for-sale

 $ $ $ $(13)
 

Selected letters of credit hedged by credit default swaps or participation notes

  28    61  (2)
 

Certain credit products

  16,695  16,254  5,461  (1,143)
 

Certain hybrid financial instruments

  6  33    3 
 

Retained interests from asset securitizations

  2,153  3,026  1,522  (521)
          

Total trading account assets

 $18,882 $19,313 $7,044 $(1,676)
          

Investments:

             
 

Certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures

 $359 $469 $(52)$(54)
 

Other

  237  295  (83) (60)
          

Total investments

 $596 $764 $(135)$(114)
          

Loans:

             
 

Certain credit products

 $997 $2,315 $26 $(54)
 

Certain mortgage loans

  30  36  (2) (22)
 

Certain hybrid financial instruments

  478  381  54  5 
          

Total loans

 $1,505 $2,732 $78 $(71)
          

Other assets:

             
 

Mortgage servicing rights

 $6,228 $5,657 $996 $568 
 

Certain mortgage loans

  2,857  4,273  81  21 
 

Certain equity method investments

  769  936  174  (154)
          

Total other assets

 $9,854 $10,866 $1,251 $435 
          

Total

 $118,723 $103,980 $6,954 $(751)
          

Liabilities

             

Interest-bearing deposits:

             
 

Certain structured liabilities

 $234 $320 $ $ 
 

Certain hybrid financial instruments

  1,795  2,286  (562) 557 
          

Total interest-bearing deposits

 $2,029 $2,606 $(562)$557 
          

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

             
 

Selected portfolios of securities sold under agreements to repurchase, securities loaned(2)

 $116,693 $138,866 $213 $(44)
          

Trading account liabilities:

             
 

Selected letters of credit hedged by credit default swaps or participation notes

 $ $72 $37 $ 
 

Certain hybrid financial instruments

  5,980  4,679  (1,798) 2,618 
          

Total trading account liabilities

 $5,980 $4,751 $(1,761)$2,618 
          

Short-term borrowings:

             
 

Certain non-collateralized short-term borrowings

 $188 $2,303 $50 $45 
 

Certain hybrid financial instruments

  523  2,112  (84) 176 
 

Certain structured liabilities

  3  3    10 
 

Certain non-structured liabilities

  729  13,189  (33)  
          

Total short-term borrowings

 $1,443 $17,607 $(67)$231 
          

Long-term debt:

             
 

Certain structured liabilities

 $3,395 $3,083 $(64)$446 
 

Certain non-structured liabilities

  7,510  7,189  (102) 3,441 
 

Certain hybrid financial instruments

  16,281  16,991  (1,572) 2,335 
          

Total long-term debt

 $27,186 $27,263 $(1,738)$6,222 
          

Total

 $153,331 $191,093 $(3,915)$9,584 
          

(1)
Reclassified to conform to current period's presentation.

(2)
Reflects netting of the amounts due from securities purchased under agreements to resell and the amounts owed under securities sold under agreements to repurchase in accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 41, "Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Repurchase and Reverse Repurchase Agreements" (FIN 41/ASC 210-20-45-11 through 45-17).repurchase.

Table of Contents

Own-Credit Valuation Adjustment

        The fair value of debt liabilities for which the fair-value option was elected (other than non-recourse and similar liabilities) was impacted by the narrowing of the Company's credit spread. The estimated change in the fair value of these debt liabilities due to such changes in the Company's own credit risk (or instrument-specific credit risk) was a loss of $1.608$1.019 billion and $228 milliona gain of $1.525 billion for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and JuneSeptember 30, 2008, respectively, and a loss of $1.428$2.447 billion and a gain of $1.051$2.577 billion for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and JuneSeptember 30, 2008, respectively. Changes in fair value resulting from changes in instrument-specific credit risk were estimated by incorporating the Company's current observable credit spreads into the relevant valuation technique used to value each liability as described above.

        During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company changed the source of its credit spreads from those observed in the credit default swap market to those observed in the bond market. Had this modification been in place since the beginning of 2008, the change in the Company's own credit spread would have resulted in a lossgain of $60 million$2.48 billion and a gain of $1.19$3.53 billion for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, respectively.

SFAS 159 The Fair-Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (ASC 825-10)

Legg Mason convertible preferred equity securities

        The Legg Mason convertible preferred equity securities (Legg shares) were acquired in connection with the sale of Citigroup's Asset Management business in December 2005. Prior to the election of fair-value option accounting, the shares were classified as available-for-sale securities with the unrealized loss of $232 million as of December 31, 2006 included inAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss). In connection with the Company's adoption of SFAS 159 (ASC 825-10), thisThis unrealized loss was recorded upon election of a fair value as a reduction of January 1, 2007Retained earnings as part of the cumulative-effect adjustment.

        During the first quarter of 2008, the Company sold the remaining 8.4 million Legg shares at a pretax loss of $10.3 million ($6.7 million after-tax).

Selected portfolios of securities purchased under agreements to resell, securities borrowed, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, securities loaned and certain non-collateralized short-term borrowings

        The Company elected the fair-value option retrospectively for our United States and United Kingdom portfolios of fixed-income securities purchased under agreements to resell and fixed-income securities sold under agreements to repurchase (and certain non-collateralized short-term borrowings). The fair-value option was also elected prospectively in the second quarter of 2007 for certain portfolios of fixed-income securities lending and borrowing transactions based in Japan. In each case, the election was made because the related interest-rate risk is managed on a portfolio basis, primarily with derivative instruments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings. Previously, these positions were accounted for on an accrual basis.

        Changes in fair value for transactions in these portfolios are recorded inPrincipal transactions. The related interest revenue and interest expense are measured based on the contractual rates specified in the transactions and are reported as interest revenue and expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

Selected letters of credit and revolving loans hedged by credit default swaps or participation notes

        The Company has elected the fair-value option for certain letters of credit that are hedged with derivative instruments or participation notes. Upon electing the fair-value option, the related portions of the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for unfunded lending commitments were reversed. Citigroup elected the fair-value option for these transactions because the risk is managed on a fair-value basis and to mitigate accounting mismatches.

        The notional amount of these unfunded letters of credit was $2$1.8 billion as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and $1.4 billion as of December 31, 2008. The amount funded was insignificant with no amounts 90 days or more past due or on a non-accrual status at JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.

        These items have been classified inTrading account assets orTrading account liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Changes in fair value of these items are classified inPrincipal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.

Certain credit products

        Citigroup has elected the fair-value option for certain originated and purchased loans, including certain unfunded loan products, such as guarantees and letters of credit, executed by Citigroup's trading businesses. None of these credit products is a highly leveraged financing commitment. Significant groups of transactions include loans and unfunded loan products that are expected to be either sold or securitized in the near term, or transactions where the economic risks are hedged with derivative instruments such as purchased credit default swaps or total return swaps where the Company pays the total return on the underlying loans to a third party. Citigroup has elected the fair-value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications. Fair value was not elected for most lending transactions across the Company, including where those management objectives would not be met.


Table of Contents

        The following table provides information about certain credit products carried at fair value:

 
 June 30, 2009 December 31, 2008 
In millions of dollars Trading
assets
 Loans Trading
assets
 Loans 
Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet $15,101 $1,373 $16,254 $2,315 
Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value $2,967 $(12)$6,501 $3 
Balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $692 $1,097 $77 $1,113 
Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $480 $(1)$190 $(4)
          

 
 September 30, 2009 December 31, 2008(1) 
In millions of dollars Trading
assets
 Loans Trading
assets
 Loans 

Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet

 $16,695 $997 $16,254 $2,315 

Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value

 $1,016 $(38)$6,501 $3 

Balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due

 $794 $ $77 $ 

Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due

 $461 $ $190 $ 
          

(1)
Reclassified to conform to current period's presentation.

        In addition to the amounts reported above, $200 million and $72 million of unfunded loan commitments related to certain credit products selected for fair-value accounting were outstanding as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.

        Changes in fair value of funded and unfunded credit products are classified inPrincipal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income. Related interest revenue is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported asInterest revenue on trading account assets or loans depending on their balance sheet classifications. The changes in fair value for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008 due to instrument-specific credit risk totaled to a loss of $48$32 million and $25$32 million, respectively.

Certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity method investments

        Citigroup invests in private equity and real estate ventures for the purpose of earning investment returns and for capital appreciation. The Company has elected the fair-value option for certain of these ventures, because such investments are considered similar to many private equity or hedge fund activities in our investment companies, which are reported at fair value. The fair-value option brings consistency in the accounting and evaluation of certain of these investments. As required by SFAS 159 (ASC 825-10), allAll investments (debt and equity) in such private equity and real estate entities are accounted for at fair value. These investments are classified asInvestments on Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet.

        Citigroup also holds various non-strategic investments in leveraged buyout funds and other hedge funds that previously were required to be accounted for under the equity method. The Company elected fair-value accounting to reduce operational and accounting complexity. Since the funds account for all of their underlying assets at fair value, the impact of applying the equity method to Citigroup's investment in these funds was equivalent to fair-value accounting. Thus, this fair-value election had no impact on openingRetained earnings. These investments are classified asOther assets on Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet.

        Changes in the fair values of these investments are classified inOther revenue in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.

Certain structured liabilities

        The Company has elected the fair-value option for certain structured liabilities whose performance is linked to structured interest rates, inflation or currency risks ("structured liabilities"). The Company elected the fair-value option, because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and, therefore, are managed on a fair-value basis. These positions will continue to be classified as debt, deposits or derivatives (Trading account liabilities) on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet according to their legal form.

        For those structured liabilities classified asLong-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected, the aggregate fair value exceeds the aggregate unpaid principal balance of such instruments by $13 million as of June 30, 2009 and the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeded the aggregate fair value by $277$208 million and $671 million as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.2008, respectively.

        The change in fair value for these structured liabilities is reported inPrincipal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.

        Related interest expense is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the Consolidated Income Statement.

Certain non-structured liabilities

        The Company has elected the fair-value option for certain non-structured liabilities with fixed and floating interest rates ("non-structured liabilities"). The Company has elected the fair-value option where the interest-rate risk of such liabilities is economically hedged with derivative contracts or the proceeds are used to purchase financial assets that will also be accounted for at fair value through earnings. The election has been made to mitigate accounting mismatches and to achieve operational simplifications. These positions are reported inShort-term borrowings andLong-term debt on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet.

        For those non-structured liabilities classified asShort-term borrowings for which the fair-value option has been elected, the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceedsexceeded the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $0.4$41 million and $220 million as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and the aggregate fair value exceeded the aggregate unpaid principal balance by $5 million as December 31, 2008.2008, respectively.

        For non-structured liabilities classified asLong-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected, the aggregate fair value exceeded the aggregate unpaid principal balance of such instruments by $449 million and the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeded the aggregate fair value by $97$637 million and $856 million as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The change in fair value for these non-structured liabilities is reported inPrincipal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.

        Related interest expense continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the Consolidated Income Statement.


Table of Contents

Certain mortgage loans

        Citigroup has elected the fair-value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans held-for-sale. These loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments. The Company has elected the fair-value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications. The fair-value option was not elected for loans held-for-investment, as those loans are not hedged with derivative instruments. This election was effective for applicable instruments originated or purchased on or after September 1, 2007.

        The following table provides information about certain mortgage loans carried at fair value:

In millions of dollars June 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 
Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet $8,115 $4,273 
Aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principal balance $84 $138 
Balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $7 $9 
Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $4 $2 
      

In millions of dollars September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet

 $2,857 $4,273 

Aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principal balance

 $87 $138 

Balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due

 $8 $9 

Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due

 $6 $2 
      

        The changes in fair values of these mortgage loans is reported inOther revenue in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income. The changes in fair value during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and JuneSeptember 30, 2008 due to instrument-specific credit risk resulted in a $10$6 million loss and $24$6 million loss, respectively. Related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

Items selected for fair-value accounting in accordance with SFAS 155 (ASC 815-15-25) and SFAS 156 (ASC 860-50-35)

Certain hybrid financial instruments

        The Company has elected to apply fair-value accounting under SFAS 155 (ASC 815-15-25) for certain hybrid financial assets and liabilities whose performance is linked to risks other than interest rate, foreign exchange or inflation (e.g., equity, credit or commodity risks). In addition, the Company has elected fair-value accounting under SFAS 155 (ASC 815-15-25) for residual interests retained from securitizing certain financial assets.

        The Company has elected fair-value accounting for these instruments because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and, therefore, are managed on a fair-value basis. In addition, the accounting for these instruments is simplified under a fair-value approach as it eliminates the complicated operational requirements of bifurcating the embedded derivatives from the host contracts and accounting for each separately. The hybrid financial instruments are classified asTrading account assets, Loans,Deposits,Trading account liabilities (for prepaid derivatives),Short-term borrowings orLong-Term Debt on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet according to their legal form, while residual interests in certain securitizations are classified asTrading account assets.

        For hybrid financial instruments for which fair-value accounting has been elected under SFAS 155 (ASC 815-15-25) and that are classified asLong-term debt, the aggregate unpaid principal exceedsexceeded the aggregate fair value by $395 million$2.4 billion and $1.9$4.1 billion as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The difference for those instruments classified asLoans is immaterial.

        Changes in fair value for hybrid financial instruments, which in most cases includes a component for accrued interest, are recorded inPrincipal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income. Interest accruals for certain hybrid instruments classified as trading assets are recorded separately from the change in fair value asInterest revenue in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.


Table of Contents

Mortgage servicing rights

        The Company accounts for mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) at fair value in accordance with SFAS 156 (ASC 860-50-35).value. Fair value for MSRs is determined using an option-adjusted spread valuation approach. This approach consists of projecting servicing cash flows under multiple interest-rate scenarios and discounting these cash flows using risk-adjusted rates. The model assumptions used in the valuation of MSRs include mortgage prepayment speeds and discount rates. The fair value of MSRs is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates. In managing this risk, the Company hedges a significant portion of the values of its MSRs through the use of interest-rate derivative contracts, forward-purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities, and purchased securities classified as trading. See Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussions regarding the accounting and reporting of MSRs.

        These MSRs, which totaled $6.8$6.2 billion and $5.7 billion as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, are classified as Mortgage servicing rights on Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet. Changes in fair value of MSRs are recorded inCommissions and fees in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.


Table of Contents


19.    FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (SFAS 107/ASC 825-10-50)

Estimated Fair Value of Financial Instruments

        The table below presents the carrying value and fair value of Citigroup's financial instruments. The disclosure excludes leases, affiliate investments, pension and benefit obligations and insurance policy claim reserves. In addition, contract-holder fund amounts exclude certain insurance contracts. Also as required, the disclosure excludes the effect of taxes, any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the entire holdings of a particular instrument, excess fair value associated with deposits with no fixed maturity and other expenses that would be incurred in a market transaction. In addition, the table excludes the values of non-financial assets and liabilities, as well as a wide range of franchise, relationship and intangible values (but includes mortgage servicing rights), which are integral to a full assessment of Citigroup's financial position and the value of its net assets.

        The fair value represents management's best estimates based on a range of methodologies and assumptions. The carrying value of short-term financial instruments not accounted for at fair value, under SFAS 155(ASC 815-15-25) or SFAS 159(ASC 825-10), as well as receivables and payables arising in the ordinary course of business, approximates fair value because of the relatively short period of time between their origination and expected realization. Quoted market prices are used when available for investments and for both trading and end-user derivatives, as well as for liabilities, such as long-term debt, with quoted prices. For performing loans not accounted for at fair value, under SFAS 155(ASC 815-15-25) or SFAS 159(ASC 825-10), contractual cash flows are discounted at quoted secondary market rates or estimated market rates if available. Otherwise, sales of comparable loan portfolios or current market origination rates for loans with similar terms and risk characteristics are used. For loans with doubt as to collectibility,collectability, expected cash flows are discounted using an appropriate rate considering the time of collection and the premium for the uncertainty of the flows. This method of estimating fair value does not incorporate the exit-price concept of fair value prescribed by ASC 820-10 (SFAS No. 157). The value of collateral is also considered. For liabilities such as long-term debt not accounted for at fair value under SFAS 155(ASC 815-15-25) or SFAS 159(ASC 825-10) and without quoted market prices, market borrowing rates of interest are used to discount contractual cash flows.

 
 June 30, 2009 December 31, 2008 
In billions of dollars Carrying
value
 Estimated
fair value
 Carrying
value
 Estimated
fair value
 

Assets

             

Investments

 $266.8 $261.6 $256.0 $251.9 

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

  179.5  179.5  184.1  184.1 

Trading account assets

  325.0  325.0  377.6  377.6 

Loans(1)

  602.6  601.3  660.9  642.7 

Other financial assets(2)

  314.4  314.4  316.6  316.6 
          

 
 September 30, 2009 December 31, 2008 
In billions of dollars Carrying
value
 Estimated
fair value
 Carrying
value
 Estimated
fair value
 

Assets

             

Investments

 $261.9 $261.7 $256.0 $251.9 

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

  197.4  197.4  184.1  184.1 

Trading account assets

  340.7  340.7  377.6  377.6 

Loans(1)

  582.7  573.6  660.9  642.7 

Other financial assets(2)

  344.9  344.7  316.6  316.6 
          

 

 
 June 30, 2009 December 31, 2008 
In billions of dollars Carrying
value
 Estimated
fair value
 Carrying
value
 Estimated
fair value
 

Liabilities

             

Deposits

 $804.7 $803.5 $774.2 $772.9 

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

  172.0  172.0  205.3  205.3 

Trading account liabilities

  119.3  119.3  167.5  167.5 

Long-term debt

  348.0  315.5  359.6  317.1 

Other financial liabilities(3)

  203.7  203.7  253.9  253.9 
          

 
 September 30, 2009 December 31, 2008 
In billions of dollars Carrying
value
 Estimated
fair value
 Carrying
value
 Estimated
fair value
 

Liabilities

             

Deposits

 $832.6 $832.3 $774.2 $772.9 

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

  178.2  178.2  205.3  205.3 

Trading account liabilities

  130.5  130.5  165.8  165.8 

Long-term debt

  379.6  374.9  359.6  317.1 

Other financial liabilities(3)

  171.7  171.7  255.6  255.6 
          

(1)
The carrying value of loans is net of theAllowance for loan losses of $35.9$36.4 billion for JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and $29.6 billion for December 31, 2008. In addition, the carrying values exclude $3.2$3.1 billion and $3.7 billion of lease finance receivables at JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.

(2)
Includes cash and due from banks, deposits with banks, brokerage receivables, reinsurance recoverable, mortgage servicing rights, and other financial instruments included inOther assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, for all of which the carrying value is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

(3)
Includes brokerage payables, short-term borrowings and other financial instruments included in Other Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, for all of which the carrying value is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

        Fair values vary from period to period based on changes in a wide range of factors, including interest rates, credit quality, and market perceptions of value and as existing assets and liabilities run off and new transactions are entered into.

        The estimated fair values of loans reflect changes in credit status since the loans were made, changes in interest rates in the case of fixed-rate loans, and premium values at origination of certain loans. The carrying values (reduced by theAllowance for loan losses) exceeded the estimated fair values of Citigroup's loans, in aggregate, by $1.3$9.1 billion and $18.2 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. At JuneSeptember 30, 2009, the carrying values, net of the allowanceallowances, exceeded estimated fair value for consumer loans by $2.1 billion, and the estimated fair values exceeded the carrying values net of allowances by $0.8$7 billion and $2 billion for consumer loans and corporate loans.loans, respectively.

        Citigroup has determined that it is not practicable to estimate the fair value on an ongoing basis of the loss sharing program with the United States Government because the program is a unique contract tailored to fit the specific portfolio of assets held by Citigroup, contains various public policy and other non-financial elements, and provides a significant Tier 1 Capital benefit.


Table of Contents


20.    GUARANTEES

        The Company provides a variety of guarantees and indemnifications to Citigroup customers to enhance their credit standing and enable them to complete a wide variety of business transactions. FASB Interpretation No. 45, "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others" (FIN 45/ASC 460-10), provides initial measurement and disclosure guidance in accounting for guarantees. FIN 45(ASC 460-10) requires that, forFor certain contracts meeting the definition of a guarantee, the guarantor must recognize, at inception, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee.

        In addition, the guarantor must disclose the maximum potential amount of future payments the guarantor could be required to make under the guarantee, if there were a total default by the guaranteed parties. The determination of the maximum potential future payments is based on the notional amount of the guarantees without consideration of possible recoveries under recourse provisions or from collateral held or pledged. Such amounts bear no relationship to the anticipated losses, if any, on these guarantees.

        The following tables present information about the Company's guarantees at JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:

 
 Maximum potential amount of future payments  
 
In billions of dollars at June 30,
except carrying value in millions
 Expire within
1 year
 Expire after
1 year
 Total amount
outstanding
 Carrying value
(in millions)
 

2009

             

Financial standby letters of credit

 $52.2 $50.6 $102.8 $297.9 

Performance guarantees

  9.7  5.6  15.3  31.2 

Derivative instruments considered to be guarantees

  9.1  3.1  12.2  1,393.4 

Loans sold with recourse

    0.3  0.3  55.2 

Securities lending indemnifications(1)

  55.3    55.3   

Credit card merchant processing(1)

  54.2    54.2   

Custody indemnifications and other

    25.2  25.2  152.8 
          

Total

 $180.5 $84.8 $265.3 $1,930.5 
          

 
 Maximum potential amount of future payments  
 
In billions of dollars at September 30,
except carrying value in millions
 Expire within
1 year
 Expire after
1 year
 Total amount
outstanding
 Carrying value
(in millions)
 

2009

             

Financial standby letters of credit

 $48.8 $48.2 $97.0 $465.7 

Performance guarantees

  9.1  5.4  14.5  32.5 

Derivative instruments considered to be guarantees

  6.8  9.6  16.4  855.2 

Loans sold with recourse

    0.3  0.3  65.6 

Securities lending indemnifications(1)

  66.1    66.1   

Credit card merchant processing(1)

  59.4    59.4   

Custody indemnifications and other

    27.5  27.5  154.6 
          

Total

 $190.2 $91.0 $281.2 $1,573.6 
          

 

 
 Maximum potential amount of future payments  
 
In billions of dollars at December 31,
except carrying value in millions
 Expire within
1 year
 Expire after
1 year
 Total amount
outstanding
 Carrying value
(in millions)
 

2008

             

Financial standby letters of credit

 $31.6 $62.6 $94.2 $289.0 

Performance guarantees

  9.4  6.9  16.3  23.6 

Derivative instruments considered to be guarantees(2)

  7.6  7.2  14.8  1,308.4 

Guarantees of collection of contractual cash flows(1)

    0.3  0.3   

Loans sold with recourse

    0.3  0.3  56.4 

Securities lending indemnifications(1)

  47.6    47.6   

Credit card merchant processing(1)

  56.7    56.7   

Custody indemnifications and other

    21.6  21.6  149.2 
          

Total

 $152.9 $98.9 $251.8 $1,826.6 
          

(1)
The carrying values of guarantees of collections of contractual cash flows, securities lending indemnifications and credit card merchant processing are not material, as the Company has determined that the amount and probability of potential liabilities arising from these guarantees are not significant.

(2)
Reclassified to conform to current period presentation.

Financial Standby Letters of Credit

        Citigroup issues standby letters of credit which substitute its own credit for that of the borrower. If a letter of credit is drawn down, the borrower is obligated to repay Citigroup. Standby letters of credit protect a third party from defaults on contractual obligations. Financial standby letters of credit include guarantees of payment of insurance premiums and reinsurance risks that support industrial revenue bond underwriting and settlement of payment obligations to clearing houses, and also support options and purchases of securities or are in lieu of escrow deposit accounts. Financial standbys also backstop loans, credit facilities, promissory notes and trade acceptances.

Performance Guarantees

        Performance guarantees and letters of credit are issued to guarantee a customer's tender bid on a construction or systems-installation project or to guarantee completion of such projects in accordance with contract terms. They are also issued to support a customer's obligation to supply specified products, commodities, or maintenance or warranty services to a third party.

Derivative Instruments Considered to Be Guarantees

        Derivatives are financial instruments whose cash flows are based on a notional amount or an underlying instrument, where there is little or no initial investment, and whose terms require or permit net settlement. Derivatives may be used for a variety of reasons, including risk management, or to enhance returns. Financial institutions often act as intermediaries for their clients, helping clients reduce their risks. However, derivatives may also be used to take a risk position.

        The derivative instruments considered guarantees, which are presented in the table above, include only those instruments that require Citi to make payments to the


Table of Contents

counterparty based on changes in an underlying that is related to an asset, a liability, or an equity security held by the guaranteed party. More specifically, derivative instruments considered guarantees include certain over-the-counter written put options where the counterparty is not a bank, hedge fund or broker-dealer (such counterparties are considered to be


Table of Contents

dealers in these markets, and may therefore not hold the underlying instruments). However, credit derivatives sold by the Company are excluded from this presentation. In addition, non-credit derivative contracts that are cash settled and for which the Company is unable to assert that it is probable the counterparty held the underlying instrument at the inception of the contract also are excluded from the disclosure above. The Company's credit derivative portfolio as protection seller (guarantor) is presented in Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Derivative Activities."

        In instances where the Company's maximum potential future payment is unlimited, the notional amount of the contract is disclosed.

Guarantees of Collection of Contractual Cash Flows

        Guarantees of collection of contractual cash flows protect investors in credit card receivables securitization trusts from loss of interest relating to insufficient collections on the underlying receivables in the trusts. The notional amount of these guarantees as of December 31, 2008, was $300 million. No such guarantees were outstanding at JuneSeptember 30, 2009.

Loans Sold with Recourse

        Loans sold with recourse represent the Company's obligations to reimburse the buyers for loan losses under certain circumstances. Recourse refers to the clause in a sales agreement under which a lender will fully reimburse the buyer/investor for any losses resulting from the purchased loans. This may be accomplished by the seller's taking back any loans that become delinquent.

Securities Lending Indemnifications

        Owners of securities frequently lend those securities for a fee to other parties who may sell them short or deliver them to another party to satisfy some other obligation. Banks may administer such securities lending programs for their clients. Securities lending indemnifications are issued by the bank to guarantee that a securities lending customer will be made whole in the event that the security borrower does not return the security subject to the lending agreement and collateral held is insufficient to cover the market value of the security.

Credit Card Merchant Processing

        Credit card merchant processing guarantees represent the Company's indirect obligations in connection with the processing of private label and bankcard transactions on behalf of merchants.

        Citigroup's primary credit card business is the issuance of credit cards to individuals. In addition, the Company provides transaction processing services to various merchants with respect to bankcard and private-label cards. In the event of a billing dispute with respect to a bankcard transaction between a merchant and a cardholder that is ultimately resolved in the cardholder's favor, the third party holds the primary contingent liability to credit or refund the amount to the cardholder and charge back the transaction to the merchant. If the third party is unable to collect this amount from the merchant, it bears the loss for the amount of the credit or refund paid to the cardholder.

        The Company continues to have the primary contingent liability with respect to its portfolio of private-label merchants. The risk of loss is mitigated as the cash flows between the third party or the Company and the merchant are settled on a net basis and the third party or the Company has the right to offset any payments with cash flows otherwise due to the merchant. To further mitigate this risk, the third party or the Company may require a merchant to make an escrow deposit, delay settlement, or include event triggers to provide the third party or the Company with more financial and operational control in the event of the financial deterioration of the merchant, or require various credit enhancements (including letters of credit and bank guarantees). In the unlikely event that a private label merchant is unable to deliver products, services or a refund to its private label cardholders, Citigroup is contingently liable to credit or refund cardholders. In addition, although a third party holds the primary contingent liability with respect to the processing of bankcard transactions, in the event that the third party does not have sufficient collateral from the merchant or sufficient financial resources of its own to provide the credit or refunds to the cardholders, Citigroup would be liable to credit or refund the cardholders.

        The Company's maximum potential contingent liability related to both bankcard and private label merchant processing services is estimated to be the total volume of credit card transactions that meet the requirements to be valid chargeback transactions at any given time. At JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, this maximum potential exposure was estimated to be $54$59 billion and $57 billion, respectively.

        However, the Company believes that the maximum exposure is not representative of the actual potential loss exposure based on the Company's historical experience and its position as a secondary guarantor (in the case of bankcards). In most cases, this contingent liability is unlikely to arise, as most products and services are delivered when purchased and amounts are refunded when items are returned to merchants. The Company assesses the probability and amount of its contingent liability related to merchant processing based on the financial strength of the primary guarantor (in the case of bankcards) and the extent and nature of unresolved chargebacks and its historical loss experience. At JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the estimated losses incurred and the carrying amounts of the Company's contingent obligations related to merchant processing activities were immaterial.

Custody Indemnifications

        Custody indemnifications are issued to guarantee that custody clients will be made whole in the event that a third-party subcustodian or depository institution fails to safeguard clients' assets.


Table of Contents

Other

        As of December 31, 2008, Citigroup carried a reserve of $149 million related to certain of Visa USA's litigation matters. As


Table of JuneContents

of September 30, 2009, the carrying value of the reserve was $153$155 million. This reserve is included inOther liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Other Guarantees and Indemnifications

        The Company, through its credit card business, provides various cardholder protection programs on several of its card products, including programs that provide insurance coverage for rental cars, coverage for certain losses associated with purchased products, price protection for certain purchases and protection for lost luggage. These guarantees are not included in the table, since the total outstanding amount of the guarantees and the Company's maximum exposure to loss cannot be quantified. The protection is limited to certain types of purchases and certain types of losses and it is not possible to quantify the purchases that would qualify for these benefits at any given time. The Company assesses the probability and amount of its potential liability related to these programs based on the extent and nature of its historical loss experience. At JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the actual and estimated losses incurred and the carrying value of the Company's obligations related to these programs were immaterial.

        In the normal course of business, the Company provides standard representations and warranties to counterparties in contracts in connection with numerous transactions and also provides indemnifications that protect the counterparties to the contracts in the event that additional taxes are owed due either to a change in the tax law or an adverse interpretation of the tax law. Counterparties to these transactions provide the Company with comparable indemnifications. While such representations, warranties and tax indemnifications are essential components of many contractual relationships, they do not represent the underlying business purpose for the transactions. The indemnification clauses are often standard contractual terms related to the Company's own performance under the terms of a contract and are entered into in the normal course of business based on an assessment that the risk of loss is remote. Often these clauses are intended to ensure that terms of a contract are met at inception (for example, that loans transferred to a counterparty in a sales transaction did in fact meet the conditions specified in the contract at the transfer date). No compensation is received for these standard representations and warranties, and it is not possible to determine their fair value because they rarely, if ever, result in a payment. In many cases, there are no stated or notional amounts included in the indemnification clauses and the contingencies potentially triggering the obligation to indemnify have not occurred and are not expected to occur. There are no amounts reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, related to these indemnifications and they are not included in the table.

        In addition, the Company is a member of or shareholder in hundreds of value-transfer networks (VTNs) (payment clearing and settlement systems as well as securities exchanges) around the world. As a condition of membership, many of these VTNs require that members stand ready to backstop the net effect on the VTNs of a member's default on its obligations. The Company's potential obligations as a shareholder or member of VTN associations are excluded from the scope of FIN 45(ASC 460-10-15-7),not considered to be guarantees, since the shareholders and members represent subordinated classes of investors in the VTNs. Accordingly, the Company's participation in VTNs is not reported in the table and there are no amounts reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 or December 31, 2008 for potential obligations that could arise from the Company's involvement with VTN associations.

        At JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the total carrying amounts of the liabilities related to the guarantees and indemnifications included in the table amounted to approximately $1.9$1.6 billion and $1.8 billion, respectively. The carrying value of derivative instruments is included in eitherTrading liabilities orOther liabilities, depending upon whether the derivative was entered into for trading or non-trading purposes. The carrying value of financial and performance guarantees is included inOther liabilities. For loans sold with recourse, the carrying value of the liability is included inOther liabilities. In addition, at JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,Other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet include an allowance for credit losses of $1,082$1,074 million and $887 million relating to letters of credit and unfunded lending commitments, respectively.

Collateral

        Cash collateral available to the Company to reimburse losses realized under these guarantees and indemnifications amounted to $36 billion at September 30, 2009 and $33 billion at June 30, 2009 as well as December 31, 2008. Securities and other marketable assets held as collateral amounted to $31$39 billion and $27 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, the majority of which collateral is held to reimburse losses realized under securities lending indemnifications. Additionally, letters of credit in favor of the Company held as collateral amounted to $700$900 million and $503 million at JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. Other property may also be available to the Company to cover losses under certain guarantees and indemnifications; however, the value of such property has not been determined.


Table of Contents

Performance Risk

        Citigroup evaluates the performance risk of its guarantees based on the assigned referenced counterparty internal or external ratings. Where external ratings are used, investment-grade ratings are considered to be Baa/BBB and above, while anything below is considered non-investment grade. The Citigroup internal ratings are in line with the related external rating system. On certain underlying referenced credits or entities, ratings are not available. Such referenced credits are included in the "Not-rated" category. The maximum potential amount of the future payments related to guarantees and credit derivatives sold is determined to be the notional amount of


Table of Contents

these contracts, which is the par amount of the assets guaranteed.

        Presented in the tables below is the maximum potential amount of future payments classified based upon internal and external credit ratings as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. As previously mentioned, the determination of the maximum potential future payments is based on the notional amount of the guarantees without consideration of possible recoveries under recourse provisions or from collateral held or pledged. Such amounts bear no relationship to the anticipated losses, if any, on these guarantees.

 
 Maximum potential amount of future payments 
In billions of dollars as of June 30, 2009 Investment
grade
 Non-investment
grade
 Not rated Total 

Financial standby letters of credit

 $45.9 $18.6 $38.3 $102.8 

Performance guarantees

  7.8  2.9  4.6  15.3 

Derivative instruments deemed to be guarantees

      12.2  12.2 

Loans sold with recourse

      0.3  0.3 

Securities lending indemnifications

      55.3  55.3 

Credit card merchant processing

      54.2  54.2 

Custody indemnifications and other

  20.8  4.4    25.2 
          

Total

 $74.5 $25.9 $164.9 $265.3 
          

 
 Maximum potential amount of future payments 
In billions of dollars as of September 30, 2009 Investment
grade
 Non-investment
grade
 Not rated Total 

Financial standby letters of credit

 $48.5 $21.1 $27.4 $97.0 

Performance guarantees

  7.0  3.7  3.8  14.5 

Derivative instruments deemed to be guarantees

      16.4  16.4 

Loans sold with recourse

      0.3  0.3 

Securities lending indemnifications

      66.1  66.1 

Credit card merchant processing

      59.4  59.4 

Custody indemnifications and other

  22.3  5.2    27.5 
          

Total

 $77.8 $30.0 $173.4 $281.2 
          

 

 
 Maximum potential amount of future payments 
In billions of dollars as of December 31, 2008 Investment
grade
 Non-investment
grade
 Not rated Total 

Financial standby letters of credit

 $49.2 $28.6 $16.4 $94.2 

Performance guarantees

  5.7  5.0  5.6  16.3 

Derivative instruments deemed to be guarantees

      14.8  14.8 

Guarantees of collection of contractual cash flows

      0.3  0.3 

Loans sold with recourse

      0.3  0.3 

Securities lending indemnifications

      47.6  47.6 

Credit card merchant processing

      56.7  56.7 

Custody indemnifications and other

  18.5  3.1    21.6 
          

Total

 $73.4 $36.7 $141.7 $251.8 
          

Table of Contents

Credit Commitments

        The table below summarizes Citigroup's other commitments as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.

In millions of dollars U.S. Outside of
U.S.
 June 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

Commercial and similar letters of credit

 $1,833 $5,975 $7,808 $8,215 

One- to four-family residential mortgages

  1,083  247  1,330  937 

Revolving open-end loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties

  23,513  2,850  26,363  25,212 

Commercial real estate, construction and land development

  1,326  570  1,896  2,702 

Credit card lines

  738,176  134,867  873,043  1,002,437 

Commercial and other consumer loan commitments

  182,209  85,005  267,214  309,997 
          

Total

 $948,140 $229,514 $1,177,654 $1,349,500 
          

In millions of dollars U.S. Outside of
U.S.
 September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

Commercial and similar letters of credit

 $1,691 $5,625 $7,316 $8,215 

One- to four-family residential mortgages

  1,002  260  1,262  937 

Revolving open-end loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties

  22,186  2,919  25,105  25,212 

Commercial real estate, construction and land development

  1,059  604  1,663  2,702 

Credit card lines

  680,750  134,402  815,152  1,002,437 

Commercial and other consumer loan commitments

  172,708  89,451  262,159  309,997 
          

Total

 $879,396 $233,261 $1,112,657 $1,349,500 
          

        The majority of unused commitments are contingent upon customers' maintaining specific credit standards. Commercial commitments generally have floating interest rates and fixed expiration dates and may require payment of fees. Such fees (net of certain direct costs) are deferred and, upon exercise of the commitment, amortized over the life of the loan or, if exercise is deemed remote, amortized over the commitment period.

Commercial and similar letters of credit

        A commercial letter of credit is an instrument by which Citigroup substitutes its credit for that of a customer to enable the customers to finance the purchase of goods or to incur other commitments. Citigroup issues a letter on behalf of its client to a supplier and agrees to pay them upon presentation of documentary evidence that the supplier has performed in accordance with the terms of the letter of credit. When drawn, the customer then is required to reimburse Citigroup.

One- to four-family residential mortgages

        A one- to four-family residential mortgage commitment is a written confirmation from Citigroup to a seller of a property that the bank will advance the specified sums enabling the buyer to complete the purchase.

Revolving open-end loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties

        Revolving open-end loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties are essentially home equity lines of credit. A home equity line of credit is a loan secured by a primary residence or second home to the extent of the excess of fair market value over the debt outstanding for the first mortgage.

Commercial Real Estate, Construction and Land Development

        Commercial real estate, construction and land development include unused portions of commitments to extend credit for the purpose of financing commercial and multifamily residential properties as well as land development projects. Both secured-by-real estate and unsecured commitments are included in this line. In addition, undistributed loan proceeds where there is an obligation to advance for construction progress, are also included in this line. However, this line only includes those extensions of credit that once funded will be classified as Loans on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Credit card lines

        Citigroup provides credit to customers by issuing credit cards. The credit card lines are unconditionally cancellable by the issuer.

Commercial and other consumer loan commitments

        Commercial and other consumer loan commitments include commercial commitments to make or purchase loans, to purchase third-party receivables and to provide note issuance or revolving underwriting facilities. Amounts include $122$130 billion and $140 billion with an original maturity of less than one year at JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. In addition, included in this line item are highly leveraged financing commitments which are agreements that provide funding to a borrower with higher levels of debt (measured by the ratio of debt capital to equity capital of the borrower) than is generally considered normal for other companies. This type of financing is commonly employed in corporate acquisitions, management buy-outs and similar transactions.


Table of Contents


21.    CONTINGENCIES

        The Company is a defendant in numerous lawsuits and other legal proceedings arising out of alleged misconduct in connection with certain matters. In view of the large number of such matters, the uncertainties of the timing and outcome of this type of litigation, the novel issues presented, and the significant amounts involved, it is possible that the ultimate costs of these matters may exceed or be below the Company's litigation reserves. The Company will continue to defend itself vigorously in these cases, and seek to resolve them in the manner management believes is in the best interests of the Company.

        In addition, in the ordinary course of business, Citigroup and its subsidiaries are defendants or co-defendants or parties in various litigation and regulatory matters incidental to and typical of the businesses in which they are engaged. In the opinion of the Company's management, the ultimate resolution of these legal and regulatory proceedings would not be likely to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition of the Company but, if involving monetary liability, may be material to the Company's operating results for any particular period.


Table of Contents


22.    CITIBANK, N.A. EQUITY

Statement of Changes in Equity (Unaudited)

 
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
In millions of dollars, except shares 2009 2008 
Common stock ($20 par value)       
Balance, beginning of period—Shares: 37,534,553 in 2009 and 2008 $751 $751 
      
Balance, end of period—Shares: 37,534,553 in 2009 and 2008 $751 $751 
      
Surplus       
 Balance, beginning of period $74,767 $69,135 
 Capital contribution from parent company  27,481  55 
 Employee benefit plans  15  100 
      
Balance, end of period $102,263 $69,290 
      
Retained earnings       
Balance, beginning of period $21,735 $31,915 
Adjustment to opening balance, net of taxes(1)  402   
      
Adjusted balance, beginning of period $22,137 $31,915 
Net income (loss)  (1,477) (1,803)
Dividends paid  3  (27)
Other(2)  117   
      
Balance, end of period $20,780 $30,085 
      
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)       
Balance, beginning of period $(15,895)$(2,495)
Adjustment to opening balance, net of taxes(1)  (402)  
      
Adjusted balance, beginning of period $(16,297)$(2,495)
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities available-for-sale, net of taxes  1,731  (2,234)
Net change in FX translation adjustment, net of taxes  (164) 527 
Net change in cash flow hedges, net of taxes  737  (402)
Pension liability adjustment, net of taxes  29  65 
      
Net change in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) $2,333 $(2,044)
      
Balance, end of period $(13,964)$(4,539)
      
Total Citibank common stockholder's equity and total Citibank stockholder's equity $109,830 $95,587 
      
Noncontrolling interest       
Balance, beginning of period $1,082 $1,266 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest shareholders  23  56 
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interest shareholders  (16) (11)
Accumulated other comprehensive income—Net change in unrealized gains and losses on investments securities, net of tax  1  (12)
Accumulated other comprehensive income—Net change in FX translation adjustment, net of tax  (40) 126 
All other  (153) (10)
      
Net change in noncontrolling interest $(185)$149 
      
Balance, end of period $897 $1,415 
      
Total equity $110,727 $97,002 
      
Comprehensive income (loss)       
Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interest $(1,454)$(1,747)
Net change in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)  2,294  (1,930)
      
Total comprehensive income (loss) $840 $(3,677)
Comprehensive income attributable to the noncontrolling interest  (16) 170 
      
Comprehensive income attributable to Citibank $856 $(3,847)
      

 
 Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
In millions of dollars, except shares 2009 2008 

Common stock ($20 par value)

       

Balance, beginning of period—Shares: 37,534,553 in 2009 and 2008

 $751 $751 
      

Balance, end of period—Shares: 37,534,553 in 2009 and 2008

 $751 $751 
      

Surplus

       

Balance, beginning of period

 $74,767 $69,135 

Capital contribution from parent company

  30,492  77 

Employee benefit plans

  34  107 
      

Balance, end of period

 $105,293 $69,319 
      

Retained earnings

       

Balance, beginning of period

 $21,735 $31,915 

Adjustment to opening balance, net of taxes(1)

  402   
      

Adjusted balance, beginning of period

 $22,137 $31,915 

Net income (loss)

  (2,270) (1,450)

Dividends paid

  4  (34)

Other(2)

  117   
      

Balance, end of period

 $19,988 $30,431 
      

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

       

Balance, beginning of period

 $(15,895)$(2,495)

Adjustment to opening balance, net of taxes(1)

  (402)  
      

Adjusted balance, beginning of period

 $(16,297)$(2,495)

Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities available-for-sale, net of taxes

  3,758  (4,971)

Net change in FX translation adjustment, net of taxes

  850  (2,244)

Net change in cash flow hedges, net of taxes

  281  (214)

Pension liability adjustment, net of taxes

  (7) 90 
      

Net change in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

 $4,882 $(7,339)
      

Balance, end of period

 $(11,415)$(9,834)
      

Total Citibank common stockholder's equity and total Citibank stockholder's equity

 $114,617 $90,667 
      

Noncontrolling interest

       

Balance, beginning of period

 $1,082 $1,266 

Initial consolidation of a noncontrolling interest

  123   

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest shareholders

  46  88 

Dividends paid to noncontrolling interest shareholders

  (16) (86)

Accumulated other comprehensive income—Net change in unrealized gains and losses on investments securities, net of tax

  7  3 

Accumulated other comprehensive income—Net change in FX translation adjustment, net of tax

  15  6 

All other

  (155) (5)
      

Net change in noncontrolling interest

 $20 $6 
      

Balance, end of period

 $1,102 $1,272 
      

Total equity

 $115,719 $91,939 
      

Comprehensive income (loss)

       

Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interest

 $(2,224)$(1,362)

Net change in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

  4,904  (7,330)
      

Total comprehensive income (loss)

 $2,680 $(8,692)

Comprehensive income attributable to the noncontrolling interest

  68  97 
      

Comprehensive income attributable to Citibank

 $2,612 $(8,789)
      

(1)
The adjustment to the opening balances forRetained earnings andAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss) representrepresents the cumulative effect of initially adopting FSPASC 320-10-65-1 (FSP FAS 115-2 (ASC 320-10-65-1)115-2). See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(2)
Represents the accounting in accordance with SFAS 141,Business Combinations for the transfers of assets and liabilities between Citibank, N.AN.A. and other affiliates under the common control of Citigroup.

Table of Contents


23.    SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Public and Private Exchange Offers

        On July 23, 2009 and July 29, 2009, Citigroup closed its exchange offers with the private and public holders of preferred stock and trust preferred securities, as applicable ($32.8 billion in aggregate liquidation value). In connection with these exchanges, the U.S. Treasury also exchanged $25 billion of aggregate liquidation value of its preferred stock, for a total exchange of $57.8 billion.

Sale of Nikko Asset Management

        On July 30, 2009, Citigroup entered into a definitive agreement to sell its entire ownership interest in Nikko Asset Management to The Sumitomo Trust and Banking Co., Ltd. for an all cash consideration of approximately $795 million (¥75.6 billion). The sale is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2009, subject to regulatory approvals and customary closing conditions, and is not expected to have a material impact on Citi's net income.

        As required by SFAS 165,Subsequent Events, the Company has evaluated subsequent events through August 7,November 6, 2009, which is the date its Consolidated Financial Statements were issued.


24.    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

        These unaudited condensed consolidating financial statement schedules are presented for purposes of additional analysis but should be considered in relation to the consolidated financial statements of Citigroup taken as a whole.

Citigroup Parent Company

        The holding company, Citigroup Inc.

Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. (CGMHI)

        Citigroup guarantees various debt obligations of CGMHI as well as all of the outstanding debt obligations under CGMHI's publicly issued debt.

Citigroup Funding Inc. (CFI)

        CFI is a first-tier subsidiary of Citigroup, which issues commercial paper, medium-term notes and structured equity-linked and credit-linked notes, all of which are guaranteed by Citigroup.

CitiFinancial Credit Company (CCC)

        An indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup. CCC is a wholly owned subsidiary of Associates First Capital Corporation (described below). Citigroup has issued a full and unconditional guarantee of the outstanding indebtedness of CCC.

Associates First Capital Corporation (Associates)

        A wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup. Citigroup has issued a full and unconditional guarantee of the outstanding long-term debt securities and commercial paper of Associates. In addition, Citigroup guaranteed various debt obligations of Citigroup Finance Canada Inc. (CFCI), a wholly owned subsidiary of Associates. CFCI continues to issue debt in the Canadian market supported by a Citigroup guarantee. Associates is the immediate parent company of CCC (described above).

Other Citigroup Subsidiaries

        Includes all other subsidiaries of Citigroup, intercompany eliminations, and income/loss from discontinued operations.

Consolidating Adjustments

        Includes Citigroup parent company elimination of distributed and undistributed income of subsidiaries, investment in subsidiaries and the elimination of CCC, which is included in the Associates column.


Table of Contents

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME

 
 Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 
In millions of dollars Citigroup
parent
company
 CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
Citigroup
subsidiaries,
eliminations
 Consolidating
adjustments
 Citigroup
consolidated
 
Revenues                         
Dividends from subsidiary banks and bank holding companies $16 $ $ $ $ $ $(16)$ 
                  
Interest revenue $57 $1,930 $1 $1,573 $1,795 $15,888 $(1,573)$19,671 
Interest revenue—intercompany  554  1,461  1,030  (1,653) 113  (3,158) 1,653   
Interest expense  1,988  725  449  21  117  3,563  (21) 6,842 
Interest expense—intercompany  (294) 701  260  (1,111) 395  (1,062) 1,111   
                  
Net interest revenue $(1,083)$1,965 $322 $1,010 $1,396 $10,229 $(1,010)$12,829 
                  
Commissions and fees $ $1,829 $ $11 $29 $3,579 $(11)$5,437 
Commissions and fees—intercompany    26    16  23  (49) (16)  
Principal transactions  474  575  (1,245)   2  627    433 
Principal transactions—intercompany  (364) 772  614    (76) (946)    
Other income  1,150  11,918  115  107  199  (2,112) (107) 11,270 
Other income—intercompany  (2,022) (53) (91) 2  8  2,158  (2)  
                  
Total non-interest revenues $(762)$15,067 $(607)$136 $185 $3,257 $(136)$17,140 
                  
Total revenues, net of interest expense $(1,829)$17,032 $(285)$1,146 $1,581 $13,486 $(1,162)$29,969 
                  
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims $ $14 $ $982 $1,118 $11,544 $(982)$12,676 
                  
Expenses                         
Compensation and benefits $5 $1,816 $ $139 $187 $4,351 $(139)$6,359 
Compensation and benefits—intercompany  1  142    71  34  (177) (71)  
Other expense  180  669    80  115  4,676  (80) 5,640 
Other expense—intercompany  (12) 334  2  107  152  (476) (107)  
                  
Total operating expenses $174 $2,961 $2 $397 $488 $8,374 $(397)$11,999 
                  
Income (Loss) before taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries $(2,003)$14,057 $(287)$(233)$(25)$(6,432)$217 $5,294 
Income taxes (benefits)  (1,696) 5,472  (117) (89) (17) (2,735) 89  907 
Equities in undistributed income of subsidiaries  4,586            (4,586)  
                  
Income (Loss) from continuing operations $4,279 $8,585 $(170)$(144)$(8)$(3,697)$(4,458)$4,387 
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes            (142)   (142)
                  
Net income (Loss) before attribution of Noncontrolling Interests $4,279 $8,585 $(170)$(144)$(8)$(3,839)$(4,458)$4,245 
                  
Net Income (Loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests    (50)       16    (34)
                  
Citigroup's Net Income (Loss) $4,279 $8,635 $(170)$(144)$(8)$(3,855)$(4,458)$4,279 
                  

 
 Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 
In millions of dollars Citigroup
parent
company
 CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
Citigroup
subsidiaries,
eliminations
 Consolidating
adjustments
 Citigroup
consolidated
 

Revenues

                         

Dividends from subsidiary banks and bank holding companies

 $1,005 $ $ $ $ $ $(1,005)$ 
                  

Interest revenue

 $57  1,682 $ $1,526 $1,759 $15,180 $(1,526)$18,678 

Interest revenue—intercompany

  477  (90) 1,053  1,689  96  (1,536) (1,689)  

Interest expense

  2,495  644  400  17  84  3,057  (17) 6,680 

Interest expense—intercompany

  (137) (165) 260  2,212  377  (335) (2,212)  
                  

Net interest revenue

 $(1,824)$1,113 $393 $986 $1,394 $10,922 $(986)$11,998 
                  

Commissions and fees

 $ $1,229 $ $16 $36 $1,953 $(16)$3,218 

Commissions and fees—intercompany

    188    51  63  (251) (51)  

Principal transactions

  317  2,431  (610)   2  (480)   1,660 

Principal transactions—intercompany

  (493) (1,380) 192    (13) 1,694     

Other income

  (1,158) 676  (100) 112  142  3,954  (112) 3,514 

Other income—intercompany

  2,485  23  77    5  (2,590)    
                  

Total non-interest revenues

 $1,151 $3,167 $(441)$179 $235 $4,280 $(179)$8,392 
                  

Total revenues, net of interest expense

 $332 $4,280 $(48)$1,165 $1,629 $15,202 $(2,170)$20,390 
                  

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 $ $58 $ $770 $875 $8,162 $(770)$9,095 
                  

Expenses

                         

Compensation and benefits

 $(44)$1,471 $ $134 $179 $4,530 $(134)$6,136 

Compensation and benefits— intercompany

  2  68    35  35  (105) (35)  

Other expense

  192  683  1  169  209  4,603  (169) 5,688 

Other expense—intercompany

  163  198  2  143  160  (523) (143)  
                  

Total operating expenses

 $313 $2,420 $3 $481 $583 $8,505 $(481)$11,824 
                  

Income (Loss) before taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries

 $19 $1,802 $(51)$(86)$171 $(1,465)$(919)$(529)

Income taxes (benefits)

  (392) 608  (18) (53) 37  (1,357) 53  (1,122)

Equities in undistributed income of subsidiaries

  (310)           310   
                  

Income (Loss) from continuing operations

 $101 $1,194 $(33)$(33)$134 $(108)$(662)$593 

Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes

            (418)   (418)
                  

Net income (Loss) before attribution of Noncontrolling Interests

 $101 $1,194 $(33)$(33)$134 $(526)$(662)$175 
                  

Net Income (Loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

    19        55    74 
                  

Citigroup's Net Income (Loss)

 $101 $1,175 $(33)$(33)$134 $(581)$(662)$101 
                  

Table of Contents

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME

 
 Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 
In millions of dollars Citigroup
parent
company
 CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
Citigroup
subsidiaries,
eliminations
 Consolidating
adjustments
 Citigroup
consolidated
 
Revenues                         
Dividends from subsidiary banks and bank holding companies $35 $ $ $ $ $ $(35)$ 
                  
Interest revenue $177 $4,199 $1 $3,206 $3,659 $32,218 $(3,206)$40,254 
Interest revenue—intercompany  1,356  2,169  2,090  (1,643) 229  (5,844) 1,643   
Interest expense  4,212  1,416  965  46  219  7,687  (46) 14,499 
Interest expense—intercompany  (530) 1,800  439  (535) 865  (2,574) 535   
                  
Net interest revenue $(2,149)$3,152 $687 $2,052 $2,804 $21,261 $(2,052)$25,755 
                  
Commissions and fees $ $3,482 $ $22 $59 $6,064 $(22)$9,605 
Commissions and fees—intercompany    59    35  44  (103) (35)  
Principal transactions  117  (1,129) (259)     5,374    4,103 
Principal transactions—intercompany  (221) 3,910  (59)   (86) (3,544)    
Other income  4,672  12,620  75  209  347  (2,687) (209) 15,027 
Other income—intercompany  (4,391) (35) (61) 2  32  4,455  (2)  
                  
Total non-interest revenues $177 $18,907 $(304)$268 $396 $9,559 $(268)$28,735 
                  
Total revenues, net of interest expense $(1,937)$22,059 $383 $2,320 $3,200 $30,820 $(2,355)$54,490 
                  
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims $ $38 $ $1,938 $2,169 $20,776 $(1,938)$22,983 
                  
Expenses                         
Compensation and benefits $(45)$3,673 $ $259 $335 $8,631 $(259)$12,594 
Compensation and benefits—intercompany  3  335    71  71  (409) (71)  
Other expense  408  1,328  1  189  262  9,091  (189) 11,090 
Other expense—intercompany  97  340  5  273  305  (747) (273)  
                  
Total operating expenses $463 $5,676 $6 $792 $973 $16,566 $(792)$23,684 
                  
Income (Loss) before taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries $(2,400)$16,345 $377 $(410)$58 $(6,522)$375 $7,823 
Income taxes (benefits)  (1,045) 6,164  115  (148) 15  (3,507) 148  1,742 
Equities in undistributed income of subsidiaries  7,227            (7,227)  
                  
Income (Loss) from continuing operations $5,872 $10,181 $262 $(262)$43 $(3,015)$(7,000)$6,081 
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes            (259)   (259)
                  
Net income (Loss) before attribution of Noncontrolling Interests $5,872 $10,181 $262 $(262)$43 $(3,274)$(7,000)$5,822 
                  
Net Income (Loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests    (51)       1    (50)
                  
Citigroup's Net Income (Loss) $5,872 $10,232 $262 $(262)$43 $(3,275)$(7,000)$5,872 
                  

 
 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 
In millions of dollars Citigroup
parent
company
 CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
Citigroup
subsidiaries,
eliminations
 Consolidating
adjustments
 Citigroup
consolidated
 

Revenues

                         

Dividends from subsidiary banks and bank holding companies

 $1,040 $ $ $ $ $ $(1,040)$ 
                  

Interest revenue

 $234 $5,881 $1 $4,732 $5,418 $47,398 $(4,732)$58,932 

Interest revenue—intercompany

  1,833  2,079  3,143  46  325  (7,380) (46)  

Interest expense

  6,707  2,060  1,365  63  303  10,744  (63) 21,179 

Interest expense—intercompany

  (667) 1,635  699  1,677  1,242  (2,909) (1,677)  
                  

Net interest revenue

 $(3,973)$4,265 $1,080 $3,038 $4,198 $32,183 $(3,038)$37,753 
                  

Commissions and fees

 $ $4,711 $ $38 $95 $8,017 $(38)$12,823 

Commissions and fees—intercompany

    247    86  107  (354) (86)  

Principal transactions

  434  1,302  (869)   2  4,894    5,763 

Principal transactions—intercompany

  (714) 2,530  133    (99) (1,850)    

Other income

  3,514  13,296  (25) 321  489  1,267  (321) 18,541 

Other income—intercompany

  (1,906) (12) 16  2  37  1,865  (2)  
                  

Total non-interest revenues

 $1,328 $22,074 $(745)$447 $631 $13,839 $(447)$37,127 
                  

Total revenues, net of interest expense

 $(1,605)$26,339 $335 $3,485 $4,829 $46,022 $(4,525)$74,880 
                  

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 $ $96 $ $2,708 $3,044 $28,938 $(2,708)$32,078 
                  

Expenses

                         

Compensation and benefits

 $(89)$5,144 $ $393 $514 $13,161 $(393)$18,730 

Compensation and benefits— intercompany

  5  403    106  106  (514) (106)  

Other expense

  600  2,011  2  358  471  13,694  (358) 16,778 

Other expense—intercompany

  260  538  7  416  465  (1,270) (416)  
                  

Total operating expenses

 $776 $8,096 $9 $1,273 $1,556 $25,071 $(1,273)$35,508 
                  

Income (Loss) before taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries

 $(2,381)$18,147 $326 $(496)$229 $(7,987)$(544)$7,294 

Income taxes (benefits)

  (1,437) 6,772  97  (201) 52  (4,864) 201  620 

Equities in undistributed income of subsidiaries

  6,917            (6,917)  
                  

Income (Loss) from continuing operations

 $5,973 $11,375 $229 $(295)$177 $(3,123)$(7,662)$6,674 

Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes

            (677)   (677)
                  

Net income (Loss) before attribution of Noncontrolling Interests

 $5,973 $11,375 $229 $(295)$177 $(3,800)$(7,662)$5,997 
                  

Net Income (Loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

    (32)       56    24 
                  

Citigroup's Net Income (Loss)

 $5,973 $11,407 $229 $(295)$177 $(3,856)$(7,662)$5,973 
                  

Table of Contents

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME

 
 Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 
In millions of dollars Citigroup
parent
company
 CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
Citigroup
subsidiaries,
eliminations
 Consolidating
adjustments
 Citigroup
consolidated
 

Revenues

                         

Dividends from subsidiary banks and bank holding companies

 $169 $ $ $ $ $ $(169)$ 
                  

Interest revenue

 $226 $4,455 $ $1,819 $2,084 $19,365 $(1,819)$26,130 

Interest revenue—intercompany

  1,098  565  1,269  21  147  (3,079) (21)  

Interest expense

  2,388  2,740  835  33  154  6,609  (33) 12,726 

Interest expense—intercompany

  (101) 1,867  (1) 605  490  (2,255) (605)  
                  

Net interest revenue

 $(963)$413 $435 $1,202 $1,587 $11,932 $(1,202)$13,404 
                  

Commissions and fees

 $ $1,841 $ $20 $43 $1,324 $(20)$3,208 

Commissions and fees—intercompany

  346  21    9  11  (378) (9)  

Principal transactions

  (497) (3,318) 2,239    (1) (1,436)   (3,013)

Principal transactions—intercompany

  335  (900) (1,542)   36  2,071     

Other income

  332  784  (130) 65  87  1,586  (65) 2,659 

Other income—intercompany

  206  35  97  8  3  (341) (8)  
                  

Total non-interest revenues

 $722 $(1,537)$664 $102 $179 $2,826 $(102)$2,854 
                  

Total revenues, net of interest expense

 $(72)$(1,124)$1,099 $1,304 $1,766 $14,758 $(1,473)$16,258 
                  

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 $ $7 $ $1,288 $1,368 $7,692 $(1,288)$9,067 
                  

Expenses

                         

Compensation and benefits

 $(57)$2,244 $ $174 $232 $5,125 $(174)$7,544 

Compensation and benefits— intercompany

  2  226    46  46  (274) (46)  

Other expense

  42  925  1  159  208  5,287  (159) 6,463 

Other expense—intercompany

  451  (120) 3  174  162  (496) (174)  
                  

Total operating expenses

 $438 $3,275 $4 $553 $648 $9,642 $(553)$14,007 
                  

Income (Loss) before taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries

 $(510)$(4,406)$1,095 $(537)$(250)$(2,576)$368 $(6,816)

Income taxes (benefits)

  (868) (1,893) 376  (185) (77) (833) 185  (3,295)

Equities in undistributed income of subsidiaries

  (3,386)           3,386   
                  

Income (Loss) from continuing operations

 $(3,028)$(2,513)$719 $(352)$(173)$(1,743)$3,569 $(3,521)

Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes

  213          400    613 
                  

Net income (Loss) before attribution of Noncontrolling Interests

 $(2,815)$(2,513)$719 $(352)$(173)$(1,343)$3,569 $(2,908)
                  

Net Income (Loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

            (93)   (93)
                  

Citigroup's Net Income (Loss)

 $(2,815)$(2,513)$719 $(352)$(173)$(1,250)$3,569 $(2,815)
                  

Table of Contents

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME

 
 Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 
In millions of dollars Citigroup
parent
company
 CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
Citigroup
subsidiaries,
eliminations
 Consolidating
adjustments
 Citigroup
consolidated
 
Revenues                         
Dividends from subsidiary banks and bank holding companies $82 $ $ $ $ $ $(82)$ 
                  
Interest revenue $184 $4,960 $1 $1,816 $2,102 $20,090 $(1,816)$27,337 
Interest revenue—intercompany  1,104  554  1,230  25  143  (3,031) (25)  
Interest expense  2,308  3,273  849  34  162  6,759  (34) 13,351 
Interest expense—intercompany  (114) 1,020  79  608  468  (1,453) (608)  
                  
Net interest revenue $(906)$1,221 $303 $1,199 $1,615 $11,753 $(1,199)$13,986 
                  
Commissions and fees $ $2,307 $1 $21 $45 $3,446 $(21)$5,799 
Commissions and fees—intercompany  (336) 360    8  10  (34) (8)  
Principal transactions  (456) (9,514) 469    4  3,695    (5,802)
Principal transactions—intercompany  64  5,404  (523)   (33) (4,912)    
Other income  1,867  1,050  151  112  157  330  (112) 3,555 
Other income—intercompany  (1,545) 44  (134) 6  49  1,586  (6)  
                  
Total non-interest revenues $(406)$(349)$(36)$147 $232 $4,111 $(147)$3,552 
                  
Total revenues, net of interest expense $(1,230)$872 $267 $1,346 $1,847 $15,864 $(1,428)$17,538 
                  
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims $ $284 $ $769 $861 $5,955 $(769)$7,100 
                  
Expenses                         
Compensation and benefits $(42)$2,680 $ $173 $241 $5,813 $(173)$8,692 
Compensation and benefits—intercompany  2  231    50  50  (283) (50)  
Other expense  67  964  1  132  175  5,315  (132) 6,522 
Other expense—intercompany  112  502  31  81  101  (746) (81)  
                  
Total operating expenses $139 $4,377 $32 $436 $567 $10,099 $(436)$15,214 
                  
Income (Loss) before taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries $(1,369)$(3,789)$235 $141 $419 $(190)$(223)$(4,776)
Income taxes (benefits)  (338) (1,636) 80  56  147  (700) (56) (2,447)
Equities in undistributed income of subsidiaries  (1,464)           1,464   
                  
Income (Loss) from continuing operations $(2,495)$(2,153)$155 $85 $272 $510 $1,297 $(2,329)
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes            (94)   (94)
                  
Net income (Loss) before attribution of Noncontrolling Interests $(2,495)$(2,153)$155 $85 $272 $416 $1,297 $(2,423)
                  
Net Income (Loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests            72    72 
                  
Citigroup's Net Income (Loss) $(2,495)$(2,153)$155 $85 $272 $344 $1,297 $(2,495)
                  


Table of Contents

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME


 Six Months Ended June 30, 2008  Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 
In millions of dollars Citigroup
parent
company
 CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
Citigroup
subsidiaries,
eliminations
 Consolidating
adjustments
 Citigroup
consolidated
  Citigroup
parent
company
 CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
Citigroup
subsidiaries,
eliminations
 Consolidating
adjustments
 Citigroup
consolidated
 
Revenues  
Dividends from subsidiary banks and bank holding companies $1,448 $ $ $ $ $ $(1,448)$  $1,617 $ $ $ $ $ $(1,617)$ 
                                  
Interest revenue $318 $10,784 $1 $3,628 $4,194 $41,201 $(3,628)$56,498  $544 $15,239 $1 $5,447 $6,278 $60,566 $(5,447)$82,628 
Interest revenue—intercompany 2,410 999 2,642 36 294 (6,345) (36)   3,508 1,564 3,911 57 441 (9,424) (57)   
Interest expense 4,599 7,336 1,810 75 337 15,342 (75) 29,424  6,987 10,076 2,645 108 491 21,951 (108) 42,150 
Interest expense—intercompany (141) 2,426 187 1,232 1,161 (3,633) (1,232)   (242) 4,293 186 1,837 1,651 (5,888) (1,837)  
                                  
Net interest revenue $(1,730)$2,021 $646 $2,357 $2,990 $23,147 $(2,357)$27,074  $(2,693)$2,434 $1,081 $3,559 $4,577 $35,079 $(3,559)$40,478 
                                  
Commissions and fees $ $4,540 $1 $41 $92 $2,507 $(41)$7,140  $ $6,381 $1 $61 $135 $3,831 $(61)$10,348 
Commissions and fees—intercompany (346) 432  15 21 (107) (15)    453  24 32 (485) (24)  
Principal transactions 502 (17,082) 1,285   2,861  (12,434) 5 (20,400) 3,524  (1) 1,425  (15,447)
Principal transactions—intercompany (220) 5,580 (1,105)  (10) (4,245)    115 4,680 (2,647)  26 (2,174)   
Other income 111 2,014 85 221 291 5,414 (221) 7,915  443 2,798 (45) 286 378 7,000 (286) 10,574 
Other income—intercompany (239) 584 (64) 13 75 (356) (13)   (33) 619 33 21 78 (697) (21)   
                                  
Total non-interest revenues $(192)$(3,932)$202 $290 $469 $6,074 $(290)$2,621  $530 $(5,469)$866 $392 $648 $8,900 $(392)$5,475 
                                  
Total revenues, net of interest expense $(474)$(1,911)$848 $2,647 $3,459 $29,221 $(4,095)$29,695  $(546)$(3,035)$1,947 $3,951 $5,225 $43,979 $(5,568)$45,953 
                                  
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims $ $300 $ $1,758 $1,947 $10,705 $(1,758)$12,952  $ $307 $ $3,046 $3,315 $18,397 $(3,046)$22,019 
                                  
Expenses  
Compensation and benefits $(49)$5,484 $ $371 $515 $11,304 $(371)$17,254  $(106)$7,728 $ $545 $747 $16,429 $(545)$24,798 
Compensation and benefits—intercompany 4 467  99 100 (571) (99)  

Compensation and benefits— intercompany

 6 693  145 146 (845) (145)  
Other expense 116 1,923 1 257 342 10,955 (257) 13,337  158 2,855 2 416 550 16,235 (416) 19,800 
Other expense—intercompany 145 831 46 162 205 (1,227) (162)   596 711 49 336 367 (1,723) (336)  
                                  
Total operating expenses $216 $8,705 $47 $889 $1,162 $20,461 $(889)$30,591  $654 $11,987 $51 $1,442 $1,810 $30,096 $(1,442)$44,598 
                                  
Income (Loss) before taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries $(690)$(10,916)$801 $ $350 $(1,945)$(1,448)$(13,848) $(1,200)$(15,329)$1,896 $(537)$100 $(4,514)$(1,080)$(20,664)
Income taxes (benefits) (775) (4,380) 280 11 131 (1,589) (11) (6,333) (1,643) (6,273) 656 (174) 54 (2,422) 174 (9,628)
Equities in undistributed income of subsidiaries (7,691)      7,691   (11,077)      11,077  
                                  
Income (Loss) from continuing operations $(7,606)$(6,536)$521 $(11)$219 $(356)$6,254 $(7,515) $(10,634)$(9,056)$1,240 $(363)$46 $(2,092)$9,823 $(11,036)
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes      (35)  (35) 213     365  578 
                                  
Net income (Loss) before attribution of Noncontrolling Interests $(7,606)$(6,536)$521 $(11)$219 $(391)$6,254 $(7,550) $(10,421)$(9,056)$1,240 $(363)$46 $(1,727)$9,823 $(10,458)
                                  
Net Income (Loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests      56  56   (7)    (30)  (37)
                                  
Citigroup's Net Income (Loss) $(7,606)$(6,536)$521 $(11)$219 $(447)$6,254 $(7,606) $(10,421)$(9,049)$1,240 $(363)$46 $(1,697)$9,823 $(10,421)
                                  

Table of Contents

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET

 
 June 30, 2009 
In millions of dollars Citigroup
parent
company
 CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
Citigroup
subsidiaries
and
eliminations
 Consolidating
adjustments
 Citigroup
consolidated
 
Assets                         
Cash and due from banks $ $3,044 $ $152 $236 $23,635 $(152)$26,915 
Cash and due from banks—intercompany  22  804  1  142  157  (984) (142)  
Federal funds sold and resale agreements    159,116        20,387    179,503 
Federal funds sold and resale agreements—intercompany    23,319        (23,319)    
Trading account assets  22  138,647  66    15  186,287    325,037 
Trading account assets—intercompany  1,511  9,355  1,450    118  (12,434)    
Investments  10,902  308    2,263  2,550  252,997  (2,263) 266,757 
Loans, net of unearned income    505    45,181  51,529  589,656  (45,181) 641,690 
Loans, net of unearned income—intercompany      146,367  5,393  6,755  (153,122) (5,393)  
Allowance for loan losses    (148)   (3,497) (3,812) (31,980) 3,497  (35,940)
                  
Total loans, net $ $357 $146,367 $47,077 $54,472 $404,554 $(47,077)$605,750 
Advances to subsidiaries  139,347          (139,347)    
Investments in subsidiaries  199,984            (199,984)  
Other assets  16,042  74,306  431  6,118  7,015  327,365  (6,118) 425,159 
Other assets—intercompany  9,450  56,526  2,885  218  1,345  (70,206) (218)  
Assets of discontinued operations held for sale            19,412    19,412 
                  
Total assets $377,280 $465,782 $151,200 $55,970 $65,908 $988,347 $(255,954)$1,848,533 
                  
Liabilities and equity                         
Deposits $ $ $ $ $ $804,736 $ $804,736 
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold    136,748        35,268    172,016 
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold—intercompany  185  6,279        (6,464)    
Trading account liabilities    68,564  72      50,676    119,312 
Trading account liabilities—intercompany  842  8,788  1,455      (11,085)    
Short-term borrowings  2,430  5,636  28,712    169  64,947    101,894 
Short-term borrowings—intercompany    89,049  70,863  12,766  35,663  (195,575) (12,766)  
Long-term debt  192,295  15,134  44,120  1,764  6,917  89,580  (1,764) 348,046 
Long-term debt—intercompany  640  46,027  1,208  33,480  15,661  (63,536) (33,480)  
Advances from subsidiaries  16,988          (16,988)    
Other liabilities  5,765  62,777  683  1,938  1,647  65,115  (1,938) 135,987 
Other liabilities—intercompany  5,833  8,301  126  774  340  (14,600) (774)  
Liabilities of discontinued operations held for sale            12,374    12,374 
                  
Total liabilities $224,978 $447,303 $147,239 $50,722 $60,397 $814,448 $(50,722)$1,694,365 
                  
Citigroup stockholder's equity $152,302 $18,090 $3,961 $5,248 $5,511 $172,422 $(205,232)$152,302 
Noncontrolling interest    389        1,477    1,866 
                  
Total equity $152,302 $18,479 $3,961 $5,248 $5,511 $173,899 $(205,232)$154,168 
                  
Total liabilities and equity $377,280 $465,782 $151,200 $55,970 $65,908 $988,347 $(255,954)$1,848,533 
                  

 
 September 30, 2009 
In millions of dollars Citigroup
parent
company
 CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
Citigroup
subsidiaries
and
eliminations
 Consolidating
adjustments
 Citigroup
consolidated
 

Assets

                         

Cash and due from banks

 $ $2,798 $ $181 $257 $23,427 $(181)$26,482 

Cash and due from banks—intercompany

  16  1,609  1  140  159  (1,785) (140)  

Federal funds sold and resale agreements

    176,406        20,951    197,357 

Federal funds sold and resale agreements—intercompany

    23,165        (23,165)    

Trading account assets

  25  145,444  41    16  195,171    340,697 

Trading account assets—intercompany

  1,152  8,592  811    6  (10,561)    

Investments

  11,227  274    2,456  2,720  247,669  (2,456) 261,890 

Loans, net of unearned income

    430    43,534  49,907  571,874  (43,534) 622,211 

Loans, net of unearned income—intercompany

      144,343  3,512  6,716  (151,059) (3,512)  

Allowance for loan losses

    (139)   (3,425) (3,766) (32,511) 3,425  (36,416)
                  

Total loans, net

 $ $291 $144,343 $43,621 $52,857 $388,304 $(43,621)$585,795 

Advances to subsidiaries

  145,529          (145,529)    

Investments in subsidiaries

  210,989            (210,989)  

Other assets

  12,295  69,947  728  6,161  7,014  362,790  (6,161) 452,774 

Other assets—intercompany

  10,853  54,776  3,235  31  1,353  (70,217) (31)  

Assets of discontinued operations held for sale

            23,604    23,604 
                  

Total assets

 $392,086 $483,302 $149,159 $52,590 $64,382 $1,010,659 $(263,579)$1,888,599 
                  

Liabilities and equity

                         

Deposits

 $ $ $ $ $ $832,603 $ $832,603 

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold

    139,681        38,478    178,159 

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold—intercompany

  185  4,485        (4,670)    

Trading account liabilities

    77,681  52      52,807    130,540 

Trading account liabilities—intercompany

  989  8,839  1,260      (11,088)    

Short-term borrowings

  1,249  5,554  10,065    434  47,429    64,731 

Short-term borrowings—intercompany

    91,015  80,610  5,135  34,483  (206,108) (5,135)  

Long-term debt

  214,981  15,403  51,208  1,677  6,348  91,617  (1,677) 379,557 

Long-term debt—intercompany

  445  46,273  1,208  37,868  15,453  (63,379) (37,868)  

Advances from subsidiaries

  21,958          (21,958)    

Other liabilities

  5,819  66,135  651  1,910  1,588  69,863  (1,910) 144,056 

Other liabilities—intercompany

  5,618  9,378  177  700  325  (15,498) (700)  

Liabilities of discontinued operations held for sale

            16,004    16,004 
                  

Total liabilities

 $251,244 $464,444 $145,231 $47,290 $58,631 $826,100 $(47,290)$1,745,650 
                  

Citigroup stockholder's equity

 $140,842 $18,443 $3,928 $5,300 $5,751 $182,867 $(216,289)$140,842 

Noncontrolling interest

    415        1,692    2,107 
                  

Total equity

 $140,842 $18,858 $3,928 $5,300 $5,751 $184,559 $(216,289)$142,949 
                  

Total liabilities and equity

 $392,086 $483,302 $149,159 $52,590 $64,382 $1,010,659 $(263,579)$1,888,599 
                  

Table of Contents

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET

 
 December 31, 2008 
In millions of dollars Citigroup
parent
company
 CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
Citigroup
subsidiaries
and
eliminations
 Consolidating
adjustments
 Citigroup
consolidated
 
Assets                         
Cash and due from banks $ $3,142 $ $149 $211 $25,900 $(149)$29,253 
Cash and due from banks—intercompany  13  1,415  1  141  185  (1,614) (141)  
Federal funds sold and resale agreements    167,589        16,544    184,133 
Federal funds sold and resale agreements—intercompany    31,446        (31,446)    
Trading account assets  20  155,136  88    15  222,376    377,635 
Trading account assets—intercompany  818  11,197  4,439    182  (16,636)    
Investments  25,611  382    2,059  2,366  227,661  (2,059) 256,020 
Loans, net of unearned income    663    48,663  55,387  638,166  (48,663) 694,216 
Loans, net of unearned income—intercompany      134,744  3,433  11,129  (145,873) (3,433)  
Allowance for loan losses    (122)   (3,415) (3,649) (25,845) 3,415  (29,616)
                  
Total loans, net $ $541 $134,744 $48,681 $62,867 $466,448 $(48,681)$664,600 
Advances to subsidiaries  167,043          (167,043)    
Investments in subsidiaries  149,424            (149,424)  
Other assets  12,148  74,740  51  6,156  6,970  332,920  (6,156) 426,829 
Other assets—intercompany  14,998  108,952  3,997  254  504  (128,451) (254)  
                  
Total assets $370,075 $554,540 $143,320 $57,440 $73,300 $946,659 $(206,864)$1,938,470 
                  
Liabilities and equity                         
Deposits $ $ $ $ $ $774,185 $ $774,185 
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold    165,914        39,379    205,293 
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold—intercompany  8,673  34,007        (42,680)    
Trading account liabilities    70,006  14      97,458    167,478 
Trading account liabilities—intercompany  732  12,751  2,660      (16,143)    
Short-term borrowings  2,571  9,735  30,994    222  83,169    126,691 
Short-term borrowings—intercompany    87,432  66,615  6,360  39,637  (193,684) (6,360)  
Long-term debt  192,290  20,623  37,374  2,214  8,333  100,973  (2,214) 359,593 
Long-term debt—intercompany    60,318  878  40,722  17,655  (78,851) (40,722)  
Advances from subsidiaries  7,660          (7,660)    
Other liabilities  7,347  75,247  855  1,907  1,808  75,951  (1,907) 161,208 
Other liabilities—intercompany  9,172  10,213  232  833  332  (19,949) (833)  
                  
Total liabilities $228,445 $546,246 $139,622 $52,036 $67,987 $812,148 $(52,036)$1,794,448 
                  
Citigroup stockholders' equity  141,630  7,819  3,698  5,404  5,313  132,594  (154,828) 141,630 
Noncontrolling interest    475        1,917    2,392 
                  
Total equity $141,630 $8,294 $3,698 $5,404 $5,313 $134,511 $(154,828)$144,022 
                  
Total liabilities and equity $370,075 $554,540 $$143,320 $57,440 $73,300 $946,659 $(206,864)$1,938,470 
                  

 
 December 31, 2008 
In millions of dollars Citigroup
parent
company
 CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
Citigroup
subsidiaries
and
eliminations
 Consolidating
adjustments
 Citigroup
consolidated
 

Assets

                         

Cash and due from banks

 $ $3,142 $ $149 $211 $25,900 $(149)$29,253 

Cash and due from banks—intercompany

  13  1,415  1  141  185  (1,614) (141)  

Federal funds sold and resale agreements

    167,589        16,544    184,133 

Federal funds sold and resale agreements—intercompany

    31,446        (31,446)    

Trading account assets

  20  155,136  88    15  222,376    377,635 

Trading account assets—intercompany

  818  11,197  4,439    182  (16,636)    

Investments

  25,611  382    2,059  2,366  227,661  (2,059) 256,020 

Loans, net of unearned income

    663    48,663  55,387  638,166  (48,663) 694,216 

Loans, net of unearned income—intercompany

      134,744  3,433  11,129  (145,873) (3,433)  

Allowance for loan losses

    (122)   (3,415) (3,649) (25,845) 3,415  (29,616)
                  

Total loans, net

 $ $541 $134,744 $48,681 $62,867 $466,448 $(48,681)$664,600 

Advances to subsidiaries

  167,043          (167,043)    

Investments in subsidiaries

  149,424            (149,424)  

Other assets

  12,148  74,740  51  6,156  6,970  332,920  (6,156) 426,829 

Other assets—intercompany

  14,998  108,952  3,997  254  504  (128,451) (254)  
                  

Total assets

 $370,075 $554,540 $143,320 $57,440 $73,300 $946,659 $(206,864)$1,938,470 
                  

Liabilities and equity

                         

Deposits

 $ $ $ $ $ $774,185 $ $774,185 

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold

    165,914        39,379    205,293 

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold—intercompany

  8,673  34,007        (42,680)    

Trading account liabilities

    70,006  14      95,780    165,800 

Trading account liabilities—intercompany

  732  12,751  2,660      (16,143)    

Short-term borrowings

  2,571  9,735  30,994    222  83,169    126,691 

Short-term borrowings—intercompany

    87,432  66,615  6,360  39,637  (193,684) (6,360)  

Long-term debt

  192,290  20,623  37,374  2,214  8,333  100,973  (2,214) 359,593 

Long-term debt—intercompany

    60,318  878  40,722  17,655  (78,851) (40,722)  

Advances from subsidiaries

  7,660          (7,660)    

Other liabilities

  7,347  75,247  855  1,907  1,808  77,629  (1,907) 162,886 

Other liabilities—intercompany

  9,172  10,213  232  833  332  (19,949) (833)  
                  

Total liabilities

 $228,445 $546,246 $139,622 $52,036 $67,987 $812,148 $(52,036)$1,794,448 
                  

Citigroup stockholders' equity

  141,630  7,819  3,698  5,404  5,313  132,594  (154,828) 141,630 

Noncontrolling interest

    475        1,917    2,392 
                  

Total equity

 $141,630 $8,294 $3,698 $5,404 $5,313 $134,511 $(154,828)$144,022 
                  

Total liabilities and equity

 $370,075 $554,540 $$143,320 $57,440 $73,300 $946,659 $(206,864)$1,938,470 
                  

Table of Contents

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 
 Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 
In millions of dollars Citigroup
parent
company
 CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
Citigroup
subsidiaries
and
eliminations
 Consolidating
adjustments
 Citigroup
Consolidated
 
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities $(3,928)$21,483 $2,262 $2,226 $2,008 $(42,562)$(2,226)$(20,737)
                  
Cash flows from investing activities                         
Change in loans $ $ $(11,257)$1,081 $1,175 $(76,652)$(1,081)$(86,734)
Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans    163        126,871    127,034 
Purchases of investments  (12,895) (13)   (401) (431) (107,022) 401  (120,361)
Proceeds from sales of investments  6,892      159  191  40,358  (159) 47,441 
Proceeds from maturities of investments  19,559      185  216  37,761  (185) 57,536 
Changes in investments and advances—intercompany  (12,386)     (1,960) 4,374  8,012  1,960   
Business acquisitions                 
Other investing activities    (4,104)       (4,355)   (8,459)
                  
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities $1,170 $(3,954)$(11,257)$(936)$5,525 $24,973 $936 $16,457 
                  
Cash flows from financing activities                         
Dividends paid $(2,539)$ $ $ $ $ $  (2,539)
Dividends paid-intercompany  (119)         119     
Issuance of common stock                 
Issuance of preferred stock                 
Treasury stock acquired  (2)             (2)
Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt—third-party, net  4,231  (1,515) 6,975  (450) (1,416) (14,722) 450  (6,447)
Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt-intercompany, net    (14,241)   (7,242) (1,994) 16,235  7,242   
Change in deposits            30,552    30,552 
Net change in short-term borrowings and other investment banking and brokerage borrowings—third-party    (4,099) (2,372) 6,406  (152) (13,874) (6,406) (20,497)
Net change in short-term borrowings and other advances—intercompany  1,304  1,617  4,397    (3,974) (3,344)    
Capital contributions from parent                 
Other financing activities  (108)   (5)     5    (108)
                  
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities $2,767 $(18,238)$8,995 $(1,286)$(7,536)$14,971 $1,286 $959 
                  
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and due from banks $         $171   $171 
                  
Net cash used in discontinued operations $         $812   $812 
                  
Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks $9 $(709)$ $4 $(3)$(1,635)$(4)$(2,338)
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period  13  4,557  1  290  396  24,286  (290) 29,253 
                  
Cash and due from banks at end of period $22 $3,848 $1 $294 $393 $22,651 $(294)$26,915 
                  
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information                         
Cash paid during the year for:                         
Income taxes $(36)$(522)$280 $(172)$193 $(500)$172 $(585)
Interest  4,282  4,448  1,641  1,893  408  4,305  (1,893) 15,084 
Non-cash investing activities:                         
Transfers to repossessed assets $ $ $ $779 $806 $557 $(779)$1,363 
                  

 
 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 
In millions of dollars Citigroup
parent
company
 CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
Citigroup
subsidiaries
and
eliminations
 Consolidating
adjustments
 Citigroup
Consolidated
 

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

 $(1,854)$18,928 $2,185 $3,312 $3,757 $(36,850)$(3,312)$(13,834)
                  

Cash flows from investing activities

                         

Change in loans

 $ $ $(9,324)$1,528 $1,504 $(119,841)$(1,528)$(127,661)

Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans

    163        185,279    185,442 

Purchases of investments

  (13,777) (13)   (531) (579) (152,746) 531  (167,115)

Proceeds from sales of investments

  6,892      398  435  59,563  (398) 66,890 

Proceeds from maturities of investments

  20,209      230  309  69,700  (230) 90,218 

Changes in investments and advances—intercompany

  (20,968)     (290) 4,202  16,766  290   

Business acquisitions

                 

Other investing activities

    (775)       (42,291)   (43,066)
                  

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

 $(7,644)$(625)$(9,324)$1,335 $5,871 $16,430 $(1,335)$4,708 
                  

Cash flows from financing activities

                         

Dividends paid

 $(3,235)$ $ $ $ $ $  (3,235)

Dividends paid—intercompany

  (122) (1,000)       1,122     

Issuance of common stock

                 

Issuance of preferred stock

                 

Treasury stock acquired

  (3)             (3)

Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt—third-party, net

  12,235  (2,406) 14,020  (537) (1,985) (15,250) 537  6,614 

Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt—intercompany, net

    (14,450)   (2,854) (2,202) 16,652  2,854   

Change in deposits

            58,418    58,418 

Net change in short-term borrowings and other investment banking and brokerage borrowings—third-party

  (1,339) (4,181) (20,932) (1,225) (226) (29,465) 1,225  (56,143)

Net change in short-term borrowings and other advances—intercompany

  2,081  3,583  14,056    (5,154) (14,566)    

Capital contributions from parent

                 

Other financing activities

  (116)   (5)   (41) 46    (116)
                  

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 $9,501 $(18,454)$7,139 $(4,616)$(9,608)$16,957 $4,616 $5,535 
                  

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and due from banks

 $         $582   $582 
                  

Net cash used in discontinued operations

 $         $238   $238 
                  

Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks

 $3 $(151)$ $31 $20 $(2,643)$(31)$(2,771)

Cash and due from banks at beginning of period

  13  4,557  1  290  396  24,286  (290) 29,253 
                  

Cash and due from banks at end of period

 $16 $4,406 $1 $321 $416 $21,643 $(321)$26,482 
                  

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information

                         

Cash paid during the year for:

                         

Income taxes

 $613 $(743)$422 $96 $381 $(1,924)$(96)$(1,251)

Interest

  6,190  6,006  2,232  2,454  469  6,441  (2,454) 21,338 

Non-cash investing activities:

                         

Transfers to repossessed assets

 $ $ $ $1,217 $1,261 $888 $(1,217)$2,149 
                  

Table of Contents

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 
 Six Months Ended June, 2008 
In millions of dollars Citigroup
parent
company
 CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
Citigroup
subsidiaries
and
eliminations
 Consolidating
adjustments
 Citigroup
Consolidated
 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations $2,478 $849 $891 $2,225 $2,383 $46,547 $(2,225)$53,148 
                  
Cash flows from investing activities                         
Change in loans $ $91 $(6,360)$(2,288)$(2,442)$(126,192)$2,288 $(134,903)
Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans    26        142,913    142,939 
Purchases of investments  (124,202) (159)   (525) (734) (88,375) 525  (213,470)
Proceeds from sales of investments  10,206      128  275  48,784  (128) 59,265 
Proceeds from maturities of investments  89,480    2  278  316  41,668  (278) 131,466 
Changes in investments and advances—intercompany  (15,297)     (1,695) (525) 15,822  1,695   
Business acquisitions                 
Other investing activities    (20,351)       22,479    2,128 
                  
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities $(39,813)$(20,393)$(6,358)$(4,102)$(3,110)$57,099 $4,102 $(12,575)
                  
Cash flows from financing activities                         
Dividends paid $(3,873)$ $ $ $ $ $ $(3,873)
Dividends paid-intercompany  (119) (59)       178     
Issuance of common stock  4,961              4,961 
Issuance/(Redemptions) of preferred stock  27,424              27,424 
Treasury stock acquired  (6)             (6)
Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt—third-party, net  10,015  (8,685) 8,599  (618) (1,414) (16,417) 618  (7,902)
Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt-intercompany, net    19,176    (3,284) (2,176) (17,000) 3,284   
Change in deposits            (22,588)   (22,588)
Net change in short-term borrowings and other investment banking and brokerage borrowings—third-party  (4,347) (1,521) (1,941)   352  (24,586)   (32,043)
Net change in short-term borrowings and other advances—intercompany  3,611  9,430  (1,163) 5,764  3,955  (15,833) (5,764)  
Capital contributions from parent                 
Other financing activities  (325)             (325)
                  
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities $37,341 $18,341 $5,495 $1,862 $717 $(96,246)$(1,862)$(34,352)
                  
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and due from banks $ $ $ $ $ $212 $ $212 
                  
Net cash from discontinued operations $ $ $ $ $ $185 $ $185 
                  
Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks $6 $(1,203)$28 $(15)$(10)$7,797 $15 $6,618 
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period  19  5,297  2  321  440  32,448  (321) 38,206 
                  
Cash and due from banks at end of period $25 $4,094 $30 $306 $430 $40,245 $(306)$44,824 
                  
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information                         
Cash paid during the year for:                         
Income taxes $952 $(2,599)$160 $149 $24 $2,378 $(149)$915 
Interest  4,853  10,249  2,113  1,428  184  13,457  (1,428) 30,856 
Non-cash investing activities:                         
Transfers to repossessed assets $ $ $ $712 $741 $764 $(712)$1,505 
                  

 
 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 
In millions of dollars Citigroup
parent
company
 CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
Citigroup
subsidiaries
and
eliminations
 Consolidating
adjustments
 Citigroup
Consolidated
 

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities of continuing operations

 $(1,519)$4,587 $1,981 $3,232 $2,920 $90,977 $(3,232)$98,946 
                  

Cash flows from investing activities

                         

Change in loans

 $ $67 $1,379 $(3,434)$(2,003)$(187,302) 3,434 $(187,859)

Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans

    91        203,772    203,863 

Purchases of investments

  (167,093) (134)   (945) (1,142) (104,446) 945  (272,815)

Proceeds from sales of investments

  11,727      208  473  48,055  (208) 60,255 

Proceeds from maturities of investments

  137,005    2  475  584  56,721  (475) 194,312 

Changes in investments and advances—intercompany

  (20,954)     (1,054) 913  20,041  1,054   

Business acquisitions

                 

Other investing activities

    (19,046)       23,253    4,207 
                  

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

 $(39,315)$(19,022)$1,381 $(4,750)$(1,175)$60,094 $4,750 $1,963 
                  

Cash flows from financing activities

                         

Dividends paid

 $(6,008)$ $ $ $ $ $ $(6,008)

Dividends paid-intercompany

  (180) (84)       264     

Issuance of common stock

  4,961              4,961 

Issuance/(Redemptions) of preferred stock

  27,424              27,424 

Treasury stock acquired

  (6)         (1)   (7)

Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt—third-party, net

  14,608  (9,068) 6,188  (720) (2,223) (36,267) 720  (26,762)

Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt—intercompany, net

    23,322    (1,513) (2,181) (21,141) 1,513   

Change in deposits

            (32,411)   (32,411)

Net change in short-term borrowings and other investment banking and brokerage borrowings—third-party

  (3,196) (5,269) (9,096)   (105) (23,967)   (41,633)

Net change in short-term borrowings and other advances—intercompany

  3,622  4,873  (448) 3,724  2,721  (10,768) (3,724)  

Capital contributions from parent

      (1)     1     

Other financing activities

  (377)             (377)
                  

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 $40,848 $13,774 $(3,357)$1,491 $(1,788)$(124,290)$(1,491)$(74,813)
                  

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and due from banks

 $ $ $ $ $ $(1,105)$ $(1,105)
                  

Net cash from discontinued operations

 $ $ $ $ $ $(171)$ $(171)
                  

Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks

 $14 $(661)$5 $(27)$(43)$25,505 $27 $24,820 

Cash and due from banks at beginning of period

  19  5,297  2  321  440  32,448  (321) 38,206 
                  

Cash and due from banks at end of period

 $33 $4,636 $7 $294 $397 $57,953  (294)$63,026 
                  

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information

                         

Cash paid during the year for:

                         

Income taxes

 $339 $(2,867)$261 $304 $261 $4,129 $(304)$2,123 

Interest

  7,083  14,582  2,916  1,428  252  19,461  (1,428) 44,294 

Non-cash investing activities:

                         

Transfers to repossessed assets

 $ $ $ $1,108 $1,148 $1,426 $(1,108)$2,574 
                  

Table of Contents


PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.    Legal Proceedings

        The following information supplements and amends our discussion set forth under Part I, Item 3 "Legal Proceedings" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as updated by our Quarterly ReportReports on Form 10-Q for the quarterquarters ended March 31, 2009.

Enron

        On May 14, 2009 a settlement agreement was executed among the parties in DK ACQUISITION PARTNERS, L.P., ET AL. v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE & CO., ET AL. and AVENUE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT II, L.P., ET AL. v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE & CO., ET AL. On June 3, 2009, a settlement agreement was executed among the parties in UNICREDITO ITALIANO, SpA, ET AL. v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, ET AL. The three actions, which were consolidated and pending trial in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, were brought against Citigroup and certain of its affiliates, and JPMorgan Chase and certain of its affiliates, in their capacity as co-agents on certain Enron revolving credit facilities. Pursuant to the settlements, the cases were dismissed with prejudice.

Research

        On June 3, 2009, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit certified several Georgia state law questions to be resolved by the Georgia Supreme Court in HOLMES, ET AL. v. GRUBMAN, ET AL.30, 2009.

Subprime Mortgage—Related Litigation and Other Matters

        Securities Actions.    On April 17,July 22, 2009, a putative class actionplaintiffs in BRECHER, ET AL. v. CGMI, ET AL. was filed in California state court assertingvoluntarily dismissed the claims against the individual defendants and moved to remand the remaining action against Citigroup, CGMI, and certainthe Personnel and Compensation Committee to state court. On September 8, 2009, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California ordered that defendants show cause as to why there was federal jurisdiction over the Company's current and former directors under California's Business and Professions Code and Labor Code, as well as under California common law, relatingcase. On September 17, 2009, defendants responded to among other things, losses incurred on common stock awarded to Smith Barney financial advisors in connection with the execution of their employment contracts.district court's order.

        On May 19, 2009, an amended complaint was filed. On July 9,August 7, 2009, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation was notified thattransferred BRECHER, ET AL. v. CGMI,CITIGROUP INC., ET AL. is a potential tag-along action to the Southern District of New York for coordination with IN RE CITIGROUP INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION.

        On July 15,August 19, 2009, after having removedKOCH, ET AL. v. CITIGROUP INC., ET AL., a putative class action, was filed in the caseUnited States District Court for the Southern District of California on behalf of participants in Citigroup's Voluntary FA Capital Accumulation Program ("FA CAP Program") against various defendants, including Citigroup and CGMI, asserting claims under the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Minnesota state law in connection with plaintiffs' acquisition of certain securities through the FA CAP Program. On September 30, 2009, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation conditionally transferred KOCH to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York as a potential tag-along to IN RE CITIGROUP INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION. On October 8, 2009, a consolidated amended complaint was filed in BRECHER, ET AL. v. CITIGROUP INC., ET AL. in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, asserting claims under the federal securities laws and Minnesota and California defendants filed motionsstate law. The complaint purports to dismissconsolidate the complaint and to stay all further proceedings pending resolution of the tag-along petition.similar claims asserted in KOCH.

        On May 7,August 31, 2009, BUCKINGHAMASHER, ET AL. v. CITIGROUP INC., ET AL. and CHENPELLEGRINI, ET AL. v. CITIGROUP INC., ET AL. were consolidated with IN RE CITIGROUP INC. BOND LITIGATION.

        On May 11,October 14, 2009, a putative class action ASHER,INTERNATIONAL FUND MANAGEMENT S.A., ET AL. v. CITIGROUP INC., ET AL. was filed by several foreign investment funds and fund management companies and the City of Richmond in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging violations ofasserting, among other claims, claims under the Securities Exchange Act of 19331934 against various defendants, including Citigroup and several current and former Citigroup executives. The claims asserted in connection with plaintiffs' investments in certain offerings of preferred stock issued by the Company. On May 15, 2009, plaintiffsthis action are similar to those asserted in IN RE CITIGROUP INC. BOND LITIGATION requested that ASHER and PELLEGRINI v. CITIGROUP INC., ET AL. be consolidated with IN RE CITIGROUP INC. BOND LITIGATION.

        On May 20, 2009, EPIRUS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. v. CITIGROUP INC., ET AL. was designated as related to IN RE CITIGROUP INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION. On June 10 and June 24, 2009, defendants filed motions to dismiss the verified complaint.

        Derivative Actions.    On July 16,August 25, 2009, a derivative lawsuit LERNER v. CITIGROUP INC., ET AL. was filed in New York state court against various current and former officers and directors of Citigroup alleging derivative claims of mismanagement and breach of fiduciary duty in connection with subprime mortgage—related exposures.

Other Matters.

        Underwriting Actions. In its capacity as a member of various underwriting syndicates, CGMI also has been named as a defendant in several subprime-related actions asserted against various issuers of debt and other securities. Most of these actions involve claims asserted on behalf of putative classes of purchasers of securities for alleged violations of Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

        American Home Mortgage.    On July 7, 2009, lead plaintiffs filed a motion in IN RE AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SECURITIES LITIGATION for preliminary approval of settlements reached with all defendants (including Citigroup and CGMI).

        AIG.    On March 20, 2009, four putative class actions were consolidated by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York underdismissed without prejudice the captioncomplaint in IN RE AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP,CITIGROUP INC. 2008 SECURITIES LITIGATION. PlaintiffsSHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION for failure to make a pre-suit demand on the Board of Directors and failure to plead demand futility. On September 18, 2009, plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint on May 19, 2009, which includes two Citigroup affiliates amongmotion for leave to amend the underwriter defendants.complaint.

        Public NuisanceCitigroup has received letters on behalf of purported shareholders demanding that the Board of Directors take remedial action, including the filing of legal claims, with respect to certain of the matters alleged in the subprime mortgage—related securities and Relatedderivative litigations, among other matters. The Board has formed a committee to consider the demands asserted in the letters.

        ERISA Actions.    On May 15,August 31, 2009, CITY OF CLEVELAND v. AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., ET AL. wasthe United States District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed with prejudice. The Citythe complaint in IN RE CITIGROUP ERISA LITIGATION for failure to state a claim that defendants breached their fiduciary duties by offering Citigroup stock as an investment option in the ERISA plans and entered judgment in favor of Cleveland hasdefendants. On September 8, 2009, plaintiffs appealed the dismissal to the United States Court of Appeals for the SixthSecond Circuit.

        Other Matters.    Underwriting Actions.American Home Mortgage. On July 27, 2009, UTAH RETIREMENT SYSTEMS v. STRAUSS, ET AL. was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York asserting, among other claims, claims under the Securities Act of 1933 and Utah state law arising out of an offering of American Home Mortgage common stock underwritten by CGMI.

        On July 31, 2009, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York entered an order preliminarily approving settlements reached with all defendants (including Citigroup and CGMI) in IN RE AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SECURITIES LITIGATION.

        AIG.    On August 5, 2009, the underwriter defendants, including CGMI and CGML, moved to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint in IN RE AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. 2008 SECURITIES LITIGATION.

        Discrimination in Lending Actions. On September 21, 2009, the United States District Court for the Central District of California denied defendant CitiMortgage's motion for summary judgment and granted its motion to strike the jury demand in NAACP v. AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE CO., ET AL.

        Public Nuisance and Related Actions. On August 7, 2009, the City of Cleveland dismissed, without prejudice, its claims against CitiFinancial and CitiMortgage in CITY OF CLEVELAND v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., ET AL.


Table of Contents

Counterparty Actions. CounterpartiesOn October 7, 2009, defendants filed a motion to transactions involving CDOs, SIVs, credit default swaps ("CDS"), and other instruments related to investmentsdismiss the complaint in mortgage-backed securities have sued Citigroup on a variety of theories. On August 3, 2009, one such counterparty filed an action—AMBAC CREDIT PRODUCTS, LLC v. CITIGROUP INC., et al.—in New York Supreme Court, County of New York, alleging various claims including fraud and breach of fiduciary duty in connection with Citigroup's purchase of CDS from Ambac as credit protection for a $1.95 billion super-senior tranche of a CDO structured by Citigroup, the underlying assets of which allegedly included subprime mortgage-backed securities. Ambac alleges, among other things, that Citigroup misrepresented the nature of the risks that were being transferred.ET AL.

        Governmental and Regulatory Matters.    Citigroup and certain of its affiliates and current and former employees are subject to formal and informal investigations, as well as subpoenas and/or requests for information, from various governmental and self-regulatory agencies relating to subprime mortgage—related activities. Citigroup and its affiliates are cooperating fully and are engaged in discussions onefforts to resolve certain of these matters.

Auction Rate Securities—Related Litigation and Other Matters

        Securities Actions.    On June 10,July 23, 2009, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation granted CGMI's motion to transfer AMERICAN EAGLE OUTFITTERS, INC., ET AL.issued an order transferring K-V PHARMACEUTICAL CO. v. CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC.CGMI from the United


Table of Contents

States District Court for the WesternEastern District of PennsylvaniaMissouri to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York where it will be coordinatedfor coordination with IN RE CITIGROUP INC. AUCTION RATE SECURITIES LITIGATIONLITIGATION. On August 24, 2009, CGMI moved to dismiss the complaint.

        On September 11, 2009, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed without prejudice the complaint in IN RE CITIGROUP AUCTION RATE SECURITIES LITIGATION. On October 15, 2009, lead plaintiff filed a second consolidated amended complaint asserting claims under Sections 10 and FINN v. SMITH BARNEY, ET AL.20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

        On June 17,October 2, 2009, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation issued an order conditionally transferring three other individual auction rate securities actions pending againsttransferred OCWEN FINANCIAL CORP., ET AL. v. CGMI in other federal courts to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Plaintiffs in those actions have opposed their transfer.York for coordination with IN RE CITIGROUP AUCTION RATE SECURITIES LITIGATION.

        Derivative Actions.    On April 1,September 10, 2009, TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC. v. CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC., ET AL. was filed in Texas state court asserting violations of state securities law by CGMI, BNY Capital Markets, Inc. and Morgan Stanley and Co., Inc. Defendants removed the case to the United States District Court for the NorthernSouthern District of Texas,New York dismissed without prejudice the complaint in LOUISIANA MUNICIPAL POLICE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. PANDIT, ET AL. for failure to make a pre-suit demand on the Board of Directors and failure to plead demand futility. On September 16, 2009, Citigroup received a letter on behalf of plaintiff demanding that the Board of Directors take remedial action, including the filing of legal claims, with respect to the matters alleged in the dismissed complaint. The Board has movedformed a committee to have it remanded to state court.consider the demands asserted in the letter. On May 8,September 23, 2009, CGMIplaintiff filed a motion to severfor reconsideration of the claims against it from the claims against its co-defendants.district court's order of dismissal.

        Governmental and Regulatory Actions.    Citigroup and certain of its affiliates and current and former employees are subject to formal and informal investigations, as well as subpoenas and/or requests for information, from various governmental and self-regulatory agencies relating to auction rate securities. Citigroup and its affiliates are cooperating fully and are engaged in discussions on these matters.

Falcon and ASTA/MAT-Related Litigation and Other Matters

        Marie Raymond Revocable Trust, et al. v. MAT Five LLC, et al.    On June 19, 2009, the Delaware Supreme Court denied the appeal of the settlement objectors from the Delaware Chancery Court's approval of the settlement of this matter and affirmed the order approving the settlement.

        In re MAT Five Securities Litigation.    On July 8, 2009, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York approved the voluntary dismissal of this action.

        Puglisi v. Citigroup Alternative Investments LLC, et al.    On May 29, 2009, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York denied plaintiff's motion to remand this action to state court. On July 8, 2009, the District Court dismissed this action without prejudice in connection with the dismissal of IN RE MAT FIVE SECURITIES LITIGATION.

ECA Acquisitions, Inc., et al. v. MAT Three LLC, et al.    On May 1,September 14, 2009, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York denied plaintiffs'defendants filed a motion to remand this action to state court. On July 15, 2009, plaintiffs filed andismiss the amended complaint.

        Zentner v. Citigroup, et al.    (putative class action concerning MAT 2, 3 and 5, which was consolidated with IN RE MAT FIVE SECURITIES LITIGATION). On July 8, 2009, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed this action, without prejudice, in connection with the dismissal of IN RE MAT FIVE SECURITIES LITIGATION.

        Zentner v. Citigroup, et al.    (putative class action concerning Falcon Plus). On May 19, 2009, the New York Supreme Court issued a letter order, stating that it would approve a settlement of plaintiff's individual claims. Plaintiff filed a stipulation dismissing this action on July 6, 2009.

        Governmental and Regulatory Matters.    Citigroup and certain of its affiliates are subject to formal and informal investigations, as well as subpoenas and/or requests for information, from various governmental and self-regulatory agencies relating to the marketing and management of the Falcon and ASTA/MAT funds. Citigroup and its affiliates are cooperating fully and are engaged in discussions on these matters.

Adelphia Communications Corporation

        Trial of the Adelphia Recovery Trust's claims against Citigroup and numerous other defendants is scheduled to begin in April 2010.

IPO Securities Litigation

        In October 2009, the District Court entered an order granting final approval of the settlement.

Other Matters

        Destiny Litigations.On June 9 and 12, 2009, two actions—DESTINY USA HOLDINGS, LLC v. CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS REALTY CORP. and CONGEL, ET. AL. v. CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS REALTY CORP.—were filed in New York State Supreme Court, Onondaga County, against Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. (CGMRC), respectively relating to CGMRC's issuance of Deficiency and Default Notices (the "Notices") pursuant to a construction loan agreement with Destiny USA Holdings, LLC (Destiny). Destiny seeks declaratory and injunctive relief and damages for CGMRC's alleged breach of the loan agreement. On July 17, 2009, the court granted Destiny's motion for a preliminary injunction, vacated the Notices, and directed CGMRC to pay all sums due under Destiny's existing funding requests and to pay all future sums due as requested under the loan agreement. That order has been stayed pending the outcome of CGMRC's state court appeal.

        Investor Actions.    Investors in municipal bonds and other instruments affected by the collapse of the credit markets have sued Citigroup on a variety of theories. On August 10, 2009, certain such investors, a Norwegian securities firm and seven Norwegian municipalities, filed an action—TERRA SECURITIES ASA KONKURSBO, ET AL. v. CITIGROUP INC., ET AL.—in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York entered an order preliminarily approving the proposed settlement of this matteragainst Citigroup, CGMI and scheduling a hearing to determine whether the proposed settlement should be finally approved.

Wachovia/Wells Fargo Litigation

        On July 13, 2009, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled that Section 126(c)Citigroup Alternative Investments LLC, asserting claims under Sections 10 and 20 of the Emergency Economic StabilizationSecurities Exchange Act of 2008 bars the enforcement1934 and state law arising out of the Citigroup-Wachovia Exclusivity Agreementmunicipalities' investment in connectioncertain notes. On October 7, 2009, defendants filed a motion to dismiss.

        Japan Regulatory Matters.    Beginning in late 2008, certain Citigroup affiliates received requests for information from Japanese regulators relating to the accuracy of their large shareholding reporting in Japan. These Citigroup affiliates are cooperating fully with such requests and, among other things, in the Wachovia-Wells Fargo transaction. Citi plans to pursue further proceedingsthird quarter of 2009 filed approximately 900 public reports in this litigation, including an appealJapan correcting and supplementing previous large


Table of the court's ruling.Contents

Other Mattersshareholding reports. Administrative fines and other penalties may be imposed against these Citigroup affiliates.

        Lehman Brothers—Structured Notes.    Retail customers outside of the United States continue to file, and threaten to file, claims for the loss in value of their investments. There are currently 99 civil actions pending in six European countries related to the distribution of Lehman structured notes. The first court hearing in the Belgian criminal case (in which more than 1300 customers are expected to file as civil complainants seeking compensation) is expected to take place on December 1, 2009. A public prosecutorcriminal investigation has begun in Poland, and the criminal investigations in Greece has opened an investigation, whilecontinue. Scrutiny by regulatory authorities outside of the United States is ongoing, and there have been a public prosecutornumber of adverse regulatory findings.

        Pension Plan Litigation.    On October 19, 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed the district court's order granting summary judgment in Belgium has served a writfavor of summons on a Citigroup subsidiaryplaintiffs and three currentdismissed plaintiffs' complaint. The Second Circuit held that Citigroup's pension plan did not violate ERISA's minimum benefit accrual rules and former employees.that there had been no violation of ERISA's notice requirements.

        W.R. Huff Asset Management Co., LLC v. Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co., L.P.    InOn August 1999, W. R. Huff Asset Management6, 2009, the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Alabama, granted defendant Robinson Humphrey Co., LLC filed this lawsuit (the "KKR Case") LLC's motion to strike the Fourth Amended Complaint on behalfstatute of its clients who purchased 101/2% Senior Subordinated Notes issued in 1995 in connection with the leveraged recapitalization of Bruno's, Inc. The case was filed in Alabama state court againstlimitations grounds, thereby dismissing Robinson Humphrey Co. LLC which served as financial advisor to Bruno's in connectionfrom the case. On August 25, 2009, the case was consolidated for discovery purposes, but not for trial, with the leveraged recapitalization (and which later became a fully owned subsidiary ofrelated case against Salomon Smith Barney) and others. The KKR Case arises out of the same transaction at issue inBrothers, Inc., 27001 PARTNERSHIP, ET AL. v. BT SECURITIES CORP., ET AL. (the "BT Securities Case"). The allegations and potential exposureTrial in the KKR Case27001 PARTNERSHIP action remains scheduled to commence in February 2010. On September 18, 2009, defendants Salomon Brothers, Inc. and BTChemical Securities, Case are similar, withInc. moved for summary judgment, and plaintiffs seeking compensatory damages, punitive damages, attorneys' fees, costs and pre-judgment interest in an amount they allege to be between approximately $250 million and $750 million. After years of motion practice over jurisdictional issues, on April 29, 2009, the Court of Appealsmoved for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the District Court's order allowing Huff to amend its complaint to substitute the same 46 individual noteholders named as plaintiffs in the BT Securities Case as plaintiffs in the KKR Case, resulting in remand of the case to Alabama state court. Defendants' motion to strike the Fourth Amended Complaint and plaintiffs' motion to consolidate the BT Securities and KKR Cases are pending.


Table of Contentspartial summary judgment.

Settlement Payments

        Any payments required by Citigroup or its affiliates in connection with the settlement agreements described above either have been made, or are covered by existing litigation reserves.


Table of Contents

Item 1A.    Risk Factors

        There are no material changes from the risk factors set forth under Part I, Item 1A. "Risk Factors" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.


Table of Contents

Item 2.    Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(c)

Share Repurchases

        Under its long-standing repurchase program, the Company may buy back common shares in the market or otherwise from time to time. This program may be used for many purposes, including to offset dilution from stock-based compensation programs.

        The following table summarizes the Company's share repurchases during the first sixnine months of 2009:

In millions, except per share amounts Total shares
purchased(1)
 Average
price paid
per share
 Approximate
dollar value of
shares that may
yet be purchased
under the plans or
programs
 

First quarter 2009

          
 

Open market repurchases(1)

  0.2 $3.03 $6,741 
 

Employee transactions(2)

  10.7  3.56  N/A 
        

Total first quarter 2009

  10.9 $3.55 $6,741 

April 2009

          
 

Open market repurchases(1)

  0.1 $3.36 $6,740 
 

Employee transactions(2)

  0.2  3.09  N/A 

May 2009

          
 

Open market repurchases(1)

   $ $6,740 
 

Employee transactions(2)

  0.1  3.61  N/A 

June 2009

          
 

Open market repurchases(1)

  0.1 $2.98 $6,740 
 

Employee transactions(2)

  4.1  3.69  N/A 
        

Second quarter 2009

          
 

Open market repurchases(1)

  0.2 $3.27 $6,740 
 

Employee transactions(2)

  4.4  3.67  N/A 
        

Total second quarter 2009

  4.6 $3.65 $6,740 
        

Year-to-date 2009

          
 

Open market repurchases(1)

  0.4 $3.16 $6,740 
 

Employee transactions(2)

  15.1  3.59  N/A 
        

Total year-to-date 2009

  15.5 $3.58 $6,740 
        

In millions, except per share amounts Total shares purchased(1) Average price paid per share Approximate
dollar value of
shares that may
yet be purchased
under the plans or
programs
 

First quarter 2009

          
 

Open market repurchases(1)

  0.2 $3.03 $6,741 
 

Employee transactions(2)

  10.7  3.56  N/A 
        

Total first quarter 2009

  10.9 $3.55 $6,741 
        

Second quarter 2009

          
 

Open market repurchases(1)

  0.2 $3.27 $6,740 
 

Employee transactions(2)

  4.4  3.67  N/A 
        

Total second quarter 2009

  4.6 $3.65 $6,740 
        

July 2009

          
 

Open market repurchases(1)

  0.4 $3.09 $6,739 
 

Employee transactions(2)

  1.1  3.08  N/A 

August 2009

          
 

Open market repurchases(1)

   $ $6,739 
 

Employee transactions(2)

  0.1  3.66  N/A 

September 2009

          
 

Open market repurchases(1)

  0.1 $4.67 $6,739 
 

Employee transactions(2)

  0.1  4.52  N/A 
        

Third quarter 2009

          
 

Open market repurchases(1)

  0.5 $3.21 $6,739 
 

Employee transactions(2)

  1.3  3.22  N/A 
        

Total third quarter 2009

  1.8 $3.22 $6,739 
        

Year-to-date 2009

          
 

Open market repurchases(1)

  0.9 $3.18 $6,739 
 

Employee transactions(2)

  16.4  3.56  N/A 
        

Total year-to-date 2009

  17.3 $3.54 $6,739 
        

(1)
All open market repurchases were transacted under an existing authorized share repurchase plan. On April 17, 2006, the Board of Directors authorized up to an additional $10 billion in share repurchases. Shares repurchased in the first, second and secondthird quarters of 2009 relate to customer fails/errors.

(2)
Consists of shares added to treasury stock related to activity on employee stock option program exercises, where the employee delivers existing shares to cover the option exercise, or under the Company's employee restricted or deferred stock program, where shares are withheld to satisfy tax requirements.

N/A    Not applicable.

        In accordance with the recent exchange agreements with the U.S. government,USG, the Company agreed not to pay a quarterly common stock dividend exceeding $0.01 per share per quarter for so long as the USG holds any debt or equity security of Citigroup (or any affiliate thereof) acquired by the USG in connection with the public and private exchange offers, without the consent of the U.S. government.USG. Any dividend on Citi's outstanding common stock would need to be made in compliance with Citi's obligations to any remaining outstanding preferred stock. In addition, pursuant to various of its agreements with the U.S. government,USG, the Company agreed not to repurchase its common stock subject to certain limited exceptions, including in the ordinary course of business as part of employee benefit programs, without the consent of the U.S. government.USG.


Table of Contents


Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

        ForOn the resultsJuly 24, 2009 voting deadline for Citigroup's Preferred Proxy Statement dated June 18, 2009, the votes cast on the proposals to amend the Company's restated certificate of Citigroup's Annual Meetingincorporation and the certificates of Stockholders held on April 21, 2009, please referdesignation of certain series of the Company's preferred stock did not meet the required quorum of a majority of the outstanding shares of the Company's common stock. As a result, the proposals were not approved.

        Set forth below, with respect to the information under Part II, Item 4 "Submissionproposals covered by Citigroup's Preferred Proxy Statement dated June 18, 2009, are the number of Mattersvotes consenting to a Voteapprove the proposal, the number of Security Holders"votes withholding consent, and the number of abstentions.

 
  
 CONSENT WITHHOLD
CONSENT
 ABSTAIN 

(1)

 Proposal to eliminate certain requirements with respect to the declaration and payment of dividends on the Company's preferred stock.   1,616,485,022  133,242,379  188,213,673 

(2)

 Proposal to eliminate the right of holders of the Company's preferred stock to elect two directors if dividends on that preferred stock have not been paid.   1,608,466,652  137,116,210  192,358,085 

(3)

 Proposal to clarify that shares of certain series of the Company's preferred stock acquired by the Company will be restored to the status of authorized but unissued shares without designation as to series.   1,134,202,301  607,909,223  195,824,857 

(4)

 Proposal to increase the number of authorized shares of preferred stock from 30 million to 2 billion.   1,105,887,808  629,622,756  192,425,539 

        On September 3, 2009, the Company announced that its common stockholders had approved the three proposed amendments to the Company's restated certificate of incorporation submitted to common stockholders in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forCitigroup's Common Proxy Statement dated June 18, 2009.

        Set forth below, with respect to the quarter ending March 31, 2009.proposals covered by Citigroup's Common Proxy Statement dated June 18, 2009, are the number of votes consenting to approve the proposal, the number of votes withholding consent, and the number of abstentions.

 
  
 CONSENT WITHHOLD
CONSENT
 ABSTAIN 

(1)

 Proposal to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 15 billion to 60 billion shares.   7,056,506,251  188,694,489  26,840,344 

(2)

 Proposal to effect a reverse stock split of the Company's common stock at any time prior to June 30, 2010 at one of seven reverse split ratios, at the sole discretion of the Company's Board of Directors.   8,558,930,213  537,925,274  78,420,206 

(3)

 Proposal to eliminate the voting rights of shares of common stock with respect to any amendment to the Company's restated certificate of incorporation that relates solely to the terms of one or more outstanding series of the Company's preferred stock.   6,629,778,336  604,659,624  37,525,290 

Table of Contents


Item 6. Exhibits

        See Exhibit Index.


Table of Contents


SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 7th6th day of August,November, 2009.


 

 

CITIGROUP INC.
    (Registrant)

 

 

By

 

/s/ JOHN C. GERSPACH

John C. Gerspach
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)

 

 

By

 

/s/ JEFFREY R. WALSH

Jeffrey R. Walsh
Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)

Table of Contents


EXHIBIT INDEX

 2.01 Amended and Restated Joint Venture Contribution and Formation Agreement, dated May 29, 2009, by and among Citigroup Inc. (the Company), Morgan Stanley and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Holdings LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 3, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).

 

2.02

+

Share Purchase Agreement, dated May 1, 2009, by and among Nikko Citi Holdings Inc., Nikko Cordial Securities Inc., Nikko Citi Business Services Inc., Nikko Citigroup Limited, and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation.


3.01.1


Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company,Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.01 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed December 15, 1998 (No. 333-68949).


3.01.2


Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company dated April 18, 2000, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01.32.02 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2000 (File No. 1-9924).


3.01.3


Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company dated April 17, 2001, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01.4 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2001 (File No. 1-9924).


3.01.4


Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company dated April 18, 2006, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01.6 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006 (File No. 1-9924).


3.01.5


Certificate of Designation of 6.5% Non-Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, Series T, of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.09 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 25, 2008 (File No. 1-9924).


3.01.6


Certificate of Designation of 8.125% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series AA, of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.10 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 25, 2008 (File No. 1-9924).


3.01.7


Certificate of Designation of 8.40% Fixed Rate/Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series E, of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 28, 2008 (File No. 1-9924).


3.01.8


Certificate of Designation of 8.50% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series F, of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 13, 2008 (File No. 1-9924).


3.01.9


Certificate of Designations of Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series H, of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed OctoberJune 30, 2008 (File No. 1-9924).


3.01.10


Certificate of Designations of Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series I, of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 31, 2008 (File No. 1-9924).


3.01.11


Certificate of Designations of Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series G, of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 16, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).

 

3.01.123.01

+

Restated Certificate of Designation of Series R Participating Cumulative Preferred StockIncorporation of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 12, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).


3.01.13


Certificate of Designations of Series M Common Stock Equivalent of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 23, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).dated October 30, 2009.

 

3.02

 

By-Laws of the Company, as amended, effective October 16, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 19, 2007 (File No. 1-9924).

 

4.01

 

Warrant, dated October 28, 2008, issued by the Company to the United States Department of the Treasury (the UST), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 30, 2008 (File No. 1-9924).

 

4.02

 

Warrant, dated December 31, 2008, issued by the Company to the UST, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 31, 2008 (File No. 1-9924).

 

4.03

 

Warrant, dated January 15, 2009, issued by the Company to the UST, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 16, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).

 

4.04

 

Tax Benefits Preservation Plan, dated June 9, 2009, between the Company and Computershare Trust Company, N.A.,

Table of Contents

incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 10, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).

 

10.01


Citigroup 2009 Stock Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 22, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).


10.02

+

LetterForm of Understanding, dated April 22, 2008, between the Company and Ajaypal Banga.Citigroup Equity or Deferred Cash Award Agreement (effective November 1, 2009).

 

12.01

+

Calculation of Ratio of Income to Fixed Charges.

 

12.02

+

Calculation of Ratio of Income to Fixed Charges (including preferred stock dividends).

 

31.01

+

Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

31.02

+

Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

32.01

+

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

99.01

+

Residual Value Obligation Certificate.

 

101.01

+

Financial statements from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Citigroup Inc. for the quarter ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009, filed on August 7,November 6, 2009, formatted in XBRL: (i) the Consolidated Statement of Income, (ii) the Consolidated Balance Sheet, (iii) the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity, (iv) the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements tagged as blocks of text.

The total amount of securities authorized pursuant to any instrument defining rights of holders of long-term debt of the Company does not exceed 10% of the total assets of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries. The Company will furnish copies of any such instrument to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

+
Filed herewith